Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2004-10-26
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 2. 3. 4. Call meeting to order Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes: October 12, 2004 regular meeting *B. Approve payment of claims Page 3072-3076 3077-3100 *C. Approve Public Gathering Permit for PoleBender Outdoors for fishing tournament weigh-in on May 22, 2005 *D. Approve Planning Commission Recommendations: 1. Case #04-36: Alleen Butterfield 4862 Leslie Road Front setback variance - upper floor addition to existing home *E. Action on resolution approving consent and waiver agreement from John Pastuck on behalf of J Pastuck Design/Build Corp to assess improvement costs in the amount of $7,373.10 to real estate taxes for 2005 for property located at 6375 Bartlett Boulevard (PID #23-117-24- 32-006) *F. Adopt resolution authorizing issuance of building permit for roofline modification and dormers for detached garage at 6033 Ridgewood Road Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) Public Hearings A. 2004 Street Reconstruction Project Assessmem Hearing Adopt Resolution Adopting Assessment for 2004 Street Reconstruction Project 3101-3102 3103-3109 3110-3122 3123-3124 3125-3139 8. 9. 10. 11. PLEASE TUI~I OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGE~ B. CBD Parking Maintenance Assessment Hearing Adopt Resolution Adopting Assessment for 2004 CBD Parking Maintenance C. Nuisance Abatement at 4717 Island View Drive Assessment Hearing and Adopt Resolution Adopting Assessment for Abatement Executive Session regarding John M. Anderson, et al v. City of Mound Action on status change for commons at 2128 Centerview Lane Action on 2004 rip-rap proposal Discussion regarding Jubilee Letter, with possible action Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Mediacom AMM LMCD 12. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. 3140-3142 3143-3146 3147-3148 3149-3153 3154-3157 3158 3159-3167 3168-3198 The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the Ci.tv of Mound web site: www. cityofmound com. COUNCIL BRIEFING October 26, 2004 Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Oct 22 - 4:40 p.m. - close applications .for Parks Commission & LMCD rep Oct 26 - 7:20 - HRA regular meeting (Note time change) Oct 26 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Oct 28 - 6:30 - Special meeting workshop - Docks Program Policies Oct 31 - Daylight Savings Time ends Nov 2 - 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. - General Election Nov 4 - 6:00 - 9:30 - Exclusive Wine Tasting Benefit - Burl Oaks Nov 8 - 7:30 - Interviews for Parks Commissioner and rep to LMCD Nov 9 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Nov 9 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Nov 16 - 6:30 - Key Financial Strategies with Ehler's & Associates Nov 18 - 6:00 - Tree Lighting Ceremony (Note time change) Nov 23 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Nov 23 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Dec 6 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation hearing Dec 13 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation hearing continuation, if needed Dec 14 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Dec 14 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Dec 28 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Dec 28 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Jan 11 - 7:30 - CC annual meeting & swearing-in upcoming Absences Dec' 16-27 Pat Meisel Vacation Admin Offices Closed Nov 11 Veteran's Day Nov 25-26 Thanksgiving Dec 23 (1/2 day) Christmas Dec 24 Christmas Dec 30 (1/2 day) New Years Dec 31 New Years Livable Communities Grant On Friday this week, Oct 22, we compete among a second round of applicants for the Livable Communities grant, in the amount of $2,4 million, to fill the gap for parking decks in the Auditor's Road and True Value Districts. The Mayor, Sarah, Bruce C and I will address the questions of the Livable Communities grant advisory committee. We are not predicted as a favored candidate, but will make a concerted push at acquiring these funds. We have just 15 minutes to convince them of the appropriateness of this funding, among 12 other cities. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 12, 2004 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, October 12, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, David Osmek and Peter Meyer. Others Present: City Attorney Mary Tietjen, City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, John Evans, Paul Waldron, Gene Zulk, Consent Agenda: Afl items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so request, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meeting Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve A_qenda MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent Agenda MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of September 28, 2004. B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $681,713.53. C. Approve payment requests 1. Payment Request No. 1 from Rosti Construction for $44,084,75 for the 2004 Retaining Wall Replacement Improvement Project 2. Payment Request No. 5 from Valley Paving for $101,976.80 for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project 3. Payment Request No. 10 from Environmental Associates for $48,905.17 for the Lost Lake Greenway Project D. RESOLUTION NO. 04-118: RESOLUTION APPROVING A PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING AT DAILEY'S PUB E. Set special meeting workshop to discuss Docks Program for October 28, 2004, at 6:30 p.m. 1 -3072- Mound City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 F. Approve Planninq Commission Recommendation RESOLUTION NO. 04-119: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE WAIVER OF PLATTING REQUEST FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 3225 DEVON LANE AND 4811 HANOVER ROAD FOR A LOT REARRANGEMENT. P&Z Case #04-35, PID #25-117-24-11-0025 & PID #25-117-24-11-0153 5. Comments and suR.qestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. John Evans, 2025 Arbor Lane, was present and expressed concern over maintenance issues of the Lost Lake Channel, and over the dumping of fertilizers into the channel. Meyer stated he is a citizen and wants to talk about an item relating to the 2005 budget. Discussion followed whether this item should have been added to the agenda when appropriate. Meyer asked for an interpretation from the City Attorney if he is allowed to speak as a citizen, and was informed that it is not a legal issue but a matter of council policy. Meyer asked if it is legal to refuse him to make a statement as a citizen and Tietjen answered that not knowing what the substance of the comments will be, if it has to do with an agenda item that the council the council should address it as a group instead of what his opinion is as a citizen. It's difficult to give a legal opinion because it's not a legal issue, rather a matter of procedure for the Council to decide. Hanus suggested have Meyer request the City Manager to add a budget workshop and discuss his points there inst_ead of public forum for his public campaign activities. Meyer stated there has never been a citizen not allowed to speak at the public forum and requests he be allowed his three minutes. Osmek commented he is comfortable to let Meyer be allowed his three minutes just to get on with the meeting, but the other candidates should be given the same opportun ty at the next council meeting. Meyer approached the podium as a citizen to discuss the street light and utility franchise fees, stating that these taxes should go to the general fund. 6. Public Hearin.qs A. Action on resolution adopting 2004 delinquent water and sewer assessments Mayor Meisel opened the hearing at 7:50 p.m. David Beahen, 1590 Eagle Lane, stated he received a sewer bill over $900/quarter, which is twice his usual annual usage and talked to Public Works who replaced the meter and then his bill went back to normal. He hasn't received feedback since the meter was replaced. It was the consensus of the Council to remove his property, PID 2 -3073- Mound City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 #13-117-24-12-0112 for $822.20 from the list included on the assessment resolution. His bill will be resolved by staff. Meisel closed the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution as amended, omitting PID 13-117-24-12-0112. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-120: RESOLUTION NO. 04-120: RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2004 DELINQUENT WATER AND SEWER ASSESSMENT TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST. LEVY #16150. 7. Update from School Superintendent Gene Zulk Gene Zulk addressed the public and Council regarding the state of the school district, and congratulated the council on the Lost Lake Greenway project, stating that the improvement of the downtown has positive impact on the schools. He also handed out information on the upcoming two levies that will be on the November 2® ballot. 8. Paul Waldron and Associates A. Introduction of Paul Waldron, consultinq buildinq official B. Action on ordinance repealing 300.01 and 300.20 and adopting a new chapter 300.02. It was noted that this is a basically a housekeeping item. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to pass the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. '- ORDINANCE NO. 10-2004: AN ORDINANCE REPEALING MOUND CITY CODE CHAPTER 300.01 (STATE BUILDING CODE), MOUND CITY CODE CHAPTER 300.05 (ORGANIZATION AND ENFORCEMENT) AND MOUND CITY CODE CHAPTER 300.20 (FEES) IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND ADOPTING A NEW MOUND CITY CODE CHAPTER 300.02 (MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE) WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE APPLICATION, ADMINISTRATION, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE BY REGULATING THE ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, ENLARGEMENT, ALTERATION, REPAIR, MOVING, REMOVAL, DEMOLITION, CONVERSION, OCCUPANCY, EQUIPMENT, USE, HEIGHT, AREA, AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND/OR STRUCTURES IN THE CITY OF MOUND, PROVIDES FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS, AND COLLECTION OF FEES THEREOF; PROVIDES PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF. 3 -3074- Mound City Council Minutes- October 12, 2004 C. Action amendinq ordinance amendinq Section 380 to the Mound City Code as it relates to establishinq land use fees for the City of Mound. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to pass the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 11-2004: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 380 TO THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ESTABLISHING LAND USE FEES FOR THE CITY OF MOUND. 9. Approve resolution orderinq preparation of report on 2005 Street Reconstruction project MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 04-121: RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON 2005 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 10. Board of Appeals and Adjustment: Review of Buildinq Permit Application - Gene & Brenda Peterson at 6033 Ridqewood Road Smith reviewed the case, stating that pursuant to city code, the City Council will review a building permit application submitted by Gene & Brenda Peterson to allow modifications to an existing detached garage at 6033 Ridgewood Road, which is currently non-conforming due to a deficient front setback. Recent amendment to State Statute 457.462 allows improvements to be made to non- conforming structures as long as they are not expanded. The question raised with the building permit is whether a roofline alteration and dormer construction which does not extend the non conforming front setback condition, is an expansion or an improvement. Mound City Code currently allows alteration of non-conforming structures as long as alteration or modification meets all provisions of the code. PC reviewed the case at its October 4th meeting and recommended that the roofline alteration qualifies as an expansion and therefore requires variance approval due to added bulk within the roofline. Council discussed the case, including the fact that the roof modifications do not expand the building footprint or increase hardcover and that there is no livable space within the detached garage, _therefore the use is not changing and the setback is not being increased. Council also discussed that the change in roofline does not expand the non- conforming front setback condition. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Hanus to approve the building permit and direct staff to prepare a resolution for the next agenda, making findings of fact that the project is not an expansion of a non-conforming condition. The following voted in favor: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Meyer. The following voted against: Osmek. Motion carried. 4 -3075- Mound City Council Minutes - October 12, 2004 11. Review of Membrane Structure Ordinance~ with any necessary action Smith gave a brief history of the membrane structure ordinance, stating that the most recently adopted ordinance and the draft proposed by the Planning Commission are included in the packet. Staff requested that Council give direction on what changes they want incorporated into the existing ordinance. Hanus thinks the ordinance is sufficient for commercial and business zones, however he would like to change residential zones so that membrane structures have to meet setbacks of other accessory structures. Osmek agrees with this restriction. Council directed staff to incorporate their suggestions into the existing ordinance and bring it back for consideration at the next meeting. 12. Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Correspondence: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District B. Minutes: September 20, 2004 Planning Commission October 4, 2004 Planning Commission 13. Adjourn MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to adjourn. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 5 -3076- OCTOBER 26~ 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 101304S U E$7,804.25 OCT 102004SUE $2,645.38 OCT 102104SUE $2,409.44 OCT 102104SUE $1,932.00 OCT 102604SUE $338,447.64OCT TOTAL $353,238.71 -3077- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name Refer 101304 City of Mound 10/13/04 9:55 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: October 2004 t 01304SU E User Dollar Amt $7,804.25 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $7,804.25 $0.00 In Balance BRAND NETWORKING Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay FA NETWORKING SERVICES $3,500.00 Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract NETWORKING SERVICES $343.75 invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract NETWORKING SERVICES $312.50 Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,156.25 Refer 101304 MCKINLEY, JOHN Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $1,214.75 Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,214.75 Refer 101304 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PAR Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 612-221-6740 $32.32 SWARTZER,BRIAN Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 612-221-6794 $13.78 TAFFE,JOHN Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 612-221-6812 $80.90 FACKLER,JIM Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 612-221-6813 $30.68 HOFF,KATIE Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 612-221-8385 $33.39 SWARTZER,BRIAN Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 612-282-5889 $8.99 Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 612-363-5883 $27.02 NORALNDER,JILL Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Transaction Date 10/7/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $227.08 Refer 101304 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 08-19-04 THRU 09-18-04 CELL PHONES $420.62 Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $420.62 Refer 101304 ST. MICHAEL, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training 10-28-04 SEMINAR, ROBERTS $15.00 invoice 101304 10/13/2004 PO 14878 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 101304 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-42110-381 Electdc Utilities 09-04 #2170-989-449-271 $708.22 Invoice 101304 10/13/2004 -3078- CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment invoice 101304 Transaction Date City of Mound 10/13/04 9:55 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: October 2004 E 222-42260-381 Electdc Utilities 09-04 #2170-989-449-271 $1,062.33 10/13/2004 10/5/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,770.55 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 10100 Wells Fargo $3,211.24 $1,062.33 $30.68 $3,500.00 $7,804.25 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $7,804.25 $7,804.25 -.3079- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 102004SUE Payments City of Mound Payments 10/19/04 11:17 AM Page 1 Current Period: October 2004 User Dollar Amt $2,645.38 Computer Dollar Amt $2,645.38 $0.00 In Balance Refer 102004 MEDINA ENTERTAINMENT CENTE Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 11-17-04 SEMINAR HAWKS,SHIRLEY $25.00 Invoice 102004 10/20/2004 PO 18474 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 11-17-04 SEMINAR DEBORD,JEANNE $25.00 invoice 102004 10/20/2004 PO 18474 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Invoice 102004 Cash Payment Invoice 102004 Transaction Date Refer 102004 MOUND POST OFFICE Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $120.11 10/20/2004 E 602-49450-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $120.00 10/20/2004 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240,11 Refer 102004 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 102004 10/20/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 102004 10/20/2004 Date 10/19/2004 08-27-04 THRU 09-26-04 CELL PHONES 07-27-04 THRU 08-26-04 Wells Fargo 10100 $52.85 $60.03 Total $112.88 Refer 102004 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (POL Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES . ~2,141.98 Invoice 102004 10/20/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wefts Fargo 10100 Total $2,141 Refer 102004 VERIZON WIRELESS (FIRE~FIN) Cash Payment Invoice 102004 Cash Payment Invoice 102004 Cash Payment Invoice 102004 Cash Payment Invoice 102004 Transaction Date E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 1 O/2O/2004 E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10/20/2004 E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 10/20/2004 E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 10/20/2004 10/15/2004 10-03-04 CELL PHONES #612-269-9058 BUSINARO,GINO $42.51 10-03-04 CELL PHONES 612-751-3572 ENGINE 18 $2.34 10-03-04CELLPHONES612-875-4502 RESCSUETRUCK $8.73 10-03-04 CELL PHONES 952-240-5244 HANSON,KANDIS $46.83 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.41 -3080- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND City of Mound Payments 10/19/04 11:17 AM Page 2 Current Period: October 2004 10100 Wells FaRo $2,394.20 $11.07 $120.11 $120.00 $2,645.38 Pre-Wdtten Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $2,645.38 $2,645.38 -3081 - ~. , ~ ..... Il ,ii ,1 ,J ,, Iii I i CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 1021045UE Payments Refer 102104 RAHN, JODI L. City of Mound 10/20/04 3:47 PM Page 1 Payments User Dollar Amt $1,932.00 Computer Dollar Amt $1,932.00 $0.00 In Balance Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents Invoice 102104 10/21/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 2004 DEPENDENT REIMBURSEMENT $1,932.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,932.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,932.00 $1,932.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $1,932.00 $1,932.00 -3082- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 102604SUE Payments City of Mound 10/21/04 2:04 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: October 2004 User Dollar Amt $338,447.64 Computer Dollar Amt $338,447.64 Refer 102604 ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFOR E 609-49750-438 Licenses and Taxes 10/26/2004 10/19/2004 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Transaction Date $0.00 In Balance RETAILER'S BUYERS CARD $20.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00 Refer 102604 ALDEN POOL AND MUNICIPAL SU Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals EJECTOR BODY $503.45 Invoice 401287 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals CHLORINE CHECK VALVES $119.28 Invoice 401270 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $622.73 Refer 102604 AMUNDSON, M. LLP Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $348.94 Invoice 167895 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $348.94 Refer 102604 ARCH WIRELESS Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies PAGERS $495.57 Invoice N3457459H 10/26/2004 PO 18405 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $495.57 Refer 102604 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 463428610 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo $'1~14.27 10100 Total $144.27 Refer 102604 ASSURED SECURITY Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings MAIN DOOR REPAIRS $254.89 Invoice 34811 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $254.89 Refer 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Transaction Date Refer 102604 A WD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 10/26/2004 E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 10/26~2004 E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 10/26/2004 10/11/2004 BELLBOY CORPORA TION Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R Invoice 39028300 10/2612004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 30886700 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 30909300 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R Invoice 39058400 10/26/2004 09-04 #10264400 $20.18 09-04 #10264400 $20.18 09-04 #10264400 $20,19 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60,55 MERCHANDISE $120.11 LIQUOR $2,756.85 LIQUOR $1,725.05 MERCHANDISE $39,65 -3083- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 30955400 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 30972100 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 30953700 10/26/2004 City of Mound 10/2 /042:04 PM Page 2 Payments LIQUOR $199.00 LIQUOR $1,895.60 LIQUOR $1,218.25 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,954.51 Refer 102604 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUP Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply LIGHT BULBS $139.89 Invoice 93989990 10/26/2004 PO 18537 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $139.89 Refer 102604 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 3/4 MINUS (CL 2) $1,515.92 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials 3/4 MINUS (CL 2) $1,515.91 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,031.83 Refer 102604 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHE Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous CRIME ALERT NETWORK $12.00 Invoice PO7 9800013965 10/26/2004 :tion Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12.00 Refer 102604 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply DELTHANE ADDITIVE $221.85 Invoice N40972 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE ROTOR $128.41 Invoice N40733 1012612004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BRAKE ROTOR $128.41 Invoice N41314 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply #25 OIL FILTERS $279.72 Invoice N41177 10/26/2004 PO 18605 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SWITCH,OIL $37.76 Invoice N39742 1012612004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair CIRCUIT BREAKER $11.89 Invoice N40142 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 1011912004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $808.04 Refer 102604 CEMSTONE CONCRETE SOLUTIO Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Matedal CEMENT $478.98 Invoice 194603 10/26/2004 PO 18536 Transaction Date 1011912004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $478.98 Refer 102604 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-04 THRU 09-21-04 #543-000-053-000 $31.02 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-04 THRU 09-21-04 #543-001-095-800 $43.18 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-04 THRU 09-21-04 #543-001-853-000 $47.48 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 -3084- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 10/21/04 2:04 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: October 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-04 THRU 09-21-04 #543-001-972-603 $20.68 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-04 THRU 09-21-04 #543-001-972-603 $20.68 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-04 THRU 09-21-04 #543-001-972-603 $20.67 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 08-19-04 THRU 09-21-04 #543-004-818-801 $18.11 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/t9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Totai $201.82 Refer 102604 CHAMPION AUTO Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair ON BOARD CHARGE/CLAMP $76.64 Invoice D285413 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.64 Refer 102604 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $180.40 Invoice 81383074 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.40 Refer 102604 COMPUTER CHEQUE Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract JULY/AUG/SEPT 2004 CHECK VERIFICATION $163.50 Invoice 106850904 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $163.50 Refer 102604 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 10-04 COPIER MAINTENANCE $340.80 Invoice 52473 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells'Fargo 10100 Total $340.80 Refer 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 100-1667 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $424.34 Refer 102604 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,295.70 invoice 2585014 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $65.60 Invoice 285922 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $798.10 Invoice 285921 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total- $2,159.40 Refer 102604 DISPLAYSALES Cash Payment G 101-22811 Banners WREATHS $1,712.52 Invoice INV0028547 10/26/2004 PO 18242 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,7t2.52 CUMMINGS NPOWER, LLC E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 08-31-04 SERVICE CALL $424.34 Refer 102604 DONS BUILDING AND REMODELIN Cash Payment G 101-22971 6017 Ridgewood #03-50 6017 RIDGEWOOD RD #03-50 $302.00 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $302.00 Refer 102604 E-ZRECYCLING -3085- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 7198 Transaction Date City of Mound 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 4 Payment Current Period: October 2004 E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-04 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $8,326.48 10/26/2004 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,326.48 Refer 102604 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,525.00 invoice 224895 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $81.00 invoice 45940 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $630.60 invoice 224993 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,236.60 Refer 102604 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 09-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $450.00 Invoice 23080 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00 Refer 102604 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $64.00 Invoice 242897 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.00 Refer 102604 FACKLER, JAMES Cash Payment E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE NRPA CONFERENCE $96.36 invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $96.38 Refer 102604 FIRE INSTRUCTORS ASSOC MINN Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 4TH ESS MANUAL $372.75 Invoice 49947 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $372.75 Refer 102604 FIRST STATE TIRE RECYCLING Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10-09-04 CLEAN-UP $470.00 Invoice 41328 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $470.00 Refer 102604 FLAG LOFT, THE Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FIRE DEPARTMENT FLAGS $92.50 Invoice 25748 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $92.50 Refer 102604 FOCUS SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 609-49750-409 Other Equipment Repair 08-24-04 SERVICE CALL $450.00 Invoice 21284 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00 Refer 102604 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-05-04 UNIFORMS $27.50 Invoice 6253810 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-05-04 UNIFORMS $27.50 Invoice 6253810 10126/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 10-05-04 UNIFORMS $27.49 Invoice 6253810 10/26/2004 -3086- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: October 2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 10-05-04 MATS $46.08 invoice 6253810 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 10-05-04 MATS $46.08 Invoice 6253810 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 10-05-04 MATS $46.08 Invoice 6253810 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 10-12-04 MATS $82.29 Invoice 6260327 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 10-12-04 MATS $21.29 Invoice 6260328 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 10-12-04 MATS $101.89 invoice 6260329 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 10-12-04 MATS $29.71 Invoice 6260322 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 10-12-04 MATS $38.55 Invoice 6260327 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $494.46 Cash Payment E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies 09-04 #5158501 $15.54 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 09-04 #32345800 $58.56 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $74.10 Refer 102604 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVIC Cash Payment E 101-42400-431 Meeting Expense 09-29-04 CONFERENCE, SMITH,SARAH $225.00 Invoice 11097 10/26/2004. Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $225.00 Refer 102604 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $390.05 Invoice 131563 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,116.99 Invoice 131564 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,109.62 invoice 128280 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $585.84 invoice 128281 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,202.50 Refer 102604 HA WKINS, INCORPORA TED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals CONTAINERS $20.00 Invoice DM109062 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 102604 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply PIPE $53.1'3 Invoice 51732 10/26/2004 PO 18607 Cash Payment $385.00 invoice 51736 Transaction Date Total $20.00 E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair FABRICATE BRACKETS FOR LADDERS 10/26/2004 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $438.13 -3087- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: October 2004 Refer 102604 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals Invoice 24098025 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals Invoice 24098024 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 09-04 RADIO LEASE $1,320.64 09-04 RADIO LEASE $1,001.04 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,321.68 Refer 102604 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training invoice 00086101 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 00086101 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 00086101 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training invoice 00086101 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 00086101 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 00086101 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 00086101 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 09-20-04 FIREFIGHTER CLASS 09-20-04 FIREFIGHTER CLASS RICKE,JERRY 09-20-04 FIREFIGHTER CLASS RICE,JASON 09-20-04 FIREFIGHTER CLASS FOLEY,MICHAEL 09-20-04 FIREFIGHTER CLASS CLEMONS,JOSHUA 09-20-04 FIREFIGHTER CLASS LEE,MARK 09-20-04 FIREFIGHTER CLASS ANDING,DERAK Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,994.55 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $4,114.55 Refer 102604 HERC-U-LIFT Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #13 HYDRAULIC HOSE FOR PLOWS $113.15 invoice 01P8456220 10/26/2004 PO 18598 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $113.15 Refer 102604 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $86.00 Invoice 342671 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/21/2004 Wells Fargo Refer 102604 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Payment Invoice 102604 G 101-22994 MHR Alternative Urban Area 10/26/2004 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs I0/26/2004 G 101-23111 Balboa Mini-Storage 10/26/2004 G 101~23012 4815 Islandview Dr #04-30 V 10/26/2004 G 101-23009 SuperAmedca CUP #04-26 10/26/2004 G 101-23010 5017 Avon Ddve, #04-29 Lin 10/26/2004 10100 Total 09-04 LATERNATIVE URBAN AREA REVIEW 09-04 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING 09-04 BALBOA MINI-STORAGE 09-04 4815 ISLANDVIEW DRIVE #04-30 09-04 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA 09-04 5017 AVON DRIVE #04-29 G 101-23011 3000 Highland Blvd #04-32/3 09-04 3000 HIGHALND #04-32/33 10/26/2004 $86.00 $6,294.31 $1,209.25 $127.50 $148.75 $85.00 $191.25 $170.00 -3088- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102600 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Transaction Date City of Mound 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 7 Payments Current Period: October 2004 G 101-22994 MHR Alternative Urban Area 10/26/2000 E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 10~26/2004 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 10/26/2004 E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2000 E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 10/21/2004 09-04 ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREA REVIEW 09-04 MOUND VISIONS 09-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE 09-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE 09-04 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 09-04 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAEP Wells Fargo 10100 $595.00 $1,206.25 $375.00 $3,167.84 $1,866.25 $1,925.01 Total $17,361.41 Refer 102604 HOME DEPOT/GECF Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 102604 Transaction Date E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 10~26~2004 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 10/26/2004 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 10/26/2004 E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts 10/26/2004 E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts 10/26/2000 10/20/2004 MESH,CLAMPS,ETC MESH,CLAMPS,ETC MESH,OLAMPS,ETC MESH,CLAMPS,ETC MESH,CLAMPS,ETC Wells Fargo $133.28 $133.28 $133.28 $132.06 $295.90 10100 Total $827.80 Refer 102604 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 63423216 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 10-09-04 THRU 01-08-05 CANON Wells Fargo 10100 Total $104.74 $104.74 Refer 102604 INFRATECH Cash Payment Invoice 0401837 Transaction Date G 602-16325 Distribution System 10/26/2004 10/18/2004 SEALED JOINTS IN 11 LINES Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20,962.70 $20,982.70 Refer 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 17088 Cash Payment Invoice 17090 Cash Payment Invoice 17133 Cash Payment Invoice 17149 Transaction Date ISLAND PARK SKELL Y E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #840 DISC ROTOR 10/26/2000 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #842 COMPUTER SCAN 10/26/2004 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #SILVER R&R ROTOR 10~26~2004 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #844 R&R ROTOR 10/26/2004 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $138.86 $159.41 $95,86 $95.86 $489,99 Invoice 0003588 Transaction Date Refer 102604 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVIC Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment RePair MACK 237 REPAIRS 10/26/2004 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $578.20 $578.20 -3089- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 8 Payments Current Period: October 2004 Refer 102604 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS Cash Payment E 101-41410~200 Office Supplies SUPPLIES $12.48 Invoice 227823 10/2612004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12.48 Refer 102604 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,202.90 Invoice 1795906 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $911.98 Invoice 1795907 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $277.20 Invoice 1795909 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $120.56 Invoice 1795910 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$11.62 Invoice 262014 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$12.02 Invoice 262015 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$15.17 Invoice 262016 10/26/2004 ' Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $968.10 lnvoice 1792464 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $227.69 invoice 1792465 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,580.31 Invoice 1792466 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $215.00 Invoice 1792467 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,464.93 Refer 102604 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 10-07-04 PIER GROUND BREAKING $62.00 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10-09-04 RECYCLE DAY $48.53 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10-09-04 RECYCLE DAY $3.89 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10-09-04 RECYCLE DAY $47.12 Invoice 102604 10126/2004 Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10-09-04 RECYCLE DAY $26.86 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $188.40 Refer 102604 KUSTOM SIGNALS Cash Payment E 101-42110-409 Other Equipment Repair #840 RADAR REMOTE $80.29 Invoice 210249 10/26/2004 PO 18464 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.29 Refer 102604 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVA TI Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 4TH QTR LEVY PAYMENT $4,895.13 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,895,13 -3090- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 9 Payments Current Period: October 2004 Refer 102604 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment invoice 4770 Cash Payment invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment Invoice 4770 Cash Payment invoice 4770 Transaction Date LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T E 101-41110-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $65.45 10/26/2004 E 101-41310-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $70.10 10/26/2004 E 101-41500-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $192.81 10/26/2004 E 101-42110-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $2,248.00 10/26/2004 E 101-42400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $227.87 10/26/2004 E 101-43100-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $843.55 10/26/2004 E 101-45200-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $195.00 10/26/2004 E 222-42260-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $5,584.94 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $806.30 10/26/2004 E 601-49400-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $1,161.25 1 O/26/20O4 E 602-49450-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $1,715.58 10/26/2004 E 281-45210-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 4TH INSTALLMENT WORKERS COMP $245.40 10/26/2004 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,376.25 Refer 102604 LYNN CARD COMPANY Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 2040927-107 10/26/2004 PO 18520 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 HOLIDAY CARDS Wells Fargo $72.47 10100 Total $72.47 Refer 102604 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment Invoice 722713 Cash Payment Invoice 722714 Transaction Date E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/26/2004 10/19/2004 BEER BEER WellsFa~o $1,184.25 $16.00 10100 Total $1,200.25 Refer 102604 MARLIN°S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment Invoice 14753 Cash Payment Invoice 14761 Cash Payment Invoice 14781 Cash Payment Invoice 14788 Cash Payment Invoice 14808 Cash Payment Invoice 14831 E 609-49750-265 Freight 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-265 Freight 10/26/2004 09-16-04 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-20-04 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-23-04 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-27-04 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-30-03 DELIVERY CHARGE 10-07-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $74.70 $18.00 $104.40 $8.1o $216.90 $149.40 -3091 - CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 14840 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 14861 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 City of Mound Payments 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 10 Current Period: October 2004 ~ !t.~\~ ~!~ ~ ~.~':: 10-1 t-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $12.60 10-14-04 DELIVERY CHARGE $106.20 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $690.30 Refer 102604 MATRX MEDICAL E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies REBREATHER MASKS,ETC $25.84 10/26/2004 PO 18459 E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies REBREATHER MASKS,ETC $29.32 10/26/2004 PO 18459 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $55.16 Cash Payment Invoice 867245 Cash Payment Invoice 866925 Transaction Date Refer 102604 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI Cash Payment Invoice 49044 Cash Payment Invoice 49045 Cash Payment Invoice 49046 Cash Payment Invoice 49047 Cash Payment Invoice 49048 Cash Payment Invoice 49049 Cash Payment Invoice 49050 Cash Payment Invoice 49051 Cash Payment Invoice 49052 E 427-43121-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 G 101-22869 Landgon Woods, 00-35 10/26/2004 E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 09-04 2002 SEAL COAT PROJECT Project 06173 09-04 MISC BLDG ENGINEERING Project 08901 09-04 MISC PLANNING ENGINEERING Project 08902 09-04 STORM SEWER PROJECT Project 10293 09-04 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT Project 12533 09-04 2355 CHATEAU WATERTOWER Project 12615 09-04 LANGDON WOODS DEVELOPMENT Project 12911 09-04 MCES LIFT STATION Project 13132 09-04 SKATE PARK PROJECT Project 13207 Cash Payment Invoice 49053 Cash Payment Invoice 49054 Cash Payment Invoice 49055 Cash Payment Invoice 49056 Cash Payment Invoice 49057 Cash Payment invoice 49058 Cash Payment Invoice 49059 Cash Payment Invoice 49060 Cash Payment invoice 49061 G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 09-04 WELLJPUMPHOUSE 10/26/2004 Project 13313 G 101-22890 2957 Cambridge Retain Wall 09-04 SKAALERUD LOT SURVEY 10/26/2004 E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 10/26/2004 E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 496-46580-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 10/26/2004 G 101-22910 WCA Bartlett Violation 10/26/2004 Project 13501 09-04 LOST LAKE/GREENWAY Project 13566 09-04 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT Project 13646 09-04 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT Project 13681 09-04 BAKER PROPERTY #02-13 VARIANCE Project 13746 09-04 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING Project 13747 09-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE Project 13832 09-04 SAREMPA WETLANE Project 13946 $53.00 $1,163.50 $53.00 $1,350.00 $1,166.00 $3,737.O0 $159.00 $53.OO $53.OO $2,164.73 $53.OO $2,243.40 $188.40 $198.00 $106.00 $53.OO $339.40 $106.00 -3092- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 49062 Cash Payment Invoice 49063 Cash Payment Invoice 49064 Cash Payment Invoice 49065 Cash Payment Invoice 49066 Cash Payment Invoice 49067 Cash Payment Invoice 49068 Cash Payment Invoice 49069 Cash Payment Invoice 49070 Cash Payment Invoice 49071 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 11 Current Period: October 2004 09-04 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION Project 14121 09-04 BRENSHELL/LEE MINOR SUB-DIVISION Project 14146 09-04 2241 SOUTHVIEW #03-10 Project 14275 E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 G 101-22906 Waiver of Platting #02-22 10/26/2004 G 101-22931 2241 Southview Ln,03-10 W 10/26/2004 G 101-22975 6185 Sinclair Rd #03-46 Plat 09-04 2420 WESTEDGE #03-39 Project 14550 09-04 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION Project 14615 09-04 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Project 14702 09-04 2004 RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS Project 14707 10/26/2004 E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 10/26/2004 G 101-22995 6381 Walnut Lane Grading P 09-04 6381 WALNUT LANE GRADING 10/26/2004 Project 14822 G 101-23014 4872 Leslie Rd. #04-34 Varia 09-04 4872 LESLIE RD #04-34 10/26/2004 Project 14988 E 401-43103-300 Professional Srvs 09-04 2005 STREET RECONSTRUCTION 10/26/2004 Preject 15000 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 102604 METRO FIRE $1,656.40 $53.00 $87.30 $106.00 $21,417.10 $737.0O $3,574.20 $475.50 $53.00 $3,970.00 $45,368.93 Cash Payment Invoice 18974 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Re;air FIBERGLASS REPLACEMENT HANDLE KIT Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.47 $47.47 Refer 102604 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVlR Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MClS Invoice 782580 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Refer 102604 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment E 609-49750-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings Invoice 103009080 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 11-04 WASTEWATER $56,217.47 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $56,217.47 09-06-04 WINDOW WASH $37.28 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.28 Refer 102604 MINNESOTA INTERTECHNOLOGIE Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Refer 102604 MORRELL AND MORRELL, INCOR Cash Payment Invoice 8067 Cash Payment Invoice 8108 Transaction Date E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10/26/2004 E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10/26/2004 10/15/2004 AREA WIDE NETWORK $1,850.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,850.00 10-09-04 RECYCLE DAY 10-09-04 RECYCLE DAY Wells Fargo 10100 $1,485.69 $1,342.47 Total $2,828.16 Refer 102604 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 10-04 COMMON MAINTENANC AREA $735.25 -3093- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 10/19/2004 City of Mound Payments 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 12 Current Period: October 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $735.25 Refer 102604 MOUND, CITY OF Cash Payment G 202-20800 Due to Other Governments ADMIN,FINANCE,COMPUTER,AUDIT $1,113.50 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/21/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,113.50 Refer 102604 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-17-04 BANK FILL $67.26 Invoice 98079-A 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials 09-17-04 BANK FILL $67.26 Invoice 98079-B 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-16-04 BANK FILL $43.85 Invoice 98080-A 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials 09-16-04 BANK FILL $43.85 Invoice 98080-B 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-20-04 BLACKTOP $552.86 Invoice 98209 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-23-04 BLACKTOP $245.28 invoice 98400 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-24-04 BANK FILL $154.41 Invoice 98471-A 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials 09-24-04 BANK FILL $154.40 98471-B 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-28-04 BLACKTOP $190.80 Invoice 98725 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 09-29-04 BLACKTOP $21.08 Invoice 98854-A 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials 09-29-04 BLACKTOP $21.08 Invoice 98854-B 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 09-21-04 CONCRETE $153.50 Invoice 98286 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 09-02-04 CONCRETE $79.93 Invoice 97431 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,795.56 Refer 102604 NASH SALES, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 10-09-04 CITY CLEANUP $200.00 Invoice 0002152-1N 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 102604 NAVARRE CITGO Cash Payment E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 10-04-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $101.01 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101.01 Refer 102604 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $323.00 Invoice 27809 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $323.00 Refer 102604 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN -3094- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 30871 Cash Payment Invoice 30871 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 13 Current Period: October 2004 E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply BALL HITCH, BOLTS, ETC $244.94 10/26/2004 PO 18606 E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts BALL HITCH, BOLTS, ETC $163.97 10/26/2004 PO 18606 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $408.91 Refer 102604 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 09-04 LOCATES $120.75 Invoice 4090562 10~26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 09-04 LOCATES $120.75 Invoice 4090562 10/26~2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $241.50 Refer 102604 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 8049177 10126/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8049113 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8049415 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8049746 10~26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 8049522 10/26/2004 Transaction Date -$12.00 $123.00 $1,007.43 $231.00 -$4.00 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,345.43 Refer 102604 PEARSON BROTHERS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 401-43104-500 Capital Outlay FA BITUMINOUS MATERIAL $37,337.50 Invoice 992 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37,337.50 Refer 102604 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 62849535 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo $60.40 10100 Total $60.40 Refer 102604 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment Invoice 2124096 Cash Payment Invoice 2124097 Cash Payment Invoice 2124098 Cash Payment Invoice 3306661 Cash Payment Invoice 2121507 Cash Payment invoice 2121508 Cash Payment Invoice 2121509 Cash Payment Invoice 2121510 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 10~26~2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 10126/2004 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 10~26~2004 $455.40 $264.70 $34.75 -$24.00 $568.80 $2,911.25 $50.00 $46.00 -3095- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 10/15/2004 City of Mound Payments 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 14 Current Period: October 2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,306.90 Refer 102604 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $167.07 Invoice 48204 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $167.07 Refer 102604 PROTECTION ONE Cash Payment ' E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-16-04 THRU 01-15-05 #1268011 $47.60 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-16-04 THRU 01-15-05 #12681011 $47.60 Invoice 102604 10126/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 10-16-04 THRU 01-15-05 #12681011 $47.60 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $142.80 Refer 102604 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,630.49 invoice 466260-00 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $929.91 Invoice 465882-00 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $48.68 invoice 465879-00 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $83.50 Invoice 462938-00 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $512.93 Invoi~:e 462937-00 10126/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,514.96 Invoice 463545-00 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,720.47 Refer 102604 SCHARBER AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair COUPLING AND OIL FILTERS $66.02 Invoice 0202043560 1012612004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.02 Refer 102604 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533Tree Removal Invoice 5197 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 2549 EMERALD DRIVE Wells Fargo 10100 $2,353.65 Total $2,353,65 Refer 102604 SOS PRINTING Cash Payment E 601-49400-203 Pdnted Forms WORK ORDERS Invoice 65636 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo $165.71 10100 Total $165,71 Refer 102604 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (FIR _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 09-26-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $477.44 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wefts Fargo 10100 Total $477,44 Refer 102604 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA GENERATOR REPAIR $170.00 invoice 8345 10/26/2004 -3096- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: October 2004 Refer 102604 STREICHER°S Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies Invoice 1212665 10/26/2004 PO 18469 Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1212665 10/26/2004 PO 18428 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Refer 102604 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRES Invoice 10029430 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 15 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities CROSS WALKS STREET LIGHTS $887.50 Invoice 8346 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,057.50 #9 NITRO POWDER $18.05 #9 NITRO POWDER $779.95 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $798.00 $451.39 10100 Total $451.39 Refer 102604 SUN NEWSPAPERS Cash Payment E 601-49400-328 Employment Advertising Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/15/2004 Refer 102604 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment invoice 34562 Cash Payment Invoice 350613 Cash Payment Invoice 350614 Cash Payment Invoice 34659 Cash Payment Invoice 34270 Transaction Date E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/28/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/26/2004 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 10/26/2004 10/11/2004 10-06-04/10-13-04 MAINTENANCE $400.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $400.00 BEER $206.00 BEER $114.45 BEER $1,970.05 BEER $44.00 BEER $236.