The URL can be used to link to this page

2015-03-10 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CI TV OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2015 — 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 390 -414 *B. Approve minutes: Feb 19, 2015 special meeting workshop 415 -418 Feb 24, 2015 regular meeting 419 -423 *C. Approve Resolution Accepting Bid for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining 424 -425 Wall Improvement Project -- West Three Points Boulevard, City Project Nos. PW- 14 -01, PW -14 -02 *D. Approve Resolution to Amend the 2014 Final Overall Budget 426 -428 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present oil any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Planning Commission Recommendation(s): Consideration of the Mission Woods Applications from Kent Friedrichsen to plat three 429 -487 properties and construct public improvements in the vicinity of Meadow La and Fairfield Rd A. Public Hearing to consider Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat for proposed Mission Woods located in the vicinity of Meadow La and Fairfield Rd (PC Case 14 -15) B. Consideration of Subdivision Exemption, Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat, Zoning Variance, Subdivision Variance, and Major Subdivision -Final Plat of property located in the vicinity of Meadow La and Fairfield Rd (PC Case 14 -16 and 15 -03) Requested Actions: Action on Resolution Approving the Subdivision Exemption of the Property 432 -435 Located at 5913 Fairfield Rd Case No. 15 -03 PID No. 23-117-24-42-0120 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 2. Action on Resolution Approving the Major Subdivision - Preliminary, Plat for the 436 -440 Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow La and Fairfield Rd Case No. 14 -15, 14 -16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117- 24 -42- 0080,23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 3. Action on Resolution Approving a Zoning Variance for Lot Depth of Parcel 3 441 -445 for the Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow La and Fairfield Rd Case No. 14 -15, 14 -16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117- 24 -42- 0080,23 - 117 -24 -42 -0079 and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 4. Action on Resolution Approving a Subdivision Variance for the Street Design 446 -450 Right -of -Way and Cul -de -sac Standards for the Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow La and Fairfield Rd Case No. 14 -15, 14 -16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117- 24 -42- 0080,23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 5. Action on Resolution Approving the Major Subdivision -Final Plat for the 452 -457 Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow La and Fairfield Rd Case No. 14 -15, 14 -16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23-117-24-42-0080, 23-117-24-42-0079 and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Planning Commission: December 16, 2014 488 -490 February 3, 2015 491 -493 PC Workshops: February 9, 2015 494 -495 February 18, 2015 496 C. Reports: Harbor Wines & Spirits: February, 2015 497 D. Correspondence: Letter to Kevin Borg, Supt of Schools: March 5, 2015 498 -500 Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set afloat agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: wutiv. ciiyoJmuund. cona. 'TOTAL ' 1 �� 285p953.54 -390- 3-10-15 MEETING YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2014 2014CITY -AP10 $ 84.38 2014 2014CITY -AP11 $ 11,436.60 2015 021915CTYMAN $ 1,599.84 2015 030615CTYMAN $ 15,718.08 2015 031015CITY $ 171,021.45 2015 031015HS $ 86,093.19 'TOTAL ' 1 �� 285p953.54 -390- MOUND, MN 02/20/15 1:55 Pm Page 1 Payments Current Period: Closing 2014 Batch Name 2014CITYAPIO User Dollar Amt $84.38 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $84.38 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ZACKS, INCORPORATED AP Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies VEHICLE WASH BRUSHES -4 FIRE DEPT $84.38 Invoice 29838 8/2712014 PO 24417 Transaction Date 2/20/2015 Due 12/31/2014 Accounts Payable 20200 Total $84,38 Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $84.38 $84.38 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $84.38 Total -391- MOUND, MN Payments Current Period: Closing 2014 Batch Name 2014CITYAPII User Dollar Amt $11,436.60 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $11,436.60 $0.00 In Balance Refer 4 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM, COMM _ AP Payment E 101 - 49840 -300 Professional Srvs 4TH QTR 2014 PEG ACCESS FEE PER SUBSCRIBER Invoice 12312014 1/20/2015 Transaction Date 2/20/2015 Due 12/31/2014 Accounts Payable 20200 Fund Summary 20200 Accounts Payable 101 GENERAL FUND $11,436.60 $11,436.60 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $11,436.60 Total $11,436.60 -392- 02120115 2:48 PM Page 1 $11,436.60 Total $11,436.60 MOUND, MN 02/20/153:24 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: February 2015 Batch Name 021915CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $1,599.84 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,599.84 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 HAMLINE UNIVERSITY E 101- 45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic SCREEN, CIRCUIT- PARKS TRUCK #209 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -434 Conference & Training 2015 MIDWEST REGIONAL WATER UTILITY $605.00 Transaction Date MGMT INSTITUTE - H. STRICKLEN Wells Fargo 10100 Total Invoice 022015 2/18/2015 PO 24515 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -434 Conference & Training 2015 MIDWEST REGIONAL WATER UTILITY $605.00 MGMT INSTITUTE - J. STEWART Invoice 022015 2/18/2015 PO 24515 Transaction Date 2/19/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,210.00 Refer 3 MOUND, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -430 Miscellaneous REIMB CASH DRAWER SHORTAGE FEB 2015 $28.36 Invoice 022015 2/20/2015 Transaction Date 2/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2836 Refer 2 THOM, JOHN Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -434 Conference & Training BASIC WTR SUPPLY OPERATION & MTCE $150.00 CLASS 3 -2 -15 -J. STEWART Invoice 022015 2/20/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -434 Conference & Training BASIC WTR SUPPLY OPERATION & MTCE $150,00 CLASS 3 -2 -15 - B. BUNN Invoice 022015 2/20/2015 Transaction Date 2/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer 4 WACONIA FORD MERCURY Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic SCREEN, CIRCUIT- PARKS TRUCK #209 $61.48 Invoice 77932 1/8/2015 Transaction Date 2/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61.48 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $89.84 $1,510.00 $1,599.84 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,599.84 Total $1,59984 -393- Refer 6 DERUSHA, GARY & JANE CashPayment R 101- 45000 -34110 Depot Rental Invoice 030615 313/2015 Transaction Date 3/512015 Refer 1 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 022615 2/5/2015 Transaction Date 2/25/2015 ..w - Refer 5 SANKEY CHRIS .. Cash Payment R281-45210-34735 Multiple Slip Permits Invoice 030615 3/3/2015 Cash Payment R 281- 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees Invoice 030615 3/3/2015 Transaction Dale 3/5/2015 Refer 7 SOUTHWEST TRAILS ASSOCIATIO Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow Invoice 030615 3/3/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Refer 2 STEW_ART, JACOB Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 030615 2/20/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Refer 3 V_ER/ZON WIRELESS _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/1012015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2110/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -321 Telephone & Cells l: Invoice 9740351567 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/1012015 DEPOT RENTAL CANCELLATION REFUND G &J DERUSHA Wells Fargo 10100 Total TOOLS, HARDWARE BALANCE DUE- $125.00 $125.00 $29.12 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $29.12 REFUND MULT SLIP FEE -2015 C. SANKEY .$375.00 REFUND MULT SLIP- LMCD FEE -2015 C. $15.00 SANKEY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $390.00 SW TRAILS ASSOC 2015 DNR PMT #1 1 -16- $13,960.75 15 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,960.75 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE- BIB OVERALLS- $99,99 REIMB J. STEWART Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.99 SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 2 -11- $35.01 15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R,. HANSON $35.01 DATACARD SVC 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 Project 15 -3 PUB WKS JET PACK LAPATOP AIRCARD $35.01 SVC 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 Project 15.3 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 2 -11 -15 $17.51 THRU 3 -10 -2015 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 2 -11 -15 $17.50 THRU 3 -10 -2015 DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY $35.01 OFFICER 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 -394- r . CITY OF MOUND 03/05/15 1:16 PM Page 2 Current Period: March 2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #39 RESCUE $35.01 UTILITY 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 Invoice 9740351567 2/1012015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740351567 2/10/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Refer 4 V_ERIZZO_N_ WIRELESS_ Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds Invoice 9740551151 2113/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone Invoice 9740551151 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740551151 2113/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740551151 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740551151 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740551151 2/1312015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740551151 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740551151 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9740551151 2/1312015 Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE 440 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 WATER TRUCK #315 J. STEWART DATACARD SVC 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 WATER TRUCK #512 L. GIESE DATACARD SVC 2 -11 -15 THRU 3 -10 -2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02 -13. 15 CELL PHONE OVERAGE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02- 13 -15 -TO BE REIMB CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02 -13. 15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02 -13- 15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02 -13. 15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02.13- 15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02.13- 15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02 -13- 15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02 -13- 15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 1 -14 -15 THRU 02 -13. 15 Invoice 9740551151 2113/2015 Transaction Date 3/312015 Wells Fargo -395- 10100 Total $35.01 $35.01 $35.01 $35.01 $350.10 $31.08 $3.22 $150.50 $134.74 $135.43 $44.91 $96.23 $50.49 $100.98 $15.54 $763.12 MY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 14 II1Ir�1 J 1� Payments 03/05/15 1:16 PM Page 3 Current Period: March 2015 `.:',`+3, M"E".SlY ?&"1..�'."y.54ai. i3435.i"" .`,^s'&,g Yit 10100 Wells Fargo $14,612.72 $270.14 $390.00 $204.76 $240.46 $15,716.08 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $15,718.08 Total $15,718.08 -396- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: March 2015 L Batch Name 031015CITY User Dollar Amt $171,021.45 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $171,021.45 $0.00 In Balance Refer 32 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. Invoice 51131 Transaction Dal Refer_ Cash Payment Invoice T77034 Cash Payment 2/18/2015 e 3/3/2015 _ 3 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY E 101 -41110 -430 Miscellaneous 2/23/2015 E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice RENT17624 2/5/2015 Transaction Date 2/19/2015 Refer 4 BIGS EASY LIFT Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 65815 2/9/2015 PO 24513 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Refer 6 CENTERPOINT ENERGY(M/NNEG Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 602. 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/2312015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/23/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Refer 5 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (M/NNEG Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/1012015 03105115 12:13 PM Page 1 MINITOR VI AMPLIFIED CHARGER BASE 8, $369.50 ANTENNA ---- -- --- -- Wells Fargo 10100 Total $369.50 COFFEE - COUNCIL MTGS- CENT BLDG $50.95 COFFEE MACHINE EQUIP LEASE- FEB, $45.00 MARCH, APR 2015 CITY HALL Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.95 2 MANHOLE COVER LIFTS /MAGNETS- $4,152.00 BUILDOUT NEW WTR TRUCK 4315 Project' Wells Fargo 10100 Total 4,152.00 $4,-152- 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR $30.48 NATL GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 THRU 1 -21 -15 4791 NORTHERN RD LS D1 GENERATOR $26.93 NATL GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 THRU 1 -21 -15 3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 12 -19-14 $22.61 THRU 1 -21 -15 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $28.34 NATL GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 THRU 1 -21 -15 4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $27.62 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 THRU 1 -21 -15 4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL $23.33 GAS SVC 12 -19.14 THRU 1 -21 -15 5808 GRANDVIEW BLVD LS GENERATOR $29.76 NATL GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 THRU 1 -21 -15 4922 THREE PTS BLVD LS GENERATOR $26.93 NATL GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 THRU 1 -21 -15 Wells Fargo 10100 Total- $216.00 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 TO 1 -21 -15 $1,003.76 -397- Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/10/2015 Cash Payment E 10145200 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 03102015 2/10/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 TO 1 -21 -15 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 TO 1 -21 -15 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 TO 1 -21 -15 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 TO 1 -21 -15 Project 15 -3 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 TO 1 -21 -15 $1,003.76 $1,058.49 $1,455.05 $1,783.50 $631.28 GAS SVC 12 -19 -14 TO 1 -21 -15 DEPOT BLDG $308.87 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,244.71 Refer 40 COLOTTI, JOHN A. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -331 Use of personal auto REIMS MILEAGE- TRIPS TO CITY HALL, $40.25 MMBA MTG ROSEVILLE J. COLOTTI FEB 2015 Invoice 031015 3/5/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $40.25 Refer 7 DELL MARKETING L.P. _ Cash Payment E 101- 41920 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 2 19" FLATSCREEN MONITORS- N. $187.18 IVERSON, BACKUP Invoice XJMW5DD24 2/10/2015 PO 23942 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 19" FLATSCREEN MONITOR- SIGN SHOP $93.59 Invoice XJMW5DD24 2/10/201.5 PO 23942 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 19" FLATSCREEN MONITOR- WATER DEPT $93.59 Invoice XJMW5DD24 2/10/2015 PO 23942 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 19" FLATSCREEN MONITOR -SEWER DEPT $93.59 Invoice XJMW5DD24 2/10/2015 PO 23942 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $467.95 Refer _8 EMER_G_ENCYAPPARATUS MA/NT Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair INSPECT & SVC ENGINE #40 $661.66 PUMPER/TANKER -OIL & FUEL FILTERS Invoice 78389 1/27/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SVC ENGINE #29 - REPAIR POSITIVE WIRE $1,261,26 TERMINAL END & LEAKING COOLANT LINES Invoice 78388 1/27/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SVC RESCUE #22 - INSPECT COOLANT LEAK $973.83 Invoice 78390 1/27/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SVC ENGINE #24 - REBUILD AIR DRYER & $1,717.05 PURGE KIT, CHECK FUEL & AIR LEAKS Invoice 78386 1/27/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair INSPECT & SVC TANKER/PUMPER #35 -OIL $684.73 & FUEL FILTERS Invoice 78391 1127/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair INSPECT & SVC LADDER #17 - REPLACE 2 $1,241.16 REAR BRAKE CHAMBERS Invoice 78416 1/27/2015 GRY OF MOUND • • ' Payments Current Period: March 2015 03/05/15 12:13 PM Page 3 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -500 Capital Outlay FA HALE PORTABLE PUMP, 12V ELECTRIC $7,070.45 PRIMER, HIGH FLOW SUCTION STRAINER, HOSE, COUPLINGS, ADAPTER Invoice 78331 2/2/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SVC RESCUE #22 - REPAIR HEATER CORE, $737.37 ANTIFREEZE Invoice 78700 1/27/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2014 Po Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,347.51 9 FINANCE AND COMMERCE _Refer Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -300 Professional Srvs ADV FOR BIDS -2014 STREET PROJ - STREET $92.62 CONSTRUCTION, CURB & GUTTER PIN 14 -01 Invoice 742024648 2/1612015 Project PW1401 Cash Payment E 401- 43110 -300 Professional Srvs ADV FOR BIDS -2014 STREET PROJ - STREET $92.61 CONSTRUCTION, CURB & GUTTER PIN 14 -02 Invoice 742024648 2/16/2015 Project PW1402 Transaction Date 12 4 _.____...._ Wells Fargo 10100 Total ..._...._... -, ...- -._. - .. $185.2- -_3 Refer - 33 FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC, HENNEPIN -.-w . ,..- ......... . ... . . Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2015 DUES- MOUND FD CHIEF G. $100.00 PEDERSON Invoice 03102015 3/3/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 -- Wells Fargo 10100 Total - -- $100.00 Refer 10 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES,I Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -219 Safety supplies FIRE HELMET WITH EYESHIELD $264.95 Invoice 8663 2113/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -219 Safety supplies 6" CUSTOM LEATHER - DEPUTY FIRE $58.00 MARSHALL PATCH Invoice 8653 2/6/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE- LION TOTAL CARE STAY SAFE $1,420.80 PROGRAM -1YEAR Invoice 8596 2/6/2015 Transaction Date 3/4/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ........ "."` $1,743.75 Refer _ I I FIRSTL_AB .- ,_, °,..�° , ,..- .„......�._....,.. Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -305 Medical Services ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION- DOT RANDOM $250.00 DRUG SCREENS Invoice FL00112761 2/12/2015 Project 15.3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -305 Medical Services DOT PRE - EMPLOYMENT MEDICAL EXAM. 8. $42.95 KRESS Invoice FL00112761 2/12/2015 Transaction Date 31412015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $292 95 Refer 12 FIVE TECHNOLOGY Cash Payment E 10141920 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY SVC & NETWORK MTCE- MARCH $1,800.00 2015 Invoice 130636 3/1/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 -- Wells Fargo 10100 Total - - -- -_ $1,800.00 Refer 13 FRONT/ER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 2 -20 -15 THRU & $184.45 20 -15 Invoice 4372475 2/20/2015 -399- CITY OF MOUND Payments 03/05/15 12:13 PM Page 4 CfTY OF MOUND Current Period: March 2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41920 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 2 -20 -15 THRU 3- $553.35 20 -15 Invoice 4372475 2/20/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 ....:.,.....»..»..,...._._..»,.._:.. X14 Wells Fargo 10100 Total �..., �. ..,....»,...�- .�.,..........,,. _ ____.— $737.80 Refer G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -2 -15 $55.46 Invoice 1006732156 2/2/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -2 -15 $52.85 Invoice 1006732156 21212015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -2 -15 $64.04 Invoice 1006732156 2/2/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 1 -5 -15 $115.75 Invoice 1006732156 2/2/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 1 -26 -15 $64.99 Invoice 1006720707 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 1 -26 -15 $61.11 Invoice 1006720707 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 1 -26 -15 $71.03 Invoice 1006720707 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E602-49450-230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 1 -26 -15 $344.20 ! Invoice 1006720707 1/26/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -9 -15 $57A8 Invoice 1006743546 2/9/2015 Cash Payment E 60149400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -9 -15 $64.22 Invoice 1006743546 2/9/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -9 -15 $63.52 Invoice 1006743546 2/9/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 2 -9 -15 $77.50 Invoice 1006743546 219/2015 Project 15.3 Transaction Date 2/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,092.15 Refer _ 15 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 2 -23 -15 LIQUOR $96.96 STORE Invoice 1006766365 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 2 -09 -15 PARKS $36.93 Invoice 1006743547 21912015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 2 -9 -15 PARKS $71.84 Invoice 1006743547 2/9/2015 Transaction Date � --- Wells Fargo 10100 Total $205.73 Refer _ 16 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -395 Gopher One -Call FEB 2015 LOCATES $40.70 Invoice 133193 2/28/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -395 Gopher One -Call FEB 2015 LOCATES $40.70 Invoice 133193 2/28/2015 - -- - Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -- - - ---- $81 40 Refer 17 H& L MESAB/ AGGREGATE CONS'.m "` Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply PLOW BLADES, CUTTING EDGES, CURB $2,647.54 RUNNER --I" Invoice 92734 2/4/2015 -400- CITY OF MOUND 03/05/15 12:13 PM Payments Page 5 CITE` OF MOUND Current Period: March 2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply PLOW BLADES, CUTTING EDGES, CURB $1,323.76 RUNNER, BOLTS Invoice 92734 2/4/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -221 Equipment Parts PLOW BLADES, CUTTING EDGES, CURB $1,323.76 RUNNER, BOLTS Invoice 92734 2/4/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts PLOW BLADES, CUTTING EDGES, CURB $1,323.76 RUNNER, BOLTS Invoice 92734 2/4/2015 Transaction Date 313/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,618.82 Refer 39 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -331 Use of personal auto REIMB MILEAGE- CITY BUSINESS- DRUG $28.75 TASK FORCE & WATERSHED MTGS K. HANSON FEB 2015 Invoice 031015 3/5/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells REIMB DSL INTERNET HOME LINE- K. $47.50 HANSON JAN 2015 Invoice 031015 315/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $76.25 Refer 41 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $12718 FEB 2015 Invoice 1000053387 1/6/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $790.26 ADMINISTRATION FEE - FEB 2015 Invoice 1000053387 1/6/2015 Transaction Date 3/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.54 Refer _ 1.8 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _- _ Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL PLANNING $348.80 SVCS JAN 2015 Invoice 007- 001 -80 2/16/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23318 GALWAY- VACATION PC #14 GALWAY VACATION PC #14 -28 J. ROCK- $124.50 PLANNING SVC JAN 2015 Invoice 007- 005 -75 2116/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD MISSION WOODS SUBDV- 14 -15, 14 -16 $560.25 FAIRFIELD RD PLANNING SVCS JAN 2015 Invoice 007 - 005 -75 2/1612015 Cash Payment G 101 - 233192001 ARBOR LAKES PC #14 2001 ARBOR LN- PC #14 -27 PLANNING SVCS $41.50 JAN 2015 Invoice 007 - 005 -75 2/16/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23272 SALITERMAN: #13 -04 to #1 LOST LAKE PUD -THE LANDINGS PLANNING $20.75 SVCS JAN 2015 Invoice 007- 005 -75 2/16/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,095.80 Refer 19 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101- 41110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $12.50 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $125.