The URL can be used to link to this page

2015-04-28 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CI TY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. 0a T I I. MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 2015 — 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent A eenda . Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page I. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 821 -848 *B. Approve minutes: Mar 24, 2015 regular meeting 849 -856 Apr 14, 2015 regular meeting 857 -859 Apr 15, 2015 special - Emergency Management 860 Apr 15, 2015 special - Annual Reports 861 Apr 22, 2015 special - Emergency Management 862 *C. Adopt Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Construction Materials 863 -864 Testing Proposal from Braun Intertec for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Improvement Projects — West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvements and West Three Points Boulevard Street Improvements, City Project No. PW -14 -01 *D. Adopt Resolution Approving Construction Cooperative Agreement with the 865 -886 Metropolitan Council for the Inclusion of MCES Sanitary Sewer Pipe Improvements with the Tuxedo Boulevard Improvement Project, City Project No. PW -15 -02 *E. Adopt Resolution Ordering Preparation of Engineering Report for Proposed Trunk 887 -888 Watermain Installation on Wilshire Boulevard, Bartlett Boulevard to Bradford Lane *F. Adopt Resolution Accepting Bid for the 2015 Lift Station Improvement Project, 889 -890 City Project No. PW -15 -04 *G. Adopt Resolution approving Public Gathering Permit for 2015 Fishers of Men 891 -894 special event at Centerview Beach *H. Adopt Resolution approving Public Gathering Permit for 2015 Minnetonka 895 -898 Classic special event at Surfside Park & Beach *I. Adopt Resolution reaffirming Resolution No. 14 -39 approving minor subdivision 899 -902 at 2201 Centerview Lane and correcting clerical errors (Planning Case No. 14 -05) *J. Adopt Resolution reaffirming Resolution No. 14 -40 approving variances at 903 -904 2201 Centerview Lane and correcting clerical errors (Planning Case No. 14 -06) PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. *K. Action on resolution approving review of variance application for deck 905 -922 construction at 4917 Island View Drive (Planning Case No. 15 -05) *L. Action on resolution approving review of variance application for new 923 -976 house construction at 5103 Windsor Road (Planning Case No. 15 -07) *M. Action on resolution approving review of variance application for garage 977 -1000 construction at 2180 Cardinal Lane (Planning Case No. 15 -06) *N. Approve permit for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for the Northwest 1001 Tonka Lions - Coach Bingo Event at The Gillespie Center, May 17, 2015 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Update on City of Mound and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 1002 -1012 Collaborative Work Plan A. Brian Simmons, Assistant City Engineer B. Ray Hanson, Public Works Superintendent, on the Draft Emergency Operation Procedure (EOP) plan C. Stewart Simon, Field Officer, on the GovDelivery notification system 7. Stewart Simon, Field Officer, requesting action on recommendation for approval 1013 -1034 of an Annual Dangerous Dog Fee of $500.00, in accordance with MN Statute 347.51 8. Planning Commission Recommendation Public Hearing for review of application for amendment to Conditional Use 1035 -1072 Permit for "The Landings on Lost Lake "project -- Planning Case No. 15 -02 Applicant: Mark Saliterman on behalf of Lost Lake Homes and Marina LLC Requested Action: Adopt Resolution granting approval of an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit and the First Amendment of the Subdivision Agreement for a Planned Unit Development for The Landings on Lost Lake (Planning Case No. 15 -02) 9. Discussion of Metropolitan Council 2015 draft local forecasts and allocation 1073 -1074 of housing need, including any required action 10. Council Member Kelli Gillispie with request for discussion on rental housing code 1075 -1088 11. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: C. Reports: Fire Commission: Apr 22, 2015 1089 -1093 Accountability 'Rally Point" 1094 D. Correspondence: Mediacom letter: Apr 17, 2015 1095 -1096 Letter: Hennepin County Health: Mar 13, 2015 1097 Letters: Hennepin County Library Dir: Apr 2, 2015 1098 Mayor Wegscheid: Apr 14, 2015 1099 12. Adjourn Note. This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas maybe viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site. wia ty. citvolmound cold. WE Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Apr 27 -- 4:30 -6:00 -- Villas new home development near Caribou private open house by special request Apr 28 -- 6:00 -- Emergency Response Training -- All Council and some Staff Apr 28 — 6:30 — HRA regular meeting Apr 28 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting May 1 -- Open House - The Langdon consignments 1 -year anniversary May 4 -- Seasonal Hours begin May 9 -- 8 -3:00 -- Recycling Day - partnership with Minnetrista, on their grounds May 12 — 6:55 — HRA regular meeting May 12 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting May 26 — 6:55 — HRA regular meeting May 26 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting June 6 -- 3 -12:00 -- Mound Fire Department Fish Fry and Dance June 9 — 6:55 — HRA regular meeting June 9 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting June 10 -- 8:00am -- Police Commission Meeting -- Mayor Wegscheid and /or Council Member Gesch June 11 -- Open House at Orono City Hall -- City Hall expansion and garages for police cars July 14 — 6:55 — HRA regular meeting July 14 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting July 16 -18 -- Spirit of the Lakes Festival July 28 — 6:55 — HRA regular meeting July 28 — 7:00 — CC regular meeting Aug 4 -- Night to Unite Aug 22 -- Westonka Dog Days Festival - (new date) Oct 30 -- Seasonal Hours end Nov 1 -- Daylight Saving Time ends Nov 19 -- 6:00 -- Tree Lighting Ceremony City Offices Closed May 25 Memorial Day July 3 Independence Day City Official's Absences May 13 -15 Kandis Hanson - professional development Inquire in advance, please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision - making. You may email the relative department head and copy the City Manager to expedite the answers to your questions. Music in the Park 2015 - All at Surfside at 7pm, except July 9 at the Harbor District June 11 June 18 June 25 July 9 July 16 July 23 CITY OF MOUND CLAIMS 4-28-15 MEETING YEAR BATCH I 2015 041615CTYMAN l 1 161 M to] 2015 /4 •. •i 4 WmAl • '. tell] $ 2,737.49 3,511.00 1,531.55 1,454.31 $ 943.05 . 1 1 C � -821- 227,061.80 CITY OF MOUND 04/16/15 4:44 PM j Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Batch Name 041615CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $1,829.30 Payments Computer DollarAmt $1,829.30 $0.00 In Balance Refer 3 SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic AUTOREAD SOFTWARE SUPPORT UTILITY $892.24 BILLINGS 4 -18 -15 THRU 4 -17 -16 Invoice FM15000627 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic AUTOREAD SOFTWARE SUPPORT UTILITY $892.23 BILLINGS 4 -18 -15 THRU 4 -17 -16 Invoice FM15000627 2/13/2015 Transaction Date 4/16/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,784.47 2TRUE VALUE HWS _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies TRASH BAGS $14.42 Invoice 123495 3/24/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies 5,000 CT 1/4" STAPLES $11.52 Invoice 123606 3/27/2015 Transaction Date 4/10/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.94 Refer M � 1 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -322 Postage FED EX SHIPPING- WOODWORKERS $18.89 Invoice 123371 3/18/2015 Transaction Date 4/10/2015 Fund Summary 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND HARDWARE Wells Fargo 10100 10100 Wells Fargo $18.89 $892.24 $892.23 $25.94 $1,829.30 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,829.30 Total $1,829.30 Total $18.89 CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 042115CTYMAN Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2015 User Dollar Amt Computer Dollar Amt $2,737.49 $2.737.49 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 CARQUEST OF NAVA_RRE (P/t49 _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs OIL & FILTER KIT #209'09 FORD F550 Invoice 6974 - 241471 1/7/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs TRACTOR BULB #209'09 FORD F550 Invoice 6974 - 241486 1/7/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs TANK HEATER- WELL #3 Invoice 6974 - 241646 1/9/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BATTERY'04 FORD F350 Invoice 6974 - 241646 1/9/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs FRICTION RDY CALIPER - #309'09 FORD Invoice 6974 - 242255 1/2012015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs ANTIFREEZE EXT LIFE- 3 GALS Invoice 6974- 242524 1126/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs ANTIFREEZE EXT LIFE- 3 GALS STOCK Invoice 6974- 242589 1/26/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BATTERY & CALIPER RETURN CREDIT Invoice 6974- 242716 1128/2015 Project 15 -3 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 2 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/W) Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RELAY ACCESSORY #15 Invoice 6974 - 243513 2/11/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SWITCHES, #315 Invoice 6974- 243384 2/9/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BULB #512 Invoice 6974- 243206 2/5/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs IN -LINE FUSE HOLDER #315 Invoice 6974 - 243514 2/11/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RELAY ACCESSORIES, PIGTAIL Invoice 6974 - 243516 2/11/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 14 GAUGE WIRE #315 Invoice 6974 - 243539 2/12/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs PARKS -FLOOR LINERS BLACK Invoice 6974 - 243541 2112/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs MOSSY OAK UB SC- PARKS Invoice 6974- 243542 2/12/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs RELAY ACCESSORY RETURN CREDIT Invoice 6974 - 243546 2/12/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BATTERY Invoice 6974 - 243649 2/13/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs AIR CHUCK, COUPLER PLUG, MOSS OAK UB SC PARKS Invoice 6974 - 243868 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BRAKE ROTORS, PADS, FRICTION ROY CALIPERS- #1504 PARKS Invoice 6974 - 243987 2120/2015 -823- 04/20115 1:40 PM Page 1 $88.85 $121.54 $63.90 $175.49 $146.22 $62.01 $62.01 - $254.49 $465.53 $19.56 $17.32 $13.98 $9.42 $69.36 $8.79 $124.83 $52.78 - $19.56 $122.59 $63.85 $399.08 CITY OF MOUND 04/20/151:40 PM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Invoice 122390 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122399 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122924 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BRAKE FLUID #1504 PARKS $6.06 Invoice 6974 - 244030 2/20/2015 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs CALIPERS, BATTERIES RETURN CREDIT - $158.90 Invoice 6974 - 244078 2/23/2015 E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs 1 MIL GAGE- PARKS $51.47 Invoice 6974 - 244186 2/24/2015 Invoice 122805 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs BLACK FLOOR LINERS -11 F 550- PARKS $124.83 Invoice 6974- 244188 2/24/2015 2/19/2015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total �... W.,......, $905.46 Refer = n.....,.....».,.a„ .............».. .,.�..._....„,„..�.....�„�_a,m. 3 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 3" ADAPTER, CLR PVC CEMENT $10.33 Invoice 122390 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials #213 ARMY GENSET- SHOP ELBOWS, $42.25 Invoice 122390 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122399 1/26/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122924 2/24/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122658 2/9/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122705 2/1112015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122732 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122733 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122737 2113/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance Invoice 122746 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122749 2/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122797 2/1712015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122800 2117/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122805 2/17/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122839 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 122898 2/23/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 122961 2/26/2015 NIPPLES, Project 15 -3 WATERPROOF VELCRO, HEVYHINGE- $17.80 SEWER ROOM FRESHENER SPRAY, DISH SOAP- $6.73 SHOP SUPPLIES Project 15 -3 AERATOR RETURN CREDIT 45.39 EXT MOUNT TAPE- TRUCK #315 $6.74 5 50 LB ICE MELT, FEBREEZE, 49 FAST $812.92 MELT 50 LB MELTER SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $2.02 SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, AA BATTERIES $6.73 QUICK CURE, SHIMS, SURGE PROTECTOR- $27.69 CITY HALL SPRING CLAMP, LOCKING C CLAMP $29.68 MINI BRUSH SET, SEMI RND STEP BI -3 $243.83 KEYS, THREAD SEAL $4.68 16 PK AA BATTERIES $25.98 FASTENERS /STRIP $4.31 CLEANERS, SOAP, SCRUB SPONGE, $51.07 ANTIFREEZE SS CLAMP $4.48 i � _ CITY OF MOUND 04/20/15 1:40 PM Page 3 Payments GBTY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122964 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122970 2/26/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 122990 2/27/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122854 2/20/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 122855 2/20/2015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND CART FILTER, LIQUID NAILS, NUTS, BOLTS, SCREWS 25 PK 1/2 DR PINS 50 PK 1/2 PLASTIC STAPLE 30UT ROTAT SURGE TAPE RETURN SURGE TAPE UNIV DC POWER ADAPTER Wells Fargo 10100 Wells Fargo $2,087.72 $281.16 $368.61 $2,737.49 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,737.49 Total $2,737.49 r� $49.66 $5.39 $3.41 $10.79 $5.40 10100 Total $1,366.50 CITY OF MOUND 04/20/1511:20 AM Page 1 Payments / - --'- GG�"Y OF tV(t7€J�iD Current Period: April 2015 Batch Name 042215CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $2,968.22 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $2,968.22 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair STEERING STABILIZER -'86 CHEW K20- $33.59 UNIT 333 GRASS RIG Invoice 6974 - 244440 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair V -BELTS #33 GRASS RIG $15.38 Invoice 6974 - 244887 3/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair SWITCH- DOOR JAMB ENGINE #40 $11.56 Invoice 6974 - 245252 3/17/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair STEERING STABILIZER & DAMPER RESCUE $47.65 UNIT #34 Invoice 6974 - 245692 3/24/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair BOAT PUMP UNIT #28- FUEL LINE & CONN, $100.03 COUPLERS Invoice 6974 - 245947 3/30/2015 Transaction Date 4120/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total . m..,,__a .....�.. -. �„_ ,. _ ..... ..... .. .. .....e- .....-. r,,...._„. e.. .�......,.�m...,.,m.,........�_ ..w,. w....,,_.., $208.21 Refer 4 G & K SERVICES _ - -- . �� -- Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -2 -15 $57.60 Invoice 1006777827 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -2 -15 $64.43 Invoice 1006777827 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -2 -15 $66.18 Invoice 1006777827 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -2 -15 $116.09 Invoice 1006777827 3/2/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -9 -15 $57.48 Invoice 1006789209 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -9 -15 $64.21 Invoice 1006789209 312/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -9 -15 $63.51 Invoice 1006789209 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -9 -15 $77.50 Invoice 1006789209 312/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -30 -15 $57.60 Invoice 1006823460 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -30 -15 $64.43 Invoice 1006823460 3130/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -30 -15 $66.18 Invoice 1006823460 3/3012015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -30 -15 $116.09 Invoice 1006823460 3/30/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -16 -15 $57,77 Invoice 1006800551 3/16/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -16 -15 $64.60 Invoice 1006800551 3/16/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -16 -15 $66.35 Invoice 1006800551 3/16/2015 -826- CITY OF MOUND 04/20/1511:20 AM _ -- Page 2 Payments -" CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 i z�r,�h1Mm"USa" AO��' ' aCri °uFw1+1;a�^"ui+"� "n�u°7�vA� a7' Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -16 -15 $120.60 Invoice 1006800551 3/16/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -23 -15 $67.13 Invoice 1006800551 3/23/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -23 -15 $72.69 Invoice 1006800551 3123/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -23 -15 $73.17 Invoice 1006800551 3/23/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -23 -15 $344.54 Invoice 1006800551 3/23/2015 Project 15 -3 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,738.15 Refer � 3 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -2 -15 PARKS $42.41 Invoice 1006777829 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -2 -15 PARKS $82 "51 Invoice 1006777829 312/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -16 -15 PARKS $42.41 Invoice 1006800552 3/16/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -16 -15 PARKS $82.51 Invoice 1006800552 3/16/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -30 -15 PARKS $42.41 Invoice 1006823462 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -30 -15 PARKS $82.51 Invoice 1006823462 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -9 -15 PARKS $36.93 Invoice 1006789210 319/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -9 -15 PARKS $71.84 Invoice 1006789210 3/9/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 3 -23 -15 PARKS $36.93 Invoice 1006812017 3123/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -23 -15 PARKS $71.84 Invoice 1006812017 3/23/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC CREDIT PARKS - $50.83 Invoice 1006539014CR 111/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES CREDIT - $71.85 PARKS Invoice 1006539014CR 1/1/2015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 .,...,.,.�..�, ,-.,.. �... �.,. Wells Fargo 10100 Total �, �.,,...., �. ��:. �„ �....,,.. �.., �... �..«.—r.. 9. a... �....,,..,... � .,,,,......e...,,......�,....� $469.62 ..,e. �....,...�k,.2 G & K SERVICES _Refer Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 3 -2 -15 CENT BLDG $59.21 Invoice 1006777828 3/2/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 3- 023 -15 LIQUOR $131.69 STORE Invoice 1006777823 3/212015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 3 -9 -15 LIQUOR STORE $96.96 I Invoice 1006789201 3/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 3 -16 -15 LIQUOR STORE $96.96 Invoice 1006800547 3/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 5 LIQUOR STORE $96.96 Invoice 1006812008 3/2312015 "827" CITY OF MOUND 04/20/1511:20 AM Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 et s;aM4a:5:�tii�,�aU�4a `" ba%w�,ustv"i;$�;t3J•'2,+„it.. , . + „�` `r: Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 3 -30 -15 LIQUOR $131.69 STORE Invoice 1006823456 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES CREDIT - $61.23 Invoice 100637092CR 1/1/2015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $552.24 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $826.41 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $208.21 601 WATER FUND $330.36 602 SEWER FUND $1,110.21 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $493.03 $2,968.22 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,968.22 Total $2,968.22 S Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,511.00 Total $3,511.00 CITY OF MOUND 04/21/1510:23 AM = Page 1 / Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Ss T vt .,.r,,Z,?a 612MV'a Batch Name FES15KENGRAV User DollarAmt $3,511.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,511.00 $0.00 in Balance Refer 3 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN _ Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SERVICES FEB $797.50 2015 Invoice 125129 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES FEB 2015 $478.50 Invoice 125129 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -300 Professional Srvs FIRE DEPT PREP & PRESENT $551.00 TECHNOLOGY POLICY TO FIREMEN LEGAL SVCS FEB 2015 Invoice 125129 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 401 - 43135 -300 Professional Srvs 2015 STREET PROJ LEGAL SVC FEB 2015 $855.50 PW15 -02 Invoice 125129 3130/2015 Project PWi502 Cash Payment G 101 -23309 XXXX FAIRFIELD - PC #14 -1 MISSION WOODS- FAIRFIELD PC 14 -16 $643.50 LEGAL SVC FEB 2015 Invoice 125129 3/30/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23306 5500 Breezy Rd Legal Escro 5500 BREEZY RD - LEGAL SVC FEB 2015 $68.00 Invoice 125129 3/30/2015 ;• Cash Payment G 101 -23318 GALWAY - VACATION PC #14 GALWAY RD- J. ROCK VACATION- PC 14 -28 $117.00 LEGAL SVCS FEB 2015 Invoice 125129 3130/2015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,511.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,104.50 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $551.00 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $855.50 $3,511.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,511.00 Total $3,511.00 _ CITY OF MOUND 04/21/159:40 AM Payments Page 1 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Batch Name 0315HOISINGT User Dollar Amt $1,531.55 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,531.55 $0.00 In Balance Refer 9 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _ Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2015 $691.30 Invoice 007 - 001 -82 4/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23327 MCES WETLAND APP L39 MCES WETLAND PLANNING SVCS MARCH $41.50 2015 Invoice 007 - 001 -82 4/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23328 5103 Windsor RD PC15 -07 S 5103 WINDSOR RD VACATION PLANNING $72.50 SVCS MARCH 2015 Invoice 007 - 001 -82 4/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23309 XXXX FAIRFIELD -PC #14 -1 FIARFIELD- MISSION WOODS PLANNING $435.75 SVCS MARCH 2015 Invoice 007- 005 -77 4/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23308 XXXX GALWAY- ROCK -PC# GALWAY RD PUV LANDS VARIANCE $20.75 PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2015 Invoice 007- 005 -77 4/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23272 SALITERMAN: #13 -04 to #1 LOST LAKE TOWNHOME & MARINA PUD $269.75 PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2015 Invoice 007 - 005 -77 4/10/2015 Transaction Date 4120/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,531.55 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,531.55 $1,531.55 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,531.55 Total $1,531.55 i � Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,454.31 Total $1,454.31 -831- CITY OF MOUND 04/23/15 1:16 PM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Batch Name UBREFND04 -15 User DollarAmt $1,454.31 Payments Computer DollarAmt $1,454.31 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ALL AMERICAN TITLE - MG Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1632 EAGLE LN- UTILITY REFUND- ALL $326.91 AMERICAN TITLE #55001253580 Invoice 042815 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $326.91 Refer 2BURNET TITLE- EDINA Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2637 CLARE LN- UTILITY REFUND- BURNET $337.93 TITLE -15- 01707 -SB Invoice 042815 4121/2015 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4743 RICHMOND RD- UTILITY REFUND- $296.80 BURNET TITLE- 15- 00258CRL Invoice 042815 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/2312015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ._,..�.,�..�p ti.ro.e, ...s..r...,.�...,_.�. $634.73 Refermm 3 LIBERTY TITLE INC. -ELK RIVER- ~ - -�� Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 6125 SUGAR MILL LN- UTILITY REFUND- $194.08 LIBERTY TITLE ELK RIVER #WZ15021130170514 Invoice 042815 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $194.08 Refer 4 TRADEMARK TITLE SVCS, INC SV _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4862 TUXEDO BLVD- UTILITY REFUND- $298.59 TRADEMARK TITLE SVG #1505135S/45 Invoice 042815 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $298.59 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 601 WATER FUND $1,454.31 —_- $1,454.31 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,454.31 Total $1,454.31 -831- CITY OF MOUND 04/21/15 2:59 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: April 2015 x „'n'Sill,;,`>4d -.. �baii, 11k .�ntxYUi"''mir,:tU",;,,x"a 'w5,".ubwTd't5S4"ik {s Batch Name NEWSPSTG0415 User Dollar Amt $943.05 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $943.05 Refer 2 POSTMASTER Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -322 Postage Invoice 042115 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/2 112 01 5 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND $0.00 In Balance POSTAGE CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER $943.05 MAY, JUNE, JULY 2015 EDITION - 8 PGS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $943.05 10100 Wells Fargo $943.05 $943.05 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $943.05 Total $943.05 -832- Refer 29 CENTERPOINTENERGY(MINNEG Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -383 Gas Utilities CITY OF MOUND 04123/15 1:15 PM Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -383 Gas Utilities Page 1 $649.50 Invoice 04282015 4110/2015 Payments Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $680.29 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 WY OF MOUND GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $1,14129 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 Current Period: April 2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities 10 P�,0,''1r,�';'67.a' Batch Name 042815CITY User Dollar Amt $146,866.84 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -383 Gas Utilities Payments Computer DollarAmt $146,866.84 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 -833- $0.00 In Balance 19 AMSAN _ _Refer _ Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -460 Janitorial Services 1 PERMANENT USE FLOOR MAT- $107.12 CENTENNIAL BLDG -CONF ROOM- SINK AREA Invoice 333837524 4/2/2015 Transaction Date 4/2112015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107.12 Refer 43 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANYT Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA ADD WIRE & HMI PROGRAMS GLEN ELYN $2,280.95 LIFT STATION ABB FLOMETER; INSTALL DISPLAYS @ ARBOR, SINCLAIR, & GRANDVIEW LS Invoice 28343 3/27/2015 Project PW1403 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,280.95 Refer µ� 28 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE, COCOA, CREAMER, FIREMEN $117.50 Invoice M6409 2/18/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE, COCOA, CREAMER, FIREMEN $75.00 Invoice M11965 4/15/2015 Transaction Date 4/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.50 Refer 27 BETZ BUILDERS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow REFUND ESCROW -2037 LAKESIDE LN- 2014- $5,000.00 00079 BETZ BUILDERS Invoice 042815 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer ,. -,..._ `37 BOYER TRUCKS Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2015 FORD F150 PARKS TRUCK $27,000.00 Invoice F52855 4/21/2015 PO 24321 Cash Payment R 101- 48500 -39101 Sales of General Fixe TRADE IN CREDIT #1004'04 FORD F150 - $6,500.00 Invoice F52855 4/21/2015 PO 24321 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -438 Licenses and Taxes TRANSIT TAX 2015 FORD F -150 $20.00 Invoice F52855 4/21/2015 PO 24321 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20,520.00 Refer 29 CENTERPOINTENERGY(MINNEG Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $649.51 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $649.50 Invoice 04282015 4110/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $680.29 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $1,14129 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $1,322.49 Invoice 04282015 4110/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 $328.54 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 -833- ,4 Yt(fM1�� CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2015 04/23/15 1:15 PM Page 2 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 2 -19 -15 TO 3 -23 -15 DEPOT BLDG $240.12 Invoice 04282015 4/10/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,011.74 Refer 44 CENTRAL HYDRAULICS, INCORPO _ _ _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts SVC STIGA SWEEPER MOTOR Invoice 005816 3/24/2015 DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREEN - STRICKLEN Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 38 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR� Refer Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts CYLINDER REQUALIFICATION CHG- DEPOSIT Invoice 00002695 3/31/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 41 EVERLAS_TENTERPRISES INC. Cash Payment Cash Payment Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow REFUND ESCROW -5790 BARTLETT BLVD DOCK PROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD #2013 -00812 EVERLAST ENTERPRISES Invoice 042815 4/22/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 20 FINANCE AND COMMERCE _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -351 Legal Notices Publishing ADV FORBIDS 2015 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PIN 15 -04 Invoice 742122219 Transaction Date Refer ..�..�� -. 4/13/2015 4/21/2015 1 FIRSTLAB Project PW 1504 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -305 Medical Services DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREEN- KRESS Invoice FL00118359 4110/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total �,,,. �.. �.o...,..M.- .,,-- ... ,- .,.,.„l. -1—,. Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -305 Medical Services DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREEN - STRICKLEN Invoice FL00118359 4/10/2015 R 281 - 45210 -34737 Villa Slip Revenue Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 21 GILLESPIE CENTER _ Cash Payment E602-49450-433 Dues and Subscriptions WATER & COOKIES- MCES PROJECT OPEN HOUSE 4 -9 -15 @ GILLESPIE CTR Invoice 042815 4/1712015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 n.--.,.. Wells Fargo 10100 Total �,,,. �.. �.o...,..M.- .,,-- ... ,- .,.,.„l. -1—,. Refer - _",. -..-_ 3 GOOD, GAIL •, -s.. .m,.......... . a. ,..,,..- -». ' -. Cash Payment R 281 - 45210 -34737 Villa Slip Revenue REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG DOCK PROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Cash Payment G 281 -22823 Shoreline /Dock Maint Escrow REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG DOCK PROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Cash Payment G 281 -22822 Channel Maintenance Escro REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG DOCK PROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Cash Payment G 281 -22821 Slip Maintenance Escrow REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG DOCK PROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Cash Payment R 281 - 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG DOCK PROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 -834- $711.42 $711.42 $350.00 $350.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $187.41 $187.41 $25.00 $42.95 $67.95 $70.00 $70.00 $1,602.00 $132.00 $132.00 $84.00 $18.75 CITY OF MOUND 04/23/15 1:15 PM Page 3 Payments - CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 .... ,. ,tw.. &Ii�VN .•,,?"�,ut'l"5.. 3n�`�'a�t ,?Y,M..'.Al�.� ":dk, Cash Payment R 281- 45210 -34725 Dock Permits REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG - $325.00 DOCK FROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4117/2015 Cash Payment R 281- 45210 -34705 LMCD Fees REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG - $11.25 DOCK FROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits REFUND- MOVED FROM LL SLIP TO REG $50.00 DOCK PROG TW- 038 -1- G. GOOD Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Transaction Date 4/2012015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ��.. .w.,.�,n.,,�,.».........,....a, ,,.�,�.,,.,M. .�,......_.. $1,682.50 .,..A.w..... Refer. 2GOVDELIVERY. .� ... .... ....... Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -440 Other Contractual Servic EMAIL SUBSCRIPTION MGMT SYSTEM $2,300.00 ANNUAL HOSTING & MTCE FEE GOV DELIVERY COMMUNICATIONS 6 -13 -15 THRU 6 -12 -16 Invoice 4083 4/14/2015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,300.00 Refer 30 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -331 Use of personal auto REIMB MILEAGE MTG EXCELSIOR 4 -8 -15 $8.05 BRIGGS & MORGAN LUNCH- K. HANSON APRIL 2015 bi Invoice 042815 4122/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells REIMB DSL INTERNET HOME LINE- K. $47.50 HANSON 4 -16 TO 5 -15 2015 Invoice 042815 4/22/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -305 Medical Services EYEWEAR/ EXAM REIMB BENEFIT- K. $50.00 HANSON 3 -2 -15 Invoice 042815 4/22/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.55 Refer 4 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER _ Cash Payment G 101 -23309 XXXX FAIRFIELD - PC #14 -1 MAILING LABELS FAIRFIELD- MISSION $68.75 WOODS 12 -26 -14 PC 14, 15 & 16 Invoice 042815 4/1612015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68.75 Refer 36 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Cash Payment E 22242260 -434 Conference & Training MAYDAY FOR MENTAL HEALTH CLASS -T. $25.00 MYERS Invoice 00332194 4/8/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.00 - �....�. Refer 4 HOME DEPOT /GECF (PA49� , Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies PARKSHOP- LAUNDRY TUB, TRAP, $357.54 WASHER, FRAME NAIL, NUTS, TAILPIECE Invoice 3023667 2/20/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies PARKSHOP- LIGHTS, SWITCH, BULBS, VAC $130.94 FLTR, GFCI ELECTRIC BOX WALL PLATE$ Invoice 6014042 2/27/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -221 Equipment Parts WATER- OUTLET BOX $54.10 Invoice 6185525 2/27/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies PARKSHOP- VANITY, REDWOOD PANEL $42109 SHEETING Invoice 4260444 3/11/2015 -835- Payments CITY OF MOUND 04/23/15 1:15 PM Page 4 Current Period: April 2015 17 ., a,'...Ilww?Y:m Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies PARKSHOP- SHEATHING, TOILET, SEAL, $284.48 WAX RING Invoice 9260493 3/16/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies PARKSHOP- RETURN VANITY Invoice 9174067 3/11/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies PARKSHOP- WHIT VANITY TOP W/ WHITE BOWL Invoice 7015386 417/2015 Transaction Date 4/2012015 Wells Fargo 10100 a � Refer_ -5 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COMM OVERAGE - 3/14/15 TO 4/13/15 , Cash Payment E 101- 49840 -300 Professional Srvs 1ST QTR 2015 PEG ACCESS FEE PER Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying SUBSCRIBER Invoice 042815 4/8/2015 OVERAGE CHG 3 -10 -15 TO 4 -9 -15 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer �. 6 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPO� Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 -COLOR Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -202 Duplicating and copying OVERAGE - 3/14/15 TO 4/13/15 Total Total Invoice 1959680 4/812015 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 -COLOR OVERAGE - 3/14/15 TO 4/13/15 Invoice 1959680 4/8/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 PIN COPIER OVERAGE CHG 3 -10 -15 TO 4 -9 -15 Invoice 1955218 4/1/2015 Project 15 -3 Transaction Date 4/16/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 31 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPO��- Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &I COPIER 6 & WHT COPIES 1 -20 -15 THRU 4- 19-15 Invoice 1960613 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA HP3035 FINANCE /P &I COPIER B & WHT COPIES 1 -20 -15 THRU 4- 19-15 Invoice 1960613 4/9/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Due 12/31/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - -- Reefer a. 7 MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSON, L Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES - MARCH Invoice 042815 4/1/2015 _ Transaction Date 4120/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 32 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -470 Water Samples Invoice 750129 4/14/2015 Transaction Date 4/2212015 Refer 23 MINUTEMAN PRESS Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -203 Printed Forms Invoice 17127 4115/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -203 Printed Forms Invoice 17149 4/22/2015 MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM WATER TESTS -10 Wells Fargo 10100 Total BUSINESS CARDS- R. GUST- HWS BUSINESS CARDS- E. HOVERSTEW PUB WKS DIR -836- Project 15 -5 - $49.00 $78.00 $1,279.15 $11,342.52 $11,342.52 $34.34 $123.73 $4.94 $163.01 $78.34 $117.51 $195.85 $145.20 $145.20 $77.50 $77.50 $48.27 $44.50 CITY OF M0UND 04/23/1511:20 AM Page 5 Payments Ct'TY _1- CSF i[�0UN€3 Current Period: April 2015 Invoice 0415075 -R 4/1/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 0415075 -R 4/1/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 0415075 -R 41112015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Refer 25 MOUND FARMERS MARKET & MO Cash Payment R 101 -42000 -32172 Public Gathering Per JANITORIAL SVC- MARCH 2015- PUBLIC WORKS BLDG Project 15 -3 JANITORIAL SVC- MARCH 2015- FIRE DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Total MUSIC PERMIT REFUND- MOUND FARMERS' MARKET & MORE Invoice 042815 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo Refer 35 MOUND FIRE RELIEFASSOCIATIO� -� Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib 10100 APRIL 2015 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION CONTRIBUTION Invoice 042815 5/1/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer __22 MP &G MARKETING SOLUTIONS, L_- ...�.».,.,�� - -� Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -203 Printed Forms DEVELOPER MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS PIECE -200 $163.47 $245.20 $980.80 $50.00 Total $50.00 $10,416.67 Total $10,416.67 $1,026.00 Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 8 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASS _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -208 Instructional Supplies NFPA 1901: STANDARD FOR AUTOMOTIVE FIRE APPARATUS Invoice 30151 3/24/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41110 -200 Office Supplies BUSINESS CARDS- M. WEGSCHEID- MAYOR $44.50 invoice 17149 4/22/2015 NEWMAN SIGNS Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $137.27 Refer a� 24 MN CLEAN SERVICES, INC. 3131/2015 PO 24530 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services JANITORIAL SVC- MARCH 2015- CITY HALL $245.20 Invoice 0415075 -R 4/1/2015 47 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY,/ Cash. Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services JANITORIAL SVC- MARCH 2015- $326.93 Invoice 901352338 3/27/2015 PO24533 CENTENNIAL BLDG Project 15 -4 Invoice 0415075 -R 4/1/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 0415075 -R 4/1/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 0415075 -R 41112015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Refer 25 MOUND FARMERS MARKET & MO Cash Payment R 101 -42000 -32172 Public Gathering Per JANITORIAL SVC- MARCH 2015- PUBLIC WORKS BLDG Project 15 -3 JANITORIAL SVC- MARCH 2015- FIRE DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Total MUSIC PERMIT REFUND- MOUND FARMERS' MARKET & MORE Invoice 042815 4/21/2015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo Refer 35 MOUND FIRE RELIEFASSOCIATIO� -� Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib 10100 APRIL 2015 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION CONTRIBUTION Invoice 042815 5/1/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer __22 MP &G MARKETING SOLUTIONS, L_- ...�.».,.,�� - -� Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -203 Printed Forms DEVELOPER MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS PIECE -200 $163.47 $245.20 $980.80 $50.00 Total $50.00 $10,416.67 Total $10,416.67 $1,026.00 Invoice 042815 4/17/2015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 8 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASS _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -208 Instructional Supplies NFPA 1901: STANDARD FOR AUTOMOTIVE FIRE APPARATUS Invoice 30151 3/24/2015 Transaction Date 4/16/2015 . w..,,,.. M,....,. �, �_. Wells Fargo 10100 �. ....,F.- �.....�.«........,a:,. ........,.,,,.�.�, Total ..,..�.�,a.�,.:.,, Refer- ....__... ..46 NEWMAN SIGNS Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials TRAFFIC CONES Invoice TI0284044 3131/2015 PO 24530 _ Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 47 NORTHERN SAFETY COMPANY,/ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms SAFETY- HARDHATS -18 Invoice 901352338 3/27/2015 PO24533 Project 15 -4 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 ��- �� -�� Total ��- q -�� Refer 45 N_S /1 MECHANICAL CONTRACTING,_ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance INSTALL NEW BURNER IGNITION CONTROL ON BOILER #1 3 -26 -15 Invoice W34269 4/9/2015 -837- Y i,u<o.uu $62.15 $62.15 $370.40 $370.40 $220,56 $220.56 $604.65 CITY OF MOUND 04/23/1511:20 AM - -��„ Page 6 Payments OF -MOUND, Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Refer 33 OFFICE DEPOT Current Period: April 2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $604.65 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER, COUNTERFEIT PENS, $135.72 LAMINATING POUCHES- HWS Invoice 764810359001 4/9/2015 PO 23463 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $135.72 Refer ...._b_ 11-11--l- 9 ORONO CITY OF ° ,...__.,,. 1 _., �,..,..>., m...-.,,. w. �...._......_,,.-. n,......»... m�, �...,. ..,..�...,..,.____.,."......m„. _ Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -450 Board of Prisoners HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM $25.00 FEES Invoice 20140376 4/1312015 Transaction Date 4/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $25.00 Refer ,.. 10 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts CHAIN SAW AIR FILTER- PARTS- PARKS $145.22 Invoice P27969 3/18/2015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $145.22 11 SOUTHWEST TRAILS ASSOCIATIO _Refer _ Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow SW TRAILS ASSOC 2015 DNR PMT #2 3 -17- $7,755.97 15 Invoice 042815 4/13/2015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,755.97 Refer 12 STA -SAFE LOCKSMITHS COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply KEYS -3 CITY HALL $16.50 Invoice 00020103 2/19/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply KEYS FOR 2007 DODGE DAKOTA- STREETS $110.00 DEPTTRUCK Invoice 00020099 2/11/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply KEYS -3 CITY HALL $16.50 Invoice 00020138 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply KEYS -3 CENT BLDG $10.50 Invoice 00020138 3/3012015 Transaction Date 4121/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.50 Refer 17 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -328 Employment Advertising HELP WANTED- HWS SALESCLERK AD- 3- $111.00 28 -15 Invoice 202694 3/29/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising READERS CHOICE AWARD AD 4 -4 -15 $336.00 Invoice 204712 4/5/2015 Transaction Date 4/1812015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $447.00 Refer 26 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -328 Employment Advertising HELP WANTED - SEASONAL PARKS MTCE $50.00 AD 3 -12 -15 Invoice 198764 3/1512015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -328 Employment Advertising HELP WANTED - SEASONAL PARKS MTCE $92.50 AD 3 -12 -15 Invoice 36261 3/21/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -328 Employment Advertising HELP WANTED- SEASONAL PARKS MTCE $92.50 AD 3 -12 -15 Invoice 36261- 198764 3/28/2015 _838_ CITY OF MOUND 04/23/1511:20 AM Page 7 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 F a25.,",'i', Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $235.00 Refer- - -� - 18 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER-CITY Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE -AMEND DOCK 7 WATERWAYS ORD- 4 -04 -15 Invoice 203876 4/412015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL- ADV FOR BIDS 2015 LIFT STATION IMRPOV PROJ PW15 -04 4 -11 -15 Invoice 206321 4/11/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23272 SALITERMAN: #13 -04 to #1 PUB HEARING NTCE- CUP APP AMEND LOST LAKE LANDINGS DEVELOP- 4 -11 -15 Invoice 206322 4/11/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSH NTCE 4 -18 -15 Invoice 210694 4/18/2015 Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 13 UHL COMPANY Total Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT - CITY HALL 2ND QTR 2015 Invoice 34552 4/1/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -402 Building Maintenance PREVENTATIVE MTCE CONTRACT- FIRE DEPT 2ND QTR 2015 Invoice 34552 4/1/2015 Transaction Date Transaction Date 4/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 48 ULINE _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms COVERALLS, SAFETY GLASSES- PUB WKS Invoice 66363289 3/30/2015 39 VERIZON WIRELESS Transaction Date 4/2312015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 34 US HEALTH WORKS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -305 Medical Services PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL - G. BALL FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 3 -11 -15 PARKS Invoice 0043156 4/10/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 � - - Refer - 49 USA BLUEBOOK 11111111 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 584245 3/6/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Refer �. 39 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells 'i Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 $188.90 $126.16 $42.41 $117.50 $474.97 $546.87 $546.88 $1,093.75 $254.80 $254.80 $254.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $254.00 3 MSA V -GARD CAPS- GREEN SEWER DEPT $89.85 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $89.85 SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 3 -11- $35.01 15 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON $35.01 DATACARD SVC 3 -11 -15 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Project 15 -3 PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC $35.01 3 -11 -15 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Project 15 -3 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 3 -11 -15 $17.51 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM a Refer 42 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment CITY OF MOUND 04/23/1511:20 AM $3,965.00 Page 8 /l Payments 3130/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN @ 1729 DOVE UN 3 -04- C'tTY OF MOUND 15 Current Period: April 2015 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -321 Telephone & Cells FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 3 -11 -15 $17.50 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY $51.94 OFFICER 3 -11 -15 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 BURST 3 -12 -15 INSTALL NEW WATERLINE Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #39 RESCUE $35.01 UTILITY 3 -11 -15 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #40 3 -11 -15 $35.01 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Invoice 9743735704 4/1012015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 3 -11 -15 $35.01 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells WATER TRUCK #315 J. STEWART $35.01 DATACARD SVC 3 -11 -15 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells WATER TRUCK #512 L. GIESE DATACARD $35.01 SVC 3 -11 -15 THRU 4 -10 -2015 BILL SUM Invoice 9743735704 4/10/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $367.03 Refer 14 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE _ Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE @ 2100 HILLCREST 3 -17 -15 $284.50 Invoice 5940 4/7/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE @ 3170 WESTEDGE BLVD 3- $284.50 17 -15 Invoice 5940 4/7/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE @ 5300 SHORELINE 3 -25 -15 $415.25 Invoice 5940 4/7/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE @ 5300 SHORELINE 3 -26 -15 $284.50 Invoice 5940 417/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE @ 1729 DOVE LN 3 -4 -15 $296.00 Invoice 5940 4/7/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LEAK LOCATE @ 5932 IDLEWOOD 3 -6 -15 $419.00 Invoice 5940 4/7/2015 Transaction Date 2/3/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,983.75 Refer 42 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN @ 5932 IDLEWOOD 3- $3,965.00 06 -15 Invoice 3949 3130/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN @ 1729 DOVE UN 3 -04- $4,457.50 15 Invoice 3950 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN @ 2100 CLOVER $2,475.00 CIRCLE 3 -17 -15 Invoice 3953 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic NORTHERN RD- DUG FOR EXISTING $23,085.00 CASING, INSTALL VALVE 3- 10 -15; PIPE BURST 3 -12 -15 INSTALL NEW WATERLINE Invoice 3954 3/30/2015 -840- _ CITY OF MOUND 04/23/1511:20 AM --- Page 9 i \ Payments 61T'Y OF MOUND " Current Period: April 2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR WATERMAIN @ 3170 WESTEDGE 3- $4,786.00 17 -15 Invoice 3955 3/30/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic HAULED OUT FROZEN DIRT FROM $2,226.00 WATERMAIN BREAK 2 -24 -15 Invoice 3956 3/30/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 .__._ -.�. .. ,. Wells Fargo 10100 Total a-._ �e.,,......,.... �,.... . d... �,,,,,. ...,_..... .......e.N..,.......«,..- .....� ,,.. ...:�.....,..e,.......�..,.,,.. $40,994.50 Refer...,.,..,... 15 XCEL ENERGY. Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC 3 -03 -15 THRU 4 -2 -15 $5,019.06 MAYWOOD STREET LIGHTS Invoice 451577949 4/3/2015 Transaction Date 4/18/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,019.06 Refer 40 XCEL ENERGY _ Gash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2/26/15 TO 3/25115 $123.08 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2/26/15 TO 3/25/15 DEPOT $50.03 BLDG Invoice 452687484 4113/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2/26/15 TO 3/25/15 $2,984.84 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 ,I Cash Payment E101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC- 2126/15 TO 3/25/15 $1,723.04 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2126/15 TO 3/25115 $3,476.41 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2/26/15 TO 3/25/15 $1,156.58 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2/26/15 TO 3/25/15 $1,386.17 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2/26/15 TO 3/25/15 $1,386.17 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2126/15 TO 3/25/15 $640.82 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2126/15 TO 3/25/15 $2,086.13 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 2/26/15 TO 3/25/15 $41.60 Invoice 452687484 4/13/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,054.87 Refer � 16 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MEDICAL SUPPLIES -PARKS DEPT- $88.90 ANTISEPTIC & BURN SPRAY, BANDAIDS, WOUND SEAL, CLEAN WIPES Invoice 54106826 4116/2015 Transaction Date 4/1812015 -��.�� Wells Fargo 10100 Total $88.90 Refer :--- �.50ZIEGLER, INCORPORATED-- Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic SVC GENERATORS 6139 EVERGREEN RD- $1,541.33 REPAIR COOLANT LEAK, CLEANED RADIATOR, INSTALL FAN GUARD - SVC CHATEAU LN - NEW BATTERY Invoice SWO50233629 3/26/2015 Transaction Date 4/23/2015 Wells 1. Fert j 10100 Total $1 5 41.33 CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 285 MOUND HRA 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: April 2015 10100 Wells Fargo $71,128.90 $13,681.04 $1,871.40 $2,086.13 $48,340.11 $7,643.15 $2,116.11 $146,866.84 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $146,866.84 Total $146,866.84 04123/15 11:20 AM Page 10 CITY OF MOUND 04/23/1511: 27 AM i Page 1 Payments C &TY OF MOUND -a Batch Name 042815HWS Payments Current Period: April 2015 User Dollar Amt Computer Dollar Amt $65,220.04 $65,220.04 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ AP Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438510302 4/13/2015 Invoice 47796500 4/13/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Due 12/31/2014 Accounts Payable Refer 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY_ Invoice 47796500 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 3026244 4/9/2015 5 BELLBOY CORPORA TION Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION Invoice 91879800 4/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 47899200 4/2012015 Invoice 91856700 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 47827300 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 47827300 4/15/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 ,. Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale 20200 $135.40 Total $135.40 $788.10 10100 Total $788.10 $4,435.90 $683.45 $14.35 10100 Total $5,133.70 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $51.00 Invoice 91844500 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $229.85 Invoice 47796500 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,116.08 Invoice 47796500 4/13/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,396.93 5 BELLBOY CORPORA TION _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $67.10 Invoice 91879800 4/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- CORKSCREW, PLASTIC FLASKS $42.60 Invoice 91856700 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- CORKSCREW, SHAKER SET, SHOT $153.00 GLASSES Invoice 91879800 4/20/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $262.70 Refer 6 BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPA Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $303.50 Invoice 3588 4/9/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $303.50 Refer 7 CARLOS CREEK WINERY _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $312.00 > Invoice 11205 4/15/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $312.00 Refer 8 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST -TI CITY OF MOUND 04/23/1511:27 AM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $142.16 Invoice 0188056812 4/14/2015 Transaction Date 4/2212015 Wells Faro 10100 Total $142.16 Refer 9 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY - Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,050.90 Invoice 798439 4/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $30.00 Invoice 798492 4/14/2015 Transaction Date 4/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,080.90 Refer 10 EXTREME BEVERAGE _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $202,40 Invoice 1160065 4/9/2015 _ Transaction Date- 4122/2015 R rv4 mm ,,, ,^ H Wells Fargo y.Rmm- 10100 Total $202.40 Refer a 11 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,145.50 Invoice 757331 4/15/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10 100 Total $1,145.50 _ -,- Refer 12 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,351.70 Invoice 2346717 4/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rese MIX $38.80 Invoice 2346718 4/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $216.00 Invoice 2346720 4/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $93.00 Invoice 2328608 4/8/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,513.50 Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,168.54 Invoice 5133858 4/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,406.20 Invoice 5133859 4/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale BEER $21.99 Invoice 5133860 4/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $19.44 Invoice 519907 3/27/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $12.41 Invoice 519906 3/27/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $18.00 Invoice 519905 3/27/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,546.88 Refer 13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $36.00 Invoice 5139095 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,859.44 Invoice 5139092 4/15/2015 -844- CITY OF (MOUND 04/23/15 11:27 AM Page 3 Payments C6TY OF MOUND "- Current Period: April 2015 to A�9Y�s4wkt. t' S(` Hill43 `':hx117ITia�>?.rt::.F.ah'u zS`GTO Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,947.55 Invoice 5139093 411512015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.99 Invoice 5139094 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $12.41 Invoice 520758 4/3/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 .�.�..�..,...,. ._,_,.,...„.„,.,.., Total M,..,,.. .�.,._,..a..�.,�..,...�.,.�.�,. $7,852.57 Refer 15 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 4 -02 -15 $266.80 Invoice 30669 4/212015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 4 -06 -15 $42.05 Invoice 30677 4/6/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 4 -09 -15 $279.85 Invoice 30696 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 4 -13 -15 $50.75 Invoice 30703 4/13/2015 _ Transaction Date 4122/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $639.45 Refer 16 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 3 -09 -15 $65.19 Invoice 928037125 3/29/2015 _ Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65.19 Refer 17 MINNESTALGIA WINERY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $270.00 Invoice 4412 4/7/2015 Transaction Date 4/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ............. .a $270.00 «~ 19 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $853.04 Invoice 8494460 4/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $13.75 Invoice 8494460 4/13/2015 Transaction Date 4122/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $866.79 Refer 20 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INCM Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $949.80 Invoice 2769714 4/812015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,638.00 Invoice 2769713 4/8/2015 Gash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $56.00 Invoice 2769715 4/8/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,643.80 Refer 21 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC�_- Cash Payment Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $552.35 Invoice 2773254 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $409.75 Invoice 2773254 4/15/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $962.10 Refer 22 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, IN - -845- CITY OF MOUND 04/23/1511:27 AM �-" - --' Page 4 r \`\ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 z.,,, :, „.,,)";1rt,b, SP&,,=AT, , ",S&t% M%3 tilt'u.:w".."u ,,aa' -piI a:�.....�u1 »: =,,. .. Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 4 -30 -15 $15.00 EDITION Invoice SO449422 3/24/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer _ 23 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,078.00 Invoice 1272816 4/912015 Cash Payment E 60949750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,479.49 Invoice 1272817 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $40.00 Invoice 1272818 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,865.00 Invoice 1275134 4/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $562.05 Invoice 1275133 4/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$4.50 Invoice 9054595 4/6/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,020.04 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ _Refer _2_4 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $27.12 Invoice 887379 4/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,989.44 Invoice 887379 4/14/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,016.56 Refer ,.25 TKO WINES, INC. Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $432.00 Invoice 1094 4/16/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $432.00 Refer 27 TRADITION WINE & SPIRITS, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $309.00 Invoice 5459 4/10/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $4.00 Invoice 5459 4/10/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $313.00 Refer 26 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED - Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $248.00 Invoice 0121826 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0121826 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $80.00 Invoice 0121827 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0121827 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $196.00 Invoice 0121825 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0121825 4/9/2015 -846- CITY OF MOUND 04/23/151L27 AM Page 5 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: April 2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $534.00 Refer 28 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $637.33 Invoice 389714 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $11.55 Invoice 389714 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $570.00 Invoice 390314 4/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $9.90 Invoice 390314 4/16/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,228.78 29 WINE MERCHANTS _ _Refer _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,064.00 Invoice 7025229 4/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $46.00 Invoice 7025230 4/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,415.00 Invoice 7026204 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $82.00 +i Invoice 702165 3/2712015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,443.00 Refer 30 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $205.20 Invoice 1090389085 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,135.95 Invoice 1090389084 4/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $8,183.23 Invoice 1090385539 4/8/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,524.38 31 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRI _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $308.00 Invoice 1080308947 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,923.17 Invoice 108030896 4/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $312.00 Invoice 1080311894 4/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $886.54 Invoice 1080311833 4/16/2015 Transaction Date 4/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,429.71 I UTY OF MOUND Payments 04/23/15 11:27 AM Page 6 Current Period: April 2015 a , >...w:.«�,ikw..`'•"w'',4'S'.'. ,s "iw`�"b"v'aau,"w^.d auWwS "a.+0 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $65,084.64 $65,084.64 20200 Accounts Payable 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $135.40 $135.40 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $65,220.04 Total $65,220.04 -T,: MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES March 24, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, March 24, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Heidi Gesch, Ray Salazar, Kelli Gillispie, and Jennifer Peterson Members absent: None. Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Attorney Melissa Manderschied, Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Director of Financeffreasurer /Clerk Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Jeanne Brustad, Rachel Hintzman, Katie Morford, Laura Mattioli, Justin Rock, Sandra Rock, Jay Rock, Kathryn Leach, Alan Leach, Brian Nelson, Kevin Ehlinger, Cory Muller, Lucas Henriksen, Carolyn Brooks, Max Avalon, Matt Van Nelson, Jordan Korczak, Mark Hanus, Jacob Stewart Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Gillispie requested item 4F be pulled for discussion. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consentagenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $216,710.74 B. Approve minutes: March 10, 2015 regular meeting C. Approve Payment of Invoice from Haugo Geo Technical Services, LLC, in the amount of $18,970, for the Proposed Island Watermain Loop Project, City Project No. PW -15 -10 D. Approve Special Meeting for Emergency Response Training: Apr 28, 6:OOpm (Council Chambers) Mound City Council Minutes — March 24, 2015 E. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -19: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT FOR 2015 WHEELS 4 MEALS SPECIAL EVENT AND APPROVING A REDUCED FEE DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF THE GATHERING F. Pulled 4F. Adopt Resolution Approving Public Lands Permit for tree planting in the Harbor District Gillispie stated she asked for this item to be pulled because she wanted to confirm the number of trees and clarification of whose responsibility it is to remove the trees. Smith stated a cooperative agreement is being developed and will make the Rotary responsible for removal. Gillispie requested number 4 be added to the resolution on page 543 stating that the responsibility for removal and /or transplanting, if required, will be that of the applicant. MOTION by Gillispie, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following resolution as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -20: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR TREE PLANTING IN THE HARBOR DISTRICT 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None. 6. Visit by Jeanne Brustad, representing The Gillespie Center Jeanne Brustad, 3309 Casco Circle, Orono, highlighted the benefits of senior centers and thanked the City of Mound for their support. Brustad highlighted special events including day trips, community involvement, and activities at the center. A survey of participants was conducted and new activities are being added as a result. Brustad also highlighted fundraising efforts. Brustad said contributing cities have been invited to a special meeting on April 30th to take an in -depth look at the finances and the strategic plan. Mayor Wegscheid thanked Brustad for the great service the Gillespie Center provides. Hanson highlighted that it is much more than a senior center as it serves all ages. 7. Sarah Smiths Community Development Director, requesting discussion on MCES L -31 Smith summarized the proposal and stated that Chris Remis from the Met Council is in attendance. Met Council has worked with City Staff over the past several months on the location of a new lift station that would be on a city owned parcel located on the northwest corner of Bradford Lane and Wilshire Boulevard. The parcel was conveyed to the City years ago either through tax forfeit or state conveyance. Staff believes the City has the ability to grant an easement or convey the land. Mound City Council Minutes —March 24, 2015 Smith said title work is necessary and that the Met Council has to decide whether to pursue acquisition or easement. Since the parcel has wetland characteristics, permits will need to be obtained from other agencies. Smith stated a meeting has already taken place with the DNR and Hennepin County and that the timeline assumes fall construction. Smith stated that Staff feels these improvements are very important. In cooperation with MCES, a neighborhood meeting will be held at the Gillispie Center on Thursday, April 9th at 7:00 pm. Smith recommended any fees incurred be paid for by MCES since it is their project. Smith said Staff is requesting the City Council authorize further research and any applications that are necessary related to the City land. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to direct staff to proceed with the research and do the title work. All voted in favor. Motion carried. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, authorizing any applications related to the project be submitted. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Hanson invited Chris Remis to come forward and introduce himself and the project. Chris Remis said the Met Council is willing to pay for the preliminary work. Remis said notices are being sent to neighbors in the Wilshire and Bradford Lane neighborhood informing them of the project and a meeting to be held at the Gillespie Center. Hanson said the meeting will also be published in the Laker and all are welcome. Hanson said the open house will be held on April 9th beginning at 7pm. 8. Planning Commission Recommendation(s): A. Consideration of the Mission Woods Applications from Kent Friedrichsen to plat three properties and construct public improvements in the vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road Smith summarized what took place at the March 10th council meeting and what actions will be necessary by the Council in relation to the preliminary plat. Smith clarified the public hearing was only for the preliminary plat portion. Smith summarized concerns received in letters from 4 neighboring property owners, including the amount of tree clearing, proposed lot sizes and questions on how the tax forfeit parcels were sold by Hennepin County. Smith gave a summary of additional information that has been obtained since the March 10th meeting. Smith stated that each lot is over the minimum of 6,000 square feet and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan that calls for low density in the area. Smith said the review is being conducted as a major subdivision process, even though it is only 3 lots, because the proposed plan has road and infrastructure improvements that will be maintained by City of Mound. Smith noted that continuation of the public hearing does not require re- noticing. Smith summarized the disposition of the tax forfeiture parcels and stated that in 2013 the City Council recommended 0079 be combined with 0086 and offered to adjacent property owners. Adjacent owners means a parcel that physically touches the parcel to be sold and can't be separated by a road or alley. Hennepin County said it is up to the City to recommend to sell but the county auditor ultimately determines how it will be offered and conveyed. Smith stated that as a courtesy the letter writers were noticed of the continuance of the public hearing. Smith said not all materials were republished for the packet and that some additional information was added. -851- Mound City Council Minutes — March 24, 2015 Public Hearing to consider Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat for proposed Mission Woods located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road (PC Case 14 -15) - continued from March 10, 2015 meeting. Mayor Wegscheid reopened the public hearing at 7:40pm. City Attorney requested that the letters received to date be added to the official record. Upon no further comment, Mayor Wegscheid closed the public hearing at 7:41 pm. 2. Consideration of Subdivision Exemption, Zoning Variance, Subdivision Variance, and Final Plat of property located in the vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road, PC Case 14 -16 and 15 -03 Requested Actions: a. MOTION by Gesch, second by Peterson, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -21: Resolution Approving the Subdivision Exemption of the Property Located at 5713 Fairfield Road Case No. 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 b. MOTION by Gesch, second by Salazar, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -22: Resolution Approving the Major Subdivision - Preliminary Plat for the Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road Case No. 14-15,14- 16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23 -117 -24-42 -0079 and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 c. MOTION by Gesch, second by Salazar, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -23: Resolution Approving a Zoning Variance for Lot Depth of Parcel 3 for the Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road Case No. 14 -15, 14- 16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117 -24-42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 d. MOTION by Gesch, second by Salazar, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -24: Resolution Approving a Subdivision Variance for the Street Design Right -of -Way and Cul -de -sac Standards for the Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road Case No. 14-15,14-16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117 -24-42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 and 23- 117 -24 -42 -0120 -852- Mound City Council Minutes — March 24, 2015 e. MOTION by Gesch, second by Salazar, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -25: Resolution Approving the Major Subdivision -Final Plat for the Property Located in the Vicinity of Meadow Lane and Fairfield Road Case No. 14-15,14-16 and 15 -03 PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080, 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 and 23- 117- 24 -42- 0120 S. Public Hearing to consider vacation application for unimproved portion of Galway Lane that abuts properties located at 4730 Galway Road and 2640 Shannon Lane (Case No. 14 -28) Applicants: Justin Rock and Cory and Linda Muller Smith gave an overview of the requested vacation application for an unimproved portion of Galway Lane. Smith stated MSS 412.851 outlines the procedures for consideration of a vacation application, including a public hearing, publication twice and notice to affected property owners located in the Seton plats and the non - abutting dock holders in the Excelsior Commons. Smith also sent a notice to the DNR as required due to the parcel leading to public water. Smith stated a DNR representative is in the audience. Smith said Staff recommends denial because the legal standard for vacation is not being met. The standard is that it must appear to be in the public interest to vacate. Smith stated staff believes the variance approvals and public lands permit that were granted in 2014 satisfactorily allows the applicant to develop their lot. Smith clarified that the application was for a vacation for the entire road and not a portion. Mayor Wegscheid opened the Public Hearing at 8:02 p.m. Rachel Hintzman, Area Supervisor for the DNR, said they look for three things: whether proposed vacation has public benefits, impact on access to public water, and impact on water and conservation. Hintzman stated the proximity to other access points does not negate the importance of preserving all access points. Hintzman stated that the DNR does not believe the proposed vacation is in public interest. Justin Rock, 4730 Galway Road /applicant, said he was not aware of vacation option until after the initial variances were granted. Rock said the biggest concern is the access and suggested a perpetual easement would be sufficient. Rock said there are no utilities in the area. Rock suggested that the other access points are sufficient to access the commons. Rock said the vacation would eliminate the need for variances /public lands permit and would make the lot more conforming. Rock says there is a lot of additional work involved with a public lands permit and that grading will be needed due to the additional slope. Rock stated he is trying to find a compromise by offering a perpetual easement. Mark Hanus, 4446 Denbigh, said he raised the option of a vacation when he was the mayor because he felt it was the best option and still believes that. Hanus said the DNR input was not required per MSS statute in this instance. Hanus said based upon the City Code, this is a corner lot and is required to have frontage on an improved public street. Hanus said he is raising the issue because it is not clear cut and is very complicated. Hanus believes easement options are a possible solution and that it is far more desirable for the City to have fewer variances, frontage on a public street, and property back on the tax rolls. Hanus suggested it -853- Mound City Council Minutes —March 24, 2015 could be done in such a way that there is no loss to public use in any way that they are currently using it. Alan Leach, 2645 Shannon Lane, stated that he has lived directly across the street from Galway Lane for over 30 years and wanted to discuss whether the other access points are really options. Leach said the middle access point is too steep to transport gas and coolers that the Cavan access is marshy. Leach said most non - abutters use the Galway Lane access due to firmness and slope and that it will become a problem if City releases ownership to appease one or two property owners. Mayor Wegscheid closed the public hearing at 8:21 pm. Mayor Wegscheid questioned what precedent would be set at all similar public access points around the lake if the vacation were approved. Requested Action MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -26: Resolution Denying a Street Vacation Application for Unimproved Portion of Galway Lane abutting the Properties at 4730 Galway Road and 2640 Shannon Lane (Case No. 14 -28) 9. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, requesting action related to the Dock Program A. Action on Dock Location Map Addendum for 2015 Pausche described the history of the spacing of docks in the Excelsior Commons and requested a change due to the curvature of the shoreline in orderto reduce the overlap of the dock use area for site 08994. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the Dock Location Map Addendum for 2015. All voted in favor. Motion carried. B. Action on an ordinance amending Chapter 78 of the Mound City Code Pausche requested that any due dates associated with the application process be changed from May to March 15th in order to make the process more efficient. In addition, Pausche requested that abutters who sell not be entitled to a refund and clarification of prohibited activities on city -owned docks and commons. Mayor Wegscheid questioned the times for no overnight parking. Discussion ensued and it was agreed to change the hours to 12:00 am - 5:00 am on weekdays and 1:00 am - 5:00 am on weekends for no overnight parking and a maximum of 8 hours at any one time. Gillispie noted that she and the Docks Commission struggled with the same issues. MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following ordinance as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mound City Council Minutes — March 24, 2015 ORDINANCE NO. 02- 2015: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 78 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO WATERWAYS C. Action on a New Multiple Dock (Minor Change) Application for the LMCD Mayor Wegscheid recused himself due to a potential conflict of interest. Pausche stated a request was made to install permanent pilings at the Lost Lake docks due to the shallow water and marshy bottom of the lake in this area. Pausche stated she is recommending approval due to the uniqueness of the area, including the uniformity of the dock sites and protection from ice heaving. Pausche stated the LMCD has approved the application in concept. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the New Multiple Dock (Minor Change) Application for the LMCD. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 10. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, requesting action on a Resolution Authorizing Transfer of Funds. Pausche emphasized the bottom line impact is zero, but that Staff has to get Council permission to transfer funds if it was not budgeted. The transfer was due to the difference between the estimate of the construction in progress and the actual expenditures by fund and to close out a construction fund balance to the debt service fund. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -27: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF FUNDS 11. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, requesting action on Resolution Supporting a Name Change for the Hennepin County Public Library in Mound. Hanson gave background on the events that led up to this proposal and stated that the head library director had reached out to her, so she assumes there is support at the county level. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -28: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A NAME CHANGE FOR THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY IN MOUND 12. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council Members /City Manager Hanson stated she is the guest speaker at the Minnesota Wastewater Operators conference and has been asked to explain the decision making process that was used during the bypass event last summer. B. Minutes: Docks & Commons Comm: March 19, 2015 DRAFT Parks & Open Spaces Comm: March 18, 2015 DRAFT -855- Mound City Council Minutes — March 24, 2015 C. Reports: Finance: Dec 31, 2014 DRAFT Year -End Reports Finance: Jan 31, 2015 Report D. Correspondence: Police Comm: March 11, 2015 13. Adiourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Gillispie, to adjourn at 8:58 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 14, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, April 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Heidi Gesch, Ray Salazar, Kelli Gillispie, and Jennifer Peterson Members absent: None. Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Director of Finance/Treasurer /Clerk Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, Evan Knollenberg, Katie Morford, Pete Wiechart, John Beise, Kristin Beise, Tim Litfin, Dale Copeman, Linda Olson, Laura Lloyd and Terry Olson. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $327,329.62 C. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -31: RESOLUTION APPROVING SEASONAL REQUEST FOR A 2015 MOUND FARMERS' MARKET & MORE IN DOWNTOWN MOUND AND APPROVING A REDUCED FEE DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF THE GATHERING D. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -32: RESOLUTION APPROVING A SEASONAL REQUEST FROM WESTONKA SOCCER CLUB FOR USE OF MOUND PARKS FOR 2015 SEASON AND APROVING A REDUCED FEE DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF THE GATHERING -857- Mound City Council Minutes —April 14, 2015 E. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -33: RESOLUTION APPROVING SPIRIT OF THE LAKES FESTIVAL PERMITS ON JULY 16 -19, AND WAIVING FEES DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF THE GATHERING 1. Public Gathering Permit 2. Parade Permit 3. Musical Concert Permit 4. Seasonal Banner and Portable Sign Permit 5. 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License 6. Outdoor Public Fireworks Display Permit F. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -34: RESOLUTION APPROVING MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION PERMITS FOR 2015 ANNUAL FISH FRY AND DANCE AND WAIVING FEES DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF THE GATHERING 1. Public Gathering Permit 2. Musical Concert Permit 3. Seasonal Banner and Portable Sign Permit 4. 1 -4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License G. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -35: RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION ESTABLISHING AN EARLY VOTING PROCESS FOR VOTERS IN MINNESOTA H. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -36: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2015 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT - GRANDVIEW BOULEVARD AND TUXEDO BOULEVARD, CITY PROJECT NOS. PW- 15 -01, PW -15- 02 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None Faulkner described the background that led to a joint project and highlighted the key components of the agreement. Faulkner said Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) will pay full construction costs, administration costs, and a portion of trenching costs, which Faulkner described as a win -win. Hanson highlighted this agreement is a reflection of the cooperation between the City and MCES that yields reduced costs /economies of scale. Mayor Wegscheid complemented Staff on the improved relationship with the MCES. Faulkner stated MCES has plans for $40 million of improvements in the area and additional projects are being discussed. 7. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council Members /City Manager Mayor Wegscheid stated the action on renaming the public library was just a suggestion and it is up to the County to decide whether or not to change the name of the Library. Mn Mound City Council Minutes —April 14, 2015 B. Minutes: Planning Commission: March 3, 2015 C. Reports: Finance: February, 2015 YTD Harbor Wine & Spirits: March, 2015 D. Correspondence: Mediacom letter: Apr 1, 2015 Jacob Stewart resignation 8. Adiourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn at 7:11 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk • Mayor Mark Wegscheid MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 15, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Wednesday, April 15, 2015, at 6:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid; Council Members Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, Heidi Gesch, and Jennifer Peterson Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Officer Ken Beck, Field Officer Stewart Simon, Bryan Gorman. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. 2. A. Part 1 - Classroom Basic National Incident Management System (NIMS) /Incident Command System (ICS) Introduction, Resources and Preparedness The Fire Chief walked through the Emergency Preparedness Reference Guide, played a training video and described the exercise that will be conducted in Part 2 of the training. 3. Adjourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn at 6:50 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid :.1 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 15, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Wednesday, April 15, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid; Council Members Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, Heidi Gesch, and Jennifer Peterson Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Department Head Annual Reports Annual reports were presented by Department Heads with discussion following. A. Liquor Store — Manager John Colotti B. Fire & Rescue /Emergency Response — Fire Chief Greg Pederson C. Orono Police Department — Police Chief Correy Farniok D. Finance & Administration /Docks Administration — Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche E. Community Development/P Ian ning /Zoning /Building Inspections — Community Development Director Sarah Smith F. Public Works (Parks) Operations & City Projects - Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson 3. Adiourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn at 9:10 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid :. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 22, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Wednesday, April 22, 2015, at 5:00 p.m. in the second level training room of the City Hall /Public Safety Building located at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid; Council Members Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, Heidi Gesch, and Jennifer Peterson Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Officer Ken Beck, Field Officer Stewart Simon, Ken Beck, Brian Berent, Bryan Gorman, Kevin Flaig, Mike Foley, Noah Iverson, Jason Maas, Mary Mackres, Mike McCarville, Katie Morford, Tony Myers, Jill Norlander, Jeff Ottenbreit, Greg Palm, Tanner Palm, Tim Palm, Betsy Phillips, Darren Poikonen, Tyler Rabe, Collette Roberts, Chris Vogt, Vicki Weber. 1. Open meeting Fire Chief Greg Pederson called the meeting to order at 5:04 p.m. 2. Fire Chief Greg Pederson with 2015 Training Plan: Tornado_ Touchdown and Fire Chief Greg Pederson gave an overview of the objectives of the hands on /simulation training, including exposing participants to the basics of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) /Incident Command System (ICS). Through a combination of lecture, video, and role- playing, the group experienced what it would be like to run an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in the event of a tornado touchdown. 3. Adjourn Fire Chief Greg Pederson closed the meeting at 6:57 p.m. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid i Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 0 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com April 22, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2014 Street and Utility Reconstruction Projects — Three Points West City Project No. PW -14 -01 Construction Testing Services Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: @ 0 We have requested and received a proposal from Braun Intertee for the necessary materials testing services for both the Three Points Boulevard West Utility Improvement project and the Three Points Boulevard West Street Improvement project. The West Utility Improvement project was awarded to Geislinger & Sons on November 12, 2014 and has recently commenced. The West Street Improvement project was awarded to Midwest Asphalt on March 1.0, 2015 and will begin in late July after the West Utility Improvement project is completed. The Construction Testing Services proposal, dated April 9, 2015, includes an estimated fee of $16,790. The amount of materials testing needed is somewhat variable depending on the soil conditions, weather, and any unforeseen conditions. The Three Points West Street Improvement Project materials testing portion of Braun Intertec's proposal includes the testing required for a Municipal State Aid (MSA) project. This project will be the City's first MSA city street project. Attached is a resolution for your consideration authorizing the City Manager to sign the proposal from Braun Intertec at an estimated amount of $16,790. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY MANGER TO SIGN PROPOSAL FOR CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY & RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS — WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND WEST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council has awarded contracts to: Geislinger & Sons, Inc. for the West Three Points Boulevard Utility Improvement project and Midwest Asphalt Corporation for the West Three Points Boulevard Street Improvement project; and WHEREAS, the West Three Points Boulevard Street Improvement project will be the City's first Municipal State Aid city street improvement project; and WHEREAS, the testing of materials and soils used by the contractors in completing these improvement projects must meet certain minimum strength and compaction requirements; and WHEREAS, a Construction Materials Testing Services proposal was requested from Braun Intertec due to their high level of expertise in providing the necessary and required amount of testing and documentation for Municipal State Aid projects; and WHEREAS, Braun Intertec provided a proposal to the City of Mound for Construction Materials Testing Services, dated April 9, 2015, at an estimated amount of $16,790.00; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services dated April 9, 2015 from Braun Intertec at an estimated fee of $16,790.00.00 Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of April 2015 ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor l B NJ April 22, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — Grandview Blvd. and Tuxedo Blvd, City Project Nos. PW- 15 -01, PW -15 -02 Construction Cooperative Agreement For Construction Of Sanitary Sewer Pipe In Mound, MN Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: At the April 14, 2015 City Council meeting, the above noted project was awarded to Geislinger & Sons, Inc. Also at that meeting, you received the draft of the Construction Cooperative Agreement between the Metropolitan Council (Met Council) and City for the incorporation of Met Council facility upgrades as part of the 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement project— Tuxedo Boulevard, along with the City Engineer's briefing of its contents. The final Construction Cooperative Agreement has now been completed including the cost sharing items, a copy of which is attached. The approving Resolution for this Agreement is also attached for your consideration and requested approval. It is anticipated that the Met Council's consideration for approval of this Cooperative Agreement will occur in late April or early May. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer IMMOUMC12108886 \I_CorresT Docs\2015 -04 -22 Ur to Council, MCES Coop Agreemencdoc DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer I. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 1I5- RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER PIPE IN MOUND, MN WHEREAS, city staff has been working with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) staff on ways to upgrade both the City's and the Metropolitan Council's respective sewer systems, and WHEREAS, the opportunity to improve the Metropolitan Council's interceptor sewer system in a timely and cost effective manner was identified through a joint effort within the scope of the City's authorized 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Grandview Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council authorized the preparation of interceptor improvement plans within Tuxedo Boulevard from Sulgrove Road to Brighton Commons; and WHEREAS, the MCES staff and their consultant have been working closely with City staff, City Engineer and City Attorney on a cost - sharing agreement to cover administrative, testing, surveying, inspection and construction costs; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council's interceptor sewer improvement plans were completed and incorporated into the City's Tuxedo Boulevard Street and Utility Improvement plans; and WHEREAS, the City awarded a contract to Geislinger & Sons, Inc. on April 14, 2015 for the 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — Grandview Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard which included Part B, Metropolitan Council interceptor sewer upgrades, as requested by the Metropolitan Council in writing; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that the Construction Cooperative Agreement For Construction Of Sanitary Sewer Pipe In Mound, MN is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign said agreement, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council this 281h day of April 2015 Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk :.. Mark Wegscheid, Mayor SENT VIA E -MAIL April 22, 2015 Mr. Daniel Faulkner Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sr. Engineer —City of Mound 2638 Shadow Lane #1200 Chaska MN 55318 -1172 Re: 6 -MT- 647/6 -MO -651 Alternative Routing — City of Mound MAI Metropolitan Council Contract Number 151032 Contract Transmittal Dear Mr. Faulkner: Attached, please find the PDF of the agreement for 6 -MT- 647/6 -MO -651 Alternative Routing — City of Mound MAI project. Please print two copies (one- sided), obtain the City of Mound's signatures on both copies, and return both originals to: Casi Butts Metropolitan Council 390 N. Robert St. St. Paul MN 55101 Upon receipt of the two signed copies, the Metropolitan Council will execute and we will send you one original copy. if you have any questions, please contact Casi Butts at Casi.Butts@metc.state.mn.us. Sincerely, Micky Gutzmann, CPPO Director, Procurement M RG /m Ir cc: Christopher Remus, Project Manager n:/cpu/m ces/151032/Contra ctTra nsm ittaI ,it gli,F' ert tre l itn•th 5aintPaul,'MN 55901 -1805 ...t .1550 ) TTY1351.291 -0904 metro6ou c),�t� • s �i Metropolitan Council No. 151032 CONSTRUCTION COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER PIPE IN MOUND, MN THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the Metropolitan Council, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "Council" and the City of Mound, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City ". BACKGROUND RECITALS 1. The City plans to reconstruct Tuxedo Boulevard in Mound during the 2015 construction season (PW 15 -02), which project is hereinafter referred to as the "City Project ". 2. To avoid additional disruption to the community, Council desires to construct a 6 -inch sanitary sewer forcemain and 12 -inch gravity pipe and associated structures hereinafter referred to as "Council Project" from Lift Station L50 extending along the Tuxedo Boulevard alignment and terminating at Brighton Commons; as further set forth in Exhibit A. 3. Both Council and City desire that the Council Project be constructed in conjunction with the City Project. 4. The term "Council's authorized representative" means the person designated in writing by Council's General Manager of Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES), as Council's authorized representative. 5. Council is not staffed or equipped to construct the Council Project during the 2015 construction season. 6. Therefore, Council desires to have the City construct the Council Project contemporaneously with the City Project. 7. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.504, subdivision 12, Council is authorized to contract with any local government unit for the performance on Council's behalf of any service on such terms as may be agreed upon by the contracting parties. 8. Council and the City agree that each is authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Council Action No. 2015 -8 approved on January 28, 2015, and that said work provisions will be carried out by the parties hereto as provided by this Agreement under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, NOW, THEREFORE, for mutual consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows: Metropolitan Council No. 151032 AGREEMENT I. Purpose of Agreement 1. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions and responsibilities of each of the Parties to this Agreement for design and construction of the Council Project. The Council hereby appoints the City as its agent to obtain bids, enter into a contract for the construction of the work, and observe the work performed on the Council Project for compliance with the Council Project construction documents and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2. For purposes of this Agreement the scope of the Council Project is as follows: Construction of approximately 950 feet of new 6 -inch sanitary forcemain pipe and 2,616 feet of new 12 -inch gravity pipe and structures. The Council Project will begin at Lift Station L50, extend along the Tuxedo Boulevard alignment, and terminate at Brighton Commons. 3. The location of the City Project and the Council Project is shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. H. Construction Documents 1. Council and /or its agents, at no cost to the City, shall prepare the necessary detailed construction documents for the Council Project ( "Council Project Construction Documents "). The Council Project Construction Documents shall contain plans and specifications and a schedule for construction of the Council Project, All Council Project Construction Documents shall be developed in accordance with the most recent standards and practices of the Council for interceptors. Council and /or its agents have prepared a construction cost estimate for the Council Project, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 2. The Council Project Construction Documents prepared by Council and /or its agents that are to be incorporated into the bidding documents for the City Project shall be prepared and certified by a Registered Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota. All Council Project Construction Documents shall be made available to the City in a timely manner for periodic review as requested by the City. All Council Project Construction Documents must meet the approval of the City Engineer or designated City representative prior to being incorporated into the City's plans for the City Project by the City Engineer. 3. Council shall deliver to the City all original, reproducible, certified final Council Project Construction Documents to be incorporated into the City's bidding documents on a schedule that will allow for letting and awarding of a construction contract for the City Road Project. In addition, Council shall provide the City a list of no fewer than four (4) contractors :.• Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 prequalified by Council to perform the following work: temporary flow conveyance for pipe installation that is to be coordinated with the City Project. 4. Council shall retain ownership of all original Council Project Construction Documents prepared by Council and /or its agents. Upon completion by the City of all reproduction deemed necessary for bidding and construction purposes, the City will provide to Council the originals of said Council Project Construction Documents. 5. City Engineer shall incorporate the Council Project Construction Documents into the City Project construction documents on file with the City, which upon being merged shall herein be referred to as the "Combined Project Construction Documents" and the Council Project incorporated into the City Project shall herein be referred to as the "Combined Project." III. Easements and Permits I. City, at its sole expense, shall acquire all permanent and temporary permits, easements and property interests necessary for the City Project. 2. As of the date of this Agreement, no additional property acquisition is required for construction and installation of the Council Project within the City Project. Council shall be responsible for all land acquisitions outside of the City Project under this Agreement necessary to install the Council Project. 3. Council shall be responsible to pay the fee and to obtain the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ( "MPCA ") permit for the Council Project. 4. City shall be responsible to obtain all other permits associated with construction of the Combined Projects. IV. Procedure for Acceptance of Bids 1. Council, in connection with the construction of the Council Project, does hereby appoint the City as its agent to advertise for bids for the work and construction of the Council Project, to receive and open bids, pursuant to said advertisement and enter into a construction contract with a successful bidder for the Combined Project, at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder, and to construct the Council Project in accordance with the Council Project Construction Documents, accepted by the Council in accordance with Section IV of this Agreement, except that any matters relating to contractor prequalification shall be the responsibility of Council. 2. The City will advertise for bids for the work and construction of the Combined Project, receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement and may, subject to the procedure set forth in this Section IV and the City's acceptance of one of the bids submitted, enter into a 1 Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 construction contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder, in accordance with applicable law. The bidding documents will require a separate line item(s), percentages, and /or agreed quantities within a line item(s) in the bid for the Council Project showing the items included in Council Project, quantities and prices. Upon opening the bids, the City will provide a written tabulation of the bids to Council together with the City's recommendation for selection of the lowest responsible bidder. In the event that the line item(s) for Council Project in the lowest responsible bid is one - hundred twenty (120) percent or more of the construction cost estimate, in the final Council Project Construction Documents accepted by the Council, excluding contract administration costs, for Council Project as shown on Exhibit B, the City will not award the construction contract for the Council Project portion of the City Project, unless the Council provides written notice to the City stating that the Council agrees to be bound by the unit prices for the Council Project in the bid. Council shall provide such written notice to City within ten (10) calendar days of the bid tabulation and bidder recommendation sent by City to Council. In the event that there is no such written notification provided by Council within ten (10) calendar days, the bids for the Council Project shall be deemed to be accepted by Council. In the event that Council provides such written notice to City that it will not be bound by the bid prices for the Council Project due to the bid for the Council Project being one - hundred twenty percent (120 %) or more of the construction cost estimate for the Council Project, this Agreement shall terminate and Council shall compensate the City for the Council Project related costs incurred as of the date of termination, plus the associated administrative fee in accordance with Section IX. If the City decides not to award the City Project, this contract shall terminate and Council shall compensate the City for the Council Project related costs incurred as of the date of the termination in accordance with Section IX. If the City recommends award of the construction contract, but the Council with respect to the Council Project, decides not to proceed with the Council Project prior to the City's award of the construction contract, Council payment to the City shall be limited to administrative costs associated with incorporation of the Council Project Construction Documents into the City Project construction documents as outlined by Section IX and in Exhibit B. 3. The construction contract entered into by the City for the City Project will include the Council Project Construction Documents reviewed and accepted by the Council in accordance with Section II of this Agreement, and provide that Council Project shall be constructed according to Council Project Construction Documents. Not less than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to commencement of Council's Project by the City, the City will give written notice to Council of the contractor's intention to commence construction, said notice be directed as follows: Leisa Thompson, General Manager Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 390 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 -871- Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 4. In the event Council decides not to construct Council Project, nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit City from undertaking City Project. V. Construction and Contract Administration 1. The City and its designated agents will perform, direct, and supervise all construction, contract administration and inspection required to complete the Council Project. All work for the Council Project shall be performed in accordance with the Council Project Construction Documents provided by Council, and will be kept on file at the offices of Council, 390 Robert Street North, St. Paul, Minnesota and City of Mound City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Blvd., Mound, Minnesota. 2. Council's authorized representative shall inspect the work during the construction of the Council Project, but the Council's authorized representative does not have the responsibility for supervision of the Council Project. The Council's authorized representative shall cooperate with the City's Engineer or designated representative to the extent necessary while performing the inspections. It is understood and agreed that the Council's authorized representative shall be available at all times during construction of the Council Project. Further, it is understood and agreed that the Council's authorized representative shall have the authority and experience to make needed decisions necessary as it relates to construction of the Council Project so as not cause delay of construction of the City Project or the Combined Project 3. If Council reasonably determines that the work of the Council Project has not been constructed substantially in accordance with the final Council Project Construction Documents, Council through its authorized representative shall inform the City of such defects within five (5) business days. Council will further inform the City of the specific reason or reasons for non - conformance to the Council Project Construction Documents and the actions, in the opinion of Council, that must be taken to make the Council Project conform to the Council Project Construction Documents and become fully operational. The City shall require its contractor to make the corrections or meet the requirements, or both, of the Council Project Construction Documents requested by Council through its authorized representative. -872- Metropolitan Council No. 151032 4. The City will inform Council in writing of completion of construction of the Council Project. Within five (5) business days of receiving written notice, Council will inform City in writing either that the Council Project as constructed conforms to the Council Project Construction Documents and is fully operational or that the Council Project does not conform to the Council Project Construction Documents and is not fully operational. Council's authorized representative shall participate in any substantial completion, as that term is defined in the Combined Construction Documents, inspection of the Council Project and provide the City with a punch list within seven (7) calendar days of any substantial completion inspection of any items that the Council determines need to be addressed before the Council Project is deemed to be completed. The final decision on conformance and the operability of the Council Project to the Council Construction Documents will be made by Council. Council has the exclusive right to determine whether the Combined Project contractor has satisfactorily performed the Council Project in conformance with the Council Project Construction Documents. 5. Within seven (7) calendar days of City's written notice to the Council of completion of the punch list items for the Council Project, Council will inform the City in writing either that the Council's Project has been constructed and conforms to the Council Project Construction Documents and is fully operational, or that Council's Project has not been constructed in accordance with the Council Project Construction Documents, and /or the punch list items that remain to be completed. The final decision on conformance of Council's Project to the Council Project Construction Documents will be made by Council. Evidence of acceptance of Council's Project will be in writing by letter from Council's General Manager of MCES. 6. Council agrees that the City may make minor changes in the Council Project Construction Documents and the Combined Project Construction Documents or in the character of said interceptor construction that is reasonably necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the Council that the City may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the City's contractor on the Combined Project for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the Council Project. Said changes may result in an increase or decrease to the Council cost participation described in Section IX. 7. Council shall have the right to review any change in the plans and specifications as they relate to cost participation set forth in Section IX. Council's authorized representative shall have the right to approve any change orders or supplemental agreements prepared by the City that affect the Council share of the construction cost. 8. After reasonable written notice to the City, Council may require City to make reasonable changes to or reasonable modifications in the scope of the Council Project. City hereby agrees to direct the Combined Project contractor(s) to construct said reasonable modifications or changes provided however, that the cost of such changes or modifications be borne solely by Council. -873- Metropolitan Council No. 151032 9. Council further agrees that it will participate in the settlement of any claims from the Combined Project contractor(s) that involve project delays attributable in any way to Council requests for changes or modifications to the Construction Documents for the Council Project, City Project, or Combined Project, or any combination thereof, as provided in this Section. The amount of participation by Council in any claims shall be commensurate with the percentage of delay directly attributable to its actions as determined by the Council's authorized representative and the City Engineer. 10. During the construction of the Council Project, there will be no interruptions of the Council's sewer service without written consent of the Council; and 11. During construction of the Council Project, there will be no interruptions in the sanitary sewer transport system that will affect the Council billing process and procedures without written consent of the Council. 12. The City or its designated representative will prepare and provide the Council with weekly progress reports describing the Combined Project construction activities. VI. Modifications to Construction Documents 1. City will submit any amendments to or material changes in the Council Project Construction Documents to the Council's authorized representative for review and acceptance, which acceptance will not be unreasonably withheld and shall be communicated by notice from Council to City within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of such amendment or change. City agrees that it will not proceed with amendment to or changes in the approved final Council Project Construction Documents of the Council Project until the Council has consented to such change in accordance with its procedures and has approved such change in writing as evidenced by letter to City from the Council's General Manager of MCES. 2. Through written request, Council may require City to make changes to or modifications in the scope of the Council Project and City hereby agrees to have the Combined Project contractor construct the required modifications or changes, provided, however, that (i) the cost of such changes or modifications shall be borne solely by the Council and (ii) such changes or modifications shall not increase the cost of or delay completion of the City Project. VII. Entry onto Easements 1. The City hereby grants to Council the right to enter onto City property and any easements and rights -of -way that City may have obtained for construction of the City Project for the purpose of Council fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement. ME Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 2. Council hereby grants to City and City contractors and agents the right to enter onto Council property and any easements and rights -of -way that Council may have obtained for the Council Project for the purpose of the City fulfilling its obligations under this Agreement. VIII. Omitted. IX. Cost Participation 1. The Council shall reimburse the City as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Council's financial responsibility for the Combined Project shall be limited to the following: actual costs of construction for the Council Project; actual costs of the surveying, inspection, and testing necessary to construct the Council Project; actual costs of construction for portions of the City Project as shown in Exhibit B; and a three percent (3 %) contract administration fee to cover other costs associated with the Combined Project. 2. The parties further agree that the project costs stated above in this Section IX and more specifically shown on Exhibit B to this Agreement are an estimate of the portions of the design and construction costs for the contract work on the Council Project. The unit prices set forth in the City's construction contract and the final quantities as measured by the City Engineer's designated representatives shall govern in computing the total final contract construction cost, including the cost of amendments and change orders as provided in Section VI of this Agreement, for determination of the final Council Project construction and administration costs for reimbursement to the City by Council. 3. All direct payments to the City's contractor for work performed on the Council Project will be made by the City. X. Payment and Record Drawings 1. The City shall, when the Combined Project construction contract is awarded by the City, prepare a revised Exhibit B, which shall have the Council Project construction costs and which shall be in accordance with the bid procedure and bid price as set forth in Section IV of this Agreement. Said revised Exhibit B shall be substituted for the Exhibit B attached to this Agreement without the need for an amendment to this Agreement based on the actual, reasonable, and verifiable design costs and contract unit prices. The City shall submit a copy to Council. Within thirty (30) days of submission of the revised Exhibit B to Council, Council shall pay to the City twenty -five percent (25 %) of the Council Project construction costs all as shown in Exhibit B. 2. During construction the Council shall reimburse the City for the Council Project based upon monthly invoices submitted by the City, which shall include a progress report and payment claim. The Council shall have fourteen (14) calendar days from receipt of such invoice -875- Metropolitan Council No. 151032 to contest the amount due. Council shall reimburse City within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the invoice if it is uncontested or within thirty (30) calendar days of resolution if the invoice is contested. 3. Upon substantial completion of the work, the City shall prepare an updated cost participation breakdown showing actual, reasonable and verifiable construction costs that will be based upon the contract unit prices and the actual units of work performed and submit a copy to Council. The administrative costs to be paid to the City by Council shall be based on this estimated final construction cost. The City shall add to Council's final construction costs, the construction administrative costs, the costs of supplemental agreements, if any, and deduct Council funds previously advanced to the City for the project by Council. Council agrees to pay to the City any amounts due, if more than the amount of the total of the partial payments made by Council pursuant to Section IX of this Agreement. Council shall make such payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice from the City. 4. In the event the calculations show that Council has advanced funds in greater amount than is due the City, the City shall refund without interest the amount to Council. 5. Payment by Council as provided above in this Section shall be adjusted by any change orders approved by Council as provided in Section VI of this Agreement. XI. Ownership/Maintenance 1. The bonds and warranties obtained in the bid process and in any resulting contract shall be issued in the name of the City and thereafter assigned to the Council as set forth in this paragraph, except that if a surety prohibits such an assignment then said bonds and warranties shall be issued in the name of both the City and the Council. Upon completion of the construction of the Council Project and acceptance of the Council Project by Council pursuant to this Agreement, the Council Project shall become property of the Council and all associated warranties and guarantees provided by the construction contractors and subcontractors performing work for the Council Project shall become the property of Council. 2. Upon Council becoming the owner of the Council Project, Council will be responsible for operation and maintenance of the Council Project. 3. If Council chooses not to have the City incorporate the Council Project into a combined project construction contract with the City Project, the Council shall own the Preliminary Design Document and Council Project Construction Documents and Council shall be responsible for any administrative fees incurred by the City to prepare combined project reviews and bid documents, as set out in Exhibit B. Metropolitan Council No. 151032 XII. Liability 1. Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The City's and Council's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. 2. The City and Council each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self- insurance program and have minimum coverage consistent with the liability limits contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver or limitation of any immunity or limitation on liability for which the City and Council are entitled. 3. The City further agrees that the Combined Project construction contract let by the City shall include clauses that: 1) require the Combined Project contractor to defend, indemnify, and save harmless Council, its officers, agents and employees from claims, suits, demands, damages, judgments, costs, interest, expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees, witness fees and disbursements incurred in the defense thereof) arising out of or by reason of the acts or omissions of the said Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 2) require the Combined Project contractor to provide and maintain insurance as provided on Exhibit C naming Council as additional insured; and 3) require the Combined Project contractor to be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this Agreement. XIII. General Provisions 1. All records kept by the City and Council with respect to the Council Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. All data collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose by the activities of the City and Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, as amended ( "Act "), and the Minnesota Rules implementing such Act now in force or hereafter adopted. 2. Applicable provisions of Minnesota state law, federal law and of any applicable local ordinances shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. Specifically, the City agrees to comply with all federal, state and local applicable laws and ordinances applicable to and binding upon the City relating to nondiscrimination, affirmative action, public purchases, contracting, employment, including workers' compensation and surety deposits required for construction contracts. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of the City shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 3. Any and all employees of each of the respective parties hereto, and all other persons engaged by each respective party in the performance of any work or services required or provided herein to be performed by the respective party shall not be considered employees of any of the other parties hereto, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act or the Minnesota Economic Security Law of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission of the part of said employees while so engaged, on any work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of other respective party hereto. 4. With respect to the Combined Project, if hazardous wastes, pollutants or contaminants as those terms are defined under any federal, State of Minnesota or local statute, ordinance, code or regulation exist on the Combined Project site and to the extent that any such environmental conditions are found that will require any response or remedial action, monitoring or reporting requirements under any local, State of Minnesota or federal law, the City shall utilize its best efforts to secure compliance of such response, remedial action, monitoring and reporting requirements and shall apply for and shall have the Council named as beneficiary in any and all no association letters, no action /no further action letters and other environmental regulatory assurances required for or applicable to the site. The City will provide to the Council copies of Phase I and Phase II environmental investigations, the approved Response Action Plan, and the environmental assurance letters naming the Council as beneficiary. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require that the City accept responsibility for any environmental conditions that would not be the City's responsibility under applicable law. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 5. In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of Council so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Public Works Director, or a designated City representative, shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the City and serve as liaison between the City and Council. 6. In order to coordinate the services of Council with the activities of the City so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Council's authorize representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of Council and serve as liaison between Council and the City. 7. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any of the Exhibits attached hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. 8. The Background Recitals are incorporated herein and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. Metropolitan Council No, 15I032 9. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, invalid, or unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement unless the part or parts which are void, invalid or otherwise unenforceable shall substantially impair the value of the entire Agreement with respect to the parties. One or more waivers by said party of any provision, term, condition or covenant shall not be construed by the other party as a waiver of a subsequent breach of the same by the other party. 10. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. 11. The covenants of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns. This Agreement is not intended to for the benefit of any third -party. 12. This Agreement is entered into in and under the laws of the State of Minnesota and shall be interpreted in accordance therewith. 13. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement may be terminated by the mutual agreement of the parties. 14. Neither party will be responsible to the other for a failure to perform or a delay in performance under this Agreement, if some failure or delay is due to a force majeure event. A force majeure event is an event beyond a party's reasonable control, including but not limited to unusually severe weather, fire, floods, other acts of God, labor disputes, acts of war or terrorism, or public health emergencies. 15. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, Council agrees that the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by City and the state auditor or legislative auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement. 