Loading...
1997-02-11II II I J Ii &l, ,I,, ,J ,I, Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 11, 1997 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, February 11, 1997, at 7:30 PM, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Mark Hanus, Liz Jensen and Leah Weycker. Also in attendance were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, City Attorney John Dean, Building Official Jon Sutherland, Police Chief Len Harrell, Park Director Jim Fackler, Public Works Supt. Greg Skinner and City Clerk Fran Clark and the following interest persons: Ken Junker, Steve Bedell, Jim Bedell, Shirley Hatcher, Debra and Randy Bilger, Mark Reschke, and Jim Renny. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. *Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, 1.0 APPROVE AGENDA. At this time items can be added to the Agenda that are not listed and/or items can be removed from the Consent Agenda and voted upon after the Consent Agenda has been approved. The City Manager asked that the following items be added to the Agenda: Consent Agenda - Add set a bid opening date for the 50 H.P. tractor and flail mower, February 26, 1997. Regular Agenda - Add information on the LMCD Public Hearing regarding the Lost Lake Channel. MOTION made by Hanus, seconded by Ahrens to approve the Agenda and the Consent Agenda as amended above. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. *CONSENT AGENDA: *1.1 APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 28, 1997, REGULAR MEETING. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. *1.2 '1.3 '1.4 '1.5 Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 RESCHEDULE MARCH 11, 1997 REGULAR MEETING TO TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 1997. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. REQUEST FROM MINNETONKA CLASSIC BASS CLUB TO HOLD TOURNAMENT WEIGH-IN, JUNE 7, 1997, AT MOUND BAY PARK. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. APPOINTMENT OF WEED INSPECTOR FOR 1997. RESOLUTION//97-16 RESOLUTION TO APPOINT JIM FACKLER, WEED INSPECTOR FOR 1997 Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY'S FIRST TIME HOMEBUYERS MORTGAGE PROGRAM THROUGH THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY'S MINNESOTA CITIES PARTICIPATION PROGRAM. '1.6 RESOLUTION//97-17 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PARTICIPATION IN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY HRA APPLICATION FOR MHFA MINNESOTA CITIES MORTGAGE PROGRAM Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY'S HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM THROUGH THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY. '1.7 RESOLUTION g97-18 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PARTICIPATION IN THE HENNEPIN COUNTY HRA HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAMS Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 350:640 TO ADD "SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES" AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE R-1 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT MARCH 4, 1997. MOTION 91 Minutes - Moumt City Council - February 11, 1997 Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. '1.8 SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW EXPANSION OF A PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ADD ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES LOCATED WITHIN THE R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AT 2450 WILSHIRE BLVD., SHIRLEY HILDq ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MARCH 4, 1997. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. *1.9 SET PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND RELATED VARIANCES FOR THE "SETON BLUFF" RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. *1.10 *1.11 '1.12 MARCH 4, 1997. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. LICENSE RENEWALS. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. PAYMENT OF BILLS. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. SET DATE FOR BID OPENING FOR 50 H.P. TRACTOR AND FLAIL MOWER - 1.13 FEBRUARY 26, 1997, AT 11:00 A.M. MOTION Hanus, Ahrens, unanimous. PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE TO ALLOW A "MAJOR AUTO REPAIR" BUSINESS AS REQUESTED BY RANDY'S AUTOMOTIVE. The Building Official explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval with certain conditions. Councilmember Hanus questioned the second sentence in the third Whereas of the proposed resolution which reads as follows: "The permit allows minor auto repair, tire repair, valve jobs, service maintenance, gas welding and an open sales lot limited to 10 vehicles, 7 of which must be stored outside of the fence." The Council discussed the sentence. The City Attorney suggested deleting that sentence from the proposed resolution. The Council agreed. 