Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2005-07-26
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City o£Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 2. 3. 4. o Call meeting to order Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments * Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes: July 12, 2005 meeting *B. Approve payment of claims * C. Planning Commission Recommendations 1. Case #05-08 and 05-23 - Minor Subd/Variances(s) - (3) lots 4552 and 4558 Denbigh Road Applicant: Todd Hovren PC Recommendation: Approval with conditions 2. Approve Appointment of Orv Burma to Planning Commission *D Adopt Resolution Approving a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Grant from Hennepin County and Approving Cooperative Agreement *E. Adopt Resolution Accepting a Contamination Cleanup Grant from the Department of Employment and Economic Development and Approving Program Grant Agreement *F.Pass Ordinance to Amend City Code Chapter 375.10 as it relates to Grading, Soil Erosion, and Sedimentation Control *G. Set special budget meeting for August 30, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) Page 2095-2098 2099-2128 2129-2142 2143-2145 2146 2147 2148 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 10. Swearing in of Canine Officer Police Commendations Action authorizing staff to proceed with assessment of goals from Goal Setting Retreat Planning Commission Recommendations A. Case 05-41 - Variance - Fence 5115 Bartlett Blvd. Applicant: Steven Lievers PC Recommendation: Denial B.Case 05-40 - Variances - Lakeside deck/porch replacement with new solarium 3106 Priest Lane Applicant: Becky Anderson PC Recommendation: Denial Co Case 05-42 and 05-43 - Minor Subdivision/Variance(s) - (2) lots 4539 Island View Drive Applicants: Randy Schneewind and Brian Teeters PC Recommendation: Denial D. Review and Approval of Revision(s) to City of Mound Requirements and Foundation As-Built Survey Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Questions and comments from Councilmembers B. Report: 2005 Spring Clean-up Mound Police Department C. Minutes: Fire Commission Meeting June 20, 2005 D. Newsletter: LMCD 2149-2153 2154-2173 2174-2218 2219-2239 2240-2244 2245 2246 2247-2258 2259-2260 11. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. ci(¥ofmound, com. More current meeting COUNCIL BRIEFING July 26, 2005 Schedule: Don't For~et~.! July 26 - 7:15 - HRA regular meeting July 26 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Aug 1 - 12:00- Rotary golf outing Aug 2 - 6:00-9:00 - National Night Out Aug 9 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Aug 9 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Aug 23 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Aug 23 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Aug 30 - 6:30 - 2006 Budget meeting Sept 16 - 6:30-12:00 - Taste of the Lakes - Bayview Event Center Oct 15 - 8:00-3:00 - Fall Recycling Day Oct 17 - Lost Lake District Groundbreaking Nov 1 - 2:00-4:00 - Vaccination Clinic - City Hall Nov 17 - Tree Lighting Ceremony - Lost Lake Greenway Upcoming Absences Sept 23 - 28 Kandis Hanson Conference Ci,ty Hall and Public SafeW Admin Offices Closed Sept 5 Labor Day in the Park- 7:00 Rm. July 28 The Blue Drifters Traditional Bluegrass Human Resources We advertised to replace an Administrative Assistant in the Public Works, Parks and Docks Divisions, and took in about 50 applications. Interviews will take place in about two weeks. Stay cool ............ Kcv~::h~ HOUND CiTY COUNCIL blINUTF_.,~ JULY 12, 2005 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 12, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mike Specht, John Beise and David Osmek. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Sid Inman, Norrine Forrest, Robert Forrest, Derek Hildebrandt, Tim Cross, Mary Opheim, Judy Krzmarzick, Cheryl Martin, Art Mason, Kristin Beise, Dick & Katie Hage Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roil call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which even the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meeting Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve Agenda MOTION by Brown, seconded by Specht to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent Agenda MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to approve the consent agenda. vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. Upon roll call A. Approve minutes of June 28, 2005 and July 5, 2005 meetings. B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $592,563.36. C. Approve Temporary On-Sale 3.2 Beer Permit for V.F.W. for festival on July 17, 2005, beginning at 4:00 p.m. D. Approve permission for consumption of liquor in Mound Bay Park on July 21, 2005 for City Employee Appreciation Event E. Approve Payment Request No. 2 from Buffalo Bituminous in the amount of $208,693.91 for the 2005 Street Reconstruction Project F. Approve Payment Request No. 4 from Magney Construction in the amount of $158,550.86 for Well #8 Pumphouse. G. Approve Contract for Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Grant for Lost Lake/Maxwell Properties -2095- Mound City Council Minutes -July 12, 2005 Ho RESOLUTION NO. 05-105: RESOLUTION MAKING A SELECTION NOT TO WAIVE THE STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PURPOSES 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the a_clenda. Norrine Forrest, 1624 Finch Lane, appeared before the Council to appeal her dock permit being revolked because she didn't have a boat at her dock by the June 29th deadline. Her dock lift motor was broken, along with inclement weather and she didn't get her boat in until June 30th. She has been a resident of Mound and in the dock program for years and is following the city code procedure by writing a letter of appeal to the City Manager. MOTION by Specht, seconded by Brown to refer this appeal to the Dock Commission for consideration. All voted in favor. Motion carried. It was noted that Ms. Forrest will continue to use her dock until this matter is resolved. 6. Consideration/Adoption of Resolution Awarding the Sale of Approximately $3,875,000 Taxable GO Temporary Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2005D Mayor Meisel turned the meeting over to Acting Mayor Osmek because of a possible perceived conflict of interest. Acting Mayor Osmek announced that the next order of business was consideration of the proposals which have been received for the purchase of the City's approximately $3,875,000 Taxable General Obligation Temporary Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2005D. Ehlers & Associates, Inc., the financial advisor of the City, presented a tabulation of the proposals that had been received in the manner specified in the Official Terms of Proposal for the Bonds. After due consideration of the proposals, Member Brown Ithen introduced the following written resolution, the reading of which was dispensed with by unanimous consent, and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 05-106: A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF APPROXIMATELY $3,875,000 TAXABLE GENERAL OBLIGATION TEMPORARY TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 2005D; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Specht, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Brown, Specht, Beise and Osmek; and the following voted against the same: None. Mayor -2096- Mound City Council Minutes -July 12, 2005 Meisel abstained from voting, whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Mayor Meisel returned to preside over the remainder of the meeting. 7. Public Hearing Case #05-36: CUPNariance for drive-thru pharmacy pickup window: Applicant beinq Dave Leonard (Snyder's Druq Store) Sarah Smith reviewed the request by Snyder's Drug Store for a CUP to allow a pick-up window on the west side of the freestanding building in Mound MarketPlace, and a variance as required as drive-in businesses must be located 400 feet from a church/school/residential district. Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. and asked for public comment. The applicant offered to answer any questions. Osmek stated that at the Planning Commission it was brought up that a drive-thru there fits in with the building layout. Upon no further comment, Mayor Meisel closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Specht to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 05-107: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATION FROM SNYDERS DRUG STORES, INC. TO ALLOW INSTALLATION OF A DRIVE-UP PICKUP WINDOW IN THE FREESTANDING BUILDING IN MOUND MARKETPLACE SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 2125-2129 COMMERCE BOULEVARD. P&Z CASE #05-36. PID #14- 117-24-41-0088. 8. Liquor Store Manager John Colotti with Harbor Wine & Spirits Semi-Annual Report John Colotti presented a report to the Council with charts of revenue comparisons of 2003 through 2005 to date, along with store traffic numbers. He stressed that the store is recovering well from the CSAH 15 construction period in 2004. The report is available in the City Clerk's office. 9. Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Questions or comments from Councilmembers - Brown asked the Boy Scout in the audience to introduce himself. Derek Hildebrandt came forward and informed the council that he is working for a star, then the Life Award, followed by Eagle Scout. He is attending the Council meeting to finish is citizenship merit badge. The Council welcomed him and thanked him for attending. B. Report: Contribution of Gambling Funds - Mohawk Jaycees ($2000 for Skate Park and $500 for Adopt A Green Space) -2097- Mound City Council Minutes -July 12, 2005 Harbor Wine & Spirits June 2005 and §340A.602 Update on Carbone's/Dailey's Pub liquor licenses C. Correspondence: Andy Burmeister, Regional Affairs & Policy Liaison 10. Adiourn MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 8:18 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2098- JULY 26, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 071305S U E $680.00 JULY 071805SU E $215.00 JULY 072005SU E $1,309.98 JULY 072105SUE $6,591.62 JULY 072505OR. CARD $3,549.51 JULY 072605SUE $338,936.07JULY TOTAL $351,282.18 -2099- CiTY OF MOUND Batch Name 071305SUE Payments City of Mound Payments 07/13/05 10:48 AM Page 1 Current Period: July 2005 User Dollar Amt $680.00 Computer Dollar Amt $680.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 71305 BREEZY POINT CONFERENCE CE Cash Payment E 101-42115-434 Conference & Training 09-18-05 CONFERENCE,MCKINLEY $480.00 Invoice 071305 7/13/2005 PO 19088 Transaction Date 7/13/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $480.00 Refer 71305 MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPER Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 07-26-05 REGISTRATION SKINNER $200.00 Invoice 071305 7/13/2005 PO 19054 Transaction Date 7/1312005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 602 SEWER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $480.00 $200.00 $680.00 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $680.00 $680.00 -2100- City of Mound 07/21/05 8:38 AM Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: July 2005 Batch Name 071805SUE PaYment Computer DollarAmt $215.00 Posted Refer 71805 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Ck# 018884 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs ELECTRICAL CONDUIT PERMIT $215.00 Invoice 071805 7/18/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $215.00 Fund Summary BATCH Total $215.00 10100 Wells Fargo 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $215.00 $215,00 Pre-Written Check $215.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $215.00 -2101 - CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 072005SUE Payments City of MOund Payments 07/18/05 9:53 AM Page I Current Period: July 2005 User Dollar ATt $1,309.98 Computer Dollar ATt $1,309.98 $0.00 In Balance Refer 72005 FAMOUS DAVES BBQ E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 7/20/2005 7/14/2005 Cash Payment Invoice 072005 Transaction Date 07-21-05 EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION $1,225.27 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,225.27 Refer 72005 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs ELECTRICAL CONDUIT PERMIT $50.00 Invoice 072005 7/20/2005 Transaction Date 7118/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 72005 T-MOBILE CELL PHONE Cash Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 07-03-05 612-221-5813 $34.71 Invoice 072005 7/20/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $34.71 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 40t GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 10100 Wells Fargo $1,225.27 $34.71 $50.00 $1,309.98 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $1,309.98 $1,309,98 -2102- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 072105SUE Payments City of Mound Payments 07/19/05 3:36 PM Page 1 Refer 72105 Cash Payment invoice 072105 Cash Payment invoice 072105 Cash Payment Invoice 072105 Cash Payment invoice 072105 Cash Payment Invoice 072105 Cash Payment Invoice 072105 Cash Payment invoice 072105 Cash Payment invoice 072105 Current Period: July 2005 User Dollar Amt $6,591.62 Computer Dollar Amt $6,591.62 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA $0.00 07-05 952-472-0600 07-05 952-472-0622 07-05 952-472-3555 07-05 952-472-0635 07-05 952-472-0635 07-05 952-472-0635 07-05 952-472-0646 07-05 952-472-0648' In Balance $1,062.40 $442.67 $265.59 $546.82 $546.82 $546.82 $19.41 $631.76 E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 7/21/2005 O,,,~.__ransaction Date 7/19/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,062.29 Refer 72105 MOUND POST OFFICE Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage 07-05 UTILITY BILLING $120.84 invoice 072105 7/21/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450~322 Postage 07-05 UTILITY BILLING $120.83 invoice 072105 7/21/2005 Transaction Date ' 7/19/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $241,67 Refer 72105 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (POL Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 06-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $2.287.66 Invoice 072105 7/21/2005 Transaction Date 7/19/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,287.66 -2103- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND City of Mound Payments 07/19/05 3:36 PM Page 2 Current Period: July 2005 10100 Wells Fargo $4,358.96 $265.59 $667.66 $667.65 $631.76 $6,591.62 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $6,591.62 $6,591.62 -2104- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 072505CRCARD Payment City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:39 AM Page 1 Current Period: July 2005 Computer DollarAmt $3,549.51 Posted Refer 72505 ELAN CREDIT CARD Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment 072505 E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 7/25/2005 E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense 7/25/2OO5 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 7/25/2O05 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 7/25/2005 E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 7/25/2005 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow 7/25/2005 PO 18974 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 PO 18972 E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous 7/25/2005 E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 101-45200-434 Conference & Training 7/25/2005 E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 101-43100-430 Miscellaneous 7/25/2005 E 602-49450-430 Miscellaneous 7/25/2005 E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 7/25/2005 E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 7/25/2005 Ck# 099115 7/25/2005 06-12-05 RUTTGERS CREDIT 06-23-5 SUBWAY 06-23-05 S.A. BLDG SEARCH CLASS 06-22-50 SCOTTY B'S SOJOURNER 06-14-05 SCOTTY B'S BLDG SEARCH CLASS 06~26-05 MENARDS MISC TOOLS 06-22-50 WORKPLACE PRO SHRITS 06-14-05 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING LIQUID SMOKE 0-6-19~05 INET 7 06-09-05 EBAY CHARGE 1969 MACK PUMPBER 06-08-05 DELL COMPUTER HANSON,RAY 06-29-05 HYDROLOGIC WATER MANAGEMENT 06-28-05 SYS*SYMANTEC 07-04-05 MYWEATHER RECURRING 07-04-05 MYWEATHER RECURRING 06-29-05 THRESHOLD 06-06-05 DELL COMPUTER HANSON,RAY 06-23-05 ICMA INTERNET 06-08-05 DELL COMPUTER,HANSON,RAY 06-08-05 DELL COMPUTER,HANSON,RAY 06-13-05 VERIZON CELL CASE -$173.I9 $76.52 $38.29 $21.90 $22.17 $124.06 $395.40 $236.70 $31.95 $89.05 $328.56 $99.05 $26.57 $1.96 $1.99 $56.98 $328.56 $540.00 $328,56 $328.56 $21,29 -2105- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Cash Payment Invoice 072505 Transaction Date Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:39 AM Page 2 Current Period: July 2005 E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 06-25-05 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST. $127.76 7/25/2005 E 601-49400-430 Miscellaneous 7/25/2005 E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training 7/25/2005 E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies 7/25/2005 7/12/2005 Due 0 LOUIS PARK 07-04-05 MYWEATHER RECURRING 06-24-05 THRESHOLD ART 06-08-05 GFOA 2004 REPORT REVIEW 06-28-05 SYM*SYMANTEC Wells Fargo 10100 $1.98 $53.25 $415.00 $26.57 Total $3,549.51 10100 Wells Fargo $2,611.80 $276.62 $330.54 $330.55 BATCH TOtal $3,549.51 $3,549.51 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $3,549.51 $0.00 $3,549.51 -2106- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 1 Payments Batch Name 072605SUE Payments Current Period: July 2005 User Dollar Amt $338,936.07 Computer Dollar Amt $338,936.07 $0.00 In Balance Refer 72605 A-1 RENTAL OF LAKE MINNETONK Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts HAMMER DRILL $19.91 Invoice 24281 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/19/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19.91 Refer 72605 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-05 STREET CANS $23.60 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $20.70 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-46200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-05 1-3 YARD REAR LOAD CONTAINER $341.65 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $39.34 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $39.34 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 06-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $39.35 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $84,28 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $84.27 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $672.53 Refer 72505 AMUNDSON, M. LLP Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $1,095.34 invoice 183292 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,095.34 Refer 72605 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438519214 · 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438519918 7/26/2005 $161.44 $157.90 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $319.34 Refer 72605 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 05-21-05 THRU 06-17-05 MOUND HARBOR $19,041.41 RENAISSANCE Invoice #3 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19,041.41 Refer 72605 BEDELL, STEVE Cash Payment G 101-23007 Erosion Control Escrow Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 ate 7/14/2005 Refer 72605 BELLBOY CORPORATI.ON Cash Payment E 809-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE Invoice 40203000 7/26/2005 5463 BARTLETT BLVD EROSION ESCROW $1,000.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00 $103.4.0 -2107- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: July 2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 33843600 7/2612005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 33861000 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale invoice 33902000 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R Invoice 40220900 7~26~2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 33936400 7/26/2005 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 2 I ~ LIQUOR $894.05 LIQUOR $1,940.65 LIQUOR $1,154.36 MERCHANDISE $96.47 LIQUOR $3,209.85 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,398.78 Refer 72605 BIFFS,/NC PORTABLE RESTRO0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $234.26 $434.52 $234.26 $903,04 Invoice W260805 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W260806 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410..Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W260807 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/1112005 06-08-05 THRU 07-05-05 CENTERVIEW BEACH 06-08-05 THRU 07-05-05 MOUND BAY PARK 06-08-05 THRU 07-05-05 CITY HALL Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 72605 BOSMA WESTONKA CARPET CLE Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building RePair Supplies 07-19-05 CARPET CLEANING $172.53 Invoice 6709 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $172.53 Refer 72605 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery HEUI PUMP DEFECT $91.18 Invoice 424677 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $91,18 Refer 72605 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 7W RV BLD TO 4W ADP $11.36 Invoice N57978 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11.36 Refer 72605 CA T AND FIDDLE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $116.00 invoice 41373 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/19/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $116.00 Rear 72605 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 05-20-05 THRU 06-21-05 #543-000-053-000 $33.24 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities 05-20-05 THRU 06-21-05 #543-001-095-800 $49.19 Invoice 072605 7/26~2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities 05-20-05 THRU 06-21-05 #543-001-853-000 $426.92 Invoice 072605 7~26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities 05-20-05 THRU 06-21-05 #543-001-972-603 $30.33 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities 05-20-05 THRU 06-21-05 #543-001-972-603 $17.23 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 -2108- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 3 Current Period: July 2005 E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities 05-20-05 THRU 06-21-05 #543-001-972-603 $21.37 7/28/2005 E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities 05-20-05 THRU 06-21-05 #543-004-818-801 $21.13 7/26/2005 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59D.41 Refer 72605 CHADWICK AND MER'I-Z Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 06-05 PROSECUTION SERVICES $6,100.45 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 · Total $6,100.45 Refer 72605 CITIES DIGITAL SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2005 LASERFtCHE ANNUAL SUPPORT $596.00 Invoice 1738 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $596.00 Refer 72605 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, Cash Payment E 601-49400-328 Employment Advertising 06-18-05 THRU 07-02-05 ADMIN ASSISTANT $142.20 invoice 45513 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-328 Employment Advertising 06-18-05 THRU 07-02-05 ADMIN ASSISTANT $142.20 Invoice 45513 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous 06-18~05 ADMIN ASSISTANT $71.10 Invoice 45513 7/26/2005 Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $355.50 Refer 72605 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $519.30 Invoice 81084069 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $519.30 Refer 72605 COMPUTER CHEQUE Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 06-05 CHECK VERIFICATION $109.00 Invoice 106850605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.00 Refer 72605 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 06-05 COPIER MAINTENANCE $347.80 invoice 62216 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $347.80 Refer 72605 CRYSTEEL DISTRIBUTING, INC. Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #2974 MIRROR BRACKETS $1,978.87 Invoice F20523 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,978.87 Refer 72605 CUSTOMIZED EMBROIDERY, INC Cash Payment E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING WITH LOGO $51.00 Invoice 1040 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING WITH LOGO $51.00 Invoice 1040 7/26/2005 )Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING WITH LOGO $51.00 Invoice 1040 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING WITH LOGO $51.00 invoice 1040 7/26/2005 -2109- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 7/2012005 City of Mound 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 4 Payments Current Period: July 2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $204.00 Refer 72605 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,120.00 Invoice 321789 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $62.35 invoice 321790 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,146.20 Invoice 322756 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $84.80 invoice 322757 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,4t3.35 Refer 72605 DYNAMEX DELIVERS NOW Cash Payment G 601-16100 Fixed Asset-Land 07-07-05 DELIVERY $33.44 Invoice 1125126 7/26~2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $33.44 Refer 72605 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,788.45 Invoice 228356 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $33.00 Invoice 228357 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $22.00 Invoice 228450 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,311.15 invoice 228449 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,154.60 Refer 72605 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment Invoice 24146 Cash Payment Invoice 24146 Transaction Date G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 7/26/2005 E 401-46590-300 Professional Srvs 7/26/2005 7/18/2005 06-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE 06-05 KEY FINANCIAL STRATEGIES SESSION Ill/IV Wells Fargo 10100 $450,00 $10,000.00 Total $10,450.00 Refer 72605 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT AN Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts GUTTER BROOMS $809.40 Invoice 5087 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $809.40 Refer 72605 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES Cash Payment G 601-16100 Fixed Asset-Land RELOCATION CONSULTANT 2355 CHATEAU $70.00 Invoice 00-7157 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.00 Refer 72605 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft. Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $64.00 Invoice 321676 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $128.00 Invoice 320527 7/26~2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.00 -2110- City of Mound 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page5 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: July 2005 Refer 72605 Cash Payment Invoice 83708 Cash Payment Invoice 83709 Cash Payment Invoice 83705 Cash Payment Invoice 83705 Cash Payment Invoice 83705 FIRE CONTROL EXTINGUISHER E 101 _-41910-401 Repairs/Uaint Buildings 2005 ANNUAL SERVICE 7/26/2005 E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 2005 ANNUAL SERVICE 7/26/2005 E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies 2005 ANNUAL SERVICE 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies 2005 ANNUAL SERVICE 7/26/2005 E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies 2005 ANNUAL SERVICE 7126/2005 $95.70 $45.00 $120.79 $120.79 $120,78 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $503.06 Refer 72605 FRESHWATER HARVESTING Cash Payment E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maint Contract GREENWAY CHANNEL LOST LAKE $800.00 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $800.00 Refer 72605 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-21-05 UNIFORMS $32.28 Invoice 6490794 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-21-05 UNIFORMS $19.76 ;Invoice 6490794 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-21-05 UNIFORMS $28,13 Invoice 6490794 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-21-05 UNIFORMS $9.20 Invoice 6490794 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 06-21-05 MATS $39.78 Invoice 6490794 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 06-21-05 MATS $39.78 invoice 6490794 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 06-21-50 MATS $39.78 Invoice 6490794 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 07-05-05 MATS $51.73 Invoice 6503471 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 07-05-05 MATS $97.87 Invoice 6503472 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 07-05-05 MATS $44.38 Invoice 6503468 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100,218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-05-05 UNIFORMS $36.88 Invoice 6503470 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-05-05 UNIFORMS $36.88 Invoice 6503470 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-05-05 UNIFORMS $36.89 Invoice 6503470 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-05-05 UNIFORMS $9.70 Invoice 6503470 7/26/2005 Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 07-05~05 MATS $27.85 nvoice 6503470 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 07-05-05 MATS $27.85 Invoice 6503470 7/26/2005 -2111- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 07-05-05 MATS Invoice 6503470 7/26/2005 b~si~ F~n-en~-' -E ~01~,5~C}0'-2~2-3 B--uiidi"-g Repair S-u~plies 0'~¥~0~ M,~,~ 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 6 Current Period: July 2005 $27.85 $22.10 Invoice 6516037 7126/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 07-19-05 MATS $128.81 invoice 6516038 7~26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 07-19-05 MATS $28.02 Invoice 6516031 7/2612005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-28-05 UNIFORMS $50.32 Invoice 6497127 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-28-05 UNIFORMS $22.65 Invoice 6497127 7126/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-28-05 UNIFORMS $28.13 Invoice 6497127 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-28-05 UNIFORMS $9.20 Invoice 6497127 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 06-28-05 MATS $26.64 Invoice 6497127 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 06-28-05 MATS $26.64 Invoice 6497127 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 06-28-05 MATS $26.64 Invoice 6497127 712612005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-12-05 UNIFORMS $56,36 Invoice 6509721 712612005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-12-05 UNIFORMS $20.77 Invoice 6509721 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-12-05 UNIFORMS $34,76 invoice 6509721 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 07-12-05 UNIFORMS $9.70 Invoice 6509721 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 07-12-05 MATS $25.79 Invoice 6509721 712612005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 07-12-05 MATS $25.79 Invoice 6509721 7~26~2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 07-12-05 MATS $25.79 invoice 6509721 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7~20~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,174.70 Refer 72605 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICER Cash Payment E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 2005 ANNUAL CONFERENCE $200.00 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 PO 18642 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Rear 72605 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$188.00 Invoice 670094 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-4'9750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.00 Invoice 257347 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $573.40 Invoice 257693 7/26/2005 -2112- City of Mound //"~ ~ % Payments / ~ \ CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 257391 07/21/05 8:30 AM Pa[~e 7 Current Period: July 2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,541.66 7/26/2005 Cash Payment Invoice 256975 Cash Payment invoice 261127 Cash Payment Invoice 261126 Cash Payment Invoice 670912 Transaction Date E 609"49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6.334..34 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $549.71 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,293.03 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$45.50 7/26/2005 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,058,64 Refer 72605 HA TCHETT, JIM~JUDY Cash Payment G 101-23032 2128 Centerview Ln #054~3 REIMBURSE ESCROW $332.50 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $332.50 Refer 72605 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals CONTAINERS (6) $30.00 Invoice DM119291 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 72605 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic CHIPPER $65.98 Invoice 60872 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101"43100"440 Other Contractual Servic BIG TRAILER TUBE $120,13 Invoice 60932 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186.11 Refer 72605 HENNEPIN COUNTY G/S USER GR Cash Payment E 101-42400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2005 MEMBERSHIP DUES $2.50 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2005 MEMBERSHIP DUES $2.50 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2005 MEMBERSHIP DUES $2.50 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602"49450-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2005 MEMBERSHIP DUES $2.50 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.00 Refer 72605 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609"49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $232.85 Invoice 364487 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/19/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $232.85 Refer 72605 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $603.42 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 06-50 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE $1.224.18 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 MISC PLANNING $708.78 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 -2113- City of Mound 07/21/05 8:30 AM ~/',~' ~ Payments Pac~e 8 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: July 2005 Cash Payment G 101-23047 1645 Eagle Lane ~)5-18119 06-05 1643 EAGLE LANE #05-18/#05-19 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 $390.00 Cash Payment G 101-23048 4957 Islandview Drive #05-2 06-05 ISLANDVIEW DRIVE #05-22 $195.00 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs . 06-05 MOUND VISIONS $5,602.57 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound.Harbor Renaissance 06-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $1,300.75 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,024..70 Refer 72605 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 RepaidMaint Supply SAFETY FENCE Invoice 012556/3124637 712612005 PO 19074 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts SAFETY FENCE Invoice 014530/1133398 7126/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 72605 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 06-24-05 THRU 07-24-05 COPIER MAINTENANCE Invoice 23775288 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Rear 72605 Cash Payment Invoice 18772 Cash Payment Invoice 18793 Cash Payment invoice 18822 Cash Payment Invoice 18907 Transaction Date Refer ISLAND PARK SKELL Y E 101-42400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TAURUS OIL CHANGE 7/26/2005 E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2002 CHEV SILVERADO OIL CHANGE 7/26/2005 E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #189 FREON RECHARGE 7/26/2005 E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2004 SUPERDUTY MIRRORS 7/26~2005 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 72605JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 7/26~2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 7/2612005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 7/26/2005 Cash Payment Invoice 1925185 Cash Payment Invoice 1925184 Cash Payment Invoice 1925183 Cash Payment Invoice 1927876 Cash Payment Invoice 1927875 Cash Payment Invoice 1927874 Cash Payment Invoice 1927873 Cash Payment Invoice 1928124 $85.11 $207.36 Total $292.47 $166.61 Total $166.61 $25.86 $21.00 $255.75 $56.57 Total $359.18 $2,377.55 $710.75 $862.15 $541.26 $694.80 $162.00 $1,750.03 $427,50 -2114- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 286337 City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 9 Current Period: July 2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIUQOR -$12.30 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Refer 72605 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment Invoice 072606 Cash Payment Invoice 072606 Cash Payment Invoice 072606 Transaction Date Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,513,.74 E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 07-08-05 LEMONS FOR RESALE $14.08 7/26/2006 E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 07-13-05 LIMES FOR RESALE $21.35 7/26/2006 E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 07-16-05 LIMES FOR RESALE $12.02 7/26/2006 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.45 Refer 72605 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 05-04 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $27.50 Invoice 66829 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 06-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $814.00 Invoice 66629 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 06-05 MOURD HARBOR RENAISSANSCE $3,517.92 Invoice 66829 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/19/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,359.42 Refer 72605 KOENIG AND SCHWERT Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2004/2005 CBD #14-117-24-44-0004 $387.33 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $387.33 Refer 72605 LAFAYETTE CLUB Cash Payment E 101-41110-434 Conference & Training 06-21-05 MEETING $511.67 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $511.67 Refer 72605 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment G 101-23055 2125 Commerce #05-36 Sny 07-02-05 SNYDER APPLICATION $41.79 Invoice 7205 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 07-09-05 ORDINANCE 311-2005 $135.32 Invoice 7205 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $177.11 Refer 72605 LAKER/PIONEER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 609-49750-340Advertising Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 07-04-05 DISPLAY AD $59.00 Wells Fargo 101 O0 Total $59.00 Refer 72605 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising Invoice 00109176 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 07-12-05 COLUMN AD Wells Fargo 10100 $80.00 Total $80.00 Refer 72605 LARSON PRINTING AND GRAPHIC Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2004/2005 CBD #13-117-24-33-0047 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 $292,23 Total $292.23 Refer 72605 LAUER, ROBERT DR. -2115- City of Mound 07/21/05 8:30 AM CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Payments Page 10 Current Period: July 2005 E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2004/2050 CBD #13-117-24-33-0015 $748,.15 7/2612005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $748.15 Refer 72605 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials NUT/BOLTS $122.18 Invoice 3397058 7~26~2005 PO 19200 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials NUT/BOLTS $122.18 Invoice 3397058 712612005 PO 19200 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials NUT/BOLTS $122.18 Invoice 3397058 7/26/2005 PO 19200 Transaction Date 711112005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $366;.54 Refer 72605 LHB ENGINERS AND ARCHITECTS Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 01-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $6,093.63 Invoice 0000004 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,093.63 Refer 72605 LUEBKE, MICHAEl/JENNIFER Cash Payment G 601-11520 Accts Receivable-Customer REFUND OVERPAYMENT $24.56 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.56 Refer 72605 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,620.05 Invoice 817861 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $57.60 Invoice 820426 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,908.22 invoice 820425 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-25.2 Beer For Resale BEER $58.80 invoice 820427 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,644.67 Refer 72605 MA YER DISTRIBUTING Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic FILTER DRUM $23.33 invoice 9461 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic FILTER DRUM $23.33 Invoice 9461 7/2612005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic FILTER DRUM $23.34 Invoice 9461 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.00 Refer 72605 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI Cash Payment E 427-43121-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 2005 SEAL COAT PROJECT $519.00 Invoice 51789 7/26/2005 Project 06173 Cash Payment G 101-23008 2020 Commerce Parking Lot 06-05 2020 COMMERCE PARKING LOT $987.00 invoice 51790 7/26/2005 Project 11894 Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 06-05 2355 CHATEAU WATERTOWER $561.00 Invoice 51791 7/26/2005 Project PW0506 Cash Payment E 455-43255-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 MCES LIFT STATION $561.00 Invoice 51792 7/26/2005 Project 13132 -2116- City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 51793 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 11 Current Period: July 2005 G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 06-05 WELL PUMPHOUSE $6,574..62 7/26/2005 Project PW0505 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 NPDES PHASE II MS4 PERMITTING $80.00 Invoice 51794 7/26/2005 Project 14137 Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $2,892.50 Invoice 51795 7/26/2005 Project 14615 Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 2004 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $2,128.25 Invoice 51796 7/26/2005 Project 14707 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 STORM SEWER PROJECT $102.00 Invoice 51797 7/26/2005 Project PW0509 Cash Payment E 401-43103-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 2005 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $36,753.25 Invoice 51798 7/26/2005 Project 15000 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 BAYRIDGE ROAD EASEMENT $2,898,50 Invoice 51799 7/26/2005 Project 15127 Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 06-05 STANDPIPE DEVON LANE $357.00 Invoice 51800 7/26/2005 Project 15139 Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 2005 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $4,341.00 Invoice 51801 7/26/2005 Project PW0502 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 RECORD STREET PLANS $420.60 Invoice 51802 7/26/2005 Project 15238 Cash Payment G 101-23042 5337 Shoreline ¢05-12 S.A. 06-05 5377 SHORELINE DRIVE ¢05-26 $647.50 Invoice 51803 7/26/2005 Project 15324 Cash Payment G 101-23048 4957 Islandview Ddve #05-2 06-05 4957 ISLANDVlEW DRIVE #05-22 $102.00 Invoice 51804 7/26/2005 Project 15342 Cash Payment G 101-23052 Commerce Place CUP, #05- 06-05 COMMERCE PLACE PARKING LOT $51.00 Invoice 51805 7/26/2005 Project 15343 Cash Payment G 101-23050 5331 Three Points Blvd-¢05- 06-05 5331 THREE POINTS BLVD #05-24 $5t ,00 Invoice 51806 7/26/2005 Project 15344 Cash Payment G 101-23049 5341 Three Points Blvd4¢05- 06-05 5341 THREE POINTS BLVD ¢05-25 $79.00 Invoice 51807 7/26/2005 Project 15345 Cash Payment G 101-23058 3106 Priest Lane #05-40 Don 06-05 3106 PRIEST LANE #05-40 $51.00 Invoice 51808 7/26/2005 Project 15368 Cash Payment G 101-23055 2125 Con~merce ¢05-36 Sny 06-05 2125 COMMERCE BLVD #05-36 $153.00 Invoice 51809 7/26/2005 Project 15369 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 06-05 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $153.00 Invoice 51810 7/26/2005 Project 15372 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 FORWARD TO SMITH $255.00 Invoice 51811 7/26/2005 Project 15374 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 4712 RICHMOND ROAD EXTENSION $1,372.50 Invoice 51812 7/26/2005 Project 15375 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 LAND SWAP RAILROAD TIF 1-2 $235.00 Invoice 51813 7/26/2005 Project 15382 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 5951 LYNWOOD STREET VACATION $153.00 Invoice 51814 7/26/2005 Project 15468 Cash Payment G 101-23061 5776 Bartlett Blvd #05-45 Sk 06-05 5776 BARTLETT BLVD #05-45 $153.00 Invoice 51815 7/26/2005 Project 15469 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 4685 WlLSHIRE BLVD #04-40 $153.00 51816 7/26/2005 Project 15470 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $62,784.72 Refer 72605 MEISEL, PAT -2117- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 072605 City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 12 Current Period: July 2005 E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 2004/2005 CBD #14-117-24-44-0006 $1,375.32 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,375.32 Refer 72605 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 02-05 SAC CHARGES $1,435.50 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 602-21825 SAC Deposits 06-05 SAC CHARGES $1,435.50 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 08-05 WASTWATER $42,762.78 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/1112005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45,633.78 Refer 72605 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment E 609-49750-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 06-13-05WASH WINDOWS OUT $37.28 Invoice 710017631 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.28 Refer 72605 MINNESOTA DEPT NA TURAL RES Cash Payment E 222-42260-500 Capital Outlay FA #8043 MAINTENANCE TRUCK $900.00 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $900.00 Refer 72605 MINNESOTA DEPT PUBLIC SAFET Cash Payment E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 2ND QTR CJDN APRIL,MAY,JUNE $630.00 Invoice P07MN02713005 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.00 Refer 72605 MINNESOTA MICRO MEDICINE Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous 06-06-05 HUGHES, TIM $180.00 Invoice 1499-G 7/16/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.00 Refer 72605 MINNETONKA CUSTOM HOMES Cash Payment G 101-22976 3064 Alexander#03-52 Sub- REFUND/CLOSE ESCROW $4,867.50 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 . Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,867.50 Refer 72605 MINUTEMAN PRESS Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $35.68 Invoice 5749 7/26/2005 PO 18398 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $35.68 Invoice 5749 7/26/2005 PO 18398 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $35.68 Invoice 5749 7/26/2005 PO 18398 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $35.68 Invoice 5749 7/26/2005 PO 18398 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $35.68 Invoice 5749 7/26/2005 PO 18398 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $11.91 Invoice 5749 7/26/2005 PO 18398 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $23.79 Invoice 5749 7/26/2005 PO 18398 -2118- City of Mound 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 13 Payments - L.- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 5749 Current Period: July 2005 E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES $23.79 7/26/2005 PO 18398 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $237.89 Refer 72605 MORAN USA, LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise Fo; R MERCHANDISE $230.60 Invoice 262498 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.60 Refer 72605 MORRELL AND MORRELL, INCOR Cash Payment E 670-49500-460 Janitorial Services 06-24-05 CHARGES $66.37 Invoice 9507 7/26/2005 , Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66,37 Refer 72605 MOUND CRIME PREVENTION Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow BUY A BRICK $75.00 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $75.00 Refer 72605 MOUND FIRE RELIEF A SSOCIA TIe Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 07-05 FIRE RELIEF $9,883.33 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Refer 72605 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9.883.33 08-05 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE $850.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $850.00 Refer 72605 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS Cash Payment Invoice 107223 Cash Payment Invoice 107703 Cash Payment Invoice 107923 Cash Payment Invoice 108259 Transaction Date E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 7/26/2005 7/12/2005 06-13-05 BLACKTOP 06-21-05 BLACKTOP 06-24-05 BACKTOP 06-30-05 BLACKTOP Wells Fargo 10100 Total $207.61 $48.04 $221.05 $145.37 $622.07 Refer 72605 NATIONAL WATERWORKS Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply - FLEX CPLG CLXCI/PVC Invoice 2513866 7126/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply FLEX CPLG CLXCI/PVC Invoice 2513866 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY Invoice 2489794 7/26/2005 PO 19072 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply CURB STOPS Invoice 2540969 7/26/2005 PO 19201 $88.49 $0.00 $1,907.12 $939.68 ,~,,Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,935.29 I~lRefer 72605 NEW FRANCE WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $399.00 Invoice 32157 7/26/2005 -2119- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 32166 City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 14 Current Period: July 2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $89.00 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 711812005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $488.00 Refer 72605 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply TELESCOPING WAND $141,62 Invoice 117628 7/26/2005 PO 18915 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $141.62 Rear 72605 NS/I MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 05-05THRU 08-05 MAINTENANCE $980.00 AGREEMENT 7/26/2005 E 101-43100-223 Building Repair Supplies CLEAN CONDENSING UNIT 7/26/2005 PO 19071 E 601-49400-223 Building Repair Supplies CLEAN CONDENSING UNIT 7/26/2005 PO 19071 E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies CLEAN CONDENSING UNIT 7/26/2005 PO 19071 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Invoice 76962 Cash Payment Invoice 69256 Cash Payment Invoice 69256 Cash Payment Invoice 69256 Transaction Date Total $998.67 $998.67 $998.66 $3,976.00 Refer 72605 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-002 7~26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555128-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555138-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 292826331-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 292826331-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 292826331-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-001 7/2612005 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE INDEX CARDS,ETC INDEX CARDS,ETC INDEX CARDS,ETC MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $1.30 $1.30 $1.30 $1.30 $1.30 $0.45 $0.87 $O.87 $16.04 $16,03 $19.56 $19.56 $9.77 $52.08 $52.08 -2120- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 15 Current Period: July 2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-001 7/26/2005 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $52.08 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101--43100-200 Office Supplies invoice 295750788-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295750788-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45250-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 293895088-001 7/26/2005 PO 18397 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies invoice 295237635-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295237635-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 295237635-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies ~ Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555050-001 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies invoice 295124822-001 7/26/2005 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES BOARDS FOR MAPS STORAGE BOXES STORAGE BOXES STORAGE BOXES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES EASEL PAD INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE,BATTERiES $52.08 $52.08 $17.38 $34.72 $34.72 $152.27 $11.86 $tl.86 $11.86 $1.98 $1.98 $1.98 $1.98 $1.98 $O.68 $I .32 $1.32 $34.30 $19.29 $106.08 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $797.61 Refer 72605 OFFICEMAX#32 Cash Payment E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J 144 7/26/2005 INK JET CARTRIDGE $32.99 BADGE SUPPLIES $7.00 BADGE SUPPLIES $7.00 -2121 - CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7~26/2005 City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 16 Current Period: July 2005 BADGE SUPPLIES $7.00 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7/2612005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 7914J144 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 BADGE SUPPLIES $7.00 BADGE SUPPLIES $7.00 BADGE SUPPLIES $2.31 BADGE SUPPLIES $4.68 BADGE SUPPLIES $4.68 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $79.66 Refer 72605 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 06-05 LOCATES $126.35 Invoice 5060573 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 06-05 LOCATES $126.35 Invoice 5060573 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $252.70 Refer 72605 PAUL A WALRDON, ASSOC (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222-42260-308 Building Inspection Fees 06-09-05 THRU 07-13-05 FIRE INSPECTIONS $530.00 invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $530.00 Refer 72605 PAUL A. WALDRON & ASSOCIATE Cash Payment E 101-42400-308 Building Inspection Fees 06-09-05 THRU 07-13-05 BLDG INSPECTIONS $1,140.00 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23061 5776 Bartlett Blvd #05-45 Sk 5776 BARTLETT #05-45 COMMENT FORM $40.00 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23060 4539 Islandview Dr #05-42/4 4539 IsLANDVIEW DRIVE #05-42/#05-43 $40.00 COMMENT FORM Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 101~22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT COMMENT $40.00 FORM Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23049 5341 Three Points Blvd4K)5- 5341 THREE POINTS BLVD #05-25 $40.00 COMMENT FORM Invoice 072605 7~26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-308 Building Inspection Fees 06-09-05 THRU 07-13-05 BLDG INSPECTIONS Invoice 072605 7126/2005 Transaction Date 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,806.48 $18,106.48 Refer 72605 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 8074567 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8074614 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8075030 7/26/2005 Transaction Date -$5.83 $380.23 $403,31 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $777.71 -2122- ....... ,~, IB~. , I, LB ,dill City of Mound 07/21/05 8:30 AM Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: July 2005 Refer 72605 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $50.00 Invoice 78357296 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 78357308 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo $187.20 10100 Total $237.20 Refer 72605 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE Invoice 3320535 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE invoice 3320197 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2216688 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609.49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2216687 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609.49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE invoice 3320823 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2218650 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2218649 7/26/2005 Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE invoice 2218648 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609.49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2218647 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -$13.40 -$13.33 $1,868.40 $493.85 *$13.10 $46.25 $113.45 $1,702.45 $1,443.05 $5,627.62 Rear 72605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Transaction Date PROTECTION ONE E 101-43100-4.40 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-05 THRU 10-15-05 ALARM MONITORING 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-05 THRU 10-15-05 ALARM MONITORING 7/26/2005 E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-16-05 THRU 10-15-05 ALARM MONITORING 7/26/2005 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.60 $47.60 $47.60 $142.80 Refer 72605 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E Invoice 574699-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 574325-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 574897-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 572247-00 Cash Payment E Invoice 577959-00 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 7/26/2005 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 7/26/2005 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 7/26/2005 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 7/26/2005 609.49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 7/26/2005 $92.00 $642.89 $374.22 $4,292.15 $675.77 -2123- CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 577212-00 7/26/2005 City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 18 Current Period: July 2005 ___:_:__:~:::~.~ - -- . ~ LIQUOR $558.76 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,635.79 Refer 72605 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 07-11-05 DEPOT REPAIRS $176.84 Invoice 658 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $176.84 Refer 72605 ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES, INCOR Cash Payment E 101-42400-433 Dues and Subscriptions LICENSES VERSION 1.1 $106.50 Invoice 2005106 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-433 Dues and Subscriptions LICENSES VERSION 1.1 $106.50 Invoice 2005106 7~26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions LICENSES VERSION 1.1 $106.50 InvOice 2005106 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-433 Dues and Subscriptions LICENSES VERSION 1.1 $106.50 invoice 2005106 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $426.00 Refer 72605 SCHARBER AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair V-BELTS Invoice 02 2049889 7/2612005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair CREDIT-BLADES Invoice 02 2049700 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo $336.75 -$42.33 10100 Total $294.42 Refer 72605 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal SCHERVEN PARK $745.50 Invoice 5431 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal HALSTED ROAD $798.75 Invoice 5430 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-533Tree Removal 4909 ISLANDVIEW DRIVE $905.25 Invoice 5432 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-533 Tree Removal 4855 ISLANDVIEW DRIVE $2,249.81 Invoice 5440 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal MONMOUNTH STORM DAMAGE $186.38 Invoice 5444 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,885.69 Refer 72605 SPECIALTY WINES AND BEVERAG Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $174.00 Invoice 3372 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $174.00 Refer 72605 STA-SAFE LOCKSMITHS COMPAN Cash Payment E 101-42110-220 Repair/Maint Supply INTERVIEW ROOM LOCK $105.03 Invoice 15111 7/26/2005 PO 19078 Transaction Date 7/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.03 Refer 72605 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts Invoice 8539 7/26/2005 RED STROBE LIGHTS $98.59 -2124- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 7/12/2005 City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 19 Current Period: July 2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9B~59 R,~f'~r 7~6nR '~HORPE D!STR!BUT!NG COMPAN Cash Payment Invoice 378374 Cash Payment Invoice 378373 Cash Payment Invoice 38206 Cash Payment Invoice 379027 Cash Payment Invoice 379028 Cash Payment Invoice 37746 Cash Payment Invoice 38320 Cash Payment Invoice 379858 Cash Payment Invoice 379859 Transaction Date E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale 7/26/2005 7/7/2005 BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER BEER WellsFa~o 10100 Total $13,163.05 $22.00 $354,.50 $137.25 $3,140.05 $591.00 $261.00 $100.55 $4,338.65 $22,108.05 Refer 72605 THRIFTY WHITE DRUG STORE Cash Payment Invoice 766181 Cash Payment Invoice 734879 Cash Payment Invoice 734882 Transaction Date E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/26/2005 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/26/2005 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/26/2005 7/18/2005 Refer 72605 TRUE VALUE, MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 7/26/2005 E 101-45200-220 RepaidMaint Supply 7/26/2005 E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 7/26/2005 E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies 7/2612005 E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 7/26/2005 E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies 7/26~2005 E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 7/26/2005 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 7/2612005 05-07-05 PHOTO PROCESSING 06-11-05 PHOTO PROCESSING 06-13-05 PHOTO PROCESSING Wells Fargo 10100 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Total $17.02 $25.52 $7.73 $50.27 $7.22 $145.47 $21.57 $16.63 $16.63 $16.63 $16.63 $24.81 $95.71 -2125- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 072605 City of Mound Payments 07/21/05 8:30 AM Page 20 Current Period: July 2005 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $12.99 7/26/2005 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment invoice 072605 Cash Payment invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Transaction Date E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $14-.67 7/26/2005 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $144..81 7/26/2005 E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $64.92 7/26/2005 E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $33.63 7/26/2005 E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $10.63 7/2612005 E 101-41910-220 Repalr/Maint Supply 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $148.37 7/26/2005 E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $33.85 7/26/2005 E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $216.25 7/26/2005 . E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials 06-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $29.80 7/26/2005 7/21/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,071.22 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment invoice 072605 Transaction Date E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 7/26/2005 E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 7/26/2005 E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 7/26/2005 E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 7126/2005 E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 7/26/2005 Rear 72605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 Cash Payment Invoice 072605 TransacUon Date 07-03-05 612-269-9058 BUSINARO,GINO 07-03-05 612-723-7560 MOUND FIRE 07-03-05 612-751-3572 ENGINE #18 07-03-05 612-751-3573 MOUND FIRE 07-03-05 612-240-5244 HANSON,KANDIS Total 7/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 VERIZON WIRELESS (P/W) E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 07-10-05 CELL PHONES 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 07-10-05 CELL PHONES 7/26/2005 E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Calls 07-10-05 CELL PHONES 7/26/2005 G 101-22816 Personal Cell Phone 07-10-05 CELL PHONES 7/26/2005 G 101-22816 Personal Cell Phone 07-10-05 CELL PHONES 7/26/2005 E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 07-10-05 CELL PHONES 7/2612005 7/20/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 72605 WlDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC $8.29 $0.55 $0.55 $0,55 $87.82 $97.76 $202.20 $130.12 $120.11 $205.95 -$26,32 $16.88 $648.94 -2126- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 1035 City of Mound Payments 07/21t05 8:30 AM Page Current Period: July 2005 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 05-31-50 FINCH LANE GATE VALVE $1,920.00 7/26/2005 Cash Payment Invoice 1036 Cash Payment Invoice 1037 Cash Payment Invoice 1039 Cash Payment Invoice 1040 Cash Payment invoice 1041 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/12/2005 Refer 72605 WILLIAMS TOWING Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program- invoice 072605 7/26/2005 PO 19090 Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 PO 19090 Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 PO 19090 Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program 072605 7/26/2005 PO 19090 Transaction Date 7/14/2005 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 06-01-05 EAGLE LANE GATE VALVE 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 06-02-05 DOVE/CANARY GATE VALVE 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 06-14-05 WOODLAND/CANARY CURB STOPS 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 06-14-05 WESTEDGE BREAK 7/26/2005 E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 06-13-05 WOODLAND/CANARY BREAK Wells Fargo 10100 #05-631 EXPLORER #05-1016 97 DODGE RAM PU #05-1024 03 CADILLAC ESCALADE #05-1385 99 TOYOTA CAMRY Total $1,920.00 $1,120.00 $800.00 $472.50 $778.75 $7,011.25 $178.92 $141.65 $141.65 $141.65 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $603.87 Refer 72605 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $115,50 Invoice 119915-00 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $831.20 Invoice 119917-00 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/19/2005 Rear 72605 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $946.70 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$30.32 Invoice 25003 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $364.00 Invoice 129366 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WiNE $372.00 Invoice 129387 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $705.68 Refer 72605 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 06-05#51-4802601-1 $5,070.69 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities 06-05 #51-6002832-6 $1,191.69 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities 06-08-05 THRU 07-07-05 SIREN #51-6002835-9 $21,82 Invoice 072605 7/26/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities #51-6002834-8 WATER TOWER $3,237.21 Invoice 072605 712612005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities #51-6002836-0 STREET LIGHTS $235.52 Invoice 072605 7~26~2005 -2127- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 072605 City of Mound Payments 07/21105 8:30 AM Page 22 Current Period: July 2005 E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 06-05 #51-4802601-1 SIGNAL LIGHTS $151.63 7/26/2005 Transaction Date 7/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,908.56 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 427 SEAL COAT FUND 455 TIF 1-2 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $92,924.38 $1,661.91 $3,431.96 $57,942.60 $519.00 $6,398.57 $24,121.36 $51,748.44 $90,136.15 $66.37 $102.00 $9,883.33 $338,936.07 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $338,936.07 $338,936.07 -2128- Executive Summary Hoisington Koeglcr Group Inc. TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: July 20, 2005 SUBJECT: PC Case #05-08/#05-23 Hovren Minor Subdivision/Variances The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their July 11th meeting where a motion for approval of the minor subdivision and variance was recommended. The Planning Commission expressed concern that the homes were being proposed to be built at the setback lines. To address this issue, the Planning Commission added a condition requiting a foundation survey. The Planning Commission also had a brief discussion about whether these are lakeshore lots based on the survey. Subsequent review by staff has determined that the lots are lakeshore based on the City Code definition of lakeshore lot which is "a lot abutting public waters or abutting public lands abutting public waters with the exception of designated parks." According to Hennepin County data, between the parcels and Avalon Channel (incorrectly labeled as Seton Channel on the survey) is Stratford Lane, a public tight-of-way. Both Staff and Planning Commission are recommending approval of the request. Members of the Council are advised that a resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the minor subdivision and variance has been prepared. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2129- RESOLUTION # 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 4552 AND 4568 DENBIGH ROAD P & Z CASE # 05-08 & 05-23 PID # 19-117-23-24-0048 & 19-117-23-24-0011 WHEREAS, the applicant, Todd Hovren, has submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create three buildable parcels from two existing lots of record; and, WHEREAS, the properties are located between Cardigan and Cardiff Lanes along Avalon Channel. The property includes lots 7, 8, 9, and 10, Block 2, Avalon. The properties as currently held, include approximately 11,700 square feet and 11,600 square feet respectively. The Zoning is R-lA, Single Family Residential; and, WHEREAS, according to Hennepin County data, each property is developed with a one-story residence constructed in 1920. Each property also includes a detached garage. The home on the 4552 property and the detached garages will be removed and replaced as part of this development; and, WHEREAS, the applicant proposes the following development standards for the parcels labeled as "A", "B", and "C" on the survey: Proposed Parcel A Lot Area 8,184 sq. ft. Lot Width (as platted measurement) 55 feet Lot Depth (as platted measurement) 150 feet Sideyards 10 feet Frontyard 20+ feet Rear/Lakeside (Lake Minnetonka) 50+ feet Hardcover (maximum) Not provided Required Variance 6,000 sq. ft. 40 feet 80 feet 10 feet 20 feet 50 feet 2,455 sq. ft. -2130- Parcel B Lot Area Lot Width (as platted measurement) Lot Depth (as platted measurement) Sideyards Frontyard ReadLakeside (Lake Minnetonka) Hardcover (maximum) Proposed Required Variance 8,250 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 55 feet 40 feet 150 feet 80 feet 10+ feet 10 feet 20+ feet 20 feet 50+ feet 50 feet Not provided 2,475 sq. ft. Parcel C Lot Area Lot Width (as platted measurement) Lot Depth (as platted measurement) Sideyards Frontyard Rear/Lakeside (Lake Minnetonka) Hardcover (maximum) Proposed Required Variance 7,402 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. - 49 feet 40 feet - 150 feet 80 feet - 3.8 feet 10 feet 6.2 33 feet 20 feet - 50+ feet 50 feet - 2,211 sq. ft. 2,220 sq. ft. - ; and, WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision meets all applicable zoning minimums for lot and bulk standards. The existing house on Parcel C has an existing nonconforming side yard setback of 3.8 feet for which the applicant is requesting a variance. The proposed home locations on Parcels A and B show conforming setbacks as non-lot of record property; and, WHEREAS, site topography slopes southeast to northwest with an elevation change of about 40 feet over the approximately 150 feet from Denbigh Road to Avalon Channel, resulting in the homes being proposed to be built on a bluff. Section 350.1225 of the Mound City Code requires a 10 foot setback from the top of bluff. The applicant therefore needs a variance to allow building within a bluff; and, WHEREAS, given the property elevations, the proposed residences' Iow floor elevations will meet or exceed the RFPE requirements of 933.0 feet; and, WHEREAS, the parcels will be required to meet the maximum of 30% impervious surface cover with the non-lot of record status; and, WHEREAS, the minor subdivision would create a new parcel, triggering park dedication fees of $1100 for the newly created lot (Section 330.120 Subd. 3); and, WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed the application and recommended approval of the minor subdivision with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and has recommended approval of the 6.2 side yard variance for Parcel C as requested by the applicant with the following findings of fact: 1. The nonconforming side yard setback of the home is a pre-existing condition -2131 - not created by the actions of the applicant. Allowing the residence to remain with the nonconforming side yard setback until the useful life of the building expires will not change the existing neighborhood character. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and has recommended approval of a variance allowing building within a bluff as requested by the applicant with the following finds of fact: 1. The neighborhood was platted prior to the enactment of a Shoreland Management Ordinance. 2. Grading of neighborhood for residential development altered the natural character of the bluff. 3. Similar circumstances exist for a large percentage of the homes along the north side of Denbigh Road that are also built on the bluff. 4. Granting the variance would not detriment the purposes of this Ordinance. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the minor subdivision, a 6.2 side yard setback variance, and a variance to allow building within a bluff as requested by the applicant with the following conditions: 1. The City does hereby approve the minor subdivision request with the following conditions: a. The lots have a non-lot of record status. Drainage and utility easements be provided along side lot lines 5 feet in width, rear lot lines 10 feet in width and front lot lines 10 feet in width. The drainage and utility easement on the southwest property line of Parcel C shall be to the maximum width possible but not encompass the home. c. The City Engineer review grading and drainage easements and plans prior to building permit approval. d. Retaining walls be provided if the slopes on the lots are greater than 3:1. eo Hardcover be limited to 30%. If pervious pavers are desired to meet this requirement, the installation shall be by a commercial contractor. As-built survey will be required to be submitted for all area(s) where pervious pavers product used to certify that the installation was done according to submitted specifications. As-built survey shall be required to be signed by professional engineer. f. Installation of utilities prior to the issuance of building permit or -2132- provide financial guarantee to cover the cost of utility service connections prior to the release of the Resolution for recording. g. Locations of water and sewer services to be approved by Mound Public Works department. h. Payment of sanitary sewer and watermain trunk charges of $1,500.00 each respectively for Parcel B. i. Payment of sanitary sewer and water connection fees of $240.00 each respectively for Parcel B. j. Plans be revised so driveways are at a minimum of 3% slope and maximum of 9% slope. k. Park dedication fee of $1,100.00 be paid prior to the release of the Resolution for recording. I. Payment of any City fees for review of the minor subdivision and variance applications. 2. The minor subdivision and variance is approved for the following legally described property included on Exhibit A as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted July 26, 2005 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: City Clerk -2133- Exhibit "A" Proposed Legal Descriptions: Parcel A: That part of Lot 7 and 8, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeast of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 7; thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of said Lots 7 and 8, a distance of 55.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 8 and there terminating. Parcel B: That part of Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 7 of Block 2; thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of said Lots 7, 8 and 9, a distance of 55.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence continuing along the last described course a distance of 55.00 feet; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 9; thence North 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds East along the Northwest line of said Lot 8 and 9, a distance of 55.00 feet to a point that bears North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Parcel C: That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwest of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 7 of said Block 2; thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of said Lots 7, 8 and 9 of said Block 2, a distance of 110.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 9 and there terminating. -2134- MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 11, 2005 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #05-08105-23 MINOR SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE 4552 AND 4568 DENBIGH ROAD - TODD HOVREN MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Schwingler, to recommend Council approve the minor subdivision and variance with staff conditions. Discussion Parcel C includes an area 25-35 feet from the OHW. It doesn't appear to be lakeshore. Miller reiterated the difficulty of building on these lots and the closeness of the setbacks. Friendly amendment accepted by Osmek and Schwingler to require foundation survey. MOTION approved unanimously. -2135- -2136- ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. 5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Mianetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax (952) 474 8267 suRvEY.oR: TODD HO VREN SURVEYED: June 3, 2006 DRAFTED: June 7, 2005 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL A: That part of Lots 7 and 8, Block 2, Avalon, Heunepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeast of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Lot 7; thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of said Lots 7 and 8, a distance of 55.00 feet to the point ofbeglnnlng of the line to be described; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 8 and there terminating. Contains 8,184 Sq. Ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL B: That part of Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast comer of Lot 7 of said Block 2; thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of said Lots 7, 8 and 9, a distance of 55.00 feet to the point ofbeglnning of the parcel to be described; thence continuing along the last described course a distance of 55.00 feet; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest hne of said Lot 9; thence North 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds East along the Northwest line of said Lot 8 and 9, a distance of 55.00 feet to a point that bears North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating. Contains 8,250 Sq. Ft. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL C: That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwest of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast comer of Lot 7 of said Block 2; thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of Lots 7, 8, and 9 of said Block 2, a distance of 110.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 9 and there terminating. Contains 7,402 Sq. Ft. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal descrip---~ion with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown 2. We show a proposed division of the property. Please review the proposal to see that it is what you intend and submit to those governmental agencies that have jurisdiction to obtain their approvals, if you can, before making any decisions regarding the property. 3. The hardenver shown on the survey is only what we could see that was not covered by snow. There is a good possibility that there is more hardcover under the mow. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "· "Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if "o" is filled in, then denotes found iron monument. Note: 1. Existing buildings on Proposed Parcels A and B are to be removed. 2. Existing utilities shown hereon are from City as-built maps and are not field located. 3. Property lies in a bluffzone and a variance would be necessary to build the proposed homes. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. _s H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235 2O HARD COVER TABULATIO~ EXISTING HARDCOVER i House Gravel Drive TOTAL EXISTING HARDCO' AREA OF LOT TO OHW % HARDCOVER ~ HARD COVER TABULATIO~ EXISTING HARDCOVER Retaining Walls Garages Gravel Drive TOTAL EXISTING HAt, CO: AREA OF LOT TO OHW % HARDCOVER HARD COVER TABULATIO} EXISTING HARDCOVER House Existing Deck Retaining Walls and Wood Stel~ Gravel Driveway TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOi AREA OF LOT TO OHW % HARDCOVER GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 -2137- YING & ENGINEERING CO. MN 55345 Phone (952) 4747964 Fax (952) 474 8267 HO VREN DRAFTED: June 7, 2005 CEL A: Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeast of aencing at the Southeast comer of said Lot 7; thence South West along the Southeast line of said Lots 7 and 8, a distance ing of the line to be described; thence North 22 degrees 18 :e of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 8 and there CEL B: Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: ,v of Lot 7 of said Block 2; thence South 69 degrees 49 Southeast line of said Lots 7, 8 and 9, a distance 0f55.00 parcel to be described; thence continuing along the last ) feet; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West ~west line of said Lot 9; thence North 69 degrees 49 Northwest line of said Lot 8 and 9, a distance of 55.00 feet to 18 minutes 03 seconds West fi.om the point ofbeglnning; ~ 03 seconds East a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of EEL C: · Avalon, Hemaepin Comaty, Minnesota, lying Southwest of ranting at the Southeast comer of Lot 7 of said Block 2; ; 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of Lots 7, 8, and 00 feet to the point of beginnlng of the line to be described; ; 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the ;re terminating. t of boundary lines of the above legal description. The ude determining what you own, which is a legal matter. 5th your records or consult with competent legal counsel, :orrect, and that any matters of record, such as easements, have been shown of the property. Please review the proposal to see that hose governmental agencies that have jurisdiction to before making any derisions regarding the property. ey is only what we could see that was not covered by snow. ; is more hardcover under the snow. ENTIONS: ,tic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, if "o" is ,nument. osed Parcels A and B are to be removed. xeon are from City as-built maps and are not field located. te and a variance would be necessary to build the proposed homes. 5cation, report or survey was prepared by me or t I am a licensed Professional Engineer and 's of the State of Minnesota. 2O HARD COVER TABULATION PARCEl., A: EXISTING HARDCOVER House 848 Sq. Ft~ Gravel Drive 707 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 1,555 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 8,184 Sq. Ft. % HARDCOVER 19% HARD COVER: TABULATION PARCEL B: EXISTING HARDCOVER Retaining Walls 70 Sq. Ft. Garages 884 Sq. Ft. Grovel Drive 502 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 1,456 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 8~250 Sq. Ft. % HARDCOVER 18% HARD COVER TABULATION PARCEL C: EXISTING HARDCOVER House 757 Sq. Ft. Existing Deck 200 Sq. Ft. Retaining Walks and Wood Steps 316 Sq. Ft. Gravel Driveway 938 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,211 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OI-IW 7,402 Sq. Ft. % HARDCOVER 30% LEG GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 -2138- /* -2139- ELEVATION SHEET # 1.1 -2140- BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN xx S.F.- DOES NOT INC3.UDE UNEXCAVA'i'ED AREAS SHEET # 2 MAIN FLOOR PLAN xX S.F'.- DO[S NOT INCI_u0£ UNEXCAVA3ED AREAS SHEET # -2141 - CUF..NT NAME: SCOTT BYRK~T -2142- UPPER FLOOR PLAN XX S.F.- D0~S NOT INC~ UN'EXCAVATED AR~A~ SHEET 4 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: 7/20/2005 Re: Planning Commission Appointment Summary At its July 11, 2005 meeting, members of the Planning Commission interviewed five (5) candidates for the Planning Commission to fill Gregg Raines position who submitted his resignation. Several members of the City Council also attended the interview session including Pat Meisel, John Beise and Mike Specht. While the City received seven (7) applications, one candidate was not able to attend the interview due to family illness and one candidate did not appear for the interview. Following review and discussion, the Planning Commission, by consensus, agreed to follow the PC Work Rules which states that in the event a candidate cannot attend an interview, the Planning Commission may consider the candidate based upon the submitted written materials. Details regarding the candidate interviews and selection process are contained in the July 11th Planning Commission meeting minutes (draft) which have been included in the agenda packet. Recommendation Based on its review, the Planning Commission recommends that Orv Burma be appointed to the Planning Commission for the duration of the vacant term which expires on December 31, 2005. -2143- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 117 2005 COMMISSION MEMBER INTERVIEWS John Politte called in with an absence. His application will be considered on its own merit. Michael Solheim is not here at 7:10 p.m. Orv Burma left the Planning Commission because he chose to work with the LMCD. He has no agenda. All things being equal he would lean towards following the code. If the Council reversed a Commission recommendation he might go to a Council meeting for clarification. Orv missed working with the Planning Commission and would try for a Commission position again if not chosen today. Given the opportunity, he would not attend a public hanging. Chris Carlson has lived in Mound for more than 10 years. He has businesses in Plymouth dealing with specialized mechanical systems, a 3 year old son and a wide range of life experiences. Mr. Carlson thought it would be interesting to be involved in the City Planning process. All things being equal he would lean towards following the code. If the Council reversed a Commission recommendation he would look for clarification from the Council. He has no agenda coming in. He has never been before a Planning Commission for a land use application. He would absolutely apply again if not chosen today. Given the opportunity, he wouldn't go out of his way to go to or avoid a public hanging. Ron Emmons has lived in Mound off and on since 1965. He's in the lumber business, married with grown children. His main reason for applying is to keep an eye on quality of building and codes in Mound. He's interested in the development of Mound and has no axe to grind. All things being equal he would lean his decisions toward the property owner. If the Council reversed a Commission recommendation he would ask to present his view to the Council. He has been before a Planning Commission several years ago for a property swap. He would apply again if not chosen today. Given the opportunity he would not attend a public hanging. Cheryl Martin has been a Mound resident since 1999. She is the owner of home-based business and has been interested in City Council matters for quite a while. Her goal is to run for City Council. She would like to see a healthy atmosphere in Mound. She's concerned that there is no place for kids to "hang" and would like to see a community center in place. All things being equal she would have to look at the background of a request before giving a decision. If the Council reversed a Commission recommendation she didn't know what, if anything, she would do. She would apply again if not chosen today and thought a public hanging might be interesting. -2144- Planning Commission Minutes July 11, 2005 Michael Paulsen is a life resident of Mound. He is currently a graduate student in Planning. He feels Mound should work with what we have, focusing on mixed use, retail/residential. All things being equal he would lean towards following the code. If the Council reversed a Commission recommendation he might ask for clarification. He's had experience creating a land use plan and zoning map for the City of Clairmont. His current education process stresses minimizing shadow, lighting, and parking impacts. He definitely would apply again if not chosen today and didn't thing he would attend a public hanging. Michael Solheim - Is not here at 8:00 p.m. Ballots were completed and are attached as part of this record. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Schwingler, to recommend Council appoint Orv Burma to the Planning Commission. MOTION approved unanimously. 2 -2145- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 05- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) GRANT FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY AND APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the submittal of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Grant Application to Hennepin County in February 2005 to construct a parking deck and support facilities in the Transit District; and WHEREAS, an official copy of the 2005 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) application is on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound was awarded a $1M TOD grant by Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the proposed parking deck will include (50) spaces designated for Park and Ride use and will also include a transit shelter and permanent space for a farmer's market as well as street lighting, sidewalks and other pedestrian amenities; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has prepared a Cooperative Agreement and has requested execution by the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, hereby accepts the Transit Oriented Grant and approves the Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Mound. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of July 2005 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2146- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 05- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A CONTAMINATION CLEANUP GRANT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVING PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT PROJECT NO. CCGP-05-0012-Z-FY05 WHEREAS, the City Council authorized the submittal of a Contamination Cleanup Grant Application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) in April 2005 requesting funding for the Lost Lake and Maxwell property soil remediation project; and WHEREAS, an official copy of the 2005 Contamination Cleanup Application is on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound was awarded a $1,476,985 grant for the project; and WHEREAS, DEED has prepared a Program Grant Agreement for Project No. CCGP- 05-0012-Z-FY05 and has requested execution by the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, hereby accepts the Contamination Cleanup Grant from the Department of Employment and Economic Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk and Mayor are hereby authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City of Mound. Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of July 2005 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2147- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2005 An Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 375.10, Subd. 4 (Grading and Erosion Control Plan) The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 375.10, Subd. 4 (C) (Grading and Erosion Control Plan) of the Mound City Council is hereby amended to read as follows: City Code Chapter 375.10, Subd. 4 (C) Every effort shall be made to minimize disturbance of existing ground cover. No grading or filling shall be permitted within forty (40) feet of the ordinary high water mark of a water body unless specifically approved by the City. To minimize the erosion potential of exposed areas, restoration of ground cover shall be provided within five (5) days after completion of the grading operation. All .qradin.q must be completed in a manner to avoid a public nuisance as defined in City Code Chapter 1000.15A (Public Nuisances Affectinq Peace and Safety.) Construction and grading that has become a public nuisance is subject to abatement as contained in City Code Chapter 1000.25 (Abatement.) Passed by the City Council this __ day of .,2005. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel Published in The Laker the Effective the ~ day of __day of .,2005 ,2005. -2148- CITY OF MOUND MEMO 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com DATE: TO: FROM: RE: July 21, 2005 Mayor Meisel Council Members City Manager Kandis Hanson Reaching City of Mound Goals At the Council and Staff Goal Setting retreat, held June 21, 2005, priorities for the needs at the City of Mound were established. As indicated in the 2005 Strategic Planning Report by Ehlers and Associates, the next step is allotting the resources to carry out the goals. It is Management's recommendation that the top five goals become the focus over the next 1-2 years, and that the resources of time, money and information be dedicated to them. Staff is recommending Council Member approval to move forward with the assessment stage of these first five priorities. 1. City Code At the Goal Setting Retreat, re-codification of the City Code was deemed the top priority. Codification would include reorganization and update of the existing City Code and would most likely be undertaken by a consultant retained by the City who specializes in this type of work. Typically the process can take up to and may exceed a year, depending on the status of the existing ordinances. Preliminary estimates for the project is $8,000 to $12,000 and could possibly be budgeted over a 2-year period. Public Works and Parks Building At the Goal Setting Retreat the Public Works & Parks building was ranked as the #2 priority. The existing buildings do not provide for adequate storage, repair facilities, salt storage and personnel needs for the City. The buildings do not meet the OSHA standards or building codes. The Public Works building was last updated in 1988 and parts of the building are 50 and 60 years old. The Park building on the Island is 68 years old. 1 The first phase of the process is to update the Needs Assessment Study. The City would select an architect with a background in Parks & Public Work facilities who would then study the City's needs and report on what improvements and construction is recommended to meet current and future needs. It is anticipated the study would be completed in 4-6 months. After the needs study is completed the City Council would review the assessment and determine if they wish to proceed with a public process with the focus being on public acceptance of a new building and its location. The public process could take 6 months depending on the response of the public and the complexity of the project. Should the project receive a favorable response from the public, a project could be bid for construction to begin in 2007. Rental Property Code The addition of a Rental Property Code was the third priority at the Goal Setting Retreat. Due to increase demand for inspections by Police, Fire and Building inspections associated with rental units from tenants and/or landlords, the need for a rental ordinance is becoming increasingly important especially with regard to costs currently incurred by the City. These costs are not being recouped for complaint related and public safety issues. Additionally, it is important to note that the City has a significant amount of rental housing stock some of which is not being maintained and we are seeing more units being converted to "rental" for investment purposes. City of Mound building officials, Waldron and Associates, is well-experienced in this type of code enforcement and is meeting with staff on July 22 to discuss their proposal for a policy. Council members will consider the policy at an upcoming meeting. Next-Up Redevelopment The planning and implementation stages of the Mound Harbor Renaissance Redevelopment are virtually behind staff. The next step is the planning for the next redevelopment locations, which was the fourth priority at the Goal Setting Retreat. The preparation of a master plan in cooperation with Westonka Schools for the Shirley Hills and Grandview Middle School sites may be needed in light of a possible referendum to undertake a "new" campus style plan at the school site which would turn these two parcels into possible redevelopment sites. Preliminary estimate for the project is $15,000 for the master plan and $30,000 to $40,000 if a public process is included in the process. 2 -2150- 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update The #5 priority at the Goal Setting Retreat was the 2008 comprehensive plan update. Pursuant to state statute, the City will need to update its comprehensive plan by 2008. The last update of the plan was in 1999-2000. It is estimated that the project will take 6-12 months and will cost approximately $35,000 if done by a consultant but less if specific parts are prepared by Staff. If future possible redevelopment sites (i.e., Balboa and/or Shoreline Plaza site) are included in the 2008 update, an additional $20,000 would be needed. The comprehensive plan could be budgeted over a 2-year period. 3 -2151 - 0 -2152- -2153- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: July 21, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance Request - Fence OWNER / APPLICANT: Steven Lievers PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 05-41 LOCATION: 5115 Bartlett Boulevard ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY At its July 11th meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a variance request from Steven Lievers to allow construction of a six (6) foot wood fence along the property line abutting Bartlett Boulevard. Pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:475, front yard fences are permitted to be placed along property lines within the front setback area as long as they do not exceed four (4) feet in height. The purpose for the fence is for privacy and to enclose the yard to safe guard the family pet(s). The requested variance is described below: Proposed Required Variance Front yard fence (6) feet (4) feet (2) feet PLANNING COMMISSION OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The applicant was not present at the meeting. However, the Planning Commission opted to formally review the variance after a motion to table the application failed due to lack of second. The Planning Commission voted 5 in favor and 2 opposed to recommend Council denial of the application based on Staff recommendation and the following findings: There appears to be no hardship demonstrated for the increased fence height as there are numerous lots in the community which are bordered by public streets on (2) sides including County Roads. -2154- Allowing a six (6) foot fence within the required front setback may be precedent setting. The installation of a four (4) foot fence within the front setback area is permissible by City Code. A six (6) foot fence can be installed on the property immediately behind the 30-foot front setback line. There are alternate means to screen and enclose the area including, but not limited to, landscaping (ie. evergreen trees and/or arborvitae, etc.) and installation of a 4-foot fence within the 30-foot front setback area and construction of a 6-foot fence immediately beyond the 30-foot setback line. A resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been prepared. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Staff spoke with the applicant following the meeting who indicated that he was unaware he needed to be present at the PC meeting. It is anticipated he will be present at the Council meeting to discuss his application. The application was deemed to be complete on or around May 25, 2005 and the City's deadline for action is on or around July 23rd. As allowed by M.S.S. 15.99, Staff executed a 60-day extension regarding the City's action on the variance request on July 19, 2005. -2155- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 11~ 2005 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #05-4'1 VARIANCE - FENCE 5115 BARTLETT BLVD - STEVEN LIEVERS Applicant is not present. No one is present to speak to the case. MOTION by $chwingler, seconded by Miller, to recommend Council deny based on staff recommendation. MOTION by Mueller, to table the application. Motion died for lack of second. Osmek called the question. MOTION approved. In favor: Miller, Ayaz, Hasse, Osmek, Michael Schwingler. Against: Glister and Mueller. -2156- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 05- A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR A SIX (6) FOOT FRONT YARD FENCE AT 5115 BARTLETT BOULEVARD MOUND, MINNESOTA PID# 24-117-24-12-0011 PLANNING AND ZONING CASE NO. 05-41 WHEREAS, the applicant, Steven Lievers, has submitted a request for a two (2) foot height variance to allow installation of a six (6) foot front yard fence to be constructed within the 30-foot front setback along Bartlett Boulevard; WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 5115 Bartlett Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the purpose for the fence is to provide privacy and protect the family pet(s); and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350:475 regulates fence height to no more than four (4) feet when located in the front yard as measured from existing grade; and WHEREAS, Staff could not support the variance request as there are other feasible alternatives available including moving the fence further south and installation of trees and~or landscaping which will accomplish the intended result; and WHEREAS, at its July 11, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the request and recommended that the City Council deny the variance as requested by the applicant. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby deny the variance as recommended by the Planning Commission based on the following findings of facts outlined below: -2157- There appears to be no hardship demonstrated for the increased fence height as there are numerous lots in the community which are bordered by public streets on (2) sides including County Roads. B. Allowing a six (6) foot fence within the required front setback may be precedent setting. C. The installation of a four (4) foot fence within the front setback area is permissible by City Code. D. A six (6) foot fence can be installed on the property immediately behind the 30-foot fi:ont setback line. There are alternate means to screen and enclose the area including, but not limited to, landscaping and (ie. evergreen trees and/or arborvitae, etc.) and installation of a 4-foot fence within the 30-foot front setback area and construction of a 6-foot fence immediately beyond the 30-foot setback line. 2. The variance is denied for the following legally described property: Lot 4, Rearrangement Shirley Hills Unit B, Block 7 The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted July 26, 2005 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2158- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: July 6, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance Request OWNER / APPLICANT: Steven Lievers PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 05-41 LOCATION: 5115 Bartlett Boulevard ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY The applicant, Steven Lievers, has submitted a variance request to allow construction of a six (6) foot wood fence along the property line abutting Bartlett Boulevard. Pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:475, front yard fences are permitted to be placed along property lines within the front setback area as long as they do not exceed four (4) feet in height. The purpose for the fence is for privacy and to enclose the yard to safe guard the family pet(s). The requested variance is described below: Proposed Required Variance Front yard fence (6) feet (4) feet (2) feet 60-DAY PROCESS The application was received and deemed to be complete on or around May 25, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around July 6, 2005 to inform them of the variance request. No comments have been received as of this writing. -2159- CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. At its June 6th meeting, the Planning Commission deemed the existing survey from Coffin and Gronberg dated 5-7-92 acceptable for the purposes of land use application review. 