The URL can be used to link to this page

2014-05-27 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 27, 2014 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda. Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removedfrom the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims *B. Approve minutes: May 13, 2014 regular meeting *C. Approve permits for Tour de Tonka, with pit stop at Wolner Field, with fees paid 1. Public Gathering Permit 2. Live Music Permit *D. Approve Public Gathering Permit for Fishers of Men Bass Tournament at Centerview Beach, with fees paid: Aug 23, 2014 *E. Approve Pay Request by Advanced Wall Structures, Inc, for Emergency Retaining Wall Replacement at 5097 Three Points Boulevard, in the amount of $33,210.00 *F. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for 6260 Birch Lane, PID #14 -117 -24 -32 -0040 *G. Approve Resolutions for 2201 Centerview Lane, PID #13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 1. Resolution Approving Minor Subdivision at 2201 Centerview Lane - Planning Case No. 14 -05 2. Resolution Approving Variances at 2201 Centerview Lane — Planning Case No. 14 -06 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) Page 1010 -1027 1028 -1034 1035 1036 1037 -1038 1039 -1040 1041 -1065 1066 -1094 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 6. Steve McDonald, representing Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP, presenting the 2013 1095 -1096 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and Management Letter, and requesting Action receiving the same (see separate report) 7. Jay Green, Mound representative to the LMCD, requesting action on Right -of -Entry 1097 for Surfside ramp access to allow watercraft inspectors to perform inspections for the 2014 boating season providing: A. Summary of inspection data from 2013 B. AIS prevention literature 8. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer, with update on costs to move 1098 -1100 City Hall and upgrade the Centennial Building for rentals 9. Mark Wegscheid, Council Member, on the process of providing packets to Council 1101 Members 10. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, on the City's involvement in ribbon cuttings and 1102 ground breakings 11. Kandis Hanson, City Manager, requesting discussion and any action on remembrance 1103 for former Senator Steve Smith 12. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: C. Reports: Bolton & Menk Engineering: Dec 2013 YTD 1104 -1106 Mar 2014 YTD 1107 -1108 Finance Dept: 2014 YTD 1109 -1110 D. Correspondence: Letter from Metropolitan Council with population 1111 -1112 Estimate: May 15, 2014 2014 Westonka DARE Open 1113 13. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. citi�nfi�r�iWhl coin 2014 04- 14BOLTMNK $ 96,884.55 2014 052714CITY $ 96,098.15 2014 052714HWS $ 79,329.84 TOTAL CLAIMS 4444 Fl CffY OF €fiIC1UND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 04- 14BOLTMNK User Dollar Amt $96,884.55 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $96,884.55 $0.00 In Balance Refer 4 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166030 4/3012014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166032 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166033 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43112 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166034 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166025 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166023 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0166035 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166036 4130/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166024 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -300 Professional Srvs MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT ENGINEERING SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROD. PW 12- 01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1201 UPDATE STREET & UTILITY MAPS ENGINEERING THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project 14-4 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU ARIL 11 2014 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW13- 01 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW 1301 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13- 06 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1306 WATER SYSTEM MODELING ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Invoice 0166027 4130/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD FAIRFIELD RD SKETCHPLAN REVIEW -ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Invoice 0166026 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Refer 5 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166031 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0166038 4/3012014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166037 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166039 4/30/2014 05/22114 11:07 AM Page 1 $1,567.50 $290.00 $98.00 $196.00 $5,133.50 $4,003.00 $18,428.00 $1,634.50 $1,197.75 $89.00 $72.50 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32,709.75 GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU APRIL 112014 $110.00 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PRO.. PW14- $44,903.00 01 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1401 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ $5,352.50 PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1404 2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 $9,497.30 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project P W 1403 -1011- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166040 4/30/2014 Cash Payment E 427 - 43121 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0166041 4/3012014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166042 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 427 SEAL COAT FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 05/22/14 11:07 AM Page 2 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN $2,825.00 REPLACE PROD PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Pr oject PW1408 2014 CRACK & SEALCOAT IMPROV PROJ. $101.50 PW 14 -06 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW1406 2015 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW15 -03 $1,385.50 ENG SVC THRU APRIL 11 2014 Project PW 1503 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64,174.80 10100 Wells Fargo $4,185.50 $63,527.00 $1,567.50 $101.50 $4,022.75 $17,748.80 $5,731.50 $96,884.55 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $96,884.55 Total $96,884.55 -1012- -1013- .__...` CITY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM — .— . Page 1 Payments CITY OFMOUND Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 052714CITY User Dollar Amt $96,098.15 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $96,098.15 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 3D SPECIALTIES - Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 48 YELLOW T- SHIRTS W/ MOUND LOGO ON $1,123.67 POCKETS Invoice 445197 5/7/2014 Project 14 -5 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,123.67 Refer 2 ALLIED GENERATORS _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs GENERATOR REPAIR LABOR $210.00 Invoice 5634 5/6/2014 Project 14 -5 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $210.00 Refer 3 ALPHA RUG AND CARPET CLEANI _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services CARPET CLEANING- PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG- $350.00 SQUAD ROOM, EXERCISE, ROOM, LOWER LEVEL, ALL HALLS Invoice 2864 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $350.00 Refer 4 AMSAN _ Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -460 Janitorial Services CREDIT PREV ORDER FD -$6.91 Invoice 310418033 5/5/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services 10 PERMANENT USE FLOOR MATS- CITY $3,660.00 HALL ENTRY AREAS Invoice 310418033 5/5/2014 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,653.09 Refer 43 ANCOMCOMMUNICATIONS� Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -325 Pagers -Fire Dept. MINITOR V PROGRAMMING KIT $236.00 Invoice 45005 5/2/2014 PO 24290 Transaction Date 5122/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $236.00 .., ,.�.. .., Refer ...� ....... ... .. ....... ... 5 APACHE GROUP _ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, CUPS $457.01 Invoice 172651 5/1212014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE, CUPS $457.01 Invoice 172651 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CREDIT- RETURN C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET - $403.86 TISSUE Invoice 172651 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CREDIT - RETURN C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET - 5403.86 TISSUE Invoice 172651 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE $404.04 Invoice 172742 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -220 Repair /Maint Supply C -FOLD TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE $404.04 Invoice 172742 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 11 ,,.,.„,, Wells Fargo 10100 Total I, $914.38 ., ... 1 111,11, . -_, ,,,.w ..... 1 . ,. Refer 53 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY n, -...w .- I - l _ I'll - I I . - 11 , . „. 11 1 1 ,,.. -1013- CiTY OF [40UND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 2 Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maintenance SERVICE GLEN ELYN LIFT STATION 5-7-14 - $358.90 ATS POWER FAILURE-CHANGED INPUT CONTACT Invoice 276e0 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 1 11 Wells Fargo 10100 Total "1 1.1111, 111,1 111-11111 1 -111, 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 -1 11 1-11 1-1-1111-1. Refer ,1111 .. 111111.11 -1 "I'll, , 6 BAILEY NURSERIES, INC. .....,,.».,., -.,a, 11 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 35 TREES FOR STREETSCAPE & PARKS Invoice 0372097 5/13/2014 PO 24357 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 7 BERGQUIST, RODGER Cash Payment R 601-49400-37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND- 2645 HALSTEAD LANE Invoice 05272014 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 8 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-41930-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1170734 5/3/2014 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1172735 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer — 10 _CEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPAN Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials Invoice 1352010 5/7/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer u 9 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/2112014 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 412112014 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/2112014 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4121/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 05272014 4/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 55 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials Invoice 140515 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Refer 38 DAHM, DOUGLAS Wells Fargo 10100 COFFEE MACHINE EQUIP LEASE- MAY JUNE, JULY 2014 CITY HALL COFFEE & CREAMER FIRE DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 TWO 5 GAL CURE & SEAL Wells Fargo 10100 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 Total Total $358,90 $901.30 $901.30 $125.00 $125.00 $45.00 $120.00 $165,00 $218.15 Total $218.15 $681.16 $681.16 $680.59 $866.52 $1,461.10 Project 14-3 $312.48 GAS SVC 3-20-14 TO 4-21-14 DEPOT BLDG $187.93 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,870.94 DURA DRIVE HOTMIX 23.13 TONS $1,259.42 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,259.42 g1 m CITY OF MOUND 05/22/141:51 PM ----- - Page 3 Payments e tTY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND- 5108 $275.00 EDGEWATER- D. DAHM Invoice 05272014 5/19/2014 Transaction Date 5/2112014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $275.00 Refer 44 DOCK MASTERS OF LAKE MTKA, I _ Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL MULTIPLE DOCK SLIPS $6,356.00 Invoice 202558 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -220 Repair /Maint Supply NEW & USED MUD PLATES- HIGHLAND & $162.50 TWIN PARKS Invoice 202559 5120/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,518.50 Refer 11 DURKIN, DAVID _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL/REPAIR TIMBER RETAINING WALL- $3,500.00 2063 COMMERCE BLVD- INSURANCE RECVD Invoice 05272014 5/1512014 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,500.00 Refer 12 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Cash Payment E475-46386-300 Professional Srvs TIF 1 -3 CONSULTING & ADVISORY SVCS- $1,998.75 APRIL 2014 Invoice 348185 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,998.75 Refer EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, INC.__ _ _45 Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -329 Sirens /Phone Linesl 3 EMERGENCY SIRENS- 6 MO MTCE FEE- $753.12 JULY 1 THRU DEC 31 2014 Invoice 33482 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $753.12 Refer 46 EMERGENCY APPARA TUS MAINT _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair FLEX DRAW LATCH FOR HALE CHIEF 2 $28.95 FLOTO PUMP Invoice 74240 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $28.95 Refer 54 EMERYS TREE SERVICE, INCORP _ Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -533 Tree Removal REMOVE TREES ALONG ACCESS RD 5 -14 -14 $1,945.00 Invoice 19224 5/19/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,945.00 Refer 41 FINANCEAND COMMERCE _ Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -351 Legal Notices Publishing ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROJ $189.59 PW 14 -01 Invoice 741586685 511912014 Project PW1401 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.59 Refer 47 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES I _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic COAT ADVANCE CLEANING & $109.95 INSPECTIONS- HENTGES & STEVENS- LION TOTAL CARE Invoice 8341 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.95 Refer 42 FRED HOLASEK & SON, INC _ -1015- 43 T `t` OF 1,11OUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 4 Cash Payment G 101 -22808 Adopt A Green Space FLOWERS - PLANTS FOR DEPOT & $310.00 SURFSIDE PARK- JAYCEES ADOPT A GREEN SPACE Invoice 00016332 5/17/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Refer 14 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006289994 5/5/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006221716 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301231 5/1212014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006301231 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/1912014 Refer 13 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006301233 5/1212014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006221717 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006221717 3/2412014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006221709 3/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006301226 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006312581 5/1912014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006301234 5112/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006301234 5/12/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $310.00 UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 5 -05 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -05 -14 $139.51 Project 14 -3 $42.53 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 $408.58 Project 14 -3 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 $25.21 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 $25.65 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 $36.84 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -12 -14 $182.94 Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $994.13 MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 CITY HALL $58.94 UNIFORM SVC 3 -24 -14 PARKS $42.53 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 PARKS $65.27 MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 LIQUOR STOREMAT SVC $69.98 & SUPPLIES 3 -24 -14 HWS MAT SVC 5 -12 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 MAT SVC 5 -19 -14 LIQUOR STORE $69.98 SHOP SUPPLIES 5 -12 -14 PARKS $75.11 UNIFORM SVC 5 -12 -14 PARKS $52.11 -1016- CITY OF MOUND Payments Cr ,TY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 5 Current Period: May 2014 Transaction Date 511912014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $503.90 Refer 15 GUSTAFSON, BRUCE Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 05272014 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5119/2014 m Refer 16 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice C351205 5/2/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice C337901 4/30/2014 P024356 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 18 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATIO _Refer Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -418 Other Rentals Invoice 1000045230 511/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals Invoice 1000045162 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 17 HERREID & ASSOCIATES Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 1002 5112/2014 2014 BOOT ALLOWANCE REIMB- B. $150.00 GUSTAFSON Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 GPS COMMAND LINK- SENSUS METERING $7.92 SYSTEM 4 HYDRATFINDER FLAG MARKERS, SOCKET $103.40 DRIVER, QUIK CAP Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.32 PIN RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $127.20 APRIL 2014 Project 14 -3 FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $790.26 ADMINISTRATION FEE - APRIL 2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.46 LABOR RELATIONS SVC- PUBLIC $905.00 WORKS /PARKS FEB & MARCH 2014 Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SVC -CITY HALL APRIL & $3,077.26 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014 MAY 2014 Invoice 1002 5/12/2014 $269.75 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,982.26 Refer 19 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _ 2201 CENTERVIEW LN SUBDV PLANNING Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2014 $1,542.17 Invoice 007- 001 -72 5/9/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23297 JESBERG -1728 FINCH LN -P 1728 FINCH LN VARIANCE PLANNING SVCS Cash Payment G 101 -23296 FRIEDRICHSON- FAIRFIELD 5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBD PLANNING SVCS $41.50 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014 APRIL 2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23298 BENCHMARK -2308 DRIFTW 2308 DRIFTWOOD EXPAN PLANNING SVCS $166.00 APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 519/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23299 PELLETT -6260 BIRCH LN 1 6260 BIRCH LANE VARIANCE PLANNING $269.75 SVCS APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 51912014 Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C 2201 CENTERVIEW LN SUBDV PLANNING $62.25 SVCS APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23297 JESBERG -1728 FINCH LN -P 1728 FINCH LN VARIANCE PLANNING SVCS $166.00 APRIL 2014 Invoice 007 - 005 -68 5/9/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total , $2,247.67 _ . _ Refer 20 HOME DEPOT /GECF (PiWj _ 1017- CMY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: May 2014 05122/14 1*51 PM Page 6 Cash Payment E 602-49450-223 Building Repair Supplies .COM COMPRESSOR- SIGN SHOP $99.97 Invoice 1086103 4/18/2014 Project 14-3 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.97 Refer 21 INFRATECH Cash Payment Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic VAC DEBRIS- WATER TOWER CLEANING 4- $2,350.00 BEACHWOOD RD 24-14 5/16/2014 Invoice 140253 4124/2014 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic JET VAC CLEANING 4-30-14 $822.50 Invoice 140261 4/3012014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,172,50 Refer 22 JENKS, GUY Cash Payment R 601-49400-37144 Sales of Meters & Rea DEDUCT METER REFUND -6120 $125.00 BEACHWOOD RD Invoice 05272014 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 23 JESSENPRESS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41110-350 Printing PRINT, MAIL-CITY CONTACT NEWS 8 PG $1,400.00 MAY-JUNE-JULY 2014 6,000 COPIES Invoice 42116 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,400.00 Refer 48 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional SNs HRA LEGAL SVCS- DEVELOPER DAY MTGS, $224,00 ASSISTED LIVING PROPOSAL- APRIL 2014 Invoice 120112 5/2012014 Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Sws 2014 TIF 1-3 SPECIAL LEGISLATION -LEGAL $42.00 SVCS APRIL 2014 Invoice 120112 5/20/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $266.00 Refer 56 LAKE RESTORATION, INC. Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic SHORELINE DR POND TREATMENT #1- $216.00 DUCKWEED, SUBMERGED WEEDS & ALGAE Invoice 112179 4/29/2014 Transaction Date 512212014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $216.00 Refer 24 LIBERTY TITLE INC. -ELK RIVER Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT-4431 $358.65 DENBIGH D. NELSON Invoice 05272014 5/1512014 Transaction Date 5/15/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $358.65 Refer 25 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $75.89 OVERAGE - 4/14/14 TO 5113/14 Invoice 1747136 5/512014 Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BNV $189.11 OVERAGE - 4/14/14 TO 5/13/14 Invoice 1747136 5/5/2014 Transaction Date 2/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ......... $265.00 Refer 49 MAAS, JASON . -1018- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM - ` -�� Page 7 Payments MY OF i40UND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies DUTY UNIFORM SHOES- REIMB J. MAAS $38.24 Invoice 05272014 5/21/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $38.24 Refer 26 MEDIACOM Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 5 -16 -14 THRU 6- $85.90 15 -14 Invoice 05272014 5/612014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CHARGE $0.57 Invoice 05272014 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.47 Refer 39 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTYMANA _ Cash Payment E 101-41310-433 Dues and Subscriptions MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL- CITY MGR K. $138.00 HANSON- CITY MGMT ASSOC Invoice 05272014 5121/2014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $138.00 Refer 27 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH _ _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -37170 State fee - Water 2ND QTR 2014 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,793.