The URL can be used to link to this page

2013-11-12 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City ifhl cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fos G MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOV 12, 2013 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS "Consent A¢endn: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be reinoved fhone the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Open meeting 2, Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 2355 -2389 *B. Approve minutes: Oct 22, 2013 regular meeting 2390 -2392 *C. Approve Pay Request No. 6 from GHM Asphalt Corporation, in the amount 2393 -2394 of $382,391.21, for the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project, City Project No. PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 *D. Approve Pay Request No. 2 from Minger Construction, Inc, in the amount 2395 -2396 of $211,395.38, for the 2013 Lift Station Improvement Project, City Project No. PW -13 -03 *E. Resolution Approving Variance and Expansion Permit for 4431 Lamberton 2397 -2444 Road — PC Case No. 13 -25 and 13 -26 F. Approve Resolution Approving Landscaping Plan Security Release Request 2445 -2450 from Woodlyn, LLC 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Public Hearings A. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, with Planning Commission 2451 -2494 Recommendation - Planning Case No. 13 -28 Consider application to vacate streets within the Minnesota Summer Baptist Assembly original plat Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen PC recommendation: Approval subject to conditions Requested action: Action on Resolution Vacating Streets within Minnesota Summer Baptist Assembly Original Plat PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. B. Dan Faulkner, representing Bolton & Menk Engineering, requesting action 2495 on Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans for 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wail Improvement Project— Three Points Boulevard 7. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, with Planning Commission 2496 -2530 Recommendation - Planning Case No. 13 -29 Consideration/action on Variance Application for 1748 Finch Lane Applicant: Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders, on behalf of owner Jeffrey Jesberg PC recommendation: Approval subject to conditions Requested action: Action on Resolution Approving Variance for Property at 1748 Finch Lane 8. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Planning Commission — Oct 1 & 15, 2013 2531 -2537 C. Reports: Centennial Building Dedication — Oct 7, 2013 2538 Harbor Wine & Spirits — Oct & YTD 2539 -2540 Hennepin County Property Tax Comparison 2541 -2545 D. Correspondence: Adj ourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: nnww. citvtif n - ,LAcorn. • • • YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2013 OCT13 -ELAN $ 3,653.63 2013 PSTGNEWSLETR $ 827.38 2013 1024CITYMAN $ 11,902.87 2013 GAMETIME $ 2,500.00 2013 1105CITYMAN $ 28,578.88 2013 0913KENGRAV $ 3,678.00 2013 111213CITY $ 226,210.93 2013 111213CITY2 $ 32,383.36 2013 111213HWS $ 129,913.58 2013 10- 13TV -CQ $ 776.24 CLAIMS IFTAL , 440,424.8- -1355- S: \FINANCE DEPT \AP \CITY COUNCIL CLAIMS LISTING 2013.xisx 11 -12 -13 j \ �TY OF MOUND Batch Name OCT13 -ELAN Payment Refer 10 ELAN CREDIT CARD Payments Current Period: October 2013 Computer Dollar Amt Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10/2312013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10123/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 10232013 10/2312013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 10232013 10123/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999430 Miscellaneous Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 $3,653.63 Posted Ck# 053488E 11/5/2013 11/08/13 8'.42 AM Page 1 DISPLAYS2GO- LITERATURE DISPLAY, $491.71 DIRECTIONAL ARROWS- NEW CITY HALL Project CH2013 LODGING - DULUTH R. HANSON -AWWA $319.77 CONF. 9 -10 TO 9 -13 -13 LODGING DULUTH L. GIESE & B. BERENT- $319.77 AW WA CONF. 9 -10 TO 9 -13 -13 FUEL DULUTH CANAL PARK ICO -AWWA $42.69 CONF 9 -10 TO 9 -13 -13 FUEL HINKLEY LITTLE STORE -AWWA CONF $109.43 9 -10 TO 9 -13 -13 LODGING DEPOSIT- G. PEDERSON $164.00 VOLUNTEER CHIEF OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM - CLEARWATER FL 11 -7 THRU 11 -10 -13 U OF M WRITING WORKSHOP C. MOORE 11- $235.00 20 -13 4 SMOKERS OASIS NEW CITY HALL $530.67 Project CH2013 AMAZON- TRAINING VIDEO TRANSFER TO $69.00 DVD -FIRE DEPT LETTER- COPY PAPER- HWS $13.40 OUR DEISGNS ACCOUNT FEE- CHALLENGE $14.99 COINS FIRE DEPT EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION MTG TREATS DO $35.39 9 -16 -13 ARROWOOD RESORT -FIN OFFICER $115.43 CONFERENCE 9 -18 -13 C. PAUSCHE GAS CITY CAR- FINANCE OFFICER $40.35 CONFERENCE ALEXANDRIA 9 -18 -13 C. PAUSCHE BRIN NW GLASS -FRONT OFFICE WINDOW $272.88 MODIFICATION NEW CITY HALL Project CH2013 BRIN NW GLASS -FRONT OFFICE WINDOW $207.57 MODIFICATION NEW CITY HALL Project CH2013 2356- MOUND, MN 11/08/138:42 AM Page 2 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies BATTERIES PLUS - BATTERY FOR SUCTION $27.78 MACHINE FIRE DEPT Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -434 Conference & Training REG FEE- VOLUNTEER CHIEF OFFICERS Pre - Written Check $3,653.63 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $3,653.63 -2357- $375.00 $127.00 $141.80 $3,653.63 SYMPOSIUM -G. PEDERSON -FL 11 -7 THRU 11 -10 -13 Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies BRIN NW GLASS -FIRE SVC AREA MAP FRAMING Invoice 10232013 10/2312013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous NORTHERN TOOL -BOOT & SHOE BRUSH - NEW CITY HALL Invoice 10232013 10/23/2013 Project CH2013 Transaction Date 11/512013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $13.40 602 SEWER FUND $1,026.66 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $777.77 101 GENERAL FUND $1,835.80 $3,653.63 Pre - Written Check $3,653.63 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $3,653.63 -2357- $375.00 $127.00 $141.80 $3,653.63 MOUND, MN 10/24/134:36 PM Page 1 Payments caY o K'how_ND Current Period: October 2013 Batch Name PSTGNEWSLETR User Dollar Amt $827.38 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $827.38 Refer 1 POSTMASTER Cash Payment E 101 - 41110 -322 Postage Invoice 10242013 10/24/2013 Transaction Date 10/24/2013 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND $0.00 In Balance CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER POSTAGE $827.38 FALL 2013 8 PGS 5755 PCS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $827.38 10100 Wells Fargo $827.38 $827.38 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $827.38 Total $827.38 -2358- Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $11,902.87 Total $11,902.87 2359- MOUND, MN 10/24/13 1:28 PM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2013 Batch Name 1024CITYMAN User Dollar Amt $11,902.87 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $11,902.87 $0.00 In Balance Refer 2 ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING EN_FOR _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -438 Licenses and Taxes 2014 RETAILERS BUYERS CARD $20.00 Invoice 10242013 10/24/2013 Transaction Date 10/24/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.00 Refer 3 DESIGNERS OUTLOOK, LLC _ Cash Payment E 101 -49999 -430 Miscellaneous INTERIOR SIGNAGE NEW CITY HALL BLDG- $1,496.44 BOLTS, FRAMES- INSTALLATION Invoice 5486 10/9/2013 Project CH2013 Transaction Date 10/24/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,496.44 Refer 1 MINNESOTA DEPT OF COMMERC _ _ Cash Payment G 101 -23051 448 Denbigh #05 -27 Johnson UNCLAIMED PROPERTY- B. JOHNSON- $326.07 UNCASHED CHECK #30380 12 -30 -08 Invoice 10242013 10/24/2013 Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu UNCLAIMED PROPERTY- G. CATER- $30.36 UNCASHED CHECK #33503 11 -25 -09 Invoice 10242013 10/24/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -22803 Police Reserves UNCLAIMED PROPERTY -J. LEE UNCASHED $30.00 CHECK #34580 3 -24 -10 Invoice 10242013 10124/2013 Transaction Date 10/24/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $386.43 Refer 4 WOODLYN, LLC _ Cash Payment G 101 -23007 Erosion Control Escrow REFUND EROSION CONTROL ESCROW- $10,000.00 WOODLYN, LLC GRADING PLAN SECURITY Invoice 10242013 10/10/2013 Transaction Date 10/24/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,000.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $11,852.51 601 WATER FUND $30.36 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $20.00 $11,902.87 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $11,902.87 Total $11,902.87 2359- Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,500.00 Total $2,500.00 -2360- MOUND, MN 10/24/1311:57 AM r Page 1 \ Payments €TY OF MOUND Current Period: October 2013 Batch Name GAMETIME User Dollar Amt $2,500.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $2,500.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 GAMETIME _ Cash Payment E 101- 45220 -525 Other Capital Improveme DEPOSIT PRIMETIME PLAY STRUCTURE- $2,500.00 2013 GRANT PROGRAM GAMETIME Invoice 8819 10/16/2013 Transaction Date 1012112013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,500.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,500.00 Total $2,500.00 -2360- Batch Name 1105CITYMAN Payment Computer Dollar Amt $28,578.88 Posted Refer 1 BALBOA_CE_NTER LIMITED PARTN Ck# 044747 1115/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23187 5300 Shoreline #08 -03 Balbo ESCROW REFUND - PARCEL SPLIT BALBOA- $959.50 $315.42 METRO STORAGE- PC #08 -03 5000 11 -20 -13 Invoice 4076471 SHORELINE DR Invoice 11052013 1114/2013 E 101- 41910 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 10 -20 -13 THRU Transaction Date 1114/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .... $959.50 Refer 10 CORAZZO, PAUL ,,., a.,� ., ..,.._ .. ....- Ck# 044748 11/5/2013 .... Cash Payment E 401 - 43113 -300 Professional Srvs PERM EASEMENT FIRE HYDRANT -4638 $23.80 $157.72 MANCHESTER- PIN 13 -01 P. CORAZZO 11 -20 -13 Invoice 11052013 7/18/2013 Project PW1301 10/20/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.80 Refer 6 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Ck# 044749 11/5/2013 11 GOGGINS, ROBERT Ck# 044750 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 10 -20 -13 THRU $157.72 11 -20 -13 Invoice 4076471 10/20/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 10 -20 -13 THRU $315.42 11 -20 -13 Invoice 4076471 10/20/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 10 -20 -13 THRU $157.72 11 -20 -13 Invoice 4076471 10/2012013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells NETWORK ETHERNETSVC 10 -20 -13 THRU $157.72 11 -20 -13 Invoice 4076471 10/20/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $788.58 Refer 11 GOGGINS, ROBERT Ck# 044750 11/5/2013 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY CREDIT -4650 SUFFOLK RD- $474.43 R. GOGGINS Invoice 11052013 11/412013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $474.43 Refer 13 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Ck# 044751 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -202 Duplicating and copying FINANCE COPIER OVERAGE CHARGE B &W $7.27 7 -20 -13 THRU 10 -19 -13 Invoice 1640427 10/10/2013 Transaction Date "1 -. 11/5/2013 Due 0 1-1-111-.— 1.11,11,1.m„ ,l. 11 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7.27 ... Refer _ — „_1—„ 11-1-11,11,11, ... — —1-11,11, 7 MNSPECT k# 044752 11/512013 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -308 Building Inspection Fees SEPT 2013 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES $22,291.97 Invoice 6153 9/30/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments SEPT 2013 - ELECTRICAL STATE - $155.00 SURCHARGE FEE CREDIT Invoice 6153 9130/2013 Cash Payment R 101- 42000 -32220 Electrical Permit Fee SEPT 2013 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION - $431.00 PERMIT FEE CREDITS Invoice 6153 9/30/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $21,705.97 Refer - 2 MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVEL Ck# 0447' )13 - 2361= MOUND, MN 11/05/139:56 AM — Page 2 Payments :r`f OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 680 -49800 -440 Other Contractual Servic HRA LANDSCAPE SVC PD BY CITY 8 -27 -31 - $305.49 Invoice 10052013 10/2412013 Cash Payment R 680- 49800 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu HRA LMCIT REIMS PD TO CITY -ELEV FIRE 6- $2,593.00 10 -13 Invoice 10052013 10/2412013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,287.51 Refer 3 PEDERSON, GREG Ck #044754 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -434 Conference & Training TRAVEL ADVANCE- G. PEDERSON VCOS $250.00 CHIEFS CONF FL 11 -07 TO 11 -09 -13 Invoice 11052013 11/4/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 Refer 12 SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MGMT Ck# 044755 111512013 Cash Payment G 101 -22801 Deposits /Escrow REFUND OVERPYMT FORCED MOW -4861 HANOVER RD 7 -11 -13 INVC #1775 Invoice 11052013 10/25/2013 Transaction Date 1115/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 5 SAUN_DERS, JOEL & SUSAN Ck# 044756 11/5/2013 Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits VILLA DOCK KEY DEPOSIT REFUND- J & S SAUNDERS -MI NNETRISTA Invoice 11052013 10/22/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 8 VERIZON WIRELESS - Ck #044757 111512013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013 -WATER Invoice 9713210447 10/13/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds Invoice 9713210447 10/13/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9713210447 10/13/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9713210447 10/13/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9713210447 10/13/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9713210447 10/1312013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9713210447 10/13/2013 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9713210447 10/13/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9713210447 10/1312013 CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10-13 - 2013-IKM CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013- STREETS CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013 -SEWER CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013- PLANNING CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013 PARKS CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013- CITY MGR CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013 -FIRE DEPT CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- 2013 2362- $609.18 $50.00 $50.00 $198.69 $33.16 $193.53 $195.47 $21.24 $119.40 $63.45 $181.06 $33.15 MOUND, MN 11/05/139:56 AM Page Payments CM OF VIOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment G 101 -22816 Personal Cell Phone CELL PHONE CHARGES 9 -14 -13 THRU 10 -13- $1.87 2013 ESCROW TO BE REIMB Invoice 9713210447 10/1312013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,041.02 _Refer 4 WEBLEASE USA Ck# 044758 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising Invoice 63924 10/15/2013 Transaction Date 11/412013 Refer 9 XCEL ENERGY d -� Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 302831785 10/1412013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 0493566920 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 302831785 10/14/2013 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 0493822228 10/25/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Fund Summary 680 HRA PUBLIC HOUSING 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 602 SEWER FUND 601 WATER FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 101 GENERAL FUND MONTHLY WEBSITE SVC HWS 10 -15 -13 TO $99.00 11 -14 -13 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Ck #044759 11/512013 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8128 TO 9/28 LIFT STATION Total $99.00 $102.98 SHORELINE COMMERCE STREET LIGHTS ELECTRIC SVC -9/23 TO 10/22 CIVIL SIREN ELECTRIC SVC - 8/28 TO 9/28 ELECTRIC SVC CARLOW RD K -1 LIFT STATION 9 -24 TO 10 -23 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 10100 Wells Fargo $2,287.51 $99.00 $375.11 $673.12 $23.80 $50.00 $588.78 $24,481.56 $28,578.88 Pre - Written Check $28,578.88 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $28,578.88 -2363- $67.34 $35.64 $76.66 $282.62 -2364- MOUND, MN 11/06/13 1:36 PM �V Page 1 Payments CtTY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Batch Name 0913KENGRAV User Dollar Amt $3,678.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,678.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 44 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SERVICES SEPT $1,182.00 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -314 Legal P/W PUBLIC WORKS LEGAL SERVICES SEPT $48.00 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -318 Legal Parks PARKS - WOLNER FIELD LEGAL SERVICES $384.00 SEPT 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23284 4991 SPARROW- INFINITY 4991 SPARROW- EASEMENT LEGAL SVC $360.00 SEPT 2013 Invoice 116849 10/2412013 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SERVICES SEPT 2013 $168.00 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -316 Legal P & I P &I OAKLAWN /HAWiHORNE LOT SPLIT $276.00 LEGAL SVC SEPT 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23286 DASTRUDE- 2001ARBORLN 2001 ARBOR LANE LEGAL SERVICES SEPT $24.00 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23287 FRIEDRICHSEN5913FAIRFI 5913 FAIRFIELD RD VACATION APP LEGAL $156.00 SERVICES SEPT 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23288 JESBERG 1728 FINCH #13- 1728 FINCH LANE VARIANCE APP LEGAL $120.00 SERVICES SEPT 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23289 WERTH 5116 WATERBURY 5116 WATERBURY LAND USE APP LEGAL $168.00 SERVICES SEPT 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment G 101 -23261 Sprint/Nextel - 2355 Chat Ln. SPRINT ANTENNAE LEASE AMENDMENTS $252.00 LEGAL SERVICES SEPT 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs 2012 STREET PROJ LEGAL SERVICES SEPT $492.00 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Project PW1201 Cash Payment E 401 -43114 -300 Professional Srvs 2014 STREET PROJ LEGAL SERVICES SEPT $48.00 2013 Invoice 116849 10/24/2013 Project PW1401 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,678.00 -2364- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 1001M,.11111LIN Payments Current Period: November 2013 10100 Wells Fargo $3,138.00 $540.00 $3,678.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,678.00 Total $3,678.00 -2365- 11/06/13 1:36 PM Page 2 MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM ,.— _- ._-- ......` Page 1 '�� Payments Ctl"Y OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Batch Name 111213CITY User Dollar Amt $226,210.93 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $226,210.93 $0.00 in Balance Refer _ 35 ABC FIRE AND SAFETY, INCORI Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1847 10/22/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Refer 2 ACMEAWNING Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 1415 10/17/2013 P022892 Transaction Date 11/512013 Refer 1 ALLIED WASTE -- 5# ABC FIRE EXTINGUISHER W /BRACKET, CHEMICAL, VALVE REPAIR Wells Fargo 10100 Total HALF BARRELL CANOPY- COMPLETE GRAPHICS -NEW CITY HALL Project CH2O13 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa NOV 2013 GARBAGE SVC PUB SAFETY BLDG Invoice 0894 - 003323950 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa NOV 2013 GARBAGE SVC PUB SAFETY BLDG Invoice 0894 - 003323950 10125/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa NOV 2013 GARBAGE SVC PUB WKS Invoice 0894 - 003323952 10/25/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa NOV 2013 GARBAGE SVC CITY HALL Invoice 0894- 003320742 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -384 Refuse /Garbage Disposa NOV 2013 GARBAGE SVC PARKS Invoice 0894- 003321260 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 670 -49500 -440 Other Contractual Servic CITYWIDE RECYCLING OCT 2013 Invoice 0894 - 003320451 10/25/2013 Transaction Date 5/8/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 36 APACHE GROUP Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -216 Cleaning Supplies Invoice 168351 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 168351 10/29/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Refer 3 ASPEN EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 10122282 10/22/2013 PO 24088 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 10122282 10/22/2013 PO 24088 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 10122282 10/2212013 PO 24088 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 10121756 10/10/2013 $156.56 $156.56 $1,815.00 $1,815.00 $131.16 $131.15 $131.38 $136.23 $377.00 $12,991.77 $13,898.69 C -FOLD TOWELS, BATH TISSUE, TRASH $191.60 BAGS -PUB SAFETY BLDG C -FOLD TOWELS, BATH TISSUE, TRASH $191.60 BAGS CITY HALL Wells Fargo 10100 Total $383.20 BUILDOUT 2013 FREIGHTLINER CAB & $49,362.57 CHASSIS PUB WKS VENICLE BUILDOUT 2013 FREIGHTLINER CAB & $6,170.32 CHASSIS PUB WKS VENICLE BUILDOUT 2013 FREIGHTLINER CAB & $6,170.32 CHASSIS PUB WKS VENICLE V MOTOR SHAFT $9.62 Project 13 -3 -2366- MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM - Page 2 \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Transaction Date 111512013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $61,712.83 .�. 37 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY _Refer Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies COFFEE & CREAMER FIRE DEPT $120.00 Invoice 1128966 10/30/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.00 Refer 4 BIFFS, PORTABLE RESTROO _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $369.29 SEPT 18 TO OCT 15 2013 Invoice W509307 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) MOUND BAY PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $535.00 SEPT 18 TO OCT 15 2013 Invoice W509308 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC SEPT 18 $380.00 TO OCT 15 2013 Invoice W509309 10/1612013 _ Transaction Date 615/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,284.29 5 CENTERPOINT ENERGY(M_INNEG _ _Refer Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 2649 EMERALD DR. LS E3 GENERATOR $21.17 NATL GAS SVC 7 -23 -13 THRU 10 -18 -13 Invoice 11122013 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 4791 NORTHERN RD LS D1 GENERATOR $18.47 NATL GAS SVC 7 -23 THRU 10 -18 -13 Invoice 11122013 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 3303 WATERBURY RD LS GAS SVC 7 -23 -13 $17.69 THRU 10 -18 -13 Invoice 11122013 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 2990 HIGHLAND BLVD LS 61 GENERATOR $18.35 NATL GAS SVC 7 -23 -13 THRU 10 -18 -13 Invoice 11122013 1012212013 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -383 Gas Utilities 4948 BARTLETT LS E2 GENERATOR NATL $21.17 GAS SVC 7 -23 -13 THRU 10 -18 -13 Invoice 11122013 10/2212013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -383 Gas Utilities 4728 CARLOW RD LS GENERATOR NATL $18.31 GAS SVC 7 -23 -13 THRU 10 -18 -13 Invoice 11122013 10/22/2013 Transaction Date 4/3/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total . .... .»—.. .... ,1... . -.,. .,. , .... .. $115.16 1111 .1111 -- 1 1 1 .,, -_.,,N .,, -111 Refer 6 DUANE S66 SERVICE _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -210 Operating Supplies INSTALL TIRES EMERGENCY VEHICLE $80.00 Invoice 520868 10/3012013 PO 24271 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 7 FIRSTLAB _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -305 Medical Services RANDOM DRUG SCREEN PUB WKS $39.95 Invoice 00699542 10/7/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -305 Medical Services RANDOM DRUG SCREEN PARKS $39.95 Invoice 00699542 10/7/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $79.90 Refer FITTEST, INCORPORATED_ _ _38 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260300 Professional Srvs 36 FIT TESTS- FIREFIGHTERS $900.00 Invoice 736 10/20/2013 -2367- MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM Page 3 \\ Payments CiTY OF NIGUND Current Period: November 2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $900.00 Refer 8 FIVE TECHNOLOGY Cash Payment E 101 - 41920 -210 Operating Supplies INSTALL NEW ROUTER - RESTART PUB $218.34 SAFETY SERVER Invoice T3629 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY MANAGED SVC & NETWORK $1,800.00 MTCE- NOVEMBER 2013 Invoice 128040 11/1/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,018.34 Refer_ 9 FLEETPRIDE TRUCK & TRAILER P _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 30# CYLINDER, REFRIGERANT $76.95 Invoice 56947873 10/11/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CREDIT FOR INVC #56939737 - $89.72 Invoice 56947838 10/11/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts FILTER, SECONDARY FUELWATER $13.74 Invoice 57358465 10/3112013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts COMPRESSOR KIT - SWEEPER #407 $109.95 Invoice 56819366 10/4/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs TRUCK #605 REPAIR DIRRERENTIAL, $2,729.18 AXELS,GEARS Invoice 57176470 10/29/2013 PO 24193 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,840.10 Refer 10 FORTIER7 JOHN - HYPOLITE D_E_SIG Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous PREP & PAINT NEW WINDOWS, PATCH BY $1,224.41 COPIER, PAINT HALL LOBBY -NEW CITY HALL Invoice 11122013 10/1512013 Project CH2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,224.41 Refer 16 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30/13 TO 11/29/13 PARKS $117.15 Invoice 11122013 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30/13 TO 11/29/13 LIFT $70.58 STATION LINE Invoice 11122013 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30/13 TO 11/29/13 HWS $566.54 Invoice 11122013 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30/13 TO 11/29/13 SEWER $451.74 Invoice 11122013 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30113 TO 11/29113 WATER $438.45 Invoice 11122013 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30/13 TO 11/29/13 STREETS $438.45 Invoice 11122013 10/3012013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30/13 TO 11/29/13 PD $317.59 Invoice 11122013 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30113 TO 11/29/13 FIRE $317.59 Invoice 11122013 1013012013 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -321 Telephone & Cells PHONE SVC 10/30/13 TO 11/29/13 CITY HALL $952.78 Invoice 11122013 10/30/2013 Transaction Date 10/16/2013 Wells Far— 10100 Total $3,670.87 MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM Page 4 Payments CITY OF Re0UN Current Period: November 2013 11 G & K SERVICES _ _Refer Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 10 -28 -13 CITY HALL $156.07 Invoice 1006782611 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 11 -04 -13 LIQUOR STORE $59.57 Invoice 1006793921 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 10 -21 -13 LIQUOR STORE $59.57 Invoice 1006771384 1012112013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 10 -28 -13 LIQUOR STORE $59.57 Invoice 1006782605 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -7 -13 PARKS $45.95 Invoice 1006748788 10/7/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies SHOP SUPPLIES 10 -07 -13 PARKS $67.76 Invoice 1006748788 10/7/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 10 -28 -13 PARKS $80.18 Invoice 1006782614 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -28 -13 PARKS $51.40 Invoice 1006782614 10/2812013 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 10 -28 -13 $123.00 Invoice 1006782613 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 10 -28 -13 FIRE DEPT $100.84 Invoice 1006782612 10/2812013 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -21 -13 PARKS $45.95 Invoice 1006771392 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies SHOP SUPPLIES 10 -21 -13 PARKS $67.76 Invoice 1006771392 10/21/2013 Transaction Date 10/212012 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.62 Refer 12 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -14 -13 $26.95 Invoice 1006760137 10114/2013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -14 -13 $27.42 Invoice 1006760137 10/14/2013 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM. SVC 10 -14 -13 $39.38 Invoice 1006760137 1011412013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 10 -14 -13 $189.09 Invoice 1006760137 1011412013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -21 -13 $26.95 Invoice 1006771391 10/2112013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -21 -13 $27.42 Invoice 1006771391 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -21 -13 $39.38 Invoice 1006771391 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 10 -21 -13 $147.55 Invoice 1006771391 10/21/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -28 -13 $26.95 Invoice 1006782610 10128 /2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -28 -13 $27.42 Invoice 1006782610 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -28 -13 $39.38 Invoice 1006782610 1012812013 -2369- Invoice 2013-61 10/15/2013 Transaction Date 11/412013 Refer 17 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41110-350 Printing Invoice 39802 10/30/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Refer 14 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11122013 11/1/2013 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11122013 11/1/2013 Cash Payment E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11122013 111112013 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 11122013 11/1/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Refer 18 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM COMM Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Sws Wells Fargo 10100 Total CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER 8 PG, NOV, DEC, JAN 2013-14 PRINT, FOLD,MAIL- 6,000 COPIES Wells Fargo 10100 PUNCH, NUTS- CENTENNIAL BLDG DEDICATION CEREMONY 10-7-13 Total FLOWERS- CENTENNIAL BLDG DEDICATION CEREMONY 10-7-13 MOVING DAY EMPLOYEE LUNCH 10-23-13 BOTTLED WATER & ICE FIRE FIGHTERS Wells Fargo 10100 Total 3RD QTR 2013 PEG ACCESS FEE PER SUBSCRIBER Invoice 11122013 10/1012013 Transaction Date 111412013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 23 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 4TH QTR 2013 LMCD LEVY PAYMENT Invoice 11122013 1115/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 24 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR -2370- Total Total $25.00 $1,45019 $1,450.29 $24.99 $10.72 $18.69 $38.24 $92.64 $12,185.32 $12,185.32 $5,469.50 $5,469.50 MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM Page 5 Payments 'TT y OF M 0 U N D Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 10-28-13 $193.97 Invoice 1006782610 10/28/2013 Project 13-3 Transaction Date 1111/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $811,86 Refer 13 GOPHERSTATE ONE CALL Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call OCT 2013 LOCATES $153.03 Invoice 82477 10/31/2013 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call OCT 2013 LOCATES $15102 Invoice 82477 10/3112013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $306.05 Refer 15 HANLEY, FRED& CONNIE Cash Payment G 101 -23279 HANLEY 2511 LAKEWOOD REFUND ESCROW 2511 LAKEWOOD LANE $313,25 VARIANCE- F & C HANLEY Invoice 11122013 11/4/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $313.25 Refer. 