The URL can be used to link to this page

2012-02-14 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA ........ ........ MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2012 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent A ems: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 367 -411 *B. Approve Pay Request No. 7 from GMH Asphalt Corp. in the amount 412 -413 of $84,498.64 for the 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project (PW- 11 -01, 11 -02) *C. Adopt Resolution Awarding Contract for the Island View Drive to 414 -415 Windsor Road Watermain Loop Project *D. Adopt Resolution Approving Public Lands Permit for Tree Removal 416 -426 and Trimming at 2851 Cambridge Lane *E. Requests from Interim Police Chief Dean Mooney 427 -444 (1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Sojourner Project (2) Approve Professional Services Agreement with CornerHouse 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Review /discussion/action on resolution denying variance for 3070 Highland 445 -487 Blvd (PC Case 11 -13) — item tabled at January 24, 2012 meeting 7. Review /discussion with Jeff Schoenwetter of JMS Custom Homes and Tim 488 -494 Hartman regarding request for use of Chapter 429 financing for infrastructure improvements in Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision including any required action PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 8. Approve minutes of January 24, 2012 regular meeting 495 -499 9. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Reports: LMCD Report on herbicide treatments 500 C. Minutes: Docks & Commons Commission — 1/19/12 501 -503 D. Correspondence: 10. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www.cityofmound.com. City of Mound Claims as of 02 -14 -12 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2011 0120CRCARD $ 995.50 2011 2011CITYAP3 $ 12,505.17 2011 2011CITYAP4 $ 168,481.84 2011 2011CITYAP5 $ 74,840.45 2012 0120ELAN $ 111.47 2012 0127CITYMAN $ 3,570.93 2012 0208CITYMAN $ 659.56 2012 021412CITY $ 130,617.62 2012 021412CITY2 $ 245,213.61 TOTAL CLAIMS $ 636,996.15 -367- _ CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2011 Batch Name 0120CRCARD Payment Computer Dollar Amt $995.50 Posted Refer 1 ELAN CREDIT CARD _ AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms MIDWEST WORKWEAR INC. COVERALLS FOR D. KOSKELA Invoice 01202012 12/28/2011 AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs CREDIT DREAMSCAPE OUTDOOR LIVING & GARDEN ORDER NOT IN STOCK Invoice 01202012 12/5/2011 AP Payment E 101 - 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic WWW.IANDI.COM WEBSITE HOSTING PD Invoice 01202012 12/28/2011 AP Payment E 101 - 41110 -430 Miscellaneous GALLERY NAVERY FRAMING "BEST PLACE TO RAISE KIDS IN MN" Invoice 01202012 12/20/2011 AP Payment E 101 - 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic INET 7 INTERNET SERVICES THRU DEC 18 2011 Invoice 01202012 12/19/2011 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft GOOGLE REAWNC R. HANSON'S PHONE TO SPEAK W /SCADA Invoice 01202012 12/14/2011 Project SA -2 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies WALGREENS FIRST AID SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS Invoice 01202012 12/12/2011 Project SA -2 AP Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells THE CELLULAR CONNECTION PHONE CASE /HOLSTER R. HANSON Invoice 01202012 12/12/2011 Project SA -2 AP Payment E 101 -45200 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft HP HOME STORE PRINTER CABLE PARKS SHOP Invoice 01202012 12/29/2011 AP Payment E 101 - 45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa DEMCOM CO. DISPOSAL OF OLD TIMBERS Invoice 01202012 12/28/2011 AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -200 Office Supplies HP HOME STORE LASER PRINTER CARTRIDGES Invoice 01202012 12/30/2011 AP Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies BST BUY 32" FLAT SCREEN TV, 19" FLAT SCREEN TV OPEN BOX & PROTECTION PLANS Invoice 01202012 12/30/2011 PO 23357 AP Payment E 222 -42260 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 01202012 12/16/2011 AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 01202012 12/14/2011 AP Payment E 101 - 41310 -434 Conference & Training STEELCASEINC.KEYS ELECTION REDISTRICTING MTG PARKING R.HANSON Project SA -2 ELECTION REDISTRICTING MTG PARKING B. RITTER Invoice 01202012 12/14/2011 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Due 0 Accounts Payable 20200 Total 02/01/12 2:37 PM Page 1 $99.99 - $296.46 $35.97 $91.20 $53.80 $9.99 $145.78 $38.59 $27.87 $78.48 $344.10 $348.46 $10.73 $3.50 $3.50 $995.50 CITY OF MOUND 02/01/12 2:37 PM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 222 602 Current Period: December 2011 20200 Accounts Payable $438.45 $359.19 $197.86 Pre - Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $995.50 Total $995.50 $995.50 -369- BATCH Total $995.50 _ CITY OF MOUND 01/27/12 9:20 AM Payments Page 1 CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 2011CITYAP3 Payments Current Period: December 2011 User Dollar Amt $12,505.17 Computer Dollar Amt $12,505.17 Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 101 GENERAL FUND $12,505.17 $12,505.17 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $12,505.17 Total $12,505.17 Iciffell $495.51 $495.51 $559.40 $559.40 $10,710.24 $10,710.24 $28.22 $11.80 $40.02 $700.00 $700.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 2 HANSON, KANDIS AP Payment E 101 -41310 -331 Use of personal auto REPLACE LOST CHECK #39556 - 2011 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 5 -19 THRU 12- 31-11 Invoice 012712 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 1/27/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 3 HANSON, KANDIS AP Payment E 101 -41310 -321 Telephone & Cells HOME DSL LINE REIMBURSEMENT JAN THRU DEC 2011 Invoice 012712 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 1/27/2012 Due 12131/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 4 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COMM _ AP Payment E 101 -49840 -300 Professional Srvs 4TH QTR 2011 PEG ACCESS FEE Invoice 012712 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 1/27/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 1 OFFICE DEPOT (POLICE) _ AP Payment E 101 -42110 -200 Office Supplies TAPE CARTRIDGE; BLACK ONWHITE, RETRACTABLE PENS Invoice 590422721001 12/14/2011 PO 23804 AP Payment E 101 -42110 -200 Office Supplies DESK PAD CALENDAR Invoice 590422515001 12/14/2011 PO 23804 Transaction Date 1/27/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 5 VIDEOTRONIX, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance MOVE DVR TO NEW COMPUTER, READDRESS CAMERAS, ASSIST IN MOVING SOFTWARE TO NEW WORK STATION Invoice SVM21109404 12/29/2011 Transaction Date 1/27/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 101 GENERAL FUND $12,505.17 $12,505.17 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $12,505.17 Total $12,505.17 Iciffell $495.51 $495.51 $559.40 $559.40 $10,710.24 $10,710.24 $28.22 $11.80 $40.02 $700.00 $700.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2011 Batch Name 2011CITYAP4 User Dollar Amt $168,481.84 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $168,481.84 $0.00 In Balance Refer 2 MICHELS CORPORATION AP Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #1 & FINAL 2011 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PIN 11 -03 FOR WORK COMPLETED OCT & NOV 2011 Invoice 310651 11/15/2011 Project PW1103 Transaction Date 1/30/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 1 MINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC. AP Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #3 2011 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ. PIN 11 -03 FOR WORK COMPLETED DEC 3RD THRU JAN 6, 2012 Invoice 013012 1/6/2012 Project PW1103 Transaction Date 1/30/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 602 SEWER FUND $168,481.84 $168,481.84 Pre - Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $168,481.84 Total $168,481.84 -371- 01/30/12 3:08 PM Page 1 $129,487.80 $129,487.80 $38,994.04 $38,994.04 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 11:32 AM / / \ Page 1 Payments � ........................... A711i'ZiT i •III>,Is7 Current Period: December 2011 Batch Name 2011CITYAP5 User Dollar Amt $74,840.45 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $74,840.45 $0.00 In Balance Refer 193 BELLBOY CORPORATION AP Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $147.00 Invoice 70660500 -1 10/28/2011 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $147.00 Refer 3 BOYER FORD TRUCKS AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2012 FORD F550 TRUCK $46,404.49 Invoice F22263 1/23/2012 PO 23649 AP Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2012 FORD F550 TRUCK $7,139.15 Invoice F22263 1/23/2012 PO 23649 AP Payment E 675 -49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2012 FORD F550 TRUCK $17,847.88 Invoice F22263 1/23/2012 PO 23649 AP Payment R 101- 48500 -39101 Sales of General Fixe 2004 FORD F450 TRADE IN FOR 2012 FORD - $19,000.00 F550 Invoice F22263 1/23/2012 PO 23649 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $52,391.52 Refer 5 FLAHERTYS HAPPY TYME COMP AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa TOM & JERRY MIX $92.40 Invoice 25726 12/23/2011 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $92.40 Refer 4 INFRA TECH AP Payment E 401 -43101 -500 Capital Outlay FA HIGH PRESSURE CLEANING TO REMOVE $7,140.00 ROOTS & MINERALS ON EASEMENT PIN 11- 01 STREET PROJECT Invoice PR12071 12/30/2011 Project PW1101 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $7,140.00 Refer 6 JUBILEE FOODS AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense COFFEE MATE, KRAUT, PICKLES FOR $18.29 UNITED FIRE FIGHTER MTG & LUNCH 12 -13- 11 Invoice 1002861803 12/13/2011 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $18.29 Refer 6 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN AP Payment E 101 -41600 -300 Professional Srvs LEGAL SERVICES DEC 2011 HRA REVIEW & $93.50 MTG 12 -13 -11 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 AP Payment E 101 -41600 -300 Professional Srvs ADMIN LEGAL SERVICES DEC 2011 $66.00 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 AP Payment E 101 -41600 -314 Legal P/W PUBLIC WORKS LEGAL SERVICES DEC 2011 $366.00 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 AP Payment E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING & INSPECTION LEGAL SERVICES $555.00 DEC 2011 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 AP Payment G 101 -23231 6301 Lynwood #10 -07, Wood WOODLYN RIDGE LEGAL SVCS THRU 12 -31- $312.00 11 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 -372- CITY OF MOUND Payments l .�■wr CITY OF MOUND Current Period: December 2011 AP Payment G 101 -23248 6407 BAY RIDGE RD #11 -12 BAYRIDGE RD LEGAL SVCS THRU 12 -31 -11 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 AP Payment G 101 -23249 3070 HIGHLAND #11 -13 MO 3070 HIGHLAND LEGAL SVCS THRU 12 -31 -11 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 AP Payment E 101 -41600 -300 Professional Srvs EXECUTIVE LEGAL SERVICES DEC 2011 Invoice 106244 1/17/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 5 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA AP Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 12 -19 -11 LIQUOR STORE Invoice 921093102 1/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 86 MNSPECT AP Payment E 101- 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees DEC 2011 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES Invoice 5684 1/6/2012 AP Payment R 101 -42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee DEC 2011 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION /PERMIT FEE CREDIT Invoice 5684 1/6/2012 AP Payment R 101 -42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee NOV 2011 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION /PERMIT FEE CREDIT Invoice 5684 1/6/2012 AP Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments DEC 2011 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION /PERMIT SURCHARGE CREDIT Invoice 5684 1/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total Refer 85 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT, INC AP Payment E 101 - 43100 -500 Capital Outlay FA BLIZZARD POWER PLOW INSTALLED W SNOW DEFLECTOR & LOAD BOOSTER KITS Invoice 21666 1/31/2012 AP Payment E 60149400 -500 Capital Outlay FA BLIZZARD POWER PLOW INSTALLED W SNOW DEFLECTOR & LOAD BOOSTER KITS Invoice 21666 1/31/2012 AP Payment E 675 -49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA BLIZZARD POWER PLOW INSTALLED W SNOW DEFLECTOR & LOAD BOOSTER KITS Invoice 21666 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total -373- 02/09/12 11:32 AM Page 2 $42.00 $81.00 $822.90 $2,338.40 $65.19 $65.19 $5,097.17 - $211.00 - $84.20 - $70.00 $4,731.97 $5,145.19 $791.57 $1,978.92 $7,915.68 1 ................ ...... ... Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 601 WATER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: December 2011 20200 Accounts Payable $39,620.05 $18.29 $7,140.00 $7,930.72 $304.59 $19,826.80 $74,840.45 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $74,840.45 Total $74,840.45 -374- 02/09/12 11:32 AM Page 3 CITY OF MOUND 01/31/12 2:53 PM �,_.._..___....` Payments Page 1 10 -12-1,1411,11 Batch Name 0120ELAN Payments Current Period: January 2012 User Dollar Amt $111.47 Computer Dollar Amt $111.47 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ELAN CREDIT CARD Ck# 052990E 1/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms KOHLS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FACKLER 2012 Invoice 01202012 1/2/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft MALWAREBYTES VIRUS SOFTWARE UPDATE FOR PIN LAPTOP Invoice 01202012 1/2/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies MY CABLEMART.COM WALL MOUNT SWIVEL & TILT ARM BRACKETS FOR TV$ Invoice 01202012 1/2/2012 PO 23356 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $39.99 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $46.53 602 SEWER FUND $24.95 Pre - Written Check $111.47 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $111.47 $111.47 -375- $39.99 $24.95 $46.53 $111.47 CITY OF MOUND 01/26/12 4:14 PM Page 1 Payments y u Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone Current Period: January 2012 $10.06 Batch Name 0127CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $3,570.93 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,570.93 CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 $235.42 $0.00 In Balance Refer 117 CHUCKS EXCAVATING Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 Cash Payment G 101 -23007 Erosion Control Escrow EROSION CONTROL ESCROW REFUND 2033 $1,000.00 ARBOR LANE -376- Invoice 012712 1/24/2012 Transaction Date 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00 Refer 111 FACKLER, JAMES Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 2012 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 012712 1/9/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow 2012 BOOT ALLOWANCE OVERAGE PAID TO $11.42 CITY Invoice 012712 1/9/2012 Transaction Date 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $161.42 Refer 112 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -202 Duplicating and copying TONER & STAPLES FOR 3RD FLOOR $179.55 MAILROOM COPIER C652 Invoice 1351185 1/18/2012 Transaction Date 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $179.55 Refer 115 MINNESOTA, UNIVERSITY OF Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -434 Conference & Training NEW TREE INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION $85.00 WORKSHOP -D. KOSKELA FEB 16 Invoice 022712 1/18/2012 PO 22866 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -434 Conference & Training NEW TREE INSPECTOR CERTIFICATION $85.00 WORKSHOP - B. GUSTAFSON MAY 24 Invoice 022712 1/18/2012 PO 22866 Transaction Date 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $170.00 Refer 113 POSTMASTER Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -322 Postage CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER POSTAGE $776.45 WINTER 2012 EDITION - 5,586 Invoice 012712 1/26/2012 Transaction Date 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $776.45 Refer 114 PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF MN D Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic Well #3 & #8 TIER II REPORT OF $200.00 HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS Invoice 2716000182001 1/17/2012 PO 23657 Transaction Date 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $200.00 Refer 116 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 $34.49 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 $10.06 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 $235.42 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 $222.03 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 -376- CITY OF MOUND I, Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: January 2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -322 Postage CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 101 GENERAL FUND Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 601 WATER FUND Cash Payment E 10145200 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 10141310 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE SERVICE DEC 14 THRU JAN 13 Invoice 2686427129 1/13/2012 Transaction Date 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,895.69 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $81.09 601 WATER FUND $422.03 602 SEWER FUND $172.12 $3,570.93 Pre - Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $3,570.93 Total $3,570.93 -377- 01/26/12 4:14 PM Page 2 $172.12 $22.06 $269.62 $36.62 $81.09 $1,083.51 CITY OF MOUND Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $659.56 Total $659.56 $659.56 -378- 02/08/12 9:40 AM Page 1 $290.00 Total $290.00 $334.56 $35.00 Total $369.56 f Ai \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Batch Name 0208CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $659.56 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $659.56 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 CARVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow CARVER CO. WARRANT #11040124 DESTREICH - CASE 12 -0291 Invoice 020812 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 2 KIVISTO, SCOTT _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -305 Medical Services 2012 SAFETY LENS ALLOWANCE Invoice 020812 2/7/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -305 Medical Services EYE EXAM /EYEWEAR ALLOWANCE Invoice 020812 2/7/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $290.00 602 SEWER FUND $369.56 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $659.56 Total $659.56 $659.56 -378- 02/08/12 9:40 AM Page 1 $290.00 Total $290.00 $334.56 $35.00 Total $369.56 CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 1 �� \\ Payments t......... ...................__._.._._.__ �. CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 021412CITY Payments Current Period: February 2012 User Dollar Amt $130,617.62 Computer Dollar Amt $130,617.62 $0.00 In Balance Refer 7 ABDO EICK AND MEYERS, LLP Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 401 -43101 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/1312012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 670 -49500 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -301 Auditing and Acct'g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS FOR YEAR ENDED 12 -31 -2011 PROGRESS THRU 1 -18 -12 Invoice 287442 1/13/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 8 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY, IN Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs VAC BREAK DOOR WELD, SPRING PINS, END RETAINERS, SEAL VAC Invoice 0131373 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs VAC BREAK DOOR WELD, SEAL RETAINER Invoice 0131367 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 9 AMERICAN MESSAGING Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice D2062026MB 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice D2062026MB 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Refer 10 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 379203005 1/30/2012 PAGING MESSAGING SERVICE FROM 02/01/12 TO 01/31/2013 PAGING MESSAGING SERVICE FROM 02/01/12 TO 01/31/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -379- $793.77 $408.56 $140.08 $175.10 $367.70 $367.70 $560.31 $93.39 $93.39 $3,000.00 $486.37 $141.46 $627.83 $104.15 $104.15 $208.30 $34.20 CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM i \ Payments Page 2 ... .... ..... ...... ........ _. .... ..r...r CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 379203005 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $116.32 Invoice 381202704 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 381202704 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $152.52 Refer 1 ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 12 UNIFORM SHIRTS & EMBROIDERY HWS $395.76 LOGO; R. GUST, J. COLOTTI Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $395.76 Refer 5 BECK, KENNETH Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE MEALS @ HOMELAND $37.50 SECURITY HSEEP TRAINING 1 -10 THRU 1 -12 Invoice 021412 1/24/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.50 Refer 6 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES $75.00 Invoice 86304100 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $23.10 Invoice 86304100 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $98.10 Refer 7 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $50.38 Invoice 71910900 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $395.00 Invoice 71910900 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,458.52 Invoice 71910900 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,430.50 Invoice 71874200 1/23/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,334.40 Refer 11 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCH; CORKSCREWS, SHOT GLASSES $14.40 Invoice 86315600 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $93.30 Invoice 86315600 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $48.68 Invoice 86315600 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $156.38 Refer 13 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.25 Invoice 71936600 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $848.80 Invoice 71959000 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $671.00 Invoice 71936600 1/27/2012 -380- CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM �\ Payments Page 3 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 8 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN E 362 -47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 42194 1/18/2012 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT Invoice 42195 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 42196 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 42197 1/18/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 2 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPOR 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2004B Invoice 7093 12/15/2011 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2004B Invoice 7093 12/15/2011 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2004B Invoice 7093 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 368 -47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2005A Invoice 7094 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2005B Invoice 7098 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 369 - 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2006A Invoice 7097 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2006B Invoice 7092 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2006B Invoice 7092 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2006B Invoice 7092 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 350 -47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2006 TRANSIT Invoice 7102 12/15/2011 10100 10100 Cash Payment E 355 - 46384 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2006 TIF METROPLAINS Invoice 7103 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 362 -47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 20088 Invoice 7095 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2008C Invoice 7096 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 334 - 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2008D Invoice 7090 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 363- 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2009A Invoice 7099 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2009B Invoice 7100 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2009B Invoice 7100 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2009B Invoice 7100 12/15/2011 -381- Total $1,530.05 $92.23 -$0.75 $157.93 -$0.70 Total $248.71 $247.50 $45.00 $157.50 $450.00 $450.00 $450.00 $337.50 $37.53 $74.97 $750.00 $750.00 $450.00 $550.00 $450.00 $450.00 $229.50 $150.75 $69.75 CITY OF MOUND Payments ........... CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 335 -47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2009C Invoice 7091 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2009C Invoice 7091 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 370 - 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2011 B Invoice 7101 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2011B Invoice 7101 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 201113 Invoice 7101 12/15/2011 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -620 Fiscal Agent's Fees 2011 B Invoice 7101 12/15/2011 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 37 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPP Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 3 CASES OF LIGHT BULBS Invoice 903512859 1/24/2012 PO 22863 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 4 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREN T Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training SUPERVISION & MGMT TRAINING M. SUSSMAN; IMPACT & INFLUENCE March 5 -6 Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 PO 23815 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training SUPERVISION & MGMT TRAINING D. NICCUM; SUPERVISOR SURVIVAL JAN 30 -31 Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 PO 23812 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training SUPERVISION & MGMT TRAINING M. SUSSMAN; MIENS & MORALS FEB 1 -2 Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 PO 23816 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training SUPERVISION & MGMT TRAINING M. SUSSMAN; PROJECT PATHWAYS FEB 15 Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 PO 23817 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -434 Conference & Training SUPERVISION & MGMT TRAINING M. SUSSMAN; STRATEGIES FOR STRESS - MGRS GUIDE FEB 16 -17 Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 PO 23818 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training SUPERVISION & MGMT TRAINING M. SUSSMAN; SUPERVISORS SURVIVAL March 7 -8 Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 PO 23819 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -434 Conference & Training SUPERVISION & MGMT TRAINING M. SUSSMAN & D. NICCUM; MENTORING & COACHING APRIL 4 -5 Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 PO 23813 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 9 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT Invoice 0108055917 1/19/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 0108055916 1/19/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 14 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC -382- 10100 Total 10100 Total 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 4 $171.00 $279.00 $247.63 $64.13 $70.19 $68.05 $7,000.00 $157.75 $157.75 $175.00 $175.00 $175.00 $90.00 $175.00 $175.00 $350.00 $1,315.00 - $17.60 $177.85 $160.25 CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM �\ Payments Page 5 *NI+IIMItI►L Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $340.00 Invoice 1011098 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $340.00 Refer 10 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $0.00 Invoice 634483 1/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,245.62 Invoice 634482 1/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $311.10 Invoice 634609 1/18/2012 Total $350.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,452.31 Invoice 635494 1/24/2012 $699.76 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $0.00 Invoice 635493 1/24/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,009.03 Refer 15 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,583.10 Invoice 636381 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,583.10 Refer 12 DEANS AUTO BODY Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPAIR DENT & RUST 2004 FORD $350.00 EXPEDITION XLT Invoice 021412 1/4/2012 PO 23808 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $350.00 Refer 16 DELL MARKETING L.P. Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft DELL DESKTOP PC FOR COUNCIL $699.76 CHAMBERS WMINDOWS 7 SOFTWARE, KEYBOARD, MONITOR ETC Invoice XFN341PR2 1/24/2012 PO 23951 Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 19" STANDARD PC MONITOR FINANCE $168.98 DIRECTOR Invoice XFN2C8WW8 1/23/2012 PO 23951 Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 19" STANDARD PC MONITOR CITY $168.98 MANAGER Invoice XFN2C8WW8 1/23/2012 PO 23951 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,037.72 Refer 11 DRIVER AND VEHICLE SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -438 Licenses and Taxes REGISTRATION & TABS POLICE 2004 FORD $108.75 EXPEDITION Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.75 Refer 13 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa RED BULL MIX $178.00 Invoice W- 490267 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $178.00 Refer 14 FERGUSON WATERWORKS -383- CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 6 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply METER PARTS; 6 CAP LINERS 5/8 ", 6 BOTTOM CAP LINERS 3/4" Invoice S01346332.001 1/5/2012 PO 23654 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 17 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMP Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 26476 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 15 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA $19.71 Total $19.71 $21.00 Total $21.00 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 01 -20 -12 THRU 2- Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 16 G & K SERVICES 20-12 Invoice 3648444 1/20/2012 Invoice 1006558463 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 01 -20 -12 THRU 2- Invoice 1006558467 1/23/2012 20-12 Invoice 3648444 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 01 -20 -12 THRU 2- Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies 20 -12 Invoice 3648444 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 01 -20 -12 THRU 2- 20-12 Invoice 3648444 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 16 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SERVICE 1 -23 -12 Invoice 1006558463 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SERVICE & SUPPLIES 1 -23 -12 Invoice 1006558467 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SERVICE 1 -23 -12 Invoice 1006558469 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SERVICE 1 -23 -12 Invoice 1006558470 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SERVICE & SHOP SUPPLIES 1 -23 -12 Invoice 1006558470 1/23/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 17 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SERVICE 1 -16 -12 Invoice 1006547544 1/16/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SERVICE 1 -16 -12 Invoice 1006547544 1/16/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SERVICE 1 -16 -12 Invoice 1006547544 1/16/2012 Total $148.06 $148.06 $296.10 $148.06 $740.28 $55.88 $150.06 $93.67 $44.66 $61.67 $405.94 $23.21 $25.69 $23.41 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SERVICE & SHOP SUPPLIES 1 -16 -12 $189.05 Invoice 1006547544 1/16/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $261.36 Refer 18 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 1 -30 -12 $40.15 Invoice 1006569427 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies SHOP SUPPLIES 1 -30 -12 $56.80 Invoice 1006569427 1/30/2012 -384- CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 7 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $96.95 Refer 18 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SERVICE 1 -23 -12 $23.21 Invoice 1006558466 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SERVICE 1 -23 -12 $25.69 Invoice 1006558466 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SERVICE 1 -23 -12 $23.41 Invoice 1006558466 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SERVICE & SHOP SUPPLIES 1 -23 -12 $227.64 Invoice 1006558466 1/23/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SERVICE 1 -30 -12 $55.88 Invoice 1006569421 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $355.83 Refer 19 GARY'S DIESEL SERVICE Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs '04 PETERBUILT #508 REPAIR OIL LEAK @ $6,751.97 FRONT AXLE, CLEAN HOUSING INSTALL REBUILT DEFFERENTIAL Invoice 15651 1/17/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs '04 PETERBUILT #508 REPLACE HOISE $4,171.98 CYLINDER, ADAPT FITTINGS, INSTALL NEW VALVE & HOSE Invoice 15685 1/24/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,923.95 Refer 20 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -395 Gopher One -Call JANUARY 2012 LOCATES $34.95 Invoice 32178 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -395 Gopher One -Call JANUARY 2012 LOCATES $34.95 Invoice 32178 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $69.90 Refer 19 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $484.00 Invoice 135639 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $9.00 Invoice 135639 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $493.00 Refer 21 H & L MESABI AGGREGATE CONS Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts SURFACE HARDEN FSE BLADES, BOLTS, $1,286.18 NUTS Invoice 84653 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,286.18 Refer 20 HAGEN, SARAH _ Cash Payment G 101 -22803 Police Reserves POLICE RESERVE EMERGENCY CALLOUT $10.00 2011 PAY Invoice 021412 1/7/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10.00 Refer 22 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -227 Chemicals 150 LB CHLORINE CYLINDER $15.00 Invoice 3303773 1/27/2012 -385- _ CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM -"� Page 8 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 21 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies WORKBENCH MATERIALS PARK SHOP Invoice 021412 1/19/2012 FREIGHT Invoice 1675280 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 22 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED 1/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1689148 Invoice 587003 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 23 INFRA TECH E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic TRAX CRAWLER MOTOR REPAIR & FREIGHT Invoice 1200000 1/13/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 24 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 23 INFRA TECH 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts 34 LITER ALL -IN -ONE CAL GAS FOR Invoice 1689171 1127/2012 SPERIAN MONITOR E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1200018 1/24/2012 Cash Payment Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 24 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 1675280 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX ZING ZANG Invoice 1689149 1/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1689148 1/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1675280 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1676333 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 24 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1689176 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1689171 1127/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1689185 1/3112012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1689184 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 25 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1217731 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1217732 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1217733 1/18/2012 -386- $15.00 $489.87 $489.87 $237.25 $237.25 $180.61 $180.61 $208.41 $208.41 $3.00 $38.80 $1,142.86 $366.00 $76.00 10100 Total $1,626.66 $152.00 $113.00 $213.10 $2,004.13 10100 Total $2,482.23 $2,112.44 $2,481.10 $60.50 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1217734 1/18/2012 DISH SOAP Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Refer 28 KLM ENGINEERING, INCORPORAT Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1221847 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1221848 1/25/2012 DRILL BIT, SCREWS, COUNTERSINK FLUTE, Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1221849 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 523778 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 27 JUBILEE FOODS SUPER -22 X/L DRILL 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 9 $280.00 10100 Total $4,934.04 $2,013.69 $3,480.94 $64.50 - $11.04 10100 Total $5,548.09 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies ICE SALT Invoice 021412 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies DISH SOAP Invoice 021412 1/14/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 28 KLM ENGINEERING, INCORPORAT Cash Payment G 101 -23211 T- Mobile Upgrade Well #8 To T- MOBILE SITE VISIT, PROJECT SUPERVISION & FIELD INSPECTION Invoice 4451 1/18/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 29 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply DRILL BIT, SCREWS, COUNTERSINK FLUTE, Invoice 9300542771 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply DRAWER, HEAVY DUTY RACK DRILL BIT, WASHERS, NYLON CABLE TIES, DISPOSABLE GLOVES Invoice 9300525452 1/16/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 38 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SUPER -22 X/L DRILL Invoice 9300555022 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 25 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -434 Conference & Training 2012 SAFETY & LOSS CONTROL WKSHP 4- 26-12 S. SMITH Invoice 156757 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 32 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEM Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2012 DUES METROPOLITAN AREA MGMT ASSOC- K. HANSON Invoice 798 1/18/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 33 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH - -387- $5.14 $4.07 $9.21 $698.00 $698.00 $341.25 $437.91 $779.16 $122.51 $122.51 $20.00 $20.00 $45.00 $45.00 CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 10 Payments t CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -434 Conference & Training WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM OPERATOR EXAM $64.00 B. BERENT & H. STRICKLEN MARCH 8, 2012 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 PO 23658 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.00 Refer 34 MOORE, CARLTON Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT CEAM $85.91 CONFERENCE BROKLYN CENTER JAN 25 -27 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Project 12-4 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85.91 Refer 28 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib FEB 2012 FIRE RELIEF PAYMENT BALANCE $11,340.73 Invoice 021412 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,340.73 Refer 35 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MUSIC SERVICE FEB 2012 LIQUOR STORE $108.94 Invoice 021412 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.94 Refer 36 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials SIGN CAPS REORDER $86.84 Invoice TI- 0244426 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.84 Refer 26 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials SHEETED BLANK SIGN MATERIALS, ROUND $3,656.30 POSTS Invoice TI- 0244443 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials SHEETED BLANK SIGN MATERIALS $79.78 Invoice TI- 0244453 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,736.08 Refer 27 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials BRACKETS SERARRATORS & SEPARATORS $600.58 Invoice TI- 0244534 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials CREDIT RETURN BRACKET RAIN CAPS - $101.53 Invoice TI- 0244536 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials CREDIT RETURN BRACKET CLOSURE CAPS - $61.08 Invoice TI- 0244537 1/23/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $437.97 Refer 40 OFFICE DEPOT (POLICE) Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies INK CARTRIDGE, CX TAPE, PENS, MEMO $64.56 PADS PD SUPPLIES Invoice 594198516001 1/16/2012 PO 23821 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.56 Refer 39 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 10141310 -210 Operating Supplies WIRELESS MOUSE CITY MGR DEPT $50.78 Invoice 595143575001 1/23/2012 PO 23953 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -210 Operating Supplies PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE, B. RITTER $103.38 Invoice 595143577001 1/24/2012 PO 23953 -388- CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 11 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -210 Operating Supplies LAMINATING POUCHES Invoice 595143514001 1/23/2012 PO 23953 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 41 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8334790 -IN 1/16/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8334790 -IN 1116/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 8334785 -IN 1/16/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8334785 -IN 1/16/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8334908 -IN 1/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8334908 -IN 1/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8335539 -IN 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8335539 -IN 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale WINE Invoice 8335537 -IN 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8335537 -IN 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 8335782 -IN 1/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT Invoice 8335782 -IN 1/24/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 42 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2185147 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2185148 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2185149 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2185150 1/18/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 43 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2187964 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2187965 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2187962 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2187963 1/25/2012 W-16.Z $3.70 10100 Total $157.86 $622.80 $10.00 $57.00 $2.25 $71.00 $1.25 $2,296.86 $43.75 $63.97 $2.25 - $102.00 -$2.50 10100 Total $3,066.63 $0.00 $4,074.15 $58.24 $682.10 10100 Total $4,814.49 $1,390.95 $592.00 $192.60 $61.90 CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 12 Payments ............ ... ..... .........._.._.._._•...• CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 44 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEM Invoice 563177 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2012 MEMBERSHIP DUES S. HAWKS, V Cash Payment WEBER Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 PO 23826 Invoice 562986 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 45 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 563177 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT Invoice 562986 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 564291 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 563176 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 563175 1/18/2012 ROLYAN BUOYS Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 46 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Total $2,237.45 $60.00 Total $60.00 Total Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 566338 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 566319 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 566355 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 566234 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 47 ROLYAN BUOYS Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -500 Capital Outlay FA BUOY MARKERS W /HAZARD SYMBOL, FLOATS, ROPE Invoice 3585323 1/17/2012 PO 22860 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply BUOY MARKERS W /HAZARD SYMBOL, FLOATS, ROPE Invoice 3585323 1/17/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 29 SALSBURY INDUSTRIES Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies LOCKERS, ALUMINUM BENCH FOR PIN BLDG Invoice 648597 1/23/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 48 SIMPLEX GRINNELL _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR KEY PAD WIRING & REPLACE DOOR TRANSMITTER BATTERIES 1-6 -12 Invoice 67370594 1/10/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 49 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1717210 1/20/2012 -390- $2,270.60 - $112.00 $155.45 $676.00 $17.00 $3,007.05 $372.00 $91.95 $4,660.30 $603.96 $5,728.21 $1,988.14 $277.88 $2,266.02 $5,254.87 $5,254.87 $455.00 $455.00 $169.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments _ •.�. CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 1717210 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 50 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1679152 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 1679152 1/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1679152 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 51 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1717209 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 1717209 1/18/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 30 SPRINT WIRELESS Cash Payment E 10142110 -321 Telephone & Cells DSN NETWORK SERVICE 12 -15 -11 THRU 1- 14-12 Invoice 772348811 -050 1/18/2012 Transaction Date 1/31/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 31 SPRINT WIRELESS Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 12 -15 -11 THRU 1-14 - 12 PD Invoice 924573317 -122 1/1812012 Transaction Date 1/3112012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 52 TAHO SPORTSWEAR Cash Payment E 10145200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM JACKET PARKS D. KOSKELA Invoice 11TF2569 1/12/2012 PO 22859 Cash Payment E 10145200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms PARKS DEPT TURTLENECKS, T- SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS W /PARK LOGO IMPRINTING Invoice 12TF0014 1/12/2012 PO 22859 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms SWEATSHIRTS W /SCREEN LOGO PRINTING Invoice 12TF0118 1/31/2012 PO 22859 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 53 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 673818 1/31/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R STEINS Invoice 673818 1/31/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 673819 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 54 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 671876 1/17/2012 -391- 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 13 $1.15 $170.15 $484.00 $6.90 $206.14 $697.04 $182.70 $1.15 $183.85 $319.92 $319.92 $485.95 $485.95 $71.25 $602.60 $112.00 $785.85 $31.10 $13.00 $3,209.70 $3,253.80 $154.25 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 671877 1/17/2012 $424.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 00772052 1/20/2012 1/26/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 55 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN 1/19/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 672836 1124/2012 1/19/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 672837 1/24/2012 WINE CONNECT Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 672836 1/24/2012 Invoice 936 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 56 VINIFERA MINNESOTA Refer 60 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 323592 1/27/2012 Invoice 393938 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 57 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Invoice 394764 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0051297 -IN 1/26/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0051297 -IN 1/26/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0051297 -IN 1/26/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 58 WINE COMPANY 10100 10100 10100 10100 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 290682 1/26/2012 $424.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 290682 1/26/2012 $272.00 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 290235 1/19/2012 $4.20 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 290235 1/19/2012 $95.12 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 59 WINE CONNECT $2,920.00 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic FEB 2012 HWS WEBSITE Invoice 936 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/112012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 60 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 393938 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 394764 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 63 WINE NEWS INCORPORATED -392- 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 14 $1,508.85 $113.00 Total $1,776.10 $61.75 $4,003.58 $18.00 Total $4,083.33 $315.00 Total $315.00 $280.00 $424.00 $16.00 Total $720.00 $272.00 $6.30 $176.00 $4.20 Total $458.50 $95.12 Total $95.12 $1,696.00 $1,224.00 Total $2,920.00 CITY OF MOUND 02/08/12 2:51 PM �., Page 15 Payments CITY OF MOULD Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE ENTHUSIAST PUBLICATIONS FEB 2012 $15.00 Invoice 881497 1/20/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 61 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,594.00 Invoice 850223 1/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,051.85 Invoice 852762 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,645.85 Refer 64 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $631.45 Invoice 691802 1/19/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,221.48 Invoice 691803 1/19/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $50.00 Invoice 691553 1/19/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,902.93 Refer 65 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,140.35 Invoice 695047 1/26/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $26.95 Invoice 695048 1/26/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,003.19 Invoice 695049 1/26/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $119.90 Invoice 695050 1/26/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,290.39 Refer 66 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities PIN PARKING LOT TEMP LIGHTS - 5455 $215.38 LYNWOOD ELECTRICITY THRU 1 -24 -12 Invoice 406636593 1/25/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $215.38 Refer 67 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities 5801 COMMERCE BLVD & 5341 MAYWOOD $5,123.84 RD ST. LIGHTS THRU 2 -2 -12 Invoice 406995683 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,123.84 Refer 68 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY Cash Payment E602-49450-210 Operating Supplies ZEP 40 $77.72 Invoice 57438726 1/17/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.72 &1*11 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Fund Summary Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $130,617.62 Total $130,617.62 -394- 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 16 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $22,489.58 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $12,176.35 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $140.08 334 G.0 2008 - D Equip Cert $450.00 335 G.O. 2009 - C Equip Cert $171.00 350 MOUND TRANSIT CTR SERIES 2006 $750.00 355 2003 -C G.O. TIF 1 -2 $750.00 362 G.O. 2008 - B Improvements $450.00 363 G.O. 2009 - A Improvements $450.00 368 G.O. 2005 - A Improvements $450.00 369 G.O. 2006 - A Improvements $450.00 370 2011A REFUNDING BONDS $247.63 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $175.10 601 WATER FUND $13,459.47 602 SEWER FUND $7,296.68 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $70,154.68 670 RECYCLING FUND $93.39 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $463.66 $130,617.62 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $130,617.62 Total $130,617.62 -394- 02/08/12 2:51 PM Page 16 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Payments Page 1 CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 021412CITY2 Payments Current Period: February 2012 User Dollar Amt $245,213.61 Computer Dollar Amt $245,213.61 $0.00 In Balance Refer 174 A -1 RENTAL OF LAKE MINNETONK Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies SCRUB BRUSHES & PAD RENTAL 17" FLOOR 3M THIN Invoice 81713 1/26/2012 PO 23659 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 173 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY, IN Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 0131456 2/7/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Refer 88 ALLDATA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 19978460 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 19978460 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 19978460 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 19978460 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 19978460 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Refer 90 ALLIED WASTE ARM WELDMENT $10.69 $70.15 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.15 2012 SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $300.00 SYSTEM 2012 SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $300.00 SYSTEM 2012 SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $300.00 SYSTEM 2012 SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $300.00 SYSTEM 2012 SUBSCRIPTION TO AUTO INFORM $300.00 SYSTEM Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,500.00 Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -440 Other Contractual Servic 0125120894- 002764269CITY WIDE RECYLCING SERVICE JANUARY 2012 Invoice Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 89 ALLIED WASTE Total Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa FEB 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE Invoice 0894 - 002767419 1/25/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa FEB 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE Invoice 0894 - 002767417 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa FEB 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE Invoice 0894- 002767417 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa FEB 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE Invoice 0894- 002765327 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa FEB 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE Invoice 0894 - 002764697 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 179 AMUNDSON, M. LLP Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -256 Tobacco Products For R TOBACCO PRODUCTS Invoice 125519 2/8/2012 -395- $14,280.21 $14,280.21 $98.61 $98.94 $98.94 $298.59 $102.92 $698.00 $546.10 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Payments Page 2 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $546.10 Refer 91 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. REPLACE PAGER UNIT $95.00 Invoice 27252 1/17/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.00 Refer 92 APPROVED EQUAL COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -401 Building Repairs HVAC TEMPERATURE CONTROLS REPAIR $104.25 SVC Invoice 11057 1/17/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance HVAC TEMPERATURE CONTROLS REPAIR $104.25 SVC Invoice 11057 1/17/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $208.50 Refer 94 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES - TWIST TIES $26.00 Invoice 86342100 2/3/2012 Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES - BAGS $49.95 Invoice 86341800 2/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $27.60 Invoice 86341800 2/3/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $103.55 Refer 95 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,074.40 Invoice 72038100 2/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $38.75 Invoice 72038100 2/3/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,113.15 Refer 178 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,670.70 Invoice 72052600 2/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,670.70 Refer 96 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $365.55 Invoice 5761 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $365.55 Refer 194 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $99.20 Invoice 43170 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.20 Refer 97 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE, CREAM, COCOA $84.50 Invoice 992487 1/25/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84.50 Refer 99 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/IM Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts SWITCH BUTTON # 1205 $9.78 Invoice 6974 - 174092 1/3/2012 -396- CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts 6G -6FJX #1105 Invoice 6974 - 174092 1/3/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 100 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/IM 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts RELAY ACCESSORY #1105 Invoice 6974 - 174184 1/4/2012 COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -220 Repair /Maint Supply WIPER BLADES SQUAD #849 Invoice 6974 - 174278 1/5/2012 Invoice 2910 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts MIRROR, CAPSULE STANDARD Invoice 6974 - 174650 1/12/2012 E 101 -41110 -431 Meeting Expense Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs WINTER WIPER BLADES, Invoice 6974 - 175291 1/23/2012 GAS CYLINDER FOR CALIBRATION OF PBTS Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 101 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/149 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts 12 VOLT EURO OE BATT #308 Invoice 6974 - 174394 1/9/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts CABIN AIR FILTER #1604 Invoice 6974 - 174394 1/9/2012 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials OIL FILTER, TRACTOR LAMP Invoice 6974 - 174394 1/9/2012 COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 102 CATERED EVENT 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 3 $13.78 Total $23.56 $12.42 $27.11 $15.46 $42.37 Total $97.36 $265.02 $15.59 $42.42 Project 12 -3 Total $323.03 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -431 Meeting Expense COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 2910 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -431 Meeting Expense COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Invoice 00064032 1/31/2012 Project 12 -3 DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 2910 1/30/2012 $13.92 Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -431 Meeting Expense COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies GAS CYLINDER FOR CALIBRATION OF PBTS DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 2910 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -431 Meeting Expense COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 2910 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -431 Meeting Expense COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 $318.64 $22.76 $113.80 $182.08 $250.36 Invoice 2910 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $887.64 Refer 104 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL $13.92 Invoice 00064032 1/31/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13.92 Refer 107 CMI, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies GAS CYLINDER FOR CALIBRATION OF PBTS $122.41 .08 Invoice 773253 1/30/2012 PO 23823 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $122.41 Refer 105 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST -397- CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 4 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS $158.10 Invoice 0108057007 2/2/2012 DINNER 1 -30 -12 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $158.10 Refer 125 COOKE, J.P. COMPANY BAR SERVICE VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies DOG & CAT LICENSE TAGS & HOOKS $127.09 Invoice 164025 1/27/2012 PO 23824 E 101 - 41110 -431 Meeting Expense BAR SERVICE VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $127.09 Refer 106 CORNERSTONE CAFE Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -431 Meeting Expense BAR SERVICE VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -431 Meeting Expense BAR SERVICE VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -431 Meeting Expense BAR SERVICE VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -431 Meeting Expense BAR SERVICE VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -431 Meeting Expense BAR SERVICE VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 108 DAVIS MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -401 Building Repairs HEATING SYSTEM SVC ON ROOFTOP UNIT PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG Invoice 12013 1/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance HEATING SYSTEM SVC ON ROOFTOP UNIT PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG Invoice 12013 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 181 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 637236 2/7/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 109 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINT Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair FULL SERVICE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SAFETY INSPECTION TANKER/PUMPER #35 Invoice 59513 1/12/2012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair FULL SERVICE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SAFETY INSPECTION ENGINE #18 Invoice 59511 1/12/2012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair FULL