The URL can be used to link to this page

2012-10-23 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. • AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, OCT 23, 2012 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS * Consent Agenda Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. * Consent A eg nda *A. Approve payment of claims 2316 -2344 *B. Approve minutes: Oct 9, 2012 regular meeting 2345 -2346 • *C. Approve Resolution Authorizing Application to the Metropolitan 2347 -2348 Council for a grant from the Municipal I/I Grant Program for the City of Mound's 2013 Sewer Lining Project *D. Approve Labor Agreement between the City of Mound and Law 2349 -2375 Enforcement Labor Service, Inc, Local No 266 (Police Officer/ Investigator/Detective /Juvenile Officer) *E. Approve Resolution to Approve Changes to the Mound Fire 2376 -2392 Department Relief Association Pension Plan *F. Approve Resolution Approving a Variance for the Property at 2928 2393 -2415 Tuxedo Boulevard and Rescinding Resolution No. 01 -078 and Resolution No. 12 -67 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker) 6. Public Hearing(s) A. Continuance: Action on Resolution Adopting Assessment for 2416 Miscellaneous Expenses and Certifying to the County Auditor at 6% Interest — Levy #18263 C7 • PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 7. Planning Commission Recommendation(s) A. Public Hearing — PC Case No. 12 -16 Prelim Plat -Major Subdivision 2417 -2475 (Anderson Grove at Idlewood) PC Case No. 12 -18 - Variance PC Case No. 12 -19 - Final Plat 5938 Idlewood Road Brent Hislop, Synergy Land Company LLC (owner's representative)\ B. Consideration of variance and final plat applications C. Requested Actions 1. Action on Resolution granting approval of a variance for the 2420 -2422 Anderson Grove at Idlewood subdivision 2. Action on Resolution granting approval of prelim plat/major 2423 -2425 subdivision of Anderson Grove at Idlewood subdivision 3. Action on Resolution granting approval of final plat/major 2426 -2428 subdivision of Anderson Grove at Idlewood subdivision Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: C. Reports: Finance Dept: Sept 2012 2476 -2478 Investments: Sept 2012 2479 -2480 BMI Engineering: through Sept 2012 2481 Q Correspondence: 9. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: • www. cio�ofinound.com . COUNCIL BRIEFING October 23, 2012 * UycominE Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Oct 22 – 7:00 -8:30 – Mound Magic: An Update on Mound Community Development (Al & Alma's) Oct 23– 6:30 – HRA regular meeting Oct 23 – 7:00 – CC regular meeting Nov 1 – 7:00 -8:30 – Drug awareness meeting – Heroin: In Our Community (Gillespie Center) Nov 2 – Seasonal Hours end Nov 4 - Daylight Saving Time ends Nov 6 – Election Day Nov 13 – 6:30 – HRA regular meeting Nov 13 – 7:00 – CC regular meeting Nov 15 – 6:00 – Tree Lighting Ceremony Nov 19 – 7:30 – Mound Magic II —An Update on Mound Community Development Nov 27 – 6:30 – HRA regular meeting Nov 27 – 7:00 – CC regular meeting Dec 11 – 6:30 – HRA regular meeting Dec 11 – 7:00 – CC regular meeting City Hall Closings Nov 12 Nov 22 -23 Dec 24 W Dec 25 Veteran's Day observed Thanksgiving Christmas Eve Christmas Day City Official's Absences Jan 7 -15 Kandis Hanson Vacation Feb 14 -Mar 3 Kandis Hanson Vacation Of Particular Note You are encouraged to attend and observe the Parks & Open Space Commission interview on Nov 8. There are two vacancies to fill. One of the best ways to get really good volunteers is to invite people to get involved. You may direct potential candidates to Jill Norlander (jillnorlandergcityofmound.com or Jim Fackler (jimfacklergcityofmound.com with their questions or to attain an application. We have a Nov 1 deadline for applications. Inquire in advance, please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision - making. You may email the relative department head and copy the City Manager to expedite the answers to your questions. • City of Mound Claims as of 10 -23 -12 0 YEAR BATCH NAME 2012 1010CITYMAN $ 896,746.86 2012 1017CITYMAN $ 6 2012 102312CITY $ 245,772.16 I 2012 2012 102312HWS $ 115,601.09 BOLTMENK8 -9 $ 85,048.75 2012 KENGRAV0812 TOTAL CLAIMS 1 $ 1,353,081.65 DOLLAR AMOUNT $ 3,586.55 0 -2316- S: \FINANCE DEPT\AP \CITY COUNCIL CLAIMS LISTING CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 1010CITYMAN Payments MOUND,MN Payments 10/10/12 3:58 PM Page 1 Current Period: October 2012 User Dollar Amt $896,746.86 Computer Dollar Amt $896,746.86 Refer 1 AMERICAN LEGION POST #398 $0.00 In Balance Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -431 Meeting Expense CGM LUNCH MTG 10 -11 -12 J. COLOTTI $8.00 Invoice 10102012 10/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/10/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8.00 Refer 5 CASH, PETTY CASH _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -431 Meeting Expense CGM LUNCH MEETING 8 -9 -12 K. HANSON $9.00 Invoice 10102012 8/9/2012 JULY 2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -431 Meeting Expense CGM LUNCH MEETING 8 -9 -12 S. SMITH $9.00 Invoice 10102012 8/9/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51.63 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -431 Meeting Expense CGM LUNCH MEETING 8 -9 -12 J. COLOTTI $9.00 Invoice 10102012 8/9/2012 PAY REQUEST #5 WORK THRU SEPT 25, $25,419.82 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -431 Meeting Expense CGM LUNCH MEETING 4 -30 -12 J. COLOTTI $15.00 Invoice 10102012 4/30/2012 Project PW1203 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -322 Postage PD ADDTL POSTAGE $0.31 Invoice 10102012 5/7/2012 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW12 -04 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -430 Miscellaneous RETIREMENT CARD J. MCKINLEY- $3.96 Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -500 Capital Outlay FA WALGREENS $831,375.48 Invoice 10102012 5/17/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival TABLESKIRTS SOL WELLNESS WEEKEND $5.36 JULY 2012 Invoice 10102012 7/12/2012 Transaction Date 10/10/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51.63 Refer 3 GMH ASPHALT Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #5 WORK THRU SEPT 25, $25,419.82 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW12 -03 Invoice 10102012 10/3/2012 Project PW1203 Cash Payment E 401 -43110 -500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #5 WORK THRU SEPT 25, $39,281.93 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW12 -04 Invoice 10102012 10/3/2012 Project PW1204 Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #5 WORK THRU SEPT 25, $831,375.48 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW12 -01 Invoice 10102012 10/3/2012 Project PW1201 Transaction Date 10/10/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $896,077.23 Refer 2 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -434 Conference & Training APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION EXAM $110.00 CLASS - R. HANSON & M. MORRIS Invoice 10102012 10/10/2012 PO 24027 Transaction Date 10/10/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $110.00 Refer 4 PEARSON BROTHERS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 427 -43121 -300 Professional Srvs 2012 SEAL COAT PROJECT PIN 12 -06 PAY $500.00 REQUEST #2 SECOND STREET SWEEPING Invoice 2874 10/2/2012 Project PW1206 Transaction Date 4„ 10/10/2012 �. , ... .. Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.00 0 • • -2317- • ...� CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MN Payments 10/10/12 3:58 PM Page 2 Current Period: October 2012 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 427 SEAL COAT FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $27.63 $870,657.41 $500.00 $25,529.82 $32.00 $896,746.86 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $896,746.86 Total $896,746.86 • • -2318- MOUND, MN 10/17/12 11 ag M Payments L ........... _ ........ — -- CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Batch Name 1017CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $6,326.24 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $6,326.24 $0.00 In Balance Refer 2 AUTUMN RIDGE HOMES _ Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow REFUND NEW CONSTRUCTION ESCROW $5,000.00 DEPOSIT -4626 BEDFORD RD BP 2011 -00591 Invoice 10172012 10/17/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23007 Erosion Control Escrow REFUND EROSION CONTROL ESCROW $1,000.00 DEPOSIT -4626 BEDFORD RD BP 2011 -00499 Invoice 10172012 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,000.00 Refer 1 MOUND POST OFFICE _ Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -322 Postage OCTOBER 2012 UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $163.12 Invoice 10172012 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -322 Postage OCTOBER 2012 UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $163.12 Invoice 10172012 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $326.24 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $6,000.00 601 WATER FUND $163.12 602 SEWER FUND $163.12 $6,326.24 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,326.24 Total $6,326.24 • *I 01 -2319- \� • DtTY OF MOUND MOUND, MN Payments Current Period: October 2012 10/18/12 9:17 AM Page 1 Batch Name 102312CITY User Dollar Amt $245,772.16 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $245,772. $0.00 In Balance Refer 7 ALLIED WASTE _ Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -440 Other Contractual Servic SEPTEMBER CITYWIDE RECYCLING SVC $12,991.77 Invoice 0894- 002983252 10/15/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,991.77 Refer 8 ALLIED WASTE _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa OCT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PUB SAFETY - $99.59 FIRE • Invoice 0894 - 002986454 9/25/2012 Cash Payment E 10142110 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa OCT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PUB SAFETY - POLICE Invoice 0894- 002986454 9/25/2012 Cash Payment E 60249450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa OCT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PUB WORKS Invoice 0894- 002986456 9/25/2012 Cash Payment E 10145200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa OCT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE PARKS Invoice 0894- 002984225 9/25/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa OCT2012 GARBAGE SERVICE CITY HALL Invoice 0894- 002983647 9/25/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.59 $99.26 $149.89 $103.57 $551.90 Refer ,.g 55 APPROVED EQUAL COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 10142110402 Building Maintenance RESET & REPROGRAM HEATING SYSTEM $75.50 LIMIT PROTECTORS AT PD- SEARGENTS OFFICE Invoice 11259 10/15/2012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260401 Building Repairs RESET & REPROGRAM HEATING SYSTEM $75.50 LIMIT PROTECTORS AT PD- SEARGENTS OFFICE Invoice 11259 10/15/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.00 Refer KK 6ASPEN EMBROIDERY AND DESIG Cash Payment E 10141500 -218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDER CITY OF MOUNDWEAR $7.48 GARMENTS C ROBERTS Invoice 10232012 9/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDER CITY OF MOUNDWEAR $7.48 GARMENTS J. NORLANDER Invoice 10232012 9/28/2012 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDER CITY OF MOUNDWEAR $7.48 GARMENTS J.NELSON Invoice 10232012 9/28/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies EMBROIDER MOUND FIRE DEPT ON $70.50 WINDHSIRTS Invoice 10232012 8/20/2012 Cash Payment E22242260-210 Operating Supplies EMBROIDER MOUND FIRE DEPT SHIRTS -V. $14.96 WEBER 10232012 10/11/2012 • Invoice Transact Date 10/12/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107.90 .-. Refer 4 ASPEN EQUIPMENT _ -2320- 1 ..._.. - -- CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MN Payments Current Period: October 2012 10/18/12 9:17 AM Page 2 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL VIBRATOR PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS Invoice 10104784 9/12/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 $1,161.93 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,161.93 Refer Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow REFUND DEPOT DEPOSIT FEE P. $50.00 ASPINWALL Invoice 10232012 10/16/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 23 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL NEW DOOR SWITCH FOR $752.78 WELLHOUSE #8' NEW UPS AT STAND PIPE SUB MASTER, CHECK LOSS OF POWER AT WATERBURY LS Invoice 25753 10/8/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $752.78 Refer 5 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPP _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply OSRA BT28MOG MH LAMPS -PARKS $80.10 Invoice 904680489 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10117/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.10 Refer 56 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREN T Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 1 CONNECTOR &4 UNITS FOR 3 MONTHS $630.00 3RD QTR 2012 Invoice 00000098312 9/30/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.00 Refer 57 CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies ERASER WHEEL W/ ATT $83.10 Invoice 6974- 190088 9/8/2012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair OIL FILTERS -RED & 15W40 FLEET OIL $68.78 Invoice 6974 - 190141 9/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.88 Refer 62 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/149 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts COM & TRACTOR BATTERY #102 NEW $123.10 HOLLAND SKIDSTEER Invoice 6974 - 189837 9/5/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 189868 9/5/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 190222 9/11/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974 - 190279 9/12/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 190612 9/17/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 190613 9/17/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 190639 9/18/2012 26 ASPINWALL, PAM Project 12 -3 TRACTOR BATTERY CORE RETURN #102 - $20.31 NEW HOLLAND SKIDSTEER Project 12 -3 DEVON GENERATOR PERMATEX $28.01 THREADLOCKER LECTRA MOTIVE CLEANER $14.92 RELAY ACCESSORY STIGA'S $23.58 GLOSS TRIM BLACK #192 $18.49 EXT DOOR HANDLE '08 CHEV TRUCK #308 $31.24 -2321- • • Tran saction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $33.90 • Refer 12 CITY HEIGHTS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH ALL WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT $574.99 INCLUDING SKYLIGHTS CITY HALL Invoice 7616 10/1/2012 -2322- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 9:17 AM Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts STEEL D -RING SEWER QUICK TACH JETTER $29.05 Invoice 6974 - 190728 9/19/2012 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts STEEL D -RING SEWER QUICK TACH JETTER $29.05 Invoice 6974 - 190887 9/21/2012 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts STEEL D -RING SEWER QUICK TACH JETTER $29.05 Invoice 6974 - 191006 9/24/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts WIPER BLADE ICON '08 CHEV TRUCK #308 $32.90 Invoice 6974- 191188 9/26/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts TRANS FILTER KIT' 08 CHEV & OIL SEALS $40.99 #308 Invoice 6974 - 190779 9/19/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $380.07 Refer 50 CAULKINS GRAPHICS _ Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow MOUND FIRE LOGO CLOCKS TO BE PAID- $1,202.00 REIMBURSED BY FIREMEN Invoice 10232012 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,202.00 Refer 9 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SERVICE 8 -20 THRU 9 -20 -2012 $67.40 Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Payment E 101 -41910 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SERVICE 8 -20 THRU 9 -20 -2012 $52.14 • Cash Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SERVICE 8 -20 THRU 9 -20 -2012 $61.41 Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SERVICE 8 -20 THRU 9 -20 -2012 $22.18 Invoice 10232012 10/912012 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SERVICE 8 -20 THRU 9 -20 -2012 $61.43 Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SERVICE 8 -20 THRU 9 -20 -2012 $61.43 Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SERVICE 8 -20 THRU 9 -20 -2012 DEPOT $29.90 BLDG Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $355.89 Refer 10 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities LS B1 GENERATOR NATURAL GAS SVC 9 -23- $230.76 11 THRU 9 -20 -12 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD Invoice 10232012 10/4/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.76 Refer 11 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL $17.23 Invoice 00075530 8/31/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL $16.67 Invoice 00077163 9/30/2012 Project 12 -3 Tran saction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $33.90 • Refer 12 CITY HEIGHTS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH ALL WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT $574.99 INCLUDING SKYLIGHTS CITY HALL Invoice 7616 10/1/2012 -2322- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 9:17 e 4 AM Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -402 Building Maintenance WASH ALL WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT PUBLIC $322.77 SAFETY BLDG Invoice 7615 10/1/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance WASH ALL WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT PUBLIC $322.76 SAFETY BLDG Invoice 7615 10/1/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,220.52 Refer 13 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -224 Street Maint Materials 42A WEAR HOT ASPHALT MIX DURA DRIVE $169.72 3.09 TONS 9 -18 DELIVERY Invoice 32371 9/18/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -224 Street Maint Materials 42A WEAR HOT ASPHALT MIX DURA DRIVE $273.53 3.09 TONS 9 -05 DELIVERY Invoice 31584 9/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $443.25 Refer 14 ELECTRIC PUMP Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIRS E3 LIFT STATION $2,045.79 Invoice 0048087 9/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,045.79 Refer 15 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENTAN Cash Payment E 101 41310440 Other Contractual Servic ACTUATOR LEAF BLEEDER 4 "STROKE #304 $348.41 Invoice 10034 9/14/2012 • Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $348.41 Refer 17 EULLS MANUFACTURING CO., INC _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply MANHOLE RINGS & MORTAR MIX $191.25 Invoice 008265 9/13/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10 1 0 0 Total $191.25 Refer 14 FAMOUS DAVES BBQ _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -431 Meeting Expense SPIRIT OF THE LAKES BOARD LUNCHEON $191.15 11 -01 -12 Invoice 10232012 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $191.15 Refer � 16 FIVE TECHNOLOGY Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic TAX ON MONTHLY SVC 10 -12 -12 $61.11 Invoice 70501 10/2/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.11 Refer — 20�G & K SERVICES�� Cash Payment E 60949750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 9 -10 -12 LIQUOR STORE $58.58 Invoice 1006122105 9/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 10 -08 -12 LIQUOR STORE $58.58 Invoice 1006166347 10/8/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 10 -15 -12 LIQUOR $81.53 STORE Invoice 1006177506 10/15/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 10 -15 -12 CITY HALL $196.89 • Invoice 1006177510 10/15/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 101 Total $395.58 Refer 24 G & K SERVICES _ -2323- MOUND, MN Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -15 -12 PARKS Invoice 1006177511 10/15/2012 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 10 -15 -12 PARKS Invoice 1006177511 10/15/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -8 -12 PARKS Invoice 1006166353 10/15/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 10 -8 -12 PARKS Invoice 1006166353 10/15/2012 Transactio Date 10/16/2012 Wel F argo 10100 Total 10/18/12 9:17 AM Page 5 $45.48 $70.38 $40.76 $61.63 $218.25 Refer 25 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -10 -12 PUB WKS $24.40 Invoice 1006122111 9/10/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -10 -12 PUB WKS $25.27 Invoice 1006122111 9/10/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -10 -12 PUB WKS $35.52 Invoice 1006122111 9/10/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 9 -10 -12 PUB $373.52 WKS Invoice 1006122111 9/10/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -17 -12 PUB WKS $24.40 1006133267 9/17/2012 • Invoice Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -17 -12 PUB WKS $25.27 Invoice 1006133267 9/17/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -17 -12 PUB WKS $35.52 Invoice 1006133267 9/17/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials SHOP SUPPLIES 9 -17 -12 PUB WKS $149.52 Invoice 1006133267 9/17/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -24 -12 PUB WKS $33.85 Invoice 1006144280 9/24/2012 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -24 -12 PUB WKS $25.27 Invoice 1006144280 9/24/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 9 -24 -12 PUB WKS $35.52 Invoice 1006144280 9/24/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 9 -24 -12 PUB $112.74 WKS Invoice 1006144280 9/24/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -1 -12 PUB WKS $24.40 Invoice 1006155296 10/1/2012 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -1 -12 PUB WKS $25.27 Invoice 1006155296 10/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -1 -12 PUB WKS $35.52 Invoice 1006155296 10/1/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 10 -1 -12 PUB $221.55 WKS Invoice 1006155296 10/1/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,207.54 • Refer 18 GMH ASPHALT _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -525 Other Capital Improveme PARKING LOT PAVING PARKS DEPT LOT $18,000.00 Invoice 2028 10/8/2012 -2324- _ MOUND, MN 10/18/129:17 AM / \\ Payments Page 6 CETY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18,000.00 Refer 22 HACH COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -227 Chemicals WATER TESTING SUPPLIES $152.67 Invoice 7961203 9/26/2012 PO 25026 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $152.67 Refer 21 HANSON, KANDIS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -434 Conference & Training REIMB K. HANSON, MEALS ICMA -CITY MGR $63.87 CONFERENCE OCT 5 -11 PHOENIX AZ Invoice 10232012 10/15/2012 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -434 Conference & Training REIMB K. HANSON, TRANSPORTATION $45.00 ICMA -CITY MGR CONFERENCE OCT 5 -11 PHOENIX AZ Invoice 10232012 10/15/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 W Fargo 10100 Total $108.87 Refer 19 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR TAILGATE $185.00 Invoice 94940 9/28/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR TAILGATE & TRAILER $255.00 Invoice 94940 9/28/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $440.00 Refer 27 �HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO • Cash Payment E 60249450 -418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE & ADMIN FEE AUGUST 2012 $133.20 PUBLIC WORKS Invoice 120838112 8/30/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE & ADMIN FEE JULY 2012 $133.20 PUBLIC WORKS Invoice 120738113 7/31/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE & ADMIN FEE SEPT 2012 $133.20 PUBLIC WORKS Invoice 120938112 9/30/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 22242260 -418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE & ADMIN FEE SEPT 2012 FIRE $506.60 DEPT Invoice 120938033 9/30/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $906.20 Refer 28 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFFS A Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -450 Board of Prisoners SEPT 2012 PER DIEM & PROCESSING FEE $938.95 Invoice 1000020926 9/30/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $938.95 Refer 3 HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYERS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42400438 Licenses and Taxes RE- CONFIRM VARIANCE -FEES S. HUDAK $48.00 2928 TUXEDO PC #12 -21 Invoice 849730 10/1/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $48.00 Refer 30 INFRATECH Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -220 Repair/Maint Supply TRAX JR ASSEMBLY DOUBLE RIVET ALL $687.07 • Invoice 1200503 9/5/2012 FEET -2325- MOUND, MN 10/18/129:17 AM Page 7 Payments 1.... __ .... ---- ..r.... CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -224 Street Maint Materials WHITE MARKING PAINT, & FLOURESCENT $307.80 BLUE & GREEN PAINT Invoice 1200555 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $994.87 Refer 32 ISLAND PARK SKELLY _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SQUAD #845 CHANGE FILTER, TOP OFF OIL, $65.15 MOUNT & BALANCE 2 TIRES, ROTATED FRONT TO REAR Invoice 33402 9/19/2012 Cash Payment E 10 1 -42110 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SQUAD #842 REPLACE ALTERNATOR & $743.48 BATTERY Invoice 33465 10/9/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $808.63 Refer 31 (STATE TRUCK CENTER _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts PRESSURE SWITCH & PARTS FOR #304 $45.06 TYMCO Invoice C242226052 9/24/2012 Tr Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.06 Refer 29 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -350 Printing CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER 10 PG, JULY, $1,710.00 AUG SEPT 2012 EDITION, PRINT, FOLD,MAIL • Invoice 33735 7/31/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,710.00 Refer 33 LAKE RESTORATION, INC. _ Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -440 Other Contractual Servic BEACH WOOD POND TREATMENT $553.00 WATERMEAL, DUCKWEED, SUBMERGED WEEDS & ALGAE Invoice 95766 8/29/2012 Transaction Date 10/1612012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $553.00 Refer 34 LAKESHORE WEEKLY COMMUN/C Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing 3 X 3" MOUND MAGIC MTG AD 10 -9 -12 $108.00 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Invoice Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.00 Refer 35� LANO EQUIPMENT, INCORPORAT Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair TUBE PARTS -PARKS $44.27 Invoice 55704 10/9/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $44.27 Refer 36 _ LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials FUSES, SWIVEL CRIMPS, GLOSS BLACK $140.96 MTCE PAINT, POLY -TITE MALE CONNECTOR Invoice 93301149432 10/2/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials FLAT FACE HYDRO COUPLERS $102.84 Invoice 93301124730 9/21/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $243.80 • Refer 37 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA C652 MAIL ROOM COPIER $26.36 COLOR COPIES OVERAGE 9 -14 THRU 10 -13 Invoice 1468071 10/8/2012 -2326- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 9:17 AM Page 8 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 IiiiiiiiiiiiC Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA C652 MAIL ROOM COPIER $111.44 B & W COPIES OVERAGE 9 -14 THRU 10 -13 Invoice 1468071 10/8/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER $15.85 B & WHT COPIES OVERAGE 9 -10 THRU 10 -9 Invoice 1468070 10/8/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER $15.86 B & WHT COPIES OVERAGE 9 -10 THRU 10 -9 Invoice 1468070 10/8/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $169.51 Refer 38 LUBE TECH, INCORPORATED _ .r. -W... Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials WINDSHIELD WASH, ANTIFREEZE $869.99 Invoice 2100498 9/7/2012 Project 12 -3 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $869.99 Refer 58 MAU, DEAN _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -308 Building Inspection Fees REVIEW & ASSESS FIRE SPRINKLER $30.00 SYSTEM, REPORT FOR BALBOA BUSINESS CENTER Invoice 10232012 9/27/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 39 MERTZ, CRAIG M. LAW OFFICE • Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -304 Legal Fees CITY PROSECUTION SVCS SEPTEMBER $5,532.17 2012 Invoice 0000450 10/2/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,532.17 Refer 40 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES NOVEMBER 2012 $62,357.48 Invoice 0001000391 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $62,357.48 Refer 41 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEM Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -200 Office Supplies LETTER LATERAL FILE FOLDERS 3 CASES- $289.30 PD Invoice 723221 9/28/2012 PO 24125 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $289.30 Refer 42 MINNEAPOLIS GLASS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -401 Building Repairs REPLACE 4 FOGGED INSULATED GLASS $2,352.96 WINDOW UNITS AT CITY HALL Invoice 208720 10/5/2012 PO 22795 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,352.96 ., .. I'.__ _ _ .. _ "I'll -111, 1 - _ —" Refer 43 MINNESOTA LABOR INDUSTRY Cash Payment E285-46388-210 Operating Supplies ANNUAL ELEVATOR OPERATION PERMIT $100.00 PARKING DECK Invoice ALR00228861 9/25/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Refer 44 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA W _� Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples COLIFORM WATER TESTS & MONTHLY $77.50 • CHLORINE REPORT Invoice 627259 10/15/2012 -2327- • L MOUND, MN 10/18/12 9:17 AM � Page 9 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.50 Refer 45 MNSPECT _ Cash Payment R 101 -42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee SEPTEMBER 2012 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE - $329.60 CREDITS Invoice 5892 3/20/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments SEPTEMBER 2012 ELECTRICAL SURCHAGE - $85.00 FEE CREDITS Invoice 5892 3/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees SEPTEMBER 2012 BUILDING INSPECTION $13,017.04 FEES Invoice 5892 3120/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,602.44 Refer 44 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib OCTOBER 2012 FIRE RELIEF CONTRIBUTION $11,968.75 Invoice 10232012 10/16/2012 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib 2012 FIRE STATE AID $73,686.21 Invoice 10232012 9/28/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85,654.96 Refer 45 MOUND TIF INVESTMENT PARTNE _ Cash Payment E 355 -46384 -650 TIF Payments to Develo EXCESS TIF FROM METROPLAINS DISTRICT $9,500.00 Invoice 10232012 10/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,500.00 Refer 3 MOUND, CITY OF _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -382 Water Utilities WATER SERVICE 9 -6 -12 THRU 10 -1 -12 HWS $42.56 Invoice 10232012 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.56 Refer 46 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAI _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic REWIND STATOR MOTOR, REPLACE $1,138.98 BEARINGS, SEALS AND O- RINGS, INSTALL PUMP & TEST RUN WELL Invoice 5961 9/7/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,138.98 Refer L 47 NEOPOST Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -400 Repairs & Maintenance 10 -03 -12 THRU 10 -02 -13 POSTAGE METER & $1,089.33 SCALE STANDARD MTCE PLAN Invoice 49128678 10/3/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,089.33 Refer 5 OFFICE DEPOT _ FILE FOLDERS Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 628247012001 10/10/2012 PO 24030 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 628247012001 10/10/2012 PO 24030 Cash Payment E 101 -41410 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 628247012001 10/10/2012 PO 24030 • Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 628247012001 10/10/2012 PO 24030 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 628247012001 10/10/2012 PO 24030 STAPLER -K. HANSON THERMAL ROLLS - ELECTIONS INK CARTRIDGES PUBLIC WORKS Project 12 -3 POCKET FILES LEGAL SIZE -2328- $11.07 $12.07 $8.30 $21.43 $28.74 MOUND, MN 10/18/12 9:17 AM Page 10 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $81.61 Refer 1 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 10141910 -210 Operating Supplies CITY HALL HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $141.52 RENTALS (2) AUG THRU OCT 2012 Invoice 604558 -09 -30 9/30/2012 Transaction Date 10/10/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $141.52 Refer 48 RAYS SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -533 Tree Removal TREEWORK AT 4997 TUXEDO CUT $695.00 HACKBERRY OVER POWER LINES & RD Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 10145200 -533 Tree Removal TREEWORK AT LOSTLAKE PARK CUT & $1,400.00 HAUL 7 WILLOWS Invoice 10232012 10/9/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,095.00 Refer 49 ROBERTS, COLLETTE _ Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -331 Use of personal auto REIMB C. ROBERTS MILEAGE TO GOVT $24.42 PAYROLL SEMINAR 104-12 Invoice 10232012 10/11/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.42 Refer 50 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -409 Other Equipment Repair 8" VAC HOSE -PARKS $175.45 • Invoice P00574 10/9/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $175.45 Refer 51 SHADOWPLASTICS, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa 32 X 50 BLACK POLY LINER GARBAGE $952.00 BAGS FOR PARKS Invoice 73096 7/26/2012 PO 22792 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Farg 10100 Total $952.00 Refer 52 STAR -WEST CHEVROLET /OLDS _ 1 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts SEAL FOR TRUCK #308 $19.78 Invoice 134617 9/20/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19.78 Refer � 53 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING AD 9 -29 -12 $229.98 Invoice 1126855 9/29/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23259 5938 Idlewood LEGAL NOTICE PUB 10 -13 -12 5938 $38.59 IDLEWOOD SUBDIVISION PROJECT Invoice 1130858 10/13/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23259 5938 Idlewood LEGAL NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING 10 -6 -12 $38.59 5938 IDLEWOOD SUBDIVISION PROJECT Invoice 1129741 10/6/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $307.16 Refer 60 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies SOS WOOL SOAP PADS, GRILL CLEANER- $23.47 STEAK FRY DINNER Invoice 098098 9/22/2012 . Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies 25ML PLAS WELDER $6.40 Invoice 098098097541 9/5/2012 -2329- MOUND, MN —� Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 10/18/12 9:17 AM Page 11 $29.87 Refer 54 TRUE VALUE MOUND (POLICE) _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -210 Operating Supplies TRASH BAGS, OFF -SET ANGLE, HALOGEN $42.70 HI -LO BEAM Invoice 097619 9/7/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies SCREWS, NUTS BOLTS $11.48 Invoice 097853 9/14/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies FLT ALW BAR $3.73 Invoice 097859 9/14/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies SCREWS, NUTS BOLTS, SOCKET $12.87 Invoice 097925 9/17/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies WIPER BLADES $12.80 Invoice 098183 9/26/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies LIQUID CAR WASH $8.5 Invoice 098197 9/26/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23215 Emerg Respond Unit Lake Ar DBL LOCKING PADLOCK, 2 PK SS PADLOCK $50.21 LAKE MTKA ERU Invoice 098041 9/20/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -210 Operating Supplies CREDIT OPERATING SUPPLIES -$3.00 Invoice 097619 9/7/2012 Transaction Date 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $139.33 Refer 2 'TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts MAGNETIC T -BAR DRIVER, CHAIN LUBE, $29.35 FOLD UP KEY SET, PIPE PLUG #195 Invoice 097755 9/11/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -210 Operating Supplies 3 LB QUICK GRASS SEED $6.40 Invoice 097788 9/12/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts CLOTH #195 $3.52 Invoice 097825 9/13/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -221 Equipment Parts VINYL PROTECTANT $20.30 Invoice 097831 9/13/2012 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS #195 $1.30 Invoice 097833 9/13/2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -322 Postage WELL #8 FED EX SHIPPING CHARGE $17.25 Invoice 097863 9/14/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -210 Operating Supplies 2 SUPER BROOMS $49.14 Invoice 097864 9/14/2012 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -210 Operating Supplies 8 PK AA ALK BATTERIES $8.00 Invoice 097921 9/17/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials GALVANIZED COUPLING $9.59 Invoice 098065 9/21/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials CONNECTOR, PLUMBING & HEATING $2.76 Invoice 098067 9/21/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $2.55 Invoice 098080 9/21/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies MESH PAINT STRAINER $3.73 • Invoice 098222 9/27/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials SIMPLE GREEN CLEANER $19.00 Invoice 098253 9/28/2012 Project 12 -3 -2330- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 9: age 2 Payments / • GtTY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -322 Postage CREDIT SHIPPING CHARGE RETURN -$9.99 Invoice 098323 9/30/2012 $236.50 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -210 Operating Supplies PR $24.39 Invoice 098470 10/5/2012 $1,172.74 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SANITARY TEE $5.96 Invoice 098479 10/5/2012 $1,172.74 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies 6 FLOOD LIGHTS, TRASH BAGS, NATRL $43.25 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells FRONTIER BILL AUDIT- FEE % OF SAVINGS CLEANER Invoice 098480 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/10/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $236.50 Refer 7 USA BLUEBOOK _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply PARA 20# BLOCK DEODORANT CHERRY $1,172.74 Invoice 777555 9/25/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,172.74 Refer 8 UTILITIES REDUCTION SPECIALIS _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells FRONTIER BILL AUDIT- FEE % OF SAVINGS $1,967.46 Invoice 2400 -1 6/19/2012 Project 12 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells FRONTIER BILL AUDIT- FEE % OF SAVINGS $533.88 Invoice 2400 -1 6/19/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,501.34 Refer 9 VERIZON WIRELESS • Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATALUX COMPUTER BROADBAND SVC $52.04 OCT 8 THRU NOV 7 FIRE DEPT Invoice 2811404478 10/7/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.04 Refer 10 WATER CONSERVATION SERVIC Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE WEEKEND- 9 -16 -12 @2620 $415.80 COMMERCE BLVD Invoice 3427 10/1/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $415.80 Refer � 59 WEBER, VICKI Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies V. WEBER 2012 MOUNDWEAR APPAREL $47.60 REIMBURSEMENT Invoice 10232012 10/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.60 Refer � . 11 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE AND� Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -221 Equipment Parts MOUNT SKIDSTEER TIRE ON SEWER DEPT $60.00 BOBCAT Invoice 689582 9/27/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.00 Refer 12 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN AT COMMERCE & $2,778.75 BARTLETT 9 -16 -12 Invoice 3296 10/1/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,778.75 • Refer 13 XCEL ENERGY -2331- _ MOUND, MN 10/18/12 9:17 AM --.,� Page 13 Payments • .. •.... CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 C� Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities STREET LIGHTS ELECTRIC SERVICE 9 -3 -12 $2,477.02 TO 10 -2 -12 Invoice 441625368 10/3/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,477.02 Fund Summary Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $245,772.16 Total $245,772.16 -2332- 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $55,200.42 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $88,319.70 285 MOUND HRA $100.00 355 2003 -C G.O. TIF 1 -2 $9,500.00 601 WATER FUND $4,699.82 602 SEWER FUND $74,100.77 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $306.68 670 RECYCLING FUND $12,991.77 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $ 553.00 $245,772.16 Fund Summary Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $245,772.16 Total $245,772.16 -2332- MOUND, MN 10/18/1211:29 AM $256.00 Page 1 Payments •...• LIQUOR CITY OF MOUND Invoice 75398600 10/8/2012 Current Period: October 2012 Batch Name 102312HWS User Dollar Amt $115,601.09 LIQUOR Payments Computer Dollar Amt $115,601.09 Invoice 75387500 10/5/2012 $0.00 In Balance Refer 2 AMUNDSON, M. LLP _ LIQUOR Cash Payment E 60949750 -256 Tobacco Products For R TOBACCO PRODUCTS $550.60 Invoice 140401 10/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $550.60 Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ Invoice 75387500 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $93.88 Invoice 460228502 10/11/2012 FREIGHT Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 460228502 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $121.32 Invoice 461227905 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 461227905 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $217.20 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS, POPS, REGISTER ROLLS $118.10 Invoice 87451200 10/12/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $76.01 Invoice 87425000 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SHELF STRIPS $66.10 Invoice 87425000 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $260.21 R efer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $256.00 Invoice 75398700 10/8/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,799.53 Invoice 75398600 10/8/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $852.60 Invoice 75387500 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $220.50 Invoice 75487600 10/12/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.75 Invoice 75387500 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $7.65 Invoice 75487600 10/12/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,149.03 Refer 4 1 BELLBOY CORPORATION • • Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $54.00 Invoice 87472400 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $58.00 Invoice 87472400 10/17/2012 • Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCH FOR SALE $59.70 Invoice 87472400 10/17/2012 -2333- MOUND, MN 10/18/1211:29 AM Page 2 \� Payments • ,• CfTY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, REGISTER ROLLS $50.50 Invoice 87451201 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,022.49 Invoice 75529900 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $58.90 Invoice 75529900 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $176.00 Invoice 75529800 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.55 Invoice 75529800 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10118/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,481.14 Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $30.27 Invoice 22583 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $149.55 Invoice 22584 10/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 W ells Fargo 10100 Total $179.82 Refer 6 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COKE PRODUCTS- MIX $313.52 Invoke 10/11/2012 • Transaction Date 1 Lion Da a Wells Fargo 10100 „ Total $313.52 Refer 7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $433.00 Invoice 1041262 10/8/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $433.00 Refer 8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $22.40 Invoice 671941 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $271.00 Invoice 671206 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R SHAKER MUGS, GLASSES $36.00 Invoice 671600 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,196.80 Invoice 671942 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$0.80 Invoice 670995 10/2/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,525.40 Refer 40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,197.25 Invoice 672866 10/16/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $66.30 Invoice 672865 10/16/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 W ells Fargo 10100 Total $2,263.55 -*5"M 9 EXTREME BEVERAGE _ • Refer Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $60.50 Invoice W625450 10/3/2012 -2334- -2335- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 11:29 AM Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $43.00 Invoice W633391 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Welts Fargo 10100 Total $103.50 Refer 10 GLACIAL RIDGE, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $712.20 Invoice 10232012 10/2/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $712.20 Refer 11 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $436.00 Invoice 144481 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $6.75 Invoice 144481 10/3/2012 Tr Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $442.75 Refer 12 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $804.00 Invoice 619706 10/10/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $804.00 Refer � 13 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $78.00 Invoice 1894342 10/2/2012 • Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $38.00 Invoice 011922 9/28/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,148.66 Invoice 1894339 10/2/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,188.66 Refer u 14 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $195.30 Invoice 1931429 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $52.75 Invoice 1931422 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,549.27 Invoice 1931421 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $86.40 Invoice 1931449 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $77.60 Invoice 1866549 8/28/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,953.10 Invoice 1931464 10/16/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $28.00 Invoice 011928 10/12/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,886.42 Refer 15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ uu Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,495.80 Invoice 1408695 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $6,142.10 • Invoice 1408696 10110/2012 -2335- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 11:29 AM Page 4 Payments • CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $340.00 Invoice 550231 9/28/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT '$44.10 Invoice 551105 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,253.80 Refer 16 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $94.75 Invoice 1403524 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,655.59 Invoice 1403520 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,962.70 Invoice 1403521 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $20.99 Invoice 1403522 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,458.79 Invoice 1403523 10/3/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,192.82 Refer 38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,558.25 • Invoice 1414068 Cash Payment 10/17/2012 Wi E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,936.25 Invoice 1414069 10/17/2012 $20.99 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1414070 10/17/2012 Transact Da te 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,515.49 Refer 17 LAKESHORE WEEKLY COMMUNIC _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising ADVERTISING 4 COLOR 4 X 10" AD $720.00 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Invoice 00130530 10/2/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 - Total $720.00 Refer 18 LITURGICAL PUBLICATIONS, INC. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising ADVERTISING ST. JOHN'S LUTHERAN $316.00 NEWSLETTER MOUND- 11 -1 -12 THRU 10 -15- 13 Invoice 0003 10/8/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $316.00 Refer 19 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVCS 9 -20 -12 $273.55 Invoice 27383 9/20/2012 $37.80 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVCS 9 -24 -12 Invoice 27392 9/24/2012 Cash Payment E 609-49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVCS 9 -27 -12 $327.55 Invoice 27408 9/27/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVCS 10 -1 -12 $40.60 27416 10/1/2012 • Invoice Cash Payment E 609-49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVCS 10-4 -12 $277.90 Invoice 27434 10/4/2012 -2336- Invoice 2311666 10/3/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 W ells Fargo 10100 Total $1,881.70 Refer 25 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $680.60 • Invoice 2315373 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,796.57 Invoice 2315372 10/10/2012 -2337- MOUND, MN 10118/12 11:29 AM '^ Page 5 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVCS 10 -8 -12 $53.20 Invoice 27444 10/8/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVCS 10 -11 -12 $515.80 Invoice 27463 10/11/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,526.40 Refer 20 MINNESOTA PUBLISHING _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising 1/2 PAGE AD OCT 2012 WEST LAKE $243.00 BUSINESS PUBLICATION Invoice 14655 10/1/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $243.00 Refer 21 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -412 Building Rentals NOVEMBER COMMON AREA MTCE & $1,024.25 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 10232012 10/16/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 W ells Fargo 10100 Total $1,024.25 Refer 22 PARLEY LAKE WINERY _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $522.00 Invoice 8306 10/12/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $522.00 Refer 23 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,425.30 • Invoice 8369772 10/8/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $30.00 Invoice 8369772 10/8/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $742.81 Invoice 8370914 10/15/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.75 Invoice 8370914 10/15/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,206.86 Refer 24 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,045.57 Invoice 2311662 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $522.55 Invoice 2311661 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $56.98 Invoice 2311663 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $107.00 Invoice 2311665 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $116.65 Invoice 2311664 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $32.95 Invoice 2311666 10/3/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 W ells Fargo 10100 Total $1,881.70 Refer 25 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $680.60 • Invoice 2315373 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,796.57 Invoice 2315372 10/10/2012 -2337- _ MOUND, MN ...� Payments f ...�. CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2315374 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2319134 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2319135 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 10/18/1211:29 AM Page 6 $33.95 $146.00 $697.62 Total $4,354.74 Refer 26 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,968.00 Invoice 1922619 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,703.38 Invoice 1924110 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $632.00 Invoice 1929416 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $40.12 Invoice 1924112 10/11/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,343.50 Refer 27 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $352.00 1894935 10/4/2012 • Invoice Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $81.60 Invoice 1924030 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,989.33 Invoice 1897323 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $109.00 Invoice 1898574 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $523.35 Invoice 1924076 10/5/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,837.28 Refer 37 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $489.87 Invoice 1924150 10/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $852.00 Invoice 1929439 10/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $272.00 Invoice 1922645 10/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,280.00 Invoice 1922640 10/18/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,893.87 Refer 28 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $119.00 Invoice 716295 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $148.20 Invoice 716395 10/5/2012 Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $134.70 • Cash Invoice 716396 10/5/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $56.00 Invoice 00774295 10/12/2012 -2338- _ MOUND, MN 10/18/1211:29 AM \� Payments Page 7 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $457.90 Refer 29 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ $1,324.00 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $187.60 Invoice 716724 10/9/2012 FREIGHT $26.40 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,375.95 Invoice 716725 10/9/2012 WINE $716.67 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,368.53 Invoice 717966 10/16/2012 FREIGHT $13.20 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $103.85 Invoice 717885 10/16/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,080.27 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,035.93 Refer 30 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $92.25 Invoice 0064254 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $25.50 Invoice 0064254 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $99.75 Invoice 0064254 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $976.00 Invoice 0064254 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $327.25 Invoice 0064875 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $284.00 Invoice 0064875 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 0064875 10/11/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,817.25 Refer 31 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,324.00 Invoice 311055 10/4/2012 Invoice 426001 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $26.40 Invoice 311055 10/4/2012 Invoice 426997 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $716.67 Invoice 311798 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $13.20 Invoice 311798 10/11/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,080.27 Refer 32 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 426000 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 426001 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 426070 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 426997 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 426998 10/10/2012 -2339- $624.00 $23.13 $435.00 • • $4,908.00 • $36.75 MOUND, MN 10/18/1211:29 AM -- - -.�„\ Page 8 Payments C ITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $583.10 Invoice 428040 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Ress MIX $8.13 Invoice 428041 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,618.11 Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,133.75 Invoice 966806 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.50 Invoice 963721 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609-49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.00 Invoice 966808 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $288.00 Invoice 966810 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,788.40 Invoice 963720 10/3/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $31.00 Invoice 966809 10/10/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,572.15 Invoice 969918 10/17/2012 • Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $50.00 Invoice 969919 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,927.80 Refer 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $47.95 Invoice 115556 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,741.11 Invoice 115554 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,660.79 Invoice 115555 10/4/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $44.46 Invoice 113449 9/28/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,494.31 Refer WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT R.. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,370.93 Invoice 118991 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,739.33 Invoice 118990 10/11/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $64.00 Invoice 870070 10/9/2012 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,185.99 Invoice 122481 10/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $186.00 Invoice 122480 10/18/2012 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,239.56 • Invoice 122482 10/18/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,657.81 Refer 36 Z WINES USA LLC - -2340- CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MN Payments Current Period: October 2012 10/18/12 11:29 AM Page 9 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,148.00 Invoice 11463 10/17/2012 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $21.00 Invoice 11463 10/17/2012 Transaction Date 10/17/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,169.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $115,601.09 $115,601.09 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $115 ,601.09 Total $115,601.09 • • C7 -2341- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 8:56 AM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Batch Name BOLTMENK8 -9 User Dollar Amt $85,048.75 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $85,048. $0.00 In Balance Refer 61 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs I & I ANALYSIS; 2011 CIPP PROJECT SVCS $3,132.50 THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151155 9/30/2012 Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU SEPT 14 $284.00 2012 Invoice 0151168 9/30/2012 Cash Payment E 401 - 43101 -300 Professional Srvs 2011 SW ISLAND STREET PROJ PW11 -01 $2,840.00 ENGINEER SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151169 9/30/2012 Project PW1101 Cash Payment E 401 -43127 -300 Professional Srvs 2011 HIGHLANDS STREET PROJ PW11 -02 $2,272.00 ENGINEER SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151170 9/30/2012 Project PW1102 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU SEPT $2,012.00 142012 Invoice 0151171 9/30/2012 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT $71.00 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151172 9/30/2012 Cash Payment • E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2011 LIFT STATIONS PROJECT PW 11- $1,670.00 03ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151173 9/30/2012 Project PW1103 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2012 IVD WINDSOR RD WATERMAIN LOOP $71.00 PROJECT PW 12 -07 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151174 9/30/2012 Project PW1207 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2011 STORM DRAIN IMPROV PROJ. PW11 -05 $71.00 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151175 9/30/2012 Project PW1105 Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs 2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROJ. PW 12- $65,643.00 01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151176 9/30/2012 Project PW1201 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2012 STORM DRAIN IMPROV. PROJ PW 12- $612.50 05 ENGINEERING SVCSTHRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151177 9/30/2012 Project PW1205 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2012 LIFT STATION PROJECTS PW12 -03 $1,818.75 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151178 9/30/2012 Project PW1203 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT $780.00 142012 Invoice 0151154 9/30/2012 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs STORM SEWER GEN ENGINEERING SVCS $97.50 THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151154 9/30/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23247 WALGREENS #11 -10 SEMP WALGREENS SITE REVISION PLAN REVIEW $71.00 & MTG ENGINEER SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 0151156 9/30/2012 • Invoice Cash Payment G 101 -23259 5938 Idlewood 5938 IDLEWOOD- ANDERSON GROVE $198.50 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151156 9/30/2012 -2342- MOUND, MN 10/18/12 8:56 AM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Cash Payment E 427 -43121 -300 Professional Srvs 2012 CRACK & SEAL COAT PROJ PW 12 -06 $709.00 ENG SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151179 9/30/2012 Project PW1206 Cash Payment E 401 - 43113 -303 Engineering Fees 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- $2,695.00 01 ENG SVCS THRU SEPT 14 2012 Invoice 0151180 9/30/2012 Project PW1301 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85,048.75 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,049.50 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $73,450.00 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT $284.00 427 SEAL COAT FUND $709.00 601 WATER FUND $71.00 602 SEWER FUND $6,692.25 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $2,793.00 $85,048.75 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $85,048.75 Total $85,048.75 • • -2343- MOUND, MN 10/18/1211:46 AM /,,..•- --.._ --\ Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2012 Batch Name KENGRAV0812 User Dollar Amt $3,586.55 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,586.5 $0.00 In Balance Refer 63 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -304 Legal Fees EXECUTIVE LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2012 $372.50 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -304 Legal Fees ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SERVICES AUG $241.20 2012 i s • Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -314 Legal P/W PUBLIC WORKS LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2012 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -312 Legal Police PARKS LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2012 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23247 WALGREENS #11 -10 SEMP WALGREENS - SEMPER ZONING' SUBDIVISION APPS LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2012 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23260 4606 CARLOW RD. EXPAN 4606 CARLOW EXPANSION PERMIT APP LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2012 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment G 101 -23211 T- Mobile Upgrade Well #8 To T- MOBILE SITE CHANGES LEGAL SVCS AUG 2012 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -316 Legal P & I Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -304 Legal Fees PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2012 VERIZON SITE CHANGES LEGAL SVCS AUG 2012 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 NUISANCE ABATEMENT 5910 RIDGEWOOD LEGAL SERVICES THRU AUG 2012 $234.30 $624.00 $158.55 $36.00 $210.00 $564.00 $210.00 $132.00 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -300 Professional Srvs FIRE EXPANSION AGREEMENT -ST. BONI $804.00 LEGAL SERVICES AUG 2012 Invoice 10232012 8/31/2012 Transaction Date 10/18/2012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,586.55 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,782.55 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $804.00 $3,586.55 Fund Summary Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,586.55 Total $3,586.55 -2344- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 9, 2012 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on • Tuesday, October 9, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Councilmembers Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, and David Osmek. Members absent: Councilmember Heidi Gesch Others present: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, Acting City Manager Catherine Pausche, Susan Chambers, Tyler Jordahl, Travis Pounder, Mike Catten, Richard Strand, Rene LaFortune, Dan Wold Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve aaenda It was requested to add Item 4(I), Parking Plan Extension from New Morning Church. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to approve the agenda as amended All voted in favor. • Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to approve the consent agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $299,820.61 B. Approve minutes of the September 25, 2012 regular meeting C. Approve Final Payment to Pearson Bros., Inc., in the amount of $500.00 for the 2012 Seal Coat Project D. Approve Pay Request #5 from GMH Asphalt Corporation, in the amount of $896,077.23 for work completed on the 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement Project; City Project Nos. PW- 12 -01, 12 -03, and 12 -04. . E. Approve quote from Dock & Lift in the amount of $29,400.00 for Devon Commons shoreline repair, with expenses to be charged to the dock Fund 45210 -525 F. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -82: RESOLUTION ADOPTING 2012 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST — LEVY #18262 G. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -83: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTINUANCE OF THE LANGDON AREA CENTRAL BUSINESS PARKING PROGRAM FOR 2012 -2013 H. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -84: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1909 SHOREWOOD LANE • -2345- Mound City Council Minutes — October 9, 2012 I. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -85: RESOLUTION APPROVING EXTENSION OF PARKING PLAN FOR TEMPORARY USE OF PROPERTY AT 2529 COMMERCE BOULEVARD BY NEW MORNING • CHURCH 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agend None were offered. 6. Public hearing Assessment hearing for miscellaneous expenses — mowing. Mayor Hanus opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. It was noted that a letter of objection was received from the property owner of 4539 Island View Drive. Susan Chambers, 4840 Bedford, appeared before the council protesting the amount of the proposed assessment against her property. She stated she agrees that she should pay something, but it should be about half of what she is being charged, which is over $100. The Council took her comments into consideration and did not change her proposed assessment. After no further comment, Mayor Hanus closed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Osmek to continue the public hearing until October 23, 2012, due to a legal publication error by the official newspaper. Motion carried. 7. 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project Dan Faulker stated that 2013 will be the final year of the 10 -year street project in neighborhoods. He reviewed the proposed construction area as well as the engineer's estimate for the proposed • assessment, which is $5,986 per residential unit. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Salazar to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 12 -86: RESOLUTION RECEIVING FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON THE 2013 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — SE ISLAND AREA 8. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /report from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Planning Commission of September 4, 2012 C. Reports: Website Statistics: October 1, 2012 Finance Dept. —August, 2012 Harbor Wine & Spirits — September, 2012 Take -Home Vehicle Compliance WeCAB D. Correspondence: None 9. Adjourn MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie to adjourn at 7:37 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Mark Hanus • Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2346- 8c> \_..TON a M E= N K ConsuMng Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 - Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bofon- menk.com October 17, 2012 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Metropolitan Council Grant Program Infiltration and Inflow Reduction Dear Mayor and Council Members: I N4'0 During its past session, the Minnesota Legislature appropriated to the Metropolitan Council $4,000,000 for a grant program for the purpose of providing grants to eligible municipalities for capital improvements to public municipal wastewater collection systems to reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration going to the Metropolitan Council Environment Services (MCES) sanitary sewer disposal system. This year's program is nearly identical to the Metropolitan Council's program in 2010. The eligible cities consist of the 50 metropolitan communities that were previously identified by MCES as having "excessive" 1/1. Mound is one these identified cities. The grant covers 50 percent of "eligible" construction costs up to a maximum of $50,000, although there is an opportunity to receive additional grant funding if the total amount of approved requests is less than the $4 million appropriated. The City has been very aggresive in its efforts to reduce its I/1 over the past few years and this grant program will help the City do even more. Participation in the 2010 grant program resulted in the City receiving a grant in the amount of $31,375. The grant application requires a significant amount of detailed information, including project cost information. We have worked with City staff to identify sewer lines that are in need of lining. We have calculated a preliminary project cost estimate of $350,000 for completing a Cured -In -Place Pipe (CIPP) project in 2013. A project of this extent would allow the City to request the maximum grant amount of $50,000 from the Metropolitan Council. In order to apply for the Municipal I/I Grant Program, a grant application must be submitted by October 26, 2012, and include a certified resolution authorizing the grant application. A City Resolution has been prepared and is enclosed for your consideration. Sincerely, B LTON ,& MEN INC. � � Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer HAM01JW 12105673\ ( Cor uQ Docs\ 2012 -10-17 Ltr to Co Rc Grant Application.doc DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer • • • -2347- • CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FOR A GRANT FROM THE MUNICIPAL INFILTRATION /INFLOW GRANT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF MOUND'S 2013 SEWER LINING PROJECT WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has appropriated $4,000,000 for a grant program to be administered by the Metropolitan Council (Council) for the purpose of providing grants to municipalities for capital improvements to public municipal wastewater collection systems to reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system (1 /1 Municipal Grant Program); and WHEREAS, the Council has identified the City of Mound as a contributor of excessive inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system and thus an eligible applicant for grant funds under the 1/1 Municipal Grant Program; and WHEREAS, grants from this appropriation are for up to 50 percent of the cost to mitigate 1/1 in the publicly owned municipal wastewater collection system; and WHEREAS, only construction costs will be eligible for reimbursement, as specified in the Grant Program, and include such improvements as manhole rehabilitation and sealing, sewer pipe lining if supportive information is provided that demonstrates system susceptibility to . 