16 HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYERS Cash Payment G 101 -23291 BOYUM-2544COMMERCE-P MAILING LABELS - 2544 COMMERCE BLVD- $25.00 PC #13-32 Invoice 2013-61 10/15/2013 Transaction Date 11/412013 Refer 17 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41110-350 Printing Invoice 39802 10/30/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Refer 14 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11122013 11/1/2013 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11122013 11/1/2013 Cash Payment E 101-41310-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11122013 111112013 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 11122013 11/1/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Refer 18 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM COMM Cash Payment E 101-49840-300 Professional Sws Wells Fargo 10100 Total CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER 8 PG, NOV, DEC, JAN 2013-14 PRINT, FOLD,MAIL- 6,000 COPIES Wells Fargo 10100 PUNCH, NUTS- CENTENNIAL BLDG DEDICATION CEREMONY 10-7-13 Total FLOWERS- CENTENNIAL BLDG DEDICATION CEREMONY 10-7-13 MOVING DAY EMPLOYEE LUNCH 10-23-13 BOTTLED WATER & ICE FIRE FIGHTERS Wells Fargo 10100 Total 3RD QTR 2013 PEG ACCESS FEE PER SUBSCRIBER Invoice 11122013 10/1012013 Transaction Date 111412013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 23 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATI Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 4TH QTR 2013 LMCD LEVY PAYMENT Invoice 11122013 1115/2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 24 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR -2370- Total Total $25.00 $1,45019 $1,450.29 $24.99 $10.72 $18.69 $38.24 $92.64 $12,185.32 $12,185.32 $5,469.50 $5,469.50 MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM Page 6 Payments CATY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous CITY HALL COPIER MOVE - LOFFLER TRUCK $133.59 Invoice 1646153 10/2412013 Project CH2013 Transaction Date 11/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $133.59 Refer m. 19 LUBE TECH, INC. Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs VAC SVC, LIQUIDS REMOVAL $200.00 Invoice 2280347 10/18/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment R 602- 49450 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu USED OIL BULK PICK UP RECYCLE - $131.25 CREDITS - 10 -11 -13 Invoice 199787887 10/11/2013 Project 13 -3 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68.75 20 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE _ _Refer Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES DECEMBER 2013 $47,720.38 Invoice 0001027117 11/412013 _ Transaction Date 7/15/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47,720.38 Refer 21 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $77.50 WATER TESTS Invoice 675640 10115/2013 Transaction Date 913/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.50 Refer 22 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA_TIO _ Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib NOV 2013 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,983.33 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 11122013 11/1/2013 Transaction Date 1115/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,983.33 Refer 25, NOVAK-FLECK INC. _ Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow REFUND ESCROW 2325 NORWOOD LANE- $5,000.00 BP #2013 -00457 Invoice 11122013 11/5/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Refer 26 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 679805058001 10/23/2013 PO 22896 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 679012720001 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 679012721001 10/17/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Refer 39 O- REILLYAUTO PARTS Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 2462 - 183253 10/18/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Refer 40 PERFORMANCE PLUS LLC Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -305 Medical Services Invoice 3604 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -305 Medical Services Invoice 3605 10121/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 COPY PAPER -CITY HALL LASER HET INK CARTRIDGE- HWS LAMINATING POUCHES- HWS Total $5,000.00 $146.90 $120.76 $123.06 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $390.72 POWER OUTLET -FIRE DEPT $8.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8.00 RESPIRATOR QUALIFIER MEDICAL TESTS $750.00 10 -14 -13 HEPATITIS B VACCINE- HEITZ, FARLEY $190.00 -2371- Invoice 44039 MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM Refer 33 TRUE VALUE, NAVARRE Cash Payment Page 7 Invoice 607630 Payments Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Refer 34 UHL COMPANY CiTy OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $940.00 Refer 41 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair BACK PACK BLOWER- FIRE DEPT $144.85 Invoice W00448 8/22/2013 Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts OIL FILTERS, WHEEL, BALL BEARINGS, V- $517,70 BELTS ETC- PARKS Invoice P12253 1018/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts CHAINSAW REPAIR PARTS- STREET DEPT $6.12 Invoice P12246 10/8/2013 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms CHAINSAW SAFETY BOOTS- STREET DEPT $769.38 Invoice P12252 10/8/2013 PO 24189 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,438,05 Refer 27 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORA Cash Payment E 285-46388-440 Other Contractual Servic PARKING DECK ELEVATOR MTCE $2,340.60 CONTRACT 11-01-13 THRU 10-31-14 Invoice 8103588460 111112013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,340.60 Refer 28 SIMPLEXGRINNELL Cash Payment E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance ALARM & DETECTION MONITORING 12-01-13 $301.20 THRU 11-30-14 PUB SAFETY BLDG Invoice 76555889 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 101-42110-440 Other Contractual Servic ALARM & DETECTION MONITORING 12-01-13 $301.20 THRU 11-30-14 PUB SAFETY BLDG Invoice 76555889 10128/2013 Transaction Date 1011/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $602.40 Refer 29 SUN NEWSPAPERS-HWS ACCT. Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising FALL WINE SALE AD- HWS 10-5-13 $806.92 Invoice 29497 10/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising FALL WINE SALE AD- HWS 10-12-13 $806.92 Invoice 29497 10/512013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,613.84 Refer 30 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER-CITY Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE-10-5-13 $109,00 Invoice 32934 10/5/2013 Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE-10-12-13 $109.00 Invoice 32934 10/5/2013 Cash Payment E 101-42400-351 Legal Notices Publishing PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCY AD 10- $70.85 26-13 Invoice 44039 10/2612013 Cash Payment E 101-45200-351 Legal Notices Publishing POSC-PARKS COMMISSION VACANCY AD $70.85 10-26-13 Invoice 44039 10126/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Refer 33 TRUE VALUE, NAVARRE Cash Payment E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous Invoice 607630 10/16/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Refer 34 UHL COMPANY Wells Fargo 10100 Total $359,70 ALUMINUM TRIM CHANNEL-NEW CITY HALL Project CH2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -2372- $9,61 $9.61 MOUND, MN 11/08/138:39 AM Page 8 Payments w.13 a Y Or, R.nCUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous TEMPERATURE CONTROLS -FRONT END $9,700.00 NEW CITY HALL BLDG Invoice 22821 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 21612 8/25/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 21613 8/25/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Refer 31 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10128/2013 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10128/2013 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 303703346 10/28/2013 Transaction Date 11/1/2013 Refer - 32 ZEP MANUFACTURING CON Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 9000570498 10110/2013 Transaction Date 11/4/2013 Fund Summary 101 GENERALFUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 285 MOUND HRA 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 670 RECYCLING FUND Project CH2O13 VAV REPAIRS PROJECT NEW CITY HALL $10,350.00 BLDG Project CH2O13 INSTALL ELECTRICAL BASEBOARD $7,125.00 HEATERS NEW CITY HALL BLDG Project CH2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $27,175.00 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 SEWER $2,144.75 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 STREETS $568.74 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 WATER $3,486.00 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 HWS $1,955.13 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 PD $1,188.41 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 FIRE $1,188.41 DEPT ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 CITY HALL $1,616.75 ELECTRIC SERVICE - 8/24 TO 9/24 PARKING $1,215.21 DECK Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,363.40 ZEP TWISTER AERO DZ $115.18 Project 13 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115,18 10100 Wells Fargo $119,157.37 $17,521.78 $3,555.81 $10,625.56 $57,800.60 $4,558.04 $12,991.77 $226,210.93 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $226,210.93 Total $226,210.93 GJ / J MOUND, MN 11/07/134:13 PM Page 1 Payments cffY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Batch Name 111213CITY2 User Dollar Amt $32,383.36 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $32,383.36 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ALEXANDER, ED _ Cash Payment E 401 - 43113 -300 Professional Srvs REIMB SVC TO FIX SPRINKLER HEAD $143.63 AFTER STREET PROJ- 4662 KILDARE RD- E. ALEXANDER Invoice 11122013 11/412013 Project PW1301 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $143.63 Refer 3 ALPHA RUG AND CARPET CLEANI _ Cash Payment E 101 -41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic CLEAN CARPET- CENTENNIAL BLDG ALL $1,239.75 LEVELS 11 -1 -13 Invoice 2855 12/4/2013 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,239.75 Refer 22 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL $17.23 Invoice 00098542 10/3112013 Project 13 -3 Transaction Date 7/15/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $17.23 Refer 4 E_GAN COMPANIES Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -400 Repairs & Maintenance STREET LIGHTING MTCE $1,326.22 Invoice JC10090425 10/31/2013 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,326.22 Refer 5 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECH _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts HIDEAWAY STROBE TUBE -TRUCK #512- $122.24 WATER Invoice DJS100313 10/7/2013 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $122.24 Refer 6 FERGUSON_ WATERWORKS _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 10 5/8" WATER METERS, COUPLING WNJIRE $1,405.22 Invoice 005836 10/25/2013 PO 24192 Transaction Date 1117/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,405.22 Refer 9 H & L MESABI AGGREGATE CONS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts BLIZZARD BLADES FOR SNOWPLOWS $630.07 Invoice 88684 10/30/2013 PO 24187 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts BLIZZARD BLADES FOR SNOWPLOWS $357.18 Invoice 88684 10/30/2013 PO 24187 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $987.25 Refer 7 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -227 Chemicals CHLORINATED LIME BLEACH $186.38 Invoice 3525382 10/15/2013 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186.38 Refer 8 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 3 STANDPIPES- CURB BOX $129.53 Invoice B687751 10/30/2013 PO 24194 Transaction Date 1117/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $129.53 Refer 23 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP _ _2374_ MOUND, MN 11/07/134:13 PM —` Page 2 Payments UTY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts BOLT ON TRAILER JACK -PARKS $42.75 Invoice 96692 10/29/2013 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.75 Refer 2 _HOLLOMAN, LEONARDO_ _ Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 11122013 5/2812013 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 11 INFRATECH _Refer Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR FIRE HYDRANT- 4730 MANCHESTER RD PW 13 -01 Project PW 1301 Wells Fargo 10100 Total FLUORESCENT MARKING PAINT, BLUE, GREEN $64.32 $64.32 $102.60 Invoice 1300464 10/23/2013 Project 13 -3 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $102.60 Refer 10 INTERNATIONALCITY/COUNTYM _ Cash Payment G 101 -15500 Prepaid Items 2014 MEMBERSHIP DUES, HANSON, KANDIS $976.00 Invoice 11122013 11/6/2013 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $976.00 Refer 26 JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INCOR Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CONTRACT CLEANING CITY HALL $508.73 NOV 2013 Invoice MIN11130547 11/1/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -460 Janitorial Services MONTHLY CONTRACT CLEANING PUB $276.62 WRKS BLDG NOV 2013 Invoice MIN11130548 1111/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -460 Janitorial Services STRIP & REFINISH VCT FLOORS PUB WKS $614.53 BLDG Invoice MIN10130664 10/28/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -460 Janitorial Services DETAIL CLEAN, STAIRWELLS, EDGES, $828.28 STRIP & REFINISH VCT FLOORS CENTENNIAL BLDG Invoice MIN10130665 10/28/2013 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,228.16 Refer 12 LAKE_ RESTORATION, INC. _ Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -440 Other Contractual Servic SHORELINE DR EMERGENT VEGETATION $250.00 PROGRAM Invoice 109561 10131/2013 Transaction Date 9/1712013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250.00 13 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC _ _Refer Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials CABLE TIES, EAR PLUGS, CLEANER, LOCK $323.36 WASHERS, BRAKE CLEAN, ELECT TAPE,6 VOLT BATTERY, MTCE PAINT Invoice 9302022262 10/30/2013 Project 13 -3 Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $323.36 24 OFFLER COMPANIES, INCOR_POR _ _Refer _L Cash Payment E 10142400 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER $24.89 B & WHT OVERAGE 10 -10 THRU 11 -9 -13 Invoice 1650421 11/112013 -2375- MOUND, MN 11/07/13 4:13 PM -- Page 3 Payments ----- - - - - -- C11 rY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 4TH FLOOR COPIER $24.89 B & WHT OVERAGE 10 -10 THRU 11 -9 -13 Invoice 1650421 11/1/2013 Project 13 -3 Transaction Date 6/5/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $49.78 Refer 25 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING _ Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $25.00 WATER TESTS Invoice 978825 11/5/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 - Transaction Date 913/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 27 NAPA AUTO PARTS--- SPRING PAR _ Invoice P06388 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair GAUGE & ADAPTER Invoice 865582 9/12/2013 E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts Transaction Date 11/7/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 14 NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMPAN_ Invoice 27226 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials BULK COARSE HIGHWAY SALT Invoice 71038178 10/16/2013 E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials BULK COARSE HIGHWAY SALT Invoice 71041878 10/23/2013 Transaction Date 1117/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 15 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute OCT 2013 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 131066 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute OCT 2013 -CIS DATA HOSTING, PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 131066 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 131066 1114/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -322 Postage Invoice 131066 1114/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 - Refer 16 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice P06388 10/24/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Refer 17 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT, INC Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 27226 9/26/2013 PO 24188 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 27226 9126/2013 PO 24188 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Refer 18 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE, IN Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10120380 9/2012013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Refer 19 TONKA PLUMBING HEATING& CL OCT 2013- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE OCT 2013- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $25.00 $44.87 $44,87 $3,307.21 $9,883.17 $13,190.38 $1,797.15 $1,797.16 $315.01 $315.01 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,224.33 COOLANT GENERATOR SET BALDOR #1005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total WING WELDMENT, WING PIN- STREETS WING CUTTING EDGE, WING EDGES Wells Fargo 10100 MASTERTRACK TRAILER -PARKS $99,62 $99.62 $600.52 $603.84 Total $1,204.36 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 2376- $301.88 $301.88 MOUND, MN 11/07/134:13 PM .__..__ Page 4 / Payments ci I OF PNWItND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPLACE CITY WATER METER -3031 $100.00 HIGHLAND BLVD- 10 -11 -13 Invoice 6680 10/16/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total . I'll 111— - � $100.00 - - Refer 20 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA AUG 2013 WATER SYSTEM SURVEY, LEAK $2,361.00 REPORT Invoice 4360 10/14/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,361.00 Refer_21 WESTONKA SEWER & WATER, IN _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR LEAK @2056 COMMERCE BLVD $1,237.50 Invoice 7110 10/27/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,237.50 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $20,630.49 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $44.87 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $207.95 601 WATER FUND $7,679.03 602 SEWER FUND $3,571.02 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $250.00 $32,383.36 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $32,383.36 Total $32,383.36 -2377- MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND i Current Period: November 2013 Batch Name 111213HWS User Dollar Amt $129,913.58 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $129,913.58 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 436328804 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 436328804 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 460329509 10122/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 460329509 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 463330209 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 463330209 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438330903 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 438330903 11/5/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES Invoice 89216200 10/18/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 89222100 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE- CUPS, LOGO GLASSES Invoice 89222100 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES- SUCKERS Invoice 89253800 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 89253800 10/25/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 40303800 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 40303800 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 40317700 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 40317700 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 40193200 10/18/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 40193200 10/18/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 40409700 11/112013 -2378- $56.16 $1.00 $134.82 $1.00 $70.80 $1.00 $125.42 $1.00 Total $39110 $167.50 $29.00 $74.70 $30.00 $34.00 Total $335.20 $10.20 $409.00 $2,404.90 $34.10 $16.40 $886.90 $3,012.00 MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM Page 2 Payments MY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $32.55 Invoice 40409700 11/1/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,806,05 Refer BELLBOY CORPORATION -3 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,431.55 Invoice 40426300 11/412013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $72,00 Invoice 40426300 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,885,55 Invoice 40108400 10/14/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $162.00 Invoice 40126800 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,857.13 Invoice 40209000 10/2112013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5,10 Invoice 40426300 10/16/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,413.33 Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $78.75 Invoice 88263 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$1900 Invoice 88264 10123/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.75 Refer 6 COCA COLABOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $225,60 Invoice 015805050905 10/24/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $225.60 Refer 7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $174.60 Invoice 15625 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $348,00 Invoice 15774 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $87.00 Invoice 15918 11/112013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $815.00 Invoice 15949 11/4/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,424,60 Refer 8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,891,70 Invoice 725088 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $64,80 Invoice 725089 10129/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $235.20 Invoice 725333 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $552.00 Invoice 722987 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,61655 Invoice 723337 10/1512013 -2379- _ MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM --' Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.80 Invoice 724495 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,470.64 Invoice 724271 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,070.32 Invoice 726245 11/5/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,982.01 Refer 9 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $110.00 Invoice 2601 10/17/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $110.00 Refer 10 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $270.00 Invoice 159057 11/1/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $6.75 Invoice 159057 11/112013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $276.75 Refer 11 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ -11 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $869.75 Invoice 672281 10/24/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 -. ..- I ... ,.....m..- Wells Fargo ...... , -1-1 1 11 ... 10100 Total 1 . . I .. ... . 11 $869.75 1 1 ... _.. ,-. -., . Refer 1 . a- ....... ... 12 JJ TAYLOR, DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,451.45 Invoice 2139528 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $25.70 Invoice 2139529 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $47.00 Invoice 2061323 10/18/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $35.00 Invoice 014934 9/20/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,343.75 Refer 13 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,862.37 Invoice 2139448 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $38.80 Invoice 2139449 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.70 Invoice 2139464 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,026.10 Invoice 2139495 10/2212013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $196.80 Invoice 2139503 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $38.80 Invoice 2139496 10/22/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,206.57 Refer 15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR -2380- MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM _._ Page 4 Payments GITY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,619.52 Invoice 1694080 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $4,856.35 Invoice 1694081 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $33.99 Invoice 1694082 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,049,92 Invoice 1698802 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,661.70 Invoice 1698803 10/23/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,221.48 Refer 14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $90.75 Invoice 1704723 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,750.06 Invoice 1704720 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,522.25 Invoice 1704721 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $20.99 Invoice 1704722 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $240.00 Invoice 1694273 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$7.58 Invoice 596020 10117/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,616.47 Refer 16 LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -340 Advertising 4 X 10 4 -COLOR WINE SALE AD PG 7A $720.00 Invoice 00133128 1011512013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $720.00 Refer 17 MARLIN S_TRUCKING DELIVERY - Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -03 -13 $271.65 Invoice 28481 101312013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -07 -13 $62.35 Invoice 28492 10/7/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -10 -13 $432.75 Invoice 28638 10/10/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -14 -13 $26.10 Invoice 28649 10114/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -17 -13 $290.10 Invoice 28665 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -21 -13 $43.50 Invoice 28676 1012112013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -24 -13 $333.75 Invoice 28695 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 10 -31 -13 $168.65 Invoice 28716 10/31/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,628.85 Refer 19 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC -2381- MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM Page 5 Payments (NTt' OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -412 Building Rentals NOVEMBER 2013 COMMON AREA MTCE & $977.50 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 11122013 10/16/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $977.50 Refer 18 MOUND, CITY OF _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -382 Water Utilities WATER SERVICE 9 -3 -13 THRU 10 -1 -13 HWS $45.33 Invoice 11122013 10/20/2013 E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 -- Refer. .. .. 20 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic NOV MUSIC SERVICE Invoice AL30709 11/1/2013 Invoice 8420186 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 -� Refer 22 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA� E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8420186 10/14/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8420186 10/14/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 8420184 10114/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8420184 10/14/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8419993 10/11/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8419993 10111/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8421097 10121/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8421097 10/21/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Invoice 8420186 10/14/2013 Transaction Date 11 /6/2013 Wells Fargo Refer 21 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8423200 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8423200 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8423192 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8423192 11/4/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8421357 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 8421357 1012212013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8422060 10/28/2013 -2382- 10100 Total $45.33 $111.48 Total $111.48 $1,780.37 $22.50 $57.00 $2.25 $617.72 $8,75 $900.89 $12.50 $47.00 Total $3,448.98 $0.01 $0.00 $2,159.38 $43.75 $24.00 $225 $1,617.94 MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM Page 6 Payments UTY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $22.50 Invoice 8422060 10128/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,869.83 Refer 23 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $561,85 Invoice 2501789 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $207.00 Invoice 2501787 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $634.65 Invoice 2501788 10116/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-261 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,940.05 Invoice 2504932 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $976.40 Invoice 2504933 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $472.90 Invoice 2508818 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $532,65 Invoice 2508819 10/30/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,325.50 Refer 24 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC_ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 10-31-13 $15.00 EDITION Invoice 222575 10/21/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,00 Refer 25 SOUTHERN WINE& SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $630.00 Invoice 1088205 10117/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $36.14 Invoice 1088204 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $295.75 Invoice 1088203 10/1712013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $296.00 Invoice 1088206 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $54.00 Invoice 1093415 10/31/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $297,82 Invoice 1093414 10/31/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $252,81 Invoice 1090771 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $928,00 Invoice 1090772 10/2412013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $876,00 Invoice 1090773 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $452.27 Invoice 1090774 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$121,33 Invoice 335071 10/24/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,997.46 '-2383- MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM Page 7 Payments Current Period: November 2013 Refer 26 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,124.59 Invoice 787018 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $348.00 Invoice 786848 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$5.37 Invoice 787020 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $92.90 Invoice 787019 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $9.00 Invoice 787019 11/5/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $175.00 Invoice 783568 10/18/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $178.25 Invoice 784364 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $692.70 Invoice 784363 10/22/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,615.07 Refer_ 27 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $111.85 Invoice 782931 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $18.00 Invoice 782931 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,449.30 Invoice 782930 10/15/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $117.25 Invoice 785634 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $9.00 Invoice 785634 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,110.30 Invoice 785635 10/29/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $62.00 Invoice 786720 10/31 /2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,877.70 Refer 28 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies REGISTER PRINTER RIBBONS $95.81 Invoice 50283 10/23/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.81 Refer 29 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED_ _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $90.00 Invoice 0085543 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0085543 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $152.00 Invoice 0085544 10117/2013 Cash Payment E 60949750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0085544 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $86.00 Invoice 0086077 10/24/2013 -2384- MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM /.v - -- - Page Payments CAM OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0086077 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $552.00 Invoice 0086726 11/1/2013 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $55.33 Invoice 0086727 11/112013 Cash Payment Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $945.33 Refer 30 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $840.00 Invoice 344351 10131/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $16.50 Invoice 344351 1013112013 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $440.00 Invoice 343775 10/24/2013 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.40 Invoice 343775 10/24/2013 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $176.00 Invoice 343098 10/1712013 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.40 Invoice 343098 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $52.80 Invoice 343098 1011712013 Invoice 221769 10/1812013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $88.00 Invoice 342807 10/14/2013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,630.10 Refer 31 WINE CONNECT Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising NOV 2013 HWS WEBS ITE $95.12 Invoice 1161 11/1/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 .. „.. .... Wells Fargo 10100 Total ............ ..... r-. - .. ,. $95.12 ... _. .. .- ,.._,,._. ,. .. .mow ..a., , Refer 32 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,064.00 Invoice 475642 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,154.72 Invoice 476517 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,632.00 Invoice 477528 10/3012013 Transaction Date 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,850.72 Refer 33 WINE NEWS INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE ENTHUSIAST NOV 2013 ISSUES FOR $15.00 SALE Invoice 221769 10/1812013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE ENTHUSIAST CALIF -2013 SPEC $25.00 EDITION ISSUES FOR SALE Invoice 221769 10/18/2013 Transaction Date 11/612013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $40.00 34 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,065.55 Invoice 1090128533 10/23/2013 -2385- MOUND, MN 11/08/139:06 AM __..�..,, Page 9 Payments CITY OF riIOU D Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $739.00 Invoice 1090128534 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $428.00 Invoice 1090128535 10/23/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $17.74 Invoice 001598RPA 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT $926.52 Invoice 001621 RPA 10/29/2013 Transaction Dale 11/6/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,179.09 Refer 35 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,647.85 Invoice 1090131905 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $86.00 Invoice 1090131907 10/30/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $140.00 Invoice 1090133173 10/31/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,153.60 Invoice 1090125111 10/16/2013 $129,913.58 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.50 Invoice 1090125112 1011612013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 1090125113 10/16/2013 Transaction Date 11/712013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,128.95 Refer 36 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $779.50 Invoice 1080100850 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,540.96 Invoice 1080100849 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $48.00 Invoice 1080100851 10/24/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $926.52 Invoice 1080097770 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,718.50 Invoice 1080097771 10117/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $64.00 Invoice 1080103615 10/31/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $955.77 Invoice 1080103614 10/31/2013 Transaction Date 1116/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,033.25 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $129,913.58 $129,913.58 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $129,913.58 Total $129,913.58 -2386- MOUND, MN 11/08/1310:29 AM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Batch Name 10- 13TV -CQ User Dollar Amt $776.24 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $77614 $0.00 In Balance Refer_ 4 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/M _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts HUB OIL, FUEL FILTERS #605 $3710 Invoice 6974 - 212743 10/3/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts FUEL FILTERS #412 $31.25 Invoice 6974 - 213596 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts ELECT MECH FLASHER $7.47 Invoice 6974 - 214112 10/2412013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts STD MINIATURE LAMP $1.66 Invoice 6974 - 214185 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -221 Equipment Parts STD MINIATURE LAMP $1,65 Invoice 6974 - 214185 10/25/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts AIR FILTERS, HYD FILTERS $57.59 Invoice 6974 - 214516 10/30/2013 Transaction Date 111812013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $136.82 Refer 1 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE)_ - Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies PASTIC CLAMP, SCREWS, NUTS $23.14 Invoice 109274 10/12/2013 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies AUTO FUSE HOLDER, FUSES, RING $18.75 TERMINAL Invoice 109278 10/12/2013 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies OUTLET SURGE STRIP $18.16 Invoice 109224 10/10/2013 Transaction Date 11/812013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.05 2 TRUE VALUE MOUND (POLICE) _ _Refer Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous 3 MIL CLR SHEETING $27.77 Invoice 108951 10/2/2013 Project CH2013 Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -210 Operating Supplies FOAM WASHNJAX- VEHICLE MTC $6.93 Invoice 108951 10/2/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous ADHESIVE, CLR LTX SEALANT $8.53 Invoice 109131 10/8/2013 Project CH2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous TRANSFORMER $7.48 Invoice 109250 10/11/2013 Project CH2013 Cash Payment E 101 -49999 -430 Miscellaneous SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $15.97 Invoice 109172 10/9/2013 Project CH2013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $20.30 Invoice 109356 10/15/2013 Project CH2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous MOUNTING TAPE, ALUM TRIM CHANNEL $21.34 Invoice 109402 10/1612013 Project CH2013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $3.46 Invoice 109457 10118/2013 Project CH2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -402 Building Maintenance V BELT- PUB SAFETY BLDG MTCE $6.94 Invoice 109464 10118/2013 Transaction Date 11/8/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $118.72 Refer �� 3 TRUEVALUE, MOUND (PWPKS) _� r -2387- MOUND, MN 11/08/1310.29 AM ,.._ _.. -.., Page Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials RETURN HYDRA OIL - $21.36 Invoice 108906 10/1/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply KEYS $8.51 Invoice 108918 10/1/2013 Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -210 Operating Supplies LOTION SOAP- PARKING RAMP $14.95 Invoice 108952 10/2/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous PVC PIPES- NEW CITY HALL $82.02 Invoice 108960 10/2/2013 Project CH2O13 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous PVC PIPE, ELBOW, COUPLING -NEW CITY $26.09 HALL Invoice 108964 10/2/2013 Project CH2O13 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SNAP LINK, EYE BT -HWS $6.38 Invoice 108990 10/3/2013 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply RETURN CREDIT -55.42 Invoice 109012 10/3/2013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -230 Shop Materials SNAP LINK, EYE BT -HWS $7.03 Invoice 109012 10/3/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair/Maint Supply COUPLING, NIPPLES #195 $14.28 Invoice 109032 1014/2013 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply TREAD STEP LADDER $18.16 Invoice 109119 101812013 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply EXPANSION JOINT $13.88 Invoice 109122 10/812013 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -221 Equipment Parts ADJ NOZZLE -PARKS $11.75 Invoice 109128 10/8/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -212 Motor Fuels ANTIFREEZE GALLONS $19.17 Invoice 109130 10/8/2013 Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -430 Miscellaneous PVC PIPE, COUPLING -NEW CITY HALL $10.56 Invoice 109174 10/9/213 Project CH2O13 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply YEL WIRE CONNECTOR $2.45 Invoice 109175 10/9/2013 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials DRILL BITS -SIGN SHOP $29.90 Invoice 109225 10110/2013 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies CLEANER, MOP HEAD, TRASH BAGS, DOG $58.74 TREATS Invoice 109392 10/16/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -212 Motor Fuels GAL THREAD CUT OIL AUTO SHOP $45.95 Invoice 109406 10116/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials SEALANT, ADHESIVE -SIGN SHOP $11.73 Invoice 109434 10/17/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies HD GFCI OUTLET $19.23 Invoice 109570 10/2212013 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous APPLIANCE CORDS $9.07 Invoice 109598 10/23/2013 Project CH2O13 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -430 Miscellaneous SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $1.47 Invoice 109603 10/23/2013 Project CH2O13 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -210 Operating Supplies SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $3.85 Invoice 109631 10124/2013 Project 13 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply REFRIGERATOR LIGHT -CITY HALL $2.98 Invoice 109641 10/24/2013 -2388- MOUND, MN 11/08/1310:29 AM Page 3 \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: November 2013 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies TRASH BAGS, SOAP, BELT DRESSING $34.49 Invoice 109749 10/28/2013 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply SEWAGE CHECK VALVE, COUPLING $32.03 CONNECTOR Invoice 109569 10/22/2013 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 2" COUPLING $2.76 Invoice 109571 10/22/2013 Transaction Date 11/812013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $460.65 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $414.18 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $60.05 285 MOUND HRA $14.95 601 WATER FUND $17.14 602 SEWER FUND $170.31 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $99.61 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $776.24 Total $776.24 $776.24 -2389- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 22, 2013 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, October 22, 2013, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None. Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Finance Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Senator David Osmek, Theresa Malloy Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda Salazar requested the removal of item 4D and Hanus requested the removal of item 4G. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $418,301.50. B. Approve minutes of the October 8, 2013 regular meeting. C. Approve one day liquor license for the Knights of Columbus - Council #6005 for a pig roast on November 23 or 24, date to be determined, with fee paid. D. Removed. E. Approve proposal from Municipal Code Corporation to update the City Code for all Ordinances enacted since recodification in 2009. F. RESOLUTION NO.13 -96: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FROM JAMES KUEHN FOR PROPERTY AT 4633 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE G. Removed. -2390- Mound City Council Minutes — October 22, 2013 H. Approve pay request from American Engineering Testing, Inc. in the amount of $1,410.30 for geotechnical engineering services for the 2013 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Project, City Project No, PW- 13 -01. I. Approve pay request from American Engineering Testing, Inc. in the amount of $1,528.45 for geotechnical engineering services for the 2013 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Project, City Project No. PW- 13 -01. 4D. Cancel regular meeting set for December 24. 2013 due to holiday Ray Salazar requested this item be removed from the consent agenda so that the "Christmas Eve Holiday" could be referenced in the wording. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to cancel the regular meeting set for December 24, 2013, due to the Christmas Eve Holiday. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4G. Mayor Hanus requested this item be removed from the consent agenda in order to modify the wording to delete references to the Landscaping Plan Security Reduction in order to allow for further evaluation. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Gesch, to approve the following resolution as amended and striking references to Landscaping Plan Security Reduction. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 13 -97: RESOLUTION APPROVING GRADING PLAN FOR SECURITY RELEASE FOR WOODLYN RIDGE 5. Not used on the agenda. 6. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None were offered. 7. Pausche stated that per the Council's request at the October 8, 2013 regular meeting, the contract with the Meisels was included in the packet. The original calculation for the 2012 -2013 C8D assessment contained an error and so instead of the Meisels paying $321.98, the City owes the Meisels $528.02. The Meisels were informed and Staff did not receive any further feedback. Mayor Hanus stated he is in favor of approving the resolutions, but that this program needs to be evaluated each year since it constitutes a direct business subsidy. A. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 13 -98: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 2013 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING MAINTENANCE ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 6% INTEREST - LEVY #18642 -2391- Mound City Council Minutes — October 22, 2013 B. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 13 -99: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTINUANCE OF THE LANGDON AREA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PARKING PROGRAM FOR 2013 -2014 8. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager City Manager Kandis Hanson gave an update on the relocation of City Hall to the former police department space. The building will now be known as Mound City Offices, including Police, Fire and City Hall, but that public meetings will continue to take place in the Centennial Building. Mayor Hanus thanks Senator David Osmek for coming to tonight's meeting. B. Minutes: C. Reports: Finance Department — September 2013 Harbor Wine & Spirits — September and Year -To -Date D. Correspondence: 9. Adiourn MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid to adjourn at 7:15 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -2392- Mayor Mark Hanus Consulting Engineers & Surveyors , " J 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com November 6, 2013 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project City Project Nos, PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 Pay Request No. 6 Dear Ms. Hanson: O Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 6 from GMH Asphalt Corporation for work completed on the 2013 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project from September 28, 2013 through October 25, 2013. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $382,391.21 to GMH Asphalt Corporation. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. c0t Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance -2393- DATE: 111512013 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 6 CONTRACTOR GMH Asphalt Corp. 2013 STREET IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound City Project Nos, PW- 13 -01, PW- 13 -02, PW -13 -05 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk SMI PROJECT NO. C12.105545 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 9/28/2013 THROUGH 10/25/2013 TOTALAMOUNT BID____.___ --- ---- --- -- . ........ ... $ 4,274,544.41 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS + EXTRA WORK ....... .............:....:.......:.:................. ............................... $ CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT ................... ........ -. _�................... TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE...... ..:... ..... ..........._..................................::...............,. .......�..............- ...._... $ TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE---.,. .... ................ .... ..... ..__...... ..,...:...,... ..,::...... ..... .:............. $ DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED ..................._......-_.... ............._.,.........,..... $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS ..._ ..................... ....:...::...................:.. ......_................- ..,.... $ RETAINEDPERCENTAGE ( 5.0% ) ... ........ ......._...--------- ................ .,............. -....... ... ... ..... ........... . $ TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS,..._..._ .............................._..,..........._......,,...... .....,.:.,.....:.,.,..,..:.,... $ NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE. ... ....... — ... $ TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES_, .......... ..... ._........................__.,.......... ......,... ... ..... ..... _....... $ PAYCONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 6 ... ........... _.::..._:.,...._... ... ..._... .._.....,..._..._.,,.........,. _....._.:............,_ $ Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, ail items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: GMH Asphalt Corporation 9180 Lake Town Road Chaska, MN 55318 By Name Title Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2636 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 , ' gJ By -y; ,� �1 l PROJECT ENGINEER Daniel L. Faulkner Date // Z& 1, APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND By Name Title Date -2394- 290,698.41 4,565,442.82 4,444,714.84 4,444,714.84 222,235.74 4,222,479.10 3,840,087.89 382,391.21 $p ESCD 8 e \ Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 - Fax (952) 448 -8805 -% www.bolton- menk.com November 6, 2013 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2013 Lift Station Improvement Project City Project No. PW -13 -03 Pay Request No. 2 Dear Ms. Hanson: 1 e. Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 2 from Minger Construction, Inc, for work completed on the 2013 Lift Station Improvement Project from September 28, 2013 through October 25, 2013. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $211,395.38 to Minger Construction, Inc. Sincerely, BOLTON & HENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance -2395- DATE: 11/4/2013 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 2013 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 13 -03 BMI PROJECT NO. 012.105944 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 2 9/28/2013 THROUGH 10/25/2013 CONTRACTOR Minger Construction, Inc. OWNER City of Mound ENGINEER Bolton & Menk, Inc. TOTALAMOUNT BID ........... .._.. ................ ................. . .......... ... ............... .............. .._...................... ........... -- ....... .... $ 377,289.50 APPROVEDALTERNATE BID ... .................................. ................................... ............. ....... ......... --- $ 72,107.50 CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT ..................... --- .............,..,....,,.............,..,,......... ............_.................. $ 449,397.00 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE .............................................................................. ............................... $ 456,156.55 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE ......................................................................................... ............................... DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED .............................. ............................... TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS ...... ............. ....... ........................................................ ............ $ 456,156.55 RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 5% ) ...................... - ......... ......... ........ . ............................. ..................... $ 22,80T83 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS .............. .... ... ..... ......... ........ --- .................... .. . ....... - ............ .--- . $ _ NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE ............. .......... ... ..................... ............. ........ ........................ ---- $ 433,348.72 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES .......................... --- ......... ............. ............. .......,, ... ,................. $ 221,953.35 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 2 .................. ..... ... .... .......... .,.., ........ .............. -- .............. ............................ .. $ 211,395.37 Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: Minger Construction, Inc. PO Box 236 2471 Galpin Court, Suite 110 Chanhassen, MN 55317 By Name Title Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & ME,(N1K,,, INC., E, f ' N /GJIN.EEERS. 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 By jQZ-11'IA:V -i` L'Z. — C'GL,L2n__ , PROJECT ENGINEER Date APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND 0 -2396- Title Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: November 6, 2013 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 13 -25 & 13 -26 — Variance and Expansion Permit for 4431 Lamberton Road REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Mr. Jezierski, has requested a variance and expansion permitfor the construction of a new deck and home remodel for a garage addition at his property at 4431 Lamberton Road. The property is located at the corner of Lamberton Road and Island View Drive. The existing 1.5 story home, which was constructed in 1920, is set at an angle on the 7,480 square foot property. _. • i1 irb�9Li7�17 � /l�r�r /_\ 1117:7 L9311 The Planning Commission reviewed this case at theirOctober 1" meeting and recommended unanimously for its approval. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. The Planning Commission was concerned about the level of hardcover that wouldresult from the construction. On October 2, 2013, a revised survey was received whch shows existing hardcover at 50.8% and proposed hardcover at 58.4°/x. On November 1, 2013, the applicant provided a revised hardcover plan showing post construction hardcover of the site at 52.8% which still exceeds the existing condition of 50.8% The applicant has indicated that this is the worst case scenario and Staff is in agreement that there ways to modify the hardcover with the project. Staff continues to work with the applicant regarding hardcover and a recommended condition is that the hardcover on the site be limited to the existing condition of 50.8 %. The Planning Commission also expressed concern that the construction would be located very close to the adjacent neighbors. The applicant has had conversation with the neighbors and received the attached letters from the neighbor about this project. Staff is recommending additional conditions including the execution of easements, replacement of property irons if disturbed and the use of erosion and sedimentation control practices. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approvalof the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. Staff recommends approval of the resolution including the conditions and findings of fact. 12397 -Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION # 13- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE AND EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 4431 LAMBERTON ROAD PID #19- 117 -23 -34 -0045 WHEREAS, the applicant, Joseph Jezierski Jr., submitted a request for a variance and expansion permit for a home remodel project at 4431 Lamberton Road; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the R -1A single - family residential zoning district requires a 20 foot front yard setback, 6 foot side yard setbacks, and a 15 foot rear yard setback; and WHEREAS, the existing 1920 home on the property is nonconforming as it is located only 16.47 feet from the front property line; and WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to expand the home by digging out the ground level; adding a second stall and some storage to the garage; and creating a deck on top of the expanded garage; and WHEREAS, the applicant seeks the following setbacks for this project Required Proposed Front Yard (north) 20.0 feet 16.47 feet (existing per 1989 survey) Side Yard (west) 6 feet 5 feet (garage addition) Rear Yard (south) 15 feet 3 feet (garage addition) ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. -2398- (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Section 129 -2, "Expansion Permit" is defined as follows: Expansion Permit means a permit which is granted by the City Council for the expansion or enlargement of a nonconforming structure in accordance with Section 129 -40. and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting expansion permits which are provided below: (a) Criteria. An expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the reasonable use of the land. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the applicant must satisfy the City Council that the following criteria exist: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. -2399- b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. and; WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance and expansion permit for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated September 26, 2013 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance and expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance and expansion permit were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its October 1, 2013 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the variance and expansion permit, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance and expansion permit request at its November 12, 2013 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The variance is requested due to the location of the existing 1920 home on the site and not due to the actions of the applicants. 3. The variance is being requested to facilitate the construction of a second stall to the garage and a deck above. 4. The expansion of the residential home to include a two -car garage will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. -2400- WHEREAS, in granting approval of the expansion permit, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. 2. The expansion permit is requested due to the location of the existing 1920 home on the site and not due to the actions of the applicants. 3. The expansion permit is needed so as to facilitate the expansion of the basement to increase the livability of it by lowering the floor level. The expansion of the residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. and; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance and expansion permit with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall work with Staff to modify that proposed project so as to maintain hardcover on the site equal to or less than the existing 50.8 %. 2. If access or use of adjacent property or properties is needed for construction of the project, the applicant shall provide a draft form of a temporary construction easement, or similar document, in a form acceptable to the City, prior to execution for approval by the City prior the issuance of the building permit. The temporary easement may be recorded and shall be determined by the City. If any part of the retaining wall will be permanently located on the adjacent property or properties, a permanent private easement(s) shall be prepared for Staff approval and then executed with the neighbor(s). Any permanent private easement shall be recorded. If there is mortgage on the property, written consent from all lienholders for the easements will be required. 3. Applicant shall comply with building and /or fire code regulations regarding the proximity of the structure to the property line. 4. Applicant shall replace the iron property monuments if they are disturbed or destroyed during construction. 5. Applicant shall employ appropriate erosion and sedimentation control practices during construction. 6. Applicant shall have a foundation survey to ensure that the proposed addition is located as proposed which is no closer than 5 feet from the west property line and 3 feet from the south property line. -2401- 7. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 8. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 9. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 10. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all applicable conditions have been met. 12. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 13. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 14. The variance and expansion permit are hereby approved for the following legally described property: (to be inserted) Adopted by the City Council this 12t' of November 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -2402- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1, 2013 Chair Ward called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, George Linkert, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert and Councilmember Mark Wegscheid. Members absent: David Goode, Cynthia Penner. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Joe Jezierski, Jr (4431 Lamberton Rd); Gary & Cec Meister (5125 Windsor Rd); Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Jim Brunzell (5111 Windsor Rd); Mike Werth (5116 Waterbury Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS A. Review of Variance and Expansion Applications 4431 Lamberton Road Applicant: Joseph Jezierski Rita introduced the applications to remodel the existing home and construct a new deck. The expansion request is due to the excavation of the basement of the existing, non- conforming home and garage to increase the basement height from 6 ft 9 inches to 8 ft 5 in. The variance is a result of the garage expansion towards the rear and side lot lines. Hardcover is and will continue to be an issue on the lot but the property owner has said he is willing to work with staff to minimize the hardcover. Staff has determined that there is no other way to expand the garage without use of the variance procedure and recommends approval with conditions as outlined in the planning report. Linkert said that, initially, it looked like there was lots of property to consider but, after looking further it was noted that there was only one place for the garage. Retterath asked if the hardcover issue is usually resolved by the time the Council acts on requests like this. Rita said that it varies. Retterath questioned if the goal was to maintain the present hardcover. Rita said that improving the hardcover is the goal. Retterath thought that the plan seemed a little loose. Smith indicated that conditions will be included in the resolution and will be checked before the building permit is issued. Joseph Jezierski (4431 Lamberton Rd) stated that where the garage addition sits is already hardcover. He indicated that the removal of the wooden retaining wall is being addressed -2403- with the affected neighbor. He also stated that he is very open to working with pervious pavers. Retterath asked if they could move the garage forward to increase the 3 foot setback. lezierski replied that, if it's possible, he's open to changing the plan. Bergquist wanted to know if the neighbor approved of the plan. lezierski said that he's talked with some and gotten positive response. Discussion Retterath stated that he'd like to see the rear setback at 5 feet because during construction excavation of the neighbor's yard it will likely be needed on a temporary basis for the construction of the foundation. Increasing the setback to 5 feet would reduce the amount of excavation that would need to take place on the neighbor's property. The expansion permit is valid because the basement height needs to be increased. There is a real need for more storage. Bergquist would like to add a 10th condition to require written approval of the project by the neighbors. Smith indicated that there is no consideration by the Council of neighbor support when approving or denying the request. Linkert thought the 5 foot setback would be reasonable, but, 3 feet will be adequate. To make it smaller would not be useful for him. MOTION by Linkert, second by Wiechert, to recommend approval of the variance and expansion permits per staff recommendations and conditions. MOTION approved. Bergquist, Gawtry, Linkert, Wiechert and Wegscheid voted yes. Retterath voted no. -2404- N i5 Q C m n�iO � i�sA l F L----------------------- - - - - -- -2405- , , , , Sjt E'1 „ a - 2406 - c � N a 3 Z Q a 8A1AQ MON Pu" 147 O � . -I 1v21v NwvJ 3N f2A5 apVww /o Wl Ypva p/ uaMV! Yvd -. . �'• e ('�-, X93 —." &W h h F f. ti T<SC._� •' �1' _4432 vF / 6 �Nd O ' gs Vi 3E comas 3 cc 2 LTV zi z O c nN 3�y 45 Ez. vu R 2 K N <, '_ m _sd3=° -2407- - Concerning Variance and Expansion Permit applications for: Joseph T. Jezierski Jr. @ 4431 Lamberton Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 Pembroke Lots: 1 & 2, Remodel of existing Basement and single car Garage, plus an addition of a second single car Garage with Deck. We are the applicant's neighbors owning the property to the South of the applicant's property, Mike & Ann Stoopes, 3105 Island View Drive, Mound Minnesota, 55364. We have been given copies of the Land surveys, and the proposed Design drawings. We have had the opportunity to discuss the plans with the applicant, and voice any concerns with him that we may have. We know that the Applications have already been before the Mound City Planning Commission, and have been approved. We also understand that a Neighbor's agreement is not needed to proceed with the process of obtaining a Building Permit from the City. We know we, or our Representative, may attend the City Council meeting on November 12f°, or at any date after that, about the Permit request, to express any concerns, or to address, and receive answers for any questions we have,. The applicant has provided space below to pat any concerns, or questions, we have at this time in writing for the City Council to consider before the meeting. Concerns or Questions: D nG'. a.__71r.._S'o�'�wrsf' A4 C) rtrnvACi duri'n r'n-< N O'7 Ut'Ing 4118 C&-t1e? cCAtsi no eaysic d / t�8(,Tt- OCCU:1'S deals c t tzinjn9 ylte s�r�j - /� /�` 7� 7a Mike & Ann Stoopes -1, 3501 Island View Drive Mound, Minnesota, 55364Lf- Y.uC'�" Sienature(S) Date *A",t Kv '�6,pei O,Ad Afi, t I i 1 +E l</ � � i Concerning Variance and Expansion Permit applications for: Joseph T'. Jezierski Jr. (c, 4431 Lamberton Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 Pembroke Lots: I & 2, Remodel of existing Basement and single car Garage, plus an addition of a second single car Garage with Deck. I am the applicant's neighbor owning the property to the West of the applicant's property, Colleen TaBe, 4429 LambeThm Road, Mound Minnesota, 55364.1 have been given copies of the Land surveys, and the proposed Design drawings. I have had the opportunity to discuss the plans with the applicant, and voice any concerns with him that I may have. I know that the Applications have already been before the Mound City Planning Commission, and have been approved. I also understand that a Neighbor's agreement is not needed to proceed with die process of obtaining a Building Permit from the City. I know, I or my Representative, may attend the City Council meeting on November 12 "i, or at any date after that, about the Permit request, to express any concerns, or to address, and receive answers for any questions I have,. The applicant has provided space below to put any concerns, or questions, I have at this time in writing for the City Council to consider before the meeting. Concerns or Questions Colleen Taffe 4429 Lumberton Road Mound, Minnesota, 55564 Signatures) Date -2409- • •u DATE: PLANNING CASE NO: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director September 26, 2013 13 -25 and 13 -26 Expansion Permit and Variance Mr. Joseph Jezierski Jr LOCATION: 4431 Lamberton Road (PID NO. 19- 117 -23 -34 -0045) ZONING: R -1A Single Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Mr. Jezierski, has requested an expansion permit and a variance for the construction of a new deck and home remodel for a garage addition at his property at 4431 Lamberton Road. The property is located at the corner of Lamberton Road and Island View Drive. The existing 1.5 story home, which was constructed in 1920, is set at an angle on the 7,480 square foot property. REVIEW PROCEDURE Variance City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. -2410- According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Expansion Permit City Code Section 129 -40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued when the City Code imposes practical difficulties for the property owner in the reasonable use of a property. The following are the criteria that should be satisfied: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. 60 -DAY PROCESS The expansion permit and variance applications were submitted on July 2, 2013. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be July 3, 2013. In accordance with Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound executed an extension to October 30, 2013. Given that the applicant requested a delay in Planning Commission review of the application in August and September, the applicant has granted the -2411- City of Mound an additional 60 -days for action on the applications. With the applicant extention, the City's deadline for action on the expansion permit and variance applications is on or before December 28, 2013. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION As noted previously, the existing 1.5 story home sits at an angle on the 7,480 square foot property. The applicant is proposing a number of projects on the home, including: 1) The excavation of 20" in the basement of the home and existing garage to increase the height from approximately 6 feet 9 inches previously to 8 feet 5 inches (7 feet 9 inches under dropped beam). 2) Expansion of the home to the northwest to accommodate a new garage and storage area. 3) Construction of a deck on top of the new garage. The applicant narrative and attachments provide background information about the property and the reasons for the requested expansion permit and variance. Front Yard (north) Side Yard (west) Rear Yard (south) Hardcover (maximum 40 %) CITY /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Required Existing Proposed 20.0 feet 16.47 feet 16.47 feet (Source: 1989 survey) 6 feet 16.80 feet 5 feet (garage addition) 15 feet 2.4 feet 3 feet (garage addition) 2,992 sq. ft. 3,767 sq. ft. Will increase unless addressed, see discussion below Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: City Attorney Sarah Sonsalla I reviewed the expansion permit and variance applications for 4431 Lamberton Road. My only comment is that the applicant did not fill out the practical difficulties sections in the variance application (although he does a pretty good job of laying out the practical difficulties in his letter). The City may want to request that he complete these sections in order to make sure that it has all of the information and can make appropriate findings. Staff Note.• Refer to supplemental information provided by applicant on September 12, 2013 that was included as an attachment. -2412- Fire Chief Greg Pederson I have reviewed and I have no fire code issues or comments about this application. City Engineer Dan Faulkner The proposed garage stall is close to property lines and is very close to the westerly neighbor's deck. Drainage from the additional hard surface shall not be directed onto the adjacent properties. MCWD Regulatory Program The project does not appear to trigger any District rules Manager Steve Christopher and we have no further comment. DISCUSSION The applicant is seeking to complete a remodel of his existing home to expand the height of the basement, add a second stall to the garage, and construct a deck on top of the garage expansion. The City of Mound has generally determined a two -car garage to be a reasonable request for single - family homeowners. Given the location of the home on the property, there are limited alternative options for the applicant to construct a garage addition. The applicant is requesting an addition approximately 12 feet in width so as to allow for a 10 foot wide garage door to accommodate his vehicle. Application materials show that the existing hardcover on the site is 50.4 %. This is more than the 40% allowed by an existing lot of record. if no changes are made, the proposed expansion will add approximately another 475 square feet of hardcover, raising the hardcover percentage to around 56 %. Staff notes that the existing gravel driveway extends the width of the house and has approximately 1,118 square feet of impervious surface. Staff recommends that a condition of approval be that the applicant work with Staff to modify the project so as to maintain hardcover at or less than the existing 50.4% on the property. Staff views the removal of additional hardcover beyond the current condition as favorable. Per City Code, minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. A one (1) foot setback is required for driveways. The City Code also requires driveways to be hard surfaced. • Applicant is advised that City Code Section 129 -197 (c) includes the list of allowable encroachments. For example: Eaves can extend into the yard area provided they do not extend more than two feet into the yard area. Gutters are an allowable encroachment and are not subject to setback. - Steps are allowable encroachments as long as they are setback a minimum of two (2) feet from any lot line. - Retaining walls are exempt from setbacks. However, any retaining wall over four (4) feet requires a building permit and the submittal of engineering and /or structural certification. -2413- The list of items referenced in City Code Sec. 129 -2 (Definitions) which do not qualify as a "structure' shall be considered to be allowable encroachments unless another section of the code requires a setback. The definition of a structure is as follows: Structure means anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires more or less permanent location on the ground or attached to something having a permanent location on the ground, except the following: (1) On -grade stairways and steps not exceeding six feet in width and landings connected to such stairways or steps not exceeding six feet in width and six feet in length; (2) Boardwalks not exceeding six feet in width; (3) Driveways not exceeding 24 feet in width; and (4) Sidewalks not exceeding six feet in width. • Suggest applicant contact Building Official Scott Qualle to discuss the project including what specific information will be required for the basement expansion; also to discuss the applicable building code requirements for structures located within certain distances between property lines and structures including, but not limited to, fire rating of walls, building openings and /or extensions especially due to the close proximity of the detached garage to the property line. The Building Official was provided a copy of the submitted application and materials as part of the City's routing process. • Applicant is advised that a foundation survey will be required as the proposed addition is within the required yard area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the expansion permit and variance for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall work with Staff to modify that proposed project so as to maintain hardcover on the site equal to or less than the existing 50.4 %. Applicant shall have a foundation survey to ensure that the proposed addition is located as proposed which is no closer than 5 feet from the west property line and 3 feet from the south property line. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 4. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 5. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit -2414- application. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. S. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered for the expansion permit: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. 2. The expansion permit is requested due to the location of the existing 1920 home on the site and not due to the actions of the applicants. 3. The expansion permit is needed so as to facilitate the expansion of the basement to increase the livability of it by lowering the floor level. 4. The expansion of the residential home will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered for the variance: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The variance is requested due to the location of the existing 1920 home on the site and not due to the actions of the applicants. 3. The variance is being requested to facilitate the construction of a second stall to the garage and a deck above. 2415- 4. The expansion of the residential home to include a two -car garage will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Pending recommendation from the Planning Commission, the proposed applications will be forwarded to an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible meeting dates are Tuesday, October 8, 2013 or Tuesday, October 22, 2013. 2416- nA cary of r�+oufro 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952- 472 -0600 FAX 952- 472 -0620 FAI :1 2�t Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No. Planning Commission Date City Council Date Please tvne or print lenibiv SUBJECT Address i �� Q✓� ��f` p h PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Block DESC. Subdivision PID# zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 131 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name PS<1 PL Email STSIKI.. -ME L 1 LA+Z.Ge OWNER A43 ( 1 Address i?i �� 70� c — /I� /� Phone Home�52.472. 2�f1�z_d&L 6(2.619,5(4 Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (>9 No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): zns &mac R641t(,Mr e�LLI cZcyi<f i" 40 (9-At AZT variance Information (1/18/2013) Page 4 of 6 -2417- Case No. —12 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: ( N S E W ) Rear Yard: (NSEW) Lakeside: (NSEW ) :(NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft REQUESTED (or existing) ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow W'shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: nR-W1NAL dOUSE LOOS 0'17 aR IA) I.AT '"C e Variance Information (1/18/2013) Page 5 of 6 -2418- Case No. 13 "Z(; 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No A. If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (f9. if yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (�4), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signatur Date Z Jukt 201 Applicant's Signature Jn / Date ZJ4 / 20, /3 Variance Information (I /v1 6/2013) Page 6 of 6 -2419- E F ®J04 { Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Please type or print lesaibiv 2 2013 Case No. 0 --� C SUBJECT Address �3i t �i7Vl�j�L t�i� i�CAD PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Block DESC. Subdivision PID # R1A R2 R3 B1 62 B3 (Circle one) Zoning: R44 PROPERTY Name �� ( Email �JKt 'i� cztA,c . dos�f "�1 O1A/NER Address 7q3( LA,46E- ,—mQ QoAD CALL W �� 6 1�l1� Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (�K) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Expansion Permit Information - 242(0- (1/30/2013) Page 4 of 6 Case No. - - =— 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. SETBACKS: REQUIRED Front Yard: (N S E W) ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. (NSEW) ft. Street Frontage: ft. Lot Size: sq ft Hardcover: sq ft REQUESTED (or existing) ft ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft •'-► M •► ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No ( ). If no, specify each non- conformity: 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: ( ) too narrow () topography ( ) soil ( ) too small () drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow (<j shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: <O Lt (, (N4 L *4o USP S a t.t t �A Tr FP y Ci S Expansion Permit Information -2421- (1/30/2013) Page 5 of Case No. (-a _ 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No If yes, explain: 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (�/). If yes, explain: 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (Y), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature —`==_�� Date 2 j cz & y Z013 I Applicant's Signatu I Date 2117 V ZO (S Expansion Permit Information 2422 (1130/2013) Page 6 of 6 From: Joseph T. Jezierski Jr. 4431 Lamberton Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 To: City of Mound Planning Commission 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 Subject: Addition and remodel of Garage Sara and Commission: ✓lfC 9/� 1 am including this letter along with the Documentation and Pictures to h ll show and explain the Project. I do this hopping to answer some of the quick questions that may come to mind. Architect: KCP Home Design, Inc. 7516 77`h Street Chaska, Minnesota, 55318 Contractor: Theis Construction Co. 6270 Forest Glen Lane Carver, Minnesota, 55315 Surveyor: Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. 5811 Cedar Lake Road Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55416 (Address was valid in 1989) Documents include: • The Architect's preliminary drawings o North Elevation o Foundation Plan o Main Floor Deck addition Plan o Building Section • Copy of Land Survey I had done in 1989 o Split across two 11 by 17 sheets • Drawing showing Addition added to Survey drawing • Pictures of Site as of today 2 July 2013 • Southern Neighbor's House • Southern Neighbor's House, and My House • Southeast corner of My House in direction of Addition • Southern view of My House looking at area where Addition would be • Western Neighbor's House and Southwest corner of My House • Area where Garage Addition would be • Current Garage with Wife's Mini Cooper • View showing area where Addition would be in relation to Eastern Neighbor's Deck • Retaining Wall behind where Addition would be • Retaining Wall showing corner with Eastern Neighbor • Front view of my Truck showing width • Side view of my Truck showing length -2423- I bought my House in 1975, and over the last 38 years I have basically built a "New" house that looks the same from the Outside. I have updated all the Electrical, Plumbing, replaced two foundations and block walls, Windows, Sheetrock, and even some walls. This Remodel /Addition to the Garage is for two reasons. The first as you can see from the picture showing the current Garage with the Mini in it, it shows how low the space is. The Mini's antenna actually runs along the Garage door driving in and out. I have never been able to pull any of my Trucks in even a little, just to work on something out of the weather. That brings us to the second reason, I will be 62 years old in August, and I'm a 100% disabled Veteran, I am tired of cleaning the Snow off my Truck. Being able to jack -up and work on a vehicle inside would be wonderful. The original part of the house was a "Cabin" on a slab, the walls were surplus Hatch covers from Liberty Ships built for World War 2. The Hatches where stood up on a short "Knee - wall", where the electricity was run through, Rafters were put on top and Roofed. In the process of doing these updates I discovered this house started when there were no Setback rules or if there were any it was 3 feet, as you can see from the two pictures for the South side of my house. The Timber Retaining wall is on my property the Chain -link fence on my neighbor's property to the South. So I am fully aware of Setbacks and getting Variances. Because I have the understanding for the reasoning behind Setbacks, I told the Architect to use 6 feet as a Setback when creating the design. I knew that this was still not within present Setbacks for the City, however there is no way to do anything useable to this house and to be compliant. Now for the reason why I have included the pictures of my Truck. As the design is now, it will not fit. Well it will fit, however I would have to fold the mirrors back any time 1 pulled in or out, because there would only be a 1/4"' of an inch between the mirrors and the Garage door. Also I would have to pull in tight against the front wall so the Garage door would not hit the rear Bumper when closing. Because of this I am begging you to allow me to go with a 5 foot Setback on the East side (there by allowing a 10 foot wide Garage door), and allow me to use the 3 foot Setback on the rear wall (South wall where the Retaining wall is now). This would give me room to squeeze around the front or rear of my Truck with the Garage door down. I would have the drawings redone; I just wanted to get my paperwork in so the process could begin. The wood Retaining wall would be removed, and the new Cinder block wall would be back - filled. Any part of the Retaining wall beyond the Garage would be replaced with Landscape block like that used by the City for its ongoing Street update projects. The other pictures (with the P.O.D.) are to show that this is the best placement of the project, with the least impact on my neighbors, increasing my ability to use the area for vehicle and indoor storage (as you can see I have a number of little "sheds" that could go away, along with the other items stored outside) I have a good relationship with my neighbors and believe this will be an acceptable placement of the Addition, and I will get the proper Agreements done as we move forward. Thank -you for your time on this, and for your service to the City. Again please, please, consider the modified Setbacks. Thank -you: / c Joseph T. Jeziersk 1 -2424- To: Sarah Smith — Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road 1 s� Z013 Mound, Minnesota, 55364 RECD SEP From: Joseph T. Jezierski Jr. 4431 Lamberton Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 -9136 Sarah: This is my written formal request for the 60 -Day Letter of Extension per MS 15.99 - Variance and Expansion Permit Applications. Unfortunately the drawings for the expanded Basement and Garage addition were not ready in time for the August, or September Planning Commission meeting. I asked for and received a deferral from the August meeting to the September meeting. The new Drawing were not completed in time for that either, so now that I have received them (on September 10th), I request to be scheduled for the October meeting. I would also like to address the points of the Determination of Completeness — Variance and Expansion Application, City Code Section 129- 39(a): (1.) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. Defined as follows: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. i hC 1c;fftic; St 1 +)r 111c VW i�MCU is did': to the fact that tho l:TO!(.{ t as 1)!Y)T osud would 3.li ' CC't tFi" fEtST;T , Oallflall Cc';. OC?tt llally fl- pare"! of i,c.dd us 9 emilroke lot 1, 2, 3 4 & 5, Solnc lcirld of (h ellilig was bU.tlt on L,ot 1.;'Sonl£'LnnY in ihu 1920'v (l liave i, +.t:Ltl iold) :l'ltb a "Sct- bMick - from fill; Southern lnt'£)l f ity lino )f' I i .a:i. 't-ccaus4 of t#-i s' and tLat the C ?,ist4ilt; +L;19Se is tiG! .l( Sli& 1131 all'1;: Oil flly f-01[5, I hilt e (0 Ito 11'trtnU<.lh 1b: v -,r,. o'K I` VroCc:durc anytinic 1 do an t ti:ng, to Tile footprint of� t V IMOUl C. (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner. l hi,. 1onso and boss, wei- . a ",Narded to the 1TV if(; ",Ii d Divot c:, Sometime in the , 1 70' , `N Ilc;i1 tint' J "old me the house it 19 5 it ilic:lud xi Lots I & I shc: kc It ':_ots 3, 4, & 5. Somcliint its. t11c I 980's N Ibink, she bliss lots 3, 4, c`t ? rcdkf ncti to croatc Lt- o larger buildable Lots iliat'P�vo 110USeS Ci'4':fe ?slut on. Thi har:se to nny Nt cst vk as Built at a tine , wlicii "Set -back" oidirianevs w rc 6 of 3 fWct, To snake iliCy- house t icet existing, "`vet- Set C,(}ifu:: 1 ,d.ould 11 we iU c;ii;'. 1, (,CCs ill l�t.fki. low l +l;�le( {('ii "Jic't, iiti£1 ? fv:Y oll�t'Ji ° a`dOTE ll4' i1 { t rnc'r o niv 1iollSt, 1 rcq UCSt the Soil',. }l wa',i of dw, nc (iaiag be d' the ^ fool "`vc °t- f }ack- bo;a4lisc any sllorter and niy 1?idl -up 'I rack (a. 2W 0 l=ord 1150), vvo fflu t)e s,ind4s'icllcd fl,ght Ircl�y.'c Li the back wall and ,11(" t" _t &l �Jge O(0OT. P it t; Lhc N137'i "<il "S tl (itilti ahvaVIF i <ivc ('U bc in t0 ➢t):ft c i( in o) ow ofd 0 l "oot Gvide door, tl.c widt,i toat cotfld b- Cis R Ifil -2425- t 6 ;iii} "Sc1- baek': v" the \Ft'c'S! 4o 1hi' i s, 1,111 xit(tic`.l;iii7r : a y tool tip b,,,6t Lo the V?t c5f. (iii) The variance, if granted will not alter the essential character of the locality. `t. 1161dil:iol,l l'311 proposin F oold F did a 1 cal i. °aiagc, and slot -C sp} ie:: to ti7E', SOliti7 t4C'Si O; the is xISCtiI Eti l Cat' G ii:3£!c (2 tUCK- L111dc °t) The a +,Ftii l ?(?ll t\ ill 1Jc f81' i:.lCilP L.11 l)aC {. on am IIrC't1:ii`ri }' ,O that It 2.i'I') !iOt (. <i Lttic <`t77y 74llil (i ricck;ss Pro lc; its !'or i-y nci Y?l3,' oi} 1,o tho 7V "L ";±.. S wood, ako bt'-. \vell t1L,lo ii', SiiCi c1 It r11;2; Us :�.ltit;£:: t�E'oti2 Trt t' rl 'I._T.'71ioi" t <,} tl1C; `JOt7il1, cind'i isual.ly t)1£ }ckcd by Trec" i. aiid shrub) , o'' "hat. 27CI£'l?bor 3 prop(;.rzy, screc"!iing 1ny lwusc. 1,1 10 addidon l storage Would !? iko it so that k can gul rid of all the lit +lc Stora�c cortsiners arc)und 711. {2)V11 '11} all ' nut all the Latatil, Gard(,ning and Laa n, iCt ih7 A 1pacZ , trluclt to ihc.fm of iT i V! ifo eld N,;ighbol S. The project will also lower the existing Basement and Garage floor 20 inches; this is to create spaces with usable Headroom for someone 6 Feet or more tall. The entire Project will greatly increase the Value of the property, and ease of Resale. I hope we can schedule this for the October Planning Meeting and come to a successful decision to move forward on this project next spring. Thank -you Joseph T. Jezierski Jr. Attachments to EMail: Cover letter to Mound (MSWord) C4798 BSMT 9- 9- 13.pdf C4798 ELEVATION 9- 9- 13.pdf C4798 SECTION 9- 9- 13.pdf C4798 BSMT OPT CEILING 9- 9- 13.pdf C4798 MAIN FL 9- 9- 13.pdf Jezierski survey 9- 9- 13.pdf 2 c x �x a h O b <7 sF F� �a E �y h a� 0 O C s ti O IUSdPB t MULM a=d w>ue» ^ ^ ST ATT/ TT N CONa 6270 Fo- 2427 -r uvE CARPER, MN 66316 61Y -969 -3303 (li' DE SIGN. INC. ' ^^ '°°'Lrei"w>ee noan s =ra ra ,n> eaae. em> w aaers ercc� era- sre ->ess pajA1O1m'> `1' "' GL_ 6Hi. \ 0Y'GFpED 3iAM t O I �N ti til b ~ k, o� m J; I _071 ----- - - - - -- I I: r �Y� Vb �nh _ -2428 - m y� n g . hi Q�6 P,,.• «� by � r,ti u t A1kI Iv Au 1t`�1!A� �� tt �t O \ / it l l CH Hl � f{ O N 2 h pp i77 k�m F h\ n a r z Spa � ` a ¢60C m g_� II`I � �i e�rgn•o m I i 1 5 P PAO Lv AS iR p.^ms UM Ri.J45Yf. V�g�gFP H P -2429- RWM -2430- rSLAND VIEW DRrVE \ +�� }\ 2 ��y n }� � �} tm - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - -2431- 7Z,/;7 f &, 'Ir IN } iSoo 8757'02"E 1701- �G/ 0 ,6 -955,*a � � � \� � � � y� � � � � � � � � \ `� \ . w <2� � � � � »� . . ��x. �� >�� :�. . . ��i�.:�� >.:y . � °� « . :� � . . . . © ° \� °� »� � « »: ) a� �� \ ^: .< . . \«. �� . . v� z «.. ��.d».�� -� \. � � / \� y��. . : � � � ° � : : < d�.:�� /. /. �� ± d \� � \ \ ©� »m »y»m } E �� -2440- Ja 1 3 i tl §[ k 4 OF -2440- Ja I R ^ 2= ? > . g «° A ` . � : \ t4..� Al 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director and Carlton Moore, Public Works Director Date: November 8, 2013 Re: Landscaping Plan Security Reduction — Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision Background Steve Bona, on behalf of Woodlyn, LLC, submitted a request on October 10, 2013 to release the Grading Plan Security in the amount of $10,000.00 and to reduce the Landscaping Plan Security from the current amount of $26,625.00 to $12,312.50, pursuant to Sec. 2.01 of Development Agreement with Woodlyn, LLC, for work completed on the Woodlyn Ridge construction project. At its October 22, 2013 meeting, the Council authorized release of the Grading Plan Security but did not reduce the Landscaping Plan Security to do additional review of the completed improvements. Public Works Director Carlton Moore and Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson did a field inspection on October 30, 2013 to evaluate the activities completed related to the Landscaping Plan dated November 13, 2007: • The small retaining wall on the corner of Lot 11 is complete. • The landscaping on Lots 1 and 11 fronting County Road 15 has been completed along with the landscaping in the rear yards of Lots 1 -4. • It was noted during the inspection that some minor modifications were made in the field. However, Staffs review is that the plantings are consistent with the approved plan. • Generally speaking, the remaining landscaping work in Woodlyn Ridge can be summarized as follows: Boulevard trees need to be planted with the exception of Lot Lot 1 which has been installed along with one additional tree. Rear yard landscaping on Woodlyn Ridge lots behind the retaining walls needs to be done. Supplemental Information from Developer • The quantity and size of trees meets or in many cases, exceeds the approved plan and noted that the installed landscaping is almost identical to the approved plan, with any minor changes being a step up from the plan -2445- • When comparing the approved landscape plan to what was installed, there were only two species modifications: Crabapple trees were installed instead of Hackberry trees Ponderosa pines were installed instead of Austrian Pines Mr. Bona commented that Crabapple trees are more hearty and give more color and the Ponderosa Pines are better looking tree than Austrian Pines. • Mr. Bona indicated that all of the trees Installed are larger than what was required per the plan and that the end result, with the minor changes, leads to a better finished product. A copy of contactors planting list has been included as an attachment. Mr. Bona confirmed that the invoice amount of $10,756.00 has been paid. Additional Comment Mr. Bona was invited to attend the 11/12 City Council meeting. However, he is notable to attend due to a conflict. Recommendation Based on Staff review and inspection, Staff deems the completed improvements, including the minor in -field modifications, to be consistent with the approved Landscaping Plan and recommends approval of the draft Resolution to reduce the Landscaping Plan Security. • Page 2 -2446- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13-_ RESOLUTION APPROVING AND LANDSCAPING SECURITY REDUCTION REQUEST FROM WOODLYN, LLC WHEREAS, Steve Bona, on behalf of Woodlyn, LLC, has requested that the Ciy of Mound reduce the Landscaping Plan Security from $26,625.00 to $12,312.50 as outlined in the submitted request dated October 10, 2013; and WHEREAS, Mound Staff has reviewed the submitted request and recommends approval; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota to approve reduction of the Landscaping Plan Security from $26,625.00 to $12,312.50 as recommended by Staff. Adopted by the City Council this 12th day of November, 2013 Attest: City Clerk Catherine Pausche -2447- Mayor Mark Hanus DESIGN- A- SCAPES, LLC PO BOX 6 ROCKFORD, MN 55373 Voice: (763) 477 -5033 HOMESTEAD PARTNERS 525 15TH AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS, MN 55343 QUOTATION Quote Number: 1214 Quote Date: Sep 22, 2013 Page: 1 MOUND, MN Customer 1D Good Ibnj ^ Payment Terms Sales Rep HOMESTEAD- WOODLYN 10/22/13 C. O D. 2.00 2.5 "BB SEANA GLEN MAPLE 305.00 610.00 6.00 8' BB BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 295.00 1,770.00 11.00 6' BB BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 215.00 2,365.00 4.00 8'BB PONDEROSA PINE 295.00 1,180.00 6.00 6'BB PONDEROSA PINE 215.00 1,290.00 6.00 2" CRAB 199.00 1,194.00 6.00 YARDS MULCH - ROAD FRONT TREES 58.00 348.00 7.00 YARDS WOOD CHIPS 35.00 245.00 22.00 SQ FT BOULDER WALL 19.50 429.00 ACCEPTED BY: Subtotal 10,756.00 Sales Tax ®®inn, LEC 525 15th Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: (962)949-3630 October 10, 2013 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Mound, MN 55364 Attn: Sarah Smith Dear Sarah: The grading contractor on site at Woodlyn Ridge, Terry Bros., Inc, has completed 100% of the grading work on site. This letter is to request that the City release in full the Grading Plan Security ($10,000.00). The landscaping contractor on site has completed 50% of the landscaping, as listed on the approved landscape plan. This letter is also to request that the City reduce the Landscaping Plan Security from $24,625.00 to $12,312.50. Please let me know if you need any further information regarding these securities Thank you, Stephen A. Bona Woodlyn, LLC W. .. Us MARKELL - IA13EREE DESIGN GROUP IS �AV dFaL WIRMK+i PK AWFAasu FAY:�M m j irsyaahamt A..rA.r%.. y gA YIII[9!i} qWM AK10ffA.TaiVYn �Ib11111f()G ®Y twA1Wi de< IYS11C ' a BMW" Glow 201 E Lab Boats wsyop, w w"1 AII AMftlN /AIXIP 11 art t iL C !