SERVICE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SAFETY INSPECTION LADDER 317 Invoice 59512 1/12/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 175 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESE Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic ARC VFW MR ANNUAL MTCE 2012TCE Invoice 92447236 1/31/2012 -398- Project 12 -4 $115.08 $8.22 $41.10 $65.76 $90.47 $320.63 $227.00 $227.00 $454.00 $2,237.30 $2,237.30 $712.22 $676.11 $1,033.61 $2,421.94 $710.50 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 5 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $710.50 Refer 110 FIRE CHIEF, MN ASSOCIATION Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -433 Dues and Subscriptions MEMBERSHIP DUES 2012 $203.00 Invoice 021412 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $203.00 Refer 112 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE Cash Payment E222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2012 & 2013 SUBSCRIPTION $41.95 Invoice 021412 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 218/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $41.95 Refer 113 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $377.01 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $377.01 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $388.42 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $109.39 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $505.73 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $854.36 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $355.98 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SERVICE 12 -30 -11 THRU 02 -29 -12 $213.59 Invoice 021412 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,181.49 Refer 114 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SERVICE 1 -23 -12 FIRE DEPT $83.24 Invoice 1006558468 1/23/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $83.24 Refer 115 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 2 -6 -12 $78.99 Invoice 1006580611 2/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $78.99 Refer 116 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 2 -6 -12 CITY HALL Invoice 1006580617 2/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 117 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -6 -12 PARKS Invoice 1006580617 2/6/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies SHOP SUPPLIES & MAT SVC 2 -6 -12 PARKS Invoice 1006580617 2/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -399- $174.45 $174.45 $44.66 $61.67 $106.33 �7 i t i `1s7 3 i�11411111 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: February 2012 Refer 103 GILLESPIE CENTER Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310431 Meeting Expense Invoice MISC PLANNING FEES JAN 2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice WALGREENS PLANNING FEES JAN 201: Cash Payment E 101 - 45200431 Meeting Expense Invoice Cash Payment E 281 - 45210431 Meeting Expense Invoice Cash Payment G 101 -23249 3070 HIGHLAND #11 -13 MO Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Refer 118 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _ Cash Payment E 60249450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 120138115 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Refer 119 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OF Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners Invoice Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Refer 182 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 COMMISSION VOLUNTEER APPRECIATION DINNER 1 -30 -12 Wells Fargo 10100 Total RADIO ADMINISTRATION & LEASE FEE JAN 2012 PUB WKS Project 12 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total PER DIEM & PROCESSING FEE JAN 2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 588905 217/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 120 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING FEES JAN 2012 Invoice 007 - 005-44 2/3/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23247 WALGREENS #11 -10 SEMP WALGREENS PLANNING FEES JAN 201: Invoice 007 - 005-44 2/3/2012 Cash Payment G 101-232454839/4851 SHORELINE #11- MISC PLANNING FEES JAN 2012 4839 SHORELINE Invoice 007 - 005-44 2/3/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23249 3070 HIGHLAND #11 -13 MO MISC PLANNING FEES JAN 2012 3070 HIGHLAND Invoice 007 - 005-44 2/3/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 195 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS JAN 2012 Invoice 007 - 001-45 2/3/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23250 5001 WILSHIRE #12 -01 WIN WINKLER PLANNING SVCS JAN 2012 Invoice 007 - 001-45 2/3/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23251 XX MANCHESTER SUBDV GULLICKSON PLANNING SVCS JAN 201, Invoice 007 - 001-45 2/3/2012 -400- Total Total $47.60 $3.40 $17.00 $27.20 $37.30 $132.50 $160.00 $160.00 $1,826.26 $1,826.26 $254.00 $254.00 $141.15 $1,572.90 $207.50 $228.25 $2,149.80 $373.50 $20.75 $41.50 59ii'MALLs1111 1i!I ; CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Payments Page 7 Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23246 PBK SIGN VARIANCE #11 -1 PBK SIGN PLANNING SVCS JAN 2012 $20.75 Invoice 007 - 001-45 2/3/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $456.50 Refer 121 ISLAND PARK SKELLY _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SERVICE'09 FORD CROWN VIC #845- $213.57 CHANGED OIL & FILTER, REPLACED THERMOSTAT Invoice 032446 1/25/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SERVICE'08 FORD CROWN VIC #848- $90.23 CHANGED OIL & FILTER, ROTATED TIRES, $1,397.00 BEER REMOVED BUMBER REPLACED STROBE BEER $3,207.05 LIGHT - $40.00 Invoice 032465 1/31/2012 -401- Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SERVICE'l0 CHEVY TAHOE #843- $170.62 CHANGED OIL & FILTER, REPLACED AIR FILTER Invoice 032468 1/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SERVICE'11 FORD CROWN VIC #844 - $49.55 CHANGED OIL & FILTER Invoice 032471 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SERVICE'06 CHEVY COLORADON #846- $29.41 CHANGED OIL & FILTER Invoice 032473 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SERVICE'l1 FORD ESCAPE #841- $49.55 CHANGED OIL & FILTER Invoice 032474 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SERVICE'08 FORD CROWN VIC #842- $26.08 CHANGED FILTER, TOPPED OFF OIL Invoice 032479 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $629.01 Refer 122 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services CONTRACTED CLEANING SVC FOR CITY $726.26 HALL FEB 2012 Invoice MIN02120321 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -460 Janitorial Services FEB 2012 CLEANING SERVICE PUBLIC $267.19 WORKS BLDG Invoice MIN02120321 2/1/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $993.45 Refer 126 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -350 Printing Invoice 31263 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Refer 123 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1685640 2/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 1714619 2/7/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 010149 2/3/2012 Transaction Date 2/912012 2012 SPRING NEWSLETTER PRINTING 6150 $1,397.00 8 PG Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,397.00 BEER $369.00 BEER $3,207.05 BEER CREDIT - $40.00 Wells F<- -_, - 10100 Total $3,536.05 -401- CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM f, .._....\ Page 8 Payments ....................__ .... .._ CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Refer 124 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1226511 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1226512 2/1/2012 Invoice 021412 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1226513 2/1/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 183 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT Invoice 525032 2/2/2012 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 525031 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 127 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment $1,814.42 $4,414.58 $60.50 Total $6,289.50 - $34.25 - $37.00 Total - $71.25 Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies DONUTS, OJ, EGG SANDWICHES, MUTUAL AID HOUSE FIRE 1 -2 -12 Invoice 021412 1/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 128 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 1ST QTR 2012 LMCD LEVY Invoice 021412 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 130 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 101-43100-151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1 ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURQNr.F Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 -402- Total Total $62.37 $62.37 $5,776.00 $5,776.00 $14.46 $644.33 $586.47 $12,161.99 $407.64 $6,353.85 $2,340.61 $6,898.24 $399.75 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Payments Page 9 Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1 ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -151 Worker's Comp Insuranc 1 ST QTR 2012 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE Invoice 22033 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 129 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES $2,614.12 $6,711.51 $1,630.53 Total $40,763.50 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training POLICE ACCREDITED TRAINING ONLINE Refer 132 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26347 1/16/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26367 1/19/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26375 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26395 1/26/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26406 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Refer 133 MERTZ, CRAIG M. LAW OFFICE DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -16 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -19 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -23 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -26 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -30 -12 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -304 Legal Fees 2012 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL Invoice 156570 1/23/2012 $8,744.29 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 131 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER Invoice 021412 2/7/2012 BLACK & WHITE COPIES 1 -10 THRU 2 -9 -12 Invoice 1358966 2/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 4TH FLOOR COPIER E 602 -49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTE WATER SERVICE MARCH 2012 BLACK & WHITE COPIES 1 -10 THRU 2 -9 -12 Invoice 1358966 2/6/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 132 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26347 1/16/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26367 1/19/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26375 1/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26395 1/26/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 26406 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Refer 133 MERTZ, CRAIG M. LAW OFFICE DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -16 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -19 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -23 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -26 -12 DELIVERY SERVICE 1 -30 -12 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -304 Legal Fees PROSECUTION SVCS JANUARY 2012 Invoice 0000390 2/5/2012 $8,744.29 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 111 METRO FIRE OFFICERS ASSOC MI Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2012 MEMBERSHIP DUES Invoice 021412 2/7/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 134 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTE WATER SERVICE MARCH 2012 Invoice 0000981270 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 87 MILLER, ALISHA LYNN - -403- $1,020.00 $1,020.00 $11.70 $11.69 $23.39 $29.40 $329.00 $15.40 $285.60 $9.80 Total $669.20 $8,744.29 Total $8,744.29 $100.00 Total $100.00 $62,357.48 Total $62,357.48 CITY OF MOUND Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -300 Professional Srvs MOUND FIRE & RESCUE GROUP PHOTOS & SESSION FEE Invoice 0112 12/28/2011 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -300 Professional Srvs MOUND FIRE & RESCUE WALL COLLAGE 24 X 30 PHOTO Invoice 0112 -2 12/28/2011 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 184 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 1 -16 -12 Invoice 921094099 2/5/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 172 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO _ Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -300 Professional Srvs VOLUNTARY INVESTIGATION CLEANUP PARKING RAMP Invoice 7700004251 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 98 MINNESOTA PUBLISHING Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising 1/4 & 1/2 PG ADS WEST LAKE BUSINESS PUB - WINE SALE Invoice 14009 1/31/2012 Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 136 MINNETONKA SPORTSMEN, INCO Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2012 RANGE MEMBERSHIP FOR PD Invoice 021412 2/912012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 135 MN STREET SUPERINTENDENTS Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2012 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL R. HANSON Invoice 021412 2/9/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 137 MNSPECT Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -308 Building Inspection Fees FIRE INSPECTION SVC JAN 2012 Invoice 5710 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 138 MNSPECT Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees JAN 2012 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES Invoice 5708 2/2/2012 Cash Payment R 101 -42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee JAN 2012 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION /PERMIT FEE CREDIT Invoice 5708 2/2/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments JAN 2012 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION /PERMIT SURCHARGE CREDIT Invoice 5708 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 139 MOUND FIRE RELIEF GENERAL F Cash Payment E 22242260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib Invoice 021412 2/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 10 $436.05 $176.99 $613.04 $65.19 $65.19 $125.00 $125.00 $373.00 $373.00 $202.72 $202.72 $50.00 $50.00 $292.50 $292.50 $2,604.68 - $128.00 - $70.00 $2,406.68 JAN & FEB 2012 PYMT BALANCE DUE $12,620.74 Wells Fp —n 10100 Total $12,620.74 -404- _ CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 11 Payments Wi Oyd09111M Current Period: February 2012 Refer 140 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials EC FILM BLACK $654.08 Invoice TE- 0244763 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $654.08 Refer 141 NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMPAN Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -237 Deicing Salt DEICING SALT $5,501.61 Invoice 70792360 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,501.61 Refer 142 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -200 Office Supplies FILE FOLDERS, ENVELOPES, SHET $337.42 PROTECTORS, TONER, COPY PAPER Invoice 593050658001 1/9/2012 PO 23355 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $337.42 Refer 143 PAUSCHE, CATHERINE Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -210 Operating Supplies REIMBURSE SUPPLIES TO SET UP $77.14 STANDING WORKSTATION FOR K. HANSON Invoice 021412 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.14 Refer 144 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $936.01 Invoice 8337275 2/6/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 8337275 2/6/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $965.78 Invoice 8336940 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $16.25 Invoice 8336940 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,930.54 Refer 145 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $131.00 Invoice 2191236 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $715.85 Invoice 2191237 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,254.55 Invoice 2191238 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,101.40 Refer 146 PLUNKETT'S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic PEST CONTROL SERVICE CITY HALL $111.15 Invoice 3019187 1/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.15 Refer 147 PROLAWNS ON THE LAKE _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic CITY HALL FERTILIZER WEED CONTROL $103.00 2012 CONTRACTED SVC Invoice 01772 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance POLICE DEPT FERTILIZER WEED CONTROL 2012 CONTRACTED SVC Invoice 01772 1/20/2012 -405- $166.50 _ CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 12 Payments AHIRIAZISIKIN Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -402 Building Maintenance FIRE DEPT FERTILIZER WEED CONTROL $166.50 $954.00 $7,404.00 $567.00 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,361.00 Refer 148 QUALIFICATION TARGETS, INCOR Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -219 Safety supplies TACTICAL TARGETS - PD 2012 CONTRACTED SVC Invoice 01772 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45250 -400 Repairs & Maintenance CEMETERY FERTILIZER WEED CONTROL Refer 149 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS 2012 CONTRACTED SVC Invoice 01772 1/20/2012 $565.33 Cash Payment E 101.45200 -400 Repairs & Maintenance CITY PARKS & GREENWAY FERTILIZER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER WEED CONTROL 2012 CONTRACTED SVC Invoice 01772 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -400 Repairs & Maintenance ROUND UP APPLICATION FERTILIZER Invoice 569115 2/1/2012 WEED CONTROL 2012 CONTRACTED SVC Invoice 01772 1/20/2012 $3,375.04 $166.50 $954.00 $7,404.00 $567.00 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,361.00 Refer 148 QUALIFICATION TARGETS, INCOR Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -219 Safety supplies TACTICAL TARGETS - PD $304.62 Invoice 21200072 1/13/2012 PO 23820 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $304.62 Refer 149 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $565.33 Invoice 569113 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $16.00 Invoice 569114 -CO 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R OLIVES $35.60 Invoice 569115 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,375.04 Invoice 569116 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,991.97 Refer 150 RITTER, BONNIE Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -431 Meeting Expense REIMBURSE MILEAGE TO REDISTRICTING $19.31 MTG IN PLYMOUTH 2 -2 -12 Invoice 021412 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19.31 Refer 151 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SMALL EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MTCE PARTS $89.64 Invoice 2039265 2/1/2012 PO 23364 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $89.64 Refer 152 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair MOWER REPAIR; CHANGE OIL & FILTER, $365.62 CLEAN FUEL SCREEN, CHECK BELTS LIGHTS Invoice 17364 2/7/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair MOWER PARTS $86.05 Invoice 1091447 2/7/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $451.67 Refer 157 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.42 Invoice 1717254 3/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $226.97 Invoice 1717254 3/4/2012 _4.06_ CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM _ Page 13 Payments �f ............___._.._ •,..r . CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $36.14 Invoice 1717254 3/4/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265.53 Refer 177 SPIRIT OF THE LAKES FESTIVAL Cash Payment E 101 - 41115 -430 Miscellaneous 2012 FESTIVAUCENTENNIAL SPONSORSHIP $6,500.00 Invoice 021412 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,500.00 Refer 154 ST. PETER LUTHERAN CHURCH Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising MUSIC SPONSORSHIP 2012 ADVERTISING $250.00 Invoice 021412 2/8/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 153 STAR TRIBUNE NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 10142110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions POLICE DEPT NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION $244.40 2 -8 -12 THRU 2-6 -13 Invoice 021412 1/22/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $244.40 Refer 159 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -402 Building Maintenance HVAC REPAIRS TO J. MCKINLEY'S OFFICE $52.25 HEATING SYSTEM 1 -12 -12 Invoice 10931 1/12/2012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -401 Building Repairs HVAC REPAIRS TO J. MCKINLEY'S OFFICE $52.25 HEATING SYSTEM 1 -12 -12 Invoice 10931 1/12/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $104.50 Refer 160 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -401 Building Repairs TRAINING ROOM LIGHTING REPAIRS $51.13 Invoice 10927 1/6/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance TRAINING ROOM LIGHTING REPAIRS $51.12 Invoice 10927 1/612012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $102.25 Refer 155 STREICHER'S Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SAFARILAND TRANSPORT HOODS FOR $40.95 SQUADS Invoice 1902255 1/31/2012 PO 23829 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $40.95 Refer 156 STREICHER'S _ Cash Payment G 101 -22803 Police Reserves POLICE RESERVES SHIRTS $119.97 Invoice 1897148 1/12/2012 PO 23801 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $119.97 Refer 158 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $226.00 Invoice 00772166 2/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $96.90 Invoice 674760 2/7/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,126.95 Invoice 674762 2/7/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells FL.407_ 10100 Total $5,449.85 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM ' \ Payments Page 14 i ............ _ ...... ....._..._.. X • A 611-U P Current Period: February 2012 Refer 93 TRAINING OF OFFICERS, ASSOCI Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training INVESTIGATING INTERNET RELATED OFFENSES COURSE J. WITTKE MARCH 8 2012 Invoice 021412 2/6/2012 PO 23837 WIRE ROLLER FRAME & EXTENSION POLE Transaction Date 2/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 185 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) E 101 -45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS Invoice 090500 1/9/2012 E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS Invoice 090617 1/14/2012 E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS Invoice 090721 1/19/2012 E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies RETURN GALVANIZED PLUG Invoice 090811 1/24/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies GALVANIZED PLUG Invoice 090808 1/24/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 186 TRUE VALUE MOUND (POLICE) Total Total Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -210 Operating Supplies TRASH BAGS, TOWELS, MAGIC ERASER Invoice 090745 1/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -220 Repair /Maint Supply ACCESSORY PLUG SQUAD #6401 Invoice 090979 1/30/2012 WIRE ROLLER FRAME & EXTENSION POLE Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 187 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) _ E 101 -45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SEAMBINDER FOR CITY HALL Invoice 090371 1/3/2012 E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS, LUBRICANT Invoice 090378 1/3/2012 E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies STEAM CARPET CLEANER RENTAL Invoice 090414 1/5/2012 E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 188 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) Total Total Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts WIRE ROLLER FRAME & EXTENSION POLE Invoice 090420 1/5/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies STEAM CLEANER DEPOSIT CREDIT Invoice 090426 1/5/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies WHITE CABLE TIES - X -MAS LIGHTS Invoice 090430 1/5/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply FLAG TAPE Invoice 090436 1/6/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies 3V LITHIUM BATTERIES LIQUOR STORE Invoice 090442 1/6/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 189 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PIN PKS) Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 23W FLOOD LIGHTS CITY HALL Invoice 090502 1/9/2012 Total $125.00 $125.00 $1.15 $1.44 $3.08 -$1.07 $3.52 $8.12 $44.19 $6.40 $50.59 $12.81 $62.02 $49.52 $124.35 $53.95 - $10.00 $13.87 $9.59 $40.59 $108.00 $48.06 CITY OF MOUND Payments L........_._..._...__._.__ CITY OF WOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply RED & AMBER REFLECTORS Invoice 090521 1/10/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS Invoice 090524 1/10/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS Invoice 090534 1/10/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply RETURN FLOOD LIGHTS Invoice 090542 1/11/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -210 Operating Supplies SEAL TAPE, DESKTOP CALCULATOR Invoice 090551 1/11/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies LEATHER PALM GLOVES Invoice 090559 1/11/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 190 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies POLE THERMOSTAT SHOP Invoice 090611 1/13/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies CLEANERS, ROLLER COVERS Invoice 090687 1/17/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies 3 WIRE SWITCH, SOLID BLDG WIRE Invoice 090701 1/18/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies LATEX GLOVES, PAINTERS TAPE Invoice 090706 1/18/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies SEAL FOAM, DISH TABS Invoice 090723 1/19/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply TEFLON TAPE, SHOWER HEAD Invoice 090809 1/24/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies ALMOND 1830 Invoice 090913 1/27/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 60249450 -223 Building Repair Supplies SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS Invoice 090916 1/27/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 191 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) Cash Payment E 60249450 -210 Operating Supplies 9V & AA BATTERIES, LYSOL Invoice 090601 1/13/2012 Cash Payment E 60249450 -230 Shop Materials 3 WIRE SWITCH Invoice 090677 1/17/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 60249450 -230 Shop Materials 3 WIRE SWITCH RETURN Invoice 090708 1/18/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials SNOW SCOOP Invoice 090875 1/26/2012 Cash Payment E 60249450 -210 Operating Supplies PAINT STRAINER, DRILL BIT Invoice 090968 1/30/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 60249450 -210 Operating Supplies GALV COULING STOP Invoice 090991 1/31/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 60249450 -210 Operating Supplies SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS Invoice 091007 1/31/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 161 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED -409- 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 15 $5.96 $10.84 $26.21 - $37.38 $24.97 $12.99 $91.65 $24.57 $16.32 $4.65 $37.71 $21.88 $25.95 $16.00 $12.89 $159.97 $16.00 $53.43 - $53.43 $34.18 $4.04 $3.83 $8.42 $66.47 CITY OF MOUND 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 16 Payments j........ _ .... _ .._._._ -••-� CITY OF MOUND Current Period: February 2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -219 Safety supplies 5 DIGITAL POWER TASER MAGAZINES- 3 $198.26 W /EXTENDED BATTERY Invoice 108059 1/31/2012 PO 23830 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $198.26 Refer 162 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -219 Safety supplies 10 TASER CARTRIDGES 25 FT $262.47 Invoice 107232 1/25/2012 PO 23827 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $262.47 Refer 164 VIKING TROPHIES, AWARDS & RE Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -430 Miscellaneous 3 PLAQUES & PLATES FOR PD $131.83 Invoice 106765 1/30/2012 PO 23822 Transaction Date 219/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $131.83 Refer 163 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $424.00 Invoice 0051612 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $88.00 Invoice 0051612 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $19.95 Invoice 0051612 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $14.00 Invoice 0051612 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $545.95 Refer 176 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE Cash Payment E 601- 49400400 Repairs & Maintenance WATERMAIN SERVICE @6001 HWY 15 1-4- $258.25 12 Invoice 2955 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $258.25 Refer 165 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $260.00 Invoice 291254 2/2/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.40 Invoice 291254 2/2/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $268.40 Refer 166 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX /POP $14.75 Invoice 395601 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,185.75 Invoice 395602 2/1/2012 Transaction Date 219/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,200.50 Refer 167 W/RTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,449.20 Invoice 855419 2/1/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,179.25 Invoice 858222 2/8/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $47.60 Invoice 858223 2/8/2012 -410- CITY OF MOUND 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $78,267.81 Payments $24,865.36 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $777.88 285 MOUND HRA CITY OF MOUND 601 WATER FUND $3,849.15 Current Period: February 2012 $71,786.31 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER 670 RECYCLING FUND Invoice 858590 2/8/2012 $245,213.61 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 168 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 697607 1/31/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 698414 2/2/2012 _ Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 169 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -381 Electric Utilities 5502 SHORELINE DR LIFT STATION ELECTRICITY THRU 1 -28 -12 Invoice 407258204 1/30/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 170 XCEL ENERGY _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities 4783 ISLAND VIEW DR LIFT STATION ELECTRICITY THRU 1 -28 -12 Invoice 407260382 1/30/2012 _ Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 171 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities SHORELINE COMMERCE ST LIGHTS THRU 1- 25-12 Invoice 407084936 1/27/2012 Transaction Date 2/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $78,267.81 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $24,865.36 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $777.88 285 MOUND HRA $125.00 601 WATER FUND $3,849.15 602 SEWER FUND $71,786.31 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $51,261.89 670 RECYCLING FUND $14,280.21 $245,213.61 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $245,213.61 Total $245,213.61 -411- 02/09/12 1:04 PM Page 17 $208.00 $685.35 $2,023.17 $2,708.52 $218.06 $109.55 $109.55 $1,054.47 $1,054.47 EERCD L. Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska. MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448-8838 • Fax (952) 448-8805 ; j, www.botton-menk.com February 8, 2012 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project City Project Nos. PW- 11-0 1, 11 -02, 11-04 Pay Request No. 7 Dear Ms. Hanson: I r*-44=0 Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 7 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work completed on the 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from November 26, 2011 through February 7, 2012. We have reviewed the contractor's request and verified quantities. In addition, I have reduced the 5 percent retainage to 3 percent as the retained amount, $108, 251-23, is sufficient to insure completion of all remaining contract items. I therefore recommend payment in the amount of $84,498.64 to GMH Asphalt Corporation. Sincerely, BOLTON &MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance FAMOUNW12101482fty EstimatesUr of Recdn, Pay Request 7-doc DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is - -412-' 1 oppollunity employer DATE: 202012 CONTRAMONS PAY REQUEST NO. 7 CONTRACTOR GMH ASO" Corp. 2011 STREET IMPROVEMENTS OWNER Cky Of Mound CITY PROJECT 1409. PW-11-01. 11-02,11-04 ENG94EER Bollon & Menk M PROJECT NO. 012.1101442 FOR WORK COMKEM FROM -10=1,THROMH VM2 TOTAL AMOUNT 810 . . ................... . .,...........». »...,..... »......» ..«. ......... . ................. - $ 3.634,207.28 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS NO. I WW NO. 2 ............ ,'L ........................ .......................... ....... $ CURRENTCQNTRACTAMOUINT .. .... ............................. I ................... -1 ...... I .... ..................... ... ........ $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK 70 DATE »..-. » »......» .,..» ....._..._ ........ ..... ».... ». »..................... TOTAL. SMA90 MATERIALS TO . ...... ............ ............ 1— ................... ... $ DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIAL$ USED IN WORK COMPtjETED------- . . ........... . . ...... $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORM MATERIALS---................»..»_........... . »,............................ RETAINED PERCENTAGE 3% ) ............ . ....... . ............ . . . . ...... . ........... . . ..... TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS................ .... ...........................».»».... ................ »............,. NET AMOUNT ME TO CONTRACTOR 70 ........ . .............................. . TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES »... »................ » »..... . ......... S PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESMMATE NO. 7 ...... . . ....... . .. . .......... .........»..................... ............ . . ............ S Comdata kr Payment I hereby carft OvA to the best of my laiw4afto and beftef all items quan1des and prices ofwo* and m shown an Ode Eeftaft we cormot and that all work has ban poftmed In full ocoardence with iM tams, and corAllone of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undlersWod Contractor, and as amended by any auftahmd changes. and that the foregoing is a tue and correct statement of the amourA for the FM Estimaite, that the provisilone of M. S. 290.92 have been owWW with " Met all dahns against me by reason of ft Contract have bow paid or s"actortly secured. Contractor GMH Asphalt C"Wafon 9180 Lake Town Road By NOW— Title Date '0 —g2.f —11 CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & M&4K, INC., ENGINEERS, 2538 SHADOW . L 200, CHASKA MN 55318 By PROJECT ENGINEER Darvial L Faulkner Date '2-6_412 APPROVED FOR PAYMENT. 0~ CITY OF MOUND By Name Two oats -413- $11=99 3=560M 3.80,374A4 3AKS?4.44 10001,23 3MA12Ut 3,416,82447 $4.498;64 • BO L & NA -= N K Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com February 9, 2012 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Island View Dr. — Windsor Rd. Watermain Loop Project City Project No. PW -12 -07 Award of Bid Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: I NC® Five quotes were received by the specified time of 12:00p.m., February 8, 2012, and the results are listed below. As you recall, our Preliminary Engineering estimate for the construction of this project was $96,600 which is below the statutory limit of $100,000 which requires public improvement projects to be publically advertised and bid. BIDDER BID AMOUNT 1. Minncomm Utility Construction Company $95,817.50 2. Minger Construction, Inc. $115,170.55 3. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $127,303.00 4. EBI Drilling, Inc. $135,293.68 5. Geislinger & Sons, Inc. $161,880.00 The low bidder, Minncomm Utility Construction Company, is out of Mora, MN and has done a considerable amount of work throughout the State and is well qualified to successfully complete the City of Mound's watermain loop project. While the specifications for this work require the contractor to substantially complete the project by June 15, 2012, the direction drilling portion of the project would typically be done under frozen conditions. This allows the contractor to access both ends of the project across the frozen pond. I have spoken with the contractor and it is their intent to do the direction drilling work under frozen conditions and hopefully begin in late February. This portion of the project would be done within approximately two weeks. It is our recommendation that the Island View Drive — Windsor Road Watermain Loop project be awarded to Minncomm Utility Construction Company in the amount of $95,817.50. An approving resolution is included for the Council's consideration. Sincerely, BOLTON , &� QMENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer HAM0UN\C12103254\Bids\Award of Contract Ltr of Recdn.doc DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an Pn»A1 opportunity employer -414- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE ISLAND VIEW DRIVE TO WINDSOR ROAD WATERMAIN LOOP PROJECT WHEREAS, on December 13, 2011, the City Council approved solicitation of quotes for the Island View Drive to Windsor Road Watermain Loop Project; and WHEREAS, the following quotes were received on February 8, 2012: Bidder Total Amount Minncomm Utility Construction Company $ 95,817.50 Minger construction $115,170.55 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $127,303.00 EBI Drilling, Inc. $135,293.68 Geislinger & Sons, Inc. $161,880.00 and, WHEREAS, the engineer's estimate for this project is $96,600, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to award the contract for the Island View Drive to Windsor Road Watermain Loop Project to Minncomm Utility Construction Company of Mora, MN, in the amount of $95,817.50. Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of February, 2012. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -415- CITY OF MOUND — PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 PUBLIC LANDS RED ^D'r TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Jim Fackler, Public Works Katie Hoff, Dock Administrat DATE: January 20, 2012 SUBJECT: Public Lands Permit Application APPLICANT: Deborah Byrens Hagberg LOCATION: 2851 Cambridge Lane REQUEST: City Code Section 62 -11 regulates use of public lands in the City of Mound and states that construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, is unlawful unless a special construction on public land permit is issued. The applicants, Deborah Byrens Hagberg, is requesting a Public Lands Permit to remove four basswood trees and trimming one sugar maple tree along Wychwood Common adjacent to her property. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Public Works Superintendent 1. Tree work is to be at the applicant's expense. 2. A licensed tree contractor in the City of Mound must perform the work. 3. Staff, Jim Fackler, Public Works Superintendent, must be notified as to the time and date the work will be performed. 4. All cut tree wood and branches must be removed from Wychwood Common. SITE INSPECTION City Officials and Commission Members are encouraged to visit the site prior to the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this permit with conditions noted above. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Required. Propose date; February 14, 2012 -416- ATTACHMENTS: • Public Lands Permit Application dated January 20, 2012 • Concept plan • Copies of plat. • Photographs -417- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR TREE REMOVAL & TRIMMING AT 2851 CAMBRIDGE LANE WHEREAS, the applicant, Deborah Byrnes Hagberg, 2851 Cambridge Lane, is seeking a Public Lands Permit to undertake removal of four basswood trees and trimming one sugar maple tree on a portion of Wychwood Common adjacent to her property. WHEREAS, City Code Section 62 -11, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and WHEREAS, details regarding the request are contained in the Public Lands Permit Report dated January 20, 2012; and WHEREAS, based on its review, Staff recommended approval of the Public Lands Permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of Tuesday February 14, 2012. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the Public Lands Permit as submitted by Deborah Byrnes Hagberg to conduct tree removal and trimming as outlined in her Public Lands Application dated January 20, 2012 with the following conditions;. 1) Tree work to be at the applicant's expense. 2) A licensed tree contractor in the City of Mound must perform the work. 3) Staff, Jim Fackler, Public Works Superintendent, must be notified as to the time and date the work will be performed. 4) All cut tree wood and branches must be removed from Wychwood Common. Adopted by the City Council this 14TH day of February 2012. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -418- Mayor Mark Hanus Dec 2311 12:51 p 763 - 576 -3931 p.1 AnPUBLIC LANDS a,cuaywooaaaaa.uno��nd,alu 55364 APPLICATION AmmQ04;2.0600 Fex9W-4 Date Received 1— � 1�_ Parks and Open Space Commission Date . City. Council Date Docks and Commons Commission Date DISTRIBUTION Building Official Parks Director DNNRR MCWD L, Public Works Other Cho& one ❑ CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT — new construction: NOTE NO PERMIT SHAM BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND - City Code Section 62 -11(a) & (b). ❑ PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT — to allow repairs to an existing structure - City Code Section 62- 11(c). ❑ CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE — to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is' condition - City Code Section 62- 11(g). LAND ALTERATION — change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc. - City Code Section 62- 11(d). he structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly awned lands. Structures like boat houses. patios, beds, etc. are alt NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conFflrmance, which leans that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. AN permits are ranted for a limited time and are non= transferable. Stairway constriction must meet the State Building Code when the ermk is for new construction. or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please trine or Print lealbly APPLICANT Name .e- b0jr -lk 5W es -l-�9 F_tnall JeWCA2261en wwr9.c aril firr ,� € u %J v Address L- 85 � L (� #�'n. ;if f C ct f Phone (H) 763 -`7--1701 (W) ABUTTING Address PROPERTY i � 38 LEGAL Lot Stock DESC. Subdivision yG , wo 0 ci #P �� / 10423 Zoning: R1 R. 1A R2 R3 B1 82 83 (Circle one) PID Pubic Lands Pont Applkaition P208 t of 2 , Revised 312312010 -419- �V-7 Dec 2311 12:52p 763-576-3931 p.2 PUBLIC Name 4e, Cf, Email PROPERTY Dock Site # W I PC, L,-,,'oj4 4v Shoreline Type CONTRACTOR Nam Address Ad e,,, -de � Al 0 (A M C( Phone (H) _(w '15 2--q77- — A FEE OF $200.00 APPLIES IF VALUATION: OF PROJECT EXCEEDS $1,000.00 AND NO PUBLIC BENEFIT IS DERIVED. PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) 0.00 DESCRIBE REQUEST &PURPOSE C sA 0 d'e' j Y\ e4m o ve-J 0� -7, sc U- Applicant's Signatu. 4�1' Dabs Public Lands Pam* AWkmdon Ps" 2 of 2 Revised 312312010 -420- Hennepin County Property Map Hennepin County Property Locator Zoom In 9 Zoom Out ® Pan / Move Fe identify F Clear Map Print a Overview Legnend Y Help S �kro* 4591 238o zags 2351 S3Se A951 ..4982 BEop6 RD �Q� 2355 2354 4961 About the application Parcels updated on: 12/3/2011 Welcome to Hennepin County's Property Locator. To begin using the application either search by (PID, Address, Additon or Twp Rng -Sec) using the "Quick Search" commands or simply navigate to the desired location using the "Map Tools ". For more detailed information click on the Help Buttonl Although extensive effort has been made to produce error free and complete data, all geographic information has limitations due to the scale, resolution, date and interpretation of the original source materials. You should consult available data documentation (metadatal for these oarticular data to determine their limitations Copyright ® 2011 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www.Hennepin.us Accessibility Policvl Contact Hennepin Countvl Security /Privacy Statement -421- Page I of I Legend Help H 1) Click For Tax Info. 2) Click For Birds Eve 3) Click For Community Info. 4) Show Other Map Features ADDRESS: PID: 2411724420023 House #: 2851 Street Name: CAMBRIDGE LA Unit: City: MOUND Zip: 55364 OWNER /TAXPAYER: MARILYN HAWLEY Owner: BYRNES ET AL MARILYN HAWLEY Taxpayer: BYRNES 910 WESTERN ST ANOKA MN 55303 TAX DISTRICT: School #: 277 Sewer #: Watershed #: 3 PARCEL: ALta: (Srg5j 0.10 Area: (So. Feet) 4319 Torrens /Abstract:TORRENS Addition Name: WYCHWOOD Lot #: 010 Block #: 038 Mates ✓$ Bounds http: / /gis.co. hennepin. nm.us /HCPropertyMap/Locator.aspx ?PID = 2411724420023 12/28/2011 10 ffn' ii yid /i �Xl' 6 = f � lBQI #nw �a « � , � ~�� \ / »� - / . |� � /� . a �� / \*/ ` \ �/ # � � © | � \� «,� .� .� \� ..� \ ^ � : 2 ;\ \ƒ - . � . A Fage 1 Ot 1 Jim Fackler From: Rick Hagberg [rickhagberg @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:36 PM To: Jim Fackler Cc: 'Debbie Hagberg' Subject: Byrnes / Hagberg Tree Trimming Attachments: 2851 Cambridge Lane Trees A.jpg; 2851 Cambridge Lane Trees B.jpg; 2851 Cambridge Ln Trees Lot Locations.pdf; 2851 Cambridge Lane Trees C.jpg Mr. Fackler, We're sorry for the delay providing you with details of the tree trimming project we are proposing. We had to begin working with a different tree service to meet the licensing requirements which took a little more time. We plan to use Bear Tree Care. Attached are photos illustrating the project. After consulting with Bear, we propose removing one more tree than originally planned. Bear wants to complete the project while the lake is frozen. In the attached photos, the basswood trees proposed for removal are marked A, B, C and D, and are flagged with yellow tape. In addition we propose removing one limb from the sugar maple marked E. One of the basswoods has a decaying cavity, and the others are blocking light from reaching the bank where we hope to begin growing native vegetation to help prevent erosion. The cost has increased from the original application from $300 to $400. Thanks very much for your assistance with the project. Don't hesitate to ask if you would like additional information. Sincerely, Debbie & Rick Hagberg (for Marilyn Byrnes) rickhagberg @gmail.com 763 - 458 -6007 Rick cell 763 - 427 -1701 home -426- 1/20/2012 MEMORANDUM Date: February 7, 2012 To: City Manager and City Council From: Dean Mooney, Police Chief y, �) Subject: Approval of Human Service Contracts I am requesting Council approval of the attached Professional Services Agreements with Corner House and Sojourner Project. The funding for these agreements was provided in the FY — 12 Police Budget. Both agreements have been reviewed by our City Attorney, and signed by the providers and are now ready for Council action. We have long standing relationships with each of these organizations that provide needed services to the Police Department. Sojourner Project serves victims of Domestic Violence by providing advocacy and shelter services. Corner House provides medical services and skilled interview services for victims of Child Abuse. We have found their services to be of highest quality and frequently needed throughout the year. I am requesting Council approval for the Mayor to enter into the accompanying agreements with Sojourner Project and Corner House. -427- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SOJOURNER PROJECT, INC. This Professional Services Agreement ( "Agreement ") is made effective as of the day of January, 2012 by and between the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City ") and the Sojourner Project, Inc., a Minnesota non - profit corporation ( "Provider"). WHEREAS, the Provider is a non - profit organization focused on community -based domestic violence legal advocacy and intervention services for incidents arising in the west suburban area including Mound, Minnesota; WHEREAS, the Provider agrees to provide community -based domestic violence legal advocacy and intervention services for the City; WHEREAS, the City believes that the provision of Provider's community -based domestic violence legal advocacy and intervention services to City residents promotes public health, safety, morals, and the general welfare; WHEREAS, the City agrees to engage the professional services of the Provider on the terms set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to set forth in writing the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in return for the mutual agreements set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012 regardless of the dates of execution, unless terminated earlier as provided herein. 2. SERVICES The Provider shall provide the required personnel and related support services and supplies to intervene in domestic abuse incidents that arise in the City, consistent with the past practices and procedures between the parties. These services shall include advocacy for and meetings with the victims, and follow -up services. The Provider shall not provide services for defendants charged with domestic assault, fifth degree assault, disorderly conduct, or order for protection violations. The City agrees to cooperate with the Provider as deemed appropriate by the City's Chief of Police to ensure the timely provision of Provider's services. Recipients of Provider's services shall not be financially charged. Would -be recipients of Provider's services may decline Provider's services. 3. TRAINING As deemed appropriate by the City's Chief of Police, the City will make its Police Department personnel available for training with respect to the aims and procedures of the intervention program described in this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT The Provider shall record the number of cases referred to it by the City. On a quarterly basis, the Provider shall submit a record to the City, which contains the following information: a. The number of adult cases referred by the City, designated by the name of the abuser; and -428 - DOCS43622658 -v2 i b. The number of hours and services provided to Provider's clients with blind numbers so the confidentiality of service recipients can be maintained. The City agrees to pay a total amount of $3,500.00 for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the amount paid by the City for the services under this Agreement is less than the costs incurred by the Provider in furnishing the services. Provider's service rate is $45.00 per hour and therefore 78 hours is agreed to be the maximum hours to be provided for the rate of $3,500.00. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Provider agrees to continue providing the services specified in Section 2 herein after the maximum payment level has been reached. These continued services shall be at no further cost to the City, nor will any credit be issued if service levels do not reach $3,500.00. Payment will be made by the City upon invoice by the Provider. 5. RECORDS The Provider shall maintain such records as are deemed necessary by the City to insure that the services are provided as represented by the Provider. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Provider shall have each employee maintain records of time spent on each referred case; however the records shall remain the Provider's property. The Provider shall maintain the records in a manner that insures confidentiality to service recipients; however, the Provider shall provide disclosure of identities to the City if so required by law or regulation. 6. DISCRIMINATION The Provider agrees not to discriminate in providing services under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, or religion. 7. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time with or without cause, upon thirty days written notice as provided in Section 13 herein. In that case, City shall only pay for services rendered in accordance with this Agreement before the termination date. 8. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Providers shall use best efforts to meet all professional obligations to avoid conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety. In the event of a conflict, the Provider, with the consent of the City, shall arrange for suitable alternative representation. It is the intent of the Provider to refrain from handling matters for any other person or entity that may pose a conflict of interest, or may not be in the best interests of the City. 9. UNSPECIFIED SERVICE The City will honor no claim for services not specified in this Agreement. 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT The entire agreement of the parties is contained in this document, Exhibit A and any addenda or amendments signed by the parties. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement is valid only when signed by both parties. 11. AMENDMENT Any amendment of the Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. 12. ASSIGNMENT DOCS - #3622658 -v2 -429- 2 The rights and obligations created by this Agreement are assignable only by the written consent of both parties to this Agreement. 13. NOTICES. All notices required to be given by either party pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and sent to the other party at the following addresses: To the City: City of Mound Police Department Attention: Chief of Police 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55384 To the Provider: The Sojourner Project, Inc. Attn: Executive Director P.O. Box 272 Hopkins, MN 55343 All notices shall be deemed received when delivered, if hand - delivered, or three business days after deposit with the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid. Notices by fax or email alone are not sufficient. The addresses for notices may be changed by the parties from time to time by delivery of written notice to the other party as provided herein. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS Nothing in this Agreement is intended, nor shall be construed, to create the relationship of partners or employer /employee between the parties. The Provider, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers are, and shall remain for all purposes and services under this Agreement, independent contractors. 15. INSURANCE The Provider shall maintain the following insurance coverage during the term of this Agreement: a. Worker's Compensation Insurance as set forth in Exhibit B; and b. Professional, automobile, general liability and property insurance in amounts and in forms satisfactory to the City; and the Provider, Inc. shall list the City as an additional insured on all such policies. For insurance requirements, refer to Exhibit B. 16. INDEMNIFICATION The Provider does hereby, for itself and its successors and assigns, release and agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from all Loss or Damage in any manner, directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from, the Provider's provision of facilities, programs and services pursuant to this Agreement. The term "Loss or Damage" as used herein means all losses, costs, expenses (including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, disbursements of counsel and costs of investigation), liabilities, damages, debts, fees, fines, penalties, charges, assessments, judgments, liens, settlements, claims, demands, rights, actions, suits, causes of action, and proceedings, and other obligations of any nature whatsoever and of any person whomsoever, including for death or injury to any person (including the parties and their employees, agents, and contractors). The indemnity obligations contained in this Section shall survive termination of this Agreement. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as a waiver of any liability limits or immunities contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. -430 - DOCS- #3622658 -v2 3 EXHIBIT A General Liability: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $1,000,000 Personal Injury/Advertising Injury $2,000,000 Products /Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate $100,000 Damage to Rented Premises $5,000 Medical Payments (optional) Auto Liability: $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit — Bodily Injury & Property Damage $1,000,000 Hired & Non -Owned Auto Liability Workers' Compensation: $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Policy Limit $100,000 Each Disease Statutory Limits Apply Umbrella /Excess Liability: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence and Annual Aggregate -431 - DOCS43622658 -v2 5 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CORNERHOUSE This Professional Services Agreement ( "Agreement ") is made effective as of the day of January, 2012 by and between the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City ") and the CornerHouse, a Minnesota non - profit corporation ( "Provider"). WHEREAS, the Provider is a non - profit organization focused on ensuring voices of children are heard and understood in cases of alleged child abuse; WHEREAS, the Provider is a Children's Advocacy Center that provides forensic interviews and medical services in a child- and vulnerable adult- friendly environment; WHEREAS, the Provider's child advocacy services are provided to children, teens, and vulnerable adults. The Provider's child advocacy services support a coordinated multidisciplinary team response to the investigation of alleged abuse, when children, teens, and vulnerable adults have been witnesses to violent crimes. The Provider's child advocacy services minimize trauma, suggestibility, and the number of interviews that an alleged victim is subject to as part of the investigative process; WHEREAS, the Provider agrees to provide child advocacy services for the City; WHEREAS, the City believes that the provision of Provider's child advocacy services to City residents promotes public health, safety, morals, and the general welfare; WHEREAS, the City agrees to engage the professional services of the Provider on a fee for service basis; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to set forth in writing the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in return for the mutual agreements set forth below, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM The term of this Agreement shall be from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, regardless of the dates of execution, unless terminated earlier as provided below. 2. SERVICES The Provider shall provide the necessary personnel and related support services and supplies to provide interview and medical services to clients referred by the City of Mound Police Department as set forth in CornerHouse Statement of Services -2012, and hereby incorporated in this Agreement as EXHIBIT A. 3. TRAINING As deemed appropriate by the City's Chief of Police, the City will make its Police Department personnel available for training with respect to the aims and procedures of CornerHouse as described in EXHIBIT A to this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT The Provider shall record the number of cases referred to it by the City. On a quarterly basis, the Provider shall submit a record to the City, which contains the following information: a. The number of cases referred by the City, -432 - 397372v2 MJNI MU220 -2 1 b. The number of hours and services provided to client with blind numbers so the confidentiality of service recipients can be maintained. The City Agrees to pay a total amount of $ 1,982.42 for the entire term of this Agreement. The Provider agrees to continue providing the services specified in Section 2 herein after the maximum payment level has been reached. These continued services shall be at no further cost to the City. Payment will be made by the City upon invoice by the Provider. 5. RECORDS The Provider shall maintain such records as are deemed necessary by the City to insure that the services are provided as represented by the Provider. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Provider shall have each employee maintain records of time spent on each referred case; however the records shall remain the Provider's property. The Provider shall maintain the records in a manner that insures confidentiality to service recipients; however the Provider shall provide disclosure of identities to the City if so required by law or regulation. 6. DISCRIMINATION The Provider agrees not to discriminate in providing services under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, or religion. 7. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party at any time with or without cause, upon thirty days written notice as provided in Section 13 herein. In that case, City shall only pay for services rendered in accordance with this Agreement before the termination date. B. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The Providers shall use best efforts to meet all professional obligations to avoid conflicts of interest and appearances of impropriety. In the event of a conflict, the Provider, with the consent of the City, shall arrange for suitable alternative representation. It is the intent of the Provider to refrain from handling matters for any other person or entity that may pose a conflict of interest, or may not be in the best interests of the City. 9. UNSPECIFIED SERVICE The City will honor no claim for services not specified in this Agreement. 10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT The entire agreement of the parties is contained in this document, Exhibits A and B, and any addenda or amendments signed by the parties. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement is valid only when signed by both parties. 11. AMENDMENT Any amendment of the Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. 12. ASSIGNMENT The rights and obligations created by this Agreement are assignable only by the written consent of both parties to this Agreement. 