Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2008-01-22
PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA � 1 0-0 ?�--( *Consent A eg nda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Call meeting to order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes: January 8, 2008 regular meeting 128 -132 *B. Approve payment of claims 133 -162 *C. Action on Resolution Approving Variance for Upper Floor 163 -185 • Addition at 4936 Glen Elyn Road (PC Case 07 -30) *D. Action on Resolution Approving Variances for Comprehensive 186 -207 House Remodel /addition at 2029 Arbor Lane (PC Case 07 -31) *E. Action on Resolution Approving Variance for House Remodel/ 208 -239 Addition (attached garage) at 4774 Kildare Rd (PC Case 07 -32) *F. Action on Resolution Ratifying and Confirming Execution of the 240 -268 Funding Agreement for Stormwater Best Management Practices for Phase IV of Mound Redevelopment Project (Transit District) with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Stormwater Maintenance Declaration *G. Action on Ordinance Amending Section 380 of the Mound City 269 -271 Code as it Relates to Establishing Lane Use Fees *H. Approve Pay Request No. 10 from Graham Penn -Co in the amount 272 -273 of $78,249.32 for the Transit Center Parking Facility *I. Action on Resolution Approving an Extension of the License 274 -276 Agreement #A14569 with Hennepin County (EPDB) • * Johnson to LMCD 277 J. Approve Reappointment of Steve r PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 5. Public Hearing PC Case 07 -28: Preliminary Plat/Planning Development Area Conditional 278 -32S Use Permit - Water Resource Permit /WCA and /or wetland permits (B. Benson Group — 6301 Lynwood Blvd.) A. Action on Resolution Approving a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat for the Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Residential Development at 6301 Lynwood Blvd. B. Action on Resolutionn Approving a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Development Area (PDA) for the Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Residential Development at 6301 Lynwood Blvd, C. Action on Resolution Approving the Water Resource Permit Application for Stormwater and Erosion Control for the Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision at 6301 Lynwood Blvd. 6. Comments and suggestions from citizens. present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minute per speaker) 7. Planning Commission Recommendations A. PC Case No. 07 -27: Sketch Plan for Halstead Pointe — Mark Zweber 326 -388 6625/6627/6639 Bartlett Boulevard B. Sign moratorium and ordinance review — electronic signage 389 -395 !8. Public Lands Permit — 1760 Sumach Lane 396 -417 Action on Resolution to Deny Public Lands Permit for 1760 Sumach Lane 9. Miscellaneous /Correspondence A. Comments /reports from Council Members B. Reports: Finance Dept. — December 2007 418 -419 C. Correspondence: D. Other: Proposed Ordinance by LMCD 420 -423 10. Adjourn (� This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas maybe viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www.cityofmound.com. 2 COUNCIL BRIEFING January 22, 2008 �+ Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget! Jan 22 — 6:30 — Regular HRA meeting Jan 22 — 7:00 — Regular CC meeting Jan 28 — 6:30 — Volunteer Appreciation — VFW Feb 12 — 6:30 — Regular HRA meeting Feb 12 — 7:00 — CC Annual Meeting Feb 19 — 7:00 — Joint CC /PC meeting (tentative) Feb 26 — 6:30 — Regular HRA meeting Feb 26 — 7:00 — CC Annual Meeting Mar 10 — Seasonal Hours begin (Daylight saving time) Mar 29 — Chamber of Commerce Mid - Winter Ball — Lafayette Club Apr 17 — Chamber Recognition Banquet July 17 -19 — Spirit of the Lakes Festival Sept 12 — Taste of the Lakes — Bayview Event Center Nov 20 — Tree Lighting Ceremony City Hall Closings Jan 21 Martin Luther King Day Feb 18 President's Day Absences Jan 27 -Feb 10 Kandis Hanson — vacation ?eb 20 -27 Kandis Hanson — vacation May 7 -9 Kandis Hanson — City Manager's conf �^ MOUND CITY COUNCIL MEETING ( January 8, 2008 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 8, 2008, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers David Osmek, Mike Specht, John Beise and Greg Skinner Others present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Ken Perbix, Amanda Schwarze Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting — Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Approve agenda MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. Consent agenda Specht requested the removal if item 31, Osmek requested the removal of 3A, and 3U, and Skinner requested the removal of item 3B. MOTION by Specht, seconded by Osemk to approve the consent agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. (removed) B. (removed) C. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -01: RESOLUTION APPOINTING COUNCILMEMBER OSMEK AS ACTING MAYOR FOR 2008 D. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -02: RESOLUTION APPOINTING FINANCE DIRECTOR GINO BUSINARO THE ACTING CITY MANAGER FOR 2008 E. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -03: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY CLERK F. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -04: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF AT LEAST A $20,000 BOND FOR THE CITY TREASURER/FINANCE DIRECTOR G. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -05: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR 2008 H. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -06: RESOLUTION APPOINTING PARKS SUPERINTENDENT JIM FACKLER AS ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR FOR 2008 I. (removed) -128- Mound City Council Minutes — January 8, 2008 J. Approve reappointment of Planning Commissioners (3 -year terms): Geoff Michael, Christine Ebert, and Michael Paulsen K. Approve appointment of Parks, Open Space and Docks Commissioner (3 -year term) Michael Wilkus L. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -07: RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE M. Approve Pay Request No. 2 by Kusske Construction in the amount of $27,011.97 for work on the 2007 Storm Drainage Project (PW- 07 -04) N. Approve Pay Request No. 9 and Final Pay Request by Hardrives, Inc. in the amount of $59,649.51 for the 2006 Street Improvement Project (PW- 06 -01) O. Approve Pay Request No. 1 from Widmer Construction in the amount of $15,580.24 for work on the Auditor's Road Surcharge Placement (PW- 08 -06) P. Approve Pay Request No. 1 by Widmer Construction in the amount of $121,309.56 for work on the Sinclair /Baywood Shores Lift Stations (PW- 07 -05) Q. Approve proposed 2008 Dock Location Map R. Approve request for kennel permit by Mound Police Department S. Approve "No U- Turn" signs, as submitted by Mound Police Department T. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -08: RESOLUTION MAKING A SELECTION NOT TO WAIVE THE STATUTORY TORT LIMITS FOR LIABILITY INSURANCE PURPOSES U. (removed) 3A. Approve minutes Osmek noted an added carriage return on page 5 of the Dec. 11 minutes. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Specht to approve the minutes of December 11, 2007 as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3B. Approve payment of claims MOTION by Specht, seconded by Beise to approve payment of claims in the amount of $1,106,248.47. Upon roll call vote, the following voted in favor: Osmek, Specht, Hanus and Beise. The following voted against: None. Skinner abstained from voting. Motion carried. 31. Adopt resolution appointing Councilmembers as Council representatives for 2008 Specht stated that with job time constraints he feels that another member should serve as liaison to the Parks, Open Space and Docks Commission, and recommended John Beise for this position. MOTION by Specht, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 08 -09: RESOLUTION APPOINTING COUNCILMEMBERS AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CITY COUNCIL -129- Mound City Council Minutes — January 8, 2008 3U. Approve application to conduct excluded bingo by Knights of Columbus Osmek indicated he would abstain from voting on this item because he is a member of the organization. MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to approve the application to conduct excluded bingo by the Knights of Columbus. The following voted in favor: Specht, Hanus, Beise and Skinner. The following voted against: None. Osmek abstained from voting. Motion carried. - 4. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda' Ken Perbix, Watertown, MN, thanked the Council for their consideration regarding his property. 5. Discussion /action on accepting credit card payments at City Hall Gino Businaro stated that the city receives numerous requests to pay by credit card and asked the Council for their input. Presently only the liquor store accepts credit cards. He stated that the cost to take credit cards is about 2 'h %. Hanus stated that this was brought up in the past and not approved due to added cost to the City. Businaro stated he would like to use one account for the entire city, including the liquor store, to get the best rate possible. Beise stated that previously when the city did accept credit cards, it was presented to the Council that a $50 utility bill costs the city $25 to process on a credit card, and that is simply not true. That's the deal that they were told they had and why they discontinued the credit card program. He suggested trying it for a year and track the charges so that it can be budgeted for in subsequent years if feasible. Osmek stated that if the surcharge could be picked up by the user, he'd be all for it, but without that, it would cost taxpayers a lot of money. Skinner feels that now a lot of people operate strictly with credit or debit cards and feels that we should offer that option. MOTION by Beise, seconded by Skinner to start accepting credit cards for 2008 and track the income and exact usage charges per department so that at year end Council can see what these expenses are. The following voted in favor: Beise and Skinner. The following voted against: Osmek, Specht and Hanus. Motion failed. 6. Discussion /action on a resolution designating official newspaper for 2008 Kandis stated that in previous years it was determined that if you have a newspaper in your community, that becomes your official newspaper. The Laker has not moved outside of Mound, which opens the door for other options. Osmek stated that being that the Laker does home delivery, along with price, makes him lean in their direction. -130- Mound City Council Minutes — January 8, 2008 MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Specht to adopt the following resolution (naming The Laker as the official newspaper for 2008). Skinner has issues with the errors that the Laker has made in the past and doesn't think their editor is as objective as he should be, and prefers to go with the Lakeshore Weekly. Hanus also agreed that there have been some problems with the Laker and Hanson stated that omissions have been a bigger problem that errors, especially when it comes to publication of public hearing notices which are required by law. Osmek asked if there have been problems within the last year and Hanson stated that there have been. Beise stated that the Laker does focus in on our community. Specht stated that people are used to looking in the Laker for city news. Hanus asked what the Laker will change to reduce the error level, and was surprised that errors /omissions were still occurring. John Dean stated that he believes that if the Council wanted to continue to review the situation, they could make an appointment of an official newspaper and indicate that they want to meet with the publisher to see how problems can be addressed. Osmek removed the above stated motion. Hanus suggested appointing the Laker as the interim but request that the Laker editor submit a plan to the city stating what they intend to do to better their service to the city, and primarily reduce the level of errors that have been experienced. MOTION by Specht to move forward with the Laker and after four or five issues we hear from staff that we're all on the same page and if issues aren't addressed have right to reconsider. Motion died for lack of a second. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Beise to approve the Laker as the temporary newspaper of record through March 31, 2008, at which time the Council will review with the Laker their remediation plan for making corrective actions as well as improving their accuracy and quality, with city staff providing examples of quality issues that need to be addressed and an action plan must be in place with the Laker to stop these from happening. Hanus asked if this motion does require a response from the Laker as to what their action plan is and Osmek stated that it did. John Dean suggested wording provisionally appointing the Laker as the official newspaper of the City, subject to an evaluation no later than the last meeting of March, 2008, at which time the Laker is to respond to a work plan for addressing specific concerns to be provided to them by City Staff. If the Council determines that their responses are inadequate, the Council reserves the right to consider terminating the appointment. Osmek withdrew his motion. -131- I Mound City Council Minutes — January 8, 2008 MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Specht to provisionally approve the Laker as newspaper of record for 2008 subject to reevaluation no later than the second Council meeting of March, at which time the Laker will respond with a remediation work plan to address city staff's concerns to be highlighted to the Laker specifically, and that the Council will determine at that second meeting subsequent action relating to extending the newspaper of record status or making a selection on a secondary at that time. All voted in favor of said motion. Motion carried. 7. Planning Commission recommendation Setback determination /assignment for house addition at 1729 Gull Lane Sarah Smith reviewed that the owner's contractor submitted a building permit application to do an upper -story remodel on lake side of the home. Staff didn't process, and subsequently denied the permit because it was determined that review by the Planning Commission and City Council was necessary to determine whether the setback along the west property line in the subject area qualifies as the "rear" or "side" according to City Code. Staff believes that the west setback is the "side ", and when the dormer permit was issued in 2004 Staff also determined it to be a "side ". The Planning Commission reviewed this request on December 17, 2007, and voted 3 in favor and 2 opposed to recommend that the Council deem the setback for the house to be a "rear'. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Specht to confirm with the Planning Commission's determination that the west lot is a "rear" lot line at 1729 Gull Lane. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 8. Information /Miscellaneous A. Reports: POSDC Minutes — December 13, 2007 B. Newsletter: Gillespie Center 9. Adjourn MOTION by Specht, seconded by Osmek to adjourn at 8:55 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -132- Mayor Mark Hanus JANUARY 22, 2008 CITY COUNCIL MEETING TOTAL $659,531.72 -133- 123107MANCKS $231,301.99 DEC 123107SUE3 $225,775.96 DEC 010708SUE $12,500.00 JAN 011608SUE $41156.70 JAN 012208SUE $185,797.07 JAN TOTAL $659,531.72 -133- r Refer 123107 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS -141- City of Mound 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 6 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $49.85 Refer 123107 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $719.00 Invoice 7138147 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $719.00 Refer 123107 H & L MESAS/ AGGREGATE CONS _ AP Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts FSE BLADES, BOLTS, NUTS, ETC $2,564.01 Invoice H -73449 12/31/2007 PO 20393 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $2,564.01 Refer 123107 HANSON, KANDIS AP Payment E 101 -41310 -331 Use of personal auto 2007 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT $812.38 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells 2007 DSL LINE $599.40 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,411.78 Refer 123107 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP AP Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts U- JOINTS BORED, SET SCREWS $810.98 Invoice 76962 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts SNOW BLOWER LITE TUBING $211.80 Invoice 76963 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts SKID STEER ATTACHMENT $55.63 Invoice 76970 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts SKID STEER ATTACHMENT $55.63 Invoice 76970 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts SKID STEER ATTACHMENT $55.63 Invoice 76970 -C 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,189.67 Refer 123107 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO AP Payment E 222 -42260 -418 Other Rentals 12 -07 RADIO LEASE $958.72 Invoice 27128033 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $958.72 Refer 123107 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I AP Payment G 101 -23089 MHR Phase II Auditors Road 12 -07 MHR PHASE II AUDITORS ROAD $2,231.75 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -07 MISC PLANNING $650.86 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 401 - 46540 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -07 GREENWAY PHASE II AUDITORS $195.00 ROAD Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3,077.61 Refer 123107 HOPPER, PAUL AP Payment E 101 - 42110 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 2007 FITNESS REIMBURSEMENT $50.00 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $50.00 Refer 123107 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS -141- _ City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 5 Refer 123107 CHADWICK, MERTZ, BLEDSAW AN AP Payment E 101 - 41600 -304 Legal Fees 12 -07 PROSECUTION SERVICES Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 101 - 41310 -440 Other Contractual Servic Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment E 609- 49750 -383 Gas Utilities 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5762358 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 12 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -383 Gas Utilities 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5765631 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 12 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE AP Payment E 101-42110-383 Gas Utilities 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5765631 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 12 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -383 Gas Utilities 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #6093897 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 _ Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 CHADWICK, MERTZ, BLEDSAW AN AP Payment E 101 - 41600 -304 Legal Fees 12 -07 PROSECUTION SERVICES Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 101 - 41310 -440 Other Contractual Servic 10 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE Invoice 89984 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 12 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE Invoice 90258 -D 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602- 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic 12 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE Invoice 90258 -E 12/31/2007 ,P Payment E 281 - 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic 12 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE invoice 90258 -F 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101- 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic 12 -07 COPIER MAINTENANCE Invoice 91921 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 41910 -200 Office Supplies TONER CARTRIDGE Invoice 91921 -B 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 DEPARTMENT NATURAL RESOUR AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 2007 WATER APPROPRIATION FEE Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 PO 20631 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107_ EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AP Payment G 101 -22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 12 -07 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE Invoice 336461 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 EXTREME BEVERAGE AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 622897 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 G & K SERVICES AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services 12 -18 -07 MATS Invoice 6540867 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 lefer 123107 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD AP Payment E 101 - 41310 -210 Operating Supplies 12 -26 -07 HOT AND COLD COOLER Invoice 6334191 12/31/2007 -140- Total $687.06 $290.53 $290.52 $359.99 $7,089.25 $6,159.21 $6,159.21 $396.00 $11.00 $11.00 $5.50 $396.00 $8.52 Total $828.02 $2,657.15 Total $2,657.15 $135.00 Total $135.00 $160.00 Total $160.00 $73.63 Total $73.63 $49.85 � r City of Mound \ Payments CITY OF MOUND 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 4 Refer 123107 CARG /L SALT DIVISION AP Payment Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment G 101 -23174 Woodlyn Ridge Development 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 WOODLYN RIDGE 12/31/2007 E 101 -41910 -383 Gas Utilities DEVELOPMENT Invoice 0112782 -A 12/31/2007 BULK ICE CONTROL AP Payment G 101 -23182 1760 Sumach Lane Public L 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 1760 SUMACH LANE AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -237 Deicing Salt PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT Invoice 0112782 -B 12/31/2007 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 PORT HARRISON Accounts Payable Refer 123107 DRAINAGE STUDY Invoice 0112783 12/31/2007 Project PW0704 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 HIGHLAND AREA Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0112784 12/31/2007 Project PW0704 AP Payment E 402 -43120 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 MSA SYSTEM UPDATE Invoice 0112785 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 101 -23077 Halstead Point #06 -02 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 HALSTEAD POINTE #06 -02 Invoice 0112786 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 BASSWOOD, TONKAWOOD DRAINAGE Invoice 0112787 12/31/2007 Project PWO803 AP Payment E 401 - 43108 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 2008 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0112788 12/31/2007 Project PWO801 AP Payment E 401 -43102 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 HARBOR LANE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0112789 12/31/2007 Project PW0806 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 CARG /L SALT DIVISION AP Payment E 101 -43100 -237 Deicing Salt BULK ICE CONTROL Invoice 2088953 12/31/2007 E 101 -41910 -383 Gas Utilities AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -237 Deicing Salt BULK ICE CONTROL Invoice 2086838 12/31/2007 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -237 Deicing Salt BULK ICE CONTROL Invoice 2088657 12/31/2007 E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable Refer 123107 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE) - AP Payment E 222 -42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair EXH FLEX TUBING Invoice 6974 -56299 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable Refer 123107 CENTERPOINT ENERGY AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 -41910 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 -49400 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 123107 12/3112007 20200 Total 20200 Total 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5714383 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5728173 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5731601 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5731601 11 -14 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 #5731601 -139- $852.00 $65.00 $436.50 $2,179.75 $390.00 $130.00 $3,688.25 $47,538.50 $5,776.00 $101,838.54 $2,693.90 $2,947.76 $3,521.06 $9,162.72 $27.50 $27.50 $1,216.57 $1,882.55 $787.34 $787.34 $787.35 City of Mound / •...► � Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 MONTHLY G 675 -16325 Distribution System Invoice 0112779 ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0112770 -C 12/31/2007 E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs AP Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 MONTHLY Invoice 0112780 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0112770 -D 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 601 -16300 Improvements Other Than BI 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 2355 CHATEAU WELL #3 PUMPHOUSE Invoice 0112771 12/31/2007 Project PW0608 AP Payment E 401 -43106 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0112772 12/31/2007 Project PWO602 AP Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 WCA Invoice 0112773 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 601 -16300 Improvements Other Than BI 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 WATER SYSTEM MODELING Invoice 0112774 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 602 -16325 Distribution System 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 I AND I ANALYSIS REPORT Invoice 0112775 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 602 -16325 Distribution System ivoice 0112776 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112777 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112777 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112777 -C 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112777 -D 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System Invoice 0112778 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System Invoice 0112779 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112780 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112780 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112780 -C 12/31/2007 ,P Payment E 401 - 43107 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0112781 12/31/2007 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 SINCLAIR, BAYWOOD LIFT STAT IONS Project PW0705 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 UPDATE STREET AND UTILITY MAP 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 UPDATE STREET AND UTILITY MAP 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 UPDATE STREET AND UTILITY MAP 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 UPDATE STREET AND UTILITY MAP 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 2280 COTTONWOOD DRAINAGE STUDY Project PWO604 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 WALNUT, RAMBLER, MAPLE ROAD DRAINAGE STUDY Project PW0704 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 HARBOR LANE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project PW0507 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 HARBOR LANE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project PW0507 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 HARBOR LANE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Project PWO507 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 2007 STREET IMPROVEMENTS -138- Project PW0701 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 3 $96.25 $96.25 $65.00 $442.50 $520.00 $596.50 $455.00 $1,455.87 $105.88 $105.88 $105.87 $105.87 $130.00 $5,177.00 $2,894.60 $2,894.60 $1,447.30 $8,671.67 r City of Mound 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 2 \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment G 602 -16325 Distribution System 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 SINCLAIR, $392.50 BAYWOOD LIFT STATIONS Invoice 0113007 12/31/2007 Project PW0705 AP Payment E 101 -43100 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 UPDATE STREET $250.25 AND UTILITY MAP Invoice 0113008 -A 12131/2007 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 UPDATE STREET $250.25 AND UTILITY MAP Invoice 0113008 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 UPDATE STREET $250.25 AND UTILITY MAP Invoice 0113008 -C 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 UPDATE STREET $250.25 AND UTILITY MAP Invoice 0113008 -D 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 WALNUT RAMBLER $262.50 MAPLE ROAD DRAINING STUDY Invoice 0113009 12/31/2007 Project PW0704 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 HARBOR LANE $574.40 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0113010 -A 12/31/2007 Project PW0507 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 HARBOR LANE $574.40 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0113010 -B 12/31/2007 Project PW0507 AP Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 HARBOR LANE $287.20 UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0113010 -C 12/31/2007 Project PW0507 AP Payment E 401 - 43107 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 2007 STREET $1,334.00 IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0113011 12/31/2007 Project PW0701 AP Payment G 601 -16325 Distribution System 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 HARRISON BAY $37.50 WATERMAIN Invoice 0113012 12/31/2007 Project PW0706 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 HIGHLAND AREA $455.00 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0113013 12/31/2007 Project PW0704 AP Payment E 402 -43120 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 MSA SYSTEM $130.00 UPDATE Invoice 0113014 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 BASSWOOD, $65.00 TONKAWOOD DRAINAGE Invoice 0113015 12/31/2007 Project PWO803 AP Payment E 401 -43108 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 2008 STREET $5,053.50 IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 011316 12/31/2007 Project PW0801 AP Payment E 401 -43102 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 HARBOR LANE $3,373.50 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 011307 12/31/2007 Project PWO806 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 MONTHLY $96.25 ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0112770 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -300 Professional Srvs 11 -17 -07 THRU 12 -14 -07 MONTHLY $96.25 ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0112770 -B 12/31/2007 -137- Refer 123107 BELLE PLAINS SAND AND GRAVE 4P Payment City of Mound 01/17/08 10:17 AM Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 PO 20377 Page 1 AP Payment I, Payments 10 -15 -07 WINTER BLEND SALT Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 PO 20377 CITY OF MOUND 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Current Period: December 2007 Batch Name 123107SUE3 User Dollar Amt $225,775.96 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 MONTHLY Payments Computer Dollar Amt $225,775.96 ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0113002 -A 12/31/2007 $0.00 In Balance AP Payment Refer 123107 ANDERSEN, EARL F., INCORPORA AP Payment E 101 -45000 -500 Capital Outlay FA SKATE PARK COMPONENT $2,939.97 Invoice 0090388 12/31/2007 PO 20515 E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs AP Payment G 101 -22807 Skate Park SKATE PARK COMPONENT $478.68 Invoice 0090388 12/31/2007 PO 20515 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $3,418.65 Refer 123107 ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS AP Payment E 401 - 46590 -300 Professional Srvs 01 -27 -07 THRU 11 -23 -07 PARKS AND P/W $1,020.00 G 601 -16300 Improvements Other Than BI FACILITY PREDESIGN Invoice 2007092- 00 -0 -8 12/3112007 Project 08900 Invoice 0113003 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $1,020.00 Refer 123107 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG_ _ AP Payment E 101 - 41310 -218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDER JACKET, RAHN $21.70 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $21.70 Refer 123107 BELLE PLAINS SAND AND GRAVE 4P Payment E 101 - 43100 -238 Concrete Sand 10 -15 -07 WINTER BLEND SALT Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 PO 20377 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -238 Concrete Sand 10 -15 -07 WINTER BLEND SALT Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 PO 20377 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 BOLTON AND MENK INCORPORA_ AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 MONTHLY ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0113002 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 MONTHLY ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0113002 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 MONTHLY ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0113002 -C 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 MONTHLY ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS Invoice 0113002 -D 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 601 -16300 Improvements Other Than BI 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 2355 CHATEAU WELL #3 PUMPHOUSE Invoice 0113003 12/31/2007 Project PW0608 AP Payment E 401 - 43106 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 2006 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 0113004 12/31/2007 Project PW0601 AP Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 WCA ADMINISTRATION Invoice 0113005 12/31/2007 4P Payment G 602 -16325 Distribution System 12 -15 -07 THRU 12 -31 -07 I AND I ANALYSIS REPORT Invoice 0113006 12/31/2007 -136- $192.39 $249.41 $441.80 $35.25 $35.25 $35.25 $35.25 $175.00 $507.50 $80.00 $780.00 6 � City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 Fund Summary $231,301.99 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $231,301.99 Total $231,301.99 -135- 01/09/08 1:54 PM Page 2 20200 Accounts Payable 101 GENERAL FUND $7,750.71 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $75,229.75 602 SEWER FUND $121,309.56 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $27,011.97 $231,301.99 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $231,301.99 Total $231,301.99 -135- 01/09/08 1:54 PM Page 2 -134- _ City of Mound 01/09/08 1:54 PM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 Batch Name 123107MANCKS User Dollar Amt $231,301.99 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $231,301.99 $0.00 In Balance Refer 123107 CASH, PETTY CASH AP Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies REPLENISH PETTY CASH, MISCELLANEOUS $380.67 ITEMS Invoice 123107 -B 12/31/2007 PO 20325 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $380.67 Refer 123107 GRADY, DANIEL AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 123107 12/3112007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $150.00 Refer 123107 HARDRIVES, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 401 - 43106 -500 Capital Outlay FA FINAL PAY REQUEST 2007 STREET $59,649.51 IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Project PW0601 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $59,649.51 Refer 123107 JOHNSON, TIM AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 2007 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $150.00 Refer 123107 KUSSKE CONSTRUCTION COMPA AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System REQUEST #2 STORM DRAINAGE $27,011.97 IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Project PW0704 Transaction Date 12/3112007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $27,011.97 Refer 123107 SPRINT WIRELESS _ AP Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 11 -19 -07 THRU 12 -18 -07 CELL PHONES $847.63 Invoice 924573317 -073 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $847.63 Refer 123107 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC AP Payment E 401 - 43102 -500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #1 HARBOR LANE STREET $15,580.24 IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Project PWO806 AP Payment G 602 -16325 Distribution System PAY REQUEST #1 SINCLAIR RD /BAYWOOD $121,309.56 SHORES LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Project PW0705 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $136,889.80 Refer 123107 XCEL ENERGY AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities 12 -07 #51- 4802601 -1 $6,222.41 Invoice 205060866 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $6,222.41 -134- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 1 Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment E 450 -46388 -300 Professional Srvs CREDIT — RIBBON Invoice 217603 -A 12/31/2007 E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs AP Payment G 101 -22810 X -Mas Donation /Expense HOLIDAY LIGHTS Invoice 722595 12/31/2007 09 -01 -07 AUDITORS ROAD UTILITIES AP Payment G 101 -22810 X -Mas Donation /Expense HOLIDAY LIGHTS Invoice 217627 12/31/2007 Invoice 767938 -C 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 LAKER NEWSPAPER 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 401 - 43108 -500 Capital Outlay FA 09 -01 -07 PUBLIC HEARING 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 7 - $40.83 $346.06 $247.26 Total $552.49 $38.69 Invoice 767937 12/31/2007 Project PW0801 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs 09 -01 -07 AUDITORS ROAD UTILITIES Invoice 767938 -A 12/31/2007 Project PW0507 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs 09 -01 -07 AUDITORS ROAD UTILITIES Invoice 767938 -B 12/31/2007 Project PW0507 AP Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs 09 -01 -07 AUDITORS ROAD UTILITIES Invoice 767938 -C 12/31/2007 Project PW0507 AP Payment G 675 -16325 Distribution System 09 -01 -07 STORM SEWER DRAIN BIDS Invoice 767939 12/31/2007 Project PW0704 AP Payment _ E 101 - 41110 -351 Legal Notices Publishing 12 -22 -07 TEMP SIGNS Invoice 799323 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101- 42110 -351 Legal Notices Publishing 12 -2 -207 #13 -2007 ADMIN OFFENSES nvoice 799327 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 -42400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing 12 -22 -07 LAND USE FEES Invoice 799328 12/31/2007 AP Payment G 101 -23174 Woodlyn Ridge Development 12 -22 -07 PUBLIC HEARING Invoice 800568 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing 11 -10 -07 #12 -2007 METER ORDINANCE Invoice 788143 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -351 Legal Notices Publishing 11 -10 -07 #12 -2007 METER ORDINANCE Invoice 788143 -B 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 LAKER/PIONEER NEWSPAPER AP Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising 12 -08 -07 HAPPY HOLIDAYS AD Invoice 795423 12/31/2007 PO 20573 AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising 12 -15 -07 HAPPY HOLIDAYS AD Invoice 797327 12/31/2007 PO 20573 AP Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising 12 -22 -07 HOLIDAY GREETINGS SECTION AD Invoice 795644 12/31/2007 PO 20573 AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising 12 -29 -07 UP DRINK DRIVE RESPONSIBLY Invoice 800134 12/31/2007 PO 20573 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 LARSON PRINTING AND GRAPHIC Hr raymenr t uz -4z26o -200 Office Supplies NCR FORMS Invoice 16741 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 ry Refer 123107 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC AP Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Invoice 6383512 12/31/2007 -142- $188.60 $188.60 $94.30 $515.86 $70.61 $69.33 $83.58 $46.09 $33.83 $33.83 $1,363.32 $175.00 $175.00 $176.80 $49.00 $575.80 $223.09 Total $223.09 $32.88 City of Mound �� \\ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 Transaction Date 12/3112007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 8 Total $32.88 AP Payment E 281 - 45210 -361 General Liability Ins VILLA DOCKS Invoice 26956 12/31/2007 E 609- 49750 -265 Freight 12 -20 -07 DELIVERY CHARGE Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 000619 12/31/2007 10 -08 -07 THRU 01 -02 -08 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Pavable 20200 Total Refer 123107 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 12 -17 -07 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 20226 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight 12 -20 -07 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 20254 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 12 -28 -07 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 20285 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 METRO SALES, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 101 - 42400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 10 -08 -07 THRU 01 -02 -08 Invoice 274741 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 -43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 10 -08 -07 THRU 01 -02 -08 Invoice 274741 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 10 -08 -07 THRU 01 -02 -08 Invoice 274741 -C 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 10 -08 -07 THRU 01 -02 -08 Invoice 274741 -D 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SAC C AP Payment G 602 -21825 SAC Deposits 12 -07 SAC CHARGES Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 MEYER, WILLIAM AP Payment R 101- 48100 -38060 Center Point Franchis 2007 REFUND 2ND GAS METER Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 M/NNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 12 -24 -07 WINDOW WASH Invoice 113044430 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12131/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 12208 MINNESOTA DEPT NATURAL RES AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -400 Repairs& Maintenance 2008 AQUATIC NUISANCE MANAGEMENT PERMITM Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/8/2008 Due 1/8/2008 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT -143- $1,255.00 $1,255.00 $19.99 $19.99 $74.80 $240.90 $182.60 $498.30 $23.63 $23.63 $23.62 $23.62 $94.50 $8,921.25 $8,921.25 $24.00 $24.00 $64.97 $64.97 $315.00 $315.00 6 CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments A 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 9 -144- $840.00 $1,329.00 $8,272.75 $10,441.75 $1,044.76 $635.75 $1,680.51 $9.26 $9.26 $9.26 $27.78 $22.47 $22.48 $44.95 $4,715.00 $4,715.00 $28.87 $109.22 $38.39 $176.48 $30.42 $30.42 $167.00 Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment E 222 -42260 -180 Fire -Drill Pay 12 -07 DRILLS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -185 Fire - Maintenance Pay 12 -07 MAINTENANCE Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -190 Fire - Monthly Salaries 12 -07 WAGE REPORT Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS AP Payment E 101 -43100 -238 Concrete Sand 12 -26 -07 CONCRETE Invoice 139910 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -238 Concrete Sand 12 -31 -07 CONCRETE Invoice 139950 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 OFFICE DEPOT AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -200 Office Supplies CALENDAR, PINS Invoice 412688605 -001 -1 12/31/2007 PO 20396 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -200 Office Supplies CALENDAR, PINS Invoice 412688605 -001 -1 12/31/2007 PO 20396 AP Payrf ent -E 101 -43100 -200 Office Supplies CALENDAR, PINS Invoice 412688605 -001 -1 12/31/2007 PO 20396 �^ Date "ransaction 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -395 Gopher One -Call 12 -07 LOCATES Invoice 7120694 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602- 49450 -395 Gopher One -Call 12 -07 LOCATES Invoice 7120694 -A 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 PANNE MASONRY AP Payment E 401 -43107 -500 Capital Outlay FA EDGEWATER, ARBOR LANE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Project PW0706 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 PERRY'S TRUCK REPAIR AP Payment E 101 -45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 12 -01 -07 MOTOR SELINIOD Invoice 34254 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 12 -01 -07 REPAIR PLOW Invoice 34282 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101- 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 12 -28 -07 #105 TURN SIGNAL Invoice 34599 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals AIR AND OXYGEN Invoice 817489 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL, MOUND AP Payment E 222 -42260 -305 Medical Services 12 -19 -07 IMMUNIZATIONS, GOTTSCHALK Invoice 247774 12/31/2007 -144- $840.00 $1,329.00 $8,272.75 $10,441.75 $1,044.76 $635.75 $1,680.51 $9.26 $9.26 $9.26 $27.78 $22.47 $22.48 $44.95 $4,715.00 $4,715.00 $28.87 $109.22 $38.39 $176.48 $30.42 $30.42 $167.00 -145- _ City of Mound 01/17/08 10:17 AM Payments Page 10 / CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $167.00 Refer 123107 RIDGEVIEW MEDICAL, WACONIA AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -305 Medical Services 2007 HS ANNUAL MAINTENANCE $125.00 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $125.00 Refer 123107 SMALL ENGINE REPAIR (SES) - AP Payment E 285 - 46388 -500 Capital Outlay FA BLOWER, PARKING DECK 1 $533.24 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $533.24 Refer 123107 STS CONSULTANTS _ AP Payment E 450 - 46388 -300 Professional Srvs THRU 12 -28 -07 TRANSIT PARKING DECK 1 $74.50 Invoice C7221 12/31/2007 Project 06001 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $74.50 Refer 123107 T- MOBILE CELL PHONE AP Payment E 281 -45210 -321 Telephone & Cells 12 -03 -07 THRU 01 -02 -08 CELL PHONE $45.52 Invoice 123107 -B 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $45.52 Refer 123107 TOLL GAS AND WELDING SUPPLY AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials CARBON DIOXIDE SIPHON CYL $17.76 Invoice 198944 -A 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -230 Shop Materials CARBON DIOXIDE SIPHON CYL $17.76 Invoice 198944 -B 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials CARBON DIOXIDE SIPHON CYL $17.76 Invoice 198944 -C 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $5128 Refer 123107 TRUE VALUE, MOUND AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $60.99 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 450 - 46388 -500 Capital Outlay FA 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $66.52 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Project 06001 AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $48.97 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $18.92 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $16.88 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $68.41 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.93 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -230 Shop Materials 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.93 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $52.40 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 -49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $48.64 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 -145- � r City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Invoice 123107 12/3112007 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts 12 -07 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 UHL COMPANY INSPECTION AP Payment E 101-41910-401 Building Repairs REPAIR COLD AIR DUCT VENT Invoice 32270 12/31/2007 12 -03 -07 4397 WILSHIRE BLVD Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 VERIZON WIRELESS (FIRE /MANA Accounts Payable 20200 AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells 12 -04 -07 THRU 01 -03 -09 CELL PHONES Invoice 1803634145 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells 12 -04 -07 THRU 01 -03 -09 CELL PHONES �— Invoice 1803634145 12/31/2007 ransaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 VIDEOTRONIX, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 101 - 42110 -220 Repair /Maint Supply REPAIR VIDEO CAMERA Invoice SVM2717477 12/31/2007 PO 20317 Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 WALDRON AND ASSOCIATES AP Payment E 222 -42260 -308 Building Inspection Fees 11 -07 FIRE INSPECTIONS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 222 -42260 -308 Building Inspection Fees 12 -07 FIRE INSPECTIONS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees 10 -07 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees 11 -07 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees 12 -07 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Invoice 123107 12/3112007 AP Payment E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees 11 -21 -07 4397 WILSHIRE BLVD RENTAL INSPECTION Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees 12 -03 -07 4397 WILSHIRE BLVD Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 Transaction Date 12131/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 WELCH, BRIAN AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -305 Medical Services 2007 SAFETY LENS REIMBURSEMENT nvoice 123107 12/31/2007 ransaction Date 12131/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Refer 123107 WHELAN DAVIS COMPANY, INCO -146- 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 11 $15.96 $51.31 $26.96 $4.88 $3.39 Total $546.09 $353.00 Total $353.00 $0.66 $73.08 Total $73.74 $170.00 Total $170.00 $438.75 $568.75 $16,201.07 $4,410.78 $16,116.81 $40.00 $20.00 Total $37,796.16 $262.50 Total $262.50 City of Mound •.rr. � Payments 1 CITY OF MOUND 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 12 Refer 123107 WINKLER, 808 $767.00 $767.00 $1,462.50 $1,115.00 $1,415.00 $1,705.00 $5,697.50 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -238 Concrete Sand Current Period: December 2007 AP Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance REPAIR GARAGE HEATERS Invoice 8458 12/31/2007 PO 20316 _ Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Accounts Payable 20200 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 12 -13 -07 CURB STOP Invoice 2111 12/31/2007 12 -07 #51- 6002836 -0 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 12 -18 -07 EDGEWATER CURB STOP Invoice 2108 12/31/2007 12 -07 #51- 6002835 -9 AP Payment E 601- 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 12 -26 -07 THREE POINTS AND CANARY _ Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 WATERMAIN Invoice 2137 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 601 - 49400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 12 -18 -07 EDGEWATER GATEVALVE Invoice 2109 12/31/2007 _ Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 123107 WINKLER, 808 $767.00 $767.00 $1,462.50 $1,115.00 $1,415.00 $1,705.00 $5,697.50 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -238 Concrete Sand 12 -27 -07 SAND $2,851.20 Invoice 123107 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -237 Deicing Salt 12 -27 -07 SALT $1,771.32 Invoice 123WZ — 12/31/2007 _ Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $4,622.52 Refer 13107 XCEL ENERGY AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities 12 -07 #51- 6002836 -0 $354.11 Invoice 205978489 12/31/2007 AP Payment E 101 - 42115 -381 Electric Utilities 12 -07 #51- 6002835 -9 $23.51 Invoice 205675036 12/31/2007 _ Transaction Date 12/31/2007 Due 12/31/2007 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $377.62 -147- _ .