92 Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 The applicant, Randy Bilger, stated that he will be cleaning up the site and will keep it clean. The Mayor Ol nM tho public h rin , no eornrn tat . The Mayor elo ecl the pugl'~c hearing. Jensen moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION g97-19 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A "MAJOR REPAIR BUSINESS" FOR RANDY'S AUTOMOTIVE LOCATED IN THE B-2 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AT 4831 SHORELINE DRIVE, LOTS 1 TO 4 INCL. & LOTS 20 & 21 .... , BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT A, PID//13-117-24 44 0014, P & Z CASE//97-01 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.14 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE UNIMPROVED OXFORD LANE LOCATED NORTH OF HANOVER ROAD AND SOUTH OF ABERDEEN ROAD BETWEEN BLOCKS 5 & 9 IN DEVON. The Building Official explained the request. He stated that the Planning Commission recommended denial, but since then the City Engineer has revised his report due to obtaining additional information and his February 11, 197 memorandum was distributed to the Council. The Planning Commission did not have this memo when the vacation was considered. The Mayor opened the public hearing. KEN JUNKER, 4776 Island View Drive - asked who would get this property if it were vacated? He had no objection to the vacation. The City Attorney explained that normally half went to each abutting property owner. JIM RENNY, 2008 Thorndale Ave., New Brighton - owner of Lots 14-20 on Hanover Lane. He also spoke for his mother who owns Lots 1-6 on Aberdeen. He had no objection to the vacation as long as his property and his mothers continue to have access to their property after the vacation. The Building Official explained that the City Engineer has addressed this in his February 11, 1997 memo. It would be more feasible to extend Hanover Road west to Devon Lane, if Mr. Renny's property were to be developed. The watermain is already in place in Hanover Road and the sanitary sewer could be extended from an existing manhole in Devon Lane to serve this property. The Public Works Supt. explained that if Mr. Renny wanted to develop the property he could extend Hanover from where it ends at Oxford Lane. The Council discussed the fact that the Planning Commission has not reviewed the additional information and felt they should review this vacation request again. MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Weycker to continue this public hearing to March 4, 1997, and refer the item back to the Planning Commission with the new information about the utilities and asking for their recommendations. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 93 Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 1.15 COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. The Mayor asked if there were any comments or suggestions from citizens present. STEVE BEDELL, 4801 Shoreline Drive - stated that on January 14, 1997, he appeared before the Council requesting a 3.2 Beer License which was approved by a 4-1 vote. There were some questions that he thought were cleared up. He stated he was under the impression that he had met the qualifications for the License. After that meeting he started buying thousands of dollars in equipment for storage of the beer. He then stated that at the January 21st COW Meeting there was discussion concerning more legalities on the qualifications for the 3.2 Beer License. Following that meeting Mr. Be. dell received a letter dated January 31, 1997, alerting him to the questions. He stated he still does not know if he has the license or not. He then submitted a petition signed by 17 people stating that they did not object to the sale of 3.2 beer at his business. He asked if there was any new information on this matter or how to proceed with obtaining his license. The City Attorney stated that Section 810:30, Subdivision 3, Subsection (b) requires that the applicant receive written consent of at least a majority of the property owners within 500 feet of the subject property. Apparently that provision was not complied with when the application was received. It was overlooked when the City Council considered and approved this on January 14, 1997. In the City Attorney's opinion this provision of the ordinance is unenforceable and should not be used as a basis in consideration of 3.2 Beer License applications. The Council decided to let the approval of the license stand. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to direct staff to correct the language in Section 800:30, Subdivision 3 of the City Code. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.16 1996 DEPARTMENT HEADS ANNUAL REPORTS The following Department Heads presented their 1996 annual reports to the City Council: Jim Fackler, Parks Director; Greg Skinner, Public Works Superintendent; and Len Harrell, Police Chief. 1.17 REQUEST FROM TONKA BAY MARINA (NEW OWNER OF TEAL POINTE) TO RELEASE LETTER OF CREDIT ON TEAL POINTE DEVELOPMENT. The City Manager explained the request. The City Engineer and the City Attorney recommend the following: Release all but $15,930.00 of the remaining amount under the Letter of Credit. This amount will cover the remaining work that is to be completed by Widmer this spring. Gabriel Jabbour, as owner of the Teal Pointe property must send a letter to Marquette Bank Mound requesting that the Letter of Credit be released based upon the fact that the Letter of Credit, with the exception of $15,930.00 is no longer needed. 94 II .11 ~inu~¢,~ - Mou~l ~ty Council - February 11, 1997 Gabriel Jabbour, as owner of the Teal Pointe property, must send a letter to the City of Mounrl dlrected to ~xlward I. ghukle, Jr., lEity Manager, that he is requesting that the Letter of Credit be released pursuant to//2 above. Ahrens moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #97-20 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PARTIAL RELEASE OF THE LETTER OF CREDIT FOR THE TEAL POINTE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carded. 