16. Any notice or demand, which may or must be given or made by a party hereto, under the terms of this Agreement or any statute or ordinance, shall be in writing and shall be sent (i) certified mail, (ii) by e -mail, provided that the recipient of such notice acknowledges receipt by e -mail or otherwise in writing, or (iii) delivered in person to the other party addressed to the following authorized representatives: General Manager Public Works Director Metropolitan Council Environmental Services City of Mound 390 Robert Street North 2415 Wilshire Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 Mound, MN 55364 [The remainder of this page is intentionally blank.] - . Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, A public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota By: Patrick P. Born, Regional Administrator Date: CITY OF MOUND A municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota By: Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Date: and Kandis Hanson, City Manager Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: City Engineer Date: ::I Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A - City Project and Council Project Locations Exhibit B - Council Project Construction Costs Estimates Exhibit C - Contractor Insurance Certificate (to be included when Combined Project construction contract is awarded) NO Metropolitan Council No. 15I032 Exhibit A City Project and Council Project Locations :: I U V o m x w v V Metropolitan Council No, 15I032 Exhibit B Council Project Construction Costs Estimates [Note to City: make sure this list includes surveying, construction inspection, geotechnical testing and contract administration, & City Engineer's charges to incorporate the Council Project Construction Documents into the City Project construction documents] it \( ( ) \ ( ) /\ /j \\ \\ \� k z # z z k E § ( : � \ ) ( \ \ . _ \ \ » 2 } ( ( / ! / ) j ) ( ..885- /\ /j \\ \\ \� Exhibit C Contractor Insurance Certificate ::. Metropolitan Council No. 151032 i Consulting Engineers & Surveyors �� 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com April 22, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Wilshire Boulevard Trunk Watermain Upgrade Preparation of Engineering Report Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: t A water supply and distribution computer model was created some years ago to determine what size watermain lines) should be provided to meet the overall water supply and fire protection needs of the Island. This model has been updated over the years as improvements have been made to the City's water supply and distribution system. The model has indicated the need for an equivalent 16 -inch water supply line to the Island. Currently, the only potable water supply line to Island Park is an 8 -inch watermain in Wilshire Boulevard from Bartlett Boulevard to Bradford Lane. There is a need for a significant increase in the size of the trunk watermain serving the Island as well as a need for a secondary water supply source. An analysis of the secondary water supply source is currently underway, per the Council's authorization at the January 27, 2015 Council meeting. An opportunity for providing a larger trunk water supply line to the Island has recently occurred due to the Metropolitan Council's (Met Council) aggressive approach to upgrade its interceptor sewer facilities within Mound. Part of the Met Council's upgrades will be done within Wilshire Boulevard from Bradford Lane to a manhole near City Hall. We have been working with Met Council staff on concepts for including an upgrade to the City's trunk watermain in Wilshire Boulevard to the Island as part of a Met Council project. This would be very similar to thejoint project work the Council has just approved for the Tuxedo Boulevard p %ject. In order to proceed with the Wilshire Boulevard trunk watermain upgrade, we are requesting the Council's authorization to prepare an Engineering Report for this improvement project. This project is not in the City's current 5 -Year Capital Improvement Plan so some adjustments may need to be made to take advantage of this opportunity in a timely manner. Please consider the attached Resolution requesting authorization for Bolton & Menk, Inc. to prepare an Engineering Report for Wilshire Blvd. Trunk Watermain Upgrades, Bartlett Blvd. to Bradford Lane. Respectfully Submitted, BOLTON & MF,NK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, Y.E. City Engineer CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON TRUNK WATERMAIN, WILSHIRE BOULEVARD FROM BARTLETT BOULEVARD TO BRADFORD LANE WHEREAS, improvements to the City's water distribution system have been completed as part of the City's annual street and utility reconstruction projects over many of the past years' projects; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2015 the City Council authorized the preparation of a Report on the feasibility of constructing a secondary source of potable water to Island Park by directionally drilling a main under Emerald Lake from Bartlett Boulevard to Tyrone Lane, and WHEREAS, a water supply and distribution model of the City's system has been completed indicating the need for a larger supply line than currently exists in Wilshire Boulevard from Bartlett Boulevard to Bradford Lane in addition to a secondary supply source; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has advanced their Regional Interceptor Sewer upgrade plans in the City of Mound to include upgrades to their system from Sulgrove Road via Tuxedo Boulevard /Brighton Commons /Manchester Road /Bradford Lane/Wilshire Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Cooperative Agreement with the Metropolitan Council forjoint system improvements in Tuxedo Boulevard from Sulgrove Road to Brighton Commons, as part of the City's 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — Grandview Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has now authorized plans for system upgrades to their facilities from Brighton Commons to and including Wilshire Boulevard from Bradford Lane to near City Hall and is offering the City the opportunity to include with their project, the upgrade of the City's watermain within Wilshire Boulevard; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that trunk watermain upgrades in Wilshire Boulevard from Bradford Lane to Bartlett Boulevard be referred to Bolton & Menk, Inc. for study and that they are instructed to report to the Council as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost effective, and feasible. Adopted by the City Council this 281' day of April 2015 ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk ::: Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Consulting Engineers & Surveyors > 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www,bolton- menk.com April 22, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2015 Lift Station Improvement Project City Project No. PW -I5 -04 Award of Bid Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: Bids were received on April 21, 2015 for the 2015 Lift Station Improvement Project, Lift Station C2, Sumach Lane, with the following results: Contractor Base Bid Amt. + CAy Purchase Alternate Bid Amt. + City Purchase Pember Companies $252,176.00 $236,236.00 Geislinger & Sons $359,483.50 $324,043.50 Minger Construction $360,947.65 $335,507.65 Penn Contracting $390,634.00 $375,194.00 The base bid included the installation of a city - purchased pre - engineered packaged lift station which includes pumps and valves. The alternate bid included the standard precast concrete lift station as part of the bid along with its installation. With the alternate bid, the City purchases the pumps which the contractor installs. In both the base bid and alternate bid, the city purchases the control panel and the backup generator. The city - purchased items for the base bid total $137,626.00. The city - purchased items for the alternate bid total $102,186.00. The engineer's estimate with city - purchased items was $248,798.50 for the base bid and $258,358.50 for the alternate bid. The alternate bid submitted by Pember Companies is the `low" bid and over 8% below the engineer's estimate. The low bidder, Pember Companies, out of Menomonie, WI has successfully completed similar lift station installations for the City of Faribault, MN as well as in the City of Hudson, WI. It is my recommendation that the Council approve the attached resolution awarding the 2015 Lift Station Improvement Project to Pember Companies in the amount of $134,050.00. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC.. egill_� '_411114 u edlil t ,.,__ Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer S:• CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2015 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PW- 15 -04), LS C2, SUMACH LANE WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2015 Lift Station Improvement Project, bids were received on April 21, 2015 opened and tabulated according to law, with the following bids received and complying with the advertisement: Base Bid Alternate Bid Pember Companies $114,550.00 $134,050.00 Geislinger & Sons, Inc. $221,857.50 $221,857.50 Minger Construction $223,321.65 $233,321.65 Penn Contracting $253,008.00 $273,008.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Pember Companies is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Pember Companies out of Menomonie, WI in the name of the City of Mound for the 2015 Lift Station Improvement Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by the City Council this 281h day of April 2015. ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk i•1 Mark Wegscheid, Mayor 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: April 23, 2015 Re: April 28, 2015 City Council Consent Agenda Item — 2015 Fishers of Men Special Event Summary. A Public Gathering Permit application was submitted by Joe Lemmerman, requesting use of Centerview Beach, for the 2015 Fishers of Men fishing tournament being held on Saturday, June 6, 2015 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Details. • Members may recall that this is a longstanding event in Mound and has been held at CenterviewBeach for several years. ® The applicant paid the required application fee of $300 and $500 damage deposit for the 1- day event. • Expected attendance is 50 -100 people. • Staff has informed Orono Police Chief Farniok, Public Works Supterindent Hanson and Fire Chief Pederson about the upcoming event and has also contacted the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, the Hennepin County Transportation Department and the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol about the event. Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the requested permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of all required local and public agency permits that are needed to hold the events. Applicant shall provide copies of all said permits to the City prior to the issuance and release of the Public Gathering Permit 2. Applicant shall work with the Orono Police Department, the Fire Department, and and the Public Works Department regarding logistics for the upcoming event including, but not limited to, equipment and personnel needs, site set -up and staging, traffic /pedestrian control and circulation, etc. Applicant is responsible for payment of fees for public safety or public services that may apply. :• 3. As applicable, amplified music, speakers and PA /sound systems are to be directed in the direction best suited to minimize impact upon neighbors. 4. Placement of any and /or all temporary signs shall be subject to regulations contained in City Code Chapter 119 and may include issuance of a permit and payment of the required fee. Applicant shall work with the Community Development Department to determine if a temporary sign permit is required. 5. No signage can be placed upon private property unless permission from the private property owner and /or other interested party has been provided to the applicant who shall be responsible for obtaining same. 6. Signage placement is subject to review and approval by the City of Mound. No signage shall be placed in a location so as to affect vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The City of Mound reserves the right to modify sign placement in the field. 7. Signage placed outside of the City's approval of the temporary permit shall be subject to removal by the City. 8. The submittal of a Certificate of Insurance, naming the City of Mound as an additional insured , is required and shall be provided prior to the release and issuance of the Public Gathering Permit. Required insurance and coverage shall be in accordance with the City's established policies. Applicant to work with Finance Director Catherine Pausche regarding the form and required amounts for the Certificate of Insurance. 9. Applicant is advised that no special parking approvals in the park /launch area or on local streets are granted as part of the Council's approval of the Public Gathering Permit. 10. If different from the application, contact information, including name and cell phone number, for the person(s) who will be on site the day of the event shall be provided prior to the release of the Public Gathering Permit. Page 2 -892- 4 -- oo CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMLr Use of a public part: or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use ofthe part: or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAYBE USED IN ANY OF TIIE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300 /DAY TO $600 /DAY* DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000 /DAY* _ *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s)ofUse JuNe Area to be Used 1 / eL'rk%l�� Time Frame /Vbc-.3 Intended UseIE Expected Attendance Organization �l rjiy ±1V - �P—� Representative'sName_ vJC) � Y-VI y"I N��I f�i� M— Address ��Qrr )� �� ! ��1�I�0 Telephone No, HoLcc' 7) t i -�— -5 �ork:. Drivers License Number , City Clerk Police Dept. Park Dept. Fire Dept. -893- Minnesota MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Region 3 Fisheries 1200 Warner Road, St Paul MN 55106 Phone: 651- 259 - 5831 /Fax: 651 -772 -7977 DEPAAi11FMOF XANPALAESOOgCEa " : c �ZK�l ►`WIC�Y11�iT.9:ill`ll71Y117) ►►�`7_�ah►Y�lt Permission is hereby granted to the individual and/or organization named below to conduct a fishing tournament under the provisions of this permit, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes and Rules. Name of Tournament. Permit Number: Fishers of Men 15- 314 -T25 Name of Permittee: Telephone Number (Include Area Code): 1Joseph E. Lemmerman 612- 716 -2546 Address (No. & Street, RFD, Box No., City, State, Zip Code): 5007 110th St. SE Delano, MN 55328 Name of Sponsor (Organization, Firm or Individual): Fishers of Men TOURNAMENT DETAIL Name of Waters: Acres: County: Division of Waters I.D. Number: Minnetonka 14,729 Hennepin 27 -0133 ruviic r�wcsa w uc uacu �occ rr� vu icvwac muc.r. All Public Launch's Tournament Species: Largemouth & Smallmouth Bass Weigh -in Stations: Catch and Release Tournament: X Yes / _ No Centerview Park in Harrison's Bay Estimated No. of Entrants: Boats: Beginning Date: Terminating Date: 100 50 June 6, 2015 June 6, 2015 Daily Fishing Hours Entry Fee per Individual Estimated Total Prize Value 5:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. $150 $4,000 Aaartional Jt[pulationslUonairions: aee Keverse Jlae. *The permittee shall submit a report on forms provided, to the Regional Fisheries Manager identified below, within 30 days after completion of the contest. Regional ice- C,ibution. • St. Paul Fisheries Office • Regional Fisheries Manager • Area Fisheries Supervisor • Area Trails & Waterways Supervisor • Area Conservation Officer I Kegional Plshenes Address: DNR Region 3 Fisheries Manager 1200 Warner Road St Paul Me SS106 -6793 r65112r$94- 7�'lt-I 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: April 21, 2015 Re: April 28, 2015 City Council Consent Agenda Item — 2015 Minnetonka Classic Bass Club Special Event Summary. A Public Gathering Permit application was submitted by Larry Krohn, on behalf of the Minnetonka Classic Bass Club, to use Surfside Park & Beach for the 2015 Minnetonka Classic Bass Club Fishing Tournament being held on Saturday, May 30, 2015 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Details. This is an annual event that has been taking place at Surfside Park & Beach in Mound for approximately 20 years and includes use of the launch area and the southeast corner of the beach, east of the swimming area, for the weigh -in station. Similar to previous years, they are also requesting permission to parka trailer on the lawn in the area behind the portable restrooms. The Public Works Department has advised that the lawn area is not available and suggests that space in the parking lot, to be determined by the City, can be made available to accommodate the trailer for the special event. • The applicant paid the required public gathering permit fee of $300 and $500 damage deposit for the 1 -day event. • 100 participants are expected along with 30 -40 spectators. Staff has informed Orono Police Chief Farniok, Public Works Supterindent Hanson and Fire Chief Pederson about the upcoming event and has also contacted the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, the Hennepin County Transportation Department and the Hennepin County Sheriffs Water Patrol about the event. Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the requested permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of all required local and public agency permits that are needed to hold the events. Applicant shall provide copies of all said permits to the City prior to the issuance and release of the Public Gathering Permit 2. Applicant shall work with the Orono Police Department, the Fire Department, and and the Public Works Department regarding logistics for the upcoming event including, but not limited to, equipment and personnel needs, site set -up and staging, traffic /pedestrian control and circulation, etc. Applicant is responsible for payment of fees for public safety or public services that may apply. 3. Permission is granted to allow the parking of one trailer in the parking lot, in a location to be determined in cooperation with the Public Works Department. 4. As applicable, amplified music, speakers and PA /sound systems are to be directed in the direction best suited to minimize impact upon neighbors. 5. Placement of any and /or all temporary signs shall be subject to regulations contained in City Code Chapter 119 and may include issuance of a permit and payment of the required fee. Applicant shall work with the Community Development Department to determine if a temporary sign permit is required. 6. No signage can be placed upon private property unless permission from the private property owner and /or other interested parry has been provided to the applicant who shall be responsible for obtaining same. 7. Signage placement is subject to review and approval by the City of Mound. No signage shall be placed in a location so as to affect vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The City of Mound reserves the right to modify sign placement in the field. 8. Signage placed outside of the City's approval of the temporary permit shall be subject to removal by the City. 9. The submittal of a Certificate of Insurance, naming the City of Mound as an additional insured , is required and shall be provided prior to the release and issuance of the Public Gathering Permit. Required insurance and coverage shall be in accordance with the City's established policies. Applicant to work with Finance Director Catherine Pausche regarding the form and required amounts for the Certificate of Insurance. 10. Applicant is advised that no special parking approvals in the park / launch area or on local streets are granted as part of the Council's approval of the Public Gathering Permit, with the exception of the trailer as described in Condition No. 3, 11. Applicant is advised that there are vehicle and trailer parking regulations on Bartlett Boulevard / County Road 125. 12. If different from the application, contact information, including name and cell phone number, for the person(s) who will be on site the day of the event shall be provided prior to the release of the Public Gathering Permit. i Page 2 -896- Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY TO $600/DAY* DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* _5'6 D *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Use �LO Area to be Used Time Frame /� a' e y �t Plft Intended Use W f <r Expected Art, Organization Representative's Name Addresss e (' fAitL r Aft ✓tovi Telephone No. Home:567 -357 —L l O 75G' °) 55"-!3 Drivers License Number Denartmeni City Clerk Police Dept. Park Dept_ Fire -Ml/ - PERMIT TO CONDUCT FISHING TOURNAMENT Permission is hereby granted to the individual and/or organization named below to conduct a fishing tournament under the provisions of this permit, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes and Rules. Name of Waters: Minnetonka Public Access to be used (See #5 on reverse Public Accesses on Lake Minnetonka Tournament Species: Largemouth & Smallmouth Bass Stations: Mound Bay Park .ofEntrants: Boats: TOURNAMENT DETAIL 14,729 Catch and Release Beginning Date: County: Hennepin X Yes Division No I.D. 27 -0133 200 100 May 30, 2015 1 May 30, 2015 Daily Fishing Hours Entry Fee per Individual Estimated Total Prize Value 7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. $350 $30,000 Additional Stipulations /Conditions: See Reverse Side. *The permittee shall submit a report on forams provided, to the Regional Fisheries Manager identified below, within 30 days after completion of the contest. Regional Office -CODv Distribution: • St. Paul Fisheries Office • Regional Fisheries Manager • Area Fisheries Supervisor • Area Trails & Waterways Supervisor • Area Conservation Osicer Regional Fisheries Mana -ger's Sig ture Date DNR Region 3 Fisheries Manager 1200 Warner Road St Paul Mn 55106 -6793 (651) 2.-0 no 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: April 22, 2015 Re: April 28, 2015 City Council Consent Agenda Item — Resolutions for Minor Subdivision/ and Variances for Property at 2201 Centerview Lane Summary. The City Council, at its June 10, 2014 meeting, adopted Resolution No. 14-39 and Resolution No. 14 -40 approving a 3 -lot minor subdivision and variances for the property at 2201 Centerview Lane. Following recording of the Resolutions at Hennepin County, Staff was recently notified of errors in the legal descriptions from the Hennepin County Recorder's Office regarding errors contained in the Resolutions that were prepared and provided by the surveyor. New resolutions have been prepared so that they may be recorded at Hennepin County to include the correct legal descriptions. Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the draft Resolutions reaffirming the Council's approval of the3 -lot minor subdivision and variances for the property at 2201 Centerview Lane, to include the corrected legal descriptions \ eo sFF � �r:a\ IRa� / O / m\ O xa a= � as °^ m is ! ey l` $9 / m '.;� 2 $y se• $ _ �'2s. it mry� o-3F aw 1A wt» nN �3. ON 60 Ca D Z m ° N C o Z h--r O p rrT jj nr zx N F o a o z I O O c m c p y m x $� '1'3 w 0 4 oa�� w o• n �J2 $ $ / °a° \ s9 0 �o x $;�s y �fi1 r-9- 20 vaar- a S Nm =mmo am to- 3 a� 11 A.,A EMT! c3m°yn 6b ^ \se °°°mn d.°°"4mm mm° "' v m an, too, m y o, m�omm3 x� 0 A„°, »O -ma oA 6av3 m_• ° O O "Zooms oo4- "30 NK .mm.m pem 3¢e. ma O a3 - a >O 03mm2vsN:m `- �.00M=m. o °O o Om � l o0 1SZS SSy-d• : J p qo^' S• y0 A '3am °q !. -J 3` 1 m Q a .5°aa w vn,0 "Ame "3� C i °Q �N q N�a 0— 4. 4.'^w ` 0 .awp OZZ5N2 jm \ a4 n➢ C1 4'i '°I ooA`n> °a vi nu, j J �qy G o°u'mm��3' ? °0 NQ 6a,R,8 °_� 6-3V.- c„- a°, PL i m4ad q'lo^vm'ow o m�' of mn.m°• a "v N " °mF 20 aaa^ 22 �O g °mmi: ?n- so,� -.at °1... 1. S� n p o yvo °aaD N o "m CP �. ~ s3 5 a3. 2m O yca 2pmIT m oho` a i o WO ysim °c� ao myc °, ym Z s o A p c ` O Ran 1,2 Q 2 1 s M- M 3 EMMA " l!"014012 � i�um.nF 3 = docn a' m g03 °'"1` <` 'a romt_« a m o>mav_v ro S'A °mmm�o o it 8 nOe s a m , °", A"o3 a uN g'3umaom n 9» {{,8mFs m° z -`om z =m a� m� mN$mm >m yZ E. _ p3m o xoavam4 d 3y."m 3,oS 'aS= _. m,uo. _ "r 3'8 e °a M m � m x%ann <<w q�5 m S 'a �s"m -3om m 'o ...�� anpHWO'm^ x Rnina m s „gym �6 �.g3 e MMz,m mau:r 3'fl� a g0000V0 . O j O O'V y ^Fa4�� o N m v N A A y A ij H a a n 1 ,PwP,aPm O n $ a m m s m D y A — - -[51n S11 °15'40'E - 196]es -0uitt yel P2 O j a wafeisemCP NO f 69 )r w am [=] o 9. Q V .o °r °g \ eo sFF � �r:a\ IRa� / O / m\ O xa a= � as °^ m is ! ey l` $9 / m '.;� 2 $y se• $ _ �'2s. it mry� o-3F aw 1A wt» nN �3. ON 60 Ca D Z m ° N C o Z h--r O p rrT jj nr zx N F o a o z I O O c m c p y m x $� '1'3 w 0 4 oa�� w o• n �J2 $ $ / °a° \ s9 0 �o x $;�s v P `°nmd C mgmc Aye /qx )t. 0 =2 >,,, p % Ag! m D P'z o n erg OA O oo4- � o Om � l o0 1SZS SSy-d• : J p qo^' S• � \ eo sFF � �r:a\ IRa� / O / m\ O xa a= � as °^ m is ! ey l` $9 / m '.;� 2 $y se• $ _ �'2s. it mry� o-3F aw 1A wt» nN �3. ON 60 Ca D Z m ° N C o Z h--r O p rrT jj nr zx N F o a o z I O O c m c p y m x $� '1'3 w 0 4 oa�� w o• n �J2 $ $ / °a° \ s9 0 �o x $;�s RESOLUTION NO 15 RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING RESOLUTION NO. 14 -39 APPROVING MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE AND CORRECTING CLERICAL ERRORS PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -06 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14 -39 on June 10, 2014 that approved a minor subdivision request for the property located at 2201 Centerview Lane; and WHEREAS, the legal descriptions provided by the surveyor in Resolution No. 14 -39 were recorded with the resolution and were incorrect; and WHEREAS, with the exception of the corrections to the legal descriptions, there are no other changes to the minor subdivision request; and WHEREAS, the new legal descriptions were provided by the surveyor and verified by Hennepin County and deemed acceptable; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound hereby reaffirms the adoption of Resolution No. 14 -39 that approved the minor subdivision subject to conditions, with the revised and corrected legal descriptions set forth in the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the City Attorney is authorized and directed to record this resolution on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of April 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -901- Exhibit A Existing Property Description: Lots 14, 19, 20, 21, and that part of Lot 15 lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly line of Lot 18, extended Northwesterly across said Lot 15, all in Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKE SIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject to easements of record. Containing 20,265 sq. ft. / 0.46 Acres +/- Proposed Parcel A: That part of Lots 14, 15, 19, and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKE SIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest comer of said Lot 14; thence South 60 degrees 12 minutes 23 seconds East, assumed bearing along the northeasterly line of said Lot 14, 85.44 feet. to the Northeast comer of said Lot 14; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lot 14, 23.40 feet; thence South 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 19, distant 80.00 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 19, as measured along said southwesterly line; thence North 60 degrees 15 minutes 17 seconds West, along said southwesterly line of Lot 19, and its northwesterly extension, 56.88 feet, to the West line of said Block 6; thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West, along said West line, 68.72 feet to the southeasterly line of Downs Ave., as dedicated in said plat; thence North 29 degrees 48 minutes 32 seconds East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 14, 40.01 feet to the point of beginning. Proposed Parcel B: Lot 21, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of Lot 20 in said plat described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 20; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northwesterly line of said Lot 20, 23.40 feet; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 20; thence North 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds East, along said southeasterly line, 24.15 feet to the Northeast comer of said Lot 20; thence North 60 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, along the northeasterly line of said Lot 20, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. Proposed Parcel C: That part of Lots 19 and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 20; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, 24.15 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lots 19 and 20, 75.73 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 19; thence North 60 degrees 15 minute 17 seconds West, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 19, 80.00 feet; thence North 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds East, 76.53 feet, to the West line of said Lot 20; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. -902- RESOLUTION NO 15- RESOLUTION REAFFIRMING RESOLUTON NO. 14 -40 APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE AND CORRECTING CLERICAL ERRORS PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -06 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14 -40 on June 10, 2014 that approved variances for the property located at 2201 Centerview Lane that received minor subdivision approval; and WHEREAS, the legal descriptions provided by the surveyor in Resolution No. 14 -40 were recorded with the resolution and were incorrect; and WHEREAS, with the exception of the corrections to the legal descriptions, there are no other changes to the variance request; and WHEREAS, the new legal descriptions were provided by the surveyor and verified by Hennepin County and deemed acceptable; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound hereby reaffirms the adoption of Resolution No. 14 -40 that approved the variances subject to conditions, with the revised and corrected legal descriptions set forth in the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FUTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the City Attorney is authorized and directed to record this resolution on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of April 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -903- Exhibit A Parcel A: That part of Lots 14, 15, 19, and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKE SIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest comer of said Lot 14; thence South 60 degrees 12 minutes 23 seconds East, assumed bearing along the northeasterly line of said Lot 14, 85.44 feet. to the Northeast corner of said Lot 14; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lot 14, 23.40 feet; thence South 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53 feet to a point on the southwesterly line of said Lot 19, distant 80.00 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 19, as measured along said southwesterly line; thence North 60 degrees 15 minutes 17 seconds West, along said southwesterly line of Lot 19, and its northwesterly extension, 56.88 feet, to the West line of said Block 6; thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West, along said West line, 68.72 feet to the southeasterly line of Downs Ave., as dedicated in said plat; thence North 29 degrees 48 minutes 32 seconds East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 14, 40.01 feet to the point of beginning. Parcel C: That part of Lots 19 and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said Lot 20; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, 24.15 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lots 19 and 20, 75.73 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 19; thence North 60 degrees 15 minute 17 seconds West, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 19, 80.00 feet; thence North 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds East, 76.53 feet, to the West line of said Lot 20; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner DATE: April 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 15 -05 Variance for Lakeside Deck Construction at 4917 Island View Drive SUMMARY The applicant, Sanderson Design Build LLC, has applied for a variance to allow a deck to be constructed on the lakeside of the home located at 4917 Island View Drive. The property is owned by BRADLEY! SKAPYAK ETAL and Matt and Kristin Skapyak reside at the property. Consent was received from Brad Skapyak for Matt Skapyak and Sanderson Design Build LLC to undertake the application was provided. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION The property is approximately 40' x 100' and abuts Island View Drive on the street side and abuts Devon Commons on the south side, which extends to Lake Minnetonka. Topography is varied in the subject vicinity and rises from the lake to the subject property. The applicant is proposing to construct a 28'x 10' deck (wooden frame with composite decking and rail) on the back side of the house, parallel to the side building lines. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their April 21, 2015 meeting. Staff commented that a letter of support the project was received from the abutting property owners at 4921 island View Drive and was provided to the Planning Commission and the applicant and resident who were both present at the meeting. Commissioner Smieja asked about the openings between deck boards and hardcover. Staff clarified that that open decks with 114 inch openings that do not have landscaping with plastic or concrete underneath do not count towards hardcover. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, subject to conditions, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. -905- RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR DECK CONSTRUCTION AT 4917 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE PLANNING CASE NO. 15 -05 WHEREAS, the applicant, Sanderson Design Build LLC, on behalf of the owners and residents, submitted a request for a variance to allow the construction of an open deck on the back/lakeside of the existing house at 4917 Island View Drive. The owner of the subject property provided written consent for the applicant and resident to undertake the application; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the home, which was built in 1978, does not currently have a deck in the subject location; and WHEREAS, the property is approximately 40'x 100' and abuts Island View Drive on the street side and abuts Devon Commons on the south side, which extends to Lake Minnetonka. Topography is varied in the subject vicinity and rises from the lake to the subject property. The applicant is proposing to construct a 28' x 10' deck (wooden frame with composite decking and rail) on the back side of the house, parallel to the side building lines; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) identifies the following criteria to be used when evaluating requests for variances: E. (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. WHEREAS, "practical difficulties" is defined in City Code Section 129 -2 as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the April 21, 2015 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its April 21, 2015 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the variance as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its April 28, 2015 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The applicant has minimized the variance as the proposed 28'x 10' deck is a reasonable size for use. 907- 3. The City has generally determined that a lakeside deck is a reasonable use for a residential lakeshore property and its construction will not alter the character of the surrounding neighborhood. 4. The house, which was constructed in 1953, was placed in a location on the lot that prevents the construction of a usable deck within the current setback regulations. 5. The proposed lakeside deck does not include stairs which minimizes bulk. 6. It is reasonable for a house that fronts the lake to include a lakeside deck to allow for full use and enjoyment. 7. A house with a lakeside deck is in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. ; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 7. Applicant is required to contact the MCWD related to permitting required for the project which must be completed prior to building permit issuance. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property on the attached Exhibit A. Adopted by the City Council this 28th of April 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Exhibit A .I MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 21. 2015 pert Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, and Pete Wiechert. Members absent: David Goode, Doug Gawtry, Jeffrey Bergquist, and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Mark Sanderson, 4917 Island View Drive; Brian Seidlitz, 2162 Cardinal Lane; Jim Brunzell, 5111 Windsor Road; Dan Sanden, 4505 West Branch Road; Bruce Stillman,2180 Cardinal Lane A. Variance PC Case No. 15 -02 Deck Construction 4917 Island View Drive Applicant: Sanderson Design Build Sarah Smith introduced the variance request. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow a deck on the lakeside of the home. The property abuts Devon Commons on the south side. The proposed deck meets the side setback requirement. The deck is proposed to be located 45.3 from the 929.4 OHWM requiring variance approval from the 50 foot setback. Staff is recommending approval of the variance request, subject to conditions 1 -7, as it meets the criteria for practical difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. Stone asked if the under deck was usable space. Smith indicated that it was. He also questioned if it could be enclosed. Smith said that it could be but it would require Planning Commission and Council review as well as a consideration of hardcover. MOTION by Stone, second by Smieja, to approve the variance with the recommended conditions 1 -7 and findings of fact 1 -7. MOTION carried unanimously. -9i1- April 20, 2015 Dear Ms. Smith, Per your notification, we fully support the Skaypak variance as requested. Thank you, Tom and Kim McReavy 4921 Island View Drive Mound -912- W DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director April 16, 2015 (Revised 4 -22 to correct clerical error) 15 -05 Variance Sanderson Design Build LLC (Mark Sanderson) 4917 Island View Drive (PID No. 25- 117 -24 -11 -0044) April 21, 2015 Low Density Residential R -1A Single Family Residential SUMMARY The applicant, Sanderson Design Build LLC, has applied for a variance to allow a deck to be constructed on the lakeside of the home located at 4917 Island View Drive. The property is owned by BRADLEYJ SKAPYAK ETAL and Matt and Kristin Skapyak reside at the property. Consent was received from Brad Skapyak for Matt Skapyak and Sanderson Design Build LLC to undertake the application was provided. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION The property is approximately 40'x 100' and abuts Island View Drive on the street side and abuts Devon Commons on the south side, which extends to Lake Minnetonka. Topography is varied in the subject vicinity and rises from the lake to the subject property. The applicant is proposing to construct a 28' x 10' deck (wooden frame with composite decking and rail) on the back side of the house, parallel to the side building lines. City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. -913- (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate accessto direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on March 25, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be March 26, 2015. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a courtesy informational letter and copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around April 16, 2015 to inform them of the variance request. -914- DECK SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Side setbacks ( if located behind the house) Rearsetback 4 feet Most restrictive of the following: 50 feet from 929.4 OHWM; or 10 feet from the property line; or 10 feet from top of bluff (if applicable) The proposed deck meets the side setback requirements. In this case, the most restrictive rear setback for the proposed deck is the 50 foot lakeshore setback requirement. As the deck is proposed to be located 45.3 feet from the 929.4 OHWM, variance approval is required for the project. STAFF /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Ray Hanson, Based on field inspection, the existing slope does not meet bluff Public Works criteria Superintendent Greg Pederson, No fire code or safety concerns on this project. Fire Chief Melissa Manderschied, The City will need to determine whether the applicant meets the City Attorney requirement of Section 129 -39 of the City Code. DISCUSSION Information on the hardcover calculation sheet that was submitted shows hardcover to be over the 40 percent allowance for properties with lot of record status. Members are advised that this information has not been field verified. Open decks that include 1/4 inch spacing do not count towards hardcover. Applicant is advised that the proposed project can result in no -net increase in hardcover. -915- ® Effective September 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others went into effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the City of Mound in August 2011. The applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the these regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. Previous information from the MCWD is that a deck construction project did require an erosion control permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the variance for deck construction for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 6. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 7. Applicant is required to contact the MCWD related to permitting required for the project which must be completed prior to building permit issuance. • . In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. The applicant has minimized the variance as the proposed 28'x 10' deck is a reasonable size for use. 3. The City has generally determined that a lakeside deck is a reasonable use for a residential Lakeshore property and its construction will not alter the character of the surrounding neighborhood. 4. The house, which was constructed in 1953, was placed in a location on the lot that prevents the construction of a usable deck within the current setback regulations. 5. The proposed lakeside deck does not include stairs which minimizes bulk. 6. It is reasonable for a house that fronts the lake to include a lakeside deck to allow for full use and enjoyment. A house with a lakeside deck is in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is Tuesday, April 28, 2015. -917- P� 00� -g�� n 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX952- 472 -0620 • 1111 D Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. ' Planning Commission Date _ N-4 y 5' !S' Case No. �� 15 City Council Date �1 o�C^ If SUBJECT Address_ /�sL/i�✓%� PROPERTY LEGAL Lot / Block 14-1 DESC. Subdivision PID # Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 E31 82 B3 (circle one) PROPERTY Name Email 11f9i%7/t-`W . S *�- OWNER " Address�17 Phone Home (; /o? It/ 7 ork Fax APPLICANT Name rfN a4Y" &t,9 "c- Email WVx"k4Fe�ni{rv�Ytw�resri (IF OTHER At ;f1V10 THAN Address-1 ;Z /dam/°, 4-vC - -;%/fT �?y OWNER) I Phone 3 3Eh d r%� Work P fed 4?33'4'(>7/ 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedun for this property? Yes ( ) No k ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of `p�roopposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): S, Variance Information (1/2/2015) Page 4 of 6 V✓� t� C-� �n 63'4 - 06- ©= ft 0oi c &%.I Case No. k;_65 5 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (S2) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED (or existing) Front Yard: (B)S E(9Y) ft. p?n' (0 ft. Side Yard: (as ew ) ft. s ft. Side Yard: ( E420) ft. 6, � ft. JW Rear Yard: (Ne &) ft. ft. Lakeside: ( �� ) ft. 54'5' -3 ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft 3q 9 sq ft Hardcover., sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes 6'Q, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow (� too small (�} too shallow Please describe: Variance Information (1/212015) Page 5 of 6 S` ( ) topography O soil ( ) drainage (jCjexisting situation 0-4). shape () other: specify f rya.- � - /v-))�� r •� �•,��yc.s tea., , �5 6✓GjQ�l GL L�Jr Gj�s t. C°S -919- :j 6. Case No._ 15=65 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes p§, No 0, If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (>J. If yes, explain: S. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (S�), No { ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? U x. 10 I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature Variance Information- (1/212015) Page 6 of 6_ . -920- Date Date 3: 2 Y , IS- r T HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS __,_r'17Y OF MOUND (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: 'M7 Zs� UI € -L41 Lg- OWNER'S NAME: &I'l-Ttj e-w 5-k4i-p 'Y- 04-e.. LOT AREA 2 -'V� SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... l/ � �/• LOT AREA -3 41� SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. ' Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 123385 (see track). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official, LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X Z?7 •` = C1 r �g DETACHED BUILDINGS (GARAGE /SHED) TOTAL HOUSE... ....... ................. .................. X = X TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... DRIVEWAY, PARKING _ _ X = �� AREAS, SIDEWALKS, i5 ETC. 2P1 GLj. X C;/ 7 A4 ^'J6 44 "- X 60 TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ..... . .................... -- ......... DECKS Open decks (1/4' min ;L3- X Opening between boards) With a pervious surface under are not X = counted as hardcover. X = TOTAL DECK .....-- ............... ............................... X= X = TOTALOTHER ..................... ............................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE— ... - .................. .............. ...... — UNDER/ OVER (indicate difference) ..................................... ............................... Revised 1110 -922- l`/! 3__ ;-y- 0 �273K DATE Executive Summary • u." so 1 TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 15 -07 Variance for New House Construction in a Bluff at 5103 Windsor Road PID No. 25- 117 -24 -12 -0206 REQUEST SUMMARY The applicants, Daniel and Laura Sanden, have applied for a variance to allow the construction of a new house and detached garage on the vacant property. The 16,000 square foot property is located on the south side of Windsor Road, east of Tuxedo Boulevard. The property is impacted by bluffs, wetlands, and shoreland. The applicants received a variance to construct a one -story walkout and detached garage in 2013. At that time, only a site plan was submitted as the applicants wanted to be sure that the City would grant a variance to build in the bluff since the bluff area encompassed the entire property. Since that variance was approved, the applicants have completed detailed building plans for the site. The proposed plans are for a 2 -story home with a walk -out basement. Staff has determined that a new /replacement variance is needed as the home proposed is different than was originally described in the 2013 variance. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their April 21, 2015 meeting. The Planning Commission requested clarification on why sanitary sewer clean outs were needed. Staff was unable to answer for the Planning Commission but has clarified that it is being required because the sewer service line is going to be almost 90 feet in length; the line has minimal grade with several possible bends; and the number of trees on the property will likely result in a tree root infiltrating the sewer line at some point in the future. -923- A neighbor expressed concern about the project as it is going to be located close to his property. The Planning Commission discussed this concern noting that the home is in the same general location as was previously identified though it will be two stories instead of one story. The Planning Commission noted that the applicant has minimized the variances requested to only a bluff setback variance and without that variance a home cannot be built on that property. After discussion, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously for approval of the variance. The draft minutes have been included for your reference. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. -924- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR NEW HOUSE CONSTRUCTION AT 5103 WINDSOR ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 15 -07 WHEREAS, the applicants, Daniel and Laura Sanden, have applied for a variance to the bluff setback requirement in order to build a two -story walkout house and detached 2 -car garage at 5103 Windsor Road; and WHEREAS, the name of the road that fronts the subject property on the north side is called "Windsor Place" in the original plat of Whipple but was renamed, and is most commonly referred to, as "Windsor Road "; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 16,000 square foot property has not been previously developed; and WHEREAS, in addition to the standard setback requirements of the R -1A zoning district, the applicants are required to meet minimum setbacks to an adjacent wetland, the ordinary high water line and unimproved / undeveloped roads; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the property has a bluff as is defined in City Code Section 129 -2: Bluff means topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having all of the following characteristics: (1) Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high -water level of the water body; (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high -water level averages 30 percent or greater; and (4) The slope must drain toward the water body. EM WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -385 (d) (1) (c) requires a 10 foot setback from the top of the bluff for all structures except stairways and landings; and -925- WHEREAS, the bluff extends almost completely across the property from the southeast to the northeast significantly reducing the buildable area of the lot; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking to construct the home and garage on the property with the following minimal standards: Lot I Required Proposed /Existing Variance Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 16,000 sq. ft. Lot Depth 40 feet 80 feet Lot Depth 80 feet 160 feet Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 6,400 sq, ft. 2,394 sq. ft. House Front Yard (north - Windsor) 20 feet 50+ feet Rear Yard (south) 15 feet 64.8 feet Side Yard (west) 6 feet 6 feet Side Yard (east) 10 feet 27.5 feet Lakeshore ( east/southeast) 50 feet 50.2 feet Wetland Setback (east/southeast) 25 feet +/- 33 feet Bluff Setback (east/southeast) 10 feet 0 10 feet Garage Front Yard (north - Windsor) 20 feet 20.3 feet Side Yard (west) 6 feet 2 1. 8 feet Side Yard (east) 10 feet 36.1 feet ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. -926- (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, in identifying the buildable area of the lot the applicants have sought to minimize their request to only a bluff setback variance; and WHEREAS, the proposed development of the property as a residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the April 21, 2015 meeting, as well as in the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its April 21, 2015 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of recommending approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance at its April 28, 2015 meeting; and determined that approval would allow the property to develop in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99. -927- ; and PLOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the bluff setback variance with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Approval of the drainage plans, utility plans and proposed grades by the City Engineer. 5. Sanitary sewer clean outs need to be installed between the house and the street. 6. Building height of the proposed structures shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 7. Eaves shall extend no more than two (2) feet into the required yard areas. 8. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process. 9. No buildings or structures shall be constructed within the 25 foot wetland buffer area. 10. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback, 25 foot wetland buffer, public right -of -way, or 100 -year floodplain area(s). 11. The finished floor elevation of the home and garage shall be constructed at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation of 933.0 feet. 12. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 13. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 14. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 15. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In approving the requested variance, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The development of the site for residential purposes is in keeping with how it was zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan. 3. The variance is requested due to existing site characteristics that were not created by the applicant. 4. The extent of the bluff results in the entire site being unbuildable without a variance. 5. The applicant has minimized the variances needed for the development of the site to bluff setback requirement. 6. The development of a residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. -929- The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property on the attached Exhibit A. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of April 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -930- Wegsheid, Mayor Exhibit A -931- ►1 > , ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, and Pete Wiechert. Members absent: David Goode, Doug Gawtry, Jeffrey Bergquist, and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Mark Sanderson, 4917 Island View Drive; Brian Seidlitz, 2162 Cardinal Lane; Jim Brunzell, 5111 Windsor Road; Dan Sanden, 4505 West Branch Road; Bruce Stillman,2180 Cardinal Lane B. Variance PC Case No. 15 -07 New House 5103 Windsor Road Applicant: Dan and Laura Sanden Rita Trapp introduced the variance request. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow a new house and detached garage on the property. The property is impacted by bluffs, wetlands, and shoreland. In 2013, a variance was approved for construction in a bluff with a general site plan. Since then, the applicants have completed detailed building plans for the site. This variance is needed as the home now includes a deck that does not meet the bluff setback. Staff is recommending approval of the variance request, subject to conditions 1 -14, as it meets the criteria for practical difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. Jim Brunzell (5111 Windsor Rd) expressed concern that their houses were going to be really close. The height will have a big impact on the neighborhood. He will be able to look right into their bedroom windows. Smieja asked what the wetland delineation was for. Trapp indicated it would show exactly where the wetland is. He asked about the sanitary sewer cleanouts (condition No. 4). Trapp responded that it was a condition suggested by Public Works and would be addressed as part of the building permit approvals. Stone asked if here was enough space between the properties so that trees could be planted to buffer between the houses. (28) 932- A discussion ensued regarding the building height as well as the proximity of the neighbor's house from the first plan to the current one. It was stated by staff that both building height and setbacks to the neighbor's lot lines will be maintained within code requirements. Smieja restated that the variance allows construction of this house on the lot. Trapp said that the only variance is bluff setback. Everything else will conform to code. Baker asked if the overhang issue should be in the conditions. Trapp said that it will be addressed in the building permit review and it has to conform to regulations. Smieja, although he understands the issues that Mr. Brunzell brought up, the variance is just to allow construction; all else is conforming. It makes sense to recommend approval. MOTION by Smieja, second by Wiechert, to approve the variance in accordance with recommended conditions 1 -14 and findings of fact 1 -6. MOTION carried unanimously. -933- Subject: Additional Information Request as requested in 4/16/15 from City of Mound (RE Determination of Completeness - Variance Application) The reason project cannot meet code is described in previous Variance Application and current Variance Application. Only code the proposed project does not meet is Bluff Set back requirements. It is the intention to comply with all other city code as proposed in the Variance Application. Application of the City Code for Bluff setback requirements imposes a practical difficulty because the majority of the residential lot is within the city code bluff setback requirement due to the circumstances unique to the property which includes being within a "Bluff" designation. If this code is strictly applied, the lot would not be a buildable lot for residential purposes, which is a reasonable use of the land as the lot is designated a residential lot per City of Mound. Additionally, the proposed building of a two story house and detached garage is not out of the "essential character" of the neighborhood whereby other similar houses exist and many are within defined "bluff" areas on The Island. Economic considerations for the owners are also are important and would cause the owners financial hardship due to purchasing the land in 2012, whereby an initial Variance passing was a contingent part of the purchase of the property and this second Variance is not significantly different than the first request and actually improves on a reduced impact and footprint to the land. If you have any questions. Please feel free to inquire. Thanks, Dan /Laura sanden -934- .: , TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director April 15, 2015 15 -07 Variance Daniel and Laura Sanden 5103 Windsor Road (PID No. 25- 117 -24 -12 -0206) April 21, 2015 Low Density Residential R -1A Single Family Residential H The applicants, Daniel and Laura Sanden, have applied for a variance to allow the construction of a new house and detached garage on the vacant property. The 16,000 square foot property is located on the south side of Windsor Road, east of Tuxedo Boulevard. The property is impacted by bluffs, wetlands, and shoreland. The applicants received a variance to construct a one -story walkout and detached garage in 2013. At that time, only a site plan was submitted as the applicants wanted to be sure that the City would grant a variance to build in the bluff since the bluff area encompassed the entire property. Since that variance was approved, the applicants have completed detailed building plans for the site. The proposed plans are for a 2- story home with a walk -out basement. Staff has determined that a new /replacement variance is needed as the home proposed is different than was originally described in the 2013 variance. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or -935- buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, 'Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on March 27, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be March 30, 2015. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a courtesy informational letter and copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around April 16, 2015 to inform them of the variance request. SITE INFORMATION The property is located on Windsor Road east of Tuxedo Boulevard. The property is bordered by unimproved portions of Waterbury Road and Cobden Lane. It is also adjacent to a wetland that has an open channel connection to Phelps Bay. The 16,000 square foot property has not been previously developed and will be accessed from Windsor Road. The applicants are proposing a two -story walk out home with a two -car detached garage. -936- Lot Required Proposed /Existing Variance Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 16,000 sq. ft. - Lot Depth 40 feet 80 feet - Lot Depth 80 feet 160 feet - Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 6,400 sq. ft. 2,394* sq. ft. - House Front Yard (north - Windsor) 20 feet 50+ feet - Rear Yard (south) 15 feet 64.8 feet - Side Yard (west) 6 feet 6 feet - Side Yard (east) 10 feet 27.5 feet - Lakeshore (east /southeast) 50 feet 50.2 feet - Wetland Setback (east /southeast) 25 feet +/- 33 feet - Bluff Setback (east /southeast) 10 feet 0 10 feet Garage Front Yard (north - Windsor) 20 feet 20.3 feet Side Yard (west) 6 feet 21.8 feet Side Yard (east) 10 feet 36.1 feet *Hardcover will need to be verified through building permit process STAFF /CONSULTANT /AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Lauren Sampedro, One or more MCWD permits will be required. Based on materials MCWD submitted, it appears that erosion control, wetland protection, and floodplain alteration may be triggered. A wetland buffer meeting MCWD regulations for the delineated wetland will be needed. Applicant is directed to apply for a Water Resources Permit. Ray Hanson, Sanitary sewer clean -outs will need to be installed between the Public Works house and the street. Superintendent Dan Faulkner, Drainage plans, utility plans and proposed grades will need to be City Engineer reviewed and approved the City Engineer. Greg Pederson, No fire code or safety concerns on this project. Fire Chief -937- Melissa Manderschied, The City will need to determine whether the applicant meets the City Attorney requirement of Section 129 -39 of the City Code. DISCUSSION A new /replacement variance is being requested as the applicant has changed the design of the home from a one -story walkout to a two -story walkout. At the time the 2013 variance was granted, the applicant had not yet completed house designs as they wanted to be sure the City would allow the construction of a home in the bluff. The applicant is proposing to reduce the footprint of the home from 1,242 square feet to 960 square feet. The total square feet of the home will rise though due to the addition of the second floor. Based on the application materials submitted, the proposed home will be 2,880 square feet rather than 2,482 square feet as proposed in 2013. The orientation of the home on the property has also changed from the 2013 variance application. The axis of the home as currently proposed is northwest to southeast, previously it was southwest to northeast. The proposed two -car garage has been shifted towards the center of the lot. in 2013 the garage was proposed to be about 7 feet from the side property line. it is now proposed to be 21 feet away. This shift to the east means the garage is having a greater impact on the bluff area than was originally proposed. To the east of the property is the undeveloped Cobden Lane. City Code Section 129 -197 (k) states that unimproved street frontages having a width exceeding 15 feet shall be considered side yards and have a minimum setback of 10 feet. The applicant has shown the 10 foot setback required. A wetland delineation was approved by Mark Perry, the City's wetland consultant from Bolton and Menk on August 13, 2012. According to Mark Perry, the wetland delineation is valid for five years. The wetland edge, shown on the survey, is located on the east /southeast side of the property. A 25 foot buffer from the edge of the wetland was shown on the survey. According to the submitted plans, the applicant will not be building within the wetland buffer area. Applicant and members are advised that the MCWD is responsible for permitted related wetlands protection; also floodplain alteration and erosion control. Refer to preliminary comments from the MCWD in the Staff /Consultant /Agency Review section earlier in the Planning Report. The applicant has minimized the variance requests to a bluff setback variance. City Code Section 129 -385 (d) (1) (c) requires a 10 foot setback from the top of the bluff for all structures except stairways and landings. City Code Section 129 -1 provides the following definition for a bluff: Bluff means topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having all of the following characteristics: (1) Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high -water level of the water body; (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high -water level averages 30 percent or greater; and (4) The slope must drain toward the water body. As shown on the survey, it has been determined that this property contains a bluff. The bottom of the slope is shown extending from along the southeast edge of the property. The slope is 33% from the toe of the bluff to the point 25 feet above the ordinary high water level. Thus, the applicants would not be able to build within the property if required to meet the minimum bluff setback of 10 feet. Hardcover calculations will need to be verified during the building permit process. Preliminary calculations provided by the applicant indicate that the house, garage, driveway, and walk connections will be well under the 40% maximum allowed by a lot of record. The applicant is advised that the amount that retaining walls count towards the hardcover allowance depends on its design. Similarly, the deck will qualify as hardcover if the slats are less than % apart and /or there is an impervious material underneath. Staff requested the applicant provide a Building Height Calculation Form and supporting information was provided to the City on April 15th and is currently under review. Staff has identified as a condition that the building height will be no more than 35 feet as allowed by code. It is recommended that the applicant review the definition of building height relative to the shed roof that is proposed. The applicant is advised that City Code Section 129 -197 limits the encroachments of eaves to 2 feet in the required yard setback areas. The building plans submitted seem to indicate that the roof will extend farther into the setback areas and will need to be revised. Section 113 -53 (b) (4) states that all structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation, which for Lake Minnetonka is 933.0 feet. The proposed lower level for the home is at 947.0, while the garage is at 960.0 -939- STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the variance for the bluff setback for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. A Sanitary sewer clean outs need to be installed between the house and the street. 5. Approval of the drainage plans, utility plans and proposed grades by the City Engineer. 6. Building height of the proposed structures shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 7. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process. 8. No buildings or structures shall be constructed within the 25 foot wetland buffer area. 9. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT lakeshore setback, 25 foot wetland buffer, public right -of -way, or 100 -year floodplain area(s). 10. The finished floor elevation of the home and garage shall be constructed at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation of 933.0 feet. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 12. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. .,l 13. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 14. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The development of the site for residential purposes is in keeping with how it was zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan. The variance is requested due to existing site characteristics that were not created by the applicant. 4. The extent of the bluff results in the entire site being unbuildable without a variance. 5. The applicant has minimized the variances needed for the development of the site to bluff setback requirement. 6. The development of a residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is Tuesday, April 28, 2015. ., Mar, 21. 2015 8:14AM No. 0806 P, 1 RE: Supplemental Narrative for Variance Application Property: XXX Windsor Road, Mound Mn property Owners: Daniel & Laura Sanden At the request of the City of Mound, we are providing a supplemental narrative to accompany the Variance Application. This is the second Variance Application for this property with the first application being approved and filed in 2013. Property.is located wholly within a "bluff' area as designated by the City of Mound. The property is located on an extremely challenging terrain which, as a result, in combination with being designated within a "bluff' area, has not been developed for its intended residential purpose (RIA), Asa result of being within a "bluff' area, required setbacks make the property currently "unbuildable" without variance approval. Variance as noted has been approved and filed as noted in 2013. Request is to build a residential house (up to a two -story home with basement and/or walkout basement) with a potentially detached garage, to be occupied by the applicants. As depicted in the site plans, all other required setbacks will continue to be met in the project, including wetland setbacks. Also, in order to reduce impact to the site and respect the natural flow of the land, this particular plan was chosen to allow for reduced land fill and to allow the house portion of the project to follow with the natural flow of the land, reducing fill and alteration to the Iand. The noted one -story w/ walkout basement (initial) versus up to two -story house with basement or with/walk out basement is different than the originally described property in the initial approved Variance Application in 2013 and the reason for a need fnr Variance per the City of Mound. The building footprint of the newly proposed house will be reduced per comparing Hardcover Calculations from the original approved footprint, the proposed building will continue remain within City Code for two -story housing, while the two -story in nature build is comparable to other two- .story houses in the neighborhood. The impact of this newly requested design will reduce overall impact to the land. It should be noted, we do not feel Variance Approval should be required to be completed a second time which may delay building and will add additional cost to the owners, However, we will work with the City to come to a mutual/quirk resolution while requesting the City provides timely review of this application so as to not delay the proposed build. We respectfully request to move forward with this project as requested, while working with the City of Mound. We thank you for your help during this project to date, and look forward to partnering with the City to develop a property which has been undeveloped for sometime. We look forward to answering any additional questions you may have. Thank you, Dan & Laura Sanden -942- 03/27/2015 8:I8AM (GMT- 05:00) Mar. 27, 2015 8 :15AM 2. No, 0806 P, 2 AFL) VARIANCE APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55384 Phone 852 -472 -0600 FAX 952472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. _ City Council Date Please type or erint legibly SUBJECT Address t xkx11 1.+)r'r�Sdr b-i' � PROPERTY Lot ! iq a� 4 oZU1 LEGAL I 1 ! a Block Olt DESC. Nc�t- to f Subdivision i r o� iFn /�1��¢ PlD# _` (•% -�y -!,� '"0> 0� zoning: R1 (o L R3 B9 82 53 poleune) PROPERTY OWNER APPLICANT (IF OTHER THAN OWNER) Name 6 A a.l o, Lww^g S�rJgi, Email Address lS`DS' Wald i.n.cj, R04 . i9rJ�6 , ohoCr $:S %vy Phone Nome o "T." ,t Work I91d.�P�S,If10fot Fax �&6- T7A-S285 Name Email Phone Home work FSK Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning prooedi, for this property? Yes W No ( ). if yes, list date($) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. ii a�daw,5. Variance Iniarmatiort (1r71201�) Pa904 or ti #cN 0. d- `r -y t jl, .Ika4 4tq4- ,j#,4, -943- 03/27/201.5 8:18AM (GMT- 05:00) Mar,21 2015 8:15AM Case No. No, 0606 P, 3 3. Do the existing structures comply whh ail area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes M No ( ). if no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, eto,); I VO�.K +AA.ir,4 S�/ctGi4tYQ,ir h1 {� Pro $1M.�*'4,f W1l1 l.ant �� unfL. 6 $ETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE %, b4 (S-A m&h 91-* ley for ®1(isGRg) YCAA4Wt6 �`,� (y�N�� Front Yard: (n)5 E W) �10^ ft. ?Q _ ft. ft, Side Yard: (N S E L2 _ ft, ft. ft, Side Yarn: ( N sl :) R ) /© ft, ft, ft. Rear Yard: ( N/S W } IS ft. _ 15 ft. ft. Lakeside: { N SD) ---- jo ft. L! ft. "" ft, t� ��"� cwi) (Qfi ) "": ( N S&V } r_ c.�� ft. ft. ft, Street Frontage` YO ft, •— ft, "`°— ft. Lot Sae: lrY O ODPJ sq ft 2(v,__,,,,J000 sq sq ft Hardcover: { (o} �: cca ai b X) sq ft fft asq Tr sq ft +r, 4, Does the pra�sea nl l u70 se of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes p, No ( ). if no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable ase for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district?. ( ) too narrow topography {)soil too small () drainage amsting situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape other. specify Please de//scrrbe: (-1) toP ©/q�QTf atic� L` n6KP�!/ iic w�n (S-A m&h 91-* ley A-at YCAA4Wt6 �`,� z0 } �Y7M 6B �1g W i+� 11*dUE.� /' 7D 1� 1�� r'r a4 j{.. [ 0"tix✓iWf `tkj /�P bk(ldsrf D (9'IS H i e /( M �c vtieer Z4A ule t 01 .. A 1030 Gr p t(rnrae 4(tn ml)"e i,kj 4sal Spc�; �o�s,r. C9.�G`r'Q,�ty','j' I'T,+,+� b"�•�+F, 'Y �1iGtJ`2l`1 r variance Infonation (uncis) Page 5 of 6 .# Tfr{wo-a' q..•1:w1v -944- 03/27/2015 8:18AM (GMT - 05:00) Mar. 27, 2015 8:15AM No, 0806 P, 4 Case No, B. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action ofarjYone having property Interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1882)? Yes (), No , . If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes( ),No (X). If yes, explain: 8, Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance pecWiar only to the property described in this petition? .Yes (, ), No}(.�. If no, list some other properties whichOat& similarly affected? P�061+A�] -..,tl Y�� fiCi.y� ry tJ'�"ur�1K r0'Jr0�3\JYr'w R hC bHE �Y 'Th10 S}yPZZ iIaF.PY ltCCV>'f�� 1'U � `� R ,�U�d CG�+�4 .h+.'SdN1 f✓'w., c� �o.a nsl�(l�y, fo7�,r ON k R F7 0 ,,y fMlr✓j'��r 0.,*`d 1JLn M� 0'K fr 5I11pJ t kn'441 9r JkJ OVWid a�' M eaP /� Ma12 l'V�e r' a.r� v e a' }wn -s }a y �Wwc 414, b r'-- -- Prom �4rn h f �YC�d t�4R ni(L A� i[ . iN JL. 'rl U�ufi! S�T75G� ONtjW,k5- `ML t)s`� 6 ckx v iA11art cigd R1F�nscl��c1kl 411 e�v(„,t.1_. ufl6< et,ute�f '&A "cc�'�:gt�. ti Lt L wwr q�/q�nz1 iin'or• yiwtaa�cr. keu`�rJ 1b b {1A 44;w4le In alw -rivey ..1((�� wi1t, .a�) g euiu4r- r{(�{{L,r• W1 crv.i,., c 7D s' 1."A 6 44)i ow n5 V Y n� &t 1 d 4Vi1 t 0..t 1 + r..:nl��.✓ fa, J.r.p4Lc in fit. r..,d i8,. 'W�A ,rpw-J4e4 A+ae 4v aicwt41, -J 1OJt "' I certify that all of the above statemen s 21 he,tat en contained in an� required pagers or plans to be 02r , d submitted herewith are true and accurate, I acknowledge that J have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized G off dal of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such c y Jcw %3s� r notices as may be required by low, Owner's Signature Applicant`s Signature Date variance Information (1/212095) Page 6 018 -945- 03/27/2015 8:18AM (GMT- 05:00) Mar, 27, 2015 8:16 -0 No. 0806 P, 5 HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS u • • US SURFACE COVERA PROPERTYADDESS: XXX Vi tJsor Regt� OWNER'SNAME; kla 4 6r ar Sun6$n LOT AREA ` — SQ. FT, X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... LOT AREA (, k, 0 00 . SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. y 0 a Existing Lots of Reoord may have 40 percent coverage provided that te"iquas are dItzed, as outlined In Zoning Ordinance Section 129.385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approowd by the Building Ofrid'al. LENGTH WIDTH SO FT HOUSE x a_ _m = quo '— x TOTALOTHER ..................... ............................... � 3 q q TOTAL HARDCOVER IMPERVIOUS SURFACE..,.. ....... ......... __ ................ 651ER (indicate differs oe) ....... ...... ..... ............................. ....................W714 / PREPARED BY DATE Rovised 1110 -946- 03/27/2015 8:10AM (GMT- 05:00) TOTAL HOUSE.. ____ ....... ........ ........... q(00 DETACHED BUILDINGS a H X 7C, (GARAGE /SHED) TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS— ...— ...................... DRIVEWAY,PARK{NG c%I X AREAS, SIDEWALKS, �� x K = i� ETC. x �,,o 7p TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........ . ............. ...... ....... ..:.. DECKS open decks (114' min. 10 X 4 = 1 �� Opening between boards) With a X = pervious surface under are not , counted as hardcover. TOTAL DECK_. ......... ......... ....... ...... I ko x x _.. TOTALOTHER ..................... ............................... � 3 q q TOTAL HARDCOVER IMPERVIOUS SURFACE..,.. ....... ......... __ ................ 651ER (indicate differs oe) ....... ...... ..... ............................. ....................W714 / PREPARED BY DATE Rovised 1110 -946- 03/27/2015 8:10AM (GMT- 05:00) Mar,27, 2015 8:16AM CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) No. 0606 P, 6 i• 1, the undersigned, being duly qualified and the Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1, As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which the attached was extracted. 2. 1 have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3, 1 find said extract to be a true, correct and complete extract from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on the date indicated in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: M WN:t4*11111111 Lola e NO, 26-117-24-12-0206) Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on the 23RD day of April, 2013. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of'sald City, this 9" "day of May, 2011 Catherine Pausche, Clerk "047- 03/27/2015 8:18AM (GMT-05:00) Mar, 27. 2015 8:16AM RESOLUTION NO. 13-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY ATOM WINDSOR LANE (PID NO. 2r-117-24-12-0206) No, 0806 P. 7 WHEREAS, the applicants, Daniel and Laura Sanden, have applied for a variance to the bluff setback requirement in order to build a one -story walkout house and detached 2-car garage; and WHEREAS, the property Is located on Windsor Lane In the R -1A single- family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 16,000 square foot property has not been previously developed; and WHEREAS, in addition to the standard setback requirements of the R -1A zoning district, the applicants are required to meet minimum setbacks to an adjacent wetland and the ordinary high water line; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the property has a bluff as is defined in City Code Section 129 -2: Bluff means topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having all of the following characteristics: (i) Part or all. of the feature is located in a •shoreland,area; (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high -water level of the water body; (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high -water level averages 30 percent or greater; and (4) The slope must drain toward the water body. and WHEREAS, City Code Section 929 -385 (d) (1) (c) requires a 10 foot setback from the top of the bluff for all structures except stairways and landings; and -948- 03/27/2015 8 :18AM (GMT- 05:00) Mar. 27. 2015 8 :17AM No. 6806 P, 8 WHEREAS, the bluff extends almost completely across the property from the southeast to the northeast significantly reducing the buildable area of the tot; and WHEREAS, the applicant is'seeking to construct the home and garage on the property with the following minimal standards: . ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which Is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner In the use of the owners land, No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub, 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and -949- 03/27/2015 8:18AM (GMT- 05:00) Required. proposed/Existing Variance Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft 15,000 sq. ft Lot Width 40 feet 80 feet Front Yard (north - Windsor) 20 Teet 20 feet Pear Yard (south) 15 feet 15 feet Side Yards (west) 6 feet 6 feet Side Yard (east) 10 feet 10 feet Lakeshore (east/southeast) 50 feet 50 feet Wetland Setback (east/southeast) 25 feet 25 feet Bluff Setback (east/southeast) 10 feet tl 10 feet Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 8,400 sq. ft. 3,480 sq, tt. ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which Is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner In the use of the owners land, No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub, 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and -949- 03/27/2015 8:18AM (GMT- 05:00) Mar. 27, 2015 8,17AM No. 0806 P, 9 WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec, 129 -2, °PracticalOftulties° is defined as follows: Practical Difficuldes, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner Is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual Jot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems, ;and WHEREAS, In identifying the buildable area of the lot the applicants have sought to minimize their request to only a bluff setback variance; and WHEREAS, the proposed development of the property as a residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the April 16, 2013 meeting, as well as in the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission et its April 15, 2013 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted unanimously in favor of recommending approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance at Its April 23, 2013 meeting; and determined that approval would allow the property to develop in a reasonable manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound dues hereby approve the bluff setback variance with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -950- 03/27/2015 8.18AM (GMT- 05:00) Mar.27, 2015 8,17AM No. 0806 P, 10 2, No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Approval of the drainage plans, utility plans and proposed grades by the City Engineer. 5. Building height of the proposed structures shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 8, Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 400A of the site, 7. No buildings or structures shall be constructed within the 25 footwetland buffer area. 8. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 50 -FT Lakeshore setback, 25 foot wetland buffer, public right -of -way, or 100- yearfloodplain area(s). 9. The finished floor elevation of the home and garage shall be constructed at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation of 933.0 feet. 1 o.Appiicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 11.The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant Is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met, 12. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 13, Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, fioodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant Is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. -951- 03/27/2015 8:18AM (GMT - 05:00) Mar, 27, 2015 8:18AM No. 0806 P, 11 In approving the requested variance, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 128-39 (a) are being met. 2. The variance is requested due to existing site characteristics that were not created by the applicant. 3. The extent of the bluff results in the entire site being generally unbuildable without a variance. 4. The applicant has minimized the variances needed for the development of the site to bluff setback requirement. 5. The development of a residential home will be in character with.the surrounding neighborhood. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: Lots 1, 2, 24, 25, and 26, Block 17, WHIPPLE, Hennepin County. Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council this 23n4 day of April 2013. Mark Han us, A�ayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -952 03/2702015 8:18AM (GMT- 05:00) Ma r. 27. 2015 8:18AM No. 0806 P. 12 l ' III Doc No T05576355 Certified, filed and/or recorded on He$ rte Mies I Treasurer Kg 10 871753M $46.00 $2.00 $20.00 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. 568.00 953- 03/27/2015 8:18AM (GMT-05:00) € I 8 ----------------------- 4 ------------------------ i h_ 1 I I a , v �j a _ I I Rig- - ? r .. `.. A ,€t €— ^ `4a RIP ?g a3 q 8 B4® 11 flu it (� as g •a qa a � � :� � €i � afe 0 b ' III :r g[aa -954- i a P Ul E 1 1 j 4�,a LFi, . MGE„ DEN RE5IDEN05 TITLE SHEET g s3 n, �A HE owmvc o nes .�,�..>wo,a. o ov��,.�., A' � �LJLJ MGE SANDEN RESIDENCE ommxo s oes�ux nouxc. �� ,x >��. �... v. I m m c 170" TLOOR TRU54E4 ZI I A r ID Z E S J ❑LIj NN J t PA i I I � 1 I rrr i I � I o # i I I ryryryccc I g I I �qqq I� 3� r I °z TP i b'b 1IB" I. �� fl —� o i BENGNI0008Y $ �Tw: N � I _ /sL4H p � GLOSET m conr � w _ by OZ rv� 1IT 4'-0 iR" 11 d D'd —2; MG owM snesvcv SANDEN ftE5IDENGE .a.MAIN LEVEL PLAN ' n c �.. 957 RIBµorznmwaxocs r---------------------------- - - - - -� F MGE u.+ SANDEN RE5IDENGE UPPER LEVEL PLAN � DAR& I 55' -012° H' -1112" I I 106 ®mbmm I n® -_IN ERGYrRV55E5 I SPAGE01'- 4'O.L. I 3A i I I � � I I I I � I i I Iro AZ t-9 d4 I CLOSET m I R I A ! N I I I I � I d A l aoser I Ic a i J ® A 4 I ( � I I I I lop z 5 z I l'A— — _ — —4'-i — 11 — 4— — — RIBµorznmwaxocs F MGE u.+ SANDEN RE5IDENGE UPPER LEVEL PLAN � DAR& „� 5 r 4 � z 4� o w .w.a,ov M.1w, exvc,.i.u. c °o "r Of D u p�MGE scu 5ANOEN RE5iDENGE LOWER LEVEL PLAN a3 � if e Fl +m 4 Z m 4 y 4 O z p MC oynax 5ANDEN RE5IDENOE I ELEVATION5 uff � �g - 0 I m� N O m =.m S b z >o �P P El y � � a o�MGE�s`N SANDEN RESIDENCE �f ELEVATION �¢�� =^� I 1 198 1 ------------------ I 1 I I I I I I -- I I � I I I / m -. u I I I I m+ I I y I I I I I I I I � I I � I I � I 1 � I I � I I I / 106 197 198 101 I I _ILA 1 MGE om. c � eesmr SANDEN RE5IDENGE �¢ m&ARAGE PLAN H aO�`A � �f a � �( }(( \ }\ ` {( {/ !!! \ } R \� -- ] a� , e a &� ƒ / °S�, ^ - ° ` aS e, b ( or _ m` {\ -0t, !r(,. H 11 99 MC4E 5ANDEEN RESIPFN(E 5EGT;ON D N T 3 i Y � 4 0 i m 1 Z p m 9 sP k �g a6 S 8gs s 3 r� A § � I b T MGE aRRiTN^ a oes cK SANDEN RE510ENGE PG WALL SEGTION5 S ,w °O s M,� 966 _ s= MIMI MGE aRRiTN^ a oes cK SANDEN RE510ENGE PG WALL SEGTION5 ,w °O s M,� 966 _ ) CY ® \� ! ! ! } \ §!i! ■4 :.:§ �!2 \ \ \ ( § ( ( \ § / \ ( { / \ \ \ _§ FR § \�( § __ | \ _ � e s a / SO .��>)e 967- I R s ez z I 1 I tin o�MGEeESwx I a o< I OZ I I V \ � I — /� zj I I `- a 5ANDEN RE51MENCF MAIN LEVEL LIG3-iTING PLAN' m� � �p r O F ii m o` v N r ui O R- D b lS A J o g m N I R s ez z I 1 I tin o�MGEeESwx I a o< I OZ I I V \ � I — /� zj I I `- a 5ANDEN RE51MENCF MAIN LEVEL LIG3-iTING PLAN' m� � i i i i i i i i f i Ai a� I y � r ---------------------- - - - - -� i I i i i i i i i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J L - u y ..o,ao NMGE I 5ANDEN RE5IDENGE UPPER LEVEL '� �, ouu+rucd ors cu „o„ «r- LIGHTING PLAN "�"„� 4 _i w I 4 I \ I � I � I I I I -------------------- - --�-- ---------------- I I � •�` \ ��g taa4v r (\ a � h I HIM I i l'li it x P: ;5 "y :g aa� Pill �$ '11 9�§ ce m � ppg 118 a #� �a� 4 1 roa„ g 8 hl 4 I \ $I. g a� 3 € e 5 � 5 Q n g° "o m S ° -971 - m m Y r PIN, 107M of • gable on pitched or hip roof. sa. •: •: • c• � • f - • �. e. • • as e' Ii -972- - , it / // / / oa ar MW az If I el i / ;w /am/ -_m xouaod Aiaaaraxwaox)_ —z.� — _ xouraxnod w doa r. / m °riy // 0.vr. e .or.et.ae s i aera= xourOxnod °-}' '- ' -'�'- oxvu.ar / l I ' na a -f � / / yi' �i / �. it y� ' � _.✓ � �(r °"\°'°�a° //r (3xorzgo -n eraia was) �I I / Y ✓ 46 o �' (.amine AS muwxn TM ONO auYA WO —vm aaseoad oga pig. - sb'er -- -- ozz oo'u wrars w a s xi ! / e v /✓ wraa aaem a awa X i �� / x1d30 'JNLL061150a1 I / O /` � Oi66 Yl� tl3d0ad 3a/LSx3 �IION ! OJ / ___ l wrar3 ;� eAS eg/ I ✓ II / __ezross =Hari Wood da d� ' qb/ i �s�i ai d I; ✓� /' / / ess- o3s "d / OxY aalrm da wam, _ L - d* I ?fWOSrY .` ,as— / '2 d O1,BY.aS S r 1. 1. PROP NOTE 1. 1. PRONE, N BOUNDARY, EXISTING GROUND CONTOVRS, SHOWN A AND ORDINARY HIGH WATER LAND ARE SHOWN ACCORDING TO MEYER-020J, LANG SERVICES CE14/1Z E OF SURVEY, FILE I020J, LAST RENSED 11/14/11. 2. BUILDER MUST VERIFY THAT SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUITABLE FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCnON. 3. BUILDER AND /OR OWNER SHALL - VERIFY PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDAnON & FLOOR ELEVATION SEPARATION DIMEN51ONS AND HOUSE FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS. / NOTIFY MEYER -ROHUN LAND SERVICES OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MORRISSEY BUILDERS LEGAL DESI]RIPTION lots 1, 2, 24. 25, antl 26, WHIPPLE Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Parcel 10: 25- 117 -24 -12 -0206) ZONING INFORMATION (ProWd,d b t8 City of Wound) RIA (Single Frady Residential) Minimum Setbacke- Front - 20 feet Side - 10 feet (6 feet for lots of record) Rear - 20 feet Waterbury Road (unimproved) - 15 feet Cobden Lane (unimproved) - 10 feet Ordinary High Water - 50 feet Bluff - 10 feet EI000 INFORMATION (FlRM MAP NUMBER 27053CO292E) Flood Zone AE (ELEVATION 9J1) Watershed District 100 -, flood elevation - 931.5 according to infavmation from the City of Mound Gm7.- t' /,= 2c)' ® 00*0n IRON RWuldvir EWNO o mcnTs am 90VIIYDtr ur • DENM MAR SET (HWE£ GOPHER OETSED 3/25/15: RENSED PROPOSED GRADING &RETAINING WALLS I hereby certify that this survey, pion, or report was prepared by me or under my 974 direct supe sign and that I am Lirensed Land Sureyar under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 3/24/2015 Abram A. Niemela U,bes. No 48664 £MSRNC INDEX CW/WR -sss _ EMSITNO INTERMEDIATE QiNR.4 /R * 950.0 EMSRNO GROUND EIEVA RON - — PROPOSED CWTWR vW.P FROFOSEV (FOUND E AnW —° OIR£CRW OF DRAMIAZ PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (amartn t(cenws, m c wwRn er aW+maemv. ro ee owavo er otNCes) m9560 p{CepgD Rt7AM.WG RAU. EIEVAIXAS� eR mo rwTm r WN eFBJRad r eAm CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MORRISSEY BUILDERS LEGAL DESI]RIPTION lots 1, 2, 24. 25, antl 26, WHIPPLE Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Parcel 10: 25- 117 -24 -12 -0206) ZONING INFORMATION (ProWd,d b t8 City of Wound) RIA (Single Frady Residential) Minimum Setbacke- Front - 20 feet Side - 10 feet (6 feet for lots of record) Rear - 20 feet Waterbury Road (unimproved) - 15 feet Cobden Lane (unimproved) - 10 feet Ordinary High Water - 50 feet Bluff - 10 feet EI000 INFORMATION (FlRM MAP NUMBER 27053CO292E) Flood Zone AE (ELEVATION 9J1) Watershed District 100 -, flood elevation - 931.5 according to infavmation from the City of Mound Gm7.- t' /,= 2c)' ® 00*0n IRON RWuldvir EWNO o mcnTs am 90VIIYDtr ur • DENM MAR SET (HWE£ GOPHER OETSED 3/25/15: RENSED PROPOSED GRADING &RETAINING WALLS I hereby certify that this survey, pion, or report was prepared by me or under my 974 direct supe sign and that I am Lirensed Land Sureyar under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 3/24/2015 Abram A. Niemela U,bes. No 48664 NF6 AND w DSOR Roan 80.80 it � � � fi 9s6— � �___ASiuuFD Lacanav i iFd TOP OF ROAR ELEV.-MO 6 -- ia.0O_ OARAX -9AZ� ENSURE PROPER MOST iWnNG OEPM / /I OUE TO LONER GLADE M REAR Or GARAGE p / m 6.0 P .�I� /#0. APR SOSED WATER 2 �___ LT /�LAA bb / n 9u o (aucuuExr au np6R) // o RP OF ROAR ElEV- +9sz]o (RE6.aR o.ap n. us* o< LOr uNE) { e f / / �bm e' �P� / 'OOH` ^. p m asir / o / 1__zs• /n PROPOSED HWSE ° °,' !/ § Lout PLOOR=e¢p TOP OF POUNDAREN -06.o /l , { fi f- 'P i S 8 88.80 // 'eGP ®_ �/ TOP OF PWNOADON ij °4 0 ° r i 1_� ow/ — (NGRMMESISE)— PORPON CT —• +' �( m 1/ e w'e' xpr •PO Qt � i l I � / / / / l �A, / f / / L CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR MORRISSEYBUILDERS LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Lot a i, Z 24, 25, and 26. WHIPPLE Hennepin County, —950 — MSMG INDEX C,MfwR Min at.. E (Parcel ID: 25-117-24-12-0206) j - - - - -- 953 - - - All O moms *mN lewumovT SET * 9500 ZONING INFORMATION (Prov'ded by the City of Mound) RIA (Sfngle Family Residentiol) Flood Zone AE (ELEVA ➢ON 9J1) Minimum Setbacks: Front - 20 het .. / Side - /0 Net (5 feet for lots of record) Ma,g Rear - 20 Net 7/25/15: ftEVISEp PROPOSED GRADING &RETAINING WALLS Waterbury Road (unimproved) - 15 feet Watershed District 100 -y.. flood elewtfon - 9J1.5 Cobden Lane (unimproved) - 10 feat y Ordinary High Wale- - 50 feet affording to information from the City of Mound Bluff - 10 feet —950 — MSMG INDEX C,MfwR j - - - - -- 953 - - - ELOOD INFORMATION TFlRM MAP NUMBER 2205JCO292E) O moms *mN lewumovT SET * 9500 EXISTING GR%WD ELEVATION Flood Zone AE (ELEVA ➢ON 9J1) PROPOSED CWTOUR Ma,g PROPOSED (FOUND ELEVARW 7/25/15: ftEVISEp PROPOSED GRADING &RETAINING WALLS —� Watershed District 100 -y.. flood elewtfon - 9J1.5 y PROPOSED RETAINING WALL. affording to information from the City of Mound �eN SURVEYOR'S NOTE: desa, 'K1e4 ro e[ t¢aa is ar dnenrs) �e f. 1. PROPERTY BOUNDARY, EXISTING GROUND CONTOURS, g1Oot55I N M4MG wALL ElfVii direct ape slcn and that 1 am o Licensed "me SHOW AND ORDINARY HIGH WATER ARE Lord Surveyor under the lows of the State e..,se, o<wu LANE SHOWN ACCORDING LAND SERVICES A Dote 312412015 V , FILE 10203, ISED CERTIFlCAIE OF SURVEY, FILE 10207, LAST REVISED Abram N Mallets 11/14/12. License No. 48664 2. BUILDER MUST VERIFY MAT SOIL CONDITIONS ARE SUITABLE FOR ME PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. J. BUILDER AND /OR OWNER SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATION k FLOOR ELEVATION SEPARATION DIMENSIONS AND HOUSE FOOTPRINT DIMENSIONS / NOTIFY MEYER -RCHUN LAND SERVICES OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING EXCAVATION. 26) � —950 — MSMG INDEX C,MfwR 0 DENOsM IFCY.' MONDMENT F 0 - - - - -- 953 - - - - -_ EMSRNG INTERWfX1ATE CONTOUR O moms *mN lewumovT SET * 9500 EXISTING GR%WD ELEVATION 0 DEMOTES R ®AF SET (MOUSE IkNNFR ana£O PROPOSED CWTOUR Ma,g PROPOSED (FOUND ELEVARW 7/25/15: ftEVISEp PROPOSED GRADING &RETAINING WALLS —� DIR£CDW Of' DRAINAGE PROPOSED RETAINING WALL. AuddrI ED wcaema To AE 1s"muo er 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan, or desa, 'K1e4 ro e[ t¢aa is ar dnenrs) report was preomed by me or under my rome g1Oot55I N M4MG wALL ElfVii direct ape slcn and that 1 am o Licensed "me rrrre or wek Lord Surveyor under the lows of the State e..,se, o<wu of Minnesota. -976- Dote 312412015 Abram N Mallets License No. 48664 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 15 -06 Variance for 2180 Cardinal Lane REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Bruce Stillman, has applied for a variance to allow the construction of a detached, two -car garage on the property. The 15,000 square foot property is located on Cardinal Lane, just north of Lynwood Boulevard. The property has an existing home that was constructed in 1936 and placed only 10 feet from the front property line. The property currently has no garage. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow construction of a detached garage 12 feet from the front property line. The property slopes significantly from the front to the back impacting the ability of the applicant to construct a conforming garage. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their April 21, 2015 meeting. A neighbor stated that he was in support of the project. After the discussion, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously for approval of the variance. The draft minutes have been included for your reference. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. -977- 1:7��i7�ItiC• ,;IxiR�i�lE�� 2180 CARDINAL LANE PLANNING CASE • 0. WHEREAS, the applicant, Bruce Stillman, submitted a request for a variance to allow the construction of a detached, two -car garage on the property located at 2180 Cardinal Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -2 two - family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the home, which was built in 1936, does not currently have a garage; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a two -car, detached garage approximately 12 feet from the front property line; and WHEREAS, the existing home on the property is located approximately 10 feet from the front property line; and WHEREAS, the property slopes from its front to its rear. The placement of the proposed garage closer to the street will minimize the amount of the foundation that will have to be built up to construct the garage; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) identifies the following criteria to be used when evaluating requests for variances: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub.129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. WHEREAS, "practical difficulties" is defined in City Code Section 129 -2 as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the April 21, 2015 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its April 21, 2015 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the variance as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its April 28, 2015 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The construction of a detached, two -car garage is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. -979- 3. The construction of a garage in this location on the property will not alter the residential character of the street. 4. The slope, wetlands, and floodplain on the site impact the potential areas where a garage can be built. The proposed location minimizes the amount of fill needed on the site to provide a sound, structural base for the garage. 5. The applicant has reduced the visual impact of the variance by setting the garage farther back than the home on the property. 6. Other properties in this neighborhood have structures that are placed closer to the street than allowed by the zoning code. ; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. The ground in the area along the back of the proposed garage where some additional fill is required shall be sufficiently compacted. 4. The existing slope to the wetland needs to be protected with silt fence and any areas disturbed will need to be re- seeded. 5. Applicant shall construct a hard surface driveway that meets City Code requirements. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 7. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 10. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property on the attached Exhibit A. Adopted by the City Council this 28th of April, 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone, and Pete Wiechert. Members absent: David Goode, Doug Gawtry, Jeffrey Bergquist, and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Mark Sanderson, 4917 Island View Drive; Brian Seidlitz, 2162 Cardinal Lane; Jim Brunzell, 5111 Windsor Road; Dan Sanden, 4505 West Branch Road; Bruce Stillman,2180 Cardinal Lane BOARD OF APPEALS C. Variance PC Case No. 15 -06 Garage Construction 2180 Cardinal Lane Applicant: Bruce Stillman Rita Trapp introduced the variance request. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow a detached, two -car garage on the property located 8 feet into the front setback. The existing home is setback from the property line 10 feet. The garage will improve the visual impact because it is planned slightly behind the front of the house. Smieja asked if there's a minimum driveway length. Trapp said no. He asked about gutter requirement. Trapp said that it will be addressed at building permit review. He also asked about the compaction requirement. Again, Trapp said it will be addressed at building permit review. Brian Seidlitz (2162 Cardinal Lane) said that it is the only place for the garage to go and he has no objection. Bruce Stillman (2180 Cardinal Lane) added a "fun fact ". He said that everything on the lower side was a cleanup area for Tonka Toys and the area behind the house is marshland. MOTION by Smieja, second by Wiechert, to approve the variance with the recommended conditions 1 -9 and finding of facts 1 -6. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Penner, second by Stone, to adjourn at 7:45 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director April 15, 2015 15 -06 Variance Bruce Stillman 2180 Cardinal Lane (PID No. 13- 117 -24 -34 -0014) April 21, 2015 Low Density Residential R -2 Two Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Bruce Stillman, has applied for a variance to allow the construction of a detached, two -car garage on the property. The 15,000 square foot property is located on Cardinal Lane, just north of Lynwood Boulevard. The property has an existing home that was constructed in 1936. There is not a garage currently on the property. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on March 26, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be March 27, 2015. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around April 16, 2015 to inform them of the variance request. SITE INFORMATION The 15,308 square foot property located on Cardinal Lane is 175 wide and 87 feet deep. The home is setback 10 feet from the front property line. As shown in the materials provided, the applicant is proposing the construction of two -car detached garage to the southwest of the home. The following table summarizes the dimensions for the proposed garage: •;. Required Proposed Variance Front Yard 20 feet 12 feet 8 feet Rear Yard 15 feet 46 feet Side Yard (southwest) 6 feet 80 feet Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 6,123 sq. ft. 2,055 sq. ft. •;. STAFF /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Lauren Sampedro, if the detached garage proposal at 2180 Cardinal Lane results in a MCWD land disturbance exceeding 5,000 square feet, or 50 cubic yards of soil from fill or excavation, the applicant should contact MCWD for an erosion control permit. Greg Pederson, There are no fire code or life safety concerns with this garage Fire Chief addition. Melissa Manderschied, This application only addresses the setback variance for the garage City Attorney and does not address any approvals related to the proposed addition to the house that is also shown on the survey. The applicant needs to meet the requirements of Section 129 -39 of the City Code. Dan Faulkner, The owner will need to make sure the ground is sufficiently City Engineer compacted in the area along the back of the proposed garage where some additional fill is required. In addition, the existing slope to the wetland will need to be protected with silt fence and any areas disturbed will need to be re- seeded. DISCUSSION • Currently this property does not have a garage. The applicant would like to construct a detached, two -car garage in the vicinity of the house. The City of Mound has determined that a two -car garage is a reasonable accessory structure for a single - family residential home. • A building permit was issued to the applicant in 2014 to undertake conforming modifications /additions to the existing house. • The existing home is setback only 10 feet from the property line. The applicant is planning to place the new garage closer to the street than allowed by the zoning code, but farther from the property line than the house. • There is approximately 5 feet from the property line to the street back of curb. • The property has a slope from its front to its rear. The applicant is requesting a variance, in part, to minimize the amount of the foundation that will have to be built up to construct the garage. ® Construction of a new garage requires the construction of a hard surface driveway in accordance with all applicable code requirements. STAFF RECOMMENDATION in accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a variance to construct a home on an undersized existing lot of record subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. The ground in the area along the back of the proposed garage where some additional fill is required shall be sufficiently compacted. 4. The existing slope to the wetland needs to be protected with silt fence and any areas disturbed will need to be re- seeded. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 6. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 9. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The construction of a detached, two -car garage is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The construction of a garage in this location on the property will not alter the residential character of the street. 4. The slope, wetlands, and floodplain on the site impact the potential areas where a garage can be built. The proposed location minimizes the amount of fill needed on the site to provide a sound, structural base for the garage. 5. The applicant has reduced the visual impact of the variance by setting the garage farther back than the home on the property. 6. Other properties in this neighborhood have structures that are placed closer to the street than allowed by the zoning code. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is Tuesday, April 28, 2015. m n4L lTV OF F�fOL'N 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 472 -0600 FAX 952- 472 -0620 a X29 VARIANCE Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. //�` Planning Commission Date 5a of � Case No. 15D City Council Date ISO <a�,j_^ SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESC, PROPERTY OWNER Please type or print tegimy Address �Lj C\i��\ l owl 1OUi, q•r t5il u , k� �e` 4. r Block- �)— SubdivisioniiC' <�q€ M l \YVLoL' �} +y�r —q• <� 4 t�1Y3S . W Zoning o, R1A R2 R3 B1 82 B3 (Circle one) Name ( Email Address'"[ 1 t (t) IQZ �\!C� S �V\ Phone Hom6i52 Lt l a 929 Z- Work (t ERG `L{U. c�Fax APPLICANT I Name (IF OTHER THAN Addre OWNER) I Phone Home Email Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning prOCel for this property? Yes ( ) No (�,J. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutidns. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): ) 61'i 0t � a) & 4\ N2 E `h' <:t -kF0. 1 W10 C '1` (oA E 92� 4P L^, 2 aci\,y, s't --� 2 1 E 1 2 `IE 11� M C P Variance Information (112/2015) Page 4 of 6 _988_ Case No. L ,D 3 Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED Front Yard: (NSEW) ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W) ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W) ft. Rear Yard: (NSEW) ft- Lakeside: ( N S E W) ft. : (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: ft. u sq ft REQUESTED (or existing) ft ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. II- ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ) drainage () existing situation { ) too shallow ( ) shape () other: specify Please describe: ` >) ° _:t C "F 2 -<,F--\ % R r.Ac Variance Information (11212015) Page 5 of 6 -989- Case No. 6 Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), NoF If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), N ,�o, W If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes(✓f, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: \ i I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. owner's Sig Applicant's Variance Information (11212015) Page 6 of 6 _990_ Date z° 7 Variance application for Bruce Stillman at 2180 Cardinal Ln. mound Facts that are important to take note of as follows, It seems that almost all the houses on the streets have a similar setback of only 10 feet from the property line, this includes my house on 2180 Cardinal Ln, so asking for a variance on the garage setback seems to follow the nature of the street and how the other houses are placed with the reduced setback. Being in architecting and artists, the aesthetics and how things look are important to me, and putting the garage to as I request, would look nice, and since it doesn't stick out as far as the other house fronts, and is the first structured on the streets on the right side, that the aesthetics of how it lays out makes it an attractive approach to the street. Since it makes sense to have dk garage with the house in Minnesota, and that most houses to have a garage, that building the addition to make this old house attractive and functional, it' s a reasonable request to allow it to have a garage. And technically this is about the only wa}Sieould have a garage, in setback the property line as much is reasonably possible, I feel it'll fit into the neighborhood just fine, and will look nice. A lot nicer than the shed across the street from this property that has no setback and has been crushed by a tree, and has been sitting this way for a year .......................... Bruce Stillman -991- y U � c (j U1 u I u ` N Ob h 4' N 3 N N � N f � ,( I I I I I I I I / I r r b m I I I I S 36'16 °39" E zoo( l 151 ' 21.2 lzo 424 le of Dweiiing 424 ka _W / 12.0 r 4 ,yp mgr Op / P' A�� I/ ,'/ //�'�' /�{ /lR �/ /�S�`�� >�N �,1 /,i✓ ill ,l 10'~ -- �_I_r�_L_ 11" 8u ding' Setback (TYP) I I II 10 I I , , ®, -- 87.95 -- N 3678'04" W -992- 1 s to N n 1 1n M N I� Pound ZK C J S U Pound ZK o / \ NSfSXB Sx � CC $ W jig yC$ $� Q ass & N cl Alt JAI ""t /� � ♦may d� � � /.� $�� 11 T. \ Y 1 .• \ W� l s 1141, WEE � —993— 7*' MIN KM E LEOTIO 4 OP Icv FKDOT E LEM I OH 994 - LEFT E LEUT I OU !■�I ( to r KIW ILL TIM ip -995- i2" (P 0 s a� LI LI I i t� L L, Y YS I I u Nj L 20,K. �0 YiAae 'o lfspXp lb 4- e416, RvrrArr eat., �. R�'�Nfau�D GONG< 2-QJt i3�� °bC IN (p1nlOVOJ ;lht A ► �' tNyvr,, s��k�- VLPVT w p4pfx., 0, V, cam-. ,: JPo c . SPR� J Ma N >, . r� 1 n li I� {�1jt LL,tVV\lIVN_ iaC 1/0s 1, ,p. SJfh S 1.10* Olt . t� s LID N W' tY 2" -(P EO 5cwvccr§ -� M*09 -: 5 Go "a•� KamosNaw not` _. N ,a • Pyle y V6' =" I RN MMM Aunt M.4 s� V taw LOT AREA SQ. FT. X3O% = (for all lots) ............... ................ SQ. FT. X4o% = (for Lots of Record) ............ ............... ^ Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined m Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see ham),a plan must bo submitted and approved oy the umomnOfficial, LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT ~1 c HOUSE �` x � u `w /0 X �� / � � —`^ TOTAL HOUSE TOTAL OTHER— .................. .......... —.... ........... TOTAL HARDCOVER /IMPERVIOUS SURFACE.. —~.,.. ................ .—....^ UNDER/ OVER (indicate difference) . ...................... ,~ ..... � PREPARED BY Revised 01112110 � | W8� �� A� ^ !� | n"" �" �vw 6 ~A (/ uv / � DETACHED BUILDINGS X (GARAGE/SHED) X = TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ........................ ...... DRIVEWAY, PARKING |(«0 X � AREAS, SIDEWALKS, Y.�1� ETC /^~'" X � X � TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ... ................... .............. DECKS open decks (1*rmin. x � opening between boards) with o pervious surface under are not X � counted oshardcover K � TOTAL DECK ............................ _............... ..— X � X � TOTAL OTHER— .................. .......... —.... ........... TOTAL HARDCOVER /IMPERVIOUS SURFACE.. —~.,.. ................ .—....^ UNDER/ OVER (indicate difference) . ...................... ,~ ..... � PREPARED BY Revised 01112110 � | W8� �� A� ^ !� | n"" �" �vw 6 ~A (/ uv / C r 'rte y A AC MrSTE111241FA Minnesota Department of Public Safety APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY BEFORE SUBMITTING TO ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT City /County Date Approved j�(p c O IJ City Fee Amount Permit Date i-f -21 -t �;" Date Fee Paid Signature City Clerk or County Official Approved Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement NOTE: Submit this form to the city or county 30 days prior to event. Forward application signed by city and /or county to the address above. If the application is approved the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division will return this application to be used as the permit for the event. j -1Qg1- ef- :CP (L Page 1 of 1 c.oC -e I10 V City of Mound and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Near Term (Immediate — 1 year) Updates in Sold Italics - 2015 -14 Citv of Mnund MCES borative information gathering and system Collaborative information gathering and system modeling investigation modeling investigation orative 1/1 Mitigation and Field Detection investigate options to correct individual service fNEW Emergency Operation Plan Implementation issues at Sulgrave /Warner where connections project are direct to MCES MH abilitation of Ma nholes at the east end of Lynwood & Langdon Lake work plan to mitigate orewood Lane to prevent Inflow (DONE) sewer main inundation Continue Lift Station reconstruction program L38 Upgrades (Ongoing) (Bid and awarded) Continue 1/1 sewer main lining program Calibrate Flow meters and lift station run times /measured pumping Calibrate lift station run times /measured Investigate /Flow Meter L50 /Enchanted Island pumping flows — Engage Minnetrista in discussions Flow Meter Installations at Lift Stations: C -3 Collaborative 1/1 Mitigation and Field Detection (Baywood), C -1 (Glen Elyn), A -2 (Grandview) Private Service Lining Program Research and NEW L40 Forcemain /Gravity Project in advance Development (Ongoing) of L39 Construction in conjunction with 2015 Tuxedo Project Medium Term (2 —4 years) Citv of Mound MCES Smoke Testing for roof drain /drain tile cross Relocate L39 and eliminate L40 1gravity connections (Possible education opportunity) replacement project - inspection of sump pump connections with Additional storage at downstream of higher ture radio read water meter replacement volume forcemains? (Minnetrista & Shoreview/ project Minnetrista) tinue Adding Flow Meters at City Lift stations FForcuemain Meter for all flows coming off the Island Complete teed forcemain separations L38 Upgrades (Ongoing) separation for E -3 in conjunction with Replace sewer pipe north of Langdon Lake - 9 new forcemain NEW PLANNED FOR 2016 upgrades /replacement to 6 -MO -650 Gravity with Additional Capacity (36 "/60 ") eliminate L25 Meterflows coming from Three Points Long Term (5+ years) City of Mound MLtS Continue Lift Station reconstruction program Address capacity Issues in 7021/1-38 Forcemain leaving Mound pumping towards Blue Lake Continue 1/1 sewer main lining program Future Collaborative Items: • Mound /MCES joint effort to support legislation appropriating more funds for 1/1 elimination -1002- 0 1. SCADA Monitoring a. Closely monitor SCADA readings to determine possible next steps a. Event Screen Monitoring Pumping Times b. Individual Lift Station Run Times c. Transducer levels /water, depths d. Looking for 2 pumps running with no reduction in transducer levels e. Flow Meter Readings - looking for constant flow instead of intermittent' flow b. If SCADA readings appear to be slow or falling behind begin visual monitoring at selected sanitary sewer manholes a. begin visual monitoring at: i. Grandview/Lynwood — MH A -26 ii. Langdon Lane — MH A -24 iii. Lynwood /Cotton — MH A -130 iv. Bradford /Wilshire — MH G -1 v. Emerald/Wilshire — MH E -48 vi. Bradford/Richmond/Devon — MH G -21 & G -22 c. If manhole monitoring shows levels are reaching critical levels move to step 2 -1003- L STEP 2 2. Emergency vacuum /pumping activities a. Call in City of Mound utility division crew to scramble city vacuum truck b. Determine locations where interim pressure relief may be performed • Grandview/Lynwood — MH A -26 • Bradford/Richmond/Devon — MH G -21 • Other areas to be determined as needed c. Other locations as determined by localized surface water flooding and manhole observations d. Determine if other interim vacuum equipment will be needed e. Call for external vacuum equipment a. Peterson's Sewage (763- 972 -2420) b. Sullivan's sewage (952 - 473 -4300) c. Infra -tech for extra vac trucks (763- 428 -6488) f. If system inundation progresses - Consult Public Works Superintendent From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager; Stewart B. Simon, Field Officer ,C Date: April 21, 2015 Re: GovDelivery Community Notification Updates Honorable Mayor and Council Members Based on the lessons learned during last spring's unprecedented flood event, Staff identified the need to communicate quickly with citizens, as a top priority. As a result, the GovDelivery Platform was implemented in June 2014. As of April 21, 2015, over 1,200 citizens have signed up to receive E -mail and text messages from the City. On average, two (2) new subscribers are added to the system each day, the majority signing up directly through an overlay on our City website. Citizens also have the ability to sign up for messages at City Hall, Harbor Wines and Spirits, and through a form found in our newsletter. Our GovDelivery Platform allows our citizens to receive only the information they want; including notifications on hydrant flushing, road closures, water and utility service interruptions, general City of Mound news, critical events, and street project updates. Messages can be sent to all subscribers of a topic, or in the case of water and utility service interruptions, sent to only those recipients affected by the interruption, so long as an address was provided at the time of sign -up. Since October 2, 2014, Staff has sent out 25 notifications through GovDelivery, to a combined total of 12,178 recipients. On average, 99% of the messages sent through GovDelivery are delivered as intended. Our average open rate, or average number of E -mails actually opened by the recipient, is 49.8 %. It should be noted, the average open rate for governmental agencies is approximately 12 %. Because of our high engagement level with our subscribers, GovDelivery has recently informed Staff our account has been flagged as being awesome. With this positive feedback in mind, it is Staffs goal to continue to increase our subscriber base and engagement rate for each message sent. This summer, Staff will begin pilot testing the use of GovDelivery to warn subscribers of severe weather, including thunderstorms, tornados, and flooding. -1005- \ \ \ /� /\ J§ /\ 2 / \\ w jz 0 �\ &` k7 �\ _+ 2s ct e% . \.y .c / \ uz vz » � w a a ;2 �z �\ �e .: )\ \\ \ \ \ \ \) �\ \) f may. z [ {» : in y\ \/\ 3 41 \ 4) 0. 2 / Wit\ - :� :° .: „ . w : CL $ \ /!j \j C»t \« - © \ a) a) CL �? » 2 <J!Lu 7 d ® d © 2 q 7 e 2 ¥ -1006- t. • u O O O m m O M m LD It 0 � m m rlj (14 r1l It 1 r4 xr ti ,gg, fi Gl cl) St ip 0 O CL fi . V) O ry UJ M m LD It 0 � m m rlj (14 r1l It 1 r4 Yr fa m son xr ti ,gg, cl) 0 CL . O Yr fa m son Iffilm xr A, 'Wlrv� ggg ,gg, Iffilm O O O O OO)ONOI-400 t, 0 Ln 01 Ln t" r-- r1i to rq r-I ko 0 MEN -1008- ci .0 O U G1 C V) C 0 0 VI N CL u T: 4-1 ul U 0 0 u -0 D Ln CZDOOUh2 0 MEN -1008- ci G1 C CL VI N 4-1 LIJ 0 MEN -1008- w y' fLM U. e 0 U Q O N O) O O C m N m, of 'v h i� H h E v c [ a m ,tl v 0 r 3 b C N t cn [ C N u N V rW O V o v � � LU v v 0 OJ rn c N L d a m v L V N Y O N r� n M d L E m ap« m o W H M N O N O N LO r-4 r-I N t1 C Y .G u o Z v C ° v > d O > in O Ve Q L 6 m v c E p o c s O ° m E J Vi � i c N c N vu�i L C = N E d J v Z 0 -. N T m W Q O O O N C o o u°1i o o v o E v o N c_ O v v 0 OJ rn c N L d a m v L V N Y O N r� n s r 0 u a O N m O N 0 N m m 0 vi 0 e F E 0 c' a '3 b c c� v V 7 N C 3 .c -1010- r ui O t a C N V C ro 0 N 4 0 W p 0 m 3 m u.� > u `� .c -1010- r ui « 0 0 0 0 0 m M N d1 M K r W to lD ct CF In r4 N I-� W y (o t, n n n E d m! A ' c c W u - m 0) I., N (N c M h co l0 0) 5i m L v u C � <C O T Q C N (o N N N N N N O O S v a z O W .c -1010- r ui r m M N o M LM a a a v a N C' d 7 61 Y �q Ln Pl N C C Q O a W D N C O U. m N > V p1 N w c a O U u �O 01 z m m C v _o V y N J u T 0 O J L 0 u N 2 V O vi m v c a 0 ® V a U - VI x t v Q. p ° U _ S C_ N l0 l0 l0 r N Ol Ln N N (0 3 (D O N Qt W N W to cr O 0) OO 0) c0 W co r n n h N N c C a E "o IT L o L Y U ® Q 3 W v d h L � ZN � W v d 41w V c J L y U v l U V1 W O O � x N w v o u rn N N F- W U J N d O d - T ro Q} Q U v °` Q 5 v o O CL Z C O m C NO N -ig z 3 0 o u h V D a s - 0- u in ¢ x h m o w a _ - 1011 - r f., i • f 1` U a 0 N m O N O m 0 O M If M E 2 m W Ul J a O � m C 0 0 a c E N k E n un d, C O1 rl. L W } n O h G C C � c c y fi i pl W (p v � � u W ° -1012- W C7 u 4 v a.. E �. y0 °7 v CL � 0 0 a Q o U 2 G .� VI .f) n n 3 v a m Y E 2 m W Ul J a O � m C 0 0 a c E N k E n un d, C O1 rl. L W } n O h G C C � c c y fi i pl W (p v � � u W ° -1012- W C7 u 4 v a.. E �. y0 °7 v CL � 0 0 a Q o U 2 G .� VI .f) n n 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN. 55364 (952) 472 -0605 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Field Officer Stewart B. Simor�j Date: April 23, 2015 Re: Request for action on recommendation for approval of an Annual Dangerous Dog registration fee of $500.00, in accordance with MN Statute §347.51 Honorable Mayor and City Council: On June 21, 2011, two "Pitbull" type dogs belonging to Brandon Loycano and Shelly Loycano ran off their property, located at 4701 Aberdeen Road, towards the 3200 block of Roanoke Lane and brutally attacked and injured a small dog being walked on a leash. The victim dog was taken to the Lake Minnetonka Animal Hospital, where it was treated for severe injuries. The victim dog survived the attack. Mound Police Department Community Service Officer Phil Spanjers met with Mr. Loycano and served him "Potentially Dangerous Dog" notices for each dog, for the unprovoked attack. On April 02, 2015, Mr. and Mrs. Loycano's two Pitbull style dogs left their property and attacked a large dog as it was being walked on a leash down Aberdeen Road, just West of Roanoke Lane. Mr. Loycano tackled the victim dog as he was "just trying to break it up ". The victim dog did not have any visible bite marks, but did develop a limp. April 03, 2015, Orono Police Department Sergeant Tony Wittke served Mr. Loycano "Dangerous Dog" notice for both dogs, for the unprovoked attack by a "Potentially Dangerous Dog ". The Orono Police Department has referred this matter back to the City of Mound, pursuant to Minnesota Statute §347.51 DANGEROUS DOGS: REGISTRATION. Minnesota Statute §347.51, states an animal control authority shall issue a certificate of registration to the owner of a dangerous dog if the owner presents sufficient evidence of the following criteria: -A proper enclosure exists for the dangerous dog and a posting on the premises with a clearly visible warning sign, provided by the animal control authority, that there is a dangerous dog on the property, including a warning symbol to inform children; -A surety bond in the sum of at least $300,000, payable to any person injured by the dangerous dog, or a policy of liability insurance in the amount of at least $300,000, insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the dangerous dog; -1013- -The owner has paid an annual fee of not more than $500, in addition to any regular dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a dangerous dog; and -The owner has had microchip identification implanted in the dangerous dog; Minnesota Statute §347.50 subd. 7, defines the term animal control authority as an agency of the state, county, municipality, or other governmental subdivision of the state which is responsible for animal control operations in its jurisdiction. The City of Mound is classified as an animal control authority, as the City requires and issues animal licenses. The annual certificate of registration fee of not more than $500 is outside the scope of the City's licensing fee schedule. Staff is recommending approval of an annual Certificate of Registration for a Dangerous Dog fee of $500, consistent with Minnesota Statute §347.51. Staff also requests reimbursement for Staffs time and materials related to the posting of the required warning sign on the premises. Staff has requested Mr. and Mrs. Loycano appear in front of the City Council, for a fee determination. 