The URL can be used to link to this page

2013-06-11 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 2013 - 7:00 I'M REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the ConsentAgenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims *B. Approve minutes: May 28, 2013 regular meeting *C. Approve for 2013 Dog Days Westonka, Aug 17, 2013, with fees paid: 1. Public Gathering Permit *D. Approve Resolution Approving Public Lands Permit from Zach Augustine for 2648 Shannon Lane *E. Approve Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for 4309 Wilshire Boulevard *F. Approve Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for 4313 Wilshire Boulevard *G. Approve Resolution Awarding Contract for the 2013 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project, City Project No. PW -13 -06 to Michaels Corporation, in the amount of $196,663.00 *H. Approve Pay Request No. 9 from GMH Asphalt Corporation, in the amount of $22,266.17, for work completed on the 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement Project, City Project No's. PW- 12 -01, PW -12 -03 and PW -12 -04 *I. Approve Pay Request No. 1 from GMH Asphalt Corporation, in the amount of $340,552.34, for work completed on the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project, City Project No's. PW- 13 -01, PW -13 -02 and PW -13 -05 1412 -1429 1430 -1435 1436 1437 -1443 1444 -1487 1444 -1487 1488 -1489 1490 -1491 1492 -1493 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Tim Litfin, representing Tour de Tonka, scheduled for Sat, Aug 2, 2013. 1494 -1514 7. Jay Green, Representative to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD), 1515 -1530 requesting approval of Right -of -Entry Authorization for Watercraft Inspection Agreement with LMCD. 8. Sarah Smith, Community Devel Dir, with Planning Commission Recommendations 1531 -1543 A. Discussion/action on Planning Case No. 13-17 Applicant Representative: HR Green Conditional Use Permit — 6270 Westedge Boulevard Essential Service Buildings — Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Wastewater Treatment Facility /Site 9. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, requesting the following: A. Action on Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the Mound City Code as it 1544 -1546 Relates to Alcoholic Beverages B. Action on Resolution Authorizing Publication of an Ordinance by Title 1547 and Summary, as it Relates to Alcoholic Beverages C. Action on Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 08 -2003 Implementing 1548 -1549 an Electric Franchise Fee on Northern States Power D /B /A Xcel Energy for Providing Electric Service within the City of Mound D. Action on Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 05 -2003 Implementing 1550 a Gas Franchise Fee on Centerpoint Energy Minnegasco for Providing Gas Service within the City of Mound E. Action on Resolution Amending Resolution No. 13 -35 Resolution Amending 1551 Resolution No. 12 -107 Adopting Fee Schedule. F. Action on Resolution to Permit Overnight Parking in Auditor's Road 1552 -1554 District by Permit Only for Lost Lake Slip License Holders. G. Set committee to meet with City of Wayzata on participation in a Lake 1555 -1565 Minnetonka Regional Scenic Byway, to include City Manager 10. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Parks and Open Space Commission: April 11, 2013 1566 -1567 Planning Commission: May 7, 2013 1568 -1570 Planning Commission: May 21, 2013 1571 C. Reports: Metropolitan Council 2012 population estimate 1572 -1573 Vehicle Compliance Agreement policy amendment 1574 D. Correspondence: PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City ofMound web site: www.cityofmound. com. City of Mound Claims 06 -11 -13 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2013 061113CITY $ 1101218.49 2013 HWS06112013 $ 70,964.75 2013 KENGRAV03 $ 51168.50 TOTAL CLAIMS $ 186,351.74 -1412- S: \FINANCE DEPT \AP \CITY COUNCIL CLAIMS LISTING 2013.xisx 06 -11 -13 MOUND, MN Payments Current Period: June 2013 Batch Name 061113CITY User DollarAmt $110,218.49 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $110,218.49 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ALLIED WASTE _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose JUNE 2013 GARBAGE SVC PUB SAFETY BLDG Invoice 0894 - 003198918 5/25/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose JUNE 2013 GARBAGE SVC PUB SAFETY BLDG Invoice 0894 - 003198918 5/2512013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Dispose JUNE 2013 GARBAGE SVC PUB WRKS BLDG Invoice 0894- 003198920 5/25/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa JUNE 2013 GARBAGE SVC CITY HALL Invoice 0894 - 003196136 5125/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa JUNE 2013 GARBAGE SVC PARKS BLDG Invoice 0894 - 003196662 5/25/2013 Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -440 Other Contractual Servic MAY 2013 CITYWIDE RECYCLING SVC Invoice 0894- 003195781 5/25/2013 Transaction Date 5/812013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 41 ANDERSON, ANDY _ Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs REIMB REPLACE PLANTINGS DESTROYED Invoice 06112013 6/6/2013 Transaction Date 616/2013 Refer _ _ 3 BALSAM LAKE PRO LAWN, INC. Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -232 Landscape Material Invoice 2498 5/24/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 8 BARRETT, DAVID & SUZANNE Cash Payment E 401 - 43113 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 06112013 6/4/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 39 BAYSIDE FLORAL Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 3292 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 3292 5/30/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 4 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTROO _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W493493 5/29/2013 2012 STREET IMPROV PROJ -3001 BRIGHTON BLVD A. ANDERSON Project PW1201 Wells Fargo 10100 Total WAVE PETUNIA BASKETS - DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE 06/06/13 2:04 PM Page 1 $113.83 $113.83 $113.40 $117.98 $202.86 $12,991.77 $13,653.67 $270.18 $270.18 $770.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $770.00 PROPERTY EASEMENTS - 2854 ESSEX $101.52 LANE - 2013 IMPROV PROJ PW 13 -01 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101.52 FRESH ARRANGEMENTS- J. NELSON OPEN $43.45 HOUSE FRESH ARRANGEMENTS- J. NELSON OPEN $43.44 HOUSE Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.89 CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $34.76 MAY 25 - 28 2013 -1413- MOUND, MN 06/06/13 2:04 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: June 2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) MOUND BAY PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $263.41 MAY 25 - 28 2013 Invoice W493494 5129/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC MAY 25 - $36.29 28 2013 Invoice W493495 5/29/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $334.46 Refer - 50 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PAM _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials GREASE GUN COUPLER $6.10 Invoice 6974- 202655 5/1/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -230 Shop Materials 5W -20 OIL & FILTERS -'13 Ford F150 #113 $75.97 Invoice 6974- 202708 51212013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials COUPLINGS W/O -RINGS $17.45 Invoice 6974- 202788 5/3/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials OIL, FUEL & AIR FILTERS #804 $35.25 Invoice 6974 - 203304 5/1012013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials AIR FILTERS #604 $19.26 Invoice 6974 - 203718 5/17/2013 Project 13 -3 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $154.03 Refer 2 CENTERPOINT ENERGY(MINNEG _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR $21.51 NATL GAS SVC 4 -19 -13 THRU 5 -20 -13 Invoice 06112013 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities 4791 NORTHERN RD LS D1 GENERATOR $17.22 NATL GAS SVC 4 -19 -13 THRU 5 -20 -13 Invoice 06112013 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 4 -19 -13 $16.51 THRU 5 -20 -13 Invoice 06112013 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS B1 GENERATOR $17.94 NATL GAS SVC 4 -20 -13 THRU 5 -20 -13 Invoice 06112013 5123/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $20.08 GAS SVC 4 -19 -13 THRU 5 -20 -13 Invoice 06112013 5/23/2013 Transaction Date 4/3/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 ._ , ,. ....ems . ,.., ., _ .... ........... w ..... �, .. Refer 36 DONOVAN, DAN Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND WATER BILL OVERPYMT -2551 LAKEWOOD LANE -D. DONOVAN Invoice 06112013 615/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 42 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS _ Cash Payment G 101 -23231 6301 Lynwood #10 -07, Wood 2 LETTERS OF CREDIT /BANK REVIEW WOODLYN RIDGE PROJECT Invoice 06112013 4/30/2013 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Refer_ 40 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -329 Sirens /Phone Linesl Total $93.26 $70.00 Total $70.00 $400.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 6 MONTH 3 SIRENS MTCE FEE- 7 -1 -13 TO 12- 31-13 Invoice 33228 5120/2013 -1414- $400.00 $753.12 MOUND,MN Payments Current Period: June 2013 06/06113 2:04 PM Page 3 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $753.12 Refer 5 FIVE TECHNOLOGY _ Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY MANAGED SVC & NETWORK $1,800.00 MTCE- JUNE 2013 Invoice 127179 6/1/2013 Transaction Date 6/512013 Refer 43 FOLEY, MIKE Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -212 Motor Fuels Invoice 06112013 6/4/2013 Transaction Date 61612013 Refer 7 FOSS, ALEXANDER L _ Cash Payment E 401 - 43113 -300 Professional Srvs Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,800.00 REIMB M. FOLEY FUEL -SUPER AMERICA 6 -2- $11.00 13 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11.00 PROPERTY EASEMENTS - 4643 HAMPTON RD- 20131MPROV PROJ PW 13 -01 Invoice 06112013 6/4/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 11 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 5 -20 -13 THRU 6- 20-13 Invoice 3975234 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 3975234 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 3975234 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 5 -20 -13 THRU 6- 20 -13 NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 5 -20 -13 THRU 6- 20-13 NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 5 -20 -13 THRU 6- 20 -13 Invoice 3975234 5/20/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo Refer 10 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 602 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/3012013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 06112013 5/30/2013 10100 Total PHONE SVC 5/30/13 TO 6129/13 PARKS PHONE SVC 5130/13 TO 6/29/13 LIFT STATION PHONE SVC 5/30113 TO 6/29/13 HWS PHONE SVC 5/30113 TO 6/29/13 CITY HALL PHONE SVC 5130/13 TO 6/29/13 PUB WKS PHONE SVC 5130/13 TO 6/29/13 PUB WKS PHONE SVC 5/30/13 TO 6/29/13 PUB WKS PHONE SVC 5/30/13 TO 6/29/13 POLICE PHONE SVC 5/30/13 TO 6/29/13 FIRE -1415- $1,525.10 $1,525.10 $160.11 $160.11 $160.11 $320.23 $800.56 $117.75 $62.28 $569.29 $921.36 $445.72 $432.60 $432.60 $307.12 $307.12 MOUND, MN Payments 06106/13 2:04 PM Page 4 Current Period: June 2013 Transaction Date 6/512013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,595.84 _. _.. , ...,..— , . -, ..... .,...,n_ .... ..... , .. ..., , ,�. ...... 11 _Refer_ 14 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 5 -27 -13 CITY HALL $167.49 Invoice 1006535443 5/2712013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 5 -27 -13 LIQUOR $87.31 STORE Invoice 1006535438 5/27/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006546687 613/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006535444 5/27/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006535444 5/27/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 _Refer 13 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006524007 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006524007 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006524007 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006524007 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006535442 5/2712013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006535442 5/2712013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006535442 5/27/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006535442 5/27/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 12 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -395 Gopher One -Call Invoice 71973 5131/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -395 Gopher One -Call Invoice 71973 5/31/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 52 HA_USER, TEDD & JULIE Cash Payment E 401 - 43113 -300 Professional Srvs MAT SVC 6 -3 -13 LIQUOR STORE $58.58 UNIFORM SVC 5 -27 -13 PARKS $45.48 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -27 -13 PARKS $72.82 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $431.68 UNIFORM SVC 5 -20 -13 $24.40 UNIFORM SVC 5 -20 -13 $24.80 UNIFORM SVC 5 -20 -13 $35.59 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -20 -13 $436.54 Project 13 -3 UNIFORM SVC 5 -27 -13 $24.40 UNIFORM SVC 5 -27 -13 $24.80 UNIFORM SVC 5 -27 -13 $35.59 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -27 -13 $147.48 Project 13 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $753.60 MAY 2013 LOCATES MAY 2013 LOCATES Wells Fargo 10100 $192.90 $192.90 Total $385.80 PROPERTY EASEMENT - 4631 PAISLEY RD- 2013 IMPROV PROJ PW 13- 01- HAUSER Invoice 06112013 6/6/2013 Project PW1301 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 6 HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY _ Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners CORRECTIONS & REHAB ROOM & BOARD APRIL 2013 Invoice 1000031033 5/24/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fe -- - 10100 Total $1 ,741.73 $1,741.73 $332.00 $332.00 [IT,[oil] ; IRA IT, IV Payments 06106/13 2:04 PM Page 5 Current Period: June 2013 . _ ..,. ., .. Refer 44 _HERDEGEN, CHRISTOFER _ Cash Payment E 401- 43113 -300 Professional Srvs PERMANENT EASEMENT FIRE HYDRANT- $62.63 4695 HAMPTON RD- HERDEGEN -PW 13 -01 Invoice 06112013 613/2013 Project PW1301 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 17 NOISING TON KOEGLER GROUP, ROUP, l - Cash Payment G 101 -23275 METCOUNCIL: 6270 WEST MCES 6270 WESTEDGE CUP PLANNING SVCS MAY 2013 Invoice 007 - 005 -58 6/3/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23277 VOGEL - WILSHIRE #2013 -15 4309 -4313 WILSHIRE ADJ & EP PLANNING SVCS MAY 2013 Invoice 007- 005 -58 6/3/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 007 - 001 -61 6/3/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer_ 15 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INC_OR Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice MIN06130548 6/1/2013 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice MIN06130549 6/1/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 18 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 670- 49500 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 00140719 5/11/2013 Cash Payment E 670- 49500 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 00201116 5/11/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 00170723 5122/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 00641113 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 00140719 5/11/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 9 KIVISTO, SCOTT - - - Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 06112013 6/3/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 _Refer 19 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -433 Dues and Subscriptions Invoice 06112013 5128/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 20 LAKESHORE WEEKLY COMMUNIC MISC PLANNING SVCS MAY 2013 $62.63 $62.25 $456.50 $249.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $767.75 MONTHLY CONTRACT CLEANING CITY HALL $508.73 JUNE 2013 MONTHLY CONTRACT CLEANING PUB $271.73 WRKS BLDG JUNE 2013 Project 13 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $780.46 RECYCLE -CLEAN UP LUNCH, BEVERAGES 5- $81.28 11 -13 RECYCLE -CLEAN UP LUNCH, BEVERAGES 5- $69.29 11 -13 FIRE COMMISSION MTG - COOKIES, POP, $16.33 NAPKINS J. NELSON OPEN HOUSE 5 -30 -13 $44.19 J. NELSON OPEN HOUSE 5 -30 -13 $44.19 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $255.28 EDUCATION REIMS- 14 CREDITS -2012 $70.00 CLASSES S. KIVISTO Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70.00 3RD QTR 2013 LMCD LEVY PAYMENT $5,469.50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,469.50 -1417- MOUND, MN 06/06/132:04 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: June 2013 .y.- .::,... ... Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -340 Advertising LOST LAKE DOCK SLIPS AVAILABLE 2 X 3" $72.00 AD- 5 -28 -13 Invoice 00132133 5/28/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.00 53 LEXIS NEXIS RISK DATA MGMT IN _ _Refer Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -400 Repairs& Maintenance RISK DATA MGMT MONTHLY ACCESS FEE $30.00 JAN 2013 Invoice 12246742013013 1/31/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -400 Repairs & Maintenance RISK DATA MGMT MONTHLY ACCESS FEE $30.00 FEB 2013 Invoice 12246742013022 2128/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -400 Repairs & Maintenance RISK DATA MGMT MONTHLY ACCESS FEE $30.00 MARCH 2013 Invoice 12246742013033 3/31/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -42110 -400 Repairs & Maintenance RISK DATA MGMT MONTHLY ACCESS FEE $30.00 APRIL 2013 Invoice 12246742013043 4/30/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -400 Repairs & Maintenance RISK DATA MGMT MONTHLY ACCESS FEE $30.00 MAY 2013 Invoice 12246742013053 5/31/2013 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 Refer 21 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER $18.74 B & WHT OVERAGE 5 -10 THRU 6 -9 -13 Invoice 1577631 6/3/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 4TH FLOOR COPIER $18.73 B & WHT OVERAGE 5 -10 THRU 6 -9 -13 Invoice 1577631 6/312013 Project 13 -3 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.47 Refer 45 METRO FIRE Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -500 Capital Outlay FA CHARGER CRADLE ASSEMBLY -FD $192.37 Invoice 47269 5/15/2013 PO 24248 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.37 Refer 34 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE - _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES JULY 2013 $47,720.38 Invoice 0001019038 6/5/2013 Transaction Date 6/512013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47,720.38 Refer 23 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTYMANA _ Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -433 Dues and Subscriptions MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL K. HANSON MCMA $135.53 5 -1 -13 THRU 4 -30 -14 Invoice 06112013 6/4/2013 Transaction Date 6/512013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $135.53 Refer TA DEPT OF HEALTH_ _ _2_2 _MINNESO Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -37170 State fee -Water 2ND QTR 2013 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,793.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Invoice 06112013 5/21/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,793.00 Refer 24 MINNESOTA LABOR INDUSTRY _ - -.__ -- __._ -1418- MOUND, MN 06/06/13 2:04 PM Page 7 Payments Current Period: June 2013 Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -438 Licenses and Taxes 2013 CITY HALL ELEVATOR OPERATING $100.00 PERMIT Invoice ALR00282161 5/17/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 Refer_ 25 NELSON, JOYCE _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -430 Miscellaneous EYEWEAR REIMS. J. NELSON $50.00 Invoice 06112013 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -430 Miscellaneous MILEAGE REIMS. J. NELSON 1 -1 -13 THIRD 5- $53.68 Refer 38 STOESZ, JUHL & JENNIFER 30 -13 Invoice 06112013 5/23/2013 PROPERTY EASEMENTS - 3057 INVERNESS $2,096.58 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $103.68 Refer NORLANDER, JILL _ __26 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -305 Medical Services EYEWEAR REIMS. J. NORLANDER $50.00 Invoice 06112013 5/23/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 27 NO_VACK, K_AYDI & JOE Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits REFUND DOCK KEY DEPOSIT- J & K $50.00 NOVACK Invoice 06112013 6/4/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 28 OFFICEDEPOT _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -200 Office Supplies LASER JET CARTRIDGES, COLORED COPY $329.75 PAPER Invoice 659313665001 5/29/2013 PO 23445 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $329.75 Refer 29 RANDYS SANITATION _ Cash Payment E 670- 49500 -460 Janitorial Services REMOVE 40 YD RECYCLE ELECTRONICS 5- $1,592.80 13 -13 Invoice 1806836 5/29/2013 Transaction Date 615/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,592.80 Refer 46 RIDGEVIE_W MEDICAL, WACONIA _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -300 Professional Srvs DEDICATED AMBULANCE @ MFD LIVE $370.00 BURN 4 -27 -13 Invoice 06112013 5/1012013 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $370.00 Refer 37 SELTZ, JOEL Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -500 Capital Outlay FA REIMBURSE TREE TRIMMING ON $214.55 COMMONS- 1601 PARADISE LANE- J. SELTZ Invoice 06112013 6/312013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $214.55 Refer 30 SOUTHWEST TRAILS ASSOCIATIO _ Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow SW TRAILS ASSOC 2013 PMT #3 5 -30 -13 $7,735.60 Invoice 0001213384 5/30/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,735.60 Refer 38 STOESZ, JUHL & JENNIFER _ Cash Payment E 401- 43113 -300 Professional Srvs PROPERTY EASEMENTS - 3057 INVERNESS $2,096.58 LANE -2013 IMPROV PROJ PW 13 -01 invoice 06112013 6/1/2013 -1419- 06/06/13 2:04 PM Page 8 Current Period: June 2013 Transaction Date 6/512013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,096.58 Refer 47 STRETCHER S Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 11014835 4/2512013 PO 24243 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 11014836 4/25/2013 PO 24243 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 11015625 4/29/2013 PO 24243 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -500 Capital Outlay FA LIGHTS, LIGHTBAR, CONSOLE, MOUNTING, $554.96 SIREN- SET UP NEW TAHOE #42 LIGHTS, LIGHTBAR, CONSOLE, MOUNTING, $469.92 SIREN- SET UP NEW TAHOE #42 LIGHTS, LIGHTBAR, CONSOLE, MOUNTING, $540.96 SIREN- SET UP NEW TAHOE #42 LIGHTS, LIGHTBAR, CONSOLE, MOUNTING, $3,278.92 SIREN- SET UP NEW TAHOE #42 Invoice 11021537 5/20/2013 PO 24243 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 31 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE PUBLISHED 5- 4 & 5 -11 -13 Invoice 1158278 -2 5/11/2013 Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -351 Legal Notices Publishing PUBLISH ORDINANCE AMENDING WATERWAYS CODE 5 -25 -13 Invoice 1164867 5/25/2013 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -351 Legal Notices Publishing STORMWATER PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 5- 25-13 Invoice 1164940 5/2512013 Cash Payment E 101- 41110 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 1163442 5/1812013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 33 SWARTZER, BRIAN Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms J. NELSON RETIREMENT OPEN HOUSE NOTICE Wells Fargo 10100 Total 2013 BOOT ALLOWANCE REIMBURSEMENT B. SWARTZER Invoice 06112013 5/24/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total _Refer 49 THN ENTERPRISES Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic TUG & DREDGE w /OPERATORS TO LOST LAKE- P/U HAZARD- NONE FOUND Invoice 1401 5/24/2013 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Refer 51 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 103875 5/212013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 103882 5/2/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 103885 5/2/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 103967 5/2/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 104084 5/8/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 12 PT SOCKET 1/2" WTR TIGHT CONNECTOR 3 PK CONDUIT LOCKNUT SOAP, TRASH BAGS, CLEAR TAPE VOLLEYBALL & TENNIS NET HARDWARE -1420- $4,844.76 $229.98 $80.85 $33.08 $163.00 $506.91 $150.00 $150.00 $714.00 $714.00 $5.12 $10.24 $1.38 $45.88 $33.63 I IT, WI]L,IamI41 1 Payments Current Period: June 2013 06/06/13 2:04 PM Page 9 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -210 Operating Supplies 15 CT ZIPLOCK BAGS $4.80 Invoice 104097 5/9/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -210 Operating Supplies DOCKS -MULTI SLIP KEYS $42.54 Invoice 104267 5113/2013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -230 Shop Materials Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -210 Operating Supplies T PRO MEASURE -DOCKS $112.21 Invoice 104411 5/16/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies KEYS $4.25 Invoice 104591 5/2112013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply GALV UNIONS, ADAPTER, CYLINDER, $70.49 Invoice 104494 5/17/2013 TUBING CUTTER E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 104331 5/14/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 104556 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 104565 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 104566 5/20/2013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 104648 5/22/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 104943 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 104948 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 104172 5/10/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 104319 5/14/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 104494 5/17/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 104747 5/24/2013 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Refer 16 VERIZON_W_IR_ELESS _ Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds Invoice 9704861646 5/13/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9704861646 5/13/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9704861646 5113/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9704861646 5/13/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9704861646 5/13/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9704861646 5/13/2013 BOAT COVER $33.12 SCREWS, NUTS, FOR HISTORICAL SIGNS $3.80 WATER SAMPLES - UPS /FED EX SHIPPING $29.66 ELECTRIC TAPE, POLY TUBES $38.04 SIGN SHOP TOOL BOX $29.91 SASH CORD $19.23 LEATHER GLOVES $4.98 WORK GLOVES, CLEAR TAPE $15.06 SUPER SHOCK $25.59 8 PK AA ALK BATTERIES $8.