The URL can be used to link to this page

2012-09-11 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, SEPT 11, 2012 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS * Consent Agenda Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. * Consent A eg nda *A. Approve payment of claims 2043 -2066 *B. Approve minutes: Aug 28, 2012 regular meeting 2067 -2073 • *C. Action on Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for the Property 2074 -2095 Located at 4606 Carlow Road *D. Approve Pay Request No. 4 from GHM Asphalt Corporation in the 2096 -2097 amount of $662,312.55, for work completed on the 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement Project, City Project Nos. PW- 12 -01, PW - 12 -03, PW -12 -04 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker) 6. Approve Resolutions Ordering Preparation of Report on 2013 Street, Utility and 2098 -2101 Retaining Wall Improvement Projects, City Project No. PW -13 -01 (SE Island Area) and PW -13 -02 (Three Points Boulevard) A. Action on Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report for the 2013 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — SE Island Area B. Action on Resolution Ordering Preparation of Report for the 2013 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard 7. 2013 Preliminary Budget and Levu Discussion and Ap royal A. Action on Resolution Authorizing Changes to the Debt Service Levy 2102 -2110 Schedules • B. Action to approve amendment to local program facilities agreement 2111 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. C. Action on Resolution to Approve the 2013 Preliminary General Fund 2112 -2113 Budget in the Amount of $4,972,144; Setting the Preliminary Levy at $5,548,708; and Approving the Preliminary Overall Budget for 2013 D. Action on Resolution Approving a Levy not to Exceed $191,194 for the 2114 Purpose of Defraying the Cost of Operation, Pursuant to the Provisions of MSA 469 of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound for the Year 2013 E. Mayor to make a public announcement stating the final budget and levy discussions and approval will take place at the regular December 11, 2012 Council Meeting, beginning at 7:00 pm. 8. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Planning Commission -July 17, 2012 2115 -2118 C. Reports: D. Correspondence: 9. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. • More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www.citvofinound.com COUNCIL BRIEFING September 11, 2012 • Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget! Sept 11 — 6:45 — HRA regular meeting Sept 11 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting (2013 Preliminary Budget Adoption) Sept 25 — 6:30 — HRA regular meeting Sept 25 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting Oct 6 —10:00 -1:00 -- Scarecrow Stomp Oct 9 — 6:30 — HRA regular meeting Oct 9 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting Oct 13 — 8:00 -12:00 — Recycling Day Oct 17 —1:30 -3:30 — Flu Shots Oct 23— 6:30 — HRA regular meeting Oct 23 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting Nov 2 — Seasonal Hours end Nov 4 - Daylight Saving Time ends Nov 6 — Election Day Nov 15 — 6:00 — Tree Lighting Ceremony City Hall Closings Nov 12 Veteran's Day observed Nov 22 -23 Thanksgiving Dec 24 Christmas Eve Dec 25 Christmas Day • City Official's Absences Sept 14 -16 Kandis Hanson Vacation Sept 21 -24 Kandis Hanson Vacation Oct 5 -11 Kandis Hanson City Manager's Conf & vacation Inquire in advance, please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision - making. You may email the relative department head and copy the City Manager to expedite the answers to your questions. f • City of Mound Claims as of 09 -11 -12 • YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2012 0830CITYMAN $ 4,259.21 2012 ELECTIONPRIM $ 3,143.00 2012 091112CITY $ 123,093.70 0 2012 091112HWS $ 92,606.62 2012 0911CITY2 $ 166,681.87 • TOTAL CLAIMS $ 389,784.40 2043 SAFINANCE DEPT\AP \CITY COUNCIL CLAIMS LISTING MOUND MN 08/30/12 4:00 PM Payments Page 1 • CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2012 Batch Name 0830CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $4,259.21 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $4,259.21 Refer 2 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 3790797 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 3790797 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 3790797 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells $0.00 In Balance NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 08 -20 -12 THRU 9- $320.27 20 -12 NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 08 -20 -12 THRU 9- $160.13 20 -12 NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 08 -20 -12 THRU 9- $160.13 20 -12 NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 08 -20 -12 THRU 9- $160.13 20 -12 Invoice 3790797 8/20/2012 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $800.66 Refer 3 HOME DEPOT /GECF (P/lM _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -223 Building Repair Supplies ELECTRICAL SHOP SUPPLIES -CONDUIT, $120.67 WALL PLATE, RECEPTACLE, ELBOWS, METAL PIPE, GANG BOX, POWER OUTLET, SCREW CONN. Invoice 2123471 7/26/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.67 Refer 7 MINNESOTA, UNIVERSITY OF Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -434 Conference & Training COMMUNITY FORESTRY WORKSHOP -TREE $50.00 INSPECTOR REGISTRATION B. SWARTZER Invoice 08302012 8/27/2012 PO 22875 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 8 RICE, JASON ..,...� ��v,.,W�,,,....�...,....�... ..,.�.�..�.�.,..��..<.. Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair REIMB J. RICE PURCHASE OF NEW $351.75 BATTERIES FOR'80 AERIAL LADDER TRUCK Invoice 08302012 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $351.75 Refer 9 ROCKYS HANDYMAN SERVICES L Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous MOWING SVC @ 5901 BARTLETT BLVD 7 -13- $53.44 12 Invoice 2011414 7/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous MOWING SVC @ 2500 COMMERCE BLVD 7 -2- $106.88 12 Invoice 2011 -410 7/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 2011 -411 7/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999430 Miscellaneous Invoice 2011 -412 7/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 2011 -413 7/23/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 2011 -426 8/14/2012 MOWING SVC @ 4869 HANOVER RD 7 -2 -12 $106.88 MOWING SVC @ 4539 ISLAND VIEW DR. 7 -2- $181.69 12 MOWING SVC @ 5025 SHORELINE DR. 7 -12- $106.88 12 MOWING SVC @ 4840 BEDFORD RD. 8 -6 -12 $106.88 2044 • • MOUND, MN 08/30/12 4:00 e 2 i Payments • CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2012 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $662.65 Refer 5 SPRINT WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -15 -12 THRU 8 -14- $319.92 12 PD Invoice 924573317 -129 8/18/2012 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $319.92 Refer 4 SPRINT WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -15 -12 THRU 8 -14- $522.98 12 PD Invoice 924573317 -129 8/18/2012 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $522.98 Refer 6 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY « Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -434 Conference & Training MCFOA ADVANCE ADADEMY $80.00 REGISTRATION B. RITTER SEPT 13 -14 Invoice MCFOA081512 8/15/2012 Transaction Date 8/30/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 1 VERIZON WIRELESS� >. � «. Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $34.26 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 • Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13- $1.48 2012 OVERAGE- PERSONAL USAGE CITY REIMBURSED Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $250.80 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $158.77 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $237.49 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $21.95 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $471.82 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $72.04 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 7 -14 THRU 8 -13 -2012 $101.97 Invoice 2786017246 8/13/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,350.58 • 2045 CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND MOUND, MN Payments 08/30/12 4:00 PM Page 3 Current Period: August 2012 10100 Wells Fargo $3,128.43 $613.85 $158.77 $358.16 $4,259.21 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $4,259.21 Total $4,259.21 • i s • 2046 CITY OF MOUND Batch Name ELECTIONPRIM Payment [TC�111►1��i�il►1 Payments 08/28/12 1:39 PM Page 1 Current Period: August 2012 Computer Dollar Amt $3,143.00 Posted Refer 4 ANDERSON, DOUG Ck# 041694 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION- HEAD JUDGE $153.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.00 Refer 14 DASCHER, SHARON Ck# 041695 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $76.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 24 FLEMING, DEAN Ck# 041696 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 16 GLISTER, BECKY � Ck# 041697 8128/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION - HEAD JUDGE $144.50 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 • Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.50 Refer 1 HAWKS, SHIRLEY � Ck# 041698 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $140.00 Invoice 08142012 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $140.00 Refer 29 HENDLEY, RON Ck# 041699 8/28/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $80.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $80.00 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 6 HEYSTEK, HENRI � � Ck# 041700 8/28/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $132.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $132.00 Refer 13 HYSJULIEN, NELLIE Ck# 041701 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $76.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 27 KOHLS, PATRICIA Ck# 041702 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $80.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 15 LAGOW, DEWAYNE Ck# 041703 8/28/2012 Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $132.00 . Cash Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $132.00 Refer 26 LAGOW, JOELLEN Ck# 041704 RnR /9012 2047 MOUND, MN 08/28/12 1:39 PM Payments Page 2 • CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $136.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $136.00 Refer 11 MCKENZIE, MARY D. Ck# 041705 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 22 MCKENZIE, SCOT Ck# 041706 8/28/2012 �« Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transa ction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 7 MELSNESS, LARRY Ck# 041707 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 28 MERCHANT, MARY _.. ., Ck# 041708 8/28/2012 µ Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $80.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 • Refer 17 MEYER, PETER m Ck# 041709 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $84.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84.00 Refer 5 NORBERG, DUANE Ck# 041710 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION - HEAD JUDGE $153.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.00 Refer 2 NORLANDER, JILL K � Ck# 041711 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION- HEAD JUDGE $153.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.00 Refer 12 OLSON, MARJORIE Ck# 041712 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 20 PHILLIPS MARYLAINE Ck# 041713 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $140.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $140.00 - y Refer 19 RANDALL, LELAND � Ck# 041714 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION - HEAD JUDGE $157.25 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 • Transact Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $157.25 Refer 18 RASMUSSEN, TOM Ck# 041715 8/28/2012 2048 MOUND, MN 08/28/12 1 :39 PM Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: August 2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION - HEAD JUDGE $157.25 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $157.25 Refer 8 RICE, DAVID Ck# 041716 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $76.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Refer 30 ROBERTS, COLLETTE Ck# 041717 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 10141410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $16.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total w $16.00 Refer 9 SCHMIDT, CONNIE Ck# 041718 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $112.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $112.00 Refer 3 SCHWALBE, VERNON Ck# 041719 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 10141410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION - HEAD JUDGE $153.00 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.00 Refer 21 SKARET, PATTY Ck# 041720 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 23 SOBRASKE, JOHN Ck# 041721 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 10 STADSKLEV, JOLEEN Ck# 041722 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $72.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 Refer 25 SULLIVAN, JAMES Ck# 041723 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -300 Professional Srvs PRIMARY ELECTION $136.00 Invoice 081412 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 8/24/2012 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $136.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $3,143.00 $3,143.00 • Pre- Written Check $3,143.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $3,143.00 2049 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 11:47 AM Page 1 f L Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Batch Name 091112CITY User Dollar Amt $123,093.70 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $123,093.70 $0.00 in Balance Refer 24 ALLIED WASTE _ Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -440 Other Contractual Servic AUGUST CITYWIDE RECYCLING SVC $12,991.77 Invoice 0894 - 002955281 8/25/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,991.77 Refer 25 ALLIED WASTE _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa SEPT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PUBLIC $98.04 WORKS Invoice 0894- 002958318 8/25/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa SEPT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PARKS $296.79 Invoice 0894 - 002956158 8/25/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa SEPT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE CITY HALL $102.32 Invoice 0894- 002955578 8/25/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa SEPT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PUB $98.37 SAFETY - POLICE Invoice 0894- 002958316 8/25/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa SEPT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PUB $98.37 SAFETY - FIRE Invoice 0894 - 002958316 8/25/2012 • Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $693.89 Refer � 21 KENO, LAWRENCE Cash Payment E 401 -43127 -500 Capital Outlay FA REIMB COST OF PART TO FIX INTERNAL $84.00 PLUMBING PROBLEM 2885 HIGHLAND BLVD. FROM PIN 11 -02 WATERMAIN IMPROV PROJ Invoice 09112012 9/4/2012 Project PW1102 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $84.00 Refer 1 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTR00 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $380.00 AUGUST 2012 Invoice W470198 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC AUGUST $380.00 2012 Invoice W470200 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) MOUND BAY PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $430.71 AUGUST 2012 Invoice W470199 8/22/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,190.71 Refer 8 BLUE LAGOON MARINE Cash Payment E 22242260 -409 Other Equipment Repair 2001 WOLF RESCUE FIREBOAT REPAIR $823.46 WARNING HORN & SVC CALL, REPLACE OIL TANK ASSEMBLY & SPARK PLUGS. FUEL TREATED W/ QUICKLEEN Invoice 2098491 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $823.46 • Refer 10 BOYD, ANTHON _ 2050 MOUND, MN 09/06/1211:47 AM Payments Page 2 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Invoice 29697 8/15/2012 2051 Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND OVERPAYMENT OF WATER BILL @ $180.84 4428 LAMBERTON Invoice 09112012 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.84 Refer 4 BOYER TRUCK PARTS _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts FRONT AXLE ALIGNMENT'09 FORD F550 $93.45 #209 Invoice 253040 8/22/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $93.45 Refer 2 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREN T Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -434 Conference & Training D. NICCUM MISSING & UNIDENTIFIED $125.00 PERSONS CONF OCT 10 & 11 2012 Invoice 09112012 8/27/2012 PO 24121 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 3 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/lM Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts HOSE CRIMP, HYD HOSE, VEHICLE #407 $36.57 Invoice 6974 - 188439 8/14/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts TARGET SAW BELTS CREDIT -$0.53 Invoice 6974 - 188010 8/8/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts TARGET SAW BELT $14.00 Invoice 6974 - 188012 8/8/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts GENERATOR FUEL FILTERS $23.00 Invoice 6974- 187517 8/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts LIFT STATION GENERATORS OIL FILTERS $5.30 Invoice 6974 - 187516 8/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts SEWER TRUCK #105 FUSE $6.71 Invoice 6974 - 188827 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SPARK PLUGS, EZ LUBE RUBBER CAP, $32.21 TRAILER DUST CAP, REFILL, JOHN DEERE PARTS Invoice 6974 - 189430 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts PERF ELECTRIC FAN $97.18 Invoice 6974- 187905 8/7/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts PERF ELECTRIC FAN RETURN - $97.18 Invoice 6974 - 188823 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts SEWER GENERATOR OIL FILTER RETURN - $10.29 Invoice 6974 - 188823 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts TRUCK VALVE #102 NEW HOLLAND $16.89 Invoice 6974- 189203 8/24/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $123.86 Refer 5 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities 3303 WATERBURY GAS SERVICE 7 -20 THRU $19.76 8 -20 -12 Invoice 09112012 8/22/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19.76 • Refer 6 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -224 Street Maint Materials 42A WEAR HOT ASPHALT MIX DURA DRIVE $547.20 10 TONS AUG DELIVERIES Invoice 29697 8/15/2012 2051 Transaction Dat 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $547.20 Refer 29 CORCORAN, CITY OF _ Cash Payment G 101 -22804 Police RV- Command Centr DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS FROM SALE $847.23 OF SOUTHWIND COMMAND VEHICLE Invoice 09112012 8/31/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $847.23 .v Refer 7 EMERYS TREE SERVICE, INCORP _ Cash Payment E 10145200 -533 Tree Removal REMOVE BASSWOOD @ 4873 $2,526.26 CUMBERLAND - WIND DAMAGE, REMOVE DEAD COTTONWOOD & LIMBS HANGING OVER GARAGE W /CRANE @ 3185 PRIEST LN, REMOVE 2 TREES IN ROW @ 6068 CHERRYWOOD RD Invoice 17513 8/24/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 �.