Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2014-11-25 CC Agenda Packet
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CI TY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teannwork- and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, NOV 25, 2014 — 7:00 PM REGULAR RESCHEDULED MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Open meeting 1 Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims *B. Approve minutes Oct 28, 2014 regular meeting *C. Approve Pay Request No. 2 and Final from Allied Blacktop Company in the amount of $2,500.00 for work completed on the 2014 Seal Coat Project, City Project No. PW -14 -07 *D. Approve Pay Request No.I from Schneider Excavating & Grading, Inc in the amount of $74,139.90 for work completed on the 2014 Drainage Improvements Project, City Project No. PW -14 -04 *E. Approve Ordinance Amending Chapter 42 of the Mound City Code as it Relates to Nuisances *F. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for 2217 Chateau Lane *G. Approve Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for 3036 Highland Boulevard 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Public Hearing(s) A. Dan Faulkner, representing Bolton & Menk Engineering, requesting action on Resolution Ordering Improvement and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements — Tuxedo Boulevard, City Project No. PW -15 -02 2461 -2487 2488 -2494 2495 -2496 2497 -2498 2499 -2500 2501 -2522 2523 -2547 2548 (See Separate Packet) PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. B. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/ action on Planning Commission Recommendation: 1. Adopting Ordinance Amending Chapter 14 and 129 of the Mound City Code as it Relates to the Keeping of Animals 2. Action Adopting Resolution Authorizing Publication of an Ordinance by Title and Summary Planning Commission Recommendations(s) Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action on Planning Case No. 14 -25 for Variances 1975 Lakeside Lane Applicant: Mark Lee 8. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Planning Commission: Oct 7, 2014 C. Reports: Fire Commission Meeting: Nov 19, 2014 WeCAB Annual Meeting: YTD Sept 30, 2014 D. Correspondence: 9. Adjourn 2549 -2557 2554 -2555 2556 2558 -2575 2576 -2582 2583 -2603 2604 Vote: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: � I i,� s�_.�, i« rz y t ? _uIn. City of • • 4 2014 SEP14KENGRAV $ 61192.91 2014 0914BOLTMNK $ 110,462.60 2014 OCT14ELANCC $ 21494.06 2014 111314CTYMAN $ 25,416.22 2014 112014UBREFD $ 71904.03 2014 112514CITY $ 135,670.11 2014 112514HWS $ 86,494.50 TOTAL CLAIM -2461- Invoice 122779 10131/2014 Cash Payment CITY OF MOUND 11/17/142:43 PM $36.00 ... _. _..._ - -... 10131/2014 Page 1 G 101 -23315 4856 ISLAND VIEW DR AUT 4856 IVD LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 Payments G 101 -23312 5168 TUXEDO BLVD PC 14- —1"V Or MOUND Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 $42.00 Current Period: November 2014 G 101 -23313 5325 WATERBURY PC 14 -1 Batch Name SEP14KENGRAV User Dollar Amt $6,192.91 10/31/2014 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $6,192.91 G 101 -23314 1583 BLUEBIRD PC 14 -20 1583 -86 BLUEBIRD LN LEGAL SVCS SEPT $18.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 KENNEDYANDGRAVEN Cash Payment E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees EXECUTIVE LEGAL SERVICES SEPT 2014 $120.00 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -304 Legal Fees ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SERVICES SEPT $1,429.59 2014 Invoice 122779 1013112014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs MCES LIFT STATION CONVEYANCE- LEGAL $471.10 SVC SEPT 2014 Invoice 122779 10/3112014 Cash Payment E 101 -41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SVCS- WARNER LN $633.00 HAZARDOUS ACTION- SEPT 2014 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SVCS- SEPT 2014 $90534 Invoice 122779 1013112014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41600 -316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SVCS- PROPERTY $56.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW -SEPT 2014 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23231 6301 Lynwood #10 -07, Wood WOODLYN RIDGE LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $28.00 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23289 WERTH 5116 WATERBURY 5116 WATERBURY LAND USE APP LEGAL $89.00 SVCS SEPT 2014 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23304 5116 WATERBURY -PC #14- 5116 WATERBURY LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $28.00 Invoice 122779 10131/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23300 KING2201 CENTERVIEW C 2201 CENTERVIEW LN- KING LEGAL SVCS $69.90 SEPT 2014 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23309 XXXX FAIRFIELD - PC #14 -1 XXXX FAIRFIELD- MISSION WOODS LEGAL $918.98 SVC SEPT 2014 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23308 XXXX GALWAY - ROCK -PC# GALWAY RD- J. ROCK LEGAL SVCS SEPT $56.00 2014 Invoice 122779 10131/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23311 4909 ISLAND VIEW- MIKE 4909 IVD LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $36.00 Invoice 122779 10131/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23315 4856 ISLAND VIEW DR AUT 4856 IVD LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23312 5168 TUXEDO BLVD PC 14- 5168 TUXEDO LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $18.00 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 $42.00 Invoice 122779 Cash Payment G 101 -23313 5325 WATERBURY PC 14 -1 5325 WATERBURY LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $72.00 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23314 1583 BLUEBIRD PC 14 -20 1583 -86 BLUEBIRD LN LEGAL SVCS SEPT $18.00 2014 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23317 2217 CHATEAU PC #14 -24 2217 CHATEAU LN LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $204.00 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23315 4856 ISLAND VIEW DR AUT 4856 IVD LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $14.00 Invoice 122779 10/3112014 Cash Payment G 101 -23306 5500 Breezy Rd Legal Escro 5500 BREEZY RD LEGAL SVCS SEPT 2014 $42.00 Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 -2462- C t'Ty OF N11 G, U rM CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 122779 10/31/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 602 SEWER FUND 11/17114 2:43 PM Page 2 PUBLIC SAFETY-FIRE DEPT LEGAL SVCS $984.00 SEPT 2014 Wells Fargo 10100 10100 Wells Fargo $4,737.81 $984.00 $471.10 $6,192,91 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,192.91 Total $6,192.91 -2463- Total $6,192,91 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 Batch Name 0914SOLTMNK User Dollar Amt $110,462.60 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $110,462.60 $0.00 In Balance Refer 2_ BOLTON AND_MEN_K, INCO_RPO_RA Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172049 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 402 - 43120 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172046 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172048 10131/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172044 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172044 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172044 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43113 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0172050 1013112014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0172052 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401- 43213 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0172051 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -300 Professional Srvs 2010 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJECT ENGINEERING SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 MSA SYSTEM COORD UPDATE SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU OCT 102014 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU OCT 102014 SANITARY SEWER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 STORM WATER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- 01 ENG SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW1301 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROJ. PW13- 03 ENG SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW 1303 2013 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW13- 05 ENG SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW1305 WATER ENGINEERING SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 Invoice 0172044 10131/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23308 XXXX GALWAY- ROCK -PC# GALWAY RD- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW -ENG Invoice 0172061 10/3112014 SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 Invoice 0172045 10/31/2014 10/31/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 3 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 401 - 43110 -303 Engineering Fees 2014 EMERGENCY RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT FEMA PROJ ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 Invoice 0172061 10/3112014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172053 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43114 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0172055 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0172054 10/31/2014 Project PW1402 MCES FLOWS- PROJECTS, REVIEW /COORDINATION THRU OCT 10 2014 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW14- 01 ENG SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW 1401 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV 2014 PROJ PW14 -04 ENG SVCS THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW1404 -2464- 11/17/14 4:24 PM Page 1 $445.50 $580.00 $1,679.00 $1,005.00 $162.50 $650.00 $3,85600 $362.50 $855.00 $32.50 $522.50 $10,150.50 $3,185.50 $507.50 $57,968.00 $2,591.50 ti'ir .FY it!~fi.