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $537.93 CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THRU 5 -13- $33.13 2013 IKM CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THRU 5 -13- $219.95 2013 STREETS CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THRU 5 -13- $210.08 2013 WATER CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THRU 5 -13- $204.12 2013 SEWER CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THRU 5 -13- $21.22 2013P &I CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THRU 5 -13- $126.01 2013 PARKS -1421- MOUND, MN Payments 06/06/13 2:04 PM Page 10 Current Period: June 2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THIRD 5 -13- $73.82 2013 CITY MGR Invoice 9704861646 5/13/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9704861646 5113/2013 Transaction Date 4/25/2013 Refer 32 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 473169915 5128/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer_ 35 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 473116535 5/24/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Refer 48 ZACKS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 28643 5128/2013 PO 24250 Transaction Date 616/2013 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND CELL PHONE CHARGES 4 -14 -13 THIRD 5 -13- $100.94 2013 FIRE Wells Fargo 10100 Total $989.27 ELECTRIC SVC CARLOW RD K -1 LIFT $83.98 STATION 4 -27 TO 5 -26 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $83.98 COMMERCE BLVD STREET LIGHTS $49.79 ELECTRIC USAGE 4 -24 TO 5 -23 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $49.79 WASHBAY SUPPLIES FOR FIRE TRUCKS- $128.08 WASH BRUSH, HANDLES, SQUEEGEE Wells Fargo 10100 Total $128.08 10100 Wells Fargo $24,295.12 $6,244.54 $57727 $5,797.74 $7,259.47 $50,181.07 $1,095.06 $14,735.14 $33.08 $110,218.49 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $110,218.49 Total $110,218.49 -1422- Payments Current Period: June 2013 06106/13 1:10 PM Page 1 Batch Name HWS06112013 User Dollar Amt $70,964.75 E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Payments Computer Dollar Amt $70,964.75 Cash Payment $0.00 In Balance LIQUOR Refer 2 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $178.36 Invoice 461314303 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 461314303 5/23/2013 614/2013 Wells Fargo Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $136.96 Invoice 461314906 5/29/2013 E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 61684 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 461314906 5/29/2013 BEER Invoice 61685 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $317.32 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION Wells Fargo Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- C -FOLD TOWELS, SHELF STRIPS Invoice 88473500 5/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX, JUICE Invoice 88478700 5/28/2013 Gash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- BAGS Invoice 88505200 5/3112013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX, JUICE, LEMONS, LIMES Invoice 88510900 6/3/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 78348100 5124/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 78362400 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 78432300 5/31/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 78452300 6/3/2013 Transaction Date 614/2013 Wells Fargo Refer - 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 61684 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale BEER Invoice 61685 5/23/2013 Transaction Date 6/412013 Wells Fargo Refer 6 BLUSKYPUBLISHING 10100 10100 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -340 Advertising 114 PAGE AD JUNE 2013 WEST LAKE BUSINESS PUBLICATION Invoice 15233 5/3012013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 _Refer 7 COCA COLA _BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX Invoice 0148050106 5/23/2013 -1423- Total Total Total Total $59.00 $84.00 $172.65 $130.51 $446.16 $1,01229 $6,301.15 $1,417.15 $6,595.29 $15,330.88 $163.20 $53.30 $216.50 $130.00 $130.00 $216.00 MOUND, MN 06/06113 1:10 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: June 2013 Transaction Date 6/412013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $216.00 Refer 8 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2037043 5/28/2013 $661.60 Invoice 12721 6/3/2013 MIX Invoice 2084572 5/28/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $661.60 Refer - DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY _ Invoice 2038064 513112013 Cash Payment _9 E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2093408 5/31/2013 $7.50 Invoice 703060 5/29/2013 Wells Fargo Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1577514 5/22/2013 $3,357.48 Invoice 703061 5/29/2013 WINE Invoice 1577513 5/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $234.80 Invoice 702580 512412013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,068.15 Invoice 704046 6/4/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $103.10 Invoice 704047 6/4/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,771.03 Refer 10 EXTREME BEVERAGE _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $189.00 Invoice W761510 5/29/2013 Transaction Date 614/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.00 HOHENST_EINS, INCORPORATED _ _Refer_ _11 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $543.50 Invoice 649403 5/23/2013 Transaction Date 6/412013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $543.50 ., �_- n n i rn vi no nrc- rorrzr mn�r_ nnrnrnr Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2037043 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 2084572 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2037042 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2038064 513112013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2093408 5/31/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1577514 5/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1577513 5/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1577512 5122/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 1577515 5/22/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells F,_14 10100 $38.25 $105.00 $3,062.59 $84.00 $24.55 Total $3,314.39 $4,289.03 $2,284.95 $2,717.59 $34.25 10100 Total $9,325.82 MOUND, MN 06/06/13 1:10 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: June 2013 Refer 13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $60.50 Invoice 1584524 5130/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,262.82 Invoice 1584521 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $735.00 Invoice 1584520 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,342.10 Invoice 1584522 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $377.60 Invoice 1584523 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,989.29 Invoice 1584525 5/3012013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $0.00 Invoice 1575071 5/23/2013 Transaction Date 6/412013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,767.31 Refer 15 MARLIN STRUCKING DELIVERY _ _ Cash Payment E 509- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 5 -6 -13 $60.90 Invoice 28313 5/6/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 5 -2 -13 $212.75 Invoice 28299 5/2/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 5 -9 -13 $385.50 Invoice 28330 5/9/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $659.15 Refer 16 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAIN_TENA _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 5 -6 -13 $65.19 Invoice 928011039 5/26/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65.19 Refer 17 MOUND, CITY OF _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -382 Water Utilities WATER SERVICE 4 -2 -13 THRU 5 -2 -13 HWS $45.33 Invoice 06112013 5124/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.33 Refer 18 MUZAK- MINNEAPOLIS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic JUNE MUSIC SERVICE $111.61 Invoice A114795 6/1/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.61 Refer 19 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,116.80 Invoice 8401455 5128/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $41.25 Invoice 8401455 5/28/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,158.05 20 PHILLIPS _WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ r wv _Refer_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $333.00 Invoice 2426544 5122/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,081.10 Invoice 2426543 5/22/2013 -1425- MOUND, MN 06/06/131:10 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: June 2013 Transaction Date 6/412013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,414.10 Refer 21 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $51125 Invoice 2430786 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,004.10 Invoice 2430787 5/30/2013 BEER Invoice 754847 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,515.35 Refer 22 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED Invoice 754727 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic CONTRACTED PEST CONTROL SVC 5 -3 -13 $50.02 Invoice 754727 5/28/2013 HWS- 2135 COMMERCE Cash Payment Invoice 3659167 6/1/2013 Transaction Date 614/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer_ 23 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 5 -31 & 6- 15-13 EDITIONS Invoice 164273 5/22/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Refer 24 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 1035696 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 1035695 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 1037699 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 1038728 5/31/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Refer 25 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Wells Fargo 10100 WINE LIQUOR WINE LIQUOR Wells Fargo Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 754728 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 00770963 5/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 754847 5/31/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 754727 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Invoice 754727 5/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 755497 513012013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo Refer 26 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. Total 10100 Total 10100 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies REGISTER PAPER ROLLS Invoice 487 5/29/2013 Transaction Date 614/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 27 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED SEA Total Total $50.02 $30.00 $30.00 $1,077.00 $1,046.86 $512.00 $440.95 $3,076.81 $3,299.30 $48.00 $647.00 $127.95 $9.00 $420.00 $4,551.25 $57.50 $57.50 MOUND, MN 06/06/13 1 10 PM Page 5 Payments SALE Invoice 163052 5/2012013 Current Period: June 2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer - 32 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1090053763 5129/2013 $112.00 Invoice 0077752 5/2312013 BEER $37.50 Invoice 1090053764 5/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT BEER $9.00 Invoice 0077752 5/2312013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $424.00 Invoice 0077752 5/23/2013 Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $440.00 Invoice 0078023 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.00 Invoice 0078023 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.50 Invoice 0077753 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft DrinkslMix For Resa MIX $220.50 Invoice 0077753 5/23/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,228.00 Refer_ 28 WINECO_MPANY_ _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $624.00 Invoice 330601 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $11.55 Invoice 330601 5/23/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $635.55 Refer 29 WINE CONNECT _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising JUNE 2013 HWS WEBSITE $95.12 Invoice 1111 6/1/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.12 Refer 30 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $352.00 Invoice 456425 5/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,200.40 Invoice 457433 5/30/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,552.40 31 WINE NEWS INCORPORATED _Refer_ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE ENTHUSIAST JUNE 2013 ISSUES FOR $15.00 SALE Invoice 163052 5/2012013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer - 32 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,825.90 Invoice 1090053763 5129/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $37.50 Invoice 1090053764 5/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $339.00 Invoice 1090053765 5/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,000.00 Invoice 1090054566 5/30/2013 Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,202.40 Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI -- - - - -- -1427- MOUND, MN 06106/13 1:10 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: June 2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $443.10 Invoice 1080042167 5/2312013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $271.50 Invoice 1080042166 5/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $570.00 Invoice 1080044645 5/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,987.81 Invoice 1080044644 5/3012013 _ Transaction Date 6/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,272.41 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $70,964.75 $70,964.75 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $70,964.75 Total $70,964.75 MOUND, MN Payments Current Period: June 2013 06/06/13 1:35 PM Page 1 Batch Name KENGRAV03 User Dollar Amt $5,168.50 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $5,168.50 $0.00 In Balance Refer 3 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & I PROPOSED DRIVEWAY EASEMENT- 5212 $1,011.00 LYNWOOD LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2013 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SERVICES MARCH $1,320.00 2013 Invoice 113788 4/2612013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -314 Legal P/W PUBLIC WORKS LEGAL SERVICES MARCH $213.00 2013 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -318 Legal Parks PARKS LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 2013 $912.00 Invoice 113788 4126/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23231 6301 Lynwood #10 -07, Wood WOODLYN RIDGE LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2013 $140.00 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES MARCH 2013 $282.00 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -304 Legal Fees T- MOBILE SITE CHANGES LEGAL SVCS $60.00 MARCH 2013 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23272 SALITERMAN: #13 -04 to #13 LOST LAKE HOMES & MARINA LEGAL SVCS $980.00 MARCH 2013 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23266 Windsor Road WINDSOR RD VARIANCE APP LEGAL SVCS $48.00 MARCH 2013 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23274 AEROTRAVEL - 2630 COM 2630 COMMERCE BLVD LEGAL SVCS $108.00 MARCH 2013 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23275 METCOUNCIL: 6270 WEST MCES MET COUNCIL 6270 WESTEDGE $94.50 LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2013 Invoice 113788 4/26/2013 Transaction Date 6/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,168.50 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $5,168.50 $5,168.50 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $5,168.50 Total $5,168.50 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 28, 2013 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, May 28, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kell! Glllispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None. Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, City Attorney Sarah Sonsalla, Pam Myers, Matt Wlllette, Jeremy Wlllette, Jay Green, Lindy Crawford, Blaze Fugina, Neal Henderson, Steve McDonald. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda Wegscheid requested the removal of item 4C for discussion. Hanus requested the removal of item 4D for discussion. MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $189,511.01. B. Approve minutes of the May 14, 2012 regular meeting. C. (removed) D. (removed) E. Approve for 2013 Spirit of the Lakes applications, with fees waived: 1. Parade Permit 2. Public Gathering Permit -1430- Mound City Council Minutes — May 28, 2013 3. Public Dance /Live Music Permit 4. Temporary On -Sale Liquor License 5. Temporary Sign Permit 6. Fireworks Display Permit Approve Public Gathering Permit for Fishers of Men — MN Division Annual Bass Tournament Weigh -In, for entire beach area at Centerview Park on Saturday, June 8, 2013, with fees paid. F. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Liberty Triathlon (bike portion) on Saturday, June 8, 2013, with fees paid. 4C. Mark Wegsheid requested this item be removed for discussion and stated he would like more information from the LMCD on whether this program has been successful. Hanus stated permission was granted last year. Hanus said two where pointed out on his boat when he pulled it out and he found more when he removed it from storage. Hanus said that we would not want inspections to occur during the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. He asked what the noise level of the high pressure pumps were. Hanus invited Jay Green, Mound LMCD Representative, to provide his thoughts. Jay Green stated Surfside would have level 1 temporary hire inspectors and there would not be a level 2 wash station. Inspections would only occur on weekends. Wegscheid asked what the protocol was if AIS was found. Green stated they could give a temporary permit to go to a temporary wash station as it is against the law to transport AIS on roads. Level 1 inspectors are not able to stop infected craft from entering the water, but they are trained to call Level 2 inspectors, who are. Wegscheid asked to get together with Jay Green. Gillispie asked the typical inspection hours. Green estimated from 7:00 am — 4:00 pm. Salazar asked what AIS eat. Hanus stated the water clarity improves but keeping the eco- balance is the challenge. Salazar asked about impact on boats. Green stated zebra mussels get into the water intakes and cause problems and that the process to clean them out is difficult. Wegscheid asked if there are paints or metals that repel them. Green said studies are ongoing and that the results appear very situational. Hanus stated Lake Michigan is so clear the light infiltration is disturbing the plant life. Wegsheid stated that with the large duck population as potential spreaders of AIS, he questions whether the inspection effort is futile. Green recommended not focusing on zebra mussels and milfoil. Other threats are on the horizon and that with over 900K registered boats in Minnesota, relatively few lakes are infested, so he believes the program is having an impact. Ultimately, Green is concerned of a movement to privatize the lakes and he supports public access. The inspection process includes requiring boats to pull plugs when exiting lake, stickers were given out in the past, but now just logs are kept. Green is not aware of literature being handed out. Hanus asked how much is being spent on inspections and what percentage of boats are from the 4 patrolled launches in Lake Minnetonka compared to other lakes. Gillispie asked if the grants are renewed annually. Discussion ensued and Green stated MCWD covers '/2 the cost and that grants have been renewed. -1431- Mound City Council Minutes — May 28, 2013 Salazar asked how you get a fine? Green said an officer can pull you over for having plug in or having any AIS visible on the boat being trailered. MOTION by Wegscheid, seconded by Salazar, to table Item 4C until further information can be obtained. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4D. Approve Vehicle Compliance Aqreement for Public Works Superintendent Rav Hanson Hanus explained history of policy and asked Hanson where he lives and what vehicle it is. The employee lives in Chanhassen and it is a Ford F150. Hanus pointed out agreement on Page 1349 last sentence. Hanus requested that sentence be clarified to tie de minimis use for only on the way to and from work. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the Vehicle Compliance Agreement subject to the correction in the Language as stated. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. Pamela Myers, President of the Westonka Historical Society Board, thanked Council and Staff for inviting them to reside at City Hall. An Open House has been set for 10 a.m. —2 p.m. for the public on June 15th and elected officials and families are invited to come at 9:00 a.m. Please RSVP to the City Manager. Activities may include Kare 11 and other news organizations. Kandis Hanson introduced a special guest Lindsey Crawford, who is interning this summer from Mankato State University. Lindy Crawford introduced herself and stated she is working with the Fire Department updating policy and procedures. Hanus welcomed Crawford to the City. 6. Planning Commission Recommendation: A. Public Hearing — Planning Case No. 13 -18 Review of Conditional Use Permit Amendment - Local Government Buildings in R -1 District 2415 Wilshire Boulevard (PID No. 24- 117 -24 -21 -0034) (City Hall and Public Safety Campus) Recommendation: Approval with Conditions Smith provided an overview of the CUP Amendment. Smith stated the most significant change is that the Wilshire Boulevard parking will be changed from 3 parallel spaces to 7 angled parking spaces and an addition of canopy on north side that will be considered a secondary enterance. The Planning Commission reviewed the application at the May meeting. The Planning Commission questioned whether parking could be changed on Maywood Road. Staff recommends that be undertaken with the 2016 street improvement project if needed. Planning Commission noted that no bike rack is provided at either building. Planning Commission did recommend approval. Smith stated she has received no comments from public. Hanus asked for any discussion /questions from Council. -1432- Mound City Council Minutes — May 28, 2013 Mayor Hanus opened the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. and upon receiving no comment, closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. Hanus said the packet comments on signage were vague and he wants signage to be very clear. He likes the secondary access and angled parking. Gesch asked if the CUP covers changes on the interior. Smith stated CUP covers use. Moore stated all interior work quotes have been received. Hanson stated portions of the glass will be removed and grills will be added. Gesch stated at Police Commission meeting that the Police Chief was surprised that the City would remove barriers and that other cities are looking at adding security. Hanson stated other mitigating security measures have been added, including panic buttons and that staff is concerned about customer service. Hanus asked about bike racks. Hanson said other areas need to be evaluated like Surfside Park. Wegscheid asked about security with the lower level access. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 13 -62: RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDITONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD PID NO. 24- 117 -24 -21 -0034 Hanson gave Gene Hostettler credit for working as the architect on the project for mostly in -kind and his determination to get good pricing. Moving date is set for October 23rd and both locations will be closed. October 24th City Hall will be open in the new space. Hanson stated the move is being done by City personnel. receiving the same. Steve McDonald referred to the Management Letter and the required disclosures. The opinion was unqualified and there were no findings with regard to internal controls. Two new GASBs were implemented that dealt with terminology and summary classification of amounts. McDonald referenced General Fund fund balance. He stated the General Fund revenue is comprised of 81 % tax receipts, which is not very diverse. Peer Group per Capita comparisons of expenditures showed Public Safety was higher, but the rest were under. Ratio analysis shows the debt service coverage is less than 100°/x, which means other sources than cash are being used. Peer Group consists of cities with populations between 2,500 and 10,000. Hanus asked about if there was data on age and improvements on the cities. New accounting standards in 2014 will require some additional work for reporting on pensions. McDonald thanked the Council. MOTION by Hanus , seconded by Salazar, to receive the Annual Audit Report for 2012. All voted in favor. Motion carried. -1433- Mound City Council Minutes — May 28, 2013 Faulkner stated 5 bids were received and the low bidder asked to have his bid and bond removed due to significant errors in the bid. Options include rejecting all bids and to rebid in hopes for a low bid. Staff does not recommend that as they do not anticipate a lower bid. Second option would be to award to the low bid. The third option, which staff recommends, is to approve the request to return the low bid and award to the second low bidder. Hanus asked what the low bid was compared to the second low bid. Hanus asked why engineering estimate was below all the bids. Hanus is wondering if we have to rebid. Faulkner said it was across the board and that BMI used tower unit prices and that it is hard to find comparable projects. Hanus asked for impact on budget and Pausche stated it will be incorporated in the next rate increase discussion, but does not have an impact on the 2013 operating budget. Salazar asked about the mathematical error on the low bid. Hanus stated it appears we do not want to do business with this company. Moore stated the City is not able to negotiate the bid once received. Gesch said why engineers estimate is off $11 OK which is 30 %. Faulkner stated if they have to invest more time, it will cost the City more money. Hanus stated is it reasonable to expect bids to be lower or higher. Faulkner stated often higher. This is a free market and where the bids came in. There were savings in the street project to help offset. Hanus asked if the project was too small to interest bidders. Faulkner pointed out they got 5 bidders. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Gesch, to adopt the following resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 63: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE BID SUBMITTED BY NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND RETURNING THE BID BOND AND AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO THE SECOND LOWEST BIDDER, MINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE 2013 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PW 13 -03), LS C1, 4922 THREE POINTS BOULEVARD 9. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, presenting discussion on City Code Amendment to Chanae Closina for On -Sale Liquor Establishments frnm 1 -nn a m to 2:00 a.m. Closing Time, as Petitioned by Owners of Willette Companies, Inc, d /b /a Carbone's Pizzeria Bar & Grill. Pausche stated the owners of Carbone's requested the Council reconsider the bar closing time and gave background on the current code language. The request is that the City follow state law and remove the additional restriction of 1 a.m. closing time to 2 a.m. subject to the owners obtaining an additional permit from the state. Discussion ensued and the Mayor gave background on conversations with the owners. Jeremy Willette, owner, asked if code language could allow for a%window after serving hours to allow customers to finish up. State statute does not address. MOTION by Gillispie, seconded by Gesch, to direct Staff to prepare a code amendment related to alcoholic beverages as discussed. All voted in favor. Motion carried. -1434- Mound City Council Minutes — May 28, 2013 10. Executive session for the purpose of the City Manager Performance Evaluation At 8:40 p.m. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council would go into closed session for the purpose of performing the City Manager's performance evaluation. The meeting reconvened at 9:28 p.m. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council had completed the performance evaluation of the City Manager. 11. Information /Miscellaneous Mayor Hanus stated he did not have much to add to the MCWD AIS report since there is not much the City can do about the MCWD being in charge. Hanus is comfortable with the language as is unless it changes to dictates, but does not see a need to provide comments. A. Comments /reports from Council Members /City Manager None were offered. B. Minutes: Docks & commons Commission — May 16, 2013 C. Reports: Finance Department —April 2013 Fire Committee Meeting Agenda — May 22, 2013 D. Correspondence: Letter — Resignation by Joyce C. Nelson — May 17, 2013 Letter — Minnehaha Creek Watershed District — May 22, 2013 11, Adjourn MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch to adjourn at 9:33 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk 1435- Mayor Mark Hanus C CITY OF MOUND CG 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT n o Z Cad 5. Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Organization U Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to . ure cleaning up of the park area e DD e PERMIT FEE: $300 /DAY TO $600IDAY* DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* ,-6' *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements.. Date(s) of Use Ac- S "(— 1 7 rY t Area to be Used Gn �----e C.1 C- Gr C-< -+- �T ✓ q h S f' CPa r P ` G Y-e 4 Time Frame �Q J� S J" y," Intended Use ki I,- G Expected Attendance Z Organization U \S� b Gr p5' cz Representative's Name G l� �c `S i c C, Address 3 G c./ b Telephone No, Home: S T Z 0[ - �� c( Work: Drivers License Number li// Q 7 3 z 5 ZZO '7 q5- -1436- CITY OF MOUND - 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 _tiP '9:1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: June 5, 2013 RE: Public Lands Permit — Installation of shore power from the house over public property to dock Summary. Zachary Augustyn, owner of the property at 2648 Shannon Lane, is requesting approval of a Public Lands Permit to install underground electric from the house located at 2648 Shannon Lane over public property to the dock which is part of the City dock program. Request for Public Lands Permit. Sec. 62 -11 of the City Code regulates use of public lands in the City of Mound and states that construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park, or commons, is unlawful unless a special construction on public land permit is issued. Staff /Consultant /Public Agency Review. Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments /consultants /agencies for review and comment. Comments are summarized below: Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson — Works needs to be done by a state certified electrician and meet state code requirements for buried electrical lines. Building Official Scott Qualle— Electrical permit required. City Manager Kandis Hanson. Does not see any problems. Staff to contact City Manager if there are comments of concern that need to be considered. Information /Discussion. 1. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control are in effect; also others including but not limited to, stormwater and shoreline alteration. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as rules regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant will be responsible for contacting the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permit(s) that may be needed to undertake the project. As applicable, any future permit (or related permit) will -1437- 1 be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance, as applicable, and or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. 2. A scaled site plan showing the proposed location of the underground electrical line shall be submitted as part of the required electrical permit application Applicant is advised that any private improvement is open to removal if the City needs access to the public property or has the need for construction on the land. In the event of disruption, only grass / cover material is replaced. The City also would not be liable or responsible for any proposed replacement. 4. The Public Lands Permit application was not forwarded to the Docks and Commons Advisory Commission (DCAC) for review and recommendation as they are not meeting in June. Ms. Pausche did contact the DCAC Chair who indicated it was acceptable to forward the application to the Council without DCAC review. In the event the Council requests review prior to action, it may remand the application to the DCAC for review at its next available meeting. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions. Please see attached draft resolution -1438- 2 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FROM ZACH AUGUSTYN FOR 2648 SHANNON LANE PID NO. 19- 117 -23 -23 -0052 WHEREAS, the applicant, Zach Augustyn, is requesting a Public Lands Permit to install underground electric from the house located at 2648 Shannon Lane to the dock located on public property which is part of the City dock program; and WHEREAS, Section 62 -11, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and WHEREAS, details regarding the request are contained in the Public Lands Permit Report dated June 5, 2013; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the Public Lands Permit application subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of Tuesday, June 11, 2013; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the Public Lands Permit as requested with the following conditions: 1. If deemed necessary by the City or its insurance carrier, a certificate of insurance, naming the City of Mound as an additional insured, to include all required coverage requirements in accordance with the City's policies shall be provided by the applicant prior to undertaking any work on the parcel. 2. If deemed necessary by the City Attorney, a waiver of liability and hold harmless agreement including the City's right to remove the electrical line, be prepared and executed by the applicant prior to the issuance of the required electrical permit. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for contacting the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the DNR and /or other affected public agencies prior to the commencement of any site activities and /or construction to confirm if additional permitting or approvals are required. 4. An electrical permit is required. 5. A scaled site plan showing the proposed location of the underground electrical line shall be submitted as part of the required electrical permit application. 6. Any additional conditions from the City Council, Staff and Consultants. -1439- Adopted by the City Council this 11 th day of June, 2013. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche -1440- Parks and Open Space Commission Date City Council Date IST Icial Parks Director MCWD Public Works Other CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT - new construction. NOTE: NO ISSUED PERMIT SHALL BE OTHER BUILDINGSON PUBLIC LANDCONSTRUCTION ity Code Section 62 -11 R ( ) & (b). [] PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT -to allow repairs to an existingstructure - City Code Section 62- 11(c). CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition - City Code Section 62- 11(g). LAND ALTERATION change In shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc. - City Code Section 62- 11(d). The ructure a work you are requesting is an activity on Publicly owned lands. Strictures like-boat houses, police. sh , etc, are all NONCONFORMING USES. It Is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance, which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are granted for a limited time and are non - transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, a a new permit is applied for due to a change In dock site holder. APPLICANT I Name Email F1 Address �� r it f dyp7i9nnan Phone (H) ZS�- 3y(- y vv) /P ABUTTING I Act PROPERTY Lot LEGAL DESC. Subdivision PID # _ Public Lands Permit APPllCallon Page i of Revised 1/30/2013 -1441- G � lJlluiro'( Block R1 RIA R2 R3 Bt 02 B3 (Circle one) PUBLIC Name Email PROPERTY Dock Site # Shoreline Type CONTRACTOR I Name Phone(H) vi ' A FEE OF $200.00 APPLIES IF VALUATION OF PROJECT EXCEEDS $1,000.00 AND NO PUBLIC BENEFIT IS DERIVED. PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) $ DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE Sh r2 -- nr „ /n A2 cs ac`f AppiicanirsSignature Dates' Public lands Permit APPOCaticn -442' Pape 2 of 2 Revised 113012013 > - Built Foundation N 99.35 7• E rvao rwa Is Immm ar NNl(IVFRm ure -- 160.22 -- ol 73.29' 916.8 58.0 u'2 ✓ N m ! � f NNG FOUNDATION-'-- - Y JULY 25. 2008 m m � I Nw 0 0 14.4 I .Y W.2 ]821 y I I / -- 160.00 -- N 89'35'17" E t 0 I ! �-IJNE OF $I NT 41LN6 !!!! .t ME ELEVATIONS AS PROPOSED: Top of Foundation 947.2 Top of Lowest Floor 9382 Top of Garage Floor 946.7 -1443- ' W � O O n op rp p Ip r. N Nm w� Gi N mn CY, C I U _. Otte. N0. 080785 Executive Summary TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASES: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: BACKGROUND Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant June 5, 2013 13-15,13-16, and 13 -17 Expansion Permit Applications Kathleen Kolbeck and Gary Vogel 4309 and 4313 Wilshire Boulevard PID NO. 19-117-23-13-0012 & 19- 117 -23 -13 -0011 R -1A Single Family Residential Low Density Residential The applicants, Kathleen Kolbeck and Gary Vogel, have requested a boundary adjustment to modify the size of their lots. Mr. Vogel owns the 4309 Wilshire property while Ms. Kolbeck has ownership in both properties. Boundary adjustments are eligible for administrative approval as provided by Sec. 121 -3 of the City Code. The applicants have also requested an expansion permit for both properties to allow for additions. The 4309 property is proposed to have a lakeside addition to accommodate a master bedroom and bathroom. The 4313 property is proposed to have a garage addition to accommodate a third stall and a building addition to include a connected workshop and utility room. Both lots have nonconforming lakehore setbacks. Details regarding the boundary adjustment and expansion permit applications are contained in the attached Planning Report. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING REVIEW The boundary adjustment and expansion permit applications were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 4, 2013 meeting. In general, the Planning Commission was favorable to the submitted expansion permit applications. Discussion took place about the 40 percent hardcover allowance for the reconfigured lots. Presently, both lots are over the maximum allowed for a lot of record. As a result of the boundary adjustment, 570 SF of hardcover is being removed from the 4309 parcel. However, additional hardcover needs to be removed from the 4313 parcel to meet the 40 percent hardcover and was included as a condition of approval. Possible areas where hardcover can be reduced includes imperious pavers removal in the area of the driveway and front of the house and replacement with a pervious product. The applicant also inquired whether the inc'i444 -)f a rain garden, which is being contemplated, could be considered as alternative to the 40 percent allowance. Staff mentioned that the tool for such an evaluation would be a variance and would need to be done separately as it is not requested as part of the current applications. Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval of the requested expansion permit applications for 4309 and 4313 Wilshire Boulevard subject to conditions. Resolutions for approval of the expansion permit applications have been prepared for consideration by the City Council. -1445- MINUTE EXCERPT JUNE 4, 2013 Chair called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, George Linkert, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert. Absent: Cindy Penner and David Goode. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Norlander. Others present: Kathleen Kolbeck and Gary Vogel, BOARD OF APPEALS A. PLANNING CASE NO. 13-15,13-17 and 13 -16' BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT AND EXPANSION 4309 AND 4313 WILSHIRE APPLICANTS: KATHLEEN I Sarah gave an overview of the prepared planni boundary adjustment to modify the size of the an expansion permit for both properties to:alic a garage and a workshop /utility addition for 43 ning Commission Secretary Jill )plicants have requested a ,'they have also requested on the lakeside at 4309 and Retterath asked about the City policies on pavers. Smith indicated that there were two products approved by staff. They both provide 85% reduction and require inspections certifying as -built installation. Linkert asked about the minimum construction elevation. Smith said the new construction will meet the required 933 elevation. Gary Vogel (applicant) asked the commission if a rain garden straddling the property line between houses would work in lieu of the paver option. Smith indicated that such a swap was not a likely option in connection with the expansion permits under consideration. Linkert commented that he liked the idea of a rain garden but was concerned that a new property owner would not like it. Gawtry said it would likely be assured through a conservation easement. Retterath appreciated the idea of keeping the pavers as is since they are in good shape. -1446- MOTION by Bergquist, second by Wiechert, to approve the expansion permit for 4309 Wilshire Boulevard with conditions 1 through 13. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Linkert, second by Bergquist, to recommend approval of the expansion permit for 4313 Wilshire Boulevard with conditions 1 through 13 and findings of fact 1 through 6. Retterath commented that the proposal seems a little bigger than it could be but that he's still in favor of it. MOTION carried unanimously. -1447- RESOLUTION # 13- RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 4309 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD PID #19- 117 -23 -13 -0012 WHEREAS, the applicants, Katherine Kolbeck and Gary Vogel, submitted an expansion permit for a house remodel /addition project at 4309 Wilshire Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning district and the shoreland overlay district; and WHEREAS, the shoreland overlay district requires a 50 foot structure setback from the Lake Minnetonka ordinary high water level (OHWL) of 929.4 feet; and WHEREAS, the existing home on the property is nonconforming as it is located only 21.2 feet from the ordinary high water level; and WHEREAS, the applicants seek to construct a one -story addition to fill in the lakeside corner of the house; and WHEREAS, the proposed addition will have a lakeshore setback of 27.2 feet from the ordinary high water level, thus it will be located no closer than the existing nonconforming setback of the home; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Section 129 -2, "Expansion Permit' is defined as follows: Expansion Permit means a permit which is granted by the City Council for the expansion or enlargement of a nonconforming structure in accordance with Section 129 -40. ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting expansion permits which are provided below: (a) Criteria. An expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the reasonable use of the land. in determining whether practical difficulties exist, the applicant must satisfy the City Council that the following criteria exist: sum (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. and; WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated May 29, 2013 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicants; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the expansion permit was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 4, 2013 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the expansion permit, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the expansion permit request at its June 11, 2013 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the expansion permit with the following conditions: 1. The boundary adjustment is approved. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Approval of grading and drainage plans by the City Engineer -1449- 6. Building height of the proposed structures shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 7. impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. 8. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback or public right -of- way. 9. The finished floor elevation of the addition shall be constructed at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation of 933.0 feet. 10. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 12. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 13. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. 2. The proposed expansion of the home is a reasonable use of the property. 3. The expansion permit is requested due to existing site characteristics that were not created by the applicant, including but not limited to the size and shape of the lot. 4. The expansion of the residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. -1450- 5. A significant portion of the property is located within the 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water level (OHWL). The home has an existing nonconforming setback of 21.2 feet. There are limited alternative areas on the site where the property owner can construct an addition. 6. The expansion requested does not extend beyond the lakeside setbacks of the existing home. The expansion permit is hereby approved for the following legally described property: See Exhibit A Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of June 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -1451- RESOLUTION # 13- RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 4313 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD PID #19- 117 -23 -13 -0011 WHEREAS, the applicant, Katherine Kolbeck, submitted an expansion permit for a house and garage remodel /addition project at 4313 Wilshire Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning district and the shoreland overlay district; and WHEREAS, the shoreland overlay district requires a 50 foot structure setback from the Lake Minnetonka ordinary high water level (OHWL) of 929.4 feet; and WHEREAS, the existing home on the property is nonconforming as it is located only 22.4 feet from the ordinary high water level; and WHEREAS, the applicants seek to construct a one -story addition to the home to include a utility room and a workshop, as well as a garage expansion to include an additional stall; and WHEREAS, the proposed additions will have a Iakeshore setback of 34.5 feet from the ordinary high water level, thus it will be located no closer than the existing nonconforming setback of the home; and WHEREAS, the home has an existing utility room that has a nonconforming low floor elevation of 929.06 feet; and WHEREAS, part of the home addition will include utility room that will have a conforming low floor elevation of 933.16 feet; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Section 129 -2, "Expansion Permit" is defined as follows: Expansion Permit means a permit which is granted by the City Council for the expansion or enlargement of a nonconforming structure in accordance with Section 129 -40. EM WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting expansion permits which are provided below: -1452- (a) Criteria. An expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the reasonable use of the land. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the applicant must satisfy the City Council that the following criteria exist: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off- street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. and; WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated May 29, 2013 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicants; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the expansion permit was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 4, 2013 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the expansion permit, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the expansion permit request at its June 11, 2013 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the expansion permit with the following conditions: 1. The boundary adjustment is approved. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -1453- 3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Approval of grading and drainage plans by the City Engineer. 6. Building height of the proposed structures shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 7. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. 8. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT Lakeshore setback or public right -of- way 9. The finished floor elevation of both additions shall be constructed at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation of 933.0 feet. 10. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 12. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 13. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodpiain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In particular, site alteration activities including not limited to, filling at or below the 931.5 elevation (MCWD 100 -year floodpiain) requires permitting and compensation. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. 2. The proposed expansion of the home is a reasonable use of the property. -1454- 3. The expansion permit is requested due to existing site characteristics that were not created by the applicant, including but not limited to the size and shape of the lot. 4. The expansion of the residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. 5. A significant portion of the property is located within the 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water level (OHWL). The home has an existing nonconforming setback of 22.4 feet. There are limited alternative areas on the site where the property owner can construct an addition. 6. The expansion requested does not extend beyond the lakeside setbacks of the existing home. The expansion permit is hereby approved for the following legally described property: See Exhibit A Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of June 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -1455- i.. • a �'.. K �. TO: FROM: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: May 29, 2013 PLANNING CASES: 13 -15, 13 -16, and 13 -17 SUBJECT: Boundary Adjustment and Expansion Permit APPLICANT: Kathleen Kolbeck and Gary Vogel LOCATION: 4309 and 4313 Wilshire Boulevard PID NO. 19-117-23-13-0012 & 19- 117 -23 -13 -0011 ZONING: R -1A Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential 1- XII7011,19111N�] The applicants, Kathleen Kolbeck and Gary Vogel, have requested a boundary adjustment to modify the size of their lots. Mr. Vogel owns the 4309 Wilshire property while Ms. Kolbeck has ownership in both properties. The applicants have also requested an expansion permit for both properties to allow for additions. The 4309 property is proposed to have a lakeside addition to accommodate a master bedroom and bathroom. The 4313 property is proposed to have a garage addition to accommodate a third stall and a building addition to include a connected workshop and utility room. SITE INFORMATION The two properties are located on the east side of Wilshire Boulevard adjacent to the bridge to Spring Park. According to the included Certificate of Survey, the 4309 property is currently 9,446 square feet in size and the 4313 property is 8,228 square feet in size. Hennepin County records indicate that the home on 4313 was built in 1936, while the home on 4309 was built in 1969. As shown on the survey, these properties are both located on Lake Minnetonka and are significantly impacted by the 50 foot shoreline setback area. Both homes are constructed within the 50 foot setback areas. 60 -DAY & 120 -DAY PROCESS The boundary adjustment and expansion permit applications were submitted on April 29, 2013. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the expansion permit land use requests unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule. It was determined to be April 30, 2013. Therefore, the City's deadline for action on the expansion permit applications is on or before June 28,_" ^4 1456- Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.358, the City of Mound has one hundred twenty (120) days to approve or deny the boundary adjustment request unless the applicant has agreed to an extension for review. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 120 -day rule. It was determined to be April 30, 2013. Therefore, the City's deadline for action on the expansion permit application is on or before August 26, 2013. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT The applicants are requesting a boundary adjustment that would move the existing lot line between the two structures generally northeast, or closer to the home at 4309. Rather than being straight, there will be a slight kink in the lot lines near the street -side corners of both structures. This kink is partly the result of the slightly different alignment to the street of the two homes on their properties. Review Criteria The adjustment of lot lines is governed by the regulations contained in City Code Section 121 Subdivision Regulations. Section 121 -33 specifically addresses minor boundary adjustments as follows: "The relocation of a boundary line between two abutting, existing parcels of property; such relocation not causing the creation of a new parcel or parcels and such relocation not violating the zoning ordinance set out in Chapter 129 may be administratively approved by the city and shall be submitted in a form so as to allow for recording at the county. At the discretion of the city, a survey may be required. Should the city determine that the relocation of a property boundary may have an adverse effect on either property or may circumvent applicable zoning requirements, the city may require the boundary adjustment to be processed as a subdivision exemption with Council approval as provided for in subsection (3) or as a minor subdivision in accordance with the process as set forth in Sec. 121 -61. Approval of a minor boundary adjustment shall not disqualify the involved parcels from "lot of record" status." Discussion The applicants are proposing to move the boundary line closer to the home on 4309. This will result in a transfer of approximately 863 square feet from the 4309 property to the 4313 property. Both properties will remain significantly larger than the minimum 6,000 square feet required in the R -1A zoning district and have lot widths greater than 40 feet. According to the survey, all sideyard setbacks related to the line being adjusted will remain sufficient in size. As a result of the boundary line adjustment, the amount of hardcover on each property will be modified. While not specifically identified, it is Staff's understanding based on the materials submitted that an examination of the boundary adjustment shows that the percent hardcover on the 4309 property will increase from 40.4% to 44.5% solely based on the lot line moving. At the same time, the percent hardcover on the 4313 property will decrease from 43.4% to 39.2 %. The applicant has indicated that 570 square feet of the hardcover on the 4309 property will be removed as part of the future projects. This will drop the hardcover percentage for the 4309 property to 40.0 %. -1457- As noted in the City Code citation above, the boundary line adjustment can be done administratively if it is determined that the proposed adjustment does not violate the Zoning Code. It is Staff determination that existing conditions, such as the reduced setback to the ordinary high water level, that do not change as a result of the boundary line adjustment are acceptable. However, any conditions that change as a result of the boundary line adjustment need to be in conformance of the Zoning Code. This includes both the sideyard setbacks and the percent hardcover for the sites. Staff is planning to approve this administratively as long as the applicants agree to eliminate the 570 square feet of hardcover on the site to bring the 4309 property into conformance with the 40% hardcover maximum. Staff is not requesting a motion from the Planning Commission at this time. See also "4313 Expansion Permit Application" section on Page 4 of the Planning Report for information regarding existing /proposed hardcover. 4309 Expansion Permit Application The applicant has requested the ability to add a 186 square foot addition onto the southeast corner of the house. The 11.9 by 15.6 foot, one -story addition will fill in the corner of the house and contain a master bedroom and bath. The request is an expansion permit as the existing home is already nonconforming as it is constructed within the 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water line. This addition will extend no further than the existing building line located 21.2 feet from the ordinary high water level. Review Criteria City Code Section 129 -40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued when the City Code imposes practical difficulties for the property owner in the reasonable use of a property. The following are the criteria that should be satisfied: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. -1458- PROPOSED DIMENSIONS* *dimensions after boundary adjustment complete Expansion Permit 28.8 feet DISCUSSION This property is a one- story, slab on grade home that has a foundation 1,760 square feet in size including a two -car garage. Based on information reviewed as part of a 2011 variance for a house reconstruction project on the 4309 property that was not undertaken, the home has an existing crawl space of 930.0 which was constructed prior to current codes. The required low floor elevation for new structures is 933.0. The applicants are proposing to add a small addition and complete some internal remodeling to add a master bedroom and bath to the property. The addition will follow the same plane as the existing foundation so as to not be located closer to the lakeshore. The closest point of the new addition to the lakeshore will be 23.8 feet. Even with the new addition, the property will remain under the 40% hardcover maximum for an existing lot of record. Hardcover Analvsis Required Proposed (Existing) Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 8,581.9 sq. ft. Side Yard (south) 6 feet 6 feet Lakeshore 50 feet 21.2 feet Hardcover 40.4% 40.0% *dimensions after boundary adjustment complete Expansion Permit 28.8 feet DISCUSSION This property is a one- story, slab on grade home that has a foundation 1,760 square feet in size including a two -car garage. Based on information reviewed as part of a 2011 variance for a house reconstruction project on the 4309 property that was not undertaken, the home has an existing crawl space of 930.0 which was constructed prior to current codes. The required low floor elevation for new structures is 933.0. The applicants are proposing to add a small addition and complete some internal remodeling to add a master bedroom and bath to the property. The addition will follow the same plane as the existing foundation so as to not be located closer to the lakeshore. The closest point of the new addition to the lakeshore will be 23.8 feet. Even with the new addition, the property will remain under the 40% hardcover maximum for an existing lot of record. Hardcover Analvsis 'Includes removal of 570 square feet of bituminous area 4313 Expansion Permit Application The applicants have requested the ability to add a third stall to their existing garage and a proposed building addition to house a workshop and utility room. All of the expansions will occur between the two properties and are made possible by the boundary adjustment. The request is an expansion permit as the existing home is already nonconforming as it is constructed only 22.4 feet from the ordinary high water level. The proposed workshop and utility room addition are proposed to be located 34.5 feet from the ordinary high water level at its closest point. The additions will meet all other setback requirements. -1459- 4309 Wilshire Existing Boundary Adjustment* _ Expansion Permit Lot Size (sq feet) 9,446.0 8,581.9 8,581.9 Hardcover (sq feet) 3,817.0 3,247.0 3,435.8 Percentage 1 40.4% 37.8% 40.0% 'Includes removal of 570 square feet of bituminous area 4313 Expansion Permit Application The applicants have requested the ability to add a third stall to their existing garage and a proposed building addition to house a workshop and utility room. All of the expansions will occur between the two properties and are made possible by the boundary adjustment. The request is an expansion permit as the existing home is already nonconforming as it is constructed only 22.4 feet from the ordinary high water level. The proposed workshop and utility room addition are proposed to be located 34.5 feet from the ordinary high water level at its closest point. The additions will meet all other setback requirements. -1459- Review Criteria City Code Section 129 -40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued when the City Code imposes practical difficulties for the property owner in the reasonable use of a property. The following are the criteria that should be satisfied for the (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. PROPOSED DIMENSIONS* *dimensions after boundary adjustment complete DISCUSSION This property is a two -story home with a two -car garage. The home has a crawl space where the utility room is located that has an elevation of 929.06 feet. This is under the required 933 lowest floor elevation. Part of the proposed addition will include a utility room that will have a low floor elevation of 933.16 feet, thus meeting the City requirements. The workshop /utility room addition will be constructed within the 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water level. As shown on the enclosed survey, the new addition will be located 34.5 feet at its closest point. While within the setback area, it is significantly less than the existing 22.4 foot setback on the existing home. -1460- Required Proposed /Existing Variance Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 9,091 sq. ft. - Front Yard 20 feet 23.1 feet - Side Yard (north) 6 feet 6 feet - Lakeshore 50 feet 22.4 feet (existing) 27.6 feet Hardcover 40% 43.4% (existing) - 43.1% (proposed) *dimensions after boundary adjustment complete DISCUSSION This property is a two -story home with a two -car garage. The home has a crawl space where the utility room is located that has an elevation of 929.06 feet. This is under the required 933 lowest floor elevation. Part of the proposed addition will include a utility room that will have a low floor elevation of 933.16 feet, thus meeting the City requirements. The workshop /utility room addition will be constructed within the 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water level. As shown on the enclosed survey, the new addition will be located 34.5 feet at its closest point. While within the setback area, it is significantly less than the existing 22.4 foot setback on the existing home. -1460- The one area of concern for Staff is that the hardcover percentage proposed as a result of the expansion permit will be 43.1 %. As noted previously, the existing hardcover percentage of 43.4% was proposed to be reduced to 39.2% as a result of the boundary adjustment. It is Staff's recommendation that the hardcover percentage for the site should remain at or below 40 %, particularly since construction is already taking place within the 50 foot shoreline setback area. There are areas of impervious surfaces, particularly in the front of the property, which could be modified so as to reduce the site's overall hardcover percentage. Bringing the hardcover within the 40 percent on the 4313 property was discussed with the applicant. Hardcover Analysis The applicant has subsequently indicated that there will be some modifications to the grading and drainage between the properties. There is approximately a one foot difference between the grades of the two properties, with the 4309 property being slightly higher. With the movement of the property lines and the proposed additions, the applicants are in the process of determining how best to handle drainage on the site into the future. Under consideration are a swale, raingarden, or underground drainage line. The City Engineer has been informed of these plans and requested as a condition of approval that all grading and drainage plans be approved by the City prior to construction. CITY /CONSULTANT /AG ENCYREVI E W Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Scott Qualle, Building Official Some fire resistive construction may be required, but that will be reviewed at the time permits are requested. Greg Pederson, Fire Chief There are no fire code issues. Dan Faulkner, City Engineer Existing drainage patterns should not be altered without the approval of the City Engineer. .M 4313 Wilshire Existing Boundary Adjustment Expansion Permit Lot Size (sq feet) 8,227.6 9,091.0 9,091.0 Hardcover (sq feet) 3,567.7 3,567.7 3,918.1 Percentage 43.4% 39.2% 43.1% The applicant has subsequently indicated that there will be some modifications to the grading and drainage between the properties. There is approximately a one foot difference between the grades of the two properties, with the 4309 property being slightly higher. With the movement of the property lines and the proposed additions, the applicants are in the process of determining how best to handle drainage on the site into the future. Under consideration are a swale, raingarden, or underground drainage line. The City Engineer has been informed of these plans and requested as a condition of approval that all grading and drainage plans be approved by the City prior to construction. CITY /CONSULTANT /AG ENCYREVI E W Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Scott Qualle, Building Official Some fire resistive construction may be required, but that will be reviewed at the time permits are requested. Greg Pederson, Fire Chief There are no fire code issues. Dan Faulkner, City Engineer Existing drainage patterns should not be altered without the approval of the City Engineer. .M Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director At its April 27, 2010 meeting, the City Council adopted the following resolutions: Resolution No. 10 -12 approving a variance for the property at 4309 Wilshire Boulevard for a house reconstruction project for former owner. These approvals included a 22.5 foot lakeshore to the OHWM on the east side and a 22.3 foot lakeshore setback to the OHWM on the north side to allow replacement of the existing house. Resolution No. 10 -23 denying a variance for the property at 4309 Wilshire Boulevard for eaves encroachment. Sec. 129 -197 of the City Code includes the complete list of items that are allowed encroachments in yard areas. Some of the applicable encroachments are provided below: - Bay windows are allowed encroachments provided the encroachment within the yard does not exceed 8 square feet and provided the setback of the principal wall conforms to district regulations. -Eaves are allowed to encroach 2 feet into setback areas -Steps are allowed to encroach as long as they are located from 2 feet from lot lines. -The list of items referenced in Sec. 129 -2 (definitions) which do not qualify as a structure shall be considered to be allowable encroachments unless another section of the code requires a setback. -1462- STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 4309 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD — EXPANSION PERMIT Staff recommends approval of this expansion permit as the proposed use is reasonable. The proposed addition will not extend closer to the Lakeshore than the current home and the project will otherwise meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission carefully review the criteria for the granting of an expansion permit. Criteria Comment (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the The proposed addition will continue to be property considering: residential in character. The property has sufficient a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. off - street parking. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances The property is significantly impacted by the 50 justifying the expansion are unique to the property feet setback to the ordinary high water line. There and result from lot size or shape, topography, or is limited buildable area on the lot for an other circumstances over which the owners of the expansion. property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do The nonconformity is an existing condition that was not result from the actions of the applicant. not created by the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter The expansion of a single - family home will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. This expansion is the minimum the applicant feels is needed for their use of the home. It will be up to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether they are in agreement with that assessment. In recommending approval for the expansion permit, Staff recommends that the following conditions be included: 1. The boundary adjustment is approved. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Approval of grading and drainage plans by the City Engineer. -1463- 6. Building height of the proposed structures shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 7. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. 8. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback or public right -of -way 9. The finished floor elevation of the addition shall be constructed at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation of 933.0 feet. 10. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 12. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 13. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. The proposed expansion of the home is a reasonable use of the property. 3. The expansion permit is requested due to existing site characteristics that were not created by the applicant, including but not limited to the size and shape of the lot. 4. The expansion of the residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. . lt , A significant portion of the property is located within the 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water level (OHWL). The home has an existing nonconforming setback of 21.2 feet. There are limited alternative areas on the site where the property owner can construct an addition. 6. The expansion requested does not extend beyond the lakeside setbacks of the existing home. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 4313 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD— EXPANSION PERMIT Staff recommends approval of this expansion permit as the proposed use is reasonable. The proposed addition will not extend closer to the Lakeshore than the current home and the project will otherwise meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements as long as the hardcover percentage remains at or below 40 %. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission carefully review the criteria for the granting of an expansion permit. Criteria Comment (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the The proposed addition will continue to be property considering: residential in character. The property has sufficient a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. off - street parking. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust, c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances The property is significantly impacted by the 50 justifying the expansion are unique to the property foot setback to the ordinary high . water line. There and result from lot size or shape, topography, or is limited buildable area on the lot for an other circumstances over which the owners of the expansion, property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do The nonconformity is an existing condition that was not result from the actions of the applicant. not created by the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter The expansion of a single - family home will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. This expansion is the minimum the applicant feels is needed for their use of the home. Given the size of the lot, it will be up to the Planning Commission and City Council to determine whether they are in agreement with that assessment. In recommending approval for the expansion permit, Staff recommends that the following conditions be included: 1. The boundary adjustment is approved. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -1465- 3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Approval of grading and drainage plans by the City Engineer. 6. Building height of the proposed structures shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 7. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. B. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT Lakeshore setback or public right -of -way 9. The finished floor elevation of both additions shall be constructed at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation of 933.0 feet. 10. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 12. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 13. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In particular, site alteration activities including not limited to, filling at or below the 931.5 elevation (MCWD 100 -year floodplain) requires permitting and compensation. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. 2. The proposed expansion of the home is a reasonable use of the property. -1466- 3. The expansion permit is requested due to existing site characteristics that were not created by the applicant, including but not limited to the size and shape of the lot. 4. The expansion of the residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. 5. A significant portion of the property is located within the 50 foot setback to the ordinary high water level (OHWL). The home has an existing nonconforming setback of 22.4 feet. There are limited alternative areas on the site where the property owner can construct an addition. 6. The expansion requested does not extend beyond the lakeside setbacks of the existing home. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Pending recommendation from the Planning Commission, the proposed applications will be forwarded to an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible meeting dates are Tuesday, June 25, 2013 or Tuesday, July 9, 2013. -1467- $100 Application Fee and $750 escrow re uired at time of application PROPERTY Subject Address 436'11 c 431-5 3l-5 wk1shl -'e BAV( ! INFO EXISTING Lots 4-ACk u () Block Subdivision LEGAL DESCRIPTION PID# �Ui "—� Plat # �'�1�-' PROPOSED ►d_� �t A. Lot(s) Block LEGAL B. Lots) sV iV @ DESCRIPTION Block Zoning District Circle: R -1 R-tA R -2 R -3 B -1 B -2 B -3 PROPERTY Are there existing structures on the property? �y�es / no Do the existing structures comply with the zoning ordinance for setbacks, hardc ver, etc.? ye� n jr U APPLICANT The applicant is: owner x other_ Email 'W ox�® ry ii,`• CbVVj Name k-" y% 4 t t9dxf \ 1V00\4 E �t Address 4�t'i wl l�JV6�'�� t31va t a`Ol3V� y Phone Work:` J�3 41�.j CYo(2c{(s °Il'((rs t,Cell E -mail Address t°� (� ® ►met. CUM Fax • A. OWNER Name Yai C Email (if other than applicant) Address Phone Home Work Fax SURVEYOR/ t [� Name DiLyiCi iii , Uoa{ - Email <ieC.� LyeC,rd (J(_At* ENGINEER ii -GoQ 'e uav 10 1, �. Address sc' W h C.> Office Phone `^ -a-7-0q-si Fax Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. OvilI /Applicant Signature Minor Boundary Adjustment Information (1130/2013) Page 4 of 4 Total Hardcover 3,4]98 rot Area 8,58 7 9 x or H.meaverm 40 z 3 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: /7 1 'l EXISTING HARDCOVER t o ' (4313 Parcel) SaViMY051BM career of Lott A a Haase & Gomge 1,880 9 ss Ets' E Ga"In 132.7 Pomr ia0 Smroces 1501 paW P-, SLrbm 3573(159) 54 T.t.l HaMcank 35673 Lc; Area 8,217,6 9429..6 dc or Hcrdcover- 43.4 % 9]I na- =cayc w0.1 , l4 p (PROPOSED HARDCOVER) /4 (4313 Parcel) a p How & G o rage 2132.7 < 1i] y { POVer 5UIIacP9 12)) - Pmv seen, 39.J(m) 54 C =, ° Total Hardcover 3,916.1 Lot Are. 9,091 d ° 9. 01 Hardcover_ 43.1 X�, EXISTING HARDCOVER (D (4339 Parcel) ,pp ; ur\ H. l & Garage 1,060 I>nveay ay & P.wa sumema 2057 Total Horace- J,B17 tY / rat Area Read X or Hardwver- 404 $ 4 (PROPOSED HARDCOVER) x "� "' mi" AM I (4309 Parcel) House & Garage 1 946 Or,, k %nd' SLaom 1,488.8 °/-r� N /1NNNN9J.. \ U \ 1 Total Hardcover 3,4]98 rot Area 8,58 7 9 x or H.meaverm 40 z 3 ["^ Flnan'ef�mm /hnaro I O Denotes 1-11 .-a.. • Deratas louse m ..men, x 000.0 Noratee tin, eler. REVISED: 5/41/13 - mis[ nle-R dim...I REVISE¢ 6 1IS /I] - mhe P,epasnd d;- nq-asc Cnn - I k Ilk".., 1 1440. IIYM. RENSEO: 3/05/13 A OJ o.r �a :iee.x wR.aary Ina ..reran nu. qA 2 4S� EXCEPTION le X o ad °ear' 2. 2p13 Fo `r l s� SHEET i OF 2 SHEETS 'X ck /7 1 'l t o ' SaViMY051BM career of Lott A a V ["^ Flnan'ef�mm /hnaro I O Denotes 1-11 .-a.. • Deratas louse m ..men, x 000.0 Noratee tin, eler. REVISED: 5/41/13 - mis[ nle-R dim...I REVISE¢ 6 1IS /I] - mhe P,epasnd d;- nq-asc Cnn - I k Ilk".., 1 1440. IIYM. RENSEO: 3/05/13 A OJ o.r �a :iee.x wR.aary Ina ..reran nu. qA 2 4S� EXCEPTION le X o ad °ear' 2. 2p13 Fo `r l s� SHEET i OF 2 SHEETS 'X 'l t o ' S� ° °a4 vo 7 9429..6 9]I na- =cayc w0.1 , , E . i /4 A OJ o.r �a :iee.x wR.aary Ina ..reran nu. qA 2 4S� EXCEPTION le X o ad °ear' 2. 2p13 Fo `r l s� SHEET i OF 2 SHEETS 'X ad °ear' 2. 2p13 Fo `r l s� SHEET i OF 2 SHEETS 'X CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: KATHLEEN KOLBECK & GARY VOGEL EXISTING DESCRIPTION (4313 Parcel): That part of Lot h first Rearrangement of Phelps Island Park First Division, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin Counly, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot A; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot A, a distance of 60.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence southeasterly deflecting to the right 96 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds to the southeasterly line of said Lot A, and there said line terminates. PROPOSED DESCRIPTION (4313 Parcel): That part of Lot A, First Rearrangement of Phelps Island Park First Division, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies southwesterly of the following described line °X": Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot A; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot A, on an assumed bearing of North 20 degrees 29 minutes 20 seconds East, 62.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 71 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds East 26.50 feet; thence South 59 degrees 23 minutes 58 seconds East 8.16 feet; thence South 71 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds East 66.8 feet, more or less, to the Share line of Lake Minnetonka and said line Y there terminating. EXISTING DESCRIPTION (4309 Parcel): That part of Lot A lying Northeasterly of follow described line: Commencing at the Southwesterly comer of said Lot A, thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot A 60 feet to point of beginning of said described line, thence Southeasterly deflect right 96 degrees to the Southeasterly line of said Lot A and said line there terminating, EXCEPT that part lying Northeasterly of a line described as beginning at a point in said Northwesterly line of Lot A distant 180 feet Northerly of Southwesterly corner thereof, thence Southeasterly to a point in Easterly line of said Lot A distant 205 feet Northerly from Southeast comer thereof and there terminating, "The First Re— arrangement Of Phelps' Island Park -1st Div." PROPOSED DESCRIPTION (4309 Parcel): That part of the property described as follows which lies northeasterly of line °X": That part of Lot A lying Northeasterly of follow described line: Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of said Lot A, thence Northeasterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot A 60 feet to point of beginning of said described line, thence Southeasterly deflect right 96 degrees to the Southeasterly line of said Lot A and said line there terminating, EXCEPT that part lying Northeasterly of a line described as beginning at a point in said Northwesterly line of Lot A distant 180 feet Northerly of Southwesterly comer thereof, thence Southeasterly to a point in Easterly line of said Lot A distant 205 feet Northerly from Southeast corner thereof and there terminating, 'The First Re— arrangement Of Phelps' Island Park -1st Div.' said line "X° being described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Lot A; thence northeasterly along the northwesterly line of said Lot A, on an assumed bearing of North 20 degrees 29 minutes 20 seconds East, 62.00 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 71 degrees 41 minutes 46 seconds East 26.50 feet; thence South 59 degrees 23 minutes 58 seconds East 8,16 feet; thence South 71 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds East 66.6 feet, more or less, to the Shore line of Lake Minnetonka and said line "X" there terminating. R.F File - R \tP \ORNW \IP2IB.OWG SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS `�r,q�W, Y64W �v��ppM bs nb Ns I /�S m mamacu SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No. G F2 � SUBJECT Address Z'-J0`1 lij t k>K,fe. T31VC1 PROPERTY.