Loading...
1999-10-26MINUTES -MOUND HRA -OCTOBER 26,1999 • The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in a regular session on Tuesday, October 26, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, and Leah Weycker; Acting City Manager Fran Clark; City Attorney John Dean; Housing and Redevelopment Director Pinky Charon; and Secretary Sue McCulloch. *Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the Council. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or Citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. T.I.F. AGENDA 1.0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 12.1999. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Weycker, to accept the minutes as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0. 1.1 RENT FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT. The City Attorney explained the Rent Forbearance Agreement. A tenant leaving the premises prompted this document. The Agreement states the property owner agrees not to rent, occupy or otherwise use the property for the term of the Agreement, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority agrees to pay the property owner a rent forbearance payment, plus interest, if and when the Housing and Redevelopment Authority acquires the property. If the landlord decides he would rather rent the property out, he can do so and will simply lose the accumulation. The City Attorney restated if the City does not acquire the property, this Agreement will not be implemented. The qualifications of the Agreement include (1) the property needs to be vacant, but occupied by a tenant for a continuous six-month period ending not longer than 30 days prior to the date the property owner makes a rental forbearance request; (2) the property has been occupied by tenants for at least 30 months during the last three years; (3) the property is rentable; (4) the property has to be located within an area that is subject to either a exclusive rights agreement or a contract for private redevelopment; and (5) the assistance available under the Agreement has to be equivalent or greater than the anticipated relocation benefit would be due absent this Agreement. The City Attorney stated this idea was suggested to the property owner and it would be workable with him. This Agreement also states that the City has no obligation to acquire the property. The benefit of this Agreement for the City is to not have to pay relocation payments. • ~~ MOUND HRA MINITTES -OCTOBER 26.1999 Councilmember Weycker stated if there is an unforeseen problem that comes up which does not __ allow the City to acquire the property for two years, then it appears the City would have been better off than to have a Rent Forbearance Agreement. The City Attorney addressed Councilmember Weycker's concern and stated the Agreement does terminate at the end of 2000, or sooner if agreed by all parties, and then the property could then be rented out by the property owner. Councilmember Hanus wanted to confirm if the City does enter into the Agreement and the City does not acquire the property, then the City is not obligated to any costs. The City Attorney agreed with this statement and there is no risk to the City by executing this Agreement. Councilmember Hanus asked if in theory, these are sitting empty, the cost to the landlord is lower than if they were occupied. The City Attorney stated there was an average taken and the City will assume the utility costs and fixed costs will have to be paid by the property owner, but the costs will not be as high as if they were occupied. The City will save monies of wear and tear on the buildings under the Rent Forbearance Ageement. Councilmember Weycker asked why the City would be paying interest to the tenants, and by law, the City has to because it is holding onto the monies being collected. Councilmember Weycker stated she would like to have the interest payment negotiated and agreed upon by both parties. Councilmember Weycker stated each Agreement would be accepted on its own merits if others do come about. MOTION by Weycker, seconded by Hanus, to allow conceptual passing of the Rent Forbearance Agreement with the above qualifications. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0. 1.2 BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA. The City Attorney stated this matter will be considered on November 1, 1999, at the Committee of the Whole Meeting and all materials will be made available for discussion then. Jim Prosser, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority coordinator, will be present at the November 1, 1999, meeting to assist in any questions the councilmembers may have at that time. The City Attorney stated this is a requirement by normal procedure, although there will be reporting obligations, guidelines concerning wage goals and job goals, and developer obligations to meet those goals that come with this agreement. The City Attorney stated this agreement does not change what the City does in redevelopment work, but it essentially is conforming with state requirement for redevelopment projects. 