The URL can be used to link to this page

2004-08-10 ~ ~,, ~, . II Ii! PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS ~,~,~i~i~~,~ .................. ~,~i'~:,,,:::,~:,:~:~:,:,:~:,~-:'~:,:~:,:,:,"'::~::.'.:.:::~,::~~::~:~:,:::~ ............... ~ ......................................... ~ .......... ~ .......... ?., ............... ,...'..:'~,...-' ,: ".,'":,',-: ...... *Consent Agenda.. Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Open meeting - Pledge of Allegiance 2. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent__~A enda *A. Approve minutes: July 20, 2004 special meeting July 27, 2004 regular meeting *B. Approve payment of claims *C. Approve resolution appointing election judges for primary and general elections 2368-2369 2370-2373 2374-2401 2402 *D. Approve resolution appointing absentee ballot board for primary and general elections 2403 *E. Set special meeting workshop for 2005 budget discussion: Sept 7, 6:30 p.m *F. Approve resolution authorizing City Manager to sign grant agreement with Metropolitan Council for Metropolitan Environmental Partnership (MEP) Grant for stormwater design and treatment for Mound Harbor Renaissance Development Project 2404-2417 *G. Approve Payment Request #3 to Valley Paving for 2004 Street Reconstruction Project 2418-2421 *H. Approve Payment Request #8 to EAI for Lost Lake Greenway Project 2422-2428 *I. Approve Resolution Ordering an AUAR for the Mound Visions Redevelopment Plan 2429-2432 *J. Approve Resolution Approving Terms of $121,510 Internal Loan 2433-2434 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) Direction and Action authorizing staff to prepare change order related to the Lost Lake Greenway Project Correspondence: Newsletters: Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Reports: Skate park project Harbor Wine & Spirits B. LMCD C. Hennepin County Gillespie Center 7. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web si{e: www. cityofmound, com. 2435-2436 2437 2438 2439-2457 2458-2463 2464 More current m~eting COUNCIL BRIEFING August 10, 2004 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!~ Aug 10 - 7:20 - HRA regular meeting Aug 10 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Aug 14 - Dog Days of Navarre Aug 24-Sept 7 - Filing for City Council Sept 7 - 6:30 -Budget workshop Sept 10-12 - Incredible Festival - Our Lady of the Lake Sept 14 - Primary Election Sept 15 - 6:30 -rescheduled HRA meeting Sept 15 - 7:30 - rescheduled CC meeting Sept 17 - 6:30 - Taste of the Lakes Sept 28 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Sept 28 - 7:40 - CC regular meeting Oct 31 - Daylight Savings Time ends Nov 2 - General Election Nov 4 - 6:00 - Exclusive Wine Tasting Event - Burl Oaks Nov 9 - 2:00-4:00 - Flu Shots - City Hall Nov 18 - 7:00 - Tree Lighting Ceremony Upcoming Absences F-~ ~ug 26-29 Kandis Hanson Oct 9-11 Kandis Hanson Oct 15-20 Kandis Hanson Vacation LMC Conference ICMA Conference Admin Offices Closed Sept 6 Labor Day Nov 11 Veteran's Day Art in the Park Much to my disappointment, the first Mound Art in the Park has been cancelled, due to lack of vendor interest. It is my theory that even though the optimism of those who live in Mound has been raised, it will take longer to change its image in the minds of those from the outside. Hopefully it will be considered again in the future. Flue Shots Mound City Council members may take advantage of the flu shots for a minor fee - $15.00. More Press! I was recently interviewed regarding the unfolding Mound Visions redevelopment plan for the third time in three years by the Minnesota Real Estate Journal. I will provide you copies when they are available. Employee Appreciation Events Thank you for any involvement you may have had in the summer employee appreciation events. I realize you (~" are all very busy and but want you to know that your occasional attendance at these is noticed and appreciated. Have a gr~t w~-~l! COUNCIL BRIEFING August 10, 2004 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Aug 10 - 7:20 - HRA regular meeting Aug 10 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Aug 14 - Dog Days of Navarre Aug 24-Sept 7 - Filing for City Council Sept 7 - 6:30 - Budget workshop Sept 10-12 - Incredible Festival - Our Lady of the Lake Sept 14 - Primary Election Sept 15 - 6:30 -rescheduled HRA meeting Sept 15 - 7:30 -rescheduled CC meeting Sept 17 - 6:30 - Taste of the Lakes Sept 28 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Sept 28 - 7:40 - CC regular meeting Oct 31 - Daylight Savings Time ends Nov 2 - General Election Nov 4 - 6:00 - Exclusive Wine Tasting Event - Burl Oaks Nov 9 - 2:00-4:00 - Flu Shots - City Hall Nov 18 - 7:00 - Tree Lighting Ceremony ~,, Upcoming Absences Aug 26-29 Kandis Hanson Oct 9-11 Kandis Hanson Oct 15-20 Kandis Hanson Vacation LMC Conference ICMA Conference Admin Offices Closed Sept 6 Labor Day Nov 11 Veteran's Day Art in the Park Much to my disappointment, the first Mound Art in the Park has been cancelled, due to lack of vendor interest. It is my theory that even though the optimism of those who live in Mound has been raised, it will take longer to change its image in the minds of those from the outside. Hopefully it will be considered again in the future. Flue Shots Mound City Council members may take advantage of the flu shots for a minor fee - $15.00. More Press! I was recently interviewed regarding the unfolding Mound Visions redevelopment plan for the third time in three years by the Minnesota Real Estate Journal. I will provide you copies when they are available. Employee Appreciation Event.q ,(~,., Thank you for any involvement you may have had in the summer employee appreciation events. I realize are all very busy and but want you to know that your occasional attendance at these is noticed and appreciaYte°~. ~ c~ve~ cv ~rex~ MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 20, 2OO4 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Tuesday, July 20, 2004, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Parks Director Jim Fackler, Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Police Chief Jim Kurtz, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Jim Prosser, Dave Callister, Brian Swartzer. 1. Open Meeting Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 2. Ehlers and Associates on Key Financial Strateqie~ Jim Prosser of Ehlers and Associates conducted Session 1 of a proposed Key Financial Strategies Program for the City. He reviewed the purpose and expectations of this program, the process, financial foundations and similar community comparisons. No action was taken on this item, and Prosser will present Session 2 at a later date. Councilmember Brown arrived at 7:35 p.m. 3. Post Employment Health Care Savinqs Plan Carlton Moore presented a review of the proposed plan. Hanus stated that he feels that discussion on this plan is fine, but adoption should be considered at contract time as part of the total package because it is adding to the overall cost of labor. Osmek stated that if this is not part of the contract, it is not part of the negotiations, and feels that it should be. Meisel stated that if its part of the contracts, it's hard to change, and also non-union employees are included in this proposed plan. The Committee met several times on the plan and they think it's similar to private sector programs. Meyer commented that he thinks staff is the most important City asset and this plan is good for them. Osmek doesn't consider not approving this plan, not supporting employees. He defends and thanks employees, but thinks this plan is too much too quickly. He could maybe approve a scaled down version if included in union contracts, because the plan is included in the total cost of labor. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Meyer to adopt the Post Employment Heath Care Savings Plan as presented, to be effective January 1,2005. The following voted in 1 -2368- favor: Brown, Meisel and Meyer. The following voted against: Hanus and Osmek. Motion carried. 4. Adiourn MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 8:40 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -2369- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTt=~ JULY 27, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 27, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Police Chief Jim Kurtz, Jerry Mader, John Beise, Cklair Hasse, Terry Hughes, Ann Hunt, Steve Hewitt, Mike Gardner, Craig Fink, Steve Johnson, Mike Specht. Consent Agenda: Afl items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roil carl vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meetinq Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 2. Approve Aqenda MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. Consent Aqenda Meyer requested the removal of Item 3G for discussion. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of July 13, 2004 regular meeting B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $363,640.66. C. RESOLUTION NO. 04-84: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE AT 1599 BLUEBIRD LANE FOR A 2-STORY ADDITION AND COMPREHENSIVE REMODEL. P&Z CASE #04-17. PID #13-117-24-12-0128. D. Approve temporary sign permit for Our Lady of the Lake Incredible Festival to be held September 10-12, 2004. E. Approve temporary on-sale 3.2 malt beverage license for Our Lady of the Lake Incredible Festival to be held September 10-12, 2004. -2370- Mound City Council Minutes - July 27, 2004 F. RESOLUTION NO. 04-85: RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES SECTION 272.161, SUBD. 3 TO REQUIRE LOCAL APPROVAL OF LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY TRANSFERS PRIOR TO CONVEYANCE BY HENNEPIN COUNTY. G. (removed) H. Authorize McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc., to prepare a feasibility report for Chateau Lane elevated water storage facility. I. RESOLUTION NO. 04-86: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR STEVEN L. HEWITT, 4849 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE. J. Award contract for 2004 Seal Coat Program to Pearson Brothers in the amount of $38,900, as recommended by City Engineer. 3G. Resolution requesting that Hennepin County post Commerce Boulevard as "no I~arkin.q" from end of current construction, north to Minnetrista border. Police Chief Kurtz explained City Staff had been working with Hennepin County to address traffic problems on County Road 110 near the Three Points Neighborhood. Hennepin County has prepared a plan that addresses all concerns. The plan divides the road so that there are two lanes of traffic (one going north and one going south) turn lanes, and six-foot shoulders. In addition there will be a crosswalk placed at Grandview and CR110. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-87: RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT HENNEPIN COUNTY POST COMMERCE BOULEVARD (CSAH 110) AS NO PARKING FROM THE END OF THE CURRENT CONSTRUCTION (APPROXIMATELY CHURCH STREET), NORTH TO THE MINNETRISTA BORDER. 4. Comments and sucLclestions from citizens present on any item not on the a_clenda... None were offered. 5. Case #04-15 - Sketch Plan for Halstead Pointe - 6701 County Rd. 11016639 Bartlett Boulevard - 56 unit condo com~)lex Sarah Smith reviewed the sketch plan for Hals-tead Pointe, a (56) unit condominium project proposed for the manufactured home court located at 6701 County Road 110 and 6639 Bartlett Boulevard, which straddles the western boundary of Mound and eastern boundary of Minnetrista. The project consists of seven 8-unit buildings which includes one (8-unit) building in Mound and six buildings (48-units) in Minnetrista. It was noted that the development team is going through Minnetrista's process for this project simultaneously with Mound's. -2371- Mound City Council Minutes - July 27, 2004 The development team introduced themselves, and were available to answer questions. Discussion followed regarding parking, public safety, dockage, drainage and utilities. Terry Hughes, 6641 Halstead Lane, stated that he's been at his residence since 1986 and he has not talked to anyone in the neighborhood that's in favor of the project. He stated that the feeling that the neighbors want to get rid of the trailer court is wrong. He objects to the high density and asked why single family homes weren't considered. Craig Fink from the development team stated that the project wasn't economically feasible with single family homes and that they are trying to work with the neighborhood. He has received positive feedback from some of the neighbors. Jerry Mader, 6607 Bartlett Blvd., expressed his opposition to the high density housing and also concern over parking. Fink stated that the units will have underground parking. Cklair Hasse, 6627 Bartlett Blvd., asked if there was going to be any R2 left in Mound or would it all be changed to R5 or R6. Meisel stated that the proposal will probably fit into Mound's plan, but everything is still in the very preliminary plans and this project has to go through all the Commissions yet. No action was needed on this item. The Development Team will proceed with the process with both Minnetrista and Mound. 6. Proposed Amendment to City Code Chapter 330 (Subdivision Ordinance) to regulate dock lot parcels for the purpose of providing lake access for nearby properties. · Hanus suggested minor changes to the presented draft, which incorporated some of the Planning Commission suggestions from their July 19th meeting. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to pass the following ordinance as amended. Meyer asked if this ordinance is really needed. He feels it can be done by private agreement between parties and that non-conforming lots should not be created. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 07-2004: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 330 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE) TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF DOCK PARCELS FOR PURPOSE OF PROVIDING LAKE ACCESS FOR NEARBY PROPERTIES 3 -2372- Mound City Council Minutes - July 27, 2004 7. Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Report: Finance Department- May 2004 B. Letter: DNR, dated July 15, 2004 C. Summer 2004 Redevelopment Update D. Update: Skate park Project E. Calendar: LMCC F. Correspondence: LMCD G. Correspondence: City of St Paul & City of Minneapolis H. Letter: LMC I. Newsletter: Lake Minnetonka Association J. Report: Costs associated w/Gillespie Center cooperative agreement K. Letter: CenterPoint Energy Minnegasco L. Letter: Met Council on population information M. Met Council directions 8. Adjourn, MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 8:38 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk 4 -2373- AUGUST 10, 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETIN~ 0704CRCARD $4,823.85 JULY 072804SU E $9,581.24 JULY 080404SUE $62,868.33AUGUST 080504SUE $3,540.60 AUGUST 081004SUE $351,944.55 AUGUST TOTAL $432,758.57 -2374- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 073104CRCARD Payments City of Mound Payments 07/26/04 11:00 AM Page 1 Refer 73104 ELAN CREDIT CARD Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment invoice 073104 Cash Payment invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Cash Payment Invoice 073104 Current Period: July 2004 User Dollar Amt $4,823.85 Computer Dollar Amt $4,823.85 E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 101-41910-300 Professional Srvs 7/31/2004 E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training 7/31/2004 E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 222.42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/31/2004 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 7/31/2004 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 7/31/2004 E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 7/31/2004 E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense 7/31/2004 E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense 7/31/2004 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 7/31/2004 E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense $0.00 In Balance 06-30-04 DRAFTING EQUIPMENT WAR $I ,205,82 06-30-04 DRAFTING EQUIPMENT WAR $310.59 06-30-04 DRAFTING EQUIPMENT WAR $310,59 07-03-04 OFFICE DEPOT TAG BOARD $11.11 07-03-04 OFFICE DEPOT TAG BOARD $11.11 07-03-04 OFFICE DEPOT TAG BOARD $11.12 06-19-04 INET 7 INTERNET SERVICE $30.95 06-25-05 GFOA $350.00 07-02-04 USO PC CHIEFVALUE FAX $442.00 MACHINE 06-09-04 SEARS POWER TOOL KiT $230.84 06-13-04 RED WING HOTEL RESERVATION $591.32 06-13-04 RED WING HOTEL RESERVATION $603.38 07-02-04 JUBILEE FOODS LEMONS/LIMES $10.44 06-22-04 RICKS MEETING $59,47 06-28-04 CITY GRILL,TASK FORCE MEETING $26.04 06-30-04 BREEZY POINT RESORT $480.00 07-05-04 CUB FOODS TASK FORCE $139.07 MEETING 10100 Total $4,823.85 7/31/2004 -2375- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: July 2004 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $2,744.46 $1,425.54 $321.70 $321.71 $10.44 $4,823.85 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $4,823.85 $4,823.85 07/26/04 11:00 AM Page 2 -2376- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 07/28/04 7:40 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: July 2004 Batch Name 072804SUE User Dollar Amt $9,581.24 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $9,581.24 $0.00 In Balance Refer 72804 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-04 MUSIC SERVICE $92.90 Invoice A450635 7/28/2004 T ...... te 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $92.90 ransac~ u. u,~ Refer 72804 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PAR Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment invoice 072804 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 7/28/2004 06-19-04 THRU 07-18-04 612-221-6740 BERENT,BRIAN 06-19-04 THRU 07-18-04 612-221-6974 TAFFE,JOHN 06-19-04 THRU 07-18-04 612-221-6812 #15 FACKLER,JIM $32.32 $13.78 $80.01 06-19-04 THRU 07-18-04 612-221-6813 HOFF,KATIE 06-19-04 THRU 07-18-04 612-221-8385 SWARTZER,BRIAN $30.84 $33.39 06-19-04 THRU 07-18-04 612-282-5889 SIMONEAU,MATT $65.55 06-19-04 TH RU 07-18-04 612-363-5883 NORLANDER,JILL $27.02 PARKS EQUIPMENT $129.58 10100 Total $412.49 Refer 72804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 VERIZON WIRELESS (P/W) _ E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 07-10-04 CELL PHONES $184.57 7/27/2004 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 07-10-04 CELL PHONES $102.37 7/27/2004 E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 07-10-04 CELL PHONES $102.37 7/27/2004 G 101-22816 Personal Cell Phone 07-10-04 CELL PHONES $287.88 7/27/2004 Transact on Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $677.19 Refer 72804 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 06-04 #2245-301-939 $1,247.99 Invoice 072804 7/28/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities 06-04#0466-607-223 $21.99 Invoice 072804 7/28/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 06-04 #0217-606-329 $3,000.21 Invoice 072804 7/28/2004 -2377- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 07/28/04 7:40 AM Payments Page 2 Current Period: July 2004 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Cash Payment Invoice 072804 Transaction Date E 101-45200-381 Etectdc Utilities 7/28/2004 E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 7/28/2004 E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities 7/28/2004 E 602-49450-381 Electdc Utilities 7/28/2004 E 602-49450-381 Electdc Utilities 7/28/2004 E 101 --43100-381 Electric Utilities 7/28/2004 7/21/2004 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 06-04 #0047-005-229 $232.32 06-04 #0864-508-832 $151.84 06-04 #0864-508-832 $151.84 06-04 #0864-508-832 $151.84 06-04 ¢f-O018-802-634 $3,165.82 06-04 #0009-604-835 $274.81 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,398.66 10100 Wells Fargo $2,783.O5 $3O.84 $254.21 $6,420.24 $92.90 $9,581.24 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $9,581.24 $9,581.24 -2378- CiTY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: August 2004 08~04~04 11:35 AM Page 1 Batch Name Refer 84040 Cash Payment Invoice 080404 080404SUE User Dollar Amt $62,868.33 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $62,868.33 $o.oo CRYSTEEL DISTRIBUTING, INC. E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA TRUCK, 1-TON PLOW 8/4/2004 PO 18339 In Balance $24,175.50 Transaction Date 8,4,2004 Wells Fargo Refer 80404 ELK RIVER FORD, INCORPORATE Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA TRUCK FORD 2004 F450 $28,863.00 Invoice 25372 8/2/2004 PO 18338 10100 Total $28,863.00 Refer 80404 FACK£ER, JAMES Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT 10100 $104.49 Total $104.49 Refer 80404 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 06-04 472-0600 $984.04 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 06-04 472-0600 $410.02 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 06-04 472-0600 $246.02 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 07-04 472-0635 $720.00 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 07-04 472-0635 $720.00 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 07-04 472-0635 $720.01 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Transact on Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,800.09 Refer 80404 LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow CASE #04-0579 BOOKING #7194 $150.00 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 10100 Total $150.00 Refer 80404 MOUND POST OFFICE Cash Payment E 101-41110-322 Postage Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Refer 80404 NELSON, JO¥OE Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 FALL NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 10100 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENTS $709.44 Total $709.44 $104.31 Total $104.31 ' Refer 80404 NICCUM, DANIEL Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT Wells Fargo 10100 $36.10 Total $36.10 -2379- i 1,. . II .11~ City of Mound 08/04/0411:35 AM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Refer 80404 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (P/W Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $28.23 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,579.57 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $637.91 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $173.24 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2 418 95 Refer 80404 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR ' Cash Payment E 101-41310-212 Motor Fuels THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $21.00 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $21.00 ~eier 80~04 ~E~OwA~,S~pERA~ERiCA Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $2,115.20 Invoice 0804046/4/2004 Transaction Date 81312004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,115.20 Refer 80404 SuSsMAN MicHAEL E //"~, Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $180.10 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Refer 80404 WIDMER DENic WellsFargo 10100 Total $180.10 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $190.15 Invoice 080404 8/4/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $190.15 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $60,371.15 $246.O2 $1,357.91 $893.25 $62,868.33 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $62,868.33 $62,868.33 -2380- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 08/05/04 3:15 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2004 Batch Name 080504SUE Payments User Dollar Amt $3,540.60 Computer Dollar Amt $3,540.60 Refer 80504 AUTOMATED IRRIGATION, INCOR Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs invoice A-1569 7/28/2004 Transaction Date 8/5/2004 Refer 80504 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow Invoice 080504 8/5/2004 $0.00 In Balance 4714 HANOVER PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT $318.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $318.00 04-2346 BOOKING #7256 SCHULTZ, PATRICK $200.00 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 80504 DAVIS, KARY _ Cash Payment G 101-22950 4721 Aberdeen Rd. #03-34 S CLOSE ESCROW #03-34 $245.50 Invoice 080504 8/5/2004 Transact on Date 8/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ~!a! ?