Loading...
2000-11-08Mound City Council Minutes - ~Vovember 8, 2000 MOUND CITY COUNCIl, MINUTES - NOVEMBER The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, November 8, 2000, at 7:30p.m., in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Pat Meisel; Council Members: Andrea Ahrens, Bob Brown, Mark Hanus, and Leah Weycker. Also in attendance were Acting City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Fran Clark and the following interested citizens; Ken and Sally Custer, Bill and Dorothy Netka, Kevin England and Peter Meyer. *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. OPEN MEETING - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA & REGULAR AGENDA. Councilmember Brown asked to have the Item A, the Minutes of the October 14, 2000, Regular Meeting pulled from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Weycker asked to have Item D, Morton Lane: Hasbro Co. Bioremediation Process pulled from the Consent Agenda. *CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by ttanus, seconded by Brown to approve the two remaining items on the Consent Agenda. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. *1.0 PAYMENT OF BILLS. MOTION, Hanus, Brown, unanimously. *1.1 APPROVE PLANS AND SET BID OPENING FOR MOUND COAST TO COAST DEMOLITION: 11:00 AM, NOV 22. MOTION, Hanus, Brown, unanimously. Mound Cio~ Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 1.2 MINUTES: OCTOBER 24 REGULAR MEETING. Councilmember Brown stated that on page 4511, 3rd paragraph, middle sentence, should read as follows: "He stated that he was not in favor of putting more teeth in this to allow for enforcement." Councilmember Brown asked that on page 4512, paragraph 3, the last sentence be deleted and replaced with the following: "He stated there is a possibility he may have been wrong." Councilmember Weycker stated she has a change on Page 4508, fourth paragraph from the bottom should have the following sentence added to it: "We need to check out where the name Pembroke came from, because this was an issue when we named Sorbo Park." Councilmember Weycker also asked that on page 4513, it be clarified which was the vote on the motion and which was the vote on calling the question. The calling of the question came before the vote on the Resolution. MOTION made by Weycker, seconded by Brown to approve the Minutes of the October 14, 2000, Regular Meeting, as amended above. The vote was unanlmotisly in favor. Motion carried. 1.3 MORTON LANE: HASBRO CO. BIOREMEDIATION PROCESS 1. APPROVE EASEMENT AGREEMENT 2. APPROVE AGREEMENT TO TRANSFER LAND 3. APPROVE AMENDMENT TO STREET VACATION RESOLUTION TO: CORRECT INCORRECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION ACKNOWLF. DGE THAT ALL PRECONDITIONS TO RECORDING THE RESOLUTION HAVE TAKEN PLACE. Councilmember Weycker stated that she asked to have this item removed from the Consent Agenda because she did vote in favor the original resolution and would not be voting in favor of this correction. Brown moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION g00-109 RESOLUTION TO CORRECT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESOLUTION//00-65 VACATING A PORTION OF MORTON LANE STREET RIGHT- OF-WAY, P & Z CASE g00-29 The vote was 4 in favor with Weycker voting nay. Motion carried. Kevin England was present at this meeting. 1.4 CANVASSING OF VOTES FROM THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION, NOVEMBER 7, 2000. Mound City Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 The following remits of the November 7, 2000, Municipal Election were presented to the City Council: Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. Pct. TOTAL I 3 ~_ 4__ s_ 6 MAYOR TOM CASEY 175 173 630 282 250 274 1784 DAVID GREENSLIT 115 101 309 161 259 150 1095 PAT MEISEL 236 164 552 392 417 256 2017 COUNCIl,MEMBER ANDREA AHRENS 103 88 292 178 183 130 KIM ANDERSON 185 165 612 299 288 305 ORV BURMA 91 46 328 159 214 100 JAMIE J. DEMARAIS 49 54 103 66 98 71 PETER C. MEYER 210 173 497 269 286 291 GARY T. MOTYKA 38 46 88 122 105 73 JASIN SASANFAR 12 17 81 29 29 24 NICOLE SVEUM 41 47 120 59 75 64 BILL VOSS 144 108 408 224 272 131 472 974 1854 938 441 1726 192 406 1287 The Canvassing Board hereby certifies that election to a two year Mayoral term is Pat Meisel and two, four year Council terms are: Kim Anderson and Peter C. Meyer. Brown moved and Hanus seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #00-110 RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF THE MUNIC~ ELECTION AS PRESENTED AT ~ CANVASS OF VOTE OF THE NOVEMBER 7, 2000, GENERAL MUNICIPAL EI,F, CTION The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carded. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ON ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. (LIMIT TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER.) There were none. 1.5 ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE EXEMPTING CERTAIN SIGNS FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 365 OF TIlE MOUND CODE. The City Attorney explained that the current code outlaws all signs in Mound unless they come within a specific exemption to the ordinance. Recently, the City received an application from 3 Mound City Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 a property owner to install signs on private property that regulated parking in a private parking lot and Staff was reviewing it to determine if it was a request for a sign permit. It was the result of that review that prompted the proposed ordinance amendment in front of the City Council tonight which would exempt this type of sign from needing a permit. Staff has recommended approval. Hanus moved and Weycker seconded the following: ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE EXEMPTING CERTAIN SIGNS FROM ~ REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 356 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.6 STAFF REPORT ON ACTIVITIES WITI:I MINNEHAI:IA WATERSHED DISTRICT AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. Dan Parks of MFRA reviewed his memo date November 2, 2000, regarding the Mound SWMP (Storm Water Management Plan) - Wetland Buffer Language. The City Council discussed Mr. Park's memo. They asked to have the word "require" changed to "encourage". They also asked how the Watershed District defines "major development proposal". The Council discussed buffer widths. The Council reviewed Staff's suggested buffer language as follows: "The City will require natural, unmaintained wetland buffers around existing wetlands or replacement wetlands in major development proposals. The buffer shall be a native, unmaintained vegetative strip planted with legumes or other perennial plant materials. Buffer widths will be based on the size of the abutting wetland as shown on Table 6 below. In addition, the City will encourage the placement of 20 foot natural buffers around all City lakes, wetlands and waterbodies." After discussion the Council asked that the following amendment to the above be used. "The City will ~ encouraee natural, ~ wetland buffers around existing wetlands or replacement wetlands in major development proposals. The buffer shall be a native, ~va'traimaimd vegetative strip.~,,,,.,ll~d-' .... -,~-iah" legumes ,.,, .... ,,..~,'--- pcrcnnlal bla.-i~,,.,,L~.-,~.'-'- Buffer widths will be based on the size of the abutting wetland as shown on Table 6 below. In placcn~cn~ of "" foot ...... ' '---'"'--- .......... Mr. Park's pointed out that he feels the Watershed District will insist on the word "require" instead of "encourage". 4 Mound City Council Minutes - November 8, 2000 Mr. Parks al~o added that he will look at the MOund City Code that shows the difference between a minor and major subdivision and would include that in the City's proposal which would address the major development proposal question that was asked earlier. There was considerable discussion on the wetland buffers widths. Mr. Parks advised the City Council that the Watershed District is now undertaking an effort to do the functions and values of the wetlands starting out with four communities and Mound is one of their primary communities. If the City had to do the functions and values of the wetlands it would cost between $15,000 and $20,000. That will relieve Mound of the responsibility to do this. Mr. Parks suggested taking the data from the functions and values assessment of Mound wetlands to determine how each of these wetlands are working in the eeo system and then determine a buffer and perhaps a larger management plan to preserve and protect those wetlands for whatever they are best .suited for. Mr. Parks thought the functions and values assessment would be done sometime in early 2001 and we could walt for that and then revisit the wetlands in the City and determine buffers at that time. MOTION made by Itanus, seconded by Brown to submit "The City will reqnire encourage natural, ~ wetland buffers around existing wetlands or replacement wetlands in major develepment proposals. The buffer shall be a native, ~ vegetative strip. ...... ' A erage Buffe widths will be based on the size of the abutting wetland as shown on Table Adso ~n¢]nded in tee motion is changing TaMe 6 to 50%, plus or m~nus. ~le vote W~LS .nan~motls]y ~1 favor. Motion carried. INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS A. LMCD report. B. LMCC report. C. Westonka Senior Center report. D. AMM FAX News. E. Westonka Public School communications. F. Planning Commission minutes: Oct 23. G. Article: How to Become a Better Governing Board Member. H. Article: Your Minutes Should Not be a Blow-by-Blow Account. I. Analysis of the cost for one-day leaf drop-off. J. TRAC Correspondence. MOTION made by Brown, seconded by Hanus to adjourn at 8:20 P.M. The vote was nnanimous]y in favor. Motion carried. 5 Mound City CounciL~linutes - November 8, 2000 ~ 6 t'AYMENT BILLS DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 2000 BILLS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BATCtt # #0102 #0103 AMOUNT. $ 87,402.13 $106,219.31 TOTAL BILLS $193,621.44