1.3 COMMUNICATIONS. Mayor Meisel stated the communications presented include a correspondence from the School District, a Balboa Title review, and a project management schedule. The schedule was handed 3~ob MOUND ffitA MINUTES -OCTOBER 26.1999 out to the councilmembers tonight. Mayor Meisel stated these are all follow-up items from • previous meetings. Councilmember Ahrens questioned the Balboa Title Review and its purpose. Mayor Meisel stated it is merely an information item that keeps the councilmembers apprised of what is going on with the project. 1.3 OTHER ITEMS. There were no other items to be heard at tonight's meeting. *INDIAN KNOLL CONSENT AGENDA. *1.4 APPROVAL OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 28,1999. MOTION. Hanus, Ahrens, unanimously. *1.5 MONTHLY BILLS. MOTION. Hanus, Ahrens, unanimously. H.RA. ACTION ITEMS. 1.6 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S ROLE IN THE TTF PROCESS. Mayor Meisel stated she spent some time discussing this role with the City Attorney and it was decided that Jim Prosser will be given the active role in the TIF Process and he will keep Ms. Charon abreast of all developments. On November 1, 1999, the Committee of the Whole will have Mr. Prosser present for discussions regarding this topic. INFORMATION ITEMS. Accountant Reports. 2. Bank statements. Information packet about Q.H.W.R.A. Act for HUD and our responsibilities in the future to comply. 4. Information packet - PHAS -HUD's New Report Card. 3~0~ MOiJND HRA 1~QN[JTES -OCTOBER 26. 1999 5. GAAP conversion on monthly bills. Ms. Charon stated there is concern about the over abundant use of the Internet site in trying to set up the information appropriately. Other HRA directors are reporting this information in the middle of the night because of the vast amount of people trying to get onto one site. Ms. Charon is trying to do a lot of mentoring and routing of copies to appropriate people to try and keep the deadlines being set. Mayor Meisel asked if HUD is aware of the overuse of the Internet site and Ms. Charon stated they are aware of the problems that exist. Ms. Charon stated HUD is moving way too fast and they cannot keep up with the pace they are setting for themselves. Ms. Charon stated an Act that got passed in October states a list of things that need to be done by the HRA of Mound. Ms. Charon is working on the admission policy, which is only one item on the list, and this document is 72 pages in length. There are several more policies, along with the admission policy, that will need to be reviewed and approved by the council. Ms. Charon will try and present one or two policies per month to the council. Mayor Meisel stated the next Housing and Redevelopment Authority meeting will be held on November 23, 1999, at 6:30 p.m. 1.7 TENANT REPRESENTATIVE REPORT. There was nothing to report. 1.8 ADJOURNMENT. MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Hanus, to adjourn the meeting at 7:34 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 5-0. '~ ,~: ~ ` Francene C. Clark, Acting C ty Manager • 4 3~0$ • City Of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority Letter Nevember 5,1999 Issue Statement: Consideration to establish December 14, 1999 for a joint public hearing with the City Council on the business subsidy criteria policy. Background: Beginning August 1, 1999, local governments face new requirements for granting business subsidies took effect. These requirements replace the current wage and job goal reporting. The new law applies to the Housing and Redevelopment agency. It means that the HRA must meet the following requirments It requires that the business subsidy meet a public purpose-- other than increasing the tax base. Job retention is a public purpose only if job loss is "imminent and demonstrable;" • Establish business subsidy criteria The entity must establish and hold a public hearing to adopt the criteria. The only statutory requirement for contents of the criteria is a policy for wages on jobs created by the subsidies. The statute does not discuss a process for amending the criteria. This provision seems to impose separate requirements for each potential grantor. If, for example, a city, a county and a school district were all abating a • business' taxes, all three (including the school district) would need to establish and approve separate criteria. Enter into a subsidy agreement. The statue requires that the subsidy agreement define, among other things enumerated in the statute, wage and job goals, the nature of, the amount of, the reasons for, and the goals for the subsidy. The agreement must also describe what happens if the recipient fails to fulfill its obligations, and must contain a commitment from the recipient "to continue operations at the site where the subsidy is used for at least five years after the benefit date". Failure to meet goals requires partial or full repayment of the assistance with interest. Again, the subsidy agreement requirement seems to apply to each grantor, which in the case of abatement could potentially mean the city, the county and the school district. This agreement must be signed by the local elected governing body. Hold a public hearing on the subsidy if it exceeds $100,000 (or, if the grantor is the state government, $500,000). The statutes contains specific criteria for the notice of hearing. The notice must be published at least 10 days prior to the hearing. Recommended Motion: Move to set December 14, 1999 at 7:30 PM as the date for a joint public hearing with the City Council on the Business Subsidy Criteria policies. 