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Invoice 05272014 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,793.00 Refer 57 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPA _ Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials CSS- IH ASPHALT EMULSION $262.00 Invoice 70465 5/13/2014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $262.00 Refer 28 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib MAY 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,250.00 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 05272014 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 _Refer 29 NS/1 MECHANICAL CONTRACTING, _ Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic PREVENTIVE MTCE AGREEMENT MAY THRU AUG 2014 CENT BLDG Invoice C003296 518/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 I'll, 1 .11 11-1 11111, 1-1111-11, 11 1. - - - � Refer 37 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER, COLOR INK, 9V ALK BATTERIES- FD Invoice 710243782001 4/23/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Refer 36 OFFICEDEPOT Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 710243782001 4/23/2014 PO 23451 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Refer 30 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 60249450 -322 Postage Invoice 140439 5/11/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 2 ERGONOMIC OFFICE CHAIRS- HWS Wells Fargo 10100 APRIL 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE -1019- Total $12,250.00 $1,228.00 Total $1,228.00 $104.21 Total $104.21 $439.98 Total $439.98 $325.97 CITY OF MOUND Payments CffY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM Page 8 Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute APRIL 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,804.47 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140439 5/11/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute APRIL 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,804.47 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140439 5/1112014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 140439 5/11/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 31 PREMIUM WATERS, INC Cash Payment E 101 -41310 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 603679 -04 -14 4/30/2014 APRIL 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $325.97 Wells Fargo 10100 5- 5 GAL WATER HOT & COLD WATER COOLER- CITY MGR Total $4,260.88 $39.74 Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -440 Other Contractual Servic MAY THRU JULY 2014 HOT & COLD WATER $68.85 Cash Payment COOLER- SQUAD ROOM ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROD - Invoice 614850 -04 -14 4/30/2014 LEGAL NTCE 5 -17 -14 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies PUB WKS HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 Transaction Date 5/2012014 RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014 Refer Invoice 614851 -04 -14 4/3012014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -210 Operating Supplies CITY HALL HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014 Invoice 05272014 Invoice 614850 -04 -14 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 512012014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -210 Operating Supplies CENT BLDG HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 RENTAL MAY THRU JULY 2014 E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 604558 -04 -14 4/30/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 >N- Wells Fargo 10100 Total - w.-,n. , 11 , , ,., , $315.14 „. ..,. - .. —., , ... -.a,b — .... , - -. 32 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY -e- -"',- ',,, _Refer Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE 5 -3 -14- STORMWATER $42.41 POLLUTION PREVENT MTG Invoice 98272 51312014 Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -351 Legal Notices Publishing ADV FOR BIDS 2014 STREET IMPROV PROD - LEGAL NTCE 5 -17 -14 Invoice 102603 5/1712014 Project PW1401 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 33 SWARTZER, BRIAN _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms REPAIR CHAIN SAW CHAPS- SEW LIKE NEW -REIMB B. SWARTZER Invoice 05272014 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 512012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 34 SWEEPER SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts SIDE BOOM RETAINER- STREET SWEEPER Invoice 14066 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 50 TRI TECH DISPENSING _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair WIRE IN COMPRESSOR STARTER KIT Invoice 49282 51712014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 59 UHL COMPANY _ -1020- Total Total $139.44 $181.85 $18.67 $18.67 $175.68 $175.68 $278.00 $278.00 CITY OF MOUND 05/22/141:51 PM "- Page 9 \ Payments »!TY CIF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260402 Building Maintenance REPAIR MOTOR ROOFTOP UNIT, REPAIR $349.12 WATER HEATER SWITCH, REPLACE THERMOSTAT NORTH ENTRY HEATER, REPLACE DPST RELAY WEST ENTRY HTR Invoice 26999 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance REPAIR MOTOR ROOFTOP UNIT, REPAIR $3,142.03 WATER HEATER SWITCH, REPLACE THERMOSTAT NORTH ENTRY HEATER, REPLACE DPST RELAY WEST ENTRY HTR Invoice 26999 5/1412014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 51 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 28 FIRE DEPT SHIELD BADGES Invoice 205216 5/13/2014 PO 24400 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 52 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -210 Operating Supplies TWINE GREEN 9000- HWS Invoice 21 -19980 4/2/2014 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Refer 36 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9724998484 5/1012014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,491.15 $1,718.00 Total $1,718,00 $41.75 Total $41,75 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 5 -11 -14 THRU 6 -10 -2014 Invoice 9724998484 5/10/2014 Transaction Date 5120/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 58 VESSCO, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic WELL HOUSE CHLORINE SYSTEM WORK 5- 14-14 Invoice 60250 511512014 Transaction Date 5/21/2014 Refer 35 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 519892093 515/2014 Transaction Date 512012014 Refer 40 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $46.68 $46.68 $46.68 $140.04 $280.08 $105.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.00 5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS -4 -3 TO 5 -2 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 DEPOT BLDG -1021- $5,053.03 $5,053.03 $102.45 $51.16 CITY OF MOUND 05/22/14 1:51 PM -- �'-� Page 10 Payments CITY OF NIOUN Current Period: May 2014 Fund Summary Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4127/14 $3,792.34 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $39,170.37 222 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $1,677.03 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $6,518.50 285 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $2,500.56 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $329.03 475 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4127/14 $1,475.52 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 $14,820.10 602 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $1,360.58 Invoice 412322323 5/1312014 $2,479.67 675 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4127/14 $1,360.58 Invoice 412322323 5/1312014 $96,098.15 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27114 TO 4/27/14 $852.32 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 285 -46388 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27/14 $1,798.45 Invoice 412322323 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 3/27/14 TO 4/27114 $43.46 Invoice 412322323 5/1312014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,014.45 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERALFUND $39,170.37 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $18,198.17 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $6,518.50 285 MOUND HRA $1,798.45 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $329.03 475 TIF 1 -3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $2,264.75 601 WATER FUND $14,820.10 602 SEWER FUND $10,260.70 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $2,479.67 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $258.41 $96,098.15 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $96,098.15 Total $96,098.15 -1022- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410: 43 AM - _- Page 1 Payments CITY OF NWUND Current Period: May 2014 Batch Name 052714HWS User Dollar Amt $79,329.84 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $79,329.84 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $229.50 Invoice 437412904 519/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 437412904 5/9/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.50 Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES $62.40 Invoice 90173300 5114/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $66.50 Invoice 90173300 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $82.99 Invoice 90194800 5119/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $89.85 Invoice 43027300 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,503.70 Invoice 43027300 5/1412014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,733.44 Invoice 43090400 5/19/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $68.20 Invoice 43027300 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,607.08 Refer 3 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN V Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $72.70 Invoice 132377 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $710.05 Invoice 132378 5/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $185.60 Invoice 135787 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale BEER $775.22 Invoice 135788 5121/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,743.57 Refer 4 BLUSKYPUBLISHING _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising 1/4 PAGE AD MAY 14 WEST LAKE BUSINESS $140.00 PUBLICATION Invoice 15971 5/1/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $140.00 Refer 5 COCA COLA BOTTLING- MIDWEST _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $217.92 Invoice 0168052709 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $217.92 Refer 6_DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $425.00 Invoice 68298 5/19/2014 -1023- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410:43 AM Page 2 J~ \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,572.35 Invoice 2213493 $333.76 Invoice 19993 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $548.55 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo � — - 10100 - Total -. 11 $758.76 11 -� Refer 7 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY___ - - 1 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,009.95 $82.90 Invoice 751749 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $10.75 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment $841.50 Invoice 751750 5/13/2014 Invoice 617578 5/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Total - $2116 Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR $52.60 Invoice 752803 5/20/2014 -1024- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,67105 Invoice 752804 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 752465 5/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 000358 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5120/2014 .... Wells Fargo ....., 10100 ...w- Total ....� $3,810.05 e....._ .�,_.. Refer ,. , 1111111" . _.w .. . . ..... .......... 8 EXCELSIOR BREWING COMPANY . ,..—, _ � ,. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $126.00 Invoice 3683 5/6/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo - -- 10100 Total $126.00 Refer 9 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $612.00 Invoice 166880 5115/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $9.00 Invoice 166880 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $621.00 Refer 10 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $321.25 Invoice 702154 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $321.25 Refer 11 JJ TAYLOR, DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,572.35 Invoice 2213493 511312014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $548.55 Invoice 2213532 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,889.05 Invoice 2213533 5/20/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,009.95 Refer -,. 13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $10.75 Invoice 617577 5/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - $12.41 Invoice 617578 5/2/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - $2116 Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ -- -1024- CITY OF MOUND 05/22/1410:43 AM Page 3 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX WINE $33.99 Invoice 1850100 5/14/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1161576 $1,617.34 Invoice 1850098 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,666.20 Invoice 1850099 5/14/2014 $366.00 Invoice 822193 5/9/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,317.53 Refer 15 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Invoice 822295 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE BEER $774.38 Invoice 8449330 5/19/2014 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 8449330 5119/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $57.00 Invoice 8449343 5/19/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8449343 5119/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $843.63 Refer 14 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $397.00 Invoice 8447862 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $0.00 Invoice 8447862 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $636.58 Invoice 8448197 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 8448197 5/12/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,046.08 Refer 16 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,03915 Invoice 2604340 5/1412014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,580.30 Invoice 2604339 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,619.45 Refer, 17 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $528.50 Invoice 1161575 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,020.28 Invoice 1161576 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,548.78 Refer 19 TH ORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $366.00 Invoice 822193 5/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,643.00 Invoice 822295 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $228.00 Invoice 823579 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Farnn 10100 Total $4,237.00 i MY OF MOUND WAR WEN Pill WE Payments 05122/14 10:43 AM Page 4 Refer 22 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment Current Period: May 2014 WINE Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment Refer 18 THORPE DISTRIBUTIN_G_COMPAN _ Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $181.22 Invoice 823606 5120/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $88.30 Invoice 823607 5/20/2014 E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $12,200.16 Invoice 823608 5/2012014 Invoice 361475 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/2012014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,469.68 Refer 20 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ ............... � _Refer Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $216.00 Invoice 0098137 5/8/2014 E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 503249 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0098137 51812014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $207,92 Invoice 0098138 5/812014 BEER Invoice 1090227544 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0098138 51812014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $431.42 Refer 21 USA _ _ Cash Payment _WEBLEASE E 609 -49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY WEBSITE SVC- HWS 5 -15 -14 TO 6- $99.00 14 -14 Invoice 64980 5/1512014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer 22 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 360781 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 360940 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 360940 5/8/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 361475 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 361475 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo - 23 WINEMERCHANTS-�� ............... � _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 503248 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 503249 5/14/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 24 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1090227543 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 1090227544 5/21/2014 -1026- $576.00 $8.40 $280.00 $8.25 $776.00 $11.55 10100 Total $1,660.20 $1,969.10 $23.00 10100 Total $1,992.10 $7,556.90 $246.00 CITY OF MOUND 05122/14 10:43 AM -'- Page 5 Payments M iOU �v ,.ti" r OF rat Current Period: May 2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.00 Invoice 1090227545 5/21/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$8,80 Invoice RMA006271 5/2012014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.50 Invoice 1090223902 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,309.05 Invoice 1090223901 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $27.20 Invoice RMA004672 5/13/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,140.45 Refer 25 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,411.14 Invoice 1080179327 5/1512014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,027.22 Invoice 1080179326 5/15/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$6.00 Invoice 2080042457 5/1412014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - 5105.00 Invoice 2080040791 5/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $34.24 Invoice 1080179328 5/15/2014 Transaction Date 5/20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,361.60 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $79,329.84 $79,329.84 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $79,329.84 Total $79,329.84 -1027- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 13, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, May 13, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, County Assessor Kari Kamrath, County Assessor Rob Winge, Consultant Rita Trapp, Seth Anderson, Rachel Christensen, Lily Hames, Stephani Boyum, Paul Boyum, Cliff Simon, Curt Nelson, Jim Reuper, Josh Leddy, Jessica Rashleger, Kent Friedrichsen, Matthew Van Nelson, Jordan Korczak, Jeff Lundgren Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2. Pledae of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Mayor Mark Hanus with "Mayor for the Day" Proclamations MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following proclamations. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Proclamation naming Rachel Christensen as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of Mound, Minnesota. B. Proclamation naming Seth Anderson as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in the City of Mound, Minnesota. C. Proclamation naming Lily Hames as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of Mound, Minnesota. 5. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $271,194.76. B. Approve minutes of the April 22, 2014 regular meeting. I MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES May 13, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, May 13, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, County Assessor Kari Kamrath, County Assessor Rob Winge, Consultant Rita Trapp, Seth Anderson, Rachel Christensen, Lily Hames, Stephani Boyum, Paul Boyum, Cliff Simon, Curt Nelson, Jim Reuper, Josh Leddy, Jessica Rashleger, Kent Friedrichsen, Matthew Van Nelson, Jordan Korczak, Jeff Lundgren Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. 2. Pledae of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Mayor Mark Hanus with "Mayor for the Day" Proclamations MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the following proclamations. All voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Proclamation naming Rachel Christensen as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of Mound, Minnesota. B. Proclamation naming Seth Anderson as "Deputy Mayor for a Day" in the City of Mound, Minnesota. C. Proclamation naming Lily Hames as "Deputy Mayor for a Day' in the City of Mound, Minnesota. 5. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $271,194.76. B. Approve minutes of the April 22, 2014 regular meeting. I Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 C. Approve Fire Inspection Permit for Our Lady of the Lake Catholic Church — "The Blast" on Saturday, May 17, 2014 with fees paid. D. Approve permit for Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for the Northwest Tonka Lions — WeCAN Fundraising Event on May 16, 2014 with fee paid. E. RESOLUTION NO.14 -33: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 1728 FINCH LANE, PID #13- 117 -24 -13 -0018. ORDINANCE NO. 05 -2014: ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCHISE FEES. G. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -34: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY. H. Cancel Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving a concept plan for assisted living facility by Trident Development scheduled for May 20, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. Set a Special Meeting Workshop for the purpose of receiving Developer Day Summary for June 17, 2014 at 6:30 p.m. 6. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None were offered. 7. Kari Kamrath and Robert Winge, County Assessors, with 2014 Hennepin County Assessment and Board of Appeal and Equalization Report from May 7, 2014. Kari Kamrath, Senior Appraiser for Mound stated the 2014 open book meeting was held on May 7" and 6 residents attended. Kamrath stated property sales for the period October 2012 through September 2013 were analyzed to come up with the payable 2015 values. Kamrath relayed the following increases by property type: residential 15.8% on average, with some neighborhoods as high as 20 — 30 %, residential lakeshore 5.3 %, commercial and industrial 0.7 %, apartments 3 %, condominiums 17.9 %, townhomes 9.9 %, duplexes 16.9°/x, and zero lot lines 10 %. The overall gross value increase was 10.7 %. To date, the assessor's office has received 62 value notice calls and has completed 11 appointments. Kamrath stated if the property tax increased more than 12% and $100, it may qualify for a special property tax refund up to $1,000. The general property tax refund is income based. Both forms can be found on the Minnesota Department of Revenue website and should be included in the income tax filing for 2015. 8. Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain for the Lake Minnetonka Association, requesting contributions for the treatment of Phelps Bay. Josh Leddy, project manager for the LMA, and Jim Reuper, Phelps Bay Captain, explained that the Phelps Bay treatment area will be expanded in 2014 to east Phelps Bay and they are requesting additional funding. Mayor Hanus stated that funding requests should be received in spring for the following budget year and that the City does not have excess funds. Leddy stated the LMA is requesting an additional $3,000 for east Phelps Bay. Leddy stated that a Lake Improvement District (LID) is in the process of being created for St. Alban's Bay. A LID establishes a Board of Directors comprised of bay residents, and a majority of the bay residents could determine what level of treatment/service they want and then the -1029- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 costs would be assessed to the properties on that bay. Discussion ensued and Leddy stated he would need to obtain more information on the subject from Rob Roy who is heading up that initiative. 9. Rita Trapp, Consultant with Hoisinqton- Koegler, Inc., requesting discussion on Rita Trapp stated the applicant has requested City Council review the sketch plan and that it is not required. This review does not require a public hearing, but Trapp noted neighbors are present in the audience and written comments received from them have been included for Council consideration. Trapp summarized the proposed subdivision and stated all lots meet the zoning requirements for R2, which is a minimum of 6,000 square feet. Trapp stated the Planning Commission did not identify any concerns in their review. Mayor asked if cul -de -sac is standard size and Trapp stated that the engineer and fire chief felt it was sufficient but that she will need to look at the code. Salazar asked whether or not the detached deck is on an unimproved road. Trapp said there is a 2 foot setback required for a detached deck from the side. Trapp said Staff needs to research if a permit was pulled at the time of deck construction. Trapp said vacating a right of way is somewhat problematic. Kent Friedrichsen, 5913 Fairfield Road, stated he is the applicant, resident, and a real estate broker. Friedrichsen responded to some of the concerns raised by the council and neighbors. Hanus stated he would make some preliminary general comments. First, he feels the Lot 3 explanation seemed to make sense and second, he does not have any serious issues with the concept being proposed. Salazar stated he did a site visit and found it odd new homes would be built behind existing homes. Hanus stated similar cul -de -sacs exist all over city. Friedrichsen stated that the new owner of 5921 Fairfield Road /Lot 4 was a first time homeowner and that Friedrichsen purposely moved the structure on lot 5 as far back as possible to minimize impacts. Friedrichsen went on to address other concerns noted by neighbors. Gillispie asked what the proposed timeline was for completing all of the structures. Friedrichsen stated all would be completed as soon as possible. Friedrichsen commented on the sizes of the proposed houses and lot sizes and stated both are similar to houses and lots in the area. Friedrichsen stated the trees taken out were dead and that all utilities will be underground. Hanson stated it is a benefit that the structures will be further back on the lot to allow for parking since there is no street parking. The street extension will be 24 feet wide which is the same as the existing width of Fairfield Road. Friedrichsen stated that he may move into one of the new houses and that he has lived in Mound for 18 years. The Mayor invited people in the audience forward if they would like to speak. Jordan Korczak, 5921 Fairfield Road /Lot 4, stated that he did have a realtor when he purchased the home and that this proposal was not known to him at the time of purchase. Hanus stated that everybody's property rights have to be considered. Matt Van Nelson, 2925 Meadow Lane, stated he owns the new house. Nelson stated he wanted to voice a concern about disruptions to the nice quiet community with three houses being built at once and that the applicant may not be fairly addressing the comments from -1030- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 neighbors. Nelson stated construction and traffic is a concern and will reduce the safety and privacy aspects that are currently enjoyed. Hanus stated that often comments received are not relevant to discussion and that it is rare that proposed changes are well received by area residents. Jeff Lundgren, 5924 Idlewood, is behind Lot 5, and is not happy to lose privacy in the rear of his lot. Friedrichsen stated that he has worked with planners with the goal of getting final plat approval at the same time as the preliminary plat to save money and be proactive. Friedrichsen stated the state requirement is 45 feet for the cul -de -sac. Smith stated she looked it up and that the Mound code is 50 feet. Hanus stated that since there is no parking on the street, he would be concerned that there would be adequate parking on the property. Smith stated that this is being treated as a three -lot major subdivision. Smith stated usually 3 lots is a minor subdivision but this is a major subdivision because of the public utility work involved. According to code, a major subdivision requires approval of a preliminary and final plat. A Public Hearing will be held for the approval of the preliminary plat at the Planning Commission and City Council levels including the required notifications. The final plat approval is just at the Council level. Smith said a development agreement will be executed with the plans and specs subject to review by the City Engineer, Public Works, Fire Department, and the City Planner. Smith stated a letter of credit will be required for the public improvements. Friedrichsen stated that funding is not a concern. 10. Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk[Treasurer, requesting discussion /action Pausche summarized the information contained in the public packet and stated that the applications and Orono police department background reports had been provided separately to the Council as decision makers. Pausche stated the State relies on the local authority to do the background check and to determine if issuing the liquor license is in the public interest. Pausche stated the Conditional Use Permit for the premises was included in the packet and that is where conditions are typically contained. Mayor Hanus asked if additional conditions may be proposed. Manderschied stated that the Council can impose additional conditions. Hanus cautioned the Council when discussing the information in background information. Manderschied stated two laws apply, the data privacy act and open meeting law that does allow for discussing private data so long as it is relevant to the decision. Gesch asked if the CUP conditions have been met. Smith stated those items will be required before the resolution is released for recording and that progress is being made. Salazar asked the applicant how start-up costs would be covered. Hanus stated he, too, wondered about finances and then he came to the conclusion that he did not feel it was his place to require proof. Paul Boyum, applicant, stated he has made arrangements with the food vendors and the bank to cover start-up expenses. Salazar asked about hiring staff and Boyum stated some are in place. Salazar asked where the applicants are living Boyum stated Golden Valley. -1031- Mound City Council Minutes —May 13, 2014 Hanus proposed the following language be added as a clarification: 'This license will be subject to revocation or non - renewal if the City Council determines that this liquor establishment is a nuisance or requires an abnormal or undue burden on law enforcement or the community." Hanus said that although there are no automatic disqualifiers triggered per the Police Chief, he feels this additional language is still needed. Hanus asked how conditions on approval are incorporated into the license. Hanus relayed a potential scenario where this additional language might be needed. Manderschied stated that City Code Section 6.53 provides a specific process for suspension or revocation of a license and that she has concerns about the use of "abnormal' and "undue burden" in the proposed language because it can be tricky to prosecute, whereas public nuisance is defined. Gesch worried that the proposed language is not measurable. Hanus asked what in addition to State Statute could be used as an enforcement tool. Manderschied referred to the Public Nuisance Ordinance and also referred to State Statute regarding over serving or providing service to minors. Hanus asked to address the undue burden on law enforcement if that were to occur. Gillispie asked about the license renewal language and if that would address it. Manderschied stated State Statute and City Code states that the licensee is responsible for the conduct on the premises, specifically Section 6.52. Manderschied said she is not concerned about placing a condition, just the language that was proposed. Hanson stated that police reports and calls for service are considered during the renewal. Manderschied stated the City Council has broad discretion at issuance and during renewal and stated that a liquor license is a privilege and not a right. Manderschied stated that courts are likely to uphold any reasonable and non - arbitrary reason. Hanus asked Manderschied to confirm that the public nuisance laws are applicable. Manderschied stated that they are applicable if the activity was related to liquor and occurred on the premises. Hanus stated that although he is not sure what the exact plans are, it appears the applicant plans to try new things and he likes that. Wegscheid stated that he drove by and did a walk through and that Mr. Boyum has done a fabulous job with the building. Wegscheid stated he is comfortable with the codes in place and supports approval of the license. Salazar stated he has given this a lot of thought and has many questions. Salazar stated a liquor license is a great privilege, and even though he is pro business, he is concerned about public safety and welfare. Even though he has trepidations, he is feeling better after hearing the other Council Members. Salazar stated that he believes there is demand for this service and if it is properly maintained and delivered, it will be successful. Hanus stated that he recently asked the Orono School Resource Officer about police calls /activity at The Narrows in Navarre and he was surprised to hear that there was very little. Salazar asked about DUls and Hanus stated that this type of business comes with inherent risks and that he hopes that they control it well and avoid the need for a police presence. Discussion ensued about server training and Pausche stated that it is in the business plan and is typically required by the liquor liability insurance carrier. Hanson stated that the required 50/50 ratio for food and liquor receipts will help keep the balance. -1032- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve an intoxicating on -sale liquor license and a Sunday liquor license for Stephani Boyum and Paul Boyum for Cattails Kitchen N Cocktails. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 11. Pausche stated that there was gambling, including pull tabs and paddle wheel, at the former VFW and that the State of Minnesota requires a resolution by the Council to approve the permit. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Gillispie, to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -35: RESOLUTION APPROVING PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING AT CATTAILS KITCHEN N COCKTAILS, LLC. Mound. Hanson stated issues arose last summer and that the Orono Police Department has asked for more enforceable language in the City Code. Hanson stated this proposed language is to address conducting of business on public lands, including up to 600 feet into the water, and also prohibits businesses from citing the address of City property as the business address in advertising. Hanson stated the intent is to keep these places primarily for the public enjoyment, although Staff will be working on language that allows the permitting of certain types of businesses that are deemed to be in the public interest. Gillispie asked how the farmers markets would be impacted and Hanson stated that the one that takes place on public land is permitted. Discussion ensued about how Staff will know when business is being conducted on public land and Hanson stated the City received many reports from the public last year as well as the police officers know to look for it. At 9:00 pm, the meeting was recessed to change the recording medium. The meeting was resumed at 9:05 pm. Wegscheid asked Hanson to describe the types of calls that were received and Hanson gave examples. Salazar said the Council needs to consider the liability issues on city property. Hanson stated that insurance is required as part of any permitting process. Gillispie asked about any signage issues and Hanson stated that it is primarily when they use their vehicles as advertising bulletin boards. Wegscheid asked what the repercussion is for violating the ordinance and Manderschied stated violators could be charged with a misdemeanor. The City, as owner, can authorize use through permits and /or rental agreements. Hanson gave the example of Tommy's Trolly in Excelsior. Discussion ensued about the use of "immediately' in the resolution with regards to the delivery of goods, products, and services and Manderschied stated she used it in order to address vendors who may be there with the City's authorization. Hanus stated when the Bay Rentals' CUP was approved last year the Council was specific that the rental needed to take place on their private property and that he would use public property only to launch the watercraft. -1033- Mound City Council Minutes — May 13, 2014 Salazar asked what would prevent someone from conducting a business out of their garage and Hanus stated that is allowed subject to the exterior storage unit, signs, and other language in the code that would apply. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to adopt the following ordinance, as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 06- 2014 -: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 50 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO PARKS AND RECREATION PROHIBITING PRIVATE BUSINESS ON PUBLIC LANDS OR WATERS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF MOUND. 13. At 9:25 p.m. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council would go into closed session for the purpose of performing the City Manager's performance evaluation. City Manager Hanson stated she wished to conduct her performance evaluation in a closed session. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to close the session for the purpose of conducting the City Manager performance review. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Hanus read the applicable State Statute language that allows the Council to close the meeting. Mayor Hanus reconvened the meeting at 11:28 pm. Mayor Hanus announced that the Council had completed the performance evaluation of the City Manager. 14. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager: Gesch thanked the owners of Carbone's for following through on their promise to provide alternative transportation for their patrons. Hanson announced that on Saturday, May 17, the Farmer's Market will open, and the Meals for Wheels and Our Lady of the Lake Blast fundraisers will take place. B. Minutes: Planning Commission — March 4, 2014 C. Reports: Mound Fire Department Fire Commission Meeting Agenda — May 7, 2014 Strathmore's Who's Who Honors Kandis Hanson D. Correspondence: Letter from Hennepin County on Community Development Block Grant program —April 18, 2014 Email from Chief Farniok on Successful Explorers Competition — May 1, 2014 Letter from Westonka Historical Society requesting volunteers Letter from Mediacom on channel lineup — May 1, 2104 Minnetrista /Mound Clean Up Day — May 10, 2014 Hennepin County Hazardous Waste Collection Events 15. Adiourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn at 11:30 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1034- JATLIllid- MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. 10() '— u �r t PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY TO $600/DAY* 100— i 1 L�Q 1 [fib h ti j i CU DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Usei;U Used I tj 01jleir PI&(a Intended Use `Tb 0 it Je TO Y1 �GG( zg .7 -,;hp Expected Attendance com01Wt( Representative's Name j T w LI i-6)n Ceti. Telephone No. Beyttme: (& l7, qto - j2A(y Work: lG 52) 40J -5-D4 j E- Mail: . ([ f{ M e) M iV)tle4Nl Drivers License Number: ' �Lyt GLI- �- ��ii267 -S» e artmental Approval pt'-`erk Police Dept. 4,3D Speaa1 Gen+ `{/ryn w Cheer i 5+ Date of Single Dance License Year Annual Dance LICENSE # CITY OF MOUND 2415 WILSHIRE BLVD. MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC DANCE/LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION EVENT: LOCATION OF DANCEILIVE MUSIC: W D iyy r- F f W TYPE OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: L f TIME PERIOD OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC _,5a+yr -Aa y 7/7--((� , 1 .00 a•M �V h cwj (HOURS PERMITTED: Mon -Sat: 8pm- 12:30am- Sunday: pm- 11:30pm) CHAIRPERSON OR ,L APPLICANT: -1 i IM LI f n TITLE: eCeGuiIVP D(f o L M Il'4t"W611" ADDRESS: Hc5Tq V1(v� Aj(1 120" ADDRESS: �r�Cisl�� Wlr� 33� E -MAIL 1 (t'M . i i t& (V) M QU1 e h)1(io( , WL. Vnn.0 5 HOME PHONE #: / o _g, HOME PHONE #: 14 WORK PHONE #: NG7-) �AO I - �N3 WORK PHONE #: loll Date Applicant's Signature 1036- Department Approval/Denial (Submit memo if denied) Approved Denied Police Dept. Adm. Fire Dept. CITY OF MOUND��, 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300 /DAY TO $600/DAY* (l . (J DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* F *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Use e � - 1 Area to be Used C- ('J-t 1 { r Time Frame "ZOISM, Intended Use We I'a A Expected Attendance SC Organization Represei Address Telephone No. Home: ex- Work: lj G O yj— /,55q / Drivers License Number l / �GC�I �/ a ��1� �(X J 1 t 77 De artmental Approval 1tv Clerk 5q.1 Police Dept. -1037- Afinnescia �3.VTi6'ENf Ci NSTA7�1nE5WFtE5 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Region 3 Fisheries 1200 Warner Road, St Paul MN 55106 Phone: 651- 259 -5831 /Fax: 651- 772 -7974 PERMIT TO CONDUCT FISHING TOURNAMENT Permission is hereby granted to the individual and /or organization named below to conduct a fishing tournament under the provisions of this permit, pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes and Rules. Name of Tournament: Permit Number: Fishers of Men Minnesota Team Division 14- 314 -T24 Name of Permittee: Telephone Number (Include Area Code): Dave & Tammy Shade 612- 280 -1559 Address (No. & Street, RFD, Box No., City, State, Zip Code): Hennepin 130 Shasta Circle West Chanhassen, MN 55317 Public Access to be used (See #5 on reverse side.): Name of Sponsor (Organization, Firm or Individual): Public Access Fishers of Men National Tournament Trail Name of Waters: Acres: County: Division of Waters I.D. Number: Minnetonka 14,729 Hennepin 27 -0133 Public Access to be used (See #5 on reverse side.): Public Access Tournament Species: Largemouth & Smallmouth Bass Weigh -in Stations: Catch and Release Tournament: X Yes / _ No Centerview Park, Mound Estimated No. of Entrants: Boats: Beginning Date: Term Hating Date: 100 50 August 23, 2014 August 23, 2014 Daily Fishing Hours Entry Fee per Individual Estimated Total Prize Value 7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. $150 $4,500 Additional Stipulations /Conditions: See Reverse Side. *The permittee shall submit a report on forms provided, to the Regional Fisheries Manager identified below, within 30 days after completion of the contest. Regional Ofce -Copy Distribution: • St. Paul Fisheries Office • Regional Fisheries Manager • Area Fisheries Supervisor • Area Trails & Waterways Supervisor I Area Conservation Officer Regional Fisheries Man.