Loading...
2014-06-24 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 24, 2014 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Open meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 1198 -1217 *B. Approve minutes: June 10, 2014 regular meeting 1218 -1224 *C. Approve Resolution Awarding Contract for the Bartlett Boulevard 1225 -1226 Watermain Improvements to Widmer Construction, LLC, in the amount of $645,759.50, City Project No. PW -14 -08 *D. Approve Resolution Appointing Absentee Ballot Board 1227 *E. Approve Resolution Approving Variance and Expansion Permit at 4861 1228 -1255 Shoreline Drive Planning Case No. 14 -10 and Planning Case No. 14 -11 PID No. 13-117-24-44-0018 *F. Approve Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for 2308 Driftwood Lane 1256 -1273 Planning Case No. 14 -03 PID No. 13- 117 -24 -44 -0056 *G. Approve Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for 1733 Bluebird Lane 1274 -1307 Planning Case No. 14 -07 PID No. 13-117-24-24-0023 *H. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for 5030 Bartlett Boulevard 1308 -1337 Planning Case No. 14 -09 PID No.24- 117 -24 -12 -0046 *I. Approve Resolution Approving Minnesota Laws 2014, Chapter 308, Article 6, 1338 -1341 Section 10 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. *J. Approve Resolution Authorizing Execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement 1342 -1353 Between the City of Mound and Hennepin County for Participation in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program in FY 2015 -1017 *K. Approve Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of a Sewer Vac Truck for 1354 -1359 Public Works *L. Approve Resolution Authorizing a Liquor Store Lighting Retrofit Project 1360 -1362 Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker) Tim Litfin, representing Tour de Tonka as it passes through Mound Aug 2, 2014 Kandis Hanson, City Manager, with update on sewer bypass event of 1363 -1387 May 31 -June 1, 2014 8. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: C. Reports: D. Correspondence: Letter of resignation by CSO Mike Wocken: June 11, 2014 1388 Memo re Potential Election Judges: June 16, 2014 1389 Letter Regarding Public Demonstration of Voting 1390 -1391 Equipment June 17, 2014 9. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas maybe viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: wit w. e rcnm. 2014 061314CTYMAN $ 339.81 2014 062414CITY $ 866,484.47 2014 062414HWS $ 104,836.68 TOTAL CLAIMS 1198- CITY OF MOUND 06/19/1410:46 AM !J' _ -- ---�,\ Page 1 Payments ` CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 FM IT Batch Name 0514BOLTMNK User Dollar Amt $63,564.50 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $63,564.50 $0.00 In Balance Refer 5 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA - Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs MSA SYSTEM UPDATE SVCS THRU MAY 9 $580.00 2014 Invoice 0166926 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -300 Professional Srvs SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU MAY 9 $72.50 2014 Invoice 0166929 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43112 -300 Professional Srvs 2012 NORTH ISLAND STREET PROJ. PIN 12- $415.50 01 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166930 5/31/2014 Project PW1201 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs UPDATE STREET & UTILITY MAPS $3,702.50 ENGINEERING THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166923 5/31/2014 Project 14-4 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MAY 9 $445.00 2014 Invoice 0166921 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs SANITARY SEWER ENGINEERING SVCS $55.00 THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166921 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -300 Professional Srvs DOCK ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MAY 9 $120.00 2014 Invoice 0166921 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -303 Engineering Fees 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- $9,288.00 01 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166931 5/31/2014 Project PW1301 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- $415.50 03 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166934 5/31/2014 Project PW1303 Cash Payment E 401 - 43213 -303 Engineering Fees 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- $72.50 05 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166933 5/31/2014 Project PW1305 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- $580.00 06 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166932 5/31/2014 Project PW1306 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -300 Professional Srvs WATER SYSTEM MODELING ENG SVCS $367.50 THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166922 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE $146.50 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166925 5/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C 2201 CENTERVIEW LN DEVELOPMENT $72.50 REVIEW -ENG SVC THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166924 5131/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23305 4861 SHORELINE #14 -10 & 4861 SHORELINE BLVD DEVELOP REVIEW- $72.50 ENG SVC THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166924 5/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23297 JESBERG -1728 FINCH LN -P 1728 FINCH LN DEVELOPMENT REVIEW- $72.50 ENG SVC THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166924 5/31/2014 -1199- CITY OF MOUND • 1J• ►C Payments Current Period: June 2014 06/19/14 10:46 AM Page 2 Cash Payment E 401 - 43114 -303 Engineering Fees 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW14- $32.50 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW14- $31,270.50 01 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 $45,501.50 Invoice 0166921 5/31/2014 Project PW1401 $632.00 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,510.50 Refer 6 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs MCES FLOWS- PROJECTS, $72.50 REPLACE PROJ PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU REVIEW /COORDINATION THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166935 5/31/2014 2014 RETAINING WALL 3 PTS BLVD $4,422.50 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -300 Professional Srvs WATER WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN $72.50 ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166927 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0166928 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43114 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0166937 5/31./2014 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166936 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166938 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 60149400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0166939 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43110 -303 Engineering Fees GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU MAY 9 2014 $2,912.00 Project 14-4 $662.50 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW14- $31,270.50 01 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 $45,501.50 Project PW1401 $580.00 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ $632.00 PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 9 2014 $13,870.50 Project PW 1404 $851.00 2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 $6,133.00 ENG SVC THRU MAY 9 2014 Project PW1403 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN $1,539.00 REPLACE PROJ PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU MAY 9 2014 Project PW1408 2014 RETAINING WALL 3 PTS BLVD $4,422.50 REPLACEMENT PROJ PW 14 -02 ENG SVC THRU MAY 9 2014 Invoice 0166940 5131/2014 Project PW1402 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47,054.00 Fund Summary Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $63,564.50 Total $63,564.50 -1200- 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $662.50 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $120.00 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $45,501.50 402 MUNICIPAL STAID ST CONSTUCT $580.00 601 WATER FUND $1,979.00 602 SEWER FUND $13,870.50 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $851.00 $63,564.50 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $63,564.50 Total $63,564.50 -1200- CITY OF MOUND 06/13/148:45 AM Page 1 Payments - -- &ITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 ':was '3.`�!�'�. °. u31dw"�v43tF „tY`'ik'�„'� m,arn.au a, S� �P� ire, a; =�,,. ..,..w ., ,. ,. ,w w,, .,� „•L Batch Name 061314CTYMAN User DollarAmt $339.81 Payments Computer DollarAmt $339.81 Refer 1 RIEDER MEAT MARKET Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 06132014 6/12/2014 PO 24360 Transaction Date 6/13/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND $0.00 In Balance EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCH 6 -19 -14 $339.81 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $339.81 10100 Wells Fargo $339.81 $339.81 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $339.81 Total $339.81 -1201- CITY OF MOUND 06/19/1411:11 AM Page 1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 Batch Name 062414CITY User Dollar Amt $866,484.47 150 YARDS SOD -CITY HALL, FIRE DEPT, $112.50 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $866,484.47 STREETSCAPE $0.00 In Balance Invoice 4871 Refer 1 3D SPECIALTIES Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms YELLOW UNIFORM T SHIRTS $335.68 Invoice 445381 5/27/2014 Project 14-5 3 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY Transaction Date 6/1 612 01 4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ....... . ..... . $335.68 Refer . 41 ABDO EICK AND MEYERS, LLP REPLACEMENT LENS COVER FOR LIGHT AT Cash Payment E 101-41500-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $1,022.57 WATERBURY LIFT STATION- VANDALISM 31-2013 Invoice 27675 Invoice 329768 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 222-42260-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $541.35 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/3012014 Cash Payment E 281-45210-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $180.45 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 401-43101-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $225.56 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 601-49400-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $473.68 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/3012014 Cash Payment E 602-49450-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $473.68 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $842.11 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 670-49500-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $120.30 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 675-49425-301 Auditing and Acct g Servi CERTIFIED AUDIT SVCS- YEAR ENDED 12- $120,30 31-2013 Invoice 329768 5/30/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ... .... $4,000,00 Refer .... 2 ACE SOD FARMS Cash Payment E 101-41930-400 Repairs & Maintenance 150 YARDS SOD-CITY HALL, FIRE DEPT, $56.25 STREETSCAPE Invoice 4871 5/22/2014 Cash Payment E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance • 150 YARDS SOD-CITY HALL, FIRE DEPT, $56.25 STREETSCAPE Invoice 4871 5/22/2014 Cash Payment E 101-43100-232 Landscape Material 150 YARDS SOD -CITY HALL, FIRE DEPT, $112.50 STREETSCAPE Invoice 4871 5/22/2014 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $225.00 Refer 3 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY Cash Payment E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maintenance REPLACEMENT LENS COVER FOR LIGHT AT $230.45 WATERBURY LIFT STATION- VANDALISM Invoice 27675 5/23/2014 -1202- CITY OF MOUND Payments C1�111'y OM MOUND 06/19/14 11:11 AM Page 2 Current Period: June 2014 Transaction Date 5/2212014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.45 Refer _ 4 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies WATER LEASE JUNE, JULY, AUG 2014 Invoice 1177464 6/7/2014 ..... .... - Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies - COFFEE & CREAMER- FIRE DEPT Invoice 1178633 6111/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 5 BUNN, BEN Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 2014 BOOT ALLOWANCE REIMB BL BUNN Invoice 06242014 6/10/2014 $0.40 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 ,w ___1­111 .... Wells Fargo 10100 1 11 1 ... ._..,.. -,. ..w., Im _, -.., .,.._ ,-- - -,., . .. Refer 34 CAD ZONE, INCORPORATED _ ..... .... - Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft FIRE EASY PLAN SOFTWARE Invoice 30465 6/10/2014 $122.72 Transaction Date 6117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 6 CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ $354.53 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair MOTOR OIL, OIL FILTER, Invoice 6974 - 226235 5/16/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair FUEL FILTER, VALVE CORE Invoice 6974 - 226279 5117/2014 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 7 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/V19 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair / Maint Supply AMSOIL PREMIX Invoice 6974 - 225898 511312014 $72.00 $59.00 $131.00 $139.98 Total $139.98 $309.00 Total $309.00 $111.25 $19.60 Total $130.85 $73.14 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair / Maint Supply CAPSULE- STANDARD'07 DODGE DAKOTA $10.77 #407 Invoice 6974 - 226435 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply Invoice 6974 - 227138 5/29/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 6974 - 227143 5/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair / Maint Supply Invoice 6974 - 227149 5/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -101 F T Empl Regular Invoice 6974 - 226996 5/28/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply Invoice 6974 - 226996 5/2812014 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Refer 8 GEMSTONE PRODUCTS COMPAN FUSE- SEWER TRUCK $0.40 PERMAPDXY PLASTIC WELD- WATER DEPT $5.79 ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR $18.99 AMSOIL PREMIX $122.72 AIR, FUEL & OIL FILTERS $122.72 Project 14 -3 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $354.53 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials STREET MTCE MATERIALS, 4000PSI, 3/4 MRWRA, AEA, VMA Invoice 1377457 5119/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials Invoice 1377458 5/19/2014 Transaction Date 5/19/2014 Refer 9 CITY HEIGHTS, INCORPORATED STREET MTCE MATERIALS, 4000PSI, 3/4 MRWRA, AEA, VIVA Wells Fargo -1203- 10100 Total $568.00 $700.00 $1,268.00 CITY OF MOUND 06/19/1411:11 AM _ Payments Page 3 Ilt OF NAOUN Current Period: June 2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -460 Janitorial Services WASH ALL EXTERIOR GLASS- INSIDE AND $302.00 OUT- CITY HALL & FIRE DEPT 6 -10 -14 Invoice 10445 6/6/2014 ' Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -460 Janitorial Services WASH ALL EXTERIOR GLASS- INSIDE AND $302.00 OUT- CITY HALL & FIRE DEPT 6 -10 -14 Invoice 10445 616/2014 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ... $604.00 .. ­1-,1 -­ ­1111111 1-1 11-1 .. -.. „s „ -, — .,- ..,.... .... Refer 10 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. ., .m. .. ....h ....., .,u.,,,, ,., ..... .. ... - .H w ,..,...,� Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials DURA DRIVE HOTMIX 72.39 TONS $3,941.64 Invoice 140531 5/311214 Transaction Date 5/22/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ......�.,.. .,,,.� ... $3,941.64 ..., . -. ... . .. ..... ............... na , . ._ Refer 11 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING ., ..., ....�....�_ ...... _ .......... Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic REMOVE PAVERS, DIG DOWN TO LINE, FILL $759.00 & COMPACT, RE- INSTALL PAVERS Invoice 6155 5121/2014 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $759.00 rc Refer 35 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials MESH STRAINER, GUN CLEANER, RAC 5 $187.12 GUARD Invoice 802152354 5/8/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 ... Wells Fargo 10100 Total $187.12 ., .,._ ........ .. ...... .,,,. Refer 36 DOCK MASTERS OF LAKE MTK_A, I _ Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic RAISE DOCK SECTIONS $469.00 Invoice 202586 6/1412014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies FRAMES & DOCK SECTIONS- 2 5'X 8' $1,350.00 Invoice 202583 6/712014 PO 24358 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL / RAISE DOCK SECTIONS @ $112.00 SURFSIDE PARK Invoice 202583 6/7/2014 PO 24358 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,931.00 ,. ­1111111 11 1 1111111111.1­11 Refer 12 G & K SERVICES 1 _., _ - - "I'll", Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -2 -14 $25.21 Invoice 1006335245 6/2/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -2 -14 $25.65 Invoice 1006335245 6/2/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -2 -14 $36.84 Invoice 1006335245 612/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 6 -2 -14 $139.51 Invoice 1006335245 6/2/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $227.21 Refer 13 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -09 -14 PARKS $55.02 Invoice 1006346468 6/912014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 6 -09 -14 PARKS $82.51 Invoice 1006346468 619/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 6 -16 -14 LIQUOR STORE $76.97 Invoice 1006357865 6/16/2014 -1204- CITY OF MOUND 06119/14 11:11 AM Page 4 Payments -MY OF FAOUND Current Period: June 2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 6-9-14 LIQUOR STORE $76.97 Invoice 1006346462 6/9/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $607.92 Cash Payment E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services MAT SVC 5-12-14 FIRE DEPT $76.77 Invoice 1006301232 5/12/2014 PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $127.20 Transaction Date 6/1612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $368.24 Refer 14 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Project 14-3 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply GPS RECEIVER & BRACKET, SENSUS $607.92 COMAND LINK Invoice C269748 5/16/2014 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $607.92 Refer 15 HENNEPINCOUNTYINFORMATIO Cash Payment E 602-49450-418 Other Rentals PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $127.20 MAY 2014 Invoice 1000046391 6/10/2014 Project 14-3 Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $790.26 ADMINISTRATION FEE - MAY 2014 Invoice 1000046323 611012014 Transaction Date 3/612014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.46 Refer 37 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training FIREFIGHTER I SCHOOL- G. BERTHIAUME, J $1,342.20 BRYCE & D HEILAND Invoice 00242796 6/5/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,342.20 Refer 45 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional S"s MISC PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 $1,523.65 Invoice 007-001-73 6/6/2014 Cash Payment G 101-23296 FRI E DRICHSON-FAIRFIELD 5913 FAIRFIELD RD SUBDV PLANNING SVCS $477.25 MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/612014 Cash Payment G 101-23297 JESBERG-1728 FINCH LN-P 1728 FINCH LANE VARIANCE PLANNING $249.00 SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/612014 Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE SUBDV PLANNING $62,25 SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/6/2014 Cash Payment G 101-23298 BENCHMARK-2308 DRIFTW 2308 DRIFTWOOD EXP PERMIT-MISC $103.75 PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/612014 Cash Payment G 101-23299 PELLETT-6260 BIRCH LN 1 6260 BIRCH LANE VARIANCE-MISC $166.00 PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/6/2014 Cash Payment GIOI-23300KING2201 CENTERVIEW C 2201 CENTERVIEW LN SUBDV-KING -MISC $166.00 PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/612014 Cash Payment G 101-23305 4861 SHORELINE #14-10 & 4861 SHORELINE VARIANCE-JESSBERG- $249.00 MISC PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/612014 Cash Payment G 101 -23302 Lecy 1733 Bluebird PC #14-0 1733 BLUEBIRD LN VARIANCE- $249.00 WEISENHORN-MISC PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/612014 -1205- CITY OF MOUND 06/19114 11:11 AM Transaction Date 6116/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Page 5 ILI Payments Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials CBS 1H ASPHALT EMULSION Invoice 70561 5/23/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 UTY OF MOUND Refer 21 MINNETONKA SCHOOL DISTRICT4 Current Period: June 2014 REFUND MUSIC PERMIT FEE FOR TOUR DE Cash Payment G 101-23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT 5030 BARTLE17 VARIANCE-HOPKINS-MISC $103,75 PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/6/2014 Cash Payment G 101-23301 Pert, Pool - 5024 Tuxedo 14- 5024 TUXEDO POOL COVER VARIANCE- $62.25 MISC PLANNING SVCS MAY 2014 Invoice 007-005-69 6/612014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 1— Wells Fargo 10100 Total 1 11 $3,411.90 11 1 1 "1 1 "ll-111111111--_ 1 ­11 ­11111 _1­1 —1-111 1-11,1111, ­11-11­1 1 Refer 16 ISS FACILITY SERVICES MINNEAP 1111-11 "1 .. .. ...... .......... Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic EVERGLAZE 151 SO FT- HWS $322.76 Invoice 744457 5122/2014 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $322.76 Refer 42 LAKE MANAGEMENT, INC. Cash Payment E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maintenan'ce 2 TREATMENTS WEED CONTROL DUTCH $1,165.00 LAKE BOAT ACCESS Invoice 33696 1/22/2014 PC 23701 Cash Payment E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maintenance 2 TREATMENTS WEED CONTROL SEVEN $4,399.00 BEACHES Invoice 33697 1122/2014 PO 23702 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,564.00 ... ...... Refer 17 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC . Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials MISC PARTS- NYLON CABLE TIES, EAR $174.82 PLUGS, HAND CLEANER, SAFETY GLASSES Invoice 9302468688 5/21/2014 Project 14-5 Transaction Date 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $174.82 Refer 18 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $32.85 OVERAGE - 5/14/14 TO 6/13/14 Invoice 1762320 6/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BAN $153.10 OVERAGE - 5/14/14 TO 6/13/14 Invoice 1762320 6/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER $3.05 OVERAGE CHO 5-10-14 TO 6-9-14 Invoice 1761515 6/2/2014 Project 14-3 Transaction Date 2/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $189.00 Refer 19 MEDIACOM Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 3-16-14 THRU 4- $85.90 15-14 Invoice 06242014 616/2014 Transaction Date 6116/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 20 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPA Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials CBS 1H ASPHALT EMULSION Invoice 70561 5/23/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 21 MINNETONKA SCHOOL DISTRICT4 Cash Payment R 101-42000-32172 Public Gathering Perm REFUND MUSIC PERMIT FEE FOR TOUR DE TONKA RE-EVALUATING CODE/FEES $85.90 $393.00 $393.00 $100.00 Invoice 06242014 6/11/2014 Transaction Date 6/1712014 Wells sFa-1206- , 10100 Total $100,00 CITY OF MOUND 06/19/14 11:11 AM $208.97 Page 6 IL Payments POUCHES, TAPE -CITY HALL Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total (Iffy OF MOUKM Refer 24 MULCHSTORE, THE Current Period: June 2014 LAMINATING POUCHES- HWS Refer 22 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO _ CONTRACTOR 50/50 BLEND MULCH- PARKS Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib JUNE 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,250.00 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 06242014 6/1/2014 CONTRACTOR 50/50 BLEND MULCH- DEPOT Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,250.00 Refer 44 MOUND FIRE RELIEFASSOCIATIO _ Cash Payment R 609- 49750 -37817 Promotional Event LIQUOR STORE FISH FRY TICKET SALES- $730.00 73 QTY 1 11 1 11 11 „„ .- _,. Refer 38 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVIC _ Invoice 06242014 6/12/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $730.00 Refer 25 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. _ Invoice 00530989 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts 2 TIRES $254.60 Invoice 960938 6/612014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $254.60 Refer 23 MUELLER, WILLIAMAND SONS Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials PEA ROCK- 12.01 TON $208.97 Invoice 192371 5/19/2014 $146.59 POUCHES, TAPE -CITY HALL Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $208.97 Refer 24 MULCHSTORE, THE $492.78 LAMINATING POUCHES- HWS _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -232 Landscape Material CONTRACTOR 50/50 BLEND MULCH- PARKS $48.00 Invoice 15448 5/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -232 Landscape Material CONTRACTOR 50/50 BLEND MULCH- DEPOT $48.00 Invoice 15448 5/31/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total. _ ....m ... "III $96.00 .., ,.. 1 11 1 11 11 „„ .- _,. Refer 38 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVIC _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies 4L MAXI FOG FLUID $123.96 Invoice 00530989 6/12/2014 Transaction Date 6/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $123.96 Refer 28 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIP - Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic LOT INSTALLATION & ADJUST NEW CLA- $1,750.00 VALS IN BOOSTER STATION Invoice 140124DJ -1 5/29/2014 P024342 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Refer 26 OFFICE DEPOT - -- -_ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 715940382001 6/912014 PO 24399 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 715940382001 6/9/2014 PO 24399 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 715463314001 6/412014 PO 23452 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Refer 46 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS - Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -322 Postage Invoice 140536 6/14/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,750.00 COPY PAPER, PENS, LAMINATING $146.59 POUCHES, TAPE -CITY HALL ASTROBRITE PAPER- P & 1 $10.77 PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES, $492.78 LAMINATING POUCHES- HWS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $650.14 MAY 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $340.43 -1207- CITY OF MOUND Payments UTY OF rAOUND 06/19/14 11:11 AM Page 7 Current Period: June 2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute MAY 2014-CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,761.37 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140536 6/1412014 Project 14-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-307 Admin/Finance/Compute MAY 2014-CIS DATA HOSTING, Wells Fargo 10100 Total 11-- 11 1 1 I'll 11 1 11111­"_"'_""_11 ­"I'll" 11--1 $257.98 11 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 140536 6114/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage MAY 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE Invoice 140536 6/14/2014 E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing Transaction Date 10114/2013 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 39 ORONO, CITY OF $91.20 Cash Payment E 101-42110-440 Other Contractual Servic 2ND INSTALL 2014 YEAR #2 -TRNSFR MOUND POLICE DEPT TO ORONO- 6/17/2014 Wells Fa - 10100 Total -1208- CONTRACTED SVCS Invoice 20140095 6/11/2014 Cash Payment E 101-42110-440 Other Contractual Servic 112 COST OF WHEEL-LOAD SCALE CALIBRATION Invoice 20140077 5/22/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Refer 27 OTTENBROTHERS Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 1364670 6/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 1365353 615/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Refer 43 PEDERSON, GREG Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 06242014 6/1612014 Transaction Date 6117/2014 Refer 50 QUILL.COM Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Wells Fargo 10100 3 SOD ROLLS 1.15 SQ YDS 4 SOD ROLLS 1.15 SO YDS Total $1,761,37 $340.43 $4,203.60 $791,812.50 $325.00 $792,137.50 $17.97 $23.96 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $41.93 REIMS. G. PEDERSON SAM'S CLUB $217.50 MEMBERSHIP, CLEAN SUPPLIES, DRINK CUPS, POSTERS-FED EX OFFICE, WALL HOOK-HANG PICTURE Wells Fargo 10100 Total $217.50 PRINTHEAD HP DESIGNJET INK CARTRIDGES- PUB WKS $257.98 Invoice 3628389 6/11/2014 P024377 Project 14-3 $114.00 Transaction Date 6/19/2014 -11-1 1 1 I 1 1­1 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 11-- 11 1 1 I'll 11 1 11111­"_"'_""_11 ­"I'll" 11--1 $257.98 11 I'll 1 11 11 - "I'll I 1 11 1 11 I'll 111111,1­11- "I'll", 1 11 Refer 28 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER-CITY E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing 11,1111-11-, Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE-5-03-14 $114.00 Invoice 99143 5/312014 E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing CLEANING WATER TOWERS NOTICE -5-24- Cash Payment E 101-45200-351 Legal Notices Publishing OPENINGS- PARKS & OPEN SPACE $91.20 Invoice 105725 COMMISSION 5-03-14 Invoice 99142 5/3/2014 Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE-5-10-14 $114.00 Invoice 101318 5/10/2014 Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing HYDRANT FLUSHING NOTICE-5-17-14 $114.00 Invoice 103425 5/17/2014 Cash Payment E 601-49400-351 Legal Notices Publishing CLEANING WATER TOWERS NOTICE -5-24- $114.00 14 Invoice 105725 5/2412014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fa - 10100 Total -1208- $547.20 CITY OF MOUND 06/1 911 4 11:11 AM Page 8 Payments C-1 t Y OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 Refer 48 TRADEMARK TITLES VCS, INC. _ Cash Payment R 369 - 47000 -36100 Special Assessments REFUND DUPLICATE ASSESSMENT PYMT- $1,344.52 6024 EVERGREEN RD Invoice 06242014 6/17/2014 Transaction Date 611812014 Wells Fargo 10100 - I .