Loading...
1999-07-13Mound HRR Meeting July 13, 1999 Page 1 • MOUND HRA MEETING July 13,1999 The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in a regular session on Tuesday, July 13, 1999, at 6:00 PM, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Council members Andrea Ahrens, Bob Brown, Mazk Hams, and Leah Weycker; Acting City Manager Fran Clark; HRA Director Pinky Chazon; Financial Director Gino Businazo; Assistant City Planner Bruce Chamberlain, Building Official Jon Sutherland; City Attorney John Dean; Tenant Representative Pauline Payne; and Secretary Deb Hawkinson. Also present Planning Commission members Geoff Michael, Bill Voss, Frank Weiland, Cklair Hasse, and Michael Mueller. Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. DISCUSSION WITH SID INMAN Draft schedule and Tune Lines and Tasks • Sid Inman from Ehlers and Associates, Inc. outlined a time line based on a public hearing date of September 14, 1999. However, he pointed out, this date may have to be pushed out to meet other needs. The City Council has to define the boundaries and determine the qualifications they want for the TIF District. When asked by Hams why the date continued to be pushed out, Inman responded that additional time might be needed due to the sale of the school property to other parties. The only urgency would be if the purchaser of the school property began demolition. Clazk indicated they were to begin demolition on July 15, 1999. Inman then stated that the city needed to prepaze a resolution to qualify the use of the value prior to demolition to use in the criteria for establishing a TIF district that 51 % percentage of the property be substandard. This property would qualify today, but if demolished, may not count. Weycker understood the demolition to begin on July 15`~ was only the interior of the building. Sutherland pointed out that while a permit to demolish has been tendered, it has not been issued yet. Inman stated that a resolution was needed to memorialize the value. Dean asked if it was needed tonight. Inman stated it was needed tonight. Inman went on to discuss the policies the city may want to adopt for TIF districts. He gave the HRA members a sample copy to review. This sample included all the different statements and policies that had been used by cities using Ehlers and Associates, Inc., so it could just be adopted, or different ideas taken • from it. He pointed out that the important section was Section 3.01 and Section 5.03 and advised that a document should be in hand prior to the public hearing. In most instances, the cities require that the developer "prove" why they need TIF. He suggested that Mound also use this policy. Mound HRA Meeting July 13,1999 Page 2 Brown asked if an individual could use TIF monies. Mr. Inman stated they could, in fact, anyone in the district can request TIF monies. Mr. Inman cautioned that it could get expensive to be reviewing different alternatives from developers for TIF monies and suggested that an application fee to cover administrative costs may be appropriate. This quickly determines how serious the applicant really is. The last page of the handout covered administrative, staff and other consultant fees to be considered in this fee. A lot of this time and fee is recouped with the first established TIF district but should be addressed with a policy. These policies usually aze under the HRA authority. Meisel asked that this be put on the August 3, 1999 agenda. Inman discussed how to determine the size of the project azea and the TIF District. He stated that the laws regarding pooling outside the actual TIF district into the project area need consideration. Up to 25% of the TIF monies can be spent outside the TIF District in the project area. For that reason, consideration needs to be carefully given in defining the azea size. This may be a good reason for making a district lazger. However, care needs to be taken not to include azeas that will not have improvements until several years out. Chamberlain suggested that the azeas need to meet the "but for... "test according to TIF regulations. He outlined an azea suggested by staff. Hanus suggested that the area extend further south along Commerce Boulevard. Brown further suggested that the azea extends all the way down to Bartlett Boulevard along Commerce and be on both sides. Meisel suggested that certain properties by pulled out, however, to meet the 51 % substandazd rating. These would include: Our Lady of the Lake Church and Westonka Estates. Chamberlain stated that each property would be individually appraised and that there is a cost per property for appraisals. Thus, the lazger it gets, the more up front costs required. Inman stated that typically a bid goes out to bid the properties and that would cost a few thousand dollars per unit. Weycker suggested that since there was the pooling limitation, they might want to consider a smaller district and creating a second district. Meisel pointed out that there were start up costs associated with starting each district, so this needed to be balanced. Ahrens