3~~~ • Basis of Recommendation: It is necessary to set a hearing date in order to comply with state law. Alternative Recommendations: The hearing date may be changed to another time. Decision Mode: This matter will be presented at the HRA meeting of November 9. • • ~~~ 0 City Of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority Letter November 5,1999 Issue Statement: Confirm expenditure for environmental and geotechnical study of the Balboa property. Background: In September, 1999, the HRA entered into a purchase agreement for the purchase of two properties owned by Balboa Center Limited Partnership and located on County Road 15. The agreement is contingent on two occurrences: (1) by November 13, 1999, the HRA must have determined that the matters and conditions disclosed by its investigation of the property, including soils tests and environmental assessments, are satisfactory to the HRA; and (2) by November 27, 1999, the HRA must have determined that purchase of the property is feasible and authorized by law. Kennedy and Graven, acting on behalf of the HRA, has contracted with STS Consultants, Ltd. to perform a Phase I environmental investigation. STS reported the results of that investigation verbally to me through several telephone conversations. In summary, the properties in question are located within an area that may once have been a part of the "Lost Lake dump site." In addition, Minnesota Pollution Control Records indicate that a monitoring well was located on the site, and that the well indicated low levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), as well as petroleum products. The petroleum products may have come from an adjacent property now occupied by Super America, which is the site of an identified leak. The VOCs may have come from the Tonka property located across County Road 15 from the properties in question. The Tonka property is the site of two identified release plumes, one of which is located centrally on the Tonka property and flows in a northeasterly direction. The other plume is located near the west end of the Tonka property and flows in awest-southwesterly direction. Based on this information, STS recommended that the HRA conduct a Phase II investigation, which will involve soil borings. Phase II investigation was verbally authorized on November 4, 1999. STS has indicated that the Phase II investigation will not be complete by November 13 but should be completed by November 26, 1999, prior to the HRA's final deadline for waiving the feasibility contingency. In addition, STS will simultaneously perform a geotechnical analysis of the soils, to determine the suitability of the soils for building. The estimated cost of the Phase II and geotechnical analysis is approximately $17,000. Depending upon the results of the Phase II and geotechnical investigation, the HRA will need to decide whether to proceed with the purchase of the property or not. In that connection, the HRA needs to know that there is a Memorandum of Agreement that has been recorded against the properties. The agreement dates back to 1984, and in the agreement Tonka Corporation made certain promises for the benefit of Balboa Minnesota Co. and all future legal and equitable ~. ~~~ owners of the properties covered by the agreement. In summary, the agreement provides: • • Tonka Corporation agreed to indemnify Balboa Minnesota and all future legal and equitable owners of the properties covered by the agreement, including tenants, against losses, costs, damages and expense, including attorney fees, consultant fees and engineering fees, resulting from or related to or claimed or alleged to be resulting from or related to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances, waste, pollutants or contaminants that were or are claimed or alleged to have been located on the properties by Tonka Corporation at any time prior to the sale of the property from Tonka to Balboa. • The indemnification covers the actual and direct costs of removal and remedial actions and restoration of the properties and improvements thereon, as well as claims for personal injury and property damage brought by third persons or entities. It does not cover economic loss or damage such as potential reduction in resale price of the properties, loss of rentals, loss of time, productivity, sales or profits. • Tonka Corporation has the right to conduct, monitor or control any removal or remedial actions, in Tonka's discretion. Tonka must give the property owner 10 days' prior notice. • Balboa and future owners may not unilaterally proceed with removal or remedial actions unless under order of a court, and Balboa and future owners must obtain Tonka Corporation's consent before undertaking any particular removal or remedial action. • Tonka Corporation has the right to control any form of dispute resolution