�,,,,-j+, LEGAL Lot fie- 4- Luc -�L1� �Fe4 Block DESC. 1 Subdivision t PID# �" Zoning: R R1 R2 "R3t B1 B2 83 (circle one) PROPERTY Name �% y® kQ.rM W)DIU- -Email _ � �c ( 4gKa� i Cot, OWNER �q t Address X313 �tkS� kfe. �WcL 1Y 8UVL� MW �3(0 tCALN 6*i1 Phone Hoaile(AZ -1" 046 Work (Btu- '373—�t`2� Fax }�• APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No Q(). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): VO ,, 1 y ,ti Own ✓ • Expansion Permit Information _1471_ (1/30/2013) Page 4 of 6 Case No. % l 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No ()Q. If no, specify each non - conformity: ��10� - <� 3�� : \t:)•t:Jlf�1J♦Lf'Sit•5.1f�IfJ wJgYa* �' vf!1 �: �" aIY. :JY�:ilit��iils+lil:�Ar��il1�'1 ( ) too narrow (} topography ( ) soil too small () drainage () existing situation ( ) too shallow] shape {}tlother: specify Please describe: 7ft ftfflt4a ice? - M2123 M. Expansion Permit Information -1472- (1/30/2013) Page 5 of 6 t,:—> L T SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION (or existing) 1 Front Yard: (N S ES) ft. Z401, ft. Side Yard: ((DS E W ) ft. 1,2 W` 4; ft. )JA ft. Side Yard: ( N Sa W ) 6 ft. �6 G' eA ' &ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: (N S&) ft. va, t,�r�,ft. (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: 4t�, ft. ` ft. f { b ft. Lot Size: sq ft sq ft �Z sq ft � � Hardcover: 11+®® sq ft -40 +Yo sq ft 40°o sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No ()Q. If no, specify each non - conformity: ��10� - <� 3�� : \t:)•t:Jlf�1J♦Lf'Sit•5.1f�IfJ wJgYa* �' vf!1 �: �" aIY. :JY�:ilit��iils+lil:�Ar��il1�'1 ( ) too narrow (} topography ( ) soil too small () drainage () existing situation ( ) too shallow] shape {}tlother: specify Please describe: 7ft ftfflt4a ice? - M2123 M. Expansion Permit Information -1472- (1/30/2013) Page 5 of 6 t,:—> L Case No. 0_1i 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1582)? Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain: :5 Sra 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circ instances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No If yes, explain: 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? '' � `" � • � � r rs �'i. � �, a _ � y; i'I .::yam 9. Comments: F +- RAI ' wa ;' ' • J s 1, ... `7: 10-9 ;74F I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that 1 have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's 2. . Expansion Permit Information -1473_ (1130/2013) Page 6 of 6 -1414- -1477 SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. or Address 4'303 a1Vd e— c'c k—c d Block Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No X). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): PID # -f{ I t '��` J�(� Zoning: Rt R1 R2 R3 Bt B2 63 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name Mae- V VV Email OWNER rt Address �{(�`lS�1F1�� `��c� (uyui�1 W Phone Home Gary Work N, A, APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No X). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Case No. I� t 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. fJd7`t : }tsl�(. pfis`t'A Lts`1� L-ow ARE µfkr-T :N -TM GU t36U�t�At�y ,hc�i(llii�tC�tT �►�t,.d�+-t'Z�l 5(93'a'�id� �rZ'7� �ak�` SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION 4 Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No IY), If no, specify each non- conformity: TfM `C d $4 �' a�D�?t C lOb,d 1`��1 It.�f� rti iE cbt L. tr A-Gk., ADPrtJ6K! bb+Cr— t6 34.5`, Xt�i11 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: EM (or existing) Front Yard: (N S EO) 2-0 ft. 25t_+ ISTC� f#.�' ft. Side Yard: ((@S E W } io ft. 17.28 WI&It. Side Yard: (Na W) & ft, a -S' 5XKit(,ft, PA. ft, Rear Yard: ( N S(DN) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: (N Sow) ft, Z25, eXWTGft. 34-r2 ft. ( N S E IN ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. 62 ft, ros ft. Lot size: CMdf 1, (c ®DD sq ft ' Iq a sq ft qM sq ft � Hardcover: ((►t.l O sq ft �f ` p sq ft � '}3. 7o sq ft (41 4 Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No IY), If no, specify each non- conformity: TfM `C d $4 �' a�D�?t C lOb,d 1`��1 It.�f� rti iE cbt L. tr A-Gk., ADPrtJ6K! bb+Cr— t6 34.5`, Xt�i11 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: EM Case No.' f 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No ( ). If yes, explain: 5 Ac--1r- WAS) Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No K. If yes, explain: 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No �<). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 0 .. WE 41W L57 ... a 1 =_"O 91`1 ♦, ..� . � � +mss _�,, ��.� 'ate °..j, � _�.� J1 bw I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. t acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Expansion Permit Information -1480- (1/30/2013) Page 6 of 6 Date 2 Date E PIE Qzi yF {�['A, {r��}�T {��T TQ O / \ YXNOLa1NiVI 1' -�mrvw ibAJ'N fiZ6U 'N H Z J.J626 .– f _/'nei3 qlM W CV � / d � Y�'' \wpm ,i ; �s g• °P a0'.no � 1�� U / °a, Mwq�azsae ggg Mll }—� � k 2 � k 2 d ¢ �• m \��fYr / 9 � � €g�s ��SSc �irii !•Ty o ��$a��7 �. �= '��°°d7 0 �° k � g9q °k � `fit ;- � °E #y E �S op a g$o Q � aZy ��eS 1fF0�� 4 "�i 2 -1481 0 3 Consulting Engineers & Surveyors j 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 - Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448.8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 _. r �. www,bolton- menk.com June 5, 2013 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2013 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation City Project No. PW -13 -06 Award of Bid Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: Bids were received on June 4, 2013 with the following results. Contractor Amount Bid Michels Corporation $196,663.00 Insituform Tech USA $218,920.00 Lametti and Sons, Inc. $224,700.00 Veit & Company, Inc. $242,700.00 This project has been approved by Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) as part of their Municipal Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Grant Program. The approved grant covers 25 percent of the construction cost up to the maximum approved grant amount of $74,301. This amount was determined from our initial grant submittal request for this project estimated to cost $303,720. Since the low bid is well below this amount, staff will identify additional sanitary sewer pipe that is in need of lining and add it to this project, subject to the approval of MCES. This will allow the City to take full advantage of the approved grant amount, The contractor, Michels Corporation, out of Brownsville, WI, has successfully completed several similar projects including the 2011/2012 Mound Pipe Lining project. At this time, the contractor has indicated this will be a Fall season construction project. At that time, all affected residents will receive notice of the impending work. It is our recommendation that the Council approve the attached resolution awarding the 2013 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project: to Michels Corporation in amount of $196,663.00. Sincerely, BOLTON &/ j/MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer WMOIKC1 2 1 0 5 67311_Crmcvll2 Docst2013.06 -05 Bid Award Recdn to Clornxeii.doc DESIGNING FOR A SE77ER TOMORROW Bolton & Munk is rin equal opportunity employer -1488- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13- RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2013 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT CITY PROJECT NO. PW -13 -06 WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has appropriated $4,000,000 for a grant program to be administered by the Metropolitan Council for the purpose of providing grants to municipalities for capital improvements to public municipal wastewater collection systems to reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system (1 /1 Municipal Grant Program); and WHEREAS, the Council has identified the City of Mound as a contributor of excessive inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system and thus an eligible applicant for grant funds under the 1/1 Municipal Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the City has submitted an acceptable grant application and the Metropolitan Council has determined that the City of Mound qualifies for a Maximum Grant Amount of $74,301 as stipulated in the Grant Agreement approved on March 5, 2013 and referenced as CONTRACT NO. SG2013 -020; and WHEREAS, bids were received on June 4, 2013 for the 2013 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project with the following results: Contractor Amount Rid Michels Corporation $196,663.00 Insituform Tech USA $218,920.00 Lametti and Sons, Inc. $224,700.00 Veit & Company, Inc. $242,700.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that contract for the Project is hereby awarded to Michels Corporation of Brownsville, WI, and that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Michels Corporation in the name of the City for the Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk in the amount of $196,663.00. Adopted by the City Council this 11"' day of June, 2013 ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk ;. Mark Hanus, Mayor ......�...� � � N �j[� {' Consulting Engineers & Surveyors `j 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 - Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 f Phone (952)448- 8838• Fax (952)448 -8805 ��"� www.bolton- menk.com June 6, 2613 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement Project City Project Nos. PW- 12 -01, 12- 03,12 -04 Pay Request No. 9 Dear Ms. Hanson: Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 9 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work completed on the 2012 Street, Utility, Lift Station and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from February 2, 2013 through May 25, 2013. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $22,26&.17 to GMH Asphalt Corporation, Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance -1490- DATE: 6/512013 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 9 2012 STREET IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NOS. PW- 12-01, 12 -03, 12 -04 BMI PROJECT NO. 012.103970 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 2/2/2013 THROUGH 5/25/2013 CONTRACTOR GMH Asphalt Corp. OWNER City of Mound ENGINEER Bolton & Menk TOTALAMOUNT BID ... .... .._ ... ....... ..... ........ ........ ____ .......... _.............. ___ ............. ......... ........ .... ........ $ APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS, ._..._ ..............._..........._,.,.................. ............................... CURRENTCONTRACT AMOUNT.. ....... ......................... ......,.....................,................ .;..............- .............- $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE.......... TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE .... ............................... ..... ............................... $ DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED ......... ....... ...... ___ ...... ........ ............. ....... $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS .......... ............................. ............................. ........... ____ $ RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 2.5% ) TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS... 3,542,611.68 3,542,611.68 3,800,985.47 3,800,985.47 ..... I — —........ $ 95,024.64 .......__ ................... ....................._..._.._.. $ NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE. ... _ .... .... _ ................ ____ ....... .......... ...... _ ...... ... ........ _ $ 3,705,960.83 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES .......... ... ....... ....................... .. ... ........................ .... ... .... ........... $ 3,683,694.66 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 9 ..... ._ ........................................ .............................._ ......... ........ ............. $ 22,266.17 Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been compiled with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: GMH Asphalt Corporation 9180 Lake Town Road Chaska, MN 55318 By Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 By D LG `tom- - l - 'a- 01'6u -'t-- PROJECT ENGINEER Daniel I. Faulkner Date & / 6 / 13 APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND By -1491- Date L_ N 8L NA E=- N / %I Consulting Engineers & Surveyors J 1j 2838 Shadow lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318.1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448-8805 �YVV iM. www.bolton- menk.com June 6, 2013 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project City Project Nos. PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 Pay Request No. 1 Dear Ms. Hanson: Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 1 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work completed on the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from May 13, 2013 through May 25, 2013. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $340,55234 to GMH Asphalt Corporation. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance -1492- DATE: 615f2013 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 1 CONTRACTOR GMH Asphalt Corp. 2013 STREET IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound City Project Nos. PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk SMI PROJECT NO. C12.105545 Date / / FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 5/13/2013 THROUGH 5/2512013 APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: TOTALAMOUNT BID......... ....... ..... ......... ........................... ...... ...... ........ ............. ..................... ................ ....... ....... $ 4274,544.41 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS +EXTRA WORK. ......... .. .... ...... ......... . ..... ............. — ... — $ 298,398.41 CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT ........ ................ ...........:.............................. ...... . ...... .. _;._. .. ...... ....... $ 4.572.942.82 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE... ........... ..._. ...... - .......... ............. .. ......... -- .................................. ............... $ 358.476,15 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE .... ..... - ........ .......................... .............. .......... ........ ...... ............. .............. , $ - DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED ....... ..... .-- ...... --- ...- ......................... $ - TOTAL. COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS. ... ---- .............................................. ............................... $ 358,476.15 RETAINEDPERCENTAGE ( 5.0% ) .._ ..............--.........,.........,..........,................. ............................... $ 17,923.81 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS...... .......... ...... ........... ..... .. ... _ ......... ,........................ ....... ...... ..... $ - NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE ................... ............................................._.... ............................... $ 340,552.34 TOTALAMOUNT PAIDON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES.. ... -- ..........................---- ....... ..,., .... -- ......... ...... .... ............ $ - PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE N0. 1 ......... ........ ................. -... ..... .............. ..-.. ................ _................... ........ $ 340,552.34 Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, all Items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: GMH Asphalt Corporation 9180 Lake Town Road Chaska, MN 55318 go Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENN}, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 1.�"'f"� "'\ By °� 'u"2�'` ,PROJECT ENGINEER Daniel jL/ lk Faulkner (' � f Date / / APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND I -1493- 1 T Y +q � r .. IMI ukt i • Illl �� EY..r1. �.. 4.qY �••: a _�T IfN (fR NPI y 1 q t J l' A' a 1I$ f, Y it }t kx .h' lcc p { s itd �tryt N S�tY 1x5} x' %lUY tilt tl��n�U tt � f 'V�:n�x Y �` — � „n, anti » \\ �. Ln \ �k <> � \ . � . \\ . sit » m Ln \ ? w ».-1497- «< y 2 «» w 2 E2 1498 1 _x -1499- a WN t * w 1 `a i¢ JU � ! Yaw 4 d✓, Jd. tr 'h i "sr. 1$ ' .'� r''Rt >u t. '"t�sic�r t' mall". Y �t t AM y 1 _x -1499- rNrltwo 4 mw�olt-mm N N N N 0 v `'' Lo N O -O O C = C1 _! U O O O O O O .O 6 �QU = J��: CLV)UO N N N N N N N N N N 0 CV C1 01 1\ 01 Oy t(7,CX? LCi Cf m V-4 CDu10LninorNr.r. on C a CL O7E 0 0- to �� iO O tp O a) vg O LA � C c to ? x -C3 cc 'ro W u a w Uj cn S u7 -1501- rq WAM now Ln \ \ # � MIM \dam ? 1502-1,-----J- 9 \ � ? ƒ Now � k co �) I �\ w � ) : v} �} � } a � � � } rq WAM now Ln \ \ # � MIM \dam ? 1502-1,-----J- 9 \ � ? ƒ Now � k co �) I « <�,? ^ � � : \ \ .. .. . . . \ \\ . � �� 2�� :� .. � \� : : . . \ � � : � 1 : / � � .. �� . « <�,? � � : \ \ � � � \�� < 2� ) � � \ \yew «� }� \ : y� :� y , � ;� � § � :� � 2 2� ) \� ƒ ® � � ) . � � } � � \ � � � � � � \? � ©, � } � } -1505i no ® � \ \. .. > . La \% \ -1505i no \. .. > . La \% \ I 4w vm : : \ 0 0 � © 0 } � ° \� ) /& <: 0 3 } Lo -1505i 7 2 - a t = . Yi fi to � � Q➢ >r y� m m ns b" C„ N+ ' ,L, ` a If 4 Pk o$ � a v a r ♦' iT �y bG 't W Ybndtt� { � C�p�i w � Y4NYe` m]�tl Kim -1508- 4J c fo (( 4 -J 3 K� C • 1 m � t L.2 Lm ti ro fo 3e fu y_ CCU Jc fo fl„ Q) a,' { LJJ....� le"I", ", La mm V � 1 a 1 J111�U1u 1 Ht i 1 114J Lo 1 lilt 11 S 'i 11 a 1 La e S y-`'YUleu{ 11 ii h 1j41'% K llt a t? T `t n;11 1 -1514- June 4, 2013 Kandis Hanson Mound City Manager 5431 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55365 -1687 Kandis, The following is the additional information regarding the LMCD's watercraft inspection program requested by the city council at the May 28th council meeting. (Watercraft Inspection Program) The 2013 watercraft inspection program is virtually identical the 2012 program. The LMCD coordinates the staffing of inspectors at four public accesses (Carsons, Cooks, Halsteads and Wayzata) from Memorial Day through Labor Day. The coverage times will be 11am - 7pm on Fridays, and 6am - 6pm on Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays. I have attached a chart of the coverage matrix for these accesses. You will notice that there are no hours scheduled for the Cooks Bay access during the Spirit of the Lakes Festival. The program costs for 2013 break down as follows: Level 1 Inspectors $34,524.00 Supervision $2,016.00 Training $1,575.00 Other $5,000.00 Total $43,115.00 These costs are the same as 2012 with the exception of the additional $5000. This would be used to purchase tablets that the inspectors would use during the inspection process. The DNR has eliminated the use of the older PDA devices. They have developed a new dynamic tablet application which asks specific questions of the boater, and based on the answers given, additional questions may be asked. The data collected in the tablet is automatically uploaded to a secure server once the tablet is within Wi- Fi range. The goal is to be able to collate all the DNR inspection data along with the data collected from inspection programs such as ours so that we can get a more accurate picture of inspection coverage and compliance rates statewide. However, after much discussion, the LMCD Board has chosen not to purchase these tablets at this time and will continue to collect data on paper forms and have those keyed into the DNR system. The program funding currently is as follows: MCWD Grant $21,577.50 DNR Grant $7,750.00 LMCD $13,807.50 Total $43,115.00 1515- The final amount of the MCWD grant would be 50% of the actual program costs. If we do not purchase tablets, the program cost would drop back to $38,115, thus the MCWD grant would drop to $19,507.50 and the LMCD portion to $11,307.50 1 have also included the 2012 Lake Minnetonka Watercraft Inspection Program Summary Report. In it, you will see the breakdown of the DNR's inspection coverage around the lake. It also includes information on what duties the inspectors may perform. For Cooks Bay, the DNR provided additional level 1 and level 2 inspectors at times not covered by the LMCD program. The presence of the decontamination unit last year would have occurred when level 2 inspectors were on duty. Given that the LMCD is only contracting for level 1 inspectors, no decontamination unit would be used at Cooks Bay, however, the DNR may choose to cover that access on occasion as it did last year. Based on the council's concern over the noise from the decontamination unit, I have asked the DNR how we can officially request to not have it used at that access. [Boat Launches through Public Access] In 2010, the DNR conducted a study to determine how many boats were launched at each public access. Of the 62,112 records launches, 2,799 occurred at the Cooks Bay access, or about 5 %. 1 have attached the complete study results for your perusal. [My thoughts on the inspection program] The current cornerstone of the DNR's AIS prevention strategy is its watercraft inspection program. The LMCD was one of the first local government units to conduct its own program to augment the DNRs coverage. This model is being replicated and encouraged across the state. I see the inspection process as a means of hands -on education. It creates awareness for those who are "unaware" and it helps to reinforce good boat "hygiene" practices. While there are those who would rather resort to more draconian measures (gates at accesses, watercraft confiscations, quarantine, etc), I think we'll achieve better compliance and change in boater behavior with emphasis on education rather than enforcement. As an angler who fishes Minnetonka and many other bodies of water, some infested, some not, I wouldn't be much of a sportsman if I didn't care about the health of our lakes and rivers. Many anglers find milfoil to be great fish habitat but other lake users (sailors and skiers for instance) may have a different opinion. Now the concern turns to zebra mussels and what the long time effects will be. We don't know that answer yet, and we'll learn to adapt to their presence, but like milfoil, we may find the management costs to our communities significant. We've spent over a half million dollars just in the past 5 years on milfoil management alone. And that doesn't include what individual residents have invested in vegetation control. Not getting an infestation in the first place should be the priority. And while it may be too late for Minnetonka for these two invasives, let's not get complacent and just not care anymore. We also have a responsibility to the environment and we don't need to be facilitating the dissemination of invasives out of Minnetonka. The only real way we'll ever prevent invasives from being transferred is through education and personal responsibility. This means we have to change people's attitudes and behaviors when they enter and leave the lake. It's not that hard to pick off weeds and pull the plug. The alternative will be that some lake associations and communities will attempt use the threat of AIS infestations to move toward privatization of our lakes and that simply cannot be allowed to happen. -1516- I launch all over the state about 80+ times are year. Having someone ask me the same questions and look over my boat is rarely an inconvenience. And for someone, that inspection experience did make a difference! Respectfully submitted, Jay Green LMCD Board Representative - Mound (612) 817 -6388 -1517- 01 1 Inspection F' Summary Report Partner Organizations: October 10, 2012 fil El N Prepared By: Greg Nybeck, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 23505 Smithtown Road (Suite 120) Shorewood, MN 55331 7 f1 � ,' �il � '7 PARK DISTRICT INTRODUCTION The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) coordinated a watercraft inspection program on Lake Minnetonka during the 2012 boating season. The two primary goals of this program were to: 1) inspect incoming watercraft/trailers, as well as educate watercraft owners and operators, to assist in preventing the introduction of new aquatic invasive species (AIS) into Lake Minnetonka, and 2) inspect outgoing watercraft/trailers, as well as educate watercraft owners and operators, to assist in preventing the spread of zebra mussels from Lake Minnetonka. This was a cooperative effort of the LMCD, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR), and Three Rivers Park District (TRPD). METHODOLOGY Nine of the 11 designated public accesses on Lake Minnetonka were covered as part of this program. The remaining two designated public accesses were not covered for the following reasons: 1) City of Minnetrista- Phelps Bay (there are only 4 designated car /trailer spaces), and 2) City of Tonka Bay- Echo Bay (there is no parking lot and on- street parking of car /trailer spaces is prohibited east of County Road 19). The following nine designated public accesses were covered in 2012: 1. City of Deephaven (Carsons Bay); 2. City of Minnetonka (Grays Bay); 3. City of Minnetrista (Halstead Bay); 4. City of Mound (Cooks Bay); 5. City of Wayzata (Wayzata Bay); 6. Hennepin County (North Arm); 7. Hennepin County (Spring Park Bay); 8. MN DNR (Maxwell Bay); and 9. TRPD- W. Upper Lake (Lake Minnetonka Regional Park). There were three different watercraft inspection components. These included: 1) MN DNR, 2) LMCD, and 3) TRPD. Further background of each component is detailed below. WATERCRAFT INSPECTION COMPONENTS MN DNR: In 2012, the MN DNR conducted Level 1 and 2 watercraft inspections on Lake Minnetonka (at no cost to the Lake Minnetonka community). In general, these Level I and 2 watercraft inspectors may: 1) inspect watercraft for plants, other aquatic invasive species (AIS), and water; 2) notify a licensed peace officer of alleged AIS violations; 3) deny a launch or use of Lake Minnetonka when deemed appropriate; and 4) require actions for problematic watercraft (i.e., remove plants, remove other AIS, or drain water). However, there are two additional authorities provided to Level 2 inspectors. First, Level 2 inspectors may visually and tactilely inspect the inside and outside of a watercraft (Level 1 inspectors may only inspect the outside of a Page 2 of 5 -1519- watercraft). Second, only Level 2 inspectors may conduct decontamination efforts when deemed necessary and appropriate. Level 1 and 2 inspections conducted by the MN DNR during peak times generally focused on the Grays Bay, Maxwell Bay, North Arm, and Spring Park Bay public accesses. Inspections conducted during non -park times included coverage at the majority of all Lake Minnetonka public accesses. Level 1 and 2 watercraft inspection hours conducted on Lake Minnetonka in 2012, as reported by the MN DNR to date, are as follows: Public Access Level 1 Level 2 Total Hours Carsons Bay 80.50 26.75 107.25 Cooks Bay 214.00 111.25 325.25 Grays Bay 975.25 977.75 1,953.00 Halstead Drive 60.00 0.00 60.00 Lake Mtka Regional Park 236.75 118.00 354.75 Maxwell Bay 702.00 834.25 1,536.25 North Arm 720.25 540.00 1,260.25 Phelps Bay 42.75 0.00 42.75 Spring Park Bay 825.00 588.50 1,413.50 Wayzata Bay 92.50 0.00 92.50 Total Hours: 3,949.00 3,196.50 7,145.50 ( *) The MN DNR has also reported an additional 836.50 hours for travel time for Level 1 and 2 inspectors. LMCD. The LMCD