Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2010-06-08
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 0 AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 2010 - 7:00 PM MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS * Consent A ems Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. * Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes: May 25, 2010 regular meeting 1077 -1081 *B. Approve payment of claims 1082 -1106 *C. Adopt Resolution Appointing Absentee Ballot Board 1107 *D. Approve Rip -Rap Quote for 4857 & 4853 Island View Drive 1108 -1116 *E. Approve Liquor License Renewals 1117 -1126 *F. Approve Pay Request No. 8 from GMH Asphalt Corporation in the 1127 -1128 amount of $27,798.40 for the 2009 Street, Utility and Lift Station Improvement Project, City Project No's. PW- 09 -01, 09 -02, 09 -04, 09 -06 *G. Adopt Resolution Amending Resolution Approving Specific Sign 1129 -1139 Program for Comprehensive Signage for Auditor's Road A-Ad e{ - J)�,m evict s ► r, N Ae r m i +- F-a rvy) ers. - Alfa r )LeJ. 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Police Chief Jim Kurtz requesting action on a Resolution Recognizing and 1140 -1141 Congratulating the Mound Police Explorer Post for their State Championship Performance at the 2010 Police Explorer Conference 7. Discussion/action on staff recommendation for 2010 Central Business District 1142 -1157 0 (CBD) Parking Program PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 8. Public Hearinizs — 7:30 b.m. A. Planning Commission Recommendation: Consideration of ordinance 1158 -1178 • amending Section 129 of the Mound City Code as it relates to the Zoning Ordinance (official map) for proposed zoning amendment for Bethel United Methodist Church property located at 2116 Commerce Boulevard to change classification from B -1 to R -3 Applicant: City of Mound B. 2009 Storm Water Pollution Program (SWPPP) Annual Report, as presented 1179 -1181 by Mark Perry of Bolten & Menk 9. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Reports: Three Rivers Park District meeting agenda 1182 -1184 Public Works Dept Take -Home Vehicles 1185 Engineering Project Status 1186 -1187 Minnehaha Creek Shoreline & Wetland Rule 1188 -1200 Summary C. Minutes: Planning Commission: May 2, 2010 1201 -1205 Docks & Commons Commission: May 20, 2010 1206 -1207 D. Correspondence: Mound Transit Center receives Award for 1208 -1209 Outstanding Planning and Urban Design 10. Adjourn 9 This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www.citvofinound.com • MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES • MAY 25, 2010 The City Council for the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, May 11, 2010, at 7:30 p.m. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers David Osmek, Ray Salazar, and Heidi Gesch Members absent: Councilmember Greg Skinner Others present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Amanda Schwarze, Chris Oliveira, Marty Woods, Andrew Sheehan, Nicole Kilby, Thomas Stokes, Chuck Alcon, Dana McCarville, Don McCarville, Fred Merrill, Troy Tasche, Julie Tasche, Vince Forystek, Barb Flug, Meredith Brandt, Tim Hartman, Cara Otto, Stephanie Lolich, Kaitlyn Tierney, Valory Schoenecker. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda •' MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of the May 11, 2010 regular meeting B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $262,469.44 C. Approve Right of Entry Authorization for Watercraft Inspections S. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None were offered. 6. Action on Resolution Recognizing DECA Students MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Osmek to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 10 -32: RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING DECA STUDENTS FOR THEIR "LITTLE FOR LIGHTS" FUNDRAISER Mayor Hanus read the above noted resolution and presented copies to Keitlyn Tierney and Valory Schoenecker of the DECA group. • -1077- Mound City Council Meeting — May 25, 2010 7. LMCD draft budget for 2011 Steve Johnson, Mound's representative to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, presented a draft of the proposed 2011 LMCD budget. Hanus noted that Mound's share is slightly less than this year. No action needed. 8. Plannina Cases #10- 03/10- 04/10 -05 — Waiver of Plattina /boundary adjustments at 5248 Sulgorove Lane Sarah Smith reviewed the application submitted by Brenshell Corporation, to divide the subject property into four lots. The applicant is requesting a waiver of platting, two variances and a minor boundary adjustment to subdivide the property. She noted that letters have been received from neighbors who have concerns over the proposed development. Hanus asked about the discrepancies of lot line measurements that show on the survey, and Chuck Alcon, representing Brenshell, stated that this is not unusual with old surveys being compared to the ones today because of the GPS equipment, etc. He will verify actual measurements. • Tom Stokes stated that he took offense to one of the letters given to the Council. He stated he has shown as much generosity and support of Mound as anyone in his 25 years here. This project is a solution for the community, with 6,000 square foot lots that allow for attractive smaller homes. Osmek agreed that Stokes has given to the community, being instrumental in the skate park construction, etc, and to be drug through the mud is out of bounds. With this said, Osmek stated this case has to stand on its own merit not the personal feelings for the • developer. Barb Flug, 5251 Sulgrove, addressed the Council stating that her letter was not meant to be offensive and just wants the request to be considered on its own merits. Troy Tasche, 5238 Sulgrove, stated that there are properties in the neighborhood that have been for sale for three years. Dividing the property for one or two homes would be fine, but he is opposed to putting four homes in there. Chris Oliveira, 5232 Seabury Rd, asked how the mailboxes will be handled, and how the sewer and water trunk charges mentioned will affect him. Hanus explained that the infrastructure in that area is old and will be repaired as needed when the streets are reconstructed, resulting in an assessment to him as well as everyone else on the project. The actual trunk charges that are being referenced will not have a negative effect on him and the city actually benefits from those charges because they go into the utility funds. Tom Stokes stated that he will construct a nice stand for the mailboxes and donate it to the community. Don McCarville, 3349 Warner Lane, stated that the proposed development doesn't match the ordinance for realigning lot lines, and that in the plat all the other houses in the block are larger so it is not the same development as in the rest of the block. He stated he applied for a variance years ago and was denied. Hanus stated he asked himself the same question as to matching the neighborhood so he looked at the next block and counted the lots and sizes. Nine lots are 6400 sq. ft. or less and eight are around 10,000 or more. So it's really about 50/50 as to the lot sizes matching the neighborhood. • -1078- Mound City Council Minutes — May 25, 2010 • Vince Forystek, 3131 Inverness, stated that based on the explanation given, any lot platted in this town, as long as there's a line, can be changed by waiver of platting. Hanus stated that there are many tools available and in this case there is more than one tool being used, making it unique. There are currently acceptable tools and vehicles to do these things. Forystek stated that based on what's happening any lot line can be changed. He stated our town is like the armpit of Lake Minnetonka and he owns a lot of this town and tries to improve it. This proposal has two corner lots being developed and two of the four lots will be very small. Meredith Brandt, 3367 Warner Lane, is concerned about how this is being conducted. She asked if the property can be developed without variances, but not divided for four homes, and asked the Council to deny this request because she feels four homes is asking for too much. Hanus stated that this property can be divided into four lots and meet all of the code requirements. The lots are conforming in size and he believes can be built fully conforming without variances. If someone proposes that, he stated he'd be hard pressed to find someone that would turn it down under those conditions. Barb Flug asked that if something can be done, is it automatically approved? Hanus stated he's speaking for himself, but if someone comes in with a subdivision that is completely conforming to our current code, there would be no grounds for denial. John Dean explained the subdivision process. Tom Stokes stated that he met with City staff and they came up with the best way to get four lots. He felt this is the best compromise to get relatively small homes constructed, which is what •' the market is calling for. Marty Woods, 5360 Edsall Road, asked if the stormwater drainage issue had been addressed and asked about the curb cuts. Stokes answered that there is a storm drain at Warner & St. Mary's, and there is plenty of elevation so that drainage is not an issue. It is proposed to have all surmountable curbs. Osmek stated that there are benefits to this, the creation of additional tax base, receipt of additional stub fees that go into the sewer and water fund, and when it comes to reconstructing the streets in that area, there would be three additional properties to share the assessment costs. He doesn't feel that this qualifies for a waiver of platting. Hanus agreed that there are vehicles that can be used to accomplish what they want, but waiver of platting is not it. Gesch and Salazar agreed that waiver of platting should not be utilized in this case. Chuck Alcon asked that action be tabled so that the developer can go back and work with staff for an alternative method and a different solution. He indicated that they would agree to any extensions of the timetable. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to direct staff to draft a resolution of denial of the waiver of platting, boundary adjustment requests, and variances, with findings of fact, so that if this application isn't withdrawn when a new plan is presented, the resolution can be acted upon. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 1� -1079- Mound City Council Minutes — May 25, 2010 MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to table this item. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Osmek provided a further staff directive, that council requests that staff provide this back within the current timeframe, which is no later than the first meeting in July. Also, if the applicant does make significant changes away from a four -lot to a different configuration, this go back to the Planning Commission if staff so deems that be required. 9. Plannina Case #10 -07 — Woodlvn Ridae Subdivision Project — 6301 Lvnwood Blvd Sarah Smith reviewed that the applicant, Tim Hartman, has submitted a final plat for an 11 -lot single family development named "Woodlyn Ridge ". The 4.17 acre property was subdivided in 2008 using the Planned Development Area - Conditional use Permit (PDA -CUP) process. She stated that the final plat is consistent with the previously approved preliminary plat. Hanus stated that at the time of the preliminary plat, the averaging of the hardcover was discussed. He asked that if after the final plat is approved, can a homeowner come in and request a variance from the hardcover requirement. John Dean stated that they can request a variance, but the PDA and CUP would have to be amended if that variance would take the average below 30 %. John Dean suggested that the document stating hardcover for each lot should be a part of the development agreement. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. C7 RESOLUTION NO. 10 -33: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR WOODLYN RIDGE RESIDENTAIL DEVELOPMENT AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adopt the following resolution, with the individual lots' hardcover being included as an exhibit. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 10 -34: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH TIMOTHY D HARTMAN FOR THE WOODLYN RIDGE SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 10 -35: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE EARLY START AGREEMENT FOR THE WOODLYN RIDGE SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 10 -36: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A WETLAND BUFFER DECLARATION FOR THE WOODLYN RIDGE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. • Motion carried. -1080- • Mound City Council Minutes — May 25, 2010 RESOLUTION NO. 10 -37: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE TRAIL EASEMENT AGREEMENTS FOR THE WOODLYN RIDGE SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 10 -38: RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 08-16,08-16,08- 17, AND 08 -114 FOR WOODLYN RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED AT 6301 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD TO CORRECT TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS IN LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS 10. Discussion /action on Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Mound City Code as it Pertains to Council Meetings MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to pass the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 02-2010: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT PERTAINS TO COUNCIL MEETINGS 11. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager - Gesch stated that the Parks and Open Space Commission is meeting on June 10, at 6:30 p.m. at the Greenway and on July . 8, at 6:30 p.m. at Swenson Park, to do clean -up of these areas. Members of the public are invited to participate. B. Reports: 2010 Open Book Meeting — May 5, 2010 Finance Department —April 2010 Fire Commission Meeting Agenda — May 19, 2010 C. Minutes: Parks and Open Space Commission —May 13, 2010 D. Correspondence: Letter from Lake Minnetonka Association Fire Department Fish Fry — June 5, 2010 12. Adjourn MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adjourn at 9:25 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -1081- JUNE 8 2010 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1 052010CRCARD $3,914.72 MAY I 1 052610SUE $1,582.30 MAY I 1 060210SUE $34,606.91 JUNE 1 060810SUE $182,035.25 JUNE • TOTAL $2229139.18 0 -1082- -1083- CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 8:42 AM Page 1 Payments AL CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2010 Batch Name 052010CRCARD User Dollar Amt $3,914.72 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,914.72 $0.00 In Balance Refer 52010 ELAN CREDIT CARD _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -434 Conference & Training 04 -07 -10 GRANDVIEW LODGE, MANAGERS $464.08 CONFERENCE Invoice 4173 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -431 Meeting Expense 04 -15 -10 OX YOKE INN, MTG $15.08 W/MINNETRISTA CITY MANAGER Invoice 4696 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -321 Telephone & Cells 04 -30 -10 CELULAR CONNECTION, CELL $16.08 PHONE JACKET Invoice 5403 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -430 Miscellaneous 05 -03 -10 BACHMANS, OFFICE, HANSON, K $80.42 Invoice 1794 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -430 Miscellaneous 04 -27 -10 MY WEATHER $1.98 Invoice 9632 -A 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -430 Miscellaneous 04 -27 -10 MY WEATHER $1.98 Invoice 9632 -B 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -430 Miscellaneous 04 -27 -10 MY WEATHER $1.99 • Invoice 9632 -C Cash Payment 5/2012010 E 101- 42110 -431 Meeting Expense 04 -08 -10 LUNDS, CAKE FOR ANNUAL $34.99 MEETING Invoice 2797 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -431 Meeting Expense 04 -08 -10 FAMOUS DAVES, LUNCH FOR $343.15 ANNUAL MEETING Invoice 3837 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -431 Meeting Expense 04 -08 -10 SUPERAMERICA, MOUND, ANNUAL $4.49 MEETING Invoice 9359 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training 04 -13 -10 GRANDVIEW LODGE, MOORE $325.36 Invoice 1718 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -300 Professional Srvs 04 -28 -10 HENNEPIN COUNTY P/W, $265.00 ELECTRONIC SIGN CTY RD 110 Invoice 7959 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair/Maint Supply 04 -12 -10 NORTHER TOOL, TOW CHAIN $198.39 Invoice 1006 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training 04 -09 -10 MN GOVERNMENT, GFOA $30.00 LUNCHEON Invoice 0024 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 04 -12 -10 TRYOEMTODAY.COM $55.03 Invoice 4248 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -200 Office Supplies 04 -20 -10 INET7 WEB HOSTING SERVICES $43.90 Invoice 0019 5/20/2010 Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds 04 -27 -10 OFFICE MAX, BIN TO HOLD FORMS $19.23 Invoice 6712 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training 05 -03 -10 MADDENS GULL LAKE RESORT $417.44 0649 5/20/2010 • Invoice Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds 05 -05 -10 LOWES, PATIO FURNITURE $449.48 Invoice 5721 5/20/2010 P022111 -1083- CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training 04 -07 -10 GRANDVIEW LODGE, HANSON, R. Invoice 4538 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 04 -14 -10 FREMONT INDUSTRIAL, #174 SOLENOID VALVE Invoice 5441 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair 04 -20 -10 SURE FOOT INDUSTRIES, MOP TOP, BLACK Invoice 6937 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair 04 -20 -10 NORTHERN TOOL Invoice 2924 5/20/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -208 Instructional Supplies 05 -04 -10 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING, SIMULATION SMOKE Invoice 0166 5/20/2010 PO 22059 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,684.99 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $459.00 601 WATER FUND $768.74 602 SEWER FUND $ $3,914.72 06/03/10 8:42 AM Page 2 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $3,914.72 Total $3,914.72 • *I -1084- $441.40 $246.25 $226.50 $150.11 $82.39 $3,914.72 CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 8:44 AM . Page 1 *Check Detail Register© CITY OF MOUND May 2010 10100 Wells Fargo $1,582.30 • -1085- Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Wells Fargo Paid Chk# 035078 5/26/2010 FOLEY, MIKE E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training $70.00 05 2610 04 -23 -10 EMT BASIC Total FOLEY, MIKE $70.00 Paid Chk# 035079 5/26/2010 KIVISTO, SCOTT E 602 - 49450 -438 Licenses and Taxes $11.00 05 2510 REIMBURSE LICENSE ENDORSEMENTS Total KIVISTO, SCOTT $11.00 Paid Chk# 035080 5/26/2010 MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMEN G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow $268.29 C2 4261ORCPT CENTERPOINT ENERGY REFUND I MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMEN $268.29 Paid Chk# 035081 5/26/2010 SAVAGE, MICHAEL R 281 - 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees $7.50 052610 TH03962 PWC ONLY R 281 -45210 -34735 Multiple Slip Permits $75.00 05 2610 TH03962 PWC ONLY Total SAVAGE, MICHAEL $82.50 Paid Chk# 035082 5/26/2010 SPRINT WIRELESS E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells $490.11 92 4573317 -10 04 -15 -10 THRU 05 -14 -10 CELL PHONES Total SPRINT WIRELESS $490.11 Paid Chk# 035083 5/26/2010 SPRINT WIRELESS E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells $319.92 77 2348811 -03 04 -15 -10 THRU 05 -14 -10 CELL PHONES Total SPRINT WIRELESS $319.92 Paid Chk# 035084 5/26/2010 SPRINT WIRELESS (FIRE) E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells $266.98 61 7320297 -02 04 -13 -10 THRU 05 -12 -10 CELL PHONES Total SPRINT WIRELESS (FIRE) $266.98 Paid Chk# 035085 5/26/2010 TUMBERG, HEIDI E 101 -41500 -331 Use of personal auto $15.01 05 2610 05 -19 -10 GFOA LUNCHEON Total TUMBERG, HEIDI $15.01 Paid Chk# 035086 5/26/2010 WEIST, KATHY E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense $47.37 052610 05 -19 -10 FIRE COMMISSION MEETING E 222 -42260 -331 Use of personal auto $11.12 05 2610 05 -11 -10 MILEAGE, FIRE CONTRACTS Total WEIST, KATHY $58.49 10100 Wells Fargo $1,582.30 • -1085- CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 8:44 A� Page *Check Detail Register© CITY OF MOUND May 2010 Check Amt Invoice Comment Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,093.33 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $395.47 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $82.50 602 SEWER FUND $11.00 $1,582.30 01 -1086- CITY OF MOUND 06/02/10 2:11 PM Page 1 ��► *Check Detail Register© CITY OF MOUND June 2010 -1087- Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Wells Fargo Paid Chk# 035087 6/2/2010 AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenues $26.86 06 0210 4321 WILSHIRE BLVD W/S REFUND Total AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC $26.86 Paid Chk# 035088 6/2/2010 BAYLOR BUILDING AND CABINETS G101-23007 Erosion Control Escrow $1,000.00 06 0210 2010 SHOREWOOD LANE #2009 -00654 Total BAYLOR BUILDING AND CABINETS $1,000.00 Paid Chk# 035089 6/2/2010 BIEHL, PATRICIA R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenues $22.86 06 0210 6347 RAMBLER LANE W/S REFUND Total BIEHL, PATRICIA $22.86 Paid Chk# 035090 6/2/2010 GRADY, DANIEL E 101 - 43100 -438 Licenses and Taxes $11.00 06 0210 2010 LICENSE ENDORSEMENT Total GRADY, DANIEL $11.00 Paid Chk# 035091 6/2/2010 KLATKE, BRAD R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenues $132.14 06 0210 2333 FAIRVIEW LANE W/S REFUND Total KLATKE, BRAD $132.14 Paid Chk# 035092 6/2/2010 KRAMER, KRISTOPHER G101-23220 4942 Edgewter #09 -14 Variance $522.00 06 0210 4942 EDGEWATER DRIVE #09 -14 Total KRAMER, KRISTOPHER $522.00 Paid Chk# 035093 6/2/2010 LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATION E 101 - 41115 -430 Miscellaneous $10,000.00 06 0210 MILFOIL TREATMENT Total LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATION $10,000.00 Paid Chk# 035094 6/2/2010 LINQUIST, ERIC R 281 -45210 -34725 Dock Permits $50.00 06 0210 VILLA KEY DEPOSIT REFUND Total LINQUIST, ERIC $50.00 Paid Chk# 035095 6/2/2010 MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPERATORS E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training $225.00 060210 07 -27 -10 ANNUAL CONFERENCE, HANSON, R. E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training $225.00 060210 07 -27 -10 ANNUAL CONFERENCE, STRICKLEN E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training $225.00 06 0210 07 -27 -10 ANNUAL CONFERENCE, WELCH I MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPERATORS $675.00 Y Paid Chk# 035096 6/2/2010 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION E 222 -42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib $11,466.67 06 0210 05 -10 FIRE RELIEF Total MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION $11,466.67 Paid Chk# 035097 6/2/2010 SKINNER, GREG E 101 -43100 -305 Medical Services $106.33 060210 2010 SAFETY LENS E 602 -49450 -305 Medical Services $106.34 060210 2010 SAFETY LENS E 601 -49400 -305 Medical Services $106.33 06 0210 2010 SAFETY LENS • Total SKINNER, GREG $319.00 -1087- // - I - I CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND *Check Detail Register© June 2010 06/02/10 2:11 PM Page 0 Check Amt Invoice Comment Paid Chk# 035098 6/2/2010 SPECIAL OPERATIONS TRAINING AS - E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training $140.00 060210 04 -26 -10 TACTICAL TRANING CONFERENCE, SCHOENHERR Total SPECIAL OPERATIONS TRAINING AS $140.00 Paid Chk# 035099 6/2/2010 SUSSMAN, MICHAEL E. E101-42110-434 Conference & Training $25.00 06 0210 05 -13 -101ST RESPONDER REFRESHER Total SUSSMAN, MICHAEL E. $25.00 Paid Chk# 035100 6/2/2010 TRAINING OF OFFICERS, ASSOCIAT E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training E 101 -42110 -434 Conference & Training E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training Total TRAINING OF OFFICERS, ASSOCIAT $193.33 060210 10 -19 -21 ERU TRAINING, RASMUSSEN $193.33 060210 10 -19 -21 ERU TRAINING, SCHOENHERR $193.33 060210 10 -19 -21 ERU TRAINING, HOOPER $193.34 060210 10 -19 -21 ERU TRAINING, SPENCER $193.34 060210 10 -19 -21 ERU TRAINING, NICCUM $193.33 060210 10 -19 -21 ERU TRAINING, BECK $1,160.00 Paid Chk# 035101 6/2/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS (P1W) E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells $258.16 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES • E 101 -41310 -321 Telephone & Cells $73.92 