asked if they expanded down along Commerce, could street improvements be considered in the funding. Chamberlain stated that they could also do "street-soaping." Weycker asked how the city would recoup those start up costs. Inman stated that up to 10% of the TIF monies can be spent on administrative costs that are used in establishing the district. She further asked Inman to outline the negatives of TIF for Mound. He stated that it does not give a great market value increase to the properties included in the district. Further, parcels can be decertified and "knocked out" of the district. He stated that districts can be • modified and added to or subtracted from a district over time. After further discussion of what to include, Chamberlain came up with TIF district boundaries. Brown stated that the entire city of Mound should be used for the project area. Mound HRA Meeting July 13, 1999 Page 3 • MOTION BY BROWN, SECONDED BY HANUS TO ACCEPT THE TIF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Chamberlain will put together a pazcel list for Inman to start the analysis with for cost of the appraisals. Inman discussed the pros and cons of using the entire corporate city limits for the project azea. MOTION BY BROWN, SECONDED BY WEYCKER TO DEFINE THE PROJECT AREA AS THE CORPORATE CITY BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF MOUND AND CALL THIS "PROJECT AREA NUMBER 1." MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Dean prepared and presented the following resolution: RESOLUTION 99-6 FINDING OF THE EXISTANCE OF STRUCTURALLY SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS ON REAL ESTATE PROPERTY THAT MAY BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS the City of Mound ("City) and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound ("Authority's aze considering the creation of certain tax increment districts or district within the downtown azea of Mound pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 469; and WHEREAS included within the area under consideration is a tract of land currently owned by the • Westonka School District ("Property'; and WHEREAS the Property contains buildings and other improvements that the Authority believes qualify as "structurally substandard" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174. sub. 10 of the Minnesota tax increment financing laws; and WHEREAS the Authority intends to undertake the development of the Property and , in this regard, has determined that it may create a new tax increment financing district to encompass the Property and may, in its sole discretion, provide a funding source for the development of the Property; and WHEREAS the Authority believes that it may be necessary and desirable for the school district to demolish the building located on the Property prior to the time that a new tax increment district can be created even though the purpose of demolition will be to prepare the Property for redevelopment; and WHEREAS Minnesota State Statutes, section 469.174. sub. 10(b) provides that a parcel of property on which a structurally standard building has been demolished may still be treated as if occupied by such building for purposes of creating a tax increment financing district if prior to demolition the Authority finds by resolution that the pazcel was occupied by a structurally substandard building and that the Authority intends to include the pazcel in a tax increment financing district ;and WHEREAS the Authority by this resolution intends to preserve its ability to deem the Property as occupied by structurally substandazd buildings for purposes of including the Property in a future tax increment financing district Mound HRA Meeting July 13, 1999 Page 4 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Boazd of Commissioners of the Authority as follows: 1. Based upon all of the information available to the Authority, including reports of the Authority's staff, the Authority finds that each parcel of Property is occupied by a structurally substandard building for the following reasons: a) At least 15% of the azea of each pazcel comprising the Property is occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements; b) Each building located on the Property contains defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies aze of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance; and c) The buildings aze not in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings and could not be modified to satisfy building code at a cost of less than 15 % of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same squaze footage and type on this site. 2. After demolition of the buildings the Authority intends to include the Property in a new tax increment financing district if such district is created. Adopted by the Boazd of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota this day of , 1999. Exhibit A to this resolution contains'a legal description of the Property. MOTION BY AHRENS, SECONDED BY BROWN, TO ACCEPT THE RESOLUTION AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Dean stated