~5.50 Refer 80504 DRIVER AND VEHICLE SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA FORD 1-TON PLOW TRUCK LICENSE $1,909.59 Invoice 080504 8/5/2004 T ..... ~-finn Date 8/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,909.59 Refer 80504 NELSON, JOYCE Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $81.89 Invoice 080504 8/5/2004 Refer 80504 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (PAR Cash Payment E 101-41310-212 Motor Fuels $21.00 Invoice 080504 8/5/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels $764.62 Invoice 080504 8/5/2004 Transaction Date 8/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $785.62 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $3,540.60 $3,540.60 THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES THRU 07-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $3,540.60 Total $3,540.60 -2381 - C~TY OF MOUND City of Mound 08105104 4:19 PM Payments Page Current Period: August 2004 Batch Name 081004SUE User Dollar Amt $351,944.55 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $351,944.55 $0.00 In Balance Refer 81004 ALERT-ALL CORPORATION ~ Cash Payment E 222-42260-217 Fire Prevention Supplies CHILDRENS FIRE HATS $685.44 Invoice 4070050 7/9/2004 PO 18509 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $685.44 Refer 81004 AMERICAN RED CROSS MPLS AR Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves FNCPR PROVIDER FEE Invoice 68825 7/15/2004 $50.00 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $50.00 Refer 8i00~ ~RC~ Wl~E~sS Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies PAGERS Invoice N3457459G 7/1712004 PO 18405 $429.34 Transaction Date 7~29~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $429.34 Refer 81004 ARcTiOG~ciERPREMiuMi~E Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438420607 7~24/2004 $69.48 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE invoice 7~24~2004 $178.38 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438420813 7/24/2004 $132~39 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE invoice 438421307 7/24/2004 $97.02 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438421205 7/24/2004 $40.68 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438420115 7/24/2004 $155.13 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438421513 7/24/2004 $161.70 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CREDIT-ICE Invoice XXXXX 7/24/2004 -$82.11 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $752.67 Refer 81004 AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 06-04 WATER SERVICE Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 $60.55 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60~55 Refer 81004 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 30168900 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 30134700 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R Invoice 38699400 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 30182800 7/23/2004 LIQUOR $3,686.25 WINE $91.00 MERCHANDISE $68.97 LIQUOR $1,086.40 -2382- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 30178200 7~23~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE Invoice 38743500 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 30239000 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 30254700 7/23/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 08~05~04 4:19 PM Page 2 $2,216.10 $48.37 $484.25 $2,233.75 10100 Total $9,915.09 Refer 81004 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 429697 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 429697 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 429697 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous COFFEE Invoice 429697 7/21/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo $28.00 $14,00 $14.00 $14.00 10100 Total $70.00 Refer 81004 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC. Cash Payment Invoice 081004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 8/10/2004 E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 8/10~2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Refer 81004 BOLES, DAVID B. JR. Cash Payment R 101-34110 Depot Rental Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 07-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 07-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 07-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 07-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 07-04 GARBAGE SERVICE 07-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $173.22 $33.24 $33.24 $33.25 $22.15 $19.42 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $314.52 REFUND DEPOT PAYMENT $29.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29.00 Refer 81004 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUP Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply LIGHT BULBS $108.31 invoice 93794959 8/10/2004 PO 18526 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.31 Refer 81004 BRWENTERPRISES $503.30 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE invoice 10367 7/27/2004 T ...... 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~5~3.30 ransac[Ion Refer 81004 BUSINESS IMAGES BY RHINO -2383- City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 PM Payments Page 3 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 101.43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING Invoice 51804 8/10/2004 $328.44 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING Invoice 51804 8/10/2004 $328.44 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING Invoice 51804 8/10/2004 $328.45 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $685 00 refe, 81004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $985.33 Refer 81004 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE ' Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair HITCH,BALL,SWITCH $102.66 Invoice N34270 6/12/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair ATTACHMENT TAPE Invoice N35805 6/12/2004 $75.93 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair BEAD SEALER Invoice N36839 7/20/2004 $9.57 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $188.16 Refer 81004 CATAND FIDDLE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 39165 7/22/2004 $555.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 39002 7/22/2004 $130.00 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Cash Payment Invoice D273429 Cash Payment Invoice D273071 Cash Payment Invoice D273054 Cash Payment Invoice D270815 Cash Payment Invoice Transaction Date Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 07-04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $5,020.88 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,020.88 Refer 81004 CHAMp;ONAUT~ E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery OUTLET POWER STRIP $11.70 7/29/2004 E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply CREDIT-BATTERY CORE 712912004 ~$5.33 E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply BATTERY CORE $91.58 7/29/2004 E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair MlSC HOSE 7/29/2004 $1.25 E 101.45200.409 Other Equipment Repair MISC HOSE 7/29/2004 $10.54 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.74 Refer81004 CHIEF OF POLICE, ASSOC HENNE Cash Payment Invoice 081004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 8/10/2004 PO 18440 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 8/10/2004 PO 18440 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Yraining 8/10/2004 PO 18440 09-01-04 ONLINE SEARCHES/TECHNIQUES,SWANSON $75.00 10-22-04 INTERVIEW/INTERROGATION, PETZ $75.00 10-22-04 I NTERVIEW/INTEROGATiON, SCHWALBE $75.00 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $225,00 -2384- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound o81o51o4 4:19 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing 07-24-04 BLDG OFFICIAL AD Invoice 36291 7/24/2004 $77.05 Refer 81004 CLIN-NET SOLUTIONS LLC Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services 07-07-04 SKINNER,GREG $12.66 Invoice 815445 7/16/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-305 Medical Services 07-07-04 SKINNER,GREG $12.66 Invoice 815445 7/16/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical Services 07-07-04 SKINNER,GREG $12.68 Invoice 815445 711612004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services 07-12-04 GEISE,LEE $38.00 Invoice 815445 7/16/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services 07-08-04 HEITZ $38.00 Invoice 815773 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-305 Medical Services 07-07-04 FACKLER $38.00 Invoice 815773 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-305 Medical Services 07-08-04 BERENT $38.00 Invoice 815773 7/23/2004 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $190.00 Refer 81004 COLLISION CORNER Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WINDOW TINT 2001 FORD TAURUS $215.00 Invoice 2916 7/23/2004 PO 18432 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $215.00 Refer 81004 CONCRETE CUTTING AND CORIN Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply CHOP SAW PARTS $108.32 invoice 24936 7/10/2004 PO 18578 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials OIL/CHAINS $32.48 Invoice 24941 7/10/2004 PO 18579 10100 Total $140.80 Refer 81004 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN Cash Payment E 427-43121-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 2649525 7/26/2004 07-23-04 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT 10100 Total $124.15 $124.15 Refer 81004 COVERALL CLEANING CONCEPTS Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 08-04 CLEANING SERVICE $1,166.18 Invoice 87835 8/1/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services 08-04 CLEANING SERVICE $756.58 Invoice 87835 8/1/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 08-04 CLEANING SERVICE $504.38 Invoice 87835 8/1/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-460 Janitorial Services 08-04 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 Invoice 87835 8/1/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-460 Janitorial Services 08-04 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 Invoice 87835 81112004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-460 Janitorial Services 08-04 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 Invoice 87835 8/1/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 08-04 CLEANING SERVICE $199.15 Invoice 87835 8/1/2004 -2385- ............ '-..' .., City of Mound 06/o5/o4 4:19 PM Payments Page5 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2 764 74 Refer 81004 CRETE WORKS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Contract GRANDVIEW/MONMOUTH CURB $1,080.00 invoice 081004 7/16/2004 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,080.00 Refer 81004 CRIME PREVENTION INSTITUTE N Cash Payment E 101.42110-434 Conference & Trainin(~ 10-18-04 PREVENTION THRU ENV DESIGN,NICCUM invoice 081004 8/10/2004 PO 18436 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.00 Refer 81004 DAY DISTRiBUTING cOMPANy Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 274425 7/27/2004 $3,549.80 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 8432 7/27/2004 $141.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 273454 7/27/2004 $1,338.80 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 273455 7/27/2004 $53.60 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 275387 7/27/2004 $101.30 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER invoice 275386 7/27/2004 $1,073.85 $500.00 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,258.35 $CKMAS-rERS Cash Payment E 281-45210-440 Other Contractual Servic RAISE DOCK SECTIONS $1,380.00 Invoice 200678 6/14/2004 Transaction Date 81312004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $1,380 00 Refer 8i004 DuA~;S 6~E~/i~ Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials LP GAS Invoice 213280 8/10/2004 $26.66 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials LP GAS Invoice 213280 8/10/2004 $26.66 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials LP GAS Invoice 213280 8/10/2004 $26.68 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 44835 7/22/2004 $81.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 538458 7/22/2004 $116,50 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 223847 7/22/2004 $2,439.15 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER nvoice 223951 7/22/2004 $2,014.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 538458 7/22/2004 $116,50 -2386- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: August 2004 Transact on Date 7/27~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,767.15 Refer 81004 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs PAYMENT REQUEST NO.8 $38,725.80 Invoice 081005 8/10/2004 Transact on Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3~i-~5-80 Refer 81104 ESS BROTHERS AND SONS, INCO Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply NO FLOW INFLOW DISH $44.73 Invoice GG2411 6/11/2004 Refer 81004 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment Invoice 223430 E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 7/24/2004 Wells Fargo $64.00 Refer 81004 FIRE CONTROL EXTINGUISHER Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies invoice 80130 8/1012004 10100 Total $64.00 Refer 81004 Cash Payment Invoice 081004 2004 ANNUAL SERVICE 10100 10100 FISH, ALISON G 101-22987 4679 Hampton Rd #04-11 Fi REFUND ESCROW 8/10/2004 Refer 81004 FRONTLINE PLUS FIRE AND RESC E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/20/2004 PO 18506 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/20/2004 PO 18083 LADDERS, ALUMINUM RED/BLUE SUPER LED 10100 Cash Payment Invoice 9140 Cash Payment Invoice XXXX Refer 81004 G & K SERVICES E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 8/10/2004 E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 07-20-04 MATS 8/10/2004 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 03-30-04 MATS 8/10/2004 07-06-04 UNIFORMS 07-06-04 UNIFORMS 07-06-04 UNIFORMS 07-06-04 MATS 07-06-04 MATS 07-06-04 MATS 07-06-04 MATS $245.50 Total $245.50 $415.00 Cash Payment Invoice 6169746 Cash Payment Invoice 6169746 Cash Payment Invoice 6169746 Cash Payment invoice 6169746 Cash Payment Invoice 6169746 Cash Payment Invoice 6169746 Cash Payment invoice 6169732 Cash Payment Invoice 6182727 Cash Payment Invoice 6878246-B Total $415.00 Total $2,805.60 $192.44 $2,998.04 $58.42 $58.42 $58.42 $27.88 $27.88 $27.88 $109.42 $41.65 $46.16 -2387- City of Mound 08/05/04 4: 9 PM Payments Page 7 CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment invoice 6182725 Cash Payment Invoice 6169737 Cash Payment Invoice 6182715 Cash Payrnent, Invoice 6176204 Cash Payment Invoice 6176204 Cash Payment Invoice 6176204 Cash Payment Invoice 6176204 Cash Payment invoice 6176204 Cash Payment Invoice 6176204 Cash Payment Invoice 6195670 Cash Payment ~ Invoice 6182728 ' Cash Payment Invoice 6195668 Cash Payment Invoice 6182716 Cash Payment Invoice 6182726 Cash Payment Invoice 6182726 Cash Payment Invoice 6182726 Cash Payment Invoice 6182726 Cash Payment Invoice 6182726 Cash Payment Invoice 6182726 Cash Payment Invoice 6195671 Cash Payment Invoice 6189197 Cash Payment Invoice 6189197 Cash Payment Invoice 6189197 -- Cash Payment ,nvoice 6189197 Cash Payment invoice 6189197 Current Period: August 2004 · E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 07-20-04 MATS 8/10/2004 E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 8/10/2004 E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2OO4 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 08-03-04 MATS 8/10/2004 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 8/10/2004 E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 8/10/2004 E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 E 101-41910-4.60 Janitorial Services 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/10/2004 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 8/10/2004 07-06-04 MATS 07-20-04 mats 07-13-04 UNIFORMS 07-13-04 UNIFORMS 07-13-04 UNIFORMS 07-13-04 MATS 07-13-04 MATS 07-13-04 MATS 07-20-04 MATS 08-03-04 MATS 07-20~04 MATS 07-20-04 UNIFORMS 07-20-04 UNIFORMS 07-20-04 UNIFORMS 07-20-04 MATS 07-20-04 MATS 07-20-04 MATS 08-03-04 MATS 07-27-04 UNIFORMS 07-27-04 UNIFORMS 07-27-04 UNIFORMS 07-27-04 MATS 07-27-04 MATS $29.71 $38.55 $82,29 $40.37 $4O.37 $40.38 $38.43 $38.43 $38.43 $48.73 $35.33 $41.08 $38.55 $45.18 $45.18 $45.18 $21.50 $21.50 $21.50 $78.81 $35.49 $35.49 $35.49 $24.49 $24.49 -~:2388- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 6189197 City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 8 Payments Current Period: August 2004 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 07-27-04 MATS $24.49 8/10/2004 Total $1,465.57 Refer 81004 GAMETIME Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts SLIDE SECTIONS $403.98 Invoice 706322 7/26/2004 PO 18528 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $403.98 Refer 81004 GLASS PLUS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply PLEXI-GLASS FOR SIGN $79.88 Invoice 9723 7/30/2004 PO 18581 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $79.88 Refer 81006 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Cash Payment E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies 07-04 WATER SERVICE $22.37 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Refer 81104 GRAND PERE WINES, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $796.00 Invoice 621050 7/29/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $796.00 Refer 81004 GREEN WITH ENVY LAWN CARE Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic WEED CONTROL $799.82 Invoice 5419 6/13/2004 Refer 81004 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $413.87 Invoice 923067 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $471.51 Invoice 920921 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,377.95 invoice 920920 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $527.25 Invoice 920901 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$97.99 Invoice 644201 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$363.00 Invoice 644200 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$36.70 Invoice 643992 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $250.97 Invoice 924175 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,817,66 Invoice 924174 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $132.34 Invoice 924157 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$66.15 Invoice 644853 7/23/2004 - -2389- ~.~.~---_...~.~ City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 PM /~ ~ ~_ Payments Page9 C~TY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT--WiNE Invoice 644609 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR Invoice 644553 7/23/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 · ~ Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 81004 HANRAT~j~F Cash Payment G' 101-22983 1749 Bluebird Ln #04-08 Han REFUND ESCROW Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 -$581.80 -$143,04 Total $7,702,87 $245.00 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $245.00 Refer 81004 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 06-04 BOOKING FEE $1,696.08 Invoice 236 7/12/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,696.08 Refer 81004 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 06-04 ROOM AND BOARD $1,146.25 Invoice 000574 7/21/2004 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 146 25 Refer 81004 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 07-24-04 THRU 08-24-04 CQPIER $151.46 MAINTENANCE , Invoice 23344139 7/24/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.46 Refer 8i004 iNCRATEcH Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs CIPP LINERS BARTLETT $3,000.00 Invoice 0401360 6/24/2004 Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs CIPP LINERS BARTLETT $723.90 Invoice 0401360 6/24/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials PAINT,BLUE,GREEN $71.16 Invoice 0401310 6/24/2004 PO 18574 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 .... Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,795 06 Refer 8i00~ ;O~NS VARiE~~ ~ETS ' Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 07-22-04 EE APPRECIATION PARTY $122.68 Invoice 438039 8/10/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22808 Adopt A Green Space PLANTS Invoice 438046 8/10/2004 $25,56 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $148.24 Refer 81004 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1755256 7/21/2004 $442,64 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1755258 7/21/2004 $756.45 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1755257 7/21/2004 $29.99 '"'"Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $305.57 Invoice 1755255 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1758864 7/2112004 $1,380.00 -2390- _. CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 10 Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $418.94 Invoice 1758865 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,938.92 Invoice 1758866 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $59.98 Invoice 1758867 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $347.40 Invoice 1758868 7/21/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ~t,a! $8 679.89 Refer 81004 JOHNSON, JULIE Cash Payment G 101-22975 6185 Sinclair Rd #03-46 Plat REFUND ESCROW $7,383.25 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/312004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,383.25 Refer 81004 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 07-26-04 COUNCIL COOKIES $48.51 Invoice 081004 8/11/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 07-22-04 EE APPRECIATION PARTY $40.27 Invoice 081004 8/11/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $88.78 Refer 81004 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 06-04 MISC BILLABLE Invoice 62330-A1 7/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 06-04 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT Invoice 62330-A2 7/22/2004 Cash Payment Invoice 62330-B Cash Payment Invoice 62330-C Cash Payment Invoice 62330-D Cash Payment Invoice 62330-E Cash Payment Invoice 62401-A Cash Payment Invoice 62401-B Cash Payment Invoice 62401-C Cash Payment invoice 62401-D Cash Payment Invoice 62401-E Cash Payment Invoice 62401-F Cash Payment Invoice 62401-G Cash Payment Invoice 62401-H E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 E 401.46377-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 7/22/2004 G 101-22974 Bloomquist Hotel Developme 06-04 BLOOMQUIST HOTEL DEVEL 7/22/2004 E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 E 455-43255-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 E 609-49750-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 G 101-22988 Heritage Point Trailer Court 7/22/2004 E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 7/22/2004 06-04 REDEV PROJECT AREA 31 06-04 MUELLER LANSING DEVEL 06-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE 06-04 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT 06-04 MCES LIFT STATION 06-04 DREAMWOOD LAWSUIT 06-04 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY 06-04 BOLTT VS LIQUOR STORE 06-04 HALSTEAD POINTE TRAILER COURT 06-04 EXECUTIVE 06-04 ADMINISTRATIVE $44.00 $506.00 $863.5O $825.00 $777.50 $220.00 $986.37 $486.00 $798.00 $98.20 $6O.OO $24.00 $744.00 $54.00 CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 2265473 Cash Payment Invoice 2265473 Cash Payment Invoice 2265473 q'ransaction Date Cash Payment Invoice 62401-1 Cash Payment Invoice 62401-J 1 7/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-23004 3166/70 Westedge #04-20/2 Invoice 62401-J2 7/22/2004 Cash Payment G 101-22990 Mount Olive Church #04-12 Invoice 62401-J3 7/22/2004 E 101-41600-312 Legal Police 7/22/2004 G 101-22994 MHR Alternative Urban Area City of Mound Payments 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 11 Current Period: August 2004 06-04 JOINT AGREEMENT TASK FORCE $48.00 06-04 AUAR MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE 06-04 3170 WESTEDGE $04-20 06-04 5218 BARTLETT #04-12 Cash Payment G 101-23001 1599 Bluebird Ln #04-17 Vari 06-04 1599 BLUEBIRD #04-17 Invoice 62401-J4 7/22/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I 06-04 MlSC PLANNING/ZONING Invoice 62401-J5 7/22/2004 Cash Payment E 401-46590-300 Professional Srvs 06-04 NEW PfW PARKS BLDG Invoice 62330 7/22/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,707.31 Refer 81004 KOENIG AND SCHWERT Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2003/2004 CBD #14-117-24-44-0004 $574.50 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $574.50 Refer 81004 KURTM, JAMES Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions REIMBURSEMENT ROTARY $50.00 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 81004 LAKE MANAGEMENT, INC. Cash Payment E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 7 BEACH TREATMENTS $3,750.00 Invoice 22657 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maint Contract DUTCH LAKE TREATMENT $475.00 Invoice 22851 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,225.00 Refer 81004 LARSON PRINTING AND GRAPHIC Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2003/2004 CBD #13-117-24-33-0047 $310.82 Invoice 081004 6/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $310.82 Refer 81004 LAUER, ROBERT DR. Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2003/2004 CBD #13-117-24-33-0015 $785.55 Invoice 081004 ' 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $785.55 Refer 81004 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $175.58 7/28/2004 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $175.58 7/28/2004 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES $175.59 7/28/2004 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $526.75 $12.00 $42.00 $6O.0O $30.00 $1,602.74 $426.00 -2392- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 12 Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,440.00 Invoice 693737 7/23/2004 Cash Payment. E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $62.50 Invoice 693736 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $0.03 Invoice 694618 7/23/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $58.80 Invoice 694620 7~23~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,011.67 invoice 694619 7~23~2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $107.25 Invoice 691994 712312004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,891.80 Invoice 691993 712312004 Transaction Date 712612004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,572.05 Refer 81004 MARLIN°S TRUCKING DELIVERY E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-01-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $244.80 7/1/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-06-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $23,40 7/1/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-08-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $68.40 71112004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-09-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $63.00 7/1/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-12-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $11.70 7/1/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-15-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $103.50 7/1/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-19-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $7.20 71112004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-22-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $95.40 71112004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-27-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $24.30 7/1/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-29-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $206.10 71112004 Transaction Date 8~2~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $847.80 Refer 81004 MEISEL, PAT Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2003~2004 CBD #14-117-24-44-0006 $1,425.53 Invoice 081004 811012004 Cash Payment Invoice 14439 Cash Payment Invoice 14450 Cash Payment Invoice 14468 Cash Payment Invoice 14475 Cash Payment Invoice 14479 Cash Payment Invoice 14500 Cash Payment Invoice 14510 Cash Payment Invoice 14532 Cash Payment Invoice 14543 Cash Payment Invoice 14556 Refer 81104 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEM Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 42483 7/19/2004 PO 18418 LABELS, FILING FOLDERS $674.22 Refer 81004 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA Cash Payment E 609-49750-438 Licenses and Taxes Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 2004-2005 ANNUAL DUES $1,440.00 - 2393 City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 PM //~/~' ~' '~"'"~~t~. Page 13 .,,..