- .. . 111­11111 . _ 11 .,, 1 .. , - . ,fl , I 1 ­1 1 I,.., „. , .. _ . , "1 1 1 1 , .,..—.,w,. Refer 29 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair CHAIN SAW SHARPENING Invoice 115145 5/21/2014 Total $1,344.52 $7.50 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies SALT PELLETS FOR WATER SOFTENERS Invoice 115536 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies SALT PELLETS FOR WATER SOFTENERS Invoice 115536 5130/2014 Transaction Date 6117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 30 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PWPKS) Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -220 Repair / Maint Supply HARDWARE- BOOSTER Invoice 114333 5/112014 Total Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials SIDEWALKS 2.5 GAL POLY TANK SPRAYER Invoice 114499 51612014 Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -220 Repair / Maint Supply PARKING DECK - SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS Invoice 114501 5/6/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -224 Street Maint Materials 10 LB HYDRAULIC CEMENT Invoice 114517 5/6/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -322 Postage SHIPPING CHARGE- WATER DEPT Invoice 114569 5/712014 Cash Payment E 670 - 49500 -460 Janitorial Services TAPE, CLOTHESLINE - RECYCLE DAY EVENT Invoice 114662 5/9/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms COWHIDE LEATHER GLOVES- 2 PR- SEWER Invoice 114679 5/912014 Cash Payment E 285- 46388 -210 Operating Supplies LIQUID ANT BAIT - PARKING DECK Invoice 114760 5/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -220 Repair / Maint Supply GALVANIZED NIPPLES & COUPLING Invoice 114809 5/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -220 Repair / Maint Supply FLUORESCENT BULBS- CITY HALL Invoice 114876 5/14/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply PARKS- COPPET TEE, SILLCOCK, GALVANIZED NIPPLES, BALL VALVES, BOILER DRAIN, COPPER UNION Invoice 114958 5116/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 115038 5/19/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 115058 5119/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair / Maint Supply Invoice 115061 5/19/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -220 Repair / Maint Supply Invoice 115091 5/20/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -232 Landscape Material Invoice 115239 5/23/2014 IN /EX LX PRIMER KILZ COIL CHAIN, FG QUICK LK, BREECHING SNPS CABLE TIES SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS - STREETS 100'1/4" PROOF CHAIN- BOVEYS, BENCHES -1209- $69.90 $69.90 $147.30 $24.99 $28.99 $0.60 $18.99 $30.70 $12.27 $4.58 $7.49 $12.36 $18.98 $79.50 $90.99 $48.70 $7.49 $1.60 $17,91 CITY OF MOUND 06119/14 11:11 AM - - -- ~ Page 9 \ Payments Ctrl' OF &P,0Utvr Invoice 27454 Current Period: June 2014 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies TRASH BAGS $17.09 Invoice 115265 5/24/2014 6/5/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -210 Operating Supplies 60 LB CONCRETE MIX $109.80 Invoice 115361 5/27/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials RED MARKING PAINT $6.99 Invoice 115379 5/2712014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms GLOVES- 8 PRS $57.96 Invoice 115447 5/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies DUCT TAPE $9.99 Invoice 115447 5/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply CARPET TAPE $6.99 Invoice 115495 5/30/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $614.96 Refer 31 UHL COMPANY - Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC CALL HEATING SYSTEM- VAV'S NOT $494.00 RUNNING -CITY HALL 6 -5 -14 Invoice 27454 6/9/2014 Transaction Date 411512014 Refer 40 WESTONKA VISION CENTER _ Cash Payment E222-42260-219 Safety supplies Invoice 48784 6/5/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Refer 32 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 414710270 6/3/2014 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Refer 47 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 06242014 6117/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 06242014 6/17/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Refer 49 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 525550422 6113/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $494.00 LENSES FOR SCBA MASK- S. HENKELS $108.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.00 5341 MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS -5 -3 TO $4,951.28 6 -2 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,951.28 GRANDVIEW LIFT STATION PERMITS 2014 UTIL IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 DELTA POLE RELO Project PW 1403 GRANDVIEW LIFT STATION PERMITS 2014 UTIL IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 UG SVC RELO Project PW1403 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27/14 TO 5/27/14 ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27114 TO 5/27/14 DEPOT ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27114 TO 5/27/14 ELECTRIC SVC - 4127/14 TO 5/27114 ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27/14 TO 5/27/14 ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27/14 TO 5/27/14 -1210- $3,866.88 $1,183.00 $5,049.88 $101.31 $41.67 $1,200.48 $1,490.90 $3,111.23 $1,413.77 CITY OF MOUND 06119/14 11:11 AM Page 10 Payments WN OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 GLOVES Cash Payment E 101-41930-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27/14 TO 5/27/14 $1,051 Invoice 525550422 6113/2014 Invoice 29582 613/2014 Project 14-3 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27/14 TO 5/27/14 $1,051.50 Invoice 525550422 611312014 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4127/14 TO 5/27/14 $1,062.56 Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 $649.45 285 MOUND HRA Cash Payment E 285-46388-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27/14 TO 5/27/14 $1,266.34 Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 $225.56 601 WATER FUND Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4/27/14 TO 5/27/14 $41.63 Invoice 525550422 6/13/2014 $3,972.45 670 RECYCLING FUND Transaction Date 6/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .... . $11,832.89 Refer 33 ZACKS, INCORPORATED _ ............... Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts 36" SERRATED MAGNESIUM LUTE BAR $86.97 Invoice 29582 6/3/2014 Project 14-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12 FIR NITRILE COATED PALM NYLON $25.75 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $866,484.47 Total $866,484.47 -1211- GLOVES Invoice 29582 6/3/2014 Project 14-3 Cash Payment E 60249450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 12 FIR COWHIDE DRIVERS GLOVES $107.88 Invoice 29582 613/2014 Project 14-3 Transaction Date 6/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $220.60 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $821,908.59 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $17,508.04 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $649.45 285 MOUND HRA $1T274.43 369 G.O. 2006 -A Improvements $1,344.52 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $225.56 601 WATER FUND $8,727.74 602 SEWER FUND $10,511.02 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $3,972.45 670 RECYCLING FUND $132.57 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $230.10 $866,484.47 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $866,484.47 Total $866,484.47 -1211- CITY OF MOUND 06/19/14 10:41 AM 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa Page 1 Payments Invoice 90308600 CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 Transaction Date e m 1. w,barb.,n.,aa3x��4y: aU.,+,.w,"ia^$:3�1't4}'"" U' kw�w, ;' • "a"!'r ii`Mi+b w.a., .,. raw v.�S ,. k,awamu v;J 1T t, +,,, 1nz i Batch Name 062414HWS User Dollar Amt $104,836.68 Refer 4 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $104,836.68 $0.00 in Balance Cash Payment E Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $258.80 Invoice 385415510 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 385415510 6/4/2014 MIX Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $187.15 Invoice 439416108 6/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 439416108 6/10/2014 LIQUOR CREDIT Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $143.20 Invoice 460416504 6/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 460416504 6/14/2014 LIQUOR Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $592.15 Refer 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $214.15 Invoice 53956 6/4/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ------- �....... $214.15 „ o.,. ».. ....... _.... 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ _Refer Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES $23.50 Invoice 90305500 6/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $121.50 Invoice 90305500 6/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE, PLASTIC HIGHBALL CUPS $53.00 Invoice 90305500 6/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX - $34.00 Invoice 90347000 6/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies BAGS, SUPPLIES $125.35 Invoice 90340800 6/1312014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE, GIFT BAGS, PLASTIC LOW $35.67 BALL CUPS, STRAWS Invoice 90340800 6/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $68.00 Invoice 90308600 6/9/2014 Transaction Date 6/1812014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $461.02 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,057.96 Invoice 43383600 6/912014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $29.95 Invoice 43383600 6/9/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $119.00 Invoice 43289100 6/2/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $515.15 Invoice 43373000 6/6/2014 -1212- CITY OF MOUND 06/19/1410:41 AM Page 2 Payments VTY OF [AOUND Current Period: June 2014 Cash Payment K111A, BEER Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Transaction Date $956.30 Invoice 43469500 6/13/2014 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,765.60 Invoice 43485900 6/16/2014 Wells Fargo Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,205.96 Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $131.50 Invoice 138864 6/412014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,051.70 Invoice 138865 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$47,40 Invoice 323005 6/4/2014 Transaction Date 6/1812014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,135.80 Refer 6 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $324.88 Invoice 0168055109 6/12/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 . . ......... Total $324.88 Refer 7 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $583.60 Invoice 1092622 6/16/2014 Transaction Date 6118/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $583.60 Refer 8 DAYDISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,735.50 Invoice 756818 6/17/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$25,30 Invoice 06-16-14RPA 6/16/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $119.90 Invoice 756819 6/1712014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,183,65 Invoice 755714 6/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE-GLASSWARE $105.00 Invoice 756487 6/1312014 Transaction Date 6118/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,118.75 Refer 9 ENKI BREWING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $340,00 Invoice 2720 6/12/2014 Transaction Date 6118/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $340.00 P.ror in F7Yr.'1=1.q1r)RRRFW1N(, COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-262 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 3881 6/9/2014 Transaction Date 6118/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 11 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice W975468 6/11/2014 Transaction Date 6118/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 12 FLAT EARTH BREWING COMPANY -1213- $106,00 10100 Total $106.00 $145.50 10100 Total $145.50 GffY OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2014 06/19/14 10:41 AM Page 3 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $130.00 Invoice 9100 616/2014 , Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.00 Refer 14 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTINGMINN Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER BALANCE $6.10 Invoice 2194499 -1 4/22/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$7.00 Invoice 2199577 5/8/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $132.00 Invoice 2210779 5/27/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $50.00 Invoice 2226037 6/3/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $81.10 Refer 13 JJ TAYLOR, DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $327.25 Invoice 2226045 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $74.00 Invoice 2226048 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $44.00 Invoice 2226049 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $330.60 Invoice 2226035 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,568.61 Invoice 2226036 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $50.00 Invoice 028095 5/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,352.35 Invoice 2226125 6117/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,582.55 Invoice 2226137 6/17/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $334.00 Invoice 2226091 6/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $334.00 Invoice 2226091 6/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $116.00 Invoice 2226094 6/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,850.75 Invoice 2226090 6/10/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,864.11 Refer 15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,702.89 Invoice 1872969 6/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $6,138.05 Invoice 1872970 6/11/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 , Wells Fargo 10100 ... -ati , ,� ,�....., .�,...,.. „..,v o Total $9,840.94 - �.,�...� „.,.,, -... >.........�...,.,�, ,,,,,,,, ,, Refer 16 ,,, , ,v-,,, . , -"' , -ry ..e JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ ..,.. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $151.25 Invoice 1867387 6/4/2014 -1214- CITY OF MOUND 06/19/14 10:41 AM � '-- -. --'� Page 5 \ Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2615337 6/4/2014 Refer _ 2 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2615336 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2615338 6/4/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 22 PHILLIPS WINEAND SPIRITS INC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 2619075 6/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2619076 6/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 2619077 6/11/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo - - Refer 23 QUILL COM � .,w . .111 - --� -1 10100 $1,005.40 $1,992.60 $56.00 Total $3,054.00 $4,275.35 $542.90 $56.00 10100 Total $4,874.25 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -200 Office Supplies THERMAL REGISTER ROLLS Invoice 3395059 6 6/3/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 W Wells Fargo Refer _ 2 24 SOUTHERN WINE &SPIRITS OF 10100 $430.12 Total $430.12 $1,908.00 $378.18 $0.00 $1,643.18 $0.00 $1,308.00 $36.14 $22.50 - $314.99 10100 Total $4,981.01 $189.00 10100 Total $189.00 $175.10 $7,095.35 _ CITY OF MOUND 06/19/1410:41 AM Page 6 Payments CITY OF MOUND Refer 31 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 505855 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 505856 6/4/2014 -1216- $554.51 $23.00 Current Period: June 2014 .1F.:, in �1 ,+.MMIEW"Y"11 . „. Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,010.98 Invoice 827958 6/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $30.00 Invoice 827967 6/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $47.20 Invoice 827959 6/10/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 1.0100 Total $8,358.63 Refer 27 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies 25 REGISTER PRINTER RIBBONS $192.59 Invoice 51717 61412014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.59 Refer 28 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $448.00 Invoice 0100112 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 0100112 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $530.00 Invoice 0100544 6112/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 0100544 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $36.75 Invoice 0100113 61512014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.00 Invoice 0100113 6/5/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,036.75 Refer 29 WEBLEASE USA _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY WEBSITE SVC- HWS 6 -15 -14 TO 7- $99.00 14 -14 Invoice 65119 6115/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.00 Refer ...,.�.,,.,. 30 WI_,. NE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 60949750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $272.00 Invoice 363931 6/1212014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $8.25 Invoice 363931 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE - GLASSWEAR $136.00 Invoice 363931 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $665.33 Invoice 363304 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $11.55 Invoice 363304 6/5/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,093.13 Refer 31 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 505855 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 505856 6/4/2014 -1216- $554.51 $23.00 _ CITY OF MOUND 06/19/14 10:41 AM — Page 7 Payments fiY OF MOUND Current Period: June 2014 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $104,836.68 $104,836.68 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $104,836.68 Total $104,836.68 -1217- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,683.42 Invoice 506809 6/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $23.00 Invoice 506810 6111/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,283.93 Refer _ 32 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,841.83 Invoice 1090234841 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $435.00 Invoice 1090234842 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $45.60 Invoice 1090234843 6/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $119.00 Invoice 1090234844 6/412014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,193.70 Invoice 1090238474 6/11/2014 Transaction Date 6/18/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,635.13 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT_ _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $201.75 Invoice 1080187561 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $376.00 Invoice 1080187562 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $72.00 Invoice 1080187563 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,453.24 Invoice 1080187560 6/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $621.38 Invoice 1080190505 6112/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $96.00 Invoice 1080190507 6/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $731.50 Invoice 1080190506 6/1212014 Transaction Date 611812014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,551.87 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $104,836.68 $104,836.68 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $104,836.68 Total $104,836.68 -1217- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES June 10, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 10, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Attorney Melissa Manderschied, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Greg Nybeck, Dan Faulkner, Amy Ferrar, Jennifer Mundt, John McKinley, Bill Priebe, Kaitlin Jameson, Sheri Lee, Scott Thoma, Mike Wood, Michelle Wood, James Dolan, Mick Murphy, Joe Bohmert, Joe Marston, Don Homann, Tom Casey, Judd Luesse, Chris Laurie, Scott Kivisto, Derek Ervin, Lenore Doering, Jackie Davis, Wayne Davis, Joe Bruns, Art King, Barb King, Marnie Barnhart, Stuart Alexander, Diane Alexander, Karen Babler, John Babler, John Hubler, John Turnacliff Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Hanson requested consent item 4H be added to cancel the June 17 Special Meeting Workshop. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $225,784.80. B. Approve minutes of the May 27, 2014 regular meeting. C. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -37: RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2014 CRACK REPAIR PROJECT TO PRECISION SEALCOATING, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,625.00. CITY PROJECT NO PW -14 -06 D. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -38: RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 2014 STREET, UTILITY, AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — EAST THREE POINTS BOULEVARD TO GMH ASPHALT, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,479,671.33. CITY PROJECT NOS. PW- 14 -01, PW- 14 -02, PW -14 -08 -1218- Mound City Council Minutes — June 10, 2014 E. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -39: RESOLUTION APPROVING MINOR SUBDIVISION AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE — PID #13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 — PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -05 2. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -40: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES AT 2201 CENTERVIEW LANE — PID #13- 117 -24 -31 -0040 — PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -06 F. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -41: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF FIREFIGHTER PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT "TURNOUT" GEAR FOR FIREFIGHTER SAFETY G. Approve liquor license renewals for 2014 -2015 with receipt of all required forms, fees, and certificates of insurance: On -Sale Liquor — Al & Alma's Supper Club Corp., Willette Companies, Inc. (dba Carbone's Pizzeria Bar & Grill); On -Sale Wine — Dakota Trail Inc. (dba Dakota Junction); Sunday On -Sale Liquor —AI & Alma's Supper Club Corp., Willette Companies, Inc. (dba Carbone's Pizzeria Bar & Grill), American Legion Post 398; Sunday On -Sale Wine — Dakota Trail Inc. (dba Dakota Junction); 3.2 On -Sale — Dakota Trail Inc. (dba Dakota Junction; Sunday 2:00 a.m. Closing — Willette Companies, Inc. (dba Carbone's Pizzeria Bar & Grill); Club On -Sale Liquor — American Legion Post 398; Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Beverages — Northern Tier Retail, LLC (dba SuperAmerica #4194) H. (added) Cancel Special Meeting Workshop scheduled for June 17, 2014 at 6:30 pm. The meeting will take place as an HRA meeting. 5. Comments and suggestions trom citizens present on any item not on the agenaa. None were offered. 