2012-03-13 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
AGENDA
....... ........ ........ ....... 11.11 ........ ................ ........ ... ...........
MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 13, 2012 - 7.00 PM
REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
. ......._ - ._...._ ........ _ ...... ...................................
*Consent A ems: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Page
Open meeting
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda, with any amendments
4. *Consent A eg nda
*A. Approve minutes: February 16, 2012 special meeting 583 -584
February 28, 2012 regular meeting 585 -587
*B. Approve payment of claims 588 -616
*C. Adopt Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering 617 -618
Advertisement for Bids for the 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and
Retaining Wall Improvement Project
*D. Approve Application for Exempt Permit for Mound Fire Auxiliary 619 -620
for bingo /raffle for dates; 4/3/12, 6/2/12, 11/13/12.
*E. Adopt Resolution Recognizing Bruce Miller for His Contribution 621
to the Mound Centennial
*F. Approve Public Dance Permit and Temporary On -Sale Liquor 622 -623
Applications for "The Blast" on May 19, 2012, as submitted by
Our Lady of the Lake Church (fees have been paid)
*G. Approve Resolution Approving Variances for Property at 5001 624 -659
Wilshire Blvd. (Case #12 -01)
*H. Approve Resolution Approving a Variance for Property at 4568 660 -699
Denbigh Road (Case #12 -03)
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the
agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.)
6. Public Hearing
Review /Action on Ordinance Amending Chapter 129 of the Mound City Code 700 -704
as it Relates to the Zoning Ordinance
7. Discussion/action on Planning Case No. I 1 -11 705 -719
Variance modification — area identification sign at Mound MarketPlace
2125 Commerce Blvd. — Applicant: Mound Marketplace LLC
8. Discussion/action on Policy on Use of Chapter 429 for Private Developer 720 -722
Projects
9. Discussion/action on establishing precincts and polling places
A. Adopt Resolution Establishing Precincts
B. Adopt Resolution Establishing Polling Places
723 -728
729
10. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager
B. Reports: Finance Department — February 2012 730 -732
C. Minutes: None
D. Correspondence: Letters of resignation from Katie Hoff, Heidi Tumberg 733 -735
and Jerry Bricko
11. Adjourn
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting
agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www.cityofmound.com.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL
Thursday, February 16, 2012
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special
session on Thursday, February 16, 2012 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of city
hall.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Kelli Gillispie, Dave Osmek,
Ray Salazar, and Heidi Gesch.
Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Finance Director Catherine Pausche,
Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Attorney John Dean, Jeff Andersen,
Shirley Andersen, Blaze Fugina, Deb Lowden, Lyn Conway, John Beise
1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
2. Presentation and discussion with representatives from Schafer Richardson
and Common Bond about preliminary concept plan for redevelopment of the
Commerce Place Shoppina Center (north portion)
Maureen Michalski of Schafer Richardson and Jenna Oscarson from Common Bond
Communities appeared before the Council with a preliminary concept plan for possible
future redevelopment of the north portion of the existing Commerce Place shopping
center for multi - family residential use to include 52 new rental units. Ms. Michalski
provided a brief overview of Schafer Richardson and explained preliminary details of the
Bay Breeze Commons concept proposal such as the site plan and anticipated rent
structure. It was noted that a similar concept plan was presented to the Council last year.
Ms. Oscarson provided some background on Common Bond as well as their previous
projects. They are looking for a letter of support from the Council which would be part
of their anticipated funding requests for the project which includes the use of tax credits.
Discussion took place about the current vacancies at the center including the former
Ridgeview Clinic space which has been unoccupied since 2007 and that redevelopment
of the north portion could spur a future redo of the south end. Councilmember Osmek
stated that TIF was used for the original shopping center project and commented that he
does not want to lose taxes as a result of a project. The displacement of the existing
tenants, who are longstanding businesses in Mound, was discussed and it was noted by
Ms. Michalski that tenants would be eligible for relocation benefits and could possibly
choose to locate in the south portion of the center which currently includes Walgreens.
The Council took no action. Mayor Hanus offered two informal conditions to the
developer representatives which included no loss of tax revenues and that written
agreements with the center tenants acknowledging their agreement with the move be
provided.
3. Update and discussion on the status of Police and Fires Shared Services
Discussions wit h the City of Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius
Mayor Hanus gave an update of the shared services discussions with the City of
Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius for Police and Fire Services. The Mayor summarized a
proposal he made to the City of Minnetrista on December 12, 2011, that would lengthen
the term to 10 years from 3 years for our current contract for fire services as well as
-583 -
1
expand the coverage area to all of Minnetrista. This may or may not involve a
subcontract with St. Boni Fire, depending on their willingness to cooperate. Mound will
be meeting with representatives of St. Boni on February 23, 2012 to discuss options.
The proposal also included the concept of a 10 year contract for police services to be
provided by Minnetrista to Mound and housed out of the new Minnetrista Public Safety
building. This will require Mound to find another use for the police portion of the Mound
Public Safety building, but the potential in savings may justify this plan. Minnetrista is to
present their proposal for Police Services on March 1, 2012. Although no official vote
was taken, members of the council agreed in concept with the approach taken in these
discussions.
4. Adiourn
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adjourn the meeting at 8:24 p.m. All voted
in favor. Motion carried.
Submitted by Sarah Smith
-584-
2
Chair Mark Hanus
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
February 28, 2012
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on
Tuesday, February 28, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall.
Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, Heidi
Gesch and David Osmek.
Others present: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Acting City Manager Catherine Pausche, Public Works
Director Carlton Moore, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, Craig Vaugn, Amy Gurski, Russ Nettle,
Gina Nettle, Kevin Borg, Blaze Fugina,
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent
Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
4. Consent agenda
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to approve the consent agenda as presented. Upon
roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve minutes of February 14, 2012 regular meeting
B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $216,223.36
C. Approve Professional Services Agreement with Community Mediation Services, Inc.
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
None were offered.
6. 2012 Street. Utility and Retaining Wall Project
Dan Faulkner of Bolton & Menk presented a report addressing three concerns that were raised
at the improvement hearing of November 8, 2011, as directed by the City Council: (1)
Watermain replacement on Cambridge Lane from Manchester to Brighton Blvd. Staff added a
needed watermain valve, and in doing so observed that the 50 -year old watermain is in
surprisingly good condition, and as a result recommend that it be kept in service and not
replaced as originally proposed in the Feasibility Report; (2) 90 feet of Cambridge Lane north of
Manchester. Staff completed additional evaluation of this section of roadway and recommends
that it be reconstructed as originally proposed; (3) Kildare Road, from Kerry Road west to end.
-585-
Mound City Council Minutes — February 28, 2012
After research it was determined that this road was constructed in approximately 1999, and staff
feels it is currently in acceptable condition, but cautions that waiting to complete improvements
in the future may be more costly when done without the benefit of being part of a large project.
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gillispie to adopt the following resolution. The following voted
in favor: Gillispie, Salazar, Hanus and Osmek. The following voted against: Gesch. Motion
carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -26: RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 11 -77,
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR 2012
STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL PROJECT
7. Three Rivers Park District Trail Crossing at CSAH 16
Craig Vaugn of SRF Consulting Group gave a presentation to the Council, outlining the
proposed project that will re -align the Three Rivers District Park Trail as it crosses CSAH 15.
This project will be a cooperative effort of Three Rivers, Hennepin County and the City of
Mound. The crossing as it is configured today, presents hazards and the re- alignment will
hopefully alleviate some of these hazards. The studies done revealed that the use of the trail is
about 400 /day during the week and 1100 /day during the week -ends. It was also noted that
about 5% of the users didn't stop before crossing CSAH 15. It was noted that the City's cost for
this project will not exceed $10,300, and that MSA funds will be available to use for this project.
MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Gesch to approve the Agreement for Cost Participation with
Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
8. Update on School District Happenings
Westonka Schools Superintendent Kevin Borg appeared before the Council with his annual
update on school district happenings. He highlighted academic achievement, the strong
financial foundation, and their school facilities. He also complimented the Police Chief, Public
Works, and City Staff for the level of service given the community and the schools.
9. Contract with Specialized Environmental Technologies (SET)
Catherine Pausche expressed concern over the contract with SET, for residential waste
disposal of grass clippings, milfoil, and leaves. She expressed that there needs to be better
accountability for the amount of usage that Mound residents are dumping. Hanus suggested no
less than a monthly report and Osmek stated to continue it this year, with usage documented.
Pausche will devise a logging and audit process for usage.
10. Review /discussion /action on amending 2011 Final Overall Budget
Pausche reviewed the requested amendments.
:.
Mound City Council Minutes — February 28, 2012
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to adopt the following resolution and to approve the
transfer of the $50,000 that was originally transferred from the General Fund to the Street Light
Replacement Project (MSA funds covered the Street Light expense), to the Public Works /Parks
Maintenance Facility Project to cover the streets /parks portion of the project expenses to date.
All voted in favor. Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -27: RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE 2011 FINAL OVERALL BUDGET
11. Information /Miscellaneous
A. Comments /reports from Council mem bers/City Manager
B. Reports: WeCAB staff reports — 1/4/12 and 2/1/12
Finance Department - January 2012
C. Minutes: Planning Commission 1/3/12
D. Correspondence: Gillespie Gazette
Letter of 2/2/12 from Winsted Investments regarding Halstead
Mobile Home Park update
12. Adiourn
MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adjourn at 8:33 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-587-
Mayor Mark Hanus
City of Mound Claims as of 03 -13 -12
YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT
2011
2011CITYAP7
$
41,782.50
2011
2011CITYAP8
$
29,520.50
2011
2011CITYAP9
$
11356.19
2012
ELAN2 -21 -12
$
21893.88
2012
0224CITYMAN
$
918.00
2012
0228CITYMAN
$
8,127.85
2012
BOLTONMENK01
$
40,806.50
2012
03132012CITY
$
67,176.53
2012
03132012HWS
$
75,867.83
TOTAL CLAIMS
$
268,449.78
-588-
CITY OF MOUND 02/27/12 4:24 PM
Payments Page 1
r....
CITY OF MOUND
Batch Name 2011 CITYAP7
Payments
Current Period: December 2011
User Dollar Amt $41,782.50
Computer Dollar Amt $41,782.50
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 INFRA TECH _
AP Payment E 401 -43101 -500 Capital Outlay FA CURED IN PLACE PIPE REPAIRS -2011
STREET IMPROV PROJ SW ISLAND AREA
PW 11 -01
Invoice PR12118 2/9/2012 Project PW1101
AP Payment E 401 -43127 -500 Capital Outlay FA CURED IN PLACE PIPE REPAIRS -2011
STREET IMPROV PROJ HIGHLANDS AREA
PW 11 -02
Invoice PR12118 2/9/2012 Project PW1102
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total
Fund Summary
20200 Accounts Payable
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $41,782.50
$41,782.50
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $41,782.50
Total $41,782.50
:•
$38,022.50
$3,760.00
$41,782.50
-590-
CITY OF MOUND
02/28/12 8:54 AM
Page 1
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: December 2011
Batch Name 2011CITYAP8 User Dollar Amt $29,520.50
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $29,520.50
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 8 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
_
AP Payment
E 401 - 43111 -300 Professional Srvs
2012 LANGDON CUL -DE -SAC PROJECT PIN
$787.50
12 -02- SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12 -31 2011
Invoice 0145378
1/31/2012
Project PW1202
AP Payment
E 401 -43161 -300 Professional Srvs
STREET LIGHT REPLACEMENT PROJECT
$71.00
PW11 -07 ENGINEERING SVCS 12 -10 THRU
12-312011
Invoice 0145386
1/31/2012
Project PW1107
AP Payment
E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs
I & I ANALYSIS; 2011 CIPP PROJECT SVCS
$1,515.00
12 -10 THRU 12-312011
Invoice 0145381
1/31/2012
AP Payment
E 401 -43112 -300 Professional Srvs
2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROJECT PIN
$12,764.50
12 -01 ENGINEERING SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12-
31 2011
Invoice 0145400
1/31/2012
Project PW1201
AP Payment
E 402 -43120 -300 Professional Srvs
MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12-
$639.00
312011
Invoice 0145384
1/31/2012
AP Payment
E 401 -43101 -300 Professional Srvs
2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROJ PW11 -01
$2,904.50
ENGINEER SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12-312011
Invoice 0145387
1/31/2012
Project PW1101
AP Payment
E 401 -43127 -300 Professional Srvs
2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02
$1,969.00
ENGINEER SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12-312011
Invoice 0145389
1/31/2012
Project PW1102
AP Payment
E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS 12 -10 THRU
$595.00
12 -31 2011
Invoice 0145391
1/31/2012
AP Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT
$2,227.00
ENGINEERING SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12 -31 2011
Invoice 0145393
1/31/2012
AP Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2011 LIFT STATIONS PROJECT PIN 11-
$2,873.00
03ENGINEERING SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12 -31
2011
Invoice 0145395
1/31/2012
Project PW1103
AP Payment
E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2012 IVD WINDSOR RD WATERMAIN LOOP
$1,289.00
PROJECT PIN 12 -07 ENGINEERING SVCS 12-
10 THRU 12 -31 2011
Invoice 0145397
1/31/2012
Project PW1207
AP Payment
E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs
2012 STORM DRAIN IMPROV PROJ. PW12 -05
$520.00
ENGINEERING SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12-312011
Invoice 0145403
1/31/2012
Project PW1205
AP Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2012 LIFT STATION PROJECTS PW12 -03
$1,008.50
ENGINEERING SVCS 12 -10 THRU 12-312011
Invoice 0145405
1/31/2012
Project PW1203
AP Payment
E 101 -43100 -300 Professional Srvs
MISC ENGINEERING 12 -10 THRU 12 -31 -2011
$357.50
Invoice 0145378
1/31/2012
Transaction Date
2/27/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total
$29,520.50
-590-
CITY OF MOUND
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: December 2011
20200 Accounts Payable
$357.50
$18,496.50
$639.00
$1,289.00
$7,623.50
$1,115.00
$29,520.50
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $29,520.50
Total $29,520.50
-591-
02/28/12 8:54 AM
Page 2
CITY OF MOUND 03/08/1210:18 AM
Payments Page 1
�► 1
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: December 2011
Batch Name 2011CITYAP9 User Dollar Amt $1,356.19
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,356.19
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 2 CLARK, KEITH & JANICE _
AP Payment E 401 -43101 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2011 STREET IMPROV PROJECT UTILITY $465.60
EASEMENT 3325 WARNER RD- CLARK -PW-
11-01
Invoice 03132012 3/7/2012 Project PW1101
Transaction Date 3/8/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $465.60
Refer 3 KREPPS, SUSAN & DIAMOND, MA _
AP Payment E 401 -43101 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2011 STREET IMPROV PROJECT UTILITY $436.59
EASEMENT 4834 HANOVER RD-
KREPPS /DIAMON D- PW -11 -01
Invoice 031312 3/7/2012 Project PW1101
Transaction Date 3/8/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $436.59
Refer 1 LUUKKONEN, PAUL _
AP Payment E 401 -43101 -500 Capital Outlay FA
2011 STREET IMPROV PROJECT UTILITY $454.00
EASEMENT 4902 DRUMMOND-LUUKKONEN-
PW-11-01
Invoice 03132012 3/7/2012 Project PW1101
Transaction Date 3/8/2012 Due 12/31/2011 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $454.00
Fund Summary
20200 Accounts Payable
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $1,356.19
$1,356.19
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,356.19
Total $1,356.19
-592-
f............. _
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: February 2012
03/01/12 1:41 PM
Page 1
Invoice 02212012 1/13/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 02212012 1/20/2012 PO 23953
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 02212012 1/9/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
Invoice 02212012 1/6/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply
KEYBOARD & CUSHION FOR K. HANSON
AMAZON.COM
HOTEL RESERVATION R. HANSON MN
RURAL WATER CONFERENCE ST. CLOUD
MARCH 6 -8
Project 12 -2
NORTHERN TOOL BALL DUAL PURPOSE, HI
VIZ EAR MUFF
NORTHERN TOOL PROTECTIVE
PROFESSIONAL EAR MUFFS
Invoice 02212012 1/6/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms KOHLS CLOTHING ALLOWANCE FACKLER
Invoice 02212012 1/22/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic INET 7 INTERNET SERVICES THRU JAN 19
2012
Invoice 02212012 1/19/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA SHOP COMPUTER SEWER DEPT DELL
BUSINESS ONLINE
Invoice 02212012 1/9/2012 PO 23648
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft MALWAREBYTES VIRUS SOFTWARE FOR
NEW PW LAPTOP
Invoice 02212012 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 02212012 1/17/2012
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 02212012 1126/2012
Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 02212012 1/19/2012 PO 23362
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 02212012 1/20/2012 PO 23362
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 02212012 1/25/2012
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 02212012 1/27/2012
NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC MOUND FIRE
DEPARTMENT WEBSITE HOSTING FEE - 3
YEARS
NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC WEBSITE
RENEWAL CREDIT
AMAZON MARKETPLACE 12 & 14" WATER
BLADES -FIRE TRUCKS
AMAZON MARKETPLACE CHAMOIS FIRE
DEPTS
MN FIRE CERTIFICATION BOARD- TESTS
FOR FIREFIGHTER 1 CERT - D. HEILAND, G.
BERTHIAUME, J BRYCE
PAYPAL -FIRE TRUCK ADVERTISING UNIT
#18
-593-
$46.68
$451.98
$99.74
$292.28
$119.97
$53.80
$852.74
$19.96
$251.64
- $35.00
$110.45
$114.64
$225.00
$35.00
_ CITY OF MOUND 03/01/12 1:41 PM
Page 2
Payments
..�. 1
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: February 2012
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
ROOM RESERVATION B. BERENT & H. $298.40
STRICKLEN MN RURAL WATER
CONFERENCE ST. CLOUD MARCH 6 -8
Invoice 02212012 1/9/2012
Project 12 -2
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training
ROOM CANCELLATION REFUND B. BERENT - $298.40
& H. STRICKLEN MN RURAL WATER
CONFERENCE ST. CLOUD MARCH 6 -8
Invoice 02212012 1/9/2012
Project 12 -2
Transaction Date 2/28/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,893.88
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$867.47
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$701.73
602 SEWER FUND
$1,324.68
$2,893.88
Pre - Written Check $2,893.88
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00
Total $2,893.88
-594-
CITY OF MOUND 02/24/12 3:42 PM
Page 1
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: February 2012
Batch Name 0224CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $918.00
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $918.00
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 MCLEOD COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow
BAIL MONEY FOR McLEOD County Warrant
$400.00
#43VB103879 - J. Gazette
Invoice 02242012 2/23/2012
Transaction Date 2/24/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$400.00
Refer 2 MINNESOTA DEPT NATURAL RES
_
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic
LICENSE FOR UTILITY TO CROSS PUBLIC
$518.00
WATERS -50 YEAR PERIOD
Invoice 022412 2/23/2012 PO 23669
Transaction Date 2/24/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$518.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$400.00
601 WATER FUND
$518.00
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $918.00
Total $918.00
$918.00
-595-
CITY OF MOUND 02/28/12 9:18 AM
Page 1
Payments
...�.
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: February 2012
Batch Name 0228CITYMAN
Payment Computer Dollar Amt $8,127.85 Posted
Refer 7 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN Ck# 040284 2/28/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -300 Professional Srvs LEGAL SERVICES HRA REVIEW & MTGS
JAN 2012
Invoice 1/31/2012
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$379.50
$379.50
Refer 1 KNOX COMPANY Ck# 040285 2/28/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -401 Building Repairs
KNOX BOXES FOR CITY HALL, TRANSIT
$30.00
CENTER & PUBLIC WORKS BLDGS-
BALANCE DUE
Invoice 12- 1431831/1/2012 PO 23366
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies
KNOX BOXES FOR CITY HALL, TRANSIT
$30.00
CENTER & PUBLIC WORKS BLDGS-
BALANCE DUE
Invoice 12- 1431831/1/2012 PO 23366
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -401 Building Repairs
KNOX BOXES FOR CITY HALL, TRANSIT
$30.00
CENTER & PUBLIC WORKS BLDGS-
BALANCE DUE
Invoice 12- 1431831/1/2012 PO 23366
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$90.00
Refer 2 LAW ENFORCEMENT EXPLORER, Ck# 040286 2/28/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -22806 Police Explorers
1/2 EXPLORER STATE CONFERENCE
$545.00
REGISTRATION FEE- 4 EXPLORERS, 2
ADVISORS
Invoice 022812 2/24/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -22805 Police Forfeiture Program
1/2 EXPLORER STATE CONFERENCE
$289.00
REGISTRATION FEE- 4 EXPLORERS, 2
ADVISORS
Invoice 022812 2/24/2012
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$834.00
Refer 3 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Ck# 040287 2/28/2012
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -438 Licenses and Taxes
PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSE 70850B
$10.00
Invoice ABR00426711 2/15/2012
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -438 Licenses and Taxes
PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSE 70850B
$10.00
Invoice ABR00426711 2/15/2012
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -438 Licenses and Taxes
PRESSURE VESSEL LICENSE 668358
$10.00
Invoice ABR00419761 2/15/2012
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$30.00
Refer 4 SOJOURNER DOMESTIC VOILENC Ck# 040288 2/28/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic
2012 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVOCACY
$3,500.00
SERVICES
Invoice 022812 2/16/2012 PO 23843
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 0
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,500.00
Refer 6 VERIZON WIRELESS Ck# 040289 2/28/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012
$34.49
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012
$50.16
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
-596-
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: February 2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 2700682022 2/13/2012
02/28/12 9:18 AM
Page 2
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012 $22.06
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012 $249.09
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012 $14.60
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012 $234.95
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012
$218.03
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012
$173.09
CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 THRU 2 -13 -2012
$82.49
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,078.96
Refer 5 WAYZATA, CITY OF Ck# 040290 2/28/2012
Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -438 Licenses and Taxes SALES TAX & REGISTRATION PLATES FOR $553.85
2012 FORD F550 PUBLIC WORKS
Invoice 022812 2/23/2012 PO 23670
Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -438 Licenses and Taxes
Invoice 022812 2/23/2012 PO 23670
Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -438 Licenses and Taxes
Invoice 022812 2/23/2012 PO 23670
SALES TAX & REGISTRATION PLATES FOR
2012 FORD F550 PUBLIC WORKS
SALES TAX & REGISTRATION PLATES FOR
2012 FORD F550 PUBLIC WORKS
$221.54
$1,440.00
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,215.39
Fund Summary
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
602 SEWER FUND
601 WATER FUND
285 MOUND HRA
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
101 GENERAL FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$553.85
$213.09
$449.57
$30.00
$92.49
$6,788.85
$8,127.85
Pre - Written Check $8,127.85
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00
Total $8,127.85
-597-
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: February 2012
Batch Name BOLTONMENK01 User Dollar Amt $40,806.50
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $40,806.50
Refer 1 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA
Cash Payment E 401 -43111 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145379 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145380 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145382 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145383 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 402 -43120 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145385
1/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 401 -43101 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145388
1/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 401 -43127 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145390
1/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145392
1/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0145394
1/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0145396
1/31/2012
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 0145398 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145399 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs
Invoice 0145401 1/31/2012
Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs
$0.00 In Balance
02/28/12 8:18 AM
Page 1
2012 LANGDON CUL -DE -SAC PROJECT PW $649.50
12 -02- SVCS THRU JAN 20 2012
Project PW 1202
WCA ADMINISTRATION STORMWATER $255.00
SVCS THRU JAN 20 2012
I & I ANALYSIS; 2011 CIPP PROJECT SVCS $7,713.00
THRU JAN 20 2012
SWPPP UPDATE SVCS THRU JAN 20 2012 $42.50
MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU JAN 20 $524.50
2012
2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROJ PW11 -01 $3,750.50
ENGINEER SVCS THRU JAN 20 2012
Project PW1101
2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02 $3,582.50
ENGINEER SVCS THRU JAN 20 2012
Project PW1102
SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU JAN $618.00
202012
2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT $978.00
ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JAN 20 2012
2011 LIFT STATIONS PROJECT PW 11-
$1,634.00
03ENGINEERING SVCS TJRU JAN 20 2012
Project PW1103
2012 IVD WINDSOR RD WATERMAIN LOOP
$4,993.00
PROJECT PW 12 -07 ENGINEERING SVCS
THRU JAN 20 2012
Project PW1207
2011 STORM DRAIN IMPROV PROJ. PW11 -05
$71.00
ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JAN20 2012
Project PW1105
2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROJ. PW 12-
$11,920.50
01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU JAN 20 2012
Project PW1201
RIDGEWOOD DICKENS DRAINAGE
$604.50
CHANNEL PROJ PW 11 -02
Invoice 0145402 1/31/2012 Project PW1102
Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs 2012 STORM DRAIN IMPROV. PROJ PW 12- $355.00
05 ENGINEERING SVCSTHRU JAN 20 2012
Invoice 0145404 1/31/2012 Project PW1205
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2012 LIFT STATION PROJECTS PW12 -03 $3,115.00
ENGINEERING SVCSTHRU JAN 20 2012
Invoice 0145406 1/31/2012 Project PW1203
Transaction Date 2/27/2012 Wells Fs_ 10100 Total $40,806.50
........ ......