2-1014- RP I Barthe, Kevin William M f 4613 Hanover Rd, Mound, MN 55364 Men I Loycano, Brandon Michael I M I 4701 Aberdeen Rd, Mound, MN 55364 1 4011110111ft I� Wit I Klein. lames Aaron 1 4701 Aberdeen Rd, Mound, MN 55364 1 1 Barthe reported he was walking his 80 lb German Shephard on a leash on Aberdeen Rd just West of Roanoke when two large pitbull breed dogs left the yard of 4701 Aberdeen Rd and attacked his dog. Barthe said his dog was underneath the two dogs and was getting bitten. While the attack occurred, Loycano came out of his home and ran towards the dogs and tackled the german shephard. Barthe stated after the dogs were separated, he called 411 right away. Barthe said he did not observe any bite marks, but the dog had a limp. Barthe said his dog was up to date in shots and licensing. After speaking with Barthe, I followed -up at 4701 Aberdeen Rd and spoke with Loycano. Loycano explained his dogs were outside, unleashed and without bark collars when he heard them barking. Loycano said he ran outside to intervene. Loycano was asked why he tackled the german shephard and he responded it was dark and he was "just trying to break it up." Loycano said the dogs are normally well mannered. Loycano said he had a previous incident with one of the dogs over three years prior where another dog was attacked and the skin of the dog had been punctured. Loycano said he had not had an incident since. Loycano said the 40 -45 pound dogs were American Staffordshire Terriers (similar to a pitbull), were up to date on shots and were licensed in 2014. The 2014 Mound license numbers for the Terriers were 44 and 45. The Tag numbers for the Westonka Vet Clinic were 50354 and 50361. Loycano and his wife said they would take care of any vet clinic bills for Barthe's dog if requested. I informed Loycano that he needed to keep his dogs quarantined in the kennel and he would be contacted by a CSO for further information and requirements. *Forward to CSO Kirschner for follow -up. DISPOSITION: UNFOUNDED ❑ CLEARED BY ARREST ❑ REF. OTHER AGENCY ❑ INACTIVE ❑ OTHER COPT TO: CO ATTORNEY ❑ CITY ATTY ❑ COURT ❑ IMP CONS ❑ PLATE IMPOUND ❑ OUTSIDE AGENCY ❑ OTHER T. Sonnek #521 LOGIS ORO O POLICE DEPARTMENT INITIAL COMPLAINT REPORT e-y CASE NUMBER CAG DATE REPORTED Un 15- 003453 MN0271500 04 -02 -2015 ❑ JUVENILE REPORT cV BADGE HOW RECD 521 C� TIME REPORTED TIME ASSIGNED TIME ARRIVED TIME CLEAR 2114 2117 2123 2135 OTHER ITEMS INCLUDED 0 Lw ❑ PHOTOS Ln w 'LACE COMMITTED CITY ❑ SQUAD VIDEO 4701 Aberdeen Rd, Mound ❑ BOOIGNG VIDEO COMPLAINT ❑ AUDIO RECORDINGS Dog Complaint ❑ PROPERTY INVENTORY RP I Barthe, Kevin William M f 4613 Hanover Rd, Mound, MN 55364 Men I Loycano, Brandon Michael I M I 4701 Aberdeen Rd, Mound, MN 55364 1 4011110111ft I� Wit I Klein. lames Aaron 1 4701 Aberdeen Rd, Mound, MN 55364 1 1 Barthe reported he was walking his 80 lb German Shephard on a leash on Aberdeen Rd just West of Roanoke when two large pitbull breed dogs left the yard of 4701 Aberdeen Rd and attacked his dog. Barthe said his dog was underneath the two dogs and was getting bitten. While the attack occurred, Loycano came out of his home and ran towards the dogs and tackled the german shephard. Barthe stated after the dogs were separated, he called 411 right away. Barthe said he did not observe any bite marks, but the dog had a limp. Barthe said his dog was up to date in shots and licensing. After speaking with Barthe, I followed -up at 4701 Aberdeen Rd and spoke with Loycano. Loycano explained his dogs were outside, unleashed and without bark collars when he heard them barking. Loycano said he ran outside to intervene. Loycano was asked why he tackled the german shephard and he responded it was dark and he was "just trying to break it up." Loycano said the dogs are normally well mannered. Loycano said he had a previous incident with one of the dogs over three years prior where another dog was attacked and the skin of the dog had been punctured. Loycano said he had not had an incident since. Loycano said the 40 -45 pound dogs were American Staffordshire Terriers (similar to a pitbull), were up to date on shots and were licensed in 2014. The 2014 Mound license numbers for the Terriers were 44 and 45. The Tag numbers for the Westonka Vet Clinic were 50354 and 50361. Loycano and his wife said they would take care of any vet clinic bills for Barthe's dog if requested. I informed Loycano that he needed to keep his dogs quarantined in the kennel and he would be contacted by a CSO for further information and requirements. *Forward to CSO Kirschner for follow -up. DISPOSITION: UNFOUNDED ❑ CLEARED BY ARREST ❑ REF. OTHER AGENCY ❑ INACTIVE ❑ OTHER COPT TO: CO ATTORNEY ❑ CITY ATTY ❑ COURT ❑ IMP CONS ❑ PLATE IMPOUND ❑ OUTSIDE AGENCY ❑ OTHER T. Sonnek #521 LOGIS ORON0 POLICE SUPPLEMENTAL nATF CASE # BADGE /OFFICER OFFENSE 04/03/2015 Ir I 5 -3453 506 /Wittke Follow up � On today's date, I was asked to serve `notice of dangerous dog' documentations to 4701 Aberdeen Rd in the City of Mound. I met the homeowner, Brandon Loycano, at his residence who was aware he was being served today. Brandon acknowledged the paperwork and said next week he would be putting both dogs down and burying them at his father's farm. Brandon said he would also provide documentation of euthanization and deliver it to us nextweek. Both signed copies were attached with the case. Brandon was also given two copies of the same paperwork and a citation for dog at large. NFA -1016- ORONO POLICE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT DATE CASE # BADGE /OFFICER OFFENSE 4/6/2015 15- 003453 6566 Animal Foltow Up On 4/3/15 I received the case file for follow up regarding an animal complaint. I completed a records search of LOYCANO, the owner of the violating animals frorn4701 Aberdeen Rd. I noted that on 6/21/2011, CSO Spanjers of the Mound Police Department (Reference Mound PD #11 -1542) declared the animals in relation to this case number "Potentially Dangerous." The signed potentially dangerous declaration documents are attached to this report. I made contact via phone with LOYCANO and advised him that we would be upgrading the dog's status to Dangerous Dogs per Minnesota Statute. I explained the requirements and advised that Sgt. Wittke of the Orono Police Department would be stopping at his residence this evening to provide him declaration notices for both animals. I explained that he would have 14 days to provide evidence of the outlined requirements or the animals would be seized and held at the owner's expense. LOYCANO stated that he understood the requirements and stated that he would most likely have the animals euthanized. Along with copies of the declaration documents I issued LOYCANO a citation for Mound ordiance # 14 -37 for animals allowed to run at large. Per Sgt. Wittke's report, LOYCANO advised that he would be euthanizing the animals and would provide documentation. I will follow up regarding animal's disposition. End of Report. 1017- ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF DANGEROUS DOG 2730 Kelley Pkwy Orono, MN 55356 office: 952 - 2494700 Fax: 952 - 476 -3028 Date of Issuance: Case Number: S 5 9 5 3 DOG OWNER: Name: tb4-Q ^auxn L2t1 c e, "o Date of Birth: Address: `4701 AbctCk4t� (10. MovrJ State: V^"', S, 5 3 (a L1 DESCRIPTION OF DOG: Aw'.0-r+ c A Name: �ei� Z' Breed: `p�O�Jh�re 1 cner color Spayed /Neutered (Y or N): Sex: t- License number: 14 The above listed dog owner is hereby notified that the above described dog is considered to be a Dangerous Dog as defined in Minnesota Statute 347.50 subdivision 2, based upon reasonable cause that the dog has: ❑ without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property (Case number: ); or ❑ killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the owners property (Case number: ); or been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the ownerhas notice that the dog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals (Case number. O P 0 - 1 S - 3453 ). XMC, (-d - 11 - \54 A Said dog owner is hereby ordered to register said dog as a dangerous dog with the County of Hennepin. To register a dangerous dog, the dog owner must bring the Hennepin County Dangerous Dog Registration Form to the Hennepin County Fish and Game Department, Hennepin County Government Center, 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55487. Said dog owner is hereby advised that pursuant to Minnesota Statute 341.50- 347,55, it shall be the lawful duty of a dangerous dog owner to comply with the following provisions of state law. Any person who violates any of these provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor. (1) Within 14 days after the dog owner has received this notice, theowner shall validly register the dog as a dangerous dog with the county as stated in this notice. (2) Within 14 days afterthe dog owner has received this notice, the owner shall secure a surety bond issued by a surety company authorized to conduct business in this state in a form acceptable to the county in the sum of at least $300,000, payable to any person injured by the dangerous dog, or a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance company authorized to conduct business in this state in the amount of at least $300,000, insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the dangerous dog. (3) A standardized, easily identifiable tag shall be issued by the county to the dog owner upon registration, and the dog owner shall be responsible for the tag being affixed to the dog's collar at all times, -1018- (4) From the time of receipt of this notice, the dog shall be maintained in a proper enclosure. "Proper enclosure" means securely confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure suitable to prevent the animal from escaping and providing protection from the elements for the dog. A proper enclosure does not include a porch, patio, or any part of a house, garage, or other structure that would allow the dog to exitof its own volition, or any house or structure in which door or window screens are the only obstacle that prevents the dog from exiting. If the dog is outside the proper enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash and under the physical restraint of a responsible person. The muzzle must be made in a manner that will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration. (5) The owner shall provide for a posting on the premises with a clearly visible warning sign, including a warning symbol to inform children, that there is a dangerous dog on the property. The warning symbol for children will be provided by the county. The Orono Police Department is ordered by law to immediately seize, in lieu of a warrant, any dangerous dog for any violations of provisions 1, 2, or 4, above. In addition, Mound City Code, section 14 -5, Confinement- Fierce Animalsrequires that every owner shall confine within a building or secure enclosure any fierce, dangerous,or vicious animal except when muzzled and in the control of a competent person. A violation of this ordinance is also a misdemeanor. Issuing Officer: _T %h,y, Badge Number: YJ Dog Owner: i7 �/ / �1�fGd (Sig,811. I A.kn..1edg7ierit of receipt): U Date: �— Time: / • y -1019- ORONO POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF DANGEROUS DOG 2730 Kelley Pkwy Orono, MN 55356 Office: 952 - 249 -4700 1 Fax: 952 - 476 -3028 Date of Issuance: DOG OWNER: Name: t3rur cloy ctiatl Lo.g (c- o Address: LD 91 Case Number: 15 3y S,3 Date of Birth: Telephone: ur-1J State: Zip: 9:5 3C° DESCRIPTION OF DOG: A nsn c cr 5i- �,�{oc�shMe. n Name: S ^cj�l Breed: - rc-V6�e Color `J�owr� Spayed /Neutered (Y or N): Sex: f- License number: 14 The above listed dog owner is hereby notified that the above described dog is considered to be a Dangerous Dog as defined in Minnesota Statute 347.50 subdivision 2., based upon reasonable cause that the dog has: ❑ without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property (Case number: ); or ❑ killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the owner's property (Case number: ); or been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has notice that the dog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals (Case number: OPO - 5 S - 3453 ). Muvc� \1 - 1548. Said dog owner is hereby ordered to register said dog as a dangerous dog with the County of Hennepin. To register a dangerous dog, the dog owner must bring the Hennepin County Dangerous Dog Registration Form to the Hennepin County Fish and Game Department, Hennepin County Government Center, 300 South 6th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55487. Said dog owner is hereby advised that pursuant to Minnesota Statute 347.50- 347,55, it shall be the lawful duty of a dangerous dog owner to comply with the following provisions of state law. Any person who violates any of these provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor. (1) Within 14 days after the dog owner has received this notice, the owner shall validly register the dog as a dangerous dog with the county as stated in this notice. (2) Within 14 days after the dog owner has received this notice, the owner shall secure a surety bond issued by a surety company authorized to conduct business in this state in a form acceptable to the county in the sum of at least $300,000, payable to any person injured by the dangerous dog, or a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance company authorized to conduct business in this state in the amount of at least$300,000, insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the dangerous dog. (3) A standardized, easily identifiable tag shall be issued by the countyto the dog owner upon registration, and the dog owner shall be responsible for the tag being affixed to the dog's collar at all times. -1020- (4) From the time of receipt of this notice, the dog shall be maintained in a proper enclosure. "Proper enclosure" means securely confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure suitable to prevent the animal from escaping andproviding protection from the elements for the dog. A proper enclosure does not include a parch, patio, or any part of a house, garage, or other structure that would allow the dog to exitof its own volition, or any house or structure in which door or window screens are the only obstacle that prevents the dog from exiting. If the dog is outside the proper enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash and under the physical restraint of a responsible person. The muzzle must be made in a manner that will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration. (5) The owner shall provide for a posting on the premises with a clearly visible warning sign, including a warning symbol to inform children, that there is a dangerous dog on the property. The warning symbol for children will be provided by the county. The Orono Police Department is ordered by law to immediately seize, in lieu of a warrant, any dangerous dog for any violations of provisions 1, 2, or 4, above. In addition, Mound City Code, section 14 -5, Confinement- Fierce Animals requires that every owner shall confine within a building or secure enclosure any fierce, dangerous, or vicious animal except when muzzled and in the control of a competent person. A violation of this ordinance is also a misdemeanor. Issuing Officer ! Badge Number: Dog Owner: (signature lAckry d9ement ofrecei pt) '. Date: Lf 3 "�S Time: -1021- C N o o 503 000 0 SaOCm O z ~n 0 O -O >0T" Gmom n O 5 of S a�r�nn (n OF TZ OFmz OG)ax -+,ox p��o A n02� O mmm A o m z,AO O,�m m °?ON P�CD Do >mm O *O z>> G y z mOrra- zoo §Dm O m m m m 0 O O m m m 0 _I m 9 Z Z 00 r_ r N Z M G-4 r M N N w �p O Z AO 00 Z m z m 0 0 6bti00Z!MS LZ A m O T d C A O M CD 0 0 CL din O?�O m y� oN IO^NJN 00 Jcoc cn �3nw z� 3a3m« ao�p m� wm,m M. .0 0- N ?N nO ego o.° INOd Wry ON p^- QfN6sN�q .NOp a m ��SA? o �wv wnm 00 IOC�C �n gnm�v meow w oa 3 n =0 wG ' Q °c n° s �f J m m v n o n`m o w8 0 n -n jp o N u, -•unD JicC O_ {ON 3C ��'J ESN NAWN �c VNNO Cp ydnmm m�QV°- 'ooi�ZnodF» m uc -omo� FOQF1OO° O1a[ ONa- N t0 y o �o tnm��o� ro c �nn.m '.m 5.013, °w°a N 00= y yN OORNbI OAOON a''00 NNJ ?.gym m a 'wdmc dwO�m� ymE- _.oA 3.cmp mfw'2'mo a?.m 3Qwm^ JF'm 1°m wpmo S m m J o ao^nm oyQ m ?4J amw aE63 ono mn9r 'm�� N° -a ? J J-i. NJ J nw n3 w w o3� Kw No oop3� w O' O cv nn .0 �Oti N IGI Nw °c nrtoa H ow0 nw�a v o ° C � c J o- 3 wr ono vmJ3m n a-..-1 �o3N omnm�i o ° { 0�5^ mm «gym n o o-n EF vin w m o y. o n �N A �V No Fn Op o� rn ON dw NQ N c' 3 _3n vim.. �JO N ma O zz S n O �g wOHA n0y �O� N mpm0 �n 0. ga -0w mH w N m � K a � E c - O O�O O � �a O �O QVn v �m o 3L Dan o -, 0�� Z�Z 14 °^'v3N W _ z m z m w y > a s z m o 3 y $ 3 _a v p o m n m N M w O D O O .'o ? n a 3 O S ° _ _ O d 0 3 i _ p - p c v vry < m ©N 0 o qMR ya a n m m m y N cN °> o m -� ' v A ry C S °M Q 9 V 3 ti 00 �' d �n 'mD -z o xm y^ d z p1 '� o a n o — m m 0 O O >> f -pl O O 0 p m a o _ F a W o m' m 0 ° m ° m — O N p a m N N >d o 0 230CJ n _- — a n E `w'm O - -,3 d G m C �o a y a o v N a an d o om m ,O <a z o m n t w — a — u i b w c O IJ O O 'Fidu @- s s i m m 0 O O m m m 0 _I m 9 Z Z 00 r_ r N Z M G-4 r M N N w �p O Z AO 00 Z m z m 0 0 6bti00Z!MS LZ A m O T d C A O M CD 0 0 CL din O?�O m y� oN IO^NJN 00 Jcoc cn �3nw z� 3a3m« ao�p m� wm,m M. .0 0- N ?N nO ego o.° INOd Wry ON p^- QfN6sN�q .NOp a m ��SA? o �wv wnm 00 IOC�C �n gnm�v meow w oa 3 n =0 wG ' Q °c n° s �f J m m v n o n`m o w8 0 n -n jp o N u, -•unD JicC O_ {ON 3C ��'J ESN NAWN �c VNNO Cp ydnmm m�QV°- 'ooi�ZnodF» m uc -omo� FOQF1OO° O1a[ ONa- N t0 y o �o tnm��o� ro c �nn.m '.m 5.013, °w°a N 00= y yN OORNbI OAOON a''00 NNJ ?.gym m a 'wdmc dwO�m� ymE- _.oA 3.cmp mfw'2'mo a?.m 3Qwm^ JF'm 1°m wpmo S m m J o ao^nm oyQ m ?4J amw aE63 ono mn9r 'm�� N° -a ? J J-i. NJ J nw n3 w w o3� Kw No oop3� w O' O cv nn .0 �Oti N IGI Nw °c nrtoa H ow0 nw�a v o ° C � c J o- 3 wr ono vmJ3m n a-..-1 �o3N omnm�i o ° { 0�5^ mm «gym n o o-n EF vin w m o y. o n �N A �V No Fn Op o� rn ON dw NQ N c' 3 _3n vim.. �JO N ma O zz S n O �g wOHA n0y �O� N mpm0 �n 0. ga -0w mH w N m � K a � E c MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT nnotinio: 2415 Wilshire Blvd., . • • - ppLiGE OFFENSE REPORT Ph: 952472 -0621 Fax: 952472 -0656 PAGE 1 OF 21 L �- INS MOC MRC S fncidenVOffense Dale Reported Case Nu q1 7 qS >` Dog Bite 06 -21 -2011 11 -1542 -o HRD Badge # Squatl Time Dispatched Time Arrived Time Cleared Earliest Date ®DlRpl Earliest Time TmRpt s R 21 842 0944 0948 1015 0845 Grid NCIC Identifier Place Committed 50 MN0271300 3200 block Roanoke Lane Involvement: A: Arrested J: Juvenile Arrested M. Mentioned RP: Reporting Part S. Suspect V: Victim W: Witness Sex Race Height Weight Eyes Hair Name(First Middle Last) Dale o(Birth Age v �% Blaine Henr Fiveland 68 M W ° 'c Address (City, Stale. ZIP) Home Phone Cell Phone Email 0 4748 Aberdeen Road, Mound, MN 55364 -- m Charge t. Statute /Ordinance # Charge 2: Statute /Ordinance # a Name (First Middle Last) Date of Age Sex Race Height Weight =Eyes S Hrvk. CC ° Address (City. Slate. Zip) Home Phone Cell Phone E -mail c o 4701 Aberdeen Road, Mound, MN 55364 _ d Charge 1: Statute /Ordinance # Charge 2 Statute /Ordinance # a Name (First Middle Las) Date of Birth Age Sex Race Height Weight Eyes Hair ° M 1 Kelly Bernadette Ladd _ 35 F W = — Home Phone Cell Phone Email Address (City, Stale, Zip) 0 9055 Tiller Ave. Young America, MN 55397 12 Char Stalule /Ordinance Charge 2 slaStatute/Ordinance # ger # o_ 0 Name (First Middle Last) Date of Birth Age Sex Race Height Wright Eyes Ha" °> c - Address (City. State, Zip) Home Phone Cell Phone E -mail ° E.2 Charge 1: Statute /Ordinance # Charge 2: Statute /Ordinance # °m Name (First Middle Last) Dale of Birth Age Sex Race Height Weight Eyes Hair ° Address (City. Slate. Zip) Home Phone Cell Phone E -mail y Charge 1: Statute /Ordinance # Charge 2 Statute/Ordinance # a r License # State Tab Yr Make Model Style Veh Yr Color VIN Number v Value Ql De cr'pl on / Idenl lying Numbers _ a n Formal Complaint Uate sent for charging Disposh,on Reported b9 Officer OPoCegs) Olfuer- Assigned Dale Supervisor - Approved Date 71ASsiistmg Swansor 0 vLt�- �..- -, PAGE 1 OF 21 L �- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFENSE REPORT NARRATIVE OFFICER: Swanson CASE NUMBER: 11 -1542 DATE: 06 -21 -2011 On 06 -21 -11 at 0937 hours, I, Officer Swanson, was advised by dispatch of a dog bite in pending at 4748 Aberdeen Rd. I contacted CSO Wocken as he was on duty but on another detail. Wocken advised me that CSO Spanjers would be on duty around 1230 hours and that he could follow -up on the matter. I called and talked to the RP, Blaine Henry Fiveland, DOB 4111M Blaine stated he was walking his dog in the 3200 block of Roanoke Lane when two dogs from 4701 Aberdeen Rd. came out onto the road and attacked his dog. Blaine stated he didn't actually own the dog and that a Kelly Bernadette Ladd, DOB owned the dog and that he watches the dog during the week. Blaine stated he took the dog to the Lake Minnetonka Animal Hospital as the dog had a puncture wound to the right front leg and a puncture would to the chin. Blaine stated the dog was limping bad. Blaine stated the dog is a chiwawa and miniature pinscher named Ruby. Blaine stated the vet bill came to $88.39. Blaine stated Ruby was given penicillin and anti - biotics. Blaine stated the two dogs that attacked Ruby looked like they were part pitbull. Blaine stated a male party was outside at 4701 Aberdeen Rd. when the dogs were outside. Blaine stated the male told Blaine the dogs would not hurt him when they started to approach him and Ruby on the street. Blaine stated the dogs then attacked Ruby. Blaine stated Ruby was on a leash at the time of the attack but stated she was able to get out of her collar and take off. Blaine stated he found Ruby back at his residence. Blaine stated he did not know the male who lived at 4701 Aberdeen Rd. and stated he believed the male lived wit his girlfriend at this location. Blaine did not know the name of the girlfriend. I advised Blaine I would take the initial report and I would have CSO Spanjers follow -up on the matter. Blaine stated he wanted the male party to pay for the vet bill for Ruby. I advised Blaine I would have Spanjers make contact with the owner of the dogs when he came on duty. I cleared at 1015 hours. Spanjers did follow up on the case and he issued the owner of the dogs, Brandon Michael Loycano, DO B041110, a potentially dangerous dog notice. Both dogs are currently licensed with the city. -1024- OFFENSE REPORT I PAGE 2 OF 2 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOLLOW -UP REPORT OFFICER: SPANJERS CASE NUMBER: 11 -1542 06/21/2011 On 06/21/2011 at approximately 1330 hours, I Phillip Spanjers, Community Service Officer at the Mound Police Department, made contact with Brandon Michael Loycano DOB: 411IMMat 4701 Aberdeen Rd Mound Mn 55364, in reference to a dog bite, see case number 11 -1542 for details. When I arrived on scene, I made contact with Brandon. Brandon was in the front yard with two brown American Stafford Shire Terriers also known as Pitbulls. Brandon was aware that both dogs left the property and attacked the RP's dog when unprovoked. I issued Brandon a Notice of Potentially Dangerous Dogs for both Pitbulls. I also advised Brandon to quarantine both dogs for 10 days. It should be noted that both dogs have current city licenses: number 163 and 164. Brandon was mailed a copy of the Potentially Dangerous Dog Notice for both Pitbulls. -1025- FOLLOW -UP REPORT I PAGE 1 OF 1 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Case number: Mound, MN 55364 Date of Issuance: o(U /d {aoll NOTICE OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG DOG OWNER: DESCRIPTION OF DOG: Name: 1 <6n-Dz Color: G(ovir, iSex: M Spayed/Neutered: (Ye No Breed nkrice, $-{54{,,J 51,,,T`rlic,t enselNumber: The above listed dog owner is hereby notified that the above listed dog is considered to be a Polewia!/yDangerous Dog as defined in Minnesota Statute 347.50. This classification is based upon reasonable cause that the dog has: when unprovoked, inflicted bites on a human or domestic animal on public or private property; (Case number. l J-15y:x. ) or when unprovoked, chased or approached a person upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public property in an apparent attitude of attack; (Case number ) or / a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals. (Case number I I- I5� 1 } Issuing Officer: Badge# o a Signature: �/ i � —/ Date: OC„Zal /ao(l Dog owners Signature if issued on scene); %f -/' Date: r,,</ —/% please be aware that this dog will be considered a Dangerous Dog within the meaning of Minn. Stat. 747.50, and must cornply with all requirements of said Statute, if the dog. Without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public crprivate properly; or • Killed a domestic animal without provocation while orl the owner's property; or • Has been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has notice that thedog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety orhumans or domesticanimals- -1026- N40UND POLICE DEPARTMENT 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Case number: if 15 ya-- Mound, MN 55364 Date of Issuance: v w / a, / dot NOTICE OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG DOG OWNER: DESCRIPTION OF DOG: Name: 1ndl Color: Btow� Sex: MO Spayed/Neutered: Ye No BreeOmeflcs� S r Aft- License Number. 163 The above listed dog owner is hereby notified that the above listed dog is considered to be a Potentially Dangerous Dog as defined in Minnesota Statute 347.50. This classification is based upon reasonable cause that the dog has: when unprovoked, inflicted bites on a human or domestic animal on public or private property; (Case number: ) or when unprovoked, chased or approached a person upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public property in an apparent attitude of attack; (Case number ) or a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threateningthe safety ofhumans or domestic animals. (Case number } Issuing Officer— Sp-,ntr CI Badge# 6 a- Signature: Date: 0( /,)L ( (ao11 Dog owners signature (if issued on sccne) � ��—"", Date: a Please be aware that this dog will be considered a Dongerou.r Dog within the meaning of Minn. Slat. 3-07.50, and must comply with all requirements of said Statute, if the dog: Without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property; or Killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the owner's property; or Iles been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has notice that thedog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, anaeks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. -1027- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Case number: 1 Mound, MN 55364 Date oflssuance: Cc:> /µt /aoq NOTICE OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG DOG OWNER: DESCRIPTION OF DOG: Name: Kt lls- Colcr:2(,Vj1 , Sex: M Spayed/Neutered: (P No Breed:Arklrlc„, s44-(,,J Sn,T` "it( c e+nosel N umber: The above listed dog owner is hereby notified that the above listed dog is considered to be a Po(en( rally Dangerous Dog as defined in Minnesota Statute 347.50. This classification is based upon reasonable cause that the dog has: when unprovoked, inflicted bites on a human or domestic animal on public or private property; (Case number: 11 -1 Sya, ) or when unprovoked, chased or approached a person upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public property in an apparent attitude of attack; (Case number ) or a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals, (Casen //umber 11-- I5go -- ) Issuing Officer: Badge b o Signature: �� /� / Date: DL, �d l /cZol) Dog owners signatwe (if ssued on scene) 111,%'6 j2��/�C� Date: Please be aware that this dog will be considered a Dangerous Dog within the meaning of Minn. Stat. 347.50, and must comply with all requirements of said Statute, if the dog: • Without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property; or • Killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the owner's property; or • Has been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has notice that thedog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. 1_: MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Case number: q-6— Mound, MN 55364 Date oflssuance: ob Lal NOTICE OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS DOG DOG OWNER: DESCRIPTION OF DOG: Name: � Y1 � Color: B (bw � Sex: MO Spayed INeutered: D No Breed:AWettt.ch S'< v`) 56b License Number: The above listed dog owner is hereby notified that the above listed dog is considered to be a Potentially Dangerous Dog as defined in Minnesota Statute 347.50. This classification is based upon reasonable cause that the dog has: when unprovoked, inflicted bites on a human or domestic animal on public or private property; (Case number: ) or _ when unprovoked, chased or approached a person upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public property in an apparent attitude of attack; (Case number ) or 1 a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals. (Case number ) Issuing Officer: S rtr i Badge# 6 ot-- Signature: Date: OG t I �°I Dog owners signature (ifissued on scene �� .� �� Date: Please bz aware that this dog will be considered a Uongerous Dog within the meaning of Minn. Stat. 347.50, and must comply with all requirements of said Statute, if the dog: Without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property; or Killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the owner's property; or Has been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has notice that thedog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domesticanimals. -1029- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT FOLLOW -UP REPORT OFFICER. WOCKEN CASE NUMBER: 11 -1542 DATE: 07/0112011 On 07/01/2011 1 called Brandon Loycano, the owner of the dogs, that attacked the other dog. Brandon stated that the dogs are doing fine and he will be putting them back on the electronic containment collars. Brandon informed me that he had reimbursed the dog owner for the vet expenses. I informed Brandon that the quarantine period is complete and the dogs can go back to normal status. I also went over the Potentially Dangerous Dog information and explained the Dangerous Dog restrictions, if his dogs were to have another bite. No further action needed. -1030- FOLLOW -UP REPORT I PAGE 1 OF 1 I MINNESOTA STATUTES 2014 347.50 347.50 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. Terms. For the purpose of sections 347.50 to 347.56, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Dangerous dog. "Dangerous dog" means any dog that has: (1) without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a human being on public or private property; (2) killed a domestic animal without provocation while off the owner's property; or (3) been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has notice that the dog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of humans or domestic animals. Subd. 3. Potentially dangerous dog. "Potentially dangerous dog" means any dog that: (1) when unprovoked, inflicts bites on a human or domestic animal on public or private property; (2) when unprovoked, chases or approaches a person, including a person on a bicycle, upon the streets, sidewalks, or any public or private property, other than the dog owner's property, in an apparent attitude of attack; or (3) has a known propensity, tendency, or disposition to attack unprovoked, causing injury or otherwise threatening the safety of humans or domestic animals. Subd. 4. Proper enclosure. "Proper enclosure" means securely confined indoors or in a securely enclosed and locked pen or structure suitable to prevent the animal from escaping and providing protection from the elements for the dog. A proper enclosure does not include a porch, patio, or any part of a house, garage, or other structure that would allow the dog to exit of its own volition, or any house or structure in which windows are open or in which door or window screens are the only obstacles that prevent the dog from exiting. Subd. 5. Owner. "Owner" means any person, firm, corporation, organization, or department possessing, harboring, keeping, having an interest in, or having care, custody, or control of a dog. Subd. 6. Substantial bodily harm. "Substantial bodily harm" has the meaning given it under section 609.02, subdivision 7a. Subd. 6a. Great bodily harm. "Great bodily harm" has the meaning given it under section 609.02, subdivision 8. Subd. 7. Animal control authority. "Animal control authority" means an agency of the state, county, municipality, or other governmental subdivision of the state which is responsible for animal control op- rations in its jurisdiction. E e . Subd. 8. Provocation. "Provocation" means an act that an adult could reasonably expect may cause a dog to attack or bite. History: 1988 c 711 s 1; 1989 c 37 s 3 -5; 1994 c 550 s 1; 1 Sp2001 c 8 art 8 s 14,15; 2008 c 325 s 2 Copyright O 2014 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1031- MINNESOTA STATUTES 2014 347,51 347.51 DANGEROUS DOGS; REGISTRATION. Subdivision 1. Requirement. No person may own a dangerous dog in this state unless the dog is registered as provided in this section. Subd. 2. Registration. An animal control authority shall issue a certificate of registration to the owner of a dangerous dog if the owner presents sufficient evidence that: (1) a proper enclosure exists for the dangerous dog and a posting on the premises with a clearly visible warning sign that there is a dangerous dog on the property, including a warning symbol to inform children; (2) a surety bond issued by a surety company authorized to conduct business in this state in a form acceptable to the animal control authority in the sum of at least $300,000, payable to any person injured by the dangerous dog, or a policy of liability insurance issued by an insurance company authorized to conduct business in this state in the amount of at least $300,000, insuring the owner for any personal injuries inflicted by the dangerous dog; (3) the owner has paid an annual fee of not more than $500, in addition to any regular dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a dangerous dog under this section, and (4) the owner has had microchip identification implanted in the dangerous dog as required under section 347.515. Subd. 2a. Warning symbol. If an animal control authority issues a certificate of registration to the owner of a dangerous dog pursuant to subdivision 2, the animal control authority must provide, for posting on the owner's property, a copy of a warning symbol to inform children that there is a dangerous dog on the property. The warning symbol must be the uniform symbol provided by the commissioner of public safety. The commissioner shall provide the number of copies of the warning symbol requested by the animal control authority and shall charge the animal control authority the actual cost of the warning symbols received. The animal control authority may charge the registrant a reasonable fee to cover its administrative costs and the cost of the warning symbol. Subd. 3. Fee. The animal control authority may charge the owner an annual fee, in addition to any regular dog licensing fees, to obtain a certificate of registration for a dangerous dog under this section. Subd. 3a. Dangerous dog designation review. Beginning six months after a dog is declared a dangerous dog, an owner may request annually that the animal control authority review the designation. The owner must provide evidence that the dog's behavior has changed due to the dog's age, neutering, environment, completion of obedience training that includes modification of aggressive behavior, or other factors. If the animal control authority finds sufficient evidence that the dog's behavior has changed, the authority may rescind the dangerous dog designation. Subd. 4. Law enforcement; exemption. The provisions of this section do not apply to dangerous dogs used by law enforcement officials for police work. Subd. 5. Exemption. Dogs may not be declared dangerous if the threat, injury, or damage was sustained by a person: (1) who was committing, at the time, a willful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by the owner of the dog; Copyright © 2014 by the Revisor of Statutes. State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1032- 347.51 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2014 (2) who was provoking, tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog or who can be shown to have re- peatedly, in the past, provoked, tormented, abused, or assaulted the dog, or (3) who was committing or attempting to commit a crime. Subd. 6. [Repealed, ISp2001 c 8 art 8 s 30] Subd. 7. Tag. A dangerous dog registered under this section must have a standardized, easily identifiable tag identifying the dog as dangerous and containing the uniform dangerous dog symbol, affixed to the dog's collar at all times. Subd. 8. Local ordinances. A statutory or home rule charter city, or a county, may not adopt an ordinance regulating dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs based solely on the specific breed of the dog. Ordinances inconsistent with this subdivision are void. Subd. 9. Contracted services. An animal control authority may contract with another political sub- division or other person to provide the services required under sections 347.50 to 347.565. Notwithstanding any contract entered into under this subdivision, all fees collected under sections 347.50 to 347.54 shall be paid to the animal control authority and all certificates of registration must be issued in the name of the animal control authority. History: 1988 c 711 s 2, 1989 c 37 s 6 -10; 1991 c 195 s 1; 1994 c 550 s 2; 1997 c 187 art 3 s 32; 1 Sp2001 c 8 art 8 s 16 -18; 2008 c 325 s 3 -7 Copyright 0 2014 by the Revisor of Statutes State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1033- MINNESOTA STATUTES 2014 347.52 347.52 DANGEROUS DOGS; REQUIREMENTS. (a) An owner of a dangerous dog shall keep the dog, while on the owner's property, in a proper enclosure. If the dog is outside the proper enclosure, the dog must be muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash and under the physical restraint of a responsible person. The muzzle must be made in a manner that will prevent the dog from biting any person or animal but that will not cause injury to the dog or interfere with its vision or respiration. (b) An owner of a dangerous dog must renew the registration of the dog annually until the dog is deceased. If the dog is removed from the jurisdiction, it must be registered as a dangerous dog in its new jurisdiction. (c) An owner of a dangerous dog must notify the animal control authority in writing of the death of the dog or its transfer to a new location where the dog will reside within 30 days of the death or transfer, and must, if requested by the animal control authority, execute an affidavit under oath setting forth either the circumstances of the dog's death and disposition or the complete name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom the dog has been transferred or the address where the dog has been relocated. (d) An animal control authority shall require a dangerous dog to be sterilized at the owner's expense. If the owner does not have the animal sterilized within 30 days, the animal control authority shall seize the dog and have it sterilized at the owner's expense. (e) A person who owns a dangerous dog and who rents property from another where the dog will reside must disclose to the property owner prior to entering the lease agreement and at the time of any lease renewal that the person owns a dangerous dog that will reside at the property. (f) A person who transfers ownership of a dangerous dog must notify the new owner that the animal control authority has identified the dog as dangerous. The current owner must also notify the animal control authority in writing of the transfer of ownership and provide the animal control authority with the new owner's name, address, and telephone number. History: 1988 c 711 s 3; ISp2001 c 8 art 8 s 20; 2008 c 325 s 8 Copyright © 2014 by the Revisor of Stntotea State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1034- Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: April 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 15 -02 Conditional Use Permit Amendment - The Landings on Lost Lake REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Mark Saliterman of Lost Lake Homes & Marina, has applied for an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development approved as The Landings on Lost Lake project in 2013. The applicant is requesting to make modifications to the exterior design of the 4 -unit and 3 -unit buildings on the site. While no changes are being made to the plat for the property, an amendment to the CUP is needed as the existing CUP references design elements of the development that are being proposed to be changed. The attached Planning Report summarizes the proposed changes. PUBLIC HEARING City Code Section 129 -38 requires that a public hearing be held by the City Council for review of a conditional use permit. The public hearing notice was published in the Laker on April 11, 2015 and was also mailed to all affected property owners, according to Hennepin County tax records, located within 350 feet of the subject site on April 16, 2015. The notice was also posted on the City Hall bulletin board on April 3, 2015. -1035- PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their April 7, 2015 meeting. No members of the public spoke at the meeting. Staff did receive a phone call prior to the Planning Commission meeting expressing concern about the request. The neighbor was particularly interested in seeing the continued use of stone on the front facades. The Planning Commission discussed this comment with the applicant. The applicant indicated that one primary reason for the proposed change away from the stone is that these facades only have small areas of stone immediately adjacent the garage doors and the applicant believes this will not be as durable. The applicant indicated the facades will continue to have multiple colors /tones to help break up the building mass and fit with the other buildings in the development. After the discussion, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously for approval of the CUP amendment. The draft minutes have been included for your reference. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The City's deadline for action on the application related to the 60 -day rule was April 27, 2014. Therefore, as provided by Minnesota Statutes 15.99, Subd. 3 (f), the City, on April 22, 2015, executed a 60 -day extension for action on the application. The City's new deadline for action on the CUP is June 26, 2015. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. Staff has also prepared First Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement as the new building plans must also be referenced. The resolution authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the First Amendment. -1036- RESOLUTION NO. 15 -. RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE WHEREAS, the applicant, Lost Lake Homes & Marina, has submitted application for an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for planned unit development (PUD) as part of the The Landings on Lost Lake plat as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the applicant has provided the City with adequate assurances that he has complied with any legal requirements of The Lost Lake Association to undertake the application; and WHEREAS, the subject site is located along Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) in downtown Mound and the property was previously platted as part of the Villas on Lost Lake plat in 2005, the Villas on Lost Lake 2nd Addition in 2006, and the Landings on Lost Lake in 2013; and WHEREAS, as part of the previous approvals, Resolutions No. 05 -80 and 13 -51 were adopted and approved a conditional use permit for the site; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking to amend previous approvals to modify the exterior design of the residential homes; and WHEREAS, the applicant and the City previously entered into a Subdivision Agreement for The Landings on Lost Lake that was recorded and is of record. In the Subdivision Agreement for the Landings on Lost Lake, the applicant is referred to as "subdivider "; and WHEREAS, Section 4 of the Subdivision Agreement describes the applicant's obligations to construct the site according to certain approved building plans; and WHEREAS, the applicant desires to construct Units 1 -9 in accordance with the approved plans received by the City on March 22, 2013 and to construct Units 10 -16 in accordance with the plans received by the City on January 22, 2015; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested conditional use permit for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Report dated April 3, 2015 , as well as in the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and -1037- WHEREAS, the proposed exterior design changes continue to be in harmony with the purposes and intent of the Pedestrian District in both the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed exterior design changes will still be in keeping with the character of the surrounding Villas on Lost Lake neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the conditional use permit application at its April 7, 2015 meeting and recommended Council approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its April 28, 2015 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed conditional use permit application; and WHEREAS, the City has considered the proposed project as it might affect public health, safety or welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the request, taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinance and other official controls; WHEREAS, the application was submitted and deemed to be complete on or around February 26, 2014. "Day 1" for the purpose of the application of the 60 -day rule in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 15.99 was February 27, 2015. As provided by Minnesota Statutes 15.99, Subd. 3 (f), the City, on April 22, 2015, executed a 60 -day extension for action on the application. The City's new deadline for action on the CUP is June 26, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the CUP application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota 15.99; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for The Landings on Lost Lake Planned Unit Development, based on the following findings of fact: a. The Landings on Lost Lake is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. b. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. c. The proposed changes to the exterior design of the three and four unit buildings are in keeping with development intent of the neighborhood. r 2. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the Planned Unit Development subject to the following conditions: a. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the Conditional Use Permit application. b. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. c. Applicant is responsible for determining and undertaking an amendment, if needed, to the CIC Declaration for the Villas on Lost Lake Association related to the amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the Landings on Lost Lake. 3. The conditional use permit is hereby approved for the following property as described on the attached Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that the City Manager and Mayor are authorized and directed to enter into the First Amendment of the Subdivision Agreement for The Landings on Lost Lake in substantially the same form as Exhibit B. The City Attorney is authorized to make any required revisions and/or changes to the First Amendment that are keeping with the intent of this Resolution. Adopted this 28th day of April 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -1039- Exhibit A CIS mmm EI, FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT ( "First Amendment') dated as of the _ day of 2015, by and between the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and Lost Lake Homes and Marina, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ( "Subdivider "). RECITALS WHEREAS, City approved a Subdivision Agreement entered into that certain Subdivision Agreement on , 2013 ( "Agreement') for the property legally described on the attached Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof ( "Subject Property "); and WHEREAS, City and Subdivider wish to amend a term of the Agreement as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and obligations contained herein, City and Subdivider agrees as follows: Section 4 is amended to read as follows: Development Plan. Units 1 -9 located on the Subject Property will be developed in accordance with the Site Development Plans received by the City on March 22, 2013, copies of which are on file with the City. Units 10 -14 located on the Subject Property will be developed in accordance with the Site Development Plans received by the City on January 22, 2015, copies of which are on file with the City. If the Site Development Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. 2. Except as specifically noted in this First Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. -1042- 460332v2 MJM MU200 -171 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands the day and year first above written. CITY OF MOUND Mark Wegscheid, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) an Kandis Hanson, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, by Mark Wegscheid, Mayor, and Kandis Hanson, City Manager, of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public LOST LAKE HOMES AND MARINA, LLC By: Mark Saliterman Its: Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, by Mark Saliterman, its Chief Manager, on behalf of the company. Notary Public Drafted by: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (mjm) 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 5540 -1043- 460332v2 MJM MU200 -171 [insert] Exhibit A Legal Description of Subject Property -1044- Bank Consent ( "Bank ") holds a mortgage encumbering the Subject Property as described in the First Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement. The Subject Property is subject to the foregoing First Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement and, accordingly, Bank hereby consents to the First Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement; provided, that in doing so, Bank shall not be liable to the City or any other person for the performance or non - performance of the First Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement by the Subdivider; provided further, that in the event that Bank acquires fee title to the Subject Property by foreclosure or sale in lieu of foreclosure, Bank shall not be required to perform any of the obligations required of the Subdivider in said First Amendment to the Subdivision Agreement during the Bank's term of ownership so long as Bank is actively marketing the Subject Property for sale and maintaining the Subject Property in compliance with applicable ordinances. Dated: , 20_ C Its: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR BANK STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF 20 , The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11 the on behalf of the under the laws of Notary Public day of of [Subdivider to provide the required consents to the City, if applicable at any time] -1045 - B-2 460332v2 MJM MU200 -171 ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, Jennifer Peterson, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone (7:02), and Pete Wiechert. Members absent: David Goode and Jason Baker. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Mark and Beth Saliterman, 4725 Hwy 7, St Louis Park BOARD OF APPEALS A. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit — "The Landings on Lost Lake" Planning Case No. 15 -02 Applicant: Mark Saliterman Trapp reviewed the history of previous approvals and related issues. The current application is strictly an amendment addressing an exterior design change for the 3 unit and 4 unit buildings. Smieja pointed out that the plat drawings provided in the packet do not match current conditions. Staff confirmed. Saliterman (applicant) explained that the reason they were changing design was to cut down on costs on the exterior to keep the better quality on the inside. Additional landscaping is anticipated. Because of the closeness of the 3 building and 4 building the sides will not be visible. The height was changed to open the view of the commercial area and bring more light between the commercial space and the homes. It will also provide a nice little lane for those leaving the coffee shop. Stone asked what the impact was on price. Saliterman anticipates that it will save about $4,000 to $5,000 per unit, which will help finance the landscape buffer. Price point will be at about $350,000 for these smaller (1,000 SF) units; $575,000 to $675,000 for the larger (2,300 SF) units. Bergquist commented that the amount of stone wasn't that much. Saliterman agreed but said that the installation and detailing is labor intensive. Trapp asked if he would address the color scheme. Saliterman replied that the color scheme is the same as proposed. He said there would be some texture interest and coordinated color scheme between the first and second floor. MOTION by Bergquist, second by Gawtry, to approve the amendment with conditions 1 -3. MOTION carried unanimously. -1046- DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: PC MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director April 3, 2015 15 -02 Conditional Use Permit Mark Saliterman, Lost Lake Homes & Marina 5441 -5495 Lost Lake Lane (The landings on Lost Lake) April 7, 2015 Pedestrian District Pedestrian District Planned Unit Development r1-r -1117r BACKGROUND The applicant, Mark Saliterman of Lost Lake Homes & Marina, has applied for an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a Planned Unit Development approved as The Landings on Lost Lake project in 2013. The applicant is requesting to make modifications to the design of the 4 -unit and 3 -unit buildings on the site. While no changes are being made to the plat for the property, an amendment to the CUP is needed as the existing CUP references design elements of the development that are being proposed to be changed. HISTORY AND PREVIOUS APPROVALS The development of the Lost Lake District is part of the larger redevelopment initiative for Downtown Mound called Mound Visions. The Mounds Visions' Lost Lake Addition was originally platted by Mound Harbor Renaissance in 2005. In the original Villas on Lost Lake plat, the developer proposed 37 townhomes and a 12,500 square foot commercial building for the 3.64 acre site. The property was replatted in 2006 as Villas on the Lost lake 2nd Addition to slightly modify property lines, including a small addition to the plat of about 260 square feet. In 2013, approximately 1.1 acres of the site was replatted as The Landings on Lost Lake. The replat reduced the number of remaining homes to be constructed from 26 to 16. The layout of the housing units remained generally the same. -1047- The Landings on Lost Lake CUP Amendment Planning Report In addition to plat revisions, amendments to the CUP were approved in 2007 to reduce the commercial building size to 3,003 SF and create two tenant spaces. An amendment in 2011 split the west space into two so the building could accommodate a total of three tenants. Development on the site to date has included 15 townhomes and the commercial building which is currently fully occupied by Caribou Coffee, Sir Knight Cleaners, and Larson Chiropractic. Site development activities completed as part of the project have included the creation of two wetlands, establishment of a wetland buffer, construction of the Lost Lake Greenway, overall site grading, installation of private utilities, and construction of the private road. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS Criteria. In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed land use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Sec. 129 - 38(a) includes the conditional use permit review criteria. Procedure. Sec. 129 -38 (c) requires that all requests for conditional use permits and amendments are reviewed by the Planning Commission. Sec. 129 -38 (c) also requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the planning agency and /or governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for conditional use permits and further requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. Members are advised that the public hearing for review of the CUP amendment is scheduled to be held by the City Council on Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. TIMELINE Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60 -day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, "Day 1" was determined to be February 27, 2015 as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 645.15. The City's deadline for action on the CUP application is on or around April 27, 2015. Members are advised that the City will be executing a 60 -day extension as allowed by statute. -1048 - Page 2 April 3, 2015 The Landings on Lost Lake CUP Amendment Planning Report CITY DEPARTMENT / CONSULTANT / AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the requests and supporting materials were forwarded to involved Staff, consultants, and affected agencies on March 10, 2015. Staff received a comment from Amanda Bednar of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District indicating that the 2013 permit has expired and would need to be renewed prior to construction commencing for this project. Staff has received confirmation from the MCWD that the permit for the Landings project was renewed. DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL REVIEW The City of Mound uses the Conditional Use Permit as the regulatory tool for establishing the dimension and design standards for a planned unit development (PUD). The previous approvals for the site established design standards that will continue to apply for this project, particularly since the remainder of the site was built under those regulations. The applicant has indicated that the proposed revisions are in an effort to reduce costs so that the price point for the 1,000 square foot units can be more marketable. The intention is to have all 7 of the units in the two buildings nearly identical in design. The types of exterior materials and color scheme will remain as was originally proposed, though the materials will be used in slightly different ways. The applicant is proposing to use 4 -inch LP Smart Side siding on all sides of the buildings. Previously the applicant had proposed to use the siding on the first floor and shakes on the second floor. Board and batton will continue to be used on the upper story window dormer on the front and on the sides. The front facade has been further modified by removing the proposed stone around the garage on the first floor and a bracket proposed on the second floor. While these changes seem reasonable to reduce costs, Staff requests the applicant give consideration to changes in color if the materials are going to remain predominantly the same from one wall to the next. Particular attention should be given to areas in the public view or where there are large expanses of wall, such as the ends of the units. The rear fa4ade will be modified by the removal of the rear door and the replacement of it with a small window. The applicant is also proposing to remove the proposed outdoor kitchen for each unit and spacing the columns evenly across the back of each unit. The applicant is also proposing to change the slope of the roof from a 6/12 pitch to a 5/12 pitch. This change will reduce the overall height of the structures. HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION REVIEW The applicant has provided to the City assurances that the requirements of the Common Interest Community (CIC) and Homeowners' Association have been met in applying for an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit. ffl.. April 3, 2015 Page 3 The Landings on Lost Lake CUP Amendment Planning Report ADDITIONAL COMMENTS • To date, (4) townhome units in The Landings of Lost Lake project have been constructed. An open house which includes members of the City Council, Staff and the City's Commissions was held on April 1, 2014. • On April 2, the City sent mailed notification about the April 7th Planning Commission meeting and review of the submitted CUP application to property owners in the Lost Lake District. Staff is evaluating whether the Subdivision Agreement for the Landings on Lost Lake needs to be amended to reference the modified plans for the 3- unit and 4 -unit buildings. RECOMMENDATION If the Planning Commission recommends the proposed changes to the Conditional Use Permit, the following are conditions that should be included with the recommendation: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the conditional use permit application. 2. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 3. if applicable, the Subdivision Agreement be amended to identify the modified plans approved with the conditional use permit amendment. CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, It is anticipated that the request will be considered by the City Council at their April 28, 2015 meeting which will include a public hearing. -1050- April 3, 2015 Page 4 A �tourlD 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 - 472 -0620 ePQl- :�Xo CO USE PERMIT ( APPLICATION AND Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application, Planning Commission Case No. Please a or rintthe following Information: Y SubjectAddrass Insj- I ake an+? ION � U Description of Proposed Use: Change in architectural Design of townhomes previously Conditional Use Permit Info (1/2/2015) Page 4 of 5 approved in 2013. -1051- N/A emeof 8u31ness LEGAL ON Lots) T -8. 2 -10, 1 -9.. Block 1, 3, 4 subdl,4sldnVillasbn the Lake 2nd Addition:.plo, See attached T Theapplicantis:Owner X otner_Eman mark @scpate,am.COM ' Name Mark Saliterman, UiPf'Maha6er Address. 4725 Highway 7, St. Louis Park; MN 55416 tH Phone Home 952 - 544 -4446 Work 952- 920 -8555 ceq 612=718 -8282 E -Mail Address marks cpateim. com Fax 952 - 955 -8455 Name Lost Lake Homes & Marina LLC Ema Address 4725 Highway/ 7, St. Louis Park, MN 65416 N/A ., .. Phone Hame„ . _..._W. ark Name Alexander �Destgn, Group Inca Emall N /ASURVEYCT, 401 East Lake Street;" Wayzata, MN 55391 SURVEYOR, Address OR ENGINEER Phone office 952- 473 -8777 cell N/A Fax 952- 473 -8222 ZONING Circle: R -1 R -1A R -2 R -3 B -1 B -2 DISTRICT -' Zoning_ is PED -PUD Y SubjectAddrass Insj- I ake an+? ION � U Description of Proposed Use: Change in architectural Design of townhomes previously Conditional Use Permit Info (1/2/2015) Page 4 of 5 approved in 2013. -1051- Planning Commission. Case No. 15 L) Z' EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smokefodor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. To undertake changes in exterior appearance to blend with other area townhomes and to reduce costs. If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ 1.4 mi 11 i on Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? «) yes, () no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Various Application must be signed by al! owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this Is not the case. Mark Saliterman � �J~ Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signa ure Date Lost Lake Homes & Marina LLC Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Chief Manager Date Print owner's Name Owner's Signature Date City Code Section 129 -38 relating to Conditional Use Permits must be reviewed by the applicant. If applying for a two family dwelling, City Code Section 129 -102 must be reviewed by the applicant. Conditional Use Permit Info (1/2/2015) Page 5 of 5 -1052- t i -1053- VILLAS ON THE LAKE god ADDITION PID # Block Lot I 1 PID # 1311724330129 Street Address 5495 Lost Lake Lane Lot 1311724330130 5493 Lost Lake Lane Lot 1311724330131 5491 Lost Lake Lane Lot 4 1311724330132 5489 Lost Lake Lane Lot I311724330133 5487 Lost Lake Lane Lot 6 1311724330134 5485 Lost Lake Lane Lot 7 1311724330135 5483 Lost Lake Lane Lot 8 1311724330136 5481 Lost Lake Lane Block 3 Lot 1311724340133 5441 Lost Lake Lane Lot 3 1311724340134 5443 Lost Lake Lane Lot 4 1311724340135 5445 Lost Lake Lane Lot 5 1311724340136 5447 Lost Lake Lane Lot 6 1311724340137 5449 Lost Lake Lane Lot 7 1311724340138 5451 Lost Lake Lane Lot 8 1311724340139 5453 Lost Lake Lane Lot 9 1311724340140 5457 Lost Lake Lane Lot 10 1311724340141 5459 Lost Lake Lane Block 4 Lot 1 1311724330145 5479 Lost Lake Lane Lot 2 1311724330146 5475 Lost Lake Lane Lot3 1311724330147 5473 Lost Lake Lane Lot 4 1311724330148 5471 Lost Lake Lane Lot 5 1311724330149 5469 Lost Lake Lane Lot 6 1311724330150 5467 Lost Lake Lane Lot 7 1311724330151 - - 5465 LostZake Lane Lot 8 1311724330152 5463 Lost Lake Lane Lot 9 1311724330153 5461 Lost Lake Lane -1053- Received 3 -26 -2095 Dear City Council of Mound, Staff, Legal Counsel and the Owners of The Lost Lake Association. I have applied to the city for some changes to the 7 units I intend to build south of the Shopping area. There will be a meeting of the Planning and the City Council where these changes will be discussed. 1 have discussed these changes at the last full meeting of the Association and at the last Board meeting. The changes I have requested are as follows: Removed outdoor kitchen, Removed a minor amount of stone from the front. Removed the phantom screen at the rear of the garage. Eliminated a bracket on the upper level. Changed the slope of the roof. This should improve the light between the buildings. The outside materials have not changed but the areas where they are being used was adjusted. The color scheme will stay the same In an effort to continue transparency at the Association level I wanted to make sure everyone knew of the changes and the meetings. I personally do not think these minor changes require all this red tape but the City does. I did tell the City that I still have 16 out of 27 votes but I would hope we are not put in a time crunch where this advantage had to be used. I hope you all support what I am trying to do. We do have one existing unit under contract at a price in excess of $600,000 that we expect to close within the next month or so. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. If I missed anyone I do apologize and please pass it on. Thanks Mark Saliterman -1054- leeplad In the SW 1/4 of ,3. Twp kga 2. LOST LAKE HOMES AND MARINA, LLC House Address: Lost Lake Lane, Mound, MN 9}g1 xellontl iqn -� J 335.1 x or, FOP nB aRltE ly _ Relcinln9 wall BENCHMARK Carlson McCain Inc, Control Point — Spike located between Lot 4, Block I & Lot 1, Block 2: Elev. _ 93154 (NGVD 29) 'C' Denotes Existing Hydrant O Denotes Existing Electric Box Denotes Existing Television Box 10e Denotes Existing Telephone Box w, Denotes Existing Light Pole ea Denotes Existing Sell" 000.0 Denotes Exlating Elevation ", Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Direction of Drainage Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement (par recorded plat) —e— Denotes Iron Monument Bearings shown are assumed GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 l l I (IN FEET) rl } i ENNRGNaWNTAL�oNGINEERING •SURVEYbK 248 Apollo On Suite 100, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Phone: 753-4094900 Fax: 763- 489 -7959 Total Lot Areo - 16.561 as R_ Ifoaaa. Pprnn, x e e 0 ex a :3,000 sg. a. Driveway Areas t Rght f Wvy L ±1,234 be R. Total lmyxnou --- ±4,234 a4,. ft. Total Impvrv,voa Coverage - - -. - ±64.59 \_ — _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ — IOO R Olke\ 9EN rNMPRK _ t \ ID fi � loo 9}e.e To Io_o v 4136 -car 934 a 25182 28.81 „ alxc _ 9J5 0 I �� Y20' 9151 L 9}5.0 n, ws, SS SF "It � � ® %/ EL' 9367 pD _ Yap' �L„ZPa3E0 'Rue" ? y 1 }" �CM4` ;,!PAT __ 9XBS2 }ash CL?s.> n 231, m.JyJ 6Tj� �T, NCARAG( +. G4940E G OJS6n I > 0.P4aL' [�je 4J 1p.p n an,.1 0 eENaMARK ioo aF SpIKE 1 2 3 K /3 e EL . 9 }5.19 sv Z RR�as£a IO PROPO "ca _ Too ORgpfWF SL IIN aB M Rap OME R ",,,Par E 93513L� 93.1 .55 3 9}g1 xellontl iqn -� J 335.1 x or, FOP nB aRltE ly _ Relcinln9 wall BENCHMARK Carlson McCain Inc, Control Point — Spike located between Lot 4, Block I & Lot 1, Block 2: Elev. _ 93154 (NGVD 29) 'C' Denotes Existing Hydrant O Denotes Existing Electric Box Denotes Existing Television Box 10e Denotes Existing Telephone Box w, Denotes Existing Light Pole ea Denotes Existing Sell" 000.0 Denotes Exlating Elevation ", Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Direction of Drainage Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement (par recorded plat) —e— Denotes Iron Monument Bearings shown are assumed GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 l l I (IN FEET) rl } i ENNRGNaWNTAL�oNGINEERING •SURVEYbK 248 Apollo On Suite 100, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Phone: 753-4094900 Fax: 763- 489 -7959 Total Lot Areo - 16.561 as R_ Ifoaaa. Pprnn, x e e 0 ex a :3,000 sg. a. Driveway Areas t Rght f Wvy L ±1,234 be R. Total lmyxnou --- ±4,234 a4,. ft. Total Impvrv,voa Coverage - - -. - ±64.59 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots L 2 and 3, Block 3, THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE, Hennep(n County, Minnesota *SLAB ON GRADE PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS Top of Foundation Elevation: 936,2 Geroge Slab Direction (at door): 9357 NOTES: 1, eonlramar mast —4, ml house mmen>iona and > ar dth. 2. Drivewnya shown one for graphic purposes only ep Final driveway design and location to be determined by owner /phkar. I hereby certify to Out Lake and Marino, LOG that the survey, plan or report was prepored by me or under my direct and that I am o duly licensed land su -yal under the law, of the State of Ninoe501o. Dated this 281h day of Jammrv. 2015. -1055- �pN'n Maaain, In / �w By No, 516]6 R C i e� N m m m r m D y 2 {3i rw w w L•} 6d ;A 4r n W EA z� N_ 0 m m r m a a h �� ; �� "�s s �� g`R fA (r m r T r 8 A A r g ACD ry m r V I tff gg eo€ � ��oE p3 B w W� THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE - wrtS w -u vase+ T I } ) ! . $ 0 . /. ; j� _LAN »_ \�,w _, , � 2 ] ) 9 On � RUP �b. r i- E i �v 0 / ff 0 / u' O G - r pry @ g ? s / \V AV °, 1V ra A\ -• V ss 33 T o ff s` �e,..y di �'.PFOPOSC0 ovmw0ues -'�i os / i> =pNru° 0 / u' O G - r � / \V AV °, 1V ra A\ -• V ar 4i s` �e,..y di �'.PFOPOSC0 ovmw0ues -'�i os / i> =pNru° SUE '-3 tsJ 'd C" a SITE PLAN EXHIBIT Carlson LOST LAKE HOMES AND MARINA, LLC 4725 _1060_ McCain as Highway 7 N \ 5t Louis Park, MN, 55916 I ¢xwwumiet lust eINB � suaanxc THE LANDINGS OF LOST LAKE z95 aoolI or, suite 100, Lau izkez, MM 55019 M 011!1(1, Minnesota Pnone: 763- 909-7900 Fax: 763 -4H9 -]959 0 / u' O � / \V AV °, 1V ra A\ -• V ar 4i r / 8 0= > d I' = I o r 9 / Fa 76 / ---------- SUE '-3 tsJ 'd C" a SITE PLAN EXHIBIT Carlson LOST LAKE HOMES AND MARINA, LLC 4725 _1060_ McCain as Highway 7 N \ 5t Louis Park, MN, 55916 I ¢xwwumiet lust eINB � suaanxc THE LANDINGS OF LOST LAKE z95 aoolI or, suite 100, Lau izkez, MM 55019 M 011!1(1, Minnesota Pnone: 763- 909-7900 Fax: 763 -4H9 -]959 Located in the SW ,/9 of N Certificate of Survey for: eC ,3. TWp i17, Pge 21 LOST LAKE HOMES AND MARINA, LLC House Address: Lost Lake Lane, Mound, MN _ — — _ _ _ _ — — — _ _ _ _ _ ea.a n orna \ ENwuaBx _ _ EL�9N.16 \11 .VJ /r Lnl u_ Lrr. L \ 1 a ^30.0 \ �d.z ?j �s3?a 834.] qae\_; sea.o sxeS88i 6'18 "E s3ds tC 9]d,6 X , B;sTO / ;2 25.82 25.82 25.72 n is al aJ{ "a65F exB teX 9]6P 3 _ 1 ; Aa' ` ` p Y20 ^tla' as- nv° I Led, a ��_o`n Owga 000r" 2 o -1 1 \ / /// C4e9 CE 9J CRR9 CF 935.0 C4fldCf aJd` as, 9>S{ ry e�35.1 CI J F o a 6 � e° b n (0 u 3]:9 Of, "'of � A fl�6'� CRgpE�f 9]SP]� aR raimCf F fl34B,, )o1H/flaME RSL4e n I F ILHM4Bx 1,-/ / B36e cR4oE 935 < (;j 835.63 , 1) o' a ASSR n 935.1 035. �I a 'Eoo, CM \ ��E aEG' DfCM 9]9.9 x 93] 5 J336 oe;,.t � _ wellaed ai'n� x x33e6 dJ. d.6 12.anorlxe _93!9x 84 n "32.1 t 4 Si 'z" r9 at -� "3e BENCIIMAPN 40.2-y _ 9° - ,aP aF SvlxE v33.a 1 9AO 9 >. CL wls4 N86 °41'26'W T — _ `- seam:,' wm BENCHMARK Carlson McCain Inc, Control Point - Spike focated between Lot 4, Block I & Lot I, Block 2: Elev. zo 933.54 (NGVD 29) m? Denotes Existing Hydrant p Denotes Existing Electric Box Denotes Existing Television Box 0 Denotes Existing Telephone Box To; Denotes Existing Light Pole %' Denotes Existing Service x 000a Denotes Existing Elevation ",aom Denotes Proposed Vormtion - Denotes Direction of Drainage Debates Drainage & Utility Easement (per recorded plat) —a Denotes Iran Monument Bearings shown are assumed GRAPHIC SCALE o ID 20 40 (IN FEET) rl ENVIRONMENTAL•ENa1 ... onor•wtalo ING 248 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, ono [ekes, MN 55014 phone: 763- 489 -7900 Fax: 763 - 469 -7959 Talol Lot Area 27,255 sq.11. House Porch k C d Deco A t4, 013 sq.lf. -- Drivewoy Areas to flgbf of Way Line 21,655 pero Total Im n 25,bfiE act. it. Totat lm s"I' C verage - firs' LUAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 4, 5, 6 Ae 7, Block 3, THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE, Hennepin County, Minnesota e SLAB ON GRADE e PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS Top of Fcundation Elevation: 936.2 Garage Slab E motion (at door): 9351 NOTES: 1. Contractor must ee,ify all heuae oonenslons and eewer 1.01 2. Driveways shown are for graphic purposes only Rnal driveway design and locoban to be determined by owner/builder. I hereby certify to Last Lake and Hamm. LLC that thls s veg plan or report soe p,a,c,ed by me or under my direct end that I am a duly licensed land su veyor under the lows of the Stale of Minnesota. Dated this gem day el Jor - -- —" -1061- Signed risen McCain, Inc. By No. 51676 x AM dlm m t v m m N r D y 2 r �k V 4 ! 9 z� 8 y mod r YV� N J;d l.d i t y_ V RyyR70 F� a O m m r m D 4 2 F I €p lm r y@y1 :5 I 61' T 4(� m 8r A Y g DoE u Rtu 7 (� THE LANDIN25 ON L05T LAKE '1064- W�� •roµ •.� q ��a,�m zmis s;,[`'� �1 1'' Ii813.'b vE41rt'£i w,cve °° 9C V 94 "° 5 �E. i - § ! { � § | � 2 § ) � H 111,11,11 !m 7 q � � � � , THE /u LAN DI25 . N « _106 / - _, _ 3 e._ /d y a Y a ^F/ p m 1 C° ^ '1 e L, eEa }P mA � y p• Gg $ e is E� � � g✓ j! !? } e � � Y 6 �•p ae ° � c - T €• y so d / x h\ s � -� -�- Ca rls n ' r ��eW'64e9 / � 1 � \ O ./ c +pFWOSFD oMXHWes f / / N /f.\>��+ � a ; - - -m�." "�r,r' Mkt •✓ /` ,LOST MOOfId, Minnesota ...L4 ppone: Jfi3 <B9J90a Fax, ]63AB9J959 Fn. b d f E b d b[ d b b 3 8 E b Y s � -� -�- Ca rls n ' r ��eW'64e9 / � 1 � \ O ./ c +pFWOSFD oMXHWes f / / N /f.\>��+ � a ; - - -m�." "�r,r' Mkt •✓ /` ,LOST MOOfId, Minnesota ...L4 ppone: Jfi3 <B9J90a Fax, ]63AB9J959 Fn. s ` 1 a e v ao l txl I � I bp (' I I L —1— I s SITE PLAN EXHIBIT LOST LAKE HOMES AND MARINA, LLC -1066- Ca rls n I 485 HI9M1way � \ SC Lo WS pack, MN, 554Y6 THE LANDINGS LAKE [xnxwuw *nt [xcM[cwo suacsnx4 Lakes, MN x4e aonuo o., 5891-79M N ,LOST MOOfId, Minnesota ...L4 ppone: Jfi3 <B9J90a Fax, ]63AB9J959 Fn. t b 19 i� ap n� Z Cv Y b Z mr� m b HE LANDINGS ON L0ST LAKE E7- wire a - w _..._....- -.._.. - -1067— EA aM y_ W !m� P m M I D y i F 1 D m r y gx L l�Ti Drawing Submitted in 2013 U �o 3p� m nl �o s��llllllllll�� °� ®� a : l - - -; • 11 v r r T LA011 N LOST LAKE -1 068- O O III A - - - --I I I 4 I Drawing Submitted in 2013 I0 "W X 48.44T X 36° FROJ BRACKET DETAL5 re• r� a a E RACKET DETAILS KNL N•.YN D I I YOfSL -.�. CLP� wo, ALENM m DES 6 . .. Na < REAR ELEVATION t .�. w•. o TLEFT END SIDE ELEVATION tw•.r•o• 1.• CA m II s RIGHT END SIDE ELEVATION ecxE, w•.rd• SEEP 0Y110 �YI0IIN T ELEVATION I xag• w•.ro -1070- 1 w is 3 aa� i JLL �Z b � p� Zm �^yuL3 3 4 W ®s ce 1 I OF 2 a BUILDING SECTION T rxe. w�.r.o BUILDING SEGTI�d - 1071 - " BUI�73!` NG wGS o r � � I 'FilrAL a UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C 51®RIMM 0 GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 wts. w•.r.o• -1072- I 'Jn1�II // r � �r 7 1 ® 0 GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 2 wts. w•.r.o• -1072- COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING UPDATE TO: City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant DATE: April 21, 2015 SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council 2015 Draft Local Forecasts and Allocation of Housing Need The Metropolitan Council has released its latest draft local forecasts in preparation for System Statements being released this fall. Comments are being accepted until May 8th. These latest forecasts are what the City will be expected to plan for in its 2040 Comprehensive Plan update. As shown in the table below, the City of Mound will be expected to plan for 4,600 households, 9,400 people, and 1,900 jobs by 2040. This is less than the 4,800 households, 11,400 people, and 2,170 jobs that we planned for in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Forecasts have been dropping, in part, due to revised regional projections that show slower growth through 2040. in addition to local forecasts, the Metropolitan Council is currently accepting comments until May 15th on the proposed amendment to the 2040 Housing Policy Plan. The amendment is of particular interest to communities as it includes the Council's strategy for reviewing the housing element of local comprehensive plan updates, the 2021 -2030 Allocation of Affordable Housing Need, and the criteria the Metropolitan Council will use to develop Housing Performance Scores for each community. According to the amendment, the City's Mound's allocation of affordable housing need is 67. This number reflects Mound's regional share of affordable housing need (87) adjusted down based on the City's existing housing stock and recognizing its existing job /worker balance. This number is similar to the 2030 Comprehensivr1073-vhen the City needed to plan for 68 units. While it is likely the City should be able to meet the requirements to plan for the 67 units, it is important to note that the methods the City can use to meet the requirements have changed slightly since the last update. The City now either needs to allocated a sufficient amount of land at a density of 8 units /acre to meet the community's total need or guide enough land at a density of 12 units /acre to meet the City's need at 50% or less of AM and enough land at a density of 6 units /acre to meet the need at 51 -80 %. Given that Mound's medium density land use category is 7 to 12 units an acre, the City would either need to revise its medium density land use category definition or use the second method to achieve the affordable housing goals. Given that the 2030 Comprehensive Plan guided enough land at medium and high densities to provide for more than 150 units, City Staff anticipates that even with this change in requirement the City should be able to meet its obligation for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The City has the ability to comment on the draft local forecasts through May 8th and the amendment to the Housing Policy Plan through May 15th. Please let Staff know if comments on either document should be prepared and submitted on behalf of the City. -1074- MEMORANDUM DATE: April 22, 2015 TO: Mayor Wegscheid City Council Members FROM: Kandis HanS City Manager SUBJ: Request for Discussion by Council Member Gillispie Council Member Gillispie has requested discussion on the following topic: 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com Mound has historically had a inordinate number of rental homes and complexes. With the recent recession, statistics are likely to show more homes were purchased and converted to rentals. Rental ownership is a business and certain basic health and safety conditions should be met for occupants. Also, the status as rental could be affecting the volume of calls for service made to Mound Fire & Rescue and Orono Police Department. A rental housing code could offer a tool for staff to more effectively respond to calls from rental tenants. A review and update of existing codes may also assist. Council Member Gillispie will go into more detail. An example of a rental housing code has been provided. -1075- SECTION 5 RENTAL DWELLING UNITS 1405.000. STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION AND PURPOSE A. Statutory Authorization. This Section 5 is enacted pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.05, subd. 1 and subd. 7; and Minnesota Statutes, Section 375.51; or successor statutes. B. Purpose. The purpose of this Section 5 is to establish minimum standards for rental dwelling units in the City of Winsted. The general objectives include the following: 1. Protect the character and stability of residential areas; 2. Correct and prevent housing conditions that adversely affect, or are likely to adversely affect, the life, safety, general welfare and health of the renting public, including the physical, mental and social well -being of persons occupying a rental dwelling unit; 3. Provide minimum standards for cooking, heating and sanitary equipment necessary to the health and safety of occupants of rental dwelling units; 4. Provide minimum standards for light necessary to health and safety; 5. Prevent the overcrowding of dwellings by providing minimum space standards per occupant for each rental dwelling unit; 6. Provide minimum standards for the maintenance of existing rental residential buildings and to prevent slums and blight; 7. Preserve the value of land and buildings. 8. With respect to rental disputes, except as otherwise provided, it is not the intent of the City Council to intrude upon the fair and accepted contractual relationship between tenant and owner. The City Council does not intend to intervene as an advocate for either party, to act as an arbiter or to be receptive to complaints from tenant or owner which are not specifically and clearly relevant to the provisions of this Section 5. In the absence of such relevancy with regard to rental disputes, it is intended that the contracting parties exercise such legal sanctions as are available to them without the City Council's intervention. By enacting this Section 5, the City Council does not intend to interfere or permit interference with legal rights to personal privacy. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 1, 02/19/08) 1405.002. GENERAL PROVISIONS -1076- 1405.003. A. Jurisdiction. This Section 5shall be applicable to all rental dwelling units within the legal boundaries of the City of Winsted. Every building and its premises used in whole or in part as a rental dwelling unit, for a single family or person, and every building used in whole or in part as a rental dwelling unit having two or more persons or families living in separate units shall conform to the requirements of this Section 5, irrespective of when such building may have been constructed, altered or repaired. This Section 5establishes minimum standards for rental dwelling units and related premises. B. Severability. The provisions of this Section 5shall be severable. In the event any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Section 5is declared invalid for any reason, the remainder of this Section 5shall not be affected thereby. C. Interpretation and Application. The provisions of this Section 5shall be considered minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the City of Winsted and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by Minnesota Statutes. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 2, 02/19/08) A. Accessory Structure- A subordinate structure on the same lot as the principal dwelling or dwellings, and which is not used nor authorized to be used for living or sleeping by human occupants. B. City Council - Shall mean the City of Winsted City Council, C. Board of Adjustment- Shall mean the City of Winsted City Council. D. Building- Any structure having a roof intended for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any person, animal, goods or materials of any kind or nature. E. Building Inspector - Any duly authorized representative charged with the administration and enforcement of this Section 5. F. Dwelling - A building or portion thereof, designed or used predominantly for residential occupancy of a continued nature, including single family dwellings, two - family dwellings and multiple family dwellings, but not including hotels and motels. G. Dwelling Unit - A single unit providing complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation. H. Efficiency Living Unit - A room having cooking facilities and used for combined living, dining and sleeping purposes. V77- I. Garbage - The animal or vegetable waste resulting from the handling, preparation, cooking and consumption of food. J. Habitable Space - Space in a structure for living, sleeping, eating or cooking, bathrooms, toilet rooms, furnace rooms, unfurnished basements (i.e., those without required ventilation, electric outlets and exit facilities), pantries, closets, corridors, stairways, storage spaces, workshops, hobby and recreation areas in parts of the structure below ground level or in attics and any similar areas are not considered habitable space. K. Heated Water - Water heated to a temperature between 120 and 130 degrees Fahrenheit measured at the faucet outlet. L. Kitchen - A space which contains a sink with counter working space, adequate space for installing cooking and refrigeration equipment and adequate space for the storage of cooking utensils. M. Multiple Family Dwelling - A dwelling, or portion thereof, containing four or more dwelling units. N. Occupant - Any person living or sleeping in a building or having possession of a space within a building. O. Operator - Any person who has charge, care or control of a structure or premises which is let or offered for occupancy. P. Owner - Any person, agent, operator, firm or corporation having a legal or equitable interest in the property; or recorded in the official records of the state, county or municipality as holding title to the property; or otherwise having control of the property, including the guardian of the estate of any such person, and the executor or administrator of the estate of such person if ordered to take possession of real property by a court. Any such person representing the actual owner shall be bound to comply with the provisions of this Section 5to the same extent as the owner. Q. Permissible Occupancy - The maximum number of persons permitted to reside in a dwelling unit or rooming unit. R. Person - An individual, firm, partnership, association or corporation; the term may extend and be applied to bodies corporate and politic and to partnerships and other unincorporated associations. S. Premises - A lot or parcel of land, including any structures thereon. T. Public Hall - A hall, corridor or passageway for providing egress from a dwelling unit to a public way and not within the exclusive control of one family. U. Rental Dwelling or Dwelling Unit - A dwelling or dwelling unit let for rent or -IM- 1405.004. lease. V. Rodent Harborage - Any place where rodents can live, nest or seek shelter. W. Rooming Unit - Any room or group of rooms forming a single habitable unit occupied or intended to be occupied for sleeping or living, but not for cooking purposes. X. Rubbish - Combustible and noncombustible waste materials, except garbage; the term shall include the residue from the burning of wood, coal, and other combustible; materials, paper, rags, cartons, boxes, wood, excelsior, rubber, leather, tree branches, yard trimmings, tin cans, metals, mineral matter, glass, crockery and other similar materials. Y. Structure - That which is built or constructed or a portion thereof. Z. Tenant - A person, whether or not the legal owner of record, occupying a building, or portion thereof, as a unit. AA. Toilet Room - A room containing a water closet or urinal but not a bathtub or shower. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 3, 02/19/08) A. Permit Required. No owner or other person shall occupy or rent to another person any dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit unless it and the premises are clean, sanitary, fit for human occupancy and comply with all applicable legal requirements of the State, County and City, including the following requirements. No owner or other person shall occupy or rent to another person any dwelling or dwelling unit unless they have first obtained a permit from the City of Winsted. A separate permit is required for each dwelling unit to be used as a rental housing unit. Permits are valid for five (5) years from their date of issuance. Permits may be revoked for failure to adhere to this Section 5 requirements for rental housing. Permits shall be good for a period of five (5) years. Permit fees shall be established annually by resolution of the City Council. Transfer of Ownership: In the event of a transfer of ownership of rental property, the transferor of the property shall notify the city within 30 days of the change of ownership. The transferee will need to provide the city with information including name, address, and telephone number. If the rental license for the property is current and valid, the permit may be transferred for the existing term once the required information has been provided and the transfer fee (set in the city's fee schedule) has been paid. B. Shared or Public Areas. Every owner of a dwelling containing two or more -1P ? -9- dwelling units shall maintain in a clean and sanitary condition the shared or public areas of the dwelling and premises. C. Occupied Areas. Every occupant of a dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit shall maintain in a clean and sanitary condition that part or those parts of the unit and premises that the occupant occupies and controls. D. Garbage and Rubbish Storage and Disposal. Every occupant of a rental dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit shall store and dispose of all garbage and rubbish in a clean, sanitary and safe manner as provided by law. Every owner of a rental dwelling, dwelling unit or rooming unit shall supply facilities for the sanitary and safe storage and/or disposal of garbage and rubbish. That cost may be part of the occupant's expense as provided by agreement of the parties. E. Storm and Screen Doors and Windows. The owner of a rental dwelling unit shall be responsible for maintaining in good repair all screens, storm doors and storm windows when required under the provisions of this Section 5, except where there is written agreement otherwise between the owner and occupant and except for the intentional or neglectful action of the occupant. F. Pest Extermination. Every occupant of a rental dwelling unit shall be responsible for the extermination of vermin infestations and/or rodents on the premises. Every occupant of a dwelling unit in a rental dwelling containing more than one dwelling unit shall be responsible for such extermination whenever occupant's dwelling unit is the only one infested. Whenever infestation is caused by the failure of the owner to maintain a rental dwelling in a reasonable rodent -proof or reasonable vermin -proof condition, extermination shall be the responsibility of the owner. Whenever infestation exists in two or more of the dwelling units in any rental dwelling, or in the shared or public parts of any dwelling containing two or more dwelling units, extermination shall be the responsibility of the owner. G. Rodent Harborages and Food. No owner or occupant of a rental dwelling unit shall accumulate or be allowed to accumulate boxes, lumber, wood, scrap metal or any other similar materials in such a manner that may provide a rodent harborage in or about any rental dwelling unit. Stored materials shall be stacked neatly in piles at least ten (10) feet away from any dwelling unit and one (1) foot above the ground. No owner or occupant of a rental dwelling unit shall store, place or be allowed to accumulate any materials that may serve as food for rodents in a site accessible to rodents. H. Fixtures and Facilities. Every occupant of a rental dwelling unit shall keep all supplied fixtures and facilities in a safe, clean and sanitary condition and shall be responsible for the exercise of reasonable care in the proper use and operation thereof. I. Snow and Ice Removal. The owner of a multiple family dwelling shall be responsible for the removal of snow and ice from the parking lots, driveways, steps and walkways on the premises within a reasonable amount of time to -IQ$Q- provide access for fire and medical personnel. J. Minimum Exterior Lighting. The owner of a multiple family rental dwelling shall be responsible for providing and maintaining effective illumination in all exterior parking lots and walkways. K. Driving and Parking Areas. The owner of a multiple family rental dwelling unit shall be responsible for providing and maintaining in good condition parking areas and driveways for tenants. L. Yards. The owner of a multiple family rental dwelling shall be responsible for providing and maintaining premises in a safe and sanitary manner. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 4, 02/19/08; Ord. 14 -04, 8/19/14) 1405.005. MINIMUM STANDARDS. No person shall rent to another for occupancy any dwelling unit, for the purpose of living, sleeping, cooking or eating which does not comply with the following requirements. A. Kitchen Facilities. Every rental dwelling unit shall have a room or portion of a room in which food may be prepared and/or cooked, which shall have adequate circulation and which shall be equipped with the following: 1. A kitchen sink in working condition and properly connected to an approved water supply system and which provides at all times an adequate amount of heated and unheated running water under pressure, and which is connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. 2. Cabinets and/or shelves for the storage of eating, drinking and cooking equipment and utensils and for food that does not require refrigeration; and a counter or table for food preparation. Cabinets and /or shelves and counter or table shall be adequate for the permissible occupancy of the rental dwelling unit and shall be of sound construction furnished with surfaces that are easily cleanable and that will not impart any toxic or deleterious effect to food. 3. A stove or similar device for cooking food and a refrigerator or similar device for the safe storage of food, which are properly installed with all necessary connections for safe, sanitary and efficient operation. Provided that such stove, refrigerator or similar device need not be installed when a rental dwelling unit is not occupied and when the occupant is expected to provide same on occupancy, in which case sufficient space and adequate connections for the installation and operation of said stove, refrigerator or similar device must be provided. B. Toilet Facilities. There shall be a non - habitable room that is equipped with a flush water closet in working condition. In a rental dwelling unit, such room shall have an entrance door that affords privacy. A flush water closet shall be equipped with easily cleanable surfaces, shall be connected to an approved water system that at all times provides an adequate amount of running water under pressure to -1Q$�' cause the water closet to be operated properly and shall be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. C. Lavatory Sink. Within every rental dwelling unit, there shall be a lavatory sink. Said lavatory sink may be in the same room as the flush water closet. If located in another room, the lavatory sink shall be located in close proximity to the door leading directly into the room in which said water closet is located. The lavatory sink shall be in working condition, shall be properly connected to an approved water supply system, shall provide at all times an adequate amount of heated and unheated running water under pressure and shall be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. D. Bathtub or Shower. Within every rental dwelling unit, there shall be a nonhabitable room that is equipped with a bathtub or shower in working condition. In a rental dwelling unit, such room shall have an entrance door that affords privacy. Said bathtub or shower may be in the same room as the flush water closet or in another room, shall be properly connected to an approved water supply system, shall provide proper ventilation (i.e. fan or operable window), shall provide at all times an adequate amount of heated and unheated water under pressure, and shall be connected to an approved sanitary sewer system. E. Stairways, Porches and Balconies. Every stairway, porch or balcony shall be kept in safe condition and of sound repair, free of deterioration. No flight of stairs shall have rotting, loose or deteriorating supports. Stairways shall be capable of supporting a live load of 100 pounds per square foot of horizontal projection. Decks shall be able to support 40 pounds per square foot live load and 10 pounds per square foot dead load. F. Access to Rental Dwelling Units. Access to or egress from each rental dwelling unit shall be provided without passing through any other dwelling unit. G. Door Locks. No owner shall occupy nor let to another for occupancy any dwelling unit unless all exterior doors of the rental dwelling unit are equipped with safe, functioning locking devices. Multiple family dwellings shall also be furnished with door locks as follows: Every door that is designed to provide ingress or egress for a dwelling unit within a multiple family rental dwelling shall be equipped with an approved locking device, provided, however, that such door shall be operable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. H. Light. No person shall rent to another for occupancy any dwelling unit for the purposes of living therein which does not comply with the following requirements: I. Electrical Equipment. All electrical equipment, wiring and appliances shall be installed and maintained in a safe manner in accordance with all applicable laws, including the Minnesota State Electrical Code. All electrical equipment shall be of an approved type. Every habitable room shall contain at least two (2) supplied .19u- electric convenience outlets or one such convenience outlet and one supplied electric fixture. Every toilet room, bathroom, furnace room, laundry room and public hallway shall contain at least one supplied electric light fixture. J. Windows. Every habitable space shall have at least one window facing directly outdoors that can be opened easily, one of which must provide egress. K. Emergency Escape Openings. Required emergency escape openings shall be maintained in accordance with the code in effect at the time of construction. Required emergency escape and rescue openings shall be operational from the inside of the room without the use of keys or tools. Bars, grills, grates or similar devices are permitted to be placed over emergency escape and rescue openings provided the minimum net clear opening size complies with the code that was in effect at the time of construction and such devices shall be releasable or removable from the inside without the use of a key, tool or force greater than that which is required for normal operation of the escape and rescue opening. L. Heating. No person shall rent to another for occupancy any dwelling or dwelling unit, for the purposes of living therein, which does not have heating facilities which are properly installed, which are not maintained in safe working condition and which are not capable of safely and adequately heating all habitable rooms, bathrooms and toilet rooms in every dwelling unit located therein. Gas or electric appliances designed primarily for cooking or water heating purposes shall not be considered as heating facilities within the meaning of this Section. Portable heating equipment employing flame and the use of liquid fuel do not meet the requirements of this Section and are prohibited. No owner or occupant shall install, operate or use a space heater employing a flame that is not vented outside the structure in an approved manner. M. Maximum Occupancy. Every dwelling unit shall contain at least 200 square feet of floor space for the first occupant and at least 100 additional square feet of floor space for every additional occupant. The floor space shall be calculated on the basis of total habitable room area, inside measurements. No floor space shall be included in the determination of habitable room area over which the ceiling is less than seven (7) feet above the floor. N. Water Supply. Each rental dwelling unit shall be supplied with drinking water which meets all local, state and federal drinking water standards. O. Handrails and Guardrails. Every exterior and interior flight of stairs having more than four risers shall have a handrail on one side of the stair and every open portion of a stair, landing, balcony, porch, deck, ramp or other walking surface which is more than 30 inches above the floor or grade below shall have guards. Handrails shall not be less than 30 inches high or more than 42 inches high measured vertically above the nosing of the tread or above the finished floor of the landing or walking surfaces. Guards shall not be less than 30 inches high above the floor of the landing, balcony, porch, deck, or ramp or other walking -IQ8Q- surface. Exception: Guards shall not be required where exempted by the adopted building code. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 5, 02/19/08; Ord, 12 -09; Sec. 5, 11/20/12) 1405.006. REQUIREMENTS. No person shall rent to another for occupancy a dwelling unit, for the purpose of living therein, which does not comply with the following requirements: A. Foundations, Exterior Walls and Roofs. The foundation, exterior walls and exterior roof shall be substantially water tight, protected against mold, vermin and rodents and shall be kept in sound condition and repair. The foundation element shall adequately support the building at all points. Every exterior wall shall be free of visible mold, deterioration, holes, breaks, loose or rotting timbers and any other condition which might admit rain or dampness to the interior portion of the walls or to the interior spaces of the dwelling. The roof shall be tight and have no defects that admit rain. Roof drainage shall be adequate to prevent rainwater from dampness in the walls. All exterior wood surfaces, other than decay resistant woods, shall be protected from the elements and decay by paint or other protective covering or treatment. B. Windows, Doors and Screens. Every window, exterior door and hatchway shall be substantially tight and shall be kept in sound condition and repair. Every window, other than a fixed window or storm window, shall be capable of being easily opened. Every window, door and frame shall be constructed and maintained in such relation to the adjacent wall construction as to completely exclude rain, wind, vermin and rodents from entering the building. C. Floors, Interior Walls and Ceilings. Every floor, interior wall and ceiling shall be adequately protected against the passage and harborage of vermin and rodents, free of visible mold growth, and shall be kept in sound condition and good repair. Every floor shall be free of loose, warped, protruding or rotted flooring materials. Every interior wall and ceiling shall be free of holes, large cracks, loose plaster, visible mold growth or flaking lead paint and shall be maintained in a tight weatherproof condition. Toxic paint and materials with a lasting toxic effect shall not be used. Every toilet room and bathroom floor surface shall be capable of being easily maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. D. Rodent Proof. Every dwelling and accessory structure and the premises upon which they are located shall be maintained in a rodent -free and rodent -proof condition. All openings in exterior walls, foundations, basements, ground or first floors and roofs that have a %z inch diameter or larger opening shall be rodent - proofed in an approved manner. E. Safe Building Elements. Every foundation, roof, floor, exterior and interior wall, ceiling, inside and outside stair, every porch and balcony, and every appurtenance shall be safe to use and capable of supporting normal loads. -iQQ4- F. Facilities to Function. Every supplied facility, piece of equipment or utility required by this Section 5 and every chimney and flue shall be installed and maintained and shall function effectively in a safe, sound and working condition. G. Discontinuance of Service of Facilities. No owner or occupant shall cause any service, facility, equipment or utility which is required under this Section 5 to be removed from, shut off from, or discontinued for, any occupied rental dwelling unit, except for such temporary interruptions as may be necessary while actual repairs or alterations are in process, or during temporary emergencies. H. Fire and Carbon Monoxide Protection. All rental dwelling units shall have working fire /smoke alarms in all bedrooms and corridors leading to bedrooms. All rental dwelling units shall have a working fire extinguisher inside the unit. Additionally, all rental dwelling units shall be supplied with a functioning carbon monoxide detector, unless granted a waiver from the State of Minnesota. I. Clandestine Drug Labs. Prior to offering a rental dwelling unit for rent or for sale, the owner of a rental dwelling unit that has been found to contain a clandestine drug lab shall, at their expense, contract with appropriate environmental hazard testing and cleaning firms that are determined by the Minnesota Department of Health to be competent for conducting a detailed on- site assessment to determine sample and testing needs, clean up and mitigation operations, follow up testing and determination that the property risks are sufficiently reduced to allow protection of the public and human occupancy of the rental dwelling unit. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 6, 02/19/08) 1405.007. INSPECTION AUTHORITY. The City Building Inspector shall be the Building Inspector who shall administer and enforce the provisions of this Section 5. The Building Inspector is authorized to cause inspections every five (5) -years or on a complaint basis for rental dwelling units, or otherwise when reason exists to believe that a violation of this Section 5 has been or is being committed. Re- inspection is also required upon a change of ownership in the property. Inspections shall be conducted during daylight hours and the Building Inspector shall present evidence of official capacity to the occupant or owner in charge of a respective dwelling unit. A. Inspection Access. When an owner, occupant or other person in charge of a rental dwelling unit refuses to permit free access and entry to the structure or premises under their control for inspection pursuant to this Section 5, the City of Winsted may seek a court order authorizing inspection. B. Vacation of Building. Any rental dwelling unit which is damaged, decayed, dilapidated, unsanitary, unsafe, vermin or rodent- infested, or which lacks provision for basic illumination, ventilation or sanitary facilities to the extent that the defects create a hazard to the health, safety or welfare of the occupants or the public, may be declared unfit for human habitation by the Building Inspector who -1085- shall then order the same vacated within a reasonable timeframe and shall post a placard on the rental dwelling unit indicating that it is unfit for human habitation. C. Reoccupation. It shall be unlawful for a rental dwelling unit to be used for human habitation until the defective conditions have been corrected and written approval has been issued by the Building Inspector. It shall be unlawful for any person to deface or remove the declaration placard from any such rental dwelling unit. D. Secure Units and Vacated Dwellings. The owner of any rental dwelling unit which has been declared unfit for human habitation, or which is otherwise vacant for a period of 60 days or more, shall make the premises safe and secure so that it is not hazardous to the health, safety or welfare of the public and a public nuisance within the meaning of this Section 5. E. Hazardous Building Declaration. In the event that a rental dwelling unit has been declared unfit for human habitation and the owner has not remedied the defects within the prescribed time, the dwelling may be declared a public health nuisance and treated consistent with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.04; or successor statutes. F. Malicious Complaints. The Building Inspector may charge back to the complainant the costs of investigating complaints made on any rental dwelling unit if it is determined that the complaint is invalid. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 7, 02/19/08) 1405.008. COMPLIANCE ORDER A. Issuance. Whenever the Building Inspector determines that any rental dwelling unit, or the premises surrounding any rental dwelling, fails to meet the provisions of this Section 5, a Compliance Order may be issued setting forth the violations and ordering the owner, occupant, operator or agent to correct such violation. This Compliance Order shall: be in writing, describe the location and nature of the violations of this Section 5 and establish a reasonable timeframe for the correction of such violation and notify of appeal recourse. Be served upon the owner and occupant. Such notice shall be deemed to be properly served upon such owner and occupant, if a copy of the Order is: (1) served personally; or (2) sent by registered mail to last known address; or (3) upon failure to place notice through (1) and (2) as set out in this Section, posted at a conspicuous place in or about the dwelling that is affected by the order. B. Right of Appeal. When it is alleged by any person to whom a Compliance Order is directed that such Compliance Order is based upon an erroneous interpretation of this Section 5, such person may appeal the Compliance Order to the City Council within thirty (30) days of the receipt of a Compliance Order. -100- C. Reinspection. The Building Inspector shall re- inspect the property to determine if the owner has complied with the Compliance Order. If compliance has not been completed upon reinspection, the owner or occupant shall be assessed a reinspection fee, in an amount determined by the City Council for that reinspection and each subsequent reinspection for compliance. Failure to pay the reinspection fee shall constitute a failure to comply with this Section 5. D. Execution of Compliance Orders. Upon the failure to comply with a Compliance Order within the time set and no appeal having been taken, or upon failure to comply with a modified Compliance Order within the time set, any criminal penalty notwithstanding, the City Council may cause the cited deficiency to be remedied as set forth in the Compliance Order. If the cost of cleanup is not paid, the City Council may certify to the County Auditor - Treasurer by November 30`h all unpaid, outstanding costs of cleanup, including staff costs of operating machinery and materials needed to complete a cleanup and a description of the lands against which the costs arose. It shall be the duty of the County Auditor - Treasurer, upon order of the City Council, to extent the assessments with interest not to exceed the interest rate provided for in Minnesota Statutes, section 279.03, Subd. 1; or successor statutes, upon the tax roles of the county for the taxes of the year in which the assessment is filed. For each year ending November 30, the assessment with interest shall be carried into the tax becoming due and payable in January of the following year, and shall be enforced and collected of real and/or personal property taxes in accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of Minnesota. The assessment, if not paid, shall become delinquent and be subject to the same penalties and the same rate of interest as the taxes under the general laws of the State of Minnesota. This action shall not preclude the City Council from seeking civil or criminal penalties from persons responsible. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 8, 02/19/08) 1405.009. EMERGENCY ORDERS. Whenever the Building Inspector finds that an emergency exists which requires immediate action to protect the public's health, it may, without notice or hearings, issue an order reciting the existence of an emergency and require that such action be taken as deemed necessary to meet the emergency. Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Section 5, such order shall be effective immediately. Any person to whom an emergency order is directed shall comply therewith immediately. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 9, 02/19/08) 1405.010. PENALTIES. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any of the provisions of this Section 5, or who fails, neglects or refuses to comply with the provisions of this Section 5, including violations of conditions, safeguards Compliance Orders or Emergency Orders, or who knowingly makes any material false statement or knowing omission in any document required to be submitted under the provisions hereof, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 or by imprisonment not to exceed 90 days, or both. Each day that a violation exists shall constitute a -1087- separate offense. In the event of a violation or threatened violation of this Section 5, the Building Inspector may, in addition to other remedies, initiate appropriate civil action or proceedings to prevent, prosecute, restrain, correct or abate such violations or threatened violations. It shall be the duty of the City of Winsted Attorney to commence such action. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 10, 02/19/08) 1405.011. EXEMPTION. The City, in its discretion, may exempt any entity or person required to otherwise undergo inspection or licensing provisions herein as long as the City is provided with evidence of a recent similar inspection that is satisfactory to the City. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 11, 02/19/08) 1405.012. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Section 14 shall be in full force and effect after its passage and publication as provided by law. Application for a rental housing permit must be received by the City of Winsted within 120 days of adoption of this Section 14. (Ord. 08 -03, Sec. 12, 02/19/08) I:: 10WITM 1•i I t Fire Commission Meeting Wednesday April 22, 2015 11:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m. 1. General Information and Updates • 2014 MFD Annual Report • 2014 Year Highlights, Accomplishments, Hot Topics Review 2. Hot Topics and Fire Chiefs 2015 Priority Projects • Fire Department NEWS, MWHS Mock Crash • MFD Duty Officer Program — 12 month evaluation and report • West Hennepin (Lakes Area) Fire Group "Concept' and Meeting 3. Financial and Budgets • MVFD Relief Association Pension Plan Valuation as of 12/31/14 • 2014 Budget vs. Expenditures, Fire and Apparatus Fund Balance • 2015 -2024 Capital Improvement Plan, Apparatus and Equipment Purchases 4. Other NEWS and Information • Engine #18 to Hovland Fire Department • MVFD Relief Assn. Fish Fry and Dance 2015 June 6, 2015 5. Adjourn 1:• Mound Eire Department 2008 We must evaluate and implement a short term and long term plan that reconfigures our apparatus and equipment fleet, and then implement response sequence changes that are more appropriate, efficient and effective. P,te Fi e" "Small Fire" Pt Accident SI}edat Iiazard Sciwice Cabs No Major change Smaller Apparatus Smaller Apparatus? Change response Not sure, needs TBD Change Response 009 or be on' 009 or be on ate in 2008 009 or be and Comments, Concepts, Action Items and Implementations Steps: 1. Dispose of some of our OLDER JUAW apparatus that we do not need! (i.e. F- Troop, Gamma Goat, R19) 2. Evaluate our utilization of each apparatus and apparatus type to determine usefulness and justify future purchase. 3. Better utilize our Existingpttaratus by establishing and redefining each apparatus purpose (Grass #11, Utility #22) 4. Brainstorm about better and more sensible apparatus purchase while considering our ISO PPC rating ... $$$$ 5. Possibly reduce the numbers of apparatus, replace apparatus we need, have better newer equipment, or at a minimum less expensive apparatus when DIG RUCKRIGII TICKET $$ trucks are not needed. 6. End Result: Newer — Better — More Efficient — More Appropriately Equipped — Less to Maintain, Check or Test, and Repair —Reads t`orf4r�vtkin��tter�aratus Random thoughts: I . Our emergency response calls are more unusual and bizarre than ever before — we get called out for anything and everything which requires a NEW SET of Rules and Tools! 2. Actual Fire calls are less than in the past, special calls for services are more than ever. 3. We need a smaller well equipped (loaded with stuff) combined use vehicle for Special Response Calls, EMS, Service Calls, Duty Officer, Light Response Vehicle. 4. Our small Grass Rig Mini - Pumper works well and needs more use! 5. Our Utility Truck #22 needs to be reengaged and out back into the mix, but needs a revamp of inventory, tools and equipment to make it more useful. 6. Ye need to determine if sue are trre�ared for all tutees of calls and what we might want to add to our toll box of tools and training. What types of calls should we train for? What kind tools and equipment do we need that we don't have? -1090- 1901 -176 AU'T'OMOTIVE FIREAPPARATUS Annex C Weights and Dimensions for Common Equipment This annex is sot apart oftheuequiremants of this NITA document but is Included for infonnational purposes only. C.1 The Fire Apparatus Manufacturers Association (FAMA) provides a worksheet for use by purchasers to calculate the portable equipment load anticipated to be carried on an ap- paratus. To ensure that the apparatus chassis is capable of car- rying the installed equipment (pump, tank, aerial device, etc.) plus the specified portable equipment load with an appropri- ate margin of safety, the purchaser should use this worksheet to provide apparatus vendors with the weight of the equip- ment they anticipate carrying when the apparatus is placed in service. C.1.1 The approximate measurements and weights of equip- ment that am commonly available and used during fire depart ment operations are listed on the worksheet The purchaser should fill in the number of units of each piece of anticipated equipment in tine column titled "Quantity" and multiply that by the weight per unit to get the total weight. The dimensions of each piece of equipment are given to assist in planning compart- ment size m the location on the fire apparatus. Where the pur- chaser wants to carry specific equipment in a specific compart- ment, that compartment designation should be shown in the column titled "Compartment Location." C.1.2 The worksheet can be downloaded as an Excel spread - shect from the FAMA website, unvmfanucor-g, and customized to show only the equipment a department expects to carry. There are additional columns on the spreadsheet to assist the fire department in maintaining records of the equipment it carries on the apparatus. Annex D Guidelines for First -line and Reserve Fire Apparatus This annex is not a pats of the requirements of this NFPA document but is included for infmmational purposes only. D.1 General. To maximize fire fighter capabilities and mini- mize risk of injuries, it is important that fire apparatus be equipped with the latest safety features and operating capabili- ties. In die last I0 to 15 years, much progress has been made in upgrading functional capabilities and improving the safety features of fire apparatus. Apparatus manufactured prior to 1991 usually included only a few of the safety upgrades re- quired by the recent editions of the NFPA fire department apparatus standards or the equivalent Underwriters' Laborato- ries of' Canada (ULC) standards. Because tine changes, up- grades, and fine timing to NFPA 1901, Standard f"Autotnotive Fire Appanumv, have been tndy significant, especially in the area of safety, fire departments should seriously consider the value (or risk) to fire fighters of keeping fire apparatus older than 15 years in first -line service. It is recommended that apparatus greater than 15 years old that have been properly maintained and that are still in serviceable condition be placed in reserve status and up- graded in accordance with NFPA 1912, Standard forFireAp- paratus Refitrbishing, to incorporate as many features as pos- sible of the current fire apparatus standard (see Section D.3). This will ensure that, while the apparatus might not totally comply with the current edition of the automotive fire ap- paratus standards, many of the improvements and upgrades required by the recent versions of the standards are avail- able to the fire fighters who use the apparatus. Apparatus that were not manufactured to the applicable NFPA fire apparatus standards or that are over 25 years old should be replaced. D.2 How the Standards Have Changed. It is a generally ac- cepted fact that fire apparatus, like all types of mechanical de- vices, have a finite rife. The length of that life depends on many factors, including vehicle mileage and engine hours, quality of the preventative maintenance program, quality of tine driver (mining program, whether the fire apparatus was used within die design parameters, whether the apparatus was manufacaued on a custom or commercial chassis, quality of workmanship by the original manufacturer, quality of the components used, and availability of replacement parts, to name a lew. In the fire service, there are fire apparatus with 8 to 10 years of service that are simply worn out. There are also fire app-am- ms that were manufactured with quality components, that have had excellent maintenance, and that have responded to a minimum number of incidents that are still in serviceable condition after 20 years. Most would agree that the care of fire apparatus while being used and the quality and timeliness of maintenance are perhaps the most significant factors ill deter- mining how well a fire apparatus ages. Prior to 1991, NF1'A 1901 was basically a 'reactive stan- dard." If something worked well it, field use for a few years, it might have been suggested for inclusion in NFI'A 1901. It was a very basic standard. In the late 1980s, the Technical Commit- tee on Fire Department Apparatus decided to become proac- tive and to greatly enhance the value of the standard for the fire service. Task groups were appointed to develop reason- able requirements for the various components that made up a fire apparatus, and a safety task group was charged with look- ing at issues across the board that would huprove the saint of fire fighters who use tine apparatus. The completely revised 1991 editions of the NFPA fire do- parunent apparatus standards were the result of those efforts and the full conmittee'sstrong desire to make the automotive fire apparatus standards not only more safety oriented but also more user friendly. Contained within the 1991 edition of the fire department apparatus standards were requirements for such items as fully enclosed riding areas with reduced noise (dBA) levels to keep crew members safe and informed, seats and seat belts for all crew members riding on the apparatus, fail -safe door handles so the sleeve of a coat dill not inadvertently catch a handle and open a door, and signs requiring everyone to be seated and belted. Also included were increased battery capacity to en- sure starting under most conditions; unproved warning lights, including intersection lights for increased visibility; removal of all roof-mounted audible warning devices to reduce hearing problems; a flashing light in the cab to warn if a cab or body door is open; a backup alarm; an automatic transmission to make it easier to drive (unless the purchaser has a specific reason for a manual transmission); auxiliary braking systems; and reflective striping. The tip load for an aerial ladder was required to have a minimum carrying capacity of 250 113 (114 kg) when the aerial ladder was at zero degrees elevation and maximmnn extension. Other requirements, such as a minimum tail height, the nrini- nurm design strength of tine rungs, and a minimum load- carrying requirement to ' folding steps, were added to make the aerial ladder safer for fire fighters to use. Where a water 2009 Edition -1091- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ) () ) ) ) \ ; - $ ! z { § ■ f , , ! ■ �■ _ � � , \ 2 \ K K ) / & ) } � k ƒ ) k k f f Vil \) ( = q ( \ ƒ e ( ( \ } s ! ( i 2 ƒ ! \ ; k ƒ k � , ; ! , ; ■ �■ _ � � , \ 2 \ K K ) / & ) } � k ƒ ) k k f f Vil \) ( = q ( \ ƒ e ( ( \ } s ! ( i 2 ƒ ! \ ; k ƒ k � , N C pO M a d V m u d A E m 2 9 m A °5a 0 a r1 O Z Ww K C g Q h Q V u a m `o F n 0 a b b m LL O Q iv E N U LL O_ N O N a U N d L6y Q d LL B44 � c�� 9 L O a) 75 J rn o a)o EE o� 2 mJ J � co MEX O J J o o C O L J 0O 0 ® O > O —� J J J Co � w F- .-. CO U L C �� (� O> V ® O O �® v- m C C C U J O J U L O j N U) 13 _m �+ C C6 ° _ i V n : _ C c a. J U U -1094- April 17, 2015 Re: All Digital Transition Dear Community Official: Theresa Sunde Government Relations Manager Mediacom is happy to announce to you that on April , 2015, we will begin the process of transforming the remaining analog channels on your line -up to a digital format. This transition will move channels 2 -22 and 77 to a permanent digital home. Once the change is complete, customers will see improvements in internet capabilities and a better video picture and sound quality for an all- around better viewing experience. Customers who have a Mediacom digital convertor will not be affected by the change. Customers with a digital ready TV but, no digital convertor should channel re -scan their TV's to ensure receiving all of the channels in the digital format. Some customers may still have a non - digital TV in use in their household. Those customers will need a Mediacom digital convertor in order to view the new all- digital channels. Customers needing a digital convertor may go to a Mediacom listed on the enclosed flyer or by contacting Customer Service at 1- 800 - 479-2095. Enclosed with this letter is an information piece with further details on the transition. Mediacom is proud to serve your community, and looks forward to bringing our customers the best services we can provide. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at (507) 835-2356 or by email at tsunde@_mediac4mcs_,cQm . Sincerely, r% c»,d.