6. Kandis Hanson City Manager, with an update on the sewer by -pass event May 31, 2014 to present. Mayor indicated that City Manager will go through the sewer bypass event that took place on June 1't. Hanus stated the purpose of the discussion is to explain what happened, how the City reacted, and the current status. Hanson stated that representatives from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) are present. Hanson stated she will give an overview of ecological information and that a public forum will take place. Hanson summarized the events and current status by reading from a prepared statement. Hanson explained that Hennepin County regulates the beaches and that the beach closures were not related to the sewer bypass event, but rather the recurring issue of goose feces and farm run -off during periods of heavy rain. Hanson summarized infrastructure improvements including lift station improvement projects and stated that the City is evaluating alternative notification systems in an effort to improve communication during emergency events. Steve Lee, Emergency Response Manager for the MPCA, Kaitlin Jameson, and Bill Priebe were present from the MPCA. Mr. Lee said the City did what they were required to do by contacting the State Duty Officer who agreed it was better to bypass the sewer than to cause back -ups in basements. MPCA received reports of 19 cities that had to bypass or release. MPCA states that the City is taking steps to test the sites where the bypass occurred. The Mayor -1219- Mound City Council Minutes — June 10, 2014 commended and thanked the MPCA and the City Staff. Hanus clarified the discharged wastewater was filtered to avoid any solids from being released. Hanson read a blog posting titled "Sewage Stinks" from Dick Osgood, former Executive Director of the Lake Minnetonka Association that addressed the bypass event from a biological standpoint. Hanson stated the statement put the contamination in context with other events and made her feel better about the decision to bypass. Hanus invited members of the audience forward to speak and /or ask questions. Amy Ferrar, 4638 Manchester Road, asked about Met Council's infrastructure and capacity. Hanus stated the City will be meeting with the Met Council in the future. Ferrar asked the MPCA if there are other pollutants in the lake besides E. coli and what agency is responsible to test for them. Steve Lee from the MPCA said the primary test is for the bacteria. Hanus said he believed oxygen and pH levels are also monitored. Ferrar asked how the City can prevent this from happening again. The Mayor reiterated the sump pump inspections and infrastructure improvements that the City has done. Jennifer Mundt, Met Council Representative for Mound and other lake area cities, said she hoped we can all move past blame and agree that we have to move forward. Mundt said the Met Council's regional system did not fail and that the back -up pumps kicked in. Mundt said the solution is to address inflow and infiltration and that there are homes with sump pumps and foundations that are illegally draining into the sanitary sewer system. Mundt said it was talked about increasing capacity if Mound's population increased, which it has not. Mundt stated she spoke with Senator Osmek about working together as a region to address the problem. Steve Holman, 5320 Bartlett Boulevard, asked about communication, especially for those who do not have computer access. Holman asked about plans if additional rain comes. The Mayor stated the Council and Staff have not recalled a similar event and that this was a very rare, unique event. Hanson stated the City would consider similar action, if needed. Hanson stated that a past survey indicated 25 percent of Mound residents do not have a computer and that she has been told many people don't read the City Newsletter. Hanson suggested residents consider adopting a neighbor without a PC to help with communication. Hanson indicated that the school district uses a telephone system which can include home and cell phones. The Mayor commented that knocking on doors in an emergency situation is time consuming and phones seem like a better option. Holman suggested flyers may help. Scott Thoma, 4679 Wilshire Boulevard, stated this is not an act of God but an I &I issue. Thoma stated City leadership can do a better job and that he would like answers from Mound and the Met Council. Thoma wants to know who is going to take ownership for what happens and provide help /advocate for the residents. The Mayor stated systems are built for larger than normal capacity, but the question is to what level it should be built. Danene Provencher, 2591 Commerce Boulevard, asked about the hazard of using Lake Langdon water to water garden and plants. James Dolan stated that the DNR rates Lake Langdon as an "F" and therefore would not be suitable for use on food source gardens. Provencher asked why other Lake Minnetonka cities where not affected. Hanson said police reports show that overflowing sewers were reported elsewhere. John Babler, 2235 Langdon Lane, stated that this is the 4th back -up in his home and the problem has to be solved. Babler stated he appreciated the City Manager's prior help. -1220- Mound City Council Minutes — June 10, 2014 Marnie Barnhart, 2223 Langdon Lane, said she has concerns that we do not have a communication program in place, especially since 9/11 and that this is the second back -up for her. John Hubler, 5448 Breezy Road, stated that there are a lot of upset people but he agrees with what was done. Hubler stated that the sump pump program from years ago was a proactive program and another program should be initiated to create a "sealed- type" system. Hubler asked how much money the City sends MCES every month. Moore stated that it is about $88,000 / month and Hubler suggested escrowing it to encourage a response by MCES. Hubler suggested the auto dialer system could be set up to call affected residents. Hubler asked if the City's insurance ever paid a back -up claim and Hanson indicated that she is aware of some claims that were not paid. Hubler asked about whether the vacuum truck could be used to pump on agriculture land which can be done with a permit. Hubler suggested residents install a backflow preventer, although it is not guaranteed to work. Hubler encouraged everyone to use a proactive approach. Michael Wood, 2270 Langdon Lane, stated he and his neighbor had backflow preventers, but both had back -ups. Wood asked what can be done in the short term and acknowledged the vac truck could not keep up. Wood said back -ups are not a one -time thing and something should be done. John Turnacliff, 2560 Avon Drive, asked what residents would do if communication had taken place. Hanus said some said they would remove property. Turnacliff asked that if this happened again, would it be in the same locations. Moore indicated that was likely. Turnacliff asked for a sense of urgency to address these issues as severe weather events seem more common. Wayne Davis, 2248 Langdon Lane, indicated that upgrades have taken place and urged the Council to focus on problem areas like Langdon. Hanson stated she met with Met Council in December and discussed the Langdon neighborhood because the homes feed directly into the Met Council line. Joe Bruns, 2630 Setter Circle, suggested heavy fines for sump pumps and that the communication system be two -way. Several individuals said they called 911 but did not receive a call back or response. Brian Hanson, 4697 Wilshire Boulevard, asked if other communities with vacuum trucks were called to assist. Hanson stated that sewer water is still coming in and that it took 3 -4 days for someone from the City to get back to him. Kandis Hanson stated that it is the property owner's responsibility to do the clean up. Moore indicated that they were contacted by the LMCIT and that the line will be televised tomorrow to try to determine why water is still coming in. James Dolan, 2280 Cottonwood Lane, commended the City for its action during the rain event. Dolan indicated that he collects rain data and that his home is near 3 utilities, including the Mound gravity line, the Minnetrista forcemain and the Met Council line. Dolan shared the rain data and said that severe weather is becoming the norm and needs to be addressed. Dolan said he observed water coming out of the MCES manhole, a very low volume of water coming out of Mound's gravity line, and that there was water gushing out of the Minnetrista forcemain. Dolan recommended a high water alarm and that older floor drains should have a check valve installed. -1221- Mound City Council Minutes — June 10, 2014 John McKinley, 5948 Hillcrest Road, questioned the statement that this has never happened before because he spoke with former Public Works employees Gino Hoff and Greg Skinner who said waste material was previously trucked. Hanson clarified that it has been trucked, but not discharged into the lake sites before. Tom Casey, 2854 Cambridge Lane, stated that the goal should be to not further denigrate Lake Langdon. Casey requested an open work session to create a solution on a timely basis and that there be a written agreement by the City and Met Council to work together to find a workable solution. Hanus reiterated that Mound will be meeting with the Met Council but location and date has yet to be determined. Hanus recessed the meeting at 9:00 p.m. to change the recording media. Chris Laurie, 4773 Richmond Road, asked about the MCES lift station and questioned their response. Laurie asked how many people were affected. Hanson said the report she has shows 34 houses were affected. Moore showed a graphic which depicted the locations where the backups occurred. Mayor commented that, with the exception of Langdon, the rest are pretty spread out. Moore stated insurance records of the events will be analyzed to look for issues. Casey asked if the areas with back -ups were the low areas and Moore said not in all cases. Lenore Doering, 3118 Donald Drive, talked about being on one of the highest points on Donald Drive and that everything in her basement was destroyed. Chris Laurie, 4773 Richmond Road, indicated they are on the lower part of a hill and they tend to get the rain as they are on the bottom and it seems there is a back -up still. Tom Casey asked how the storm water pollution prevention plan ( SWPPP) relates. Moore stated that the SWPPP is separate and is about dumping contaminants like motor oil into the storm sewer. Marnie Barnhart, 2223 Langdon Lane, encouraged the Council to show compassion as it would go a long way. Hanus stated of course he is sorry and that it was unfortunate all the way around and he truly hopes it does not happen again. Judd Luesse, 2144 Southview Lane, said he has not heard anyone say that our system has adequate capacity and questions whether remodeling and new homes should be allowed. Moore stated that the capacity has a "safety factor" built in for increased growth and a standard amount of I &I. Moore stated huge systems come at huge costs. Luesse suggested the system should be fixed to add reserve capacity. Moore stated the focus should be to reduce /minimize I &i. Luesse said the emergency overflow pond should be reactivated by the Met Council and asked why Mound doesn't have authority over all lift stations in the City. Danene Provencher, 2591 Commerce Boulevard, asked for full transparency and indicated that the Met Council was going to do a Power Point presentation at this meeting but was not allowed. Jennifer Mundt, speaking on behalf of the Met Council, expressed interest in working cooperatively with Mound and the MPCA in an open meeting forum in Mound. -1222- Mound City Council Minutes — June 10, 2014 7. Nybeck gave a Power Point presentation addressing the high water code provisions and current lake levels. Nybeck said the preliminary 2015 LMCD levy is essentially flat and the official amount is due to the cities by July 1st. Nybeck said the lake is too high and there is currently no harvesting being conducted. Rent decreased, a 2% increase in personnel expense and 3% merit increase was assumed in contingency, and additional funds were added for AIS prevention and capital equipment. Nybeck said the levy has been essentially flat since 2009. Hanus asked if personnel adjustments were tied to CPI and Nybeck indicated assumptions are based on a salary survey. Hanus suggested the slight increase be flattened and Nybeck suggested the City Manager send an email to that effect. Salazar asked about milfoil reduction programs and why the emphasis is not to eradicate it. Nybeck stated the U of M has been involved in studying AIS since the 1990's and the harvesting program has been cut back. Hanus poled the Council regarding the recommended levy increase and Wegscheid said he agreed it should be zero. Hanson said she will send Nybeck and email stating that. 8. Faulkner gave an overview of the 2014 Mound Drainage Improvement Project. Faulkner listed each individual project and depicted aerials /maps on the overhead. Faulkner said the estimated cost is $108,060. Faulkner suggested eliminating the Tuxedo project until the street is reconstructed in 2015. Gillespie asked about the high mobilization costs and Faulkner said it is the contractor getting the equipment to the site. Mayor asked about brush removal on Waterbury project and possible erosion. Hanus asked about the amount of dredging to be done and Faulkner said it is only a 1 to 2 feet. Mayor asked about possible grants and Faulkner said they have been trying but it is difficult to get grants for maintenance and the requirements can be a challenge. Mayor inquired about the cost and funding sources. Faulkner stated that he didn't anticipate more than the 30 percent for indirect costs and that quotes would be solicited since it is less than $100K. Gillespie pointed out the resolution mentions bids. Salazar asked if there is a way to "line" them to avoid future growth and Faulkner said the issue is sediment. The Mayor said that may inhibit the filtration effect. MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to adopt the following resolution minus the Tuxedo Boulevard project. The Mayor offered a friendly amendment to replace the bid language with quote language which was accepted by Gesch and Wegscheid. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -42: RESOLUTION RECEIVING A REPORT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE 2014 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. PW 14 -04 VA Faulkner gave an overview of the program and the requirements including the public meeting. Mayor asked for public comment and received none. Faulkner said that no official action is required by the Council and that the report will be filed by Bolton & Menk. -1223- Mound City Council Minutes — June 10, 2014 9. Information /Miscellaneous Mark Wegsheid highlighted the Planning Commission vacancy and Hanson thanked Mr. Wiechert for his service. A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager: B. Minutes: C. Reports: Harbor Wine & Spirits — May 2014 Orono Police Commission Meeting — June 4, 2014 D. Correspondence: Resignation of Planning Commission Pete Wiechert 10. Adjourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Wegscheid, to adjourn at 10:25 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1224- Mayor Mark Hanus • Z ® Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com June 19, 2014 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvements Project City Project No. PW -14 -08 Award of Bid Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: On June 17, 2014 a total of 2 bids were received, as indicated below, for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvements Project. This is the section from the Lost Lake outlet bridge to Wilshire Boulevard which was originally bid as a separate section in the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Three Points Boulevard, on April 1, 2014. That bid was rejected by Council on April 22, 2014 and authorization was given to bid the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvements as a separate project. The project bid submittal was set up to allow contractors to bid one or both options of trenchless watermain replacement and if one contractor submitted bids for both options, it would be considered as two bids. Bid Amount 1. Widmer Construction LLC, Pipe Bursting $645,759.50 2. Widmer Construction LLC, CIPP Rehabilitation $674,987.80 Widmer's Pipe Bursting bid of $645,759.50 was 7.5% below the Engineer's Estimate of $698,057. While Widmer Construction is the prime contractor, the actual pipe bursting portion of the project will be done by a subcontractor, Red Pederson Utilites, Inc. Both Widmer Construction and Red Pederson Utilities have completed several similar projects throughout the metro area. We recommend that the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvements project be awarded to Widmer Construction LLC in the amount of $645,759.50. A resolution is attached for your consideration recommending award of bid. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer DE51GNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer -1225- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE BARTLETT BOULEVARD WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (PW14 -08) WHEREAS, Resolutions, 14 -27, 14 -28, 14 -29, 14 -30 and 14 -31 were adopted by the Council on April 22, 2014 which: rejected the bid submitted on April 1, 2014 for the Three Points Boulevard Project from Commerce Boulevard to the East end; split the Three Points Boulevard project at Avocet Lane into two projects, an East Three Points Boulevard project and a West Three Points Boulevard project; authorized dividing the West Three Points Boulevard project into a Utility Improvement Project, to be bid in the fall of 2014, and a Street/Retaining Wall Improvement Project, to be bid early 2015; authorized the Bartlett Watermain improvements to be bid as a separate project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvements Project, bids were received on June 17, 2014, opened and tabulated according to law, with the following bids received and complying with the advertisement: Widmer Construction LLC, Pipe Bursting $645,759.50 Widmer Construction LLC CIPP Rehabilitation $674,987.80 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Widmer Construction LLC out of Maple Plain, MN is the lowest responsible bidder with the Pipe Bursting option, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into the attached contract with Widmer Construction LLC out of Maple Plain, MN, in the name of the City of Mound for the Bartlett Boulevard Watermain Improvements Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by the City Council this 24' day of June 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk -1226- Mark Hanus, Mayor CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD WHEREAS, Minnesota State Statutes 20313.121 states that the governing body of a municipality with responsibility to accept and reject absentee ballots must, by ordinance or resolution, establish a ballot board consisting of a sufficient number of election judges trained in the handling of absentee ballots; and WHEREAS, the ballot board may include staff trained as election judges, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby appoints an Absentee Ballot Board as provided in Minnesota State Statutes 20313121. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it has been determined, based on the number of absentee ballots cast in the primary and general elections of 2012, that three members is a sufficient number for the absentee ballot board, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the members of the Absentee Ballot Board for the primary and general election are hereby named as Collette Roberts, Amy Stark and Jill Norlander. Adopted by the City Council this 24`h day of June, 2014 Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1227- Mayor Mark Hanus EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: BACKGROUND Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner May 28, 2014 14 -10 and 14 -11 Variance and Expansion Permit Rose Lorsung, Recreate Real Estate 4861 Shoreline Drive B -2 General Business District Neighborhood Business The applicant, Scott Erickson, the new property owner of 4861 Shoreline Drive, is requesting variance and expansion permit approval to undertake a remodel /addition project. The property is located at the corner of Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) and Montclair Lane. Ms. Rose Lorsung of Pulse Real Estate is a representative for the property owner. According to Hennepin County property information, the property at 4861 Shoreline Drive is approximately 4,862 square feet. The building, which was constructed in 1966, is approximately 1,570 square feet and is the former location of Westonka Animal Clinic who vacated the building in 2013 when they moved to their new location in downtown Mound. The property was recently purchased by Scott Erickson for reuse as his corporate office for his business (Erickson Outdoor Lighting). Provided below are summary details from the applicant about the proposed new use: • Principal use of the building will be office and will also include storage. No exterior or open storage will take place on premise • No retail business • There are (5) employees of Erickson Lighting Company, however, they are generally not on premise as business is done on the road and at job sites ® Normal business hours • No retail sales • No assembly or manufacturing on site • Loading and unloading will occur at the overhead doors on the west facing elevation fronting Monclair • One UPS delivery truck a day is anticipated along with one larger delivery truck one time per week • One commercial vehicle will be kept on the premise and stored inside The applicants are proposing an exterior /interior remodel the building which includes construction of a 14' x 32.5' addition on the south side of the building, replacement of the existing canopy with a pergola and fa4ade improvements including a new parapet wall on the "front" (north side of the building) with architectural features ( "arches "). The site is nearly 100 percent hardcover. The proposed building will maintain the same setback on the west elevation (15.5 feet) with the new setback on the south side proposed at 9 feet, 8 inches. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their June 3, 2014 meeting and was supportive of the proposed building reuse and upgrade. The applicant indicated that they plan to add additional architectural features including fagade Lighting, decorative vases /pots and landscaping in the future. Parking was also discussed and Staff noted that the use is less intense that the previous vet clinic use and that the site can accommodate the required spaces. Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. ADDITIONAL COMMENT The City executed a 60 -day extension as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd (f) related to action on the requested variance and expansion permit applications on June 9, 2014. 11229 -Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 3, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, and Bill Stone. Absent: Douglas Gawtry, David Goode, Pete Wiechert and Mark Wegscheid. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Others present: James Starkman (no address given); Sherry[ Hopkins, 5030 Bartlett Blvd; Shelly Dorion, 5033 Bartlett Blvd; Brett Macnally, 5024 Tuxedo Blvd; Karl & Julie Weisenhorn, 1733 Bluebird; Kally Johnson, 2331 Driftwood La; Scott Erickson, 1840 Shadywood Rd; Jen Barrett, 5001 Wilshire Blvd. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14-10f,4441 1 ( arlance arft2 Expa tj *IPe�$��� �. p ., k t 4861 Shoreline Drive ATR�`anSco yckson 1t; r �n. Scott Erickson, the propexty,,0 er�� f 486 =Sbbrelin *"� ve, is requesting variance and expansion permit approval to undertake a remodel /addition project. The property is located at the corner of Shoreline Drive and Montclair Lane. The project includes replacement of the existing canopy with a new parapet attached to the north face and an addition on the south side of the building. The site is nearly 100% hardcover. The setback on the west elevation (15.5 feet) will be maintained with a proposed setback on the south side of 9 feet, 8 inches. Parking is expected to be lighter in use than the previous veterinary clinic. A total of six spaces are planned, including 1 ADA space. Staff views the parking plan to be acceptable for the proposed use. East side setback is 2 feet + / -. The applicant is advised to work with the Building Official to ensure conformity with fire separation requirements. It is also suggested they work with the MCWD to assure compliance with the watershed requirements. Retterath — pertaining to hardcover, the site is completely paved over. A few years ago there was discussion on a neighboring property regarding removing hardcover. Smith indicated that the commercial hardcover maximum is 75 %. We cannot require them to remove existing hardcover. However, we can encourage the applicant to reduce hardcover. -1230- Smieja sought clarification on whether the 2 parking spots on the north end demonstrate the minimum requirement. Smith stated that Staff is confident that they can demonstrate the required spaces and ADA required space on the site. Scott Erickson (1840 Shadywood Rd, Orono) notes that he is planning on adding landscaping and decorative planters if he is able to expand the building and make it his headquarters. Bergquist asked if they planned to reuse the existing sign. Erickson said they will wrap the existing sign in cedar and have some lighting over the top, possibly backlit; additional lighting near the building. MOTION by Stone, second by Retterath, to recommend approval of the variance to include Staff recommendations and findings of fact. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Bergquist, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the expansion permit to include Staff recommendations and findings of fact. MOTION carried unanimously. �.s y Falk 41k 1 �v ��P g F. -1231- RESOLUTION NO 13- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE AND EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 4861 SHORELINE DRIVE PLANNING CASE 14 -10 AND PLANNING CASE 14 -11 PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -44 -0018 WHEREAS, the applicant, Scott Erickson, submitted a request for a variance and expansion permit for a commercial building remodel /addition project at 4861 Shoreline Drive; and WHEREAS, the property is located at the corner of Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) and Montclair; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the B -2 General Business zoning district; and WHEREAS, according to Hennepin County property information, the property at 4861 Shoreline Drive is approximately 4,862 square feet. The building, which was constructed in 1966, is approximately 1,570 square feet; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing an exterior /interior remodel of the building which includes construction of a 14' x 32.5' addition on the south side of the building, replacement of the existing canopy with a pergola and fagade improvements including a new parapet wall on the "front" (north side of the building) with architectural features ( "arches "). The proposed building will maintain the same setback on the west elevation (15.5 feet) with the proposed new setback on the south side proposed at 9 feet, 8 inches: and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested expansion permit for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the June 3, 2014 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. -1232- b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. and; WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance and expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance and expansion permit were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 3, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the variance and expansion permit, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance and expansion permit request at its June 24, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The variance is being requested due to the location of the existing building which currently has nonconforming setbacks. At under 5,000 square feet the lot is undersized for the B -2 General Business District. This significantly limits the ability to create a conforming structure. 4. The variance is needed so as to facilitate the addition on the subject property. 5. Reuse and upgrade of existing buildings, particularly ones that are vacant, is viewed as favorable. 6. The proposed addition will be built over existing paved areas so the amount of hardcover on the site will not change as a result of the project. 1233- WHEREAS, in granting approval of the expansion permit request, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. Criteria of City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are being met. 2. The expansion permit is requested due to the location of the existing building on the site which has nonconforming setbacks. 3. The expansion permit is needed so as to facilitate a remodel /addition project on the subject property. 4. Reuse and upgrade of existing buildings, particularly ones that are vacant, is viewed as favorable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance and expansion permit with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall work with Staff to modify that proposed project, as needed, so as to maintain hardcover on the site equal to or less than the existing amount. 2. Applicant shall have a foundation survey to ensure that the proposed addition is located as proposed. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 4. Applicant shall work with Staff and the Building Official related to parking including the needed ADA space. 5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action. 6. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 9. No building permit for the addition(s) will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. -1234- The variance and expansion permit are hereby approved for the following legally described property: (to be inserted) Adopted by the City Council this 24`h day of June 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -1235- nA. TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BACKGROUND Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner May 28, 2014 (revised June 19, 2014 to correct typos) 14 -10 and 14 -11 Variance and Expansion Permit Rose Lorsung, Recreate Real Estate 4861 Shoreline Drive B -2 General Business District Neighborhood Business The applicant, Scott Erickson, the new property owner of 4861 Shoreline Drive, is requesting variance and expansion permit approval to undertake a remodel /addition project. The property is located at the corner of Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) and Montclair. Ms. Rose Lorsung of Pulse Real Estate is a representative for the property owner. REVIEW PROCEDURE Variance City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. in evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. -1236- According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Expansion Permit City Code Section 129 -40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be issued when the City Code imposes practical difficulties for the property owner in the reasonable use of a property. The following are the criteria that should be satisfied: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c, adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. -1237- 60 -DAY PROCESS The expansion permit and variance applications were submitted on April 18, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be April 21, 2014 for the expansion permit and variance applications. The City's current deadline for action on the applications is on or about June 16, 2014 unless the City executes an extension as provided by Minnesota Statutes 15.99, Subd. 2 (a). ZONING The property is zoned General business district (B -2) and subject to the provisions of City Code Chapter 129 -137. City Code Sec. 129 -137 (b) includes the lot area, height, lot width and yard requirements. The excerpts are provided below: (b) Lot area, height, lot width and yard requirements (8 -2). The lot area, height, lot width and yard requirements for the B -2 district are as follows (1) No building shall exceed 35 feet in height. (2) The minimum lot area is 20,000 square feet. (3) The front, side, rear setbacks are 30 feet. (4) The minimum setback from side or rear lot line if abutting any residential district is 50 feet. (5) if the City Council allows more than one building on one lot, an open space equal to half the sum of the heights of the two buildings must be provided between the buildings. (6) Refer to section 129- 316(b), pertaining to screening. (7) The minimum lot width is 80 feet. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION According to Hennepin County property information, the property at 4861 Shoreline Drive is approximately 4,862 square feet. The building, which was constructed in 1966, is approximately 1,570 square feet and is the former location of Westonka Animal Clinic who vacated the building in 2013 when they moved to their new location in downtown Mound. The property was recently purchased by Scott Erickson for reuse as his corporate office for his business (Erickson Outdoor Lighting.) Below is an overview of some of the details from the applicant / applicant team related to the proposed new use: ® Principal use of the building will be office and will also include storage. No exterior or open storage will take place on premise ® No retail business -1238- ® There are (5) employees of Erickson Lighting Company, however, they are generally not on premise as business is done on the road and at job sites • Normal business hours • No retail sales • No assembly or manufacturing on site • Loading and unloading will occur at the overhead doors on the west facing elevation fronting Monclair • One UPS delivery truck a day is anticipated along with one larger delivery truck one time per week • One commercial vehicle will be kept on the premise and stored inside The applicants are proposing an exterior /interior remodel the building which includes construction of a 14' x 32.5' addition on the south side of the building, replacement of the existing canopy with a pergola and fagade improvements including a new parapet wall on the "front" (north side of the building) with architectural features ( "arches "). The site is nearly 100 percent hardcover. The proposed building will maintain the same setback on the west elevation (15.5 feet) with the proposed new setback on the south side proposed at 9 feet, 8 inches. CITY /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Building Official Scott Qualle This would be a partial change of occupancy and would require permits. Mnspect will also forward plans to the Fire Department for review after building plan review has been completed, if requested. City Manager Kandis Hanson No objections. Fire Chief Greg Pederson Deputy Fire Marshal Tony Myers Due to the size of the building, including the proposed addition, there should be no issues as far as any additional requirements for fire protection systems. Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok Recommend approval. Hennepin County Transportation (Carla Strueve) As long as the proposed structure remains outside of any County right of way and the City is -1239- comfortable with the proposed setback, the County has no issues concerning the request. City Engineer Dan Faulkner No engineering comments; looks like a nice upgrade to the existing building. DISCUSSION 1. The permitted / conditional / accessory uses for the B -2 District are outlined in City Code Chapter 129 -135. "Offices' are permitted uses in the B -2 Zoning District. 2. A 1993 survey and supporting site and buildings plans from HOH Design Company signed by Richard Storlien, who is a licensed architect, were submitted with the applications. Staff did not require an updated survey. However, the Planning Commission and City Council can, at its discretion, request an updated survey to assist with the review process, if it determined that it is needed. 3. There are existing nonconforming conditions including but not limited to setbacks and hardcover. As previously mentioned, a 30 -foot setback to property lines is required on the front, side and rear sides for a building located in the B -2 District. Lot size is also less than the 20,000 minimum square foot requirement. Staff deems these items to be existing conditions. Since the modifications to the building expand the existing conditions, including the front setback for the addition along Monclair, expansion permit approval is required. Also, because the addition creates a lesser setback on the south side, variance approval is also required. 4. Hardcover on commercial properties in Mound is allowed up to 75 percent. Based on information provided by the applicant's representative as well as field inspection, the entire site is hardcover including the area where the addition is proposed. it is noted on the plans that a "planter" on the north side of the building will be removed. Applicant's representative has been advised that hardcover on the property exceeds the 75 percent allowance and pre -dates the City's 1994 adoption of the shoreland and therefore can be maintained. However, any improvements on the site cannot go beyond the current existing condition. 5. Parking for the building, when it was a vet clinic, was located on the west and north sides of the building. There is also on street parking on Monclair. Staff was not aware of a parking problem with the former use and considers the new principal office use to be less intense than the former use based on information from the applicant and applicant team. -1240- 6. The applicant submitted a plan on May 19th which shows the proposed locations where parking can occur. The submitted plan showed 5 spaces plus 1 ADA space with the parking taking place on the west and north sides of the property similar to what occurred when the vet clinic used the building. Members are advised that the existing parking along the west side of the building overhangs the property line. With regard to the submitted site plan, Staff offers the following comments: When the "Office" parking requirement of 1 space per 400 square foot is applied to the square footage in the building that is to be in office use (898 square feet) less 10 percent for unusable space, a parking demand of (2) spaces is determined. The remaining space in the building /addition is to be used for vehicle parking and storage. Staff review of these areas is that they are accessory to the business and do not generate additional parking demand. The design and number of handicapped spaces required for the proposed new use is regulated and subject to the building code. Accessible parking stall requirements are determined by the Building Official who commented that (1) ADA compliant space is required. A copy of the parking plan was submitted to the Building Official on or around 5 -20 -2014. Staffs review is that two (2) spaces plus the ADA can be accommodated on site for the new office use which is consistent with the code. However, if it is determined as part of Planning Commission or City Council review that additional parking is required beyond what can be accommodated on site, a parking agreement or variance would need to be requested. The property has frontage on Shoreline Drive (County Road 15) and Montclair Lane. Off street parking is not allowed along Shoreline Drive, which is a County Road, but is allowed on the west side of Montclair Lane. However, overnight parking is not allowed from November 1St through April 1St. It has been mentioned that there is a commercial truck for the business which Staff understands will be parked inside. Sec. 129 -323 (d) states that no vehicle over one ton capacity bearing a commercial license and no commercial licensed trailer shall be parked or stored in a platted residential district or on a public street except when loading, unloading, or rendering a service. 7. A building permit to undertake improvements which are outside of the scope of the requested expansion permit and variance was submitted and is under review. These improvements include, but are not limited to, new doors and windows and interior walls. With regard to future modifications or improvements to the building, the applicant's team has been advised that that the submittal of plans, signed by a professional engineer, will be required as it is a commercial building. See comments from Building Official Scott Qualle in the Staff /Consultant /Agency section of this report. -1241- 8. The proposed new use will require a Sewer Area Charge (SAC) evaluation and determination from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). This includes an evaluation of whether credits are available on the site. 9. City Code Chapter 119 includes the regulations for signage. Applicant has indicated that the existing freestanding sign /frame will be reused. 10. City Code Section 129 -197 (c) includes the list of allowable encroachments. Applicant is advised that eaves can extend into the yard area provided they do not extend more than two feet into the yard area. Gutters are an allowable encroachment in setback and are not subject to setback. 11. The applicant's team was requested to contact Building Official Scott Qualle to discuss what specific information will be required for the proposed project and the applicable building code requirements for structures located within certain distances between property lines and structures including, but not limited to, fire rating of walls, building openings and /or extensions especially due to the close proximity of the detached garage to the property line. Members are advised that the Building Official was provided a copy of the submitted application and materials as part of the City's routing process. 12. A pergola is proposed to be constructed within the footprint of the existing canopy located on the west side of the building. Information from the applicant indicates that it can accommodate vehicles to drive through or park underneath. Due to its proposed 10 -foot width, discussion about this proposed improvement is recommended. Staff is in favor of the architectural feature of the building but traffic movement on the site could be affected. 13. In September 2011, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) adopted new rules related to wetlands, floodplain and erosion control are in effect; also stormwater and others. Applicant is advised that these rules are under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as rules regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. A copy of the expansion permit and variance application was forwarded to the MCWD for review as part of the routing process for preliminary review. Staff would recommend the applicant contact the MCWD to discuss the regulations and applicable permitting that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Any future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance (as applicable) and /or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. -1242- 4. Reuse and upgrade of existing buildings, particularly ones that are vacant, is viewed as favorable. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered for the variance: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are being met. 2. The variance is being requested due to the location of the existing building which currently has nonconforming setbacks. 3. At under 5,000 square feet the lot is undersized for the B -2 General Business District. This significantly limits the ability to create a conforming structure. 4. The variance is needed so as to facilitate the addition on the subject property. 5. Reuse and upgrade of existing buildings, particularly ones that are vacant, is viewed as favorable. 6. The proposed addition will be built over existing paved areas so the amount of hardcover on the site will not change as a result of the project. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Pending recommendation from the Planning Commission, the proposed applications will be forwarded to an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, possible dates are Tuesday, June 10, 2014 or Tuesday, June 24, 2014. -1243- Max, k Application Pee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Tu ,2c 34 zo i q Case No. I t✓ _ City Council Date 7tki'v '�V/ �-o ! q ux1 sav +33•�i +� tr,Iaa IM SUBJECT SUBJECT Address ���� S�orPCCh� ��V� �ol P1N SS,3�fCo PROPERTY LEGAL Lot s IL aid 1-7 Block Oo Z DESC. Subdivision HL[ CAN i PID# Zoning: Rt R1A R2 R3 BI (R 63 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name �[o¢} �✓' G'%Sov1 Email 5(-0Ne?r`1G)�5c)k1 9 f Me.Cos OWNER (g�0 �,,, (wood, Ro�'J 0ra,D) � S3ct i Address .5t Phone Home �S �C1�( N536 Work 9�° °Li %`i y5 3� Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (N. if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): 5XIul1l' r,�irode lojeLaI- - Y -sAls /t, 70l o�u , 3o % C ,acct II b �dfkrl c/+ � -S um �,YOan c, `oA jr, .Si 1/4 P/P to/,A�,, Itf f-ed x 3 Z re 4 ", Variance Information (10121/2013) Page 4 of 6 -1244- Case No. Z _1 , _ 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. SETBACKS: Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: Lakeside: (PS EW) (NSS)N) (NSE (NEW) (NSEW) : (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: MOM-7:4107 .�O ft. .3o ft. A ft. ft. � ft. 00 so ft <o° s ft [�(7ri•FM24 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( )0, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conformity: 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: Expansion Permit Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -1245- Case No. F � 0 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes O, No N. If yes, explain: �A !n lM �/f /�it9 f.UGIS (.�OAr4ul -ke',i /i1 T17 e. 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (P. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes QC), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? �ja{'jnn f(� toejt,�� 4r 5iogfl YOU- 161-1 j 15710 SF) GL to Size %mOb'k') a -"W 9'i171- /v 7qw C �-4 z t✓n -'rl � 9. Comments: ��k i �GGt'!J erd�elwll4bkI 1eyU,Yrkf 7111E S'lma// (14 u r rS �tt>liY'( (emu, /�C r;1g /Po>� , �' rfz',- nat/ �,,,a(- �,C'"f[•,.,,,t, /�W, / "l/ �e ✓zA- .�o��/G� eG,Aa -ee Q ,� 7� / � iLVNaf� -lO aPr "{7 i�ufi t2tJ U /J�'C� I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate- I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Applicant's Signature Variance Informabon (101212013) Page 6 of 6 -1246- Date 4 Date r EXPANSION PERMIT _ APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 553 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No.�� SUBJECT Address yw sfierE �/n < Dnyp� tvaLlt 111 �9N 5 5 3 E% Lot S C � a Block C> �- PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. sr�l�Ley �tl��s Subdivision u�vir PID # /3 — 11-7­'t 17'Y— �(f ` �() /D Cy zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 6)B3 (cirde one) PROPERTY Name(of/ 45_�-I'K'roy; Email SCoff2fG�C,o� �C�Gn�.COr� OWNER Address I G io S'��wood 1�oa C'�o�io A/N 5"5391/ Phone Home 15)- LIN- r-656 Work g5;_hY- `,5-3C Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No 0. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): mo U Y/ Ic Expansion Permit Information (10/21/2013) Page 4 of 6 _1.247_ Example of detached garage: My neighbor on Avon just built this detached garage that is taller that the existing house. 132-6- The proposed detached garage does not meet the code due to the height restriction. The proposed detached garage would be 2' taller than the existing house structure. This is what makes it peculiar. In order to provide adequate storage above the garage that allows egress and engress with a height that will allow entry and exit. If the foundation were to change to comply with the code, it could cause erosion for adjacent properties. This variance would be similar to others issues in the neighborhood. (see pictures) Example of detached garage: My neighbor on Avon just built this detached garage that is taller that the existing house. - 13,27- Per Mound City Code, Section 129 -2, building height and building line are defined as follows: Building Height. The vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a bgWLrQjjLe to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. Building Line. R line parallel to the street right -of -way or the ordinary high water level at any story level of a building and representing the minimum distance which all or-any part of the building is set back from said right- of-way line or ordinary high water level. 1. Describe the type of roof style e'xl5rVm q: nl (i.e. pltchad, flat, shed roof, etc.) U 2. Provide the average grade elevation of the building line facing the street: q(U ` {.25 based on ex5k-inq .grades referenced on submitted survey. 3. Provide the average grade elevation of the building line facing the rear of the lot or lake: 'jU`5 • % based on ex! s 1in� grades referenced on submitted survey. 4. Provide the average grade elevation of the building ilne(s): 5. Provide the height of the structure as measured from the lowest grade elevation to highest point of structure: I(P. 2 f +. . 6. Provide the exi5ii n9 height of the structure based on the definition of building helghtroferencedabove: 1L •0i = afA-. IU�zin. The applicant (or designated representative) must provide written and graphic documentation to confirm that the proposed height of the new structure, based on the Zoning Ordinance definition, meets the height regulations of the applicable zoning district. Graphics document must be scaled to allow for checking by Staff. -13 ?$- Per Mound City Code, Section 129 -2, building height and building line are defined as follows: Building Height. The vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a it a to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. Building Line. A tine parallel to the street right -of -way or the ordinary high water level at any story level of a building and representing the minimum distance which all or any part of the building is set back from said right -of -way line or ordinary high water level. 1. Describe the type of roof style proposed: �Ik� 2� (i.e. pitched, flat, shed roof, etc.) 2. Provide the average grade elevation of the building line facing the street: R U2.5 based on proposed. grades referenced on submitted survey. 3. Provide the average grade elevation of the building line facing the rear of the lot or lake: %25 based on proposed grades referenced on submitted survey. 4. Provide the average grade elevation of the building !trials): at (oZ.5 5. Provide the height of the proposed structure as measured from the lowest grade elevation to highest point of structure: v%. I I+. . 6. Provide the proposed height of the structure based on the definition of building height referenced above: 1 .7 The applicant (or designated representative) must provide written and graphic documentation to confirm that the proposed height of the new structure, based on the Zoning Ordinance definition, meets the height regulations of the applicable zoning district. Graphics document must be scaled to allow for checking by Staff. -1a'z9- n HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACCOVERAGE) PROPERTYADDESS: 502j0 OWNER'S NAME: Sh vrY *opklnS LOT AREA SQ, FT, X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... LOT AREA 0305 SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. Existing Lots of Record may have 49 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE 44 X -zu.?- = ((53 TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. ... -- .................................... ...... 1!51 -�5 ] ED/ OVER (indicate difference) ......................... ............................... ........ ��( Q,! PREPARED BY �'�D(oCr�J� INCDATE 5 ^2 -� 1 Revised 1/10 -1$z0- X C 15 J DETACHED BUILDINGS TOTAL HOUSE ........................... X Z� Q _ _ l 00 (GARAGEISHED) X - TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ..... ........................ h DRIVEWAY, PARKING (vevia X AREAS, SIDEWALKS, X ETC. X (j Q Z 3`1 O TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ......... ............................... h�t' ( X = 443 DECKS open decks (1 /4" min. Opening between boards) with a _� pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover. X = %- On * AM 1 � �O E X i5 a De x V�% 6`U S TOTAL DECK .....} ................. ................q... ............ = �v' 1 X = G l TOTAL OTHER ............................. TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. ... -- .................................... ...... 1!51 -�5 ] ED/ OVER (indicate difference) ......................... ............................... ........ ��( Q,! PREPARED BY �'�D(oCr�J� INCDATE 5 ^2 -� 1 Revised 1/10 -1$z0- 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 F Phone 952- 472 -0667 C)TY QFjLg-')O - FAX 952-072 -0626 Y s ' as Y ♦ � � O License Verification ❑ Lead Verification - Checked By _, Ff: crr r trued nn this form will be considered public according to the MN Government Data Practices Act. 1L 6k Vf ut¢uvu vv.Pr- :0 3 O 9LvD RT a U>JD /" t SITE Property Address or PID Business Name/Tenant Applicant is: Owner ❑ Contractor ❑ Tenant OWNER Name S((Y N Y/ i%��%1 ✓� E -Mail 5h /r'rGt� 1, P d✓G �D/ �/9�, f✓rr S ✓ 3 a t?,4e1L c tr O Vt..S City /State/zip'm c r. '/rs ^t,/ Address Phone L Fax Cell 412, 77 b G V7 CONTRACTOR Company Name License # Address City/State/zip Contact Person E -mail Phone Fax Cel( 1) Was the home constructed before 1978? (if YES, continue with question 2; if NO continue without EPA SECTION completing EPA Section) 2) Will the work disturb 6 sq it or more of interior painted surfaces or 20 sq ft or more of exterior painted surfaces? (if YES, go to line 4; if NO line 3) 3) Are there any windows being replaced? (If YES, go to line 4; if NO continue without completing EPA Section) 4) Has this home been Certified Lead Free? (If YES, you MUST Attach Certification Info; if NO go to line 5) 5) EPA Certified Firm Name: Zip Code: Phone: ARCHITECT Name AND /OR Phone Fax Cell ENGINEER VALUATION OF WORK: $ Z II�13O0 VALUE APPROVED $ Separate permits are required fereleebidei, plumbing, heating, vermlating or air eondhioning. Permits become null and void if wont ar construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days, or 'd work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time afterwork is commended. Time Limits on Bugding�omoletion. The e#eriarof a sWCture or portion oFa swcture, located in a residen5al lining district must be completed in aoomdance with city - TopheL mplans within 180 days after the date of perms Issusnca. Seeding. sodding or other plaided ground cover must be viable within 240 days of perm@ issuance or by July 95 rf th e 240 days expire between November 1 and kflsy 15. construction materials, induding piles of din. sand and sod must not be left in the open mote than 60 days after construction is completetl or a certificeI. of occupancy has been issued. I hereby cedifY that 1 have read antl examined this application arM know the same to be /rue and wrrect Ali provisions of laws and ordinances gemming this type of work will be complied wdh whether 5pedtiatl herein or not Th e granting W a parmft tlOes not presume to give euthodty to violate or Cancel he provisions of any Omer state orlocal law regulating mnslruction or me perfomrence of wnstruGion. 6 agree th pay aiF plan mviawf0 even ff t choose notm prooead w(m the work. i eartHy all yzttas and City fees owed fn connection wart this property am currant � SI1 f�RML P' iq PL /n J X ` P A f/ ATURE DATE PRINT APPLICANT'S NAME CAPIED APPROVED RECEIVED BY & DATE PLANS CHECKED BY PERMIT FEE PLAN REVIEW FEE ZONING CITY ENGIDPW PUBLIC WORKS ASSESSING/UTIL BILL BUILDING OFFICIAL See reverse s /de For are ffreoorlartt ferrrerrY reoardeno tnd®an ¢r1rrQ°S. Revised 2013 -Wj- .,.. Application ant f t f! • .. t - s x t Structure permit applications. A Size & spacing of footing /2, " fl6�Tlt�lyo�s or7�rw B Size & spacing of studs Ax 6/ Z /G C �a CF/vqR C Type of lumber !r A � �7-k Spy D Size of beams -X/I -/ y E Size & spacing of rafters P y " / 2 Y ` ,fA/ QWgk F Size of Structure a �( x Y&, x/� G Distance to property lines Side 1 Side 2 Rear 33:2 k 1021 i 1011 Total height l ` �� 0 4/24/2613 Page `13-32- ❑ ❑I_�f 11 ;I ii_ II_IL =1 !E111IF11111 I L�f11 11 E, 11 �1 — 4' ! 16 X8 4' — Gable Front View (1) -WHITE PREM RIP MDP38 16X8 EZSET TORS ink j 4 : 8 X 7 44' 3X2 4'•6" �1 -8X7 MADSNfGLOSS WHT. 4200ROLL -UP DOOR 1�- 36X24 VINYL SLIDER CLEAR GLASS Eave front View Building Size: 24 feet wide X 40 feet long X 10 feet high Approximate Peak Height: 18 feet 10 inches (226 inches) IJ �, 6 7-6" 3'X 2' 9' -3" 3 X 2' 9.31' (' -s Eave Back View (1� - E-1 6-PANEL STEEL DOOR PH36X80 LH DB i2 - 36X24 VINYL SLIDER CLEAR GLASS Menards provided material estimates are intended as a general construction aid and have been calculated using typical consln IjOrl methods. Because of /rte wide variable in codes and site resincfions, all final plans and material lists must be verified with your local zoning office, architect and/or builder tot building design and code compliance. Menards is a supplierol construction materials and does not assume !iadliily fordesign, engineering or the completeness of any material lists provided. Underground electrical, phone and as lines should be located and marked before your building plans are llnali�13_33_iber louse safety equipment including dust masks and sight and hearing protection t1uhng construction to ensure a positive bedding experience. z i of 4 52959 a 4�x; �. 3 31/2014 Illustration May Not Depict All Options Selected Helpful Hints for Room In Attic Garage Construction N Increased loading for the floor is in the attic room area only. # for 24" on center spacing. • � ! e en ♦ ... ! .