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,570.50 Refer 102604 THRIFTY WHITE DRUG STORE Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 721447 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 696951 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 PHOTO PROCESSING PHOTO PROCESSING WellsFargo 10100 $5.62 $5.3O Total $10.92 Refer 102604 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Sen/lc MAINTENANCE CONTRACT Invoice 17388 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 $2,320.00 Total $2,320.00 Refer 102604 TROPHIES BYLINDA Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous CHERRY FRAME Invoice 13236 10/26/2004 PO 18468 Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous PLATES Invoice 13267 10/26/2004 PO 18468 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo $13.05 $15.40 10100 Total $28.45 Refer 102604 TRUE VALUE, MOUND -3097- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 10121104 2:05 PM Page 16 Payments Current Period: October 2004 Cash Payment E i01-4ili0-2i0 Operating Supplies KEYS $22.22 Invoice X15609 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.22 Refer 102604 TWIN CITY'OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies $315.00 Invoice 442684-0 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $29.87 Invoice 441517-0 10/26/2004 PO 18470 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $210.00 Invoice 442376-0 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies $45.32 Invoice 442741-0 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies $69.87 Invoice 442784-0 10/26/2004 PO 18652 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies -$12.75 Invoice C442039-0 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies $88.55 Invoice 442039-2 10/26/2004 PO 18472 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies $239.45 Invoice 442432-0 10/26/2004 PO 18651 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies $12.84 ~ Invoice 442273-0 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $998.15 Refer 102604 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Cash Payment E 10%42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms INITIAL ISSUE SCHWALBE $1,177.89 Invoice 240359 10/26/2004 PO 18461 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,177.89 Refer 102604 WALDRON, PAUL A. AND ASSOCIA Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs THRU 10-15-04 BUILDING INSPECTIONS $5,800.00 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,800.00 Refer 102604 WEIST, KATHY Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies REIMBURSE SUPPLIES $18.06 invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies REIMBURSE SUPPLIES $10.63 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/11/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $28.69 Refer 102604 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,333.30 Invoice 100398-00 10126/2004 Transaction Date 10/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,333.30 Refer 102604 WINEDOCTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $340.00 Invoice 10689 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $364.00 Invoice 20823 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/18/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $704.00 INK JET CARTRIDGE DISKETTES,POST-IT, RULED PADS TONER UNFRAMED DOOR WALL SIGN DAY WALL ORGANIZER CREDIT-TAPE DVD INK JET CARTRIDGE SEALING TAPE -3098- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: October 2004 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 17 Refer 102604 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,075.00 Invoice 106826 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/19/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1.075.00 Refer 102604 WINKLER, BOB Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Material~ BANKFILL $843.60 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials BANKFILL $843.60 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material BANKFILL $672.45 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials BANKFILL $1,105.95 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials BANKFILL $1,105.94 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/20/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,571.54 Refer 102604 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 #2245-301-939 $27,010.50 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 ~;)466-607-233 $43.98 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 #0217-606-329 $6,274.58 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 #0047-005-229 $450.41 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 #0864-508-832 $354.79 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 #0864-508-832 $354,79 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 ~)864-508-832 $354.79 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 ~0018-802-634 $3,369.37 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 08-26-04 THRU 09-27-04 ~O009-604-835 $513.05 Invoice 102604 10/26/2004 Transaction Date 10/18/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $38,726.26 -3099- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 202 COMMUNITY DEV BLK GRANT 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 427 SEAL COAT FUND 455 TIF 1-2 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND City of Mound Payments 10/21/04 2:05 PM Page 18 Current Period: October 2004 10100 Wells Fargo $75,252.22 $1,113.50 $13,428.69 $245.4O $73,989.86 $53.OO $2,372.25 $1,903.00 $20,057.06 $87,801.3O $48,930.32 $11,951 .O4 $1,35O.OO $338,447.64 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $338,447.64 $338,447.64 -3100- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com October 21,2004 TO: FROM: RE: Mayor and City Council Bonnie Ritter Public Gathering Permit Application A Public Gathering Permit application has been received from Pole Bender Outdoors to hold a fishing tournament weigh-in at Mound Bay Park on May 22, 2005. The $300 fee has been received. printed on recycled paper -3101 - CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Area to be Used Time Frame Intended Use Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY ~~/~q~(~ Date of Use /~ ~ o~./ GloO~ .'oo / Expected Attendance Organization Representative's Name Address ?,~ Telephone No. iiome: ..q"~- ~'~,tTt~ ~ ~' Work: :~,~ ~ Departmental Approval -3102 City Clerk Police Dept. Park Dept. Fire Dept. 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Comm. Dev. Director Sarah Smith DATE: October 19, 2004 SUBJECT: Variance - front setback for attached garage ADDRESS: 4862 Leslie Road APPLICANT: ^lleen Butterfield PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 04-36 PID: 24-117-24-41-0025 ZONING: R-lA Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND At its October 18, 2004 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the application from Alleen Butterfield for a variance to allow construction of an addition over the existing garage portion of the house. The requested variance is outlined below: Existing Proposed Required Variance Front (6.6) ft (6.6) ft (20) ft (13.4) feet Details regarding the project are contained in Planning Report No. 04-36 which is on file in the Planning and Building Inspections Department and will be provided to members of the City Council upon request. SITE CONDITION The subject property includes a single-family dwelling with attached garage which fronts Leslie Road. The applicant proposes to construct an upper floor addition on the garage portion of the house to include 2 bedrooms, a bathroom and laundry room. Currently, the existing house is located in a nonconforming location due to a deficient front setback. Members of the Council are advised that Resolution No. 82-213 approved a (14) foot variance to allow a 6 foot setback for the garage addition in 1982. An updated survey was submitted with the application which demonstrates current conditions. -3103- PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW I RECOMMENDATION In general, the Planning Commission was favorable to the request as the nonconformity is not being increased and no new nonconforming conditions are being created. Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted eight (8) in favor and one (1) opposed to recommend approval of the variance application as recommended by Staff subject to conditions. A copy of the October 18, 2004 Planning Commission meeting minutes excerpts has been included as an attachment. Additionally, a draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has also been provided. -3104- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION AT 4862 LESLIE ROAD P & Z CASE # 04-36 PID # 24-117-24-41-0025 WHEREAS, the applicant, Alleen Butterfield, has requested variance approval to allow construction of an upper floor addition to an existing home at Leslie Lane; and WHEREAS, the requested variance is described as follows Existinq Proposed Required Variance Front (6.6) ft (6.6) ft (20) ft (13.4) feet and; WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned R-lA Single Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the subject property includes a single-family dwelling with attached garage which fronts Leslie Road. The applicant proposes to construct an upper floor addition on the garage portion of the house to include 2 bedrooms, a bathroom and laundry room. Currently, the existing house is located in a nonconforming location due to a deficient front setback; WHEREAS, Resolution No. 82-213 was adopted on August 3, 1982 granting variance approval to allow a front setback of (6) feet to construct the existing attached garage; and -3105- ~lllllllu.~.,. I Il ~l ,i ,IL ,, il~ il WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 350:530, Subd. 1 states that a variance may be issued to provide relief to a landowner where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his/her property if certain circumstances exist; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its October 18, 2004 meeting as required by the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota asfollows: The City does hereby approve the requested variance subject to the following condition(s): A. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved fees associated with the variance request. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. C. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. D. Applicant shall 'l~e responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. 2. Upon granting the variance request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: Ao Resolution No. 82-213 granted variance approval for the property to allow a reduced setback of (6) feet for the existing attached garage. The proposed upper floor addition will also maintain the same setback which is (6.6) feet from the front property line according to the new survey. An additional variance was approved in 1991 which recognized the existing front setback and allowed construction of a deck on the east side of the property. Due to the constructed location of Leslie Road, the front setback of the existing house appears significantly more than (6.6) feet and is actually located (34) feet from the curb on the east side of the road. -3106- C. Topography on the subject property slopes upward from Leslie Road to the east along the north side. Construction of an addition in the rear of the property diminishes the applicant's use of the backyard and also does not function with the layout of the existing house. E. The upper floor addition has been designed to fit in with the internal layout of the house. F. Construction on the north side and east side increases hardcover as .... t he_se_area(s)a r_e_currently "g reerL'LJ~dditio n ally~co n st ru ctien~)f_a~ addition on-line north side WOuld also likely require variance approval as the existing house (at its closest point) is (16) feet from the property line, G. Construction of a similar sized addition on the south side can not occur without a variance. Ho Hardcover is currently under the 40 percent allowance by 114 SF according to the Hardcover Calculation Sheet submitted by the applicant. Construction of the proposed upper story addition does not increase hardcover. I. The criteria for granting a variance as set forth in City Code Chapter 350:530 hav. e been met. 3. This variance is approved subject to the following conditions: A. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. C. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. D. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. -3107- 4. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Lot 14 and the Northwesterly 35.00 feet of Lot 15, Block 21, Wychwood This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 6. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution ~dthH.e~ne~ounty and paying_for all costs for~such~ecording A ~i__.__ building~ermitforthe~subject construction shalLnot be_issued untiLpr°°f of recording I~s~een filed With the City Clerk. · 7, The vadance is valid fopone(l.)-yearJollowing its-approval-unless extensienJs approved-by theCity--Couneitt~ursuant-to~heCity-Code 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). Applicant shall be required to submit a written request at least 30 days preceding 1-year deadline of the original approval date by the City Council. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilm_embers voted in the negative: Adopted October 26, 2004 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -3108- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 18, 2004 CASE #04-36 VARIANCE UPPER FLOOR ADDITION TO EXISTING HOME ALLENE BUTTERFIELD The applicant has submitted a request for a front yard variance to allow construction of ~n additinn nv~.r the ~.yi.~fin~n n~r~nR nnrfinn nf fh~ hmm~ Th~ vnrinn~ r~m~f i~ n~ follows: Front -Setback -ExiSting 6~ proposed Required 6.6 ff 20 ff Vanance 13.4 fi------ Staff recommends approval of the varianCe With the follOWing Conditions: applicant shall be responsible for ~'~t of all involved fees associated 1. The with the variance request. 2. No future approval of any dev~~ans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in t~variance application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be requi~u'brnit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4.Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. A discussion ensued regarding the law regarding recognizing non-conforming conditions. Councilmember Mark Hanus, 4446 Denbigh Road - He believes that the law says a non-conformity always remains a non-conformity. Granting a variance makes it a legal non-conformity. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Raines, to approved staff recommendation. Mueller says it's an existing conditioning that does not adversely impact the area. MOTION carried. Voting for: Jorj Ayaz, Becky Glister, Cklair Hasse, David Miller, Michael Mueller; Dave Osmek, Greg Raines and Jon Schwingler. Voting against: Michael -3109- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 04- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AND WAIVER AGREEMENT FROM JOHN PASTUCK ON BEHALF OF J PASTUCK DESIGN/BUILD CORP AND TO CERTIFY TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST, IMPROVEMENT COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $7373.10 TO REAL ESTATE TAXES FOR 2005 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6375 BARTLETT BOULEVARD PID # 23-117-24-32-0066 LEVY #16154 WHEREAS, -Inhn P2~h mlcc:;J/b/.q J_P~stuck Design / RI dlrl ¢.nrn ("¢lwnpr"/ iq fh¢ owner of the property lOcated at 6375 Bartlett Boulevard ("Property"); and ........ WHEREAS,-Resolutior~NoC~-4~vas~adopt~ nd-Gity~ou ncil-on Aug-ust-2772002 for a-minorsubdMsiorrwhich-includestheP-ropertyFand WHEREAS, the minor subdivision was approved subject to conditions including, but not limited to, all conditions in the City Engineer's Report dated August 1, 2002. Specifically, Condition 2 required the preparation of final storm sewer plans and Condition 5 required the completion of all private utility work; and WHEREAS, Building Permit No. 16029 was issued on Aug. 11, 2003 for new single-family home subject to conditions including those referenced on City Engineer memorandum dated July 31,2003 requiring completion of all private utility work unless financial security was submi.tted to ensure satisfactory completion of the required site and utility work; and WHEREAS, a letter of credit in the amount of $8875.00 was submitted by the Owner to guarantee construction and completion of the storm drain and catch basin so as to allow issuance of a building permit for a new house on the east lot prior to the completion of the work; and WHEREAS, the Owner agreed to have the City undertake and complete a portion of the private utility work as part of 2004 City Improvement Project including payment thereof for all improvement costs; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that the cost of the private improvements on the Property is $7373.10; and WHEREAS, the Owner has signed a Petition and Waiver Agreement with the City of Mound to provide that the improvement costs for the Property would be assessed to the Property for collection with real estate taxes for 2005; and -3110- Resolution No. 04- NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: To assess all improvement costs in the amount of $7373.10 to the property located at 6375 Bartlett Boulevard to the 2005 real estate taxes as set forth in the Petition and Waiver Agreement signed by John Pastuck on behalf of J Pastuck Design/Build Corp. 2. Such assessment shall be made payable in one payment at the rate of 6% interest, and will be certified as Levy #16154, Improvement Costs for 6375 ~.,~,~ ~.-,,,~ ..... ,~ D~n ~'~'~ ~7 24 32 09~. days (November 26, 2004) from the date the City Council adopts the ........... Payn~ents-'--'"-' .......... '-- "'"" "' .............. Muund City Hall. Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section 370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00 increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be accepted. If the assessment is not paid on or before November 26, 2004, the amount will be spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2004, and all of 2005)= Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3. 6. The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period is six percent (6%). o The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October, 2004. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -3111- PETITION AND WAIVER AGREEMENT I am the owner of property located at 6375 Bartlett Boulevard in the City of Mound, Minnesota, 55364, described in the Hennepin County Tax System as Property ID No. 23-117-24- 32-0066 which is legally described as: That part of the west 150.00 feet of that part of Government Lot 5 lying south of State Highway No. 110 and running to Halstad Bay, Lake Minnetonka, Section 23, Township 117 North, Range 24 West and also lying northerly ofthe foltowingdescribed'tine: Commencing at the _n_orth west comer of Rol!L-_g Shores, accorai,,g to t_he plat *~ereef on file ........ _or_of recordgn__the offic~of..thexe_gis*er o_.f::Deed5 S6fi~fi~'~on ~~¢gb~h~ of S0mh along the west line Of Said Rolling Shores and the east line of the west 150.00 feet of said Government Lot 5, a distance of 170.00 feet to the s ....... West a ....~-,mee-ofq 52.6, fect to ,,,. ,~,.~[of said '" terminating. Which lies easterly of a line drawn 75.00 feet westerly of and parallel with the easterly line thereof. My property is part of a minor subdivision that was approved by the City of Mound City Council on August 27, 2002, per Resolution No. 02-86 (See Exhibit A), The City Council approved the minor subdivision subject to several conditions (See City Engineer memorandum attached as Exhibit B). One of the conditions required me to install new water, sewer, and stormsewer service to serve the property involved in the minor- subdivision. Building Permit No. 16029 was issued on August 11, 2003 subject to several conditions including the completion of water, sewer and stormsewer service to serve the property (See Building Permit and City Engineer memorandum attached as Exhibit C.) As £mancial security for the required construction and completion of the storm drain and catch basin, I submitted a letter of credit to the City of Mound in the amount of $8,875.00. I did not install the new water service as required by the City. Rather, the City undertook the work and completed installation of a portion of the required storm sewer improvements as part of its 2004 Street and Utility Project. I am now hereby petitioning the City of Mound to assess t00 percent of the cost of the installation of the storm sewer improvements to my property. I understand that the costs that I am requesting be assessed include the following: Storm sewer improvements required for minor subdivision approved in Resolution No. 02- 86 for a total amount orS 7373.10. These costs are referred to as "Charges". I acknowledge and agree that these Charges are valid and legal charges and that I am obligated to the City in the amount of $7373.10 for the costs associated with the project. MDT-200362v 1 3_ RC 160-4 - -3112- I request that 100 percent of the Charges be levied as a special assessment against my property for collection with my real estate taxes in the year 2005. I understand that I may pay the entire amount of the assessment within 30 days after the council adopts the assessment rolls, without may charge of interest. If I elect not to pay the entire amount of the assessment within 30 days, I understand that I am obligated to make annual installments over the number of years allowed by the council. I also understand that these installments include interest at a rate to be determined I also understand that state law gives me the right, to appeal the levy of special assessments ~agg!_n~p_rpp._e. rty. _.!___he_r_e_.b_y..wai_~e _my_ _right.._t_o appeal the_le~vY o_f spec!al ~_ssessme_n~ ~at are ..... levied-in'aecord~ce'-with 'the terms of this Petition and Waiver Agreement;-inctuding the rightto challenge the amount or validity of the assessment or the procedures used by the City in levying the assessment. I further agree that the payment of the Charges will-eontinue to beamy personal- obligation until they are paid and that I will pay any part of the Charges which the City is unable to collect through special assessments. (/~~~//~/~______/// Dated: ~(~ ~) ,2004. /~'/ J e~sig/15astuck on bel~alf ofJ Pastuck n/Build Corp. MDT-200362v I 2 RC 1604 -___ -3113- EXMIBIT A CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and the Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: l::r:-'As SU-ch ~oTficer~ I have'the leg~lcUStody of the original record from which the attached and forgoing extract was transcribed. 2. I have carefully compared said extract with said original record. __ ..... 3. I fi~-d said e~t-ra~t t~)be~-~ru~ C°rre(~t-and ~0mple~eir-anscript from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held of the date indicted in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 02-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6380 BAY RIDGE ROAD '- P & Z CASE #02-12 PID #23-117-24-32-0065 Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on the 27"~ day of August, 2002. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 28th day of August, 2002. I~°~nie Ritter, City Clerk -3114- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 02-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6380 BAY RIDGE ROAD P & Z CASE # 02-12 PID # 23-117-24-32-0065 WHEREAS, the applicant, John Pastuck, has submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create two buildable parcels from a vacant existing non-lot of record; and, WHEREAS, the parcel consists of about 28,429 square feet and has about 150 feet of frontage on Bartlett Blvd. (CSAH 110). It is located between High View and Halstead Lanes and is not currently assigned a property address. The property is legally described in Exhibit "A", and; WHEREAS, the request meets all requirements of the zoning and subdivision codes that pertain to lot area, lot width, building setbacks, and hardcover. The following are the development standards proposed for Parcels A and B: Proposed Required Parcel ,,t Lot Area 13,679 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. Lot Width 75 feet 60 feet Sideyards 10 feet min. 10 feet Frontyard 30 feet min. 30 feet Hardcover 2,962 sq. ft. (21.6%) 30% max. 1 -31.15- Pared t~ Lot Area 13,016 sq. fi. 10,000 sq. ft. Lot Width 75 feet 60 feet Sideyards 10 feet min. 10 feet Frontyard 30 feet min. 30 feet Hardcover 2,892 sq. ft. (22.2%) 30% max. ; and, WHEREAS, the property was previously subdivided as referenced by City Council Resolution#98-44. A condition of that resolution to dedicate right-of-way along Bartlett Blvd. ..... ~i~-n6~ ~ ati s tidal -d~fin~ih~ i-e66i8~n g'h~6f the-D Iai-; an~d, WHEREAS, the 1998 subdivision request (PC Case #98-04), noted a number of drainage issues regarding surface water coming through a culvert under Bartlett, over the site, and then south and east off the site. Additional water generated from the proposed development will caase an .......... Jncrease_An_storm~ater as it drains Ii'om the p_ro~perty. The City Engineer's report dated-August 1, 2002, details the project's grading and drainage issues; and, WHEREAS, formal comments from Hennepin County Transportation Department are provided in a June 13, 2002 letter and include recommendations on a shared driveway and easements for a bike trail; and, WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed the applications and have recommended approval of the minor subdivision with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application at its August 5,_2002 meeting and has recommended approval per the conditions noted in the July 31, 2002 Planning Report. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby: A. Approve the minor subdivision as requested by the applicant with the following conditions: 1. All conditions as noted in the City Engineer's report. 2. All conditions as noted in the Hennepin County Transportation Department letter of June 13, 2002. 3. Payment of park dedication fees of $1,100.00 at the time of building permit issuance. 4. The driveway width not be more than 24 feet as measured at the right-of-way. B. The minor subdivision is approved for the following legally described property included on Exhibit "A". 2 -3116- ....... , , .- . ::. v' ' . ' RE:COLUTION NO, 02-86 EXHIBIT A "" Shore~ and ~he ~ line o[ ~e we~r ~, ........ deso~bed; ~nce South of 1~0.00 feet to ~e point of be~nnJng of the line degrees IQ m~utes 06 $~coudt Fe~t a distance of 1~.64 feet to ~e vest line of said Gover~ent ~t 5 cud ~e~ termiuating. Subject to all easemeuC* of record, Proposed Property Descriptions: parcel A That part of the property described as follow~: '' . t of that mart of Government Lot t5 I. wing south of State · That part of the wc~.t 150 qO Ye, e_ tr-'st~d ~tcv, Lake ginnetonka, Scott.an HighwmO' No. IlO an_? t_un?t?g_~'v.t'~'o"'~rjn' 'n'~;6herly of the foUowln~ ,.~er,.fa. 5~n_e_.'__, on · g a~the northwest corner ~f llollin~ Shore~, according to P file or of ieee'rd In fa~e ol~loe of the Register of DeedS, llennepin ~'oun{Y, Minnesota; thenc~ southerly on ~ assumed bearlnK of South along the west line ~1' maid Rollltlg Shores and the east line of the vest 150.00 feet of maid Governr~ent'Lot 1~o a dietanee of 170.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line here degrees 1~ minutes OG seconde Wes~ a dlmlance of 155.84 feet to the ~te$t line of maid Governtnent Lot S and tl~ere lerlnlnatlng. Which 11~$ easterly of a line drawn 75.00. f.eet westerly of and..paralle, l with the easterly line t~ereof. ' *' ' ' Parcel B That part of the property described as follows: That part of the vest I50.00 feet of that part of Government *Lot 5 Oqng south of State tltKhway No. 110 and running to ~al. ted Bm}; Lak~ Minnetonka, KeoUon 29, Town~hlp · .IIY N~, Range 94 Weal and al~ ~ nor~er~ of ~e foHowi~ des~ibed line: Commencl~ et the nOt. west. co. er of Rolling 8hore~, according to ~e plat ~ereof on Hie or of reco~ ~ ~e office of the Register of Deeds. Henne?ln Count. Minnesota; thence mou~er~r on an a~ed bearing of Sou~ aio~ the We~t H~e of smd Rolli~g ~hores and ~e esot line ~f the we~ 150.00 .feel of said gov~l ~l 6, a dis~ce of 1~0.00 feet lo ~e polng of beginning of ~e line herein demcrJbed; ~enoe Sou~ 79 degr~ IQ ~nutes D8 ~econds West ~ distance of 15~.~4 feet .to ~e we~t line of paid governmenl ~t fl and ~e termlneUng. Which ]ie$ westo~ ~f.a l~ne dra~ 75.00 feet wester~ of and pa~H~]. ~t~ t~e e~ster]y Hne ~ereo~ ~* EXHIBIT B DATE: August I7.'2002 TO: Sarah Smith, Cornrnt~nity Development Director FROM: John Cameron, City Engineer SUBJECT: City of Mound Pastuck Minor Subdivision Bartlett Boulevard Case//02-12 MFRA #13770 A.s requested, we reviewed the Pastuck Minor Subdivision request and have the following comments and recommendations. Gellerct[ ., This parcel was created by a minor subdivision approved in 1998 by kesoltmon #98-44. There is a long history on this property, including other subdivisions and applications, wi'rich will be covered in the planning report. Grading and Drai.age This property lies in the drainage l)ath fi'om a culvert under Bartlett Boulevard (Hennepin County Road 110). The old existing driveway on Parcel B acts as a dike probably because the existing culvert has filled with sediment and appears to be totally blocked. The drainage from the County Road and this parcel has been a problem for the neighbor to the south (6370 Bay Ridge Road) for many years. -3118- Ms. Sarah Smith August 1, 2002 Page 2 The applicant has proposed to extend tile storrn sewer in Bay Ridge Road to the southeast corner of Parcel B, which in concept is what needs to be done; however, final drainage calculations are necessary and final plans will need to be developed as a condition of any approval. This proposed storm sewer may need to be extended across the old driveway or connected to the existing culvert to ensure that the County Road drainage is captured. Additional 'drainage and utility easements will s~r-ely be'necegsary once the final plans are developed: This storm sewer system will need to be installed to City standards by the Developer at his expense and turned over to the City upon comp!etinn Al! ea~,~,~,~_ ,,t_~ necessary frcn'n the two parcels between subject property and Bay Ridge Road must be acquired by the Developer. The survey submitted with the application shows only tentative house locations and proposed elevafions~- The~roposed-grades shown .eor4he_dl:ivew-a_ys-are_no-t acceptable: in partic~larP~arcel A w,,u,, ~,,u,vat~ a _.I pcrccnt-g-i:ade fi'om4b'~ edge of4he bit:m:fi~ous_tcdh~a2n_front of the -ghi'-a~i" The g/-~D'6~'il~ Cli:igewh~' 6i-VP~,i:~IB ai~peai's-t~"be 17'percent: This plan needs to-be revised to lower the driveway grades closer to 15 percent and also provide some kind of landing area at the edge of the County Road. The revised grading plan must also show invert elevations for both existing and proposed culverts. An additional culvert ma5, be required fbi' the driveway to Parcel B. The drainage swale on the lot line between the two homes must be more defined to keep tile County Road runoffwithin the easement area. The proposed grading fbr tile house on Parcel A in particular, does not provide for any sort_gflevel rear yard. The contours indicate a 3 to I slope starting almost immediately at the rear walkout. This entire site will be a very difficult one to grade; therefbre, more thought must be given to both the appropriate house design and how the grades can be adjusted to work properly. Utilities It appears that all easement was never provided tbr tile private sanitary sewer forcemain located in the old driveway, that serves the home at 6380 Bay Ridge Road. This forcemain will need to be relocated and easements provided. A new sanitary sewer service will need ~o be installed for Parcel B since the previously mentioned force main is connected to the existing service stub. We have reviewed tile City's recorcl plans and can not find any record of existing water services to this property; therefore new water services will need to be installed for both parcels. Pe~w~its Tile applicant will need to obtain tile following i,ermits: 1. Hennepin County entrance permit roi' the common driveway. 