2004-03-23PLEASE TURN OI*F AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2004; 7:30 PM
MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted
by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or
Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal
sequence.
Open meeting - Pledge of Allegiance
Approve agenda, with any amendments
*Consent Agenda
*A. Approve minutes: March 9, 2004
*B. Approve payment of claims
*C. Approve set-up license for Al & Alma's Supper Club
*D. Approve request for imprest funds increase
*E. Approve resolution approving subdivision exemption for 2354
Wilshire Boulevard for Lot 3, Bock 2, Shirley Hills unit F
*F. Approve special meeting with stafffor disaster training: April 29, 6:30p.m.
Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the
agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.)
Action on resolution finding no relationship with comprehensive plan
as it pertains to the Xcel land exchange
Action on resolution finding no relationship with comprehensive plan
as it pertains to the Custer purchase agreement
Visit from Senator Gen Olson
2003 Assessment Report by Phil Jenson, Hennepin County Assessor
Page
746-749
750-773
774
775-776
777-779
780-781
782-783
784-804
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Information/Miscellaneous
A. Correspondence: LMCD 805-822
B. LMC Friday Fax 823-829
C. Letter: Bond rating increase by Standard & Poors 830-833
D. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative 834-837
E. Report: Finance Department - Feb 2004 838-840
F. Letter: Public Hearing at Hennepin County on railroad encroachments 841
G. Minutes: DCAC -Mar 18, 2004 842-843
10. Adjourn
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More
current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. ci~_ ofmound, com.
COUNCIL BRIEFING
March 23, 2004'
iUpcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
Mar 23 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Mar 23 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Mar 29 - 7:00 - PC/CC joint meeting
Mar 30 - 6:30 - Annual Reports
Apr 1 - 6:30-9:00 - Harbor Wine and Spirits Wine Tasting Benefit for Public Safety
Apr 13 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Apr 13 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Apr 27 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting
Apr 27 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting
Apr 29 - 6:30 - Disaster training
May 15 - 8:00-3:00- Recycling Day
Upcoming Absences
May 12-14 Kandis Hanson
City Manager's Conf
Remodeling/Space Reorganization
Everyone is now relocated into their new work spaces, with just the finishing touches left to do. I will do a tour
of the building for those who wish to stay after the meeting. We will hold an open house for the newly
remodeled City Hall some time in the future.
Wine Tasting
We have still only sold about 100 tickets to the wine tasting on April 1. Please buy your tickets now and help
promote this new event. It is the basis for a wine tasting club that will grow our wine business and, increase the
profits that will reduce Mound taxes. Thank you for your help.
Disaster Training
The Mayor and Council will be included in the last of a series of trainings on security and disaster management.
Please see the following schedule:
April 2 - 10:00-2:00 - Disaster Training for Supervisors - Part I
April 15 - 2:00-4:00 - Safety and Security Training for all staff (required)
April 23 - 10:00-12:00 - Disaster Training for Supervisors - Part II
April 29 - 4:30-6:30 - Disaster Training for Supervisors - Part III
April 29 - 6:30-8:30 - Disaster Training for Supervisors, Mayor and Council Members
Bond Rating Increase
Once again, as last year, and without any solicitation, the City of Mound has had its bond rating increased!
Everyone has been a party to our sound financial practices and all should be proud of this accomplishment!
Congrats!
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
MARCH 9, 2004
The City council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County; Minnesota, met in regular
session on TuesdaY, Marc~, 9, 2004, at 7:30 p'.m. inthe coUncil chambers of citY hall.
Members present: Acting Mayor'Mark Hanus, C0uncilmembers David Osmek and Peter
Meyer.
Members Absent: Mayor Pat Meisel and Councilme~ber Bob Brown.
Others Present: City Attomey John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk
Bonnie Ritterl Community.DeveloPment Director sarah Smith, City Engineer John
Cameron, Public Works Director Cadton Moore, Bryan OakleY, Adam Parker, Fire
Chief Greg Pederson, Pete Norton, Bill Paulihg.
Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in
nature and will be enacted by a single ro/ICall vote. There will be no separate'
discussion on these items unless a CounCilmember or citizen so reguests. In that event
the item will be removed from the ConSent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. Open:'Meefinl3 -. Pled~3e of AIle~liance
Acti'~g .May°r H'a~nus Called the;meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance;' ,'
2. Appr'~ve A~e'hda. -
Actin~:MaY0t'~haS requested the addition of 6A, Wa{er Towe¢ oh Chateau Lane:
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Meyer to approve the agenda with the addition of 6A
as requested. All'v0ted in favor. Mdti0n carried.
3. Consent ARenda
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus tO approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call
vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approveminates of FebruarY24, 20'04.
B. ~APPr°ve' Pa~h~tof'ctairna'' in"the~°Unt~ of $~3'~9,853.56..~ ·
C, Ap~prOV~ p~Jlc.~therihg:.~ ~d~~Fis~e~: ~n.':~or bass'~:Ournament weigh-~in at
Centerview Beach.
D. RESOLUTION NO. 04-34: RESOLUTION .~.OMBINING PRECINCT 2 AND,
PRECINCT: 4 INTO ONE PRE~iN~T, TO~,'~N~' pRrECi"N~;r 214.
4. Comments & SU¢i~eSflons from~ Citizens'Present on AnY Item Not on thc
Agenda. - None were offered. -
1
-746-
Mound Coun(~l/Min,utes - Mard~
S. 2003-2004 Storm Water Pollution PreVention pr°gram Annual Meeflna
Carlton Moore informed the Council that in2003, Staff prepared and submitted the
Mound Sto.rrnwater Pollution Prevention Program to the MPCA to satisfy compliance
with the NatiOnal PollutiOn DiScharge Elimination System Phase II Permit for the City.
The intent of the Phase II program is to .encourage and require cities to reduce or
control the amount of stormwater runOff both in the form of water quality and rate
control. The meeting tonight constitutes the annual meeting that is required with the
submittal of an annual report to the MPCA. Public notice was published in the Laker on
February 7, 2004.
MOTION bY O~?,ek, seconded by Hanus to. approve.the 2003/2004 Storm Water
Pollution Prevention program Annual'Report, noting there were no comments from
Council or public'testimony offered at th~ ann'Ual meeting~ All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
5. Encfin~r,s Rep°rt on Well.:~PUmp H°usa .
John Camei~0r~ inti~bdu'~d ~B~an Oakley: frO.m MFRA, wh° requested authorization to
develop plans and'~pe~ific~tiOns for~the Well .~8 pump h~use+ He stated that decisions
made du~i~ the desig~ of:the PUmp house may impa~ future options for water
treatment, and reviewed these options. The water.treatment woBId: notbe~a~te~: ·
softening.pla~t, b~t.~mo~e iron and. mang~,eS~: b~b:~e:~ g~s
system's: ~MeY6t''exp~a~::con~:m~that th~ ~ameni~ level. in one well periodi~i'iy ' .
ex~s the upcomi~ EPA standard and Oakley inform~ him that this ~uld be
resolved by tma~ent, but the m~t ~st effe~ive solution is well manage~en.t~an~ .... ·
blending..Discus~pn, fo!lowed.regarding the thr~ options, spelled out ~='~'akl~;S.i~ffer
to the C~U~Cil d~d: ua~h'3, 20~'.':~ ~
MOTION b~o~mek; s6c°naed::by"Nanus tOo[der P!ans and speci~ti~ns for~the ~ell
~8 pump house, making sum it is designed for the capabili~ of expansion in the futura
to a~mmodate water treatment. The following v~ed in favor: Osmek and H:anu~:~
The following voted against: Meyer. Motion ~rHed ...... ~:
6A. Wa~r Tower on Cha~au Lane
John Cameron info~ the Council of con~rn pv~r m~pstr~jng. Ch~au .Lane~in
the 20~ Street Proje~, and th.en :~ming in ~e~.Y~a[ ~, he~W eq~pme~t~..tobuiB~:~the
Osmek asE~d if it ;b~' A~. S~.~etoell,~te Fai ieW,, om 'th,s .years proje~ als0',
bemuse they arC'ih the:':sa~':~i~i~:: ~a~&n stAed:'t~at FaiWie~ does need repair,
as does Chateau, butE wouldn't hu~ an~bi~g to.delay.them both:for one
MOTION by Osmek, seconded byHanus to remove Chateau Lane and Fai~iew Lane
from the 20~ Street Reconstm~ion project, due to ~n~m over coordination with the
Chateau Lane water tower ~nstm~ion. All voted' in favor. Motion carried.
2
-747-
Mound City Council Minutes- IVlarch §, 2004
It was noted that MFRA will come back in the heal, future to request' that a'preliminary
study be done on the Chateau Lane water tower,' so'that cOnstruction can begin 'in the
Fall/VVinter of.2004/2005.
7. Fire Department:
A. Resolution of Appreciation for Con.qressman John Kline for Securin.c]
.$250,000 of Funds for Clean-up of the WAFTA Site
Fire Chief Greg Pederson gave a brief history o WAFTA and the plans for the site
clean-up in Watertown Township. He informed the Council that John KHne was
instrumental in securing $250,000 in federal funding to help with the clean-up
project.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. Ail
voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-35: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR
CONGRESSMAN JOHN KLINE
B. Joint and Cooperative Use of Fire Personnel and Equipment
Fire Chief Greg Ped:erson presented the Jointand Cooperative Use of Fire
Personnel and Equipment agreement to the Council for their consideration.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to adopt the following resolution. Ali
voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-36: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT
FOR JO!NT AND COOPERATIVE USE OF FIRE PERSONNEL AND
EQUIPMENT
8A. Action on Subdivision Exemption - Lot 3., Block 2~ ShirleyHillS,. Unit F
Sarah Smith stated 'that a provision was put in the City Code about nine month~ ago
that provides for a "Subdivision Exemption". This request falls under this new proVision.
Discussion followed regarding the particulars of this request.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Hanus to direct staff to prepare a resolution for
consideration at the next meeting, that is in compliance with the Subdivision Exemption
clause of the City Code as it relates to this request. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
8B. Action on Joint Planning Commission/City Council Workshop
MOTi:0'N by Osmek, seconded bY Hanus to set a special joint Pianning
· Commission/City Council workshop for March 29, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. at city hall. Meyer
stated he is voting against this, because he will be unable to attend this meeting, and
the schedules of the two absent members are not known. The following voted in favor:
Osmek and Hanus. The following voted against: Meyer. Motion carried.
-748-
Mound Ci¥ Council-Minutes -March 9, 2004
9. CommunityDevelopment Director,S.Update ·
Sarah Smith presented an update to the Council that included the current status .of:
MCWD Rule M Buffer Proposed Amendment; HCRRA Railroad Corridor Abandonment
Process; Joint PC/CC Workshop set for March 29; Langdon Trails; Langdon Bay;
Mound MarketPlace; Village By the Bay; Mound Harbor Renaissance Development; and
CSAH 15.
10. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Minutes: Planning Commission - March 11, 2004
B. Newsletter: Metropolitan Council ·
C. Report: Harbor Wine & Spirits
D. Newsletter- Gillespie Center
E. LMC -Friday Fax.
F. Calendar: LMCC
G. Correspondence: LMCD
H. Newsletter- Lake Minnetonka Association
1. Minutes: DCAC - February 19, 2004
11. Adjourn
MOTION byOsmek, seconded by Meyer to adjourn the meeting at 9:07 p.m. All voted
in favor. Motion carried,
Attest: Bonnie Ritter; Ci~,,Clerk
Acting Mayor Mark Hanus: ' '.
4
-749-
MARCH 23, 2004 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
031004SU E $1,272.31 MAR
031204SUE $3,433.72 MAR
031704SUE $10,412.87 MAR
032304SUE $208,235.68MAR
TOTAL
$223,354.58
-750-
CiTY OF MOUND
Batch Name
031004SUE
Payments
City of Mound 03/10/04 9:54 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: March 2004
User Dollar Amt $1,272.31
Computer Dollar Amt $1,272.31
Refer 31004 DRIVER AND VEHICLE SERVICES
$0.00 In Balance
Cash Payment E 101-43100-438 Licenses and Taxes TAX EXEMPT PLATE $18.00
Invoice 031904 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-438 Licenses and Taxes TAX EXEMPT PLATE $4.50
Invoice 031904 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 602-49450-438 Licenses and Taxes TAX EXEMPT PLATE $4.50
invoice 031904 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $27.00
Refer 31004 FACKLER, JAMES
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $95.44
Invoice 031004 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.44
Refer 31004 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl
Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 01-19-04 THRU 02-18-04 CELL PHONES $430.87
Invoice 031004 3/19/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $430.87
Refer 31004 NICCUM, DANIEL
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 REIMBURSE MEDICAL EXPENSE $59.00
Invoice 031004 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.00
Refer 31004 SHERBURN COUNTY COURTHOU
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow 04-0520 #7123 WT#W04073 $300,00
Invoice 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Due 3/8/2004 Wefts Fargo 10100 Total $300.00
Refer 31004 ST. LOUIS COUNTY SHERRIFF
Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow #04-0520 #7123 WT #2040073 $300.00
Invoice 031004 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00
Refer 31004 TRI-COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT
Cash Payment E 101-42110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 MEMBERSHIP DUES $60.00
Invoice 031004 3/10/2004 PO 18158
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.00
-751 -
CiTY OF MOUND
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
City of Mound 03/10/04 9:54 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: March 2004
10100 Wells Fargo
$1,263.31
$4.5O
$4.50
$1,272.31
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$1,272.31
$1,272.31
-752-
C~TY OF MOUND
Batch Name 031204SUE
Payments
City of Mound 03/12/04 1:21 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: March 2004
User Dollar Amt $3,433.72
Computer Dollar Amt $3,433.72
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 31204 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH
Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than B~ WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT
Invoice 031204 3/12/2004
Transaction Date 3/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100
$150.00
Total $150.00
Refer 31204 SMITH, SARAH
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $291.72
Invoice 031204 3/t2/2004
Transaction Date 3/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $291.72
Refer 31204 VERNON S. HOIUM AND NANCY W
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs RETAINING WALL 5510 LYNWOOD $2,992.00
Invoice 031204 3/12/2004
Transaction Date 3/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,992.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND $291.72
455 TIF 1-2 $2,992.00
601 WATER FUND $150.00
$3,433.72
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$0.00
$3,433.72
$3,433.72
-753-
C~TY OF MOUND
Batch Name
City of Mound 03/19/04 8:06 AM
Page 1
Payments
031704SUE
Payment Computer Dollar Amt $10,412,87 Posted
Refer 31704 XCEL ENERGY Ck# 014205 3/17/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 STREET LIGHTS $5,075.22
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,075.22
Refer 31704 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Ck# 014196 3/17/2004
Cash Payment 02-04 472-0635 $349.89
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment 02-04 472-0648 $461.28
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment 02-04 472-0635 $349.90
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment 02-04 472-0635 $349.90
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,510.97
Refer 31704 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Ck# 014200 3/17/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training CERTIFICATION CLASS D, WlDMER $23.00
Invoice 031704 PO 18257
Fransaction Date 3/12/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.00
Refer 31704 VERIZON WIRELESS (FIRE~FIN) Ck# 014203 3/17/2004
E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 02-04 952-240-5244 $47.16
Cash Payment
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date
E 602-49450o321 Telephone & Ceils
E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells
E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells
E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells
$10.15
E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Ceils 02-04 612-269-9058
$10.15
E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 02-04 612-875-4502
E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells
G 101-22816 Personal Cell Phone
E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells
E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells
3/15/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.46
Refer 31704 VERIZON WIRELESS (P/W) Ck# 014204 3/17/2004
Cash Payment 02-04 CELL PHONES $63.90
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment 02-04 CELL PHONES $529.38
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment 02-04 CELL PHONES $127.80
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment 02-04 CELL PHONES $63.90
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $784.98
Refer 31704 CARBONE'S PIZZA Ck# 014195 3/17/2004
Cash Paymen[ G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow EE APPRECIATION $660.00
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $660.00
Refer 31704 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CIITES Ck# 014198 3/1712004
Sash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training SAFETY/LOSS REGISTRATION $20.00
Invoice 031704 PO 18160
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00
-754-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
03/19/04 8:06 AM
Page 2
Refer 31704 MEDINA ENTERTAINMENT CENTE Ck# 014199 3/17/2004
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training PLEAA TRAINING HAWKS $20.00
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training PLEAA TRAINING DEBORD $20.00
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $40.00
Refer 31704 SPEEDWAYSUPERAMERICA (POL Ck# 014202 3/17/2004
Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 02-22-04 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,350.27
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $t,350.27
Refer 31704 MOUND POST OFFICE Ck# 014201 3/17/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $128.99
Invoice 031704
Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $128.98
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $257.97
Refer 31704 GRADY, DANIEL Ck# 014197 3/17/2004
Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2004 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $623.00
Invoice 031704
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $623~00
Fund Summary BATCH Total $10,412.87
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$8,832.88
$10.15
$565.79
$542.77
$461.28
$10,412.87
Pre-Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$10,412.87
$0.00
$10,412.87
-755-
CITY OF [~OUND
Batch Name 032304SUE
Payments
Refer 3D SPECIALTIES
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 1
Payments
User Dollar Amt $208,235.68
Computer Dollar Amt $208,235.68
$0.00 In Balance
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms WINTER COATS $739.35
Invoice 415325 3/5/2004 PO 17475
Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms WINTER COATS $295.74
Invoice 415325 3/5/2004 PO 17475
Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms WINTER COATS $443.61
Invoice 415325 3/5/2004 PO 17475
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,478.70
Refer 32304 ACTION RADIO AND COMMUNICA
Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA ATV SETUP $548.42
Invoice 2817 2/27/2004 PO 18142
Cash Payment E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA #845 TEARDOWN/BUILD UP $337.34
Invoice 2823 3/1/2004 PO 18129
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $885.76
Refer 32304 ADVANCED GRAPHIX, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery ATV LETTERING $31.02
' "nvoice 7337 2/26/2004 PO 18151
'Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.02
Refer 32304 AMERICAN RED CROSS MPLS AR
Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves CPR MATERIAL $143.80
Invoice 67442 2/27/2004 PO 17813
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $143.80
Refer 32304 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $42.84
Invoice 463407012 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.84
Refer 32304 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG
Cash Payment E 101-41500-218 Clothing and Uniforms LOGO EMBROIDER,BUSINARO $29.84
Invoice 030804 3/8/2004
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29.84
Refer 32304 ASSET RECOVERY CORPORA TIO
Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services RECYCLING SERVICES $523.75
Invoice 635539 3/8/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $523.75
Refer 32304 AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA
Cash Payment E 101-41110-210 Operating Supplies 02-04 WATER $121.09 .
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $121.09
,-~ ,Refer 32304 BELLBOY CORPORATION
,~ash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,441.40
Invoice 28886100 3/8/2004
-756-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 2
Payments
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE
Invoice 38186000 3/12/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 28934000 3/12/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 28941600 3/15/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
invoice 28875300 3/4/2004
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo
$29.60
$564.06
$1,106.11
$792.50
10100 Total $3,933.67
Refer 32304 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-42400-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE $8.50
Invoice 403518 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous COFFEE $4.25
Invoice 403518 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE $21.25
Invoice 403518 3/3/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $34.00
Refer 32304 BFI OF MINNESOTA, INC.
Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 02-04 #1-0429-8003980-0240200 $19.42
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 02-04 #1-0429-8003972-040200 $22.15
Invoice 032304 3/23/2003
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $41.57
Refer 32304 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUP
Cash Payment E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies BULBS $24.07
Invoice 93538290 2/27/2004 PO 18253
Cash Payment E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies BULBS $24.07
Invoice 93538290 2/27/2004 PO 18253
Cash Payment E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies BULBS $24.07
Invoice 93538290 2/27/2004 PO 18253
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.21
Refer 32304 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS
Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 3/4 MINUS (CL 2) $359.13
Invoice 032304 2/29/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $359.13
Refer 32304 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREN T
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training $125.00
invoice 1165 3/2/2004 PO 18135
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training $125.00
Invoice 1165 3/2/2004 PO 18135
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training $125.00
Invoice 1165 3/2/2004 PO 18135
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training $125.00
Invoice 1t65 3/2/2004 PO 18135
Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training $180,00
Invoice 1036 3/9/2004 PO 18162
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $680.00
02-24-04 CONFERENCE KURTZ
02-24-04 CONFERENCE McKINLEY
02-24-04 CONFERENCE NICCUM
02-24-04 CONFERENCE SWANSON
01-13-04 TRAINING BECK
-757-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
Current Period: March 2004
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 3
Refer 32304 CAT AND FIDDLE BEVERAGE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $301.00
Invoice 38587 3/5/2004
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $301.00
Refer 32304 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 01-20-04 THRU 02-18-04 #543-000-053-000 $426.99
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 01-20-04 THRU 02-18-04 #543-001-095-800 $1,002.73
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 01-20-04 THRU 02-18-04 #543-001-833-500 $849.27
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 01-20-04 THRU 02-18-04 #543-001-853-000 $1,823.37
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 01-20-04 THRU 02-18-04 #543-001-972-603 $859.21
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 01-20-04 THRU 02-18-04 #543-001-972-603 $468.66
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 01-20-04 THRU 02-18-04 #543-001-972-603 $624.88
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,055.11
Refer 32304 CHADWICK AND MERTZ
' Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 02-04 PROSECUTION $5,003.12
Invoice 032304 3/3/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,003.12
Refer 32304 CHAMPION AUTO
Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WIRE $44.72
Invoice D246270 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MUD FLAPS $42.58
Invoice D246055 3/1/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $87.30
Refer 32304 CONTRACT RESOURCE SERVICE
Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA REPLACE CARPET 2ND FLOOR $6,494.00
Invoice 24430 3/4/2004 PO 18036
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,494.00
Refer 32304 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 02-04 COPY MAINTENANCE $340.80
Invoice 45164 3/4/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $340.80
Refer 32304 COPYMED, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies MEDICAL RECORDS $28.94
Invoice 1216182 2/5/2004 PO 18156
Transaction Date 3/18/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $28.94
Refer 32304 CUSTOM REMODELERS, INCORP
';ash Payment R 101-32210 Building Permits REFUND PERMIT FEE $31.40
'Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.40
-758-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
Current Period: March 2004
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 4
Refer 32304 DAS, RAJIVE
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND LIGHT FEE $10.50
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.50
Refer 32304 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply WATER METER $202.82
Invoice 3214546 2/12/2004 PO 18240
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $202.82
Refer 32304 DA Y DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,332.10
Invoice 255641 3/9/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $680.30
Invoice 251371 1/28/2004
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,012.40
Refer 32304 DEREGNIER, DAVID
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND OVERPAYMENT $42.50
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.50
Refer 32304 E-Z RECYCLING
Cash Payment E 670-49500-440 Other Contractual Servic 03-04 CURBSIDE RECYCLING $6,326.48
~nvoice 6324 3/2/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,326.48
Refer 32304 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,519.25
Invoice 221905 3/8/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $75.50
Invoice 513394 3/11/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $151.00
Invoice 513393 3/11/2004
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2.745,75
Refer 32304 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 PROJECT MANAGEMENT $1,125.00
Invoice 21904 3/10/2004
Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 02-04 MOUND HARBOR RENASIANNCE $1,275.00
Invoice 21905 3/10/2004
Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 02-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISANNCE $225.00
invoice 21903 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,625.00
Refer 32304 ESS BROTHERS AND SONS, INCO
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies CI ADJ RING $911.64
Invoice GG1083 3/4/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $911.64
Refer 32304 EXPERIAN PURCHASE ORDER SE
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies MPLS COLE DIRECTORY $299.95
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004 PO 18163
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $299.95
-759-
CITY OF i~OUND
Refer
Cash Payment
Invoice 0028087
Cash Payment
Invoice 0028544
Cash Payment
Invoice 0029381
Transaction Date
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 5
Payments
32304 EXPRESS POLICE SUPPLY
E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA #845 LIGHTING
2/9/2004 PO 18132
E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA ATV LIGHTING
2/16/2004 PO 18143
E 101-42110-500 Capital Outlay (GENERA #845 LIGHTING
2/26/2004 PO 18143
3/9/2004 Wells Fargo
$1,133.84
$579.94
$59.99
10100 Total $1,773.77
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Cash Payment
invoice 032304
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Transaction Date
Refer 32304 EXTREME BEVERA GE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $64.00
Invoice 183267 2/26/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.00
Refer 32304 FILING SPECIALTIES
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies MUG FOLDERS $110.75
Invoice 5475 2/19/2004 PO 18153
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $110.75
Refer 32304 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA
E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 01-04 472-0600 $1,168.78
3/23/2004
E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 01-04 472-0600 $486.99
3/23/2004
E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 01-04 472-0600 $292.20
3/23/2004
E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 02-04 472-0600 $1,151.12
3/23/2004
E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 01-04 472-0600 $479.64
3/23/2004
E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 01-04 472-0600 $287.78
3/23/2004
E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 03-04 472-0646 $i9.58
3/10/2004
E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells CREDIT 472-0600 -$15.88
3/10/2004
3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,870.21
Refer 32304 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms
Invoice 6851857
Cash Payment
Invoice 6851857
Cash Payment
Invoice 6851857
Cash Payment
Invoice 6851857
Cash Payment
Invoice 6851857
.;ash Payment
Invoice 6851857
E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms
E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials
E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials
E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials
03-02-04 UNIFORMS $32.76
03-02-04 UNIFORMS $32.76
03-02-04 UNIFORMS $32.75
03-02-04 MATS $28,63
03-02-04 MATS $28.63
03-02-04 MATS $26.63
-760-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies
Invoice 6851846
Cash Payment E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services
Invoice 6851847
Transaction Date 3/16/2004
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 6
Payments
Current Period: March 2004
03-02-04 MATS $91.49
03-02-04 MATS $52.49
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $326.14
Refer 32304 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE
Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #16 ENGINE NOISE $296.46
invoice 62484 1/29/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $296.46
Refer 32304 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD
Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 02-0 WATER SERVICE $5.03
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 02-04 WATER SERVICE $5.03
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 02-04 WATER SERVICE $5.03
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies 02-04 WATER SERVICE $62.66
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.75
Refer 32304 GME CONSULTANTS
Cash Payment E 455-43104-300 Professional Srvs 2004 STREET IMPROVEMENT $4,432.00
Invoice 19048 3/4/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,432.00
Refer 32304 GRAND PERE WINES, INCORPOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $89.50
invoice 00013277 3/4/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $69,50
Refer 32304 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $293.60
Invoice 855745 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,776.11
Invoice 855744 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,817.93
Invoice 852143 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $458.10
Invoice 852155 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $42.25
invoice 852154 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CREDIT-MERCHANDISE -$16.50
Invoice 834231 3/2/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$18.91
Invoice 633957 2/26/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,236.92
Invoice 858901 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $84.00
Invoice 858902 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,020.65
Invoice 858903 3/10/2004
-761 -
CITY OF MOUND
Transaction Date 3/12/2004
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 7
Payments
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,694.15
Refer 32304 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts CONNECTORS FOR SWEEPER $125.50
Invoice 50325 2/17/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts #4 PIPE $22.04
invoice 50289 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Pads #20 HYD HOSE $102.86
Invoice 50326 2/20/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts BROOM ANGLE $4.26
Invoice 50251 2/12/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $254.66
Refer 32304 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMA TIO
Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals 02-04 RADIO LEASE $1,288.38
Invoice 24028023 2/29/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,288.38
Refer 32304 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs CTY RD 15 BLDG REMOVAL $4,139.02
Invoice 022304 2/25/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,139.02
Refer 32304 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $99.80
invoice 326016 3/8/2004
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.80
Refer 32304 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I
Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $2,290.73
Invoice 032304 3/912004
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 CR 15 STREETSCAPE $2,208.50
Invoice 032304 3/9/2004
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 MISC PLANNING $318.75
Invoice 032304 3/9/2004
Cash Payment G 101-22957 2420 Westedge #03-37 Horn 02-04 HOMOLA #03-39 SUBDIVISION $63.75
Invoice 032304 3/9/2004
Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 02-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $1,652.99
Invoice 032304 3/9/2004
Cash Payment E 455-4.6377-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 TIF RELATED WORK $2,003.75
Invoice 032304 3/9/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,538.47
Refer 32304 INVENSYS METERING SYSTEMS
Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 2004 SYSTEM SUPPORT $1,000.00
Invoice ZZ40025509 2/26/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00
Refer 32304 ISLAND PARK SKELLY
Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 1993 PICKUP REPAIRS $125.56
nvoice 15459 2/5/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WIPER BLADES $73.02
Invoice 15516 2/11/2004
-762-
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 15516
Cash Payment
Invoice 15516
Cash Payment
Invoice 15630
Transaction Date
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 8
Payments
E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WIPER BLADES
2/11/2004
E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery WIPER BLADES
2/11/2004
E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery STARTER CIRCUIT ON C3500
3/2/2004
3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100
$73.02
$73.02
$38,00
Total $382.62
Refer 32304 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 101-41110-350 Printing SPRING NEWSLETTER $1,489.94
Invoice 48933 2/27/2004
Transaction Date 3/9~2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,489.94
Refer 32304 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $273.00
Invoice 1692727 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $308.85
Invoice 1692726 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $667.59
Invoice 1692725 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $897.25
Invoice 1686485 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $301.75
Invoice 168486 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $563.16
Invoice 1686487 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $589.93
Invoice 1686488 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,254.40
Invoice 1689630 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $263.20
Invoice 1689631 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $29.99
Invoice 1689632 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $115.80
Invoice 1689633 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $130.50
Invoice 1689634 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$6,56
invoice 1461247-B 1/2/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDiT-LIQUOR -$135,00
Invoice 9018507 8/18/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$41.60
Invoice 1648719-B 12/4/2003
Cash Payment E 609-4-9750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$1.196.30
Invoice 1623268-B 12/24/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR -$16.78
Invoice 244989 2/24/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$4.00
Invoice 244990 2/24/2004
-763-
C~TY OF MOUND
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 9
Payments
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT--WINE -$4.66
Invoice 245160 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$9.64
Invoice 245161 2~25~2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$93.24
Invoice 245639 31212004
Transaction Date 311212004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,887.64
Refer 32304 JUBILEE FOODS
Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 03-10-04 COUNCIL COOKIES $43.17
Invoice 032304 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 03-17-04 COUNCIL COOKIES $38,63
Invoice 032304 3/17/2004
Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 02-12-04 COUNCIL COOKIES $11.47
Invoice 032304 2/12/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $93.27
Refer 32304 KUEHN, JAMES
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND SHARE FEE $100.00
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD SHARE $7.50
~.~...., Invoice 032304 3~23~2004
transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107.50
Refer 32304 LAKESHORE WEEKL Y NEWS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising ADVERTISING $199.50
Invoice 00104224 3/9/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $199.50
Refer 32304 LANDON, TODD
Cash Payment R 281-34725 Dock Permits REFUND SHARE FEE $100.00
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment R 281-34705 LMCD Fees REFUND LMCD FEE $11.25
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.25
Refer 32304 LATCHAM, TOM
Cash Payment G 101-22962 4711 Islandview Dr #03-45 V REFUND ESCROW $500.00
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.00
Refer 32304 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts FUSE $17.10
Invoice 1760711 2/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101.45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery FUSE BLOCK $148.01
Invoice 1777931 2/27/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165.11
Refer 32305 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CIITES
....... Cash Payment E 101-41110-434 Conference & Training 2004 STATE CITIES,MEYER $70.00
nvoice 1-0000016283 3/23/2004
'Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.00
Refer 32304 MADDEN, FRANK AND ASSOClA T
-764-
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
~,~t~ .............. '" Page 10
/ ~,~,,~ ~. _ Payments
//
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 032304
Transaction Date
E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $503.50
3/1/2004
3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $503.50
Cash Payment
Invoice 645209
Cash Payment
Invoice 645210
Cash Payment
Invoice 64521
Cash Payment
Invoice 642861
Cash Payment
Invoice 642663
Cash Payment
Invoice 642862
Transaction Date
Refer 32304 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,419.85
3/16/2004
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.95
3/16/2004
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $39.00
3/16/2004
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $975.15
3/9/2004
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $32~00
3/9/2004
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $37.30
3/9/2004
3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,525,25
Refer 32304 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI
Cash Payment E 427-43121-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 2002 SEAL COAT PROJECT $103.00
Invoice 46860 3/1/2004 Project 06173
Cash Payment E 101~42400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 PLANNING MISC ENGINEERING $515.00
Invoice 46861 3/1/2004 Project 08901
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 ZONING MISC ENGINEERING $206.00
Invoice 46862 3/1/2004 Project 08902
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 WATER MISC ENGINEERING $25,75
Invoice 46863-A 3/1/2004 Project 08904
Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 SEWER MISC ENGINEERING $25.75
Invoice 46863-B 3/1/2004 Project 08904
Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT $154.50
Invoice 46864 3/1/2004 Project 12533
Cash Payment G 101-22854 Langdon Bay Major Sub-Divi 02-04 LANGDON BAY DEVELOPMENT $259.00
Invoice 46865 3/1/2004 Project 12754
Cash Payment E 455-43255-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 MCES LIFT STATION $652.90
Invoice 46866 3/1/2004 Project 13132
Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $103,00
Invoice 46867 3/1/2004 Project 13215
Cash Payment E 281-45210-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 DOCK LOCATION MAP $35.50
Invoice 46868 3/1/2004 Project 13223
Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 02-04 WELL/PUMPHOUSE $2,525.30
Invoice 46869 3/1/2004 Project 13313
Cash Payment G 101-22890 2957 Cambridge Retain Wall 02-04 SKAALERUD 2957 CAMBRIDGE $51.50
Invoice 46870 3/1/2004 Project 13501
Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 LOST LAKE/GREENWAY $2,211.80
Invoice 46871 3/1/2004 Project 13566
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT $51,50
Invoice 46872 3/1/2004 Project 13681
Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 02-04 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $309.00
Invoice 46873 3/1/2004 Project 13832
-765-
City of Mound 03/48/04 4:02 PM
~-' .................. ~"' Page 11
/ '~'-~ Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY $51.50
Invoice 46874 3/1/2004 Project 14000
Cash Payment E 401-43105-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 2003 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $987.30
Invoice 46875 3/1/2004 Project 14121
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 NPDES PHAS II MS4 PERMITTING $403.70
Invoice 46876 3/1/2004 Project 14137
Cash Payment G 101-22957 2420 Westedge #03-37 Hem 02-04 2420 WESTEDGE #03-39 $410.00
Invoice 46877 3/1/2004 Project 14550
Cash Payment G 101-22958 2175 Noble Ln #03-40,#03-4 02-04 2175 NOBLE LANE 03-40 $51.50
Invoice 46878 3/1/2004 Project 14556
Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $28,473.70
Invoice 46879 3/1/2004 Project 14615
Cash Payment G 101-22974 Bloomquist Hotel Developme 02-04 BLOOMQUIST HOTEL DEVELOPMENT $154.50
Invoice 46880 3/1/2004 Project 14669
Cash Payment G 101-22977 NSP Excel #04-01/#04-02 Va 02-04 XCEL SUB-STATION $103.00
Invoice 46881 3/1/2004 Project 14674
Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT $3,129.50
Invoice 46882 3/1/2004 Project 14702
Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $122.20
Invoice 46883 3/1/2004 Project 14707
Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 02-04 XCEL SUB-STATION $1,184.50
Invoice 46336 1/1/2004 Project 13190
Transaction Date 3/18/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42,300.90
Refer 32304 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR
Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste Disposal-MCIS 04-04 WASTEWATER $31,172.87
invoice 771020 3/5/2004
Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 02-04 SAC CHARGES $2,673.00
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $33,845.87
Refer 32304 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEM
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies LABELS/FOLDERS $643.84
Invoice 40926 1/23/2004 PO 18116
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $643.84
Refer 32304 MINNESOTA LABOR AND INDUST
Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 02-27-04 SERVICE CALL $20.00
Invoice 032304
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00
Refer 32304 MORAN USA, LLC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $222.00
Invoice 231026 3/3/2004
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $222.00
Refer 32305 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 03-04 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE $735.25
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
'ransaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $735.25
Refer 32304 MOUND, CITY OF
-766-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 12
Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004
Refer 32304
Cash Payment
Invoice 88661
Cash Payment
Invoice 88944
02-04 WATER/SEWER $23.62
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.62
MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 02-04-04 CONCRETE $1,149.95
2/5/2004
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 02-19-04 CONCRETE $992.79
2/20/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,142.74
Refer 32304 NATIONAL WATERWORKS
Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts PARTS, CLAMPS,ETC $546.62
Invoice 1083074 3/2/2004 PC) 18254
Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Pads PARTS, CLAMPS,ETC $37.88
Invoice 9912769-B
Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Pads PARTS, CLAMPS,ETC $37.88
Invoice 9912769-B
Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts PARTS, CLAMPS,ETC $37.87
Invoice 99212769-B
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $660.25
Refer 32304 NEWMAN SIGNS
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGNS $177.20
Invoice TI-0119269 2/26/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGNS $92.84
Invoice TI-0119316 2/27/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $270.04
Refer 32304 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO
Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 02-04 LOCATES $39.10
Invoice 4020555 2/29/2004
Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 02-04 LOCATES $39.10
Invoice 4020555 2/29/2004
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $78.20
Refer 32304 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $614.74
Invoice 8030655 3/15/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,038.98
Invoice 8030031 3/8/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,653.72
Refer 32304 PEDERSON, SARAH
Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous PHOTOGRAPHY $720.36
Invoice 032303 3/9/2004 PO 18164
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $720.36
Refer 32304 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $33.75
Invoice 2048649 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $140.45
Invoice 2048648 3/10/2004
-767-
City of Mound 03/18/04 4:02 PM
//.,.: ............. ~""~.~.~. Page 13
~ Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $571.10
Invoice 2043975 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,751.55
Invoice 2043976 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $369.40
Invoice 2046362 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$14.22
Invoice 3294711 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT--LIQUOR
Invoice 3295204 3/8/2004
Transaction Date 3/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,849.45
Refer 32304 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $76.95
Invoice 379598-00 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $213.29
Invoice 379597-00 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $344.13
Invoice 378992-00 3/10/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $t43.79
Invoice 373789-00 2/25/2004
~ ....Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $694.68
i ,Invoice 373830-00 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,128.92
Invoice 373540-00 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $154.23
Invoice 373534-00 2/25/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,258.98
Invoice 376207-00 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $50.31
Invoice 376205-00 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $83.59
Invoice 376260-00 3/3/2004
Transaction Date 3/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,148.87
Refer 32304 ROSTAD, JEANNE
Cash Payment R 101-34110 Depot Rental REFUND DEPOT FEE $75.00
Invoice 032303 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $75.00
Refer 32304 SBC MINNCOMM PAGING
Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells REPLACEMENT PAGER $35.96
Invoice 67200003043 3/1/2004
Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells REPLACEMENT PAGER $35.95
Invoice 67200003043 3/1/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $71.9I
Refer 32304 SHANLEY PAINTING
, ..... ~ash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay (GENI~RA PAINT OFFICES $1,150.00
;nvoice 1890 3/18/2004
Transaction Date 3/18/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,150,00
Refer 32304 SOS PRINTING
-768-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 14
Cash Payment E 101-41310-203 Printed Forms
Invoice 65208 2/24/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising
Invoice 65225 3/9/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo
Refer 32304 STRE/CHER'S
BUS CARDS HANSON $42.33
BID SHEETS WINE TASTING $79.88
10100 Total $122.21
Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program
Invoice 423801.2 3/212004 PO 18130
Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program
Invoice 424940.1 3/2/2004 PO 18130
Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program
Invoice 423801.1 3/2/2004 PO 18130
Transaction Date 3/9/2004
GUN BRACKET $276.85
CREDIT-GUN BRACKET -$276.85
GUN BRACKET $251,13
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $251.13
Refer 32304 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2004 MEMBERSHIP ASSESSMENT $300.00
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00
Refer 32304 SUN CONTRACTORS
Cash Payment E 101-42400-430 Miscellaneous LARSON PRINTING FASCIA $1,125.00
Invoice 5 1/13/2004
Transaction Date 3/12/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,125.00
Refer 32304 SWEEPER SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 1989 ELGIN PELICAN STREET SWEEPER $227.00
Invoice 5469 3/2/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $227.00
Refer 32304 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $64.00
Invoice 31337 3/8/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $248.00
Invoice 31423 3/15/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,596.15
Invoice 327468 3/15/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,331.00
Invoice 327467 3/10/2004
Transaction Date 3/9i2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,239.15
Refer 32304 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $17.31
Invoice 441284 2/29/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $17.31
Refer 32304 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP
Cash Payment E 101~41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS $81.86
Invoice 211219 2/5/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $81.86
Refer 32304 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $4.80
Invoice 421528-0
-769-
CiTY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 15
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421528-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421528-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421528-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421528-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421528-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421528-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421528-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420929-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420802-1 PO 18154
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420835-0 PO 18154
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
nvoice 420802-0 PO 18154
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422218-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420955-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420963-1
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420963-1
Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420963-1
Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies
,nvoice 422313-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422308-0
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
NEON DISK
BUBBLE MAILER
NEON DISK
BATTERY, ETC
CALCULATOR
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
INK JET CARTRIDGE
INK JET CARTRIDGE
INK JET CARTRIDGE
STIR STICKS
TONER CARTRIDGE
$4.80
$4.80
$4.80
$4.80
$1.60
$3.19
$3.2O
$9,37
$57.51
$9.37
$201.27
$11.02
$2.74
$2.74
$2.74
$2.74
$2.74
$0.91
$1.82
$1.82
$15.99
$15.99
$8.00
$2.93
$105.00
-770-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 16
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 422118-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420963-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420963-0
Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420963-0
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 418719-0-B
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421192-0 PO 18070
Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 609~49750-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 420776-0
Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies
Invoice 421874-0 PO 18071
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
INK JET CARTRIDGE
INK JET CARTRIDGE
INK JET CARTRIDGE
CREDIT-BUSINESS CARD
CREDIT-SHREDDER
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
$2.94
$2.94
$2.94
$2.94
$2.94
$1.01
$1.96
$1.96
$39.07
$39.07
$19.53
-$15.64
-$58.46
$16.35
$16.35
$16.35
$16.35
$16.35
$5.48
$10.90
$10.90
$28.76
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $667.68
Refer 32304 UNIFORMS LIMITED
Cash Payment G 222-22801 Deposits/Escrow BADGE SHIELD $724.73
Invoice 205371 12/31/2003
Cash Payment G 222-22801 Deposits/Escrow JACKETS $1,257.63
Invoice 205375 12/31/2003
-771 -
CITY OF MOUND
Cash Payment
Invoice 205374
Transaction Date
City of Mound
Payments
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 17
G 222~22801 Deposits/Escrow SHIRTS $1,192.49
12/31/2003
3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,174.85
Refer 32304 WA TERTOWN PARTS CENTER
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply OIL FILTERS $51.05
Invoice 365163 2/18/2004 PO 18243
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51.05
Refer 32304 WlDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 02-23-04 ASPEN ROAD $742.00
Invoice 438 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 02-27-04 BARTLETT REPAIR $1,378.00
Invoice 437 3/3/2004
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,120.00
Refer 32304 WINE COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $444.75
Invoice 23174-00 3/4/2003
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE -$17~34
Invoice 23574-00 3/9/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $427.41
Refer 32304 WINE DOCTOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $540.00
Invoice 2004-069 3/1/2004
Transaction Date 3/9/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $540.00
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $161.28
Invoice 91769 3/4/2004
Transaction Date 3/17/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $161.28
Refer 32304 WORLD CLASS WINES, INCORPO
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,192.25
Invoice 147237 3/3/2004
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$6.30
Invoice 146709-B 2/18/2004
Transaction Date 3/16/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,185.95
Refer 32304 XCEL ENERGY
Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electdc Utilities 02-04 #2245-301-939 $668.82
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #0466-607-223 $21.99
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #0217-606-329 $2,543.26
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #0047-005-229 $183.65
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #0864-508-832 $I 17.58
~nvoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #0864-508-832 $117.58
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
-772-
CITY OF MOUND
City of Mound
Payments
03/18/04 4:02 PM
Page 18
Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #0864-508-832 $117.57
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 602-49450-38! Electric Utilities 02-04 #0018-802-634 $1,497.65
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities 02-04 #0009-604-835 $333.38
Invoice 032304 3/23/2004
Transaction Date 3/15/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,601.48
Refer 32304 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials SOAP FOR WASHING $94.60
Invoice 57062841 2/26/2004 PO 18251
Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials SOAP FOR WASHING $94.60
Invoice 57062841 2/26/2004 PO 18251
Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials SOAP FOR WASHING $94.60
Invoice 57062841 2/26/2004 PO 18251
Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies FLOOR SQUEGEE,ETC $59.77
Invoice 57061711 2/19/2004 PO 18159
Transaction Date 3/8/2004 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $343.57
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
427 SEAL COAT FUND
455 TIF 1-2
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$44,233.20
$3,846.32
$339.03
$34,188.73
$103.00
$15,900.17
$14,126.30
$37,908.93
$48,739.77
$8,850.23
$208,235.68
Pre~Written Check
Checks to be Generated by the Compute
Total
$208,235.68
$o.o0
$208,235.68
-773-
ii iL IL ,L ,
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
March 15, 2004
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mayor and City Council
Bonnie Ritter
Set-up License (Consumption & Display)
Al & Alma's Supper Club Set-up License is up for renewal. License year runs April 1st
through March 31st. Approval is contingent upon all application forms, fees and
certificates of insurance being received.
printed on recycled paper
-774-
CITY OF MOUND
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www. cityofmound.com
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Mayor and Council
Gino Businaro, Finance Director/Treasurer
March 12, 2004
Request for Imprest Funds Increase
The Finance Department and the Planning & Inspection Department have imprest funds
for the purpose of making change and to make payments of proper claims as authorized
by Minnesota State Statute 412.271 Subd. 5. These imprest funds were established by the
Council to facilitate transactions in those departments.