° #tip CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0172056 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0172058 10/3112014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0172060 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 427- 43121 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0172059 10/3112014 Cash Payment E 401- 43135 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0172066 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 401 - 43115 -303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0172067 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0172068 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0172047 10/31/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT 427 SEAL COAT FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND 2014 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 14 -03 ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW 1403 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN REPLACE PROD PW 14 -08 ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW1408 2014 SANITARY SEWER REHAB -ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 PW 14 -05 Project PW1405 2014 CRACK & SEALCOAT IMPROV PROJ. PW 14 -06 ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 Project PW1406 2015 TUXEDO BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 PW 15 -02 Project PW1502 2015 GRANDVIEW BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 PW 15 -01 Project PW1501 2015 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT PROJ ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 PW 15 -09 Project PW 1509 GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU OCT 10 2014 Project 14 -4 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 10100 Wells Fargo $1,527.50 $88,978.60 $580.00 $72.50 $6,158.50 $8,225.00 $4,920.50 $110,462.60 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $110,462.60 Total $110,462.60 -2465- 11/17/14 424 PM Page 2 $4,502,50 $2,104.50 $339.50 $72.50 $12,370.50 $1 0,743.60 $4,021.50 $1,905.00 $100,312.10 CITY OF MOUND Payments 11/18114 1:11 PM Page 1 Invoice 10232014 9/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 10232014 9/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/2412014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/24/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds Invoice 10232014 9/29/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9112/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/1212014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9112/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10232014 9/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10232014 10/1/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10232014 10/1/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -434 Conference & Training COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MTG- 9/29/14 $20.00 At & Alma's - S. SMITH ARROWWOOD RESORT- MGFOA CONF- $115.43 ALEXANDRIA- N. IVERSON SUPERAMERICA- GAS - TO MGFOA CONF- $31.95 ALEXANDRIA- N. IVERSON AMSCO- ANDERSON SPLIT ARM $336.42 OPERATORSIKM THE SUITES HOTEL - LODGING - AMERICAN $331.38 WATERWORKS ASSOC CONFERRENCE 9- 10 THRU 9- 12 -14- R. HANSON Project 14 -3 THE SUITES HOTEL - LODGING - AMERICAN $191.20 WATER WORKS ASSOC CONFERRENCE 9- 10 THRU 9- 12 -14- H. STRICKLEN THE SUITES HOTEL - LODGING- AMERICAN $191.21 WATER WORKS ASSOC CONFERRENCE 9- 10 THRU 9- 12 -14- B. BERENT PORTABLE POWER SYSTEMS- POWER $195.36 INVERTER SEWER DEPT AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $150.00 WORKSHP- R. HANSON Project 14 -3 AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $245.00 CONFERENCE -R. HANSON Project 14 -3 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT- SPACE $175.85 SAVER CABINET DESK- B. BUNN JENCONS SCIENTIFIC - SAFETY PIPETTE $95.26 FILLER- WATER DEPT AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $150.00 WORKSHP -C. MOORE Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $245.00 CONFERENCE -C. MOORE Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 11/14/2014 Wells Fa-- 2466- 10100 Total $2,494.06 _..._ Current Period: October 2014 Batch Name OCT14ELANCC User Dollar Amt $2,494.06 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $2,494.06 $0.00 In Balance Refer 10 ELAN CREDIT CARD Ck# 053754E 11/17/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -431 Meeting. Expense COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MTG- 9/29/14 $20.00 Al & Alma's - S. SMITH Invoice 10232014 9/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 10232014 9/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/2412014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/24/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -13100 Due From Other Funds Invoice 10232014 9/29/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9112/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/1212014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9112/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10232014 9/12/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -434 Conference & Training Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10232014 10/1/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 10232014 10/1/2014 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -434 Conference & Training COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MTG- 9/29/14 $20.00 At & Alma's - S. SMITH ARROWWOOD RESORT- MGFOA CONF- $115.43 ALEXANDRIA- N. IVERSON SUPERAMERICA- GAS - TO MGFOA CONF- $31.95 ALEXANDRIA- N. IVERSON AMSCO- ANDERSON SPLIT ARM $336.42 OPERATORSIKM THE SUITES HOTEL - LODGING - AMERICAN $331.38 WATERWORKS ASSOC CONFERRENCE 9- 10 THRU 9- 12 -14- R. HANSON Project 14 -3 THE SUITES HOTEL - LODGING - AMERICAN $191.20 WATER WORKS ASSOC CONFERRENCE 9- 10 THRU 9- 12 -14- H. STRICKLEN THE SUITES HOTEL - LODGING- AMERICAN $191.21 WATER WORKS ASSOC CONFERRENCE 9- 10 THRU 9- 12 -14- B. BERENT PORTABLE POWER SYSTEMS- POWER $195.36 INVERTER SEWER DEPT AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $150.00 WORKSHP- R. HANSON Project 14 -3 AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $245.00 CONFERENCE -R. HANSON Project 14 -3 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT- SPACE $175.85 SAVER CABINET DESK- B. BUNN JENCONS SCIENTIFIC - SAFETY PIPETTE $95.26 FILLER- WATER DEPT AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $150.00 WORKSHP -C. MOORE Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Project 14 -3 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -434 Conference & Training AMERICAN PUB WKS ASSOC MN FALL $245.00 CONFERENCE -C. MOORE Invoice 10232014 9/16/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 11/14/2014 Wells Fa-- 2466- 10100 Total $2,494.06 _..._ `'1 o i� tx:.P.4t Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: October 2014 10100 Wells Fargo $523.80 $286.47 $1,683.79 $2,494.06 Pre - Written Check $2,494.06 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $2,494.06 -2467- 11/18/141:11 PM Page 2 CITY OF MOUND 11/13/1410:59 AM ___......�,. Page 1 Payments E...PT or [? ,CAJItiD Current Period: November 2014 Batch Name 111314CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $25,416.22 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $25,416.22 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 CAPSTONEHOMES _ Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow 2223 WOODLYN RIDGE CT ESCROW $5,000.00 REFUND #2013 -00897 CAPSTONE Invoice 11132014 11/12/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow 2234 WOODLYN RIDGE CT ESCROW $5,000.00 REFUND #2014 -00626 CAPSTONE Invoice 11132014 11/1212014 Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow 2244 WOODLYN RIDGE CT ESCROW $5,000.00 REFUND #2013 -00576 CAPSTONE Invoice 11132014 11/12/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow 2240 WOODLYN RIDGE CT ESCROW $5,000.00 REFUND #2014 -00168 CAPSTONE Invoice 11132014 11/12/2014 Transaction Date 11113/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20,000.00 Refer 2 HANSON, RAY _ ..____._- _--- -- --- - -- -. —.. Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms 2014 BOOT ALLOWANCE REIMB- R. HANSON $140.00 Invoice 11132014 11/5/2014 Project 14 -5 Transaction Date 11/13/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $140.00 Refer 3 NOVAK -FLECK INC. _ Cash Payment G 101 -23150 New Construction Escrow 6260 BIRCH LN ESCROW REFUND #2014- $5,000.00 00170- NOVAK -FLECK Invoice 11132014 11/1012014 Transaction Date 11/13/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 4 PAL, AKHILESH _ Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -430 Miscellaneous PUBLIC WKS DIR SEARCH- REIMB $276.22 CANDIDATE EXPENSES- RENTAL CAR, GAS, HOTEL- A. PAL Invoice 11132014 11/10/2014 Transaction Date 11113/2014 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 602 SEWER FUND Wells Fargo 10100 10100 Wells Fargo $25,000.00 $416.22 $25,416.22 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $25,416.22 Total $25,416.22 �.I Project 14-4 Total $276.22 Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 30 BURNET RELOCATION Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5954 CHESTNUT RD UTILITY BILLING CREDIT REFUND Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 13 BURNET TITLE- EDINA Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4729 ISLANDVIEW DR REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT Total $119.31 $10.00 Total $10.00 $190.65 Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $190.65 Refer 12 BURNET TITLE- EDINA Cash Payment R601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2939 DICKENS LN REFUND UTILITY BILLING $109.39 CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11113/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.39 Refer 11 _BURNETTITLE -EDINA Cash Payment R601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1706 SHOREWOOD LN REFUND UTILITY $240.95 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.95 Refer 10 BURNET TITLE- EDINA Cash Payment R601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2147 GRANDVIEW BLVD REFUND UTILITY $307.34 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $307.34 Refer 9 BURNET TITLE - EDINA . Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2931 BRADFORD LN REFUND UTILITY $451.13 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $451.13 Refer 8 BURNETTITLE - EDINA Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2670 HALSTEAD LN REFUND UTILITY $476.84 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 -2469- CITY OF MOUND 11/17/149:47 AM .__.._.- _..... Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2014 Batch Name 112014UBREFD User Dollar Amt $7,904.03 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $7,904.03 $0.00 In Balance Refer 21 A & B TITLE LLC, TRUST ACCT _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5928 HILLCREST RD REFUND UTILITY $207.80 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $207,80 Refer 27 JOHN Cash Payment _BELOWSKI, R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 3034 BRIGHTON BLVD UTILITY BILLING $119.31 CREDIT REFUND Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 30 BURNET RELOCATION Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5954 CHESTNUT RD UTILITY BILLING CREDIT REFUND Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 13 BURNET TITLE- EDINA Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4729 ISLANDVIEW DR REFUND UTILITY BILLING CREDIT Total $119.31 $10.00 Total $10.00 $190.65 Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $190.65 Refer 12 BURNET TITLE- EDINA Cash Payment R601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2939 DICKENS LN REFUND UTILITY BILLING $109.39 CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11113/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $109.39 Refer 11 _BURNETTITLE -EDINA Cash Payment R601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1706 SHOREWOOD LN REFUND UTILITY $240.95 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.95 Refer 10 BURNET TITLE- EDINA Cash Payment R601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2147 GRANDVIEW BLVD REFUND UTILITY $307.34 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $307.34 Refer 9 BURNET TITLE - EDINA . Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2931 BRADFORD LN REFUND UTILITY $451.13 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $451.13 Refer 8 BURNETTITLE - EDINA Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2670 HALSTEAD LN REFUND UTILITY $476.84 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 -2469- CITY OF MOUND 11/17/149:47 AM -_— ..