•rer Theresa Sunde Mediacom COmmC -'- 'ons Corporation 1504 2nd Street SE,-LO915 ca, Minnesota 56093 f3U .t rth� future of TV <Customer Name> <Address 1> <Address 2> <City, State Zip> <ACCOUNT #> Dear <First Name> <Last Name>, At Mediacom, we're constantly striving to do more for our customers. That's why we're in the process of converting our TV channel lineup from analog to All Digital. You must take action to ensure all of your TVs are equipped to receive the digital signal when the analog signal for channels 2.23 and 77 goes away. Any non - digital -ready TV or any TV not connected to a Mediacom Digital Box will need a Digital Adapter to receive the new digital lineup. Once installed, all of your channels will be available and will automatically update with any future lineup additions or changes. The move to All Digital has begun and will be completed in June. Please contact us as soon as possible for the Digital Adapters you will need so that you can continue to receive your favorite channels on all of your TVs. Mediacom will provide all Local Plus -only subscribers with up to three Digital Adapters at no cost through June 30, 2016. Beginning July 1, 2016, a monthly fee of $0.99 per standard adapter or $1.99 per HD adapter will be added to your bill. Adapters must be ordered by August 31, 2015, to qualify. To receive your Digital Adapters, please call 800.4792095, go to mediacomcable.com /order or visit your local Mediacom office. Please reference your customer account number (listed above) when you order. This will help us provide relevant information based on your service plan and process your request faster. We value you as a customer and look forward to providing you this exciting new update. Sincerely, siffiWepirl Bill Jensen Regional Vice President All offices are closed every Wednesday from 9AM -10AM & with the exception of Waseca from 11 AM -Noon daily. CHANHASSEN OFFICE 1670 Lake Dr. W I M -F 8 AM - 5 PM HUTCHINSON OFFICE 902 Hwy 15SIM -F8AM -5PM MOUND OFFICE 2381 Wilshire Blvd. I M -F 8 AM - 5 PM REDWOOD FALLS OFFICE 510 West Park Rd. I M -F 8 AM - 5 PM <BARCODE> ST. PETER OFFICE 1601 Old Minnesota Ave. I M -F 8 AM - 5 PM WASECA OFFICE 15042nd Ave SEIM -F8AM -5PM Re: Change in Hennepin County Ordinance 24, Smoke Free Epidemiology: (612) 543 -5230 Environmental Health: (612) 543 -5200 FAX: (952) 351 -5222 March 13, 2015 On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners expanded the scope of Ordinance 24, the Smoke -Free Ordinance, from prohibiting smoking in food establishments to prohibiting smoking in all public places consistent with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (MN 144.411- 144.417). In addition, electronic delivery devices are included in the definition of "smoking." Thus, the use of electronic delivery devices is prohibited in places where conventional smoking is already prohibited, as well as in places where state law already prohibits use of electronic delivery' devices. The revised Ordinance 24 may be found at hqp://www.hennepin.us/your-govemment/ordinances/ordinance-24. Please share the following with your area businesses. Proprietors or other persons in charge shall make reasonable efforts to prevent smoking in public areas by posting "no smoking" signs and asking any person who smokes or uses an electronic delivery device in an area where it is prohibited to refrain from smoking, and if the person does not do so, asking the person to leave. This ordinance shall be enforced by the Health Authority and local law enforcement. Any person who violates this ordinance or permits a violation to exist on the premises under his/her control shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Failure to comply shall be adequate grounds for denial, refusal to renew, revocation or suspension of license or permit issued by the County or issued a citation to the person who has committed the violation. The new ordinance takes effect March 10, 2015. We have provided licensed food facilities with window decals that reinforce the no smoking message. If the City or your area businesses or property owners would like to order these decals, they can e -mail Association for Nonsmokers Minnesota (ANSR) at signorderspansrinn.M. Further information about the change in Ordinance 24 can be found at www.henneVin.us/smokefree. Sincerely, Susan Palchick, PhD, MPH Director, Hennepin County Public Health -1097- Aprill4th 2015 Lois Langer Thompson Library Director 12601 Ridgedale Drive Minnetonka, MN 55305 Dear Lois, I am in receipt of your letter dated April 2 1d 2015 in regard to the renaming of the Library in Mound. The city of Mound intended to only show support to the name change should the County chose to make a change, As the city of Mound recognizes this as a Hennepin County topic, we have no plans to gather public comment as to the topic. Mounds official position on the renaming of the library is that we will support whatever direction the Hennepin County Library system takes. in the April 14'h Council meeting I spoke to this effect making it understood that this is not the city's place to pursue the name change and we support any decision the County makes. Have a great spring! Sincerely, Mayor V "' N� Mayor Mark Wegscheid 1•: Director's Office 12601 Ridgedale Drive, Minnetonka, MN 55305 PHONE 612.543.8504 FAX 612,543 8600 April 2, 2015 Mayor Mark Wegscheid City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Wegscheid, I have received a copy of your resolution requesting the name of the library be changed from Hennepin County Library — Westonka to Hennepin County Library — Mound. We appreciate local interest and input around Hennepin County services. We ask that these processes are inclusive of residents and any interested community stakeholders. We have heard concerns that the name change proposal did not allow the community to voice their opinion. Before we forward the resolution, we request you engage your community in a discussion of the possible name change. Sincerely, Lois Langer Thompson Library Director Cc: Judy Regenscheid, Assistant County Administrator Operations -1099- INDIAN KNOL M H,)mes tnr Genesatiens Aeon submits this statement of Qualifications and Interest in purchasing Indian Knoll Manor, a 4- story, 50 -unit apartment complex located at 2020 Commerce Boulevard, in Mound, Minnesota. Indian KralI Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 N. 3r° Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 April 20, 2015 City of Mound Attn: Catherine Pausche 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 RE: Statement of Qualifications and Interest in the purchase of Indian Knoll Manor Apartments - Mound, MN Dear Ms. Pausche, nJaeon, Aeon is pleased to submit our Statement of Qualification for the purchase of Indian Knoll Manor. We are excited about the opportunity to build a powerful new relationship with the City and to bring quality housing services to the residents of Mound. Widely recognized for our creativity, dedication, and technical skills, Aeon has raised over $300 million of capital dollars in the last 29 years. Today, we serve more than 4,000 people in 36 properties throughout the Twin Cities providing a wide range of housing opportunities. There are multiple sources of funding in every project we undertake, a testament to both the abilities of our staff to manage complex projects and of the confidence our funders have in Aeon. In addition to our staff's proven capacity to manage complex housing projects, our positive working relationship with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) will help facilitate the transition of Indian Knoll Manor from its current PHA status to private ownership. Aeon is continually looked to as a critical community resource, especially for complex development projects. Our projects are designed to implement the goals of each community in which we work. We look forward to working with the City of Mound and its residents to ensure that Indian Knoll Manor continues to provide a high - quality, safe, and affordable place to call home. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Please don't hesitate to contact either one of us if you have any questions about our submission. Regards, f /-\ N v 0joi=X Alan Arthur President and CEO 612- 746 -0540 Encl. Gina Ciganik I I Vice President of Housing Development 612- 746 -0545 Page 1 Contents NARRATIVE........................................................................................................................... ............................... 3 PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL PROPOSAL .......................................................................... .............................14 ATTACHMENTS..................................................................................................................... .............................17 Page 2 ,. Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 N. V Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 dd.e0T1;.. NARRATIVE 1) Are the HRA goals workable or are modifications necessary to make the process more realistic? The goals established by the City of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) are workable and align with Aeons mission to create and sustain quality affordable homes that strengthen lives and community. Maintaining existing affordability while ensuring that Indian Knoll Manor is a strong and vibrant asset for Mound residents is Aeon's focus for this project. Aeon will create scenarios and work closely with the HRA to ensure we accomplish our shared goals. We are confident that through this collaboration, we will identify and implement workable solutions for Mound residents, the HRA, and Aeon. HRA Goals: a) Maintain the Property as a strong and vibrant affordable housing community Yes. This goal speaks to Aeon's mission and the core of its work in the community. Aeon has been collaborating with communities for nearly three decades to develop and rehabilitate multi - family properties. Improving the physical asset for long -term success is only a part of the work. The most important aspect is to ensure that the residents have a platform and support for success. For instance, The Crest — 122 units in Brooklyn Center - had a 25% vacancy, deferred maintenance, and cost the city in police calls and other services. The property was in foreclosure when Aeon was selected to acquire it. The Crest is now fully occupied with quality residents, received nearly $2 million in physical upgrades, and has resident engagement activities, such as the new community garden plots ready to be planted this year. This is just one of numerous examples of Aeon's success in transforming properties into long -term community assets. b) Protecting the existing rental Price calculation as required by HUD Yes. Aeon will work tirelessly to ensure the existing affordable rents are protected for residents now and into the future. In Columbia Heights, we worked with the community, HUD, and Minnesota Housing to identify financing scenarios that protected existing affordability while still raising funds to implement $4 million of physical improvements. Aeon has creatively prevented thousands of lower- income residents from needless rent hikes as part of our mission to maintain affordable housing. At Sienna Green in Roseville, in addition to preserving the low rents, we were able to secure 30 project-based subsidies for residents who were currently paying over 30% (sometimes over 50 %) of their modest incomes towards their housing costs. The subsidies not only allowed the residents to remain after the rehabilitation, but they also were able to reduce their rent contribution to 30% of their income, allowing additional income to go toward food, clothing, and other basic necessities. Aeon is always inventive when developing opportunities for the strongest outcomes. C) Demonstrate the equivalent of the market Price will be reinvested into Property improvements Yes. One of Aeon's first steps will be to assemble a design team to evaluate the physical structure, immediate needs, and long -term needs. Aeon recognizes how critical it is to invest in existing buildings — ensuring that properties are durable, utility costs are low, and the buildings are redeveloped with a plan that will allow for the building to be maintained as a community asset, and a wonderful home Page 3 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and interest �? Aeon - 401 N. 3'a Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 z,ndIdeQn> for the residents. Aeon not only invests in the properties at the time of acquisition, we know that properties need to receive capital updates over time. For instance, we are in the midst of renovating 10 of Aeon's portfolio buildings that we've owned for decades (a total of 566 apartments) in Minneapolis to upgrade and preserve this community assets for generations to come. Aeon commits to investing the market equivalent price into Indian Knoll Manor. di Maintaining Mound's residency priority Yes. We will work with Mound and our funders to continue a preference for Mound residents at Indian Knoll Manor within the guidelines of required Fair Housing practices. We have been successful in creating priorities at other properties and will come up with a plan to do the some at Indian Knoll Manor. Page 4 w.r. Ind ion KnoII Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest .Aeon - 901 N. 31' Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 2) Describe your overall organization, e.g. size of company, assets held, mission statement. Include your organizations management and ownership experience. Overview: Creating and sustaining affordable homes is at the heart of all Aeon endeavors. For Aeon, "home" is not simply four walls and a roof, or just a place to sleep; instead, home is a place that is stable, safe, and healthy — shaped by the people who live there and the community around it. For nearly 30 years, Aeon has achieved excellence in: 1) Community Revitalization and Affordable Living: providing a critical community re- development service, transforming blighted and abandoned properties into quality apartment homes, and improving the livability of neighborhoods and residents; 2) Empowering Residents: helping residents build connections, become engaged in the community, and achieve stability in their lives; and, 3) Stewardship: managing assets to ensure properties remain a valuable community investment for generations to come. Vision and Mission: Aeon's vision is that every person has a home and is interconnected within community. Its mission is to create and sustain quality affordable homes that strengthen lives and communities. History Incorporated in 1986, the organization began as a grassroots effort to replace housing lost when the Minneapolis Convention Center was constructed. In 2003, Aeon expanded outside its primary focus area of downtown Minneapolis into the entire 11 - county Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Today, it has properties in Minneapolis, $t. Paul, Roseville, Chaska, and Brooklyn Center, and will begin operations at a property in Columbia Heights later this summer. In addition to local development and policy advocacy, Aeon is a leader on national policy and practice. We are known across the country for our advanced high - performance, healthy, and "green" building practices. Assets: By the end of 2015, Aeon will own and maintain nearly 2,400 apartments at 36 properties — over $300 million in community assets. Our portfolio is wide - ranging, and includes affordable apartment homes, mixed - income developments, and mixed -use projects with over 45,000 square feet of neighborhood scale commercial /retail. Aeon has preserved and redeveloped eight properties on the National Register of Historic Places, which is 18% of our portfolio. Resident Profile: Aeon serves a diverse resident population of over 4,200 people — consistently meeting the needs of residents with very low incomes as well as those with incomes approaching the area median income. We have demonstrated our ability to provide homes to a variety of ages and income levels, including senior citizens, individuals with disabilities, communities whose first language is one other than English, families with children, and formerly homeless adults and youth. Page 5 Ind ion Knoll Manor. Statement of Qualifications and Interest N t, Aeon - 901 M 316 Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 Faeon. Aeon is highly trained in working with diverse populations with varied needs. For example, Aeon manages over 500 apartments for households who have experienced chronic homelessness. We have had great success in providing homes and stability to the most vulnerable populations — many of which experience mental health challenges. Aeon is exceptionally skilled at understanding resident needs and can develop programming and service plans to allow residents with the greatest challenges to thrive. We are confident we will be able to accommodate the diverse needs of the population at Indian Knoll Manor. In March 2014, Aeon opened a 54 -unit senior independent living development in Chaska, MN. This property is subsidized with the HUD 202 PRAC program, allowing all residents to pay only 30% of their adjusted annual income. The site staff have been influential in ensuring that the residents remain interconnected in the community, even as some of them start to lose their mobility. At move -in, every resident receives a resource packet with information on Store to Door (a mobile grocery store), Walgreens delivery for prescriptions, and transportation information to help with everyday needs. In addition to these resources, management has established a number of monthly events for the residents including a knitting club, potlucks, and bingo. Within days of moving into the Landing to be closer to her family, Shirley O. stated, "This place is beautiful! I met a lady downstairs who doesn't have a car. I was going to the grocery store that night, so I offered to take her with me. Everything is so handy... grocery stores, a hardware store, Target and more." Aeons vision and mission to ensure that every resident is interconnected within community will be shared with the residents at Indian Knoll Manor. Key Strengths... Why Aeon? Any developer can provide four walls and a roof, but to create Home requires more than bricks and mortar. What differentiates Aeon? • A Solid Partner: Aeon has built enduring, loyal relationships with its funders, partners, and most importantly, residents. We have an excellent reputation in the community and have earned the trust of many. Aeon has the skills and capacity to assemble the most experienced and talented project teams that can deliver expected results. Aeon is honest and transparent in its work. • Blendina Creativity with Practicality: Aeon is known as an entrepreneurial organization that can conquer the most challenging and daunting problems. We are often asked to undertake projects that others have found to be insurmountable. Creative yet realistic financing is at the core of our work. Most of our projects require navigation through bureaucracy, policy, political sensitivities, and multi - layered governmental organizations. Though we often find ourselves on the leading edge, blazing a trail not yet explored, we are grounded in practicality and understand the importance of bottom line results. • Quality and Sustainability: Aeon approaches its work with sustainability in mind, knowing that we will forever be connected to every development. Physical (including environmental), financial, and social sustainability are analyzed for every project. When we build or renovate, we do so with future generations in mind. Aeon constructs or renovates sites according to smart, livable design and high sustainability standards. It invests in materials and uses methods that provide for the long -term durability of a building, and financially structures developments to support lower operations costs, sufficient operating revenue, and project reserves to provide proper building Page 6 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest C Aeon - 901 N. 316 Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 CNaeon, e, maintenance. Aeon's most recent project, The Rose, is currently under construction and embodies the principles of the Living Building Challenge. This highly innovative approach to sustainability includes materials, water, energy, health, site, equity, and beauty. The Rose will use 75 percent less energy than typically used under the energy code because of influences from the Living Building Challenge. Aeon prides itself on taking on innovations like the Living Building Challenge and adapting them in a way that works within our financial means while providing the best possible outcome. Community and Resident Engagement: Aeon assesses the needs and opportunities of a community through listening and authentic engagement, then aligns the work with plans and resources. Staff members engage in dialogue with residents and neighbors to discuss a project. We recognize the importance of building strong relationships and having open communication with our neighbors to best contribute to meeting greater community needs. Aeon's Resident Connections staff links residents to various kinds of resources, and when needed, Aeon enlists the support of third -party social service partners to provide additional support. For example, Valley has been an Aeon resident for nearly 10 years, living in one of our supportive housing properties with an active Resident Connections program. She was one of the founding members of the resident planning committee, a group that become a formal resident council under the guidance of the Resident Connections coordinator. Resident Connections staff members felt she was one of the strongest leaders in that group, and supported her in eventually serving on Aeon's Board of Directors and attending the NeighborWorks Community Leadership Institute in 2012, 2013 and 2014. Valley's leadership skills grew as a result of her work with the resident council and attendance at CLI and Personal Empowerment Training. As a result of this work, the Continental has seen an increase in the number of residents participating in activities, as well as reductions in overall turnover and negative exits. Size: Aeon is the largest nonprofit affordable housing provider in Minneapolis, and the second largest in Minnesota. Aeon has approximately 125 employees (including property management). Aeon's portfolio includes nearly 2,400 apartment homes (by the end of 2015). Organzation Management: Aeon has an experienced core leadership team focused on the vision, mission and values of the organization, while being dicipilined managers of financial resources. Attached is information about Aeon's executive team, housing development team, and property monagerment team. Ownership Experience: Every property that Aeon acquires or develops is meant for long -term ownership and management. We think in terms of 100 - 150 years when designing, constructing, and managing our properties. Aeon has never sold a property that it developed and has a philosophy against doing so. In fact, our dedication to long -term investment is the basis for our organization's name. The word "aeon" is the Latin form of eon, meaning "forever." We become true community partners in every area where we operate our properties — we invest in our shared communities for the long -term. Page 7 Indian KnoII Mona r. Statement of Quafifications and Interest Aeon - 901 H. V Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 t° facto 1. 3) Describe your organizations relevant experience in working with HUD Since its inception, Aeon has worked closely with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Aeon has both deep and broad experience with HUD programs including HOME, CDBG, Section 202 for Seniors, Section 8, FHA mortgage financing (221 d4, 221 d3, 223f, etc.), Mark to Market, and more. As such, Aeon has sophisticated staff capacity to assess and work through HUD regulations and guidebooks. We have positive and productive relationships with local HUD, PHA, and HRA staff in Minnesota, at HUD headquarters in Washington DC, and with other hub offices and satellites across the country. Aeon has an excellent record regarding compliance with HUD regulations for housing development and management. We are proactive in working with local and national legal counsel to obtain advice on complex technical matters that may arise in working through various HUD programs. Notable examples of our work with HUD include: The Crest Apartments, Brooklyn Center: Collaborated with HUD staff to remove a scheduled property from their foreclosure sale process and purchase it for $1. It was neither simple nor quick; however, we were able to secure and stabilize a notorious property that had been an ongoing community concern. The foreclosure process had very little promise of putting the property in the hands of an experienced and committed owner. We were focused on breaking the cycle of this problem property. In less than six months, we reduced vacancy from nearly 25% to less than 5% while maintaining our organizational resident screening expectations, which is based on requiring to respect the building, respect each other, and pay their portion of the rent. To ensure that The Crest Apartments was a safe and desirable community, residents that chose not to follow the rules were not permitted to stay at the building. Through our screening process, we connected with residents who were excited to move in and help shape the new culture of the property. With the building occupancy stabilized, we completed nearly $2 million of physical improvements. The Crest Apartments is now a community asset that serves 122 households. Portfolio Preservation Project, Minneapolis: Closed on a $58 million financing package to help preserve a 10- building portfolio and 566 affordable apartment homes in Minneapolis in February 2015. This portfolio was described by the Minneapolis HUD Office as one of the most complicated portfolios it had ever seen because most of the apartments had rents affordable to households at 30% -35% of the Area Median Income without the benefit of rental subsidy or operations support. Aeon found a way to preserve the rents, significantly improve the physical asset, and continue to serve the existing residents. This preservation project has helped the community retain a long -term investment in nearly 600 deeply affordable, high - quality apartment homes for residents (many of whom who are working critical service sector jobs in downtown Minneapolis). The Landing, Chaska: Constructed a high- efficient geothermal heating and cooling system in this property for seniors over age 62. HUD's Section 202 program was the primary funding source for this 54 unit property that opened in February 2014. The local electric utility had received funding to partially pay for installing geothermal systems, and we worked with HUD to leverage the expected utility savings to help offset the remaining costs of the geothermal system. W-M Indian Knoll Manor; Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 N. 31a Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 C° Con'- 4) Describe why your organization views that they can be successful in working through the CHAP conversion process. Aeon's substantial experience with HUD, both past and present, positions us for a productive and successful process with HUD to ultimately transition the property from the HRA to Aeon. We are accustomed to researching and understanding complex HUD processes and program guidelines, as well as assembling materials to create clear and compelling applications. We are unafraid to ask important questions and push the envelope with new and creative ideas. We are skilled listeners that will work to find solutions that best achieve shared goals. Since partnering with the City of Columbia Heights, we have extensively explored three distinct paths to transfer ownership of Parkview Villa from the HRA to Aeon, including Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD). This substantial research and work was done to ensure that we protected affordability and the residents. We spent time with the Minneapolis, Chicago, and Washington DC HUD offices to identify the best solution for Columbia Heights while RAD was still in its infancy. When the RAD tool was introduced, we worked with HUD and completed many of the initial steps for RAD approvals. Ultimately, we decided a different path, Voluntary Conversion, was the best solution for Parkview Villa. The RAD program is still in its early stages and only a handful of projects have been completed around the country. While Aeon has reviewed the RAD processes and guidelines, we retained two firms during our work at Parkview Villa with close working ties to HUD and who have since closed on RAD projects: • Duvernay + Brooks LLC, Emily Allison: Based in New York, Ms. Allison works with public housing authorities on a wide range of development activities, including RAD. In addition to her facilitating a 268 -unit RAD conversion in Lexington, North Carolina, she has served as financial advisory and worked on PHA mixed finance redevelopments throughout the country. Her clients have included the Denver and Philadelphia Housing Authorities. While working with us, she evaluated the possibility of using RAID at Parkview Villa when HUD was still developing some aspects of the RAD program. http:ZZwww.duvernaybrooks.com/home.htm • Hawkins, Delafield, & Wood LLP, Rod Solomon: With more than 30 years' experience in public housing and Section 8 voucher programs, Mr. Solomon has been at the forefront of RAD, Voluntary Conversion, and Dispositions in Washington DC. He has testified before Congress and completed eight years at HUD as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy. Mr. Solomon was instrumental in the Metropolitan Councils Voluntary Conversion process with HUD, and he has shepherded Parkview Villa through the approvals process. http:ZZwww.hawkins.com/ The technical aspects of RAD and completing the CHAP are challenging. If selected, Aeon would continue to partner with Ms. Allison and Mr. Solomon on this project throughout the CHAP, sale, and closing process. In addition to the technical aspects of the project, it is equally critical to build a solid relationship and promote clear communication with the residents. Many people call Indian Knoll Manor their home. We constantly strive to provide the best opportunity for our residents to have a safe, affordable, and quality home. In conjunction with the HRA, we would build a communication plan so that timely, Page 9 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 N.. 31a Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis PAN 55401 C.` ,Faeon understandable, and accessible information is shared with residents. At Parkview Villa, we regularly attended Resident Council and HRA meetings along with spending time at resident events. Our staff met with Parkview Villa residents to help assure them that our goal is not only to protect the existing affordability of their units but to also implement improvements and help build a stronger community. HUD's Voluntary Conversion process required us to hold very technical meetings with residents, many of whom were in their 80s and 90s. The technical information was challenging for many to understand and we held a series of meetings to "translate" the HUD regulations into an understandable, two -way conversation. By the end of the process, residents were calling Congressman Ellison's office to help expedite the process so Aeon could own the building faster! Page 10 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and interest C;' W ° Aeon - 909 N. 3'd Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 5) To maintain the goal of subsidized housing, what programs and /or financing would you attempt to put into place? Aeon has a successful track record of partnering with public, private, and philanthropic funders. Aeon has raised over $300 million in capital dollars over the last 29 years to support our development activities, ranging from supportive housing projects for homeless individuals to creating workforce and market rate housing, neighborhood scale commercial space, and public improvements. There are typically 10 to 30 sources of funding in every project we undertake — a testament to both the abilities of our staff to manage complex projects as well as the confidence our funders have in Aeon. Whether it be our recent projects in Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Roseville, or Chaska, Aeon is the partner of choice for completing preservation projects. To meet the city goals of a vibrant community while maintaining affordability, we have begun to explore several different funding opportunities to determine the most advantageous financing package, including: • Minnesota Housing Finance Agency – first mortgage financing (LMIR) and preservation funds (PARIF) • Hennepin County – HOME Program Funds • HUD – FHA insured mortgage program • HUD – Section 811 - Disabled populations • Mound – Tax Increment Financing and Reinvestment of Sale Proceeds into the building • Private Equity from the syndication of low income housing tax credits It will be critical to secure public funding partnerships with agencies such as HUD, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Hennepin County, and the City of Mound to maintain the existing level of affordability for the long -term, ensure stable operations, and address physical improvements. Many of these funding sources require long -term covenants and income and rent restrictions to ensure affordability for extended periods. The typical covenants are recorded declarations that are in effect for 20 to 30 years, though Aeon works to maintain a much longer timeframe. t Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and interest Aeon «901 N. V Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 ��°�aeon, _- 6) Would you contract management or do it through your parent organization? Aeon would conduct the property management through Aeon Management I.I.C. Aeon Management LLC has over 90 employees, and currently manages nearly 2,300 apartment homes. Each property has a site manager, building technician and maintenance technician. Many properties also have an assistant site manager, plus a Resident Connections coordinator in order to accommodate the needs of the property's population. It is a wholly owned subdivision of Aeon. Aeon Management LLC prides itself on screening residents to determine the ability of the household to succeed at the property. A criminal background check, living history evaluation, and credit check are part of the application process for all residents. Though residents sign a lease with significant detail, Aeon expects residents to do three things: 7 ) Pay their rent: whether it is subsidized or market rate, rents need to be paid so that we can properly maintain the building. 2) Respect neighbors in and around the property: it is our intent to provide a safe and inclusive living experience. 3) Respect the property: we plan on operating and maintaining a quality home for generations, and cannot afford to have residents who purposefully damage the space. Every applicant is coming to Aeon with a different situation. Our leasing call center staff works with the applicant to find a building that is best going to fit the individual's or household's needs. Because of the diverse nature of Aeon's portfolio, our management staff is able to place the applicants in a building where they will be able to thrive and meet the demands of the three general requirements (pay their rent, respect their neighbors and respect the property). Management staff work with residents to ensure they are meeting these requirements, but will take action if they are not being met to ensure the peaceful enjoyment for the rest of the property. Aeon Management LLC is comprised of experienced property management professionals who have been in the industry for many years and have expertise in managing affordable and supportive housing, as well as market rate apartments. Please see attached for brief biographies of key property management staff. Page 12 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 H. 91d Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MIN 55401 evdem 7) Would you add any services to what exists or continue as is? Aeon will pursue solutions that provide for the continuation and expansion of the services and programming currently in place at Indian Knoll Manor in order to support housing stability and a sense of home for the residents. In doing so, Aeon's building management and Resident Connections teams will evaluate the existing services by conducting a thorough assessment of the residents needs and desires to determine the current service plan's strengths and where it could be improved. This analysis will help forge the route Aeon will ultimately take for implementing supportive services. Aeon has two models to provide services and resources to residents. The first is through our internal Resident Connections team, which works closely with our property management staff to pinpoint opportunities for group- focused activities (such as resident picnics, or workshops on topics such as budget management), and individual support when a resident may need very specific assistance to support a health issue or other personal situation. Aeon may also partner with third -party service agencies to provide regular activities or case management to populations who need a greater degree of support. For instance, our properties for formerly homeless households have 24/7, on -site case managers and front desk staff to ensure the needs of the households are being met. Aeon closely evaluates each property and population in order to ensure the right level of support. One of Aeon's oldest properties, Paige Hall, is located in downtown Minneapolis. The Resident Connections coordinator has been working with the management staff and residents to create a program to form social connections within the building and the community. One of the goals is to empower residents while also providing support to create lasting change. The program at Paige Hall incorporates the use of floor captains — residents who are well -known in the building, willing to participate, and interested in inspiring others to take ownership in their building. With the help of the Resident Connections coordinator, the floor captains have established meals, activities for children, and informational sessions on various topics. In fall 2013, the Paige Hall floor captain team received a grant to attend the NeighborWorks America's Community Leadership Institute, where they refined their outreach plan, learned about community building, and also received training on how to be more effective as floor captains. Since the training, the involvement in the floor captains program has grown exponentially and the Resident Connections staff has been able to step back and simply provide support when needed. In the event that a greater level of support is needed at any Aeon property, Aeon has established relationships with a number of service providers throughout the Twin Cities area. Most recently, at The Rose, we are expanding our existing partnership with RS Eden to provide supportive services for long- term homeless residents. in addition, we have established relationships with Youth Link, Simpson Housing, Resource Inc., Oak Grove, Cabrini, People Inc., South Metro, and Carver County. We are also currently working on a project with Touchstone Mental Health to develop a plan for Health Supportive Housing in downtown Minneapolis. Aeon believes in reducing barriers to housing stability through appropriate supportive services. The services will solely depend upon the residence and the population served in order to create the greatest impact for residents. Page 13 Indian KnaR Manor: 5fafemenf of QuolF €kations and interest aeon Aeon = 90T N. 3b Street, Su ite 150, Minneopol'os 81W 55401 PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL PROPOSAL 8) The HRA desires to have parties submit a proposal regarding the purchase price /amount that will be reinvested in the property and provide a pro -forma income statement that also shows the RAD rents established by HUD. It is understood that this pricing proposal will be general in nature, and will serve only as a starting point for negotiations since the type of programs, interest rates, HUD approval requirements, HRA goals, etc. may all have an impact on the final agreement. Overview Aeon is dedicated to preserving long -term affordability in its own portfolio as well as at Indian Knoll Manor. In order to maintain existing affordability at Indian Knoll Manor while addressing physical needs, any proforma scenario requires deep analysis and close coordination with the HRA and potential funding partners. We look forward to working with the HRA to identify a shared vision and a financial model that implements that vision. While the RAD program offers a predictable and reliable source of rental support, the Signet Partners financial analysis notes that the relatively low contract rents make it challenging to generate a mortgage to offset project costs. Nevertheless, the RAD program requires us to address certain physical needs, and Aeon agrees that it will be necessary to invest in the property to ensure long -term financial, physical, and community sustainability. When Aeon purchased The Crest Apartments in Brooklyn Center, we successfully leveraged the $1 purchase price into nearly $2 million of physical improvements through a combination of funding sources. Each project has a unique set of circumstances, however, Aeon's experience and diligence to implement solid financial solutions will be identical. Investing in Indian Knoll Manor A preliminary analysis of multi - family properties in close proximity to Indian Knoll Manor suggests a property value approximately between $2.4 and $2.6 million. A full Capital Needs Assessment (CNA) will be necessary to determine the actual extent of work needed at the property. However, based on our experience of typical costs per unit for rehabilitation projects, we would tentatively plan on approximately $45,000 - $55,000 per unit (or between $2,250,000 and $2,750,000). This renovation work could occur in phases while still addressing immediate needs. As a long -term owner, Aeon commits to investing the comparable sale price into the property over time. In order to accomplish the goals for Indian Knoll Manor, we will work with you to identify a combination of strategies to meet the property's long -term physical and operational needs. These strategies could include one or more of the following: • Raising capital funds for physical improvements through the Low - income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, Minnesota Housing, and /or Aeon's philanthropic sources; • Implementing energy improvements to reduce operating costs; • Working with the local building official, building contractors, and HUD to further examine the idea of converting the efficiency apartments to one - bedroom apartments to secure a slightly higher RAD rental rate; Page 14 Indian KralI h(wnor. Statement of Qualifications end Interest Aeon - ¢61 IF. S`d Sireei, Suite 150, Minneapolis AIN 55401 • Evaluating the concept of incorporating some new units into the building with somewhat higher rents to help offset the lower RAD rents; • Analyzing tax increment financing or tax abatement to leverage funds for capital improvements; and, • Reviewing HUD's Voluntary Conversion program as an alternate or in addition to RAD. The above list is not intended to be all - inclusive but the start of a menu of ideas to meet the project goals and funder requirements. We would work with your HRA to prepare a process and timeline that allows us to investigate these and other ideas without disrupting the CHAP Timeline. We can then deeply evaluate the pros and cons to select a repertoire of mutually workable solutions. With the fairly tight timeline associated with the CHAP process, the review may warrant a two prong approach to ensure that the RAID process stays on track while we continue exploring additional ideas in parallel to the RAID program steps. Pro -forma Income Statements The income and expense statements reviewed in the Signet Partners report show a slim margin between income and expenses, which is why they note the limited ability to raise funds through a payable mortgage without additional income sources. Using the existing data, our income statement analysis would likely produce a similar result and preparing a new income statement without discussing the financing options with the HRA may be a bit presumptuous. Reviewing the options and variables with the HRA makes it possible to produce a detailed proforma for a productive discussion. We want to ensure that our analysis aligns with the community goals while producing a financially stable apartment home property. The HRH's willingness to commit the comparable property value back to the project positions us for funding through competitive state and county resources. If selected, a detailed project sources, uses, and cash flow projections would be reviewed with the HRA to determine the most workable course of action for Indian Knoll Manor. Aeon's work is based upon developing relationships, open communication, and transparency. We look forward to working with the HRA and building a partnership for this property. .....Page 15 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 N. 31d Street, Suite 350, Minneapolis MN 55403 ATTACHMENTS Yuw11y 1. Aeon's Leadership Team, Housing Development Team, Property Management Team, and Resident Connections Team 2. Aeon's Awards 3. References and Letters of Support 4. Aeon's Property Overview Page 17 Indian Knoll Manor. Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 N. 3,d Street,, Suite. 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 Attachment 1 Aeon's Leadership Team Arthur, President and CEO 1 aeon. 'Alan has served as the president /chief executive officer of Aeon since 1988. Alan oversees the organization's 2,200 affordable apartment homes in the Twin Cities metropolitan area and brings more than 40 years of experience in housing and real estate development, including construction, project development, lending, code enforcement and city planning. He earned a B.A. in political science from Benedictine College in Atchison, Kansas. Alan teaches affordable housing development, financing and organizational governance issues to a variety of organizations, and serves on numerous local and national housing boards and task forces Gina Ciganik, Vice President, Housing Development Gina has been a member of Aeon's housing development team since 1997 and leads Aeon's real estate development activities. She has broad experience in financing and '!developing mixed -use, mixed - income neighborhood revitalization projects and public improvement initiatives. Gina also has a strong knowledge of rehab management with single - family homes, duplexes and apartments. She has successfully developed both large - scale and smaller neighborhood -scale projects. She continues to improve sustainable development efforts by forming key partnerships with organizations such as the University of Minnesota's Center for Sustainable Building Research and Minnesota Green Communities. She is currently leading the only known Minnesota project striving for Living Building Challenge adherence. Gina previously worked as a Redevelopment Specialist for the City of Brooklyn Park, Minnesota and earned a B.S. degree in housing from the University of Minnesota. Angela Emmrich, Director of Human Resources & Administration Angela joined Aeon in 2008 and brings more than 14 years of Human Resource Management experience. Prior to joining Aeon, Angela worked as an Associate and Director of Human Resources of Property Solutions and Services, I.I.C. She directs the day - ,to -day operations of the organization's human resources and administration team including IT, employee relations, benefits, performance management, training and development, compensation, recruitment and staffing, leave administration and worker's compensation. Angela is a certified Professional in Human Resources through HR Certification Institute. Katie Haas, Director of Supportive Services and Resident Connections Katie joined Aeon in the summer of 2011 with six years of professional experience in anti- poverty social services and permanent supportive housing. Katie has worked as a case manager with youth in permanent supportive housing, as a program manager and program evaluator. She believes that quality affordable housing is central to the goal of alleviating poverty and is inspired by Aeon's vision of "home ". Katie graduated from the University of Minnesota with graduate degrees in Social Work and Public Policy. Page 18 Indian Knoll Manor. Statement of Qualifications and tnteresP Aeon - 901 N. 3r6 Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55901 f' aeon Caroline Horton, Chief Financial Officer Caroline is responsible for Aeon's real estate asset management, finance and accounting functions. She has expertise in developing management systems that ensure the long -term viability of assets and monitor organizational risk factors. Since 2007, Caroline has been a member of the STRENGTH MATTERSTA9 CFO Working Group which has developed a series of white papers on external reporting best practices for the nonprofit affordable housing industry. Caroline earned her BSBA in accounting from Boston University School of Management, and is a CPA (inactive). She was recognized as one of the 2013 Top Women in Finance by Finance & Commerce. She has been with Aeon since 1998. Jenny Johnson, Vice President, Resource Development Jenny Johnson joined Aeon in 2007 and brings more than twelve years of fund development and outreach experience in varied non - profit settings, including a Habitat for Humanity affiliate in Chicago, Children's Home Society of Minnesota, and Cornerstone Advocacy Service. Jenny is responsible for overseeing resource development activities and is committed to furthering Aeon's mission by connecting the community to Aeon's work. She holds a B.A. in sociology from North Park University in Chicago and serves on the Board of Directors of the Minnesota Women's Consortium. Chris Nimmer, Vice President, Property Operations Chris Nimmer has been a member of Aeon's property management team since September 2011. He has more than 20 years of property management experience with all types of real estate. Most recently, Chris served as a portfolio director at Aeon. Prior to working at Aeon, he was CEO of LaSalle Management Group, a third party property management firm with a diverse portfolio of properties that included project based section 8, tax credit and home owner association structures. He also has experience managing class A high -rise properties for Carlson Real Estate Company and Zeller Management Group. Chris received his Bachelor's degree from the University of Minnesota in economics and math and is a previous Board Chair for St. Paul Building Owners and Managers Association. Eric Schnell, Chief Operations Officer Eric joined Aeon as its operations leader in January 2013. He oversees Aeon's organizational strategies and implementation that ensure effective and efficient operations. He served the University of Minnesota Twin Cities' Office for Equity and Diversity as its chief administrative officer for five years. He brings 16 years of management and administration experience from the University, where he developed long -range strategies that achieve the organization's mission and evaluated its progress toward achievement. Eric has a master's degree in education from Colorado State University. Page 19 J..w Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest � Aeon _ 901 N. 31d Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 4�4�i�00T1, Housing Development Staff James Lehnhoff, Director of Housing Development James, an accredited city planner, came to Aeon in August 2010. His breadth of experience working with local Minnesota governments includes preparing comprehensive plans and ordinances; evaluating development proposals; and engaging the community in development projects. Prior to joining Aeon, James served for nearly five years as the Community Development Director and the City Planner for the City of Arden Hills. In this role, he led the planning, building, and inspection services for the community. James earned a B.A. in urban geography from the University of Minnesota - Duluth and a Master's in urban and regional planning from the Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota. Bryant Au, Project Manager Bryant joined Aeon in June 2013 after graduating from Bradley University with a B.A. degree in economics and political science. He previously interned with the Congress for the New Urbanism, a Chicago -based advocate for traditional mixed - use /mixed- income walkable neighborhoods. While at Bradley he also participated in studies regarding the University's long range housing plan, where he engaged local citizens on behalf of the local planning commission as a part of their long -term visioning and planning. Leslie Roaring, Project Manager Leslie joined Aeon in July 2011 as an assistant site manager, where she helped manage ten properties within Aeon's portfolio. In October 2012, Leslie transitioned to the compliance department and spent the next few years as a compliance specialist. Most recently, Leslie jointed the housing development team as a project manager. Leslie holds a Bachelors of Design in Architecture with a minor in Landscape Architecture from the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities. Teresa Skaar, Executive Assistant to the Vice President Teresa joined Aeon in July 2011. She supports the Vice President of Housing Development and the development team in a number of ways, including development of metrics and measures, design of marketing sheets and presentations, preparation of grants applications, IT support, and furnishing selections for new developments. With 10 years of experience as a marketing and office manager in the field of architecture — most notably with the award winning firm KVA—r- in Boston — she brings an eye for design, creative problem solving skills, and the ability to quickly change priorities to best support the team. Teresa grew up in Minnesota and attended both the University of Minnesota and Boston University. Miranda Walker, Project Manager Miranda joined Aeon in 2012. She has a range of professional and volunteer experiences that include work with Hands On Twin Cities and Habitat for Humanity. Miranda also spent a year as an AmeriCorps VISTA in the Mississippi Delta where she coordinated a regional farmer's market network. She earned a B.A. in cinema and media culture and a master's in urban and regional planning from the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota. Property Management Team Karen Barton, Compliance Manager Karen has been working in the housing industry for more than 10 years. During that time, she has received the C3P Certification through Spectrum Training and holds the Assisted Housing Manager certification through Quadel. Karen also regularly attends annual updates and seminars on various housing programs including Housing Tax Credits, Section 8, and HOME funds. As Compliance Manager for Aeon Management, she Page 20 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon _ 901 H. 3'd Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MTV 55401 (ae0n, prepares annual owner's certifications, oversees all certifications and re- certifications completed by site staff, trains site staff so they may obtain all appropriate documentation to ensure resident eligibility and maintains the procedures manual used by site staff. She holds a B.A. in English and a B.S. in Biology, both from the University of Minnesota. Steve Plotz, Director of Property Improvements Steve joined Aeon in 2008 as Director of Property Improvements. He directs the day -to -day operations of the organization's maintenance division — negotiating with contractors and vendors on construction and maintenance related matters. Prior to joining Aeon, Steve worked as Vice President of Property Solutions and Services, LLC and has more than 25 years' experience in residential and commercial construction. Steve is certified as a Housing Quality Standards Inspector and has held a Minnesota Real Estate Salesperson License since 2006. William J. Thurmes, Portfolio Director Bill joined Aeon in September of 2014 as a Portfolio Director. Prior to that, he worked as a Property Manager at U.S. Bank Center in Saint Paul for eight years. Previously, Bill was an Assistant Vice President /Director of Operations for American Security LLC. He currently serves as the Chairperson for the Board of Directors of the Greater Saint Paul Building Owners and Managers Association, and is on the Board of Directors for the Capitol River Council. As a Portfolio Director for Aeon, Bill is responsible for about one third of the total property portfolio. Danelle Weintzweig, Portfolio Director Danelle has been in property management for more than 13 years, including a third party property management company specializing in section 42 funded cooperatives and supportive housing for the homeless that required sobriety. In 2008 she joined Aeon as a property manager at the Portland Franklin Gateway project in Minneapolis now known as the South Quarter. She currently works for Aeon as a Portfolio Director overseeing half of Aeon's properties, most of which are located in Elliot Park and the Phillips Neighborhoods in Minneapolis. Anika Yokanovich, Portfolio Director Anika began her career in property management in 1995 as Site Manager for a property in St. Paul. In 1997 she was promoted to a Regional Property Manager position with a diverse portfolio of market rate and affordable properties throughout the Midwest. Anika's affordable housing experience includes Project - based Section 8, Section 236, Section 42, and USDA -Rural Development. Anika's management experience has given her a wide range of properties within various portfolios including rural, urban, affording, and luxury housing. In June 2013 Anika joined Aeon as a Portfolio Director responsible for approximately half of Aeon's total portfolio. Resident Connections Team Susan Edwards, Resident Connections Coordinator Susan Edwards joined Aeon in 2012 after moving to Minneapolis from Washington, D.C. She previously worked as a case manager in a transitional housing program for homeless families, a program manager in a residential drug treatment facility and a mental health therapist in an outpatient community clinic. Susan graduated from Cornell University and Howard University School of Social Work. She is also a licensed clinical social worker. Page 21 Indian Knoli Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest; _ Aeon -40i N. 31d Street, Suite 750, Min neapolis MN 55401 Rodo Rabi, Resident Connections Coordinator Roda Rabi serves as a Resident Connections Coordinator. Roda joined Aeon in January 2015 with 13 years of experience as a legal advocate at the Domestic Abuse Project. She speaks multiple languages and brings a wealth of knowledge of the Twin Cities supportive services networks. She has brings extensive experience advocating and organizing for strong communities. Molly Wulf, Resident Connections Manager Molly joined the Resident Connections team as a coordinator in the spring of 2012 and was recently promoted to her current position as Resident Connections manager. She came to Aeon with more than 10 years of supervisory experience in residential settings in Wisconsin, Arizona and Minnesota. Molly has worked with individuals with developmental disabilities and mental health issues in group home or crisis home settings, as well as children placed by child protective services due to abuse, abandonment or neglect. Molly graduated with a B.A. in Psychology and Criminal Justice from the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire. Page 22 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and Interest Aeon - 901 N. 31a Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 Affachment 2 Aeon's Awards Aeon emphasizes quality, community connection and sustainability in all of its developments. The following sample of awards illustrates Aeon's significant impact in the community. 