— 1_ rAleue�. w ® l w2 n.vaom i 5Z o a BMW" Glow 201 E Lab Boats wsyop, w w"1 AII AMftlN /AIXIP 11 art t iL C !— 1_ rAleue�. w ® l w2 n.vaom i 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: November 6, 2013 SUBJECT: Street Vacation Application APPLICANT: Kent Friedrichsen PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 13 -28 ZONING: R- 2 Single and Two Family Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential SUMMARY At its November 12, 2013 meeting, the City Council will hold a public hearing to review an application submitted by Kent Friedrichsen requesting vacation of certain portions of unimproved Hullett Avenue that abut PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086 and PID No. 23- 117- 24 -42- 0079 , which he owns, both of which are former tax forfeit parcels, and PID No. 23- 117- 24 -42- 0080 which Mr. Friedrichsen purchased on August 15, 2013. This lot is located immediately north of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079. Mr. Friedrichsen also owns the property at 5913 Fairfield Road which is located immediately east of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086. The vacation request includes the road portion located within the intersections of unimproved Hullett Avenue and Fairfield Road. As part of the requested vacation, the applicant prepared a preliminary layout to demonstrate what a possible subdivision in the area could look like if the affected streets were vacated. This layout was provided as supplemental information only. A formal application for subdivision was not submitted. Details regarding the vacation application are contained in Planning Report No. 13 -28, the vacation application and supporting materials. Copies have been included as attachments to this report. PROCESS Minnesota State Statutes Section 412.851 states that a statutory city may abandon ownership or control over all or any part of the land they have set aside, dedicated or used as streets or alleys and further states that a City Council may initiate the action by resolution or by the submission of a petition by a majority of the landowners and the owners of at least 50 percent of the land area. State law also states that no vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so after a properly notice hearing. Procedurally, state statute requires that the City Council must hold a public hearing on the proposal following two weeks of published notice and mailed notice to affected property owners a minimum of ten (10) days prior to the hearing. Mailed notice was sent on October 30, 2013 to all property owners per Hennepin County tax records that are within tho Minnesota Baptist Assembly original plat. -2451- All required notification activities have been satisfied. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its October 1, 2013 meeting. Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the vacation application, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff. A copy of the 10 -1 -2013 Planning Commission meeting minute excerpts has been included as an attachment. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1. As mentioned in the Planning Report, the vacation and supporting materials were forwarded to private utility companies for review on September 6, 2013. The applicant also had preliminary contact with the utility companies regarding the proposed vacation and proposed concept /sketch plan. Members are advised that the notice of public hearing and supporting materials were sent to private utilities on October 28, 2013. A summary of the utility comments is provided below: - Refer to "UTILITIES SECTION" in the Planning Report which includes comments from Bonnie Anderson from Excel Energy and Steve Storo of Frontier Communications. A letter was received from Chuck Mayer from CenterPoint Energy on October 31, 2013 and stated that they do not natural gas mains or services in the proposed vacation areas. CenterPoint Energy has no objections to the vacation request. A copy of the 10 -30 -2013 letter has been included as an attachment to the Executive Summary. 2. The vacation application was not signed by a majority of the owners of land abutting the roads proposed to be vacated, therefore, the application does not qualify as a petition per M.S. 412.851. This majority requirement has been interpreted to mean an actual majority of the total number of abutting property owners and is not calculated based on the majority of the land based on size. When there has been no petition, a resolution to vacate may be only be adopted by a vote of four - fifths of all members of the City Council 3. Members are advised that Staff has received two (2) calls about the public hearing regarding the street vacation. One individual wanted to know the location of the proposed street vacation and the other individual had interest in the street vacation process for another unimproved road. REQUESTED ACTION A draft resolution, based on the Planning Commission's recommendation, has been included for consideration and action by the City Council. -2452- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13- RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NO. 13 -28 WHEREAS, the applicant, Kent Friedrichsen, submitted an application requesting vacation of certain portions of unimproved Hullett Avenue that abuts PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086, PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 and No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080 which he owns; and WHEREAS, the applicant also owns the property at 5913 Fairfield Road which is located immediately east of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086; and WHEREAS, the vacation request also includes the unimproved road portion located within the intersections of unimproved Hullett Avenue and Fairfield Road; and WHEREAS, as part of the requested street vacation, the applicant prepared a preliminary layout, which was provided as supplemental information, to demonstrate what a possible subdivision in the area could look like if the affected streets were vacated; and WHEREAS, there are no public utilities affected by the street vacation request; and WHEREAS, private utility companies were notified of the street vacation request and no objections were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the vacation request at its October 1, 2013 meeting and voted to recommend to the City Council that the vacation request be approved subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, the City Council of Mound held a public hearing on the street vacation request on November 12, 2013 and provided proper notice thereof pursuant to state law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the vacation request taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances and other official controls; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that the requested vacation is in the interest of the public as there no municipal utilities located on the subject property and the City has no future plans for its improvement as a public street; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the vacation request taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances and other official controls; and -2453- WHEREAS, there are no municipal or private utilities located on the subject property. The City has no future plans for improving the property for a public street or other public use and would prefer that the land fully utilized; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The requested vacation is in the interest of the public. 2. The City does hereby approve the easement vacation request subject to the following conditions: A. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the vacation application. B. Applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. C. The applicant shall record a notice of the completion of the proceedings, to be prepared by the City Clerk or designee, with Hennepin County. Applicant is advised that said notice will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 3. This street vacation request is approved for the following described property: All that part of Hullett Avenue lying westerly of and adjacent to that part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Block 7, together with all that part of the unnamed street lying southerly of said Block 7 and westerly of Lot 11, Block 8, said MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, including that portion within the intersections of said Hullett Avenue and the unnamed street. All that part of Hulett Avenue lying westerly of and adjacent to that part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Block 7, together with all that part of the south half of Fairfield Road lying westerly of the northerly extension of the west line of said Block 7, including that portion within the intersections of said Hulett Avenue and Fairfield Road. Adopted this 12th day of November, 2013 Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk 2454- Mark Hanus, Mayor MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1, 2013 Chair Ward called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, George Linkert, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert and Councilmember Mark Wegscheid. Members absent: David Goode, Cynthia Penner. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Joe Jezierski, Jr (4431 Lamberton Rd); Gary & Cec Meister (5125 Windsor Rd); Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Jim Brunzell (5111 Windsor Rd); Mike Werth (5116 Waterbury Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Street Vacation Application 5913 Fairfield Road Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen Smith introduced the application. The applicant wishes to vacate the undeveloped Hullett Avenue that lies west and south of his property. Smith indicated that the applicant provided a future plan for a 3 lot subdivision, which is not under consideration at this time. Staff recommends approval of the vacation. The area is not currently maintained by the city and would appear to be a better use if vacated. Retterath stated that it is understood that the applicant has not been given any promise of future approvals. Linkert asked about the small little cutout at Fairfield. Smith said that Public Works recommended inclusion in this request. Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd) reaffirmed where the city property and wetlands were located. He suggested that the rest of Hullett Avenue be vacated to the north. He has contacted all of his neighbors and the expense to participate was prohibitive. Discussion Retterath is happy to see this development take place. -2455- Matt VanNelson (2925 Meadow Lane) asked if Leach were developed past Meadow, who would get charged for development of the road. Smith indicated that it would likely be a developer cost. Friedrichsen — Have talked with staff regarding whether Fairfield Road would be private or public and who would bear the cost of construction. Staff has indicated it would likely be the developers cost to install. Friedrichsen thinks that the Fairfield portion of the road constructed should be maintained by the City once it is constructed. Staff noted that further discussion would be needed once a subdivision has been proposed. Retterath stated that if Hullett north of Fairfield were proposed to be vacated he wouldn't pursue vacation because of the added square footage and that the assessed value may rise. Linkert thought it was too bad we missed the opportunity to make a connection between Fairfield and Idlewood to improve the accessibility of the park to a greater area. MOTION by Linkert, second by Retterath, to recommend approval with staff recommendations and conditions. MOTION approved unanimously. -2456- IME 'r October 31, 2013 Sarah Smith Community Development Director 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Proposed Street Vacation Application Dear Ms. Smith: 700 West Linden Avenue PO Box 1165 Minneapolis, MN 55440-1165 With reference to your request, CenterPoint Energy has no natural gas mains or services in the proposed Vacation Street area; CenterPoint Energy has no objection to the proposed Vacation. If you have any questions, please contact me at 612- 321 -5381. Respectfully, CENTERPOINT ENERGY Chuck Mayers Right -of -Way Specialist Engineering Services charles.mayers@centerpointenergy.com 612 - 321 -5381 -2457- October 30, 2013 Dear Property Owner, 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com As part of its Tuesday, November 12, 2013 regular meeting, to be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the Centennial Building (former City Hall), 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN, the Mound City Council will hold a public hearing for review of a request from Kent Friedrichsen to vacate unimproved streets, or portions thereof, in the MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY original plat. Residents are advised that a Sketch Plan -Major Subdivision application was not submitted. However, the applicant did submit a preliminary concept plan with the vacation application, as supplemental information, to demonstrate what a possible subdivision of the subject area ( which includes the proposed vacated streets) could look like. As your property is located in the MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY original plat, you are receiving an official public notice about the upcoming public hearing for review of the requested street vacation application, at which time formal public comment will be taken. if you have any questions regarding this letter or information contained herein including the upcoming public hearing, please feel free to contact me by telephone at 952.472.0604 or by email at Sarahsmith @cityofmound.com. Since G J ® �J Sarah Smith, Community Development Director -2458 - printed on recycled paper CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER STREET VACATIONS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, will meet on Tuesday, November 12, 2013 at 7:00 PM, or as soon as possible thereafter in the Council Chambers in the Centennial Building (former City Hall building) at 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN to hold a public hearing to consider a request from Kent Friedrichsen for vacation of the following unimproved streets or portions thereof: All that part of Hullett Avenue lying westerly of and adjacent to that part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Block 7, together with all that part of the unnamed street lying southerly of said Block 7 and westerly of Lot 11, Block 8, said MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, including that portion within the intersections of said Hullett Avenue and the unnamed street. All that part of Hullett Avenue lying westerly of and adjacent to that part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Block 7, together with all that part of the south half of Fairfield Road lying westerly of the northerly extension of the west line of said Block 7, including that portion within the intersections of said Hullett Avenue and Fairfield Road. Copies of the application and related materials are available for viewing at Mound City Offices or upon request. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above matter will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Jill Norlander Planning and Inspections Administrative Assistant Posted: October 22, 2013 Published in the Laker on October 26, 2013 and November 2, 2013 -2459- PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 26, 2013 SUBJECT: Street Vacation Application APPLICANT: Kent Friedrichsen PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 13 -28 ZONING: R- 2 Single and Two Family Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential SUMMARY The Planning Commission will review an application submitted by Kent Friedrichsen on August 16, 2013 requesting vacation of certain portions of unimproved Hullett Avenue that abut PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086 and PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 which he owns and are both former tax forfeit parcels. He recently purchased PID No. 23- 117- 24 -42- 0080 on August 15, 2013. This lot is located immediately north of PID No. 23- 117- 24 -42- 0079. Mr. Friedrichsen also owns the property at 5913 Fairfield Road which is located immediately east of PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086. As part of the requested vacation, the applicant prepared a preliminary layout, to demonstrate what a possible subdivision in the area could look like if the affected streets were vacated. This layout was provided as supplemental information only. A formal application for subdivision has not yet been submitted. PROCESS Minnesota State Statutes Section 412.851 states that a statutory city may abandon ownership or control over all or any part of the land they have set aside, dedicated or used as streets or alleys and further states that a City Council may initiate the action by resolution or by the submission of a petition by a majority of the landowners and the owners of at least 50 percent of the land area. Procedurally, state statute requires that the City Council must hold a public hearing on the proposal following two weeks of published notice and posted notice. The City must also provide written notice to each affected owner at least (10) days before the public hearing. As of this date, no City Council public hearing has been set and will be scheduled following review and recommendation by the Planning Commission. _' • 1 DISCUSSION 1. Vacation applications are not subject to the regulations contained in Minnesota Statutes 15.99 related to timelines for public agency action of a land use application. 2. When a city vacates a street, the involved portion of the public right -of -way is split 50 -50, (presumably to the centerline) to the abutting owner(s) and is usually free of easements either in favor of the public or owners of other property abutting the street. State statute allows that a City may specify the extent to which a proposed vacation affects existing utility easements, including the right to maintain and continue existing utility easements. If the public right of way was originally dedicated within one plat, the entire dedication reverts to the abutting property owner(s) within that plat. In the case of the requested portion of unimproved Hullett Avenue, the ROW reverts to the property owners on the east and north sides as the subject road to be vacated was included in the original plat of Minnesota Baptist Summer Assembly. 3. Planning Commission members are advised that a Sketch Plan-Major Subdivison Application was not submitted. However, the applicant provided a preliminary concept plan with the vacation application as supplemental information to demonstrate what a future proposed subdivision of the subject area could look like. 5. PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086 is a former tax forfeit lot and per City Resolution No. 10 -54 dated 8 -11 -2010, the Council approved classification as Non - Conservation and authorized release to adjacent owners. PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 is a former tax forfeit lot and per City Resolution No. 13 -14 dated 1 -23 -2013, the Council approved classification as Non Conservation and requested it be combined with PID No. 23- 117 -24 -0079, which was previously authorized for release, and offered for public auction. Both of these parcels were purchased from Hennepin County by the applicant on May 20, 2013. Per information provided by the applicant, the lots were sold at a neighbors only auction and no other neighbors showed up to bid. As stated earlier in the report, the applicant also recently purchased PID No. 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080. 6. The south portion of the platted street (Leach Lane) in the vicinity of the former tax forfeit parcels was previously vacated. The north potion of Leach Lane, located on the south side of Fairfield Road, is open but not improved. -2461- The Planning Commission may wish to discuss inclusion of the portion of unimproved Fairfield Road (south half) as requested. The Public Works Director suggested it be included. 8. The applicant has been advised that a future subdivision application would need to be processed as a Major Subdivision as the preliminary configuration does not qualify as a Minor Subdivision due to the need for public improvements pursuant to City Code Sect. 121 -35. Staff notes that a variance and /or conditional use permit approval could be required depending upon the future design submitted and its conformity with Sec. 121 (subdivision) and 129 (zoning) of the City Code Staff suggests a possible option to be evaluated is a Planned development area (PDA) as described in Sec. 129 -195 of the City Code. A PDA project is approved by conditional use. DEPARTMENT AND CONSULTANT REVIEW Copies of the application were forwarded to all City departments for review. Comments received as of September 26, 2013 are summarized below: City Attorney Melissa Manderschied The petition the applicant submitted doesn't appear to meet the statutory requirement for vacation by petition of the majority of the abutting land owners per MS 412.851. When there has been no petition, the vacation resolution may be adopted only by a vote of four -fifths of all members of the council after properly noticed hearing per MS 412.851. Per statute, no vacation shall be made unless it appears in the interest of the public to do so. City Manager Kandis Hanson Supports application as possible vacation of the involved street(s) will allow for some new development in the area which includes two former tax forfeit parcels. Public Works Director Carlton Moore There are no public utilities in the subject road(s) to be vacated. I support the requested vacation application. Fire Chief Greg Peterson 1 have reviewed the proposal and there are no apparent fire code issues. PUBLIC AGENCY REVIEW A copy of the application and related materials were forwarded to involved agencies for review and comment. Comments received as of September 26, 2013 are summarized below: MnDNR Acquisition and Development Specialist Paul Purman Thank you for notice. No comments from me on this application. No concerns. -- -2462- UTILITIES REVIEW Copies of the vacation application materials were forwarded to the private utility companies. Written comments were requested in advance of September 25, 2013. Comments received are summarized below. Steve Storo, Frontier Communications Refer to email response included as an attachment to the report. It is important to mention that the applicant has had preliminary discussions with the private utility companies regarding the vacation request. Bonnie Anderson, Excel Energy Refer to letter dated 9 -26 -2013 that has been included an attachment to the report. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the vacation application subject to the following minimum conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution at Hennepin County unless applicant directs the City to record the easement with all involved recording fees to be taken out of the escrow account. The escrow account must be in good standing for the City to undertake the recording. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the vacation application. 3. Applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 4. The applicant shall record a Notice of the Completion of the proceedings, to be prepared by the City Clerk or designee, with Hennepin County. Applicant is advised that said notice will not be released for recording until all conditions in the Resolution and Notice of Completion been met. 5. In the event there are private utilities within the subject area(s) to be vacated which were not shown on the application and supporting materials, an easement on each side of the utility, the size of which shall be determined by the Public Works Director, shall be preserved so as to allow for maintenance and repair or must be relocated at the owner's expense. -2463- Dear City of Mound, 08/16/2013 All adjacent property owners on Meadow Avenue that touch Hullett Avenue were contacted by myself and Probe Engineering and asked if they wished to be a part of having all of Hullett Avenue vacated they initially indicated yes, but when the cost was for each home owner for the survey and vacate write up was provide at $1,850 a piece by Probe Engineering and there is no guarantee the City will vacate the land they the owners did not have the current capacity at this time to come up with the extra funds at this time to participate although they indicate they were still interested in seeing Hullett Avenue vacated at some point. Mr. & Mrs. Torgeson Mr & Mrs. Smith New Construction neighbors Mr. & Mrs. Van Nelson, Sincerely, Kent Friedrichsen 5913 Fairfield Road Mound, MN 55364 952- 334 -8390 ke ntfriedrichsen 2yahoo.com -- -2464- P. CITY_ O,�F MOUNrtL 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952472 -0600 Fax 952472 -0620 a :j :111 A, Application Fe g and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date /J ,��J77 Case No./ a City Council Date Please Woe or ormt clearly APPLICANT Name Kent F'riedricrksen Email KerAFriedriclxsert@ s4alwo,con Address -91-3 rQirt;-e I a Phone (Herne) i�9 ^,(-A (Work) > 4�h..�. (Cell) 9 Sz -33V -8340 f (eR- � E -Mail Address m, 'An Fax Adjacent Address U rl Q S S l5�, n.ed Name of Business ADJACENT PROPERTY (APPLICANT'S Lot un- nurrebe - ,- ed Block_ .... 7 PROPERTY) subdivision MnReS 4 n�1 ft - zu- 4z =De8r5 . M'+er riffeh�Lr PIO# 2'S -117 -24 -42 -0079 ZONING DISTRICT Circle: R -1 R-2 R -3 5-1 B-2 B-3 AREA 5 e l ec3cLk Decr;g;an o� Fraposeci VcLcoLkfort TO BE s�cwc'� �r1 S.�rVQv VACATED REASON q / PSS��le i�P�ulvan irrLLa T �u�'C 1,T FOR REQUEST IS THERE A PUBLIC / /VO �xisf irg .�j7 1 eraJg� r 5 un rnv�veJ w� NEED er neeO/ eo FOR THIS �./e,t3 LAND? I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that 1 am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this a lic do Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature Date Vacation Information (11/4/2011) Page 4 of 4 -61- -2465- 62 o� voa Z ( EXISTING t10U5E CA #5907 3.90,5£.105 1- :'� snw,rvw,e aoaeos p mp 0 �U' I (9 I 62 �W N Oin � Asa 2 G W II O U p J � W W � Q W L) u,i a k6 iom ° 0 a F m vW pp n O m^ 1 ' � W rp C) _ F o_ on "- ( a31VOVW $ " 3nNIAV N3V9I 3nN3WV NOV91 w LL 3 90 S£. LOS `O - - _ _ ct 3 W p j Q vM LL 3 „OZ,Sbi00N yz «v LL a3 Z 60Y0 96'9L1 69'56 O P m 031tl91+A o 3Q Oi - W ."� o� U'Zt 3 „OZ,S4.00N 0 p Z � 60 3nN]AV uallnu 0 � I- 2 G W II O U p O � W W Q W w Z k6 n 0 MOZZ 3 „OZ,9b.00N a o a r$= _ 215” s N i�, 1$ ig ova u # aE m�uc z° ^�5 z X50, ENO¢' -M >o� "z yk3p�� wA ° N. m sEm T'"G@ Hm ¢gz r `” =o e f §Em ESE Ef”, g °y6 m� =- " m'o9 63 Z o=mym -` °a amEO �gE �W . Zm a � q{oi, ooga mTo mo- _. ;:2466 -5 q� �W zapa NK a wU' Assga�= mis�am$ n�35a9° n�f. v5 q gE =grmv � sv u5= = s5 g osu.r-os ;oux�P� Th ug 0 mW OEo"3 cWO § =o$ U aa=i ap §'mv mw ss p �=arvESa °E aNUnE¢9 O t il sg fr 0 m oL s r coa o °s °a rOT p �.b J aQ= y N °~ J of � tl u■ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 6, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 2, Block 8; the westerly half of Lot 7, Block 8 and that part of Lot 11, Block 8 lying between the westerly line of said Lot 6 and the easterly line of the westerly half of said Lot 7 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lot 5, Block 8, and that part of Lot 11, Block 8, lying westerly of the easterly line of said Lot 5 extended south across said Lot 11, all in MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including that part of vacated Leach Avenue lying adjacent to said Lot 5. That part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Block 7, including that part of vacated Leach Avenue lying adjacent to the above described part of Block 7. That part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Block 7. PROPOSED VACATION DESCRIPTION All that part of Hullett Avenue lying westerly of and adjacent to that part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies southerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast comer of said Block 7, together with all that part of the unnamed street lying southerly of said Block 7 and westerly of Lot 11, Block 8, said MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, including that portion within the intersections of said Hullett Avenue and the unnamed street. All that part of Hullett Avenue lying westerly of and adjacent to that part of Block 7, MINNESOTA BAPTIST SUMMER ASSEMBLY, according to the recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of a line drawn parallel with the south line of said Block 7 from a point on the east line thereof 96.00 feet north from the southeast corner of said Block 7, together with all that part of the south half of Fairfield Road lying westerly of the northerly extension of the west line of said Block 7, including that portion within the intersections of said Hullett Avenue and Fairfield Road. - -2467- CP -- -� o --- - --- - - -- - --7 j J i Q 0 U N M Lei p O w W w i • au O � p a d CO Jv AS 3 nz M O c � I - J w � YQ m p' 1 AS I Z v 0 U N M Lei p O w W w i W F w 'o N 6 Y a -t I I L�J ut bz s M o N IO N LL � � i N LL � u u LL � s �in0 � II II II m J -�N ss Ln L s I p J AS � I r w � YQ m p' 1 AS I 'b£ -------------- $8 I I 6t °•� I I s I bz s M o N IO N LL � � i N LL � u u LL � s �in0 � II II II m J -�N ss Ln Hennepin County 61S - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 Property Map F�rcel j Map Scale: T' = 200 ft. N 23- 117 -24 -42 -0086 A -T -B: Abstract 1\ D: /� �. j Print Date: 8/26/2013 Owner Kent Friedrichsen Market $0 Name: Total: Parcel 85 Address Unassigned Tax $0.00 f Address: Mound, MN 00000 Total: (Payable: 2013) j Property Type: Vacant Land - Residential Sale Price: $23,040 + This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no '. Home- Non- Homestead Sale 09/2006 representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular Stead: Date: purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.23 acres Sale Vacant Land COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 Area: 10,156 sq ft Code: i ^'vrtrtserr? -2469- http: / /gis.co.hennepin.mn.us /Property /print/d, At.aspx ?C= 446800.18134555535,4974899... 