-
CITY OF MOUND
Fund Summary
401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS
402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: February 2012
10100 Wells Fargo
$19,903.00
$524.50
$4,993.00
$13,440.00
$1,946.00
$40,806.50
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $40,806.50
Total $40,806.50
-599-
02/28/12 8:18 AM
Page 2
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
03/08/12 10:58 AM
Page 1
Batch Name 03132012CITY User Dollar Amt $67,176.53
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $67,176.53
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 3D SPECIALTIES
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms PUBLIC WORKS STAFF CITY LOGO YELLOW
$881.34
T- SHIRTS
Invoice 438440 2/21/2012 Project 12 -3
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$881.34
Refer 2 A -1 RENTAL OF LAKE MINNETONK
Cash Payment G 101 -23226 Celebrate Greater Mound TRAIL CROSSING SIGN RENTALS FOR CTY
$96.96
RD 15 MOONLIGHT TRAIL NIGHT CGM
EVENT
Invoice 81603 2/6/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$96.96
Refer 3 ALLIED WASTE
Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -440 Other Contractual Servic CITY WIDE RECYCLING SERVICE FEB 2012
$14,280.21
Invoice 0894- 002790720 2/25/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$14,280.21
Refer 4 ALLIED WASTE
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa MARCH 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE
$102.57
Invoice 0894 - 002791055 2/25/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa MARCH 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE
$98.28
Invoice 0894 - 002793797 2/25/2012 Project 12 -3
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa MARCH 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE
$297.56
Invoice 0894 - 002791698 2/25/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa MARCH 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE
$98.63
Invoice 0894- 002793795 2/25/2012
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa MARCH 2012 GARBAGE SERVICE
$98.63
Invoice 0894- 002793795 2/25/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$695.67
Refer 5 ASSURED ASPHALT CORPORA TIO
Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CUT DUPLICATE KEYS
$53.70
Invoice 63156 3/2/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$53.70
Refer 7 ATLANTIC TACTICAL
Cash Payment G 101 -23215 Emerg Respond Unit Lake Ar 16 ERU UNIFORMS - PARKAS, TROUSERS,
$2,056.94
JACKETS
Invoice SI- 80386354 2/20/2012 PO 23828
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,056.94
Refer 6 BENIEK PROPERTY S VCS INC.
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic CBD COMMERCIAL SNOWPLOWING 2 -21
$3,090.00
Invoice 138817 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,090.00
Refer 20 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY _
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE, CREAMER, COCOA
$86.50
Invoice 998504 2/22/2012
-600-
•..rr
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
03/08/12 10:58 AM
Page 2
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.50
Refer 8 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/140 _
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -220 Repair /Maint Supply BULBS FOR POLICE SQUADS -2010 CHEVY $8.21
TAHOE
Invoice 6974 - 177138 2/27/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts
Invoice 6974 - 176428 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
Invoice 6974 - 176641 2/16/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 6974 - 176641 2/16/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
SUSPENSION ENHANCEMENT SYSTEM $319.30
VEHICLE #209
Project 12 -3
INCANDESCENT SEALED BEAM #1105 $8.97
POLY GUARD NON DETERGENT FOR SHOP $4.47
COMPRESSOR
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $340.95
Refer 9 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities 3303 WATERBURY GAS SERVICE 1 -20 THRU $15.82
2 -20 -12
Invoice 031312 2/22/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.82
Refer 10 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
Invoice 00065674 2/29/2012
Transaction Date 317/2012
HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL
$16.12
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16.12
Refer 11 DAVIS, TOM _
E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 3668934
Cash Payment R 281 -45210 -34735 Multiple Slip Permits
REFUND OVERPAYMENT OF DOCK FEE 2012
$50.00
Invoice 031312 312/2012
2/20/2012
Cash Payment
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$50.00
Refer 21 FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC, HENNEPIN
E 101 -41920 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 3668934
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -433 Dues and Subscriptions
2012 MOUND FIRE DEPT DUES
$100.00
Invoice 03132012 3/7/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$100.00
Refer 12 FITTEST, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment G 101 -23215 Emerg Respond Unit Lake Ar
17 FIT TEST POLICE SWAT
$476.00
Invoice 666 2/22/2012 PO 23846
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$476.00
Refer 13 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA
Cash Payment
E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 3668934
2/20/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 3668934
2/20/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 3668934
2/20/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -41920 -321 Telephone & Cells
Invoice 3668934
2/20/2012
NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 02 -20 -12 THRU 3- $150.28
20 -12
NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 02 -20 -12 THRU 3- $150.28
20 -12
NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 02 -20 -12 THRU 3- $150.28
20 -12
NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 02 -20 -12 THRU 3- $300.54
20 -12
-601-
CITY OF MOUND 03/08/1210:58 AM
Payments Page 3
•..r•
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: March 2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $751.38
Refer 14
FRONTIER(CITIZENS COMMUNICA
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$427.75
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
MAT SERVICE 2 -27 -12
$55.88
Cash Payment
E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$427.75
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
Invoice 1006624495 3/5/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$440.71
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$115.97
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
MAT SERVICE 2 -20 -12
$93.67
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$536.17
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
Refer 17 G & K SERVICES _
Cash Payment
E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$909.01
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
Cash Payment E 60149400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
Cash Payment
E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$378.76
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
UNIFORM SERVICE 2 -13 -12
$29.66
Cash Payment
E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells
PHONE SERVICE 2 -30 -12 THRU 03 -29 -12
$227.25
Invoice 031312
2/29/2012
Invoice 1006591503 2/13/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells
INSTALL LINE TO LIFT STATION @5972
$173.83
Refer 18 G & K SERVICES _
SUNSET RD 2 -23 -12
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 031312 2/29/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,637.20
Refer 15 G & K SERVICES _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MAT SERVICE 2 -27 -12
$55.88
Invoice 1006613381 2/27/2012
Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MAT SERVICE & SUPPLIES 3 -05 -12
$174.45
Invoice 1006624495 3/5/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
MAT SERVICE & SUPPLIES 3 -05 -12
$78.30
Invoice 1006624490 3/5/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$308.63
Refer 16 G & K SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -460 Janitorial Services
MAT SERVICE 2 -20 -12
$93.67
Invoice 1006602437 2/20/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$93.67
Refer 17 G & K SERVICES _
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SERVICE 2 -13 -12
$23.21
Invoice 1006591503 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 60149400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SERVICE 2 -13 -12
$25.69
Invoice 1006591503 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SERVICE 2 -13 -12
$29.66
Invoice 1006591503 2/13/2012
Cash Payment E 60249450 -230 Shop Materials
MAT SERVICE & SHOP SUPPLIES 2 -13 -12
$194.72
Invoice 1006591503 2/13/2012
Project 12 -3
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$273.28
Refer 18 G & K SERVICES _
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies
MAT SERVICE & SHOP SUPPLIES 2 -20 -12
$146.17
Invoice 1006602438 2/20/2012
-602-
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
L....... _..........
CITY OF MOUND
03/08/12 10:58 AM
Page 4
Current Period: March 2012
_
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SERVICE 2 -20 -12
$44.66
invoice 1006602438 2/20/2012
Invoice 34011 3/1/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies
MAT SERVICE & SHOP SUPPLIES 2 -27 -12
$56.80
Invoice 1006613387 2/27/2012
Invoice 34011 3/1/2012
Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
UNIFORM SERVICE 2 -27 -12
$40.15
Invoice 1006613387 2/27/2012
Refer 24 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$287.78
Refer 19 GFOA NATIONAL _
Invoice 3312498 2/24/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions
MEMBERSHIP DUES 5 -1 -12 THRU 4 -30 -13 C.
$170.00
PAUSCHE
Invoice 0123003 2/27/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $170.00
Refer 23 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
_
Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -395 Gopher One -Call
LOCATES FEBRUARY 2012
$29.78
Invoice 34011 3/1/2012
Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -395 Gopher One -Call
LOCATES FEBRUARY 2012
$29.77
Invoice 34011 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$59.55
Refer 24 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -227 Chemicals
150 LB CHLORINE CYLINDER
$15.00
Invoice 3312498 2/24/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$15.00
__... ....... _.._ __
Refer 22 HEILAND, DAN _
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training
Invoice 031312 3/6/2012
REIMBURSE MILEAGE TO HENNEPIN TECH $156.51
FIREFIGHTER 1 CLASS 1 -17 THRU 3 -6 -12
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $156.51
Refer 25 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE & ADMIN FEE JANUARY 2012 $784.16
Invoice 120138033 1/31/2012
Transaction Date 3 /7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $784.16
Refer 26 HOME DEPOT /GECF (PM0 _
Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies TROUBLELITE W /OUTLET, SIDE GAUGE, $34.63
SIDEMOUNT CHROME GAUGE, BLOW GUN
KIT
Invoice 03132012 2/15/2012 Project 12 -3
Transaction Date 3 /7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $34.63
Refer 27 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -202 Duplicating and copying COPIER RENTAL FEE 12 -13 -11 THRU 3 -12 -12 $158.72
Invoice 86525820 2/23/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $158.72
Refer 40 INTRCOMM TECHNOLOGY _
Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic MARCH 2012 MANAGED SVC & NETWORK $1,800.00
MAINTENANCE
Invoice 124348 3/1/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic MARCH 2012 FEE FOR ONLINE POLICE $50.00
REPOor cnoM
Invoice 124348 3/1/2012 -603-
CITY OF MOUND 03/08/12 10:58 AM
�� ----- -- ••...,•� Page 5
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: March 2012
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic JAN /FEB 2012 ADDTL TROUBLESHOOTING &
$34.39
COMPUTER/WEBSITE SUPPORT
Invoice 65169
2/2/2012
Transaction Date 317/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,884.39
Refer 28
ISLAND PARK SKELLY _
Cash Payment
E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SQUAD #845 REPLACE HEATER/AC DOOR
$566.44
ACTUATOR MOTOR, MOUNT, BALANCE &
ROTATE TIRES
Invoice 32544
2/22/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SQUAD #842 BRAKE FLUID, MOUNT,
$109.26
BALANCE & ROTATE TIRES, FRONT END
ALIGNMENT
Invoice 32512
2/13/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$675.70
Refer 29
ISS FACILITY SERVICES MINNEAP _
Cash Payment
E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic EVERGLAZE FLOOR TILE SEALANT CITY
$869.70
HALL
Invoice 249533 2/27/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $869.70
Refer 30 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR _
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice MIN03120319 3/1/2012
Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -460 Janitorial Services
Invoice MIN03120326 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Refer 31 JUBILEE FOODS
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 031312 3/2/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 031312 3/3/2012
Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense
Invoice 031312 2/29/2012
CONTRACTED JANITORIAL SERVICE $540.30
MARCH 2012 CITY HALL
CONTRACTED JANITORIAL SERVICE $267.19
MARCH 2012 PUBLIC WORKS
Project 12 -3
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $807.49
AA BATTERIES $2.35
BANDAGES $2.63
FIRE COMMISSION MTG BEVERAGES 2 -29- $10.28
12
Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow BALLOONS FOR DARE GRADUATION $24.41
CEREMONY
Invoice 031312 2/15/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $39.67
Refer 32 KAUTZER, KEVIN _
Cash Payment R 281 -45210 -34725 Dock Permits
Invoice 031312 2/28/2012
Cash Payment R 281 -45210 -34705 LMCD Fees
Invoice 031312 2/28/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
REFUND DOCK FEES - NON - RESIDENT- NOT $300.00
ELIGIBLE FOR PROGRAM- KAUTZER, KEVIN
1701 AVOCET LANE
REFUND LMCD FEES - NON - RESIDENT- NOT $18.75
ELIGIBLE FOR PROGRAM- KAUTZER, KEVIN
1701 AVOCET LANE
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $318.75
Refer 63 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN
- -604-
2012
Invoice 106743 2/10/2012
Cash Payment
CITY OF MOUND
03/08/12 10:58 AM
Page 6
Payments
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
CITY OF MOUND
SHORELINE DR #11 -09 LEGAL SVCS JAN
$237.00
Current Period: March 2012
Cash Payment
E 10141600 -300 Professional Srvs EXECUTIVE LEGAL SVCS JAN 2012
$960.00
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -41600 -300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SVCS JAN 2012
$603.00
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -41600 -314 Legal P/W PUBLIC WORKS LEGAL SVCS JAN 2012
$168.00
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
G 101-232316301 Lynwood #10 -07, Wood WOODLYN RIDGE #10 -07 LEGAL SVCS JAN
$186.00
2012
Invoice 106743 2/10/2012
Cash Payment
G 101 -23247 WALGREENS #11 -10 SEMP WALGREENS /SEMPER #11 -10 LEGAL SVCS
$412.00
JAN 2012
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
G 101 -23245 4839/4851 SHORELINE #11-
SHORELINE DR #11 -09 LEGAL SVCS JAN
$237.00
2012
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
G 101 -23249 3070 HIGHLAND #11 -13 MO
3070 HIGHLAND -MOORE #11 -13 LEGAL
$434.00
SVCS JAN 2012
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -41600 -316 Legal P & I
PLANNING & INSPECTION LEGAL SVCS JAN
$156.00
2012
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
G 101 -23250 5001 WILSHIRE #12 -01 WIN
5001 WILSHIRENVINKLER LEGAL SVCS JAN
$51.00
2012
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
G 101 -23246 PBK SIGN VARIANCE #11 -1
PBK SIGN VARIANCE LEGAL SVCS JAN 2012
$51.00
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Cash Payment
G 101 -23251 XX MANCHESTER SUBDV
MANCHESTER SUBDV GULLICKSON LEGAL
$21.00
SVCS JAN 2012
Invoice 106743
2/10/2012
Transaction Date
3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,279.00
Refer 45 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA B200 4TH FLOOR COPIER-
$12.40
OVERAGE 2 -10 THRU 3 -9
Invoice 1372111
3/5/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -42400 -202 Duplicating and copying
KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER-
$12.40
OVERAGE 2 -10 THRU 3 -9
Invoice 1372111
3/5/2012
Transaction Date
3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$24.80
Refer 56
MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSON, L
Cash Payment
E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous
ARBITRATION & ADMINISTRATIVE
$61.50
HEAERINGS JAN 2012
Invoice 031312
2/1/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous
JAN 2012 LABOR RELATIONS SVCS
$334.35
Invoice 031312
2/1/2012
Transaction Date
3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$395.85
Refer 64 MER77, CRAIG M. LAW OFFICE _
Cash Payment
E 101 -41600 -304 Legal Fees
PROSECUTION SVCS FEBRUARY 2012
$7,657.25
Invoice 0000391
3/4/2012
Transaction Date
3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$7,657.25
Refer 33
MINNESOTA BOARD PEACE OFF/
"
-605-
i................
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
03/08/12 10:58 AM
Page 7
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2012 POST LICENSE RENEWALS, NICCUM, $540.00
RASMUSSEN, SCHOENHERR, SPENCER,
SUSSMAN & SZCZEPANIK $90 EACH
Invoice 031312 2/23/2012 PO 23847
Transaction Date 3/7/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $540.00
Refer 34 MNSPECT _
Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees PROPERTY MTCE INSPECTION SVC 5000 $60.00
SHORELINE DRIVE #5
Invoice 5722 3/1/2012
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -308 Building Inspection Fees FIRE INSPECTION SVC FEB 2012 $812.50
Invoice 5725 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 317/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $872.50
Refer 35 MNSPECT
Cash Payment
Invoice 5723
Cash Payment
E 101 -42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees FEB 2012 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES
3/1/2012
G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments FEB 2012 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION STATE
SURCHARGE FEE CREDIT
Invoice 5723 3/1/2012
Cash Payment R 101 - 42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee FEB 2012 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PERMIT
FEE CREDIT
Invoice 5723 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
$992.77
- $30.00
- $75.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $887.77
Refer 36 MOONEY, DEAN L. _
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -431 Meeting Expense
REIMBURSE MEALS D. MOONEY HENNP
$45.00
CTY CHIEF'S MTGS 1 -12 -12 THRU 3 -1 -12
Invoice 031312 3/2/2012
Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training
REIMBURSE REGISTRATION FEE D.
$325.00
MOONEY STATE POLICE CHIEFS
CONFERENCE April 23 -26 2012
Invoice 031312 3/2/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$370.00
Refer 37 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO _
Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib
MARCH 2012 FIRE RELIEF CONTRIBUTION
$11,968.75
Invoice 031312 3/7/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$11,968.75
Refer 49 NAPA AUTO PARTS - SPRING PAR
Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts
TURN SIGNAL SWITCH
$302.59
Invoice 800431 2/22/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$302.59
Refer 38 NEWMAN SIGNS _
Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials
400 SIGN RIVETS
$94.05
Invoice TI- 0245438 2/16/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$94.05
Refer 39 OFFICE DEPOT _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies LAMINATING POUCHES LIQUOR STORE $100.80
Invoice 599501167001 2/24/2012 PO 25569
Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -200 Office Supplies CANON B/W & COLOR INK CARTRIDGES $37.93
Invoice 598695242001 2/17/2012 PO 22782
-606-
CITY OF MOUND 03/08/12 10:58 AM
\
Page 8
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Current Period: March 2012
Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -200 Office Supplies
STAPLER
$11.28
Invoice 598695242001 2/17/2012 PO 22782
Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -200 Office Supplies
WOOD FRAMES
$12.49
Invoice 598695242001 2/17/2012 PO 22782
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -200 Office Supplies
SERPENTINE CERTIFICATES
$2.80
Invoice 598695242002 2/28/2012 PO 22782
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$165.30
Refer 42 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic
PEST CONTROL SVC 2 -10 -12
$50.20
Invoice
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$50.20
Refer 41 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEM _
Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -434 Conference & Training
SPRING TRAINING APRIL 11 & 12- S.HAWKS,
$50.00
V. WEBER
Invoice 031312 317/2012 PO 23850
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$50.00
Refer 43 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY _
Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions
FIRST HALF MEMBERSHIP ASSESSMENT
$400.00
$400NOTE
Invoice 031312 317/2012
Transaction Date 317/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$400.00
Refer 44 SUN PATRIOIT NEWSPAPER _
Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing
ZONING ORDINANCE PUBLIC HEARING
$22.05
LEGAL PUBLICATION 3 -3 -12
Invoice 1094620 3/3/2012
Transaction Date 3/7/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$22.05
Refer 47 SUN PATRIOIT NEWSPAPER _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising
CUSTOMER APPREC. WINE SALE AD 2 -18 -12
$275.19
Invoice 1088348 2/18/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising
CUSTOMER APPREC. WINE SALE AD 2 -25 -12
$566.91
Invoice 1088347 2/25/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$842.10
Refer 55 SWARTZER, BRIAN _
Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms
2012 BOOT ALLOWANCE- B SWARTZER
$150.00
Invoice 031312 3/8/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$150.00
Refer 48 THYSSEN -KRUPP ELEVATOR COR _
Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HALL 3 -1
$731.87
THRU 5 -31 -12
Invoice 185952 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$731.87
Refer 46 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) _
Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS
$2.95
Invoice 091087 2/4/2012
Cash Payment E 22242260 -210 Operating Supplies
BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS, DRILL BIT
$13.87
Invoice 091086 2/4/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells F -607- 10100 Total
$16.82
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
Refer 50 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
03/08/12 10:58 AM
Page 9
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
COUPLING, BALL VALVE
$15.48
Invoice 091256
2/13/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts
MIXER, HOSE, MENDER, CONNECTOR
$35.77
Invoice 091258
2/13/2012
Project 12 -3
$1,481.25
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
BLDG WIRE, DPLX 1/2 RISE COVER
$5.46
Invoice 091265
2/13/2012
Project 12 -3
Invoice 0044097
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
VERT SNAP COVER
$6.40
Invoice 091268
2/13/2012
Project 12 -3
Refer 54 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INCOR _
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials
BLDG WIRE, OUTLET, DPLX 1/2 RISE COVER
$11.36
Invoice 091270
2/13/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment
E 601 - 49400 -224 Street Maint Materials
WALL PLATE, TOGGLE SWITCH
$14.72
Invoice 091307
2/15/2012
Transaction Date
3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$89.19
Refer 51
TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) _
Cash Payment
E 601 -49400 -210 Operating Supplies
4 PK DBL LIFE BULBS
$3.84
Invoice 091313
2/15/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply
BLADES, NUTS, BOLTS
$38.44
Invoice 091476
2/23/2012
Cash Payment
E 101 -45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply
EXTENSION CORD
$14.95
Invoice 091533
2/27/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies
PAINTERS TAPE, MEDALLION TRM TNBSGL
$91.87
Invoice 091539
2/27/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies
DISH SOAP, MEDALLION W/TRM PSBSGL
$75.86
Invoice 091531
2/27/2012
Project 12 -3
Cash Payment
E 601 -49400 -220 Repair/Maint Supply
SAFETY GLASSES, LATCH STORAGE BOX
$13.34
Invoice 091561
2/28/2012
Cash Payment
E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials
PLUG, BRUSH, 4 -WIRE ROLLER FRAME
$18.77
Invoice 091558\
2/28/2012
Project 12 -3
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$257.07
Refer 52 US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSO
Cash Payment E 355 -47000 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees
Invoice 3067549 2/24/2012
2003 TIF BONDS ADMIN FEE 2 -1 -12 THRU 1- $431.25
31 -13
Cash Payment
E 396 -47000 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees
2002 PS BLDG LEASE REVENUE BONDS
$1,050.00
ADMIN FEE 2 -1 -12 THRU 7 -31 -12
Invoice 3066899
2/24/2012
Transaction Date
318/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,481.25
Refer 53 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT _
Cash Payment
E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies
AIR MOTOR REPAIR KIT FOR 203 -8
$110.27
Invoice 0044097
2/16/2012
Project 12 -3
Transaction Date
3/8/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$110.27
Refer 54 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INCOR _
Cash Payment
E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts
CONVOLUTED WAFER BROOMS, BROOM
$2,851.43
REFILL SETS, HEAVY DUTY GUTTER
BROOMS
Invoice 0137577 2/21/2012 PO 23666
Transaction Date 3/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,851.43
-608-
1.