__... Page 2 *en; Payments rT OF Current Period: November 2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $476.84 Refer 7 EDINA REALTY TITLE Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2008 CLOVER CIRCLE REFUND UTILITY $316.27 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11113/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $316.27 Refer 6 EDINA REALTY TITLE _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2714 WESTEDGE BLVD REFUND UTILITY $542.71 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11113/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $542.71 Refer 14 EXECUTIVE TITLE INC. EDINA Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5545 THREE PTS BLVD REFUND UTILITY $246.40 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $246.40 Refer 17 EXECUTIVE TITLE INC -GV _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4470 WILSHIRE BLVD REFUND UTILITY $70.81 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 _ Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $70,81 Refer 15 EXECUTIVE TITLE INC. -GV Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5108 TUXEDO BLVD REFUND UTILITY $433.20 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $433,20 Refer 16 EXECUTIVETITLEINC.-GV- Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 6012 EVERGREEN RD REFUND UTILITY $352.64 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $352.64 Refer 20 FIRST FINANCIAL TITLE AGENCY Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5310 BARTLETT BLVD REFUND UTILITY $235.47 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total .... .,... .... $235.47 ..: Refer ..: 26 FITZ,JUNE Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2055 LAKESIDE LN UTILITY BILLING CREDIT $3.00 REFUND Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3.00 Refer 22 GIBRALTAR TITLEAGENC_Y, LLC Cash Payment R601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1545 BLUEBIRD LN REFUND UTILITY $127.31 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $127.31 Refer 23 GIBRALTAR TITLEAGENCY, LLC _ -2470- CITY OF MOUND 11/17/149:47 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2851 TUXEDO BLVD REFUND UTILITY $178.52 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $178.52 Refer 19 GLOBAL CLOSING - EAGAN _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2045 SHOREWOOD LN REFUND UTILITY $302.75 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $302.75 Refer 24 LAND TITLE _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5028 WOODRIDGE RD UTILITY BILLING $172.51 CREDIT REFUND Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $172.51 Refer 18 LIBERTY TITLE ESCROW - __.. -_____ Cass _ h Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5953 GUMWOOD RD REFUND UTILITY $306,42 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $306.42 Refer 25 MINNETONKA TITLE Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1555 DOVE LN UTILITY BILLING CREDIT $47.25 REFUND Invoice 11202014 11113/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.25 Refer 28 SCHEIDERHAN, DALE _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5570 TONKAWOOD UTILITY BILLING CREDIT $83.46 REFUND Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $83.46 29 SCOTT PROPERTIES, LLC _ _Refer_ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2600 TYRONE LN REFUND UTILITY BILLING $54.73 CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.73 Refer 1 TRADEMARK TITLE SVCS, INC SV _ ______.._------ - -- Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1736 SUMACH LN REFUND UTILITY BILLING $1,270.38 CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,270.38 3_ TRADEMARK TITLE SVCS, INC SV _ _Refer Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5035 EDGEWATER DR REFUND UTILITY $293.54 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $293.54 Refer 2 TRADEMARK TITLES VCS, INC SV _ _..---- --- - -- -- -- Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1601 BLUEBIRD LN REFUND UTILITY $315.75 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 -2471- CITY OF MOUND 11/17/149:47 AM - � Page 4 ilk Payments way _ -- - - -= Current Period: November 2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $315.75 Refer 5 TRADEMARK TITLE S VCS, INC SV Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2794 HALSTEAD LN REFUND UTILITY $250.93 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $250,93 Refer 4 TRADEMARK TITLE SVCS, INC_SV _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4870 ISLANDVIEW DR REFUND UTILITY $186.57 BILLING CREDIT Invoice 11202014 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186.57 Fund Summary 601 WATER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $7,904.03 $7,904.03 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $7,904.03 Total $7,904.03 -2472- CITY OF MOUND 11/20/149:55 AM _....... age ` \ Payments emu.. Current Period: November 2014 Batch Name 112514CITY User Dollar Amt $135,670.11 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $135,670.11 $0.00 In Balance Refer 42 ABDO EICKAND MEYERS, LLP _ Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -434 Conference & Training CITY GOVT AUDIT TRAINING -NOV 20,2014- $75.00 N. IVERSON Invoice 11252014 11119/2014 P024307 Transaction Date 11./20/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $75.00 Refer 26 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTIN Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Cash Payment E 401- 43114 -303 Engineering Fees CONSTRUCTION TESTING SVC 2014 $1,605.88 STREET PROJ EAST THREE PTS BLVD PW 14 -01 Invoice 64408 10/31/2014 Project PW1401 Cash Payment E 401 - 43135 -303 Engineering Fees SOIL BORINGS, REPORT 2015 STREET $4,825.00 PROJ TUXEDO BLVD PW 15 -02 Invoice 64410 10/31/2014 Project PW 1502 Cash Payment E 401- 43115 -303 Engineering Fees SOIL BORINGS, REPORT 2015 STREET $4,825.00 PROJ GRANDVIEW BLVD PW 15 -01 Invoice 64409 10131/2014 Project PW1501 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,255.88 Refer 24 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSO _ _ Cash Payment G 601 -15500 Prepaid Items MEMBERSHIP DUES 2 -1 -15 THRU 1 -31 -16 R. $155.00 HANSON Invoice 11252014 11/19/2014 Cash Payment G 602 -15500 Prepaid Items Invoice 11252014 11/19/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Refer 1 APPAREL 2000 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 32996 11/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 32996 11/3/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Refer 2 BE_NIEK PROPERTY SVCS INC. Cash Payment E 101 - 49999 -300 Professional Srvs Invoice 143830 11/4/2014 Transaction Date 8/6/2014 Refer 23 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -210 Operating Supplies MEMBERSHIP DUES 2 -1 -15 THRU 1 -31 -16 R. $155.00 HANSON Wells Fargo 10100 Total $310.00 FIELD OFFICER 4" SHOULDER EMBLEMS- $30.14 UNIFORM FIELD OFFICER 4" SHOULDER EMBLEMS- $30.13 UNIFORM Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.27 REMOVAL OF ALL BURRS & SPRAY W /ALL $100.00 KILL -1700 FINCH LN 10 -29 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.00 COFFEE MACHINE EQUIP LEASE- NOV, $45.00 DEC 2014, JAN 2015 CITY HALL Invoice 1210834 11/1/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 25 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTROO -2473- Total $45.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W545734 11/12/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W545735 11/12/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W545736 11/12/2014 Transaction Date 816/2014 Refer 3 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PyAq Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 6974 - 235901 10/1/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 235931 10/112014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 6974 - 236006 10/2/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 6974 - 236257 10/7/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 233490 -606 8/26/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 233646 8/28/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 236674 10/13/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974- 236663 10/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 6974 - 237107 10/21/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -400 Repairs & Maintenance Invoice 6974 - 237356 10/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -42115 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974 - 237356 10/24/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 237356 10/2412014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 6974 - 237371 10/24/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 6974- 237724 10/30/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Refer 27 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 11252014 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 11252014 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 11252014 11/10/2014 11/20114 9:55 AM Page 2 CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $81.22 OCT 15 - 20 2014 MOUND BAY PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $114.23 OCT 15 - 20 2014 SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC OCT 15 - $81.22 20 2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $276.67 FUEL FILTERS, OIL FILTER #605 $53.02 CREDIT FRICTION CALIPERS RETURN - $142.00 Project 14 -3 TRANS FILTER, 5W40 TURBO DSL TRUCK $61.56 OIL PLATINUM PLUG, OXYGEN SENSOR, FUEL $78.58 FILTER -PARKS #205 CREDIT DUPL PYMT - $25.72 Project 14 -3 CREDIT DUPL PYMT - 5278.00 AUTO BATTERY CORE RETURN - $17.00 AUTO BATTERY #208 WTR MAIN BREAK VAN $117.79 DEFROST 2.5 GAL, FUEL & OIL FILTERS #412 $99.56 COIL EXPEDITION- FIEL OFFICER VEHICLE $19.13 COIL EXPEDITION- FIEL OFFICER VEHICLE $19.13 AUTO BATTERY #208'02 FORD E450 VAN $117.79 OIL SERVICE STICKERS PUB WKS $4.00 VEHICLES Project 14 -3 AUTO BATTERY & CORE RETURN- PARKS $80.49 VEHICLE Wells Fargo 10100 Total $188.33 GAS SVC 9 -19 -14 TO 10 -20 -14 $143.82 GAS SVC 9 -19 -14 TO 10 -20 -14 $143.81 GAS S\lr Q -1 Q -14 TO 10 -20 -14 $260.44 -2474- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 11252014 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 11252014 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 11252014 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -383 Gas Utilities Invoice 11252014 11/10/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Refer 4 ELECTRIC PUMP Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0054064 11/512014 P024163 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Refer 6 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006595695 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006595696 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006595696 11/1012014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 1006595690 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 11/1712014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006572935 10127/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006572935 10/27/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006584310 1113/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006584310 11/3/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Refer 5 