related to a release or threatened release, and Balboa and future owners agree to cooperate with Tonka and not take unilateral action without Tonka's approval. • Balboa and future owners must give Tonka Corporation notice of any correspondence, legal notice, lawsuit or other communications from any person relating to the alleged release or threatened release of hazardous substances, waste, pollutants or contaminants. • Tonka Corporation has a continuing right of entry on the properties in order to conduct removal or remedial actions and agrees to cause as little disruption as reasonably possible. Kennedy and Graven will contact Hasbro, Inc.'s attorneys to verify that Hasbro, Inc. has assumed the obligations of Tonka Corporation under the Memorandum of Agreement. ff Hasbro, Inc. does stand behind the agreement, it would appear that the geotechnical investigation may have a greater bearing on the HRA's decision to proceed than the results of the Phase II investigation. Kennedy and Graven will report further to the HRA as information becomes available. Recommended Motion: Motion to confirm the expenditure of $17,000 for environmental study to be performed by STS Consultants. Basis of Recommendation: The results of this study aze necessary to assess the cost to correct any soil problems. This will provide the HRA with information necessary to assess whether and under what conditions the property will be purchased. Alternative Recommendations: The HRA could decide to terminate the soil investigation. However, without this information it will be not be possible to make an informed decision on the ~~lo~. purchase of this property. Decision Mode: This matter will be presented at the HRA meeting of November 9,1999. N:\Minnsota\Mound\11.9.99hraagenda.wpd r: -~~i3 R~ ~q ~ s ~° .. ^ublic Housing Assessment System U.S. Department of Housing snd Urban Development . (PHAS) Real Estate Assessment Center ' Management Operations Certification OMB No. 2535-0106 (exp. 813112001) Public nsporgng burden for this collection of information is estimated io average 2.15 hours per response, inducting the timefor reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. This agonry may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMa control number. This information is collected to implement section 502 of the National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, as amended, which esiabgshed spectftc indicators to assess the management performance of public housing agenaes (PHAS) in aq major areas at management operations. PHAS wiq complete the PHAS Ceniftcation, form HUD-50072, and electronicalry subm(t it to HUO. If a PHA does not have this capability in-house, the PHA should consider utigzing local resources, such as the library or another local gwemmeni entity that has Internet access. In the event local resources are not available, a PHA may go to the nearest HUD Public and Indian Hous~rg program office and assistance will be given to the PHA to transmit this PHAS certification. The (niomlation is used by HUD as a component of PHAS to assess all major areas of PHA's management operations, designate PHAS as troubled and PHAS troubled with respell to the program for assistance from the Capital Fund under Section 9, enter Into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with troubled PHAS, and report annually to Congresson the status of troubled PHAS and PHAS troubled with respect to the program for assistance from the Capital Fund under Section 9. This infomtation is required for HUD to fulfill statutory requirements of fhe 1990 Ad. The information collected does not lend itself to confidentiality. Instructions: A PHA/RMClAME's electronic responses to this certification must be the PHA/RMC/AME's actual data; e.g., prior to any adjustments to the indicators. Round percentages to the nearest two decimal points. PHA/RMCIAME Name Far FY Ending (mmlddM~yy) Submission Dab (rrNdd/yyyy) Project name(s) HRMC/AME The management functions for the following sub-indicator (s} have been assumed by an RMC/AME, and the RMC/AME certification will be completed and electronically submitted to HUD (enter sub-indicator numbers or NIA): Sub-Indicator Number 1 Vacancy Rate and Unit Turnaround Time Component Number 1 Vacancy Rate V10000 Total number of ACC days S d V10100 Total number of non-dwelling days _Q- V10200 Total number of employee occupied days ~V10300 Total number of days where units were deprogrammed V10400 Total number of actual vacancy days 3 ~ V10500 Total number of vacancy days exempted for capital funds V10600 Total number of vacancy days exempted for market conditions V10700 Total number of vacancy days where units were exempted due to law or regulations V10800 Total number of vacancy days where units were exempted for other reasons V10900 Percentage points reduction of actual vacancies within past three years (calculated) ~'° V11000 Total available days (Read Only) ~ 5 V11100 Actual vacancy rate (Read Only) !G ~• T { ~0 V11200 Adjusted vacancy days {Read Only) 3 ,- V11300 Adjusted vacancy rate {Read Only) ~0 Corn onent Number 2 Unit Tumaround Time Note: The followin fields are mandator ,regardless of the vacancy