CITY OF MOUND
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
355 2003 -C G.O. TIF 1 -2
396 2002 -HRA Lease Revenue Bonds
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
670 RECYCLING FUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
10100 Wells Fargo
$31,296.26
$14,570.40
$460.38
$431.25
$1,050.00
$530.12
$2,889.48
$1,668.43
$14,280.21
$67,176.53
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $67,176.53
Total $67,176.53
.1•
03/08/12 10:58 AM
Page 10
CITY OF MOUND
Batch Name 03132012HWS
Payments
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
User Dollar Amt
Computer Dollar Amt
$75,867.83
$75,867.83
$0.00 In Balance
03/08/12 11:04 AM
Page 1
Refer 1 BELLBOY CORPORATION _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE, CORKSCREWS, WINE $241.30
GLASSES, FILBERTS
Invoice 86444800 3/2/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCHANDISE, CORKSCREW, FLASK
$11.00
Invoice 86417900 2/24/2012
WINE
$274.00
Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
BAGS
$21.35
Invoice 86417900 2/24/2012
FREIGHT
$9.30
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$273.65
Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _
WINE
$278.00
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$282.00
Invoice 71526600 2/24/2012
FREIGHT
$9.30
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$9.30
Invoice 71526600 2/24/2012
WINE
$270.00
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$278.00
Invoice 71526500 2/24/2012
FREIGHT
$9.30
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$9.30
Invoice 71526500 2/24/2012
LIQUOR
$891.10
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$385.50
Invoice 72304300 2/24/2012
LIQUOR
$2,218.70
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$3.10
Invoice 72304300 2/24/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $967.20
Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$274.00
Invoice 71623000 2/24/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$9.30
Invoice 71623000 2/24/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$278.00
Invoice 71623100 2/24/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$9.30
Invoice 71623100 2/24/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$270.00
Invoice 71623200 2/24/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$9.30
Invoice 71623200 2/24/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$891.10
Invoice 72318700 2/27/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,218.70
Invoice 72394000 3/2/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$27.90
Invoice 72394000 3/2/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,987.60
Refer 57 BELLBOY CORPORATION
-610-
_f ..... _ ........ ___
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 72409500 3/5/2012
03108/12 11:04 AM
Page 2
$2,999.80
Transaction Date 3/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,999.80
Refer 4 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _
Cash Payment E 60949750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $16.40
Invoice 45454 2/29/2012
Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $530.80
Invoice 45455 2/29/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $547.20
Refer 6 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS $176.20
Invoice 0108059308 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $176.20
Refer
7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$335.01
Invoice 2828 3/1/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$254.00
Invoice 1015230 2/27/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$589.01
Refer 8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$971.77
Invoice 640112 3/2/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,924.55
Invoice 640111 2/28/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$3,896.32
Refer 58 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,389.60
Invoice 641008 3/6/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$1,389.60
Refer 59 EXTREME BEVERAGE _
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa REDBULL PRODUCTS MIX
$137.50
Invoice W- 510686 3/7/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$137.50
Refer 9 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$304.00
Invoice 136748 2/23/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.50
Invoice 136748 2/23/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$308.50
Refer 60 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$126.00
Invoice 592087 3/6/2012
Transaction Date 3/8/2012
Wells Fargo
10100
Total
$126.00
Refer _ 10 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 1714738 2/28/2012 -611-
$336.00
....
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
03/08/12 11:04 AM
Page 3
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,533.30
Invoice 1714729
2/28/2012
2/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$15.50
Invoice 1714730
2/28/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$113.00
Invoice 1714721
2/24/2012
Total $4,709.51
$424.00
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$112.00
Invoice 1714757
3/2/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,109.80
Rofor Fit JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment
Invoice 1714769
Cash Payment
Invoice 1714768
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
3/6/2012
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
3/6/2012
$38.80
$2,947.84
Transaction Date 3/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,986.64
Refer 11 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _
WINE
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$1,433.73
Invoice 1239582
2/22/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE
$3,241.53
Invoice 1239583
2/22/2012
ADVERTISING 4 COLOR 3 X 7" AD
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX
$34.25
Invoice 1239584
2/22/2012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100
Total $4,709.51
Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,102.48
Invoice 1244448 2/29/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$2,801.69
Invoice 1244449 2/29/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,904.17
Refer 13 LAKESHORE WEEKLY COMMUNIC
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising
ADVERTISING 4 COLOR 3 X 7" AD
$424.00
LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS PG 3A
Invoice 00128631 2/21/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising
ADVERTISING 4 COLOR 3 X T' AD
$424.00
LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS PG 3A
Invoice 00128677 2/28/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$848.00
Refer 14 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY
_
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 2 -16 -12
$256.20
Invoice 26481 2/16/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 2 -20 -12
$35.00
Invoice 26490 2120/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 2 -23 -12
$247.80
Invoice 26759 2/23/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
DELIVERY SVC 2 -27 -12
$8.40
Invoice 26769 2/27/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$547.40
-612
Refer 5 MINNESOTA PUBLISHING
_
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
03/08112 11:04 AM
Page 4
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising ADVERTISING 1/2 PG AD March 12 ISSUE $243.00
WEST LAKE BUSINESS PUBLICATION
Invoice 14075 3/1/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $243.00
Refer 15 MUZAK- MINNEAPOLIS
Cash Payment
Invoice A873112
Transaction Date
E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MUSIC SERVICE MARCH 2012 HWS
3/1/2012
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 62 OLVALDE FARM & BREWING CO. _
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER
Invoice 337 3/5/2012
$108.94
Total $108.94
$84.00
Transaction Date 3/8/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84.00
Refer 16 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,054.76
Invoice 8339875
2/27/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$15.00
Invoice 8339875
2/27/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$755.33
Invoice 8340644
3/5/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$12.50
Invoice 8340644
315/2012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,837.59
Refer 17 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$485.59
Invoice 2203890
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$921.40
Invoice 2203891
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$164.75
Invoice 2203892
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$694.25
Invoice 2200570
2/22/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$268.85
Invoice 1
2/2212012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $2,534.84
Refer 18 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS
_
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$32.00
Invoice 580417
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,355.87
Invoice 580415
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,807.33
Invoice 580416
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,790.17
Invoice 577536
2/22/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,354.07
Invoice 577537
2/22/2012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $7,339.44
Refer 19 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC _ -613-
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 2 -28 -12
Invoice 891727 2/21/2012
03/08/12 11:04 AM
Page 5
$15.00
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00
Refer 20 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$352.00
Invoice 1742667
3/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$476.82
Invoice 1717350
3/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$574.35
Invoice 1704530
3/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$3.45
Invoice 1704530
3/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$475.17
Invoice 1717328
2/24/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.34
Invoice 1717328
2/24/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$486.00
Invoice 1701919
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.60
Invoice 1701919
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$6.90
Invoice 1742667
3/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.49
Invoice 1717350
3/2/2012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $2,383.12
Refer 21
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
_
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$129.90
Invoice 677588
2/28/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,663.60
Invoice 677590
2/28/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$226.00
Invoice 00772338 2/24/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$450.00
Invoice 00772394 3/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$7,780.45
Invoice 678482
3/6/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX -WATER
$18.00
Invoice 678478
3/6/2012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $10,267.95
Refer 23 VINIFERA MINNESOTA
Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 323638 3/2/2012
$278.00
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $278.00
Refer 22 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _
Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
Invoice 0052570 2/23/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 0052570 2/23/2012
WINE $672.00
FREIGHT $16.00
-614-
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
03/08/12 11:04 AM
Page 6
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $480.00
Invoice 0052904 2/29/2012
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $16.00
Invoice 0052904 2/29/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,184.00
Refer 24 WINE COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$656.00
Invoice 293469
3/1/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$11.55
Invoice 293469
3/1/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$128.00
Invoice 293721
3/2/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$476.00
Invoice 292915
2/23/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$8.25
Invoice 292915
2/23/2012
-615-
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R
MERCHANDISE, GLASSES, FLUTES
$233.00
Invoice 293470
3/1/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
FREIGHT
$3.30
Invoice 293470
3/1/2012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,516.10
Refer 25 WINE MERCHANTS _
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,672.50
Invoice 398329
2/22/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa WATER
$21.00
Invoice 398330
2/22/2012
Cash Payment
E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,320.00
Invoice 399310
2/2912012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,013.50
Refer 26
WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,544.18
Invoice 866416
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT PER STMT
- $38.50
Invoice 121
2/28/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,597.90
Invoice 869097 3/7/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,103.58
Refer 27 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,207.14
Invoice 710767
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,151.96
Invoice 710769
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$55.95
Invoice 710768
2/29/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
- $32.88
Invoice 854625
2/21/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$845.90
Invoice 707492
2/23/2012
-615-
CITY OF MOUND
CITY OF MOUND
Payments
Current Period: March 2012
03/08/12 11:04 AM
Page 7
Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,463.00
Invoice 707493 2/23/2012
Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$127.90
Invoice 855305 2/29/2012
Transaction Date 3/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,563.17
Refer 28 Z WINES USA LLC _
C h P nt E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $872.00
as ayme
Invoice 10889
2/23/2012
Cash Payment
E 609 -49750 -265 Freight
Invoice 10889
2/23/2012
Transaction Date
3/6/2012
FREIGHT
Wells Fargo 10100
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $75,867.83
$75,867.83
Pre - Written Check $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $75,867.83
Total $75,867.83
-616-
$19.50
Total $891.50
• = BU L_'T'ON 8L M r-= N K
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
" 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 - Chaska, MN 55318 -1172
Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805
www.bolton- menk.com
March 8, 2012
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvements
City Project Nos. PW- 12 -01, PW- 12 -02, PW- 12 -03, PW -12 -04
Final Plans and Specifications
Dear Mayor and City Council Members:
1 NC®
The 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement project plans and specifications
have been completed and we are requesting approval of these plans. There have been some revisions to
the project as presented at the public improvement hearing held on November 8, 2011.
At the Council meeting of January 24'h approval was given to remove /replace the storm sewer at 2259
Langdon Lane. At the February 28th Council meeting, the following revisions were approved: removal of
the proposed watermain on Cambridge Lane, from Manchester Road to Brighton Boulevard, and removal
of the Kildare Lane cul -de -sac west of Kerry Lane. The addition of some new sections of watermain was
also discussed, but there was a question of the cost.
The cost of the proposed additional sections has been estimated and it is less than the deleted portion on
Cambridge Lane. Therefore, the plans now include five new sections of watermain: Brighton Boulevard
from Manchester Road to Leslie Road; Brighton Boulevard from Afton Road to Monmouth Road;
Bradford Lane cul -de -sac to Bradford Lane; Clare Lane cul -de -sac loop to Cavan Road; Kerry Lane from
Carlow Road to Kildare Road.
In addition, the project also now includes the removal and replacement of the Carlow Road Lift Station,
LS Kl. During discussion at the public improvement hearing this was mentioned as a possibility.
Subsequently, when the Council received the Engineering Report for the lift station replacement at the
January 24th meeting, the Council directed this improvement be included with the 2012 Street project.
We are requesting adoption of the attached resolution approving final plans and specifications for the
2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement project and authorizing advertisement
for bids to be received on April 17, 2012. We anticipate requesting award of bid at the following Council
meeting on April 24, 2012.
Sincerely,
BOLTON & MENK, INC.
oa� Z_ -- �_
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
H: DocumenttMound/C12103970 /Correspondence
DESIGNING FOQ e BETTER TOMORROW
Bolton & Menk is Q1,Z':'tl opportunity employer
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2012 STREET, UTILITY, LIFT STATION AND
RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT;
CITY PROJECT NO.S PW- 12 -01, PW- 12 -02, PW- 12 -03, PW -12 -04
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution passed by the City Council on November 8, 2011, and
amended on February 28, 2012, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the
following proposed improvement projects: 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall
Improvement Project;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota:
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof,
are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement
for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published in the official city newspaper, shall
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the City Clerk until
10:00 a.m. on April 17, 2012, at which time they will be publicly opened in the council
chambers of city hall by the City Clerk and Engineer, will then be tabulated and will be
considered by the City Council at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 2011, in the council
chambers. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will
be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit,
cashier's check, bid bond or certified check payable to the clerk for 5% of the amount of
such bid.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of March, 2011.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Page 1 of 2 511
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit t
Application fee - - --
if application po s migirked or received:
less than 30 days
ore than 30 days
An exempt permit may be issued to a nonprofit organization that:
- conducts lawful gambling on five or fewer days, and
before the event
before the event
- awards less than $50,000 in prizes during a calendar year,
$100
$SO
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION Check# $
Organization name
Previous gambling permit number
((Q
Minnesota tax ID numbe , if any
Federal employer lb number, if any
Type of nonprofit organization. Check one.
Fraternal Religious Veterans Other nonprofit organization
Mailing address City State Zip Code County
hires - a �.n tw �s�A
Name of chief executive officer (CEO) Daytime phone number Email address
lwtw, __At�CM - =� I fV r
Attach a copy ofQ of the following for proof of nonprofit status.
Do not attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number as they are not proof of nonprofit status.
Ellionprofit Articles of Incorporation OR a current Certificate of Goad Standing .
Don't have a copy? This certificate must be obtained each year from:
Secretary of State, Business Services Div., 180 State Office Building, St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 651- 296-2803
4IRS income tax exemption [501(c)] letter in your organization's name.
Don't have a copy? To obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter, have an organization officer
contact the IRS at 877- 829 -5500.
IRS - Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter)
If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following:
a, IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling, and
b, the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate.
GAMBLING PREMISES INFORMATIO14
Name of premises where the gambling event will be conducted. For raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place,
muunA -Tiff, "` �
Address (do not use PO boxljl City or township Zip Code County
4 4V.6 Jyf, t kv& - - - -- mounck 5`
Date(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date f the drawnrig)
Y!
Check t6 box or oxes that ' aicate the ty e of gambling activity your organization will conduct:
Ingo* afffes Paddler,,heels" Pull -Tabs, Tipboards*
Gambling equipment for Null -tabs, bingo paper, tipboards, and
pa, ddlevheels must be obtained from a distributor licensed Ly the
Gambling Control Board. EYCEHTIC,I : Bingo= hard cards and
bingo number selection devices may be borrowed from another
organization authorized to conduct bingo.
To find a licensed distributor, go to v. wv%,.gcb.state.mn.us and click
on List of Licensed Distributors, or call. 551- 539 -4000.
-619-
(Uv ,,
LG220 Application for Exempt Permit
Page 2 of 2 5/11
LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
If the gambling premises is within city limits,
If the gambling premises is located in a township, a
a city official must check the action that the city is
county official must check the action that the county is
taking on this application and sign the application.
taking on this application and sign the application.
A township official is not required to sign the
application.
application is acknowledged with no waiting
The application is acknowledged with no waiting
_The
period.
period.
_The application is acknowledged with a 30 day
The application is acknowledged with a 30 day
waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a
waiting period, and allows the Board to issue a
permit after 30 days.
permit after 30 days (60 days for a 1st class city).
The application is denied.
_The application is denied.
Print county name
Print city name
On behalf of the county;, I acknowledge this application.
Signature of county personnel receiving application
On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application.
Signature of city personnel receiving application
Title Date_
(Optional) TOWNSHIP., On behalf of the township, I
acknowledge that the organization is applying for exempted
Title Date
_
gambling activity within the township limits. [A township has no
statutory authority to approve or deny an application (Minnesota
Statute 349.166)]
Print township name _
Signature of township official acknowledging application
Title Date
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S SIGNATURE
The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I acknowledge
that the financial report will be com leted and retumed
the Board within 30 days of the date of our gambling
activity.
' /d L4 I +
Chief executive officer's signature
Date (�L — F- 11--1'-�/1�
Complete a separate application for each gXubling event:
Financial report and recordkeeping
• one day of gambling activity
required
• two or more consecutive days of gambling activity
A financial report form and instructions will
• each day a raffle drawing is held
be sent with your permit, or use the online
fill -in form available at
Send application with:
www.gcb.state.mn.us. Within 30 days of the
• a copy of your proof of nonprofit status, and
activity date, complete and return the
• application fee for each event
financial report form to the Gambling
Make check payable to "State of Minnesota."
Control Board.
Questions?
To: Gambling Control Board
Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling
17441 West County load B, Suite 300 South
Control Board at 65x. - 639 - 4000.
Roseville, MN 55113
This form will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request.
Data privacy notice: The information
requested on this form (and any
attachments) will be used by the Gambling
Control Board (Board) to determine your
organization's qualifications to be involved
in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota.
Your organization has the right to refuse to
supply the information; however, if your
organization refuses to supply this
information, the Board may not be able to
determine your organizations qualifications
and, as a consequence, may refuse to issue
a permit. If your organization supplies the
information requested, the Board will be
able to process your organization's
application.
Your organization's name and
address will be public information
when received by the Board. All
other information provided will be
private data about your
organization until the Board
issues the permit. When the
Board issues the permit, all
information provided will become
public. If the Board does not
issue a permit, all information
provided remains private, with the
exception of your organization's
name and ac:620_vhich will
remain public.
Private data about your organization are available
to: Board members, Board staff whose work
requires access to the information; Minnesota's
Department of Public Safety; Attorney General;
Commissioners of Administration, Minnesota
Management & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative
Auditor, national and international gambling
regulatory agencies; anyone pursuant to court
order; other individuals and agencies specifically
authorized by state or federal law to have access
to the information; individuals and agencies for
which law or legal order authorizes a new use or
sharing of information after this notice was given;
and anyone with your written consent.
Reset Form
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 12 -25
RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING BRUCE MILLER FOR HIS CONTRIBUTION
TO THE MOUND CENTENNIAL
WHEREAS, the City of Mound is celebrating its Centennial in 2012, and
WHEREAS, Bruce Miller, local award - winning artist, agreed to create and donate an original oil
on canvas painting that is to become the official image and symbol of the Mound Centennial,
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Miller met several times with members of the Mound Centennial Committee to
design a unique concept appropriate to the Mound Centennial, and
WHEREAS, this original oil painting commemorating Mound's Centennial has been donated to
the City of Mound to be displayed at City Hall for the enjoyment of visitors and residents, and
WHEREAS, Bruce Miller is allowing posters and tee -shirts with this image to be made and sold
by the Centennial Committee with proceeds to be used to help defray the costs of the
celebration,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to
recognize and extend our sincere appreciation to artist Bruce Miller for his generosity in
donating his time and talent to the Mound Centennial by creating a painting depicting both
historic and modern features of our City.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of March, 2012.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-621-
Mayor Mark Hanus
CITY OF MOUND , a p a U' s�
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD 1
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PUBLIC DANCE/LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION
EVENT: Our Lady of the Lake School's "Blast"
LOCATION OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: Our Ladv of the Lake Church & School Parking Lot
TYPE OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC:
TIME PERIOD OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC 6 PM to Midnight
(HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am — Sunday: 8pm- 11:30pm)
CHAIRPERSON OR
APPLICANT: Rhonda M. Eurich TITLE: Administrator
ADDRESS: Our Lady of the Lake Church ADDRESS: 2385 Commerce Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
HOME PHONE #:612-269-4617 Cell HOME PHONE #:
WORK PHONE #:952-472-1284 X161 WO PHONE #:
2/21/12 -- pj'.O�" . 4c_'
Date App cant's Signature
-622-
E,All
MG:2
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY'
Name of organization
Minnesota Department of Public Safety
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
444 Cedar Street, Suite 222, St. Paul, MN 55101
651 - 201 -7500 Fax 651 - 297 -5259 TTY 651- 282 -6555
APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A 1 DAY
TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
Our Lady of the Lake Church "The BLAST"
Address
12385 Commerce Blvd.
Name of person makina aDDlication
a M. Eurich, Administrator
Date organized Tax exempt number
Jan 1, 1909 ___7 [29286
City State Zip Code
IMound Minnesota 1155364
Business phone Home phone
1952-472-1284 X161 1 612 - 269 -4617 cell
Date set ups will be sold Type of organization
Liquor will be sold May 19, 2012 1:1 Club F1 Charitable ® Religious ® Other non - profit
Organization officer's name City State Zip
�( Fr. Tim Dolan, Pastor Mound Minnesota 1 55364
Add,IVew Officer
Location where permit will be used. If an outdoor area, describe.
Parking lot behind Our Lady of the Lake Church and Our Lady of the Lake School. Address is 2385 Commerce Blvd. in Moun4 MN.
If the applicant will contract for intoxicating liquor service give the name and address of the liquor license providing the service.
John Glenn of MillerCoors / On Premise Sales Manager
3639 Reed Rd. St. Bonifacius, MN 55375
If the applicant will carry liquor liability insurance please provide the carrier's name and amount of coverage.
Self- insured thru the Archdiocese of St. Paul & Mpls.. Program administered by Catholic Mutual.
We have $500,000 GL and $500,000 XL
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
M 0 LtXA
cityNewwr, Date Approved
City Fee Amount Permit Date
Date Fee Paid
Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address
above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the
permit for the event.
-623- Page 1 of 1
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sarah Smith
DATE: March 7,2012'
APPLICANT: T. Rob Winkler
REQUEST: Variances
CASE NUMBER: 12 -01
LOCATION: 5001 Wilshire Boulevard
ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
SUMMARY. The applicant, T. Rob Winkler, has submitted an application for a variance to install
a new six (6) foot wood privacy fence along the east property line at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard
which abuts the City's beach on Brighton Commons and includes a winter access road. A fence
previously was located in the subject area but was removed in 2009 as part of a new house
construction project. The majority of the proposed fence conforms to the current regulations
with the exception of the portion that is located ahead of the 30 -foot front setback and the
portion that is located within the 50 FT lakeshore setback. Based on the submitted materials
from the applicant, the proposed 6 FT fence would be located on the east side property line
and would start approximately 24 FT from the NE property iron and extend south beyond the
rear building line towards the lake. Details regarding the request are contained in the Planning
Report and the application materials submitted by the applicant which have been included as
attachments.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OVERVIEW. Staff explained the request and noted that a
correction to the Planning Report. Since a portion of the proposed 6 -foot fence is located
within 30 -foot front setback, variance approval is needed for this segment in addition to the
portion of the fence located in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback. Per code, fences in the front yard
are limited to no more than 4 feet and fences in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback are limited to 3 FT
and include a provision for transparency similar to that of a chain link fence. Staff
recommendation is for approval of the request to allow installation of the 6 FT fence which
includes both the front and lakeshore setback segments. Discussion took place that there was
a fence previously on the property and the need for the fence due to the beach /lake access
located immediately adjacent to the applicant's property.
-624-
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. Discussion took place about whether the fence
segment in the front setback could be modified to conform with the code and whether
landscaping such as arborvitaes could be used. The applicant commented that the former
fence was 6 FT and that arborvitaes will not prevent intrusions into his yard by the park /lake
users. A neighbor, Colonel John Sobraski, 5009 Wilshire Boulevard, attended the meeting and
commented that he has had to tell people to leave Mr. Winkler's property.
Based on its review, members of the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the
variances for the proposed 6 -FT fence with the exception of Commissioner Linkert who was
opposed. A draft resolution has been prepared for review and consideration by the City
Council.
-625-
RESOLUTION # 12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND
APPROVING VARIANCES FOR PROPERTY AT 5001 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
P & Z CASE # 12-01
WHEREAS, the applicant, T. Rob Winkler, has submitted a variance request to
construct a 6 foot privacy fence along the east side lot line to replace a former fence that
existed on the property but was removed as part of the demolition and new house
construction project at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the property is located at the intersection of Wilshire and Brighton
Boulevards. The property was originally platted as part of Block 40 of the Wychwood
Subdivision. The Zoning is R -1, Single Family Residential; and
WHEREAS, the property directly abuts the City's beach on Brighton Commons which
also includes a winter access road; and
WHEREAS, the majority of the proposed fence conforms to the current regulations with
the exception of the portion that is located ahead 30 -foot front setback and the portion
that is located within the 50 FT lakeshore setback; and
WHEREAS, fence height is limited to no more than 4 feet if located in the 30 -foot front
setback; and
WHEREAS, fence height is limited to 3 feet in the 50 -foot lakeshore setback area and
must include transparency similar to that of a chain link fence; and
WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) contains the criteria for granting variances in
the City of Mound; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its February 21, 2012 meeting, reviewed the
variance application materials, the Planning Report and all related supporting
information and voted seven in favor, one opposed, to recommended approval of the
variances for the fence.