• r "sses-ray • • "• • ! • r k tr insulation to your arage in the future. Switching to end trusses will require Menards proitided material estimates are intended as a general conslndion aid and ha«a Mean raiculaled using rypicai construction methods. Because of the wide variable in codes and site restrictions, all final plans and material lists must be verified with your Ic1334 -Ace, architect and/or builder for building design and code compliance_ klenards is a supplier of construction materials and dons not assume liability for design, engineering or the completeness of any material lists provided. Underground elecirical, phone and gas lines should be located and marked before your building plans are finalized. Remember to use safely equipment including dust masks and sight and hearing �...- =' t' � �� -� �___. i i i _._ °y' -- -- r, -1��5- I zY t i i i { i t i i _._ °y' -- -- r, -1��5- C, - 13-30- )"! Z s. it I I iJ rlr - 13-30- )"! Z s. it I I 4' 8'x 7' d' 6' 3' x 2' 4' 8° ' R �w Illustration May Not Depict All Options Selected 3'x2' _...__.___. 9,4 . . 'x2' — -- 7' -6'-- °:'x6'-8 -- - -5' _. Note: Wall construction is W @ 46" on center -lU7_ 4' 16'x8' i Q' h A nAL __, CITY 4F MOl1ND_,._ Memorandum TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: June 18, 2014 2014 Special Legislation — Mound Harbor Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District As the City Council is aware, Mound received approval of special legislation for the Mound Harbor TIF District related to the Five -Year Rule contained Minnesota Statutes Sec. 469.1763, subd. 3 which has specific requirements about revenue expenditures derived from a TIF district. Mound's new deadline for meeting the provisions of the Five Year Rule is May 5, 2018. Attached please find a resolution approving the special legislation, along with the form of certificate that must be filed with the Secretary of State (along with a certified copy of the resolution.) Members are advised that usually the school district and county must also approve the TIF legislation. However, in this case, the special legislation clearly requires only the City Council to approve the legislation. -1338- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION APPROVING MINNESOTA LAWS 2014, CHAPTER 308, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 10 WHEREAS, the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City ") and The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "Authority ") have duly established the Mound Harbor Tax Increment Financing District (the "TIF District') within the Mound Harbor Project Area (the "Mound Harbor Project Area ") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, as amended, and Sections 469.174 through 469.1794, as amended (collectively, the "TIF Act') WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Minnesota passed a special law relating to the activities to be undertaken in the TIF District and administered by the Authority; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Laws 2014, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 10 (the "Special Law ") provides that the conditions set forth in Section 469.1763, subdivision 3 of the TIF Act shall be considered met if the activities are undertaken within thirteen (13) years from the date of certification of the TIF District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivisions 2 and 3, the Special Law is effective upon approval by a majority vote of the governing body of the City and the filing of a certificate, including a copy of this resolution, in the form prescribed by the Minnesota Attorney General with the Minnesota Secretary of State; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the "City Council ") has determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its residents to approve the Special Law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Special Law is hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk/Finance Director, as the chief clerical officer of the City, is hereby authorized and directed to file the certificate and a copy of this resolution, as approved, with the Minnesota Secretary of State as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.021, subdivision 3. 3. City staff are authorized and directed to take any additional action necessary to implement the Special Law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, this 24th day of June, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1339- 445588v1 JAE MU195 -38 Mayor INSTRUCTIONS Include the chapter number in the Laws of Minnesota that is to be approved on the Certificate of Approval form and in the resolution that approves the special law. • Return the completed originally signed Certificate of Approval form with a photo copy of the resolution that approved the special law to: Election Division Secretary of State 180 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd St. Paul, MN 55155 -1299 If you have any questions, please contact Nancy Breems at 6511215 -1440. -1341- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PARTICIPATION ON THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM IN FY 2015 — 2017 WHEREAS, the City of Mound, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program, and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs; and WHEREAS, the City and County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in order to continue to qualify as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant, ESG, and HOME Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that a new Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County be executed effective October 1, 2014 and that the Mayor and the City Clerk be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council this 24'" day of June 2014 Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1342 - 1 Mark Hanus, Mayor Ms. Kandis Hanson City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Subject: Fiscal Year 2015 — 2017 Joint Cooperation Agreement/Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program — Action Needed Dear Ms. Hanson: On April 1, 2014, we sent a letter regarding your participation in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program (Urban County CDBG Program). Since then, HUD released Notice CPD -13 -04 dated April 25, 2014 which requires certain changes to the Joint Cooperation Agreement (JCA) for 2015 -2017. The attached revised 2015 -2017 JCA reflects the following changes: 1) The addition of language stating that the agreement covers not only the CDBG Entitlement program and the HOME Investment Partnership (HOME), but also the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Programs. 2) The addition of a provision that a unit of general local government may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of such funds to another such metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general local government, or Indian tribe, or insular area that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any other funds, credits or non - Federal considerations, but must use such funds for activities eligible under Title I of the Act. This new requirement is contained in the FY2014 HUD appropriation bill. 3) Clarification of Fair Housing language. In addition, we are taking this opportunity to move contract term language specific to the CDBG contract year from the JCA Section D to the annual CDBG subrecipient contracts for awards starting in FY 2015. Finally, Planning and Administrative cost language has been expanded to reflect the County's growing costs associated with compliance and timeliness monitoring and the potential need for -1343 - Art rquxlGrpo,tonityErn&yer Rs(vV_, aFe ;;er Ms. Hanson June 4, 2014 Page 2 future increases (the County has retained 13 percent since 2002; the maximum allowed by HUD is 20 percent) within the term of the JCA. These changes require a certified City resolution approving the new /amended JCA. Attached is a sample resolution for your use. Please return three signed copies of page 9 of the 2015 -2017 JCA and two certified resolutions by July 18, 2014 to: Margo Geffen Manager, Housing Development and Finance Hennepin County Housing, Community Works and Transit 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Copies of these materials, including a red -lined version of the revised 2015 -2017 JCA, were also sent to you via email. Please don't hesitate to call me at 612 -543 -1965 or Abby Shafer at 612 - 348 -2205 with any questions. Thank you for your patience with respect to the timing of this request. Sincerely, V� Margo Geffen Manager, Housing Development and Finance Enclosures cc: Abby Shafer, Hennepin County -1344- Contract No. 140805 JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," A -2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55487, and the cities executing this Master Agreement, each hereinafter respectively referred to as "COOPERATING UNIT," said parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of Minnesota, and made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59. WITNESSETH: COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens that COOPERATING UNIT shares its authority to carry out essential community development and housing activities with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY to secure and administer Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as herein defined and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that it: May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for fiscal years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program; and May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County. May not receive a formula allocation under the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program except through the Urban County. I. DEFINITIONS The definitions contained in 42 U.S.C. 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them: A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.). B. "Activity" means a CDBG - funded activity eligible under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. Example: single family rehab activity. C. "Annual Program" means those combined activities submitted by cooperating units to COUNTY for CDBG funding as part of the Consolidated Plan. D. "Consolidated Plan" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is -1345- developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the Community Development Block Grant Program. E. "Cooperating Unit(s)" means any city or town in Hennepin County that has entered into a cooperation agreement that is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County, which is a party to each Agreement. F. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. G. "Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is certified by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people. H. "Program" means the HUD Community Development Block Grant Program as defined under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. L "Program Income" means gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly generated from the use of CDBG. J. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not limited to 24 CFR Part 570. K. "Urban County" means the entitlement jurisdiction within the provisions of the Act and includes the suburban Hennepin County municipalities which are signatories to this Agreement. IL PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities and authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Programs and HOME appropriations for the Federal Fiscal Years 2015, 2016 and 2017 and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. III. AGREEMENT The initial term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1, 2014 and terminating no sooner than the end of the program year covered by the Consolidated Plan for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal Year 2017, as authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds granted to the County for such period. Prior to the end of the initial term and the end of each subsequent qualification period, the COUNTY, as the lead agency of the URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, shall provide a written notice to the COOPERATING UNIT of their right not to participate in a subsequent qualification period. The written notice will provide the COOPERATING UNIT a minimum thirty (30) day period to submit a written withdrawal. If the COOPERATING UNIT does not submit to the COUNTY a written withdrawal during the notice period, this Agreement shall be automatically extended for a subsequent three -year qualifying period. This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any future changes necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice applicable for the year in which the next qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either party to adopt -1346 - G such an amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the expenditure of all CDBG and HOME funds allocated for use in the COOPERATING UNIT's jurisdiction. This Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG, HOME and ESG funds and program income received (with respect to activities canned out during the three -year qualification period, and any successive qualification periods under agreements that provide for automatic renewals) are expended and the funded activities completed. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT cannot terminate or withdraw form this Agreement while it remains in effect. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated at the end ofthe program period during which HUD withdraws its designation of the COUNTY as an Urban County under the Act. This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the authorizing resolution and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit so that the Agreement can be submitted to HUD by July 25, 2014. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the urban county's certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Fair Housing Act, and affirmatively furthering fair housing. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall also take all actions necessary to assure compliance with Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (which incorporates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act Of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975), and other applicable laws. IV. ACTIVITIES COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out, within the terms of this Agreement, certain activities eligible for funding under the Act. The COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and /or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate the COUNTY's responsibility to assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act, including the development of the Consolidated Plan, pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91. COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows A. COOPERATING UNIT will, in accord with a COUNTY- established schedule, prepare and provide to the COUNTY, in a prescribed form, requests for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b), it is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly executed with and in a form prescribed by the COUNTY. C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements stated in paragraph B above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an activity pursuant to -1347- this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances, a written Third Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY. D. COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all funds annually allocated to activities pursuant to the Subrecipient Agreement. All funds not expended pursuant to the terms of the Subrecipient Agreement will be relinquished to the COUNTY and will be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on a competitive request for proposal basis at the discretion of the COUNTY where total of such funds is $100,000 or greater. Amounts less than $100,000 shall be allocated by COUNTY to other existing activities consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals. E. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all program income pursuant to this Agreement as provided below: 1. Program income from housing rehabilitation activities administered by the COUNTY will be incorporated into a pool at the discretion of the COUNTY. The pool will be administered by COUNTY and will be used for housing rehabilitation projects located throughout the entire Urban County. When possible, COUNTY will give priority to funding housing rehabilitation projects within the COOPERATING UNIT where the program income was generated. Funds expended in this manner would be secured by a Repayment Agreement/Mortgage running in favor of the COUNTY. Program income generated by certain COOPERATING UNITS that administer their own housing rehabilitation activities may be retained by the COOPERATING UNIT at its discretion; however, such COOPERATING UNITS will be bound by the conditions of D.2., above. Only COOPERATING UNITS that were administering their own activities pursuant to the Joint Cooperation Agreement pertaining to the HUD fiscal years 2012 -2014 will be eligible to retain their program income. COUNTY reserves the option to recapture program income generated by non - housing rehabilitation activities if said funds have not been expended within twelve (12) months of being generated. These funds shall be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on a competitive request for proposal basis administered by COUNTY or, where the total of such funds does not exceed $100,000, shall be reallocated by COUNTY to other existing activities consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals. F. COOPERATING UNITS are encouraged to undertake joint activities involving the sharing of funding when such action furthers the goals of the Consolidated Plan and meets the expenditure goals. G. If COUNTY is notified by HUD that it has not met the performance standard for the timely expenditure of funds at 24 CFR 570.902(a) and the COUNTY entitlement grant is reduced by HUD according to its policy on corrective actions, then the basic grant amount to any COOPERATING UNIT that has not met its expenditure goal shall be reduced accordingly. H. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to assist in accomplishing the community development program and housing goals, as contained in the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. 1. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all activities funded, in part or in full by grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement, shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing, employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall, in implementing all programs and /or -134p- activities funded by the basic grant amount, comply with all applicable Federal and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY. J. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair-housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be prohibited from receiving CDBG funding for any activities. K. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process, as established by COUNTY, in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. L. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY for any expenditure determined by HUD or COUNTY to be ineligible. M. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY. N. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. O. COOPERATING UNIT shall not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of grant funds to another metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general local government, or Indian tribe, or insular area that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any other funds, credits or non- Federal considerations, but must use such funds for activities eligible under Title I of the Act. COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows: A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies, on an annual basis, all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount under the Act. B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of a request for funding. C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY in fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program and housing goals. D. COUNTY shall, upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer local housing rehabilitation activities funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall receive Twelve percent (12 %) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity. -1349- E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer, for a possible fee, other activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. F. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration, develop and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, HUD administrative directives, and administrative requirements of COUNTY. V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as follows A. Planning and administration costs are capped to 20 percent of the sum of grant plus program income that is received during the program year. During the term of this Agreement the COUNTY anticipates planning and administrative retainage of thirteen to fifteen percent (13 -15 %);included in this administrative amount is funding for annual county -wide Fair Housing activities. B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be made available by COUNTY to COOPERATING UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C and the procedure stated in part D of this section utilizing U.S. Census Bureau data. The allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding. C. Allocation of funding will be based upon a formula using U.S. Census Bureau data that bears the same ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between: I . The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING UNITS. 2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all COOPERATING UNITS. 3. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS. 4. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the extent of poverty shall be counted twice. D. Funds will be made available to communities utilizing the formula specified in C of this Section in the following manner: I. All COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of greater than three and one half percent (3.5 %) of the total using the procedure in part C. of this section will receive funding allocations in accordance with the COUNTY formula allocations. 2. COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of three and one half percent (3.5 %) or less of the total using the procedure in part C. of this section will have their funds consolidated into a pool for award in a manner determined by COUNTY on a competitive request for proposal basis. Only the COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS whose funding has been pooled will be eligible to compete for these funds. 1350- E. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data furnished by HUD. F. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request a funding allocation, or a portion thereof, the amount not requested shall be made available to other participating communities, in a manner determined by COUNTY. VI. METROPOLITAN CITIES Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of Urban Hennepin County. This agreement can be voided if the COOPERATING UNIT is advised by HUD, prior to the completion of the re- qualification process for fiscal years 2015 -2017, that it is eligible to become a metropolitan city and the COOPERATING UNIT elects to take its entitlement status. If the agreement is not voided on the basis of the COOPERATING UNIT's eligibility as a metropolitan city prior to June 20, 2014, the COOPERATING UNIT must remain a part of the COUNTY program for the entire three -year period of the COUNTY qualification. VIL OPINION OF COUNSEL The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement, hereby opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that the COOPERATING UNIT has full legal authority to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly - assisted housing. Assistant County Attorney -13�1- VIII. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on 2014, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement, the COUNTY agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. APPROVED AS TO FORM: Assistant County Attorney COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA go And: Chair of its County Board Date: Assistant/Deputy /County Administrator Attest: Deputy /Clerk of the County Board RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Assistant County Administrator - Public Works Date: Department, Housing, Community Works and Transit Date: -1352- IX. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing body having duly approved this Agreement on 2014, and pursuant to such approval and the proper city official having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Joint Cooperation Agreement. CITY OF By: Its Mayor And: Its City Manager ATTEST: CITY MUST CHECK ONE: The City is organized pursuant to: — Plan A — Plan B — Charter -1353- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Date: June 24, 2014 Subject: Purchase of Vac Truck for Public Works The City owns a 1995 Ford vac -jet truck which is used to clean out storm sewers, catch basins and sanitary sewers. In recent years the truck has been very costly to maintain and keep it serviceable. Recent usage caused more serious failures and are not recommended to be repaired. The truck has outlived its useful life and staff recommends replacement with a new truck. Over the last several months staff has met with five local representatives of the various vac —jet truck companies and has narrowed the proposals down to one that will meet the immediate and long term needs of the city. We contacted five vendors originally, GapVax through Infratech, Aquatech and Camel through Flexible Pipe, Vactor through MacQueen Equipment, and Vac -Con through ABM Equipment. It was determined right at the start of the process that a PD (positive displacement vacuum ) was not the type of vacuum we wanted on a Vac - Truck. One reason was the cost and second the amount of daily maintenance on that type of unit is double or triple that of a fan vacuum unit. That narrowed it down to two vendors that offer fan vacuum units, MacQueen and ABM. We had both vendors in for multiple demonstrations of the equipment they had to offer. In the end we choose to go with the Vac -Con offered by ABM Equipment. This decision was based on the following, ABM offered a three stage fan vacuum unit. MacQueen only offers a two stage fan unit. The three stage fan offers better performance in deeper lift station wet wells. Second, the operators preferred the water pump used for jetting offered by Vac -Con. It is a duel head pump vs. the single piston pump offered by MacQueen. The single piston pump jerks when jetting and the operators said this was hard on their elbows. Attached is the quote from ABM on a truck already built to the specifications we are looking for and currently sitting in Chicago as a demo truck. In addition we currently we have a rental unit from ABM at a cost of $6,000 per month. The attached quote shows the original cost of the new truck, offers a demo discount but gives the City a full warranty as if new, shows a down payment number, and a final cost for the truck. I would like to recommend we purchase this already built truck from ABM for a couple of reason's; first the return on investment by using $50,000 dollars as a down payment on a new truck vs. using that money on a rental that was offering 80% of the rental dollars towards the purchase of a new truck with the balance due in January of 2015. Second we would not have to go through the process of ordering and then waiting 6 -9 months for the truck to be built and delivered. Public works is in need of a working truck right now. We have a rental truck on site however that truck has broken down a couple of times. ABM has assured me that if we place the order for the already built truck we will not have to pay any rental fees on the rental truck. -1354- The City would be charged a finance fee of 3.64% for six months until the balance of $294,000 would be due in January 2015. Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the purchase of the vac -truck from ABM Equipment & Supply Company in the amount of $344,062.00. ® Page 2 -1355- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 14- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A SEWER VAC TRUCK FOR PUBLIC WORKS WHEREAS, the City owns a 1995 vac -jet truck that has been very costly to maintain and is considered to be beyond repair as it cannot meet MnDOT regulations for safety; and WHEREAS, Management arranged to rent a vac -jet truck that has proven unreliable; and WHEREAS, Management worked with prospective vendors on the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Vendor Contract #74584 to create the required specifications; and WHEREAS, Management determined that ABM Equipment & Supply's proposal for a 2014 Vac -Con Sewer Cleaner met the required specifications and at a cost of $344,062.00, not including any applicable taxes, is the most desirable and cost effective unit available; and WHEREAS, this expenditure was built into the preliminary 2015 capital budget assumptions reviewed by the Council as part of the 2014 budget approval; and WHEREAS, recent exceptional rain events in the City of Mound has further increased the urgency for this purchase; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into a contract to purchase a sewer vac truck from ABM Equipment & Supply as shown in Attachment A and made a part herein. Adopted by the City Council this 24th day of June, 2014 Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -1356- A 333 333 2nd Street NE Quote / Order # 060314 -187 Page 1 D Hopkins, MN 55343 -8337 Date Issued: 06/03/14 952. 938 -5451 Quote Expires On: Fax: 952. 938.0159 Salesman: S. Reierson www.abm- highway.com Custom Truck Equipment For The Utility Construction Municipal And Refuse Industries City of Mound Terms: 5341 Maywood Rd PO #: Mound, MN 55364 Phone: 2.2 Fax: Attn: Ray E -mail: Any warranties on the products sold hereby are those of the manufacturer. As between this retail seller and buyer, all products are sold in an AS IS condition. The entire risk as the quality of the product is with the buyer. Seller does expressly refrain from making any representation or warranties and does hereby disclaim any and all warranties, express or implied. Including any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, whether arising from statute, common law, custom or otherwise. The remedy set forth in this agreement shall be the exclusive remedy avallable to any person. No person has the authority to bind the seller to any representation or warranty other than this disclaimer. This disclaimer by this seller in noway affects the terms of the manufacturer's warranty. The seller shall not be liable for any consequential damages resulling from the use of this product or caused by any defect, failure or malfunction of any product, whether a claim for such damage is based upon warranty, contract, negllgence or othervse. The seller shall not be liable for any loss of profit, wages, earnings, employment, contracts or otherwise. The buyer acknowledges being Informed of the above disclaimer prior to sale, Acceptance Signature: Print Name: Date: Seller Acceptance: -1357 - Attachment A Page 1 of 3 2014 Vac -Con Sewer Cleaner Per State Of Minnesota Contract # 74584 1.0 Price for Base Unit $143,334.00 2.2 11 cubic yard on tandem axle chassis $13,790.00 2.4 Automatic debris body washout system $1,701.00 3.2 Level indicator Standard 3.3 Automatic Vacuum Breaker - The automatic vacuum breaker assembly is located inside the body. A full indication activates an automatic vacuum breaker shut down system that completely shuts down 100% of the airflow to the vacuum system to prevent body overfilling and wastewater discharge into the atmosphere. The vacuum breaker system is automatically activated (closed) when the parking brake system is released to eliminate carryover during transit. The system is also controlled, activated, at the front hose reel control station and pendant control. This feature enables the operator to pick up large debris with boom and place debris on the road surface. This system is used for safety in the event suction must be shut off in case of an emergency. Standard 3.4 3 Stage Vacuum Compressor - A maximum of 27" diameter and of 3 -stage construction (i.e. 3 -27" minimum diameter fans in tandem). System is capable of vacuuming under water 16.5'(200") without speclal attachments and a maximum of 8000 cfm. A centrifugal separator located in the inlet chamber to the fans without clean out box is provided. The separator removes particles from the air stream, thus enabling the unit to vacuum wet or dry material. The separator is separate from the debris body. Centrifugal compressor fans have a five -year non pro -rated replacement warranty. $8,557.00 3.5 Compressor Fan - Flush out system $1,054.00 3.7 Hydrostatic blower drive $8,557.00 4.2 10' telescoping $12,000.00 4.5 8" x 6' aluminum pipe extension, spare $280.00 4.8 8" adjustable air gap (for underwater vacuuming) $364.00 4.9 Pick up tube clamps (3 @ $34 ea) $102.00 4.10 Wireless remote system $4,071.00 4.11 Omni Bus System $3,344.00 4.12 Ommni Bus Footage Counter $1,467.00 Any warranties on the products sold hereby are those of the manufacturer. As between this retail seller and buyer, all products are sold in an AS IS condition. The entire risk as the quality of the product is with the buyer. Seller does expressly refrain from making any representation or warranties and does hereby disclaim any and all warranties, express or implied. Including any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, whether arising from statute, common law, custom or otherwise. The remedy set forth in this agreement shall be the exclusive remedy avallable to any person. No person has the authority to bind the seller to any representation or warranty other than this disclaimer. This disclaimer by this seller in noway affects the terms of the manufacturer's warranty. The seller shall not be liable for any consequential damages resulling from the use of this product or caused by any defect, failure or malfunction of any product, whether a claim for such damage is based upon warranty, contract, negllgence or othervse. The seller shall not be liable for any loss of profit, wages, earnings, employment, contracts or otherwise. The buyer acknowledges being Informed of the above disclaimer prior to sale, Acceptance Signature: Print Name: Date: Seller Acceptance: -1357 - Attachment A Page 1 of 3 333 2nd Street NE 50 gpm /3000 psi Quote / Order # 060314 -187 Page 2 6.1 D Hopkins, MN 55343.8337 Date Issued: 06/03/14 means of a double chain and sprocket drive. The controls for operating the motor have a flow ® 952- 938 -5451 6.1 Quote Expires On: Fax: 952- 938 -0169 behind a steel housing to protect operator from hdyraulic oil if a hose fails. The hose reel will Salesman: S. Reierson • • - • • www.abm- highway.com flexability in truck placement for man holes located in tough areas and provides greater safety to Custom Truck Equipment For The Utility Construction Municipal And Refuse Industries the operator. $11,858.00 6.5 City of Mound Standard Terms: Power assisted level wind 5341 Maywood Rd 7.2 PO #: $4,223.00 Mound, MN 55364 Hand gun hose reel (50' capacity with 50' hose) Phone: 7.22 Water pump remote oil drain $239.00 Fax: Driver side water sight gauge Attn: Ray 8.5 E -mail: 5.2 50 gpm /3000 psi No Charge 6.1 180 Degree Articulating Hose Reel - The hose reel is hydraulically powered in both directions by means of a double chain and sprocket drive. The controls for operating the motor have a flow 6.1 control device to regulate the rotational speed of the reel in both directions, All hydraulic hoses are behind a steel housing to protect operator from hdyraulic oil if a hose fails. The hose reel will articulate 180 allowing operator to work in any position through this arc. This allows greater flexability in truck placement for man holes located in tough areas and provides greater safety to the operator. $11,858.00 6.5 Footage counter Standard 6.8 Power assisted level wind $3,250.00 7.2 Upgrade to 1300 gallons (tandem axle units only) $4,223.00 7.6 Hand gun hose reel (50' capacity with 50' hose) $1,797.00 7.22 Water pump remote oil drain $239.00 7.24 Driver side water sight gauge $162.00 8.5 Add for 1) 16" x 42" x 96" storage box behind cab (for tandem axle units with 850 or 1000 gallons of water only) (2 @ $2091 ea) 8.7 Dry decking for 16" x 42" x 72" or 36" storage boxes each $467.00 8.8 Dual roll -out shelves $1,399.00 9.1 Hydraulic rear door opener (removes grabber) $3,311.00 9.3 6" knife valve in lieu of 5" butterfly valve (rear) $642.00 9.10 Air purge system $733.00 9.15 Variable flow valve $377.00 9.18 Lary Susan style pipe rack (holds 5 pipe) $2,433.00 925 Strobe light, rear $610.00 9.28 Arrowboard - LED $2,186.00 9.29 Arrowstick - LED $2,263.00 9.30 4) strobes, 2 rear stop /turn/tail lights, 2 front turn signals (LED) - mounted in bumpers $1,674.00 Any warranties on the products sold hereby are those of the manufacturer. As between this retail seller and buyer, all products are sold in an AS IS condition. The entire risk as the quality of the product is with the buyer. Seller does expressly refrain from making any representation or warranties and does hereby disclaim any and all warranties, express or Implied. Including arty Implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, whether arising from statute, common law, custom a otherwise. The remedy set forth In this agreement shall be the exclusive remedy avallable to any person. No person has the authority to bind the seller to any representation or warranty other than this disclaimer. This disclaimer by this seller in no way affects the terms of the manufacturers warranty. The seller shall not be liable for any consequential damages resulting from the use of this product or caused by any defect, failure or malfunction of any product, whether a claim for such damage Is based upon warranty, contract, negligence or otherwise. The seller shall not be liable for any loss of profit, wages, earnings, employment, contracts or otherwise. The buyer acknowledges being Informed of the above disclaimer prior to sale. Acceptance Signature: Print Name: Date: Seller Acceptance: -1358- Attachment A Page 2 of 3 333 2nd Street NE LED boom mounted flood lights (2) Quote / Order# 060314 -187 Page 3 ® ® Hopkins, MN 55343 -8337 $725.00 Date Issued: 06/03114 ICC - Body LED lighting package ® 952 - 938 -6451 9.44 Quote Expires On: $239.00 Fax: 952- 938 -0159 4 -way pendant control station Salesman: S. Reierson 9.60 t • www.abm- higtTway.com $5,193.00 9.61 Hose guide, spare Custom Truck Equipmenf For The Utility, Construction, Municipal And Refuse Industries City of Mound Manhole cover lifting hook Terms: 9.65 5341 Maywood Rd $309.00 PO #: Remote grease zerks for telescoping boom Mound, MN 55364 9.68 Phone: $2,256.00 9.72 First aid kit Fax: 9.73 Attn: Ray $85.00 E -mail: Grease gun 9.39 LED boom mounted flood lights (2) $725.00 9.40 LED rear mounted flood lights (2) $725.00 9.43 ICC - Body LED lighting package $1,386.00 9.44 Electronic backup alarm $239.00 9.55 4 -way pendant control station $447.00 9.60 Hydroexcavation package, 50' hand gun reel, 3000 psi capacity with unloader valve and hand wand $5,193.00 9.61 Hose guide, spare $157.00 9.64 Manhole cover lifting hook $95.00 9.65 Rear mounted tow hooks $309.00 9.67 Remote grease zerks for telescoping boom $2,092.00 9.68 Remote grease zerks for debris tank (excludes rollers and cams) $2,256.00 9.72 First aid kit $85.00 9.73 Triangle kit $85.00 9.75 Grease gun $70.00 9.78 15' leader hose $354.00 9.81 Reflective striping: black, orange, yellow, green, light blue, red (circle color) $603,00 9.85 No paint on hoses or wires Standard 9.86 Vacuum enhancer / silencer $4,206.00 9.88 600'x 3/4" jet hose on reel ilo 400'(3000[7500) $780,00 12.4 60,000 GVVVR Freightliner 114SD, 370 HP, Auto $94,800.00 0.0 Plastic engraved decals $1,500.00 0.0 Backup color camera system $1,528.00 Sub Total 1 $358,062.00 Allowance I - $14,000.00 Pre Payment - $50,000.00 TOTAL 1, $294,062.00 DO NOT INCLUDE Any warranties on the products sold hereby are those of the manufacturer. As between this retail seller and buyer, all products are sold in an AS IS condition. The entire risk as the quality of the product is with the buyer. Seller does expressly refrain from making any representation or warranties and does hereby disclaim any and all warranties, express or Implied. Including any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, whether arising from statute, common law, custom or otherwise. The remedy set forth in this agreement shall be the exclusive remedy available to any person. No person has the authority to bind the seller to any representation or warranty other than this disclaimer. This disclaimer by this seller In no way affects the terms of the manufacturers warranty. The seller shall not be liable for any consequential damages resulting from the use of this product or caused by any defect, failure or malfunction of any product, whether a claim for such damage Is based upon warranty, contract, negligence or otherwise. The seller, shall not be liable for any loss of profit, wages, earnings, employment, contracts or otherwise. The buyer acknowledges being Informed of the above disclaimer prior to sale. Acceptance Signature Print Name: Date: Seller Acceptance: -1359 - Attachment A Page 3 of 3 CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A LIQUOR LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT WHEREAS, The City of Mound operates a municipal liquor store; and WHEREAS, florescent lighting is being more costly and less available; and WHEREAS, management recommends upgrading beer cooler door lighting from florescent to a more cost - efficient LED system; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost not to exceed of $7,500 will be offset partially by savings in electric utilities expense and rebates available from XCEL Energy; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby authorizes the City Manager to upgrade the municipal liquor store cooler lighting to florescent to LED. Adopted by the City Council this 24`h day of June, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1360- Mayor Mark Hanus 2135 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 952.472.0648 To: Mayor Mark Hanus City Council Members, Mound Kandis Hanson, City Manager From: John Colotti, Harbor Wine & Spirits Store Manager Date: June 17`", 2014 Subject:LED Refrigerated Display Lighting Upgrade Project Description or Issue: the liquor store is in current need of upgrading its existing florescent beer cooler door lighting to a more cost - efficient, high- efficiency LED system. Background Information: Harbor Wine and Spirits ended construction in February of 2003, and was built with a 23 door beer cooler fitted with a florescent lighting system. In the past, I have purchased individual replacement bulbs from Mound True Value Hardware when needed. However, the price has risen to over $17 per bulb, and must be purchased by the 24 unit case. Florescent lighting of this type is rapidly becoming obsolete, and difficult to find. The city's main lighting vendor, Border States Lighting, no longer stocks bulbs of this type. Recommendation: Convert existing florescent system to the General Electric "Immersion" LED Refrigerated Display Lighting System. This system is rated to perform up to 50,000 hours, while using up to 22% less energy. I have received a bid from R.C. Electric to install the system for $7360.00, labor and parts included. XCEL Energy also has a $100.00 per door rebate available upon completion. Final cost breakdown would total $5060.00. - 1361 -A I would greatly appreciate your attention and consideration to this matter. Respectfully submitted, VA 10 n Colotti Store Manager Harbor Wine & Spirits ow 6 GE Lighting LED Refrigerated Displag Lighting Vertical Cases RV60 Series Center Mullion Lights 48- inch:GELT604850CTR- SY / -S6 ( 85742 /85745),GELT60484OCTR- SY / -SB( 85748 / 85751), GELT604835CTR- SY/- SB(85754/85757) 60- inch: GELT606050CTR- SY / -SB( 85699 /85702),GELT60604OCTR- SY / -SB( 85705 / 85708), GELT606035CTR- SY /- SB(85711/85714) 67- inch:GELT606750CTR- SY / -S8 ( 85717 /85722),GELT606740CTR- SY / -S6 ( 85725 / 857281, GELT6C6735CTR- 5Y/- S8(85736/85739) Description Code (Single Unit Product Number /10 -Pack Product Number) .. BEFORE YOU BEGIN Read these instructions completely and carefully. FOR YOUR SAFETY Read and observe all CAUTIONS and WARNINGS shown throughout these instructions. • Installation to be performed by factory trained service personnel only. • For use inside a commercial refrigeration case with packaged foods only. • Use this unit only in the manner intended by the manufacturer. If you have any questions, contact the manufacturer. • Before installing, servicing or cleaning unit, switch power off at the service panel and follow appropriate S-:k ouUtog cut safety procedures This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) This device may not cause harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation. NOTE: This equipment has been tested and found to comply with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant tc can 15 of the FCC Rules. These limits are designed to provide reasonable protection against harmful interference when the equipment is operated in a commercial environment. This equipment generates, uses, and can radiate radio frequency energy and, if not installed and used in accordance with the instruction manual, may cause harmful interference to radio communications. Operation of this equipment in a residential area is likely to cause harmful interference in which case the user will be required to correct the interference at his own expense. 0 imagination at work PREPARE ELECTRICAL WIRING Electrical Requirements • The power supply must be supplied with 100 -240 VAC, 50/60 Hz, and connected to an individual properly grounded branch circuit, protected by a 15 or 20 ampere circuit breaker or time delay fuse. • Wring must be 2 wire with ground and rated for 75 °C(167•Fl. • Do not overload driver, follow installation instructions for the GEPS6000NCMUL -SY or GEP5650ONCMU L -SY. • Ensure that all connection points are sealed for damp location using the appropriate method per the NEC or local electrical code. LED DRIVER COMPATIBILITY This system is compatible with GEPS6000NCMUL -SY or GEPS650ONCMUL -SY LED Driver. Please refer to the separate LED driver installation guide for appropriate wiring connections. CAUTION /ATTENTION ffofinjury. While performing installations described, gloves, sa fety les should be worn. / Risque de blessure. Lars de nstallations decrites, des gants, des lunettes de securite de protection doivent titre portees. WARN I NG /AVE RTISSE M ENT Risk of electrical shock. Disconnect power before servicing or instolling product. / Risque de choc electrique. Cooper le courant avant de reparer ou installer le produit. -1362- For Immediate Release — Date: July 19, 2014 From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager KandisHanson @cityofmound.com 952- 240 -5244 Mound, MN – The City of Mound is once again in emergency mode. Torrential rains have the sewer system backing up at the Grandview lift station and the Sulgrove lift station, which is owned by MCES. At this time there are five trucks that have been called in by city staff that are pumping and trucking from the locations presenting the most risk. Houses that backed up with sewer during the last event are at risk of experiencing backup again. Some people are asking for sand bags for flooding but we do not have that to offer at this time. An appeal for sandbags has been made of Hennepin County Emergency Management. The notification system is being built but depends upon attaining the contact information, so communication other than from this web site is not a possibility at this time. Please call Amy at 952 - 472 -0603 or email her your email and phone numbers at AmyStark @cityofmound.com to be added to the new notification system— GovDelivery. The City is in the midst of coordinating a workshop with MCES. The public is invited to observe at a meeting set for Weds, July 2. The purpose of the meeting is to work out issues related to the Mound sewer system and the MCES sewer system as it affects the Mound system. Representatives of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services will be present. Please see this site for as to the time of the workshop. -1363- M NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Mound City Council will hold a special meeting workshop on Wednesday, July 2, 2014, at 6:30 pm, in the Mound City Council Chambers located within the Centennial Building at 5341 Maywood Road in Mound. The purpose of the meeting is to work out issues related to the Mound sewer system and the MCES sewer system as it affects the Mound system. Representatives of the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services will be present. Catherine Pausche City Clerk Posted 6119/14 -1364- Kandis Hanson Subject: FW: High Water Update: 6 -19 -14 Attachments: 2014 Lake Minnetonka level prediction- 6- 19- 14.pdf Importance: High From: Telly Mamayek [ mailto :TMamayek @minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 1:07 PM To: Telly Mamayek Subject: High Water Update: 6 -19 -14 Importance: High Current Conditions The wettest Twin Cities spring on record has caused historically high water levels on lakes and streams across the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Record rainfall on Thursday, June 19 caused Lake Minnetonka's water level to reach an all -time high of 930.77 feet above sea level, an increase of 2.88 inches since the previous reading on Wednesday, June 18, breaking the previous record of 930.66 feet set on June 3, 2014. Per the operating plan for the Gray's Bay Dam, the District is discharging water at a rate of 300 cubic feet per second (cfs) and additional water is flowing over the spillway north of the dam at an estimated rate of 346 cfs. The amount of water being released at the dam is comparable to what would have been flowing over the fixed weir that was on the site before the dam was constructed in 1979, a scenario which is accounted for in the operating plan. Due to the record rainfall this spring, the volume of water in the system has exceeded the Gray's Bay Dam's capacity to manage water levels on both the lake and creek. For more on 2014 dam operations, see below. According to the USGS gauge at Hiawatha Avenue in Minneapolis, Minnehaha Creek's water level rose to 17.64 feet on June 19, an increase of 1.5 feet since before the most recent rainfall. The June 19 reading is the highest level recorded since that gauge was installed in 2006. For the latest information on lake and creek levels, visit www.minnehahacreek.ore According to the National Weather Service, another 1 to 3 inches of new rainfall is expected Thursday afternoon and evening. With the lake and creek at flood levels, any additional rain increases the likelihood of additional flooding. Road Closures /Sandbags There are reports of numerous road closings across the District due to high water and debris. Do not drive into flooded areas — if you can't see the road you cannot be sure the road is still completely intact. Many cities within the MCWD are offering sandbags to residents affected by flooding. Contact your city for more information. Water Level Projections According to the National Weather Service, it is the wettest spring on record in the Twin Cities. As a result, water levels are expected to remain high for some time. The District's engineer, Wenck Associates, has developed a new report estimating how long it may take to lower the Lake Minnetonka level to the Ordinary High Water Level (OHW) of 929.40 given normal precipitation events. Assuming normal weather conditions for the rest of the season, the District's engineer now estimates Lake Minnetonka would not reach a normal goal elevation until the end of July. See attached graph for details. Minimum wake restrictions -1365- The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's Emergency High Water Declaration, which imposes minimum wake restrictions on all of Lake Minnetonka, remains in effect. For more information, visit www,lmcd.org. Be safe around high water Residents are urged to use caution around high water. Lakes and streams across the District are hazardous due to high water, swift currents, debris, impassable bridges and other dangers. Here are some flood safety tips from Hennepin County Emergency Management: 1. Do not walk through moving water. 2. Six inches of moving water can make you fall. If you have to walk in water, walk where the water is not moving. 3. Do not drive into flooded areas — if you can't see the road you cannot be sure the road is still completely intact. Disposing of AIS that washes ashore The high water means more debris washing up on shore, which for some lakes and streams will include aquatic invasive species like zebra mussels or Eurasian watermilfoil. Please be careful in disposing of these harmful plants and animals to make sure you don't spread them elsewhere. Options for disposal: • Compost. The heat generated by the composting process kills zebra mussels and will break down milfoil and other aquatic plants • Take to a yard waste facility. Transporting AIS requires a permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. You can apply online. • Toss in the trash. Contact your garbage hauler and ask if they are permitted to transport aquatic invasive species in Minnesota 2014 Dam Operations Prior to ice out this year, the District assessed the lake level and determined there was sufficient capacity in the lake for the spring snow melt. After ice out, the lake level was approximately % foot below the top of the weir and the dam was opened according to the operating plan. Staff increased the discharge rate as the lake level increased, in accordance with the plan, and has been discharging water at 300 cubic feet per second (cfs) since May 9 when the lake went above 930 feet for the first time this season. This rate is considered maximum capacity for Minnehaha Creek. In spite of bouts of heavy rain throughout the month of May, the District was able to effectively manage water levels according to the plan. However, the record - setting rain we received on May 31 and June 1 exceeded the capacity of the system and flooding resulted on both the lake and the creek which has persisted throughout the month of June. Learn more about the Gray's Bay Dam Operating plan here. Telly Mamayek ) ) Communications Director Minnehaho Creek Watershed District Direct 952.641.4508 11 Cell 952.594.5672 15320 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55345 www.minnehahacreek.ora -1366- Record rainfall causes high water across MCWD I MCWD: Min... Page 1 of 2 MCWD STAFF CONTACT(S) Telly Mamayek Communications Director E -mail (952)641 -0588 ABOUT MCWD Vision and History Boats of Managers District Office Stag Programs Committees, Task Forces & Commissions Newsroom Comprehensive Plan Publications District Finances Employment CONNECT WITH US s r Record rainfall causes high water across MCWD Water levels are expected to remain high for some time Tuesday, June 17, 2014 Record - setting rains this spring have Caused historically high water levels on lakes and streams across the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. On Tuesday, June 17, Lake Minnetonka's water level was 930.55 feet above sea level, which is 1.3 inches below the record high of 930.66 set on Tuesday, June 3. Per the operating plan for the Gray's Bay Dam, the District is discharging water at a rate of 300 cubic feet per second (cfs) and additional water is flowing over the spillway north of the dam at an estimated rate of 215 Cie. Due to the record rainfall we've received in recent weeks the amount of water in the system has exceeded the dam's capacity to manage water levels on both the lake and creek. The amount of water being released is comparable to what would have been flowing over the fixed weir that was on the site before the dam was constructed in 1979, a scenario which is accounted for in the operating plan. For more on 2014 dam operations, see below. According to the National Weather Service there is a chance of showers and thunderstorms through the rest of the week with up to two inches of new rainfall possible through Friday morning. With the fake and creek at flood levels, any additional rain increases the likelihood of additional flooding. Due to the volume of the water that remains in the system, levels are expected to remain high for some time. The District's engineer, Wenck Associates, has developed a report estimating how long it may take to lower the Lake Minnetonka level to the Ordinary High ................