2. Hennepin County utility permi! for the sanitary sewer and water service connections. 3. Storm Water Management permit fi'om tile Minnehaha Creek \,Vatershed District (MCWD) or the City of Mound it' tile permitting authority has been transferred to the City. -31-1'9- Ms. Sarah Smith August 1, 2002 Page 3 Recommendations ~,Ve recommend the following conditions become a part of any subdivision approval. 1.. Final grading and drainage plans must be revised and approved by the City Engineer prior to release of documents for recording. 2. Final storm sewer plans, including all necessary drainage calculations, must meet approval of the City Engineer. ' '.,. 3. Provide drainage and utility easements which accommodate all drainage swales and new storrn sewer construction. These easements must meet approval of the City Engineer. .... ~ 4 Dedicate additional 7 feet of permanent right-of-way for a total of 40 feet from center line of . - C'nuntv Road 110. Provide 10 feet trail ease~eyoTrd-tl-re-q0?ootfo.adw.a?-eas~em~.n.t. · ~ ,_ .7..,- ' ' ..,:,:~ ~hcl~i~q~-2h~~a~'i~Wwa~er se, wceswre~-oc~_~-~on~..stmg ..... 5: lne necessary uu,,ty-~,.,,,.,, = : _C_.2T7.-22.~ .... ;... t~¥~;i~a~ '- - ain alld tile llew storm se\¥er IllLISt De COlnl)~Ctcu IJ, "-' ..... _ .. force m ...... :~ ,,,.,,rantee m-ovided such as cash escrow, a letter ot'cred~t or /' sorne type ol ill'ltmt.;~t~ ~su~, " performance bond. 6. All necessary permits must be obtained by the applicant, including but not limited to Hennepin County access and utility permits and storm water management permit. cc: 'Loren Gordon, Hie. G! -3120- ' J BUILDING PERMIT CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound,.MN 55364 Phone: 952-472-0600 Fax: 952-472-0620 ,. EXHIBIT C CITY OF: MOUND Site Name Owner Name Contractor ..................... Address Legal Description Addition Address Tenant/Building Name The applicant is: ~ owner 6375 BARTLETT BLVD JOHN PASTUCK X contractor tenant Address 20345 EXCELSIOR. BI,VD: sHOREI;O0D, ..... (Other) SAME (NATURARLH~iMES) (OtheD Lot PART OF GOVT LOT 5 Block PID# PENDIN__~G 23-117-24-32-X×XX Plat MN 612-242-6212 DESCRIPTION OF WORK SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONDITIONS SEE ENGINEER'S REPORT ATTACHED - CAI, L FOR ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONSI CERT OF OCCUPANCY REQUIRED; SEE DECK FOOTING NOTES ESTIMATED VALUE $ /~/ ZONING DISTRICT: R1 RIA R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 NOTICE: Separate permits are required for electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation or air conditioning. This permit becomes n.ull and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work is commenced. All exterior work must be completed within one (1) year from--the date of permit issuance, according to City Code Section 300:10, Subd. 5. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and city ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. 3ERMIT FEE (BASE) .............. $ PLAN CHECK FEE ............. $ SURCHARGE ........................ 5'0 DRAINTILE ........................... $ ' S.A.C. (99%) ......................... $ S.A.C. (1%) ........................... $. CITY SEWER CONNECTION ...$ CITY WATER CONNECTION ...$ WATER METER ..................... $ WATER TRUNK CHARGE ....... $ 101-32210 101-34104 101-20800 101-32230 602-21825 602-37250 602-37259 601-37190 601-37144 601-37195 Approved By:_ Applicant's Signature: White-Finance Copy Canary-Inspector's Copy Pink-File Copy D at e c'~~'//- Date Gold-Applicant's Receipt 18029 -3121 - DAT~E:_J ULY 31_? 2003 TO: MATT SIMONEAU, BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: XXXX BARTLETT BLVD. - PASTUCK PROPERTY SURVEY REVIEW MFRA File No.8901 As requested, we have reviewed the survey submitted with the building permit application for subject property and have the following comments: 1. Need silt fence along the east property line, the southerly limits of the house construction and the south end of the lot to protect the Sandoval property. 2. Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Services: A. The existing forcemain from the Stone property needs to be relocated along the west property line of this parcel, probably on the east side of the proposed storm sewer and connected to the manhole in County Rd.110. B. The sewer service for this parcel can be connected to the existing service stub that the forcemain is being disconnected from. C. A new water service will need to be installed, as shown on the survey; however it should be moved to the east, so it doesn't end up in front of the garage. D. Utility permits will need to be obtained from ttennepin County. 3. All the Storm Sewer must be installed as part of this house construction, including the portion through the Sandoval property to Bay Ridge Road. This storm sewer construction also requires a permit from Hennepin County. 4. The Hennepin County Entrance Permit requires a small turnaround for each of the two parcels, so cars can drive out of the property and not have to back into the County Road CC: Jill Norlander Sarah Smith 15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 JCAMERON~}MFRA.COM (763}'476-6010 FAX (763) 476-8532 -3122- . ..... -._. , CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FROM GENE AND BRENDA PEDER~ON TO ALLOW ROOI~LiNE ALI~.~ATioN,.~ AN[,1 ~lO~.ivil-~$ ON EXISTING DETACHED GARAGE LOCATED AT 6033 RIDGEWOOD ROAD PURSUANT TO CITY CODE CHAPTER 350.$0S (BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJ_US?MENTS~) ............ PID NO~ 23~'1'17-24-34-0001 WHEREAS, the property owners, Gene and Brenda Pederson, submitted a building permit application on August 12, 2004 to modify the existing roofline and add two (2) dormers to an existing detached garage located at 6033 Ridgewood Road; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires an eight (8) foot front setback for side loaded garages which are located on lakeside lots; and WHEREAS, the existing garage is currently nonconforming due a deficient front setback of six (6) feet; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Chapter 350:440, nonconforming principal and accessory structures may be added, enlarged, or modified or conforming structures could be added provided the use of the parcel is conforming to district regulations and provided the expansion, enlargement, or modification meets the current zoning ordinance regulations and no other nonconformities are created; and WHEREAS, amendments were made to Minnesota Statutes Section 457.462 as part of the 2004 legislative session which now allows an entity with a nonconforming property to make improvements but not to expand unless authorized by the municipality; and WHEREAS, the building permit application has been forwarded to the Board of Appeals and Adjustment pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:505 as the property owners are requesting that the roofline alterations be considered an improvement; and WHEREAS, as set forth in City Code Chapter 350.510, the Board of Appeals and Adjustment is the City Council; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 350.510 requires review of all appeals by the Planning Commission prior to review by the City Council; and WHEREA~, the building permit application was considered by the Planning Commission at its October 4, 2004 meeting; and WHEREAS, the application was reviewed by the City Council at its October 12, - 2004 rneeting and discussion t001~ place that the roofline modificationdoes not expan-cl the nonconforming setback condition-and-approved~ssaan~e of the building permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve issuance of the building permit apPlication from Gene .__a_nd B~nda~ P~__o_a_!!_~.w__ ro0_fJine ~odifi_c_afi_on._s__~__nd_ ~__d~.~o_~o~_~Em. ers~ t0_.the existing detached garage located at 6033 Ridgewood Road and hereby makes the following findings of fact. _The~nonconfo rm i ng_fr-ont~setbackfor~he-existinggarageJs deemedto-bean exist ing~- on d itl o n a n d-is~otaffected- by-th e-rooflin em odifi cation. The roofline alteration is hereby deemed to be an improvement and is not an expansion of the nonconforming condition as the current setback is being maintained. The use of the detached garage is primarily intended for storage and does not include habitable space. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember and The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October 2004 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -3124- NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSSESSMENT Mound, Minnesota, October 1, 2004. To Whom It May Concern: ........... Notice' is-hereby given tha~t-th~City Courrcil will-meet at 7:30 p.m. on October ~mly-Haql; ....... 5344_M.a?.ood ~oad, to nnnnid~_r nnri nnnnihlv ndnnf fha_ nrnnnnnd nnn~nnmc~nf ngninnt nh, dfinn properties for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. Adoption by the Oity Oouncil of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following is the area proposed to be assessed: Bayridge Road ....... Halstead-L~ne Westwood Circle Beachwood Road Granger Lane Sinclair Road Westedge Blvd West to End Bay-Ridge-Rea~to Bn~tlett~,lvd ~ Westedge Blvd to End Westedge Blvd to Rosewood Lane Beachwood Road North to End Westedge Blvd. to East End ..................... Pfi~t-L~n~ ........... RidgbwObdR6~d'-'t~O'~h-E~d ............................ AspenRoad Clover%ircle-E~ast-to-Eqqd Rii[cFe'~t~o~d- syba~0re E~ne' ~b Diam6~d L. an~ Diamond Lane Gumwood Road Langdon Lane Langdon Lane Lafayette Lane Jones Lane Baywood Shores Dr Baywood Lane Hiilcrest Road to Gumwood Road Diamond Lane to Langdon Lane Gumwood Road to Lynwood Blvd Lynwood Blvd to South End Three Points Blvd to Jones Lane Three Points Blvd to Lafayette. Lane Three Points Blvd West to End Three Points Blvd to Baywood Shores Dri Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2005, and will bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31,2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of Mound the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is 6 percent per year. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $ 581,389.70. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the municipal clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. -3125- If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure will be followed: 1. The City will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified, the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated with --_. - eachwitness-untit-neither side~s~f~ues~ions. After the City has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the City's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses. 3. The objector may be represented by counsel. 4. Minnesota rUleS of evidenCe will nOt be StriCtly apPlied; hOweVer, they may be COnsidered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or testimony presented to the Council At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to the Council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at this point. 7. The Council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statute 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. Under Minnesota Statutes 435.193 to 435.195, the Council may, at its discretion, defer the payment of this special assessment for nay homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. When deferment of the special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all amounts accumulated plus applicable interest become due. Any assessed property owner meeting the requirements of this law and Resolution No. 89-77 adopted under it may, within 30 days of the confirmation of the assessment, apply to the City Clerk for the prescribed form for such deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property Bonnie Ritter City Clerk Published in The Laker October 9, 2004. -3126- -3127- October 20.2004 Jeffrey & Marilyn Skelton 1770 Baywood Shores Dr. Mound, MN 55364 r,u #13-I 17-24-22-0055 We are objecting to the proposed assessment for the following reason. At the meeting that was held on December 9, 2003 1 was told by the City Engineer, John Cameron and it was confirmed by the council and Mayor that we would not be assessed for this out lot. Any street improvement that has occurred in front of this lot is not to our benefit, as we have no sewer, water or building rights on this property. PID #13-117-24,21-0067 We are questioning the amount of the proposed assessment for the following reasons. All of the work to this street with the exception of a small amount of curb repair was done to replace the water main and storm water drainage. The large sections of curb replacement, street excavation, apron removal and replacement were done as a result of the water main and storm drain work. At the meeting on December 9, 2003 we were told to expect an assessment of about $1-;,'~ for the resurfacing of our street. Although much work has been done on Baywood Shores Dr. no street resurfacing has been completed as of this date. My wife and I moved into our home in November of 1987 and this is the third time the curb in front of our home has been replaced. I spoke with John Cameron on October 18th and he informed me that Baywood Shores Dr is to be built to a 4-ton roadl with approximately four inches of asphalt material. The asphalt is to be installed as a base material of 1-1/2" to 2" and a wear coat of 1-1/2" - 2". I was home the day that Valley Paving put down the base coat and observed that the base material was laid in at 3,4" to 1-1/2". Also in most areas of this street in order to meet a 4" total thickness they will be paving over the gutter portion of the curb. This road is not built to support the load of 4 - ton. Respectfully, -3128- Engineering · Planning * Surveying Mound 2004 Street Project Sept. l,2004 valley Paving Comply ~1~ me bitumin0~ b~e Course on Bayw°°d sh°res Drive this morning. While working in front of house No,1770, the homeowner came out taking pictures and complaining to a couple track drivers that were standing by the paving machi_n_e About how thin ~he blacktop looked._He came up to me and asked me how thick ........... the___ black-top wasmtpposedlo2>e. J~toldhim it was.3~-ld2E~emmaexiiately-pul-ted--out-his tape and started measuring the edge of the existing blacktop at the centgr of the road that we are matching with the first layer of blacktop. I explained that there is 2" of base course, and next year the entire street will be overlayed with 1-1/2" of bituminous wear course. He said I am not paying any assessment on a street that thir~ everybody knows a street should be 4". He also stated that the paving crew was laughing at how thin the blacktop being ir¢~ talled was. I tried to explain to him that he was talking to truck drivers who have no knowledge of the stree4 section or design. He then measured misc. areas ...................... atorrg'the curb-and stated that'the~:e 'a~'e'as Were' ~vroag also. I tried to explain to him that "': ................ the contractor has allowable tolerances in the specifications as to thickness ofblac~op, that the final layer is ¼" above the curb, and that not 100% of the project can be exactly on 3-1/2". I tried to show him that most other areas were 3-1/2" and over 3-1/2", but he seemed to have his mind made up that everything was designed wrong and being i~;talled wrong. He went on about why the curb boxes were not replaced during watermain replacement, who decided to do only one half of the street, why the sewer was not done at the same time, and.again stated that the 3-1/2" blacktop is too thin, and he is not paying any assessment for this street. I told him that the project is being done as. directed by the City of Mound, and that if[ sho~d contact the City Engineer or the Public Works Director if he has issues with the de, sign of the project. It should be noted' that the Bituminous tonnage installed on Baywood Shores Drive was 18 Tons over the computed tonnage for this street. 9LSt'ON -3129- uu~;~ ~008 15050 23rd Avenue North '"- Plymouth, Minnesota o 55447 phone 763/476-6010 . fax 763/476-8532 ¢-mail: mfra@mfra, com 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 CITY OF MOUND PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 Subject: 1770 Baywood Shores Kandis: You have already seen TOms letter about the blacktop for Baywood Shores. My discussions with the home owner were about the same on the blacktop issues. I did have a discussion about the sewer line repairs and water main and shut-offs. The home owner said that we should have replaced the sewer pipe. I told him that we relined the pipe. He stated that it is cheaper to replace the pipe cause we had the road dug up. I explained to him that we received a better price for lining the pipe and that this was just has efficient. He told me that this was not right. I ask him what experience he has in this area. He said that he lays pvc pipe for Center Point. I told him that this is sewer pipe not gas pipe. He also was having a problem about us not replacing all of the standpipes here when we have been doing it on the other streets of the project. I told him that this was not the case. We replace the standpipes that were bad and not all of them. Not matter what I explained to him, I feel that he was not happy with my explanations. He said that he was getting cheated by the city for the amount of his assessment. Greg Skinner Public Works Superintendent _printed on recycled paper 3130- Engineering ' Planning " Surveying October 21, 2004 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364-1627 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2004 Street Reconstruction Project Final Assessment Roll MFRA #14615 Dear Mayor and Council Members: Attached is a REVISED Assessment Roll for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. The project is now 99 percent done; therefore we have a total construction cost for the project, which is less than we used in preparing the Preliminary Assessment Roll. The amount to be assessed has been calculated as follows: Project Cost Total Construction Cost Engineering, Staking Inspection, and Assessment Roll Preparation Legal, Fiscal and Administration Cost Total Project Cost Less Utility Improvements (Deduct) Total Project Cost to be assessed and/or paid by the City Total $1,060,677.00 $ 288,953.00 $ 46,576.00 $1,396,206.00 $(652,448.00) $ 743,758.00 The cost of improvements to the City's utilities, including street repairs necessitated by the utility work, have been deducted from the project cost and will be paid from the respective utility fund. Mill and Bituminous Overlay Section Total Cost of Improvements = City Share = $152,361.00 x 1/3 = Homeowner Share = $152,361.00 x 2/3 = $ 152,361.00 $ 50,787.00 $ 101,574.00 Cost per Unit to be Assessed $101,574.00 + 75-1/2 units = $ 1,345.35 per unit 15050 23rd Avenue North · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 e-maih mfra@mfra, com -3131 - Honorable Mayor and City Council Members October 21, 2004 Page 2 Section with new Concrete Curb, Street Reconstruction, Street Repairs, and Bituminous Overlay Total Cost of Improvements $ 591,397.00 Less Curb and Gutter Cost (assessed separately) $ 130,432.77 Cost to be Assessed by the unit and/or paid by the City $ 460,964.23 Cost of Curb and Gutter per Lineal Foot (L.F.) to be Assessed $130,432.77 + 11,148.1 LF = $ ll.70/L.F. Remaining Cost to be Assessed City Share = $460,964.23 x 1/3 = Homeowners Share = $460,964.23 x 2/3 = $ 153,654.74 $ 3O7,309.49 Cost Per Unit to be Assessed $307,309.49 + 103.75 units = 2,962.00 per unit The Feasibility Report prepared in November of 2003 estimated the cost per unit in the Mill and Overlay Section at $1,465.00 per unit. The final number has come in at $1,345.35 per unit. A large amount of the extra work on these streets will be paid from the watermain and storm sewer funds. The section of the project where the streets were reconstructed with new concrete curb and gutter, repairs and a bituminous overlay was estimated to cost $2,582.00 per unit. A number of these streets required more repair work than was anticipated, increasing the unit charge to $2,962.00. The cost for the concrete curb and gutter at $11.70/LF is less then the estimated cost of $12.87/LF contained in the Feasibility Report. The Feasibility Report indicated a typical assessment for a 100 foot wide lot would be approximately $3,869.00. The Final Assessment Roll attached shows this same 100 foot lot would be assessed for $4,132.00. Any extra street work necessitated by the utility replacement or repairs will be paid for by the respective utility funds. If you have any questions or need additional information on anything in the assessment roll, please contact us. Sincerely, MFRA John Cameron, City Engineer JC:rth Enclosure s :h'nai n :'u-nou 14615\corres'anayor &council 110-21 -3132- ~ ' . ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ~.~ ,.: ~~ ~: ,~~~ ~ ~'o . ~ ~ t[~< · ! · -' ' 0 OOlO00 O0 OO ~0 ~ooo§°§°~°~~°go,o § oo~ooo oo oo oo &b,&,o,6&&&&& o oo ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' , [ C m 0000 0 0 O000000JO000000000000 00000000~00 0 0000000000000000000000000 0 ~' Z , 0 0 0 0 -3133- 0 0 0 ~<~ -3134- r~ o o 0 0 0 0 0 -3135- =o-, ~o · 'm © -3136- -3137- -3138- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT - LEVY #16151 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: .... 1, ..Su__.c.h proposed ass_essment, a.._copy of wh_i.ch is _attached here_to a_n_d made a pa~ hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2005, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -3139- CITY OF MOUND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet on Tuesday, October 26, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall to hear, consider and pass on all written and oral objections, if any, to the proposed assessment on the following parcels of land for: 2004 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE PID Number 13-117-24-33-0083 14-117-24-44-0001 14-117-24-44-0004 13-117-24-33-0004 13-117-24-33-0005 13-117-24-33-0014 13-117-24-33-0086 14-117-24-44-0036 14-117-24-44-0037 14-117-24-44-0038 14-117-24-44-0039 Amount 35.55 51.70 130.33 33.13 134.14 26.19 187.90 108.23 45.25 17.45 79.17 You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor (November 26, 2004) pay the entire assessment on such-property to the City. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. Bonnie Ritter City Clerk Published in The Laker the 9th day of October, 2004. 73140- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04-__ RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2004 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST LEVY #16152 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: 2004 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE FROM JULY 1,2003 TO JUNE 30, 2004. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: Such proposed special assessment, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in one annual installment as follows: LEVY # IMPROVEMENT INT. RATE YEARS 16152 2004 CBD Parking Maintenance'- 6% PID Number Amount 13-117-24-33-0083 14-117-24-44-0001 14-117-24-44-0004 13-117-24-33-0004 13-117-24-33-0005 13-117-24-33-0014 13-117-24-33-0086 14-117-24-44-0036 14-117-24-44-0037 14-117-24-44-0038 14-117-24-44-0039 $ 35.55 51.70 130.33 33.13 134.14 26.19 187.90 108.23 45.25 17.45 79.17 1 -:-. -3141- ,ut , ,, ,, Iii L I, Resolution No. 04- Payment in full with no interest charges may be made within thirty (30) days (November 26, 2004) from the date the City Council adopts the assessment roll. Payments should be made to the City Treasurer at the Mound City Hall. Partial prepayment of the assessment has been authorized by ordinance (Section 370). If you wish to make a partial payment, the payment must be in $100.00 increments. If the total assessment is under $300.00, no partial payment will be accepted. If the assessment is not paid on or before November 26, 2004, the amount will be spread over the assessment period (1 year). That payment will include interest for fourteen (14) months (November through December of 2004, and all of 2005). Payments will become due with your real estate taxes. All payments thereafter shall be in accordance with the provisions of M.S. 429.061, Subd. 3. The rate of interest to be accrued if the assessment is not prepaid within the required time period is six percent (6%). The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists for the County, and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -3142- - October 5, 2004 CITY OF MOUND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet on Tuesday, October 26, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall to hear, consider and pass on all written and oral objections, if any, to the proposed assessment on the following parcel, for the reason stated: PID Number Amount Reason 30-117-23-22-0052 $6,653.59 Nuisance Abatement per Council Resolution 03-74 Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2005, and will bear interest at the rate of 6 percent (6%) per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31, 2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of Mound the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made be~fore November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is 6% per year. The proposed assessment is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. Written or oral objections will be considered at the hearing, but the Council may consider any objections to the amount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk of the City within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the District Court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment as to the specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has either filed a signed written objection to that assessment with the City Clerk prior to the hearing or has presented the written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing. Bonnie Ritter City Clerk Published in The Laker October 9, 2004. - 31437- -- 0o ~ ~ m ~z ~~m m z m~ ~r ~ -- _--~ mm~ z ~ m ~0 zz~ ~ Z ~,~ 0 ~ Z ~ · o z mm 'i ~0~ ZZ ~ m ~ : m m o mm ~ ~ m i mm ~ Z rtl C:: ITl -3144- - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 04- RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT AND CERTIFYING TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST LEVY #16153 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following improvements, to-wit: Nuisance Abatement at 4717 Island View Drive PID #30-117-23-22-0052 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: Such proposed special assessment is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in one annual installment as follows: LEVY # IMPROVEMENT INT. RATE YEARS 16153 Nuisance Abatement 6% 10 PID Number Amount 30-117-23-22-0052 $6,653.59 Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 10 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2005, and shall, bear interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31,2005. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such 1 -3145- Resolution No. 04- payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. o The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified copy of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of October, 2004. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 2 -3146- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYVVOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEE~: www. cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: POSAC Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent October 6, 2004 2128 Centerview Lane Staff received the attached letter requesting a change of status of the commons in order to add another dock in front of the property. Apparently in the 1970's, the city conducted a study of the commons areas for a Use Plan. Since the former owner wasn't using this particular dock site and had no problem with its removal at that time, the site was removed for non-use and the area designated as a wild life preserve. . _ Staff has no problem with re-establishing this dock site, however it should be noted that this is a low water site, and there could be limited boat access during low water levels. .t ,. . II Lt. October 4, 2004 TO: Parks and Open Space Advisory Commission Docks and Commons Advisory COmmission Mound City Council Mound City Manager RE: 2128 Centerview Lane I am writing to you to request a change of status of the commons in front of my property located at 2128 Centerview Lane. According to the city's records, the commons is classified as wild life preserve Type E. I would like to request a re-classification of this commons from marker point 22180 to approximately 200 feet west to comer of cove to Type D to allow the addition of one dock in front of my property at 2128 Centerview. Sincerely, 2128 Centerview Lane Mound, MN 55364 -3148- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOU ND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: DCAC Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent October 6, 2004 2004 Rip-rap Proposals The following proposals were received for rip-rapping 700 lnft of Waterbank and 164 lnft of Idlewood. Staffwill be forwarding the proposals to Council for final approval following DCAC review. Staff's recommendation is that all of Waterbank be rip-rapped in 2004 and that Idlewood be rip-rapped in 2005. Concept Landscaping: Cost per Lnft: $69.00 Idlewood: $11,316.00 Waterbank: $48,300.00 $58,616.00 Dock&Lin: Cost per Lnft: $70.00 Idlewood and Waterbank: $60,480.00 Minnetonka Portable Dredge: Cost per Lnft: $90.00 Idlewood: $14,760.00 Waterbank: $63,000.00 $77,760.00 P12 {~_31'49_¢od~°r Concept Landscaping 31.~ l~rtest Lnne, Mouml, M3I ~364 472-4118 Proposal CiV/oflvlound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Att. lira Faclder 9/22/2004 Install 6" to 24" Fieldstone Boulder Rip-Rap along the following shoreline: Includes DNR approved filter fabric---3601 B filter rock class 4 boulders-quarried fieldstone. includes ali bonding and permitting. A) Idlewood $69 per fh 164 haft $11,316.00 B) Waterbank $69 per fh 700 In ft $48,300.00 Note: Lineal footage may change to meet budget. If so the above would be $69 per ft. times lineal footage desired. We propose hereby to furnish all material and labor--complete in accordance to the above specifications, for the sum of: ........... $ ~ee above ' balance day of completion each pha~e---deviations from the above specifi~'atioas shall become an extra cost over and above the original estimme. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and other necessary insurance. Our workers are covered by workers compensation insurance. note: This proposal may be Odthdrawn with in 10 days Acceptance of Proposal--The above prices, specifications and conditions are safi~qfactory and are hereby accept~l. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above: aecep~m Si~mature -3150- Concept Landscaping 472-4118 Proposal Bonded Shoreline Come.tot #019008644 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Att. Jim Fackler 9/22/2004 Install 6" to 24" Fieldstone Boulder Rip-Pap along the following shoreline: Includes DNR approved filter fabricm3601 B filter rock class 4 boulders-quarried fieldstone. Includes all bonding and permitting. 3.) Idlewood $69 peril. 164 Init $11,316.00 B) Watelbank $69 per fL 7001n ft $48,300.00 Note: Lineal footage may change to meet budgei. If so the above would be $69 per iL times lineal footage desired. We propose hereby to furnish all material and labor--complete in accordance to the above specifications, for the ~ma of: .S_see above. balance day of completion each phase--deviations from thc above specifieaiions shall become an extra cost over and above the origizml estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and other ne~:essary insurance, Our workers are ~overed by workers compensation insurance. Authorized Signature note: This proposal may be withdrawn with in 10 days Acceptance of Proposal--The above prices, specifi~fions and conditions are sa6sfactory and are hereby ~ed. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above: acceptance ..... Signature -3151 - DOCK & LIFT, INC. Tim & Mike Latterner 4550 Shoreline Drive Spring Park, MN 55384 Phone: 952/471-8343 or 952t474-7934 RIP-RAP ESTIMATE 0 C T 0 1 ICustomer Name IC, ustomer Aclaress I !City of Mound ATTN: Jim Fackler ~5341 Maywood Road Customer Phone ICustomer City, State & ZIP ~Date 952/472-0611 ~Mound, MN 55364 ~ 9/30/2004 Description Quantity Price Extension We will furnish all equipment, labor and materials to place approximately 864 feet of rip-rap, to be measured upon 864 70.00 60,480.00 completion. We will provide any necessary permits. The Rip Rap is 164 lineal feet'at Idlewood and 700 lineal feet at Waterbank Thank you for the opportunity to give you a bid on this project. If you have any questions or concerns, please ,~ give us a call. Grand Total $60,480.00 - -3152- Jim Fackler Parks Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364-1687 BLI[ & Tom Niccum 500 West Lake Street Excelsior MN 55331 952-474-9454 952-474-671 2 fax RE: 2004 Proposed Rip-Rapping A) Idlewood Approximately 164' ofriprap ~ $90.O0/foot ............ $14,760.00 B) Waterbank Approximately 700' ofriprap ~ $90.00/foot ............ $63,000.00 All work to be as specified per City of Mound 2004 Proposed Rip-Rapping plan dated September 17, 2004. Tom Niccum Minnetonka Portable Dredging -3153- Page I of 4 From; To: Sent: Subject: "Leah Weycker" <weyckerl(~westonka.k12.mn. us> "Leah Weycker" <weycker @westonka.kl 2.mn.us> Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:20 PM WHCC 10/27 Westonka Healthy Community Collaborahve Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:00-1:30 PM Gillespie Center 2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound Any comments or questions, contact Leah We¥ckcr, Collaborative Coordinator, at 952-491-8058 or WeyckerL~,westonka.kl2,mn_us 1. Lunch 12:00 Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a light "free will donation" lunch, suggested value $6.00. 2. Introductions 3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes 4. Announcements 5. Survey for evaluating the WHCC How are we doing? It always helps to evaluate how we are doing and what we can do to keep focused and successful. 6. Denise Eng, Sojourner Project October is Domestic Violence Awareness month. Denise has several years of experience working with victims of domestic violence and most recently haS'added additional services tOour community. She will talk about the issue and what we are doing about it. "ACTION is the foundational key to all success." - Pablo Picasso (1881-1973) **Advisory Group Updates** Health - Depression and Suicide Awareness Task Force Sandy Olst~ Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke -3154- 10/20/2004 Page 2 of 4 WeCAN's family advocate, Jessie Billiet, is coordinating referrals for free medical services with Mound Ridgeview Clinic. We sent a letter and report to Bob Stevens, President at Ridgeview Medical Center asking to continue the account through 2005. The program is filling the medical gap for Iow income residents that are uninsured, underinsured or in the process of applying for medical assistance. Youth Activities - Skate Park Task Force Sandy Rausehendoffer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Kathy Jones, Klm Erickson Heiar The weather has stopped us from laying anymore cement at the skate park. Thanks to Tom Zabeck for all the help with the fiat cement work around the park. Before the snow flies, we still hope to complete some grading and seeding, installation of the water fountain and mister, and electncial hook ups. 'l'he pare crew will help builfl-tlae half p~pe m the garage over the winter. We will plan a grand opening event for Spring. The AftEr Sch00!.6cti~..ity.bus ~s.~ng! .~.r.e_.~ tp smdent~.! Nothing new on the $50,000 grant for western Hennepin collaboratives to screen kids entering the juvenile justice system. Stay tuned. Parent Education Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Holly Rakocy, Amy Taggart We are discussing ways to improve the effectiveness of the parent education group. Community Margaret Holste, Carol Olson, Ginny Lozano, Jeanette Metz, Dena KuenzeI The community group will meet again in the fall. Let's schedule a meeting. Executive / Finance Kim Heiar, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer, Mary Hughes The Executive group will meet right before the October WHCC meeting. Agenda includes; how to handle new funding requests, restructuring of the parent group, budget surplus, approval for use of clinic connection line item. Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County I attended a state collaborative conference in Alexandria. The information shared was great but the state still can not tell us when the 25% reduction in our LCTS funds will take place. A good guess would be January of 2005, for implementation in FY 2005-2006. **Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Minutes - September 22, 2004** 10/20/2004 -3155- Page 3 of 4 Present: Denise Eng, Bill Erickson, Margaret Holste, Mary Hughes, Kathy Jones, Dave Kolb, Dena Kuenzel, Jim Kurtz, Laura Lundberg, Gloria Lundberg-Jorgenson, Sandy Olstad, Sandy Rauschendorfer, Amy Taggart~ JeanAnn Thayer, Jennifer Wigton, Sandy Wing, Leah Weycker, Guests: Julie Johnson, parent and Arlene Mclntyre, National Marrow Donor Program 1. Introductions and lunch Sandy Rauschendorfer chaired the meeting due to Kim Heiar needing to go to the hospital to have her baby. Congratulations Klm, Dan and baby Ellie Sue. 2. Additions or Changes to the Agenda/Minutes: Vote on financing framework for the county was added to the agenda. Mary Hughes mad~a motion fo approve ffi~-ffi~-u e-t~-an---d-//~faS- changes, Sandy Wing seconded the motion. Motion passed. 3, Announcements: Dena Kuenzel announced the Annual Memory Walk to be held on Sept. 25 from 9-3. Scarecrow event was new this year. Also a blood drive at Presbyterian Homes. Mary Hughes talked about the WeCAN sleep out for the homeless. The sleep out will take place on Nov. 18-20. Donations of gifts, groups to raise money for sleeping out, and volunteers for the evening are needed. Sandy Olstad thanked the WHCC for assisting in funding the domestic violence support group. Two doctors will be speaking at St. Johns for an older adult ministry titled Aging Well. October is Domestic Violence Awareness month. Denise Eng talked about a display that w/Il be at the Gillespie Center Oct. 11. Arlene Mclntyre talked about the importance of blood donations and marrow registration. 8211 patients were helped by local donations of blood and marrow. The marrow registration reaches 3000 searchers in need of marrow. St. John's Church is hosting a blood drive. Leah announced that the western suburbs have received a $50k juvenile justice grant from the Alliance task force for mental health screening on first time offenders. We will be involving the police departments once the details are worked out. The Alliance may be funding our community participation in the What Up? youth activity line. We can list all the events for youth in our community. The list is updated weekly. Mpls and the northern suburbs are using it now and it has been very successful. Robin Eller is working on getting the youth center/community center task force together. Leah handed out a list of project we funded in 04-05. We may see a 25% reduction in revenue due to changes in the medicaid reimbursment calculations. 4. WHCC and Alliance Priorities We worked on, but still did not finish reviewing the document of resources and needs in the community. Leah asked that changes be written -3156- 10/20/2004 Page 4 of 4 on the packet and handed in so she can finish the document. We will look at the needs at the next meeting. 5. LCTS Financing Framework Leah presented the document from the county that needs to be signed by our board chair. The LCTS Financing Framework (local collaborative time study) outlines the distribution of funds to the collaboratives in Hennepin County. Specifically, the document dictates what percentage of our locally generated funds go to the Children's Mental Health Collaborative (CIvlHC) and the Alliance. The document states that the contribution will remain at 5% for both, no change to us, from the previous policy. The only change in the document is Minneapolis's contribution which was 13 % to the CMHC and will be reduced to 5%. Leah and Carol Olson are the voting members on the LCTS policy group. Discussions that took place at ttie LCTS policy meetings, that generated this document, were discussed. The county would have liked a higher percentage to go to the CMHC but they could not come up with convincing documentation of the g~ou~ being served. School counselors at the table district Gloria agreed to help us identify ways to access the CMHC and understand how it serves our children. Currently the population served is mainly children in ISD 287, a consolidated district of suburban schools targeting children with special needs. Sandy Olstad made a motion to approve the policy, and Amy Taggart seconded the motion. Motion passe& 6. We did not get to the evaluation survey. 7. WESTONKA. ORG magnets were handed out The web site has been successful for families to access resources in our community. Sandy Olstad moved, seconded by Kathy Jones, to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed unanimously. Leah Weycker, Recorder 10/20/2004 -3157- Mediaco m Bill Jensen Regional Vice President October 19, 2004 Dear City of Mound Community Leaders: Whenever a change is made to our customers' monthly billing at Mediacom, it's important we communicate these changes in advance to both our customers as well as the communities we serve. Effective with our December billing, Mediacom will change the fee it charges for late payments, i.e.; "Late Fees", to $5.00. This change in Mediacom's billing information will be communicated to our customers via their monthly statements in November with the following me s sage: Notice of Change of Late Fee: Beginning December 1, 2004 Late Payment Fees will be $5.00 Should have any questions regarding this change, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Bill Jensen Mediacom Communications Corporation 1504 2~r~ Street SE, Waseca, Minnesota 56093 Telephone: 507-835-2356 · Fax 507-835-4567 -3158- Page 1 of 1 Kandis Hanson From: To: Sent: Attach: Subject: "Laurie Jennings" <laurie@amm145.org> "Jim Danielson" <jimd@mendota-heights.com>; "John Moir" <johnmoir@ci.minneapolis.mn.us>; "John Gunyou" <jgunyou@eminnetonka.com>; "Kandis Hanson" <kandishanson@cityofmound.com>; "Matt Fulton" <matt.fulton@newbrightonmn.gove>; "Larry Bodahl" <lbodahl@attbi.com>; "Wally Wysopal" <wwysopal@ci.north-saint-paul.mn.us>; "Susan Hoyt" <susan.hoyt@ci.northfield.mn.us>; "Eric Johnson" <eajohnson@cityofoakparkheights.com>; "Craig Waldron" <craig.waldron@ci.oakdale.mn.us>; "Ron Moorse" <rmoorse@ci.orono.mn.us>; "Osseo Administrator" <Bratten@ci.osseo.mn.us>; "Laurie Ahrens" <lahrens@ci.plymouth.mn.us>; "Frank Boyles" <fboyles@cityofpriorlake.com>; "Jim Norman" <jnorman@ci.ramsey.mn.us>; "Samantha Orduno" <sorduno@ci.richfield.mn.us>; "Marcia Glick" <mglick@ci.robbinsdale. mn. u s> Thursday, September 30, 2004 8:32 AM tpp SAMPLE RESOLUTION.doc; 2004 TPP Public Hearing Comments.doc 2030 Transportation Policy Plan TO: AMM Members FR: AMM Staff RE: 2030 Transportation Policy Plan The AMM Board of Directors has asked that all member cities be provided with a copy of AMM's comments on the public hearing draft of the Metropolitan Council's 2030 Transportation Policy Plan. Attached for your information and potential use are AMM's written comments on the plan, as well as a resolution cities can elect to use to express their support for these comments. If you have not done so already, we would encourage all cities to review the draft plan, which is available online at ~,~.._tr_o...9..~Lg..rg, and submit comments to the Council on or before the October 22 deadline. Please feel free to use, borrow from or modify AMM's comments in any way you see fit. If you have any questions about the draft plan or AMM's comments, please feel free to contact Kris Wilson or Roger Peterson at (651) 215 - 4000. - 3159- 10/1/2004 September 30, 2004 TO: FR: RE: Metropolitan Council Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 2030 Transportation Policy Plan Thank you for the opportunity to provide our comments on the public heating draft of the 2030 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is composed of 70 cities from around the seven-county metropolitan area, who share your assessment that transportation is one of the most important challenges facing our region today. After closely following your work developing the draft TPP and discussing it with our Board of Directors and member cities, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities offers the following comments for your consideration. 2030 Transportation Policy Plan Overall, the draft plan does a good a job of outlining the situation facing this region - a rapidly growing and increasingly mobile metropolitan area that is expected to add another million residents by the year 2030. The plan is equally clear and direct in recognizing that current funding sources and levels are inadequate to meet the needs of this region. Without additional funding, congestion will worsen, travel times will continue to increase and both our mobility and economic prosperity will suffer. Finally, we are encouraged by the emphasis this plan puts on transit. AMM's members are strong supporters of a multi-modal transportation system that combines highway investments with the regular route bus service and dedicated transitways required in a metropolitan region of our size. Given these areas of agreement, we would, however, like to urge the Council to make several changes to the draft plan before giving it final approval. 1) Transportation and Land Use Planning As an organization of cities, AMM and its members view this plan from a slightly different perspective than other stakeholders. To cities, this is not just another needs analysis or study of our transportation system. It is a statutorily mandated and enforceable component of our planning process. Viewed from this perspective, we have several concerns about what the plan expects of local governments and their comprehensive plans. Policy 18 states that in order for a local comprehensive plan to be in conformance with the regional transportation system, cities must plan for the forecasts allocated to them and that they must do so in a manner that does not add traffic to any already congested roads. Furthermore, it states that extensions or capacity expansions to the regional sewer system will be predicated on -3160- the state or local unit of government demonstrating that "adequate transportation improvements will be provided when needed to avoid significant negative impact" on the highway system. This is unrealistic and unachievable in most parts of the region - especially given the congested state we are already in and the lack of funding to address existing problems or future needs. For the vast majority of metropolitan cities it simply will not be possible to accommodate any additional households without adding to already congested roads. There is no reasonable way to enforce this policy without shutting down development in many parts of the region. Given the official role this document plays in our local-regional planning process, it is important that all policies contained in the transportation policy plan are realistic and equally enforceable across the region. This is not the case with the currently drafted policy #18. Secondly, the draft plan talks a lot about encouraging cities to develop higher density and mixed- use centers that are transit-oriented and pedestrian friendly. This brings with it an obligation on the Council's part to commit to providing transit service to that area for the long-term. Unfortunately, this is an obligation the Council does not appear to have the resources to meet - especially in the case of developing cities. Cities cannot be expected to develop areas geared to transit, with higher densities and fewer parking spaces, only to have that transit service significantly reduced or eliminated during the next round of budget cuts. Additionally, the draft plan uses too many ambiguous terms when referring to cities and their comprehensive plans. In some cases, its says cities "must," while in others it says cities are "expected to" or that they "should" do certain things. The plan needs to clearly identify what cities must have in their comprehensive plans in order for those plans to be found in compliance with the system plan, versus what the Council would like to see in those plans as a matter of preference. Finally, the draft plan talks extensively about "managing" traffic and "managing" congestion, but there is very little discussion or mention of "accommodating" traffic or people. This region is so far behind on its transportation infrastructure that the 30-year plan is almost entirely about meeting existing needs. There is very little in this plan to serve future growth. For example, the plan does not identify a single new principle arterial, despite the fact that numerous cities have approached the Council about roads that are already functioning as principle arterials, but lack the appropriate designation, planning or design. Furthermore, despite the Framework's projections of significant population increases for the developing cities in Dakota, Anoka and Scott Counties, the transportation policy plan fails to include any projects to serve that growth. 2) Transportation Funding The plan lacks a clear and specific proposal for funding the needs identified. Experience has shown that this region cannot afford to sit back and wait for additional funding to materialize out of the legislative process. The Metropolitan Council has an obligation to put politics aside and the needs of the metropolitan area first. We invite you to join with local governments and other stakeholders to actively propose and work for additional funding. -3161 - AMM and its members have long supported a variety of means of raising the funding necessary to build and maintain the transportation and transit system this region needs. Whether it be an increase in traditional funding sources such as the gas tax or license tab fees, or the introduction of new sources such as a metro-area sales tax or county-imposed wheelage tax, AMM and its member cities are ready and willing to work with the Council to develop and pass a multi-modal trangportation funding package that can realistically address the needs o£thls reg{on. Without the voice of our regional planning authority, it will be very difficult to overcome the partisan disagreements and special-interest battles that have left us without a permanent funding increase for 16 years. Given the Council's responsibility to plan the regional transportation system, it is most definitely your role to step into the heart of the issue and contribute to a solution on the funding issues. At a very minimum the plan should provide more specifics about what additional funding would mean on the ground. In order to make the case for additional funding, legislators and citizens need specific information about how additional money would be spent. The transportation policy plan should paint a clear and specific picture of the transportation system residents can expect in exchange for supporting higher funding levels. Summary In summary, while the draft plan makes many good points and includes important planned investments, it does not go far enough in proposing a realistic funding plan, identifying the investments necessary to support an additional million residents or providing a realistic foundation for local comprehensive planning. Thank you for the opportunity to share our concerns with you. If you have any questions or would like to discuss any of our comments in more detail, please feel free to contact Kris Wilson, interim executive director, at (651) 215 -4003. -3162- SAMPLE RESOLUTION 2030 Transportation Policy Plan Whereas, forecasts call for almost one million additional residents in the seven-county metropolitan area by the year 2030; Whereas, an effective and efficient transportation system, that includes both roads and transit, is key to the successful growth and development of our region; Whereas, congestion and mobility issues are already among the most pressing challenges facing our region; Whereas, a comprehensive and well-rounded plan for our regional transportation system requires the input of numerous stakeholders, including local governments... Now therefore be it resolved, that the City of supports the attached comments prepared by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities in regards to the draft 2030 Transportation Policy Plan and urges the Metropolitan Council to make the requested changes to the draft plan before granting it final approval. -3163- COMMUNITY LEADER UPDATE - October 2004 Information for Elected Officials and Community Leaders from your Cable Television and Broadband Services Provider INTRODUCING DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS Mediacom is making available Digital Video Recorders (DVR), a new product that enables customers to record their favorite programs with unprecedented ease and convenience. A DVR is a recording device like a VCR that records TV programs on a hard disk drive instead of a tape or compact disk. When the customer tunes to a channel, the DVR makes a temporary recording of whatever is on - providing unprecedented control over "live" TV. DVRs then allow customers to pause the program, rewind missed scenes or fast forward to live television, and skipping programming they don't want to watch. provides customers with more time saving control over their accounts, while at the same time reducing the company's operational costs. "CAPITALIZING ON RURAL AMERICA" AIRED Mediacom Communications partnered with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines to broadcast highlights of the recent symposium "Capitalizing on Rural America: A Dialogue on the Economic Future of Rural America." Highlights were shown on the Mediacom Connections Channel. President George W. Bush was the keynote speaker, while Senators Charles Grassley (R- IA) and Tom Harkin (D-IA) participated in the symposium and served as hosts. Watching saved programs from the DVR personal video library is easy. A viewer can start the program, stop it, and resume where he or she left off or restart the program from the beginning. And unlike a VCR, a program that started recording 10 minutes ago can be viewed from the beginning at any time, even while it is still recording. DVRs help fulfill Mediacom's commitment to provide our customers with cutting-edge products and services. NEW CUSTOMER ACCESS TO ACCOUNT AND BILLING INFORMATION Mediacom has begun deploying a new feature enabling customers to electronically manage their personal"- accounts with the company. This new capability allows customers to view, manage and pay their Mediacom bills online. In addition, Mediacom plans to implement a Customer Self-Care module that will soon allow customers to activate new services and manage account information online. These new electronic bill presentment/payment and other self-care tools permit our customers to conveniently interact with Mediacom. It also The event, sponsored by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines, brought together representatives of all sectors of rural America to discuss and develop new direction and policy that will have a positive impact on the future of the rural areas of our nation. Providing this symposium coverage is an example of how Mediacom uses its investment in technology t0 help communities it serves grow and prosper. It is part of our continuing commitment to provide quality programming and connect with our viewers in the communities we serve. THE LITTLE CABLER THAT COULD Mediacom was featured in the April 19, 2004, edition of ,Multichannel News, a national cable industry trade publication. "The Little Cabler That Could: Spunky Mediacom is Doing It All m And Adding Telephone, Too" featured an in-depth profile highlighting the company's history and growth and an overview of the products and services available to it's customers in 23 states. The story also highlighted its company-wide commitment to provide local programming that connects with the community and differentiates Mediacom from satellite providers. -3164- MEDIACOM CONTACT INFORMATION Customer Service: 1-800-332-0245 Bill Jensen, Vice President of Regional Operations: 507-835-2356 Tom Bordwell, Senior Manager of Government Relations, 952-440-9680 x222 Mediacom Communications and Sprint Announce Agreement for Mediacom to Provide Telephony Services Meca'acorn Communications to offe~ voice- ~deo-data triple play to customers as Spr~t expaz~ds presence in cable telephony MIDDLETOWN, N.Y., and OVERLAND PARK, Kan. - Aug. 25, 2004 - Med~acom Commurdcatons Corporation (Nasdaq: MCCC), the e~ghth-largest cable operator ~n the United States, and Sprint (~,~SE: FON), the global integrated cotra-nu~catons provider, joLntly announced a multyear agreement enabling Mediacom Communications to provide telephony services in essentially all of its markets encompassing 2.7 million homes in 23 states. Mediacom Conanunications will use its fiber- 6ch, adv_anced digital network and its wire to the home, together with Sprint's telecommunications infrastructure and expertise, to add Voice over Intex'net Protocol (VoIP) telephone service to Med~acom's existing array of broadband products and se~Sces. Med/acom Communications anticyates launch~g telephone senfice in selected markets in the first half of 2005. '~-tis strategic alliance with Sprint will permit our Company to offer our customers a powerful bundle of broadband products in one package, on one bill, from one provider and at a lower cost," stated Mediacom's Chairman and CEO, Rocco B. Commisso. "Consumers switching to the Mediacom telephone service will be able to keep their existing phone numbers and directory listings, utilize the telephone equipment and wiring already in their homes, and receive more advanced features than traditional telephone service. With this agreement in place, we also have the opportunity to explore offering Sprint wireless phone service to our customers." Under the agreement, Sprint will assist Mediacom Communications with provisioning capabilities, switching and termination of traffic to the public switched telephone network, delivery of enhanced 911 emergency service, local number portability, and operator and directory services. Among other features, Mediacom's Voit telephone service will include caller ID with name, call waiting, call forwarding and voicemail. "The voice-video-data triple play is a winner for cable companies and for Sprint," said Howard E. Jan:zen, president - Sprint Business Solutions. "Cable operators such as Mediacom Communications can leverage Sprint's existing networks and technical knowledge to b6ng voice services to their customers without expending valuable capital. They can stay focused on delivering what their customers demand - quality communications and entertainment services -- while Sprint provides telecommunications services, including project development, network design and implementation." This agreement marks a continued expansion for Sprint into partnerships with cable providers. Sprint is leveraging its telecom assets and communications expertise to help drive this expansion and deliver telephony and wireless solutions to the cable industry. Already, Sprint has armounced agreements with large multiple system operators as well as regional cable companies to enable them to deliver reliable, robust telephony services to customers. Me~'acom Comznunicarions l~oz~v~d Looldng Stat~l~t Any statements in this press rekase that are not historical facts are formard-looking statements mithin the meaning of Section £1E of the SecuriEes Exchange ~ct of ! 