Loading...
1999-08-10MINUTF~ - CITY COUNCIL- AuGUsT 10, 1999 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin 'County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, August 10, 1999, at 7:30 P.M., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Tho present were Mayor Pat Meisel, Councilmembers: Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, Leah Weycker. Absent and excused: Councilmember Andrea Ahrens. Also in attendance were City Attorney John Dean, Acting City Manager Fran Clark, Building Offici Jon Sutherland, Assistant City Planner Loren Gordon. The following interested citizens were also present: John and Kristin Beise, Suzanne Claywell, Steve Coddon, Ken Evans, Becky Glister, Lorrie Ham, Jill Hanson, Elizabeth Hanson, Dorothea Helmen, Terry and Rita Hughes, B. J. Johnson, is Mader, Jerry Mader, Bill Meyer, Geoff Michael, Jim Mune, Bruce Thompson, Frank Weiland, and Verna and Cklair Hasse. The Mayor opened the meeting at 7:31 P.M. and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. *Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. APPROVE AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA The Acting City Manager requested the addition of 3H, Resolution Authorizing Execution of the Grant Agreement and 31, Resolution Reaffirming Authorizing City Sponsorship of State Grant-in-Aid Snowmobile Trail Funds be added on the Consent Agenda. MOTION by Brown, second by Hanus, to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda as amended above. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. *CONSENT AGENDA *1.0 APPROVE MINUTES OF JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL MEETING- JULY 27. ! 1999 & MOUND REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MINUTES - JULY 27. 1999 MOTION Brown, Hanus, unanimously. *1.2 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR & ACTING CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNICATION COMMISSION (LMCC) FOR LOCAL PROGRAMMING FACILITIES, 596 '1.3 '1.4 *1.5 MOUND CITY COUNCIL.MINUIF~- AUGUST 10, 1999 RESOLUTION # 99-70 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT wrr~ ~A~ ~?ON~r~ COMMtn~CA~ION COMMISSION (nMCO gOR LOCAL pROGRAMMING FAC~. Brown, Hanus, unanimously. FINAL PAYMENT REOUF~T - 1999 SEAL COAT PROJECT - $27.951.88. MOTION Brown, Hanus, unanimously. PAYMENT REOUEST #3 - AUDITOR'S ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - $29.130.99. MOTION Brown, Hanus, unanimously. PAYMENT REQUF~T #3 - NORWOOD LANE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - $4.030.10. MOTION Brown, Hanus, unanimously. *1.6 PAYMENT OF BILLS, MOTION Brown, Hanus, unanimously. '1.7 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT AGREEMENT. RESOLUTION # 99-71 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT AGREEMENT. Brown, Hanus, unanimously. · 1.8 RF$OLIfFION REAFFIRMING.Alfl]tORIZING CITY SPONSORSHIP OF STATE GRANT-IN-AID SNOWMOBILE TRAIL FUNDS RESOLUTION # 99-72 RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING AUTHORIZING CITY SPONSORSHIP OF STATE GRANT-IN-AID SNOWMOBILE TRAIL FUNDS. Brown, Hanus, unanimously. 597 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 10, 1999 1.9 ¢OMMEW~ A SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT There were none. 1.10 PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE HALSTEAD PLACE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) TO CHANGE THE CURRENT USE OF AN R-1 MOBILE HOME PARK TO AN R-1 PDA AND R-3 PDA RES RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. LOCATED WITHIN THE R-1 SINGLE FAMIIN ZONING DISTRICT. LOTS 1.2. 3. HALSTEAD HEIGHTS, PI]) y22-117-24 43 0007. P ~ Z CASE #99-28. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF THE HALSTEAD PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED AND DETACHED HOME DEVELOPMENT LOCATED WITHIN THE R-1 $IN(~LE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT. LOTS 1.2. 3. HALSTEAD HEIGHTS. PID F22-117-24 43 0007. P & X CASE The City Planner presented the case. This is a redevelopment named Halstead Place which requires a rezoning and a preliminary plat for single family attached and detached homes. portions of the plat lie in both the City of Mound and the City of Minnetrista. The development is located on Bartlett Boulevard. The preliminary plat proposes two types of development. The upper portion is a combination of twin and 3-plex attached units and the lower level are detached single family lots. There are a total of 22 lots in the complete development. Overall the density is 3.9 units per acre and the Mound portion is 5.6 units per acre. There is a division between Mound property and Minnetrista. The Mound portion includes 8 lots that are attached and 1 lot that is detached by the lakeside. There are 9 lots within Mound and 8 of the lots need a variance which is being considered. Other planning issues are platting issues concerning outlots and the access easement which will be served with a private driveway. There needs to be a variance for the right-of-way and the cul-de-sac. The development project includes a bluff area with a 30-foot setback. This land currently is a trailer park. Landscaping will be added near Bartlett Boulevard. The City Planner stated there are drainage and grading issues involved in this development. The developer proposes that the slope will be more gradual near one location but at another location the slope would be 40 percent, which is 10 percent over code. The storm water pond is in the Minnetrista portion of the plat and they would have the ultimate control. 