8/26/2013 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map I R Page I of I Parcel j Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 23- 117 -24 -42 -0079 A -T -B: Abstract Print Date: 8/28/2013 Kent E Friedrichsen M ct eh $0 Namer Parcel 85 Address Unassigned Tax $0.00 Address: Mound, MN 00000 Total: (Payable: 2013) Property Vacant Land - Residential Sale $2 000 Type; Price: This map is a compilation of data from various } sources and is furnished "AS IS' with no Home- Sale j representation or warranty expressed or Non - Homestead Date: 08/2003 implied, including fitness of any particular stead: purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and I completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.11 acres Sale Vacant Land € COPYRIGHT 0 HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 Area: 4,705 sgft Code: ^^ 2470 http: / /gis.co.hennepin.mn.us /Property / print / default. aspx? C = 446800.81634682533,4974897... 8/26/2013 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 Property Map Parcel 117 -24 -42 -0082 A -T -B: Abstract Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N j `' (, Print Date: 8/2612013 - -�23- Owner K E Friedrichsen Market $154,000 Name: Total: Parcel 5913 Fairfield Rd Tax $2,339.98 Address: Mound, MN 55364 Total: (Payable: 2013) Property Residential Sale $120,585 Type: Price: I This map is a compilation of data from various ( sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Homestead Sale 07/1995 i representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular stead: Date: II i purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.25 acres Sale Area: 10,721 sq ft Code: I COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 -2471- http: / /gis.co.hennepin.mn.us /Propertylprintldefault.aspx ?C= 446800.81634682533,4974897... 8/26/2013 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 Pafcei +Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. ID: 23- 117 -24 -42 -0080 ?, A -T•B: Torcens . Print Date: 9/27/2013 0 or Kent Friedrichsen Market $2,000 Name: Total: Parcel 85 Address Unassigned Tax $37.00 Address: Mound, MN 00000 Total: { (Payable: 2013) Property Vacant Land - Residential Sale 000 Type: PrICe: Price: ;This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Non - Homestead Sale 08/P013 representation or warranty expressed or I stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and { completeness of the information shown. Parcel Area: 0.07 acres 2,900 sq ft Sale Code: Vacant Land COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 ThmF, Green! -2472- http: / /gis.co. hennepin .mn.us /Propertylprintldefault. aspx ?C= 446752.92055000085,4974922... 9/27/2013 0 V _J a� l V 7. 0 V \) 0 v t ,.t Z �i g6 r £•F `9 sbs•� is SH'r 5E N, W yr W � os v �i r rof b b se ss r � - o 9 -7/A d - ---- rt ty C N C orb i CR G G -Q t � 11370! —/ o f �/ib' 1 �� - fr�s_ p a" � o o aui7 . M /a / /��uo •f�F s 0 D � o� a �ny70N 1 h �J 07 -7 o o'v2' -- o ° 7 Q h 0 W � �2 d of 9596 n g'09 E 3 vnt Qr, h JQ v� Q U V v y °� oar h I c a � L '� � � Q Q� � •C h � _)i m rz O� �C ZQ yb h- •, °��0 0 'h oSoVj lD C 0 0 IZ '37) ° ti �� a¢y��a c C � ts, C C 4zi W V J p 0•C `� Ali 0 4C 0 -r3 h Q v 0 V o C Oh� C .y 0 o e. 0.� o 0 Q� ��x -z 3t "4 0 d op 0• O 0 tj � o ;� o•o,` o v u�� v e �I Qti:k C ZZ o V' C p hx ) 'ju o °jvr�� "�h i ti 0 Q �gg l CO l cz a Z o' C o v��ti -2473 - v �i r rof b b se ss r r` - 9 -7/A d - ---- rt ty C N C CR G G -Q t � 11370! —/ o f �/ib' 1 �� - fr�s_ p a" � o o aui7 . M /a / /��uo •f�F s - a 3 vnt Qr, h JQ v� Q U V v y °� oar h I c a � L '� � � Q Q� � •C h � _)i m rz O� �C ZQ yb h- •, °��0 0 'h oSoVj lD C 0 0 IZ '37) ° ti �� a¢y��a c C � ts, C C 4zi W V J p 0•C `� Ali 0 4C 0 -r3 h Q v 0 V o C Oh� C .y 0 o e. 0.� o 0 Q� ��x -z 3t "4 0 d op 0• O 0 tj � o ;� o•o,` o v u�� v e �I Qti:k C ZZ o V' C p hx ) 'ju o °jvr�� "�h i ti 0 Q �gg l CO l cz a Z o' C o v��ti -2473 - Sarah Smith From: Storo, Steven [Steven.Storo @ftr.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:18 PM To: Sarah Smith Subject: FW: Request for Review and Comments - Street Vacation Application in City of Mound Attachments: KMBT20020130906080408.pdf Hello Sarah, Frontier only has an aerial 12 pair copper cable on the south side of Fairfield Rd. W MOND T D7 -17- Please call with any questions. Thanks, Steven Storo Network Engineer — Transmission/OSP steven.storo@fLr.com frontier 12378 Wilshire Blvd. IMound, MN. 55364 (952) 491 -5557 J ❑ (952) 472 -1429 -2474- A7 -411 T D7-4C Xce/Energy NORTHERN STATES POWER 414 NICOLLET MALL. MP -7B MWNEAPOLIS. MN 55401 September 26, 2013 Sarah Smith Mound Community Development 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re; Proposed Vacation Kent Fredrickson 5913 Fairfield Road File 2013.669 Dear Sarah I am writing in response that Xcel Energy submit comments regarding the above referenced vacation. Please be advised the Xcel Energy has no objection to said vacation, provided, however that an easement be reserved for the existing power line running through the proposed vacation area. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie Anderson Land Rights Agent 612- 330 -6241 Bonniej.anderson@ xcelenergy.com - Z.J75,f 1 Septe.ber 9, 2013 .,Y MOU NAYbyOpD ROAD ND, MN 55364.7687 PN. (952) 472 FAX. (952) 472 600 Kent Friedrichsen WEB. VVWW,C7ty0fM0 d -00M 5913 Fairfield Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: Determination of Completeness — Determination of Street (s) — fsl Vacation This letter ' Concept /Sketch Plan 16, 2013. is of to the vacation a n Based on application that deemed to be co Staff s review at was received Staff res replete for review the was materials pectfuil °n °r around August y offers the following regards to the the application 1 g comments: prOPosed vacation request, been The application was quest, roads proposed to not signed by a majority Petition e per M.S 412e vaca Td, therefore the f the owners of land abutting an actual 851' his majorit application do g the not calculated l majority of the Y requirement es not qualify based on total number ant has been interpreted a been no Petition, he majority of the of abutting Property rated to four-fifths n a resolution to vacate land based y °nears fths o {ail members on size, when and is made unless it a of the Ci may only be ad there has appears ty Council. p opted by a vote of preceded b in the interest of the er statute alley, pub►icy two weeks published public to do Sono vacation shall be any public water, grounds, public way, oaan Posted notice. In additier a hearing no vacation shall y Part thereof °n' if the street a proposed resolution is s all be made terminates at or Natural Resour unless written abuts upon ces at least 60 served by certified mail notice of is for no days before upon the Co the Petition the Co n Purposes onl a the hearing on the mmissioner o f mmissioner Of Natural Ry and does not Resources. create a right matter' The notice 2' Vacation Of intervention b Statutes applications are 15.99 related a not subject to the regulations application. to timelines for public contained in agency action 3' Additional inf or Of land use for oration i e roads s respectfully re to be retained. quested that there is no public benefit -2476- Punted on iecYC /eN �...._. September 9, 2013 Kent Friedrichsen 4. Attendance by an applicant, or designated representative, will be required at all future Planning Commission meetings and City Council public hearing dates. 5. The vacation application is subject to Staff, consultant, public agency and /or private utility comments. Therefore, additional comments, questions and /or requests for information may come up as part of the future Planning Report preparation process. With regard to the concept /sketch plan that was submitted for informal review that includes the proposed roads to be vacated, the following comments are offered: 1. No subdivision application or fees were submitted. Therefore, the application is hereby deemed to be incomplete for review. 2. The zoning of the subject property is R -2 Single and Two Family Residential pursuant to the regulations contained in City Code Sec. 129 -102. 3. The future land use plan included in the Comprehensive Plan guides the subject area for low density residential use. 4. It is anticipated that any future proposed subdivision will be processed as a Major Subdivision as the subject lots do not meet the qualifications of a Minor Subdivision pursuant to City Code Sect. 121 -35. At a minimum, it is anticipated that variance and /or conditional use permit approval will be required as part of any future subdivision due to lack of frontage on an improved public street; also minimum lot frontage. There could be other issues as well. If you have any questions or information contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me by telephone at 952.472.0604 or by email at Sarahsmith(&Citvofmound com. Sincere , ara r mith Community Development Director -2477- Page 2 Kent Friedrichsen 5913 Fairfield Road Mound, MN 55364 September 17, 2013 Attn: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 -1687 This letter is in regard to the vacation application that was received on or around August 16, 2013 by the City of Mound from myself the applicant and the response letter from the City of Mound reviewed based on Staff's review of the submitted materials, of the application and additional information requested in the letter dated September 9, 2013 RE: Determination of Completeness- Street(s) Vacation Application and Determination of Completeness — Concept/Sketch Plan from Community Development Director, Sarah Smith. The City of Mound Staff has confirmed the Vacation Request Application has been reviewed and Deemed complete. With regards to the proposed vacation. request, Staff respectfully offers the following comments. Applicant's response to comments to City of Mound Determination of Completeness — Street(s) Vacation Application, Determination of Completeness — Concept /Sketch Plan letter dated September 9, 2013. Responses. 1. 1 am the only applicant on this specific request and it was not intended as a petition per M.S. 411851. 1 was made aware that the City was not responsible for collecting the costs from abutting neighbors who would benefit by gaining land, but that I would be on the hook to pay - and collect from them. This is an expensive and there is collection risk for work done I am not willing to afford and pursue on their behalf. On July 17, 2013 in a second meeting with the city to go over the vacate application for completeness and city input. I along Ray Baylor a local - building contractor and fellow citizen of Mound, attended a meeting with Carleton at 9:15 A.M. (Sarah Smith was out the office this week). Here the vacate request and concept plan were reviewed and confirmed with the city indicated where would be the best line along Fairfield Road (Unimproved) etc. extend the vacate request too, so I could have Probe Engineering -2478- complete the vacate write up correctly as the city suggested it should be done as it takes a great deal of time and money to get the vacate description written correctly. During this meeting it was mentioned that it would be good to contact the abutting neighbors of Hullett Avenue Unimproved to see if they were interested in being part of my vacate request to be pro - active to request the whole road be vacated, I have contacted the three abutting neighbors of Hullett - - Avenue Unimproved and indicated I was putting in a vacation request for part of Hullett Avenue - Unimproved and if they were interested I would have the same surveying company 1 used to contact them to discuss cost of land survey and vacate request for each owner. I would cover the application fee and escrow fee for all parties on a single request, See my neighbor comment letter attached to original vacation application. I did this at this City of Mound Staff request and agreed it would be a good idea. I delayed my vacation request request to possibly include them along with my application for over a month. I think in after meeting with the City that the request to have entire Hullett Avenue Unimproved would be in the public's best interest along with my request as well as it would remove a road to nowhere as far as any residential or commercial use and would clean up the plat and put the property on the tax rolls and be maintained by the residents as it is has not been maintained by the city for years and could be considered a liability as the Hullett Avenue Unimproved has widow makers on it, dead - trees and branches, residents use it to dump brush, logs, trees, garbage(beer cans, bottles household waste and plastic, excess construction materials such as old fencing, concrete, patio - - and bricks, wire and at one time there was a mattress hidden in the woods. Or the portion of Hullett Ave nue Unimproved north of Fairfield Road Unimproved should become part of the land owned by the city and maintained to reduced liability to the City from a lawsuit caused by property that is not maintained on a regular basis, but the cities property is located on another plat. According to the City Staff if Hullett Avenue Unimproved was vacated it would go to the owners abutting the property to the east on the same plat. I have lived here since 1995 purchasing a new house in mound and the neighborhood housing stock has been upgraded and is being maintained except for couple of properties that could use some TLC, With other new houses being built also in the neighborhood I see a demand for the area and desire to live in the City of Mound using low impact housing. This only enhances the community. 2. Agree 3. The property included in the vacation request is not currently maintained by the city and has not been to my knowledge since I have lived here for since 1995 and longer per neighbors. The Request - to vacate property VAC3791826 ID is and old alley way that extended at one time farther down the block behind the properties located on the south sided of Fairfield Road. They were all vacated according to my research in the past except for this one remaining piece. When I asked the City of Mound Staff why it had not been vacated as the rest of the alley had been over time, no one could remember why since it was so long ago. Vacating this piece of property is in the public's best interest as it is had been encroached upon by neighbors as their own and used as a place to store things, have fires, and dump leaves and brush, building materials to my knowledge in the past and current, Pictures attached. The property consists of Creepy Charlie considered a noxious weed which spreads to -, „- -2479- neighboring landowners impacting their yards and raising their landscaping and yard maintenance and chemicals into the ground water. As far along with my remaining request for Hullett Avenue Unimproved and small piece of Fairfield Road Unimproved. The city does not maintain this property in the public's interest and one could consider it creates a potential liability as the property violates the cities own and or state code Chapter 42 which defines, prevent and abate nuisances. Issues pertaining to vacated request property Highlighted in Bold. Chapter 42 NUISANCES* *State law reference—Authority, to define, prevent and abate nuisances, Minn. Slats. § 412.221, solid. 23. Sec. 42 -1. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Public nuisance means whoever by his act or failure to perform a legal duty intentionally does any of the following is guilty of maintaining a public nuisance, which is a misdemeanor: (1) Maintains or permits a condition which unreasonably annoys, injures, or endangers the safety, health, morals, comfort, or repose of any considerable number of members of the public; (2) Interferes with, obstructs, or renders dangerous for passage, any public highway or right -of- way, or waters used by the public; or (3) Is guilty of any other act or omission declared by law or this chapter to be a public nuisance and for which no sentence is specifically provided. (Code 1987, § 1000.01) Sec. 42 -2. Public nuisances — Affecting health. The following are hereby declared to be public nuisances affecting health: (1) Carcasses of animals not buried or destroyed within 24 hours after death; Have seen dead vermin and raccoons and sometimes birds on the property. Vermin within last mouth don't have picture. (2) (3) All public exposure of persons having a communicable disease as defined in Minn. Stats. § 144.4172 and any building, conveyance, or place where contagion, infection, filth or other source or cause of communicable disease exists; �:1 Corner of lot. 09172013 it South East -2481- Ere row clinicni on scale 113 3791826 lo bN neighbor on ldlewood Road. NN heel barrels and some other toots on this propertx slightly -. Southwest Corner of lot, 09112013 -2482- West propert} line of 5921 Fairfield Road and Past property line of Undeveloped Leach .A,tnue deck was not built by current owner, but 2 owner, back both this permanent detached deck less than 4 feet from property lint closer to a foot or less. Is this legal? Or code complianO Did the Cith approve this? Looks to be encroaching on I indeceloped Ixacb Avenue right of way or ton dose to side yard property line. Stake in picture is in southwest corner. 0917206 -2483- U9172UIJ Tree Limb down on 2lulletl AN tout Undeveloped towards south end came oft of tree lacks like it Naas knocked off by new construction on adjoining lot look closely at it doesn't appear to be storm damage just my opinion_ 09172013 04 -2485- Tree on South end of Ifuilett AA cone near 5938 ldlewood next tone" construction property where lace is located, l,ot of dead "nod down on the ground. 09172013 Si idow A9aiser Ila aging on I ndel eloped Ho Ile t Avenue near intersection of Undevelopud Fairfield Road ad you can see close, but not on power line that runs from power pole on the corner of I ndereloped Leech Avenue and Unde.- eloped Fairfield Road. 09172013 -2487- on 5938 idlewood Road. Sbould be taken down by Xael" 09172013 ZA:: - cnnnnenci�rti7e Vic" of Undeveloped Gairfieid Road facing East from the North West Corner of Fairfield at intersection of Undeveloped Leceh Art with utilities in place. Ground cover in not properiv protected or seeded from run off or erosion. 09172013 Undeveloped Fairfield Road looking Best from developed Fairfield Road and intersection of a ,Meadow Lane. No grass sown or ground corer except the barriers to prevent soil erosion and run-off from i'ndneloped Fairfield Road and the utilities already run for water and sewcr and electric m this point. logs from new construction at 2925 Meadow Lane placed on Undevcloped flullett .Avenue hi' contractor? Should bavc been taken care of by contractor m property owner? 09112013 I had ten truck loads from cot' vacant property and the cities t odeveloped right of ways of dead branches, twigs, trees, logs etc, laving on the ground to the re -cycle center at the Mulch Store since Jul) 29, 2013 and have piled up most of the garbage and old construction waste left on my properi, and some from the cities to be hauled to the dump at m} own expense in near future, I rccenth hired a Licensed Trec Sen ice in last two weeks to clear out a 100 to 120 year old red oak half alive half dead, but rotten at the core beeause of a raccoon infestation which made the tree and other branches that were to much of a Iiabilin to my own and surrounding properties from my vacant hots at the expense of between three thousand and four thousand dollars to clean up the land and reduce liability to date f acquired when I purchased the property from the county and neighbor that closed on August 15, 2013, but isn't updated get on County websit , t4) Accumulations of stagnant water. manure, or rubbish w-hi(b arc likely to become breeding places for flies, mosquitoes or vermin; Mosquitoes, this area is monitored even )oar for mosquitoes and is sometimes sprayed or pellets put down, This is an expense to the public and potential health risk. Had one mosquito sprayer on my land this summer asked me to leave properly said oh, thaCs O.K. your on my property. (5) Depositing manure upon am city street, sit) sidewalk, or city property, _ -2490- (Code 1987, § 1000.05A) Animals on a regular basis deposit manure on the property and its not taken care of. Deer, Racoon's. Etc. Sec. 42 -3. Same — Affecting morals and decency. (5) Any vehicle used for the transportation of intoxicating liquor, or for promiscuous sexual intercourse, or any other immoral or illegal purpose; Have found beer cans, bottles currently and a bed mattress a couple of years ago on the property which has been removed at this time. (Code 1987, § I000.10A) Sec. 42 -4. Same — Affecting peace and safety. (9) Accumulations in the open of discarded or disused machinery, household appliances, automobile bodies, or other materials, in a manner conducive to the harboring of rats, mice, snakes, or vermin, or to fire, health, or safety hazards from such accumulation or from the rank growth of vegetation among the items so accumulated; Piles of Leaves and tree limbs dumped onto property and other material such as housing materials and garbage. (10) Noxious weeds, as that term is defined in Minn. Slats. § 18.77, and any excessive growth of other weeds; excessive growth of weeds means weeds or grass which are eight inches or more in height; Creeping Charlie. (14) All dead standing trees which present a hazard to life or property, all elm or other trees found harboring the Dutch elm beetle, all dead standing elm wood, and all cut elm or other wood found harboring the Dutch elm beetle; Dead Trees on the property, hanging limbs and widow makers. (22) The placing or throwing on any street, sidewalk, or other public property of any glass, tacks, nails, bottles, or other substance which may injure any person or animal or damage any pneumatic tire when passing over such substance; (23) The depositing of garbage or refuse on a public right -of -way or on adjacent private property; (25) Property that has been disturbed by construction, grading, or other activity and is not seeded, sodded, or otherwise planted with ground cover within 240 days, unless the 240 days expires between November 1 and May 15, in which case the ground cover must be established by the following July 15, unless the city approves a time extension; Fairfield Road Unimproved has a section due to the recent new construction adjacent to north of road that is bare and not seeded. (26) Construction materials, including piles of dirt, sand, and sod, left in the open on property more than 60 days after construction has been completed or a certificate of occupancy has been issued, whichever comes first; It appears these trees there are logs and branches and stumps dumped on the property from recent new construction surrounding the vacation request property on Hullet Avenue Unimproved. Sec. 42 -6. Abatement. (a) Nuisance subject to abatement A person in violation of sections 42 -2 and 42 -4 shall be deemed to have created a public health hazard, or public nuisance affecting peace and safety in the city, which is subject to abatement by city staff members. - (b) Failure of owner to abate after notice from city. If the owner or occupant thereof fails within seven days after posting by first class mail of a notice to abate a public health hazard, or public nuisance affecting peace and safety on the property, the city by and through its authorized _. personnel may enter upon such property and abate the public health hazard, or nuisance affecting - peace and safety by any reasonable means, including contracting with a private person to do so. -2491- (c) Expenses incurred by city. Any expenses incurred by the city in the abatement of a public health hazard nuisance affecting peace, safety, or moral decency as defined in this chapter shall be the responsibility of the property owner, and if subsequently unpaid, may be assessed against the property as provided in Minn. Stats. § 429.101. (d) Immediate abatement. Nothing in subsection (b) of this section shall prevent the city, without notice or other process, from immediately abating any condition which poses an imminent and serious hazard to human life or safety as determined by the city. Recovery of costs are as follows: -88- -2492- (1) Personal liability. The owner of the premises on which a nuisance has been abated by the city shall be personally liable for the cost to the city of the abatement, including, but not limited to, administrative and legal costs. As soon as the work has been completed and the cost determined, the city shall prepare a bill for the cost and mail it to the owner. Thereupon, the amount shall be immediately due and payable at the office of the City Clerk The city may recover by civil action against the owner and /or the person who committed or maintained the nuisance for all costs and expenditures, including attorney's fees and a civil penalty, incurred by the city in abating or enjoining the nuisance or the city may assess such costs against the property as provided in subsection (b) of this section and may also withhold issuance of any and /or all related city permits or licenses. May be liability exposure to public and city if accident etc. occurs. Tree falls. Potential health risks. (2) Assessment If the city is not fully reimbursed for all of its reasonable costs incurred in the abatement or enjoinment of the nuisance or enforcement of this article, all such unpaid costs, charges and fees may be assessed against each lot or parcel of property to which such costs, charges and fees are attributable. The City Council may direct that the costs, charges and fees be certified to the county auditor for collection along with the current real estate taxes for the following year or in annual installments, not exceeding five years, as the Council may determine in each case. (Code 1987, § 1000.25; Ord. No. 11-2005,8-7-2005; Ord. No. 08-2007,8-28-2007) Trees left on property which came from adjoining properties or new construction. Approving the vacation request would also be in the public best interest as the property which includes the adjoining property have been in and out of city or county ownership as absentee owners have owed the land in the past multiple times and given it back as tax forfeited property and did not own enough land to make it economically viable or build on the site. The city has sewer, water, and electrical utilities already in place running under Fairfield Road Undeveloped to the end of Leach Avenue Unimproved. Adding up to three lots which is low impact housing and consistent with ongoing new construction in the area would maximize the cities investment already in spent on these utilities allowing a return to the city of additional utility revenue and real estate, and local sales tax revenue and dollars invested into the local economy from the construction activity and on -going additional customers to businesses in the City of Mound for goods and services. This is in the public's best interest to maintain a strong tax base, school system, business climate and quality of life and removes the cost of maintaining excess public property and potential liability with no specific public use or benefit. Also this would clean up the property lines to form usable lots and space getting rid of property the City of Mound is would not be responsible or liable for in the future protecting the public good, lower costs and increasing revenue. 4. Agree. S. Agree expect on -going cooperation. Have already been in contact all utility companies and willing to work with any public agency as needed. Determination of Completeness — Concept/Plan Response to City of Mound Comments. L City indicates application for subdivision is incomplete at this time as no major or minor application was submitted. For the vacate request I was asked for a concept plan of what the proposed vacation of property would be used for and how it would benefit the public good. The vacate request has not been approved yet, therefore I believe it is pre - mature to submit a subdivision application and with -out input additional input from the planning commission, city staff, city council and public input. A request will be submitted if vacation request is approved -2493- and agreement with city of what type of subdivision is appropriate would best suit the public good and land use under the cities long term plan. 2. Agree. On the application, I selected R -2 because that is what it is zoned according to city staff, but believe RI is highest and best use. 3. Agree. Expect this development to be considered low impact to suite the neighborhood which I am a member of and think is most appropriate and highest and best use. 4. Willing to work with the city on best use and potential variances or conditional use permits or easements. The Concept plan provided to the City is a guide to how the vacated property would be best used to benefit the public or City of Mound as a whole and in our planning, I believe this to be the highest and best use. Sincerely, Kent Friedrichsen Applicant and owner. -2494- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 13- RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR 2014 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — THREE POINTS BOULEVARD WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 8th day of October, 2013, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project for improvement of Three Points Boulevard from Commerce Boulevard to the east end; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 12`h day of November, 2013, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, 1. The 2014 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project is found to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvements are hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution No. 13 -95 adopted on the 8`h day of October, 2013. 3. Bolton & Menk, Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the cost of the improvement from the proceeds of the tax - exempt bond. Adopted by the City Council this 12`h day of November, 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -2495- Executive Summary gin TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: November 6, 2013 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 13 -29 — Variances for New House at 1728 Finch Lane REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders, has requested front and rear yard variances to allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage at 1728 Finch Lane with a new home with an attached garage. The applicant is requesting the variance on behalf of the property owner, Mr. Jeffrey Jesberg. The property is located in the Dreamwood Addition at the end of Finch Lane. According to Hennepin County records, the 8,345 square foot property has an existing home that was built in 1920. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at theirOctober 15th meeting. A number of concerns about the project were raised by the adjacent neighboK including the possible damage to existing trees on the site and the blocking of site lines from their house to the street. The neighbors have since sent the attached letter identifying additional concerns, including drainage and responsibility for issues related to the sewer line. The applicant has provided the attached letter and photos to respond to those concerns. One of the unique aspects of this project is the presence of asewer line bisecting the property where the proposed house and attached garage will be located. This sewer line serves the adjacent neighbor. Public Works Staff has advised that construction could occur over the sewer line as long as a sleeve is installed. The sleeve is a casing in which the sewer line would sit and be protected thus allowing the construction over the pipe The alternative to the sleeve would be the rerouting of the line. Although rerouting is an available option according to the Public Works Department, the most direct route, which is to construct the sleeve or casing for the sewer linq is the preferred method by the Public Works Departmentas it has fewer bends. The City Attorney reviewed the a 1964 quit claim deed for a perpetual easement for public sewer and other utilities purposes, including the right to remove trees, brush, and soil thereof from over, under and across the easement. Staff, in consultation with the City Attorney, has determined that construction over the easement is possible so long as the Public Works Department has adequate assurances and actions by the applicant andowner to protect the City's interest in the easement and is underlying utilities. The applicant has been advised that the City has the right to undertake whatever means necessary to gain access to its underground utilities and that the home to be constructed over the city's easement may be significantly impacted should the City need to exercise its easement rights Staff has added conditions to the resolution to specifically address this issue. 