- er' Si nature Date DNR Region 3 Fisheries Manager 1200 Warner Road St Paul Mn 55106 -6793 ®. /pat'' Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " 7 k 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 ft Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 `�_� "'� www,bolton- menk.com May 20, 2014 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Emergency Retaining Wall Replacement 5097 Three Points Boulevard Request Payment of Invoice Dear Ms. Hanson: Attached is the Invoice from Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. for the full replacement of the existing two - tiered limestone block wall that failed on or about April 281i. Quotes from four contractors were received on May 2 1d with the low quote being submitted by Advanced Wall Structures, Inc., Prior Lake, in the amount of $37,514.00. The new wall is a two- tiered modular block wall conforming to the City's standard type and color. The invoiced amount is based on the actual amount of modular block installed. In addition, the split rail fence, bid at $1,064.00 was not installed as part of this work. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $33,210.00 to Advanced Wall Structures, Inc. Sincerely, BOLTON & /M�� EDDNK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. Mound City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance -1039- 5650 Starview Lane Prior Lake, MN 55372 952 - 447 -7300 Cell 612-387-4767 Invoice Submitted To: City of Mound / Bolton -Menk 05/15/14 ATTN: Dan Faulkmer, P. E. danfa@bolton- menk.com Job Name: 5097 Three Points Job Location: Mound, MN RETAINING WALL 5097 Three Points: 1,176 SF Anchor Block Wall installed @ $17.50 PSF $26,460.00 Removal of old wall $ 6,750.00 No fence required $ .00 THANK YOU! TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $33,210.00 -1040- Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: May 20, 2014 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -04 Front Yard Setback Variance Request REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant has requested a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lare in the Mound Terrace Addition just south of Dutch Lake. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two-story home with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage. With frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane be designated as the front. Staff is supportive of the designation of Birch Lane as the front of the lot. The designation will be similar to the other homes along Birch Lane further to the east. In addition, while Dutch Lane is the portion of the lot with the smallest frontage, the intersection of the three roadways in that location significantly limits the buildable area on that side of the lot and would make movement in and out of the lot challenging and potentialy unsafe. Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street provide a front yard setback on each street. This provision imposes a 30 foot setback on the property on three sides. It is for this reason that the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the setback requirement on one of the sides down to 20.5 feet. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May6, 2014 meeting and recommended on a 5 -1 -1 vote for approval. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. 12 -1041 -Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 6260 BIRCH LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -04 PID NO. 14- 117 -24 -32 -0040 WHEREAS, the applicant, Loren Pellett, has submitted a request for a variance to allow a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, has an irregular shape and street frontage on three sides; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1 single- family residential. Section 129 -100 of the City Code contains the regulations for the R -1 district; and WHEREAS, Sec. 129 -100 (b) (2) (c) requires a minimum front setback of 30 feet; and WHEREAS, the property is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lane in the Mound Terrace Addition. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two -story home with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage; and WHEREAS, with frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane be designated as the front. According to Section 129 -2 of the City Code, the following is the definition of the front lot line: Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street. In the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or as otherwise designated by the Community Development Director based on the practical front yard of the property as determined by such factors as the existing or proposed building configuration of the property and taking into consideration the characteristics of the surrounding properties. If the dimensions of a corner lot are equal, the front line shall be designated by the owner and filed with the city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot shall have only one front setback. ; and WHEREAS, Section 129 -197 (e) of the Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street shall provide the required front yards along every street; and 1042- WHEREAS, the following includes the proposed dimensions for the subject lot: ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: Variance 9.5 feet (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; -1043- Required Proposed Lot Area 10, 000 sq. ft. 13,148 sq, ft. Lot Width 60 feet 180 feet Front Yard (Birch Lane) 30 feet 20.5 feet Rear Yard (Red Oak Road) 30 feet 30 feet Side Yard (Dutch Lane) 30 feet 85+ feet Side Yard (east) 10 feet 10 feet Hardcover (maximum 4091o) 5,259 sq. ft. 2,724 sq. ft. ; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: Variance 9.5 feet (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; -1043- (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its May 6, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, a majority of the Planning Commission voted to recommend Council approval of the variance, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its May 27, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The property's irregular shape and frontage on three streets pose practical difficulties as 30 foot setbacks are required for each frontage located along a street. 3. The proposed front yard setback is still more than 20 feet and maintains a similar setback as adjacent properties. 4. The reduction in the proposed front yard setback reduces the amount of hardcover required for the site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: 1. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning District. 2. All structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor is at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. -1044- 3. Building height of the new structure shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining sedimentation and erosion control on the site during construction and until such time as ground cover is fully established. Applicant will be responsible for all required permitting from the MCWD for the project, including but not limited to, procurement of an erosion control permit, as well as the City's standard conditions that are required for new construction projects. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 6. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 8. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 10. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 11. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 12. Payment of all involved fees that are required with the building permit for new home construction on a vacant lot, including but not limited to, Trunk Water Area Charge, Trunk Sewer Area Charge, Water Connection Fee, Sewer Connection Fee and MCES SAC fee. Fees to be collected shall be the amounts in effect at the time the building permit is issued. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: Lot 8, Block 7, "MOUND TERRACE" according to the record plat thereof Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014. Mark Hanus, Mayor -1045- MINUTE EXCERPTS MAY 6, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -04 Variance 6260 Birch Lane Applicant: Loren Pellett Trapp introduced the front setback variance request. The lot is irregular in shape and currently vacant. A 2000 SF house is proposed and shown on the survey. Birch Lane is designated as front by request of the owner. Staff supports Birch' Lane as front because of safety issues on Dutch Lane and the character of the neighborhood. A front setback requirement of 30 feet is difficult so a 20.5 setback is being requested. The required 30 foot setback on the three frontages along streets is greater than similar properties in the area, limits backyard use and increases hardcover due to the longer driveway. The survey shows a deck but building plans do not. Staff is recommending approval with standard requirements and findings of fact. Retterath noted that the dimension off Birch Lane seems to be measured differently. Hennepin County shows a difference in the location of the front lot lines. Loren Pellet — 5660 Sunnybrook Cir —After the property was staked to the original drawing and you walked the property and saw how long the driveway and compared it to the currently proposed setback it's obvious how much better it was. it flows with the neighborhood much better and improves the hardcover. Discussion Retterath walked site; it's very open to west. He's struggling with the rationale of the difficulty of putting a house on this parcel. it would technically put this house closer to the curb than the adjacent house. He doesn't see a practical difficulty and will not support it. The deck could be put in a different place. Retterath stated that the applicant actually demonstrated that a house could be built on this property. The 30 foot setback it is buildable. It's not a practical difficulty. Trapp said that Staff felt 30' on 3 sides was excessive and more than what most properties have to deal with. Smieja asked why 30 feet for corner lot. Trapp said R1 front setback is 30 feet. This one is unusual because it's triangular with 3 fronts. Retterath still comes back to the city granting a practical difficulty case because the owner wants it a certain way. Trapp noted that the standard is practical difficulty. which means something reasonable cannot be done within the standard. Pellett disagrees that there is no difficulty. There's extreme difficulty. The area is mostly 20 -25 foot setbacks. The backyard is really close to street and quality of the project for the neighborhood is impacted. Smieja confirmed that if this was zoned R2 this wouldn't be a problem. Trapp agreed but noted the surrounding properties are R1A not R2. The R1A areas to the north have 20 foot fronts as well as much of the R1 homes to the east. Wegscheid supports the variance. Practical difficulty isn't a defined mathematical equation. It differs from person to person. MOTION by Wegscheid, second by Stone, to accept staff recommendation. MOTION carried. Voting for: Stone, Gawtry, Goode, Penner, and Wegscheid. Voting against: Retterath. Smieja abstained. -1047- nAAL y T • r TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director April 30, 2014 14 -04 Front Yard Setback Variance Loren Pellett on behalf of property owner Novak Fleck Inc. 6260 Birch Lane (PID NO. 14- 117 -24 -32 -0040) Low Density Residential R -1 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant has requested a 9.5 foot front yard setback variance to facilitate the construction of a new home with attached garage. The property, which is currently vacant, has an irregular shape and street frontage on three sides. SITE INFORMATION The property is located at the intersection of Birch Lane, Red Oak Road, and Dutch Lane in the Mound Terrace Addition. The property is located just south of Dutch Lake and will have views of the lake. The applicant is proposing an approximately 2,000 square foot, two -story home with three bedrooms and two bathrooms and an attached three car garage. With frontage on three streets, the applicant has requested that the frontage along Birch Lane be designated as the front. According to Section 129 -2 of the City Code, the following is the definition of the front lot line: Lot line, front, means that boundary of a lot which abuts an existing or dedicated public street. In the case of a corner lot it shall be the shortest dimension on a public street or as otherwise designated by the Community Development Director based on the practical front yard of the property as determined by such factors as the existing or proposed building configuration of the property and taking into consideration the characteristics of the surrounding properties. If the dimensions of a corner lot are equal, the front line 1M. 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report shall be designated by the owner and filed with the city. For purpose of this chapter, a lot shall have only one front setback. Staff is supportive of the designation of Birch Lane as the front of the lot. The designation will be similar to the other homes along Birch Lane further to the east. In addition, while Dutch Lane is the portion of the lot with the smallest frontage, the intersection of the three roadways in that location significantly limits the buildable area on that side of the lot and would make movement in and out of the lot challenging and potentially unsafe. Section 129 -197 (e) of the Mound City Code requires that lots which abut more than one street shall provide the required front yards along every street. The City Code has a provision which allows a reduction to setback requirements, based on lot width, for lots of record. However, given that this lot is more than 81 feet wide, the required lot setback along each street is still 30 feet. The following are the proposed dimensions for the application: 4 9 01 44 II&ME iGPf J REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. -1049 - May 1, 2014 Page 2 Required Proposed /Existing Variance Lot Area 10,000 sq. ft. 13,148 sq. ft. Lot Width 60 feet 180 feet Front Yard (Birch Lane) 30 feet 20.5 feet 9.5 feet Rear Yard (Red Oak Road) 30 feet 30 feet - Side Yard (Dutch Lane) 30 feet 85+ feet - Side Yard (east) 10 feet 10 feet - Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 5,259 sq. ft. 2,724 sq. ft. - REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. -1049 - May 1, 2014 Page 2 6260 Birch lane Variance PC Report (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on April 1, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be April 2, 2014. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Melissa Manderschied, I do not have any concerns with this application as it is a uniquely City Attorney shaped parcel. Staff to confirm with applicant that the application was signed by authorized signatory. Confirm assignment of 6260 Birch for subject property. Dan Faulkner, City If approved, significant erosion control measures should be Engineer required during home construction. Tom Dietrich Based on these preliminary plans, the property owner would be required to apply for an erosion control permit with the District. All information relevant to the permit application can be found online but if the applicant needs any help, please refer them to me. -1050 - May 1, 2014 Page 3 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report Correy Farniok, Orono No issues. Police Chief Scott Qualle, Building I have no comments. Official DISCUSSION • The applicant has provided an alternative survey that shows the placement of the home if all setbacks are met. As shown, this placement will limit the rear yard area and require a longer driveway. • As noted in the narrative, the angle of the street means that while the corner of the house is setback 20.5 from the closest point, the distance from the garage straight south to the street will be 26.5 feet. • Planning Commissioners are advised that the applicant narrative contains some errors in describing setback requirements for adjacent properties. The properties located to the north across Red Oak Lane, adjacent to Dutch Lake, have 20 foot front yard setbacks because they are zoned R -1A not because they are Lakeshore lots. The applicant also states that lots of records in the R -1 District are allowed a 20 foot setback. Section 129 -100 (3) does allow a front yard setback reduction for lots of record. The reduction is based on a lot's depth. Those that have a lot depth of less than 60 feet can be reduced to 20 feet, while those lots between 61 and 80 feet deep are allowed to be reduced to 24 feet. Properties with a lot depth of more than 81 feet must maintain the required 30 foot setback. Staff's determination is that this lot's depth is more than 81 feet and so 30 foot setbacks are required. • The applicant has proposed hardcover totaling 2,724 square feet, which is 22 %. This is well below the lot of record requirement of 40 %. • The survey shows a future conforming deck on the north elevation abutting Red Oak Road. It was not shown on the building plans however. • Section 113 -53 (b) (4) states that all structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor elevation, including basement or crawl space, is at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The RFPE for Dutch Lake is 942.0 feet. The lowest floor elevation shown for the proposed new house is shown at 968.9 feet. • According to the applicant, the proposed height of the home is just over 30 feet, which would meet the R -1 Zoning District maximum of 35 feet. Staff is verifying the calculations provided and will ensure the height meets zoning code requirements during the building permit process. • Per code, minimum allowed driveway width is 10 feet; maximum is 24 feet. Side setbacks of 1 feet are required. Driveways are required to be hard surfaced. -1051 - May 1, 2014 Page 4 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report STAFF RECOMMENDATION In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a 9.5 foot front yard variance as requested by the applicant subject tc the following conditions: 1. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning District, 2. All structures shall be constructed so that the lowest floor is at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. 3. Building height of the new structure shall be less than 35 feet as required by City Code. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining sedimentation and erosion control on the site during construction and until such time as ground cover is fully established. Applicant will be responsible all required permitting from MCWD for the project, including but not limited to, procurement of an erosion control permit, as well as the City's standard conditions that are required for new construction projects. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 6. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. 7. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 8. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 10. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 11. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. -1052- May 1, 2014 Page 5 6260 Birch Lane Variance PC Report 12, Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain and erosion control are in effect; also others. Applicant is advised that these rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as rules regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by th e Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. The applicant is requested to contact the MCWD regarding the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Any future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance (as applicable) and /or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. 13. Payment of all involved fees that are required with the building permit for new home construction on a vacant lot including but not limited to Trunk Water Area Charge, Trunk Water Area Charge, Water Connection Fee, Sewer Connection Fee and MCES SAC fee. Fees to be collected shall be the amounts in effect at the time the building permit is issued. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The property's irregular shape and frontage on three streets pose practical difficulties as 30 foot setbacks are required for each frontage located along a street. 3. The proposed front yard setback is still more than 20 feet and maintains a similar setback as adjacent properties. 4. The reduction in the proposed front yard setback reduces the amount of hardcover required for the site. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the variance request will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014. 1053- May 1, 2014 Page 6 Planning Commission Date &t ?Y 6A ) 1V / Case No. -6L City Council Date f � 2A ae,7 91ST-Tlh -yo - 3o]Jwiiff ru•tU OTHER THAN OWNER) 1. Has an 'OZO 4 Name'4�reA Rojle -7L�- Email tn/ PhoneHome9S ` Y262 Work Q 5c!%L2/162 Fax a�2 - -�' ever been made for zoning, use permit, or for this property? Yes ( ) Noy). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance information (10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 -1054- j J Y Case N ®. 3. Do the existing structures comply wi h all a, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): 1 ? SETBACKS: i. q t' I'll C'F"r,/� REQUIRED REQUESTED (or existing) Front Yard: ( N (VE W ft. Side Yard: (N 4 W) f C-D ft. 10 ft. Side Yard: (N S E 3(2 ft. ft. Rear Yard: & E W) ft. ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. Street Frontage: �� ft. ft. VARIANCE ft ft ft 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? N too narrow ( ) too small f4 too shallow ( ) topography ( ) drainage (shape ( ) soil ( ) existing situation () other: specify Please describe: SAS FJ✓ Ty f/ci �` Variance Information (10/2112013) Page 5 of 6 -1055- SAS FJ✓ Ty f/ci �` Variance Information (10/2112013) Page 5 of 6 -1055- Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), NoA, ff yea, Wien: 7, Was the practical difficulty created by any other human-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes( ), No X), if yes, explain: f3. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in - this patttion? .Yes W), No( ). if no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? s. l certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be - submitted herewith are true and accurate, l acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premixes described in this application by any authorized Official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintainfag and removing such notices as-may be required by law. _ riOwner's Slonatur® A,apticert's ftnafur(&6 Vadanoe fntoenawn f 10,7111018) Page 6 of 6 -1056- Loren Pellett 5660 Sunnybrook Circle Mound, MN, 55364 03/31/2014 City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN, 55364 Dear Planning Commission and City Council. The reason for my variance is to build a quality house that fits into the neighborhood well. The house was staked and after being staked I noticed it is not in the optimal location. The house being moved forward would flow considerable better with the neighbors properties than it does under the setback regulations in the zoning district. Also moving forward would reduce approximately 300' of hardcover. The hardship for the lot is the shape of the lot. Birch lane comes at angle to the property. Using a 30' front yard setback puts the house at 37' from the road on left corner straight to the road and 58' from the road on right side of the house causing a longer driveway and using lots of hard cover on a small lot. Pulling the house forward to 20.5 would put the house at 26.5 straight to the road on the left side of the house and 47' to the road on the right side of the house. The next door neighbor's house to the left is 21' from the road. If the house where moved to a 20' setback it would line up better with their house. Also the houses across the street are Lake Properties so their setbacks are all at 20'. Moving the house forward provides abetter quality backyard and gives better spacing from houses across the street. The lot is not very deep so at 30' front yard setback there is only 30' rear yard. Moving the house forward there is 41.44 setback from the street in the year yard. The zoning district also allows 20' setbacks on lots of records. Corner lots 50-80 are allowed a 20' setback; Lots with 60' or less width are allowed a 20' setback. Lake Lots are allowed a 20' setback This lot has 163' of frontage but the lot depth for the majority of the lot would not have enough buildable space so the lot effectively is not wider than 80'. Attached is two surveys one with meeting all setbacks which will not allow for a rear deck. The other which is surveyed to the requested variance. It is obvious which one flows better in the neighborhood. Thank you for considering the Variance. Sincerely / Loren Pellett -1057- HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE O w a OWNER'S NAME: V0 / .� � l�� _ - Ci A LOT AREA -' � `% F SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... LOT AREA / f SQ- FT. x 40 °le = (for Lots of Record) _�__.._.. _«.__..._._. .—C� �� U " Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE Ll L) x = I � C D TOTAL HOUSE ........................... ....................... !i i DETACHED BUILDINGS x (GARAGEtSHED) - x = TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................. DRIVEWAY, PARKING ., Ca x� = I C AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. x . j 4, X I , t- i1,(r�7 • 1t - r DECKS Open decks (114" min. ' " ` X / Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not x = counted as hardcover. x = TOTALDECK— .................................................... x = X TOTAL OTHER ..................... ............................... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ..................................... ............................... PREPARED Revised 1 /10 kLIPP P R 12074 Mii I I 0 0 0 u) N W O N _ r11 c s o o m a o 3 0 W O a m N i v m UI V Z J O ? ® O ❑ O O Q O d Z 05 0000 001 aup))so3 Y !1 W li Y Q rr�� rtr z F-a 4 W H WOz�M °nom a - Z Q 9 wB• d r o 0 O W FO- C9 J W w O m m m m rn P r It �i O W 04 0 a v p 4 v i0 m ti � o y m� o o m N O) W ° oll E N W N � x p O f 00 O O W W W O O 2 D fL ZZ Q Q Q m m" m anSo ^mb r/iV}7Om TDU - IUOy- N 4 DRIVE B ° hoN DOM +'ry off_,95'84 as � Ory 0 6R .BAZ O W „a. 5£. o Y � a O 1 c awm I •�' m" m anSo ^mb r/iV}7Om TDU - IUOy- 4 p � Ory 0 ET c Y � a O a c �a N East cc H-LAND SlJR E 1 I rG9 1 .A.© F.B. NO.NO Xxxx .6 - 1 rD Y LAND SURVEYORS ' 10" SCALE 1"= 30' 976.9 Proposed Top of Block 11947 Idaho Ave. N. ® Denotes Iron Monument Found 4}q TNH 139"N6'49' Champlin, Minnesota 55316 O Denotes Spikes Set W S E 976.5 Proposed Garage Floor PHONE (763) 323 -1300 ❑ Denotes Wood Hub Set 968 9 36" T FAX (763) 323 -7035 C For Excavation Only Proposed Lowest Floor hylandsurvey @qwestoffice.net x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation S Type of Building - �✓ur�P�l?r}� �pl'�jfjrtt�F = Denotes Proposed Elevation 963.430 FULL BASEMENT Sanitary MH -4- Denotes Surface Drainage Lookout 871.4 NOVAK FLECK Property Located In Part Of 963.43 RED OAK ROAD SW 1 A, Sec. 14Twp. 117 R. 24. saaimryMH Note: 12" of Snow on the Site wyD4.JD East cc NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 6 East 967.71 za' r .6 - 968.3fi - O 24",T' N) ' 10" CM O 12x12 .0 965.84 6 .06 nt ................ .................. 15.00 15.0° TNH 139"N6'49' _. X80 . i 968.86 CR= 971,18 966.4 966.47 36" T C w o 966.53 a Storm MH -. = 963.430 Sanitary MH 138.80 East cc NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 6 East 967.71 za' r 5��. - 968.3fi - O 24",T' N) 152.1 CM O 12x12 .0 DECK 1 97a.2'i 968.95 i 24° T ! ................ .................. 15.00 15.0° i X80 . i 2' Cant. c 19 T PROPOSED RESIDENCE 972,1 10.0 i Ca zo Note: Height of Building - 28' -4" - -- Note: Deck is impervious N O 0 - ° AREA: 13,148 Square Feet 114 �2 AREA OF HOUSE: 1,551 Square Feet a I o , AREA OF DRIVE: 819 Square Feet 974.48 `.��ry �� 974. 974.3 74.113 ,� 974.75 7 976 h r___ 976.5 .1- CJ 6� V� j GARAGE 90 I' m m a �T HOUSE TOB 1975.90 1975.57 .60 7.7 9]59 G PP r'T 9]5.48 975.21 LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" PP Overhead Wves Tp 562s in\ ll (O 976.62 h This survey is certified only to the above named person or persons and not to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. \ The only easements shown are from plats of record of information provided by client. All building dimensions and floor elevations must be verified by client. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Surveyed by us this 20TH day of MARCH 20 14 Milton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. No. 20262 Rev. March 24, 2014 Rev. March 27, 2014 Rev. April 24, 2014 ttev aprin au, zu1q Tc 967.24 697 Spike In Retaining 10 NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 6 East NE Corner of Lot 3 9 174 - _ -- East CM O J O w 0 0 971,18 36" T w o 972,1 10.0 i Ca zo Note: Height of Building - 28' -4" - -- Note: Deck is impervious N O 0 - ° AREA: 13,148 Square Feet 114 �2 AREA OF HOUSE: 1,551 Square Feet a I o , AREA OF DRIVE: 819 Square Feet 974.48 `.��ry �� 974. 974.3 74.113 ,� 974.75 7 976 h r___ 976.5 .1- CJ 6� V� j GARAGE 90 I' m m a �T HOUSE TOB 1975.90 1975.57 .60 7.7 9]59 G PP r'T 9]5.48 975.21 LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" PP Overhead Wves Tp 562s in\ ll (O 976.62 h This survey is certified only to the above named person or persons and not to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. \ The only easements shown are from plats of record of information provided by client. All building dimensions and floor elevations must be verified by client. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that 1 am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Surveyed by us this 20TH day of MARCH 20 14 Milton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. No. 20262 Rev. March 24, 2014 Rev. March 27, 2014 Rev. April 24, 2014 ttev aprin au, zu1q 976.9 Proposed Top of Block 976.5 proposed Garage Floor 968.9 Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building — FULL BASEMENT Walkout 96a4s RED OAK ROAD Sanitary MH Tc 965.84 LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" rvey is certified only to the above named person or persons t to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. ly easements shown are from plats of record of Information provided by client. NOVAK FLECK TNH ® 10.00 968.66 " PjfD °4$39 .4 Denotes 47 O Tc Spikes S, Stam 0 Storm M03 Denotes Wood Hu S.nR<.ry MH LOT 8, BLOCK 7, "MOUND TERRACE" rvey is certified only to the above named person or persons t to subsequent owners, mortgages or title insurers. ly easements shown are from plats of record of Information provided by client. NOVAK FLECK __— NE comer 100,00 V NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 3 Eost of Lot 6 East e CM O Jy O n mJ p �N 0 i 1 974.75 ! t r < � HOUSE .. . Tors 975. ®a -. 975.21 \ v -1061- bL AI-t t Denotes Iron Mon O Denotes Spikes S, 0 Denotes Wood Hu For Excavation Or x000.0 Denotes Existing n Denotes Proposec Denotes Surface Property Located in Part 0 SW 1 Z4. Sec. 14 Twp. 11 Note: 12" of Snow on th __— NE comer 100,00 V NE Corner 149.9 of Lot 3 Eost of Lot 6 East e CM O Jy O n mJ p �N 0 i 1 974.75 ! t r < � HOUSE .. . Tors 975. ®a -. 975.21 \ v -1061- -1062- r -rte ffill r- ik 1 I7 31 0 1;.I.4�i1ill�i/ Ti r'YI I' JS e VV �GO1aG. °.d.,.a r TM coaa+eciloea i ®o Iow taro. rio. ` d FNIMAN -1063- 0 -1064- -1065- Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: May 20, 2014 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 14 -05 Minor Subdivision and Planning Case No. 14 -06 Variances REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant is proposing a 3 lot minor subdivision of the 20,265 square foot property at 2201 Centerview Lane. The property currently includes an existing single family home that is anticipated to remain after the subdivision. Variance approvals are being concurrently requested as the 6.9 foot side setback for the existing house on Parcel C becomes non - conforming when the setback changes from 6 feet for a lot of record to 10 feet for a non lot of record. A variance is also being requested to address the minimum lot depth requirement as it applies to Parcel A. Given the configuration of Parcel A, it is unable to meet the 80 foot lot depth requirement. Staff notes that at 7,706 square feet, the parcel exceeds the 6,000 square foot minimum size requirement. In addition, portions of the lot due meet the 80 foot lot depth. The applicant has demonstrated that a house and garage can be placed on the lotdespite given its shape. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW ANDRECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their May6, 2014 meeting and recommended unanimously for approval of the requests. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION City policy requires the payment of the Trunk Area Water Charge and Trunk Area Sewer Charge prior to release of the resolution for recording. However, on a case -by -case basis, the Council has approved an alternate schedule to allow for these fees to to be collected as part of the building permit, if requested. Members are advised that the applicant has requested payment of these fees with the future building permits. RECOMMENDATION As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approvalof the requests, Staff has prepared the attached resolutions for your consideration. 12.1066 -third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION NO 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -05 PID # 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 WHEREAS, the applicants, Art and Barb King, submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create three buildable parcels from the existing lots of record that make up the property at 2201 Centerview Lane; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the regulations: and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the requirements of the R -2 District for a non - lot of record with the exception of the side setback for the existing house, which is currently 6.9 feet, and the minimum lot depth for Parcel A; and WHEREAS, the applicants submitted a variance request for these conditions; and -1067- WHEREAS, the 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has frontage on Noble Lane. The owners, who purchased the property in April 2013, indicated that the existing house would be retained on proposed Parcel C, if a subdivision was undertaken. The applicants also expressed interest in constructing a detached accessory structure on proposed Parcel C along with a future addition to connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey and are shown in conforming locations; and WHEREAS, whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121; and WHEREAS, the proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contains three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements; and WHEREAS, lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and are required to meet the same standards as new lots; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the minor subdivision application and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the minor subdivision application at its May 6, 2014 meeting and recommended approval with conditions; WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the minor subdivision request at its May 27, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the minor subdivision request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subject lots have frontage on improved public streets and municipal utilities are available. 3. The applicants have demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single - family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. I.S 4. The two, new proposed single- family residential lots will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 5. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the exception of the existing side setback for the existing house, which is 6.9 feet and is not changing as a result of the subdivision. 6. Lot depth for Parcel A, as proposed, is reasonable as the City's definition is difficult to apply in this case due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is 7706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of proposed Parcel A meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound that the minor subdivision requested by the applicants is hereby approved with the following conditions: The variance application is approved. Driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. 3. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 4. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 5. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. Applicants shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. Applicants are advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and /or earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of mounds. The City maintains some general information about possible sites in an inventory of the "Earthwork/Mound /Burial Areas" contained on the Cultural Resources Map in the Mound Comprehensive Plan and in surveys of the burial sites from Hill and Lewis in 1911 but the completeness or accuracy of this information is unknown. Additional information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist. Any formal investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound or burial area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not relieve the owner or the developer of that responsibility. 1069- 8. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to the release of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100.00 for each of the two additional lots for a total of $2,200.00. 9, Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for the two (2) additional lots at the time of building permit unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Council. The amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit. 10. Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for the two (2) additional lots at the time of bullding permit. The amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit. 11. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of $240.00 for the new two (2) additional lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. 12. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the two (2) new lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 13. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements, these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution or submittal of a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee) and submitted of an cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. The minor subdivision is approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit A . Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor 1 1 RESOLUTION NO 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR PROPERTY AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 14-06 PID # 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 WHEREAS, the applicants, Art and Barb King, submitted a request for a minor subdivision to create three buildable parcels from the existing lots of record that make up the property at 2201 Centerview Lane; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot and evaluation of the proposed new lots' conformity with the regulations: ; and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the requirements of the R -2 District for a non - lot of record with the exception of the side setback for the existing house, which is currently 6.9 feet, and the minimum lot depth for Parcel A; and WHEREAS, variance approval was requested to address these two conditions; and -1071- WHEREAS, the 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has frontage on Noble Lane. The owners, who purchased the property in April 2013, indicated that the existing house would be retained on proposed Parcel C, if a subdivision was undertaken. The applicants also expressed interest in constructing a detached accessory structure on proposed Parcel C along with a future addition to connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey and are shown in conforming locations; and WHEREAS, the proposed 3 -lot arrangement qualified as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contains three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; 1072- (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report dated April 30, 2014 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and are required to meet the same standards as new lots; and WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the variance request and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the variance request at its May 6, 2014 meeting and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its May 27, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria in Sec. 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the exception of the existing side setback for the existing house, which is 6.9 feet and not changing as a result of the subdivision and lot depth. 3. A variance for lot depth for Parcel A is reasonable as the City's definition is difficult to apply due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is 7706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of proposed Parcel A meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance request with the following conditions: The minor subdivision is approved. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -1073- 3. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 4. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all applicable conditions have been met. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 8. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the variance application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The variances are approved for the property described on the attached Exhibit A . Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of May 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -1074- MINUTE EXCERPTS MAY 6, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist & Pete Wiechert. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: Kent Friedrichsen (5913 Fairfield Rd); Jordan Korczak (5921 Fairfield Rd); Art & Barb King (2964 Pelican Point Cir); Loren Pellet (5660 Sunnybrook Cir); Matt Van Nelson (2925 Meadow La); Grant Johnson (6347 Bay Ridge Rd) BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -05 3 Lot Minor Subdivision &Variance 2201 Centerview Lane Applicant: Art and ;Barb "'King Trapp introduced the case consisting of two variances: 1) existing home to property edge on the south and 2) parcel A lot depth. Trapp noted that the lot depth meets standards on the north side but not on the south due to the shape of the lot. The existing home is planned to be kept and the applicant is planning to construct a detached garage and possibly a connector breezeway. Property is guided low density residential and zoned R2. The lot of record designation disappears once the property has been subdivided. Parcel "A" is an irregularly shaped lot with inadequate lot depth on one side. Staff has determined that it makes more sense to process this deficiency as a variance. There are no floodplain or wetland issues. Park dedication will be required at $1100 per lot. Preliminary review triggers no watershed requirement until building permit issuance. Water and sewer will have to be stubbed to the property line. Hardcover is very close to 30% on all three parcels and house pads are demonstrated. The list of conditions is pretty standard and findings of fact are included. Art King — 2964 Pelican Point Cir —Water connection points seem to be there. House size could be increased with the use of permeable pavers. Discussion Retterath supports the project. It's put together pretty nicely. The utility issues will get sorted out. Wegscheid agreed with Retterath. MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to recommend approval to include recommendations and findings of Staff. MOTION carried unanimously. -1075- r _.. GITY C7f' h40UNa__ PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner DATE: April 30, 2014 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: May 6, 2014 OWNERS: Art and Barb King APPLICANT: Art King REQUEST: Minor Subdivision and Variance - 2201 Centerview Lane CASE NUMBER: 14 -01 and 14 -06 PROPERTY ID: 13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 ZONING: R -2 Single and Two Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential The applicant is proposing a 3 lot minor subdivision of the property at 2201 Centerview Lane and is requesting review by the Planning Commission. Variance approval is also being requested as the 6.9 foot side setback for the existing house on Parcel C becomes non- conforming when the setback changes from 6 feet for a lot of record to 10 feet for a non -lot of record and to address the minimum lot depth requirement as it applies to Parcel A. Planning Commission members may recall that a concept /sketch plan for this property was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at its the November 5, 2013 meeting and a "modified" concept /sketch plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its March 4, 2014 meeting. -1076- SITE INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND The 20,265 square foot property currently includes an existing single family home that was constructed in 1940 and fronts Centerview Lane. The property also has frontage on Noble Lane. The owner, who purchased the property in April 2013, has indicated that the existing house would be retained on parcel C if a subdivision was undertaken. The applicant has also expressed interest in constructing a detached accessory structure on parcel C along with a future addition to connect the existing house with the proposed detached garage. Both the proposed detached garage and future addition are shown on the submitted subdivision survey. REVIEW PROCEDURE Subdivision Whenever a subdivision of land is proposed, the subdividing owner, or authorized agent, shall apply and secure approval from the City of Mound in accordance with the procedures set forth in City Code Chapter 121. The proposed lot arrangement qualifies as a minor subdivision as described in Sec. 121 -35 (1) of the City Code as it contain three or fewer residential lots and does not involve the construction of public facilities or public improvements. Variance. City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; -1077- (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. TIMELINES FOR ACTION Minnesota statutes require approval or denial of a subdivision request by an agency within 120 days. The minor subdivision application was submitted on April 1, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 120 -day rule for the subdivision application and was determined to be April 2, 2014. The City's deadline for action on the minor subdivision request is on or around July 30, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 requires approval or denial of a zoning request within 60 -days unless an extension is executed. The variance application was received on April 21, 2014. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule for land use applications in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 15.99 and was determined to be April 22, 2014. Therefore, the City's deadline for action on the variance application, unless an extension is executed, is on or around June 20, 2014. LAND USE Comprehensive Plan —The City's current Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Low Density Residential, which allows for single - family detached and attached housing types within the density range of 1 to 6 units per acre. Density is computed area wide as opposed to an individual site. The proposed subdivision meets the Comprehensive Plan guidance. Zoning —The subject property is located in the R -2 (Single and Two Family Residential) zoning district and subject to the regulations contained in Sec. 129 -102 of the City Code. It should be noted that lots approved as part of a minor subdivision, including those with existing structures, are no longer eligible for "lot of record" status and must meet the same standards as new lots. The following table shows the minimum requirements for the R -2 District for a single - family lot. Based on Staff review of the proposed lot configuration, the proposed new lots meet the requirements with the exception of the side setback for the existing house which is currently 6.9 feet. A variance has been requested as the side setback for a non -lot of record is 10 feet. 1 Note: Some dimensions are approximate and were determined by Staff. Floodplain. Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 23 (Floodplain) in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be floodplain on the subject property. Per code, all new structures must meet or exceed the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation or be three feet above the OHWH of wetland, as applicable. This will be a condition of approval for the subdivision. Wetlands . Based on preliminary review of aerial information and Figure 2.4 (Wetlands) from the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan, there does not appear to be wetlands on the subject property. Park Land Dedication. Dedication of park land and /or payment of fees in lieu of land dedication is required by Sec. 121 -121 of the City Code. If a future subdivision is approved, Staff recommends the submittal of a cash payment in lieu of park dedication. For minor subdivisions, the approved 2014 fee is $1,100.00 per lot. As one credit would be granted for the existing lot, $2,200.00 in park dedication fees would be required for a proposed 3 -lot subdivision. Park dedication fees will be collected prior to the release of the resolution for recording. -1079- INFRASTRUCTURE Storm Water. Stormwater permitting is under the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) following regulatory authority turn back to the District by the Mound City Council which took place in August, 2011. MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The 2014 MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. MCES charge will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the two (2) lots and shall be the amount in effect at the time. City Water /Sewer Trunk Area Charges. The 2014 trunk water fee is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2014 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Payment of trunk water and trunk sewer charges for each of the two (2) additional lots will be collected prior to release of the resolution. Applicant is advised that a request can be made to the Council to request these fees be paid at time of building permit issuance for the future new homes similar to the MCES SAC charges; however, the amount would then be the fee in effect at that time. City Water /Sewer Connection Fees. The 2014 sewer connection fee is $240.00 per lot and the 2014 water connection fee is $240.00 for each of the two (2) additional lots. This will be collected at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the amounts in effect at the time. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the sketch plan application and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received to date have been summarized below: Public Works Director Carlton Moore Building Official Scott Qualle Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok Finance Director Catherine Pausche There are utility services available to the existing house only. There are no water or sewer services stubbed to the proposed new lots. I have no comment. No issues. I have no comment. City Engineer Dan Faulkner Everything seems to be in order; no comments. t:1 MCWD District Rep. Tom Dietrich Xcel Energy Rep. Lynn Longfield DISCUSSION After preliminary review, no District rules will be triggered by sub - division of the parcel at 2201 Centerview Lane in Mound. However, the individual property owners of the newly subdivided lots will be subject to the District's Erosion Control rule for any proposed homes with disturbance exceeding 5,000 square feet or 50 cubic yards of excavation. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. See attached email dated 4 -14 -2014. 1. The property currently has lot of record status and therefore meets setback requirements. However, once the minor subdivision occurs all three lots will be subject to the R -2 lot standards for new lots or non -lot of record. This will result in the lot with the existing home to have a nonconforming side yard setback (south) of 6.9 feet. A variance has been submitted by the applicant for this condition as part of the subdivision process. Staff is supportive of this variance request given that it is an existing condition resulting from the 1940 placement of the home on the property rather than a variance being created by the subdivision process itself. 2. One of the discussion items during the Planning Commission's review of the concept /sketch plans was the lot depth for proposed Parcel A (Lot 14 & 15) and how it is determined based on the configuration of the lot. The definition for lot depth is the mean horizontal distance between the front and rear property lines. Using the information provided in the submitted plan and application of the lot depth definition, per code, the lot depth for Parcel A is approximately 71 feet which is less than the required 80 foot minimum. However, it is important to note that portions of the north side of the lot meet the lot depth. The application of the definition to this lot is difficult due to its configuration. It is also important to note that the Parcel A is the largest of the 3 proposed lots. Members may recall that the Planning Commission's discussion at the March 2014 meeting was that lot depth determination for this lot, according to the code, was difficult due to its shape. At the direction of Staff, the applicant has applied for a variance to lot depth for this parcel. Given the size of the lot and its orientation Staff is supportive of this variance. -1081- Permitting for wetlands (with the exception of WCA boundary determination), stormwater, floodplain alteration, erosion control and shoreline alteration is the responsibility of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) effective September 2011, 4. The applicant has confirmed that there are no bank mortgages or liens on the subject property. 5. Applicant is advised that the hardcover for the subject lots is very close to the 30 percent maximum. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested minor subdivision and variance for the property at 2201 Centerview Lane subject to the following conditions: 1. Driveways must be hard surfaced in accordance with City Code regulations. Minimum driveway width is 10 feet; maximum width is 24 feet. 2. Drainage shall not be directed to neighboring properties. 3. Any curb, gutter and streets which are disturbed because of construction, including but not limited to, installation of the water service, sewer service and small utilities, shall be the responsibility of the permit holder. 4. As part of the City's approval of the subdivision, the dedication of public drainage and utility easements, to be determined by the Public Works Director, will be required and shall be submitted in a form to allow for recording at Hennepin County, and shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City, prior to recording. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all public agency permits including the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. Applicant is advised that there are historic indian burial mounds and /or earthwork sites in and around the City of Mound. While many of the mounds have been severely impacted by development over the years, the mounds do, however, receive protection under state law; and penalties are imposed for unauthorized disturbance of mounds. The City maintains some general information about possible sites in an inventory of the "Earthwork /Mound /Burial Areas' contained on the Cultural Resources Map in the Mound Comprehensive Plan and in surveys of the burial sites from Hill and Lewis in 1911 but the completeness of accuracy of this information is unknown. Additional information may be obtained through the Minnesota State Archeologist. Any formal investigation of a site, including a determination of whether a mound or burial area exists on a subject site, is the responsibility of the property owner or -1082- developer. The issuance of permits by the City to do work on a site does not relieve the owner or the developer of that responsibility. 7. Payment of park dedication fees as required by Sec. 121 of the City Code prior to the release of the resolution for recording. The amount due is $1,100.00 for each of the two (2) new lots ($2200.00 total.) 8. Payment of Trunk Area Water Charges for each of the two (2) additional lots prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule is requested and approved by the Council. The amount due is 4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit, if an alternate schedule is requested and is approved by the Council. 9 Payment of Trunk Area Sewer Charges for each of the two (2) additional lots prior to the release of the resolution unless an alternate schedule requested and is approved by the Council. The amount due is $4,000.00 or the current amount in effect at the time of the building permit if an alternate schedule is requested and approved by the Council. 10. Payment of sewer connection fee of $240.00 and water connection fee of $240.00 for each of the new two (2) additional lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. 11. Payment of the MCES SAC charge for each of the two (2) new lots shall be required at the time of building permit issuance. The amount due shall be the current amount in effect at the time. 12. As applicable, if the subdivision requires the construction of utility improvements, these activities must be constructed and installed prior to the release of the resolution or submittal of a contractor's estimate, which shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works Director (or designee) and submitted of an cash escrow in the amount of 125 percent of the contractor's estimate. In recommending approval of the minor subdivision and variance, Staff offers the following findings: 1. The subdivision is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The subject lots have frontage on improved public streets and municipal utilities are available. 3. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed lot arrangement can accommodate the construction of new single - family homes with conforming setbacks and hardcover. 4. The two new proposed single - family residential lots will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or have an adverse impact on adjoining property. 5. The criteria in Sec. 129 -39 (a) are being met. 6. The proposed new lots meet the standards for a non -lot of record with the exception of the existing side setback for the existing house which is 6.9 and is not changing as a result of the subdivision. I: Variance for lot depth for Parcel A is reasonable as the City's definition is difficult to apply due to its proposed shape /configuration. The lot size for proposed Parcel A is 7,706 sq. ft. which exceeds the 6,000 sq. ft. requirement. Portions of the proposed parcel meet or exceed the 80 foot minimum lot depth requirement. The applicant has demonstrated that a house and garage can be placed on the lot given its shape. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation(s) is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the minor subdivision and variance requests will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible dates are Tuesday, May 13, 2014 or Tuesday, May 27, 2014. 1:I APR 1 2044 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952- 472 -0620 i Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. PLANNING COMM. DATE CASE NO. CITY COUNCIL DATE: Please type or print clearly EXISTING Subject Address 1-20 1 CIENTEPZVIE.W LAME PROPERTY i'A ok LEGAL Lot 14,IW�Ir_�ock_ Subdivision 1'1BEp+wA LttNGou/ Bspl ITHIIJ DESCRIPTION PID# 13-111-7-q-91-0040 Zoning: R7 R1A a R3 87 B2 B3 (Circle one) APPLICANT The applicant is: owner other _ Email Aer. Vt��@ itilF�'TEC.N.cop\ Name Ara-r sX/ "" Vtt b Address �Zq (a i pEl°t.C}tN Pbl t rT c j 9-GLE- Moor-+§o MN 4 Phone Home Gf?-760 -846-1 Work (nib- -707--t2q®i Fax & -- 76*2-�� OWNER Name k{ r 1' BARB l N L Email lk2t I3AEL kLtiG (,P C (if other than applicant) Address A-na Pra ai4&bV . Phone Home Work Fax SURVEYOR/ Name 5MVEAf V. t{E Email 5i5CNO-19 PR£wtrEZ- 5VRI(Eq. �6 ENGINEER Address F8 QDX 234. VIOToai,*,t ywx) ss38fo Phone Office Cell iS2 °31?3-0Yf"7 Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? ( ) yes, fro no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premi escribed in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posti g, m 'tai ' g 77 such notices as may be required by law. l Applicants Si nature Date ( 1114 Owner's Signature Date Minor Subdivision Information (1A 8/2013) Page 4 of 4 -1085- L-1 Z 126 1 t,f VARIANCE �w D APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date IYIAk l 6-rN Case No. City Council Date prim 17 TO Please t it nr nrint leaihiv SUBJECT Address "2.2-01 C9 4 tti M l tA) i._.A W F ca p Lot t 1 °� 1 M DuS�,D &2L91, uf}`rT� j' Block PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. Subdivisio7onA�t2v`RAiM Lit,tol- Ii ,AApi-no;J LA- yYFsof PA�2-�' PID# 1.7 =11"1 "2-q'3i -06°r0 Zoning: Rt R1A0 R3 81 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name JMIRT- a i3 .A-e-15 `((*t(cz, Email 1Aer • Kr fU @T{tl' ( (aC OWNER 71�� Address 2564 42�C& Tblf ✓T C I I/ujoiwQ• 00 553b Phone Home h2--7W-'3q5-7 Work Fax (bQ_= 112-12-6 i APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conortlonai use permit, or otner zoning proceeure for this property? Yes ( ) No If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutio s. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): �crgDltflslar� ©� i�rrs V��s �xisTi�+� sr¢�-ru�e� t�aN- C O N 1502 U t IJ 6 N O%_ ' 1,31F .1 6 A � Lv I LL F3, CON-550N fo C� AND 14AT CIT11 Vacs 'tHC L_aT 'DEPTH Gds PZT- variance Information G n ,r n (10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 �}U THE- '�(��1�1� PS?1 -H f f? PPrRCEA, ILI I 1, I AC10u86 �� AS PMt P0sF-f� } Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (x). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): _'51 OF- VOID REQUIRED OD -J W051 SLOE lS eVoN-Cbr./t'C ti(-- � YGfIiC J'�t13C7 CC>31�J�. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ( N (a W) 20 ft. 2 5t l ft. - ft. Side Yard: ( N S E(D) 10 ft. Ga 9 ft. y,_ft, Side Yard: (N S E W) to ft. L D ft. _. ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W) 9 ft. 2 ©. ft. -f) ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. - ®" ft. Lot Size: 000 -sq ft ink i8 sq ft -'Cy sq ft Hardcover: 3C76 18 r 14 sa ft Leo 5 —s-1 ft =0 sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes W, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? Atoo narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage X existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape "other: specify Please describe: S t 5r ALA• CG-I-At"&rZ -S 15 t /VK-wd LAJ 64L Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 1: GO Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes )4, No ( ). If yes, explain: 7 Nj;.16 014, r-tof ©N Sl0or— L-OT 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (1\6 If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes W, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by IpW. Owner's Applican Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 6 of 6 1088- Date Z! 11q Date 21 f (, _ Sarah Smith From: Longfield, Lynn M [ Lynn .M.Longfield @xcelenergy.com] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 1:50 PM To: Jill Norlander; Ray Hanson; Dan Faulkner; Scott Qualle; Manderschied, Melissa J.; Rita Trapp, Greg Pederson (gpederson @moundfire.com), Coney Farniok; Carlton Moore; Catherine Pausche; Jack Gleason; tdietrich @minnehahacreek.org; Alta Denisova Centerpoint; Christopher Thompson Mediacom; Steven Storo Frontier; Anderson, Bonnie J Cc: Sarah Smith Subject: RE: Centerview Subdivision Attachments: 2201 Centerview Ln, Mound.pdf; GIS Map Symbols Legend_2010.pdf Xcel Energy has electrical facilities in this area of subdivision. Please see attached GIS map & legend of symbols. Thank you, Lynn Longfield < >< Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature 5505 Manitou Road, Excelsior, MN, 55331 952.470.3313, C: 612.669.4138, 952.470.3310 E: lynn.m.longfield@xcelenergy.com Please consider the environment before printing this email. Also, please excuse any brevity andlor typos in this email. —This e -mail, and any attachments, may contain confidential or private material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments, From: Jill Norlander [ mailto •jillnorlander@cityofmound.com} Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 3:36 PM To: Ray Hanson; Dan Faulkner; Scott Qualle; Manderschied, Melissa J.; Rita Trapp; Greg Pederson (gpedersongmoundfire com); Correy Farniok; Carlton Moore; Catherine Pausche; Jack Gleason; tdietrich(dminnehahacreek.org; Alla Denisova Centerpoint; Christopher Thompson Mediacom; Longfield, Lynn M; Steven Storo Frontier; Anderson, Bonnie J Cc: Sarah Smith Subject: Centerview Subdivision Please review and respond to Sarah by April 21 ". Thanks. crrr.. n,,+Wa Sill Norlander, Admin Assist 952 -472 -0607 Phone 952- 472 -0620 Fax City Hall Hours MQN - FRI 8:00 - 4:30 -1089- 1 Smallworld Electric Distribution Symbols January 2010 Primary Meter NM Non - metered Facility Manhole Retired Manhole Generic Pad Transformer Pad Medical Alert Condition -(- Lot Centroid Xcel /Unknown Dist. Pole xy l,. Foreign Dist. Pole overhea d Cust. Owned Dist. Pole C) Xcel /Unknown Orn. Pole -,, O Cust. Owned Orn. Pole -\, Xcel Trans. Pole C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9 Foreign Trans. Pole t'tru Xcel Trans. Tower fisb PMH -10 Electric Riser �. 