1.18 REOUEST FROM WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO USE CITY COUNCIl, CHAMBERS FOR REGULAR SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS TWICE PER MONTH ON A REGULAR BASIS BEGINNING JULY 1, 1997. The City Manager explained that the School Board is asking to use the Council Chambers for their School Board Meetings starting July 1, 1997. This would be a permanent arrangement. The Council discussed the fact that the School Board would have to reschedule their meetings because they meet on the same night as the Planning Commission. The Council discussed the following issues regarding the permanent use of the Council Chamber: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. security issues; is there need for a staff member to be present to open and lock the building; conflict with City use; extra wear and tear on the building, furnishings, and equipment; janitorial services; and utilities; insurance; and what happens if something breaks. The Council asked the Staff to address the issues and concerns and how it would relate to long term use. They stated they are not against the concept of letting the School Board use the building. This will be brought back to the Council at a later date after more information is gathered. 1.19 PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AMENDING SECTIONS 255:05 AND 255:15 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 256 TO THE CITY CODE ESTABLISHING A DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION. The City Manager gave the background of this item. This proposal was brought up by Councilmember Hanus at the first meeting in January and was referred to Staff to prepare the appropriate ordinance amendments. The City Attorney prepared the draft of an ordinance amendment. The City Attorney reviewed the proposed ordinance for the Council. He stated that the revised draft is marked as such with the changes that were suggested. The changes were as follows: 1. Reduce the number of members of the POSC to 6 with 5 to be appointed by the City Council and one Council liaison. 2. Getting rid of some of the old language regarding start up and phasing in membership. 3. Section 255:15. The allocation of the responsibilities between the two commissions, POSC and the Dock & Commons Advisory Commission. 95 Minutes - Mound City Council - February I1, 1997 ge Adding section 256:00 creating the companion commission, the Dock and Commons Advisory Commission. This was to implement the recommendations that were considered and approved by the Council at the first meeting in January. This would be a six member commission, 5 members to be appointed by the City Council and a Council liaison. Staging in the initial terms of this commission, all being appointed immediately, but staggering the length of terms of the commissioners. The initial appointments shall to the greatest extent possible be made from members of the Commons Dock Task Force. An appointee shall be automatically removed from the Commission if they cease to be active in the City's licensed dock program. This is consistent with the provision that in order to be appointed, they have to be active in the city's dock program. Much of the language is the same as the existing Park & Open Space Advisory Commission Ordinance. The Council discussed having an even number of members on the proposed commission, including the Council liaison. The remainder of commissions all have odd numbers to avoid tie votes. Councilmember Jensen stated that she feels both these commissions should have odd numbers on them. The Council then discussed the fact that other ordinances may need to be amended if they deal with docks because they may refer things to the POSC and will need to be referred to the new commission. The City Attorney suggested putting in another section which would be like a revisor's note indicating that if, in any other ordinance in the code, a reference is made to a duty of the POSC which has now been assigned to the Dock and Commons Advisory Commission, it shall be understood that those duties are changed as a result of this ordinance. Councilmember Jensen questioned the duties being the same in the POSC and the Dock & Commons Commission. She stated this has a potential for overlap. Councilmember Hanus stated that those are not issues to be dealt with, it is a public policy that has been published. Councilmember Jensen stated she finds it confusing because it is in the section under their Duties. The City Attorney suggested the following wording be added: "Whenever the term Park & Open Space Advisory Commission (POSC) is used in this code of ordinances with respect to a duty to be assigned to the Dock and Commons Advisory Commission, it shall be understood that the use of the term Park & Open Space Advisory Commission relates to the Dock & Commons Advisory Commission." This will not appear in the Code Book. It will not appear anywhere, except as a direction to the City Clerk. Councilmember Weycker expressed concern over the phrase "public shoreline" in the proposed ordinance. She asked if this includes the dedicated commons? Councilmember Hanus stated that if there are city licensed docks there, it should apply. The City Attorney stated that was done so you would read the two concepts together, public shoreline which is subject to city docks, so if it is a publicly dedicated shoreline, which is part of the dock program, then it would come within the purview of this ordinance. If it was privately dedicated commons, it would not. Nor would it come within the purview of the ordinance if it were, for example, Canary Beach, which is a public shoreline but it's not within the dock program. Commons that are dedicated to the neighborhoods and not public dedications would not be within this ordinance. The City Attorney suggested removing the word "public" from the 96 I II Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 two places in the ordinance it appears. The Council agreed. Couneilmember Weyeker stated she has a problem with the whole ordinance. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Weycker to amend the proposed ordinance Section 255:05 to read as follows: "Composition. The Park and Open Space Advisory Commission shah consist of seven members. Six members shall be appointed by the City Council. Section 256:05 to read as follows: "Composition. The Dock & Commons Advisory Commission shall consist of six members._ Seven members (to be composed of four inland and three abutting property owners." The vote was 2 in favor with Ahrens, Hanus and Polston voting nay. Motion fails 3-2. Hanus moved and Ahrens seconded the following ordinance amendment as proposed and amended by the City Attorney: ORDINANCE #84-1997 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 255:05 AND 255:15 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO PARK AND OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION AND ADDED SECTION 256:00 TO THE CITY CODE ESTABLISHING A DOCK AND COMMONS ADVISORY COMMISSION Councilmember Weycker stated - She would not vote for this restructuring for the following reasons: 1. "When the Commons Task Force was established, Councilmember Jensen raised concerns about the biased make-up of the Commons Task Force and the skewed nature of their possible recommendations. At the same March 20, 1995, meeting, Mayor Polston and Councilmember Hanus both assured her that the Commons Task Force would take its recommendations to the POSC and Mayor Polston also suggested a public hearing at the Council level or arranging public forums. All, I believe, were intended to assure that public input to ideas brought up by a select group. But, here we are trying to make this task force a permanent body without the public or the POSC input. "Mr. Hanus' proposal states one of the conditions to be past irritations with the POSC. The Park Commission continually voiced concerns over the uncertainty of duties between them and the Commons Task Force. They went as far as passing a resolution, August 8, 1996, demanding that the City Council clarify their duties or abolish the Task Force. They also showed up at the August 20, 1996, Committee of the Whole Meeting, raising concerns about lack of communication with their Council Representative, Andrea Ahrens. The Council Minutes show that there was, 'No consensus on what to do with these concerns and the Council then moved on to the next item on the Agenda.' The record clearly shows that the POSC was given no answers to their questions. In fact, they were wasting their time on public land permits because they were told if they denied the permit and the applicant contested that denial, the permit would be temporarily granted anyway, pending the Commons Task Force recommendations. The Park Commission volunteers did not deserve this lack of respect." "I do not wish to diminish all the work the Commons Task Force did. I agree with most of the concepts they came up with. The Parks Commission also agreed with them and had minor changes after hearing and discussing part of the recommendations. They were 97 Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 still addressing the section on encroachments. That presentation of proposed changes, a month or so ago, was the first to be presented to the Parks Commission since the Commons Task Force was formed in March of 1995, almost two years ago. The City Council continues to say it always intended the Task Force to report their ideas, first, to the POSC. But reporting to the POSC, does not make any group inferior. It just follows procedure and ordinances that are currently on our books." "I find that the make-up of the POSC, as it is, represents Mound's public. Two of the current members, who also use the commons dock program, have 20 years of combined knowledge and experience in dealing with these issues as well as other park issues. Three of the POSC are also members of the Commons Task Force and three of the members also participate in the commons dock program." In January three people applied for a single advertised open seat. The POSC is not as out of touch as Mr. Hanus' proposal makes it out to be. It was the City Council who had the opportunity to implement ideas from a mediation group in my neighborhood of Woodland Point. After ten weeks of mediation meetings, the Council chose not to adopt the mediation agreement of the neighborhood group, but rather a page of demands from the six people that sued them. The action by the POSC was never involved or resulted in any loss of commons in my neighborhood. Mr. Hanus' proposal does not accuse the POSC of this perse, but he thinks that his proposed restructuring could have prevented this." "I would like to see the Commons Task Force stay