- Payments CiTY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Transaction Date 8~3~2004 W~ll~ Far0o ~O~dO 'rota~ $4,44o.oo Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials ASPHALT EMULSION $217.26 Invoice 46039 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials ASPHALT EMULSION $233.55 Invoice 46110 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 101-4-3100-224 Street Maint Materials ASPHALT EMULSION $271.58 Invoice 45925 7/21/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $722.39 Refer 81004 MUELLER/LANSING PROPERTIES Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 2003/2004 CBD $2,297.12 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tote $2,297 12 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $213.00 Invoice 26718 7/22/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $213.00 Refer 8i004 NEXTE~. ~O~MUNic~A~i~'(poLi Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 06-19-04 THRU 07-18-04 CELL PHONES $348.63 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 ' Transaction Date 8/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $348.63 R~i~r ~1004 PAU~TiS~IDS~N~/iNE~O~PA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $175.00 Invoice 8042168 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $753.00 Invoice 8042426 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750~253 Wine For Resale WINE -$330.00 Invoice 8042726 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,073.94 Invoice 8041858 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $667.01 Invoice 8043058 7/21/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2 338.95 Refer 81004 PEDERs~' ~1 Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND WATER/SEWER $74.64 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 7/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $74 64 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $80.00 Invoice 64827035 7/21/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 81004 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC /,,""-,Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $25.00 t .Invoice 4094584 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $323.90 Invoice 2094583 7/21/2004 -2394- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 14 Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $168.80 Invoice 2094582 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $80,75 Invoice 2094585 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $186.15 Invoice 2097146 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,488.30 Invoice 2097147 712112004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,272.90 Refer 81004 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING . Cash Payment E 609.49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $645.50 Invoice 44931 7/27/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $23.81 Invoice 44222 7/27/2004 Transaction Date 7/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $669.31 Refer 81004 PLUNKETT'S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic JUL,AUG,SEPT PEST CONTROL $95.84 Invoice 356853 8/1/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.84 Refer 81004 PROTECTION ONE Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-01-04 THRU 10-31-04 FIRE ALARM $142.80 MAINTENANCE Invoice 081004 7/14/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-04 THRU 10-15-04 FIRE MONITORING $37.21 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-04 THRU 10-15-04 FIRE MONITORING $37.21 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-04 THRU 10-15-04 FIRE MONITORING $37.21 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $254.43 Refer 81004 PUBLIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT COM Cash Payment E 101-42110-409 Other Equipment Repair CALIBRATION RADAR UNITS $285.00 Invoice 821 7/28/2004 PO 18438 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $285,00 Refer 81004 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 431277-00 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $86.88 LIQUOR $703.70 Invoice 430928-00 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $455.25 Invoice 430918-00 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,065.44 Invoice 434351-00 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $77.10 Invoice 434341-00 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,915.35 Invoice 434340-00 7/21/2004 -2395- City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 15 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 81004 RANDY'S SANITATION Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $116.26 Invoice 1601 7/19/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-04 GARBAGE SERVICE $116.26 Invoice 1601 7/19/2004 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $232.52 Refer 81004 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 07-26-04 LEGAL AD $124.15 Invoice 2649525 7/26/2004 Project 14707 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $124 15 Refer 81004 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies AIR AND'OXYGEN $21.73 Invoice R06041052 6/30/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $21.73 Refer 81004 RIDGEVlEW MEDICAL, WACONIA Cash Payment E 222-42260-305 Medical Services HEALTH ASSESSMENTS $573.00 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $573.00 Refei 81004 sENTRY SysTEMS, iN~OR~ORAT Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-04 MONITORING SERVICES $22.21 Invoice 395797 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-04 SUPERVISED O/C'S $14.16 Invoice 395797 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 , , Wells Fargo 10100 Total $36.37 R;f;; 8i°°~ SHA~KE~ COMMu~iOATi°Ns, iN Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 07-31-04 PUBLICATION $12.50 Invoice 114139 7/23/2004 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12.50 Refer 81004 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal WlELAND PARK REMOVE TREE $852.00 Invoice 5104 7/30/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-533 Tree Removal 5420 BREEZY REMOVE TREES $399.38 Invoice 5093 7/30/2004 Transaction Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 251.38 Refer 81004 sOuTH ~KE biNN~T~NKA poL/C . Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 05-05-04 SOBRIETY TESTING,WlEBUSCH $20.00 Invoice 081004 7/14/2004 PO 18437 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $20 00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 338 7~27~2004 $412.00 Transaction Date 81312004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $412.00 Refer 81004 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Total $4,303.72 -2396- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 8303 Cash Payment invoice 8303 Cash Payment invoice 8292 E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts 7/14/2004 E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts 7/14/2004 E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA 7/14/2004 City of Mound Payments 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 16 Current Period: August 2004 C/H COND BODY $232.72 C/H COND BODY $232.72 LIFT STATIONS $685.11 Transaction Date 7/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,150.55 Refer 81104 STREICHER'S Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts STROBE TUBE $205.28 Invoice 1202302 7/15/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies NIK KITS $178.49 invoice 1203369 7/15/2004 PO 18434 Transaction Date 7/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $383.77 Refer 81004 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $506.00 Invoice 33404 7/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,551.35 Invoice 342219 7/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $573.00 Invoice 342711 7/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale BEER $148.00 Invoice 342214 7/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale BEER $7,136.55 Invoice 342220 7/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $184.85 Invoice 341471 7/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,404.85 invoice 341472 7/26/2004 Transaction Date 7/26/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,504.60 Refer 81004 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies REGISTER PAPER ROLLS $118.19 Invoice 17016 8/2/2004 Refer 81004 TRI-STA TE PUMP AND CONTOL, I Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 23593 7/22/2004 SEAL/O-RING $542.40 Refer 81004 TROPHIES BY LINDA Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 2003 YEAR END AWARDS $85.20 Invoice 11606 5/15/2004 PO 18429 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 2003 YEAR END AWARDS $36.21 Invoice 11549 5/15/2004 PO 18429 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous 2003 YEAR END AWARDS .$9.26 invoice 11826 5/15/2004 PO 18249 Refer 81104 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP -2397- City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 17 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies REPAIR DOOR#2 Invoice 218021 6/7/2004 $38,00 Cash Payment E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies REPAIR DOOR #2 Invoice 218021 6/7/2004 $38.00 Cash Payment E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies REPAIR DOOR #2 Invoice 218021 6/7/2004 $38.00 Transaction Date 7/22/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -- $114.00 Refer 81004 T~i~'CiT~O~i~ SuP~L~ Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435859-0 8/10~2004 $2.29 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435859-0 8/10/2004 $2.29 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435859-0 8/10/2004 $2.29 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435859-0 8/1012004 $2.29 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435859-0 8/10/2004 $2.29 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435859-0 8110~2004 $0.79 ? ""% Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies , Invoice 435859-0 8/10/2004 $1.53 Cash Payment E 602.49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435859-0 8/10/2004 $1.53 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 432799-0 8/10/2004 $0.00 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 432799-0 8/10/2004 $0.00 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 432799-0 811012004 $0.00 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies AUDIO CASSETTE Invoice 433397-0 8/10/2004 $52.72 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3,09 Invoice 432880-0 8/10~2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office. Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.09 Invoice 432880-0 8/1012004 Cash Payment E 101-42400.200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3 09 Invoice 432880-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.09 Invoice 432880-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $3.09 Invoice 432880-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.04 Invoice 432880-0 8110/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2 06 Invoice 432880-0 8/10/2004 ~/"'~ Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.06 Invoice 432880-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies RETURN TACK BOARD Invoice 431380-0 8/10/2004 -$7,44 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE -2398- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 431380-0 8/10~2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies invoice 431380-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 434261-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 434161-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435510-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies invoice 434626-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 436107-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 435024-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 433416-0 8/10/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 433416-0 8/10/2004 City of Mound Payments Current Period: August 2004 RETURN TACK BOARD RETURN TACK BOARD HIGHLIGHTERS INK JET CARTRIDGE MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES CALCULATOR PAPER CLIPS,ETC INK JET CARTRIDGE MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES TONER TONER 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 18 -$7.44 -$7.45 $24.50 $81.8O $13.35 $13.35 $13.35 $t3.35 $13,35 $4.48 $8.90 $8.9O $146.82 $172.67 $81.64 $4.68 $4.68 $4.68 $4.68 $4.68 $1.56 $3.13 $3.13 $99.67 $99.67 -2399- - ~~___.~[-_~ City of Mound 08/05/04 4:19 pM Page 19 /// Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies TONER Invoice 433416-0 8/10/2004 $99.68 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies LAMINATE POUCH $51.34 Invoice 434044-0 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/4/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1 044 34 Refer ~io~'~ " ~i~l~ Ll~i~-~ Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves LAPEL MIC W/CLEAR TUBE $89.4t Invoice 231311 7/20/2004 PO 18431 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ............ ............ ............... ~. .... Total $89.41 Refer 81004 VALLEYPAVING INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs PAYMENT REQUEST#3 $168,868.32 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 Transaction Date 8/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $168 868 32 Refer 81004 WAGNER, CAROL '~ · Cash Payment R 601-37144 Sales of Meters & Reader- REFUND METER Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 $100.00 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Cash Payment R 601-36200 Miscellaneous Revenues REFUND WATER/SEWER $335.62 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 'Transaction Date 8/3/2004 ..... Wells Fargo 10100 Total $335 62 Refer 81004 wEIST, ~TH~ ..... Cash Payment E 222-42260-322 Postage REIMBURSE POSTAGE Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 $4.30 Transaction Date 8/3/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ................ ' .................... .............. .......... $4,30 Refer 81004 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 32136-00 7/22/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 31772-00 7/22/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 32502-00 7/22/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Refer 81004 WINE MERCHANTS WINE $524.75 CREDIT-WINE -$88~00 WINE $328.05 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $764.80 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 101077 7/21/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 101584 7/21/2004 Transaction Date 7/27/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 81004 WOCKEN, MICHAEL $972.00 $861.70 10100 Total $1,833.70 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery REIMBURSE SUPPLIES Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 $52.60 Transaction Date 7/29/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 ..................... , Total $52.60 Refer 81004 XCEL ENERGY ' ~ Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electdc Utilities 07-04 #0895-951-498-209 Invoice 081004 8/10/2004 $1,321.03 -2400- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/05/04 4:19 PM Page 20 Current Period: August 2004 Transact on Date 8/2/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Tota $! .3.~! .03 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 427 SEAL COAT FUND 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $43,5O8.14 $5,654.89 $1,793.38 $213,777.74 $124.15 $1,349.50 $1,911.69 $2,602.59 $81,222.47 $351,944.55 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $351,944.55 $351,944.55 -2401 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES AS RECOMMENDED FOR THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION SEPTEMBER 14, 2004 & NOVEMBER 2, 2004 BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the following list of election judges for the Primary Election September 14, 2004 and the General Election November 2, 2004: Adams, Eugene Alness, Cindy Antonsen, Julia Bryant, Holly Champine, Chuck Dascher, Sharon Fleming, Dean Garden, Jennifer Gleeson, Frank Glister, Becky Hanson, Patricia Hartman, David Hasse, Cklair Howard, Katie Hunt, Anne Koening, Edythe Kohls, Patricia Leidiger, Jim Linquist, Kris Marshall, Paul McNelis, Norma Melsness, Larry Metz, Jeanette Metz, Theodore Morton, Cindy Mueller, Mike Murphy, Kathy Norberg, Duane O'Brien, Dotty Randall, Leland Rasmussen, Tom Rice, Kathy Richter, Ella Roberts, Collette Roehl, Joetta Schwalbe, Deloris Schwalbe, Sue Schwalbe, Vern Schwingler, Ann Slechta, Mark Smith Weiss, Gretchen Sobraske, John Sullivan, Jim Sundberg, Mary Lou Svobodny, Ray Todd, Mary Tower, Bruce Adopted by the City Council this day of ,2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2402- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-__ RESOLUTION APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes 203B.13 allows for the establishment of an Absentee Ballot Board to process absentee ballots for the primary and general elections; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City of Mound to exercise this option as .stated in the above statute; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby appoint an Absentee Ballot Board as provided for in Minnesota State Statutes 203B13. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it has been determined, based on the number of absentee ballots cast in the primary and general election of 2002, that two board members of different major political parties is sufficient. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the members of the Absentee Ballot Board for the primary and general election by hereby named as Sue Schwalbe and Jodi Rahn. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of August, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2403- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith 8/5/2004 MEP Grant Agreement If the Council recalls, the City was awarded an $80,000 Metropolitan Environmental Partnership (MEP) Grant in October 2003 for the development and implementation of innovative stormwater strategies for the MHRD project in downtown Mound. As part of the grant requirements, the City and MHRD were required to prepare a work plan which is part of the Grant Agreement between the Metropolitan Council and the City of Mound. As the work plan has received final approval by the Metropolitan Council Staff, the City must now execute a Grant Agreement to proceed with the project. For your review and consideration, a resolution has been prepared to authorize the City Manager to sign the Grant Agreement with the Metropolitan Council for the project. -2404- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE METROPOLITAN ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSHIP (MEP) GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City of Mound is undertaking redevelopment efforts in its downtown area and has entered into a preliminary development agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development (MHRD) for the development of the Lost Lake, Auditor's Road, and Lake Langdon Districts; and WHEREAS, to assist with the funding of the downtown redevelopment project, the City of Mound submitted and was awarded a Metropolitan Environmental Partnership (MEP) grant from the Metropolitan Council in the amount of $80,000 for the development and implementation of innovative stormwater strategies for the MHRD project in downtown Mound; and WHEREAS, as part of the grant process, a Work Plan was required for the project which is a component of the Grant Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Work Plan has received approval from the MEP Grants Administrator therefore the Grant Agreement is complete and requires execution from the City of Mound. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, the City hereby accepts the Metropolitan Environmental Partnership (MEP) grant and hereby authorizes the City Manager to sign the Grant Agreement with the Metropolitan Council. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: -2405- Adopted by the City Council this August 10, 2004. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter -2406- Contract No: ~G2004--096 iVIETROPOLITAN ENVIRONMENTAL PARTNERSltlP GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL THE CITY OF MOUND THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Metropolitan Council (the "Council") and the City of Mound (the "Grantee"), each acting by and through its duly authorized officers. WItEREAS, on November 12, 1998, the Council approved an Environmental Partnership Mernorandum of Understanding which commits the Council to establish a program to provide financial assistance to reduce, control, and prevent nonpoint sources of pollution to metropolitan area lakes, rivers amd streams, with a focus on the Mississippi, Saint Croix, and Minnesota Rivers; and WHEREAS, pursuant to this commitment, the Council has established the Metropolitan Environmental Partnership ("MEP") Grant Program which provides grants to implement and evaluate project~4 designed to address nonpoint source pollution problems or control measures; and WItEREAS, the Grantee has submitted an applicaiion for, and is eligible to receive, a MEP Program Grant; and WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed Grantee' s application and desires to assist the Grantee by the award of a MEP Program Grant. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council and the Grantee agree as follows: I. GRANTEE PERFORMANCE OF GRAzNT PROJECT 1.01 Grant Project Activities. The Grantee agrees to perform and complete in a satisfactory and proper manner the grant project as described in the Grantee's application for grant assistance, incorporated ia this agreement by reference, and ia accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. Specifically, the Grantee agrees to perform the Work Plan activities described in Exhibit A, which is attached to and incorporated in this agreement. The Grantee may engage contractors to perform Work Program activities with prior approval of the Council. However, the Grantee retains primary responsibility to the Council for performance of the grant proj eot. 1.02 Material Representations. The Grantee agrees that all representations contained ia its application for grant assistance are material representations of fact upon which the Council relied in awarding this grant and are incorporated in this agreement by reference. H. AUTHORIZED USE OF GR.43XlT PROCEEDS XND MATCHING FUNDS 2.01 Authorized Uses. The Grantee is authorized to use the grant funds only ia payment of the line item costs, with no greater than a ten percent (10%) variance from the budgeted line item cost, as specified ia Exhibit B which is attached to and incorporated ia this agreement. No other use of grant funds is permitted. Grant and matching funds may be used only for costs directly associated arith grant project activities or to prepare the Work Plan (Exhibit A). -2407- 2.02 Unauthorized Uses of Grant Proceeds. Grant funds cannot be used to purcha, se land, buildings, or other interests in real property, or to pay overhead or indirect costs, legal fees, oxpermit, license, or other authorization fees, unless specifically approved in advance by the Council's (3rant Manager. 2.03 Reversion of Unexpended Funds. All funds granted by the Council under thi,~ agreement that have not been expended for grant activities taking place during the Project Activity Period shall revert to the Council. 2.04 Project Equipment and Supplies. Grant and matching funds may be used to purchase or lease equipment, machinery, supplies, or other personal property directly necessary to conduct the grant project. The Grantee will comply with the personal property management requirements described in paragraph 7.11 of this agreement. III. GRANT AMOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION 3.01 Total Grant Amount. The Council shall pay to the Grantee a Total Grant Amount of $80,000. Provided, however, that in no event will the Council's obligation under this agreement exceed the lesser of: a. the Total Grant Amount of $80,000; or, b. seventy-five percent (75%) of actual total grant project expenditures. The Council shall bear no responsibility for cost overruns which may be incurred by the Grantee in performance of the grant project. 3.02 Grantee's Match. The Grantee has an obligation under this grant agreement to share in the costs of the project by providing at least a twenty-five percent (25%) cash or in-kind match. Accordingly, the Grantee agrees to provide at least $26,667 in matching funds during the Proj eot Activity Period. The Grantee agrees that there will be no reduction in the monetary amount of match unless there is at the same time a proportionate reduction in the Total Grant Amount. 