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 -401- CITY OF MOUND .. Payments 03/05/15 12:13 PM Page 6 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: March 2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $625.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $0.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $375.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $4,571.25 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $2,650.00 Invoice 29226 2/1812015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $7,434.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $0.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $2,200.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $2,650.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $1,750.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 1ST INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $0.00 Invoice 29226 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -361 General Liability Ins VOLUNTEER ACCIDENT INS- CITY, FIRE & HRA 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 $657.00 Invoice 29348 2/24/2015 Transaction Date Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23,049.75 Refer _ 20 MARINE C_OVE_RS AND INTERIORS _ Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies FIRE BOAT COVER $975.00 Invoice 1064 2/21/2015 PO 24282 Transaction Date 3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total "..» .o-, a,.,=,,, ....... a.,.....,....w...,.. .,m,�.,«......_..,,.,.....,w... $975.00 Refer,.�._... ...,,...,.. .�..,...,.,,.�........, 21 MEDIACOM >,..�... Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 2 -16 -15 THRU 3- $95.90 15 -15 Invoice 031015 2/6/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - $95.90 Refer 22 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL_WASTE Gash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES APRIL 2015 $64,157.17 Invoice 0001041669 3/3/2015 -- Transaction Date Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64,157.17 Refer 23 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH -402- CITY OF MOUND 03/05/15 12:13 PM Payments Page 7 G[1 Y OF N40UND Current Period: March 2015 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -37170 State fee - Water 1ST QTR 2015 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,793.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Invoice 03102015 2/11/2015 Transaction Date 3/4/2015 a Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,793.00 Refer _ 24 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA��m�W'� 3333.. _. 9333 9339 —__ - - - - - -- ' Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $77.50 WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 742425 2/16/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 ,13,11.. - 1333. 3333 Wells Fargo 10100 Total _..._._. . __ ......- F .. ... $77.50 Refer 37MNSPECT ............... ... .�- 3339. -,-. ., . - Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees FEB 2015 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES $5,673.92 Invoice 6502 3/4/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments FEB 2015 - ELECTRICAL STATE - $70.00 SURCHARGE FEE CREDIT Invoice 6502 3/4/2015 Cash Payment R 101 -42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee FEB 2015 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PERMIT - $224.00 FEE CREDITS Invoice 6502 3/4/2015 Transaction Date 2/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 9393. $5,379.92 Refer 25 OFFICE DEPOT _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER -CITY HALL $119.08 Invoice 756333560001 2/19/2015 PO 23460 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies LASER JET TONER CARTRIDGES- HWS $92.46 Invoice 756333559001 2/19/2015 PO 23460 Transaction Date 3/4/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $211.54 Refer 38 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic PEST CONTROL SVC- HWS $50.02 Invoice 4690245 2/6/2015 Transaction Date 2/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.02 Refer 26 R.C. ELECTRIC, — INCORPORATED - ' Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -400 Repairs & Maintenance CONVERT COOLER DOOR LIGHTING TO $7,360.00 LED STRIP LIGHTS- HWS Invoice 4595 2/17/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -400 Repairs & Maintenance XCEL ENERGY REBATE- $100 PER 23 - $2,300.00 COOLER DOORS - LIGHTING EFFICIENCY CONVERSION TO LED - HWS Invoice 4595 2/17/2015 Transaction Date 3/4/2015 - --- Wells Fargo 10100 Total - ----- $5,060.00 Refer 27 RICOH_U_SA, INC. Cash Payment Payment E 222 -42260 -202 Duplicating and copying FIRE DEPT COPIER RENTAL FEE 12 -13.14 $147.96 THRU 3 -12 -15 Invoice 94211982 2/20/2015 Transaction Date 3/312015 .......� .. ...... . Wells Fargo 10100 Total 3333 .. ,.. , - .. $147.96 ,.. - -. 3333... Refer 34 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORA T/ _ , _. Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 2 MICROSOFT OFFICE STD- 2013 MULTIPLE $485.58 WINDOWS PLATFORMO- FIRE DEPT Invoice B03068309 2/16/2015 PO 24586 -403- CITY OF MOUND 03/05/15 12:13 PM Cash Payment Page 8 Payments 2/21/2015 CITY OF MOUND E 401- 43114 -300 Professional Srvs Current Period: March 2015 2/1412015 Cash Payment E 401 -43110 -300 Professional Srvs Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 4 MICROSOFT WINDOWS 8.1 PRO $488.00 UPGRADE- FIRE DEPT 2/25/2015 Invoice 803068093 2/16/2015 PO 24584 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 3 MICROSOFT WINDOWS 8.1 PRO $366.00 UPGRADE- PUB W KS Invoice 803068093 2/16/2015 PO 24584 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 41920 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft 1 MICROSOFT WINDOWS 8.1 PRO $122.00 UPGRADE- CITY HALL -LASER FICHE Invoice 803068093 2/16/2015 PO 24584 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,461.58 Refer 1 STAN MORGAN & ASSSOC. INC. Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -400 Repairs & Maintenance COOLER PARTS- NYLA TRAK 7, ROLL $1,277.18 TRACKS & DIVIDERS W/ HARDWARE HWS Invoice 58274 2/1312015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,277.18 Refer _ 28 SUBURBAN RATEAUTHORITV -" Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2015 MEMBERSHIP ASSESSMENT $800.00 $400/VOTE Invoice 03102015 2/2312015 Transaction Date 3/4/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $800.00 Refer 36 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising CUSTOMER APPREC WINE SALE AD- HWS $384.96 2 -21 -15 Invoice 191065 2/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -328 Employment Advertising SALESCLERK HELP WANTED AD -HWS 2 -25- 15 Invoice 194272 3/1/2015 Transaction Date 3/4/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 2 SUN PATRIOTNEWSPAPER -CITY - Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD LEGAL NTCE-- MISSION WOODS MAJ SUBDV PRELIM PLAT PUB HEARING 2 -21 -15 Invoice 190354 2/21/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41110 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 190355 2/21/2015 Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 345982 2/1412015 Cash Payment E 401 -43110 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 345982 2114/2015 Transaction Date 2/25/2015 Refer 29 TRUSTED EMPLOYEES Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -430 Miscellaneous LEGAL NTCE - -ORD 01 -2015 AMEND CHPT 14 KEEPING OF ANIMALS 2 -21 -15 2014 STREET PROD ADV FOR BIDS- STREET CONSTRUCTION, CURB & GUTTER PIN 14-01 Project P W 1401 2014 STREET PROJ ADV FOR BIDS- STREET CONSTRUCTION, CURB & GUTTER PIN 1402 Project PW 1402 Wells Fargo 10100 Total PRE - EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND CHECK - K. KELLY $161.00 - -- $545.96 $46.26 $161.91 $69.72 $69.72 $347.61 $15.00 Invoice 0220157252S 3/2/2015 Transaction Date 3/4/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 30 ULINE .m. •; a r Payments CITY OF [MOUND 03/05/15 12:13 PM Page 9 Current Period: March 2015 z6"" Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -210 Operating Supplies ECONOMY TOILET TISSUE- CITY HALL & $173.12 FIRE BLDG Invoice 65352706 2/17/2015 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 65352706 2117/2015 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Refer 31 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 445652762 2113/2015 ECONOMY TOILET TISSUE- CITY HALL & $173,12 FIRE BLDG Wells Fargo 10100 Total $346.24 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26/15 $147.52 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26/15 DEPOT $61.76 BLDG ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26/15 $3,635.08 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23114 TO 1/26/15 $2,551.42 ELECTRIC SVC - 12123/14 TO 1/26/15 $4,020.38 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26/15 $1,431.03 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1126/15 $2,052.41 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26/15 $2,052.41 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26/15 $711.79 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26/15 $2,582.04 ELECTRIC SVC - 12/23/14 TO 1/26115 $42.85 Transaction Date 3/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $19,288.69 Refer 35 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 447055877 2/26/2015 Transaction Date 1/8/2015 ELECTRIC SVC 1 -26 -15 THRU 2/25/15 CARLOW RD LIFT STATION $0.00 SHORELINE - COMMERCE STREET LIGHTS 1- $60.14 26 -15 THRU 2/25/15 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.14 -405- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 285 MOUND HRA 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND I Current Period: March 2015 tin _su'ovie 10100 Wells Fargo $33,466.99 $30,295.30 $0.00 $2,582.04 $324.67 $17,879.11 $75,379.12 $11,094.22 $0.00 $171,021.45 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $171,021.45 Total $171,021.45 EI- 03105/15 12:13 PM Page 10 CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 031015HWS Payments Payments Current Period: March 2015 User Dollar Amt $86,093.19 Computer Dollar Amt $86,093.19 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS Invoice 91605600 2/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 91610600 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- T- WOLVES KG Invoice 91609600 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 91609600 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- GIFT WINE & GLASS COLLECTION Invoice 91609600 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX 03/05/15 11:28 AM Page 1 $117.12 $71.48 $36.00 $98.00 $9.99 $69.60 Invoice 91609600 2/23/2015 LIQUOR $2,409.60 Transaction Date 315/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $402,19 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ $31.5C Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,044.75 Invoice 47081600 212012015 LIQUOR $4,789.20 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.30 Invoice 47081600 2/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,230.30 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $16.79 Invoice 47085500 2/19/2015 $31.95 Invoice 199012 2/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $274.00 Invoice 47024600 2/17/2015 $330.72 Invoice 199012 2/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT -$1.55 Invoice 47024600 2/17/2015 Total $362.67 Refer 12 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $764.71 Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,409.60 Invoice 47203100 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $31.5C Invoice 47203100 312/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,789.20 invoice 47103200 2/23/2015 Transaction Date 2/25/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,230.30 Refer _ 4 BERN/CKS_BE_VERAGES AN_D_VEN _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $31.95 Invoice 199012 2/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $330.72 Invoice 199012 2/25/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $362.67 Refer 12 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX- COCA COLA PRODUCTS $177.88 Invoice 0188053811 3/3/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Farg_407_ 10100 Total $177.88 CITY OF MOUND 03/05/1511:28 AM Payments aPayments Page 2 CIT'if OF MOUND Invoice 791243 Current Period: March 2015 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo Refer, Refer 5 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $647.80 Invoice 1140801 2/25/2015 Invoice 791758 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $135.00 Invoice 105968 3/3/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $782.80 Refer 7 DAYD/STR/BUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2334227 $119.00 Invoice 791243 2/19/2015 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo Refer, Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale $1,51970 Invoice 791758 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $298.00 Invoice 791809 2/27/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,384.50 Invoice 792709 3/312015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,321.20 Refer, 8 GRAPEBEGINNINGS, INCORPORA - "'- Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $228.00 Invoice 178195 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 178195 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $192.00 Invoice 178408 2/27/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 178408 2/27/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $429.00 Refer 9 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED - _�--- "�� - -- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $760.75 Invoice 747947 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $458.85 Invoice 750189 3/4/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,219.60 _ 10 J & N SPECIALTY IMPORTS, L_L_C _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,003.08 Invoice 1084 2/28/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,003.08 Refer 11 ✓J TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2334230 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 2334232 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2334227 2/24/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo Refer, 13 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2334269 3/3/2015 _4.08_ $27.60 - $30.00 $2,831.44 10100 Total _ - -_ $2,829.04 $1,294,93 CITY OF MOUND 03/05/15 11:28 AM Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: March 2015 1 .i,F_'x3'„� „>:; x'° ...,�;C�u4":� • Ytd'�ii�"�TS �s�'% %, r. ....::: ;n r... Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $38.80 Invoice 2334270 3/3/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,333.73 Refer 15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,056.87 Invoice 5102502 2/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,626.90 Invoice 5102503 2/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $10.00 Invoice 515659 2/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$7,58 Invoice 515661 2120/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $11.03 Invoice 515658 2/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $3.45 Invoice 515660 2/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $49.65 Invoice 512329 1/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$9.71 Invoice 512331 1/23/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,592.35 Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $94.49 Invoice 5097331 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,917.04 Invoice 5097329 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,527.51 Invoice 5097330 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $379.21 Invoice 5097333 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $547.90 Invoice 5097332 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,885.20 Invoice 5107783 3/412015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,432.95 Invoice 5107784 3/4/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,784.30 Refer 16 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 2 -19 -15 $316.10 Invoice 30891 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 2 -16 -14 $59.45 Invoice 29624 2/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 2 -26 -14 $314.65 Invoice 30917 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 2 -23 -14 $62.35 Invoice 30899 2/23/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $752.55 Refer 17 MINNEHAHA SUILDING MAINTENA _ -409- CITY OF M0UND j �( Payments 03/05/15 11:28 AM Page 4 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: March 2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 1 -12 Invoice 928034755 2/1/2015 -15 $65.19 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 ................... a...,... .,..._ .18 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .e- .�....w.a.,..,�........�:.>y $65.18 Refer MOUND, CITY OF .,.......�,..,. ....w�,a-...�..'""""'m "`" °" '"` "'•"°°° Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -382 Water Utilities WATER SERVICE 1 -2 -15 THRU 2 -2 -15 HWS Invoice 031015 2/20/2015 $52.27 Transaction Date 5 2015 _._.._ 11-1.1-11- . _ ...I,.._ Total-- Wells Fargo 10100 Total ._ .............. . „„.w, -_. „. __.--- $52 27 19.P...- Refer DS AUST /S AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8487933 2/23/2015 $215.00 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8487933 2/23/2015 $5.25 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $94,01 Invoice 8487944 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8487944 2/23/2015 $2'25 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 8488417 2/25/2015 - $37.01 Transaction Date 5 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $279.50 Refer 20 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $884.55 Invoice 8488977 3/2/2005 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 8488977 3/2/2005 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 To tal $894.55 Refer 22 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,212.90 Invoice 2748934 2/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,804.85 Invoice 2748934 2/25/2015 Transaction Date 2/25/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Tots! 1 �� $3,017.75 Reefer _ 21 PHILLIPS WINE AND_ _SPIR_ITS, _ _ _INC _ _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $690.00 Invoice 2745571 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $751.80 Invoice 2745572 2/18/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 -. _.._..-- Wells Fargo 10100 Total - -- _ $1,441.80 Refer _ 23 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,359.45 Invoice 2752391 3/4/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $204.60 Invoice 2752391 3/4/2015 Transaction Date Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,564.05 Refer 24 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, IN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 2 -28 -15 $15.00 EDITION Invoice SO438185 1/27/2015 -410- CITY OF MOUND 03/05/1511:28 AM Page 5 Payments C[TY OF [SOUND Current Period: March 2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 27 SOUTHERN WINE 8 SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE - $2,312.00 Invoice 1261021 3/5/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $688,11 Invoice 1261022 3/5/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $88.00 Invoice 1261023 3/5/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo �� -�� 10100 Total - -�� ♦� $3,088.11 Refer 26 SOUTHERN WINE B SPIRITS OF -�� _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,740.00 Invoice 1258754 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,246.65 Invoice 1258753 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $73.76 Invoice 1258755 2/26/2015 _ Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,060.41 Refer 25 SOUTHERN WINE 6 SPIRITS OF M - Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,145.20 Invoice 1256473 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $89,91 Invoice 1256475 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,207.80 Invoice 1256474 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $89.88 Invoice 9052489 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $90.00 Invoice 9052490 2/23/2015 - — --- -- - -- — Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,263.03 Refer 29 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $29.50 Invoice 878025 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $791.77 Invoice 878026 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $259.90 Invoice 00751446 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $119.00 Invoice 00772679 2/27/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $38.40 Invoice 876771CR 2/17/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $641.97 Refer 28 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $99,90 Invoice 879287 3/3/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $165.55 Invoice 879288 3/3/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 879289 3/312015 BEER _411- $3,192.62 CITY OF MOUND 03/05/15 11:28 AM Payments Page 6 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: March 2015 R, .. `t,-»{1`tl'. R4�`, xa Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,458.07 Refer 30 TKO WINES_, INC. _- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $480.00 Invoice 1093 2/26/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 A Wells Fargo Total $480.00 Refer 32 VINOCOP/A, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $677.28 Invoice 0118444 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.50 Invoice 0118444 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $576.00 Invoice 0118443 2/19/201.5 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $9.00 Invoice 0118443 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale BEER $47.04 Invoice 0119154 3/3/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0119154 3/3/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,324.82 Refer _ 31 V_INOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $72.08 Invoice 0118873 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0118873 212612015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $86.24 Invoice 0118875 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0118875 2/26/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165.82 Refer 34 WEBLEASE USA Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY WEBS ITE SVC 2 -15 -15 THRU 3 -14- $99.00 15 HWS Invoice 66332 2/15/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer _ _33 33 WINE COMPANY- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $832.00 Invoice 385536 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $13.20 Invoice 385538 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $632.00 Invoice 386117 2/2612015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $9.90 Invoice 386117 2/26/2015 ^Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,487.10 Refer 35 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $911.00 Invoice 7018853 2/18/2015 _412_ CITY OF MOUND 03/05/1511:28 AM gg Page 7 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: March 2015 T...t�K,,,Y, Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $753.00 Invoice 7019753 2/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609. 