934, as amendet In some cases, you mn identi~ thosefora~nt-looka'~g statements ~y words such as "may," '~'ll," "should," "e~pects," ')slans," "antidpates," '~eliems, ' "estimates," '~rediets,' '~otentia~ " or "continues" or the negative of those wvrds and other comparabk words. These formard-looka'ng statements am sue'eot to ffsks and uncertainties that could muse actual results to &)fe~ materially frvm historical results or those Mediacom Communi~a~ons anticipates. Factors that could cause actual results to &~er from those contained in the formard-looka'ng statements inc&de: competition in Mediacom Communications'existing andproposed businesses; Mediacom Communications' abi~y to aehiem an~ipated customer and revenue gromth and to succes~ul~ introduce nem produets and services; changes in la~s and regulations; blediacom Communications' abi~ to generate suffdent cash flo~v to meet its debt service obligations and the other ffsks and uncertainties described in Mediacom Communications' annual report on Form I O-K and the other reports and domments that Mediacom's fiks from ~'me to time ~th the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mediacom Commanic~'ons is ~nder no obligation to (and ~xpress~y disdm'ms a~y sush obligation to) public~ update or alter its fonvard-look~'ng statements made in this press rekase, mhether as a result of n~v information, future events or othervaise. 2 -3165- Association of Metropolitan Municipalities AMM News Page 1 of 2 October 15, 2004 Met Council Considering Significant Legislative Initiatives for 2005 The Metropolitan Council is currently considering several initiatives that would alter its scope and adjust the way it provides services within the Twin Cities region. In a brief report at the October 14 Council meeting, Chair Peter Bell outlined the following five initiatives. Chair Bell noted that all five initiatives are receiving serious consideration, but that the Governor has not yet given his final support to proceed with any o~f_f them. Making Water Supply a New Regional System. The Metropolitan Council currently undertakes water suppl'~, planning for the seven-county metropolitan area, and has review and comment authority over the water supply' ~ components of local comprehensive plans. However, if water supply were to become an official regional system, local comprehensive plans would have to be in alignment with the regional plan and the Council could require changes to local plans found to be nonconforming. At this point, it appears that the Council is considering a regional system modeled after the existing parks and open space system, where individual water utilities would continue to be owned and operated by individual communities, but the Council would be responsible for coordinating planning at a regional level and possibly funding major capital improvements of a regional naturej Eliminating Aviation as a Regional System. Chair Bell noted that aviation does not seem to fit as a regional system the way other issues do, but that he still envisions some level of collaboration between the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and the Met Council, given the land use planning and compatibility issues surrounding airports. ARCHI~VE~S Transferring the Metro HRA to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The Metro HRA currently operates the federally-funded Section 8 program for almost 100 metro cities, located in Anoka and Carver Counties, as well as large portions of suburban Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. Establishing a Voluntary Relationship with Adjacent Counties. Noting that no one can argue that the metropolitan area doesn't extend beyond the traditional seven counties, Chair Bell stated that wastewater treatment and transportation issues are the most likely candidates for collaborative efforts with the adjacent counties. Legislative action would likely be needed for any effort that involves the Council in activities or services outside the statutorily~defined metro-area. Exploring Managed Competition in Regional Services. This could include transit and/or wastewater treatment services currently provided by the Council. It is possible that all or some of these initiatives could be developed into a legislative package for 2005, after further exploration and development. AMM will be following these issues closely and scheduling a meeting for member cities to learn more, ask questions and offer comments, once the proposals have been more fully developed. In the meantime, if you have questions, comments or concerns about any of these areas, please don't hesitate to contact Kris Wilson at (651) 215 - 4003. Met Council Offices to Move In other Metropolitan Council news, planning is underway to move the Council offices from their current location http :/./www. arum 145.org/newsletter.htm - 3 '166 - 10/15/2004 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Page 2 of 2 across from Mears Park a few blocks away to a building at 390 N. Robert St. in downtown St. Paul. The Robert Street location has historically housed state agency staff, but is now being sold to the St. Paul HRA, who would remodel it for the Met Council's use under a lease-purchase agreement. At this time, the target move date for the Council is early 2006. Local Elected Official Needed for GIS Policy Board AMM is currently seeking a local elected official from an east metro city to fill an open seat on the Metro GIS Policy Board. This is a great opportunity for individuals with an interest in technology and how intergovernmental partnerships can be developed to improve local government's use and sharing of geographic information systems (GIS) technology. The policy board, which includes one commissioner from each of the seven counties, one Metropolitan Council member and two AMM appointees, meets quarterly on Wednesday evenings. Additional information about Metro GIS is available online at ~:_m__.e.~_.og~_.s__...o..rg. Individuals interested in filling the open seat should contact Kris Wilson at (651) 215 - 4003. AI~I~ News is sent periodically to all AMM city managers and administrators. The information is intended to be shared with mayors, council and staff in order to keep officials abreast of important metro city issues. © Copyright 2004 AMM 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Telephone: 651-215-4000 Fax: 651-281-1299 Email: amm@am_ m145.or.q 10/15/2004 '?.http://www.amm145.org/newsletter.htm - 31 67- DRAFT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE MINUTES 8:30 a.m., Fdday, August 13i 2004 LMCD Office, 18338 Mtka BlVd., Deephaven, MN Present: Herb Suerth, LMCD Board; Pete Nelson, LMCD Board; John 'Barren, Three Rivers Park District; Dick Osgood, Lake Uinnetonka Association (LMA); Greg Nybeok~'LMCD Executive Director. Minutes, The Task FOrce reviewed the minutes from the 6/11/04 EWM/EXotics Task Force Meeting and accepted them as submitted' .,Update of 2004 EWM Harvesting Season on .Lake Minnetonka. Suerth asked for an update on this agenda item from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that the LMcD harVesting equipment was being removed from Lake Minnetonka for the 2004 SeaSOn On 8j1704' The milfoil groWth in 2004 was relatively modest in early to mid June, primarily due to the cooler temperatures and high levels of precipitation. This changed in the latter part of June when the weather, improved and milfoil was .matting in a number of areas around Lake Minnetonka, making !t difficult for the ~re~ to keep up. The feasib I ty o~' Utilizing the used high speed transport barge was ~nvestigated into when it.was used for a couple of weeks in North Upper Lake near North Arm, Maxwell, and crystal Bays. It proved useful to the program when there were long transport times involved in this area of the Lake. This became problematic this summer when the outboard motor became inoperable. A decision will need to be made by the Board on whether to buy a new outboard motor for the used transport barge 'for the 2005 season. Additionally, them will be a need for the Board to make a decision on whether to purchase a new paddlewheel harVester for the 2005 season. A 2004 EWM Final Harvesting Report will be prepared in the near future and should be available for the October EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. Only afew calls were received frOm the public this summer on fragmentedmitfoil at .shoreline around the Lake. He entertained questions or comments from Task Fome Members. Suerth stated that he agreed there Was a need to schedule an EWM Harvesting Program Working Group Meeting this fall to disCuss the 2004 Season and.possible mProvementS for the 2005 season He asked Nybeck foi-~;his,~Pinion on hOW often he ~lieved ihe transport barge coUld be used in conjunction with the harvesting program. NYbeck stated t~at he believed the transport barge could be used on most areas of the lake'as long as there is significant transport time involved to the off-load sites, in cases where transport distances are shorter, it might make more sense to utilize a fourth harvester rather than three harVesters and the transport bargel -3168- EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE, 811311)4, PAGE 2 Suerth stated that he would like to have useof the transport b~rge for one full season prior to the Board making a decision on the feasibility of using anothef~transport barge in the future. He complimented the efforts of the crew during the 2004 season. Viewing of LMCDIFreshwater Society zebra mussel video recently taped at Twin Cities PUblic Television. Suerth stated that the LMCD and the Freshwater Society had recentlY co-prOduCe~l a zebra mussel video with Twin C t es Public Te evision, .The:LMODBoard of Directors viewed the'video at its :8111/O4 Rega'lar Meetir~g.._lLwas__vJewed_by-TaskForce-mem bers-in-attendance-at-this-meeting: .......................................... Nelson stated that he believed distribution of the video needed immediate attention, He reviewed a p!:oposed distribution list for the video. Those included on this list in~ltJded theP¢odudtionteami'the Video sponsors/distributors; the member cities, including local chambers of commerce, local sch~6isi' a~d other clubs (Rotary); local State legislators; State' and I°cai agencies; the University of Minnesota; and ~ther organizations (including the LMA and the MinneSOta Lakes AsSociation (ML~A))i::iW~'en th:iSVideOi§:' distributed, he believed that it should be accompanied by a cover letter. Additional!Y, he believed that there was a need to prepare a press release announcing that the video has been PmduCed, that it Will be aired for the first time on (8/22/04) at 7:30 p.m. on TPT channel 17, and to encourage the publ!c to watch it, He stated that.he bel eyed LMOD Chair Tom Skramstad was' wi ling to assist in the reproduction of additi°nal copies the powerpoint presentation 'CD. Osgood stated that the LMA had a Board member who might bb able, to assist in the distribution of a press release to alocal advertising company who could distribUte it tO up to 193 media outlets. Dudng the Exotics Task Foree meeting, he was preparing a draft press release that could be modified by the LMCD and sent out to the local newspapers. Nelson stated that he believed there 'were other areas relating to this Program that needed attention. These inclUded: Advertising, He indicated that he woUld be meeting with Nybeck and Jim Hi!lis on improved LMCD zebra mussel literature, and an imprOved communications Plan. Legislative Agenda- He indicated that he had discussed possible legislative changes with Senator Gen O son She has;expressed an interest in the'"BiaCk Lake/Green Lake" ConCep[ and there i~a need to further refine the.mechanics relating to this concept. H~ believed that there Was. a need.to possible have joint sP°n'sorship bn this cOncePt, possibly With '~e MIA. ~': Osgood recommended that the "Black Lake/Green Lake" concept should be discussed with Jay Rendall sometime early in the Process. Nelson continued his discussion on areas.that need attention: Education- He indicated that he had contact Don Drayer, a retired superintendent for the Minnetonka school district. Drayer has indicated that he would play the video at the local Rotary club and that he would check into whether it was feasible to get it into the local schools. He asked -3169- EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE, 8/13/04, PAGE 3 Task Force members to forward any ideas that they might have on getting this video into the loCal schools, Fundraising. He indicated that he would like to work with the lOcal Rotary and LiOns clubs to aSsist in fundraising efforts. He believed that these clubs could assist, at a minimum, in reprOduction of videos. There is a need to get started on the thought process for the introduction of legislation this upcoming session, pointing out that this will not be cheap. He believed that these clubs might be able to assist on this. The Task Force discussed on whether there was a need for a lobbyist, whether it s grassrOOts or _P. mfessipna!, ~.~here_was.d scussion_on the possibility of. Using.the_lobbyist usedby theMLA~ Gary Botzick~ Nelson continued his comments: Other or.qanizations- He indicated that he would like to work with other organizations, some of which include the MCWD, the LMA, the MLA, the MN DNR, and the Thr~ RiV~- pa~ Disiri~il- He believed that there might be a need to approach the MCWD on whether they are willing to fund aspects of this program. ..L. MCD website- He believed that there was a need to upgrade the website to include these materials and to explore the possibility of including pay pal through "Save the Lake" for fundraising purposes. The Task Force discussed this agenda item further. Some of the diScussion included: 1) the possibility of the MCWD participating in this program in the future, 2) whether it would be more appropriate for the MCWD to fund the LMCD's EWM Harvesting Program rather than the LMCD's Zebra Mussel program, 3) whether it is prudent for the MCWD to get involved in the management of milfoil and zebra mussels on Lake Minnetonka when there has been consideration to spend a significant amount of funds to improve water quality on Halsteds and Jennings Bays, 4) the concept of integrating the EWM Harvesting Program and the Zebra Mussel Program into an Exotic Species Program, 5) the concept of advocating education with the Three Rivers Park District through the video, and 6) how to proceed with the "Black Lake/Green Lake" concept and how the fishing groups might respond to this, including the need to educate and motivate them. Suerth stated that he believed there was a need to strategize for the 2005 zebra mussel inspection program and whether to continue to coordinate with the MN DNR inspection program. He expressed concern that the MN DNR was having problems covering the selected hours and public accesses as agreed to in the contract. The Task Force briefly discussed this and the consensus was that the LMCD should discuss the 2004 inspection program after it concludes in the near future. Suerth thanked the Task Force for participating in the discussion relating to this agenda item. Barren updated the Task Force on two projects. First, he was working with the LMCD's EWM Harvesting Program on the total phosphorus sampling in harvested milfoil. The last sample has been collected and the EWMIEXOTICS TASK FORCE, 8/13J04, PAGE 4 lab work should begin the near future. The results of the lab work should be finalized in the near future and a Report will be prePared summarizing the results. Second, he believed that some changes might occur, possibly as soon as 2005, with regards to the water quality sampling program on Lake Minnetonka. He stated that he would keep the LMCD and the Task Force up to date on this program. Area Wide lake association reports. There were no area wide 'lake association reports. Old business. There was no old business, New business. There Was no new business. Next EWMIExotiCs Task Force Meeting. Suerth stated that the next EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting was scheduled for Fdday, 10/13/04, Adiournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. Respectfully Submitted, Greg Nybeck Executive Director -3171 - AJ LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT (LMCD) 2004 Eurasian Waterm/Ifoil (EWM) Final Harvesting Report Harvesting season data and harvesting Condition summary: 1. Harvestin.q Season: The 2004 .season consisted of approximately nine weeks starting on Monday, JUne 14, and ending On Thursday, August 14. There were two days of harvesting Cancelled due to the July 4th holiday. The length of the season, factOring in for cancelled days, was 43 working days. This was two days longer than the 41-day season in 2003. The crew operated the four LMCD harvesters, and a used high-Speed transport barge owned by the LMCD, five days a week for eight hours during the 2004 season. 2. Water Level- Lake levels throughout the course of the 2004 season were higher than compared to 2003. The lake level on the first day of the 2004 season was 930.07' NGVD compared to 929.50' NGVD in 2003. The high? lake level during the 2004 was 930.17' On June 15th, compared to a. highest lake level of 929.64 NGVD on July 3rd during the 2003 season. In 2004, lake levels remained relatively high for a good portion of the harvesting season. Although the lake levels in 2004 were higher than 2003, milfoil growth was heavier and there were more areas of Lake Minnetonka that .had matted areas, especially from late June through the end of the season. 3. Acres Harvested- Total acreage harvested in 2004, including second harvests, has not been finalized to date. Similar to 2003, acres harvested during the 2004 season was computed utilizing a Global Positioning System (GPS). When the final draft of this Report was prepared for review by the LMCD Board of Directors and the EWM/Exotics Task Force, the necessary details in the field had not been fin alized to determine the total amount of acres harvested in 2004. This should be completed in the near future and this statistic will be forwarded when it is available. 4..Harvester and Truck Loads- The total number of harvester loads in 2004 was 396,25, which generated 196.00 truck loads or 4.46 truck ioads per day. This compares to a total number of harvester loads of 270.75 in 2003, which generated 143.50 or 3.50 truck loads perday. Further details are outlined in the attached chart that highlights 2004 season summary data. Operating Highlights Harvesting priorities were based upon impediment to public boat navigation on the open water, with higher priority given to areas of the lake that were matted. Although there were some areas of the lake with significant milfoil growth that was not aesthetically pleasing, we generally did not harvest them unless they were impeding public boat navigation (i e. Grays Bay along the 101 Causeway). The LMCD has assembled a rotating harvesting schedule for Lake Minnetonka (see attached spreadsheet for further details). In 2004, the LOwer Lake South Option was implemented and will be rotated every fourth year unless there are extraordinary circumstances, in which' case staff would be provided flexibility. Similar to past seasons, a'combination of clear-cutting and channel-cutting was utilized to address harvesting priorities. All areas that dictated the need for harvesting were cut at least once, with high growth areas harvested twice as time permitted. Public response to the harvesting in general was encouraging, with a limited number of telephone calls from the public. Harvested milfoil was mainly corn posted at the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretu m, with occasional loads composted either at the Leuther Farm or Gale Woods Park. These -3172- 2004 EuraSian Watermilfoil (EWM) Final Harvesting Report, Page 2 three sites are a convenient distance from Lake Minnetonka, generally less than 10 miles from most offioad sites. / Personnel Judd Harper served his fourth year as Project Manager in 2004. Chris Sones returned in 2004 for his third year with the program and second year as Site Supervisor. To assist Sones, Jeff Schmidt returned for his second year with the program and first year as Assistant Site Supervisor position. An additional six employees were hired to round out the five seasonal crew positions for the 2004 season, with a 'mixture or new and returning seasonal employees. Overall, the supervisors and harVesting crew should be commended for their efforts and the majority of them have communicated an interest in returning to the program in 2005. Equipment Operation and Maintenance The LMCD contracted with Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. for their fourth year for maintenance of the EWM harvesting equipment. There were a number of repairs made to the equipment in the spring pdor to the launching of it in early June. The efforts made by CurfmanTrucking and Repair, 'lnc. the past four years has resulted in improved efficiency and decreased downtime of the harvesting equipment. One area that was improved for the 2004 season was ensuring .that the used high-speed transport barge . purChased from Aquarius Systems pdor to the 2003 season was fully compatible with all LMCD harvesting equipment. Status of EWM Harvesting Equipment In 2004, the harvesting equipment consisted of two paddlewheel harvesters, one purChased from Hydraulic Boat Company in 2000 and one purchased from Aquarius Systems in 2003, and two propeller driven harvesters purchased by the LMCD in 1989 from United Marine International (UMI). This was complimented when the LMCD purchased a used high-speed transport barge from Aquadus Systems in 2003 to improve the efficiency of the program. Positive steps were made in 2004 utilizing the high-speed transport barge for a cou pie of weeks in July prior to problems occurring with the outboard motor. Problems also occurred in July to the outboard motor on the pontoon that is used for scouting and placement of buoys. The replacement schedule for the harveSting equipment also recommends that a new harvester be purchased by the LMCD in 2004 for the 2005 season. Review of the statistics for each of the four harvesters documents that the two newer paddlewheel harvesters are more efficient and productive. In 2004, harvester load statistics for the four harvesters were as follows: #1- 70.00, ~- 80.75, #5- 144.00, and #6- 102.50.' Staff recommends that an EWM Harvesting Program Working Group meeting be conducted sometime in the near future to review the harvesting program for 2005, with an emphasis on whether to buy .new outboard motors for the high-speed transport barge and the' pontoon, and whether to buy a new paddlewheel harvester. 2004 EWM Harvesting Program Budget Analysis Estimated expenses through mid September for the 2004 Harvesting Program are approximately $101,000, corn pared to budgeted expenses of $106,000. There are a minimal amount of expenses that may be incurred yet this year for the 2004 season. 2004 Phosphorous Removal Sampling Program In 2003, theMinnehaha Creek Watershed District prepared a Report that analyzed the LMCD's EWM Harvesting Program and the amount of phosphorous being removed from Lake Minnetonka in harvested milfoil and other vegetation. This Report was reviewed by the LMCD Board of Directors and the EWM/Exotics Task ForCe, with a consensus that the estimated range of phosphorous removal -3173- .t ,. .. Ii L l 2004 Eurasian Watermilfoil (EWM) Final Harvesting Report, Page 3 He outlined in the Report was too broad. Pdor to the 2004 season, a proposal was received from the Three Rivers Park District to further refine this by sampling milfoil and other vegetation removed during the 2004 season. This proposal was approved by the LMCD Board of Directors and was funded with "Save the Lake" funds. The sampling of milfoil and other vegetation has been completed in the field and is currently being analyzed by the Three Rivers Park District. A Report summarizing the results of this program should be completed by early October. Conclusions The 16th year of the EWM Harvesting Program represents an accomplishment that was only envisioned as a fond dream back in 1988. The investment in equipment and personnel has put the LMCD in the forefront of managing milfoil. Mechanical harvesting has earned its place as an effective milfoil control method, The LMCD Board is to be credited for its active support of the harvesting program in the face of periodic skepticism or outright objections. The member cities are to be credited for their commitment and funding of the program all these years, Additionally, the MN DNR, the Three Rivers Park District, the U of M Division of Fisheries, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are to be recognized for'their cooperative partnership since the inception of the milfoil harvesting program on Lake Minnetonka. -3174- -_3.176- :¢. -3177- -3178- ~. -31.79~. ILl -3180- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Board of Directors Planning/Workshop Session Meeting Report 7:00 p.m., Wednesday, September 8, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall, 4201 Manitou Road, Tonka Bay, MN 55331 Members present: Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orr Burma, Mound; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Debbie Halvorson, Orono; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Tom Scanlon, Spring Park. Also present: Greg Nybeck, Executive Director. Members absent: Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; the City of Greenwood has no appointed member. Call meeting to order. Skramstad called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. He recommended that the Board should try to limit discussion at this Planning/workshop Session to two hours. The Board concurred with this recommendation. Discussion of possible topics for this and future Planning/workshop Sessions. Skramstad stated that there were a number of possible topics to be discussed at this and future Planning/Workshop Sessions. Skramstad indicated that he and Nybeck had prepared a tentative list for discussion by the Board. He believed that a number of topics could be discussed at future Planning/Workshop Sessions later in the fall and winter. These included: 1) LMCD Code Section 2.05- Special Density Licenses (updating public amenities), 2) LMCD Code Section 2.09- Deicing Installations (updating Code for recently declared moratorium, 3) LMCD Code Section 3.021-"High-Water" Emergencies (updating procedures in Code), 4) Scheduling a meeting(s) with the largest dock installers and realtors to review LMCD Code, 5) Board member introductions and orientation {get to know each other's background and interests), 6) Annual review of the LMCD, and 7) Any other topics that individual Board members would like to discuss. He recommended that the Board discuss four topics at this Planning/Workshop Session. These included: 1) the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee, 2) Improvements to LMCD technology (LMCD Board Meetings and LMCD office), 3) Scheduling a date for the EWM Harvesting Program Working Group to evaluate the program for 2005, and 4) Improved public access/channel signage project planned for 2004/2005. If the Board did not object to this recommendation, Skramstad stated that these four topics would be discussed at this Workshop/Planning Session. There were no objections. Four other topics were raised by Board members to discuss at a future Planning/Workshop Session. These included: 1) Nelson recommended that the Board needed to discuss the "Black Lake/Green Lake" concept and how it could possibly be introduced in the upcoming legislative session, 2) Babcock recommended that wetland protection needs to be discussed, 3) Van Hercke recommended that the rental of boats at private residences needs to be discussed, and 4) Scanlon recommended that the concept of increasing of speed limits during winter months in channel areas needs to be discussed. Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee Skramstad asked Foster to lead the discussion on this topic since he chaired this sub-committee. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board PlanningNVorkshop Session September 8, 2004 Page2 Foster stated that the Final Report for the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee was provided at a recent Board Meeting and Board members were encouraged to forward their comments on it. Only a few comments were received from Board members and he believed it would be beneficial to review and discuss the Final Report at this Workshop/Planning Session to get feedback from the Board on it. The Board agreed with the recommendation made by Foster. Foster · provided the following overview on the Final Report for this sub-committee: He briefly reviewed the problem, the action by the LMCD Board, the action by the Boat Density sub- committee, and the goal of a changed or updated policy. · There are three facts recognized in the Final Report. First, there have been numerous changes in LMCD ordinances to protect the lake from over crowding due to having too many boat stored on the shore overnight since the policy was written in 1974. Some of these include: 1) adding the 1:50' General Rule in 1978, 2) the change of the 200' foot dock length to 100' for multiple docks after 1974, 3) changing the unlimited BSU storage within the dock use area to the 2/4 boat rule in the late 1970's, 4) adding the 1:10' storage density for special density licenses in the early 1980's, 5) the addition of the public amenity requirement for special density licenses in the late 1980's, 6) changing the outlot rule in the 1990's to tighten residency requirements, and 7) allowing the Board to adjust for meandering shoreline in the late 1990's. Second, the 1991 Management Plan treats density on a lakewide basis and not on a bay by bay basis. Third, the 1991 Management Plan has a stronger focus on active use rather than storage density. · There are a number of common themes amongst the sub-committee that did not have unanimous consensus. Some of these include: 1) the 1974 policy is outdated and needs to be updated with a new policy, 2) some of the indexes in the 1974 policy need to be changed, dropped, or added to, and 3) continue the strategy contained in both the 1974 policy and the 1991 Management Plan of ' ' managing the lake density based on the nicest summer weekend days when most of the public wants to go boating. Foster stated that he would like feedback from the Board on the third common theme prior to continuing with the remaining common themes. The Board discussed the third common theme as recommended by Foster. Some of the discussion included: · The perception that Lake Minnetonka has become used more crowded, despite approximately the same number of boats being stored on the shore and the same number of active boats during peak and non-peak periods. One contributing factor to this perception is that the boats have gotten bigger and the drivers of the boats are in more of a hurry, which results in larger wakes. · There has been a significant increase in the population in the western suburbs in the past 25 to 30 years, resulting in a greater number of residences near the Lake Minnetonka. This has been compounded with boats becoming generally more affordable currently that they were 25 to 30 years ago based on income and boat costs. These two factors have resulted in increased pressure to use Lake Minnetonka and should possibly be considered in a new updated policy, including the concept of responding to this demand on a gradual basis. · The greater percentage of the larger cruiser type watercraft on Lake Minnetonka are stored at commercial facilities rather than private residential sites. · There was discussion that boat use on Lake Minnetonka was proportionate to the square distance from the lake and whether there was a need to add protection for residents on Lake Minnetonka for the six to eight ideal peak period days each boating season. -3182- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board Planning/Workshop Session September 8, 2004 Page 3 · The aerial surveys conducted every four years by the LMCD and the MN DNR and whether it was the proper frequency to conduct this project for trend analysis. · The different perceptions of Lake Minnetonka between the property owners and those that use that lake that do not live on it, including fixing the problems across the board rather than just at riparian residences. · Re-evaluating the 1974 policy by examining current day standards utilizing the methodology in current day standards. · The primary problems associated with Lake Minnetonka are courtesy issues rather than public safety based on statistics. However, some Board members expressed a perception of increased public safety problems based on the quality of the experience. Foster · continued his comments: Other common themes include: 4) control needs to be exercised to ensure that the boat density sub- committee does not suffer from scope creep, 5) it was recognized that the working papers might be useful for the Board of Directors to review, although it is not necessary to send a complete set out, 6) there is a need to protect wetland and emergent vegetation areas, 7) declaring a bay "Quiet Waters" would be one of the remedies for a bay that is deemed critically dense, 8) continue to consider the impact of the 1992 700 car trailer access plans as it affects the density of boats stored or used on Lake Minnetonka, 9) there was discussion, without agreement, that some areas of the lake historically and readily support a "Harborage Concept", and 10) there was discussion, without agreement, that density associated with harborage areas cannot be supported on a lakewide basis and may need to be offset through protection from density growth, or mitigation. The sub-committee stated that they believed there were six topics determined to be out of scope. One of these topics included possibly zoning areas of the lake using a weighting and rating scale for density standards for indices in certain areas. There was general consensus that zoning was a larger effort and out of scope at this time. Babcock stated that he believed there was some justification for zoning the lake, although he recognized that it would be a large task. He supported the zoning approach because he believed that the terminology was currently available that was not 30 years ago, it allows for flexibility on a bay by bay basis, and it allows the public to better understand the rules that apply to their sites based on the zone where their residence is located. Foster stated that the sub-committee believed that there were influential factors contributing to the need to update or modify the 1974 policy to better reflect current lake management thinking. Some of these include: 1) influential factors (whether the 1:50' General Rule was adequate, 2) the perception that lake has become more crowded, 3) that boat storage has increased only 15% from the 1970's through the 2002 season), 4) whether to use the 14,043 acres of water for Lake Minnetonka or 11,773 that excludes the 150' shorezone for the entire lake, and 5) Lake Minnetonka is generally safe and the need to work with the Sheriff's Water Patrol in areas that are determined to be unsafe. The Board briefly discussed how the goal of 700 car/trailer spots for Lake Minnetonka was based on MN DNR standards and how it uses the 14,043 acreage figure rather than the 11,773 acreage figure. Additionally, the Board briefly discussed how usage of parts of Lake Minnetonka has been impacted based on the growth of milfoil. Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board Planning/VVorkshop Session September 8, 2004 Page 4 Foster stated that the sub-committee believed that some of the basic strategy contained in the 1974 policy was valid going forward. Some of the factors to include: 1) there needs to be a consistent written policy relating to watercraft storage density that can be applied on a lakewide basis, 2) the policy needs to state the long-term density management intent, while the ordinances need to define specific criteria that may change over time, 3) the Board desires to have specific objective criteria defined and delineated to help manage changes in boat storage, while maintaining flexibility for future Boards to act, 4) the concepts of certain index based triggers and limits as applied on an area by area basis are valid as a guide when considering new storage requests, and 5) both storage density and active use density need to be co-managed. Foster believed that the primary purpose of an updated policy would be to set expectations to allow the Board to review an application submitted utilizing the policy rather than the policy itself making a decision for the Board. Nelson stated that he believed there was a need for the Board to discuss procedures on how to implement an updated policy for reviewing an application submitted. Babcock concurred that he believed there was a need to balance an updated policy with the ordinances. He stated that although a future Board could change any ordinance adopted by the current Board, he believed that Boards are more reluctant to change an ordinance rather than interpret a policy differently. Foster stated that the sub-committee has a number of recommendations. These include: 1) keep some of the 1974 policy intact, 2) review the strategy of treating all areas of the lake equally against the Management Plan goals of preserving existing area characteristics, 3) update and refine the policy's triggers and limits to reflect current lake management thinking, 4) identify remedies and include them as factors for triggers and limits, 5) investigate assigning a weighting to triggers or factors, 6) identify and recognize special cases (such as current dense storage areas, public safety history, transient areas, and high public use areas), 7) identify and recognize sensitive areas such as wetlands, channels, and shallow areas, 8) encourage the continued development of transient storage locations to provide an alternative for active watercraft use, 9) ensure policy changes are consistent with the Management Plan, and 10) recognize that the updated policy needs to be a living document, particularly in response to the user attitude surveys conducted every four years. He stated that the Final Report summarizes a couple of action items outside the sub-committee and he asked the Board what steps they would like to take next. Skramstad expressed concern about zoning the lake because he believed that it would place the LMCD in a difficult position if the Board concluded that certain areas of the lake are more dense and cannot store as many boats as other areas. He believed that active boat density on Lake Minnetonka is self-regulated and that boaters will go to other bodies of water if they believe that Lake Minnetonka has become overcrowded because they have a choice. Foster stated that he would prefer taking the reference to the 1974 policy out of the ordinances and tackling certain specific topics, such as wetland protection and rental of watercraft at residences through ordinance changes. The Board discussed how the LMCD is in enforcing its current ordinances on the rental of watercraft at residences and whether watercraft are stored within the dock use area for the site. There was discussion that sites around the lake might be in compliance with the Code for being contained within the dock use area for specific sites because of the consent clause. However, consent arrangements are prohibited by Code at the neighborhood level for the rental of watercraft and there were questions on how active LMCD staff should get in enforcing this. There was discussion amongst Board members that it would be beneficial to have a map -3184- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board Planning/Workshop Session September 8, 2004 Page 5 that delineates wetland areas around the lake, possibly utilizing either the fieldwork conducted by LMCD staff or other governmental agencies, such the MCWD. Skramstad asked Foster on how he would like to proceed with this topic. Foster stated that he believed further Board discussion should take place in the near future. This would allow the Board to further consider the 1974 policy and the possible direction to go. He stated that he would work with Skramstad on pulling together a number of options on how the to potentially proceed for discussion at an upcoming Regular Board Meeting. The Board agreed with the recommendation made by Foster. Future discussion of this topic was planned tentatively for the 10/27/04 Regular Board Meeting. Skramstad stated that although this meeting was not published as a public hearing, there were two members of the general public that were in attendance for this topic. He asked the general public for any brief comments that they might have on this topic. Mr. Randy Boyd, 19960 Minnetonka Blvd., expressed concern about the Board considering the "Harborage Concept" and mitigating in other areas, such as Halsted's Bay, because he believed that the boats on Lower Lake generally stay on the Lower Lake. This concept is also true of the Upper Lake. With regards to sailboats, he believed that a quality of the experience issue already exists with other watercraft, especially those that create larger wakes. He stated that one problem associated with transient slips, anchored watercraft, or fishing boats is that they are not counted in the aerial survey conducted by the LMCD because they do not have wakes. Ms. Pat McGoldrick, 19575 W. Chimo, stated that she and her husband resided adjacent to the public access on Carsons Bay. One trend that she stated that she had observed in recent years is that boats are being launched and the trailers are being taken home rather than being parked in designated parking areas. Because of this trend, these boats are not being counted in the active car/trailer counts in conjunction with the aerial survey. She expressed concern about comparing Carsons Bay to Excelsior Bay for the "Harborage Concept" because Carsons Bay is primarily residential. Skramstad thanked the Board and the general public for their discussion on this topic. · Improvements to LMCD technology (LMCD Board Meetings and LMCD Office). Skramstad asked for an update on this topic from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that progress continued on the possible use of Wayzata City Hall for the purpose of taping Regular Board Meetings for local cable television. He stated that he and Skramstad had discussed the concept of improving visual aids for the Board and the public at Regular Board Meetings, whether or not the meetings relocate to the City of Wayzata. He concluded by stating that he would need to meet with Skramstad to further refine improvements to LMCD technology so that a recommendation could be made to the Board, Skramstad stated that he envisioned utilizing existing GI$ maps available at Hennepin County and modifying them for LMCD purposes to improve visual aids. -3185- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board Planning/Workshop Session September 8, 2004 Page 6 · Schedulin,q a date for the EWM Harvestinq Pro,qram Workinq Group to evaluate the pro,qram for 2005 Skramstad asked for an update on this topic from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that the Final Report for the 2004 EWM Harvesting Season would be presented at the 9/22/04 Regular Board Meeting. One of the recommendations made in this Report will include scheduling a Working Group Meeting to evaluate the 2004 season and possible changes for 2005. The LMCD has established a replacement schedule for the harvesters, with new equipment purchased in 1999 and 2002. The schedule calls for a harvester to be replaced in 2004 and he recommended that a Working Group Meeting be coordinated in the near future to get this process moving forward. Other capital equipment might need to be purchased for 2005, including outboard motors for the pontoon and the transport barge, and he asked of there were any Board members interested in participating an upcoming Working Group Meeting to take place on a Saturday morning. The Board briefly discussed this and Board members Suerth, Skramstad, and Babcock expressed an interest in attending the Working Group Meeting. Improved public access/channel si.qna.qe proiect planned for 2004/2005. Skramstad asked for background from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that there is $5,000 in both the 2004 and 2005 LMCD Budget to improve public access and channel signage on Lake Minnetonka. Background work has been conducted by LMCD staff to have new signage prepared for the 2005 season at public accesses and commercial marinas next spring. He stated that he hoped a final draft would be proposed for review and approval by the Board right around the first of the year. Work is being finalized by the LMCD office on the final design and costs estimates for these signs and he asked if there were any Board members that would like to participate in this process. Babcock stated that he would work with LMCD staff on this project. Other discussion. There was no other discussion. Adjournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Tom Skramstad, Chair -3186- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, September 22, 2004 Tonka Bay City Hall CALL TO ORDER Skramstad called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Bob Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Orv Burma, Mound; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Debbie Halvorson, Orono; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Tom Scanlon, Spring Park; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Herb Suerth, Woodland. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Emily Herman, Administrative Secretary. Members absent: Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka; the City of Greenwood has no appointed member. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad Skramstad stated that Nybeck would like to discuss potential dates for the annual meeting with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol and the October Regular LMCD Board meeting schedule. Nybeck stated that the LMCD annually meets with Sheriff's Water Patrol in the fall. Because of the upcoming election day in early November, it appears that the meeting would need to be coordinated after election day. The meeting has traditionally been held at the Sheriff's Water Patrol headquarters at 7:30 a.m. Three dates Nybeck proposed include November 9th, 16th, and 17th. The consensus of the Board was to allow Nybeck to work with Lt. Storms to schedule the annual meeting with the Sheriff's Water Patrol on one of these three dates. Nybeck stated that LMCD Board meetings were scheduled for October 13th and 27th during the month. He recommended that a Board Planning/Workshop Session be conducted on October 13th and that a Regular Board Meeting be conducted on October 27th. The consensus of the Board was to schedule Board meetings during the month of October as recommended by Nybeck. READING OF MINUTES- 7~28~04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 8/11/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 9~8~04 LMCD Board Planning/Workshop Meeting Report MOTION: Nelson moved, Babcock seconded to approve the minutes from the 7~28~04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting as submitted. -3187- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page2 AYES: Ayes (7), Abstained (4; Ambrose, Foster, Skramstad, and Suerth); motion carried; MOTION: Scanlon moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the minutes from the 8/11/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting as submitted. AYES: Ayes (8), Abstained (3; Burma, Halvorson, and Seutjens); motion carried. Nybeck stated that the Report from the 9/8/04 LMCD Board PlanningNVorkshop Session would be available at the 10/27/04 Regular Board Meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda. Mr. Randy Boyd, 19960 Minnetonka Blvd., stated that he was in attendance to comment on the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee. The policy that was authored in 1974 was written with conservation in mind. He stated that he believed the 1974 policy assisted in maintaining density standards in Carsons and St Louis Bays and has discouraged the City of Deephaven from expanding its municipal docking program in these bays. If the Board were to make changes to the 1974 policy, he believed that the LMCD should conduct a hearing to get input from the public. He believed that the LMCD had gone to great lengths to make policy changes for the City of Deephaven applications that have been pending for nearly two years. CONSENT AGENDA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Halvorson moved, Seuntjens seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include: 2A, Minutes from the 8/13/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting and 3B, July and August financial summary and balance sheets. LAKE USE & RECREATION A. Review of 2004 Lake Minnetonka Boat Storage Shoreline Inventory. Skramstad asked for background from Nybeck. Nybeck stated that LMCD Administrative Secretary Emily Herman assisted Judd Harper in conducting the fieldwork for this project. Nybeck stated that Herman also assisted him in the preparation of the draft Report and she was in attendance to provide an overview. Herman made the following comments: · The 2004 Report is very similar to historical Reports, pointing out that it outlines the objectives, it outlines the methodology used, it provides current and historical summaries, it outlines trends, and it draws a conclusion(s). · Three objectives were established for this project. These include: 1) establish the total number of watercraft stored in 2004, 2) outline data collected from historical shoreline storage counts, and 3) identify any observable trends. · The methodology used in 2004 was very similar to past projects. The fieldwork was conducted from June 16th to August 19th from 8:00 a.m. to 12 p.m. Each watercraft that was -3188- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 3 counted was categorized in one of the 10 categories, which are outlined in Appendix A. Additionally, the number of residences that had three boats, four boats, or empty slips was documented. Appendix B outlines summary figures for riparian residences, Appendix C outlines summary figures for multiple dock facilities, and Appendix E outlines summary figures for both dparian residences and multiple dock facilities. In 2004, there were 9,734 watercraft stored on Lake Minnetonka, with 6,085 watercraft stored at riparian residences and 3,649 stored at multiple dock facilities (including districting mooring areas). There were 557 watercraft stored on 10 bays within the Mound Commons Docking Program. The 557 of watercraft within the Mound Commons Docking Program were broken down on a bay'-by-bay basis; however, they were not broken down by classification. Appendix D outlines the number of residences that had either three or four restricted watercraft being stored at it, in addition to those residences that had empty slips. She stated that there was an insignificant increase in the number of residences that had three or four restricted watercraft being stored at the dock. However, there was a 26% increase in the number of empty slips compared to 2002. Appendix E outlines historical shoreline storage counts. There are two separate categories for trend analysis in the Report. These include: 1) analyzing overall watercraft storage, and 2) analyzing historical changes in the types of watercraft being stored. In 2004, there was a 7.4% decrease in the overall watercraft storage from 2002 to 2004. Possible contributing factors include poor weather and the economy. However, this decrease was entirely the result of the 11.9% decrease from 2002 to 2004 in the number of watercraft being stored at riparian residences. From a historical standpoint, there has been over a 600% increase in personal watercraft stored on Lake Minnetonka from 1990 to 2004. This increase has greatly contributed to the number of sites on the lake that might not comply with Code Section 2.02. There has been a significant decrease in the number of sailboats stored on Lake Minnetonka from 1,648 in 1975 to 655 in 2004. She stated that the outcome of the 2004 project was more consistent with the 1998, 1999, and 2000 shoreline storage counts rather the project conducted in 2002. She suggested that the Board might want to consider whether to conduct the project again in 2005. Skramstad asked approximately how many hours were spend conducting the fieldwork. Nybeck stated that the fieldwork required two staff members and approximately 60 hours per staff member. Seuntjens asked for the significance in the three boat and four boat statistic in the Report. Nybeck stated that 1998 was the first years that he participated in this project. At that time, the Board was discussing the number of residents that were storing three and four restricted watercraft at their dock. Because of this, this statistic was included in the methodology. Additionally, empty slips were included in the methodology. For those sites that are storing more than four restricted watercraft, boat registrations are taken and letters are sent out if they are not in compliance with Code Section 2.02. Foster stated that the three boat, four boat, and empty slip data was collected to check on residences that might be renting out dock spaces. He believed that this trend was not as significant as originally -3189- :- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 4 believed and that it would be beneficial to make this historical information available to the Board. For those residences with three or four watercraft being stored at a site, he believed it would be beneficial to document the number of PWC's being stored at them. Babcock stated that he believed there are approximately 3,500 residential sites on Lake Minnetonka. With over 600 of these sites storing three or more restricted watercraft, that would represent approximately 1/6 of the sites on Lake Minnetonka. Additionally, there are approximately 1/6 of the sites that have empty slips. He expressed concern about the reduction of boats being stored at riparian sites in 2004, approximately 6,000, compared to approximately 6,900 in 2002. Excluding the sites that had three or four restricted watercraft stored at them, this would indicate that one boat was lost from approximately each third lot. He believed that this was statistically significant and might be a reason to conduct the project again in 2005 to reconcile these figures. Skramstad questioned how the concerns raised by Babcock could be addressed without conducting the project in 2005. Staff raised the question in the Report on whether the Board would like to have the project done again in 2005 and he asked Nybeck for his opinion. Nybeck stated that his preference would be to conduct the project every two years, with the next project targeted for 2006. However, an argument could be made to conduct the project again in 2005. The consensus of the Board was to conduct the project next during the 2006 boating season and for Babcock to work with staff to reconcile the number of