3.03 Distribution of Grant Funds. Grant funds will be distributed by the Council as follows: Along with each quarterly report as provided in paragraph 5.01, Grantee shall submit a reimbursement request for all expenditures made during the quarter in accordance with the grant project. The reimbursement request must include a summary itemization of expenditures for which reimbursement is requested. Full documentation evidencing the expenditures, as described in paragraph 4.01, will be available for audit on the Grantee's premises upon request, in accordance with paragraph 4.03. b. Reimbursable expenditures include only: 1. Direct staff costs figured on the current hourly rates of pay for aH personnel employed by the Grantee in providing services for the grant project for the hours actuall_y, worked and paid to the personnel; and an amount in compensation for such employees fringe benefits attributable and allocable to such hours. 2. Costs for equipment, Supplies, and subcontracted services used in the grant project. To the extent feasible, such equipment, supplies, and services must be obtained through competitive quotes, competitive bidding, or other competitive process that gives assurance that the costs incurred are reasonable. -2- -2408- :- Upon review and approval of the reimbursement request, the Council will distribute to the Grantee the approved reimbursement request amount. However, no payment will be made which would cause distribution of grant funds to exceed the limits in section 3.01. No payment will be made if the Grantee is not current in its reporting requirements under article V. Distribution of any funds or approval of any report is not to be construed as a Council waiver of any Grantee noncompliance with this agreement. IV. ACCOUNTING AND RECORD REQUIREMENTS 4.01 Documentation of Project Costs and Income. All costs charged to the grant project, whether paid with grant proceeds or charged as the Grantee's match, must be supported by pre)per documentation, including properly executed payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, receipts for expenses, or vouchers, evidencing in detail the nature and propriety of the charges. 4.02 Accounts and Records. The Grantee agrees to establish and maintain accurate, detailed, and complete separate accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all grant funds and the Grantee's Match required by this agreement, including all project documents, financial records, supporting documentation, and the property records required by paragraph 7.11. These project accounts and records shall be retained intact by the Grantee for at least six (6) years following the end of the Grant Period set forth in paragraph 6.02, below. Records relating to the installation, operation, and maintenance of best management practices must be maintained for at least three (3) years beyond the design or useful life whichever is longer. These requirements shall survive closeout of the grant agreement. 4.03 Audit. The Grantee agrees to keep and maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence pertinent to its performance under this agreement in accordance with generally accepted accom~ting principles and practices, consistently applied. Such books, records, documents and other evidence will be maintained until the latest of: a. Complete Performance of this agreement; or b. Six (6) years following the Grant Period; or c. If any litigation, claim, or audit is commenced during said six (6) year period, when all such litigation, claims or audits have been resolved. During the time of such maintenance, authorized representatives of the Council (and the Legislative Auditor and/or State Auditor in accordance with Minn. Stat. 16C.05, subdivision 5) will have access to all such books, records, documents, accounting practices and procedures, and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying during normal business hours. The Grantee will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. These requirements shall survive closeout of the grant agreement. V. REPORTING AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 5.01 Quarterly Reports. Grantee shall submit quarterly reports to the Council for review and approval. Each quarterly report is due within thirty (30) days after the end of each calendar quarter. Each quarterly report shall include a detailed summary of completed work activities and project expenditures, including a comparison of actual activities and expenditures against planned activities and projected expenditures. The Council may prescribe the format of such reports. -3- -2409- 5.02 Final Report. Upon completion of the project and not later than two (2) montl~ after the end of the Project Activity Period, the Grantee must submit a fmal report for Council review and approval clesedblng the aetlvltles and expenditures for the project and containing a final ae'co'unting of grant and matching expenditures. The fmal report must include a list of project personal property as required by paragraph 7.11. 5.03 Content of Reports. The Grantee agrees to report completely anc[to provide the Council. with any additional or follow-up information as may be requested by Council staff. 5.04 Copies. The Grantee agrees to provide copies of the reports specified in paragraphs 5.01 and 5.02 to organizations and individuals upon request during the Grant Period. 5.05 Other Monitoring Activities. To assist the Council in monitoring compliance with the grant agreement, the Grantee agrees to attend Grantee meetings as requested by Council staff' and to permit site visits by Council staff, during business hours, upon reasonable notice. The Grantee agrees to submit to the Council a copy of any promotional information regarding the grant project disseminated by the Grantee during the Grant Period. 5.06 Changed Conditions. The Grantee agrees to notify the Council immediately o£any change in conditions, local law, or any other event that may affect the Grantee's ability to perform the grant project in accordance with the terms of this agreement. VI. TI_MING REQUIREMENTS 6.01 Project Activity Period. The Grantee agrees to complete the work program activities described in Exhibit A by no later than December 31, 2007 (the "Project Activity Period" end date). Grant funds may not be used by Grantee to reimburse costs for any project activities taking place before this agreement is effective or after the end of the Project Activity Period. However, grant funds may be used by Grantee to reimburse costs for Work Plan (Exhibit A) preparation activities which occurred after receipt by Grantee of written notice from the Council of the award of this grant but before the effective date of this agreement. 6.02 Grant Period. The Grant Period shall extend from the effective date of this agreement to a date three (3) months following the end of the Project Activity Period, to permit closeout of the grant agreement. VII. GENERAL CONDITIONS 7.01 Amendments. The terms of this agreement may be changed only by mutual agreement of the parties. Such changes shall be effective only upon the execution of written amendments signed by authorized officers of the parties to this agreement. 7.02 Termination by Council. The Council may terminate this grant agreement at any time by providing Grantee written notice of such termination at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such termination. Upon such term/nation Grantee shall be entitled to compensation for grant project activities in accordance with this grant agreement which wkre incurred prior to the effective date of the termination, not exceeding the Total Grant Amount. 7.03 Noncompliance by Grantee. If the Council finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the Council may term/nate the agreement at any time following seven (7) days' written notice to the Grantee and upon failure of the Grantee to cure the default within the seven-day period. If the Council finds that the Grantee's noncompliance is willful and unreasonable, the -4- - 241 O- Council may terminate or rescind this agreement and require the Grantee to repay the grant funds in full or in a portion determined by the Council. Nothing herein shall be construed so as to limit the Council's legal remedies to recover grant funds. 7.04 Unauthorized Use of Grant Proceeds. Upon a finding by Council staff that the Grantee has made an unauthorized or undocumented use of grant proceeds, and upon a demand for repayment issued by the Council, the Grantee agrees to promptly repay, such amounts .to .the Council 7.05 Indemnification. The Grantee assumes liability for and agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Council, its members, officers, employees and agents, from and against all losses, damages, expenses, liability, claims, suits, or demands, including without limitation attorney's fees, arising out of, resulting from, or relating to the performance of the grant project by Grantee or Grantee's employees, agents, or subcontractors. 7.06 Public Data. The Grantee agrees that the results of the grant project, the reports submitted, and any new information or technology that is developed with the assistance of this grant is in the public domain and may not be copyrighted or patented by Grantee. 7.07 Equal Employment Opportunity; Affirmative Action. The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to nondiscrimination and affn-mative action. In particular, the Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or participant in this project because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, disability, sexual orientation, or age; and further agrees to take action to ensure that applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to all aspects of employment, including rates of pay, selection for training, and other forms of compensation. 7.08 Acknowledgment. The Grantee shall appropriately acknowledge the grant assistance made by the Council in any promotional materials, reports, and publications relating to the grant project. 7.09 Compliance with Law. The Grantee agrees to conduct the grant project in compliance with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws. The Grantee is responsible for obtaining and complying with all local and state permits, licenses, and authorizations necessary for the grant project. 7.10 Council's Grant Manager. The Council's Grant Manager for purposes of administration of this agreement is Joe Mulcahy, or such other person as may be designated in writing by the council's Regional Administrator. However, nothing in this agreement will be deemed to authorize the Grant Manager to execute amendments to this grant agreement on behalf of the Council. 7.11 Personal Property Management. Title to all personal property acquired with grant or matching funds shall remain With the Grantee during the Grant Period. Accordingly, the Grantee shall take reasonable measures to protect and defend its title interest and shall keep the personal property free and clear of any liens, encumbrances, or other claims. The Grantee must maintain property records that include, at a minimum, a description of the property, a serihl or other identification number, the acquisition date and cost, and the location, use, and condition of the property. In the final report required by paragraph 5.02, the Grantee shall include a list of all personal property acquired with grant and matching funds which was not expended in performance of the grant project. At the end of the Grant - Period, the Grantee agrees to transfer title to all personal property acquired in whole or in part with grant funds to the Council, at the Council's option, at no charge. The Council reserves the fight to direct -5- - 2411 - appropriate disposition of all personal property, acquired in whole or in part with grant funds, which has not been expended in performance of the grant project. Dur/ng the Grant Period, the Grantee bears the risk of loss of, damage to, or destruction ofan_y personal property acquired with grant or matching funds. No such loss, damage, or destruction shall relieve the Grantee of its obligations under this agreement. The Grantee agrees to maintain personal property acquired with grant or matching funds in good operating order. If, during the Project Activity Period, any project personal property is not used in performing the project, whether by planned withdrawal, misuse, or casualty loss, the Grantee shall immediately notify the Council's Grant Manager. Unless otherwise approved by the Council's Grant Manager, the Grantee shall remit to the Council a proportional amount of the fair market value of the item(s), if any, determined on the basis oF the proportion of Council grant funds used to acquire the item(s). 7.12 Effect of Project Closeout. The Grantee agrees that project closeout does not invalidate continuing obligations imposed on the Grantee by this agreement. Project eloseout does not alter the Council's authority to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review, and does not alter the Grantee's obligation to return any funds due to the Council as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions. IN WITNESS WltE~OF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the dates set forth below. This agreement is effective upon final execution by, and delivery to, both parties. Date METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Date By Keith Buttleman, Assistant General Manager Environmental Quality Assurance Department File Name: MEP - Large Grants Revision: 3/00 -6- -2412- EXHIBIT A--WORK PROGRAM 5341 Maywood Rd., Mound, MN 55364 phone: 952-472-3190 fax: 952-472-0620 Mound Harboi' Renaissance, Mound Visions Plan The MHR project is a $98 million redevelopment project. The City of Mound investment to date is over $6 million, for' land acquisition and construction of Auditors Road, the new "Main Street" along the waterfront. The greenway project, which is scheduled to begin construction this year will cost 1.3 Million and it's funding is in place and includes grants from the Metropolitan Council, Metro Transit, Hennepin County and federal ISTEA grant. The cost of the Stormwater Management & Water Quality Improvement plan measures are estimated, at over $250,000 for construction of raingardens, ponds and the Auditor's Rd subsurface holding chamber. Grant was requested to implement the Stormwater Management & Water Quality Improvement plan, including: - design & construction of local holding-filtration solutions as part of a larger downtown redevelopment project, to remove non-point source pollutants from storm water runoff in the downtown redevelopment area; this would include: - design & construction of filtration areas close to buildings & parking lots to capture water and pollutants at the - placing swales, designed as raingardens along parking lot edges and drain to these filtration areas; locating small holding ponds where possble, especially on the uphill side of existing wetlands to filter runoff - design & construction of rain-gardens, ponds and, where needed or feasible, sub-surface holding chambers to filter water in each district prior to discharge into area lakes; _ reducing non-permeable surfaces by building more compact, 2-4 story mixed-use buildings; - reducing non-permeable surfaces by building for parking demand rather than typical code, using shared parking strategies; and locating more. parking underground and in parking decks or structures; - enhancing shoreline and existing higher quality wetlands adjacent to lakes; both the Lost Lake and the Langdon lake shore areas have been used for dumping and this project will cleanup those areas; The. Mound HRA has a ¢ti'eliminary development agreement with th.e MHR developers and is currently negotiating the final agreement. The project has been presented to the Planning Commission and the first phase will be submitted for PUD approvals this year. Reconstruction of County Rd 15 has begun. Construction in Lost Lake District will begin in 2005, $80,000 MCES grant award ' developer or City match identified exceeds 100% A-1 -2413- -2414- EXI IT B--PROJECT BUDGET Overall Concept Plan: Task 1: understand and document the existing conditions $ 2,500 -- estimate volume of existing storm water runoff in the-downtown redevelo, pment area - identify and locate existing downtown storm sewer outlets & filtration (if any) - identify where storm water surface runoff is entering lakes or wetlands - document Task 1 information (for grant, AUAR & project permits) Task 2: identify SW/WQ improvement measures in overall concept plan - understand the requirements for project approvals City of ~ound, Minnehaha Creek Water Shed District, Minnesota DNR - estimate volume (~f storm water runoff based on the redevelopment concept plan -- locate stormwatar management/water quality improvement elements in the plan ' rain-gardens & swales (localized non?olnt source pollution filtration) local area filtration ponds (small), downtown area filtration ponds (larger) sub-surface holding and filtration chambers alternatives to reduce impermeable surfaces (permeable paving, etc) - document Task 2 information (for grant, AUAR & project permits) $ 1,000 MHR $ 7,000 $ 2,500 MHR $ 8,380 C~ty Phase 1: Lost Lake District Task 3: design-engineering of SW/WQ components in Phase 1 $12,000 - locate and size primary SM/WQ improvement elements - identify alternatives for additional SM/WQ: subsurface chambers, permeable paving, etc. - prepare a preliminary cost estimate for SM/WQ components and alternatives - review SW/WQ components with developer & City to finalize for final design & construction budget - complete design and engineering documents for bid and award of construction Task 4: construction of SM/WQ components in Phase 1 _ rain-gardens & swales (Iobalized non-point source pollution filtration) -- local area filtration ponds (small) _ alternatives to reduce impermeable surface (raised walkways, permeable paving) $58,500 $ 50,000 MHR $20,000 $25,000 $13,500 $30-60,000 Phase 2: Auditor's Rd District $ 15,000 MHR Task 5: design-engineering of SW/WQ components Phase 2 - locate and size primary SM/WQ improvement elements - identify, alternatives for additional SM/WQ: subsurface chambers, permeable paving, etc. - prepare a preliminary cost estimate for SM/WQ components and alternatives - complete design and engineering documents for bid and award of construction - complete design and~ngineering documents for bid and award of construction ' $ 135,000 MHR Task 6: construction of SM/WQ components in Phase 2 rain-gardens & swales (localized non-point source pollution filtration) $15,000 $35,000 - downtown area filtration pond (larger) - b-surface holding and filtration chamber . , Se4~Sn'.0~00~000 B-1 -2415- Metropolitan Council GRANT MEMORANDUM (GM) I (The Grant Manager completes this form to request drafting a grant agreement/amendraent. The Finance Office retains the original and returns a copy to the Grant Manager.) Part 1 A. Grant Agreement/Amendment Initiation 1. This is a new grant. 2. Grantee's full legal name and address: Name: Address: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone Number: o 5 6. 7. City of Mound Attn: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director 5341 Maywood Rd Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 extension Grant/Amendment Purpose/Description: To design and construct stormwater managment features for the Mound Harbor Renaissance redevelopment project. Does this Grant fall under a program report made to the Council? Yes Date of last program report to the Council or date of Council approval of this grant 10/22/2003 Has outside funding to pay the grant been received? No 9. Certification PeopleSoft ChartField values: Account Fund Org Program 5821 614 80919 000 Grant/amendment amount: $80,000.00 End Date: 12/31/2007 Sub-Class 000 Project ] 31A I certify that this Grant/amendment meets award criteria adopted by the Council for this program. Funds are available or arrangements have been made with Finance for funds to be received in the future. inano seO _ : / iff .~t ~l~.n~ff~-~/~/~Date/,, 'vt,~_/LX_~-/-------- /,/Z~7/~-- 1. Criteria ///')/~}uthori~ig~oer ~ff/~D~ 2. Funds Reviewed by: / / ~/~ :.///_ .L~ ¢ 3. Authorization Cc~troller Limson t/ I~ate / Part 1 B. Route to General Counsel's Office to Prepare Agreement/Amendment. Note which of the following items are attached and provide a copy of the approved grant program contract requirements. Information that has gone to Council speci,fic to grant Copy of similar grant.or proposed grant Description of grant project Grant project budget External funding source contract or contract requirements Amendment: Grantee request for amendment Amendment: Grant agreement and any previous amendments '.. -2416- Part 1 C. Grant Manager Approval: Graft ~anager/Date ~ PART 2 (Agreement/Amendment Signing) I have reviewed this agreement/amendment and certify that it is ready Finance sends agreements to Grantee for execution Finance receives executed agreements from Grantee Finance forwards to General Counsel's Office General Counsel's Office forwards to Authorized Signer Authorized Signer returns to Finance Finance encumbers grant ($ ) Finance sends executed copy to Grant Manager Initial and date when completed: - 2417- Engineering · Planning ' Surveying August 4, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2004 Street Reconstruction Project Partial Payment MFRA #14615 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Valley Paving's Payment Request No. 3 for work completed through July 31, 2004 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $168,686.32. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC: tim cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Carlton Moore, Public Works Director Enclosure sAmainAmou 14615Xcorrespondence\Valley Paving Req 3 -2418- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mail.: mfra@mfra,com ~ ' 0 O~ z 0 ~ ~8 ~ ZZ;~ 9 - 2419- -.o o~ 'Il ~nlO oo o m Z -2420- - 2421 - Engineering · Planning ° Surveying August 3, 2004 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound Lost Lake Greenway S.P. 145-090-01 TEAX 2700 (28) Partial Payment MFRA #13566 Dear Kandis: Enclosed is Environmental Associates Payment Request No. 8 for work completed through July 31, 2004 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $38,725.80. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth cc: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Enclosure s:~main:~nou 13566~correspondence\part-pay8.2 -2422- 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mail: mfra@mfra, com -2423- ~' 8888888888888888 8888888 ~ ~88~ o ~ ~ o~ .... .. ~88~ ~°°° ~o~ ~o ~oooo 868~~ ~ '~°~ ~ o °080 oo~o~ -2424- 888 ~ §~ooo§oo~~§~§§ -2425- 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 88888 88 -2426- 0 ~ mm ~ ~ o o o o ~0 o ~ 8 8 $ ~88 $ 88 zmz ZZ~ mc:~ m m -2427- -2428- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 5, 2004 SUBJECT: AUAR Order for Review Resolution SUMMARY Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 4410.3610, subp. 3, the City must adopt an order for review for the Alternate Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) that specifies the boundaries of the area to be reviewed and the anticipated nature, location and intensity of residential and commercial development within those boundaries. The attached resolution orders the AUAR. The final AUAR document must be adopted within 120 days of the ordering of the AUAR. BACKGROUND On April 27, 2004, City Council designated Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. (HKGi) as the AUAR consultant, authorizing a contract and scope of services with HKGi. On June 3, 2004, an agency meeting was held to educate and solicit input that would help identify critical project issues. At the June 22, 2004 City Council meeting, Loren Gordon from HKGi, updated the City Council on the progress of the AUAR. Information has also been distributed to the public through the Lakeshore Weekly and Laker newspapers. A formal notice of the Order for Review will also be posted in the Minnesota environmental Quality Board "Monitor" publication. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the attached Mound Visions Alternate Urban Areawide Review. resolution ordering the -2429- RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION ORDERING AN ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) FOR THE MOUND VISIONS REVEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Mound adopted the Mound Visions Plan in 1992 to guide redevelopment efforts in the downtown. As a concept plan, it incorporates the following basic goals: provide marketable commercial space; take full advantage of views and use of downtown lakes; improve pedestrian and vehicular circulation; maintain "downtown" character as opposed to "suburban" character; and make doing business in downtown Mound easy and enjoyable. Since its adoption, the Mound Visions Plan has been revisited and revised to adapt to and/or influence changing conditions in anticipation of redevelopment; and, WHEREAS, the City's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in April of 2000, in a manner consistent with the Minnesota Statutes Section 473.851. The goals and design themes of the Mound Visions Plan are incorporated in the Redevelopment section of the Comprehensive Plan; and, WHEREAS, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is a substitute form of environmental review that replaces an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) or Environmental Impact Statement as provided for in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3600 and is a more appropriate form of environmental review that evaluates cumulative impacts; and, WltEREAS, the City of Mound is the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) assigned the responsibility of conducting the AUAR; and, WHEREAS, Minnesota Rule 4410.3610 (AUAR Process) Subpart 3 requires an "order for review" to define the review area boundaries and the "anticipated nature, location and intensity" of projected future development; and, WHEREAS, the project area includes approximately 23 acres in the downtown core and further described on the project area map attached as Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the AUAR will explore the impacts of two development scenarios. The first scenario will follow the Comprehensive Plan, which guides land use to implement the Mound Visions Plan. The plan envisions a mixture of land uses with retail, office and residential. The plan also includes a transit center, hotel and an improved Farmers Market. The other scenario will evaluate the impacts of the developments being proposed by Mound Harbor Renaissance and BFL2. The proposals are similar in use and character to the Mound Visions Plan. However, differences in location and densities suggest a need to evaluate both scenarios; and, WHEREAS, the anticipated nature, location and intensity of projected future development is consistent with the mixed use development pattern stipulated in the current comprehensive plan with the exception of residential development shown on the Lost Lake District in the Mound Harbor Renaissance plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mound hereby adopts this Order for Review for the Mound AUAR. Adopted by the City Council this l0th day of August, 2004. -2430- Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2431 - -2432- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-.