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $60.00 Invoice 701655 2/18/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo ....,....... � 10100 Total w...,.. ,.. $1,604.00 Refer 36 WINE MERCHANTS- ..- .e.�..„.W._,..�....�,..�..�. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $653.00 Invoice 7020665 3/4/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $200.00 Invoice 701574 2/11/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $23.00 Invoice 7020666 3/4/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $476.00 Refer 37 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,454.75 Invoice 1090368889 3/4/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $221.34 Invoice 1090368890 3/4/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $23.10 Invoice 1090368931 3/4/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $999.55 Invoice 1090362863 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,517.60 Invoice 1090365496 2/25/2019 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,216.34 Refer 38 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _ _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,023.00 Invoice 1080290069 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $612.35 Invoice 1080290068 2/1912015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,114.23 Invoice 1080292683 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $862.00 Invoice 1080292754 2/2612015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,611.58 Refer 39 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _ Cash Payment E 60949750.253 Wine For Resale WINE $566.00 Invoice 1080295627 3/512015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,235.43 Invoice 1080295626 3/5/2015 Transaction Date 3/5/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,801.43 -413- Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $86,093.19 Total $86,093.19 -414- CITY OF MOUND 03/05/1511:28 AM Page 8 Payments CITY OF € OUND Current Period: March 2015 ...r Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $86,093.19 $86,093.19 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $86,093.19 Total $86,093.19 -414- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 19, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota held a special meeting workshop on Thursday, February 19, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Council Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid; Council Members Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie, Jennifer Peterson and Ray Salazar. Council Members absent: None. Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Response plan for the Centennial Building when under threat by Run /bomb Hanson reviewed the memo from Chief Farniok. Discussion ensued and it was requested that a simulation be developed by the Orono Police Department in order to train the Council on what to do when under threat by gun or bomb. 3. Response plan for tornado and fire Hanson emphasized the rally point for the Centennial Building in the event of a fire is at the lower parking lot by the Skate Park /Wolner Field in order to facilitate a head count. Hanson said in the event of a tornado, people either have to go to the basement or leave. Hanson said the doors will remain unlocked so that people can take refuge. 4. Chart of accounts Pausche discussed the information included in the packet and encouraged the Council to ask questions on claims in advance of the meetings, when possible, to allow time for research. 5. Redevelopment Peterson stated that a meeting was held the previous night to discuss www.hoodstarter.com which may be a tool to help market vacant properties. Wegscheid said he would like to see Westonka Community and Commerce run it. Gesch said she definitely feels it should be citizen driven. Hanson asked about the impact of zoning on properties and Peterson said she believes it could be included in the property information. Hanson passed out a chronology of community development projects since 1998. Hanson stated the parking ramp was a "build it and they will come" philosophy and that it is part of the infrastructure that is necessary to attract developers, even though people often question its purpose. -415- Mound City Council Minutes — February 19, 2015 Hanson said she feels the vacant buildings are an opportunity since it is cheaper to rehab than build from scratch. Hanson stated she is pleased with the residential minor subdivisions that have taken place even though Mound is considered fully built. Gillispie asked for a development timeline and photos to be added to the website so that people can be referred to it. Hanson said Jameson Smieja said the majority of people he talked to during the campaign were not aware of what has been accomplished. Peterson said she feels it is more important to focus on what is next. Salazar spoke about the Williams store owner and the fact that he is tryingto pair him up with an interested party. Gillispie said people need to understand that the City is not involved in private sector business. Hanson said the City cannot do anything about unsightly buildings if they are not breaking any of the code /laws. 6. 'Biking City' designation Peterson said that there is an organization that helps cities become a designated "Bicycle Friendly Community." Gillispie asked what is the goal. Peterson said Rochester and Minneapolis received the designation and it helps to create an awareness /positive image of the city. Salazar asked about the cost. Wegscheid questioned what would be mandated and /or required to be designated, but thought it would be a healthy exercise to explore it. Hanson said this would require county participation since they control the main roads and noted that the collector and non - arterial streets are 30 MPH per state statute. Peterson said she hopes it would focus more on the benefits of the regional trail and that she will look more into it and report back. Keeping City Council Members updated A. When content is not confidential B. When content is confidential C. Workshops Wegscheid said he wanted to discuss the work on committees and the issue that arises when something has been under discussion but not all members are informed. Gillispie noted examples including the Minnetrista water treatment and Public Works storage discussions. Gillispie noted that residents often approach council members on topics and it does not seem acceptable to be in the dark. Wegscheid suggested the council be informed when a committee is created to explore a topic so that members can respond to inquiries and refer residents to the appropriate source. Hanson said reports by committee members could be made as part of the regular council meetings. Hanson said she has learned to ask for requests in writing so the official record is made and the Council can be fully aware of the City's response /position. Gesch said she would like a basic understanding of the issue, without being too detailed, and the name of whom she should refer the public to in the event she is questioned on the topic. -416- Mound City Council Minutes — February 19, 2015 Hanson said in the past the Mayor and Planning Commission Council Liaison were selected to attend preliminary meetings with developers. Discussion ensued and Gillispie expressed an interest in participating unless one of the other council members helped recruit the developer and wanted to participate instead. Everyone was in agreement with that approach. Wegscheid said he asked to discuss the willingness of members to participate in workshops because he feels it facilitates more interaction compared to the formal meeting. Gillispie agreed. Salazar said he wants to remain as transparent as possible and that any special meeting should be called for at the regular Council meeting and the purpose stated. Wegscheid would like to find a way that is acceptable to participate in community events without considering it an official meeting. Discussion ensued and it was agreed that if the event was hosted by another organization, it is just important that city business is not discussed and that the potential for a quorum be noticed 3+ days in advance. Salazar requested better notice than the minimum requirement. Hanson mentioned cities often hold off -site retreats with a professional facilitator. Hanson said the special meeting agendas don't have to be voted upon but that they must be specific and no other topics discussed. g. City Code updates A. Public Gathering Permits and Fee Schedule B. General update of certain other sections Gillispie said she has previously shared Delano's fee structure for public gathering permits and it was agreed that she will work with Staff to bring a proposal forward to the full council. 9. Meeting conduct /protocols Hanson said she included excerpts of the Minnesota Mayor's Handbook on meeting protocols so that everyone can be on the same page and help facilitate the meeting. Hanson cautioned members to be aware of their body language, including lounging in their seat or rolling eyes. Hanson said a past facilitator encouraged the council members to use "when you do this ... it make me feel this way..." Gesch asked that council members wait for the Mayor to comment on an issue and then for him to ask each member if they would like to contribute. Gesch said she thought everyone should wait their turn and try not to repeat what has already been said. Hanson asked if members want to adopt a more formal approach in meetings, like using titles instead of first names. Wegscheid said it was suggested to him to encourage the use of his title as Mayor to maintain respect for the office. 10. other Gillispie requested something in the Code with regard to rentals that spells out the responsibilities of the owners. Gillispie said the Building Inspector told her that of the cities with rental licensing language, no two are alike. Wegscheid said he thinks it will be a valuable exercise but cautions about overreaching. It was decided that Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Gillispie will review past work on the subject and draft something to be considered by the full council. -417- Mound City Council Minutes— February 19, 2015 Gillispie asked about the use of Facebook and that she did not see many cities using it. Gillispie cautioned about taking it on and thought a more formal website was a better use of resources. Peterson asked about use of blogging or at least keeping the content of the website more fresh. Hanson said Staff is currently working with a consultant to improve the website and marketing materials for prospective developers and community outreach overall. 3. Adiourn MOTION by Gillispie, seconded by Gesch to adjourn at 9:11 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 24, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, February 24, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Heidi Gesch, Ray Salazar, Kelli Gillispie, and Jennifer Peterson Members absent: None. Others present: Director of Finance /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, City Attorney Melissa Manderschied, Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Katie Morford, Senator David Osmek, Troy Tasche, Kevin Ehlinger, Chuck Henke, Peter Meyer, Libby Lucas, Jennifer Frizzler. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Pausche requested item 4D be added to the consent agenda. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $1,027,980.04 B. Approve minutes Feb 10, 2015 regular meeting C. Approve permit applications for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church Knights of Columbus On -Sale Liquor Permit, with fees paid 1. Shrimp Fry, Mar 6, 2015 2. Shrimp Fry, Mar 20, 2015 D. (added) RESOLUTION NO. 15 -15: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT PROPOSAL FOR GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION SERVICES FOR POTENTIAL CITY PROJECT — WATERMAIN LOOP FROM BARTLETT BOULEVARD TO TYRONE LANE -419- Mound City Council Minutes — February 24, 2015 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. Troy Tasche, 5207 Sulgrove Road, stated contractors working February 11th on new construction at 5240 Sulgrove and 5239 Seabury caused the new road to crack. Tasche said he wanted to bring it to the attention of the council and asked that it be investigated. 6. Visit by Senator David Osmek Senator Osmek said he is conducting his annual visit of cities in Senate District 33. Senator Osmek handed out new cards and mentioned that he was elected Minority Whip which is mainly an administrative role that ensures a logical flow to proceedings. Senator Osmek was also made ranking member of the Energy and Environment Commission. Senator Osmek highlighted accomplishments from 2014, including getting the Mound TIF bill passed. Senator Osmek said his district is a split between urban and rural interests. Senator Osmek summarized a bill he has proposed for Met Council reform, including the representatives having to get resolutions of support from districts being represented and staggering the terms to allow for continuity. Senator Osmek handed out Bill S.F. No 80 that proposes that MNDOT could get permission from cities or counties for projects, which would significantly impact the influence of cities. Osmek emphasized how important it is to watch these proposals closely. Discussion ensued about the Met Council proposal to clarify what was being proposed. Osmek clarified that it is so the cities can endorse the Governor's appointee prior to the Senate confirmation. Upon confirmation of a four -year term, any city can propose a recall but other cities would have to agree. Manderschied asked if city size was weighted for districts where cities are very different in size. Senator Osmek said he did consider it but felt weighting did not provide enough benefit to further complicate the process. Senator Osmek said the next redistricting is in 2022. Senator Osmek stated he opposes the Governor's proposed pay increases for state employees and the new Senate office building. 7. Dan Faulkner City Engineer of Bolton & Menk, requesting discussion/action on proposal by Westonka School District for sidewalk connecting to Grandview Middle School sidewalk Faulkner gave a summary of the Grandview Street Improvement Project to date, including discussion on adding a sidewalk option. Faulkner said the cost of a sidewalk the length of Grandview would have increased the assessment approximately $1,000 per unit, with the total cost of adding a sidewalk estimated at $110,000. The Westonka School District asked that a sidewalk be added for the one -block segment between Bellaire and Commerce with the school district and city sharing in the cost. Faulkner reviewed the three options presented in the packet and stated he created the scenarios assuming the three -way stop would remain at Bellaire and Grandview. Faulkner presented the pros and cons of each option, including concerns if cars backed up at stop sign, an east bound car may not see students crossing at the mid -block crossing. Faulkner stated that the three private homes who would be impacted by a road shift had not been noticed. Faulkner noted bikes are allowed on sidewalks in neighborhoods, just not business districts. Charles Henke, 5357 Grandview Blvd, said he lives at the corner of Grandview and Bellaire and that the majority of students cut across his lawn to go south on Bellaire. Henke noted people are not obeying the no parking and do not enter signage. Henke said he is against a sidewalk on the south side and that a sidewalk on the north side would make more sense. Gillispie Mound City Council Minutes — February 24, 2015 asked if he has observed a lot of students walking and Henke said probably 20 to 30. Henke said most of the pedestrian traffic goes toward Bellaire and not down Grandview. Libby Lucas, 5664 Grandview, asked why the sidewalk would extend to her house and Wegscheid said the thought is to have students cross at controlled crosswalks at the three -way intersection. Lucas said there are not that many students walking, perhaps 10. Peter Meyer, 5754 Sunset Road, said Grandview does get icy with a slope. Meyer said the school was built in the 1950's and, as far as he knows, there have been no accidents. Meyer said if it was a safety issue, he would support it, but he does not feel it is. Jennifer Frizzler, 5777 Grandview Blvd, said she is confused about widening the road and then narrowing it because back -ups occur with parents dropping kids off and she is concerned a curve would complicate the situation. Gesch asked if the center of the road would line up before and after Bellaire and Faulkner said it would not but that it would transition and not be abrupt. Faulkner said that all three options involve a shift in the road. Wegscheid pointed out that it just seems that the risk is being shifted and that safety would require crossing at the intersections, not mid - block. Wegscheid clarified that residential property owners would not be assessed for the sidewalk requested by the school district. Wegscheid clarified the change in the center line would be transitional. Salazar said he visited with the three neighbors on the south side and said that all three were in favor of a sidewalk on the north side and that no one expressed a concern about losing frontage due to the shift in the road. Salazar said that in the interest of public safety, he is in support of adding the sidewalk. Salazar said he witnessed an event at the school that demonstrated there are parking issues and commotion. Gesch said she struggles because she feels the safety issue is solved at Commerce and that the bigger issue is the Bellaire area. Gesch suggested a crosswalk at Bellaire and Grandview and adding a short sidewalk on the north side to connect to the school sidewalk. Gesch said other larger safety issues exist if people are letting their kids jump out of the cars mid - block. Gillispie stated she never saw a lot of pedestrians during the busy time when she has been in the area. Wegscheid requested that the council start to review the options. Option 1 to create a south side sidewalk was eliminated by consensus. Option 3 to widen the street and create a pedestrian shoulder was eliminated because it was seen as an inadequate solution for the cost. Wegscheid said the original Option 2 is a sidewalk on north side, but that Gesch has proposed a modified Option 2 that includes adding a crosswalk at the three -way intersection, adding a sidewalk on the north side from Bellaire to the school sidewalk, and not widening the road. Discussion ensued. The council discussed costs and agreed the school district should be responsible for any costs. MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to direct staff to work with the school district to look at extending the existing sidewalk west to Bellaire and creating a crosswalk at the intersection. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 8. Kevin Ehlinger, Mound Westonka Rotary President, requesting discussion on -421- Mound City Council Minutes — February 24, 2015 Concept Plan proposal from M -W Rotary for the Mound Harbor District Ehlinger proposed a temporary usage project for the Auditor's Road District to increase vitality and traffic until development takes place. The Rotary, through a partnership with local business owners, would fund the project at no expense to the city. Ehlinger stated that Norlings Landscape will donate three large trees that can be moved at a later date, and Bruce Stillman, owner of Big Stone Mini Golf, will rent art sculptures for the project. Gillispie asked about the trees and whether or not they would get to the stage where they can't be relocated. Gillispie requested the responsibility for removal be clearly spelled out in writing. Salazar stated he liked the idea and would like to see it remanded back to staff and the Parks Commission. Wegscheid said the disposition of the trees and fixtures would be spelled out in an agreement. Smith said staff did some preliminary review of the space because the City uses some of the space for storage and maintains the grounds and those concerns have been conveyed to the Rotary. Smith said the agreement may need to go to both the HRA and the City Council. Smith emphasized the agreement will be written with the needs of redevelopment in mind. Gillispie asked about the size of the instruments and how transportable they are. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to remand the Rotary proposal back to staff and the Parks and Open Spaces Commission to come up with an agreement for consideration by the Council and /or HRA. All voted in favor. Motion carried. W Faulkner summarized the need to change the lift station that will be replaced in 2015 from D2 to C2. Lift station D2 would be included with the 2016 CIP /Street Project on Lynwood. Faulkner said this will be the first prepackaged lift station to be bid, but an alternate will also be bid to build with the precast concrete structure that has been used in the past for the larger stations. Faulkner reviewed the cost estimates for each alternate. Faulkner said if the project is approved the bids will be taken in April with construction in later summer. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION No. 15 -16: RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2015 LIFT STATION RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT 10. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council Members /City Manager The Mayor announced the Harbor Wine and Spirits customer appreciation wine sale. Gesch stated that the Parks Commission will be marketing the Adopt a Green Space program and will be working on grant writing. Gesch said the commission wanted the council to know there may be a match required if a grant is received. Gillispie said the annual Moonlight Trail Night is taking place on March 7tn from 6pm to 9pm and that there will be a shuttle going back and forth between the Minnetonka Drive In and Mound True Value if participants don't want to walk both ways. -422- Mound City Council Minutes — February 24, 2015 B. Minutes: C. Reports: D. Correspondence: 11. Adiourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Gillispie, to adjourn at 8:55 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine PauSChe, Clerk -423- Mayor Mark Wegscheid 4 1' Consulting Engineers & Stjrveyot -s .