-626-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Mound does
hereby approve variances to allow installation of a 6 foot privacy fence at 5001 Wilshire
Boulevard, as proposed by the applicant, subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the
variance request.
2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included
as part of this action.
3. Applicant shall be required to submit a building permit for the fence including all
required information.
4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency
permits.
5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin
County unless the City, at its option, records the resolution with associated fees
to be paid out of the escrow. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not
be released for recording until any and /or all conditions have been met.
6. No building permits will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution
has been provided to the City unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on
file or submitted with the City of Mound or the City files the resolution to be paid
out of the escrow.
7. This variance(s) is approved for the following legally described property:
All that pan` of Block 40, Wychwood, according to the record plat thereof on rile
and of record in the office of the Registrar of titles in and for Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at
the Southeasterly corner said Block 40, thence Northwesterly along the Easterly
line of said Block 40 a distance of 55 feet to the point of beginning of the line to
be described, thence deflecting to the left 103 degrees 11 minutes 42 seconds
for a distance of 103 feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Minnetonka and
there terminating.
As part of its approval of the variance request, the City Council hereby makes the
following findings of fact based on the record:
1. A fence formerly existed on the subject property which buffered the property from
the adjacent public beach and lake use.
2. The fence will help afford the property owner enjoyment of the property as it is
located next to Brighton Commons which includes a public beach and access
road.
3. The majority of the proposed fence conforms to the current regulations with the
exception of the portion that is located in front of the 30 -foot front setback and the
portion that is located within the 50 -foot lakeshore setback.
-627-
4. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are met.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of March 2012.
Attest: City Clerk
Mark Hanus, Mayor
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas
Gawtry (7:07), David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Pete Wiechert, and
Councilmember Ray Salazar. Absent: Kelvin Retterath. Staff present: Community
Development Director Sarah Smith.
Others present: Bryan Pellowski, 6133 Blue Circle Drive, # 150, Minnetonka; Sue Cross,
6133 Blue Circle Drive, # 150, Minnetonka; Rob Winkler, 5001 Wilshire Boulevard; John
Sobraski, 5009 Wilshire Boulevard; Jen Berrett
BOARD OF APPEALS
Case No. 12 -01 Fence Variance
5001 Wilshire Boulevard Applicant: T. Rob Winkler
Smith introduced the case, pointing out various features of the parcel. She also walked
through the fence requirements as outlined in the code and provided several photos
showing the previous 6 foot privacy fence on the property that was removed at the time
cabin was demolished in 2009 or early 2010. Because the nonconforming fence was not
reconstructed within 1 year of removal per code, the new fence is required to conform
to the current code. The areas in the 30 -foot front setback and in the 50 -foot lake
setback require a variance. Staff noted that the need for the variance for the 6 foot
fence in the front setback area is a correction from the Planning Report. Staff supports
replacement of the lakeside as well as the street side fence as designed.
Salazar discussed the requirements of variances as outlined in Section 129 of the City
Code. He felt there would be alternatives to a fence, such as planting trees.
Goode stated that he owns property adjacent to a commons that is a major entry /exit
point for snowmobilers, four wheelers, ice fisherman and others. There is a riparian
zone adjacent to his property as well as an elevation difference, both of which help. He
has sympathy for their experiences.
Bergquist commented that he drives by this property every day. He doesn't see any
issue for the front side because the fence is basically covering up the front side of the
house, however, on the back the people are intruding into the backyard. He doesn't see
a problem with either variance.
-629-
Mr. Winkler confirmed that the original fence was 6 feet. Smith restated that the new
fence couldn't be grandfathered in because the 1 year provision for nonconformities has
expired.
Penner asked if there was a difference between the removal by vandals and removal by
the property owner. Smith said the 1 year provision applies.
Rob Winkler (5001 Wilshire Blvd) said first, he's trying to recreate what was there and
he didn't know about the 1 year provision. The lot isn't large and in order to build the
house the fence had to go. He related a couple of stories to illustrate the intrusion.
Salazar reiterated his suggestion about planting arborvitaes. Winkler indicated that
arborvitaes will not stop the intrusion and require maintenance to keep them trimmed.
Salazar asked if the front fence couldn't be built conforming. Winkler indicated he
would like to continue with the request for the 6 foot fence.
Colonel Sobraski (5009 Wilshire Blvd) commented that he has requested people stay off
of Mr. Winkler's dock before the new house was built and that people bring their dogs
and use the lawn.
Linkert thought that when someone builds a house on a small lot modifications need to
be made to fit within the rules. The one variance might be the best way to move
forward.
Bergquist stated that the new house is definitely an improvement to what was there.
He's in favor of both variances.
Salazar thinks that Council might be concerned it would be precedent setting. However,
the variance meets all 4 criteria and the fact that it abuts a common area is unique. He
thinks the one hang -up may be the 2 variances.
MOTION by Bergquist, second by Gawtry, to approve the variances. MOTION carried.
Linkert opposed.
In voting for denial, Linkert offered the following findings:
He believes that the conditions, specifically expiration of the 1 year provision, were
created by the property owner and the requested lakeside fence variance is enough.
Salazar commented that the applicant indicated that there extenuating circumstances
that precluded completion of the project. He believes that the applicant would have
worked within the code had he known about the 1 year deadline.
-630-
December 29, 2011
To: Mound Planning Commission
Mound City Council
Re: Construction of Privacy Fence Between,001 Wilshire and the Mound Swimming Area
First, I am utterly surprised that replacing a fence that was destroyed by teenagers out of control is even
a question in anyones mind.
Second, the owner of the property decided not to file charges against the teenagers who were in custody
at the beach. The owners charity was not returned by the parents of the vandalizing teenagers. The
parents made no effort to replace the fence.
The father of the present owner developed the entire area 2001 -2025 and deeded the land to the city for
the swimming area. A little quid pro quo would seem to be in order.
The fence will also provide a degree of privacy to the other owners of the adjacent properties. We will
not have to watch some teenage girl take off her bra and wave it over her head to attract some teenage
boys into the water. We won't have to watch some young boy mooning the other bathers. Nor will we
have to watch an adult female and male swimming nude in an embrace. Neither will I have to listen to
some kids using the beach after hours. The above has all takegplace since Mound felt the value and cost
of keeping a lifeguard was not "cost effective ".
In most cases I did not call the police. They have a tough enough job without responding to the above. I
know well what the police have to deal with. I had many M.P.'s under my post command at Fort Riley.
CFS: _
1) Owners 001, X017, ,Q21, 025
2) Files
Respectful
John E. Sobraske
Colonel, USA, Retired
-631-
T
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 4720604
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith
DATE: February 13, 2012
MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012
APPLICANT: T. Rob Winkler
REQUEST: Variance
CASE NUMBER: 12 -01
LOCATION: 5001 Wilshire Boulevard
ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
SUMMARY. The applicant, T. Rob Winkler, has submitted an application for a variance to install
a new six (6) foot wood privacy fence along the east property line at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard
which abuts the City's beach on Brighton Commons and includes a winter access road. A fence
previously was located in the subject area but was removed in 2009 as part of a new house
construction project. The majority of the proposed fence conforms with the current
regulations with the exception of the portion behind the rear building line that is located within
the 50 FT lakeshore setback.
BACKGROUND / DISCUSSION.
Staff deemed the use of the submitted survey acceptable for land use review as the
proposed location for the fence is on the east property line which is shown. Applicant is
advised that the Planning Commission reserves the right to require the submittal of
additional information, as necessary including but not limited to the submittal of an
updated survey and /or other related information.
The property was originally platted as part of Block 40 of the Wychwood Subdivision.
Review of the plat shows that the right -of -way to the north of the property includes
both Wilshire Boulevard and the access road. To the east of the property, Brighton
Boulevard is actually constructed on Brighton Commons rather than on dedicated right -
of -way.
-632-
• Wilshire Boulevard is the front yard as it is the only portion of the property adjacent to a
public street. The portion of the property adjacent Brighton Commons is a side yard as it
is not a street. Subject site is not a corner lot because it is not adjacent to a street.
• In 2008, Resolution No. 08 -57 (attached) was approved which granted variance approval
to allow the construction of a new house to replace a former house.
• As part of the house removal /new home construction project, a fence of similar design
was located on the property but was removed in 2009 and therefore outside of the 1-
year allowance for nonconformities as provided City Subsection 129 -35 (3).
• The City's fence regulations are contained in City Code Code Subsection 129 -203. The
applicable fence provisions related to the height /location /type for the proposal are
summarized below:
Fences in the 30 foot front setback are limited to no more than 4 FT.
Maximum height of 6 feet is allowed inside yards behind the front building
setback and in front of the required rear building setback; 6 FT fences are also
allowed behind the rear building line.
Fences in the 50 foot Lakeshore setback shall not exceed three 3 FT and shall
remain a see - through visibility level equal to that of a chain link type fence. All
fence materials must be treated so as to blend with the natural surroundings of
the setback area
• The finished side of the proposed fence will face Brighton Commons /Beach which is
consistent with the code requirements.
• Staff has received letters from neighboring property owners expressing support of the
fence variance which have been included as attachments.
• A fence (building) permit is required for the proposed fence and was submitted along
with the variance application.
• The variance application was deemed to be complete on February 9, 2012. MS 15.99
requires applications to be approved or denied within 60 days unless an extension is
executed by the City. Additional extensions beyond the 60 -day "City extension" must be
provided by the applicant.
STAFF /CONSULTANT / AGENCY REVIEW. Copies of the request and supporting materials were
forwarded to all City departments and involved public agencies for review and comment. All
comments received to date have been summarized below:
Public Works Superintendent Fackler
Public Works Supervisor Hanson
-633-
Property stakes will need to be visible to
demonstrate that the proposed new fence
is on private property.
No sight obstruction issues. Property stakes
must be visible on site by the applicant and
will be verified by Staff.
Barb Fackler, Hennepin County
HKGi Consultant Planner Trapp
Hennepin County is oftentimes concerned
with fences placed alongside the Right -of-
Way, especially privacy fences. We are
primarily concerned for snow storage and
sight lines for side streets and /or driveways.
The proposed fence as shown in the
supporting documents does not appear to
cause either of those issues for the County
Road.
I have no specific comments.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend
Council approval of the variance request based on the following findings:
1. A fence formerly existed on the subject property which buffered the property from the
adjacent public beach and lake use.
2. The fence will help afford the property owner enjoyment of the property as it is located
next to Brighton Commons which includes a public beach and access road.
3. The portion of the proposed fence that is located between the front and rear building
lines of the house is consistent with the City's requirements. The requested variance is
for the portion which extends behind the rear building line in the lakeshore setback area
which is limited to no more than 3 FT and includes a transparency provision. The
proposed wooden fence will blend with natural surroundings in the subject area.
4. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are met.
-634-
s
nAAk
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620
VARIANCE
APPLICATION
PAID
op
Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application.
Planning Commission Date Case No. f�?—
City Council Date
Please tvpe or print legibly
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
LEGAL
DESC.
Address Ada
Lot
Subdivision
PID #
13 L-ViQ
Block
Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one)
PROPERTY
Name
\A) t o�k�- Email "� \/Vr Q G t- A9A6C6" && O
OWNER
Address
Phone
Home (m2-- IN4 -ZW4 W� BIZ - Z d 2 } Fax
APPLICANT
Name
Email
(IF OTHER
THAN
OWNER)
Address
Phone
Home
Work Fax
1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? Yes �4No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
Variance Information -635-
(12/13/2011) Page 4 of 9
1��a1
2. Detailed description of proposed construction [orr alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, /etc.):
CO N S -D204L i FN> UAL / r AL F L(o Fr Soy - i o> ! coti (,
PA PEATY L-I m f- Po &—I c- 3 aAc-k CaQs-NZ,'c--N oa
S� �� Fi-�1 � �i.Ai\15 e I !2� `T' � r..��L i� � F`F� tv �—T� �� \ ��£�v i /�►
Pt 4--r-v lZe S. -
Variance Information -636-
(12/13/2011) Page 5 of 9
Case No.
3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED
(or existing)
VARIANCE
Front Yard: (N S E W)
ft.
ft.
ft.
Side Yard: (N S E W)
ft.
ft.
ft.
Side Yard: (N S E W)
ft.
ft.
ft.
Rear Yard: (N S E W)
ft.
ft.
ft.
Lakeside: (N S E W)
ft.
ft.
ft.
(NSEW)
ft.
ft.
ft.
Street Frontage:
ft.
ft.
ft.
Lot Size:
sq ft
sq ft
sq ft
Hardcover:
sq ft
sq ft
sq ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes$, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use:
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography () soil
( ) too small ( ) drainage {) existing situation
{ ) too shallow ( ) shape () other: specify
Please describe:
Variance Information -637-
(12/13/2011) Page 6 of 9
Case No. -io
6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the
land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), Noo—If yes, explain:
7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property
described in
this petition? YesK, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9
Comments:
Variance Information -638-
(12/13/2011) Page 8 of 9
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by law.
Owner's Signature,
Date 12-
ZZ8 !
Applicant's Signature Date
Variance Information -639-
(12/13/2011) Page 9 of 9
ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax (952) 474 8267
SURVEY FOR: ROBERT WINKLER
SURVEYED:January 31, 2008 DRAFTED: January 31, 2008 REV.: February 27, 2008
REV.: May 2, 2008 to show new size home and deck for your review.
REV.: May 6, 2008 to show revised stairs and to correct lake setback.
REV.: May 12, 2008 to show corrected legal description.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
All that part of Block 40, Wychwood, according to the record plat thereof on file and of
record in the office of the Registrar of titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeasterly corner of
said Block 40; thence Northwesterly along the Easterly line of said Block 40 a distance of
55 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence deflecting to the left 102
degrees 59 minutes for a distance of 103 feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake
Minnetonka and there terminating.
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal. description.
The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a
legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with
competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters
of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. This
legal description relies on the boundaries of Block 40, in Wychwood and there is no longer
evidence remaining of the corners set with that subdivision that we have been able to find.
We have found iron pins set on the dividing line described above and have used them to
show where this property is located but only a court could decide on the location of Block
40 of Wychwood to determine that these iron pins are correct or not.
2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important.
3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the corners of the property.
4. Showing and tabulating hard cover and area of the lot for your review and for the
review of such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over hard cover
requirements.
5. While we show proposed improvements to your property, we not as familiar with
your plans as you are nor are we as familiar with the requirements of governmental.
agencies as their employees are. We suggest that you review the survey to confirm that
the proposals are what you intend and submit the survey to such governmental agencies as
may have jurisdiction over your project to gain their approvals if you can.
6. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the
topography of the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this
survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the map when
determining other elevations for use on this site.
7. Showing your proposal to build a new home on the property for your review and for the
review of such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over your project.
I hereby cent
under my &
Professional
OM
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
" • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearu_640 to License Number 9235, set,
unless otherwise noted.
EDGE OF 1
JUNE 20(
a
_ C °--
that this plan, specifica ' n,
;t supervision and that I am
.irveyor under the laws of the
I ;r P.E. & P.S. No. 9235
--CK
1 6' WOOD
I rEa
I G 929.4
report or survey was prepared by me or HARDCOVER CALCULATION.
licensed Professional Engineer and EXISTING HARDCOVER
HOUSE = 450
to of innesota.1 DECK = 329
DRIWWA Y = 479
10, O� V TOTAL = 1,258
' (� LOT AREA = 6,719
HARDCOVER = 18.7X
o
PROPOSED HARDCOVER
N
N HOUSE = 1527
ti r,
""%DECKS= 160
932. 4 9.g �1" DR/VEWA Y = 493
33.0 STEPS= 97
a R� ROCKWALLS = 101
933.6p S �j _ TOTAL = 2378
4V W
/
PC4d
�°`�
tiN. of
�e
%j
12~
6' Maple
I I . qw � \1
LOT AREA = 6,719
11 HARDCOVER = 354$
VARIANCE REQUESTEI
,,," '&* TO ALLOW 15 FOOT
SETBACK FRONT
--`—PROPOSED
�.
DWELLING
LOW FLOOR
h.
(GARAGE) = 934.0
CE
PROPOSED ROCK
RETAINING WALL
TOP = 940.7
BOTTOM = 936.7
PROPOSED ROCK
RETAINING
o
WALL TOP = 936.5
O
.0
0
V J
v
�Sd
L/ F GRAF�IIC SCALE
J 0 10 2D 40
N�
IN FEET
1 inch = 20 it
v 641-
DR W. NO. 08002
r-o
ri
-642-
Coo
4A. —
C'3
cn
cn
ct
CIS
C) r
INN-
cn
0
0
C)
M
N
-643-
Cfj
C -v
o ? �
U �
C,j •�
O Cd
� � O
O C13 'I,
O
bOA O
C,3
� O
�15 C13
O E
bA M
� � U
C�
� I �
M 3
� o
a� -d
4 by
� O �
� � O
N
� 3 �
_O
A
0
c�
'b
bA
M
-644-
oA ,�
O � U
C
- = to
O •-
Cd
O
U
CIO
E
O
U U
U � N
r, "d
� 3 �
C,3 �
o Lt .�
cd
U ; U
Cd
U
� U
� U
N � �
A
U
bA
U U �
3
C, 3 U c
o c o
0
-645-
U
o
O � O
� � A
RO
to O
U O N
cd C>ls C
O
b
O
O ^d
CA
Cd
a�
� O
O 0
O on
U O �
U 0 U
3 Cd
to
to
0
�b
ti 0 O
sue. O Q
N c'
� � I
� 3 �
-646-
3 �
O
� y
� � b
o � �
U U �
Ct
CIS
U 7 U
M U
O � U
.p M
Z 03
� o
CJ0
as
bb
Ct
U 1 U
vs o E
o .
E -1
-647-
3
to O O Cd
?i F I:Lq c cd
r
T Cd � U
E > a� y
Y {
rA
a�
b U
U orb
r
O U• Cd
Qr
v Q
U
,Cd Q"
O
-648-
O � O
U
U
O y
'� 3 •X b b
cd X zn
03 �
M•� U
bA "C
E
'd zi
CA u o
03 M
> >
a�
U
C�
AL
JRIF
41 ;
-649-
blall
..
-650-
a�
c�
cd
C
M
u
U
t�
�•
1 !" +j
({2
cu
S,4
cis
i
U
Cd
a
�
y
r
r
-651-
s
3.
�•
1 !" +j
({2
i
y
r
r
-651-
s
3.
Doc W454.117 1.'W,3jM0,00Q.*00 PM
Certified filed and or rewrded,On 00ve .0113te:
Offjos Of the Registrar of Titles:
Hennepin n Cou�, MI�0060 e
Michael H. Cuhntff, Rdpistmr of filles
TrainelD 452695
Now cert Cert
851701
�(3�Y
j. It
-652-
Deputy 55
Fees
$1.56 AF
$1Q.59 STATEFEE
S34,00 TDOWEE
$0.0.0-TSUR
$2.OD COPY
$48;,0 1 0 Total
CERTIFICATE
City of Mound
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)SS
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and the City Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota,
hereby attest and certify that:
1. As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which
the attached and forgoing extract was transcribed.
2. 1 have carefully compared said extract with said original record.
3. 1 find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the
original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on the date
indicated in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting,
insofar as they relate to:
RESOLUTION NO. 08 -57
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT
5001 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
P &Z CASE #08 -02
PID #24- 117 -24 -13 -0034
Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on
the 27th day of May, 2008.
WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 28th day of
May, 2008.
Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-653-
i
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 08 -57
RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 5001 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
P & Z CASE # 08 -02
PID #.24- 117 -24 -13 -0034
WHEREAS, the applicant, T. Rob Winkler, has submitted a request for a variance in order to
replace the existing home at 5001 Wilshire Boulevard with a new one; and
WHEREAS, the property is located at the intersection of Wilshire and Brighton Boulevards, the
property was originally platted as part of Block 40 of the Wychwood Subdivision. The Zoning is
R -1, Single Family Residential; and
WHEREAS, the property, according to Hennepin County data, currently has a house.that was
built in 1920 and is a non - conforming structure; and
WHEREAS, the applicant proposes the following development standards for this existing lot of
record in his survey, submitted on May 12, 2008:
and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting a 15 foot variance to the front property line; and
WHEREAS, replacing the existing home is an improvement as the existing, nonconforming
home only has 450 square feet of livable area; and
-654-
Required
Proposed /Existing
Variance
Lot Area
10,000 sq. ft.
6,719 sq. ft.
-
Lot Width
60 feet
55 feet
-
Lot Depth
80 feet
101+ feet
-
Front Yard Setback
30 feet
15 feet
15 feet
Rear Yard Setback
15 feet
50 feet
-
Side Yard Setback — East
10 feet
10 feet
-
Side Yard Setback - West
6 feet
6 feet
-
OHWL Setback
50 feet
50 feet
-
Hardcover (maximum .40%)
40%
36%
-
and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting a 15 foot variance to the front property line; and
WHEREAS, replacing the existing home is an improvement as the existing, nonconforming
home only has 450 square feet of livable area; and
-654-
Resolution No. 08 -57
WHEREAS, the new location improves traffic safety and movement as the driveway is relocated
off of Brighton Boulevard and onto the access driveway; and
WHEREAS, the new location provides a greater setback on Brighton Boulevard as the existing
home is on the property line; and
WHEREAS, replacing the existing home will reduce the number of variances for this property
from the four recognized in Resolution 91 -105 to one; and
WHEREAS, at its April 14, 2008 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance
application that previously included a request for a front setback of 8.26 FT and a lakeshore
setback of 45.6 FT and recommended denial of the variance; and
WHEREAS, the applicant subsequently revised the plans in an attempt to address the
comments and concerns of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the application with the May 12, 2008 survey and
deemed that the concerns of the Planning Commission were addressed; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound does
hereby approve a 15 -foot front yard setback variance, as requested by the applicant with the
following conditions:
1. Structures, except balconies, decks and staircases as allowed, shall not be built into the
required front, side and rear yards.
2. A foundation survey is required if a proposed building is within 5 feet of the required
minimum front/side /rear setbacks.
3. New construction on the property-shall conform to the City Code regulations in all
regards with the exception of the approved front setback variance for the new house.
4. The Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) for the City of Mound is 933 feet.
Floodplain regulations require that the lowest floor of all structures including basements
and crawl spaces must be constructed at or above the RFPE.
5. Hardcover shall be limited to 40 %. Where pervious pavers are used to meet this
requirement, the installation shall be by a commercial contractor. An as -built survey shall
be submitted for all areas where pervious pavers were used to certify that the installation
was done according to the submitted plan. This as -built survey shall be signed by a
professional engineer. Staff suggests the applicant contact the manufacturer of the
pervious paver product to determine what inspections will be required to provide for
"sign -off' on the as -built survey by the manufacturer. Applicant should be advised that
inspection(s) at specific intervals may be required.
6. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties or onto Brighton Boulevard. The
applicant shall work with staff on the design and construction of the retaining walls
immediately adjacent to Brighton Boulevard.
7. The curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction including but
not limited to installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be
replaced.
8. Payment of any City fees for review of the variance application.
-655-
Resolution No. 08 -57
9. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part
of this land use action.
10. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit
applications, when appropriate.
11. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits.
12. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County.