contracted with Volt Workforce Solutions (Volt), from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day, to conduct watercraft inspections at four public accesses on Fridays (11 a.m. to 7 p.m.) and Saturdays, Sundays, and Holidays (6 a.m. to 6 p.m.). These public accesses included: • City of Deephaven (Carson Bay); • City of Minnetrista (Halstead Bay); • City of Mound (Cooks Bay); • City of Wayzata (Wayzata Bay); and • As a substitute to the North Arm and Spring Park Bay public accesses when the MN DNR was unable to provide inspector coverage. Total contracted hours with Volt was 2,420, with 2,192 hours for inspections and the remaining 228 hours for training and supervision. Volt has invoiced the LMCD for 2,464 hours. There were two situations where Volt provided watercraft inspectors outside of the contract duration. First, Ron Schara hosted a Crappie Fishing Tournament on May 5th. During this event, 36 hours of watercraft inspections were conducted by Volt at the contracted public accesses for incoming and outgoing watercraft. This effort was complimented by Minnesota B.A.S.S. Federation volunteers and the MN DNR. Second, watercraft inspections were expanded after Labor Day to Page 3 of 5 -1520- include September 8th, 9`h, 15th, and 16th. This resulted in 192 hours of additional watercraft inspections. In 2012, there was an approved joint powers agreement (JPA) between the LMCD and MN DNR that authorized Volt watercraft inspectors. The JPA authorized Volt watercraft inspectors as Level 1 inspectors, whereas, Volt inspectors in 2010 and 2011 were classified as "volunteers ". The MN DNR provided a series of training sessions and 13 Volt inspectors were approved as Level 1 inspectors in 2012. TRPD: The TRPD provided an in -kind contribution to this program through gate attendants inspecting incoming watercraft/trailers at the Lake Minnetonka Regional Park. Weekends were covered from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. prior to the Memorial Day weekend, with seven day a week coverage from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day. These gate attendants were conducting inspections similar to the MN DNR and LMCD, which included educational and inspection components. Estimated in -kind hours contributed to this program were 1,000. This partnership has worked well and the LMCD hopes that it can continue in the future. FUNDING SOURCES There were three primary funding sources for this program in 2012. First, the MCWD provided a contribution of $7,500. Second, the MN DNR provided $7,750 of grant funds. Third, the LMCD budgeted $30,000 of AIS Management Funds. The LMCD greatly appreciates the financial contribution to this program by the MCWD and the MN DNR, as well as the in -kind contribution by the TRPD. SUMMARY A number of initiatives took place in 2012 relating to education and other AIS efforts. A summary of these initiatives include: Prior to the 2012 boating season, the MN DNR and Minnesota Waters educated and trained lake service providers as required by state legislation adopted in 2011. Training sessions were coordinated locally at the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum and Tonka Bay Marina. A database of local lake service providers, which the LMCD established in 2010, was a key contributing factor to this project. Joint educational press releases of the LMCD, MCWD, and MN DNR were coordinated in the spring and fall educating the general public on this new legislation and urging residents to use MN DNR certified lake service providers. Prior to the 2012 boating season, the LMCD introduced the Volt watercraft inspector arrangement with other public sector organizations. In 2012, Volt expanded its watercraft inspection services to Carver County, the Cities of Chanhassen and Eden Prairie, Lake Pulaski Improvement District, Minneapolis Park Board, and MCWD. Page 4 of 5 -1521- The inspection of incoming and outgoing watercraft should continue in 2013 on Lake Minnetonka. However, the LMCD Board of Directors needs to discuss the future role of the agency in how these inspections are funded. Two possible options include the following: 1. The LMCD could continue to take the lead on this project. Since the early 2000's, the LMCD has partnered with the MCWD, MN DNR and TRPD. All totaled, the LMCD has invested over $250,000 on watercraft inspections. One possible funding source in the adopted 2013 LMCD Budget is a $30,000 line -item for unspecified AIS management and prevention projects. 1 The LMCD could allow another public sector agency to take the lead on watercraft inspections in 2013. In particular, since the primary goal of the LMCD's efforts was to prevent the introduction of zebra mussels. One alternative for the $30,000 line -item is to spend all (or part) of these funds on whole bay or large scale herbicide treatment projects. Page 5 of 5 -1522- Boat launches through public accesses on Lake Minnetonka from mid -April to mid - November, 2010 This study was a cooperative effort of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Report prepared by: Tim Kelly MN DNR, OMBS Draft—November 23, 2010 -1523- Purpose The propose of the study is to measure the use of Lake Minnetonka public accesses during the full open -water boating season, extending from mid -April to mid - November. In the past, public access use was measured by aerial observation on a limited number of days, and the observations covered only summer afternoons. This study extends the seasonal coverage to the spring and fall, and extends the time of day coverage from afternoons to the full day (7 AM to 8 PM). Study results will be useful for allocating the effort of on -site access personnel, who work to minimize the movement of exotic species into and out of Lake Minnetonka. Methodology The study covered the open -water boating season from mid -April (April 17, a Saturday) to mid - November (November 14, a Sunday). The study involved counts by a field person of boats launched at 9 of the 10 public access sites; one small access site (Code A09) was excluded. At an access site, the field person counted the number of empty trailers, and trailerless car - toppers /pickups that appear to have launched a boat. Boats on trailers (or on car - toppers /pickups) were not counted as a launched boat. A01 Carsons Bay Access (City of Deephaven) A02 Cooks Bay Access (City of Mound) A03 Grays Bay Access (DNR / City of Minnetonka) A04 Halstead Drive Access (City of Minnetrista) A05 Lake Mika. Regional Park Access (Three Rivers Park Dist.) A06 Maxwell Bay Access (DNR) A07 North Arm Access (Hennepin County) A08 Spring Park Access (Hennepin County) A09 EXCLUDED: Tuxedo Blvd. Access (City of Minnetrista) A10 Wayzata Bay Access (City of Wayzata) During each week of the study, one sample weekday and one sample weekend day were chosen at random for counting the 9 public accesses. On each sample day, one time of day was chosen at random for the counts; the times of day are: early (7 to I I am), mid -day (I I am to 4 pm), and late (4pm to 8pm). The sequence of counting the accesses was varied at random to ensure that an access site was not always counted first or last. In the Fall, the early and late time periods were shortened for the later sunrises and earlier sunsets. Draft— November 23, 2010 -1524- A total of 61 counts were made at each access site during the study. This level of sampling is designed to produce a 95% confidence interval that is within +/- 20% of the overall estimated value, a common design criterion for MN Department of Natural Resource studies of this type. For example, if the overall estimated value is 100, +/- 20% is the interval from 80 to 120. Results Lake Minnetonka Conservation District staff conducted the field work for this study. Staff carried out all 61 counts on the date and time of day that are specified in the sampling plan. The estimated number of public access launches for the open -water boating season is 62,112 (Table 1). Most of the launches (68 %) occur during the summer, followed by the fall (20 %), and spring (12 %). Fall has more launches than spring simply because fall is longer. Note that the fall and spring have a similar number of launches per day (173 to 180). The summer has more than double the daily launches of the spring and fall. Weekend /holidays account for just over half of the launches (53 %). On a daily basis, weekend/ holidays have 2.5 times as many launches. The access with the most launches is Grays Bay (33% of total), followed by Maxwell Bay (22 %), North Aim (10 %), and Spring Park (9 %). The other five accesses account for 25 percent of launches. As noted above, the sampling level was designed to produce a 95% confidence interval within +/ - 20% for the overall launch estimate for the open -water season. The actual 95% confidence was +/- 21 %, which means the design criterion was roughly met. The variability in access use was underestimated going into the study. In the past, public access use was measured by aerial observation on summer afternoons. From these aerial observations, estimates were made of total summer launches by access. Those summer estimates are not that far off from estimates in this study, which provides some confidence to the extrapolation techniques used in earlier years (Table 2). The extreme closeness of total summer launches for the two estimates (bottom of Table 2) should be considered fortuitous, and should not be expected to occur regularly. Draft — November 23, 2010 -1525- Table 1 Boat launches through public accesses on Lake Minnetonka from mid -April to mid - November, 2010 Breakdown Number of launches Percent of launches Days for launching Launches per day Overall 62,112 100% 212 293 By season* Spring 7,275 12% 42 173 Summer 42,416 68% 101 420 Fall 12,421 20% 69 180 • Spring: April 17 to Friday prior to Memorial Day weekend (5/28) • summer: Memorial Day weekend (5129) to Labor Day (9/6) • Fall'. Day after Labor Day (9`7 to November 14 By day of the week Weekends and holidays 32,781 53 °% 65 504 Weekdays 29,331 47% 147 200 By public access ** Grays Bay 20,773 33% 212 98 Maxwell Bay 13,973 22% 212 66 North Arm 6,115 10% 212 29 Spring Park 5,470 9% 212 26 Lake Mtka. Regional Park 4,040 7% 212 19 Carsons Bay 3,197 5% 212 15 Halstead Drive 2,959 5% 212 14 Cooks Bay 2,799 5% 212 13 Wayzata Bay 2,786 4% 212 13 ** Tuxedo Boulevard Access excluded from study due to small size Draft November 23, 2010 -1 -5526- 4 Draft — November 23, 2010 -1527- 5 Table 2 Comparison of summer boat launches through Lake Minnetonka public accesses between this 2010 study and extrapolations from aerial boat counts in 2004 2010 summer launches 2004 summer launches Public access ercent (percent) Grays Bay 31% 34% Maxwell Bay 22% 25% North Arm 10% 13% Spring Park 9% 5% Lake Mtka. Regional Park 7% 9% Carsons Bay 5% 2% Halstead Drive 5% 5% Wayzata Bay 5% 4% Cooks Bay 5% 2% Tuxedo Blvd. 1% Total percent 100% 100% Total summer launches 42,416 42,037 Draft — November 23, 2010 -1527- 5 m P >�Ar I ( 201, n a o z v o' v Jq U 0.'c. a � Im N_1�lfl� •� -i_ n J „_ id N a Y 11' N r JI rl �O 2 N N CI rl vJ `i 7 r - L Y rl rni Y G t mmmm n nr _' wM m M� �{ Qmmmm U tq y „N! Q 0I F1 "Cl O CJ 'n jz % p y C 1 XI r rl C! fl JI T CI r1 JI V C 1 41 JI y) CL m.om�,rl AMm� 3i�momm � Y e,MMMM ! �!?. 3 " d _ Eu� ' 3 o �� 3 L 8"+ 3 �" UU 23 f+ U Ci x3c', '? uu 3 F' -1528- P >�Ar I ( 201, .®K,1N NFr0�� a LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Doti e` 23505 SMITHTOWN ROAD, SUITE 120 • SHOREWOOD, MINNESOTA 55331 e TELEPHONE 952/745 -0789 • FAX 952/745 -9085 Gregory S. Nybeck, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Ms. Kandis Hanson City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ms. Hanson: During the 2013 boating season, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) will be coordinating watercraft inspections at selected public accesses on Lake Minnetonka. This program, which commenced in the early 2000's, has been used to prevent the introduction of new aquatic invasive species (AIS) into Lake Minnetonka by inspecting incoming watercraft. More recently, the program has diversified into also targeting outgoing watercraft to prevent the spread of AIS (in particular zebra mussels) from Lake Minnetonka. Similar to the past boating seasons, the LMCD has contracted with Volt Workforce Solutions (Volt) to conduct these watercraft inspections from Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day. Inspections will be conducted Friday through Sunday and on holidays. See the attachment for further details on this project. One of the public accesses targeted for watercraft inspection is Cooks Bay. Therefore, the LMCD is requesting your signature on both copies of the attached Right of Entry Authorization for Watercraft Inspections form for the purpose of allowing Volt employees to conduct the inspections. Would you please sign both copies and forward one original to the LMCD office in the self- addressed, stamp envelope provided. As always, the LMCD appreciates your effort in this regard. Please call if you have any questions. Sinc 'prely, r Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Attachments -1529 - Web Page Address: tittp: / /www.Imcd.org a E -mail Address: Imcd ©lmcd.org 30% Post Consumer Waste To protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka. RIGHT OF ENTRY AUTHORIZATION FOR WATERCRAFT INSPECTIONS 1. DEFINITIONS The following definitions apply to the terms used in this document: LMCD means Lake Minnetonka Conservation District. AGENCY means City of Mound. WATERCRAFT INSPECTIONS means inspection of watercraft for harmful invasive species; ensuring that public water accesses are weed and debris free while inspectors are present; verbal communication of the laws and issues surrounding the existence, spread, and effects of invasive species to Minnesota's waters; distribution of written materials and exotic alert tags; collection of information and data necessary to evaluate the spread of invasive species, the effect of public awareness, the response of recreational watercraft users to the project, and other pertinent research information. PUBLIC WATER ACCESS means any public area designated for the primary purpose of launching and retrieving watercraft to an adjacent body of water. 2. PERMISSION TO ENTER The Agency gives permission to enter and occupy, for the purpose of Watercraft Inspections, the public water accesses administered by the Agency located at Mound Bay Park (Cooks Bay). The LMCD may exercise this permission through its employees, contractors and authorized volunteers. The LMCD may not transfer or assign this permission. This permission shall remain in force until revoked. The LMCD shall act with due care while on the property of the above agency and the LMCD and its employees, contractors and agents shall be responsible for damages, to the extent authorized and limited by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The Agency reserves the right to revoke this permission upon notification to the Executive Director of the LMCD. Agency TITLE: DATE: 368016v2 CLL LK 110 -4 -1530- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BY: L r 0 -- Gregor S ybeck TITLE: Executive Director DATE: 57/6-7/25 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: June 5, 2013 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application for Essential Service Buildings at Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility /Site PLANNING CASE NO: 13 -07 APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE: HR Green, on behalf of MCES (owner) ADDRESS: 6270 Westedge Boulevard PID NO. 23- 117 -24 -22 -0006 ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential SUMMARY At its May 14, 2013 meeting, the City Council held a public hearing to review the application submitted by HR Green, on behalf of owner /applicant Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) for a Conditional Use Permit for a site redesign and construction of new service buildings at 6270 Westedge Boulevard. As part of the public hearing, discussion took place on a number of issues including but not limited to, the height of the West Area Maintenance Building, exterior storage, typical site operations and buffering the adjacent residential uses. The Council tabled action to an upcoming meeting to allow the applicant to respond to questions and comments heard at the public hearing. Staff was also requested tc research and respond to the questions brought up about maintenance activities in the street related to pumping into manholes and the future reconstruction on Westedge Boulevard. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Modified Plan. A modified elevation drawing of the West Area Maintenance Building was submitted to the City on May 21, 2013 and shows removal of the clearstory and the addition of dormers on the west and east elevations. The submitted graphic shows the total height of the building at 35 FT from the 944.0 elevation to the building top. According to Mound's code, the building height on a hipped roof is measured from average grade to the mid -point of the highest roof. -1531- MCES Response to Comments from May 14th meeting. A detailed memorandum in a Q &A format was prepared by the MCES to respond to comments heard at the May 14`h public hearing. The applicant has indicated that the proposed elevation of the building has been lowered 11/5 feet which was a suggestion heard at the meeting. The original site plan included the planting of 16 evergreen trees. The MCES has not submitted a revised landscaping plan but has expressed their interest in working with City staff for development of an appropriate screening /fencing program to mitigate visual impacts including the the possible use of a berm and are also open to the type of fence to be installed (i.e. privacy fence, chain link with slats, etc.) Maintenance Activities and Schedule for Future Westedge Improvements. See below comments from Public Works Director Carlton Moore related to maintenance activities and the tentative schedule for reconstruction of Westedge Boulevard: • The City of Mound has a vacuum truck, commonly referred to as a vac truck, for cleaning out storm sewer catch basins, sewer manholes and sanitary sewer lift stations when needed. The machine vacuums out the material and puts it into the holding tank on the truck. When the holding tank is full the sanitary material is dumped into the sanitary sewer at the manhole in front of the MCES facility on Westedge Boulevard. • City staff contacted the supervisor of the MCES sewage transfer station on Westedge Boulevard about the usage of the manhole in the street for dumping. The MCES crews have not used the manhole for two years or more and no other cities use this location for dumping except Mound. Mound crews use this approved location approximately one to three times per week when we are in our heavy cleaning season. During this time we are using it during work hours. There have been a few times when we have had late night sewer backups that we have dumped into this manhole. According to the supervisor, the current plans do not include relocation of the dump manhole. The MCES also has a delivery once a month from a semi truck which unloads chemicals for odor control. This truck typically takes two hours to unload and it is only done during normal working hours. MCES staff must be at the facility at all times when these deliveries are made. • The proposed facility plans do not include any construction in the street. The reconstruction of Westedge Boulevard is tentatively schedule on the City plans for 2017. The City has intentionally left this as one of the last street projects in order to coordinate street construction with MCES plans for the reconstruction of their forcemain from their facility south to Bartlett / County Road 110. • Residents also asked for a contact person during the project. At this time the MCES has not indicated who that might be. We did inform them they need to be proactive in informing the area residents about the project, timing and contact information. MCES has agreed with our request. -1532- Neighbor Correspondence. See attached letter and email that were received following the May 14`h public hearing. M.S. 15.99 — Timeline for Council Action on the CUP. The CUP application was submitted on March 1, 2013. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule . "Day 1" was determined to be March 4, 2013 for the MCES application. The City executed a 60 -day extension on the CUP application on April 29, 2013. With the extension, the current deadline for City action on the application is June 30, 2013. Additional extensions must be provided by the applicant. REQUESTED ACTION Due to differing recommendations from Staff and the Planning Commission as well as the Council's tabling action on May 14th, a resolution has not been prepared in advance. Due to the upcoming deadline for agency action on the requested CUP application, action by the Council is required at the June 11th meeting, unless an extension is granted, so that a resolution can be brought back for formal action at the Council's regular meeting on Tuesday, June 25, 2013. -1533- MCES MOUND WESTERN MAINTENANCE FACILITY CITY COUNCIL & PUBLIC HEARING QUESTIONS AND MCES RESPONSES 5/24/13 Existing generator is noisy; the new one should point its exhaust to the north. RESPONSE — THE NEW GENERATOR WILL BE LOCATED FURTHER NORTH AND ITS EXHAUST WILL BE POINTED TO THE NORTH, AWAY FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS. 2. Will there be a "boneyard" in the new facility? RESPONSE —THERE WON'T BE A BONEYARD. SOME EQUIPMENT OR MATERIAL MAY NEED TO BE STORED OUTSIDE. THE AMOUNT AND DURATION OF ANYTHING STORED OUTSIDE WILL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM AND IT WILL BE ADEQUATELY SCREENED BY THE TREES ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE AND OTHER SCREENING AS REQUIRED. a. Will it be screened? RESPONSE - YES. 3. What about trucks dumping in the manhole at the intersection of Westedge and Setter Circle, at all hours of day and night? RESPONSE — THIS IS NOT A NORMAL PRACTICE. SEWER CLEANINGS ARE DISPOSED OF AT ONE OF THE MCES TREATMENT PLANTS OR OTHER DESIGNATED SITES INTENDED FOR THIS TYPE OF WASTE. IN A RARE OR EMERGENCY SITUATION A VACTOR TRUCK MAY DISCHARGE NORMAL WASTEWATER INTO THE SEWER ADJACENT TO THIS FACILITY. 4. Consider a berm with trees on top, for screening and to get the trees higher RESPONSE — WE WILL WORK WITH THE CITY STAFF TO DETERMINE A DIRECTION ON A POSSIBLE BERM. 5. Consider a chain link fence with privacy slats, or some other form of privacy fence. RESPONSE — MCES IS OPEN TO DISCUSSION REGARDING THE TYPE OF FENCE. MCES SECURITY WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT INPUT. 6. What activities are performed at this facility? RESPONSE — THIS FACILITY SERVES AS A BASE OF OPERATIONS FOR A CREW THAT PERFORMS MAINTENANCE ON THE LIFT STATIONS, PIPES AND OTHER FACILITIES PROVIDING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE TO THE LAKE MINNETONKA AREA. THIS SERVES AS AN OFFICE /LOCKER/SHOWER AREA, LIGHT MAINTENANCE OF COLLECTION SYSTEM COMPONENTS, MINOR VEHICLE AND SMALL ENGINE AND -1534- OTHER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE. IT ALSO FUNCTIONS AS A STORAGE AREA FOR VARIOUS EQUIPMENT ITEMS NEEDED FOR SYSTEM MAINTENANCE. 7. What materials are stored at this facility? RESPONSE - MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT AND SPARE PARTS FOR THE WASTEWATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES IN THE WEST METRO AREA. NORMAL MAINTENANCE MATERIALS SUCH AS CLEANING SUPPLIES, SMALL QUANTITIES OF MOTOR OIL, ANTIFREEZE, LAWN CARE MATERIALS, FILTERS, LIGHT BULBS, ETC. NON -TOXIC CHEMICAL USED TO CONTROL LIFT STATION ODORS IS ALSO STORED AND DISPENSED AT THIS LOCATION. a. Will they be stored outside on the site? RESPONSE — THIS FACILITY IS DESIGNED AND INTENDED TO PROVIDE INSIDE STORAGE FOR ESSENTIALLY ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR THIS FACILITY. ANY LIMITED OUTSIDE STORAGE WILL BE ADEQUATELY SCREENED. 8. What is the traffic generated by this facility? RESPONSE — ULTIMATELY, UP TO 16 STAFF MAY BE BASED HERE. THE TRAFFIC COULD INCLUDE 16 PEOPLE ARRIVING FOR WORK EACH MORNING AND DEPARTING AT THE END OF EACH DAY. IN ADDITION, MOST OF THESE PERSONNEL WILL DEPART THE SITE IN THE MORNING IN AN MCES TRUCK FOR THEIR JOB DUTIES, AND RETURN TO THE SITE AT THE END OF THE DAY. SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE IS 24 HOUR, 7 DAY A WEEK ACTIVITY AND THERE WILL BE A LIMITED AMOUNT OF OFF HOUR AND WEEKEND TRAFFIC TO AND FROM THE SITE. THERE WILL ALSO BE MINOR TRAFFIC EACH DAY RELATED TO DELIVERIES OF EQUIPMENT OR MATERIALS, TYPICALLY SEVERAL DELIVERIES PER WEEK. 9. What type of trucks and vehicles will beat this site? RESPONSE — MCES VEHICLES STORED AT THE SITE WILL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: a. APPROXIMATELY FIVE SERVICE TRUCKS. THESE ARE THE TYPE CURRENTLY STORED AT THE EXISTING MAINTENACE FACILITY. b. SEVERAL UTILITY TRAILERS CONTAINING SERVICE AND EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT. c. FOUR TO SIX TRAILER- MOUNTED GENERATORS OF THE TYPE CURRENTLY SEEN AT THE EXISTING MAINTENANCE FACILITY. d. MCES MAY BASE A VACTOR TRUCK AT THE SITE. THIS IS A LARGE, TANDEM AXLE VEHICLE USED TO CLEAN DEBRIS FROM MANHOLES AND LIFT STATIONS. THESE VEHICLES WILL BE STORED INSIDE THE PROPOSED MAINTENANCE FACILITY OR THE PROPOSED UNHEATED STORAGE BUILDING. -1535- 10. Why does the building need to be so high? RESPONSE - THE BUILDING HEIGHT IS DICTATED BY THREE FEATURES; THE DOOR HEIGHT, OVERALL SHOP HEIGHT AND THE NEED TO MAXIMIZE INTERIOR SPACE USING A MEZZANINE LEVEL. ACCESS TO THE GARAGE SPACE WITH TRUCKS CONTAINING LARGE SIZE MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLES SUCH AS THE VACTOR TRUCK. IT IS ALSO NECESSARY TO HAVE ADEQUATE INSIDE HEIGHT THE SHOP AREA TO LIFT LARGE EQUIPMENT OFF A TRAILER. THE 16 FOOT DOORS AND THE SPACE REQUIRED ABOVE THE DOORS IN ORDER FOR THEM TO OPERATE RESULT IN THE SILL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING BEING 20 FEET. THE DESIGN OF THE BERMUDA ROOF INCLUDES A 4 TO 12 SLOPE ON THE ROOF, WHICH IS CONSIDERED MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN A FLATTER ROOF; THESE PARAMETERS SET THE BUILDING HEIGHT, AS SHOWN. 11. Why do the doors need to be so tall? RESPONSE - THE 16 FOOT DOORS ARE NEEDED TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR A RELATIVELY TALL MAINTENANCE VEHICLE, SUCH AS THE VACTOR TRUCK OR A TRAILER WITH LARGE PIPE OR VALVE COMPONENTS. 12. Can some of the door heights be reduced? RESPONSE - SEE ABOVE. UNIFORM DOOR HEIGHTS ALLOW FOR A FULL FUNCTIONING BUILDING AND A CONSISTENT APPEARANCE. 13. Eliminate clearstory, use skylights or dormers (or windows at top of walls). RESPONSE - THE COUNCIL WILL ADOPT THIS SUGGESTION AND UTILIZE DORMERS AND HIGH ELEVATION WINDOWS ON THE WALLS TO ACHIEVE ENHANCED NATURAL LIGHTING. 14. Can building grade be lowered by pushing it further north? RESPONSE - WE HAVE LOWERED THE BUILDING GRADE BY 1.5 FEET IN RESPONSE TO CITY CONCERNS. ITS NOT FEASIBLE FOR THE COUNCIL TO LOWER THE BUILDING GRADE FURTHER BY MOVING IT NORTH. THIS WOULD RESULT IN A LOSS OF TREES, AND A GREATER AMOUNT OF IMPORTED FILL SINCE THE AREA TO THE NORTH IS LOWER. 