-.=.»..,..,... Wells Fargo 10100 Total ��.... �. a ...,,�,.,.,,�..,.�,.»�..»..... $2,526.26 Refer 29 ESS BROTHERS AND SONS, INCO Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 27' SLOPE ADJ RING $33.13 Invoice RR5001 8/28/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $33.13 Refer 24 FIRE CHIEF, MN ASSOCIATION _ Cash Payment E 22242260 -434 Conference & Training CONF REGISTRATION MN STATE FIRE $228.00 CHIEFS ASSOC. G. PEDERSON • Invoice 09112012 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $228.00 Refer 9 FIVE TECHNOLOGY Cash Payment E 10141920 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY MANAGED SVC & NETWORK $1,800.00 MTCE- SEPTEMBER 2012 Invoice 125594 9/1/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY FEE FOR ONLINE POLICE $50.00 REPORT FORM SEPTEMBER 2012 Invoice 125594 9/1/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,850.00 Refer 11 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 9 -3 -12 $91.65 Invoice 1006111054 9/3/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 9 -3 -12 $171.28 Invoice 1006111053 9/3/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 9 -3 -12 $57.07 Invoice 1006111048 9/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 8 -27 -12 $57.07 Invoice 1006100039 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -27 -12 $59.66 Invoice 1006100046 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -27 -12 $40.76 Invoice 1006100046 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $477.49 • Refer 12 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -13 -12 $24.40 Invoice 1006877824 8/13/2012 20552 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $132.10 Refer 42 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL _ MOUND, MN 09/06/1211:47 AM Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -395 Gopher One -Call AUGUST 2012 LOCATES $138.53 Page 4 • Payments Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -395 Gopher One -Call AUGUST 2012 LOCATES CITY OF MOUND Invoice 45969 9/4/2012 Current Period: September 2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $277.05 Cash Payment E601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -13 -12 $25.27 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -331 Use of personal auto Invoice 1006877824 8/13/2012 $217.56 12 THRU 9 -6 -2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -13 -12 $35.52 Invoice 1006877824 8/13/2012 REIMB K. HANSON AIRFARE TO ICMA CONF $239.60 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -13 -12 $341.67 Invoice 1006877824 8/13/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -20 -12 $24.40 Invoice 1006889007 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -20 -12 $25.27 Invoice 1006889007 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -20 -12 $35.52 Invoice 1006889007 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -20 -12 $150.06 Invoice 1006889007 8/20/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -27 -12 $24.40 Invoice 1006100045 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -27 -12 $25.27 Invoice 1006100045 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 8 -27 -12 $61.07 Invoice 1006100045 8/27/2012 Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES 8 -27 -12 $155.53 • Cash Invoice 1006100045 8/27/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $928.38 Refer 13 GARY S DIESEL SERVICE Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic DOT TRUCK REPAIR $80.00 Invoice 17171 8/2/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts DOT TRUCK PARTS -WELD ON TAPERED $52.10 BRACKET, Invoice 17271 8/14/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $132.10 Refer 42 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL _ Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -395 Gopher One -Call AUGUST 2012 LOCATES $138.53 Invoice 45969 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -395 Gopher One -Call AUGUST 2012 LOCATES $138.52 Invoice 45969 9/4/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $277.05 Refer 17 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -331 Use of personal auto MILEAGE REIMB K. HANSON MEETINGS 1 -1- $217.56 12 THRU 9 -6 -2012 Invoice 09112012 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -434 Conference & Training REIMB K. HANSON AIRFARE TO ICMA CONF $239.60 IN PHOENIX OCT 5 -11 2012 Invoice 09112012 9/4/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $457.16 Refer 28 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED�� _�� - �� • Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -227 Chemicals 150 LB CHLORINE CYLINDERS $45.00 Invoice 3380012 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -227 Chemicals 150 LB CHLORINE, HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID $2,151.72 Invoice 3381701 8/28/2012 2053 MOUND, MN 09/06/1211:47 AM Page 5 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 1 11 11 ill i alm I Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,196.72 Refer 43 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I - Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -300 Professional Srvs MOUND MISC PLANNING SVCS AUGUST $394.25 2012 Invoice 007 - 001 -52 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $394.25 Refer 14 ISLAND PARK SKELLY� _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs ROTATE, MOUNT & BALANCE 2 TIRES $45.00 SQUAD #853 Invoice 033232 8/3/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs ROTATE & BALANCE TIRES SQUAD #846, $1,399.83 TUNE UP, REPLACE FRONT BRAKES, TIE RODS & ALIGNMENT Invoice 033313 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,444.83 Refer 23 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR _ W Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CONTRACT CLEANING CITY HALL $726.26 SEPTEMBER 2012 Invoice MIN09120324 9/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CONTRACT CLEANING PUBLIC $271.73 WORKS BLDG SEPTEMBER 2012 • Invoice MIN09120330 9/1/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $997.99 Refer 15 JERECZEK, JASON Cash Payment E 401 -43112 -300 Professional Srvs PIN UTILITY EASEMENT PAYMENT 4982 $796.25 LESLIE RD -1' STRIP ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE - JERECZEK PIN 12 -01 Invoice 09112012 9/5/2012 Project PW1201 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $796.25 Refer 16 JOHNS VARIETYAND PETS Cash Payment G 101 -22810 X -Mas Donation /Expense X -MAS LIGHTS $250.00 Invoice 451857 8/13/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 19 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101- 41410 -430 Miscellaneous COOKIES FOR ELECTION TRAININGS $10.97 Invoice 09112012 8/2/2012 Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies NATL NITE OUT SNACK & GALLON SIZE $11.47 STORAGE BAGS Invoice 09112012 8/6/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -210 Operating Supplies PAPER PRODUCTS CITY HALL $4.27 Invoice 09112012 8/15/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $40.30 Invoice 09112012 8/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE RETURN CREDIT - $28.08 Invoice 09112012 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies CASES OF WATER FOR FIRE SCENES $35.46 • Invoice 09112012 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $74.39 Refer 22 LAMMINEN, JIM _ 2054 _ MOUND, MN 09/06/1211:47 AM Page 6 Payments • // CITY MO UND CI OF MOE3 Current Period: September 2012 Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REIMB OVERPYMT OF WATER BILL @ 5004 $35.32 JENNINGS RD Invoice 09112012 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.32 Refer 18 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials MISC PARTS, PIPE ADAPTERS, SEAL $661.53 RINGS, FLEX HOSES Invoice 9301052720 8/22/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials MISC PARTS, PIPE ADAPTERS, HYDRO $184.89 COUPLERS & NIPPLES Invoice 9301037915 8/15/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 W Fargo 10100 Total $846.42 Refer 20 LSENGINEERS, INC. Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -300 Professional Srvs PARKS GARAGE FOUNDATION REPAIR $1,755.00 Invoice 9652 8/29/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,755.00 Refer 27 MEDINA, CITY OF �,,�,.�,.��.,�.�.....�. Cash Payment G 101 -22804 Police RV- Command Centr DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS FROM SALE $847.23 OF SOUTHWIND COMMAND VEHICLE Invoice 09112012 8/31/2012 • Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $847.23 Refer 44 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES OCTOBER 2012 $62,357.48 Invoice 0000997685 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $62,357.48 Refer 23 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA� �� " � „ �� a � ,aY � Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION FEE MN MUNICIPAL $15.00 BEVERAGE MTG -J. COLOTTI OCT 3RD ROSEVILLE Invoice 09112012 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 27 MINNETRISTA, CITY OF Cash Payment G 101 -22804 Police RV- Command Centr DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS FROM SALE $847.23 OF SOUTHWIND COMMAND VEHICLE Invoice 09112012 8/31/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $847.23 Refer 25 MOONEY, DEAN L. ....u... Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -431 Meeting Expense REIMB D. MOONEY MTG MEALS APRIL & $45.00 MAY- INCLUDES LTNT LUNCH Invoice 09112012 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -431 Meeting Expense REIMB D. MOONEY PARKING ST. CHIEF'S $12.80 CONF APRIL 24 -26 ST. CLOUD Invoice 09112012 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -431 Meeting Expense REIMB D. MOONEY MEAL 6 -25 -12 SECURITY $15.00 SEMINAR FBINA • Invoice 09112012 9/4/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.80 Refer 26 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO 2055 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 11:47 AM Page 7 L Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib SEPTEMBER 2012 FIRE RELIEF $11,968.75 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 09112012 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,968.75 Refer 30 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA LA _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION & PLANTING 8- $1,668.50 Refer 32 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED _ 20 -12 GLADSTONE LANE LIFT STATION N11- • Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic PIN 11 -03 $50.20 Invoice 27022 8/27/2012 Project PW1103 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,668.50 Refer 31 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN _ Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts SINGLE USE FIRE EXTINGUISHER, $53.53 WARNING TRIANGLES #312 $70.46 Invoice 62808 8/23/2012 JONES LANE Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $53.53 Refer 27 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic SVC CALL TO OVERHAUL BOOSTER $2,977.54 STATION 4" CLAS -VALS, MISC FITTINGS, REPAIR GFCI ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE $473.48 VALVE CHECK ON GREENWAY Invoice 120379DJ -1 8/29/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,977.54 Refer 32 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED _ • Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic CONTRACTED PEST CONTROL SVC 8 -10 -12 $50.20 LIQUOR STORE Invoice 3294305 8/10/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.20 Refer 34 PYGMAN, MERI _ Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND OVERPYMT OF WATER BILL 1781 $70.46 JONES LANE Invoice 09112012 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.46 Refer 33 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -221 Equipment Parts REPAIR GFCI ELECTRICAL RECEPTACLE $473.48 ON GREENWAY Invoice 3462 8/20/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $473.48 Refer 35 RICOH USA, INC. _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -202 Duplicating and copying COPIER RENTAL FEE 6 -13 -12 THRU 9 -12 -12 $161.34 FIRE DEPT Invoice 87568399 8/24/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $161.34 Refer 22 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORA Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -440 Other Contractual Servic TRANSIT CENTER ELEVATOR #1 REPAIRS 8- $1,020.09 8 -12 STUCK ON 4TH FLOOR Invoice 7151667256 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -440 Other Contractual Servic TRANSIT CENTER ELEVATOR #1 REPAIRS 8- $622.31 • 16 -12 STUCK ON 4TH FLOOR Invoice 7151669982 8/29/2012 2056 Invoice 096997 MOUND, MN 09/06/1211: 9 $ E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 097114 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Payments 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CITY OF [MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Transaction Date 9/612012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,642.40 Refer 36 STERNE ELECTRIC COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -401 Building Repairs ELECTRIC REPAIRS TO LGE MTG ROOM $108.47 LIGHTS & REPAIR OUTSIDE LIGHT FIXTURES PS BLDG Invoice 11066 7/9/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance ELECTRIC REPAIRS TO LGE MTG ROOM $108.47 LIGHTS & REPAIR OUTSIDE LIGHT FIXTURES PS BLDG Invoice 11066 7/9/2012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -401 Building Repairs ELECTRIC REPAIRS TO LGE MTG ROOM $357.25 LIGHTS & REPAIR OUTSIDE LIGHT FIXTURES PS BLDG Invoice 11074 7/16/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance ELECTRIC REPAIRS TO LGE MTG ROOM $357.24 LIGHTS & REPAIR OUTSIDE LIGHT FIXTURES PS BLDG Invoice 11074 7/16/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $931.43 Refer 37 STRETCHER S Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -110 Clothing Allowance INITIAL ISSUE UNIFORM -P. SPANJERS $852.96 VEST, TRAUMA PLATE, PANTS, FREEZE • SPRAY Invoice 1954438 8127/2012 PO 24122 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $852.96 Refer 21 THYSSEN -KRUPP ELEVATOR COR Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CITY HALL 19 -1- $731.87 12 THRU 11 -30 -12 Invoice 3000239724 911/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $731.87 Refer 38 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 4" PERFORATED DRAIN TILE $43.28 Invoice 10040249 8/8/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $43.28 Refer 39 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -322 Postage FED EX SHIPPING 8 -13 -12 $14.18 Invoice 096877 8/13/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies #105 5 QT PAIL, RIVET, SUPER SHOCK, $41.50 Invoice 096997 8/16/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 097114 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 097300 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply GLOVES GREASE, SUPER SHOCK $18.67 SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS PARKS $11.21 PLANTS FOR CITY HALL EXTERIOR $64.04 PLANTERS • Invoice 097504 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -322 Postage Invoice 097372 8/29/2012 FED EX SHIPPING 8 -29 -12 MN DEPT OF $19.74 HEALTH 2057 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 11:47 AM Page 9 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Cash Payment E 60249450 -210 Operating Supplies PINE SOL, FANTASTIK, SOAP $8.31 Invoice 097469 9/1/2012 285 MOUND HRA $1,642.40 Transa ction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $177.65 Refer 40 TURTLE MAC AND KEY PRINTING 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $191.56 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -200 Office Supplies 5,000 #9 WINDOW ENVELOPES W/ LOGO $303.53 Invoice 19967 9/5/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -200 Office Supplies 5,000 #10 REGULAR ENVELOPES W/ LOGO $319.55 Invoice 19967 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $623.08 Refer 41 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE AND Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts TIRES FOR #102 & BOBCAT SKIDSTER $1,282.50 Invoice 687151 8/21/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts DURA PATCHES #804 TRAILER $227.56 Invoice 687144 8/21/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts 6 HANKOOK TRACTION TIRES #209, TUBES $1,535.52 Invoice 686211 8/9/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts BALANCE PASSENGER TIRE #209 $60.00 Invoice 687598 8/28/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,105.58 Fund Summary $123,093.70 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $123,093.70 Total $123,093.70 • • Q$7X .