598 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 10, 1999 The City Planner referred to the rezoning issue. The parcel would go from an R-1 to R-3 development area which is needed to accommodate the twins and the triplexes. With rezoning there would be setbacks that need to be changed and also variances to accommodate the rezoning. The City Planner referred to the hardcover issue. The total for the Mound side would be 40.07 percent but the development as a whole was just shy of 30 percent. The project is sensitive to the hardeover issue, however, the way the development is platted, Mound is receiving more of the hardcover than Minnetrista. Brown stated he was not aware of the hardcover numbers at the Planning Commission meeting two weeks ago. The City Planner stated that the actual percent is 40 percent, and code allows 30 percent. The City Planner also reviewed the shoreline management provisions and how they apply to the project. He described how the density level of the development can be based on the different tiers, The Shoreline Ordinance states that a developer can swap density if needed. With a density transfer, Shoreline management would allow 46 lots on this parcel. With typical standards applied, 25 lots would be allowed. These numbers are deceiving because Minnetrista does not allow the density transfer in their Shoreland Management Ordinance and the lakeside lot 22 is not 20,000 square feet in size as would be required. Councilmember Hanus added with regard to the above figures, it really is irrelevant what shoreline management states regarding the density issue because they are including both Mound and Minnetrista property but, the Council is considering only the Mound property. The City Planner referred to the City Engineer's report who was not present tonight. The City Engineer stated in his report that there would need to be easements on the preliminary plat which was not noted before tonight. With regard to grading, if the project does get approved the bluff area should not be disturbed. There was a mention again of variances to street standards. Storm water and sanitary sewer are major issues in this project. The sanitary sewer flows down to Minnetrista and is pumped back to the sewage treatment plant by West Edge Boulevard. In order to have this project proceed, the City needs to come up with agreements regarding maintenance so we can utilize their pipes. In addition, the water main is an issue. A solution for the water concern would be to do some looping from Bartlett and then back up to Halstead. The City Engineer's report states with this scenario there would not be enough pressure for fire trucks with the six inch watermain that currently exists, but he is certain there would be enough pressure for residents basic water needs. The City Planner s ted that the City Engineer mentioned replacing the six inch with an eight inch pipe but this would only increase about one PSI in the total loop system in the development so this is basically no improvement. The City Planner lastly pointed out storm water issues from the City Engineer's report. The City Planner stated 'the location where the intakes are placed seem appropriate. He also stated there would not be a storm water pipe at the location. He stated Minnetrista should own and maintain the pond and Mound would have a portion of responsibility of maintaining the pond. There appears to be a number of governmental concerns that need to be worked out regarding storm water. 599 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES -'AUGUST 10, 1999 · The City Planner stated the Planning Commission approved the project has on staffs recommendations for approval based on 15 conditions as noted in previous minutes and it was a 4-3 vote. When the vote was passed there was not enough information regarding hardcover and residents had issues regarding ~density and, storm water concerns. The City Planner stated s ff is looking for a'concept approval based upon the above-noted information. Councilmember Brown stated he has noted other members of the Planning Commission have reconsidered after seeing other information come forward. Councilmember Hanus asked if there Would be a common drive for the three properties. The City Planner stated that is