15. What will we do to achieve "beautification" for the site? RESPONSE - THE COUNCIL IS WORKING WITH THE CITY TO MITIGATE VISUAL IMPACTS AND DEVELOP AN ACCEPTABLE DESIGN. THE COUNCIL ALSO WILL SCREEN THE SITE WITH PLANTINGS AND POSSIBLY A BERM, BASED ON RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED BY CITY STAFF. 16. How do we mitigate "stress on the neighborhood" from the enlarged facility? RESPONSE - THE MCES IS PROPOSING TO SCREEN THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY WITH TREES, THUS BLOCKING THE MAJORITY OF VIEW FROM -1536- Z a Q W J W S H4 4 Q: N m I �y ow] SEw i3m Z O F J W W. -1537- Z 0 > W J W 9 W@ Z O f W J W S F 0 ? O^ Z= T Ln Q City of Mound City Council Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Wastewater Treatment Facility 6270 Westedge Boulevard Essential Services Building Planning Case No.03 -07 I am a property owner very near to the current wastewater treatment plant. I have some concerns about what was proposed at the public hearing before the Mound City Council on May 14, 2013 regarding this facility. This facility is located deep within a large residential neighborhood. This fact requires that the buildings and site be as visually compatible as possible. 2. Visual screening with berms and pine trees as shown in the site plan is a must. The current pine trees left on the property and the large pine trees that were removed last winter have all had there lower branches removed negating the visual screening effect. Removing the lower branches on the pine trees should be prohibited to ensure the visual screening effect remains in effect for the future. 3. As stated by a representative from the Metropolitan council the L -38 building will have a generator inside of it. The exhaust needs to point towards the north towards the existing trees and wetland area. When the generator is in operation the total volume of noise should not exceed 85 decibels. 4. The large "steel barn" maintenance building needs to be at a lower site elevation to help reduce its visual impact on the adjoining residents. At the public hearing no drawing was shown of the L -38 building, but approval of this structure is included in the existing permit. If permit is granted the Metropolitan Council could build anything, regardless of appearance and physical height and this was the closest proposed building to residential homes. Could part of this structure be located within the ground to further reduce the visual impact on the neighboring residents? 6. Please include the "witch's hat" into a building design to help soften the industrial look within the property. As a nearby resident to this property I fully understand the importance of this facility to life in our modern society. That being said I also want the Metropolitan Council to be a much better neighbor in the future than they have been in the past. Ronald Headley 2611 Setter Circle Mound MN 55364 -1538- Sarah Smith Subject: Wastewater Treatment Facility Dear Sarah, I was unable to attend the meeting re: the Wastewater Treatment Facility, which is across the street from where I reside. My address is 2601 Setter Circle, which is on the corner of the cul de sac across the street from the facility. I, too, am concerned that the plan for building will detract from this residential area. I am an older single person and am planning to sell my home within the next five years, so 1 am concerned about the appeal of living in my home for re -sale purposes. Most immediately, I am obviously concerned about my own view from my property. I am also against the building of a high structure, so please take into consideration my concerns re: this. I agree with my neighbors that having a lower building towards the back of the property or having a building partially below ground would be best. I hope you will also take into consideration the landscaping of this facility and make it appealing since this is a residential area. Thank you, Cheryl Loffhagen Morrissey 2601 Setter Circle Momid, MN 55364 -15ql9- MCES — Page 2 April 29, 2013 if you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 952.472.0604. Community Development Director Cc: Chris Remus Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 390 Robert Street N St. Paul, MN 55101 -1541- }2] LL § ;3 e®° )\\ § u �!! , (,| ! !]; _ §(( � \(] ! ;!�) =I =!< ; : ;„ | §� \ [( g gqq @ L cz a ss� a _ @a g P�' sE 3 } LU Ill t it V� wE5?n� sg865ze %x" e° g U r q PEp ggS� ' �j fig8 ai, [E. Vi$ � £ 8 I O UIQL 3� Vic° g $rtgB §s ex 8c W °w ' s t Eo � g � §g E�€ F a &$ R n? $ UOz a 2 g pit ;.: p M s Eg »g z Fsa a € s ge$ °$ g s� Lu M s fln z" 0 o w 0 YQ QZ q8q 1 2_ a �Q Zi %% p s I o C 1 c , I a I 1 h� 1 � §li �1' • -'` I ItiV .VY P t 1 �R,�� AN 1 ) Al p , qq l G d e l 3 ' \\ \444 MEMORANDUM June 6, 2013 To: City Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Re: Ordinance Amending Chapter 6 of the Mound City Code (Alcoholic Beverages) At the May 28, 2013 Council meeting, a request was made to extend the time liquor could be sold from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m, essentially following state law and removing additional restrictions on the hours of operation that currently exists in the Mound City Code. In addition, the Council discussed the relationship of serving time and closing time. Staff was directed to prepare language to amend the code to follow state law, which is included in the attached Ordinance. Entity Mon — Sat Begin Mon — Sat End Sun Begin Sun End Mound (Current) 8:00 a.m. 1:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m. 12:00 a.m. State Statute 8:00 a.m. 1:00 a.m. / 2:00 a.m. with permit 10:00 a.m. 1:00 a.m. / 2:00 a.m. with permit The 2003 omnibus liquor bill moved back from 1:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. the hour at which on -sale of intoxicating liquor and 3.2 beer must cease, subject to obtaining a special permit from the state. The same change is made for the hour at which establishments with "consumption and display" permits (bottle clubs or set -ups) must stop consumption on the premises. Although the hour set in law is often referred to as the "closing hour," state law does not require establishments to close their doors at that hour but only to stop selling alcohol. A requirement to actually close may be included in local ordinances. The Mound ordinance does address the serving time and closing time, and, therefore, the proposed amendment also addresses allowing another %2 hour after selling time for closing time. This Ordinance is lengthy, so it will be published by summary, which requires the separate resolution. Please let me know if you have any questions. -1544- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES The City Council of Mound does ordain: That Article II, Intoxicating Liquor, Division 2, License, Section 6 -46, be hereby amended as follows: (b) On -sale Sunday Liquor. ON -Sale Sunday licenses authorizing intoxicating liquor sales in conjunction with the serving of food may be issued to any club, hotel or restaurant which has an On -sale Liquor License. A club, hotel, or restaurant holding an On -sale Sunday intoxicating liquor license, may serve alcoholic beverages in eenjunetien ° :a, the serving of fee between the hours of 11�00 a.mf 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnigh 2:00 a.m. Sundays in conjunction with the serving of food, provided the licensee's establishment is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (Minn. Stat. § 144.41 1 et seq.). No licensee may sell intoxicating liquor on -sale between the hours of 1.00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. unless the licensee has obtained a permit from the Commissioner of Public Safety and paid any applicable fees. That Article II, Intoxicating Liquor, Section 6 -52, Conditions, be hereby amended as follows: (7) Hours of operation. No sale of liquor may be made between the hours of 1:000 a.m. 2:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on the days of Monday through Saturday, and aft -ti.- 400 -a. m. between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. on Sunday. No licensee may sell intoxicating liquor on -sale between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. unless the licensee has obtained a permit from the Commissioner of Public Safety and paid any applicable fees. Every A room, place, or premises where liquor is permitted to be sold, including cafe, restaurant, or dining room operated in connection therewith, pursuant to an "On -Sale" license, shall be may remain open elese and4ept °'e°ea to the public for a period of not more than 30 minutes after during the times when the sale of liquor is prohibited under this subsection. During said hours when the premises is required to be closed, no person shall be allowed to be or remain within such room, place or premises, for any purpose whatsoever, except that the owner or licensee, his agents, servants, or employees, may be and remain there for the purpose only of cleaning, preparation of meals, necessary repairs, or other work in connection therewith. That Article III, 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor, Section 6 -81, Hours of Sale, be hereby amended as follows (a) No 3.2 malt beverage or 3.2 malt liquor shall be sold, or served or consumed on the licensed premises between I-40 2:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. on the days of Monday through Saturday, nor between 140 2:00 a.m. and 12j00 Been 10:00 a.m. on Sunday. No licensee may sell 3.2 malt beverage or 3.2 malt liquor on -sale between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 2:00 a.m. unless the licensee has obtained a permit from the Commissioner of Public Safety and paid M applicable fees (b) l veF A premises where such 3.2 malt beverage or 3.2 malt liquor is permitted to be sold, pursuant to a 3.2 malt beverage "On- Sale" license, may remain open to the public for a period of not more than 30 minutes after daring the times when the sale of 3.2 malt beverage or 3.2 malt liquor is prohibited by state law under this subsection. During said hours when the premises is -1545- required to be closed, no person shall be allowed to be or remain within such room, place, or premises, for any purpose whatsoever, except that the owner or licensee, his agents, servants, or employees, may be and remain there for the purpose only of cleaning, preparation of meals, necessary repairs, or other work in connection therewith. Passed by the City Council this 11`" day of June, 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Harms Published in The Laker the 81n day of June, 2013. Effective the 91h day of June, 2013. -1546- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. - 37 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY, AS IT RELATES TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound has adopted Ordinance No. _-2013 amending Chapter 6 of the Mound City Code as it relates to alcoholic beverages; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4, allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances; and WHEREAS, the following summary of Ordinance _ -2013 has been approved by the City Council of the City of Mound as clearly informing the public of the intent and effect of the Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound has reviewed the following summary of the ordinance and approved its publication in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4: Ordinance _ -2013 has been approved by the City Council of the City of Mound. The Ordinance amends Chapter 6 of the Mound City Code as it relates to alcoholic beverages by changing the language for establishments holding an on -sale liquor license, on -sale Sunday liquor license, and/or 3.2 malt liquor license to follow state law regarding hours of operation and allowing closing times to be no later than %2 hour after the selling time established in state law in Mound City Code Sections 6 -46, 6 -52 and 6 -81. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk keep a copy of the entire text of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post the entire text of the ordinance at the Westonka Public Library in the City. Passed by the City Council this I lb day of June, 2013. Mayor Mark Banns Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1547- 420825vl MUM MU220 -2 I IuT__Imine] :7•�►il"7TuI June 6, 2013 To: City Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Re: Electric and Gas Franchise Fee Ordinance Amendments Request to extend the period for the Sunset Clause At the May 14, 2013 Council meeting, the request to extend the period for the Sunset Clause was tabled until more could be learned about a possible allocation of LGA to the City of Mound. While it looks probable that the City will receive some LGA, I request the Council approve the extension of the period for the Sunset Clause for the following reasons: • Uncertainty with the 2014 Budget exists at this point in the planning process and we should keep all option on the table. • Levy limits may be put in place for 2014. • The City will be challenged to eliminate the General Fund 2013 budgeted use of reserves of $204K. • The City tax capacity is projected to decrease another 3% for 2013, which will drive our tax rate over 60 %. • Gas and electric franchise fees provide diversity in our General Fund revenue streams. The Auditor noted our high percentage of revenue from property taxes. Monthly and quarterly receipts help provide cash flow between the semi - annual tax settlements. • The Mediacom cable franchise fees should also be considered as they are not as evenly distributed across the population, but rather generated only by Mediacom subscribers. • LGA has proven to be unreliable as the formulas change or state budget pressures cause it to be revoked. When uncertainty exists, it is more prudent to use these funds for one -time capital expenditures or projects thereby reducing the need for bonding. Electric franchise fees generate $147,000, gas franchise fees $125,000, and cable franchise fees $105,000, a portion of which is given to the LMCC for programming and services. Staff recommends the approval of the attached ordinances to extend the sunset dates until December 31, 2016, recognizing the fees cannot be totally eliminated in the near future. The amount of the fees for 2014 will be discussed and can be amended during the 2014 budget discussions that will take place in September. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 08 -2003 IMPLEMENTING AN ELECTRIC FRANCHISE FEE ON NORTHERN STATES POWER D /B /A EXCEL ENERGY FOR PROVIDING ELECTRIC SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUND The City of Mound does ordain: That Section 1, Subd. 8 of Ordinance No. 08 -2003, be amended as follows: Subd. 8. Sunset Clause. This Ordinance shall automatically sunset on D..Gember 34, �� December 31, 2016 unless the City Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date. The City Council may unilaterally renew or extend the fee on the same terms and conditions. Without waiver of any rights under Minnesota law, the City Council shall seek agreement from Company if the City intends to change the fee rate or fee design. Passed by the City Council this 11th day of June, 2013. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Published in The Laker on the _ day of June, 2013. Effective on the _ day of June, 2013. -1549- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 05 -2003 IMPLEMENTING A GAS FRANCHISE FEE ON CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO FOR PROVIDING GAS SERVICE WITHIN THE CITY OF MOUND The City of Mound does ordain: That Ordinance No. 05 -2003, Section 1, Subd. 8, be amended as follows: Subd. 8. Sunset Clause. This Ordinance shall automatically sunset on Deoe"'mw- "^ "'r31, 2013 December 31, 2016, unless the City Council acts to renew or extend the fee at least six (6) months prior to the sunset date. The City Council may unilaterally renew or extend the fee on the same terms and conditions. Without waiver of any rights under Minnesota law, the City Council shall seek agreement from Company if the City intends to change the fee rate or fee design. Passed by the City Council this 11`" day of June, 2013. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Published in The Laker on the _ day of June, 2013. Effective on the _ day of June, 2013. -1550- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13- RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 13 -35 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 12 -107 ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, on December 11, 2012 the City Council approved Resolution 12 -107 adopting a fee schedule; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2013, the City Council approved changes to the way Lost Lake Slips would be licensed; and WHEREAS, the new method of licensing requires a change in fees for Lost Lake Slips in order to achieve the desired outcomes; and WHEREAS, the language adopted in Resolution 13 -35 to reflect these changes contained some errors that require clarification; and WHEREAS, the City Council has agreed to reduce the fee for non -Mound residents or Lost Lake residents for second slip due to marketing challenges; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota hereby adopts Resolution No. 13 -_ to amend City Resolution No. 13 -35 Resolution Amending Resolution No. 12-107 Adopting Fee Schedule for the following fees: DOCKS: 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Mound residents er who are not nen Lost Lake Residents) $1,950/yr 78 -121 Lost Lake Slips Multiple (to Non -Mound residents or non Lost Lake Residents for second slip) $2,600%r- 2 050/ r Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of June, 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1551- Mayor Mark Hanus 1MV115077_� I�IIIifil Date: June 6, 2013 To: Mayor Hanus and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Subject: Lost Lake Slips I would like to propose two changes to assist in the marketing of the Lost Lake Slips. Lost Lake Slip Fees for Non - Residents or Lost Lake Residents for Second Slip The weather coupled with a significant fee increase for non -Mound residents has shrunk demand for the Lost Lake Slips requiring further consideration. Advertising efforts to date include: Craig's List, classified ads in The Laker and Lakeshore Weekly, Lakeshore Weekly "Back on the Water" Section advertisement, sandwich board sign on CR15 & CR44, posted flyers at Westonka Public Library , Caribou, Dock and Lift, Jubilee, Harbor Wine, and information on the City website. Mound residents are still showing demand and therefore Staff recommends keeping the rate at $1,950, but decreased demand from non -Mound residents suggests the rate should be lowered. Staff's recommendation is to lower the Non -Mound Resident Rate from $2,600 to $2,050. This way Mound residents can help recruit friends /family with boats. Staff believes too large of a differential (> $100) would deter that. Please note this is the first time a rate differential existed between residents and non - residents for Lost Lake slips. Also note that as the townhomes are built out, the number of slips available to Mound and non -Mound residents will decline and this is considered a short- term issue. Mound residents will continue to have priority over non -Mound residents through the first Monday in May of each year. -1552- Current Status as of 5/31/13 2012 Season Final Lost Lake Resident (Prima Slip) 5 4 Mound Resident 16 26 Non -Mound Resident 2 7 Available 14 0 Total 37 37 Advertising efforts to date include: Craig's List, classified ads in The Laker and Lakeshore Weekly, Lakeshore Weekly "Back on the Water" Section advertisement, sandwich board sign on CR15 & CR44, posted flyers at Westonka Public Library , Caribou, Dock and Lift, Jubilee, Harbor Wine, and information on the City website. Mound residents are still showing demand and therefore Staff recommends keeping the rate at $1,950, but decreased demand from non -Mound residents suggests the rate should be lowered. Staff's recommendation is to lower the Non -Mound Resident Rate from $2,600 to $2,050. This way Mound residents can help recruit friends /family with boats. Staff believes too large of a differential (> $100) would deter that. Please note this is the first time a rate differential existed between residents and non - residents for Lost Lake slips. Also note that as the townhomes are built out, the number of slips available to Mound and non -Mound residents will decline and this is considered a short- term issue. Mound residents will continue to have priority over non -Mound residents through the first Monday in May of each year. -1552- Callers inquiring about the Lost Lake slips often ask if overnight street parking is available, similar to a marina. Staff is proposing overnight parking by permit only from June 15f to September 30th for Lost Lake Slip license holders. Correy Farniok, Orono Police Chief, and Carlton Moore, Public Works Director, have approved this recommendation. A laminated permit referencing the license number will be given to Lost Lake Slip holders who request one, and they will be required to place it on their dashboard for the Police Officers to view. In addition, signs will be posted in designated areas of Auditor's Road indicating where the overnight parking is to occur. Staff requests approval of the resolutions contained on the following pages. Please email or call me with any questions. -1553- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13- RESOLUTION TO PERMINT OVERNIGHT PARKING IN AUDITOR'S ROAD DISTRICT BY PERMIT ONLY FOR LOST LAKE SLIP LICENSE HOLDERS WHEREAS, in order to improve the marketability of the Lost Lake Slips, and WHEREAS, no on- street parking is currently allowed between 2 a.m. and 6 a.m. in the Auditor's Road District, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: 1. That permits may be issued upon request to Lost Lake Slip license holders for overnight parking on Auditor's Road 2. Overnight parking permits will be valid from June 1s' through September 30 " of each year 3. That permits clearly state the vehicle license plate for which the permit is granted and no more than one permit will be granted per slip 4. That an area of Auditor's Road parking be designated and signed for the overnight parking to facilitate enforcement Adopted by the City Council this 11"' day of June, 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -1554- May 30, 2013 City of Wayzata Mayor: Kenn Willcox 600 Rice Street city Connell: Wayzata, MN 55391 Jack Amdal -1734 Andrew Mullin Tom Tanner Bridget Anderson City Manager: Heidi Nelson The Honorable Scott Zerby City of Shorewood 5755 Country Club Road Shorewood, MN 55331 Re: Invitation for Participation in a Lake Minnetonka Regional Scenic Byway The Honorable Mayor Zerby: I am writing you on behalf of the City of Wayzata to explore your community's interest in working with the other thirteen Lake Minnetonka communities on a regional scenic byways initiative. The purpose of a regional scenic byway system is to tie together all of our communities' historic, scenic, and cultural amenities that are connected through various historic roadways' around Lake Minnetonka to create an important marketing and branding opportunity for this area. The City of Wayzata became aware of the opportunities that a scenic byway system may provide through the work of a few dedicated citizens who were interested in preserving the important scenic qualities of Bushaway Road/ County Road 101, which is part of a Hennepin County project in 2014. As a result of this work, we created a local scenic byway designation for the historic roadways that connect Wayzata to the lake, similar to what Orono and Minnetonka Beach did a few years ago. In addition, we are conducting a community engagement process to better understand the desires of our residents and business owners as it relates to enhancing our waterfront presence. We view a regional scenic byway system throughout the Lake Minnetonka area as a low cost way of repurposing existing assets to draw business and tourism to region as a whole. We have started a conversation with other Lake Minnetonka communities and the Three Rivers Park District about the potential of an area scenic byway. I have attached a packet of information to give you some perspective on the scenic byway concept, I would like to schedule a meeting with you in the coming weeks to discuss this opportunity with you further. You can contact me at 952- 922 -5569 or KenwillcoxAwavzata orE. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me Sincerely, Ken Willcox Mayor Pnone:952 -404 -5300 Pax: 952404 -5318 1555555 -tail: city@wayzata.org home Page: www,wayzata.org Proposal for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway {Prepared by lion Anderson, Wayzata} Why create a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway? To Protect Resources: An official byway makes it easier to argue for preserving natural, scenic and historical resources. To Enhance Community Recognition: State and National byways increase the visibility of a road corridor, the communities connected, and the resources available. To Enhance Community Pride and Vision: Byways connect communities and promote the importance of historical sites, and the richness of natural, scenic and recreation resources, To Encourage Partnering: Not only do byways bring communities together, but also they suggest reasons for cooperative activities involving businesses, nonprofit organizations, and voluntary groups. A sense of common good may emerge and help to guide improvements in the lives of all residents in the byway corridor. To Boost Economic Development: Perhaps the most tangible benefit from byway designation comes from economic development. This results from booth tourism and increased use of business services by residents within the byway corridor. This can result in more community pride and vitality. Slight increases in traffic are a small price to pay for improving the image of the Lake as a whole and appreciation of its resources. For example, have you been to Gale Woods or the Excelsior Museum or the Burwell House? Read down the list in Table 1, which contains about 140 °attractions" around the lake to see how many of these pieces you have not experienced. Think also about the future. If we do not do more now to preserve natural and historical resources, they may be lost to future generations. What is a scenic byway? A "scenic byway" is a transportation corridor recognized for one or more archeological, cultural, historic, natural, recreational and scenic qualities. If can be designated as such nationally, by a State, or by a local unit of government. We seek official recognition of a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway by the State of Minnesota. Minnesota's Scenic Byways Program has so far approved 22 scenic byways in the State. Funds can be awarded by the state or national scenic byway programs for planning, conservation, preservation and marketing activities of potential byways, The National Scenic Byways Program administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation is a grass-roots collaborative effort established to help preserve and -1556- enhance selected roads throughout the United States. The National Scenic Byways Program has funded 2,926 projects for state and nationally designated byway routes. What is Proposed for a Lake Minnetonka Scenic Byway? The Lake area has been divided into four scenic routes in the two maps below. The first map shows the Eastern portion of the Lake as the main scenic byway with a side or auxiliary route from Wayzata to Minnetonka Mills, which in the early days before the Gray's Bay Dam was part of Lake Minnetonka. On the first map, the main scenic byway route is shown in pink and the Minnetonka Mills side route is marked in green. The starting point of each route is marked as mile 0 (zero) and the other numbers along the route are the distances in miles from the starting points. The second map (Neap 2), gives the western end or the lake including not only the Upper Lake but also the headwaters area to St. Bonifacius. This Western route is marked in blue. A side or auxiliary route along North Shore Drive is marked in purple. Each of the two main routes adds up to about 20 miles in length for a total of 41 miles. The side (auxiliary) routes add an additional 11 miles, The scenic byway plan as now conceived involves the following 14 communities: Excelsior Orono Oeephaven Shorewood Greenwood Spring Park Minnetonka St. BornTacius Minnetonka Beach Tonka Bay Minnetrista Wayzata Mound Woodland However, there are only four principal Chambers of Commerce and six Historical Societies. (See Table 2 for a list.) Thus, the organization work will be less demanding than it might seem. Among the many pieces of this project that remain to be completed is a complete listing of the key historical sites around the lake. A preliminary list of about 50 historical sites is embedded in both Tables 1 and 2 However, this list is not complete. Note that no current residences are included in the list of historical sites because of privacy considerations. The current list of sites is not yet completed, as most of the existing historical commercial buildings in Excelsior and Wayzata are not yet included. The historical societies will be solicited for help in making a complete list. The workshop on June 21, led by Bill Neuman, will begin to clarify the remaining work to be done and how best to organize to get all of the cities and organizations around the lake to work together. -1557- >7 ww jlcm�sl' 0 i I ba un 15158- I "A J MG < .... . . . IMF,, 2 E- < co 0 0 m uQaziLoF - ° °+� c cc W'R t.s W'v 42 I z C\i vi 4 ui 0 .... . . . IMF,, 2 =3 Im L =1 CU M u CL 'D (nu -1559 I t Table I I 1,grg munnerogiiia osenic LsMaj (Pro oosed Routes with �rilctlorfsf d Pla es -1 Route mile I _Jlit_tre!q!S_n or A I A. Main- §2gnic _Piace Smay Route I A 0 1 Aftyzata Blvd at Freeway Exit for Go, Rd. I ol South. 7M A 0.5 , Bushaway (Co Rd, 101) and McGinty (Co. 1 ) intersection —Sweatts A 0,7 Locust Hills Trail and Old Barn A -i- 1,3 1-5— us awe Causeway Between Grays Bay and W=v=t� R� 1-6 Gray's Bay Public Access &Manna gay's McKenzie Rd off �� Pt R�—'- A 61 Grovetand Community an Minnetonka RIvrf at 101 (Ty Abel's Ueephaven (;dV Line Minnetonka Blvd continues on Maplewood A 2,9 A 3.5 Thorpe Park A 4,3 Minnetonka t31vd continues right on Carscife Bay Boulevard Deen A 4.6 A A 4.7 6 Minnetonka Yacht Club and Carson's Bay Br dge Deephaven �9_q H'all'__ C21La ewood Rd to Cottagewood General Store (0-3 mile) k Crossing of Minnetonka Rigii3naf —LRTTred with Perin A 5 A 5 7 Greenwood City Limits 6.6 Old Lo Q Theatre A 61 Greenwood Marina A 13,13 7 _T1 St Albans Bay Bridge Excel Marina End of Trolley Line A 7.5 Port of Excelsior and Excelsior �Commons/Parkffieach- ]A Dock Cinema and various other historical sites in Excelsior §cuFhLakeExcelsiorChamber Commerce. �_=WatWdt Excelsior Old public School at 260 School Rd& Excelsior Hi oh A4 A A 7.7 Excelsior History Society and Museum and Excelsior Trolley Line begins Crossing VI "AV Minnetonka IULtiflKa MagI01701 L!� I Trail with PaLN Hl wa 19 intersection wimilvaterst. A 8.2 A 9.1 KShomwood City Hall 9� Mali at S Mail at Smithtown Rd A 9.7 oo Manitou Park A 10.2 Old Orchard Park (on West side , ofroafii__ D,3 Tgnka Bay City Hall 0.7 nk ka Bay Manna and Carib] To a Bay Rd. to Ton Caribbean Marina A 10,9 1 Old Channel Bay -Navarre City Line Gray Freshwater Laboratory Co Rd, 15 (Shoreline Dr.) intersection �w__ fin Co Rd- 19 12A A 142.2 :K��l 2 5 Minnetonka Beach City Hall 5 -1560- A — 13 1 St Martins Church and Westwood Rd. to historic Lafayette Bay Country ClYUb-.------ �'r,.2"on 13.6 a Beach City Park A 13-8 Orono City line, A 13 Smith's iiay A 14.1 A 14.6 Highway 51 (N, Shore Dr,) Intersection with Co. (Shoreline DL.) A 14.8 .R.16 Sailors World Marina A 15.3 Brackets Point A 15.5 Tanager Lake A 1 15.7 Browns Bay Marina and N. Shore Marina East A 16 Orono Orchard Road 16,5 Ferndale Marsh A " Shoreline elin, 1, (Co. Rd IS) exits toward Wayzata 17.1 W—dZ h "I Count Club A 17.6 Slake School Ferndale Road South and Grove Lane East Wayzata 8eaah and Re�ionatTrait Parking Wayzata Boat Works and Wayzata Marine I7.8 -A A A 18 18.1 -182 _Wayzata Train Depot, Historical Society & Chamber of Commerce 8,,5- Wayzata Waterfront (Lake Street) and various historical sites A -k- - - - 18-7 - Wayzata (Lake St & Superior Blvd) -Promenade of Wayzata (Old Wayzata Bay Center) A 19.2 -Colonial Mail (Wayzata Blvd & Central) A 197 Bushaway Rd (Co. Rd 101) and Wayzata Blvd (Co, Rd. 15)-- B, Minnetonka Mills Aux. Scenic Bvwav Route 0,2 Wayzata New Muni (Lake Wayzata Say Shops and Wayzata Bay Center B 05 -Ti; Wayzata Public Access (continuing on McGinty West (Co. Rd, 16) Wa-yia"t'a-Yacht Club B O-StBushaway(Co. Rd, 101) Intersection with McGinty West (Co . 7i� 2 T; Rufus Rand House (RT!_qa,rkfll tLejdq 8 3.5 End of McGinty West at Minnetonka Blvd (Co. Rd, 5) B 3.6 j 494 Overpass over Minnetonka Blvd S 4,1 Intersection with Plymouth Rd (Co. Rd. 61) B 4,2 Historic Burwell House —and 'Buin�WCJ'Vark, 13209 McGinty Rd East 4,2 Mill Cottage and Mill Office/Workshop, 13209 McGinty Rd East 4,2 Walking Tour of Old Minnetonka Mills, 13209 McGinn Ad_East 41.3 Heading West on Minnetonka (Co. 8 5 . 9 Minnetonka Government and Community Center and Ice Arena 6. 9 Fairchild Ave and Grays Bay Blvd to Grays Say Dam 1A Gro Tonke' Park B 7,5 -7-9 Groveland Cemetery and Gfoveland School Intersection of Minnetonka Blvd with Co. Rd. 101 (Ty Abefs Comer) C. Western Scenic B X Route jUgper Lake and Gate Woodsl C O + 0.1 1 Smithtown Rd Intersection with Mandou Rd (Co. Rd. 19) Minnetonka Countrypub �,Smith�t,�nlft aid�Cos��ng, f Lake,-M.tlk-aLRT Trail -1561- C C 2 2 Howairds Point Road to Howard Point & Marina Peter Gideon Farntntme,_24690 Glen Rd (off Howard Point Rd) C 3.2 La q �Vira!qj Public Boat Access j_j; -- C 3.5 Hwy7tumwest -'Cyk—eZumbra C 4.7 :1 irinetrista Q!K Line -------- 2 Co. Rd. 44 North intersection C 5.2 and Beach 1-take (0.2 miles north on Co Rd 44) ? 5.: 27[7 � rlmnp Historic District 0 Crane C— 9.12 Carver Park Access C 1U M. Six Mile Marsh 10,9 on St. Bonifacius; C 11�2 Dakota Dakota Trail Crossin HCRRA F�th 11,5 '5 Main Main St Co. R. 92 Goin North C 11 �5 on Li�rary St, Bonifacius Public , Librag 1116 Bartlett Blvd (Co. Rd. 110? Going East—'-- 14,6 1 Entrance to Gale Woods and CrossingDakota — Trail - C 14.6_ L Entrance to Westonka Recreational Park Iii --is—1 Halstead Drive to lublic access to Halsted Sa Cqoqq!kS"s Ba Park with .public; access , Lake Minnetonka Area Chamber of Commerce q323 Commerce Blvd Mounds Aa intersection of Co. Rd (Co 110 with Shoreline Blvd C, Rd, 16) C 18.2 i Mound businesa district and Mound City Hall —! —c C 18.3 1 Lost Lake and Marsh tb,4 C 18.5 Old Tonka Toys fact— 19.2 Salon Bridge 2q! !S rin Park City Line 0 C 1 20,2 OldTonka To Headquarters C 20.2 County Sheriff Water Patrol C 20,3 i Sunset Drive (Co. Rd, C 20.3 1 SPrigg Park C!b(Hall. (Spring Park g!Lme:ntar -6ctiuol Warren Ave 20.3 f Westonka Yacht Club C-'-----20.3 Public boat access and restroorn C 20,8 i Casco Point Circle Park ;end ofi�sremcloo lnter�seebonofi��A.Rd.16w�ithCoRd-�I North Share Dr. Aux. igWL9.B wa uto D o Co. Rd. 15 (Shoreline Dr.) intersection with Co. Rd 19 Coffae Brid a and jLord fziqjLch!Kr. Old Lake D 1.1 Hendricksons Brad 1.2 Public Beach Access andi"restroome 1.3 1 Wavzata Marine 1.6 North Shore Marina D 2.1 Noerenberg's Brig 2.3 Noerenberg Memorial Park Minnetonka Art School D N' Crossing of Dakota Rail Trail 3.4 End of N. Shore Dr, (CO. Rd. -1562- Additional Resources of Proposed Lake Minnetonka Proposed Scenic Byways Including Historical Attractions by City, Historical Society, Chambers of Commerce, Parks and Preserves, and Trails Historical Attractions by City o Excelsior • Excelsior Historical Society & Museum, 305 Water St • Old Excelsior Public School Bldg., 261 School Ave (1899) • Excelsior High school (1916) • Trinity Episcopal Church Chapel, 300 Second St (1863) in National Register • Dock Cinema, 26 Water St • Oak Hill Cemetery, Excelsior Blvd • Excelsior streetcar line (1906) • Minnehaha Steamboat at Bayside Marine u Deephaven • Minnetonka Yacht Club • Cottagewood General Store, Cottagewood (1893) y Greenwood • Greenwood Marina • The Old Log Theater Minnetonka • Burwell House, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1883) • Mill Cottage, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1894 moved) • Mill OfficeNVorkshop, 13209 McGinty Rd E. (1894 moved) o Minnetonka Beach • Camp Memorial Chapel (1888) now St Martin's on the Lake Chapel • Lafayette Country Club (1899) • Minnetonka Beach City Hall o Minnetrista • Crane Island Historic District e Mound • Mound Baptist Assembly Grounds (l 900) now Highland Park • Bridge to Halstead's Bay (1 890) • Former Tonka Toy factory (1967) Orono • Noerenberg Estate (now Memorial Gardens0 (1903) • Woodhill Country Club (1917) Shorewood • Crane Island Historic District • Peter Gideon Farmhouse 24590 Glen Rd, (1854) site of horticultural experiments • Howard's Point — the last area Indian Settlement (1911) Spring Park ! 1563- • Tonka Toys Headquarter Bldg, and Tower • Henn, Co, Water Patrol • Casco Point Commons • Spring Park Elementary School, 4349 Warren Ave (1906) now City Hall c St, Bonifardus • St Bonifacius Public Library e Tonka Beach • The Narrows Channel (1883) • The Narrows Bridge (1910) o Wayzata • Wayzata Train Depot (Great Northern), 402 Lake St E • Wayzata Post Office, 229 Minnetonka Ave S, (1941) • Wayzata Congregational Church, 605 Rice St (1916) now the Unitarian church • Meyer Bros. Dairy, 105 Lake St E, (1941) • Old Drug Store, 275 Lake St E, (1920) • Wayzata State Bank Bldg., 305 Lake St E, (1922) • Kallestad Building, 401 Lake St E, (1875) • Wayzata Country Club • Locust Hills Sam, 500 Bushaway Rd c Woodland • Gillette Stone Arch on Stone Arch Rd off 101 & Breezy Point Rd (1912) • Groveland Methodist Assembly Grounds (1909) • Breezy Point, formerly Spirit Knob, a Dakota Indian Sacred Site Historical Societies o Carver County Historical Society * Excelsior o Lake Minnetonka Minnetonka, 14600 Mtka Blvd o Wayzata ,a Westonka Chambers of Commerce • Excelsior • Lake Minnetonka Area (2323 Commerce Blvd, Mound) • Wayzata Parks and Preserves Baker Park Reserve Carver Park Reserve • Lowry Nature Center Gale Woods Noerenberg Memorial Park c, Minnesota Landscape Arboretum 9 -1564- o Island Preserves • 3!g Island • Crane island (National Historical Places) • Wawatasso Island • Wild Goose Chase island • Trails o Luce Line Trail c Dakota Trail (also called Hennepin Co. Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA)) o Lake Minnetonka LRT Regional Trail (also called Hennepin Co, Regional Rail Authority (HCRRA 10 -1565- PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES Thursday, April 11, 2013 Present: Vice Chair Todd Peterson; Commissioners Derek Goddard, Gina Nettle, and Brian Roath Absent: Council Representative Heidi Gesch, Chair Mike Wilkus, Josh Dunwoody Others Present: Director of Public Works Carlton Moore Public Present: None Chair Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Move Item 5 to May agenda. MOTION by Goddard, seconded by Roath, to approve the agenda as amended. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MARCH 14, 2013 MINUTES MOTION by Nettle, seconded by Peterson, to approve the March 14, 2013 minutes as submitted. MOTION carried unanimously. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS — None DISCUSS: DOG PARK Roath queried the commission as to their role in the development of the park. He introduced a 4 Phase approach including: Phase 1 Build Support / Assess Interest / Establish a Task Force Phase 2 Research Other Communities and Set Requirements Phase 3 Identify Locations and Explore Partnerships Phase 4 Propose Options and Estimate Cost Peterson thought that all phases could be accomplished by the commission and then bring results and recommendations to the City Council. -1566- Nettle jumped to Phase 3 as she knows there is a lot of support in the community. Discussion ensued about properties in Mound and found it lacking. Roath was to contact Three Rivers but felt he needed further direction. He will contact them to see if one is in the plans. Other discussion included the WRA Park in Minnetrista, Dog Days committee involvement, funding, survey at Dog Days (interest, demand, willingness to pay fee, emails of interested persons), small dog vs. big dog park, funding, formation of an interest group, newsletter, posting signs at key parks, animal hospital and Jubilee. Carlton recommended checking with Heidi regarding setting up the interest group, newsletter and posting signs. Brian will draft some examples and communicate with Heidi. Questions arose regarding the meeting outside of a regular POSC meeting. Commissioners were unclear what the policy is and the reasons behind it. DISCUSS: PARK TOUR PLANNING Discussion included funding for repairs, a rating sheet for use and top priority parks. Jill is directed to email rating sheet and commissioners will visit their assigned parks before the next meeting. DISCUSS: ADOPT -A -GREEN SPACE / PARK CLEAN -UP Adopt -a -Green Space discussion continued to May 9th Park clean -up discussion postponed until May 9th. REVIEW: 2013 CALENDAR No changes. REPORTS None. MOTION to adjourn by Nettle, seconded by Peterson. MOTION approved unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 8:11 p.m. Submitted by Jill Norlander -1567- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 7, 2013 Chair called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners David Goode, George Linkert (7:03), Cindy Penner, Kelvin Retterath & Pete Wiechert; Absent: Douglas Gawtry, Jeffrey Bergquist & Mark Wegscheid. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Planning Commission Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Sheryl Martin (resident); Keith Anderson (HR Green); Ellen Luken (architect) APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION by Ward, second by Goode, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION by Wiechert, second by Goode, to approve the April 2nd and April 16`h minutes as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS A. PLANNING CASE NO. 13 -07 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6270 WESTEDGE BOULEVARD APPLICANT: MET COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REVIEW OF BUILDING HEIGHT Smith indicated that the building height for the West Area Maintenance Facility building is considered to be within approved limits according to City Code, but it was felt that additional information and clarification would be helpful for the Commission. She explained that the "clear story" portion and the main roof functions together as one unit. Ellen Luken (architect for the MCES project team) assisted with explanation of details. Retterath indicated that this is a stretch for him. Code is fairly consistent and clear. Are we setting a precedent? He disagrees strongly with the interpretation that this is one roof. Penner inquired as to the height of the "clear story" feature. Luken stated that it was approximately 6 feet 8 inches. Keith Anderson (HR Green) explained that this facility was going to be a west metro hub for the MCES utility crews. -1568- Linkert understands the importance of the standards and really likes how visually creative the proposed building is. He commented that it is set back off the road quite a bit and is much more interesting than the existing building. This is clearly a utility use. Wiechert said that it is visually appealing and an effort to match the design that Mound is trying to encourage in the commercial district. Not sure where the impact would come for the residential area. It's a benefit to the community. Goode asked the architect what affect it would have to lower the roof. Luken replied that this is the lowest pitch that one would want. It won't have the "barn" look without it. Ward asked if the MCES considered other areas as the new hub. Anderson said that the focus was on Mound. Whether they went somewhere else they would still maintain this site because they need the lift station here. Smith gave direction to the Commission for amendment or rescinding of the original recommendation to the Commission. She complemented the MCES staff for their cooperation and for providing the additional information which provides transparency for the process. MOTION by Linkert, second by Wiechert, to amend the previous recommendation to include the new information. Voting for: Wiechert, Linkert; Voting against: Goode, Penner, Ward, Retterath. Discussion Retterath does not believe this is a single roof and we are not measuring to the highest point. He disagrees with this approach and believes this opens the door for future precedent to other projects in the City to the point that our building height requirement becomes irrelevant. Wiechert asked if they have an idea about what the plan would be if this design wouldn't go through. Luken indicated that they would lower it to where it needed to be and all it would affect would be the aesthetics of the building. MOTION by Ward, second by Goode, to rescind the previous motion approving the plans. MOTION carried. Voting for: Goode, Penner, Ward, Retterath; Voting against: Wiechert, Linkert. MOTION by Ward, second by Retterath, to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit with findings as discussed including the height of the West Area Maintenance Facility building which exceeds the City height regulations Discussion Retterath understands the hours that have gone into this plan. His concern is the precedent that may be set for future projects. He didn't want them to abandon the clear story. -1569- Ward talked about modifying the design for conformity and bringing a revised plan to the Council. He also complimented the MCES on their partnership with the City. Smith stated that it appears the Planning Commission's concern is that current design is inconsistent with the height regulations and requires modification and that another option could be a variance. MOTION carried. Voting for: Retterath, Ward, Penner, Goode; Voting against: Linkert, Wiechert. B. PLANNING CASE NO. 03-18 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD CITY HALL AND PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS Smith introduced the plan to move City Hall into the Public Safety Building and subsequent exterior remodeling including the parking modifications along Wilshire Boulevard, relocation of landscaping, changing out of signage and canopy on the north side entrance door. Relocation will occur in October. Parking modifications will begin sometime in June. The discussion included the location of the crosswalk, maintenance and use of the outside stairway and the plan for handicapped parking. Linkert brought up the idea of reverse angle parking MOTION by Goode, second by Penner, to recommend approval of the CUP amendment. MOTION carried unanimously. OLD /NEW BUSINESS Sarah indicated a need for a second meeting in May. MOTION by Ward, second by Linkert, to schedule an additional commission meeting on May 21, 2013. MOTION carried unanimously. Retterath wants the accessory building discussion at the next meeting. Staff Update: Smith reported the following: Lost Lake Villas are progressing; Downtown marketing study results coming shortly (real planning stuff); a couple of applications are being reviewed. At the request of Linkert, Smith reviewed the results of the Sojourn application. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Ward, second by Goode, to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Noriander -1570- MINUTES May 21, 2013 Chair Ward called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward, Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, George Linkert, Cindy Penner, Pete Wiechert and Councilmember Mark Wegscheid. Members absent: Retterath. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith. BOARD OF APPEALS Review of the City's parking regulations was included on the Planning Commission's work list for 2013. Smith provided an overview of the some of the topics she suggests be reviewed as part of the study including possible reductions for non - useable space, shared parking and day /night. Also, review of existing sites that are not changing in size or intensifying the use. Discussion of the public /private parking supply and how the overall parking system functions also took place. Smith mentioned the downtown parking study that was done by Walker Parking and it was suggested that copies be provided to the Planning Commission. Staff will begin reviewing parking regulations for communities with similar characteristics. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Linkert, to adjourn at 7:50 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Sarah Smith -1571- Metropolitan May 29, 2013 Kandis Hanson, Manager City Of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd Mound, MN 55364 -1687 Dear Ms. Hanson: Tneb vear, the Metropolitan Co,mcil prepares pop»lation and household estimates as of April 1 of the previous year. Local governments are invited to review and comment on the preliminary estimates. The Council will certify final estimates by July 15 for State government use in allocating local government aid and street aid. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City Of Mound ha 9,210 "e le and 3,997 households as of April 1, 2012. Household size averaged 2.30 persons per household. With this letter, the Council is reporting the data inputs used to develop the preliminary estimates for your community. The Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing stock, occupancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources include housing stock, manufactured home parks, and group quarters data maintained by Metropolitan Council Research, as well as U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey data. For more information on the Council's population estimates model, please visit the Council's website at http: / /stats.mete. state. mn.us /stats /aboutestimates.aspx or contact Todd Graham at 651 -602- 1322. Council staff welcomes discussion of the 2012 preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or specific objections, in writing, by June 24. Please send any written comments or questions to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 North Robert Street, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e -mail to todd.graham @metc.state.mn.us Sincerely, Todd Graham Principal Demographer 390 Robert Street North e St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 a (651) 602 -1000 . Fos (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity En gayer 2012 Annual Population Estimates Mound city, Hennepin County, Minnesota Households: 3,997 Housing Total: 4,382 Occupancy Rate: 91.21% Population in Households: 9,201 Average Household Size: 2.302 Population in Group Quarters: 9 Total Population: 9,210 Metropolitan Council's Annual Estimates account for housing stock changes since April 1, 2010. These include housing units permitted and other changes. Other changes are due to demolitions, building conversions (units added or lost), city boundary changes (units annexed in or out), and other changes reported by city and township staff. The Council assumes that 85% of multifamily and 95% of single - family units permitted in 2011 were completed and occupiable by April 1, 2012; the remainder are occupiable in the future. Manufactured homes are counted each year from Metropolitan Council surveys of manufactured home park operators and local governments. Other housing (boats, RVs, etc. used as housing) is an estimate from the most recent Census ACS estimates. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate and average household size. Starting with the 2011 -12 cycle, the primary data are the most recent American Community Survey estimates, calculated and adjusted as described in the Council's methodology, available online at http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/aboutestimates.aspx Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit. The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent. Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) is counted separately through an annual Metropolitan Council survey. Housing Stock Permitted and Other changes Housing Stock Population April 1, 2010 built since 2010 since 2010 April 1, 2012 Single- family- detached: 3,273 14 -11 3,276 Townhomes: 253 0 0 253 Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units: 103 0 0 103 Multifamily units: 737 0 0 737 Manufactured homes: 13 737 92.01% 13 Other (boats, RVs, etc. as shelter): 0 Manufactured homes: 13 0 Housing Total: 4,379 38 Other: 4,382 Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate and average household size. Starting with the 2011 -12 cycle, the primary data are the most recent American Community Survey estimates, calculated and adjusted as described in the Council's methodology, available online at http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/aboutestimates.aspx Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit. The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent. Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) is counted separately through an annual Metropolitan Council survey. Housing Stock Occupancy Occupied with Persons Per Population April 1, 2012 Rate 2012 Households Household in 2012 Single - family- detached: 3,276 91.06% 2,983 2.458 7,331 Townhomes: 253 91.06% 230 2.458 565 Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units: 103 95.08% 98 3.002 294 Multifamily units: 737 92.01% 678 1.435 973 Manufactured homes: 13 60.00% 8 4.717 38 Other: 0 Counted only if 0 1.600 0 occupied Housing Total: 4,382 Households: 3,997 In Households: 9,201 In Group Qtrs: 9 Total Population: 9,210 -1573 - Metropolitan Council 5/28/2013 City of Mound Vehicle Compliance Agreement I am required by my department head to commute in the vehicle listed below due to the on -call nature of my job. I understand that the vehicle assigned to me is a qualified non - personal use vehicle and I will not use the vehicle for more than de minimis (minimal) personal use to and from work. Description of Vehicle Driven 2013 Ford F -150 #113 Ernployee Printed Name m 1 yee Signature/Datee� l M ger's signature 2 G / to -1574-