�.s CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 285 MOUND HRA 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 450 Parking Deck 1 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND City of Mound Payments I Current Period: December 2007 20200 Accounts Payable $80,842.39 $13,272.17 $1,306.02 $533.24 $78,665.86 $520.00 $100.19 $14,419.24 $17,474.94 $2,815.63 $15,826.28 $225,775.96 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $225,775.96 Total $225,775.96 01/17/08 10:17 AM Page 13 City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Batch Name 010708SUE User Dollar Amt $12,500.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $12,500.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 10708 FINANCIAL NETWORK INCORPOR Cash Payment E 475 - 46386 -500 Capital Outlay FA HOM ERNEST MONEY Invoice 010708 1/7/2008 Transaction Date 1/4/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 10708 MOUND CRIME PREVENTION Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow Invoice 010708 1/7/2008 Transaction Date 1/3/2008 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 475 TIF 1 -3 Mound Harbor Renaissan #1220019655 WIRE TRANSFER, 4M Wells Fargo 10100 Total 10100 Wells Fargo $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $12,500.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $12,500.00 Total $12,500.00 -149- 01/07/08 11:23 AM Page 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 011608SUE Payments City of Mound Payments I Current Period: January 2008 User Dollar Amt $4,156.70 Computer Dollar Amt $4,156.70 I -150- 01/16/08 1:28 PM Page 1 $1,007.70 $452.61 $247.66 $559.85 $559.85 $559.86 $19.60 $698.57 Total $4,105.70 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 Total $51.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 11608 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -321 Telephone & Cells— 01=08 TELEPHONE SERVICE Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 (�'- ransaction Date 1/7/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 11608 LAKE MINNETONKA CHAMBER CO Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -431 Meeting Expense 01 -17 -08 GENERAL MEMBERSHIP LUNCHEON, COLOTTI Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 PO 20574 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -431 Meeting Expense 01 -17 -08 GENERAL MEMBERSHIP LUNCHEON,HANSON,K Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 PO 20574 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -431 Meeting Expense 01 -17 -08 GENERAL MEMBERSHIP LUNCHEON, BUSINARO Invoice 011608 1/16/2008 PO 20574 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 I -150- 01/16/08 1:28 PM Page 1 $1,007.70 $452.61 $247.66 $559.85 $559.85 $559.86 $19.60 $698.57 Total $4,105.70 $17.00 $17.00 $17.00 Total $51.00 City of Mound 01/16108 1:28 PM Page 2 Payments _ L CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND Current Period: January 2008 10100 Wells Fargo $2,073.76 $247.66 $559.85 $559.86 $715.57 $4,156.70 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $4,156.70 Total $4,156.70 -151- r _. City of Mound / Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Batch Name 012208SUE User Dollar Amt $185,797.07 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $185,797.07 $0.00 In Balance Refer 12208 AMERICAN TEST CENTER, INCOR Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -300 Professional Srvs #17 TRUCK TESTED AND INSPECTED Invoice 2080079 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 AMUNDSON, M. LLP 01/17/08 10:05 AM Page 1 $900.00 Total $900.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -256 Tobacco Products For R CIGARETTES $639.35 Invoice 30107 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $639.35 Refer 12208 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $85.71 Invoice 438800206 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/15/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85.71 Refer 12208 BANYON DATA SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 101- 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic 2008 SOFTWARE_ SUPPORT Invoice 142498 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 43374900 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 43374900 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 01 -09 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 43374900 -B 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 43310800 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 01 -02 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 43310800 -B 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE Invoice 80305500 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 01 -02 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 80305500 -B 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE Invoice 690393 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 690408 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/15/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 CARGIL SALT DIVISION Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -237 Deicing Salt BULK ICE CONTROL nvoice 2097481 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -237 Deicing Salt BULK ICE CONTROL Invoice 2096300 1/22/2008 -152- Total Total $2,345.17 $2,345.17 $1,575.75 $1,183.55 $11.00 $1,554.60 $16.50 $42.52 $3.71 $4,387.63 $60.95 $80.95 Total $141.90 $718.05 $1,373.70 City of Mound 01/17/08 10:05 AM �- Payments Page 2 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,091.75 Refer 12208 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/W) Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts HALOGEN BULB $15.88 Invoice 6974 -57377 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.88 Refer 12208 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -08 COPIER MAINTENANCE $13.75 Invoice 92188 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -08 COPIER MAINTENANCE $2.75 Invoice 92188 -B 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -08 COPIER MAINTENANCE $2.75 Invoice 92188 -C 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -08 COPIER MAINTENANCE $2.75 Invoice 92188 -D 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -08 COPIER MAINTENANCE $2.75 Invoice 92188 -E 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -08 COPIER MAINTENANCE $2.75 Invoice 92188 -F 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -200 Office Supplies FAX MODEM $492.58 Invoice 92019 -A 1/22/2008 PO 20621 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -200 Office Supplies FAX MODEM $98.51 Invoice 92019 -B 1/22/2008 PO 20621 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -200 Office Supplies FAX MODEM $98.51 Invoice 92019 -C 1/22/2008 PO 20621 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -200 Office Supplies FAX MODEM $98.51 Invoice 92019 -D 1/22/2008 PO 20621 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -200 Office Supplies FAX MODEM $98.51 Invoice 92019 -E 1/22/2008 PO 20621 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -200 Office Supplies FAX MODEM $98.51 Invoice 92019 -F 1/22/2008 PO 20621 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,012.63 Refer 12208 CRIME PREVENTION MINNESOTA Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2008 MEMBERSHIP DUES, KURTZ $45.00 Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20320 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2008 MEMBERSHIP DUES, HUGHES $45.00 Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20320 Transaction Date 1/8/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $90.00 Refer 12208 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $278.90 Invoice 441576 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $38.80 Invoice 441577 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $246.00 Invoice 441754 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $67.50 Invoice 441754 -B 1122/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $58.00 Invoice 440882 1/22/2008 -153- i 1 _ City of Mound 01/17/0810:05 AM Payments Page 3 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $902.90 Invoice 440881 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $104.00 Invoice 6821 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $779.25 Invoice 440121 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $720.00 Invoice 440392 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,195.35 Refer 12208 ERVIN, DEREK R. Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -431 Meeting Expense 01 -09 -08 REIMBURSE SEMINAR $22.86 Invoice 012208 1122/2008 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.86 Refer 12208 FIRE CONTROL EXTINGUISHER Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -220 Repair /Maint Supply FIRE EXTINGUISHER $108.81 Invoice 43839 1/22/2008 Project 06001 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.81 Refer 12208 FOREST RESOURCES, DEPART O Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -430 Miscellaneous TREE INSPECTION TRAINING, GUSTAFSON $98.25 /'Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20528 ransaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $98.25 Refer 12208 FULLERTON BUILDING CENTER Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -500 Capital Outlay FA #08 -156 DECK REPLACEMENT $3,417.64 Invoice 2114475 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/8/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,417.64 Refer 12208 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services 01 -01 -08 MATS $108.74 Invoice 6558644 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -08 -08 UNIFORMS $65.32 Invoice 6567567 -A 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -08 -08 UNIFORMS $34.93 Invoice 6567567 -B 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -08 -08 UNIFORMS $37.53 Invoice 6567567 -C 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials 01 -08 -08 MATS $39.60 Invoice 6567567 -D 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -230 Shop Materials 01 -08 -08 MATS $39.60 Invoice 6567567 -E 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials 01 -08 -08 MATS $39.60 Invoice 6567567 -F 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -15 -08 UNIFORMS $18.63 Invoice 6576518 -A 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies 01 -15 -08 MATS $64.94 Invoice 6576518 -B 1/22/1980 ;ash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -01 -08 UNIFORMS $18.14 invoice 6558646 -A 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies 01 -01 -08 MATS $55.72 Invoice 6558646 -B 1/22/1980 -154- City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND 01/17/08 10:05 AM Page 4 Current Period: January 2008 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -01 -08 UNIFORMS Invoice 6558642 -A 1/22/1980 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -01 -08 UNIFORMS Invoice 6558642 -B 1/22/1980 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -01 -08 UNIFORMS Invoice 6558642 -C 1/22/1980 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials 01 -01 -08 MATS Invoice 6558642 -D 1/22/1980 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -230 Shop Materials 01 -01 -08 MATS Invoice 6558642 -E 1/22/1980 WINE Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials 01 -01 -08 MATS Invoice 6558642 -F 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 01 -08 -07 UNIFORMS Invoice 6567568 -A 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies 01 -08 -08 MATS Invoice 6567568 -6 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -460 Janitorial Services 01 -15 -08 MATS Invoice 6576517 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services 01 -01 -08 MATS Invoice 6558643 1/22/1980 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services 01 -01 -08 MATS Invoice 6558640 1/22/1980 Transaction Date 1/7/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 12208 GRANGERS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 1048655283 1/22/2008 PO 20629 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Refer 12208 GRAND PERE WINES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 00020561 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Refer 12208 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 97173 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 97054 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Refer 12208 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 718318 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 718318 -b 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 715875 1/2212008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 715876 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 718320 1/22/2008 GAS TANKS $54.67 $34.93 $37.53 $44.50 $44.50 $44.51 $15.18 $53.84 $185.63 $156.05 $53.23 $1,247.32 $80.79 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.79 WINE $446.21 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $446.21 WINE $1,457.50 WINE $1,099.75 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,557.25 LIQUOR $794.12 MIX $29.71 LIQUOR $3,797.06 WINE $852.00 WINE $975.06 -155- r City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 718319 1/22/2008 #08 -157 DEIONIZED WATER TESTER Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE Invoice 5548299 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -431 Meeting Expense 01 -09 -08 REIMBURSE SEMINAR Invoice 012208 112212008 #08 -157 DEIONIZED WATER TESTER Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 HACH COMPANY Transaction Date 01/17/08 10:05 AM Page 5 $26.44 Total $6,474.39 $16.00 Total $16.00 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA #08 -157 DEIONIZED WATER TESTER CARRYING CASE Invoice 5548299 1/22/2008 PO 20626 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA #08 -157 DEIONIZED WATER TESTER Invoice 5540908 1/22/2008 PO 20618 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 12208 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CLAMPS, PLUGS, ETC. Invoice 6560204 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 — Total Refer 12208 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP /'ash Payment E 281 -45210 -220 Repair /Maint Supply FORM CHANNEL 10 GALLON MATERIAL nvoice 012208 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 12208 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment G 101 -23174 Woodlyn Ridge Development WOODLYN DEV #07 -28/29 Invoice 2007 -99 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 12208 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 441184 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/1612008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 12208 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -202 Duplicating and copying 01 -27 -08 THRU 04 -26 -08 RENT Invoice 75315598 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 12208 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT —WINE Invoice 3665417 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT — LIQUOR Invoice 365354 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1378306 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1378307 1/22/2008 'ash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1378308 1/22/2008 -156- $45.71 $1,094.92 $1,140.63 $649.03 $649.03 $340.61 $340.61 $160.00 $160.00 $247.35 $247.35 $106.23 $106.23 - $196.00 - $14.39 $1,519.80 $1,947.65 $27.49 City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1378309 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1375639 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1375640 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT - -WINE Invoice 364447 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -430 Miscellaneous CANDY FOR KIDS Invoice 011508 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -500 Capital Outlay FA SOAP, PARKING RAMP I Invoice 010908 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 LUBE TECH, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts PLASTIC DRUM Invoice 1492073 -A 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts PLASTIC DRUM Invoice 1492073 -B 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts PLASTIC DRUM Invoice 1492073 -C 1122/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials PLASTIC DRUM Invoice 1490252 -A 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -230 Shop Materials PLASTIC DRUM Invoice 1490252 -B 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials PLASTIC DRUM Invoice 1490252 -C 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts ANTIFREEZE, EXXON NOTU Invoice 1489474 -A 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts ANTIFREEZE, EXXON NOTU Invoice 1489474 -B 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts ANTIFREEZE, EXXON NOTU Invoice 1489474 -C 1/22/2008 PO 20617 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 MARK Vll DISTRIBUTOR _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 278791 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 276545 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 276544 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 MEAGHER, BR/AN/TERI Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -37144 Sales of Meters & Re REFUND WATER METER Invoice 6504 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/15/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE -157- 01/17/08 10:05 AM Page 6 $9,392.88 $152.25 $59.90 -$5.83 Total $12,883.75 $5.87 $5.93 Project 06001 Total $11.80 $75.66 $75.66 $75.65 $267.49 $267.49 $267.49 $791.57 $791.57 $791.58 Total $3,404.16 $733.50 $1,885.10 $0.01 Total $2,618.61 $200.00 Total $200.00 , L r -158- City of Mound 01/17/08 10:05 AM / Payments Page 7 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS 02 -08 WASTEWATER $47,055.32 Invoice 684244 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/7/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47,055.32 Refer 12208 MINNESOTA DEPT NATURAL RES Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -400 Repairs & Maintenance TREATMENT CONTROL PONDWEED $315.00 Invoice 012208 1122/2008 Transaction Date 1/17/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $315.00 Refer 12208 MINNESOTA PUBLISHING Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising 01 -08 AD LAKE AREA BUSINESS $99.00 Invoice 8932 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/15/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer 12208 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSO Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training 2007 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, ST. $150.00 CLOUD, SKINNER Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20623 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training 2007 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, ST. $150.00 CLOUD, STRICKLEN Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20623 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training 2007 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, ST. — $150.00 CLOUD, NELSON anvoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20623 l Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -434 Conference & Training 2007 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, ST. $150.00 CLOUD, WEBER Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20623 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training 2007 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, ST. $150.00 CLOUD,HANSON,R Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20623 Transaction Date 1/7/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $750.00 Refer 12208 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples COLIFORM, MF - WATER $77.50 Invoice 381973 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.50 Refer 12208 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO Cash Payment E 895 - 49990 -124 Fire Pens Contrib 01 -08 FIRE RELIEF $10,800.00 Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/15/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,800.00 Refer 12208 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -412 Building Rentals 02 -08 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE $811.75 Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $811.75 Refer 12208 NAPA GUINE PARTS COMPANY Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs DOORGUARD $9.14 Invoice 6937812 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9.14 Refer 12208 'i NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPP Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply METERS, COUPLINGS, ETC $2,132.41 Invoice S01125937 -001 1/22/2008 PO 20624 -158- City of Mound Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 OFFICE DEPOT 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies TONER CARTRIDGE Invoice 413942773 -001 1/22/2008 PO 20652 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -200 Office Supplies LABELS, ADDRESS Invoice 413858281 -001 1/22/2008 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -200 Office Supplies WALL CALENDAR Invoice 413942496 -001 1/2212008 PO 20614 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -200 Office Supplies INKJET CARTRIDGE Invoice 414861998 -001 1/22/2008 PO 20524 Transaction Date 1/8/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMP Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE 1/10/2008 Invoice 8172112 -A 1/22/2008 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 01 -14 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 8172112 -B 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8171031 -A 1/22/2008 MIX Invoice 2558233 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight 01 -02 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE— Invoice 8171031 -B 1122/2008 1122/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT -WINE Invoice 8171845 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT - -WINE Invoice 8176148 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight CREDIT -- DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 8171648 -B 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 817559 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 01 -08 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 817559 -B 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8171471 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 01 -07 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 8171471 -B 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8171329 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 01 -07 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 8171329 -B 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12208 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2558231 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2558232 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 2558233 . 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT - -WINE Invoice 3374125 1122/2008 -159- Total Total 01/17/08 10:05 AM Page 8 $2,132.41 $78.81 $5.92 $19.16 $105.38 $209.27 $780.98 $9.00 $653.85 $9.00 - $10.00 - $87.00 -$1.75 $1,095.00 $26.00 $1,647.50 $30.00 $87.00 $1.75 Total $4,241.33 $1,244.70 $3,192.45 $0.00 -$9.33 r City Of Mound 01/17/0810:05 AM Payments Page 9 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,427.82 Refer 12208 PROTECTION ONE Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -28 -08 THRU 04 -27 -08 FIRE MONITORING $142.14 Invoice 012208 12/2212008 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -28 -08 THRU 04 -27 -08 FIRE MONITORING $49.13 Invoice 012208 12/2212008 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -28 -08 THRU 04 -27 -08 FIRE MONITORING $49.13 Invoice 012208 12/22/2008 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic 01 -28 -08 THRU 04 -27 -08 FIRE MONITORING $49.13 Invoice 012208 12/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/7/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $289.53 Refer 12208 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $596.88 Invoice 957314 -00 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $422.89 Invoice 957322 -00 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $136.00 Invoice 954728 -00 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $T,439.9(3- Invoice 954796 -00 1/22/2008 !� "ransaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,595.67 Refer 12208 STAR TRIBUNE NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2008 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION $223.08 Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20318 Transaction Date 1/8/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $223.08 Refer 12208 STS CONSULTANTS Cash Payment E 450 - 46388 -300 Professional Srvs THRU 01 -04 -08 TRANSIT PARKING DECK 1 $4,250.00 Invoice N26096 1/22/2008 Project 06001 Transaction Date 1/15/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,250.00 Refer 12208 SWARTZER, BRIAN Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -430 Miscellaneous 01 -09 -08 REIMBURSE SEMINAR $14.69 Invoice 012208 1122/2008 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14.69 Refer 12208 TAYLOR, J.J. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,408.37 Invoice 1135526 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $871.55 Invoice 1135483 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,279.92 Refer 12208 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE C Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -500 Capital Outlay FA BRUSH FOR RAMP SWEEPER $815.88 Invoice 94800014 1/22/2008 PO 20395 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -500 Capital Outlay FA RIDER SWEEPER FOR RAMP $30,619.19 Invoice 94800013 1/22/2008 PO 20395 transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31,435.07 Refer 12208 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN -160- Refer 12208 WINE COMPANY -161- City of Mound —"�• 01/17/08 10:05 AM -- -"" Payments Page 10 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale CREDIT –BEER - $120.00 Invoice 57836 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,723.35 Invoice 475769 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $51.70 Invoice 475763 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale CREDIT –BEER - $22.20 Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $616.00 Invoice 57729 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $472.95 Invoice 475006 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $64.40 Invoice 475005 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,332.05 Invoice 47443 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $72.05 Invoice 474412 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $531.00 Invoice 474414 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,721.30 12208 TR COMPUTER SALES, LLC _Refer Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 2008 PERMITS ANNUAL SUPPORT $1,007.94 Invoice 21120 1/2211980 Transaction Date 1/7/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,007.94 Refer 12208 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE AND SUP_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $585.00 Invoice 201000 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/14/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $585.00 Refer 12208 TRI- COUNTYASSOCIATION Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2008 MEMBERSHIP DUES $60.00 Invoice 012208 1/22/2008 PO 20321 Transaction Date 1/8/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.00 Refer 12208 VERIZON WIRELESS (PARKS) _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -321 Telephone & Cells 01 -09 CELL PHONES $217.97 Invoice 1804817654 1/22/2008 Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone 01 -09 CELL PHONES, ERVIN $6.13 Invoice 1804817654 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $224.10 Refer 12208 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $280.00 Invoice 6486 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 01 -10 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE $5.00 Invoice 6486 -B 1/22/2008 _ Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $285.00 Refer 12208 WINE COMPANY -161- I Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $185,797.07 Total $185,797.07 -162- City of Mound 01/17/08 10:05 AM Page 11 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2008 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $760.00 Invoice 184317 -00 -A 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight 01 -20 -08 DELIVERY CHARGE $8.05 Invoice 184317 -00 -B 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1110/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $768.05 Refer 12208 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,375.00 Invoice 217392 1/22/2008 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $500.00 Invoice 216855 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/10/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,875.00 Refer 12208 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials CLEANER $39.04 Invoice 57284944 -A 1122/2008 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -230 Shop Materials CLEANER $39.04 Invoice 57284944 -B 1122/2008 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials CLEANER $39.04 Invoice 57284944 -C 1/22/2008 Transaction Date 1/16/2008 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $117.12 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $9,824.26 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1,175.92 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $3,865.43 285 MOUND HRA $31,630.60 450 Parking Deck 1 $4,250.00 601 WATER FUND $6,427.68 602 SEWER FUND $48,538.64 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $69,284.54 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND $10,800.00 $185,797.07 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $185,797.07 Total $185,797.07 -162- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -3190 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 16, 2008 SUBJECT: Variance — Upper floor house addition/remodel APPLICANTS: James and Jennifer Erickson PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 08 -30 LOCATION: 4936 Glen Elyn Road ZONING: R -IA Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY At its January 14, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the application from James and Jennifer Erickson who are requesting variance approval to allow remodel and construction of an upper floor addition on the west side the existing home located at 4936 Glen Elyn Road. The requested variance is outlined below: Existing Proposed Required Variance West (side) 4.4 FT 4.4 FT 6.0 FT 1.6 FT *The existing house setback (at the closest point) is 4.4 FT. The side setback for the proposed addition will maintain the same setback. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The subject property includes a single family home with attached garage which fronts Glen Elyn Road on the south side and includes frontage on Lake Minnetonka on the north side. The applicants intend to undertake a remodel /construction project on the upper floor to provide additional space for their family to include 2 new bedroom(s) and a bathroom. Copies of the Planning Report and application materials have been included as attachment(s.) RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council of the requested variance for the property located at 4936 Glen Elyn Road. A draft resolution has been included for review and consideration by the City Council. -163- A CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 08- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SIDE LOT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4936 GLEN ELYN ROAD PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -11 -0083 WHEREAS, the subject property located at 4936 Glen Elyn Road includes a single family home with attached garage which fronts Glen Elyn Road on the south side and includes frontage on Lake Minnetonka on the north side; and WHEREAS, the applicants, James and Jennifer Erickson, intend to undertake a remodel /construction project on the upper floor (west side) to provide additional space for their family to include 2 new bedroom(s) and a bathroom and have submitted a variance application for a side lot setback reduction to allow the proposed upper floor /remodel improvement(s); and WHEREAS, the requested variance is outlined below: Existing Proposed Required Variance West (side) 4.4 FT 4.4 FT 6.0 FT 1.6 FT WHEREAS, details regarding the variance request are contained in the planning report for PC Case No. 07 -30; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: -164- A. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property since enactment of this ordinance have no control. B. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. C. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant D. That granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. E. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. F. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Ordinance or to property in the same zone. ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its January 14, 2008 meeting and unanimously voted to recommend City Council approval of the requested variance as recommended by Staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the requested side yard setback variance based on the following findings of fact: a. The variance criteria as set forth in City Code Chapter 350.530 have been met. b. Variance(s) were granted previously for the subject property in 1993 for the existing conditions. c. The existing house setback, at the closest point, is 4.4 FT. The side setback for the proposed addition will maintain the same setback. No other deficiencies are being created as a result of the project. 2. The variance is approved subject to the following conditions: a. Payment of all fees incurred as a result of the land use application. -165- I 3. This variance is approved for the following legally described property: Lot 8, Block 23, Shadywood Point 4. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. 6. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350.530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 22, 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -166- and MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2008 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #07 -31 VARIANCE UPPER FLOOR HOUSE ADDITION 4936 GLEN ELYN ROAD JAMES / JENNIFER ERICKSON Applicant requests a variance to allow an upper floor addition on a non - conforming footprint with an existing variance. MOTION by Stevens, seconded by Claywell, to recommgpd Council approve the variance with conditions as recommended by staff. ION carried unanimously. 3 a s. t s 3 e� . "3 .A4 cps r t -167- A 5341 Maywood Road �'- Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 7, 2008 (revised 1115108) SUBJECT: Variance - House remodel / addition OWNER/APPLICANT: James / Jennifer Erickson PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 07 -30 LOCATION: 4936 Glen Elyn Road PID: 13- 117 -24 -11 -0083 ZONING: Residential District R -1A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential !� BACKGROUND James and Jennifer Erickson have submitted an application requesting variance approval to allow remodel and construction of an upper floor addition on the west side the existing home located at 4936 Glen Elyn Road. The requested variance is outlined below: Existing Proposed Required West (side) 4.4 FT 4.4 FT 6.0 FT Variance 1.6 FT *The existing house setback (at the closest point) is 4.4 FT. The side setback for the proposed addition will maintain the same setback. PROJECT OVERVIEW The subject property includes a single family home with attached garage which fronts Glen Elyn Road on the south side and includes frontage on Lake Minnetonka on the north side. The applicants intend to undertake a remodel /construction project on the upper floor to provide additional space for their family to include 2 new bedroom(s) and a bathroom. The project plans, including floor plans and elevation drawings, as well as an updated survey have been included with the application materials. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code` Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application was received and deemed to be complete on or around December 13, 2007. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that this activity was completed on or about January 10, 2008. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: PW Supt. Skinner. No comments /objections on behalf of Public Works. Parks Supt. Fackler. No comments /objections. P/E Tech. Hanson. The submittal of foundation /as -built documents in accordance with City policy is required. Preconstruction site inspection by P/E Department and /or Building Official may be required. The submittal of a New Construction Escrow may be required. No work is authorized or allowed in the public street unless permission is granted and /or permits are issued. Building Official Menth. No comments /objections from Building Official. Applicant will be required for building permit to undertake project which shall include submittal of all required information. City Engineer Faulkner. No engineering issues. -169- I City Attorney John Deana The land use application that you sent me for the subject property appears to deal with remodeling of a structure which was probably legal when established, but which became nonconforming because of changes in the regulations. It appears in this case the remodeling is going to stay within the original setbacks (in terms of a line drawn at the ground); but would add additional second story area. I have visited with other attorneys in the office, and it now appears that they are tending to see this as requiring a variance. The explanation is along the lines that it is a massing, or intensification of the structure that qualifies as an "expansion ". GENERAL COMMENTS 1. At its December 17, 2007 meeting, the Planning Commission deemed the 1991 survey on file acceptable for the purpose of land use revision subject to conditions as recommended by Staff. 2. In general, the project includes "filling up" the arched part of the roofline which adds additional space on the upper floor. 3. The existing house is nonconforming due to setback(s) and hardcover exceeding 40 percent (as allowed for lots of record.) No further encroachment or additional hardcover is created as a result of the proposed project. 4. The side setback(s) for principal structures for lots of record in the R -1A District is six (6) feet. The existing and proposed setback on the west side (at the closest point) is 4.4 FT and is therefore nonconforming. The existing setback(s) on the opposite side are 10.1 FT in the NE corner and 5.3 FT in the SE corner and is therefore nonconforming but not affected by the current proposal. 5. Members may recall that the ordinance was amended a few years ago which allowed conforming additions to be made to nonconforming lots and structures as long as the use was permitted and the addition(s) met the current provisions of the code. 6. According to the hardcover sheet on the subject property, as provided by the applicant, hardcover currently exceeds the (40) percent allowance by 417 SF. Hardcover is not affected by the current proposal. 7. Members are advised that the proposed upper floor addition /modifications maintains the same building lines on the west side. While variance approval is being requested, the addition does not extend closer to the affected lot line. -170- 8. Topography on the subject lot slopes from Glen Elyn Road towards the lake. 9. 'Setbacks on the north (lake), east or south are not affected by the proposal. 10. No comments were received from the DNR regarding the request. 11. Stairs are an allowable encroachment as long as they are located no less than 2 feet from any lot line. 12. Uncovered porches, stoops or similar entrance structures not exceeding 32 SF which do not extend in elevation above the ground floor elevation of the principal building are allowed as long as they are located no less than 2 feet from any lot line. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends variance approval for the property at 4936 Glen Elyn Road as requested so as to undertake a remodel / addition project subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all permits. In recommending approval of the requested variance, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 1. Variance(s) were granted previously for the subject property in 1993 for the existing conditions. 2. The conditions of City Code Chapter 350.530 are being met. 3. The proposed remodel /addition project follows the existing building line(s) of the house and the existing setback deficiencies are not being increased. -171- CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at its January 22, 2008 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at the January 14, 2008 meeting. -172- I a �UWbUND 4'UANNA3 Attn: City of Mound NIoUND PL,ANNINC My husband and 1 requested a permit for a new addition on our home. This permit was recently denied due to variance issues. After further research, we discovered that the pre- existing structure is in violation of current setback guidelines. We are not proposing further encroachment on any side of the structure with a setback violation. Our proposal is simply to build up on the current structure. The added height does not create a variance. We have a 19 month old daughter and are expecting another child in April. Our current home is 1 '/2 stories plus basement. Due to the current layout of our home, our daughter's room is on the first floor and our room is on the second floor. Our proposal is to add two bedrooms and a bathroom onto the second floor, completing the second story. This would allow us to have both of our children on the same level as us. This addition is extremely important to our family as we love our home, our neighborhood and the city of Mound. Unfortunately, the existing layout is not optimal for a family with young children. We are asking the City of Mound to support our addition by granting this permit. Thank your for your consideration. Sincerely, Jim & Jennifer Erickson -173- i L r REr ° �~ DEC .t MOUND PLANNING CERTIFICATE OF 3URVEy_ Prepared for RICHARD SOLLIF C4 Nsk: 929.4 e(cv. it 7' /` Olt shards INAW }I Wafesf{ns shore 0 /`, 81 197-A Id, UN 011 /6A. Lot 6, 6 1 ,r 3 , SHAD 'i',4 i - POI`Tt i.....,;t 6.2 tMNPY `: .oyb eva9G. u n.l , :. r,y to Uu_ Lecurder'l pLat thereof, c COY 2Z.a �. 4�. n9".5 Hennepin r': a.,.; f'i�, ril�ir,r•r.0 C.9. 941.3 } Total Lot Area = 6380 sq. ft. '/ ' (Above 929.4) cY� oo. �LS noJh'� u '' N U i}U� e 9rw,4X C1Yive. ,.Sl.. C' HARD SURFACE COVERAGE:a•t ~ 9 �4?�ir ss? '-�- 50 00 , FYi "'Y T'1'Y1 tJ— .FIA315$ .._....77_x5 ..:.___..__ Exi:s.ta:ng de ck 369 ^•• Y �� k1• Mt steps & patio.s..24.2 eYt.S'S?Na driveway 6V3 - ROAD Xi57?11r_ Hard Cover 2969. Sq. ft. - 47 per cent GENERAL NOTES o Denotes iron monument tr Proposed top of foundation elevation = Denotes cross chiseled in concrete X 939.7 Proposed basement floor elevation = Denotes existing spot elevation 939 Proposed garage floor elevation = Denotes proposed spot elevation le Denotes setface drainage BENCHMARK: Dashed contour lines denotes Proposed features Solid contour lines denotes existing features Recrnti C'e Ma 7 1993 •(9 show additioh ALL - 14i1 R,O LAND r glrsby *tify that this survey, plan or npdr} w prepq¢d by me or under.my direct supervision. SCALE SURVEYORS '�Aq . am o duly Registered Land - Surveyor 1�iVE' YORS 2340 Daniels street under'tgr tows of the State of Minnesota: ---I. BOOK PgGE 11 23 Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Ph: 475 -1433 7 -1 ! 4 —'T $ 1957 025 7 REG. N0. 7_ PILE No. 81 197-A P. PAAD Y VARIANCE IEC 13 -)�n, APPLICATION cnycF 4ftND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. 6-7-- City Council Date ea l se tvoe or onn� a -I9-dM SUBJECT Address PROPERTY Lot U Block LEGAL DESC. Subdivision % oo r) P 3"^ 1 l "- 2-,q — I I - 60,5 3Plat # PID # ZONING DISTRICT R -1 R -1A R -2 R -3 B -1 B -2 B -3 PROPERTY Name f OWNER SQ21�6" Address Phone Home %a' IW,-�i'y Work Fax APPLICANT Name Lu tlu r Address IJ�o�i� P� e�Cact �� Address Fde� pcgic� t N1N �S�y�o HAN THAN (to OWNER) Phone Home °isd.�2�°!a 3D 3 1 Work°��: O," �' 0540 Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 0W 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): ��1 r� Variance Information (12/29/2005) Page 4 of 6 -175- A Case No. ' 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): —RE uiReB -- REouEST �E – (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E W) ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W ) Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. (NSEW) ft. Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: sq ft sq ft ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sgft sgft sgft sgft 4. Does the present se of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: e 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography () soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow () shape other: specify Please describe: _E�-GL`T1 _e' T { - .S "e4 tai e Variance Information (12129/2005) Page 5 of 6 -176- 11SO, Case No. 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land aft{e��r the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain: !"'4© Was- the - hardship created by arq- ether -man- made - change; aue w.�7t- he- relocation -tea road? Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? -r 9. Comments: S) IIE FL Oro EEJJ j c,' "(,-) it MON C.._- I� j J I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature, Applicant's Signature Variance Information (1212912005) Page 6 of 6 a -177- Date 0 Date � �C'7 I tAI HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: OWNER'S NAME. LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% _ (for all lofts) ........ ............................... LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% _ (for Lots of Record) ............................. Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are 6.B.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH HOUSE 4 X �C) ZfT�c��y' � 0 X Z e� - / TOTAL HOUSE .......................... DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) "DRIVEWAY, P RKING EWALKS, ETC. utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350 :1225, Subd SQ FT �Q: 7-)0 ►�� X X = TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS .............::..:........... X X X = TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ......... ............................... DECKS open decks (1/4" min. X Opening between boards) with a I-[�� pervious surface under are not — counted as hardcover. X = TOTALDECK ........................ ............................... X= X = TOTAL OTHER.. TOTAL HARDCOVER ! IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .................... ............................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ..................................... ............................... PREPARED BY bvi Revised 08106/03 -178- 6 ,3(,o'7 Z Z9 9 DATE Z L O � £ \ \ ■ || J | § | � � | � z |� ]§ | $ � f � \} §; \) \ a Iffl �� |§' HIM -179- | \� |, � NON|o / � § , � t- \t !\ 2 f . | |\§ |$ {§ § \� � $ % __� �' ■ � |� \ || r -180- — — — — — 'I — — — — — — — i ,I s n -181- oar � r I .a-4 SS p InAU�F Y ' .