2013 "Affordable Housing Design Award" AIA Minnesota /McKnight Foundation for Renaissance Box 2012 "Outstanding /Innovative Resident Service: Continuous" MADACS Award from Minnesota Multi Housing Association for Aeon's Connect Share -a -Meal Program Best in Real Estate Award Finalist, Multifamily Development or Redevelopment — Affordable, Minneapolis /St Paul Business Journal for Sienna Green Phase II Other Awards 2011 "Adaptive Reuse Award" from Preservation Alliance of Minnesota for Renaissance Box 2010 "Top Projects" from Finance & Commerce for Alliance Addition 2010 "Best Multi - Family Rental Development Award" from Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal for Alliance Addition 2009 "National Award of Excellence for Sustainable Community Development," presented to both Aeon and the City of Minneapolis, by The Home Depot Foundation for Ripley Gardens 2009 "Outstanding Performance Award, Best in Class" for Aeon's exceptional loss performance and risk management from Housing Partnership Insurance Exchange 2009 "Top Project Award" from Finance and Commerce for The Wellstone 2009 National "Green Building of America Award" from the Real Estate & Construction Review for The Wellstone 2008 National "Semi- finalist award" for East Village in the I. Donald Terner Prize for Innovation and Leadership in Affordable Housing 2008 "Top Project Award" for Ripley Gardens from Finance and Commerce 2008 National "Semi- finalist award" for Alliance Apartments in the MetLife Foundation Awards for Excellence in Affordable Housing 2008 "Merit Award" for Ripley Gardens from American Institute of Architects Minnesota 2008 "Adaptive Reuse Project" for Ripley Gardens in the 2008 Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Awards 2008 "Environmental Initiative Award Finalist: Green Building and Development" for Ripley Gardens from the Minnesota Environmental Initiative 2008 National "Honorable Mention Maxwell Award" for St. Barnabas from the Fannie Mae Foundation and the Partnership to End Long Term Homelessness 2007 "Outstanding Adaptive Reuse of a Historic Building Award" for Crane Ordway from the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission 2007 "Economic Impact Award" for Ripley Gardens from the Minnesota Commercial Real Estate Women (MN CREW) 2007 "Best Community Impact Award" for Ripley Gardens from Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal 2007 "Best Multi- family Rental Development Award" for Clover Field Marketplace from Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal 2006 "Best Community Impact Award" for The Jourdain from Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal 2005 "Children's Leadership Award" for St. Barnabas Apartments from The Sheltering Arms Foundation 2004 "Project of the Year" award for The Lamoreaux Expansion from the Minnesota Construction Association Page 23 Indian Knoll Manor: Statement of Qualifications and interest Aeon _ 901 N. 3'd Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 W eon 2003 "Smart Growth Design Award" for East Village mixed - income, mixed use project from 1000 Friends of Minnesota 2001 "Quality of Life" award for 1822 Park Apartments from the Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce 2001 Award for "significant achievement in design and aesthetic excellence" for East Village from the Minneapolis Committee on Urban Environment (CUE) 2001 "Most Innovative Housing Project" award for East Village from the Minneapolis Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP) 2000 National "Maxwell Award of Excellence" Honorable Mention for the Phillips ReDesign housing project from the Fannie Mae Foundation 2000 Award for "significant achievement in design and aesthetic excellence" for "Celebrating Families in Phillips, Boys and Girls Club" event from CUE 1999 National "Maxwell Award of Excellence" Finalist for Alliance Apartments from the Fannie Mae Foundation 1999 National "John J. Gunther Blue Ribbon Best Practices" award for Alliance Apartments from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 1999 National "Excellence in Affordable Housing" Honorable Mention for the Youth Housing Project (The Archdale) from the Metropolitan Life Foundation 1999 "Diversity Award" from the Minneapolis Foundation 1999 "Community Award" from the Federal Home Loan Bank 1999 "Achievement" award from the Greater Minneapolis Metropolitan Housing Corporation 1997 National "Maxwell Award of Excellence" Honorable Mention, from the Fannie Mae Foundation, for Housing Project for Homeless Youth (The Archdale) 1995 Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission award, for renovation of the Continental Hotel 1993 Two "Neighborhood Environment" awards from CUE, for the Continental Hotel & The Lamoreaux 1993 National "Maxwell Award of Excellence" Honorable Mention for Opportunity Housing (Continental, Lamoreaux & Coyle) from the Fannie Mae Foundation 1993 "Adaptive Re -Use Award" for The Lamoreaux from Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission 1992 "Historic Rehab Award" for historic renovation in the South 9th Street Historic District, for The Adams and The Roselle (Roselle & Melrose) from the Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission 1989 MCDA Partnership Award for Affirmative Hiring of Women and Minorities 1988 Certificate of Commendation from the Governor of Minnesota 1988 Award for "moving the cause of and communities of color forward" from the MN National Association of Minority Contractors 1987 Design Award for Buri Manor from CUE Page 24 a Indian Knoll Manor. Statement of Qualifications and tnteresB N,�y -��n Aeon - 901 N. 31d Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis MN 55401 i Attachment 3 References and Letters of Support Gary Eitel, Director of Business & Development City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 763- 569 -3300 geitel@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us Jeffrey Dahl, Assistant City Administrator City of Chaska 1 City Hall Plaza Chaska, MN 55318 952- 227 -7529 jdahl @chaskamn.com Walter Fehst, City Manager and HRA Executive Director City of Columbia Heights 590 40th Ave NE Columbia Heights, MN 55421 763- 706 -3610 walt.fehst@ci.columbia-heights.mn.us Patrick Trudgeon, City Manager City of Roseville 2660 Civic Center Drive Roseville, MN 55113 651- 792 -7021 patrick.trudgeon@cityofroseville.com Page 25 (763) 569 -3335 aprtl 20, 2 €115 Catherine Pausche Cite of 'Mound 2.115 l4'ils.h:re: Blvd. Mound, STN 55:364 Re: AeonaLetter of Support Dear Ms. Pausche: please consider this letter of support in Aeon "s current application to the City of Motand's I titrl. The Go- of Brooklyn Center considers itself fortunate rfiat Aeon. a non -profit developer, owner and manager of high-- qualitt affordable apartment homes in the a\limeapolis /St. Paul area, was the successful bidder of the 2012 HULA foreclosure sale of the 122 unit apartment building known as View Pointe at Shingle Creek ;apartment. Nov- mined The Crest Apartments, Aeon has made considerable investments into certain ph-, sical impim incine to the building and grounds, and put is place their property mnanagerrent skills to ensure a quahri ht ing c_:perience for its resideeits. The Cit1 recognizes and greoth appreciates ,aeon's long rem, commitment to providing quality affordable housing opportunities avithin our comrnunit,r and the metropolitan area. Sincerely, f.1 O�3 L � (,art Fatel Director of Business & Development Cit; of Brooklyn Center GUY feat k m trtti;ntey `'t ote, :r odi; e t" t e C. ep r "tmv,,, is 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 6645 Flumbold? Avenue Nodh Brooklyn Center, VIN 55430 -2199 Brooklgn Center, MN 55430 - 2199 &ookiyn Center, MN 55430 -1953 763.569.3300 Fax: 763.569.3494 763.569 3400 Fax: 763.569 3434 763.569.3333 Fax: 763.561.0717 April 17, 2015 Catherine Pausche City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Re: Aeon Letter of Support Dear Ms. Pausche: Because of our successful partnership with Aeon on two projects in the City of Chaska, I am writing to express my support for Aeon's proposal to acquire Indian Knoll Manor. In 2008, Aeon opened Clover Field Marketplace, which provides 117 high quality, affordable, apartment homes and new commercial space in Chaska. This groundbreaking project enhanced the housing opportunities in the City of Chaska and helped advanced the City's comprehensive plan for that part of the community. Building on the success at Clover Field Marketplace, Aeon completed The Landing in downtown Chaska in February 2014. The Landing complements the historic downtown area with its careful attention to architectural details while providing 54 affordable apartment homes to residents over age 62. Aeon has taken great care to work with City, businesses, and residents to create developments that are long -term assets for the community. Additionally, a new sidewalk was built connecting downtown to the Minnesota River trail further enhancing the area. Clover Field Marketplace and the Landing are examples of how Aeon worked creatively and effectively with HUD, local, state, and private funders to develop high- quality homes that will be affordable for generations to come. Please contact me at 952- 227 -7529 or Bahl chaskamn.com if you have any additional questions regarding my support for Aeon and their work in Chaska. Sincerely, Jef &ey Dahl Assistant City Administrator City of Chaska City ®f ChcauskaMinnesota One City Hall Plaza 55318 -1962 Phone 952/448 -9200 1 Fax 952/448 -9300 CITY OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS S90 -40f6 Avenue NE, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 -3878 (763) 706 -3600 T00 (763) 706 -3692 Visit our website ot� www.ci calumb(o�herghts.mxr:us HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY April 20, 2015 Catherine Pausche City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Re: Aeon Letter of Support Dear Ms. Pausche, In 2011, the City of Columbia Heights Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) selected Aeon as a partner to transition ownership of Parkview Villa to Aeon. Based on our experience with Aeon, we strongly support their proposal to purchase Indian Knoll Manor from the City of Mound HRA. Parkview Villa provides apartment homes to senior and disabled residents in Columbia Heights. We selected Aeon as our partner because of their extensive experience with local, state, and federal funding sources along with their track record of providing quality apartment homes, management, and support services. Over the last four years, Aeon has demonstrated their perseverance through a complicated regulatory process with HUD to secure approvals through the Voluntary Conversion program. We explored many scenarios, including RAD. Through it all, Aeon continued forward and we should now complete the sale this summer. Aeon has also worked to build relationships with the residents, many of whom were nervous and concerned about the process. Through our partnership, the residents will maintain their existing levels of affordability while benefiting from over $4 million of physical improvements. The residents are now excited for Aeon to accept ownership! Aeon is a committed partner, and we encourage you to consider their application. Please contact me at (763) 706 -3610 if you have any additional questions regarding my support for Aeon and their work in Columbia Heights. Sincerely, Walter Fehst City Manager and HRA Executive Director ,n Cuanciiepemhers -vp Cif: lsrtvgrr.. et F, ya WAWA 0 S JIB %VI//1 yj April 17, 2015 Catherine Pausche City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Re: Aeon Letter of Support I am writing to express my support for Aeon as a potential partner to the City of Mound to purchase Indian Knoll Manor. We have witnessed Aeon's dedication to the development and management of high quality affordable apartment homes at Sienna Green in Roseville. Sienna Green, formerly known as Har Mar apartments, has 120 one bedroom units that were constructed in 1965. Before Aeon purchased the property, many units had fallen into disrepair and barely half the units were occupied. In 2010, Aeon put together a successful partnership that transformed the property. Once a source of criminal activity, Sienna Green is now filled with residents, gardens, a playground, and sidewalks that connect the property to the rest of the community. Building on that success, Aeon opened a second phase with 50 new apartments in 2012 on what had been a vast, crumbling asphalt parking lot. The second phase is home to families, offers a resident community room, front porches, and a fitness room. Sienna Green is an example of how Aeon is creative and effective in working with local, state, federal government, and private funders to develop and manage a community asset. Please contact me at patrick.trudgeonna cityofroseviUe.com or by phone at 651- 792 -7021 if you have any additional questions regarding my support for Aeon and their work in Roseville. Sincerely, Patrick T11 -1 geon,CityManager City of Roseville 2660 Civic Center Drive •S Roseville, Minnesota 55113 651-792 -7673 •:• www.ei.roseville.nnn.us Attachment 4 , Homes for Generations Properties overview Fact Sheet Aeon serves more than 4,000 people each year in more than 2,000 quality, affordable apartment homes. This is a look at Aeon's 36 properties in ivlinneapolis, St. Paul, Chaska, Roseville and Brooklyn Center. 1822 Park 18 apartments In 2008, Aeon completed the renovation to create affordable homes for formerly homeless and those with mental health issues. Aeon collaboares with Oak Grove Care Center to promote residents' health and wellvess. The Balmoral 58 apartments Aeon carefully renovated and restored this once - elegant 1917 building. Details outriding door hardware, fixtures and wood., carpeting, preserve its historic integrity. It tamed Area a 1992 Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission award. Children's Village Center 36 apartments Children's Village Center opened in 2004 as the fast milestone of the South Quartos development. Neu downtown Minneapolis, it offers affordable homes for Families and individuals. The Crest Apartments 122 apartments Avon's 2012 purchase ,['the Crest Apartments has stabilized it so quality, affordable housing for residents and as a community asset for Brooklyn Center. The Adams 75 apartments Condemned and boarded ,hen purchased, the Adams was renovated and no, boasts a streetscape incorporating historic lighting, attractive plantings and public art to herald the entryway to do,n[own Minneapolis. The Barrington 26 aparnments At the request of Elliot Park Neighborhood, Inc., Aeon renovated this condemned building in 1991. Aeon worked with the neighborhood to provide both homes for low- to-moderate incomes and apartments that rout closer to mazk,t rate. Clover Field Marketplace 117 apartments Clover Field Marketplace in Chaska opened in 2008 as .Avon's Fort suburban property. Designed to ensure suburban residents have access to affordable homes, it offers mixed - income units, commercial and green space. The Coyle 26 apertrne,to At the request of Sorrier residents, Aeon transformed this building from a community liaboty into it well- mau:ged asset It's home to 26 forrnr dy homeless individuals. Alliance Apartments 184 apartments Collaborating with RS Eden and Alliance Housing, Aeon created quality affordable housing for formerly homeless adults in a sober, community. The 61 homes at Alliance Addition opened in 2011. Bari Manor 38 apectments Completed in 1987, Buri Manor ,as Aeon's fi rst development, built in response to housing lost in the budding of the Minneapolis Convention Center. It received a Design Aoard Sore the City of Minneapolis Committee on the Urban Environment. Continental Hotel 70 apartments Listed ou the National Register of Historic Places, the Continental is one of the last single-roore- occupancy hotels in M int"po6s. Its rc .... don, including preservudon Fire bronze doors, moo Awn two city awards. East Village 180 apartments This award- winning Awn development creates a thriving community in the Elliot Park neighborhood. The Archdale 30 apartments This 1996 Aeon- YouthLink partnership created some of the first apartments for homeless youth in the country. The building uudetwevt substantial renovations in 2008. Chicago Avenue Apartments 60 apartments An enclosed outdoor play area is our feature of these three buildings, all renovated by Aeon. Others include a computer resonme mom and Aeon staff to help residents connect to educational opportunities. Crane Ordway 70 aparenenes Aeon has renovated thus historic nazehowe building in downtown St. Paul to create 70 affordable efficiency units for working adults The hvo street - facing historic facades have remained unchanged. Elliot Court 57 apartments With close proximity to downtown Minneapolis, Mier Court provides quality efficiency apartments. 901 North 3`tl Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 • (612) 341 -3148 • FAX (612)341 -4208 • yr waeommn ore The Elms 81 apartments Once considered the neighborhood's worst "problem" property, Aeon renovated the budding and transformed its oTinstion. Now it provides effidenc} and one - bedroom apartments for people with very low incomes. The Heritage 16 apartments This 1880, building had been gutted by Fire when Neon began renovations. One seenon once was the childhood home of ml magnate John Paul Getty. This beautifully renovated, historic building now provides efficiencies for formerly homeless individuals. The Jonrdain 41 apartments 'Ihe Jourdaiu is the second phase of the South Quarter development —a parmrrship of Hope Cbrnmuniry, Ine, and Aeon — that brings housing and commercial space to it high - traffic intersection. The Lamoreaux 73 apartments The Lamoreanc was a vacant beaded building when Aeon transformed it. Now, Aeon has added three additional stories, adding critically needed, single - room dwellings for downtown Minneapolis workers. The Maryland 79 apartments Aeon punchased The Maryland in 2011 and preserved it as affordable housing. Located in downtown Slid. apohs, The Maryland has 79 apartment homes for very low, low and moderate income levels. Paige Hall 69 apartments Aeon's purchase of- Paige Hall ensured that Ellie[ Park could retain ifs residential character as downtown Minneapolis extended its commercial space. It provides homes to those with very low incomes. Phillips ReDesign 89 apartments Pine Cliff Apartments 30 apatmena Aeon stepped into a failing Aeon acquired this dilapidated scattered -site development building and quickly began initiated by another nonprofit renovation to ensure it remained and worked for two years to affordable housing. Windows and ,,habilitate and refinance four, common spaces were added and dusters of houvng in the boundaries between public and Phillips neighborhood. put, ate spaces were better defined. Renaissance Box 70 apartments Aeon transformed this vacant, historic wazehonse in downtown St. Paul into a vibrant residential building. It provides high - quality, affordable apartment homes for individuals and households earning low to moderate incomes. Ripley Gardens 52 apartments a redevelopment of the historic Ripley Memorial Hospital, Ripley Gardens provides 52 rental units and eight town home ownership opportunities for households at vezy low, low and moderate income levels. The Roselle 67 apartment, This building in the Elliot Park Neighborhood wa, condemned and close to being demolished when Aeon purchased it Aeon renovated it to provide 67 one - bedroom and efficiency units. Sienna Green 170 apartments Located in Roseville, Sienna Goren is Aeon's secondsuburban development Formerly Imown as Hire Mar Apartments, Aeon established this property as a sustainable and repheable model for revitalising aging housing and building new. St. Bacrabas Apartments & The Summit 52 apartments aeon renovated this downtown Minocapolis hospital building to create 39 apartments for homeless youth and 13 for working adults. The Wellston¢ 49 apartments The Wellstone is the third pit., of the South Quari development, a partnership oFl f.pe Community and Aeon that helps transform the once blighted intersection into a vibrant place to live and work The Landing 54 apartments Located in Chaska, Minnesota, The Landing was opened in 2014 to provide affordable onc- bedroom apartments w seniors, age 62 and older. 901 North 3r °Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 • (612) 341 -3148 • FAX (612)341 -4208 The Rose 90 apartments (Opening Fall 2015) -Ihe Rose i, the fourth and final ph., of the South Quarter develop- ment By embracing the frnmework for the Living Building Challenge?tr, The Rose will transform the process of developing cost - effective, sruraio- able, affordable living. April 20, 2015 1050 Montreal Avenue St, Paul, MN 55110 651.291.1750 (P) 651.291.1003 (F) City of Mound Attn:Catherine Pausche 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, MN 55364 Re: Request for Qualifications, Indian Knoll Manor Dear Ms. Pausche, Common Bond Communities respectfully submits its proposal for the purchase and redevelopment of Indian Knoll Manor. Throughout our four -year tenure as the manager of the Indian Knoll Manor community, CommonBond has demonstrated its commitment to making Indian Knoll Manor a quality place for Mound residents to call home. The City of Mound's Request for Qualifications provides the opportunity for significant reinvestment and revitalization, which will not only benefit the residents of Indian Knoll Manor, but also the greater Mound community. Questions concerning this submission can be directed to: Cynthia Lee Associate Vice President 1080 Montreal Ave St. Paul, MN 55116 Cynthia.lee @common bond.org 651.290.6245 Sincerely, Ellen Higgins tJ Vice President of Business Development STABLE HOMES, STRONG FUTURES. VIRRANTCOWIN`Jidli ,$r egrr�+i � app„ nn +ity � f/ i native ��u , r ri .:ri�ir ri r ,n r ,law %o Neighboftr6- CHARTERED MEMBER CommonBond C O M M U N I T I E S Vision: CommonBond's team is proposing to replace the Indian Knoll property with a new well- designed, energy efficient and sustainable development. Our vision is to provide high - quality housing with enhanced amenities designed to improve the living environment for our residents and the surrounding community, at the same time leveraging a large new investment of private debt and equity in to this area of the city. The RAD program recognizes that some public housing communities are physically and functionally obsolete, and it offers the opportunity to use RAD as a revitalization tool, applying the rental assistance to newly -built redevelopments. Based on CommonBond's and Baker Tilly's feasibility and underwriting analysis, renovation of the Indian Knoll property poses significant challenges. The physical needs are extensive, and many functional limitations of the building itself are not correctable. In addition, the operating costs of the property are challenging in relation to the prescribed rent levels. The Indian Knoll site is well - positioned for revitalization and redevelopment. In alignment with the priorities of state and county funders, Indian Knoll Manor is located in a strategic, walkable location, in very close proximity to schools, parks, and retail/ grocery. It is located on the Metro Transit express route 677, with a bus stop immediately adjacent to the property. The city of Mound has a demonstrated need for affordable and workforce housing for both seniors and families. This new development will encompass a range of incomes. Affordability for the 50 RAD units will be preserved and maintained so that these households will pay no more than 30% of their income for rent, up to the maximum Contract Rents. The additional 10 to 12 new units in the new property will provide affordable `workforce' housing, subject to the <60% AMI rent and income levels of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. Comprehensive resident engagement is a vital component of our vision. CommonBond will work closely with our residents throughout the process. Although temporary relocation will be necessary, we will engage a very experienced relocation consultant, ProSource Technologies, to lead the relocation process following the requirements of HUD Notice H 2014- 09/PIH 2014 -17. As specified in this notice, RAD program rules prohibit the permanent involuntary relocation of residents as a result of conversion, and accessibility needs must be accommodated. In addition to receiving full Uniform Relocation Act (URA) relocation benefits to ensure that moving costs, replacement housing costs and utility disconnection and Page I reconnection costs are fully covered, residents will also receive individual assistance from ProSource, including a range of individual advisory services. CommonBond proposes to assemble private, state, local, county and federal sources for the new redevelopment. A key funding component is the LIHTC program, administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. HUD encourages applications which combine RAD with the LIHTC program, allowing RAD applications to go through two LIHTC application cycles in recognition of the competitive nature of this process. An additional key component is Tax Increment Financing (TIE) from the city. Currently the Indian Knoll property is publicly owned and pays only a small payment in lieu of taxes. Transfer to a new owner will result in assessment of full real estate taxes. TIF assistance would greatly help offset the cost of demolition and site work, plus help address the added operating cost of the real estate tax payment. Development Team Overview: CommonBond Communities, the Midwest's largest nonprofit provider of affordable housing with services, has served the region for over 40 years. We develop, own or manage over 5,700 affordable rental apartments and townhomes throughout 48 cities in Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Over 9,000 people - families, seniors, and people with disabilities and other barriers - call CommonBond home. More than 2,400 of these individuals are children. CommonBond is considered a national leader and innovator in the affordable housing and community development field. Our quality affordable housing, expert property management, and onsite Advantage Services for residents transform lives and provide long -term assets to the larger community. CommorrBond staff are uniquely focused on our residents and continually monitor, measure, and adjust our services to enhance the experience of living in a CommonBond community. Employee- driven core commitments ensure that our values are more than words, but a standard of conduct that reflects our appreciation of all the funders, partners, and community organizations that help us fulfill our mission to build stable homes, strong futures, and vibrant communities. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP (Baker Tilly) will join the development team as a consultant to provide expertise with the RAD program, the HUD disposition process, and development financing. Baker Tilly is a nationally recognized, full - service accounting and advisory firm whose specialized professionals connect with clients and their businesses through refreshing candor and clear industry insight. With approximately 2,500 employees across the United States, Baker Tilly is ranked as one of the 12 largest accounting and advisory firms in the country. Baker Tilly's RAD expertise is extensive. They serve as a sub - contractor to HUD on a national HUD contract to provide technical assistance to public housing authorities (PHAs) across the US for the RAD program. Baker Tilly assists PHAs in assessing their developments as it relates to RAD feasibility as well as presenting "RAD Basics" at several state and regional housing conferences. Unrelated to the HUD sub- contract, Baker Tilly is also a consultant on several PHA developments where the PHA is using RAD and LIHTC to convert its public housing units to long -term housing assistance contracts with the RAD program. f Page 2 Narrative Responses to RFQ Questions: 1.) Are the HRA goals workable or are modifications necessary to make the process more realistic? HRA Goals: a) Maintaining the property as a strong and vibrant affordable housing community b) Protecting the existing rental price calculation as required by HUD c) Demonstration that the equivalent of the market price will be reinvested into the property d) Maintaining Mound's residency priority CommonBond strongly agrees with the HRA's goals for Indian Knoll Manor. As a mission - driven, non - profit affordable housing developer, owner and manager, CommonBond is dedicated to creating and sustaining flourishing affordable housing communities like Indian Knoll and our nearby Westonka Estates. Throughout our tenure as the manager of the Indian Knoll Manor community, CommonBond has demonstrated its commitment to fostering stability and independence for our residents and continuing to be a strong partner within the community. As described herein, CommonBond's holistic approach to our properties results in comprehensive, long -term stability and viability. CommonBond's proposal will result in a stronger, more vibrant affordable housing community. The Section 8 rent structure will ensure affordability for a range of incomes. Residents will continue to pay no more than 30% of their income towards rent. The new development will reinvest significantly more funding in to the property than would renovation. Our proposed financing framework is attached. The proposed new redevelopment will result in reinvestment that is significantly higher than the market price for the property. Total development costs for this redevelopment are estimated to be $210,000 per unit, resulting in total reinvestment and leverage of over $12 million. CommonBond is strongly committed to maintaining and preserving the local residency priority 2.)Describe your overall organization, e.g. size of company, assets held, mission statement. Include your organizations management and ownership experience. COMMONBOND'S VISION: Every person has a dignified, affordable home that supports independence and advancement within a flourishing community. COMMONBOND'S MISSION: CommonBond builds stable homes, strong futures, and vibrant communities. Page 3 CommonBond Communities achieves its mission, in large part, through the work of its employees. CommonBond Communities employs 261 full -time and 65 part -time staff with the majority of the employees located at our housing performing day - today operations, including maintenance, leasing units and resolving resident issues. A smaller corporate staff is engaged in real estate development, property, asset management and compliance, fundraising, marketing, human resources, accounting and other administrative functions. Our Board of Directors consists of 26 individuals who are leaders in their fields and are passionate about CojmnonBond Communities and the residents we serve. We have attracted respected, high level leaders from the business community, as well as those who represent the diverse communities we serve. Individuals on the board bring a mix of skills and expertise in housing development, finance, strategic planning, legal, business development and information technology. We continually strive for gender balance and diversity. Nearly 800 volunteers provide more than 16,000 hours of volunteer support annually— equivalent to eight full time employees. More than 200 of those volunteers were provided by our corporate partners. Our dedicated volunteers provide assistance in a variety of ways — from regular direct contact with residents to helping with our fundraising events and property improvements. CommonBond's ownership and management portfolio consists of 108 properties with a total of 5,739 housing units, ranging from a seven -unit specialized community in Minneapolis to Skyline Tower in Saint Paul, a 504 unit high rise. Our housing communities include senior and family affordable housing communities, market -rate properties, properties serving persons with mental and physical disabilities, people living with AIDS, as well as an assisted living facility. Our 5,700 plus units are located in three states in the Upper Midwest: Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin. Attached are detailed listings of the properties in CommonBond's portfolio and a synopsis of CommonBond's 2014 results. 3.) Describe your organization's relevant experience in working with HUD Over half of CommonBond's 108 properties receive federal rental assistance from I-IUD, in the form of Project -Based Section 8 HAP contracts, Section 202 and 811 PRAC, and through the public housing program. CommonBond manages several Public Housing properties, including Indian Knoll and Parkview Villa in Columbia Heights, plus several scattered site Holtman units. Professional accreditation and designations for CommonBond's compliance team include AHM, TaCCs, COM -8, COM -42, COS -8, COS -42, C6P, STAR, Housing Choice Voucher Specialist, Public Housing Occupancy Specialist, and Public Housing Eligibility Specialist. The compliance team's experience consists of Section 8, tax credit (Section 42), tax- exempt bonds, HOME, Hollman (PHA) and many other local, state and federal affordable funding programs. The compliance team prepares and provides all reporting requirements to third parties as outlined in the funding documents for each property. CommonBond's Housing Development staff work closely with HUD Community Development and Multifamily staff and have a long - standing relationship with the Department. Housing Development staff have extensive experience with the HUD HOME, CDBG, SHP, ESG, Section 8, and FHA - insured programs. Page 4 Baker Tilly serves as a sub - contractor to HUD on a national HUD contract to provide technical assistance to public housing authorities (PHAs) across the US for the RAD program. The Louisiana Housing Corporation (LHC) recently selected Baker Tilly to provide consulting services to the state's Public Housing Authorities (PHA) seeking to convert their aging housing units to long -term project -based Section 8 rental assistance contracts under the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program. Baker Tilly was one of twelve development teams that LHC thoroughly vetted and properly procured on behalf of their more than 150 local PHAs. The selected development teams demonstrated successful track records of providing the required services to assist PHAs with the assessment, implementation, and compliance of the RAD Program. 4.) Describe why your organization views that they can be successful in working through the CHAP conversion process As described above, CommonBond and Baker Tilly have demonstrated ability and capacity to partner with the HRA to successfully work through the CHAP conversion process. Baker Tilly has extensive experience working with public housing authorities and RAD rules and regulations. We are positioned to be a strong and a viable partner with the HRA to navigate this process. 5.) To maintain the goal of subsidized housing, what programs and /or financing would you attempt to put into place? The RAD program provides a unique opportunity to lock in long -term rental assistance in the form of a long -term Section 8 HAP contract that, by law, must be renewed. Residents continue to pay 30% of their income towards the rent and they maintain the same basic rights as they possess in the public housing program. CommonBond proposes to assemble private, state, local, county and federal sources for the new redevelopment. A key funding component is the LIHTC program, administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. HUD encourages applications which combine RAD with the LIHTC program, allowing RAD applications to go through two LIHTC application cycles in recognition of the competitive nature of this process. An additional key component is Tax Increment Financing (TIF) from the city. Currently the Indian Knoll property is publicly owned and pays only a small payment in lieu of taxes. Transfer to a new owner will result in assessment of fill real estate taxes. TIF assistance would greatly help offset the cost of demolition and site work, plus help address the added operating cost of the real estate tax payment. The proposed redevelopment is closely aligned with the funding priorities for Hennepin County TOD /AHIF /HOME funds, LCDA funding, and MHFA Multifamily funding programs. Funding applications would be submitted starting in June 2015. CommonBond's experienced Housing Development staff will ensure that the new financing is underwritten efficiently and conservatively. Both CommonBond and Baker Tilly have extensive experience and track records successfully competing for these funding sources and executing the transactions. Page 5 Our track record demonstrates that CommonBond's team has the ability to successfully transact and finalize a sale in a timely manner. Recent similar transactions include CommonBond's Views at City Walk development in Woodbury and Towne Club in Rochester. CommonBond successfully worked with HUD funding and rental assistance for these properties, along with numerous layers of city, state, county and federal funds. 6.) Would you contract management or do it through your parent organization? CommonBond has managed the Indian Knoll property since 2011. We have established and maintained an excellent relationship with our residents, the HRA, and the surrounding community. CommonBond also owns and manages the nearby Westonka Estates senior property. CommonBond Housing would continue to provide property management for the new redevelopment. Since 1971 CommonBond has offered full- service property management and marketing services, corporate maintenance, centralized accounting, information services and compliance departments. CommonBond's property management department oversees all financial, Section 8 and 42 compliance, site and corporate maintenance, provides capital planning and construction management, and develops and implements marketing programs for the portfolio and fee managed properties. CommonBond uses the nationally recognized Yardi software system. The Yardi Voyager platform is a web -based system that integrates all financial reporting, property management and subsidy compliance. The Yardi "dashboard" clearly defines the workflow for the end user and provides real time information for both the regional and site staff. 7.) Would you add any services to what exists or continue as is? CommonBond will bring its Advantage Services programming to the property, designed to promote resident advancement, stability, and independence, and to increase community engagement. We offer an array of on -site programs and services customized to increase stability and financial independence, with programs that address healthy living, employment, and educational achievement. Page 6 CommonBond's core Advantage Services model focuses on stability and independence, and community building and engagement. Core services include health and wellness events, a computer lab, eviction prevention, and an active resident association. Our regional Service Coordinator will provide coaching, training, resource education and support to the site's Property Manager to support resident stability and independence. Our proposed new housing community will serve both seniors and individuals with physical disabilities. The new development will be designed using universal design criteria to ensure that people of all ages and abilities are able to live independently for as long as possible. Within this environment, CommonBond's resident services will strengthen and sustain long -term resident self - sufficiency. 8.)The HRA desires to have parties submit a proposal regarding purchase price /amount that will be reinvested in to the property. It is understood that this pricing proposal will be general in nature, and will serve only as a starting point for negotiations since the type of programs, interest rates, HUD approval requirements, HRA goals, etc. may all have an impact on the final agreement. Our proposed financing framework is attached. The proposed new redevelopment will result in reinvestment that is significantly higher than the market price for the property. Total development costs for this redevelopment are estimated to be $210,000 per unit, resulting in total reinvestment and leverage of over $12 million. We have prepared a detailed preliminary financial analysis based on historical operating performance and industry standards. We have identified a number of available capital funding sources in the form of equity and deferred loans which will support this redevelopment scenario. Because the RAD rent levels are significantly lower than comparable market rents in the area, there is no cash flow to support long -tern amortizing debt. Page 7 Attachments: 1. Financial Proposal Framework 2. Preliminary Design Concept 3. 2014 CommonBond Results 4. CommonBond Real Estate Portfolio 5. Baker Tilly Resume Page 8 First Mortgage $ - - MHFA, LIIIA $ 1,620,000 26,557 Hennepin County HOMEfAHIF/TOD $ 880,000 14,426 City TIF $ 360,000 5,902 LCDAITOD $ 1,060,000 17,377 Deferred Developer Fee $ 654,458 10,729 Limited Partner Equity - LIHTC $ 8,320,587 136,403 211,394 (0) Construction Costs $ 9,650,000 $ 158,19' 7 Professional Fees (Construction- Rclated) $ 464,000 $ 7, 60 Construction Interim Costs $ 436,000 $ 7,148 Permanent Financing $ 92,500 $ 1,516 Soft Costs $ 148,000 $ 2,426 Syndication Cost $ 42,000 $ 689 Fees $ 1,650,000 $ 27,049 Legal $ 98,500 $ 1,615 Reserves $ 314,045 $ 5,148 $ 211,394 OF 0 I QE l7t) a ZW NJ go MF (D E K a< 0 0 am emu � \} ED ` \ (D- E/ o\ (D n a emu z� � \ a /C yJ N N N E ^ ^0 W O O O 6 O W CJ M M M N I� WOW L r n n n Q N N A SO L N � O N n O �- 0 U N O N O a cn II�^ o � m � d v Y • E r 'm y m m E E E m a Q.Q Q Q r a o o M / >, .y ry p o 6 0 CommonBond is a nationally- recognized leader and innovator in the affordable housing industry. The organization has demonstrated that quality affordable housing combined with on -site services can transform lives and communities. III I. ��'�'" 1.. M11,60 € t k dU �' +mot Y, w CommonBond'sAdvantage Services supports resident stability, advancement, and independence with resources from homework help, to eviction prevention, to arranging home delivered meals. This support allows residents to imagine and achieve goals, creates opportunity for community engagement within housing sites and broader communities, and improves financial performance of properties. 1 A A l Raised $7.3 million in total gifts and funding Recognized as a TOP 50 affordable housing developer organization implemented a new three -year strategic plan I rived a 2014 Excellence Award from MN Council of Nonprofits Hired the third president & CEO in the organization's 43 -year history ce 4NOI, Opened four new developments, three of which are senior properties Broke ground on a historic housing development for homeless veterans at Fort Snelling 2111 81 11 201 Poll W 111", w`��r eI... CommonBond'sAdvantage Services supports resident stability, advancement, and independence with resources from homework help, to eviction prevention, to arranging home delivered meals. This support allows residents to imagine and achieve goals, creates opportunity for community engagement within housing sites and broader communities, and improves financial performance of properties. 1 A A l Raised $7.3 million in total gifts and funding Recognized as a TOP 50 affordable housing developer organization implemented a new three -year strategic plan I rived a 2014 Excellence Award from MN Council of Nonprofits Hired the third president & CEO in the organization's 43 -year history ce 4NOI, Opened four new developments, three of which are senior properties Broke ground on a historic housing development for homeless veterans at Fort Snelling Recently Completed CommonSond Properties: Views at City Walk, Woodbury MN Exterior . . Community Room Towne Club Senior, Rochester MN Exterior Game Room Commons I \( !/ \( t \ \\ \ .< : \ m , g.rgg2 ,en : \( !/ \( - � 3 L L z L 1. 1 L K z z I z I z z z z z - x E I,-, lihi ilsY } 1 -4 �i } \t ��11 \ 111 t. f1 1�'1 Y1a1. '1 Sll Si jl x to t t at ltyix bl 'ill i 1 1 \V a1 n i t 1 �Lby 3nhg r i ytvut. -11 b ast v i LLM , s L t, \3u 5 b }li�i d it `x b t xy�4 5 � 1�1 Ji�ai b d S \i, ?tat t y lt} LI �u} SY .. t Diu: ?a l,t ii a W Y F z x� �v o O pi P K M m n P =N �`n j / \ \ \ \ ( About Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP (Baker Tilly) is a nationally recognized, full - service accounting and advisory firm whose specialized professionals connect with clients and their businesses through refreshing candor and clear industry insight. With approximately 2,500 employees across the United States, Baker Tilly is ranked as one of the 12 largest accounting and advisory firms in the country. Headquartered in Chicago, Baker Tilly is an independent member of Baker Tilly International, a worldwide network of independent accounting and business advisory firms in 137 countries, with 27,000 professionals. The combined worldwide revenue of independent member firms is $3.4 billion. As a result of our managed growth through the years we have strengthened our client relationships, expanded our portfolio of services, and advanced our position as an industry leader. Baker Tilly balances dynamic growth with a deep commitment to operating with absolute integrity and a belief in the value of trusted relationships. The down -to -earth style that built the firm remains evident today in a collaborative, client - focused approach. Our values Throughout our relationship with you, we will be guided by our firm's core values — principles that guide our behaviors and choices and help us strive for excellence in everything we do. Integrity We do the right thing, for the right reason, every day. We have high expectations for our firm and its future — expectations that only can be realized by taking the high road. Honesty, trust, and the fulfillment of promises are paramount to our success. Passion Everything matters. We listen to our clients, display an enthusiastic attitude, experience genuine satisfaction from working together to serve clients, and take great pride from a job well done. We put forth our best effort every day for the betterment of our clients, our people, and our firm. Stewardship We invest for the future with the intention of leaving everything better. Our clients will be more successful, our people will be more fulfilled, our communities will be enriched, and our firm will leave a proud legacy. Page 1 1 t Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Real estate expertise Our construction and real estate team includes 54 partners within the more than 350 professionals focused on the construction and real estate industry. As a stand -alone practice, the team would place in the 50 largest accounting firms in the US. Our real estate team understands the intricacies of the real estate and affordable housing industries. More than 4,000 clients across the country rely on our industry specialists to meet their strategic and operational needs. Our services are provided by professionals who are fully immersed in audit and tax, project accounting, regulatory compliance, real estate transactions, and opportunity development. They sit on national and state boards and have in -depth knowledge of industry trends and best practices. manager, development consultant, and financial advisor, and they have assisted clients on specialized projects such as developer evaluation and selection, social services planning, relocation, demolition, disposition, funding applications, revitalization planning, asset management, construction management, financial leveraging, and capital fund financing. Our affordable housing team provides the core services shown in the illustration above. Page 1 2 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Our professionals also participate in related industry associations such as: Affordable Housing Association of Certified Public Accountants The Affordable Housing Tax Credit Coalition Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Tax Credit Committee National Leased Housing Association c National and Midwest Affordable Housing Management Association National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials Minnesota Multi Housing Association > National Council of Housing Market Analysis Industry specialization Specialized services for the affordable housing industry are provided by professionals who understand the complexity of this multi- faceted industry. We are proud to offer a team of specialists who are fully immersed in affordable housing, who sit on national and state boards, and have in -depth knowledge of the trends and intricacies of the industry. Whether you are interested in entering into an affordable property transaction, need assistance with conversion or repositioning /disposition of an existing portfolio, or are involved in reviewing or restructuring your compliance programs, Baker Tilly can help. Solutions beyond the basics One of the biggest challenges facing developers and investors is choosing the next opportunity— visualizing the potential of various affordable housing scenarios once a property or opportunity presents itself. Analyzing the options, overcoming barriers, and uncovering resources are all integral parts of making a development successful. Just as important is early identification of issues that will place significant holds on the development process. How can you more easily access information about federal and state resources? Where can you tap into expertise on multiple resources such as Section 42 and Historic Credits, Tax Exempt Bonds, HOME funds, and individual state resources? Our specialists have the answers to help you move quickly as opportunities arise. Expertise in multiple areas More than 4,400 contractors, real estate operators, developers, and investors across North America trust Baker Tilly to support their business in a multitude of areas, including accounting, and tax services. Our service to the construction and real estate industries extends to helping businesses develop employee compensation and benefit packages, procure capital, manage their materials, analyze their billing process and business performance, and monitor compliance and reporting. Tailored to your needs You can depend on the skills, knowledge, and service- orientation of our professionals. A dedicated team is ready to assist you with any part of the process, whether you need some answers for planning, capital for restructuring, or assistance to comply with federal and state requirements. Page 1 3 171 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, Ll Baker Tilly's RAD experience Baker Tilly provides consulting and annual audit and tax services for affordable housing clients throughout the United States. Our clients include both not - for - profit and for -profit owners and developers whose projects range in size from one property to more than fifty properties. We also consult regarding HUD's Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program. Baker Tilly is known throughout the United States for its work in assisting both public and private sector entities identify and secure sources of funding, and facilitate public /private partnerships relative to key development and affordable housing initiatives. In the past 24 months, the Baker Tilly team has participated in financial closings that have funded more than 85 projects, encompassing more than 7,800 units of affordable housing including but not limited to family, senior, and supportive housing units, $1.25 billion in total development costs, and $670 million of investor equity. In addition, Baker Tilly's RAID expertise is impressive. We serve as a sub - contractor to HUD on a national HUD contract to provide technical assistance to public housing authorities (PHAs) across the US for the RAID program. Baker tilly assists PHAs in assessing their developments as it relates to RAID feasibility as well as presenting 'RAD Basics" at several state and regional housing conferences. Unrelated to the HUD sub- contract, Baker Tilly is also a consultant on several PHA developments where the PHA is using RAD and LIHTC to convert its public housing units to long -term housing assistance contracts with the RAD program. Page 1 4 0 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Donald N. Bernards, CPA Partner Ten Terrace Court, Madison WI 53718 608 240 2643 tel 1 608 249 8532 fax donaid.bernards@bakertilly.com Donald Bernards, partner in the real estate group with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, has been active in many aspects of affordable housing since 1999. He is well - versed in structuring affordable housing transactions, including the tax issues. Don is adept at creating a checklist of major issues for each project that can put a deal at risk. Immersed in the affordable housing practice, Don has a wide range of experience with projects, owners, and investors and has built a wide network of contacts within the field. His enthusiasm and passion for the industry are infectious. "It's not just about numbers," he says, "it's about the end product and growing capacity." �- Part of HUD technical assistance team providing RAID technical assistance nationwide to housing authorities through both one -on -one training as well as presenting at educational conferences and seminars • Consults on various 4% and 9% deals that have a RAID award and are working toward closing • Manages a portfolio of clients with the affordable housing industry utilizing various programs including Section 42, Section 8, Section 236, and Section 515 Provides financial modeling for acquisition /rehabilitation and new construction tax credit deals Assists in the preparation of Low - Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) applications and applications for soft sources of financing, including HOME, Affordable Housing Program (AHP), and Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Assists with obtaining debt for various types of affordable housing, including taxable and various tax - exempt debt totaling more than $350 million over the past five years Determines optimal historical tax credit transaction structure, works with attorneys to ensure structure abides by safe harbor guidelines, and advises on maximizing qualified rehabilitation expenditures (QREs) Provides assistance with portfolio acquisition and disposition strategies and implementation In the past five years, assisted in raising and closing more than $500 million in equity for LIHTC, historic tax credit, and New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) projects Assisted a faith -based not - for - profit, new to affordable housing, in creating and closing deals; as a result of experience and Don's training and support, they are now closing their twelfth deal and are sought after by investors and lenders Page 1 5 t Donald Bernards, page 2 Specific experience (cont.) As an NMTC consultant, provides underwriting support, tax benefit analysis, and compliance consulting Reviews budgets and performs financial analysis on assisted living projects Assists with cost segregation studies for affordable housing properties Performs internal audit procedures for an owner's portfolio of affordable housing, which includes reviewing internal controls Involved in many tax aspects of a project, from transaction structuring to planning and preparation Reviews 10% tests and cost certifications Wisconsin Institute of Certified Public Accountants (WICPA) American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) American Bar Association — Member, Forum on Affordable Housing & Community Development Law; also, Tax Credits and Equity Financing Committee Member of National American Indian Housing Council Tax Credit Advisory Board Member for State HFA Frequent speaker at regional and national conferences on affordable housing issues Luke House community meal program lead University of Wisconsin — Madison Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting Page 1 6 4 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Bill Boerigter Senior Manager Ten Terrace Court, Madison Wl 53718 608 240 2602 tel ( 608 249 8532 fax bill.boerigter@bakertilly.com Bill Boerigter, senior manager with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, joined the firm's real estate transaction services team in 2014 after serving as Manager of LIHTC Allocation, Multifamily Lending and Asset Management with the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA). He provides advisory services on real estate transactions that typically involve tax incentives such as the Low- Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), tax - exempt bonds, or others. Services include reviewing financial feasibility of transactions, performing financial structuring and modeling, preparing and consulting on various tax credit and soft funding applications, securing equity and debt, reviewing relevant legal documents, and providing technical or strategic consultation. • - •- Specializes in affordable housing development services including assistance with obtaining and structuring funding sources such as LIHTC, tax - exempt bonds, HOME, Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB), and other public and private resources > Completes financial modeling and structuring services for projects involving LIHTC, tax - exempt bonds, and Historic Tax Credits (HTC) among others Provides consultation on applications for 9% LIHTC, tax - exempt bonds, and soft financing sources (e.g., HOME Funds, Federal Home Loan Bank AHP Funds) Assists in securing equity for LIHTC projects through networking with investors, reviewing letters of intent, and negotiating agreement terms Experience in multiple redevelopment projects with various mixed - finance programs Consults on various 4% and 9% LIHTC transactions that are currently working through the closing process Experienced in Section 8 preservation, and preservation of other federally subsidized housing, tax - exempt bond financing, and tax credit preservation, monitoring, and compliance At WHEDA, Bill managed all phases of multifamily loan origination and LIHTC allocation for WHEDA 2005 to 2014; record lending levels hit $104 million in 2006, $111 million in 2007, and $216 million in 2012; he also managed the State of Wisconsin LIHTC allocation process ($120 million annually) and was responsible for policy development for Wisconsin's Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) Experienced in all areas of multifamily real estate development Page 1 7 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Bill Boerigter, page 2 • M 7= National Council of State Housing Agencies National, state, and local speaker on affordable housing and LIHTC development and preservation ♦ t University of Texas — Austin Bachelor of Business Administration University of Notre Dame Certificate in Leadership Marquette University Certificate in Management and Leadership University of Wisconsin Real Estate Executive Certificate Page 1 8 t Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Josie Kotsioris Senior Manager 205 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago IL 60601 312 729 8177 tel 1312 729 8199 fax josie.kotsioris@bakertilly.com Josie Kotsioris, a senior manager with the affordable housing and community development services team at Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, has been with the firm since 2007. She leads the Chicago team and works with a broad array of clients and staff, serving communities nationwide. Josie focuses on a national portfolio of clients including not - for - profits, local governments, public housing authorities, developers, investors, and community -based lenders. Specializes in affordable housing development services including assistance with obtaining and structuring funding sources such as Low - Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), HOME, Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP), Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLB), Finance Adjustment Factor (FAF), and other public and private resources Accomplished in tax credit consulting, allocation, and application support and structuring Provides specialized niche services for NSP recipients Experienced in administration of HOME program, CDBG, Section 8 preservation, and preservation of other federally subsidized housing, tax - exempt bond financing, and tax credit preservation, monitoring, and compliance Provides assistance in strategic planning and for public housing agencies and complicated multi -phase and mixed -use development Assists clients with obtaining and negotiating financial commitments with respect to credit syndication and debt placement Performs technical assistance and compliance services for funding sources, including the NSP, LIHTC, and NMTC compliance Frequent speaker and trainer, involved in many national industry groups and will work with clients on structuring or mentoring Assists in the development and execution of joint venture relationships, particularly in public /private and not - for - profit based joint ventures Is a principal in the development of NMTC applications Provides support in the development of NMTC community outreach plans and development support Provides NMTC compliance support for Community Development Entities (CDEs) and Qualified Active Low - Income Community Businesses (QALICBs) t Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Josie Kotsioris, page 2 • a National Council of State Housing Agencies Institute for Responsible Housing Preservation New Markets Tax Credit GO Zone Working Group National Housing & Rehabilitation Association Housing Advisory Group (HAG) National Leased Housing Association — Board Member Community Development Officer for the Illinois Valued Advisor Fund (IVAF) Advisory Board Member for the Urban Research Park, CDE Illinois Housing Council National, state, and local speaker on affordable housing and LIHTC development and preservation a Loyola University— Chicago Bachelor of Business Administration in Economics Housing Development Finance Professional Certification Certified Credit Compliance Professional HUD Certified MAP Underwriter HUD Certified NSP Team Leader Page 1 10 IV, Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Edgar Flagg Manager 205 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago IL 60601 312 733 8341 tel j fax 312 729 8199 edgarflagg@bakertilly.com Edgar Flagg, manager with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, has been with the firm since 2011. He has ten years of commercial real estate management and development experience working for private and public real estate companies involved in affordable housing, retail, office, and mixed -use real estate projects. > Development of more than 450 new mixed - income, mixed - finance rental units with HOPE Vi, HUD, Low - Income Tax Credit Equity, FHLB, HOME, TIF, and other equity and debt sources Experience working with public housing agencies, toward the successful development of new mixed - income housing Master planning assistance for public housing agencies Development project budgeting, scheduling, and analysis of affordable and retail projects Experience providing construction project management for new construction and rehabilitation of residential, retail, and office properties Experience in providing design review, value engineering, and cost estimating to developers and public agencies Construction project management of public infrastructure and utility improvements Financial modeling for acquisition /rehabilitation and new construction tax deals Experience with loan and tax credit equity financing, due diligence, and real estate closings Experience coordinating Section 3, MBEMlBE, and other programs that involve local businesses, unions, and community groups in redevelopment projects t a Roosevelt University Master Business Administration University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Bachelors of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning Page 1 11 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Veronica Gonzalez Manager 205 N. Michigan Ave., Chicago IL 60601 312 729 8025 j fax 312 729 8199 veronica.gonzalez@bakertilly.com Veronica Gonzalez, manager with the affordable housing and community development services team at Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, joined the firm in 2013. She has fifteen years of experience managing complex, multifamily, mixed -use, mixed - finance development projects for public housing authorities, municipalities, and private affordable housing developers. f -.a. Experience with structuring and closing affordable housing developments financed through the issuance of tax exempt bonds Underwrote $113 million of numerous Chicago Housing Authority — financed affordable housing projects Provides assistance to clients with obtaining funding sources such as Low - Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), HOME, CDBG, FHLB, and other public and private sources Serves numerous clients on acquisition and redevelopment projects, including development and review of pro formas and the preparation of project cash flows Experienced in cash flow analysis, financial modeling and forecasting, project budgeting, and financial due diligence Assists clients Wth obtaining and negotiating financial commitments with respect to tax credit syndication and debt placement Experience leading bilingual /bicultural community outreach meetings to obtain consensus on redevelopment plans utilizing input on building design, income mix, housing tenure, project density and resident support services Thorough knowledge of entitlement process, due diligence, and market opportunity assessments to ensure financing solicitations are successful +♦ t Illinois Housing Council • National Association of Housing Rehabilitation Officials • Urban Land Institute University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Master of Urban Planning University of Chicago Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy Studies Page 1 12 t Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP Charlena C. Brown, CPA Manager Ten Terrace Court, Madison WI 53718 608 240 2468 tel l fax 608 249 8532 chariena.brown@bakertilly.com Charlena Brown, manager with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, joined the firm in 2007 and has experience providing auditing, accounting, and consulting services. She specializes in real estate transaction services and is involved in various aspects of real estate projects. Her responsibilities include reviewing feasibility and modeling the financial structure, and assisting with raising equity. • • Provides consulting on various 4 % and 9% deals that have a US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) award and are working toward closing Provides consulting on US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Projects Provides financial modeling for acquisition /rehabilitation and new construction Low - Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) deals and Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits(HRTC) Assists with tax - exempt bond transactions, LIHTC applications, and applications for other soft financing including but not limited to HOME, AHP, and CDBG Assists in raising equity for LIHTC and historic tax credit projects Assists with tracking and monitoring development and construction budgets r Assists in coordinating and executing due diligence for prospective commercial, mixed -use, and residential developments Conducts research on transaction - related regulatory and policy issues Experienced in financial auditing and compiling of financial statements American Institute of Certified Public Accountants(AICPA) Wisconsin Institute of Certified Public Accountants (WICPA) National Association of Black Accountants (NASA) > Madison College Accounting Advisory Board Edgewood College (Madison, Wisconsin) Bachelor of Science in Accounting Page 1 13 r M ITT& 0 1 ral= T1 0 ;lII/' MON14 '4tj David S. Haviland Manager 608 240 2358 tel l fax 608 249 8532 david.haviland @bakertilly.com David Haviland, manager with Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, has been with the firm since 2009 and has been conducting real estate market research and consulting services since 2001. David provides effective and practical solutions for property owners, tenants, mortgage lenders, public officials, and others involved in all aspects of the real estate process. His strong background in finance and the real estate industry provides for a sound, thorough evaluation of real estate situations. Specializes in a variety of real estate advisory services to clients throughout the Midwest including market rate and Section 42 tax credits, and senior and multifamily housing market feasibility studies Assisted in developing and financing of various housing types including multifamily and single family Has written more than 700 market studies and conducts in excess of twenty -five market feasibility studies at any given time Gained extensive real estate development experience as a project manager overseeing several mixed -use developments in Dane County for a local commercial real estate developer > Worked with MONY Realty Capital assisting with the internal underwriting and due diligence process of more than $200 million in debt Industry involvement University of Wisconsin Real Estate Alumni Association National Council of Housing Market Analysts (NCHMA) University of Wisconsin— Madison Bachelor of Business Administration in Real Estate and Urban Land Economics and Finance, Investment, and Banking Page 1 14 Appendix B: Required forms Page 1 15