� 41 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 °" -- www.bolton -menk. corn March 4, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — West Three Points Blvd, Street City Project Nos. PW- 14 -01, PW -14 -02 SAP 145- 106 -003 Award of Bid Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: At the April 22, 2014 Council meeting, resolutions were adopted which: 1) rejected the one bid received for the entire length of Three Points Blvd.; 2) split Three Points Blvd. at Avocet Lane into an East and a West project; 3) Split the West project into a Utility project (bid separately) and a Street project (bid separately). One of the primary reasons for this splitting was to have a separate street project that could be bid as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) project. The MSA project is what was bid today with the following results: Contractor Amount Bid Midwest Asphalt Corporation $590,231.35 G M H Asphalt Corporation $598,317.81 Iiardrives, Inc. $664,507.49 The low bid from Midwest Asphalt Corporation was significantly below the Engineer's Estimate of $779,486. They are out of Eden Prairie and are well qualified to successfully complete this type of work. It is our recommendation that the Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — West Three Points Boulevard Street Project to Midwest Asphalt Corporation in the amount of $590,231.35. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer Ft \MOUN \C 2107130 \I_Corres\D_Docs\2015 -03 -04 Ltr to Council, W Three Pts Street Bid Award.doc DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer -424- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD STREET PROJECT (PW- 14 -01, PW- 14 -02, SAP 145 - 106 -003) WHEREAS, Resolutions, 14 -27, 14 -28, 14 -29, 14 -30 and 14 -31 were adopted by the Council on April 22, 2014 which: rejected the bid submitted on April 1, 2014 for the Three Points Boulevard Project from Commerce Boulevard to the East end; split the Three Points Boulevard project at Avocet Lane into two projects, an East Three Points Boulevard project and a West Three Points Boulevard project; authorized dividing the West Three Points Boulevard project into a Utility Improvement Project, to be bid in the fall of 2014, and a Street /Retaining Wall Improvement Project, to be bid early 2015; authorized the Bartlett Watermain improvements to be bid as a separate project; and WHEREAS, the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements - East Three Points Boulevard project was bid on June 3, 2014 and awarded to GMH Asphalt Corporation on June 10, 2014 in the amount of $1,479,671.33; and WHEREAS, the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements - West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvements project was bid on June 5, 2014 and awarded to Geislinger & Sons, Inc. on November 12, 2014 in the amount of $920,288.89; and WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements Project — West Three Points Boulevard Street improvement project, bids were received on March 4, 2015, opened and tabulated according to law, with the following bids received and complying with the advertisement: Midwest Asphalt Corporation $590,231.35 GMH Asphalt Corporation $598,317.81 Hardrives, Inc. $644,507.49 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Midwest Asphalt Corporation of Eden Prairie, MN is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Midwest Asphalt of Eden Prairie, MN, in the name of the City of Mound for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — West Three Points Boulevard Street Improvement project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by the City Council this 10`" day of March 2015. Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -4?5- MEMORANDUM Date: March 3, 2015 fo: City Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Subject: Resolution to Amend the 2014 Final Overall Budget As we prepare the 2014 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, we have identified some line item budgets that need to be either 1) moved to a different line item or 2) the budgeted amount changed to better represent the actual amount. The level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established at the fund level. The Council, under Minnesota Statutes 412.731, can modify or amend the budget resolution if funds are available and a 4/5 vote is obtained. Since the budget resolution itemizes expense appropriations, Staff is requesting Council approve the Resolution to Amend the 2014 Final Overall Budget for the funds listed. It should be noted that although both revenues and /or expenses are changing, the bottom line effect for every fund is zero. Therefore, we have met the requirement that funds are available. This is considered a house- keeping exercise in order to reduce the number of variances from budget to actual and improve the presentation of the budget details going forward. Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding these matters at (952)472 -0633. -426- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE 2014 FINAL OVERALL BUDGET WHEREAS, the final overall budget for the year 2014 was approved on December 10, 2013, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 412.731 allows the Council to amend the budget resolution if there are funds available and a 415 vote is obtained, and WHEREAS, it is desired to amend said approved budget, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the following amendments to the approved 2014 final overall budget be made as presented below with the corresponding account details as presented in Exhibit A and made a part herein. GENERALFUND General Fund APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED AMENDED AMENDED AMENDED CHG IN NET CHG IN NET REVENUE EXPENSE ASSETS REVENUE EXPENSE ASSETS 4,899,498 4,994,672 - 95,174 4,899,498 4,994,672 - 95,174 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Area Fire Service Fund 1,102,121 1,102,121 0 1,201,696 1,201,696 0 Dock Fund 169,522 176,377 -6,855 217,372 224,227 -6,855 HRA Transit District Maintenance Fund 7,541 50,800 - 43,259 7,541 50,800 43,259 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1,279,164 1,329,298 - 50,114 1,426,609 1476,723 - 50,114 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Recycling Fund 202,700 196,357 6,343 202,700 196,357 6,343 Liquor Fund 710,001 622,604 87,397 710,001 622,604 87,397 Water Fund 1,695,000 1,757,460 - 62,460 1,695,000 1,757,460 62,460 Sewer Fund 1,630,000 2,036,483 - 406,483 1,630,000 2,036,483 - 406,483 Storm Water Utility Fund 446,090 418,460 29,549 448,000 418,460 29,540 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 4,685701 5,031,364 _ - 345663 4,685,701 5,031,364 - 345,663 SUMMARY General Fund 4,899,498 4,994,672 - 95,174 4,899,498 4,994,672 - 95,174 Special Revenue Funds 1,279,184 1,329,298 - 50,114 1,426,609 1,476,723 - 50,114 Enterprise Funds 4,685,701 5,031,364 - 345,663 4,685,701 5,031,364 - 345,663 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 10,864,383 11,355,334 490,951 11,011,808 11,502,759 490,951 Adopted by the City Council this _th day of March, 2015. Attest Catherine Pausche, Clerk -427- Mayor Mark Wegscheid Exhibit A 2014 Budget Amendments Before and After by Account KIP n. Approved Amended Dept Account Description Budget Budget Net E Amount Amount Change 1. Move budget for Orono contract for police services to proper expense account code 101 42110 300 Police - Prof Services 1,583,625.00 101 42110 440 Police - Contractual Services - 1,583,625.00 0 2. Move budget for retiree health insurance to proper expense account code 101 42110 131 Police - Employer Paid Health 5,298.00 101 42110 136 Police - Post Retirement Health /Dental - 5,298.00 0 3, Adjust Fire Services budgeted revenue amounts to proper revenue account codes 222 42260 34202 Fire - Fire Protection Service Contracts 270,642.00 504,927.00 222 42260 39310 Fire - Proceeds General Obligation Bond 244,363.00 - 222 42260 39203 Fire - Transfer from Other Fund 346,165.00 360,874.00 222 42260 31010 Fire - Current Ad Valorem Taxes 83,782.00 78,920.00 222 42260 31015 Fire - Ad Valorem Taxes for Rent 157,169.00 157,400.00 Total 1,102,121.00 1,102,121.00 0 4. Add budget for the 2% State Aid Money - passthru to the Fire Relief Association (+ Rev and + Exp = 0) 222 42260 33400 Fire - State Grants and Aids (Rev) - 99,575.00 99,575.00 222 42260 124 Fire - Fire Pension Contribution (Exp) 147,000.00 246,575.00 99,575.00 0 5. Add budget for the LMCD Grant (+ Rev and + Exp = 0) 222 42260 33160 Fire -Grants from other Govt'I Units (Rev) - 4,600.00 4,600.00 222 42260 210 Fire - Operating Supplies (Exp) 19,200.00 23,800.00 4,600.00 0 6. Add budget to show Lost Lake Slip Fees Transfer to Dump Bonds Debt Svc (+ Rev and + Exp = 0) 234737 Docks - Lost Lake Slip Fees (Rev) 7,357.00 55,207.00 47,850.00 700 Docks - Transfers (Exp) - 47,850.00 47,850.00 0 KIP n. Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: March 3, 2015 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -15, 14 -16 & 15 -03 Subdivision Exemption, Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat, Zoning Variance, Subdivision Variance, and Major Subdivision -Final Plat REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, is proposing a three (3) lot major subdivision of the property located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane, Fairfield Road, and Leach Avenue. The Planning Commission and City Council reviewed a concept/sketch plan for the property in May of 2014. The applicant is requesting consideration of the following: 1) Subdivision Exemption to separate the property which includes the applicant's home is located on into two properties: one of which will remain his home and the other which will become part of the Mission Woods plat; 2) Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat; 3) Subdivision Variance to allow the construction of a public street and cul -de -sac in a 24 foot right of way, 4) Zoning Variance to allow a lot depth of 74 feet for Lot 3; and 5) Major Subdivision -Final Plat; PUBLIC HEARING City Code Section 121 -61 requires that a public hearing be held by the City Council for review of a preliminary plat. The public hearing notice was published in the Laker on February 21, 2015 and was also mailed to all affected property owners, according to Hennepin County tax records, located within 350 feet of the subject site on February 19, 2015. The notice was also posted on the City Hall bulletin board on February 17, 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at its February 3, 2015 meeting. No members of the public spoke at the required public hearing for the preliminary plat. After considering the applications, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously for approval of the preliminary plat, final plat, zoning variance, and subdivision variance. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. 123 1- 429_hird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (6 12) 338 -6838 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Subdivision Exemption A subdivision exemption is being requested to ensure that the parcel located at 5913 Fairfield Road is appropriately separated into two parcels, one of which will remain the applicant's home and the other which will be included as part of the Mission Woods plat. The subdivision exemption procedures are provided for in Sec. 121 -33(3) of the code and can be used for administrative and technical purposes where the provisions of zoning and platting are being met and a new lot is not being created. The property at 5913 Fairfield Road was two parcels prior to a lot combination for tax purposes on October 31, 2013. One parcel was the original 5913 Fairfield Road parcel, which the applicant has owned since 1995. The parcel that was combined with it was a tax forfeit parcel that was located to the west that the applicant purchased from Hennepin County. The subdivision exemption procedure will re- subdivide the parcels back to the original lot lines. The subdivision exemption procedure is being used as the other two methods provided in Sec. 121 -33 are not applicable. The action is not a minor boundary adjustment since a new boundary needs to be established. The proposed action is also not a waiver of platting as the properties involved are not returning to original lot lines from the underlying plat, but rather to the lot lines as they were prior to the lot combination in October of 2013. Park Dedication Staff has prepared an analysis of park dedication fees for this subdivision. Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by Sec. 121 -121 of the City Code. If the subdivision is approved, Staff recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. Staff recommends that the park dedication be set based on a contribution of 10% of the estimated market value of the property, which is consistent with the City's policy. City policy uses Hennepin County's estimated land market value for this determination. The table below provides the land market value for each of the properties. For the currently combined parcel, Staff has estimated the amount of the property that is to be used for the subdivision. -- Parcel ID Address Acres Land Market Value Amount Used for Subdivision Park Dedication (10% of Land Market Value 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080 Unassi ned 0.16 $ 2,000 0116 $ 200 1-24 -42 -0079 17 Unassi ned 0.25 $ 1,000 0.25 $ 100 _23- 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 5913 Fairfield Road 0.49 $ 33,500 0.245 50% $1,675 - -- Total $1,975 123 1- 430 -hird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 Timelines for Action Subdivision Applications. Minnesota Statutes require approval or denial of a subdivision request by an agency within 120 days. The major subdivision application was submitted on November 24, 2014. Minnesota Statutes Section 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 120 -day rule for the subdivision application and was determined to be November 25, 2014. The City's deadline for action on the major subdivision request is on or around March 24, 2015. Land Use Applications. Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99 requires approval or denial of a zoning request within 60 -days unless an extension is executed. The variance application was received on November 24, 2014. Minnesota Statutes Section 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule for land use applications in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99 and was determined to be November 25, 2014. The City executed a 60 -day extension for action on the variance application on January 21, 2015. The City's current deadline for action of the variance application is on or around March 24, 2015. Development Agreement As a condition of approval of the plat, city staff and the city attorney recommend that the applicant be required to enter into a development agreement with the City. The city attorney is drafting such an agreement. The resolution approving the final plat authorizes and directs city staff and consultants to prepare and enter into such a development agreement with the applicant in a form approved by the city attorney. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the requests, Staff has prepared the attached five resolutions for your consideration. 123 A.4.31_hird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION NO. 15 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR 5913 FAIRFIELD ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 15 -03 PID 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 WHEREAS, on or about February 26, 2015, the applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, submitted a request for a subdivision exemption to allow the separation of his property located at 5913 Fairfield Road into two (2) lots; and WHEREAS, Sec. 121 -33 (3) allows a subdivision exemption when the applicant is seeking an administrative or technical adjustment, the application is not contrary to zoning or platting requirements, and the request does not seek to create a new parcel; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted concurrent applications for a major subdivision - preliminary plat, zoning variance, subdivision variance and major subdivision -final plat for a subdivision called Mission Woods that involves a portion of this property; and WHEREAS, a portion of this property also includes the applicant's existing single - family home; and WHEREAS, prior to October 31, 2013, this property was comprised of the following two properties as follows: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0082 5913 Fairfield Road 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086 Address Unassigned as further depicted and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, and WHEREAS, the applicant has owned the property at 5913 Fairfield Road since 1995; and WHEREAS, the applicant subsequently purchased the former Hennepin County tax forfeit property with a PID 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086; and WHEREAS, in 2013, the applicant combined the two properties together for tax purposes as further depicted and incorporated herein as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, for the purposes of the platting of the proposed Mission Woods subdivision, the applicant seeks to separate the property back into the lots as they existed prior to October 31, 2013; and -432- WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the application and recommended approval of the subdivision exemption with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the subdivision exemption request at its March 10, 2015 meeting and determined that approval would allow the administrative separation of the property for purposes of platting the Mission Woods subdivision; anc WHEREAS, in granting approval of the subdivision exemption, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The subdivision exemption is administrative for the purposes of facilitating the platting of the Mission Woods. 2. The subdivision exemption is not contrary to zoning or platting requirements. 3. The request allows the property to be separated back into the same two parcels in the same arrangement as existed prior to combination for tax purposes on October 31, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the subdivision exemption requested by the applicant is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The legal descriptions as set forth in Exhibit A are hereby incorporated into this Resolution. 2. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with this subdivision exemption application. 3. The applicant shall record this resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that this resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolution for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. Adopted by the City Council this 10'h day of March 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -433- Exhibit A Legal Description (to be inserted) AFTER SEPARATION TO BE KNOWN AS: (to be inserted) -434- (to be inserted) Depiction -435- RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION- PRELIMINARY PLAT OF MISSION WOODS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF MEADOW LANE AND FAIRFIELD ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -15 PID 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 WHEREAS, the applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, submitted a request for a major subdivision - preliminary plat called Mission Woods to create (3) three buildable, single - family parcels; and WHEREAS, the site is located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road and involves the following parcels: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24- 42 -0120, and WHEREAS, the major subdivision - preliminary plat is being concurrently reviewed with the applicant's requests for a subdivision exemption, zoning variance, subdivision variance, and major subdivision -final plat; and WHEREAS, whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision qualifies as a major subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 of the City Code as it involves the construction of public facilities and public improvements; and WHEREAS, Sec. 121 -115 requires the subdivision to conform with the zoning provisions contained in chapter 129 and be in substantial conformance to the goals and policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code; and -436- WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the regulations. The proposed new lots meet the minimum requirements, with the exception of the lot depth for Lot 3. A zoning variance is requested for Lot 3. M WHEREAS, Sec. 121 -116 of the City Code requires all new local streets to have a right - of -way 50 feet in width and new cul -de -sacs to have a radius of 50 feet. The applicant is proposing to construct a 22 foot road in a 24 foot right -of -way and a cul -de -sac with a radius of 22 feet. A subdivision variance has been requested to address the minimum street dimension requirements; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the application and recommended approval of the major subdivision - preliminary plat with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at its February 3, 2015 meeting where all members of the public were invited to provide input; and WHEREAS, based on its review of the application, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the major subdivision - preliminary plat with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its March 10, 2015 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed subdivision; and WHEREAS, as part of its review of the subdivision request, the City Council studied the practicality of the preliminary plat taking into consideration the requirements of the City, giving particular attention to the lot arrangement, water supply, sewer disposal, drainage, present development of adjoining lands and the requirements of other official controls; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the major subdivision - preliminary plat, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as the area is guided for low density residential development. 2. The property is suitable for the single - family homes that are being proposed. -437- 3. The proposed development has adequately addressed the potential environmental impact of the subdivision. 4. The proposed development has sufficiently considered traffic impacts of the subdivision. 5. The applicant will provide public streets and utilities to serve the properties. 6. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single - family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. 7. The three new proposed single - family residential lots will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 8. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. 9. The proposed development has adequately addressed the city's development plans and policies. 