Loading...
1965-07-22H~A!tI~ ~2 1965 at 7:00 P.M at the Mound Village O.ffioe Pres:~nt were: Mayor R. C. Koe.hn~ Trustees Vemaon Brandenbt~rg and Richard DeG i~e: 2ttc]mey Ray P]oetz, Mana~ffer Leonard Kopp, Engineer Cl.t~nceTM ~ ~= Leer. .~kssessj.ng Village .Prape~:'%y -- discus~ed in ietail Brandenbur~ moved .~nd Deguise secondei a ~notion BE IT MOV;£D~ a notice be sent to a.]l commercial, property o'~mers c~ting a chanje in criteria for commercial prperty. The vote was un~i~ously in favor so c~rried VILLAGE OF F~OUiVD Sanitary Sewer 62 - 1 Lateral Main Assessment NOTICE TO OW!iERS OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY: Because of inequities which have become apparent in the review of the ~roposed assessment roll, the 7z!la~e Coumcil has developed the following criteria as t~e point of departure for the assessment of comercial!y-zoned property. These criteria ap[~ear to more fairly assess the benefit enjoyed by a comerciall~--zoned 0roperty. A~plication of these criteria may alter the assessment for some commercially-zoned properties. Althou?~ the law does not req?ire any notice s~ch as this, and altho~gh this information cou].d have been acquired by attendance at the contfnued sessions of t~e assessment hearings, the Cc':ncil bas ~rovided that t~is notice be sent to ass~re that yo,~.~ are f'~lty informed. The standard weighting of commercial .footao-e at 120% of residential footage has been retained. A ~ifty foot minimum has been imposed which will eq.~ate a minim~m commercial assessment to a minimum residential assessment. Corner co~z~sercis. 1 pro[erties wVere mains have been installed on bot~ sides will be assessed for all of t~:e front street footage ?lus 2~?] of side street footaf!:e. You are reminded that, as annc~nced at the first session of the assessment hearing, the attended assessment ro~l will be available for ins~:~ection in my office from ~,~st ", 196~, ..... . .~-., ~ until ~t~ adoption by the Co~ncil, A~?,~st 12 o6c. t ,JeGuise moved and i:~randenburg seconded a motion BE IT MOVED, the Village Co~.mcil est~b!J, sh a criteria for Multiple ,Dwelling that where mains have been 'installed on both sides, the front side will be assesed for full footage plus 25i~ of side ~treet footage, weigLting ~,!u!tiple B at 115/~ and re~lar Multiple and Multiple C at ].50~ of residential, The vote was ~ma~mo'~sly in favor~ so carried. Note: Each Report of Grievance will be listed by name and legal discription; all. decisions were unanimously decisions of the co~mci, lmen present~ therefore ~otin~ will not be itemized~ in the interest of time and space. Barbara Hes~an~ Village Clerk Kent Eusser Lot 54 Brockton Re~lue'.::~ts ~ average~ but mn average by ,~oin& scros:~ his curved frontage would result in am increase in as..-~essment~ so the orgina! assessmeri, will remain. Hous'hton Smith Parcel 110 and 1120 Sec. 23 Th,sre are two services in one trench. Clarence Anderson Lot 16 Halstead Park No change- correct zoning minimum ~. F. Williams Blk 9 Lots 13, 14~ 19 and 20 - Wyohwood ~.aeck to see if services are in. Charles Hamilton Pt of Lot 27 Subd Lots 1- 32 Skarp and Lindquist Ravenswoo d Criteria reviewed and found correct, property reviewed and no unusal circumstance apparent to supersede criteria, no other g~'ounds for review suggested by objection, orgin~.~l assess~nent confirmed. /mthony '.~ick Lot 54 ;~nd P~rt of 46 - Au~t ~ub 168 Criteria reviewed and found correct, property reviewed and no unusal circumstance apparent to supersede criteria, no other grounds for review suggested by objection,- orgin~l assess~nent confirmed. John Geisth-~rdt Lot 11 Block 7 - 0hadywood Point Criteria reviewed and found correct, property reviewed and no unusal circumstance apparent to supersede criteria, no other grounds for review suggested by objection, orgin~_l assess~nent confirmed. Ralph March Prt of Lot 52 - Lynwold Park Commercial property will be consildered later t!arry Dongoski Lot 21 Blk 14 - ~hady,.~ood Point Criteria reviewed and found correct, property reviewed and no unusal circumstance apparent to supersede criteria, no other grounds for review suggested by objection, orgin~_l assessznent confirmed. Larry Nygaard Lots 3, 4 Prt of 5 - Seifarths Mound Bay Park Reduce footage ~ 117.5 ft. and take off one service charge,., this will add 7'~ ft to lot 6, s me addition(Parcel 6000) to correct error. .~uthony Wick Lot 1 - Seifarths Mound Bay Park Reduce footage on lot ! to 38.34 ft Anthon Wick Lot 50 ~ud Sub 168 Six services are correct correct for o~,mers own plat; has six building sites J. K. Bauer Lots 16 and 17 Skarp & Lindquist Ravenswood Criteria reviewed and found correct, property reviewed and no unusal circumstance apparent to supersede criteria, no other grounds for review suggested by objection, orginal assessment confirmed. ~e~mard Lister Lots 6~ 20 Blk 28 - Seton reduce footage to 60 ft. on Lot 6 & 20 ?mnma O~ren Prt of Lots 25~ 27 & 28 - Lafayette Park Criteria reviewed and found' correct, property reviewed and no unusal circumstance apparent to s'a~persede criteria, no other grounds for review suggested by objection, orginal assess~nent confirmed. Alfred ~wanson Lots I & 2 Mound Two services are correct~ County Road involved~ unreasonable cost of rest orat ion. Hugo Lindberg Lot 6 & 7 Halstead Hgts. Cosmos Gross Lots l, 2 Part of 3 Blk 7 - Whipple Have to t'~ke assessment on the way the lot faces; council requests documents to prove sale of 3 feet Patrick Handy Lot 1 Blk 23 Devon Criteria reviewed and found correct, property reviewed and no unusal circumstance apparent to supersede criteria, no other grounds for review suggested by objection, orginal assessment confirmed. William Hyde Lots 2 & 3 Mound Shores Request for averaging does not follow criteria set up Reduce to one service Roy 13~le Part of lots 1, 2 & 3 Skarps E~.,st Lawn Criteria reviewed and found correct, property reviewed and no un, al circumstance apparent to supersede criteria, no other grounds for review suggested by objection, orginal assess~nent confirmed. Florence Ess Lots 24, 25 Block 26- Wychwood Documents filed to show proof of ownership - Lot 24 and 25 both reduced to 40 feet each Gerald Esselman Lots 6-11 Blk 2 Arden Review of layout of property reveals four building sites so assessment is reasonable and just. Marcella Beise Review later Lots 41-43 Aud Sub 168 Nate Gellman Review later Lots 7, 8 Blk 3 Highlands Brandenburg moved and DeGuise seconded a motion to adjourn until the adjourned hearin~ of July 23~ 1965 after the council meeting, at the Eound Village Office. The vote wa~ unanimously in favor so carried and adjourned. / Attest: ~ /Z ropp ! I