13. NOTICES All notices required to be given by either party pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and sent to the other party at the following addresses: -433 - 397372v2 MJM MU220 -2 2 To the City: City of Mound Police Department Attention: Chief of Police 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55384 To the Provider: CornerHouse Attn: Executive Director 2502 10th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55404 -4510 All notices shall be deemed received when delivered, if hand - delivered, or three business days after deposit with the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid. Notices by fax or email alone are not sufficient. The addresses for notices may be changed by the parties from time to time by delivery of written notice to the other party as provided herein. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS Nothing in this Agreement is intended, nor shall be construed, to create the relationship of partners or employer /employee between the parties. The Provider, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers are, and shall remain for all purposes and services under this Agreement, independent contractors. 15. INSURANCE The Provider shall maintain the following insurance coverage during the term of this Agreement: a. Worker's Compensation Insurance in compliance with Exhibit B; and b. Professional, automobile, general liability, and property insurance in amounts and in forms satisfactory to the City, and the Provider shall include the City as an additional insured on all such policies. For insurance requirements, refer to Exhibit B. 16. INDEMNIFICATION The Provider does hereby, for itself and its successors and assigns, release and agree to defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless from all Loss or Damage in any manner, directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from, or in any manner connected with this Agreement, the provision of facilities, programs and services pursuant to this Agreement. The term "Loss or Damage" as used herein means all losses, costs, expenses (including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, disbursements of counsel and costs of investigation), liabilities, damages; debts, fees, fines, penalties, charges, assessments, judgments, liens, settlements, claims, demands, rights, actions, suits, causes of action, and proceedings, and other obligations of any nature whatsoever and of any person whomsoever, including for death or injury to any person (including the parties and their employees, agents, and contractors) and including damage to property owned by, leased, rented to, or in the care, custody, or control of the parties and including damage to the environment or natural resources. The indemnity obligations contained in this Section shall survive termination of this Agreement. Nothing in this Section shall be construed as a waiver of any liability limits or immunities contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. 17. DATA PRACTICES ACT COMPLIANCE Data and information provided to the Provider under this Agreement or through provision of services for the City shall be administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, and all data on individuals shall be maintained in accordance with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. -434 - 397372v2 MJM MU220 -2 3 18. APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and CornerHouse have executed this Professional Services Agreement effective as of the date first written above. City of Mound M Mark Hanus, Mayor CornerHouse B Executive Director Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -435- 397372x2 MJM MU220 -2 4 EXHIBIT A (Insert) 397372v2 MJM MU220 -2 -4536- EXHIBIT B General Liability: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $1,000,000 Personal Injury/Advertising Injury $2,000,000 Products /Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Annual Aggregate $100,000 Damage to Rented Premises $5,000 Medical Payments (optional) Auto Liability: $1,000,000 Combined Single Limit — Bodily Injury & Property Damage $1,000,000 Hired & Non -Owned Auto Liability Workers' Compensation: $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Policy Limit $100,000 Each Disease Statutory Limits Apply Umbrella /Excess Liability: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence and Annual Aggregate -437 - 397372v2 MJM MU220 -2 6 Statement of Services - 2012 The mission of CornerHouse is to ensure that the voices of children are heard and understood in cases of alleged child abuse. CornerHouse is a Children's Advocacy Center that provides forensic interviews and medical services in a child - friendly environment. Services are provided to children, teens and vulnerable adults. ComerHouse supports a coordinated, multidisciplinary team response to the investigation of alleged abuse and when children, teens and vulnerable adults have been witnesses to violent crimes in the interest of minimizing trauma, suggestibility and the number of interviews an alleged victim is subject to as a part of the investigative process. The multidisciplinary team consists of CornerHouse staff, law enforcement and child or adult protection investigators, an Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, CornerHouse medical staff, and, when applicable, investigative staff of licensing agencies. The Mound Police Department has engaged CornerHouse for the year 2012 and paid CornerHouse at a mutually agreed upon fee for interview services as provided herein. This document further outlines forensic interview and medical services provided at the CornerHouse facility. The following outlines the process for our work together as a part of this agreement: INTERVIEW SERVICES CornerHouse staff will provide forensic interviews for children and teens (under the age of eighteen) and vulnerable adults who are referred by the Mound Police Department when there is reason to believe that the person may have been a victim of abuse or witnessed violent crime, and case circumstances meet CornerHouse's intake criteria. Intake: In order to provide the highest quality of services to children, vulnerable adults and families, CornerHouse staff members require referral information to determine the appropriateness of a CornerHouse interview. The following case considerations and procedures will be utilized in assessing the immediacy of a case for scheduling purposes. • Level I (Emergency): CornerHouse will attempt to schedule interviews within 24 hours of receiving an intake in the following circumstances: • Offender Access: Child or vulnerable adult could be victimized and remains at immediate risk due to alleged offender access. • Non - Offender Concerns: Non - offending caretaker of a child or vulnerable adult is blaming, shaming, urging the child or vulnerable adult to recant, or is emotionally abusive to a child or vulnerable adult. • Safety of Other Children) or Vulnerable Adult(s): Alleged offender in caretaker role of, or has access to, other child(ren) or vulnerable adult(s) at risk (i.e., siblings, students, day care, foster care, group home). • • Child or Vulnerable Adult Witness of Violent Crime (i.e., homicide, assault): Interview of a child or vulnerable adult witness may be considered an emergency. Screening must occur regarding the child's or vulnerable adult's trauma level and ability to be interviewed. 36 -Hour Arrests: Alleged offender has been arrested on probable cause and alleged offender release is pending results of interview. • 72 -Hour Hold: Alleged victim is held in protective custody and return is pending results of interview. • Level H (Priority): CornerHouse will attempt to schedule interviews within 72 hours of receiving intake in the following circumstances: • 72 -Hour Hold: Alleged victim is held in protective custody and the hold may be extended during investigation. CornerHouse will coordinate with referring professionals to accommodate court- imposed deadlines. • Perpetrator Access: Alleged offender visits denied pending investigation. The following circumstances may require further evaluation by CornerHouse intake staff: • Recantation: The dynamic of recanting is always possible and often likely. Concern that the alleged victim will recant allegations, in the absence of a clear indication of recantation, is not criteria for an emergency interview. • Language Skills: Referring professional will need to assess alleged victim's language skill level at the time of intake and indicate any developmental delays or need for interpretive services. CornerHouse will provide interpreter services as needed for children, developmentally disabled adults and accompanying caregivers whose primary language is not English. • Under the age of 3: If a child being referred for a forensic interview is between the ages of two- years, eight- months and three - years -old, the following questions will be asked of the referent at the time of intake or referral: ■ specifics of disclosure and words used by the child in the disclosure; ■ questions asked of the child; and ■ child's ability to communicate. If these questions cannot be answered at the time of intake or referral, the investigator will be requested by ComerHouse staff to observe the child and report back. The above three items will be considered in staff member's decision to interview children under three. Routinely, children under three will be scheduled for a Multi- Session Interview, which is an extended interview process. Multi- Session Criteria: If the following criteria are met, the interview will be routinely scheduled as a multi- session interview process: Age and ability of client • Children three - years -of -age or younger; • Children four- and five - years -of -age who have disabilities or who are multi - lingual and /or need the use of an interpreter; or • Any child or vulnerable adult who has special needs that could best be facilitated by an extended interview process. • Availability of a non - offending caregiver or other adult who has knowledge about the client's abilities so the Forensic Interviewer may gather information pertinent to the unique needs of the client. • Priority Level interviews. In cases where Emergency Level criteria exist, efforts will be made to utilize the multi- session process. 2 -439- The following case circumstances do not meet intake criteria for a CornerHouse forensic interview; in these cases, CornerHouse may recommend a referral for a psychosocial evaluation: Too Young: Children under the chronological age of 32 months (2 years, 8 months). No Disclosure: Children or vulnerable adults who demonstrate sexualized behavior (i.e., unusual masturbation, age- inappropriate sexual knowledge, peer sexual contact) in the absence of disclosure by the child or vulnerable adult clearly indicating abuse (i.e., who did what to whom). Previously Interviewed: Children, teens or vulnerable adults who have been previously interviewed (asked details of incident by an investigative professional) regarding the same incident or allegation. CornerHouse recognizes that multiple interviews have been linked to fact contamination and emotional trauma of children. Recognizina that disclosure is a process, a therapeutic referral is generally preferred when additional details of the same event surface after a forensic interview has been conducted. As needed, individual case circumstances may be discussed to determine if a forensic interview is in the best interest of the child or vulnerable adult. On rare occasions, at the request of investigators, CornerHouse may agree to conduct forensic interviews with clients who do not meet the usual intake criteria. The CornerHouse forensic interview process used with children and vulnerable adults will be a coordinated, neutral and fact- finding exchange. The forensic interview is conducted as one component of an investigation by law enforcement and /or child or adult protection services. A CornerHouse Forensic Interviewer will be assigned to conduct an interview at the first available and appropriate time. Goals: The goals of the forensic interview process are: 1. To determine whether a child /vulnerable adult has had an abusive, exploitative, or otherwise traumatic experience. 2. To allow for a safe, supportive forum in which to share his /her experience. 3. To reduce the trauma of the investigation for the alleged victim. 4. To maximize the information obtained from the alleged victim about his/her experience. 5. To minimize contamination of the alleged victim's memory of the event(s). 6. To minimize the number of times the alleged victim is interviewed. 7. To facilitate investigative and follow -up efforts between relevant parties. 8. To maximize each alleged victim's competency by utilizing an approach that meets her/his unique needs. Methods: These goals will be accomplished in the following manner: 1) Coordinated Approach: When both a Mound Police Department representative and a child protection /adult protection representative are involved in the investigation, CornerHouse will accept a referral from either party with the understanding that the Mound Police Department and child /adult protection representatives will coordinate the scheduling of the interview to ensure greatest participation from both parties. Whenever possible, all investigative parties and an assistant county attorney shall be present during the forensic interview process. At least one referent must be present for the interview to be conducted. In the rare case in which a multidisciplinary team ( "MDT ") member is unable to attend the interview, s /he will have access to the video - recorded interview and a written summary. Additionally, the missing member is responsible for communicating with the other team members if further information or clarification is required. This coordinated approach seeks to minimize the number of interviews conducted with the alleged victim, reduce possible trauma, and maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of the investigative process. Alleged perpetrators cannot transport clients or be present at CornerHouse during an interview. ki -440- a) Pre - interview Meeting: A MDT meeting will be held prior to the ComerHouse interview. This meeting will be facilitated by the ComerHouse interviewer and may include the following team members: child /adult protection investigator(s); law enforcement investigator(s); assistant county attorney (as assigned); ComerHouse physician; Minnesota Department of Education investigator(s); Minnesota Department of Human Services investigator(s), and other professionals identified as necessary by the team. The purpose of this MDT pre - interview meeting is to share basic information related to the allegation, the alleged victim's abilities, and case related issues. b) Post-interview Meeting: A MDT meeting will be held immediately following the ComerHouse interview. The meeting will be facilitated by the interviewer and, in addition to team members participating in the pre - interview meeting, may also include the ComerHouse Family Support Service Coordinator. At the post- interview MDT meeting, information will be shared pertaining to the future direction of the investigation(s), services to the alleged victim and family, and medical and therapeutic recommendations. C) Multi - victim Cases: When more than one victim is at ComerHouse to be interviewed regarding the same case, an effort will be made to utilize different interviewers for each interview. Whenever possible, all interviewers involved in a given case should be involved in the pre - interview MDT meeting. Essential information may be relayed to subsequent interviewer between interviews. d) Interview Observation: Investigators and the assistant county attomey will observe the interview in progress through closed- circuit television. The ComerHouse staff video - recording the interview will also observe. Others are prohibited from observing the forensic interview except by permission from the MDT. Caregivers do not observe forensic interviews. e) Team Participation in the Interview: Towards the end of the interview, investigators and the assistant county attomey may call the interview room to communicate additional questions to the interviewer. Ultimate discretion rests with the interviewer as to whether to ask additional questions. 2) Pre - Interview Contact with Parent/Guardian(s) and Alleged Victim Parent/guardian Meeting: The interviewer may meet briefly with the parent/guardian, outside the presence of the alleged victim to briefly review the interview process and to gather information about the overall development and unique needs. This may include the alleged victim's current comfort level and knowledge about why she /he is at ComerHouse. Pre - interview Contact with Alleged Victim: The interviewer will have minimal contact with the alleged victim outside of the confines of the interview room and off of video. If developmentally appropriate, the interviewer may show the alleged victim the interview technical room (the video monitors) en route to the interview room. Conversation will be limited to that which is necessary to facilitate the client's transition into the interview room. Under no circumstance will the interviewer initiate conversation relating to the abuse allegation prior to the formal interview. 3) Forensic Interview Process a) Interview Protocol: The ComerHouse Forensic Interview Protocol is a semi - structured interview protocol. Since this is a semi - structured process, one or more of these stages may be modified or eliminated, allowing for the developmental considerations and /or spontaneity of each client. RAPPORT: The purpose is to establish the client's: • comfort, • communication, and • competence (developmental /cognitive abilities). 4 -441- ANATOMY IDENTIFICATION: The purpose is to: • arrive at a common language regarding names for body parts, and • determine the alleged victim's understanding of and ability to distinguish between genders. TOUCH INQUIRY: The purpose is to: • assess the client's ability to understand and communicate about touch. ABUSE SCENARIO (IF APPLICABLE): The purpose is to: • allow the alleged victim to tell details of his /her abuse experience, and • explore alternative hypotheses. CLOSURE: The purpose is to: • educate the alleged victim regarding personal safety, • explore safety option, and • provide a respectful end to the interview. b) Multiple Interview Sessions: ComerHouse will utilize an extended interview process for children who meet the intake criteria. This process, known as Multi- session Interview, allows for the interview to be divided into two or more sessions in order to better meet the needs of young children, children who have disabilities, and /or children who are multi - lingual or need the use of an interpreter. This process may also be used with vulnerable adults. This process generally includes a meeting with non - offending caregivers, or other adult, who has knowledge of the alleged victim's abilities, to gather information pertinent to conducting the interview in a manner that meets the unique needs of each client. C) Process of Inquiry. ComerHouse interviews should be conducted in a manner that allows alleged victims to provide as much narrative information as possible. When more focused questions are used, there should be continued opportunities for narratives as deemed appropriate based on an individual client's presentation. Greater age and ability enhance an alleged victim's narrative performance, while decreased age and ability, as well as increased emotional trauma diminish this capacity. Questions are modified to reflect these variables. 4) Documentation: Each forensic interview will be memorialized by video recording and written forensic interview report. Children aged five years and older who are interviewed at ComerHouse will generally be informed by the interviewer that the team is watching and that the interview is being recorded. CornerHouse will provide a video recording of the interview to the Mound Police Department representative. ComerHouse will provide a written report of the interview to multidisciplinary team members. Upon request and as necessary, ComerHouse may provide additional copies of the video recording to multidisciplinary team members. ComerHouse will not provide copies of the video - recording, written report or other client records to parties outside of the multidisciplinary team unless required by law and pursuant to a subpoena. Such requests will be referred to the Mound Police Department for consideration. ComerHouse staff are available to Mound Police Department to consult in regards to the potential consequences of such release of information on a case -by -case or other basis as requested by the Mound Police Department. 5) Interviewing Children and Adults who have Special Needs: At the time of intake, all available information regarding the type and extent of any special needs is gathered. If accommodations are necessary, arrangements should be made prior to the interview. In some cases, more than one interview session may be necessary for a complete interview. 6) Witnesses/Victims of Other Crimes: ComerHouse will conduct forensic interviews of potential child and vulnerable adult witnesses to violent crime, such as sexual abuse /assault, homicide, and domestic violence. ComerHouse will conduct forensic interviews of child and vulnerable adult victims of physical abuse and neglect upon agreement of both child /adult protection and law enforcement investigators. a) Witness to Violent Crime: This is a semi - structured process and may be modified if developmentally appropriate. b) Witness to Violent Crime Protocol 5 -442- RAPPORT: The purpose is to establish the witness's: • comfort, • communication, and • competence (developmental /cognitive abilities). INCIDENT INQUIRY: The purpose is to allow the witness to tell about his /her experience. CLOSURE: The purpose is to: • explore safety options with the witness, • allow the witness to address any worries or concerns s /he may have, and • provide a respectful end to the interview. c) Victims of Physical Abuse/Neg lect. The CornerHouse protocol will be utilized and adapted to interview child, teen and vulnerable adult victims of physical abuse and neglect. 7) Vulnerable Adults: CornerHouse may interview vulnerable adults as alleged victims of physical or sexual abuse, neglect or those who may have witnessed a violent crime (see intake criteria). MEDICAL SERVICES A forensic medical examination may be scheduled with a pediatrician to be performed at ComerHouse or at another appropriate medical facility at the recommendation of the multidisciplinary team, an investigator, the forensic interviewer, or at the request of a caregiver. A Mound Police Department or child protection representative will be responsible for communicating with caregivers as appropriate regarding this appointment. The examination and supporting laboratory work will be conducted pursuant to Minn.Stat. §609.35 without cost to the child or family. Minn.Stat. §609.35 mandates that the cost will be paid for by "the county in which the criminal sexual conduct occurred." When an exam occurs at CornerHouse, billing for crimes alleged to have occurred in Hennepin County is automatically processed through the employer of the physician who completes the exam. CornerHouse staff will support and assist the physician if the examination is conducted at CornerHouse. CornerHouse will provide a copy of the physician's report to investigators. ADDITIONAL SERVICES If a CornerHouse forensic interview results in a criminal, juvenile delinquency, child protection, or administrative hearing, CornerHouse staff will cooperate and provide testimony pursuant to subpoena. CornerHouse will provide case review opportunities on a monthly basis. Multidisciplinary team members are invited and encouraged to attend. On a quarterly basis, CornerHouse will provide half day orientation training for Mound Police Department employees. CornerHouse strongly encourages all new investigators to attend to learn how to coordinate interviews and medical exams at CornerHouse. CornerHouse will provide these services with the understanding that Mound Police Department representatives are multidisciplinary team members who will keep information from the interview confidential except to the extent that sharing is allowed pursuant to Minnesota law. CornerHouse will provide Family Support Services to clients and families to the extent resources are available and appropriate. Family Support Services include in- person support, referrals for therapeutic and other services, and support through follow -up phone contact. 6 -443- At the Mound Police Department's request, CornerHouse will provide interview services for another law enforcement agency when a courtesy interview is requested by the Mound Police Department and a Mound Police Department representative is investigating the case on behalf of the other law enforcement agency. The Mound Police Department investigator must be present for the courtesy interview and must take responsibility for transferring the information [i.e., the DVD and written report] to the other law enforcement agency. The Mound Police Department is also responsible for informing the other law enforcement agency that CornerHouse will require reimbursement for any related court testimony. ... 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: February 9, 2012 Re: Action on 3070 Highland Boulevard variance application Overview. At its December 13, 2011 meeting, the Council, on split vote, directed Staff to prepare a resolution of denial to be brought back to the next Council meeting for consideration. So as to allow for additional time, which was requested by the property owner, to prepare additional information following the Dec. 13th meeting and Council member absences, the Council, at its January 10, 2012 meeting, tabled action on the resolution to the January 24, 2012 meeting. At its January 24, 2012 meeting, the Council also tabled action on the resolution following a request by the owner, William Moore. A draft resolution based on the December 13, 2011 meeting related to the matter has been included for Council action. Additionally, information provided by the applicant who has requested further consideration by the Council is also included. -445- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 12- A RESOLUTION TO DENY VARIANCE REQUEST FOR PROPERTY AT 3070 HIGHLAND BOULEVARD PLANNING CASE # 11 -13 PID NO. 23-117-24-43-0001 WHEREAS, on November 23, 2011, a variance application was submitted by Kwadow -Boadi on behalf of owners, William and Alison Moore, to construct an addition at 3070 Highland Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the subject property fronts Highland Boulevard on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side. The proposal involves construction of an addition to connect the existing detached garage, located in the northwest corner of the subject site, to the existing house; and WHEREAS, per code, there are separate setback requirements for principal and accessory structures; and WHEREAS, once the existing detached garage and house are connected by the proposed addition, the existing garage becomes an integral part of the principal structure and a 30' front setback applies which creates the need for a variance approval as described below: Required Setback Existing / Requested Setback 30 FT 8.4 FT and WHEREAS, details regarding the application are contained in Planning Report and Executive Summary No. 11 -13 and the supporting materials that were submitted with the application; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) contains the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, the variance application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its December 6, 2011 meeting who voted, eight in favor and one opposed, to recommend Council approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, at its December 13, 2011 meeting, the Council voted three in favor and two opposed to direct Staff to prepare a resolution to deny the application based on the Council's discussion to be brought back to the January 10, 2012 meeting; and -446- WHEREAS, the requested variance is not appropriate given that the Council would not approve a new construction project if it were similarly proposed for the following reasons: 1. The amount of variance has not been minimized as there is space on the property to reconfigure the accessory structures and reduce the amount of variance needed. 2. The amount of accessory structure space far exceeds any typical norm in either the neighborhood or the city as a whole for a single - family home. Development of accessory structure areas that exceed typical norms by this much should take place within city standards rather than through a variance. 3. The requested front yard setback is less than one -third (1/3) of the required setback resulting in a very large variance; and WHEREAS, on December 23, 2011, the City executed a 60 -day extension to allow for additional time to act on the application and to allow the owner adequate time to prepare additional information to be brought back to the Council. Therefore, the City's new deadline for action is on or around March 22, 2012; and WHEREAS, at its January 10, 2012 meeting, the Council voted three in favor and none opposed to table the matter to the January 24, 2012 meeting; and WHEREAS, at its January 24, 2012 meeting, the Council voted four in favor and none opposed to table the matter to the February 14, 2012 meeting, which was requested by owner William Moore; and WHEREAS, at its February 14, 2012 meeting, the City Council received additional information from the applicant, considered the resolution and voted in favor; opposed to deny the variance request and hereby makes the following findings based on the information it received at its meetings of December 10, 2011 and January 24, 2012 Council meetings: 1. Approval of the variance is precedent- setting as there are many detached accessory structures in the City that could become attached to principal structures. 2. Approval will encourage and provide a path for other property owners to circumvent the code by employing a staged building plan allowing them to ultimately build a non - conforming building that would otherwise not be approved under the code. 3. There are options other than a variance that could be considered to build a conforming project. 4. A variance would not have been granted if this were new construction based on the reasons stated above. 