$ Ry Zy o I I / �t�tjj L00 / / v I / / rn n Q I ✓ I I I I I !� � j I ' n�Oht 2iKGtlz.�hB pi j j a Q —182— July 27, 1993 RESOLUTION #93 -101 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE AND A SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION AT 4936 GLEN ELYN ROAD LOT 8, BLOCK 23, SHAD ASE NUMBER D POINT, 93I01613- 117 -24 11 0083 WHEREAS, the applicants, Richard and Darlene Sollie, have applied for a variance to impervious surface coverage and side yard setback to allow construction of an addition consisting of a second floor, a garage and an entry, WHEREAS, there is an existing nonconforming garage that substantially encroaches into the front yard setback that as a result of this proposal towill be remo and will represent a substantial improvement WHEREAS, the existing hardcover is at 35.1% and the proposed hardcover is at 38.8 %; the maximum allowed is 30 %, and; WHEREAS, drainage is a major concern for and the adjacent property, and the proposed addition improve the existing drainage problems, and; the setback variances requested include the this property is expected to WHEREAS, following: SIDE WEST 1.6' LAKESIDE O.H.W. 1.0' WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R -lA Single Family Residential Zoning 000 District which a 20 according on yard Code requires a lot ar ea of 6,000 �� setback, 6 foot side yard setbacks for Lots of record," and a 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval with 7 in favor and 1 opposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve a variance to a pervious side rface coverage of 517 square feet, or 8.1 %, setback variance, and a 1' setback variance to the ordinary high water from the existing deck, contingent upon the following conditions: A. The final grading plan be reviewed and approved prior to building permit issuance by the City Engineer and Building Official. 253 IMIC11 I July 27, 1993 B. A drainage plan for the property, specifically at the east side of the dwelling, should be reviewed and approved by staff. C. All retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height shall be properly engineered. D. The nonconforming detached garage be removed prior to building permit issuance, or some type of guarantee be provided, such as cash escrow or a bond. E. All setbacks be conforming on the east side of the property, including the setback to the addition. F. The area under the existing deck shall remain permeable. 2. The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 350:420, Subd. 8 of the Zoning Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420. 3. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land: Construction of an addition. 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lot 8, Block 23, Shadywood Point. 5. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1) . This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 6. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Smith and seconded by Councilmember Jessen. The following voted in the affirmative: Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. 254 am July 27, 1953 The following voted in the negative: none. Councilmember Ahrens was absent and excused. At est: City Clerk -185 255 I 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -3190 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 16, 2008 SUBJECT: Variance — comprehensive house remodel /addition APPLICANTS: Terry and Linda Adams PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 08 -31 LOCATION: 2029 Arbor Lane ZONING: R -lA Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY At its January 14, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the application from Jim and Linda Adams requesting variance(s) approval to allow comprehensive renovation /remodel/reconstruction of the house at 2029 Arbor Lane. The requested variance(s) are outlined below: Existing Proposed Required Variance Side (south) 4.3 FT 4.3 FT 6 FT 1.7 FT Hardcover 46.3% 41.9% 40% 1.9% over BACKGROUND The subject property includes a single family home which includes street frontage on Arbor Lane and lake frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The applicants intend to undertake a comprehensive house remodel project which includes demolition of the "front" portion of the existing house abutting Arbor Lane and construction of a 2 -story addition in this area. The Planning Report, variance application and support materials have been included as attachments. ADDITONAL COMMENT(S): 1. The Planning Commission was in agreement with Staff that the at -grade patio on the lakeside of the home structure is permissible subject to the criteria of City Code Chapter 350.1225, Subd 3.A.1 (a). The applicants also confirmed at the meeting they were in agreement with this assessment. 2. The Planning Commission was also in agreement that the upper floor deck can be replaced without a variance as it is allowed under the recent revisions to state statute regarding remodel /replacement of a nonconforming structures. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the requested setback and hardcover variances for the property located at 2029 Arbor Lane. A draft resolution has been included for review and consideration by the City Council. -187- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 08- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE SIDE SETBACK AND HARDCOVER VARIANCES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2029 ARBOR ROAD PID No. 13- 117 -24-41 -0001 WHEREAS, the subject property located 2029 Arbor Lane includes a single family home which includes street frontage on Arbor Lane and lake frontage on Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Linda Adams, intend to undertake a comprehensive remodel project for the house including demolition of the "front" portion of the existing house and construction of a new 2 -story portion in this area and have submitted an application requesting variance(s) approval to undertake the project; and WHEREAS, the requested variances are outlined below: Existing Proposed Required Variance Side (south) 4.3 FT 4.3 FT 6 FT 1.7 FT Hardcover 46.3% 41.9% 40% 1.9% over WHEREAS, details regarding the variance request are contained in the planning report for PC Case No. 07 -31; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: .. A. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property since enactment of this ordinance have no control. B. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. C. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant D. That granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. E. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. F. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Ordinance or to property in the same zone. ; and — WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its January 14, 2008 meeting and unanimously voted to recommend City Council approval of the requested side setback and hardcover variances as recommended by Staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the requested variances based on the following findings of fact: a. The conditions of City Code Chapter 350.530 are being met. b. The proposed remodel /addition project follows the existing building line(s) of the house and the existing setback deficiencies are not being increased. c. Hardcover is being reduced to 41.9 percent from 46.3 percent which is a substantial improvement and closer to the 40 percent allowance. d. The at -grade patio on the lakeside of the home structure is permissible subject to the criteria of City Code Chapter 350.1225, Subd 3.A.1 (a) :• r e. The upper deck on the lakeside can be altered without a variance as it is permissible under state statute as it is not being expanded. 2. The variance(s) is approved subject to the following conditions: a. Payment of all fees incurred as a result of the land use application. 3. This variance(s) is approved for the following legally described property: Lot 2, Skarp & Lindquists Ravenwood 4. This variance(s) shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. 6. The variance(s) is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved -by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350.530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 22, 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -190- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2008 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #07 -31 VARIANCE HOUSE REMODEL 2029 ARBOR LANE JIM AND LINDA ADAMS Applicant requests a variance to allow a demolition of the lake side portion of the house and construction of a 2 story portion in this area. The south setback is non - conforming at 4.3 feet and would be replaced at 4.3 feet. Hardcover is presently 46.3% and would be reduced to 41.9% with this project. On behalf of the City Attorney, Smith asked if the P deck qualified as a lakeside appurtenance that wou The Planning Commission seemed to think it would MOTION by Stevens, seconded by Burma, to with conditions, including the balcony /pat' E -191- Commission felt the at -grade be a conforming feature. I Council approve the variance , as recommended by Staff. Wit's a replacement. Also, the st- ance. r 5341 Maywood Road �— Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -3190 PLANNING REPORT ;r TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 7, 2008 SUBJECT: Variance(s) — comprehensive house remodel / addition OWNER/APPLICANT: Jim and Linda Adams PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 07 -31 LOCATION: 2029 Arbor Lane PID: 13- 117 -24 -41 -0001 ZONING: Residential District R -1A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND Jim and Linda Adams have submitted an application requesting variance(s) approval to allow comprehensive renovation / remodel project for the house at 2029 Arbor Lane. The requested variance(s) are outlined below: Existing Proposed Required Variance Side (south) 4.3 FT 4.3 FT 6 FT 1.7 FT Hardcover 46.3% 41.9 % 40% 1.9% over PROJECT OVERVIEW The subject property includes a single family home which includes street frontage on Arbor Lane and lake frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The applicants intend to undertake a comprehensive remodel project which includes demolition of the "front" portion of the existing house and construction of a 2 -story portion in this area. The project plans, including floor plans and elevation drawings, as well as a survey showing existing and proposed conditions have been included with the application materials. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the -192- use of his or her land. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application was received and deemed to be complete on or around December 20, 2007. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that this activity was completed on or about January 10, 2008 CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: PW Supt. Skinner. No comments /objections on behalf of Public Works. Parks Supt. Fackler. No comments /objections. P/E Tech. Hanson. The submittal of foundation /as -built documents in accordance with City policy is required. Preconstruction site inspection by P/E Department and /or Building Official may be required. The submittal of a New Construction Escrow may be requried. No work is authorized or allowed in public street unless permission is granted and /or permits are issued. Building Official Menth. No comments /objections from Building Official. Applicant will be required for building permit to undertake project which shall include submittal of all required information. City Engineer Faulkner. No engineering issues. City Attorney John Dean. The land use application that you sent me for the property at 2029 Arbor Lane appears to deal with remodeling of a structure which was probably legal when established, but which become nonconforming because of changes in the regulations. It appears in this case the remodeling is going to stay within the original setbacks (in terms of a line drawn at the ground); but would add additional second story area. I have visited with other attorneys in the office, and it now appears that they are tending to see this as requiring a variance. The explanation is along the lines that it is a massing, or intensification of the structure that qualifies as an "expansion ". -193- Consultant Planner Jeff Miller. • Front yard setback requirement for R -1 A lot should be 20 ft rather than 50 ft, which is indicated on question #3 of the variance application. The existing front yard setback appears to be 21.1 ft rather than 50.7 to 53.9 ft. • Minimum lot area requirement is 6,000 sq. ft. so the lot area is conforming at 6,310 sq. ft. • Based on the submitted survey, it looks like additional non - conformities exist beyond those identified by question #3 on the Variance Application: existing deck in sideyard on south side of house required to have a setback of 4 ft. so it is non- conforming at 0.4 ft. and existing deck on lakeside is required to have a setback of 50 ft from OHWL so it is non - conforming at 41.3 to 43.9 ft. • It appears that the variance for the 6 ft. sideyard setback requirement is needed for the expansion of a second story on the front half of the existing footprint. The existing footprint for the front half of the house appears to have a sideyard setback of 5.8 to 5.9 ft. This is a small variance and substantially smaller than would be needed for any expansion to the rear half of the house, which has an existing setback of 4.4 to 4.3 ft. • The requested sideyard setback variance generally meets the Zoning Code's variance criteria, does not make the existing non - conformity worse and is the minimum variance needed (0.1 to 0.2 ft). • The lot is currently non - conforming with regard to maximum hardcover surfaces permitted - 46.3% versus 40% permitted for lots of record. By removing existing hardcover surfaces and adding pervious surfaces, the applicant is proposing to reduce the lot's hardcover surfaces down to 41.9 %, which is a substantial improvement. • Would the replacement of the existing deck on the lakeside of the house require a setback variance since it would be located less than 50 ft. from the OHWM? GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The project includes remodel of the existing structure within the existing foundation with demolition of the front 2 -story portion which is to be reconstructed to meet the structural and energy code requirements and addition of a 2nd floor above the existing garage. 2. The existing house is nonconforming due to several conditions including but not limited to lot standards, setback(s) and hardcover exceeding 40 percent (as allowed for lots of record.) 3. The side setbacks for principal structures for lots of record in the R -1A District is 6 feet. -194- 4. Members may recall that the nonconforming ordinance allows conforming additions to be made to nonconforming lots and structures as long as the use was permitted and the addition(s) met the current provisions of the code. 5. According to the hardcover sheet on the subject property, as provided by the applicant, the current project slightly exceeds the 40 percent hardcover (41.9 %.) which is an improvement from the current condition of 46.3 percent. Members are advised that the "current" HC calculation sheet and summary includes the calculation of hardcover of (174) feet which was removed this summer in anticipation of the project and has been verified by Staff. 6. Members are advised that the proposed project maintains the same building footprint. While variance(s) approval is being requested, the remodel /construction project does not encroach closer to any affected lot line(s). 7. Setbacks on the north (lake), east or south are not affected by the proposal. 8. No comments were received from the DNR regarding the request. 9. Stairs are an allowable encroachment as long as they are located no less than 2 feet from any lot line. 10. Uncovered porches, stoops or similar entrance structures not exceeding 32 SF, which do not extend in elevation above the ground floor elevation of the principal building, are allowed as long as they are located no less than 2 feet from any lot line. 11. The deck currently located on the south side of the house is being removed which is viewed as favorable due to its close proximity to the shared lot line. 12. The use of pervious pavers allows up to a maximum 85 percent reduction in hardcover and requires the submittal of all required information in accordance with City policy and is subject to review and approval by the City. 13. Applicant is advised that the minimum elevation for new construction on Lake Minnetonka in Mound is 933.0. 14. As the existing upper floor deck and at grade deck are nonconforming and are being replaced with similar structure(s) in the same location (ie. deck to deck) and are therefore not being "expanded," Staff's position is that these improvement(s) are allowable by the recent amendments in state statute and do not trigger variance approval. If the Planning Commission has a different position, a lakeshore variance(s) for these structure(s) should also be processed and /or included as part of the current request. -195- Additionally, Staff believes the "proposed at grade pervious patio," qualifies as a "Water Oriented Structure" as defined below, and therefore would be allowable under the code subject to the provisions described in subparagraph (a): 2. Water - oriented Accessory Structures. Each lot may have one water - oriented accessory structure on private lakeshore not meeting the normal structure setback in Subsection 350.1225, Subd. 3.A.1. of this ordinance if the water - oriented accessory structure complies with the following provisions: a. An at -grade deck is allowed providing that it does not occupy an area greater than 250 square feet and must not exceed thirty (30) inches above grade at any point. b. A lock box is allowed providing that it does not have a total floor area exceeding twenty (20) square feet and does not exceed four (4) feet in height. Where possible, lock boxes shall be positioned such that the narrowest side of the structure is parallel to the ordinary high waterline. c. The setback of water - oriented accessory structures from the ordinary high water level must be at least ten feet. d. Water - oriented accessory structures must be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks or color, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. 15. While Staff recognizes the favorable improvements which are being contemplated including the use of pervious pavers for the proposed outdoor at- grade patio and walkway(s), Staff would like to further discuss with the applicant whether there is opportunity to meet the 40 percent HC allowance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that side setback and hardcover variance(s) be approved for the property at 2029 Arbor Lane so as to undertake a remodel / construction project subject to the following conditions: Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -196- 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all permits. In recommending approval of the requested variance, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 3. The conditions of City Code Chapter 350.530 are being met. 4. The proposed remodel /addition project follows the existing building line(s) of the house and the existing setback deficiencies are not being increased. 5. Hardcover is being reduced to 41.9 percent from 46.3 percent which is a substantial improvement and closer to the 40 percent allowance. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW - Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at its January 22, 2008 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at the January 14, 2008 meeting. -197- 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 N� MINCE PPLICATION Pao DEC 21 ?107 CITY OF MOUND i) 0 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at -time of- application. r� Planning Commission Date Case No. [?�' City Council Date SUBJECT Address 2029 #91bM LAWrr MW NU MW 4553(-014 PROPERTY LEGAL Lot LAT Z Block a DESC. Subdivision i5 Ll�.I Gil -STSyJ PID # - Plat # ZONING DISTRICT R -1 R -1A R -2 R -3 B -1 B -2 B -3 OPERTY Name LJ NOA I -b a w kohms 4 lE�Y AMM e-6 .WNER Address 209 ' Q� -�'�'� �-� MOC�itiflN • �ceT Phone Home L4'-"7a-76o99 Work '-�6 a - 4 q 6 9 Fax APPLICANT I Name 15A (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made-for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure ' for this property? Yes ( ) No (V f. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): #�.l.r�pvt,� �X13'ilu�o �i4w� tuftil �� �ci�a�'kx. �OvwaCTwH - 'i�,hao t>!ol.fT Z.5'ra�'Pbt�t"� 4'Y�1bulu� Variance Information (12/292005) Page 4 of 6 BLOI:9 Case No. �" 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason _ _for valance_ request, -- i.e.- setbackIot -arsa� -etc:) - - -- - -- C C F � Tt o � te_gz� (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E W) �O� ft. *:�•7 Ito •`� ft, ft. Side Yard: rMS E W;) ft. ; Side Yard: (I @E W) _ ft. Rear Yard: (N SOW) �r> � ft. Lakeside: (N S E &� ft. (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover. ft. Ifo ft. sq ft sq ft °�• f Th I/.,5 ft. r rj0.7'R�rJ'?j.°1 ft. ft. .°J ft. �P3t0 sq ft sq ft ft. a. A ft. ft. sq ft 4. Does the present se of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (t� No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? (✓No narrow ( ) topography () soil . ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow () shape () other: specify l Please describe: SOdrH SET IsAck, tit Cc 1Z!k t311_S> V�►�.les �t,., �.3 i3 �. � Variance Information (12/2912005) Page 5 of 6 -199- -- -- - Q� - Case Alo: -- - - - 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain: - -,-7 W-asAhe- hauiship- created lay -afly- otheFHaan- made- ehenge, su eh- as -the- relocatia Yes ( ), No (Jj. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No (✓f. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? AWAcra rr cK:.T To "ice $OUT' -t wHtG+i HAS At.,Sd S4,-N 94 VM4McXAz=i 1�5 a 3 . t b y, StT'bac.+� e 4�'o sow a�r+iertr+.. w+ F U4 W&Us Mrr-a El &I iAV* bIMWAU- eAKkSd IST411b Si %+E�plidti/ `"ro trtt'�►e►�•�a 6mo..I&W %etv.�.bIST_ 1aEUC$�1.1�t� PC1lTie�l �1i2.� L 1d11�E r�.X�{ 2�!fii <3L`l 3I s0 ��� VNIkF.�.t"'�D. INA'DQ1iC1�. 11�k- _u__��fe��E�tM uNScrPLbli� • �c�f"��iit� b w rFLeoP- visr. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. x Owner's Sig Applicant's Signature Variance Information (12129/2005) Page 6 of 6 -200- Dated � �-c 6 % Date LINDA HARRISON ADAMS tort:.- _.--------------- - - - - -- - -- — _ - -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, SKARPS & LINDQUISTS RAVENWOOD SITE ADDRESS: 2029 Arbor bane, Mound Minnesota 55364 EXISTING HARDCOVER Conc. Walks & Drive 664 Sq.Ft. Hardsurface Deck 253 Sq.Ft. e - MIj'��%�% f� A q - - - -- -emu - _ Y° i W EI N L m Total Hardcover 2,923 Sq.Ft. Lake Elevation 817106=929.08 NGVU Lot Area to 929.4 OHW 6,310 Sq.Ft. oy OHO c� `�a r L� \' 0 i of Hardcover = 46.37 0 0 u Oq o Credit for Previously Removed Hardcover= 174 Sq. Ft. / oZ z '3 1., a'3 %i oc e� /9 Note: Deck surface exceed 1/4" spacing Note: Utilities location shown are approximate. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. o Denotes iron monument X 000.8 Denotes existing elev. Revised: December 19 2007 ** Building Dim. Revised: October 8 ,2007 Hardcover, Deck Note Revised: September 21,2007 Hardcover DEMARS- GA.SRIEL .SAND SURVEYORS, INC. 3030 Harbor Lane No. r= lymouth, MN 55447 Phone:(763) 559 -0908 EXIS TING ouoDls / yr� �v 'X C: \EP \DRAW \l3213.DWG hereby certify that this survey, pian or report wos prepared by me or under File No. my direct supervision and that I aUZ&'Z rveyor under the 13213 Laws of the State of Minnesota. Book —Pope -- — - 440 -21 via E. Crook sc ale August 8, 2006 1 " =30' Do Date. 9 -- -201- Minn. Reg. No. 22414 y° i� m 6 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY LINDA HARRISON ADAMS LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, SKARPS & LINDQUISTS RAVENWOOD .SITE ADDRESS: 2029 Arbor Lane, Mound Minnesota 55364 LAKE MINNETO KA Luke Elevation 8 17106= 92.9.08 NCVD o \UV 1 c e, � r° c, ,A 0 Q „ eo 9312��� >>r r �n 4- k g�6 die Note: Existing Deck surface exceed 1/4" spacing. (To Remain) PROPOSED NEW HARDCOVER Eco —Stone Deck 220 Sq.Ft. Eco -Stone Driveway Srup 63 Sq.Ft. Eco —Stone Walk -- 341 Sq.Ft. Eco —Stone Hord surface 624 Sq.Ft, Less 859' Allow as Droinable 531 Sq.Ft. New Hard Surface 93 Sq.Ft. New House /Caroge 1,978 Sq.Ft. New Concrete Drive 571 Sq.Ft, Note: Utilities location shown are approximate. CALL GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. r o Denotes iron monument X 000.0 Denotes existing elev. PROPOSED NEW 2,642 Sq.Ft. Lot Area to 929.4 OHW 6,310 Sq.Ft. 7 of Hardcover = 41,9/ "''r coy _ 933.1 x 1 ` � C rc C: \EP \DRAW \l3213.DWG I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report . was prepared by me or under File No. DEMARS- GABRIEL my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Lon d rveyor under the 13213 AND SURVEYORS, INC_ Laws of the State of Minnesoio. Book —Page 3030 Harbor Lane No. — _ _. 440 -21 Plymouth, MN 55447 David E. Crook Scale Phone:(763) 559 -0908 December 19, 2007 22414 Date: Mirn. Reg. No. 1 " =30' -202- HARDCOVER CALCULAT IONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: 2pjct AVI V M v�0 rAN. r2r7 OWNER'S NAME: (,J Nt:�r4 aF►'ilt.p4'MS LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% _ (for all lots) ........ ............................... LOT AREA (O 3 10 SQ. FT. X 40% (for Lots of Record) ..... ...... ........... ZFj� • Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE + A'tfAXA&y> qt-3T9 2•5& X 24 3 = r- rlp.at `tot f X TOTAL HOUSE ............... o010do DETACHED BUILDINGS X = (GARAGE/SHED) X = TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ..... ....... :::.. DRIVEWAY, PARKING X = AREAS, SIDEWALKS; ETC. X X = TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ......... ............................... DECKS Open decks (1/4• min. Z �• 3 X Iy •_. Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X. .; counted as hardcover. X = TOTALDECK ........................ ............................... X = TOTAL OTHER ..................................... ............. TOTAL HARDCOVER 1 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .................... ............................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ..................................... ............................... Nom COGS If 2jb3 3�1cj �fG•'S`'! PREPARED BY DATE Revised 08/06.w103 w .IEL.Lkvo t twMeJA YO'2.S �la�H • R��nnoo�u.�� I7�Stt�l t -203- I 3742 ST. CHOIX TRHIL SOUTH RFTON, MINNESOTA 55881 LETTER OF. TRRNSM IInTTRL T0, i43•r75°J' 0q l' ( cc P+1. 7 c-3 - %9 -O9 os RE 2oZ9 Amt- LAiue. ; Ltwp -rr-my ApArnS PHONE(651)436-6866 FRX (651) 436 -1287 ORTE COPIES: ORTE: NO: DESCRIPTION: _ Way �,� 3X �1.1t L�•3 • REMRRKS #I DAida NF.cz+E �¢+E. Mgt S1 T Ckhwca!✓s CAc�c c,1.�'ito�'� ; W*IZ.s You Nam. UP VX*-Z b -fto¢ tLC.tc 24.3X 10.4 = 2 .72 A ikw tft -5QV" TtAkSF. • PAVVOVF— C.ouc.. 15 .� 2 - 3cj .o F44 95Z- 472.04i?A To - •Wew Nom-t�t Ew-c�. 8x3 5 = 28•a S,teA ,�t McutJb �sc..l�s�ct: NtTGH �' ` &MOVE ISIXQu c� 3"k 21.1 = (c3.15 Czr`I Tn �kaxL -y At.a...A, i �tR I I ,AY Foes • G51- W5 ca -'.f la •�� t � H�avcout =l�. � 37 y . d2. �•�i.1tt `% �.J � . 1.3t1. ccx�E. - 4� • 4f �o • STo N Prc.1�. 2Zx to = 22o _ Way �,� 3X �1.1t L�•3 • •�k-vj cw w-Y t4wif. 4414x°5 = 220 • �z.Y Ntcct+�'.�py I i K I I= IZ . Icw "4 15 rove = 602A. s `Std �ioG�.S 85 Yv at.JAWV t;i AS pR.AI "%t - � • 530•? 't� 25yq .da 2G1iZ•�i GAT HAi'.A G.tt. 4b urcc�otNC. �wl�uSf_Y f�n�ouE��ta�cou�z - i-A • UAIS6 CALL `204Y au.A�u • GSI- y 3L• coo (.4. IN I. -LO/ r 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -3190 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 16, 2008 SUBJECT: Variance — House remodel /addition (detached garage) APPLICANT: Mike Mueller (agent on behalf of owner Craig Wolf) PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 08 -32 LOCATION: 4774 Kildare Road ZONING: R -lA (south of Longford Road) and R -1 (north of Longford Road) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY At its January 14, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the application submitted by Mike Mueller (agent on behalf of owner Craig ,Wolji requesting lakeshore setback variance approval to allow construction of a new garage addition for the property at 4774 Kildare Road. The setback required by the City Code is 50 FT (as measured from the closest point of the structure to the 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark OHWM.) The requested variance is outlined below: Proposed Required Variance Garage addition — lakeshore setback 42 FT 50 FT 8 FT BACKGROUND The subject property includes a single family home (rambler with attached garage) which fronts on Kildare Road on the south side, Tyrone Lane (unimproved) on the west side, Longford Road (unimproved) on the north side and also abuts a wetland of Lake Minnetonka. The applicants intend to construct a garage addition on the front (south) side the house and also undertake a remodel project. The Planning Report, variance application and support materials have been included as attachments. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the requested variance for the property located at 4774 Kildare Road as recommended by Staff. A draft resolution has been included for review and consideration by the City Council. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 08- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE LAKESHORE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4774 KILDARE ROAD PID No. 19- 117 -23 -22 -0057 WHEREAS, the subject property located at 4774 Kildare Road includes a single family home (rambler with attached garage) which fronts on Kildare Road on the south side, Tyrone Lane (unimproved) on the west side, Longford Road (unimproved) on the north side and also abuts a wetland of Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, the owner, Craig Wolf, intends to construct a garage addition on the front (south) side the house and also undertake a remodel project and has submitted a variance for a reduced lakeshore setback; and WHEREAS, the requested variance is outlined below: Proposed Required Variance Garage addition 42 FT 50 FT 8 FT (lakeshore setback) WHEREAS, details regarding the variance request are contained in the planning report for PC Case No. 07 -32; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: -209- A. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to the property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of property since enactment of this ordinance have no control. B. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. C. That the special conditions or circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant D. That granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. E. The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. F. The variance would not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Ordinance or to property in the same zone. ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its January 14, 2008 meeting and unanimously voted to recommend City Council approval of the requested lakeshore setback variance as recommended by Staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the requested side yard setback variance based on the following findings of fact: a. Variance(s) were granted previously for the subject property in 1995 for the existing condition(s.) b. The conditions of City Code Chapter 350.530 are being met. c. The proposed remodel /addition project follows the existing building line(s) of the house with the exception of the new garage. d. The existing structure and proposed addition are located significantly away from the actual edge of water. -210- e. The 50 -foot lakeshore setback cuts through a significant portion of the subject lot f. Only the NW corner of the proposed garage is within the 50 FT lakeshore area. The majority of the garage structure is in a conforming location. g. Construction of the garage addition in this location allows use of the existing driveway. 2. The variance is approved subject to the following conditions: a. Payment of all fees incurred as a result of the land use application. 3. This variance is approved for the following legally described property on the attached Exhibit A: 4. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. 6. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350.530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted January 22, 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -211- MINUTE EXCERI�TS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2008 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #07 -32 VARIANCE HOUSE REMODEL / ADDITION (GARAGE) 4774 KILDARE ROAD CRAIG WOLFE Applicant requests a lakeshore setback variance to allow construction of a new garage addition. The requested setback is 42 feet from the OHW. Applicant's representative Mike Mueller (5910 Ridgewood Road) attempted to add pertinent information. MOTION by Burma, seconded by Paulsen, to recom d Council approve the variance with conditions as recommended by Staff. MOTIOR, arri� unanimously. -212- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 7, 2008 (revised 1115108) SUBJECT: Variance(s) — garage addition / remodel OWNER/APPLICANT: Mike Mueller — Agent for Owner Craig Wolf PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 07 -32 LOCATION: 4774 Kildare Road P I D : 19- 117 -23 -22 -0057 ZONING: Residential District — R -1A / R -1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND Mike Mueller (agent on behalf of owner Craig Wolf) has submitted an application requesting lakeshore setback variance approval to allow construction of a new garage addition (south side) for the property at 4774 Kildare Road. The lakeshore setback required by the City Code is 50 FT (as measured from the closest point of the structure to the 929.4 Ordinary High Wafer Mark OHWM.) The requested variance is outlined below: Proposed Required Variance Garage addition (new) 42 FT 50 FT 8 FT PROJECT OVERVIEW The subject property includes a single family home (rambler with attached garage) which fronts on Kildare Road on the south side, Tyrone Lane (unimproved) on the west side, Longford Road (unimproved) on the north side and also abuts a wetland of Lake Minnetonka. The applicants intend to construct a garage addition on the front (south) side the house and also undertake a remodel project. The project plans, including floor plans and elevation drawings have been included with the application materials. -213- I REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application was received and deemed to be complete on or around December 26, 2007. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that this activity was completed on or about January 10, 2008. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: PW Supt. Skinner. No comments /objections on behalf of Public Works. Parks Supt. Fackler. No comments /objections. P/E Tech. Hanson. See attached memorandum dated January 4, 2008. The submittal of foundation /as -built documents in accordance with City policy is required. Also, preconstruction site inspection by P/E Department and /or Building Official may be required. The submittal of a New Construction Escrow may be required. No work is authorized or allowed in public street unless permission is granted. No work is proposed in wetland /cattails area. Building Official Menth. No comments /objections from Building Official. Applicant will be required to obtain building permit to undertake project which shall include submittal of all required information. -214- City Engineer Faulkner. The drawings submitted for this request are difficult to determine exactly where the new garage is being added on to the existing home. While the drawings could be more informative, the request for a variance of 8 feet (42' from OHWM vs. required 50) is understood. The applicant states that "open water" is about 200 feet away due to a huge area of cattails. While this appears to be the approximate case, we feel this is somewhat irrelevant as the minimum requirement is 50 feet back from the OHWM which provides the buffer area for storm water treatment and general aesthetics, etc. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. At its December 17, 2007 meeting, the Planning Commission deemed the survey from Coffin & Gronberg submitted by the applicant acceptable for the purpose of land use revision subject to conditions as recommended by Staff which included a comment that it be revised, as needed, by a qualified individual and that the PC reserve its right to require additional survey information if needed. Members are advised that the survey was updated by Gene Allen of Gene Allen Design who is an architectural technician. 2. The subject parcel is located on a channel of the lake and the area below the OHWM abutting the parcel is wetland. Members may recall that past practice has been that the City has considered the fact that a substantial separation exists between the lot line and the open water area when reviewing similar requests. 3. The existing house is nonconforming due to a lakeside setback. A variance was previously approved in 1995 (Resolution No. 95 -111) to recognize an existing nonconforming 25 FT lakeside setback for the house to allow construction of a conforming addition. Copy attached. 4. The house existed prior to the adoption of the shoreland regulations which created the 50 -foot lakeshore setback requirement. 5. In general, any addition on the west /north side(s) of the subject lot requires variance approval due to the 50 -FT lakeshore requirement which cuts through a large portion of the subject lot at an angle. 6. The existing garage is being remodeled as living space (great room) as part of the renovation project. The existing footprint of the house is not changing with the exception of the new garage. Members are advised that roofline alteration is not deemed to be an expansion of the nonconforming structure based on review and discussion with the City Attorney. 7. According to the hardcover sheet on the subject property, as provided by the applicant, hardcover is within the (40) percent allowance. -215- I 8. Setbacks for the addition on the south / west / east sides are being met. 9. No comments were received from the DNR regarding the request. With previous requests, DNR Staff has commented that minimally construction should not occur within the shoreland impact zone (1/2 of the required setback to OHWM.) 10. Stairs are an allowable encroachment as long as they are located no less than 2 feet from any lot line. 11. The code requires the "appropriate side or rear" setback be assigned for lots abutting an alley less than 15 feet. Members are advised that Tyrone Lane is platted at 15 feet therefore a six (6) foot setback would be required in this location. The code allows a minimum setback of (10) feet for unimproved streets which exceed 15 feet therefore a minimum setback of (10) feet is required from Longford Road. Both of these setbacks are being met. 12. Uncovered porches, stoops or similar entrance structures not exceeding 32 SF which do not extend in elevation above the ground floor elevation of the principal building are allowed as long as they are located no less than 2 feet from any lot line. There are also other allowable encroachment allowances including, but not limited to, mechanical equipment, bay windows, etc. 13. Applicant is advised that the minimum elevation for new construction on Lake Minnetonka in Mound is 933.0. 14. Construction of the new attached garage has been proposed in the location due to the renovation /conversion of the existing garage to living space and the location of existing driveway. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the lakeshore setback variance be approved for the property at 4774 Kildare Road for the garage addition project subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all permits. -216- In recommending approval of the requested variance, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 1. Variance(s) were granted previously for the subject property in 1995 for the existing condition. 3. The conditions of City Code Chapter 350.530 are being met. 4. The proposed remodel /addition project follows the existing building line(s) of the house with the exception of the new garage. 5. The proposed structure is located significantly away from the actual edge of water. 6. The 50 -foot lakeshore setback cuts through a significant portion of the subject lot. 7. Only the NW corner of the proposed garage is within the 50 FT lakeshore area. The majority of the structure is in a conforming location. 8. Construction of the garage addition in this location allows use of the driveway. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at its January 22, 2008 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at the January 14, 2008 meeting. -217- r VARIANCE APPLICATION 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAx952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at tirne of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. d City Council Date Dineen hma nr nrinf lanihly SUBJECT Addresr>__g 7 7 Y PROPERTY Loth 1?-, -;Z 3 &K to f- Eo r5 6 ,$ l' Oc K 'f Block LEGAL DESC. Subdivision S L r owl PID # 11 1/2' Z3 �Z2- 605-7 Plat # ZONING DISTRICT R -1 R -1A R -2 R -3 B -1 B -2 B -3 PROPERTY Name x-12 41 OWNER Address 7 7 y lC IL d /12 t %Z Phone Home "" AC Work Fax APPLICANT Y_L I -S (IF OTHER Address /P k f� �d�,rera 1� 0 L3 THAN OWNER) Phone Home 'YN -5-36X work ,239'%�d i Fax q?,;Z - 'V34L 1. Has an application ever D n made for zoning, variance, conoluonai use perm, or oiner zornng praceoure for this property? Yes No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of solutions. 2. .Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Information (3/2912006) Page 4 of 4 -218- Case No. 3. -Do the existing--structures-comply-with- all-area, height,--bulk, and setback regulations-- for -the- zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No X. it no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): P� S 2- nVo7--i= FRSM '0 PEA." Au,+"F.2 15 ?ovf Fzo- SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED (or existing) Front Yard: (NOE W) 9-y ft. ;Z1 . I/ _ ft• Side Yard: ( N SON) ft. .4 • � ft. Side Yard: (N S E& / O ft. / / . % ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. Lakeside: & E W) 0 tL % ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. Street Frontage: y 0 ft. ;Z- O ft. Lot Size: O0 sq ft 17 sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft. ft. ft. 3 ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (jh, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography () soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage N existing situation ( )too: shallow ( ) shape () other: specify Please describe: % �� ('� !f GJI- jS ,4�'�!2(X F2a•�r Pk'D�aS c AJ A9 t0 €IVLA.4 O P�Ai V A-7- gk 15 k4-'bx� .2.06 " t U F -7--n L1 a A-k F- A 0 )c cf,4 7-7-.4 )4_3 /ti c, y,¢1ViV1_1_ -I 1,+ ?,64C7` /.5 M r Al t /K 4,L , Variance Information (3/29/2006) Page 5 of 5 -219- Case No. 01_3 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes O; No If yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No Yom. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes 0, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? ,--- 9. Comments: A Ib D PT o/0 AIMF l'S L. G- it C f�a f �/i'I �fJ `5 11J /T t¢ T,_E C [-0 5 .62... 7-6 PlwPf 6e.T Y 7-Wif N OPg /L) -„Ay --M9,, AL50 OK4 t/ /aas j�1 1f NCB � C Nt 46k L .517 -6,-GK o F 2.�5-` Fo4 J>ak.. I �., l t Y u� � T IN G �'► � �'f�f1 ���tl t�,,,' ?� .d�r��.+ �.. F%� �' r� r�� �. t T OA,r I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. X, .. ~, Owner's Signature Date �v� •� Applicant's Signature. Variance information (3/29/2006) Page 6 of 6 -220- Date Mound Planning Commission Mound City Council RE: Variance request 4774 Kildare Road Mound, MN 55364 I am writing a brief summary of why I am requesting a lakeside setback variance for my property at the above address. I wanted to increase the size of my house and not affect the large rear yard, so the best way was to convert my current garage to livable space and then add a garage to take care of my vehicles and additional storage for snowmobiles, lawn tractor, gardening equipment, etc. I spoke with the City staff regarding the setback requirements and looked at the best location for the garage. Since I still wanted an attached garage, the most reasonable location was to the street side of my home in front of the current garage because the layout of the house is such that putting a garage on the eastern side would not have the appropriate floor plan flow, we would be coming into the bedroom end of the house and not the public areas, which is more typical. I took a look at where it might be best located on the west side of the lot and with the help of a draftsperson, came up with what is shown on the drawings. The functionality of both the house and the garage was considered. We took a look at the front fagade and felt the garage would not look like an added on, afterthought the way it is proposed. By offsetting the garage, the new family /greatroom of my home will have windows to the front, side and rear of the home and the garage will meet all setbacks with the exception of the OHWL. This setback is still 17 feet further from the swamp edge than my deck is and is even less of an impact this direction as far as my neighbors are concerned. The size of the garage will meet my needs and is so far back from open water, that the impact is very minimal. I hope you look upon this request favorably, as it has such a minor impact on the lake due to the huge swamp area and meets all other setbacks. Thank you for your time and effort in this matter. Craig Wolfe -221- I 5 HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: OWNER'S NAME: Wo ICe- LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% (for all lots) ....................................... LOT AREA 17,;2 K 0 SO. FT. X 40% (for Lots of Record) * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd, 6,13.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SO FT HOUSE x (00 lqkg • A TOTALHOUSE .................................................... DETACHED BUILDINGS 160 X (GARAGE/SHED) Di TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... DRIVEWAY, PARKING 1X I& x 0 AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC.. . :Gj x DECKS Open decks (1 X'min. Opining between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover. q p-o t75-a" 1(70 X TOTAL' DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ go 3 x X x TOTALDECK ........................ ............................... X - x TOTALOTHER .................................................... -Z,5--6 10 1- r 3 64 11 ;co TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... 75- UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .............................................. 3 PREPARED BY —M Ma L L- E.. DATE Revised 05/05/05 —222— F052 L H IDICOVER CALC LATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: 7 7!Y it 6 AR-.& 9A74 OWNER'S NAME: r-- k �- ) L, k20 Lf= e, LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = for all lots) ........................................ LOT AREA 75 19 SQ. FT. X 40% (for Lots of Record) ............................. j * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 350:1225, Subd. 63.1 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SO FT HOUSE x X TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... (0 DETACHED BUILDINGS Ct+ 14(a," - x t (0 -& 5- (0 x (GARAGE/SHED) 3-4/ 001"'N, TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... u/ -3j'z- F-xt-5T-//VG DRIVEWAY, PARKING x = 0 of WEW AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. x f -g'�,�,�b,arv� K la 9 + x smhl(► TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ....................................... DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. x C to 5-, Z Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not x counted as hardcover. X TOTALDECK ....................................................... 7-1 AXo x �zoe,K x 0 'D - TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... 1) 7 & V 1 5 6 x0 )1 70 UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................................................. 2�D -a I' I � I`. ( PREPARED BY DATE /07 Revised 05/05/05 -223- le- r r r p r f `Ile E Hennepin County Oblique Aerials V Page 1 of 1 Q� y D��pQ� V) http: / /gis.co. hennepin. mn. us /HCPropertyMapBirdseye.aspx ?PID= 1911723 22005 7 -225- 12/6/2007 15" �k 40 40 1 ,1ONGFORD R, 0 'Z A* o 12000 N UY- 2S f r- MDARE DESIGNED BY REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY 226 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 6, 7, 8, R!c Block 10, SETON. denotes iron (f21.4): denotes exist Bearings shown ar This survey inter described proper, and the location It does not purp( encroachments. I VF ;I M Y will {{ t7 [� C -� -227- r _ r E \ x. •{4yi�y . . . �G O ' � '�",.,v}j" '�+ f S •;6�% ,.yy,.� s � y� r a .,; i +x - ` i . yS�lt'r Fg'�` ,; t' !