that it would be appropriate to visit with the school district and see if their demolition can be slowed. Chamberlain added the caveat, however, that if they were to use the school district property for the new post office, things would need to move quickly. Chamberlain covered the time line on the downtown redevelopment projects as outlined in the packet. Brown asked if the redevelopment projects would come before the Planning Commission and how will they be updated. Meisel asked if this was a preliminary schedule and if it was included in their packets would this be sufficient. Weiland stated that it would be a wonderful idea and stated it would help them keep up with the projects. Dean stated that if land use issues normally came before the Planning Commission, they would have a role in reviewing the `TIF plans. They also would be reviewed in light of the Comprehensive Plan. Some process items were discussed on how to review before various commissions. Weycker stated it should come before the Pazk Commission for the open spaces also. MOTION BY AHRENS SECONDED BY WEYCKER, TO ACCEPT THE TARGETED • TIME GUIDELINES FOR DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AS OUTLINED IN THE JULY 8,1999 MEMO FROM CHAMBERLAIN. MOTION CARRIED 5-0. CONSENT AGENDA ~ t Mound HR4 Meeting • July 13, 1999 Page 5 Board Minutes: 6/ZZ/99 These minutes were put on hold until the next meeting. Monthly Bills MOTION BY WEYCKER, SECONDED BY AHRENS, TO PAY BILLS. MOTION CARRIED: 5-0. REPORTS Accountants Reports Presented by Karol Charon Bank Statements Presented by Karol Charon. RESOLUTION 99-4: ASSIGNING CERTAIN DUTIES TO CITY MANAGER. MOTION BY AHRENS, SECONDED BY HANDS, TO MOVE RESOLUTION 99-4. MOTION CARRIED: 5-0. • RESOLUTION 99-5: ESTABLISHING THE TAX LEVY FOR MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR YEAR 2000. • MOTION BY AHRENS, SECONDED BY BROWN, TO MOVE RESOLUTION 99-5. MOTION CARRIED: 5-0. TENANT REPRESENTATIVE REPORT None DISCUSSION ITEMS PHAS Grade: Charon covered the report card and what it meant. New Printer: Charon covered the problems she is having with the department printer especially when connecting to the County's GIS system and the possible need to replace the printer. Hanus suggested she check to make sure it was truly a printer problem and not a connection problem. ADJOURNMENT MOTION BY BROWN, SECONDED BY WEYCKER, TO ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED:S-0. The meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.m. • • RESOLUTION 99-6 FINDING OF THE EXISTANCE OF STRUCTURALLY SUBSTANDARD BUILDINGS ON REAL ESTATE PROPERTY THAT MAY BE INCLUDED IN A FUTURE TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS the City of Mound ("City) and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound ("Authority") are considering the creation of certain tax increment districts or district within the downtown area of Mound pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 469; and WHEREAS included within the area under consideration is a tract of land currently owned by the Westonka School District ("Property"); and WHEREAS the Property contains buildings and other improvements that the Authority believes qualify as "structurally substandard" within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174. sub. 10 of the Minnesota tax increment financing laws; and WHEREAS the Authority intends to undertake the development of the Property and , in this regard, has determined that it may create a new tax increment financing district to encompass the Property and may, in its sole discretion, provide a funding source for the development of • the Property; and C WHEREAS the Authority believes that it may be necessary and desirable for the school district to demolish the building located on the Property prior to the time that a new tax increment district can be created even though the purpose of demolition will be to prepare the Property for redevelopment; and WHEREAS Minnesota State Statutes, section 469.174. sub. 10(b) provides that a parcel of property on which a structurally standard building has been demolished may still be treated as if occupied by such building for purposes of creating a tax increment financing district if prior to demolition the Authority finds by resolution that the parcel was occupied by a structurally substandard building and that the Authority intends to include the parcel in a tax increment financing district ;and WHEREAS the Authority by this resolution intends to preserve its ability to deem the Property as occupied by structurally substandard buildings for purposes of including the Property in a future tax increment financing district NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the Authority as follows: 1. Based upon all of the information available to the Authority, including reports of the Authority's staff, the Authority finds that each parcel of Property is occupied by a structurally substandard building for the following reasons: a) At least 15% of the area of each parcel comprising the Property is occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other