*] 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $18,522.85 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $13,884.22 285 MOUND HRA $1,642.40 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $880.25 601 WATER FUND $5,694.96 602 SEWER FUND $69,285.69 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $191.56 670 RECYCLING FUND $12,991.77 $123,093.70 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $123,093.70 Total $123,093.70 • • Q$7X .*] Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $283.90 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ MOUND, MN 09/06/12 1:24 PM Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale WINE Page 1 Invoice 74852500 8/24/2012 Payments • , � $18.60 Invoice 74852500 8/24/2012 CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Current Period: September 2012 - $426.95 Invoice 74778400 8/20/2012 Batch Name 091112HWS User Dollar Amt $92,606.62 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Payments Computer Dollar Amt $92,606.62 $2,764.52 Invoice 74864900 8/27/2012 $0.00 In Balance Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ $452.00 Invoice 74964000 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $45.76 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 379223607 9/3/2012 $15.50 Invoice 74948500 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 379223607 9/3/2012 $1,208.65 74948500 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $201.68 • Invoice Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 438224502 9/1/2012 $6,248.59 Invoice 74962300 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa LIQUOR Invoice 438224502 9/1/2012 Invoice 74962300 9/4/2012 2059 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 462223805 8/25/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $103.08 Invoice 462223805 8/25/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total � $353.52 Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE, CORCKSCREW, SHAKER $50.00 • SET, SHOT CUPS Invoice 87242200 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies BAGS $62.40 Invoice 87242200 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS $21.35 Invoice 87273700 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE, SHOT CUPS $26.05 Invoice 87273700 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $124.10 Invoice 87273700 8/31/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $283.90 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale WINE $2,357.99 Invoice 74852500 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $18.60 Invoice 74852500 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT - $426.95 Invoice 74778400 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,764.52 Invoice 74864900 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $452.00 Invoice 74964000 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $15.50 Invoice 74948500 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,208.65 74948500 8/31/2012 • Invoice Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,248.59 Invoice 74962300 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa LIQUOR $62.50 Invoice 74962300 9/4/2012 2059 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 1:24 PM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,701.40 Refer 4 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $216.80 Invoice 18813 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $917.64 Invoice 18814 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale CREDIT BEER - $167.60 Invoice 800844 8/21/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $966.84 Refer 5 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING C Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $371.40 Invoice 480680 8/23/2012 Tra nsaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $371.40 Refer 6 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWES Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $288.32 Invoice 0128052118 8/30/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $288.32 Refer 30 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $401.00 Invoice 1038017 8/27/2012 • Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $401.00 Refer 8 DAYDISTR COMPANY w _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 665864 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 665865 8/2012012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 666132 8/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 667036 9/5/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 667035 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 9 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 60949750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice W601257 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice W609176 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo Refer 7 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 614410 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 606271 8/29/2012 $4,426.00 $103.10 $113.00 $22.40 $2,437.30 10100 Total $7,101.80 $270.00 $94.50 10100 Total $364.50 $1,031.00 $427.50 Transaction Date 9/512012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,458.50 Refer 10 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ 2060 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,871.75 Invoice 1866571 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $15.50 Invoice 1866507 8/21/2012 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,798.05 Invoice 1866548 8/28/2012 Cash Payment Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,654.30 Refer 11 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUT MINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,013.13 Invoice 1866506 8/21/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $116.40 Invoice 1866576 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $44.00 Invoice 010661 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $182.00 Invoice 1852449 8/21/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $903.53 Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $944.56 1336094 7/3/2012 • Invoice Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,641.75 Invoice 1373062 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,198.45 Invoice 1373061 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $29.95 Invoice 1373063 8/22/2012 PO 3 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,485.25 Invoice 1378125 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,079.05 Invoice 1378126 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $20.99 Invoice 1378127 8/29/2012 PO 3 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,400.00 Refer 13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $399.72 Invoice 546267 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $394.49 Invoice 546268 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $36.00 Invoice 546269 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $77.20 Invoice 546270 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$7.63 Invoice 546271 8/24/2012 Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $29.95 • Cash Invoice 545938 8/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.47 Invoice 537827 6/15/2012 2061 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 1:24 PM Page 4 Payments f - - -- •ner� 1 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT 8/27/2012 -$1.47 Invoice 537828 6/15/2012 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - $947.93 Refer 15 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 2294199 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS EXTERIOR, ENTRY IN & $65.19 8/29/2012 Cash Payment OUT Invoice 2294198 8/29/2012 Invoice 928001040 8/19/2012 E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 2290772 8/22/2012 Tr Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65.19 Refer 14 MINNESOTA PUBLISHING Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising 1/4 PAGE AD SEPT 2012 WEST LAKE $130.00 BUSINESS PUBLICATION Invoice 14563 9/1/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.00 Refer 17 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $104.00 Invoice 8363563 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.25 Invoice 8363563 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,105.02 Invoice 8363322 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 8363322 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $457.05 Invoice 8362860 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.50 Invoice 8362860 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $541.65 Invoice 8363649 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.50 Invoice 8363649 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,029.47 Refer 16 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 8363650 8/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight Invoice 8363650 8/27/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Refer 118 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 2294196 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 2294199 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 2294197 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 2294198 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 2290772 8/22/2012 LIQUOR $56.01 FREIGHT $2.25 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $58.26 WINE $702.22 LIQUOR $742.35 BEER $48.00 • i s WINE $227.50 • LIQUOR $176.00 2062 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 1:24 PM Page 5 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,434.96 Invoice 2290773 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.47 Invoice 3484423 6/15/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$2.94 Invoice 3484425 6115/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.47 Invoice 3484427 6/15/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,325.15 Refer 19 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 8 -31 -12 & $30.00 9 -30 -12 EDITIONS Invoice 963610 8/21/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 20 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF Mwa_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $168.00 Invoice 1853985 8/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,284.94 Invoice 1862157 8/23/2012 • Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,086.20 Invoice 1853989 8/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $361.87 Invoice 1862171 8/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,716.00 Invoice 1874619 8/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,056.58 Invoice 1889800 8/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $166.16 Invoice 1889811 8/30/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,503.75 Refer 21 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $113.60 Invoice 709256 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $64.50 Invoice 709257 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,009.80 Invoice 709258 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $308.00 Invoice 00773888 8/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $18.00 Invoice 710553 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $65.20 Invoice 710553 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,191.32 Invoice 710554 9/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $681.65 Invoice 710388 8/31/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,452.07 . �. 2063 � Invoice 0061869 8/22/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $471.42 Refer 23 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 1:24 PM Payments Page 6 E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising SEPT 2012 HWS WEBSITE CITY OF MOUND Invoice 1015 9/1/2012 Current Period: September 2012 Refer 22 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $11.92 Invoice 0061946 8/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $348.00 Invoice 0061946 8/23/2012 $580.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 0061946 8/23/2012 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE RED BARREL $99.00 Invoice 0061869 8/22/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $471.42 Refer 23 WINE CONNECT _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising SEPT 2012 HWS WEBSITE $95.12 Invoice 1015 9/1/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.12 Refer 24 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $580.00 Invoice 415337 7/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $15.75 Invoice 415338 7/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,324.00 Invoice 420821 8/22/2012 • Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $660.00 Invoice 421651 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$2.94 Invoice 58162 6/15/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 . Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,576.81 Refer 25 WINE NEWS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE ENTHUSIAST SEPT 2012 $15.00 PUBLICATIONS Invoice 962564 8/20/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 27 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,451.10 Invoice 947602 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $50.70 Invoice 947603 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $144.00 Invoice 950967 9/5/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $90.00 Invoice 947604 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $146.00 Invoice 948085 8/29/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $144.00 Invoice 951445 9/5/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,090.75 Invoice 950966 9/5/2012 • Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,116.55 Refer 26 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER - 2064 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $92,606.62 $92,606.62 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $92,606.62 Total $92,606.62 i s 2065 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 1:24 eM • Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,085.25 Invoice 944320 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.50 Invoice 944321 8/2212012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $114.00 Invoice 944322 8/22/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $78.00 Invoice 802 5/7/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $47.64 Invoice 940800 7/2/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,346.39 Refer 28 W/R7Z BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $535.50 Invoice 792906 8/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $445.00 Invoice 792485 8/23/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,163.29 Invoice 796088 8/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,122.01 Invoice 792907 8/2312012 • Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,409.56 Invoice 796087 8/30/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $186.00 Invoice 796574 8/31/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,861.36 Refer 29 Z WINES USA LLCT .Y.�.µ.�.�.�..�. Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $224.00 Invoice 11349 9/5/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 11349 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/5/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $229.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $92,606.62 $92,606.62 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $92,606.62 Total $92,606.62 i s 2065 MOUND, MN 09/06/12 1:43 PM Payments Page 1 IL CITY OF BOUND Current Period: September 2012 Batch Name 0911 CITY2 User Dollar Amt $166,681.87 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $166,681.87 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ASPEN EQUIPMENT _ Cash Payment E 10143100 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW TRUCK BOX & $58,772.80 HOIST BUILDOUT Invoice 10103170 7/27/2012 PO 23651 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW TRUCK BOX & $7,346.60 HOIST BUILDOUT Invoice 10103170 7/27/2012 PO 23651 Cash Payment E 60249450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW TRUCK BOX & $7,346.60 HOIST BUILDOUT Invoice 10103170 7/27/2012 PO 23651 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -438 Licenses and Taxes SALES TAX ON 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW $4,040.63 TRUCK BOX & HOIST BUILDOUT Invoice 10103170 7/2712012 PO 23651 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400438 Licenses and Taxes SALES TAX ON 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW $505.08 TRUCK BOX & HOIST BUILDOUT Invoice 10103170 7/27/2012 PO 23651 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -438 Licenses and Taxes SALES TAX ON 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW $505.08 TRUCK BOX & HOIST BUILDOUT Invoice 10103170 7/27/2012 PO 23651 • Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $78,516.79 Refer 2 ASPEN EQUIPMENT . Cash Payment E 10143100440 Other Contractual Servic UNDERCOATING PW TRUCK #112 $931.95 Invoice 10104462 8/31/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $931.95 Refer 3 (STATE TRUCK CENTER _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW TRUCK - CABIN $69,786.51 CHASSIS Invoice V242005093 6/5/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW TRUCK - CABIN $8,723.31 CHASSIS Invoice V242005093 6/5/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 FREIGHTLINER PLOW TRUCK - CABIN $8,723.31 CHASSIS Invoice V242005093 6/5/2012 Transaction Date 9/6/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $87,233.13 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $133,531.89 $16,574.99 $16,574.99 $166,681.87 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $166,681.87 Total $166,681.87 LUbb • MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 28, 2012 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in rescheduled regular session on Tuesday, August 28, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, Heidi Gesch, and David Osmek Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Finance Director Catherine Pausche, Interim Police Chief Dean Mooney, Nick Stoiaken, Doug Dion, Nancy Swanson, Lili McMillan, Chris Fischer, Doug Franchot, David Rahn, John McKinley, Mary McKinley, Dan Grady, William Ernst, Richard Hawks, Shirley Hawks, Duane Norberg, Joe Gibson, Joanne Gibson, Linda Princivalli, Dorothy Geyen, Kris Williams, Jeff Gresenz, Justin Gresenz, Robert & Connie Blake, Janie Skinner, Mike Russin, Phyllis Stoiaken, Lois Dion, Blaze Fugina, Jessica Loftus, Dwayne Platzer, Peter Meyer, Linda Johnson, Tom Rockvam, Bruce Dodds, Bruce Jordan, Kim Truax, Scott Spanjers, Kenny Beck, Jim Bedell, Johann Chemin, Kathy Spaulding, Bruce Larson, Patty Miller, Mary Harrell, Jeff Anderson, Kristin & John Beise, Jim Brand, Dean Fleming, Sally Koenecke, Judy Regan, Mark Regan, Dean Blackwell, Jane Carlsen, Sandy Olstad. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. • 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda Gillispie requested the removal of Item 4B from the consent agenda. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to approve the agenda as amended. Upon roll call voted, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $1,110,766.70 B. (removed) C. Approve amendment to Temporary Sign Permit for 2012 Scarecrow Stomp D. ORDINANCE NO. 08 -2012: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 119 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO SIGNS E. 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project - Highland Area (MSA Route) 1. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -70: RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON 2011 STREET, • UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPOVEMENT PROJECT - HIGHLAND AREA (MSA ROUTE) 2067 Mound City Council Minutes — August 28, 2012 2. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -71: RESOLUION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2011 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL • IMPROVEMENT PORJECT — HIGHLAND AREA (MSA ROUTE) F. 2011 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — SW Island Area 1. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -72: RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ON 2011 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPOVEMENT PROJECT — SW ISLAND AREA 2. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -73: RESOLUION FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR 2011 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PORJECT — SW ISLAND AREA 4B. Approve minutes MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to approve the minutes of the August 16, 2012 meeting. The following voted in'favor: Salazar, Hanus, Gesch and Osmek. The following voted against: None. Gillispie abstained from voting because she was absent from that meeting. Motion carried. 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the ag enda. None were offered. 6. Discussion on supervisor compensation and direction to Staff and Perso Committee reaardina employee classification and compensation study, includ timing of such study and any recommendations. Hanus stated that at the last meeting individuals were told that they would have an opportunity • to address this topic at this meeting. Nick Stoiaken, 4948 Bartlett Blvd, raised concern over the level of City Department Heads' salaries and read some National Average comparisons that he had researched. Hanus stated that City Staff has also done some research as to salary comparisons, and Finance Director Catherine Pausche presented this information. Dwayne Platzer, 5931 Sunset Rd, said it was shown that the City Manager hadn't had a raise in three years, and asked if she received a raise in PERA instead of a pay raise. Pausche answered the City Manager has been at the top of the pay scale and receives a contribution to her deferred compensation plan, but no increases since 2008, as the rest of the staff. John McKinley, 5948 Hillcrest Road, stated that the City has picked out numerous cities to use for negotiations for contracts. When using these same cities for comparison, the City Manager and Finance Director's salaries are more, and feels that these cities should be the ones being used for internal salary comparisons. City Manager Hanson stated that a lot of the cities used for negotiations don't have a liquor store, redevelopment, etc., and internal salaries have to be compared with cities with a similar profile. Hanus stated that when Hanson was hired she designed a staff to suit the needs of the time, i.e., infrastructure needs, redevelopment, etc. Lately staff has been reduced and changed to meet the needs of the city, and this process will continue. McKinley stated that the cities used for the internal comparisons have police departments that do the same thing that Mound does. Hanus stated that the City has looked at places to get leaner and one place that hasn't been looked at yet is upper management. He suggested that the Personnel Committee take a look at this. • R.: Mound City Council Minutes — August 28, 2012 Mary McKinley, 5948 Hillcrest, stated that people are concerned with what is going on at City • Hall. Salaries seem to be of interest, however, most are not looking at the numbers, but at the job performance involved with the compensation and don't see equity there. She has three different sets of numbers given to three different people, and it's hard to argue numbers when they change constantly. Productivity, priorities and job performance are of concern and people don't think they are getting what they're paying for. Hanus stated that the City Manager receives a performance evaluation every year and explained that some general citizens, as well as other city staff have input before the Council performs their evaluation and decides to extend her contract. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to refer the salaries of upper management to the Personnel Committee for review. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7. Discussion and actio on Contract for Law Enforcement Services between the City of Orono and the City of Mound Hanus stated that he received a couple emails immediately after the last meeting that indicated the writers had contacted Orono and were told that Orono is able to delay action until a referendum in Mound is accomplished, and this would be workable for their Police Department. Hanus stated this is contrary to what he's been hearing. The other email stated that Orono prefer that Mound hold a referendum so the citizens could vote. Hanus stated that since those messages were contrary to what Orono has been conveying, he asked the emailers who they talked to in Orono, and they were unwilling to reveal this. Hanus stated when he talked to the Orono Police Chief, the Mayor, and the City Administrator, and all three reconfirmed that this is absolutely not true. This would not work for Orono, their officers, or Mound's officers. Mound officers have indicated that if there is any more delay, they will be looking for positions • elsewhere. What it boils down to is that these people were trying to manipulate the Council. John McKinley approached the Council saying he sent the first email and that the Mayor is making accusations. Shirley Hawks, 2640 Setter Circle, stated that she talked to the Orono Police Chief and asked him if this went to a referendum, would Orono pull out completely. She was told no, he wasn't saying that, but it would make it very difficult for the officers from both cities due to scheduling, etc., and that it would be harder, and she earlier conveyed that to McKinley. John McKinley stated he met with Chief Forniok, and most of the conversation was confidential. Forniok told McKinley that it would not be his decision to make, but is the decision of Chief Mooney and the Mound City Council. Geoff Michael, 1713 Avocet Lane, called Point of Order, being that the Council is so far off the point and needs to be brought back to it. The Council is in a hurry to make a decision about a Police Department when they should be in a hurry to get the roads fixed, keep the Police Department, and get the City back up and running by raising the tax base. He presumes that other departments will be outsourced, and asked if the Council will outsource City Management. Hanus stated he's past the Point of Order and the public forum was already held at a previous meeting. Nancy Swanson, 5941 Gumwood, stated that at the last meeting she was told she could speak at this meeting, and asked if she could do so, and would like to be heard. Hanus told her to submit her concerns, but not at this meeting. Osmek suggested having a thirty minute • testimony period and then the Council can take steps and move forward. Gesch, Salazar and Gillispie agreed with this. 4i1*, Mound City Council Minutes — August 28, 2012 Nancy Swanson, 5941 Gumwood, stated she appreciates the city looking for ways to cut costs, • but feels all of the due diligence hasn't been done. She understands that the City is looking to save 15 %, or $300,000. As the process has gone on, we want to do for a 10% savings, or $200,000, which is 4% of the entire budget. She asked if the city needs both a City Manager and a Community Development Director. Also do we need three managers in Public Works. If we get rid of two of these positions we have the $200,000. She continued by asking why these personnel cuts weren't considered before the decision to get rid of the Police Department. She states when a Police Department goes it's bad, and it looks like we're in dire straits. She previously asked the Finance Director what the net effect would be on a $200,000 home if the levy were increased by 1 % or 2 %. She was told that the effect on a $200,000 home would an estimate of $7 /year. She was also told there will be a levy increase in 2013 regardless of what happens to the Police Department. A 6% levy increase would add $50 /year on a $200,000 home. Swanson is willing to pay the extra, and is asking the Council to look at these options and ways to save this money rather than outsourcing the Police Department. She also stated that there is no way that Mound can afford to re- establish a Police Department should it not work out well with Orono. Hanus informed her that it isn't a 1 % increase, but a 7% increase to keep the Police Department here, plus whatever else has to be tacked on this year for general operations. John McKinley, 5948 Hillcrest, showed an overhead regarding the contract and conversion costs. He stated that there are items that weren't brought up, i.e., the debt service on the building, electrical, maintenance, moving city hall, costs to make city hall rentable, equaling a cost of $2,030,000 in 2013 alone. He also presented response times of Mound vs. Orono. Johan Chemin, 6039 Beachwood Rd, stated that it will be impossible to re- instate a Police • Department. He asked that if a vote is taken tonight, a provision be inserted that the next City Council can re- evaluate the outsourcing of the Police Department. Mike Russin, 3175 NorthShore, stated he is a resident of Orono, and expressed his dis- satisfaction with the Orono Police Department regarding dealings he has had with them. Mary Harrel, 920 Upper Cove Rd, stated she is employed in Mound and expressed how sad it is to dismantle an award - winning Police Department and to do away with it doesn't make sense. She stated that the people should be able to decide. Pat Meisel, 5501 Bartlett Blvd., posed the question: If Mound couldn't get along with Orono to build a Public Safety building, what makes them think they can get along to do this? She also asked why the City wants to compete with businesses in town on rentals by renting City Hall. Dwayne Platzer, 5931 Sunset, asked the Council to save the Police Department and raise taxes if need be. Geoff Michael, 1713 Avocet Lane, apologized to the Council for his previous Point of Order usage. He would like to know an honest answer as to why taxes can't be raised for the betterment of the City. Jeff Gresenz, 5975 Lynwood Blvd, stated he transferred to Minnesota three years ago and chose Mound because of its schools and city services, which includes the Police Department. Without a local Police Department he wouldn't have chosen Mound. • 2070 Mound City Council Minutes — August 28, 2012 Bruce Jordan, 6016 Beachwood Road, thanked the Council for keeping taxes down but for the • Council to make this decision on their own instead of bringing it to the public is wrong. The Police Department is extremely important to the City. Nancy Swanson, 5941 Gumwood, stated that response time has been discussed and one minute can be the difference between life and death. She asked that this decision not be made tonight and set the levy higher to keep the department. With the thirty minute testimony period being over, Hanus brought the topic back to the Council for discussion. Hanus stated that the Council has previously heard to keep the taxes down. City staff has already been reduced by 18% and now upper management will be looked at. He hears both sides by phone calls and emails and the only ones that show up at meetings are the people against the issue. Gesch thinks the thirty minute testimony period was useful. She doesn't understand why Mound officers won't still be award winning if they merge with Orono. The force will only be bigger and better. She added up the people she's hear from at the last two meetings, phone calls and emails, and has a total, of 45 out of 9,000 people that have been heard. People that have personally talked to her are more in the affirmative than negative, and the biggest thing she's heard from them is not to raise taxes. Gillespie agreed with Gesch, stating that she's not looking at this as dismantling a department, but adding two together. She was elected to make the best decision and has talked to more • people that are either for or indifferent to the merger, than against. Salazar stated he studied the contract in detail and the service and response times are favorable. The officers will receive higher pay and better benefits and scheduling with Orono, and Mound's police station will remain a base of operation. His three goals were achieved: 1) 10% or $200,000 savings; 2) Service maintained; 3) Mound officers treated fairly. He continued by stating that there is nothing more important than public safety, but believes there should be a referendum on a decision this large. Osmek stated that the main reason he backed away from police dealings with Minnetrista was that there would be no presence in our facility. This is not the case with Orono.. He would also have preferred a referendum, but there isn't time and Orono would have walked away. Our Police Department is currently short- staffed so now is the time to take this action. He personally asked a Mound Officer if he wanted to go with Orono and if it would be a safer department. He was told yes, and that there is better back -up and better advancement. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Gesch to approve the Contract for Law Enforcement Services between the City of Orono and the City of Mound. The following voted in favor: Gillispie, Hanus, Gesch and Osmek. The following voted against: Salazar. Motion carried. 8. 2013 Preliminary Budget and Levy, requesting direction Finance Director Pausche stated that feedback is requested on five items before the preliminary budget is adopted. • 2071 Mound City Council Minutes — August 28, 2012 A. Villa Dock Fee Increase — Pausche stated that the City issued GO TIF bonds to finance the clean -up of the Lost Lake dump and dredging of the channel in order to ready it for • redevelopment. With the recession, available tax increment is currently not sufficient to provide for the debt service on the bonds, nor will it be for the uncertain future. In 2009,-the HRA and City entered into an agreement to authorize an interfund loan in order to allow the City to use funds other than available tax increment to make the required payment on the bonds. The available tax increment continues to fall short as redevelopment has stagnated and land values have declined in the Lost Lake District. She is proposing to raise the fees for the Villa docks to contribute to the debt service of the bonds. This was presented to the Docks Commission and was tabled, with direction that Dave Osmek and Pausche would meet to develop a tiered fee schedule to be considered. B. Request by the LMCC to raise Mediacom PEG access fees from $.84 to $1.21 — Pausche stated that the lake Minnetonka Communications Commission has requested that the Public, Education and Government (PEG) access fee be increased from the current $.84 to $1.21 per month and pass on the entire amount to the LMCC. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to amend the Local Programming Facilities Agreement with the LMCC to reflect an increase in the PEG access fee from $.84 to $1.21 per month. The following voted in favor: Gillispie, Salazar, Gesch and Osmek. The following voted against: None. Hanus abstained from voting because his son is on the staff of LMCC. Motion carried. C. Review of preliminary budget assumptions with regard to liquor store profit assumptions transfers and equipment certificates — Pausche informed the Council that the contract award for the Police Supervisors union was 1 % and 1 %. When the 2012 budget was • done, no wage increases were included so that during negotiations the inability to pay could be argued. The budget is going to increase so a levy increase needs to be looked at for 2013, and stated she would like to bring forward a 3% general fund levy increase for the preliminary budget. Pausche continued stating that the liquor store transfers are about a year behind projections and anticipate about a $50,000 transfer in 2013 to the general fund. In prior years the liquor store proceeds were used for the seal coat project but she doesn't want to assume any transfers out of the general fund for 2013. Hanus stated he would like to entertain boosting the preliminary budget to 4% general fund levy increase, but strive for 3 %. The Council agreed with this strategy. Regarding the equipment certificates, Pausche stated that she will be putting those into the 2013 to the extent that we can. Ideally she would like to work to fund capital investments from the general levy and move away from these certificates. D. Request to issue an RFP for prosecution services — Pausche is requesting to go out for RFPs. The current arrangement is a fee for service and the City has become aware of some firms that are willing to put an annual not to exceed amount in exchange for a multi -year contract. The Council's consensus was to proceed with an RFP for prosecution services. E. Request to loin Metro Cities Association of Metropolitan Municipalities — Pausche indicated that Metro Cities is requesting that the City join, with dues for 2013 being $1,868 (50% • discount for new members), and $3,736.00 thereafter. It was suggested that instead of making 2072 Mound City Council Minutes — August 28, 2012 a decision now, that the next time Mound has a need for them, get them involved and determine • what they have to offer. 9. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Minnetonka Beach /Dakota Trail Minutes: June 11, 2012 C. Reports: Finance Department — July 2012 Reports D. Correspondence: Letter /Lake Minnetonka Association: August 13, 2012 Letter /Sheriff Stanek: August 21, 2012 10. Adiourn MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to adjourn at 9:35 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • • 2073 5341 Maywood Road City of Mound Mound, MN 55364 Planning and Building Department (952) 472 -0604 Executive Summary • TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 5, 2012 SUBJECT: Expansion Permit Application —upper level removal /addition ADDRESS: 4606 Carlow Road APPLICANT: Steve Gravelle (on behalf of owner Jack Miller) PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 12 -17 ZONING: R -1A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential REQUEST. At its September 4, 2012 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed an expansion permit application from Steve Gravelle of Top Notch Construction, on behalf of owner, Jack Miller, to allow a house remodel project at 4606 Carlow Road which includes removal of walls and roof of the existing • story and a half and construction of new walls and roof to provide a full second story. The proposed new walls and roof modifications would be constructed over a portion of the existing building footprint which is nonconforming. SITE CONDITIONS There is an existing single family house and detached garage located on the property at 4606 Carlow Road. The subject property abuts the Commons on the east side which extends to Lake Minnetonka. The subject property is accessed by a driveway /road that extends from Carlow Road on to Kenmare Common. There are a number of existing nonconforming conditions associated with the subject property including, but not limited to, setbacks, hardcover and lack of street frontage. The proposed addition, which is being constructed over portion of the existing building footprint, is expanding the side setback condition on the south side as the subject wall is "going up ". However, the project does not change or expand the existing building footprint. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OVERVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. In summary, the Planning Commission was favorable to the request and unanimously voted to recommend City Council approval of the requested variance, as recommended by Staff, subject to conditions. General discussion took place about the building code requirements that will apply to the project due to the proximity of the structure to the south lot line. The 9 -4 -2012 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts (draft) have been included. A resolution based on the Planning Commission recommendation has been included. • 2074 MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert, and Councilmember Ray Salazar. Staff present: Planning Commission Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Steve Gravelle, Top Notch Exteriors BOARD OF APPEALS Case No. 12 -17 Expansion Permit — 4606 Carlow Road Applicant: Steve Gravelle of Top Notch Exteriors Smith introduced the expansion request. The applicarl I t proposes to remove walls and roof on the existing structure and construct new walls and roof.tli provide a full second story. The proposed new walls and roof modifications wcw# i be Constructed over a portion of the existing building footprint which is nonconform, Thy cut building setback on the south side is the affected side and is set back only 2.25;feet (east corner) and 2.85 feet (west corner) feet from the property line. Staff has recommended approval with conditions as stated in the planning report. Linkert felt it was a great improvement to the property. Retterath commented that, since the building code supersedes the zoning code, it's hard to imagine a 3 inch overhang. He supports it as a member of the Planning Commission; however, he feels there is a loss of design opportunity in the planned roof pitch. Salazar pointed out that the existing house presents difficulties for the resident in that he cannot stand fully erect in his bathroom because of the ceiling height. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Goode, to recommend approval of the expansion request with conditions as recommended by staff. MOTION carried unanimously. • 2075 • RESOLUTION # 12- RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPANSION PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4606 CARLOW ROAD WHEREAS, the subject property at 4606 Carlow Road includes a single family house and detached garage. The subject property is accessed by a driveway /road that extends from Carlow Road on to Kenmare Commons. It abuts Kenmare Commons on the east side which extends to Lake Minnetonka. There are a number of existing nonconforming conditions associated with the subject property including, but not limited to, setbacks, hardcover and lack of street frontage; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Steve Gravelle of Top Notch Construction, on behalf of owner, Jack Miller, submitted an expansion permit application to allow an upper floor house remodel project which includes removal of walls and roof of the existing story and a half and construction of new walls and roof to provide a full second story. The proposed addition is being constructed over portion of the existing building footprint and will expand the side setback condition on the south side as the subject wall is "going up "; and • WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R -1A and a minimum side setback of six (6) is required. The current setback of the house in the project area is 2.25 FT. The proposal does not change or expand the existing building footprint; and WHEREAS, in City Code Section 129 -2, an expansion permit is defined as follows: Expansion permit means a permit which is granted by the City Council for the expansion or enlargement of a nonconforming structure in accordance with Section 129 -40. and; WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting expansion permits and are described as follows: Sec. 129 -40. Expansion Permit. (a) Criteria. An expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the reasonable use of the land. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the applicant must satisfy the City Council that the following criteria exist: • 2076 (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: • a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. and; WHEREAS, details regarding the application are contained in Executive Summary No. 12 -17, Planning Report No 12 -17 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant and owner; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions; and • WHEREAS, the expansion permit was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its September 4, 2012 meeting and recommended Council approval as recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the expansion permit to allow for construction of an upper floor removal /addition project at 4606 Carlow Road as recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to the following list of conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. 3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application, which may include but is not limited to, the submittal of revised building plans to specifically address openings, eaves and fire rating for the south wall of the proposed addition. The proposed project shall meet the provisions of the building code in all regards including, but not limited to, openings /projections for appurtenances /structures located within certain distances. Applicant shall work with Staff and the Building Officials • 2077 4. An expansion permit granted will automatically expire and be of no further force and effect if no building permit has been issued within one year of the date of approval of the expansion permit unless an extension is approved pursuant to the regulations contained in City Code Section 129.40, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 5. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighbor's property. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 9. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) • rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 11. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. The RPFE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. 12. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain area(s). 13. Any additional recommended conditions from Staff, consultants, agencies or the Planning Commission. In recommending approval of the requested Expansion Permit, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 1. The requested construction is being constructed over a portion of the existing footprint of the existing house. 2. Conditions of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. • 2078 • The expansion permit is hereby approved for the following legally described property: Y (to be inserted) Adopted by the City Council this 11 th day of September 2012. Mark Hanus, Mayor Attest: City Clerk • • 2079 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 City of Mound Planning and Building Department (952) 472 -0604 • PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 30, 2012 SUBJECT: Expansion Permit Application —upper level removal /addition ADDRESS: 4606 Carlow Road APPLICANT: Steve Gravelle (on behalf of owner Jack Miller) PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 12 -17 ZONING: R -1A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential REQUEST The Planning Commission will review an expansion permit application from Steve Gravelle of Top Notch Construction, on behalf of owner, Jack Miller, to allow a house remodel project at 4606 Carlow Road • which includes removal of walls and roof of the existing story and a half and construction of new walls and roof to provide a full second story. The proposed new walls and roof modifications would be constructed over a portion of the existing building footprint which is nonconforming. SITE CONDITIONS There is an existing single family house and detached garage located on the property at 4606 Carlow Road. The subject property abuts the Commons on the east side which extends to Lake Minnetonka. The subject property is accessed by a driveway /road that extends from Carlow Road on to Kenmare Common. There are a number of existing nonconforming conditions associated with the subject property including, but not limited to, setbacks, hardcover and lack of street frontage. The proposed addition, which is being constructed over portion of the existing building footprint, is expanding the side setback condition on the south side as the subject wall is "going up ". However, the project does not change or expand the existing building footprint. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129.40 outlines the criteria for granting expansion permits in the City of Mound. As the Planning Commission may recall, these are new provisions which were adopted and went into effect in October 2010. Per City Code Section 129.2, an expansion permit is defined as follows: Expansion permit means a permit which is granted by the City Council for the expansion or enlargement of a nonconforming structure in accordance with Section 129 -40. • 1:1 • 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days unless an extension is executed in accordance with the state regulations. The expansion permit application was submitted on August 22, 2012 and deemed to be complete for review. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified by mailed notice. Planning Commission members are advised that this activity was completed on August 30, 2012 DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Copies of the application were forwarded to all City departments for review. All written comments which were received are summarized below: Public Works Superintendent Jim Fackler. No comment needed as project does not encroach on the Commons area. City Engineer Dan Faulkner The request indicates that the expansion will use the existing footprint so there would be no additional hard.surface. Due to the closeness of the adjacent homeowner's house at 4608 Carlow Road, precautions need to be taken to prevent any damage during construction; also, roof runoff should be contained in roof gutters and not directed on to adjacent owners' property. • Building Official Scott Qualle My concerns center on the building code issues that focus on distance of the structure from the lot line. The building code states that the distance from a structure to the lot line must be protected if it is within 5 feet. I have inserted a table that illustrates the requirements for each building element. S ection 302 Exterior Wall Location Ifire resismnce rated) I Houron the underside 2feet Projectitxls (Not fire- res�smncerated) a Hours 5 Feet NotAi4av ed N/A <3 Feet openings 25% Maxim an ofWatiArm 0 Horm 3F Aet Uniimited a Hours S Feet a. Imone ite4 III 2081 Of particular concern, is 1) the distance from the overhang (projection) to the lot line; and 2) the • openings in the wall adjacent to the lot line. If the projection is under 2 feet or the openings are under 3 feet, they are not allowed. The other construction elements (walls and penetrations) have options for fire resistive construction that can be addressed later. City Attorney Manderschied The applicant indicates that the existing property is nonconforming so any addition would have to comply with the requirements of City Code Section 129 -35. PUBLIC AGENCY COMMENTS A copy of the application and related materials was forwarded to the involved agencies for review including the MnDNR and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Staff received an email on B- 14 -2 -12 from District Technician Catherine Bach indicating that a MCWD permit will be needed if soil disturbance exceeds 5000 SF or 50 cubic yards of excavation or stockpiling. GENERAL DISCUSSION 1. Staff deemed the use of the submitted survey dated 10 -12 -00 and site plan prepared by the property owner and supporting materials acceptable for expansion review. As per Planning Commission policy, applicant should be advised that Staff, the Planning Commission and /or City Council reserve the right to require the submittal of additional information, as necessary, including but not limited to, supplemental and /or updated survey information to be provided by a professional surveyor. 2. A full copy of Ordinance No. 06 -2010, which includes the zoning amendments adopted in October 2010 related to variances /nonconformities /expansions, is on file with the City and will be provided upon request. A copy of City Code Section 129-40 (a) which includes the Expansion Permit description and criteria has been included. The subject site is over the 40 percent hardcover allowance which Staff deems to be an existing condition. As the expansion is being constructed within the existing building footprint, hardcover is not affected by the proposed remodel. 4. Per zoning code, eaves are allowed to encroach no more than 2 feet into setback areas. Gutters are exempt. A complete list of allowed encroachments is contained in City Code Chapter 129 -197 (c). See also Building Official comments in 'Department Comments" section in this report about building code regulations for structures within certain distances. 5. Applicant is advised that there are local and agency regulations related to grading, filling and /or site alteration in floodplain, shoreland and wetland areas, as applicable. • • 2082 • 6. Effective September 1 p , 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control are in effect; also others. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as rules regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant was advised to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed remodel /addition project. Future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance, as applicable, and or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. See comment from MCWD District Technician Catherine Bach in "Public Agency Comments" section earlier in this report regarding need for MCWD permitting. 7. The City is the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) related to the Wetland Conservation Act and is the responsible agency for wetland boundary determinations. 8. City Code requires the lowest floor of all structures, including basements and crawl spaces, be constructed at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or three (3) feet above the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of a wetland. The RPFE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approve an expansion permit for construction of an upper floor removal /addition project at 4606 Carlow Road at the September 11, 2012 meeting, if possible, subject to the following list of minimum conditions: • 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. 3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application, which may include but is not limited to, the submittal of revised building plans to specifically address openings, eaves and fire rating for the south wall of the proposed addition. The proposed project shall meet the provisions of the building code in all regards including, but not limited to, openings /projections for appurtenances /structures located within certain distances. Applicant shall work with Staff and the Building Official 4. An expansion permit granted will automatically expire and be of no further force and effect if no building permit has been issued within one year of the date of approval of the expansion permit unless an extension is approved pursuant to the regulations contained in City Code Section 129.40, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 5. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighbor's property. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit • issuance. 2083 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The • applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 9. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 10. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 11. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. The RPFE for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0. 12. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback or 100 -year floodplain area(s). 13. Any additional recommended conditions from Staff, consultants, agencies or the Planning • Commission. In recommending approval of the requested Expansion Permit, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 1. The requested construction is being constructed over a portion of the existing footprint of the existing house. 2. Conditions of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its September 4, 2012 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration /action at its Tuesday, September 11, 2012 meeting, if possible. • r HMO 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 EXPANSION PERMIT APPLICATION Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952- 472 -0620 RIM Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of a lica l y 4 pp tiori' Case No. Please Noe or nrint le ibl SUBJECT Address 06 PROPERTY LEGAL Lot a3 Block /A DESC. Subdivision PID # Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Cirde one) PROPERTY Name Email OWNER Address Phone Home 9,%2 - 2 7o - 12/ / Work — l `� +C'je f ` Email APPLICANT Name a 'v.&R & f. ,vim (IF OTHER THAN Address '4�SS ,Qe1scnv0 Aj 1yjr-,� OWNER) Phone Home Work X63 - WY - 39 Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (A- If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): o m(Nv U.t a t s boo -�n� sAwR4 1w.k -�' � A5 t vtQ w t, CCs ' • 2 Expansion Permit Information 2085 (6/27/2011) Page 4 of 6 Case No. 2111 3. Please complete the following information related to the property ana dul(dmg's conformity witn the • zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. NW4 i VC) hm- cmfi (Yittn .t SETBACKS Front Yard: (N S E W ) Side Yana: (N S E W ) Side Yard: (N S E W ) Rear Yard: (N S E W ) Lakeside: (N S E W ) (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: REQUIRED ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. REQUESTED EXPANSION (or existing) ft. ft. ft. ft. u� ft. ft. ft. ft. sill ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes( ),No t*A-. If no, specify each non - conformity: S k de se- bg, � i -�>suc-s off , �NdA C&P-0 aaYS . 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: ('Ooo narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( small ( ) drainage (4existing situation ( ) too shallow (i�shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: • • Expansion Permit Information 2086 (6/27/2011) Page 5 of 6 Case No. �. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No If yes, explain: 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circa tances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (yes, explain: 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( q,"No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Si V plicanfs w Sig Date 12 Signature Date U/23711 Expansion Permit Information 2087 (6/27/2011) Page 6 of 6 r lcx r f re i� a d e I - w 7 -tr-- -gVi`l c: 3 1�1+'� -( I, rt r� 4 ;fit ? -. K Al 1 C 1 C L C�C"��RRYac �' _ ° ) v-t� �' i? 1�Lj l r��+ - ( a r G .sue L+� _ C� •5� 11C?✓i fs L° -vt e ,5 w r ( ) tr �.Kbless 4 . VV '• RECD AUG 42 o a p mt et't N 5.9 ao 18.2 cv i5 fir; f< 2 0 SINGLE '�� - •• to .,. f r-r- Pe rt) • FAMILY � 0 HOUSE #4606 •�, 43 A r ea t tip MA ..; .•F ® N ahs;dc� PF p 2,25' 1.5 2 .9 co NOT TO SCALE $$g 3 ENLARGED TO SHOW DMIL K 0 I* 10 0o d, of UI 10.0 FN ,4.01 1 I f .W D� N. 0 0 i I I I GARAGE ' 4.3 I I O �. Oti � LE GEN D ® IRON MONUMENT FOUND ® IRON MONUMENT SET —x —x— FENCE LINE 41REP Y THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, ARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT AT I AM A DULY REGISTERED N rN A THE SO .12 - 00 REG_NO. 293 —X� f. — 66.00 r f • , x . I � O ,.s z I Gt dri 1:• I f 1 \ Z � f 4r r kL z t� t r1 �gg 3 4 0 4� o_ AL a ' J r a uj L J 0 I P Y t 209 PI I I J " I9 D 4 E � z gl� el 1 K � S 0 w L r dy - s�w+�,4ij5 n5n I P Y t 209 PI I I J " I9 D 4 E � z gl� el ON /SINN., c/EEyan�Co.. Gi ✓i% E�ineers . Vll s office the. ZZ-0 c!wK4k j -.1 ftlr 1 W Q V V V41 m l HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) • PROPERTY A DDESS: 5 CQ r I o L3 R a OWNER'S NAME: 15 0, t /Y&;Z LOT AREA 5 SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... LOT AR SO. FT. X 40% _ (for Lots of Record) ............................. 31 4, t� " Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE ? `� X .1 Al = S .24 DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE/SHED) £G.2 x Std = /�9 .1v A /.S x Ff•) iSo,S3 TOTALHOUSE .................... ............................... -aL X a,6 = C)6 X 7/.S-,V TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... 6 DRIVEWAY, AY PARKING x 30 = d • AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. x X = TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ......... ............................... bbd DECKS Open decks (1/4° min. x Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not x = counted as hardcover. X = TOTALDECK ........................ ............................... /-3 X = _ X = TOTALOTHER ..................... ............................... TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .................... ............................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ............................. ............................... PREPARED BY 2092 6 q� DATE �` —�6 —/� • Revised 01/12110 ZONING (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the • practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. (b) Procedure. (1) The person applying for a variance shall fill out and submit to the planning staff a variance request form. A site plan with a certificate of survey must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity showing the following information: a. Location and dimensions of 1. Lot; 2. Building; 3. Driveways; and 4. Off- street parking spaces. b. Distance between: 1. Building and front, side, and rear lot lines; 2. Principal building and accessory buildings; 3. Principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. C. The location of signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. d. Any additional information as may be reasonably required by the • planning staff and applicable sections of this zoning chapter. (2) The planning staff shall refer the application to the Planning Commission for review. (3) The Planning Commission must take action on the application in accordance with the timelines established by statute for land use applications. If it recommends for the variance, it may also recommend conditions it considers necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. (4) Upon receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission or within 60 days after referral of the application for a variance to the Planning Commission, if no recommendation has been transmitted, the Council may place the request on the agenda. The Council may grant variances only in situations where it determines that the applicant has satisfied the requirements of the City Code Sub. 129.39(a). (5) Whenever a variance has been considered and denied by the City Council, a similar application and proposal for a variance shall not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for at least one (1) year from the date of its denial, unless a decision to reconsider such matter is made by the City Council. (c) The Council may impose any reasonable condition in the granting of such variances in order to insure compliance with this chapter, or to protect adjacent property. Any condition imposed must be directly related to and must bear rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. (Ord. 03 -2011, 10 -23 -2011) • Sec. 12940. Expansion Permit. 0A (a) Criteria An expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner whom this chapter imposes practicer difficnitics 2093 12921 ZONING to the property owner in the reasonable use of the land. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the applicant must satisfy the City Council that the fouo., �rieA =t: • (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off-street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. (b) Procedure. (1) The person applying for the expansion permit shall fill out and submit to the planning staff an expansion permit request form with fee as required by City Code Section 101. A site plan with a certificate of survey must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity showing the following information: a. Location and dimensions of I. Lot; 2. Building; 3. Driveways; and • 4. Off- street parking spaces. b. Distance between: 1. Building and front, side, and rear lot lines; 2. Principal building and accessory buildings; . 3. Principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. C. The location of signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. d. Any additional information as may be reasonably required by the planning staff and applicable sections of this zoning chapter. (2) The planning staff shall refer the application to the Planning Commission for review. If it recommends approval of the expansion permit, it may include conditions it considers necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare and the essential character of the neighborhood. (3) Upon receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission the Council may place the request on the agenda for formal review. If it grants an expansion permit, the Council may impose any reasonable condition in order to insure compliance with this chapter, or to protect adjacent property. If no recommendation has been transmitted by the Planning Commission within 60 days of the date of the application, the Council, at its discretion, may place the request on the agenda for review. Action on a request for an expansion permit shall be in accordance with the timeline established in Minnesota Statutes 15.99. (c) Term of Expansion permit. An expansion permit granted will automatically expire and be of no further force and effect if no building permit has been issued within one year of the date of • approval of the expansion permit. The applicant may petition for an extension of time in which to have a building permit issued Such extension shall be requested in writing and filed 2094 129M ZONING with the Building Official at least thirty (30) days before the expiration of the original • expansion permit. It is the applicant's responsibility to monitor the ap "*;. oPrh- expao.�o.a permit. There shall be no charge for the filing of such petition. The request for extension shall state facts demonstrating a good faith attempt to complete the expansion as permitted in the expansion permit. Such petition shall be presented to the Planning Commission for a recommendation to the City Council for decision. Once the project is completed as approved, the expansion permit becomes perpetual subject to the limitations contained in Section 12940 or in the expansion permit itself. The structure authorized by the expansion permit will be treated in all respects as a nonconforming structure. (d) Whenever an expansion permit has been considered and denied by the City Council, a similar application and proposal for an expansion permit shall not be considered again by the Planning Commission or City Council for at least one (1) year from the date of its denial, unless a decision to reconsider such matter is made by the City Council. (e) Speck project. The expansion permit is only valid for the project for which it was granted. Construction of any project must be in substantial compliance with the building plans and specifications reviewed and approved by the City Council. (f) Recording. A certified copy of the expansion permit must be filed by the applicant with the Hennepin County recorder or the Hennepin County registrar of titles. The expansion permit must contain a legal description of the property affected. 2095 129M (Code 1987, § 350.530; Ord. No. 61 -1993, § 350.530,2-23-1994; Ord. No. 06-2010,10-24-2010) State law reference — Variances, Minn. Stab. § 462.357, subd. 6(2). Secs. 129-41-129-66. Reserved. • ARTICLE 13L ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED; ZONING MAP See. 129-67. Zoning districts. For the purpose of this chapter, the city is hereby divided into the following use districts: R -1 Single - family residential district R -1A Single - family residential district R -2 Two - family residential district R -3 Multiple - family residential district B -1 Central business district B -2 General business district B -3 Neighborhood business district PED -PUD Pedestrian planned unit development district DEST -PUD Destination planned unit development district L-PUD Linear planned unit development district I -1 Light industrial district CON Conservation district (Code 1987, § 350.605; Ord. No. 61 -1993, § 350.605,2-23-1994) 2095 129M Consulting Engineers & Surveyors ' 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 • Phone (952) 44 &8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com September 6, 2012 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement Project City Project Nos. PW- 12 -01, 12 -03, 12 -04 Pay Request No. 4 Dear Ms. Hanson: Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 4 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work. completed on • the 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from July 28, 2012 through August 27, 2012. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $662,312.55 to GMH Asphalt Corporation. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pau.sche, Director of Finance • 2096 DATE: 915/2012 • CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 4 2012 STREET IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTOR GMH Asphalt Corp. OWNER City of Mound CITY PROJECT NOS. PW -12- 01,12-03,12 -04 ENGINEER Bolton & Monk BMI PROJECT NO. C12.103970 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 7128/2012 THROUGH 8/27/2012 TOTAL AMOUNT BID........: ..._... . ...... ......... .:.. ....... ......... $ 3,542,611.88 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS :..; ...: ........ ..... .......... ..... :................ - C URRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT., .:. .:....... ..: : .. ....... ,:::. :,:... ,. ., .. ,..;...., ;... $ 3,542,611.68 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE .......................... ......... .............. .... :........; :,, $ 1,769,01$.55 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO - DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED... ;...::,... $ - TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS,,.__, .....: ....... .........:.. .._,,. :.., ... $ 1,789,019.55 RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 5% ) $ 88,450.98 TOTAL AMOUNT Of OTHER DEDUCTIONS,. _...... ....... :........... .....<...... ..,.._........ _......,.............,. $ NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE :... ......: ,.., _,.,- _ $ 1,6611,568.57 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES .., ,:;:.... $ 1:018,258.02 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO.4..... _.:. .:.... ,. $ 882.312.55 • Certificate for Payment 1 hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all Claims against me by mason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: GMH Asphalt Corporation 9180 Lake Town Road Chaska, MN 55318 By Name Title Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS , 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 !3y .