10. The proposed development has adequately addressed existing easements of record. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the major subdivision- preliminary plat requested by the applicant is hereby approved with the following conditions: The preliminary plat drawing labeled as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated into this Resolution and all improvements shall be as shown on the plans or as modified under the approval of the City. 2. All conditions included in the official resolutions approving the subdivision exemption (15 -_ ), zoning variance (15 -_ ), subdivision variance (15 -_ ) and major subdivision -final plat (15- ___) shall be met. 3. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. 4. The applicant shall record this resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. Adopted by the City Council this 10`" day of March 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -439- Exhibit A ( Preliminary Plat Drawing to be Inserted) ,.M RESOLUTION NO. 1S- RESOLUTION APPROVING A ZONING VARIANCE FOR THE MISSION WOODS SUBDIVISION PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF MEADOW LANE AND FAIRFIELD ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -16 PID 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 WHEREAS, the applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, submitted a request for a zoning variance pursuant to section 129 -39 of the City Code to address the 74 -foot depth of parcel proposed as Lot 3 in the Mission Woods preliminary plat set forth In Exhibit A and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the site is located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road and involves the following parcels: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24- 42 -0120; and WHEREAS, the zoning variance is being concurrently reviewed with the applicant's requests for a subdivision exemption, major subdivision - preliminary plat, subdivision variance, and major subdivision -final plat, and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the regulations. and WHEREAS, a variance is needed for the lot depth for Lot 3; and WHEREAS, as a corner lot, the orientation of Lot 3 relative to the adjacent streets affects the assignment of lot lines and setback requirements; and Im WHEREAS, at approximately 90 feet by 74 feet, the proposed lot is well above the required minimum of 40 feet by 80 feet, and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the application and recommended approval of the zoning variance with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the application at its February 3, 2015, meeting and recommended approval of the zoning variance with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the zoning variance request at its March 10, 2015, meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner after making the following findings of fact as to practical difficulties: 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality ; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the zoning variance, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed development of this property for single - family homes is reasonable and consistent with the comprehensive plan and zoning designations for this area. 2. The proposed lot arrangement is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinances and in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood and influenced by the existing right -of -ways. 3. The variance results from the shape of the property and the need for its front to be considered Leach Avenue rather than Fairfield Road. The property is well over the 6,000 square foot lot minimum and would be conforming if the front of the lot was deemed to be Fairfield Road rather than Leach Avenue. 4. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. 5. The requested variance is the minimum needs to alleviate the practical difficulty 6. The requested variance does not confer any special privilege to the applicant. -442- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the zoning variance requested by the applicant is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The variance is approved for the property described on Exhibit B. 2_ All conditions included in the official resolutions approving the subdivision exemption (05 - ), major subdivision- preliminary plat (05 -_), subdivision variance (05---7) and major subdivision -final plat (05 -_) for the Mission Woods subdivision shall be met. 3. Applicant shall pay all fees associated with this zoning variance request. 4. The applicant shall record this resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that this resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. Adopted by the City Council this 10`" day of March 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -443- Exhibit A (Preliminary Plat Drawing to be Inserted) ,,, (Legal Description(s) to be Inserted) Exhibit B -445- RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FOR THE MISSION WOODS SUBDIVISION PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF MEADOW LANE AND FAIRFIELD ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -16 PID 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 WHEREAS, the applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, submitted a request for a subdivision variance to address the minimum street design standards proposed in the Mission Woods preliminary plat set forth in Exhibit A and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the site is located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road and involves the following parcels: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24- 42 -0120; and WHEREAS, the subdivision variance is being concurrently reviewed with the applicant's request for a subdivision exemption, major subdivision - preliminary plat, zoning variance, and major subdivision -final plat; and WHEREAS, Sec. 121 -116 of the City Code requires all new local streets to have a right - of -way 50 feet in width and new cul -de -sacs to have a radius of 50 feet; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a 22 foot road in a 24 foot right -of- way and a cul -de -sac with a radius of 22 feet because the original road right of way was platted with a width of 24 feet; and WHEREAS, the fire department evaluated the proposal and determined that the proposed design of the road and cul -de -sac for the Mission Woods subdivision is acceptable; and WHEREAS, the proposed street will be in keeping with the widths of adjacent neighborhood local streets; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the application and recommended approval of the subdivision variance with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the application at its February 3, 2015 meeting and recommended approval of the subdivision variance with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the subdivision variance request at its March 10, 2015, meeting and determined that the proposed subdivision would be in harmony with the surrounding neighborhood; and MI. WHEREAS, in granting approval of the subdivision variance, the City Council has considered the nature of the applicant's proposed use of the land and the existing use of the land in the vicinity, the number of people who reside in the area, and probably effect of the proposed variance upon traffic conditions, and hereby has found the following conditions to exist: 1. There are special conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of Sec. 121 -116 of the City Code would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. The special conditions affecting the property were not created by the applicant. 3. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity in which the property is situated and will not have an adverse effect upon traffic or traffic safety.; and 4. The granting of the variance is not be contrary to the intent of the Sec. 121 -116 of the City Code. WHEREAS, in granting approval of the subdivision variance, the City Council hereby determines that certain conditions are desirable to protect the public interest and in doing so, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The proposed project will constitute a desirable and stable city development and will be in harmony with adjacent areas. 2. The proposed streets are similar in dimension to existing streets in the neighborhood. 3. The size of the proposed infill development limits the ability of the applicant to construct streets that meet design standards. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the subdivision variance requested by the applicant is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The preliminary plat drawing labeled as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated into this Resolution and all improvements shall be as shown on the plans or as modified underthe approval of the City. 2. The subdivision variance is hereby approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit B. -447- 3. All conditions included in the official resolutions approving the subdivision exemption (05 -_), major subdivision - preliminary plat (05- _ ), zoning variance (05- ) and major subdivision -final plat (05 -_J shall be met. 4. Applicant shall pay all fees associated with this subdivision variance request. The applicant shall record this resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that this resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. Adopted by the City Council this 10'" day of March 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor IM (Insert Preliminary Plat Drawing) Exhibit A IM (Legal Description(s) to be Inserted) -450- I= • o -451- RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION -FINAL PLAT OF MISSION WOODS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF MEADOW LANE AND FAIRFIELD ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -15 PID 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 WHEREAS, the applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, submitted a request for a major subdivision -final plat called Mission Woods to create three (3) buildable, single family parcels; and WHEREAS, the site is located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road and involves the following parcels: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079, and 23- 117 -24- 42- 0120, and WHEREAS, the major subdivision -final plat is being concurrently reviewed with the applicant's requests for a subdivision exemption, major subdivision - preliminary plat, zoning variance, and subdivision variance; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the application and recommended approval of the major subdivision -final plat with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its February 3, 2015 meeting and recommended approval of the major subdivision -final plat with conditions; and WHEREAS, after holding a public hearing and its consideration and subsequent approval of the applicant's requests for a subdivision exemption, major subdivision - preliminary plat, zoning variance, and subdivision variance, the City Council reviewed the major subdivision -final plat request at its March 10, 2015 meeting and determined that the proposed plat is consistent with the plans and policies of the City; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the major subdivision -final plat, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed final plat is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The proposed final plat is in all respects consistent with the preliminary plat. 3. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. -452- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Mound that the major subdivision -final plat requested by the applicant is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The final plat drawing labeled as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated into this Resolution and all improvements shall be as shown on the plans or as modified under the approval of the City. 2. The final plat is hereby approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit B. 3. All conditions included in the official resolutions approving the subdivision exemption (15 -_ ), major subdivision - preliminary plat (15 -_ ), zoning variance (15 -_) and subdivision variance (15 -_ ) shall be met. 4. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with the final plat application. 5. The street and utility plans shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee). The applicant shall be required to submit an engineer's estimate of the proposed improvements, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee). The submittal of a cash escrow or alternate form of financial security, as deemed acceptable by the City Attorney, in the amount of 125 percent of the engineer's estimate shall also be required. Details regarding the City's review and acceptance of the street and utility plans and financial security requirements shall be included and more fully defined in a development agreement which shall be required for the project. 6. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City in a form prepared by and acceptable to the City Attorney and the applicant shall meet all requirements and conditions identified in said development agreement. All costs associated with preparation of the development agreement shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 7. Applicant shall provide an easement or a letter from the adjacent property owners allowing access to their property during street and utility construction. 8. Leach Avenue and Fairfield Road shall be signed as "No Parking." 9. Any curb, gutter, and streets that are disturbed as part of the construction process for the proposed streets and utilities shall be the responsibility of the permit holder to replace. 10. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. -453- 11. The applicant shall record the resolution(s), the final plat, the development agreement and all other required documents with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s), the final plat and all other required documents will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. 12. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 13. Payment of park dedication fees in the amount of $1,975 as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code shall be made prior to the release of the resolution(s), the final plat, the development agreement and all other required documents for recording at Hennepin County. 14. Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for each of the three (3) lots prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $6,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit, unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. 15. Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for each of the three (3) lots shall be made prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $6,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit, unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. 16. Payment of a sewer connection fee of $240.00 and a water connection fee of $240.00 for each of the new three (3) lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. 17. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the three (3) new lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 18. The applicant satisfies all items included in the Plat Opinion prepared by the City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Mound that city staff and consultants are hereby authorized and directed to enter into that certain development agreement with the applicant as described in this Resolution and to further undertake any and all other necessary and convenient steps to effectuate the intent of this Resolution. -454- Adopted by the City Council this 10`h day of March 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -455- (Insert Final Plat Drawing) Exhibit A -456- (Legal Description(s) to be Inserted) Exhibit B -457- n 2416Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55354 Phone 952- 412-0600 PAX 952402 -0620 s city Council Date: Case No. Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. PROPERTY Subject Address .> 9 / 5 FCi • tt •G�'�� - -- INFO EXISTING � {{ Lots} 5¢e Ai4attWR9' Block Subdivision LEGAL DESCRIPTION pio# Z-� j 17 Z.yi 14 2 O 1 zO plat# PROPOSED A. Lot(s) See A4 ke,� Block LEGAL DESCRIPTION I B. Lots) .Block ZONING Circle: R -1 R -1A !2-2 R -3 B -1 B -2 3-3 DISTRICT PROPERTY Are theca existing structures on the properly? yes ! no Do the existing structures campy with the zoning ordinance for setbacks, Hardcover, etc.? -yes l no APPLICANT The applicant is: owner X other— Email Name Kef-d i✓rr @O ri'c seCk Address 15q f 5 Fa i rf i" e Phone Nome 95Z -33S -8590 Wnrk Fax OWNER Name. Email (if other than applicant) Address Phone Home Work Fax. SURVEYOR! 1� Nsme Pi'o>•8 „+Oqt n:2C'r'ttct �n ')�tG:_ Bost Cfk'fS��° rin6EQriq ncp Cn+�. ENGINEER Address iDOq �'., t4( -, *� St, $^Fe Z40 - 't3urrisv�ITe, YJ4J SS33`! Phone Wont 9SL- •-i32. TUDd(J. Fax 95-Z- H3Z- 372.3 Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, crother zoning procedure for this property? QQ yes. (. ) no, if yes, list hotels�r) of application. action taken, resolution numbers) and provide bodies of resolutions. Z -Zo A la L.'alt yQ rJa9 tici. Application must be signed by alf owners of the subject property, orexplanation given why this is notthe case. I comfy that all of the statements above and statements contained In any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are Ile and accurate. I acknowledge that 1 have read all of the Information provided and that I am responsible farall costs Incurred by the City related to the processing afthis a!Z., cat, n co heart to the entry in or upon the premises desedbed in the application by any authorized oMcial.ofthe Cltyof Mound o5¢ spa g, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant Sinatu Date,(. Owner's Signature Date Subdivision Exemption Applie ion (102015) Page 4 of 4 IBM EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS PID No. 23 117 24 42 0120 Lots 6, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 2, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 7, Block 8 and that part of Lot 11, Block 8 lying between the westerly line of said Lot 6 and the easterly line of the westerly half of said Lot 7 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 5, Block 8, and that part of Lot 11, Block 8, lying westerly of the easterly line of said Lot 5 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including that part of vacated Leach Avenue lying adjacent to said Lot 5. THIS PARCEL TO BE INCLUDED IN PLAT: Lot 5, Block 8, and that part of Lot 11, Block 8, lying westerly of the easterly line of said Lot 5 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including that part of vacated Leach Avenue lying adjacent to said Lot 5. THIS PARCEL TO BE EXCLUDED FROM PLAT: Lots 6, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 2, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 7, Block 8 and that part of Lot 11, Block 8 lying between the westerly line of said Lot 6 and the easterly line of the westerly half of said Lot 7 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. -459- EXISTING PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS PID No. 23 117 24 42 0120 Lots 6, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 2, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 7, Block 8 and that part of Lot 11, Block 8 lying between the westerly line of said Lot 6 and the easterly line of the westerly half of said Lot 7 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 5, Block 8, and that part of Lot 11, Block 8, lying westerly of the easterly line of said Lot 5 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including that part of vacated Leach Avenue lying adjacent to said Lot 5. PROPOSED PARCEL SPLIT DESCRIPTIONS THIS PARCEL TO BE INCLUDED IN PLAT: Lot 5, Block 8, and that part of Lot 11, Block 8, lying westerly of the easterly line of said Lot 5 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including that part of vacated Leach Avenue lying adjacent to said Lot 5. THIS PARCEL TO BE EXCLUDED FROM PLAT: Lots 6, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 2, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 7, Block 8 and that part of Lot 11, Block 8 lying between the westerly line of said Lot 6 and the easterly line of the westerly half of said Lot 7 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. U.1 NOTICE OF A CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER MAJOR SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FOR "MISSION WOODS" SUBMITTED BY KENT FRIEDRICHSEN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Centennial Building (former City Hall), 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, March 10, 2015 to hold a public hearing to consider a Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat request from Kent Friedrichsen, for a proposed, 3 -lot, single - family subdivision, to be located south and west of the intersection of Fairfield Road and Meadow Lane, and includes the proposed extension of Fairfield Road and the improvement of Leach Avenue as a cul -de -sac. The subject property involved in the subdivision is located in the plat currently known as the "Minnesota Baptist Summer Assembly" and the name of the proposed subdivision is "Mission Woods. " In addition to the Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat, other applications will also be reviewed and discussed including, but not limited to, the following: Variance Major Subdivision -Final Plat Information regarding the application is available for viewing at City Hall during regular office hours or by appointment. All persons appearing at said hearing in reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. By: Jill Norlander, Planning and Building Inspections Published in the Laker on February 21, 2015 -461- MINUTE EXCERPT FEBRUARY 3, 2015 ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Jason Baker, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, Pete Wiechert and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, City Manager Kandis Hanson, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La), Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Cases No. 14 -15 & 14 -16 Public Hearing for Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat /Final Plat /Variances Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen Chair Penner opened the Public Hearing. Item was introduced by Rita Trapp. Applicant Kent Friedrichsen is proposing a three lot major subdivision of the property located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane, Fairfield Road and Leach Avenue. Variance approval is being requested for 2 parts of the subdivision: 1) Construction of a 22 foot street from back of curb to back of curb in a 24 -foot right -of -way; and 2) Lot depth variance for Lot 3 to allow a 74 foot depth instead of an 80 foot depth. A concept /sketch plan for this property was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2014 meeting and by the City Council at its May 13, 2014 meeting. Trapp reviewed the history of the area regarding recent land use changes affecting the neighborhood. She explained the 2 requested variances as well as storm water and parkland dedication. .Staff recommends approval of the major subdivision - preliminary plat, variances and major subdivision —final plat applications subject to conditions as listed in the planning report. Smieja asked if there was a drawing showing the depth of the lots. Trapp said it wasn't included in the packet but did locate one and demonstrated their conformity and how it was measured. Applicant Kent Friedrichsen, 5913 Fairfield Road, indicated that parking on Fairfield Road and Meadow Lane is currently restricted to one side only. Stone asked if he planned to build on the properties. Friedrichsen said he is working with a builder. After the infrastructure is in place he will finalize plans for the houses. -462- Baker asked if, when we grant a lot depth variance, they can come back and request a setback variance. Trapp said that there is always that possibility. Smith reiterated that the zoning for these lots is R -2 and is consistent with the low density requirement in the comp plan. Minimum lot size is 6000 square feet. These lots are considerably larger than required. This does not prevent someone from requesting setback variances but it has been demonstrated that a house can be built on these lots. She went on to explain the major subdivision procedures. Smieja asked about the two - family minimum lot size. Smith indicated that the two - family minimum lot size in the a R -2 District is 14,000 square feet (non - lakeshore) and if they wanted a two - family unit the lots would have to be replatted. MOTION by Bergquist, second by Gawtry, to approve with Conditions 1 -16 and Findings 1 -7 from the Staff Report MOTION carried unanimously. -463- Mk A:. n,L GIIY nl- ISOUND Fall PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: January 30, 2015 MEETING DATE: February 3, 2015 PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -15 and 14 -16 SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat and Review of Variance and Major Subdivision -Final Plat and Applications - Mission Woods LOCATION: Vicinity of Meadow Lane /Fairfield Road /Leach Avenue (unimproved) APPLICANT: Kent Friedrichsen COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING: R -2 Two - Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, is proposing a three (3) lot major subdivision of the property located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane, Fairfield Road and Leach Avenue. Variance approval is being requested for two parts of the subdivision: 1) Construction of a 22 -foot street from back of curb to back of curb in a 24 -foot right -of -way; and 2) Lot depth variance for Lot 3 to allow a 74 foot depth instead of an 80 foot depth. Planning Commissioners may recall that a concept /sketch plan for this property was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2014 meeting. The concept /sketch plan was also reviewed by the City Council at its May 13, 2014 meeting. The minutes from these meeting have been included as attachments to this report. REVIEW PROCEDURE The applications under review include the following land use and subdivision requests: ® Preliminary Plat Variances ® Final Plat .