We are asking the Council to allow these two departments to have the imprest funds
increased as follows:
From To
Finance Department
$175 $ 350
P&I Department $100 $ 200
The City Manager and I have reviewed the requests and, given the daily and weekly
activity taking place at these two sites, we are recommending Council to authorize the
increase of these imprest funds as requested by the Departments.
Cc: Kandis M. Hanson, City Manager
Minnesota Statutes 2003, 412.271
drawn that when signed by the treasurer in an appropriate space,
it becomes a check on the city depository. Such order-check may
have printed on its reverse side, above the space for
endorsement thereof by the payee, the following statement: "The
~dersigned payee, in endorsing this order-check, declares that
~ same is received in payment of a just and correct claim
against the city of .......... , and that no part of such claim
has heretofore been paid." When endorsed by the payee named in
the order-check, such statement shall operate and shall be
deemed sufficient as the required declaration of the claim. Any
order presented to the treasurer and not paid for want of funds
shall be so marked and paid in the order of its presentation
with interest from the date of presentation at the rate of five
percent or such lower rate as is fixed by the council prior to
its issuance.
Subd. 4. Immediate pasrment of claims. When payment
of a claim based on contract cannot be deferred until the next
council.meeting without loss to the city through forfeiture of
discount privileges or otherwise, it may be made iramediately if
the itemized claim is endorsed for payment by at least a
majority of all the members of the council. The claim shall be
acted upon formally at the next council meeting in the same
manner as if it had not been paid, and the earlier payment shall
not affect the right of the city or any taxpayer to challenge
the validity of the claim.
· 5 Imprest funds. The council may establish
one or more imprest funds for the payment in cash of any proper
claim against the city which it is impractical to pay in any
other manner, except that no claim for salary or personal
~penses of an officer or employee shall be paid from such
Ids. The council shall appoint a custodian of each such fund
who shall be responsible for its safekeeping and disbursement
according to law. Money for the operation of such fund shall be
~secured by a transfer from the general fund. A claim itemizing
.all the various demands for which disbursements have been made
from the fund shall be presented to the council at the next
council meeting after the.disbursements have been made. The
council shall act upon it as in the case of other claims and an
order shall be issued to the custodian for the amount allowed.
The custodian shall use the proceeds of the order to replenish
the fund; and if the council fails to approve the claim in full
for any sufficient reason, the custodian shall be personally
responsible for the difference.
Subd. 6. Independent boards, powers. Subdivisions 4
and 5 shall apply to any independent board or commission of the
city having authority to disburse funds without approval of the
council. In such case references in these subdivisions to the
council shall be considered to be to the board or commission and
the money for the fund may be secured from any undedicated fund
under its jurisdiction.
Subd. 7. Definition. For purposes of this section, a
"city administrative official" means a city manager,
administrator, treasurer, senior fiscal officer, clerk, or
clerk-treasurer.
Subd. 8. Delegation of authority for paying certain
~±aims. A city council, at its discretion, may delegate its
authority to pay certain claims made against the city to a city
administrative official. City councils opting to delegate their
authority to review claims before payment pursuant to this
Page 2 of 3
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/412/271 .html -776- 3/12/2004
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 04-
RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION REQUEST TO
SUBDIVIDE LOT 3, BLOCK 2, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT F
PID NO. 13-117-24-34-0086
WHEREAS, the applicants, Peter and Kathy Norton, own Lots 1 and 2, Block 2,
Shirley Hills Unit F, which is located at 2354 Wilshire Boulevard and recently
purchased Lot 3, Block 2, Shirley Hills Unit F from Frontier Communications
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, in January, a request was received from Hennepin County Property
Divisions to approve the lot split to divide Lot 3 from PID No. 13-117-24-34-0086
which is legally described as follows:
LOTS 3 THRU 15 INCL BLK2 INCL ADJ % OF VAC ALLEY
SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT F
; and
WHEREAS, Staff was unable to approve the proposed division from Hennepin as
it required subdivision approval by the City of Mound; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Chapter 330.10 (B), the applicants submitted
a waiver of platting application to combine Lot 3 with their existing parcel
however it was determined by Hennepin County that the lots cannot be combined
as Lots 1 and 2 are located in a Tax Increment Financing District (TIF) and Lot 3
is located outside of the current TIF boundary; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the TIF boundary will be amended in Fall 2003
at which time the boundary could be adjusted to include Lot 3; and
-777-
WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 330 was amended in 2003 to include a provision
entitled "Subdivision Exemption" which reads as follows:
"In any case in which compliance with City Code Chapter 330:10
Subparagraph A (Minor Boundary Adjustment) and City Code Chapter 330:10
Subparagraph B (Waiver of Platting) will result in an unnecessary hardship to
the property owner and the request is not contrary to the platting regulations,
the City Council may waive such compliance by adoption of a resolution to
that effect and the conveyance may then be recorded. The Council may, at
its option, refer such questions to the Planning Commission for
recommendation before action."
; and
WHEREAS, the addition of Lot 3 to the Norton property will make the property
conforming with regard to parking and minimum lot size; and
WHEREAS, at its March 10, 2004 meeting, the City Council reviewed the request
and determined that subdivision exemption approval was warranted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota as follows:
The City does hereby approve the subdivision exemption subject to the
following conditions:
Preparation of a cross easement for the driveway entrance and
drive aisle along Wilshire Boulevard to be reviewed by Staff
and executed by both property owners prior to recording at
Hennepin County. In the event there are municipal utilities in the
subject area(s) and public easements have not been
previously obtained or provided they are to be provided by the new
owner(s).
B. Payment of all consultant fees associated with the processing of
the request.
C. Lot 3 to be combined with Lots 1 & 2 at such time as the TIF
boundary is amended.
-778-
This subdivision exemption request is hereby approved for the
following described property:
Existing:
LOTS 3 THRU 15 INCL BLK 2 INCL ADJ % VAC ALLEY
SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT F
PID No. 13-117-24-34-0086
Proposed:
LOT 3, BLOCK 2 INCL ADJ % VAC ALLEY
SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT F
PID No. 13-117-24-34-0112
LOTS 4 THRU 15 INCL BLK 2 INCL ADJ % VAC ALLEY
SHIRLEY HILLS, UNIT F
PID No. 13-117-24-34-0113
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember
and seconded by Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted March 25, 2004
Pat Meisel, Mayor
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-779-
***FOR ADDITION TO~
CITY OF MOUND
lARCH 23, 2004.***
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MN 55364-1687
PH: (952) 472-0600
FAX: (952) 472-0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
March 23, 2004
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Mayor and City Council
Bonnie Ritter
Tree Removal and Treatment Licenses
The following have applied for Tree Removal and Treatment Licenses. License year is
April 1, 2004 through March 31,2005.
Approval is contingent upon receipt of all proper application forms, fees, and certificates
of insurance.
Amberwood, Inc., Mound
Emery's Tree Service, Delano
Rob's Tree Care, Watertown
Shorewood Tree Service, Watertown
Viking Land Tree Care, Rockford
Aaspen Tree Service, Wayzata
Ray's Tree Service, Maple Plain
Roger's Tree Service, Mound
Gullickson Tree Service, Mound
Bear Tree Care, Mound
Rainbow Tree Co., St. Louis Park
Shady Wood Tree Experts, Minnetonka
Tree Top Service, Delano
Legacy Tree Service, Maple Grove
Above Ground & Beyond, Mound
Stumpf's Tree Service, Pierz
Tall Timber Tree Experts, Wayzata
Asplundh Tree Co, Spring Lake Park
printed on recycled paper
CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis MN 55402
(612) 337-9300 telephone
(612) 337-9310 fax
http://www.kennedy-graven.com
MEMORANDUM
3/3/04
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Dean
Subject: Xcel Comprehensive Plan Resolution.
Minnesota Statutes Section 462.356 subd. 2 requires that a determination be made that
certain purchases or sales of land are either consistent with the municipal comprehensive plan, or
that the purchase or sale does not relate to the municipal comprehensive plan.
Mound has approved the exchange of certain tracts of land between Xcel Energy. The tracts
are within the same guide district under the Mound Comprehensive Plan, and consequently the
exchange does not impact on the Comprehensive Plan.
A resolution is attached for your consideration at the March 9 Council meeting. The
resolution makes the finding that the exchange does not impact the Mound Comprehensive Plan.
The referenced statute requires that the resolution be approved by 2/3rds vote of the Council.
If the Council determines that the Comprehensive Plan is impacted by the exchange, it can
refer the matter to the Planning Commission for a determination by it of whether the exchange is in
compliance with the Plan.
-780-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 04-
RESOLUTION FINDING NO RELATIONSHIP WITH
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
XCEL LAND EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, on or about December 9; 2004 the City'Council did approve a land exchange
agreement calling for the exchange of certain tracts of land owned by the City of Mound for
certain tracts of land owned by Xcel Energy (the "Exchange"); and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.356 subd.2 requires that certain
determinations regarding the Mound Comprehensive Plan be made in connection with the
Exchange; and
WHEREAS, the parcels involved in the exchange are all within the same guide area under
the Comprehensive Plan;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota that the Exchange does not impact on the Mound Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of March, 2004.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
JBD-244714v 1
MU220-6
-781 -
CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis MN 55402
(612) 337-9300 telephone
(612) 337-9310 fax
http://www.kennedy-graven.com
MEMORANDUM
3/3/O4
To: Mayor and Council
From: John Dean
Subject: Purchase of Custer Property/Comprehensive Plan.
Minnesota Statutes Section 462.356 subd. 2 requires that a determination be made that
certain purchases or sales of land are either consistent with the municipal comprehensive plan, or
that the purchase or sale does not relate to the municipal comprehensive plan.
The Mound HRA has approved the purchase of certain tracts of land from Ken and
Sally Custer. The Custers will continue to occupy and utilize the property as they have always done
until the property is ready to be sold to third parties. Consequently, the sale to the HRA does not
impact the Comprehensive.
A resolution is attached for your consideration at the March 9 Council meeting. The
resolution makes the finding that the Purchase does not impact the Mound Comprehensive Plan.
The referenced statute requires that the resolution be approved by 2/3rds vote of the Council.
If the Council determines that the Comprehensive Plan is impacted by the Purchase, it can
refer the matter to the Planning Commission for a determination by it of whether the Purchase is in
compliance with the Plan.
JBD-244769vl
MU220-2
-782-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 04-
RESOLUTION FINDING NO RELATIONSHIP WITH
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CUSTER PURCHASE AGREEMENT
............ WHEREA~,~OrF-o~a~t- Decemb e r ~ '2003?tl~Mou~nd=Ff~g a~d~d~veto~t-
Authority did approve a land a purchase agreement calling for the purchase of certain
tracts of land owned by the Kenneth and Sally Custer (the "Purchase"); and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.345 Subd. 2 requires that certain
determinations regarding the Mound Comprehensive Plan be made in connection with the
Purchase; and
WHEREAS, the parcels involved in the Purchase, will be devoted to the same use after
Purchase as they are currently devoted until such time as the parcels are sold by the HRA
to third parties.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound,
Minnesota that the Purchase does not impact on the Mound Comprehensive Plan.
Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of March 2004.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mayor Pat Meisel
JBD-244768vl
MU220-2
-783-
Ex ectations of Assessors in Henne in Count
November 13, 2003
Maintain the appropriate State Board of Assessors Designation and Licensor
levels for assessment jurisdiction.
Meet all assessment deadlines and follow all guidelines and procedures as set
per County Assessor.
Attend and participate at all Monthly HAM Meetings.
Attend and participate at the Assessment Information and Communication
Meetings.
Attend and participate at all "Residential Assessment Meetings".
Attend and participate at all "Commercial and Industrial Meetings".
Attend and participate at all "Apartment Meetings".
Attend and participate with other meetings, training sessions, and ' Office.
information sessions when offered by the Hennepin County Assessor s
Physically inspect and revalue ~, 20% of all real property and personal
property, as required by law, and timely submit appraisal cards for data
processing each assessment year.
Physically inspect and value all new construction, additions, and renovations
each assessment year and submit with initial asSessment posting.
Post values electronically to the assessment roll and transmit file in
prescribed format to Hennepin County.
Coordinate the submission of annual assessment with Hennepin County
Assessment Manager and Hennepin County Staff, including the timely
submission of assessment checklists.
Adjust the estimated market values on those properties not physically
inspected per sales analysis to meet minimum assessment levels each
assessment year.
Maintain and update the property characteristics of all property types,
including exempt property, in your jurisdictions data base and Hennepin
Counties Mainframe database. The expectation is that all cities with
populations under 30,000 use the Hennepin County CAA to value all
residential properties each assessment year. Value all exempt properties on
6-year cycle.
Maintain database of current and historic values and classifications.
-784- ~
,Expectations of Assessors in Hennepin County
Administer the homestead classification database including the maintenance of the
Social Security Number file.
Review your residential Certificates of Real Estate Value monthly and communicate
your concerns to ]:T Operations with the Assessors Office.
Submit to the Commercial Appraisal Supervisor the upcoming apartment,
commercial, industrial, and corresponding vacant land assessment in spreadsheet
format for review and approval prior to submitting the entire assessment.
(See attached Exhibit A for specific details)
Investigate and verify all Certificates of Real Estate Value (CRV) for the sales of
Apartment, Commercial, ]:ndustrial, and corresponding Land properties as per
Minnesota Department of Revenue Guidelines and report such findings to your
designated contact person in the Commercial Appraisal Section of the County
Assessors Office.
Verify ownership of qualifying property and track all Contiguous Indicators.
Maintain a contiguous ownership list noting primary ownership parcels and the
secondary parcels, which would have the "Yes" indicator through sales ownership
verification.
Maintain your subscription in the Assessor Commercial Exchange (ACE) and complete
all data exchanges in the ACE format in a timely matter.
Complete divisions and combinations in a timely manner throughout the assessment
year.
Coordinate the printing and mailing of valuation notices and homestead cards with
Hennepin County.
Conduct valuation reviews prior to Local Board of Appeal and Equalization.
Approximate dates: March through May.
Attend and participate in your Local Board of Appeal and Equalization. Per Board
requests perform all necessary review appraisals, Approximate dates: April :1 - May
31.
Be available to respond to property owners, general public, government officials,
county assessor staff, and others regarding assessment or appraisal issues and
inquires during regular business hours.
Administer the abatement process pursuant to Minnesota Statue 375.:192 (:1998).
Administer Limited Value Statue. (M. S. 273.:[:1 Subd. :lA)
Administer This Old House Statue. (M. S. 273.:L1 Subd. 16)
Administer Plat Law Statue. (M. S. 273.1:1 Subd. 14)
Forward all Minimum Assessment Agreements (MAA) to the County Assessor for
review and validation in a timely manner.
-785-
Ex ectations of Assessors in Henne in Count
Exhibit A
Specific requirements for all Apartment, Commercial, Industrial, and Corresponding
Vacant Land Property
· Submit your properties in spreadsheet format by city (Excel is preferred) with the
minimum data elements as listed below.
· One spreadsheet should contain the data elements for the property types; A, AX,
HF, HL, HR, and LA.
· A minimum of one spreadsheet should contain the data elements listed below for
the property types; C, CT, I, LC, LI, NH, NH, NP, SR, and U. These spreadsheets
should include all taxable real property and personal property account parcels.
Parcels that have billboards, cell towers, hangers, railroad leases, etc. should be
included in these spreadsheets.
· The city assessor will value the clubhouses on golf courses.
· The city assessor will value property type MH - Manufactured Home Parks. The
county for cities under 30,000 will value the actual manufactured home values
via a personal property account.
Minimum data elements for Apartment, Commercial, Industrial, and Corresponding
Vacant Land Property
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Property ID number
Project Name
Land Area
Construction Year
Use Code
Gross Building Area (GBA)
Net Rentable Area (NRA)
Number of Units (Apartments)
Number of Units (Nursing Homes, Hotel/Hotels, Marinas, etc)
2003 Total Value
2004 Property Type
2004 Land Value '-
2004 Building Value
2004 Total Value
2004 Land Value per Sq. Ft.
2004 Building Value per GBA or NRA
2004Total value per GBA or NRA
Percent Change 2004 over 2003 value
2004 Improvement amounts
Any sales information in past years (Sale Date and Sales Price)
Comments
· Other Information
1. 2003 Total Value of Property Type
2. 2004 Total Value of Property Type with new improvements
3. 2004 Total Value of Property Types with out new improvements
· Any other comments to assist the reviewer understand and explain what was
done to set the (2004) current year assessment.
-786- 3
MUNICIPALITY:
MOUND
CITY STATISTICS
DATE:
DATE OF REPORT:
10/8/2003
10/2/2002
130%
125%
20%
115%
110%
' o5%
0O%
Z
RESIDENTIAL GROVVTH CHART
95%
9O%
10/1/2002
STUDY PERIOD
--.-R
--,,- RL
X
,, DB
--- RZ
10/1/2003
R RI_ X Y DB RZ
MEDIAN: 89,20% 90.50% 88.40% 97.50% 88.60% 85.40%
MEAN: 88.40% 88.40% 87.50% 90.00% 88.60% 85,40%
COD: 10.3 9 13.9 13.1 0 0
# OF SALES: 119 26 22 6 1 1
% CHANGE: 6.50% 4.97% 7.47% -2.56% 7.22% '11.24%
-787-
'-788-
-789-
-790-
0 CD 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
0 ~
0 0
CD 0 0 o
0 0
0
oO cO
0 CD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0
0
0
0
0 0
0 CD 0
0
~ o' c% o
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
-791 -
I IL
LU
-792-
NOV-24-2003 09:55 HENNEPIN CTY ASSESSOR 612 348 8751 P.OlxO?
Taxpayer Services Department
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
November t4, 2003
Board of Commissioners
Sandra Verges, County Administrator
Background Information - Proposed Tax Notices (TNT)
The proposed tax notices (TNT) must be received after November 10 and mailed by
November 22 in 2003. As in past years, the net tax changes vary greatly from city to city,
depending on market values, levy, and legislative changes. Constituent questions regarding
tax rates and tax calculations can be referred to the tax information line - 612-348-3011.
Questions regarding values or homestead classifications can directed to the county assessor
- 612-348-3046.
CLASS RATES, LIMITED VALUES, AND LEVY LIMITS
Again this year, the class rates remained unchanged for most properties: residential and
single family non-homestead rates remained at 1% for the first $500,000 and 1.25% for the
value over $500,000; commercial rates remained at 1.5% on the first $150,000 and 2.0% on
the balance of the market value. Apartment rates decreased from 1.5% to 1.25%. This is the
last of three annual decreases legislated in 2001,
We are in the third year of a seven-year phase out of the Limited Market Value laws. The
limitation on values for pay 2003 was the greater of 10% of the previous year's limited value
or 15% of the difference between the current year's full market value and the previous year's
limited value. For pay 2004 these numbers change to 12% and 20%, respectively.
CONSTANT SPENDING .AND THE "MIDDLE TWO COLUMNS"
Legislation passed in 2003 eliminated the constant spending tax calculation and removed the
middle two columns ("Increases/Decreases Due to Spending" and "increases/Decreases Due
to Other Factors") from the proposed tax notice.
SCHOOL DISTRICT LEVIES
Changes to School District. certified levies are shown in Appendix D. These changes do not
include school referendums that passed November 4, 2003.
-793-
NOU-24-2003 09:56 HENNEPIN CTY ASSESSOR 612 348 8751 P. 02/0"?
SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENDUMS
Eight school districts held referendums on November 4, 2003 for taxes payable in 2004.
Those districts are Bloomington, Edina, Elk River, Richfield, Rockford, St. Anthony-New
Brighton, Waconia, Wayzata. Details of the referendums can be found in Appendix A. The
TNT notices will no...~t include the estimated additional taxes, but the notices will have a boided
announcement stating that any approved referendum amounts have not been included in the
proposed tax. The final tax bill will include the additional taxes.
Cabins and agricultural land are exempt from paying operating school referendums.
CITIES
There is a great deal of variety in the changes to city levies from 2003 to proposed 2004.
While 18 cities have proposed double-digit increases, 1 has proposed no increase at all and 2
are proposing decreases. Appendix C shows the changes in certified levies for each city in
Hennepin County.
Appendix C also includes the changes to "spending' for the county and each city. "Spending"
is defined as the certified levy plus state paid aids, and has been used in the past to calculate
the middle two columns on proposed tax notices. The county and 14 cities will have proposed
decreases due to "spending" in 2004.
The final column on Appendix C shows the projected Market Value Homestead Credit
payment that will be withheld by the state from each city and the county. 24 cities will forfeit a
portion of this credit in addition to cuts in state paid aids, In effect, this has the same impact
as a reduction in the certified levy or state paid aid. When we include this adjustment, the
county and 19 cities will have proposed decreases in property taxes plus state paid aids and
credits in 2004.
CIRCUIT BREAKER/TARGETING
The 2001 Property Tax Reform bill contained major changes to the homeowner property tax
refund program (circuit breaker). The changes included raising the maximum refund to $1,530
for homeowners; raising the maximum income to $81,600; and revising the income
thresholds & percent of tax paid by the taxpayer.
For example, if one has an household income of $70,000 and property taxes of $3,000, the
refund would be $100; an income of $40,000 and taxes of $2,000, the refund would be ,$497;
an income of $20,000 and taxes of $2,000, the refund would be $1,017 or over half of the
total tax. -
The targeting portion of the program offers relief no matter what the person's income. If their
taxes rose more than 12% and at least $100, the state will refund 60% of any amount paid
beyond those limits, up to a maximum of $1,000.
The Minnesota Department of Revenue administers both the circuit breaker and targeted form
of Property Tax Refund.
-794-
NOV-24-2003 09:S6 HENNEPIN CTY ASSESSOR 612 348 8751 P.03/07
TAX IMPACT ANALYSIS
With the tax calculations now complete, the Taxpayer' Services Department is able to analyze
the changes in property taxes from payable 2003 to payable 2004. A review of 241,939
single-family properties revealed that unless the proposed levies are decreased, 56%
(135,077) of homes will see tax increases of 10% or mom. 22% (52,027) of homes will see
decreases this year, compared with only 776 last year. This is in spite of a shift of the tax
burden toward residential property that is caused by continuing increases to residential market
value along with negligible increases to commemial market value.
Appendix B contains the tax increases on a representative single-family property by city, using
the predominate school district in each city. if you have any questions about the source of the
values used in Appendix B, call Ken Rowe at 596-9124.
If you have specific requests or have any other questions, please call Pat O'Connor at
348-4084 or Ken Rowe at 596-9124.
c: Richard Johnson
Melissa Booth
Pat O'Connor
-795-
NOU-24-2003 09:56 HENNEP IN CTY ASSESSOR 612 348 8751 P. 04x07
~PEN~IX A
SCHOOL DISTRICTS REFERENDUMS
Some school districts passed referendums in the November, 2003 general election. The TNT
notices will not include the additional taxes generated by the referendums but will have a
statement in a box and bOlded that any approved referendum amounts have not been
included, The final tax bill will include the additional taxes.