95, Primary Open " 9(¢ n Anchor Guy Substation Push Brace Ground Brace -- H Fixture Primary Meter NM Non - metered Facility Manhole Retired Manhole Generic Pad Transformer Pad Medical Alert Condition -(- Lot Centroid Vault xy l,. Retired Vault overhea d Secondary Transformer Secondary Pedestal -,, O Metered Secondary -\, Streetlight Control C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9 Secondary Splice Box t'tru Primary Splice Box fisb PMH -10 Retired Splice Box �. 95, Primary Open " 9(¢ n Secondary Open Primary Meter NM Non - metered Facility Manhole Retired Manhole Generic Pad Transformer Pad Medical Alert Condition -(- Lot Centroid Deferral Cabinet Transformers f - Switching Facility Symbols overhea d Underground Switch Centers -,, O One -phase -\, � (3 PMH -3 C5) PMH -5 (D PMH -9 OH & UG Switch t'tru Agp fisb PMH -10 C1j pMH -11 PMH -12 �. 95, Three - phase " 9(¢ n Automated 0 Unknown Substation wye -wye Elbow Center Two -phase wye -delta ��,. 9� Open Elbow C/ Closed Elbow 9� Three -phase Open Cable Terminator C wye -delta Closed Cable Terminator �tp n Step-up/ Vacuum Switch Step -down Vacuum Interrupter �p P Three - phase delta "` ; Y�� Busbar -delta Directional. Nightwatch d1 One -phase �' _ i Area Nightwatch delta 41 . _7 Three -phase V O I —� Xcel /Unknown Street Light P delta -wye - �- Cust. Owned Street Light 9� poopen Three -phase ,VV 9�P ; < Ornamental Light delta -open delta Lightning Arrestor Deferral Cabinet SSj Sectionalizer Bank Substation ((j l Cogeneration Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color. Neutral Isolating Device Primary Intersect ® Connector UG Primary Splice Component Primary Splice UG Secondary Splice • Switches & Fuses f - Closed F Open OH & UG Point Disconnect Switch 2a X OH & UG Switch t'tru Agp OH & UG ATO 1AT1011 OH & UG Fuse °1a OCB Substation OCBI SSj Sectionalizer Bank Substation ((j l Cogeneration Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color. Neutral Isolating Device Primary Intersect ® Connector UG Primary Splice Component Primary Splice UG Secondary Splice • Clrcutt Breaker f - OH Capacitor F UG Capacitor Regulator Bank Point °) Recloser Bank SSj Sectionalizer Bank Substation ((j l Cogeneration Note: Actual Location Symbols are 1/2 size of the normal symbols _1091_ ay in color. Neutral Isolating Device Primary Intersect ® Connector UG Primary Splice Component Primary Splice UG Secondary Splice • Mid -Span Tap n Cable Failure Indicator F Fault Indicator Locator Symbol Status: Black denotes "Install" status Symbol with an X denotes "Remove" status Electric XY Primary Structure Node Secondary Structure Node Misc Electric Landmark Point Error Symbol: Errorwith Attributes; Unable to Symbol Status: Black denotes "Install" status Symbol with an X denotes "Remove" status Primary and Secondary Change Marker OH Prim — + - - - -- OH Sec UG Sec i Annotation Mules UG Fuse size is not annotated on distribution maps. NSP -MN and NSP WI The following are NOT annotated: 65 Amp Fuses (size) • UG 1/0 Secondaries • UG 6 Duplex Street Wire • UG 4/0 AL TX feeding a pedestal. (Do not make 4/0 secondaries feeding pedestal coincident.) PSCO and SPS The following are NOT annotated: • OH 65 Amp Fuses (size) • UG 350 Al Triplex Secondary • UG 12/2 Cu Duplex Secondary Component One Phase Component Two Phase Component Three Phase Component Mainline Component Secondary Secondary Neutral Only 2 Wire Service _._______.____ --- _____ 3 Wire Service "- - - -- __ - - - --` 4 Wire Service Transmission Line Span Guy Error Symbol: Error with Attributes; Unable to Symbolize Correctly Customer Pointer Retired UG Primary - Retired UG Secondary Conduit Retired Conduit = - -- Duct Bank Retired Duct Bank UG Route Trench -- -- -.._- .....--- _.____.. UG Route Joint Trench Joint Trench Line Tunnel Gas Tunnel Cable Segments Cable Segment Break Point 0 Cable Segment - Cable Segment Delete Old Cable Segment If you find discrepancies on a map, please make the necessary changes on the Map Copy and send it (along with your name and location) to: Minnesota Colorado Mapping Department Mapping Department c/o Allan Radke, Mgr c/o Bill Lucatuorto, Mgr Chestnut Service Center (CSC) - I Lipan Distribution Center (LDC) - 1 ^° for — Art King 2201 Centerview Lane Mound, Mn 55364 Proposed Parcel A: That part of Lots 14, 15, 19. and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 14; thence South 60 degrees 12 minutes 23 seconds East, assumed bearing along the northeasterly line of said Lot 14, 85.44 feet. to the Northeast corner of said Lot 14; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lot 14, 23.40 feet, thence South 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53 feet to a point on the southwesterly line ofsaid Lot 19, distant 80.00 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 19, as measured along said southwesterly line; thence North 60 degrees 15 minutes 17 seconds West, along said southwesterly line of Lot 19, and its northwesterly extension, 56.88 feet, to the West line of said Block 6, thence North 00 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds West, along said West line, 68.72 feet to the southeasterly line of Downs Ave., as dedicated in said plat thence North 29 degrees 48 minutes 32 seconds East, along the northwesterly line of said Lot 14, 40.01 feet to the point of beginning. Proposed Parcel B: Lot 21, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of Lot 20 in said plat described as fol lows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 21; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 49 seconds West, assumed bearing along the northwesterly line of said Lot 20, 23.40 feet; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, thence North 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds East, along said southeasterly line, 24.15 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 20, thence North 60 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds West, along the northeasterly fine of said Lot 20, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. Proposed Parcel C: That part of Lots 19 and 20, Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 20; thence South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, assumed bearing along the southeasterly line of said Lot 20, 24.15 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue South 29 degrees 56 minutes 41 seconds West, along the southeasterly line of said Lots 19 and 20, 75.73 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 19; thence North 60 degrees 15 minute 17 seconds West, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 19, 80.00 feet; thence North 25 degrees 55 minutes 29 seconds West, 76.53 feet, to the West line of said Lot 20; thence South 59 degrees 41 minutes 56 seconds East, 85.36 feet to the point of beginning. Hard Surface Calculations: Parcel A: Parcel B: Parcel C: Lot Area: 7706 s.f Lot Area: 6281 s.f. Lot Area: 6278 s.f. Prop, House: 1040 s.f. Prop. House: 874 s.f. Exist. House: 627 s.f. Prop. Gar: 480 s.f. Prop. Gar: 480 s.f. Prop. Add.: 240 s.f. Prop. DW.• 636 s.f. Prop. DW 479 s.f. Prop. Gar.: 480 s.f. Total H.S.: 2156 s.f. Total H.S.: 1833 s.f Prop. DW.- 458 s.f. H.S. % 27.98 H.S, %: 29.18 Total H. S.: 1805 s.f H. S. %: 28.75 1 hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ` 0 940.9 6 X CL I s o X X n0 ga 3 gag ° °i POND 3 , 940.1 /XSao 6 1 X X gpti o � 941.4 / X '\, \ 940.9 C / Xry \ \ S S ^9/4 - Sb,Oo r 6075 SS x g 8 g �2? °� hO O `` BSS S6 F / 1.a � / m °�. o o � � o` �p0.,� �\ Doti � / gd'�6 ' x CEp. 3 5 / O� PAR /e gQ0"g sco •0C y ,1 '¢ / yo J �J�J ° \ h, / 1 o o�s a $ \ 4 r� 4( \ apn m ° g ry /X L X g1 941.8 N, pb \ X C7 Ljx W a 7,9, oQ 2> g�� h � `. ua^ n 41 �C31 o / l `S9� rygs °j Saa�A \3 \ 00 0,�m�o� 9n Fbsr "n 9G�c X5 gAry N X garL W (,�/+ g8� X e °V ��O / V �6 W f]�" I \ / w 949.y e6 $O °J /'�•� g0. Q'( hXgS saa. o 944.1`- \ X r 3y / 943.7 S6 r /c�' tr0!- O 222 2 oX °o / q ?° ` rasa x945.9 N 949.7 19 �`o \� �g� ti 0 5 a / < "sas.o 6O 76.171> 600, zaa ttr} 2� 952.0 g6�< 7 0 /c. \ � '�' `�' s. e"'a � t ry�b co <NF <YyFF / g 219 C2 Ore <it,FOOC 3 18 952.0 / 948.2 y"" Existing Property Description: Lots 14, 19, 20, 21, and that part of Lot 15 lying Northeasterly of the /X aoo Northeasterly line of Lot 18, extended Northwesterly across said Lot 15, all in Block 6, ABRAHAMLINCOLN ADDITION LAKE SIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject to easements of record. Containing 20,265 sq. ft / 0.46 Acres +/- 22703 03131114 REVISED: 04122114 - PARCEL A & B Steven V. Ische License No. Date REVISED: 04/01/14 - PARCEL C Traverse PC Note: Sewer & Water services shown as marked by City of Mound and as -built plans sewer service shown per 1963 as -built plan prepared by Schoell & Madsen LEGEND O Set Iron Monument Found Iron Monument Q Sanitary Manhole —w--- Watermain —ss— Sanitary Sewer © Catch Basin x945.0 Existing Elevation x(945.0) Proposed Elevation -- - - - -- Proposed Surface Drainage OREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 952 - 443 -3010 -1093- 11111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111 iiiiiiiiiiiilii t ' • Property Address: 2201 Centerview Lane Mound, Mn 55364 Description of Property Surveyed. Lots 14, 19, 20, 21, and that part of Lot 15 lying Northeasterly of the Northeasterly line of Lot 18, extended Northwesterly across said Lot 15, all in Block 6, ABRAHAM LINCOLN ADDITION LAKE SIDE PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Subject' to easements of record. Containing 20,265 sq. ft / 0.46 Acres +/- Hard Cover Calculations: Existing House: 625 sq. ft. Existing Sidewalk: 85 sq. ft. Existing Driveway. 691 sq. ft. Total Hard Cover. 1401 sq. ft. Hard Cover %: 6.91 I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 22703 12116113 Steven v Ische License No. Date Traverse PC i / / I M LEGEND O Set Iron Monument Found Iron Monument �m c° u° POND sso � h � ey�sr 21 14 W �\ / �� gs Np x\96 /} Z / 20 15 Nsoo / � 8s36, 'g F T n OF 19 3 ?� \ }C11 �' N o 60 7s �� 2�3• �� sa r 7 'a- 18 i Revised 12119113 - Interior Lot Dimensions Revised 01107114 - Hard Cover Calculations m �nj n oh ry y �a OREMIER LAND SURVEYING. LLC 952 - 443 -3010 -1094 - RE.CT APR 12014 Government Finance Officers Association 203 N. LaSalle Street - Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 Phone(312)977 -9700 Fax(312)977 -4806 November 15, 2013 Kandis M. Hanson City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364 Dear Ms. Hanson: We are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 qualifies for a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. The Certificate of Achievement plaque will be shipped to: Catherine Pausche Director of Finance & Administrative Services under separate cover in about eight weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A sample news release is enclosed to assist with this effort. In addition, details of recent recipients of the Certificate of Achievement and other information about Certificate Program results are available in the "Awards Program" area of our website, www.gfoa.org. We hope that your example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excellence in financial reporting. Sincerely, Government Finance Officers Association AVOIU41 � Stephen J. Gauthier, Director Technical Services Center SJG /ds -1095- Government Finance Officers Association 203 N. LaSalle Street - Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 a Phone (312) 977 -9700 Fax(312)977-4806 11/15/2013 NEWS RELEASE For Information contact: Stephen Gauthier (312)977 -9700 (Chicago) - -The Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting has been awarded to City of Mound by the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) for its comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR). The Certificate of Achievement is the highest form of recognition in the area of governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. An Award of Financial Reporting Achievement has been awarded to the individual(s), department or agency designated by the government as primarily responsible for preparing the award- winning CAFR. This has been presented to: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance & Administrative Services The CAFR has been judged by an impartial panel to meet the high standards of the program including demonstrating a constructive "spirit of full disclosure" to clearly communicate its financial story and motivate potential users and user groups to read the CAFR, The GFOA is a nonprofit professional association serving approximately 17,500 government finance professionals with offices in Chicago, IL, and Washington, D.C. -1096- Kandis Hanson Subject: FW: Right -of -Entry form for Surfside launch for inspectors From: Jay Green [ma ! Ito: JaygreenfishingLd)yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 3:43 PM To: Kandis Hanson Cc: Catherine Pausche; Greg Nybeck Subject: Right -of -Entry form for Surfside launch for inspectors Kandis, The LMCD staff is preparing to send the city the Right -of -Entry form for the Surfside access that would allow our watercraft inspectors to perform inspections for the 2014 boating season. In the discussion with the city council last year, there were two additional requirements that needed to be met for this season. The first was to provide a summary of the inspection data from last season, including the number of potentially infested watercraft encountered. I have compiled that data and that report will be included. The second was for AIS preventative information to be distributed by the nspectors. I worked with the LMCD's AIS Tack Force, as well as members of the DNR's AIS Advisory Committee, to determine what information was available and what suited our needs the best. For the 2014 season, we will begin distributing a pamphlet that is produced by the DNR called "Help Protect Minnesota's Waters ". It includes basic preventative measures and also what is required by law. We are also going to reproduce and distribute a more comprehensive AIS booklet. This booklet, which is used by number of other groups, includes more detailed information on many styles of boats as well as docks, boatlifts and more. This booklet will be made available to the member cities, and also available to the public through the sheriff's water patrol, marinas and other locations around the lake. Both of these handouts will be included as well. Thanks Jay Green LMCD Representative - Mound -1097- MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manaq ,' Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer 5341. MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH. (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cltyofmound.com RE: Update on costs to move City Hall and upgrade the Centennial Building as rental property for non - profits A report on the cost of moving City Hall was printed in the Spring /Summer edition of the City Contact. An update of the report is now available that better defines and more accurately depicts the categories of spending. In the last months of 2012, the Cities of Mound and Orono completed negotiations for contracted police services, leaving vacant the police space at the Mound Public Safety Facility. A two -fold decision was made by the City of Mound: 1) Mound City Hall would move to the former police space, and 2) the former City Hall would be converted to rental space for non - profit and quasi - governmental organizations. (Currently, the Centennial Building has four tenants with room for 1 -3 more tenants. It has served to provide space for a sector of organizations otherwise underserved.) The spreadsheet attached shows the cost o£ 1) preparing a police precinct for use by Orono PD, 2) the cost of conversion of police office space for use as a city hall, and 3) the cost of conversion of former city hall to rental space. Finally, it shows the cost of maintenance and repairs that were due the two buildings. From a business perspective, the return on investment related to these building improvements is considered healthy -10 months for improvements to new City Hall space and 4 months for improvements to the Centennial Building. Contracting for police services is a long -term commitment and promises six - figure savings for Mound on a long -term consistent basis. -1098- printed on racyclao paper Maintenance to what are aging buildings will always be a factor and must be planned for in the continuum. Staff continues to encourage that the move to contracted policing was a good one and that money spent to facilitate the decision was done with frugality just enough to make these spaces function in their new purpose, without excess or frills. Staff would be pleased to assist in any discussion. 1099- y t a C 3 O `o Y a d a N E E @ m v L N p 0 @ C O 'O @ L M O O U N N C @Y c 00 o m a c p N @ a n � N m c c @ > p @ c w � O d � m E o - U c @ O t N V U � N p c c o> o Q N O w Q 0 0 m � -p a [a m > c � m Z ac O N 0 v 3 N 0 a y _ p L m c E E 0 O O 0 0 N m 0 m 0 E w m c @ E C O O 01 V O O O O O O O C d '0 p 69 f9 IA V V m O O y N N N O Y1 m O �O O M 06 G > p O O OJ M O O N N N p N Y1 F 6 C M M M M V .1i M m (Op O @ O y � 2 LL _U U o. O O O O O O O O N N O O O O O M R O N O O 6 O y V f9 T W v1 V V p C r r O N Q U N a a 00 00 00 00 00 0. M U O V t0 O O O O O O O @ C OJ N d N M C � O) C N t N N U N O Z O _pi O C O pj '00 O. O1 U ¢ U p N N M Z CpO c o ° Z Z Z o� 0° o v n C c m c -p W M c6 y w w `o_ c `o m O M c m m m d c co E O c L c c c @ co n aNi c m U c >@ U U S d < V1 U N U m Y 0 N U Q < nr m N w U U N U N N Z_ W U N O O a U U < O a LLI Q fL } N W O Z Z Lu Z F O A z Z g m Z z O Z OU p < z ti 4 a o O CLJ 0 N g O a O < ~ z > ¢ w z z0 � = U m m 2 x 0 s U a 0 W� M iron- 2 a d a N E E @ m v L N p 0 @ C O 'O @ L M O O U N N C @Y c 00 o m a c p N @ a n � N m c c @ > p @ c w � O d � m E o - U c @ O t N V U � N p c c o> o Q N O w Q 0 0 m � -p a [a m > c � m Z ac O N 0 v 3 N 0 a y _ p L m c E E 0 O O 0 0 N m 0 m 0 E w m c @ E +qte 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX :(952)472 -0620 WEB. www.cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Manager RE: Distribution of Council Packets On Apr 15, 2014, Supervisors representing the City of Mound presented their Annual Reports to the members of the Mound City Council. At this annual event, Supervisors place emphasis on what are the challenges facing their departments and forecast budgetary needs. As a part of those discussions, the topic of expediting the receipt of City Council Packets was touched upon. To maximize the time for the study of packet content, City Staff has been directed to prepare packets in time for distribution on Thursday in a week that precedes a council meeting. The only exception to that would be in the instance of mechanical difficulties with the copier, which can occur. Under the current approach, there are seven business days in which to research and /or prepare, in a week without holidays or other interruptions and /or absences. With less days, here are some examples of change: • Certain claims and topics have to be delayed until the next meeting. This means more manual checks to meet invoice deadlines in order to avoid late fees and delays for certain issues. 0 An early packet deadline adds to the last minute handouts. In this scenario, the public will not get all the information to be discussed. Council Members are invited to discuss and consider any further changes to process. -1101- ' prated on recyoled paper MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Managel�.�4 RE: Ground Breakings & Ribbon Cuttings 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (552) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB: www.cityotmound.corn At a recent meeting with the City Manager and the City Council, City involvement in ground breakings and ribbon cuttings was among topics discussed. The directive `celebrate Mound' was loud and clear from early on and Staff has made it a point to seize opportunities to draw positive attention to Mound in a variety of ways. Two of those methods to celebrate have been ground breakings and ribbon cuttings. Ground breakings go back to 2002, when the City purchased the old post office, demolished it and started construction on the Greenway and Pier. Since then there have been ground breakings on public and private projects, which have included Mound MarketPlace and more recently Dakota Junction. Ribbon cuttings and other dedication ceremonies took place over the years, as we celebrated the opening of Harbor Wine & Spirits, the Public Safety Building and more recently, the Centennial Building. With the lack of public projects in the recession years, the emphasis turned to ribbon cutting events for businesses expanding in Mound or newly locating here. As part of the Centennial Celebration, we also publicly dedicated and cut the ribbon for the renamed Surfside Beach and Park. Each of these events over the years put a positive spotlight on Mound, with the goal being to overcome the prevailing negative image of Mound. In spite of the efforts of City and School to overcome the old image, the perception of Mound, in my experience and from comments that I take, continues to lag. It is Staff's opinion that any reason to celebrate puts Mound in the spotlight and continues to build a positive image for our community. Staff encourages the discussion around these topics and up -to -date Staff direction as to the wishes of the City Council. -1102- printed on recycled paper PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www.cityofmound.com MEMORANDUM DATE: May 22, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus and Council Members Cs FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mana`gV1 f J RE: Remembrance for former Senator Steve Smith Since the recent passing of former Senator Steve Smith, a few individuals have mentioned the appropriateness of remembering him in some way. An affiliate of Steve's with the Hennepin District Courts recommended memorializing a park bench at the Mound Greenway with a bronze plate. While holding office as Minnesota State Senator, Steve Smith did many good things worthy of recognition by the City of Mound. In my experience, he assisted in overturnng a DNR decision that would have otherwise impeded development in the downtown as we know it today. Fire Chief Greg Pederson can cite several examples of how Steve benefited fire departments and Mound Fire Department, in particular. These are just two examples of many. You are invited to discuss and decide what may be appropriate. -1103 - printeJ on recycletl paper City of Mound BMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 12/31/13 ;t.Project„ ;., Hourss # ;-, r$Billed ,, „d',Fund "; Fund /FUntling Source;` Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision 326.50 29,401.50 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners Mound /MCES Projects ,Review /Coordination 44.50 5,600.