1 -2496 -Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 After concluding their discussion about the project, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously for its approval subject to conditions. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. ADDITIONAL COMMENT The property is located in the Dreamwood plat. The variance does not violate the 2006 Dreamwood settlement agreement. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. Staff recommends approval of the resolution including the conditions and findings of fact. 1 -2497 -Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION # 13- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 1728 FINCH LANE PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson, submitted a request on behalf of the property owner, Mr. Jeffrey Jesberg, for variances to allow for the construction of a new home at 1728 Finch Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the R -1A single - family residential zoning district requires a 20 foot front yard setback and a 15 foot rear yard setback; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to replace the existing nonconforming house and detached garage on the property; and WHEREAS, the property is an odd shaped lot located at the terminus of Finch Lane that only has a depth of 40 feet along the portion adjacent to Finch Lane; and WHEREAS, home site locations are also limited by the 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water level and the presence of a water utility line between the 50 foot setback and the terminus of Finch Lane; and WHEREAS, the applicant seeks the following setbacks for this project ; and ..; Proposed Variance 8,345 sq. ft. - 10.2' 9.8' 5' 10' 10' - 1,862 sq. ft. Required Existing Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 8,345 sq. ft. Front Yard 20 feet 7' 3" Rear Yard 15 feet 4' 3" Side Yard (northeast) 6 feet 3'9" Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 3,338 sq. ft. 1,517 sq. ft. ..; Proposed Variance 8,345 sq. ft. - 10.2' 9.8' 5' 10' 10' - 1,862 sq. ft. WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variances for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated October 9, 2013 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variances subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variances were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its October 15, 2013 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the variances, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance requests at its November 12, 2013 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The construction of a single- family home with an attached garage is a reasonable use of the property and will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not due to the actions of the applicant. The lot depth of 40 feet near Finch Lane is half is what is required by City Code. 4. Setbacks on the property will be improved as both the front and rear setbacks have been increased. In addition, the project will eliminate the existing nonconforming side yard setback; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variances with the following conditions: Applicant and owner shall comply with all requirements from the Public Works Department related to the required work on the public sanitary sewer line including but not lot limited to, sleeving the existing sewer line that is located within the 15 -foot public easement that bisects the property. Applicant or owner shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs related to the required utility work. Applicant or owner shall also be responsible for coordinating work in with the Public Works Director or designee including all required permitting. No utility work is authorized until approval is granted by the Public Works Director or designee. 2. Site, utilities, and drainage plans shall be subject to review and comment by the City Engineer and Public Works Director or their designee. Site runoff cannot be directed towards adjacent properties. The use of gutters for the project shall be required. 3. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for payment of all costs incurred by the City that are associated with this application. 4. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 5. Applicant and owner shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 2500- 6. Applicant and owner shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits. 7. The applicant and owner shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the MCWD by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 10. The applicant and owner are solely responsible for any negative impact on the utility service to the adjoining parcels. 11. Applicant and owner are advised that the perpetual easement for public sewer and other utility purposes, including the right to open, lay out, construct, maintain and service the same and the right to remove trees, brush and soil therefrom over, under and across the Southwesterly 15 feet of the Northerly 42.5 feet of Lot 12, Block 12. Block 14, Dreamwood is in force. 12. The applicant and owner are advised that City has the right to undertake whatever means necessary to gain access to its underground utilities and that the home to be constructed over the City's easement may be significantly impacted should the City need to exercise its easement rights. 13. The City may require the applicant and owner to indemnify and hold the City harmless prior to the issuance of a building permit for this property which will be recorded. If a hold harmless agreement is required, it shall be prepared by the City Attorney with all costs to be paid by the applicant or owner. If there is mortgage on the property, written consent from all lienholders will be required. 14. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: (to be inserted) -2501- Adopted by the City Council this 12th of November 2013. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -2502- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 15, 2013 Chair Ward called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Cynthia Penner, Pete Wiechert and Councilmember Mark Wegscheid. Members absent: George Linkert, Kelvin Retterath. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Mike Gardner, 1724 Finch La; Grant Johnson, Suncrest Builders BOARD OF APPEALS A. Planning Case No. 13 -29 Review of Variance Application 1728 Finch Lane Applicant: Grant Johnson, Suncrest Builders Trapp introduced the requested variance. The applicant, on behalf of owner Jeffrey Jesberg, has requested front and rear yard variances to allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage. The requested rear and front setbacks are a slight improvement on the existing setbacks. Staff has determined that there should be more details about the utility easements affecting the property. Conditions in the recommendation are fairly standard and straightforward except for condition #1, the reconstruction of the sewer line extending into the neighbor's property. Grant Johnson, Suncrest Builders, challenging site, no closer to the lake to preserve line of sight for neighbors. Option to route sewer around (expensive and not best); leave as is and sleeve the pipe. Mike Gardner, 1724 Finch Lane, is concerned about the sight line to the street; people would not know their house is there; no visibility; no curb appeal. Also, there are 3 trees on the property line that he doesn't want to see taken down. He's wondering if a double garage tuck under would be possible instead of a linear attached garage. Johnson was not aware of the trees. The new house will be sitting at about the same place as the current house. Line of sight and visibility is basically what our customer asked for. Tuck under may be possible but haven't considered that. Wegscheid asked who thought the trees should go. Gardner was not certain and demonstrated the location of the trees in question. Wegscheid thought a deal might be struck with the owner to replace them. -2503- Gawtry indicated it looked like the setbacks were improving except in the one corner. His concern is for the easement, who owns it and can it be built on. Ward asked if anyone has any comments regarding the criteria for Practical Difficulties on page 1 of the planning report. Gawtry didn't see anything extremely "detrimental ". It is all in the point of view. Ward said that we try to hold to minimal requests. A tuck -under garage is a nice idea but not sure if it's practical or possible; doesn't appear to be a monster, out of scope or community. Wegscheid stresses the comments about the easement. Goode confirmed that the neighbor could see the roadway now. Gardner said they would not be able to see the road at all with the new construction. He has not voiced these concerns to Mr. Jesberg. MOTION by Ward, second by Bergquist, to recommend approval of the variance permit per staff recommendations and conditions. MOTION approved unanimously. City Council date will not be set at this time, pending easement resolution. -2504- Date: 11/6/13 To: Mound City Council From: Grant Johnson, Owner, Suncrest Builders - Wausau Homes RE: Jeff Jesberg Design Options This letter is meant to address outstanding questions concerning the variance application for Jeff Jesberg's proposed new home at 1728 Finch Lane.. The idea was suggested at the Planning Commission meeting that Mr. Jesberg consider a tuck -under garage design for his new home. This design option was considered, however, there are two issues with a tuck -under garage design: 1. The grades on the lot and street do not fall enough to support a tuck -under garage without either creating a low spot (and drainage issue) in front of the garage doors, or substantially raising the elevation of the first floor of the house above the current elevation. 2. Part of Mr. Jesberg's motivation for building this new home is to create a home that, unlike his current home, allows for "aging in place ", and putting the garage on a whole lower level does not support that objective. The neighbors have sent the City a letter addressing two concerns, and we wanted to also address those concerns. 1. The costs associated with sleeving the existing sewer lines will be paid entirely by Mr. Jesberg. 2. Mr. Jesberg's new home will have gutters on the east side to redirect all roof runoff away from the neighbor's home, and the top of Mr. Jesberg's foundation will be no higher than (and probably slightly lower than) the top of the neighbor's foundation, as the general topography is falling from east to west. Lastly, there was some discussion of the existing trees between Mr. Jesberg's home and the neighbor's home, and I've attached photos I took this morning showing these trees. The large maple tree ( -16 ") further north on the lot (where the existing home is closest to the east line) is directly on the property line, and the new home will be further away from that line, so there should be very limited, if any, risk to that tree. The clump of smaller ( -8 ") maple trees closer to the lake appear to be on Mr. Jessberg's property, but again, the newer home should be no closer to these trees than the existing home, and other than trimming branches that extend into where the new home will be, these trees will not need to be removed (see photos). Please don't hesitate to call or write with any questions. Thank you, Grant Johnson 763- 479 -5555 orjohnsong @wausauhomes.com -2505- To: Mound City Council Members From: Michael & Susan Gardner 1724 Finch Lane Regarding the proposed building project at 1728 Finch Lane My husband attended the planning commission meeting addressing this project but I was unable to attend as I was out of town on business. There are just a couple of thoughts I would like to share and make perfectly clear. Apparently our sewer line that runs through Mr. Jesberg's property must be "sleeved" before his new structure can be built over it. To my knowledge there was no discussion on who would assume the cost of this sewer work. Let it be known that we will not pay for any of the sewer work. The location of the sewer line was approved by the city or someone at some time back in history and it's not our responsibility to correct it. It's my understanding that nothing would need to be done if this building project was not being done. Therefore we won't pay for any of the sewer work. Mr. Jesberg or the city will need to cover the cost. Next, I'm very concerned about the flow of water runoff. Many years ago we had water problems in our basement. We had a drainage tide system and sump pump installed. We now have a perfectly dry basement! We haven't had so much as a drop of water or damp area since we did the system. I'm really afraid that this construction is going to have a negative impact on the flow and drainage of water from our property to the street. So, let it also be known, that if we have any water problems after this structure is built we will know that the building on that property is the sole cause of the problem. We will hold the builder and Mr. Jesberg accountable for damages. I also want to add that I support my husband's concern regarding the size of the building and that it will completely block our view of the street. We won't be able to look out of any of our windows or door on the west side of our house to see the street area. Thank you for reviewing my concerns, Susan Gardner -2506- �.0 I 4,iu4",aM4 108. Kntheryn O'Toole, single Warranty Deed To Dated February 21, 1961 Thomas E. Gainor Filed February 23, 1961 3277466 Book 2291 of Deeds, page 52 Consideration $1.00 etc. Lot 12, Block 14,, in Dream wood. Free from all incumbrances, except a mortgage in the amount of $5,000.00. 109. Thomas E. Gainor, single Quit Claim Deed To Dated September 23, 1964 The Village of Mound Filed December 21, 1964 (Minnesota Corporation) Book. 2406 of Deeds, page 207 3518629 Consideration $1.00 etc. A perpetual easement for public sewer and other utility purposes; including the right to open, lay out, construct, maintain and service the same and the right to remove trees, brush and soil therefrom over, under and across the Southwesterly 15 feet of the Northeasterly 42.5 feet of Lot 12, Block 14,- Dieamwood. Minneapolis Federal Savings and Loan Association, a holder of a mortgage of record in BBok 3229 of Mortgages, page 221, does hereby consent to the encumbrance of the fee title and their mortgage interest by the above described easement. 110. For Judgment, Bankruptcy and Tax Search See Certificates Attached. Certifications by North Star Abstract & Title Guaranty, Inc., cover records in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Henneoin County, State of Minnesota as to Notices of Federal Tax Liens, _ Notices of State Income Tax Liens, and Notices of State Inheritance Tax Liens. -2511- TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: BACKGROUND Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director October 9, 2013 13 -29 Variance Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders 1728 Finch Lane (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -13 -0018) R -1A Single Family Residential Low Density Residential The applicant, Mr. Grant Johnson of Suncrest Builders, has requested front and rear yard variances to allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage at 1728 Finch Lane with a new home with an attached garage. The applicant is requesting the variance on behalf of the property owner, Mr. Jeffrey Jesberg. The property is located in the Dreamwood Addition at the end of Finch Lane. According to Hennepin County records, the 8,345 square foot property has an existing home that was built in 1920. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, P- ^ ^'; ^ ^1 Difficulties' is defined as follows: -2512- Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was deemed to be complete on October 2, 2013. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be October 3, 2013. Therefore, with the 60 -day extension, the City's deadline for action on the variance application is on or before December 2, 2013. SITE INFORMATION The property is an odd shaped lot located at the terminus of Finch Lane on Harrison Bay. The front of the lot is considered the northwest side as it is the only part located on an improved public street. The depth of the lot along Finch Lane is only 40 feet. The placement of the home and attached garage on the lot are limited due to the 50 foot setback from the ordinary high water line, as well as the presence of a water utility line between the 50 foot setback and the terminus of Finch Lane. PROPOSED DIMENSIONS Lot Area Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard (northeast) Hardcover (maximum 40 %) Required Existing 6,000 sq. ft. 8,345 sq. ft. 20 feet 7' 3" 15 feet 4' 3" 6 feet 3' 9" 3,338 sq. ft. 1,517 sq. ft. -2513- Proposed Variance 8,345 sq. ft. - 10.2' 9.8' 5' 10' 10' - 1,862 sq. ft. CITY /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVI E W Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney Applicant and owner are reminded that the property is subject to the Dreamwood Settlement Agreement. Scott Qualle, Building Official No comments. Greg Pederson, Fire Chief There are no fire code issues with this. Brett Eidem, MCWD I do not believe the District would have any issues with this variance request; however, this project would more than likely trigger the Erosion Control Rule from the District and require a permit. DISCUSSION • The applicant is seeking to replace the existing 1920 home and detached garage with anew two -story home with attached garage. • The shape of the lot limits the ability of the property owner to construct a home without a variance. • The presence of the water line through the property limits the ability of the property owner to place the home significantly toward the shoreline. The placement closer to Finch Lane will also minimize view obstruction by the house to the neighbor's property. • The applicant has worked with Staff to address concerns, including modifying the project to increase the rear yard setback to five feet. The applicant has also agreed to reconstruct the neighbor's existing sewer line to allow for building over the utility easement. • Resolution No. 91 -148 was adopted on October 22, 1991 to allow a nonconforming garage on the existing nonconforming property at 1728 Finch Lane. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the side yard setback variance for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall reconstruct the sewer which extends into the neighbor's property. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. -2514- 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The construction of a single - family home with an attached garage is a reasonable use of the property and will be in character with the surrounding neighborhood. 3. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property and not due to the actions of the applicant. The lot depth of 40 feet near Finch Lane is half of what is required by City Code. 4. Setbacks on the property will be improved as both the front and rear setbacks have been increased. In addition, the project will eliminate the existing nonconforming side yard setback. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Pending recommendation from the Planning Commission, the proposed applications will be forwarded to an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible meeting dates are Tuesday, October 22, 2013 or Tuesday, November 12, 2013. -2515- F.1 1=j 1 RECD gE,P ®3 2013 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. City Council Date Please tvoe or print leaibly SUBJECT Address i 7 LA P'; 1 1'4rie' PROPERTY Lot 12- Block__L- LEGAL DESC. orewYt�I Subdivision {,Ja /� (ry PID �% �,�^"'(�y��" `i �� 00 j d Zoning: R1 to R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name --1 e'#re,,, '�s�eC4 OWNER �/9Email / Address i 2-Y {— ncL1 Lane-- <+ ou✓I a� —1 Phone Home -C2-' `7 22 7W�ork Fax APPLICANT y�n 9 �a,arrai" 1 Name!;UYIC`E(1 170;LI61 TM�scm Email IohAn(�g)CdIKStf✓4LI&If,4U (IF OTHER X �3n1'2- Address % r 4in S t r IADle 647y), MM THAN OWNER) Coll Pym:C--Home 1a12 -20q Sd)6Work7Z3-Uf- 5'133' Fax 20-g7f-S -r60 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (jX) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. F O 4e (ci Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): 4e4 j4rwq e,, Variance Information (1/18/2013) Page 4 of 6 -2516- 7 Case No. ✓' 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No X. If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): r)i"Mek l J' hJe44 hoAio VIdllmed't- -fyvn4- ar/�� 7'1° t— S Acks 'L'i ,--, IL will impfc�" n�Jt�l n9c�C ii vt�"l"i1L%Si . SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: (N S EQ '2-0 ft. )0,2- 1p ft. L? o' ft. Side Yard: (&8 E W) (0 ft. 10 ft. ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. Rear Yard: C (N S E W) S ft, ft Lakeside: ( N &E W) ft. ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft. Lot Size: Hardcover: —sq ft sq ft _sq ft sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes N, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography O soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage () existing situation K) too shallow ( ) shape () other: specify Please describe: _ efl4r4e- �V v,eK®— 1,r on 10 Variance Information (1/16/2013) Page 5 of 6 -2517- Case No. . � _ 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No W. If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No X. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( >O, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Applican Variance Information (1/18/2013) Page 6 of 6 -2518- Date Y v 0`/3 Date Z-? 1.7 _ m r off_ Y m a 0 T 1 m D y O . Z a 4 Al J n: A 1 O Z m m 0 2 i m r O Z m m 4 A2 i - --- ---- -- -- - - - --- - 2520 "°"°` I 0 [ . m | . | ««y\ wx =• � / �' / ; \ A21 , \ }( l > _- �: }r`} _ _ \ }/ - - - : /])��r §` "N I[[ - ( \� _ , .. > . m | . | ««y\ wx =• � / �' / ; \ A21 IT 0 A3 II mu— 4 VSG51- E030 -iG YSCSI- 2034 -i 3-0-AI9 VSfSZ -Zb /6 yy 1�, ��F_ llywRY mrcw v� a,TH m Kn by ,y I I O KITGNEN N 13' -10" z 12' -4" 1 A£N 1 1 I S I O O 1 F a( GREAT ROOM - -- 11 111 21-0" x 14' -6` ..; i II _ II I I VSSPE-60010 VSSP210616 I I I I 4 1 I 0 1 1 1 A3 II mu— A51 I li� --- - ----------------- 2 31� � !! - R! (` ! R( ® ! / !� NO A4 | »( (� \ D [ IT qm Hk §§ I !) ®! A4 | »( (� \ D 2 ' \\ = =O =17-1§ § J ) §w A4 | »( (� \ D The application of City Code to the Jesberg property at 1728 Finch lane imposes Practical Difficulties principally because the side yard is the lake shore, and the lot is only 40' deep from front to back. Mr. Jesberg is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner permitted by the zoning ordinance (single family residential home), his plight is due to circumstances unique to this property and not of his doing (unusual lot shape), and the variance requested will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Granting the requested variance will not confer on Mr. Jesberg any special privileges denied to other landowners in the area, nor will it be materially detrimental to other properties in the area. On the contrary, construction of a new home should help enhance both the aesthetic and market values of the neighboring properties. The requested front and rear yard variances are the minimum variances necessary to still ensure off - street parking in front of Mr. Jesberg's (already shallow) garage, and to ensure adequate fire clearances from the neighboring property, as per a discussion with Building Official Scott Qualle. The requested variance should be granted as the resulting new home will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance, and remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the proposed left side yard setback is improved from non - complying to complying, the proposed Lakeshore setback remains in compliance, and both the front and rear yard setbacks are improved over current conditions. Lastly, the existing utility easement was reviewed with Public Works Superintendent Ray Hanson, and a plan devised to replace the existing sewer line to allow for building the new home as proposed. Suncrest Builders - 10 -1 -13 Grant Johnson, Co -owner -2525- W a 1 ~ Ln y" w "8 t„ f N/1�NJ a. �s ss� a c \SS\ o g' e 0 j� wT �(q f ¢tee t �Sno zbs6, N �mwm + d 'Ul (D o m ` Z o ¢a U U C G c J oc s N � � r a� V q o > a O O o t1 y �i y 1 N m E N O c d L N L O C H C 0 LL 0 0 0 N N • X ❑ 4 0 ® O O�� ryA J 0� m d N N O U J J WU o wM ei� � N c1 J m F 3 wow° N aW W N N N N o -2526- a� o N y�U y❑ WaO. W j.n N -2526- 1. 1 f N S 14N �y T °N -- Qom[[// ^o ry .!, FA •oar 3� a,�so o�d at V 0,15• �d m4 u �a l0! 'eve \ �S�LY/ 9p A9 o ° e f pN N bb�Y bLN� � 9y yoNNO sN��dg1N�0 �N�e d '� �•Ms . p) � V co ®8 °6LN mgd If O V yV � s r y - r 6� , f �rgs6l °6L � k >1 r v 7d6y0 44� s '$gyp 1 / // o� �o Lp ' o 4fV B44L 8 X014 m M O W y � Oro c mwaro, 3 a Q)Z cw Z Ni �'o (tj�aocg c� c � N J a � `t"a�a =cmSmw o V o C O N J m = —m 0) .08 (oy IZD loo d = o y 0 °o C\i a ° C m�3cwwZZ o o d m d T A J W t t S y V h 2 a e e o J 0 t® t, *00 J r { ,J G� Z M ® �W 0 o a N 0 T Q) 0 CL CL C; a N m � W W S W w M O W N (1) ? ao 9 a W Z E z6J °off W N Q ft1 M J LL V) N a o b 'C1 ti ~ M M p 12 o co C a�b � o z (D N V C O o c o 4) C '@ a° d o N C 7 LL O U) U ++ co O C U U p cn 0 Z LU • x o a W J �rgs6l °6L � k >1 r v 7d6y0 44� s '$gyp 1 / // o� �o Lp ' o 4fV B44L 8 X014 m M O W y � Oro c mwaro, 3 a Q)Z cw Z Ni �'o (tj�aocg c� c � N J a � `t"a�a =cmSmw o V o C O N J m = —m 0) .08 (oy IZD loo d = o y 0 °o C\i a ° C m�3cwwZZ o o d m d T A J W t t S y V h 2 a e e o J 0 t® t, *00 J r { ,J G� Z M ® �W 0 o a N 0 T Q) 0 CL CL C; a N m � W W S W w M O W N (1) ? ao 9 a W Z E z6J °off W N Q ft1 M J LL V) N a o b 'C1 ti ~ M M p 12 o co a�b � o z N V O. a,o Na o� � O q coo -2527- L- �cM � J � V Cw P C a� O �D � y C9 p ry/ 4Q { Wo � 0 .0s dY /, y� 08 c� ! O N� 8t N1b 9yB 1 3' b?YNON,OJ \ \ m '�Nhy� aye �yl y0Npy��N/ m y./ 1« S, ai„ BSoZ O'y yONov y, IyS x A x jz / / s ` cb 4e 9/ m m x 4 .1009 a� 2�5 / A,4 LS sa °B�SL °B ! G�® M s LS (� \ \� �, sy co O a G Nw U - y 'tt N A! Lu O C O g o o co y 8 U C C C'J G V 2c^DN N ^ °° ^� Y w N O y� UO m'� `•C Qi Glw yLi N'CNh V ccCC 2 N_ U N U O N (p .0 N i O C y h y y m h we�co�c�a� = wwww x Q J co +'C.. N COi can ZE c! N" C� d d ►—IZ M w 'Mtl' d vZ)i y O a Z a m i s z 3 W C L 0 N 0 E o N � Q M 000 C O o C 0 c c C a N H o N OC c c w O Z J J O U o m M O Q o in 0 Z W 0 • X ❑ 4 W J G�® M s LS (� \ \� �, sy co O a G Nw U - y 'tt N A! Lu O C O g o o co y 8 U C C C'J G V 2c^DN N ^ °° ^� Y w N O y� UO m'� `•C Qi Glw yLi N'CNh V ccCC 2 N_ U N U O N (p .0 N i O C y h y y m h we�co�c�a� = wwww x Q J co +'C.. N COi can ZE c! N" C� d d ►—IZ M w 'Mtl' d vZ)i y O a Z a ca tJ9 ,C b G O N ou N a a ab y y � O ctl .!7 G y 42) U VbWwO }- A�b� � o�c -2528- m i s z 3 W L 0 0 o N � Q M 000 W ! LL7 g f- OO W O Z J J U m M O U- fA N ca tJ9 ,C b G O N ou N a a ab y y � O ctl .!7 G y 42) U VbWwO }- A�b� � o�c -2528- C)Qr, 286 October 22, 1991 RESOLUTION #91 -148 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A NONCONFORMING GARAGE ON AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING PROPERTY AT 1728 FINCH LANE, LOT 12, BLOCK 14, DREAMWOOD, PID #13- 117 -24 13 0018 PLZ CASE NO. 91 -027 WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to recognize existing nonconforming setbacks and an undersized lot to allow construction of a nonconforming detached garage, and; WHEREAS, the applicant submitted six alternative plan (A through F) detailing both attached and detached garage options, and; WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance request using the proposed Plan 'B' of an 18' x 20' detached garage as this plan has the least impact and results in a minimum variance request, and; WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R -2 Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code requires a lot area of 6,000 square feet, a 15 foot rear yard setback, 6 foot side yard setbacks for "lots of record ", and a 20 foot front yard setback, and; WHEREAS, a storm sewer drain is located approximately 12 feet from the north property line of the subject parcel at the driveway entrance and limits the access, and; WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful, nonconforming residential property when the alterations will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval by a 6 to 3 vote. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby recognize the existing nonconforming setbacks of the principal dwelling and approve the variances required for the new detached accessory building as listed below: a. Lot area variance of 2,583 square feet. 1 -2529- 287 287 October 22, 1991 b. Front yard setback variance of 12.7 feet to the principal dwelling. C. Rear yard setback variance of 9 feet to the principal dwelling. d. Front yard setback variance of 4 feet to the proposed detached accessory building. e. Side yard setback variance of 2 feet to the proposed detached accessory building. f. Driveway access width variance of 2 feet. 2. The City Council authorizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. 3. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alterations to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owners reasonable use of their land: Construction of an 18' x 20' detached garage to be setback 16 feet from the front property line, 4 feet from the north side property line and 4 feet from the east rear property line. 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lot 12, Block 14, Dreamwood. PID #13- 117 -24 13 0018. 5. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 6. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Smith and seconded by Councilmember Ahrens. 2 -2530- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1, 2013 Chair Ward called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, George Linkert, Kelvin Retterath, Pete Wiechert and Councilmember Mark Wegscheid. Members absent: David Goode, Cynthia Penner. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Joe Jezierski, Jr (4431 Lamberton Rd); Gary & Cec Meister (5125 Windsor Rd); Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Jim Brunzell (5111 Windsor Rd); Mike Werth (5116 Waterbury Rd) APPROVE MEETING AGENDA Ward asked to add an item to elect a temporary chair to the agenda. MOTION by Ward, second by Gawtry, to amend the agenda. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Linkert, second by Wiechert, to nominate Commissioner Gawtry to Chair the meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 3 2013 MOTION by Linkert, second by Wiechert, to approve the minutes for September 3, 2013. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS A. Review of Variance and Expansion Applications 4431 Lamberton Road Applicant: Joseph Jezierski Rita introduced the applications to remodel the existing home and construct a new deck. The expansion request is due to the excavation of the basement of the existing, non- conforming home and garage to increase the basement height from 6 ft 9 inches to 8 ft 5 in. The variance is a result of the garage expansion towards the rear and side lot lines. Hardcover is and will continue to be an issue on the lot but the property owner has said he is willing to work with staff to minimize the hardcover. -2531- Staff has determined that there is no other way to expand the garage without use of the variance procedure and recommends approval with conditions as outlined in the planning report. Linkert said that, initially, it looked like there was lots of property to consider but, after looking further it was noted that there was only one place for the garage. Retterath asked if the hardcover issue is usually resolved by the time the Council acts on requests like this. Rita said that it varies. Retterath questioned if the goal was to maintain the present hardcover. Rita said that improving the hardcover is the goal. Retterath thought that the plan seemed a little loose. Smith indicated that conditions will be included in the resolution and will be checked before the building permit is issued. Joseph Jezierski (4431 Lamberton Rd) stated that where the garage addition sits is already hardcover. He indicated that the removal of the wooden retaining wall is being addressed with the affected neighbor. He also stated that he is very open to working with pervious pavers. Retterath asked if they could move the garage forward to increase the 3 foot setback. Jezierski replied that, if it's possible, he's open to changing the plan. Bergquist wanted to know if the neighbor approved of the plan. Jezierski said that he's talked with some and gotten positive response. Discussion Retterath stated that he'd like to see the rear setback at 5 feet because during construction excavation of the neighbor's yard it will likely be needed on a temporary basis for the construction of the foundation. Increasing the setback to 5 feet would reduce the amount of excavation that would need to take place on the neighbor's property. The expansion permit is valid because the basement height needs to be increased. There is a real need for more storage. Bergquist would like to add a loth condition to require written approval of the project by the neighbors. Smith indicated that there is no consideration by the Council of neighbor support when approving or denying the request. Linkert thought the 5 foot setback would be reasonable, but, 3 feet will be adequate. To make it smaller would not be useful for him. MOTION by Linkert, second by Wiechert, to recommend approval of the variance and expansion permits per staff recommendations and conditions. MOTION approved. Bergquist, Gawtry, Linkert, Wiechert and Wegscheid voted yes. Retterath voted no. -2532- B. Review of Expansion Application 5116 Waterbury Road Applicant: Mike Werth Trapp introduced the application. The applicant has requested an expansion permit to allow him to dig a basement under the existing home and expand the livable area. Trapp clarified the survey that includes a proposed garage and home addition which are both conforming and so are not under consideration at this time. The hardcover is currently under the 40 %. Staff is recommending approval with conditions as outlined in the planning report. Mike Werth (applicant, Chaska, MN) indicated that he lives in Chaska and is redoing this house. Retterath asked if he considered lopping off the front part of the house during the remodeling process. Werth replied that he had not. The addition works as it is. Discussion Linkert thought the project looked straight forward. MOTION by Bergquist, second by Wiechert, to recommend approval of the expansion permit with staff recommendations and findings of fact. MOTION approved unanimously. C. Street Vacation Application 5913 Fairfield Road Applicant: Kent Friedrichsen Smith introduced the application. The applicant wishes to vacate the undeveloped Hullett Avenue that lies west and south of his property. Smith indicated that the applicant provided a future plan for a 3 lot subdivision, which is not under consideration at this time. Staff recommends approval of the vacation. The area is not currently maintained by the city and would appear to be a better use if vacated. Retterath stated that it is understood that the applicant has not been given any promise of future approvals. Linkert asked about the small little cutout at Fairfield. Smith said that Public Works recommended inclusion in this request. Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd) reaffirmed where the city property and wetlands were located. He suggested that the rest of Hullett Avenue be vacated to the north. He has contacted all of his neighbors and the expense to participate was prohibitive. Discussion Retterath is happy to see this development take place. -2533- Matt VanNelson (2925 Meadow Lane) asked if Leach were developed past Meadow, who would get charged for development of the road. Smith indicated that it would likely be a developer cost. Friedrichsen — Have talked with staff regarding whether Fairfield Road would be private or public and who would bear the cost of construction. Staff has indicated it would likely be the developers cost to install. Friedrichsen thinks that the Fairfield portion of the road constructed should be maintained by the City once it is constructed. Staff noted that further discussion would be needed once a subdivision has been proposed. Retterath stated that if Hullett north of Fairfield were proposed to be vacated he wouldn't pursue vacation because of the added square footage and that the assessed value may rise. Linkert thought it was too bad we missed the opportunity to make a connection between Fairfield and Idlewood to improve the accessibility of the park to a greater area. MOTION by Linkert, second by Retterath, to recommend approval with staff recommendations and conditions. MOTION approved unanimously. OLD /NEW BUSINESS A. Staff Report and Projects Update • Applications under review • Gawtry /Wegscheid moved special meeting on October 15`h. Unanimous • Mound Magic and Marketing Study information • Dakota Junction is opening soon • Urban Agriculture — bees and chickens • Parking B. 2013 Term Expirations — Ward /Gawtry / Linkert C. Council Liaison Report —none ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Linkert, second by Bergquist, to adjourn at 8:42 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -2534- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1S, 2013 Chair Ward called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Stephen Ward; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Cynthia Penner, Pete Wiechert and Councilmember Mark Wegscheid. Members absent: George Linkert, Kelvin Retterath. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Mike Gardner, 1724 Finch La; Grant Johnson, Suncrest Builders BOARD OF APPEALS A. Planning Case No. 13 -29 Review of Variance Application 1728 Finch Lane Applicant: Grant Johnson, Suncrest Builders Trapp introduced the requested variance. The applicant, on behalf of owner Jeffrey Jesberg, has requested front and rear yard variances to allow the replacement of the existing home and detached garage. The requested rear and front setbacks are a slight improvement on the existing setbacks. Staff has determined that there should be more details about the utility easements affecting the property. Conditions in the recommendation are fairly standard and straightforward except for condition #1, the reconstruction of the sewer line extending into the neighbor's property. Grant Johnson, Suncrest Builders, challenging site, no closer to the lake to preserve line of sight for neighbors. Option to route sewer around (expensive and not best); leave as is and sleeve the pipe. Mike Gardner, 1724 Finch Lane, is concerned about the sight line to the street; people would not know their house is there; no visibility; no curb appeal. Also, there are 3 trees on the property line that he doesn't want to see taken down. He's wondering if a double garage tuck under would be possible instead of a linear attached garage. Johnson was not aware of the trees. The new house will be sitting at about the same place as the current house. Line of sight and visibility is basically what our customer asked for. Tuck under may be possible but haven't considered that. Wegscheid asked who thought the trees should go. Gardner was not certain and demonstrated the location of the trees in question. Wegscheid thought a deal might be struck with the owner to replace them. -2535- Gawtry indicated it looked like the setbacks were improving except in the one corner. His concern is for the easement, who owns it and can it be built on. Ward asked if anyone has any comments regarding the criteria for Practical Difficulties on page 1 of the planning report. Gawtry didn't see anything extremely "detrimental ". It is all in the point of view. Ward said that we try to hold to minimal requests. A tuck -under garage is a nice idea but not sure if it's practical or possible; doesn't appear to be a monster, out of scope or community. Wegscheid stresses the comments about the easement. Goode confirmed that the neighbor could see the roadway now. Gardner said they would not be able to see the road at all with the new construction. He has not voiced these concerns to Mr. Jesberg. MOTION by Ward, second by Bergquist, to recommend approval of the variance permit per staff recommendations and conditions. MOTION approved unanimously. City Council date will not be set at this time, pending easement resolution. OLD /NEW BUSINESS A. Review and discussion — Parking regulations Trapp reviewed the data by section of review under the following topics: • Sufficiency of existing parking facilities to fulfill parking requirements where the use and intensity is not changing (i.e. downtown CBD parking agreements and use). Gawtry thought it shouldn't be an issue. If the parking doesn't work for a new owner, they lose business and it's their problem. Ward doesn't find that parking is in the top 10 problems in this town. it is important to give city staff discretion in this issue. Whatever has to happen in the code to do that is what we need to do. He asked that staff come back with a starting point for us to consider. • Potential for a parking space standard for shopping center uses -2536- Trapp gave the example of Stonegate Plaza with the introduction of the church into the center. The same standard applied at Stonegate was used recently with Commerce Place. We would like to change the code to have an actual standard for use with shopping centers (4.5 parking spaces for each 1,000 Sf of building area). • Potential for sharing /reducing parking space requirements due to varying hours /days of operation of different uses Ward asked what the city's interest is in ensuring adequate parking. Smith said that was primarily a safety issue. The negative is that if one business has all the parking other business clientele will park there as well. Ward, again, indicated that giving staff discretion would apply here. It was suggested that Staff bring back specific regulation changes and examples for consideration by the Commission. B. Preliminary review and discussion — urban agriculture (chickens and bees) Smith gave a brief overview of the preliminary research that was compiled. Wegscheid thought we should leave as is and amend the code for specifics. Trapp agreed that specifics in the code would make administration easier. Bergquist thought that we should leave as is. Gawtry though we should add bees to the list of prohibited animals. Smith suggested that the preliminary research be compiled into a study /report and then brought back to an upcoming meeting for formal consideration by the Commission. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Ward, second by Goode, to adjourn at 8:26 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -2537- Centennial Bldg Dedication — Monday, October 7, 2013, 2:30pm Mayor Mark Hanus Thank you all for being here today. Dedicating the renaming of a building in itself is rather inconsequential. But what it represents is not. This in part, represents a new era. It's another move in the evolution of Mound. Who can say Mound hasn't changed? Look at the before and after aerial photographs of downtown Mound and tell me we haven't changed. Look at the streets, sewer, and water systems in place and tell me we haven't changed, renewed, and rebuilt Mound. Look at the activities in this building and tell me we haven't changed. There is a whole new set of clientele coming and going from this building than there has been before. WeCAB, The Westonka Historical society, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, Hennepin County Tax Assessors office, and there are other public or quasi- public agencies that may still join us here. This leads to new revenue that wasn't there before. This goes directly to the bottom line to help offset the cost of doing business. So what has brought us to this point? Well, I supposed the council had a small role but not very much other than approving these changes. Without any doubt the primary credit goes to the hard work of our city staff. They have been doubling down on responsibilities and working harder than ever before with more expected of them each and every day. I'm glad that there are several city employees here from all levels. This isn't said too often so it's time to do it now. This is one of the hardest working staffs I've had the pleasure of working with, and since I am coming from a highly competitive industry in the private sector, that's saying something. They're dedicated and with the leadership of the city manager they do whatever is necessary to get the job done. They are truly appreciated. Thomas Jefferson said: "I am a great believer in luck and I find the harder I work, the more of it I have." That pretty well describes what I see in our employees. Yes, they are stressed sometimes like anyone else can be, but they persevere and get the job done. We are pleased to dedicate this building again, under its new name —the Centennial Building - -to the citizens of Mound but also to the people who have worked for all these years under its roof. To my colleagues on the City Council, I thank you for your support in this next link in the chain of evolution for Mound. And for the professional and cooperative manner we have been able to conduct business for the city. And to the citizens of Mound I thank you for your patience and understanding in all the things that we try to accomplish in this, your home of Mound. -2538- Harbor Wine & Spirits October 2012 Date Weather Cust 13 Cust 12 Variance 2013 2012 Difference +l - Cash + /. 10/1/2013 Sun 60 328 261 67 6129.19 4815.19 1314 0 10/2/2013 Sun 60 315 366 -51 7312.17 6732 580.17 0.02 10/3/2013 Ovrest 60 321 320 1 7224.5 6583.7 640.8 -0.46 10/4/2013 Ovrest 60 577 323 254 15434.11 7125.34 8308.77 2.57 10/5/2013 Sun 60 607 562 45 16111.65 14953.07 1158.58 7.22 10/6/2013 628 -628 15661.89 - 15661.89 10/7/2013 Sun 70 287 287 5465.28 5465.28 0.71 10/8/2013 Sun mid 70s 321 274 47 6188.07 5632.95 555.12 -19.38 10/9/2013 Sun mid 70s 329 327 2 6429.57 7078.43 - 648.86 -0.89 10/10/2013 Sun mid 70s 316 299 17 6103.38 6218.86 - 115.48 -0.14 10/11/2013 Ovrest hi 60s 568 287 281 14019 6310.88 7708.12 0.19 10/12/2013 Sun mid 70s 584 553 31 14900.21 13936.72 963.49 1.07 10/13/2013 587 -587 14764.33 - 14764.33 10/14/2013 ovrest 60s 262 262 4905.33 4905.33 -0.96 10/15/2013 rain 52 343 260 83 7530.62 6003.12 1527.5 0.16 10/16/2013 RAIN 50 280 355 -75 599321 7600.69 - 1607.48 -0.12 10/17/2013 SUN 55 316 275 41 5801.71 5429.45 372.26 -2.89 10/18/2013 PT SUN 55 543 306 237 14767.53 8041.03 6726.5 6.04 10/19/2013 dreary 52 563 501 62 14319.76 12273.28 2046.48 0.84 10/20/2013 546 -546 14083.3 - 14083.3 10/21/2013 ovrest40s 286 286 5969.49 5969.49 -0.02 10/22/2013 cldy 48 251 289 -38 4634.1 5314.81 - 680.71 -0.2 10/23/2013 pt sun 53 277 311 -34 5441.26 6199.49 - 758.23 0 10/24/2013 overcast 50 279 255 24 6111.15 5087.07 1024.08 016 10/25/2013 sun 40s 527 354 173 12583.36 7848.48 4734.88 1.04 10/26/2013 sun 40s 624 525 99 15394.29 12377.76 3016.53 -0.07 10/27/2013 626 -626 15597.37 - 15597.37 10/28/2013 sun 50 263 263 4387.94 4387.94 1.05 10/29/2013 cold drzl 40 306 247 59 7000.72 4485.24 2515.48 -0.05 10/30/2013 rain 40s 269 325 -56 5252.75 6778.98 - 1526.23 0.03 10/31/2013 damp 45 397 395 2 8942.63 8172.69 769.94 -1.42 Totals 10339 10357 -18 '' 234353 235106.1 -753.12 -3.58 -2539- Harbor Wine & Spirits 2013 Date Cust 13 Cust 12 Variance Sales 2013 Sales 2012 Difference +/- Cash +/- January 8,714 7,806 908 184,339.57 163,313.90 21,025.67 -12.93 February 8,614 8,133 481 200,423.60 180,009.40 20,414.20 -38.68 March 9,237 9,543 -306 207,569.80 214,285.70 - 6,715.90 -27.81 April 9,100 8,856 244 196,147.79 188,776.43 7,371.36 -6.49 May 10,590 10,655 -65 243,744.83 244,052.50 - 307.67 -52.24 June 10,827 12,072 -1,245 257,333.00 288,098.66 - 30,765.66 -30.46 July 12,196 12,431 -235 299,483.48 307,293.30 - 7,809.82 106.37 August 12,806 11,816 990 304,315.79 250,809.09 53,506.70 -26.92 September 10,183 10,688 -505 213,541.40 235,656.00 - 22,114.60 -28.83 October 10,339 10,357 -18 234,353.00 235,106.10 - 753.10 -3.58 November 10,021 - 10,021 233,225.40 - 233,225.40 December 11,224 - 11,224 294,301.44 - 294,301.44 Totals 102,606 123,602 - 20,996 2,341,252.26 �# -2540- - 493,675.66 - 121.57 93 Munic Code I Municipality Name Total #of. : pjDs 20 Bloomington 25,075 22 Brooklyn Center 7,171 48 Brooklyn Park 20,012 50 Champlin 6,887 14 Chanhassen 52 Corcoran 1,311 54 lCrystal 6,594 56 1 Dayton 1,186 59 IDeephaven 1,210 61 Eden Prairie 17,985 24 Edina 14,718 63 lExcelsior 479 28 IGolden Valley 6,752 65 lGreenfield 781 19 lGreenwood 282 67 lHanover 167 30 .Hopkins 3,797 70 Independence 888 72 Long Lake 533 74 Loretto 196 76 Maple Grove 19,968 77 Maple Plain 471 79 Medicine Lake 105 80 Medina 1,331 01 Minneapolis 82,951 34 Minnetonka 15,918 82 Minnetonka Beach 194 36 Minnetrista 1,776 85 Mound 3,394 86 New Hope 4,854 38 jOrono 2,522 88 Osseo 664 40 Plymouth 19,946 42 lRictifield 9,313 44 lRobbinscale 4,188 90 lRockford 66 92 Rogers 2,984 94 Saint Anthony 1,713 95 ISaint Bonifacius 783 46 Saint Louis Park 13,067 26 Shorewood 2,292 17 Spring Park 377 97 Tonka Bay 565 99 Wayzata 1.,181 15 Woodland 161 Suburban County 223,857 306,808 Note: A property (PID) is included in this table on A property (PID) is excluded from this table if it has an improvement amount, multiple taxable subrecords or a partial constuction indicator for proposed 2014 taxes (2013 assessmem). Hennepin County Property Tax Comparison • Based on Payable 2013 Taxes and Proposed 2014 TRUTH IN TAXATION RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES -2541- -K Munic Code Municipality Name Total # of plDs :! 20 Bloomington 25,075 22 Brooklyn Center 7,171 48 Brooklyn Park 20,012 50 Champlin 6,887 14 Chanhassen 52 Corcoran 1,311 54 Crystal 6,594 56 Dayton 1,186 59 Deephaven 1,210 61 Eden Prairie 17,985 24 Edina 14,718 63 Excelsior 479 28 Golden Valley 6,752 65 Greenfield 781 19 Greenwood 282 67 Hanover 167 30 Hopkins 3,797 70 Independence 888 72 Long Lake 533 74 Loretto 196 76 Maple Grove 19,968 77 Maple Plain 471 79 Medicine Lake 105 80 Medina 1,331 01 Minneapolis 82,951 34 Minnetonka 15,918 82 Minnetonka Beach 194 36 Minnetrista 1,776 85 'Mound 3,394 86 New Hope 4,854 38 Orono 2,522 88 Osseo 664 40 Plymouth 19,946 42 Richfield 9,313 44 Robbinsdale 4,188 90 Rockford 66 92 Rogers 2,984 94 Saint Anthony 1,713 95 Saint Bonifacius 783 46 Saint Louis Park 13,067 26 Shorewood 2,292 17 Spring Park 377 97 Tonka Bay 565 99 lWayzata 1,181 15 Woodland 161 Suburban 223,857 County 306,808 10 0.04% I 0.01/ 20 0.1 M/1 10 0.15% 69 5.26% 2 0.03° 46 3.88°/ 7 0.58° 175 0.97% 218 1.48% 5 1 -04% 52 0.77% 40 5.12% 43 15.25%, 28 16.77% 72 1.90% 55 6.190/1 18 3.38 0.00 128 0.64° 0.00° 0.00° 9 0.68M 452 0.54°/ 292 1.83°/ 85 43.81 58 3.27% 175 5.16% 1 0.02 % 201 7.97% 0.00% 112 0.56% 3 0.03% 21 0.50% 0.00% 36 1.21 % 0.00 % 3 : 0.38% 44 0.34° 113 4.93°/ 2 0.53°/ 60 10.62% 124 10.50°/ 28 17.39% ,366 1.06% .818 0.92% Hennepin County Property Tax Comparison - Based on Payable 2013 Taxes and Proposed 2014 TRUTH IN TAXATIM RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES Number and Percent of Property by Tax Change (559999) - (545000) # `.; % 28 0.11%1 24 0.33% 395 1.97% 134 1.95% (844999) ($300.00) z# %._ 240 0.96% 135 1.88% 1,507 7.53% 467 6.78% (839999) - ($15000) # % 1,615 6.44% 3,294 45.94% 4,753 23.75% 2,473 35.91% (6149.99) -$0.00 ` # % 11,460 45.71% 3,263 45.51% 7,476 37.37% 2,724 39.54% Tax Change 60.61- $150.00 ,. #: % "; 9,414 37.54% 379 5.29% 3,063 15.31% 707 10.27% $160.01- $J00.00 # % 1,827 7.29% 53 0.74% 2,103 10.51% 313 4.54% $JOO.OL 5450.00 # ;;% 381 1.52% 16 0.22 % 292 1.46% 48 0.70% $45001 $60000 # ': % 50 0.20% 4 0.06 %. 100 0.50% 2 0.03% $60001 - $750.00 # :. 4 31 0.12% 1 0.01 ° / 25 0.12% 1 0.01% $760.01 $900.00 # /° :: 7 0.03% 1 0.01% 7 0.03% 0.00% $90001 and over # °/4 d. 6 002% 0.00% 2 0.01% 0.00% ($P49.99) (560000) % 'r 0.02%1 0.00 % 1.34% 0.12% # F- 6 1 269 8 9.61% 0.08% 3.20% 171 18 60 5 142 96 2 75 110 16 12 34 24 12 273 1 3 743 220 11 - 88 65 30 69 3 121 111 236 t 59 54 17 107 31 2 30 43 2,933 3,676 13.04% 0.27% 5.06 %. 0.41% 0.79%: 0.65% 0.42% 1.11% 14.08% 5.67% 7.19% 0.90% 2.70% 2.25% 0.00% 1.37% 0.00% 0.95% 0.23% 0.90% 1.38% 5.67% 4.95% 1.92 %: 0.62% 2.74% 0.45% 0.61% 1.19% 5.64% 1.52% 1.98% 3,15% 2.17% 0.82% 1.35% 0.53% 5,31% 3.64% 0.00% 1.31% 1.20% 315 28 128 24 348 270 54 110 8 15 122 26 20 980 1 21 1,902 834 16 139 104 18 121 11 578 1,744 521 1 155 87 34 423 61 2 17 61 2 9,748 17,650. 24.03% 0.42% 10.79% 1.98% 1.93% 1.83% 0.00% 0.80% 14.08% 2.84% 8.98% 3.21% 2.93% 3.75% 0.00% 4.91% 0.21% 0.00% 1.58% 2.29% 5.24% 8.25% 7.63% 3.06% 0.37% 4.80% 1.66% 2.90% 18.73% 12.44% 1.52% 5.19% 5.08% 4.34% 3.24% 2.66% 0,53% 3.01 % 5.17% 1.24% 4.35% 3.80% 158 223 170 64 1,951 873 25 304 111 19 21 844 52 143 5,815 7 125 9,328 1,622 30 414 367 170 211 251 2,029 2,538 1,187 6 467 315 237 2,168 236 84 12 236 24 35,644 44,972 12.05% 3.38 %I 14.33% 5.29 %I 10.85 %'. 5.93% 5.22% 4.50% 14.21% 6.74% 12.57% 22.23% 5.86% 26.83% 0.00% 29.12% 0.00 %. 6.67% 9.39% 11.25% 10.19% 15.46% 23.31% 10.81% 3.50% 8.37% 37.80% 10.17% 27.25% 28.34% 9.09% 15.65% 18.39% 30.27% 16.59% 10.30% 22.28% 2.12% 19.98% 14.91% 15.92% 14.66% 189 2,842 551 233 2,856 3,438 107 1,766 164 48 54 1,065 214 178 34 7,687 38 26 334 43,321 3,303 33 517 886 515 794 258 5,223 3,420 1,634 45 1,122 322 174 3,570 515 73 104 377 30 69,662 112,983 14.42% 43.09% 46.47% 19.25% 15.90% 2337% 22.34% 26.16% 21.01% 17.02% 32.33% 28.05% 24.10% 33.39% 17.35% 38.48% 8.07% 24.76% 25.09% 52.23% 20.76% 17.01 % 29.10% 26.10% 10.61% 31.48% 3885% 26.18% 36.73% 39.00% 68.17% 37.59% 18.79% 22.23% 27.32% 22.47% 19.35% 18.40% 31.92% 18.64°/ 31.13% 36.81% 243 3,213 170 534 10,184 6,887 175 3,010 88 80 10 1,196 157 118 10 4,196 126 36 259 16,014 4,849 3 307 968 2,494 498 128 6,609.33.13% 1,456 428 12 648 563 178 3,790 578 155 186 226 43 68,374 84,388 18.54% 48.73% 14.33% 44.13 % 56.62 %. 46.79%. 36.53% 44.58%: 11.27% 28.37% 5.99% 31.50% 17.68% 22.14% 5.10% 21.01% 26.75% 34.29% 19.46% 19.31% 30.46% 1.55 % 17.29% 28.52% 51.38% 19.75% 19 28% 15.63% 10.22% 18.18% 21.72% 32.87% 22.73% 29.00% 25.22% 41.11% 32.92% 19.14% 26.71% 30.54% 27.51% 34 226 13 173 1,726 1,848 128 576 32 16 310 123 8 92 632 194 30 95 7,872 3,174 2 89 -;7709 759 293 9 3,540 20 59 1 214 355 91 1,999 238 20 71 37 11 22,243 30,115 2.59% 3.43% 1..10°/ 14.30% 9.60% 12.56% 26.72% 8.53% 4.10% 5.67% 0.00% 8.16% 13.85% 1.50% 46.94% 3.17% 41.19% 28.57% 7.14% 9.49% 19.94% 1.03 ° / 5.01% 20.89% 15.64% 11.62% 136% 17.75% 0.21% 1.41% 1.52% 7.17% 20.72% 11.62% 15.30% 10.38% 5.31% 12.57 %' 3.13% 6.83% 9.94% 9.82% 3 5 6 67 322 570 9 432 36 15 60 102 5 49 135 98 4 155 1,769 918 51 54 827 101 2 1,264 7 21 215 10 30 624 259 32 26 5 4 7,260 9,029 0.23% 0.08% 0.51% 5.54% 1.79% 3.87% 1.88% 6.40% 4.61% 5.32% 0.00% 1.58 %. 11.49% 0.94% 25.00% 0.68% 20.81% 3.81% 11.65% 2.13% 5.77% 0.00% 2.87% 1.59% 17.04% 4.00% 030% 6.34% 0.08% 0.50% 0.00%: 7.21% 0.58% 3.83% 4.78% 11.30% 8.49% 4.60% 0.42 % 2.48% 3.24% 2.94% 1 2 3 31 132 171 6 214 14 7 59 62 8 6 21 13 1 43 523 279 1 31 8 28 43 2 259 2 12 14 2 2 148 73 5 14 8 5 1,886 2,409 0.08% 0.03% 0.25 %' 2.56% 0.73% 1.16°/ 1.25% 3.17% 1.79% 2.48% 0.00% 1.55% 6.98% 1.50% 3.06% 0.11% 276% 0.95% 3.23% 0.63% 1.75% 0.52% 1.75% 0.24% 0.58% 1.70% 0,30 %' 1.30 %. 0,02% 0.29% 0.00% 0.47% 0.12% 0.26% 1,13% 3.18% 1.33% 2.48% 0.68% 3.11% 0.84% 0.79% 2 14 18 50 95 2 63 6 2 5 24 6 4 6 1 75 207 115 2 14 2 3 28 69 8 6 1 11 75 40 4 3 3 815 1,022 0.15% 0.21 %. 0.00% 1.49% 018% 0.65% 0.42% 0.93% 0.77% 0.71% 0.00% 0.13% 2.70% 1.13% 2.04% 0.03% 0.21% 0.00% 5.63% 0.25% 0,72% 1.03% 0.79% 0.06% 0.06% 1.11% 0 00% 0.35% 0.00 ° / 0.19% 0.00% 0.20% 0.06% 1.40% 0.57% 1.75% 0.00 °! 0.71% 0.25% 1.86% 0.36% 0.33% 3 1 12 17 48 1 28 4 1 1 4 3 5 61 144 69 6 4 2 15 32 : 4 3 1 1 36 27 4 2 410 554 0.00% 0.05% 0 -OB °/ 0.99% O.09%1 0.33% 0.21% 0.41% 0.51% 0.30% 0.00% 0.03% 0.45% 0.56% 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 4.58% 0.17% 0.43% 0.00% 0.34% 0.12% 0.04% 0.59% 0.00% 0.16% 0.00% 0.10% 0.00% 0.10% 0.06% 0.13% 0.28% 1.18% 0.00% 0.71% 0.17% 0.00% G.18% 0.18% 13 40 29 152 19 49 13 21 5 18 12 1 6 149 318 108 34 3 6 110 28 1 4 2 1 34 94 1 8 4 9 982 7,300 0.00% 0.20% 0.00% 3.31% 0.16% 1.03% 3.97% 0.73% 1.66% 7.45% 0.00% 0.13% 2.03% 2.25% 0.51% 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% 11.19% 0.38% 0.68 %. 0.00% 1.91% 0.09% 0,12% 4.36°/ 0.00% 0.14% 0.01% 0.10° 0.00% 0.07% 0.06% 0.00% 0.26% 4.10% 0.27% 1.42% 0.34% 5.59% 0.44% 0.42% 126 5 38 2 0.17% 53 0,29%1 52 0.35%1 129 0.00% 1.91% 53 6.79% -- 6 2.13% 16.17% 0.63% 3.04% 0.38% 0.00% 0.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.15% 0.43% 27 24 27 2 84 2 358 135 0.85% 11 5.67% 1.44% 0.02% 1.51% 0.00% 0.41% 0.12% 1.27% 0.00% 1.44% B381.58% 53 43 2 0.12% 0.64% 0.37% 1.18% 5 49 27 1 0.27 %. 5.13% 4.66% 1.24% G.69% 29 55 2 1,534 1,892 0.62% Note: A property (PID) is included in this table only if it has the same homestead /non- homestead classification for both tax years (payable 2013 and proposed 2014). A property (PID) is excluded from this table if it has an improvement amount, multiple taxable subrecords or a partial constuction indicator for proposed 2014 taxes (2013 assessment). -2542- Munic Code Municipality Name Total # of PIDs 20 Bloomington 701 22 Brooklyn Center 159 48 Brooklyn Park 377 50 Champlin 101 14 Chanhassen 15 52 Corcoran 48 54 ICrystal 139 56 1 Dayton 45 59 IDeephaven 23 61 1 Eden Prairie 497 24 jEdina 365 63 Excelsior 77 28 Golden Valley 264 65 Greenfield 23 19 Greenwood 4 67 Hanover 1 30 Hopkins 246 70 Independence 13 72 Long Lake 70 74 Loretto 24 76 Maple Grove 454 77 Maple Plain 50 79 Medicine Lake 1 80 Medina 108 01 Minneapolis 3,548 34 Minnetonka 388 82 Minnetonka Beach 36 Minnetrista 2 85 Mound 51 86 New Hope 173 38 Orono 34 88 Osseo 92 40 Plymouth 527 42 Richfield 178 44 Robbinsdale 76 90 Rockford 9 92 Rogers 222 94 Saint Anthony 54 95 Saint Bonifacius 33 46 Saint Louis Park 563 26 Shorewood 21 17 Spring Park 42 97 Tonka Bay 8 99 Wayzata 86 15 Woodland Suburban 6,364 -County 9,912 Hennepin County Property Tax Comparison - Based on Payable 2013 Taxes and Proposed 2014 TRUTH IN TAXATION COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES (excluding vacant land) Number Percent of Property by tPeicent of Tax !Change i less than '+ # P31 (- 20.0°/0) % 2.71% 0.00 ° /a 8.22% 0.99% 6.67% 0.00% 1.44% 0.00% 0.00% 0,20% 3.29% 1.30% 0.38% 0,00% 0.00 %. 0.00% 0.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.66% 2.00% 0.00 °l0 3.70% 1.94% 0.77% °0 7.84% (19.9% # 5 1 17 1 8 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 28 1 1 1 2 2 4 3 57 85 - (15.0%) % 0.71% 0,63% 4.51% 0,00% 6.67% 0.00% 5.76% 2.22% 0.00% 0.20% 0.27% 0.00% 0.00% 8.70% 0.00% 0.00% 1.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.22% 2.00% 0.00 ° /a 0.93% 0.79% 0.26% 0.00% 1.96% 0.58% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.00% 2.63% 0.00% 1.80 ° /a 0.00% 0.00% 0.53 %. 0.00% 0.00% 0,00°/0 0,00% 0.90% 0.86% (14.9 %) # 9 3 47 3 15 1 4 8 1 7 11 6 5 61 6 7 5 2 9 7 1 1 158 219 - (10.0 %) % 1.28% 1.89% 12.47% 2.97% 0.00% 0.00% 10.79% 2.22% 0.00/ 0,00% 1.10% 0.00% 3.03% 4.35% 0.00% 0.00% 2.85°/0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 2.42% 12.00% 0.00% 4.63% 1.72% 1.55% 0.00% 0.00% 4.05% 0,00% 0.00% 0.00 ° /° 2.81% 2.63% 0.00% 4.05 ° /a 0.00% 0.00% 4.24% 0.00% 2.38% 0,00% 1.16% 2.48% 2.21% (9.9°/0) ' # 16 5 54 6 1 28 2 8 25 3 1 1 13 1 32 2 4 137 6 27 1 5 18 2 1 20 7 1 1 1 292 429 - (5.0% '% 2.28% 3.14% 14.32% 5.94% 0.00% 2.08% 20.14% 4.44% 0.00% 1.61% 6.85% 0.00% 1.1.4% 4.35% 25.00% 0.00% 5.28% 0.00% 1.43% 0.00% 7.05% 4.00°/0 0.00% 3.70% 3.86% 1.55% 0.00% 0.00 ° /a 15.61% 0.00°/0 1.09% 0.95% 10.11% 2,63% 11.11% 9.01% 0.00% 0.00% 1.24% 4.76°/° 2.38% 0.00% 1.16% 4.59% 4.33% (4.9% # 86 40 125 9 3 11 74 28 1 2 10 1 11 1 74 8 8 182 38 13 3 3 17 6 5 22 32 26 5 2 661 843 Chan - 0.0% % '' 12.27% 25.16% 33.16% 891% 20.00% 0.00% 7.91% 0.00% 0.00% 14.89°/° 7.67% 1.30% 0.76% 43.48% 25.00% 0.00% 4.47% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% 16.30% 16.00% 0.00% 7.41 % 5.13 ° /a 9.79% 0.00% 0.00% a .1%-4.9% # 528 93 81 79 8 37 75 40 23 373 135 68 239 7 2 1 204 12 69 21 251 32 1 72 2,689 277 46 1 1 31 88 434 143 44 4 135 54 391 11 34 8 79 4,353 7,042 % 75.32% 58.48% 21.48% 78.22% 53.32% 7209% 53.96% 88.90°/0 100.00% 75.06% 36.98% 88.31% 90.52% 30.42% 50.00% 100.00% 82.92°/0 92.31% 98.57% 87.50% 55.29% 64.00% 100.00% 66.67% 75.79% 71.39% 100.000 5.0% # 22 8 9 1 1 7 36 52 5 5 2 1 2 75 9 210 42 1 1 61 4 4 3 9 108 2 3 473 683 - 9.9°/0 % 3.14% 5.03% 2.39% 0.99% 6.67% 14.58% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.24°/° 14.25% 6.49% 1.89% 870% 0.00% 0.00% 0.41% 0.00% 0 -00% 8.33% 16.52% 0.00% 0.00% 8.33% 5.92% 10.82% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58% 0.00% 1.09% 11.57% 2.25% 5.26% 33.33°/0 4,05% 0.00% 0 -00% 19.18 %' 9,52% 0.00% 0.00% 3.49% 7.43 % 6.89°/° 10.0% # 11 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 38 1 1 4 1 6 2 59 6 1 1 3 1 2 9 7 1 2 107 166 - 14.9% % 1.57% 0.63% 1.06% 0.99% 6.67% 2,08% 0.00% 2.22% 0.00% 0.20% 10.41% 1.30% 0.38% 0.00% 0.00 %. 0,00°/0 1,63% 0.00% 0.00% 4.17% 1.32% 0.00% 0.00% 1.85% 1.66% 1.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58% 0.00% 1.09% 0.57% 0.56% 2.63 °l0 0.00 %. 4.05% 0.00% 0.00% - 1.24% 4.76% 4.76% 0.00% 0.00°/0 1.68 % 1.67% 15.0% # 3 4 2 1 14 1 3 3 46 4 1 2 8 2 4 1 1 54 100 - 19.9% % 0.43% 2.52% 0.53% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0..00% 0.00% 0.20% 3.84% 1.30% 1.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0,00 %'.. 0.00 %' 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0,00% 0,00% 2.78% 1.30% 1.03% 0.00% 0.00% 0.58% 0.00% 0.00% 0.38% 0.00% 10.53% 0.00% 0.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.71 %' 4.76% 0.00% 0.00% 1.16% 0.85% 1.01% 20.0% # 2 4 7 1 2 2 56 2 1 1 67 5 1 2 6 5 6 103 170 and over ':% 0.29% 2.52% 1.86% 0.99% 0.00% 4.17% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.40°/0 15.34% 0.00% 0.76 ° /a 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 ° /a 0.41% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.22% 0.00% 000% 0.00% 1.89% 1.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.000.00°/0 1.09% 0.38% 0.00% 7.89% 0.00% 2.25% 0.00% 0,00% 1.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 % 0.00% 1.62 1.72% 1 12 1 1 2 3 1 4 69 3 4 90.20% 7.5 % 8.82°/° 0.00% 3.23% 3.37% 6,58% 0.00% 9.91.% 0.00% 96.97% 4.62% 23.81% 4.76% 0,00% 0.00% 10.39% 8.50% 69.93% 91.18% 95.64% 82.35% 80.34% 57.90% 44.45% 60.83% 100.00% 0.00% 69.46% 52.39% 80.96% 100.00°/° 91.87% 68.39 % 71.04% o 0.00% - 019% 0.56% 1.32% 11.11% 3.15% 0.00% 3.03% 0.71% 0.00% 4.76% 0,00% 1.16% 1.67% 1.77% 1 1 1 1 7 1 4 2 1 106 175 Note: A property (PID) is excluded from this table if it has an improvement amount, multiple taxable subrecordS or a partial constuction indicator for proposed 2014 taxes (2013 assessment). Only property of type "C" or I" are included in this table. -2544- c= 0 _2 z^ 7 ti O N GJ T R d %d w L W H Ca N F W y � y U� by M W � H � N 5 Y �w ao R H U jam] a b y V rr H R p.a - .. M a 0 0 0 o m N i y J N? R F �xx 0 O v E M N p r -2545- j H. Oa- ,mnNNv a3adaml O O O O O O O O m O O U') O M N O O HIMOND TdnNNV a3.ldotaNf O 0) • �1 N_ O N O O O m O YJ ^ N r 0 O N O N O r 0 _O 2 W Q. cn N _N O N 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O m i y O R F E M N p r -2545- H. Oa- ,mnNNv a3adaml mE --N� °000 v N fV r d C o 0 0 o e p p m V 0 0 0 O m ❑�❑ e o 0 0 0 y F b as XI c r N N M W ^ r r Ali i L N M N O O vl O o w 4 b w z z o w ¢o¢ qW�z� Q W o U .a � a m l ZAJ r oO °o v yy ^ N In O O N � M � e i W�WzzgW ao¢aWOz U v w x a r 0 0 a F 0 L 0 m�a V 0 0 0 O m i y O R F � e i W�WzzgW ao¢aWOz U v w x a r 0 0 a F 0 L 0 i y R E M N p � e i W�WzzgW ao¢aWOz U v w x a r 0 0 a F 0 L 0