· School D/stric~ 001 - Mirmeap¢l/,s. The distr/c! did not hold a referendum.
· School pistrict 11 - Anoka-Hennepi.n,. Thc dis~ct did not hold a rcfcren&~n_
· School District l J0 - Waconia. A bond referendum for $26 ,,,,'men_ to be used for cxp~-,,ions and
renovations a! thr~ schools failed. An operating referendum to provide $950,000 annually for 10 years also
failed.
· School District 11]i - Watertown. Mayer. The district did not hokt a referendum.
· School District :170 - Ho~kius, Thc district did not hold a referendum.
school Dii.t~ct 271 -Bloomin_c-ton~. An ol~rafing referendum tc, provide $3.1 million ~,,,~,,,41y for 10 years
passed.
· ~.c~ool Distric[ 272 - Eden Pra}ri¢. The district did not hold a rrferendum.
· Sch0ql.District 273 - 1~1+~_ A bond refc~ndum for $85.g millkm to be used for defc~rzcd maintermnce and
progr, m~ passed. An operating rcfcrcndum to provide $300,000 ~,~ually for 4 years passed.
· School District 276 - Minnexolflca. The dish'ict did not hold a referendum
· Sch0~l District 277 - Westonka. The district did not hold a r~fc~ndum.
· School District 278 - Oxono. The district did not hold a referendum.
· Schqol.District 279 - Oss¢o. The district did no~ hold a rcfere,~n~m_
· SchoolDistric~2.~.0.-Richfield. A rcferendurn providing $1miilirm annually for l0 years to be used for
technology passed.
· School Diitliqt..2.$1 - Robbinsdale. The district did not hold a r~erendum.
· School District 28.2.- St. Anthony. Thc district held three referenda. TI~/[rst will provide $1 $0;000
annually for 7 yea.,-s for technology. The second will provide $140,000 annually for ? years for curriculum.
The third is an opcratin§ r~ferendum providing $259,000 annually for 4 years. All three referenda passed.
· School District 283_-_St. Louis Park. The district did not hold a referendum.
· School District 284 - WayTra~;~_ An operating r~fcrc~lum providh~ $337,000 arrnually for 4 years pzssed.
· S.chool District 2~6 - Brooldvn Cch. tear. The dhuict did not hold a referendum
· School District_?28 - Elk River. The district Mid three referenda with mixed results. A bond referendum ~o
provide $60 million for 2 new schools and improvements to existing schools failed. An operatin§
referendum to provide $2 million annually for 10 years passed. A second operating referendum which would
have provided funding to operate the two new schools passed, however it is not applicable since the bond-
referendum failed.
· School District t~77- Buffalo.. Tho dina'ici did no! hold a referendum.
S. chool Distric1879- Dclano. The distric~ did no[ hold a refere~c~,~
Schqol Diitx'i.c.t 883 - Rockfor& An operati~ r~ferendum ~o pmviclc $1 million annually for 10 years failed.
-796-
NOU-24-2003 09:56 HENNEPIN CTY ASSESSOR 612 348 8751 R.OSX07
Change In Taxes 12003 ~ T° 2004 PmlX~,~d*
Residential Properties by CRY
APPENDIX
2002 Pay' 2003 2003 Pay 2004 Tmal % Change
City Taxable Total Tax Taxable Total Tax Tax Total
. Value Final Value Proposed ' Diff. _ Tax
Bloomington. S.D. 271 157,300 1,665 176,200 1,858 193 11,6%
~B.,.r~..?dyn Center - S.D. 288 .1t4,300 1,641 128,(~30 2,008 187 9.1%
Cl'amplin - $.D. 11 146,500 1,891 164,100 1,865 -26 .1.4%
Con33mn - S.D. 877 202,000 2,572 226,2~0 2,804 232 9.0%
Dayton - S.D. 11 172,?00 2,S07 1~,400 2,3S0 .147
Deephaven - $.D. 276 262,800 ........ 3,566 _ _31_6,700 3,739 173 4.9%
· Edina -$.D. 273 234,200 2,898 362,300 2,821 .77 -2.7%
Excelsicg - S.D. 278 185,200 :~,510 207,400, 2,627 . 117 4.7%
C-.-~ - S.D. 883 222,000 . 2,g22 248,6~0 3,104 182, 6.2%
Greenwood - S.D. 276 ' 417,_80_0 8~58 467,700 5,866 ~08 9,8%
t-~_~n Township - S.D. 728 207,200 22.75 232,100 2,410 135 8.9%
Hopkins - 8.D. 270 130,800 1,770 t46,S00 1,989 219 ,. 12.4%
Long Lake - &D. 278 163,100 '1,942 182,700 2,263 321 16.8%
I nretto - S.D. 879 164.500 2,177 184,200 2.382 185 8.5%
Maple Plain - S.D. 278 158,700 1,818 177,700 2,085 267 14.7%
Meclidne Lake - $.D. 284 336,900 4,648 377,300 4,967 319 6.9%
Minneapolis - $.D. 01 110,700 1,477 124,000 1,675 198 13.4%
Minnetonka - S.D. 270 192,900 2,284 216,000 2,509 225 9.9%
Minnetflsla - $.D. 277 314,400 3,778 352,100 3,794 16 0.4%
Mound - S.D. 277 142,500 1,609 .159,600 1,705 96 · 6,0%
Omno - S.D.278 332,300 3,482 ' 372,200 3,633 15t 4,3%
Osseo - $.D. 279 128,200 %724 143,600 1,647 -77 .4.5%
Rich~eld - $.D. 280 138,000 , 1,528 152,300 1,699 171 11.2%
Robblnscble - S.D. 281 ' 116,300 %488 130,300 1,686 198 13,3%
Rogers - $.D. 728 192,500 2,642 2t5,600 2,742 ~00 3.8%
St - $.D, 282 157,300 2,003 176,200 2,368 385 18.2%
St Louis Park - $.O. 283 14%100 1,754 156,000 1,9'52 198 11.3%
Shomwood - $.D. 276 260,200 3,589 291,400 3,753 194 5,5%
-7 .............. ....... .... - '
Tonka Bay - S.D. 276 296,000 3,714 331,500 4,065 351 9.$%
Wayzata - S.D. 284 264200 3,019 284.700 3,264 245 8.1%
· Does not include ap,;,-~ed November 4, 2003 schoot district referenda
-797-
NOU-24-2003 09:58
HENNEP I N CTY RSSESSOR
612:348 8'751 P.06/07
APP~NDD~ ¢
Change to Certified Levy and Spending Amounts from 2M3 to 2004 Proposed
Hennepin County and Constituent Cities
L { Certified Lev~
District Name { Increase 2003 to { Percentage
t Proposed 2004 ~ Increase
BI. miniOn $ 1,854,830 5.75%
IBr.~,ty~ Center 404,837 3
C~pl~ ~,~ 6.10%
~ 145,~ 10.~%
Dee~hav~ C~ 78,118 5,~%
Edina ~7,295 1.~%
~bJer 80,000 9.46%
G~nfield (19,S02) -2.19%
Gmen~ 138~ 49.96%
Hop~ns 816,8~
I~e~nd~n~ ~7,880 12.~%
Lore~ 21,5~S
Maple G~e t,3~,~ 7.26%'
Medicine ~ke 11,300 5.12%
M~i~ ~ 41~31 2.87%
~nne~n~ Bea~ ~2,~1
Minne~n~ ~2,~6 2.90%
N~ Hope ~2,4~ 5.t4%
Oss~ 1 0.~%
Robbi~ale 2~,78S 7.4~
R~ ~,024 17.5I%
~ - .~ - ~' ,, ' __~.,'.
S~ Bon~adus 1~,7~ 24
~int Loub PaA 1,787,487
Spring Pa~ 92211 15.61%
Tonka ~y ~3,882 40.~%
Wo~nd $ 3,808 1
~nc~ease 2003 = { Percentage
posed 2004 t Iht=tease
1,55g,025 4.7g% S (1,696,95g)
(1,218,641) -9.64%
(139,s77) -2.39% (76,097)
118,40g 8.OO%
(93,657) -4.94% (109,875)
78,118 5.84%
347,2&~ 1,88% (828,756)
(21,592) -2.42% (3g,4.88)
138,243 49.96%
(282,5~3) .3.44% .
227,8~0 12.99%
f61.488~
' ...... ' .... i
12,445 5.10%
1,t24,75~
{988.270)
· 10,492 4.74% (3,374)
423,32¢ 2.t 3%
235,240 7.66%
1,055,256 5.82%
1737.3921
(238,143) -4.31% .
308,a40 16.03% (11~,075)
84,188 10.79%
40,488 6.04%
222~,031 40.02%
{11.677)
3,808 1.05% $ (1,177)
Municipal Total $ 33,978,804.00 $ (14,269,752.00) $ (6,8~2,302.00)
~ 'Spending' is defined as the Ce~ified Levy plus State Paid Aid. State Paid Aid fo~ Hermepin is Homestead Agricultural Credit
AId(HACA) plus County Cdminal Justice Aid(CCJA) plus Family Preservation Aid(Fl=A} in 2003 and County Program Aid in
2004. State Paid Aid for Cities is Local Government AId(LGA) in 2003 and General Aid ~ Transition ,Nd in 2004.
-798-
NOV-24-2003 09:58 HENNEPIN CTY ASSESSOR 612 348 8751 P.07/07
Change to Certified Levy from 2003 to 2004 Proposed
Hennepin County School District;
APPENDIX D
Certified Le, v~
District Name
Increase 2003 to Percentage
........................... Prop_osed 2004 Increase
Broold~ Center 288 260,544 7.43%
Eden Prairie 272 219,393 0.98%
~-:_.---:-~ - _. ... '.. _ .
Hopkins 270 1,587,332.. 8.78%
Minnea olis 001 ....... : ~,885,~08 ......
v/Mound-Westonka 277 (622,745) -9.51%
Orono 278 388,832 6.69%
Richfield 280 283,400 2.g6%
Robbinsdale 281 5,319,336 15.47%
St. Louis Park 283 292,743 1.75%
Wayzata 284 810,775 3
School Total $ 9,338,146.95
-799- TOTRL P.O?
-800-
'24
£
-801 -
&
Hennepin County Assessor Department
A-2103 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0231
www. co.hennepin.m n ;us
August19,2003
Bonnie Ritter
Mound City Clerk
5341.Maywood Rd ...........................
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Ritter:
This letter is to inform you of legislative Changes made by the 2003 Legislature that effect
the Local Boards of Appeal and Equalization. These changes provide that by no later than
January 1,2006, and each year thereafter, there must be at least one member at each local
board meeting who has attended an appeals and equalization course developed or
approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. The required course work must have been
completed by the designated local board member(s) within the last four years of each
annual local board meeting(s).
A handbook will be developed by the Commissioner of Revenue, no later than January 1,
2005 and is to detail local board procedures, responsibilities, and requirements. A review of
the handbook must be included in the local board course. Details of the course and
handbook will be promulgated by the Department.of Revenue at a later date.
In addition, the new legislation also requires that the local boards provide proof of
compliance with the course attendance, as well as, provide verification that a quorum was
present at each of the local board meetings in the prior year. This legislation provides that
any city or town that does not provide proof of compliance to the county assessor by
December 1,2006, and each year thereafter, is deemed to have transferred its board of
appeal powers to the county for the following assessment. This transference of duties to the
county is an "alternate review process" (M.S. 274.13 subd. lc.) and shall take place in April
or May with "open book" meetings. The open book meetings are where the county
assessor shall make available a procedure for reviewing the assessments with the
taxpayers. A copy of this 2003 legislation has been attached.
M:'C,21~dministrative\Policies and Procedures\Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
- 802- Recycled Paper
An Equal Opportunity Employer
· Page 2 August 19, 2003
In light of these legislative changes, I wanted to remind you that M.$. 274.01 subd. 3
· currently provides for the transference of duties from the local boards to the county
assessor. This statute is only available to those cities whose assessment services are
performed by the county assessOr.
"The town board of any town or the goveming body of any home rule charter or statutory city
may transfer its powers and duties under subdivision 1 to the county board, and no longer
perform the function ora Iocal board. Before the town board orthe governing body of a city
transfers the powers and duties to the county board, the townboard or city's governing body·
shall give public notice of the meeting at which the proposal for transfer is to be considered.
The public notice shall follow the procedure contained in section ~ 3D. 04, subdivision 2.
A transfer of duties as permitted under this subdivision must be communicated to the county
assessor, in writing, before December ~ of any year to be effective for the following year's
assessment. This transfer of duties to the county may either be permanent or for a specified
number of years, provided that the transfer cannot be for less than three years. Its length
must be stated in writing. A town or city may renew its option to transfer. The option to
transfer dutieS under this subdivision is only available to a town or city whose
assessment is done by the county".
The Commissioner of Revenue will be providing detailed instructions in the near future.
However, I wanted to take this opportunity to inform you of this new legislation and let you
know the options that are available to your City CoUncil/Board of Appeal and~ EqualiZation.
As always, if you have any questions or concerns please contact me or my staff at 612 348-
3046.
Very Truly Yours,
Thomas J. May
Hennepin County AssesSor
TJM:js
-803-
M.S. 274.13 subd. lc.
Altemative review option. The county shall notify taxpayers whose town or city elected to transfer its
powers and duties under section 274.01 to the county. Prior to the time of the county board of
equalization, the county shall make available to those taxpayers a procedure for a review of its
assessments, including, but not limited to, open book meetings. This alternative review process shall
take place in April and May.
2003 House Research Bill Summary
File Number: S.F. 1505 Date-: May 19, 2003
Version: Second unofficial engrossment
Local Boards; Appeals and equalization course and meeting requirements.
Subd. 1. Handbook for local assessom. Requires the commissioner of revenue by no later than
January 1, 2005, to develop a handbook detailing procedure, responsibilities, and requirements for
the local boards of appeal and equalization. Provides that the handbook must include:
· the role of the local board in the assessment process,
· the legal and policy reasons for fair and impartial hearings,
· local board meeting procedures that foster fair and impartial assessment reviews and
best practices;
· quorum requirements; and
· explanations of alternate methods of appeal.
Subd. 2. Appeals and equalization course. Provides that by no later than January 1, 2006, and each
year thereafter, there must be at least one member at each local board meeting who has attended an
appeals and equalization course developed or approved by the commissioner of revenue within the
last 4 years. Allows the course to be offered in conjunction with a meeting of the Minnesota League
of Cities or the Minnesota Association of Townships. A review of the handbook must be included in
the course.
Subd. 3. Proof of compliance; Transfer of dutiesJ Provides that any city or town that does not provide
proof to the county assessor by December 1, 2006, and each year thereafter, of compliance under
subdivision 2 and that it had a quorum at each local board of appeal meeting in the prior year, is
deemed to have transferred its board of appeal powers to the county for the following year's
assessment
Requires the county to notify taxpayers when the board for a city or town has been transferred, and
pdor to the county board of equalization meeting, shall make available a procedure for reviewing
those assessments (e.g. open book meetings) This altemate review process shall take place in Apdl
or May.
Provides that a local board whose powers have been transferred to the county, may be reinstated
upon proof of compliance. Resolution and proofs must be provided to the county assessor by
December I to be effective for the following year's assessment.
Effective the day following final enactment.
-804-
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA
7:00 PM, Wednesday, March 10, 2004
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad
READING OF MINUTES- 2/25/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one
motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be
removed from the consent agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING
· Hary Kreslins, new multiple dock license application to increase Boat Storage Units
(BSU's) from six to eight at 21965 Minnetonka Blvd. on St. Albans Bay.
1. Public Hearing
2. Discussion and/or Consideration .~
WATER STRUCTURES
A) Miles Canning, consideration of variance application from LMCD Code for setback
requirements and an adjusted dock use area at 21100 Excelsior Blvd. on St. Albans
Bay (Public Heating conducted at the 1/14/04 Regular Board Meeting);,
B) Cardinal Cove Beach Association, consideration of 2004 new mbltiple dock license
minor change application;
C) Thomas and Janet Tallakson, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for
denial of a dock length and adjusted dock use area variance applicati0n;
D)
Maple Hills Association, consideration of: 1) draft Findings of Fact and Order for
denial of a length and adjusted dock use area variance application, and 2) pending new
multiple dock license application;
E)
(*) 2004 Multiple Dock Licenses, staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewal,
without change, applications for Dancing Waters DOA (channel, north, peninsula, and
south sites), City of Deephaven, and Smithtown Bay Association;
F) Howards Point Marina, consideration of 2004 renewal without change multiple dock
dock license, commercial dock, and launching ramp application;
G) Additional Business;
-805-
Z. EWM/EXOTIC$ TASK FORCE,
A) Cur'fman Trucking and Repair, Inc., consideration of maintenance proDosal for the
2004 EWM Harvesting Program;
B) 2004 Zebra Mussel Project, consideration of State of Minnesota Income Contract
(handout);
C) Additional Business;
3. FINANCIAL
A) Audit of vouchers (3/1/04 - 3/15/04);
B) (*) January financial summary and balance sheet;
C) Staff update on LMCD investments;
D) Additional Business;
4. LAKE USE & RECREATION
A) Consideration of staff recommendation to award contract for the 2004 Lake Minnetonka
Boat Density and User Attitude Surveys;
B) Additional Business;
5. ADMINISTRATION
6. SAVE THE LAKE
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
10. ADJOURNMENT
-806-
DRAFT
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
7:00 PM, Wednesday, February 25, 2004
Tonka Bay City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Skramstad called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Paul Knudsen, Minnetrista; Jose Valdesuso, Excelsior; Bob
Ambrose, Wayzata; Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Crv Burma, Mound; Bert Foster, Deephaven; Debbie Halvorson,
Orono; Pete Nel~ori', ViCtbi'i'~i~ Tbm Scanl0n, Spring Park; Herb Suerth, WOodland. Aisc present: Chades
LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative TechniCian.
Members absent: Miles Canning, Greenwood; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Katy Van Hercke,
Minnetonka.
CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad
Skramstad asked Nybeck to summarize the Regular Board Meeting schedule for March
Nybeck stated that Regular Board meetings are sChedUled for March 10th and March 24th. He recommended
that these meeting be conducted unless there were a number of Board members who would be.unable to attend
them=, ..If i~appeared~that a quorum might.be not present ~it ~ither the March 10t'h Or MarCh.24t~: Regt~ia.i~bard
Meeting, he stated that it would be best to know this at this timeso that the Regular Meeting COUld be cancelled
or a Workshop/Planning Session could be scheduled in its place.
Skramstad po ed the Board members in attendance and stated that he WOuld direct staff to plan for both Regular
Meetings if the Board did not object. There were no objections.by the Board.
READING OF MINUTES. 2/11/04 LMCD Regular Board Meeting
Nybeck stated that on page 1, the minutes should reflect that "Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka BeaCh"was present
ratherthan "Tom Skramstad, Shorewood".
MOTION: Nelson moved,. Scanlon seconded to approve the minutes from the 2/11/04 Regular LMCD
Board Meeting with the change recommended' by Nybeck.
Ayes (5), Abstained (4; Burma, Knudsen, Skramstad, and Valdesuso); motion carried.
Ambrose and Babcock arrived ,at 7:05 p.m,
PUBLIC COMMENTS- Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.)
-807-
Il ii i ,I ,
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
FebruarY 25, 2004
Page 2
Mr. Randy Boyd, 19960 Minnetonka Blvd., stated that he resided on Carsons Bay and he believed it was the
densest bay on Lake Minnetonka. The Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee was established in March
2003 by the Board and he stated that he had closely followed the activity of the Boat Density Sub-Committee. He
expressed concern about its progress because he believed it appeared that the current direction of the sub-
committee was to eliminate the 1974 policy to allow the pending applications submitted by the City of Deephaven
to be approved. In closing, he stated that he believed there was a data practices act violation at the 2/19/04 Boat
Density Sub-Committee Meeting because a document was being discussed and it was not available to the
general public at that meeting.
Nybeck stated that it was not clear to him at the 2/19/04 Boat Density Sub-Committee Meeting whether the
document referred to by Boyd was public. He pointed out that he had conferred with LeFevere on this, LeFevere
concluded that the document was public, and that it was made aVailable to Boyd on 2/23/04.
Skramstad asked Foster if he Would like to update the Board on the progress of the Boat Density Sub-Committee.
Foster stated that he discuss this under "Old Business" later in the meeting.
CONSENT AGENBA. Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board
member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda.
Foster moved, Babcock seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Items so aPproVed include:'2A,
2004, staff recommends Board approval of 2004 renewal without change applications as outlined 2/19/04 staff
memo, and SA, Minutes from the 2/13/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting.
Skramstad.stated that he would like to move agenda items 2B and 2C before the scheduled public hearing if the
Board did not object Therewere no objections by the Board.
WATER STRUCTURES
B. Lisa Ryskamp, staff recommends Board approve a motion to amend the approved doCk length variance
bY substituting a revised dock plan to allow for a uniform five foot width for the entire dock' struCture.
Skramstad asked for background from Nybeck.
Nybeck stated that Lisa Ryskamp had called him recently and informed him that a mistake on the
approved dock plan was noticed by the contractor who was constructing the pe~anent dock in Forest
Lake. On the previous site plan for the permanent dock that was removed, it had a uniform five foot dock
width for the entire structure. On the approved.dock plan, it has a five foot dock Width at the slip
struCture; however, it has a three and one half foot dock width at the walkway leading to the slip
structure. He believed that this was an honest mistake by Lisa Ryskamp and he recommended the
Board approve a motion to amend, the approved dock length variance by substituting a reVised dock plan
to allow for a uniform five foot dock width for the entire dock structure.
MOTION: Foster moved, Babcock seconded to amend the Ryskamp approved dock length variance by
substituting a revised dock plan to allow for a uniform five foot dOCk width for the entire dock
structure.
-808-
Lake Minnetonka'Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page 3
Babcock proposed a friendly amendment that would require Lisa Ryskamp to submit an updated site plan
to reflect the change in width of the dock structure as proposed in the motion, Foster agreed to the
friendly amendment.
VOTE: Motion carded unanimously
C, James Houg, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length
variance application.
Skramstad stated that LeFevere had prepared Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a dock length
vadance application as directed by the Board at the 2/11/04 Regular Meeting. He asked the Board if
they had comments or were prepared to make a motion.
MOTION: Foster moved, Nelson seconded to approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval
of a dock length variance application for James Houg at 4841 Bartlett Blvd.
VOTE: Ayes (10), Nayes (1, Babcock); motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING
· City of Mound, new multiple dock license application to increase transient Boat Storage Units (BSU's) from
16 to 24 at the north end of the Lost Lake Channel,
Skramstad opened the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. and asked for background from Nybeck,
Nybeck made the following comments:
° Mr. Jim Fackler, Mound Park Superintendent, has submitted a new multiple dock license application
for consideration by the Board to increase the number of transient BSU's from 16 to 24 on the north
end of the Lost Lake Channel. The Board approved the 16 transient BSU's in 1997 and dedicated
1,500' of non-continuous shoreline to the Lost Lake Channel project for these transient BSU's. It was
unclear to staff how much 929.4' shoreline Mound was dedicating towards to the Lost Lake Channel
for the new multiple dock license application.