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES E 101 -43100 -321 Telephone & Cells $201.03 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES E 101 -42400 -321 Telephone & Cells $25.49 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES E 281 -45210 -321 Telephone & Cells $9.72 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES G101-22816 Personal Cell Phone $111.24 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES G101-13100 Due From Other Funds $54.64 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES G101-13100 Due From Other Funds $53.15 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells $228.59 2401657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES E 101 -45200 -321 Telephone & Cells $240.46 24 01657684 05 -14 -10 THRU 06 -13 -10 CELL PHONES Total VERIZON WIRELESS (P/W) $1,256.40 $104.17 322093300 Paid Chk# 035102 6/2/2010 WAYZATA, CITY OF E 101 - 43100 -438 Licenses and Taxes $14.50 06 0210) #404 PLATES Total WAYZATA, CITY OF $14.50 Paid Chk# 035103 6/2/2010 XCEL ENERGY E 285 -46388 -381 Electric Utilities $809.35 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 E 101 -45200 -381 Electric Utilities $52.66 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 DEPOT E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities $358.53 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 E 601 -49400 -381 Electric Utilities $2,168.52 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 E 602 -49450 -381 Electric Utilities $1,667.43 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 E 609 -49750 -381 Electric Utilities $971.47 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 E 101 -42110 -381 Electric Utilities $496.93 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 E 101 -41910 -381 Electric Utilities $659.49 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 E 101 -45200 -381 Electric Utilities $104.17 322093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 GARAGE E 222 -42260 -381 Electric Utilities $496.93 32 2093300 04 -10 #51- 6002837 -1 Total XCEL ENERGY $7,785.48 -1088- 0 fb CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary CITY OF MOUND *Check Detail Register© 06/02/10 2:11 PM Page 3 June 2010 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Wells Fargo $34,606.91 10100 Wells Fargo - 101 GENERAL FUND $15,410.54 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $11,963.60 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $59.72 285 MOUND HRA $809.35 601 WATER FUND $2,714.87 602 SEWER FUND $2,677.36 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $971.47 $34,606.91 • • -1089- CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 1 Payments • CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Batch Name 060810SUE User Dollar Amt $182,035.25 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $182,035.25 $0.00 In Balance Refer 60810 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY VETERI Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -445 Dog Kennel Fees 04 -17 -10 #10 -826 DOA DOG $112.00 Invoice 179584 6/8/2010 PO 22016 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $112.00 Refer 60810 AMUNDSON, M. LLP Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -256 Tobacco Products For R CIGARETTES $471.48 Invoice 86496 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -256 Tobacco Products For R CIGARETTES $479.09 Invoice 85883 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $950.57 Refer 60810 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. PAGER CHARGERS $82.29 Invoice 15357 6/8/2010 PO 22064 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $82.29 Refer 60810 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $249.72 Invoice 394014815 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 05 -28 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE $1.00 Invoice 394014815 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $217.92 Invoice 461014012 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 05 -20 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE $1.00 Invoice 461014012 -B 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 611/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $469.64 Refer 60810 BELLBOY CORP _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS AND SACKS $82.75 Invoice 83708500 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MERCHANDISE $69.70 Invoice 83655500 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies SACKS $25.75 Invoice 83655500 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $103.20 Invoice 83655500 -C 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,671.00 Invoice 53311200 -A. 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 05 -19 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE $38.75 Invoice 53311200 -N 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,991.15 Refer 60810 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE $44.95 Invoice 864974 618/2010 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $44.95 Refer 60810 BILL MASON CHRYSLER JEEP 01 401 -1090- 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 2 $53.33 $53.33 $53.34 Total $160.00 - $20.71 $38.08 Total $17.37 $227.88 Total $227.88 $240.00 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 60810 CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICE _ CITY OF MOUND 04 -05 -10 WATER IN BASEMENT Invoice 09009 -4 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Payments Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts HOSE CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts HOSE Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs DETAIL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR Invoice S34041 -C 6/8/2010 Invoice 213850 6/8/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs DETAIL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair Invoice 213850 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs DETAIL INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR Invoice 6974 - 120025 6/8/2010 Invoice 213850 6/8/2010 TERMINALS, WIRE, CABLE Transaction Date 5/18/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPP _ Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -220 Repair/Maint Supply RETURN DEFECTIVE Wells Fargo 10100 Invoice 900855953 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply BULBS Invoice 900799914 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 BOSS DISTRIBUTORS _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 144 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/25/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREN T _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training ARSON INVESTIGATION, MAAS • Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 PO 22075 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 2 $53.33 $53.33 $53.34 Total $160.00 - $20.71 $38.08 Total $17.37 $227.88 Total $227.88 $240.00 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 60810 CAMPION ENGINEERING SERVICE _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic 04 -05 -10 WATER IN BASEMENT Invoice 09009 -4 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 CARLSON TRACTOR AND EQUIPM _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts HOSE Invoice S34041 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts HOSE Invoice S34041 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts HOSE Invoice S34041 -C 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair GAGE, AIR CHUCK Invoice 6974 - 120587 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SWITCH BUTTON Invoice 6974 - 120025 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair TERMINALS, WIRE, CABLE Invoice 6974 - 121087 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair 05 -31 -10 FINANCE CHARGE Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 • Refer 60810 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PA49 _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #102 INNER TUBES Invoice 6974 - 124069 -A 6/8/2010 $157.50 Total $157.50 $14.48 $14.48 $14.47 Total $43.43 $53.86 $15.27 $28.43 $11.00 Total $108.56 $6.94 -1091- CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #102 INNER TUBES Invoice 6974 - 124069 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #102 INNER TUBES Invoice 6974 - 124069 -C 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RETURN PLASTIC LEVER PUMP Invoice 6974 - 123377 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RETURN PLASTIC LEVER PUMP Invoice 6974 - 123377 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RETURN PLASTIC LEVER PUMP Invoice 6974 - 123377 -C 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #848 CERAMIC BRAKE PAD Invoice 6974 - 123728 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #853 OIL FILTER Invoice 6974 - 123828 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #905 OIL FILTER Invoice 6974 - 123348 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #905 OIL FILTER Invoice 6974 - 123348 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #905 OIL FILTER Invoice 6974 - 123348 -C 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #905 OIL FILTER Invoice 6974 - 123348 -D 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #905 OIL FILTER Invoice 6974 - 123348 -E 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #404 CORE RETURN Invoice 6974 - 122979 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/27/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 CEMSTONE CONCRETE SOLUTIO 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 3 $6.94 $6.94 - $31.02 - $31.02 - $31.02 $317.70 $4.48 $1.33 $1.06 $1.06 $1.06 $0.80 - $84.43 Total $170.82 • • Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -221 Equipment Parts U -CART $42.75 Invoice 966782 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -221 Equipment Parts 3000 PSI 3/4 FLY $113.29 Invoice 966783 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $156.04 Refer 60810 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5714383 $441.00 Invoice 060810 618/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5728173 $531.10 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5731601 $97.18 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5731601 $97.18 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5731601 $97.19 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5762358 $78.03 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 • Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5765631 $209.46 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 -1092- 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 4 $209.47 $81.95 Total $1,842.56 $4.49 $4.49 $4.49 Total $13.47 $40.00 Total $40.00 $212.88 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total CITY OF MOUND Refer 60810 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST _ Transaction Date 5/25/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $471.20 Payments Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 60949750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa CREDIT —MIX Invoice 5171087 -A 6/8/2010 CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 5171087 -B 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Current Period: June 2010 Total Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #5765631 _ Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 4801 ISLAND VIEW RIP RAP Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -383 Gas Utilities 03 -18 -10 THRU 04 -15 -10 #6093897 Project PW0902 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Transaction Date 5/18/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 _ Refer 60810 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER Invoice 77842 6/8/2010 Invoice 30564 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER Invoice 30564 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER Invoice 30564 -C 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 CLERK/FINANCE MUNICIPAL ASS Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 07 -01 -10 THRU 06 -30 -11 MEMBERSHIP DUES, RITTER Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 COAST TO COAST SOLUTIONS _ Payment E222-42260-217 Fire Prevention Supplies LOLLIPOPS • Cash ' Invoice IVC0025328 6/8/2010 PO 22048 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 4 $209.47 $81.95 Total $1,842.56 $4.49 $4.49 $4.49 Total $13.47 $40.00 Total $40.00 $212.88 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $212.88 Refer 60810 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST _ Transaction Date 5/25/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $471.20 Invoice 0148120819 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 60949750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa CREDIT —MIX Invoice 5171087 -A 6/8/2010 - $24.30 Invoice 0148120820 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 5171087 -B 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $446.90 Refer 60810 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING _ Refer 60810 DAVIS MECHAN SYSTEMS _ Cash Payment E 401 -43109 -500 Capital Outlay FA 4801 ISLAND VIEW RIP RAP $2,405.00 Invoice 0810 6/8/2010 Project PW0902 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,405.00 Refer 60810 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $169.00 Invoice 77842 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $243.00 Total $412.00 $161.14 $20.40 Total $181.54 -1093- Invoice 80094 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/25/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 DANIMAL DISTRIBUTING, INCORP _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 5171087 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 5171087 -B 6/8/2010 • Invoice Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 DAVIS MECHAN SYSTEMS _ Total $412.00 $161.14 $20.40 Total $181.54 -1093- CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance Invoice 10097 -A 6/8/2010 PO 22074 Cash Payment E 22242260402 Building Maintenance Invoice 10097 -B 6/8/2010 PO 22074 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Refer 60810 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 04 -23 -10 HVAC MAINTENANCE 04 -23 -10 HVAC MAINTENANCE 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 5 $523.00 $523.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,046.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,944.90 Invoice 553590 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 05 -17 -10 UNIFORMS Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 05 -17 -10 MATS $20.95 Invoice 553591 -A 6/8/2010 05 -17 -10 MATS Invoice 6394910 -E 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.90 Invoice 553591 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $176.00 Invoice 554241 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $148.00 Invoice 553025 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,047.00 Invoice 552621 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,380.75 Refer 60810 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -329 Sirens /Phone Linesl 07 -01 -10 THRU 12 -31 -10 SIREN $683.10 MAINTENANCE Invoice 32459 6/8/2010 PO 22009 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $683.10 Refer 60810 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #508 MOUNT FIREBOLT BEACON $54.50 Invoice CS051310 -1 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.50 Refer 60810 FRANK MADDEN AND ASSOCIATE Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Refer 60810 G & K SERVICES 04 -10 LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 05 -17 -10 UNIFORMS Invoice 6394910 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 05 -17 -10 UNIFORMS Invoice 6394910 -13 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 05 -17 -10 UNIFORMS Invoice 6394910 -C 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials 05 -17 -10 MATS Invoice 6394910 -D 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -230 Shop Materials 05 -17 -10 MATS Invoice 6394910 -E 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials 05 -17 -10 MATS Invoice 6394910 -F 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services 05 -17 -10 MATS Invoice 6494913 6/8/2010 $22.80 Total $22.80 $19.08 $20.68 $25.75 $48.82 0 � 0 1 $48.82 $48.82 • $73.40 -1094- � 0 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 05 -24 -10 UNIFORMS Invoice 6405935 -A 6/8/2010 Refer 60810 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies 05 -24 -10 MATS Invoice 6405935 -B 6/8/2010 E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services 05 -24 -10 MATS Invoice 6405931 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services 05 -31 -10 MATS Invoice 6417030 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -460 Janitorial Services 05 -17 -10 MATS Invoice 6394914 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 05 -17 -10 UNIFORMS Invoice 6394915 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies 05 -17 -10 MATS Invoice 6394915 -B 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 r Refer 60810 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE LIQUOR Cash Payment E 10143100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs INSPECTION BOOKS Invoice 10753 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400404 Machinery/Equip Repairs INSPECTION BOOKS, #508 GUNITE Invoice 10753 -B 6/8/2010 Invoice 402561 • ! Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs INSPECTION BOOKS, #1604 PIGGY PACK Invoice 10753 -C 6/8/2010 E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 T Refer 60810 GILLESPIE CENTER _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41115430 Miscellaneous 2010 ENDOWMENT, FIRST HALF Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/2712010 Wells Fargo 10100 T Refer 60810 GRAND PERE WINES, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 24850 6/8/2010 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 6 $15.98 $62.75 $51.60 $145.02 $52.06 $19.25 $67.07 otal $699.10 $5.56 $93.33 $68.10 otal $166.99 $30,000.00 otal $30,000.00 $80.00 $80.00 $79.90 $999.05 $6,537.05 $79.20 $208.95 $1,498.10 $39.95 $45.42 -1095- Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 60810 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 405831 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 405830 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 405829 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 405526 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 405453 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 402561 6/8/2010 • Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 402560 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 402559 6/8/2010 $80.00 $79.90 $999.05 $6,537.05 $79.20 $208.95 $1,498.10 $39.95 $45.42 -1095- CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 402558 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 400289 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Refer 60810 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 1379044 6/8/2010 PO 22027 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 13388182 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Refer 60810 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _ LIQUOR LIQUOR 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 7 $2,545.86 $680.91 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,714.39 COUPLINGS, PLUGS $166.10 CLAMP $111.75 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $277.85 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals 04 -10 RADIO LEASE Invoice 20048035 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 523287 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 521786 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs 04 -10 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Invoice 006 - 020 -18 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs 04 -10 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING Invoice 007 - 001 -24 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment G 101 -23225 2270 Langdon Lane Variance 04 -10 2270 LANGDON LANE Invoice 007 - 001 -24 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment G 101 -23201 AT &T Tower, 5600 Lynwood 04 -10 VBTB CELL TOWER LYNWOOE Invoice 007 - 005 -27 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment G 101 -23223 4309 Wilshire Blvd #10 -01 P 04 -10 4309 WILSHIRE BLVD #10 -11 Invoice 007 - 005 -27 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment G 101 -23227 5248 Sulgrove Rd #10- 03/04/ 04 -10 5248 SULGROVE ROAD #10 -01 Invoice 007 - 005 -27 -C 6/8/2010 Cash Payment G 101 -23231 6301 Lynwood #10 -07, Wood 04 -10 6301 LYNWOOD BLVD #10 -07 Invoice 007 - 005 -17 -D 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -300 Professional Srvs 04 -10 STREETSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONSULT Invoice 007 - 024 -21 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies HARDWARE Invoice 1135211 6/8/2010 PO 22077 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 INTRCOMM TECHNOLOGY _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic 06 -10 UTILITY SERVICE Invoice 121160 6/8/2010 $805.52 Total $805.52 $294.12 $230.00 Total $524.12 $100.00 $228.25 $20.75 $291.50 $533.75 $606.75 $189.25 $154.00 • *I Total $2,124.25 $64.32 Total .` $64.32 • $1,800.00 -1096- � 0 CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Refer 60810 J.R.'S APPLIANCE DISPOSAL, INC _ Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 71299 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Refer 60810 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -350 Printing Invoice 22369 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Refer 60810 JOHN DEERE GOVERNMENT /NATI _ Cash Payment E 401 -43109 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 54296500 6/8/2010 PO 22116 Cash Payment E 401 -43109 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 54513910 6/8/2010 PO 22116 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Refer 60810 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 8 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,800.00 05 -08 -10 RECYCLE DAY 6/8/2010 $1,805.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,805.00 SUMMER NEWSLETTER -$7.50 $1,253.64 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,253.64 HOSE, BASE, SPRINKLER E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale $953.49 $466.92 Project PWO901 6/8/2010 OUTDOOR CONTROL Transaction Date $519.84 E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Project PWO901 $1,645.20 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,473.33 I Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,439.95 Invoice 1837208 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $59.85 •' Invoice 1837209 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT — LIQUOR -$7.50 Invoice 458689 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 475 -46386 -300 Professional Srvs Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $466.92 Invoice 1837210 6/8/2010 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,645.20 Invoice 1841372 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $4,142.15 Invoice 1841373 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $691.35 Invoice 1837207 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT —WINE - $765.00 Invoice 458918 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 051910 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Refer 60810 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN SKINNER RETIREMENT Total $7,672.92 $154.