5. There are neither exceptional or extraordinary circumstances unique to this property which do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity, and which result from lot size, shape, topography, or other relevant circumstances. Detached accessory structures are a common feature of residential parcels throughout the city. 6. The zoning regulations for this zone, as a matter of legislative determination, have different setback requirements for accessory structures and principal structures. To permit this variance would nullify that different treatment. -447- NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. This variance application is hereby denied for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Attest: City Clerk - to be inserted - Mark Hanus, Mayor PRESERVING THE HISTORY OF WOODEN BOATING IN AMERICA The City of Mound C/O Mound City Council 5341 Maywood Dr. Mound, MN 55364 To the members of the Mound City Council, 1ECT JAN 9 2012 I am writing in support of the home improvement project by William & Alison Moore of 3070 Highland Blvd. It is my understanding that Mr. Moore is interested in connecting his house to his detached garage; however, such a structure would require a variance from the existing city code. My residence, 3056 Highland Blvd., is immediately to the East and abuts the Moore's property. Given the location of the proposed addition, my property is the only residence which has a direct view of the project. I can attest that such a variance, if granted, would have no meaningful effect on my property. The proposed project matches the exterior layout of the house, and would be an attractive complement to the existing building. I am fully in support of the town granting such variance. It is my opinion as a resident of this neighborhood that such a variance would in no way alter the essential character of this community. Sincerely, ,, r F. Todd Warner 3056 Highland Blvd. 2642 COMMERCE BOULEVARD, MOUND, MINNESOTA_A AA_4 - TEL. 952-495-0007 - WWW.MAHOGANYBAY.NET December 23, 2011 Bill and Alison Moore 3070 Highland Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Kwadwo Boadi - Aboagye 6830 Cardinal Cove Drive' Minnetrista, MN 55364 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com This letter is in regard to the variance request that was submitted on November 23, 2011 for the property at 3070 Highland Boulevard that expires on or around January 22, 2012. As provided by Minnesota Statutes 15.99, please be advised that the City of Mound is executing an extension as allowed by Minnesota Statutes 15.99, for an additional (60) days related to the City's timelines for approval or denial of the requested variance. The City's extension for action on the resolution expires on or around March 22, 2012. The purpose for the extension is to allow for additional time for Staff to prepare a resolution of denial; and to provide you with additional time to seek an opportunity to bring additional information to the City Council. if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (952) 472 -0604 or by email at sarahsmithg-Dcitvofmound.com. I will be happy to answer any questions you may have. Si rely, - ith Community Development Director -450 - 19 pfted - recycled paper In Defense of VARIANCE REQUEST 3070 Highland Blvd, Mound City of Mound, MN Planning Case 11 -13 -451- Background History The house at 3070 Highland Blvd. was originally built in 1920. Sometime prior to 1995, the house was significantly expanded. The original building, garage and stonework mostly remain intact. The house is located in The Highlands area of Mound, off Bartlett Blvd. There are 85 feet of frontage along Highland Blvd, and the house is between 3056 Highland owned by Mr. F. Todd Warner and a Town of Mound Right of Way used for access to water lift stations as well as town docks. Since 1995, the house has had three owners, including sale transaction in 2008 and 2011. William & Alison Moore purchased 3070 Highland Blvd. in May 2011. As we all know, Minnesota winters can be grueling. Minneapolis' downtown Skyway system is the prime example of architectural methods used in this climate to avoid the elements. Relatively new to the region, the Moores wish to avoid the Minnesota winter elements in a feasible manner, especially on their own property. Consequently, they engaged the Infinite Group to design a breezeway /mudroom to connect the kitchen's pantry to the detached garage (herein referred to as the "Connector "). Project The detached, side - loaded garage is located 18 feet from the principle structure and 8.4 feet from the street - side property line. It is approximately 280 square feet in area. i t t� •— •— •— •— •— •— •- -- •- - -• --- - — The Connector is not particularly visible outside of the property due to the location of the project between the house and the garage, and the placement of an existing privacy fence. The Connector would start to the left of the double windows, and end well before the corner of the house. -452- Picture B. The Connector would ft between the two post lights, and the roof will fit below the peak windows. -453- Picture C. From the street, the connection would not even be visible. The Connector would begin to the right of the partially visible window - outside of the view of this picture. Picture D. View from the access road on the West. -454- Pirfiira P Arini viaw -455- The R -1 Zoning District - Single Family Residential - has certain setback requirements. The principal building front yard set back of 30 feet. Further, the code states that detached accessory buildings shall meet the same front yard setback requirements. However, the code makes specific exceptions for lakeshore lots and more specifically as it relates to side - loaded garages on such lots. For detached garages on lakeshore, a minimum eight foot setback is required if the garage door(s) open to the side lot line (vs. 20 feet for front loaded). The majority of lakeside lots on Cooks Bay, Priest Bay, Harrison Bay, and Langdon Lake are R -1 Zones. As it currently stands, the existing garage is a conforming accessory building. The principal structure is a conforming building. A new Connector attaching both structures would make the detached garage non- conforming to the front setback rules even though the property with and without the Connector would look exactly the same from the street. As such, based on the City rules, we have sought variance for the Connector. The City Planning Staff was supportive of the variance and recommended approval to the City's Planning Commission. The City Planning Commission voted 8 -1 in favor of approving the variance, and it was placed in the City Council's consent agenda for the following week. At the request of Mayor Mark Hanus and Councilman David Osmek, the variance approval was pulled from the consent agenda for discussion and ultimately remanded back to the Staff for denial by a vote of 3- 2. In all due respect to the Council members, I believe they arbitrarily voted against approval on grounds inconsistent with the Minnesota court actions, the State's new statutes and guidance from League of Minnesota Cities. I plan to layout why I think a variance is acceptable, and address some of the concerns specifically highlighted in the December 13a' meeting. Granting a Variance as per The League of Minnesota Cities Variance — Exception to literal application of zoning ordinance Standards for Granting a Variance The standards for granting variances by boards of adjustment for cities or townships are spelled out in Minnesota Statutes. "Many cities have ordinances that are drafted to provide a solid baseline... while leaving room for appropriate exemptions." Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the official control, but not adherent to the strict letter of the code. Boards must make decisions that are subjective yet with the obligation of being objective. In Paper v. Atkin County Planning Commission (MN Appeals C2- 00- 1333), the court noted that "case law distinguishes between zoning matters which are legislative in nature and those which are quasi-judicial (variances and special use permits)." Because of the far reaching nature of the Krummenacher decision, the League of Minnesota Cities provided guidance cities on how to react to variance requests and variance criteria. Subsequent to their guidance, the Minnesota State Legislation amended the statutes to clear up the ambiguous language that raised the bar for variance approval. Nevertheless, the League's guidance is still appropriate and applicable to our discussion. They suggested that during the post- Krummenacher variance -less period, cities build flexibility into the code to allow "variance -like" approvals to items such as setbacks when they are consistent with neighborhood attributes; provided that, such re- examination of the zoning code should -456- come if a city is in a position where it "routinely grants" such variances. The State Legislation made that guidance moot, but the appropriateness of such distinction between ordinances and variances is still applicable. Considering this was the first variance case considered by the staff under the post - Krummenacher Rules, it will be helpful to discuss the background and subsequent results of the case. Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, June 24, 2010 Opinion and Subsequent Legislative Action The case revolves around the use of the term "undue hardship" and its subsequent definition, meaning the property in question cannot be put to "reasonable use." The Court of Appeals relied on the decision of Rowell v. Board of Adjustment of Moorhead (1989). The court in that case interpreted "undue hardship" as the property would be used in any reasonable manner otherwise not permitted. In other words, hardship was defined as "any reasonable use." Although she specifically notes that Rowell standard has been used "over 20 years," MN Supreme Court Chief Justice Gildea in her opinion rejected that interpretation stating that the definition should be for "a reasonable use." That is starkly different than "any reasonable use." Gildea's new standard made a clear distinction between "practical difficulties" and "undue hardship" and would suggest that a variance should not granted unless there was no other reasonable use besides the request — a nearly insurmountable hurdle. However, Chief Justice Gildea was not negative on the variance process itself. She specifically noted in her opinion that if "undue hardship" was not defined as it was in the statute, the opinion would likely have been different. "A flexible variance standard allows municipalities to make modest adjustments to the detailed application of a regulatory scheme when zoning ordinances impose significant burdens on an individual, and relief can be fashioned without harm to neighbors, the community, or the overall purposes of the ordinance." The term and definition of "practical difficulties" is less rigorous. Gildea identifies several factors under "practical difficulties" standard should be considered including, - how substantial the variation is in relation to the requirement, - whether the variance will effect a substantial change in the character of the neighborhood, - whether it will be a substantial detriment to neighboring properties, - whether the difficulty could be alleviated by a feasible method other than a variance, - whether the landowner created the need for the variance, and finally, - whether allowing the variance will serve the interest of justice. She states in the opinion, "inevitably and necessarily there is a tension between zoning ordinances and property rights, as courts balance the right of citizens to the enjoyment if private property with the right of municipalities to restrict property use. In this balancing process, constitutional property rights must be respected and protected from unreasonable Zoning restrictions." [emphasis added] On May 5d', 2011, Governor Dayton signed into law an amendment of the Statutes that restore municipal variance authority in response to the Krummenacher case. The new law renamed the variance standard, eliminating the "undue hardship" language criticized by Chief Justice Gildea, and replaced it with the more lenient "practical difficulties." Consequently, the new rules reinstate the original Rowell interpretation for a variance of 1. reasonableness, 2. uniqueness and 3. essential character. According to The League of Minnesota Cities, cities in evaluating variance requests under the new law should adopt findings addressing the following questions: 1. Is the variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinances? 2. Is the variance consistent with the comprehensive plan? 3. Does the proposal put property to use in a reasonable manner? 4. Are the unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner? 5. Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the locality? -457- 3070 Highland Blvd. Variance Request in Light of the Application of the New "Practical Difficulty" Standards. The League of Minnesota Cities, a non - profit organization of municipalities of which Mound is a member and derives its variance application from, states that, "a variance may be granted if enforcement of a zoning ordinance provision as applied to a particular piece of property would cause the landowner "practical difficulties" based on the statutory three- factor test based on Minn. Stat. 462.357. 1. Reasonable? The first factor is that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. According to the League's FAQ reflecting the 2011 law change, this factor means that the landowner would like to use the property in a particular way, but cannot do so under the rules of the ordinance. It does not mean that the land cannot be put to any reasonable use whatsoever without the variance. The focus of the first factor is what does the applicant wish to do and is the request reasonable. They specifically note that functional and aesthetic concerns are appropriate considerations. In this case, the request is to build a Connector from the heated garage to the heated primary building. The average low temperature in the Twin Cities area is less than 12 degrees for each of the months December, January and February. We can easily go days or even weeks where the ongoing temperature remains below zero. The Twin Cities has the coldest average temperature of any major metropolitan area in the nation. The current homeowners are new to the region, and it is hardly an unreasonable request to protect themselves from the climate. 2a. Essential Character of the Locality A second factor is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Under this factor, the League considers whether the resulting structure will be out of scale, out of place or otherwise inconsistent with the surrounding area. They note specifically the following example, "when thinking about the variance for an encroachment into a setback, the focus is how the particular building will look closer to a lot line." [emphasis added] In this case, the variance will have de minimis change to optics from the lot line. Whether the property is conforming or a variance is mostly a case of semantics. The property with and without a variance will look no different from the street, no different from the West and South, and only modest change from the East. Additionally, the existing structure is completely in -line with the other garages in the neighborhood, which are primarily detached, front - loaded garages. In this case, the project for which the variance is requested is neither out of scale, out of place, nor disruptive of the area around it. 2b. Effect on Neighbors Chief Justice Gildea specifically noted in her Krummenacher opinion that a variance relief should, "be fashioned without harm to neighbors." F. Todd Warner, owner of 3056 Highland Blvd, mailed a letter to the town (and included by the Staff) in support of the variance. Additionally, the homeowners have included in this package a letter from Michael Hogan, owner of 3073 Highland Blvd, supporting the variance. 3a. Circumstances Not Caused by the Landowner. It is not in any dispute that these are not circumstances created by the Landowner. The property has changed hands at least twice since the properties were built. IK• 3b. Uniqueness The third and final factor is uniqueness which according to the League generally relates to the physical characteristics of the particular property (i.e., the land and buildings, not the personal characteristics or preferences of die landowner). When considering the variance for a setback requirement, physical uniqueness includes topography. size or shape of lot, size or shape of existing buildings, as well as placement of existing structures on lot. Although variances are for specific properties rather than a precedent setting feature. the Board should quantify the question of how and why is the property different from others. The City of Mound has a number of residential zoning districts with different setback restrictions. 3070 Highland Blvd is located in the R -I District. Within the R -1 District, the code makes a separate distinction regarding lakefront lots. Among those properties, there are 64 detached garages that rely on the detached accessory structure setback rules, and six (6) of those properties also have an attached garage on -site (see Exhibit A). Of those structures, the setback rules differentiate between side - loaded versus front - loaded garages. There are a total of 14 side - loaded, detached garages on R -I Lakeshore lots (see Exhibit B). Not all detached garages hope to be attached someday. In fact, many detached garages serve a specific purpose accomplished by the fact that they separate structures. For instance, there are a number of detached garages in both the R -I and the R -I A zoning district (whose setback requirements are different from R -l) which could be connected to the primary residence without a variance, but have not done so. From my examination of all the detached garages in the zoning district, the seemingly primary reason for a detached structure is large distances between the primary residence and the street (and thus the garage), large elevation changes between the house and the street, or both. Picture - 2888 Highland Blvd where the detached garage has a significant elevation change and distance from the primary structure -459- Of the 19 side - loaded garages, seven (7) have large distances between the house and the garage. Another four (4) have significant elevation changes between the garage and the principal property. Of the eight (8) remaining, at least five (5) would be a significant detriment to neighboring properties, and only one (1) of those eight properties is next to a public right of way - 3070 Highland Blvd. Total Lots —390 With Detached 60 Side - Loaded 19 Less Distance =:> 12 Less Elevation 8 Less Proximity => 3 Next to ROW = 1 See Exhibit C for all 19 properties. The variance request for 3070 Highland is unique in that it is one of the few detached garage properties with a small distance between principal structure and the detached garage and/or level property. It is the only property in such a situation that is next to a public right of way, and thus no effect on an immediate neighbor. The variance is also unique in that the project would have no visible features from the street. Finally, the project is unique in that the project's heating source is located in the garage. The garage's radiant heat would be extended from the garage's existing system into the new Connector. As per the League of Minnesota Cities, physical uniqueness is created when one property is "not like any other," when it comes to topography, shape of lot, shape of existing building and placement of those buildings on the lot. Practical Difficulties Based on the reasonableness of the request, the uniqueness and the fact that it doesn't alter the essential character, the variance fits the definition of practical difficulties. Additionally, the variance does not alter the spirit of the code or the town's general plan. The purposes of zoning ordinances is to formally codify land use policies for a city and to distinguish between different types of uses which may be incompatible. When a zoning ordinance is formulated, i usually reflects the fact that people find certain types of activities conflicting and/or it preserves certain aesthetic ideals or preserve public safety. Sec. 129 -1 (Intent and purpose) of the City of Mound Code states, This chapter [zoning] is adopted for the purpose of: (1) Protecting the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience and general welfare. (2) Promoting orderly development of the residential... areas. (3) Conserving the natural and scenic beauty and attractiveness of the city. (4) Conserving and developing natural resources. (5) Providing for the compatibility of different land uses and the most appropriate use of land throughout the city. -460- Concerns from the Previous Meeting Variance versus Change the Code "There are a lot of detached garages. If this is the direction we want to go, I would suggest we change the code." Mayor Hanus, Mound City Council Meeting, December 13, 2011. Variances are exceptions to literal application of zoning ordinance. They allow a structure to be altered in a manner not allowed under ordinance. On the other hand, law is established in statute or ordinance. The League of Minnesota Cities discussed the differences in what they refer to as the Pyramid of Discretion. Source: League of Minnesota Cities, Land Use Law & Logistics; LMC Conf. 611612011 The Pyramid distinguishes between creating law, applying law and administrating law and the quantity of people it affects. Boards should distinguish between zoning matters that are legislative and those which are quasi-judicial (variances and special use permits). In 2011 Legislative Issues, the League recommends that a city reexamine the existing code when the city repeatedly grants a variance. They note, "if a city routinely grants variances, this may be an indicator that it may want to reexamine its zoning code," and consider amending ordinance to change a rule. Connecting a detached garage is not a common variance request. In the 10 -year collective memory of the Commission Staff, there has not been a single variance request of this sort. Consequently, it would be a mistake to focus on changing the ordinance versus granting the variance request. To the extent that the granting this request would suddenly drive a demand for connecting detached structures (albeit an unreasonable assumption), maintaining a variance process will allow the staff to review each situation on its own merits. However, if the council were to change the ordinance, it would strip the staff and Planning Commission from reviewing and scrutinizing prospective applications. -461- Granting the Variance is Too Precedent Setting Unlike a court ruling, the granting of a variance is not a precedent setting event. A variance is a city ruling that only applies to a specific property. Even though a variance is not a precedent, granting of the variance with certain characteristics or conditions could qualify and specify the variance as to not allow an exaggerated interpretation by another applicant. Conditions limiting square footage, limiting the distance of the variance- required project, or specifying no neighboring private property would surely squash even a lenient interpretation of the variance. Each subsequent variance request will need to meet its own standards of 1. Reasonableness, 2. Uniqueness, and 3. Character. To the extent that variance request meets those standards, it deserves a variance regardless of any variance that came before it. As noted above, if such requests become common practice, the Council, at that time, should consider examining the actual code. Clearly, the Council and the Staff have the right to impose conditions when granting variances. HR52 notes that, "a condition imposed must be directly related to and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance." One member noted in the last meeting that a potential relief of our variance would be to, "lop off one car stall' and thus gain 22 feet eliminating the need for a variance. Such an idea is hardly a proportional response to the request to add a 270 square foot Connector. -462- -463- Also No altch, side, Big Big Loa Bay Road House Detached FL Attached non-conform Distance Elevatlon Dist i Bev ROW Cook's Bay Highland BNd 3040 1 1 1 Cooks Bay Highland Blvd 3036 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Highland Blvd 3032 1 1 1 Code's Bay Highland Blvd 3026 1 1 1 Code's Bay Highland Blvd 3020 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Highland Blvd 3016 1 1 1 Code's Bay Highland Blvd 2986 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Highland Blvd 2976 1 1 Code's Bay Highland Blvd 2896 1 1 Code's Bay Highland Blvd 2888 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Highland Blvd 2880 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Highland Blvd 2872 1 1 Cook's Bay Bartlett Blvd 5823 1 1 Cook's Bay Bartlett Blvd 5601 1 1 1 Code's Bay Bartlett Blvd 5561 1 1 1 Code's Bay Barnett Blvd 5553 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Bartlett Blvd 5501 1 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Emerald Dr. 5145 1 1 Code's Bay Emerald Dr. 5139 1 1 1 Code's Bay WishlreBlvd 2625 1 1 Codes Bay Charles La 3201 1 1 Cook's Bay Charles La 3207 1 1 1 Cock's Bay Gladstone Lane 3231 1 1 1 Cooks Bay Gladstone Lane 3237 1 1 1 Cook's Bay Gladstone Lane 3247 1 1 1 Code's Bay Warner La 3325 1 1 Cook's Bay Warner La 3359 1 1 Code's Bay Warner La 3367 1 1 Cooks Bay Tuxedo Blvd 5012 1 1 Dutch Lake Aspen Rd 6064 1 1 Dutch Lake Aspen Rd 6090 1 1 Dutch Lake Aspen Rd 6216 1 1 Emerald /Seton Lake Driftwood La 2352 1 1 Emerald /Seton Lake Driftwood La 2324 1 1 Emerald /Sdon Lake Driftwood La 2308 1 1 Emerald /Seton Lake Avon Or 2516 1 1 Emerald /Seton Lake Avon Or 2424 1 1 Hanisons Bay Noble La 2138 1 1 Hardsons Bay Overland Lo 2132 1 Hanlsons Bay Ashland La 2137 1 1 Hanisons Bay Cardinal La 2145 1 1 Harrisons/Jonnings Bay Three Points Blvd 5316 1 1 1 HanisonsMennings Bay Shorewood La 1871 1 1 1 Hanisons/Jenrdngs Bay Lakeside La 1909 1 1 Harnsons/Jenrdngs Bay Lakeside La 1920 1 1 Hardsons/Jennings Bay Lakeside La 1969 1 1 HaMsons/Jennings Bay Shorewood La 2018 1 1 i Hanisons/Jannings Bay Shorewood La 2006 1 1 1 HanisonsiJennings Bay Shorewood La 1960 1 1 1 Harrisms/Jennings Bay Shorewood La 1920 1 1 1 Lake Langdon Beachwood Rd 5910 1 1 1 Lake Langdon Beachwood Rd 6016 1 1 1 Lake Langdon Westedge Av 2606 1 1 1 Lake Langdon Westedge Av 2600 1 1 1 Lake Langdon Westedge Av 6200 1 1 Priest Bay Sinclair Rd 6189 1 1 1 Priest Bay Sinclair Rd 6195 1 1 1 Priest Bay Sinclair Rd 6199 1 1 1 Priest Bay Ridgewood Rd 5991 1 1 1 Priest Bay Ridgewood Rd 6001 1 1 1 Priest Bay Ridgewood Rd 6009 1 1 1 Priest Bay Ridgewood Rd 6049 1 1 Priest Bay Halstead La 6641 1 1 -463- O, w N r r M N O ca J d W X rn O '75 az O Y m O m W w m m U c m Y U1 0 N r L U m Y N WO�r Mc- 0�I-Nc0W000WW0 0 W W a0ulaMMMM 0N—�00 � QO o0 c0 to t1y tL') A N N •- M 0 0 0 0 O CO CO N N 0 M ul UA Ul M M N 0 N v- - 0 0 N N N O 3 O 2 > O a m m m J J J >> >> O a a J J m m m >>>> p N O J 0 0 0 N N -a -O m m m m'a c c 'a 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 r- C� v r- m o o' a 3 3 3: >,. as m OOOOLu,w— a�a�a�a� YY o IT rnrn� m m m E� —°�—° >�ss 0 M M aNi m IX =mmmMLU(D00- cncncnmm�� m m m m mmmm rnrnrnrn c c c c c c c c c c c c m c c c c 0 0 0 0 m m m m m m m m m ,� N N N rn rn rn rn m CO CO CO CO m m CO CO c c c c c c c c c w M 0 to w 0 N M w 0 0 0 0 0 J J J J aC .Y le le aC le le Y aL Mn N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0... 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m 000000000_ == = =_464,J EXHBITS Shorewood La -465- 3231 3237 Gladstone 5139 Emerald -467- 5501 Bartlett Blvd 5910 Beachwood Rd 6018 Beachwood Rd D• lgf,Al 4442 5401 Rartlntt Rtvrl -470- 4" ° Mound City Council Town of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 To whom it may concern: I am writing in support of the home improvement project by William Moore of 3070 Highland Blvd. It is my understanding that Mr. Moore is interested in connecting his primary structure to that of his detached garage; however, such a structure would require a variance from the Town of Mound's City Planning Office. My residence, 3073 Highland Blvd., is immediately across the street from Mr. Moore's driveway. I can attest that such a variance, if granted, would have no meaningful effect on my property, nor would it obstruct or demean my view. In fact, it is unlikely that I will even see the connecting structure from my own property. It is my opinion as a resident of this neighborhood that such a variance would in no way alter the essential character of this community. Sincerely, Michael Hogan 3073 Highland Blv -472- L r0 G2 OF CONNECTING & INNOVATING MINNESOTA SINCE 1913 CITIES 2011 Variance Legislation The changes, which are now in effect, may require some cities to change ordinances or statutory cross - references. After a long and contentious session working to restore city variance authority, the final version of HF 52 supported by the League and allies was passed unanimously by the Legislature. On May 5, Gov. Dayton signed 2011 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 19, amending Minnesota Statutes, section 462.357, subdivision 6 to restore municipal variance authority in response to Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. June 24, 2010). The law also provides consistent statutory language between Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462 and the county variance authority of Minnesota Statutes, section 394.27, subdivision 7. In Krummenacher, the Minnesota Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the statutory definition of "undue hardship" and held that the "reasonable use" prong of the "undue hardship" test is not whether the proposed use is reasonable, but rather whether there is a reasonable use in the absence of the variance. The new law changes that factor back to the "reasonable manner" understanding that had been used by some lower courts prior to the Krummenacher ruling. The new law was effective on May 6, the day following the governor's approval. Presumably it applies to pending applications, as the general rule is that cities are to apply the law at the time of the decision, rather than at the time of application. Learn More Read more about variances in: Land Use Variances: Frequently Asked Questions The new law renames the municipal variance standard from "undue hardship" to "practical difficulties," but otherwise retains the familiar three- factor test of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, and (3) essential character. Also included is a sentence new to city variance authority that was already in the county statutes: "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan." In addition, the new law clarifies that conditions may be imposed on granting of variances if those conditions are directly related to and bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. Consult your attorney for advice concerning specific situations. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 14S UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST PHONE: (651) 281 -1200 FAX (651) 281 -1298 INSURANCE TRUST - 473 -,UL, MN 55103 -2044 TOLL FREE: (800) 925-1122 WEB:WWW.LMC.ORG In evaluating variance requests under the new law, cities should adopt findings addressing the following questions: • Is the variance in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinance? • Is the variance consistent with the comprehensive plan? Does the proposal put property to use in a reasonable manner? Are there unique circumstances to the property not created by the landowner? Will the variance, if granted, alter the essential character of the locality? Some cities may have ordinance provisions that codified the old statutory language, or that have their own set of standards. For those cities, the question may be whether you have to first amend your zoning code before processing variances under the new standard. A credible argument can be made that that the statutory language pre -empts inconsistent local ordinance provisions. Under a pre - emption theory, cities could apply the new law immediately without necessarily amending their ordinance first. In any regard, it would be best practice for cities to revisit their ordinance provisions and consider adopting language that mirrors the new statute. Attached are a collection of sample documents reflecting the 2011 variance legislation. The attached samples include a draft ordinance, application form, and findings of fact template. While the attached materials may contain provisions that could serve as models in drafting your own documents, your city attorney would need to review prior to council action to tailor to your city's needs. Your city may have different ordinance requirements that need to be accommodated. If you have questions about how your city should approach variances under this new statute, you should discuss it with your city attorney or contact Jed Burkett, LMC land use attorney, at jburkett *lmc.org or (651) 281 -1247, or Tom Grundhoefer, LMC general counsel, at tgrundho@lme.org or (651) 281 -1266. Jed Burkett 06/11 -474- 2 6��_ o � LEAGUE of CONNECTING & INNOVATING INNESOTA SINCE 1913 CITIES VARIANCES Frequently Asked Questions (Reflects 2011 law change) What is a variance? A variance is a way that a city may allow an exception to part of a zoning ordinance. It is a permitted departure from strict enforcement of the ordinance as applied to a particular piece of property. A variance is generally for a dimensional standard (such as setbacks or height limits). A variance allows the landowner to break a dimensional zoning rule that would otherwise apply. Who grants a variance? Minnesota law provides that requests for variances are heard by a body called the board of adjustment and appeals; in many smaller communities, the planning commission or even the city council may serve that function. A variance decision is generally appealable to the city council. For more information, see Minn. Stat. § 462.357. When can a variance be granted? A variance may be granted if enforcement of a zoning ordinance provision as applied to a particular piece of property would cause the landowner "practical difficulties." For the variance to be granted, the applicant must satisfy the statutory three - factor test for practical difficulties. If the applicant does not meet all three factors of the statutory test, then a variance should not be granted. Also, variances are only permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance, and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. For more information, see Minn. Stat. � 462.357. What kind of authority is the city exercising? A city exercises so- called "quasi-judicial" authority when considering a variance application. This means that the city's role is limited to applying the legal standard of practical difficulties to the facts presented by the application. The city acts like a judge in evaluating the facts against the legal standard. If the applicant meets the standard, then the variance may be granted. In contrast, when the city writes the rules in zoning ordinance, the city is exercising "legislative" authority and has much broader discretion. What is practical difficulties? Practical difficulties is a legal standard set forth in law that cities must apply the when considering applications for variances. It is a three - factor test and applies to all requests for variances. To constitute practical difficulties, all three factors of the test must be satisfied. For more information, see Minn. Stat. § 462.357. This material is provided as general information and is not a substitute for legal advice. Consult your attorney for advice concerning specific situations. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 145 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST PHONE: (651) 281-1200 FAx: (651) 281-1298 INSURANCE TRUST _475_. MN 55103 -2044 TOLL FREE: (800) 925 -1122 WEB: WWW.LMC.ORG What are the practical difficulties factors? The first factor is that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. This factor means that the landowner would like to use the property in a particular reasonable way but cannot do so under the rules of the ordinance. It does not mean that the land cannot be put to any reasonable use whatsoever without the variance. For example, if the variance application is for a building too close to a lot line, or does not meet the required setback, the focus of the first factor is whether the request to place a building there is reasonable. The second factor is that the landowner's problem is due to circumstances unique to the property not caused by the landowner. The uniqueness generally relates to the physical characteristics of the particular piece of property, that is, to the land, and not personal characteristics or preferences of the landowner. When considering the variance for a building to encroach or intrude into a setback, the focus of this factor is whether there is anything physically unique about the particular piece of property, such as sloping topography or other natural features like wetlands or trees. The third factor is that the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Under this factor consider whether the resulting structure will be out of scale, out of place, or otherwise inconsistent with the surrounding area. For example, when thinking about the variance for an encroachment into a setback, the focus is how the particular building will look closer to a lot line and if that fits in with the character of the area. Are there are other factors a city should consider? Yes. State statute provides variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance, and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. So, in addition to the three - factor practical difficulties test, a city evaluating a variance application should make findings as to (1) whether or not the variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the ordinance, and (2) whether or not the variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. What about economic considerations? Sometimes landowners insist that they deserve a variance because they have already incurred substantial costs or argue they will not receive expected revenue without the variance. State statute specifically notes that economic considerations alone cannot create practical difficulties. Rather, practical difficulties exists only when the three statutory factors are met. What about undue hardship? "Undue hardship" was the name of the three - factor test prior to a May 2011 change of law. Effective May 6, 2011 Minnesota Laws, Chapter 19, amended Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6 to restore municipal variance authority in response to Krummenacher v. City of Minnetonka, 783 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. June 24, 2010). In Krummenacher, the Minnesota Supreme Court interpreted the statutory definition of "undue hardship" and held that the "reasonable use" prong of the "undue hardship" test was not whether the proposed use is reasonable, but rather whether there is a reasonable use in the absence of the variance. -476- What did the 2011 law change? The 2011 law changed the first factor back to the "reasonable manner" understanding that had been used by some lower courts prior to the Krummenacher ruling. The 2011 law renamed the municipal variance standard from "undue hardship" to "practical difficulties," but otherwise retained the familiar three - factor test of (1) reasonableness, (2) uniqueness, and (3) essential character. The 2011 law also provides that: "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan." Can a city grant a use variance? Sometimes a landowner will seek a variance to allow a particular use of their property that would otherwise not be permissible under the zoning ordinance. Such variances are often termed "use variances" as opposed to "area variances" from dimensional standards. Use variances are not generally allowed in Minnesota —state law prohibits a city from permitting by variance any use that is not permitted under the ordinance for the zoning district where the property is located. For more information, see Minn. Stat. § 462.357. Is a public hearing required? Minnesota statute does not clearly require a public hearing before a variance is granted or denied, but many practitioners and attorneys agree that the best practice is to hold public hearings on all variance requests. A public hearing allows the city to establish a record and elicit facts to help determine if the application meets the practical difficulties factors. What is the role of neighborhood opinion? Neighborhood opinion alone is not a valid basis for granting or denying a variance request. While city officials may feel their decision should reflect the overall will of the residents, the task in considering a variance request is limited to evaluating how the variance application meets the statutory practical difficulties factors. Residents can often provide important facts that may help the city in addressing these factors, but unsubstantiated opinions and reactions to a request do not form a legitimate basis for a variance decision. If neighborhood opinion is a significant basis for the variance decision, the decision could be overturned by a court. What is the role of past practice? While past practice may be instructive, it cannot replace the need for analysis of all three of the practical difficulties factors for each and every variance request. In evaluating a variance request, cities are not generally bound by decisions made for prior variance requests. If a city finds that it is issuing many variances to a particular zoning standard, the city should consider the possibility of amending the ordinance to change the standard. When should a variance decision be made? A written request for a variance is subject to Minnesota's 60 -day rule and must be approved or denied within 60 days of the time it is submitted to the city. A city may extend the time period for an additional 60 days, but only if it does so in writing before expiration of the initial 60 -day period. Under the 60 -day rule, failure to approve or deny a request within the statutory time period is deemed an approval. For more information, see Minn. Stat. & 15.99. -477-1 How should a city document a variance decision? Whatever the decision, a city should create a record that will support it. In the case of a variance denial, the 60 -day rule requires that the reasons for the denial be put in writing. Even when the variance is approved, the city should consider a written statement explaining the decision. The written statement should explain the variance decision, address each of the three practical difficulties factors and list the relevant facts and conclusions as to each factor. Can meeting minutes adequately document a variance decision? If a variance is denied, the 60 -day rule requires a written statement of the reasons for denial be provided to the applicant within the statutory time period. While meeting minutes may document the reasons for denial, usually a separate written statement will need to be provided to the applicant in order to meet the statutory deadline. A separate written statement is advisable even for a variance approval, although meeting minutes could serve as adequate documentation, provided they include detail about the decision factors and not just a record indicating an approval motion passed. Can a city attach conditions to a variance? By law, a city may impose a condition when it grants a variance so long as the condition is directly related and bears a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. For instance, if a variance is granted to exceed an otherwise applicable height limit, any conditions attached should presumably relate to mitigating the affect of excess height. For more information, see Minn. Stat. & 462.357. What happens to the variance once granted? A variance once issued is a property right that "runs with the land" so it attaches to and benefits the land and is not limited to a particular landowner. A variance is typically filed with the county recorder. Even if the property is sold to another person, the variance applies. Jed Burkett 2011/06 • This information sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 952 - 472 -0607. General Zoning Information Sheet R -1 Zoning District — Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS — Lot Area, Lot Width, and Setback Reguirements MinimumLot Area .................. ............................... .........................10,000 Square Feet MinimumLot Width .......................................................... ............................... 60 Feet Front Yard Setback ........................................................ ............................... 30 Feet SideYard Setback ........................................................... .............................10 Feet Rear Yard Setback ........................................................... .............................15 Feet MinimumLot Depth ........................................................... .............................80 Feet Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback ............................. .............................50 Feet Minimum Floor Area Requirement ............................ ............................840 Square Feet *Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 60 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul -de -sac shall be 60 feet at the front building setback line. Applicable side or rear yard setbacks apply to lot lines abutting fire lanes, alleys or unimproved street right -of -ways. Building Height. The vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. No building hereafter erected shall exceed two and one half (2 -1/2) stories or thirty -five (35) feet in height. LOTS OF RECORD, Special Provisions CnrnPr Lots Lot width Minimum side yard setback 40 - 50 feet 10 feet 50 — 80 feet 20 feet 81 feet or more 30 feet Side Yard Reauirements — The reauired side vard setback shall be a minimum of 10 feet. Lot width Minimum setback on 1 side yard 40 — 79 feet 6 feet 80 —100 feet 8 feet 101 feet or more 10 feet Front Yard — Except as regulated in Section 350.440, Subd. 6 of the City Code, the front yard setback shall be based on the lot depth as follows: Lot depth Minimum front yard setback 60 feet or less 20 feet 61 — 80 feet 24 feet 81 feet or more 30 feet 6 -479 HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. On existing lots of record`, impervious coverage may be permitted by a maximum of 40 percent providing that techniques are utilized as identified in Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.6.1. Impervious cover is any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water or surface moisture, including all buildings, driveways and parking areas whether paved or not, tennis courts, sidewalks, patios and swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum opening between boards) shall not be counted in impervious cover calculations. DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDINGS (GARAGES /SHEDS) — Lot Coveraae and Setback Reauirements An accessory building shall be considered to be an integral part of the principal structure unless it is five (5) feet or more from the principal structure or use and providing that the structure exceeds 120 square feet. Area and Size Requirements (see hardcover requirements on page 1) A. Accessory buildings shall not exceed a total gross floor area of 3,000 square feet or 15% of the total lot area whichever is less. B. Each individual accessory building shall not exceed 1,200 square feet of gross floor area. C. The total number of accessory buildings for lots measuring 10,000 square feet or less shall be two (2). On lots exceeding 10,000 square feet, accessory buildings shall be limited to a total of three (3). 2. Front Yard Setback. All accessory buildings shall meet thte same front yard setback requirements as the principal building, except for lakeshore and through lots. For detached garages on a lakeshore or through lots, a minimum twenty (20) foot front yard setback is required if the garage door(s) open to the street; an eight (8) foot front yard setback is required if the garage door(s) open to the side lot line. 3. Side Yard Setback. A detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of the side lot line in the rear yard with a minimum of a six (6) foot setback in side yard location. On through and Lakeshore lots, a detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of the side lot line in the front yard. Whenever a garage is designed with the doors facing a side lot line, the minimum distance between the doors and the side lot line shall be twenty (20) feet. 4. Rear Setback. A detached accessory building may be located within four (4) feet of the rear lot line. 5. Lakeshore Setback. Detached accessory buildings must maintain a 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water. DECKS See separate deck handout for more information. Front and Sides .......................... ...........................Same as Accessory Building Setbacks Rear................................................................................. .............................10 feet ELEVATION Ordinary High Water Flood Elevation Lowest Floor Elevation REQUIREMENTS LAKE MINNETONKA 929.4 MCWD 931.5 933 CITY 931 DUTCH LAKE 939.2 940 942 LAKE LANGDON 932.1 935 937 nnn6 -480- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: December 7, 2011 SUBJECT: Variance — connection /addition between detached garage and house OWNER: Bill and Allison Moore PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 11 -13 LOCATION: 3070 Highland Boulevard ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential REQUEST At its December 6, 2011 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a variance application from Bill and Allison Moore to construct a conforming addition to connect the existing detached accessory garage to the existing house at 3070 Highland Boulevard. VARIANCE REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) contains the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound. Mound Ordinance No. 03 -2011 became effective on October 23, 2011 and included new regulations related to variances following modifications to Minnesota State Statutes that were adopted by the legislature earlier this year in response to the 2010 MN Supreme Court decision, sometimes referred to as the "Krummenacher case ", which made the granting variances very difficult and stated that a City could only grant a variance when an applicant had demonstrated that the property could not be put to any reasonable use without it. Generally speaking, the 2011 ordinance amendments related to variances are summarized as follows: 1) Inclusion of new definitions for "Practical Difficulties" and "Unique 2) Removal of the definition for "Undue Hardship "; and 3) Revision of the City's current regulations regarding variance approval for consistency with the 2011 legislation which included removal and /or modification of the variance standards previously contained in Mound's code. 1 -481- A copy of Ordinance No. 03 -11 is on file with the City and will be provided upon request. TIMELINE FOR AGENCY ACTION State Statute requires approval and /or denial of land use applications within 60 days per MSS 15.99 unless the City executes an extension. Additionally, the provisions of MSS 15.99 also allow an applicant to extend the decision timeline. The variance application was submitted and deemed to be complete on or around November 23, 2011. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments and agencies for review and comment. DISCUSSION • The subject property fronts Highland Boulevard on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side. The proposal involves construction of a conforming addition to connect the existing, detached, side - loaded garage accessory structure located in the NW corner of the subject site to the existing house. Staffs review is that both structures are conforming to setbacks. As the proposed project includes connecting the existing detached garage to the existing house, consistency with the principal structure setbacks for a "tot of Record" in the R -1 District is required. Please see below. Front 30 FT Side 10 FT Rear 15 FT from rear lot line or 50 FT from 929.4 ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of lake Minnetonka or 10 FT from top of bluff, whichever is most restrictive. A front setback of 8 feet and side setback of 4 feet is allowed for side loaded garages on lakeside and through lots As stated above, the side setbacks required for the project are 10 FT. The proposed addition would be located 14' 5" from the west side lot line. The proposed setback to the east line is between 50 -60 feet. The existing front setback (detached garage) and rear setback (house), as a result of the project, are not changed by the proposed addition. However, the setbacks for a principal structure become applicable which includes a front setback of 30-FT. The "new" setback for the attached structure is 8.4 FT which is the current front setback for the existing detached garage. • The abutting property on the west side of the subject property is a 20 -foot parkway (paved) which provides access to the City's lift station and docks. 1) -482- • A variance was previously issued for the property in 1995 to recognize a number of existing nonconforming setbacks and construction of a conforming deck. It is mentioned in the resolution that a 30 -foot setback was required on the west side due to a platted right of way. Members are advised that the City Code was changed a number of years ago and now allows that unimproved street frontages, in residential districts, having a width exceeding 15 feet, to be considered side yards or rear yards, as appropriate, with a minimum required setback of 10 -feet. This provision is similar to the setbacks allowed for fire lanes and alleys. The zoning regulations define an improved public street to mean a public right of way or private right of way approved pursuant to the requirements of the City, containing a bituminous or concrete surfaced roadway. Staff applied the 10 -foot standard, as allowed for unimproved street frontages, due to the limited function and use of the ROW which is primarily for utility maintenance and for dock/lake access. • Hardcover on the subject site, based on information on the submitted survey, is below the allowed 40 percent maximum and it shown on the submitted survey. It appears hardcover, with the project, may only slightly be affected, as much of the involved project area is currently impervious. SITE INSPECTION Council members are encouraged to visit the site prior to the meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION Discussion at the meeting included an overview of the project. Staff explained that there are alternate setbacks for detached, side loaded garages and principal structures and that the proposed addition is conforming. However, the setbacks change when the structures are connected and the principal structure setbacks apply. Staff informed the Planning Commission that it applied the 10 -foot setback, as allowed for unimproved street frontages, as opposed to a standard 30 -ft front setback, as the ROW functions as an access road. Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted eight in favor and one opposed (Retterath) to recommend Council approval of the requested variance application as recommended by Staff. A draft resolution based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included for Council action. -483- RESOLUTION # 11 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3070 HIGHLAND BOULEVARD P & Z CASE 11 -13 WHEREAS, the applicants, William and Allision Moore, have submitted a variance request to construct an addition at 3070 Highland Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the subject property fronts Highland Boulevard on the north side and Lake Minnetonka on the south side. The proposal involves construction of a conforming addition to connect the existing, detached, side - loaded accessory structure, located in the northwest comer of the subject site, to the existing house; WHEREAS, per code, there are separate setback requirements for principal and accessory structures; and WHEREAS, the proposed addition to be constructed is conforming to setbacks however at the time the existing detached, side loaded garage and house are connected, a 30- foot front setback for the "new" structure now applies therefore variance approval is required which is described below: Reauired Setback Existina / Requested Setback 30 FT 8.4 FT and WHEREAS, details regarding the application are contained in Executive Summary No. 11 -13 and the supporting materials that were submitted by the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) contains the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound. WHEREAS, the variance application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its December 6, 2011 meeting who voted eight in favor and one opposed to recommend Council approval as recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance application to connect the existing detached accessory structure to the house as requested with the following conditions: Im 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. 3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighbor's property. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 8. No building permits will be issued until, any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 10. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The minimum required elevation for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. 11. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50-FT lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain area(s). As part of its approval of the variance, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact based on the record: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The proposed connection /addition is conforming to setbacks. 3. The abutting property on the west side is a platted, 20 -foot parkway which serves as an access road. 4. The existing location of the garage and house are not changing with the exception of the proposed addition to connect the structures. Rather, the applicable setbacks change because the code has alternate setbacks for side loaded, detached accessory structures which does not extend to principal structures with attached side - loaded garages. The expansion permit is hereby approved for the following legally described property: - To Be Inserted - The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 13"' day of December, 2011 Attest: City Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director and Catherine Pausche, Finance Director Date: February 9, 2012 Re: Developer request for discussion regarding proposed Chapter 429 financing and infrastructure improvements in Woodlyn Ridge subdivision, 6301 Lynwood Boulevard Overview. At its November 8, 2011 meeting, the City Council heard a presentation and preliminarily discussed a request submitted from Tim Hartman, Developer for Woodlyn Ridge, and Jeff Schoenwetter of JMS Homes for the Council to consider doing the Woodlyn Ridge subdivision improvements as a Chapter 429 improvement project to be financed using special assessments. With Chapter 429 financing, the City would assume the obligation of constructing all of the Improvements which currently are the obligation of the Developer. The Council referred the item to Staff for additional research to be brought back to a future Council meeting including, but not limited to, financial scenarios and bonding, assessable costs and information related to previous 429 projects. Woodlyn Ridge Project Background. • On May 25, 2010, the Council gave final plat approval for the plat of Woodlyn Ridge, and approved the Development Agreement between Timothy D. Hartman (the "Developer") and the City. • The Development Agreement contained provisions regulating the development of the lands covered by the plat. According to the terms of the Development Agreement, the Developer is to construct, at his sole expense, the Public Improvements and the Developer Items as described in the Agreement. The Public Improvements and the Developer Items are referred to as the "Improvements ". • The Agreement, as amended on September 14, 2010 (the "First Amendment") also provided that before the start of any construction the Developer was to post a letter of credit or cash as security that the City could use to construct the Improvements, and pay for the site clean -up in the event of Developer Default. Subsequent amendments to the Agreement were approved by the City Council on May 24, 2011 (the "Second Amendment") and October 11, 2011 (the 'Third Amendment") respectively. • Mr. Hartman is now proposing to affiliate with JMS Companies and create anew entity which is to become the "new" Developer of the subdivision. -488- Financial Analysis and Bond. Please refer to the attached spreadsheet and supplemental that was prepared by Finance Director Catherine Pausche. Members are advised that Ms. Pausche will review and discuss this information with the Council at the Feb. 14th meeting. Other Information. • Previous 429 Projects in Mound. Langdon Bay (Westedge Road Improvements) - Letter of Credit (LC) submitted for $217K which was 125% of the engineer's estimate ($157K) for the proportionate share (75%) of the Westedge Road improvements assessed against all of the lots in Langdon Bay and 12S% of the engineer's estimate ($20K) of the proportionate share (10%) of the costs to be assessed against other properties benefitted by the Westedge Road Improvements. - Per consent and waiver agreement, the property was not subject to any liens, interest, or encumbrances except the lien running in favor of Builders Development and Finance. MetroPlains (Public Improvements — sanitary/water /sidewalks and trails /park) - Assessable costs did not include city overhead, administrative or engineering costs as the developer was separately obligated for such costs in accordance with the provisions of Section 19A of the Subdivision Agreement. Section 19C of the Subdivision Agreement required submittal of an escrow deposit in the amount of $15K and required a minimum balance of $5000K. - Subdivision agreement required the submittal of security (cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit from a bank) in the amount of $100K which was 125% of the estimate costs of the relevant Improvements to guarantee compliance with the terms of the Agreement. • The preliminary estimate for preparation of the proposed 429 project plans from Bolton & Menk, Inc. is $27K. • Finance Director Catherine Pausche and Comm. Development Director Sarah Smith spoke with Savage City Administrator Barry Stock related to their experience using 429 financing which included a project with 1MS (Tracewater.) • Preliminary discussion with 1MS /Hartman is that Staffs recommended use of a Letter of Credit as opposed to a developer- backed bond, as financial security to guarantee the special