correct. Councilmember Brown referred to the R-1 property and the new houses. He stated one concern he sees is the sloping of about a six-foot drop. If a retaining wall n s to be added, what does that do to the variance from the property line. The City Planner stated the setback needs to be 30 feet and currently it is at 15 feet. The City Planner stat there does need to be some consideration regarding landscaping. Councilmember Hanus asked about grading. He suggested staying back 6 feet or so from the house, but that would make a 45-degree drop, at a minimum. He noted the water will flow quickly and that windows on the backside of house will be looking at a grass wall. Councilmember Weycker asked if Minnetrista is also required to do a rezoning. The City Planner stated the process that they are doing is not quite certain. This proposal does not meet Minnetrista's density requirements at the current time. Councilmember Weycker is concerned about spot zoning with this piece of property. Mayor Meisel also has concerns regarding spot zoning. Councilmember Weycker stated she has great concern with water issues and water problems. She stated the scenario of Mound having no control and Minnetrista having the control, could lead to a tremendous problem. Councilmember Hanus asked what findings or reasoning justifies the variances on a non lot of record? Gordon stated that if the project didn't include the Minnetrista land, it would be difficult to find reasons for hardship on the requested variances. Because of the variances noted, the City Planner stated staff would not recommend approval of the variances. It appears though that shoreline management states the density is not an issue. Councilmember Brown stated the Council can no longer look at this development as a complete project. The Council needs to consider only the Mound portion and as he sees it, it will be very dense and there will be a lot of hardcover. Also because Mound and Minnetrista have water issues which cannot be resolved to date, Councilmember Brown is concerned about this development. 600 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES.~' AUGUST 10,, 1999 Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:-22 P.M, M~,or Meisel gave instructions to the public regarding the hearing prbcess. Ken Evans, 6635 Bartlett Boulevard, stated that there'are too many variables in this plan as he sees it. He is concerned about what will happen with residents. The agreement he signed as a 'resident of the trailer park states a notice' of 9 months needs to be given to the residents and that timeframe and the developer's timeframe do not coincide. Mr. Evans also noted the relocation costs for him would be gmat and he would endure a financial burden if he had to move. Jerry Mader, 6607 Bartlett Boulevard, stated he 4ms a concern regarding the tri-plex location. He stated he has attended meetings previously and heard each unit would be priced in the $200,000 to $400,0000 range. He is concerned that no individual would pay that amount because there will be no great view from the windows. He also stated the lot sizes do not seem appropriate. Suzanne Claywell, Wilshire Boulevard, stated she is very concerned about the high density. Ms. Claywell stated a developer should not be allowed to jam this amount of density into the amount of property that is there. She also stated a great concern regarding the variances for hardcover. She stated that the City of Mound needs to be more concerned about building the community as a whole. She would like to be proud when she tells individuals that she is a resident of Mound. Bill Meyer, 6601 Bartlett Boulevard, stated he has lived in Mound for 20 years near to the trailer park and has never had a problem with trailer park. He was sure that maybe this is a better alternative than the trailer park but, only if there was not the zoning issue at hand. His great concern was turning this property into R-3 which now borders with Minnetrista and farmland. He feels the lots will be too small. This property is now an R-1 lot for the trailer park and he has a concern of having it changed for this specific development. Mr. Meyer also feels there would be a parking issue ,for all of the new residents on this site. He stated it appears that there would be no room to store or park' bigger items, except inside the garage. With setbacks that are required in this area, the garage size would also need to be reduced. Mr. Meyer stated the property, as he sees it, would be too dense. He stated the first moving van will destroy the park. He strongly opposed zoning this R-3. Cklair Hasse, 6627 Bartlett Boulevard, stated he lives directly east of this project. Mr. Hasse stated he is a member of the Planning Commission and when the project was first talked about, he liked it, but he wanted the developer to not have to rezone the property and acquire all the variances. Mr. Hasse stated he is definitely against the rezoning of the property from an R-1 to R-3. Terry Hughes, 6641 Halstead Avenue, stated he lives adjacent to proposed R-1 and is concerned about the storm water and drainage pipe. He noted that Mound is being asked to take all the responsibility for the water. Since that is the case, there will be maintenance issues in the future and overflowing issues that the City of Mound will have to deal with in the future if this project is developed. 