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $154.00 04 -10 MISCELLANEOUS BILLABLE $121.00 04 -10 EXTENSION OF DISTRICT $49.00 04 -10 AUDITORS ROAD LAND PURCHASE, $98.00 PERBIX 10100 Total $268.00 Wells Fargo -1097- Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 95823 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 475 -46386 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 95823 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 475 -46386 -300 Professional Srvs . Invoice 95823 -C 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 R efer 60810 LAKESHORE WEEKLY COMMUNIC 10100 Total $268.00 Wells Fargo -1097- CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -351 Legal Notices Publishing AUCTION AD Invoice 122663 6/8/2010 PO 22008 E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SWIVEL CRIMP FITTING Invoice 9238635 6/8/2010 Cash Payment Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -434 Conference & Training 2010 ANNUAL CONFERENCE Invoice 142372 6/8/2010 PO 22525 Cash Payment Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -202 Duplicating and copying 04 -14 -10 THRU 05 -13 -10 BNV Invoice 1123749 -A 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -202 Duplicating and copying 04 -14 -10 THRU 05 -13 -10 COLOR Invoice 1123749 -B 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 MARK Vll DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 612696 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 612697 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 612698 618/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 612695 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 609568 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 609569 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 23740 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 23763 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 23773 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 23797 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Refer 60810 METRO FIRE Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -219 Safety supplies ICM 2000 REFURBISHED Invoice 37910 6/8/2010 PO 22076 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Refer 60810 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTY M ANA 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 9 $120.00 Total $120.00 $26.64 Total $26.64 $100.00 Total $100.00 $115.68 $25.19 Total $140.87 $11,786.82 $184.00 $64.50 $0.03 $1,944.35 $110.00 Total $14,089.70 $10.40 $287.30 $15.60 $309.40 Total $622.70 $88.38 Total $88.38 7 10:1 01 05 -03 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE 05 -06 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE 05 -10 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE 05 -13 -10 DELIVERY CHARGEQ Wells Fargo 10100 Wells Fargo 10100 -1098- CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 10 Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 MEMBERSHIP DUES $118.48 Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $118.48 Refer 60810 MINNESOTA DEPT PUBLIC SAFET Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -400 Repairs & Maintenance CJDN CONNECT CHARGE $630.00 Invoice P07MD02713000 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.00 Refer 60810 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples COLIFORM, MF - WATER $77.50 Invoice 497114 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.50 Refer 60810 MNSPECT Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -308 Building Inspection Fees 04 -10 FIRE INSPECTIONS $682.50 Invoice 3537 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $682.50 Refer 60810 MORRELL ENTERPRISES, LP Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -460 Janitorial Services 05 -08 -10 RECYCLE DAY $2,435.15 Invoice 19998 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 _ Refer 60810 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,435.15 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic 06 -10 MUSIC SERVICE $102.73 Invoice A373407 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $102.73 Refer 60810 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials VINLY WORKING SIGNS $554.50 Invoice TI- 0221786 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM TOPS $258.53 Invoice TI- 022151 1 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM TOPS $258.53 Invoice TI- 0221511 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM TOPS $258.53 Invoice TI- 0221511 -C 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,330.09 Refer 60810 NS11 MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 08 -31 -10 MAINTENANCE $1,100.00 AGREEMENT Invoice C001223 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,100.00 Refer 60810 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 518968901001 6/8/2010 PO 22190 Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 519497374001 -A 6/8/2010 PO 22524 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 519497374001 -B 6/8/2010 PO 22524 PAPER, LABELS, TABS $67.60 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $7.83 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $22.18 -1099- -� CITY OF MOUND E \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Invoice 519497374001 -C 6/8/2010 PO 22524 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Invoice 519497374001 -D 6/8/2010 PO 22524 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Invoice 519497374001 -E 6/8/2010 PO 22524 Refer 60810 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Invoice 519497374001 -F 6/8/2010 PO 22524 CREDIT —WINE Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Invoice 519497374001 -G 6/8/2010 P022524 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Invoice 519497374001 -H 6/8/2010 PO 22524 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES Invoice 519497374001 -1 6/8/2010 PO 22524 LIQUOR Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -200 Office Supplies USB DRIVE, CLIPBOARD, POST -ITS Invoice 519128055001 6/8/2010 P022004 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -200 Office Supplies PAD REFILLS, SHELF Invoice 518744231001 6/8/2010 PO 22072 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/27/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8261371 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 05 -24 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 8261371 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8260657 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight 05 -17 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 8260657 -B 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 60239702 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 58915356 -B 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo Refer 60810 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT —WINE Invoice 3436532 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT —WINE Invoice 3437620 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2912059 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2912060 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2915256 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2915257 6/8/2010 10100 Total Total Total 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 11 $30.00 $16.96 $13.05 $9.13 $7.82 $11.74 $11.74 $97.67 $19.54 0 � $481.00 $7.00 $533.61 $12.50 $1,034.11 $144.05 - $85.72 -$8.67 - $10.35 $3,624.00 $441.40 $1,150.50 • $88.30 -1100- CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 12 Payments • CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Transaction Date 5/25/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,285.18 Refer 60810 POSITRON PUBLIC SAFETY SYST Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -400 Repairs & Maintenance PC2010 PC INFORS PLATINUM SUPPOERT $3,600.00 Invoice 2844 6/8/2010 PO 22014 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,600.00 Refer 60810 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $933.69 Invoice 310796 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $9,550.48 Invoice 310797 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $96.00 Invoice 307693 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,101.71 Invoice 307799 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,681.88 Refer 60810 RANDY'S SANITATION _ Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -460 Janitorial Services 05 -08 -10 RECYCE DAY SHREDDER $208.73 Invoice 1413254 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $208.73 •' Refer 60810 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair TRACTOR LOW VIS GAL $81.12 Invoice 02- 2020535 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $81.12 Refer 60810 SETS DESIGN INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -218 Clothing and Uniforms SWEATSHIRT WITH LOGO $30.00 Invoice 10586 6/8/2010 PO 22007 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 60810 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORATI Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft COMPUTER WITH SOFTWARE $344.14 Invoice 800067398 -A 6/8/2010 PO 22658 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft COMPUTER WITH SOFTWARE $344.14 Invoice 600067398 -B 6/8/2010 PO 22658 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $688.28 Refer 60810 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER COMP Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 SPRINKLER INSP, $1,187.65 EXTG MAINT Invoice 73605749 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 SPRINKLER INSP, $830.55 EXTG MAINT Invoice 73605746 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 SRPINKLER INSPC, $1,036.38 EXTG MAINT Invoice 73605750 -A 6/8/2010 PO 22078 • Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 SPRINKLER INSP, $1,036.37 EXTG MAINT Invoice 73605750 -B 6/8/2010 PO 22078 -1101- CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 9:12 AM 05 -15 -10 WATER REPORT Page 13 Payments • CITY OF MOUND 6/1/2010 Current Period: June 2010 Refer 6_0 810 Cash Payment E 10143100440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 SPRINKLER $282.18 INSPEC, EXTG MAINT E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 73605748 -A 6/8/2010 Invoice 1391430 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 60149400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 SPRINKLER INSP, $282.18 EXTG MAINT Invoice 1391430 -B 6/8/2010 Invoice 73605748 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 60249450440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 SPRINKLER INSP, $282.19 EXTG MAINT 6/8/2010 Invoice 73605748 -C 6/8/2010 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 10145200440 Other Contractual Servic 05 -01 -10 THRU 04 -30 -11 EXTG MAINT $80.00 Invoice 73605747 6/8/2010 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,017.50 Refer 60810 SOUTHWEST TRAILS ASSOCIATIO _ Invoice 1391458 Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow R29 DNR R3 ST PAUL OFFICE $3,084.24 Invoice EF00004658687 6/8/2010 E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,084.24 Refer 60810 SUN PAT NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing 05 -15 -10 WATER REPORT Invoice 989253 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 6_0 810 TAYLOR, J.J. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1391430 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 60949750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Invoice 1391430 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1379937 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1391429 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1391458 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1379972 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1019182 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1391450 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1378990 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1379898 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 592263 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 592763 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 592762 6/8/2010 Total Total $404.25 $25.60 $40.00 $691.00 $8,489.05 $118.80 $882.65 $19.14 $4,926.75 $3,382.85 $323.00 $18,898.84 $109.15 $11,129.95 $0.00 01 *I -1102- CITY OF MOUND 06/03/10 9:12 AM • Payments Page 14 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $224.45 Invoice 592761 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale CREDIT —BEER - $10.00 Invoice 770715 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $686.00 Invoice 771051 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,223.95 Invoice 593749 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $191.50 Invoice 593747 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $0.00 Invoice 593748 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $125.35 Invoice 591727 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale CREDIT —BEER - $270.00 Invoice 591730 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,161.10 Invoice 591729 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22,571.45 Refer 60810 TONKA PLUMBING HEATING & CL _ Payment E 60149400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 1601 PARADISE LANE, METER $250.00 • Cash '` INSTALLATION Invoice 4007 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 60810 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies REGISTER TAPE $432.90 Invoice 25442 6/8/2010 PO 22674 Cash Payment E60949750-210 Operating Supplies SOFTWARE UPDATE $372.99 Invoice 25451 6/8/2010 PO 22242 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $805.89 Refer 60810 TRUAX, TODD _ Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic INTRCOM MEETING $75.00 Invoice 10 -00032 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/112010 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $75.00 Refer 60810 TRUE VALUE, MOUND _ Cash Payment E 22242260 -210 Operating Supplies PORCH AND FLOOR $81.29 Invoice 69635 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies BRUSH SET, DROP CLOTH $20.66 Invoice 69649 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies PORCH AND FLOOR $94.09 Invoice 69753 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $90.26 Invoice 69892 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies BOLT CUTTER $36.33 69981 6/8/2010 • Invoice Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies COVER, BRUSH $5.64 Invoice 69964 6/8/2010 -1103- CITY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70170 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70184 6/812010 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70392 -A 6/812010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70392 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70376 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70383 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70472 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70463 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70593 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 22242260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 70660 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Refer 60810 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS RETURN BOLT CUTTER, BOLT CUTTER SALT PELLETS SALT PELLETS SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS PRIM WIRE, BRACKET RUBBER MALLET CONNECTOR BALL VALVE, TAPE Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -218 Clothing and Uniforms PATCH ON UNIFORM, SUSSMAN Invoice 34494 618/2010 PO 22018 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 V & S JEWELERS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -430 Miscellaneous SKINNER CLOCK Invoice 060810 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/24/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LOC 90 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals AIR AND OXYGEN Invoice 891239 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 5/28/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 26151 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight 05 -19 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 26151 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 26152 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WACONIA FORD MERCURY Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #209 MOULDIN Invoice 56758 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #209 MOULDIN Invoice 56758 -B 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #209 MOULDIN Invoice 56758 -C 6/8/2010 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 15 $30.44 -$6.41 $470.65 $470.64 $0.96 $0.86 $13.68 $8.54 $3.73 $14.18 Total $1,335.54 $59.85 Total $59.85 $83.36 Total $83.36 $42.97 Total $42.97 $208.00 $5.00 $112.00 Total $325.00 $11.85 $11.85 $11.84 7 *I -1104- � 0 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2010 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #845 DISABLE FLASHING LIGHTS Invoice FOCS44101 6/8/2010 P022011 Total Transaction Date 5/27/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WANDERING EPICUREAN, THE _ Total Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2988 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WESTONKA MECHANICAL CONTR Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic 6348 LYNWOOD INSTALL METER Invoice 34167 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE AND Total Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs VALVE STEMS Invoice 638836 -A 6/8/2010 - $45.50 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs #508 VALVE STEM Invoice 638836 -B 6/8/2010 Total Transaction Date 611/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Total Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 05 -13 -10 GRANDVIEW FORCE MAIN • Invoice 2804 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/112010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 234709 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight 05 -27 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE Invoice 234709 -B 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/2/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale CREDIT —WINE Invoice 48444 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 318298 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 WINE NEWS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R PUBLICATION Invoice 579927 6/8/2010 Transaction Date 6/1/2010 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60810 Z WINES USA LLC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 9534 -A 6/8/2010 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 9534 -B 6/8/2010 • Transaction Date 6/1/2010 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 16 $39.95 Total $75.49 $234.00 Total $234.00 $81.50 Total $81.50 $16.09 $5.37 Total $21.46 $385.00 Total $385.00 $288.00 $8.40 Total $296.40 - $45.50 $690.90 Total $645.40 $14.85 Total $14.85 $120.00 $2.50 Total $122.50 WINE 05 -20 -10 DELIVERY CHARGE Wells Fargo 10100 -1105- CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND� Current Period: June 2010 Fund Summary 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 17 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $182,035.25 Total $182,035.25 • • • -1106- 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $52,389.60 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $5,099.04 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $344.14 285 MOUND HRA $984.55 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $3,878.33 475 TIF 1 -3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $147.00 601 WATER FUND $2,024.56 602 SEWER FUND $1,238.44 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $111,479.91 670 RECYCLING FUND $4,448.88 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $0.8 $182,035.25 06/03/10 9:12 AM Page 17 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $182,035.25 Total $182,035.25 • • • -1106- CITY OF MOUND • RESOLUTION NO. 10 -_ RESOLUTION APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes 203B.121 states that the governing body of a municipality with responsibility to accept and reject absentee ballots must, by ordinance or resolution, establish a ballot board consisting of a sufficient number of election judges trained in the handling of absentee ballots; and WHEREAS, the ballot board may include staff trained as election judges, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby appoints an Absentee Ballot Board as provided in Minnesota State Statutes 20313121. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it has been determined, based on the number of absentee ballots cast in the primary and general elections of 2008, that four members, from different major political parties, is a sufficient number for the absentee ballot board, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the members of the Absentee Ballot Board for the primary and general election are hereby named as Bonnie Ritter, Sue Schwalbe, Jodi Rahn, and Jill Norlander. Adopted by the City Council this 8 day of June, 2010. 0 Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -1107- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD • MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 May 24, 2010 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council Members FROM: Jim Fackler, Park REF: Rip Rap Quote for 4857 & 4853 Island Mew Drive At the DCC meeting May 20, 2010 they passed a Motion for a rip rap project as noted below; MOTION by Osmek to approve rip rapping of 90 lineal feet of shoreline at 4857 and 4853 Island View Drive with Lake Minnetonka Portable Dredge as the contractor. SECOND by Gardner. MOTION carries unanimously. Staff was asked by the DCC at their April 15, 2010 meeting to gain quotes for possible rip rap application to be paid for out of the Dock Fund. for 90 Lnft of Devon Commons at 4857 Island View Drive and 40 Lnft at 4853 Island View Drive. Quotes Received: 1) Minnetonka Portable Dredge .............. $ 85.00 per foot 2) Concept Landscaping ......................... $ 89.00 per foot 3) Dock & Lift ..... ............................... $125.00 per foot Cost per location assuming the CC takes the lowest quote: 4857 IVD ..................... $ 7,650.00 4853 IVD ..................... $ 3,400.00 Total = $11,050.00 Work would not happen until after June 30, 2010 due to regulations from the DNR not allowing any lake bottom disruption during fish spawning. • printed on recycled paper -1108- X53 - J"�� "4 '.� . T 1 � .. ,. �� ��� �� y � � ;: � �. _ ; ;F.- � - � t � ^ � 1 y � , _ ��� I �' �a .'� �,; � � i � .. .. t _ ' _ s F f � , t z - �� � � t S r" ; � .. .. k � '��_ f a ! � � 4 '_ - - � � �,� �R Ys �t _ - ` � ' i - s' � � �� �# � 1 �� � � t t � � � ` - . � � �� � � }` �� ,. i 4 �� ' _ _ ... _ - " �. t �.# 1 ;� ; .'f � - t 1 _ � � 4 � ��� � � � �.,� -- � � t ., � � `: ., .. /�; o ;��� t ,;� � � � �: i � �• ter: � � ,� • ' , ,�� � e �, ...: \ V J ' rF �� � .. fr 1, ++ ' I I i 7 .. �� .— ,`43 E - .�1 -' - , 1 � � iA' d �`�� ��. _... _ a '. _ � � ___ ti= t �1 + 1 `x. 4 X i?r � � � � �� .. Y s i r � � 3 s s o r � r i, . F s m t . t _ _ e �rs r b a � i ; l � IN � a �� t ; 4 �'. e �, t �ti }. n �` �' A i � ��s � , C� _ � ��'� �. t r k �? � < � , r _i ,. � b ry i _ � � �e ' a + tt �. Y � � �� ���� '.� � ��� y---- � , � _ r �� � � � "'� a� ,, r x: ?' ,. � � � _ �4_�Z , � � � .� n� i ce ; �s -. '"^. . -s � �. �� � i S `� .. � } � � ! w �'' T °? y ` ; t �. s ... , _. � , ._ .t .r .. � , a .. ..f _ -. > 8 ,� � _ . � -�� � . ;� � i j (/ t l .. !I � .� � F �' r z I � _ � i Ir _ _. _ y. - , .. � -, � . G ' ! / 1' t i �,� _ 4 � t � � £ x .. � 4 x � a . _ > - ' � �, �'� x -'/ t a I a, Ak 0 y k 'A a IA t t s i {. rr In * i �v t t � , v Y • 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD CITY i ®F MOUND MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com DATE: May 27, 2010 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bonnie Ritter SUBJECT: Liquor License Renewals The following liquor licenses renewals have been received for approval. License year is July 1St through June 30 Please consider approval contingent upon receipt of all required forms, fees and certificates of insurance. Thank -you. On -Sale Liquor ($5.000 /yr fee) Al & Alma's Supper Club Corp. The Dailey Group, Inc. (dba Dailey's Pub and Carbone's Pizzeria) is Sunday On -Sale Liquor ($200 /yr fee) AI & Alma's Super Club Corp. The Dailey Group, Inc. (dba Dailey's Pub and Carbone's Pizzeria) American Legion Post 398 Club On -Sale Liquor ($500 /yr fee) American Legion Post 398 Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Beverages ($150 /yr fee) PDQ Food Stores, Inc. Speedway SuperAmerica • printed on recycled paper -1117- MOUND POLICE 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Telephone (952) 472 -0621 • � s Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch (763) 525 -6210 Fax (952) 472 -0656 JAMES E. KURTZ Chief of Police EMERGENCY 911 REF: Liquor License Background Checks DATE: June 1, 2010 Al & Alma's Supper Club No liquor violations were found in 2009 by the Mound Police Department American Legion Minnetonka Post 398 No liquor violations were found in 2009 by the Mound Police Department PDQ Food Stores, Inc. No liquor violations were found in 2009 by the Mound Police Department Dailey's Pub & Carbon's Pizzeria - Dailey's Pub — We had 19 calls in 2009 to Dailey's Pub 1 Warrant Arrest 3 Disturbing the Peace/Dis. Conduct 4 Assault 5 Medicals (4 were alcohol related) 5 Misc. Calls 1 Theft Carbone's Pizzeria We had 3 calls to Carbon's Pizzeria 2 Medicals — Alcohol Related 1 West Metro Drug Task Force Search Warrant stemming from a complaint of employees selling marijuana out of the Pizzeria. 