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006584309 11/3/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006584309 11/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006584309 111312014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 1006584309 11/3/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006572934 10/27/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006572934 10/2712014 11/20/14 9:55 AM Page 3 GAS SVC 9 -19 -14 TO 10- 20 -14- CENT BLDG $487,87 GAS SVC 9 -19 -14 TO 10 -20 -14 $169.77 Project 14 -3 $580.18 GAS SVC 9 -19 -14 TO 10 -20 -14 $40.57 GAS SVC 9 -19 -14 TO 10 -20 -14 DEPOT BLDG $57.35 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,303.63 MAGNETIC FLOWMETERfTRANSMITTER $4,045.73 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,045.73 MAT SVC 11 -10 -14 CENT BLDG $59.21 UNIFORM SVC 11 -10 -14 PARKS $56.31 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 11 -10 -14 $82.51 PARKS MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 11 -10 -14 LIQUOR $120.66 STORE MAT SVC 11 -17 -14 LIQUOR STORE $0.00 UNIFORM SVC 10 -27 -14 PARKS $56.31 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 10 -27 -14 $8251 PARKS SHOP SUPPLIES 11 -03 -14 PARKS $71.84 UNIFORM SVC 11 -03 -14 PARKS $50.83 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $580.18 UNIFORM SVC 11 -03 -14 $66.24 UNIFORM SVC 11 -03 -14 $69.44 UNIFORM SVC 11 -03 -14 $72.28 MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 11 -03 -14 $344.41 Project 14 -3 UNIFORM SVC 10 -27 -14 $55.83 UNIFORM SVC 10 -27 -14 $54.25 -2475- CITY OF MOUND 11/20/149:55 AM Page 4 L Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 10 -27 -14 $63.19 Invoice 1006572934 10/2712014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 10 -27 -14 $120.25 Invoice 1006572934 10/27/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $845.89 Refer 28 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment G 601 -22801 Deposits /Escrow 4" WATER METER- GRANDVIEW MIDDLE $3,050.00 SCHOOL -TO BE BILLED Invoice D201941 11/4/2014 PO 24312 Transaction Date 11119/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,050,00 Refer 8 HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPA YER S Cash Payment G 101 -23299 PELLETT -6260 BIRCH LN 1 6260 BIRCH LN RES #14 -36 ABSTRACT & $48.00 TORRENS RECORDING -HENN CTY Invoice 11252014 7/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23303 HOPKINS 5030 BARTLETT 5030 BARTLETT BLVD RES #14 -45 $48.00 ABSTRACT & TORRENS RECORDING -HENN CTY Invoice 11252014 7/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23302 Lecy 1733 Bluebird PC #14 -0 1733 BLUEBIRD LN RES #14 -44 ABSTRACT & $48.00 TORRENS RECORDING -HENN CTY Invoice 11252014 7/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23298 BENCHMARK -2308 DRIFTW 2308 DRIFTWOOD LN RES #14 -43 ABSTRACT $48.00 & TORRENS RECORDING -HENN CTY Invoice 11252014 7/31/2014 Cash Payment G 101 -23305 4861 SHORELINE #14 -10 & 4861 SHORELINE PC #14 -11 ABSTRACT & $48.00 TORRENS RECORDING -HENN CTY Invoice 11252014 10/31/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 9 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -350 Printing PRINT, MAIL -CITY CONTACT NEWS 8 PG $1,400.00 NOV, DEC, JAN 2014 -15 6,000 COPIES Invoice 666875 10/29/2014 Transaction Date 8/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,400.00 Refer 10 LAKE MINNETONKA COMM. COMM_ Cash Payment E 101 - 49840 -300 Professional Srvs 3RD QTR 2014 PEG ACCESS FEE PER $11,634.56 SUBSCRIBER Invoice 11252014 10/14/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,634.56 Refer 11 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _ _ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $57.10 OVERAGE - 10/14114 TO 11/13/14 Invoice 1858310 11/312014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - BNJ $171.61 OVERAGE - 10114/14 TO 11/13/14 Invoice 1858310 11/3/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 PW COPIER $0.00 OVERAGE CHG 1 -10 -14 TO 2 -9 -14 Invoice 1858310 11/3/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $228.71 Refer 29 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR_ _2[}76_ rMulkwGIZU0111 MF Payments Current Period: November 2014 11/20/14 9:55 AM Page 5 Cash Payment E602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER $9.59 OVERAGE CHG 10 -10 -14 TO 11 -9 -14 Invoice 1859878 11/5/2014 Project 14 -3 Transaction Date 2/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9.59 Refer 39 MCGINNIS, KEVIN ....... _.. Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits LL SLIP #34 2014 KEY DEPOSIT REF K. $100.00 MCGINNIS -2 KEYS Invoice 11252014 11/17/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Refer 31 MEDIACOM Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells Wells Fargo 10100 Total ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 11 -16 -14 THRU 12 -15 -14 Invoice 11252014 1116/2014 Transaction Date 3/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE _ $100.00 $85.90 Total $85.90 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -388 Waste Disposal -MCIS WASTEWATER SERVICES DECEMBER 2014 $51,406.04 Invoice 0001038910 1116/2014 Transaction Date 11/16/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51,406,04 Refer 13 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA _ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -460 Janitorial Services WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 10 -06 -14 $219.50 CITY HALL Invoice 928030018 10/12/2014 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 928030018 10/12/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -460 Janitorial Services Invoice 928029959 10/12/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Refer 34 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -37170 State fee - Water Invoice 11252014 11/14/2014 Transaction Date 11/1912014 Refer 14 MN/WI PLAYGROUND Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -400 Repairs & Maintenance Invoice 2014421 11/712014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Refer 15 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIO _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -124 Fire Pens Conine WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 10 -06 -14 $219.50 FIRE DEPT WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 10- 06 -14- $570.00 CENTENNIAL BLDG Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,009.00 3RD QTR 2014 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,793.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Wells Fargo 10100 Total WOOD FIBER & RUBBER TILES- 3 PTS PLAYGROUND $5,793.00 $4,310.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,310.00 NOV 2014 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $12,250.00 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 11252014 11/1/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo Refer 16 MULCH STORE, THE 10100 Total $12,250.00 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -232 Landscape Material LANDSCAPE MATERIAL- 3 PTS PARK $224.00 Invoice 16607 10/16/2014 -2477- •. •10.� Payments 11 /20/14 9:55 AM Page 6 Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 10145200 -232 Landscape Material BLACK DIRT- 3 PTS PARK $448.00 Invoice 16607 10/16/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $672.00 Refer - ...... 17 NEOPOST _... Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -400 Repairs & Maintenance ANNUAL POSTAGE ACH FEE $50.00 Invoice 472805 12/1/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 22 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS _ -------------- . Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -322 Postage OCT 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $320.17 Invoice 141042 11/14/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute OCT 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,770.82 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 141042 11/14/2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -307 Admin /Finance /Compute OCT 2014 -CIS DATA HOSTING, $1,770,82 PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT Invoice 141042 11/14/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 141042 11114/2014 Transaction Date 11/18/2014 Refer 30 PAUSCHE, CATHERINE Cash Payment E 281-45210-331 Use of personal autc Invoice 11252014 4/9/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 11252014 11/11/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -431 Meeting Expense Invoice 11252014 10/2812014 Cast-Payment E 101 - 41500 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 11252014 6/11/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11252014 5/29/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11252014 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -430 Miscellaneous Invoice 11252014 7/31/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Reefer 32 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 614851 -10 -14 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies OCT 2014- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE $320.16 Wells Fargo 10100 Total REIMS MILEAGE -LMCD MTG- DOCKS- WAYZATA C. PAUSCHE 4 -9 -14 MOUNDWEAR 2014 REIMB- C. PAUSCHE 11- 11-14 REIMS COOKIES - COSTCO OPEN ENROLLMENT STAFF MTG 10 -28 -14 C. PAUSCHE REIMS TASK CHAIR- COSTCO C. PAUSCHE ELECTION TRAINING-INDEPENDENCE- REIMS LUNCH- J. NORLANDER & C. PAUSCHE 5 -29 -14 REIMS MILEAGE - POLLING PLACE CIRCUIT C. PAUSCHE 8 -12 -14 THRU 11 -5 -14 ELECTION JUDGE TRAINING - 7 -10 -14 & 7 -31- 14 COOKIES- REIMS C. PAUSCHE Wells Fargo 10100 Total PUB WKS HOT & COLD WATER COOLER RENTAL NOV THRU JAN 2015 Project 14 -3 CITY HALL HOT & COLD WATER COOLER RENTAL NOV THRU JAN 2015 Invoice 614850 -10 -14 10/3112014 -2478- $4,181.97 $10.08 $44.10 $15.99 $266.03 $18.09 $12.88 $14.97 $382.14 $68.85 $68.85 [4I� hKOTA1TI10111kq101 Payments 11120114 9:55 AM Page 7 Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -210 Operating Supplies KANDIYOHI 5 GAL WATER & DEPOSIT- HOT $18.29 & COLD WATER COOLER- CITY MGR Invoice 603679 -10 -14 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 604558 -10 -14 10/31/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Refer 18 SIMON, STEWART Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 11252014 10/30/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 42115 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 11252014 10/30/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Refer 40 SLACK, DAN_ Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits NOV THRU JAN 2015 HOT & COLD WATER $68.85 COOLER- CENT BLDG Wells Fargo 10100 Total $224.84 STRETCHERS- MACE AEROSOL & HOLDER- $28.41 REIMB S. SIMON STRETCHERS- MACE AEROSOL & HOLDER- $28.41 REIMB S. SIMON Wells Fargo 10100 Total $56.82 LL SLIP #10 -2014 KEY DEPOSIT REF D. $50.00 SLACK Invoice 11252014 11/19/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 36 SOUTHWEST NEWSPAPERS Total $50.00 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising LIFESTYLE GUIDE FULL PG AD HARBOR $970.00 WINE & SPIRITS Invoice 1740330 10/3112014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 33 ST. PAUL, CITYOF- FINANCE SVC _ _..