The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all
conditions have been met.
13. No building permits will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution has been
provided to the City unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file or submitted
with the City of Mound.
14. For many years a portion of the property has been occupied by Brighton Boulevard. In
order to memorialize the location of Brighton Boulevard, the applicant will provide the
city with a permanent easement for road purposes over under and across the portion of
the property currently occupied by Brighton Boulevard. The city will determine the legal
description of the easement area and prepare the document at the expense of the city.
Execution and delivery of the easement by the applicant shall be a precondition to
delivery of this resolution to applicant for recording.
15. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use
application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with
the City.
16. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 15.99, all other requests as submitted in the
original or any subsequent application(s) to the extent not specifically approved herein
are hereby denied.
17. This variance(s) is approved for the following legally described property:
All that part of Block 40, Wychwood, according to the record plat thereof on file and of
record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Southeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeasterly corner said
Block 40; thence Northwesterly along the Easterly line of said Block 40 a distance of 55 feet to
the point of beginning of the line to be described, thence deflecting to the left 103 degrees 11
minutes 42 seconds for a distance of 103 feet, more or less, to the shore of Lake Minnetonka
and there terminating.
Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May, 2008.
/s/ Bonnie Ritter
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
/s/ Mark Hanus
Mayor Mark Hanus
-656 - 3
December 29, 2011
To: Mound Planning Commission
Mound City Council
e
rs
��
aR�
Re: Construction of Privacy Fence Between..001 Wilshire and the Mound Swimming Area
First, I am utterly surprised that replacing a fence that was destroyed by teenagers out of control is even
a question in anyones mind.
Second, the owner of the property decided not to file charges against the teenagers who were in custody
at the beach. The owners charity was not returned by the parents of the vandalizing teenagers. The
parents made no effort to replace the fence.
The father of the present owner developed the entire area 2001 -2025 and deeded the land to the city for
the swimming area. A little quid pro quo would seem to be in order.
The fence will also provide a degree of privacy to the other owners of the adjacent properties. We will
not have to watch some teenage girl take off her bra and wave it over her head to attract some teenage
boys into the water. We won't have to watch some young boy mooning the other bathers. Nor will we
have to watch an adult female and male swimming nude in an embrace. Neither will I have to listen to
some kids using the beach after hours. The above has all takevlplace since Mound felt the value and cost
of keeping a lifeguard was not "cost effective"
In most cases I did not call the police. They have a tough enough job without responding to the above. I
know well what the police have to deal with. I had many M.P.'s under my post command at Fort Riley.
CFS:
1) Owners 4001, 1017, , 021,,029
2) Files
lr�espectf ,
rohnn Sobraske
Colonel, USA, Retired
-657-
Gary L. Steffens
5021 Wilshire Blvd.
Mound, MN 55364
December 30, 2011
Mound Planning Commission
Mound City Council
Re: Construction of privacy fence between ?`001 Wilshire Blvd and Mound Swimming
Area.
The Mound Swimming Area is widely used, from morning to late evening and
throughout the seasons. To have such a public place without a definite separation
between it and a private residence is a setup for conflict, whether that be the errant pet,
bather, frisbee or beachball that strays off public space or the nuisance noise from
motorists taking the shortcut across the lake from that point at all hours during the winter.
A fence, either provided by the city or privately constructed, will easily pay for itself in
eliminating these conflicts and associated calls to law enforcement.
Part of the beach experience is sightseeing. How much comfort can there be in enjoying
one's backyard, knowing that the crowded area right next door is filled with folks who at
any time may be looking at you? Privacy is a basic right and this right is particularly
relevant in this situation.
The father of the current owner of the residence at 5001 graciously deeded the swimming
area to the people for their use. It seems very unlikely he would have done so had he
known that his generosity would significantly complicate and diminish his sons ability to
enjoy his home, particularly the outdoors in the summertime. It seems only right that the
city respond with similar graciousness and consideration and support the building of a
privacy fence between the Mound Swimming Area and 5001 Wihire Blvd.
4 Y, S; cerel,
L. Steffens, LICSW
;r of 5021/5023 Wilshire.
Mound Planning Commission
Mound City Council
December 30, 2011
INRE: Construction of Privacy Fence between 5001 Wilshire and the Mound swimming area
I am in total agreement with and have witness everything that has been stated in John (Jack)
Sobraske's letter (enclosed).
I would like to add that, if a privacy fence is not built it would also be detrimental to the patrons
of the beach. It's not safe to have children and young adults climbing on neighboring docks and
walking through private property with bare feet and swim suits. It's also against the law.
Trespassing and vandalism will happen, and has happened for the past 24 years. Not just on the
adjacent properties, but two or three houses down from the beach as well. And I assure you,
the police will have to get involved in some cases —a total waste of their time when a fence
could eliminate most of these circumstances.
It would be a shame that a mere technicality (build within a year) could result in a decision that
is damaging to all.
Sincerely,
61oAnn Deveny
Property owner and taxpayer for 24 years at
5017 Wilshire Blvd.
-659-
Executive Summary
0
YT AIRS
TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner
DATE: March 7, 2012
SUBJECT: PC Case 12 -03, 4568 Denbigh Road Variance Request
REQUEST SUMMARY. The property owner and applicant, Steve Bedell, has requested a
variance for the property at 4568 Denbigh Road for the purposing of replacing the existing 1920s
single - family, walk -out with a new single - family home. (Note: the home was recently
demolished following permit issuance on February 24, 2012) The property is located on Seton
Channel on the north side of Denbigh Road between Cardigan and Cardiff Lanes. The
topography of the site rises significantly from Seton Channel to Denbigh Road. A variance is
requested to allow the home to be built within the bluff setback required by the shoreland
ordinances.
Of note in your consideration of this request, 4568 and 4552 Denbigh Road were involved in a
minor subdivision request in 2005 from Todd Hovren (applicant) to take the two properties and
create three buildable parcels. At that time, the existing home at 4568, called parcel C, was
intended to remain. The minor subdivision was approved with a variance to allow the
construction of homes on parcels A and B within the bluff setback area.
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. The Planning
Commission reviewed this case at their March 6th meeting. A motion for approval of the
variance to allow the construction of the home within the bluff setback area was made, seconded
and passed unanimously to the City Council. The Planning Commission acknowledged the
following findings of fact in support of the variance as suggested by staff
1. The neighborhood was platted prior to the enactment of a Shoreland Management
Ordinance.
2. Grading of the neighborhood for residential development altered the natural character of
the bluff.
3. Similar circumstances exist for a large percentage of the homes along the north side of
Denbigh Road that are also built on the bluff.
4. Granting the variance will not be a detriment the purposes of the Ordinance.
12.660 -t Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
RECOMMENDATION. As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval
of the variance request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. The
minute excerpts (draft) of the March 6, 2012 Planning Commission meeting have also been
included. Staff recommends approval of the resolution with its findings of fact and conditions.
OTHER INFORMATION.
Per 3/8 email from MCWD Staff, MCWD Permit No. 12 -045 for erosion control, issued
on 2/23/2012, covers both the demolition of the house and construction of the proposed
new house.
• Public Works Director Carlton Moore gave permission to the contractor, Tom Betz, to
exceed the spring load limits on Denbigh and Cardiff as they will be reconstructed this
summer. The contractor was advised that the City cannot do the same for Wilshire
Boulevard (County Road 125) as it is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County.
12: -661 -i Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
RESOLUTION # 12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND
APPROVING A VARIANCE
FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4568 DENBIGH ROAD
P & Z CASE # 12 -03
PID # 19- 117 -23 -24 -0109
WHEREAS, the applicant, Steve Bedell, has submitted a variance request to allow the
construction of a home within the bluff setback at 4568 Denbigh Road; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R -1A Single - Family Residential and is subject
to the regulations of the shoreland management ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the property was involved in a minor subdivision in 2005 which was
approved by Resolution #05 -108 and designated the property as having non lot -of-
record status; and
WHEREAS, the topography of the site rises significantly from Seton Channel to Denbigh
Road resulting in the entire property being a bluff; and
WHEREAS, as shown in the table below, the applicant is proposing to construct a home
that meets all setbacks except the construction within the bluff:
; and
-662-
Required
Proposed /Existing Variance
Lot Area
6,000 sq. ft.
7,948 sq. ft. -
Lot Width
40 feet
49.47 feet -
Lot Depth
80 feet
150 feet -
Front Yard (south)
20 feet
20 feet -
Rear /Lakeshore (north)
50 feet
70 feet -
Side Yard (west)
10 feet
10 feet -
Side Yard (east)
10 feet
10 feet -
Hardcover (maximum 30 %)
2,384 sq. ft.
2,226 sq. ft. -
Bluff
10 feet from top
In bluff Requested
-662-
WHEREAS, the proposed home will eliminate the 6.2 foot nonconforming side yard
setback which had previously existed and which was recognized as part of the minor
subdivision and variance process in 2005; and
WHEREAS, a bluff setback variance was granted in 2005 as part of the minor
subdivision process for the other two properties which were part of the subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the subject property has already been significantly altered due to the
construction of the previous house, garage and retaining walls; and
WHEREAS, details regarding the variance application are contained in Planning Report
No. 12 -03; and
WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the submitted variance request; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the application at its March 6, 2012
meeting and recommended approval of the variance request; and
WHEREAS, at its March 13, 2012 meeting, the City Council in their review of the
proposed project found practical difficulties for the property owner which could be
relieved through the granting of a variance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota as follows:
1. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance
request to allow the construction of a home within the bluff setback based on
the following findings of fact:
a. The neighborhood was platted prior to the enactment of a Shoreland
Management Ordinance.
b. Grading of the neighborhood for residential development altered the
natural character of the bluff.
C. Similar circumstances exist for a large percentage of the homes along the
north side of Denbigh Road that are also built on the bluff.
d. Granting the variance will not be a detriment to the purposes of the
Ordinance.
2. The variance is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
a. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the
variance request.
b. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon
submittal of the building permit application.
c. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all permits.
-663-
d. Structures shall not be built into the required front, side, and rear
setbacks. A foundation survey is required as the proposed structures are
within 5 feet of the required minimum front/side /rear setbacks.
e. No future approval of any development plans, building and /or related
permits are included as part of this action in the event the variance
application is approved.
f. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to
neighbor's property.
g. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or
public agency permits including the submittal of any and /or all required
information prior to building permit issuance.
h. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with
Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not
be released for recording until all conditions have been met.
i. No building permits will be issued until evidence of recording of the
resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless the resolution is filed by
the City and an escrow of sufficient amount, is on file with the City.
j. All fees associated with the land use application must be paid prior to
building permit issuance unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is
on file with the City.
k, No grading, alteration or fill is permitted below the 931.5 elevation (100 -
year floodplain for the MCWD) unless any and /or all required permit(s)
have been obtained.
I. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood
Protection Elevation. The minimum required elevation for Lake
Minnetonka is 933.0 or 3 feet above a wetland.
m. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback, bluff or
100 -year floodplain area(s).
n. Mechanical equipment can be located up to two (2) feet into setback
areas.
o. Final verification of the building height shall be required.
p. No work is authorized or approved on public property, including but not
limited to, public streets or commons as part of this application. Applicant
is advised that additional permitting may be needed in the event
construction or other related activities are undertaken on any public
streets or on public -owned land and is contingent upon the specific
improvements proposed to be constructed.
3. This variance is approved for the following legally described property:
- insert legal -
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by
Councilmember
The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative:
The following Councilmembers voted in the negative:
Adopted March 13, 2012
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Mark Hanus, Mayor
-665-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 6, 2012
Chair Ward called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners: Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas
Gawtry, David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert
and Ray Salazar. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith,
Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander.
Others present: Steve Bedell (6205 Pagenkopf Road, Independence), Tom Betz (300
Crestview, Long Lake)
APPROVE AGENDA WITH ANY AMENDMENTS
MOTION by Linkert, second by Goode, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION
carried unanimously
MOTION by Ward,
MOTION carried um
BOARD OF APPEALS
presented.
approve the February 21, 2012 minutes as
A. PC Case No. 12 -03 Variance — New House
4568 Denbigh Road Owner: Steve Bedell
Rita Trapp introduced the case. A variance is requested for the purpose of replacing the
existing 1920s single - family, walk -out with a new home. The topography of the site
rises significantly from Seton Channel to Denbigh Road. The applicant is requesting a
variance for construction within a bluff. A 2005 variance for construction in the bluff
was approved for the two adjacent lots.
Staff is recommending approval of the variance with the conditions listed in the
planning report as the requirements in City Code Section 129 -39 are being met and
because variances were granted to the adjacent properties in the same situation.
Linkert asked for a little history on the 2005 subdivision. Trapp indicated that, originally,
there had been 2 lots that were subdivided into 3; all conforming to the code. The
variance for construction in a bluff wasn't requested for this lot because, at that time,
this house was intended to remain.
Salazar summarized the variance request in light of the code requirements and the
precedent set by the 2005 variance approval.
Steve Bedell (6205 Pagenkopf Road, Independence) He likes the neighborhood a lot. It's
an area that takes obvious pride in home ownership. When finished, the property will
be more conforming to the Code than it was and, hopefully, an asset to the
neighborhood.
Salazar asked about the sub - garage and confirmed its purpose as storage. He suggested
that a doorway be placed into the house directly from the sub - garage.
Retterath questioned the sideyard deck setbacks. Trapp indicated that they follow the
accessory structure setbacks. The applicant's plan just meets the code at 6.1 feet. He
also questioned the building height for the proposed dwelling. Staff indicated that they
intend to investigate that further before permit issuance.
MOTION by Linkert, second by Gawtry, to recommend _approval of the variance with the
conditions outlined by staff. MOTION carried unanimously.
-667-
PLANNING REPORT
HK
3i
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Rita Trapp
DATE: March 1, 2012
MEETING DATE: March 6, 2012
APPLICANT: Steve Bedell
REQUEST: Variance
CASE NUMBERS: 12 -03
LOCATION: 4568 Denbigh Road
PROPERTY ID: 19- 117 -23 -24 -0109
ZONING: R -1A Single Family Residential
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential
BACKGROUND
The property owner and applicant, Steve Bedell, has requested a variance for the -
property at 4568 Denbigh Road for the purposing of replacing the existing 1920s single -
family, walk -out with a new single - family home. A demolition permit for removal of the
house was issued on February 24, 2012. The property is located on Seton Channel on
the north side of Denbigh Road between Cardigan and Cardiff Lanes. To the west and
south of the property are single - family homes. To the east is 4560 Denbigh Road, a lot
with the former garage for 4568 Denbigh Road that is poised for redevelopment to
include a new single - family home. While the garage is primarily on 4560 Denbigh Road,
a few feet of the southwest corner is located on the subject parcel.
The topography of the site rises significantly from Seton Channel to Denbigh Road.
Currently a garage, primarily located on 4560 Denbigh Road, is placed on a pad created
by retaining walls that are generally even with Denbigh Road. The grade then drops
significantly to the area where the walk -out home is built. The grade further changes in
the rear yard where there are retaining walls facing Seton Channel. The condition of the
original home showed signs of needing major repairs to maintain safety; also the
retaining walls and stairs.
In 2005, 4568 and 4552 Denbigh Road were involved in a minor subdivision request
from Todd Hovren (applicant) to take the two properties and create three buildable
parcels. At that time, the existing home at 4568, called parcel C, was intended to
remain. The subdivision resulted in each of the lots having non -lot of record status. The
applicant proposed new homes on parcels A and B and requested variances to allow for
the construction within a bluff. The approval of the variance was based on the following
findings of fact:
123 No-668-,d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
p. 2
#12 -03 4568 Denbigh Road Variance
March 1, 2012
1. The neighborhood was platted prior to the enactment of a Shoreland
Management Ordinance.
2. Grading of the neighborhood for residential development altered the natural
character of the bluff.
3. Similar circumstances exist for a large percentage of the homes along the north
side of Denbigh Road that are also built on the bluff.
4. Granting the variance would not detriment the purposes of this Ordinance.
PROPOSED DIMENSIONS
REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Section 129 -39 Subd (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City
of Mound. Variances are available, but not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner
in those areas where the Zoning Ordinance imposes Practical Difficulties in the use of
the owner's land. A variance can be granted only if the following circumstances exist:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as
defined in City Code Subsection 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
hardship.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the
variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
123 No,669 -d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
Required
Proposed /Existing Variance
Lot Area
6,000 sq. ft.
7,948 sq. ft. -
Lot Width
40 feet
49.47 feet -
Lot Depth
80 feet
150 feet -
Front Yard (south)
20 feet
20 feet -
Rear /Lakeshore (north)
50 feet
70 feet -
Side Yard (west)
10 feet
10 feet -
Side Yard (east)
10 feet
10 feet -
Hardcover (maximum 30 %)
2,384 sq. ft.
2,226 sq. ft. -
Bluff
10 feet from top
In bluff Requested
REVIEW PROCEDURE
City Code Section 129 -39 Subd (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City
of Mound. Variances are available, but not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner
in those areas where the Zoning Ordinance imposes Practical Difficulties in the use of
the owner's land. A variance can be granted only if the following circumstances exist:
(1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as
defined in City Code Subsection 129 -2.
(2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands,
structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to
property within the same zone.
(3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the
hardship.
(4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the
variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan.
123 No,669 -d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
p. 3
#12 -03 4568 Denbigh Road Variance
March 1, 2012
According to City Code Section 129 -2, practical difficulties as used in conjunction with a
variance means that:
L The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner
not permitted by the zoning ordinance;
The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property
including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not
created by the landowner; and
iii. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the
locality.
Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical
difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for
solar energy systems.
60 -DAY PROCESS
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are
required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. The variance application
was received on or around February 6, 2012. A letter of completeness was sent to the
owner on February 27, 2012.
NOTIFICATION
City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of variance requests by
mailed notice. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that this activity was
completed on or about March 2, 2012.
CITY DEPARTMENT AND AGENCY REVIEW
Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments
and involved public agencies for review and comment. Comments received are
summarized below:
Dan Faulkner, City Applicant shall ensure the new driveway will drain away
Engineer from the garage and that street drainage will be able to
stay in the street. Applicant will need to provide a profile
of the proposed driveway and how it matches in to the
existing street. Depending on the timing of the new
home construction, the applicant should wait on the
drive installation until street reconstruction is completed.
123 Nor - 670 -a1 Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
p. 4
#12 -03 4568 Denbigh Road Variance
March 1, 2012
Ray Hanson, Public Works Question whether there is a bluff on this lot given that
Supervisor the property was previously developed
Scott Qualle, Building
Official
Jim Fackler, Public Works
Superintendent
Steve Christopher, MCWD
DISCUSSION
If the proposed home ends up closer than 5 feet to the
property line, fire resistive construction will be required.
No comments.
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has noted that the
applicant will be subject to the standard items with any
new home construction such as erosion control. If
triggered this could also include floodplain
alteration, wetland protection or shoreline
improvement rule permitting.
• The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a home within
a bluff. The Shoreland Management Rules in City Code Section 129 -385 requires
that structures be placed 10 feet from the top of the bluff. According to City Code
Section 129 -2, a bluff means a topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or
embankment having all of the following characteristics:
(1) Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area;
(2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high -water level of
the water body;
(3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or
more above the ordinary high -water level averages 30 percent or
greater; and
(4) The slope must drain toward the water body.
Site topography on this site slopes from the southeast to the northwest with an
elevation change of about 36 feet over the approximately 150 feet from Denbigh
Road down to Seton Channel. Due to the slope of the lot, basically the entire lot
is a bluff.
While the site is a bluff, the bluff has already been altered significantly through
the historical construction of the house, garage and retaining walls. This
circumstance was noted previously in the variances that were granted in 2005 for
the construction of homes on 4560 and 4552 Denbigh. Staff also notes that
requiring a 10 foot setback from the top of the bluff would prevent the applicant
from constructing a home on the property given how much of the site is part of
the bluff. Given the state of the original home, Staff is supportive of the
123 No�671 -rd Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
p. 5
#12 -03 4568 Denbigh Road Variance
March 1, 2012
applicant's request. Staff also notes that the redevelopment of this lot will
improve its conformity as the current 6.2 foot side yard setback variance will be
eliminated as the proposed home will be built at the non lot of record setback
requirement of 10 feet.
• The applicant has indicated that the owners of the garage on 4560 Denbigh are
intending to disassemble the garage for reuse on another site.
• Proposed building plans dated 2 -14 -2012 for the new house were submitted and
are under review. The applicant is advised that the maximum building height in a
residential zone is 35 feet.
• The applicant is proposing that 28% of the lot will be hardcover. Given that the lot
does not have lot of record status, the maximum allowed is 30 %. The
calculations provided on the survey include the house, entry, sidewalk, 30%
permeable driveway, and retaining walls. Applicant is advised that use of
pervious paver product must follow City of Mound policy and requires the
submittal of an engineered plan to include manufacturer's specifications.
Maximum allowed reduction is not more than 85 percent. Professional
commercial installation required. Questions regarding paver products should be
directed Public Works Supervisor Ray Hanson. Applicant is further advised that
an as -built survey is required and must be signed by professional engineer. Staff
suggests the applicant check to see what requirements and /or inspections will be
needed during the installation process so as to be able to procure an as -built
document to verify the amount of permeability.
• The applicant is proposing that the new home will be built to the front and side
yard setback lines. Staff notes that eaves are allowed to encroach no more than
2 feet into setback areas. Gutters are exempt from setback regulations. Staff
further notes that steps are allowable encroachments as long as they are located
a minimum of two (2) feet from any lot line.
• The applicant is also proposing a deck on the rear of the home. City Code
Subsection 1229 -197 (3) states that:
Decks, balconies, and the like, attached to the principal building which extend in elevation above
the height of the ground floor elevation of the principal building; and decks, balconies, and the
like, detached from the principal building and exceeding 30 inches in height above the
surrounding grade, provided that such structures described in this subsection do not extend
within ten feet of the rear lot line or extend beyond side yard and front yard accessory building
setbacks. On lakeshore lots, such structures shall comply with the Lakeshore setback of the
principal structure.
123 No,672_d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
p. 6
#12 -03 4568 Denbigh Road Variance
March 1, 2012
Based on this subsection, the applicant is advised that the deck may not extend
beyond the side yard and front yard setback standards for accessory buildings. In
the case of a lakeshore lot, City Code Subsection 129- 194(f) states that when a
deck is in the rear or front yards the side yard setback is 4 feet, while the side
yard setback for a deck immediately adjacent the home is 6 feet.
• Applicant is advised that road restrictions go into effect on Monday, March 5,
2012. Information regarding road restrictions and /or weight limits for roads
should be directed to Public Works Supervisor Ray Hanson.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission
recommend Council approval of the requested variance to allow the construction of a
home in the bluff with the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the
variance request.
2. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of
the building permit application.
3. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all permits.
4. Structures shall not be built into the required front, side, and rear setbacks. A
foundation survey is required as the proposed structures are within 5 feet of the
required minimum front/side /rear setbacks.
5. No future approval of any development plans, building and /or related permits are
included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved.
6. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighbor's
property.
7. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public
agency permits including the submittal of any and /or all required information prior
to building permit issuance.
8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin
County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for
recording until all conditions have been met.
123 No- 673 --d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
p. 7
#12 -03 4568 Denbigh Road Variance
March 1, 2012
9. No building permits will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at
Hennepin County is provided unless the resolution is filed by the City and an
escrow of sufficient amount, is on file with the City.
10. All fees associated with the land use application must be paid prior to building
permit issuance unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the
City.
11. No grading, alteration or fill is permitted below the 931.5 elevation (100 -year
floodplain for the MCWD) unless any and /or all required permit(s) have been
obtained.
12. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection
Elevation. The minimum required elevation for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0 or 3
feet above a wetland.
13. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback, bluff or 100 -year
floodplain area(s).
14. Mechanical equipment can be located up to two (2) feet into setback areas.
15. Final verification of the building height shall be required.
16. No work is authorized or approved on public property, including but not limited to,
public streets or commons as part of this application. Applicant is advised that
additional permitting may be needed in the event construction or other related
activities are undertaken on any public streets or on public -owned land and is
contingent upon the specific improvements proposed to be constructed.
In recommending approval of the requested variance, Staff offers the following findings
of fact:
1. The neighborhood was platted prior to the enactment of a Shoreland
Management Ordinance.
2. Grading of the neighborhood for residential development altered the natural
character of the bluff.
3. Similar circumstances exist for a large percentage of the homes along the north
side of Denbigh Road that are also built on the bluff.
4. Granting the variance will not be a detriment the purposes of the Ordinance.
123 Nor- 674-d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
P. 8
#12 -03 4568 Denbigh Road Variance
March 1, 2012
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW. If a recommendation is received from the Planning
Commission at its March 6, 2012 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be
forwarded to the City Council for review and action at the March 27, 2012 City Council
meeting.
123 No-675--d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
(612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838
E
d�
f
t
i
{
VARIANCE
--
106 IWsl�P -- , '-. APPLICATION
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 5,53i'�
Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -OiO
Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application.
Planning Commission Date
M 4 ec,�- (0
City Council Date M lee, h --7
Please type or print legibly
Case No. Ion `a3
SUBJECT
Address � 13 b-e A)
6 / T �OA-)>
PROPERTY
Lot ` °� j c)
Block
LEGAL
DESC.
Subdivision
PID # 1 9 — / �' ��� -�-' ��
2 Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 131 B2 63 (Circle one)
PROPERTY
Name J(F— V RE LDEcc
Email HOMES(�?REoELiQA) L14)C
OWNER
n
Address ��-3 A Lc-
n,� .�i
( !v1 GV,IdID
Phone Home6a Work
Fax
APPLICANT
Name
Email
(IF OTHER
It
THAN ' '
Address
",
OWNED)
Phone Home Work
Fax
Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? Yes (X) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s)
and provide copies of resolutions.
R L . ivr 0-1
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
w P1�
Variance Information -676-
(2/3/2012) Page 4 of 6
Cate No..
P�se�
3. Do the4r M&C struct1VJ comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
district in which it is located? Yes ()J No ( ). ff no, specify each non - conforming use (describe meson
for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.):
Agi
REQUIRED
REQUESTED
(or existing)
Front Yard:
(P E W)
C ft.
fL
Side Yard:
(N S@E W)
/ C.� ft.
ft.
Side Yard:
( N S IQ)
ZO ft.
ft.
Rear Yard:
(N S E W)
ft•
ft.
Lakeside:
(OS E W)
•
(N S E W)
Street Frontage:
ft,
%
Lot Size:
L�Q �� soft
.7q-4Y4
sI ft
Hardcover.
_,P2 Z q ft
sq ft
VARIANCE
Mwe ft.
4/&V e- ft.
I VDAJC. f
...... ft.
A/ave.. ft.
' ft.
J11oN _ ft.
Ni ft
AhbAJ ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes ( .. ), No X). N no, specify each non - conforming use:
-f-
E:
LA FP
P
T
n 71
a✓v�+ �. i
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
eases permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow topography ( )Soil
( ) too small �drainage ( ) existing situation
( ) too shallow () shapes ( ) other: specify
Please describe:
The Topography of this. lot, like most of the lots and homes on this street
meets the definition of a Bluff and therefore requires a variance. `
Variance lr6 oration
(2/3/2012) Pape 6 of 6 -677-
Case No. l ��
6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in
the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No)(. If yes, explain:
7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes( ), No %). If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property
described in
this petition? Yes X, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as may be required by law.
Owner's Sig
Applicant's Signature L�� -
Variance Information -678-
(2/3/2012) Page 6 of 6
Dateg' 6 ° 19-
Dato_�,-r l
4568 Denbi ' Variance Application
Sarah Smith' ' -Mail to Steve Bedell
D 2/14/2012
• An erosion control fence
Hanson's request.
• A demolition permit is i
of the required abatemel
will request the existing
• A building permit applic
and new retaining walls.
been installed on lake side as per Ray
rocess to be submitted, upon completion
with Transportation Manifest The demolition
use and retaining wall be removed
on is also in process to include a new house
01 p3 iv tV1,P -C-r- � .0
✓ 5UMM A)�
A#05_8 & 01-25 4552 & 45698 Der bkk Rood for Sxbdh*
Adty 7, 2005
for parcel C with the following condkio ns and findings:
1. Payment of my City fees for review of the minor subdivision and variarnce WHostiols.
Findings of fact in support of the vans=
1. The nonconforming fient yard setback of the home is praexm&g condition not created by the
aetrow of die applicant.
2. Allowing the woe m remain with the noaconfaarrming f oat Yard satbacic until the usem
life of the building acpues will not amse the existing neigb cam.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Conncfi approve a variance to allow budding
within a bluff based with the following conditions and fmdiags:
1. Payment of any City fees for mview of the minor subdivision and variance WHcdicm&
Findings of facjt&jjqSLqq of the variance:
I . The n6gbborhood was platted prior b the enactment of a Shorrland Management Ordinsuft
2. Grading of neighborhood for residential development altered the natured character of the bhp
3. Similar circumstances exist for a large percentage of the homes along the north side of
Denbigh Road that are also built on the bhiff.
4. Cnanting the variance would not deWment tine purposes of this Ordinance.
"3 North Third Street, Suite 100, Mim>eapolis, M 35401
-68012) 338 -0800 Fax(612)3394M
■
1
■ ■i ■i ■i ■i ■i■
oi!i�i�i�i�i�i
RMPUP
T=
•• l,Jl�
I •
Ili!
:e
�WM
I=
i;fyi
■;�;r
iii
�,� �
■ ■ ■ ■■
s!i ( vow l imwm�l
i!i!i
•• l,Jl�
I •
Ili!
:e
�WM
I=
50
in!" " Nfflmil�
U�-Il
■ -.
,I
Slim
II
e
�Q
1
IVL
_4
I
r
red
7Jyf4Y cl "tJ -LO ..rTbgy -A.�6 �� •. r�s
• d
a
-
3
lift
• °gin
�$
1
1
f
i
I Z I
.W.1 ;6
.9j•II i�
z 3 Qlt:6 I 9•N {�'r
m
�I
,stis ;�► �s -� %� is � �
• ^.J I I
Ia- i I
5
'r.
-688-
i
- liq
_I
VimI
3 v�
Doc No 4190151 11/18/2005 10:00 AM
Certified filed and or recorded on above date:
Office of the Registrar of Titles
ta
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles
TranslD 163138 Deputy 37
New cert Cert Fees
1125810 $1.50 AF
1034695 $10.50 STATEFEE
$54.00 TDOCFEE
$0.00 TSUR
$2.00 COPY
$68.00 Total
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 05 -108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND
APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCES
FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 4552 AND 4568 DENBIGH ROAD
P & Z CASE # 05 -08 & 05 -23
PID # 19- 117 -23 -24 -0048 & 19- 117 -23 -24 -0011
WHEREAS, the applicant, Todd Hovren, has submitted a request for a minor subdivision
to create three buildable parcels from two existing lots of record; and
WHEREAS, the properties are located between Cardigan and Cardiff Lanes along
Avalon Channel. The property includes lots 7, 8, 9, and 10, Block 2, Avalon. The
properties as currently held, include approximately 11,700 square feet and 11,600
square feet respectively. The Zoning is R -1A, Single Family Residential; and
WHEREAS, according to Hennepin County data, each property is developed with a one -
story residence constructed in 1920. Each property also includes a detached garage.
The home on the 4552 property and the detached garages will be removed and replaced
as part of this development; and
WHEREAS, the applicant proposes the following development standards for the parcels
labeled as "A ", "B ", and "C" on the survey:
-690-
Resolution No. 05 -108
; and
WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision meets all applicable zoning minimums for
lot and bulk standards. The existing house on Parcel C has an existing nonconforming
side yard setback of 3.8 feet for which the applicant is requesting a variance. The
proposed home locations on Parcels A and B show conforming setbacks as non -lot of
record property; and
WHEREAS, site topography slopes southeast to northwest with an elevation change of
about 40 feet over the approximately 150 feet from Denbigh Road to Avalon Channel,
resulting in the homes being proposed to be built on a bluff. Section 350.1225 of the
Mound City Code requires a 10 foot setback from the top of bluff. The applicant therefore
needs a variance to allow building within a bluff; and
-691-
2
Proposed
Required Variance
Parcel A
Lot Area
8,184 sq. ft.
6,000 sq. ft. -
Lot Width (as platted measurement) 55 feet
40 feet -
Lot Depth (as platted measurement)
150 feet
80 feet -
Sideyards
10 feet
10 feet -
Frontyard
20+ feet
20 feet -
Rear /Lakeside (Lake Minnetonka)
50+ feet
50 feet -
Hardcover (maximum)
Not provided
2,455 sq. ft. -
; and
WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision meets all applicable zoning minimums for
lot and bulk standards. The existing house on Parcel C has an existing nonconforming
side yard setback of 3.8 feet for which the applicant is requesting a variance. The
proposed home locations on Parcels A and B show conforming setbacks as non -lot of
record property; and
WHEREAS, site topography slopes southeast to northwest with an elevation change of
about 40 feet over the approximately 150 feet from Denbigh Road to Avalon Channel,
resulting in the homes being proposed to be built on a bluff. Section 350.1225 of the
Mound City Code requires a 10 foot setback from the top of bluff. The applicant therefore
needs a variance to allow building within a bluff; and
-691-
2
Proposed
Required Variance
Parcel B
Lot Area
8,250 sq. ft.
6,000 sq. ft. -
Lot Width (as platted measurement) 55 feet
40 feet -
Lot Depth (as platted measurement) 150 feet
80 feet -
Sideyards
10+ feet
10 feet -
Frontyard
20+ feet
20 feet -
Rear /Lakeside (Lake Minnetonka)
50+ feet
50 feet -
Hardcover (maximum)
Not provided
2,475 sq. ft. -
; and
WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision meets all applicable zoning minimums for
lot and bulk standards. The existing house on Parcel C has an existing nonconforming
side yard setback of 3.8 feet for which the applicant is requesting a variance. The
proposed home locations on Parcels A and B show conforming setbacks as non -lot of
record property; and
WHEREAS, site topography slopes southeast to northwest with an elevation change of
about 40 feet over the approximately 150 feet from Denbigh Road to Avalon Channel,
resulting in the homes being proposed to be built on a bluff. Section 350.1225 of the
Mound City Code requires a 10 foot setback from the top of bluff. The applicant therefore
needs a variance to allow building within a bluff; and
-691-
2
Proposed
Required Variance
Parcel C
Lot Area
7,402 sq. ft.
6,000 sq. ft. -
Lot Width (as platted measurement) 49 feet
40 feet -
Lot Depth (as platted measurement)
150 feet
80 feet -
Sideyards
3.8 feet
10 feet 6.2
Frontyard
33 feet
20 feet -
Rear /Lakeside (Lake Minnetonka)
50+ feet
50 feet -
Hardcover (maximum)
2,211 sq. ft.
2,220 sq. ft. -
; and
WHEREAS, the proposed minor subdivision meets all applicable zoning minimums for
lot and bulk standards. The existing house on Parcel C has an existing nonconforming
side yard setback of 3.8 feet for which the applicant is requesting a variance. The
proposed home locations on Parcels A and B show conforming setbacks as non -lot of
record property; and
WHEREAS, site topography slopes southeast to northwest with an elevation change of
about 40 feet over the approximately 150 feet from Denbigh Road to Avalon Channel,
resulting in the homes being proposed to be built on a bluff. Section 350.1225 of the
Mound City Code requires a 10 foot setback from the top of bluff. The applicant therefore
needs a variance to allow building within a bluff; and
-691-
2
Resolution No. 05 -108
WHEREAS, given the property elevations, the proposed residences' low floor elevations
will meet or exceed the RFPE requirements of 933.0 feet; and
WHEREAS, the parcels will be required to meet the maximum of 30% impervious
surface cover with the non -lot of record status; and
WHEREAS, the minor subdivision would create a new parcel, triggering park dedication
fees of $1100 for the newly created lot (Section 330.120 Subd. 3); and
WHEREAS, Staff has reviewed the application and recommended approval of the minor
subdivision with conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and has
recommended approval of the 6.2 side yard variance for Parcel C as requested by the
applicant with the following findings of fact:
1. The nonconforming side yard setback of the home is a pre- existing condition
not created by the actions of the applicant.
2. Allowing the residence to remain with the nonconforming side yard setback
until the useful life of the building expires will not change the existing
neighborhood character.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the application and has
recommended approval of a variance allowing building within a bluff as requested by the
applicant with the following finds of fact:
1. The neighborhood was platted prior to the enactment of a Shoreland
Management Ordinance.
2. Grading of neighborhood for residential development altered the natural
character of the bluff.
3. Similar circumstances exist for a large percentage of the homes along the
north side of Denbigh Road that are also built on the bluff.
4. Granting the variance would not detriment the purposes of this Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Mound does
hereby approve the minor subdivision, a 6.2 side yard setback variance, and a variance
to allow building within a bluff as requested by the applicant with the following conditions:
1. The City does hereby approve the minor subdivision request with the
following conditions:
a. The lots have a non -lot of record status.
-6 ?2-
Resolution No. 05 -108
b. Drainage and utility easements be provided along side lot lines 5 feet
in width, rear lot lines 10 feet in width and front lot lines 10 feet in
width. The drainage and utility easement on the southwest property
line of Parcel C shall be to the maximum width possible but not
encompass the home.
c. The City Engineer review grading and drainage easements and plans
prior to building permit approval.
d. Retaining walls be provided if the slopes on the lots are greater than
3:1.
e. Hardcover be limited to 30 %. If pervious pavers are desired to meet
this requirement, the installation shall be by a commercial contractor.
As -built survey will be required to be submitted for all areas where
pervious paver products are used to certify that the installation was
done according to submitted specifications. The as -built survey shall
be required to be signed by professional engineer.
f. Installation of utilities prior to the issuance of building permit or
provide financial guarantee to cover the cost of utility service
connections prior to the release of the Resolution for recording.
g. Locations of water and sewer services to be approved by Mound
Public Works department.
h. Payment of sanitary sewer and watermain trunk charges of $1,500.00
each respectively for Parcel B.
i. Payment of sanitary sewer and water connection fees of $240.00
each respectively for Parcel B.
Plans be revised so driveways are at a minimum of 3% slope and
maximum of 9% slope.
k. Park dedication fee of $1,100.00 be paid prior to the release of the
Resolution for recording.
Payment of any City fees for review of the minor subdivision and
variance applications.
2. The minor subdivision and variance is approved for the legally described
property included on Exhibit A as stated in the Hennepin County Property
Information System.
-6943-
Resolution No. 05 -108
Adopted by the City Council this 26th day of July, 2005.
/s/ Bonnie Ritter
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
/s/ Pat Meisel
Mayor Pat Meisel
-694-
Resolution No. 05 -108
Exhibit "A"
Proposed Legal Descriptions:
Parcel A:
That part of Lot 7 and 8, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northeast
of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 7;
thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of said
Lots 7 and 8, a distance of 55.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be
described; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00
feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 8 and there terminating.
Parcel B:
That part of Lots 8 and 9, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as
follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 7 of Block 2; thence South 69
degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of said Lots 7, 8 and 9, a
distance of 55.00 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence
continuing along the last described course a distance of 55.00 feet; thence North 22
degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of
said Lot 9; thence North 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds East along the Northwest
line of said Lot 8 and 9, a distance of 55.00 feet to a point that bears North 22 degrees
18 minutes 03 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence South 22 degrees 18
minutes 03 seconds East a distance of 150.00 feet to the point of beginning and there
terminating.
Parcel C:
That part of Lots 9 and 10 , Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
Southwest of the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 7
of said Block 2; thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the
Southeast line of said Lots 7, 8 and 9 of said Block 2, a distance of 110.00 feet to the
point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03
seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest line of said Lot 9 and there
terminating.
-6965-
F,
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
If OF MOUND MOUND, MN 55364 -1687
PH: (952) 472 -0600
FAX: (952) 472 -0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
February 27, 2012
Steve Bedell .
4823 Bartlett Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
Re: Variance Application — 4568 Denbigh Road
Based on review of the variance application materials that were submitted on or around
February 6, 2012 for the property at 4568 Denbigh Road, Staff has deemed the
application to be complete.
With regard to the application, Staff respectfully offers the following additional
comments:
• The tentative Planning Commission date for review of the application is
Tuesday, March 6, 2012 at 7:00 PM. At this time, a Council meeting date
has not been determined but will be scheduled as §oon as possible following
Planning Commission review and recommendation.
• Additional comments from Staff, consultant and /or agency comments may
come up as part of the City's formal review of the application, including but
not limited to, preparation of the Planning Report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (952) 472 -0604 or by
email atSarahsmith@cityofmound.com. I will be happy to answer any questions you
may have.
Sincerel
GT�
Sarah J. Smith
Community Development Director
-696-
® printed on recycled paper
HARD COVER TABULATION:
PROPOSED HARDCOVER
House
1,772 Sq. Ft.
Entry stoop
56 Sq. Ft.
Entry walk
100 Sq. Ft.
30% of permeable paver drive
98 Sq. Ft.
Deck/steps with i" spacing
0 Sq. Ft.
Retaining walls
200 Sq. Ft.
TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 2,226 Sq. Ft.
AREA OF LOT TO OHW 7,948 Sq. Ft.
ALLOWABLE HARDCOVER 30% 2,384 Sq. Ft.
PAID
FEB INV
,ITY O F MOUND. i
/
/
/
/
/
/
t► / �• , �V,�Q /
/ / / „y 92e. /
•rC�R� 9 /
5etoft
suBrACSEmENT FAR AY r / tpuf (ONW) °"X928.4 929.3 / \
SMA IFARD ROAD PER,,-7,, g 4 c� 5 0 \
PLAT OF AVALOW r e °f buff - -j - 93930.4 \
�9 5g 93a5x __ x930.5
931.6 1� 69
2
r %
F _r. , A-11 ,
Y_ t - / i / \ 11 4 - X934.3
C
- - -'✓ �o i �• 10 x9 6' X(X \
4
- _X9317 � -934 `
10 FOOT rAsneNTS FAR �� 932.5 , - ' , , - -936\ i►, '
DRAINAGE AND UALITY -- 33.0 - - -- -- 8 "M Ems' -93 - X ���
8- -�-
PURPOSES AN ALL WES-'93y,3X 0 34.
OF LOT PER RE=uAAN 936 3 7 - _ _ _ _ , - 93 -i4i '
0 93M4 _ - - - -- 94 - -�-942\
-94' 6 ��
937. 4-
939. 2
941. P _ _ _ - X9�$ 949. \ N
940.1 - "M - -9 4 i 50.6' 0 r �.
\ - sn 6• \P
' 942. ,�
942. �.� c - - 949.8 , , 54.2
�- -- -944.3 1 - - - -- n� 949yZg5 �_ - - - -��
6 -'tv - - -�
�c., o �qc jX956.2
949.4 N O w C� X964 ��96e 7
_' Q 6 �, �"� �► S \ ,' �' 960. - ' '
_� •O / "� d 952 4 �' ,' 957.6 988.3�
------ -`•Z•\ `•°rr 968.8 ° *ice - ox
41W //k �i w �r`� aO 4� 9700 gat
953.5 X g
954.5X
- - - 955.6
x,-
955.7
JW-
- - $ V6 to 989. Svc
959.6 96� � 96� � � ° � � - � 5, ° I � � ' Ex'St•
961.0X, G g.q
SCALE � '� V i
96_3._9_ x463.5 �, .+� 3 y� ighi �X 70.6
20 40 96� o " er,�
e "4 g 0th ID / °f m
SET SVC
/
Exist' S /
/
/ Drw. No. 120019 PR(
MKO
v
ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO.
5300 S. Hwy. No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 Fax (952) 225 0502 www.advsurcom
SURVEY FOR: STEVE BEDELL
SURVEYED: March, 2004 DRAFTED: March 18, 2004
REVISED: April 4, 2004 to add additional items per City of Mound.
REVISED: January 31, 2012 to show topo on west parcel PA, i
REVISED: February 1, 2012 to reduce deck size to meet 6 foot setback.
REVISED: February 15, 2012 to add note about entire lot is a bluff.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I T
That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block 2, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Southwest of
the following described line: Commencing at the Southeast comer of Lot 7 of said Block 2;
thence South 69 degrees 49 minutes 59 seconds West along the Southeast line of Lots 7, 8, and
9 of said Block 2, a distance of 110.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described;
thence North 22 degrees 18 minutes 03 seconds West a distance of 150.00 feet to the Northwest
line of said Lot 9 and there terminating and that part of undeveloped Stratford Road which lies
between the extensions of the above described parcel.
Contains 7,948 Sq. Ft.
SCOPE OF WORK_
1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The
scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter.
Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel,
if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements,
that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown
2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important.
3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the corners of the property.
4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography
of the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that
benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the map when determining other
elevations for use on this site.
5. Showing and tabulating hard cover and area of the lot for your review and for the review of
such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over hard cover requirements.
6. The hardcover shown on the survey is only what we could see that was not covered by snow.
7. Existing utilities shown hereon are from City as -built maps and are not field located.
8. While we have shown a proposed dwelling, related improvements and grading, please review
them to make sure we have shown them as you intend and show them to such governmental
agencies as may have jurisdiction over your project to gain their approval, if you can, before
making any decisions.
9. The entire lot is a bluff.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
" • " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State License Number 9235, set, unless
otherwise shown.
CERTIFICATION:
I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and
Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
am H. Parker P.E. & P.S. No. 9235
HARD COVER TABULATIO
PROPOSED HARDCOVER
House
Entry stoop
Entry walk
30% of permeable paver drive
Deck/steps with t" spacing
Retaining walls
TOTAL PROPOSED HARDC
AREA OF LOT TO OHW
ALLOWABLE HARDCOVEF
Ilk
FP- , It �01L
CITE( rJa- MOUND-
SUBJECT 70 ROADWAY /
£ASWENT FOR
SIRATFORD ROAD P£R,r__
PLAT OF AVALON
FOOW
.� 4
to FOOT EASEMENTS Fm `
DRAINAGE AND u7KITY
PMWOSES GW ALL STDES- 93y
OF LOT PER kimunav 93a
939.
941:
GRAPHIC SCALE
Ell
■
(m FEET )
9+�
R TABULATION PARCEL A: LEGEND:
ARDCOVER
848 Sq. Ft.
707 Sq. Ft.
TING HARDCOVER 1,555 Sq. Ft.
IT TO OHW
DER
8,184 Sq. Ft.
19%
R TABULATION PARCEL B:
ARDCOVER
Is
1 00 1 • /
T TO OHW
'ER
70 Sq. Ft.
884 Sq. Ft.
502 Sq. Ft.
1,456 Sq. Ft.
8,250 Sq. Ft.
18%
R TABULATION PARCEL C:
kRDCOVER
757 Sq. Ft.
200 Sq. Ft.
Is and Wood Steps 316 Sq. Ft.
ay 938 Sq. Ft.
LING HARDCOVER 2,211 Sq. Ft.
ER
7,402 Sq. Ft.
_ 1" 939.7 w - -
R,or 1433�rY -S ,
foe
---- -_ - - -- Denotes existing contour line
0 Denotes proposed spot elevation
Denotes proposed contour line
Denotes proposed direction of storm water flow
Denotes proposed silt screen
Se
toll
9�� W
S 6955.