1 employee charged with Poss. of Drug Paraphernalia 1 employee charged with Poss. of Drug Paraphernalia and Poss. of Small Amount of Marijuana No 'ng illegal was located at Carbon's Pizza Shirl y Hawks, drain. Assistant Mound Police Department • • -1118- • • 0 Minnesota Department of Public Safety l'tip Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement F o , 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222 St. Paul, MN 55101 651- 201 -7507 • TTY 651 -282 -6555 • Fax 651- 297 -5259 N RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, NINE CLUE OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID C ard fee is recei by MN Liquor C ontrol • ( 3.2% License exempt) Licensee Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code License Period Ending City /County where license approved. f 11-1 �- Al ma' _. `::u� - ,et Club Cot - Licensee Name A & Sup pet P Trade Name A l , A 1 Licensed Location address 5201 Piper Rd City, State, Zip Code Business Phone LICENSE FEES Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ 0. � � ���i �k� 200. 00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city /township /county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attache -liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city /county where license is is ed. $100,0® cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil ity. (3.2% liquor icense ar �x ales are I ban $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). 3 8 /5 - , -5' 1/r is (Signature certifies all ab6 informat' to be correct and license has been approved by city/county.) Date City Clerk/County Auditor Si (Signature certifies that renewaS a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature Date County Board issued licenses only tgnature cSrti Ws licensee is eligible for license). Police/Sher ff Signature Date -� -�v (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093 -10 -1119- Indicate below changes of corporate officers, partners, home addresses or telephone numbers: Indicate below any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in other liquor establishments: Report below details of liquor law violations (civil or criminal) that have occurred within the last five years (Dates, offenses fines or other penalties, including Liquor Control Penalties): Report below details involving any license rejections or revocations: City /County Comments: -1120- • • Minnesota Department of Public Safety r Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement F w A 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222"" ?. St. Paul, MN 551011: 651- 201 -7507. TTY 651- 282 -6555 • Fax 651- 297 -5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, NINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN Liquor Control • (3.2% Licenses exempt) Licensee Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. !• {IiWI_.�' N' S ,i 3CA, /201k 1158 License Code License Period Ending City /County where license approved. Licensee Name t -) iri L. E ' g Trade Name Minnetonka. Post Licensed Location address =:33 WiIsh B1.vd City, State, Zip Code _ FL 4 Business Phone roc -.. 7 . -, ,.,,r�582 H' - � I.. �.) J L LICENSE FEES Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ 0. U11 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city /township /county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city /county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil- ity. (3.2% liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). tea — (0�0qa Licensee Signature DOB i SS# (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city /county.) City Clerk /County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Signature Date County Board issued licenses onl ignatur2certiA fi icensee is eligible for license). Police/She ff Signature Date l (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093 -10 -1121- Indicate below changes of corporate officers, partners, home addresses or telephone numbers: Indicate below any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in other liquor establishments: Report below details of liquor law violations (civil or criminal) that have occurred within the last five years. (Dates, offenses, fines or other penalties, including Liquor Control Penalties): Report below details involving any license rejections or revocations: City /County Comments: -1122- Minnesota Department of Public Safety;, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222 St. Paul, MN 55101 :+ 651 -201 -7507 • TTY 651- 282 -6555 • Fax 651- 297 -5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN Liquor Control • (3.2% Licenses exempt) Licensee Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code `` Lic nse Period Ending 6 ' 1 30 ` 0 1. Y D# i. 1 E382 r r� City /County where license approved. i..t n FA Licensee Name P D O Food Stores I n c Trade Name PDO Licensed Location address 5550 Three Pointci City, State, Zip Code M o und, MN 55364 Business Phone LICENSE FEES Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ LA. OCA By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township /county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil- ity. (3.2% liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). 1/30/58 eeA96 56 8818narP -4� (Signature certifiN*F6oA 1' 1ffO;Ri'bn fAPcorrect and license has been approved by city/county.) City Cl .r_ g k/C aunty A ur#� itor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Board issued license,s.ox(l) (, Signature cues licensee is eligible for license). • i C2 � —/' (Signature certifies licensee or associat have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093 -10 -1123- Indicate below changes of corporate officers, partners, home addresses or telephone numbers: Indicate below any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in other liquor establishments: Deport below details of liquor law violations (civil or criminal) that have occurred within the last five years. (Dates, offenses, fines or other penalties, including Liquor Control Penalties): Report below details involving any license rejections or revocations: City /County Comments: -1124- • Minnesota Department of Public Safety � Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement � a ., 444 Cedar Street, Suite 222 a.• _ 2 St. Paul, MN 55101 1� G 651- 201 -7507 • TTY 651- 282 -6555 • Fax 651- 297 -5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN Liquor Control • (3.2% Licenses exempt) Licensee Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. I:Jtllcc 6 /'30/201 City /County where license approved. 111 a License Code —License Period Ending u n � Licensee Name he Dailey f3roup Inc. Trade Name Mai,le;:' s F' +ih & Ca.rbonN' s Piz z et i.ia Licensed Location address City, State, Zip Code • Business Phone LICENSE FEES Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ ICI, 127114) L 000. 12 2 00. 00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township /county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city /county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil- (Signature certifies (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) • County Board issued licenses 21.51 - 215 Comffiey -ce Blvd licensee is eligible for license). Police /Sheriff Sigrlat>>*P� /j /G�Gf� / ✓G�Gf/7�— Date /o — / '/ Cl _ (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. �7 PS 9093 -10 -1125- Indicate below changes of corporate officers, partners, home addresses or telephone numbers: ` Indicate below any interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in other liquor establishments: Report below details of liquor law violations (civil or criminal) that have occurred within the last five years. (Dates, offenses, fines or other penalties, incl L Control Penalties): - 0/ - o / /1 -U S 6 / f1/z e a . A a&&dZ4 g�� 4 Report below details involving any license rejections or revocations: City /County Comments: -1126- BU L=(=>N & NA B N K Consulting Engineers & Surveyors • " 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton - menk.com June 2, 2010 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2009 Street, Utility and Lift Station Improvement Project City Project Nos. PW- 09 -01, 09 -02, 09 -04, 09 -06 Pay Request No. 8 Dear Ms. Hanson: 1 NC® Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 8 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work completed on the 2009 Street, Utility and Lift Station Improvement Project from December 26, 2009 through May 28, 2010. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $27,798.40 to GMH Asphalt Corporation. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance • FAMOUMC 12100303\Pay Estimates \Ltr of Recdn, Pay Request Tdoc DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer -1127- DATE: 6/2/2010 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 8 CONTRACTOR GMH Asphalt Corp. 2009 STREET IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound CITY PROJECT NOS. PW- 09 -01, 09 -02, 09 -04, 09 -06 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk BMI PROJECT NO. C12.100303, C12.40420, 012.100481 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 12/25/2009 THROUGH 5/28/2010 TOTALAMOUNT BID ..................................................................................................................... ............................... $ 4,384,788.34 APPROVEDCHANGE ORDERS .............................................................................. ............................... $ - CURRENTCONTRACT AMOUNT ............................................................................ ............................... $ 4,384,788.34 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE ......................................................................................... ............................... $ 4,329,897.28 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE ................................................................. ............................... _ DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED .............................. ............................... $ _ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS ................................................................ ............................... $ 4,329,897.28 RETAINED PERCENTAGE { 5% ) ................ ........................................................... ............................... $ 216,494.86 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS ............................................................................ ............................... $ NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE ........................................................................ ............................... $ 4,113,402.41 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES... ........... .................... ................ .............................................. $ 4,085,604.01 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 8 ..................................................................................... ............................... $ 27,798.40 Certificate for Payment 1 hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: GMH Asphalt Corporation 9180 Lake Town Road Chaska, MN 55318 By Name Title Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 B yf� - — PROJECT ENGINEER Daniel L. aulkner Date APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner. CITY OF MOUND By Name Title Date • • • -1128- 5341 Maywood Road • Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: June 3, 2010 Re: Amendment to Approved Specific Sign Program for Auditor's Road WayFinding Signage Program Background At its December 8, 2010 meeting, the City Council approved a Specific Sign Program for installation of wayfinding signage in Auditor's Road as provided by City Code Chapter 119 -5 (10) which the City allows for areas within a Redevelopment Plan In summary, the signage included an entrance monument, a number of directory kiosks and regulatory signage. Discussion • The preliminary site plan included installation of the entrance monument in the median of Auditor's Road. However, this site is not feasible due to field • ' obstructions. Therefore, a new location is recommended which is near the east end of the Auditor's Road site in and around the former location of the Welsh Company marketing sign which was recently removed. Members are advised that Staffs memorandum dated December 8, 2009, included mention that the proposed sign locations could be subject to sight distances, review by Staff /consultants and /or public agencies and field obstructions. • It is Staffs intention to place the sign in a location that will minimize the need for future location when development in Auditor's Road begins. • Zoning of the subject area is B -1. • There are no specific sign classifications which address this type of public and /or governmental agency informational signage. Based on Staff review, the entrance /identification sign appears to most closely follow the provisions for a freestanding sign which is defined below: Free Standing Sign - A sign which is placed in the ground and not affixed to any part of any building. • -1129- • The B -1 regulations for freestanding sign(s) are provided below: One free standing sign per street frontage provided, however, said sign •' does not exceed forty-eight (48) square feet in area and twenty -five (25) feet in height and is not placed closer than ten (10) feet from any street right -of -way. The ten (10) foot setback maybe increased at intersections or other areas where freestanding signs may obstruct vehicular site distances. • The Mound Harbor District freestanding sign is generally consistent with the B- 1 regulations for this sign type but will not meet the 10 -FT setback(s) (depending upon final location) as it will probably be installed at or closely behind the ROW line for Shoreline Drive to allow for maximum visibility. - Proposed to be installed in the general vicinity of the east end of Auditor's Road to be visible from "need' Shoreline Drive - Proposed sign area is 36 SF and is less than the 48 SF allowance - Total height is approximately 7 FT; maximum allowed per code is 25 FT • Members are advised that Planning Commission review of the "Specific Sign Plan" is not required by the City Code. However, the City Council, at its discretion, may remand the proposal to the Planning Commission if it feels its review is needed and /or will be beneficial for the City Council. Recommendation • A draft resolution amending Resolution No. 09 -106 which approved the Specific Sign Program for the Auditor's Road wayfinding signage has been prepared for review /action by the City Council and is recommended for approval. • • Page 2 -1130- • CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 10- Resolution Amending Resolution No. 09 -106 for Specific Sign Program for Comprehensive Wayfinding Signage for Auditor's Road WHEREAS, at its December 8, 2009 meeting, the Mound City Council adopted Resolution No. 09 -0106 which approved a Specific Sign Program for Compehensive Wayfinding Signage for Auditor's Road; and WHEREAS, the plan included proposed locations for the wayfinding signage which included an entrance monument, a number of directory kiosks and regulatory signage; WHEREAS, the proposed location for the entrance monument in the median of Auditor's Road near Shoreline Drive; and WHEREAS, this location is not feasible due to field obstructions based upon review by Staff; and WHEREAS, a proposed new location for the entrance monument is near the entrance of the east end of the Auditor's Road property; and WHEREAS, an amendment of Resolution No. 09 -106 which approved the Specific Sign Program for the wayfinding signage project is requested to approve the new location; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 119 -5 (10) allows the City Council, by resolution, to approve a Specific Sign Program for a redevelopment project which is included in a Redevelopment Plan which has been established pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes; and WHEREAS, the sign project is located in the Auditor's Road District that is included in a Redevelopment Plan which was established in 2005; and WHEREAS, a copy of the wayfinding signage plan for Auditor's Road is on file at City Hall; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the request at its June 8, 2010 meeting. • -1131- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Mound, Minnesota, to amend Resolution No. 09 -106 which adopted the Specific Sign Program for wayfindmg signage to allow a new location for the entrance /identification sign in the Auditor's Road District. The City's approval of the amended Specific Sign Plan shall be subject to the following list of conditions: 1. Any and /or all comments from the City Council. 2. Contractor shall be responsible for procurement of any building, mechanical or related permits from the Building Official, as applicable. 3. As applicable, final sign location shall be subject to review by the City Staff and its consultant and involved public agencies including but not limited to Hennepin County Transportation, the Three Rivers Park District and HCRRA, as applicable. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted this 8 day of June 2010. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk and • • -1132- E9 0j, E7 5 E9 7 8 Ell 12 EIS 13 IFTEMN NO IT MOTOR VEHICLES MOTOR IQ VEHICLES Ae 15 E17 LostLake Harkir Y-0 CLEARANCE FROM SIGNS TO EDGE OF BIKE PATH. Ae 7 23 24 Ell E ES nAJk City of Mound Auditors Road District Exterior Signage Location Plan v/oo^L ~`^^`"^~^ "^`' AAAA �_- - ! BAES VIEW 9 ' I H L?r: 3' 3" q -3" 3' 3' 6" 12' 6' 2' � 10' I I AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN/ SIGN TYPE Al 001 1 /2 " =1' -0n SIGN COMPANY.ALL FINAL POLE& FOOTING SPECIFICATIONS 5 5 1 0 4 ~ ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLING SIGN COMPANY, INSTALLATION BY SIGN COMPANY 651 - 644 -4494 LANDSCAPE BY OTHERS 651 -644 -4289 NOTE FABRICATORTO REVIEW ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS. NO VISIBLE SCREWS, WELDS, OR ATTACHMENT METHODS. FABRICATING SIGN COMPANYTO PROVIDE COMPLETE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL BY VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS PRIOR TO FABRICATING/ INSTALLATON FABRICATING SIGN COMPANY TO PROVIDE FULL SIZE PATTERNS FOR APPROVAL BY VISUAL COMMUNCATONS PRIOR To FABRICATING/ INSTALLATION. Copyright 0 Th6 Mgiwl design ' v by V S U A L Commu.dndmn: Inc. It mmmt be mpled, —f—d mpmdund m any form and ab 1 +m,aio tM Pmperty a V I S U A L CommuNatbns, inc the relwe of Mla design to N w qw . ar w . ov from VISUAL CommoNat ' Inc Project 09.10.02 Date: 10/12/09 1 11/02/09 11/06/09 1 TB� i A 3/8'DEPTH FLATCUT OUT ALUMINUM DECORATIVE SIGN PANEL, PAINTED FINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE COLOR 1, REFERT02/002 W/ 1 W' DECORATIVE CUTOUT HOLES AND 1'X 6' FABRICATED CAR PAINTED FINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE COLOR 1, REFERTO 2/002 B 3' ALUMINUM DECORATIVE BALL,WSF4B BALLW /CAPTO RECIEVETAPERED POLE BALL AND ATTACHMENT CAP BY 'ORNAMENTAL POST, PANEL &TRAFFICE CONTROL SYSTEMS' OR EQUAL, PAINTED FINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE C CA OF mo 12 COLOR 1,REFERT02/002 C 2' ALUMINUM SQUARE ROD SUPPORT SYSTEM, PAINTED FINISH C CityofMound MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE COLOR 1, REFERTO 21002, 5 5341 Maywood Road 3/002 Mound, MN 55364 D 1/2'DEPTH FLAT CUT OUTALUMINUM DISK, PAINTEDFINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYUREMANE COLOR 2, REFERTO 2/002 W/ 1/8' ENGRAVED AND FILLED LOGO AND BORDER COLOR 1, A Auditors Road District REFER TO 2/002, WELDED TO BACKGROUND AND SUPPORTED BY ALUMINUM ARCS,1 PER SIDE, REFERTO DETAIL 1/002 E 250 ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTED DECORATIVE TAPERED POLE, EXTERIOR PAINTED FINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYUREFHANE E Exterior COLOR 1,REFERTO2/002 S Sign Design & F ALL ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTED SIGN CABINET 2"x4 "ALUMINUM S Standards SQUARE CHANNEL FRAME AS REQUIRED, 2- .125 ALUMINUM PANELS W /SPACERS, EXTERIOR PAINTED FINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE COLOR 1, REFERTO 3 /002 G FLAT CUT OUT TED / r /m MATTHEW r , PIN & NUT ASSEMBLY MOUNTED TO ALUMINUM SIGN PANEL AS REQUIRED H 2 -.125 FLAT CUT OUT ALUMINUM PANELS BACKTO BACKW /SPACEq FOR LETTER ATTACHMENTS, PAINTED FINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE COLOR 2, REFER TO 2/002, WELDED TO ALUMINUM SIGN BACKGROUND AS REQUIRED V VISUAL j j FABRICATED 1/2' 1 -BEAM BASE W/J -BOLT ATTACHMENT, 1 -BOLT TYPE, C C— uniutioae SIZE AND BASE PLATE, METAL TEMPLATE TO BE PROVIDED BY SIGN 4 4 75 Cl eve tend COMPANY FOR INSTALLATION OF MASONRY FOUNDATION, PAINTED A Av eau a FINISH MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE COLOR I, REFERT02/002 S a N I.I CONCRETE BASE ADEQUATETOWFM STAND 30ULWIND LOAD. I Ivy league Place ALL FOOTINGS & POLE DIMENSIONS ARE SUBJECTTO FIELD SURVEY S S a I n t P..1 M & SOIL CONTENT. RESULTSTO BE PROVIDED BYTHE INSTALLING M MI'.-- NOTE FABRICATORTO REVIEW ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS. NO VISIBLE SCREWS, WELDS, OR ATTACHMENT METHODS. FABRICATING SIGN COMPANYTO PROVIDE COMPLETE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL BY VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS PRIOR TO FABRICATING/ INSTALLATON FABRICATING SIGN COMPANY TO PROVIDE FULL SIZE PATTERNS FOR APPROVAL BY VISUAL COMMUNCATONS PRIOR To FABRICATING/ INSTALLATION. Copyright 0 Th6 Mgiwl design ' v by V S U A L Commu.dndmn: Inc. It mmmt be mpled, —f—d mpmdund m any form and ab 1 +m,aio tM Pmperty a V I S U A L CommuNatbns, inc the relwe of Mla design to N w qw . ar w . ov from VISUAL CommoNat ' Inc Project 09.10.02 Date: 10/12/09 1 11/02/09 11/06/09 1 TB� i SIGNS whichever is smaller. Area identification signs. One area identification sign is permitted per k street frontage, per commercial development provided, however, said sign does not exceed 32 square feet in area, and ten feet in height, and is not placed within ten feet of any street right -of -way. In addition, one wall sign per building is permitted not to exceed 24 square feet in area. C. Comprehensive sign plan. Comprehensive sign plan required as outlined in section 119 -4(o). (8) Light industrial a-1) district. Same regulations as outlined in subsection (6) of this section. (9) Planned development are�DA). S ame regu lations a s out lined i sub (4) (10) Special provisions of projects included in a redevelopment plan. Same regulatio 1 as outlined in subsection (4) of this section, unless the City Council, by resolution approves a specific sign program for a development project located within an area included in a redevelopment plan established in accordance with Minn. Stats. H 469.027 and 469.028. The sign program may include, but is not limited to, sales / and marketing signs, leasing signs, rental signs, and developer /contractor/builder (Code 1987, § 365.20; Ord. No. I, 8 -1 - ; d. o - 006, 5 -21 -2006) Sec. 119 -6. Construction standards and maintenance. (a) Except as otherwise noted in this district, permanent signs shall be constructed of durable, weather resistant materials anchored in a secure fashion and designed to withstand a wind pressure of 40 pounds per square foot. The exposed backs of all signs and sign structure shall be painted a neutral color. .- (b) Signs determined by the city building official to be in a state of disrepair shall be restored to good repair by the sign owner or property owner on which the sign is situated within 30 days after the mailing of written notice to repair from the building official. In the event a noncompliance with said notice, the city shall be authorized to remove said sign at the expense of the owner or property owner. (Code 1987, § 365.25; Ord. No. 16 - 2002, 8 25 2002) 0— CD119:11 -1135- C Y-400FINOU City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, W 55364 Auditors Road District Exterior Sign Design 0 p' il VISUAL ce>�mA1�.naa9 4] SCI eveland AvengeN —th S. l t. 2 2 3 NT L—" Place S. p Mlen<e 5 5 1 0 t 4 651 -644 -4494 651 -441 -4219 Copyright O 1Ne eripnal deelgn e by V�1 5 U A L Cnmmvnlatlo,u Inc R anent be rnpfed, natukertd pmdoM M y In.m and shall aIn Me p V I S U mp A mty "1 Camm .1 'nc The late 1 Ab dmtge N whoi In pan nhnll sole Nttm M UAL (even VISUAL Cmnmunbtlma. Drc- ProJecL 09.10.02 ,Date: 10/12/09 11/02/09 1 AREAlbtN — * h 4 % i • • i Copyright O 1Ne eripnal deelgn e by V�1 5 U A L Cnmmvnlatlo,u Inc R anent be rnpfed, natukertd pmdoM M y In.m and shall aIn Me p V I S U mp A mty "1 Camm .1 'nc The late 1 Ab dmtge N whoi In pan nhnll sole Nttm M UAL (even VISUAL Cmnmunbtlma. Drc- ProJecL 09.10.02 ,Date: 10/12/09 11/02/09 1 5341 Maywood Road • Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: December 8, 2009 Re: Review / Action — Specific Sign Program for Auditor's Road Wayfinding Signage Program Background Wayfinding signage is proposed to be constructed and installed in Auditor's Road with funding provided by the Transit Oriented Develoment (TOD) grant from Hennepin County. The signage proposed to be installed, in summary, includes an entrance monument, a number of directory kiosks and regulatory signage. The property is zoned B -1 and Staff is requesting City Council approval of the wayfinding plan as a "Specific Signage Program" as provided by City Code Chapter 119 -5 (10) which the City allows for areas included within a Redevelopment Plan (which includes the Mound Visions downtown redevelopment plan). Copy attached. • ' Discussion 1. No permit is required for signs erected by a governmental unit, provided however, that all signs shall conform with all other requirements of the City Code. 2. As members may recall, the City Council approved the Auditor's Road wayFnding program prepared by Visual Communications at its November 10, 2009 meeting and also authorized quotes. Only grant project activities and work product completed in advance of the December 31, 2009 grant deadline are eligible for reimbursement. Please refer to the attached graphics of entrance /identification sign and directory kiosks proposed for the subject area. A minor change is that the rock bases are being replaced with a steel structure to resemble Mound's landscaping features which was done to facilitate a prompt construction timeline, if possible. 