_......_.. Water Level (OHW) of 929.40 given normal precipitation events. Assuming normal ................. weather conditions for the rest of the season, the District's engineer estimates Lake Minnetonka would not reach a normal goal elevation until early to mid -July. Refer to this graph for more details. The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's Emergency High Water Declaration, which imposes minimum wake restrictions on all of Lake Minnetonka, remains in effect. For more information, visit wwwJmcd.org. Residents are urged to use caution around high water. Lakes and streams across the District are hazardous due to high water, swift currents, debris, impassable bridges and other dangers. Here are some flood safety tips from Hennepin County Emergency Management: 1. Do not walk through moving water. 2. Six inches of moving water Can make you fall. If you have to walk in water, walk where the water is not moving. 3. Do not drive into flooded areas — if you Can't see the road you cannot be sure the road is still completely intact. MCWD is continuing to coordinate with the Hennepin County Emergency Management staff meteorologist and local communities to alert residents of rising lake and creek levels. For the latest on water levels in the MCWD, visit the District's website www.minnehahacreek.org. 2014 Dam Operations Prior to ice out this year, the District assessed the lake level and determined there was sufficient Capacity in the lake for the spring snow melt. After ice out, the lake level was approximately % foot below the top of the weir and the dam was opened according to the operating plan. Staff increased the discharge rate as the lake level increased, in accordance with the plan, and has been discharging water at 300 cubic feet per second (cfs) since May 9 when the lake went above 930 feet for the first time this -1367- http: / /www.minnehahacreek.org /press - release /record - rainfall- cau... 6/18/2014 Record rainfall causes high water across MCWD j MCWD: Min... Page 2 of 2 season. This rate is considered maximum capacity for Minnehaha Creek. In spite of bouts of heavy rain throughout the month of May, the District was able to effectively manage water levels according to the plan. However, the record- setting rain we received on May 31 and June i exceeded the capacity of the system and flooding resulted on both the lake and the creek. Learn more about the Gray's Bay Dam Operating plan here. -1368- http: / /www.minnehahacreek. org/press- release /record - rainfall- cau... 6/18/2014 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472 -0620 WEB. www.cityofmound.com MEMO DATE: June 10, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus & City Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mane' RE: Sewer water bypass event /�/ On Saturday and Sunday this past weekend our area experienced an unusually large amount of rainfall. By one source — 7.2 inches. • This caused the sanitary sewer service to approach its full capacity. • This created the possibility that sewage could have backed up into nearly 1,000 homes in Mound. Quick action by city staff prevented most of the potential sewer back up. • After trying a variety of methods to take water out of the system, we determined the only safe solution was to bypass the system and release grey water into area lakes. • The alternative was to allow it to backup into homes and businesses. • By quickly gaining permission from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to release grey water into local lakes, we were able to save hundreds of homes and businesses from possibly catastrophic damage. • This is viewed as a good thing for Mound residents. Unfortunately, some homes did sustain sewer backups and we are working with those owners. As of today, 34 households have reported sewer backup and 11 have filed claims with the City. Claim forms are available for those who want one. They must be completed and returned to the City for processing. However, providing this claim form does in no way imply commitment on the part of the City for payment or other liability. -1369- printed Op repycled paper Current status The current issues on area lakes stem more from high water than contamination. • Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has instituted Emergency High Water Conditions - -No wake rules are in effect on the entire lake • A swim advisory is in place from the MN Department of Health until testing can confirm the safety of the water. • At the direction of the MPCA and MHD, the City has been testing the six bypass locations. Test results to date have 3 locations testing at acceptable levels of e coli and the 3 remaining site are requiring more time to clear. Cattails in the final three areas have slowed the process, although cattails are known filter systems. • Because of the good test results, the City is asking that the advisory be limited to just the areas near Mound or that it be lifted completely. Also —to keep in mind that it is just that —an advisory. I would swim in the lake. o Clarification: Hennepin County has jurisdiction over beaches and has directed that all beaches in Mound be open. Beach closings for e coli were separate from this event. Short term: We could have another extraordinary amount of rain. If we were to have the same issues tomorrow, we would likely do the same thing rather than risk mass sewer backups into homes. We would use the method again because we know that it works. Long term: We have been working on long term solutions to prevent this kind of problem over the recent 10 years. Further improvements will involve significant repairs to all of the sewer systems serving the city. • Slip- lining • New piping = $100,000 annually • Lift stations =$3- 400,000 x 15 • Private line slip - lining = by private property owners • Sump -pump evaluations =pre2000 and 2005 -6 • Evaluation of down spouts connections = now Communications: The City is evaluating notification systems, including combining with the school notification system. 1370- Sewage Stinks I A Lake Manager's Notebook A Lake Manager's Notebook Stories, Essays, Guidaroa and f esolsJln• Ma ..Wing Lakes Honk AUM'T !.BOUT THE AUTHOR CONTACT PIALWA ❑OY..S' Pagel of 3 Sewage Stinks REC.FM' POSI'9 R Ii C;S &'C POS'f5 Recent headlines about the City of Mound releasing sewage into lake Sewage Stinks Minnetonka sent shivers to our community of lake lovers. Sewage in lakes so'aga Snaky - What Cbo Yon Do? -that stinks! What Can you Do? Publlo Lduwti,c Public l?docation Bubha's ceapPySMi g But what is the real extent of this problem? j,ctts put soma perspective on his. > Bubbr's Cmppy 9wh)g What We Don't Know � What We Uon't 16)owAbout siS About AIS Prevention- Due toheavy Gains ovenvhalming the City of Mound's sevrage, collection Prevention - Then Whnt Should We Do? Then What Should We Do? system, some untreated wastewater bypassed the treatment system and was discharged (after filtration) into the City's storm sewers, which in turn empty into area lakes, including Lake Minnetonka. This occurred for Iil<'hNT CpNAt li3^,'P5 7. RCSNT C C} ;993 E;N'I'S about two days, May 31^' and June i °'. No one likes the idea of discharging untreated human waste into our lakes. '-` -' \9ar'r, i -3anu; on Sew.a;e Stinks Z/r'Ni Stark Darer, oa BnLL w'35 Yii3s 1llCldellt as horrible as m311y feat? 1(1011't think SO. �y`y a, Sewage Stinks { `�f ;,f„ I am not saying this should happen with regularity. From all accounts, the x iA ir(jll ➢tCehn6 %Gll $Ubba•9 Cl'a p]I}' S.viug Ais)( ugealechoex on City of Mound acted prudently and responsibly given the unfortunate Babba s Crappy situation. In the context oflake pollution, . this was not such a big deal. Is S \ving Why do I say this? d i ipr ,db yon Whit We Dolr'i Rnov. 1h nM1 lIS P... kv First of all, our sewage collection systems are leaky. Sewage leaks oat of da)uulpmo ➢ay on What We Donl the pipes and into anriaceand groundwater i egldal'iv. Sewage OVCIfI01 +'a Knowabout d7S from leaking, aging or mal- fitting pipes can enter storm sewers and get dlek55s oil Rapt Ga,&,s P... into the enn9Lonment. I am not sure bow prevalent this is around lake Minnetonka, but it is a recognized problem in the nation, 01, fienn•lake on Winter Fiat) Kill- - That... diolsss on to in Gardens Secondly, let's look at the numbers. I have not found any measurement of the sewage that was discharged, but let's assume it was from all of Mound's 9,052 residents and w;LS totally untreated. Using that figure, \ +nth 3IiC.I41 t`tn5 1b raylake ou respect to C. cold, a bacterial indicator offecal contamination. I estimate - June rm.l Winter Fish Rills - that n80 billion organisms were discharged over these two days. This may That... sound like a large amount, but sections of Painter's Creek, which enters 94a zon 4 Jennings Bay on Lake Minnetonka, average about zz billion organisms ay )12OiJ per dayor8,000 billion organisms per -- 4r5 times more than the my ' 9tarchamp dRGri1CBJ` year estimate that the City of Mound may have discharged. And, Jennings Say AoIC2014 is not the onlyso rce of F. colt contamination to Lake Minnetonka. Othm• 4lxy zmq sources include the Dubai creeks and streams plus animal wastes. -1371 un•a,eg<,rs >)d SO http:// Iakemanagersnotebook. com/2014 /06 /07 /.cewaoe- ctinl -Q/ "I,,.,., . Sewage Stinks I A Lake Manager's Notebook Aydlzotq Warm- blooded animals have the same pathogenic contamination in their • blardr 2e14 feces as humans. For the most part, these wastes are not collected or Rmccctcr treated — rather, they wash off in heavy rains. It is likely the L,gin contamination from our pets (as well as raccoons, geese and other CATFG OR PS wildlife) and livestock feedlots was far greater than teas discharged by • t;orotegoraeU Mound. Many beaches are closed due to non -human fecal contamination = Comment,, RSS following heavy rains. We should note that Mound's beaches were tested = WordPreas.cm" at acceptable levels of contamination less tlmn a week ater the discharges. I estimate that Mound's recent discharges totaled about 88 pounds of phosphorus. Again, not acceptable ifit's avoidable. But here is some perspective. Six Mile Crack, which enters Halsted's Bay, delivers 6,271 pounds of phosphorus per year -every year. Other sources of phosphorus to Lake Minnetonka raise the total to over 14,000 pounds per year. So Mound's discharge is almost literally drop in the lake, The Clean Water Act demands that much of this excess phosphorus be mitigated. The plan to do that (called a TMDL for "total maximum daily load") finds that an "allowable' phosphorus load to Lake Minnetonka's four impaired Bays (Jennings, Halsteds, Stubbs and West Arm) still exceeds 5,000 pounds per year- more than 50 times what Mound discharged. hr other words, even after cleaning up these phosphorus sources (at a cost of tens of millions of dollars), there will still be far more phosphorus entering Lake Minnetonka than Mound's discharge, Why don't we get excited about this? Probably because we cannot see it, and it doesn't make headlines in local media. Orbecause runoff portrays a cleaner image than poop. Overall, our society has dove a good job in managing bureau waste. Our nation's lakes and rivers are much improved. Like any mechanical system, there are imperfecttions, but in context, these are minor. Monad's discharge, while unfortunate, is a small matter. We have bigger fish to fry. So yes, sewage does stink. But perhaps not as much as other things now going into our lakes. Share this: Vl'.vlker f Faceeaok rn +r,;oggle Iaading... ❑aI.in.¢rk tY,e oe�rna3ink rt RA:COAN YOtYU07 - 1372 -A http://Iakemanagersnotebook.com/2014/nr,/n7/cpx.,.,.-.f;-I.. Page 2 of 3 IIET, Register Log ut Sntriee RSS Cmnmems RS$ ^ 4NOrdPresa.cmn F'r goty Many of Us recall the legendary algae blooms an Lake Minnetonka in the Rmccctcr 1.960s. At time, it .here were. six wastewater treatment plants L,gin discharging sewage into the lake. Txcess phosphorus from these Eanies RSS discharges caused the algae blooms. Since that time, the wastewater has been diverted elsewhere (where it is treated and discharged into the = Comment,, RSS Minnesota River) and Lake Minnetonka's algae blooms have been = WordPreas.cm" substantlallymitigated, Becauseof this history, weare'keeulyawareof Phosphorus sources into Lake Minnetonka (and many other takes). t;ODa S9 L'N71'1' So, what impact did Mound's discharges have at this time? I estimate that Mound's recent discharges totaled about 88 pounds of phosphorus. Again, not acceptable ifit's avoidable. But here is some perspective. Six Mile Crack, which enters Halsted's Bay, delivers 6,271 pounds of phosphorus per year -every year. Other sources of phosphorus to Lake Minnetonka raise the total to over 14,000 pounds per year. So Mound's discharge is almost literally drop in the lake, The Clean Water Act demands that much of this excess phosphorus be mitigated. The plan to do that (called a TMDL for "total maximum daily load") finds that an "allowable' phosphorus load to Lake Minnetonka's four impaired Bays (Jennings, Halsteds, Stubbs and West Arm) still exceeds 5,000 pounds per year- more than 50 times what Mound discharged. hr other words, even after cleaning up these phosphorus sources (at a cost of tens of millions of dollars), there will still be far more phosphorus entering Lake Minnetonka than Mound's discharge, Why don't we get excited about this? Probably because we cannot see it, and it doesn't make headlines in local media. Orbecause runoff portrays a cleaner image than poop. Overall, our society has dove a good job in managing bureau waste. Our nation's lakes and rivers are much improved. Like any mechanical system, there are imperfecttions, but in context, these are minor. Monad's discharge, while unfortunate, is a small matter. We have bigger fish to fry. So yes, sewage does stink. But perhaps not as much as other things now going into our lakes. Share this: Vl'.vlker f Faceeaok rn +r,;oggle Iaading... ❑aI.in.¢rk tY,e oe�rna3ink rt RA:COAN YOtYU07 - 1372 -A http://Iakemanagersnotebook.com/2014/nr,/n7/cpx.,.,.-.f;-I.. Page 2 of 3 IIET, Register Log ut Sntriee RSS Cmnmems RS$ ^ 4NOrdPresa.cmn F'r goty Sewage Stinks I A Lake Manager's Notebook Page 3 of 3 One thought on "Sewage Stinks" NMark Hants says: ,I ,zor }1[525 pm Wow Dick! Fantastic article ... and spot on. You did a gmat,job ofjoi ing things In perspective. A couple notes to add ... in my e8 years here, °hound has never had to divert the aewage as we (lid this time, So that shows how rare of an event this was. Also Mound only ciphered offthe top and littered what it pumped and it wee very diluted es well. We only pumped for t2 houcq not 2 days, qur engineers have created ao analogy that most people can understand. they said ifyou take a thimble of raw sewage and dump it into a 5 gallon pall, that correctly represents how diluted it was, Then you pour that 5 gallon bndket into anormal in ground hackyard, wmmming pool, that would represent Shttch Lake_ SO [hat is a prekty a<sanate description. Signs ore alarting to lc pulled from axone of the pumping sites as the MpC,1l1as tested twice with far below maximum acceptable readings. Afew remain including Lake l.ungdon which is already hea+Ny co;itnminated along++lth a maple more hea+y goosa locations. `Planks forthv artiste. Creat joh. Mark Flame. Monad \Mayor Wyly Leave a Reply Enter your commt,nt here _.. _. _._.... 1 ,% I-Z- -6 Pup ^..v http:// Iakemanagersnotebook .com/2014/06/07 /sewage - stinks/ 6/9/2014 For Immediate Release June 6, 2014 SENATOR DAVID OSMEK DEMANDS ACTION ON SEWER PROBLEMS Metropolitan Council needs to take responsibility for putting residents at risk St. Paul — State Senator Dave Osmek (R- Mound) criticized the Metropolitan Council today after recent strong storms forced the City of Mound to pump untreated wastewater into nearby lakes. "Once again, the Met Council has misplaced its priorities and are causing harm to Minnesota families," Sen. Osmek said. "While they continue to find money for expensive and inefficient light rail trains, the Met Council has repeatedly ignored ten years of requests to fix our vital sewer lines. Their inaction is putting thousands of Minnesotans at risk, be it local homeowners or anyone enjoying a swim in Lake Minnetonka. The Met Council, appointed and accountable to only Governor Dayton, bears full responsibility for this problem and I expect them to take action." Regional sewer lines operated by the Met Council are nearly at capacity. City officials have made repeated requests for upgrades, but improvements have been continuously delayed. Asa member of the Mound Council in 2006, Sen. Osmek heard the plans, which have yet to be initiated. Heavy rainfall over the weekend forced the city to drain the wastewater to avoid it from backing up into the basements of homes in the area. "Another delay is not acceptable. I have asked that the Met Council representative for Mound meet with me in the coming weeks and I expect to hear short-term and long -term plans to protect Mound residents and lake users from this situation in the future." Sen. Osmek said. "Mound has independently spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to reduce ground and lake water from infiltrating its sanitary sewer system. 10 years of waiting for the Met Council is long enough. It's time for action." Officials expect the wastewater to impact Lake Minnetonka and surrounding lakes. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the City of Mound plan to test the E. coli levels of these lakes, and have issued warnings to residents to avoid swimming and recreational activities until further notice. Senator Osmek is serving his first term in the Minnesota State Senate. He encourages and appreciates constituent input, and can be reached at 651- 296 -1282. By mail to 19 State Office Building, 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55115, or via e -mail to sen. dvvid. osmekQenate. nin -1373- Carlton Moore From: Metropolitan Council [METC @public.govdelivery.coml Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 9:55 AM To: sen.david.osmek @senate.mn Subject: News release: Addressing inflow and infiltration key to saving lakes, preventing future sewer backups Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page. M �TROPOLITAN • . i (St. Paul, MN) - Last weekend, heavy rainfall and high water levels in Lake Minnetonka, coupled with unaddressed inflow and infiltration of stormwater into the wastewater system, resulted in a release of sewage by the City of Mound into Lake Minnetonka. Contrary to some reports, the Metropolitan Council's regional sanitary sewer facilities operated continuously throughout the weekend and were not the cause of the discharge. Rather, it was the Inflow and infiltration of stormwater into the Mound municipal sewer system that caused the spill. If inflow and infiltration is not addressed regionally, it may cause future spills in the metro region. "This is an unfortunate illustration of how rain water and groundwater entering the sanitary sewer system is a costly and messy adversary," said Metropolitan Council Environmental Services General Manager Leisa Thompson. "Inflow and infiltration of clear water into local and regional wastewater pipes is not only a threat to public health and the environment, it also is waste of resources to have to treat otherwise unpolluted water." What is inflow and infiltration? Inflow and infiltration is clear water that enters the sanitary sewer system from a variety of sources. Infiltration occurs when groundwater seeps into sewer pipes through cracks, leaky pipe joints and /or deteriorated manholes. Inflow, the much bigger problem, occurs in direct proportion to the amount of rainfall. Inflow is storm water that enters the wastewater system through rain leaders, basement sump pumps or foundation drains illegally connected directly to a sanitary sewer pipe. How do we know that inflow and infiltration caused the situation in Mound? During the weekend rain event, the Metropolitan Council's regional sewer facilities in the Mound area operated at capacities six times the average wastewater flow conditions. Regionally, sewer facilities operated on average two to two and a half times normal flow due to the storm. Was the Metropolitan Council able to handle sewer flows six times higher than normal? -1374- All flows received by the Metropolitan Council from local sewer facilities in the Mound area last weekend passed without incident to the Council's wastewater treatment facilities. Sewage released into Lake Minnetonka by the City of Mound never reached the regional system. What happens when inflow and infiltration exceeds capacities? Excessive inflow and infiltration of clear water that mixes with the regular amounts of wastewater can elevate flows above six times the average wastewater flows. This can ovedoad city -owned and Council -owned pipes and pumping stations, cause wastewater to back up, and place private property at risk for backups or lead to bypasses of wastewater to the ground or to surface waters. What does the Council do to plan for major rain events? The Metropolitan Council recognizes that reasonable amounts of extraneous clean water will enter sanitary sewers, and it offers cities sewer capacities of about two to three times their average daily wastewater flow so that sewers can handle non - excessive amounts of inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sewers. The Council's regional sewers are built with capacity beyond that level to accommodate increased wastewater flows that will come with future growth. Will building bigger municipal and regional sewer systems help with this problem? It's far too expensive to vastly increase capacity to handle the occasional but excessive amounts of clear water entering sanitary sewers. The Council is committed to working with cities to repair their local infrastructure and require property owners to disconnect sump pumps and foundation drains that are illegally connected to sanitary sewers. This targeted and, ultimately, far less costly approach is the right way to address this problem. How is our region addressing inflow and infiltration? Building on previous efforts, the Council in 2007 launched a more aggressive Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Program, with targeted reduction goals for 50 communities identified with contributing excessive levels of inflow and infiltration into the regional sanitary sewer system. Changes in the Council's program in 2010 gave financially strapped communities more time to make the necessary financial investments. The Council receives funding from the Minnesota Legislature for this program, which it passes through as grants to assist communities, businesses and individual home owners in making necessary repairs to reduce inflow and infiltration. The Council received $2M. in bonding during the 2014 legislative session to make additional grants to communities for this purpose. "The Council commends cities for what they have accomplished in reducing excessive inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewers, but more work still needs to be done regionwide on attacking this problem," Thompson said. Click here for more information on the Council's Inflow and Infiltration Reduction Program. metrocoundLorg Update your subscriptions, modify your password or email address, or stop subscriptions at any time on your Subscriber Preferences Page. You will need to use your email address to log in. If you have questions or problems with the subscription service, please contact subscriberhelp.govdelivery.com. This service is provided to you at no charge by Met- -litan Council. -1375 el MEMO DATE: .l,NW5, 2014 TO: Mayor Hanus & City Council Members FROM: Kandis Hanson, City Mana.(�k RE: Sewer water bypass event 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364 -1687 PH: (952) 472 -0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB. www.cityofmound.com On Saturday and Sunday this past weekend our area experienced an unusually large amount of rainfall. • This caused the sanitary sewer service to approach its full capacity. • This created the possibility that sewage could have backed up into nearly 1,000 homes in Mound. Quick action by city staff prevented most of the potential sewer back up. • After trying a variety of methods to take water out of the system, we determined the only safe solution was to bypass the system and release grey water into area lakes. • The alternative was to allow it to backup into homes and businesses. • By quickly gaining permission from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to release grey water into local lakes, we were able to save hundreds of homes and businesses from possibly catastrophic damage. • This is a good thing. Unfortunately, some buildings did sustain sewer backups and we will be working with those owners. Because contaminated water was released into our lakes, public health and other officials placed restrictions on access to the lakes for the past few days. -1376- printed on recycled paper Current status The current issues on area lakes stem more from high water than possible contamination. • Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has instituted Emergency High Water Conditions • -No wake rules are in effect on the entire lake • A swim advisory is in place from the MN Department of Health until testing can confirm the safety of the water. • Hennepin County has allowed all beaches in Mound to be open. Short term: We have had an extraordinary amount of rain. If we were to have the same issues tomorrow, we would likely do the same thing rather than risk mass sewer backups into homes. Long term: We have been working on long term solutions to prevent this kind of problem over the recent 10 years. Further improvements will involve significant repairs to all of the sewer systems serving the city. • Slip- lining • New piping • Sump -pump evaluations • Private line slip -ling -1377- For Immediate Release: Wednesday. June 4, 2014. 