� / 7 PROJECT ENGINEER Daniel L. Faulkner 4 Date 9 141 / '� L APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner. CITY OF MOUND By Name Title Date • 2097 c . Cnnsufting Engineers & Surveyors ` I 2638 Shadow lane, Suite 200 - Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com September 5, 2012 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2013 Street Improvement Project Ordering of Feasibility Report City Project Nos. PW -13 -01 & PW -13 -02 Dear Mayor and Council Members: 1 P-1J(=*6 • Beginning in 2003 the City has completed annual residential street improvement projects (with the exception of 2010) in accordance with MN Statutes Chapter 429, special assessments, and the City's street assessment policy. These statutes require the preparation of a Feasibility Report to define the project scope, preliminary cost, estimated assessment amounts and anticipated schedule. Only the street • related portions of the improvement are assessed as any utility work is funded by the respective utility fund. The Five -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) identifies the Southeast (SE) Island Area and Three Points Boulevard as the street, utility and retaining wall improvement project areas to be completed in 2013. The SE Island Area is the only remaining neighborhood in the City's Street Reconstruction Program yet to be completed and is very similar in scope to the current 2012 North Island project. Three Points Boulevard is on the City's Municipal State Aid (MSA) street system and would be the first city initiated MSA street project. MSA funds would only be used to meet the state aid requirements of extra width and depth on Three Points Boulevard. Benefitting property owners would only be assessed for the standard City street section in accordance with the City's Assessment Policy. The cost estimates included in the Five -year CIP are broad based estimates that are beneficial for planning purposes. The CIP total project cost estimates (includes utility and retaining wall improvements and 30 percent indirect costs) for each area is as follows: Three Points Boulevard, $2,432,000 ($380,000 MSA funds); SE Island Area, $4,566,000. The current 2012 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements (not including the lift station) was estimated at $4,856,000. If the Council wants to proceed with both project areas in 2013, this would be the largest reconstruction effort to date. City staff feels that delaying the Three Points Boulevard project to 2014, while necessitating additional street maintenance, would be acceptable if this is the Council's desire. r'\MOUMC 12.037921 • DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer 2098 Name Date t Page 2 • Separate resolutions have been prepared for your consideration directing Bolton & Menk, Inc. to prepare the required Feasibility Report for the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements. The Report would include either, both project areas, or only the SE Island Area, per the Council's directive. In addition, we are requesting authorization to also proceed with the topographic survey work necessary for the design of the project either now or upon completion of the Feasibility Report. This would enable us to complete this work more efficiently prior to potential adverse weather conditions if done later this fall. We sincerely appreciate the Council's consideration of these requests to prepare the Feasibility Report and commence the necessary design survey work. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer • • F:WOUN\C 123792 1 \2012-09-05 2013 Street Project Reqt Fear Study.doc 2099 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT FOR THE 2013 STREET, UTILITY, AND • RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — SE ISLAND AREA WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve: Aberdeen Road Island View Drive to Devon Lane Bedford Road Wilshire Boulevard West to End Bradford Lane Wilshire Boulevard to Richmond Road Burns Road Donald Drive to Drury Lane Clyde Road Island View Drive to Tuxedo Boulevard Cumberland Road Stratford Lane to Devon Lane Devon Lane Island View Drive to Tuxedo Boulevard Devon Lane South of Canterbury Road to Richmond Road Donald Drive Tuxedo Boulevard to Devon Lane Dorchester Road Devon Lane East to End Dorchester Road Tuxedo Boulevard to Stratford Lane Drury Lane Tuxedo Boulevard to Cumberland Road Essex Lane Wilshire Boulevard South to End Gordon Road Donald Drive to Drury Lane Hampton Road Drury Lane East to End Hanover Road Island View Drive West to End Inverness Lane Tuxedo Boulevard North to End Lamberton Road Island View Drive to Tuxedo Boulevard Manchester Road Tuxedo Boulevard to Island View Drive Manchester Road Tuxedo Boulevard to Devon Lane Montgomery Road Wilshire Boulevard East to End Paisley Road Drury Lane North to End Radnor Road Island View Drive West to End Richmond Road Devon Lane East to End Roanoke Lane Island View Drive to Aberdeen Road Stirling Road Tuxedo Boulevard to Inverness Lane Stratford Lane Cumberland Road North to End Suffolk Road Essex Lane East and West to End NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: • That the proposed improvement be referred to Bolton & Menk, Inc. for study and that they are instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council this 11 day of September, 2012. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • 2100 • CITY OF MOUND — RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT FOR THE 2013 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT – THREE POINTS BOULEVARD WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Three Points Boulevard, from Commerce Boulevard East to the end, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: That the proposed improvement be referred to Bolton & Menk, Inc. for study and that they are instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Adopted by the City Council this 11 day of September, 2012. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • Mayor Mark Hanus 2101 MEMORANDUM Date: September 6, 2012 To: City Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche Finance Director /Treasurer Subject: Resolution to Adopt New Debt Service Schedules for G.O. Improvement Bonds and Equipment Certificates BACKGROUND The exercise that started in 2009 continues each year to analyze whether or not we are levying the correct amount on our general obligation debt. The City of Mound is in its 9"' year of a 10- year street improvement project (not including MSA streets). When we bond for the annual project, we assume we will special assess to the abutting property owners 2 /3rds of the cost and the City will levy 1 /3rd of the cost to repay the debt. We assume the special assessments to property owners will be certified to taxes over 15 years and charged interest, although we give the property owners a chance to "pre -pay" the assessment and not have it go on their taxes, therefore not be charged interest. The original bond covenant contains debt service schedules that reflect these assumptions. It is not possible to know the exact amount that will be assessed or how many property owners will prepay. From 2003 — 2008, no prepays were assumed although approximately 20% of property owners have prepaid, and many others pay off the balance as the property changes hands. Since 2009, we have factored in some prepayments in the debt service assumptions, but adjustments to the original debt service schedules are still necessary. Cities are allowed to levy more than the original debt service scheduled called for anytime, but the Council is required to pass a resolution authorizing staff to do so. We have recalculated the debt service schedules incorporating the actual amount of special assessments, both those that were prepaid, and those that are outstanding. We have also tried to even out the levy amount and eliminate large swings from year to year while providing for the statutory requirement to have 105% of the following year's debt service in cash as of January 1. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council approve the attached resolution adopting the revised debt service levy schedules for the remainder of the debt service. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this matter at (952)472 -0633. • • • 2102 CITY OF MOUND • RESOLUTION NO. -2012 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CHANGES TO DEBT SERVICE LEVY SCHEDULES AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS IN THE DEBT SERVICE FUND FOR BOND SERIES 2009A, 2009C, 2009D, 2011B, 2012A, 2012B WHEREAS, the City of Mound has issued General Obligation Equipment Certificates to capital purchases in the General Fund and Area Fire Services Fund; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has issued General Obligation Improvement Bonds in association with its annual street improvement project; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has pledged its full faith, credit and taxing powers to the payment of principle and interest on the Bonds and Certificates; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The revised debt schedules for the bond issues described in Exhibit A replace the original bond service levy schedules for the remaining life of the bond 2. The revised debt levy schedule contained in Exhibit A be submitted to the County • Auditor to replace the information currently in the County's bond registers 3. The City of Mound will levy special debt levies according to the schedules provided in Exhibit A Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of September, 2012. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • 2103 r-� V1 10 n T n 'n e0 N v 0 h w - O h • h C, N V7 w h h p+ M O W ^ OO O O� VJ m V1 v1 O M a O ^'" '�'� b� n 'n M M N M V7 V1 a0 M M .-+ V7 N N VJ h h N v Vl p, V7 n O h M v a �^ M 7 0 h 10 v1 n 0 O� a2 M F n IR a0 cl O C - N N C-i O a N a, n h �) a M N .-+ N N N N N N N N N W W iYi n m W O P-4 6 4J .a W N •� r cd O N p"P N Ga k a A NAu O F� �3 ^ M � � O d G V N r7 F V r N � P � a r V N N k d N C H � C 0.l c c N P 7 C N V 13 d 0 h r N � P d r c � V h CL 0 � � C a F W a n O� �a k O � �W U N c) CN N 'n -�t 7 n � O m n b 7 m h o0 0 VJ O M Vt O M O h N OD Vi N -• O O� M u1 a a O l' V'� � a VJ �p o0 N M b n O M O CN N v1 M O a w N h h OO OO 00 00 --2 ^ N N m M M n O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' O O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn o0 00 0o ao � o0 00 00 00 00 N N ao a0 vl O O O O O O O 0 0 O �.,n000000000000 O In %0 b 10 b b� b b 10� ' al = 0000000000 ' ' ' ' A v C O O O O O O O O O M O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O v v v v v v v v v v v v v M Vl O� O� O M M V1 V7 0 M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 Vl V1 00 M O M 00 M V7 n M h M O+ N C, M M M ON ll h VJ V7 [� O O N 'n N h 0 0 O M C; N a M t t��l M M M M M N N ^' v O o o O o O O v 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O lc � lc lc lc lc � lc lc lc lc \C N , p vi W) � vn v v v) v v vn v v1 n . A N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 o 0 0 0 O 0 o O o O O o 0 o O O o 0 0 C 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o ao 000000 w= w 0000 o O o 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0o a0 O0 NN NNNNNN h u1 h kn V7 10 �o 17 VJ �c 1 0 �o C I O O O C D O O O O O O 0 0 0 o O 0 O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N n W W 00 O O O O�0 W W o o 'n 'n h V r- --T N 'n 10 n N N N N f �tl 'V N N oososossooAOOOc 4NOo N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U U- LL O d 3 L a d O LL Z W Z co W co W ¢ U W a H U W O a F a U 08 cn 0 Z O m F d W r4M� C7 • I * �o O V) 00 M 00 M M 00 00 M 00 00 �o O O h 00 v) O O w o0 %o o� t� o0 •-+ M M O cl O ( - C � 'dam N [� tV •�Y T ni t� O M �o t� D\ 01 a, D\ DD � � C ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R O o C C C C C C C C C C C C C .d vl v) O O h O O vl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p •v O o N N M a a kn �o h w O\ O •--� /y p N N N N N N N N N N N N M M ^ • L ' 10 N •-+ M eP 10 00 O ^ M v) h W O N 01 •-- V' Q\ O) et O of O kn O h ^ 10 = �v v) O 00 h r^ 00 O N M v) 1 0 00 o w ^ N o0 h eY O O • 10 O 10 et M M M N N •--� 0 0 0 00 M rn M M M M M M v D\ M M U V) h h N N ^ O o1 O N Cl) O � M it U r.+ p y .�. N DD N v'i 01 ^ M 'o 'o v1 O M v) •-� M h O O M h �O N V) cn •--� O cn N N N N V N N N N N N N N N V p � � A U w U > a N N_ M 10 00 O ^ M v) h w O N 'n v) O W) 10 0 N p ' v) h o0 M 00 M M o0 00 M 00 00 10 O O \.o L N N h 00 10 00 �o ^ M a0 00 00 V7 O O M ' It N M �O o0 DD N v) N It ^ (2 h W r Ja o0 00 O O�t N O r ^-• ao (7\ O O O W 10 c o n o . .N-i N N N N N N N N^ ^ N N N^ ••� C ;b p h M M M M M M M M M M M M M M P4 F d Pa W p d C' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' aJ o�n00000000000000 .� v) N O O O O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O �o \D 1 D 1 0 1D 10 \o �0 10 �o �0 10 w v) v) v) v) v) v) v) v) V) kn v) v) V1 In •� d N �O Vl N'1 v) vl w) v'1 v) V'1 V1 y1 vl v) h C y � M N N C N N N N N N N N N O W � � �o O V) 00 M 00 M M 00 00 M 00 00 �o O O h 00 v) O O w o0 %o o� t� o0 •-+ M M O cl O ( - C � 'dam N [� tV •�Y T ni t� O M �o t� D\ 01 a, D\ DD � � C ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R O o C C C C C C C C C C C C C .d vl v) O O h O O vl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p •v O o N N M a a kn �o h w O\ O •--� /y p N N N N N N N N N N N N M M ^ • L ' 10 N •-+ M eP 10 00 O ^ M v) h W O N 01 •-- V' Q\ O) et O of O kn O h ^ 10 = �v v) O 00 h r^ 00 O N M v) 1 0 00 o w ^ N o0 h eY O O • 10 O 10 et M M M N N •--� 0 0 0 00 M rn M M M M M M v h h M b r- M M +.a it U r.+ O p p U > a N N_ M 10 00 O ^ M v) h w O N 'n v) O W) 10 R+ p D\ .�-r o\ 7 O vt O . - . N O oo O N "� n C, O N M 'n ' o0 U o1 v) CD 10 M C1 'n ^ h M O 10 N 00 lzr O ^ ^ O O O (71 01 00 00 00 c o n o . .N-i � � h p 0 d Pa p C' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' U X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O O �o \D 1 D 1 0 1D 10 \o �0 10 �o �0 10 U N �O Vl N'1 v) vl w) v'1 v) V'1 V1 y1 vl v) h C y � M N N C N N N N N N N N N Ca .hr N � a 0 0 o C _ M 00 O D\ v) N �o �_ M � 00 Q\ o U h v'� N N •- O o\ O N m O v) � p ut N DD N v'^ D` •-• M 10 v^ 10 10 vn D^ M v1 ^ M h O O M v) aO N 7 •--� v) M O R h m 00 M V) 10 00 Q\ Q\ M •-• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N q e � F. 0 o N a O M •� p O � U U � V o1 O_ •-•� Ut � (_� DD a\ O N M 7 ut �'•� M _N _M .�. O ON 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o N N N N N N N N N N 2105 V W Rl h h M b r- M M w Y L Y a s v QU ' V1 V1 N1 Vl N'1 O O O O O O un N l b O 10 O M V1 M V M M rn o 0 M M M M M O C c cd P4 w ° o ° O o ° 41 d •� a O I 5C w q ' r Vl V7 _M N r N [- N n O O O iY. vn O� a 131� N l � O� O oo 10 01 w Y CL d ' h V V1 w O O 'n � O O O N N w O O N I O O O N 10 q .�. ••• O O� l� �O �Y c+i �+i --� O Y C� a —00.00.0000 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •p vi vi 'n O O ut vi O O O p •� 'n vi in �D �D N N M M M O p 01 01 O V N Y L Y C W H Y p p Y Y • Y u d y V O O r N cc Y V Y M V�1 V N . L :6 G I i F v W O C7 o ^ ^ ^ o u r- r- r- r- N o 0 0 0 0 kn ^' C N O+ 'C O kn n p N I Y • Z � 01 O •� N _M ^ 'n �O � O O� N �+ i€ Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 d > >t N N N N N N N N N N N C Uwao.°. U 411 N �o N 00 t- w , n O, eh �D V7 of M N -+ O O+ 00 t- 1 .0 as N t` C, t` V t� et �O O M O� M M �D et O 00 M N M O� Y1 �O O M d O M y ' \o tl t� N •--� 00 O -e \0 ,-� D; M N b N O1 • t` a0 a O+ O O N �' •.• 'n eh m M m -• M N N M M N ••+ --' M t- 00 -r D1 n ++ O� h M t- Oi 1 �0 t- N , n N O N -e O �o O v', -Rt N to N N •cl' - -Zl - to O, 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D N N N N N N N .••, •-+ N N N N N M M M M en M M m M M M M M M M 4-4 N d O �t K W G) M41 O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ++ L M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M Ifs V� 1/'1 ,n ,n kn , n ,n , n vl vl v1 v1 ,n , n V1 ,n ,n �u w N �a L .p ' , n , n , n _O 'n , n 0 00 �n OO_OO_O W)ww 41 _OOOO_O 00 W Y h M t� 'O N N O� O , n N l� D1 [� O h Ow M " � y k C V 00 ". M 7; 00 V'i 4 O M �D 00 O N 7 v 'e M N -� O, �o ,n ,n �n q* a' N t` \0 V1 M •--� er1 •r� V: W O u O v M M •.• O O O1 00 -. -r -.� -. — -. -. -r -. — -r M Pa a � ~ rr W F' Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O O - kn Cr h C- O 0 T O O L' •Gr O+ W) �D 0 0 N to 0 (7 O --� •-- ,--� --� --� --� N N N N N N N N N M • L a 4 M 07 b � C N cd 00 N 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vi w '7 � 00 e} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t� , n O " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C' O t to t Vl kn to to to V1 Vl to to to kn O O O O O O O �y E. C • N N N � t- t O\ C7, N N P h N N t- ,n \0 �O t- t- 00 00 ... ~ N .-. N N N N N M M M M 'e N N N N N N N N N • d U u L d w G � O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N rl Ol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O V O vi - - to to ,n vi ,n vi to W) ,n vi vn ,n a+ 00 C _ 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 e 1* It 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W C t� tl -, O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N u u ON O\ 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N O� N 'n ,n t- t- O O kn ,n O O , n ,n �c �O t t- 00 00 My ~ N N N N N N N N N N L I..I d L u = ' v 000000000000 �tv0000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F a ov'ttC>00000000 O L F N CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N V' a O O O O O O -N M �D eh e} CN eh et 1�0 -•+ .