2. The subject property, which includes a single-family house, fronts Bartlett Boulevard / CSAH 125 on the north side and Channel Road on the south side. 3. The property is accessed from Channel Road. 4. The proposed fence material (wood) is consistent with the code regulations. 5. There is approximately 17 feet from the south curb line of Bartlett Boulevard to the property line. 6. The fence is proposed to be installed along a portion of the front setback area abutting Bartlett Blvd. 7. The application was forwarded to Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County who indicated that they he has no comments regarding the request. 8. The installation of a six (6) foot fence within the front yard setback may be precedent setting as there are many lots in the City of Mound that are bordered by City streets and/or County Roads and/or are located on corner or through lots. 9. Resolution No. 92-72 was adopted on June 23, 1992 to approve a front yard setback variance to allow construction of a garage addition (copy attached.) 10. The topography slopes downward (north) from the house to the street. 11. The house is accessed from Channel Road therefore the "north" yard area which faces Bartlett Boulevard basically functions as a backyard. 12. The property corners have been field staked. -2160- 13. There are a number of existing trees located on or around the north property line. 14. There are no fences facing Bartlett Boulevard on the abutting properties. RECOMMENDATION Staff does not support the variance and recommends denial due to the following findings of fact: There appears to be no hardship demonstrated for the increased fence height as there are numerous lots in the community which are bordered by public streets on (2) sides including County Roads. Allowing a six (6) foot fence within the required front setback may be precedent setting. The installation of a four (4) foot fence within the front setback area is permissible by City Code. A six (6) foot fence can be installed on the property immediately behind the 30-foot front setback line. There are alternate means to screen and enclose the area including, but not limited to, landscaping and (ie. evergreen trees and/or arborvitae, etc.) and installation of a 4-foot fence within the 30-foot front setback area and construction of a 6-foot fence immediately beyond the 30-foot setback line. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW .Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at its July 26, 2005 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at its July 11,2005 meeting. -2161 - crI"Y OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE AppLICATION Application Fee and Escrow, Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. (~'-~ City Council Date Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address LEGAL Lot Block DESC. Subdivision PID ~ Plat ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 PROPERTY Name OWNER Address ~ [~ Phone Hom~ ~ ~ Work Fax APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER Address THAN OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever~l:)een made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (/~ No (). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of r~solJ, l~ons. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Infomation (~ 012812004) ~a~e 4 of 0 -2162- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply w, itJ~ all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (~ No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: ( N S E W ) Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) Lakeside: ( N S E W ) : (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) ft. ft. ft. ff. ft. ff. ff. ft. ff. ff. ft. ff. ff. ff. ff. ft. ff. ff. ff. ff. ff. sq ft sq ft sq ff sq ff .sq ff sq ft 4. Does the prese~n~,use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ~), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: ) 'topography ( ) soil drainage ( ) shape ( ) other: specify ( ) existing situation Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 5 of 6 -2163- Case No. ~'* ~'/ 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of a.,ny~ne having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No/j)~. If yes, explain: 7. Was the hard,,s,bip created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No (/~). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions ,of~ardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in which are this petition? Yes ~)(~, No (). If no, list some other properties . similarly affected'~ 9. Comments:'.-~-._ ,~_~/3C~LtU{ ~.~\,~ '-~x',d'~ ~J~'E,u'3C..~,.. ~t~ I ce~i~ that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papem or plans to be submiffed herewith am true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the ent~ in or upon the promises described in this application by any authorized official of the Ci~ of Mound for the purpose of inspe~ing, or of posting, maintaining and removing such noti~s as may be required by law. Owner's Signature. _~,/"~j ~~ Applicant's Signatur~~ Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 6 of 6 -2164- HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFAGE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: OWNER'S NAME'. .LOT AREA ~ ;~'~,{~ \"~ LOT AREA \ ;~i'""] ~,-'~ so. ~: x,0%: <,o, ~,,,o,,) ....................................... SQ. FT. X 40%: (for Lots of Record) * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd, 6.B,1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ DETACHED BUILDINGS _~_b ,S X ¢2~O, ~ : (GARAGE/SHED) ~., ~ X ~ O,3 = / DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS ETC. TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.:..., ........ ; ................ DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are riot counted as hardCOver. TOyAL DRIVEWAY, ETC x X = X = TOTALDECK ....................................................... TOTAL OTHER ..................................... :: ............. TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .....~.~, ......................................................... 'PREPARED BY ~"' _~ Revised 08/06/03 DATE -2165- Page 1 of 2 350.475 Fences. Fencing shall be permitted in all zones subject to the following: Subd. 1. General Requirements - Fences. A. No person, firm or corporation shall erect, construct or place any fence without first making an application for and securing a building permit. B. The building official may require fence permit applicants to establish property boundary lines by a survey completed by a registered land surveyor. In all cases, the City of Mound shall not be liable for the establishment or definition of property lines. C. Chain link fences not exceeding ten (10) feet in height shall be permitted to enclose tennis courts. Subd. 2. Construction and Maintenance - Fences. A. All fences shall be constructed of durable, weather resistant materials and properly anchored. Every fence shall be maintained in a condition of reasonable repair and shall not be allowed to become and remain in a condition of disrepair, danger or constitute a nuisance. Fences in a state of disrepair or deemed to be a nuisance may be abated by the City by proceedings taken under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and the cost of abatement, including administration expenses, may be levied as a special assessment against the property upon which the fence is located. B. Electric fences and barbed wire fences are prohibited except that barbed wire may be used in industrial districts as an anti-vaulting measure on top of a fence that equals 6 feet in height. In such cases, barbed wired shall not exceed the height of 1 foot above the top of the fence. C. In all districts, fences shall be either chain link or wood, constructed from commercially available materials. Wooden fences shall not be constructed from twigs, branches, doors, siding or other wooden products originally intended for other purposes. D. Fences shall in no way detain or inhibit the flow of surface water drainage to and from abutting properties. E. Front yard fences shall be designed and constructed in such a manner so as not to unreasonably obscure the sight distance of vehicles accessing the street from driveways on the subject property or from adjacent properties. http ://www. cityo fmound.com/CITY%20CODI: 7 _2_l_6_6..-NE.html 7/7/2005 Page 2 of 2 F. Fence heights shall be measured from the adjoining natural ground. Fences installed on top of retaining walls shall be limited to a maximum of forty-two (42) inches in residential zones. G. All fenced areas shall be accessible through at least one gate having a minimum width of three (3) feet. H. All chain link fences shall have a top rail, barbed ends shall be placed at the bottom of the fence and posts shall be spaced at intervals not to exceed eight (8) feet. For wooden fences, post spacing shall not exceed eight (8) feet. I. Fences shall be installed such that the finished side faces abutting properties. The finished side shall be the side that provides maximum coverage of posts and stringers. Board- on-board, basket-weave fences, and similar design shall be deemed to have two finished sides. Subd. 3. Residential District Fences. A. Front yard fences may be solid or open and shall not exceed four (4) feet in height. B. Rear and side yard fences located behind the front yard setback line may be solid or open and shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. C. Fences shall be required around swimming pools in conformance with Subsection 350.645, Subd. 3. Subd. 4. Business and Industrial District Fences. A. Fences in Industrial Districts shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. B. Fences in Business Districts shall be by Conditional Use Permit and shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. Subd. 5. Shoreland District Lakeshore Setback Fences. Fences to be located within any portion of the fifty (50) foot principal structure lakeshore setback shall not exceed a maximum of three (3) feet in height and shall maintain a see-through visibility level equal to that of a chain-link type fence. All fence materials must be treated so as to blend with the natural surroundings of the setback area. http ://www.cityo fmound.com/CITY%20COD[, 2167_- XlE.html 7/7/2005 , 4 feet in hei~ f~etin hei ;Iround level withinti im: ;feet above' ground level within -2168-' 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Memorandum To: From: Date: Re: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director May 24, 2005 Review of Survey for 5115 Bartlett Boulevard Agenda Item. As the Planning Commission may be aware, City policy requires the submittal of an updated survey including all necessary information, including proposed improvements, as part of its land use application requirements. However, at its October 21, 2002 meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the City's survey requirements and expressed willingness to review individual requests by property owners on a case-by-case basis to consider relaxing some of the requirements and/or waiving the need for an updated survey in the event a land use application is requested. The owners of the property located at 5115 Bartlett Boulevard have made a verbal request to the Planning Commission to use the survey for the property currently on file at City Hall for a proposed variance application for a new fence. -2169- June 23, 1992 RESOLUTION #92-76 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION AT LOT 4t REARRANGEMENT OF BLOCK 7t SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT Bt (5115 BARTLETT BLVD.) PID ~24-117-24 12 0011 P&Z CASE NUMBER 92-028 WHEREAS, the applicant, Diane Rosencrantz, has applied for a 9 foot front yard setback variance to allow construction of a garage addition onto an existing nonconforming structure; and WHEREAS, the corner of the existing attached garage is setback approximately 26 feet from the front property line to Channel Road; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard setback to both Bartlett Blvd. and Channel Road, and 10 foot side yard setbacks. and; WHEREAS, all other setbacks and lot area are conforming, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested variance and unanimously recommended approval as recommended by staff. The Planning Commission incorporated the following finding of fact in its motion: "The Planning Commission finds that the requested variance is in conformance with Section 23.506.1 of the Mound Code of Ordinances and that the variance results from the shape of the lot and the abutting rights-of-way over which the applicant had no control." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City does hereby approve a 9 foot front yard.setback variance to allow construction of a ga'rage addition at 5115 Bartlett Blvd. The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) of the Zoning Code with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. 126 -2170- 127 June 23, 1992 It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land: Construction of a 8' x 20' garage addition. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lot 4, Rearrangement of Block 7, Shirley Hills Unit B PID ~24-117-24 12 0011. ' Se This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Smith and seconded by Mayor Johnson. The following voted in the affirmative: Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following voted in the negative: none. Att'est: - City Cler~ - ss/skip Johnson Mayor 127 -2171 - -2172-' Certificate of survey for Diane Rosenkranz ~-~-~'~ of Lot 4, Rearrangement of Block 7, Shirley Hills Unit B Hennepin County, Minnesota LJ9al Des~r!ption Lot 4, Rearrangement of Block 7, Shirley Hills Unit B. This survey shows the location of an existing house in relation to the boundaries of the above described prop- erty. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. -, o : Iron marker 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: July 21, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance(s) - deck / porch replacement and solarium OWNER: Becky Anderson CASE NUMBER: 05-40 LOCATION: 3106 Priest Road ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND At its June 20th and July 11th meetings, the Planning Commission reviewed an application from Becky Anderson requesting variance(s) approval to replace an existing deck / porch on the lakeside of her home located at 3106 Priest Lane. The proposed project, would also include a solarium to be constructed in a portion of the upper deck. The requested variance(s) are described as follows: Lakeside setback Front / corner setback* Required Existing / Requested Variance 50 feet 16 feet / 16 feet 34 feet 20 feet 19.4 feet / 19.4 feet 0.6 feet *The standard front setback is 30 feet in the R-1 District. However, the City Code allows a "corner" setback of 20 feet for "lots of record" with lot width between 51-81 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION June 20th. The Planning Commission tabled the application at its June 20th meeting so as to allow the applicant's representative the opportunity to visit with the owner regarding possible modifications to the proposal including the removal of the solarium. Additionally, the City Attorney was requested to comment on the "legitimizing" of the variance as referenced in the previously approved resolution(s) involving the structure. July 11th, A presentation on the application by Hugh Bishop, a legal representative of the applicant was made to the Planning Commission. The applicant's general contractor, Don Toaves, also discussed the proposed project. Discussion by the Planning Commission focused on the site conditions and hardships on the property to -2174- allow the expansion of the nonconforming structure if a solarium was included on the property. Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted (6) in favor and (1) opposed to recommend denial of the variance(s) application based on the following finding including: Practical difficulty is not applicable to a solarium. The application sets a precedent. The possible expansion and/or conversion of the deck to a structure. Due to differing recommendations from Staff and the Planning Commission, a resolution has not been prepared in advance of the City Council and would likely be brought back for action at an upcoming meeting. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The application was deemed to be complete on or around May 25, 2005 and the City's deadline for action is on or around July 23rd. As allowed by M.S.S. 15.99, Staff executed a 60-day extension regarding the City's action on the variance request on July 19, 2005. -2175- ,MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY '11 2005 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #05-40 VARIANCE (continued from June 20~) 3106 PRIEST LANE - BECKY ANDERSON CCD Smith introduced several elements of the project that supported approval of the project. It was determined that nothing has changed other than input from neighbors. Don Toaves, contractor, described the impact of the project on the neighbor across the street. After conversations with the applicant he related her need for a suitable work area in the home with 3 older children. Michael asked how this hardship would differ from someone else with the same request. Toaves indicated that, because of the position off the house, it is not typical of other properties. Osmek reaffirmed that the project would not go beyond the existing structure. Hasse asked how far the roof would hangover. Toaves indicate it would be I foot more. Hasse felt this indicated that it did go beyond the existing structure. Ayaz asked what the core of the hardship was? Legal Council Hugh Bishop, Reed and Pond Ltd, said that Becky wants to stay in the house but it's too small. It's a good project and an improvement to the neighborhood. She has the support of the neighbors. He pointed out Section 350.530, that establishes "undue hardship or practical difficulties" as a reason for granting the variance. Mueller felt there needs to be rules based on the same situation that everyone else has to deal with. Would there ever be a scenario that the city shouldn't do it. Bishop said if the project didn't make sense. Mueller felt it was an expansion that isn't allowed by the code. MOTION by Miller, seconded by Hasse, to recommend Council deny the variance request. Discussion Osmek said this was a change of use not expansion because footings exist. Miller said that if this was approved, he would be in line next meeting to get a variance for his property. -2176- Planning Commission Minutes July 11, 2005 Mueller felt that the practical difficulty that applies to a deck on a lakeshore property does not extend to solariums. MOTION approved. Voting for: Miller, Ayaz, Hasse, Michael, Glister, Schwingler, Mueller. Voting against: Osmek. Findin.qs Practical difficulty not applicable to a solarium; sets a precedent; a deck becomes a porch ........ 2 -2177- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 207 2005 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #05-40 VARIANCE LAKESIDE DECK REPLACEMENT 3106 PRIEST LANE - APPLICANT: BECKY ANDERSON MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Cklair, to recommend approval of the variance with staff recommendations. Osmek commented that they are building in the same locations and setbacks were recognized previously. They are replacing the structure in its current location. Lower area is a screened porch currently. Variance was recognized in 1995. Two of the footings have frost heaved. They're building in the same envelope as previously approved. Don Toaves, contractor, commented that they could move the addition in along Ridgewood Road. Miller, echoed by Mueller, commented that conversion of upper floor deck to solarium concerns him. Smith commented that opportunity to move the deck about (6) inches from Ridgewood Road would eliminate the variance. However, Mueller commented that it pushes the structure likely closer to the OHWM. Miller asked if the owner would consider eliminating the solarium. Toaves said that the owner commented that they have considered an option to resurface the deck. Mueller commented on the "legitimizing" of the variance conditions and commented that the City Attorney may need to comment. Smith commented that variance is needed because the deck/porch/solarium is changing. MOTION denied. Voting for: Osmek. Voting against: Miller, Hasse, Mueller, Glister and Schwingler. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Hasse, to recommend denial due to expansion / conversion of deck to a "roofed" structure as it wasn't enclosed previously. -2178- Planning Commission Minutes June 20,2005 Schwingler commented that we are moving denial towards the enclosed portion of the deck. Miller commented about the "expansion vs. expansion" concept. Smith commented that "structural" alterations are not allowed for nonconforming structures. Toaves asked if solarium was removed, would variance be supported. The Commission indicated that a lower floor screen porch / upper floor deck would be well received. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Miller, to table consideration of the variance until the July 11, 2005 Commission meeting. Miller requested legal opinion on structural alterations. 2 -2179- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT ADDENDUM TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: July 7, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance(s) - deck / porch replacement and solarium OWNER: Becky Anderson CASE NUMBER: 05-40 LOCATION: 3106 Priest Road ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND At its June 20th meeting, the Planning Commission review an application from Becky requesting variance(s) approval to replace an existing deck / porch on the lakeside of her home located at 3106 Priest Lane. follows: Required Lakeside setback 50 feet Front / corner setback* 20 feet The requested variance(s) are described as Existing / Requested Variance 16 feet / 16 feet 34 feet 19.4 feet / 19.4 feet 0.6 feet *The standard front setback is 30 feet in the R-1 District. However, the City Code allows a "corner" setback of 20 feet for "lots of record" with lot width between 51-81 feet. The Planning Commission tabled the application so as to allow the applicant's representative the opportunity to visit with the owner regarding possible modifications to the proposal including the removal of the solarium. Additionally, the City Attorney was requested to comment on the "legitimizing" of the variance as approved in the approved resolution(s) involving the structure. DISCUSSION Staff spoke with City Attorney John Dean regarding the current application and the applicability of Resolutions No. 88-108 and 95-15. It is his opinion that the resolutions have, in essence, recognized that the deck / screen porch as a legal non-conforming use. As the project includes the addition of a proposed solarium, the Planning Commission could reasonably conclude that variance approval is required because the new structures are sufficiently different from what was permitted by the referenced resolutions to be considered as an expansion even though the new structures do not further encroach into the required setback. -2180- It is Staff's understanding that the owner is not interested in modifying the proposal. A letter from the applicant's legal representative and photo(s) have been provided to explain the need for the proposed improvements. Additionally, letters of support from neighboring property owner(s) for the project have also been provided. 4. Details regarding the application are included in Planning Report No. 05-40 which was included in the June 20th agenda. Commission members are reminded to bring their 6/20 agenda to the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council to allow replacement of the existing deck/porch and construction of new solarium at 3106 Priest Road subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its June 20, 2005 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for review at its July 26, 2005 meeting. -2181 - MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISION Date: July 7, 2005 From: Hugh Bishop, Esq. Reed & Pond Ltd. Telephone: 612.590.9000 Re: Request of Becky Anderson for variance approval, 3106 Priest Road Becky Anderson has requested variance approval in order to extend upward, her existing porch on the back of her home, and to create a solarium where she plans to conduct her work as a writer. Because she was out of town, she was not able to be present when her request came to the initial Commission meeting. Her contractor answered questions, and the Commission moved to table consideration until July 11. Unfortunately Ms. Anderson will again be out of town on July 11, so she has asked me as her attorney to help present some of the points that may be helpful to the Commission in granting her approval. 1. This is a particularly important matter to Ms. Anderson. Her husband died under tragic circumstances some time ago. Ms. Anderson has recently devoted herself to furthering suicide awareness and prevention in Minnesota, and is presently the coordinator for a fundraising event for this cause. She is and is becoming a writer. As a recent widow with children, it is important to her to keep living in the same home. It has roots for her family. But her vision is that she will peacefully and productively be moving her work to the new solarium, which she is spending considerable attention designing so that it will be supportive of the quiet, contemplative work that she sees herself doing in the future. She sees herself practically living in the solarium during the daytime working hours. There is no other place in her home that supports the mental environ- ment that she wants to create to support her in her work. Therefore this is not a question that rests lightly for Ms. Anderson; she is highly, highly hopeful that this will work out. She is almost building her life around doing this project and being able to work in the new solarium room. 2. The OHWM buffer ordinance is new enough, that fairness requires it be flexible. Ms. Anderson's property was platted long ago. When the ordinance was adopted for setbacks from the ordinary high water mark, the OHWM buffer extended through the major portion of her lot. Thus as the property owner she found herself with a new City Code provision that effectively barred her from doing almost anything with her home. Except for the ability to request a variance. And variances have been granted or recognized for her property. As they have, perhaps even liberally, throughout the rest of the neighborhood. The use of the variance procedure is the only way that very unfair results would occur for many property owners in the same situation following the OHWM buffer setback ordinance. In this case, in order to be fair to the property owner, flexibility is required once again. 