�. Subdivision Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121. The proposed lot arrangement has been determined to be a major subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (2) of the City Code as it involves the construction of public facilities, including the extension of Fairfield Road, construction of Leach Avenue, and extension of sewer and water to the proposed lots. City Code Section 121 -61 requires that a public hearing be held by the Planning Commission for review of a preliminary plat. The preliminary plat is the only one of the applicant's requests that requires a Planning Commission public hearing. As required by statute and local ordinance, the public hearing notice was published in the Laker on January 17, 2015 and was also mailed to all affected property owners, according to Hennepin County tax records, located within 350 feet of the subject site on January 20, 2015. The notice was also posted on the City Hall bulletin board on January 14, 2015. Subdivision Variance City Code Section 121 -3 contains the City's regulations for granting a variance from the subdivision regulations and are provided below: (a) The City Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in this chapter following a finding that all of the following conditions exist: (1) There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such that the strict application of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. (2) The special circumstances or conditions affecting said property were not created by the applicant. (3) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity in which said property is situated and will not have an adverse effect upon traffic or traffic safety. (4) The granting of the variance would not be contrary to the intent of the applicable ordinance. in making this finding, the Council shall consider the nature of the proposed use of the land and existing use of the land in the vicinity, the number of persons who reside or work in the area, and the probable effect of the proposed variance upon traffic conditions in the vicinity. -465- (b) In granting variances, as herein provided, the Council shall prescribe conditions that it deems desirable or necessary to protect the public interest. In making a determination, the Council shall find that: (1) The proposed project will constitute a desirable and stable city development. (2) The proposed project will be in harmony with adjacent areas. (c) The application for any variance shall be made in writing and shall be submitted to the planning staff. Said application shall include the specific variances requested, the locations of those variances, and how they vary from the provisions of this chapter. The written application shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for their advice and recommendation and the Planning Commission shall report on the provisions set forth in this section. Zoning Variance City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. in evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique tothe property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. TIMELINES FOR REVIEW AND ACTION Subdivision Applications. Minnesota statutes require approval or denial of a subdivision request by an agency within 120 days. The major subdivision application was submitted on November 24, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 120 -day rule for the subdivision application and was determined to be November 25, 2014. The City's deadline for action on the major subdivision request is on or around March 24, 2015. Land Use Applications. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 requires approval or denial of a zoning request within 60 -days unless an extension is executed. The variance application was received on November 24, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule for land use applications in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 15.99 and was determined to be November 25, 2014. The City executed a 60 -day extension for action on the variance application on January 21, 2015. The new deadline for action of the variance application is on or around March 24, 2015. SITE INFORMATION The 28,142 square foot property is currently vacant /unimproved. Historically, the property was comprised of a number of previously platted parcels and unimproved right -of -way. Over the last few years, Mr. Friedrichsen, who lives adjacent to this property at 5913 Fairfield Road, has assembled the parcels and unimproved right -of -way into the current property. In addition to purchasing properties, the applicant, in 2013, made a request to the City of Mound to vacate unimproved portions of the former Hulett Avenue right -of -way. Currently, the property lacks frontage on an improved street as the improved portion of Fairfield Road ends in the vicinity of Meadow Lane. To provide access to the proposed subdivision, the applicant will be extending Fairfield to the west within the existing right -of -way and constructing Leach Avenue to the south. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density Residential, which allows for single- family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. Density is computed area wide as opposed to an individual site. The proposed subdivision meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance. -467- Zoning The subject property is located in the R -2 Two - family residential zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code. The following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot. Based on Staff review of the proposed lot configuration, the proposed new lots meet the requirements with the exception of the required lot depth for Lot 3. The applicant has requested a variance for lot depth for Lot 3. Please see Staff's review of the variance request in the DISCUSSION section of this report. Floodplain Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.3 (Floodplain) in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on the subject property. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) of a wetland, as applicable. This will be a condition of approval for the subdivision. Wetlands Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands) from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be wetlands on the subject property. Park Land Dedication Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by Sec. 121 -121 of the City Code. If a future subdivision is approved, Staff recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. Staff recommends that the park dedication be set based on a contribution of 10% of the estimated market value of the property rather than 10% of the property. City policy uses Hennepin County's estimated land market value for this determination. Given that the parcels have only recently been assembled, City Staff will work with Hennepin County to determine the appropriate estimated land market value for this property. .: INFRASTRUCTURE Streets Access to the subdivision will be provided through Fairfield Road and Leach Avenue. The applicant will construct the extension of Fairfield Road within the existing 24 foot right -of -way. Fairfield Road will extend past Meadow Lane to provide a turn - around area for emergency and utility vehicles. This was required by both the Fire Chief and City Engineer. The applicant will also be responsible for constructing Leach Avenue, a 22 -foot roadway within a 24 foot right -of- way that will include a cul -de -sac at the end. The applicant is requesting a variance as City Code Section 121 -116 requires all new local streets to have a right -of -way of 50 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the variance given that existing roads in the area are platted at 24 feet. Recommended conditions in approving the variance include the construction of the turn- around at Fairfield and the eliminating of on- street parking on Leach Avenue. Storm Water Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by the Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011. Preliminary review by the MCWD indicates that stormwater rules will not be triggered as the entire subdivision is under one (1) acre in size. The applicant will be responsible for obtaining and complying with the required erosion control permit. MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC) The 2015 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. The MCES charge will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the three (3) lots and shall be the amount in effect at the time. City Water /Sewer Trunk Area Charges & Connection Fees The 2015 trunk water fee is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2015 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Payment of trunk water and trunk sewer charges for each of the three lots will be collected prior to release of the resolution. Applicant is advised that a request can be made to the Council to request these fees be paid at time of building permit issuance for the future new homes similar to the MCES SAC charges. However, the amount to be collected would be the the current fee(s) in effect at the time of permit issuance. The 2015 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per lot and the 2015 water connection fee is $240.00 for each of the three (3) new lots. These fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the amounts in effect at that time. M STAFF / CONSULTANT/ AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Dan Faulkner, Applicant has addressed concerns raised in the concept sketch plan City Engineer process. The applicant should be required to obtain a temporary easement /letter from adjacent property owners to allow for access to their property for the construction of the road and utilities. Melissa Manderschied, Road /utility improvements for subdivision are needed and are City Attorney anticipated to be privately installed by the developer. Applicant should address the directive previously provided from my colleague, Sarah Sonsalla, regarding the legal description to be used for the plat. Greg Pederson, There are no fire code or fire safety concerns with this project. Fire Chief Parking will not be allowed on both sides of the road. Scott Qualle, No comments. Building Official Amanda Bednar, MCWD As long as the project is under the combined total of one acre, the MCWD Stormwater Rule would not be triggered. An Erosion Control permit will be required for this project. Lynn Longfield, Once addresses have been assigned and service applications have Xcel Energy been submitted to Xcel Energy, I will be in touch with the contractor, electrician and /or property owner. DISCUSSION ® Subdivision of this property into three (3) lots is in keeping withthe property's designation as low density residential in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations. All three (3) lots are above the required minimum lot size and the applicant has demonstrated that conforming homes can be built on the property. -470- A variance is being requested to the minimum lot depth for Lot 3 as it is only 74 feet rather than the required 80 feet. At approximately 90 by 74 feet, the property is well above the code minimum requirements of 40 by 80. The issue with lot depth results from the orientation of the lot relative to the adjacent streets. Typically, this property would be a corner lot and its frontage along Fairfield Road would be considered the 'front." However, it was recommended by City Staff that Fairfield Road terminate at Leach Avenue, and a turn - around be provided, as it would best address emergency and utility access to these properties. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the requested major subdivision - preliminary plat, variance and major subdivision -final plat applications for the "Mission Woods" subdivision, subject to the following conditions: As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the City Engineer, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. 2. The street and utility plans shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee). The applicant shall be required to submit an engineer's estimate of the proposed improvements, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee). The submittal of a cash escrow or alternate form of financial security, as deemed acceptable by the City Attorney, in the amount of 125 percent of the engineer's estimate shall also be required. Details regarding the City's review and acceptance of the street and utility plans and financial security requirements shall be included and more fully defined in a Development Agreement which shall be required for the project. 3. The Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and the applicant shall meet all requirements and conditions identified in said Development Agreement. All costs associated with preparation of the Development Agreement shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 4. Applicant shall provide an easement or a letter from the adjacent property owners allowing access to their property during street and utility construction. 5. Leach Avenue and Fairfield Road shall be signed as "No Parking." -471- 6. Any curb, gutter, and streets which are disturbed as part of the construction process for the proposed streets and utilities shall be the responsibility of the permit holder to replace. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 8. Applicant shall pay all costs associated with the preliminary plat, final plat, and variance applications. 9. The applicant shall record the resolution(s), the final plat, the development agreement and all other required documents with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s), the final plat and all other required documents will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Release of the resolutions for recording shall be deemed conclusive proof that all conditions have been met. 10. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the preliminary plat application is approved. 11. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code shall be made prior to the release of the resolution(s), the final plat, the development agreement and all other required documents for recording at Hennepin County. 12. Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for each of the three (3) lots prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $6,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit, if an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. 13. Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for each of the three (3) lots shall be made prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $6,000.00 or the current amount in effect atthe time of the building permit, if an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. 14. Payment of a sewer connection fee of $240.00 and awater connection fee of $240.00 for each of the new three (3) lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. 15. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the three (3) new lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 16. The applicant satisfy all items included in the Plat Opinion prepared by the City Attorney. -472- in recommending approval of the major subdivision - preliminary plat, the major subdivision final plat and variance applications, Staff offers the following findings: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The property is suitable for the single- family homes that are being proposed. 3. The applicant will provide public streets and utilities to serve the properties. 4. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single - family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. 5. The three new proposed single - family residential lots will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 6. The street right -of -way variance meets the criteria in Sec. 121 -3 as the proposed project will be in harmony with the adjacent area and will constitute a stable and desirable city development. The proposed 24 -foot right -of -way is in keeping with the widths of adjacent neighborhood local streets. 7. The lot depth variance meets the criteria set forth in Sec. 129 -39 (a) as the variance meets the criteria for practical difficulties and is in general harmony with the intent of the zoning code. The applicant is intending to use the property for single - family residential purposes, which is the use intended in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ordinance. The need for the variance results from the shape of the property and the need for its frontage to be on Leach Avenue rather than Fairfield Road. The property is well over 6,000 square feet in size and would be conforming if the front of the lot was deemed to be Fairfield rather than Leach. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event recommendations are received from the Planning Commission, the applications will be forwarded to the City Council for review and consideration. Members are advised that Sec. 121 -61 (g) (i) of the City Codes requires that a public hearing be held by City Council for review of proposed major subdivision - preliminary plat. At this time, a possible City Council meeting date for the public hearing and for review of the major subdivision -final plat and variance applications is Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. -473- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Planning Commission Date Case No. City Council Date FEES MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION. 'CALL THE MOUND PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO CONFIRM CURRENT FEES. PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE. PROPERTY Subject Address _ En- f`r1 "te1d Kcc r INFO Name of Proposed Plat _. F r lec� r i'c k Se EXISTING Lot Block Subdivision LEGAL PID# Z a- 11-7 _ Z Ll ,. �_ 0029 ( &6) Zonin R1 R1A R2 R3 Bt 82 83 (Circle one) DESCRIPTION APPLICANT The applicant is: owner Y� other_ Email �(tt Fr iedt-cA sg @ ®® Name Pi ro h+ Fri e-f o Address 57 Qt i 3 f 4 t �i i Q. [d Ed Phone Home `)'5Z-5JT P -J'3J%d Work Fax Name Email OWNER (if other than Address applicant/ Phone Home Work —Fax Name _�ra C�R�inse2rrf.r 6lnail C4.ra� ®ice'ea6PQGt�fi Qpc �f0� SURVEYOR/ a �( �� ` o ENGINEER Address t ® ®O P lour s9v tier S-S'S3 7 Phone Home Work ��'� �' Fax 556 -q7Z -7723 Major Subdivision Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -474- � 1, N -/� Description of Proposed Use: , tt e grl, L c5 �5 EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. f P6 i�o /sue G If applicable, ad eve lop men t schedule shall be attached to this app Iicatio providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $_ ! 90, 000 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Number of Structures: 3 Number of Dwelling Units /Structure: Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: 1?eoo sq. ft. Total Lot Area: Ze/ L/ Z sq. ft. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? (X) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. S`} -rear Va_ea. ,dv - Ap-.p�oye<� /!% ©v. z ®t Application must be signed by alt owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this Is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided (including Section 121 of the Mound City Ordinance) and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the p,4rpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. � !, Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Major Subdivision Information (10/21/2013) Page 6 of 6 _4755_ R 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952472 -0620 f 1. A Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. City Council Date Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address Fca S: ,g �d PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Block DESC. Subdivision FcEec�rrc rtn' e ®8!a PID# Zonin R1 to R2 R3 61 82 63 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name Ke-rL+ PrL-dp c sen Email Ke(-Freec cl;tectC��a�ea.c OWNER Address $' 9 15 Fck i *r P ee_ [J gal Phone Home Work Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (X) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. .5$ree+ Vgaca-i- z'on cX-pr ccued Nov. 7613 Ul Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): r) 92ues+ 1 ® Dea E. Vc r!