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts- Billed to property owners /agencies Mound /Development Reviews 29.50 3,723.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners Sewer Fees 400.50 38,724.50 76,106.40 Mound /General Engineering 254.00 21,227.50 101 General Fund/Taxes Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1 /4) 2.88 336.00 101 Streets (1 /4)/Taxes Mound /GIS Updates 1.00 95.00 101 Streets/Taxes 602 257.88 21,658.50 2.88 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 961.50 95,397.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /SW Island Area 103.00 9,642.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 59.50 5,741.00 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 7,704.50 710,071.51 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Island View Drive Reconstruction 11.00 1,049.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall 992.50 97,420.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 9,832.00 919,322.51 10.00 Mound /MSA System Update 65.50 9,215.00 402 Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds) Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project 82.50 9,294.00 427 MSA Funds /General Funds Storm Water Fees 148.00 18,509.00 336.00 Mound /Watermain Loop Island View 15.50 1,337.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 95.50 8,943.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 2.88 336.00 601 Water Fees (1/4) Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery 0.50 71.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Water System Modeling 103.00 10,744.08 601 Water Fees Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 2.00 284.00 601 Water Fees Mound /GIS Updates 6.50 583.33 601 Water Fees 225.88 22,298.41 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 47.00 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 43.50 4,173.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 10.50 966.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction 46.00 4,941.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement 609.00 76,106.40 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement 33.50 4,009.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /I & I Analysis Report 18.00 2,250.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 2.88 33600 602 Sewer Fees (1 /4) Mound /GIS Updates 7.00 583.33 602 Sewer Fees Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges 3.50 480.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 299.00 32,253.50 602 Sewer Fees 1,072.88 126,098.23 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements 10.00 1,392.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /WCA Administration 18.00 1,606.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 2.88 336.00 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 7.00 583.34 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /SWPPP Update 18.00 1,734.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2012 Drainage Improvement Project 11.00 1,562.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Surface Water Management 190.00 22,349.38 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements 206.00 21,804.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 47.00 5,815.50 675 Storm Water Fees 509.88 57,184.22 12/31/13 YTD Total 12,447.00 1,203,795.37 -1104- 2013 YTD through 4th Quarter -1105- 12,447.00 1,203, 795.37 BIIIWBSI Project Hours $ Billed C12.037921 Mound /General Engineering 254.00 21,227.50 C12.037929 Mound /WCA Administration 18.00 1,606.50 C12.038004 Mound /Water System Modeling 103.00! 10,744.08 C12.038077 Mound /I & I Analysis & 2011 CIPP Project 18.00 2,250.00 C12.038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps 11.50 1,344.00 C12.038388 Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery 0.501 71.00 C12.038996 Mound /Development Reviews 29.50, 3,723.00 C12.039286 Mound /SWPPP Update 18.00' 1,734.50 C12.039425 Mound /MSA System Coordination 65.50' 9,215.00 C12.040166 'Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 2.00' 284.00 C12.040420 Mound /Island View Drive Reconstruction 11.00' 1,049.50 C12.100590 'Mound /GIS Updates 21.50' 1,845.00 C12.100601 Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges 3.50' 480.00 C12.101482 (Mound /SW Island Area 103.00,, 9,642.50 C12. 101514 Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 59.50! 5,741.00 C12.101909 Mound /Surface Water Management 190.00 22,349.38 C12.102014 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 43.501 4,173.00 C12.103114 Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 10.501 966.00 C12.103254 'Mound /Watermain Loop Island View 15.50 1,337.00 C12.103438 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements 10.00 1,392.50 C12.103970 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 961.50( 95,397.50 C12.104174 Mound /2012 Storm Drainage Improvements 11.001 1,562.00 C12.104413 'Mound /2012 Lift Station Improvement 46.00, 4,941.00 C12.105545 Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 7,704.50; 710,071.51 C12.105673 Mound /2012 VICES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 299.00! 32,253.50 C12.105883 Mound /Woodlyn Ridge Subdivision 326.50 29,401.50 C12.105944 'Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvment 609.00 76,106.40 C12.105964 Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements 206.001 21,804.50 C12.106416 iMound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination 44.50'1 5,600.00 C12.106810 , Mound /2013 Crack Seal and Seal Coat 82.50 9,294.00 C12.106985 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 47.001: 5,815.50 C12.107130 Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining W 992.501 97,420.50 C12.107414 Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvment 33.50' 4,009.00 C12.107415 Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 95.50' 8,943.00 2013 YTD through 4th Quarter -1105- 12,447.00 1,203, 795.37 1 3 * City of Mound Ms Kandis Hanson 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 -1668 e MoundIGIS U da Services from November 9, 2013 through December 20, 2013: Professional Services Hours Technician Mackey, Caleb Meyers, Nick Totals Total Labor .l December 31, 2013 Project No: C12.100590 Invoice No: 0163101 Rate 19.00 85.00 1.50 90.00 20.50 Amount 1,615.00 135.00 1,750.00 Total this Invoice Notice: A finance charge of' '5% per month lannuat percentage of 18°/ I is charged on balances 30 days or over. -1106 - Notice: A finance charge of L5 % per Man December percentage of 18 °f 1 is charged 00 balances 30 days or over. 1,750.00 $1,750.00 City of Mound BMI Engineering Hours YTD as of 03/31/14 Project : Hours $ Billed Fund -: .:-Fund /Funding Source Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination 0.50 71.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners /agencies Mound /Development Reviews 4.00 576.00 Escrows Escrow Accounts - Billed to property owners 4.50 647.00 Mound /General Engineering 67.00 5,674.78 101 General Fund/Taxes Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (114) 1.63 172.50 101 Streets (1 /4)/Taxes Mound /GIS Updates 1.00 88.00 101 Streets/Taxes 69.63 5,935.28 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 68.50 7,944.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Street Light Replacement 0.00 0.00 401 Federal Grants /City Match /MSA Mound /SW Island Area 11.00 1,067.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 1.00 90.00 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 348.50 34,145.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /Manchester Site & Lynwood Site 0.00 0.00 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining Wall 1,359.50 134,811.50 401 Capital Projects Fund /Bonding 1,788.50 178,059.00 Mound /MSA System Update 10.50 1,505.00 402 Municipal State Aid for Streets (MSA Funds) Mound /2013 Crack Seal Coat Project 0.00 0.00 427 MSA Funds /General Funds 10.50 1,505.00 Mound /Watermain Loop Island View 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 172.00 17,897.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Water System Modeling 21.50 2,382.65 601 Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 1.63 172.50 601 Water Fees (1/4) Mound /Water Supply Emergency Consery 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees Mound /Wellhead Protection Plan 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees Mound /GIS Updates 0.00 0.00 601 Water Fees 195.13 20,452.15 Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.50 245.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.50 245.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 Lift Station Reconstruction 1.00 98.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvement 28.00 2,875.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvement 111.50 12,664.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /I & I Analysis Report 0.00 0.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 1.63 172.50 602 Sewer Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 0.00 0.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /MCES Flows /City Charges 0.00 0.00 602 Sewer Fees Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 55.50 5,459.50 602 Sewer Fees 202.63 21,759.00 Mound /2011 Storm Drainage Improvements 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /WCA Administration 1.50 160.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /SWPPP Update 6.50 740.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps (1/4) 1.63 172.50 675 Storm Water Fees (1/4) Mound /GIS Updates 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2012 Drainage Improvement Project 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /Surface Water Management 20.50 2,843.50 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2013 Storm Drainage Improvements 0.00 0.00 675 Storm Water Fees Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 11.50 1,594.00 675 Storm Water Fees 41.63 5,510.00 03/31/14 YTD Total 2,312.50 233,867.43 -1107- BiIIWBS1 I Project Hours $ Billed C12.037921 Mound /General Engineering 67.00 5,674.78 C12.037929 Mound /WCA Administration 1.50' 160.00 C12.038004 Mound /Water System Modeling 21.50: 2,382.65 C12. 038243 Mound /Update Street & Utility Maps 6.501 690.00 C12.038996 Mound /Development Reviews 4.00' 576.00 C12.039286 Mound /SWPPP Update 6.50' 740.00 C12. 039425 ,Mound _ /MSASystem Coordination 10.50] 1,505.00 C12.100590 Mound /GIS Updates 1.00, 88.00 C12.101482 Mound /SW Island Area 11.001 1,067.50 C12.101514 Mound /Ridgewood /ldlewood /Highland 1.00' 90.00 C12.101909 Mound /Surface Water Management 20.501 2,843.50 C12.102014 !Mound /2010 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.501' 245.00 C12.103114 Mound /2011 Lift Station Reconstruction 2.50' 245.00 C12.103970 Mound /2012 Street /Utility /Retaining Wall 68.50 7,944.50 C12.104413 Mound /2012 Lift Station Improvement 1.00' 98.00 C12.105545 Mound /2013 Street, Utility Improvements 348.50' 34,145.50 C12.105673 Mound /2012 MCES Grant Program 1/1 Reduct 55.50 5,459.50 C12.105944 Mound /2013 Lift Station Improvment 28.00 2,875.00 C12.106416' Mound /MCES Projects, Review /Coordination 0.501 71.00 C12.106985 Mound /2014 Storm Drainage Improvements 11.50 1,594.00 C12.107130 Mound /2014 Street, Utility & Retaining W 1,359.50' 134,811.50 C12.107414 Mound /2014 Lift Station Improvment 111.50', 12,664.00 C12.107415 Mound /Bartlett Blvd Watermain Replace 172.00, 17,897.00 2014 YTD through 1st Quarter -1108- 21312.50 $ 233,867.43 O Z 0 a oW z� o� 0 w m ° W g o p � N 0; U ? a U V) Q N !O M N N (O h Q (O N f0 h 0 f M Q INN — M N N Nr vim v (D V N O p M N O N N h N N h M h M O � h M h W 01 (A O (p tp M (D W � h W Q N (p M O> N Itl N Q N !O M Q (p Q (p v O O O (p N z N W 7 O N O O (O N W N rp OJ Q N f0 � W 1� h N h N O N Q h O T � N N W m tp 1@ (° (p M v W O N t0 M V N P IN Q OJ m M tD M N h ^ M - 0] LL'1 N tD v O m fO h N N P N N INN-- � ^ M VI- 2-8 O_ y O C d N @ 6 CQ d _O QUiQ Q]QQQ � @ M C N D 2 N N ON N N2 y c Ci p E c c c c i c c d O zl liN " EZ oo'o '0000 �c�o"��g "Od > e na`°. nnnn2wxa o'� >jin m3 °c' dLLx'�_EWFEEE EEEE��F@- AUON'?� 0`o O 4 O H O O C7 O O C7 C7 O O O O O O O 0: 1109- m U J y= - N 01 O N P Q (O (O N h h M M M M @ (p uJ � N � N M h O VJ N M N fp O N O h O M M m m M N N 1(] �V M M W N � N y � T C N C W 02 i° ° o 202 J a tN LL Z N J O d d 2i U FW33a t- N m O m W Z N V V (O V N N M N N d M O O 0 M F W M W Z Z W w a aW d 'O m O O O) @ C d U d a Q i O Z N a W o z m N 0 w J G(9 N d O O yma U W N 2 W a w W W O M N N V N N M O N of O -: tN 6 N N N V M O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 N O N N N N W NON O M r M �fJ O r N N M V OM OJrMVOmrNNOJ (OMrMN (O O V Oro 0 � V r N r Yl N M N M N M N O N C4 C O (p V tp f0 N M 07 M N c0 Co O r r N O ro N N M N co ID mcy;rN of t U V N - V N NMN m Co m O 'If N •- N tO M M r O M O r O o o O N o N w N o o v M 0 o MOOOO a in v� o rm r O tN O M (O N M W N M V M t0 M W �O (O (O N Or NM N N 06 L6 tONN O r of (O W N N O [D (O M fN0 M M m V V M O N E Ih N V W Mcn tfJ V tp (D M N N V' V O] N IfJ YJ N N r r M r O O N N M O r r N N h N O O t0 M �O N N N M W W V V N O (O (O V O N r V O N V M M fD N O O_ t0 N M M r N N M V t0 N V v r v N N Mrs " ON V tprN M O] N M n R (p f0 N M N N r N D N M r r ID N 1� N O r N [O M N 0 0 0 @ @ @@ @0 0 0 0 0 0 r O ( C c c c c O M O M r 0 O 0 O ( M m O r V-t0 O .JNO V t0 N O O N O W N N M r N v V N M N OMJ " W NOOMNr V �- O r O a, M 6 r N N N (V N (V ¢ r N N �O r t") w N O � o N W M t0 of ID f0 O �- �o M r co W g N N c 0 M F W M W Z Z W w a aW d 'O m O O O) @ C d U d a Q i O Z N a W o z m N 0 w J G(9 N d O O yma U W N 2 W a w W W O M N N V N N M O N of O -: tN 6 N N N V M O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 N O N N N N W NON O M r M �fJ O r N N M V OM OJrMVOmrNNOJ (OMrMN (O O V Oro 0 � V r N r Yl N M N M N M N O N C4 C O (p V tp f0 N M 07 M N c0 Co O r r N O ro N N M N co ID mcy;rN of t U V N - V N NMN m Co m O 'If N •- N tO M M r O M O r O o o O N o N w N o o v M 0 o MOOOO a in v� o rm r O tN O M (O N M W N M V M t0 M W �O (O (O N Or NM N N 06 L6 tONN O r of (O W N N O [D (O M fN0 M M m V V M O N E Ih N V W Mcn tfJ V tp (D M N N V' V O] N IfJ YJ N N r r M r O O N N M O r r N N h N O O t0 M �O N N N M W W V V N O (O (O V O N r V O N V M M fD N O O_ t0 N M M r N N M V t0 N V v r v N N Mrs " ON V tprN M O] N M n R (p f0 N M N N r N D N M r r ID N 1� N O r N [O M N 0 0 0 @ @ @@ @0 0 0 0 0 0 r O ( C c c c c O M O M r 0 O 0 O ( M m O r V-t0 O .JNO Y N @ C N U oc y o z w m m 'S dod > v a wa. �n a U U m J C O a c N N S E N G@ @ C= G ¢ E v @ 0 0 � � c m a@'i c@ �` o'o E @ z0a.of- Fu i7L �U�U-1110- w O M O fD r N N M N N K N ON r to V NMN L[l V Nro coro our co N M W Y V c0 M V N (O O r (O N O CO N r O (O V M - N U N C 5 @ N C O � '.0 o Z L u o = O a z LL N- N U O N M v o 0 =QOF -U'� 0 O V t0 N O O N O W N N M r N v N N M N OMJ " V N uMi VO' r N M r N �O r t") w N O � o N W M t0 of ID f0 O �- �o Y N @ C N U oc y o z w m m 'S dod > v a wa. �n a U U m J C O a c N N S E N G@ @ C= G ¢ E v @ 0 0 � � c m a@'i c@ �` o'o E @ z0a.of- Fu i7L �U�U-1110- w O M O fD r N N M N N K N ON r to V NMN L[l V Nro coro our co N M W Y V c0 M V N (O O r (O N O CO N r O (O V M - N U N C 5 @ N C O � '.0 o Z L u o = O a z LL N- N U O N M v o 0 =QOF -U'� 0 O ED May 15, 2014 10TU iM] Kandis Hanson, City Manager City Of Mound 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 -1687 Dear City Manager Hanson: Each year, the Metropolitan Council prepares population and household estimates as of April I of the previous year. Local governments are invited to review and comment on the preliminary estimates. The Council will certify final estimates by July 15 for state government use in allocating local government aid and street aid. Council staff recently discovered that a manufactured housing park located partly in the City Of Mound closed before April 1, 2013 but was inadvertently included in the preliminary estimates for 2013. As a result, the report sent to you last week slightly overestimated the number of housing units, households, and persons in your community. This letter communicates the Council's revised estimate, which replaces the previous version. We apologize for the inconvenience. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City Of Mound had 9,421 people and 4,045 households as of April 1, 2013. Household size averaged 2.33 persons per household. As described before, the Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing stock, occupancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources include housing stock, manufactured home parks, and group quarters data maintained by Metropolitan Council Research, as well as U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey data. For more information on the Council's population estimates model, please visit the Council's website at http: / /stats,metc. state. mn.us /stats /aboutestimates.aspx or contact Matt Schroeder at 651- 602 -1513. Council staff welcomes discussion of the 2013 preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or specific objections, in writing, by June 24. Please send any written comments or questions to Matt Schroeder, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 North Robert Street, Saint Paul, MN 55 10 1; or by e -mail to matt.schroeder @mete.state.mn.us Sincerely, a Matt Schroeder Senior Researcher w .u_1111- uncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 - Fax (651) 602 -1550 o TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Egua( Opportunity Employer 2013 Annual Population Estimates Mound city, Hennepin County, Minnesota Households: 4,045 Population in Households: 9,416 Average Household Size: Housing Total: 4,376 Population in Group Quarters: 5 Occupancy Rate: 92.44% Total Population: 9,421 03.1:3 Metropolitan Council's Annual Estimates account for housing stock changes since April 1, 2010. These include housing units permitted and other changes. Other changes are due to demolitions, building conversions (units added or lost), city boundary changes (units annexed in or out), and other changes reported by city and township staff. The Council assumes that 85% of multifamily and 95% of single - family units permitted in 2012 were completed and occupiable by April 1, 2013; the remainder are occupiable in the future. Manufactured homes are counted each yearfrom Metropolitan Council surveys of manufactured home park operators and local governments. Other housing (boats, RVs, etc. used as housing) is an estimate from the most recent Census ACS estimates. Housing Stock April 1, 2010 Single- family- detached: 3,273 Townhomes: 253 Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units: 103 Multifamily units: 737 Manufactured homes: 13 Other (boats, RVs, etc. as shelter): 0 Housing Total: 4,379 Permitted and Other changes Housing Stock built since 2010 since 2010 April 1, 2013 10 -13 3,270 0 0 253 0 0 103 0 0 737 Single- family- detached: 0 92.38% 3,021 0 4,376 Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate and average household size. Starting with the 2011 -12 cycle, the primary data are the most recent American Community Survey estimates, calculated and adjusted as described in the Council's methodology, available online at http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/stats/aboutestimates.aspx Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit. The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent. Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) is counted separately through an annual Metropolitan Council survey. Housing Stock Occupancy Occupied with Persons Per Population in April 1, 2013 Rate 2013 Households Household 2013 Single- family- detached: 3,270 92.38% 3,021 2.496 7,540 Townhomes: 253 92.38% 234 2.496 584 Duplex, 3 -, 4 -plex units: 103 99.50% 102 3.412 348 Multifamily units: 737 93.38% 688 1.373 944 Manufactured homes: 0 0.00% 0 5.040 0 Other: 0 Counted only if 0 1,800 0 occupied Housing Total: 4,376 Households: 4,045 In Households: 9,416 In Group Qtrs: 5 Total Population: 9,421 Metropolitan Council -1112- 5/15/2014 I Appropriate Country Club attire and soft spikes are required. Rain or Shine Tournament Prevention 2014 H&TONK4 R, e, OPEY SBM Crime Attn: i. Check Mailing Address Email Mailing Address Email Mailing Address Email " Mailing Address Email appropriate box: Enclosed is my team Fee of $560.00. Team Name I will sponsor ____Hotels) @ $150 per Hole. I will help Sponsor the Lunch andfor Dinner. Please Call I will donate Raffle item(s) worth $30 or more. I will donate Silent Auction Item(s) worth $50 or more. 1 am unable to attend. Please accept my donation of $ PROCEEDS BENEFIT DRUG & CRIME PREVENTION PROGRAMS SBM Crime Prevention Fund is a 501(c)3 Organization For mom tr$ - -tion contact