· Pursuant to Lake Minnetonka Conservation Distdct (LMCD) Code, a public hearing was advertised for
the 2/11/04 Regular Board Meeting in the 1/27/04 edition of the Lakeshore Weekly News. The public
hearing was opened at this meeting; however, staff recommended continuing it to the 2/25/04 Regular
Meeting because the applicant had not submitted adequate address labels as required by LMCD
Code Section 2.03, subd. 16. The Board approved this recommendation, the applicant has submitted
the additional address labels, and these residents were sent a copy of the public hearing notice.
· Code Section 2.03 clarifies that there is a need to secure a license from the LMCD to locate, install or
maintain a multiple dock or commercial dock on Lake Minnetonka. A multiple dock on Lake
Minnetonka is any dock or mooring area constructed or maintained for the construction of five or more
restricted watercraft, Because,of this definition, the 16 proposed transient BSU's approved in 1997
required a new multiple dock license and the proposal to increase transient BSU's from 16 to 24
required a new multiple dock license application, with public hearing.
-809-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page 4
Code Section 2.01 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an authorized dock use
area for docking and storage of watercraft. The proposed dock structure and boat storage would be
contained within the maximum length for this site from the 929.4' shoreline, 100'. The proposed dock
would meet the required minimum 20' side setback from the westerly side site line and staff believes it
would comply with the required 20' side setback from the easterly side site line because this site line
appears to be significantly south adjacent to the dredged channel. The applicant should clarify the
exact location of this side site line.
Code Section 2.03, subd. 16 provides special rules for municipal docks that have a width that exceeds
what is allowed by Section 2.12, subd. 12. It allows the Board to grant or deny such applications,
subject to conditions, if five conditions are met. These include: 1) The dock must be owned and
operated by a city, county or state agency, 2) The dock must be open to the general public subject to
reasonable regulations of the owner, 3) No permanent or ovemight storage shall be allowed at the
dock, 4) No license shall be granted for a dock extending more than 150' from the shoreline, and 5)
No retail sales, other than fuel, shall be permitted on the dock. He pointed out that the boardwalk at
the site would exceed six feet in both length and width, which is prohibited by Code. However, this
Code provision would allow the Board to consider the application because it meets the five conditions
outlined above.
Code Section 2.03 allows the Board to utilize a number of subjective criteria in exercising its discretion
in granting or denying applications. One subjective criterion that the Board may want to discuss is
"Whether the proposed facility is compatible with the LMCB watercraft density classification criteria".
This subjective criterion refers to the 1974 Boat Density Policy Statement that is currently be reviewed
by the Boat Density Sub-Committee and has established five warning conditions as indices to assist
the Board in making a determination whether to make a designation of "Critical". If one of these
indices is met by actual use of any area of the Lake, the Executive Director should assign a
"Potentially Critical" designation and the Board notified. If two or more indices are met, the area
should be designated "Critical" and referred to the Board for remedial action. Staff has applied the
five indices to Cooks Bay and he reported that three of them have been met or exceeded. However,
he questioned whether the analysis prepared was accurate because he believed that Lost lake
Channel was a separate water body from Cooks Bay.
The Environmental Quality Board (EQB) requires a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EAW) when dock structure and maneuvering space exceed 20,000 square feet. The City of Mound
conducted a mandatory EAW for the entire project, including docking, in 1996. The dock structure
and maneuvering space for the plan that was included in the mandatory EAW had 27,136 square feet.
The proposed site would have an estimated 19,190 square feet of dock structure and maneuvering
space square feet and the EQB does not require a second EAW until there is a cumulative expansion
of an additional 20,000 square feet from the 1996 site plan. Thus, there is not a need to conduct a
mandatory EAW for the new multiple dock license application.
Staff believes that the Board could approve the new multiple dock license; however, three things
should be clarified. First, the applicant should clarify that the eastedy side site line south of BSU #24
would meet the 20' side setback requirement. Second, the applicant should clarify how much non-
continuous 929.4' shoreline is dedicated to the Commons Program, the Lost Lake Channel project,
and the six street ends in the Woodland Point Development. Third, the Board should discuss whether
to apply the 1974 Boat Density Policy Statement to the application.
He entertained questions or comments from the Board.
-810-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
FebruarY 25, 2004
Page 5
Babcock questioned why the shoreline dedicated to the Lost Lake Channel project was not included on the
new multiple doCk license aPplication.
Mr, Bruce Chamberlain, HOisington and KOegler, stated that he was'a planning consultant for the Oity of
Mound, The slips that would be included in this project have been factored in with the entire Mound docking
program and he reported that there was approximately 34,000' non-continuous shoreline dedicated to the
overall program, The BSU's for the entire program do not exceed the 1:50' General Rule overall.
Mr. Jim Fackler, Mound Park Superintendent, stated that the amount of shoreline dedicated to the Mound
overall.doCking program has been One figure, which includes the Lost Lake Channel project. In recent years,
the City of Mound has had separate multiple dock license for both the Commons Program and the Lost Lake
Channel project. The City of Mound condUcted an extensive project in 2002 to evaluate the amount of non-
continuous shoreline through aerial photography, estimating the shoreline at 36,131'. In 2003, 30,300' of
shoreline was used for the Commons Program and Lost Lake Channel multiple dock licenses. If the Board
would like Mound to clarify how much shoreline is dedicated for these two licenses and six street ends in the
Woodland Point DeVelopment, he stated that he would work with staff to achieve this.
Foster asked how many boats the City of Mound has associated with its Commons Docking Program.
Fackler stated that this changes for season to season; however, it has not exceeded the 590 BSU's it has
been licensed for in recent years.
Foster questioned whY the City of Mound has two separate multiple dock liCenses and stated that it might
make sense to consolidate the Commons Docki!~g Program and..the Lost Lake Channel project under one
license.
Babcock stated that he believed the choice of whether,to have one or two multip!e dock licenses should be
left tO'the Ci~,' of'Mound becaUSe they a~'eqU~i~"i~2914 shoreline to proceed eitherway. However, he stated
that h'e'WoUld concur~'with the recb'm~end~ti~i~ of~.staff that the amount of non-continuous 929.4' shOreline
shOi. ild be clarified to what facili'tYit is dedicated towards. This. should be noted on the..site plan to ensure that
docking and boat stot'ag.e'cbmi~!~ With mi~'i~jm ~eibaCk.requiremenis from the side site lines.
Foster stated that he WSUld prefer to have the citY of Mound submit a document that highlights the total
amoUnt of non-contin'%~_~ Sh0r(~line through~dt i~Ound'.
Bab(~Ock stated that m'aln'~aining tWO separate, multiple dock licenses could give Mound some flexibilitY
because Of the uniqueness' of the Commons DScki~g Program.
Nybeck stated that the primary purpose to require Mound to clarify the shoreline they are dedicating towards
the Lost Lake Channel project the Commons Docking Program, and the s x street ~nds at W0odland Point
Development was to'enSure that the total a~oU'~t oi i~°n~°ntinuous 9~9.14i shorel r~i~. Was not be ng doub e
counted,
Babcock suggested that the applicant CoUld continue to dedicate 1,500' of non-continuos shoreline to the
Lost. Lake Channel project.
-811-
I IL I ,~,
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page 6
Mr. Vic Potter, 5452 Bartlett Bivd., expressed his support for the new multiple dock license application
because he believed the additional transient docks would benefit the downtown redevelopment. However, he
lived near the Lost Lake Channel project and he expressed concern about wakes because of increased boat
traffic. The entrance to the channel is already signed "Minimum Wake" and he encouraged additional
signage or buoys.
There being no further comments, Skramstad closed the public hearing at 7:39 p.m.
Babcock stated that although he was normally opposed to placing marinas in wetland areas, he was
supportive of the proposed plan because the City of Mound has gone through an extensive revieW process
and it would provide for transient docks to reduce activity density on the Lake during peak periods.
Foster stated that he concurred with the comments of Babcock.
MOTION: Foster moved, Burma seconded to approve the City of Mound (Lost Lake Channel)new multiple
dock license application for the 2004 season, subject to the applicant continuing to dedicate 1,500'
of non-continuous 929.4' shoreline to the project.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
LAKE USE & RECREATION
A. Tony Brough, review and discussion of 2004 Hennepin County Lake Improvement Program.
Skramstad introduced Tony Brough from Hennepin County and welcomed him on behalf of the Board.
He asked Brough to provide an overview of the 2004 Hennepin County Lake Improvement Program.
Brough stated that he oversees the Lake Improvement Program that Hennepin County started in 1972.
The Lake Improvement Program involves utilizing navigational buoys, maintaining major boating
channels, removing special hazards to navigation, and the management of Hennepin County public
accesses and fishing sites. He provided an overview of the 33 Hennepin County maintained channels as
determined in 1972 by the Hennepin County Board. The primary purpose for this meeting was to discuss
buoys for 2004, adding that Lt. Jeff Storms and Mike Brandt were also in attendance. The pdmary
funding source for the buoy program is Hennepin County taxpayers and efforts have been made to make
it cost effective. This is the second consecutive winter where the work has been reviewed and changes
are being proposed for the 2004 boating season. If the changes proposed for 2004 were implemented,
there would be approximately 529 buoys on Lake Minnetonka. This compares to 442 buoys in 1993, 341
in 1983, and 354 in 1974. He recommended a number of changes for the 2004 season and he solicited
input from the Board. These changes include:
Maxwell Bay near the DNR public access- The change would occur immediately east of Boy Scout
Bridge and the recommendation was to remove the set of channel markers adjacent to the MN DNR
floating fishing dock, remove the point buoy, and install two Channel markers at the old point buoy
location. Brough stated that was concerned that some boaters are unclear on which of the point
buoy to navigate and the installation of the channel markers should make this clearer and would also
-812-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page 7
eliminate one buoy.
The Board concurred with this recommendation.
Forest Lake at the north end of the bay- The recommendation was to remove the single point buoy
near Wildhurst Trail. The current landowners have placed a dock over the shallow areas and the
water depth is four feet or deeper within 150' of the dock when the Lake level is at 928.0.
The Board concurred with this recommendation.
Crystal Bay at the Point near the Lafayette Golf Course. The recommendation was to remove the
single point buoy because the water depth appears to be four feet or deeper 100' from shore when
the Lake level is at 928.0. Brough stated tha! it probably does not need to be at this location;
however, the Sheriff's Water Patrol utilizes it for enforcement purposes. Thus, the recommendation
has changed to leave it after consulting with Lt. Storms.
The Board discussed the recommendation briefly and they concurred that it should not be removed.
However, there were a number of Board members who expressed an interest in moving it slightly
towards the west near the point so that it was visible from boats traveling both directions. Brough
and Lt. Storms agreed with this change for the 2004 boating season.
Browns Bay at the northwest corner of the bay- The recommendation was to remove one point
buoy and danger buoy, and move one danger buoy and one set of channel buoys. If, after field
inspection, there appears to be too much distance between the channel marker, an additional set of
channel markers could be installed. This should make the channel area more clear while removing
up to two buoys.
The Board concurred with this recommendation.
'Gideon Bay at the northwest corner of the bay- The recommendation was to remove the single
point buoy because the water depths gradually change in this area without any defined point from
the shore. The bottom in this area is mostly silt and he understood that this point buoy was first
installed in 2000 to encourage water skiers to avoid milfoil areas and is not a navigational hazard.
The Board concurred with this recommendation.
Grays Bay near the DNR public access- The recommendation was to add a single point buoy to
the east of the public access to avoid the shallow area and direct boaters to the boating channel.
The docks for the municipal marina have reduced been significantly in length from Grays Bay Marina
and this has left a larger gap from the channel markers to the dock.
The Board concurred with this recommendation.
· Lower Lake South near Fergusons Point- The recommendation was to remove one point buoy
north of the point and add one point to an existing array of three that already exist at Fergusons
-813-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Point,
Page 8
The Board concurred with this recommendation.
Carsons Bay near the Deephaven public access. The recommendation was to remove a single
point buoy and install sWim buoys in its place that cOuld be permitted through the Sheriff's Water
Patrol temporary structure permit process. This point buoy was originally installed to keep boats
away from a resident's dock and is not considered a navigational hazard. He also suggested that the
Board might want to discuss consolidating the two slow buoys into one at the south end of Carsons
Bay.
The Board discussed this recommendation and the consensus was to remove the point buoy near
the pUblic access and relocate one ofthe two sloW buoys proposed to be removed in the place of the
point buoy. A number of Board members stated that this was a problematic area because of the
traffic that exits to Carsons Bay from the public acceSs. The Board also suggested that a sign at the
public access would be beneficial to notify the public that CarsOns Bay was '"Quiet Waters".
Brough stated that he would agree with the Changes proposed by the Board, provided an updated
drawing was forwarded to him on the exact location of the buoy changes
Big Island at Cruisers Cove. The recommendation was made by the Sheriff's Water Patrol and a
,,m_0difie ,d' Plan ,,w, as approved by the LMCD. Four north-sCuth "no-agchoring, lanes, one east-west
no,anchoring ~.,a, ne; and three slOW' buOYs will be installed for a total of 71 buOys. The east-west will
be the :,smaller 9 'd'ia~eter bUoys an~~ Will be inStalled/re~oved/cieaned direCti~ bY LMCD and
Hennepin' County staff.
The Board discussed the proposed layout and whether the north-south' lane fUrthest to the west was
necessary. The consensus of the Board was to install the p an for 2004 as proposed and revisit it
after the 2004 boating season.
Nybeck stated that the 9" diameter buOyS'would be placed' On o. rder in the near future and would be
available'for the 2004 season. He pointed out that no fUnding WOUld: be ava ab e [rOm the MN DNR
for these: bUoys.
Carmans Bay at the Pheasant Lawn private channel- A slgw buoy was installed in 1998 at the
inlet of a non-County maintained channel. In~1998, the LMCD~ approved a motion for the installation
of one slow buoy, not to exceed 100' from the shore, at this location. It.was determined that
Hennepin County Would install, remove,' and'cleab' th~buoy annually and thai the h°meowners
associati°n~would pay for all associate~:cOstSI He.Suggesied that a swm bU~ that~requires a permit
from the Sl'ieriff'S Water Patrol mightbe more appropriate than a slow buoy, However, he and Lt.
Storms concur that a slow buoy niigh[~ be appropriate if the homeowners agreed to place and remove
the buoy each boating season; A payment schedule has been established and he recommended
revisiting this slow buoy.
Babcock ~tated that when the Board reviewed the sl°W bbOy be'lng discussed in 1998, Hennepin
-814-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page9
County had budget constraints to pay for the buoy in question. This was further Complicated by the
fact that the buoy to be installed was at an entrance to a private channel rather than a public
channel. The neighbor immed'iately adjacent to this channel in 1998 testified about the concerns that
he had, especially with its close proximity to the Narrows Channel, and he agreed to pay Hennepin
County for the Placement of this buoy. One problem was that the resident did not pay for the buoy
for the 2003 season.
Mr. Jim Zimmerman, 2745 Shadywood Road, stated that he had not been inVOiced on the pdvate
buoy the past couple boating seasons. He indicated that he was the property owner who petitioned
the Board for the slow buoy in 1998. Channel markers were installed and paid by Hennepin until the
mid'1980'S at this channel entrance. He believed that this buoy was consistent with other locations
on the Lake, including RobinsonS Bay, Gideon Bay, and near the gas dock at Howards Point Marina.
He stated that the traffic in this private channel was very heavy, especially with fisherman. He had
public safety concems in1998 and the slOW buoY has greatly improVed the situation. He expressed
concern that this was the only buoy installed on the Lake that was being paid for privately, adding
that he had recently made payment to the LMcD for the 2003 season.
The Board discussed the slow-wake buoy at this pdvate channel and whether it wOuld be more
appropriate to continue to have Hennepin County oversee the installation or to allow.the
homeowners association to install it thbmselves. The consensus was to maintain the same
arrangement agreed to in 1998 to :have Hennepin County oversee the installation and removal.
Hennepin County stated that they would agree to continue the arrangement.agreed to in 1998. The
Board requested that the homeowners association make a'timely payment forthe buoy arrangement
as agreed tO in"1998! The Board discussedthe need ti3 establish a process With Hennepin County
for similar requests in the.futurei '~
Grays Bay at the channel leading to Libbs Lake. The reCommendation was to re~/iew and discuss
removing the slOw wake buoy at the channel inlet and move channel markers to 150' from the shore.
The Board concurred with this recommendation.
Areas to be investigated during the 2004 season- There was limited= discussion of a map
identifying areas to be reviewed and documented during the 2004 seaSOn for possib e. changes in the
future. It Was noted that some of these area~ t6 be.~V ewed ~ere prey Ous!y rased by Mr
Zimmerman in his comments. Additional areas not covered in this map may be investigated upon
receiving comments.
Brough concluded by stating that he woUld'be n~titying tt~e affected residents at the locations referenced
above about the changes proposed for 2004. These rec0~menda[ions cOuld change if navigational
hazards are brought to his attention that he was not currently aware of.
Skramstad thanked Brough, Lt. Storms, and Brandt on behalf of the Board for their participation in the
discussion of thiS agenda item.
B. Ordinance Amendment, first reading of an ordinance relating to the sale of alcoholic beverages on Lake
-815-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
~'ebruary 25, 2004
Minnetonka; amen~ling LMCD Code Sections 5.02 and 5.22.
Page t0
Skramstad asked for comments on the draft ordinance amendment or a motion to approve it.
Nybeck stated that the Board bdefly discussed at the 2/11/04 Regular Meeting the limitations of 14
intoxicating liquor licenses for charter boats in 2003 and the possibility that number could be expanded if
an applicant submitted a request for a restaurant. At this meeting, the consensus of the Board was to
further discuss the possibility of increasing the number of intoxicating liquor licenses for charter boats
above the 14 available and to direct LeFevere to prepare an ordinance restricting the number of
intoxicating liquor licenses in the meantime and possibly to limit the number of wine license and non-
intoxicating malt liquor license to an undetermined number. In accordance with this direction, LeFevere
has prepared a draft ordinance amendment for consideration by the Board.
Harper updated the BOard on the number of liquor licenses issued by the Board in 2003. 14 charter
boats had intoxicating liquor licenses, 13 charter boats had both wine and non-intoxicating malt liquor
licenses, and one charter boat only a non-intoXicating malt liquor license. Of the 14 charter boats that did
not have am intoxicating liquor license, 13 of them have consumption and display permits issued by the
State of Minnesota.
Babcock stated that he would prefer to maintain the number of intoxicating liquor licenses at 14 and
explore the concept of inCreas ng this number by invo v ng the member cities that have ports of call.
MOTION: BabcQck moved, Foster seconded to approve first, readings, waive second and third readings,
and adopt the ordinance amendment as amended, inserting "28" under subd, 5 for on-
sale Wine licenses and inserting "28" under subd. 2 for on-sa e beer licenses,
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
D. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
WATER STRUCTUREs
D, Thomas and Janet TallaksOn, cons derati°n of draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a
dock 'length and adjusted dock use area vadanCe apPiication.
Maple Hills Association, consideration of: 1) draft Findings of Fact and Order for approval of a
dock length and adjusted dock use area variance application, and 2) approval of a new multiple dock
license application for the 2004 season.
Skramstad asked for backgrOund from Nybeck.
NYbeck recommended that these agenda items be combined because the applications are tied together.
He pointed out that LeFevere prepared Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the TatlakSon and
Maple Hills Association variance applications as directed by the Board at the 2/11/04 Regular Meeting.
-816-
Lake Minnetonka Conservatioh District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004 '~ ~
Page 11
MOTION: Foster moved, Nelson seconded to: 1) approve the Findings of Fact and Order for approval of
the Tallakson dock length and adjusted dock use area variance application, 2) approve the
Findings of Fact and Order for approval of the Maple Hills Association dock length and
adjusted dock use area variance application, and 3) approve the Maple Hills Association new
multiple dock license application for the 2004 season.
Skramstad stated that there was an e-mail in the handout folders from Board member Van Hercke and
copies were made available to the public. Van Hercke expressed concerns about Carsons Bay being a
critically dense bay, that the 1:50' General Rule was not adequate to protect excessive dock structure
over the wetlands area, and that the Maple Hill Association applications were for an outlot situation.
Babcock stated that he opposed the Maple Hills Association applications, especially the variance
application, because it takes the 1:50' General Rule for storage purposes and automatically extends it
out well beyond the 100' length restriction for dock use areas. For variance applications that extend well
out beyond length restrictions for dock use areas, the Board has not commonly allowed for maximum
boat storage density allowed by Code and has generally restricted this. When he reviews these types of
applications, especially for variance from Code, he applies two basic questions. First, does the proposed
project make the Lake a better or a worse place. 'He believed the Maple Hills Association vadance
application would make it a worse case because a. significant number of boats would be added to a
shallow bay. He stated that he did not generally support madnas in wetland areas. Second, would the
general public benefit result from the increased development, citing density as one key aspect. For the
proposed project, he did not believe it would provide public benefit because the increased dock would be
limited to a select number of individuals.
Foster stated that he made the motion because the parties would be entitled to a similar number of boats
from individually platted tots and because the back bay has become more accessible with added
clearance under the recently constructed bridge. He believed there are a limited number of boats in the
back bay and that the land transfer would result in adding shoreline to Burton Park. He reminded the
Board that these property owners have dparian rights, although they are not defined, and that the 1:50'
General Rule was the most restrictive standard outlined in the Code. He did not believe the seasonal
docks would impact the wetland area and that installation of seasonal docks over wetlands was generally
supported by the MN DNR over dredging.
Nelson stated that he seconded the motion because he was also supportive of wetland areas and he
believed the parties involved were a model of cooperation of how this could be done at other sites in the
future.
Scanlon stated that he would support the motion because the pristine area, including wetlands, would be
somewhat protected because of the limited bridge clearance.
Babcock stated that the proposal to place one dock over the wetland area would be consistent with what
the Board has approved in the past. However, he believed that the number of boats proposed at the
Maple Hills Association would much more dense than approved by the Board at this length into the Lake
in the past. He estimated that there was 250' of usable surface area at the edge of the cattails rather
than the 435' of shoreline dedicated towards the Maple Hills Association applications. Because of this,
-817-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page 12
he stated that four or five boats at this dock might be more reasonable,
Halvorson stated that she did not support the motion because the proposal was excessive for what
should be done in a wetland area.
Valdesuso stated that he was supportive of the proposed motion.
Nybeck stated that the site immediately to the west of the Maple Hills Association, Jay and Susan Goetz,.
has an approved dock length variance. However, the dock installed does not appear to be consistent
with the approved variance order and he questioned whether the Board would like to piggyback approval
of the current dock length at the Goetz site to provide them relief for the Maple Hills Association adjusted
dock use area.