-� . n = 0 1. t - N ID N w t - 00 , n C7\ -' b ' r 4 M N O O1 -� 12 t% `tt� t% " b O M O , M M \D "t O 00 M N R v+ 7 M It � h t- N •-+ 00 O O\ M N 10 N 01 V A C oe U [� 00 It �D .•r O O N 'eF •-r O� .-• M D\ N 0, d' OO •--� N N N N M M v1 V' M M N O O ti C d �i • O Ifj • C " M d a+ L N M N' vl 1 �0 t- 00 (71 O N M V h b t- 00 Ol O -• N N N N N M M � Q i U+- ww� C; v 2107 M t- 00 -r D1 n u Vl V) M 00 00 V) sf eF p N n v^ O M ut m M 00 �D O� ^-' Q .W. try M O oo N �O �6 IA N M a N v a E N N t M ' C 7 V1 In ' ' M V a AU c C, V g 0 0, V1 D\ N 0, Q\ P O 'o T b vl N %0 N �o 'n �D O o�Drn D -u rn o--I VnIO E N m O O O O- oo N O 00 M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H p I g 44 O Ln C1 w R1 W d' . W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 0 0 0 V V 'n kn Ln ) V1 VI V V1 V1 'n Vn " vn VI VI Dvva vo.vvrna'no.N o a rno 'D Ol D\ b 'n N 00 t- r �D Vl N st M N -� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N O p 00 M 'n �o N .r. n O M (71 vj O M N N O O O T a\ w 00 r w C Y N N F Q el 401 *I q Y p � Y p V O 0 a 04 O 0 M .--i O, L'- V1 ' O'D N 00 4 a N MM I.I D\ N O\ M M M 2 O+ O� 00 D\ T O+ 00 C 00 Ol ol Q, 00 - 2. .... .-. .-. — .-. — — — .--i .-. .r .-. rr O 0 0 O Y v) l� 00 M 'n o0 V1 tt N 00 O d' N M O Y in h M �D N O N[- 'n O M M V I ,� O O e p p . - . V1 • - ; M O o0 N �D �o r- N M V N V) 1 O+ 7 M 'n \O N kn r n V) Vf Vn Vl kn Vl V1 M Z Qa � E q �k co 0 p m O !F r p O p N M h b N o0 N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'rot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 C� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q C; U � 2108 el 401 *I n.i 10, - M �O a1 N O - g M M O\ N N V1 et O eF M n 0, M O, n - � N O O N 0 O\ N Qn v1 n M 0 C O Do �- On I M a N� N M O N b ' O .Nr vi = n N O -,n C-4 oNO O -n M 2 • � .-. ... N N N N N N N N r. .r .-i rr .-. A U n m - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �o vn 00 " M �O y y i n n n N N N n n N n O, , O, N O 4 1 D ^• et r O N a* n �O n -- t r-� 00 r v� al v1 00 0o n oo n n n n n n n n u CL v W b0 g N ca W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 O o o O o 0 0 o O o 0 o 0 0 0 o �n v1 v1 .n kn kn v1 v1 v) v1 kn w) vi v1 vi w) L � .0 7 bA v Ul b 00 D1 .•. N d' � n oo O M Ul �O o0 �i d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O �O V1 00 h M�o W Y % d b n n n N N N n n N n O\ vl O N O y( r W 7 y C L NlO lO O� N V1 n O^ O N O\ N M N O N oo vi M � N D; b N C\ to r N V1 - M M M N N N � C N d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O � vl V'1 Vl O O O V1 �fl O V1 V1 O Vj O V1 Qa ' • � O y y � O � L ' M M M M 00 eh O O1 O �O O\ V1 O h 01 O M '-+ O\ N(71 n 0 \O 01 O h v1 N Vl n 00 d' DD V1 lD N Ol cl d' N O On r-� cl ON M 00 00 M t- N N N N Vn eh M 0 0 M 01 00 00 00 n n n n n �O \O \D \O \D vi n n n .Nr � O y y � L O C � g N d C7 v Y � 7 Ul b 00 D1 .•. N d' � n oo O M Ul �O o0 y Y % d d � Y n i NIC W) ' M 00 d' .� N o0 V. Vn --� 1n O .�• M 'n 10 ON �o et �Q M h n M v1 �O n n O C7 0 D1 N N vl O 0 O V r- M O1 n N O O N 0 O1 vl N a Go Ig �' h M N h V_ [� N_ Q\ h N N O M 00 Y3 C O N N N N N N N N � 7 � � N = ti a N O O IA • L p p M V'1 `O n o0 O N M 11 V1 1O n oo H N d .Ni .r .-1 �--� �--� N N N N N N N N N 11 + = ,+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j� C C 7 p " N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 v w'o°a� 2109 n n n .Nr W O n d bA cd a Qi 1J W .w Y O, 0+ �c t 'D t t N N M1 'n M '� N N O M w vi �o O` 'n w O m N AU 2110 • • 01 o,000OOOOOOO ' o' i lc t •-• •• �D Iq lD O � -• N N O ^-� �o M ON t t N ON O 10 y : t N N N M N M t t t M1 Ha t u d' ►e h tr W Y N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L Y In i a+ O Y o N N N N N N N N N N U ^g u Y wa f C n 7 a 'fl Y "cf O 00 'D M O, t 00 M t VI p0 d kn t t t M M N N --' 00 GG e N = o a a, a, rno,o, c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CD O O O O 'n O h 'n to C to V 00 M1 M1 00 O N M N p L . m m N M M M M M t Qa '6 d a CD 0 C C C C C C C C C C c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 2110 • • 01 o,000OOOOOOO ' o' m N t t t t t t t t t o N kq O� (7� W r+ N Ha t N N h tr Y N N ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c t t t t t t t t t t c O\ � O� C O Y o N N N N N N N N N N U ^g u Y wa f a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c r = o a a, a, rno,o, c 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o c .p D O GG 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 c CD 0 C C C C C C C C C C c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C c �c Y a 0 c� e 0 C Y O4 O+ t �D t .-� t N N M1 V cq 0 In C O v O oo 'D rn N 'n � M N t t yj W N O In O. M M1 t M1 O, N N N M M t t t t N C W ► e �a ti O ��Orr y L y p Y M V t a0 D\ _ � N L Vl W .N• _M .M1 . h . N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N a O u C� N 2110 • • 01 • AMENDMENT TO LOCAL PROGRAMMING FACILITIES AGREEMENT This Amendment to Local Programming Facilities Agreement (this "Amendment ") is entered into as of this _ day of September, 2012, by and between the City of Mound, Minnesota, (the "City "), and the Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission ( "LMCC "). RECITALS A. The City and LMCC entered into that certain Local Programming Facilities Agreement dated April 1, 2000 (the "Agreement "). B. The City and LMCC have agreed to amend the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: Section IIA. of the Agreement is amended to read: PEG Access Fee to Be Paid to LMCC. The current franchisee in the City, Mediacom, collects a PEG access fee in the amount of $.84 per subscriber in the City, per billing period. The City will increase the PEG access fee to $1.21 effective 1/1/2013. Mediacom provides • the PEG access fee to the City on a quarterly basis. The City agrees to remit the PEG access fee to the LMCC for PEG access programming. In addition, the City will pay up to $.75 per subscriber, per billing period from its franchise fee to the LMCC, for a total payment of up to $ 1.96 per subscriber, per billing period. The City will remit this amount to the LMCC within thirty (30) days of receipt of the PEG access fee and franchise fee payment from Mediacom. The LMCC will use said fees exclusively for support of PEG access obligations required hereunder. 2. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts that together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. This Amendment may be delivered by facsimile transmittal or other electronic communication of signed original counterparts. 3. Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective on January 1, 2013. 4. Amendment. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. • 2111 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2013 PRELIMINARY GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,972,144 ; SETTING THE PRELIMINARY LEVY AT $5,548,708 ; AND APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY OVERALL BUDGET FOR 2013. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following preliminary 2013 General Fund Budget appropriation: TOTAL GENERAL FUND 4,972,144 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the County Auditor to levy the following preliminary taxes for collection in 2013: SPECIAL LEVIES Fire Relief G.O. Tax Increment 2003C G.O. Improvement 2005A G.O. Improvement 2006A G.O. Improvement 2007A G.O. Improvement 2008B G.O. Improvement 2009A G.O. Equipment Certificates 2009C G.O. Tax Increment 2009D Dump Bonds G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011A G.O. Improvement 2011 B G.O. Improvement 2012A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2012B PUBLIC SFTY BLDG Total Special Levies PRELIMINARY REVENUE LEVY Preliminary Certified Levy 83,782 45,000 85,000 58,000 128,000 63,000 215,600 46,675 214,400 376,923 191,105 113,181 349,000 1,969,666 3,579,042 5,548,708 • • • 2112 • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the preliminary overall budget for 2013 as follows: GENERAL FUND As per above 4,972,144 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Area Fire Service Fund 1,082,461 Dock Fund 154,734 HRA Transit District Maintenance Fund 50,800 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1,287,995 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Recycling Fund 198,694 Liquor Fund 620,129 Water Fund 1,743,013 Sewer Fund 2,036,841 • Storm Water Utility Fund 390,778 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 4,989,455 SUMMARY General Fund 4,972,144 Special Revenue Funds 1,287,995 Enterprise Funds 4,989,455 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 11,249,594 Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of September, 2012. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • 2113 CITY OF MOUND • RESOLUTION NO. 12 -XX RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEVY NOT TO EXCEED $191,194 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469, OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE YEAR 2013 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the governing body of the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a resolution from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound, entitled "Resolution Authorizing The Levy of a Special Benefit Levy Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.033, Subdivision 6 and Approval of a Budget for Fiscal Year 2013 "; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, must by resolution consent to the proposed tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that a special tax be levied upon real and personal property within the City of Mound in the amount not to exceed $191,194, or the maximum amount allowed. • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said levy, not to exceed $191,194, or the maximum amount allowed, is approved by this Council to be used for the operation of the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, and such proposed special levy shall be certified as a tax levy to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before September 17, 2012. The final special levy shall be certified to the County Auditor of Hennepin County by December 20, 2012. Adopted by the City Council this 11 day of September, 2012. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • 2114 MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION J U LY 17, 2012 ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Kelvin Retterath, and Councilmember Ray Salazar. Absent: Pete Wiechert. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Planning Commission Secretary Jill Norlander, Planning Consultant Rita Trapp from HKGi. Others present: Brent Hislop (applicant — 5938 Idlewood Rd), Marty Campion (applicant's consultant for 5938 Idlewood Rd), Cecilia Glenn (applicant - 4354 Wilshire Boulevard) and Ryan Muonio (contractor for 4354 Wilshire Boulevard). APPROVE AGENDA WITH ANY AMENDMENTS MOTION by Salazar, second by Bergquist, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MAY 14, 2012 MEETING MINUTES • MOTION by Linkert, seconded by Ward, to approve the May 14, 2012 minutes as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Case No. 12-15 VARIANCE — LAKESIDE DECK Location: 4354 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD Owner: CECILIA GLENN Smith introduced the variance request. The applicant proposes to construct a lakeside deck on the north side of the home. The proposed deck would be located 25.26 feet at the closest point from the 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark. Required setback is 50 feet. Cecelia Glenn (applicant) thanked the Commission for their time and consideration. Salazar asked why the deck was designed with the landing rather than squaring off the deck on the east side. The applicant indicated they were attempting to minimize the variance. Retterath asked staff if there is code to prevent expanding this to a screen porch in the future. Smith responded that currently the property is over the hardcover minimum and putting a roof adds hardcover. Due to site conditions, City review and permitting would be required. There • are also alternate principal structure setbacks. 2115 Bergquist inquired about the neighborhood opinion of the project. Smith said the neighbors were notified by mail but no comments or questions were received. • MOTION by Salazar, second by Goode, to recommend City Council approve the variance as recommended by staff. MOTION carried unanimously. Case No. 12 -16 SKETCH PLAN — MAJOR SUBDIVISION Location: 5938 IDLEWOOD ROAD Applicant: BRENT HISLOP Trapp introduced the sketch plan for 5938 Idlewood Road. The applicant proposes to subdivide the 1.87 acre site into four lots. Access to the property is currently provided by a driveway off of Idlewood Road. The applicant is proposing that Lots 2, 3 and 4 will be accessed from Idlewood. Lot 1 is proposed to be accessed via a roadway to be constructed extending west from Fairfield. The roadway would be located in the existing, unimproved Fairfield Road right - of -way. The City is concerned with making sure that everyone is aware that this right of way area is public and carrying that fact forward to future property owners. Parkland dedication will be required. Runoff and stormwater issues will be required to be consistent with current policy. The use of the public road right of way (Fairfield Road) to be used as an access roadway for lot 1 will be specifically addressed during the preliminary and final plat stages in the development process. Brent Hislop (Synergy Land Company) pointed out that the existing right of way width of 24 feet • is not a normal width in today's standards. Marty Campion (Campion Engineering) added that, if the access right of way is improved, it will be at the expense of the property owner, not the City. Salazar suggested that the buyer of the large parcel be encouraged to buy the other remnant pieces. Linkert questioned the park dedication fee vs. land. He thought a land dedication could be used to straighten out the roadway. He also suggested that access to the landlocked property could be improved as well. Trapp clarified that park dedication is required to be used for park purposes. Because Fairfield Park is so close, the monetary contribution was an obvious choice. Linkert also inquired about using part of the large parcel as park dedication and adding to the adjacent wetlands. Staff replied that the wetlands will have to be delineated. Any development will trigger watershed review and buffers of appropriate size. Campion thought that wetlands may impact only the fringe corners of the property. Salazar was pleased to see the larger lot size of this project. • 2116 Retterath expressed concern that the construction of the access roadway for lot 1 would • significantly affect the front yard of 5921 Fairfield Road. He suggested the applicant consider a concept where a road is brought in from the south off Idlewood Road. This would result in the 3 lots along Idlewood being reduced in size and the ability to vacate the right of way north of the subdivision. Staff clarified that, after preliminary review, if the north /south right of way were vacated, all of that vacated area would go to the properties on the east because of the way it was originally platted. Trapp summarized some of the options for the applicant, i.e. processing this as a Planned Development Area (PDA) rather than variance and major subdivision process; it might be cleaner. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) could also be incorporated to enable periodic review of the project details. Campion asked if the Commission was generally in favor of the plan for using the right of way for an access roadway. Ward got a sense from the Commission that there was some favorability. Unique situations, such as this one, provide an opportunity to be accommodating. Linkert suggested that the plat include an option for dividing the larger parcel into two so that the applicant would have options in case the buyer backs out. Ward suggested that the ramifications of the proposed concept on the 5921 Fairfield Road property could be further explored at the City Council meeting. It was noted that while it may is be preferred that a roadway not be constructed, the right of way was historically platted with the intention of providing access to this undeveloped area. There are public resources available which would show this situation to property owners. Retterath requested confirmation that both Staff and the applicant were in agreement that while the access roadway will be built by the applicant it will be made available to adjacent parcels when they are developed. Both Staff and Campion confirmed that was the intent of the applicant. Retterath also asked about the installation of utilities after the drive is built. Campion said the undeveloped parcels can take the sanitary sewer straight south and east of that parcel is the watermain and hydrant. They would have to extend both the sewer and water services. The discussion with Public Works has not occurred at this point. OLD / NEW BUSINESS A. Council Liaison Update Walgreens applications were approved and project is moving forward Volksmarch was held July 13 with much success. Ray expressed his thanks to the volunteers and mentioned that July 21, 2013 is tentative date for the next event 0 2117 B. Staff Update. • November meeting date is election day; alternate meeting date will be discussed at • upcoming meeting. • Spirit of the Lakes /Centennial activities are taking place this week; all are invited to attend. • Planning Commission terms will be discussed at upcoming meeting. C. Next Meeting Date. Regular scheduled monthly meeting for August is August 7, 2012. MOTION by Ward, second by Salazar, to move the next meeting date to August 21, 2012. MOTION carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Ward, second by Penner, to adjourn at 9:04 pm. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander • • 2118