residences on Lake Minnetonka. Bob Albertson, discussion of coordinating volunteers for boat safety and theft prevention. Skramstad stated that Bob Albertson was placed on the agenda at the request of Board member Scanlon. Albertson was not in attendance at this meeting and he asked Scanlon for a brief background on the purpose of this agenda item. Scanlon recommended that this agenda item be postponed and rescheduled for another Board meeting. He believed that the primary purpose of this agenda item was to discuss the concept of an operation I.D. for boat safety and theft prevention on Lake Minnetonka, in conjunction with the Sheriff's Water Patrol. Nelson stated that there was a higher amount of thefts that occurred in Smithtown Bay this summer. Three individuals were located with stolen property in their possession; however, they were not prosecuted because the thefts were not reported. He believed that an awareness policy should be considered by the Board or whatever agency was deemed to be appropriate. The Board discussed thefts and whether they get reported to the Sheriff's Water Patrol because the party that had their equipment stolen does not file an insurance claim. There was discussion that thefts have a higher tendency to occur at large cluster of boats, such as commercial marinas. The Board discussed the need to discuss with the Sheriffs Water Patrol if there was a way to improve communication efforts on thefts with the local police departments. The consensus of the Board was to continue this discussion until a Board meeting in which Bob Albertson was in attendance. -3190- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 5 C. Review of comments from LMCD member cities on draft Six Mile Creek resolution. Skramstad reminded the Board that it discussed a draft Six Mile Creek resolution at its 7/28/04 meeting. No action was taken by the Board at this meeting to get feedback and comments back from the 14 member cities. He stated that he had visited two city councils to discus this matter and that the office had received some feedback from other member cities. Skramstad stated that he had expectations that each Board member would talk to their respective city council and get their feedback on how they would like the LMCD to proceed. He asked Nybeck to add any additional comments. Nybeck stated that written feedback had been received from Deephaven, Mound, and Tonka Bay, All three cities had different opinions on this issue; however, none of them adopted the sample resolution the LMCD sent out to them. He believed that the City of Orono might discuss this issue sometime in the near future and there have been other member cities that have provided verbal feedback. A few Board members summarized their discussion with their respective city councils. A summary of their discussion is detailed below: · Ambrose stated that the Wayzata city council discussed this issue and they have some interest. However, they deferred to the LMCD Board of Directors to make the decisions on the surface area of Lake Minnetonka. · Babcock stated that he had discussed this issue with the Tonka Bay city council and they have decided to defer any official action until after the October 5th mayors meeting scheduled in which Senator Olson is scheduled to attend. Babcock stated that he or another representative of the LMCD should attend this mayor meeting; however, an invitation had not been extended. · Halvorson stated that she had received verbal feedback from the Orono city council that they would not be adopting the sample resolution forwarded to them by the LMCD. There are other means to adopt these concerns through the member cities, the MCWD, and the MN DNR. Skramstad encouraged the remaining Board members to solicit comments from their respective city council. He opened the discussion up to the general public, although this agenda item was not a scheduled public hearing. Mr. Gabriel Jabbour, 985 Tonkawa Road, made the following comments: · He stated that he was not in attendance to discuss the merits of the tributary ordinance or the means that the legislation was adopted. However, he asked the Board to reconsider its position because he did not believe Senator Olson would change the legislation even if there were a consensus amongst the LMCD member cities. · He stated that he believed the City of Minnetrista could adopt the ordinance that was adopted by the LMCD, with even the possibility of the LMCD being named the local governmental unit. There are a number of issues locally that need the support of its local legislators, including Highway 12 and the zebra mussels concerns for Lake Minnetonka. He stated that the tributaries in the ordinance were in the Minnetrista and Orono, noting that they are two of the most environmentally concerned cities on Lake Minnetonka. · He stated that he had encouraged Senator OIson not to coordinate a mayor meeting; however, the meeting has been scheduled. Based on his past experience, these meetings are time limited and the mayor that is the most verbal will steer the direction of the meeting. -3191 - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 6 · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Burma stated that he agreed with the comments made by Jabbour. Although he disagreed with the legislation and the manner in which it was done, he did not believe the LMCD could win this battle and he encouraged the Board to move on. Scanlon stated that although he did not want to challenge Senator Olson on this matter, he did not believe adopting a resolution that summarizes how the LMCD feels would be problematic, At that point, the LMCD could then move on. Nelson stated that he believed Senator Olson was a friend on environmental issues in the legislature, including zebra mussels. He recommended that the Board should give up this fight and allow other governmental agencies to take up this issue, such as Minnetrista and the MCWD. Jabbour expressed concern about Lake Minnetonka related issues that might be communicated in an upcoming edition of the Minneapolis Star Tribune. Skramstad stated that one compromise that was brought to his attention was another ordinance that would grandfather the affected properties that had historical rights on Six Mile Creek. This city expressed concern about the LMCD taking away historical riparian rights. Babcock stated that the only thing that changed with the tributary ordinance was the type of watercraft that could be used in these creeks. Foster stated that he did not believe there was a need to contest Senator Olson on this issue and he recommended that the Board not pursue it any further. Babcock stated that the Tonka Bay city council was very surprised when he brought to their attention that docking rights did not change. The only change was to limit the type of motor that could be used in those tributaries and he did not believe that this had been represented effectively. He did not believe that the changes made to the enabling legislation were done responsibly because the LMCD was not consulted. He expressed his support to adopt the resolution and he was not troubled with this issue being debated in the newspapers because the LMCD was not forcing this issue. Skramstad stated that there is a lot of misinformation out in the public. This includes that the LMCD had not talked to either the affected residents on Six Mile Creek or with the City of Minnetrista. Knudsen stated that he generally agreed with the comments made by Babcock. Although he recognized the comments made by Jabbour, he was troubled with the legislation change that was made that restricted the jurisdiction of the LMCD, including the process in which it was done. Senator Olson did not communicate jurisdictional concerns that she had with either the LMCD or the City of Minnetrista when she had the opportunity. At this time, he believed that the City of Minnetrista has determined that they have jurisdiction and that they will likely be doing something to address the concerns that the LMCD had. He stated that he did believe grandfathering discussion was not -3192- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting Page 7 September 22, 2004 appropriate at this time because the LMCD does not have jurisdiction because of the recent legislation. Foster stated that he agreed with Babcock that the LMCD acted responsibly and came up out with a creative solution. However, this creative solution got trumped at the last minute by some local legislators and he believed that the LMCD would be best off just to let it lay. Seuntjens stated that there might be a better need to improve communications with the member cities based on the feedback received at this meeting. He recommended that the Board not adopt the draft resolution and move on. Babcock stated that he had no personal interest and that he makes decisions on what is best for Lake Minnetonka. He lived on Halsteds Bay for eight years and he knows how bad the environmental issues are on that bay. He believed that the Board needs to champion some of these issues around the lake as a whole. Otherwise, private interests will get the better over environmental issues. Mr. David Gross, 19700 Lakeview Avenue, stated that he was at the Deephaven city council meeting when this was discussed. The City of Deephaven is 1 O0 percent behind LMCD Ordinance 178 and the intent of preventing additional phosphorous into Lake Minnetonka. However, the City of Deephaven would like the LMCD to use its influence to get a regulation to restrict the flow of phosphorus into Lake Minnetonka. Suerth stated that he believed it was time to move on and let the City of Minnetrista deal with this issue on Six Mile Creek. The LMCD could offer its assistance in any background information deemed necessary. Ms. Lili McMillan, an Orono city council member, reminded the Board that she had served on the LMCD Board of Directors in recent years. She participated in the discussions of this ordinance as a Board member and she believed that the jurisdictional question was a gray area. This has been defined by the recent legislation and it is time for the LMCD to move and work with the member cities on how to better protect these areas. She stated that she was in favor of the LMCD producing a statement to the cities and educating them on the needs to protecting these areas. LeFevere stated that he did not have an answer on the exact location of the jurisdictional line on Six Mile and Painter's Creek in light of the recent legislation. Cities have the ability to claim jurisdiction that is entirely within one city. If a city takes this position and adopts a similar ordinance, it is likely that the city would have some of the same challenges that the LMCD faced, including taking away a perceived historical right. MOTION: Suerth moved, Babcock seconded to rescind the resolution adopted and to direct Chair Skramstad to prepare a one-page white paper that summarizes the facts considered and the process followed by the Board. Seuntjens stated that the Board had not adopted a resolution and that the summary sheet should be kept simple. He recommended a friendly amendment to strike the reference to the resolution adopted -3193- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 and to change the reference to the length of the summary sheet as simple as possible. Babcock agreed to this. Page 8 Suerth and Halvorson stated that she would like to have language added to the motion encouraging Minnetrista and Orono to adopt similar types of ordinances to protect these areas. Seuntjens stated that he would like to have language added to the motion that states that the LMCD is dropping its request for comments and feedback from the member cities on the draft sample resolution. Foster stated that he agreed the member cities should be informed that the LMCD was dropping its request for the member cities to consider the draft sample resolution. VOTE: Ayes (9), Nayes (2; Foster and Nelson); motion carried. D. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 2. EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE B. Report from the 8/13/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. There was no Report from the 8/13/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. C. Review of 2004 EWM Harvesting Program Final Season Report. Skramstad asked for background from Nybeck. Nybeck highlighted the key points of the 2004 Report. These included: · The 2004 season consisted of 43 working days when it commenced on 6/14/04 and continued through 8/14/04. Lake levels in 2004 were high compared to 2003, especially during the month of June. Total acres harvested in 2004 have not been finalized because staff was working with the site supervisors to check into some apparent inadequacies with the data entered in with the handheld GPS. The total number of harvester loads in 2004 was 396.25, which generated 196.00 truck loads or 4.46 truck loads per day. This compares to a total number of harvester loads of 270.75 in 2003, which generated 143.50 or 3.50 truck loads per day. · Harvesting priorities in 2004 were based upon impediment to public navigation on the open water, with higher priority given to matted areas. A combination of clear-cutting and channel- cutting was utilized in 2004 with the Lower Lake South option implemented. Lake Minnetonka was harvested once, with a number of areas harvested twice. · Judd Harper served as Project Manager for the fourth consecutive year. Chris Sones served as Site Supervisor, Jeff Schmidt served as Assistant Site Supervisor, and six other seasonal employees were hired to fill out the remaining five positions. -3194- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 9 Curfman Trucking and Repair, Inc. served as the mechanic for the fourth consecutive year in 2004. Their work the past four years has improved the efficiency of the equipment and decreased downtime. Capital equipment in the program include two paddle wheel harvesters, purchased in 2000 and 2003, and two propeller driven harvesters purchased in 1989. This equipment is complimented with a used high-speed transport barge purchased in 2003. He reviewed the harvester load statistics of the paddle wheel harvesters versus the propeller driven harvesters, pointing out that the paddle wheel harvesters are much more productive. A Working Group meeting has been scheduled for 10/2/04 at 9:00 a.m. in the LMCD office to discuss the 2004 season and possible capital equipment purchases for 2005, including a new paddle wheel harvester and new outboard motors for the high-speed transport barge and the pontoon. He estimated that expenses for the program will be at or below what was budgeted in 2004, $106,000. In 2004, a grant of approximately $41,000 was received from the MN DNR for the program. A report from Three Rivers Park District should be available sometime in October that would further refine estimations from the MCWD on the amount of phosphorous removed from Lake Minnetonka in harvested milfoil. He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Skramstad commended Chris Sones for the job performed in 2004. He asked Sones if he had any additional comments. Sones stated that hiring eight seasonal employees, including him, for seven employees worked well. The seasonal employees hired primarily consisted of school teachers and college students, noting that the schedules coordinate quite well with the harvesting program. Hiring the extra seasonal employee provided flexibility for scheduling conflicts and allowed for a greater number of hours to harvest without the LMCD having to pay for as much overtime. He concurred with Nybeck that the two newer paddle wheel harvested performed much better than the two propeller ddven harvesters, especially in light to 2004 being a heavy growth year. Skramstad asked Sones what he needed from the office, if any, for the day-to-day operations. Sones stated that he generally had daily contact with the office, primarily telephone communications. Additionally, there were weekly meetings on site with either Nybeck or Harper. Otherwise, the crew was relatively self-supporting based on the guidance provided by Nybeck and Harper. Suerth stated that he believed the management in the field in recent years has improved substantially. He asked Sones for his comments on the use of the high-speed transport barge based on the limited use in 2004. Sones stated that the transport barge was beneficial in area of Lake Minnetonka where the transport distance from the harvested areas is quite long. Other areas with shorter transport distance, such as Carmans Bay, it might not be as beneficial. -3195- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 10 Babcock complimented the efforts made by staff in recent years to bring the program within budgeted expenses. Additionally, he expressed his support to the MN DNR for the grant they contribute to the program and recommended that a letter be sent from the LMCD to the MN DNR thanking them. Nybeck asked if any Board members had an interest in attending the 10/2/04 EWM Harvesting Program Working Group Meeting. Board members Babcock, Skramstad, and Suerth expressed an interest. D. Additional Business. There was no additional business. FINANCIAL A. Audit of vouchers (8/16/04 - 8/31/04), (9/1/04 - 9/15/04) & (9/16/04 - 9/30104). Knudsen reviewed the audit of vouchers as submitted. Nybeck stated that one check should be added to the audit of vouchers for 9/16/04 - 9/30/04. Check 14677 to Superior Ford, Inc., dated 9/22/04, for $1,557.65 should be added to the voucher list. MOTION: Nelson moved, Seuntjens seconded to approve the vouchers, adding check 14677 to Superior Ford (dated 9/22/04) in the amount of $1,557.65. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. C. Additional Business. There was no additional business. WATER STRUCTURES A. Miles B. and Pamela Canning, discussion of 9/1/04 letter recommending mediation. Skramstad asked for background on this agenda item from LeFevere. LeFevere stated that George Hoff had prepared the compliant on this case; however, it had not been served on the Cannings because they apparently were not home. In Hennepin County, part of the process is to go through alternative dispute resolution. The two parties can discuss on how to accomplish this, which is typically done through a joint statement. Arbitration and mediation are two means to go through alternative dispute resolution that will likely occur early in the process. Hoff would likely make a number of the decisions relating to mediation and whether it would work. Skramstad asked what the role of the Board would be in that process. LeFevere stated that Hoff might want input from the Board prior to going mediation. The mediation might include the involvement of one or more Board members, in addition to staff. Ideally, mediation works best with one individual that can make a decision. However, that is problematic for public -3196- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 11 bodies and any successful mediation would likely require a public hearing process, probably through a variance application. The Board members briefly discussed the mediation process, whether there was a need to mediate, and how it would work with the Cannings and the adjacent property owners. B. Additional Business. There was no additional business. 5. SAVE THE LAKE There was no discussion. 6. ADMINISTRATION Nybeck updated the Board on a recent meeting that he and Ambrose had with City of Wayzata staff members regarding the use of the council chambers for Board Meetings in the near future. Progress seems to being made and the LMCD will likely need to purchase a laptop computer. A target date of possibly as early as November has been set. Skramstad asked to have this discussion formalized for the 10/27/04 Board Meeting. 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck updated the Board on four items. First, the lake level as of 9/22/04 was 928.76', with the dam closed. Second, there was a draft biography of Chair Skramstad as discussed by the Board at the 9/8/04 Board Planning/workshop Session. Third, he recommended that the Board should schedule an agenda item for an upcoming Planning/Workshop Session to discuss Code relating to bridges and where to distinguish the jurisdictional line for the LMCD. Fourth, he stated that he and Lt. Storms were making progress on the possibility of the LMCD and the Sheriff's Water Patrol streamlining the special event process for 2005. However, the earliest this might be done would be next summer. In the meantime, he recommended that all winter special events could be permitted by the Sheriff's Water Patrol and he recommended that the Board could direct LeFevere to prepare an ordinance amendment for consideration by the Board. The Board discussed this recommendation and the consensus was for LeFevere to work with Nybeck on a draft ordinance amendment and a General Permit, for discussion at the 10/27/04 Regular LMCD Board Meeting, on whether to delegate permitting of winter special events to the Sheriff's Water Patrol. 8. OLD BUSINESS Scanlon encouraged the Board to keep the process moving on relocating the LMCD Board Meeting so that they can be taped for local cable television. Babcock stated that he would like the Board to discuss at an upcoming Workshop/Planning Session on -3197- I Ii ,ii ,l ,J ,, IlJl I ~ Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting September 22, 2004 Page 12 whether there was a need to place time limits on long standing applications, such as those pending from the City of Deephaven. 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. 10. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:39 p.m. Tom Skramstad, Chair Jose Valdesuso, Secretary -3198- .4 Irene Bazewicz 3580 Tuxedo Road Mound, MN 55364 October 25, 2004 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Proposed Assessments 6323 Bay Ridge Road Honorable Mayor Meisel and Members of the City Council: I received notification of intention to levy assessments for the road improvement along Bay Ridge Road. I object to being notified of the intention to charge me for improvements I was never given an opportunity to express an objection to before the work was done. It appears you spent my money without consulting me beforehand and now expect me to pay. The water mains along Bay Ridge Road likely did need to be replaced. It is my understanding that the City is not charging residents directly for this. Instead it will be paid for by all taxpayers in Mound. However, would Bay Ridge Road have needed to be replaced if that project was not done? The street appeared, to me, to be in good condition. Therefore, I think this project should be paid for by the city, not the residents along a road that seemed to be in good repair. My property abuts Bay Ridge and faces the cul d' sac. The cul d' sac is private. Mound provides no services for the cul d' sac. The five properties there have paid for paving, maintenance, and plowing of the cul d' sac. This construction project was dirty, noisy, and made the road look difficult to navigate. My property was, unfortunately, up for rent during this project. Most prospective tenants did not even want to come down Bay Ridge to see the property with all the construction going on. The property was vacant for 3 1/2 months during which time the rent was lowered twice. This translated to a loss in income of over $8,000.00 for the year. I do think the construction was a deterrent in a weak rental market. That house has never been vacant for that long nor has the rent ever before been reduced. Now you want to assess me over $_4,000.00 for: A project I did not have an oppommity to express my opinion on. A project that may not have needed to be done. A project that has already cost me over $8,000.00. I object! Very truly yours, Irene Bazewicz DOUGLAg t-IEDQUIgT October 25, 2004 To whom it may concern. I am writing this letter to object to the assessment being put on my property as it creates a hardship for me to pay. I am a single person with only one source of income and I can't afford another bill. My monthly take home is about $2795.00 per month after taxes. My monthly bills are as follows Mortgage 1196.00 2nd Mortgage 400.00 gas 90.00 electric 80.00 water 50.00 phone 32.00 auto insurance 110.00 gas in vehicle to go to work 200.00 visa 379.00 Garbage 26.00 Total 2363.00 As you can see that only leaves me 432.00 a month to buy grocerys and anything else that comes up like dental and medical bills and vehicle repairs. These are summer bills and don't reflect the higher winter heating bills. I don't beleave it right that I have to pay for something I had no say as wether I wanted it or not somebody else made the decision on how they wanted to spend money I don't have. I have refinanced my house three times since I bought to try and reduce my monthly payments but every time I do my taxes and insurance are raisd. And now an assessment I can't afford. I try to put some money in savings every month but something always comes up and I have to tap into it. I have about 70.00 in savings at this time. /~~~ank you for your~ ,it City Clerk City Of Mound, MN. Nancee Wright 2700 West Edge Blvd. Mound, MN. 55364 I received Notice in the mail that I was being assessed $2733.45 against my property. I at this time want to appeal this assessment as my address is WESTEDGE, this project in no way improved the value of my property, I do not use Beachwood Rd. to park on. The drive to my property is on Westedge. When this supposed improvement to my property was started, there was no Notice of hearing, I had a friend of mine call the City of Mound and he was told that only addresses on the affected improvement would be assessed. I feel that this assessment is absurd and unfair. Sincerely ~ ' ~.~ _/.._. Nancee Wright Homeowner Bonnie Ritter Page 1 of 1 From: To: Sent: Subject: "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> "Bonnie Ritter" <BonnieRitter@cityofmound.com>; "kandis hanson" <kandishanson @cityofmound.com> Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:33 AM Update - 4717 Island View Drive Kandis/Bonnie: I had the opportunity to speak with the owner's family representative for the property at 4717 IVD which was cleaned up via nuisance abatement in 2003 and again this year. They will not be attending the PH tonight and indicated that they have no objections to the proposed special assessment. She indicated that the owner's family representatives will be fixing up the property with the intent of putting it on the market in the near future and requested that we share the information with the Council if they have any questions. She requested that I fax copies of all appropriate information which I have prepared and forwarded. 10/26/2004 Mound City Council** After a year of construction we are starting to see maijor changes in Mound take form. As exciting as this is, the closing of streets, unexpected demurs, and general hardship of getting around have caused people to find alternate routes around Motto& The City is well aware of the difficulties thc decrease in traffic has had on all businesses in town. Mid-November the "Mound Vision:" will come alive! The Mound Business Council is asking for the City of Mound's help to promote Mound and it's surrounding businesses. To make this happen we are asking the city to pay for three O) full page ads in the Laker, Gold Miner, Mound Business and the Lakeshore Weekly News. Thc proposed ads would consist o£ 1. The opening of county mad 1:5 - Dates / Layout showing the new mutes to get mound. 2. November Ad: Tree Lighting ceremony and our Holiday Shopping Season promotion (to include business ads around promo) 3. December Ad'. Over the Christmas holiday thanking everyone for their patience and wishing them a "Happy New Year" from our Great City and Fine Merchants. 4. To include any additions / changes the City may have (in the three ads) Note: Enclosed are prop~ved layout and estimated costs for acts' (costs do not include proptxved City chtmges} The goal is to see people come back to Mound and take in what we have to offer. Please feel free to contact Scott Logelin ~ Jubilee Foods 952-472-3108 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mound Bay Business Council The proposed ad layout is as follows: Mound Bay Business Council proposes a center spread to promote the Mound Visions Project and the business in Downtown Mound. We will devote 1 page to an overview of the Vision plan, its benefit to the people of Mound, what's been accomplished so far and what is yet to come. Page 2 will include a listing of all the businesses in Downtown Mound, a sentence or two about what the business offers to residents and how to contact them. Both articles will encourage people to shop locally, especially for the holidays. We will provide the writing, design and production services. Thanks For the opportunity. Estimated ad cost as follows: Mound Business: $900.00 Laker: Full back page (no color) $1290.00 Center page (no color) $2064.00 Lakeshore Weekly News: ½ Page (no color) $825.00 Full Page (no color) $1638.00 Gold Miner: ½ Page $495.34 Full Page $990.68