LeFevere stated that he would be concemed about piggybacking the Goetz dock length with the Maple
Hills Association because affected neighbors of the Goetzs have not been properly notified.
Harper stated that he had received a telephone call from a realtor who had a client interested in
purchasing a property in the immediate area that has an approved variance. The realtor questioned if
there were any reStrictionS at the property and Harper stated that he came across a memorandum that
was made part of the Findings of Fact and Order for that property. This memorandum addressed the
concerns of the Board at that time regarding dockS and boat Storage oVer the wetlands and vegetation in
the area.
LeFevere stated that a couple of variances were granted in the immediate area in 1991 and 1992 for
dock length variances. The Board at that time had some concem about the wetlands.and the possible
impact that dock length variances could cause environmental harm, to the wetland area, Because of this
concern, the Board informed the residents that fUrther research regarding wetlands .and dock length
variance might be Studied by the Board ih the future. These residents were informed that there could be
additional regulations adopted in the future that might require them to reduce.the length of the docks
approved. He qUestioned whether the Board would like this memorandum included with the Tallakson
and Maple Hills Association variance order if approved.
Foster stated that he was on the Board at the time referred to by LeFevere and he believed the
memorandum was appropriate at that time. Since then, the MN DNR has advocated that hand ddven
seasonal.doCks over wetlands are strongly preferred to dredging into wetland areas for docking
purposes. Because of this, he believed that the memorandum referred to by LeFevere was a moot point.
LeFevere stated that the dichotomy in this MN DNR position is to install a seasonal dock over wetlands
or to dredge into them. It may be preferred tO'build doCkS over wetiands rather than to dredge into them
for docking purposes. However, that leaves questions about how many docks should be constructed
over Wetlands, how long should theSe docks be restriCted to, and should there be other environmental
contrOls in place.
Babcock stated that he did not want to make a deCiSion on protect ng wet ands from docks and boats
based on MN DNR Policy. He indicated that he believed: the MN D~R would be more effective if they
-818-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page 13
would take a firmer position on these questions because he did not believe their policy would necessarily
work on Lake Minnetonka. He believed that there are a number of similar wetland questions in this area
when it is compared to tributary ordinance that restricts traffic to electric motors. He suggested that the
Board should prioritize preserving existing wetland areas because the "Save the Lake" committee has
promoted shoreline restoration for a number of years.
Foster stated that he believed the primary distinction between the tributary ordinance and various
wetland areas around the Lake is the flow of water in the creeks that carries phosphorous. Prop
dredging in shallow water near the proposed wetland area does not have flowing water and would have
considerably less environmental impacts.
VOTE: Ayes (5; Foster, Nelson, Scanlon, Skramstad, and Valdesuso), Nayes (6); motion failed.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Burma seconded to direct the attorney to prepare Findings of Fact and Order
for denial of the Tallakson and Maple Hills Association variance applications.
VOTE: Ayes (7), Nayes (4; Foster, Nelson, Scanlon, and ValdesuSO); motion carried.
F. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
'3.
FINANCIAL
A, Audit of vouchers (2/16/04 - 2/29/04),
Knudsen reviewed the audit of vouchers, for the pedod of 2/16/04 - 2/29/04, noting that an amended
voucher sheet was included inJhe handout folders, He pointed out that this vouChers sheet included
check #14676, dated 2/t9/04, to..Bayview Event Center in the amount of $2~340.29 for the 2004 "Save
the Lake" Recognition .Banquet Dinner. He recommended approval of the audit of vouchers as amended,
adding check #14676.
MOTION: Skramstad moved, Babcock seconded.to approve the audit of vouchers for the period, of
2/16/04 - 2/29/04 as amended, adding check #14676.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Additional Business.
4. ADMINISTRATION
A. Discussion of draft LMCD Personnel Policy.
Skramstad stated that he had worked with retired Board member Craig Nelson and Nybeck on the draft
personnel policy. He proposed two changes to the draft policy under Section 25 under Policy Statement.
In the third sentence, he recommended inserting the word "by" between the words "provided" and
"Minnesotah.. In the fourth sentence., he recommended eliminating the word "offices" at the end of the
sentence and inserting the word "office" in its. place. A copy of a spreadsheet that provided a comparison
-819-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page 14
of the proposed policy with the existing LMCD personnel policy and the personnel policies of a few
member cities was included in the packet. He asked for comments or he entertained a motion to adopt
the draft LMCD personnel policy with the two changes he recommended.
Babcock stated that he would like to ensure that the carryovers proposed in the draft policy are
recognized as liabilities and they should be accounted for in the annual budget process.
MOTION: Babcock moved, Knudsen seconded to adopt the draft LMCD personnel policy with the two
changes recommended by Skramstad.
VOTE: Motion carried unanimously.
B. Additional Business.
There was no additional business.
EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE
B. 2/13/04 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting Report.
Suerth stated that he had three discussion items from the 2/13/04 Task Force meeting to bring to the
Board's attention. First, the Task Force has agreed to begin holding meetings every two months rather
than monthly, with the next EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting scheduled for 4/9/04. Second, he believed
that the 2004 zebra mussel inspection program was under control and would be significantly improved
compared to the 2002 and 2003 pilot projects. A meeting has occurred with the MN DNR and they have
agreed to cover inspection from mid May through mid September at five selected public accesses on
Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays during peak times in 2004. A contract is currently being
prepared by the MN DNR and will be reviewed by the Board at an upcoming Regular Meeting. Third, he
stated that there was a need to begin the process to investigate whether a more comprehensive program
was feasible for 2005 and the Task Force discussed the need to establish a power point presentation to
present to interested parties, including the member cities. He expresSed concern about how a more
comprehensive zebra mussel program could be funded for 2005. He stated that he would like to
continue to move the program forward because he would rather fail at a program targeted to prevent the
infestation of zebra mussels rather than surrender by doing nothing. He concluded by stating that he
would be meeting with Board member Nelson and Nybeck to discuss possible concepts for a more
comprehensive program on Lake Minnetonka.
Halvorson stated that she understood the MN DNR was going to announce their plans for Lake
Ossawinnamakee near Brainerd for the upcoming summer. She believed it would be beneficial to better
understand what the MN DNR has planned for the Brainerd area because she believed it could have an
indirect impact on Lake Minnetonka.
C. Additional'Business,
Babcock stated that he had seen a program entitled "Lake Minnetonka's Future" on public television that
included a round table discussion of experts including John Barren and other water quality experts. The
program included discussing the lawn products on freshwater resources, new legislation on the use of
-820-
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
Page t5
phosphorous, and how everyone's actions can affect water quality. He Stated that he believed the
program was educational and well done. He recommended staff getting a copy of it so that it could be
viewed by interested Board members prior to the 3/10/04 Regular Meeting.
6. SAVE THE LAKE
Babcock stated that the Board should consider appointing a new Chair for the "Save.the Lake" Advisory
Committee because the current Chair, Lili McMillan, has retired from the Board. He stated that he would be
agreeable to serve as the intedm Chair for the "Save the Lake Advisory Committee" while the Board seeks a
permanent replacement.
7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
Nybeck made four comments to the Board. First, updated Board rosters were included in the packet for
informational purposes. Second, he stated that he was working with Lt. Storms on the possibility of LMCD
streamlining its special event permit process with the Sheriff's Water Patrol. Third, he stated that he would
be meeting with a representative from the 4M fund through the League of Minnesota Cities on possibly
reinvesting the LMCD's funds. He pointed out that he would update the Board on this at the 3/10/04 Regular
Meeting. Fourth, he stated that he was meeting with an interested party who has expressed interest in
buying one of the two remaining 1989 UMI harvesters. He pointed out that he would bdng an offer forward
for the Board to consider if this interested party makes an offer.
8. OLD BUSINESS
Foster updated the Board on two items. First, he stated that he had been working on the pending Miles
Canning variance application with the applicant and the abutting neighbors. He pointed out that he believed
a compromise had been reached with the applicant and the abutting neighbors, the compromise was
currently being updated on the survey work by the applicant, and that it would be brought for consideration by
the Board in the near future. Second, the Lake Uinnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee has had two recent
meetings and the question raised by Mr. Boyd earlier in the meeting regarding releasing the document has
been resolved after consultation with LeFevere. He believed progress was being made and that an update
would be presented to the entire Board either at the 3/10/04 or 3/24/04 Regular Board Meetings.
Babcock stated that he was an active member of the Boat Density Sub-Committee and it was not established
to make changes to existing policy to allow the Board to consider the pending Deephaven applications on St.
Louis Bay. He stated that he believed the 1974 Boat Density Policy Statement had merits and was a usable
policy, although it needs substantial updates.
Nybeck clarified that the establishment of the Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Sub-Committee predated the
applications submitted by the City of Deephaven that are pending.
Skramstad stated that he and Nybeck had a meeting scheduled for 2/11/04 with representatives from
Howards Point Marina On the possibility of them submitting a revised application for a reduced number of "off-
lake" storage spaces from the previous application that was denied. He indicated that he would update the
Board in the future on this meeting with Howards Point Marina.
-821 -
Lake Minnetonka Conservation District
Regular Board Meeting
February 25, 2004
9, NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
10. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:11 p.m.
Page 16
Tom Skramstad, Chair
Jose Valdesuso, Secretary
-822-
-FridayFax-
Supplemental budget released
Thursday the governor released his plan
to address the budget deficit and fund a handful
of new initiatives.
His supplemental budget eliminates the $160
million forecasted general fund deficit through a
mix of spending reductions, revenue adjustments
and one-time transfers from other funds.
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
March 5, 2004
Page 1
and credit loss. Because of these tight levy limits,
and because city officials are responsibly looking
at other ways to balance their budgets, the total
city property tax increase of $90 million is only
$20 million higher than it was in 2001 and 2003,
the last two years in which there were no aid or
credit reductions to cities.
Property taxes for all local governments are up
6.2 percent or $283 million over 2003 levels
statewide
lie did not recommend further cuts to local
government aid programs, but proposed
reductions and adjustments in areas such as
education programs and health and human
services provider reimbursements. He also
proposed a 3 % reduction in state agency
operating budgets for all agencies.
ARMR bills heard next week
Two bills sponsored by a coalition of businesses
known as the Alliance for Reasonable Municipal
Regulation (ARMR) are scheduled for a hearings
in House and Senate committees next week.
He is proposing spending $62 million on new
initiatives and emergency items, including
spending for several programs that would benefit
cities in the areas of public safety and economic
development. Expect both bodies to hold
hearings on the budget recommendations over the
next few weeks. See next week's Bulletin for
more information. To download the governor's
full supplemental budget, visit the Dept.
Finance's website at www.finance.state.mn.us.
Final city levies down $10 million
from preliminaries
Final city certified 2004 property tax levies are
7.9 percent, or $90 million higher than 2003
certified levies. This represents a $10 million
reduction from the preliminary 2004 levies set
last September.
Cities' LGA and MVHC reimbursement were
reduced $170 million for 2004. Cities over 2,500
population were only allowed to increase their
levies by 60 cents for every dollar of 2004 aid
I-IF 2103 (Nelson, C., R-Rochester) would
impose numerous restrictions on municipal
building and development fees and land
dedications. As introduced, the bill would
require cities to demonstrate a "direct and
essential nexus" between development fees and
land dedications and a specific need created by a
project. It would also prohibit a city from
conditioning the approval of a development or
subdivision on an agreement to waive the right to
later challenge the validity of a fee or dedication.
The bill was tabled in a previous meeting of the
House Local Government committee when
testimony revealed problems with aspects of the
bill.
The League and other city organizations have
been working with the author and proponents of
this proposal to moderate the bill. I-IF 2103 will
be heard in the House Local Government
committee on Wednesday, March 10th at
2:30 p.m. in room 200, State Office Building.
Another ARMR proposal, HF 1901 (Paulsen, R-
Eden Prairie)/SF 2037 (Kiscaden, IP-Rochester),
For more info~mali0n on city legislalive issues, conlacl any ra~mb,r of Ihe l.~ague of M[nnesota CRies Int,grgovcrnn-,~nlal Relalions leam.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-823-
95Z4?ZOGZ8 fldainistrator
Page 88Z Of 884
-FridayFax-
A weekly legislative update/rom the League ofMirmesota Cit£es
is scheduled in for a hearing in House and Senate
committees on Tuesday, March 9. This
legislation would require cities to pay property
owners' attorney fees in an eminent domain
proceeding if the final damage award exceeds the
condemning authority's original offer by 20
percent or more. It would also require cities
prove that property taken through condemnation
serves a "primarily public purpose."
The League is concerned that this proposal will
delay public projects and increase acquisition
costs by creating a disincentive for property
owners to settle. We are also concerned that the
public purpose provision could have devastating
consequences for local redevelopment, economic
development and housing initiatives.
HF 1901 will be heard in the House Local
Government committee at 2:30 p.m. in room 200,
State Office Building. SF 2037 is scheduled for a
hearing in the Senate Judiciary committee at
12:30 p.m. in room 112, State Capitol.
Homeowners' protection bill advances
in House
Next week the House Local Government
committee will vote on legislation that addresses
moisture intrusion and other problems in newly
constructed homes. HF 1801 (Klinzing, R-
Woodbury), also known as the Homeowners'
Protection Act, requires additional building code
enforcement reporting, requires pre-license
education and continuing education for building
contractors, provides public education for
homeowners, and provides a pre-litigation
dispute process and attorney fees for certain
homeowners who prevail in court.
Section 2 of the bill requires municipalities to
provide detailed accounting of staff time devoted
March 5, 2004
Page 2
to building code administration and enforcement
in their annual construction and development
fee reports. The bill would also
require municipalities to explain surplus
construction and development fees. If fees
collected in a calendar year by a municipality
exceed the expenses for which the fees were
collected, then the municipality must: 1) describe
its plan to reduce future fee revenue; 2) describe
its plan to increase the quality or quantity of
activities related to the fee; or 3) explain why it
does not expect the surplus to be repeated in
future years.
The Local Government committee will hear
I-IF 1801 on Wednesday, March 10 at 2:30 p.m.
in room 200, State Office Building. The Senate
has not scheduled a hearing on the companion
bill, SF 2248 (Scheid, DFL-Brooklyn Park).
Annexation action alert
I-IF 2738 (P. Nelson, R-Lindstrom) was
introduced this week. It is a bill that makes
sweeping changes to annexation law, including
requiring that all annexations of any size must be
Orderly Annexations, which essentially gives
townships complete veto authority over any
annexation. It also completely removes individual
property owners rights to have their property
annexed unless the township agrees to it. It
further requires all annexations to be approved by
the county board as being consistent with the
county comprehensive plan. This is very
troubling piece of legislation and may be pushed
for fast action next week. City officials who are
concerned about this bill are strongly encouraged
to contact the office of Rep. Dempsey, the chair
of the Local Government and Metropolitan
Affairs committee, to ask to be made aware of
any scheduled hearing on annexation and to be
given time to testify on their concerns if the bill is
scheduled.
For more information on city legiflalive [,,sue,`, contact any member of Ihe I_.¢8.gu¢ of Minnoota C[lies lnlergovernmcnlal Relation,, team.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-824-
Xa~ 05 2084 15:54:58 ~i~ Fax -> 9524?ZBGZO A&~ini~ra~o~ Pag~ 803 0£ 004
-FridayFax-
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
Meth ordinances, anyone?
There are major meth bills traveling through the
House and Senate committees in the form of HF
1989 (Fuller, R-Bemidji)/SF 1580 (Rosen, R-
Fairmont). The bills deal with a number of issues
surrounding the creation and abuse of the drug
methamphetamine, commonly referred to as
meth.
An amendment has been brought forward to pre-
erupt cities and counties from passing more
restrictive ordinances regarding the sale of pre-
cursor drugs. These pre-cursor drugs are items
such as Sudafed and other cold-tablet like
medicines that are used to make or "cook" meth.
The pre-emptive language has been added to the
Senate bill, but the League and AMC were able
to defeat the measure in House Judiciary
Committee.
Has your city passed an ordinance regulating the
sale of such products? If so, please contact Jenn
O'Rourke (ph: 651.281.1261, fax: 651.215.4119,
or email jorourke(~.lrnnc, org). If it is not, but its
something you are discussing at the council or
staff level, we'd like to know more. Many
counties are acting to pass their own ordinances
dealing with the other negative aspects of meth,
such as cleanup of sites--but League would like
to know more about what cities are up to on this
issue.
Legislation update
Here is a quick update on just a few of the bills
LMC IGR staff are tracking this week.
HF 898 (Thissen, DFL-Mpls) allows inverse
condemnation claims to be made against local
governments under certain circumstances where a
private vendor has been prohibited from
providing a good or service that they previously
provided. This bill is aimed at ending organized
March 5, 2004
Page 3
garbage collection, but is worded broadly and
will affect other areas. The bill was passed to the
House floor by the Local Government and
Metropolitan Affairs committee on a close vote,
but may now be heading back to the Environment
and Natural Resources committee for debate on
the solid waste policy implications of the bill.
HF 2005 (McNamara, R-Hasting) removes the
sunset date on the ban on phosphorous in lawn
fertilizer. It also extends the ban statewide. The
bill was passed to the floor of the House with
very little debate and was supported by LMC.
SF 2224 (Sams, DFL-Staples) supplies $25
million of bonding authority for use by cities who
are required to improve wastewater treatment
facilities because of pollutant load reduction
requirements under a TMDL. It also requires the
state to provide a 50% cost share grant to cities
who have those requirements. It was heard and
laid aside for possible inclusion in the bonding
recommendations of the Senate Agriculture,
Environment, and Natural Resources Finance
committee.
Deadlines, schmedlines
After not being able to negotiate on bill
deadlines, the House went ahead and set their
own first deadline for hearings of bills by March
12. Their very aggressive timeline has resulted in
lots of long meetings into the evening in order to
hear members' bills. While the Senate has also
had full agendas for their hearings, the committee
load has not quite matched the pace in the House.
LMC staff just confirmed with Senate leadership
that they have not set deadlines yet. House
finance committees are putting together their
bonding recommendations and many of these
compilations will be before the full Capital
Investment committee, chaired by Rep. Krinkie
(R-Shoreview), on Thursday afternoon.
For mo~'e info,'marion on city legislative issues, contact any member of the League of Minnesota Cities Intergove~'nmenlal Relations team.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-825-
II IL
-> 9SZ4?ZflflZfl fldainistrator Page 884 Of 884
Upcoming hearings
-FridayFax-
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
March 5, 2004
Page 4
Cable franchise reform bill to be
heard
For a full listing of House and Senate schedules,
go to the legislative website at
www.le~,..state.mn.us and click on schedules. It's
best to check in with committee staff to make
sure the bill is still on the agenda. This time of
year, many get pulled or added at the last minute.
House Local Government
Tuesday, March 9, 2:30-7 pm.
Room: 200 SOB
Chair: Rep. Dempsey
HF 2270 (Adolphson) Newspaper publication bill
HF 2493 (Lanning) Public funds collateralization
bill, allowing banks to aggregate local
government accounts
Senate Crime/Public Safety
Wednesday, March 10, 12:30 pm
Room :15 Capitol
Chair: Senator Foley
Complete discussion on meth bills
House Regulated Industries
Wednesday, March 10.2:30-7 pm
Room: 5 SOB
Chair: Rep. Westrom
Discussion of liquor law and liquor bills.
House Local Government and Metropolitan
Affairs
Wednesday, March 10, 2004, 2:30 PM
Room: 200 State Office Building
Meeting Time Note: If needed, the Local
Government Committee will
recess at 4:15 pm and reconvene in room 400
North at 5:00 pm.
Chair: Rep. Jerry Dempsey
HF2243 (Samuelson) Speed limit law violator
administrative penalties authorized.
The House Regulated Industries committee is
scheduled to hear I-IF 2542 (Westrom), which
would allow cities more flexibility in granting
additional franchises for cable tv service, at the
committee meeting at 2:30 p.m., next Tuesday
afternoon (March 9) in Room 5 of the State
Office Building. The proposal has been brought
forward by the Minnesota Telecommunications
Alliance (MTA) and has League support. The
legislation was developed over the interim
between the 2003-2004 legislative sessions and
involved extensive discussions between cable
franchise administrators represented by the
Minnesota Association of Community
Telecommunications Administrators (MACTA),
the League and MTA representatives.
To get the names and phone numbers of members
of the House Regulated Industries Committee,
call the House Information Office at (651) 281-
2146 or go to
www.house.leg.state.mn.us/. Once at that site,
you can click on the link to "committee
information" (on the left side of the screen) and
scroll down to the Regulated Industries
Committee listing. You can then click on that
listing and bring up the names of committee
members, their offices and email addresses.
For mote info~mation on city legislative ia:sues, conla¢l any member of the League of Minnesota Cities Inlergovetnmental Relations team.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-826-
Nar 1Z Z084 17:Z9:48 Via Fax -> 95Z4?ZSGZ8 Odainistrator Page 881 Of 883
-FridayFax-
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
ARMR eminent domain bills advances
Late last night, the Senate Judiciary committee
approved an amended version of SF 2037
(Kiscaden, I-Rochester), a bill that makes
significant modifications to Minnesota's
condemnation statutes. During the committee
discussions, the bill was amended by Senator
Julianne Ortman to remove provisions that
would have provided the courts the discretion
to award attorney's fees when a final award
exceeds the acquiring entities offer by more
than 20 percent. The attorney's award
provisions had already been scaled back in an
earlier author's amendment to limit attorney's
fees to a maximum of $2,000 for cases
involving most residential property.
The bill continues to place a more rigorous
burden of proof on the governmental entity
before property can be acquired. Under the bill,
the acquiring entity would have to "prove by a
preponderance of the evidence that the taking is
reasonably necessary, the taking is authorized
by law and is for a public purpose." The public
purpose clause raises questions about whether
property acquired for economic development or
redevelopment would be permissible under this
statute change.
The League testified in opposition to the bill
based upon concerns that the changes to
eminent domain statutes would unnecessarily
increase the cost for the acquisition of property
and that the narrower test for "public purpose"
would potentially make economic development
and redevelopment projects extremely difficult.
Many of these projects typically involve
assembling property through acquisition and
the subsequently transferring the property to a
private entity for redevelopment.
March 12, 2004
Page 1
The Senate bill was passed and referred to the
State and Local Government committee.
In the House on March 9th, HF 1901 was
amended in the Local Government committee
to allow the award of attorney fees to a
landowner in an eminent domain proceeding if
the final .judgment or award exceeds by 20
percent or more the last written offer made by
the condemning authority before filing a
petition. The amendment also established a
heightened standard of proof for takings
transferred to a private entity. Under the new
language, the acquiring authority must prove by
preponderance of the evidence that the
proposed taking is reasonably necessary and
authorized by law, and is for a public, not
private, purpose.