601 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTE8 - AUGUST 10, 1999 B. J. Johnson, 6655 Halstead Avenue, strongly urged a denial of this redevelopment. He stated he has spoken before at other Planning Commission meetings regarding this project. _ . . ~5~i- Dorothea I-Ielmen, 6669 I-Ialstead Avenue, Stated she has attended other Planning Commission meetings in the past. She lives downstream from the development being proposed and is very concerned about the water that comes from the pipe when the 'big flood' will occur. She 'stated she is a Mound citizen at the.mercy of Minnetrista since they have ownership of the storm water holding pond. Geoff Michael, 1713 Avocet Lane, stated he comes before the Council as Chair of the Planning Commission. He stated has chaired three meetings regarding this development project--one was a joint meeting held at Minnetrista and there were two others he chaired in Mound's Council chambers. He stated he had a momentary lapse of judgment regarding this development. He encouraged the Planning Commission to at least move the project on for City Council review. After reviewing the project more thoroughly, he stated that with variances, the rezoning, the high densil:y issues, even though his vote is on record as having voted 'yes" for this project, he would today vote no", if he had it to do over. Mr. Michael stated it does not make sense to rezone the property as it exists today. Frank Weiland, 6045 Aspen Road, stated he comes before the Council today as a Planning Commissioner and a citizen. Mr. Weiland noted after the information he has received from tonight's meeting and how the information that keeps being introduced changes the whole project, if it were possible to revote, his vote would be "no." Mayor Meisel dosed the public hearing at 9:30 P.M. Councilmember Brown stated he would like to read Mr. Orr Bum's statement, who is also a member of the Planning Commission. Mr. Burma states the following in his letter: "I regret that a conflict of schedules makes it/~ecessary to write this letter rather than attend the Council meeting tonight. Please accept this input into your deliberations on the subject. This letter is in regards to my vote on the Planning Commission regarding the trailer park redevelopment case. I was the second to the motion to pass the item to the City Council with recommendations for approval. I have since had serious reservations. The reservations are density and spot zoning. Because of these and other considerations of somewhat lesser concern, if the vote were taken today, I would vote for denial of the proposal as presented." Councilmember Brown stated that he was the 4th vote on the Planning Commission regarding this proposal. He stated that at the time he made a good faith effort to see this project through but now he has serious reservation regarding the density and spot zoning and because of these considerations, if the vote was taken today he would vote "no" and deny the project. Michael Gair addressed the Council regarding his client, Ed Forliti. He stated he is stunned reg ding the Planning Commission's votes that were stated tonight. Mr. Gair stated he still supports his applicant, Remington Development, for the consideration of the development. 602 MOUND CITF COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 10, 1999 Mr. Gair stated~even though this it a multi-jurisdic.tional development, this project is possible as long as there is communication amongst all of those .involved in the project. He stated the redevelopment they are proposing consists of 5.6? acres, which would include 29~ new homes. Mr. Gair stated the site is a redevelopment and these types of projects require mutual commitment. Mr. Gair admitted these types of projects are expensive and complicated. This project started with two neighborhood meetings and evolved to twin- family home sites and single-family with attached garages according to what the people wanted. To date, there have been several staff meetings with both cities. Remington has met with the Planning Commission and the project was reviewed. They have met with the County highway department on site regarding the Highway 110 concern. The possibility of a corporate boundary change was discussed previously which was not feasible and then Remington eliminated an attached unit reducing from 16 down to 15 for density reasons. Mr. Gair stated the total number of lots would be 22, which