__ APPROVING THE TERMS OF $121,510 INTERNAL LOAN BE iT - RE SO LVED-B¥ TI~EC]TY COU NCIL-OFTHE CITYO-F'MOU ND,~M1N N E5OTA ("CITY") AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Back.qround, - 1.01. The HRA has retained the services of certain private consultants to conduct an Environmental Review which is required in connection with certain development and redevelopment activities within the City. 1.02. The HRA has determined to pay for such costs consisting of up to $121,510 which will be financed on a temporary basis from the loan of City of Mound Water and/or Sewer Enterprise Funds, or other city funds available for such use, to the Mound HRA. Section 2. Terms of Internal Loan. 2.01. The HRA shall repay to the City fund from which the costs are initially paid, the principal amount of $121,510 (or such lesser amount as is actually borrowed)together with interest on the principal amount expended accruing from the date of each initial expenditure at 2% per year. 2.02. Principal and interest ("Payments") shall be paid annually on December 31, 2006 and each December 31st thereafter to and including December 31,2009. Payments shall be applied first to accrued interest, and then to unpaid principal. 2.03. The principal sum and all accrued interest payable under this internal loan are pre-payable in whole or in part at any time by the HRA without premium or penalty. No partial prepayment shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to be made under this internal loan. 2.04. This internal loan is evidence o f a n internal borrowing b y t he H RA. T his internal loan and the interest hereon shall not be deemed to constitute a general obligation of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof, including, without limitation, the HRA. Neither the State of Minnesota, nor any political subdivision thereof shall be obligated to pay the principal of or interest on this internal loan or other costs incident hereto and neither the full faith and credit nor the taxing power of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of the principal of or interest on this internal loan or other costs incident hereto. JBD-244094vl 1 MU220-2 -2433- 2.05. The City or HRA may amend the terms of this internal loan at any time by resolution of the City Council and the HRA including a determination to forgive the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest to the extent permissible under law. Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution is effective upon the date of its approval. Adopted this 10th day of August, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel SJB-203339v! NE136-170 2 - 2434- Engineering · Planning · Surveying MEMORANDUM DATE: July 21, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: John Cameron, City Engineer SUBJECT: City of Mound Lost Lake Greenway project MFRA #13566 This memo outlines a construction issue and recommended solution at the Lost Lake CJreenway project that Staff would like to review with the City Council. The greenway trail will cross a finger of wetland near the Little League ball fields. Project plans included installation of a 4-foot by 6-foot concrete culvert with the asphalt trail laid on top of it. This solution was chosen as a tried and tested technique for situations like this one. It was also the most economical crossing solution that was allowed by the DNR permit. The culvert was installed in the fall of 2003 according to the plan's specifications and under inspection supervision with some difficulty, due to the unstable soils. Upon spring thaw, one end of the culvert has settled almost 10 inches. Geotechnical tests have been conducted at the culvert location to help determine possible solutions. Those tests reveal very deep peat in the area of the culvert, which accounts for its instability. Even though the culvert has remained stable since this spring, we are concerned about the viability of building a trail over the culvert should it move again. The Soils Engineers are concerned that the peat could continue to settle over a period of 5 to 15 years. The options that have been explored include: Option 1 - Helical Piles This option would involve removal of the existing box culvert and placement of piles to a depth of 35 to 40 feet with pile capacity of 5 to 8 tons. Dewatering would be required, because the piles must 15050 23rd Avenue North o Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com -2435- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith 8/10/2004 ERF Grant Agreement - Auditor's Road The City was recently notified that it was awarded an Environmental Response Fund (ERF) grant to conduct environmental testing in the Auditor's Road District following submittal of an application in May 2004. As part of the grant process, the City and Hennepin County are required to execute a grant agreement which requires approval by the City Council and Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. The grant contract was received via email on August 10, 2004 from Hennepin County. Due to time sensitivity, including the City's desire to complete the testin9 activities by the end of the year (if possible) and the estimated 6-8 week turnaround time for County Board approval, Staff respectfully requests that the Council include the agreement as an add-on item at its August 10th meeting. For your review and consideration, a draft resolution has been prepared to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Grant Agreement with Hennepin County. Members of the Council are advised that the insurance provisions as contained in Section 9 of the grant agreement were reviewed by the LMCIT and deemed to be acceptable. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND TO FORMALLY ACCEPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND (ERF) GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,288.OO TO CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING IN THE AUDITOR'S ROAD DISTRICT AND EXECUTING ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND (ERF) GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Mound is undertaking redevelopment efforts in its downtown area and has entered into a preliminary development agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development (MHRD) for the development of the Lost Lake, Auditor's Road, and Lake Langdon Districts; and WHEREAS, to assist with the funding of the downtown redevelopment project, the City of Mound submitted and was awarded an Environmental Response Fund (ERF) grant from Hennepin County in the amount of $12,288.00 to undertaken environmental testing and preparation of a Response Action Plan (RAP) in the Auditors Road Development District; and WHEREAS, as part of the grant process, the City of Mound and Hennepin County Environmental Services are required to execute a grant agreement which required approval by the Mound City Council and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreement has been reviewed by Staff and was recommended for approval; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota to hereby accept the ERF grant award in the amount of $12,288 and does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Environmental Response Fund (ERF) Grant Agreement with Hennepin County. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council on August 10, 2004. and seconded by Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter · II , Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: To: Sent: Subject: "Gino Businaro" <GinoBus naro@cityofmound.com> "Sarah Smith" <SarahSm th@cityofmound.com> Monday, August 09, 2004 4:27 PM Fw: Hennepin Cry Dept of Environmental Services Sarah: Info from our insurmace agent on Henn Co Grant. Thank you. Gino ..... Original Message ..... From: <Pat Me~ajg.co_m> To: <GinoBusinaro_@¢ityoI]~o und,c~n> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:10 PM Subject: Hennepin Cty Dept of Environmental Services '~>> Gino: Wanted to confirm that the LMCIT's policy meets the limits outlined and > requested by He~mepin County. Just a reminder, that any contractor the > City hires to work under this agreement/contract, will have to meet or > exceed the limits outlined by the County, and that you will have to make > sure that the City has a renewal certificate on file from the contractor > for two (2) years after the completion of the job/project, to comply with > the agreement. > > Should you have a question or a concern regarding a certificate received > from a contractor with respects to the project, please fax a COl? over and > we will review the insurance intbrmation for you. > Thank you. > Pat Meger > > Account Manager > A J Gallagher of MN, Inc. > 7825 Washington Ave So., #300 > Minneapolis MN 55439-2433 > (952)918-3980-Direct Line > (952)944-9795-Fax 8/10/2004 Contract No. 040786 ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND HENNEP1N COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES This Agreement is made on by and between the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ("County" or "Grantor" at A2300 Government Center, Mpls, MN 55487) by and through its Department of Environmental Services ("Department") and the City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 ("Grantee"). Grantee has made application to the County for a grant to be used for assesslnent of a potentially contaminated site at the Auditor's Road District of Mound, which application is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, the parties agree as folIows: 1. GRANT AMOUNT AND COMPLETION The County shall grant to the Grantee a sum not to exceed twelve thousand two hundred and eighty-eight dollars ($ 12,288.00) which funds shall be only for expenses incurred in performing activities specified in the Application and as may be further described in Exhibit A to this Agreement or as approved by County staff. Approved environmental assessment and risk screening activities as may be described in the application and Exhibit A are referred to herein as the "Project". Administrative costs incurred by the Grantee are not eligible for reimbursement via this Agreement. Grantee agrees to complete the Project within one (1) year of execution of this Agreement and within the terms stated herein. Any material change in the scope of the Project, including time schedule and budget, must be approved in writing by the County. Funds made available pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for expenses incurred in performing such purposes and activities described in the Application and this Agreement. 2. ACCOUNTING AND RECORD KEEPING ~ For all expenditures of funds made pursuant to this Agreement, the Grantee shall keep financial records including properly executed contracts, invoices, and other documents sufficient to evidence in proper detail the nature and propriety of the expenditures. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Grantee agrees that the County, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, elc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the Grantee and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of the Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 3. PAYMENT/DISBURSMENT SCHEDULE Grantor will disburse funds to Grantee pursuant to this Agreement, based on a payment request form provided by the Grantor, submitted by the Grantee and approved by the Grantor..Payment requests can be submitted once per month and must be accompanied by supporting invoices that relate to activities in the approved Project budget. Subject to verification of adequacy of a written disbursement request and approval of consistency with this Agreement, the Grantor will disburse the requested amount to the Grantee within four (4) weeks after receipt of a written disbursement request. , ~&,, Il .... iii I ~1 , , II h, 4. REPORTING Grantee shall submit to the Grantor a report on the distribution of funds and the progress of the Project covered from the date of the grant award through June 30 of each year. The reports must be received by the County no later than July 25 of each year. The report shall identify specific goals listed in the application and quantitatively and qualitatively measure the progress of such goals. Reporting forms will be provided by the Grantor. In addition, the required documentation listed in Exhibit A should be supplied as it becomes available. 5. CONTRACTS Grantee shall include in any contract, provisions that require contractors to comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations regarding employment and workplace safety. In accordance with Hennepin County's policies against discrimination, no person shall be excluded from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service, or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws, rules, or regulations against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination. Public Grantees and any contractors or subcontractors performing services as part of this Agreement shall follow that public Grantee's Affirmative Action policy against discrimination. 6. TERMINATION, CANCELLATION AND ASSIGNMENT This Agreement may be canceled by the County upon sixty (60) days written notice to the Grantee without cause. In the event of such cancellation, Grantee shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for work or services satisfactorily performed up to the effective date of such cancellation. If the County finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made toward commencement or completion of the environmental assessment and risk screening activities specified in the Application and this Agreement, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary and after written notice and reasonable opportunity to cure, the County may refuse to disburse additional funds and/or require the return of all or part of the funds ah'eady disbursed, to the extent such funds were used for purposes other than activities contemplated by this Agreement. This Agreement may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the County. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The Grantee shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the activities herein. Nothing is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners between the parties hereto or as constituting the Grantee as the agent, representative, or employee of the County for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. The Grantee is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services and activities performed under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of the Grantee or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Grantee under this Agreement shall have no contractual relationship with the County, and shall not be considered employees of the County. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Wod<ers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel, arising out of employment or alleged employment including without limitation, claims of discrimination against the Grantee, its office,'s, agents, contractor-s, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the County. The Grantee shall defend, indemnif3 and hold ha,'mtess the County, its officials, officers, agents, and employees from any and all such claims irrespective of' any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind whatsoever fi'om the County, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick leave, Workers' Compensation. Re-employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the County, its officials, officers, agents and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the Grantee, its contractors or subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or any party that directly or indirectly benefits from the activities specified in this Agreement, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the activities specified in this Agreement and against ali loss by reason of the failure of theGrantee to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement to the contrary, Grantee reserves (and does not hereby waive) any ctel'enses and/or immunities which are available to it under applicable statutes or regulations, or at common law. 9. INSURANCE In order to protect the County and those listed above under the indemnification provision, the Grantee agrees at all times during the term of this Agreement and beyond such term when so requircd~ to have and keep in force, the following insurance coverages under either a purchased insurance or under the smtulory coverage limits provided through a self-insurance program: Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability Coverage: Limits General Aggregate Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage $l,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Automobile Liability - Combined single limit each occurrence ft~r bodily injury and property damage covering owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles. 1,000,000 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: a. Workers' Compensation If the contractor is based outside the State of Minnc%~>ta. coverage must apply to Minnesota laws. Statutory Employer's Liability. Bodily Injury by: Accident - Each accident Disease - Policy Limit Disease - Each Employee 100,000 500,000 100,000 4. Professional Liability - Per Claim and Aggregate 1,000,000 The insurance must be maintained continuously roi' a period t)i' two years after the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the requirements of this Section 9, the Grantee shall require that any independent contractors rendering assessment and/or clean-up activities under this Agreement furnish ccrtificates of insurance to the Grantee of the insurance coverages listed above, and provide updated certificates as coverages expire. The Grantee shall not commence work until it and any contractors have obtained tile required proof of insurance which clearly evidences required insurance coverages. If the Grantee fails to furnish proof of insurance coverages fi'om the independem crmtractors, if requested by the County, the County may withhold payments and/or pursue any other rights or remedy allowed under the contract, law, equity, and/or statute. 10. MERGER AND MODIFICATION It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supercedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. 11. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and pcrI'ommnce under it. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation hereunder will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving thc parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of th is Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. The Remainder Of This Page Was Intentionally Left Blank COUNTY BOARD APPROVAL The City of Mound, having signed this agreement, and the Hennepin County Board of Comlnissioners having duly approved this agreement on the day of , , and pursuant to such approval, the proper County officials having signed this agreement, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein scl Ibrth. ATTEST: By: By: Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of' its County Board Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: And: Assistant/Deputy/Count5 Administrator By:. Date: Assistant County Attorney Date: And: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: By: Assistant County Attorney Date: RECOMMENDED F()I~ APPROVAL By: Director. Date: _Department CITY OF MOUND By: Its: And: Its: City organized under: Statutory Option A Option B__ Charter This Page Was Intentionally Left Bla~k Exhibit A City of Mound Project Summa .fy: The City of Mound requests ERF funds for assessing and developing a Response Action Plan (RAP) for the Auditor's Road District. A portion of the Auditor's Road district was previously occupied by petroleum dispensers and underground storage tanks. An ERF grant of $12~288.00 is awarded to the City of Mound for a Phase II assessment of the Auditor's Road District, and the development ora RAP. The following costs are based on a budget submitted by the Grantee. Modifications must be approved in writing by the Grantor. Approved Budget for Auditor's Road District: Phase II assessment and RAP development $ 12,288 Total: $ 12,288 Required Documentation to be Submitted to Hennepin County: Consultant/Contractor/MPCA Invoices Phase II Report Response Action Plan MPCA Response Action Plan Approval Letter Annual Project Progress/Summary Report(s) E-1 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members July 21, 2004 Page 2 have tops of reinforced concrete installed below the OHW of Lost Lake. Grade beams would need to be installed to support the culvert. Mo~t likely, the exigting culvert could rtot be' alva eabl'e' and a new cutvert-wouldmeed~tobe installed: - - - Cost approximately $36,500 Option 2 - Compaction Grouting In this option, concrete grout would be pun~ped-unde-~' th~ culvert to d-ispiace a~c~-st~ffen th~bufied peat/organic soils and to lift the culvert, possibly near to its original grade. With the compaction method, dewatering would not be required and the culvert would not have to be removed. A big disadvantage of the compaction grouting is that it is not a positive system, as there is still risk of settlement over time due to the underlying poor soils. Settlement of the culvert could still occur, requiring additional compaction grouting in the future. Cost approximately $15,000 to $20,000 Option 3 - Pedestrian Bridge The third and preferred option would be a pedestrian bridge. The top of the box culvert would need to be removed and two piling driven on each side for the concrete abutments. A pre-manufactured bridge with wood decking would be set in place to span the wetland/drainage swale. The trail would be paved up to both ends of the bridge. Cost approximately $45,600 Based on our analysis, we believe the pedestrian bridge solution will provide the City with the longest life product and the greatest utility for its cost. Therefore, Staff requests authorization to prepare a construction change order to remove the top of the culvert and install a pedestrian bridge in its place. s:~main:Xmou 13566\corres~mayor&counci17 -21 -2436- Page 1 of 1 Kandis Hanson From: "Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us> To: <jamesku rtz@cityofmound.com>; <JimFackler@cityofmou nd.com>; <KandisHanson@cityofmound.com>; <sarahsmith@cityofmound.com>; <signshop@cityofmound.com>; <djniccum22@juno.com>; <jdean@kennedy-graven.com>; <johnmckinley814@yahoo:com> Cc: <geneallendesign@aol,com>; <annetodd@bitstream,net> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 2:14 PM Subject: skate park update Hi all, The skate park has been open for one week. So far, I think things are going very well. There are a few issues that we need to address, such as: bathrooms, blood issues, more garbage cans, additional signs for poison ivy, storage of brooms and squeegees, general Mound park rules like noise, smoking etc. and ways to close the park if needed. We will be looking at these issues as a skate park task force and City park department and bring back some recommendations and information. **If you have any additional issues you think we need to address, please email me as soon as possible.** ** Also let me know of your preference to any of the following Saturday dates for a grand opening celebration.** August 28 Sept. 11 Sept. 25 (school starts on Sept. 1 st) I think the water fountain and mister will be installed as the next step. - Next week I hope! Leah Leah Weycker Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative 5901 Sunnyfield Rd.E Minnetrista, MN 55364 952.491.8058 fax 952.491.8043 www.westonka.org - - 2437- 8/2/2004 Date Weather 7/1/2003 sunny/hot Harbor Wine & Spirits July 04 Cust 04 Cust 03 Variance 296 404 - 108 Sales 04 Sales 03 Difference 6283.58 6848.05 -564.47 7/2/2003. sunny/hot 597 495 102 1 5591.3 9606~69 5984:6'1::: _71_312 0 0~ _4 _s u n ny ......... 756 ..... 94_7.~ii:_~,_19_1' _19059,_19~.;23240,93~ ...... ~ ~_i_4_181~74 7/4/2OO4 0 0 7/5/2004 cool 186 689 -503 2899.88 14382.23 -11482.35 7/6/2004 rain 187 187 3077.7 3077.7 7/7/2004 cloudy 197 346 -149 .