Tom Scott, an attorney with Campbell Knutson
who provides legal services to several cities,
testified on behalf of the League. He told
committee members that removing local
deference and adopting a new standard
for proving public purpose would severely
hamper city redevelopment and economic
development efforts. The League also
expressed concerns that this legislation would
provide a disincentive to property owners to
settle which would delay transportation projects
and reduce available transportation resources as
cities pay more in acquisition costs and
attorney fees.
HF 1901, as amended, was referred to the
House Transportation Finance committee.
Wine bill on the shelf until next year?
The wine in grocery stores bill, SF 914 (Scheid,
DFL-Brooklyn Park) died in Commerce
committee this week. The bill was scheduled
For more info~mat[on on city legislative i,,aues, contact any n'~mber of the League of Minnesota Cilies Intergovernmental Relations team.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-827-
95Zq?ZOfiZO Administrator
Page 88Z Of 883
-FridayFax-
with less than 24 hours notice. The committee
took testimony from two proponents and then
asked it be rereferred to the Liquor
subcommittee of the Commerce committee.
A weekly legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities
March 12, 2004
Page 2
not going on drivers' records and about a lack
of uniformity in ticketing between jurisdictions.
The author acknowledged at that time that she
did not have the favorable votes to pass it out
and to the next committee, or the Senate floor.
With that, the committee finished discussion of
SF 914 and the opponents did not testify
against the bill. Those testifying in favor were
the MN Grape Growers Association and AFL-
CIO. The League of MN Cities, the Municipal
Beverage Association, and many others were
listed on the committee's public agenda set to
testify against.
Although the bill appeared to have some
bipartisan support from the cOmmittee, it was
tabled after Representative Jerry Dempsey (R-
Red Wing), the committee chair, said he was
uncomfortable passing the bill.
Since the bill did not pass out of committee by
the House's first deadline of today, the bill is
unlikely to move forward in the House. League
staff will monitor Senate agendas for a possible
hearing in that body next week. The Senate
companion to HF 2253 is SF 1951 (Fischbach,
R-Paynesville).
The Liquor subcommittee is not expected to
take up the issue this year; the vote to kill it
there has an even wider margin than the full
Commerce committee. Like anything, it could
come back somewhere, sometime and become
part of another bill--but both sides seem to
admit it is not likely to happen.
Administrative fine bill tabled
A bill that would give cities explicit authority
to issue administrative tickets for speeding
violations under ten miles per hour was laid
over in the House Local Government and
Metropolitan Affairs committee on Wednesday.
HF 2253 (Samuelson, R-New Brighton) would
give cities specific authority to do what many
are already doing. The bill, initiated by the
Minnesota Chiefs of Police Association, was
discussed at length. City officials endorsed the
bill, saying it keeps low-level violations out of
clogged court systems while correcting illegal
driving behaviors. Opponents, including some
legislators, raised concerns about the violations
Pension Commission declines to reign
in continued health insurance
eligibility for public safety officers
The Legislative Commission on Pensions and
Retirement this week considered an amendment
to the omnibus pension bill, HF 1086 (Smith,
R-Mound), that would narrow eligibility for
continued health benefits for public safety
officers injured in the line of duty and
dependents of officers killed in the line of duty.
The language in the amendment, which has
also been introduced as HF 2966 (Krinkie, R-
Shoreview), would provide the benefit only
when the injury or death occurs while a job-
related hazardous duty is being performed.
The amendment came up just before midnight
at the end of a five-hour hearing. It received
little discussion and was defeated on a narrow
voice vote.
The League is seeking the change to Minnesota
Statutes 299A. 465 because use of the fund has
grown beyond the purpose for which it was
For more information on city legislal[ve issues, contact any m~mber of the League of Minnesota elites Intergovernmenlal R¢lali0ns learn.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.1122
-828-
Xar 1Z Z804 17:31:11 Via Fax -> %Z4720GZ8 A~minis~rator Pa~e 003'§f 803
F 'd yF
- ri a ax-
A weekly legislative uprlatefrorn the League of Minnesota Cities
created. Proponents of the original law
testified the benefit was needed for extreme
situations resulting from activities that make
public safety work unique. But many of the
claims made under the statute have been for
injuries suffered during non-hazardous duty.
For example, some claimants have been injured
while engaging in on-the-job fitness training or
office duties. The number of eligible claimants
is multiplying and causing a serious deficiency
in the fund created to provide this benefit.
Since 1997, when M.S. 299A.465 was enacted,
the Department of Public Safety (DPS) was
obligated to reimburse cities for the full amount
of the cost of continuing health benefits to
public safety officers injured in the line of duty
and for families of officers killed while on the
job. Last year, due to increases in number of
claimants, the fund used to compensate cities
for these costs fell far short of the needed
resources. Instead of increasing the fund, the
Legislature amended the law to pro-rate
reimbursements to cities based on the amount
available and the number of eligible applicants.
The 2003 law came at a significant and
unanticipated cost to cities.
The League and other employer groups worked
unsuccessfully throughout the summer to
negotiate a compromise with employee group
representatives. The League is pursuing HF
2966 in order to protect the fund for applicants
that make claims consistent with the law's
intent and to limit unanticipated costs for cities.
League staff will work with Representative
Krinkie to find another opportunity in the 2004
session to address this issue.
March 12, 2004
Page 3
Local Sales Tax Bills to be considered
Next Tuesday at 9 a.m., the Senate Tax
committee will hear several bills that would
authorize specific and general sales taxes. The
bills include SF 774 (Senator Mark Ourada, R-
Buffalo) which would authorize a sales tax for
the city of Clearwater, SF 961 (Senator Becky
Lourey, DFL-Kerrick) which would authorize a
sales tax for the city of Cloquet and S.F. 2618
(Senator Shells Kiscaden, I-Rochester) which
would generally authorize local option sales
taxes by ordinance for cities over 10,000
population.
The Kiscaden bill would allow cities of the first
class to impose a one-half percent sales tax by
ordinance, except the city of Duluth could
impose up to a 1 percent sales tax. There are no
restrictions on how these tax revenues could be
used.
Second and third class cities could impose by
ordinance sales taxes of one-half percent with
the proceeds dedicated to specific capitol
improvements including regional convention
centers, civic centers, regional airports,
libraries, public safety equipment, road or
bridge or railroad improvements and flood
control. The sales tax could be challenged by
the citizens through a reverse referendum
process.
Resolution to reauthorize
Transportation Equity Act
The LMC has posted a resolution in support of
reauthorization of the Transportation Equity
Act for city councils to consider. The resolution
is posted on the LMC web site in the 15-Minute
Advocate section at www.h'nnc, org.
For mote infm'mation on city legislative issues, conlact any member of lhe League of Minneaola Cities Inl~governrnental Relations learn.
651.281.1200 or 800.925.13.22
-829-
STANDARD
&POOKS
Steve. J, Murphy
M;najlin(I Director '
55 Water Street, 38',,h Floor
New York, NY 10041-0003
tel 212 438-2066
steve_murphy@standardandpoors.com
reference no.: 6099001
Sarah Ward Eubanks
Menagin;I Director
130 East Randolph Street
Suite 2900
Chicago, IL 60601
tel 312 233-700t
sarah_eubanks~standardandpoors.com
January 20, 2004
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Attention: Mr. Gino Businaro, Finance Director
Re: City of Mound, Minnesota, General Obligation Bonds
Dear Mr. Businaro:
Standard & Poor's has reviewed the rating on the above-referenced obligations. After such
review, we have changed the rating to "A+" from "A" while affirming the stable outlook. A copy
of the rationale supporting the rating and outlook is enclosed.
The rating is not investment, financial, or other advice and you should not and cannot rely upon
the rating as such. The rating is based on information supplied to us by you or by your agents but
does not represent an audit. We undertake no duty of due diligence or independent verification of
any information. The assignment of a rating does not create a fiduciary relationship between us
and you or between us and other recipients of the rating. We have not consented to and will not
consent to being named an "expert" under the applicable securities laws, including without
limitation, Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933. The rating is not a "market rating" nor is it a
recommendation to buy, hold, or sell the obligations.
This letter constitutes Standard & Poor's permission to you to disseminate the above-assigned
rating to interested parties. Standard & Poor's reserves the right to inform its own clients,
subscribers, and the public of the rating.
Standard & Poor's relies on the issuer/obligor and its counsel, accountants, and other experts for
the accuracy and completeneSs of the information submitted in connection with the rating. To
maintain the rating, Standard & Poor's must receive all relevant financial information as soon as
such information is available. Placing us on a distribution list for this information would facilitate
the process. You must promptly notify us of all material changes in the financial information and
the documents. Standard & Poor's may change, suspend, withdraw, or place on CreditWatch the
rating as a result of changes in, or unavailability of, such information. Standard & Poor' s reserves
the right to request additional information if necessary to maintain the rating.
-830-
Mr. Gino Businaro
Page 2
January 20, 2004
Please send all information to:
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
Public Finance Department
55 Water S~:?t
New York, NY 10041-0003
If you have any questions, or if we can be of help in any other way, please feel free to call or
contact us at n~publicfinance~standardandpoors.com. For more information on Standard &
Poor's, please visit our website at www.standardandpoors.com. We appreciate the opportunity to
work with you and we look forward to working with you again.
Sincerely yours,
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services
a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
By: Steven I. Murphy-~
Managing Director
cf
enclosure
-831 -
I ,I, , II
Publication date: 20-Jari-2004
Reprinted from RafingsDirect
Summary: Mound, MN
Credit Analysts: Winnte B Fong, Boston (1) 617-371-0316; James Wiemken, Chicago (1) 312-233-7005
Rationale
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services raised its rating on Mound, Minn.'s GO
bonds to 'A+' from 'A' based on the city's continued strong financial
performance with minimal capital needs. The outlook is stable.
Additional rating factors include:
· Strong growth in the market value of the property tax base,
· Above-average wealth,
· Consistently Iow rates of countywide unemployment, and
· Low debt burden.
Given the city's nearly built-out nature, its limited growth potential tempers
these factors.
Mound, with a population of 9,435, is a suburban and residential community
about 20 miles west of the Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA in Hennepin County.
The city', which is nearly built out, occupies about 4.5 square miles of land.
Mound's residents have easy access to employment opportunities in the
broad economies of the Minneapolis-St. Paul region. Mound's average per
capita wealth, which has been growing dudng the past decade, is currently at
147% and 159% of state and national averages, respectively. Hennepin
County's unemployment rate, currently 4%, has consistently remained below
state and national averages since 1990. The city has a moderately sized
property tax base as measured by its current market value of $625 million, or
$66,110 per capita. Market value has grown an average of 8.2% annually for
the past five years. Much of this growth is attributable to the redevelopment of
both commercial and residential sites. The tax base is not concentrated, and
the 10 leading taxpayers account for just 8.6% of total assessed value.
Mound has maintained a historically strong financial profile. Fiscal 2002 ended
with a nearly $1.9 million unreserved general fund balance, or 57% of
expenditures. Fund percents ranged from 37%-58% over the past six years.
The city also posted a net operating surplus, after transfers, of $316,000.
Property tax revenue provided 62% of total fiscal 2002 revenues of $3.9
million. Preliminary fiscal 2003 numbers indicate an increase in the general
fund balance to $2.281 million, which is a 23% increase from the prior year's
levels.
Overall net debt burden is moderate due to the city's share of county debt.
Overall net debt is $1,690 per capita but a Iow 2.6% of true value. Direct debt,
which does not include overlapping debt, is also Iow at $709 per capita and
1% of market valuation.
Outlook
The stable outlook reflects the expectation of continued strength in the city's
financial management, coupled with steady growth in its tax base.
Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect,
Standard '& Poor's Web-based credit analysis system, at
www. ratingsdirect.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found
on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www. standardandpoors.com; under
-832-
Credit Ratings in the left navigation bar, select Credit Ratings Actions.
Published by Standard & Poor's, a Division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Executive offices: 1221
Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. Editorial offices: 55 Water Street, New 'York, NY 10041.
Subscriber services: (1) 212-438-7280. Copyright 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. Information has
been obtained by Standard & Poor's from soumes believed to be reliable. However, because of the
possibility of human or mechanical error by our soumes, Standard & Poor's or others, Standard &
Poor's does not guarantee the acmJracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information and ts not
responsible for any errors or omissions or the result obtained from the use of such information. Ratings
are statements of opinion, not statements of fact or recommendations to buy, hold, or sell any
securities.
-833-
Page 1 of 4
Kandis Hanson
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka. k12.mn.us>
"Leah Weycker" <weyckerl@westonka. k12. mn. us>
Thursday, March 18, 2004 4:30 PM
WHCC 3/24/04
Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
Wednesday, March 24, 2004
12:00-1:30 PM
Gillespie Center
2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound
Any comments or questions, contact Leah Weycker, Collaborative
Coordinator,
at 952-491-8058 or WeyckerL.~westQ~a,k.!..~mn..us
1. Lunch 12:00
Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a light "free will
donation" lunch, suggested value $6.00.
2. Introductions
3. Additions or Changes to the Agenda / Minutes
4. Announcements
5. Project Presentations
A few more presentations on projects that are requesting funds from the
collaborative.
6. Community Statement
Please bring any surveys you have on the community statement. We will
be tallying the responses and talking about next steps.
7. Budget
We will be adopting a budget for the 2004-2005 fiscal year.
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that
matter."
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
**Advisory Group Updates**
* Health - Depression and Suicide Awareness Task Force
Sandy Olstad, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke
-834- 3/19/2004
Page 2 of 4
Camp TOAD students are still meeting to discuss community awareness
about depression and suicide.
Sandy Olstad and Leah Weycker met to discuss the WeCAN health advocate
proposal and some future plans for health related projects. Most of the
health group was not available for the meeting. We could use more
helpers in this group.
*Youth Activities - Skate Park Task Force
Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Kathy Jones, Kim
Erickson Heiar
The youth group met a second time to finalize their budget. Grandview
is willing to help with the after school activity bus because they find
it very needed.
*Parent Education
Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Bill Erickson, Amy Taggart
Parent Education meeting was not held this month.
*Community
Margaret Holste, Carol Olson, Ginny Lozano, Jeanette Metz, Dena
Kuenzel
The Housing and Home Improvement Fair is going to take place on May
4th, 2004 at the Gillespie Center. Please help us get the word out to
vendors and people that can benefit from attending.
*Executive / Finance
Kim Heiar, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy
Raushendorfer, Mary Hughes
The Executive group did not meet in February.
*Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County
The Alliance meetings have been very informative with a new feature of
best practice sharing. We received some good ideas about safe and
affordable housing issues from a Minneapolis city councilman and
employee of Project for Pride in Living.
**Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative
Minutes - February 25, 2004**
Present: Craig Anderson, Johanna Eckman, Denise Eng, Bill Erickson,
Kim Erickson-Heiar, Mary Hughes, Kathy Jones, Ginny Lozano, Laura
Lundberg, Carol Olson, Sandy Olstad, Sandy Rauschendorfer, Gwenn Spence,
Amy Taggart, JeanAnn Thayer, Sandy Wing, Leah Weycker.
Kim Heiar opened her first meeting as chairperson. Carol Olson made a
motion to approve the minutes from February's meeting, seconded by Mary
Hughes. Motion approved.
There were no add offs to the agenda.
- 835- 3/19/2004
Page 3 of 4
Announcements:
WeCAN fundraiser Prayer Breakfast is March 18th. Bless the Badge will
be presented by Jim Kurtz. 6:45 is check in with the program starting at
7-8:30.
Community Statement:
We talked about the latest draft of the community statement. One person
had a problem with being a roll model when she already smokes and finds
it difficult to quit. We looked at other wording for the sentence. We
decided to wait until all the surveys from the student conferences are
returned and look at them in whole. Although we want the community to
adopt the statement, we don't want to water down the message. Everyone
took time to fill out a survey and took copies to hand out to their
constituents.
PROJECT PRESENTATIONS
Gwenn Spence covered the school readiness project that started late in
the school year. They researched best practices to add two, half time
teachers to work with kindergarten and first graders in both elementary
schools. The program has helped identify kids that need more help and
special education services. One 4th grader that had moved from several
schools was given the extra assistance to catch up to the correct grade
level. The LCTS funding covers a portion of the salary and some of the
supplies.
Gwenn also covered Primary Project which got a bumpy start in the
Westonka school district. It is going good now and we are very happy
with Sandy Cook, our child associate. The first twelve week program
served early childhood sites and the second twelve week program, just
starting, will serve K and 1 st grade.
Kim Heiar covered the youth center drop-in at Grandview middle school.
Surveys are being tabulated that asks 5th graders if they feel more
connected to school. 12 of the "regular" kids have done pre-tests and
will do post-tests later. It is a safe place for after school play. They
are finding that the kids that really need to be there are using the
site. These are the kids that are not involved in other, coordinated
after school activities. Having the kids pay to attend is not working
very well. About 10 of the participants are using the after school
activity bus. JeanAnn Thayer, Grandview counselor, sends kids to the
program if they need "connections".
JeanAnn Thayer covered the Kindness Retreat. This is the 7th year of
the retreat for 5th graders. The kids make commitments related to
kindness and remember the commitment for years after. The counselors
often remind them of the commitment if things act up. The guidance and
counseling staff find good connections with the 5th grade Kindness
Retreat, the 8th grade Respect Retreat and the 12th grade Senior
Retreat, all done by Youth Frontiers. They would like to add a 10th
grade event and a parent component would fit in well with the
-836- 3/19/2004
Page 4 of 4
collaborative agenda.
JeanAnn also spoke about the summer school that was funded last year.
Targeted services funding was cut so they did a smaller version of
summer school for kids that failed a core class. A few of the kids were
targeted because it would be a good place for them to be in the summer
months. The school ran 4 days a week for 6 weeks. There is an academic
focus but some team building exercises on Thursdays.
Going along with summer school, JeanAnn discussed scholarships for the
summer school bus. About 15-20 riders from the middle school needed
assistance with transportation.
The next WHCC meeting is March 24th. We will be voting on the budget at
that meeting.
Motion to adjourn. Motion passed.
-837- 3/19/2004
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURi:: RI:PORT
Feb. 2004
16.67%
Feb. 2004 YTD PERCENT
BUDGE~T EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANC_ E EXPENDED
GENERAL FUND
Council 72,850 2,907 5,194 67,656 7.13%
Promotions 3,750 3,750 3,750 0 100.00%
City Manager/Clerk 276,900 20,423 33,502 243,398 12.10%
Elections 13,460 118 1,014 12,446 7.53%
Finance 234,070 15,921 26,883 207,187 11.49%
Assessing 79,300 0 0 79,300 0.00%
Legal 135,580 5,429 5,429 130,151 4.00%
City Hall Building & Srvcs 124,270 24,716 27,081 97,189 21.79%
Computer 29,900 5 2,438 27,462 8.15%
Police 1,301,340 107,288 193,706 1,107,634 14.89%
Emergency Prepardeness 7,130 157 811 6,319 11.37%
Planning/Inspections 367,880 45,577 58,568 309,312 15.92%
Streets 701,130 92,307 112,576 588,554 16.06%
Parks 351,820 21,563 57,057 294,763 16.22%
Cemetery 9,610 (24) (24) 9,634 -0.25%
Transfers 256,690 0 21,391 235,299 8.33%
Cable TV 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00%
Contingencies 60,440 478 478 59,962 0.79%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL 4 076 120 340,615 549.854 3,526,266 13.49%
Area Fire
Service Fund 638,140 26,676 41,790 596,350 6.55%
Dock Fund 143,150 6,703 15,670 127,480 10.95%
Capital Projects 0 28,777 28,777 (28,777)
TIF 1-2 0 24,571 23,706 (23,706)
Water Fund 687,240 57,252 72,224 615,016 10.51%
Sewer Fu nd 1,201,940 74,637 164,457 1,037,483 13.68%
Liquor Fund 559,800 62,663 80,629 479,171 14.40%
Recycling Fund 167,680 9,323 19,210 148,470 11.46%
Storm Water Utility 96,870 17,648 19,308 77,562 19.93%
Exp-02
03/17~2004
Gino
-838-
GENERAL FUND
Taxes
Business Licenses
Non-Business Licenses/Permits
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Court Fines
Franchise Fees
Street Lighting Fee
Charges to Other Dpts
Other Revenue
TOTAL REVENUE
FIRE FUND
DOCK FUND
MOUND HRA
WATER FUND
SEWER FUND
LIQUOR FUND
RECYCLING FUND
STORM WATER UTILITY
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
Feb. 2004
Feb. 2004 YTD
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE
2,222,510 0 0
9,150 0 1,800
273,500 9,186 18,539
368,200 0 0
257,050 6,618 11,038
100,000 0 9,788
352,000 99,707 78,413
75,000 8,727 17,833
14,000 (250) (250)
38,600 5_ 60
VARIANCE
(2,222,510)
(7,350)
(254,961)
(368,200)
(246,012)
(90,212)
(273,587)
(57,167)
(14,250)
(38.540)
16.67%
PERCENT
RECEIVED
0.00%
19.67%
6.78%
0.00%
4.29%
9.79%
22.28%
-1.79%
0.16%
3,710.010 ~ 137.221 (3.572.789} 3.70%
(577,818)
(11,253)
178
(652,054)
(1,001,597)
(2,091,453)
(121,217)
(99,011)
674,140 5,130 96,322
115,900 77,770 104,647
0 0 178
700,000 21,189 47,946
1,202,000 103,684 200,403
2,400,000 114,972 308,547
137,400 8,278 16,183
120,500 10,847 21,489
14.29%
90.29%
ERR
6.85%
16.67%
12.86%
11.78%
17.83%
0311712004
rev01
Gino
-839-
General Fund $1,751,863
CDBG 1,114
Area Fire Protection Services 158,104
Dock 242,049
G.O. Bonds 2001. C 93,702
Commerce Place TIF (289,226)
TIF 1-2 Notes (5,127)
G.O. Bonds 2001 - A 6,054
G.O. Bonds 2003 - A 176,t63
H RA Lease Rev Bonds (234,431)
Capital Improvement 1,088,674
MSA 20,014
Sealcoat 38,912
CDB 4,264
Downtown TIF 1-2 2,573,263
HRA Public Safety Bldg 25,748
Water 1,540,077
Sewer 1,129,349
Liquor Store (271,206)
Recycling 28,694
Storm Water 273,836
Fire Relief (19,283)
HRA 0
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included.
A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the
independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report
will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties.
In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds
available for spending.
03/17~2004
CashReportCouncil
Gino
-840-
PENNY STEELE
COMMISSIONER
612-348-7887
FAX 612-317-6119
penny, steele~co.hennepin.mn.us
BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A-2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487-0240
March 15, 2004
City Manager Kandis Hanson
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Ms. Hanson,
A Public Hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday, April 13, 2004 at 1:30 p.m. to be held
in the 24t~ floor Board Room of the Hennepin County Government Center at 300 South
6th Street in downtown Minneapolis. The subject of this meeting is the encroachment of
private property owners onto Hermepin County rights of way and how to resolve the
issue.