is three l~ss than previously proposed. He indicated that according to planning staff, this development meets the shoreline management ordinance and the storm water plan. He stated the water supply is being resolved. He stated he felt confident that the water supply from Mound and from Minnetrista will fit with the timing for the development of the project. Mr. Galr stated the storm water planning mitigates the concerns of residents. The water currently comes from the ,north and drops south through some ditches and culverts and drains without an easement from private property down to the lake. This meets the requirements to be further refined, but currently it does work at this point. Mr. Gair stated the road improvements will include newly constructed roadways including an appropriate turnaround on the road to service the utility vehicles. There will also be a tax revenue increase as a result of this plan. He restated this would be a fine place to live and own a home. The site development will be completed in a single phase and home occupancy could begin in Mound in late winter/spring of the year 2000 Mr. Gair then addressed the issue of grading. He stated the homes that back up to the east boundary near the retaining wall by Highway 110 would have some nice landscaping made available by having a raised grade with a walkout. Mr. Gair addressed the storm water ponding in the southwest comer. Mr. Gair stated the lowest portion of the pond rises up and then drops down to Halstead. An elongate on the basin could be a solution and then shrubs could be planted along the edge. This will provide screening around the ponding, area. Mr. Gair referred to the City Engineer's reports. He stated the developer will place a conservation easement to protect the bluff and the slopes which was a concern in the report. Mr. Gair mentioned the County approval is not quite completed but is almost to the point of general support for this type of roadway to get a permit. Mr. Gair addressed the hardcover issue and explained the calculation does include the upper drives, parking area, and the finger of asphalt which was a concern of Councilmember Brown. 603 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTE8- AUGUST 10, 1999 Mr. Gair stated that the variances are not unusual. R-3 is what is required, and this does not create an overly dense situation. He is confident in the PUD and the preliminary plat to date. He also stated he supports the project ~ feels it would be a great place to live and a source of pride. Councilmember Brown stated he has a problem with granting a 40 percent hardcover variance because it would be setting precedent, so the Council would have to grant a 40 percent hardcover for other developers who come in and want to do exactly what Remington is proposing, is He foresees this as a problem that Mound should not have to encounter. Mayor Meisel stated that this is a public hearing and she would like to move forward with the rezoning issue at hand. The City Attorney stated that Mayor Meisel is correct in wanting, to discuss the rezoning part of this Project and if it is passed by the Council, the PDA issue can be considered and voted on. Mr. Gair stated the issues with hardcover and surface water runoff is discussed in shoreline management and shoreline management states the hardcover is appropriate. Councilmember Hanus wanted to know who the target owners .are for this site. Mr. Gair reviewed two markets. He stated there would be opportunity for an empty nester or retired person to live comfortably in the single-family homes. There of course would not be an age restriction and the developer would not prohibit young families. Councilmember Hanus asked what the price range for these homes would be? Mr. Forliti stated the price for the twins would range from $175,000 to $275,000. The single-family homes would range from $250,000 and up. Mr. Forliti stated'there would be more hardcover in Mound after the homes are developed. Mr. Forliti assured the Council that the hardcover will go down in Mound and the water will be controlled. There was some discussion regarding the change in Mound and Minnetrista's corporate boundary. This process is fairly easy according to Mr. Gair, but the possibility of this occurring at this point in the project would not be something to put much concentration on. Evidently it was related to the Council previously and it was not something the City of Mound was interested in pursuing. - Discussion Mayor Meisel stated she would like comments regarding the rezoning issue at hand. The City Attorney stated the redevelopment is considered two-part. The underlining rezoning district is one part and the second part is the preliminary plat. The City Attorney stated that if the rezoning does not get approved then the preliminary plat, at this point, would not even need to be considered. Councilmember Hanus asked if an appropriate finding for denial would be based on the development proposal that was presented? The City Attorney stated it could be or based on the type of intensity in that type of district and zoning charactefistcs of the surrounding property. 