----.._----- - Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -224 Street Maint Materials WINTER MIX ASPHALT -10 TONS Invoice IN00005504 11/4/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 35 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY - Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE- AMEND ZONING ORD CHPT 129- 11 -15 -14 Invoice 161531 11/15/2014 $970.00 $789.80 $789.80 $34.70 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE- AMEND AMUSEMENT $19.28 LICENSING ORD 09 -2014 11 -15 -14 Invoice 161532 11115/2014 Cash Payment E 401 -43115 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE- PUB HEARING 2015 ST $53.12 IMRPOV PROD. PW15 -01 11 -08 -14 Invoice 159439 11/8/2014 Project PW1501 Cash Payment E 401- 43135 -351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE- PUB HEARING 2015 ST $53.12 IMRPOV PROJ. PW15 -02 11 -15 -14 Invoice 161530 11/15/2014 Project PW1502 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $160.22 Refer 19 TRUE VALUE HWS Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 120189 10127/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 120564 11/7/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 345519 10/3112014 TRASH BAGS, CLEANER- HWS $25.95 CABLE TIES, GLUE, ROD $18.13 OCTO"- " — ""NCE CHARGE $0.50 -2479- CITY OF MOUND 11/20/149: 55 AM _.. _.... Page 8 Payments Current Period: November 2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $44.58 Refer 20 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) _ Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply BLADES- PARKS $11.99 Invoice 119587 10/6/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -404 Machinery /Equip Repairs FG EUE BT 3/8 X 16 X 6 -10, SCREWS, NUTS $21.80 BOLTS Invoice 119587 10/6/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 41410 -210 Operating Supplies 15W FLUORESCENT BULBS- ELECTIONS $35.96 Invoice 119587 10/6/2014 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies GLOVES- SEWER DEPT $11.99 Invoice 119468 10/1/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS #605 STREETS $10.18 Invoice 119820 10/13/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts KEYS 2 $3.98 Invoice 120129 10/24/2014 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -210 Operating Supplies CORD WRAP, WIRE STRIPPER, AMNONIA, $35.73 ANTIFREEZ- WTR DEPT Invoice 120274 10/2912014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 60LB CONCRETE MIX $9.88 Invoice 120312 10/30/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $141.51 Refer 37 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 11 -11 -14 $140.04 THRU 12 -10 -2014 Invoice 9730129588 8/10/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 11 -11 -14 $46.68 THRU 12 -10 -2014 Invoice 9730129588 8/10/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 11 -11 -14 $46.68 THRU 12 -10 -2014 Invoice 9730129588 8/10/2014 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -321 Telephone & Cells DATACARD BROADBAND SVC 11 -11 -14 $81.69 THRU 12 -10 -2014 Invoice 9730129588 8110/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $315.09 Refer 41 WINTER, DON Cash Payment G 281 -22000 Deposits LL SLIP #23 -2014 KEY DEPOSIT REF D. $50.00 WINTER Invoice 11252014 11/19/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ,..,. $50.00 Refer 21 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities MAYWOOD RD STREET LIGHTS- 10 -3 -14 TO $5,124.26 11 -2 -14 Invoice 433461905 11/3/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total " "... .... $5,124.26 ... Refer 38 XCELENERGY Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9125/14 TO 10/25/14 $123.79 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -381 Electric Utilities ELECT ... .... 9/25/14 TO 10125/14 $43.92 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $135,670.11 Total $135,670.11 -2481- CITY OF MOUND 11/20/149:55 AM ___—...__....._...... Page 9 Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25114 TO 10/25/14 $2,920.89 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25/14 TO 10/25/14 $1,804.50 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25/14 TO 10/25114 $1,010.95 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25/14 TO 10/25/14 $1,456.60 Invoice 434938856 11113/2014 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25/14 TO 10/25/14 $1,005.71 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25/14 TO 10/25/14 $1,005.72 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25/14 TO 10/25/14 $990,41 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9125/14 TO 10/25/14 $1,449.11 Invoice 434938856 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9/25/14 TO 10/25/14 $41.90 Invoice 434938856 11113/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,853.50 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $32,331.78 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $13,759.07 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $210.08 285 MOUND HRA $1,449.11 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $11,362.12 601 WATER FUND $12,524.61 602 SEWER FUND $61,400.93 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $2,632.41 $135,670.11 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $135,670.11 Total $135,670.11 -2481- k Batch Name 112514HWS Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 User Dollar Amt $86,494.50 Computer Dollar Amt $86,494.50 11/20/14 10:22 AM Page 1 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $57.60 Invoice 385431508 11/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $1.00 Invoice 385431508 11/11/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $58.60 Refer 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $425.20 Invoice 3004142 11/4/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $425.20 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS, c -fold towels Invoice 91070400 11/5/2014 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE- NFL MUGS Invoice 91070400 11/5/2014 11/5/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 45576900 11/5/2014 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 45576900 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 45636500 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 91094300 11/10/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 45716300 11/14/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 45716300 11114/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 45735500 11/17/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 174907 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 174908 11/5/2014 Transaction Date 1 111 7/2 01 4 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 33 COCA COLABOTTLING- MIDWEST _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA SOFT DRINK PRODUCTS Invoice 0178056312 11/18/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 6 DAHLHEIMERBEVERAGELLC _ _2482- Total $184.32 $42.84 $227.16 $79.58 $6,932.66 $3,009.25 $29.00 $1,929.11 $17.31 $7,430.94 Total $19,427.85 $55.53 $707.37 Total $762.90 $300.40 Total $300.40 Refer 10 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment CITY OF MOUND BEER Invoice 2293211 11/20/1410:22 AM _..._.__....� Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 2293212 11/11/2014 Page 2 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Payments Invoice 2276861 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT- PRICE REDUCTION Invoice 2276856 11/13/2014 E QT 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $442.00 Invoice 1133960 11/5/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $442.00 Refer 7 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,418.70 Invoice 777915 11/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $107.50 Invoice 777916 11/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $164.40 Invoice 778349 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,690.60 Refer 8 ENKI BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $230.00 Invoice 3283 11/5/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.00 Refer 9 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $819.92 Invoice 732543 11/1212014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $819.92 Refer 10 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 60949750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 2293211 11/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 2293212 11/11/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -PRICE REDUCTION Invoice 2276861 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT- PRICE REDUCTION Invoice 2276856 11/13/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 5025490 11112/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 5025490 11112/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 501763 10/24/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale Invoice 501762 10/24/2014 LIQUOR WINE WINE CREDIT WINE CREDIT $2,586.55 $38.80 - $50.00 - $51.00 Total $2,524.35 $4,584.05 $3,577,70 - $58.65 $38.85 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 vvens cargo iuiUU IMal Refer 11 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 5020420 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 5020418 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 5020419 11/5/2014 -2483- $8,064.25 $22.25 $6,572.25 $2,969.60 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 11/20/14 10:22 AM Page 3 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $283.50 Invoice 5020805 11/612014 E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising Invoice 12639 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,847.60 Refer 13 LITURGICAL PUBLICATIONS, INC. _ Invoice 29957 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising ADVERTISING ST. JOHN'S LUTHERAN $325.00 10/20/2014 Cash Payment NEWSLETTER MOUND- 11 -1 -14 THRU 10 -15- Invoice 29982 10/2312014 Cash Payment 15 Invoice 29990 Invoice 11252014 11/3/2014 Transaction Date 11/18/2014 Refer 14 LUCID BREWING Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -340 Advertising Invoice 12639 10/27/2014 Transaction Date 11/18/2014 Refer 15 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29957 10116/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29964 10/20/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29982 10/2312014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 29990 10/27/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 30007 10/30/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 30008 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 30034 11110/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight Invoice 30049 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Refer 16 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -412 Building Rentals Wells Fargo 10100 Total $325.00 T- SHIRTS -TONKA BREWFEST 11 -01 -14 $64.57 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.57 DELIVERY SVC 10 -16 -14 $255.15 DELIVERY SVC 10 -20 -14 DELIVERY SVC 10 -23 -14 DELIVERY SVC 10 -27 -14 DELIVERY SVC 10 -30 -14 DELIVERY SVC 11 -06 -14 DELIVERY SVC 11 -10 -14 DELIVERY SVC 11 -13 -14 Wells Fargo 10100 DEC 2014 COMMON AREA MTCE & INSURANCE HWS Invoice 11252014 12/1/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 17 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS— Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic NOV 2014 MUSIC SERVICE- HWS Invoice 51105288 11/1/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 18 PARLEY LAKE WINERY Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 14101 11/6/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 19 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 8473733 11/10/2014 -2484- $36.25 $175.90 $53.65 $202.50 $280.85 $39.15 $289.25 Total $1,332.70 $1,045.50 Total $1,045.50 $116.15 Total $116.15 $309.00 Total $309.00 $689.31 CITY OF MOUND 11/20114 10:22 AM .... _._.