9:10pm From: Kandis Hanson. City Manager Contact: 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 952- 240 -5244 kandi shansonCa,�cityofinound.com Area fun in Lake Minnetonka to resume soon! Mound_ MN— Releases from this point will consist of the newest information possible as attained by the City. Those following this story are invited to see releases with dates June 1 -3, 2014, to catch up on the story. Having dodged a bullet over night on Tuesday, City Officials have their fingers crossed that rain predicted for this weekend stays away. Agencies governing Lake Minnetonka are considering "No Wake" and you are encouraged to check sources at Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and Minnehaha Watershed District for details and updates on wakes and lake levels. Disaster was averted for hundred's of homes in Mound and, although not fortunate for them, only about 25 homes have reported backup, instead of 1000. Backup has consisted of'water infiltration and/or sewer sludge, a result of sewer systems being filled beyond capacity by the deluge of rain on the weekend and saturated soils. Calling for drastic measures. Mound and more than 25 other cities in Minnesota were forced to divert sewage from backing up in basements. Linder the authoritative direction of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Minnesota Health Department (MHD), cities diverted ravaging sewer sludge from finding its way into most basements in Mound. In a thoughtful process by Mound public works, rain water was siphoned off the top of sewer sludge in man holes and was filtered before draining to three area lakes. No solids made their way to lakes. Pumping of what was admittedly contained contaminated rain water ended at 12:10 a.m. on Monday morning, June 1. Linder the direction MPCA and the MHD, water quality testing is underway and the first test result will be posted on this site as soon as it is available on Thursday, June 5. Samples at each diversion site are being taken again Thursday this week. The test professional remarked that water at the six sites looked clear and that fish were swimming. Readers are asked to share this optimistic report, with the thought that the swimming advisory for area lakes, including Lake Minnetonka. is expected to be short -terns. According to those in the field of ecology, E coli are present in lakes at all times and the extremely diluted make -up of the sewer diversion at Mound is minor and will quickly dissipate under the care of Mother Nature. Also. beaches, which are under the watchful eye of Hennepin County Health Department, have been declared open at all but two locations on Lake Minnetonka, which is a healthy indicator of the makeup of the lake. You may view for yourself' at: htir):�',,w''w h nne ?n, us! residciltsiheaih- medicaUlzublie -sw9m- beaches. -1378- Please see this website - �NNv .citvofmound.com- -far daily updates on water testing results. along wNith other pertinent information. City of Mound staff will report to the Council and Mound residents on the sewer bypass event at its regular City Council Meeting next week and the public is invited. The meeting will be held at 7:00pm. June I0. 2014, in the Council Chambers of the Centennial Building, 5341 Maywood Road. Efforts are being made to have representation from MPCA and the Metropolitan Council. Questions may be directed to Kandis Hanson, City Manager, kandishansongcitvolmou lid, corn. 952 -240 -5244. -1379- For Immediate Release: Tuesday, June 3, 2014, 7:45pm From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Contact: 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 952 -240 -5244 kandishanson @cityofinound.com Mound sewer bypass saves 100's of homes from sewer backup in basements. Mound, MN— Extreme rains, amounting to around 4.5 inches over May 31 and June I overwhelmed Met Council and City of Mound's sanitary sewer system and forced the city to bypass the sewer system, saving an estimated 1,000 homes from sewer infiltration. With the necessary permission by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Health Department (MHD), the move was similar to about 30 cities in Minnesota that discharge into a nearby body of water to prevent sewer backup in homes within their community due to incessant rains and ground saturation. Rain water was siphoned off the top of content in man holes and was filtered before draining to three area lakes. Pumping of affected water ended at12:10 a.m. on Monday morning, June 1. Since that time, by order of the MPCA and the M11D, testing has been prescribed. Multiple samples are being taken at each of the six sites on Tuesday and Thursday of each week. A test report on lake quality at each site will be available before the end of this week. A spokesperson for the testing company remarked at how clear the water is at each location, noting fish swimming and normal ph and oxygen levels. From this optimistic report, the swimming ban for lakes is expected to be short- lived. The Mound system flows into the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) which is the transport system for cities in the region. MCES pipes were full beyond capacity and denied Mound material from entering the system. Inflow and infiltration of storm water into the aged MCES systems, in large part, is to blame. Capital plans by the MCES programmed for mid- 2000's have be delayed for upgrade until 2014, with completion slated for 2018. Mound city officials will be strongly recommending reconsideration of project start dates with system design that adjusts for the Met Council's expectation for affordable housing and density in member cities and the obviously changing climate. Whereas, an estimated 1,000 homes could have been the subject of a catastrophic incident, about 20 -25 home owners in Mound have reported backup involving of sewer waste since the weekend. The City has approximately 63 miles of sewer lines and has invested what nears $1 million into sewer lining projects in the recent 10 years. Sewers in Mound are the subject of annual -1380- maintenance that includes televising and jetting for debris, allowing for maximum flow through the Mound system. The City has been a leader in programs that inspect for the disconnection of sump pumps from the sewer system, removing the concern for gray water collection by the Mound sewer system. As a result, claims against the City of Mound for sewer backup have been minimal over the years. Please see this website — www.cityofinound.com- -for daily updates on water testing results on a bay -by -bay basis along with other pertinent information. Questions may be directed to Kandis Hanson, City Manager, kandishansonkcityofmound.com, 952- 240 -5244. -1381- Metropolitan Council Environmental Services and City of Mound Address Overloaded Wastewater Systems Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) operates the regional wastewater collection system and the seven regional wastewater treatment plants. Wastewater from the City of Mound and 106 other communities in the metro area flows into MCES's regional sanitary sewers, and then on to the treatment plants. Over the weekend of May 31 and June 1, MCES coordinated with city of Mound staff and provided some of its staff and equipment to help pump as much wastewater as possible out of the overloaded areas of the local and regional sanitary sewers in Mound and truck it by tank truck to other discharge points in the sewer that were not overloaded. MCES wastewater pumping stations in Mound were in continuous operation over the weekend and were working at or above their designed maximum capacity. Untreated wastewater was bypassed to the environment for approximately 14% hours on June 1, rather than risking it backing up in to perhaps as many as 1,000 homes. This was the unfortunate consequence of extreme rainfall and water - logged ground resulting in very excessive amounts of clean water entering the sanitary sewers that are intended for wastewater only. If your basement had a wastewater backup, we urge you to document it with photos and /or video, and contact a professional cleaning service to clean and disinfect damaged areas. Also, we urge you to document your backup - related expenses in the event that insurance coverage or other financial assistance is available. The bypass of untreated wastewater can occur when excessive amounts of rainwater or groundwater (inflow and infiltration) enter the sanitary sewer system and overload it. MCES recognizes that reasonable amounts of extraneous clean water will enter sanitary sewers, and it provides sewer capacity of about three times the average daily wastewater flow so that sewers can handle non - excessive amounts of inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sewers. Excessive inflow and infiltration can elevate flows to perhaps six times the average flow. This can cause wastewater to back up at City -owned and MCES -owned pipes and pumping stations, placing private property at risk for backups or leading to bypasses of wastewater to the ground or to surface waters. MCES is working with Mound and some 4 dozen cities in the metro area to prevent this excessive flow of clean water from getting into local and regional sanitary sewers in the first place. "This is a much more targeted and far less costly alternative, as compared to vastly increasing sanitary sewer capacities to take on the excessive stormwater that enters the sanitary sewers from the occasional but extreme rainfalls," said MCES spokesperson Tim O'Donnell. "We commend the City of Mound for what they have accomplished in reducing excessive inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewers, but more work still needs to be done regionwide on this problem." MCES has several sewer construction and sewer rehabilitation projects that have been completed since 2006, are underway, or are in planning and design in and around the City of Mound. The work will replace and /or rehabilitate aging sewer facilities and improve reliability of the regional wastewater collection system. These projects will be completed in various stages through 2018, and additional upgrades will be scheduled as needed. MCES works with all cities connected to the regional wastewater system to schedule sewer upgrades and rehabilitation as needed, as well as increases in capacity if it is warranted by anticipated growth and development. For more information, contact Tim O'Donnell at 651- 602 -1269 or tim.odonnell(c-metc. state. mn us. METROPOLITAN C 0 U N C I L From: Mark Hanus [mahanus @frontiernet.net] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 8:50 PM To. Kandis Hanson; theresa.mallov()ecm -inc com; fox9news(Woxty com; tips@wcco.com; newstipsCabwccoradio.com; imiles@kstp.com; IseavertCalkarell.com; abroaddusCabkarell.com Subject: Re: Sewer bypass press release- June2, 2014 To all, Please be advised that this is a supplement to the press release just issued by the City Manager of Mound regarding the release of sewage. My name is Mark Hanus and I am the Mayor of the City of Mound. There are a few very important points that have to be made that were not included in the press release. 1. Make no mistake that the system failure was not in the Mound sewer system. We are able to handle what mother nature has thrown at us. What failed was the MCES sewer lines which were full and were unable to take the water from the Mound system. Almost all of our city has a new or updated sewer system that is less than 12 years old with only a few exceptions. Our system and pumps are fully operational but the MCES force main is at capacity by the time it reaches us. 2. The MCES knew as early as 2005/2006 that they needed to upgrade their force main as they put it in their capital plan at that time. They continually delay this project and it is now scheduled for 2018 unless they delay it again. Over time and as recently as last winter the City of Mound requested that they get going on this project as we are at risk if they don't. 3. The MPCA strongly encouraged the city to pump as we did, to limit the number of homes damaged by this series of storms and to minimize the health risks. It is very important to our citizens and others to understand that Mound is up and operating as it should but the MCES force main was at its limit. Thank you. i -1383- StarTribune - Print Page Rains lead to widespread sewage discharges in Twin Cities Article by: BILL MCAULIFFE AND EMMA NELSON Star Tribune June 2, 2014 - 11:32 PM Three public beaches in the western Lake Minnetonka community of Mound were closed Monday after heavy weekend rains forced about 20 Minnesota cities and industries to bypass their sewage treatment operations and channel untreated waste into lakes and streams. Page I of The impact was felt from the Iowa border to the Iron Range, said A sign that went up either Sunday or Monday Monday announcing the dosing of the beach at Wychwood Beach in Wendy Turn, municipal wastewater manager for the Minnesota Mound due to an E. coli risk from raw sewage being pumped into Lake Minnetonka after storms over the weekend. ] JEFF Pollution Control Agency. Most cities that used the bypasses were WHEELER ,A¢ icfcwhecier @startribune.com The mayor of Mound blames the Met Council for his city having to pump able to discharge sewage into rivers or other bodies of water not untreated sewage into storm sewers feeding into Lake used for recreation, she said. But in Mound, an overwhelmed Minnetonka after heavy rains over the weekend. He was photographed in Mound Monday, June 2, 2014, at Surfside sanitary sewer system forced the discharge of contaminated Park along with state senator Dave Osmek on one of the beaches that was closed because of an E. coli bacteria risk wastewater into heavily used Lake Minnetonka. from the raw sewage. Feed Loader, In the coming days, contaminated runoff from streets — not from sewer pipes — could lead to other restrictions, said Duane Hudson, environmental health program coordinator for Hennepin County. Monday's beach closures were the result of "an abundance of caution," because the results of lakewater tests are not yet in, Hudson said. The treatment -plant bypasses came when the amount of rain caused so much seepage into sanitary sewer pipes that they became clogged, creating the potential for sewage backup into homes. Nearly 1,000 homes in Mound were facing that possibility when the city notified the MPCA it was bypassing its sewage treatment plant Sunday. It returned to regular treatment operations early Monday, but about 20 homes were contaminated and will be uninhabitable until they're cleaned up, said Mound city manager Kandis Hanson. It's not uncommon for Minnesota beaches to be closed due to E. coli contamination, since it can also be produced by waste from geese, ducks and other wild animals, as well as from boaters dumping waste overboard. Hanson said that although the sewage discharged Sunday was clear and contained no visible solids, it was nearly certain to have contaminated water. "it should dissipate quickly — the same as goose poop," she said. An infrastructure question? Mound Mayor Mark Hanus said he doesn't remember the ce -13$4- having to pump sewage into the lake. He blamed the problem on http:// www. startribune,com /printarticle / ?id= 261566281 A sign that went up announcing the closing of the beach at Wychwood Beach in Mound due to an E. toll risk from raw sewage being pumped into Lake Minnetonka after storms over the weekend. Jeff Wheeler, Dml - Star Tribune 6/4/70 14 StarTribune - Print Page what he called outdated regional sewage mains overseen by the Metropolitan Council that service the west side of Lake Minnetonka. State Sen. David Osmek, R- Mound, said the Met Council has promised a major upgrade for about a decade but hasn't delivered. In the meantime, he said, Mound has put hundreds of thousands of dollars into fixing city mains. Sewer upgrades are in the works around the region, but "past and future planned improvements would not have prevented this spill because it resulted from extremely excessive amounts of rainwater," Met Council spokeswoman Meredith Vadis said in an e- mail. "We are working with Mound and some four dozen cities in the metro area to prevent this excessive flow of clean water from getting into local and regional sanitary sewers in the first place. That is a much more targeted and far less costly alternative, as compared to vastly increasing sanitary sewer capacities to take on stormwater that enters the sanitary sewers from occasional but extreme rainfalls." Page 2 of Harold Enamorado made a sand castle with his son, Nessandro, at Mound's Surfside Park Monday afternoon while Harold's mother, Nosa, sal nearby. Photos by JEFF WHEELER � jeff.whee!er @startribune..com, Mound Mayor Mark Hanus, left, was at Surfside Park Monday afternoon with Sen. Dave Osmek, R- Mound, on one of the beaches that was closed because of an E. coli bacteria risk. JEFF WHEELER • jefFwheeler @startrdune.ccm, On one Lake Minnetonka beach, at least some residents were taking things in stride Monday. Sarah Hinck and Miriam Swanson had the beach at Surfside Park to themselves. Hinck, 29, of Mound, said she's been going to Lake Minnetonka her whole life. This time of year, she said, it's common for swimming to be prohibited — though she doesn't remember a warning quite like this one. "if it's during this time of year, no one really gets in the water anyway," Hinck said. High lake, high creek Meanwhile, Lake Minnetonka rose Monday to its highest level on record. The jagged- edged, 14,000 -acre lake was a foot higher than it was at the end of April, 5 inches higher than it was Friday and 1.5 inches higher than the previous high -water record set in September 2001. Many shoreline docks were covered with water, said Minnehaha Creek Watershed District spokeswoman Telly Mamayek. No -wake restrictions remained in place on the lake, and the MCWD renewed warnings to canoeists and kayakers to stay off the creek. Storm cleanup elsewhere in the metro area continued Monday. The city of Eden Prairie condemned a home that was undermined by a back yard mudslide Sunday. And in Edina, officials reopened a street that had been closed due to high water but were advising residents who sandbagged their properties along Minnehaha Creek to keep the protection in place. The forecast suggests that more thunderstorms might be possible Thursday and Friday in the Twin Cities. The national Climate Prediction Center had identified strong chances for a wetter - than - normal June across much of Minnesota, with cooler - than- normal temperatures. The up side of rain The weekend rains made this the second - wettest January- through -June 1 period on record in the Twin Cities, with 16.84 inches of precipitation at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. Normal for the first five months of the year is about 9.58 inches. The record of 19.47 was set in 1965, a year of disastrous spring flooding. These rains may actually have been well- timed. With emeroino leaves and other new plants happily lapping up moisture, much of what might have run quickly into rivers in late sun...13 ai or early spring is instead being used up by greenery, said http:// www .startribune.com/printarticle / ?id= 261566281 6/4/2014 StarTiibune - Print Page Page 3 of Craig Schmidt, hydrologist with the National Weather Service office in Chanhassen. As of Monday, no disruptive flooding was expected along any rivers across southern Minnesota and west - central Wisconsin through the rest of the week. Flood watches across most of the state steadily evaporated Monday, even in northeastern Minnesota, where the heavy rain moved after leaving central and southern Minnesota. Hibbing received more than 6 inches between Saturday morning and midafternoon Monday. bill.mcauliffe @startribune.com . 612 - 673 -7646 emma.nelson @startribune.com • 612 - 673 -4509 © 2014 Star Tribune -1386- hrt„• / /.a..xnx� etarriihnna mm /nrintarficle /9rd= 261566791 6/4/2012 For Immediate Release: Monday, June 2, 2014, 7:45pm From: Kandis Hanson, City Manager Contact: 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 952- 240 -5244 kandishanson@cityofinound.com Mound, MN —Heavy rains over May 31 and June I overwhelmed the City of Mound's sanitary sewer system and forced the city to bypass the sewer system to save Mound residents from experiencing sewer backup. The city took this step to keep wastewater from backing up into the basements of an estimated 1,000 homes. It acted after the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Minnesota Health Department (MHD) endorced the bypass. According MPCA, weather conditions in Minnesota over the weekend forced 20 -30 cities across the state to discharge into a nearby body of water to prevent sewer backup in homes within their community. The bypass lasted from 10:30 a.m. Sunday, May 31 through 12:10 a.m. on Monday morning, June 1. In this process the City siphoned off untreated rainwater from its sanitary sewer system and, through a filtering method, released the untreated wastewater from its sanitary sewer system into storm drains near four lift stations bordering Lake Minnetonka, one site near Lake Langdon, and one site near Dutch Lake, all within the city limits of Mound. The City wishes to emphasize that solid waste was filtered out and no solids made their way to area lakes. This deliberate decision to save Mound homes resulted in the bypassed wastewater making its way to those lakes. Although the rainwater which had the solids strained from it is greatly diluted, it increased the lakes' load of E. coli bacteria, which can cause illness. The locations near Lake Minnetonka are the lagoon at Emerald Road and Channel Lane, Beachside outfall at Shorewood, the Avalon Park outfall at Bartlett Boulevard; and Lynwood at Morton Channel. On Lake Langdon it's Cottonwood and Lynwood. And on Dutch Lake it's the Grandview boat launch. The City, under the direction of the Minnesota Health Department, has the oversight of a water sampling and testing procedure prescribed by MHD and the sites have been posted as closed until further notice, by order of the MPCA and the MHD. Testing will take place over the next two weeks or until water tests as safe. For the time being, people are advised not to swim or do other activities, such as water - skiing, that would increase the chances of their swallowing lake water. The Mound system flows into the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) which operates the regional wastewater collection system and the seven regional wastewater treatment plants. Rain raised levels in the MCES pipe to a point that prevented Mound waste water from entering the MCES force main. -1387- June 11, 2014 TO: Kandis Hanson Greg Pederson Sarah Smith First, I would like to thank all of you for all the support you have given me over the years, with my special circumstances. Unfortunately I feel that it is the time to move on, due to all the reasons I stated, at the meeting, last week. This is to serve as my two week notice. I have accepted the CSO position with the City of Minnetrista. My last day of employment with Mound will be on June 26, 2014. Again, thank you for allowing me to work, with all of you for the past several years, here in Mound. Respectfully � Mike Wocken June 16, 2014 Dear , You are receiving this letter because you served as an election judge in the past or where listed on roster that was submitted by one of the major political parties. Please complete the attached application and return to the Mound City Hall, 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, by Friday, June 27`'' via regular mail, email, fax or in person. Based on the responses received, we will let you know if we need you to work as an election judge during the primary election on August 12'' or the general election on November 4". Please note that you will be required to attend a mandatory Election Judge paid training on one of the following days: Thursday, July 10' from 1:00 pm — 3:00 pm or Thursday, July 31" from 6:30 pm — 8:30 pm The training will take place in the Mound City Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road. Election Judges are paid $8.00 per hour. Please let me know if you have any questions on these matters at (952)472 -0633 or via email at catherinepauscheea cityofmound.com. Sincerely, Falk 9� Catherine Pausche Director of Finance and Administration -1389- MEMORANDUM Date: June 17, 2014 To: Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer (+tom 1 Subject: Public Demonstration of New Voting Equipment Per the requirements of M.S. 206.58 subd. 1, the following information was put on the City of Mound's website on the Elections page regarding the public demonstration period for the new voting equipment. 206.58 AUTHORIZATION FOR USE. Subdivision 1.Municipalities. The governing body of a municipality, at a regular meeting or at a special meeting called for the purpose, may provide for the use of an electronic voting system in one or more precincts and at all elections in the precincts, subject to approval by the county auditor. The governing body shall disserninate information to the public about the use of a new voting system at least 60 days prior to the election and shall provide for instruction of voters with a demonstration voting system in a public place for the six weeks immediately prior to the first election at which the new voting system will be used. New voting equipment for upcoming elections City to make use of upgraded ballot counters The City of Mound voters will see a new ballot counter and ballot box when casting their votes this year. The basic voting process will remain the same. Voters will still complete a paper ballot and will insert it into the ballot counter. However, advanced optical scan technology and improved voter features in the new voting equipment will enhance the voting process. -1390 - pdnred on recyGed FSPer Equipment features ES &S's DS200TM combines a paper -based balloting system with the flexibility and efficiency of a digital environment. The DS200TM is an intelligent, advanced, integrated system featuring the most advanced patented digital image technology. The new equipment offers a number of advantages: Modem: After the polls close, transmits votes directly from the polling place. Flexibility: Processes a variety of ballot sizes and designs, from 11" to 19 ". Convenience: Lightweight, compact, and easy to set up and use. Intelligence: Uses Intelligent Mark Recognition technology to determine what dictates a mark for a candidate. Compliance: Usability, accessibility, and security enhancements that comply with the 2005 Voluntary Voting Systems Guidelines. Independence and privacy: Guaranteed for people with special needs because the equipment can accept ballots processed by AutoMARK, our assistive voting equipment. Flexible communications: 12 -inch LCD touch screen improves voter communication and supports multiple languages. Reliability during power outages: Internal battery pack provides reliable and sustained power in the event of a power outage. Training, demonstrations and voter education Equipment training will be provided to City election staff by Hennepin County and ES &S. Election staff will in turn train head election judges and regular election judges on the operation and use of the new voting system. Equipment demonstrations are available at the Mound City Hall from July 1 through August 11, 2014. Walk -ins may receive a demonstration, weekdays, July 1 - August 11, between the hours of 9 - 11 a.m., or you may set up an appointment for a demonstration, weekdays, July 1 - August 11, by calling 952 -472- 0633. Voter education before Election Day will include public demonstrations, articles in the City's newsletter, and information on the City of Mound Elections web page. On Election Day, instructions for voters will be provided by the judges at each polling place. Questions? Please contact Catherine at 952- 472 -0633. -1391-