3. A preliminary site plan is also attached which is currently under review by Staff in cooperation with Visual Communications. It is anticipated that the entrance sign will be placed near the east end area of Auditor's Road and the directory kiosks will be placed in and around Auditor's Road including the intersections with Shoreline Drive and Bartlett Boulevard. Members are advised the proposed final location of the signs may be subject to change depending upon • sight distances, review by Staff /consultant and /or public agencies and /or field obstructions. Consent Agenda Add -On Item -1137- 4. There are no specific sign classifications which addresses this type of public and /or governmental agency informational signage. Based on Staff review, the entrance /identification and directory kiosks appear to most closely follow • the provisions for a freestanding sign which is defined below: Free Standing Sign - A sign which is placed in the ground and not affixed to any part of any building. 5. The B -1 regulations for freestanding sign(s) are provided below: One free standing sign per street frontage provided, however, said sign does not exceed forty -eight (48) square feet in area and twenty -five (25) feet in height and is not placed closer than ten (10) feet from any street right -of -way. The ten (10) foot setback may be increased at intersections or other areas where freestanding signs may obstruct vehicular site distances. 6. The Mound Harbor District freestanding sign (1) is generally consistent with the B -1 regulations for this sign type with the exception of the 10 -FT setback. • Proposed to be installed in the general vicinity of the east end of Auditor's Road to be visible from "new' Shoreline Drive • Proposed sign area is 36 SF and is less than the 48 SF allowance • Total height is approximately 7 FT; max is 25 FT 7. The Mound Harbor District directory kiosks (5) are generally consistent with the • B -1 District for this sign type with the exception of the 10 -FT setback and the one (1) sign per frontage restriction. • Proposed to be installed in and around Auditor's Road District including but not limited to the intersection area(s) at Commerce Boulevard and Shoreline Drive • Proposed sign area is 12 SF and is less than the 48 SF allowance • Total height is approximately 8 FT; max is 25 FT 8. Regulatory signage was included in the wayfinding program but is not generally subject to permitting. It is being mentioned because design /types for the regulatory signage (i.e. poles, etc.) have been proposed to be changed out, if possible. 9. Members are advised that Planning Commission review of the "Specific Sign Plan" is not required by the City Code. However, the City Council, at its discretion, may remand the proposal to the Planning Commission if it feels its review is needed and /or will be beneficial for the City Council. • • Page 2 -1138- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: 6/8/2010 Re: Request for amendment to temporary sign permit for 2010 Mound Farmers' Market &More Summary. At its April 13, 2010 meeting, the Mound City Council approved a temporary sign permit application from the Mound Farmers' Market & More (MFM &M) to promote the new 2010 market activities to be held in downtown Mound which included banners and portable signage (sandwich boards) at various private and public locations for periods beyond the standard allowances of 15 days and 10 days respectively. Members are advised that an amended request was received on 6/8 and is outlined below: Original Banner Request Two (2) banners to be displayed four (4) weeks prior to the first day of the market opening (April 19 through May 15) at the intersection of County Road 15 and County Road 110 (Crow River Bank) and on the decorative fence in front of the Lost Lake Villa commercial building which includes Caribou Coffee and Sir Knight Cleaners. The original proposed banner dates were April 15 — May 15 Amended 6/8 Banner Request: Date Change Recognize alternate 4 week timeframe for the 2 original banners as the installation date was delayed and did not occur until on or around May 10 Additionally, a substitute location of the decorative fencing at Mound Marketplace was used. Amended dates for the original request are May 10 -June 13. The banners on the Mound Marketplace and Lost Lake Villa decorative fences are to be removed on June 13 based on information from the applicant. • Proposed New Banner Locations Display one (1) banner near the "Welcome to Mound" sign on County Road 15 / Shoreline Drive with proposed dates of on or around June 14 -July 11. Placement of one (1) banner on decorative fencing in front of Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church along County Road 110 (pending approval from property owners) with proposed dates of or around June 14 — July 11. Staff Comments. • Permits for banners can be issued up to four (4) times per year. • Banner placement on decorative fencing is permitted provided it is used in conjunction with a government, quasi - public or similar related special event. 6/8 CONSENT AGENDA ITEM • Temporary permit fee was waived with original permit. Fee waiver for new requested banner locations is not being requested. Recommendation. City staff recommends that the City Council approve an amendment to the original temporary sign request for the Mound Farmers Market & More, as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The alternate timeframe and location(s) for the original banners are authorized (after the fact). 2. The proposed new locations for the banners and extended installation period beyond the 15-day time period is approved. 3. Applicant is responsible for obtaining property owner permission for sign placement on private property. 4. Final signage placement is subject to review and approval by the City of Mound. No signage shall be placed in a location so as to affect vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The City of Mound reserves the right to modify sign placement in the field. 5. As applicable, the applicant shall be required to obtain any and /or all required permits from other agencies including but not limited to Hennepin County. • Page 2 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 Fax 952 - 472 -0620 SEASONAL, BANNER, & PORTABLE SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION SITE Property Address Zone Business Name: Mound Farmers' Market and M ore Phone APPLICANT Name Karly Curtis Email: Phone Fax Other Cell: OWNER Name _ Mound Farmers' Market and More Phone MINNOW Fax Other SIGN Company Name CONTRACTOR Address Contact Person: Email Phone Fax Other Cell: See City Code Chapter 119 -4 ❑ Seasonal Sign $25 - Dates from to Size feet x feet = sf Message Seasonal Signs - Seasonal signs of a temporary or portable nature may be used in the non - residential districts to promote or advertise on- premise seasonal services or merchandise. Such signs shall be limited to a maximum of thirty -two (32) square feet and shall not be left in place for more than a two (2) month period. Permits and fees shall be required for all seasonal signs, and permits may be issued no more than two (2) times per calendar year per business. ® Banner /Pennant $25 - Dates from on or around June 14 -July 11, 2010 Describe event: Banner A dvertisement for the Mound Farmers Market & More Sign locations for 2 manners (list or attach map): t the Welcome to Mound sign on Cty Rd 15 At OLD. fence facing Ct Rd 110 (pending approval from OLL property owners) Temporary banners and pennants employed for grand openings or business establishments, special events or promotions and holidays are not exempt from permits and fees and shall be removed within fifteen (15) days upon permit issuance unless an alternate schedule is approved by the City Council. Temporary banners and pennants are prohibited from being placed upon any decorative fencing unless the banner or pennant is used in conjunction with a government, a quasi - public function, or similar - related special event. Permits for banners and pennants can be issued no more than four (4) times per calendar year. ❑ Portable Sign (no fee) — Dates from to Number of signs Sign locations (list or attach map) Describe sign (message, materials, etc.) Portable Signs used for the purpose of directing the public may be permitted under the following conditions: (a) Said sign is coincidental to, or used in conjunction with, a governmental unit or quasi - public function; and (b) The period of use of said sign shall not exceed ten (10) consecutive days; and © Signs shall not be used more than four (4) times during a calendar year; and (d) Signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised event and /or on such other premises followin"` approval of a temporary sign permit by the City of Mound. Administrative approval of a portable sign permit is permitted if the following conditions are met: 1. The sign is not being 'piaceeon public property. 2. Written permission from the property owner of record is provided if being located off- premises. 3. The criteria reference in subsgctions (a), (b), and (c) above are met. 4. The proposed location of the sign is reviewed and deemed acceptable by Mound Staff, which shall include the Police, Planning, and Engineering Departments, based on the following criteria: • The sign is not being placed in the road right -of -way. • The sign does not obstruct the sight triangle for pedestrian or vehicular traffic. • Placement of the sign does not create any potential traffic or other related hazard; and (e) Portable sign placement on public property requires City Council approval; and (f) Such signs shall require the issuance of a permit but will be exempt from all fees; and (g) In the instance of a multi -use facility, only one seasonal sign may be placed on the premises at any one time. Applicants are advised that incomplete applications or insufficient information can delay the processing of the permit request or may result in the application being rejected. Please fully complete all involved sections of the application and provide as much detail as possible, including, but not limited to, the proposed locations of signs, using addresses or landmarks, and written permission from the property owner for off -site locations. KarLy Cwt /ATE /Ito APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY & DATE PLANS CHECKED BY APPROVED BY & DATE COPIED APPROVED ZONING Recommendation A draft resolution approving the Speck Sign Program for the Auditor's Road • wayfinding signage has been prepared for review /action by the City Council and is recommended for approval. • • • Page 3 -1139- MEMORANDUM To: City Manager Kandis Hanson From: Police Chief Jim Kurtz Date: June 2, 2010 Subject: Police Explorer Post .......................................... ..............................� On April 30, 2010, the Mound Police Explorer Post participated in the annual State Police Explorer Conference. The Police Explorer Conference is an educational opportunity where hundreds of high school aged Police Explorers from around the state compete in thirteen different police operation exercises including; traffic stops, crime prevention, accident reconstruction, and bomb threats. Each team consists of four Police Explorers and they are randomly selected to compete in four different exercises. Mound had two teams competing and they won first place recognition in two categories: Crime Prevention and White Collar Crime Investigation, and fifth place recognition in Crime Scene Search. I would like to publically recognize the Mound Police Explorers for their hard work and accomplishments at the June 8, 2010 City Council meeting. •' 0 -1140- CITY OF MOUND • RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING AND CONGRATULATING THE MOUND POLICE EXPLORER POST FOR THEIR STATE CHAMPION PERFORMANCE AT THE 2010 POLICE EXPLORER CONFERENCE. WHEREAS, The Mound Police Department Explorer Post participated in the 2010 Law Enforcement Explorer Conference in Rochester, Minnesota. WHEREAS, The Annual Police Explorer Conference is an educational opportunity where hundreds of high school aged Police Explorers from around the state meet and compete in thirteen, very specific, practical team exercises in police operations. WHEREAS, Mound Police Explorers Amanda Abrahamson, Charlie Bennett, Michelle Loma, Joey Luder, Ryan Stumpf, Ben and Brandon Wenande won first place recognition in two categories: Crime Prevention and White Collar Crime Investigation, and fifth place recognition in Crime Scene Search. WHEREAS, Mound Police Sergeant Mike Sussman, Detectives Dan Niccum and Jami Wittke, and Officers Ryan Spencer and Paul Hooper served as advisors to organize and coordinate the Mound Police Explorer Post. WHEREAS, The Mound Police Explorer Post's accomplishments are remarkable and unprecedented having won three state awards in only their second year as a Post. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The Mound City Council recognizes and congratulates the members of the Mound Police Explorer Post and their advisors for their state championship performance at the 2010 Police Explorer Conference. The above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound on the 8th day of June, 2010. Mayor Mark Hanus ATTEST: Bonnie Ritter City Clerk • -1141- • MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Finance Director Catherine Pausche Date: June 3, 2010 Subject: CBD Parking Program and Staff's Recommended Program Changes Summary. A workshop on the Central Business Parking program was held with council members and staff on April 26, 2010. At the meeting, it was requested that staff resend the information on the recommended changes to the CBD parking program to all program participants prior to bringing it before the council for approval. Consequently, program participants were mailed an informational packet regarding the proposed CBD program on November 20, 2009 and again on May 4, 2010, with a request to contact staff with questions and/or comments. • Staff also met for a final review to compare the old formula to the new formula. Staff feels it is fair that both the providers and users of parking help support the maintenance of the parking spaces. With the prospects of redevelopment for this area being pushed further into the future, maintenance demands will continue to grow. Staff did question the amount being paid to lease the spaces as we tried to manage the increase in costs for property owners who required additional parking. Keeping the lease cost at $50 per year resulted in property owners who provide parking receiving less than they have historically. In order to rectify this situation, Staff recommends the property owners supplying the parking receive $100 per year for each surplus space provided per PID, versus the $50 per year per space that was previously proposed. Recommendation. Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached CBD Parking Program, as proposed, and the CBD Parking Program Shared Parking Agreement. Staff also recommends that the council consider requiring all Langdon District property owners currently in the program to participate and sign the CBD Parking Program Shared Parking Agreement as a condition for the City to provide the services and help fund the program. If not all owners currently in the program are willing to participate, the program would cease to exist and property owners would be responsible for their own maintenance. is -1142- CITY OF MOUND • RESOLUTION NO. 10 -_ RESOLUTION APPROVING CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING PROGRAM FOR 2010 WHEREAS, the Central Business District Parking Program (hereinafter "CBD Parking Program ") was established in and provides for a system of shared parking within the an area in the Central Business District, with certain maintenance activities provided by the City in the areas covered by the CBD Parking Program, and provides for payment of a CBD parking assessment by the participating property owners (hereinafter "Owners ") to offset costs incurred by the City in carrying out its obligations hereunder; and WHEREAS, a list of the Owners and involved parcels of land located within the area of the City which are included in the CBD Parking Program are shown on the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B respectively; WHEREAS, recommended modifications have been recommended by Staff including but not limited to, parking space calculation method and fees, the removal of a number of properties from the program, inclusion of a non - participating property and the preparation of a maintenance agreement with each participant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Mound hereby approves the • 2010 CBD Parking Program as recommended by Staff subject to conditions from the City Council. Adopted by the City Council this 8 th day of June 2010. Mayor Hanus, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -1143- 6-Y. h; b i} A STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING PROGRAM FOR 2010 — Lake Langdon District Only 0 1. Parking Stall Determination and Calculation. The following suggested changes to the CBD parking stall assessment and calculation of parking space(s) are recommended as part of Staff s recommendation for continuation of the CBD parking program for 2010: • Only main/ 1 St floor space will be counted for CBD Parking Program proposed for 2010 • SF information used for all buildings was obtained from Hennepin County Assessor's Office • One (1) space per 400 SQ business and professional parking requirement will be applied to all buildings (main floor / 1 St floor) (the old method looked at use of the building and number of customer and employee spaces required) • Estimate of available parking stalls provided for subject properties was determined based upon use of aerial information and field evaluation 2251 Commerce JOHN AND PATRICIA TOMBERS • Building is 894 SF • Estimated off street stalls provided: 4 •' • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 2 Present CBD Calculation: 5 stall assessment Proposed 2010 Calculation: 2 stall credit 2261 Commerce DAVID DETERS TRUSTEE Building is 4456 SF (2536 SF - 1S floor 1920 SF — basement) Estimate off street stalls provided: 3 Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 6 (Note: Parking variance was approved in 1976) Present CBD Calculation: 10.5 stall assessment Proposed 2010 Calculation: 3 stall assessment 2271 Commerce FIVE SIGMA LLC • Building is 8970 SF (4360 SF —'l floor 4360 SF — basement) • Estimated off street stalls provided: 0 • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 11 Present CBD Calculation: 19.5 stall assessment Proposed 2010 Calculation: 11 stall assessment • -1144- 2301 Commerce (PETER JOHNSON) • Building is 3072 SF 0 872 - 1 st floor 1200 SF — basement) • Estimated off street stalls provided: 11 • • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 5 Present CBD Calculation: N/A — not currently participating in program Proposed 2010 Calculation: 6 stall credit 2281 Commerce JOHN'S VARIETY • Building is 13908 SF ( 6954 SF 1 St floor 6954 SF — basement) • Estimated off street stalls provided: 6 (Note: All constructed spaces are being used for sales /display) • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 17 parking spaces. (Note: Parking variance for property was approved in 1973) Present CBD Calculation: 26 stall assessment • Proposed 2010 Calculation: 17 stall assessment (Note: Proposed 2010 calculation not reduced for existing on -site spaces as all are being used sales /display purposes) 2313 Commerce NETKA • Building is 7840 SF (4827 SF — 1ST floor 867 SF — 2 nd floor apartment 2167 SF — basement • Estimated off street stalls provided: 3 • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 12 Present CBD Calculation: 13 stall assessment Proposed 2010 Calculation: 9 stall assessment • 2321 Commerce PTS Holdings • Building is 6300 SF (5264-SP— V floor 1036 SF — basement) • Estimated off street stalls provided: 8 • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 13 Present CBD Calculation: 10.5 stall assessment Proposed 2010 Calculation: 5 stall assessment 2339 Commerce (MEISEL FORMER BANK BUILDING) • Building is 4923 SF ( 2989 SF —1S floor 1934 SF - basement/other) • Estimated off street stalls provided: 26 spaces • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 7 Present CBD Calculation: 16 stall assessment (combined with 2365) Proposed 2010 Calculation: 19 stall credit 2345 Commerce KOENIG • Building is 10296 SF (5148 SF floor 5148 SF — basement) • Estimated off street stalls provided: 9 • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 13 Present CBD Calculation: 33 stall assessment Proposed 2010 Calculation: 4 stall assessment • -1145- 2365/2363 Commerce (MEISEL SOUTH BUILDING) • Building is 11340 SF (5670 SF —1S floor 5670 — basement/other) • Estimated off street stalls provided: 10 • Stalls (estimate) required by current code: 14 • Present CBD Calculation: 16 stall assessment (combined with 2339) Proposed 2010 Calculation: 4 stall assessment XXXX Commerce (MEISEL PARKING LOT NEXT TO OLL) • Vacant/no building • Estimated off street stalls provided: 15 Present CBD Calculation: Lease Credit of $1,500 Proposed 2010 Calculation: 15 stall credit 2. CBD Program Participants Recommended to be Released Staff recommends that the following properties be released from the CBD Parking Program for 2010, therefore making the revised district in the Lake Langdon area only: Crow River Bank — 2290 Commerce Boulevard Roger Beckel — 5567 Shoreline Drive (2009 building demo) True Value Hardware — 2250 Commerce Boulevard Ken Perbix — 5575 Shoreline Drive Lauer — 5581 Shoreline Drive Larson Printing — 2316 Commerce Boulevard • Mound Masonic Lodge — 2372 Commerce Boulevard House of Moy (former) — 5555 Shoreline Drive (2009 building demo) 3. CBD Program Participant Recommendated to be Added Staff recommends that the property located at 2301 Commerce Boulevard owned by Peter Johnson property be included in the CBD Parking Program for 2010 as this property is generally maintained by City forces due to expediency and its proximity to other properties' parking area(s). 4. Maintenance Agreement for Participants and City of Mound As part of Staff's recommendation for continuation of the program for 2009 -2010, language in the agreements to be executed with the involved owners has been added that addresses maintenance, right of entry and code enforcement issues. At present, there are no such formalized agreements between the participants and the City in place. 