a task force. I agree with Mr. Hanus that we should have a sounding board to hear complaints and ideas from dock program users. That was the reason the task force was formed. It should then report to the POSC made up of a publicly diverse group and then to the City Council. In Mr. Hanus' letter to the editor, dated March 31, 1996, he says exactly this. To quote, 'This is the way it was set up. This is how it is now and this is how it should be. No one is bypassed and everyone has ample opportunity for comment and debate.'" "I strongly urge this Council to vote against this proposal and follow through on the fair input you told the public you were creating." The vote on the proposed ordinance was 3 in favor with Jensen and Weycker voting nay. Motion carried on 3-2 vote. The Council is still expecting a recommendation from the POSC on the encroachment policy. The following letter from Tom Casey, Chair, Park & Open Space Commission, was entered into the public record: "Mound City Council c/o Ed Shukle RE: Revision of Park Commission Ordinance - 2/11/97 agenda Dear Mr. Shukle, 98 I Il I Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 Please read the following comments orally into the public record tonight and include this letter as part of the written pulolle record. For the following reasons, I wish to go on record in opposition to the Hanus proposal to amend the Park and Open Space Commission ordinance. This is a transparent attempt to remove a political opponent, Mr. Bill Darling, from the Park Commission by not having any vacant seats for his reappointment; This is a transparent attempt to "stack the deck" of the Dock and Commons Commission with people who share the commons philosophy of Mr. Hanus, Mrs. Ahrens and Mr. Poston; o The reduction of Park Commission membership from eight to five members will create the potential for 3-3 deadlocks (when the vote of the city council liaison is included); The reduction of Park Commission membership from eight to five members also diminishes the opportunity for citizens to participate in local government (including the 3 applicants who interviewed for a vacancy on 1/9/97); The Park Commission presently has decades of collective experience on commons/dock issues (2 present members have almost 20 years of experience); o The Park Commission has spent considerable time reviewing proposed encroachment policies, a wasted effort if the commons issues where removed from its duties; and 7. Mr. Hanus, in his 8/31/96 letter to The Laker, stated," ..... The procedure adopted by the city council is that the first place a task force policy recommendation goes is to the Parks and Open Space Commission for review. Then it is forwarded to the council. This is the way it was set up, this is how it is now, and this is how it should be. No one is bypassed and everyone has ample opportunity for comment, debate, and opinion." In summary, the City Council has no justification for changing the present structure. Constructive debate and citizen participation will be the victims. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, (signed) Tom Casey, Chair, Park and Open Space Commission" The Council asked that the Task Force members be contacted to see if they wish to serve on this new Dock and Commons Commission. If the new commission is not filled out by task force members, then it will be opened up anyone to apply. The Council would like to have the task force members decisions before the next City Council Meeting, February 25, 1997. 99 Minutes - Mound City Council - February 11, 1997 1.20 INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS:. A. Department Head Monthly Reports for January 1997. B. LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for January 1997. C. LMCD Mailings. D. Invitation from LMCD to attend the annual "Save the Lake" Banquet on February 13, 1997, at Lord Fletchers. Please advise if you wish to attend. E. Information from the League of Minnesota Cities re: Minnesota Court of Appeals decision on the rights of way issue in the US West/City of Redwood Falls case. F. REMINDER: Committee of the Whole Meeting, February 18, 1997, 7:30 P.M. G. REMINDER: City Offices will be closed on Monday, February 17, 1997, in observance of President's Day. ADD-ON INFORMATION ITEM: LMCD PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE LOST LAKE CHANNEL DOCKS The City Manager presented the Council with the public hearing notice from the LMCD regarding the Lost Lake Channel dock proposal. He told the Council that the application is for 16 transient slips in the turn around area of the proposed canal dredge. Included was the application and staff report. The staff is recommending approval. The board representative from the City of Mound is also in support of this. He expressed concern that there may be some opposition to this at the public heating and encouraged the Council to attend this meeting on March 12, 1997, at 7:00 P.M. in the Tonka Bay City Hall. MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Hanus at 9:25 P.M. to continue this meeting to Wednesday, February 12, 1997, at 7:00 P.M. at the Tonka Bay City Hall in conjunction with the LMCD Public Hearing regarding the Lost Lake Channel. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ~ard-J. S~Ulffe, .3r,, Ci~yManager~ Attest: City Clerk 100 BILLS February 11, 1997 BATCH 7013 $593,355.02 BATCH 7014 185,580.57 Total Bills $778,935.59