~.r~ ~,~ zm,~ ~ ~ ~ ,~,n ,~ 7/8/2004 sun\nice 270 332 -62 4927.68 5034.91 -107.23 7/9/2004 clouds\sun 499 347 152 8989.43 5768.24 3221.19 7/10/2004 sunny 543 353 190 12163.32 5698.33 6464.99 7/11/2004 RAIN 585 -585 10799.62 -10799.62 7/12/2004 sunny/hot 249 752 -503 3585.65 15455.99 -11870.34 7/13/2004 sunny 277 277 4736.84 4736.84 7/14/2004 sunny 268 344 -76 4674.25 5596.07 -921.82 7/15/2004 sunny 275 357 -82 4750.37 5842.85 -1092.48 7/16/2004 sunny 478 392 86 9885.23 6539.57 3345.66 7/17/2004 sunny 583 381 202 13798.7 6767.24 7031.46 7/18/2004 sunny 614 -614 12321.55 -12321.55 7/19/2004 sunny/hot 294 726 -432 5077.2 16315.52 -11238.32 7/20/2004 sunny/hot 264 264 4306.43 4306.43 7/21/2004 sunny/hot 258 341 -83 4579.17 5191.57 -612.4 7/22/2004 sunny/nice 305 337 -32 5887.27 5632.91 254.36 7/23/2004 sunny 399 -399 6069.2 -6069.2 7/24/2004 HAZY 432 -432 7913.42 -7913.42 7/25/2004 HOT/SUN 609 -609 12737.08 -12737.08 7/26/2004 HOT/SUN 773 -773 17014.61 -17014.61 7/27/2004 0 0 7/28/2004 sunny 391 -391 5539.53 -5539.53 7/29/2004 sunny 375 -375 5848.37 -5848.37 7/30/2004 sunny 384 -384 6081.21 -6081.21 7/31/2004 sun/rain 402 -402 7224.55 -7224.55 Totals 6782 12507 -5725 137822.43 234118.78 -96296.35 -2438- DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT EwMiEXOTICS TASK FORCE MINUTES .: 8:3Oa:m,, Friday; June 11,2004 ....... EM ODOffice¥18338MtkaBIvd yDeeph~v~r~ ;I~IN .................................. Present: Herb Suerth, LMCD Board; Pete NelSOn; LMCD Board; Neil Vanderbosch, MN DNR; Ray Newman, U of M Fisheries; Dick Osgood, Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA); Ad Allen, Sun Sailor; Grog N.vbeck. L.MCD Executive Director. Minutes. The Task Force revieWed the rninuteS from the 419/04 EWM/EXOtics Task Force Meeting and accepted them Update of 2004 EWM Harvestin.cl Season on Lake Minnetonka. Suerth asked for an update on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that the harvesting equipment was launched on 619104, with training in the.office on 6/9/04 and training in the field on 6/10/04. Harvesting was Planned to begin on 6/11/04; however, the day has been cancelled due to inclement weather. HarveSting will begin on 6/14104 in the Carmans Bay/Old Channel Bay area. Harvesting plans will continue utilizing the'tower 'Lake South option by moving to Lafayette Bay and then continuing towards the City of ExCelsiorarea. A copy of the 2004 season Summary and approved budget were included in the paoket and he believed 'that they. wef~ generally se f-explanatoryl One issue that'cOntinues to be worked on is making the used high-Speed ~transport barge '(~ornpa'tible With the LMCD harvesting equipment. He entertained questions'or comments from the Ta~k FOrce. Osgood asked if there was any indication of milfoil groWth at this time. Nybeck stated that the lake was recently scouted for the areas Planned to be harvested :based on the Lower Lake South option. Based on;this, .there appears to be milfoil in these areas that is approaching the surface. However, it generallY had not matted at'this time. He believed that the high amounts of precipitation in recent days had contributed to the milfoil not matting at this time; Based on future s~uting of'the Lower Lake South Option, the crew might consider altedng the schedule if milfoil growth in the scheduled areas do not merit harvesting. Nelson asked where the harvested milfoil would be composted at. Nybeck stated that the majodty of the harvested milfoil would be composted at the Arboretum and Gales Wood, which is managed by the Three Rivers Park District He pointed out that "Save the Lake" was going to fund the sampling program for phosphorous removal bY the harvesting program, working with the Three Rivers Park District. Suerth stated that this samPling program was.going to assist in making a ~determination.on whether there was greater value to the harvesting program beyond navigational purposes, dting improving water quality on a long- term basis as an example, This sampling program Was essential in making a decision on whether to proceed with a request to have the MCWD fund the harvesting program in the future. -2439- E,WMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE, 6/11/04, PAGE 2 The Task ForCe bdefly discussed the concept o'f the MCWD possible funding the EWM Harvesting Program and other invasive species on Lake Minnetonka. Suerth stated that he would like to have the compatibility issues of the high-speed transport barge resolved so that it can be further analyzed whether the barge improves the efficiencyof the program: Newman stated that although it was unlikely that the weevil research program would not take place in Smiths Bay, he requested that the LMCD not harvest in this area in 2004 to allow him to monitor whether there was any biological control by the weevils. Update of proposed LMCD containment plan for Lake Minnetonka to prevent ii~t~oduction of zebr;, mussels and other exotic species. Suerth complimented the efforts made by Nelson on this project, including.the preparation of a power point ' ;~,.~, presentation and the coordinating of a zebra mussel video with the Freshwater SOciety. He asked for.an up ate,' d ~, from Nelson. . . Nelson made the following comments: · A number of projects are on-going that have been worked on somewhat simultaneously. · To date, a large effort has been made to get the word out. A letter has recently been sent to the 14 mayors to have each city do some specific things, including establishing a point of contact and distributing a flyer, A poWer point presentation has been fina zed and it has been presented toa number of city councils alreadYI With Other city C°unCitS antciPated n the near fUture He stated that he was awaiting comments back from Jay Rendall to finaliZe the power point presentation, · The LMCD is Currently working on a j°intproject with the FreshWater SocietYon theproductiOn of a zebra mussel ~ideo s~ecifi~allY for ~a~e Mi~net~nka' Both organizat °ns are p ck ng up 50 perCent of theoosts f°r ~e vide° arid the script for the vide° was essentially done. Shooting of the video should be finalized by the"~nd ~i June an~' th e'~hOoting of the vide° is sChedUled for the TPT studio also in late June. This video should been another mechanism to get the word out. · A flyer has been prepared that summarizes the concerns of introducing zebra mussel into Lake Minnetonka. · Funding has been allocated for an increased inspection program on Lake Minnetonka in 2004. · He.envisiOned working, with the LMA and the Minnesota Lakes AssoCiation (MLA)on getting lakes that are infeSted w th, zebra mussels or other invasive species signed as a "black lake" so that the public understands that they are entedng infested waters, · He entertained questions or comments from the Task Force. Suerth stated that he believ~ that Senator Gert Olson provided the LMCD an opportunity to work With her on potential legislative changes and/or funding sources through the state legislature. Nelson stated that he was hopeful that SenatoroIson would be able to assist on this project because of her influence at the State Senate Environmental Committee. The TaskForce briefly discussed the recent legislative change to the LMCD's state enabling legislation and the potential environmental impacts it could have to Lake .Minnetonka: -2440- . E..WMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE, 6/11104, PAGE 3 Suerth stated that he supported 100 percent the educational efforts that taking place regarding the problems associated with the introduction of zebra mussels into Lake Minnetonka. However, he believed the first and last line of defense is increased inspections and there is a need figure out how to fund these increased inspections in the future. ,~ Nelson stated that one hurdle to addreSS with raising funds for increased ins_P~iO__n_is~_nv]ncin_g mepUbliC to fund-arractivitythat-do~ot h~-Vb-a [~-ri.~ibl~-butc6me, He believed that the State of MinnesOta needs to make deciSion on whether theY'will:take sPecial efforts to keep zebra mussels out of Lake Minnetonka because it is a gateway lake for Minnesota. If they are willing to take special efforts, there is a need to get a commitment from the State of Minnesota on how much funds they am. willing tn nnrnrnif I:~:,fnr~ fhi~ n,,,',ei'l,.-,n r,~n ~ a~ LMCD wou d need to better define how many f~nds they W;;l~]il~;'i; s~;~;~o;;'i~c;;,;;;~'ins];~ctions and othe''w''''''''''' "~" projects. Osgood stated that when milfoil was originally discovered in Lake Minnetonka, there~was an]nte.rest of lhe.l.,~ at thaHime,to-timit public-access, 'One dis[inctiOi~ bet~en ~he c~ern for milf(~il at that time, and the current ' '~'~' concem for the introduction of zebra mussels into Lake Minnetonka, was that milfoil had already infested Lak~ ?~''''' Minnetonka when the discussions were occurring. Zebra mussels are not in Lake Minnetonka and the LMA w~uld like to take efforts to prevent the introduction of them. , Suerth asked Newman on any impacts that a zebra mussel that a zebra mussel introduction into Lake Minnetonka could have on the fisheries. Newman stated that some research has been done on this question; however, it is difficult to draw any firm impacts that a zebra mussel introduction could have. on fisheries. Vanderbosch stated that the transfer of zebra mussels from infested waters to non-infested waters is high on the pdority list of the MN DNR. Osgood stated that there is a laundry list of things that cOUld haPPen if zebra mussels are introduced into Lake Minnetonka. He believed that the big message to consider would be the impacts to Lake Minnetonka if one or. more of these happen. Nelson stated that he believed the right approach in presentations to take to city councils or other interested parties was to state !hat every lake is different, it is unclear what would happen to Lake Minn~tonkajf~.~z~bra mussels are introduced into Lake'Minnetonka, and the need to protect Lake Minnetonka froma scientific experiment to find out what would happen to if zebra mussels are introduced. Osgood stated that the LMA .was disappointed and concerned that the response of the MN DNR for Lake Ossawinnamakee in 2004 was not enough. Three to four hours of inspections a day are scheduled at the public accesses on Lake Ossawinnamakee and the LMA does not believe this was an adequate response by the MN DNR. The technical controls planned in 2004, primarily copper sulfate, are well known and not perfect. Although the LMA believes that more technical controls should take place in 2004, the LMA believes that the greater focus should be focused on inspections and boats leaving the lake. He stated that he was on the Board of the Minnesota Lakes Association and he would be recommending that they take a similar position of the LMA. Nelson stated that he would work with Suerth and Nybeck to prepare a list that would further refine possible costs of future projects associated with a more comprehensive zebra mussel program, It might make more sense at this time to focus time on raising funds for future projects. · -2441 - ?. ..,E;WM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE, 6/11104, PAGE 4 ~.. F'"" A~enc¥ Reports. Newman stated that the funding for biological control of milfoil was generally depleted. However, he has a student from Blake this summer that will be conducting weevil surveys around the lake at a variety of sites. v anderb°sch Stated that-he-formallY~t°°k over-the-POsition PrevioUSly held by Dave McCormack in the Aquatic Plant Management division on 5/19/04. His replacement Was Doyle Haas and them are another changes going on within Aquatic Plant Management: ~t Gc~ wlu~ mc~r,~ d~.~.;l~tlOri reports. There were no area wide lake association report. Old business. There was no old business. New business. There was no new bUSiness. Next EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting Suerth stated that the next EWM/Exotics Task ForCe Meeting was scheduled for Fdday, 8/13/04. Adjournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. Respectfully Submitted, Grog Nybeck Executive Director -2442- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, July 14, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Skramstad called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Miles Canning, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Debbie Halvorson, Orono; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Herb Suerth, Woodland. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician. Members absent: Tom Scanlon, Spring Park; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad There were no Chair announcements. READING OF MINUTES- 6/9/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 6/23/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Knudsen moved, Nelson seconded to approve the minutes from the 6/9/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (9), Abstained (1, Canning); motion carried. Skramstad stated that in the minutes for the 6/23/04 Regular Board Meeting, he did not believe the discussion was accurately reflected under agenda item 6A on page 8. Specifically, he recalled that he made a friendly amendment to the motion to restrict the purchase of public safety equipment for the Sheriff's Water Patrol to $2,000 so that it was consistent with the 2004 "Save the Lake" Budget. This friendly amendment was not accepted; however, Babcock and Scanlon accepted a friendly amendment to restrict spending up to $2,200. He did not believe this was reflected in the draft minutes and he believed that it should be added to them. MOTION: Halvorson moved, Suerth seconded to approve the minutes from the 6/23/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting as amended, subject to staff adding the discussion recommended by Skramstad to them. VOTE: Ayes (6), Abstained (4; Burma, Foster, Suerth, and Van Hercke); motion carried. -2443- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda. Mr. Randy Boyd, 19960 Minnetonka Blvd., commented on the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub- Committee Report He recommended that the 1974 policy should remain because eliminating it would create loopholes for municipalities to expand boat storage in critical bays such as Carsons-and St. Louis Bays. The City of Deephaven has had an application submitted with the LMCD for close to 18 months and he believed that the application was flawed because he did not believe that Deephaven had adequately documented the 929.4' shoreline that they claim they have. He stated that the boats anchored at Big Island in past boat density surveys have not been documented as active boats because they do not have a wake when the counts are being made. He believed that these boats should be included in the survey as active boats. Skramstad stated that an update of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density was scheduled later in the meeting, including a written Report. However, he did not believe that extensive discussion of this Report would take place at this meeting. He recommended that a more detailed discussion of this Report would take place at an upcoming Board Planning/Workshop Session after Foster and other members of the sub-committee had an opportunity to provide background on the Report. Babcock and Ambrose arrived at 7:10 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING · Pelican Point HOA, new multiple dock license application to reconfigure the conforming multiple dock facility on Spring Park Bay, Skramstad opened the public hearing at 7:11 p.m. and asked for background from Harper. Harper made the following comments: · Mr. Owen Gregg, representing the applicant, has submitted a new multiple dock license application for Board consideration. The facility is currently approved for 40 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on 2,850' of non-continuous shoreline. Two docks are currently approved for this facility, with 24 BSU's on the north end and 16 BSU's on the south end. Shoreline from a nearby island in the original application was allowed to be transferred to the mainland site for density purposes utilizing Code Section 2.02, subd. 5. · The applicant has proposed four changes. First, the applicant has proposed to add a 6' x 8' dock section for a handicapped access platform on the north dock. Second, the applicant has proposed to add a 3.5' x 16' dock on the peninsula for canoe launching. Third, the applicant has proposed to add a 3.5' x 16' dock section off of the south dock for a bench. Fourth, the applicant has proposed to straighten the main walkway on the south dock, which would result in the length of one BSU increasing from 24' to 32'. · A second application has been submitted for consideration by the Board. in 2003, there was a change in their management company and a lack of communication with the LMCD. Thus, a multiple dock license was not approved for this facility in 2003. To resolve this, Pelican Point HOA has submitted a renewal, without change, multiple dock license application for 2003. · Code Section 2.03, subd 7 requires a new multiple dock license application when there is any change in slip size, ownership, width, height or location of a structure under this section. ~.-2444- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 3 Because the application, if approved, would add dock structure and increase a slip size, a new multiple dock license application with public hearing is required. · Code Section 2.01, subd. 1 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use area for docking and storage of watercraft. If the proposed application were approved, both the dock structure and storage of watercraft would be within the authorized dock use area for this site. Based on Environmental Quality Board rules, a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)_would~otmeed_tQ1)e~onducted for the_new multiple~oc, kJicense_application because one was conducted by the City of Mound in 1994. A second mandatory EAW does not need to be conducted until there has been a cumulative expansion of 20,000 square feet for dock structure and maneuvering space since the mandatory EAW was prepared in 1994. · In accordance with MN DNR General Permit 97-6098, the City of Mound and the MN DNR were provided a copy of the new multiple dock license application on 6~30~04, with comments due by 7/12/04. The City of Mound has communicated that they have no objections to the application and no comments have been received from the MN DNR. · He recommended Board approval of the Pelican Point HOA renewal, without change, 2003 multiple dock license application and the 2004 Pelican Point HOA new multiple dock license application. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Halvorson questioned whether some of the 16 BSU's on the south end of the site had been installed in the past. Mr. Owen Gregg, 2938 Pelican Point Circle, stated that he was President of the homeowners association and Chair of the docking committee. He believed that Harper pretty well summarized the application that was proposed and the communication problems that existed in 2003. Of the 16 BSU's approved on the south end of the site, only 12 have been installed in 2004 because four homes do not have a boat. Babcock stated that there was a need to ensure that there was no overnight storage proposed at the canoe launching dock. Skramstad questioned whether there would be potential water depth concerns with the proposed dock moving slightly closer in to shore. Gregg stated that he believed there are a few locations where the docks would be located within areas that are slightly shallow and have vegetation. However, he believed that there would be adequate water depths for navigational purposes. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed at 7:19 p.m. MOTION: Valdesuso moved, Foster seconded to approve the 2003 Pelican Point HOA renewal, without change, multiple dock license application and the 2004 Pelican Point H©A new multiple dock license application. ~. -2445- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page4 Babcock proposed two friendly amendments. First, no overnight storage should be allowed at the canoe launching dock. Second, he recommended that any previous license conditions for this facility should be carried forward on future licenses. Valdseuso and Foster agreed to these friendly amendments. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. 1. WATER STRUCTURES A. Discussion of 7/9/04 staff memo that summarizes expenses incurred to be deducted from the $250 refundable deposits for recently submitted variance applications. Skramstad asked for background on this agenda item from Harper. Harper made the following comments: · The LMCD has recently processed variance applications for Kenneth Peterson and Miles and Pamela Canning. · Variance applications submitted to the LMCD include a $250 non-refundable base fee and a $250 deposit, which is refundable based upon full compliance with and the extent of administrative, inspection, and legal services required. Both fees were submitted in the Peterson variance application; however, only the $250 refundable deposit was submitted in the Canning variance application based on action taken by the Board at the 11/12/03 Regular Meeting. · At the 3/10/04 Regular Meeting, the Board directed the LMCD attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Canning variance application. On 3/12/04, staff received a facsimile from the Cannings withdrawing their variance application. At the 3/24/04 Regular Meeting, the Board directed the LMCD attorney to continue preparation of the Findings of Fact and Order, although the Board took no formal action on them because the variance application had been withdrawn. · Legal expenses incurred by the LMCD in the processing of these variance applications were $103.20 for Kenneth Peterson and $451.50 for Miles and Pamela Canning. Traditionally, the Board has deducted these legal expenses from the $250 deposit. · He recommended that the Board: 1) refund Kenneth Peterson $146.80 of the $250 deposit, and 2)issue no refund of the $250 deposit submitted by Miles and Pamela Canning and the Board should discuss whether to invoice the Cannings $201.50 for expenses incurred in excess of the $250 deposit. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Skramstad recommended that the Board separate the two variance deposit recommendations made by Harper. He asked the Board if they had questions on the recommendation made by Harper on the Kenneth Peterson variance application refund or he entertained a motion to approve it. MOTION: Babcock moved, Nelson seconded to approve a refund of $146.80 of the $250 deposit for the approved variance application. -2446- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 5 VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. Skramstad asked for comments or questions on the recommendation made by Harper to not refund any of the $250 deposit to Miles and Pamela Canning and for the Board to discuss whether to invoice the Cannings for the additional $201.50 for legal expenses incurred in excess of the $250 deposit. Canning stated that he would like to comment on the recommendation made by Harper on this agenda item as an applicant rather than a Board member. He stepped down from the Board during the remainder of this agenda item and made the following comments: He and his wife withdrew their variance application when it became apparent that it was going to be denied by the Board. The withdrawal of the variance application was made in writing and it requested that LeFevere not prepare the Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the application. · At the subsequent Board meeting, the Board approved a motion that required LeFevere to continue preparation of the Findings of Fact and Order, although there was no variance application at that time. He expressed his concern that these Findings of Fact and Order were still prepared and that there was discussion on whether to bill these legal expenses back to he and his wife. · He believed that there was no purpose or benefit to he and his wife to have these Findings of Fact and Order prepared. Instead, these Findings of Fact and Order are to the benefit of the LMCD. · He expressed his concern about the language in the Findings of Fact and Order and that he was not satisfied with the outcome of the variance application process. He requested that the entire $250 deposit should be refunded to he and his wife and the additional legal expenses incurred are the responsibility of the LMCD. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Foster stated that he was confused on the discussion on whether to bill the legal expenses back to the Cannings because all of the legal expenses incurred by the LMCD were after the variance application was withdrawn. Babcock stated that he believed the legal expenses incurred on this project were incurred before the fact, rather than after the fact, because there was an original motion that directed LeFevere to prepare Findings of Fact and Order for denial of the Canning variance application prior to the application being withdrawn. There were a number of comments made by the Board on whether to refund the $250 deposit submitted with the Canning variance application. Some of them included: · Van Hercke and Skramstad expressed an interest in not taking action at this meeting to allow staff to provide the minutes that summarized Board discussion. · Foster stated that he believed staff had already provided a detailed discussion of these meetingS and that there was not a need to table action on this refund past this Board meeting. _ 244-.7.- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 6 · Sue[th stated that he recalled the Findings of Fact and Order was a document that summarized the work and discussion that took place during the Canning variance application. He believed that the Board had put the time in to process the Canning variance application and that the $45J .50 of legal expenses incurred by the LMCD were the responsibility of the Cannings. · Babcock stated that the Board had already made one concession to the Cannings by allowing the three-year old variance application to be pulled out of the file, including not requiring a $250 non-refundable base fee. He expressed concern about making a second concession because LeFevere was directed to prepare the Findings of Fact and Order prior to the Cannings withdrawing their application. · Halvorson stated that she would like to better understand any precedent of the LMCD to bill back legal expensed incurred up and above the $250 refundable deposit. Nybeck stated that the Board had recently billed back legal expensed incurred up and above the $250 refundable deposit for Bayview Event Center, Maple Hills Association, and Thomas Tallakson variance applications. The Board continued its comments: · Burma stated that he did not believe the legal expenses should be billed back to the applicants because no expenses had been incurred prior to the application being withdrawn. · Valdesuso stated that he did not believe the legal expenses should be billed back to the Cannings. · Nelson stated that he would be inclined to bill the legal expenses incurred by the LMCD on the Canning variance application. · Babcock stated that he believed the applicants were made aware up front that legal fees could be billed back to them and that the primary purpose to withdraw the variance application was to avoid this. He expressed concern that a Board member or a member of the public should not be able to undo a previous action by the Board. MOTION: Foster moved, Burma seconded to refund the entire $250 deposit submitted with the Miles and Pamela Canning variance application. Canning stated that the primary reason why he and his wife withdrew their variance application was to regroup and minimize documentation that could make it more difficult to re-submit a variance application in the future. Skramstad proposed a friendly amendment that would clarify the motion that the Cannings would not be billed for the additional $201.50 legal expenses incurred up and above the $250 deposit. Foster and Burma agreed to this. VOTE: Ayes (6), Nayes (5; Babcock, Knudsen, Nelson, Suerth, and Van Hercke); motion carried. Canning reassumed his position on the Board. -2448- T. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 7 B. Ordinance Amendment, first reading of an ordinance relating to the storage of fire and rescue boats on Lake Uinnetonka; amending LMCD Code Section 2.02, subd. 6. Skramstad asked Nybeck for background on this agenda item. Nybeck stated that he had updated the Board at the 6/23/04 Regular Meeting that there were a number of local fire departments that expressed an interest in storing fire rescue boats on Lake Minnetonka. At this meeting, the Board directed LeFevere to prepare a Code amendment to allow for this to occur at both municipal and commercial docks on Lake Minnetonka. LeFevere has prepared the draft Code amendment and a copy of the staff memo, dated 618104, was included in the packet that was reviewed at the 6123104 Regular Board Meeting. MOTION: Babcock moved, Foster seconded to approve first reading of the ordinance amendment, waive second and third readings, and adopt the ordinance. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 2. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Chair update of Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee. Skramstad asked for an update on this agendaitem from Foster and other sub-committee members. Foster stated that he believed the documents included in the packet were self-explanatory. These documents included a 2004 Boat Density Sub-Committee Final Report and background information. He believed that further discussion of this agenda item was suitable for a Board Planning/Workshop Session because it could take several hours to discuss. He requested that each Board member review the materials and communicate to either himself or Nybeck two or three areas that they would like to discuss further that are of concern. Van Hercke stated that she believed boat density is the foundation of this Board and that this topic requires input from all 'Board members. Babcock stated that he believed the sub-committee concluded that boat density encompasses the majority of the work performed by the LMCD. He encouraged Board members to participate in the review of these documents in the near future similar to what the sub-committee members did. A line in the sand was drawn in when the 1974 policy was adopted and the management Plan was adopted in the early 1990's. He expressed concern that application of the 1974 policy in current day standards would eliminate and negate growth in nearly all bays on Lake Minnetonka, which he did not believe was the sentiment of the sub-committee. He believed that the work of this sub- -2449- ~. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 8 committee has been completed and that the Board might want to appoint a new sub-committee to re-write the existing 1974 policy. Canning stated that he believed there was consensus on the sub-committee that the structure of the 1974 policy was pretty good. He believed that there was a need to get further data and that there was a need to project what the lake would look like in 10 to 15 years. He stated that the work of the sub-committee has been completed and he believed that there was a need to further identify the structural problems with the 1974 policy and make changes to them based on the current thought process. Foster concurred with the comments made by Babcock that boat density entails the majority of the work performed by the LMCD. When the management plan was worked on and eventually adopted in the early 1990's, the LMCD contracted with a consultant who had significant lake management background and experience. He suggested that the Board might want to consider hiring a similar consultant to establish a process, although he believed that the scope of this project would be significantly less that the management plan. Skramstad thanked the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee for the worked that it has performed. He concurred with Foster in that he believed there was a need for each Board member to provide feedback on two or three areas that they would like to discuss further. He recommended that a deadline should be established for this feedback. The Board discussed this and the consensus of the Board was that comments should be sent to either Foster or Nybeck by 7/23104 to allow for a preliminary update at the 7~28~04 Regular Board Meeting. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 3. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (711104 - 7/15/04). Knudsen reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. MOTION: Nelson moved, Suerth seconded to approve the audit of vouchers as submitted. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B. Additional Business. Skramstad stated that he had recently discussed with Knudsen and Nybeck on the need to prepare a middle of the year update on the finances of the LMCD. The June financial summary and balance sheet was scheduled to be reviewed at the 7/28/04 Regular Meeting and he believed that this would take place at this Regular Meeting. -2450- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 9 Knudsen stated that he had recently discussed this recommendation with Nybeck and that this discussion would likely take place at the 7/28/04 Regular Board Meeting. 4. EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE A. Minutes from the 6/11/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. Skramstad asked Suerth for an update on the 6/11/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. Suerth asked Nybeck for an update on the 2004 EWM Harvesting Program. Nybeck stated that the harvesting equipment was launched on 6/9/04, with training in the office on 6~9~04 and training in the field on 6/10/04. Harvesting began on 6/14/04 because of inclement weather on 6/11/04. The Lower Lake South option was implemented in 2004 and all of the Lower Lake has been harvested once. The vast majority of North Upper Lake has been harvested and the crew at this time was in the Cooks Bay area, moving towards Phelps Bay and Enchanted Island. The first round of harvesting should be completed in the next couple of weeks and this should allow for a couple weeks of second harvests prior to pulling the equipment off of Lake Minnetonka in 2004. He communicated encouraging feedback on the use of the high-speed transport barge where transport distances from the harvest area to the off-load site are Iongl Suerth asked Nelson for an update on the zebra mussel program from Nelson. Nelson stated that completion of the zebra mussel video that the LMCD is working jointly with the Freshwater Society should be completed by 7/29/04. Two of the three panelists have been confirmed, with Jay Rendall from the MN DNR declining the offer to be on the panel. He stated that he would like someone to serve on the panel that has first hand experience with zebra mussels, possibly a marina operator on the Mississippi or St. Croix Rivers. The Lake Minnetonka Association (LMA) has prepared a letter that takes on a more aggressive stand than the LMCD. The LMA believes that more needs to be done and that both the MN DNR and the Lake Minnetonka communities need to take the potential problem more seriously. He requested that each Board member make a contact with the member city that they represent on what their city is doing. He stated that he would be working with staff to update the LMCD's website for invasive species, with an emphasis on zebra mussels. Babcock stated that he believed the LMCD could be proactive to piggyback on existing zebra mussel signage at the St. Croix/Mississippi River and Lake Minnewashta. Canning stated that one of the positions that the LMA might be taking would be to close down all public accesses that cannot be adequately inspecting boats prior to entering Lake Uinnetonka. He believed that improved signage as recommended by Babcock was a proper function of the LMCD and that he would support this. B. Discussion of possible future funding of the EWM Harvesting Program by the MCWD. Skramstad stated that a number of Board members had expressed an interest in pursuing the -2451 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 PagelO concept that the MCWD would possibly fund the EWM Harvesting Program in the future. He indicated that he had discussed this recently with Lance Fisher, President of the MCWD Board of Managers. He understood that Nybeck has also had conversations with MCWD District Administrator regarding the same topic. Fisher has stated thatthe MCWD has funded activities in the past that did not run well. Fisher has stated that if the MCWD were to fund and take over the EWM Harvesting Program only on Lake Minnetonka, he believed that this could become a problem because there are 129 lakes within the watershed district. The discussion concluded that he and Fisher would bring this topic up to the respective Boards to investigate whether this should be pursued further. Babcock stated that he believed Lake Minnetonka deserved special attention because Lake Minnetonka is the busiest water body that is fully contained within the State of Minnesota. Van Hercke stated that she had discussed this concept with Minnetonka Mayor Karen Anderson. One concept that they discussed was whether the focus of the program would move away from Lake Minnetonka if the MCWD was to both fund and manage the harvesting program. Nelson stated that there are other bodies of water that are outside of the jurisdiction of the LMCD and near Lake Minnetonka, citing Lake Virginia as an example. He believed that including these bodies of water in programs to prevent the introduction of other invasive species into Lake Minnetonka was essential and the MCWD would likely have jurisdiction on them. Suerth stated that he recalled this discussion originally took place when there was a report provided by the MCWD that stated that harvesting of milfoil could assist in the removal of phosphorous from Lake Minnetonka. With the sampling program that the LMCD is working in conjunction with the Three Rivers Park District during the 2004 EWM Harvesting Program, he believed that the LMCD might be in a better position to approach the MCWD after this program has been concluded. Babcock stated that he would like further clarification from the MCWD on whether public agencies or homeowner associations that were involved in programs that were funded in the past that have not been successful. He pointed out that the LMCD through its enabling legislation could petition the MCWD on the feasibility of funding the LMCD's EWM Harvesting Program. LeFevere stated that the only watershed management organization that he was aware of that had taxing authority, was the Mississippi Watershed Management Organization. This watershed management organization is primarily located in the downtown Minneapolis area, it has a multi million dollar annual budget, and generally only provides funding for projects conducted by other parties. He believed that contractual arrangements and joint power agreements are not uncommon amongst governmental agencies and that this could possibly be applied to an arrangement between the LMCD and the MCWD, with conditions deemed necessary by both agencies. Canning stated that the City of Greenwood was in favor of broadening the revenue soUrces for the harvesting program. However, he believed that there could be some concern about the possibility -2452- ~. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 11 of the MCWD either reducing or eliminating the harvesting program if the MCWD were to both fund and take over the program. Nybeck stated that the funding of the harvesting program on Lake Minnetonka is not fully funded by the 14 member cities because the LMCD annually receives a grant from the MN DNR for this project. He pointed out that the amount of the grant funding provided by the MN DNR fluctuates from year to year. The Board continued to discuss this agenda item and the consensus was to use the data from the 2004 phosphorous sampling program being coordinated with the Three Rivers Park District as a launching point to continue the process with the MCWD on whether they would fund the harvesting program in the future. Mr. David Gross, 19700 Lakeview Avenue, stated that the City of Deephaven recently rejected the 2005 LMCD Budget based strictly on this issue. Additionally, the MCWD has a 10-year plan that specifically states that the MCWD will consider funding for control of milfoil. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business, 5. ADMINISTRATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVE THE LAKE There was no discussion. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck updated the Board on three items. First, the lake level as of 7/14/04 was 929.64', with a discharge of 190 c.f.s. Second, there were two letters to the editor in local newspapers that were included in the packet for informational purposes. Third, there was a letter from the City of Uinnetonka that has requested that the LMCD change its ordinances to require all charter boats to obtain permission from the governmental agency that manages the public agency when they launch and remove their boat from Lake Uinnetonka. This request was made in response to the recent launching of a charter boat by Bayview Event Charters at the new Grays Bay public access that caused some limited damage by the commercial transport company. If the Board were to change the Code as requested by the City of Minnetonka, he believed that this process would be similar to charter boats needing ports of call authorized by the appropriate member cities. The Board discussed the request made by the City of Minnetonka and the consensus was that charter boats should not be launched atthe Grays Bay public access unless they could enter the site within the turning radius at the entrance point. Additionally, the Board stated that they supported charter boats on Lake Uinnetonka and there is a need to ensure that they can be launched and removed from -2453- ~. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 12 Lake Minnetonka. The Board discussed whether this was a land based issue that should be resolved by the City of Minnetonka or whether the LMCD should get involved in this issue. The Board directed Nybeck to contact the owner of Bayview Event Charters and report back to the Board how they are launching their charter boats and what problems they are having. 8. OLD BUSINESS Update on the possibility of relocatJnq LMCD Board Meetin,qs Skramstad asked for an update from Nybeck on the possibility of moving LMCD Regular Board Meetings to the City of Wayzata. Nybeck stated that he had recently sent an e-mail to Dave Fdschmon from the City of Wayzata and Jim Lundberg from the LMCC asking what was the next step to keep this process moving forward. Based on the feedback received, the next steps will be to write a short letter to the City of Wayzata summarizing the proposal, to schedule a meeting with the Wayzata city administrator, and meet with the Wayzata city council sometime in the near future. Skramstad stated that he supported Nybeck further pursuing this project and providing the Board an update in the next couple of months. Update on 2004 Multiple Dock License Inspections Skramstad asked for an update on multiple dock license inspections to be conducted in 2004. Harper stated that 2004 multiple dock license inspections are being conducted; however, he was slightly behind schedule because of other projects that are going on. Skramstad encouraged Board members to coordinate time with staff to participate in multiple dock license inspections conducted within their city. Update on Six Mile Creek Resolution Babcock stated that he believed the Board had directed staffto prepare a draft resolution for discussion at this meeting relating to the recent state legislative change for tributaries leading into Lake Uinnetonka. He asked for an update on this. LeFevere stated that he was collecting background information for this draft resolution and that it should be available for review by the Board at the 7~28~04 Regular Meeting. NEW BUSINESS Update on public safety lanes at Cruiser's Cove Babcock stated that he and his family traversed the new public safety lanes during the fourth of July Holiday. He expressed his concern about the new public safety lane that parallels the shoreline at -2454- :. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 14, 2004 Page 13 Cruiser's Cove because of boats that anchor adjacent to this safety lane and because people swimming across the lane. He stated that creating this horizontal lane of traffic was problematic and that this might need to be re-addressed in the future, with possible solutions including additional vertical lanes at the east-end of the site and possibly limiting the number of boats that can raft together. Update on the possible sale of the Bi,q Island Veterans Camp Skramstad asked for an update on the possible sale of the Big Island Veterans Camp and the implications based on a potential sale. Halvorson stated that she had recently attended an Orono city council meeting and that this was discussed with local legislators and veterans. She believed that this site was zoned for parkland by the City of Orono and would make it problematic for re-development of this site. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:37 p.m. Tom Skramstad, Chair Jose Valdesuso, Secretary -2455- ~. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA 7:00 PM, Wednesday, July 28, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Vice Chair Van Hercke READING OF MINUTES- 7/14/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) PUBLIC HEARING · Crosby Cove LLC/City of Minnetonka, new commercial dock license application to allow for the construction of a nine foot wide bridge for use by the Crosby Cove homeowners to access Outlot A and for public use for the City of Minnetonka trail system. 1. Public Hearing 2. Discussion and/or Consideration 1. WATER STRUCTURES A) Bayview Homeowners Association, 'new multiple dock license submitted on 9/22/76 to back license 10 Boat Storage Units (BSU's) on a 100' wide outlot on Smithtown Bay (Public hearing was conducted at the 6/9/04 Regular Board Meeting); B) Deicing Installations, discussion of Code Section 2.09, including LMCD staff observations, concerns, and trends; C) Additional Business; 2. LAKE USE & RECREATION A) Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Significant Activity Report; B) Additional Business; 3. FINANCIAL A) Audit of vouchers (7/16/04 - 7/31/04); B) June financial summary and balance sheet; C) Additional Business; -2456- 4. ADMINISTRATION A) Discussion of draft resolution pertaining to Six Mile Creek; B) Additional Business; 5. EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE 6, SAVE THE LAKE 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT -2457-. ~. quarterty publication of Hennepin County Summer 2004 · VoLume 4, Number 3 Rehabbed 'Home Tour' houses auctioned Two of the houses fearttred in the 2004 Minneapolis/St. Paul Home Tour were auctioned at Hennepin County's public tax-forfeited-land auction in May. This was the first time county tax-forfeited properties have been part of the Home Tour. ~These beautiful, mint-condition homes aren't the kind of properties you'd expect to see offered at a public auction," said Pat O'Connor, director of Taxpayer Services, which oversees the county's tax-forfeited property program and conducts the auction. abut, in fact, these homes are exactly the kind of properties the county has been offering at auction since 1996," O'Connor said. The two tax-forfeited properties on the Home Tour were a classic 1920s bungalow and a Craftsman- style bungalow. Both homes - located in South Minneapolis - were completely remodeled. 3432 36 Ave. S., M. lm~enpolis Since Hennepin began rehabbing tax-forfeited properties, about 40 homes have been rebuilt and offered at auction. More than half the homes a.re now ownes-occupied and back on the mx roils. pi h ti th Henne n osts mee ngs to ga er ideas for human services budget Affordable housing and services to most-vulnerable vulnerable povulat'ons we ha e,' Haats said. "The residents are among the top concerns raised at issues are Complex.' . seven meetings that the Hennepin Human Services Department conducted to seek input about spending Many of the participants shared personal stories that and services, prompted their attendance at the meetings. "A lot of people talked about kids who are at risk of belng Curt Haats, chief financial oEices for the Human abused or teetering between either ending up in the Services Department, said attendance at the correcuons system or getting on the right track," he meetings varied from 15 people to dose to 50, not said. including Hennepin staff.. ~People really appreciate the services that HSD provides. And, an encouraging "People talked about the effects of legislative cuts on thing is people seem to recognize that it's just not mental health services, and they are worried about the county that has to do the work. They're saying an already overwhelmed system being unprepared 'What can we do as a community to fix thing .'" 'x for new immigrant populations,~ Haats said. "New immigrants have many issues that we have to be People are concerned about big issues, like shelter, prepared to handle. Some of it is from a cultural housing, services to people with mental illness and services to at-risk kids. "These are some of the most continued page 2 -2458- County Board Highlights In recent weeks, the County Board: Actilag as the Housing and Redevelopment Authority, approved recommendations for $2 million in Transit-Oriented Devdopment Program funding for 2004. · Created a Homeless Youth Action Group, charged with improving outcomes for homeless youth and ending youth homelessuess in the county. · Approved an agreement with the U.S. Marshal's Service to allow the county Cormmunity Corrections Department to participate in the Metro Area Fugitive Task Force. · Authorized $2.6 million in state recyding grants to county municipalities. Approved an agreement continuing the partnership with PPL Industries for support services for Hennepin's consumer-electronics, household-batteries and in-house recycling programs. Approved an agreement with Official Payments Corp. m allow for the payment of property taxes by credit/debit card. Accepted a grant from the Minnesota Department of Human Services m fund the county's Street Case Management Program for homeless, chronic inebriates. To find out about these and other County Board actions, go to the Hennepin County Web site - w w w.hennepiu.us. Andrew Baker is new medica[examiner The County Board has named Dr. Andrew M. Baker the new county medical examiner, succeeding Garry F. Pererson, M.D., who retired after 30 years of service to Hennepin County - 20 of those years as medical examiner. Baker has extensive experience in forensic pathology, indudiog four years as an Air Force forensic pathologist His duties included forensic work surrounding the attack on the USS Cole and Sept. 11, 2001, Pentagon disaster. He also was part ora forensic team in Kosovo in 1999. Baker joined the Hennepin County Medical Examiner's Office as assistant chief medical examiner in 2002. Over the years, Hennepin County has had only three medical examiners: (i. to r.) Current ChlefMedical F.,~mlner Andrew Baker; Garry Peterson, who reti-r~'d-~i~r ihL~ yeak after · serving 20 years as medical examiner; and John Coe, medical examiner from 1963 to 1984. Dr. Coe wa~ the first medical ~-~rn;no.r in the State of Minnesota and was responsible for initiating the medical-examiner system. New library director apPointed The Hennepin County Board has appointed Amy E. Ryan, currently director of community partnerships and development for the Minneapolis Public Library, as director of the Hennepin County Library. Ryan succeeds Charles Brown, who left in January m become director of the Public Library of Charlotte and Mecklenburg .County in North Carolina. Ryan will assume her new position in January 2005. She brings 28 years of Amy Ryan experience in various community and leadership positions with the Minneapolis Public Library. She began with the system as a business librarian in 1976. She was chief of community libraries from 1995 m 2000, and in 2001 became director of community partnerships and development, which includes responsibility for community outreach, media relations, and development of relationships and partnerships. Hennepin County Administrator Sandra L. Vargas said Ryan's experience in building community partnerships was a key factor in her seiecrion. Ryan said she would continue that partnership building, including exploring ways in which the Minneapolis and suburban libraries can strengthen their work together. Human services standpoint - how can you help someone from a culture where issues such as mental illness are never discussed or even considered an issue? And some of it's from their unique experiences. What happens to a kid who grew up in a refugee camp and was forced into becoming a soldier and now moves to Minnesota and goes to middle school as a student?" Housing in general seems to be another major issue of concern. Hennepin has pushed for various affordable housing initiatives, but much of what is being developed now is for people at or near the continued from page 1 poverty line -- not for those who are extremely poor. ~And the reality is there's just not any housing available for the very poor," he said. Haats said he wished there had been a few more people at the meetings. But, he added, he was pleased by attendees as a whole. ~People were incredibly thoughtful. They recognize that there's not going to be a lot of new money and they recognize that it's not just the county that has to be at the table deciding these things. We're all in this together." -2459- Bird's eye view - 'l'he Government Plaza Station -- on Fifth Street City Hall - i~ the only station on the H3awatha Line that is divided, with between the Hermepin County Government Center and the Minneapolis a space in the middle to preserve the view of historlc City Hall. Opening weekend attracts 96,000 riders Approximately 96,000 people experienced light rail transit for themselves during the Hiawatha Line's grand-opening weekend, June 26 and 27. To celebrate the opening of LRT service, all rides on both the train and buses were free. Metro Transit, which operates the Hiawatha Line, reported about 52,000 train riders Saturday and another 44,000 Sunday. Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin -- a tong-time LRT proponent -- wa~ among the dignitaries who spoke at the first- train ceremony ar the Warehouse Disrrict/Hennepin Avenue Station and then rode on the first train that left downtown Minneapolis. In launching the line, speakers proclaimed the ~tart of service as a major milestone in the Twin Cities metro region's transporr, atlon history - nearly 50 years to the day since the old streetcars stopped running. Each s~ation along the line, including the Government Plaza Station on Fifth Street between the Hennepin County Government Center and City Hall, had its own celebration, with family entertainment, exhibits and great food. LRT opening ceremony - Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin addressed the crowd gathered for the Hiawatha LRT gr~nd- opening ceremony June 26. Other speakers included (1. to r.) Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Metropolitan Council Chair Peter Bell, Metro Transit General Manager Mike Setzer, U.S. Rep. Martin Sabo, U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman and Federal Transit A~I rnini.~a-ator Jenna Dora. -2460- Riders at the Government Plaza Station waited fi~r their turn to tide on the Hiawatha LRT Line on opening day. LRT riderShip Regular LRT service - with paying customers - began Monday, June 28, between downtown and Fort Shelling, with trains running 7 1/2 minutes apart during peak hours. Approximately 93,000 customers boarded Hiawatha light-rail trains during the first week of revenue operations June 28 through July 4. The first week of ridership exceeded by nearly 68 percent Metro Transits goal to average 55,400 rides each week through the end of the year. The f'mal four miles of the line - from Fort Shelling to the Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport to the Mall of America in Bloomington - will open in December, serving several major centers of employment, education and entertainment. ~'We need a gready improved transit system m ensure the region's transportation future for the next 50 years,~ McLaughlin said. ~Hiawatha LRT is the cornerstone oftha( system, which also will feature well- maintained highways, expanded use of buses and commuter-rail service. What we're trying to create is a transportation system that will help keep the Twin Cities a robust, economically productive region in what is a now a worldwide, competitive makes." Hennepin's role Hennepin County, through its Regional Railroad Authority, is a major partner in Hiawatha LRT, along with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (which built the line), the Metropolitan Council (which owns the line) and Metro Transit. During the mid-1990s, the Metropolitan Light Rail Transit Joint Powers Board (now the Metro Transitways Development Board), consisting of representatives of the seven metro counties, kept alive the idea of LRT as a key part of the region's future transit system. In 1998, the joint powers board - under the leadership of Mc. Laughlin - recommended that the Hiawatha Line be the first rail line in the metro area to be funded, setting the stage for state and federal funding. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority- in hopes of winning state and federal approval of the Hiawatha project- made advance right-of-way purchases, contracted for design studies and made significant cash contributions. Over the years, Heunepin committed $70 million to the construction of the Hiawatha Line and provided another $14 million for right-of-way acquisition and engineering. Waiting for the first LIlT vehicle to pull out of downto~ Minneapolis were 0. to r.) Anoka County Commissioner Dan Erhart, Hennepin County Commissioners Mark Stenglein, Linda Koblick and GaR Dorfman, former Anoka County Commi~ione~ Paul McCarron a~nd Hennepin County Commi~ioner Peter McLaaghlin, who chairs the county Regional Railroad Authority. Long-time LRT advocate George Isaacs, of the Minnesota Tnmsportation Museum, greeted riders. -2461 - the news Brookdate Regional Center reopens More than 6,000 people attended reopening festivities at Hennepin's Brookdale Regional Center May 8, featuring tours and exhibits, music, refreshments and opening remarks - by County Commissioner Mike Opat and other county ofiqdals. Opat said the two-year renovation and expansion of the regional center has more than doubled the providing northern county residents with new, stare-of-the-att fadlities. The major tenant of the regional center is the Brookdale Resource Library, where 22,000 square feet of space were added. The Brookdale Service Center (licensing), District Court, and sodal services and corrections offices also were expanded. The Library system reports that 6,580 items were checked out during the 5 ¼ hours the library was open May 8, averaging 20 items per minute. More than 84 percent ofthe materials were checked out through self-checkout mackiner. The regional center features floor- to-ceiling windows on the parking lot side, with two large rotunda entrances, creating an open and inviting look. The 'main street" inverior hallway links the different county service areas. Fixing potholes - a one-truck operation The Hennepin County Transportation Department has found a way to combat potholes more efficiendy and with fewer employees than in the past. The department's Operations Division now uses what is called a spray patcher, and this unique piece of equipment has proven to be very successful. Here's how the spray-patch truck work~: First, it deans, or blows out, the pothole. It then injects a "tack" oil. The next step is forcing oil and aggregate rock into the hole m create an asphalt mix. Finally, a dry aggregate cover is applied. Only one person is needed to operate the truck, compared with five or six employees required to fix a pothole from start to finish with the old hand-patch method. Other advantages are that injected pothole parches last four to five times longer and that more potholes can be repaired each day. Hennepin County Board of Commissioners · Mike Opar, lctDiwrict · Ma~k Stenglein, 2nd District, V. Chair · (;all Dorfman, 3rdDiarict · Peter McLaushlin, 4th District · Randy Johnson, 5th Disrrlct, Chair · Linda Koblick, 6th Distr~t · PennySteele, ?th District Sandra L. Va:gas County Administrator Richard P. Johnson Deputy County Administrator Meetings The County Board or it~ committee~ generally meet eveay 'rue*day at 1:30 p.m. Meetings take place on thc 24e' Floor of the Hennepin County Government Center. Broadcasts 'l'he County Board and committee meetings are broadcast live on Metro Cable Network/Channel 6. Each meeting also is broadcast on Channel 6 at 8 pan. the Friday following a meeting. 612-348-3081 w~w. hennepfn, us Comment Line: 612-348.HENN Hennepin hosts exhibit Alaska, Washington, D.C., Boston, New York and San Francisco. The next stop after Hennepin County was Rice Park in St. Paul. The exhibition was created by the Museum on the Seam in Jerusalem. The =Coexlatence" exhibit - consisting of 38 gigantic images meant to convey the most benevolent ideas, such as equality and fellowship - turned the Hennepin County Government Center North Plaza into an outdoor forum about getting along with one another this past spring. The exhibit has traveled around the world... Jerusalem, Berlin, Copenhagen, Belfast, Vienna, Miami... to name just a few of the dries. In addition to Minneapolis, the 2004 schedule includes Florida, Chicago, KANDIS HANsoN CITY UANG£R 534t MAYWOOD ROA~ UOUND UN 55364 m , ,a,, ,mi, ,,m~ I ~ ~ ,JL, · 'The Gillespie Gazette VOl, XII NO 8 August- ~004 J~ 22, 2004 .... " Dear Members, co~t of the f{~w~e~ production awu~l po~a~Je, w~ve ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ y~ ~e ~ r~, w~ ~ ~ ~e ~e ~ ~ ~ G i~4/p ~e Center Boo~d of D ~reotors -2464- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -2465- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith Date: 8/10/2004 Re: ERF Grant Agreement - Auditor's Road The City was recently notified that it was awarded an Environmental Response Fund (ERF) grant to conduct environmental testing in the Auditor's Road District following submittal of an application in May 2004. As part of the grant process, the City and Hennepin County are required to execute a grant agreement which requires approval by the City Council and Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. The grant contract was received via email on August 10, 2004 from Hennepin County. Due to time sensitivity, including the City's desire to complete the testinq activities by the end of the year (if possible) and the estimated 6-8 week turnaround time for ~ounty Board approval, Staff respectfully requests that the Council include the agreement as an add-on item at its August 10th meeting. For your review and consideration, a draft resolution has been prepared to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Grant Agreement with Hennepin County. Members of the Council are advised that the insurance provisions as contained in Section 9 of the grant agreement were reviewed by the LMCIT and deemed to be acceptable. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #04- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND TO FORMALLY ACCEPT AN ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND (ERF) GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,288.OO TO CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING IN THE AUDITOR'S ROAD DISTRICT AND EXECUTING ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND {ERF) GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Mound is undertaking redevelopment efforts in its downtown area and has entered into a preliminary development agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development (MHRD) for the development of the Lost Lake, Auditor's Road, and Lake Langdon Districts; and WHEREAS, to assist with the funding of the downtown redevelopment project, the City of Mound submitted and was awarded an Environmental Response Fund (ERF) grant from Hennepin County in the amount of $12,288.00 to undertaken environmental testing and preparation of a Response Action Plan (RAP) in the Auditors Road Development District; and WHEREAS, as part of the grant process, the City of Mound and Hennepin County Environmental Services are required to execute a grant agreement which required approval by the Mound City Council and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreement has been reviewed by Staff and was recommended for approval; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota to hereby accept the ERF 9rant award in the amount of $12,288 and does hereby authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Environmental Response Fund (ERF) Grant Agreement with Hennepin County. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council on August 10, 2004. and seconded by Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: To: Sent: Subject: "Gino Businaro" <GinoBusinaro@cityofmound.com> "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> Monday, August 09, 2004 4:27 PM Fw: Hennepin Cty Dept of Environmental Services Sarah: Info from our insurance agent on Henn Co Grant. Thank you. Gino ..... Original Message ..... From: <Pat_Me_~aj.g.co_m> To: <GinoBusinaro .~.~ity0~noun d. corn > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:10 PM Subject: Hennepin Cty Dept of Environmental Services > > > > Gino: Wanted to confirm that the LMCIT's policy meets the limits outlined and requested by Hezmepin County. Just a reminder, that any contractor the City hires to work under this agreement/contract, will have to meet or exceed the limits outlined by the County, and that you will have to make sure that the City has a renewal certificate on file fi'om the contractor for two (2) years after the completion of the job/project, to comply with the agreement. Should you have a question or a concern regarding a certificate received from a contractor with respects to the project, please fax a copy over and we will review the insurance information for you. Thank you. Pat Meger Account Manager A J Gallagher of MN, Inc. 7825 Washington Ave So., #300 Minneapolis MN 55439-2433 (952)918-3980-Direct Line (952)944-9795 -Fax 8/10/2004 Contract No. 040786 ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES This Agreement is made on by and between the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ("County" or "Grantor" at A2300 Government Center, Mpls, MN 55487) by and through its Department of Environmental Services ("Department") and the City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 ("Grantee"). Grantee has made application to the County for a grant to be used for assessment of a potentially contaminated site at the Auditor's Road District of Mound, which application is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1. GRANT AMOUNT AND COMPLETION The County shall grant to the Grantee a sum not to exceed twelve thousand two hundred and eighty-eight dollars ($ 12,288.00) which funds shall be only for expenses incurred in performing activities specified in the Application and as may be further described in Exhibit A to this Agreement or as approved by County staff. Approved environmental assessment and risk screening activities as may be described in the application and Exhibit A are referred to herein as the "Project". Administrative costs incurred by the Grantee are not eligible for reimbursement via this Agreement. Grantee agrees to complete the Project within one (1) year of execution of this Agreement and within the terms stated herein. Any material change in the scope of the Project, including time schedule and budget, must be approved in writing by the County. Funds made available pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for expenses incurred in performing such purposes and activities described in the Application and this Agreement. 2. ACCOUNTING AND RECORD KEEPING For all expenditures of funds made pursuant to this Agreement, the Grantee shall keep financial records including properly executed contracts, invoices, and other documents sufficient to evidence in proper detail the nature and propriety of the expenditures. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Grantee agrees that the County, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the Grantee and involve transactions relating to th is Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and eft'cot during the period of the Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 3. PAYMENT/DISBURSMENT SCHEDULE Grantor will disburse funds to Grantee pursuant to this Agreement, based on a payment request form provided by the Grantor, submitted by the Grantee and approved by the Grantor. Payment requests can be submitted once per month and must be accompanied by supporting invoices that relate to activities in the approved Project budget. Subject to verification of adequacy of a written disbursement request and approval of consistency with this Agreement, the Grantor will disburse the requested amount to the Grantee within four (4) weeks after receipt of a written disbursement request. 4. REPORTING Grantee shall submit to the Grantor a report on the distribution of funds and the progress of the Project covered from the date of the grant award through June 30 of each year. The reports must be received by the County no later than July 25 of each year. The report shall identify specific goals listed in the application and quantitatively and qualitatively measure the progress of such goals. Reporting forms will be provided by the Grantor. In'addition, the required documentation listed in Exhibit A should be supplied as it becomes available. 5. CONTRACTS Grantee shall include in any contract, provisions that require contractors to compl.x, with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations regarding employment and workplace safety. In accordance with Hennepin County's policies against discrimination, no person shall be excluded from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service, or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws, rules, or regulations against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination. Public Grantees and any contractors or subcontractors performing services as part of this Agreement shall follow that public Grantee's Affirmative Action policy against discrimination. 6. TERMINATION, CANCELLATION AND ASSIGNMENT This Agreement may be canceled by the County upon sixty (60) days written notice to the Grantee without cause. In the event of such cancellation, Grantee shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for work or services satisfactorily performed up to the effective date of such cancellation. If the County finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions ot' this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made toward commencement or completion of the environmental assessment and risk screening activities specified in the Application and this Agreement, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary and after written notice and reasonable opportunity to cure. the County may refuse to disburse additional funds and/or require the return of all or part of the funds ah'eady disbursed, to the extent such funds were used for purposes other than activities contemplated by this Agreement. This Agreement may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the County. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The Grantee shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the activities herein. Nothing is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co~partners between the parties hereto or as constituting the Grantee as the agent, representative, or employee of the County for any purpose or in any manner whatsoever. The Grantee is to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services and activities performed under this Agreement. Any and all personnel of the Grantee or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Grantee under this Agreement shall have no contractual relationship with the County, and shall not be considered employees of the County. Any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Wod<crs' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel, arising out of employment or alleged employment including without limitation, claims of discrimination against the Grantee, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the County. The Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, and employees from any and all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind whatsoever fi'om the County, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick leave, Workers' Compcnsat iota Re-employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the County, its officials, officers, agents and employees fi.om any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the ©rantee, its contractors or subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or any parly that directly or indirectly benefits from the activities specified in this Agreement, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the activities specified in this Agreement and against all loss by reason of the failure of theGrantee to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this Agreemem. Notwithstanding any provision of the Agreement to the contrary, Grantee reserves (and does not hereby waive) any del~enses and/or immunities which are available to it under applicable statutes or regulations, or at common law. 9. INSURANCE In order to protect the County and those listed above under the indemnification provision, the Grantee agrees at all times during the term of this Agreement and beyond such term when so required. ~(~ have and keep in force, the following insurance coverages under either a purchased insurance or under the statulory coverage limits provided through a self-insurance program: Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contr~ctual Liability Coverage: Limits General Aggregate Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage $1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1 ~000,000 Automobile Liability - Combined single limit each occurrence l'(~r bodily injury and property damage covering owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles. 1,000,000 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation If the contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota. coverage must apply to Minnesota laws. Statutory b. Employer's Liability. Bodily Injury by: Accident - Each accident Disease - Policy Limit Disease - Each Employee 100,000 500,000 100,000 4. Professional Liability - Per Claim and Aggregate 1,000,000 The insurance must be maintained continuously roi' a period of two years after the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the requirements of this Section 9, the Grantee shall require that any independent contractors rendering assessment and/or clean-up activities under this Agreement furnish ccrtificates of insurance to the Grantee of the insurance coverages listed above, and provide updated certificates as coverages expire. The Grantee shall not commence work until it and any contractors have obtained thc required proof of insurance which clearly evidences required insurance coverages. ,,, -" ,', I I, , , II ,lil I£tl~e Grantee Fails to furnish proo£o£insurance coverages from the independent contractors, if requested by the County, the County may withhold payments and/or pursue any other rights or remedy allowed under the contract, law, equity, and/or statute. ~ 10. MERGER AND MODIFICATION It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supercedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. 11. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and perl'ormance under it. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation hereunder will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involvhq~ the parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of'this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. The Remainder Of This Page Was Intentionally Lef't lllank COUNTY BOARD APPROVAL The City of Mound, having signed this agreement, and thc Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this agreement oll the __ day of ., , and pursuant to such approval, the proper County officials having signed this agreement, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein sci forth. ATTEST: By:. Deputy/Clerk of the County Board By: Chair of its County Board Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: And: Assistant/DepuLv/Cotm > Administrator By:. Date: Assistant County Attorney Date: Anti: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: By: Assistant County Attorney Date: RECOMMENDED FOIl APPROVAL By: l) irector. Date: Department CITY OF MOUND By: Its: And: Its: City organized under: Statutory~ Option A Option B Charter This Page Was Intentionally Left Blank Exhibit A City of Mound Proiect Summary: The City of Mound requests ERF funds for assessing and developing a Response Action Plan (RAP) for the Auditor's Road District. A portion of the Auditor's Road district was previously occupied by petroleum dispensers and underground storage tanks. An ERF grant of $12,288.00 is awarded to the City of Mound for a Phase II assessment of the Auditor's Road District, and the development ora RAP. The following costs are based on a budget submitted by the Grantee. Modifications must be approved in writing by the Grantor. Approved Budget for Auditor's Road District: Phase II assessment and RAP development $ 12,288 Total' $ 12,288 Required Documentation to be Submitted to Hennepin County: Consultant/Contractor/MPCA Invoices Phase II Report Response Action Plan MPCA Response Action Plan Approval Letter Annual Project Progress/Summary Report(s) E-1