5. Continuation of Cost Sharing for CBD Parking Program. In 2008, $6300.00 was collected from participating businesses in the CBD program for plowing and sanding. The program actually cost of total of $15,853 with the City absorbing the remaining $9,553.00 (50% of the $12,600 cost plus lease payments of 3,253). This cost sharing arrangement for the CBD program existed because the City of Mound is a significant land owner in the subject area which is used for parking and access purposes. • -1146- Beginning in 2010 — 2011, Staff recommends subsidizing to the extent of overtime incurred for the plowing and sanding events (if applicable) and funding a portion of the cost to lease spaces from owners with surplus spaces. Services will be charged at the • base rate for a Public Works maintenance worker that includes salary, benefits and an overhead and equipment allocation. Participants will receive a $100 credit for each space provided and be charged $50 for each space required. Public Works - CBD Parking Langdon District Rates including Benefits & Overhead 10 10 Regular 61.65 Overtime Mon -Sat 1.5x 66.34 Sunday 2.5x 90.39 Holiday 3.5x 114.44 Langdon District (Based on Regular Rates) - ESTIMATED 10 EVENTS PER YEA Estimated Cost of No. of Hrs per Labor/ Total Cost events Estimated event Overhead Materials per event per year Total Cost Plowing Sanding Striping (Every 2 yrs) Pothole Repair Total Estimated Cost Signing - (sign, pole, cap) - Charged individually to property owners Sweeping 10 $ 1,233 10 $ 904 0.5 $ 322 1 $ 1,415 $ 3,873 1 $ 150 2 $ 123.30 $ - $ 123.30 0.25 $ 15.41 $ 75.00 $ 90.41 8 $ 493.20 $ 150.00 $ 643.20 8 $ 493.20 $ 921.30 $1,414.50 1 $ 61.65 $ 100.00 $ 161.65 2 $ 150.00 $ - $ 150.00 -1147- City of Mound Langdon Area CBD Parking Program New Formula Proposal Assuming 10 Plowing /Sanding Events 14- 117 -24 44 0038 2251 Commerce JOHN TOMBERS 14- 117 -24 44 0037 2261 Commerce WESTONKA SPORTS (David Deters, Trustee) 14- 117 -24 44 0039 2271 Commerce FIVE SIGMA LLC 14- 117 -24 44 0036 2281 Commerce JOHN'S VARIETY (John Royer) 14- 117 -24 44 0041 2301 Commerce PETER JOHNSON 14- 117 -24 44 0042 2313 Commerce NETKA 14- 117 -24 44 0001 2321 Commerce PTS HOLDINGS, INC. 14- 117 -24 44 0002 2339 Commerce MEISEL BUILDING (BANK) 14- 117 -24 44 0004 2345 Commerce KOENIG A 14- 117 -24 44 0006 XXXX Commerce MEISEL PARKING 00 113.44 -2.00 14- 117 -24 44 0003185 2365/2363 Commerce MEISEL BUILDING (SOUTH) Net Meisel Properties (4) (5) (6) $50 charge % OF COST Spaces per space Net Amount TOTAL x % Needed ( +) needed/ Due OF (3) W Provided ( -) $100 credit to Program 4.8 (Assuming (l)-(2) per space (Owed to Owner) 0 10 events) 5 provided 7.4 2.93 113.44 -2.00 - 200.00 -86.56 5.02 194.46 3.00 150.00 344.46 6.90 267.38 11.00 550.00 817.38 10.67 413.23 17.00 850.00 1263.23 7.74 299.79 -6.00 - 600.00 - 300.21 8.79 340.31 9.00 450.00 790.31 11.51 445.64 5.00 250.00 695.64 15.27 591.48 -19.00 - 1900.00 - 1308.52 11.92 461.84 4.00 200.00 661.84 6.28 243.08 -15.00 - 1500.00 - 1256.92 12.97 502.36 4.00 200.00 702.36 1,336.91 -30.00 - 3,200.00 - 1,863.09 • (1) ( ( Wgt Avg PARK. SPACES of REQ PROV. (11&(2) 50% 50% 2 4 2.8 6 3 4.8 11 0 6.6 17 0 10.2 5 11 7.4 12 3 8.4 13 8 11.0 7 26 14.6 13 9 11.4 0 15 6.0 14 10 12.4 10 Aa A" L • 2009 - 2010 CBD ASSESSMENT ROLL Langdon District Proposal • • COMPARISON OF OLD VS- NEW METHOD OLD NEW OLD NEW 2009-2010 PARK. SPACES PARK. SPACES 2008 2009 Langdon REQ PROV. REQ'D. PROV. Actual Actual District Weighted Average of Spaces Needed vs Provided used to calculate maintenance costs => 50%150% Leased Spaces Cost/Credit ==_ => I I 1 1 $50 per spac 14- 117 -24 44 0038 2251 Commerce JOHN TOMBERS 5 0 2 4 238.39 239.42 (86.56) 14- 117 -24 44 0037 2261 Commerce WESTONKA SPORTS (David Deters, Trustee) 10.5 0 6 3 281.53 282.18 344.46 14-117 -24 44 0039 2271 Commerce FIVE SIGMA LLC 19.5 0 11 0 494.28 496.46 817.38 14- 117 -24 44 0036 2281 Commerce JOHN'S VARIETY (John Royer) 30 4 17 0 661.67 664.26 1,263.23 14- 117 -24 44 0041 2301 Commerce PETER JOHNSON - - 5 11 - - (300.21) 14- 117 -24 44 0042 2313 Commerce NETKA 16 3 12 3 344.49 347.18 790.31 14- 117 -24 44 0001 2321 Commerce PTS HOLDINGS, INC. 26 15.5 13 8 326.46 327.81 695.64 14- 117 -24 44 0002 2339 Commerce MEISEL BUILDING (BANK) 36 20 7 26 460.62 461.72 (1,308.52) 14 -117 -24 44 0004 2345 Commerce KOENIG 33 0 13 9 217.72 219.03 661.84 A 14- 117 -24 44 0006 XXXX Commerce MEISEL PARKING 0 0 0 15 (1,428.87) (1,428.15) (1,256.92) �o ' 14 117 - 24 44 0003185 236512363 Commerce MEISEL BUILDING (SOUTH) - - 14 10 - - 702.36 Ufi _42A im At 1.596.29 1.609.91 2.323.00 Net Meisel Properties (968.25) (966.43) (1,863.09) Highlight of Chances to New Proposal: Apply uniformlobjective measurements to determine parking spaces required and spaces provided Do not factor in feet of store front or market value in equation City and participants share in the cost to to lease spaces versus the City paying all of the cost City only subsidizes to the extent of overtime rates vs. regular rates and a portion of the lease cost 6ythib;+ 6 5/4/10 Draft Single Agreement CBD PARIGNG PROGRAM SHARED PARK NG AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the _ day of , 20_ by and between, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and all of the individuals listed and named on the attached Exhibit A, and shown as signators of this Agreement, (hereinafter collectively "Owners ") Background 1. Owners own various tracts and parcels of land located within the area of the City shown on the attached Exhibit B, and referred to herein as the CBD. 2. The Central Business District Parking Program (hereinafter "CBD Parking Program ") was established in and provides for a system of shared parking within the Central Business District, with certain maintenance activities provided by the City in the areas covered by the CBD Parking Program, and provides for payment of a CBD parking assessment by the Owners to offset costs incurred by the City in carrying out its obligations • hereunder. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and their mutual promises the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Parking spaces allocated. The parking spaces shown on Exhibit C are to be made available for the use by all of the Owners, Owners' employees, customers and invitees in conjunction with Owners' business activities within the CBD, provided, that this Agreement confers no exclusive right to any Owner to any specific spaces or space within the area shown on the Exhibit C. 2. City Obligation. During the term of this Agreement the City will provide certain maintenance activities on the parking area described on Exhibit C. The maintenance activities are limited to the following all to be performed at intervals in the absolute discretion of the City: snow removal; sanding; sweeping; signage, striping, pothole filling and other minor surface repairs. With respect to the parking spaces shown in Exhibit C., the City will also be responsible for providing maintenance activities on areas owned by either the Owners or the City serving as access to parking. • 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 -1150- 3. I. Parking Use Fee. As consideration for overseeing the CBD Parking Program, • maintaining parking and access areas, the Owners agree to pay the City an annual parking fee. II. Determination of Fee. The fee for the year 2010 will be based on the cost to the city of operating the CBD Parking Program for the period from Julyl, 2010 to June 30, 2011 (the 2010 -2011 Contract year). The fee will be allocated on the basis of the allocation formula contained in Exhibit C. III. Payment of Fee. As soon as possible following July 1, the City will notify each Owner of the fee for the 2010 -2011 contract year. The Owners may pay the fee at any time before ' at which time the City may, and is hereby authorized by the Owners to spread the fee against their property in the CBD to be collected in one installment along with other taxes. IV. Future Years. Unless an Owner elects to terminate this Agreement, the fee for future years will be determined in the same manner as for the 2010 -2011 contract year fee. 4. Use of Parking Areas. Owners agrees that they will use parking spaces shown on Exhibit C only for temporary parking of motor vehicles of the Owner, employees, customers, and invitees. Owners may also use the parking areas on their property for the temporary parking of delivery vehicles and vehicles used in connection with maintaining, servicing or repairing their property. The City may erect signs announcing these regulations and that vehicles in violation of such regulations may be impounded and towed at the expense of the owner of the vehicle. The signage may also establish limits on the duration and the times of day that vehicles may park. Each Owner, as to parking spaces located on property owned by said Owner, hereby authorizes and consents to removal by the City, its officers, agents or employees of any vehicles located on Owner's property not for the purposes described above. Each Owner, as to parking spaces located on property owned by said Owner further authorizes and consents to allow the City to remove from such area any other vehicle, item or material located in such a manner as to interfere with the use of the spaces for parking, or the ability of the City to conduct its maintenance and repair activities; or otherwise constitutes a nuisance under the City Code. The City may from time to time with the consent of the Owners establish further rules and regulations applicable to parking areas covered by this Agreement. 5. Right of Entry City and its agents shall have the right to enter upon the Property after the date of this Agreement for the purpose of maintenance and related activities including but not limited to, snow removal, striping, erecting signage, pothole filling and other minor surface repairs; and for any enforcement activities pursuant to paragraph 4. The • Owner will be responsible for making the Property available for such activities. The City will not be obligated to do any work on areas on the Property which are made inaccessible by the parking of vehicles or storage of materials. 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 -1151- 6. Indemnification and Insurance. Except for the negligent or willful misconduct of • the City in carrying out its obligations hereunder, each Owner, as to claims originating on the property owned by such Owner agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and all other Owner from any claims for property damage, personal injury or death arising out of use of such Owner's property as parking in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Each Owner will furnish the City with evidence that such Owner has liability insurance in an amount acceptable to the City insuring the claims for which the indemnity is given. The insurance will also name the City as an additional insured and will contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City. Such insurance will be kept in place at all times during the term of this Agreement or any extension. The City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Owners from any claims or causes of action for property damage, personal injury or death occasioned by or arising out of its actions under this Agreement caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. The City will also provide the Owners with evidence that it has liability insurance in an amount acceptable to the Owners insuring against the claims or causes of action described above and which contains a waiver of subrogation as to the Owners. 7 Recording of Agreement The City may, at its discretion, record this Agreement and Owner shall pay all costs associated with doing so. 8. Effect upon Subsequent Owners The Agreement is intended to run with the • land and is binding upon the parties herein and their respective successors and assigns 9. Miscellaneous. A. Either party may terminate this Agreement if the other party fails to comply with all of the requirements imposed upon them hereunder, or in the Resolution, and fails to cure such non compliance within days following written notice of such failure. B. The City may also terminate this Agreement upon 60 -day written notice to the Owners if the termination by any Owners results in a reduction in available parking spaces below the amount needed to make the continuation of the program feasible.. C. This Agreement will be automatically extended for successive additional one year terms unless any party notifies the others in writing at least 30 days before the expiration of the current term that it elects not to renew. In such case, the Agreement will continue as to the non - electing Owners unless the City determines the continuation of the program is not feasible. D. Owners whose participation in the program is discontinued for any reason: (i) shall have all responsibility for maintaining their parking area in conformity with all applicable regulations and requirements; and (ii) may not, after the effective date of such discontinuation use any of the parking areas in the CDB Parking Program for parking purposes for themselves, -their employees, or their customers or invitees. E. Owners waive and release the City from any claim or cause of action, of any nature • arising out of or occasioned by termination or non - renewal of this Agreement. 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 -1152- F. This Agreement constitutes only a license to Owners to use parking areas not located is on such Owner's property the for the purposes and subject to the limitations herein; and shall not be construed as creating any right, title or interest in such areas. 10. Governing Law This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with and be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11. Notices and Demands All notices, demands or other communications under this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and shall be sufficiently given and deemed given when delivered personally or mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested) or registered mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed as follows: A. To Owners: See Exhibit A. B. To City: Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 or to such other person at such other address as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other as provided in this Section. • 12. Amendment This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto only by written instrument executed in accordance with the same procedures and formality followed for the execution of this Agreement. 13. Counterparts This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in their names and behalf and on or as of the date first above written. [ Signature lines for all Owners shown on Exhibit A] Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) • The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 5 20_,by of ,a , Owner of the property located at , Mound, MN 55364. 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 -1153- Notary Public NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL CITY OF MOUND STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. Kandis M. Hanson City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ' 20__ by Kandis M. Hanson, the City Manager of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Notary Public • • is 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 -1154- 0 List of Owners and Property Addresses [Exhibit to be Supplied Prior to Execution] • 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 Exhibit A -1155- Exhibit B. 0' Map Showing Parking Areas within District. [To be Supplied Prior to Execution] • C7 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 -1156- • Exhibit C. Fee Allocation Formula • [To be Supplied Prior to Execution, but is expected to be based on Staff Recommendations to be supplied to Owners as part of their agreement review process.] 360353v6 JBD MU220 -5 -1157- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: June 3, 2010 SUBJECT: City Council public hearing for review of zoning amendment for Bethel United Methodist Church located at 2116 Commerce Boulevard APPLICANT: City of Mound PUBLIC HEARING. A public hearing has been scheduled to be held as part of the Tuesday, June 8, 2010 City Council meeting at 7:30 PM for the purpose of reviewing a proposed zoning amendment to City Code Section 129.68 (Official Map) to change the zoning of the United Methodist Church parcel (portion), located at 2116 Commerce Boulevard, from B -1 Commercial to R -3 Residential. REVIEW PROCEDURE. Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd. 3 states that no zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the • planning agency or by the governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published and mailed to all properties within 350 FT of the subject site at least ten (10) days in advance of the public hearing. Members are advised that the notice of public hearing was published in the Laker on Saturday, May 29, 2010 and was also mailed on May 26, 2010. A copy of the public hearing notice was also posted on the City Hall bulletin board. City Code Section 129 -34 (a) (1) also requires that any proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission for review. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW. A copy of the Planning Report, which was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 4, 2010 meeting, has been included and provides background regarding the proposed amendment. Some of the Planning Commission's discussion included clarification regarding the treatment of public or institutional uses in the Comprehensive Plan. In the latest Comprehensive Plan, all churches were included in the public or institutional category. Previously, the property was classified as medium density residential and auto - destination district. One benefit of this classification is that future land use changes will involve a comprehensive plan amendment and community discussion about the appropriate use of the site. While the public or institutional category was used in the 2002 Comprehensive Plan, some properties with churches, such as this one, were not classified in the category. • -1158- Members are advised that the Planning Commission voted five (5) in favor and one (1) opposed to recommend approval of the proposed zoning map amendment as recommended by Staff. A copy of the May 4, 2010 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts has been included. RECOMMENDATION. Approval. A proposed draft of the ordinance amendment has been included for consideration /action by the City Council. U: \SSmith\My Documents\Planning Reports \20D.0 \executivesummaryzoning ordinance BetheLDOC -1159- 5 Legend R-1 R-1 PDA R-1A R-1A PDA R-2 R-3 R-3 PDA B-1 't i0a B-2 B-3 PED 5 ? • • • CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. —2010 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOUND AMENDING SECTION 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) AS IT RELATES TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP TO REZONE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2116 COMMERCE BOULEVARD FROM B -1 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO R -3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Amend City Code Subsection 129.68 as follows: PID Property Existing Zoning Proposed Address Zonin 13- 117 -24 -32 -0177 2116 B -1 Central R -3 Multiple Commerce Business District Family Boulevard Residential District The Zoning Map of the City of Mound on file with the City Clerk is hereby amended in accordance with this zoning provision. Passed by the City Council this Published in The Laker the day of 2010. day of , 2010. Effective on , 2010. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -1161- Mayor Mark Hanus NOTICE OF A CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP • NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 8, 2010 to hold a public hearing to consider rezoning the property located at 2116 Commerce Boulevard, known as Bethel United Methodist Church, which is zoned B -1 Central Business District to R -3 Multiple Family Residential District. Information related to the proposed rezoning is available and will be provided upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Jill Norlander, Planning and Inspections Secretary Published in the Laker on May 29, 2010 COPY 0 u -1162- Y • 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD CITY OF MOUND M OUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com May 11, 2010 Bethel United Methodist Church. 2116 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Notification to Extend Deadline for Action on Variance(s) Application This letter is in regard to the rezoning application that was submitted and deemed complete by the City of Mound (serving as the applicant) for the Bethel United Methodist Church property located at 2116 Commerce Boulevard on or around April 6, 2010. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, please be advised that the City of Mound hereby extends the deadline for approval/denial of the rezoning request for an additional 60 days. As you are aware, the rezoning application associated with the subject property was • included on the May 4, 2010 Planning Commission meeting agenda and was recommended for approval and is anticipated to be forwarded to the City Council for public hearing and formal action at its June S, 2010 meeting, with your permission. Therefore, the purpose for the extension is to allow adequate time to prepare for the upcoming City Council public hearing including, but not limited to, the preparation of any and/or all Staff Reports and related documents associated with the City's review and pending action(s). If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (952) 472 -0604 or by email at sarahsmith@cityofinound.com I will be happy to answer any questions you may have. Si i mi Community Development Director • ® printed on recycled paper -1163- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 4, 2010 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Michael welcomed the public and called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Grant Johnson, Michael Paulsen, Stephen Ward and Ray Salazar; Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Recording Secretary Jill Norlander. The following individuals were present: Tom Stokes (Brenshell Construction); Chuck Alcon ( Alcon Associates); Barb Flug (5251 Sulgrove Rd); Meredith Brandt (3367 Warner La); B. Amidon (1909 Lakeside La) 3. BOARD OF APPEALS CASE #10 -08 ZONING AMENDMENT FOR BETHEL CHURCH PROPERTY •` 2116 COMMERCE BLVD APPLICANT: CITY OF MOUND In 2002/2003 there were zoning changes enacted for consistency with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. The Bethel United Methodist property adjacent to Commerce Boulevard was rezoned to B -1 from R -1A. The church has requested the zoning be changed back to residential because of the way the parcel would be treated with regard to application of the special assessment policy for commercially zoned property. A discussion ensued regarding the various churches in the area and the reasons behind the zoning as it exists. Salazar felt that Our Lady of the Lake and the Free Church are no more or less commercial than Bethel Methodist and they are remaining commercially zoned. Smith said the difference lies in that the Free Church and OLL existed as commercially zoned properties and were not changed as a result of a City initiated action as was Bethel. In addition, we are responding to a request from a property owner. If the other churches want to entertain a change in zoning they should get in touch with the City. Michael suggested that the Free Church zoning ought to be looked at as part of the City's forthcoming review of the zoning classifications resulting from the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan because its situation is very similar. • -1164- Planning Commission Minutes May 4, 2010 MOTION by Paulsen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the rezoning • to R -3 Multi - Family Residential. MOTION carried. Voting for: Ward, Johnson, Michael, Glister, and Paulsen; Voting against: Salazar Salazar indicated the reason for his vote is fairness, consistency in classifications, and he thinks it is clearly B -1. �j • -1165- 5341 Maywood Road City of Mound Mound, MN 55364 Planning and Building (952) 472 -0604 Dep Planning Report TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 29, 2010 SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to Zoning Map — Bethel Methodist Church, 2116 Commerce Boulevard APPLICANT: City of Mound SUMMARY. The Planning Commission will review an application submitted on behalf of the City of Mound to consider a proposed amendment to the Mound Zoning Map to rezone the portion(s) of the Bethel Methodist Church located at 2116 Commerce Boulevard currently zoned B -1 Central Business District to R -3 Multiple Family Residential. REVIEW PROCEDURE. Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd. 3 states that no zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the • planning agency or by the governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published at least (10) days prior to the hearing date. City Code Chapter 129.35 (b) (1) also requires that any proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission for review and must not be acted upon until it has received the Planning Commission's recommendation. As of this date, no public hearing has been scheduled. DISCUSSION. Site /Property Background Information • Following approval of the 2002 Comprehensive Plan, the Bethel "church parcels" at 2116 Commerce Boulevard were rezoned for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Bethel "parsonage /open space" parcel located at 2116 Fern Lane was rezoned from R -1A to R -3 Medium Density Residential. The zoning amendment review process began in 2002; the effective date of the zoning amendments was July 20, 2003. • -1166- • • A waiver of platting request for lot rearrangement was approved by the City Council in May 2003 which was in advance of the City Council's approval of the zoning amendments for the 2116 Commerce and 2117 Fern Lane parcels. The pre -May 2003 parcels were identified as follows: 13- 117 -24 -32 -0128 13- 117 -24 -32 -0127 13- 117 -24 -32 -0126 13- 117 -24 -32 -0123 • An informal diagram depicting the pre /post May 2003 lot arrangement(s) of the 2116 Commerce and 2117 Fern Lane parcels has been provided and also shows current zoning classifications of B -1 and R -3 of the subject parcels. With regard to the boundary locations of the B -1 and R -3 of the Bethel parcel(s), zoning classifications generally extends to the middle of a road. The subject block includes a road which was formerly vacated (Document No. 3472812). • Following the 2003 rezoning action(s), the "church /parking lot" portion is zoned B -1, the "open space" portion of the Bethel Church parcel (SE corner) is zoned R -3 and the 2117 Fern Lane which includes the church parsonage is zoned R -3. • • perhaps While erha s not pertinent to the current request, the 2002 -2003 public hearing notice for rezoning listed the "current" zoning as R -1 for both the 2116 Commerce Boulevard and 2117 Fern Lane parcels; the historical card file in the Planning Department showed the zoning for both addresses as R-1 A. Rezoning Reguest Review • As members may recall, the proposed action to rezone the Bethel property to B -1 was initiated by the City of Mound as part of the implementation of the former Comprehensive Plan in 2002 -2003. Subsequently, the land use change of the Bethel church parcel from residential to commercial use altered how the parcel would be treated with regard to application of the City's special assessment policy for zoning classifications (residential vs. commercial). • A copy of a letter on behalf of Bethel Methodist Church dated August 24, 2009 regarding the 2002 -2003 zoning action included a request to return the property to its original residential zoning. Members are advised that the Comprehensive Plan Update guides the Bethel church property as "Public /Institutional" which includes churches. Since the City does not have a "Public /Institutional" type of zoning district, the appropriate zoning district for a property guided for the Public /Institutional land use category can differ based on the context of the particular property. 2 -1167- • Members may recall that the Planning Commission, at its September 1, 2009 •; meeting, waived the survey /site plan requirements for the proposed rezoning request for Bethel church. • The rezoning request process was initially started last Fall but was deferred by the City until such time as the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update process was completed following issues raised by the Metropolitan Council (see attached letter). Members are advised that the Metropolitan Council approved Mound's plan update on October 28, 2009, which was followed by formal adoption of the 2030 plan update by the City Council on March 9, 2010. • In the opinion of HKGI, the City's planning consultant, the R -1A Single - Family Residential zoning category is not preferred due to the parcel's proximity to non- residential uses in the vicinity. Consequently, it is Staffs position that the subject property should rezoned to R -3 Multiple Family Residential. The church would be a lawful use under that classification and no new conditional use permit would be required. More importantly, R -3 classification allows for the same treatment as the R -1A zoning category with regard to special assessments. As a result, the primary object of this exercise would be realized and the proposed rezoning action would be consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan and compatible with adjacent uses. • The requested rezoning action is supported by Staff including the City Manager, • Public Works Director and City Attorney. • The rezoning request was forwarded to the Metropolitan Council; no objections were received. • If the proposed rezoning is approved, the entire block owned and maintained by Bethel Methodist Church will be zoned R -3. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of the proposed rezoning request to change the zoning classification of the Bethel Methodist Church property currently zoned B -1 Central Business District to R -3 Multiple Family Residential. Staff finds the proposed rezoning action to be consistent with the Future Land Use Map for the subject area. • -1168- r nAAL • 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952472 -0600 FAX 952472 -0620 ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No. c — t I City Council Date ` Planning Commission Date: rhAl L it Applicant I Name Info Address or print Please Email LA)C)r,\- '_Q�_, &PML�4,6 Phone Home (c(51 I `V 6L Work Fax • FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING It is requested that Section 350:' of the Mound Zoning Ordinance be amended as follows: Reason for amendment • Zoning Amendment Information (1/2012010) Page 4 of 5 -1169- FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP / ZONING. DISTRICT COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING It is requested that the property de re low and shown on a attached site plan be rezoned • ,! from zone to zone Address & Address Legal of Subject Lot Block Property Addition PIN Current Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 2 B3 (Circle one) Owner of Subject Site Nam Email Address Phone Home _ _�2 ' ` Wo � Fax Present Use of 111 Property Reason for Q R : S� � (e - o1–P 5o - 'O w o� \ 1 kS � t r ) at t Amendment k OwY • -\ �G'V1S► I certify that all of the statements above and stateme is contained i ny required papers or plans to b f n submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided ands that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application."': consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of osting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant's Signatur Owner's Signatur Zoning Amendment Information (1/20/2010) Page 5 of 5 Date I — xLo Date -1170- • 2116 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 95 shod Ist Ch u rch rooted with love -r fueled le faith August 24, 2009 Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Ms. Smith and Mr. Carlton, • Thank you for meeting with us last month regarding the status of our assessments and zoning classification. We appreciate all your efforts and ideas. Per our meeting on July 17th we understand that the city of Mound is willing to rezone our property back to its original zoning classification of residential. We concur that this zoning classification better suites the needs of our church and that this property has historically been zoned residential. Please let us know what the next steps will be and what we need to do in order to accomplish this task. Again, thank you for all your help and assistance on this matter. Respectfully, Rev. Cheryl M. Williams Pastor 'gym cc: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Ron Carlson, Bethel UMC Board of Trustees Chairperson Kenneth Kingren, Bethel UMC Church Council Chairperson • ! 1 -1171- - Bethel Methodist Church 211 Commerce Blvd _ , i� - - - l , ' I V'� OF I i LC 01 7k &,A.= 0 i �0, Hennepin County Property Map Print Page 1 of I | --------- ---------- ----- Hennepin County Property Map - Tax Year: 2009 The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The Information on this page should be used for reference purposes onlyJ Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. _----___ - . -- - ,_- ....... -__-___- +_°°^ 9 370 `^�`/~ / � � � � � lei ff Seilcted Parcel Data Date Printed: 8/2 09 2:43:40 PM I ID. 13-117-24-32-0177 1�1]1 Parce Current Parcel Date: 8 /2009 Owner Name: BETHEL METH CHURCH OF MOUND Parcel Address: 2116 COMMERCE BLVD, MOUND, MN 55364 Property Type: COMMERCIAL Sale Price: .00 Homestead: NON-HOMESTEAD Sale Date: Area (sqft): 111148 Sale Code: Area (acres): 2.55 M rket Total: $0.00 Tax Total: $0.00 hftpf/gim or* l3ll724320177 0/27/2009 • 00-0 4a MI VI • m iw Ll Metropolitan Council September 9, 2009 Sarah J. Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Bethel United Methodist Church — Rezoning Dear Ms. Smith: Thank you for sending the Council a copy of the Land Use Application Routing and Comment and Notification Form for the proposed Bethel United Methodist Church — Rezoning. The Council does not normally review or comment on rezonings, but focuses on comprehensive plans and comprehensive plan amendments (CPAs). However, Council staff offers the following comments on the proposed rezoning for your consideration. �j The Metropolitan Land Planning Act (MLPA), specifically Minn. Stat. § 473.865, Subdivision 2, says in part that a "local government unit shall not adopt any official control... which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan...." The Council's copy of Mound's 2000 comprehensive land use plan shows the Bethel property as partially "auto- destination" business and mixed use and the remainder as "medium density residential." The 2002 -2003 rezoning of the property to B -1 and R -3, described in the material submitted, was intended to and did in fact bring the zoning of the property into consistency with the City's 2000 land use plan. The proposed rezoning does not appear to be consistent with the City's 2000 land use plan and would therefore appear to be inconsistent with the language in the state statute noted above. If this is true, then the rezoning needs to follow a reguiding of &-e land use for the Bethel property. Generally, a reguiding can be accomplished in two ways: the City could propose to amended its 2000 land use plan or the City could submit a new comprehensive plan update (Update) with the land use of the Bethel property shown as something consistent with the proposed zoning. The City is not proposing to amend its 2000 comprehensive land use plan, which in any case would not be permitted by the Council, which in June 2008 took action to prohibit amendments to earlier comprehensive plans after December 31, 2008. www.metrocouncil.org • 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 s TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer -1176- Sarah J. Smith Community Development Director September 9, 2009 Page 2 The City's other option for achieving consistency via a new comprehensive plan update, such as the 2008 comprehensive plan submittal, is the only viable option at this time. However, the draft Update has not been finally adopted by the City and cannot be finally adopted until the Metropolitan Council has completed its review and taken action on the City's Update. At the present time, the Council's review of the Mound 2008 Update is on hold because the Update as submitted was found incomplete on January 14, 2009 for land use, plan implementation and surface water management. After receipt of supplemental materials on May 7, the Update was found still incomplete for plan implementation and the suspension of the Council's review was continued on May 22, 2009. After new supplemental information relative to plan implementation is received and evaluated, and staff finds the Update complete, the Council's review process will be restarted. If such material was received in the next week or so, it may be possible for the Council to complete its review by the end of October. If you have any questions about the comments in this letter or about the additional materials needed to make the City's Update complete, please call Jim Uttley, Principal Reviewer, at 651- • 602 -1361. Sincerely, Phyllis Hanson, Manager Local Planning Assistance CC: Kandis M. Hanson, City Manager Bob McPariin, Metropolitan Council District 3 Jim Uttley, Sector Representative Cheryl Olson, Referrals Coordinator N. ICommDevILPAICommunitieslMounaUettersWound 2009 CPU20438- 1- Bethel.doc • -1177- CITY OF MOUND • NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING The City of Mound holds a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with the og_al of reducing pollutant concentrations to surface waters As required, the City has prepared a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and annually solicits public input on the Plan. Citizens are invited to participate in this year's annual meeting and to report general concerns regarding the SWPPP or specific information on illicit discharges within the community. Citizens have the opportunity to come to the meeting and express concerns orally or submit concerns in writing prior to the meeting. The City must consider citizen input and make appropriate adjustments to the SWPPP prior to submitting its annual report to the MPCA. The meeting will be held as part of a regularly scheduled council meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 8, 2010. The council agenda will be available from the City or the City's website prior to the meeting date. The public is encouraged to submit written comments /concerns on the SWPPP by May 31, 2010 to City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364. A copy of the SWPPP is available for review at City Hall. For more information, contact the City at 952- 472 -0615. • Published in The Laker on May 8, 2010 Posted April 26, 2010 CJ -1178- • MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer. DATE: June 2, 2010 SUBJECT: 2009 Annual Report — Mound Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) What is the SWPPP As required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES), State statute requires that cities with populations in excess of 10,000, or 5,000 if discharging to one or more impaired waters, must obtain coverage under the state's General Permit for storm water discharge. The city of Mound was required to apply for Permit coverage in 2003, with revisions in 2006. The city is currently covered under the General Permit until its expiration in June, 2011. •'` In summary, the intent of the NPDES Phase II program is to encourage and require municipalities to reduce or control the amount of stormwater runoff both in the form of water quality and rate control. SWPPP Key Components There are six (6) minimum control measures (MCMs) that must be included in the SWPPP, which are identified as follows: • Public education and outreach • Public participation • Illicit discharge, detection, and elimination • Construction site runoff control • Post - construction site runoff control • Pollution prevention / good housekeeping Each control measure is achieved through the establishment and implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs), which are generally described as practices and activities that prevent or reduce the pollution of surface water. • Pagel of 3 -1179- 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200, Chaska, MN 55318 Phone: (952) 448 -8838 • Fax: (952) 448 -8805 Annual Report and Meeting • An p g The SWPPP requires the submittal of an annual report to the MPCA as well as the sponsoring of an annual meeting to allow for public comment on the SWPPP. Public notice regarding the annual meeting must be published at least one (1) month in advance and the SWPPP must be made available for public viewing. Members of the City Council are advised that the meeting notice was Laker for publication on May 8th fulfilling the notification requirements, and the SWPPP has been publicly available at City Hall. How We Did - 2009 Summary Staff is pleased to report that several important components aiding in the reduction and minimization of stormwater pollution have been continued and/or added. These measures include, but are not limited to, the following: • Stormwater permitting regulations / monitoring / enforcement • Formalized site plan and departmental review process • Continuing Education for employees • Continuing education of the public through the City website and newsletter. • Continued public agency relationships (i.e. Minnehaha Creek Watershed •' District, DNR, etc.) • A higher level of public awareness and concern regarding stormwater issues. • Increased employee awareness of stormwater issues. Additionally, the City maintains an inventory of informational materials regarding stormwater techniques that are available to the public. Goals / Issues for 2010 Perhaps the biggest constraint to the SWPPP compliance program is the availability of adequate funding to undertake capital projects or media campaigns. Additionally, the ability of the City to dedicate resources and Staff time to a large -scale SWPPP program is not realistic. However, the ability to gradually promote and expand the mission of the SWPPP is within the City's means. For example: • Establish inspection procedure for illicit discharge. • Improved record keeping, of inspections and observations. • Improved awareness by employees of what to look for in illicit discharges. • Page 2 of 3 H:\ MOUN\ C12392WCouncil- memo_2010- Alteroate.doc -1180- I* • Continued Cooperation and/or partnerships with other public agencies (Le, MCWL), local school districts, etc.) to promote and expand our informational and project efforts. • Staff presentations to local groups and organizations to promote and Provide information about the S WPPP. Additional Comments A full -copy of the SWPPP is.on file at City Hall and available for viewing during regular established office hours at City Hall. Copies will be provided upon request and can be obtained by .contacting Sarah Smith. Staff welcomes any comments or questions. ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR ACTION Meeting Date: 06/03/10 Business Item: New Item Number: Division: Administration Originating Source: Boe Carlson, Associate Superintendent Agenda Item: Dakota Rail Regional Trail: Parking /Bathroom Recommended Action NO ACTION REQUIRED: THIS ITEM IS FOR INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION. The following information was prepared by Boe Carlson, Associate Superintendent of the Division of Administration. Background As the Dakota Rail Regional trail approaches one year of operation staff continues to work on implementation of the Dakota Rail Trail Design Development. Staff has been working with communities to address needs based on trail use patterns. Two concerns that have been raised are parking and bathrooms. Parking The Dakota Rail Trail Design Development Plan identified an allocation of up to six parking spaces in each city along the corridor. There were two cities interested in the development of additional parking facilities where this could not be accommodated: Orono and Spring Park. Staff has subsequently worked with the cities of Orono and Spring Park to develop a parking plan to identify potential locations where parking could be provided. In Spring Park, one location identified was the Spring Park City Hall, adding some additional trail parking to the existing lot. The city of Spring Park is agreeable to this location and is interested in further analysis to develop a design and cost estimate. Parking options were also presented to the City of Orono. However, they are not ready to move forward with a recommendation at this time and would like some further analysis of additional locations. Funding in the amount of $300,000 was included in the 2010 Asset management Program for small projects that may arise throughout the year. Staff is proposing to tap this funding source to implement the smaller parking solutions envisioned in Spring Park and Orono. If the Board authorizes staff to continue to look at parking solutions, a project can be designed and implemented. r� • Bathrooms In surveys that were conducted in 2009, the number one suggested improvement to the • trail was providing bathrooms. Staff has worked with the cities to identify public locations -1182- along the trail where bathrooms and water are available such as Wayzata Beach and St. • Bonifacious City Hall. In addition, staff has been working with the City of Mound which is interested in renovating a historic well house near the Mound transit center for use as a public restroom. The City of Mound is seeking the Park Districts assistance in completing this project [Reference No. 11 . It is estimated that the Park District's portion of the renovation would be approximately $45,000, which could also be funded from the 2010 Asset Management Program. City staff will be present to provide further details about the project. • i r� -1183- Reference No. - 1 • December 22, 2009 Mr. $oe Carlson Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium L,anr North, Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 Re: Use of Mound Historic Wellhouse as Public Restrooms Dear Boe, The City of Mound is interested in completing the renovation of the historic wellhouse in the City for use as a public restroom. The wellhouse was recently moved to the area • between the transit center and the Dakota Regional Trail. The exterior renovations have been completed and the interior is proposed to be used as public restrooms for transit and trail users. The exterior renovations included a new roof windows, doors and brick tuckpointong and painting. The interior is ready for conversion to restrooms as the utilities have been brought into the building pad. In order to complete the interior work on the restrooms the City is asking the Three Rivers Park District to assist the City by participating in the project design and construction costs. it is estimated the interior will cost approximately $90,000 including architectural fees. Your assistance on this project would be greatly appreciated and we are available to discuss this project more at your convenience. Sincerely Kandis Hanson City Manager • -1184- • PUBLIC WORKS DEPT VEHICLE TAKE HOME USAGE Division Vehicles Taken Home Miles Driven one Way Both Ways #1205 1 1.38 2.76 #308 1 1.52 3.04 TOTAL 2 2.9 5.8 Updated 5 -13 -2010 -1185- CITY OF MOUND - Bolton & Menk, Inc., ENGINEERING PROJECT STATUS 0 June 3, 2010 I. 2008 Projects to be completed in 2010 A. 2008 Street Improvement Project: final payment to S.M. Hentges & Sons will be processed as soon as the common excavation payment amount issue is resolved. There are a few new punch list items that will be completed as warranty work. B. Auditors Road Street Extension to CSAH 15 (Shoreline Drive): the contractor, Ramsey Excavating, has a few punch list items to complete and then final payment will be processed contingent on receipt of required paperwork. It has been very difficult trying to obtain the necessary closure items from the contractor. An on -site meeting is scheduled for June 3 rd to resolve the punch list items. C. 2008 Storm Drainage Improvements: the contractor, Widmer Construction, has completed the project. The replacement of dead plantings, with trees, at the Basswood/Noble pond was completed last fall. The area has recently been mowed and a prairie type grass will be planted in the near future. After this • work is completed, final payment will then be processed contingent on receipt of required paperwork II. 2009 Projects to be completed in 2010 A. 2009 Street, Utility and Lift Station Improvement Project: a contract in the amount of $4,384,788.34 was awarded to GMH Asphalt Corporation on April 28, 2009. The contractor is currently working on punch list items. Upon completion of these items, the final layer of asphalt will be placed. This paving work is anticipated for later this month. B. City Street Light Replacement: a proposal for federal Economic Stimulus Package funding was submitted in March 2009 for replacement of the City's street lights on County Roads 110 and 15. The City was informed that the project had been approved and awarded a grant totaling $630,000. WSB consulting is the engineer on this project. A contract was awarded to Eagan Companies on March 23, 2010 in the base bid amount of $919,019.50. On May 11, 2010, a Supplemental Agreement was approved which added • -1186- • $91,267.52 for a new total contract amount of $1,001,286.52. A preconstruction meeting was held on May 25 and work will soon commence. C. Surface Water Management: this is an ongoing effort which includes updating the City's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP), the annual review and update of the City's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and assisting city staff in compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II Permit. The SWMP was approved by the MCWD Board on June 18, 2009. Scheduled City maintenance of drainage facilities is now required and must be documented. MCWD proposed rules revisions, Rule D ( Wetland Protection) and Rule F ( Shoreline and Streambank Stabilization) have been reviewed and comments submitted in late April. III. 2010 Projects A. 2010 Seal Coat and Crack Seal Project: A contract was awarded on May 11, 2010 to Precision Sealcoating in the amount of $10,000 for sealing cracks in the Three Points area, Langdon Bay area and the South Highland area. A preconstruction meeting was held on June 3, 2010 and work is scheduled to commence immediately after this meeting. A contractor was also awarded on May 11th to Allied Blacktop in the amount of $83,644.00 to seal coat all • streets in the Three Points Area. This work is anticipated to occur in mid -July. B. 2010 Lift Station Improvements: the Council received the Engineering Report on May 11, 2010 and authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for four lift station replacements, LS E2 (4948 Bartlett Blvd.), LS E3 (2649 Wilshire Blvd.), LS D4 (4791 Northern Rd.) and LS B1 ( 2990 Highland Blvd.). The project will be bid with LS B1 as an alternate depending on the low bid amount. • -1187- James Wisker Planner Wednesday, May 26, 2010 • 0 • Brief review rulemakitng process • Summary of January 2010 comments • Changes made by Board in response to January 2010 com ments • Additional comments received April 12, 2010 • Recommended edits to shoreline and wetland rule based on April 12, 2010 comments ,. duality ($f Wtkt+ar; t uat r r�# t f _ , Wednesday, May 26, 2010 0 2007- Performed extensive sta keholder outreach: mayors, city staff, planning commissions, HOA's, advocacy groups, landscapers, contractors, developers, builders, engineers, 2006 applicants 0 Developed 2 stakeholder committees April 2007 - Kick Off meeting with both committees • 2008- Committee meetings to discuss policy Board meetings to review • 2009 Drafted rule language /Board Review �It , ,, .