rate scoreG. V12400 Total number of turnaround days _I V12500 Total number of vacancy days exempted for capital funding Q V12600 Total number of vacancy days exempted for other reasons V12700 Total number of vacant units turned around and leased in the PHA's immediate past fiscal year V12800 Average number of calendar days units were in down time V12900 Average number of calendar days units were in make ready time ~V73000 Average number of calendar days units were in lease up time V13100 Average Unit Tumaround Days (Read Only) I ~ ~ "' forth HUO•50072 (8!1999) Previous editions era obsolete. Page 1 of 4 ref. Handbook 7460.5 Sub-Indicator Number 2 Capital Fund Component Number 1 Unexpended Funds Over Three Federal Fiscal Years (FFYs) Old CF10000 Do you have any open capital fund (Components 1 and 2 - CIAP, Comp Grant, LBP; Component 3,4 and 5 -Vacancy Reduction and Hope VI) programs? "Open" is any program that does not have a ~ pre-audit end date or that received apre-audit end date during the fiscal year being assessed. Yes CF10050 Total funds authored within 3 FFYs CF10100 Total funds expended within 3 FFYs $ CF10200 Unexpended funds to be recaptured $ CF10300 Unexpended funds approved by HUD beyond 3 FFYs § CF10400 Unexpended funds with time extensions due to reasons outside of PHA's control S CF10500 Adjusted total unexpended funds (Read Only) $ Component Number 2 Timeliness of Fund Obligation CF11100 Total funds authorized for grants older than 2 FFYs $ CF11200 Total funds obligated within 2 FFYs $ CF11300 Unobligated funds approved by HUD beyond 2 FFYs $ CF11400 Unobligated funds with time extensions due to reasons outside of PHA's control $ CF11500 Adjusted total Unobligated funds (Read Only) $ Component Number 3 Adequacy of Contract Administration CF11700 The date of the last HUD/Army Corps of Engineers on-site inspection andlor audit related to contract administration (mmlddlyyyy) CF11800 The number of findings related to contract administration. CF11900 The number of findings related to contract administration that have been corrected by the PHA CF12000 The number of findings related to contract administration that the PHA is in the process of correcting Component Number 4 Ouality of the Physical Work CF12200 The date of the last HUOlArmy Corps of Engineers on-site inspection and/or audit related to the quality of physical work (mm/dd/yyyy) CF12300 The number of findings related to the qualRy of physical work CF12400 CF12500 The number of findings related to the quality of physical work that have been corcected by the PHA The number of finding related to the quality of physical work that the PHA is in the process of correcting Component Number 5 Adequacy of Budget Controls CF12700 CF12800 Total amount of capital funds expended during the PHA fiscal year being assessed Amount of capital funds expended on approved work items not subject to budget revisions during the PHA fiscal year being assessed $ 5 CF12900 Amount of capital funds expended under budget revisions with prior HUD approval during the PHA fiscal year being assessed $ CF13000 Amount of capital funds expended under budget revisions not requiring prior HUD approval during the PHA fiscal year bein assessed $ Sub-Indicator Number 3 Rents Uncollected R10000 Dwelling rent owed by residents in possession at the beginning of the assessed fiscal year, tamed $ ~S •3 forward from the previous fiscal year R10100 Dwelling rents billed during the fiscal year being assessed S g~• ~ ~G R10200 Dwelling rents collected during the fiscal year being assessed $ 5 .3 -1 R10300 Rents uncollected (Read Only) $ 3• R10400 Percentage of rents uncollected (Read Only) '~ % form HUO•50071 (8/1999) Previous editions are obsolete. Page 2 of 4 raf. Handbook 7460.5 Sub-Indicator Number 4 Work Orders Component Number 1 Emer~ncy Work Orders W 10000 Total number of emergency work orders W 10100 Total number of emergency work orders corrected /abated within 24 hours • W 10200 Percentage of emergency work orcJers completed /abated within 24 hours (Read Only) ~ ~~ 9'0 Component Number 2 Non-Emergency Work Orders W 10500 Total number of non-emergency work orders "~ W10600 Total number of calendar days it took to complete non-emergency work orders W 10700 Average number of days PHA has reduced the time it takes to complete non-emergency work orders over the past three years (enter average number of days) (Read Only) W10800 Average completion days (Read Only) , g1 Sub-Indicator Number 5 Annual Inspection of Dwelling Units and Systems Component Number 1 Annual Inspection of Dwelling Units A10000 The total number of ACC unitsrj A10100 The sum of units exempted where the PHA made two documented attempts to inspect and is enforcing the lease ~ A10200 Vacant units exempted for modemization A10300 Vacant units exempted for other reasons A10400 Total number of units inspected using the Uniform Physical Condition Standards A10500 Total number of units inspected meeting the Uniform Physical Condition Standards A10600 The number of units where necessary repairs were completed to comply with Uniform Physical Conditions Standards either during the inspection, issued work orders for the