As your Hermepin County Commissioner, I wanted to notify you well in advance of
this meeting so you can alert your City Council and residents of Mound who may wish
to testifY or to provide Pertinent input~ PleaSe feel free to call my office should you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
Penny Steele
Hennepin County Commissioner - 7th District
PS:cd
PRINTED - 8 4 ~ - ~LED PAPER
I l& & ,&,
DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES
March 18~ 2004
Present: Commissioners Jim Funk, Greg Eurich, Gerald Jones, Michelle Olson
Council Representative Mark Hanus, Park Superintendent Jim Fackler,
Dock Administrator Katie Hoff, Secretary Denice Widmer
Absent: Commissioner Frank Ahrens
Citizens Present: Orv Burma 3011 Island View Drive
Cliff Schmidt 3001 Island View Drive
Paul Glynn 4600 Cumberland Rd
Chair Funk called the meeting to order at 7:32pm
1. Approval of February 19~ 2004 Minutes
MOTION by Funk to approve the February 19
Jones. Motion Carried.
2. Agenda Changes. # 6 - Citizen not in
3. Comments and Suggestions from Citize
~004 Minutes. SECOND by
Could be FYI Item.
4. Conduct: 2004 DCAC Slip Lottery.
#84 - 126 were drawn. Result Sheets are
te Minutes.
Discuss: Site Plans for Light at Avalon Park
Fackler handed out the Agreement draft that was
Attorney, John Dean.
recommendation.
Island View
recommen
Greg Skinner has
what type of pole will
the light will be a 500
up by the City's
as POSAC Minutes containing their
tse from insurance carrier as yet. Orv Burma, 3011
issue and handed out a site plan. Hanus
~e of hood for the light, much like what
in town. Burma agreed. Fackler asked
De a 3x3 steel pole painted brown and
en bulb.
Discussion on the Agreement in the following recommendations:
1. # 6 - Termination. (i) the fail to pay, following notice, all be changed
to any of the costs.
2. That the numbering be corrected. (Goes from # 6 back to #3.)
3. Add #12 - Review. Will be reviewed one year after execution by dock
holders, neighbors, DCAC and City Staff.
4. Add #13 - Corrective Measures. Something to the effect that if changes are
recommended following the one year review, that all parties will follow the
review process to the best of their ability.
MOTION by Hanus to approve the Agreement as amended. SECOND by Funk
MOTION CARRIED. (John Dean will be notified regarding these changes,)
Discuss: Securi .ty Concerns at Carlson Park Multiple
More an FYI Item since problem had corrected itself. Funk recommended
keeping an on eye on that area.
-842-
7. Review: Shoreline Inventory Map and BSU Count
Fackler gave a brief overview, stating that this is something for the DCAC to
consider for the LMCD permit possibly in 2005. Fackler stated that the LNICD
was agreeable to allowing two permits; one for Lost Lake and one for the rest of
the Docks Program. The LMCD also agreed to the following formula; 36,000 lnft
Minus 1,500 lnft divided by 50 leaves 692.62 BSU's. Fackler stated that the
program is well within the 590 BSU's, but the DCAC needs to consider where
they want to be with the system. It is costly to apply for an application with a
change. Funk agreed stating that the needed to keep a buffer and evaluate how
many can be added to be cost effective. Fackler reminded them to keep the
Dreamwood issue in mind, as lineal footage may be lost following the suit. This
will continue as a discussion item in order to decide what year the application
with a change should be submitted.
8. Discuss: 2003 Financial Final Report
Discuss followed on the Fund Balance and th,
Mayor has requested. This will continue a
the issue of charging a non-refundable
having them pay $250 that is refunded to
pay a non-refundable fee of $10, $15, or $20.
administrative costs and increase revenue.
for recommendation to the City Council for the 200
ge planning that the
Item. Fackler brought up
a waiting list. Rather than
get a dock, they would
,uld cut down on
! present this to the DCAC
9. Discuss: April Agenda Calendar
Review: Shoreline Inventory Map/BSU Count
Discuss: 2004 Rip-rapping Project
Discuss: Financial Report/Long Range Plan
Discuss: Proposal for Waiting List Non-Refundable Fee for 2005 Season
10. N~~lk
MO.~ Funk t~urn.
Meeting a~m
SECOND by Jones. MOTION CARRIED.
-843-
[_ MISSION STATEMENT: "The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides, at a reasonable cost, quality
~ices that respond to the needs of a citizens, fostenng a safe, attract'ye and flourishing community."
JOINT MOUND PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP AGENDA
MONDAY, MARCH 29, 2004
7:00 PM to 9:00 PM
MOUND CITY HALL
1. Review of Proposed 2004 Projects List and Prioritization
2. Discussion Items
QUESTIONS: Call Jill at 952-472-0607 or Sarah at 952-472-3190
Ii ~k & ,t, Ii , ,1,
2004 Proposed Project List
1. l O0-ft Lakeshore Setback in Pedestrian District
--) Standard setback is 50 feet from the OHW in all other districts
2. MCWD Noticing Procedures
--> Current MCWD requirement is 600 feet vs. 350 feet per City Code
n
Nonconforming Uses (Section 350:420) --) Current section groups use, structure and parcel provisions together
--) Staff would propose each provision be its own subsection.
4. Accessory Buildings
-->Clarify Section 350:435
5. Required Yards and Open Space (ie. deck encroachments) --> Review Section 350:440
--> Setbacks for sideloaded garage additions that are part of principal structures
--> Applicability to both lakeshore and non-lakeshore lots(?)
--> Clarify "Accessory Building Setbacks" and "Detached Garage Setbacks" language
and graphics
---> Review upper floor use of detached accessory structures
Setbacks --) Consider setbacks from unimproved roadways same as fire lanes
--) Review corner lot provisions
--) Consider requiring setbacks from private driveways
7. Wetland Regulations
--> Current section pre-dates 1991 Wetland Conservation Act
8. Streamlining
---) Consider evolution of non-conforming section to include additional provisions:
· Applicability to vacant lots of record
· Treatment of nonconforming setbacks during remodeling
· Nonconforming lot width and area application
9. DNR Bluff Definition and Application
---) Update the standard definition to reflect developed conditions
10. Minor Subdivision (Section 330:20 Subd. 1) -) Process is being used more frequently to develop smaller remnant parcels that
often do not "need" a full provision of public infrastructure (ie. Homola)
--) Staff would like to review a number of policy and technical issues:
· Current process is controlled through conditional use permit (CUP)
process to secure private improvements, maintenance, and ownership
provisions.
· Should there be are more standardized process similar to a major
subdivision for necessary driveway and utility infrastructure?
· Should the CUP process continue to be used or should it be more
administrative in nature?
· Review of minor subdivision application requirements, procedures, etc.
11. Grading Permits
--) Consider additional provisions to minimize alterations that significantly change the
character of the land or built condition when other solutions are available
12. Fence Regulations
13. Driveway Standards
14. Sign Regulations
15. Floodplain Map and Ordinance (2002-2004 Hennepin County Floodplain Study)
16. Other(s)
Additional Discussion Topics
1. Clarification of subdivision exemption provisions adopted in 2003
2. Comprehensive remodel projects (ie. "McMansions")
3. Defining "hardship"
4. PC review of SWMP permits (ie. stormwater, floodplain, etc.)
5. Regular PC meeting date
6. Status of proposed MCWD Rule M amendments
7. MHRD
8. Other(s)
-350.420
3~0.420 Non-conformln~g Uses. ~
Sub& 1. Any structure or use lawfully existing upon the effective date of ti'ds Chapter
may be continued at the size and in a manner of operation existing upon such date.
Subd. 2. Nothing in this Chapter shall prevent restoring of a structure to safe
condition when said structure is declared unsafe by the _City~,, providing further that the
necessary repairs shall not cons~ute-more than 50% of the fair market value of such
structure.
Subd, 3. When any lawful non-conforming use of any structure or land in any disU'iet
haz been changed to a conforming use, it shall not thereafter be changed to any non-
conforming use.
Subd. 4. Whenever a lawful non-conforming structure shall have been damaged by
fire, flood, explosion, earthquake, war, riot, or act of God, it may be reconstructed and
used az before if i:t be reconstructed within twelve (12) months after such eaiamlty, unless
· .the. damage to the ~ilding or structure is 50 percent or more of its fair market value as
shown on the assessor's records at the ti.me of damage in which case the whole thereof
shall be. demolished and any construction thereafter shall be for a use in accordance with
the provisions of .this Ordinance.
Subd. S, Whenever a lawful non-conforming use of a stnmure or land is discontinued
for a period of twelve (12)~ months, any future use of said structure o.r land. shall be in
i'
~onfov~:,.ty with. the pmv: s~o~ of this Chapter.
Sub& 6. A law.&l, non~onfomaing use of a structure or parcel of land may be
ohanged to a simil~ non-conforming use or to a more restrictive non.conforming use.
~ non~gorming ~. are p~efl by condifionai, use pem-d~ts. Once a stmcm.re or
pace, aloof land. la~,~.pl, .ae~ in a. more restrictive non-conforming use, it shall, not mmm
to a~ le~, ze~defive non~onfo~g u-se.
Sub& ~. Normal ,maintenance of a building or,other structure containing or relat~ to
a, layoff nonconforming use is. p~rmi~ted, including necessary non-structural repairs and
ineidon~ allemfions that do not ex. nd or intensify the non-confomaing use;..
· 8. Almrat-~ns may be made to a building contai'ning lawfu~ nonmonfo,rming
m~fi~!~ .. uni~ 'a~hen they wilt improve the li~abi:li~ thereof, provided they will not
~ ~e numbed:of dwetting ~ts, with the recommendation and approval of the City
22 2/$//00
350.420, Subd. 9.
~ 9...~.~~rming principal, and a~-cessory structures may be ~x~a~ded,, ,enlarged,
or rno~:fi~d, or conforming structures could be added provided that ~¢ u~.of~the parcel is
~g to district regulations, and provided' that the cxpansio~tt;-erff£rgement, or
modification meets the current zoning regulations and no other non-conformities are
cm.,amd. In the event that a non-conforming structure is removed, razed, or demolished,
all ~wly proposed construction must meet current zoning regulations. ORD. #103-1999,
8.-.9.,99)
OL~ SUBD. 9 & 10 - (REPEALED BY ORD. #103-1999, 8-9-99),
23
215100
350.425
350.425 Zoning Coordln?tion. Any zoning district change on land adjacent to or across
a public fight-of-way from an adjoining community shall be referred to the Planning
C.~rmnission, and the adjacent Community for review and comment prior to action by the City
Camcil gran~ng or denying the zoning district classification change. A period of at least
thirty days shall, be provided for receipt of comments; such comments shall be considered as
advisory only.
350.430 Zo~g and Land Use Plan. Any change in zoning granted by the City
Council shall automatically amend the Land Use Plan and the Land Use Map in accordance
with said zoning c.hange.
350.435 Accessory Buildings.
Subd, 1. No ac~ssory building or structure shall be constructed on any residential
lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory.
Subd. 2. No accessory building shall exceed the height of the principal building in
~ "R" Di, s~ts,
Subd. 3. In Residential Districts, accessory buildings shall'be pemaitted providing
~,at. ~th~;¥ comply wiah the re~gulations found in the District Provisions Section of this
O.~I. inaa~e.
Sabd, 4, Ia Co~. ev¢iat and Industrial Districts all accessory building setbacks
sludi ,qual the p~iaeipal buildi.ng setback requirements.
Subd. ~ Ack,Residential Building Setback Requirements:
Side Yard ..Setb!c~, A detached accessory building may be located
w. it, hia f~ur (l) feet of the side lot line in the mar yard. with a mini.mum
~ a si.~: (6)foot selbae, k in. side yard location, On ~rough and lakeshore
lots, a da ~taeh~l ae~¢sso~ building may be located wi. thin roar (4.) feet of
the rdd~ lat line in the front yard.
Whenever a garage is. so designed that the doors face a side street or side
pmp.orty li~:, th~ distance between the doors and the property line shall
be t~venvj (~). feet or mom.
24 2/5/00
350.435, SuNi. 5. B.
(front)
:
STREET STREET
Lakeshore or
Through Lot
Typical Lot
Accessory Building Setbacks
~~~" For,' oetacne.(l garages on a,}~esnom or mro~¢ lots, a
~~' ~o~ (~) foot fr°~t'y~ ~tb~k is' re~ir~ if te g~age
d~e(s) epen m ~ s~t; ~ eiCt (8) foot fret y~d set~k is requir~
if ~e ~e ~o~(s)open ~ ~e side lo~ I.~e,
25 215100
· 350.435., ~abd. 5. C.
Typical, L°t
L~akeshore or
¢' Thi+OUgh Lot
Detached Garage .Setbacks
s~abj~:t t~. a ~50 foot setbaek fro. m the o.~in~ high Water. line of all lakes,
st~cm,.r.~s shall also be subject to accessory building setbaeks~
R~ar yack. A detaeh~ aecesmry building may be locat~ within
four (4) fe~t of .~. r. ear bt line.
Lak'esho~,$~tbaek,: Demehed~'aeeessory bail'dings.must maintain a 50
· foet~ ~.t.baek:¢~,om the o.rdin~ high water, ~: :'
'$h~ds and o~er'.bui.ldings less th~ 120 Square feet ia floor area shall be
Such
26 2/5/00
Mound City Code
Required Yards and Open SPace.
350.440
Subd. 1. No yard 'or other open space shall be reduced in area or dimension so as
to make su. ch. yard or"other open space less thanthe minimum required by this
Ordinaaee, and if the e~sting yard or Other open'space as existing is less than the.
minimum required, it shall not be further reduced. '"'~,
Subd. 2. No required yard or other open space allocated tO a building or dwelling
group shall be used to satisfy yard, other open space, or minimum lot area reqUirements
for any other building.
Subd. $, The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard
requirements.
Chimneys, window air conditioners, belt courses, ·leaders, sills, pilasters,
lintels, ornamental features, mechanical deVices, c0rniees, eaves,
gutters, and the like, provided they do not extend more than two (2) feet
into the required~yard area::
3'..are fe ~t whi :h2 squ e 'c do no ' ~ ' _ h~ve the height ne ~%~...~,~
gr~~ev~_t,.en .ef-lfi~d steps .that do not
ex.nd to a d~s~ee'of less than two: (2) feet,from any lot line' '--~/' '"-~
Decks, balconies, and the like, attached to the principal building which
extend in. elevation above the height of the ground floor elevation of the
principal! building; and decks, balconies, and the'ti:~'., ~ from the
principal building and exe_.xe__?eding 30 inches in height, above the
~rrouncting grade provided they do not extend within reno0) feet of the '
~t line or extend beyond side yard and front y~d :~eeSsory'
building setbacks. On lakeshore lots, such struetu~'eg'shal:l.~eompiy with
the lakeshore setback of the principal structure.
Detached decks or sirnilar Structures which do not eXtend above 30
inches in elevation above the height of the surrounding grade and do not
extend to a distance of less than two (2) feet from any lot line. On
lakeshore lots, such Structures shall comply with the lakeshore setback of
the principal, structure.
27
2/5/00
Mound City Code
M0.440, ~ubd. 3. E.
Yard lights and name plate signs for single and two family dwellings,
lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety
and sex:urity purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible
from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property. Such
fixtures may be located within five (5) feet of the front lot line.
Fire escapes not exceeding three (3) feet in width in side or rear yards
only.
Recreational equipment such as a swing set, slide, climbing apparatus,
sandbox and the like, clotheslines, picnic tables and other equipment
accessory to and associated with the residential use of. property.
Ho
Bay windows, provided the encroachment within the yard area does not
exceed eight (8) square feet and provided the setback of the principal
wall conforms to district setback requirements.
Subd. 4.' Buildings may be excluded from side yard requirements if party walls
are utilized or if the adjacent buildings are planned to be constructed as an integral
structure and a conditional use permit is secured.
Subd. 5. Corner Lots. Lots which abut on more than one street shall provide
required front yards along every street except for lots of record which shall provide~r~
side yard setback abutting the street based on the lot width as follows:
Lot Width
40-50 feet
,. 51-80 feet
....." 81 feet or more
Minimum Side Yard Setback
On Corner Lots
,.."'"10 feet
//20 feet
/
30 feet
2/5/00
28
Mound City Code 350.440, Subd. 6
15'
1----1
I.
E~
L__I
STREET
Lot Width - 40'
15'
~ 120'I :6'!
I
30'
{front)
STREET
100'
-;' 30' i10i ~
:30'
STREET.
Lot Width - 60' Lot Width - 100'
Corner Lots -Minimum Sideyard Setback
Subd. 6. Where adjoining structures existing on the effective date of this
Ordinance have a shorter setback from that required, the front setback of a new
structu~ shall conform to the average of the setback observed by the adjoining houses
on either side, but not closer than twenty (20) feet.
Subd. 7. In all districts, structures shall be fifty (50) feet or more. from the
ordinary high water mark. No structure, except piers and docks, shall be placed at an
elevation such ttmt the lowest floor, including basement floors, is less than the
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation.
Subd. $. No building permit shall be issued for any lot or parcel which does not
abm a de~lieated, improved public street.
Subd. 9, In residential districts, street frontages created by the ~xistenee of fire
lanes havi,ng a width not exceeding 15 feet shall be considered side yards or' rear yards,
as appropriate, and subject to applicable district setbacks, ..'
215100
29
Mound City Code
350.440, Subd. 10
Subd. 10. In residential districts, street frontages created by the existence of alleys,
such alleys having a total width not exceeding 15 feet, shall be considered side yards or
rear yards, as appropriate, and subject to applicable district setbacks.
350.445 Access Drives and Access. ~~
Subd. 1. Access drives may be placed adjacent to property lines except that drives
consisting of crushed rock or other non-finished surfacing shall be no closer than one
(1) foot to any side or rear lot line.
Subd. 2. The number and types of access drives onto major streets may be
controlled and limited in the interests of public safety and efficient traffic flow.
Subd. 3. Access drives onto county roads shall require a review by the County
Engineer. The County Engineer shall determine the appropriate location, size, and
design of such access drives and may limit the number of access drives in the interest of
public safety and efficient traffic flow.
Subd. 4. Access drives to principal structures which traverse wooded, steep, or
open field areas shall be constructed and maintained to a width and base material depth
sufficient to support access by emergency vehicles. The Building Official shall review
all access drives (driveways) for compliance with accepted community access drive
standards. ~t~dfive'.W~y~'shall .haYe' ~minimtmal ~icl..thlof ten '.(l~f feet' wiT~'~a~'pavement
St~amzth oanable'of~alV~ffin~( anw emergency vemmes.
Subd. 5. . All lots or parcels shall have direct adequate physical access for
emergency vehicles along the frontage of the lot or parcel from an existing dedicated
imp.royal public roadway.
3~.450 Residential Minimnm Floor Area Requirements. The following minimum
requirements shall be applied to all new residential dwelling construction:
Subd. 1.
Subd. 2.
Subd. 3.
Single Family Detached Dwellings ........ 840 sq. ft. per dwelling
Two Family Dwellings ....................... 800 sq. ft. per dwelling
Twin Home Dwellings ....................... 840 sq. ft. per dwelling
30
2/5/00
Mound City Code 330.05, Subd. 16
Subd, '16, Subdivider - Any person commencing proceedings under this
ordinance to effect a subdivision of land for himself/herself or for others.
Subd. '17. Subdivision - The separation of an area, parcel or tract of land into
two or more parcels, tracts, lots or long-term leasehold interests where the creation
of the leasehold interests necessitate the creation of streets, roads or alleys for the
residential, commercial, industrial or other use or any combination thereof, except
those separations when a new street is involved, any division of a parcel of land.
The term includes re-subdivision and, when appropriate to the context, shall relate
to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided or adjustment of boundary
~330.10
lines.
(ORD
02-2003, 6/8/03)
Procedural Requirements. Before dividing any tract of land into two or~
more lots or parcels, or adjusting any boundaries not covered by M.S.A.
462.352, Subd. 12, or the procedures set forth in Subsection 330.11 et seq.
shall be followed with the exception of those subdivisions as set forth below:
Minor Boundary Adjustments. The relocation of a boundary line between
two abutting, existing parcels of property; such relocation not causing the
creation of a new parcel or parcels and such relocation not violating the
Zoning Ordinance may be ,approved by the Director of Community
Development and shall be submitted in a form so as to allow for recording at
Hennepin County. At the discretion of the Director of Community
Development, a survey may be required. Should the Director of Community
Development determine that the relocation of a property boundary may have
an adverse effect on either property or may circumvent applicable zoning
requirements the Director of Community Development may require the
boundary adjustment to be processed as a Minor Subdivision.
Waiver of Platting. Any parcel of land, either platted or un-platted, that has
been combined for tax purposes or for other reasons, cannot be
separated or divided without an approved subdivision or a waiver of the
platting requirements of this cbde.
The City has many old subdivisions with small platted lotS which standing
alone do not meet current zoning requirements. Many of these lots have
been combined for tax purposes and for various other reasons, i.e., to create
a building site, to indicate a desire to combine to avoid or reduce special
assessments for improvements, etc.
A waiver of the platting requirement may be granted by the City Council after
receipt of background information provided by City staft. A request for
waiver of the platting requirements shall be signed by the property owner on
forms prepared for and approved by the City Council, which shall include a
6/8/03
I II & ,i,
Mound City Code
33O.lO (B),
provision to reimburse the City for all of its costs. This request or application
for a waiver shall be referred to City Staff for review. The review by staff
shall be conducted to determine if the division or release of the tax
combination and the creating of new Property Identification parcels for tax
and building purposes is in compliance with City Codes and all planning and
zoning standards and objectives. The staff shall prepare written findings and
recommendations for the Council's consideration. The waiver of platting and
the release of the tax combination may be approved if it is determined to be
in compliance with all City codes. The Council may impose conditions to
the waiver and shall require the payment of any deferred or forgiven special
assessments that have been avoided by a tax combination.
The waiver may be granted without public hearings or without referral to the
Planning Commission. Nothing herein shall preclude the staff or Council
from referring the matter to the Planning Commission if it is determined that
their advise will be helpful in determining if the request meets the City's
planning and zoning objectives.
If the application for a waiver of platting requests or requires any variances
from any City Code requirement, the waiver application shall be processed in
accordance with Subsection 330.170 of the City Code and the request shall
be referred to the Planning Commission and processed as any other
variance request under this subdivision code. (ORD. 79-t996 - 8-27-96)
Subdivision Exemption. In any case in which compliance with ~
Subparagraph A and B above will result in an unnecessary hardship to
the property owner and the request is not contrary to the platting
regulations, the City Council may waive such compliance by adoption of a
resolution to that effect and the conveyance may then be recorded. The
Council may, at its option, refer such questions to the Planning
Commission for recommendation before action.
(ORD 02-2003, 6/8/03)
330.15 General Procedure. Whenever any subdivision of land is proposed, before
any contract is made for the sale of any part thereof and before any permit for the erection
of a structure on such proposed subdivision shall be granted, the subdividing owner, or his
authorized agent, shall apply for and secure approval from the City of Mound of such
proposed subdivision in accordance with the following procedure which includes two steps
for a minor subdivision and three steps for a major subdivision.
6/8/03