� Wednesday, May 26, 2010 0 • • 0 0 0 r �^am • Jan. 201 Q - End of 45 day public comment period • Feb. 2010 - Board review of comments received Board changes applied to rules Presented to Lake Minnetonka Mayors Mar. 2010 - Co nity /TAC / RMTF Info. Meeting Released for additional comment * April 12, 2010 - End of additional comment period aantV of' Water,. quallty oaf Wednesday, May 26, 2010 N • Public beaches • Ripra,p in wetlands = wetland fill • Riprap in floodplain = floodplain fill • Erosion calculation work sheet • Maintenance of existing riprap projects County maintained channels, red rocked shoreline • Limiting vegetation removal on naturalized shorelines Wednesday, May 26, 2010 0 0 0 0 • • Maintenance of riprap "shall" incorporate vegetation if feasible. • Shorelines w/o riprap required to use erosion calculation. Determines if High, Medium or Low energy I W • Removal of existing native vegetation is restricted to outside a 30 foot access corridor. • Flexibility for public beaches 77 7`°�.�""`; 7, 7 77�� Wednesday, May 26, 2010 lit 4 0 C- Erosion intensity worksheet doesn't accurately represent boat Minnetonka. * Access corridors should only apply where native vegetation exists ,es on A • Change "shall" to "recommend" for inclusion of native plants in riprap maintenance • Make shoreline bioengineering voluntary • Eliminate all access corridor provisions • Details for shorelines are too complicated and onerous Wednesday, May 26, 2010 • 0 0 • Erosion iT►tensity worksheet has been revised. Used as gudan e. 1 a - • Access corridor language should a pply where native vegetation exists (with or without riprap) • Change language to "recommend" vegetation be included into riprap maintenance projects • Simplify maintenance plan requirements p to ing a #ity of .W��r, t�ltty b� l�t� x i j'4w� + Wednesday, May 26, 2010 • Buffer widths too large • Single family homes • Signage requirements • Excavation in wetland types not covered by WCA • Monitoring and maintenance requirements • Wetland mitigation excessive fa Wednesday, May 26, 2010 • • • • • • • Standard mitigation ratios, mitigation within MCWD • Buffers adjusted down based on soil and slope • Buffers further reduced through creative approaches • Buffers averaging allowed • Buffer area reduced if larger than wetland area • Newly established buffers require monitoring and maintenance Wednesday, May 26, 2010 S A b • Wetland buffers are too large consider 50' • No change to wetland buffer requirements • Allow homeowners to access lake through riparian wetland buffers • Redefine road reconstruction to focus on recon not resurfacing • Define single family homes in accordance with statute 462.357 • Ensure buffer area does not exceed wetland area • Concern that MCWD buffer bank will impact private market • Large wetland complexes may have multiple functional units • MCWD should provide signs at cost or free • MCWD should . itoring Ctports Wednesday, May 26, 2010 • 0 0 0 • No change to buffer widths based on available flexibility • include provision similar to shoreline rule allowing access corridor to lake • Reword road reconstruction definition in accordance with comments Single family homes • Ensure wetland buffer area does not exceed wetland area • MCW'D should provide signs at cost • MCW`D should provide option of performing post construction monitoring • Require that mitigation credits be sought privately before MCWD bank • Buffer averaging allowed due to demonstrated site constraints • Provide flexibility for excavation for storm sewer outfalls • incorporate guidance on calculating soil and slope • Incorporate list of practices that can be employed to reduce buffer width • Wetland complex s is v weanesaay, may zb, zuiv D us swn /t�uests I I� N O O Wednesday, May 26, 2010 • • • MINUTES ` MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 4, 2010 1. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Michael welcomed the public and called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Those present: Chair Geoff Michael; Commissioners: Becky Glister, Grant Johnson, Michael Paulsen, Stephen Ward and Ray Salazar; Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Recording Secretary Jill Norlander. The following individuals were present: Tom Stokes (Brenshell Construction); Chuck Alcon ( Alcon Associates); Barb Flug (5251 Sulgrove Rd); Meredith Brandt (3367 Warner La); B. Amidon (1909 Lakeside La) 3. APPROVE AGENDA WITH ANY AMENDMENTS • MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Glister, to approve the agenda as proposed. MOTION carried unanimously. 4. APPROVAL OF APRIL 6, 2010 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Salazar, second by Ward, to approve the minutes of the April 6, 2010 Planning Commission meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. Michael abstained. 5. BOARD OF APPEALS a. PLANNING CASE NOS. 10 -02, 03 & 04 WAIVER OF PLATTING /BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT/VARIANCES 5248 SULGROVE LANE BRENSHELL CONSTRUCTION The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property into 4 building lots. The property was originally platted as seven lots. There is an existing house, which will be remodeled, as well as a detached garage that will be removed as part of this project. The property is proposed to be divided on existing lot lines under the waiver of platting provisions with subsequent boundary adjustments to insure conformance • with minimum lot size. There is a rear yard setback variance on Lot 4 (the lot with the existing house) and a corner lot street side setback variance on the same lot. Smith -1201- Planning Commission Minutes May 4, 2010 noted that the City Council will be considering an amendment to the City Code at its May 11 th meeting which, if approved, would eliminate the need for the corner lot • street side setback variance as the lot would be in conformance with City Code. Chuck Alcon ( Alcon Associates) confirmed that all assessments and taxes have been paid and /or are current. Tom Stokes (property owner; Brenshell Construction) said their goal is to build a quality, affordable house, similar to the recent construction on Waterbury, Dundee, Kildare and improve the neighborhood. In response to the question of the impact of the waiver of platting /minor boundary adjustment process versus a major subdivision process, Stokes noted that the additional 10% hardcover allowed through the waiver of platting /minor boundary adjustment process makes a big difference on these lots. In addition, the existing house is oriented towards Sulgrove making the requested variances logical. Glister asked if the new houses would be built conforming. Stokes indicated that they would. Salazar asked if the new homes would be 1 or 2 story. Stokes said they may be either depending on the customer. Barb Flug (5251 Sulgrove) — Expressed dismay at the 4 -home plan. She thought the very best plan would be 2 houses. • Meredith Brandt (3367 Warner) state that there are a dozen homes affected by the quality of this piece of land. She sees the Commission tripping over itself with a laundry list of variances and lot line adjustments to approve the 4 -home plan that is materially detrimental to the neighborhood. She believes this would be contrary to the code as it does not impose an undue hardship to the owner; it will be materially detrimental to the surrounding homes; it will not be in harmony with the existing neighborhood; and does not constitute a desirable and stable development of this particular area. There is also a drainage issue in front of her home that she believes will increase with the additional hardcover. Michael stated drainage is a primary consideration in new construction. Brandt continued by asking about park dedication fees. Staff commented park dedication fees would be collected as appropriate. Barb Flug indicated that there was, she believes, a ravine that once ran through the property which was filled in. She also believes there is a mold issue in the existing house. Tim Landon (1365 Langwood Dr, Minnetrista and ReMax) stated that Mr. Stokes builds a nice house. In his opinion the proposed development will improve the neighborhood. New homes generally encourage neighbors to clean up and fix up their homes. These houses are the start of a new improvement in the neighborhood to bring back the property values and should help rather than hinder. • -1202- Planning Commission Minutes May 4, 2010 • Stokes addressed drainage concerns. He met with Greg Skinner and Ray Hanson and they suggested that any drainage problem in the street will be corrected when the street reconstruction is done in this area. He also said that the streets in the area are all sized to accommodate the traffic and will not be a concern. Ward asked Tom how he became aware of this property's availability. Tom said he has been in the area for a long time and real estate friends make him aware of opportunities. Smith asked about the property ownership. Tom indicated that the Brandon estate owns the property and Stokes is acting as an agent for her tonight but will act on his own behalf at the Council meeting because he will own it at that time. Michael stated that new development with variances doesn't feel right. He can understand the variance for the corner setback but can't understand using this process so the applicant can retain the lot of record 40% hardcover requirement. Salazar initiated a discussion regarding corner lots and front vs. side setbacks as well as the impact of the lot of record status on hardcover and setbacks. Glister asked about Faulkner's desire for a re -plat rather than a waiver of platting. Trapp and Smith thought he was after a simple procedure. Glister wanted to know if • the only way we could get to 30% hardcover is by major subdivision or can we change the hardcover for this proposal. Smith and Trapp thought it would be hard to layer that on top of any other kind of approval and that a major subdivision would be the only way. Ward thought that the definition of a new subdivision includes major utility construction. Trapp read the major vs. minor subdivision definition from the Code. In this case, it is the number of lots (4) that would trigger the major subdivision. Michael confirmed that this plan meets City Code with Smith. She confirmed that, with the variances, they meet the City Code. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Ward, to recommend Council approve the waiver of platting subject to approval of the 3 variances as recommended by Staff. Discussion Ward confirmed that the other lots in the original plat are lots of record. MOTION carried. Voting for: Salazar, Ward, Johnson, Glister and Paulsen; Voting against: Michael. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Salazar, to recommend Council approve the lot • size variance as recommended by Staff. MOTION carried. Voting for: Salazar, -1203- Planning Commission Minutes May 4, 2010 Ward, Johnson, Glister and Paulsen; Voting against: Michael. MOTION by Johnson, seconded by Paulson, to recommend Council approve the Lot • 4 rear setback variance as requested. MOTION carried. Voting for: Salazar, Ward, Johnson, Glister and Paulsen; Voting against: Michael. MOTION by Ward, seconded by Salazar, to recommend Council approve the corner lot street side setback variance as requested. MOTION carried. Voting for: Salazar, Ward, Johnson, Glister and Paulsen; Voting against: Michael. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Ward, to recommend Council approve the minor boundary adjustment as recommended. MOTION carried. Voting for: Salazar, Ward, Johnson, Glister and Paulsen; Voting against: Michael Michael opinionated about granting variances in newly created lots. CASE #10 -08 ZONING AMENDMENT FOR BETHEL CHURCH PROPERTY 2116 COMMERCE BLVD APPLICANT: CITY OF MOUND In 2002/2003 there were zoning changes enacted for consistency with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan. The Bethel United Methodist property adjacent to Commerce Boulevard was rezoned to B -1 from R -1 A. The church has requested the zoning be changed back to residential because of the • way the parcel would be treated with regard to application of the special assessment policy for commercially zoned property. A discussion ensued regarding the various churches in the area and the reasons behind the zoning as it exists. Salazar felt that Our Lady of the Lake and the Free Church are no more or less commercial than Bethel Methodist and they are remaining commercially zoned. Smith said the difference lies in that the Free Church and OLL existed as commercially zoned properties and were not changed as a result of a City initiated action as was Bethel. In addition, we are responding to a request from a property owner. If the other churches want to entertain a change in zoning they should get in touch with the City. Michael suggested that the Free Church zoning ought to be looked at as part of the City's forthcoming review of the zoning classifications resulting from the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan because its situation is very similar. MOTION by Paulsen, seconded by Johnson, to recommend approval of the rezoning to R -3 Multi - Family Residential. MOTION carried. Voting for: Ward, Johnson, Michael, Glister, and Paulsen; Voting against: Salazar Salazar indicated the reason for his vote is fairness, consistency in classifications, and he thinks it is clearly B -1. • -1204- Planning Commission Minutes May 4, 2010 6. OLD / NEW BUSINESS • a. Initial discussion of exterior storage regulations /next steps • what is a "unit "; • maximum units on a site; • requiring hard surfaces • just start bringing the numbers down; Time to take the baby steps and get this started. Discussion Michael feels there is no chance of anything getting through the Council in an election year. Salazar feels there are supporters out there of reducing the allowable storage. Smith offered to bring back a draft in June for a start. b. Staff / Council liaison update One planning case in process; thanks for joint workshop participation; corner lot setback amendment at next CC meeting; Brighton Blvd parcels — CC recommended interior parcel may be considered for release; Woodlyn Ridge plat is going to CC; CC submitted comments to MCWD regarding rule changes; rezoning matters following comp plan ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Glister to adjourn seconded and carried by affirmation at 9:42 p.m. Chair Geoff Michael Attest, Planning Secretary • -1205- DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, 20 2010 • y, y Present: Vice Chair Mark Drahos, Commissioners Rodney Beystrom, Susan Gardner, Cliff Schmidt, Council Representative David Osmek Absent: Chair Jim Funk Vice Chair Drahos called meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1. Approval of Agenda: MOTION by Gardner to approve agenda as written. SECOND by Osmek. MOTION carried unanimously. 2. Approval of April 15, 2010 Meeting Minutes: MOTION by Schmidt to approve minutes as written. SECOND by Gardner. MOTION carries unanimously. 3. Comments and Suggestions from citizens present: None present 4. Discuss: 2011 Capital Outlay, Budget & Fees Fackler summarized the spreadsheets included in the packet. The Council is requesting a zero budget increase for 2011. The fund balance and the expense of rip rap projects were discussed. Osmek stated a fund balance between 50 -80K is good. Osmek stated he foresees dock and slip fees will go back up in 2011 by $50.00 as the $50.00 fee decrease was for 2010 only. 5. Discuss: Rip Rap — 4857 and 4853 Island View Drive Fackler summarized quotes received to riprap 90 lineal feet on Devon Commons. MOTION by Osmek to approve to rip rap 90 lineal feet of shoreline at 4857 and 4853 Island View Drive with Minnetonka Portable Dredge as the contractor. SECOND by Gardner. MOTION carries unanimously. 6. Discuss: Rip Rap — Dreamwood Commons -1206- Fackler stated he submitted a fast track permit to MCWD, but hasn't heard back • from them. Dreamwood rip rap would be done over a three year period, and could possibly start this year. Discussion followed. MOTION by Osmek to recommend an expenditure of up to $50,000 for rip rap in Dreamwood, with the possibility of the work beginning this fall. SECOND by Beystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. 7. Review: Calendar Commission is not scheduled to meet in June, July, or August. MOTION by Drahos to accept calendar. SECOND by Beystrom. MOTION carried unanimously. 8. Reports: Council Representative Osmek commented on the MCWD shoreline rules. Regarding budget, the council's goal is a 0 percent levy increase and would also like to reduce franchise fees. Park Superintendent asked Hoff to summarize the 2010 dock application process. All docks and slips are rented. • MOTION to adjourn by Osmek. SECOND by Gardner. Meeting adjourned at 7:56 p.m. • -1207- Minnesota hapter American - Planning Association Merit Award Albersman & Armstrong, Ltd. was retained by Walker Parking Consult- ants' Minneapolis office to provide architectural design services for this new Transit Center in Mound, Minnesota. Located near the shores of historic Lake Minnetonka, this multi - modal facility is situated in the core business area of the City of Mound and is part of a larger redevelopment effort based on "New Urbanism and Smart Growth" principles referred to as the "Mound Visions Master Plan" adopted in 1991. This original vision plan has been the basis of public policy related to redevelopment for the City of Mound ever since. Its impact on the community will be significant. The facility functions as a Transit Center for commuters who travel by regional bus system to their place of employment in the urban core of Minneapolis and Saint Paul, while the remaining spaces are dedicated to employees and customers of the downtown Mound area. The City has embraced regional goals of connec- tivity through public transit, greenways, and storm water manage- ment. The benefits of intergovernmen- tal cooperation has resulted in fund- ing participation from a variety of gov- ernmental jurisdictions. The vision integrates the commercial interests and infrastructure require- ments into a people friendly space that is environmentally sensitive and cre- ates a project that helps maintain the vitality and character of the City's small town charm as well as many other important aspects that make this project special, unique and a standing v u Lb Ld t Planning. and Urban Design example of innovative planning that brings synergy between the struc- ture and its surroundings. "What was once an underutilized area of blight is now a hub of activity, and an icon for the city and This three - level, $5 million multi - modal transit center not only pro- vides 50 park and ride spaces for commuters, it is also located next to a future light rail line that will serve the metropolitan area and ultimately replace the bus system. The project provides 177 parking spaces for nearby retail and com- -1208- mercial businesses as well as area for a local farmer's market the city is developing on the south side of the structure. A regional bike trail next to the transit center will enable cyclists to transport their bikes and access the metropolitan area's extensive Greenway bike trail system. This project is part of a coopera- tive effort between the City and the MCWD and incorporates unique and innovative storm water man- agement strategies that signifi- cantly exceed the regulatory requirements. The resulting plan removes an estimated 75% of phosphorous from the stormwater. This is a direct and measurable water quality improvement to Lake Minnetonka, which is one of the state's most important natural resources. The project is viewe a model for innovative stormwa . treatment and is already being used as a demonstration site for other developments. nnow i PROJECT NEWS community." Stormwater management includes extensive use of a pervious concrete paving system that allows water to pass through to a sand filtering sys- tem which removes seven common pollutants from run -off water before it hers the subsoil. Excessive storm qater detention is handled via a retention pond fed by a "Pocket Park" which includes a "Rain Garden" that diverts water to. the pond. Landscap- ing and site design services was pro- vided by the Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. The development of the new Mound Transit Center will have a dramatic impact on the urban environment in downtown Mound. The plan not only accommodates current transit and - 3 A parking demands, it integrates exisl ing and future transportation infra structure. It will strengthen existing development in downtown Mouni and spur new development in thi immediate vicinity. What was once ai underutilized area of blight is now; hub of activity and an icon for the Cit and community. ■ Some of the services we provide are: Our Airport Project Experience Airport Landside Master Planning Urban Planning and Design Consolidated Rental Car Facility Planning and Design Functional Design of Parking and Parking Structures Valet Parking and Shuttle Bus Analysis Parking & Rental Car Demand Analysis Economic Feasibility Analysis Parking Rate Studies • Transit Studies Daze 2 1 Rico *Doha, Qatar -1209- A l aN Stormwater management includes extensive use of a pervious concrete paving system that allows water to pass through to a sand filtering sys- tem which removes seven common pollutants from run -off water before it hers the subsoil. Excessive storm qater detention is handled via a retention pond fed by a "Pocket Park" which includes a "Rain Garden" that diverts water to. the pond. Landscap- ing and site design services was pro- vided by the Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. The development of the new Mound Transit Center will have a dramatic impact on the urban environment in downtown Mound. The plan not only accommodates current transit and - 3 A parking demands, it integrates exisl ing and future transportation infra structure. It will strengthen existing development in downtown Mouni and spur new development in thi immediate vicinity. What was once ai underutilized area of blight is now; hub of activity and an icon for the Cit and community. ■ Some of the services we provide are: Our Airport Project Experience Airport Landside Master Planning Urban Planning and Design Consolidated Rental Car Facility Planning and Design Functional Design of Parking and Parking Structures Valet Parking and Shuttle Bus Analysis Parking & Rental Car Demand Analysis Economic Feasibility Analysis Parking Rate Studies • Transit Studies Daze 2 1 Rico *Doha, Qatar -1209- • •