1/1; and • WHEREAS, qualified spending on approved projects can occur between May 12, 2012 and June 30, 2014; and WHEREAS, each submitting community, out of a total of 50 eligible cities, if approved would receive the lesser of $50,000 or 50% of the submitted eligible project costs; and WHEREAS, the City's Capital Improvement Program includes $200,000 in 2012 and 2013 for a sewer pipe lining project at an estimated project cost of $350,000 on public sewer lines; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that city staff is hereby authorized to prepare and submit a Grant Application to the Metropolitan Council for inclusion in the Municipal Infiltration /Inflow Grant Program prior to the submittal deadline of October 26, 2012. Adopted by the City Council this 23` day of October, 2012. Mayor Mark Hanus • Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2348- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD IF OF MOUND MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM October 15, 2012 To: City Mayor and City Council From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Treasurer Re: Action to approve Labor Agreement between the City of Mound and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. (LELS) Local No. 266 Police Officer /Investigator/Detective /Juvenile Officer for 2011— 2012 The 2011 — 2012 contract with the police officers union was settled in arbitration that took place . on July 27, 2012. A summary of Arbitrator Richard John Miller's opinion is as follows: • New Article — Shift Differential — Not awarded • Article XXX1 — Employee Salary Increases —1% as of 7/1/11, 1% as of 1/1/12 • Article XXXI — Employee Salary "Me Too Language" — Awarded • Article 18 — Insurance — No change to current language awarded • Article 18 — Insurance — include language on PEHCSP — request withdrawn by union prior to hearing In addition to these changes, a Memorandum of Understanding was created to ensure the union would receive 100% of accrued vacation and comp time as of 12/31/12 paid out as severance as a result of the contract for police services with the City of Orono. The Council is asked to take action to approve the Labor Agreement between the City of Mound and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. (LELS) Local No. 266. The contract was approved and signed by the union representatives on October 8, 2012. Please let us know if you have any questions. • -2349- ® printed on recycled paper • LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. (LOCAL NO. 266) POLICE OFFICER INVESTIGATOR/DETECTIVE JUVENILE OFFICER • EF'FECT'IVE JANUARY 1, 2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2012 • -2350- TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT ...................................... ..............................1 ARTICLEII RECOGNITION ............................................................ ..............................1 ARTICLEIII DEFINITIONS ............................................................... ..............................1 ARTICLE IV EMPLOYER SECURITY ............................................. ..............................3 ARTICLE V EMPLOYER AUTHORITY .......................................... ..............................3 ARTICLE VI UNION SECURITY ...................................................... ..............................3 ARTICLE VII EMPLOYEE RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE.. ........ ......................4 ARTICLE VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE ...................................................... ..............................6 ARTICLEIX SENIORITY .................................................................. ..............................6 ARTICLEX DISCIPLINE .................................................................. ..............................7 ARTICLE XI CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION ........................... ..............................8 ARTICLE XII WORK SCHEDULE ..................................................... ..............................8 ARTICLE XIII OVERTIME .................... ............................................... ..............................8 ARTICLEXIV COURT TIME ............................................................... ..............................9 ARTICLEXV CALL BACK TIME ...................................................... ..............................9 ARTICLE XVI WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION ................... ..............................9 ARTICLEXVII SAFETY ........................................................................ ..............................9 ARTICLEXVIII INSURANCE................. ................................................ ..............................9 ARTICLEXIX HOLIDAYS ................................................................... .............................10 ARTICLE XX VACATION SCHEDULE................... ......................... .............................11 ARTICLE XXI SICK LEAVE AND FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT (FMLA) ........11 i *I • • -2351- � 0 ARTICLE XXII SEVERANCE PAY ...................................................... .............................12 ARTICLE XXIII INJURY ON DUTY ...................................................... .............................12 ARTICLE XXIV FUNERAL LEAVE ...................................................... .............................13 ARTICLE JURY DUTY ................................................................ .............................13 ARTICLE XXVI EYE EXAMINATIONS ............................................... .............................13 ARTICLE XXVII STANDBY PAY ........................................................... .............................13 ARTICLE XXVIII EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVES ................................. .............................13 ARTICLE XXIX P.O.S.T. LICENSE FEE ............................................... .............................14 ARTICLE XXX UNIFORM ALLOWANCE .......................................... .............................14 ARTICLE WAGES ........................................................................ .............................14 ARTICLE XXXII WAIVER ....................................................................... .............................15 • ARTICLE XXXIII DURATION ............ ............................... .... ...................I........... .......15 MEMORANDUMOF AGREEMENT ............................................................. .............................17 MOUND PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM ................................................. .............................18 FITNESS STANDARDS .................................................................................. .............................20 • ii -2352- LABOR AGREEMENT • BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND 0 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES, INC. (LOCAL No. 266) ARTICLE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between the City of Mound, hereinafter called the Employer, and the Law Enforcement Labor Service, Inc., hereinafter called the Union. It is the intent and purpose of this Agreement to: 1.1 Establish certain hours, wages and other conditions of employment; 1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning the Agreement's interpretation and/or application; 1.3 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties; and 1.4 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment • for the duration of the Agreement. The Employer and the Union, through the Agreement, continue their dedication to the highest quality of public service. Both parties recognize this Agreement as a pledge of this dedication. ARTICLE II RECOGNITION 2.1 The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179A.03, subd. 8, for all Police personnel in the following job classifications: Police Officer Investigator/Detective Juvenile Officer 2.2 In the event the Employer and the Union are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services for determination. ARTICLE III DEFINITIONS 3.1 UNION: The Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. • 1 -2353- • 3.2 UNION MEMBER: A member of the Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. (Local No. 266). 3.3 EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 DEPARTMENT: The City of Mound Police Department. 3.5 EMPLOYER: The City of Mound, Minnesota 3.6 CHIEF: The Chief of the City of Mound Police Department. 3.7 CITY MANAGER: The City Manager of the City of Mound. 3.8 UNION OFFICER: Officer elected or appointed by the Law Enforcement labor Services, Inc. (Local No. 266.) 3.9 INVESTIGATOR/DETECTIVE: An employee specifically assigned or classified by the Employer to the job classification and/or position of Investigator/Detective. 3.10 OVERTIME: Work performed at the express authorization of the Employer in excess of the employee's scheduled shift. 0 3.11 SCHEDULED SHIFT: A consecutive work period including rest breaks and a lunch break. 3.12 REST BREAK: Periods during the scheduled shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.13 LUNCH BREAK: A period during the scheduled shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.14 STRIKE: Concerted action in failing to report for duty, the willful absence from one's position, the stoppage of work, slowdown, or abstinence in whole or in part from the full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment for the purpose of inducing, influencing or coercing a change in the conditions or compensation or the rights, privileges or obligations of employment. 3.15 PROBATIONARY PERIOD: A period of time not to exceed twelve (12) calendar months from the date of employment subject to the conditions of Article IX, Section 9.2. 3.16 SENIORITY: Length of continuous employment with the City of Mound, as a Police Officer. 3.17 COMPENSATORY TIME: Time off the employee's regularly scheduled work schedule, equal in time to overtime worked. U z . -2354- 3.18 SEVERANCE PAY: Payment made to an employee upon honorable termination of • employment. 3.19 WORK YEAR: Shall consist of 2080 hours and shall run from 12:01 am. January 1, through 12:00 midnight December 31. 3.20 CONTRACT YEAR: Same as work year. ARTICLE IV EMPLOYER SECURITY 4.1 The Union agrees that during the life of this Agreement that the Union will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow -down or other interruption of or interference with the normal functions of the Employer. ARTICLE V EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited to this Agreement. 5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this • Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the employer to modify, establish or eliminate. ARTICLE VI UNION SECURITY 6.1 In recognition of the Union as the exclusive representative, the Employer shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such deduction in writing, an amount sufficient to provide the payment of dues established by the Union, or a "fair share" deduction, as provided in Minnesota Statute 179A.06. subd. 3, if the employee elects not to become a member of the Union. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the Union. 6.2 The Union may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a steward and an alternate and shall inform the Employer in writing of such choice and changes in the position of steward and alternate. 6.3 The Employer shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting Union notice(s) and announcements. 6.4 The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgements brought or issued against the Employer as a result of any action taken or not taken by the Employer under the provisions of this Article. • 3 -2355- • ARTICLE VII EMPLOYEE RIGHTS GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 7.1 Definition of a Grievance. A grievance is a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7.2 Union Representatives. The Employer will recognize representatives designated by the Union as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The Union shall notify the employer, in writing, of the names of such Union representatives and of their successors when so designated. 7.3 Processing of a Grievance. It is recognized and accepted by the Union and the Employer that the processing of grievances, as hereinafter provided, are limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the employees and, therefore, shall be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved employee and the Union representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer during normal working hours, provided the employee and the Union representative have notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer. 7.4 Procedure. Grievances, as defined by Section 7.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: STEP 1. An employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall, within fourteen (14) working days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the employee's supervisor (the Patrol Sergeant), as designated by the Employer. The Patrol Sergeant will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated and the remedy requested and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Patrol Sergeant's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 2 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. STEP 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed with the Employer- designated Step 2 representative (the Police Chief). The Police Chief shall give the Union the Employer's Step 2 answer, in writing, within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the Police Chiefs final answer in Step 2. Any grievance not appealed, in writing, to Step 3 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. STEP 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and • discussed with the Employer- designated Step 3 representative (the City Manager). The 4 -2356- City Manager shall give the Union the Employer's answer in writing, within ten (10) • calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the City Manager's final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. STEP 3A. If the Employer and the Union mutually agree, a grievance unresolved in Step 3 may be submitted to the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services for mediation within ten (10) calendar days following the Step 3 Employer response. If the grievance is submitted to mediation and is not resolved, it may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the mediation meeting. Any grievance not appealed, in writing, to Step 4 within said ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. STEP 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 shall be submitted to arbitration, subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971 as amended. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Bureau of Mediation Services. 7.5 The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify nullify, ignore, add to or subtract from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer and the Union and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, • or modifying or varying in any way, the application of laws, rules or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following the close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the Employer and the Union and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement and to the facts of the grievance presented. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the Employer and the Union, provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. 7.6 Waiver. If the grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered waived. If a grievance is not appealed to the next Step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer's last answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or appeal thereof, within the specified time limit, the Union may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that Step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next Step. The time limit in each Step may be extended by mutual agreement of the Employer and the Union. • 5 -2357- • 7.7 Choice of Remedy. If, as a result of the written Employer response in Step 3, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to Step 4 of Article VII or a procedure such as: Veteran's Preference of Fair employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of Article VII, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure, as provided in Step 4 of Article VII. The aggrieved employee shall indicate, in writing, which procedure is to be utilized, Step 4 of Article VII or another appeal procedure and shall sign a statement to the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of Article VII. The election set forth above shall not apply to claims subject to the jurisdiction of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. ARTICLE VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota and the City of Mound. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provisions shall be voided. All other provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provisions may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. • ARTICLE IX SENIORITY 9.1 Seniority shall be determined by the employee's length of continuous employment with the Police Department. Seniority rosters may be maintained by the Chief on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classifications. 9.2 During the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired employee may be discharged at the sole discretion of the Employer. During the probationary period, a promoted or reassigned employee may be placed in his/her previous position at the sole discretion of the Employer. 9.3 A reduction in work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shall be recalled from layoff on the basis of seniority. An employee on layoff shall have the opportunity to return to work within two (2) years of the time of his/her layoff before any new employee is hired. 9.4 Senior employees will be given preference with regard to transfer, job classification assignments and promotions when the job relevant qualifications of employees are equal. 9.5 Layoff. In the event the City of Mound determines to reduce a position or positions, employees shall be laid off, with at least two (2) weeks' notice. 9.6 Recall. Employees shall be recalled in order of seniority for a position within the same classification held prior to layoff available for a qualified employee on layoff. The 6 -2358- Employer shall mail, by certified mail, the notice to such employee who shall have • fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of mailing of such notice to accept re- employment. If written acceptance is not received by the city Manager within such fourteen (14) calendar day period, it shall constitute a waiver on the part of such employee to any further rights of employment or reinstatement and shall forfeit any future reinstatement of employment rights. The employee must accept the first offer of hiring at the same classification from which the employee was laid off or the employee shall be removed from the recall list. The employee may refuse an offer for a lower classification from which the employee was laid off, however, once an employee is offered a lower classification position and refuses such offer, only higher classification positions need be offered. 9.7 Senior qualified employees shall be given shift assignment preference after eighteen (18) months of continuous full -time employment. 9.8 One continuous vacation period shall be selected on the basis of seniority until March 15 of each calendar year. ARTICLE X DISCIPLINE 10.1 The Employer will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in one or more of the following forms: A. Oral reprimand; • B. Written reprimand; C. Suspension D. Demotion; or E. Discharge 10.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written form. 10.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, and notices of discharge which are to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees and the Union will receive a copy of such reprimand and/or notices. 10.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the direct supervision of the Employer. At the request of the employee, all oral and written reprimands will be removed after 18 months provided there has been no similar disciplinary action taken against the employee during this period. The provision does not apply to discipline involving sexual harassment and discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age. • 7 -2359- • 10.5 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a Union representative present at such questioning. 10.6 Grievances relating to suspensions, demotions or discharges shall be initiated by the Union at Step 3 of the grievance procedure under Article VII. ARTICLE XI CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens by the United States and Minnesota State Constitutions. ARTICLE XII WORK SCHEDULE 12.1 The normal work year is two thousand and eighty (2,080) hours to be accounted for by each employee through: A. Hours worked on assigned shifts; B. Holidays; C. Assigned training D. Authorized leave time. • 12.2 Holidays and authorized leave time are to be calculated on the basis of the actual length of time of the assigned shifts. 12.3 Nothing contained in this or any other Article shall be interpreted to be a guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours the Employer may assign employees. ARTICLE XIII OVERTIME 13.1 Employees will be compensated at one and one -half (1 -1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate for hours worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled shift. Changes in shifts do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. 13.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable. 13.3 Overtime refused by employees will for record purposes under Article 13.2 be considered as unpaid overtime worked. 13.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded or paid twice for the same hours worked. 13.5 Overtime will be calculated to the nearest fifteen (15) minutes. 13.6 Employees have the obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested by the Employer unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from so working. 8 -2360- 13.7 Compensatory time may be taken, at the option of the employee as payment for overtime • worked, in lieu of money. 13.8 The following classification shall be granted up to 10 hours of compensatory time per month at the time and one -half rate in recognition of the extra hours requested by these assignments: A. Reserve Liaison Officer B. Range Officer; C. Canine Officer Above classifications must document their time spent performing these functions. Documentation procedure is to be established by Employer. ARTICLE XIV COURT TIME An employee who is required to appear in court during his/her scheduled off -duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one -half (1 -1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for court appearances does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour minimum. ARTICLE XV CALL BACK TIME An employee who is called to duty during his/her scheduled off -duty time shall receive a • minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one -half (1 -1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour minimum. ARTICLE XVI WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION Any employee assigned by the Employer to work at a higher job classification shall be paid at the higher rate of pay for the duration of the assignment. Upon completion of the assignment, the employee shall revert to his/her original or assigned pay rate. ARTICLE XVII SAFETY The Employer and the Union agree to jointly promote safe and healthful working conditions, to cooperate in safety matters and to form a Safety Committee to help advise the employer of any unsafe conditions that exist or need attention. Safety Committee will consist of Police Chief, Sergeant's Steward and Patrol Steward. ARTICLE XVIII INSURANCE 18.1 The Employer agrees to pay the full premium for the employee only hospitalization /major medical insurance for each full -time employee from the first of the month following thirty (30) days of continuous employment. The Employer agrees to contribute up to $925 per month in 2011 and 2012 toward the cost of family coverage or • 9 -2361- • dependent coverage plus one (1) from the first of the month following thirty (30) days of continuous employment for each full -time employee who elects coverage under this Agreement. Any additional costs for such family coverage shall be paid by the employee through payroll deduction. In no event shall the employer's contribution exceed the actual cost of the coverage selected by the employee. 11 18.2 The Employer agrees to pay the full premium for a long -term disability policy for each full -time employee, from the first of the month following thirty (30) days of continuous employment. The qualifying period of the LTD shall be 90 days. Employees shall not earn more while on LTD than they would receive as a base pay if they were in a work status. 18.3 The Employer agrees to pay the full premium for dental insurance coverage for each full - time employee who elects Employee only coverage from the first of the month following thirty (30) days of continuous employment. The Employer agrees to contribute up to the equivalent of the employee -cost per month for family coverage from the first of the month following thirty (30) days of continuous employment for each full-time employee who elects family coverage. 18.4 Employees shall be eligible for the existing Health Care Savings Plan set forth in the City Administrative Code effective upon ratification of this Agreement. Effective January 1, 2006, the City's amended Health Care Savings Plan will apply to employees covered under this contract. 18.5 A short-term disability insurance policy will be made available to employees on a voluntary basis from the first of the month following thirty (30) days of continuous employment. The premium will be paid by the employee through payroll deduction. The employee may choose their desired benefit amount, not to exceed 60% of gross pre -tax income. AR'T'ICLE XIX HOLIDAYS 19.1 The Employer agrees to provide the following paid holidays: New Year's Day Martin Luther King Day President's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Day The Day After Thanksgiving Christmas Eve's Day Christmas Day One (1) Floating Holiday 19.2 The above - listed holidays will be used the same as vacation. Any unused days as of December 1 St shall be paid on the first non -pay week as soon as possible after the 1St of December. Management reserves the right to maintain minimal schedules on holidays, and to schedule people off, as per current practice. 10 -2362- 19.3 Employees who work any of the above- listed holidays shall receive a cash payment of • two (2) times his/her regular base pay rate. 19.4 Employees working a schedule with weekends off shall observe holidays on the same date as observed by the other non -law enforcement employees. ARTICLE XX VACATION SCHEDULE 20.1 Employees shall accrue vacation according to the following schedule: YEARS HOURS EARNED NUMBER OF OF PER BI- WEEKLY DAYS PER SERVICE PAY PERIOD YEAR 0 -5 3.077 10 6 -10 4.616 15 11 -15 6.154 20 16 -20 7.693 25 21 -25 8.308 27 26+ 9.230 30 20.2 Paid vacations shall be earned during the fast year of employment, but cannot be taken until the end of the first year of employment without the approval of the Employer. 20.3 At the time of termination or retirement, the employee shall receive all accrued vacation and/or comp time in the form of a check. 20.4 No contributions to the Health Care Savings Plan are permitted by MSRS after the death of an employee. Therefore, any pay related to hours worked, accrued vacation and comp time, and the sick portion of severance pay calculated according to Section 21.1, Severance Pay, will be paid according to the payment method in effect during the last full pay period in which the employee was paid, which is in the form of a direct deposit to the financial institution(s) on record. 20.5 An Employee may carry over up to one and one -half (1 -1/2) times earned vacation from one calendar year to the next. Employees with more than 5 years of service as of December 31, 2011, will be grandfathered in at a limit of 480 hours (12 weeks) annual carryover. ARTICLE XXI SICK LEAVE AND FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT (FMLA) 21.1 Sick leave shall be accumulated at the rate of one (1) day per month. A. Sick leave shall not be considered as a privilege which an employee may use at his/her discretion, but shall be allowed in the case of personal illness, legal • 11 -2363- • quarantine, disability of the employee, disability related to childbirth, to receive dental or medical care or if there is serious illness in the immediate family and no other responsible adult is available to care for the ill family member. "Immediate family member" here is defined as employee's mother, father, siblings, spouse, children, step - children, grandchildren, grandparents, and spouse's mother, father, siblings, children, grandparents and grandchildren. B. An employee may use personal sick leave benefits accumulated in accordance with this Article for absences due to an illness of the employee's child for such reasonable periods as the employee's attendance with the child may be necessary, on the same terms the employee is able to use sick leave benefits for the employee's own illness. For the purposes of this paragraph, "child" is defined in accordance with Minnesota Statute 181.940, subd. 4 as an individual under 18 years of age or an individual under age 20 who is still attending secondary school, and shall include a step child, ward or adopted child under the ages specified herein. 21.2 The FMLA language stated in the Administrative Code will apply to employees covered under this contract. ARTICLE XXII SEVERANCE PAY 22.1 The following is the severance pay schedule, based on accumulated sick leave, which • shall become effective for all full -time employees upon reaching tenure of five (5) years (60 months). After 5 years of service 53% After 10 years of service 59% After 15 years of service 66% After 20 years of service 73% After 25 years of service 80% 22.2 Sick leave shall be paid to the Health Care Savings Plan in accordance with Section 14A of the Administrative Code. 22.3 An employee who is discharged from employment for just cause shall not be entitled to severance pay under this Article. ARTICLE XXIII INJURY ON DUTY 23.1 Upon employment, each employee shall immediately accumulate ninety (90) days of additional sick leave to be used only for injuries or illnesses incurred on the job. There shall be an initial waiting period of three (3) days per injury. After the initial waiting period, the employee will be paid the difference between the employee's regular base pay rate and the Workers' Compensation insurance payments for a period not to exceed ninety (90) working days per injury; not to be charged against employee's vacation or . sick leave accumulated in accordance with Articles XX and M. Upon return to work 12 -2364- from such injury on duty sick leave, the employee shall immediately accumulate up to • ninety (90) days of sick leave. Sick leave under this Section shall not apply to severance benefits. The Employer reserves the right to have the injured employee examined by a doctor of its choice to determine the employee's fitness for duty within his/her job classification and prior to returning to duty to determine if that employee is fit to perform all duties of his/her job classification. 23.2 Upon the receipt of a request for extension of injury on duty leave, by the injured employee, the City Manager may act to extend the injury on duty leave up to thirty (30) working days. The extension will be made only after the City Manger has the opportunity to consult with a city appointed doctor, who has had a chance to examine the injured employee and made a recommendation to the City Manager about the extent of the employee's injury. ARTICLE XXIV FUNERAL LEAVE 24.1 Funeral leave, for immediate family, not to exceed three (3) days per occurrence will be allowed by the City Manager. If more than three (3) days are required, the employee may choose to deduct the extra days over three (3) from either vacation leave or accumulated sick leave. "Immediate family" is defined as mother, father, siblings, spouse, children, grandparents and spouse's mother, father, siblings, children, grandparents and grandchildren. ARTICLE XXV JURY DUTY • 25.1 Any City employee who is required to serve on jury duty shall be granted an amount of compensation which will equal the difference between the employee's regular base pay rate and the compensation paid for jury duty. ARTICLE XXVI EYE EXANIINATIONS 26.1 The Employer agrees to pay up to fifty dollars ($50.00) in each twenty-four (24) month period of full-time employment toward an eye examination or the purchase of eyeglasses for each full -time employee. ARTICLE XXVII STANDBY PAY Any employee placed on standby duty by the employer on their regularly scheduled day off shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours of standby pay. Standby pay shall be one -half (1/2) hour pay for each one (1) hour required to standby for duty. ARTICLE XXVIII EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVES If funds are not provided by any other governmental agency, the Employer shall pay cost of tuition equal to that charged by state institutions after them employee has successfully completed a course with a grade of "C" or better. The course must be approved in advance by the city • 13 -2365- • Manager. Upon completion of the course, the employer will pay the employee a one (1) time payment of five dollars ($5.00) for each credit hour the employee earned. ARTICLE XXIX P.O.S.T. LICENSE FEE The Employer will pay the cost of the employee's Peace Officer License. ARTICLE XXX UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 30.1 Each employee shall be entitled to an annual uniform allowance of $800.00 in 2010, 2011 and 2012. The uniform allowance to be paid by separate check directly to the employee by February 1 of each year. 30.2 The Employer agrees to replace all clothing damaged in the line of duty at no cost to the employee. 