604 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 10, 1999 Councilmember Hanu, s. stated he would like to see the,trailer park area cleaned up and redeveloped. He noted Mound has been hoping for something to come along for a long time. At this point, though, Councilmember Hanus does not agree with this specific Project. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Meisel to direct staff to review the statements and testimony received to draft a resolution of denial for the Conditional Use Permit to Allow for the Halstead Place .Planned Development Area to change the current use of an R-1 Mobile Home Park to an R-1 PDA and R-3. PDA Residential Development located in the R-1 Single Family Zoning District. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carded. The City Attorney suggested a denial resolution be considered at the August 24th meeting. 1.11 RF-qOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER A ASSIGNMENT OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE TO MEDIACOM LLC. The Acting City Manager referred to the Agreement and stated that Exhibit D was inadvertently omitted which requires Mediacom LLC to provide a Corporate Guaranty as recommended. The replacement pages should be included with the resolution previously handed out before tonight's meeting. The Acting City Manager also stated the conditions of the recently approved Franchise Agreement will apply to the new owners as well. Hanus moved and Brown seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION/D9-73 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER AND ASSIGNMENT OF THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE TO MEDIACOM LLC. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.12 DISCUSSION ON CITY MANAGER REPLACEMENT. Mayor Meisel referred to the City Manager consultant packets that were handed out at the Committee of the Whole Meeting. She stated she did receive a packet also from the search firm Chanhassen used to hire their City Manager which she presented tonight as well. Mayor Meisel stated she would like to call the search groups which are favored the most tonight to set up interviews. Councilmember Brown voted for Oldani as his first pick Slavin as his second; Councilmember Weycker voted for Mercer as her first choice and Ralph Anderson as her second. Weycker felt Sathe (the Chanhassen referral) was expensive. Hanus voted for Mercer as his first choice and Saathe as his second; Mayor Meisel voted for Oldani as her first choice and Sathe as her second .choice. Mayor Meisel. commented that the City Manager at Chanhassen raved about the Sathe firm because they located him and he is very pleased working in' Chanhassen. 605 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST 10, 1999 Councilmember Brown requested the Council interview Mercer, Oldani and Sathe (who is local) according to the vo~g above stated. Councilmember Hanus reiterated that the initial interview for all of the search companies is at the expense of the interviewee not the City of Mound. Mayor Meisel stated when interviewing, the Councilmembers should have five or six questions to score that would be most important to that member. Also, Mayor Meisel will find a common day with all of those participating in the interviews and for all three search groups, and thank those that sent in packets for participating. Mayor Meisel will work on setting up a date and time for interviewing the search finns, Mercer, Sathe. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS 1. July Finance Department Report as prepared by Gino Businaro, Finance Director. Notice from Sugar & Spice of a filming at Shirley Hills Primary School, on August 23 & 24, 1999. o Letter from Hennepin County regarding the County Road 15 realignment. Mayor Meisel and the Assisting City Manager stated some concern regarding the additional costs that would be incurred if the County Road 15 realignment project were moved up on Hennepin County's schedule. Memo to Assisting City Manager from Bruce Chamberlain regarding post office relocation. Councilmember Brown commented that the streamlining of the variance procedure that the Planning Commission is enforcing. He foresees this to be a great assistance now and in the future to the City of Mound. MOTION made by Brown, seconded by Weycker to adjourn at 10:06 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Francene C. Clark, Acting City Manager Attest: Council Secretary 6O6 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES- AUGUST I0, 1999 THIS pAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLy, 607 BILLS August 10, 1999 Batch 9071 188,014.45 Batch 9072 165,959.05 TOTAL BILLS 353,973.50