improvements; ,_ b) Each building located on the Property contains defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior • partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance; and c) The buildings are not in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings and could not be modified to satisfy building code at a cost of less than 15% of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on this site. 2. After demolition of the buildings the Authority intends to include the Property in a new tax increment financing district if such district is created. Adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota this day of , 1999. Exhibit A to this resolution contains a legal description of the Property. MOTION BY AHRENS, SECONDED BY BROWN, TO ACCEPT THE RESOLUTION AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED 5-0 • ~ro haron, Executive Director .~/ ~ Pat Meisel, Chairperson • .. .. t u _ 07!16/99 10:18 F:11 CITY OF !4i0I`ND 1~J003 • ~isrr a Dt~crlptton of the property o~sc~tPttot4 tots t, 2, 3, 4, 9. 5, 7, d, 9. 10. t+. +2. t3• +~. t3, +6 and 17, 'Lynwotd Pali Lake fainnstonko, ocwrdinq to the rseadad ofat tl+enot, Flenneath County, ginnesoto: rocattd Ridgerrvod Arenas snd rateted offer o'191ra0fr dalir.eatsd and eedissted h+ sak ebt of Lynwold Pa's tolca f.t[nneta^1ce. Sao lot t8• ~ltnnfsoto~ a esp~t ttie~t^atM~ 0 d0 Nest t~her afthe reeerded D+dt thereof. r+ennspM County, use Lola 90. 4t, 02. 93. 9a, 9S. 9i, 9t. 9a. 99, +00. tOt. tOt. t09. +t36. toy. toa. +09. 1 t 0. 11 t , 1 t g., ! t 3. ! 14, 115. ' 1~lQtitat7 , oeeerdinQ to tha recorded Dia! thercot. Hennepin Ftennapfn CoY~ty, MinnesOtO. ~!O r-oie Darts et lots 10~ and t03. 'MOUNtY. accord~n~p to tha *storded obi thsreot. }lenneptn Coynt~r Ltinnesota, which N• eest~ry of tHC sost iine of the nest ZO0.00 tact of the htoRheast t~u6rler of the Soutktas! Ouorter at Section 14. Towr~si+~0 1 t 1 North. Range Zt west of rite 5th Prinetgel iter,dian. • rVso Thet Bart et wsadow Loe~e. et dNlneated ahd dsdkotsd en (hs 01st of • f,AOt>t~. ocsord~n9 to thn rseerded p-at therset, Hen^eoln Cait~n!y. iMinnssota, and now vaeoted. which rss eeslery of the vast 200.00 test of the Nortl,eaat Ovarter o- tha Soutkwat Qtrorter of Semen t t~ To+rnahip t ! 7 Narth, RonQs 24 weer of the 5th Prlne~pef )Aattdie~, and sre~terly of the southerly txtens{on of tha test rns of Oe~~ii avsnue, no+~ known os 6e c' a Lone. as degneoted and ded~eated In sold t-bt of 'MOU~fO' Afso The South NoM of t1,e Northeast Quarter at the Southeast Qvertsr of Section ~ t, Torr+sh~o t t 7 North, Range 2t west of rite Sth Prtnctoo+ 1~teridtan. e+ceaat rite .tat 200.00 Fos! ttie-aot, also s:ctot tt+at port +ritt+in Me plat et 'MOVNOr. aeeoroln~ to th. rsceroed Drat thersCf, ttennepin County, rtinnsseta. end a+eeDt that part eeser~bad es tN~e•r Comrttsrtatn9 pt the Hartbeest torr+er o+ sod South Ftolt o* rns Narthsost Ovartar or the Southeast Cvarter, them sevtherltr. abn9 the Last has of sai0 Sautheoe! OYartar, a distond of 229.00 feet; thsnos west patelier .tth the no~lk nna o+ sold South hart of tha No~+ees! Ouarta• o+ tM~avtheast Q;tirarter. to the ;ntereeet:on with the souths~fy tstsnOlCrs et the +~est Mt of OteeY !venue. r'a~r fn+ern of delblrs Lsne, as deifweetsd end dedlaetad in the ofet et ftOVkL~ : ttis^et nortf+s*~y sb*9 sold souther~y t:teniro~ to tf+e ^ertR 1'r•e of said South woes e+ ttis Nsrthesst auerter of the Sa~ut'+sost Quarter; thanes aosterly, efa~p sod *ertk me to the volnt of begM^lnq. end erespt that Dart of said 5euth HaH et the Northeast Quertt* et the 5evtheact Ouvrtsr dastrtbed as fefle.rs- BsQlnning eE o point on the east 1Pne of said Northtost tiuerter at the Southeast Quarter, dlstont 225.00 feet sovthery from the nortt+eost f.orrter or laid South Hoff of the NorM+eas! Overter of the Seytheeet gustier; li±er+ee .ssterly, varopet .ft~- tt+. ~erM nne of ee;d South reK et the NorFi+.est Cuorler er tt•s Soot•+eost QveRsr, o dtator,ee or 390.63 fast; thence seethe ds+fect' to Use kt! 90 d. -eas 00 n+lnutss 00 seconds. o dbtaett of t~34 teet:~+er+ce easter;tr. Os~~ectfn to the left 1!9 digress 57 minutes ZZ eecends, to said coat ~~e at the Nar+haes~ 4varter of t?+e Southeast 4vortsr. lhente wer3hs*y efen4 sod sosl fine to the oo1^t e! beginning. rav.tes~ss 3 Nttrzou•- -tS-d t-0/1'0'd BdSr-1 OIE~lEEEl9+ N3AYa9 ! ,lG3Np3Il-'~~d l0~£t 6Q-11-l0 ~"if!I ,.,,_ 1. it ~ • i MOIIND HRA RESOLIITION N0.99-5 A RESOLIITION ESTABLISHING THE TAB LEVY FOR THE MOIIND HOIISING AND REDEVELOPMENT AOTHORITY FOR THE YEAR 2000 BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound, as follows: Section 1: That there be and hereby is levied $ 24,000 for the year 2000 on all taxable property, real and personal, situated within the corporate limits of the City of Mound and not exempted by the Constitution of the State of Minnesota, for the purposes of establishing an HRA Fund and conducting the operation of an ® HRA pursuant to the provisions of MS 469.001 through 469.068. Section 2: That the consent resolution by the City ® Council of the City