\ 33.0 \ "
9�.5 0 ��
\ b
.Q N
\ Oy0 \
i
949.7 \ 10
pe�K
\ 30.
\ 951
3'8 tc
f \
O SUf .
C \
19
962.8\
1
\g
rn
as66.7
CD
nriAl Aln
ririel
ha » w
C •9'59
S 69 55•
fence per City specs
/
/
/
T
�1; 5 ,( W
69-49 Egst' si
rW /
� X- .. _ 6s.7 sue s
X1 S
V
t o 68.7 1 �„�W �. /
_ 5' 959 i
e w9q.9 /
6
/S � h 970.5 k.
W btig h
i3enc
S 69 T°P °f
/
/
/
1
Hosington Koegler Group, Inc
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director and Rita Trapp, HKGi Consultant
Planner
DATE: March 7, 2012
SUBJECT: Modification to Retail Definition in City Code Section 129 -2
Summary. In accordance with the provisions of City Code Chapter 129 -34, the City Council will
hold a public hearing for review of a proposed amendment to City Code Chapter 129 to
consider amending the definition of "retail."
Background. As directed by the City Council at its December 10, 2011 meeting, Staff has
prepared a proposed ordinance to modify the retail definition Section 129 -2 of the City Code
(zoning ordinance.) The intent of the modification is to ensure that it is clear that secondhand
good stores qualify as a retail store and that they should be permitted in the same districts
where other retail establishments are allowed. Members may recall that the retail definition
was recently discussed by the Planning Commission and City Council as part of a retail zoning
study undertaken by the City. The study found that most communities allow secondhand good
stores in their general retail areas and under the retail definition. Communities have a variety of
definitions of retail. A few examples of other communities' retail definitions include:
• Maple Grove — Retail sales means a business having as its primary function the supply of
merchandise or wares to the end consumer. Such sales constitute the primary function
of the business when such sales equal at least 80 percent of the gross sales of the
business.
• Roseville - Retail, general and personal services includes the retail sale of products
and /or consumer services to the general public and produces minimal off -site impacts.
• St. Louis Park
o . Retail means a facility where merchandise or equipment is displayed and rented
or sold and where delivery of merchandise or equipment to the ultimate
consumer is made. This use includes limited production, repair or processing as
an accessory use. Hours of operation generally begin after the a.m. peak traffic
period and extend to time ranges from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; although some
-700-
convenience stores and grocery stores are open 24 hours per day. Characteristics
generally include high parking demand and high off -peak traffic generation;
generally prefers high visibility and access to major thoroughfares. This use
includes but is not limited to camera shops, clothing stores, department stores,
grocery stores, discount stores, jewelry stores, delicatessens, retail bakeries, toy
stores; but excludes restaurants, bars, pawn shops, motor vehicle sales, motor
fuel stations, and large item retail.
o (29.1) Retail, large item means a facility where large item merchandise or
equipment is displayed and rented or sold and where delivery of merchandise or
equipment to the ultimate customer is made. Characteristics generally include
hours of operation between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. weekdays and weekends.
The parking demand per square foot of building area is normally less than the
demand for general retail. This use includes but is not limited to, furniture
stores, carpet stores, large appliance stores; but excludes motor vehicle sales,
pawnshops, and retail.
Planning Commission Review and Recommendation. At its February 21, 2012 meeting, the
Planning Commission reviewed and discussed the proposed ordinance modification that was
prepared by Staff:
Retail business means stores and shops buying and selling household goods directly
from the general public.
Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council
approval of the amendment subject to some the modifications that are highlighted below:
Retail business means stores and shops buying and selling household goods directly
from the general public.
A copy of the minute excerpts from the February 21, 2012 Planning Commission meeting have
been included.
Action Requested. Council approval of the proposed draft ordinance is requested.
-701-
CITY OF MOUND
ORDINANCE NO. -2012
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE
AS IT RELATES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
The City of Mound does ordain:
That Section 129 -2, Definitions, be amended to read as follows:
Retail business means stores and shops buying and selling household goods directly from and to the
general public.
Passed by the City Council this 13th day of March, 2012.
Mayor Mark Hanus
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
Published in The Laker the _ day of , 2012.
Effective the _ day of , 2012.
-702-
MINUTE EXCERPTS
MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 21, 2012
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas
Gawtry (7:07), David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Pete Wiechert, and
Councilmember Ray Salazar. Absent: Kelvin Retterath. Staff present: Community
Development Director Sarah Smith.
Others present: Bryan Pellowski, 6133 Blue Circle Drive, # 150, Minnetonka; Sue Cross,
6133 Blue Circle Drive, # 150, Minnetonka; Rob Winkler, 5001 Wilshire Boulevard; John
Sobraski, 5009 Wilshire Boulevard; Jen Berrett
Review /Discussion /Action - Retail Definition Ordinance Amendment
The proposed amendment is to ensure that it is clear that a secondhand good store
qualify as a retail store and that they should be permitted in the same districts where
other retail establishments are allowed.
Ward likes it for its simplicity. He suggested adding the word "to" after the word "from"
to read "buying and selling household goods directly from and to the general public ".
MOTION by Linkert, second by Goode, to recommend City Council approve the
amendment with amended wording. MOTION carried unanimously.
-703-
NOTICE OF A CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT
RELATES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in
the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 13, 2012 to hold
a public hearing to consider amendment(s) to City Code Section 129 (Zoning Ordinance) to
revise the definition of "retail ".
A copy of the proposed ordinance amendment is available to the public upon request at City
Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the
opportunity to be heard at this meeting.
Published in the Laker on March 3, 2012
-704-
Jill Norlander, Planning and
Inspections Secretary
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: March 8, 2012
SUBJECT: Variance request for modifications to identification sign at Mound Marketplace
Shopping Center
OWNER /APPLICANT: Mound Marketplace LLC
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 11 -11
LOCATION: Mound Visions 2 "d Addition
ZONING: Destination Planned Development District
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Auto Destination District
Summary. Mound Marketplace LLC has submitted a request to allow for modifications to
Resolution No. 03 -12 that approved a variance, subject to conditions, for the 25 -foot area
identification sign at Mound Marketplace shopping center located near the north entrance
along the west side of Commerce Boulevard /CSAH 110. The purpose for the request is to add
an additional tenant board for H &R Block that is proposed to be installed below the existing
tenant space and to incorporate the use of color. Members are advised that the approved
resolution required the use of reverse cut copy (white letters on a black and /or dark board) for
the tenant signage. Based on 2003 file information, the current sign area is 120 SF (Mound
Marketplace and tenant boards) which is the maximum allowed per code. The current
proposal adds 8 SF. Therefore, amendments to the variance are needed for the proposed
modifications. Details regarding the request are contained in the Planning Report and the
application materials submitted by the applicant which have been included as attachments.
Planning Commission Meeting Overview and Recommendation. Staff provided an overview
of the request and explained that its recommendation supported the additional tenant board
for H &R Block but did not support changing the current condition in the approved resolution
that requires reverse cut copy with (white letters on a black or dark board). Bryan Pellowski
and Sue Cross from PBK /Mound Marketplace were present at the meeting. Mr. Pellowski
commented that the use of color will not have a negative impact and that it is in the best
interest of the center and the City. Discussion took place about the pros and cons of
incorporating color into the sign and that there are businesses signs along Commerce that
-705-
include color. Based on its review, a majority of members of the Planning Commission voted to
recommend that the variance be amended to allow the requested modifications to the Mound
Marketplace identification sign to include the additional tenant board for H &R Block and to
allow the use of color. Members Linkert and Salazar voted in opposition. Details regarding the
Planning Commission's review are included in the February 21, 2012 meeting minute excerpts
(draft) that have been provided. Due to differing recommendations from Staff and the Planning
Commission, a resolution has not be prepared in advance of the meeting but would.be brought
back to a subsequent meeting based on the Council's action.
-706-
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff
FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
DATE: February 17, 2012
MEETING DATE: February 21, 2012
SUBJECT: Variance request for modifications to identification sign at Mound Marketplace
Shopping Center
OWNER /APPLICANT: Mound Marketplace LLC
PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 11 -11
LOCATION: Mound Visions 2nd Addition
ZONING: Destination Planned Development District
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Auto Destination District
SUMMARY
Mound Marketplace LLC has submitted a request to allow for modifications to Resolution No.
03 -12 that approved a variance, subject to conditions, for the 25 -foot area identification sign at
Mound Marketplace shopping center located near the north entrance along the west side of
Commerce Boulevard /CSAH 110. The purpose for the request is to add an additional tenant
board for H &R Block that is proposed to be installed below the existing tenant space and to
incorporate the use of color. Members are advised that the approved resolution required the
use of reverse cut copy (white letters on a black and /or dark board) for the tenant signage.
Additionally, based on 2003 file information, the current sign area is 120 SF (Mound
Marketplace and tenant boards) which is the maximum allowed per code. The current
proposal adds 8 SF. Therefore, variance approval is needed for the proposed modifications.
DEPARTMENT REVIEW
Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City
departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been
summarized below:
City Manager Hanson My opinion is to follow suit with what is currently
on display.
-707-
City Engineer Faulkner No objection.
Public Works Director Moore No comments.
Public Works Superintent Fackler No comments.
Fire Chief Pederson No objections.
Acting Police Chief Mooney No objections.
Carolyn Fackler, Hennepin County Hennepin County does not have concerns
regarding the proposed changes for the static sign
as shown in the documents.
BACKGROUND /DISCUSSION /COMMENTS
• Staff deemed the use of the submitted survey /site plan and supporting materials
acceptable for land use review as the existing sign location is not changing. Applicant is
advised that the Planning Commission reserves the right to require the submittal of
additional information, as necessary including but not limited to, the submittal of an
updated survey and /or other related information.
• An amendment to the Development Plan for the Mound Marketplace/Village by the
Bay project approvals is not required for the proposed modification.
• Staffs understanding is that the request for color on the tenant board is to help
promote and market the center tenants especially for those with corporate or franchise
branding.
• The variance application was deemed to be complete on December 20, 2011. MS
15.99 requires applications to be approved or denied within 60 days unless an
extension is executed by the City. Members are advised that the City executed a 60 -day
extension for action on the application on February 8, 2012. Therefore, the current
deadline for approval or denial of the variance application is on or around April 18,
2012. Additional extensions beyond the 60 -day City extension must be provided by the
applicant
• Property owners that abut the subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning
Commission agenda on February 17, 2012 to inform them of the variance request.
• The tenant boards on the identification signs at Commerce Place and Stonegate
shopping centers are currently one color.
• As part of the request, graphics related to the incorporation of color for the sign have
been provided which also includes two options for the proposed H &R Block tenant
board (green and black backgrounds). The submitted options from the applicant have
been provided in b/w format in the agenda materials but have been included in color as
supplements to the packet.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Staff recommends approval of the request to allow for the
additional 8 SF tenant board on the existing sign at Mound Marketplace for H &R Block. In
offering a recommendation for approval, Staff offers the following:
- The inclusion of an additional tenant board is reasonable on the condition that its design
is same and similar as the existing tenant board.
- The proposed sign area for the tenant space is 78 SF-
- H &R Block moved into the center in 2005 which predates the 2003 approval of the
variance.
- The existing tenant board only accommodates six (6) tenants.
- The criteria in City Code Chapter 129.40 (a) (1), (3) and (4) are being met.
Staff recommends denial of the request to modify the variance condition which requires the
use of reverse cut copy (white letters on a black and /or dark board). In offering a
recommendation for denial, Staff offers the following:
The current sign has adequate visibility.
The use of reverse cut copy provides a uniform and clean appearance.
There are opportunities for use of color corporate signage for the tenants of Mound
Marketplace.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW. In the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made
at its February 21, 2012 meeting, the application will be forwarded to the City Council for
action an upcoming meeting. At this time, no date has been scheduled but possible dates are
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 or Tuesday, March 13, 2012.
-709-
Pkd /
VARIANCE cue; I 915 2011
v
APPLICATION f. u�
5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364
Phone 952.472 -0600 FAX 952472-0620
Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application.
Planning Commission Date December6, 2011 Case No.
City Council Date December 27, 2011
Please type or arint leaibly
SUBJECT
Address 2125 Commerce
Blvd.
PROPERTY
Lot
Block
LEGAL
DESC.
Subdivision CIC No.
1098 Mound Marketplace /A Planned Unit Dev.
PID # 14-17-24-41-0088 Zoning: R1 R1 A R2 R3 61 B2 B3 (Crde one)
PROPERTY
Name Mound Marketplace
Email pbkCpbkinvest.com
OWNER
Address 6133 Blue
Circle Drive #150, Minnetonka,MN 55353
Phone Home
Work 952- 857 -2590 Fax 952 - 857 -2595
APPLICANT
Name
Email
(IF OTHER
Address
THAN
OWNER) .
Phone Home
Work Fax
1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure
for this property? Yes (k ) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution numbers)
and provide copies of resolutions.
2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.):
Would like to change sian letterina from black and white to color
Tenants woul.d also be able to use their logos
Variance Information
(112=010) Page 4 of 6
- 710 -i-
Case No. i k
3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning
d istrict in which it is located? Yes ( )0 No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason
for variance request, i.e, setback, lot area, etc.):
SETBACKS:
Front Yard:
(NSEW)
Side Yard:
(NSEW)
Side Yana:
( N S E W )
Rear Yard:
(NSEW)
Lakeside:
( N S E W )
:
(NSEW)
Street Frontage:
Lot Size:
Hardcover:
REQUIRED
ft:
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
fL
fL
sq ft
sq ft
REQUESTED
(or e)isting)
ft
ft.
ft.
fL
ft.
ft.
ft.
sq ft
sq ft
VARIANCE
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft.
ft.
ft.
sq ft
sq ft
4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is
located? Yes (x), No ( . ). If no, specify each non - conforming use:
5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the
uses permitted in that zoning district?
( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil
{ ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation
{ ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify
Please describe: nt/ A
Variance Infomnation
(1/20/2010) Page 5 of 6 - 711 -7-
Case No. I 1 - I 1
6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land
after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No ( ). if yes, explain:
7. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the relocation of a road?
Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain:
8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in,
this petition? Yes ( ), No (K ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected?
9. Comments:
I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be
submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information
provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized
official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such
notices as maybe required bylaw.
Ile U.j
Owrnees Signature -_2.
Data
Applicant's Signature Date
Variance Information
(1120/2010) Page 6 of 6 -712-1-
-713-
Z
L3
O
O
_r
y
3
•
V3
C7
^ ut i m
y1••�I c
r $
F
qq
pp
o
pap
Q $ J
maw
-713-
Z
L3
O
REDUCED - NOT TO SCAI
O
_r
y
REDUCED - NOT TO SCAI
O
n
y
3
•
V3
F
REDUCED - NOT TO SCAI
REDUCED - NOT TO SCALE
.� ..
ill I
oil
C 110
■� NfliGJiri.:ai.
- �r�jnm�nn �mnn�
� 1.1 b Lr- W
J
LHB +Madson
730 -3dA— No* W WAM
I
Z. alb
A
F
� a
I °
I u
p A
Aa
V Of
all
I
—Yl♦
i
I- I
M ruuc party
B. Tot Lott Public park
b C
C. 59 Townhomes
H: s B
Buildings 12,5,6 and 7.3 story, 4 unit
e B
Bung 3.3 story, 5 unit
R B
Building 4 = 2 story, 3 unit
Buildings 8,9,10 and 11 = 2 story,6 unit
Building 12 = 2 story, 7 unit
. r P
P,,tl D
D. 40 Flats
Buildings 13 and 14 = 3 story, 20 unit
E. Gubhouse
F. 8' Situmrwus Path
G. Pond for residential and oornendal storm water
e-+ H
H. 26, 375 sI Commardal -see building plans
9 t
t. 36,625 s.f. Commerdal -see building plans
J. 4,000 s.f. Cor menpalsee building plans
K Piaza -see landscape plans
a L
L. 311 Packing Spaces
«e z a
- - -- -
aSe— - -_ —_ — .--- - - - - -_ —_.
N. Entrance
O. Existing Ice Hera
cc P
P. Paddng Lot (44 spaces)
O. Guest Pwiring (39 spaces)
CD
t M
Mm DW—ia m b ba d oA Vi= rabd dM� 1
ill I
oil
C 110
■� NfliGJiri.:ai.
- �r�jnm�nn �mnn�
� 1.1 b Lr- W
J
LHB +Madson
730 -3dA— No* W WAM
I
Z. alb
A
F
� a
I °
I u
p A
Aa
V Of
all
I
—Yl♦
i
I- I
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION # 03 -12
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A HEIGHT VARIANCE TO ALLOW
INSTALLATION OF AN AREA IDENTIFICATION SIGN AT MOUND
MARKETPLACE
PID: 14-117-24-44-0067
P & Z CASE # 02-41
WHEREAS, the applicant, Mound Marketplace has requested a variance to allow
construction of a (25) foot area identification sign near the north entrance located
along the west side of Commerce Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, area identification signs are limited to no more than (15) feet in the
B -1 Business District; and
WHEREAS, the preliminary plat approval for Mound Visions 2 "d Addition included
a provision which referenced the removal of the clock tower that was planned for
the Lynwood Boulevard / Commerce Boulevard intersection to allow for alternate
improvements in this area including a water feature; and
WHEREAS, the final plat approval for Mound Visions 2nd Addition included the
� proposed location of the sign which meets the location requirements of the B -1
District; and
WHEREAS, the proposed height of the area identification sign is similar to that of
the new commercial buildings in the Mound Marketplace complex; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance request at its
January 6, 2003 meeting and recommended approval of the request subject to
conditions.
1. The height of the area identification sign shall be reduced from (25)
feet to (20) feet.
2. Reverse cut copy (white letters on a black and /or dark board) shall
be used for the tenant signage.
3. The building permit for the new sign shall not be issued until the
variance resolution is recorded at Hennepin County.
4. The variance shall expire after one (1) year unless an extension is
granted pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:530, Subd. 2 (E.)
5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated
with the City's review of the land use request.
- 716 -.'-
Resolutlon No. 03-12
6. The sign materials shall be architecturally compatible with the
materials used in the Mound Marketplace project.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Mound, Minnesota, to approve the variance request subject to the following
conditions:
1. The height of the area identification sign is allowed at 25 feet.
2. Reverse cut copy (white letters on a black and /or dark board) shall be
used for the tenant signage.
3. The building permit for the new sign shall not be issued until the
variance resolution is recorded at Hennepin County.
4. The variance shall expire after one (1) year unless an extension is
granted pursuant to City Code Chapter 250.530, Subd. 2(E).
5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with
the City's review of the land use request.
6. The sign material shall be architecturally compatible with the materials
used in the Mound Marketplace project
7. This variance is approved for the following legally described property
as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System:
Lot 1, Block 1, Mound Visions 2nd Addition
The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Osmek and seconded
by Councilmember Hanus.
The following voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel and Osmek.
The following voted in the negative: Meyer.
Adopted by the City Council this 10 day of January, 2003.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
- 717 -3-
Mayor Pat Meisel
Z
m
90
Cl)
(A
Qp
3
I
O
O
U)
Q)
O
z
U)
Q)
z
O
O
m
C)
z
I
i
Ln
--4
O
O
O
U)
Q)
O
z
U)
Q)
z
O
O
m
C)
z
I
i
OD
Ln
--4
m
PO
Cl
rat
r
am
2
_7 :Z
INS,
70
LACI
to
. . . . . .
r7
;v =Qj
co tl
T
OD
o
%mm
Ic
z
m
cn
0
90
01
cn
�p
6
•
0
Z--
4�
-1
O
m
O
C)
Z
A 'X i M'
CD
PO
4
--1
CD
;m
m
rm
t/I
co
70
r"
'o
C:: ;
C)
IT
-0
70
0
�a
= .
Z!,' -.2
CIL
C)
p
IS-,
Z
n o c m
o
r7 O
r7 o
12
r.
z
E� A Sz Z
"I ,, -" -0
-3 - -
-Inl
rr
f-r
4
--1
M
;m
co
70
r"
'o
70
N
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472 -0604
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Date: 3/9/2012
Re: Policy on Use of Chapter 429 for Private Developer Projects
Summary. For review and consideration by the City Council, Staff has prepared a proposed
policy (draft) regarding the City's use of Chapter 429 financing for private development projects.
As the Council may recall, the development of this policy was discussed and requested as part of
the Council's 2/14 discussion regarding the request from JMS /Hartman Enterprises to consider
using 429 financing for the infrastructure improvements in Woodlyn Ridge.
Members are advised that Staff contacted several communities regarding available policies for
use of 429. for private developer projects and found that many cities use Chapter 429 for private
projects but don't have an established policy. It was mentioned by a few cities that they
followed the procedures in state statute and /or the guidelines contained in the League of
Minnesota Cities Local Improvement Guide. The City of Woodbury has provisions in their
Special Assessment Policy about using Chapter 429 to finance private developments and a copy
has been forwarded and is currently under Staff review. A copy of the draft policy has been
forwarded to Ehlers, the City's financial consultant, and Mary Ipple, the City's bond counsel for
review and comment. Staff will provide further comment at the meeting.
-720-
DRAFT
City of Mound
Policy on Use of Chapter 429 for Private Developer Projects
March , 2012
This Policy is intended for situations in which land is being subdivided; and the
subdivision will require the construction of public improvements:
1. The City's preference is to have the developer construct and pay for all needed public
improvements; the City would construct and assess only if:
(i) It concluded there were exceptional circumstances which rendered developer -
construction not feasible; and
(ii) The City was satisfied that it had no risk that any part of the cost could become
the responsibility of the City taxpayers.
The City retains the right to refuse to finance the cost of public improvements in new
subdivisions for any reason.
2. The City will make a clear distinction between private developer projects and City driven
projects, including, but not limited to:
(i) 100% of the improvement costs and related expenses for the "new" infrastructure
would be specially assessed against the lots in the subdivision, vs. 2/3 of related
costs for City driven street "improvement/reconstruction" projects.
(ii) Separate public hearing (can be on same night as Street Improvement Project)
(iii) Separate project billed by engineers, legal, bond consultants, etc.
(iv) Can bid with Street Improvement Project/same vendor but costs separated
(v) Separate filing and certification of assessments, etc.
(vi) Assessments will be certified in same year of project,
3. The developer would provide the City with a petition and waiver agreement wherein (in
addition to other terms) it agrees to a specified amount of cost, requests the 100%
assessment, and waives all rights to challenge or contest the assessment.
4. The assessment would have a rate of 5% or two percentage points above the bond rate,
whichever is greater.
5. The assessments against individual lots would be required to be paid in full upon sale of
the lot.
6. The term of the assessments and the term of the bonds would be in the discretion of the
City, but would be for the shortest feasible term, in the judgment of the City.
-721-
7. Letter of Credit:
(i) The developer would be required to provide a letter of credit which
would be equal in amount to 125% of debt service payments on
the bonds (including all issuance costs.)
(ii) The letter of credit would be drawn upon if there were not
sufficient funds from special assessments to make a debt service
payment on the bonds when due and payable.
(iii) The letter of credit would be from a state or federally chartered
bank which is a participant in the FDIC insurance program, and is
not the subject of any watch or enforcement action by any bank
regulatory agency. The letter of credit would be from a Minnesota
or federally chartered bank which is a participant in the FDIC
insurance program, and is not the subject of any watch or
enforcement action by any bank regulatory agency. The state or
federal chartered bank must have a location in the metropolitan
area at which the letter of credit can be presented and paid.
(iv) The letter of credit will be reduced from time to time to reflect
prepayments and annual installments made on the special
assessment.
(v) The letter of credit would be subject to such terms and conditions
as are reasonably necessary, in the judgment of the city, to assure
that it will be available for use for the intended purposes.