30.3 The Employer shall pay for any uniforms purchases caused by mandated changes including patch and style changes or additional items. The Employer agrees to phase out uniform standards over a two -year period if a mandated change is made. ARTICLE XXXI WAGES 31.1 Wages • Patrol Rate 111 /11 7/1/11 1/1/12 Start $3,811.34 $3,849.45 $3,887.95 After 6 months $4,054.05 $4,094.59 $4,135.54 After 12 months $4,351.24 $4,394.75 $4,438.70 After 24 months $4,691.79 $4,738.71 $4,786.09 After 36 months $5,026.61 $5,076.88 $5,127.64 After 60 months $5,127.13 $5,178.40 $5,230.19 31.2 InvestigativeJDetective/Drug Task Force 0 -6 months $75.00 per month over base rate After 6 months $150.00 per month over base rate The Investigator/Detective/Drug Task Force differential shall be included as part of the employee's base pay rate for purposes of calculating overtime pay for overtime hours is work as an Investigator /Detective/Drug Task Force. 14 -2366- Employees assigned to Investigator/Detective/Drug Task Force division and who have • successfully completed twelve (12) months and are reassigned to patrol division shall continue to receive one - hundred ($100.00) per month. FTO: An employee assigned FTO duties shall receive 1 hour compensation at straight time for each shift doing FTO duties. 31.3 Incentive Program 1.5% addition on the base for living and owning within the City of Mound. 2% addition on the base for a four year degree. 1.5% addition on the base for achieving fitness standard of 19 pts. 2% addition on the base for problem - solving utilizing the SARA model and appropriate documentation. Project to receive prior approval by Chief. 31.4 If any City Employee receives a general wage increase (other than through reclassifications or promotions) greater than received by this group, the City shall increase the wage schedule by the same amount. ARTICLE XXXII WAIVER • 32.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations, regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement are hereby superseded 32.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted in this Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals, with respect to any terms or conditions of employment not removed by law, from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this Agreement for the stipulated duration of this Agreement. The Employer and the Union, each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate, regarding any and all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this Agreement or with respect to any terms or conditions of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this Agreement, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both the parties at the time this Agreement was negotiated or executed. ARTICLE XXXIII DURA'T'ION This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2011 and shall remain in full force and effect until December 31, 2012. 15 -2367- C • • �T SS WHE OF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the d7y of ^ QM' 2012, FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SE ES, INC. LOCAL NO. 266 O Mayor Business Agent ef�m City Manager Steward 16 -2368- MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT • This Memorandum. of Agreement is entered into between the City of Mound (hereafter "Employer") and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. Local No. #266 (hereafter "Union "). WHEREAS, the Employer and the Union are parties to a Labor Agreement covering employees in the positions of Police Officer, Investigator/Detective and Juvenile Officers; and WHEREAS, the Employer believes that a minimum level of physical fitness is important to the safety and health of each employee; and WHEREAS, the employer wishes to encourages employees to be physically fit. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Employer will implement a physical fitness program as set forth in Attachment A hereto. 2. Each employee may participate in the physical fitness program, at the employee's option. Participation in the physical fitness program in voluntary. 3. This Memorandum of Agreement shall be in effect from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012. IN WIT WHEREOF, the parti hereto have executed this Memorandum of Agreement • on this day of 2012. FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR !rES, INC. LOCAL NO. 266 0 Mayor City Manager • 17 -2369- �J MOUND PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM I. INTRODUCTION Following are the standards for the fitness program for the Mound Police Department. Officers who agree to participate in the program will be eligible to receive additional incentives as outlined within this program document. The standards used have been developed by Dr. Kenneth Cooper and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. It is mutually agreed that a minim level of physical fitness is important to the safety and health of each officer in adequately performing their duties. II. STANDARDS The areas to be measured to determine officer's physical fitness levels are: A. Aerobic Capacity B. Flexibility C. Dynamic Strength D. Absolute Strength E. Body Fat Composition A. AEROBIC CAPACITY The aerobic capacity test will consist of a mile and a half run for time or a • 12 minute Air- Dyne cycling test. Tables for proficiency will be used as outlined in The Aerobics Program for Total Well- being, by Dr. Kenneth Cooper, B. FLEXIBII.ITY Consists of a "stretch and reach" test measured in inches. C. DYNAMIC STRENGTH Sit -ups Bent -knee sit -ups with ankles secured and hands folded across the chest or flat along the floor. Push -ups Straight body push -up with no rest stops. D. ABSOLUTE STRENGTH Bench press Bench press utilizing the Universal Gym Leg press Leg press utilizing the Universal Gym E. BODY FAT COMPOSITION Using skin -fold calipers is 18 -2370- III. INCENTIVES • As an incentive for maintaining good physical fitness, police personnel will earn "fitness time" compensation. "Fitness time ": will be accrued separately from comp -time currently used within the department. "Fitness time" will be accrued separately from comp -time and must be used within the calendar year earned. Personnel testing will be administered twice annually for those who volunteer to take part in the program. Testing will be held in the months of April and October each year. "Fitness time" shall be earned as follows: 16 hours for those who score 30 points or more and have had 2 or less "sick leave episodes" within the last 6 months. 12 hours for those who score 22 points or more (no category less than 2) and have had 2 or less "sick leave episodes" within the last 6 months. 8 hours for those who score 16 points (no category less than 2) and have had 2 or less "sick leave episodes" within the last 6 months. 4 hours of those who score <16 points (no category less than 1) and have had 2 or less "sick leave episodes" in the last 6 months. Mound Police Fitness "logo" products. Individuals who become involved in the program will be provided with a Mound • logo T -shirt for their participation. Individuals who score within the above perimeters in both the April and October testing periods will be awarded reimbursement for athletic clothing and/or running shoes upon presentation of a receipt as follows: 30 points; $100 value per year 22 points; $65 value per year 16 points; $40 value per year IV. MEDICAL EXAMINATION Individuals who have not had a fitness assessment (within the last 2 years) will be required to be evaluated before any testing. Individuals who are over 35 years of age will be required to provide a doctor's authorization before participating. SICK LEAVE EPISODE - a period of time missed due to the Employee's single illness or injury, not sick leave taken for a family member or a doctor's appointment for preventative care of the employee. Single day sick equals 1 episode; continuous 3 day absence for same illness equals 1 episode. • 19 -2371- • • 1.5 MILE RUN TEST FITNESS STANDARDS Fitness Points Gender Minimum 20 -29 30 -39 1 M 71:00 F 20:00 3 M 19:00 F 20:00 5 M 12:30 F 14:30 6 M 16:30 F 19:00 12 MINUTE CYCLING TEST (in miles) 1 M 2.25 F 1.50 2 M 16:30 9:45 10:00 3 M 11:00 F 13:00 5 M 14:30 F FLEXIBILITY (sit and reach in inches) 1 M 13.3 F 16.8 2 M F 3 M F 5 M F 40 -49 50-59 14:00 14:45 15:35 17:00 18:30 19:00 19:30 20:00 12:00 12:30 13:00 14:30 15:54 16:30 17:30 19:00 10:45 11 :00 11:30 12:30 13:30 14:30 15:55 16:30 9:45 10:00 10:30 11:00 12:30 13:00 13:45 14:30 3.75 3.25 3.00 2.25 2.50 2.25 2.00 1.50 4.50 4.25 4.00 3.50 3.50 3.25 3.00 2.00 5.50 5.25 5.00 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.00 3.50 >5.50 >5.25 >5.00 >4.50 >4.50 >4.25 >4.00 >3.50 16.5 15.5 14.3 13.3 19.3 18.3 17.3 16.8 18.5 17.5 16.3 15.5 20.5 20.0 19.0 18.5 20.5 19.5 18.5 17.5 22.5 21.5 20.5 20.3 >20.5 >19.5 >18.5 >17.5 >22.5 >21.5 >20.5 >20.3 20 -2372- FITNESS STANDARDS Fitness Points Gender Minimum DYNAMIC STRENGTH (sit -ups push -ups) Sit -ups (one minute) 1 M 24 F 14 2 M F 3 M F 4 M F 5 M F 20 -29 30-39 40 -49 50 -59 <38 <35 <29 <24 <32 <25 <20 <14 <42 <39 <34 <28 <38 <29 <24 <20 <47 <43 <39. <35 <44 <35 <29 <24 <47 <43 <39 <35 <44 <35 <29 <24 >55 >52 >28 >25 >50 >43 >40 >35 Push -ups (no resting) 1 M 15 <33 F 5 <8 2 M <37 F <12 3 M <47 F <18 4 M >47 F >23 5 M >55 F >30 ABSOLUTE STRENGTH (Bench press & Leg press) Rating charts attached >16 21 - 2373 - <27 <21 <15 <7 <6 <5 <30 <24 <19 <10 <8 <7 <39 <30 <25 <15 <13 <20 >39 >30 >25 >20 >16 >12 >47 >39 >32 >24 >20 >15 �A • • lU • FITNESS STANDARDS (3) Fitness Points Gender Minimum 20 -29 30 -39 40 -49 50 -59 BODY FAT PERCENTAGE <25 <26 <27 <28 <27 <29 <31 <33 <20 <22 <24 <25 <24 <26 <28 <30 <16 <18 <20 <22 <21 <23 <25 <28 <12 <14 <16 <18 <18 <20 <22 <25 <10 <10 <12 <14 <12 <15 <17 <20 1 M F 2 M F 3 M F 4 M F 5 M >5 F >8 22 -2374- MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is entered into between the City of Mound (hereafter "Employer ") and Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Local No. 266 (hereafter "Union "). WHEREAS, the Employer and the Union are parties to a Labor Agreement covering employees in the positions of Police Officer, Investigator/Detective and Juvenile Officer; and WHEREAS, the Employer has contracted for police services with the City of Orono beginning on January 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Arbitrator's award for the 2011 -2012 contract granted the City's final position for vacation carry over limits as follows: An Employee may carry over up to one and one -half (1 -1/2) times earned vacation from one calendar year to the next. Employees with more than S years of service as of December 31,2011, will be grandfathered in at a limit of 480 hours (12 weeks) annual carryover; and WHEREAS, the fact that the Arbitrator's award was issued in the last quarter of the two year agreement does not permit adequate time for officers to spend down any overage in vacation accruals above the limits set forth above; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Employer will pay 100% of vacation accrued as of 12/31/12 to officers • covered under this agreement as called for with the Contract for Police Services with the City of Orono. IN WITNF1;S,WHEREOF, the arti s hereto have executed this Memorandum of Agreement on this day of 2012. FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES. INC., LOCAL 35 4 1- a - • -2375- Vii\ • CITY OF MOU MEMORANDUM October 16, 2012 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 5536 -1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: KANDIS M. HANSON, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: FIRE RELIEF PENSION CHANGES Please find the attached Actuarial Valuation as of 12/31/11 for the Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association Pension Plan prepared by VanIwaarden. This is the same data that was presented to the City Council at the April 10, 2012 meeting and the changes of which were • approved by the Council at that time. The Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association members also voted in favor of the changes at their annual meeting on October 1, 2012. Therefore, as a housekeeping issue, a formal City Council resolution was requested to be on record to complement the corresponding changes to the Relief- Association by -laws. If you have any questions regarding this resolution, please let Fire Chief Greg Pederson or I know. • -2376 - printed on recycled paper MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation Reflecting Plan Changes U April 24, 2012 Van Iwaarden Associates 840 Lumber Exchange Ten South Fifth Street Minneapolis MN 55402 -1010 612.596.5960 f: 612.596.5999 www.vaniwaarden.com • VANIWAARDEN MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation • Table of Contents Page Introduction and Actuarial Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Valuation of the Current Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Reconciliation of Plan Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Changes in the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Determination of Amortization Period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b Average Available Financing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Summary of Participant Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Summary of Changes in Membership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 • Summary of Plan Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Actuarial Methods and Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 • -2378- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation i s Introduction and Actuarial Certification Purposes of the valuation This report presents the results of the December 31, 2011 valuation for the Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association, Inc. Its primary purposes are: • to determine the annual municipal obligation to the plan, • to review the plan's funded status as of December 31, 2011, and • to document the actuarial impact of plan changes adopted during 2012. Sources of data The Relief Association supplied the December 31, 2011 data for all active and retired members. Wells Fargo supplied asset data for the special fund. We have relied on that data in preparing this report. Chances from the previous valuation This valuation reflects the plan changes approved by the Relief Association Board at their March 5, 2012 meeting. The changes are: • define monthly pension benefit as $30.25 times years of service subject to a maximum of 20 years, • new members and members with less than 10 years of service as of 1/1 /2012 will receive a lump sum of $5,585 times years of service at retirement with a maximum of 20 years, • members with 10 or more years of service as of 1/1 /2012 will have the option of taking a lump sum payment or a monthly annuity at retirement, • • a graded vesting schedule is added for members with service from 10 to 20 years, • the service cap will be extended to 25 years beginning 1/1/2013, and • the pre- retirement survivor annuity was changed to 100%. In addition, the plan was amended to remove the $3,000 lump sum funeral benefit. That benefit will be paid from a different fund so it is not valued as a liability for the Relief Association Plan. These plan changes necessitated some assumption changes as well. The termination assumption described on page 12 was added and the retirement rate assumption was modified. The prior actuarial valuation of the plan was prepared as of December 31, 2009. Summary of valuation results The actuarial accrued liability used for determining the minimum required contribution increased from $4,389,143 as of December 31, 2009 to $4,996,365 as of December 31, 2011. Special Fund assets increased from $3,755,091 as of December 31, 2009 to $4,026,747 as of December 31, 2011. The fund has increased its unfunded accrued liability from $634,052 to $969,618 due to plan changes. The municipal contribution based on the results of this report before any offset for State Aid is $198,816, up about $22,000 from $176,658 determined by the 2009 valuation. The State Aid amount is not yet known of course, but if it is $75,000 for 2012, the remaining minimum municipal obligation would be $123,816 annually for fiscal years ending 2012 and 2013. Since the budgeted municipal• contribution for 2012 is $143,625, the additional benefits are supported by adequate contributions. -2379- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation C7 Introduction and Actuarial Certification (continued) 2 Actuarial certification Chapter 356.216 of Minnesota Statues requires than an actuarial valuation of the fund be conducted periodically. The State Auditor has determined that a valuation must be conducted at least every two years. An actuarial valuation is a calculation to determine the normal cost and accrued liability of the fund and includes a determination of the payment necessary to amortize the unfunded liability over the stated period and a determination of the payment necessary to keep the unfunded liability from increasing. The funded ratio has decreased from 85.6% to 80.6% primarily due to plan changes. Any tax advice included in this report is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, to avoid any tax penalties. The actuarial assumptions and methods used to develop the financial disclosure amounts in this report were selected in accordance with the requirements of Government Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 25 (GASB 25). We are available to answer any questions on the material contained in this report, or to provide explanations or further details as may be appropriate. The undersigned credentialed actuaries meet the Qualification Standards of • the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained in this report. Respectfully submitted, Sandra L. Bruns, EA, FSA Consulting Actuary W U` Mark D. Meyer, JD, FSA Consulting Actuary April 24, 2012 L /D /C /R: 4 /ek /sb /mm • -2380- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation Valuation of the Current Plan A. Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) 1. Active members 2. Vested terminated members 3. Retired members 4. Spouses receiving benefits 5. Children receiving benefits 6. Disabled members receiving benefits 7. Total actuarial accrued liability B. Special fund assets C. Unfunded actuarial accrued liability D. Credit for surplus E. Amortization payment 1. Amortization period 2. Payment F. Normal cost G. Annual contribution payable 1. Preliminary contribution (D. + E. + F.) 2. Administrative expense (previous year x 1.035) 3. Annual contribution (1. + 2.) 4. Estimated State Aid 5. Est municipal contribution (3. + 4., not less than zero) H. Funded Status k] • • -2381- 2011 2009 Before Changes After Changes $ 1,325,849 $ 1,412,148 $ 1,774,444 329,285 248,367 311,839 2,472,347 2,579,527 2,667,715 261,662 234,354 242,367 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 4,389,143 $ 4,474,396 $ 4,996,365 $ 3,755,091 $ 4,026,747 $ 4,026,747 $ 634,052 $ 447,649 $ 969,618 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 10 8 1 $ 78,203 $ 65,963 $ 111,17 $ 91,621 $ 85,529 $ 80,342 2010, 2011 2012, 2013 2012, 2013 $ 169,824 $ 151,492 $ 191,515 6,834 7,301 7,301 $ 176,658 $ 158,793 $ 198,816 (81,300) (75,000) (75,000) $ 95,358 $ 83,793 $ 123,816 85.6% 90.0% 80.6% • -2381- t. MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation Reconciliation of Plan Assets • 1. Value of assets on December 31 2. Contributions for the year a. Municipal contributions b. State contributions c. Supplemental benefits d. Total contributions 3. Benefits paid during the year 4. Expenses (non - investment) paid from plan assets 5. Investment earnings for the year 6. Asset value on December 31 (sum of 1. thru 5.) 7. Approximate rate of return a. By year b. Two year period 4 2010 2011 $ 3,755,091 $ 4,137,018 130,355 172,592 78,104 74,362 0 0 208,459 246,954 (236,479) (17,960) (243,252) (7,054) 427,906 (106,918) $ 4,137,018 $ 4,026,747 11.5% -2.6% 4.2% -2382- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation I✓ • Changes in the Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability A. Liability Rain or loss 1. Expected actuarial accrued liability (AAL) a. AAL as of December 31, 2009 b. Normal cost 2010 c. Normal cost 2011 d. Benefit payments 2010 e. Benefit payments 2011 (estimated) f. Interest to December 31, 2011 on a. through e. g. Expected AAL on December 31, 2011 (sum of a. through f.) 2. Actual AAL on December 31, 2011 a. Before any assumption, method or plan changes b. After assumption and method changes, but before plan changes c. After assumption, method and plan changes 3. Difference from the expected AAL a. (Gain) or loss due to plan experience diff from that expected (2.a. - 1.e.) b. Due to changes in actuarial assumptions and methods (2.b. - 2.a.) c. Due to plan changes (2.c. - 2.b.) d. Total (a. + b. + c.) B. Asset Rain or loss 1. Expected value of assets a. Value of assets on December 31, 2009 b. Benefit payments c. Contributions d. Interest to December 31, 2011 on a., b. and c. e. Expected assets on December 30, 2011 (sum of a. through d.) 2. Actual assets as of December 31, 2011 a. Before any assumption or method changes b. After assumption and method changes 3. Difference from the expected assets a. (Gain) or loss due to plan exp diff from expected (1e. - 2a.) b. Due to changes in actuarial assumptions Ft methods (2a. - 2b.) c. Total (a. + b.) C. Changes in the unfunded actuarial accrued liability 1. Unfunded AAL on December 31, 2009 (A.1.a. - B. 1.a.) 2. Expected unfunded AAL on December 31, 2011 (A.1.e. - B.1.e.) 3. Changes a. Actuarial (gain) or loss (A.3.a. + B.3.a.) b. Changes in actuarial methods and assumptions (A.3.b. + B.3.b.) c. Changes in plan provisions (A.3.c.) d. Total change 4. Unfunded AAL on December 31, 2011 -2383- R 4,389,143 91,621 91,621 (236,479) (243,252) 439.896 4,532,550 4,541,049 4,541,049 4,996,365 8,499 0 455,316 463,815 • 3,755,091 (479,731) 455 370,582 4,101,355 4,026,747 4,026,747 74,608 0 74,608 634,052 431,195 83,107 0 455,316 • 538,423 969,618 MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation • Determination of Amortization Period 6 The amortization periods shown are required by Minnesota Statutes §69.773 Subd 4. Per Subd 4.(d)(3)(i) actuarial losses are amortized over 10 years. Per Subd 4.(d)(3)(v) increases in the UAL due to plan changes are amortized over 20 years. A. Amortization of actuarial losses 1. Unfunded AAL due to actuarial losses 83,107 2. Payment to amortize loss over 10 years 10,250 B. Amortization of prior UAL 1. AAL before plan and assumption changes 4,541,049 2. UAL before any change (not less than zero) 431,195 3. Prior amortization years (updated to valuation date) 8 4. Payment to amortize UAL over prior period 63,538 C. Amortization of plan chance 1. AAL after plan and assumption changes 4,996,365 2. UAL after changes (not less than zero) 969,618 • 3. Change in UAL for plan and assumption changes 455,316 4. Payment to amortize over 20 years 34,796 D. Total amortization Payments 108,584 E. Period to amortize UAL after changes by payments in D. 11 • -2384- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation Average Available Financing State City Credit for Aid Contrib Surplus 2009 $ 75,889 $ 133,500 $ 0 2010 78,104 130,355 0 2011 74,362 172,592 0 Average available financing for 2012: Minimum required for $30.25 monthly benefit: Maximum monthly benefit permitted: Maximum lump sum benefit permitted: 7 0 � Notes: • The State Aid and City Contributions shown are those made during the calendar year indicated. • The number of active members is from the State Reporting Form for the year indicated, that is, the number as of December 31 • The average available financing for 2012 is the average for the three years preceeding 2012 (2009 to 2011). See • Minnesota Statutes S424A.02. • -2385- Active Average Total Members Financing $ 209,389 43 $ 4,870 208,459 39 5,345 246,954 41 6,023 $ 5,413 2,511 66 10,000 7 0 � Notes: • The State Aid and City Contributions shown are those made during the calendar year indicated. • The number of active members is from the State Reporting Form for the year indicated, that is, the number as of December 31 • The average available financing for 2012 is the average for the three years preceeding 2012 (2009 to 2011). See • Minnesota Statutes S424A.02. • -2385- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation � 0 Summary of Participant Data A. Active emv /ovees 1. Number 2. Average age 3. Average years of service E3 2009 2011 43 41 39.2 40.0 10.4 11.5 B. Vested terminated em /� ovees 1. Number 4 3 2. Total annual deferred benefits $28,080 $21,780 3. Average annual benefit 7,020 7,260 C. Retirees 1. Number 29 31 2. Total annual benefits being paid $203,580 $225,060 3. Average annual benefit being paid 7,020 7,260 D. Widows • 1. Number 6 5 2. Total annual benefits being paid $31,590 $27,225 3. Average annual benefit being paid 5,265 5,445 E. Children 1. Number 0 0 2. Total annual benefits being paid $0 $0 3. Average annual benefit being paid n/a n/a F Total number of aai ticiaants (A.1. + B.1. + C.1. + 2.1. + E.1, l 82 80 • -2386- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation 9 0 � Summary of Changes in Membership A. Members on December 31. 2009 B. Changes in the member group 1. New active members 2. Retirements 3. Separation, deferred lump sum 4. Separation, not vested 5. Separation, disability benefit 6. Deaths 7. Lump sum distributions 8. Rehire 9. Total changes C. Members on December 31, 2011 41 3 31 5 80 • C7 -2387- Terminated Active Vested Retired Beneficiaries Total 43 4 29 6 82 3 3 (1) ( 3 0 ( 1 0 ( (3) 0 {1) (1) (2) 0 0 ( ( 2 ( ( 41 3 31 5 80 • C7 -2387- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. 10 December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation • Summary of Plan Provisions A. Plan provisions as of December 31, 2011 1. Eligibility: (a) Members covered: Members of the Mound Volunteer Fire Department Relief Association, Inc. after having served a one year probationary period. Minimum age is age 18. 2. Retirement dates: (a) Normal retirement: The later of age 50 or after completion of 20 years of service. 3. Pension Amounts: (a) Monthly Service Pension: 1) For active members with less than 10 years of service as of 1/1 /2012: $5,585 per year of service up to 20 years paid as a lump sum at normal retirement. The service cap is increased to 25 years effective 1 / 1 /2013. 2) For active members with 10 or more years of service as of 1/1 /2012: $30.25 per month per year of service up to 20 years paid as a life annuity starting at normal retirement, or • $5,585 per year of service up to 20 years paid as a lump sum at normal retirement. • • The service cap is increased to 25 years effective 1 /1 /2013. (b) Deferred Service Pension: 1) The Monthly Service Pension payable at age 50 multiplied by the following vesting schedule: Years of Service Vested Percent Less than 10 0% 10 60% 11 64% 12 68% 13 72% 14 76% 15 80% 16 84% 17 88% 18 92% 19 96% 20 100% 5. Death and Survivor Benefits: (a) If an active member dies, his spouse (or children if there is no spouse) will receive the member's accrued benefit without regard to vesting, payable immediately. (b) If a deferred or retired member dies, his spouse (or children if there is no spouse) will receive 75% of the member's accrued benefit payable immediately. (c) If there is not spouse or children, then the beneficiary will receive a lump sum equal to 60 times $30.25 per year of service. MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. 11 • December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation Summary of Plan Provisions B. Plan provisions effective after December 31, 2011 On 1/1 /2013 the service cap increases from 20 years to 25 years. We have reflected this change in the calculation of the cash contributions. C. Changes in plan provisions since prior year • The monthly benefit has changed from $29.25 per month to $30.25 per month after 20 years of service at normal retirement. For retirements on or after January 1, 2013, the 20 year limit on credited service is increased to 25. • An optional lump sum benefit of $5,585 for each year of service has been added for active members with ten or more years of service on January 1, 2012. For retirements on or after January 1, 2013, the 20 year limit on credited service is increased to 25. • For active members with fewer than ten years of service on January 1, 2012, a lump sum benefit of $5,585 for each year of service up to 25 replaces the old $585 per month annuity benefit after 20 or more years of service. • The accrued benefit is now vested after 10 years of service. The vesting schedule is shown in the table on the previous page. • The funeral benefit is no longer valued since it is not paid from the Special Fund. • • -2389- MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION, INC. December 31, 2011 Actuarial Valuation • Actuarial Methods and Assumptions A. Economic Assumptions Interest rate 5.00% B. Demoeraphic Assumptions Mortality 1971 Group Annuity Mortality Table Turnover Turnover rates are based on 50% of the SOA Basic Age Turnover and 50% of PERA Police and Fire. Sample rates are: Age Rate 20 11.74% 25 10.88% 30 7.05% 35 5.12% 40 4.13% 45 3.56% 50 0.00% Retirement 50% after age 50 and 20 years of service 5% for each year from 21 to 29 and age 50 100% after age 50 and 30 years of service 100% at age 65 regardless of service Form of payment For participants with at least 10 years of service on 1/ 1 /2012: . 50% will choose a life annuity, joint and 75% to survivor for married participants and 50% will choose the lump sum option. For participants with less than 10 years of service on 1/1 /2012: Lump sum Marital status All members are assumed to be married with wives 3 years younger than husbands. C. Actuarial Methods 12 • Normal Cost and Actuarial The Entry Age Normal actuarial cost method. This actuarial funding Accrued Liability method is one of the projected benefit cost methods. The normal cost for each active member is the annual amount required from the member's entry date to retirement date so that the accumulated contributions at termination or retirement will equal the liability at that time. This cost is expressed as a level annual amount. • Actuarial Value of Assets The actuarial value of assets is equal to the market value of assets. • Benefits Valued All benefits summarized in the plan provisions section of this report. D. Changes in assumptions and methods from the prior year • The following assumptions were changed: • Retirement rates were changed from 100% at the later of age 53 and 20 years of service to the rates shown above. • The following assumptions were added: • • Turnover rates were added for the January 1, 2012 valuation. • We assumed that for those participants with a choice of a lump sum payment or monthly benefits, that 50% wilt choose a lump sum. -2390- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- • RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CHANGES TO THE MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION PENSION PLAN WHEREAS, a pension plan alternatives study was completed by Van Iwaarden Associates to provide actuarial cost estimates for the impact in changes in actuarial assumptions and benefit levels of proposed changes to the Mound Fire Department Relief Association Pension Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes were presented to and approved by the City of Mound City Council at the April 10, 2012 regular meeting; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes were approved by the required majority of the Mound Fire Department Relief Association members at the Annual General Meeting held on October 1, 2012; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby approves the changes to the Mound Fire Department Relief Association Pension Plan as summarized in Exhibit A, and made a part herein. • Adopted by the City Council this 23 day of October, 2012. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -2391- yS O NMN O Cq =+N • y �N* ~ O �00aO N 00 � 9 0. � N C-) ClO 0 Op'� N j o a cfs C> cn w >w � � � � o 4 cd d ti In 0 o 0 �N s9Cd ° =° ° w -d' .0z o 4. ° a� ti a� 2 4. Q" np a a Q c ° ° 4, -d o w > CA cd %� rr N �L, `3 v , ° N .. .. :j ° b O ti cd cq • r -- N M � kn �,c t' cl � N M cd t8 w N N ti 3 'y C o td bq y bq C N �' O O .D O N° O N N bA v1 O v � � O �" r '' �, O •� V >> ►il o C)� 4 cd y y •-+ rte+ o cd c4 C� v� .� cd ° 4- O L " O 4a �, >+ s •� O + N O ff' bA �, cd c o 0 ti .o cn 0 O 7:1 o v' == a 0 Q" oNO a 1-4 ° 0. o a� to B cd O a� o o° o o o >, o O a� a� v� 4) 0., o N W >ZZ z - )mz n t4. N P, R'! U S O O rn In c� v - WI y Q .� CJ � � W • •� c z c - 2392 - c C. a w� w z 5341 Maywood Road • Mound, MN 55364 City of Mound (952) 472-0604 1 Planning and Building Department Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council. FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 17, 2012 APPLICANT: Steve Hudak REQUEST: Variance CASE NUMBERS: 12 -21 LOCATION: 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard PROPERTY ID: 19- 117 -23 -31 -0077 ZONING: R -1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential REQUEST. At its October 16, 2012 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a "new" variance application from Steve Hudak to construct a 26'x24' detached garage at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard. Per code, the required setback (front /corner) for the proposed structure in the subject location is 30 feet. The proposed new garage, at the closest point, would be located 5 feet from the front (west) property • line abutting Tuxedo Boulevard. BACKGROUND. There is an existing single family house at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard. The subject property, which is accessed via a driveway on Tuxedo Boulevard, includes frontage along both Tuxedo Boulevard and Manchester Road. There is no garage on the subject property. According to Hennepin County tax records, the house was constructed in 1918 and the current owner purchased the property in May 2001. There is an existing hedge /berm on the west side abutting Tuxedo Boulevard. A variance was approved for the property in 2001 (Resolution No. 01 -78) granting a 10 foot front setback variance to construct a new 24'x24' detached garage. The City Council reaffirmed the variance in July 2012 (Resolution No. 12 -67) following a request from the owner as there was 1 -year clause for variances in the zoning ordinance at the time it was approved. This clause was subsequently removed in 2009. It was recently learned that the resolution that approved the front setback variance was based on an inaccurate measurement from the garage to the front property line along Tuxedo Boulevard. Therefore, it has been determined that a "new" variance is required. Information regarding the 2001 variance request is on file in the Planning Department and will be provided upon request; also 2012 variance reaffirmation. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RECOMMENDATION. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval as recommended by Staff. A draft resolution, based on the Planning Commission's recommendation, has been included for consideration / action by the Council. The 10 -16- 2012 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts (draft) have been included • -2393- • 0 RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2928 TUXEDO BOULEVARD AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 01-078 AND RESOLUTION NO. 12 -67 WHEREAS, the City Council, at its September 25, 2001 meeting, adopted Resolution No. 01 -078, which approved a variance for the property at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard, subject to conditions, to allow construction of a new detached 2 -car garage. Resolution No. 01 -78 was recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on October 4, 2001 and, therefore, is of record; and WHEREAS, the City Council at its July 10, 2012 meeting, adopted Resolution No. 12 -67 reaffirming its approval of the variance approved by Resolution No.01 -078. Resolution No. 12 -67 was recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on August 31, 2012; and WHEREAS, Staff determined that a new variance was required due inaccurate information for the front setback measurement and the change to the size of the detachged garage; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Steve Hudak, submitted a variance application on October 11, 2012, to construct a 26' x 24' detached garage at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard; and WHEREAS, there is an existing single family house at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard. The subject property, which is accessed via a driveway on Tuxedo Boulevard, includes frontage along both Tuxedo Boulevard and Manchester Road. There is no garage on the subject property. According to Hennepin County tax records, the house was constructed in 1918 and the current owner purchased the property in May 2001. There is an existing hedge /berm on the west side abutting Tuxedo Boulevard; and WHEREAS, per code, the "front" of the lot is deemed to be Manchester Road and Tuxedo Boulevard is, therefore, required to have a corner /front setback of 30 feet. The applicant requested variance approval to allow a 5 foot front/comer setback for construction of a 26 wide by 24 deep detached garage to be located in the NW comer of the property. The proposed rear setback to the north property line, at the closest point, is 4.1 feet. In this location, a 4 -foot rear setback is required and has been met; and WHEREAS, the requested variance is described as follows: Variance Front/Corner Setback (West Side) Required Requested 30 FT 5 FT 25 FT ; and -2394- Resolution No. 12- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its October 16, 2012 meeting, reviewed the • variance application materials, the Planning Report (PC Case No. 12 -21) and all related supporting information and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Council does hereby approve the requested variance to allow construction of a new 26' x 14' detached garage, as proposed by the applicant, based on the following findings of fact based on the record: A. Criteria in City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. B. There is currently no garage on the subject property. Having a garage on a residential property is usual and customary and the opportunity to have all- weather protection for vehicles and interior storage is viewed as positive. C. The garage will be located approximately 18 feet from the east curbline of Tuxedo Blvd. D. There is a road easement on the subject property along Tuxedo • Boulevard. E. The lot is irregularly shaped and has varied topography. Construction of a structure in the NW corner of the property is the only location which is functional as placement of a structure in the south portion of the property would affect drainage. F. The slope easement on the subject property is not negatively affected. G. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. H. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. I. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. J. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County. • -2395- Resolution No. 12- 2. The variance is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: • A. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. B. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. C. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met D. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County. E. Evidence that MCWD permit, if required has been obtained for the project and /or verification from the MCWD that no permit is required. F. With the exception of the front setback, the proposed detached garage / accessory structure shall conform with the regulations in the City Code in all regards. • G. All fees incurred as part of the City's review of the variance request shall be paid by the applicant. 3. The variance is approved for the following legally described property: ( -to be inserted-) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. Resolution No. 01 -078 is hereby rescinded. 2. Resolution No. 12 -67 is hereby rescinded. Adopted by the City Council this 23` day of October, 2012. Mark Hanus, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -2396- MINUTE EXCERPT MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 16, 2012 ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert, Jeffrey Bergquist and Councilmember Ray Salazar. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Planning Commission Secretary Jill Norlander, Planning Consultant Rita Trapp from HKGi. Others present: Steve Hudak, 2928 Tuxedo Blvd; Brent HiMjWnergy Land Company BOARD OF APPEALS Case No. 12 -21 Variance Location: 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard Smith introduced the application. Previously, in 2 front setback to construct a 24'x24'`, e. The app the 1 year required. The variance wais'� ea Med application that followed it was found tit tjte measurement of the front lot line was incorrect. ,' found that anew variance was required. Based on site elevations and previous engineers approval of the variance in the requested location Steve Hudak was grant6o *r a 10 foot not construct tharage within ear. During review of the permit for was 24'x 26' and the information it was mmendations, Staff is recommending The presence of the slope easements was questioned: Staff indicated that the slope easements don't appear to have a purpose at this time. They may have been related to the construction of the berm with the previous road project. Linkert asked the applicant if he considered attaching the garage to the house. Steve Hudak, 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard, indicated that it would isolate the rest of his back yard in addition to not being able to match the existing brick on the house. He also stated that, in the winter, the area south of the house has been slid into several times by traffic from Tuxedo Boulevard. Salazar said that, after visiting on site with the applicant, it was a reasonable request and a very necessary amenity given our winter weather. Retterath thought that, given the topography, he was in favor of the proposal. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Goode, to recommend approval of the variance as submitted in accordance with the conditions established by Staff. MOTION carried unanimously. 0 • • -2397- • 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 11, 2012 MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 APPLICANT: Steve Hudak REQUEST: Variance CASE NUMBERS: 12 -21 LOCATION: 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard PROPERTY ID: 19-117-23-31-0077 ZONING: R -1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential REQUEST • The Planning Commission will review a "new" variance application from Steve Hudak to construct a 26'x24' detached garage at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard. Per code, the required setback (front /corner) for the proposed structure in the subject location is 30 feet. The proposed new garage, at the closest point, would be located 5 feet from the front (west) property line abutting Tuxedo Boulevard. SITE CONDITIONS There is an existing single family house at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard. The subject property, which is accessed via a driveway on Tuxedo Boulevard, includes frontage along both Tuxedo Boulevard and Manchester Road. There is no garage on the subject property. According to Hennepin County tax records, the house was constructed in 1918 and the current owner purchased the property in May 2001. There is an existing hedge /berm on the west side abutting Tuxedo Boulevard. BACKGROUND. A variance was approved for the property in 2001 (Resolution No. 01 -78) granting a 10 foot front setback variance to construct a new 24'x24' detached garage. The City Council reaffirmed the variance in July 2012 (Resolution No. 12 -67) following a request from the owner as there was 1 -year clause for variances in the zoning ordinance at the time it was approved. This clause was subsequently removed in 2009. It was recently learned that the resolution that approved the front setback variance was based on an inaccurate measurement from the garage to the front property line along Tuxedo Boulevard. Therefore, it has been determined that a "new" variance is required. Information regarding the 2001 variance request is on file in the Planning Department and will be provided upon request, also 2012 variance reaffirmation. • mac•: • REVIEW PROCEDURES. 2011 Amendments to Variance Regulations. Mound Ordinance No. 03 -2011 became effective on October 23, 2011 and included new regulations for variances following modifications to Minnesota State Statutes that were adopted by the legislature earlier in 2011 and were in response to the 2010 MN Supreme Court decision, sometimes referred to as the " Krummenacher case ",which made granting variances difficult. The Krumencacher ruling stated that a City could only grant a variance when an applicant had demonstrated that the property could not be put to any reasonable use without it. Generally speaking, the 2011 ordinance amendments for variances are summarized as follows: 1) Inclusion of new definitions for "Practical Difficulties" and "Unique ". 2) Removal of the "Undue Hardship" definition; and 3) The City's regulations for variance approval were revised for consistency with the 2011 legislation which included removal and /or modification of the variance standards previously contained in Mound's code. The definition of "Practical Difficulties" per code following the 2011 ordinance amendments is as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: N The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the • zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The definition of "Unique" per code following the 2011 ordinance amendments is as follows: Unique as used in conjunction with the granting of a variance means that the circumstances on which the request for a variance is based are not common or unusual in properties having the some zoning. • -2399- • Variance Standards. City Code Section 129 -39 (a) contains the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and are provided as follows: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the some zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. • TIMELINE FOR AGENCY ACTION Minnesota State Statutes (MSS) 15.99 requires approval and /or denial of land use applications within 60 days unless the City executes an extension. Additionally, the provisions of MSS 15.99 also allow an applicant to extend the decision timeline. The variance application was submitted and deemed to be complete on October 11, 2012. DISCUSSION 1. The subject property includes a single family home with street frontage on Manchester Road and Tuxedo Boulevard. It is a non - lakeshore lot. Tax records indicate the house was constructed in 1918. The current owner purchased the property in May 2001. 2. Per code, the "front" of the lot is deemed to be Manchester Road and Tuxedo is therefore required to have a corner /front setback. The required setback for the detached garage from the front property line is 30 feet. The applicant is proposing a 5 foot setback. 3. As noted on the survey, a road easement was taken in front of the subject property. 4. The submitted survey dated October 11, 2012 shows a 26 wide by 24 deep detached garage to be located in the NW corner of the property. The proposed rear setback to the north property line, at the closest point, is 4.1 feet. In this location, a 4 -foot rear setback is required and therefore has been met. • 1 111 5. The previous variance approved a 24'x24' detached garage in the subject location. Staff discussed a "common" size with the Building Official who commented that 24'x24' or 24'x26' is considered normal by today's standards. is 6. The slope easement noted on the survey which is in the vicinity of the proposed garage is not affected by the project based upon review by Public Works Staff. 7. Staff deems a garage on the property to allow for all- season storage for vehicles and other related purposes as very reasonable and is particularly beneficial for winter conditions. 8. The lot is irregularly shaped and has varied topography. 9. Construction of a new garage triggers the code requirement for a hard surface driveway. 10. Information provided on the hardcover calculation sheet shows the property under the 40 percent allowance. 11. The proposed project including "new" variance was reviewed and discussed with the Consultant Planner, City Attorney, Public Works Director, Public Works Supervisor and Building Official. 12. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain and erosion control are in effect; also others. Applicant is advised that these rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as rules regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. The applicant is requested to contact the MCWD regarding the new regulations and applicable permits that may be • needed to undertake the proposed lakeside deck project. Any future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance (as applicable) and /or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. SITE INSPECTION Planning Commission members are encouraged to visit the site prior to the meeting. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Planning Commission approval of the variance application for the property at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard subject to the following conditions: 1. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. -2401- 3. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions • have been met. 4. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County. 5. Evidence that MCWD permit, if required has been obtained for the project and /or verification from the MCWD that no permit is required. 6. With the exception of the front setback, the proposed detached garage / accessory structure shall conform with the regulations in the City Code in all regards. in recommending Staff approval of the requested variance, the following findings of fact are provided: 1. Criteria in City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. There is currently no garage on the subject property. Having a garage on a residential property is usual and customary and the opportunity to have all- weather protection for vehicles and interior storage is viewed as positive. 3. The garage will be located approximately 18 feet from the east curbline of Tuxedo Blvd. 4. There is a road easement on the subject property along Tuxedo Boulevard. 5. The lot is irregularly shaped and has varied topography. Construction of a structure in the NW corner of the property is the only location which is functional as placement of a structure in the south portion of the property would affect drainage. • 6. The slope easement on the subject property is not negatively affected. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its October 16, 2012 meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration /action at its Tuesday, October 23, 2012 meeting, if possible. • -2402- An VARIANCE C 40 � 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 APPLICATION 1, Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952 - 472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date k) (.:=� Case No. City Council Date �& a (o Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address 5L.V D PROPERTY Lot LEGAL Block DESC. Subdivisio 1A PID # / / '! .-2 --?/ — 6j ,� , 7Z Zonin . R R1A R2 R3 131 62 83 (circle one) PROPERTY Name 51L PHEN f : YU PA K Email OWNER Address 2 7 Z k. & L VP . C2 7 /yA Phone Home Work Fax APPLICANT Name `) TEP /tEl A {�� Email (IF OTHER 7 Address THAN OWNER) 612 - 03 -94 f `' phone Home Work Fax 0 1. Has an application ever b en made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes QN No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of r solutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): - 2 6 6L(-d- Iz A�4 26' 46 oa// Wea.0 Variance Information -2403- (2/29/2012) Page 4 of 6 Case No. • 3. Do the existing structures comply wit o all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning P , district in which it is located? Yes (X) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) 55 D ft . (04 �� Front Yard: ( N S) A612 Side Yard: (N S E W) Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. : (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft. • Lot Size: 11072- sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (�), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape K6ther: specify Please describe: > ��Je-c f 4-s rim ` iA `j `, i � �'� 2,) S e ` C-1 07f4,t • Variance Information -2404- (2/29/2012) Page 5 of 6 Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of n one having property interests 1 the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No (. If yes, explain: 7. Was the , / p ractical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (2<), No ( ). If yes, explain: 7 v / Pt 6P ;e, mv- _ rope r � L1 cr /0 -f q 4 Tc� xPd S 1J - �7 f- -f,, c� �� p��+�rfy -r''r�►� r��xu�� 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (6, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: b4 rK rh 2- o o J Lvht 4 rej L, te ek Vctr, v�C� ("olk a - a dtit0�t -GTr� -Ike C lyft( c?r.� (s�� ✓��? 5fre —e , A f - kr �4. -4C .5 a �Pv,-) _ < %trVe �f IPa rye I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signatu Applicant's 41 _ Date Date f �� Variance Information -2405- (2/29/2012) Page 6 of 6 , DORCHE'�T�R RoAi� - CJ V u 0 CSI u c`I v? N N 1 ' � I s 1 , CP 5RATE r"' i�•l 74 �) I / 1 X 31 1 447 .1 , \� i ; :VS CE GRATE f� cs GFfi ?F,' 1 0 I It / i I , 1 ,• � \ \ byT� � – IT \ \ / \ i 1 t I I I \ r s house #/2928 1=5 Sp. Feet C7 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 , 1 , 1 ; 1 , rr.� 7 IN \ 1 / I r gip i � • jf S� T \. r \\ i F '� 1 J i r r Dwlnc• jy l ' � ' • f` –' ,' � 1 ; ; ' I Sa /d –crnp< <os<m \ \ �� V S. ^- Y I 1 i house A , y \\ i 11 I; /1 / n 1 I 11 T I \ I I r � � , \ I( I I i _I_• l oc4 m " f ' ' rz' � i _ \ t ' CP, GPAT -:j 548;9 7 lYJ \\ ° tah!L71_E 1_gV�E'F ` i I 1 1 1 \, I l l I 1 t �' i�, i' � 1 11 i , i 1 i 1 I I i � I 1 1 , I t I' vv v L j - \ ""SIC V ►;' '/ r A o I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I nw¢lz•.r/ ,.�. \S Q v MANHOLE `o'r ts, _ – G y ,.1- 1, f \. 4. , 1 `, '• 1 1 \1q 1 1 / ' 1 \` _ _S.C.S cw "s`i,{2 - ,` �•, i\ \ Q \ \ \ \ � 1 \ ;. ' 11 1 , s� 1 1 ', ,, �_ LEGAL DESC IPTION' - - -- y 0 \ 951.5 a B GP.A!E The PROPERTY acc rdina is Itfcr.\e of Ti,Ie,No11 1066r' {� ,d \,` \•`l i Lots 13 and 14, nd That,-p "art o?- ._Lots 15 and 16 Iviny" southwesterly of - line dro,n fro n It `on the �� .northwest Ely line o said L ot i5 Jislont i� �'ee1 narthec+gterly Y from the ost we erly iorrYSr or sT.Tid !_at 15 \ fz a point 'On. 1 the sout easterly line of said Lot 16.., distant "2,6 feet northeaste ly from he most soutAerly corner -iDf soid Lnf `l6. '\ �, ; �• 1 '1 All in Bloc 17, , s 1 'v N Subject t0 In {ereSt 5bawn - lit rrern OYIG15 In said l.tttifi ^ate \of it i , CL a The PR ERTY Title No. 106662.1 which inciude: Ca•1 Docur hd 1 1 I %/ T d i 915673 favoring C y of )Round: - Grmonent reed easer�len( 1 11 li < oN O over part a Lots 13; 14 and 15; {bi T,lo�ument No. ';a,15�7a1 I l NOM 1 �.Ci• 9 l 1,\ 1) Elerotian, me o,cbrdm o City amd i —c-nn— too nut hyd—t at nr m nd nd; permanent slooe eos_ - rent ove`t p9rt', `� 11 '1 ` TNN at Tu *ado Plyd and Manche ter Lane. NN «Ievalbn 1•. 953. T8ft 2) line Georirgs mp o sumed. eith the roper south —t line o1 the Pty osfumed as / =-o,th d eee egr 30 mnute, 46 fecund- 52 West. he note: asphalt pavement in street excluded 3) Land markers found m set M the ground during this yzrvey / monent slope ea --mcn` 6 Part `vof'don i) • Iron PIP- 1-1/d mark found in ground (,Alas, noted olhere -e). ertificote of ?i'JF No. 106662' 1 • Iron rod )M d mark sA.l in grcwnd. Tlq; is a ploslie coo inscr ?God PLS 23266. / rn (b IJ / 00 Ali. v m 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 , 1 , 1 ; 1 , rr.� 7 IN \ 1 / I r gip i � • jf S� T \. r \\ i F '� 1 J i r r Dwlnc• jy l ' � ' • f` –' ,' � 1 ; ; ' I Sa /d –crnp< <os<m \ \ �� V S. ^- Y I 1 i house A , y \\ i 11 I; /1 / n 1 I 11 T I \ I I r � � , \ I( I I i _I_• l oc4 m " f ' ' rz' � i _ \ t ' CP, GPAT -:j 548;9 7 lYJ \\ ° tah!L71_E 1_gV�E'F ` i I 1 1 1 \, I l l I 1 t �' i�, i' � 1 11 i , i 1 i 1 I I i � I 1 1 , I t I' vv v L j - \ ""SIC V ►;' '/ r A o I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I nw¢lz•.r/ ,.�. \S Q v MANHOLE `o'r ts, _ – G y ,.1- 1, f \. 4. , 1 `, '• 1 1 \1q 1 1 / ' 1 \` _ _S.C.S cw "s`i,{2 - ,` �•, i\ \ Q \ \ \ \ � 1 \ ;. ' 11 1 , s� 1 1 ', ,, �_ LEGAL DESC IPTION' - - -- y 0 \ 951.5 a B GP.A!E The PROPERTY acc rdina is Itfcr.\e of Ti,Ie,No11 1066r' {� ,d \,` \•`l i Lots 13 and 14, nd That,-p "art o?- ._Lots 15 and 16 Iviny" southwesterly of - line dro,n fro n It `on the �� .northwest Ely line o said L ot i5 Jislont i� �'ee1 narthec+gterly Y from the ost we erly iorrYSr or sT.Tid !_at 15 \ fz a point 'On. 1 the sout easterly line of said Lot 16.., distant "2,6 feet northeaste ly from he most soutAerly corner -iDf soid Lnf `l6. '\ �, ; �• 1 '1 All in Bloc 17, ELEVATIONS & DRAINAGE plan elevXtion li— platl., c Itour UU- existi) \,contour y�SF - - -- dra /age " direction �•�-- / , s Z g N Subject t0 In {ereSt 5bawn - lit rrern OYIG15 In said l.tttifi ^ate \of it i , CL a The PR ERTY Title No. 106662.1 which inciude: Ca•1 Docur hd 1 1 I %/ T d i 915673 favoring C y of )Round: - Grmonent reed easer�len( 1 11 li < oN O over part a Lots 13; 14 and 15; {bi T,lo�ument No. ';a,15�7a1 I l //o exist�(ng features " 1 �.Ci• 9 l 1,\ fovorinq Cit of M _ nd; permanent slooe eos_ - rent ove`t p9rt', `� 11 '1 ` asphalt pavement ' of Lots 13, 14 an _15 -`-Ic� Document �!o. 1721779'\ favaritg he note: asphalt pavement in street excluded ii Citv of Mou d• n monent slope ea --mcn` 6 Part `vof'don i) described in said ertificote of ?i'JF No. 106662' ELEVATIONS & DRAINAGE plan elevXtion li— platl., c Itour UU- existi) \,contour y�SF - - -- dra /age " direction �•�-- / N s Z g N CL 11072 CL a The PR ERTY 0 C m 0 C4 0 no 005.63 plan garage K O Z C CD ' pl pavement oN O < O1 //o exist�(ng features " . w E. house s 001.58 asphalt pavement ELEVATIONS & DRAINAGE plan elevXtion li— platl., c Itour UU- existi) \,contour y�SF - - -- dra /age " direction �•�-- / C / Z g N 0 11072 100.00 The PR ERTY n 7 Z� 4 g C4 0 a 005.63 plan garage a ' ELEVATIONS & DRAINAGE plan elevXtion li— platl., c Itour UU- existi) \,contour y�SF - - -- dra /age " direction �•�-- / / IMPERVKMOUWACES (sq.ft) AREA / ITEM / 11072 100.00 The PR ERTY Plan Garage; Boundaries; Topography plan feat re .3 0624 005.63 / IMPERVKMOUWACES (sq.ft) AREA PERCENT ITEM / 11072 100.00 The PR ERTY Plan Garage; Boundaries; Topography plan feat re .3 0624 005.63 plan garage 0912 008.24 pl pavement //o exist�(ng features " 1225 011.06 house 0175 001.58 asphalt pavement 0112 001.01 wall stoops(2) he note: asphalt pavement in street excluded >> � S'[1R1 "02VS CrAMICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPCCIPCATION. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME C•R UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOP UNDER THL LAWS Or THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. NAME' JAMES MIC FL BRIDELL. P.L.S. - J'GNAIURE _ _ _ _ __ _ ___ ______ ___ Profession and Anveyc•. Minnesota Lice— No. 23266 Firm No . State Ergineering & Surveying Inc. This cerliflcalion is limited to pion garage and current site conditions. the +vg t Milk olbn are Aer renaratl or MhvMae rod for unrvlhrwrsad cnpien Wh. 1 4 t o m <s or —i other m to tualwnn a agent Ue algnoture. antl • •rlA+ hw<Gy d. D r^ rHY on " ^azlh<rized cnpiee. < wn•.h ma be Iraudul<nl Inca sct. er oneoua d •, krro t 1 nd rel—I inls,,a. , ami;ted This M•wnunt is -,,,hied .,a mlend•d for o -per pc LAND SURVEY $ Plan Garage; Boundaries; Topography £ W 9 3 off• • h \\ V %r tz) 00 Gel) jy go ,21 3ldVW z snoq A co a 3ldVW L9 i 9. 7ua�aso a dols, t, 9 1 1 k I .9 ok rl3 ba N N Od om— 61 --w OA/ a xl'r.V6 C'9 6 0 N 6 x 'bS GZZ'L 9Z6Z# gsnoq 3 �o o ' I I 3cl .......... --------- 0'6-IP6 x % % % % % % "or %N. ic v W LL 3 U.1 -j 31va 61 0 C C f 0 N o Ea OL ' 3" . c :L "0 J -IN OD C\l 6 x 'bS GZZ'L 9Z6Z# gsnoq 3 �o o ' I I 3cl .......... --------- 0'6-IP6 x % % % % % % "or %N. % \t, ♦ %% % % I> % 3d\ o AT 3ldVW 0 •Cy -13 NVId J '�q / ' 4� 13 ' O tn C 3d O'OS;6 X Z' CL� V9 T-4 N4 col -"A ic v W LL U.1 -j % \t, ♦ %% % % I> % 3d\ o AT 3ldVW 0 •Cy -13 NVId J '�q / ' 4� 13 ' O tn C 3d O'OS;6 X Z' CL� V9 T-4 N4 col -"A • • L 915m _ F1►BSttENT THIS AfiR$S1t8I1'1`, atiade this `day of 198'8 ., between Robert X. L .ckholm and Lillian L. L . hu part iesof the first part, and Ta VI1JAGS OF ROUND, a 'municipal corporation under the laws of the State of !Minnesota, part of the second Part, BITylBB. SBTB:t That the part ie's of the first part. in con - sideration of the sum of OM Dd= AND O WOO AID VAttrAiUS COMS101"TION to in band: paid bx said party' of the s*oond palm. the ,r+acQipt' �TWre is hereby ac�wledged, do hereby grant and .conve unto. ttte said party► of the se0Z 4d par - *, itie aiuo- oessors and ins3gus, a permanent easelMeII� for the construction o#' �alopea of auto and tills -over and "rose tho tract ot . Parcel or land as and being :tn the County► of liepaepin. and Btato of -- Minus "Aot& 4oPcriLed as jolia*w', tcF -rllt An easement `� 0 4 in wridth over and aomme Lot .1S Blook 17 Avalon, aacor� to . the r64a d plat thereof'_ thx t fi�saQ +.a,.tv'tt ..k ei::, v..�_... ._. MM9 �•.... a16 A." Wvsz QrUMIOWJy corner' ox said Lot 1151 `' thenoR Bout westerly a o t' Xorthwester y l oat said Lo to the begi" of a curve havi a radius of 8.58.148. feet CsaY Northwesterly► line . of "Lot i5 and a line 6o feet Bast ''of measured at right angles to and parallel with the Bast �r1 line of kock. in sal Avalon being taage�t o said curve; thence iSou hweter! along said outvo a distance ot.SQ , ..'toot, and said Northwesterly ifue of said easement there tseiminating; asd An easement 15 in width over and a cros s Lctt 14, Slack 17, A,valom, according. to the recorded plat thereof the Northwest 1Y line •ot said easement being J4 curve having a radius of 84,4a feet, said curve belng te�►gentSal with t e t,Northwesterly line of said 8166k .17 and also t&agential- wit h . h line 60, . feet Nast. of measured at right angles to and para11e1 Vith, the Basterly> ai 1ine:of Bloa{c 14, Md Avalon; .and IN T8$TIMOXY spy,. the said paxt:i„ es Lam hereunto set x k � their hands the day and year first above written. r Z the presence air:. :?P vwDerz in. L YPM O JJAJ Y STATE OF KINNESMA) ~ . >SN. Comm OF HE Tm On this day of R=t�X.�LY; olm and L L La n L ycktiola husband and wife to me aescaaaen zn anci wtao exacefad - -ti forego acknooledged that t:he executed the sa LIr 1868, L Lbefore W onallY a` eared mots to be .the .perno# g instrument and as their frepe act ; anti deed. • CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12 -67 RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING RESOLUTION NO. 01-78 APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2928 TUXEDO BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the City Council, at its September 25, 2001 meeting, adopted Resolution No. 01- . 78, which approved a variance for the property at 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard, subject to conditions, to allow construction of a new detached 2 -car garage; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 01 -78 was recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on October 4, 2001 and therefore is of record; and WHEREAS, at the time the variance was approved, the City Code variance regulations had a one (1) year validity clause; and WHEREAS, due to unforeseen circumstances, the project that was the subject of the variance was not undertaken by the property owner within the one (1) year requirement; and WHEREAS, the one (1) year time period for variance use was removed as part of the City Code recodification project that was adopted in 2009. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby reaffirms its approval of the variance as approved by Resolution No. 01 -78 to allow construction of a new detached garage and makes the following findings: 1. The one (1) year timeline for use of the variance that was in effect the time the variance was approved was removed from the City Code in 2009. C J -2410- Resolution No. 12 -67 • This variance is approved for the following legally described property: Lots 13 and 14, Block 17, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council this 10th day of July, 2012. /s/ Mark Hanus Mayor Mark Hanus /s/ Bonnie Ritter Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -2411- �34411�;� CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) VG'q' /VL 4.I 1, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and the Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1. As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which the attached and forgoing extract was transcribed. v 2. 1 have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. 1 find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held of the date indicted in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 01 -78 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED 2-CAR GARAGE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2928 TUXEDO BLVD., P & Z CASE #01 -36 PID #19- 117 -23-31 -0077 Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on September 25, 2001. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 26 day of September, 2001. Acting City Clerk -2412- i► G1 N • r� CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 01 -78 • C7 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED 2 -CAR GARAGE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2928 TUXEDO BLVD., PBZ CASE #01 -36 PID # 19- 117 -23 -31 -0077 WHEREAS, the applicant, Stephen Hudak has requested a variance to construct a 2 -car garage in the northwest corner of the property located at 2928 Tuxedo Blvd., which would be located within the front yard setback area. The requested variance is as follows: Existin Side yard 30 feet Proposed 20 feet Reauired 30 feet . . Variance 10 feet WHEREAS, the subject property includes a one -story single family home; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to construct a new 24' x 24' detached garage in the northwest corner of the subject property to provide for all- weather storage of his personal vehicles and equipment; and WHEREAS, the subject property presently lacks either an attached or detached garage; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in a R -1 Zoning District which requires a (30) foot front yard setback for principal and detached accessory structures; and -2413- Resolution No. 01 -76 • WHEREAS, a portion of the property located in the southwest corner was taken by eminent domain for right -of -way purposes a number of years ago; and WHEREAS, due to the existing topography, the placement of any proposed new structure on the south side of the existing house will obstruct natural drainage flow and could create water run -off problems for both the subject site as well as for neighboring properties; and WHEREAS, the placement of a detached garage in the northwest comer of the subject site will be buffered by an existing hedge and/or natural vegetation; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and - recommended approval of the variance as recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby grant the variance as requested with the following condition: a) The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the variance application. • .�_ o - 2. This variance is approved for the following legally described property 0 as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Lots 46 4-- 1 2r i 17, Avalon, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Brown and seconded by Councilmember Hanus. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Anderson and Meyer. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: None. Adopted September 25, 2001 /" / Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: City Clerk -2414- Engineering • Planning • Surveying • RA M Frank Roos ,sociates, Inc. MEMORANDUM DATE: September 11, 2001 TO: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director FROM: John Cameron, City Engineer SUBJECT: City of Mound Hudak Variance Case #01 -36 MFRA #13467 As you are aware, a site visit was made to subject property on September 11, 2001. We reviewed the proposed garage location as well as an alternate site southwest of the house. The alternate site presents a huge problem with drainage as stated by the applicant. Most of the run off from this property and some from the neighbors to the east is directed to a swale that drains through this area and then across the adjacent property. To construct a garage southwest of the house would adversely affect the drainage and therefore I cannot support this area as an alternate garage site. The garage location as originally proposed, even with a setback variance, appears to be the best location on this property. cc: Jon Sutherland, Building Official, City of Mound sAmainAmou 13467 \correspondence\smith9 -11 15050 23rd Avenue North • Plymouth, Minnesota • 55447 _2415_ phone 7631476 -6010 • fax7631476 -8532 e -mail: mfra@mfra.com CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- • RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR MISCELLANEOUS PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS AND CERTIFYING TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST LEVY #18263 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the following miscellaneous charges: PID Number Amount Reason 14- 117- 24 -31- 0020 $42.75 Mowing on 8/29/11 13- 117 -24-44 -0024 $187.50 Mowing and brush removal on 9/2/11 13- 117 -24 -23 -0049 $160.31 Mowing on 8/17/11 23- 117 -24-43 -0017 $106.88 Mowing on 8/19/11 25- 117 -24 -11 -0147 $320.64 Mowing on 7/2/12, 8/17/11, and 5/31/12 13- 117 -24 -12 -0221 $160.31 Mowing on 9/7/11 19- 117 -23 -31 -0086 $96.19 Mowing on 9/24/11 14- 117 -24 -33 -0065 $106.88 Mowing on 5/31/12 24- 117 -24-41 -0199 $106.88 Mowing on 5/31/12 23- 117 -24-42 -0006 $53.44 Mowing on 7/13/12 13- 117 -24 -43 -0003 $106.88 Mowing on 7/12/12 30- 117 -23 -21 -0010 $181.69 Mowing on 7/2/12 24- 117 -24 -41 -0063 $106.88 Mowing on 8/6/12 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: • 1. Such proposed is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named above, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in one installment and shall bear interest at the rate of six (6) percent, to be collectable in 2013. To the assessment shall be added interest from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2013. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 23 t day of October, 2012. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -2416- Executive Summary C TO: Mound City Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 17, 2012 0 )TARS SUBJECT: 12-16,12-18, and 12 -19, Anderson Grove at Idlewood Subdvision Request REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Synergy Land Company, LLC, has requested on behalf of his client the subdivision of the 1.87 acre property at 5938 Idlewood Road into four (4) lots. The major subdivision request includes the preliminary plat, final plat and variance. All of the lots will be accessed from Idlewood Road. Three of the lots meet the minimum zoning requirements for the R -1 zoning district. The fourth lot, which is a flag lot, meets all • zoning requirements except for the amount of frontage on a public street and lot width. The applicant has proposed this arrangement based on feedback received from the Planning Commission and City Council during the sketch plan review process. PUBLIC HEARING According to City Code, the City Council is required to hold a public hearing as part of its consideration of the preliminary plat. All necessary public hearing notices have been published, noticed and mailed in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes and City Code. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their October 2, 2012 and October 16, 2012 meetings. Due to a publishing error, the public hearing was opened on October 2, 2012 and continued to the October 16, 2012 meeting. As summarized in the attached minute excerpts, the Planning Commission only had one citizen comment on the proposed subdivision. The individual lived to the west of the proposed subdivision and expressed a desire to see the wetland located on the north and west edges of the property protected. As noted at the October 2, 2012 meeting, a wetland buffer is required for the subdivision, in accordance with MCWD rules, and is being provided. The main focus of discussion was on the installation of utility connections to the lots. Currently there are utility connections available to the property lines for lots 2 and 4. • There are two sewer connections to lot 3 but no water service. Lot 1 is in need of both 1: 7 - Tbird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (6'T2 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 water and sewer utility connections. The applicant has requested that for efficiency, • they would prefer utility connections be installed by future buyers rather than as a part of the subdivision process. According to Article IV — Required Improvements of the Subdivision Ordinance (Sections 121 -143 to 121 -150), the developer is required to install the utility connections to the property line or provide an acceptable financial guarantee. Staff recommends that the code be enforced so as to ensure that the lots are prepared for future buyers. After their review and discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance, preliminary plat and final plat as recommended by Staff. The recommendation for the preliminary plat was unanimous while the variance and final plat recommendations were moved forward on an 8 to 1 vote. The only change to the conditions recommended by Staff was requested by the applicant in order to clarify the types of financial guarantees the City would accept. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the requests, Staff has prepared the attached resolutions for your consideration. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions with their findings of fact and conditions. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION At the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant noted that they would like to use • the second existing sewer connection in front of lot 3 to serve lot 1. This would involve angling the sewer connection to reach lot 1. Following the 10/16 meeting, Staff reviewed the proposal for lot 1 with the Public Works Director who deemed it to acceptable. The applicant has extended the utility easement in that area of lot 3 and provided a revised preliminary plat and final plat (attached) to accommodate this proposed sewer alignment. • 12418 -Third street, suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 U NOTICE OF MOUND CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT -MAJOR SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED 4-LOT SINGLE - FAMILY SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5938 IDLEWOOD ROAD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mound City Council, at a regular meeting to be held in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:OOPM, or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, October 23, 2012, will hold a public hearing to consider a preliminary plat -major subdivision application from Synergy Land Company LLC for a proposed 4 -lot, single - family subdivision of the property located at 5938 Idlewood Road (PID No. 23- 117 - 24-42- 0102). In addition to the public hearing for the preliminary plat, review of a variance application and the proposed final plat ("Anderson Grove at Idlewood') will be also reviewed and discussed. Copies of the applications and related information about the proposed project is . available for viewing at City Hall during regular office hours or by appointment. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting By: Jill Norlander Planning and Building Inspections Published in the Laker on October 13, 2012 • -2419- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO 12- RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE FOR THE ANDERSON GROVE AT IDLEWOOD SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, the applicant, Synergy Land Company, LLC, has submitted a variance request concurrently with its Anderson Grove at Idlewood plat to allow the creation of a flag lot that does not meet lot width and lot frontage requirements; and WHEREAS, the subject site has a PID # of 23- 117 -24 -42 -0102 and is located between Idlewood Road and Fairfield Road near Hawthorne Road; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to subdivide the 1.87 acre property into four (4) lots; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential and is proposed to have the following dimensions ; and WHEREAS, Lots 2, 3 and 4 will meet the minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 does not meet the minimum lot width and lot frontage requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, there are limited alternative lot arrangements for the subdivision given the parcel's size, the presence of a wetland on the north and west lot lines and location adjacent to undeveloped rights -of -way; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the variance application at its October 2, 2012 and October 16, 2012 meetings; and WHEREAS, after its review the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the variance request subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the variance request at its October 23, 2012 meeting; and • • C7 -2420- Required Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 47,102 sq. ft. 11,543 sq. ft. 11,550 sq. ft. 11,400 sq. ft. Lot Width/ Frontage 60 feet 20 feet 76.5 feet 77 feet 76 feet Lot Depth 80 feet 210 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet ; and WHEREAS, Lots 2, 3 and 4 will meet the minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 does not meet the minimum lot width and lot frontage requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, there are limited alternative lot arrangements for the subdivision given the parcel's size, the presence of a wetland on the north and west lot lines and location adjacent to undeveloped rights -of -way; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the variance application at its October 2, 2012 and October 16, 2012 meetings; and WHEREAS, after its review the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the variance request subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the variance request at its October 23, 2012 meeting; and • • C7 -2420- Resolution No. 12- • WHEREAS, the City has considered how the proposed project might affect public health, safety, or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance for Lot 1, Block 1 of the Anderson Grove at Idlewood subdivision based on the following findings of fact: a. Criteria contained in Sec. 129 -39 (a) of the City Code are met. b. The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties because: i. It is reasonable that the applicant may wish to subdivide the 1.87 acre property ii. The circumstances are unique to the property given its shape, the presence of a wetland on the north and west sides, and the unimproved nature of surrounding right -of -ways. iii. The creation of a flag lot will not alter the essential residential • nature of the surrounding neighborhood. c. The variance requested is the minimum needed to construct a driveway to Lot 1. This will minimize the visual impact of the flag lot and ensure the maximum lot frontage for the other three lots in the subdivision d. The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties because the shape of the lot, presence of a wetland and location of improved rights -of -way limits the subdivision of this property into four lots in another configuration. Alternative configurations would result in the other three lots to be oddly shaped and possibly difficult to develop. e. The creation of four lots and the use of a flag lot meets the low density residential designation in the Comprehensive Plan and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. f. The development of single - family residential homes for this property is intended by the zoning ordinance. g. Granting the requested variance will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other owners in the same zoning district and it will not be materially detrimental to property within the same zoning district. • -2421- Resolution No. 12- 2. The variance for Lot 1, Block 1 of the Anderson Grove at Idlewood subdivision is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of the preliminary plat and final plat applications concurrently submitted by the applicant for the same property. b. Payment of all related costs for the review of the variance application. c. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 3. The variance is approved for the following legally described property: Lot 1, Block 1, Anderson Grove at Idlewood Adopted by the City Council this 23 day of October, 2012. Mark Hanus, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • • • -2422- • CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLAT /MAJOR SUBDIVISION OF ANDERSON GROVE AT IDLEWOOD SUBDIVISION • WHEREAS, the applicant, Synergy Land Company, LLC, has submitted a preliminary plat application to plat the proposed Anderson Grove at Idlewood subdivision; and WHEREAS, the subject site has a PID # of 23- 117 -24 -42 -0102 and is located between Idlewood Road and Fairfield Road near Hawthorne Road; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to subdivide the 1.87 acre property into four (4) lots; and WHEREAS, the proposed use of the property for single family homes is consistent with the guidance of Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential and is proposed to have the following dimensions ; and WHEREAS, Lots 2, 3 and 4 will meet the minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 does not meet the minimum lot width and lot frontage requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has concurrently applied for a variance to address the deficiencies of Lot 1; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested to pay fees in lieu of parkland dedication; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission opened a public hearing at its October 2, 2012 meeting and continued the public hearing to its October 16, 2012 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed Anderson Grove at Idlewood major subdivision; and WHEREAS, after its review the Planning Commission recommended the City Council • approve the preliminary plat request subject to conditions; and -2423- Required Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 47,102 sq. ft. 11,543 sq. ft. 11,550 sq. ft. 11,400 sq. ft. Lot Width/ Frontage 60 feet 20 feet 76.5 feet 77 feet 76 feet Lot Depth 80 feet 210 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet ; and WHEREAS, Lots 2, 3 and 4 will meet the minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 does not meet the minimum lot width and lot frontage requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has concurrently applied for a variance to address the deficiencies of Lot 1; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested to pay fees in lieu of parkland dedication; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission opened a public hearing at its October 2, 2012 meeting and continued the public hearing to its October 16, 2012 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed Anderson Grove at Idlewood major subdivision; and WHEREAS, after its review the Planning Commission recommended the City Council • approve the preliminary plat request subject to conditions; and -2423- Resolution No. 12- WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its October 23, 2012 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed Anderson Grove at Idlewood major • subdivision; and WHEREAS, the City has considered how the proposed project might affect public health, safety, or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the preliminary plat and development plan, taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances, and other official controls. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the preliminary plat in accordance with Sec. 121 -61 et seq of the City Code based on the following findings of fact: a. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Mound. b. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. c. The proposed development has adequately addressed the potential • environmental impact of the subdivision. d. The proposed development has sufficiently considered traffic impacts of the subdivision. e. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. f. The preliminary plat drawing labeled as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated into this Resolution and all improvements shall be as shown on the plans or as modified under the approval of the City. 2. The preliminary plat is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. The approval of the variance application concurrently submitted by the applicant for the same property. b. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. • -2424- Resolution No. 12- • c. The applicant shall record the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Manager shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the applicant and City Officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462 and the City of Mound Code of Ordinances. Adopted by the City Council this 23 day of October, 2012. Mark Hanus, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • is -2425- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 12- RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT /MAJOR SUBDIVISION OF ANDERSON GROVE AT IDLEWOOD SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, the applicant, Synergy Land Company, LLC, has submitted a final plat application to plat the proposed Anderson Grove at Idlewood subdivision; and WHEREAS, the subject site has a PID # of 23- 117 - 24-42 -0102 and is located between Idlewood Road and Fairfield Road near Hawthorne Road; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to subdivide the 1.87 acre property into four (4) lots; and WHEREAS, the proposed use of the property for single family homes is consistent with the guidance of Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential and is proposed to have the following dimensions ; and WHEREAS, Lots 2, 3 and 4 will meet the minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 does not meet the minimum lot width and lot frontage requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has concurrently applied for a variance to address the deficiencies of Lot 1; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested to pay fees in lieu of parkland dedication; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the final plat application at its October 2, 2012 and October 16, 2012 meetings; and WHEREAS, after its review the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the final plat request subject to conditions; and • WHEREAS, the City Council considered the final plat request at its October 23, 2012 • meeting; and -2426- Required Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 47,102 sq. ft. 11,543 sq. ft. 11,550 sq. ft. 11,400 sq. ft. Lot Width/ Frontage 60 feet 20 feet 76.5 feet 77 feet 76 feet Lot Depth 80 feet 1 210 feet 1 150 feet 1 150 feet 150 feet ; and WHEREAS, Lots 2, 3 and 4 will meet the minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, Lot 1 does not meet the minimum lot width and lot frontage requirements of the R -1 Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has concurrently applied for a variance to address the deficiencies of Lot 1; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested to pay fees in lieu of parkland dedication; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the final plat application at its October 2, 2012 and October 16, 2012 meetings; and WHEREAS, after its review the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the final plat request subject to conditions; and • WHEREAS, the City Council considered the final plat request at its October 23, 2012 • meeting; and -2426- Resolution No. 12- . WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the final plat taking into consideration the requirements of the City, giving particular attention to the lot arrangement, water supply, sewer disposal, drainage and the present development of adjoining lands and the requirements of other official controls; and WHEREAS, said final plat is in all respects consistent with the preliminary plat, and the regulations and the requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the City Code of Ordinances of the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the final plat in accordance with Sec. 121 -87 et seq of the City Code based on the following findings of fact: a. The proposed final plat is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. b. The proposed final plat is in all respects consistent with the preliminary plat. c.. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. d. The final plat drawing labeled as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated into • this Resolution and all improvements shall be as shown on the plans or as modified under the approval of the City. 2. The final plat is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of the preliminary plat and variance applications concurrently submitted. b. The applicant shall meet the conditions set forth in the plat opinion received from the City Attorney and any subsequent supplemental opinions. c. Payment of park dedication fees in the amount of $8,700.00 prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording. d. Drainage and utility easements, as required by the City Engineer, shall be provided and shown on the final plat. e. As applicable, payment of all required utility fees at the current approved rates prior to release of the resolution. f. The utilities that serve the original house shall be disconnected or abandoned in accordance with City standards prior to the release of the final plat. Alternatively, the applicant may submit an agreement with a financial guarantee in a form acceptable to the City Attorney in the amount of 125% of a contractor's estimate(s) deemed acceptable by the Public Works Director or designee. s -2427- Resolution No. 12- g. As applicable, the installation of new water and sewer services must be completed prior to release of the Resolution. Alternatively, prior to • the release of the Resolution for recording the applicant may submit a financial guarantee to cover the cost of utility service connection that is in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. The financial guarantee must be in the amount of 125% of a contractor(s) estimate deemed acceptable by the Public Works Director or designee. h. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction including but not limited to installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be replaced by the Public Works Director or designee. i. Applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the final plat application. j. The applicant shall record the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the final plat for recording shall be deemed as conclusive evidence that conditions have been met. k. All future building permit applicants for the new lots shall be responsible for the procurement of any and /or all required local or agency permitting, including, but not limited to, a demolition permit, building permits, and all required Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit(s) including and conditions and /or requirements. The City will withhold building permit issuance or other approvals until all • required agency permits have been approved and evidence of permit issuance has been provided to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Manager shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the applicant and City Officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462 and the City of Mound Code of Ordinances. Adopted by the City Council this 23r day of October, 2012. Mark Hanus, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk • -2428- 0 0 0 mz �m mmz Z n G) ri+iv�pm {•� 0 CPC l n a h �aL �mp la P � r . 0 c z v Z D v X O z 0 X ` O D v O v o m r W � Z T TI N m 0 1 N O C A l r I L $ J I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I N I 50 I 01 I I I I -------- - - - - - - -� I I I N I I is I I i o0 I --A I €; I I Z. I I N I m I w I I I I -- --- - - - - -- ma 1 a IW est 9 °e °f the F.et 210 feet of the I N$ I of Lot 59. Mud @are Subdivision No. N WET LAND -" "` S00'57'33"W 150.00 ' - SO "W ----------- WI � N N .. � � I —------ - - "{ — I L--- -_� - -_ - --J I I to N r - - - -- 1 58 90 - - -- I - - � II A . - - -- -- — � — L ` cli / 1 II ��RtiF i__ e° --- - -- e 3 0 I I _ I - I N00 "E 210. 1 I L - S J - - - - - - -- �-� — — 18 10 "E EJ50.00 Fo s '�•w :•I �# aD j BLOCK 7 - - - -- - -- ------- - - - - - : LEACH LANE - - - -- F -- ---- - - - - - —T I I I I I I C0 I A I O I i (_n I I 1rjj Si o �S ;F S •� S o 0 �g Z • W..t 480 fat of SubdkgW- No. 188 KIPLING LANE S I i r- - - - - -- - - -- -- 24 t 1 I 4 rn I 1 i o 00 r I I I I r k `° - - - < � A 0, I Z r-J I O I _ _ 0 I eN7 • • n / W / r O I - - - -- P N __ / s_ �s - �l_ 1 v -__ EAp0yy D I I 0 I 24 a - - - -- LANE _ - BLOCK 6 - --� �o a» g w i� � g d n nn: 01 0 0 s �» 'O C N N n S� $ � a = s 09 °s n m Aga I m � Cf " zo — ' pmm90,0 ^ yy win C m in G] 0a� LS p L3:Z N2 _ 3 d 0 O FC1 x�z 0 0 $nN o 25 °g3 » Ocmm Op s OMom8Omtn O °o r -. 3 m mm m M, -Io O $ < $ U ;�N�O m �Z m F r m 1rjj Si o �S ;F S •� S o 0 �g Z • W..t 480 fat of SubdkgW- No. 188 KIPLING LANE S I i r- - - - - -- - - -- -- 24 t 1 I 4 rn I 1 i o 00 r I I I I r k `° - - - < � A 0, I Z r-J I O I _ _ 0 I O • n / W / r O I - - - -- P N __ / s_ �s - �l_ 1 v -__ EAp0yy D I I 0 I 24 a - - - -- LANE _ - BLOCK 6 - --� i 3 3 � �o�oo�a < � A 0, o z 0 • _ G oz o m n O �o a» g w i� � g > D 11 • 0 0 s �» 'O C N N n C° O $ � a = s 09 °s n m w • A 0 0 » s m F r m a • m o Z g o g ° z 0 Q E+ a A O O a A W O T � V z O w A s y X s K g F, 0 d 0 it 2. a 3 p i s 0 gt E • S � o _r o � N ° S EO 0 1H s VL �ao S�3 L 8 a o = E 0 s <� 0 . o $ N Zm FA i I 3�y7 M - Z s Y � •. -..1_ J d / / 1 1 W s v I g � � s X'' g d II � S • c 4 4 o a � x s m d W o Q s� m � • € o e s 4 's s y X s K g F, 0 d 0 it 2. a 3 p i s 0 gt E • S � o _r o � N ° S EO 0 1H s VL �ao S�3 L 8 a o = E 0 s <� 0 . o $ N Zm FA i I 3�y7 M - Z s Y � •. -..1_ J d / / 1 1 W 3 � '1�+ -A v S o a E 1 ct i a 1 � L'� I I 1 ' 1 -- L A0018 _ i - -- - - - --- - y 10013 SAVA" ------- - - -°-� -- co —I _ — OD — J COYI I 3AI,91�IOM 'i i I I F --- --C- - - ---1 I N I 0 J I L ------- - - --s� o 0 wait X.OwAkm 0 "'N N 1 ,w�1y 1 T Ip► OM.YtO+T +�3�p WN I —� N — O U i F N sl N I /�j BSI CJ I I N 1 1 s 8 x 0 Y d N s 8 cg E R r 0 v � B r ID s Z � � Z a Oi I c d i N OL 1 I 1 01 P I s� 1 �O I I o� - - - - - -- � al Q V 0 Q s 3 (— (P�MIW ww9 klww� I � E a o I g N z I fl o I all 0 g :I 1 j •. C U i -- 1 1 i I 8 � 1 � 1 < I 1 1 I v 1 ° 1 s I I ct i a 1 � L'� I I 1 ' 1 -- L A0018 _ i - -- - - - --- - y 10013 SAVA" ------- - - -°-� -- co —I _ — OD — J COYI I 3AI,91�IOM 'i i I I F --- --C- - - ---1 I N I 0 J I L ------- - - --s� o 0 wait X.OwAkm 0 "'N N 1 ,w�1y 1 T Ip► OM.YtO+T +�3�p WN I —� N — O U i F N sl N I /�j BSI CJ I I N 1 1 s 8 x 0 Y d N s 8 cg E R r 0 v � B r ID s Z � � Z a Oi I c d i N OL 1 I 1 01 P I s� 1 �O I I o� - - - - - -- � al Q V 0 Q s 3 (— (P�MIW ww9 klww� I � E a o I g N z I fl o I all 0 g :I 1 j •. C U i -- 1 1 i I 8 � 1 � 1 < I 1 1 I v 1 ° 1 s I I s 8 x 0 Y d N s 8 cg E R r 0 v � B r ID s Z � � Z a Oi I c d i N OL 1 I 1 01 P I s� 1 �O I I o� - - - - - -- � al Q V 0 Q s 3 (— (P�MIW ww9 klww� I � E a o I g N z I fl o I all 0 g :I 1 j •. C U i -- 1 1 i I 8 � 1 � 1 < I 1 1 I v 1 ° 1 s I I 0 • MINUTE EXCERPT MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 16, 2012 ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert, Jeffrey Bergquist and Councilmember Ray Salazar. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Planning Commission Secretary Jill Norlander, Planning Consult Rita Trapp from HKGi. Others present: Steve Hudak, 2928 Tuxedo Blvd; Brent BOARD OF APPEALS Public Hearing — "Anderson Grove at Idles PC Case No. 12-16 Preliminary Plat -Major PC Case No. 12 -18 Variance PC Case No. 12 -19 Final Plat Location: 5938 Idlewood Road Chair Ward re- opened the public Trapp reviewed the and the proposal fo subdivision as props Brent Hiss They v commenced impacting Oi 2nd sanitary connection i nued from ergy Land Company 2nd meeting) Land Company ing water and sewer services commends approval of the end to disconnect the services to Lot 1. finance of the new connections. He trunk lines are in the street and that this plat is not o avoid going into the street by requesting use of the F f 1. They also request that the 2 remaining water the building permits. Smith stated that the in to atm of water and sewer connections is required by the code for subdivisions and protects' re buyers. The applicant is asking for a waiver of that requirement which is a policy decision for the Council. MOTION by Linkert, second by Gawtry, to close the public hearing. MOTION carried unanimously. Discussion Retterath was supportive of staff insisting the utilities be connected as required by code. The use of the extra sanitary connection by lot 2 is reasonable. -2431- Goode asked what the "normal" process for water /sewer connections. Smith responded that both utilities installation and submittal of financial security are done with subdivisions. MOTION by Ward, second by Salazar, to approve the variance with conditions as submitted by staff. MOTION carried. Voting for: Ward, Bergquist, Gawtry, Goode, Linkert, Penner, Retterath, Wiechert, Salazar; Voting against: Bergquist MOTION by Ward, second by Salazar, to approve the preliminary plat with conditions as submitted by staff. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Ward, second by Penner, to approve the final staff making the financial guarantee in item 6 to be the Voting for: Ward, Bergquist, Gawtry, Goode, Linkert, Voting against: Bergquist ° fth conditions as submitted by s in item 7. MOTION carried. ierath, Wiechert, Salazar; • • • -2432- PLANNING REPORT m0wo © Y ARw TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: October 11, 2012 MEETING DATE: October 16, 2012 APPLICANT: Brent Hislop, representative for Anderson Estate REQUEST: Major Subdivision — preliminary plat, final plat and variance CASE NUMBERS: 12-16,12-18,12-19 LOCATION: 5938 Idlewood Road PROPERTY ID: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0102 ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential • This application was initially presented at the October 2, 2012, Planning Commission Meeting. Due to an error in publishing of the public hearing notice for that meeting, the public hearing was opened on October 2nd and continued to the upcoming October 16th Planning Commission Special Meeting. Planning Commissioners are requested to bring their October 2nd Planning Report for this item to the meeting as the subsequent information will be supplemental to the last planning report. A copy of the October 2nd Planning Report is available to the public to supplement this report. REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant has requested, on behalf of his clients, the subdivision of the 1.9 acre property at 5938 Idlewood Road into four (4) lots. The major subdivision request includes the preliminary plat, final plat and variance. All of the lots will be accessed from Idlewood Road. Three of the lots meet the minimum zoning requirements for the R -1 zoning district. The fourth lot, which is a flag lot, meets all zoning requirements except for the amount of frontage on a public street and lot width. PUBLIC NOTICE As previously mentioned there was an error in the publishing of the public hearing notice for the October 2, 2012 meeting. This resulted in the public hearing to be opened on October 2 and continued to the October 16 Special Meeting. A public hearing notice for the October 16 special meeting was published on October 6, 2012. • 123 Wc-2433 -I Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p• 2 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision October 12, 2012 UTILITY ANALYSIS • Staff has continued to review the proposed utilities for the site since the October 2, 2012 meeting. The preliminary plat indicates that water and sewer connections are available for lots 2 and 4. There are also two sewer connections for lot 3. There are no utilities available for lot 1 at this time and lot 3 is lacking a water connection. It is also important to note that one of the existing water or sewer service connections shown may be the existing service for the lot. Those existing services will need to be abandoned and examined to determine whether they can be reused. This may result in additional water or sewer services needed. As noted at the October 2" meeting, the applicant has requested that the utilities be installed by the future buyers rather than as part of the development process. According to the Subdivision Ordinance, Article IV — Required Improvements (Section 121 -143 to 121 -150), the developer is required to install the sewer and water services to the property line or provide a financial guarantee equal to 125% of the cost. While utility connections exist for some lots of the development, they do not exist for all lots. Staff recommends that a condition of approval be that the remaining services connections be installed as required by City Code. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As requested at the October 2 nd Planning Commission meeting, Staff has inquired with • the Fire Department in regard to the adoption of the fire code. Section 30 -46 of the City Code is where the City has adopted the Minnesota State Fire Code as the fire code for the City. Staff has also discussed how the future lots to the east of this subdivision will be provided utilities. As noted at the end of the October 2 nd Planning Commission meeting, there are utilities in the Fairfield Road right -of -way to the Leach Lane right -of -way. The lots to the east are intended to be served from these utilities rather than from Idlewood Road. Thus, there is not a need for an expanded utility easement as part of this subdivision. The removal of the existing gravel driveway on proposed lot 3 was previously included as a condition for approval of the final plat. On the basis that the existing driveway could be used as possible alternate construction access for proposed lot 1, with appropriate approval by owner(s), and that removal would be accommodated as part of a future building permit, Staff has removed this item from the list of recommended conditions. • 123 N(- 2434 -i Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 3 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision • October 12, 2012 STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) Preliminary Plat for Major Subdivision Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Anderson Grove at Idlewood preliminary plat as submitted with the following conditions: 1. The approval of the variance application concurrently submitted by the applicant. 2. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. 3. The applicant shall record the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. 4. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the preliminary plat application is approved. Variance • Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the variance application as submitted with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the preliminary plat and final applications concurrently submitted by the applicant. 2. Payment of all related costs for the review of the variance application. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. In recommending approval of the requested variance, the following findings of fact are suggested: 1. The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties because: a. It is reasonable that the applicant may wish to subdivide the.1.87 acre property b. The circumstances are unique to the property given its shape, the presence of a wetland on the north and west sides, and the unimproved nature of surrounding right -of -ways. c. The creation of a flag lot will not alter the essential residential nature of the • surrounding neighborhood. 