of Mound to this special tax for the operation of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority is attached to this resolution and made a part of it. Section 3: That said tax levy shall be certified to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before September 15, 1999 Passed by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound thi~s-*hirteenth day of July, 1999 tive Director 1 ! CITY OF MOUND HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Council member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. It has been proposed that the City adopt business subsidycriteria, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995 as reflected in attached Exhibit for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The Council has reviewed the City's goals and policies and has caused the business subsidies criteria to be prepared. 1.03. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption and approval of the proposed business subsidies, including the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. ® Section 2. Approval and Adoption of the Business Subsidy Criteria. 2.01. The business subsidy criteria, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file at the City. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Dated: December 14, 1999 ATTEST: Mayor (Seal) City Clerk MAY 09 '00 10~53AM FREERS 8~ ASSOCIATES RD v -v~v -- G ~ f7 P . 22 CotGNG I lam,, NOTIft:E OF PUBLIC HEARING • CITY OF MOUND COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF NID~NESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound (the "City"), County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, wilt held a public hearing on May 23, 2000, at approximately 7:30 pm at the City Council Chambers in the Mound City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, regarding a proposed business subsidy to be granted by the City m Ray Mar Properties tnc. a.k.a Mound Family Hardware Story, {the "Recipient") under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 11bJ.993 through 116J.994. The proposed subsidy involves tax increment financing assistance to facilitate development by the Recipient of a retail center including a hardware store in the City. Information about the proposed business subsidy and a copy of the draft business subsidy agreement are available for inspection at City Hall during regular business hours. All interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their views orally or prior to [he meeting ~n writing. Dated: S = ~,-©O • BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i~10UI~iD, MINNESOTA Isl / ~M~t~p C- ~ City Clerk ~~. D~~ " ~~y 13f zone ~_ • N:'•Minnx~i~Mound.TlF 2tpub hex nM r{rmt;ng iubs.~pd :~ ~ ~~f r.G~G THE SODSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CI?Y OF MOUND RESOLUTIOI~i g ~..~.LJ 1 RESOLU?ION REQUESTING Tl[~ CJ1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MODIFICAYION OF DEVLLOpMEA'T D)<.STRICTNO. 1 AND THE ESTABLI3111<MEN? OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.1-Z (A REDEVELOPMENT DISTiItICT), BE 1T RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners (the "Board") of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "HRA") as follows; WHEREAS, the City Council ("che Council") of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City"} has established Development District No. 1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes. Sections 4b9.001 through 469.047, inclusive, as amended, in an effort to encourage the development and redevelopment of certain designated tress within tbs City; and • WHEREAS, the City to proposingthe -nodifieation of the Development Program for Development District No. 1 and the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No_ 1-2, pursuant to and in accordartee With Minnesota Statutes, Scctiotu 469.001 through 469.047 and Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board as follows: 1 • The HRA hereby requests that the Council call for a public hearing on December l 4, I999 to consider the proposed adoption of the ModiPtcation to the Development Program for Development District No. 1 and the proposed adoption of the Tsx Increment Financing Plan for'1'ax lncrentent Financing DIstriet No. I -2 (wllectively, the "ProIItam and Plan")and cause notice of said public hearing to be given is required by few. 2. The HRA directs the Executive Director to transmit copies of the Program and Plan to the Planning Commission of the City and requests the Planning Cotnmissioa's written opinion indicating whether the proposed program and Plan are in accordance with tbs Comprehensive Platt of the City, prior to the date of the pubfie hcaring. 3. The Executive Director of the HRA is hereby directed to subretit a copy of the Program and plan to the Council for its approvat. ~• 'The HRA directs the Executive Director to transmit the Program and Plan to the count; and the school district(s) in which Tax Increment Financing District No. i -2 is beat not later than Novctnber I2, i999. Approved by the Board on Septsmbsr~,,~ 1999. i Arl•1: Chair ~ y