8. The construction of the public improvements and the making of the special assessments
would, unless otherwise agreed by the city and the developer, be subject to all of the
normal requirements applicable to 429 projects, including, without limitation, all design,
bidding, contracting, inspection, acceptance and assessment.
9. The developer would be required to waive and release the City from any claims caused
by any delay in the developer's development project by or related to the timing of
construction or completion of the public improvements.
-722-
Y
� AD
/ 5341 MAYWOOD RO
■ OF MOUND MOUND, MN 55364 -1687
PH: (952) 472 -0600
FAX: (952) 472 -0620
WEB: www.cityofmound.com
March 7, 2012
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bonnie Ritter �Q
RE: Establishing Precincts and Polling Places Following Redistricting
Cities have until April 3, 2012 to submit resolutions either establishing (or reestablishing if no
changes) our voting precincts. This follows the February 21 st deadline of legislative redistricting.
The impact of the redistricting to the City of Mound was minimal in that we remain undivided,
and remain in U.S. House District 3 and MN Senate District 33. We did, however, change from
MN House District 33A to 33B.
Through numerous training sessions with the Secretary of State's Office and Hennepin County,
I have come up with a plan that realigns our precincts, and reduces our number of precincts
from 5 to 4. This plan satisfied state statutes regarding qualified polling places and precinct
balance. Following redistricting, voters in Mound will receive notification (at Hennepin County's
expense) of their districts, precincts, and polling place location via mail. There has been, and
continues to be media attention on the redistricting process, making voters aware that there
may be changes that affect them, so I feel strongly that now is the time to make our changes.
Also, by making the change at this time, not only are we saving the cost of notification by mail to
all of our registered voters, but also will realize savings by needing fewer election judges, having
less machine maintenance costs, and less set -up /take down time.
The proposed plan for precinct re- alignment is as shown on the attached map. For comparison
purposes, I have also included a map showing the precincts as they are now.
The reduction from 5 to 4 precincts would allow the elimination of the Hennepin County Library
as a polling place. The only room that they have available for us to use is very, very small and
is not adequate to accommodate the number of voters in that precinct.
The other polling place change proposed is to replace City Hall as a polling place for Precinct 3,
with St. John's Church. Their fellowship hall along with the parking and accessibility meets the
qualifications and is very adequate to handle the number of voters in that precinct. The Council
Chambers is adequate, but the parking is not.
My job is to make recommendations for what I believe is the best plan to administer the election
process in a legal and proficient manner. Mound has been cited as a model by Hennepin
County for our election process, and it is my goal to continue this standard.
-723-
® printed on recycled paper
n
2
U �
m A,
tr �
O
m4
�
County Rd 15 0'
Woodedge
od G\
Ghetto \o���`
yea
Co�nry Ra
z. 7 i
ro
0
ea
a
PROPOSED PLAN — PRECINCT CONFIGURATION
WITH PROPOSED POLLING PLACE LOCATIONS
ur�Ore 0 a al!-� i
r r Q Z
Minnetrista d`o° f�a�ccaacaraataa e D BaraUrpar
il It b
m Q 3 k Ra
Game Fa <M z�cckrraa+cl"► a5 3 0 37 &5t� Cherry Ave
O d
i 173 24 13 16 f Qo� °�E�
DS 65 .ci 13 20 46 p mess d
13 24 40 e
'ECa(a((a`acc(�caeaccccc 68 46,c4 94 19 23 21 Qesrt aa 4c Orono Fag
aaacaaaa A23 9 Ot
�cc�Ta 0 Grandview Blv °-
d 0 N' 1141, `am A
i 98,�� 414 4204 ° ° BuddLn .a
p 27 179
4
€19 0 �� ill 0 0 C? Dickson.Ave Exd
33 36 58 gq 0 ®X 1 e 9 Ofn tw(,
n ; ^ 65 6 s� Togo Rd
9881 �o d7 aria tice i7 22 14 1 47 44
129 407 m~2U o c 0 0 1 � cciiZittO; W Arm Rd se`' Northern P
Sugar MillLn� a E cccc«cc75 28 Spring Park �c Livingston
0 5
d ./' di m 21 514'7 54 r
{u t y Lafayette Ln Shoreline Dr on
P�eveua�p�aer o y -�� n \Rd '3
O a G 0 7" 28
0 13 26 0/ taaca�ia`
°fed 38 (" .ccaciaeci4 „aasa63�Fc m
4 93 se eiva 4 3s a 15 904 �B e�7- i�N�4 -aj, l b e8'�aa
i7 3b BeachwoodR3`� Mound 0 59 51
46 C
ccccc` itt 3ccccccccccc(E� r0 2 5ccc Casco Co
56 48 cccccc D i8 2�'c,��,W asco p Ai,e
4 �ccccc►4 ►► 9.Y+ fA 13 fi . l 1 16 18 193 �► ° nr {>'a
ccccac�5 4i 4i 7 14 S5 2778 20 406 `►(
ra ate` 46 52 a5 46 i4 y, �7 26 52
170 �� 4 . i� 129 34 3.1 0
32 �► G
54 u 409 ► ►► yoo
't 0 75 ►ct� 160 c 53 63 21 21 42 ►►► Ve
1k(aM (4ka`�`OtirseaT <S j J 35 20 57 ►c
�ag�a6 \o C Qeea((aeaae(�\�aaceeeae cP ` ►• 6 39 75 a 18 Zj 42 63 15 ► ► ►►
x c'
oG m 10 60 0 �° 57. ►►`
0 C ► ►►
'Qo-p 3 ��D �c. E���. c51a +�cc(t�a►satc <ec+scaaaeccacce((
a 3 2 arc F Shorewood
5G aeo 4+10,
District
Population
Deviation
% Deviation
Precinct 1
2158
-105
-4.6%
Precinct 2
2258
-5
- .2%
Precinct 3
2365
+102
+4.5%
Precinct 4
2271
+8
+ .4%
9052
-724-
CURRENT PRECINCT CONFIGURATION
pa -_z L - - - - - --
a g4uminnnmletQ > 3 Ba�a`r F
'4 co D
m F �� A e o
= eFer �� r ° o Cher
4 Gam 6not"nsillmnle 45 85 &' 3° "'Y Ave
° CC ` O N Shore Dr
F 37 °
ii
40 Orono S
[�v11�11V111n1'n11[1 4G �� St z 23 Xk Quay \FZ '^ Eaget�es da
tiutttft1� 1" iviewBIJI a m 4
¢� n
L'co 27 • e °e • • .7Cr$ 91 4►, c`P .Budd Ln
4P �f9 S ���.,Llbrlil^ (yj 4 24 Vo a
P1. 3 �-N ' Dickson-AA E
County Rd 15 : 33 3E, �9 R c >✓C I } .• 43rrs �°1
o m 8 97 °� 6 Togo Rd
tm c� az t4 4T 27 44 & Park Ln
328 oa 402 [R limil�188111a1811s�ftill o1e[11>'ail[�nu>fallrlo�nm ltaatulrpm�r�' Wq� Spring Park ti� " Northern
{ `� r he D� Lt Y; /:; 15 3 11 v Rd sY A D.:.,; JC`'e Nod Livi�,
Woodedge Fad >y1� �� Za t$ ce C � � 6
.. Shoreline Dr
�� b�CGS�o'i`t✓ �"V 135 g t� �, f��t� O
I
Wesfed8` Te S I�1i . I a vi [ b%Nii* a3 :i._ Si \w glord Rd9 94 Kildare K dar`relRd�ll+<�ilf :eP�'�jf w 4
93. pO 13 3 b
*i. Mound fl,`�:` ae so o ° ��,a G
n -a °O Beach woo a 59 bite : w
ee 3SJ �€ d Rd . 51 110S
r f3 e;
Che MNOOd J Qt A'�",4 48 1615 165 t, °`0�Q 1t 33 19 4. 0 26 13 w ': C cacao
, "a` :1 19 26 0 4 aSa °P eve
te\1.BI 4i P ���° d 12 1$ 193 e °jnrRa
Be 75 5 , 42 q4 aE q c� ° ° ° ° ° °° ti T 4214 2b 15 52 20 406
170 31 a m ° w 47 44 9 19 1.29 34 31
final Cove Dr o 7J ter_ °° 53 0 X,
c° 1am0 69 21 47.
24
�ir18a11Gi1t64a GC �{1�tFlfllri++ a° J 35 °0
etU X
09te ' iAffE1 1i11L/[il[1�F.F4llZi4I111ao �1!Sns''dm ®tee ° ° ° ®° & JA � 1$ Z�
e°
6 °
0
c<4 oe� +d iU L� �3
0
Ra44 rote G`t o, g`* jK �afllrlLllp l /rrt aJiar It lts u,cL I111$ 11140 1° °°
�ataS Minnetrista �m`� Fivsa17Ra 0 Shorewood
a 0-
District
Precinct 1
Population
Deviation
% Deviation
Precinct 2
904
2164
-906
354
- 50.06%
Precinct 3
2778
968
19.56%
Precinct 5
1615
-195
53.48%
- 10.77%
Precinct 6
1591
-219
- 12.10%
9052
-725-
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS
WHEREAS, the legislature of the State of Minnesota has been redistricted; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 402B. 14, subd. 3(d) requires that precinct boundaries
must be reestablished within 60 days of when the legislature has been redistricted or at least 19
weeks before the state primary election, whichever comes first;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, County of
Hennepin, State of Minnesota, hereby establishes the boundaries of the voting precincts as
follows:
Precinct 1
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Commerce Blvd. (C.R. #110) and Shoreline
Drive (C.R. #15) thence easterly along the centerline of Shoreline Drive (C.R. #15) to its
intersection with the east municipal boundary line (center of Seton Channel Bridge), thence
southerly along the easterly municipal boundary line abutting Spring Park, thence easterly to its
intersection with the centerline of Wilshire Blvd (C.R. #125) then southerly and westerly along
said centerline to centerline of the Wilshire Bridge over Emerald Channel, thence southwesterly
through Cooks Bay to the south municipal boundary line, thence westerly along said south
boundary line to its intersection with the westerly municipal boundary, thence northerly along
said boundary to its intersection with the centerline of Bartlett Blvd. (C.R. #110), thence easterly
and northerly along said centerline to point of beginning.
Precinct 2
Beginning at the intersection of Shoreline Drive (C.R. #15) and Commerce Blvd. (C.R. #110)
thence north along said centerline to a point approximately 840 feet north of the centerline of
Three Points Blvd., said point also being the northern municipal boundary corner, thence
easterly and southerly along said municipal boundary to its intersection with the north municipal
boundary of Spring Park, thence east and southerly to its intersection with the centerline of
Shoreline Drive (C.R. #15) thence westerly along said centerline to point of beginning.
Precinct 3
Beginning at a point on the centerline of Wilshire Blvd. (C.R. #125) bridge over Emerald lake
Channel, thence easterly along said centerline to its intersection with the Mound northern
municipal boundary at the bridge over the Black Lake Channel, thence easterly and southerly
along said municipal boundary in Lake Minnetonka, thence westerly along said municipal
boundary to a point in Cooks Bay, thence northeasterly to point of beginning
-726-
Precinct 4
Beginning at a point on the centerline of Bartlett Blvd. (C.R. #110), approximately 150.09 feet
east of the centerline of Highview Lane, thence north along the east municipal boundary to the
northwesterly municipal corner in Dutch Lake, thence easterly along said municipal boundary
line to its intersection with the centerline of Commerce Blvd. (C.R. #110), thence south and
westerly along said centerline of C.R. #110 to point of beginning
Newly established precincts are also shown in Exhibit A, which hereto becomes a part of this
resolution.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of March, 2012.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-727-
Mayor Mark Hanus
EXHIBIT A
1�
° as
45 31
173 18 13 37 Lak innetonka West Arm
34 17 18
65 13 )0 20 46
11 1924 40
46 94 23 21 Orono
68 1g 9
Dutc 123 0 0
0
63 98 2164 91 1
4
27 0 179 71 43 70.3 44 15 PRECINCT2 20
19 3
1591 125 52 23 t1 21 0
33 36 58 84 56 1 42 1 89 6 racccc
8 37 41 22 14 44
17 cccccc„ 14 1 47 29
1 0 t) 24
28
aoz ccc o 16 78cccccc ° Spring Park
p 2 tc <<cccccccccOtcccccccccc75 28 19 11 Y 4
�I' P RE C I N CT4 ! 21 30 51 47 11 54 0°
zzs °
11 °
135 ° 0"
r-_... - -- i- - - - , 28 0 0 fyccac�cccp«cc
vv 33B ! 12 15 94 c a.«.a
0
9A.4 °
4 93 `�� 35 ' RECINCT1 26 50 °
Lake °
7 �� 0 51 aacccccccccc
30 26 a
46 13 61 �� jiiccccc scccc 41 0 ,"c 5
caceccccc166 33 c�19 ccccccc.2Gc�c 2b
56 49 ``a1.6'1.5
p 11 11 18 0 13
43 114 0 0 0 1 16 17 18 193
aaaaaaaaccccd 12
0 7 4 14 15 2778 20 t06
46 «ca 25 57 41 41 44 46 14 12
PREI.'ANI 3 °
17 32 54 0 47 3 40 0 .-- _ 21 __ —
0 75 160 535 83 24 21 42
20 57 .`
8 39 7 7 42 63 IS
18 2
23
10 60 0 51
43 0 0
Minnetrista
Halsted Bay
-728-
Bay
Shorewood
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLLING PLACES
WHEREAS, the legislature of the State of Minnesota has been redistricted; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute section 204B.14, sub. 3(d) requires that precinct boundaries
must be reestablished within 60 days of when the legislature has been redistricted or at least 19
weeks before the state primary election, whichever comes first; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did establish precinct boundaries by resolution on March 13, 2012;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, County of
Hennepin, State of Minnesota, hereby establishes the polling places for the established
precincts as follows:
Precinct 1 - Mt. Olive Church
5218 Bartlett Blvd.
Precinct 2 - Bethel United Methodist Church
2116 Commerce Blvd.
Precinct 3 - St. John's Lutheran Church
2451 Fairview Lane
Precinct 4 - The Gillespie Center
2590 Commerce Blvd.
Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of March, 2012.
Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk
-729-
Mayor Mark Hanus
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET REVENUE REPORT
FEB 2012
16.67%
FEB 2012 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED
GENERALFUND
Taxes
3,883,001
-
-
(3,883,001)
0.00%
Business Licenses
17,800
325
425
(17,375)
2.39%
Non - Business Licenses /Permit
126,100
2,651
9,333
(116,767)
7.40%
Intergovernmental
134,060
-
15,000
(119,060)
11.19%
Charges for Services
79,600
416
87,321
7,721
109.70%
Court Fines
55,000
6,208
6,868
(48,132)
12.49%
Street Lighting Fee
90,589
6,921
13,778
(76,811)
15.21%
Franchise Fees
397,000
10,365
10,365
(386,635)
2.61%
G.O. Equipment Certificates
122,400
-
-
(122,400)
0.00%
Charges to Other Dpts
12,000
(494)
401
(11,599)
3.34%
Park Dedication Fees
-
-
-
-
0.00%
Other Revenue
313,950
53,502
66,106
(247,844)
21.06%
TOTAL REVENUE
5,231,500
79,894
209,597
(5,021,903)
4.01%
FIRE FUND
1,063,688
155,961
197,944
(865,744)
18.61%
DOCK FUND
177,815
109,612
142,393
(35,422)
80.08%
MOUND HRA
-
-
348
348
#DIV /0!
WATER FUND
1,480,000
105,864
220,112
(1,259,888)
14.87%
SEWER FUND
1,494,250
151,739
271,853
(1,222,397)
18.19%
LIQUOR FUND
2,800,000
179,878
343,081
(2,456,919)
12.25%
RECYCLING FUND
225,276
15,380
29,944
(195,332)
13.29%
STORM WATER UTILITY
389,150
31,778
62,303
(326,847)
16.01%
INVESTMENTS (Net of Expense)
(59)
837
837
-730-
3/5/2012
CITY OF MOUND
BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT
Feb. 2012 16.67%
Feb. 2012 YTD PERCENT
BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED
GENERALFUND
Council
78,715
9,055
11,705
67,010
14.87%
Promotions
71,000
6,500
6,500
64,500
9.15%
City Manager /Clerk
315,006
23,616
44,783
270,223
14.22%
Elections
18,160
25
1,843
16,317
10.15%
Finance
310,222
22,499
42,274
267,948
13.63%
Assessing
95,600
2
4
95,596
0.00%
Legal
123,500
10,950
10,950
112,550
8.87%
City Hall Building & Srvcs
107,000
5,228
9,049
97,951
8.46%
Computer
43,540
3,238
9,650
33,890
22.16%
Police
1,885,438
153,249
278,485
1,606,953
14.77%
Emergency Prepardeness
8,150
(160)
593
7,557
7.28%
Planning /Inspections
308,092
19,366
36,658
271,434
11.90%
Streets
872,772
63,573
113,978
758,794
13.06%
Parks
514,760
38,735
53,992
460,768
10.49%
Park Dedication Fees
-
-
-
-
#DIV /0!
Cemetery
11,118
954
954
10,164
8.58%
Transfers
548,170
41,883
83,766
464,404
15.28%
Cable TV
47,492
-
-
47,492
0.00%
Contingencies
21,800
-
-
21,800
0.00%
GENERAL FUND TOTAL
5,380,535
398,713
705,184
4,675,351
13.11%
Area Fire Service Fund
1,063,688
114,760
161,613
902,075
15.19%
Dock Fund
153,862
10,368
26,356
127,506
17.13%
HRA Fund
50,800
2,370
4,568
46,232
8.99%
Capital Projects
1,500
20,078
20,078
(18,578)
TIF 1 -2 Downtown Mound
-
-
-
-
TIF 1 -3 MHR
-
-
-
-
Water Fund
1,643,216
269,412
299,428
1,343,788
18.22%
Sewer Fund
1,952,387
209,012
368,720
1,583,667
18.89%
Liquor Fund
619,212
41,837
65,347
553,865
10.55%
Recycling Fund
202,895
15,343
16,373
186,522
8.07%
Storm Water Utility
357,168
-731- 71,202
75,255
281,913
21.07%
City of Mound
Cash /Investments Balances by Fund
At the End of February 2012
FUND NAME $ Amount
General Fund
1,605,033
Park Dedication Fees
13,084
Area Fire Protection Services
322,246
Dock
284,548
Mound HRA
29,666
G.O. Equip. Certf. 2006 - C
-
G.O. Equip. Certf. 2007 - C
(255)
G.O. Equip. Certf. 2008 - D
(9,912)
G.O. Equip. Certf. 2009 - C
24,379
Mound Transit Center Series 2006
64,107
G.O. Bonds 2003 - C TIF 1 -2
343,657
G.O. Bonds 2005 - A
273,990
G.O. Bonds 2006 - A
291,837
G.O. Bonds 2007 - A
310,639
G.O. Bonds 2008 - B
242,483
G.O. Bonds 2009 - A
(78,361)
G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011 - A
(127,418)
G.O. Bonds 2011 - B
(84,432)
Taxable G.O. TIF Bonds 2008 A
101,586
HRA Lease Rev Bonds
(257,111)
Capital Improvement
745,837
MSA
665,918
Sealcoat 3,877
Downtown TIF 1 -2 63,910
Downtown TIF 1 -3 MHR 86,130
Water (254,014)
Sewer (408,462)
Liquor Store (281,709)
Recycling 24,561
Storm Water (406,658)
Total Cash 3,589,158 43,037
Note:
The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances
by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger.
The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers,
encumbered funds, or dedicated /reserved resources, etc.
Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be
distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included.
A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before
we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the
independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report
will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties.
In no way this schedule is intender► to represent balances of funds
available for spending. -732-
February 22, 2012
Jim Fackler
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Jim,
Thank you for your support and guidance over the past 10 -1/2 years. I truly have
enjoyed my employment with the City of Mound.
I will be resigning my position as Dock Program Administrator. If acceptable to you, I
will work in the present capacity through Friday, March 91h. I will then be on vacation
until March 23rd. My new position begins on Monday, March 26th with an anticipated
schedule of four days /week. If acceptable to you, I will try to assist with an easier
transition and work on an as- needed basis on that 5th day each week until my
assistance is no longer needed as determined by you.
wish you and the other staff the best and I thank you very much for the opportunity to
work with you at the City of Mound.
Resp ctfully,
Katie Hoff
-733-
March 5th, 2012
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Dear Catherine,
Please accept this letter as my notice of resignation. My final day of work with the City of Mound will be
Tuesday, March 20th. This was not an easy decision to make. I am eternally grateful for the amazing
friendships and experience I've gained while working here in Mound. I want to thank you especially for
all of your mentoring and willingness to expose me to so many facets of municipal government. Thank
you for your guidance; I truly appreciate all you've done for me and my career.
Sincerely,
Heidi M. Tumberg
-734 -
City of Mound
�► . � - Planning acid RLIddinp 1)viiar -hiio )t
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director
Date: March 13, 2012
Re: _Applicant request to table Council review and consideration of variance application
for modifications to area identification sign at Mound Marketplace
Summary
The variance application from Mound Marketplace for requested modifications to the area
identification sign is included on tonight's Council agenda. On March 9, 2012, Sue Cross
of Mound Marketplace LLC contacted Staff and explained that they would like the Council
to consider deferring its review of the application to its April 10, 2012 meeting to allow
Mound Marketplace LLC additional time to prepare additional information that they believe
is relevant to the Council's review of the request. On March 13, 2012, a formal written
request to table the application and applicant extension for an additional 60 days for Council
action as provided by MS 15.99, Subd. 3 (g) was received from Brian Pellowski on behalf of
Mound Marketplace LLC.
Recommendation
So as to allow provide additional time, which was requested by Mound Marketplace LLC, to
prepare additional information which the applicant feels will be relevant for the Council's
review of the request, Staff recommends the Council table its review and discussion of the
case to its April 10, 2012 City Council meeting. Members are advised that the applicant is
not planning to attend the meeting tonight.
March 13, 2012
City Council Meeting
RegularAgenda Item
Additional Information No. 7
March 13, 2012
Re: Applicant Extension —Mound Marketplace LLC
To the City of Mound:
This letter is in regard to MS 15.99, Subd 2 (a) and Subd 3 (f) related to the timelines for agency
approval or denial of the variance request from Mound Marketplace LLC to allow for sign
modifications at 2125 Commerce Boulevard that was deemed to be complete on December 20,
2011. Following execution of a 60 -day extension on February 8, 2012, the City's deadline for action
on the variance request is on or around April 18, 2012.
The Planning Commission reviewed the variance application at its February 21, 2012 meeting and
the application was included on the March 13, 2012 City Council meeting agenda for review and
consideration. MS 15.99, Subd 3(g) states that an applicant, by written notice, may request an
extension of the time limits under MS 15.99, Subd. 3.
On March 9, 2012, Mound Marketplace LLC requested that the City table its review of the
application to its April 10, 2012 meeting to allow Mound Marketplace LLC additional time to prepare
additional information that we believe is relevant to the Council's review of our request. it is
anticipated that, following the information provided at the April 10, 2012 meeting, a decision on the
variance might not occur until the April 24 council meeting. Therefore, on behalf of Mound
Marketplace LLC I am formally requesting the Council table the matter to its April 10, 2012 meeting
and am also providing the City of Mound with a written extension for Council action.
By signing and dating below, I, Bryan Pellowski, on behalf of Mound Marketplace, LLC, hereby extend
the deadline for agency action on the request for an additional 60 days beyond the current deadline,
as stated above, to accommodate the additional time that we have requested related to the
preparation of additional information and for the City to take action including, but not limited, to,
the pWaration "required docyments and adoption of a resolution.
0 &�
Bran Pellowski Date