123 N- 2435 -of Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 4 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision October 12, 2012 2. The variance requested is the minimum needed to construct a driveway to Lot 1. • This will minimize the visual impact of the flag lot and ensure the maximum lot frontage for the other three lots in the subdivision. 3. The shape of the lot, presence of a wetland and location of improved rights -of- way limits the subdivision of this property into four lots in another configuration. Alternative configurations would result in the other three lots to be oddly shaped and possibly difficult to develop. 4. The creation of four lots and the use of a flag lot meets the low density residential designation in the Comprehensive Plan and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. 4. The development of single- family residential homes for this property is intended by the zoning ordinance. 5. Granting the requested variance will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other owners in the same zoning district and it will not be materially detrimental to property within the same zoning district. Final Plat for Major Subdivision Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Anderson Grove at Idlewood final plat as submitted with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the preliminary plat and variance applications concurrently submitted. • 2. The applicant shall meet the conditions set forth in the plat opinion received from the City Attorney and any subsequent supplemental opinions. 3. Payment of park dedication fees in the amount of $8,700.00 prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording. 4. Drainage and utility easements, as required by the City Engineer, shall be provided and shown on the final plat. 5. As applicable, payment of all required utility fees at the current approved rates prior to release of the resolution. 6. The utilities that serve the original house shall be disconnected and abandoned prior to the release of the final plat or the submittal of an agreement, to be prepared by the City Attorney, and a cash escrow in the amount of 125% of a contractor's estimate(s) which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director or designee. 7. Prior to the release of the Resolution for recording, new water and sewer services must be installed to the property line so each lot is satisfactorily served, or some type of acceptable financial guarantee provided, such as a cash deposit, letter of credit or performance bond, to cover the cost of utility service connections. 8. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction including but not limited to installation of the water service, sewer service and • 123 N- 2436? Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 5 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision October 12, 2012 • small utilities, shall be replaced. 9. Applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the final plat application. 10. The applicant shall record the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the final plat for recording shall be deemed as conclusive evidence that conditions have been met. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all required local or agency permitting, including, but not limited to, a demolition permit, building permit, and all required Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit(s). CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE The preliminary plat, including the recommendations from the Planning Commission, will be presented at an upcoming City Council public hearing. At this time, the tentative date for the City Council public hearing is Tuesday, October 23, 2012 but is subject to change. • • 123 N 2437 d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 2, 2012 ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert, and Councilmember Ray Salazar. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist and Douglas Gawtry. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Planning Commission Secretary Jill Norlander, Planning Consul t Rita Trapp from HKGi. Others present: Ray Lorimor, 1909 Shorewood La; Rick 1909 Shoreline La; Victoria & Caleb Brickley, 2954 Oa Rd, Mtka. BOARD OF APPEALS Public Hearing — "Anderson Grove at Idlewood" PC Case No. 12-16 Preliminary PlatIfAlLor Subdivision, PC Case No. 12-18 Variance PC Case No. 12 -19 Final Plat Location: 5938 Idlewood Road Chair Ward opened the project request. icatio nearly 100 years old. B e remain o enAmtd,Octobe Commis oerr eir r Lot 1 is pfed as a "flag" E the minimutn equirements bf' supported by t4wcode, addres? Road that utilizedlic right c Fire access issues of the drew Lots 2, 3 and 4 meet all of strict. The flag lot design, though not generally of the driveway previously planned from Fairfield to Lot 1 are resolved because the driveway is completely on private property and serves otnly one residence. Establishment of utilities for the parcels will be brought forward at the next meeting after engineer's review. All wetland permitting will be under the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules. While the Planning Commission is not making a recommendation until October 16 Staff did share that they will be recommending approval of the plat and requested variance with normal conditions. Linkert felt an opportunity to improve the surrounding neighborhood is being missed, i.e. the Fairfield Road area. 1680 Dove La; Rachel Timp, Aary Quast, 2602 Cedar Crest ip, Synergy Land Company n lanner Rita Trapp introduced is_ pla ng into 4 lots. Existing home is not get properly published the hearing will firing will conclude and the Planning 0 • • -2438- • Salazar reasoned that, the area wasn't being addressed because it was above and beyond the scope for this applicant at this time. Retterath asked if the City was required, by code, to construct a roadway to land locked parcels. Trapp answered no. He then wanted to know how to prevent parcels being boxed in. Trapp indicated that it was difficult since there are multiple owners and they would need to work together to resolve the issue of access. Retterath was glad to see the 20 foot access to Idlewood to ac�mmodate a driveway, especially considering snow load. Brent Hislop (Synergy Land Company) stated that the eg the existing house are being RA disconnected. Re- installation of the utilities will b Pew o~ responsibility and is part of the existing purchase agreement. How the are tied in w(j }be established once they meet with the engineer. Salazar questioned if the new driveway will be in d bet lots 3 anti 4;y the seller. Mr. Hislop indicated the lot was being sold "as is" and th I I li ty for installation of the driveway will be on the new owners. Marty Campion (Campion Engineering Services) said that the r and water main lines are in • the street and several services are in. Details will be discussed he City Engineer. Victoria Brickley (2954 Oaklawn La) is concerned with maintaining the wetland. Ward assured her that we take wetland preservation very seriously. Linkert reiterated his desire to look at the bigger picture for the area (i.e. access to Highland Park.). Rettherath suggested taking a look how the parcels to the east get utility access; opportunity for the Planning Commission to "plan" something as opposed to reacting to things brought forward. Linkert was frustrated by the restrictions established by the ordinances, particularly the fire code requirements on the driveway. Retterath agreed and suggested that the ordinances should be questioned if it prevents applicants and the City from doing reasonable developments. Staff reminded them that the driveway requirement is a fire code issue and may not be negotiable. • MOTION by Ward, second by Salazar, to continue the Public Hearing of preliminary plat- major subdivision for "Anderson Grove at Idlewood" to the October 16 special meting at which time we will consider the variance and final plat. MOTION carried unanimously. -2439- PLANNING REPORT NIN . TO: Mound Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 27, 2012 MEETING DATE: October 2, 2012 APPLICANT: Brent Hislop, representative for Anderson Estate REQUEST: Major Subdivision — preliminary plat, final plat and variance CASE NUMBERS: 12-16,12-18,12-19 LOCATION: 5938 Idlewood Road PROPERTY ID: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0102 ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND • The applicant has requested, on behalf of his clients, the subdivision of the property at 5938 Idlewood Road into four (4) lots. The major subdivision request includes the preliminary plat, final plat and variance. The property is located between Idlewood Road and Fairfield Road near Hawthorne Road. The Anderson family has lived on the 2.5 acre site for nearly 100 years. The proposed major subdivision would divide the 1.9 acre property into four lots, all of which will be accessed from Idlewood Road. Three of the lots meet the minimum zoning requirements for the R -1 zoning district. The fourth lot, which is a flag lot, meets all zoning requirements except for the amount of frontage on a public street and lot width. SUBDIVISION PROCESS The major subdivision process is a three step process involving sketch plan review, preliminary plat and final plat. The applicant came before the Planning Commission and City Council regarding this plat in July of 2012. The applicant has incorporated the input received in the sketch plan review process in the major subdivision application submitted. • 123 /Y-2440_d Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 2 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 C7 The applicant is now requesting preliminary plat and final plat review of the proposed subdivision. As required by City Code Section 121.61 (e), the Planning Commission must hold a public hearing on the proposed subdivision. Members are advised that the required Notice of Public Hearing was submitted to the Laker on September 19, 2012 for publication on Saturday, September 22, 2012 and was mailed to all property owners within 350 FT, according to Hennepin County tax records, on September 20, 2012. The notice was also posted on the City Hall bulletin board on September 19, 2012. Staff confirmed receipt and intent to publish with the Laker by telephone and email on September 19, 2012. However, Staff was notified on September 24, 2012 by the Laker that the public hearing notice was inadavertedly not published. So as to continue with the City's review of the submitted applications for the Anderson Grove at Idlewood project, the City Attorney has advised that the Planning Commission proceed with the scheduled October 2, 2012 public hearing. However, in order to meet the required publication requirements, the Planning Commission is advised that the public hearing is to remain open and continued to a special Planning Commission meeting that has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 16, 2012 at 7PM. Prior to that meeting, all required notification and /or publication requirements in accordance with statute and local ordinance will be undertaken. • REVIEW TIMELINES Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.358, local government agencies are required to approve or deny subdivision requests within 120 days. The major subdivision application (preliminary plat and final plat) and plan set was submitted on August 30, 2012 and deemed complete. Members are advised that the applicant submitted a revised plan set on September 25, 2012 which responded to Staff's request for some additional plat information to supplement the application(s). Minnesota State Statutes also requires local government agencies to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days unless an extension is executed. The variance application was received on September 4, 2012 and deemed complete. • 123 Nc- 2441? Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 3 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 SITE CONDITIONS The Anderson Estate is seeking to subdivide its 1.87 acre parcel fronting Idlewood Road into four lots. The site is extensively wooded. The original home, which is in a conforming location, is shown on proposed Lot 1, and is located at the high spot of the property. Based on information from the applicant, there is a purchase agreement for proposed Lot 1 and they intend to close in late October, subject to plat approval. The existing house, which is a deteriorating condition, is to be transferred as part of the future sale and the contracted buyer has indicated their intent to tear down the existing home and build a new home. However, the applicant has indicated that the timing of these plans will be at the new owner's discretion, subject to all applicable City regulations. The applicant has also indicated that the current driveway and utility connection for proposed Lot 1 are to be voided and replaced within the 20' drive access. A wetland delineation report was prepared by Arrowhead Environmental Consulting on behalf of the applicant. The wetland delineation report was sent to City Staff and all affected agencies for review. The report was used by the applicant to prepare the wetland buffer exhibit. The wetland delineation report found that there is one wetland basin within and adjacent to the parcel boundary. It is a Shrub- Carr /Coniferous Bog located on the northern and western portions of the property. Please refer to "Infrastructure Analysis" section later in this report for additional wetland information. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City's Comprehensive Plan guides this land for Low Density Residential, which allows single - family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. The plat proposes a total of four (4) single - family homes on 1.87 acres. This calculates to a density of 2.1 units per acre, so the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use guidance for density. ZONING The property is zoned R -1 Single Family Residential. The following table shows how the proposed project will conform to R -1 minimum requirements: Lots 2, 3 and 4 meet all minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Zoning District. As a flag lot, Lot 1 does not meet the lot width and lot frontage requirements for the R -1 Zoning District and will require a variance. • is is 123 NC-2442-'Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 Required Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 47,102 sq. ft. 11,543 sq. ft. 11,550 sq. ft. 11,400 sq. ft. Lot Width/ Frontage 60 feet 20 feet 76.5 feet 77 feet 76 feet Lot Depth 80 feet 210 feet 150 feet 150 feet 150 feet Lots 2, 3 and 4 meet all minimum zoning requirements of the R -1 Zoning District. As a flag lot, Lot 1 does not meet the lot width and lot frontage requirements for the R -1 Zoning District and will require a variance. • is is 123 NC-2442-'Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 4 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 • The applicant has proposed a flag lot in response to the feedback received during the sketch plan review process. As you may remember the applicant originally proposed accessing Lot 1 from the unimproved Fairfield Road to the east through a private driveway on a public right -of -way. Given the potential for future development in the area and concerns about private improvements on public right -of -way, it was recommended that the applicant consider the platting of a flag lot. There is insufficient space along Idlewood Road to create four reasonably sized and shaped lots that meet minimum lot frontage and width requirements. Thus, a variance request for a flag lot with a sufficiently wide access strip to the street to accommodate a private driveway is reasonable. Once subdivided, all four lots will have non lot of record status and will be subject to all of the setbacks required for the R -1 Single Family Residential Zoning District. Given the size and topography of these lots, it is anticipated that proposed homes should be able to be accommodated within the following required setback areas: • Front yard — 30 feet • Side yard —10 feet • Rear yard —15 feet • • Impervious surface coverage will be limited to 30% PARK LAND DEDICATION Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication will be required per City Code Section 121 -121. Given the project's location and size, Staff recommends that the park dedication be set based on a contribution of 10% of the estimated market value of the property rather than 10% of the property. City policy uses Hennepin County's estimated land market value for this determination. City policy also provides a credit for the existing home on the property. The value of the land for taxes payable in 2012 is $116,000. The recommended park dedication amount for the three new lots is $8,700.00. INFRASTRUCTURE ANALYSIS a) Streets. Access to all four properties is proposed off of Idlewood Road. The driveway for the flag lot 1 will be located between Lots 3 and 4 and located entirely on private property. Given that the private driveway will only serve the one property there are no fire code issues or requirements. No additional changes to Idlewood Road are proposed. • 123 Nc -2443 1 Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 5 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 b) Utilities. The properties will all have city water and sewer. Utilities for Lots 2, 3, and 4 will be extended from Idlewood Road. Utilities for Lot 1 will also be extended from the Idlewood right of way which is a change from the concept plan. Previously the utilities for Lot 1 were to be extended from unimproved Fairfield Lane. c) Stormwater. Effective September 1, 2011, water runoff and stormwater are under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, therefore these issues will need to be consistent with MCWD rules as well as any additional City regulation that may apply. The applicant has already been in contact with MCWD Staff about the necessary permits which will be required as part of the development. Permits required will include Erosion Control, Wetland Protection and Stormwater Management. • d) Wetlands. As noted previously there is a wetland on and adjacent to the property. The City of Mound is the Local Govemmental Unit (LGU) for the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) for determination of the wetland boundary. A wetland delineation report was submitted to the City on August 31, 2012. Mark Perry from Bolton & Menk, who is the City's wetland consultant, sent out the • notice for review of a wetland boundary in accordance with WCA regulations on September 5, 2012. The Notice of Decision was issued on September 27, 2012. No comments were received by the City (LGU). With the exception of the wetland boundary, all other regulatory and permitting authority for wetlands (MCWD Rule D) are the responsibility of the MCWD. Therefore, the wetland delineation report and buffer exhibit were also submitted to the MCWD for review. Based on information received from Steve Christopher of the MCWD by email on September 11, 2012, the proposed wetland buffer (37.5 feet) for the subdivision is consistent with their rules. Portions of the wetland delineation report including the summary have been included as an attachment. A full copy of the report will be provided upon request. • 123 No -2444- Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 6 Case #12- 16,12 -18, & 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 C7 • CITY DEPARTMENT AND AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the variance and subdivision applications and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments and involved public agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Carlton Moore, Public No additional comments as applicant responded to initial Works Director question about changes to utilities plan following concept plan. Note: Utilities for all four lots will be provided via the /dlewood right -of -way. Dan Faulkner, City Engineer Greg Pederson, Fire Chief Dean Mooney, Police Chief Jim Fackler, Public Works Supervisor No comments Based on discussion with the applicant, the 20' wide driveway is to service only Lot 1 and does not service any driveways or garages into Lots 3 and 4. Since the drive only services Lot 1, according to the fire code, it is not a fire access roadway and is simply a driveway servicing one house. The plan as proposed meets the requirements of the Minnesota Fire Code. No comments. No comments. Melissa Manderschied, Issues raised in the Plat Opinion Letter dated City Attorney September 14, 2012 from Corinne Heine of Kennedy and Graven will need to be satisfactorily addressed. Also, additional issues provided by email from Ms. Heine on September 27, 2012 which supplement the Plat Opinion Letter. "With respect to who must sign the plat, the plat must be signed by Mary R. Quast as personal representative of the Estate of Priscilla S. Anderson. Certified copies of the letters of administration must be provided at the time the plat is filed. The developer provided a copy of those letters which were issued in 2011. Those are old, and normally you want to have letters that have been certified as being in effect close to the date of the instrument of conveyance. Because a sale of the platted lot is expected to occur at or near the time of platting, 1 expect that the title company will require a new certified copy of the letters." 123 Nc 2445- Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 p. 7 Case #12- 16,12 -18, & 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 Applicant is also advised that other questions and matters may arise prior to the release of the final plat. Steve Christopher, MCWD Based on information provided by email on 9 -7 -2012, the District has already had pre - application discussions regarding the necessary permits that will be required from MCWD. They will include Erosion Control, Wetland Protection and Stormwater Management. The revised buffer provided is consistent with the District's Wetland Protection Rule. Please also refer to MCWD comments in `7nfrastrucuture Analysis" sections) earlier in this report. STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) is Preliminary Plat for Major Subdivision Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Anderson Grove at Idlewood preliminary plat as submitted with the following conditions: • 1. The approval of the variance application concurrently submitted by the applicant. 2. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. 3. The applicant shall record the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. 4. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the preliminary plat application is approved. is 123 N(- 2446 -I Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 P. 8 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& September 27, 2012 • Variance 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the variance application as submitted with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the preliminary plat and final applications concurrently submitted by the applicant. 2. Payment of all related costs for the review of the variance application. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. In recommending approval of the requested variance, the following findings of fact are suggested: 1. The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties because: a. It is reasonable that the applicant may wish to subdivide the 1.87 acre property is b. The circumstances are unique to the property given its shape, the presence of a wetland on the north and west sides, and the unimproved nature of surrounding right -of -ways. c. The creation of a flag lot will not alter the essential residential nature of the surrounding neighborhood. 2. The variance requested is the minimum needed to construct a driveway to Lot 1. This will minimize the visual impact of the flag lot and ensure the maximum lot frontage for the other three lots in the subdivision. 3. The shape of the lot, presence of a wetland and location of improved rights -of- way limits the subdivision of this property into four lots in another configuration. Alternative configurations would result in the other three lots to be oddly shaped and possibly difficult to develop. 4. The creation of four lots and the use of a flag lot meets the low density residential designation in the Comprehensive Plan and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. 4. The development of single - family residential homes for this property is intended by the zoning ordinance. 5. Granting the requested variance will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied to other owners in the same zoning district and it will not be materially detrimental to property within the same zoning district. U 123 Nc -24472 Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 P. 9 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 • Final Plat for Major Subdivision Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Anderson Grove at Idlewood final plat as submitted with the following conditions: 1. Approval of the preliminary plat and variance applications concurrently submitted. 2. The applicant shall meet the conditions set forth in the plat opinion received from the City Attorney and any subsequent supplemental opinions. 3. Payment of park dedication fees in the amount of $8,700.00 prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording. 4. Drainage and utility easements, as required by the City Engineer, shall be provided and shown on the final plat. 5. As applicable, payment of all required utility fees at the current approved rates prior to release of the resolution. 6. Removal of the existing driveway and utilities disconnect that serve the original house, prior to the release of the final plat or submittal of an agreement, to be prepared by the City Attorney, and cash escrow in the amount of 125% of a • contractor's estimate(s) which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director or designee. 7. As applicable, the installation of new water and sewer service must be completed prior to release of the Resolution or some type of acceptable financial guarantee provided, such as a cash deposit, letter of credit or performance bond, to cover the cost of utility service connections prior to the release of the Resolution for recording. 8. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction including but not limited to installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be replaced. 9. Applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the final plat application. 10. The applicant shall record the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the final plat for recording shall be deemed as conclusive evidence that conditions have been met. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all required local or agency permitting, including, but not limited to, a demolition permit, building permit, and all required Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permit(s). • 123 Nc 2448- Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 P. 10 Case #12- 16,12 -18,& 12 -19 for 5938 Idlewood Road Major Subdivision September 27, 2012 • CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE The preliminary plat, including the recommendations from the Planning Commission, will be presented at an upcoming City Council public hearing. At this time, the tentative date for the City Council public hearing is Tuesday, October 23, 2012 but is subject to change. • • 123 Nc 2449 ' Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 i r . „• .� MAJOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 5364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952 - 472 -0620 Planning Commission Date M. City Council Date C ) FEES MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION. RECD A n CHECK BOX TYPE OF APPLICATION FEE Name of Proposed Plat �itrDb/.�Sa C 1�� c Ikc SKETCH PLAN REVIEW $200* X PRELIMINARY PLAT J Z— 1 b $350 +$15 per lot >( FINAL PLAT 12 —1 q $350 +$15 per lot CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ PDA $350 * The applicant is: owner Email ,-Zvti , Inis(012 — —� G =— ESCROW DEPOSIT $5,000 x VARIANCE Z— ($ $200 TOTAL $ * CALL THE MOUND PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO CONFIRM CURRENT FEES. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE. PROPERTY Subject Address 5 93 S _o 1 1e Po , 1t#d ' Rd- l INFO Name of Proposed Plat �itrDb/.�Sa C 1�� c Ikc Ate" EXISTING Lot 10 Subdivision LEGAL PID# , 5 �I '7 '� 70� " �� ' �. Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) DESCRIPTION APPLICANT The applicant is: owner Email ,-Zvti , Inis(012 — —� G =— 1 Name - . r. ,, , ( ._.c_ r.�° 1 (v 1 4 1 Address PC> C-P 11; (�,�Z� T X r_. a� n i a°? , bA N `:i � 3,3 j Phone Home Wor ax Name C,,/i' 4 Email (if oth Address "le >a i.). ( � -I��y� ''�. applicant) Phone Home t lJ_' 7f ' 3-7,V�3 Work Fax Name j p ri.Z I�YYr psi C'�? Email SURVEYOR/ ENGINEER Address 8 "bQio l�'(�:: -. Y14 +-J [� Phone Home Work 7/n 7 7 ° 5 ' Fax • • ^" C16 • Major Subdivision Information -2450- (8/30/2012) Page 5 of 6 Description of Proposed Use: • i r'il: -�� 116A f " t i I �� ✓1+J�1 f? f d'ii la�N EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Number of Structures: Number of Dwelling Units /Structure: Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: sq. ft. Total Lot Area: sq. ft. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this • property? ( ) yes, tA no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided (including Section 121 of the Mound City Ordinance) and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Print Applicant's Name l' cant' i ! re Date Print Owner's Name's Owner's ignatu e Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature • Hlo:26LI c�- Date Date Major Subdivision Information -2451- (8/30/2012) Page 6 of 6 nAAk QMf OF Nn IND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 951- 472 -0600 FAX 962- 472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date City Council Date Please tym or print le ibl Case No. - SUBJECT Address `3 �' .1 d /-c �. ►o /'�/. PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Block S��: 1�+L�T St j i r ,� c. .� DESC. Subdivision PID # J l 7,2 ��.� O / 0 2. Zoning R1 R1A R2 R3 81 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Narne R" 'tc.d Ak�S re, s Email Il OWNER C o +M`A'r''( Qv►��S '� Address 2GO Z L , AA , , jAj(,� ice. Phone Home 95 ' SYS•3 -7 g Lrk Fax APPLICANT Name 5 a n �� i Email # �r-t ..1+►�s1 S �. (IF OTHER THAN Address Pc> (o "t 'L �,CA_k 1 i t 4g_ . AA +rti► ` � , s t OWNER) Phone Home Work g Z ° S' red °68 i t Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No ( ). if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. yet ty • C� 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Irrlorrnaibn C .p '+� 'T et"*" (&i i .' • (11612012) Page 4 of 6 -2452- CCC111 • SETBACKS REQUIRED REQUESTED (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E W) Y ft, ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ; 0 ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) r C> Rear Yard: (N S E W) _ ,� ft. ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) N ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. Lot Size: 10 sq ft p _�( r.sq ft 3. Do th existi structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district I Ich it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): • Case No. C a- bg VARIANCE ft. ey ig ft. N f fL ft. ft. ft. sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ft 5-S 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses pemnitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography () soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage existing situation ( ) too shallow X shape POtherk specify Please describe: SZ-- C7 Variance Information 0 /6!2012) Page 5 of 6 -2453- Case No. b P y • 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No (). If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain: A4a 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? YesX), No { ). if no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? • 9. Comments: �1/ PIZOJ Lcf (^JAS I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Si Applicant's Variance Information (102012) Page 6 of 6 Date Date 4 r k.- i -2454- Project Narrative: Anderson Grove at Idlewood Background: For the past 90+ years, the Anderson family lived on 2 %: ac. in southwestern Mound. Priscilla, local teacher & daughter of the original family parents, recently passed after extended challenges with health. The family is looking to sell the estate to satisfy financial obligations. Property History - Area: In the early 20 century, this area of Mound was occupied by a Baptist camp. During & after this use, the property in this area was subdivided into small "cabin" lots. These lots were planned to be accessed via a series of preserved right -of -way corridors. Although the area is now developed, these lots & the remnant right -of -way still exist. Property History — Anderson: Roland & Ruth bought the property in 1920 and eventually sold a portion of the land to their daughter Priscilla who with her husband Paul built the existing home (1940's). Similar to the proposed concept, the property was previously subdivided into the central lot & additional lots fronting on Idlewood (see colored Henn. Ctny. graphic to right). Since the Anderson's had no interest in selling, they combined the parcels into one homesteaded parcel. Of note — due to the previous existing plat, the central part of the property had driveway access to two streets —via Fairfield (which used the existing right -of -way) and Idlewood • (which crossed the previously platted lots). Concept Plan Discussion: This past summer a concept plan for this project was submitted & reviewed by Staff, Planning Commission, & City Council. The principle difference in the concept vs. the current plat is the access point of Lot 1. Given the unique nature of the area & specific parcel, the concept review resulted in City Council's general support of the subdivision with specific direction for us to provide access to Lot 1 via a min. 14' driveway at Idlewood. The current plat as submitted meets /exceeds the Council's direction. The Lots: Lots 2, 3, & 4 meet /exceed city zoning standards (typically 60' wide vs. proposed 76' wide). Lot 1 is 1 acre in size. Utilities: All lots are to be serviced by city sewer & water at Idlewood Rd. Access: All lots are accessed on Idlewood Road. Plat Request: The family is seeking to subdivide the main parcel (approx. 1.9 ac.) into a total of 4 lots. Lot 1 is currently under purchase agreement to be sold subject to successful plat approval as.proposed. • Thank you for your support. We remain available to discuss your questions. -2455- q I "•s_ ! 1 4 47102 SF I 3 < 11 � 3 1'� + J I 1 � � — � f - fi r ` /. . � . . J �b • I I J ii II N.11L -J -*--- L - _ --- J -- ^----J Z I i 1 , , — I i( ..� 2 1 :I 1: II I: 14 :1 + 1 SF 1 11400 SF I , 11 11543iSF II 1 I I 1 I 1 22 i� 21 i �� i t i i t Ir ' Owner's Representative & Contact - ------------- - Brent Hislop --F Brent. h islop CoD SvneravLa ndCom pane -com www.SynergvLandCompa 47102 SF au°fa! I 3! 