•a<wce cn C n 3 to �IEow %L1i� aie��lc. Variance Information (10/21)2013) Page 4 of _476_ Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: (N S E W) Side Yard: (N S E W) Side Yard: (N S E W ) Rear Yard: (N S E W ) Lakeside: (N S E W ) (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: REQUIRED ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft REQUESTED (or existing) ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft ft, ft ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow () topography () soil ( ) too small () drainage existing situation N too shallow () shape () other: specify Please describe Lo Variance Information (10/212013) Page 5 of 6 _477_ Case No.'�l 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No ( ). If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. C Variance Information (101212013) Page 6 of 6 -478- DateZ`�� ' Date November 3, 2014 City of Mound Mission Woods Subdivision Plat Variances Request. According to City Planning rules 2 variances will be needed Approval as part of the Subdivison Prelimanary and Final Plat overall Request of Mission Woods Subdivision. Proposed Variances Requested for Review and Approval per the Variance Application. 1) Request lot depth variance on Lot 3 for one foot frontage variance on at 79 feet as City Code requires 80 feet if cud -e -sac give up is included or 9.4 feet if excluding frontage of cud -de -sac to meet 80 foot requirement. a) Lot 3 still exceeds minimum required lot area by 32 %. b) Lot 3 All other lot sides meet the minimum code width or exceed.. c) Lot 3 If the North side of the lot is considered the front of the lot on undeveloped Fairfield road then the lot does meet or exceed all lot width requirements. D) Lot 3 size is consistent or larger than most existing lots in the immediate neighbor hood and Well exceeds the minimum lot size of 6000 total square feet. E) Do to the unique physical characteristics of the land included in the subdivision and needs to have a 24 foot length fire and safety turn around on Fairfield Undeveloped which was not requested to be Vacated which would have made the lot depth exceed the minimum code requirement for Lot Frontage.. I did not initially Request the additional Y, of 24 feet of Fairfield Rd Unimproved to help meet this requirement. Also adding the required cul -de -sac for fire and safety Requirements. F) If you measure the Lot 3 *minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 80 feet , except that lots fronting on a cul -de -sac shall be 80 feet at the front building setback line (LE 20 feet back from front property line. Applicable side or rear yard setbacks apply to lot lines a Abutting fire lanes, alleys, or unimproved street right -of -ways which this could be considered. Then lot would have 79 feet frontage at the front and the request would be for a one foot Variance request. . Also adding the required cul -de -sac for fire and safety Requirements. -479- 2)Request for approval of street width variance to allow 22 feet back to back (which would match Fairfield Improved current width back to back). Right of way 24 feet wide. A) Due to fact the the Unimproved roads were not upgraded to meet New City Planning Requirments the road right of way widths and unique shape and land this variance request approval would suffice due to the existing nature of road way widths and right of ways in the immediate area and unique land structure and lay -out that is being worked with. Consider this best option and consistent. B) Road width back to back would be consistent with existing roadways width and look of existing neighborhood. Respectfully, Kent Friedrichsen Owner and Requester. 5913 Fairfield Road Mound, Mn 55364 U- i i i a.3 zoN.,o y 1 1 I ; I l , i 1 1 wl ZGNMG N88 °81 "40'P! _ EwsnPG D]5iW61KKI5E T I l� / ry'\ P.REMIIXG Waal, h I I � 1 LOT h— I I I ' � I 1 _ i \ 1Y LOT 2 B.N3 R.0. `Y. _ aF y'nReP41 f , PflvmPACOq°G'A+\EG, . I i _ I` -. 1 1 w� PII PSS[NUxG I I -� i 1 NLa OvelwGxousE r NIC r I'� LOT ' II 1 {I 1 L_ I I •- I MINUTES DECEMBER i" Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone (7:02) and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Doug Gawtry and Bill Stone. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Barb & Dave Bode (2003 Arbor La); Jim Dustrude (2001 Arbor La) APPROVAL MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to approve the agenda as is. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 18,201 Correction on page 3; change lot width from 36 feet to 37.66 feet. MOTION by Goode, second by Bergquist, to approve the November 18, 2014 minutes with the change as requested. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -27 Variance 2001 Arbor Lane Applicant: Jim Dustrude Case was introduced by Sarah Smith. The applicant is requesting variance approval for a 2 -car detached garage with upper floor bonus space. The partial garage structure, which was started in 2011, was constructed on a concrete slab and is closed to the elements. The proposed 20' by 24' garage includes a small balcony on the south side and an upper floor cant on the east side remodel of the existing house. The applicant is also contemplating connecting the garage to the existing house. Several variances are requested including: 1) property has water on 3 sides making it difficult to impossible to meet the 50 foot OHWM setback on the southeast corner of the proposed garage; 2) minimum elevation for new construction on Lake Minnetonka is 933 feet; garage slab is proposed at 931.8; and 3) accessory building height is being proposed higher than the house. Wegscheid felt that the elevation is an issue. Floodproofing is fine; eave is fine because it's in the air and less intrusive than if it was a foundation measurement. He feltthey should talk about the roof line. El MO. Smith commented on the building height variance and roof. Whether or not the roof should be measured to the midpoint of the gable roof or the shed dormer roofline, the garage is higher than the existing house based on the code. Retterath discussed the way the building height was being measured. He questioned the need for the 10 foot ceiling height. Smieja questioned the application from 2013. Smith replied that it was for the entire project. Staff requested that Mr. Dustrude proceed with a new application to address the garage individually. Retterath indicated that the Commission dealt with building height in the past and granted a couple of variances recently. He indicated that the building can be fioodproofed. These standards are outside the Commission's control. Retterath was curious about the background of the placement of the foundation. Jim Dustrude (2001 Arbor Lane) stated that the old garage was moved in about 2003 and the new slab was started in 2003 without the required permits. Footings were installed according to code. The current structure was done to replace the current structure. Retterath asked about the timing of the phases. Dustrude said that he had delays in getting the structural engineer to evaluate the house. Retterath asked if the footings are found lacking, would they be torn out. Dustrude replied that underpinning has been suggested. Retterath asked why Staff recommended the garage be done first. Smith said Staff was waiting to get a complete application. Expediency was necessary to accelerate the garage project. She also stated that once the new garage project is done, the existing structure will be removed. The sooner we get there, the sooner we can get rid of old garage. This process was deemed to be most appropriate to complete this project. Retterath asked about the overhang on property line limits, windows and eave width. He had no problem with the Lakeshore distance and the walkway eave should be a non - issue. He can't support the building height as the ceiling heights could be reduced from 10 feet to 8 % feet. He also commented that the sheer walls on either side of the garage door need to be engineered and the stair going up to the 2 "d story does not meet the building code. The rest is ok. Smieja stated that building height has to do with asthetics. After viewing the property, he thought there was no visual perspective to notice 2 feet. He has no problem with the building height. Im Stone questioned the applicant as to how sure he was of the house project going forward and what was the timeframe. Dustrude replied that the house would be done shortly after the completion of the garage. Barb Bode (2003 Arbor Lane) said that the biggest problem is that we've been dealing with it since 2003. They've tried to sell their house and would like this to be moved along as quickly as possible as long as it stays over the lot line. Dave Bode (2003 Arbor Lane) thought there was a lot of red tape. It's a beautiful design. MOTION by Goode, second by Stone, to recommend approval of the variances with Staff recommendations 1 -10 and findings of fact 1 -10. MOTION carried. Penner, Bergquist, Gawtry, Goode, Smieja, Stone, and Wegscheid voting for; Retterath voting against. Retterath felt that the building height could be minimized and building the garage first and house second was a backwards way of doing it and may be setting a bad precedence OLD /NEW BUSINESS Staff /Council Liaison Update Smith • Council reappointed and appointed the recommended commission members • Vacation of Galway and the Fairfield subdivision • New commissioner training is open for anyone — hope to plan in early January Wegscheid • MCES meeting with CC on December 11th was a good cooperative meeting • Search for new Director of Public Works • Search for new Administrative /Finance position • New Parks Commissioner has a background in grant writing Joint workshop with the City Council has been suggested for February 17th but may be Monday, February 91h (preferred) or Wednesday, February 11th. MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to recommend February 9, 2014 for the joint City Council /Planning Commission workshop. MOTION carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Retterath, to adjourn at 8:32 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander m MINUTES FEBRUARY Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. SWEARING IN OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS City Manager Kandis Hanson was in attendance at the meeting and swore in Jason Baker, Pete Wiechert, Jeffrey Bergquist, and Cynthia Penner. City Manager Hanson provided a development update and fielded questions from the Commissioners. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Jason Baker, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, Pete Wiechert and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, City Manager Kandis Hanson, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La), Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd) APPROVAL MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to approve the agenda with an amendment to appoint an interim Chair. MOTION carried unanimously. APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CHAIR FOR MEETING MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to approve Cynthia Penner as interim Chair until Chair and Vice Chair are appointed later in the meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW AND ACTION ON DECEMBER 16 2014 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Gawtry, second by Smieja, to table the approval of the December 16, 2014 minutes until the March meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Cases No. 14 -15 & 14 -16 Public Hearing for Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat /Final Plat /Variances Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen Chair Penner opened the Public Hearing. -491- Item was introduced by Rita Trapp. Applicant Kent Friedrichsen is proposing a three lot major subdivision of the property located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane, Fairfield Road and Leach Avenue. Variance approval is being requested for 2 parts of the subdivision: 1) Construction of a 22 foot street from back of curb to back of curb in a 24 -foot right -of -way; and 2) Lot depth variance for Lot 3 to allow a 74 foot depth instead of an 80 foot depth. A concept /sketch plan for this property was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2014 meeting and by the City Council at its May 13, 2014 meeting. Trapp reviewed the history of the area regarding recent land use changes affecting the neighborhood. She explained the 2 requested variances as well as storm water and parkland dedication. Staff recommends approval of the major subdivision - preliminary plat, variances and major subdivision —final plat applications subject to conditions as listed in the planning report. Smieja asked if there was a drawing showing the depth of the lots. Trapp said it wasn't included in the packet but did locate one and demonstrated their conformity and how it was measured. Applicant Kent Friedrichsen, 5913 Fairfield Road, indicated that parking on Fairfield Road and Meadow Lane is currently restricted to one side only. Stone asked if he planned to build on the properties. Friedrichsen said he is working with a builder. After the infrastructure is in place he will finalize plans for the houses. Baker asked if, when we grant a lot depth variance, they can come back and request a setback variance. Trapp said that there is always that possibility. Smith reiterated that the zoning for these lots is R -2 and is consistent with the low density requirement in the comp plan. Minimum lot size is 6000 square feet. These lots are considerably larger than required. This does not prevent someone from requesting setback variances but it has been demonstrated that a house can be built on these lots. She went on to explain the major subdivision procedures. Smieja asked about the two - family minimum lot size. Smith indicated that the two - family minimum lot size in the a R -2 District is 14,000 square feet (non - lakeshore) and if they wanted a two - family unit the lots would have to be replatted. MOTION by Bergquist, second by Gawtry, to approve with Conditions 1 -16 and Findings 1 -7 from the Staff Report MOTION carried unanimously. -492- OLD /NEW BUSINESS A. Election of Chair and Vice Chair for 2015 MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to re- appoint Penner as Chair for 2015. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Penner, second by Wiechert, to re- appoint Goode as Vice -Chair for 2015. MOTION carried unanimously. B. Staff /Council Liaison Report /Update • New Planning Commission Member Training upcoming on Monday, February 9th. • Planning Commission and City Council joint special meeting workshop scheduled for Monday, February 9, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. • Staff will be attending meeting preparation for updating the MCWD Comp Plan • Gearing up for Spring construction C. Review of Planning Commission Work Rules for 2015 MOTION by Gawtry, second Smieja, to move review of the Work Rules to the March 3, 2015 meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Wiechert, to adjourn at 8:06 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -493- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 9, 2015 CALL TO ORDER Planning Commission Chair Penner called the special meeting workshop to order at 7:00 PM. Planning Commissioners Present: Cynthia Penner, Jennifer Peterson (Council Liaison to Planning Commission) David Goode, Doug Gawtry, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, Jeff Bergquist and Pete Wiechert. The special meeting workshop notice also included the Mound City Council so Council members could attend and discuss 2013 -2014 Planning Commission projects and work plan for 2015. The following City Council members were present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid and Council Member Jennifer Peterson (Council Liaison to the Planning Commission), Heidi Gesch and Kelli Gillispie. Staff present: City Manager Kandis Hanson and Community Development Director Sarah Smith Members of the Planning Commission, City Council members and Staff introduced themselves and provided a brief overview of their background. Smith provided a brief development update and summarized the 2013 -2014 Planning Commission projects list including code changes related to the keeping of chicken and bees, amendments to Chapter 129 and Chapter 14 related to the keeping of animals and review of the City's regulations related to pool regulations. The Planning Commission and City Council reviewed and discussed the list of possible projects for 2015, as identified below: Review of City Code Chapter 6- minimum required seating and other requirements for liquor licenses. Mound's code requires a minimum seating of 40 seats and also includes a specific requirement related to the percentage of food /alcoholic beverage receipts. It was mentioned that the City of Minneapolis recently amended its required percentages. Review of brewhouse and /or tap room regulations - Mound's code does not include specific regulations for brewhouse /tap rooms and this type of use is becoming increasingly popular and could be a unique feature and draw to the community. There are regulations in state statutes related to brewhouses and tap rooms. Home occupation signage - this item was evaluated a few years ago and the Council opted not to change the regulations which currently do not allow for signage. Discussion took place about reviewing the regulations to allow for some signage. , Expansion permits — filling in or going up of a non - conforming structure that is a conforming use. Planning Commission and Council members were supportive of evaluating the regulations for possible streamlining. Pawn shop regulations - Mound's code does not include regulations for pawn shops. Smith mentioned that this topic came up as part of the City's adoption of regulations for second hand stores and could be a cooperative project with the Orono Police Department. Review of hardcover regulations -possible amendments related to alternative methods (i.e. rain gardens, etc) - this topic was brought to the Planning Commission and City Council by former Planning Commissioner Kelvin Retterath. Discussion also took place about ways for the Planning Commission to assist the Council with projects including assistance with communication and marketing. Planning Commissioner Smieja mentioned that as part of his recent campaign, he spoke with several individuals who had questions about the plans for downtown and that many were not aware of the City's vision. Discussion took place about the Mound Magic presentations, the marketing study that was completed in Fall 2013 and some of the recent projects in Mound including the Landings, the opening of Cattails, the remodel and reuse project of the former Westonka Animal Clinic that is currently underway. Discussion about communication methods, including the newsletter and social media, also took place; also press releases and possible mini -blog. Members of the Planning Commission and City Council are supportive of using multiple methods for communicating to our residents and businesses. Mayor Wegscheid also requested that the Planning Commission take the lead on the City's review of Comprehensive Plan as one of its projects and suggested members to begin by reading and becoming familiar with the current plan. Discussion took place including Planning Commission review on a chapter by chapter basis. The 2015 projects for the Planning Commission are as follows: Review of City Code 6 (Alcoholic Beverage) regulations and study of brewhouse / tap room regulations Review of Expansion Permit regulations o Review of home occupation signage Study of pawn shops regulations e Comprehensive plan review ADJOURN MOTION by Goode, seconded by Bergquist, to adjourn at 9:00 p.m. All in favor. MOTION carried. Submitted by Sarah Smith -495- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING WORKSHOP FEBRUARY 18, 2015 CALL TO ORDER Planning Commission Chair Penner called the special meeting workshop to order at 7:00 p.m. at the Dakota Junction restaurant located at 2281 Commerce. Boulevard. The purpose of the special meeting workshop was to discuss a volunteer- driven, community revitalization initiative and consider using the website www.HoodStarter.com in that endeavor. Planning Commission Members Present: Cynthia Penner, Jennifer Peterson (Council Liaison to Planning Commission), David Goode, Jameson Smieja and Pete Wiechert. Chair Penner announced that a quorum of the Planning Commission was present. It was announced that a special meeting workshop of the City Council was also scheduled to be held on Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. at the Dakota Junction restaurant for the same purpose. The following City Council members were present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid and Council Member Jennifer Peterson. Mayor Wegscheid announced that a quorum of the City Council was not present. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith Others present: Justin Ley (HoodStarter.com) and Kevin Edinger (President of the Mound Westonka Rotary). Members and attendees received a presentation from Justin Ley and asked questions about HoodStarter.com which started operations last fall and can be used as tool to help find uses for vacant buildings and allows for input from interested parties and neighborhoods. Mr. Ley has worked on projects in Calhoun Square and Columbia Heights and recently began a project in Albertville. Discussion took place about having Mr. Ley do a presentation at an upcoming meeting of Westona Community and Commerce and that establishing and maintaining communication with building owners is very important so the City can be a resource and have current information for prospective businesses that are looking to locate in Mound. ADJOURN MOTION by Penner, seconded by Wiechert, to adjourn at 7:45 p.m. All in favor. MOTION carried. Submitted by Sarah Smith r, Ott Em Date Weather Cust 15 Cust 14 Variance 2015 2014 Difference +/- 2/1/2015 672 -672 17430.07 0 2/2/2015 pt sun 10 209 209 3992.88 3992.88 2/3/2015 snow 12 265 209 56 4864.33 3740.06 1124.27 2/4/2015 sun 10 221 254 -33 4489.08 4802.97 - 313.89 2/5/2015 pt sun 20 278 245 33 5135.4 4489.99 645.41 2/6/2015 pt sun 37 487 246 241 11241.8 4945.97 6295.83 2/7/2015 pt sun 30 524 495 29 12271.84 13569.02 - 1297.18 2/8/2015 524 -524 12310.28 - 12310.28 2/9/2015 pt sun 25 242 242 4483.13 4483.13 2/10/2015 sleet 30 234 217 17 4805.79 3676.25 1129.54 2/11/2015 ovrest05 278 280 -2 5614.2 5369.73 244.47 2/12/2015 ovrest05 279 274 5 6343.33 5385.48 957.85 2/13/2015 pt sun 25 480 298 182 11808.66 5741.18 6067.48 2/14/2015 pt sun 20 538 534 4 13592.97 13731.14 - 138.17 2/15/2015 468 -468 11083.12 - 11083.12 2/16/2015 snow 15 243 243 4120.57 4120.57 2/17/2015 cldy 10 219 249 -30 4288.97 4592.86 - 303.89 2/18/2015 sun 10 219 295 -76 4180.5 5776.16 - 1595.66 2/19/2015 pt sun 20 261 288 -27 5990.89 5495.66 495.23 2/20/2015 pt sun 20 473 376 97 11215.46 7837.8 3377.66 2/21/2015 sun 28 483 531 -48 11558.87 12603.33 - 1044.46 2/22/2015 543 -543 13689.04 - 13689.04 2/23/2015 sun- 11to23 224 224 4705.39 4705.39 2/24/2015 sun 30 245 253 -8 4772.4 4479.68 292.72 2/25/2015 sun 0 220 246 -26 4622.69 5167.33 - 544.64 2/26/2015 sun 15 265 273 -8 5546.97 5080.36 466.61 2/27/2015 sun 05 461 246 215 10790.12 5850.65 4939.47 2/28/2015 sun 10 517 571 -54 12808.8 13423.01 - 614.21 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 7865 8587 -722 173245 192285.1 - 19040.1 -497- March 3, 2015 Kevin Borg Superintendent Westonka Public Schools 5901 Sunnyfield Road East Minnetrista, MN 55364 Dear Kevin, The Mound City Council continued to evaluate the request for a sidewalk on Grandview Boulevard at the February 24th regular council meeting. Bolton and Menk presented three options along with the estimated costs of each. In the end, the council recommended the school district consider making a request for a crosswalk to be added at the Grandview /Bellaire Lane intersection and a sidewalk be added on the north side to connect the new crosswalk to the new Grandview Middle School sidewalk. We have attached a cost estimate of the sidewalk addition and a simple sketch of the plan. Please note that Grandview is a state aid street and ramps are required for sidewalks. if the plan moves forward, we recommend removing a portion of the school's sidewalk to deter mid -block crossings. The city would also like to a cooperative maintenance agreement be developed, particularly to address responsibilities for long -term maintenance and during snow events. We ask that the school district notify the city if you wish to move forward with the proposed plan. The city will include it as a bid alternate so that the school district can see the additional amount they would be assessed. The city would only accept the bid alternate for the sidewalk if the school district gave its final approval to move forward after reviewing the bid results. The bid due date is April 7th and the council will approve the bid at the April 14th meeting. Please let me know if you need any other information at this time. Sincerely, ft •� Kandis Hanson City Manager cc: Dan Faulkner, City Engineer Mayor and Council primed on recycled paper 2015 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENTS SIDEWALK ADD COST ESTIMATE - BELLAIRE LANE TO SCHOOL SIDEWALK NnRTH SIDE SIDEWALK ITEM UNIT - QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK SQ FT 619 $6.00 $3,714.00 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY /SIDEWALK SQ FT 114 $7.20 $820.80 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 15 $30.00 $458.52 TRUNCATED DOMES SQ FT 16 $60.00 $960.00 CROSSWALK MARKINGS SQ FT 72 $5.00 $360.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $6,313.32 20% ENGINEERING &ADMIN: $1,262.66 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $7,575.98 GRANDVIFM/ RnULEVARD C1250�� ,37 3/4/2015 ,TO All vEasoNS 0r TnEfiEvaESExrs TnatxemE E,YMrn..nzm91e rw oxn e, er Pe/alov[ne Be +[nnap,anm aawM1e in NaC- I.M.anePn Bvu NMinnnuu ioM d E .c 1 S an .1 yn el Ld 11. BOA 0. Mnq v<auM ar qa ea AII, Yne ✓ wie Lc15 WenAe wN0 aaaa uW Lcl r r IF m AIINNEBOTA BP,,Fl 6UMMEa pESEAITY. wrbnq to e,aw eeE qal MrM enf(a eneq reroren N<eXrce olAe Gevnh Pecerexr Mennapn wunA Mmnezeh. �ncbdnp loot paM1 Orw.ake Lee[e <nnue ly�np e[9a[ iN M, tel E. .1 AAR TFT Pat4neNeeeer96.Po1'..'A homTlS'DIMME aAGES" aag OlMyn[Wm9 Xmm�erelvYw�e, LeacSyP nue y.I, Cedbl Ne aNeveANam➢N IN. Mma Wml en rpe aaa Pan o BM Pp d BbA]. MINNESOTA BAPTIST ADMNIR ASSEMBLY, Ne "n Cuunry, MnaewO 0.H,nmieM wraYne Goan MARM wN Nx wuN Ne Nan0 Ble i'.]rtcmapld en Ne MR, - NMwl9fi001eelnerMMm Ne..M wratt el ww ObcY]. T,I McI NeE NI.E o. B1-AMtaa 10-1 noMMhbomU �N.—I i nm.M eBleok �� 4lyinpaoNe6xM el Na_AF1 MMe I,Te noMY4m R_N1 SIx, .wz MAI.1 meFa.areAwn A,,M.naewbr.I AM IMMMIN I- ...d NWMN 1.-11 me COUmy elW—R, sM. el MiNwenbK TnM R Y.wua XukPAV. nw aMFMRUd ac.e. AEmareemme pSl N'M M_. Baaxl.O 1A+nmL ✓,wlaFMmea Rev, An' aeeow IMMI4wnue'PS a MN e /Pe veaNM awknawn wl Ne non00n 00.T vq MR. walxM el qe noMNh xwenwn al Ne wa1 Ma of nM BbcY ],.ne wuNaM el Me pM.dmolwi, Fnnnl, Rwae an, ea AM wenMPnensnn. .. ................� .Y.u...ramwMwmM wn e, 6bM>.MINI£SOTA BiPTI6i SUMMER ASSEMOLV .cw,GnPbNe nmrAe ^^N +wn hoe Neno( Na _.¢ A. I..' N u M� Nn MR. ... mq W vdM WS A. o. "A' GNN.N 1e N. WHiS for putln uae Gwent l4a cu46Sao an, Nea AMMY ear'ak an,trdcab b N ... wwMreol w e xem E. Fee. xeel E. FnA,rcMen STATE OF MINNESOTA OV O ipe b'A'S.A..— l ue+ecYnevMtl2e,nbre roNn —_nY A.—,, A. Oamlo.. Mnby cerMY INM M. _'z ..Pod.. Ce ,M'-M. 0.uaaJIP. Oamip L+n, Eu—` M.-M a L..,. Nw. INMM A W MmreSe Om IT`N mal m+ awl e^ a Enn. ,n[kv eUAlee on de wlanevN STATE OF MINNA" fAVNTY OF ,.ANG_p[meia [eM6nu— a+Yeaektlee, AIRA ma Nb_ wOt I. —M, R.NM`. -M. A'mMFM Llnrux NO. 19064 Nman vu N.. �— Cavnn. Mnwwl. My Commcspn Exprea MONA. MINNESOTA lMZ p'a[ tl MItSON 9V000.S w+[ a{prove, M,+cngee Ey Ne Gy fauncl al Meuna, Mmnewd M e n9uMr meMinO Nanwl Intl N2�. aM o/ 20_� II+ppOC +de. Ne mmen umnan4 m,nzemmeN +l.n+ e(Ne Cemm.viwar N in.zWNpon+ne Ire AM' C Hglix'ry Enpener pwe ann renivM W IM1e CM or Ne pnwnM ]OAYRao,M1e++MRetlx ✓ nouLnnlprW auN wmneM++n, r+w Alne+, va pa dN Iq IA, 6blNe+. Se+Wn SOv.09. 6u162 . CITY GOUNPL OF TE qT OF MOUND, MINNESOTA By BY GaYger4 TAxpAYEF REAMER OEPARTMEM. Henaew Gwary, Minnewb 2O 1IN., mTM.. Me lnea pyade n 20 vn, A-, M-1. ken Own pi, iq Yn,AwrSetlan N. wt D+b, Nb��AYM B ON Mary V. Gkepn. Geunry PWOOr SURVEY gNNON. n.nnepip Coun,Y. Mmneao® PunvenlMMnn.6bL Sec X%.56511869)Me pbl MS beenepp,evaLMU —�,vy w( "Nlm .O AAG.NNPI By REGISTRAR OF TIRES, .—Al GAud, Mmeeaob IkMeby urah Nel Ne wNm W[eIMI3AON WOOFS 1w54k,nNaeR N. —SAY Cr 30 v1�tl01o[k��M. RAM. I.. A[VnO ReBiaV e, Ol'.A COUNT'RECORDER neenepe `1 'MA .xH��v1 cela[k —M Ike,ppyceNty lkMNe Mkm pin el NI5HON 440009 uas Neemm"dOn N.___n +Y el BY WN MNaeI rL CUnniX. Ceunly Re10n.r ;MISSION WOODS 1J SO IN N N88r51'40"W �MOARE SnO V RJ THIr95EMEM8 I II 5� a BEING 6 FEETINVeOTHPND AD,gMNO SIDE pNDUO FEET IN VADT n ANO PDYE OMOITED. LINES NLE55 OMENMGA'INDIfA]EDR LOT .1.1 1 -- — — _r —_ `BgpTIST9DIMER A38EMBlY 5, SUMMER 'NE 60UfM LINEµy 611MFD 0EPRIND OF MCI" C,M As6EMOLV NNS NOMONVM NT6.ADLSNOWNONT- FLATIMANCAF II3INCH BY t <INGIRONMONUMENi TOBE9ETNSTHIN ; YEAR OF RECORpNO TH19P1AT. MAR1[EOBV LICENSE NUMBER DAG C DENOTES IF1'9Y lY "MONMONVMENT ENLEMASS 61 ROTIER 19E6MVM BER;We6. ® Umµ Q.i ERVASE WHO'Md FOUND. m 0 0 SCALE I " =20' PAGAN 6 ;= IR9fzVB Np�gA RINO COMPANY, m SH 40,356E 40,35 313 aYp —LEACH AVENUE A98 I 3 n I a+ II I { i I I e-aMxa 3 S68.51'40E 24.03 I S69'03'I6 "E I _- —_ L - --- 696`51'ep'E • O � zz II l i Z..• � I I __ I I ` �_= � 1_ - == L _�I - - -I - - L - - -- BLOCK -J L--- - - - - -� N88r51'40"W �MOARE SnO V RJ THIr95EMEM8 I II 5� a BEING 6 FEETINVeOTHPND AD,gMNO SIDE pNDUO FEET IN VADT n ANO PDYE OMOITED. LINES NLE55 OMENMGA'INDIfA]EDR LOT .1.1 1 -- — — _r —_ `BgpTIST9DIMER A38EMBlY 5, SUMMER 'NE 60UfM LINEµy 611MFD 0EPRIND OF MCI" C,M As6EMOLV NNS NOMONVM NT6.ADLSNOWNONT- FLATIMANCAF II3INCH BY t <INGIRONMONUMENi TOBE9ETNSTHIN ; YEAR OF RECORpNO TH19P1AT. MAR1[EOBV LICENSE NUMBER DAG C DENOTES IF1'9Y lY "MONMONVMENT ENLEMASS 61 ROTIER 19E6MVM BER;We6. ® Umµ Q.i ERVASE WHO'Md FOUND. m 0 0 SCALE I " =20' PAGAN 6 ;= IR9fzVB Np�gA RINO COMPANY, m W51N:GNWSE ' 1 i-- i / V`� R3zENMG i \, k, 1 �RMBUP (� � e pu BpEwaT�nw FJS M J I rl 40.35 Ira FAIR IS RFIELO J Rpgp : _ � L � s n• FAIRFIEtp RQ( I NvAMmkl [A4 �SSNiIP wWr/.nM) OpRaE,�� LE1FH10= ..n MVAlab L0T3 \ i {g wz zoruNE / 2409 xse —w ' ON p1 ee V. J� Q h\ p- xZ�INE )J J m 0 J(4 WONpME ` ft LOTZ L - -- �- - - - -- �- -- 4444 -- J I ,TL— - atZONING N88'51'40'W W59NG \' Fay - I -� euuowc I I l I - I _ 1 � pEVI510Nb PpFPrREOF[N. M' KENT FRIEDRIGHSEN B . fl0t3E CONSULTNGEN GUANO SUS, 1.0 1®xw p B 5919 FMR 1E10 ftOM ENGIIVEEflING PANNERSetl AN09 R£ R6 "TM•'� nNn +N MOUND, N1N ES3e9 C ®IVIPflNY, INC. U14c. 1=W T,MN STREET. BURN.,,,, MINNESOTA5 37 PN(PU)333 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: .,Nm.Yn.waN.Na.N r s.m.+N.wn a.aa_a.a eewen.Iwro,vnM1. w+..+m.]eo.iea Wamueuewu MNMennoY�a f. Joan �lv. �,�, .ym ♦. yn,.ay MN m' H6a..nr p�vauneYm pq T+f uvn~',9 Wgen mw N��rorn fs�n Www n. +�autl µqn .w mw MgaY] iu� ✓Im�o�xu�I.+ar. savwaM WIY BnW A.mn�vundY Mi muaMga4v /�^ fly= pbnalNM gWCBbd'HmM /qeu Tas o_ a.w.. xYao r... ew.adm Y w mm q 9w m a m> uwrw,. Wlm, 3w,9R wwnlw.uavW/ ]wa quaev�, wmv wwa �FEUM�+M/KVa /4,wFnaw_R"' W�µ�� wart»T.aaminaMK* ZONING: R-2 Zen g D Iid � YmlalA,®M1m LY.abe)= ®y5'qum Fwl M �um La WtlN Invp YBEII«°I `w Flel mmrM9amM mFSI EM. vwsas«a= ps YSNEemvJl`t6ievt udmim1d04'111.MHe1 MOBMnFaet MNn9'nRW Ma Pe9YiNnBN ` vENI %.B �Mnlm.ma MmMpv ..mw me(u.xNwewmaT ^^^IMw^^B'OneLROMimu.NS«n . rYw_ m�ml ®IIV,IwIMrro Nin WXtlW OSYro4 Mq +. «NlmYCwtl.�'�Q�Y =. InPIYdr �mweW Mbt WB IIXmaW MYI«ry NiM M.ro. PROPOSED PLAT INFORMATION LOT TmRy MTppFA =xS,N3 W.A =Offiwa pgpPO6m LVLOE SRCM1REFs 1595 V p N-1 W3�BI55 W.M1^ In i.lMi N.M1 tot3.]&SY9.h LOTOEVIX IA11 � 9]Nal aolz -wml 1013 = ]. kel (W m>� m>ureBl WETLANDS &FLOODPLAINSm B.Te en m.eB.rr>s «MmJ99Fe U nLITtES Fm vlvwarn EM12 GRADING Pm WMY Mm9p «�s1N.13 PUBLIC AREAS e0 bfp90tl" TMrt Am.NVioMtlWYNE ]T NY uvt OUwlllmn W M h Wc. ReRtTnO VMe MeN ppYmmmM1«PNk. P B m m SCALE 1 " =20' PROJECT CONTACT INFORMATION .mwFlmiR Nm e .an F'.raNe. M«etl, MN 55]M Po: 9SlJLJ3W , wmB I ENM ^B 1O]I E.NBNSt EYmnN.. Mx son E,N.➢ 0.9 aa«q oe. 9EN93zJOw PROPOSED VARIANDS Tn bIk9W .w,w 9m o.....ew.+um w vwm+m t. PenYealmlamm w+w mwl ammar.>t ewl eaawltW mtle ^�nm F.Min!a �.en�i bakmwaA m1��hwB Waa+f) x w vY.nuw,:mwn.rnwmwarluame » t,rewmla STREET PARKING wm YmeMammtlBBeM.mNe�9lm ywl,m netm wmrokmoxe °O "f°fMp°°"1 «F.wed mma owm mNmme PBeceeom9MINBBmB a PITT x YNITS PLW 3 EFADMC ➢LV1 . DPfFLB S HW810N. Sf9I1@IT EBM'110L 4 Po11L E•u9lwunox PWI E q ID O DCL3G9L PRELIMINARY PLAT SSION WOODS I 6 / E I � I �N✓9>XM BI �aER�FMNBG I XGSE p8U �0%WTEO ,^ L PeFUaeW6mue , , r3W - hFAAI FIE�p f–_a ROgp 'ExXw mu PI.___ I , 16 I� L �4T� ' +�yl'41NttRu I mmn {Aa•n ' 14 �� Y oRlcTkrtx��' e GF f9°�IXnrFn 3 I l SEWO p }I GXO Y DROP WRAGE I �1M�_Igl! I I 1 / 0 NY9n9A:l Ni I— Z — — — — — W n \G4EE34 `w \ I I I I 2 FS F6 1'DRGP GAR4GE T DROP OEE I I I I I L - -- -- ----J L- --- - -- --I EtIIm xG - G CONSULTNO ENGINEERS, wL•um++m +�^`>I °a' PLANNERS 6Rd LAND GURYE'YORE FNF Uwsm.RP m.,em XSl�awT^ COMPRN4, INC. i 1000 EAST 146th EIREET, BURNSNLLE. MINNESOTA %337 PH (852)432 -3000 i + W �Q O NURFIEID RDAD M IM) I T I I I I E53IMG MOJR I I 1 I I ( I — 71-- x6 o xo a SCALE 1"=2� CONSTRUE WISE MtEO. t.6WITMY bEWERPPE SNALL0E 9O0.t0 JNLE35OtI WSENOTEG 1, WA�pMr�IN %PESNALL BELV53 F3OUCTILE WCN UMLES6OfMER 9. 4'M9ER,tCE PIPESXMLeE8g1-ffi Bp{EeeWlLef iN4TALL£D AT fJSEMENI LME {. P LOPPER6ERNCE WIfN GIR091Y)P (1YPEI(LY.Y�PERi LORE M.1NM'I'E_ MENT b. WTE STPTION361WVM MErOOVNN6TPF1 -M fi. 6µRNiY3ERNLF EtEVATIOM96NOWX ON LO10 AT TXE ARETO ME INERT CF 1NE SERVICE0.0W E.VE i /.LLMµXIX£S SNAIIfNVE 18109RRIEPS ING 1610 MCYE6, 9 rNELOMRALiORbNALL EN4NRE MWWOM VERTIGLSEPAMTIOV AT ALL CR046 9 WAIERMAIXPNESHLLHAVEAMI NIMWLOVEROF?SFEET GEruLS ANO sPELIFIGnou3. 10 I11 GNPBSGUTIE0.61ULl BEOE61ON 451RV �fiNTMN�g4jYOF MCUNO6TANDARO SNKL BEGWREtEG INAGWRGX Tf WAY ONLY.TIE LONTRF'CiO- ORALETFAMMETXEEYALr 11..4E WORK ,TNEGONFP.N A4'PEE6TO BEFJLLY MESNONN Ix /JI PPPRWIIMA ENLWG W9IU( CTOR tR E%ISTING VEILRIES 6NOWN OFILIIIESBEFOREGW'M roIEOp LON51M1OLTILx. ICLATIW OFANYAND µp/LLOApAGE30LCURWN+OURING pS3PON5101£FOR AxV 10 LLN {pACTO11b1NLLOEE FREMLN 80 %ES WRIHG WATEPIMAIX IXSTP11PrKR'. KENT FRIEDRICHSEN 5913FAIRFIELORMo MOUNO. MN 558N SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN & STREET CONSTRUCTION PLAN IUSSION WOODS ©m'® Mm 4 o. LEGEND 'Tf5 T_5f fRI5TwG S 5Atl TAR MANtlOIB 11 pENO 5ERVl� 0[NOT1!5 DI15TING N -RAN7 ''O"�.':.�@-� O[tiOTf5 FYI5TINGTRPf D9NO ?5 PROPOS °ED RP RAP 51P`LL'NAY • JI� __ pPNOTES CON5T -cTION LIMBS CONTOUR w - - D[ NOTES EXIST", MINO^ 9'X1— �— ",TES f %ISTING MINOR CONTOUR \ I •'� DENOTES PROP05ED MA- ""CONTOLIR i• .,.,� i r ' "" _ SCALE fir, . 7 !.. °'•! ( � / Etl9nxG NOUS[ _ ^ZO• seD pfNOTSS PROPOSED MINORCON"'pUR w 2 F41 TDROP DAMAGE I I, DROP GARAGE I \ \I / BUILDING 1 I E ENGIERPLANNERS and IAND SURVEYORS ENGINEERING ��- CoM?RNY, INC. ( 1000 EAST 146th REET• BURNSNLLE• MINNESOTA 55337 PH (954)431 -300 4 0 i CONSTRUCTION�a0 44015. Perlmdarmauda muMb dated ConaWNmis antlam��s TheProPmed rry n0 adltl^'9Ymwl0e mnsmrJed Prbrro belle eery oaM mPNaOa on GIRdil is a %PBCbdM De mmPlatetl q•JuH 4015. mmda6re do aNaM mn KENT FRIEDRICHSEN W,FAIRf1ELn90 0 MOUND, MN&EMN GRADING PLAN , I SION WOODS °� MINNESOTA i I � -� �_ = 'rnvataa..., ••jam? °`a*s.[m"°PGncv6Tewv9x9xE*an, f _ -,- ; ..5 . ... _ „1 I Lpry y -•Y � 3 "yr. C WpxIXbaO'Wlkbli 1 6 ��I13a (�I FinaTwDnlwaE 1 -- ^ 4'DROPPGGArs�GFL �u — \ fill ell \e ' i ' \ / / 1 6PSnxD Iwl6E I II 2 F41 TDROP DAMAGE I I, DROP GARAGE I \ \I / BUILDING 1 I E ENGIERPLANNERS and IAND SURVEYORS ENGINEERING ��- CoM?RNY, INC. ( 1000 EAST 146th REET• BURNSNLLE• MINNESOTA 55337 PH (954)431 -300 4 0 i CONSTRUCTION�a0 44015. Perlmdarmauda muMb dated ConaWNmis antlam��s TheProPmed rry n0 adltl^'9Ymwl0e mnsmrJed Prbrro belle eery oaM mPNaOa on GIRdil is a %PBCbdM De mmPlatetl q•JuH 4015. mmda6re do aNaM mn KENT FRIEDRICHSEN W,FAIRf1ELn90 0 MOUND, MN&EMN GRADING PLAN , I SION WOODS °� MINNESOTA i I � xMF rrrwxou!axuwMn Yex[tuwXU6�wS,ALLOn' -AREA ��xim�i mvvw�nuw>"wi�w� iva�.rsou' na wE' m°" w�wn °I:n°`EFiE°wox°••xuxX1°muunw. t��aa ;.q WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION wam/ <woE^ 1 3 ^IN � I �j/ �I .':,je{•{Mw i4 L mn .w[.!vw'O�mmu onw�x�w °van um[ pSUUNN,o K TXD uvtM ar M[ VJmv mxl!a xlx.'IxI WATT n[.x INOFFS pFa�XW7E WATERMAIN OFFSET Sim u! VFR1�LBUW 1 BFARINGAPFAISOM VARIES��a ,r V55n9301 I � I[xxx�M S.Ftu61 T, mauaWlnF��WaPM m Axawwc ti:i: .t: r.F VSE �nvaa. - -:n.• LNN 4 4w.nwuN a !ax� FIw,,""aAa4aa.xaxXFS,aN. �:�au�w�ixo[w'�v [i a+:r�.rowmx:wi� »:wsx HYDRANT INSTALLATION YE �, mnawu _ 1� - nx Purls �anmmo ,.x 1 .wvaw IFN�H � SM1'm�OXN r 1 ht Y,t [UKYEiHRV5T0LCIXIX[ j \`j�. .�,.w ,maxGwR,Fn.[ -µ.ax «[Ew P a`W °n s°°""ar"c o oxw.x �� o !a6 ♦IUMPIr 'oo out _fNo MUmLN:Otf[ Op. w. eMr aaR v vv DIP WATERMAIN TRENCH A'.nuoF mPaS[aE VARIES ra Rmx � r mnaN r; �XN Pu,RxMN4mmXN[vmrem...anrs Nn, ,.. ,A[,!wvv FEararM[rwXm )E'MINWVER COVE0. ynlp S[taatN n'�i,xRP , I I�NaPNRW �\ rss�'ww" "" - wrnesu+rr xMF rrrwxou!axuwMn Yex[tuwXU6�wS,ALLOn' -AREA ��xim�i mvvw�nuw>"wi�w� iva�.rsou' na wE' m°" w�wn °I:n°`EFiE°wox°••xuxX1°muunw. t��aa ;.q WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION wam/ <woE^ 1 3 ^IN � I �j/ �I .':,je{•{Mw i4 L mn .w[.!vw'O�mmu onw�x�w °van um[ pSUUNN,o K TXD uvtM ar M[ VJmv mxl!a xlx.'IxI WATT n[.x INOFFS pFa�XW7E WATERMAIN OFFSET Sim u! VFR1�LBUW 1 BFARINGAPFAISOM VARIES��a ,r V55n9301 I � I[xxx�M S.Ftu61 T, mauaWlnF��WaPM m Axawwc ti:i: .t: r.F VSE �nvaa. - -:n.• LNN 4 4w.nwuN a !ax� FIw,,""aAa4aa.xaxXFS,aN. �:�au�w�ixo[w'�v [i a+:r�.rowmx:wi� »:wsx HYDRANT INSTALLATION YE �, mnawu _ 1� - nx Purls �anmmo ,.x 1 .wvaw IFN�H � SM1'm�OXN r 1 ht Y,t [UKYEiHRV5T0LCIXIX[ j j �µe�ioX al a - 1 — a`W s°°""ar"c o oxw.x �� o vuvE n out _fNo MXOwS1- 1WMdRT!NRMe[C,9x S SIDEFHRVSTPEP y(MLfi/SGIN PPEESU0.EPLP � OEGPFEOF e eMr aaR p __- Pu,RxMN4mmXN[vmrem...anrs Nn, ,.. ,A[,!wvv FEararM[rwXm A�Nxm WmPamlx'mI[wuINKK EMU.mN V4pXXSlxFxvas wrSXnuAwnsnFUxl.4x ,aE W [rowo, i SEUwc smw'X a�a ma� C,MSULTNG ENGINEERS. X•TMO.!�Aa uX a.Ylmu. r `^°°L PLANNERS and UND SURVEYORS z COMPRNY, INC. L 1000 EAST 146!5 STREET. BtBRNSNtLE, MINNESOTA 55J3'1 PH (95R)J32 -J000 ]Y r ' I x �i i� x�waru¢rlrcXrwi E.aRWNp C �PFIVaM[vwmc wLnioinm`wEm!ro`v .RMrpn9L,oa /' 4rAe[a Y'YRNIPi[ a�WTmN[ntl RL,�,PXwMS,wX.LroXf°x,u[ ©..,FNOxmxxxve IwMxvwnol O p, w•wlnvmvXws y:[M![o1�xmlXxfx yOx W'[[MVN nYp°EOµwNNO Wnw4ux vrUSIUU615' ra n�i�muuo KENT FRIEDRICHSEN 5913 FMPREID ROAD MOUND, MN 55]6. 31' UL xamvx vwn MMn.m�alm vroen.wq w�� rynXU,JE1 us�Xo aMw.!�NPaxa. ,pulv,eM n,xaX!o:mna. x,MXL�.xx!n.,xa �mMIwXNEXRNNx °X>[ [ --, —ga NPx. Xx m„ m� ��o •C.\ w xwrtxrlmFCfvx ox p,EHortPeuxE* �. Ny PIANEW SANITAft�_ LE SEWER,MN 1.11 mE' Y�YE5,0ENa5A11GIPF SAES ASREav!REOPY uxs4xo sP TPU¢RwIRE xexouuaRRFn Is MAxPERe[xol - A}IKYIFpALEpViIR[ ,NM �ME�Cn`OX�N ygtUIRORaR paPEOfIWU -. wuu:[lmn v.w� [av[.NO!!EVVm.+r�.vry o o[.x �a Y� I CONCRETE DESIGN 5512 8_ 101MIN 11 MapYER BURYIYP I, (INODEMALI WAifl.TIGMUP OxooEN1W i SEWERSFRW[ESUIfE r-E.EMFNRMiN1.DN GPTMUM]➢LMNIE2SN Ep A5XEE0F0. uxolsluRPFO PROFIIE EN N WNL Xo SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ANdUH{E[5 -t aYxERwGE NEW CONSTRUCTIO WITHTRACC BOX xo. ra BfAlE DETAIL SHEET MISSION MOODS 0 11 I � I NOTE: See Mirv,eM1ehe Creek Wete25etl DIStrIG (MCW07 roles on SM1eet6. EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL 7 f•y�' I / a .Ib GIbUSE • :40R "."mYgWBR �.i l • •••��'RM __ /�I.y WEEV22Cpyr,EN Ynx a ROAD '1 1 1� I I 1000 EAST 146th STREET, SURMSWLLE MINNESOTA $5337 PH (952)442 -SDUU X10TE5 EA51ING 5ERV10`_ v D_fNOTE_5 ff5TING tyrTJ MNOOT SEED MIMRE 35 -141 DfNOTF5IX5TiNG TREE r AND DISK ANCHORING (0.6<T ACRES) RES ,.?L"" OENOTE5 PROP05ED RIP RAF ST.JY %E OfNOTE5510 INS PA, ..�JENOTES IXISTIN.G Mh'GR GCNTOJR 9loTn m5TING MINOR GONTO)z 20 0 20 40 DENOTES FRDF05ED MA:OR GGN'TOUR SCALE �r =2Or NOTE: ALL SILT FENCESHOWR BEHIND LURE DENOT5 PROFO5UD MINOR CONTOUR FINAL STABILIZATION ARE POSTSTREET CONSTRUCTION ' WStt1+NWEE 0 i � t ••••••'r .v./w / _ � / �(.� °°�'e�FERn°xr+RERrcmp"sE"v� o ....N....e.•. -_1 r ; ' O r _ - FA RFIELp a ° SAO w � FAiRFIELO RCMD FAIRFlO ROAD Et = r t 1 �- �" , _ I aRrEiM _ _5• - I _ ��' r f � � J � F1dTNEMtlISE ,�1�� ". ` 1 _ .._ .. e_ r .I E•II s � Jill X r. �� ff r 'r g EperMGNW6£ i II 1 / 1 { ',ice r1,riYJ u� I r S4 L r VOCE VI.T.ENC!JAFS '- / FYJS,ING euILgNG _.. pGAIT !`(1AITR(11 � Ina MCWD g,,,SIO�Med sMMnp ali Dmitosod mmftwnfrol, emsbn Plenc end arsine dK mod mnNen «avention, sediment mnlml end cent dPonm ^em lsunui=aEOn messums,in am,,A,o with the fdmwim cideda: (1) Plansand.beeheavena sham mnf«m to N, ,Phni ow,sbamKSNf cOmgiana Nash,sns Tel Mr Sosatl COnshnotl -n Oven -n' eMfEr Ne'2m MN SMrmwakr Mai l(Mlnneeete P.11den Comfy AOl 2004) (2) All stoat, Rod senses chap be in pAm been, any lienddsMrbin9 rea.t'a9¢k1M..1amed. hoed., tladMnyeakm Mee «otn«wiee ve pplee¢ed kOmem61 -, in ecWdana wiM to amaente lose Me madden MII be MAik e ,,mama, arid pooPew ua. dfimwcf« (a) bill(enm sHail mnMm m6ealoK 3h6G.tawn �i2a,9 od'1.a�maYw a emeMW (5) NI Rom.c...=......_ ._ _ _.. m,bd¢¢h¢II Kt b¢ remdled Mol lM Oitist has Wttla sits MS ¢dn petmenently fgeeb5atl and ahnl ba nntwodwkYn b dayamanenef. NO)a.tatll bep¢manessamDeAetl ��¢�¢ApNlatlon pane. a5indaeINbpsoil NOTIFICATION AND INSPECTION INSPECTION: (f) TM IfMNiduel idamMeaa beLq 2zp«aiMa f «impemeMfp MaeMIm W1 AM. must mu11KIY IKPea Me mnawaon site -Ke avM'sehan OSb dual a24 t m,erucwn and wiMin 24 hmXa area nett- (2) A,,,,seliond and mainenans mr-0uekd duam ddnidm -mat be anbeed in wriUry sso Mae remNa must he,kited wM He..I.mmM pen and mode vaiebM at Me Diedles faquest will 21 tan. Rem'ds a ea¢n Insvewm aria mam+efanm.a.m -ball Inawa: (p ame Od,,, , ti�nll �mvealeK: p) N ape IWeel remmmantlallKa Mr mrrecmve -deans; rim Fmcln9eabapewcna, 9 Ov) e«REme demons Assn Ondatlin9 dress, 4osea tine Party noo lenty,almenanm ae,lb al: and (y One antl amount of-11a lal evens oRatsr Man 0.5 mcnea MZa roes. NOTIFICATION ". "onni W iA eutYanxad spent eneN n-4h Ma OictrictN w+ldn8 al tla Idlowin9 falnA (laf9e Wdin pr %see easy,,,d,d HdyRNd ,;also. Yem'6h use ePn an aria wrMen b9 soda fdlso PJA ): (f) on mmpieti ^9i'sAlletica efpeameAremei -n antladmenAtim+mfNds. (2) On mmple5ng Jar, stubbing. d,tano WMno Palo PA meaaums MrReal All (enbilvado, yamtltaawaeang. (4) WHen,esia Has an permenenly SkdlladarM n,- vepeAktl. (5) When all LemmRNerosion antl adimanewm mnven Have bean nmdved bent ,Belk. E0.0510N GONT Tw MCWD Pemmnea --1, be resmaiblo at al rimes Mr the mainAnem antl pd'Pat Hy e,hoon of all dream, and eydimd,I cone- maf�ma shda d uMm Nk Nknthe P«milleen Ahoobbebin9 ac,vay has -maned p,o,nerIt 1-a mn^' rell, caM adaeM a ,.in and Rpwill dlaWbe- auk dado al, mnmVm. acmipq Hanel pewees and a-ii sladlinE -n mmsuns eveNdeyw -rk is ce Me site. Soothe mdnkfam aminmems are as blows: (a) NJ&daed eel areas mgnorealogUed as soon As P -ssias roNmil -oil wsi -n bN in K cam later flan fa tlrya after Me oanswwon add+ib in Mat p-N«' of Me ses Nes semmnsY «am'aneMb mad. (b) The normal waled MoneM a shy emma" pemamntdreinepadishot —e that Met tlreim wMr (mm tre zha, mdrvaM1S weer a be A _dace weor. ppubpea It ma d�itrl' Mel must be mmpetsa thin 26hmrt afcmnecMS en under ceney,ads„^ust bd sWeliad anMin 26 hwm alter Me mfaWEdm acnvM ^ pawn has eased. sadMentEwN -t M -Ila3 muYminNNle aedMalRff -m aedn9 aNkawekra. Ind and none sewer 1Na. 'rtdudin9 curd and 9utlm.Y¢k„s (d) Sadmentmntrd Pm�eCmN bbRMbTZP,ftnewlceaa ah,lrc�Mcen sts. unGM em J,soiare entiM eMrdfg Diana nor deteminne Mat Me alts setts ova been pemarenurzablize -. (e) Tna 9Mnp a,e hakmemdn aeodimem prod. m.- aaluls kada. My amdmmodale shod+xm adesoaded ad wan see v -sbe e d the sedlmem mnwt son, alaft.refm ac4vitYhe"j.at,. bpd. µyedver. aedimentmnh -I tunes onotb immode,b en, Ma as, is Passed Pa pacmces must be ImAmod base eats nest PredP'tew' event even rile adNMs he mmpleed. (Y) Nl silt des lnleA must be psaddtl aY BMPS tleet A� a16Cn�nD binelel hero .Ppepdee, kol E- tabon", unm en sour —wan lode been aebl iced. ma eaSY thelewn wl,m 24 (p) pipe -uws tun he pdHded with temPP -Of rpm_ Hmm a mnMwm b-.arms ands' Mere shall be no anodes, (h) Malden- krtla WMadfeoleps, tea had,A 3rl«atseve. slope enpth a9m Q) TemphdY aef*Pled ease Has' eflawveaadmant aneds in PleceMDfe+ent dschaRa It surfacewakrs irtdWirg sMrmwnermrwaYan —ouch as lad antl 9uMr. �) VeHide tracklm asodlmMd M1-fn ha d«'s,uw -n a, must W minNnized by SMIN suds s mek ..O-h ,hMaa. wash Ras or.AANttlanIl fpm LAO OnORSlle. mart by lad It ach 6MPS are nor adequaA ro pavan a (aedment mnbdte must be used Mpntvent He Unto foams ofsadiment ��l -tla '..over, and fMltl the mnldbuEfg drelne9e aRe(d elltalw� mns'WdaC enannaly sla,lll sad final9Rtle (9 D ii. tedm «basin dRMM9(e 9- pumped dlsdef96s.bmwMit,heju Mrd.ina9e) Rlatsd M Me mnzMwm -n aaMilY that they Hol ,,entabonn thane, Mal ale wtaneudr mot be ,J,,R gAd e a temmRN -rm^^e t m duhaae fiat atiad%et9 ®e -noes mil ce nmtb tl ldasetlimetrtG -ppmelble.lfwam weer, It meat be Leased with Nosameepd (A JIM mskntldwners. a Mates, enea MarmM.g wa m (m) Hdek,ninod,De mnPecAtl Lyle OwMa. silo sea all be demmaeted M a depo' a 16 inehae and orgaNC matlerahell be iK«PORktl beMn reveabtlon.Oecpmawm elan w a�yPehed slob by MCmmm,,, a,,,i miter within Me aril Iine acntlal as dos a bees, with, 19 eaa.,st ntmd ubl Les. and (n)IOla to shot ds,oba a,e dRa w —n,P, Mil be mainbned one setliodent amumasta to a del ins" a __- W wKwinevedt»m ROBE CON6ULTND ENDINEERS,IXV m a e a e PLANNERS end LAND EJRVEYOR6 me a,A,aa wanaoi PING IN eE R IN G COMP RNYe INC. ( IWO EAST 165, STREET, SURm,,,,J MINNESOTA 5533] PH (952)632 –JD09 usnIm Itts rs�.�fnwa SILT FENCE KENT FRIEDRICHSEN 5913 PARCELS ROAD MOUND MN Wea aoa cDNStxe N� EROSION CO OL NOTES AND DETAILS BRISSION WOODS 2 0 m