repairs, or referred the deficiency to the current year's or next year's modernization program A10700 Adjusted units available (Read Onlyj A10800 Percent of units inspected by PHA (Read Only) ~ ~ ~ ~'~ A10900 Percent meeting Uniform Physical Condition Standards (Read Only) ~ $ °~ Component Number 2 Annual Inspection of Systems including Common Areas and Nan-Dwelling Space A11100 Total number of contiguous sites (adjoining with no natural boundaries) A11200 Total number of contiguous sites (adjoining with no natural boundaries) exempted from the inspection of systems O A11300 The total number of contiguous sites (adjoining with no natural boundaries) where all systems were inspected in accordance with the PHA maintenance plan ' A11400 Total number of buildings A11500 Total number of buildings exempted from the inspection of systems A11600 The total number of buildings where all systems were inspected in accordance with the PHA maintenance plan A11700 The number of buildings and sites where necessary repairs were completed to comply with the Uniform Physical Conditions Standards either during the inspection, issued work orders for the repairs, or referred the deficiency to the current year's or next year's Capital Fund program. A11800 Percentage of contiguous sites (adjoining with no natural boundaries) inspected (Read Only) ~ % A11900 Percentage of buildings inspected (Read Only) ~ ~ ~O form HUD•50072 (8/1999) Previous edltlons ars obsolete. Page 3 of 4 rsf. Handbook 74.5 Sub-Indicator Number 6 Security and Economic Self-sufficiency Component Number t Tracking and Reporting Crime-Related Problems 310000 The date that the PHA Board adopted current policies to track crime and crime related problems. tmmradryyyyi qi' S10100 The date that the PHA implemented the current procedures to track crime and crime-related problems. (mmroaryyy~ 6 G/ S10200 The date that the PHA implemented a current cooperative system for tracking and reporting crime to fmvamyyyt N~ local police authorities ~ //~ ~~~ S10300 The number of crimes that the PHA reported b local police authorities a S10400 Percentage of devebpments where PHA can document it tracks crime and crime-related problems ~ O~ ~ Component Number 2 Screening of Applicants S10500 The date the PHA Board adopted current screening policies that reflect the One-Strike criteria t,,.,,,~ynyl ~ S10600 The date the PHA implemented current screening procedures that reflect the One-Strike criteria ~~ (Q S10700 PHA can document that current screening procedures result in successfully denying admission to 12 applicants who meet the One-Strike criteria Yes No S10800 The total number of applicants denied who met the One-Strike criteria Component Number 3 Lease Enbrcement S10900 The date the PHA Board adopted current eviction procedures that reflect the One-Strike criteria tmmradryyyyf ` S11000 The date the PHA implemented wrrent eviction procedures that reflect the One-Strike criteria tmmramryyyl ~ S11100 PHA can document that wrrent eviction screening procedures resulted in the eviction of residents ) who meet the One-Strike crrleria Yes No S11200 The total number of evictions as a result of the One-Strike criteria ' component Number 4 Drug prevention, uime reduction and/or economic self-sufficiency program goals S11300 The number of HUD-funded drug preventioNcrime reduction and/or economic self-sufficiency programs O •S11400 The number of non HUO-funded drug preventioN crime reduction and/or economic self-sufficiency rograms that the PHA oasts to be assessed S11500 The number of documented program goals that are related to drug prevention/crime reduction and/or economic self-sufficiencv f S11600 The number of goals the PHA can document it met under the implementation plans} for any and all of these pro rams S11700 Percentage of goals that the PHA can document it met under implementation plan(s) for any and all of these programs (Read Only} % Adjustments for Physical Condition and/or Neighborhood Environment Please enter project number and name and indicate which area fhe adjustment for Physical Condition and/or Neighborhood Environment applies for a project. (Check all that apply} Project No. Project Name Site Common Building Areas Exter(ors Please attach additional sheets as necessary for addHlonal projects. 1 certify that, as of the submission date, the above Sub-Indicators, under Public Housing Assessment System Indicator Number3 Management Operations are true and accurate for the fiscal year indicated. I further certify that, to my present knowledge, there is no evidence to indicate seriously deficient performance that casts doubt on the PHA's capacity to present and protect its public housing developments and operate them in accordance with Federal law and regulations. Appropriate sanctions for intentional false certification will be imposed, including suspension or debarment of the signatory. A Board Resolution approving this certification ' requi d. I further certif)r that Board Resolution number ~.~,~ _ approving this certification wa~.passed on (mm/dd/YYri) _ ~ ~~~-.~___ Date (rtuNddlyyyy) Previous 13dltions are obsolete. Page 4 of 4 form HUD•50072 (8/1999) rof. Handbook 7460.5