11 � 3 1'� + J I 1 � � — � f - fi r ` /. . � . . J �b • I I J ii II N.11L -J -*--- L - _ --- J -- ^----J Z I i 1 , , — I i( ..� 2 1 :I 1: II I: 14 :1 + 1 SF 1 11400 SF I , 11 11543iSF II 1 I I 1 I 1 22 i� 21 i �� i t i i t Ir j _J l Owner's Representative & Contact �,yne�gY Land Comity Wo&iq to u%er. Dem?ol inq valve. Brent Hislop (612) 590 -0811 Brent. h islop CoD SvneravLa ndCom pane -com www.SynergvLandCompa • • J x coma mm2 cn M i z 00 N q Q l O � 1 1 O 0 Z v Z Z m X W O Z 0 m v m O O v z O o O m M C) 2 m .1*,I M 0 J N l J v ro x� ro O�Nm� t�+Zm�2 A N Z x� mzim A RAI A ° �$oA N n 2 �p A ° GG S" D Z O m U) O z M G) OX C O v< �m Z �i v r m O O v o a L'S � e I 9 3 3 3 gg 3gg 9 O I - - -� f]_ l I Ln j 1 '- -- OO O l� 1 I � i � I 1 Y � � �• �� I M / tZ I -- - - ------- s ------ ------- 3NVI ONI1dl --- --------- - - - - -- 99L 'ON uonANRS saoRp�V 1 69 w 1. 1••1 091 i••M N Io w9 • t•o3 ■ m � O N U — N — -- 98b •i �l. • ,... - aNdl 13M I N,tt N I •N 1• WI OSZ 1•o3t w4 N• N ti$ ------ - - - - -� - -� �a f - - -- — i 3 I LO N I r ---------- - - - - -i I � N � I I ---------------------------------------------- i I 80 Z<4 I I I m I I I i al i m I L - 2 .9 1 0 I I i i i I I I I I 1 09 I I I I I i I I i 1 i I I I I I O 4 r r 0) z 0 z V z W 0 O O w J Q w O w 0 Z w 0 Z Q N r 4 N V) N' tL O N O z z 2 0 z M 2 N LO Nt N Eos S . NQH x nd� u E w 9 co E �iwd E y $� 8 e c 6 a O 7ir3 Z g' 4 d g >s • Y E! A i -t•18 Id _ a • �a£d 00 zz zww 0 ui FL ? j UwvO 3 3 3 gg 3gg 9 3 �' � v, ILL > I I 2 I L Z I r — _ I Y I J' I I J r ---- - - - - -� - - -- � I LO 3NV I NOd31 -- `----- - - - - -� ► �r L \ L > 18 3,Ot,9t n 1 _ •01 3,OZ,S4.00N d• S i a \ 8 - - -- - -- - — - - -- I m � O N U — N — -- 98b •i �l. • ,... - aNdl 13M I N,tt N I •N 1• WI OSZ 1•o3t w4 N• N ti$ ------ - - - - -� - -� �a f - - -- — i 3 I LO N I r ---------- - - - - -i I � N � I I ---------------------------------------------- i I 80 Z<4 I I I m I I I i al i m I L - 2 .9 1 0 I I i i i I I I I I 1 09 I I I I I i I I i 1 i I I I I I O 4 r r 0) z 0 z V z W 0 O O w J Q w O w 0 Z w 0 Z Q N r 4 N V) N' tL O N O z z 2 0 z M 2 N LO Nt N Eos S . NQH x nd� u E w 9 co E �iwd E y $� 8 e c 6 a O 7ir3 Z g' 4 d g >s • Y E! A i -t•18 Id _ a • �a£d 00 zz zww 0 ui FL ? j UwvO • • • i I I 1 I I 1 I I ( I I I I I I I CD z s — 7 24 � / 1 �I 0 1 -- t VI m I p I z , 0,A 2 00 - -- - _ 1 I -�J I y — y MIT� • �la fv�tq L J I -- '1 I P 1 ' 3 ? A U' 8 ;q Z„ v R 3 P M 3 •w O hO o � r. 0 c Z v Z I z m O z O X O D v G O v . X Z I I t `-------------------------- ---------------- I I I N I so 1 r I I - ------ -- - - - - -- SI O IQ it it I I i i I 1 / I I ffi V O °4 IWeel une of the East 210 teat f the Wt .� of Lot 59. IuBda'e subdivision !"!"W. 1 i WET LAND SW57 150.00 '.___ - 210.01 r - ------ - - - - -- -N v 1 — — to IL i 8� wN I 41 i SS 7 L _ _ __p,1_ 7 i --- --. - ' 1 r ---- ese e 9 - - - - - -� j " $ �T 4 IL - -- �t�+ -_ 31 --- - - - s -- m I I t ° I � > I - - - - _ I - - - - --- 0 I O 46 I Nw45'20'E 210. 1 I L--- - -.- -- -- J 18'10*E 50.00 ^-------- - - - - -� - -'1 24 BLOCK 7 I ' - - -- 1 ------ ---- - - - - - LEACH LANE I _ (-- i--- - - - - -- i j - - - -- ----- - - - - --- cn i I 1 i n I ! 2J I r- � - - ' ( 1 E°et Rm of the West 460 feet a a 50. AMIfteo Sub°Mtlon Nw 169 J I I 1 ' I I U i� I f ig I I I m I I I KIPLING LANE s — 7 24 � / 1 �I 0 1 -- t VI im I l �. S� 1 _ I z , 0,A 1 1 U ' 1 a i F_ I r - - - -- I i / 1 I 24 i - - - -- B LOCK g -- '1 I �o 0 ° o �N g @ € I I . o g I =� .5 o X0 to na' I uw 00 0 .. ° a 33 a fc v ° Sr i cm $ u 3 rt S' g • E � o K I N N V) _ t rZ V � G C7 • • • m a vi cr m @ �°rS. S S S S S S S z r ' Z z osm �y m Lee Smm -�mtn i7'a $$ 0 14 1 1 g s S 8 M -A 4 $ 80 2S m om AO�rnm �� M � h J 1 f 0 C J N R r_ O Q H a A 0 0 W a A N -9:4 W O z 0 U) W A z r S s yyRR o p s i l • M a a'pf a ^ - a O N fil a p rp Z` V Y r v A oLS g 6 ci g 3 °as S• $ sr o su ° o v M 1 it ° € 3 ° o i VCS o o I C H n Q a W 1:1 : • ° s o $$ w J �a ^ f I 4- a� 4Ys m F w g E r i o1.g o $ L (n W e u O S ° 0 i � ` .7 S . w OT « Q it R E 0 a 3 • ° � _ • w �k O a • « € i 2` I •� 3 Q • V� O =O m p s� o Q T o in o a Yy � o a` s ° £SY`o w Z_ g• r c mr I u ° ul 3 o i o a. 11 LSj�° a c of �o� d°. a • r w i° =o ea m 1 b i w °`S•�S 8 5 rc ' 4 s a 49 r y ° o Or 1 M r y J of i c S - - YS w a Y T a r ` s r5' ac z• .cg v o o s u a� o - t ail �3 3 o i �Ca�i c w a � Y Yf �-4J Z• 1 C m N F Z$ -• ° C I , LO — - T____, z I I CM Go LOD / r / �W J : 0 1 � CSC 3NV_1 Hov31 — _ 1 J" s 3Nb'l JNIIdIN s "` (- - -- �-- - -- -------------- - - - - -- Y 04 09Y W.1 ow N wq 1'v3 \ 1 I — � Pl,l . �! — J Q V 0 a I L -- ----- $ g 3N80H1Mt1H j o I - - - - -- I 1 Pi 33 — . o il N_ rn# i ---- - --- -- I N O I toro .�tsoiooa _ -- - - - - -� ?�� • ° $s oaotit M.iC161o0i LU I QNV1 i3M t Iw oar wr .w r +.n ols x, - .4. wa d R 1 i 34 I 0 — 1 Q ~ 1 1 1 1 w sx KI I* 10 R 1 N d "� H J I , ; ; — +----- r -------- ---- - - - - -� ' >I Owe Ct IS / v ____ \ l j 41. j En 1 001 LL LL JJ C13 iJ J- _________ _ ___________� , O °;, JJ I i i - --- ; - - - - -- ------- Z ,\ I I � � I I Cl) 3 �, O a. N 58 I t pZ i' 7JJaJ �1JJJJJJJJJJ .l�ld �1SJ J"J•777 >B6 \♦ Os \ 1 1 I O g N oo �aJJJ JJJJJ �SJJ _\ \\ \\ o,\ b \ •.�._....._._._...._.. - o4r ipM .yt W iMl Oti 7 «a w N+u t.WM� I W I ----------- --- - - - - -- - - - -i i Z t\! I I r ----- -- ------- --- —m -- --; i 1 ti J Nd � H J V J l i ; i _ __________ _____________,� i tiz 101 9 J --- --�- --- -- - ---- 1- 1---� ---� L--- ------- / r f --- - c - - -- - -- - I t i I II I I I ----- - - - -�- 5 - - --I If j c\ I r I ai -- - -- - -- I w - = - - - -- __ L I i V L - -- ------I -- r I a LL I I g co L_._-_ ------- �— —I I I z - ------- 1 I -- -- Z \ 99x L \ I I I I a vs — 990 .. I.() ! aNY1 Am ' I •.t1 u"Mqn5 e,AWIwN 'es ie'I W 1 N L `o ...... 7NM .N W iW OtZ i�o3 W7 W DWI iWMI + �^ s� i____ ______________ __ __ __ 1 I I I N 1 I -2460- , ((� m ' Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application Local Government Unit (LGU) Address City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 1_ PRnIF.VT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Brent Hislop, 5938 Idlewood Rd Application Number Synergy Land Company Mound, MN Sept. 5, 2012 Decision -maker for this application: Type of Application (check all that apply): ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ❑ Exemption Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Summary and description of Wetland Delineation Report additional 0 • 2. APPLICATION REVIEW AND DECISION Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 3 provides notice that an application was made to the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. A copy of the application is attached. Comments can be submitted to: Name and Title of LGU Contact Person Mark Perry, Natural Resources Specialist Comments must be received by (minimum 15 business - day comment period): Sept. 27, 2012 Address (if different than LGU) Date, time, and location of decision: Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sept. 27, 2012 2638 Shadow Lane 3:00 PM Chaska, MN 55318 Bolton & Menk Inc. office Phone Number and E -mail Address Decision -maker for this application: 952.448.8838 ® Staff markpe@bolton - menk.com ❑ Governing Board or Council Siignature: " ' - -- -2461- 13WSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Date: q --- �2 Page 1 of 2 3. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: ® BWSR TEP member: [❑ LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): ® DNR TEP member: ❑ DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) ® WD or WMO (if applicable): ❑ Applicant (notice only) and Landowner (if different) El Members of the public who requested notice (notice only): ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager (notice only) ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only) 4. MAILING INFORMATION i s ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr. state .mn.us /contact/WCA areas.pdf ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.nm.us /wetlands /wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region NE Region Central Region Southern Region Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidji, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 1 St. Paul, MN 55106 1 New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http:// files .dnr.state.mn.us /aboutdnr /dnr regaons.pdf ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.MW.usace.gM.rnil/re ug latory /default.asp ?t)aeeid =687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP -R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101 -1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 In addition to the application, list any other attachments: ® ACOE JD application EJ 5. ATTACHMENTS BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 -2462- Page 2 of 2 Project/Site Name: Idlewood Rd Parcel Local Government Unit: City of Mound Location (address and /or T, R, Sec.): A part of the SE % of Sec. 23, TI 17N, 2. Applicant Information \ 20 Applicant Name: Brent Hislop (Synergy Land Co) Address: P.O. Box 470 City, State, Zip: Chanhassen, MN 55317 E -mail: brent.hislop@SynergyLandCompany.com Phone: (612) 590 -0811 3. AgentlConsultant Information Company Name (if applicable): Arrowhead Environmental Consul. Contact Person: Ben Carlson Address: 2909 Meadow Lane City, State, Zip: Mound, MN 55364 E -mail: benc @arrowheadec.com Phone: 612 - 237 -5996 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: a Wetland Boundary (must attach wetland delineation report) Q Wetland Type (Eggers & Reed and /or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a determination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the landowner to pursue this determination. ✓�" ` 9/2/2012 Applicant or Authorized Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: 0 • ° - -^ 4 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 2463- 11/10/08 1. Project/Site Information • Idlewood Road Property — Mound, MN Wetland Delineation Report For: Brent Hislop Synergy Land Company P.O. Box 470 Chanhassen, MN 55317 ■(K_.�E &.' z I { RI ) , 2012 • EA AM 0 &T all W 0 Wetland Consulting Services Performed by: Ben Carlson, WDC ( #1125) AEC Project # 2012 -044 September 2, 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting 2909 Meadow Lane Mound, MN 55364 • -2464- TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Overview: Summary of Project and Results Report Body: Introduction ....................................................................................... ..............................I Methods ............................................................................................. ..............................I Results. ............................................................................................... ..............................I Discussion ....................................................................................... .........•...................._ 2 Data Sources and Literature References ...................................................................... 3 Project Figures and Supporting Data: Figure 1: Map of Project Location (USGS Topo) Figure 2: Map of Project Location (MN DNR PWI Map) Figure 3: Hennepin County Soil Survey Figure 4: National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 5: Map of Wetland Delineation (GPS Located) Figure 6: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Functional Assessment Map Field Data Collection Forms (Data Sheets) Photo Log �1 *I 01 -2465- • Project Overview On August 15 and September 2 °d , 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland delineation at the Idlewood Road Property located in Mound, MN. • One wetland basin was delineated within and adjacent to the parcel bounds; Wetland I is a Shrub -Carr /Coniferous Bog located along the northern and western portions of the parcel. • Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEM/SS 1 C and PFO 1 C wetland. • Wetland 1 is not indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map (PWI). • Wetland 1 is mapped in the Klossner Muck Hydric soil series. • Wetland 1 is dominated by sedge, cattail, dogwoods, tamarack, green ash, and red maple. • The wetland boundary were generally placed along the vegetative transition from hydrophytic to non - hydrophytic vegetation (which correlated to a rise in topography), and the presence or lack of hydrology indicators. • • -2466- Introduction • On August 15 and September 2 2012 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland delineation at the Idlewood Road Property located in Mound, MN. The legal description of the project location is: A part of the SE '/a of Section 23, TI 17N, R24W, Hennepin County, Mound, Minnesota. The parcel is a total of 1.87 acres (according to the Hennepin County Website); the property address is 5938 Idlewood Road, the PID # is 2311724420102. Methods AEC utilized the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and Midwest Regional Supplement to perform the wetland delineation. A United States Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Mound Quad) (Figure 1), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory (PWI) Map (Figure 2), the Hennepin County Soil Survey Map (Figure 3), and the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map (Figure 4) were reviewed prior to the site visit and used in the delineation process. The delineated wetland boundaries (GPS located) are indicated on Figure 5 and are overlaid on a 2010 aerial image. Figure 6 shows the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Functional Assessment Map; the wetland in question is considered a "Preserve" wetland under the Districts classification system. AEC used the routine delineation method. Wetland classification followed methods described by the USACOE - St. Paul District; is Eggers and Reed "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of MN and WI ". The Circular 39 and Cowardin et al. classifications are given as well. The indicator status of plants was determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands — Region 3 (Sabine 1999). In accordance with the Midwest Regional Supplement, the + and — have been removed from the vegetation indicator status. Pink pinflags were used to delineate the wetlands and were numbered sequentially; flagging was hung from adjacent vegetation to aid in location of the pinflags. Sample points were taken to document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators within representative upland and wetland locations. Results Office Results Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEM/SS 1 C and PFO 1 C wetland. Wetland 1 is mapped in the Klossner soil series; the Klossner soil series is classified as a hydric soil (SCS Hydric Soils of the United States). Wetland 1 is not indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map (PWI). U -2467- • Field Results Wetland 1 AEC classified Wetland 1 as a Shrub -Carr /Coniferous Bog (Type 6/8, PSS/F02E) wetland. Wetland 1 is dominated by sedge (Carex) species, cattail (Typha) species, willow (Salix) species, dogwood (Corpus) species, green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red maple (Acer rubrum), and tamarack (Larix laricina). The adjacent upland area is dominated by Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pennsylvanica), ironwood (Ostrya virginiana), red oak (Quercus rubra), and sugar maple (Acer saccharum) with minor amounts of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica). Along the fringe of the wetland is essentially a shallow "moat" of saturated (organic) soil consisting of a sparsely vegetated concave surface (shallow water is present in this area during the early part of the growing season). The wetland area then transitions into a Shrub -Carr /Coniferous Bog dominated by organic (mossy) soils. The boundary for Wetland 1 exhibited rather steep slopes; in general there was a defined transition between the sparsely vegetated concave surface (wetland) and the Pennsylvania sedge and upland hardwoods. The wetland soil boring met the A2 (Histic epipedon) hydric soil indicator with saturation at the surface. The upland soil boring did not meet a hydric soil indicator and was lacking hydrology indicators. Discussion One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds. Areas delineated as wetland • met the three criteria required for a wetland delineation; dominance of hydrophytic vegetation, presence of hydric soil, and (at a minimum) one primary hydrology indicator or two secondary hydrology indicators under normal conditions. In order to be official the wetland delineation must be reviewed and approved by the Local Government Unit (LGU) and potentially other agencies (Local, State, Federal). Any work within or adjacent to a wetland will require Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) permits (and potentially other permits). Please consult with AEC if you plan on filling, draining, excavating wetlands within your project location. If you have any questions regarding this report or any questions about our services please feel free to contact Ben Carlson at any time (612- 237 - 5996). Thank you, J� 6*-4� Ben Carlson, WDC Ecologist/Owner Arrowhead Environmental Consulting • -2468- Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LGU) Address City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 1 PR(LiF.rT TNFnRMATinN Applicant Name Brent Hislop Project Name 5938 Idlewood Rd Date of Application Application Number Synergy Land Company Mound, MN 9/5/2012 M2 -2012 ® Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel ❑ Approve Summary (or attach): and Recommendation (it any): ❑ Approve with conditions ❑ Deny 0 • 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: Sept. 27, 2012 ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attac additional sheets as necessary): The Wetland Report is complete and accurate and indicates the presence of one wetland. U 24 BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Pagel of 3 For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑ Financial Assurance: For project - specific replacement that is not in- advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project - specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! 11' IT Aiithnrimd Sign ature_ Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Mark L Perry Natural Resources Specialist Signature Date Phone Number and E -mail 9/27/2012 952.448.8838 markpe @bolton - menk.com THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ❑ Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition and $ fee (if applicable) to: ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 &ZIU111 BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 2 of 3 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: stacey .lijewski @co.hennepin.ma.us ® BWSR TEP member: lynda.peterson @state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): ® DNR TEP member: John.Gleason @state.mn.us ❑ DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member) ® WD or WMO (if applicable): cbach @minnehahacreek.org ❑ Applicant and Landowner (if different) ❑ Members of the public who requested notice: melissa.m.jenny @usace.army.mil ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan decisions only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr. state .mn.us /aboutbwsr /workareas /WCA areas .12d ➢For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us /wetlands /wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf ➢Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region NE Region Central Region Southern Region Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 Bemidji, MN 56601 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http: / /fiiles.dnr.state.jnn.us /aboutdnr /dnr re ions.12d.f ➢For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.myp.usace.army.mil /re ug latory /default.asl2?pageid =687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District, ATTN: OP -R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101 -1678 ➢For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: -2471- • • • BWSR Forms 7 -1 -10 Page 3 of 3 K ennedy Graven Offices in 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis Minneapolis, MN 55402 Saint Paul (612) 337 -9300 telephone (612) 337 -9310 fax St. Cloud wwwkennedy- graven.com Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer CORRINE A. E EM Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337 -9217 Email: chebw@kennedy-graven.com MSBA Board Certified Real Property Specialist September 14, 2012 Ms. Sarah Smith City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE. Plat Opinion forANDERSON GROVEAT IDLEWOOD Our File No. MU220 -5 Dear Ms. Smith: is At your request, I have reviewed a title commitment issued by Premier Title Insurance Agency, Inc. on behalf of Fidelity National Title Insurance, ,Commitment No. 30125.1, with an effective date. of July 30, 2012, at 7:00 A.M. (the "Commitment "). The Commitment purports to cover the following described property (the "Property"), which is proposed to be platted as ANDERSON GROVE AT IDLEWOOD: The South 210 feet of the East 210 feet of the West 460 feet of Lot 59, Auditor's Subdivision No. 168, Hennepin County, Minnesota; Also, Lots 17 through 21, inclusive, Block One (1), The Highlands, Hennepin County, Minnesota. In addition to reviewing the Commitment, I have reviewed a copy of the preliminary plat for ANDERSON GROVE AT IDLEWOOD prepared by Campion Engineering Services, Inc. I have the following comments: 1. Plat must be signed by the fee owner and all mortgagees of the Property. The Commitment identifies those interest holders as: a. Priscilla S. Anderson (fee owner), whom the staff report indicates is deceased. In order to determine who must sign the plat and what additional documents must be provided, I need to know whether, at the time of recording the plat, the title to the Property will have been transferred to the heir(s) or devisee(s) of Ms. Anderson or • whether it will still be held by her estate. I also need to know whether there was a 41099%1 CAH MU220 -5 -2472- Ms. Sarah Smith September 14, 2012 Page 2 is will and whether the probate proceedings are formal, informal or supervised. When I have that information, I can provide additional guidance on execution of the plat. b. Bremer Bank, National Association (as mortgagee). In lieu of signing the plat, the mortgagee may provide any of the following instruments for recording prior to the plat: partial release of mortgage; satisfaction of mortgage; consent to plat. We require review of the instrument. 2. Real Estate taxes must be paid in full prior to the recording of the plat. 3. The Commitment indicates that the Property is subject to "easements of record" but identifies no specific easements. The existence of easements does not affect who must sign the plat. However, if perimeter easements were dedicated in the plat of The Highlands, the City may wish to vacate those easements prior to the recording of this plat. This letter does not purport to set forth every matter relevant to a determination of whether title to the property is marketable, and no one should rely upon it for that purpose. The sole purpose of this letter is to identify required signatories to the plat and related issues of interest to the City in connection with platting, as evidenced by the Commitment. • Sincerely, &U.., d. AL-P� Corrine A. Heine CAH jms cc: Melissa I Manderschied • 4109990 c aHMU22 0 -5 -2473- Y • 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD CITY OF MO UND MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT MAJOR SUBDIVISION FOR A PROPOSED 4-LOT SINGLE - FAMILY SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5938 IDLEWOOD ROAD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mound Planning Commission will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter on Tuesday, October 2, 2012 to hold a public hearing to consider a preliminary plat - major subdivision application from Synergy Land Company LLC for a proposed 4-lot, single - family subdivision of the property located at 5938 Idlewood Road (PID No. 23- 117- 24-42- 0102). In addition to the public hearing for the preliminary plat, review of a variance application and the proposed final plat ("Anderson Grove at Idlewood') will be also reviewed and discussed. Copies of the applications and related information about the proposed project is • available for viewing at City Hall during regular office hours or by appointment. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting By: Jill Norlander Planning and Building Inspections Published in the Laker on September 22, 2012 • -2474- ® printed on recycled paper ANDERSON GROVE AT IDLEWOOD- 0 ! _I ns. 210 0" d ft I" to ------------ IM I m -2475- I � � I lu II Li ly SF --- J----- L ---- - - - - -- 0 u 9 General Fund 1,011,135 Park Dedication Fees 13,075 Area Fire Protection Services 385,513 Dock 282,971 Mound HRA 31,221 G.O. Equip. Certf. 2007 - C (255) G.O. Equip. Certf. 2008 - D 12,544 G.O. Equip. Certf. 2009 - C 26,879 Mound Transit Center Series 2006 87,137 G.O. Bonds 2003 - C TIF 1 -2 429,038 G.O. Bonds 2005 - A 330,267 G.O. Bonds 2006 - A 342,414 G.O. Bonds 2007 - A 388,444 G.O. Bonds 2008 - B 288,733 G.O. Bonds 2009 - A 67,713 G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011 - A 87,529 G.O. Bonds 2011 - B (26,878) G.O. Bonds 2012 - A 63,451 G.O. Refunding Bonds 2012 - B 22,529 Taxable G.O. TIF Bonds 2008 A 68,233 HRA Lease Rev Bonds Capital Improvement (126,325) 1,116,121 MSA 330,740 Sealcoat (42,014) Downtown TIF 1 -2 63,910 Downtown TIF 1-3 MHR 86,068 Water 1,282,408 Sewer 144,018 Liquor Store (122,491) Recycling 42,620 Storm Water 192,096 283,512 Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated /reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the Independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. • In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. -2476- SAFINANCE DEPT\REPORTS \2012 \CASHREPORTCOUNCIL 2012.XLS CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT September 2012 75.00% MTD YTD PERCENT • BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED GENERALFUND 1,063,688 68,635 745,305 318,383 70.07% Council 78,715 9,728 54,377 24,338 69.08% Promotions 71,000 30,000 36,892 34,108 51.96% City Manager /Clerk 315,006 22,747 219,631 95,375 69.72% Elections 18,160 219 6,088 12,072 33.52% Finance 310,222 21,994 204,725 105,497 65.99% Assessing 95,600 188 95,218 382 99.60% Legal 123,500 7,563 79,601 43,899 64.45% City Hall Building & Srvcs 107,000 5,472 51,695 55,305 48.31% Computer 43,540 2,769 27,356 16,184 62.83% Police 1,885,438 113,226 1,276,076 609,362 67.68% Emergency Prepardeness 8,150 33 1,854 6,296 22.75% Planning /Inspections 308,092 23,595 197,004 111,088 63.94% Streets 872,772 182,691 665,342 207,430 76.23% Parks 514,760 36,392 368,631 146,129 71.61% Park Dedication Fees - - - - 0.00% Cemetery 11,118 192 1,146 9,972 10.31% Transfers 548,170 27,779 348,739 199,431 63.62% Cable TV 47,492 - 20,783 26,709 43.76% Contingencies 21,800 3,442 26,463 (4,663) 121.39% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 5,380,535 488,030 3,681,621 1,698,914 68.42% , Area Fire Service Fund 1,063,688 68,635 745,305 318,383 70.07% Dock Fund 153,862 2,880 76,921 76,941 49.99% HRA Fund 50,800 3,009 27,261 23,539 53.66% Capital Projects 1,500 672,551 2,371,029 (2,369,529) TIF 1 -2 Downtown Mound - - - - TIF 1 -3 MHR - - 63 (63) Water Fund 1,643,216 99,608 1,356,081 287,135 82.53% Sewer Fund 1,952,387 250,905 1,795,196 157,191 91.95% Liquor Fund 619,212 37,365 382,685 236,527 61.80% Recycling Fund 202,895 13,971 130,884 72,011 64.51% Storm Water Utility 357,168 18,797 333,936 23,232 93.50% • Indian Knoll Manor 285,700 20,123 196,545 89,155 68.79% -2477- S: \FINANCE DEPT \REP0RTS\2012 \EXP- 2012.x1s CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT September 2012 75.00% MTD YTD PERCENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED GENERALFUND Taxes Business Licenses Non - Business Licenses /Permit Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Street Lighting Fee Franchise Fees G.O. Equipment Certificates Charges to Other Dpts Park Dedication Fees Other Revenue GENERAL FUND TOTAL FIRE FUND DOCKFUND MOUND HRA WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND RECYCLING FUND STORM WATER UTILITY INDIAN KNOLL MANOR INVESTMENTS S: \FINANCE DEPT\REPORTS\2012 \REV- 2012.XLS 3,883,001 - 1,993,458 (1,889,543) 51.34% 17,800 - 17,610 (190) 98.93% 126,100 18,507 77,197 (48,903) 61.22% 134,060 - 37,544 (96,516) 28.01% 79,600 22,288 146,397 66,797 183.92% 55,000 3,750 34,910 (20,090) 63.47% 90,589 6,875 61,481 (29,108) 67.87% 397,000 10,372 221,691 (175,309) 55.84% 122,400 - - (122,400) 0.00% 12,000 1,395 7,343 (4,657) 61.19% _ - - 0.00% 313,950 18,583 230,340 (83,610) 73.37% 5,231,500 81,770 2,827,971 (2,403,529) 54.06% 1,063,688 98,813 824,615 (239,073) 77.52% 177,815 - 191,381 13,566 107.63% - 24,597 24,597 n/a 1,480,000 164,427 1,291,061 (188,939) 87.23% 1,494,250 142,201 1,141,848 (352,402) 76.42% 2,800,000 234,314 2,074,583 (725,417) 74.09% 225,276 15,316 173,295 (51,981) 76.93% 389,150 31,621 287,429 (101,721) 73.86% - 19,570 210,389 210,389 n/a - 843 5,073 5,073 n/a -2478- 2 _ )§2 o§§ .9999. 0 � � L A § q z z E O& 0 § \ 9 7 1-4 / J k < kn k k u ° kn C4 9 �ƒ 2 \ \\ \ \ \)7«« I a * 222«2 2 « z ) \ k � ( > A ■� � ±23 $ k .9999. 0 � � L A § q z z E O& 0 • N O � 9 N • Q [ }0 O U Z O N 00 N C O C iV C •� m City of Mound BMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 09/30/12 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners • C32.038996 Mound /Development Reviews 25.50 3,113.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to prop owners 25.50 3,113.00 C12.037921 Mound /General Engineering 108.00 7,058.00 101 General Fund/Taxes C12.038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 0.75 106.50 101 Streets (1 /4)/Taxes 012.300590 Mound /GIS Updates (1/4) 0.88 80.50 101 Streets(1 /4)/Taxes 106.50 602 109.63 7,245.00 Mound /SWPPP Update C32.103970 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 5,432.00 497,935.23 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 012.101221 Mound /Street Light Replacement 7.00 994.00 401 Federal Grants /City Match /MSA C32.101482 Mound /SW Island Area 623.50 54,819.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding C12.1 Moun /Rid /ldlew /Highl _ 329.50 31,826.50 427 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 'C12.1 Mo /20 Stree Utility Impr _ 24.00 2,695.00 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding C12.102990 Mound /Manchester Site & Lynwood Site 3.00 382.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 6,419.00 588,652.73 C32.039425 Mound /MSA System Update 89.50 11,815.50 427 Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds) C12.105052 Mound /2012 Crack Seal & Seal Coat 76.00 8,214.00 402 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding/MSA C32.303581 Mound /2011 Crack Seal Coat Project 1.00 142.00 402 Capital Projects fund /Bonding / MSA 166.50 20,171.50 012.103254 Mound /Watermain Loop Island View 380.50 40,772.50 601 Water Fees C12.038004 Mound /Water System Modeling 4.50 639.00 601 Water Fees C12.038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1 /4) 0.75 106.50 601 Water Fees (1 /4) C12.038388 Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery 601 Water Fees C32.040166 Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 2.50 355.00 601 Water Fees C12.100590 Mound /GIS Updates (1/4) 0.88 80.50 601 Water Fees (1 /4) 389.13 41,953.50 C12.103114 Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 211.50 21,597.50 602 Sewer Fees C12.038077 Mound /I & I Analysis Report 449.50 41,329.50 602 Sewer Fees • C12.038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 0.75 106.50 602 Sewer Fees (1/4) C12.039286 Mound /SWPPP Update 13.50 1,452.50 602 Sewer Fees C12.104413 Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction 211.50 31,658.49 602 Sewer Fees C12.100590 Mound /GIS Updates (1/4) 0.88 80.50 602 Sewer Fees (1/4) 012.102014 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 127.00 12,321.50 602 Sewer Fees 012.104116 Mound /Emergency Forcemain Repair L P1 32.50 3,145.50 602 Sewer Fees 1,047.13 111,691.99 C12.103438 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements 29.50 3,263.00 675 Storm Water Fees C12.037929 Mound /WCA Administration 10.00 935.50 675 Storm Water Fees C12.038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 0.75 106.50 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) C12.100590 Mound /GIS Updates (1/4) 0.88 80.50 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) C12.104174 Mound /2012 Drainage Improvement Project 113.50 13,579.00 675 Storm Water Fees C12.101909 Mound /Surface Water Management 86.50 10,576.50 675 Storm Water Fees 012.104035 Mound /Ridgewood Dickens Drainage Channel 36.50 2,978.00 675 Storm Water Fees 277.63 31,519.00 06/30/12 YTD Total 8,434.50 804,346.72 • -2481- HA N t) 0wT 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: October 23, 2012 Re: Replacement Paee No. 2395 (Consent Agenda Item No. 4F) October 23, 2012 City Council Agenda It was brought to Staffs attention that the draft resolution for the variance for the 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard in the council packet (Item 4F) contains a typo. The typo is found on Page 2395 under the "Now Therefore it Be Resolved' clause (No. 1) and incorrectly states that the detached garage is 26'x 14'. It should be 26'x 24'. A revised resolution to correct the typo has been included as a replacement page. Staff respectfully requests that this correction be included as an amendment to the Council's action on the agenda. Consent Agenda Item 4F Resolution - 2928 Tuxedo Boulevard variance Replacement Page No. 2395 October 23, 2012 City Council Meeting Resolution No. 12- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its October 16, 2012 meeting, reviewed the variance application materials, the Planning Report (PC Case No. 12 -21) and all related supporting information and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Council does hereb approve the requested variance to allow construction of a new ' detached garage, as proposed by the applicant, based on the following findings of fact based on the record: A. Criteria in City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. B. There is currently no garage on the subject property. Having a garage on a residential property is usual and customary and the opportunity to have all- weather protection for vehicles and interior storage is viewed as positive. C. The garage will be located approximately 18 feet from the east curbline of Tuxedo Blvd. D. There is a road easement on the subject property along Tuxedo Boulevard. E. The lot is irregularly shaped and has varied topography. Construction of a structure in the NW corner of the property is the only location which is functional as placement of a structure in the south portion of the property would affect drainage. F. The slope easement on the subject property is not negatively affected. G. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. H. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. I. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. J. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County.