1 -2182- $. The use is intensified slightly, but the setback variances are not being increased at all. The context of this conversation is the desire of the City for a reasonable comprehensive plan, applied in an effective, responsible manner, with reasonable setback requirements included in it. For Mrs. Anderson's current use as a single family home with a porch on the back, the City has determined it is reasonable. In other words, the City has given permission for the porch to be there, even though it encroaches into the OHWM buffer zone. (Indeed, if the City did not allow these kinds of reasonable variances for existing property owners, then as discussed above any major new setback ordinance would create many unfair situations for many property owners.) The question now is whether intensifying the porch use is a reasonable request regarding these same setback requirements ... or is it perhaps instead flouting the recent setback ordinances. It is in no way flouting the requirements. It is an entirely reasonable request. And here is why: Adding the solarium will not increase any setback violations. At all. Thus in the context of a conversation about reasonable variations and variances from setback requirements, there is nothing that can be more basically reasonable than what Mrs. Anderson is proposing: "Give me permission to improve my property, and I will do it in a way that does not increase any violations of setback requirements at all." The City gets something from the arrangement: Improved appearance of the neighborhood, upgraded housing stock, and (perhaps) a slight increase in the tax base. The more important benefit to the City is a happy, well kept neighborhood. What Mrs. Anderson gets is a solarium where she can work during the day in her career. But her solarium will be no worse a violation of the setback ordinances than she already has. 4. This is a good improvement. It will not only benefit Mrs. Anderson in her particular family situation, it will improve the City. We have a system called "Rule of Law". We try to decide in a clear-headed fashion what will make sense to balance all interests in all situations, and we write down these rules so that they can be applied equally in all cases in the future. But they cannot. It is impossible. Once again, it is impossible. It is absolutely impossible to be able to legislate everything in advance, before it comes up. This is why all rule making needs to include "wiggle room". A way to allow reasonable ways to permit reasonable things to happen and still obtain a fair result. In City Codes, the "wiggle room" that allows the City to achieve a fair result - even when the rules as written are not being fully complied with - is the device of a variance issued upon petition and thoughtful consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. No one is smart enough to describe for all cases in advance, how to obtain a just, harmonious result that advances the interests of the City and yet does not over-restrict the freedoms and abilities of its residents. It just can't be done, by anyone. So wiggle room must be designed into the system, so that when a case comes along that calls out for a variance from the overall general rule, there is an ability to thoughtfully consider it and grant it if appropriate. This is one of those cases. This is a specific case when a fair result can only be obtained by allowing a variance from what the overall, written rule is as stated in the ordinance. Consider for yourself which leads to a fairer, more thoughtful result - the Rule of Law, as expressed in the Ordinance for all time for all neighborhoods for all situations ... or the thoughtful, considered examination of the Commission and Council case-by-case basis to see which cases have merit that indicates a variation should be, in at least this specific case, granted. There is no question that the fairer, more thoughtful result is almost always what a fair-minded judge of the specific situation determines is reasonable. Yet, we need to base our system on the Rule of Law, because we don't always have those who are fair-minded, capable, and willing to serve, in office to judge the individual situation. If we did not have Rule of Law, we could be vulnerable to Rule by Tyrant. So we use the Rule of Law approach in all our Codes, yet we always build into the overall rules a way to bring individual attention to individual situations. In order to bring fair, just, and reasonable results to each case that simply cannot be legislated in advance. That needs to have thoughtful, individual attention to conclude, in this specific case what is just. Every case is individual and will differ somewhat. It is for these reasons, and because this is a good improvement - for both Mrs. Anderson and for the City- that the variance procedure should be resorted to in order to obtain a specific fair result in this specific case. 2 -2183- 5. Sightlines and viewlines. At the previous Planning Commission meeting there was a brief discussion of how Mrs. Anderson's request would impact the ability of her neighbors to see the lake, how it might change or alter their view. The answer to this question is three-fold: First, there is no statute, ordinance, or Code provision that entitles a property owner to keep his or her existing view across other properties. Think about it. If there were such a right, none of us could ever build or develop on our own properties. Because every time we construct a building, we would change the neighbors' view of whatever they had before. This is not a question or issue. No neighbor has the right unilaterally to expect that others will never change his view. Second, it is appropriate however, for the Commission and Council to consider what might be the impact. Because if there is any large negative impact on neighbors' viewlines or sightlines, this can be one element that is weighed when deciding whether the request is a reasonable one. Viewlines and sightlines should be considered. But they are only one element. Third, the viewlines and sightlines of Mrs. Anderson's neighbors is hardly to be affected at all. At my request, her contractor set a ladder in front of each of the neighbors' houses, on the sightline between the neighbors' house and Mrs. Anderson's house. He climbed to a level approximately the height of the neighbors' front windows so his camera could record the angles of sight from their elevation. There was only one picture that demonstrates any appreciable cutting of view from the neighbor's front windows. This picture is attached, with the contractor's pen drawing in the approximate outline of the new solarium to be added above the porch. Other pictures are also included, to show the view from different neighboring properties. It is appropriate to note what impact on view there could be for each neighbor. And if the request were a totally unreasonable one, it would appropriately weigh stronger in considering the specific case for variance. But as the pictures demonstrate, the proposal by Mrs. Anderson cuts off very little view of anyone. It is a reasonable project, and a reasonable request to be granted a variance from the standard setback requirements, the same as the porch enjoys. 6. Neighborhood support. Mrs. Anderson is well known in the neighborhood. As is her situation. She is well liked, and also enjoys the support of the neighborhood. It is a good neighborhood for her to be able to stay in. It also is a factor, one element, to be considered by the Commission and Council. I have telephoned just about every neighbor within view of Mrs. Anderson's existing porch, and asked them if they would support, or if they would object, to her increasing the height of the porch to make a second-floor solarium above. Most of the neighbors I spoke to were highly enthusiastic about supporting her in her situation. Most in fact already knew of her plan, and they volunteered to be willing to write a letter of support to the Commission and Council. I checked with Staff, and was told that there had been absolutely no negative comment that had come in from any neighbor. This is pretty good. This is saying a lot. The closest thing I myself found to opposition was when I called the one neighbor whose view is depicted in the picture that shows the solarium drawn in by the contractor. His name is Gordon Dolan. Mr. Dolan said until I had called he had not known anything about this at all, although he probably did receive a notice from the City. He looked out the window while I was talking with him by telephone, as I took him through considering what impact he might feel from an increase in the roofline of the existing porch. He was thoughtful about it and responded that he would not write a letter of support for Mrs. Anderson, but he would not object to it, either. He would probably not like her roof to be raised, as it does cut off a portion of his view. But in this, Mr. Dolan feels no different from many who might express some initial disappointment if they contemplate that their existing view might be changed. As we have all learned from many cases though, after a project is done and looks nice, a neighbor's concerns about having the view change seem to recede, and ultimately be forgotten about. The point is, that this neighborhood is highly supportive of Mrs. Anderson and her plan, and the most negative thing that can be said is that one neighbor expressed a "won't support, but won't object" thought about it. And to repeat, this is an appropriate element to consider. But there is no ordinance guaranteeing no changes at all in view. And while it is an appropriate consideration as one element of whether the proposal is reasonable, it is not controlling. 3 -2184- 7. Invitation. The Commission and Council cannot always properly determine the fairness and reasonableness of each request for a variance by examining only the written record. Some individual situations require an on-the-ground physical inspection in order to tell what it really is about, and how big or small is the scope of any proposed setback violations. This is such a case. The Commissioners and Council members are earnestly invited to come to the property and view it for themselves. Mrs. Anderson is out of town until after the July 11 Commission meeting, but her contractor is working on the home five houses down and therefore is at hand and available to walk the property with the individual Commissioners and Council members, and to answer any questions regarding what this improvement of Mrs. Anderson's property will really look like when it is finished. How it will be a positive contribution to the neighborhood and to the City. Why it is eminently reasonable to allow a variation of setback requirements, the same as was allowed for the porch. Mrs. Anderson's contractor can be phoned at 320-250-3880, and he would be glad to walk down to meet each visitor who is willing to drive by for a view. 8. Improvement vs. expansion. As a last note, the Commission and Council are properly interested in what comprises an "improvement" that is protected by state statute from over- regulation by City Code ordinances, and what is an "expansion" of an existing use that is not so protected. Here is the secret. There is no "true meaning" of either word, independent of what the people who use and hear the words agree that they should refer to. Words mean only what we agree that they should point to. Thus until two people agree what they each mean by improve- ment and what they each mean by expansion, they can be talking about different things. But this is not the point. It is true that the State has legislated a safe harbor, within which a property owner can expect to make repairs, additions, and the like, without the City having the ability to stop the property owner from doing it. But the point is, that whether the City chooses to describe Mrs. Anderson's proposal as an "improvement" or an "expansion", either way the City is allowed to grant an ordinance. The real point is that this is good idea, a reasonable use of this specific property, that could not have been specifically legislated as reasonable without taking into consideration all the elements of what is proposed and what is going on in the neighborhood. And the City should avail itself of the variance device for obtaining a fair result in this case, as in other cases. This is what the variance procedure is designed and built into the Code for. There is no reason not to use it. It should be used here, in order to obtain the thoughtful, reasonable result for this specific property that the overall Comprehensive Plan never could provide for in this specific case. 4 - 2185- To: Mayor, Council, and Planning Commission of the City of Mound Re: Becky Anderson, 3106 Priest Road, Mound We have been asked to give our thoughts about the request of our neighbor, Becky Anderson, for permission to improve her back porch by adding a solarium to the top of it. We enthusiastically support her request, and hope that the City will grant it. We know that providing this solarium as a workspace is very important to Becky, and not being able to do it would interfere with what we in the neighborhood would consider the normal expectations that a home owner should have of being able to improve their property. It may be that the City needs to allow her a variance from the formal provisions of the building code. But what we believe is that the City should look first at what a reasonable request she is making, and find a way to help her. She isn't going to expand the footprint of her home any farther into any setback requirement area than it already is. And by increasing the height it will not as a practical matter block anyone's view. Rules are good to have. But they need to be interpreted and applied case-by-case so as to bring about good results. We are convinced that a good result in this case would be for the City lo find a way to interpret the city Code so as to help Begky be able to add her solarium. There are lots of our neighbors that have done the same or similar things, and we believe the City ought to be able to find a way for Becky now to do the same thing. Please help her if you can. tj ~ T~imberg rand ~ Kathleen Timberg -2186- Brenda & Gene Peterson 6033 Ridgewood Road Mound, MN 55364-8565 July 6, 2005 To Whom It May Concern: This will confirm that we have no problem, absolutely no problem, with Becky Anderson building a solarium porch on the top of her existing porch on the back of her house. From our understanding, it will not obstruct any neighboring views, and it will improve the appearance and value of her home. As well, the request will give her some needed workspace. This appears to be a normal desire, and we would like to see the Planning Commission and the City Council find ways to help her and allow her to do this. Please consider us in support of her request for the variance. Becky lives at 3106 Priest Lane, and we live at 6017 Ridgewood Road. Sincerely, Brenda L. Peterson Gene L. Peterson - 2187- To the Planning Commission: Our neighbor, Becky Anderson, is desirous of putting a solarium on top of her existing porch. We understand she met some difficulty when her contractor first presented the plans to the Planning Commission, because her house is too close to the high water mark of the lake and too close to the street. It was tabled and will come up again on July 11. We would like to see the City allow her to build this additional improvement to her home, and we hope you can help her find a way to do it. We can say that it would not be a problem to us, and we know of no neighbors at all in the entire neighborhood who would not like to see this happen. Becky has her heart set on being able to write and work in this space that she has designed, and we understand she plans to practically live in it as a place for her to pursue her writing work. So we think it must be planned very well and as a thing of beauty. If there is any way that the city regulations can be interpreted so as to allow her to simply add some height to her existing porch and therefore make it far more usable~ and if it doesn't really interfere with anyone else's enjoyment of the lake or the neighborhood, and if it actually improves the look of the homes in the neighborhood, then this seems like something that the city should be finding a way to help her accomplish. She deserves it. We did the same thing, putting a second story on our home, and we also needed to explain itto the city and get a vadance from the building rules. But we went through the process and it worked fine. The planning commission voted four-to-four and made a "no recommendation" to the city council. Then the city council approved it five-to-zero or something like that. There wasn't really a question of any particular hardship we were put to, it was just that as a practical matter we couldn't enjoy the normal things that you do with a home nearly so much if we weren't able to add our second story. The way it seems to us is, if we qualified to be able to add a story, then Becky Anderson for sure ought to be able to add a room onto the top of her existing porch. It won't hurt anything, and it just seems fair. We need to have the city have rules. But we need to have the city interpret the rules so as to have some flexibility to allow people to do good things. Please help find a way to interpret the rules that will give her permission. -2188- ' ¢ -2189- ~ 5 -2190- -2191 - -2192- -2193- -2194- -2195- -2196- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: June 16, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance(s) - deck replacement OWNER: Becky Anderson CASE NUMBER: 05-40 LOCATION: 3106 Priest Road ZONING: R-1 Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND Becky Anderson is requesting variance(s) approval to replace an existing deck / porch on the lakeside of her home located at 3106 Priest Lane. The requested variance(s) are described as follows: Required ExistinR / Requested Variance Lakeside setback 50 feet 16 feet / 16 feet 34 feet Front / corner setback* 20 feet 19.4 feet / 19.4 feet 0.6 feet *The standard front setback is 30 feet in the R-1 District. However, the City Code allows a "corner" setback of 20 feet for "lots of record" with lot width between 51-81 feet. SITE CONDITIONS The subject property includes a 2-story walkout home which is accessed from Priest Lane and includes a lower level screened porch and upper floor deck. The property fronts Lake Minnetonka on the SE side. The property is deemed to be a corner lot as it fronts both Priest Lane and Ridgewood Road. The applicant is proposing to replace an existing deck and porch with a 4-season room, deck and solarium as the original footings have settled. The proposed new structure will include full frost footings. For details regarding the project, please refer to the building plans and elevation drawings which have been included with the Planning Report. -2197- REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. 60-DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application was received and deemed to be complete on or around May 25, 2005. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that this activity was completed on or about June 16, 2005. ~ DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Copies of the variance application were forwarded to all City departments for review. All written comments which were received are outlined below: Parks Supt. No comments. Public Works Supt. No objections. Police Chief No objections. City Engineer No comments. Police Chief No comments. Building Official Building permit required. Applicant to provide (2) complete sets of building plans to include type of material(s), footing size, block size, joist size, header sizes, etc. City Engineer No comments. -2198- PUBLIC AGENCY COMMENTS A copy of the variance application was forwarded to the DNR Area Hydrologist for review. As of this writing, no comments have been received. DISCUSSION At its May 2, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission deemed the 1994 survey on file with the Building Department acceptable for the purpose of variance review. Previous Land Use Approvals. Resolution No. 88-108 was adopted on August 9, 1988 and recognized the existing nonconforming lakeshore setback of the deck structure to allow structural modifications. Copy attached. Resolution No. 95-15 was adopted on January 24, 2004 and recognized the existing nonconforming setbacks for allow construction of a second story addition and conforming deck for the property. Copy attached. Resolution No. 77-403 was approved on September 13, 1977 to allow installation of a 60 inch fence to be constructed in the front yard(s). o As indicated on the survey, the existing deck / porch is located approximately 16 feet (+/-) from the 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) and is therefore nonconforming. Additionally, the NE corner of the deck/porch does not meet the required 20 foot setback from Ridgewood Drive as it is located 19.4 feet from the property line. The proposed new deck/porch/solarium is proposed to be constructed in the exact location as the existing structure and therefore does not increase the nonconformity on either the lakeside or along Ridgewood Drive. ° The 1994 survey includes the 50 foot setback from the 929.40HWM for the property. As depicted on the survey, a significant portion of the house is located within the 50 foot lakeshore setback area. 5. A deck is considered to be a standard feature for lots with lakeside views. o Hardcover for lots of record is up to (40) percent. The hardcover sheet submitted by the applicant shows lot size of 19,295 SF and proposed hardcover of 2814 SF. However, Hennepin County website shows the lot size to be approximately 13,437 SF. Based on Staff calculations, the project is still compliant with the hardcover regulations but suggests a revised calculation sheet be submitted. 7. Variance(s) were granted previously in 1998 and 1995 which recognized the nonconforming deck and porch. -2199- 8. The lake encompasses the SE corner of the subject property. 9. Approximately one-half of the lot is located within the 50-foot lakeshore setback area. 10. If the deck structure was moved 0.6 feet south of its current location (19.4 feet from front lot line) it would be conforming however it would not line up with the existing building line of the house. 11 .No grading or filling activity is allowed below the 931.0 floodplain elevation unless a floodplain alteration permit is approved by the City Council. The RFPE for the City of Mound is 933.0. The contractor has indicated that the lowest floor is at or above the RFPE. 12. Steps are an allowable encroachment within all setback area(s) as long as they are located no less than 2 feet from any lot line. 13.The proposed new structure meets the side setback requirement of (6) on the south side. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council to allow replacement of the existing deck/porch at 3106 Priest Road subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its June 20, 2005 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for review at its June 28, 2005 meeting. 4 -2200- .]un 16 05 08:~8a p.2 5341 Nlay~ood Road. Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow. Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No,_ (~1~ City Council Date Please type or print legibly PROPERTY LEGAL Lot ( Block ~ ZONING DISTRICT R-lA R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 Phone Home ~7~z. v~ ~ ~>~.~ Work Fax APPLIC~T . Name_ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ (IF OTHER Has an application ever been made for zomng, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( -')' No (). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and-~-7-Pr°vide copies of resolutions, ~~~" Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stodes, type of Use, etc.): Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 4 of 6 -2201 - 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for th~ zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (~. If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): ./ Front Yard: Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: ( ~ ) ~ ft. / (,,' ~,./~ ft. ;~ v ' +/- ft. / : (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ff. Lot Size: sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft .sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (,~, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ,-)"other: specify -r"o~, ,..Jo Variance Information (10/2812004) Page 5 of 6 -2202- 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (~. If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No (,-~. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~, No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the vadance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature Date Applicant's Signature Date Vadance Information (10/28/2004) Page 6 of 6 -2203- Jun 1~ 05 08:48a PROPERTY ADDESS: .3/~ OWNER'S NAME: HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) ,LOT ARF..A../,"~ ~,~-~' _ SQ, ft. X 30% = (for all tots) ...... ' ' Ii ~,.?.,~' ................... ~o~ ^,~^_ ~ ~o. ~]-. x,0%= ~,o, ~o,, o, ~.~o,~ ............................. ! 7-7/7 "Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided l/~at technki'uas are utilized, as outlined-In Zoning Ordinance Sec0on 350:1225, Subcl. 6.B.1 (see back), A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official HOUSE .DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAG~SHED) LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... X = DRN'EWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... :z..1, X f/ = _ ~.&. X DECKS Open decl~ (1/4" min. Opening between beards) with a pervious surface under are not counted aa harclcover. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ X = TOTAL DECK TOTAL OTHER TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE.,i ...... UNDER/~a~$;~(indicate difference) .................................................................... PREPARED BY ~ ~,. %' ~v.f Revised 08106/03 DATE -2204- -2205- -2206- - 2207 -2208- -2209- 194 August 9, 1988 RESOLUTION 88-108 RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 2~ HIGHLAND SHORES~ PID #23-117-24-34-0075 (3106 PRIEST LANE)~ P & Z CASE %88-716. WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming lakeshore setback of 14.5 feet to 'allow structural modifications to a deck and screened-in porch for Lot 1, Block 2, Highland Shores~ PID %23-117-24-34- 0075; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 single family zoning district, which according to the city code requires a 50 foot setback to lakeshore, 10 foot side yard set- back, and a 30 foot front yard setback; and, WHEREAS, Section 23.404' Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful noncon- forming residential unit when the alteration will improve the livability thereof but the alteration may not increase the number ..of units, land, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval with modifications to the ap- plication. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: That the city does hereby authorize the existing non- conforming principal structure setback to lakeshore at 3106 Priest Lane; PID 923-117-24-34-0075 with an ap- proximate 19 foot setback. .2. The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation and authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and expressed understanding that the use remains as a lawful,, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions .of Section 23.404. It is determined that the livability of the residential unit will be approved by authorizing the following al- terations to a nonconforming use property due to the narrowness and Shape of the parcel: 1 -2210- 195 August 9, 1988 the e×i~tlng deck, with ~creened-ln porch, ~hall be reconstructed 4 feet to the south of the exist- ing main house, conditioned upon the survey being revised to indicate the exact location of the structure and the shoreline setback. This variance is granted for the following legally ~escribed property: Lot 1, Block 2, Highland Shores PID # 23-117-24-34-0075 This variance shall be recorded with the county re- corder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, Section 462.3595, Subdivision (4). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 'The property owner shall have the responsibility for filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Mayor Smith and seconded by Councilmember Jensen. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel, Jensen, Jess·n, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none· Ms(yor / Attes{: city Cl~k 2 -2211 - CITY ()f MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 August 26, 1988 Warren F. & Alvlna T. Shaffer 3106 Priest Lane Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. & Mrs. ShaFfer: As per your request of the setback variance of Lot l, Block 2, Highland Shores~ PID #23-117-24 34 0075, please find enclosed a copy of the certified city council resolution authorizing your variance. This variance resolution must be filed by you at the Henneptn County Recorder oFFice, as Follows: Henneptn County Recorder BO3 A Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487-0083 Please note that there is a $10.00 fee for the filing of this document. For your convenience, we have enclosed a copy of the resolution for your records. Sincerely, an Bertrand Building Official Enclosure JB=pJ An equal opportunity Employer that does not discriminate on the bas~s o! race. color, national origin, or handicapped status in the admission or access to_ ~?1-~:-3t or employment in. its programs and activities. RK~OLUTION RF~OLITrION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACKS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A SECOND STORY ADDITION AND A CONFORMING DECK AT 3106 PRIEST LANE, LOT 1, BLOCK 2, HIGHLAND SHORES, PID g23-117-24 34 0075 P&Z CASE g9~--02 WHEREAS, the owner, Don Anderson, has applied for recognition of the following variances to allow construction of an addition above the garage that follows the existing footprint and therefore does not further expand the existing nonconform-ing setbacks. The proposal itself does not increase the existing footprint except for the deck that is fully conforming Existing Required Variance Front (W) 26' +/- 30' 4' +/- Side (N) 19.5' +/- 20' 0.5' +/- Lake 16' +/- 50' 34' +/- and WHEREAS, existing and proposed hardcover is conforming, and WHEREAS, this property is located in the R-1 Zoning District which allows only single family dwellings and requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet, a front yard setback of 30 feet to Priest Lane, a front yard setback of 20 feet to Ridgewood Road, and a side yard setback of 8 feet to the south. A 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water is also required, and WHEREAS, the existing nonconformities have been previously recognized by Resolution//88-716, and WHEREAS, the proposed floor plan indicates that the only exit from the new room addition is through the garage, there is no current access to the existing dwelling from the proposed addition. There is concern about creating another dwelling unit, and WHEREAS, the applicant has been notified by staff and was further informed by the Planning Commission during a public meeting that the Mound Zoning Code specifically prohibits two dwelling units on the subject property, and WHEREAS, the applicant has been informed and understands that subsequent owners of the subject property shall only be permitted to use the home as a single family dwelling, and 53 -2213- January 24, 1995 ~, a doorway connecting to thc existing dwelling is planned to be framed, so in the future the room may be used as the master bedroom, however at this time, they do not want the doorway installed, and WIEEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously recommended approval of the variance request, subject to conditions. NOW, TI:tE~EFORE, BE IT RESOL~, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: e e e The City does hereby grant a variance recognizing thc existing nonconforming setbacks to allow construction of a second story addition and a deck that is conforming to setbacks, subject to the following: Existing Required Variance Front (W) 26' +/- 30' 4' +/- Side (N) 19.5' +/- 20' 0.5' +/- Lake 16' +/- 50' 34' +/- The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 350:420, Subdivision 8 of the Zoning Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land: Construction of a 24' x 24~ second story addition, and a 4' x 20' deck. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lot 1, Block 2, Highland Shores. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. 54 -2214- January 24, 1995 The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Hanus and seconded by Councilmember Jensen. The following Councilmembers voted 'in the affirmative: Hanus, Ahrens, lensen, lessen, and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Mayor Attest: City Clerk 55 - 2215- Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: HOUSE or BUTLDZNG #: 3106 STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters} Pdest Lane UNIT # (if applicable) 20 ~;~ records per page Hennepin nty, Property Information Search The Hennepin County Property Tax web data daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Click Here for the 2005 State Cop_y~o_ be used when filing for ; 23-117-24-34-0075 3106 PI~EST LA MOUND 277 Constrt 3 Approx. I REBECCA -1 ANDERSON REBECCA .1 ANDERSON 3106 PRZEST LA MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales [nforma Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FTLE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Abstract or Torrens: HIGHLAND SHORES 001 002 TORRENS Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Values Established by Assessor as of Estimated Market Value: Umited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $487,000 $441,400 $441,400 $5,261.61 $315.83 $70.40 $5,647.84 Property lnformation Detail for Taxes Values Established by Assessor as of 3; http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresult.jsp -2216- 6/15/2005 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 2 Hennepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 6/6/2005 at 1:00 PM ZOOM PAN READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Approxima te Appr oxima te Property ID Property Perimeter Prepert'~ Area acres Property Address Market Value Total T~x {2005) 3106 PRIEST LA $ 487,000 $ 5,647.84 MOUND, MN 55364 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax infbrmation page for the property you have selected The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612) 348-2618 or via e-mail at B_ob _Moulder@_co.hennepj~..mn.u~ The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation. http://www 19.co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrimap.dll?name=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALU... 6/15/2005 -2217- -2218- Executive Summary Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: July 20, 2005 SUBJECT: PC Case #05-42/#05-43 Schneewind/Teeters Minor Subdivision/Variances The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their July 11th meeting where a motion for denial of the minor subdivision and variances was recommended on a 6-2 vote. The Planning Commission felt that there were too many variances required for the minor subdivision and hardship was not demonstrated. The major issue of concern was the variances needed for each parcel to the required 40 feet of street fi:ontage. Staff had recommended approval of the minor subdivision and variances with the findings of fact identified on page 5 of the Planning Report. Members of the City Council are advised that a resolution has not been prepared in advance of the meeting due to the conflicting recommendation from Staff and the Planning Commission. The applicant has submitted the attached comments for City Council consideration. In addition to facts the applicant would like the City Council to consider, he has identified some possible ways the subdivision could be modified to address City concerns. The applicant is open to discussing other modifications which would meet City needs and enable him to redevelop this property. Also of concern is the DNR's comment that the lots are under the 10,000 square feet lot area requirement for lakeshore lots. The DNR contends that in 1994 the City and the DNR agreed that lots would need to be at least 10,000 square feet in size. However, City Code Chapter 350.1225 states that the lot size and width standards for residential lots within the shoreland area shall be as found in the applicable sections of the Mound City Code. City staff continues to work with the DNR to determine how to address this discrepancy and hopes to have additional information at the City Council meeting. Of note, the minor subdivision and variance application(s) were submitted and deemed to be complete on June 1st. Minnesota State Statues allows 120 day for governmental action of the minor subdivision. However, Minnesota State Statutes only allows 60 days for governmental action on a variance request unless an extension is executed within the 60 day timeframe. The City's deadline for action on the variances is July 30% Therefore, as a resolution will not be available for the July 26th meeting but will likely be acted upon at the August 8th meeting, an extension will need to be executed in advance of the July 30th deadline. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2219- Additional Information 1. Parks Supt. Jim Fackler has provided a copy of a 1999 agreement between the current owners (Plaza) and the City of Mound regarding the location of a City dock(s) on Devon Commons which abuts the Plaza property. A copy has been provided to the applicant(s) and has also been included with the application materials. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2220- Comments from the Applicant Facts to consider · Property has always been platted as two lots. Both lots significantly exceed minimum lot size requirements, almost conforming to R-1 zoning (proposed lots are approximately 9,000 SF ca, 6000 SF is required in R- lA). Proposed subdivision would remove the current encroachment in place over the right of way. - The existing storage sheds, boats, and debris will be removed from the property. - The new home construction on the lots will enhance neighborhood property values. - Both lots exceed frontage requirements at the setback, the odd shape of the lots leave little road frontage and substantial lakeshore. - Other lots on same street do not have 40'. - Proposed subdivision meets new hardcover requirements. - Tim and Mary Johnson (Adjacent neighbor at 4547 Island View Drive) are in favor of lot split and property improvements. - The parcels as originally platted would not have been in conformance with R1A minimum frontages on an improved street with Parcel 1 having 18' of frontage and Parcel 2 having $0' of frontage. Possibilities to Consider Could we pay to make improvements to Aberdeen St. making a cul-de-sac and therefore meet frontage requirements? Could we install shared driveway to maximize safety and minimize curb cuts? Could we buy 11' of frontage from the right of way if the city does not want it improved? - Could we trade some lakeshorc with the city for road frontage? -2221 - MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 2005 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #05-42105-23 MINOR SUBDIVISION/VARIANCE 4539 ISLAND VIEW DR - RANDY SCHNEEWIND AND BRIAN TEETERS Mueller felt it wasn't in conformance with the Shoreland ordinance. Trapp indicated the only width provision they don't meet is the street frontage requirement of 40 feet. It was pointed out that these are technically not lake lots because of the commons property. Joe Bush, applicant's representative: Curt Cornelia: The Commission confirmed that the issue is the lack of 40 foot frontage at the street. It was commented by Commissioners that it is a great large lot for a big house. Cornelia said we talk about wanting bigger lots. These are 9,000 square feet, 3,000 bigger than required. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Mueller, to recommend Council approval with the provision to remove the shed on the MOTION approved. For: Mueller Opposed: Miller, Ayaz, Hasse, Osmek, Michael, Glister, Schwingler. MOTION by Michael, second by Hasse, to deny the application. Michael withdrew the motion, Hasse agreed. MOTION by Osmek, second by Mueller, to reconsider the previous motion. MOTION failed. In favor: Ayaz, Osmek, Michael, Schwingler and Mueller. Against: Miller, Hasse and Glister. MOTION by Michael, second by Hasse, to deny the application. MOTION carried. In favor: Miller, Ayaz, Hasse, Michael, Schwingler, Mueller. Against: Osmek and Mueller. Findings: Asking for 2 variances to split a lot. Lack of demonstrated hardship. -2222- made and entarad into as of the.] day of ,1999 by and be~een the CI~ OF MOUND, a Minnesota municipal co~ormion/(O~") and ~Y~;h~7;~Zg-NAV~TE and GIN~ MILLER-P~ ("PI~'). BACKGROUND 1. Plazas are the owners of land in the City of Mound having a street address of 4539 Island View Drive and legally described as Lots 1 & 2,' Block 1, Devon. ("Plaza Property") 2. The City is the owner of land which is legally described as Lots 71 and 72 Phelp's Island Park First Division.("City Property") 3. The two properties are separated by a 25-foot wide street which lies within the Phelp's Island Park First Division plat. 4. The Plaza Property is separated from Lake Mianetonka by a public common which is generally known as Devon Common. 5. The City Property is separated from Lake Minnetonka by a private common which, for the purposes of this agreement will be called Phelp's Common. 6. The City maintains a park on the City Property, and maintains a park and a multiple slip dock on the Phelp's Common 7. The City also maintains, controls and regulates the public commons within the City, including Devon Common, so that they may be available for recreational use by the public to the. greatest extent possible. Among the activities which the City regulates is the number, location and placement of docks on the commons. 8. The City is undertaking the alteration of the multiple slip dock located on Phelp's Common. The alteration will make available to the public locations for.at least 3 additional boats. The City Council is of the opinion that this alteration is a necessary and important feature of its recreation programs. The design of the dock has been approved by official action of the City Council. 9. The location of the new dock will be sub that it will encroach and cross the extension of the sideyard line of the Plaza Property extended across Devon Common and into Lake Minnetonka. 10. ! Concern has been raised regarding whether it is a legitimate use of the City's authority to locate and expand a multiple dock at such a location. 11. The City has proposed that the parties enter into this agreement which would have the effect of resolving that potential objection -2223- 12. ~The City belle',es that the stability~ and certainty which this agreement will' .Provide it in the administration o fits dock program is sufficient reason to enter into this agreement. .. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto do stipulate and agree as follows: The Plazas, for themselves, and their successors in interest to the Plaza property do hereby consent and agree that the City may locate, erect, continue and maintain any structure, including without limitation either a single or multiple slip dock configuration on Phelps Common; provided however, that no such structure may be located further south than 143 feet southwest (measured along the shoreline) of the north property, line of the City Property, and further that the City will not otherwise allow any additional dock locations on that portion of Devon Commons lying between the extended side lot lines of the Plaza Property. The City agrees that it will keep and abide by and follow the provisions of this agreement. The Plazas agree for themselves and their successors and assigns that for so long as the City shall keep and abide by the provisions of this agreement, they will make no claim, nor support any claim or cause of action wherein the City's authority to maintain a structure at such location is an issue. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands as of the day and year first above written. C~w.//__.O F MOUND . By: Pat Meisel~ Its: Mayor By: ~ran Clark Its: City Clerk/Acting City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ' )ss. COUNTY ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this //~"~ day of .:7-,,,z_ c/ , 1999,, by Pat Meisel and Fran Clark the Mayor and City Clerk/Acting City Manager respectively of the CITY OF MOUND, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. c-~'l%tary Public I~,:.kq~.j) M~ co~,,,ass:oN Exnl. rr..s 2 -2224- ': Rodri~o' ?laza-N~ayarette,/'- '"h -~ller-maza ~_~ STATE OF MIZNN~OTA ) )ss. co~ OF//~-~,-_.) / .The foregoing instrument was acknowledged be~/"re me this/~'~(-~ay oi _ ~'~'l~r~ ,~j~Fby Rodrigo Plaza-Navarette and ~ny Mille/~Plaza to me 'known to be ~ ~ot:~,u~l~~ 3 -2225- PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp DATE: July 7, 2005 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision/Variance APPLICANT: Randy Schneewind/Brian Teeters CASE NUMBERS: 0542 & 05-43 HKG FILE NUMBER: 05-05 LOCATION: 4539 Island View Drive Property ID: 30-117-22-21-0001 ZONING: R-IA Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND The applicants, Randy Schneewind and Brian Teeters, have submitted an application for a minor subdivision to divide the single parcel into two parcels. The property is located at the intersection of Island View Drive and Aberdeen Road. The property as currently held includes approximately 18,200 square feet. Site topography slopes west to east with an elevation change of about 12 feet over the approximately 180 feet from Island View Drive to Lake Minnetonka. According to Hermepin County data the current residence on the property was constructed in 1930. The existing home and garage are to be removed and replaced with two new homes. There are deciduous and coniferous trees identified on the survey of the property. The proposed home locations may impact these trees. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2226- p. 2 #05-42 & 05-43 4539 Island View Drive Minor Subdivision/Variance July 7, 2005 Parcel 1 Lot Area Lot Width (as platted measurement) Lot Depth (as-platted measurement) Sideyards Frontyard Rear/Lakeside (Lake Minnetonka) Hardcover (maximum) Proposed Required Variance 9,126 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 42 feet 40 feet 100+ feet 80 feet 10 feet 10 feet 20 feet 20 feet 50 feet 50 feet 2,738 sq. ft. 2,738 sq. ft. Parcel 2 Lot Area Lot Width (as platted measurement) Lot Depth (as platted measurement) Sideyards Frontyard Rear/Lakeside (Lake Minnetonka) Hardcover (maximum) 8,897 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 40 feet 40 feet 100+ feet 80 feet 10 feet 10 feet 20 feet 20 feet 50 feet 50 feet 2,669 sq. ft. 2,669 sq. ft. The R1-A District requires a minimum of 40 feet of lot frontage on an improved public street. While it was not noted by the applicants in their request for a variance, Parcel 1 will need a four foot variance to this requirement while Parcel 2 will need a seven foot variance. Prior to the construction of the current residence in 1930 the property was two parcels. The parcels as originally platted would not have been in conformance with these regulations, as Parcel 1 only had 18 feet of frontage while Parcel 2 had 50 feet. In light of the odd shape of this parcel, the applicants have configured the minor subdivision the best way possible to provide for two homes. Parcel 1 also requires a setback variance along the north property line. Aberdeen Road has platted right-of- way which continues to the lakeshore. There is an unimproved path in the fight-of-way providing public access to the lake. Non-lot of record parcels are required to provide the required front yard setback along every street, which would be 20 feet for this parcel. Requiring the 20 foot of setback would limit the ability of the parcel to be developed. In addition, as the area serves more as a side yard than front yard the request to vary the setback to 10 feet seems reasonable. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Fire Chief Pederson Police Chief Kurtz Public Works Supt. Skinner Metro West Inspection Asst. City Engineer Dehler No comments No comments Survey does not show existing or proposed water/sewer. Information will need to be provided with building permit(s). No permanent structure(s) to be constructed and/or placed in utility easement. No comments Incorporated in report. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2227- p. 3 #05-42 & 05-43 4539 Island View Drive Minor Subdivision/Variance July 7, 2005 Parks Director Fackler No comments UTILITY COMPANY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved utility companies for review. All written comments have been summarized below: Reliant Energy / Minnegasgo Excel Energy No comments. No comments. DISCUSSION · The minor subdivision requires three variances. A variance for each of the proposed parcels for the 40 foot lot/~ontage along a public street. Parcel 1 also requires a 10 foot variance to the 20 foot required setback along the Aberdeen Road right-of-way. The applicants have identified the proposed building areas with both parcels having about 2,700 square feet of building area. The survey does not indicate where there are to be attached garages. The applicant should be advised that at least 840 square feet of area, not including any garage, must be provided to meet city code. The hardcover calculations provided only include the homes. The survey indicates that the driveways will be made of pervious materials. The applicant should be advised that typical pervious materials are not 100% pervious. Thus revisions may be necessary to ensure hardcover percentages for each parcel do not exceed the 30% maximum for non-lot of record parcels. If the applicant is proposing to use pervious pavers, a submittal of as-built survey all area(s) where pervious pavers product to certify that the installation was done according to submitted specifications signed by professional engineer. Staff suggests the applicant contact the manufacturer of the pervious paver product to determine what inspections will be required to provide for "sign-off" on the as-built survey by the manufacturer. Applicant should be advised that inspection(s) at specific intervals may be required. Installation of the pervious paver by a commercial contractor is required. The Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) for the City of Mound is 933 feet. Floodplain regulations require that the lowest flood of all structures including basements and crawl spaces must be constructed at or above the RFPE. The survey indicates that the proposed lowest floor elevations are 933 feet. Additional information regarding home elevations will need to be provided with the building permit application. Sanitary sewer and watermain trunk charges must be paid in connection with the connection fees for the additional parcel. The present trunk charges are $1,500 each for sanitary sewer and watermain connection. A connection fee of $240 each will be charged for the sewer and water services for the newly created building site. · The installation of new water and sewer service must be completed or some type of financial guarantee provided, such as a cash deposit, letter of credit or performance bond. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2228- p. 4 #05-42 & 05-43 4539 Island View Drive Minor Subdivision/Variance July 7, 2005 · A survey with detailed grading and erosion control shall be included with the application for a building permit. · Drainage and utility easements should be provided along all lot lines as required by city code. Construction within existing easements is not allowed. · Water and sewer service locations are to be approved by Mound Public Works department. · If approved, the minor subdivision would create a new parcel, triggering park dedication fees of $1100 (Section 330.120 Subd. 3). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve the minor subdivision request with the following conditions: 1. The lots have a non-lot of record status. 2. Drainage and utility easements be provided along side lot lines 5 feet in width, rear lot lines 10 feet in width and front lot lines 10 feet in width. Construction within existing easements is not allowed. 3. The City Engineer review grading and drainage easements and plans prior to building permit approval. Installation of the pervious pavers by a commercial contractor is required. Submittal of as-built survey all area(s) where pervious pavers product to certify that the installation was done according to submitted specifications signed by professional engineer shall be required. 5. Additional information about building floor elevation shall be provided with building permit application. 6. Installation of utilities prior to the issuance of building permit or provide financial guarantee to cover the cost of utility service connections prior to the release of the Resolution for recording. 7. Locations of water and sewer services to be approved by Mound Public Works department. 8. Payment of sanitary sewer and watermain trunk charges of $1,500.00 each respectively for Parcel A. 9. Payment of sanitary sewer and water connection fees of $240.00 each respectively for Parcel A. 10. Park dedication fee of $1,100.00 be paid prior to the release of the Resolution for recording. 11. Payment of any City fees for review of the minor subdivision and variance applications. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve a 10 foot front yard variance along Aberdeen Road right-of-way for Parcel 1 with the following conditions and findings: 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2229- p. 5 #05-42 & 05-43 4539 Island View Drive Minor Subdivision/Variance July 7, 2005 1. Payment of any City fees for review of the minor subdivision and variance application. Findings of fact in support of the variance: 1. The Aberdeen Road right-of-way currently has an unimproved road which provides access from the adjacent park and Island View Drive to the lake. Thus, the northeast property line serves more as a side yard than a front yard to the property. 2. Allowing the setback to be reduced to 10 feet will not be a detriment to the purposes of the Ordinance. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve a four foot front lot frontage on a public street for Parcel 1 with the following conditions and findings: 1. Payment of any City fees for review of the minor subdivision and variance application. Findings of fact in support of the variance: 1. The site, originally platted for two parcels with non-conforming street frontages, has been configured as best as possible to provide street frontage to both lots in spite of the odd shape of the parcel. 2. Allowing the street frontage variance will not be a detriment to the purposes of the Ordinance. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approve a seven foot front lot fi'ontage on a public street for Parcel 2 with the following conditions and findings: 1. Payment of any City fees for review of the minor subdivision and variance application. Findings of fact in support of the variance: 1. The site, originally platted for two parcels with non-conforming street frontages, has been configured as best as possible to provide street frontage to both lots in spite of the odd shape of the parcel. 2. Allowing the street frontage variance will not be a detriment to the purposes of the ordinance. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338-0800 Fax (612) 338-6838 -2230- C~I3'Y OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. PLANNING COMM. DATE CITY COUNCIL DATE: CASE NO. Please type or print clearly EXISTING Subject Address PROPERW LEGAL Lot 5' DESCRIPTION Pl~ ~-. APPLICANT 'Theappli~nti.: ~owner ~other: (ifOWNER~ot er t~an 'Name" ~obi~c~) applicant) Address SURVEYO~ N~me ~ ~'~~ ENGINEER Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of as may be required by law. Date ignature Date Minor Subdivision Information (10/28/2004) Page 4 of 4 -2231- MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow. Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. .t/~~~' -z~ City Council Date Please type or print ie![tib.ly PROPERTY Lot '~,i~-~-~ L_~ LEGAl. DESC. Subdivision ~%:,~) ~; ....... P~D# B~//'Ty~-~Z/O~?O/ .., P~at# ZONING DISTRICT R*I ~___~1..~., R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 Phone Ho~ q~.~ tO~rk Fax APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER... THAN Address ~ Z..~. ~ ~ ~,'*i ~'"~. -~' ] / ,~/~. ~%,:" OWNER) Phone Home Wor Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No 0/.). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): ~/.,P_.C,~'ct Lc:T' 1 i~l~C/~_ I 4....c r~'g'~'~' '~',,.,', _./ ~:~..,,..,?<:, /.. ~.,'C::,'C- V:*ri~.oe Information ('10/28/2004) P~ge 4 of 6 -2232- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning distdct in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ("//.,). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): REQUIRED REQUESTED hs 8A r SETBACKS: VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E(~) ~ ~-~ ft. ~.-O ft. ~ ft. Side Yard: ~ E W ) ~ ft. / O ft. ! ~ ft, Side Yard: ( Ni~E W ) I ~ ft. //~ ft. ~ ft. Rear Yard: ( U S(~W ) ~ ~ ft. 5 ~ ft. ~ ft. Lakeside: ( N S(~W ) ~ ft. ~ ~ ft. (~ ft. : (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: z:~-L/~ ft. ~ ft. ~, ft. Lot Size: ~ ©©.~2 sq ft c)/2-~- sq ft ~ sq ft Hardcover: ~-~-~"~ sq ft ~..~'z~ ,sq ft ~ sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (~,,), No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? (X) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 5 of 6 -2233- Case No. 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ~, No (). If yes, explain: .......... " ....... · . ,, ---'/ ,~.~... 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road'7. Yes (), No (,,~. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (~), No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? g. Comments; I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, ma!ntaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. ~ Owner's Signature ~';--~ ~, '~.~1~ ~~~ Applicant's ~lgnature~. '~::.::: ................... Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 6 of 6 -2234- CITY OF MOUND PROPERTY ADDESS: OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA c) LOT AREA HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .................................... SQ.-FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. [-- * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... DRIVEWAY, PARKING X = AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. X = DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ X = X = X = TOTAL DECK ....................................................... X = TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... I UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................................................................... I PREPARED BY ~ ~'~-~-J~'~ ~'T-'~-~-~::~-~--~ DATE Revised 11/24/04 -2235- PROPERTY ADDESS: OWNER'S NAME'. LOT AREA LOT AREA HARDCOVER C.ALCULAT IONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFAOE COVERAGE) SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques am utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS~ ETC. · TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.:, :,; ........ ,,, .............. X '= DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcOver. TO?AL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........... ... ...... . ......... X = X = TOTALDECK ....................................................... X = TOTAL OTHER .................................. TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................................................................... PREPARED BY ¢~!r-] '"'r~ ~'- ~'~ ~ Io DATE 5/Zr.. ~;/0-~ Revised 08~06~03 -2236- P:\20052541\d~g\200525~lCERT,d~g 5/26/2005 ll:OB~05 AN CDT ? I P,\~OO52541\d~g\~OOS~541CERT,dwg 5/26/2005 11,08:05 Akl CDT ? / / / / / ? / Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: To: Sent: Subject: "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> "Julie Ekman" <julie.ekman@dnr.state.mn.us> Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:09 AM Re: Comments: subdivision at 4539 Island View Dr. Hi Julie. Thanks for your comments. For clarification: The zoning of property is R-IA SFR which allows a 6000 SF lot size. Per City Code Chapter 350.1225, Subd. 1 (Shoreland Management Lot Area and Width Standards), the lot area and width standards for residential, commercial and industrial lots within the shoreland area shall be as found in the applicable sections of the Mound Zoning Code. ..... Original Message ..... From: "Julie Ekman" <julie.ekman~dnr.state.mn.us> To: <sarahsmith~cityofmound.c om> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:29 AM Subject: Comments: subdivision at 4539 Island View Dr. Sarah, Subdividing this lot will result in two lots smaller than the minimum lot size of' 10,000 square feet. In 1994 city had requested flexibility from state shoreland standards to allow 10,000 sq ft rather than the standard 15,000 sq ft requirement for General Development lakes. The 10,000 sq ft request was approved. I've attached a scan of the approval letter. Julie Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist West Metro, Central Region 3 Mn Department of Natural Resources-Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106-6793 (651) 772-7919 (651) 772-7977 fax j ulie.ekman~dnr, state.mn.us Visit DNR Waters' website at: http://www.dnr, state.rnn.us/waters/ - 2239- 7/18/2005 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Sarah Smith, Cadton Moore Ray Hanson July 5, 2005 Ordinance Changes Please review and comment on the following ordinance changes: 1. Survey Requirements: I have made additions to the requirements and added a foundation survey requirement. I believe section 300.10 Subd. 2, allows us to make these updates without city council approval, I have attached and high-lighted a copy of that language. '~ ~ ~.'i~ . 'ii. ~:i. -2240- Mound City Code Page 1 of 1 Subd. 2. Plat Plan. Each application for a building permit shall also be accompanied by a survey by a registered surveyor or civi~ engineer and a plat p~an of the premises, drawn to scale, showing the location and actual dimensions and extent of land or lot upon which it is proposed to construct, alter, or place a building or structure, the location of corner and angle posts or stakes, the proposed location of the proposed building or structure, or proposed alterations or additions to existing buildings or structures upon the same premises, building on adjacent premises, the extent and location of open spaces and yards required by the ordinance, the location or proposed location of any wells, sewer lines, cesspools, septic tanks, water lines, or other facilities in existence or designed to serve the uses located or to be located upon such premises, and in the case of lands or lots having a surface gradient of more than 5 feet in 100 feet over the proposed location of the proposed building, such topographical information as may be required to determine the location and relative elevation of a proposed building or structure, and such other information as the Building Inspector or City Council may require. The locations of wells, sewer and water lines, cesspools, septic tanks, and such other appurtenances proposed to be placed on the premises shall be subject to the approval of the Building Inspector. The City Council may by resolution waive the requirement of a survey if there are special circumstances or conditions so that the strict application of the provisions of this subsection are not necessary to preserve the public health, safety and general welfare. The Council shall make a finding that the waiver of the survey requirements will not be detrimental to the public welfare. The application for the variance shall be in writing and may be processed by the City Council without processing said variance in accordance with the terms of Section 325 of this Code. · http://www.cityofmound.com/CITY%20CODL-. 2_2~1...7nl 7/21/2005 _ Cl't~Y OF MOUND SURVEY REQUIREMENTS Each certified land survey shall indicate that permanent iron monuments are in place at each lot corner. The survey shall also show the following: 1. North arrow and scale of drawing. 2. Legal description of parcel. 3. Lot area of parcel measured in square feet and dimension of all lot lines. Lot area is measured above the Ordinary High Water as listed below (929.4 for Lake Minnetonka). 4. Dimensions and location of all known easements, and type of easement. Location of all existing buildings. For remodeling or addition permits, dimensions of each building and reference distances from the lot lines to the nearest point of each building must be shown. Location of existing utilities, including but not limited to manholes, hydrants, catch basins power poles, and telephone boxes. Show all existing and proposed sewer and water service locations, and where they come into the structure with dimensional ties. Water shut off cannot be located in the driveway. Front, side, and rear yard setback dimensions to existing and proposed buildings. All outside dimensions of buildings, including decks and fireplaces. Setback dimensions to existing buildings located on adjacent lots if they are within 25 feet of side lot line. First floor and at grade elevations of corners of buildings on adjacent lots. Location of irons at each side lot line establishing proposed front building line. The maintenance of these irons, once established by the surveyor, shall be the responsibility of the building permit applicant. Wood stakes or lath shall be placed at the four corners of the proposed building. 10. Location of proposed driveway, future garage site if not included with building permit application and minimum of two (2) off-street parkway spaces (325 S.F. per stall). 11. Benchmark elevation to National Geodetic Vertical Datum (N.G.V.D.) and description of location. Benchmarks are available at City Hall, 952-472-0600. Survey Requirements (07/15/05) Page 1 of 3 -2242- 12. Grade elevations at the following points (additional elevations may be required by staff): a. Existing and proposed at each lot comer. b. Existing street elevations (centerline and top of curb) at each lot line extended and both sides of proposed driveway at intersection with street. c. Existing elevations on side lot lines, at extension of proposed front and rear building lines and any major grade changes. d. Proposed lowest floor, garage floor, and top of foundation elevations. e. Existing and proposed elevations at all major corners of building. f. Existing and proposed elevations at top and bottom of any major slopes. J~ Proposed finished grade at front building line and/or ordinary high water line. TOP OF BLUFF ,AND SETBACK FROM TOP OF BLUFF. 13. Location and elevations at top and bottom of any proposed retaining walls. 14. Proposed direction of surface water drainage indicated by arrows and elevations, and percent of slope on driveway if applicable. 15. The Ordinary High Water elevation/contour must be shown if lot abuts body of water or is within 50 feet of said water. 16. The Floodplain elevation/contour must be shown (Both MCWD and City). Filling within the floodplain shall not occur without permission from the City of Mound and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Ordinary High Water Flood Elevation Lowest Floor Elevation LAKE 929.4 MCWD 931.5 / CITY 933 MINNETONKA 931 DUTCH LAKE 939.2 940 942 LAKE LANGDON 932.1 935 937 Survey Requirements (07/15/05) Page 2 of 3 -2243- CITY OF MOUND Foundation Survey Requirements As part of the pre-construction site inspection the following staking is required to be completed: 1. Setback dimension stakes on the property line with setback dimension measurement to at least three foundation comers of the proposed structure. 2. Offset and grade stakes to proposed foundation corners. After foundation is in place and prior to construction proceeding, contractor is to have surveyor verify in the field location and elevation of building foundation per building plan requirements and copy given to the City of Mound for approval to proceed. Survey Requirements (07/15/05) Page 3 of 3 -2244- July 11, 2005 CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www. cityofmound.com TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Gino Businar/Kandis Hanson Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator 2005 Spring Clean-up The following is a list to the expenses incurred for the Spring Clean-up (labor not included). Appliances $3,510.00 Furniture Disposal $3308.91 Electronics: $587.60 Nash (Vets) $200.00 Tires $783.00 TOTAL $8389.41 The receipts for the day amounted to $9857.46 Mound Police Dept. 2415 Wilshire Bird Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472~0621 Memo July 13, 2005 Enclosed you will find ~e mid-year 2005 stats for Community Service Officer Timothy Hughes. Thus far CSO Hughes has worked a total of 73 part-time shifts which have varied between 4 to 6 hours per shift. 2005 Stats as of July 12th: 213 Clean Sweep Inspections 192 Ordinance warnings issued 211 Ordinance follow-ups 184 Closed as a result of warnings 8 Pending 6 Citations Issued 15 Animal Complaints 5 Vehicle lockouts (all successhl) -2246- Mound Fire Department Fire Commission Meeting Wednesday, July 20, 2005 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Important Hot Top/cs for Cities and Fire Departments · Grant Award summary - FEMA, Urban Area Security Imitative, Metropolitan Radio Board, Homeland Security and Emergency Management · Homeland Security and Emergency Management Compliance issues: A). Adoption of the National Incident Management System B). Promotion of intrastate mutual aid agreements · Minnesota Fire Code 2003 and International Fire Code 2000 Adoption 2. Fire Contracts, Budget, and Planning · MFD proposed 2005 Budget detail, review, and discussion · 2005 Capital Equipment purchases · Apparatus replacement 15 year plan · Review of MFD Long Term Budget Forecasts · Existing 3 year fire contract renewal reminder · Discussion on MFD fire service contract length · Discussion and input from Fire Commission members L~tlch ......... 3.. Mound Fire Department Miscellaneous · Mound firefighter staffing overview · Insurance Services Office (ISO) audit fall of 2006 4. Adjourn -2247- -2248- m Q' -2249- -2250- -2251 - -2252- -2253- -2254- -2255- ~ ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ m m ~. ~. ~ - ...... = ~ ........... ~ ~,~ , moo ~ omm ~m:mo z oom m mom ~ mmommomoomommozo~momoooom o m m :0 0:0 zm m~ -2256- -2257- -2258- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 18338 Minnetonka Blvd. DeePhaven, MN 55391 (952) 745,0789 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER Gregory S. Nybeck JUly 15, 2005 2005 EWM HarveSting Program: The 2005 EWM Harvesting Program commenced on 6/8/05 with the launching of the harvesting equipment at Spring Park Bay. Harvesting is planned through mid AUgust, with the possibility of late season harvesting depending on growth and economic variables. Harvesting priorities are based upon impediment to public boat navigation on the open water, which is consistent with past years. The South Upper:Lake Option has been implemented in 2005 and milfoii growth has been heavier this year compared to recent years. Harvesting on the .Upper Lake has recently been completed and harvesting has commenced on the LOwer Lake. High growth areas Will be harvested twice, time permitting. 2005 Zebra Mussel Program: The LMCD continues to be concerned about the introduction of other invasive species into Lake Minnetonka, with an emphasis on zebra mussels. During the 2005 boating season, the LMCD has contracted with the MN DNR Inspection Program for 2,200 hours to inspect boats dudng peak period times before they are launched at high volume public accesses on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and holidays from late May through mid August. The LMCD will continue to evaluate how these inspections fit into an overall long-term zebra 'mussel prevention program for Lake Minnetonka Lake Min netonka Boat Density COmmittee: This committee has been established to address boat density and to improve the quality of the experience on Lake Minnetonka. This committee has discusSed a number of topics and the LMCD received valuable public input on them at the 5/11/05 Board meeting. These topics included: I) expectations about safety and the overall experience when using the lake, 2) enforcement of storage and lake use ordinances, 3) the impact of large boats, 4) the violation reporting process 5) separation restr Ctions for personal watercraft, 6) education of lake users, 7) minimum-wake z~nes, 8) density indice's in the 1974 Boat DenSity Policy Statement, and 9) the zoning concept. The committee has taken this public input into consideration and further refinement has been conducted of the committee's goals and recommendations, with the idea of creating ar action plan. We will keep you informed on the progress of this committee. LMCD Code for Deicinq Installations: Last August, the LMCD declared a one-year moratorium on the issuance of new deicing permits on Lake Minnetonka. The Board has reviewed existing LMCD Code for deicing installations and changes are being considered to three areas. These include: 1) the area to be deiced and fencing requirements, 2) the March 15th "No Permit" date, and 3) deicing at permanent versus seasonal docks. Public input was received at the 6/22/05 Board meeting on proposed Code changes within these three areas. This input has been taken into consideration and a draft Code amendment will be considered at the 7/27/05 Board meeting. We will keep you up to date on this. 2005 Lake Minnetonka Water Patrol Proiect: For the fifth consecutive boating season, there is increased law enfomement presence on Lake Minnetonka by adding two additional full-time Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol deputies from mid May through mid October. Similar to the past two years, funding for this project has been 100 percent from Hennepin County. This added presence by the Sheriff's Water Patrol has improved both the quality of the experience and safety for boaters on Lake Minnetonka. -2259- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NEWSLETTER, 7115105, PAGE 2 2005 Lake Minnetonka Solar Li.qht BuOy Project: For a fourth consecutive boating season, a solar light buoy project has been implemented on Lake Minnetonka, Solar lights have been. mounted on top of red and green navigational buoys at a number of high traffic channels throughout Lake Minnetonka. Similar to the. past, these solar lightS have been purchased with "Save the Lakei' fundS~ This project has incrementally increased during these four years and feedback on the solar lights has been positive in the past. 2004 Lake Minnetonka Boat Density and User Attitude Surveys: Consistent with the Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka, Boat Density and User Attitude Surveys were conducted by ThomTech Design last summer. This fieldwork was collected and analyzed by ThomTech Design this past winter. A Report was prepared by .ThomTech and presented to the LMCD Board in April. We will forward a copy of this Report to each of the 14 LMCD member cities sometime in the near future. "Future 0f the Lake" Special'E~bnt: The LMCD and Crysta!-Pierz Marine will be coordinating a special event called "Future of the Lake" on Saturday, August 13th, in the moming at The Commons in Excelsior, This special event is geared towards the youththrough a vadety of activities that will educate~ inform, and entertain attendees. Planning has commenced on finaliZing these activities and addressing the: details associated with them, We encourage participation in this special event from the youth of the 14 LMCD member cities. We will keep you up to date on this. 2006 LMCD Budget: In May, staff prepared the draft 2006 LMCD Budget for review by the Board and the 14 member cities.. In accordance with Minnesota State Statute 103B.635, the Board must on or before July 1 of each year prepare and submit a detailed budget of the LMCD's need, for the next calendar year, to the governing body of each municipality in the LMCD with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each .municipality. The LMCD Board reviewed the draft 2006 LMCD Budget at its 5/25/05, 6/8/05, and 6/22/05 Regular Board Meetings, A meeting .with officials from the 14.member cities was coordinated in the LMCD,office on. Friday,. 6t5105., to recei~/e input and ~:°mmentS On the draft 2006 LMCD Budget, The Board adopted the 200.6 LMcD BUdget, With a 4.3% levy increase compared 'to the 2005 LMCD Budget, at its 6/22/05 Regular Meeting and forwarded a copy of it to the 14 member cities before the July 1st deadline. · Web Page: The LMCD's WebPage. address is: http:llwww.lmcd,org, -2260- Case 05-42 and 05-~/3 Minor Subdivision / Variance(s) lots 4539 Island View Drive Mound, MN July 26,2005 This proposed variance is directly north of the property off Timothy L. & Mary E. Johnson 4547 Island View Drive Mound, MN 55364 952.472.0967 952.472.5978fax tijohn~att.net Concerns of the Johnson's: That no fill being proposed would meet or exceed the existing lot line in any way. That drainage will be maintained at currem levels between the Johnson's property and the property adjoining to it's north. This will allow water to escape to the lake. The level of water sometimes rises into the Johnson's basemem level due to the enormous amount of water being shed from the home directly south of their property. If current levels of drainage were changed the Johnson's home would become the cemer ofa filtlnel where water would be directed at their home. T[~ Johnson's property is on the side of a hill. This proposed landfill would put the Johnson's house in a valley between two hills. The current mnoffofwater during heavy rain is behind the Johnson's home escaping to the lake on the north side of the property. Lot line as it prog toward the lake. ~Lot line passing by house to the lake on north ~id¢. line going on to the lake side, /////////////