} .t � " b L �! i^ i ". ��� , ... .. i C r c i Ifi +i �.°.`# �• .Z �- Icy T II , I h 11 KP t44 v 1 1 rk lyv e� t it Sri to JT 1 ., f I 1 FF 7 41 , r 2 r . R Lw -229- i r Ilul TIMM- 1 o gg ' I r n o o ° �� o� G c� IT f A O w .. � "�" wn v `pN � � M V,^, ,. �� �� �y �o-di p �� ,.. ... � w vt aik ry� . �.�„ � � _ � g�:4 r <L �*a' ;,: � :. � Sys �'i, � �r ����"`�'�" [pp�{ k � / � F �' 1M RM t. ': Ayr `7k " a, ." +{!� .., .. � .; ';.; � � � ,aa� � � �q„ '�. x„ ,�,,,, �.�.�' w�'a �W` *�a y 's.e. ;R : � � � ,1 � , rJ� a �! V V `� y, iw �«n;'µil E�i� "`' m QI � t+ v O A V Of m au w V O 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 ►Ti1=1►L',Eel 7_1`I oil I ►'.I To: Sarah Smith, CDD From: Ray Hanson, Engineering /Planning Technician Date: January 4, 2008 Re: 4774 Kildare Rd Variance request 1. Would request survey be updated to reflect the existing and proposed conditions, as well as existing and proposed elevations prior to building plan submittal. 2. Please show existing services on updated survey. 3. if existing water shut off is located in d /w, an access cover will need to into new d/w at homeowners cost. 4. All site plan dimensions and setbacks need to be verified by surveyor prior to building plan submittal. 5. Maximum driveway opening at street is 24 feet. -233- r MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 24, 1995 CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS: The following three resolutions were made by Councilmember Jessen, seconded by Councilmember Hanus, and carried unanimously: 1.5. Case 95 -45: Craig Wolfe, 4774 Kildare Road, Lots 6-8 & 18-23, Blocks 4 & 10, Seton, PID 19- 117 -23 22 0057, Variance for Addition. RESOLUTION #95 -111 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING LAKESIDE SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING ADDITION r AT 4774 KILDARE ROAD, LOTS 6, 7 & 8, BLOCK 4 AND LOTS 18-23, BLOCK 10, SETON, PID #19- 117 -23 22 0057, P &Z 95-45. 1.6 Case 95-46: Raymond Loehlein & Tarja Kala, 5982 Bartlett Blvd., Lot 11, Seifarth's Mound Bay Park, PID 23- 117 -24 42 0093. Variance for Garage. RESOLUTION #95 -112 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING FRONTYARD SETBACK TO THE DWELLING TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING DETACHED GARAGE AT 5982 BARTLETT BLVD., LOTS 11, SEIFARTH'S MOUND BAY PARK, PID 23- 117-24 42 0093, P &Z #95 -46. 1.7 Case 95-48: Terrance & Rita Hughes, 6641 Halstead Avenue, Lot 17, Halstead Park, PID 22- 117 -24 43 0025 Variance for Fence Height. RESOLUTION #95 -113 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE AT 6641 HALSTEAD AVENUE, LOT 17, HALSTEAD PARK, PID #22 -117 24 43 0025, P &Z #95-48 F4 -234- CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1. As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which the attached and foregoing extract was transcribed. 2. 1 have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. 1 find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on the date indicated in said extract, including any resolutions adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: RESOLUTION #95 -111 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING LAKESIDE SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING ADDITION AT 4774 KILDARE ROAD, LOTS 6, 7 & 8, BLOCK 4, AND LOTS 18 THRU 23, BLOCK 10, SETON, PID 19- 117 -23 22 0057, P &Z CASE #95 -45 4. Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on: OCTOBER 24, 1995 WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the sale of said City, this 25TH day of OCTOBER , 19_95 seal -235- &'t CITY CLERK I RESOLUTION 195 -111 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE RECOGNIZING AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING LAKESIDE SETBACK TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A CONFORMING ADDITION AT 4774 KILDARE ROAD, LOTS 61 71 & 8, BLOCK 4, AND LOTS 18 THRU 23, BLOCK 10, SETON, PID 19- 117 -23 22 0057 P &Z CASE #95 -45 WHEREAS, the owner, Craig Wolfe, has applied for a variance to recognize an existing nonconforming 25 foot setback from the deck to the ordinary high water to allow construction of a conforming two story addition, and; WHEREAS, the subject parcel abuts a wetland which provides a substantial separation between the structure and the open water, and; WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R -1 Single Family Residential Zoning District which according to City Code requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard setback, 10 foot side yard setbacks, and a 15 foot rear yard setback, and; WHEREAS, all other setbacks, lot area, and lot coverage are conforming, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and unanimously recommended approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby grant a variance recognizing the existing 25 foot setback to ordinary high water to allow construction of a conforming addition. Practical Difficulty exists since the property borders a substantial wetland open space and since the proposed improvement conforms to the Zoning Code. 2. The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 350:420, Subdivision 8 of the Zoning Ordinance with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 350:420. 3. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land: Construction of a 16' x 16' two story addition. -236- Resolution #95 -111 October 24, 1995 Pap 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lots 6, 7, 8, Block 4, and Lots 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, Block 10, Seton. 5. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 6. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Jessen and seconded by Councilmember Hanus. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: -- Ahrens, Hanus, Jensen, Jessen and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: None Mayor est: -city 'manager Adopted: October 24, 1995 -237- 243 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Pagel of 2 Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2007 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2006 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $594,000 $513,200 $513,200 $5,420.94 $80.62 $5,501.56 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2007 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2006 Values: Land Market $373,000 Hennepin County, MN www. . .us Machinery Market Property Information Search Result Total Market: $594,000 The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated $322,300 Building Limited daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m. (CST) Search By: $513,200 Note: Taxes Payable 2008 (2007 Values) will be available Classifications: on this web site approximately 03101 lidiiidi RESIDENTIAL LAKE Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2007 SHORE Click Here for the 2007 State Copy to be used when filing for the 2006 M -1PR State Refund HOMESTEAD - ar,Print Agricultural Property ID: 19- 117 -23 -22 -0057 Address: 4774 KILDARE RD r. ® Municipality: MOUND School Dist: 277 Construction year: 1972 HOUSE or BUILDING Watershed: 3 Approx. Parcel Size: IRREGULAR #: Sewer Dist: 4774 Owner Name: C W WOLFE & N A WOLFE STREET NAME: Taxpayer Name CRAIG W & NANCY A WOLFE (at least first 3 & Address: 4774 KILDARE RD characters) MOUND MN 55364 Kildare Road . _1..1.1.1 ................... UNIT # (If applicable) .................. . Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and are not warranted to represent 5earcfilewar.'` arms - length transactions. Sale Date: April, 1992 20 ? records per page Sale Price: $126,000 Transaction Type: Warranty Deed Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: SETON Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: LOTS 6 7 AND 8 ELK 4 ALSO LOTS 18 TO 23 INCL BLK 10 Abstract or Torrens: TORRENS Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2007 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2006 Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: $594,000 $513,200 $513,200 $5,420.94 $80.62 $5,501.56 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2007 Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2006 Values: Land Market $373,000 Building Market $221,000 Machinery Market Total Market: $594,000 Land Limited $322,300 Building Limited $190,900 Total Limited: $513,200 Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type RESIDENTIAL LAKE SHORE Homestead Status HOMESTEAD Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status http://wwwl6.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresu-238- 1/10/2008 Hennepin County ubtique Aerials gage 1 of i http: / /gis.co. hennepin. mn. us/ HCPropertyMapBirdseye.aspx ?PID= 1911723220057 1/10/2008 -239- I CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 08- Resolution Ratifying and Confirming Execution of the Funding Agreement for Stormwater Best Management Practices for Phase IV of Mound Redevelopment Project (Transit District) with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Stormwater Maintenance Declaration WHEREAS, in 2004, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approved a $1.5M levy to undertake stormwater improvements associated with the downtown Mound redevelopment project following preparation of the report entitlted "Supplementing Mound Downtown Redevelopment with Innovative Stormwater Management'; and WHEREAS, according to the report, the purpose for the MCWD's participation in Mound's redevelopment activities is to incorporate stormwater management practices that reach as far as possible and incorporate as many new ideas as needed to improve the quality of runoff reaching Lake Minnetonka via Lost Lake and Lake Langdon and allows for funding reimbursement for projects which incorporate unique and innovative stormwater techniques; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) have incorporated innovative stormwater improvements in phase IV (Transit District) of the Mound Redevelopment Project which are outlined in the funding agreement which has been included as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the program established by the MCWD in 2004, the funding agreement for phase IV and the stormwater maintenance declaration (Exhibit B) were signed by the Mayor and City Manager on January 9, 2008 on behalf of the City of Mound. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Mound hereby ratifies and confirms execution of the funding agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for phase IV of the Mound redevelopment project and stormwater maintenance declaration. -240- The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember The following -voted in the affirmative:----,.-- The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -241- Mayor Hanus, Mayor and FUNDING AGREEMENT MOUND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PHASE IV STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TRANSIT DISTRICT Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Mound This Agreement is entered into by and between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota with powers set forth at Minnesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D ( "MCWD "), and the City of Mound, a statutory city and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ( "City ") (together, the "parties "). The purpose of the Agreement is to provide for MCWD reimbursement to the City for costs incurred by the City to implement an innovative stormwater management approach in the transit district on City property in connection with the city's downtown redevelopment project. The amount of funding contributed by the MCWD corresponds to the additional water quality and demonstration benefits that the innovative approach will provide as compared with the level of stormwater management required simply for the project to meet federal, state and local laws and permits. The downtown redevelopment project is being constructed in phases. This Agreement applies to one element of Phase IV of the project. Stormwater Facility Design and Construction The City will design stormwater facilities and, after MCWD approval of the design, construct the facilities in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and any changes to the plans and specifications approved in writing by the parties (the "Facilities "). The City will maintain a copy of the plans and specifications for five years from the date construction of the Facilities ceases, or the date 'construction is certified as complete by the City or its project manager, whichever is later. The City will give the MCWD reasonable notice of pre - construction and construction meetings concerning the Facilities. The MCWD and its authorized representatives may attend these meetings, inspect the Facilities at all reasonable times, and review all related documentation. 2. Fundin The City will invoice the MCWD for reimbursement up to amounts and at milestones identified in Exhibit A, attached to and incorporated into this Agreement. An invoice will be accompanied by the documentation prescribed in Exhibit A and such other documentation as the MCWD reasonably may request. The MCWD will make payment for work conforming to the plans and specifications within 30 days of receipt of a complying invoice. -242- The MCWD has determined that partial performance of obligations under paragraph 1 of this Agreement may confer no or limited benefit on the MCWD. As a result, if construction of the Facilities, including the establishment of vegetation where specified, is not substantially completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications by September 1, 2009, the MCWD may obtain from the City a reimbursement of any and all funds disbursed pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding, the MCWD may not have this remedy for any period after September 1, 2009 during which the failure to complete is not reasonably avoidable by the City or those under its control, provided the work is completed by September 1, 2010. The parties will consult in good faith before the MCWD makes a demand for reimbursement. The City shall maintain all project records concerning the Facilities for five years from the date construction of the Facilities ceases, or the date construction is certified as complete by the City or its project manager, whichever is later. The MCWD may examine, audit, and copy any such records. 3. Operation and Maintenance of Facilities Exhibit B, a declaration of covenants providing for operation and maintenance of the Facilities and related signage, is attached and incorporated herein. Exhibit B reflects that the Facilities will be on land owned in fee by the City. The City will execute and record Exhibit B, or an instrument materially conforming thereto, with the Hennepin County recorder's or registrar's office to establish City operation and maintenance responsibilities that run with the land. -243- 4. Independent Relationship. The MCWD's role under this Agreement is solely to provide funds to support the installation, and the dissemination of knowledge about, innovative approaches to stormwater management. The MCWD has no authority to select, or role in selecting, the design, means, method or manner of performing any work or the person or firm who will perform the work. No employee, representative, contractor or consultant of any party to this Agreement acts in any respect as the agent or representative of any other party. This Agreement is not a joint powers agreement under Minnesota Statutes §471.59. Any right to review or approve a design, work in progress or constructed facility under this Agreement by the MCWD or its agent, representative or consultant is solely for the MCWD's own purpose of accounting for funds expended. Remedies; Immunities. No action or inaction of the MCWD under this Agreement creates a duty of care on the part of the MCWD for the benefit of the City or any third party. Only contractual remedies are available to the City for the MCWD's failure to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other term of this Agreement, the MCWD and the City waive no immunities in tort. This Agreement creates no rights in and waives no immunities, defenses or liability limitations with respect to any third party. 6. Effective Date; Termination, of Oblijzations The Agreement is effective when fully executed by all parties and expires five years thereafter. All obligations that have come into being before expiration, specifically including but not limited to obligations under paragraph 3, shall survive expiration. 7. Acknowledgment Any publicly distributed or displayed printed or electronic documents, other text display or public presentation concerning the Facilities shall properly acknowledge the funding and support of the MCWD. Compliance with Laws The City will comply with the laws and requirements of all federal, state, local and other governmental units in constructing the Facilities, and will procure all licenses, permits and other rights necessary to construct the Facilities. In constructing the Facilities, the City will ensure that no person is excluded from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service or activity on the ground of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable federal or state laws, rules or regulations against discrimination otherwise will be subjected to discrimination. -244- 9. Notices Any written communication required under this Agreement shall be 'addressed to the other party as follows, except that either party may change its address for notice by so notifying the other party -in writing: To MCWD: Administrator Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 18202 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, MN 55391 To City: City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 10. Waiver A party's failure to insist on the strict performance of any obligation under this Agreement, or to exercise any option, remedy or right herein, will not waive or relinquish that party's right in the future to insist on strict performance of that or any other obligation. A party's waiver of a breach of an obligation of this Agreement will not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of that or any other obligation. A waiver must be in writing and signed by the party. 11. Venue and Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any legal action hereunder shall be Hennepin County, Minnesota. -245- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto execute and deliver this Agreement. Date: / -q -or STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF MOUND By. ItsVayor Its Ci Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this(,? ti day of , 2008, by as �c `¢ �':c r of the Date: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing inst was (1)0 ��� 2007, by the APPROVED AS TO FORM & EXECUTION -246- to jL` JODI RAHN Public NOT BLIC - MNNESOTA * 4On Expires Jan. 31, 2010 MDWEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By: (" President of Bo of agers k `h' before me this day of as MARCIA ZWALLINGFORD NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires Jan. 31.2012 Exhibit A Phase 4 - Transit Station Stormwater Facilities BMP Financial Party Cost Payment Schedule ** Stormwater Pond City of Mound $ 35,950.00 N/A Sand Filter MCWD* $ 60,000.00 10/1/2007 Raingardens MCWD* $ . 27,194.00 10/1/2007 Porous Paver System MCWD* $ 216,660.00 11/1/2007 Total $ 339,804.00 City of Mound $ 35,950.00 MCWD $ 303,854.00 *Contractor invoices submitted for payments issued for actual costs incurred, not -to- exceed specified amount * *Invoicing submitted on identified date or substantial completion, whichever later, processed per the terms of the Funding Agreement -247- Exhibit B DECLARATION THIS DECLARATION ( "Declaration') is made this day of , 2007, by City of Mound, ( "Declarant "). RECITALS WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of real property within the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, platted and legally described as: [Insert Legal Description] (the "Property ") and no one other than Declarant, has any right, title or interest in the Property; and WHEREAS, Declarant, in exchange for financial participation in the construction of the Transit Station Stormwater facilities on the site desires to subject the Property to certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as a condition of a project for the mutual benefit of the owners of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant makes this Declaration and hereby declares that this Declaration shall constitute covenants to run with the Property in perpetuity, and further declares that the Property shall be owned, used, occupied, and conveyed subject to the covenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens set forth in this Declaration, all of which shall be binding on all persons owning or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property, and their heirs, successors, personal representatives, and assigns. 1. Stormwater Facility Maintenance. The terms of Attachment B, incorporated herein, shall apply to the stormwater management facilities indicated on the site plan for the Property attached hereto and incorporated herein as on Attachment A, identified as follows: NEU Rain Gardens Sand Filter Porous Paver System Stormwater .Pond 2. The recitals set forth above are expressly incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument the day and year first set forth. DECLARANT: By: 4 City of Mound, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF �6y-sk Q0, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this JC;r C--'V -t , 2007 by 9 day of Notary ubhc This Instrument Was Drafted By: JODI RAHN NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA W Co nrhw n Expires Jan. 31, 2010 2 -249- I BMP Operations and Maintenance Manual MOUND TRANSIT FACILITY Prepared for: City of Mound City Project No. PW -0605 June 2007 Prepared by SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF No. 5731 -250- RAIN GARDEN OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -251- a W yr w V C v as y —252— 0 N Z C d 3 0 y CL U X 0 m h ro a 0 w a O O O O O@ — m CO Co 0 d iV c C 0 O O O 0. m � p o Lo ` Lo Lo ` � ` N ti ti'if v ca v i ( CO 05 v U CU 0 L ti ,6 CV d ca > > > 0 >E ' >rtt�E > .. .., U Q to 1 Q 0 N L U Q C 0 U fG U Q «� (o U} Q r% N N N >+ U 0 ` 0 v c0i 0 E 0 v L) °� L co C C CO 0 C C C Q C 7 C (o . C f6 C E2 L Co cco 'C E fo C �. _ CO � CO fo "O d tG L fo c' ) M w0) -a C O rte+ C +p+ m C C y C O C d E3 Eco E aa) >o g E g Ems 00 0 w 00 CD 0 o 0E� a o� , m o� 0 0 • C N 0C�oOO 0 z�i Z ZC �- Z Zw3w x w c • c 0 w a 0 i m a>i '0' Co C Co 0 o 0 0 E H c [A E • ' O � N N 0 3 0 rn rn = 0 0 Cn > a) c6 Lino c c C O L C O) co 0 C O O .F O w- p to t :2 m E C N C _ -O 0 p Co to lII 03 c ca Co C C C '�. O7 n' O o m kt.,:• .:. O O :a. a sI • O co C ..r p N C O O N 0 _ d 0 �_ o E m (4 L 0 0 N C 0 O O E, C 7 0 k .0— C CD U c OQ = 0 i) O. C +� co o v N +N• O) .9 to C O C O w C 0� Co 0 CL 0 M L 0 o f 3 > co W a ui a Cao > D d r N M d —252— 0 N Z C d 3 0 y CL U X 0 m h ro a 0 w a V V C k. —253— O N m 3 E co v d d d h O O C C O L C w C U M y d N Ui« O `" .O N s9 lT1 C c t0 •^ 't rn C E cm c C- p JI. co E co hic i6L a E ca E «+ O C E� N ._ aQ ° ti� cCL 0d E: E r a N 0 G_ ° t a �' ° ° c 0 3 3 3 °r 3 3b°) 03c cm 0 (D CO � E cu C a3i CL i, ✓ O — U L C :3 N U 'O t y (D 'p c O O r_ c c O U d O p y c0 m o c N C Cc wY c0 'co Z c O E2 C Ca p ` L a. N c cu U g `_ a ca 'a a0 a ai ° 'D E °o° >, > a) °y ° a C 7 N o 1f i O L 3 y (0 M 0 C N O M L :- O OO .0 L.O 'dam C yk C O O U 'rn N C � Q ¢ � (DEc°�c°� Q3 � Q c� e E is c 0 0 ++ 0 a E .'' E E CD O V 0 O O) N w WE .0 E w E N C E O C C ° cm 'i- ca (A f6 j c N N C m O r L O O E py� c ii lC ' N C F- Q m o W 'N^ VJ h .- N cM �t t0 c,6 ►� 06 —253— O N m 3 E co v d d d h O O C C O L O V V � t6 O C c L O m wV, W N c `o o r 00 _ r R 0 i O L d�+ CL d rL m O = I -254- C E O V d v c ca 2 M C N E a t �O O .N 2 E 0 V 0 o 0 0 0 C C 0 J J 0 J � 0 E F > O V 6 C C .0 Z � L O V d 0 w C 0 C d _ co H W V! Q U -254- C E O V d v c ca 2 M O � � V d d d d C = d to L � `�► L O C m O = 0 N O L Q- m C 0 C D � 3 Q. to m O 5 c O E L 0 O 0 -255- 0 a a� ca c c� a a� 3 ai rn c� E c� c 0 c�a m N L E .0 E C O O (D 0) N C N d r cu C � ea c CL 0 .0 c O I *0 O C O_ d Q cm 0 M > c v SAND FILTER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -256- LL CL C y 4 v is V —257— 0 0 N (0 3 Q y V CL d w C Lwv cc a (9 O LL M t. O O 3 y M —0.2 V (s6 O d O 4- O 4 - O y O X 4- O C O L O .r. O m= '5 D O LO o 0 a z ts -�F; G O U (0 N C O.� L L w a _ (Q O C r G N C O 8 M C O 8 •> • > > (o > C R y a a) CO a `6 d CD L '.. N. C N �` C 0 (0 C (6 Q) ..x .. •' C@ C d 0 C E= m C y �+ C C 0 � L O. m r- E ' •- 'i:f rte. > C C � C N_ yM L C N C Ey (a M > E 42 O O L E O 2 ay E— to v1 E> t #' L >�'OC a� ro mo >m o .� a f1 m 4`o c O m oo m O E V y ,� O c O C O o N Z v .�i Z C N O Z L O .. Z ._ U Z L .- c L O _ N N C y 3 Mo > . m 0) O - c O LO d =. 0 w ? b O o d (0 O CD Ct) co 21 m 2f' 0 > > f6 fq > * W W rn Q W � L cD C m U E U Lla o a; a� a) c 'w'.. i L _ L m O U p C L O N S. _ rr tC Q1 7 i E ' C it (D t6 ? :r (0 O n E 3 C U O (o rn n O .. .. harr U C V N cA o O > fn U) 'w; r N M eh tp ...;ter —257— 0 0 N (0 3 Q y V CL d w C Lwv cc a (9 O LL M �r b C L: `J V V C C C • L N cco '.0 c0 .�. 0 c0 •� y N Qi L E >. O Co o N O) o CO 0 CL L U (A 0) (D >.'oa E N O' 2 m O E 0a)m m G .y � O 0 ca ,CE N c 2.E c0 O 3 Eco 2 — O o 'oo � a N Q dj NN @ O OU aD o a U) r-• N c d cw N U CL > E O .� }r c E N y m E �UU U m o U E > .. O O c v cm 0 0 c 3 o y c CL Q 00 L N ❑ c C C O cQ .6 (D CL a O fl.. E CL .a (D O E o N N M c M U C C N N Q N N c N > C a j W C71 Q W ._ E o c fR > O C O C d s. O U c (p N fl -0 > N 0 _7 O (0 y E o c o (D m c-` aa) = co a °- E E > 1- fn O v (n r N c`7 d Ln a 0 N ro Sfi i U Z d S O 111 G a 0 a a m -258- 0 N 'C L O v V V+ L cc L �W v •� m C 'd C � O p -0 n C N O v CL O _ J O C O_ Q. N m O = Z m _ m _ E d t0 N � � L = V Ca =_ n 75 G V m CD U v, CL ca .Q .`n o ZR C O CL N O N 3 r O O d � 0 0 0 } O L) 0 U ro U U U .m J J 2 J d N U) z = O v z Tv cn C O N w 0 E } C Q z N 'C } 7 C V U t �N H .5 Q F- W U) O Z -259- U) C d E 0 V d C R C C t- m _ m _ d t0 � � L = V G =_ n G V m CD CL .Q .O N 3 m C c O d � } O L) 0 U O U .m m 2 d N U) 0 = O v V Tv cn C O N w 0 E � C Q U -259- U) C d E 0 V d C R C C t- STORMWATER POND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -260- a 3 d �r V C L a C C -261- h O N ctl d d d N O yr ro C a ca L. KA •U •''" �'.' .p 1..: U to U co U co U U co U ca co ca m co <m, m ca ca 4 'Cr C C C C C C C E E E E E E E v� tnv c) co u� (nn U) co y N N N U1 V! N ..'• V U U V U '.. U U co 0 co C ca .0 roco C co c c c c c C c E E E E E E E m co m m m C c c c ..; U U U 0 U 0 U o U U E O (n y O O E E ' N co co m co m c0 (0 C tk -r N U LD 1, 0 :. O O .9 y 4 1i:.: 5 cz 'p N O y t,F sir N O _ - m cm L_ O ` O O C O C fVi, O C5 C. y N ?) O p > �- is" O C O O C U U N N Co cn 0 E ° c 3 c o - co m cn U CD w O O U r . Pik r CV l+') -261- h O N ctl d d d N O yr ro C a ca L. KA C CL V.1 3 I0A v+ v� V Q V y� -262- O N C 0 w y V a1 w U) 0 a �n y t�0 20 ;Z Z., C c r.. ca v O C13 0 c i+ O O O U t_ O U O ay E ca C W O a a) d V m V y y -2 o '.c a c CL Cr c m a) c a) n s O a) L U tQ E 0 u, a) U a) ,r o aai y � fQ .a x 3 a N Y a a°i a t0 3 0� p 3 y v y O o o t v ai o m 4) ,. = m U = w z' 3 0 c � C y �. ca '- a) ( c C O C D c C z. O 0 0 O O O cx n o CL a. n CL y y y y y o (1) o p `(D m 4) a) CL n C. d a O N m a) N w L C a) p O '0 ii `Yvt; N E E d S N a) is} t/C� flC� O •�- CC: o m cc tm C ;• n a c :, 0 rn (D v co a) > 0 m, c C �. C L a) N y Co a y � •D C d y O w 7 a3 CD O teNa/) �NN/ teNa)) teNa/) �NyN � N M d' ui co -262- O N C 0 w y V a1 w U) 0 a �n y t�0 20 IL W L d d•+ 3 E .W cn V r- as 0 n. O C co V ea d v c :3 S c V a� � d E = L O c +�+ co a� U) N � c Y (J L 20 E O L) O a) 2 Cl 0 o � V � � O C 2 .O � J C � a) d i c c ca v E as CL a) (A C a m 0 0 0 L V 3 a m O 5 -263- Z �I r- as 0 n. C co a� ea O v c :3 S c a� � d E = L O c +�+ co a� U) N � c Y (J 0 20 E O L) O a) 2 Cl Z r � a) o O C 2 .O c o � a) d c c ca E a) CL a). E a) co .(.D + cc U N n3 � O (D L O fl. 2 Su a.., N 'a O O cu 0 0 0 J -i J c Z c O �. O s W Z' d d } m N .L c 0 > m d % CL N w 0 w °to i= � w -263- Z �I c d E O L) c ea c c O r- as 0 C co ea O c :3 S � d = L O c +�+ co N � c Y (J 20 c d E O L) c ea c c O r- 0 co O O c co N � c Y (J E O L) O a) 2 Z r � a) o O C 2 .O o � c m d c c c d E O L) c ea c c O /101, POROUS PAVERS (BIO- AQUIFER STORM SYSTEM) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE -264- 4 Q CL a t a -265- e •q fl&d.. °. U (D V C C C c0 c0 c0 a) a a's C C .r C E E Z E � CD cu may" N N N C C co C ca cu N ( N N co ca CC 'C3 c t. w co cc m c6 N L to L S L 0 L 14i ��.•y,.i,i C pC C C O C O O C C C C C 00 0 co E o w CL . cmr.. Ch -265- — 1 a y O Q CL w v V C w C Yr Q) W C aS 2 c E N w O U U (lS > U a ` °= < 3 'O a N o _ - � a) a C a) a) 3 0 to a a y o " M O a c m C c- w ccoo co -0 3 �i aai 00 J C s `�4 •+S O O `: •3 a) a) L a) a`) a a O CD .0 > c ' o tr_ N > ' a rn Q m E cu Z5 C L E E N > CD > • -O c 7 y a3 a _ a) n. ccoo co ai 3 a n, -266- N L -, L V d V aN,. Rf M IL 0 � C 0 .a O = EL c 0 d Q. N C L. 0 m CL N _ w ea D C O � 0. C Q. m O c Z -267- c m E O v m V C R c M Z m t� C O C .mr C Z_ g m Z � O d a d J m E O c Q. Z .0 cc O 'a x c U) O U- o a c m C `� E 'R '0 EaD � o 0 0 000 ca m U U U J J J -267- c m E O v m V C R c M Z Z_ m a rn C Z � O d a d J m E O c Q. Z .0 cc O 'a x c U) O U- o a c -267- c m E O v m V C R c M I r Wadq 9 i gg VIOS3NNIW ONnON .YIgBg � is8 9 '9 ww �� kIJ110`dd JNDlWd bIRN30 IISNVU aNnovy 0 I I O i IIIIIIOIIIII' Yifl R Z F el j y` I I I t el i m F w U K X41 r HN Lata ' F I I 4. `b4 ♦� m W I 1 I II I m I ` I a yj 'y 1 I m I k338 > E �• R ��rc n >am.. I r — w A QA19 33�12WJNOD - R Z F el j y` I Waldron & Associates, Ltd. 201 First Street West Waconia, Minnesota 55387 (952) 442 -7520 • Fax (952) 442 -7521 MEMORANDUM Date: January 2, 2008 To: City Staff From: Bob Sullivan, Plumbing Inspector 6,"-7 Re: Plumbing Permits It has come to my attention that MN Statute 1613.665, 2007 HF 1208 has been _ repealed. I have attached the Statute. Effective December 1, 2007, the plumbing permit fee for the improvement or replacement of a residential appliance, such as water softeners, water heaters, iron filters, and drinking water systems will be the minimum plumbing fee. In other words, the fee for plumbing change -outs or installations of water heaters and water softeners is no longer $15. Fee schedules will need to be updated to reflect current laws. If you have any questions regarding this, please contact me. Building Confidence -269 -h Code Compliance 16B.665, Minnesota Statutes 2006 Page 1 of 1 Legislature Home I Links to the World I Help I Advanced Search �0w 0 �6r ±f, House I Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions I Bill Search and Status I Statutes, Laws, and Rules Minnesota Statutes Table of Chapters Chapter 16B Table of Contents 16B.665, Minnesota Statutes 2006 Copyright © 2006 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. 16B.665 PERMIT FEE LIMITATION ON MINOR RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS. A municipality as defined in section 1613.60, subdivision 3, or a town may not charge a permit fee that exceeds $15 or 5 percent of the cost of the improvement, installation, or replacement, whichever is greater, for the improvement, installation, or replacement of a residential fixture or appliance that: (1) does not require modification to electric or gas service; (2) has a total cost of $500 or less, excluding the cost of the fixture or appliance; and (3) is improved, installed, or replaced by the home owner or a licensed contractor. History: 2001 c 207 s 5 Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, visit the Contact Us page. General questions or comments. 16B.665, Minnesota Statutes 2007 Page 1 of 1 Legislature Home I Links to the World I Help I Advanced Search cm 'Qf r House I Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions I Bill Search and Status I Statutes, Laws, and Rules Minnesota Statutes Table of Chapters Chapter 16B Table of Contents 16B.665, Minnesota Statutes 2007 Copyright © 2007 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. 16B.665 [Repealed, 2007 c 140 art 13 s 3] Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, visit the Contact Us page. General questions or core_ 270- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2008 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 380 TO THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ESTABLISHING LAND USE FEES FOR THE CITY OF MOUND The City of Mound does ordain: Section 380 ESTABLISHMENT OF LAND USE FEES, is hereby amended in the City Code to read as follows: 380.15 Plumbing Permits: 310.00 Permit Fee $25 Per fixture fee fnr major $10 Per rough -in only $10 16B665 Permit Fee for mep;aGeMeRt 4300 $15 $�vv -$dGry 5°v Gf 'iMp O em� Ge&t (Mine t6) Per 100 feet of pipe or fraction thereof $8 Per 100 feet of repair or fraction $5 Outside sewer and /or water inspection $25 Private water well inspection $25 310.40 Additional inspections $10 Passed by the City Council this 22nd day of January 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Published in the Laker on the Effective on -271- Mayor Mark Hanus I 40 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS January 4, 2008 Mr. Carlton Moore City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Mound Transit Center Parking Facility Payment Application No. 10 City of Mound Contract No. PW -0605 Walker Commission No. 21- 3338.00/360 Dear Mr. Moore: Walker Parking Consultants 1660 S. Highway 100, Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Voice: 952.595.91 16 Fax: 952.595.9518 www.walkerparking.com We have reviewed the Pay Application and Certificate for Payment No. 10 for the amount of $78,249.32. It appears the contractor has completed the work identified and we recommend payment as requested by the Contractor. Three signed copies of the original pay request are enclosed herein. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS -'Wa, Darwin L. Muzzy, Project Manager DLM /pc Enclosure J:\21-3338-00-Mound—Transit Center PF \Correspondence \PayApp 10 Moore 122107.doc -272- O N tT ro CL N O n F- Z W 2 D U O G w O U ~ O Z = U Z O Q OU O S❑E N N N M O � Z O Q p Z O O U Q d -1 U IL J CL a Q LL Q d c z 'IT U m M C LO c at Z o c m � U O cn O O d' IL v ro d O Cl) v LO o g 2 ro WO C Z o O U 0 O Cl) LO O 19 O Z Z W W w cr a a U w U w Q co O O N N r Iii Q U 9 z 0 U' C N O O 7 N ro C 0 3 LO U a c0 2 x U L y W o- o a ro U m Q U C CF o cn U .O. 2 O U � N O T LO U U o O C O c Q a O C_ Q7 c Z N -� c O rn w C7 N w O Of LL m � c a: rn m a 7 C a) L N a F- Z W a a O LL Z O 1- Q v J (L a fY O F- F- Z O V ac; ) C U G ,7 c a) 7 Q Q N a> c 0 c c U c ro c ' o v :r c c O •� U L ° V C L ° aGi E O_ O � U C6 F- Z O co U d ro m 0 Z? co 522 C� O •3 J ti7 U, a C9 r -E a-88 O T Z � I, I r` 0 O � N N U a °' S � E O tp T ro U) c C � M o a O to U) U cn E 'I a U 'y � y a E E O m U z O W W� (XD CO N 0� M O O � c O m LO � O N a) to O co o' F- 'a ro o m -o O ro C cc (U N 00 O W O � W oym a r c 6e.,�0 U O N C Q } a) N ro a o (L o 2 rn rn CL ro O ii. O = t E_ co U. N U N 6R 69 OC > co ro Efl Q U C OLD' �• U o o O m � a) m 00 �- a> co O co p LIJ o E aw N a) LL i Q W U C U Z w H O J (D a Y W o m a) c U o m {- a t W U Q o OU Z N ca = -O O N U U 2 f0 w E O� c OUC o o ea ea Q U r- c L E° 64 r� rn •N o W co w I W ro O a w c ro co W c -C Y a 0 m O 4 F- U C13 0) c o F- y U O Z aa) a Q -. w b!= C w Z) ° ro EEp v ro O ro Nw a C U Q tS N Q O U Q O W W� (XD CO N 0� M O O M O M OV O m LO 0 N F- LO Op N 00 O W O � O N N d' r c CEO I o o O ~ N rn CL ro O � U 00 Efl 6R 69 EFJ O 61l M Efl H3 W 0, CO 00 Z E aw Q U p N U cri Cl) (> o m {- a rn N W Z N ea ea 64 w W ° Ul ro Nw a :a N J W O o Z F- a) V (` � S til 0 ° m Lo W 3 M+ a C s F, d 0 Ct} p• C -O h O O in E F- S U rn o W o Lu $ C c N W O V W to c o wl r U+ cn O v° J I°- LO N a Z co F- U W O O LL E 0 a) z aI �. LL m O 'n �: n o o c o c m O 2 > v a 0 V O (7 C7 O o o °° o o U y W I- M Z ►- Z W V Z t Z"'U °'U c ZQM O U Q yo www a F- ° U)i O z L) U ,co cd F° 0 Z&_3 a v m r- N M 4 L6 DOWC11 co ti oo 6 `o U C` N C ro O U � o►i a, ^ Iw c O � T° o m w / N CL ro � ty ro Q O� O U W (1) tp U � Z L o p n Q -0 a� m Co TE o U ro @ 0 0 0 c U o c ° C N y N y c O •� m m o m N Z O p U O W O N Z O F- Op 4 r c J o o O ~ N rn CL ro O � U W W 0, CO o Z E aw Q U p Q U (> o m {- a o F- W Z N tT N 0 I Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department Survey Division - Suite A -703 612.348.3131 Phone Hennepin County Government Center 612.348.2837 Fax Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 www.co.hennepin.mn.us January 14, 2008 Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk City of Mound 5342 Maywood Rd. Agreement # A14569 Mound, MN 55364 -1687 Hennepin County desires to extend the above referenced EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement through December 31, 2008. If you as a Government Unit, Consultant/Third Party or Private Corporation, desire to extend the above - reference Agreement, the following requirements must be satisfied as they pertain to your entity. Please return the required information to Hennepin County, Attention: Robert Moulder (at the address stated at the top of this page). A.) GOVERNMENTAL UNIT MUST FURNISH TO THE COUNTY A COPY OF THE ACTION OF USER'S GOVERNING BODY AUTHORIZING THIS AGREEMENT EXTENSION. HOWEVER, IF AN OFFICIAL OF USER IS �- AUTHORIZED BY STATUTE OR CHARTER TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT OF THIS NATURE THEN THIS ORIGINAL LETTER SIGNED BY SUCH OFFICIAL AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION MUST BE RETURNED TO THE COUNTY. NOTE: SUCH OFFICIAL MUST ATTACH TO THIS LETTER A COPY OF THEIR STATUTORY OR CHARTER AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENTS. B.) CONSULTANT /THIRD PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE COUNTY A COPY OF AFFIRMATION BY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT THAT YOU WILL CONTINUE AS CONSULTANT AS STATED IN AGREEMENT NO. THROUGH THE YEAR 2008. IN ADDITION, CONSULTANT /THIRD PARTY MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. C.) PRIVATE CORPORATION MUST SIGN THE ATTACHED SIGNATURE PAGE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RETURN ORIGINALS OF BOTH TO THE COUNTY. -274- As authorized by the Agreement and noting the above requirements, which pertain to you specifically, please indicate below your intention to extend or not to extend this agreement through the year 2008. Please return the originals of this page and the aclmowledgement page and a copy of affirmation as ConsultanVThird Party, as required, to the attention of Robert Moulder at the address shown at the top of page 1 as soon as possible. Please check (X) appropriate box. It IS our intention to extend this agreement through the year 2008. _ It is NOT our intention to extend this agreement through the year 2008. We no longer require this information. Signature: Date: Authorized Signature Title: If you have any questions about this notice, please call Robert Moulder at 612 - 348 -2618 for assistance. Sincerely, A t- P Richard P. Johnson County Administrator -275- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 08- RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE LICENSE AGREEMENT ( #A14569) WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY REGARDING ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY GEOGRAPHICAL DIGITIZED - -- - --0ATA- BASE - (- EP9B)- AN- D- AUTHaRI G --THE - -- -- - CITY MANAGER TO SIGN THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Hennepin County has developed a proprietary geographical digitized data base (EPDB); and WHEREAS, the City of Mound desires to use the County's EPDB in the course of conducting the City's business; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved the license agreement on April 13, 1999, by Resolution #99 -31; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved the extension of this agreement through December 31, 2002, by resolution #02 -17 and extension through December 31, 2003 by resolution #02 -112; through December 31, 2004 by Resolution 04 -09; through December 31, 2005 by Resolution 05 -08, through December 31, 2006 by Resolution 06 -07, through December 31, 2007 by Resolution 07 -07; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is now asking that we extend the EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement through December 31, 2008; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute the extension of Hennepin County's EPDB Conditional Use License Agreement ( #14569) through December 31, 2008. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January, 2008. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -276- Mayor Mark Hanus AL MEMO DATE: November 1, 2007 TO: Geoff Michael: Planning Commission Christine Ebert: Planning Commission Mike Paulson: Planning Commission Teri Turner: Parks, Open Space and Docks Commission Jim Funk: Parks, Open Space and Docks Commission Steve Johnson: LMCD Board FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mana RE: Term Expirations and Confirmation of Interest 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com You are at the end of your term as a commission/board member. In preparation for the Mound City Council Annual Meeting on January 8, 2008, Staff would like to confirm your interest in being reappointed to your volunteer position serving the City. Please indicate below regarding your interest and return this memo Jim Fackler or Sarah Smith by 12:00 noon, Friday, November 9, 2007. You may fax it to 952- 472 -0620, or mail it to or drop it at City Hall at 5341 Maywood Road. Feel free to use the drop box after hours. Thank you for your willingness to serve over the years! My name: ( f 0 4.704 Commission/board on which I serve: Z.� a Please consider me for reappointment for another term: t es No trcle One, Please) ® printed on recycled paper -277- Executive Summary Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©® TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Jeff Miller, Consulting City Planner DATE: January 16, 2008 SUBJECT: PC Case #07 -28, Application for a Major Subdivision, Preliminary Plat, Planned Development Area - Conditional Use Permit (PDA -CUP) and Water Resource Permit for the proposed Woodlyn Ridge 11 -unit residential development at 6301 Lynwood Boulevard The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their January 14`h meeting where a motion to recommend to Council approval of the Major Subdivision, Preliminary Plat, Planned Development Area - Conditional Use Permit (PDA -CUP) and Water Resource Permit for the proposed Woodlyn Ridge 11 -unit residential development at 6301 Lynwoo-d-Boulevard was recommended with conditions. Both Staff and Planning Commission are recommending approval of the four (4) requests. Members of the Council are advised that four (4) resolutions based on the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the four (4) requests have been prepared. An overview of the proposed Woodlyn Ridge residential development is contained in the Planning Report and support materials which have been included as attachments. The applicant is requesting approval of a PDA -CUP to enable site design flexibility and variety for an unusual site due to its irregular shape, the resulting lot geometries, the site's topography, the location of the traveled versus platted centerline of the adjacent CSAH 15 roadway, and the fact that this project is an infill residential development bounded on three (3) sides by existing residential development and on the fourth side by a County Road. During construction of CSAH 15, the platted centerline was not adhered to resulting in a traveled centerline that is located south of the platted centerline and therefore crowds the northern property line of the proposed development site. The applicant is proposing reduced front yard and side yard setbacks as a means to enable larger buffer and backyard areas between new residential lots and existing adjacent residential lots. In addition, the applicant is proposing a variety of hardcover percentages by lot that range from 22% on the largest lot to 35% on the smallest lots. The cumulative hardcover for all lots is 30 %. This approach to hardcover control will allow the developer and builders the flexibility to design and build homes with unique architecture yet maintain the overall development architecture standards, such as varying garage types and varying driveway configurations /sizes, to achieve variability and individuality of homes as viewed from the street. In response to the City's concerns about the height of the proposed retaining wall and recommendation that the applicant consider a two - tiered wall rather than a single wall, the 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -278- applicant described their subsequent exploration of a two - tiered retaining wall. The applicant presented a draft sketch of a two - tiered wall approach that enabled the wall to be located primarily on one lot (Lot 7) instead of two lots; however, one of the walls was placed within the wetland buffer area. Since City and MCWD ordinances do not allow structures to be located within a wetland buffer area, this approach would require approval of a variance as well as formal review and approval by MCWD. The applicant has been exploring alternative approaches that would not result in the placement of the retaining wall(s) within the wetland buffer area. During the public hearing, one neighbor expressed his concerns about the tallness of the proposed retaining wall and that too many lots were being proposed for the site. Since a small portion of an existing wetland adjacent to the east side of the property is located on the subject property and the vacated Butternut Road right -of -way remnant, the need for a Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and/or wetland permit(s) has been a topic of ongoing discussion between Staff and the applicant. Councilmembers are advised that the "Wetland Conservation Act Decision Notice " accepting the boundary determination was approved by Mark Perry of Bolton & Menk on October 3, 2007. The delineated wetlands have been included on the submitted preliminary plat completed by Otto Associates, dated 11/28/07. Members are advised that the Public Hearing Notice for the Preliminary Plat and PDA -CUP for Woodlyn Ridge included a notation that a WCA and/or wetland permit may be reviewed as part of the subdivision and land use applications. However, based on the most recent design(s) from Project Engineer Cara Otto on January 17th which was reviewed by the City-Engineer, it appears the applicant is not proposing any development within the existing wetland nor the wetland buffer area. Therefore, Staff has concluded that a WCA or wetland permit is not necessary at this time. If the applicant determines that the retaining wall(s) will require any sort of alteration to the wetland or the wetland buffer area as they move forward with the project, additional permitting may be necessary. Minimally, a "Notice of No Wetland Impact or Loss " will be required for the proj ect. As summarized in the Planning Commission meeting minutes, one neighbor expressed his concerns about the proposed storm water pond that would be located directly behind his property, particularly potential negative impacts to existing large trees in his backyard and safety concerns regarding kids' access to the pond. In response to the neighbor's concerns, the applicant's engineer described the proposed design, function and construction of the pond. It is anticipated that the development team will provide additional comment(s) regarding the aforementioned issues as the public hearing. Members are advised that the developer is also requesting an early construction start for the 2 homes abutting CSAH 15 so construction would be complete in advance of the Fall Parade of Homes Tour. Members may recall that similar agreements were prepared for other developments in Mound. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -279- RESOLUTION #08- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MAJOR SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PROPOSED WOODLYN RIDGE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 6301 WHEREAS, the applicant submitted a Preliminary Plat Application for the proposed Woodlyn Ridge residential development on November 29, 2007; and WHEREAS, the applicant previously submitted a sketch plan for this proposed residential development, as permitted by the City's Subdivision Ordinance, which was informally reviewed by Staff, the Planning Commission at its October 8, 2007 meeting, and the City Council at its October 23, 2007 meeting; and WHEREAS, the subject site is located on the south side of Lynwood Boulevard in the area between Westedge Boulevard and Robin Lane, near the western edge of Mound; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to subdivide the 4.17 -acre property into 11 residential lots for single - family detached homes; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to create one new public street, Woodlyn Ridge Court, as part of the subdivision, which would have a 50 -foot right -of -way and access Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15) on the north side of the subject property; and WHEREAS, the City's Comprehensive Plan guides this land for Low Density Residential, which allows single - family detached and attached housing types within the density of one (1) to six (6) units per acre, and the proposed subdivision would be 2.6 units per acre, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use and density guidance; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1 (Single - Family Residential) zoning district, which has a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet or maximum density of 4.4 units per acre, and the proposed subdivision would be 2.6 units per acre, which does not exceed the maximum density permitted in the R -1 zoning district; and 1 :1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the proposed Woodlyn Ridge Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat, land use and related applications at its January 14th meeting and recommends that the City Council approve the Major Subdivision /Preliminary Plat Application for Woodlyn Ridge subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council, on January 22, 2008, held a public hearing for review and consideration of the Woodlyn Ridge major subdivision — preliminary plat in accordance with City Code Chapter 330 (Platting and Subdivision Regulations.) NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Application for the proposed Woodlyn Ridge 11 -unit residential development is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. Preliminary Plat of Woodlyn Ridge shall be consistent with Preliminary Plat exhibit dated 11/28/07 that was prepared by Otto Associates with the exception of modifications required by other conditions of this resolution. b. Submission of a certified copy of the resolution that vacated the-half of that portion of Butternut Road adjacent to this property in 2001 and subsequent transfer of the vacated parcel to this plat prior to filing a Final Plat application for Woodlyn Ridge. c. Preliminary Plat shall be modified to incorporate the swale area within the backyards of Lots 7, 8 and 9 into the drainage & utility easements for these three lots. d. Preliminary Plat shall be modified to add a trail easement within the proposed drainage & utility easements along CSAH 15 to accommodate a future county trail. e. Preliminary Plat shall be modified to show a 15 foot drainage and utility easement on the east side of Lot 6. f. Drainage and utility easements, as required by the City Engineer, shall be provided and submitted in a form so as to allow for recording at Hennepin County and shall be subject to review and approval by the City. g. Preliminary Plat shall be modified to reflect revisions to the wetland buffer that result from the applicant's anticipated changes to the proposed retaining wall. 2 -281- h. The applicant shall be responsible for preparation, execution and recording of a Wetland Buffer Declaration the form and content of which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City of Mound. Utility Plan shall be modified to provide a gravity sanitary sewer system rather than a forcemain system to meet City Engineer's recommendations outlined in Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review memo dated December 13, 2007, including adequate drainage & utility easement adjustments to accommodate the shifting of the sanitary sewer line. Payment of all required utility fees at the current approved rates prior to release of the resolution: Water Trunk Area Charge (WTAC) - $2,000 /unit, Sewer Trunk Area Charge (STAC) - $2,000 /unit. Payment of water service connection fee - $240 /unit, and sewer service connection $240 /unit fee as part of building permit. Payment of SAC fees as part of the building permit. k. Payment of any City fees associated with review of the Preliminary Plat Application or related land use permitting. I. Park dedication requirement shall be fulfilled by cash payment in lieu of land — in accordance with City Code. m. Any and /or all conditions included in the official resolution approving the PDA -CUP for the project. n. Approval of the Water Resource Permit for the project including satisfaction of any and /or all conditions. o. The lots shall have non -lot of record status. p. Applicant shall be responsible for providing all existing /proposed legal description information in electronic form to City of Mound. q. Structures shall not be built into the required front, side and rear yards. r. The homes shall have at least 840 square feet of area, not including any garage. s. Structures, roadways, driveways and parking areas must be located outside of the wetland buffer. t. A hazardous material inventory and demolition permit will be needed prior to the demolition of the existing house per MPCA requirements and City policy (if applicable.) -282- u. The installation of new water and sewer service must be completed prior to release of the Resolution or some type of financial guarantee provided, such as a cash deposit, letter of credit or performance bond, to cover the cost of utility service connections prior to the release of the Resolution for recording. v. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction including but not limited to installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be replaced. w. An approved Hennepin County permit will be required for any construction taking place within CSAH 15 right -of -way. x. Locations of water and sewer services need to be approved by Mound Public Works Department. y. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met and all fees have been paid. z. No building permits will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution(s) and easement(s) has been provided to the City by the applicant. aa. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the major subdivision - preliminary plat is approved. bb. The applicant submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit applications, when appropriate. cc. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. dd. No work is authorized or approved on public property. Applicant is advised that additional permitting may be needed in the event construction or other related activities are undertaken on public -owned land and is contingent upon the specific improvements proposed to be constructed. ee. The applicant shall be responsible for submittal of the Final Plat in accordance with the established timeframes in the City Code. 4 -283- r ,— ff. An agreement between the City and Developer to allow for early construction start(s) for up to two (2) homes is prepared and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 2. The Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Application is hereby approved for the subject property as depicted on the attached Exhibit A. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus 5 -284- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #08- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) FOR A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) FOR THE PROPOSED WOODLYN RIDGE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the applicant, the B. Benson Group, is requesting approval of a Planned Development Area (PDA) Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in accordance with City Code Chapter 350.460 for the proposed Woodlyn Ridge residential development at 6301 Lynwood Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the PDA -CUP process is to provide a method by which parcels of land in the Residential Use Districts having unusual building characteristics due to subsoil conditions, topographic conditions, elevation of water table, unique environmental considerations, or because of the parcel's unusual shape or location in relationship to lakes, trees or other natural resources requires more unique and controlled platting techniques to protect and promote the quality of life in the City; and WHEREAS, the applicant previously submitted a sketch plan for this proposed residential development, as allowed by the City's Subdivision Ordinance, which was informally reviewed by Staff, the Planning Commission at its October 8, 2007 meeting, and the City Council at its October 23, 2007 meeting; and WHEREAS, the subject site is located on the south side of Lynwood Boulevard in the area between Westedge Boulevard and Robin Lane, near the western edge of Mound; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to subdivide the 4.17 -acre property into 11 residential lots for single - family detached homes; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to create one new public street, Woodlyn Ridge Court, as part of the subdivision, which would have a 50 -foot right -of -way and access Lynwood Boulevard (CSAH 15) on the north side of the subject property; and WHEREAS, the City's Comprehensive Plan guides this land for Low Density Residential, which allows single - family detached and attached housing types within the density of one (1) to six (6) units per acre, and the proposed subdivision would be 2.6 units per acre, which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use and density guidance; and -285- WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1 (Single - Family Residential) zoning district, which has a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet or maximum density of 4.4 units per acre, and the proposed subdivision would be 2.6 units per acre, which does not exceed the maximum density permitted in the R -1 zoning district; and WHEREAS, the R -1 (Single - Family Residential) zoning district has the following minimum requirements: • Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq ft • Minimum Lot Width 60 ft • Minimum Lot Depth 80 ft • Minimum Front Yard Setback 30 ft • Minimum Side Yard Setback loft • Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 ft Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 60 ft, except that lots fronting on a cul -de -sac shall be 60 ft at the front building setback line; and WHEREAS, all of the proposed lots meet the minimum lot area, lot width, lot depth, lot frontage and rear yard setback requirements; and WHEREAS, the applicant has indicated that the purpose of the PDA -CUP request is to enable site design flexibility and variety for an unusual site due to its irregular shape, the resulting lot geometries, the site's topography, the location of the traveled versus platted centerline of the adjacent CSAH 15 roadway, and the fact that this project is an infill residential development bounded on three (3) sides by existing residential development and on the fourth side by a County Road. Additionally, during construction of CSAH 15, the platted centerline was not adhered to resulting in a traveled centerline that is located south of the platted centerline and therefore crowds the northern property line of the proposed development site; and WHEREAS, as part of the PDA -CUP, the applicant is proposing smaller front yard setbacks of 25 ft versus the R -1 minimum requirement of 30 ft and alternating side yard setbacks of six (6) ft on one side and ten (10) ft on the other side versus the R -1 minimum requirement of 10 ft; and WHEREAS, as part of the PDA -CUP, the applicant is also proposing smaller corner side yard setbacks of 20 ft for Lots 1 & 11 versus the minimum corner side yard setback requirement of 30 ft as measured from CSAH 15 right -of -way; and WHEREAS, maximum hardcover surfaces allowed in residential zoning districts is 30% of the lot area; and 2 :. WHEREAS, as part of the PDA -CUP, the applicant is proposing a variety of hardcover percentages by lot that range from 22% on the largest lot to 35% on the smallest lots, however, the cumulative hardcover for all lots would meet the 30% maximum requirement; and WHEREAS, as part of the PDA -CUP, flexibility from the fence regulations in the City Code which restricts the height of fences for retaining walls to no more than 42 inches and permit a fence up to 48 inches to be placed on the top of the retaining wall(s) as recommended by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the proposed Woodlyn Ridge major subdivision /preliminary plat, land use and related permit applications at its January 14th meeting and recommends to the Council to approve the PDA -CUP Application for Woodlyn Ridge subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing for review of the PDA -CUP application in accordance with the City Code at its January 22, 2008 meeting. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Development Area Application for the proposed Woodlyn Ridge 11 -unit residential development is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. The 30% maximum hardcover percentage shall be maintained by the eleven (11) lots in total. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to verify and maintain documentation regarding the status of the hardcover calculations. The applicant shall submit a development site plan that visually communicates the maximum hardcover percentages allowed for each individual lot as part of the Final Plat application submittal. b. The proposed retaining wall(s), which shall be located on private property and not the responsibility of the City, will need to be designed and stamped by a licensed structural engineer in the State of Minnesota as is required for wall structures exceeding four (4) feet in height. c. Modifications to the proposed retaining wall including a two - tiered wall and placement of the wall(s) are subject to review and approval by the City of Mound. Applicant is advised that in the event the retaining wall or portion thereof is located within the wetland or buffer area(s), additional permitting may be required. 3 -287- 6 r d. Any retaining wall over four (4) feet in height shall require a fence or railing to be constructed along the top of the wall and shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer. e. A fence up to 48 inches in height on top of the retaining wall(s) is hereby approved as part of the PDA -CUP. f. Payment of any City fees associated with review of the PDA -CUP. g. Approval of the Water Resource Permit including any and /or all conditions referenced in the official resolution. h. Approval of the Preliminary Plat including any and /or all conditions referenced in the official resolution. 2. The PDA -CUP Application is hereby approved for the subject property as depicted on the attached Exhibit A. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus 10 and seconded by CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #08- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE WATER RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR STORMWATER AND EROSION CONTROL FOR THE WOODLYN RIDGE SUBDIVISION AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD WHEREAS, permitting responsibilities for stormwater (MCWD Rule N) and erosion control (Rule B) were transferred from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to the City of Mound on August 22, 2002 following approval of the Mound Surface Water Management Plan by the MCWD Board of Managers; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval of a stormwater and erosion control permit associated with a proposed new residential subdivision at 6301 Lynwood Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the subject site is located on the south side of Lynwood Boulevard in the area between Westedge Boulevard and Robin Lane, near the western edge of Mound; and WHEREAS, the grading and utility plans were reviewed by the City Engineer and Director of Public Works in accordance with the Mound Surface Water Management Plan, City Code Chapter 375, and MCWD Rule N and MCWD Rule D and deemed satisfactory; and WHEREAS, Staff has recommended approval of the water resource permit application for stormwater and erosion control subject to conditions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. The water resource application for stormwater and erosion control is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. Grading Plan shall be modified improve the functioning and placement of the swale in the backyards of Lots 7, 8 and 9 as recommended by City Engineer in Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review memo dated December 13, 2007. 1 :• b. Applicant shall work with the City Engineer to resolve issues with the proposed public access to the stormwater pond located in.rearyards of Lots 5 and 6 prior to submitting a Final Plat application for Woodlyn Ridge as recommended by City Engineer in Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review memo dated December 13, 2007. c. Proposed silt fence shall generally follow constant contours. When this is not possible, the silt fence should be broken and hooked upslope to slow the flow while still allowing overflow. d. Additional silt fence should be provided around the south side of Lots 5 & 6 to slow flow and contain sediment at the top of the hill. Bioroll or silt fence should be provided on Lot 6 south of the building pad (midway down the hill) to form a grade break and slow storm water runoff. e. Temporary ditch checks should be provided in the swales at the lot lines. f. Temporary erosion control blanket is needed on all slopes steeper than 4:1. g. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of MCWD Rule N, MCWD Rule D, City Code Chapters 375, and the Mound Surface Water Management Plan. 2. The water resource permit application is hereby approved for the subject property as depicted on the attached Exhibit A. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January 2008 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus 2 -290- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2008 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #07 -28 PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY PLAT / PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA — CUP WATER RESOURCE PERMIT / WCA AND WETLAND PERMITTING 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD B BENSON GROUP The submitted applications propose 11 single family lots for the 4.18 acre property at 6301 Lynwood Boulevard. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum lot area, width, depth and frontage requirements. The proposed building setbacks are proposed at 25 feet instead of the front yard setback of 30 feet and side ;card setbacks are proposed at z 6 feet on one side and 10 feet on the other. The cor lots abutting Lynwood also are proposed at 20 foot setbacks from Lynwood inste het. The proposed hardcover ranges from 22% to 35% with a cumulative I ver Staff recommends approval of the Major divis�h CUP for a PDA, Preliminary Plat, and Water Resource Permit with conditio a lied in the Planning Report. Brian Benson, 640 Park Street, ayz = NM"" arket of $400- 700,000 is not being met in the Twin Cities. This is the t el" °i e �4 Chuck Alcon, Greenfield, ' N — Frdc%ver issue will be made clear to buyers as a part of purchase documents. A s x the pond for maintenance will not be a problem. He has seen it work in other loca s. He requested clarification that fees are payable at Final Plat resolution. Staff acknowledged his comment and stated that was the assumed standard for Mound. Smith — Retaining wall cannot go into the wetland buffer area without Watershed approval. Cara Otto — Gravity sanitary sewer will work from the south for lots 4 -7. The 2 tiered wall would likely be in the wetland buffer. Brian Benson outlined the Landscape Plan. Chair opened the Public Hearing. Brian Helland, 6261 Ladyslipper Circle — No problem with the general development. Wants to know how the holding pond is going to work; what kind of soil samples will be taken; liability for loss of trees and water damage; what kind of soils used in backfill; and -291- Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 2008 how will excessive storm overflow he handled. Can't handle any more water than what they get now. Randy Olson, 6253 Ladyslipper Circle — How tall is the wall? (12 -13 feet) He felt they were squeezing too many lots into the space. Ten foot variances along Lynwood are too much. Chair closed the Public Hearing. Cara Otto — Each development of a certain size are required to have a pond under State law. Calculations are based on flows from 2, 10 and 100 year storm events in existing and proposed. They then must mitigate the outflow to what the existing flow is; there should be no negative change. They do not design for a catastrophe. The pond will be dug with standard construction equipment. There is a safety "bench ", 10 feet wide and 1 foot in depth incorporated into the pond design. Because of risks associated with fencing, ponds are usually not fenced. Stevens — Questioned viability of tree root system an pectation of more water in backyard. Cara Otto — If the sum pumps run now the p p p y v �conftue to' n. There shouldn't be any more water than what they currently eve. A ertain percentage of the roots need to be injured or destroyed before the tree °'' e They do not use a vertical cut when digging; it's more angular an s m0 e. treet flow is being funneled to the pond by catch basins and storm er ponuis a permanent pool of 4 feet and 2.5 feet for storm collection. If .,. Jeff Miller thought there y uld b4 an bdditional condition stating that the retaining wall would be subject to city an athed review. MOTION by Burma, seconded by Paulsen, to recommend Council approve the major subdivision with conditions as requested. Motion withdrawn. MOTION by Burma, seconded by Paulsen, to recommend Council approve the major subd, prel plat, pda -cup with conditions amending item 10 to specify the retaining walls as private property and adding item 17 that retaining wall placement approvals needed by city and watershed district. Chair Michael re- iterated the need to guarantee that the existing houses will not be adversely affected by the grading and /or water issues. MOTION carried unanimously. -292- PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©® TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Jeff Miller, Staff Planning Consultant DATE: January 8, 2008 MEETING DATE: January 14, 2008 APPLICANT: B. Benson Group REQUEST: Public Hearing - Major Subdivision/Preliminary Plat Planned Development Area — Conditional Use permit (PDA -CUP), , and Water Resource Permit - Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision CASE NUMBERS: 07 -28 HKGi FILE NUMBER: 07 -05 LOCATION: 6301 Lynwood Boulevard PROPERTY ID: 14- 117 -24 -33 -0024 ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential PUBLIC HEARING The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing for review of subdivision/land use application(s) for the property at 6301 Lynwood Boulevard. Members are advised that all publication / mailing / posting requirements have been satisfied in accordance with the City Code. See copy attached. APPLICATION SUMMARY The applicant, B. Benson Group, has submitted applications for Major Subdivision/Preliminary Plat, PCA -CUP and Water Resource Permit for a proposed subdivision, called Woodlyn Ridge. This new residential subdivision proposes 11 single - family lots for the 4.17 -acre property at 6301 Lynwood Boulevard, which is located on the south side of Lynwood Boulevard in the area between Westedge Boulevard and Robin Lane. The property currently contains one single - family house and an accessory storage shed, which are owned by the applicant and would not remain as part of the proposed new residential subdivision, and has two (2) direct driveway accesses to Lynwood. At its October 8, 2007 meeting, the Planning Commission informally reviewed the sketch plan for Woodlyn Ridge and provided input to the applicant. The sketch plan was subsequently reviewed informally by the City Council at its October 23, 2007 meeting. The proposed subdivision includes 11 new single - family lots designed around a new public street that would connect to Lynwood Boulevard with all lots having direct access off of the new street and no lots having direct access to Lynwood Boulevard. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -293- p. 2 407 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 REVIEW TIMELINE(S) Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The PDA -CUP and major subdivision applications were submitted and deemed to be complete on or around November 29, 2007. Within the 60 -day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained for land use applications by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. Because the land use applications were submitted in conjunction with a Major Subdivision/Preliminary Plat, which has an alternate 120 -day timeline, the City may be required to execute an extension if additional time is deemed necessary. Members are advised that the tentative City Council public hearing for review of the Woodlyn Ridge applications has been scheduled for Tuesday, January 22, 2007. PROJECT LAND USE ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan — The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this land for Low Density Residential, which allows single - family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. The subdivision plan proposes 11 detached single - family houses on 4.17 acres, which calculates to a gross density of 2.6 units per acre, so the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's guidance for the Low Density Residential designation. Zoning —The property is located in the R -1 (Single - Family Residential) zoning district, which has the following minimum requirements: • Minimum Lot Area • Minimum Lot Width • Minimum Lot Depth • Minimum Front Yard Setback • Minimum Side Yard Setback • Minimum Rear Yard Setback 10,000 sq ft 60 ft 80 ft 30 ft 10 ft 15 ft Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 60 ft, except that lots fronting on a cul -de -sac shall be 60 ft at the front building setback line. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -294- P. J #07 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 All of the proposed lots meet the minimum lot area, lot width, lot depth and lot frontage requirements. The proposed building setbacks on the preliminary plat do not meet the minimum front yard setback (30 ft) and side yard setback (10 ft) requirements with typical front yard setbacks shown at 25 ft and typical side yard setbacks shown at six (6) ft on one side and ten (10) ft on the other side. All proposed lots would meet the minimum rear yard setback requirement of 15 ft. The two corner lots, Lot 1 & Lot 11, also do not meet the minimum corner side yard setback of 30 ft as measured from CSAH 15. Both lots are proposed with 20 ft setbacks from CSAH 15 right -of -way. Maximum hardcover surfaces allowed in residential zoning districts is 30% of the lot area. The preliminary plat is proposing lots with varying hardcover percentages per lot that range from 22% to 35 %. The cumulative hardcover for all lots is 30 %. The applicant is requesting approval of a PDA -CUP to allow these setback and hardcover requirements. PDA Concept Plan — The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Development Area (PDA) Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in accordance with City Code Chapter 350.460 for the proposed residential subdivision. The owner or owners of any tract or tracts of land in the residential district may submit to the City Council for approval, a plan for the use and development of such a tract of land as PDA by making application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) authorizing completion of the project according to the plan. The plan for the proposed project shall conform to the requirements of the use district within which the land is located. The number of dwelling units proposed for the entire site shall not exceed the total number permitted under the density control provision for the use district within which the land is located. The purpose of the PDA -CUP process is to provide a method by which parcels of land in the Residential Use Districts having unusual building characteristics due to subsoil conditions, topographic conditions, elevation of water table, unique environmental considerations, or because of the parcel's unusual shape or location in relationship to lakes, trees or other natural resources requires more unique and controlled platting techniques to protect and promote the quality of life in the City. In granting a CUP for a PDA, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Section 350.525 of the Zoning Ordinance contains specific standards and conditions relating to granting a CUP that shall be considered by the City Council and Planning Commission. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -295- r p. 4 #07.25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 The applicant is requesting approval of a PDA -CUP to enable site design flexibility and variety for an unusual site due to its irregular shape, the resulting lot geometries, the site's topography, the location of the traveled versus platted centerline of the adjacent CSAH 15 roadway, and the fact that this project is an infill residential development bounded on three (3) sides by existing residential development and on the fourth side by a County Road. During construction of CSAH 15, the platted centerline was not adhered to resulting in a traveled centerline that is located south of the platted centerline and therefore crowds the northern property line of the proposed development site. The preliminary plat proposes smaller front yard setbacks of 25 ft and side yard setbacks of 6 ft and 10 ft (alternating) as previously approved for the Langdon Trails neighborhood. Similar side setbacks of 6 and 10 ft were also allowed in the Langdon Bay development. The reduced setbacks would enable larger buffer and backyard areas between the new residential lots and existing adjacent residential lots. In addition, the applicant is proposing a variety of hardcover percentages by lot that range from 22% on the largest lot to 35% on the smallest lots. The cumulative hardcover for all lots is 30 %. This approach to hardcover control will allow the developer and builders the flexibility to design and build homes with unique architecture yet maintain the overall development architecture standards, such as varying garage types and varying driveway configurations /sizes, to achieve variability and individuality of homes as viewed from the street. The challenge for the City and the builders may be the monitoring and enforcement of the varying hardcover percentages as homes are designed and constructed individually. The City would need to monitor hardcover compliance at the time of building permit submittal and refer to the approved maximum hardcover percentage for each individual lot. Wetlands — The City of Mound is the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) for wetlands in accordance with the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350.1100 includes local wetland regulations. A wetlands delineation report was prepared by Kjolhaug Environmental Services and a copy of the report was submitted to the City of Mound for review in September 2007. Members are advised that the "Wetland Conservation Act Decision Notice" accepting the boundary determination was approved by Mark Perry of Bolton & Menk on October 3, 2007. The delineated wetlands have been included on the submitted preliminary plat completed by Otto Associates, dated 11/28/07. A small portion of an existing wetland adjacent to the east side of the property is located on the subject property and the Butternut Road right -of -way remnant. Another existing wetland is located immediately south of the subject property but no portion of it is actually located on the subject property. The required buffer width for a wetland of this size (one acre or less) is 16.5 ft. The minimum buffer width along a wetland is allowed to range from 50% to 150% of the requirement in order to provide flexibility and encourage a natural appearance. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax(612)338 -6838 -296- P. S #07 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 The preliminary plat proposes a wetland buffer area that varies in width but is within the minimum buffer width range of 8.25' to 16.75'. As discussed with BMI Soil Scientist Mark Perry, the applicant will be required to request a "WCA No Impact or Loss" Decision Notice. " As no work is being undertaken in the wetland(s) (with the exception of the wetland buffer) it is Staff's position that a local wetland permit is not necessary but will further comment on this item at the meeting. Water Resource Permit. ( Stormwater and Erosion Control). According to City Code Chapter 375, the project requires approval of a Water Resource Permit for stormwater and erosion control. While Planning Commission review is not required, the Water Resource Permit application is being reviewed concurrently with the land use application(s) as Planning Commission input is valuable prior to Council review. The applicant submitted the Combined Joint Notification Form for Water Resource Application to the City on December 26, 2007. The applicant also provided copies of the permit application materials to the MCWD, DNR and the Army Corps of Engineers as stated in the Combined Joint Notification Form. As of this report, no comments have been received by the City. Details regarding the proposed stormwater improvements are contained in the applicant's narrative and depicted on the project plans. Members of Staff and the applicant's development team will be present to respond to questions regarding the stormwater system(s) proposed for the site. Trees /Landscaping - The submitted site survey indicates the presence of existing trees and substantial woodland areas. Section 350.725 Subd 7 of the City's Zoning Ordinance contains tree preservation regulations that are intended to preserve wooded areas throughout the City and retain, as far as practicable, substantial existing tree cover. The proposed grading plan will impact many of the existing trees on the site. The most significant area of woodlands existing on the site is on the eastern edge. The applicant's landscape plan proposes a variety of overstory and evergreen trees to provide a vegetated buffer on the site's eastern and western boundaries between the proposed homes and the existing homes on the adjacent properties, along CSAH 15, within the wetland buffer, and eleven (11) maple trees along the proposed street. Park Land Dedication — Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The applicant proposes fees in lieu of park land given the location of the subdivision and the size of the site. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -297- r p. 6 #07 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS Storm Water - Stormwater runoff and ponding issues will need to be consistent with the Mound Surface Water Management Plan and City Code Chapter 375 and will require approval by the Mound City Council. Due to the steep topography on portions of the site, the applicant's project engineer has completed preliminary stormwater management calculations. These preliminary calculations were used to help determine the potential number of lots and the location /sizing of the stormwater pond. The proposed stormwater treatment pond needs to have vehicular access to enable future maintenance needs and the existing slopes in this area are quite steep. The applicant's proposal for pond maintenance access between Lot 5 and Lot 6 is problematic because it would require that the City use a "track" vehicle to traverse the steep slopes down to the pond. The alternative access would be via an existing 20 -foot drainage & utility easement between Lots 5 & 6 of the Langdon Bay development to the south. This easement was established for the storm sewer line and structures that were constructed as part of the Langdon Bay project. However, it is a public drainage & utility easement so it could be available for any public drainage or utility purpose, including pond maintenance. If the developer is unable to devise a more reasonable access to the pond and this existing access would be used, it would be advisable to inform these existing Langdon Bay residents of future City pond maintenance access needs. Streets /Pathways — The proposed 50 ft street right -of -way width and the proposed 28 ft width for back -to -back curb distance meets the City's minimum street design standards. The proposed 50 ft right -of -way radius and 41 ft back -of -curb radius for the cul -de -sac also meet the City's minimum street design standards. The applicant is not proposing sidewalks for this street which is consistent with the design of non - through streets in the adjacent Langdon Bay and Langdon Trails residential developments. The proposed street access to CSAH 15 is located approximately 100 ft west of the existing Rambler Lane access on the opposite side of County Road 15. The County's requirements for right -of -way dedication, site lines and easements have been successfully resolved and are reflected on the preliminary plat. The City's Subdivision Ordinance Section 330.130 Subd. 11 requires that all plats with lots or tracts abutting on collector, minor arterial, state trunk highways, municipal state -aid street and county roads shall have concrete sidewalks installed between the lot line and the aforementioned streets in accordance with City specifications. In addition, this section of County Road 15 currently has a bike lane on each side of the street. The preliminary plat proposes adequate right - of -way dedication to accommodate a future trail /sidewalk along CSAH 15. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax(612)338 -6838 p. 7 #07 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 Utilities /Grading — City sewer and water is available from CSAH 15. The Utility Plan shows water service brought into the development from CSAH 15 and provided to each of the eleven lots. The Utility Plan currently proposes sanitary sewer service also being brought in from CSAH 15 via gravity flow line for lots 1 -3 and 8 -11, whereas, lots 4 -7 would be connected to the gravity flow line with a force main and grinder pumps for each of these four lots. It is proposed that the property owners be responsible for their individual grinder pumps and that the City be responsible for the force main. The City Engineer has concluded that the force main/grinder pumps approach is not acceptable and strongly recommends that all lots be served by a gravity flow system if at all possible. The applicant's engineer is working with the City Engineer to connect lots 4 -7 to a gravity flow line brought in from the existing sewer line in Sugar Mill Lane to the south. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the sketch plan application and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Parks Superintendent Fackler No issues. Police Chief Kurtz No issues. Public Works Supt. Skinner No comments. City Engineer Faulkner - See attached memo dated December 13, 2007, regarding Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review. - Recommend that the wall, which will need to be designed by a structural engineer, be considered for a two - tiered design so as to lessen the severe height concern. The engineer will also need to provide a design to assure its constructability without impacting the adjacent house foundations. There should also be a requirement of the developer that the wall be constructed with the overall site grading and utility work and that the developer include language to future buyers as part of their purchase agreements indicating that the retaining wall is not a "city" wall and will be the property owners' responsibility. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -299- p. 8 407 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim PlatIPDA -CUP January 8, 2008 - A special requirement should be placed on Lot 6 indicating an acceptable grading plan be prepared by a professional engineer to assure that the proposed house and wall can be constructed in an acceptable and safe manner. - Additional comments received via email on January 10, 2008 are summarized below: After discussing this plan with Carlton & Ray earlier today, I would like to revise some of my previous comments which are below: • The first paragraph of comments previously provided are still appropriate. • The three of us feel the proposed gravity sanitary sewer line should be placed in the 20' easement between Lots 5 and 6. The last section of sanitary sewer line should be directionally drilled from south of the treatment pond to the existing sanitary sewer line in Sugar Mill Rd. • The proposed storm sewer line running to the pond should be located along the east side of Lot 6. If feasible, the emergency overflow path from the cul- de -sac should be located within the easement between Lots 5 and 6. • Mound Staff and consultants would like to pursue further discussion with developer and/or representative regarding proposed retaining wall. Wetlands Specialist Perry - Recommends that a wetland buffer be provided that would be continuous all the way along the proposed retaining wall between the wall and the property boundary. - Has suggested that a conservation easement from the south edge of the retaining wall following southwest along the storm pond to the woods and then continuing west along the woods to the property boundary and then northward to the wooded area be provided. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -300- P. 9 #07 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director As part of the sketch plan process, the applicant informed the Commission and City Council that one of the significant issues mentioned at the neighborhood meeting was drainage and commented that the need for a conservation easement for woodlands along the wetland may not be merited due to the low quality of the trees. Additionally, tree removal was discussed and the applicant indicated that a detailed landscaping plan would be prepared and that they planned to preserve as many significant trees as possible. In general, the Commission and Council were open to the developer's suggestion. Staff will further comment on this item at the meeting. Hennepin County Transp. Dept. - The drainage and utility easements along CSAH 15 should also include a documented trail easement - An approved Hennepin County permit will be required for any construction taking place within the County's right -of -way. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the Major Subdivision, CUP for a Planned Development Area (PDA), Preliminary Plat, Water Resource Permit, and CUP for a Wetland Conservation Act Permit requests for the Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. Submission of a certified copy of the resolution that vacated the half of that portion of Butternut Road adjacent to this property in 2001 and subsequent transfer of the vacated parcel to this plat prior to filing a Final Plat application for Woodlyn Ridge. 2. The 30% maximum hardcover percentage shall be maintained by the eleven (11) lots in total. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to verify and maintain documentation regarding the status of the hardcover calculations. The applicant shall submit a development site plan that visually communicates the maximum hardcover percentages allowed for each individual lot as part of the Final Plat application submittal. 3. Utility Plan shall be modified to provide a gravity sanitary sewer system rather than a forcemain system to meet City Engineer's recommendations outlined in Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review memo dated December 13, 2007, including adequate drainage & utility easement adjustments to accommodate the shifting of the sanitary sewer line. 4. Payment of all required utility fees at the current approved rates prior to release of the 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -301- P. 10 #07 -25 Woodlyn Ridge Prelim Plat /PDA -CUP January 8, 2008 resolution: Water Trunk Area Charge (WTAC) - $2,000 /unit, Sewer Trunk Area Charge (STAG) - $2,000 /unit. Payment of water service connection fee - $240 /unit, and sewer service connection $240 /unit fee as part of building permit. Payment of SAC fees as part of the building permit. 5. Grading Plan shall be modified improve the functioning and placement of the swale in the backyards of Lots 7, 8 and 9 as recommended by City Engineer in Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review memo dated December 13, 2007. 6. Preliminary Plat shall be modified to incorporate the swale area within the backyards of Lots 7, 8 and 9 into the drainage & utility easements for these three lots. 7. Preliminary Plat shall be modified to add a trail easement within the proposed drainage & utility easements along CSAH 15 to accommodate a future county trail. 8. Applicant shall work with the City Engineer to resolve issues with the proposed public access to the stormwater pond located in rear yards of Lots 5 and 6 prior to submitting a Final Plat application for Woodlyn Ridge as recommended by City Engineer in Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review memo dated December 13, 2007. 9. An approved Hennepin County permit will be required for any construction taking place within CSAH 15 right -of -way. 10. The proposed retaining wall(s) will need to be designed and stamped by a licensed struc ural'engineer in the State of Minnesota as is required for wall structures exceeding four (4) feet in height. 11. Park dedication requirement shall be fulfilled by cash payment in lieu of land in accordance with City Code. 12. Drainage & utility easements, as required by the City Engineer, shall be provided and submitted in a form so as to allow for recording at Hennepin County and shall be subject to review and approval by the City. 13. Payment of any City fees for review of the Major Subdivision, CUP for a Planned Development Area (PDA), Preliminary Plat, Water Resource Permit, and Wetland Conservation Act Permit applications. 14. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this land use action in the event the major subdivision is approved. 15. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit applications, when appropriate. 16. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -302- NOTICE OF A CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER PRELIMINARY PLAT /MAJOR SUBDIVISION AND PDA -CUP APPLICATIONS FOR THE PROPERTY AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 PM or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, January 22, 2008, to review the preliminary plat/major subdivision for a proposed 11 -lot subdivision of the property located at 6301 Lynwood Boulevard. The applicant, the Brian Benson Group, is also requesting Planned Development Area — Conditional Use Permit (PDA -CUP) approval to allow for reduced setbacks and an alternative method to calculate hardcover. Other related land use and /or permit application(s) associated with the proposed subdivision, including but not limited to, a Water Resource Permit and wetland permit(s) may also be considered as part of the public hearing. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Information regarding the public hearing or proposed project is available for viewing at City Hall during regular office hours or by appointment. Additionally, questions can be directed to Community Development Director Sarah Smith at 952.472.0604 or www .sarahsmitha- citvofmound.com. Jill Norlander Planning and Building Inspections Published in the Laker on January 12, 2008 -303- I MAJOR SUBDIVISION r - APPLICATtON 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 5364 Phone 952 - 472-0600 FAX 952- 472-0620 Planning Commission Date Ca NO. _ 1 V29 2007 City Council Date FEES MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION Cl %y �F A40 Win CHECK BOX TYPE OF APPLICATION FEE SKETCH PLAN REVIEW $200• Name of Proposed Plat Lotfy t4_ Block f[ Subdivision [hr,f,� PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 . $350 +$15 per lot * LEGAL FINAL PLAT $350 +$15 per lot * CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ PDA /�� V $350 ` // V ESCROW DEPOSIT $5,000 ` VARIANCE $200 * '_other. TOTAL $ -k * CALL THE MOUND PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO CONFIRM CURRENT FEES. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE_ PROPERTY Subject Address / -3sy INFO Name of Proposed Plat Lotfy t4_ Block f[ Subdivision [hr,f,� T �-))%LACe EXISTING LEGAL PID# q / t -1 k © n.21 Zone DESCRIPTION -3Z APPLICANT The applicant's: downer '_other. Name Address -2o NIc.) 'cc Phone Home Work SA- A/72 -)Oi�,n 4t;( L / Fax Name - Address P- OWNER (If other than Akol_x applicant) Phone Home Wo Fax Name c7 C cS Address es t�9� She, —I � � ENGINEER Phone Home work-741 mac f�4 k% A-) Fax'43 6 29' Major Subdivision Information (12/29/2005) Page 4 of 5 -304- Description of Proposed User EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. t� V o `L'A l �Q S ;� %� �. ~�' l J ,►11�c�'K c J- i�Pa t lT If applicable, a.development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Number of Structures: Number of Dwelling Units/Structure: H _ Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: J co u sq. ft. Total Lot Area:; ! 7 Has an application ever peen made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( vrno. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided (including Section 330 of the Mound City Ordinance) and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. tint Applicant's Name Applicants Signature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Print Owner's Name Major Subdivision Information (12/29/2005) Page 5 of 5 Owner's Signature -305- Date November 30, 2007 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN. 55364 Attn: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Subj: Preliminary Plat Submission for Woodlyn Ridge PDA -CUP Encl: 1) Major Subdivision Application (Preliminary Plat/PDA) with Fees and Escrow Deposit 2) Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Plat with Utility Plan, Grading Plan, Street Plan, Landscape Plan and Sample Architecture/ Floor Plan Exhibits 3) Mailing Labels 1. Enclosures 1) and 2) are hereby forwarded for your review and approval. A PDA -CUP approach is requested for this 11 lot single family residential development due to the irregular shape of the lot, the resulting lot geometries, the lot topography, the traveled versus platted centerline of the adjacent 60unty road, CSAH 15, and the fact that this is an in -fill residential development project bounded on three sides by existing residences and on the fourth side by the county road; use of the PDA - CUP approach will provide for the necessary platting options and result in the maximum taxable market value for the newly created residences. Enclosure 3) is provided for the required 350' notice to neighbors. 2. Comments with respect to the details of this Preliminary Plat are as follows: a. Neighborhood Meeting- A neighborhood meeting was successfully completed on September 19, 2007 with 13 neighbors in attendance out of 66 notices mailed; their comments relative to storm water management and buffering have been addressed in this submission in the grading plan and the landscape plan. b. Park Dedication- A cash contribution in accordance with the City fee schedule in lieu of a land dedication is proposed as this approach seems to make the most sense given the location of the plat and the size of the property. c. Wetland Delineation- The required wetland delineation was completed and the Kjolhaug Environmental Services Report dated October 1, 2007 was accepted by the City. The wetland delineation is located and referenced on the Preliminary Plat; buffer averaging has been applied to best accommodate the wetland buffer requirements with the wetland location and adjacent topography. d. CSAH 15- Referring to Hennepin County Transportation Department letter dated October 3, 2007, the site lines and -306- ROW /Easement issues have been successfully resolved and are reflected on the plat. The issue of the traveled centerline versus the platted centerline is addressed below. e. Storm Water Pond Maintenance Access- Access to the proposed storm water pond for maintenance purposes is in two directions; between lots 5 & 6 to the south from the cul -de -sac for track vehicles and to the north for other vehicles via the drainage & utility easement between lots 5 & 6 in Langdon Bay. f. Butternut Vacation- On July 24, 2001 the City Council by resolution 01 -62 vacated that portion of Butternut adjacent to this property and subsequently transferred half of the street to the Langdon Bay plat. The balance of that vacation now needs to be transferred to this plat. Otto Associates has reviewed the legal description in Resolution 01 -62 and determined that all of Butternut was vacated by that resolution. A certified copy of the resolution vacating the half adjacent to this property and transferring that parcel to this plat will be required for the filing of the Final Plat, further details regarding the vacation resolution and transfer process will be provided later. g. Preliminary Plat- This PDA -CUP Preliminary Plat proposes to incorporate setback and hardcover features which will provide for architectural flexibility and variety, and, optimum home placement on the lots to best utilize the lot geometry and dimensions. The front setback is proposed at 25' and the side setbacks are proposed at 6' and 10' alternating as previously approved in Langdon Trails and Langdon Bay. This provides for additional buffer and backyard area while maximizing the lot widths for the residence and retaining rear access for fire purposes. The platted center line for CSAH 15 was not followed during road construction resulting in a traveled center line that crowds the property line on the entire northern edge. The proposed dedication of 40' of ROW and a 10' easement from the traveled centerline satisfies the County requirements but the 30' side setback from this new line unnecessarily penalizes the lot width dimension of Lots 4 and 7. To correct this county road construction anomaly, the side lot setback for Lots 1 and 11 is proposed at 20'. In addition, one of the challenges for an in -fill development of this size and geometry is to design and build the homes with architecture that is unique yet conforms to the development architecture standards with varying driveway sizes and configurations, and varying garage types, front load, side load, etc.; in other words variability and individuality as viewed from the street. Referring to the Plat, we are proposing hardcover maximum percentages and square foot cover on a lot by lot basis with the overall cumulative hardcover for all lots at the 30% maximum requirement. This approach will allow an option for maximum design flexibility for the smaller lots and each building -307- h. 0 design can be monitored for hard cover compliance at the time of building permit submittal. As an example of what this can mean in terms of flexibility for the buyer /builder, please refer to the attached exhibits of street views with this flexibility. The smaller sites, ranging in size from 10,031 to 10,959 square feet are proposed for a maximum hardcover allowance of 35 %. This slight increase will allow for side entry garage designs and the necessary footprint that today's buyers demand. Exhibits A & B represent two examples of the side entry garage concept and marketable footprints. Example C shows an example of a garage blended back into the home design. All of these representations reflect the Developer's vision for Woodlyn Ridge. If a 30% hardcover percentage is required on the smaller size sites, this forces the buyer /builder to sacrifice driveway and garage orientation in order to maintain the necessary footprint. Example D shows an example of this. While most cost effective, such designs are less desirable with today's buyers and are not considered timeless designs. Top compensate for the higher hardcover allowance on the smaller sites, the larger site cover allowances have been reduced (see Plat table). While the future buyers may or may not elect to take advantage of this option, the Developer plans to encourage use of these hardcover variations to ach—ieve fhe architectural vision for the development. Grading Plan- The grading plan and associated storm water calculations indicate that the storm water rate of flow of the property in the natural state has been maintained or reduced after the grading for the development and with the addition of the storm water ponding. In addition, the runoff on the Northwest corner has been directed toward the adjacent property culvert next to the street and the pond on the southeast corner will substantially reduce runoff to the wetland behind lot 7. Wetland buffer averaging has been applied to the wetland boundaries along lots 6 & 7. Utility Plan- The utility plan provides the design for sanitary sewer and water service to the 11 new lots. The water service will be brought into the development from CSAH 15 and provided to each lot as noted. The sanitary sewer service will also be brought into the development from CSAH 15 and provided as follows: 1) Sanitary sewer with gravity flow will be provided for lots 1 -3 and 8- 11; 2) Sanitary sewer with grinder pumps will be provided for lots 4- 7 with a force main connecting these services to the gravity line to CSAH 15. It is proposed that the residents be responsible for their individual grinder pumps and that the City be responsible for the force main ( Note: The possibility of these four lots being on a gravity line to Langdon Bay was reviewed and deemed unacceptable since the depth crossing the wetland would be only 5.5 feet and the depth in the adjacent Langdon Bay lot utility easements would be 13.5 feet, a depth easily bored using a directional bore but unrealistic for future maintenance given the limited width of the adjoining utility easements). L Street Plan- The street plan is self explanatory; final road sections will be determined when the construction plans are prepared and after soil borings are analyzed, these borings are scheduled concurrent with the residence demolition in January 2008. It was determined that sidewalks would not be required at the Sketch Plan review. k. Landscape Plan- The existing buffering via currently established on -site vegetation is sparse on the western boundary consisting of scrub trees and Sumac; the southern boundary is fully exposed to the Langdon Bay development due to the elevation difference and the lack of any substantial trees on the slope or in the Langdon Bay development. The eastern boundary does have a thicker buffer with scrub trees. One house presently exists on that property and some of that buffer will be retained. The neighbor across the street adjacent to Rambler Lane expressed concern relative to headlights in their front room due to their lower elevation and the position of Woodlyn Court; two spruce trees for their front area are proposed with location to be decided by the property owner. The landscape plan itself provides for buffer along CSAH 15, the western boundary interface between this development and the adjacent neighbors, the southern exposure to the Langdon Bay development, and the eastern property line. A conservation easement approach is not considered necessary for this area and unnecessarily restricts the flexibility of the property owners for future plantings. I. Building Permits- Two early start building permits for Lots 1 & 11 are requested; these lots are adjacent to CSAH 15 for fire safety purposes and an early start will enable the builders to complete the models for the Fall 2008 parade. Certificates of Occupancy will not be requested until the Woodlyn Court roadway and the utilities are complete and tested. m. Project Schedule- Barring any further deterioration in the single family housing market, the project schedule is: 1) P Plat approval January 2008; 2) F Plat approval March 2008; 3) Development construction and first model home construction May 2008; 4) Complete development construction June 2008; 5) Parade of homes September 2008. 3. The comments above summarize the key points of this Preliminary Plat submission; approval of the plat with the comments as noted is requested. Chuck Alcon, Project Manager, Woodlyn Ridge Cc: B. Benson Group, LLC (Brian Benson) Otto Associates (Cara Otto) -309- COMBINED JOINT NOTIFICATION FORM — WA Use this form to notify /apply to the City of Mound, their engineering coi Watershed District of a proposed water /wetland project or work that should advise you of their requirements within 10 days. Fill out this maps, etc. to the City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55, YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED AUTHORIZATI E APPLICATION Itants, the D0 ani9 the innehaha Creek > wit heir�urisdiction. These agencies m e e f j Mopail copy, with plan, Keep a copy for your r cords. APPLICANT NAME E2 6e—nSC>f'N ro APPLICANT ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP fir; C1-1 iE- t'-� (I J\ +.1 55 ,39 PROJECT ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP (030l L Mtc?COaCI `-8DL' 0. Lt dl N 3!c PROPERTY I.D. NUMBER H- a 3- o-.)Ly LENGTH OF SHORE AFFECTED (FT) tJ VOLUME OF FILL OR EXCAVATION (CY) N� A AREA FILLED OR EXCAVATED IS ACRES, OR SQUARE FEET. TYPE OF PERMIT BEING APPLIED FOR: (Check all that apply) ❑ FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION ❑ STORM SEWER OUTFALLS ❑ WETLAND ®„OTHER(S) yjc, r APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: (Licensed Contractor, Engineer, etc) C+4-c;, A SsoG i c,4e -S, (r L ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP n f%4> c1 WeSk D% V, o M N SS-t' 1 ;� PROJECT PURPOSE (Why is this project needed — what benefits will it provide ?) i >Zs t i Sv [_7G i J' S' ►� ALTERNATIVES (Describe any other sites or methods that could be used to achieve the purpose of your project while avoiding or minimizing water /wetland impacts. Attach additional sheets, if needed. V"\ o n e— to d i Ag—v ► C2� q 01 Cx ,m DATES: Proposed start of activity: Sp cl-3 .20�8 Proposed completion: (Identify any completed work on attached drawing.) NAMES & ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS (Attach list if more) PERMITS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ® OR APPLIED FOR (A) FROM DNR k_ ARMY CORPS OF ENGR COUNTY CITY MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY I hereby notify the recipients of this form of the project proposed herein and request I be advised of any permits or other determinations concerning this project that I must obtain. I understand that proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may be subject to Federal, State and /or local administrative, civil and /or criminal penalties. 0AIA 4, A 6 IZf -ZI Signature of Pers n Proposing Project or Agent Date -310- INSTRUCTIONS - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY A copy of this form, with copies of all plans, drawings, etc. should be sent to each agency indicated below. Please check the appropriate spaces to show everywhere you are sending this form. Remember to keep a copy for your records. ✓ Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) ✓ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Regional Office V' US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) at: Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District - ATTN: CO -R, 190 Fifth Street East, St. Paul, MN 55101 -1638 Note: The agencies above may provide a copy of your completed form to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). MPCA water quality issues may apply to your proposed project. ATTENTION (from USDA): Any activity including drainage, dredging, filling, leveling or other manipulations, including maintenance, may affect a landuser's eligibility for USDA benefits under the 1985 Food Security Act as amended. Check with you local USDA office to request and complete Form AD -1026 prior to initiating activity: IMPORTANT: Some agencies, including the Corps of Engineers and the MDNR accept this form as a permit application form. If you wish this form to constitute an application to the Corps and /or MDNR for any necessary permits for your projects please carefully read the following information and sign where indicated. Application is hereby made for a permit to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activity or I am acting as the duly authorized agent of the applicant. (AAa Ad)44n- (L LI ID--) Signature oKApp llcant Date Signature of Applicant Date Note: The person who desires to undertake the proposed activity must sign the application (Applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the information requested below is provide. Agent's Name & Title: La-lea �,c-h "o 0 -4+o7 Agent's Address: ua - �l ✓;S; o� �" f3b A � AA 1�3 65313 Agent's Telephone: (7�12) LA - zi 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. -311- ^'� •��c o- �' ?� +�' � � �� �, eo'�3 vow >,:1p°r_! °?r'� {.Ee.[d� � L _ err[e, � i ssvt or lie, wo see Y �•. WSW. or,[s s\ �'W�- ,�,�,�, a°° • / [� •°` . o•"YZl iN.w, r� r \ �_ s w �[s` :L — _ I— n (win to— 4 O tl � �`z• s` 1 31pW'g76 r lows I of all ssae, MA Iva AS 116ZA zgMIIO .11 Iy' 650ae• � � (. I/ . r Z \ 0°n0H x3 osnoH x3 '+ -� > awe, ,�j��d � o 7e.L: 10rae \ �. nrw� a1[ae• \ L_ G O °O / ( / ••� / \_. \j __ i ,axss O o ° orroOOOO o° O °OO °0° LB6 <�/4N� ! / • ...00 a o o � % ° o � o °o ° ° °o` J rozw / ' /I 1v D3a3 [tzar { p 0o2ee `x\ �° • j/ � s/ � _.1`"`�'^�i 18L�{ ..-- --' "� }• /YD � i I I i }(y(( : 1�^t �A� I ° S � Ll� .. .J. J i �,b \�' - �, �I �" �`• �� f _ J FF l /I JS 91 , ran, ,! it I I 0 -9LOb! u•eo0,. "'"'�n �sn .w ,elf .x3c. 1 I OI ••6066 dW0, d7 W6 ` 6 � / 9 I i0Yt10t � _— -- —• 9F{ iul i . #� � 9 sszw m �S SF1'01 r - ,i a �I evsaw • mpa,,D. ><Yn I I ,sO,H +3 e 11 •••r LB "„AOtMN3 I l W O J R �"' '��°' os'IOQt - / a uor , '• - I a °a,o, . 'd'"r`r / ,,pp,i Z �.( �, rl / � I 1 ;'� f "�°tz,_ •pM.._ I r sa,ral..1�t00� —b` � cr',x, � Vol x3 J ! : j n°13' t'et1Dl oq va V � r '3$` {3'ib{ ca u0r • b i / /YL'B6 3 rrtcs • 1 rOW.Zt 7 Naw,Y i L9'166 M o � � 1 ; �• l I � �I I , i Q i I � wz r:as- .,saa, � �� / a W-C96- Ill 9Y Z66- N ' v ,�t�� 01 --+ j � � ; I ; oil m \may n a w'may . *A Aj,116 y 9Ja0 ago7urmuus,e xa U) m Z m Z o N N b N' O CD O W N =s T Pie j to g I p = II2a= $$ �1 1 1 Ppg Fq � r q O 8 ~2 '. , rt rw N oat 1-- — 9'A GOOM_ I .— I armr or 1 t • f wv°i°°°�DVMSU! — 1M?f� so i SO - ST66 -+ s q1° 1'° X1 ,o•reor eato0, =0'f', D6- �w.xsa nroar q + k' luaamwrn✓b �L. u `7� ,'ST9pt�'ae6 I �l=oR! H°s°uYf ra0r 7.Twi -ON ___- -� < -� !ow esV091 - -"s ;.,Prom wft y r- r- r- rrr r r�rr r� oases �j sw �`"tD11B O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � t, A a u to w SA S-1 S.1 .o 0000 o $fig Ina ° kkkkkkkkkkk 43 0 0 z qN C . 6 � 000 0 a a m2..4 I � yyy� os aa 03 o # O0p q +o Z�2 ZZ i�;•1r � n � ti N jell- n R o �f o g mZ o (n yya m; A�AO -y� m li m -,�pC m M £V I AE, f�'--Nd � O� RI .0 W•J 03 p z 0 o z z 7J ii 0 ..� C Q u G) M -u H m o z N O C y / _ -o M (/) z N O N V O OD N C) P J 4 A 1 J L-TJ / / / / / 9Zt86-W ' ' 9rz66 -�wa >o x +- �' 3EF 1 b'7d 91II98� V ; F. IJ •' OZ y 1 p to Zv _A pp; crc yyz�.ri A � SUP 01 w° 5AM 0 A $ o 2 > � I . pp N m -1 $26 Z° Y FE �x� c rRi sa Mo ��� � •� TZ �Z�VI *�� UI O $0_ ip ;F3' y v �yA1 Z Zimm � m n m m mM I I I I I I I u^oH ' +3 I +sroH s3 I I 6' 96 -wa �spo+ -i +a 1 +3 I 87 3 I I I I I / J / 66bv`N � iL P66 = ^w'3 29'966- At / -dd .eV-'3 QOOMN�� Z ty O ). r ofF to S ti a v � I � � aaMH x3 j� ocncN 3 i aa�wN � 3 7 69�°'�',�ftl 6J xi pmpr \ \' �N �Pa0659E.ncl3 d.1 sso- OacrroN 'x3 ' wow tlfitlfi �c 2 i------ - - - - -- gi �- � A >4a \ \ asneH 'x3 a HN lip %�. r 8 �r 88 2r r i i W O 9 W 0 2 r �fP i rn Z v i sataN 'x3 m oL v asnotr ' 3 !!C .,.Y LBZOOl�cl3 Z Z r ot G) { x o 1rA v 0 1 M �, x 9* MV3 oL'BEE�`�l'3 9LT'BEan�4 L..—ddJ.Zt 3 AbZ66 =uxN -�` am •uo Ma _ ._J rcm _H" 3j 'ON •H-V H) nNnB i aMrA OC .wrvnaW n. xe (SM OWSW) ow off - "a �Bnw�i+N ow -bi aoaEa�.a m ;o $� + m mm O a m A a y (A o U) � �Za2o rt U) Z y D � � a N V CD O W o � •rs-1 pQ Pip C ,. j w Zv cr o .{ Z Z X v G) (n m o G) m O GZ �D U) Z [7 N b i y N' O O V W fJl aW" xj f9)Po • / SY Cl! l 1 y \. e•` \.moo, jai L 1 a(Qp+Ullalltl/K 'NO i \ NrwH x3� I 1 I I asmH •r3 I I 'ON I 1 I � I MM I te P m + H � E � o qp �8 lip App, 0111 P < � �� � Pin Is p toil 1MS.g i g Y�� m 3 'Pill. R It 4A < �g gills p ;g < p �s g8 - \�roago'o A why g C) rl I I J MIN• � r+nN / vmt MN�� -�4 (300 / - anos / RmLY 7 I N ?t laa • -I s •� MYBS 'Oem` Y �: vQn • \ .vxPo law '� �• d' ydorpuc� ill LfII96• 4� ��� I '�Q` K16L• a9 F*a • 'ON I 1 I � I MM I te P m + H � E � o qp �8 lip App, 0111 P < � �� � Pin Is p toil 1MS.g i g Y�� m 3 'Pill. R It 4A < �g gills p ;g < p �s g8 - \�roago'o A why g C) rl I I J MIN• � r+nN / vmt MN�� -�4 (300 / - anos / RmLY 7 I N L M Hardcover Exhibit A © 2005 Frank Betz Associates, Inc. Deck 11jr==-nfiM L --- 0" a Kitchen z, Dew t ------------------------ Foyer 40 fke Dining Rom W.i.c. 12'x 14' Bedroom 4 C) 121. 13, Both c:::] FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR Bedroom 3 12'x 13 - ID -316- Guest Suite Ill. Ill L Goroqe 21'x ------------------------------------ Hardcover Calculations Estimate for Lots 1,2,3,8,9,10,11 House 1490 Garage 770 Driveway Estimate 1075 Deck/Patio 200 Total 3535 Proposed Hardcover (35%) 3535 (35% for Sites 1,2,3,8,9,10,11 Only) -------------------------------- Hardcover Calculations Estimate for Lots 1,2,3,8,9,10,11 House 1590 Garage 770 Driveway Estimate 1025 Deck/Patio 150 Total 3535 1 Proposed Hardcover (35%) 3535 (35% for Sites 1,2,3,8,9, 10,11 Only) -317- C 2005 Frank Betz Associates, Deck Keeping Room F—ly Roan Kt — DWgi R.- 13 x 13 II A W.I.C. C Mud covered P—h "I M R— 1 J4y7- -------- — ------ FIRST FLOOR Garage _�—T 2005 H7Z ASS—TES. Exhibit C -318- Hardcover Exhibit D -319- I Hennepin County Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive 612- 596 -0300, Phone H Medina, MN 55340 -5421 763- 478 -4000, FAX 763- 478 -4030, TDD www.hennepin.us December 12, 2007 Ms. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Preliminary Plat — Woodlyn Ridge CSAH 15, Opposite Rambler Lane Section 14, Township 117, Range 24 Hennepin County Plat No. 3705A Review and Recommendations Dear Ms. Smith: Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. We reviewed the above plat and offer the following comments: • We understand a documented trail easement will be superimposed on the drainage and utility easements along CSAH 15. Given this amenity, we find the plat acceptable as submitted. • Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right of way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail developments, and landscaping. Appropriate forms can be obtained by contacting our Permits Section at (612) 596- 0336. Please direct any response to Dave Zetterstrom at (612) 596 -0355. Sincerel , James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation and County Engineer DKZ /sew !� Cc: Plat Review Committee — Byers / Lindgren / Holtz / Drager / Zetterstrom / Lemke / Fackler Mark Larsen, Hennepin County Surveyor's Office An Equal Opportunity Employer —320— Recycled Paper 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200, Chaska, MN 55318 Telephone: 952 -448 -8838 Facsimile: 952448 -8805 December 13, 2007 Ms. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Proposed Woodlyn Ridge Preliminary Review Dear Ms. Smith: As requested, we have reviewed the preliminary plat submittal for the Woodlyn Ridge site as prepared by Otto Associates and dated November 28, 2007. We offer the following comments for your consideration. Grading Drainaze & Erosion Control: 1. The proposed backyard swales should be enclosed in drainage easements to prevent future homeowner alteration and allow for City maintenance. Additionally, the swales should be moved away from the building pads to the maximum extent practical. 2. The proposed backyard swale behind Lot 7 should be adjusted to direct the runoff around the bottom of the wall and into the "body" of the wetland adjacent to Langdon Bay Lot 26. This is to avoid the potential of increased standing water in the backyard of adjacent Lot 27. 3. The cross -slope of the proposed street entrance from County Road 15 should be adjusted to eliminate its crown to allow storm water to flow to the west and maintain existing drainage patterns along Co. Rd. 15. Proposed point elevations should be provided in the plan to define the drainage patterns at the intersection and prevent the creation of a low point at the southeast corner of the new intersection. 4. The proposed pond maintenance access between Lots 5 & 6 is problematic, as indicated by the developer's narrative stating that a City "track" vehicle would be needed to access the pond down this steep slope. The alternative access is via an existing 20 -foot drainage and utility (D/U) easement between Langdon Bay Lots 5 and 6 to the south. This easement was established for the storm sewer line and structures that were constructed with the Langdon Bay project. However, it is a public D/U easement which makes it available for any public drainage or utility purpose, including pond maintenance. However, it would be advisable to inform these residents of future City pond C.;: \Documents and Setting ,Sarah Smith\Local Setting".\1ernporavy Internet [ files` ' ontent. I1= 5`•, ti0F2BUNC `:tA'oodlyn—Reviets.doc -321- maintenance access needs if the developer cannot devise a more reasonable access to the pond through Woodlyn Ridge. 5. Silt fence should generally follow constant contours. When this is not possible, the silt fence should be broken and hooked upslope to slow the flow while still allowing overflow. 6. Additional silt fence should be provided around the south side of Lots 5 & 6 to slow flow and contain sediment at the top of the hill. Bioroll or silt fence should be provided on Lot 6 south of the building pad (midway down the hill) to form a grade break and slow storm water runoff. 7. Temporary ditch checks should be provided in the swales at the lotlines. 8. Temporary erosion control blanket is needed on all slopes steeper than 4:1. Utility Plans: 1. The proposed 8" DIP watermain is not looped, although water pressure in this area is relatively good, so looping is not necessary for pressure purposes. 2. Pond design calculations were submitted, reviewed and they are acceptable. 3. The proposed sanitary sewer system is not acceptable as currently proposed. A gravity system should be constructed if at all possible. Further analysis and discussion with the developer's engineer is necessary as it appears that a gravity line could be directionally drilled from near the south end of Lots 5 and 6 to the existing line in Sugar Mill Lane, approximately 180 feet. There is an existing 12" RCP storm sewer within this 20 -foot easement but utilizing directional drilling should not impact this existing line. 4. All the required fees will need to be paid prior to building permit issuance at the recently approved rates: Water Trunk Area Charge, WTAC, $2,000 /unit; Sewer Trunk Area Charge, STAC, $2,000 /unit; Sewer Availability Charge, SAC, $1,200 /unit; water service connection fee, $240 /unit; sewer service connection fee, $240 /unit. Please contact our office if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer DMP /dlp C ADocuments and Settings\Sarah SntAW- 1 -ocal Settings' l en4)orary Interncf Piles C:anti nt.IL s`•. b0. F28T .1NC:'•.�Yoodl }71_FtcvIEKV.dOC -322- City of Mound, Benson Group Proposed Development I would like to see the following in the plans: - The wetland buffer be continuous all the way along the proposed retaining wall between the wall and the property boundary. Establishment of a conservation easement from the south edge of the retaining wall following southwest along the storm pond to the woods and then continuing west along the woods to the property boundary and then northward to the wooded area (see attached figure). -323- • � r �y�i, ► .P nw � �e, I% 1 (n.L.o.f1.1 f. 4•v. � Aae+e1•- m r ,, ,,,_ –� _ �� C... ? � � �� �� •– ••----- •^-ta�c�ii�""W"'–�01'„ ae'wy'n°� i A``P 5 �. .,, — — ..I •' 8 AIR anb •R svqoov is 14 omits 1 i r ,e / I .,ear, � •a •� gyp' i -� a art OWN r ' a1a0• � wa.a,am,eA1 %y$ It• � T�j(r���w� O ....a �y�, � ` � fI I • NWy_ 1 ••� MI \ G 1PIP.� • -�E /. Raf f wvlli l waRw J AVM L ` �� 1' l l l / aQ • �'sw \ i°.A4�yia B' �� �. +�.�•.� •"'� T1 ... 10 / / / //iL .� �L \IUN [A tbl�A \ l 40 . \ LQ .tre, ti nGY ru if t- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -325- Executive Summary � r Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©® TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Jeff Miller, Consulting City Planner DATE: January 16, 2008 SUBJECT: PC Case #07 -27, Sketch Plan Review for the portion of the Halstead Pointe residential development proposed in Mound - a 9 -unit housing development proposed for the existing manufactured home court property on the south side of Bartlett Boulevard (CSAH 110) in the southwest corner of Mound as part of a much larger 36 -unit housing development proposed on property in Mound & Minnetrista APPLICATION SUMMARY At its January 14, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the revised sketch plan for Halstead Pointe that proposes a 36 -unit housing development for the existing manufactured home court property located on the south side of Bartlett Boulevard (CSAH 110) in the southwest corner of Mound and adjacent properties in Minnetrista. Approximately 3 acres of the overall 12.5 -acre site lies within Mound and the sketch plan proposes nine (9) single - family lots with detached houses for the Mound portion of the site. Single - family detached `Bayhomes" have replaced the twinhomes that were proposed in the previous sketch plan that was reviewed in May 2007; however, the number of housing units remains the same for the Mound portion of the development. The Bayhome units are clustered together in order to increase the preservation of the site's existing natural features (bluff and trees), views of the lake and shared open spaces. The sketch plan proposes to plat these lots as individual condominium lots with more than 50% of the property platted as common open space. Access for the development would be via a new private street off of CSAH 110 for the seven (7) units above the bluff and via existing Halstead Avenue for the two (2) lakeshore units. An overview of the proposed sketch plan application is contained in the Planning Report and support materials which have been included as attachment(s). PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW / DISCUSSION In general, PC members were complimentary of the improvements made to the proposed development since they last reviewed it in May 2007. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 19W-T The applicant was asked to clarify their plans for having docks as part of this development. Mr. Zweber responded that they anticipate that they would be allowed two (2) day docks with no overnight boat storage. The submitted sketch plan does not show any docks. The permitting process for docks would be under jurisdiction of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD). PC members discussed concerns about the proposed development's 36 households having lakeshore access via the small lakeshore site in the Mound portion of the site. Questions about the nature of the private shared open space, gazebo and trails proposed for the lakeshore site that is adjacent to an existing single - family lakeshore home. The applicant explained that the placement of the open space area on the west side of the Lakeshore site also would preserve views of the lake from the proposed homes above the bluff. For this reason, the applicant would prefer not to remove or shift the open space on the Lakeshore site. However, the applicant did show an alternate sketch where the lakeshore gazebo is shifted to the east side of the lakeshore site. Community Development Director Smith reminded the PC that the lakeshore is private land, not under the jurisdiction of the City but the potential impacts of the lakeshore development on existing neighbors need to be considered. CC members are advised that the owners /occupants of the adjacent lakeshore residential property to the west of the lakeshore open space area (6641 Halstead Avenue) have submitted a letter to the City that outlines their concerns abouTocating the trail and gazebo adjacent to their property and recommends that the City deny this element of the sketch plan. See attached letter. In addition, the property owner & resident of 6655 Halstead Avenue expressed his concerns about the proposed lake access for 36 homes and the number of people that would potentially be using the lakeside gazebo. Consulting Planner Miller summarized comments received from the Hennepin County Transportation Department after the Planning Report was distributed to PC members. Hennepin County initially focused its comments regarding the sketch plan on the proposed street accesses in the Minnetrista portion of the development. In a phone conversation with Miller, Hennepin County clarified that further evaluation and discussion of the proposed private street in the Mound portion of the development will need to occur prior to or as part of the preliminary plat application. Hennepin County has recommended that the proposed location of Koehler Avenue be shifted eastward to meet the County's intersection spacing standards. In addition to the anticipated relocation of this street, any potential access spacing issues with existing streets /driveways to the east and north will need to be evaluated. Alternatively, Hennepin County recommends that the applicant consider replacing the proposed street access to CSAH 110 with a street that connects to the proposed Koehler Avenue. The property owner & resident of 6655 Halstead Avenue expressed his concerns about the private street access being denied by the County and additional traffic being routed to Halstead Avenue. The property owner & resident of 6655 Halstead Avenue questioned the applicant's claim that information packets were mailed out to neighbors of the proposed development. The applicant confirmed that information packets regarding the current sketch plan were mailed out to 35 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -327- neighborhood residents in lieu of a formal neighborhood meeting in November 2007, however, he did not have the mailing list with him to verify who was on the list. Community Development Director Smith clarified that a public hearing is not required for a Sketch Plan Review but a courtesy notice of the PC meeting was mailed out to neighboring residents of the proposed development. It is Staff's understanding that the City of Minnetrista has requested that a "new" neighborhood meeting be scheduled prior to the submittal of the preliminary plat. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax(612)338 -6838 -328- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2008 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #07 -30 SKETCH PLAN HALSTEAD POINTE XXXX BARTLETT BOULEVARD MARK ZWEBER The applicant is proposing a 36 unit housing development (9 units in Mound; 27 in Minnetrista) for the existing manufactured home park property on the south side of Bartlett Boulevard. Jeff Miller introduced the proposal and detailed some of." issues. The applicant (Mark Zweber and designer Rick Harfiori' ave a Power Point presentation. , Claywell asked for clarification on the do docks would be available for use by the Stevens was concerned about . It was thought that 2 transitory ssing the lake through one lot area. Paulsen asked if this ske p Neree ssed the view concerns from the neighbors to the east. Zweber said th are o buffers than previous proposals. The ponds are also view buffers. BJ Johnson (6655 Halstead Ave) He questioned the applicants statement that packets were sent out to the residents. He did not receive one. Notice of this meeting wasn't received until today. He's not happy with the lake access for 36 homes and is concerned with the numbers of people / kids at the lakeside gazebo. He also hopes Hennepin County will bend on moving the accesses onto Bartlett. Smith clarified mailing of information from City staff. Claywell asked if there would be a swimming beach. Zweber indicated that it was not determined at this time. Stevens asked about the price point. Zweber said they would market at $750,000 or less. Stevens asked about the Comp Plan desire to include "affordable" housing. Smith said that the Comp plan addressed a "wide range" of housing. The market generally dictates NW •4s1 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 2008 the price point of housing. This is private development; no public money is being sought. It would be difficult to require affordable housing. Mike Mueller commented about snow removal / storage. It's hard to see where they would put it. Smith shared some reminders: the lakeshore is private, not under the jurisdiction of the City; need to consider existing neighbor impacts — how to lessen; from old plan to new # of units, preservation of trees, etc. Michael felt Hennepin County needs to allow the east access. It is a great improvement over previous plans. Glister agreed with the improvement and views. Lakeside gazebo may be a problem. Claywell asked if making the lakeside lot a park would be good. Smith said the feedback from the residents is they want it quiet by the lake not a beach party. maintenance of another small park would be a proble A_ 4 va }s 1 -330- Also, PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©® TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Jeff Miller DATE: January 9, 2008 MEETING DATE: January 14, 2008 APPLICANT: Zweber, LLC REQUEST: Sketch Plan Review CASE NUMBERS: 07 -27 HKGi FILE NUMBER: 07 -05 LOCATION: 6625, 6627 and 6639 Bartlett Boulevard PROPERTY ID: 22- 117 -24 -43 -0008, 22- 117 -24 -43 -0009 and 22- 117 -24 -43 -0007 ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential APPLICATION SUMMARY At its January 14, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission will review the sketch plan for Halstead Pointe, a proposed 36 -unit housing development proposed for the existing manufactured home court property located on the south side of Bartlett Boulevard, in the southwest corner of Mound, and adjacent properties. The approx. 12.5 -acre site is both in Mound and Minnetrista, with approx. 3 acres located within Mound. The proposed development consists of 36 single- family detached "Bayhomes" and one (1) existing single - family detached house. Nine (9) of the proposed Bayhomes would be located in Mound with the remaining housing units located in Minnetrista. This sketch plan has changed significantly from the sketch plan that was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in May 2007. The number of overall housing units has been reduced from 43 to 36 units, twinhomes have been replaced by single - family detached `Bayhomes ", and the housing units are arranged using a coving concept that allows increased tree and open space preservation. PROCESS Whenever any subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 330.15, which includes three steps for a major subdivision. The submittal of a sketch plan is the first step in the major subdivision process and involves an informal review by Staff and the Planning Commission to outline various planning- related issues associated with a pending project and also identifies items that will need to be addressed in subsequent submittals. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -331- p. 2 #07 -11 Halstead Pointe Sketch Plan January 9, 2008 PROJECT ANALYSIS Details regarding this proposal are contained in the sketch plan application that was submitted on or around November 27, 2007. Since a larger portion of the proposed development lies within the City of Minnetrista, this sketch plan was first submitted and reviewed by the City of Minnestrista in advance of the City of Mound review. The sketch plan was reviewed by the Minnetrista Planning Commission on November 26, 2007, the Minnetrista Parks Commission on December 11, 2007, and the Minnetrista City Council on January 7, 2008. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan — The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this land for Low Density Residential, which allows single - family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. The sketch plan proposes nine (9) detached single - family housing units on 3.0 acres, which calculates to a density of 3.0 units per acre, so the sketch plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use guidance. Zoning — All of the properties are currently zoned R -1 (Single - Family Residential), which has the following minimum standards: • Minimum Lot Area 10,000 sq ft • Minimum Lot Width 60 ft • Minimum Lot Depth 80 ft • Minimum Front Yard Setback 30 ft • Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 ft • Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 ft The minimum lot area of 10,000 sq ft calculates to a density of 4.4 units per acre. The sketch plan proposes smaller condominium - platted lots that do not meet the minimum R -1 zoning standards in order to maximize preservation of the existing natural features and open space on this site. The proposed lots range from 34 -36 ft in width and from 86 -100 ft in depth. Lot sizes range from 2,924 — 3,600 square feet in area. There is typically ten (10) feet separation between houses with small portions of some houses that have seven (7) feet separation. During the last sketch plan review, the Planning Commission and City Council indicated they were willing to consider smaller lot sizes. PDA Concept Plan — The applicant is proposing a PDA Concept Plan for this neighborhood development. The owner or owners of any tract or tracts of land in the residential district may submit to the City Council for approval, a plan for the use and development of such a tract of land as PDA by making application for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) authorizing completion of the project according to the plan. The plan for the proposed project shall conform to the requirements of the use district within which the land is located. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -332- p. 3 #07 -11 Halstead Pointe Sketch Plan January 9, 2008 The number of dwelling units proposed for the entire site shall not exceed the total number permitted under the density control provision for the use district within which the land is located. In granting a CUP for a PDA, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Section 350.525 of the Zoning Ordinance contains specific standards and conditions relating to granting a CUP that shall be considered by the City Council and Planning Commission. The applicant's intent for requesting a PDA is to achieve the permitted development density on the site while preserving existing natural features and open spaces along Halstead Avenue. The proposed open spaces within the Mound portion of the site include a wooded bluffs area and a stormwater pond. The sketch plan proposes a density of 3.0 units per acre which does not exceed the R -1 zoning district's maximum density requirement of 4.4.units per acre. In general, Staff is comfortable with the Bayhomes concept, including reduced setbacks between the housing units. The proposed ten (10) ft separation between houses may be acceptable but further evaluation will be needed regarding the proposed seven (7) ft separations. The sketch plan proposes that the seven (7) lots above the bluff have- their - access from a private street that would connect to CSAH 110. Per City Code Section 330.95 Subd 11, private streets shall not be permitted nor shall public improvements be approved for any private street unless approved by the City Council as part of a conditional use permit for an overall development plan. The proposed private street ranges in width from 16 -20 ft. Staff is evaluating whether these narrow widths are acceptable, particularly the 16 ft width. The location of the private street's access to CSAH 110 must be further evaluated to identify any potential access spacing issues with existing streets /driveways to the east and north. The sketch plan proposes private shared open spaces, trails, and structures (two gazebos) in the Mound portion of the development. The trails are designed to provide walking and biking connections within the overall neighborhood, to the future trail along the south side of CSAH 110 and to the lakeshore. Although two (2) houses are proposed along the lakeshore, the entire lakeshore boundary of the property would be private shared open space. One (1) gazebo is proposed at the top of the bluff and one (1) gazebo is proposed along the lakeshore. The lakeshore open space area, gazebo and trail are located adjacent to an existing single - family lakeshore residential property on Halstead Avenue. Impact on the existing neighborhood on Halstead Lane due to the proposed trail /gazebo use(s) should be discussed. Subdivision - It is anticipated that the property will be platted as a Major Subdivision in both the City of Mound and Minnetrista with the process being done concurrently in each community. Additionally, the structure(s) will be replatted via M.S.S. 515 for condominiums. No annexation and /or detachment would be involved with the current proposal. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -333- p. 4 #07 -11 Halstead Pointe Sketch Plan January 9, 2008 Shoreland Management Overlay — The subject site is located within the Shoreland Area overlay district as it is located within 1,000 linear feet of Lake Minnetonka. Wetlands. - There are no known wetlands on the subject property. Park Land Dedication — Dedication of park land and/or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by the Subdivision Ordinance. The sketch plan application states no land is currently being proposed for park land dedication. Bluffs — In a previous sketch plan submittal for the subject property, topography indicated that a bluff may be present in the Mound portion of the site. However, this submittal does not include detailed topographical information; therefore, Staff is unable to determine if the previous information was accurate. In addition, Mound's Comprehensive Plan contains a Steep Slope Areas map that indicates the presence of steep slopes (greater than 18 %) on this site. A bluff is defined in the City's Zoning Ordinance as follows: "Bluff — Topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having all of thejcollorning characteristics: A. Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; B. The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody; C. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high water level averages 30 percent or greater; and D. The slope must drain toward the waterbody. Contour data will need to be provided at 2 -foot intervals for preliminary plat review in order for the City to make an accurate assessment of the bluff conditions. Public Street Improvements — Section 330.115 Subd 1 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots shall contain frontage on a publicly dedicated street. In addition, Section 330.130 Subd 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that the full width of the right -of -way of each street and alley dedicated in the plat shall be graded and improved. All streets and alleys shall have an adequate sub -base and shall be improved with an all - weather permanent surface. A concrete curb and gutter shall be installed on both sides of each street dedicated in the plat. The portion of Halstead Avenue within Mound currently does not meet these requirements. Private streets shall not be permitted nor shall public improvements be approved for any private street unless approved by the City Council as part of a CUP for an overall development plan. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -334- p. 5 #07 -11 Halstead Pointe Sketch Plan January 9, 2008 CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the sketch plan application and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Public Works Director Need to consider whether the sanitary sewer lift station has the capacity to accommodate the additional flows from the proposed development. The City may want to consider metering the Minnetrista flow so that it can be deducted or at least charged back for the number of units so we do not get charged on the Mound MCES bill. If the lift station needs to be rebuilt for the additional capacity then further discussion should take place. Parks Superintendent Fackler No comments. Police Chief Kurtz No comments. Hennepin Cty Transportation Dept nadequate The County has concerns relating t inadequate spacing between existing Koehler Street, which would remain in place in the sketch plan, and Cardinal Cove Drive. Some of the previous development proposals have done a better job at placing this street further away from Cardinal Cove Drive. If the cities believe this location of Koehler Street must be pursued, a feasible means of safely handling left and right turning traffic at these two (2) streets will need to be presented to the County prior to issuance of a permit. In addition to the close access spacing, the curvature of CSAH 110 also complicates any potential solution. There are additional comments regarding right -of -way dedication and future trail placement, which can be provided at the time of preliminary platting. DISCUSSION A. The sketch plan was reviewed by the Minnetrista Planning and Parks Commissions on November 26, 2007 and December 11, 2007 respectively. The Minnetrista City Council reviewed the sketch plan at its January 7, 2008 meeting. Staff requested a summary of the meeting from Minnetrista Planner Jason Angell who commented that overall the Minnetrista City Council felt the new plan was a tremendous improvement from previous 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -335- p. 6 #07 -11 Halstead Pointe Sketch Plan January 9, 2008 plans. The Council was also informed of Hennepin County's comments to push the main access (Halstead or Koehler Dr.) to the east and was understanding of the request. The Council was interested in tree removal and storm water but the developer was unable to provide answers as the calculations had not been done. When the discussion turned to density 2 Council members clearly stated that they were fine with the density shown but would not be granting a variance for impervious or tree removal (this would dictate if units had to be removed at a later date). The other 2 Council members were not willing to lock in on a number and told the developer that they would address the density once he was able to provide the details for trees and impervious surface as well as demonstrate the benefits of the PUD. A copy of the Minnetrista Planning Report has been included as an attachment. B. In November 2007, the applicant mailed out information regarding the current sketch plan to neighborhood residents in lieu of a formal neighborhood meeting. It is Staff's understanding that the City of Minnetrista has requested that a "new" neighborhood meeting be scheduled prior to the submittal of the preliminary plat. C. State statute includes specific regulations regarding the closing of manufactured housing _ courts. Members are advised that the City of Minnetrista and Mound City Council held a joint meeting last summer for the purpose of holding the public hearing required by state statute. PRELIMINARY STAFF COMMENTS • Any proposed development on Halstead Avenue will require adequate public right -of- way dedication and street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, pavement surfacing and inclusion of a turnaround. • More detailed topographical information will be needed as part of the preliminary plat submittal in order to assess the existence of bluffs and required setbacks from bluffs. • Proposed location of private neighborhood open space, gazebo and trail on lakeshore next to an existing lakeshore residence presents potential issues for nuisance issues for existing residential properties on Halstead Avenue and may not meet minimum lakeshore structure setback. Staff suggests that the applicant consider relocating this commons area away from existing residential properties, such as to a more central location within the new neighborhood or to the easternmost portion of the lakeshore area. • Members are advised that the owners /occupants of the adjacent Lakeshore residential property to the west of the lakeshore open space area (6641 Halstead Avenue) have submitted a letter to the City that outlines their concerns about locating the trail and gazebo adjacent to their property and recommends that the City deny this element of the sketch plan. See attached letter. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax(612)338 -6838 -336- P. i #07 -11 Halstead Pointe Sketch Plan January 9, 2008 • The location and narrow width (16 -20 ft) of the proposed private street will require further evaluation and discussion with the City's Public Works /Engineer, including any potential access spacing issues with existing streets /driveways to the east and north. • As part of the preliminary plat process, Staff requests that detailed survey data for the neighboring parcel to the east be provided so as to enable evaluation of the project's impacts upon this adjacent property. • The project's location within the shoreland and bluff impact zone requires additional analysis as part of or in advance of the preliminary plat process. • The need for sidewalk/trail improvements along the north edge of the property abutting CSAH 110/Bartlett Boulevard needs to be discussed with the applicant in cooperation with the City of Minnetrista and Hennepin County. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -337- 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 5364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Planning Commission Date City Council Date MAJOR SUBDI N APPLICATI ov MtV �. Case No. ' FEES MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION. CHECK BOX TYPE OF APPLICATION FEE Subject Address SKETCH PLAN REVIEW $200* EXISTING PRELIMINARY PLAT $350 +$15 per lot * SCRIPTION FINAL PLAT $350 +$15 per lot * The applicant is: _owner _other: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ PDA $350 * Address ESCROW DEPOSIT $5,000 VARIANCE $200 TOTAL $ * CALL THE MOUND PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO CONFIRM CURRENT FEES. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE. Major Subdivision Information (11/5/2007) Page 4 of 5 -338- �'"�-� 2-7 PROPERTY Subject Address INFO Name of Proposed Plat , d- Lot Block Subdivision EXISTING LEGAL PID# 5- `- A � ` Zone SCRIPTION APPLICANT The applicant is: _owner _other: Name(- �%cy? -- , L L- C- °��J' L►-6`,43+r.' Address - 'T �`l �^ d Worrkq Phone mleme � �L + J �— Gl� ` /93 L�ax NamL' R A i - -- r t e �� 4 Address "nl ^ & I' Z-7 b014, H' ` - OWNER (if other than applicant) Phone Home Work Fax Name Address ��J Z: �' � '" i'I .� ✓� k` SURVEYOR/ !G� T� " Fax Phone Home Work Major Subdivision Information (11/5/2007) Page 4 of 5 -338- Description of Proposed EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Number of Structures: Number of Dwelling Units /Structure: Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: sq. ft. Total Lot Area: sq. ft` _ Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. 1 certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided (including Section 330 of the Mound City Ordinance) and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. 11—s--o7 Print Applicant's Name pp icant's Signature Date Print Owner's Name Print Owner's Name Major Subdivision Information (11/512007) Page 5 of 5 Owner's Signature Owner's Signature -339- Date Date C)q,95 Description of Proposed Use: EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Number of Structures: Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: sq. ft. Number of Dwelling Units/Structure: Total Lot Area: sq. ft. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided (including Section 330 of the Mound City Ordinance) and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Print Applicant's Name C� /,/� 0 Print Owner's Name Print Owner's Name Major Subdivision Information (11/5/2007) Page 5 of 5 Applicant's Signature Owner's Signature Owner's Signature -340- Date / / -g -a"7 Date Date HALSTEAD POINT NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT A. Contact Information: Developer: Zweber, LLC Mark Zweber 952 469 -3650 Office P.O. Box 809 952 994 -1935 cell Lakeville, MN 55044 Property Owner: Cklair Hasse 6625 -6627 Bartlett Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Site Design Professional: Rick Harrison, President Rick Harrison Site Design Studio 8832 Seventh Ave. N. Minneapolis, MN 55427 General Information: City of Mound Address: 6625 -6627 Bartlett Blvd. PID Numbers: 22- 117 -24 -43 -0009 22- 117 -24 -43 -008 Number of Units Total Area of Site Area in Street ROW Net Area Impervious Surface: Total area of shared drives Total Area of Rooftops Total Impervious Surface Total area in Walks Open Space: Area of open space Area of usable open space -341- 9 2.8194 ac. .0067 ac. 2.8127 ac. .3314 ac. .3770 ac. .7084 ac. (25 % net site area) .1153 ac. 1.5616 ac. (55 %) .8614 ac. (55% of Open Space) November 13, 2007 RE: Halstead Pointe Neighborhood Development I am sending this packet of information to bring you current with what is happening with the referenced project. As a result of information and feed back received at the Preliminary Plat meeting before the Minnetrista City Council we decided to take a whole new look at the project. A new design team was hired to review all aspects. Enclosed please find a totally revised sketch plan drawing that has been submitted to both Cities of Minnetrista and Mound. This plan was determined to be changed enough by - -both Cities that they are requiring that it go through the entire process again starting with Sketch Plan review by the City of Minnetrista Planning Commission on November 26, 2007. You are invited to attend that meeting. You will also receive from the respective Cities the formal notices required when the process reaches Preliminary Plat. Also enclosed is a narrative entitled "Halstead Pointe Neighborhood Land Use Application Supplement" which was submitted in conjunction with the formal application to both Cities. This packet of information is being sent to you in lieu of a formal neighborhood meeting. The drawing is subject to the inevitable changes that happen as any project of this nature goes through the formal process. I would invite you to call me with any questions or comments you may have. S' cerely, AN����t ✓` Mark Zweber President (952) 469 -3650 Direct CC: Jason Angell, City of Minnetrista Sarah Smith, City of Mound Zweber, LLC P.O. Box 809, Lakeville, MN 55044 -342- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -343- iN 7 �rF `g� S',+ yl Rw �► zF' l w � OR Ile t V � • �� � < � �t_ Yom. V�f �� ���,i'�� 6vk • �,, pw VIEW• � � � : / r � � '� � � 4 � ti t, PI Fri i �S'� *�i! ����s"?� � �� �• • • • 11 M-1 ZA � t r e, h 1x � fa iayi p � � � j t�v J — �. .c Id e4l E to 4r' •.dz '';a e.� l !' ti F � � .c e4l E to 4r' •.dz '';a e.� l !' ti Kj fk yet � 9� � k ,.� � t t� $ � ., ,:- kS„,t5 kt��^tic ^f'��^'` �, z+Y9 i 4:.e�,�..% �, •— � V c.s� ry tit a 11.9 .4..+ �4 r f r C co fi r _ 76 F Wild La QWr AN 4F{ t�: rr r. ar d C .7 rrs ALL} Tr" 2 ct co to ' Ad a— L.L �.. lip .. y CLI, pf- {n:,, ,�. a 1 - s ®f �' A �,�_• t •fi r rm z 4 ! .,..... _ 1 qp tit di K i fv I .r` ! ;ISM s. kid dF C r3" n[ 1— ,,Jyy�y}. '�//��a9' � - p4y4�a' ' •� 'l�'i `� I ���.k �. L � � i� '. oil Q 1iJ' ��V*y •5 r '�,F'V+�f "' i -. �' -.,�"' �yr �_ w� I� —�i� T� � r•,Mw 1L.t 6 T ! it ±� � :. � 4r L� t ,• .•Wti rw•t 1 V 4i -346- 3 r - � i Tf r � � r O J O O -0 d •` }' f� � s O LA o OO -0 O O N E E a a 1h/3 L Q. .O N . Q Q L U >4-1 V V1 U v W W v v o o 0 N O O v v -0 - -C U U C C v 4- O O � s v Z 0 0 v v > 0 0 m O � Ln +-J 4— o 0 0' 4-J o a C Q cu N O O V) •> > O N O 0— Q u O s O O s � N L to O = s 0 cu � o a o 0 •v •v ca s v z v c o o ) E E X o 0- v o = v = Q fB O C 32 M CM 4-+ o m 4- cn U � ty U a.., OC- Ca v N 1�— E-- � F–• -347- .�� Q N E •- N a-+ -O O E O .+�-+ O O vi > o o > o O v s � � o o U +- Z3 _ a; U f� O s m U s E 'v- Ov s O O J O O N L U } }' f� � s s LA o L • aro N E E a a L a� Q. Q Q L U >4-1 V V1 U v W W v v o o 0 N O O v v -0 - -C U U C C v 4- O s v v 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 4-J 0 4-J 0 ro (3) 4--J V) cli E 0 -C w -EC! EL 72 m ai 0 02 wQ FD .5 r�r E E ID 7E i v 5 I :E -S E o. M M g E 'M 2 MW I've M CD .9 48 w m ai 0 02 r�r E E i v 5 I :E -S E o. M M g E 'M 2 mm c Le -0 I've 48 -349- l , f u � L 1, 4 RP Jill, �I• � ff A!fliii��Y�i t`yYf Y �t�f t'�4j � � ! ! b t �r y�.��¢�r ,f s� . In 8 c �y c. ZI f. �, a - ..+,F. ���. , • ��+ to F ofi� isf , w } S LI A f fit °1r � r -351- -352- 4 U^' W hL^,, W W L CB L 4-J L O v V) L 4- Q) C- +j O �O O p CLO cu W i OO 2 V M� W 1 U Ln Ln Ln O a--+ U U N v aA -352- �n C, N - Judson R o` J Rd � �- 6"� c. z N a. y d ro x xnN �S elun�itp� "�--' z � G�eny �P 3y East Blvd } .x �.• m �0 4 T d 6 a p.(i ul idW +° W 0 V 00 di paxw k v+ a West Blvd c:\1110 �pa Q' MN Pb I001P5 Z )a c MN l-) ;gp.IpR cc Col�srade 51 N%If -ry ', I.Nf Koglin kd Shady Ridge Rd Nw 0 -354- ,q S7' N v v ry V ti r .M1 ..Nj jsSO ° N �'td a �u a> 5 13/ � � y a lefiersosa S" ttirK T � m aN IS te[T 4 a� vJ V-7, i {i �thvle%v T Tlpk tiabSa11 St' Me m � M�LR St � a, ;jl N Franklyn 5t. Nw x co pa �1 i1 Glen St Nw MN t5 saiuef Grove St 5N� o rt i Lynn Rd S n ` 7 ',� ZLiitid St N Rd � �- 6"� c. z N a. y d ro x xnN �S elun�itp� "�--' z � G�eny �P 3y East Blvd } .x �.• m �0 4 T d 6 a p.(i ul idW +° W 0 V 00 di paxw k v+ a West Blvd c:\1110 �pa Q' MN Pb I001P5 Z )a c MN l-) ;gp.IpR cc Col�srade 51 N%If -ry ', I.Nf Koglin kd Shady Ridge Rd Nw 0 -354- ,q S7' N v v ry V t 4`y y y � � y ttirK T � V-7, i {i �thvle%v T Tlpk co -354- ,q S7' N v v ry V r -355- Q,J O a U O •� a_ O co •� N o 0-0 •� ca a •m C6 -- -0 O -1 a CO a L a N m v 'v L O � a — - °' a. O a ca ^ L a' o w a E a o "_ > c c -0 +-j ao c a a� -a W -r + J � a S m �' 0 a a 4-j � 'L ,l i O O 0- N -o E .,., a s 'N o a '� o °a' L ca U •U 3 a 4_ N Q L a +-+ L Q 4-+ +1 ?� a C , � M CU � N a CU E L CU � U •Q o }' •? L -0 CU Q v CL L ., a O v CU ,N a v 0 a („ O a -r- _ f6 > I— a -a E 0 c O -O -(03) CD •Q (6 a O u C t� CU v E a o E Ln l 0 (n L- c Q_ a 0 a - E - "- a 0 a > Q ca a •(n L M u O U C c� } ' O M M a ,N (n a +5 N ca �G �- O L p � v �` ' a a E p +' O c- c6 a O Q MO (n a S2 4-, � -C-+ =3 Q. a � c V L • -c E a L Q -C- a '-' �-' — 4-J 4- U -355- -356- .1 r7i . � \ . � � g- � �k � -- � :- �� � � � ƒ S s F r J I Ley �- r F wk MAT KIS:dik TAF.�? ice" F {YY� rill � s M M , 11 r lxk //�� [#II■ YYY N j � � A 10 fir y n H Of T 1 -360- ur � l��t ti 4-J CL 4- 0 -0 1+- O > 0 0 W (Ij 0 (Ij V) -C +j -0 N -0 Tj GJ u .4-J -C 0 0 (3) 4-J U Q) 4-J 4-J Qj +-J 4- 4-1 u co 0 Ln aj C E 0 0 m 0 u u u ai oz C: -1-i CL o CU C- Q) > > 4-J Ln (IJ tw U aj up cu .— 0 -0 -I-- u MD UJ 4-J V) L- uj C Ln 0 4-1 0 E E aj a GJ 0 o o E o w -0 0 > Q) L- CL co -0 W u W Ln -C T, 14-- v cz CL 0 0 Ln -360- ur � l��t ti ko t������9g�F1��lidtl�ii 'Ir 4(i {p S I EI PN a1 A At TIA I Ais���f � d � �'y�r ,F �• � l e j i'± j`�$f FrIN °7i ? c � yr� � L rm .k / -- tr y t r f I i:f u ,l t 1, n ✓i 6 y., IV F r. t r u? Nr y, j� -363- �Jv 4-1 ca L) -7 4-1 0 -AW I 1�0 OL7' M -C Q) C- 0 4- 4-J 4-J n tao —364— *p x- .TL ce re ddar CL AMM ul (3) cu 4- 0 amm� Qj E E -0 CL 4-1 0 u m > E cu wu LE 4-J 4-1 E V) cu U 0 E Lo— - " .> 0 N C %(U cu Co u 0 4+-- cu —364— *p x- .TL ce re ddar . All on i F t �r � 1 7dth,5t _ rr *- - �,2Cth_St ��,y, f ;'�.r ��• _ s��-: �1 M; �6 yr.. -� "'•J � �_..".,.® � � �k�.. .: Seri l? . ��,�1 � � . i "� ' i N J -L ! ,J qF7� tl Terry and Rita Hughes 6641 Halstead Avenue Mound, MN 55364 December 20, 2007 pEC2�a� To: Minnetrista Planning Commission and City Council Re: Proposed development of Halstead Point We have been very happy with our decision over 20 years'ago to move to Halstead Bay on Lake Minnetonka. We chose this home to finish raising our son in a quiet, secluded neighborhood. We moved from Plymouth and were tentative about the move and looked at many homes in the Lake Minnetonka area. We were impressed by the home on Halstead, because of the small neighborhood tucked away in an unspoiled area. We also liked the fact that Halstead Bay is the western most bay on the lake and would provide less boat traffic for a more private home setting. Upon retirement we have wintered in Arizona and return to our home in April on Halstead Avenue to enjoy the lake and the laid back lifestyle. When you meet on the matter of the proposed development of Halstead Point, we will be in Arizona. We understand that over 30 homes will be built in the Halstead Point proposal. We take issue with the addition of the walking path and gazebo adjacent to our lot. We also question the precedence set by allowing a small parcel of land with a gazebo and a path to the lake for residents who do not reside on the lakeshore. Many of the development residents will use the gazebo with potential of additional guests creating an undesirable environment for the Lakeshore residents. Often when a group of people get together at a meeting place there is a potential for loud behavior, drinking, music and lack of good judgment. We are very concerned about the gazebo and walking path creating many issues including the safety of our neighborhood and the overall quality of living. The walking path and gazebo will establish a continuous flow of people, congestion, noise and disruption to an established quiet and peaceful neighborhood. We are aware that the walking path and gazebo would increase the profit and selling point for the developer, but it is ultimately the current residents who will pay the price. We worry about having privacy on our deck as well as inside of our house. We have nine young grandchildren and don't want to have to worry about indecent language and behavior in the gazebo. With the 36 homes and at the very minimum of two people per house there would be 72 people that could walk the path and wander the shoreline. We also worry about possible littering that will pollute the grounds and water of Lake Minnetonka. A reasonable and fair solution would be for the developer to sell home sites without water access as well as the common gathering place for the residents and their guests. Your understanding and willingness to deny water access and a gazebo in the new development would allow the neighborhood to stay intact as much as it possibly could with an addition of 36 home sites. Thank- you for your ' e and nsideration, r -366- r Sarah Smith Fror`"� Jason Angell gangeli @ci.minnetrista.mn.us] - f`� Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8 :00 AM To: SarahSmith @cityofmound.com Subject: FW: Halstead Pointe Neighborhood - Concept Plan Jason Angell City Planner City of Minnetrista P: (952) 446 -1660 F: (952) 446 -1311 jangell @ci.minnetrista.mn.us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Robert.Byers @co.hennepin.mn.us [ mailto: Robert.Byers @co.hennepin.mn.us] Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 11:00 AM To: sarahsmith @cityofmound.com; Jason Angell Cc: Tom.Johnson @co.hennepin.mn.us Subject: Halstead Pointe Neighborhood - Concept Plan . Sarah & Jason: • We have reviewed the latest Concept Plan for the Halstead Pointe Neighborhood (11/13/-&7-). - Unfortunately, from the perspective of CSAH -110 we find the layout unacceptable due to the extremely poor access spacing that would result. From the beginning of our discussions over the last couple of years, we have had concerns relating to the spacing of the development street with Cardinal Cove Drive. Some of the previous development proposals have done a better job at placing the development street further away. We understand some of the considerations and constraints that have guided the street to its current placement. However, if the cities believe this location must be pursued - before we issue a permit, a feasible means of safely handling left and right turning traffic at these two streets will need to be presented to us. Besides the close access spacing, the curvature of CSAH -110 also complicates any potential solution. There are other comments regarding right -of -way dedication and future trail placement, and these can be provided at the time of preliminary platting. Any questions just call either myself or Dave Zetterstrom (612- 596- 0355). IMMIS Bob Byers, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer �^ Hennepin County Transportation Department Transportation Planning Division 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 -5421 612 - 596 -0354 (Direct dial) 1 -367- City of Minnetrista Planning Department Sketch Plan Review To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Jason Angell, City Planner Meeting Date: 12 -07 -2008 Plat Name: Halstead Pointe Neighborhood File #: 2007 -60 Introductory Information Request: p &J Investments, LLC has submitted an application for a Sketch Plan — Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the site currently occupied by the manufactured housing park and the adjacent properties on County Road 1IOW. The proposed subdivision would result in a subdivision of 28 units consisting of 1 existing single family home and 27 new "Bayhomes ". The property is currently zoned R -3: Medium density single- family residence however, the applicant is proposing this subdivision as a PUD to gain the necessary "flexibilities" from the zoning code. Comprehensive Plan Background During the recent Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the City agreed that a minimum of 21 units would be constructed on this property. The City has an obligation to achieve the minimum number of units to uphold the agreement with the Metropolitan Council (MET Council). Review IN GENERAL: Site Character: The proposed development is divided by the municipal boundary shared with the City of Mound. The majority of the proposed development lies within the City of Minnetrista (approximately 75 %) with the remainder in the City of Mound. This site has rolling topography and is heavily wooded throughout. Preservation of trees will be a significant challenge for any development of this property. A small portion of the site (located in the City of Mound) is adjacent to Lake Minnetonka, however Lake Minnetonka is visible from a significant portion of the site. Pre Application Activities: The proposal currently before the city is a sketch plan. The purpose of this step is two fold. First it allows City staff, the Commissions, the Council, and the public to become familiar with a formal development proposal that may come before the City in the future (via a preliminary plat request). Second, it allows the Applicant to gain a sense of what issues they must address if they choose to seek a preliminary plat approval. Stretch Plan Review. 110[Wead Pointe ;Aei,1,fzbuf-hoi d Cih (01Mei! Report: 1- 0' -200N Filc 200 -(i(1 Page 2 (cont) The recommendations and findings made during a concept plan review are in no way binding the City to subsequent action(s). PUD Intent: Application for sketch plan review is the required first step in the PUD creation process. The purpose of the review is to allow the Park and Planning Commissions, as well as the City Council, an opportunity to guide the Applicant as to what is generally expected by the city, and to alert an Applicant to potential problems with the proposal. This feedback can then be used by an Applicant to make an informed decision on whether to proceed with a formal preliminary plat application. As part of the preliminary plat the Applicant will be required to provide a written narrative providing information on the proposal, and explaining how the plan will meet the purpose and intent of the PUD regulations outlined in Section 505.31. One of the biggest things the Applicant will need to demonstrate is that the proposed development provides additional benefits to the City which exceed conventional standards to offset the effect of requested development variations. Density: As stated above, the City has an obligation to achieve a minimum of 21 units on this property to meet the agreement they have structured with the MET Council. The zoned density -for the R3 district is 2.5 < 3.5 units per acre. The PUD does allow for a 25% "bonus" to the density requirements. The plans state the net area of the development within Minnetrista is 8.361 acres. Using this number the density range for this site would be: 8.361 x 2.5 = 20.9 or 21 units (minimum by zoning and MET Council agreed upon) 8.361 x 3.5 = 29.26 or 29 units (maximum by zoning) 29.26 x 125% = 36.57 or 37 units (maximum with PUD bonus) The biggest question the Applicant would like answered as part of the sketch plan review is the number of units. The City Council should state if they are o.k. with the number of units presented or if the units should be reduced to a number NOT less then 21. Doing this will allow the Applicant the ability to evaluate the project and if or how it will move forward. Lot Configuration & Setbacks: Specifications and standards for lots shall be at the discretion of the City Council, and shall encourage a desirable living environment which assists in achieving the goals set out for PUD's. 0:'.Plannin�-, `Uand i Jsel -and Divisions'lialstead Pointe: 6701 CR 1 10\V'2007 31-d Sketch Plan'(-(' rel)ort 1.7.08.doc -369- Sketch Plan Review: Halstead Pointe :'Veighhorhoo(l Cif >> Couneil Report: 1 -07 -2005 File 200'-60 Page 3 (cont) The sketch plan submitted does not provide enough information for staff to provide comment. However, it is staffs understanding that the proposed `Bayhomes" would have a separation of 10 feet between units at their closest point. At the time of preliminary plat the plans shall clearly identify lot size, width, setbacks, etc. Possible Variances: As demonstrated with previous applications, any development of this site will require significant removal of trees. If the Applicant is unable to meet the reforestation guidelines of the City's tree preservation and reforestation ordinance, a variance may be required at the time of preliminary plat. NOTE: The City Council is currently reviewing a proposed amendment to the tree preservation ordinance. Staff anticipates the adoption of this ordinance taking place shortly after the first of the year. Comments Received. A number of issues were raised during the review process of the previous plan. The concerns raised included: • Density ■ Stormwater Tree Preservation ■ Landscaping ■ Clubhouse location ■ Screening and visibility ■ Road configuration(s) ■ Architecture ■ Access to County Road I IOW The attached narrative, provided by the Applicant, explains how this plan addresses the previous concerns raised by neighboring residence. An email received from Mr. David Fasching is attached for your review and consideration. Engineering Comments: Streets/Trails: The Applicant is proposing to upgrade the existing Kohler Avenue from County Road i IOW to Halstead Avenue. The north/south street would include a center island with median landscaping at the iq rsection with County Road 1 IOW. The new Kohler Avenue is shown to include 8 0 feet of right -of -way along the north end and 60 feet of right -of -way on the south end. Private roads are proposed. A shared private driveway is shown to be constructed along the east end of the east cul -de -sac of Halstead Drive. The shared driveway will serve two BayHome units. 0:\Planning'\,Land Use \Land Divi si ons\Hal stead Pointe; 6701 CR 1 IOW \2007 3rd Sketch Plan \CC report 1.7.08.doc -370- Sketch Plan Reri<ir: Halstead Pointe Xeighborhood Page 4 City Council Report: 1 -07 -2008 File 2007 -60 (cont-) The concept plan includes a proposed trail along County Road I I Ow and a private trail system that connects the `Bayhome" units with the trail along the south side of County Road 110W. Access will need to be provided to the residents of Halstead Drive during construction. Perhaps the existing driveway that is located along the east edge of the site that serves the existing homes could be utilized as the temporary access. Otherwise, there will need to be a construction staging plan prepared to allow the existing residents to have ingress and egress during the construction of this subdivision. The following comments apply to the streets, trails, and sidewalks. 1. The concept plan shows improving the Kohler Avenue street connection with County .Road I I OW. Also, a private street connection is shown in the northeast comer of the site to connect to County Road 1 IOW. Hennepin County should be contacted and a written response from the County should be received that outlines the right -of -way requirements, access recommendations, and turn lane requirements for County Road I IOW. Preliminary indications are that they would like to see Kohler Drive curve slightly and a left turn lane added. 2. The concept-plan-does show a trail along County Road 1 I OW. The developer should provide adequate right -of -way for an 8- foot -wide trail separated from the street with an 8 -foot boulevard. The trail design should accommodate the future street width of County Road I I OW based on Hennepin County's design standards. 3. The proposed new public street (Kohler Street) can be constructed to a 28 -foot- wide bituminous street section with concrete curbs. The portion of Kohler Avenue with the center median should include a 20- foot -wide street section on each side of the island. 4. The private street layout on the west side of the site should be revised to have its access from Kohler Street rather than Cardinal Cove Drive to minimize the traffic on Cardinal Cove Drive accessing County Road 1 l OW. S. The new private streets will need to be constructed to City standards (i.e. 9 -ton design). The private streets should include concrete curb and gutter and catch basins to collect the storm water runoff. The street width shall be at least 20 feet wide from the face of curb to face of curb. 6. Street access for the existing home will be provided from existing Halstead Avenue. Halstead Avenue is currently deficient in meeting City standards and it should be upgraded by a bituminous overlay. Cul -de -sacs shall be constructed at both ends to enable fire trucks, maintenance vehicles, garbage trucks, etc. to turn around. t� 0: ",Planning \Land Use \Land Divisions \Halstead Pointe; 6701 CR 1 lOWy2007 3rd Sketch Plan \CC report 1.7.08.doc -371- Sketch Plan Review: Halstead Pointe Neighborhood City Council Report: I -07 -2008 File 2007 -60 (cont) Page 5 7. Additional right -of -way should be provided as part of this plat for Halstead Avenue along the southern boundary of the plat. Current right -of -way is only 30 feet wide. An additional 10 feet of right -of -way would be recommended from this plat to work towards bringing it up to the 50 -foot right -of -way desired. Also, additional right -of -way for a turnaround at each end of the street (cul -de -sac bulb, hammerhead "T" turnaround, or some other type) should be provided, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 8. Existing Cardinal Cove Drive only has curb and gutter on the west side of the street. The development should be responsible for completing the construction of the concrete curb and gutter and bituminous street widening on the east edge of Cardinal Cove Drive. 9. Ten feet of additional right- of-way should be dedicated along the east edge of Cardinal Cove Drive as part of this plat to bring the right -of -way up to the City standard of 60 feet wide. 10. The plans should also show the construction of a 5- foot -wide concrete walk with an 8- foot -wide boulevard along the east edge of Cardinal Cove Drive to tie into the new trail along County Road I IOW. 11. An existing driveway is located on the southwest corner of the site. The Applicant should dedicate a driveway easement for the neighbor's driveway, or work with the neighbor to relocate the driveway to keep it on his or her property. 12. All streets should be constructed to 9 -ton design. Hennepin County: Hennepin County has reviewed the proposed sketch plan and finds the layout unacceptable due to the extremely poor access spacing that would result on County Road 1 l OW. These concerns are related to the spacing between the development street (Koehler Drive) and Cardinal Cove Drive. If the cities believe the proposed location must be pursued, a feasible means of safely handling left and right turning traffic at these two streets will need to be presented to the county for their review and approval. Storm Water Management/ Grading Plans: The concept plan drawings show five storm water ponds to handle the storm water management from this site and the off -site areas that drain through the site. The concept plan shows that the site will provide 0.8 acres of ponding for controlling storm water runoff. O:APlannine \Land UseALand Divisions\Halstead Pointe; 6701 CR I I OW \2007 3rd Sketch Plan \CC report 1.7.08.doc -372- Sketch Mai? Revicw Halstead Pointe A ci -171, orhood ('itt' Cntenci! Ile��or °t: 1- 0 "- ?�llA' Page 6 (cont.) 1. The preliminary plat submittal should include an overall storm water management plan to address water quality and water quantity management on- site. This plan should include existing runoff rates from the site and all tributary drainage areas; proposed runoff rates including ponding and BMP's to maintain pre - development discharge rates; and storm sewer pipe sizes and culvert designs, including flow calculations for the 10 -year and 100 -year events. 2. The concept plans do not identify an outlet for the storm water runoff. Detailed storm water calculations should be provided as part of the preliminary plat application. 3. The site appears to be well suited to incorporate Low Impact Development/Sustainability Best Management Practices. To the extent practicable, incorporate LID features into the site design. This may include shared driveways, minimized grading, preservation of existing vegetation, vegetated swales, bio- retention cells, filter strips, rain gardens, pervious pavements, and other measures to increase infiltration and reduce runoff volumes. 4. The grading plan submitted with the preliminary plat application shall show the house type, proposed lowest €loor elevation, and proposed garage floor elevation for the proposed houses. The lowest floor elevation shall be shown at least 3 feet above the 100 -year high water level for the adjacent ponds, rain gardens, and wetlands. 5. Appropriate permit(s) will need to be obtained from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District before any construction can begin. 6. The rate control and water quality criteria for the site should meet the City's requirements and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules for the development. 7. The ponds shall include a 10:1 safety bench for the first foot below the normal water level. 8. The preliminary plat application will need to show more information about the off -site storm sewer lines. The new development will need to provide an adequate outlet for the storm water runoff that does not adversely affect the adjacent properties. Sanitary Sewer And Water Main: 1. The sanitary sewer lines for this development will connect to an existing 9 -inch sanitary sewer line in Halstead Avenue. The existing 9 -inch sanitary sewer line 0:1P1anniit 'Land Use'Land DivisionslHalstead Pointe, 6701 CR 1 10W12007 3rd Sketch Plan�CC' report 1.7.08.doc -373- Sketch Plan Renieir: Halstead Pointe ;Veighborhood Cite Council Report: 1 -07 -2008 File 2007 -60 Page 7 (cont) drains to a lift station on Halstead Avenue. The connection to the existing 9- inch sanitary sewer line in Halstead Avenue will require an outside drop to be built at the existing manhole. The existing manhole is 22 feet deep. The existing street surfacing on Halstead. Avenue will need to be removed and replaced at the sanitary sewer connection. 2. An 8 -inch sanitary sewer line should be provided in Kohler Avenue to the south right -of -way line of County Road 110W to serve the undeveloped property to the north. 3. A water service to the existing single - family house located in the southwest corner of the site will need to be provided. 4. All proposed water mains should be looped. Shoreland Overlay District. 1. The entire site is within the Shoreland Overlay District for Lake Minnetonka. Either demarcate the Shoreland Overlay District on the drawing or call out the same. 2. PUDs within the Shoreland District must maintain fifty percent of the overall site acreage as open space of which at least half must be useable as defined by Minnetrista City Code. Trees: 1. The applicant shall submit a tree preservation plan indicating the significant trees in the development. The tree preservation plan shall identify which trees will be removed. 2. Tree replacement shall be required if more than 30% of the trees are removed by the grading, street, utility, ponding /rain gardens, and house construction. It does appear that the site will exceed the allowed 30% removal. 3. Limits of tree removal shall be clearly demarcated on the plan set. Fencing shall be placed at the drip line of those wooded areas to be preserved. 4. When possible, existing tree cover should be maintained to increase rainfall abstraction and to minimize runoff. 5. A landscaping plan should be submitted to show the location of any proposed new trees and other landscaping features to offset the tree loss. Parking Fpcilities: City Code requires two parking spaces for each single - family dwelling (one of which O:`•.Plannina \Land tlse \Land Divisions \Halstead Pointe; 6701 CR I IOW`,2007 3rd Sketch Plan \CC report I.7.08.doc -374- { Sketch Plan Rer C'11 . ffalstMd Pointe .A'ei,�1hbor1roocl tr C nrnrcN k� /�or7: 1 D7 -?0O, I' e 200--00 Page 8 (cont) must be a garage space). Staff does not anticipate any problems in achieving this requirement however, the Applicant is encouraged to provide additional off street "guest" parking within the development. ENVIRONMENTAL & OTHER NEIGHBORHOOD IWACTS: Flood Plain & Steep Slopes: Steep slopes are located along the east side of the property. The proposed development is designed to work with the existing grades and limit the amount of disturbance to the slope areas. During the review of previous applications, it was determined that the slopes were created by the construction of County Road 1 IOW. Seeing that these slopes were "man made ", it was determined that they do not meet the intent of the steep slope/bluff ordinance. Required Plantings & Screening: "One (1) tree shall be planted for every forty (40) feet of frontage along each road unless the city council, upon recommendation of the city engineer, shall grant a waiver." Spacing of the trees shall be generally 40 feet apart, but can/will vary depending upon the location of existing trees, natural features, view triangles for roads, etc. The plan should take these into consideration with proposed tree placement. Areas along the proposed and existing roads with heavy tree growth are exempt from this tree requirement (as approved by the City Engineer). As proposed, this exemption will likely apply throughout this development provided trees are protected or replanted in boulevard areas after grading has occurred. Street trees should be depicted on page "C" of the required tree preservation plan, and will not count towards the required preservation or protection. The Applicant should provide plans on all boulevard plantings and screening plantings for review. Open Space: Shoreland District PUD's must maintain 50% of the overall site acreage as open space. A minimum of one -half of the open space required (25 %) must be useable. The entire subdivision lies within the Shoreland District. Therefore, the shoreland standards are applied above and beyond the PUD standards. The current plan indicates that there is 57 %0 open space, of which 52% is useable, within the subdivision. As part of the preliminary plat submittal, the Applicant shall 0: Planning Land Use`land Divisions'. Halstead Pointe; 670 CR i l( }W 2007 1'rd Sketch Plan'CC report I.7.0n.doc -375- >'kefHh Philr Rerh m: Hu/sleud Pointe Wighborhood 'in (`onncil Report, 1- 0 - -200S T i1c 00- -60 Page 9 (cont) provide additional information and detail identifying the areas calculated in the open space requirements. Impervious Surface: In the R -3 zoning district, 25% of the lot may be occupied by a building while 35% may be covered by impervious surfaces. The Shoreland District standards state that no lot may have more than 25% impervious surfaces. The current plan proposes 25% impervious surface area. It appears the plan would meet the requirements outlined by city code, but at the time of preliminary plat the Applicant shall provide additional information and detail identifying the areas calculated and materials used. CHARGES & FEES: In General: As always, the Applicant is responsible for all fees related to the review of this application (including but not limited to engineering, wetland, legal, environmental consultants, or other such experts as required by this application). Applicants may be able to limit their City expenses by utilizing their own private services. Park Dedication: Based on the proposed density of the subdivision, current code calls for a 12% park dedication. The required park dedication is to be based on 8.361 net acres which is the net acreage minus the area for the existing single family lot. City Code allows the city to accept 12% of the land or the cash -in -lieu equivalent to the fair market value to satisfy the park dedication. The dedication in land would be one acre. Fair market value as determined by the City Council, is based upon a current appraisal submitted to the City by the Applicant at the time of preliminary plat. The appraisal shall be made by an appraiser who is a member of SREA or MAI, or an equivalent real estate society. Warning Siren System: The Applicant must contribute a warning siren to serve the area, or paying a cash -in- lieu fee. The City's standard fee in lieu of providing an on site siren is $64 * the potential number of new lots for this zoning district (28 potential lots — 1 existing homestead = 27 lots x $64 = $1,728). Sewer Area Charge: As this subdivision will access municipal sewer services, there will be a sewer area charge assessed. For lots in urban areas, the sewer area charge is $1100 per acre of land above the Ordinary High Water Mark (OH W). This charge is required for the upkeep and 0: Plannim -, Land Ilse Land Divisions'�Halste.ad Pointe;. 6701 CR I IW2007 3rd Sketch Plan CC report 1.7.08.doc -376- Skeic17 Plan Rcrrle11'. H0114eahl Poinxe \(J- 17110rhoorl OtYC'ouncvl Relrort. 1 -0�- 008 ile 100 - -60 i Page 10 (cont) maintenance of the larger local sewer system to which the development will be connected. Water Area Charge: Conclusion Planning Com. Rea: Assuming all 8.361 acres being developed are above the OHW, the resulting City sewer area charge will be $9,197.10. As this subdivision will access municipal water services, there will be a water area charge assessed. For lots in urban areas, the water area charge is $8000 per acre of land above the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHW). This charge is required for the upkeep and maintenance of the larger local water system to which the development will be connected. Assuming all 8.361 acres being developed are above the OHW, the resulting City sewer area charge will be $66,888. The City Council must examine the proposed sketch plan and inform the applicant of the proposal's merit, needed changes, and suggested conditions. If major changes are required, the council may advise the applicant to return Frith a different/revised plan. Keep in mind that additional changes can be required as a result of further study during the preliminary plan phase. The Planning Commission did review the sketch plan during their November 261h meeting. The commission felt this plan was a tremendous improvement from the previous plan and applauded the applicant in designing a plan that preserves so much open space, works with the natural topography of the site, and limits the amount of tree loss. in discussing the density of the project, the Planning Commission did not see the need to reduce the number of units unless it was later determined that impervious surface requirements could not be met. Overall the Planning Commission feels that the plan presented works and that the applicant should be allowed to proceed to preliminary plat. Parks Com. Rea: The Parks Commission discussed the sketch plan during their December 11`" meeting and is recommending the City collect cash -in -lieu of land to satisfy the park dedication required for this development. It was noted that the applicant is to work with staff and Hennepin County on the proposed location of the trail along County Road I l OW. If it is determined that a separate easement is necessary for the trail, the Park Commission stated they would consider giving credit towards the required park dedication for the easement. 0: Plannin( -:Land 1.1se'.Land Di visions',,Halstead Pointe; 6701 CR i 10\\ 2007 Ord Sketch Plan '( ='(- cepolt 1.7.08.doc -377- Sketch Plan Revieir: Halstead Pointe Neighborhood Page I I Cite Council Reporl: 1-07-2008 File 2007 -60 Final Staff Guidance: Staff would recommend the council direct the applicant to continue working with staff on any changes/corrections and allow the applicant to continue forward with the submittal of preliminary plat. Attachments: 1. Applicant's narrative 2. Proposed sketch plan 3. Fasching comments Cc: Mark Zweber, Main Contact Greg Korstad, Applicant's attorney Rick Harrison, Site designer Kevin Teppen, Applicant's engineer O:APlanningTand Use'Tand Divisions \Halstead Pointe: 6701 CR I I OW \2007 3rd Sketch PlanACC report 1.7.08.doc -378- � r �---, HALSTEAD POINTE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT This supplement to the City of Minnetrista land use application for Halstead Pointe Neighborhood provides supplemental information in support of the application. A. Contact Information: Developer: Name: Mark R. Zweber, Zweber LLC Address: P. 0. Box 809 Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone No.: (952) 469 -3650 Property Owners: Name: L & D Reinhart Address Telephone Name Address Telephone Name Address P & 3 Investments, LLC 300 Dearborn Court Minneapolis MN 55343 (952) 451 -3836 Scott Burg Telephone Site Design Professional: Name: Rick Harrison, President Rick Harrison Site Design Studio Address: 8832 Seventh Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55427 Phone: (763) 595 -0055 -379- C. La E. Project Engineer. Name: Kevin Teppen Schoell Madsen Address: 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 Phone: (763) 746 -1600 Site Data: Address: 6701 County Road 110 West Current Zoning: R -3 Medium density Residential 2.5 — 3.5 units per acre Parcel Size: 13.1224 acres total; 10.3030 in Minnetrista; 2.8194 in Mound Property ID Nos.: 22 -117 -24-43 -0009; 22 -117- 24-42- 0008;22- 117 -24-43 -0007; 22- 117 -24 -43- 0004;22 -24 -43- 0003;22 -117 -24-43 -0002; 22 -117- 24-43 -0042 Legal Description See Attached General Information: Proposed Subdivision Name: Halstead Pointe Neighborhood Number of Lots Proposed: 28 (includes one existing single family home) Acreage Dedicated for Open Space None _ Acreage of Dedicated Rights of Way 1.5906 acres Current Land Characteristics: This property is currently occupied as a trailer park. It is situated on the border of Mound and Minnetrista and is heavily wooded. The trees are a mix of species and sizes reflecting the lack of active forestry management. The site includes a slope that separates the northeasterly segment of the property from the south and southwesterly portions of the property. Only a small portion of the site (located in the City of Mound) is adjacent to Lake Minnetonka, however Lake Minnetonka is visible from a significant portion of the site. Stormwater on the property and upstream is not actively managed or controlled as it flows to the lake. Project Intent and Vision: The intent of this project is to provide life -style housing in a common interest community setting by creating a pedestrian oriented neighborhood with walkways along natural and landscaped corridors. The proposed development is configured to take advantage of views of the lake and to preserve existing open space, slopes and wooded areas as a neighborhood amenity by meeting the market need for higher density housing. The market target is expected to be "empty nesters" however no formal restriction is expected to be placed on ownership. Utilizing a Bayhome product is important to this development to take advantage of lake views and to encourage interaction among residents via the walling connections. 2. :1 F. Density: The proposed density of the project is 28 units on the 10.3030 acre portion of the site in Minnetrista. As a conforming detached single family development with 14000 square foot lots, in a R-3 zone the site would accommodate 24 units in the City. The proposed development calls for 4 additional units. As this development is proposed as a PUD, this is within the 25% density bonus calculation (allowing up to 30 units if PUD conditions are met). This is with the allowable density for the R -3 District. G. Neighborhood Issues: The site has been the subject of previous development proposals for townhome or condominium projects. The recent Halstead Point townhome and twin home development received comments from the neighborhood raising several issues including the following: i. Stormwater Management: The current lack of stormwater management resulting in run -on to properties on Halstead Avenue can and will be able to be mitigated by the development of this site. ii. Tree Preservation: The wooded nature of the site was to be sacrificed to reconfigure the site for the prior development proposals. The current proposal preserves significantly more of the trees by reconfiguring the homes trails and driveways to avoid major site excavation. Much of this is also due to the clustering of the housing—and reduction of public street. iii. Landscaping. The potential to change the character of the area by removal of trees and regrading is now avoided. iv. Clubhouse; Concerns about whether clubhouse use would interfere with the neighbors are eliminated by removal of a clubhouse from the plan. The gazebo gathering areas will be limited in use by proximity to homes. With the old plan the clubhouse was the neighborhood focus — the current plan offers the entire site as the neighborhood focus. V. Screening and visibility. The neighbors on Halstead Avenue sought to screen the bulk of the twin homes and the rear faces of homes from view. This issue is mitigated by the configuration of Bayhomes in lieu of twinhomes and by placing the finished living areas facing Halstead Avenue. Preservation of the current trees and construction of the water feature will present an attractive aesthetic natural environment adjacent to much of Halstead Avenue. vi. Road Configuration: Previous proposals had the access to Halstead Avenue properties directed on an indirect route through the new development. Existing residents would have had at least double the distance to reach 110 and would have encountered another intersection or two. The new proposal eliminates the inconvenience of the previous proposal. The Current proposal would not change traffic patterns, except to close the current access to the existing trailer court. The current proposal keeps Koehler 3. -381- Street intact, however the proposal calls for improving the entrance with median landscaping. vii. Aesthetic of non -Linear Home Design: The previous plan was criticized based upon the concentration of much of its design on the old recipe: cookie cutter. The new plan includes the planning of the space within the home in relation to space and views within the site — this takes a much higher level of land planning methods not possible before the advent of the technology available today. viii. County Road 110 Access: Previous proposals had multiple access points on County Road 110 and relied on an additional east/west roadway to separate the access points and directed traffic to Cardinal Cove. The current proposal uses closing the trailer court access point to achieve separation of access points. H. Proposed Infrastructure Extensions: The development will involve infrastructure construction and improvement for access, utilities and amenities. i. Roadways No new public roads are proposed within the City. The segments of the development in the City are proposed to be accessed from existing roadways which would be improved as necessary. It is important to note-that access to the individual units is proposed to be provided via private streets connected to existing roadways. The current trailer park access is proposed to be abandoned. Access to developed lots in Minnetrista would be via Halstead Drive and Cardinal Cove. The two riparian lots in Mound would be accessed via Halstead Avenue. ii. Sewer and Water Appropriate sewer and water utility infrastructure would be needed to serve the development. These infrastructure improvements are consistent with current plans previously evaluated by the City. iii. Private Trails Private trails will be constructed connecting each of the units. These trails will be connected to the trail on the south side of County Road 110 per the City's trail plan. Land Use and Natural Feature Conflict: The proposed development is surrounded on two sides by single family detached homes. The homes to the south are on long narrow riparian lots. The homes to the west are across Cardinal Cove Drive which provides significant separation from the proposed development. The property does not have wetlands on site but is heavily wooded. The wooded areas will be protected as much as possible. 