assessments, is acceptable. • Approved Development Agreement for Woodlyn Ridge requires escrow deposit in the amount of $5000.00 to pay for costs of services or materials in connection with the review of the plat and the carrying out of inspection activities, clean -up activities, and other activities required under the Agreement. Possible Next Steps. In the event the Council expresses an interest in the Chapter 429 approach for financing of the infrastructure for Woodlyn Ridge, it will be necessary to consider, at a future date, amendments to the Development Agreement and related approvals and the proposed form of a final petition and waiver to be submitted by the Developer. Staff also recommends the development of a policy regarding the City's use of Chapter 429 for developer driven projects. IMOlO CALCULATION OF POTENTIAL INCREASE IN CITY PROPERTY TAXES Projected Value of Lot Projected Value of Home (4 x value of lot) Multiplied by 11 lots /homes = Total Taxable Market Value* Tax Capacity ** City Tax Rate (Unimproved Land Non - Homestead) Payable 2011 Payable 2012 (per Henn Co) 44,454.55 Estimated Price Ranges of New Homes 50,000 75,000 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 220,000 489,000 2,750,000 4,125,000 5,500,000 2,200 4,890 27,500 41,250 55,000 47% 47% 47% 47% 47% Total City Property Tax ( for all 11 parcels) 1,158.82 2,904.03 12,925.00 19,387.50 25,850.00 increase in municipal prop tax collected over current 10,020.97 16,483.47 22,945.97 *This calculation does not take into account any homestead market value exclusion, which would lessen the taxable market value used to calculate property tax. * *Tax Capacity is 1% for the first $500k and 1.25% on anything over 500k for residential property. CALCULATION OF NEGATIVE ARBITRAGE BASED ON DIFFERENT BOND RATES Bond Interest Rate (based on Ehlers rate for tax exempt 5 or 10 year) Rate of Investment Earnings (based on Wells Fargo Govt Fund Rate) negative arbitrage amount per year Bond Interest Rate (based on Ehlers rate for tax exempt 15 year) Rate of Investment Earnings (based on Wells Fargo Govt Fund Rate) negative arbitrage amount per year Bond Interest Rate (based on Ehlers rate for taxable 5 or 10 year) Rate of Investment Earnings (based on Wells Fargo Govt Fund Rate) negative arbitrage amount per year Bond Interest Rate (based on Ehlers rate for taxable 15 year) Rate of Investment Earnings (based on Wells Fargo Govt Fund Rate) negative arbitrage amount per year -491- Bond /Invested Annual Interest amount Paid /Received 2.25% 340,000 7,650 0.20% 340,000 680 (6,970) Bond /Invested Annual Interest amount Paid /Received 2.95% 340,000 10,030 0.20% 340,000 680 (9,350) Bond /Invested Annual Interest amount Paid /Received 3.50% 340,000 11,900 0.20% 340,000 680 (11,220) Bond /Invested Annual Interest amount Paid /Received 4.25% 340,000 14,450 0.20% 340,000 680 (13,770) ESTIMATED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PAYMENT SCHEDULE PROJECTED ASSESSMENT = $340,000.00 INTEREST RATE = 0.05 YEARS = 5 Tax Payable PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST Year YEAR BALANCE PAYMENT PAYMENT TOTAL 2013 1 $340,000.00 $68,000.00 $21,250.00 $89,250.00 (15 months interes 2014 2 $272,000.00 $68,000.00 $13,600.00 $81,600.00 (12 months interes 2015 3 $204,000.00 $68,000.00 $10,200.00 $78,200.00 (12 months interes 2016 4 $136,000.00 $68,000.00 $6,800.00 $74,800.00 (12 months interes 2017 5 $68,000.00 $68,000.00 $3,400.00 $71,400.00 (12 months interes TOTAL $340,000 $55,250 $395,250 5 Year Negative Arbitrage - 5 year tax exempt bonds: $34,850 ($6,970 per year x 5 years) Need to split in 11 properties... provide look back to ones that have paid... adjust principal -492- Wood/yn Ridge/ 429 Proposal Council Member Osmek requested staff to analyze the use of 429 financing in this instance. I. Analysis • Marketability of lots - Developer stated market will determine prices. No mortgage on the property and there has already been a write -down of book value, therefore reducing the cost basis and providing flexibility. Sugar Mill lots valued in mid $70's, North Saunders approx $160K per Hennepin County Assessor's office. • Political implications if project just "sits" — developer incented to move lots and will price accordingly - term of special assessments 5 years so City will fully recuperate its costs regardless of lot sales • Seek to reduce City liability /risk by requiring a letter of credit for 125% of special assessment amount • Vendor viability — JMS, an established developer, forming a partnership arrangement with Hartman Custom Homes which adds experience and expertise to the project. • Can't assess negative arbitrage — but 5% special assessment rate will help to offset • Necessity - Use of this type of financing increasing as credit markets tighten. This will be the exception, but the project would not happen in the near future otherwise. Benefits to City • Increase to property tax collection estimated to be $10K — $23K per year • 11 new home sites close to downtown could help spur development • Being in charge of improvement project reduces risk of non - performance /issues down the road III. Rate restrictions / special assessment policy Per discussion with City Bond Attorney, Mary Ipple, she recommends keeping this as a separate improvement project by holding a separate hearing (even if on the same night as the street improvement project), in order to differentiate the developer driven project from the City initiated street improvement project and to cost them separately even if bid together. The tax exempt status would not be in question as long as we treat developer driven projects the same, therefore she recommends a formal Chapter 429 financing policy. A separate project will also allow the City to assess in the same year of the project, thereby increasing probability of collecting interest for the first year. Staff recommends using the 5% Special Assessment Rate used on Street Projects -493- IV. Assessable/ recoverable costs • Plat /planning, legal and permit /inspections fees are able to be recouped through the development agreement (escrow) and the project. • Street, water, sewer, engineering, etc. estimated to be $340,000 V. G.O. Bond Impact • The tax exempt status would not be in question as long as we treat developer driven projects the same and only finance public improvement, therefore she recommends a formal Chapter 429 financing policy. • Can bond for any timeframe less than 30 years & consistent with assessment policy — Staff recommends 5 years to coincide with Special Assessment Period. • Issuance costs high on GO, should consider placing local. -494- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 24, 2012 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, January 24, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Kelli Gillispie, Heidi Gesch and David Osmek. Members absent: Councilmember Ray Salazar Others present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, City Planner Rita Trapp, Gregory Metz, Kaeden Metz, Peter Goshgarian, Matt Bolles, Lauren Hefty, Erik Meyer, David Deters, Greg Lavere, Alex Aspelin, Geroge Linkert, Jim Dustrude, Geoff & Suzi Michael, Anna Tillman, Steve Pumper, Bill Moore, Brandon Falness, Hank Heystek, Marion Finegan, John Tombers, Dorothy Anderson, Debbie Anderson, Ryan Frederickson, Katie Jo Delisle, Wells Brose, Jalyn Macy, Eric Boser, Terry Archuleta, Morgan Reinman, Betsy Baer, Ashley Loen, Carol Stodola, Sharon Schoenecker, Amanda Ficek, Alice Tillman, John Royer, Johann Chemin, B. Benz, Gloria Ely, Lewis Ely, Tom Casey, Blase Fugiha, Michael Wood, Vania Jeh, Jim Stein, Dan Higus, Jeanne Rostad, John Kohler Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Hanus acknowledged the students present and Betsy Baer came forward to represent the students from Mr. Kuehl's Advanced American Government class. Hanus thanked them for attending. 3. Approve agenda Osmek suggested the removal if Item 8 at the request of the applicant. Osmek requested the addition of Item 4H, Approve Resolution Declaring the Month of February as Mound Financial Awareness Month. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gillispie to approve the consent agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $299,730.51 -495- Mound City Council Minutes — January 24, 2012 B. Approve Pay Request No. 3 from Minger Construction in the amount of $38,994.04 for the 2011 Lift Station Improvement Project, City Project No. PW -11 -03 C. Approve Pay Request NO. 1 and Final from Michels Corporation in the amount of $129,487.80 for the 2011 CIPP Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project D. Approve 2012 Dock Location Map Addendum E. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -16: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR 5500 BREEZY ROAD F. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -17: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR 4743 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE G. Reschedule regular City Council meeting from August 14, 2012, to August 16, 2012 due to the Primary Election H. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -15: RESOLUTION DECLARING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY AS MOUND FINANCIAL AWARENESS MONTH 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens on any item not on the agenda. None were offered. 6. Public Hearing — continued from January 10, 2012 2012 Langdon Lane Cul -de -sac and Storm Sewer Improvement City Engineer Dan Faulkner reviewed the feasibility study and financing, as presented at the January 10th meeting. Mayor Hanus reconvened the hearing at 7:10 p.m. and stated that the Councilmembers that were absent at the hearing on January 10th have watched the video of that meeting so there is no need to repeat the testimony given at that time. Upon receiving no comment, Mayor Hanus closed the public hearing. Osmek stated that he doesn't think the cul -de -sac needs to be done at this time, and prefers just to do the storm sewer work at this time. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -18: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR 2012 LANGDON LANE STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT AND INCLUDING IT WITH THE 2012 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL PROJECT 7. 2011 Lift Station Improvement Project Dan Faulkner gave the details of the proposed 2012 Lift Station Improvement on the Carlow Rd. lift station. It is the 14th of our 30 lift stations to be improved, and will be incorporated with the 2012 Street Project. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gillispie to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -19: RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2012 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE 2012 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL PROJECT 8. (Removed from agenda) Mound City Council Minutes — January 24, 2012 9. Case No 11 -10 related to Comprehensive Plan amendment request(s) related to possible Walgreens redevelopment project City Planner Rita Trapp of Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. summarized the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the area to the southwest of the intersection of Lynwood and Commerce Blvds, that is being sought to facilitate the redevelopment of a portion of the site into a Walgreens retail drug store and a 1,000 square foot freestanding retail establishment. The redevelopment will also involve property transfers to modify the amount of right -of -way around the Dakota Rail Regional Trail located immediately south of the proposed redevelopment areas and behind the Lynwood Blvd. apartment parcels. She stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 6, 2011 and recommended approval of the amendment with a 6 -2 vote. Trapp informed the Council that their packet includes the public comment received at the hearing, additional input received since that time, as well as the many steps that are needed in order for the proposed redevelopment to occur. She indicated that all property owners have signed off and are willing participants in the Comp Plan change. Hanus asked if the owner of the westerly apartment building at 5701 Lynwood had an opinion on whether that parcel be included, and Mr. Goshgarian stated that he has no opinion one way of the other. He asked that, in the interest of time, the information supplied to the Council in their packet not be repeated. He asked if anyone wished to speak on this topic. Johann Chemin, 6039 Beachwood, made a powerpoint presentation suggesting that the Walgreen development be in the Auditors Road District, combined with a proposed assisted living development. Jim Dustrade, 2001 Arbor Lane, asked about the entrance, and Trapp indicated that the proposed plan has the entrance on Lynwood, to serve both pedestrians and the parking lot. Dustrade congratulated the City on moving the building to the corner, but also questioned if a location in Auditors Road may be better. John Kohler of Semper, the developer, stated that they have no issues if the apartment building at 5701 Lynwood is included or not. They looked at alternate sites, but this one merited an "A" rating and all others, including the Auditors Road, didn't. Dorothy Anderson, 6429 Bay Ridge Road, told the Council to go to the Walgreens in Monticello and they would see that people can't get in unless they go to the back door where the parking lot is. Hanus stated that the old tradition of having the buildings in the back and parking in the front has changed. Hank Heystek, 6501 Bay Ridge Road, stated he's been in Mound for 35 years and we should be trying to recreate a small Excelsior with small shops and boutiques, not a large structure of this sort with 54 parking places. He asked that they consider expanding their present location into the old clinic building. Carol Stodola, 4510 Wilshire Blvd, stated she's a 39 -year resident and loved Thrifty White and when she was in the present Walgreens she was there 35 minutes and only 2 customers were in there. She wondered how a bigger store will make them better. George Linkert, 5017 Avon, stated he is on the Planning Commission and voted against this amendment. The parking is not good now in that area and thinks Walgreens can be put further down Commerce, and that it also needs a second entrance. -497- Mound City Council Minutes — January 24, 2012 Dave Deters, owner of 2261 Commerce, stated he has been in retail since 1969 as Westonka Sports and there was always a parking problem in that area, so to if this doesn't go through, the struggle with parking will continue. This is a great project that will be an asset to Mound, and it is no different than the relocation of Jubilee or True Value, and urged the Council to continue to work with the developer and vote for the amendment. Amanda Ficek, owner of Mama's Happy, tenant of 2271 Commerce, agrees that the property owners have been offered a more than fair price and have the right to sell their property. She doesn't think there's a parking problem and has people coming from all over to her store. She is thrilled for the owners, but urges that thought go into where we want to see Mound go. John Royer, 2281 Commerce, stated he's been in business for 39 years. He could stay in Mound another 20 years and not get another offer like the one from Walgreens. He plans on relocating in Mound and thinks the development is a good thing for Mound. Sharon Schoenecker, 5870 Idlewood, states she was glad that Walgreens is willing to come to Mound and urged the Council not to move forward with this, but find a different location for Walgreens. Geoff Michael, 1713 Avocet, commended City Staff for doing a great job on this project. He stated that as a former Planning Commission member who pulls permits in four different states, he disagrees with Ms. Hanson's comment that a City can't guide development. He said they can guide development, and if Walgreens moves from their current location there will be an anchor on one end of Commerce Place open, and another on the other end vacant within one block. He asked if he was correct that 40% of the City Council sits on the Planning Commission, and that the Acting Chair at the meeting where this Comp Plan amendment was discussed, was a Council member. Hanus stated he was correct. Tom Casey, 2854 Cambridge Lane, stated he has a 7 -page memo in the council packet, and also had a letter in The Laker, and asked the Council if they had any questions regarding either. He asked that this matter be continued to the February 14th meeting so that questions could be answered. He feels the Comp Plan shouldn't be deviated from and that there is ample space elsewhere for the relocation of Walgreens. Hanus stated that some of Casey's comments are based on premise and do not apply here. Peter Johnson, 2305 Commerce, stated he is in favor of the proposal. His parcel has been used for parking for other businesses, and if he should fill his building with tenants, he will fill his own lot leaving more of a parking problem than there is now. He feels it's time to address the parking one way or another and if a private developer is willing to come in and fix the problem, they should be allowed to do that. Johann Chemin again approached the Council and asked what the building will look like and was informed that the discussion this evening is only on the Comp Plan amendment, not on the design of the building. Tom Casey asked the Council again not to make a decision tonight, and get more answers to questions that have been raised. He asked about where 68 more affordable housing units are going to come from as indicated are needed in the Comp Plan, and Osmek stated that Mound is in excess now for the Met Council requirements, even with the loss of 15 units from the one apartment building. Trapp explained that the Met Council requires the City to ensure there is IM Mound City Council Minutes — January 24, 2012 sufficient land guided for medium or high density residential to accommodate 68 units by 2020. The Comp Plan assumed that this development would occur in the Pedestrian Mixed -Use District. The proposed change does not negatively impact this part of the Comprehensive Plan. Osmek stated that he supports the proposed change in the Comp Plan, but would request leaving the property at 5701 Lynwood as is because he feels it provides a buffer to the neighborhood to the west. Gillispie stated that they have heard negativity on what could happen, but they also need to look at the other side. Gesch would like to see the property at 5701 Lynwood be removed from the amendment, also, to protect the neighborhood to the west. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to adopt the following resolution as amended to omit the property at 5701 Lynwood. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -20: RESOLUTION ADOPTING LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS GUIDED BY THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10. Approve minutes MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Hanus to approve the minutes of the January 10, 2012 meeting. The following voted in favor: Hanus and Gesch. The following voted against: None. Gillispie and Osmek abstained from voting because they were absent from that meeting. Motion carried. 11. Information /M iscel laneus A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Reports: Finance — 4t' Qtr. 2011 Investments Finance - Bolton & Menk 4th Qtr. 2011 Hrs. billed Fire Commission Agenda — 12/9/11 C. Minutes: Planning Commission — 12/6/11 D. Correspondence: Met Council — final housing score for 2011 Richard Stanek — 911 Emergency Communications Facility 12. Adiourn MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gillispie to adjourn at 9:27 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -499- Mayor Mark Hanus From: Greg [mailto:gnybeckWmcd.orc Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 2:23 PM To: 'Kandis Hanson'; Brian Heck; Michael Funk Cc: Jim Fackler Subject: Follow -up on Lake Minnetonka Coordinated Herbicide Treatments Good Afternoon: This past fall, we met to discuss what information might be provided by the LMCD relating to the coordinated herbicide treatment project on Carmans, Grays, and Phelps Bay. At that time, I indicated that the LMCD has an Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) Task Force that serves as the technical committee for this project. I also communicated that the LMCD Board of Directors has directed staff to work with the AIS Task Force on assessing the outcomes of the first four years of this project, 2008 -2011, with the goals and objectives spelled out in the Lake Vegetation Management Plan. Detailed below is a summary of where the LMCD is at on this process: The AIS Task Force met on October 21St and December 16th to discuss this. Attached are the minutes from these two meetings, although the December 16th are draft. A great deal of discussion took place at these meetings; however, there was no consensus on compliance (or non - compliance) with the goals and objectives in the LVMP. The consensus of the Task Force was for Chip Welling (MN DNR AIS Management Coordinator) to provide the LMCD Board a progress update on the first four years of this project. • Chip Welling provided the Board a progress update on January 11th, with a summary provided through the attached PowerPoint. The progress update was quite educational and informative. If you would like to view this meeting, you can go the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission website and view it on -line. The discussion started about 30 minutes into the meeting. What's next? This a good question. At some point in the next couple of months, I envision that the AIS Task Force will take this matter up again. In particular, discussion should take place with regards to possibly preparing a plan prior to 2013 on the appropriateness for mechanical harvesting and herbicide treatments on a lakewide basis. My assumption is that this will take some time and will be presented back to the LMCD Board. I will update you once I know more. • Sorry we are not further along in this process to address what we discussed in the fall. In summary, the LMCD Board has committed to this project in year 5 (2012). However, the Board's commitment beyond this is still an unknown. Please feel free to contact me with questions or concerns. Thanks and take care! Regards, Greg Nybeck LMCD Executive Director (952) 745 -0789 -500- Present Excused: Other Present: Public Present: DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION MEETING Thursday, January 19, 2012 Vice Chair Mark Drahos, Commissioners Susan Gardner, Rodney Beystrom, Cliff Schmidt, Council Representative David Osmek Chair Jim Funk Public Works Superintendent Jim Fackler, Dock Administrator Katie Hoff Mayor Mark Hanus, City Manager Bergene Vice Chair Drahos called meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1. Approval of Agenda: MOTION by Gardner to approve agenda carried unanimously. 2. Approval of October 20, 2011 M MOTION by Schmidt to a MOTION approved with,' 3. El ,N by Gardner t 'ed unanimously. D by Gardner. M 4. Comm eri#s and sugge 5. Mayor Ha n Dyer, Nate idt. MOTION SECOND by Gardner. nate rdhk,as Chair. SECOND by Osmek. MOTION PION by Osmek to nominate Drahos as Vice - Chair. N approved unanimously. from citizens present: None. ( Beystrom arrived at 7:06). nd's Centennial Presentation: Mayor Hanus summarized the upcoming Centennial celebration with the great number of volunteers needed and a very limited budget. Kandis Hanson reiterated the length and importance of the event. Range of dates are Friday, July 13th -22nd beginning with wellness weekend. Music in the Park, wine, beer and spirits tasting, roller girls, parade, entertainment, monument dedication, golf tournament, fireworks are just some of the planned events. Bruce Miller unveiling of painting will be on March 27th in council chambers. Golf tournament will be 2nd Friday at Lakeview. Celebration is not a function of the City but rather by its own self entity. Lakeside interdenominational service at Surfside and then the boat and car show along the Mound greenway. Hanson provided a handout to Commissioners of her -501- 7. thoughts /suggestions and contact people. Application blanks are on the SOTL website as well as logo for the Commissioner use. Hanus stated they don't need to worry about advertising, SOTL and the boat /car people will do that. He stated they may want to open up to people other than boat /car clubs. Hoping for cross section of different cars and boats. Commissioners will need to be there that day directing people, parking, etc. Will need to coordinate fees and registration with the festival people but other than that it is a Dock Commission event stated Mayor Hanus. Spiritofthelakes.com is festival website. Hanson stated the need for more volunteers and handed out the current committee /volunteer roster. Hanus recommended the dock commission get started right away. Hanson summarized the transient docks along the Greenway and some boat people had concerns�gardmg the milfoil in that area. Fackler stated that it is contracted to be meclical��ved in June and then July. Beystrom mentioned the MN Street R ociat►_`(,, nson said they need to start with the people on the list first but .�it's;t�ofi ex -te to just those listed. She mentioned parking for the cars /boats to be to gat as, 'ell by the commissioners. Commercial food vendors wills nd. Beyst� ��d about possibility of music. Hanus and Hanson thanked the Co - ion for the `orts. 1, 6. Discuss: Dock Location Map Addendum Cha'ftgeublic Landsrat for 5500 Breezy Road Hoff summarized the packet mate ria ,'felated'td the regWes;t of both a change in the Dock Location Map Addendum , hd a new P blic Lands Permit. She gave a brief history of the narrow channel a rid the September, 20 meeting with affected owners, water patrol andthd ,1MCD. Staff fisting the current abutting dock site in the channel be removeo fr C your Dock Location Map and the structure be altered to become tbre landing/, a dock site in the open bay be the new abutting site fotr S'S00 Breezy bnd the stipkul if a boat is moored at deck /landing in channel tho i utting site in the,o�en bay woblidthen become a non - abutting site and 5500 Breezy would no longer be considered an abutting home in the program. Nate Btirgene of 5500 Breezy st6ted to the Commission that the lake access is critical and he is satisfied with the preposal. MOTION by Osmek to approve staff recoil mendation of th6� [dock Location Map Addendum change for 5500 Breezy Road. SECOND— Qrahos. MOTION carries unanimously. MOTION by Osmek to approve the Public Lands, Permit for 5500 Breezy Road. SECOND by Gardner. MOTION carries unanimously. Fackler stated this will be on the Consent Agenda at the January 24, 2012 City Council meeting. Discuss: Public Lands Permit for 4743 Island View Drive Fackler stated the owner /applicant would like to place 50 feet of rip rap along Devon Commons at their own expense. City staff will meet with the contractor prior to start of work. MOTION by Osmek to approve the Public Lands Permit as written. SECOND by Beystrom. MOTION carries unanimously. Fackler stated this will be on the Consent Agenda at the January 24, 2012 City Council meeting. -502- 8. Review: 2012 Approved Docks Fees & Budget; 2011 Fund Balance Hoff reviewed the 2012 dock fees and stated they are unchanged from 2011. Osmek gave a review of the slip fees discussion, passed by the DCC, at the Council level and stated it was a split council and he will try to work again for change to next year's fees. Hoff reviewed the 2012 approved budget figures; dock fund balance comparison between 2010 and 2011 with large drop in fund balance due to the large rip rap projects. Fackler stated there will most likely be some new requests for rip rap coming. Osmek inquired about how the Dreamwood dock positions were proceeding. Discussion followed regarding the Settlement Agreement Exhibit A map and some abutters were surprised when the surveyed dock location weren't in the same location as their current site. Fackler stated staff hado i Attorney for .� clarification of what types of deviations from Agre0rnent ar %fed. Osmek stated Council could decide to have the City walk away lerefar .es. Fackler stated he believes once residents get used to new 1.c s it will 9. Work Rules: No changes to Work rules. MOTION by Gardr1gr Ito approvb lU k Rules as written. SECOND by Drahos. MOTION approved ua0141ft y. 10. Calendar 11. Hoff asked Commission if they'i�;Iike to add calendar.iitem regarding the Centennial Celebration tasks of the DCC t iscussion f0fl, w d am og Commissioners and no calendar item needed atth» point. MOTION by drahos to approve the Calendar as written. SECOND b.Y Gardner M�QTION carried unanimously. Council Representative; Osmek discussed that if he can't get Council to change dip fee structure he would try to get support to increase slip fees slightly to cover s He discussed the 2012 approved budget and the levy. Staff: HWf stated tha`t'4ock /slip applications were mailed out and are due back by the end of February. Fackler stated the Parks staff are building some new decking for the slips and re- staining others. Fackler stated there were no Zebra Mussels on any of our slip complexes that came out in the fall but he saw boats being pulled from Mound Bay and there were Mussels on several. Schmidt concurred they are worse on the east side of lake such as Grays Bay. Commissioner Comments: None. MOTION by Osmek to adjourn. SECOND by Drahos. Meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. -503- 8. Review: 2012 Approved Docks Fees & Budget; 2011 Fund Balance Hoff reviewed the 2012 dock fees and stated they are unchanged from 2011. Osmek gave a review of the slip fees discussion, passed by the DCC, at the Council level and stated it was a split council and he will try to work again for change to next year's fees. Hoff reviewed the 2012 approved budget figures; dock fund balance comparison between 2010 and 2011 with large drop in fund balance due to the large rip rap projects. Fackler stated there will most likely be some new requests for rip rap coming. Osmek inquired about how the Dreamwood dock positions were proceeding. Discussion followed regarding the Settlement Agreement Exhibit A map and some abutters were surprised when the surveyed dock locatiori�werer't in the same location as their current site. Fackler stated staff ha �to i qty Attorney for clarification of what types of deviations from Agrr'ent ared. Osmek stated Council could decide to have the City walk away there a%ear es Fackler stated he believes once residents get used to nev°khs it wille.� Staff: Hoff stated that dock /slip applications were mailed out and are due back by the end of February. Fackler stated the Parks staff are building some new decking for the slips and re- staining others. Fackler stated there were no Zebra Mussels on any of our slip complexes that came out in the fall but he saw boats being pulled from Mound Bay and there were Mussels on several. Schmidt concurred they are worse on the east side of lake such as Grays Bay. Commissioner Comments: None. MOTION by Osmek to adjourn. SECOND by Drahos. Meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. -503-