4. -382- �^. EXMITA LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 2 That part of Lot 2, Section 22, Township 117 North, Range 24, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing on the West line of Government Lot 2, Section 22, Township 117, Range 24 at a point 325.07 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Lot; thence Southeasterly along the Westerly line of Halsted Park produced 266.5 feet to the Northwesterly side of Halsted Avenue in said Addition; thence Northeasterly along Halsted Avenue a distance of 520.8 fleet to the Easterly line of Koehler Street; which point is the point of beginning of the land to be described: Thence continuing Northeasterly along the Northerly line of Halsted Avenue a distance of 329.2 feet to its intersection with the Easterly line of Halsted Park extended; thence Northwesterly along Easterly line of Halsted park, extended a distance of 242.5 feet to its intersection with a line parallel with and 11.2 chains East of the West line of Government Lot 2; thence North along said line to the center of County Road a distance of 249.86 feet; thence Westerly along the center line of County Road 477.0 feet to the East line of Koehler Street; thence Southeasterly an _ angle of 88 degrees 45 minutes and distance of 281 feet; thence at an angle to the left of this line extended of 18 degrees 17 minutes a distance of 164.0 feet; thence at an angle of 10 degrees 27 minutes to the left of this line extended of 89.1 feet to the point of beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1160821.1 W -0911 J. Impact to Public Facilities: Previous development proposals for this site have evaluated the potential effects on public facilities and concluded that adequate infrastructure is in place to accommodate this development. K. Lakeshore Access: The project will be developed as a common interest community involving pedestrian access to the lake. Docks would be included, however no permanent dock use would be part of this development. L. Open Space: The common areas will be maintained by an association with the intention to support and encourage use of walking trails by the Halstead Pointe Neighborhood with gathering points and benches to facilitate interaction among residents. No designated playground or recreation area is included in this project. M. Project The project is proposed to be constructed in the construction season immediately following approval. 5. Page 1 of 1 Jason Angell From: Fasching, Dave [DFASCHI1 @Fairview.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 2:52 PM To: Jason Angell Cc: horse @medicalevaluations.com; bjohrison @appliedmobon.com; blake.smith @clarkconsulting.com; Gary Ingle; dave.kling @mchsi.com; Vickie L. McCormick; Cheryl. Wheeler @AmericanMedicalSystems.com; Cheryl Fischer; Lisa Whalen Subject: Halstead Point New Sketch Plan - Park Commission Meeting Tonight Hi Jason, Please share the following with the city officials including the Park Commission tonight Regarding the new sketch plan for Halstead Point, please note I have confirmed with the Watershed District that stormwater ponds are considered impervious surface. As a result the current sketch plan does not meet the Shoreland Ordinance maximum impervious surface requirement of 25 %. I think the new sketch plan is an improvement, but the number of units must be reduced from 28 to 21 as directed by City Council to be able to comply with Minnetrista Code and the Shoreland Ordinance (impervious surface, set back, tree ordinance, road width etc). Otherwise, this plan must again be rejected. I would propose that the portion of the land currently occupied by non - conforming trailers be seriously considered for a public park while following the rules for creating association lakefront in fairness to those that live next door. Thanks, Dave Fasching The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or privileged material, including 'protected health information'. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy and delete this message from any computer and contact us immediately by return e-mail. 12/21/2007 -387- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Executive Summary Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ©® TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Jeff Miller, Consulting City Planner DATE: January 16, 2008 SUBJECT: Interim Ordinance No. 02 -2007 (One -Year Moratorium and Interim Regulations for Electronic Signs) and Electronic Sign Ordinance Study The Planning Commission reviewed Interim Ordinance No. 02 -2007, which established a one - year moratorium and interim regulations for electronic signs, and the Electronic Sign Ordinance Study at their January 14th meeting. Interim Ordinance No. 02 -2007 was adopted in February 2007 and expires on February 13, 2008 unless a 60 -day extension is requested. Based on the findings of the Electronic Sign Ordinance Study, Staff recommends that amendments to the existing sign ordinance are not necessary at this time. Although some refinements to the definition and /or standards regarding "changing signs" may be beneficial in the future, amending the ordinance at this time is not necessary to prevent any potential negative impacts of future electronic billboard sign applications that may be submitted to the City. The Planning Commission accepted the report from Staff and recommended that the one -year moratorium and interim regulations for electronic signs be allowed to expire on February 13, 2008 and no extension of the interim ordinances is necessary. Details regarding the study are contained in the Planning Report dated January 7, 2008, and January 14th Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts which have been included. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 14, 2008 BOARD OF APPEALS SIGN MORATORIUM AND ORDINANCE REVIEW — ELECTRONIC SIGNAGE Motion and flashing signs are prohibited. Changing signs are not. Off - premise, free standing advertising signs are prohibited. Staff recommends clarifying "changing sign" regulations. Amending ordinance is not deemed necessary at this time. MOTION by Paulsen, seconded by Stevens, to accept the report and recommend Council take action on the moratorium as recommended by Staff. MOTION carried unanimously. f rD yip 5� ZPi { 3h^w Sc U� fit✓ � 01 �X -390- PLANNING REPORT Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. ®® MIN TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Jeff Miller DATE: January 7, 2008 SUBJECT: Mound Signs Ordinance Study Relating to Electronic Signs BACKGROUND The sign industry has recently developed new technologies for electronic signs that use new types of changing messages, images and movement. In the fall of 2006, large electronic billboard signs began to appear along major roadways in some Minnesota communities, including the City of Minnetonka, using these new technologies. Due to the City's concerns about potential negative impacts of these new types of electronic signs, in February 2007 the City Council established a one -year moratorium and interim regulations for electronic signs, which will expire on February 13, 2008. The intent of the moratorium and interim regulations was to preserve the community's status quo relating to electronic signs while staff studied whether any amendments are needed to the City's existing sign ordinance language regarding electronic signs in City Code Section 365. SUMMARY OF MOUND'S CURRENT SIGN ORDINANCE Mound's existing sign ordinance(City Code Section 365) contains a number of provisions related to electronic signage. The sign ordinance defines three (3) types of electronic or dynamic signs, which are defined as follows: • Changing sign — "A sign which displays copy changes shown on the same lamp bank, such as an electronically or electrically controlled public service, time and temperature sign, message center, or readerboard. " • Flashing sign — "An illuminated sign on which such illumination is not kept constant in intensity or color at all times when such sign is in use. " • Motion sign — "Any sign which revolves, rotates, has any moving parts, or gives the illusion of motion. " Per Subsection 365.15, Subd.3, motion signs or similar devices are prohibited in all districts. Per Subd. 4 of 365.15, "illuminated signs which change in either color or intensity of light" (flashing signs) are prohibited except for signs that provide time, date, temperature, weather or similar public service information. Furthermore, Subd. 14 provides that signs located on the interior of a building cannot contain flashing lights that are visible from the exterior of the building. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -391- P. Z Electronic Sign Ordinance Study January 2008 As defined, changing signs are not prohibited within the City. Within the Central Business (B -1), General Business (B -2) and Light Industrial (L -1) zoning districts, the ordinance has specifically established a maximum size for changing signs: eighteen (18) square feet in total area for exterior signs and twenty -five (25) percent of the total wall window area for window signs. Many of the current large electronic billboard signs in other communities that use the new electronic technologies are off - premise signs. Mound's sign ordinance defines off - premise signs as advertising signs as follows: "a sign selling or promoting a business, commodity, or service which is not located or performed on the premises on which the sign is located". Per Subd. 2 of 365.15, freestanding advertising signs are prohibited in all districts with the exception of temporary signs, which are regulated by Subd. 9 of 365.15. DISCUSSION Cities have the legal authority and responsibility to regulate signs, including electronic signs, for purposes of community safety, values, preferences and aesthetics. There is no uniform system of regulations that must be followed by every city. Any sign regulation must meet basic legal tests, such as rational basis. Since sign regulations have the potential to impact the right to free speech, which is protected by the First Amendment, any sign regulations that are content -based are subject to strict scrutiny review. Any sign regulations that are not based on content are subject to a lower level of scrutiny, which evaluates whether the regulation is substantially related to a significant government interest. Regarding the new dynamic technologies of electronic sign, the concerns are related to technical and visual aspects of the signs, such as nuisance to nearby property owners and drivers, rather than content aspects. As part of researching this issue, Staff has reviewed the study "Dynamic " Signage: Research Related to Driver Distraction and Ordinance Recommendations that was prepared for the City of Minnetonka by the SRF Consulting Group in June 2007 and the Regulating Dynamic Signage memorandum prepared by the League of Minnesota Cities in July 2007. Most of the current large electronic billboard signs using the new technologies in other communities are off - premise signs. Since the existing sign ordinance prohibits permanent off - premise signs, the potential for the City to receive an application for a large electronic billboard sign is very limited. In addition, most of the current large electronic billboard signs are located along major regional freeway corridors. Since Mound does not have any such corridors within the City, it seems unlikely that advertisers and sign companies would be interested in locating a large off - premise electronic billboard sign in Mound. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -392- P. 3 Electronic Sign Ordinance Study January 2008 The existing sign ordinance already prohibits signs that use changing illumination (flashing signs) with the exception of signs that provide time, date, temperature, weather or similar public service information in all districts. The existing sign ordinance also prohibits motion signs, which are defined as signs that physically move — revolve, rotate, have moving parts or give the illusion of moving. The existing sign ordinance defines "changing signs" as signs that have changing copy /messages rather than changing illumination. Since changing signs are not prohibited within the City, it may be beneficial to clarify the definitions of changing signs and flashing signs in the future to account for the new electronic sign technologies, such as animation and video imagery, and/or add a new sign definition. The City's concerns about any potential negative impacts of new electronic sign technologies and large off - premise electronic billboard signs are substantially addressed by the existing sign ordinance's prohibition of permanent off - premise signs. If the City is concerned about potential negative impacts of electronic signs in general, including on- premise signs, the areas of regulation that could be considered include: maximum illumination levels, minimum duration of messages, frequency of message changes, limiting the amount of digital motion on the sign face, size of sign text, etc. RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings of the electronic sign ordinance study, Staff recommends that amendments to the existing sign ordinance are not necessary at this time. Although some refinements to the definition and /or standards regarding "changing signs" may be beneficial in the future, amending the ordinance at this time is not necessary to prevent any potential negative impacts of a future electronic billboard sign application. Staff also recommends that the one -year moratorium and interim regulations not be extended an additional 60 days, which is allowed by the interim ordinance (Ordinance No. 02 -2007) that was adopted in February 2007. 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 -393- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. 02 -2007 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A ONE -YEAR MORITORIUM AND INTERIM REGULATIONS FOR ELECTRONIC SIGNS The City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. Preamble. Mound City Code Chapter 365.15 has regulations which prohibits freestanding advertising signs in all districts (except as governed by City Code Chapter 365.15, Subd. 9), motion signs or similar devices in all districts and illuminated signs which change in either color or intensity of light, with a limited exception of one giving time, date, temperature, whether or similar public service information. Mound City Code Chapter 365.15 also has regulations which prohibits signs which interfere with the ability of vehicle operators or pedestrians to see traffic signals or which impede the vision of traffic by vehicle operators or pedestrians. The sign industry has developed new technology that includes electronic and digital displays that change on a frequent basis. Recent applications in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area has created a need to adopt an interim ordinance to preserve the status quo while staff studies whether the existing ordinance language in City Code Chapter 365 should be amended. This ordinance is adopted under the authority of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 4. Section 2. Planning and Zoning Study. City staff is directed to study the existing ordinance regulations governing revolving, moving, flashing, blinking, animated, and electronic signs and to determine if amendments are advisable. Staff must report back to the City Council before expiration of this ordinance or may request an extension of the ordinance for an additional 60 days. Section 3. Interim Regulations. 3.01. Scope. During the pendency of the study and while this ordinance is in effect, the installation, construction, reconstruction, or expansion of any sign that has any revolving, moving, flashing, blinking, or animated characteristics, any messages that change more frequently than once an hour, or any video display in any zoning district is prohibited. No application for any city approval for such uses will be accepted or granted. 3.02. Exception. The prohibitions in Section 3.01 do not apply to improvements necessary to correct violations of state law and city ordinances that have created a threat to public health and safety as determined by the city. 305918v1 JBD MU220 -4 -394- r Section 4. Enforcement. 4.01. The City may enforce this ordinance by mandamus, injunction or any other appropriate civil remedy. Section 5. Separability, Duration. 5.01. Every part of this ordinance is separate from every other part of the ordinance. Court action that invalidates part of this ordinance does not invalidate any other part of the ordinance. 5.02. This ordinance is effective immediately upon adoption and terminates at the end of February 13, 2008 unless extended pursuant to Section 2. Section 6. Penalty. 6.01. A violation of this ordinance is subject to the penalties and provisions of Chapter 100.60 of the City Code. Each day that the violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. Passed by the City Council this 13th day of February 2007. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Published in the Laker on the 24th day of February, 2007. Effective on the 25th day of February, 2007. 305918v1 JBD MU220 -4 2 -395- MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Hanus and City Council FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent DATE: January 16, 2008 RE: Public Lands Permit —1760 Sumach Lane At the January 10, 2008 POSDC meeting the Commission discussed a Public Lands Permit submitted by Dana Jackson requesting permission from the City to apply for the necessary permits to allow him to mow a portion of cattails on the lakeside of his home which is designated at "Park" and is owned and maintained by the City. The Commission recommended denial of this request. Below is an excerpt from the meeting minutes: Discuss: Public Lands Permit: Dana Jackson —1760 Sumach Lane Fackler summarized the public lands permit submitted by Dana. Jackson. He stated there's been unauthorized mowing by the owner that is prohibited in the flood plain. Staff conducted site visits on this property. Earlier in the year the City fenced off the area and the mowing stopped. The fence was removed and mowing of the cattails began again. DNR Officer Jackie Glazer assisted in a cease and desist order requiring the mowing to stop. If the permit is approved more permitting process may be required by other agencies. The City Engineer, BMI, reviewed site and determined the site meets the requirements for a wet land. Staff recommends denial of the permit. Dana Jackson, 1760 Sumach Lane addressed the Commission. He stated he's had an issue with his neighbor to the east since 1999 when he bought the property. He stated he's mowed the area in question since 1999. The area he's requesting to mow has some cattails that come up through the grass and his neighbors have the same issues. He's requesting that he be allowed to do what his neighbors on either side of him do. He showed photos to the commission. He is requested to mow to the edge of the cattails, as his neighbors on both sides are allowed to do. He stated he had some sink holes and did fill in some low spots. Discussion followed. Mason asked if the other property owners yards extend into the lake and that elevations may be between yards as to where the flood plain is. -396- MOTION by Meisel at 9:37 p.m. to extend the meeting 15 minutes. SECOND by Heywood. Motion carried unanimously. Jackson stated when the area is not mowed it looks unkempt compared to his neighbors. Discussion followed. MOTION by Meisel to recommend denial of the public lands permit as recommended by staff. Discussion followed. The Commission requested Council to make a directive to staff to check his neighbor's property. SECOND by Heywood. Discussion followed. Motion carried unanimously. -397- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 08- RESOLUTION TO DENY A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR 1760 Sumach Lane WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Public Lands Permit for mowing cattails on public property, and WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and WHEREAS, the Parks, Open Space and Docks Advisory Commission unanimously recommended the denial of this request, WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of Tuesday, January 22, 2008, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to deny the Public Lands Permit as submitted by Dana Jackson for 1760 Sumach Lane, Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of January 22, 2008. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Mark Manus CITY OF MOUND — PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5341M vwood Road Mound, MN 55364 PUBLIC LANDS REPORT TO: Parks, Open Space and Docks Advisory Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, Ray Hanson, Planning and Engineering Technician and Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent DATE: January 2, 2008 (revised 1/17/08) SUBJECT: Public Lands Permit Application — Allow mowing in wetland / cattails area on public property located on lakeside of subject property APPLICANT: Dana Jackson PROPERTY: 1760 Sumach Lane REQUEST Dana Jackson, who owns the property at 1760 Sumach Lane, has submitted a Public Lands Permit application and is requesting permission from the City of Mound to apply for the necessary permits to allow him to mow a portion of cattails on the lakeside of his home which is designated as "Park" and is owned and maintained by the City. The subject area has been depicted on the attached survey and has also been shown on the attached photos. 41Ark = 1 Unauthorized mowing on the City- maintained park property was undertaken previously by the owner who was formally advised by both the City and Mn DNR that this type of activity is a violation of local ordinance and DNR rules and/or regulations and is prohibited unless appropriate permits have been received. Additionally, work on public property requires issuance of a Public Lands Permit by the City Council. -399- PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT REGULATIONS 30.01 Special Permits for Certain Structures on Public Land. Subd. 4. Land Alteration. A special land alteration permit shall be required from the City before any alterations are made on public lands which would result in any changes to the following: shoreline, drainage, grade, pitch, slope, trees, or which require the removal or placement of any fill, or which eliminates, adds or develops any access road or land. This section specifically includes any alterations to uses which are nonconforming on the date this ordinance becomes effective. No special permit shall be issued unless approved by a simple majority vote of the Council members.(ORD. 108 -2000, 7/16/00) CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below. Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent: Refer to comments from CDD Smith. Application needs to be reviewed by POSDAC. Kandis Hanson, City Manager: Defer to DNR/MCWD regulations. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director (CDD): 1. Background. A site inspection was conducted on or around May 2, 2007 following a report of unauthorized mowing and /or land alteration activities behind the home. Applicant was formally advised of local ordinance and agency regulations which strictly prohibits this type of work unless proper permits are procured. Wetland buffer signs were installed and the area was fenced off by the City of Mound to allow cattails vegetation to return. In late June, the fence was removed at the direction of the CDD on the condition that the owner discontinues all mowing and/or land alteration activities in the subject area. Throughout mid - summer, when the area was left undisturbed, the cattails quickly grew back and the wetland buffer sign(s) were decreased at the direction of P/E Technician Ray Hanson. In early October, it was learned that mowing activities had again taken place without authorization or permit approvals and a site visit was done by Mound Staff and DNR Conservation Officer Jackie Glazer who issued a Cease and Desist Order. Additionally, the owner was formally notified by the City regarding the unauthorized work and directed to apply for a Public Lands Permit. 2 2. If the public lands permit application is approved, additional permitting processes may be required including but not limited to, an DNR aquatics removal permit, shoreland, floodplain, WCA and/or a local wetlands permit. At this time, it is assumed that these permit applications would be the responsibility of the owner /applicant (with consent from the City of Mound) unless the City Council determines that the City should be responsible for submittal of any and/or all required applications. The POSDAC and Council are advised that Staff will work with the property owner and all involved agencies to determine what specific permits will be needed, if appropriate. 3. Owner is advised that no work is to be done until all permits have been received and evidence of such is provided to the City of Mound. 4. Owner is advised that wetland replacement, if applicable, may be required. 5. The request does not involve the placement of any fill and land alteration activities with the exception of seasonal mowing. Land alteration in a shoreland/floodplain also requires permitting actions. 6. Application submitted and deemed to be complete on November 19, 2007. Applicant is advised that Public Lands Permit applications are not subject to the 60 -day rule as provided in MS 15.99 which was confirmed by the City Attorney. 7. Soil Consultant Mark Perry of Bolton & Menk, who is wetland consultant for the City of Mound, previously viewed the site and determined that the subject area qualifies as "wetlands" due to the vegetation and soils conditions present. He recommends that the area not be mowed to allow the cattails and wetland vegetation to regrow. See detailed comments below: 8. Review of the application by the Planning Commission may be required. Ray Hanson — Engineering /Planning Technician: Refer to memorandum dated November 27, 2007 provided in packet. Dan Faulkner, City Engineer (Bolton & Menk): Refer to attached email dated November 27, 2007 provided in packet. Mark Perry, Soil Scientist (Bolton & Menk): Refer to attached email dated November 27, 2007 provided in packet. Greg Skinner, Public Works Superintendent: No comments. -401- PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to DNR Hydrologist Kate Drewery (or designated Staff), DNR Conservation Officer Jackie Glazer and MCWD District Technician Mike Wyatt. No written comments have been received to date. Based on previous discussions with the DNR Staff, it is the City understands that the DNR generally prefers that these types of areas remain natural. SITE INSPECTION City Officials and Board Members are encouraged to visit the site prior to the meeting. PHOTOGRAPHS Included in application RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial of this permit based on the following findings. 1. Cattails will regrow in subject area due to presence of appropriate soils and vegetation. 2. Property is designated as Parks and is not privately- owned. The subject property presently includes an adequate sized backyard. 4. Cattails provide natural habitat for wildlife and also provide a natural system to help filter sediment and minimize runoff into the lake. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Review of the subject application is subject to review and formal action by the Mound City Council. As of this writing, no meeting date has been established. ATTACHMENTS • Public Lands Permit Application dated November 19, 2007 • Survey showing proposed area to be maintained • Photos of subject area ADDITIONAL DNR COMMENT Neil Vanderbosch. If it is not a public waterway, does not have a Division of Waters number, then it would fall under the Wetland Conservation Act, no permit required for cutting. If it is designated as a public waterway then a permit would be required, permit only issued for recreational access. Rule of thumb for public waters is larger than 2.5 acres. If it is below the ordinary high then it is a part of Lake Minnetonka, they would need a permit. -402- "F g� �s V r 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0614 MEMORANDUM To: Sarah Smith, CDD From: Ray Hanson, Engineering /Planning Technician Date: November 27, 2007 Re: Dana Jackson PL Review 1. The photos were taken after Mr. Jackson cut the cattails down. If given a chance the cattails will grow back to there natural limits. Which they did after the City of Mound requested Mr. Jackson to stop cutting them. 2. The cease and desist order came from the DNR and not the City of Mound. 3. The city has received numerous complaints over the years about Mr. Jackson slowly cutting and filling the wetland area adjacent to his home on city commons property. 4. Aerial photos prior to 1999 show an expanded area of cattails which have since been removed. -403- Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: "Dan Faulkner" <danfa @bolton - menk.com> To: <SarahSmith @cityofmound.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 2:13 PM Subject: FW: Public Land Permit for Dana Jackson Sarah, I've had an opportunity to look through this r equest and I concur with Mark Perry's comments. In looking at the pictures, there does not appear to be a very wide area of cattails now, so the additional area that Mr. Jackson has been mowing would revert to cattails and provide a larger buffer which in turn would provide better treatment to storm water runoff. In addition, other property owners may make similar requests which could have a negative impact on lake water quality if variances would be granted. Dan Faulkner From: Mark Perry Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 11:33 AM To: sarahsmith@cityofmound.com Cc: Dan Faulkner Subject: Public Land Permit for Dana Jackson Sarah, As far as WCA and wetland regulations are concerned, it is not considered a violation to mow /cut vegetation irTa wetland. The real issue is what city ordinance dictates. The wetland buffer ordinance requires a certain buffer width adjacent to wetlands. This wetland is over 5 acres (as part of Lake Minnetonka) and therefore requires a 35 foot buffer. This buffer needs to be left natural and not maintained in order to provide proper protection for the wetland. Based upon what we looked at during our visit, that could place the edge of the buffer right about at his property line (I'm not talking buffer from the main cattails, but from what we tentatively determined to be the edge of wetland which includes the area that he wants to mow). Even if it were his property, the city could require him to leave a 35 foot natural area around the edge of the wetland (as could be required of all lakeside residents). The fact that is it's not his property. Does the city want to allow him to alter the vegetation on city property at all? And if so, does the city want to allow him to violate the wetland buffer zone ordinance? The fact that he has been mowing it for 8 years has no impact on the decision. Since it has never been his property, he should never have mowed it in the first place. The reason that the vegetation is now mainly "..kentucky bluegrass and a few scraggly cattails" is because he has been mowing the area (and filling and trampling and otherwise altering ?), not because it is a poor quality wetland. It is possible, that due to his mowing of the buffer area, he has adversely impacted the wetland and could be held accountable fo r wetland mitigation or restoration. My comment is he should not be allowed to maintain any of this area, unless the city wishes to grant him a variance so that people trying to get to the lake do not walk on his property. If this is the case, I believe a 5 foot strip adjacent to his property line would be an acceptable area to maintain. The area that he has requested to mow should not be mowed or maintained in any other way (other than to remove noxious weeds). Mark Perry, WDC No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.8/1154 - Release Date: 11/27/2007 11:40 AM -404- 1 /3/2008 n CITY OF MOUND Public Land Permit Application Routing and Comment Form Directions: Attached please find a public land permit application submitted by Dana Jackson to allow him to mow the cattails located on the Commons property behind his home at 1760 Sumach Lane. Please be advised that additional public agency permits may also be required if the City Council approves the public lands permit which will require separate and /or independent applications. Please review the application materials and provide all comments regarding its completeness by noon on or before November 29, 2007. Email is acceptable Distribution List: „Area Hydrologist Kate Drewery (Note: Please route to appropriate staff) ✓D — Mike Wyatt (Note: Please route to appropriate staff) Faulkner, City Engineer ferry, BMI wetland reviewer Hannson,P /E Tech and Carlton Moore, Director of PW Skinner, PW Supt. "a r, Parks Supt. Glazer, DNR its Hanson, Mound City Manager Community Development Director Sarah Smith City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 — direct (952) 472 -0679 — fax -405- Y L) 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD V OF MOUND MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com November 29, 2007 Dana Jackson 1760 Sumach Lane Mound, MN 55364 RE: Public Lands Permit Application — Determination of Completeness Please be advised that the Public Lands Permit application submitted on or around November 9, 2007 has been determined to be complete and is tentatively scheduled to be ,forwarded to the POSDAC for review on January 10, 2007. In the event the meeting date changes, you will be notified in advance. At this time, it is unknown whether or not the application needs to be forwarded to the Planning Commission, however, this matter is currently being researched by Staff. Following review and recommendation from the POSDAC (and possibly the Planning Commission), the application will be forwarded to the Council for formal action. Staff also wishes to remind you that no work is to be done on the subject property until any and/or all permits have been approved. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, S gahn Smith munity Development Director p ^ OG _cled paper PUBLIC LANDS APPLICATION 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Mb� Phone 952 -472 -0600 Fax 952 -472 -0620 0 'N Date Received UND ANN Dock Commission Date Mo Council Date DISTRIBUTION Building Official Parks Director LOO0007- DNR MCWD too ■ ■�"�Public Works QIber Check One ❑ CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT — new construction. OTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES O OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (City Code Section 320, Subd. 1) . ❑ PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT — to allow repairs to an existing structure (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). ❑ CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE — to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). LAND ALTERATION — change in shoreline, ra' age, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, Ir^ etc. (City Code Section 320, Subd. 4). "he structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned ands. Structures like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance, which neans that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are ;ranted for a limited time and are non - transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the >ermit is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. APPLICANT Name DA,JA �tD it Address ('Z �� SUJAAC- -t L.A l3 `7�i-i 14 b GZ77 Phone (H) 4--?'Z--S9'30 (tl1!) 95Z- 29'7 -41ZS (M) ABUTTING Address PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Block DESC. Subdivision PID # Plat # ZONING DISTRICT R -1 R -1A R -2 R -3 B -1 B -2 B -3 Public Lands Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 12103103 -407- PUBLIC Name PROPERTY Dock Site # Shoreline Type CONTRACTOR Name Address i. Phone (H) (W) (M) PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) 7->✓a-0 DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSEI 7EG;4� -5 1 i 13E 62A�S 4Sot0If� M� '4840 L- To Mal -� �STFFI�b CATCA' LS . 12000,,./ I KAA--tr--t �t �-%5 10 P,\tP lS;r- I IdAJ� 13E tJ NIDt� D -t' Applicant's Signature -THIS , P21►.�s ?-06 Date q 6U ✓ 206-`7 � (u(aw�� bt Nl� At Ar�� StWS P TttE G o 1, laP�.� Cs�► -�S t5 i 5 b� t�I.A i Nt...`�1 Low .APB A To Cy "t 8 t_.0 �-Pt- da i ltd A vJ �.2A C-16 L`�l Public Lands Permit Application Page 2 of 2 Revised 12/03/03 0 �;� �. i� `� �; ��., 5' { � � �: �� � 4�. I s'�' �� �. An , f � �. t� 4 I T I ,•Kp 7i Rik x Qp B _ ' y _ - t V U r II A 1' 71 r�i err t ih n a - y„ r y u 1 _ x r j ` Y I' r. t � t V tc IVA d I t F t t @ r,�r •sj,l �I? Jr SG, Y� r ht � tK ±c �' �i r � 7.�•'r + "t.' �..�i ., ,fie �^?w .. , re N ow, Vf R ` t I 4 �y F 1 tr M1 V11 a- � F � F Y Mf i 1 11 V Il Ii .. + jjr 4 1 +l }fi { ` f - J v s . F {die 4 � C � y + 1 r q., •Ar it Y i.. Ak,,. . ` y z 14� ° d t J r„ ,� _; � ^x" ai ��1 1 • , ,� '"r 'd` ray. ®R-,,ity.�.1� s � y};.,>a,�XlYM6, ;es*-• :_ a r:, i� t xa .. -°' i � 4 � 8 t c f L , df• x - M oh `,� ,�f S °'I, �••rY�. +� r _ -... �4. � 4' §' �- M1 � x h ,� 4 fie'.. ryy.- � �'Y.. •� � aRV 'y",p � 2 � t j c k "� Y k " +a �' . �' xt-0,k ••" �' %y�'�`�y�'dX� I t �f ���k p> -��tp ' 'r � ti��.,� - vl1(i I ;ifs. -•. � Pr�f'� 'I 1., aw mss• ' �. �Wa�eN" ;va" 7 man c a �3 Illy ry t j a Yyr d fN a fy�nxd; 4 x ��114� 1 v� h 4 4w It Z` iNp a, xm- � '- s' ! � '� try t, Ir�,S t �'• I r` ... x n d 1- t 1 0 AW Io i 26 xl p � r1 F rid ,:+ }7 41l �r r °OWL y a ism �fq 4 4 f' I �l k � 4�xb u e. WOO c ,rr i s lye I q t %4 i2$f Gi'41 .. A � a..s I 4 ?�R Ei ��J ' 94.52 N pp�+o 1 151'iE ri (�U 21 1 , SWE SET �,,.• LINDER (932.2) '.. (932.8) 1 1 ............1.`a �....... 1 r •., N' LY LINE 1 (932.8) 1 BLOCKT139 ( 932.5) (933.1) BLACKTOP,' 1' 24.4 . -_i rY/ SHADYWOOD POINT 1 7 EXISTING a EXISTING , GARAGE p�••'` f Q�USE ) O ` (933.1) (93 28) i (934.4) (933.0) 1 .____________"____________ 1 (933.4) DIRT HOUSE EXISTING 12.5 tie STOOP � 933.2) ero , 1 26.8 933,2 I CONC. 3 EXISTING 1 O EXISTING (933.7) o HOUSE ' HOUSE T (933,4) ' 17.2 #1760 2,a. 1 (i 1 2 1 1 CONCRETE O c DECK (9329); 14.5 (,) (931.7) •` . (930) ' LY LINE 1 F LOT 20, 1 1 LOCK 13, 1 HADYWOOD POINT 1 ' 1.00 NW SJ' W ..(930.5) ' .�ticC't 1 1 N 82-30,33" p W 5g 90-23 (930/ A I I/ Yip � 12-� Arr�A rr�- ULST'l =.D 929.4 CONTOUR LINE 3E hwv� O , C.ATTA t is LAKE MINNETONKA HARRISON'S BAY -416- 0 U1 A .� CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR DANA L. JACKSON IN LOTS 12, 19, & 20, BLOCK 13, SHADYWOOD POINT HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA` LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES : N 60 SW COR OF OF LOT 20, ............ .. -•� " BLOCK 13, SHADYWOOD POINT That part of Lots 19, and 20, Block 13, Shodywood Point, lying easterly of a line running northerly, parallel with the westerly line of said Block 13 thereof, from a point on the southerly line of said Lot 20 distant 91.00 feet easterly of the Southwest corner thereof, as measured along said southerly line, Also that part of Lot 12, said Block 13 lying southerly of the easterly extension of the northerly line of said Lot 19, Block 13. o denotes iron marker (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation, mean sea level datum Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, and the location of two existing buildings thereon. It ,does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. uc�wr� -� nev�awn DATE DESCRP'nON DRAWN —C ECD CFECKED MSG 04-158 —417— PRELIMINARY AS OF 01 -14 -08 CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT Dec. 2007 100.00% Dec. 07 YTD PERCENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED GENERALFUND Taxes 3,643,886 1,774,186 3,619,629 - 24,257 99.33% Business Licenses 19,600 75 18,150 -1,450 92.60% Non - Business Licenses /Permit 243,300 33,820 197,576 - 45,724 81.21% Intergovernmental 318,060 88,956 320,985 2,925 100.92% Charges for Services 92,000 1,638 97,923 5,923 106.44% Court Fines 100,000 4,657 50,245 - 49,755 50.25% Street Lighting Fee 108,000 9,218 100,644 -7,356 93.19% Franchise Fees 298,000 7,604 253,201 - 44,799 84.97% G.O. Equipment Certificates 165,000 0 179,820 14,820 108.98% Charges to Other Dpts 12,000 1,442 8,137 -3,863 67.81% Park Dedication Fees 0 0 3,300 3,300 0.00% Other Revenue 262,500 16,592 91,131 - 171,369 34.72% TOTAL REVENUE 5,262,346 1.93 8.189 4,940,741 -321,695 FIRE FUND 828,890 47,178 834,325 5,435 100.66% DOCK FUND 155,573 0 154,976 -597 99.62% MOUND HRA 94,320 43,727 95,036 716 100.76% WATER FUND 950,000 128,328 892,953 - 57,047 94.00% SEWER FUND 1,450,000 113,265 1,282,690 - 167,310 88.46% LIQUOR FUND 2,400,000 259,633 2,525,960 125,960 105.25% RECYCLING FUND 158,500 10,529 160,283 1,783 101.12% STORM WATER UTILITY 135,820 12,928 142,870 7,050 105.19% INVESTMENTS (Net of Exp) 29,031 665,985 665,985 ^A /A A 111A^0 v u ,t.rvry rev2007 Gino w r PRELIMINARY AS OF 01 -14 -08 CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT December 2007 100.00% Dec.2007 YTD PERCENT BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED GENERAL FUND 828,621 62,906 802,455 26,166 96.84% Council 84,590 11,358 80,516 4,074 95.18% Promotions 5,500 0 5,500 0 100.00% City Manager /Clerk 336,445 33,549 327,710 8,735 97.40% Elections 2,850 12 2,103 747 73.79% Finance 362,470 36,946 356,870 5,600 98.46% Assessing 86,950 21 87,968 -1,018 101.17% Legal 135,460 10,437 115,470 19,990 85.24% City Hall Building & Srvcs 112,270 7,842 81,513 30,757 72.60% Computer 13,950 5,969 12,279 1,671 88.02% Police 1,743,398 196,848 1,735,847 7,551 99.57% Emergency Prepardeness 7,100 3,493 6,360 740 89.58 %0 Planning /Inspections 431,051 24,452 326,135 104,916 75.66% Streets 889,269 91,561 940,133 - 50,864 105.72% Parks 465,399 40,772 436,848 28,551 93.87% Park Dedication Fees 60,000 81,285 126,285 - 66,285 210.48 % Cemetery 10,447 0 8,557 1,890 81.90% Recreation - 51000 0 2,060 2,940 4f.200/. Transfers 467,783 38,982 467,784 -1 100.00% Cable TV 43,000 0 32,764 10,236 76.20% Contingencies 16.700 131 19.312 -2.612 115.64% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 5. 279. 632 Dam 5.172.014 107.618 IZ= Area Fire Service Fund 828,621 62,906 802,455 26,166 96.84% Dock Fund 195,609 9,929 100,317 95,292 51.28% Capital Projects 1,480 355,654 4,438,381 - 4,436,901 Parking Deck 1 0 205,492 4,719,466 - 4,719,466 TIF 1 -2 Downtown Mound 0 0 173 -173 TIF 1 -3 MHR 0 11,336 20,296 - 20,296 Water Fund 1,085,060 167,160 1,254,616 - 169,556 115.63% Sewer Fund 1,398,168 162,491 1,548,216 - 150,048 110.73% Liquor Fund 528,186 42,692 497,823 30,363 94.25% Recycling Fund 171,531 30,789 189,384 - 17,853 110.41% Storm Water Utility 143,040 41,364 205,413 - 62,373 143.61% -419- ,FROM : LMCD FAX NO. : 7459085 Dec. 27 2007 i1:32AM P4 DRAFT LADE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE DENSITY' OF STORAGE OF WATEI2,CRAFT ON LAKE MINNETONKA; ADDING NEW SUBDMSIONS 8, 9 AND 10 TO Lh4CD CODE, SECTION 2.02 ITEM 1C THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT ORDAINS as follows: Section 1. LMCD Code Section 2.02 is amended by adding new Subdivisions 8, 9 and 10, as follows: Subditiisign 8 Shoreline O}�i ide of L CD Jurisdicf�on For ourooses of this Section, shoreline that is not within the jurisdiction of the LMCD may not be counted for ptunoses of calculating allowable watercraft density -- — Subdivision 9 Inaccessible Shoreline For y=oses of jWs Section, share ' e that not accessible max not be counted forr Rg mscs of calolating; ailowaable watercraft density. Shoreline will be considered to be inaccessible ilk it can be reacbecl only by pAsing under a bridge with less than three %et of clearance when the Lake is at elevation 929.4 NOVD or if it g reached only by .l i, g through a channel ee of wia with a d th of at 1 f t Ntm the Lake is 6"a on 929A N{3VDl aerpLs all of the I2 -fo9t width If dredging, is Mtlired to y.WW §tg four fleet of de_Lgh across a 12 -foot , y dth of ehatulel the shoreline will be deemed gpgmib& if drsng is completed Ifall govet mePtal RaMiU #eve b= secuMd for such dredging, th may a dock license on the condition rhy r such drodginQ be completed prior to eonstmction ofwateremft storage facilities. Subdl -on 10 Shoreline of Shallow Dock Use Atoms For Mom of calculating t lio mo-W of shoreline at a site under this Sectiom i9l shoreline that has three fqg or more of water depth nift X00 feet shall be given full crcdi ,Ail shoreline that has three feet of water doth within 200 feet but not within 100 feet shall be co t�e�i at, Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective the day following its publication. 324754VI CLLLKI10 -4 -420- FROM : LMCD � r FAX N0. : 7459085 Dec. 27 2007 11:33AM P5 Adopted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of DiTectom this day Of , 2007. ATTEST: Date of Publication: Effective Date- 324754V] CL.L.LKI 104 Secretary -421- 2 Torn Skramstad, Chair FROM : LMCD FAX NO. : 7459085 Dec. 27 2007 11:32AM P3 A'I-F a-T- secrewy Date of Publication: Effective Date: 324752VI CLL LKI 10,4 p) -422- Tom Skramstad, Chair FROM : LMCD DRAFT r FAX NO. : 74S908S Dec. 27 2007 11:31RM P2 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO WATERCRAFT STORAGE DENSITY AND VARIANCES FOR DOCK LENGTH; ADDINCr NEW SUBDIVISION 10 TO LMCD CODE, SECTION 1.07 ITEM is THE 80AR.D OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAKE MINNETONKA CONSFAV'ATiON DISTRICT ORDAINS as follows: Section 1. LMCD Code Section 1.07 is amended by adding new subdivision 10 as follows: Subdivision 10 'Watercraft Storage Density Adjustments When variances to the length limitations of Cade Section 2.01, Subdivision 2 a) aregranted after the . ective date of this ordinnce, the density of restlicted watercraft allowed at the dock facility shall be adjusted as follows: The Board may also -most limitations on the number of unrestricted w and the size of watercraft at the fac' 't . Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective the day following its publication. Adopted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors this day of , 2007. 324752v1 CLL LKl l M it -423- Density allowed Will be Adiusted from: Will be Adjusted to: under Code Section Forvariances up to 100 feet beyond the length limits of Sec2.Q2 Sd 2a? 2.02, Subd, I 1 restricted watercraft Der l restricted watercraft ged 00 fW of s oreline 50 ofs1wreffne Q ubd. 2 watercra ' ted watercraft _j..024uS.Ubd,3 4 WncW war ft 2 restricted w For variances of 100 or more feet beyond the let mth�,im-its of Sec. 2.02. 2.02, Subd, l Subd. I Te_strieted watq=ftper I restricted watcarctaft feet of sh ine 2 cfcd er 250 f s oreli 1 re tr c w swag } 1 restricted watercraft (S _ 5ubd 3 4 restricted watere ft The Board may also -most limitations on the number of unrestricted w and the size of watercraft at the fac' 't . Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective the day following its publication. Adopted by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors this day of , 2007. 324752v1 CLL LKl l M it -423-