__.- Page 4 Payments Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $13.75 Invoice 8473733 11/10/2014 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $57.00 Invoice 8474873 11/17/2014 E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8474873 11/17/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,353.46 Invoice 8474862 11/17/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $22.50 Invoice 8474862 11/17/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,138,27 Refer 21 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,033.15 Invoice 2694415 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $982.30 Invoice 2694414 1115/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT - MOSCATA - $52.40 Invoice 202016 11/5/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,963.05 Refer 20 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $795.25 Invoice 2697770 11/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $674.65 Invoice 2697771 11/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $56.00 Invoice 2697772 11/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R 2 GINGER BIG GLASSWARE $140.00 Invoice 2683617 10/15/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,665.90 Refer 34 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -340 Advertising 11 -15 -14 EDITION -WINE SPECTATOR $15.00 MAGAZINES Invoice SO406083 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -340 Advertising 11 -30 -14 EDITION -WINE SPECTATOR $15.00 MAGAZINES Invoice SO410483 1116/2014 Transaction Date 11/19/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 22 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OFM Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1221948 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1221949 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1221947 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 9045644 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1224305 11113/2014 -2485- Total $30.00 $1,252.00 $810.36 $0.0D 12.25 $2,086.49 OF MOUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2014 11 /20/14 10:22 AM Page 5 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,670.53 Invoice 1224306 11113/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,352.95 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,817.13 Refer 23 ST. CLOUD REFRIGERATION, INC _ BEER Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REFRIGERATION & HEATING MTCE - $403.99 11117/2014 Cash Payment REPLACE AIR FILTERS 10 -24 -14 BEER Invoice 290196 10/3112014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -404 Machinery /Equip Repairs REPLACE HEAT EXCHANGER & IND DDRAFT $2,948.96 MOTOR, BURNERS & PLATES 10 -28 -14 Invoice 290705 11/13/2014 WINE Invoice 556 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,352.95 Refer 24 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,644.45 Invoice 859032 11/11/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $62.55 Invoice 858654 11/6/2014 LIQUOR Invoice 0110732 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $295.00 Invoice 858912 11/7/2014 11/6/2014 Transaction Date 11/1712014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,002.00 Refer 25 TKO WINES, INC Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 556 11/7/2014 E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 26 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic REGISTER PRINTER RIBBONS Invoice 52390 11/3/2014 Transaction Date 11117/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 27VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0110732 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 0110733 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0111389 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 0111390 11/13/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT Invoice 0110201 CM 11/4/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Invoice 0110201 CM 11/4/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 28 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 376627 1116/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 376627 11/6/2014 Cash Payment Invoice 377225 E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE 11/13/2014 -2486- $180.00 Total $180.00 $5,369.75 Total $5,369.75 $995.25 $40.00 $732.67 $56.00 -$250 - $99.25 Total $1,722.17 $312.00 $6,30 $256.00 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1410: 22 AM Page 6 4 Y Pa meets Current Period: November 2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $4.20 Invoice 377225 11/1312014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $578.50 Refer_ 29 WINE MERCHANTS _ _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $84,00 Invoice 7005610 11/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $647.50 Invoice 7004619 11/512014 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $23.00 Invoice 7005611 11/12/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $754.50 Refer 30 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,168.45 Invoice 1090313675 11/512014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $69.30 Invoice 1090313676 11/5/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,911.05 Invoice 1090316900 11/12/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $62,20 Invoice 1090316981 11/12/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,211.00 Refer 31 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,446.32 Invoice 1080249062 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,212.71 Invoice 1080249061 11/6/2014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $436.00 Invoice 1080252546 11/1312014 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,600.50 Invoice 1080252545 11113/2014 Transaction Date 11/17/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,695.53 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $86,494.50 $86,494.50 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $86,494.50 Total $86,494.50 UM MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES October 28, 2014 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, October 28, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Hanus; Council members Mark Wegscheid, Kelli Gillispie and Ray Salazar Members absent: Heidi Gesch Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Fin Dir /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Rita Trapp, Carlton Moore, Dan Faulkner, John Colotti, Jay Green, Laura Mattioli, Justin Rock, Noah Sweet, Jeff Flattum, Max Brecke, Craig Rose, Sandy Kennedy, Caleb Fetters, Anders Larson, Zach Kloh, Mike, Herd, Connie Meyer, Blake Rosenberg, Cameron Briarly, Shaun Shansen, Bob Lien, Sam Owens, Nate Owens, Kelvin Retterath, taylor Miller, Alexandar Hayes, Jacquie Ziegler. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Hanus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Hanson requested Item 4E be amended to read 1586 Bluebird instead of 1568 Bluebird. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent Agenda Hanson requested the removal of item 4G until a future meeting. Hanus requested Item 4D and 4F be pulled for discussion. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $417,763.89. B. Cancel regular meeting set for Dec. 23, 2014 C. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -86: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONTINUANCE OF THE LANGDON AREA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRCIT PARKING PROGRAM FOR 2014 -2015. D. Pulled. Mound City Council Minutes — October 28, 2014 RESOLUTION NO. 14 -87: RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 1586 BLUEBIRD LANE. F. Pulled. G. Removed. Mayor Hanus asked for this item to be pulled in order to add another condition. Hanus stated it is always a good idea to have many and strong findings in planning cases. Hanus requested page 2238 item #5 be added to read as follows: The unusually wide boulevard at this location further minimizes the impact of the variance. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar to approve Consent Agenda Item 4D as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -88: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 5168 TUXEDO BOULEVARD PID NO, 24- 117 -24 -34 -0003 4F. Approve Consent and Joinder for Third Amendment to Declaration of Mound Market Place Hanus asked for item 4F to be pulled for discussion. Sarah Smith stated a request was made to create a new unit to allow for the possible sale of Jubilee Foods to the occupant, similar to Harbor Wine and Spirits and Westonka Animal Hospital. Planner Trapp said the only reason City involved is because it is a party to the agreement. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Salazar, to approve the Consent and Joinder for Third Amendment to Declaration of Mound Market Place. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. Comm None were Faulkner stated that on September 23, 2014, the Council ordered an engineering feasibility report and that the Bartlett Boulevard water main will be replaced in three phases from 2014 — 2016. Phase II for 2015 includes the section of Commerce Boulevard to the Lost Lake outlet bridge and will use pipe bursting and trenchless technology once again. Faulkner stated that 20 service hook ups /curb stops and three hydrants will be replaced and that this project is being proposed in anticipation of the county's mill and overlay of the road. Mound City Council Minutes — October 28, 2014 Faulkner summarized the estimated cost of $434,460, including a 5% contingency, and 20% indirect for a total of $521,350. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -89: RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR BARTLETT BOULEVARD WATERMAIN REPLACEMENT, COMMERCE BOULEVARE TO LOST LAKE BRIDGE, CITY PROJECT NO. PW -15 -09 7. John Colotti Liquor Store Manager, requesting uiscubbiv1ua�uU11 vn I_Xwv.ULIW,. Authorizing a Liquor Lighting Retrofit Project Colotti stated the current 12 year old fixtures take T8 70'770 watt fluorescent bulbs. Colotti said the trend is to replace fluorescent with LED lighting. A total of 46 bulbs are needed for all of the fixtures. Colotti stated the proposal is to replace the fixtures with a 5 foot LED strip that should last about 20 years. Colotti said because the existing bulbs are on the doors, they are subject to more wear and tear, break easily, and have to be specially recycled. Colotti said the vendor will apply for the rebate of $100 per door directly, thereby reducing the City's upfront cost. Hanus clarified the annual savings in electricity is estimated to be $3,100 less. Salazar estimated the pay -back is 6 years for the cost of the new fixtures, but that will be reduced by the savings in electric expense. Gillispie ask to confirm the City will require the vendor to apply for the rebate and Colotti said yes. The resolution was omitted from the packet, and Colotti passed around the resolution from a prior packet. Hanus asked the not to exceed number to be stated as $5,600. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the following resolution as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -90: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A LIQUOR LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT 8. Jay Green representative to LMCD requesting discussion on public hearing on quiet Green stated a request was received for a quiet waters area near Three Points. Green explained the LMCD process for responding to the request and asked if the Council has any input. Green stated after the request was made, staff conducted observations which the public safety committee reviewed and called for a public hearing on November 12, 2014 in Wayzata City Hall. Green stated a direct mail campaign was conducted to inform people on the affected shoreline and publications were made to advertise the hearing. Green stated the LMCD chose safety and not environmental /erosion since environmental issues occur all over the lake. Green said that basically the same request was made in 1997, and the �•1 Mound City Council Minutes — October 28, 2014 Sheriff made a recommendation for a portion to be a quiet zone, but that was not approved by the LMCD. In 2014, Staff went out 6 times to observe and has made a recommendation not to approve. The possible outcomes from the hearing would be to (1) adopt the change (2) dismiss or (3) make alterations. Hanus said he appreciated the opportunity for feedback. Hanus said his feeling is things should not be changed unless there is a very good reason to change it. He feels if the LMCD were to adopt the change, it should extend to the existing no -wake zone instead of having a narrow lane in between. Wegscheid stated if anything, the 1997 Sheriff recommendation should be considered. Gillispie asked if any incidents were reported in the area and Green said the Sherriff did not note any incidents. Gillispie stated she is very familiar with the area and does not see the necessity, with perhaps the exception of Derring Island since the passing is narrow. Salazar said changes should be made for safety, and he sees no reason in this case. 9. Planning Commission Recommendations A. Planning Case No. 14 -23: Public Lands Permit and Variances Property: 4730 Galway Road Applicant: Justin Rock Requested Actions: 1. Action on Resolution to Approve a Public Lands Permit from Justin Rock for 4730 Galway Road 2. Action on Resolution Approving Variance for 4730 Galway Road Smith stated to create access via an undeveloped road and installing utilities requires a Public Lands Permit. Smith stated the improvements will be made on north side and that the Planning commission made a unanimous recommendation to approve. Hanus was asked why vacating the road was not considered. Smith stated the unimproved roadway provides access to commons. Smith said to vacate roads that extend to public water requires DNR approval and they typically prefer right of way be preserved. Hanus stated the City could retain an easement and even create a path to the lake. Smith said the debate was had and Staff saw value and a public purpose for retaining it. Hanus stated he was just looking for the cleanest path. Salazar asked what is involved in vacating. Smith stated vacation triggers State Statute and must be routed to the Department of Natural Resources for approval. Smith said the applicant is aware of both options. Justin Rock, 4730 Galway Road, stated he would prefer the road to be vacated, but wanted the simpler path since it is a condition of the financing and the closing is set for Friday. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -91: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR PROPERTY AT 4730 GALWAY ROAD PID 19- 117 -23 -23 -0139 Smith stated that since direct abutting frontage to a developed road is typically required, a variance is required for that and the reduced front set -back. Smith noted that the lot is conforming in terms of lot size and Lakeshore. Staff supported the reduced setback with conditions. -2491- Mound City Council Minutes — October 28, 2014 Smith stated some favorable items to note are that the plan is for a single level walk -out and only a portion of the structure requires the front set -back. The Planning Commission asked the set -back be at a minimum of 6 foot front setback to be similar to the side setback and that only 20% of the structure be allowed to be in the variance area. In addition, reasonable use, impact on neighbors, and fit within neighborhood was discussed. All Planning Commissioners voted in favor with exception of one who wanted a 10 foot front setback. Smith noted a revised resolution was distributed to the Council. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the following resolution, as amended. Hanus offered a friendly amendment to replace the stricken item 15 with the new item 15. Motion makers accepted the friendly amendment. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -92: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR 4730 GALWAY ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -23 PID 19- 117 -23 -23 -0139. B. Presentation /discussion from Planning Commissioner Kelvin Retterath regarding stormwater management techniques and accessory dwelling units Retterath is a Planning Commissioner who practices in the residential /architectural field. Retterath stated he would like to encourage a discussion of accessory dwelling units (ADU) and stated he has been working on some of them in other communities who have embraced them as it keeps people in town and their expenditures local. Bloomington specifically requires the ADU to look like part of the main house which creates a new housing unit that respects the character of single family dwellings. Retterath suggested a limit of one ADU per property. Retterath stated ADUs make more efficient use of existing infrastructure and provide for independent living by essentially adding a 360 feet studio apartment for a potential caregiver, grandparent, and /or renter. Retterath stated owner occupation of the main living space is key to deterring problems and keeping rental income local. Retterath noted Mound's code currently requires a single family minimum of 840 square feet, which requires a significant investment. Retterath is requesting the Council to direct Staff to look into what other cities are doing and come back with recommendations, similar to the parking study. Hanus asked about restrictions on minimum lot size. Retterath responded that Bloomington ADUs can't be larger than principal structure. Hanus asked if all ADUs are attached to the principal sturcture and Retterath said it open to debate. Hanus asked if each unit had to maintain its own standards or if code would be adapted specifically for ADUs. Hanus said he has been against the concept because the City has ample rental already and it could encourage people to build storage units on small lots, creating problems. Hanus said he tries to consider the impact on the neighborhood and the need for variances when we are already granting so many as it is. Wegscheid said it is not guaranteed to raise property value and may impact marketability. Retterath stated most concerns could be handled with the design which can address convertibility back to a primary home and Bloomington's code addresses that. Wegscheid stated that Planning Commissioner Gawtry, who works for the City of Maple Grove, said he found it to be a significant burden on Staff. Trapp noted Bloomington has a rental ordinance as well and Mound does not. Retterath said the City can require additional parking stalls. -2492- Mound City Council Minutes — October 28, 2014 Hanus stated he does not want to further burden staff unless there is significant interest on the part of Council. Wegscheid stated he would not support it at this time due to burden on staff and tax on infrastructure. Salazar stated it was an interesting idea, but that he does not want to saddle staff. Salazar said he would be open to Retterath looking into if further. Gillispie thanked Retterath for his work and stated that she learned a lot, but that she is not hearing that there is a demand in the community right now and that there are competing priorities. Hanus agreed with Gillispie and stated perhaps in the future. Retterath went on to discuss storm water management techniques and hardcover restrictions. Retterath stated underground drain fields could be used as an alternative to impervious pavers, which is more affordable. Smith stated the hardcover calculation does require storm water management. Currently, an engineered pervious paver drive -way is the standard. Smith said verifiable standards have to be developed and that engineers have to sign off on it. It was noted that the City has already worked with the Watershed District on some new technologies, including the Wolner Field parking lot. Mayor Hanus directed staff to research alternatives and bring back options to the Council. 10. Kandis Hanson City Manager requesting discussionlaction on: A. An Ordinance Amending Chapter 10 of the Mound City Code as it Relates to Amusements Hanson said this is updated language that was inadvertently removed during the 2009 recodificiation and is needed in order to allow the City to permit music after the 10:00 pm noise ordinance. MOTION by Hanus, failed a second. Wegscheid asked about the concerns raised during the last discussion about repeat offenders. Hanson said any violation of the City Code is a misdemeanor. Gillispie is aware of an individual who continued to call to complain but the Police did not agree that it was in violation so that could be a problem, too. Discussion ensued and it was determine the police would have to deal with those instances. MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the following Ordinance, as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE 09 -2014: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO AMUSEMENTS B. Resolution Authorizing Publication of An Ordinance by Title and Summary, as it Relates to Amusements MOTION by Hanus, seconded by Wegscheid, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 14 -93: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY, AS IT RELATES TO AMUSEMENTS 11. Information /Miscellaneous -2493- Mound City Council Minutes — October 28, 2014 A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager Hanson called attention to item 11 D to acknowledge the Beises' retirement after many years of dedicated service, including founding the Spirit of the Lakes Festival organization. Hanson wants to encourage the public to make contact with the Beises or her if they are interested in serving on the Spirit of the Lakes Festival Board. Hanson stated there is another special event at Harbor Wine and Spirits on December 3'd which is the Repeal of Prohibition Sale. B. Minutes: Planning Commission — Sept. 2, 2014 C. Reports: Finance Department— Sept. YTD Update on FEMA reimbursement effort — Oct. 2, 2014 Harbor Wine & Spirits — Oktoberfest & Sept. YTD Met Council Housing Performance Scores D. Correspondence: Beises' retirement from Spirit of the Lakes Festival 12. Adiourn MOTION by Wegscheid, seconded by Gillispie, to adjourn at 9:14 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -2494- Mayor Mark Hanus 99. j Consulting Engineers & Surveyors 1'� } 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 —° www,bolton- menk.com November 19, 2014 Ms. Kandis IIanson, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2014 Seal Coat Project City Project No. PW -14 -07 Pay Request No. 2 and Final Dear Ms. Hanson: PIease find enclosed the original Invoice from Allied Blacktop Company for work completed on the 2014 Seal Coat Project. At the time of receipt of this invoice, the second sweeping had not yet been done. It was subsequently completed the first week of September. I recommend payment in the amount of $2,500.00 to Allied Blacktop Company for completion of the required second sweeping. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an equal opportunity employer -2495- INVOICE N-0. 19527 PAGE 1 UNIT EXTENDED QUANTITY D E S C R I P T 1 0 N PRICE PRICE .. .... .... 1.00 2014 SEAL COAT PROJECT 69588.0000 69,588.00 dl Soo, cz) 1) MOBILIZATION: IS I $2,000.00 2) TRAFFIC CONTROL: LS 1 = (70 $2,700,00 3) STREET SWEEPING: LS 1 = $6,000.00 4) SECOND SWEEPING: LS 1 $2,500.00 4�wc, 5) BITUMINOUS SEAL COAT: 44,400 SY @ 1.27 = $56,388.00 GROSS RETAINAGE TAX 69,588.00 .00 .00 p.s -2496- NET AMOUNT 69,588.00 ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY r( E31TUNIINOUS CONTRACTORS 10503 891 H,,VF.NLJF NORI, H MAPLI GROV-, MINNESOTA 55369 j 7i IHGNI, Q63)149 I-0575 INVOICE N-0. 19527 PAGE 1 UNIT EXTENDED QUANTITY D E S C R I P T 1 0 N PRICE PRICE .. .... .... 1.00 2014 SEAL COAT PROJECT 69588.0000 69,588.00 dl Soo, cz) 1) MOBILIZATION: IS I $2,000.00 2) TRAFFIC CONTROL: LS 1 = (70 $2,700,00 3) STREET SWEEPING: LS 1 = $6,000.00 4) SECOND SWEEPING: LS 1 $2,500.00 4�wc, 5) BITUMINOUS SEAL COAT: 44,400 SY @ 1.27 = $56,388.00 GROSS RETAINAGE TAX 69,588.00 .00 .00 p.s -2496- NET AMOUNT 69,588.00 lk �l.,� Consulting Engineers & Surveyors `� � 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 •Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 a ., -- Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 �'° -•—�� www.bolton-menk.com November 19, 2014 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2014 Drainage Improvement Project City Project No. PW -14 -04 Pay Request No. I Dear Ms. Hanson: S Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 1 from Schneider Excavating & Grading, Inc. for work completed on the 2014 Drainage Improvement Project from October 6, 2014 through November 14, 2014. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $74,139.90 to Schneider Excavating & Grading, Inc. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. t }�...�Z�Z- 'UL.V.. t / _. , •:�l fL.C..t J;'.:J. %G, L't.... Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer cc: Carlton Moore, Director of Public Works Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance -2497- DATE: 11/19/2014 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO CONTRACTOR Schneider Excavating 2014 DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS OWNER City of Mound CITY PROJECT NOS. PW -14 -04 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk BMI PROJECT NO. C12.106985 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM _ 10/612014 _THROUGH 11/14/2014 TOTALAMOUNT BID.,.........._ .. .......... ............. _.._.... ._.,...... . .... _ ....... ......... $ 90415.00 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS ............. ..._.... _. .... ................. ... ...... . $ CURRENT CONTRACT AMOUNT .._ ........................ .................... _. ... ... .... ..... ... _.. $ 90,415.00 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE._...._ ....... _....._.... ...__. ... .......... ............. ........... $ 78,042.00 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE........ . _....._ ___...._. ...... .. DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED .. ...... ... ..... ....... ....... .......,. ................... .. $ TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS_ ........................................_._....,.... .....__._.........__......__... $ 78,042.00 RETAINED PERCENTAGE ( 5% ) .........._........._..__,_ ........................... ................ ....... ,........ ,..... .... $ 3,902.10 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS ....... ........ ._._....,......, ....... ...,...... ............ ....... ,.... ,.. ....... ........ .......... .... $ NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE ._... .......... ......_.. ............. .......... ... .... . ........ ..... .......,.. $ 74,139.90 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES..... — .... ........ ..... .... .... .......... .. _.._ $ PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. L.._. ........ ... ............. ...... ... ...... _........................... .........__... _.. $ 74,139.90 Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor- Schneider Excavating & Grading PO Box 814 Norwood Young America, MN 55368 2 Date CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT. BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 By °c��'7ic- L.�,�f i'r1 '4 7?L (rr'+:.a t , PROJECT ENGINEER Daniel L. Faulkner j Date i t APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND Z Ma. 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director Date: November 20,2014 Re: Proposed Ordinance Amendment to City Code Chapter 42 (Nuisances) Staff has prepared the proposed ordinance amendment to Sec. 42 -5 of the City Code to allow for nuisance matters to be enforced by the Community Development Department in addition to the Orono Police Department since many of these duties are handled by the Community Development Director and Field Officer. Staff considers the proposed amendment to be housekeeping in nature and recommends approval. -2499- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE -2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 42 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO NUSIANCES The City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. Section 42 -5 of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add the following new underlined text and to delete the stricken text as follows: Sec. 42 -5. Duties of city officers. The Police and Community Development Departments shall enforce the provisions relating to nuisances. Such efficers Department staff shall have the power to inspect private premises and to take all reasonable precautions to prevent the commission and maintenance of public nuisances. Passed by the City Council this _ day of 2014 Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Published in the Laker the of 12014. Effective the day of 12014. -2500- 452831vI MJM MU220 -2 W ) rAAL cuw or nioun�. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consultant Planner November 19, 2014 14 -24 Variance 2217 Chateau Lane (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -43 -0059) Low Density Residential R -2 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The City Council will consider an application for a variance to allow the construction of single - family home on an undersized, existing lot of record. The 4,788 square foot property is located on the west side of Chateau Lane just north of Shoreline Drive. A variance is needed for the construction of a home on this property because Section 129 -6 of Zoning Code states that a lot of record in a residential district may be used for residential purposes as long as it meets the setbacks and minimum lot area requirements. The R -2 zoning district requires a minimum 6,000 square foot lot. While the lot is undersized, the applicant is proposing to construct a conforming, two -story house. Details regarding the application are contained in the Planning Report which has been included as an attachment. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their November 18, 2014 meeting. Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. -2501- MINUTE EXCERPTS • �� • • • NOVEMBER Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Doug Gawtry. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Brian Oberman, 2174 Overland La; Pete Wiechert, 1377 Gull La; Jason Baker, 1784 Jones La; Josh Dunwoody, 6116 Bartlett Blvd; Tom Betz, 300 Crestview, Long Lake; Mark Lee, 2020 Bellaire La.; Barry Robbins, 3036 Highland Blvd. Council members: Mayor Hanus, Heidi Gesch and Ray Salazar. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -24 Variance 2217 Chateau Lane Applicant: Tom Beta Trapp introduced the request of a variance to allow the construction of a new single- family home on an undersized, existing lot of record. The proposed dwelling will be built conforming to the requirements of the zoning district. Tom Betz, Long Lake, MN - confirmed that there would be no setback or hardcover variances requested. MOTION by Stone, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the variance with Staff recommendations 1 -8 and findings of fact 1 -4. MOTION carried unanimously. 2502- RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 2217 CHATEAU LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -24 PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -43 -0059 WHEREAS, the applicant, Betz Builders, is requesting on behalf of the property owner, Lynne Bedell, a variance to allow the construction of a new single - family home on an existing, undersized lot of record; and WHEREAS, Section 129 -6 states that a lot of record in a residential may be used for residential dwelling purposes provided the area meets all setback and minimum lot requirements, and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -2 single - family residential and the minimum lot area requirement is 6,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, the property as platted is only 4,788 square feet; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to build a conforming, two -story home with attached garage; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. -2503- ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the November 18, 2014 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant, and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 18, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend Council approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its November 25, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met 2. The construction of a single- family home is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The property was platted for single - family residential purposes prior to the establishment of current zoning regulations. 4. While undersized, a conforming home can be built on the property. -2504- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: 1. As there is no sewer or water stubbed into this lot, applicant shall be responsible for all Water Area Charges (WAC), Sewer Area Charges (SAC), and sewer connection fees at the time of building permit issuance. 2. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 8. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: (to be inserted) Adopted by the City Council this 25`h day of November, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -2505- n fITYOF MOUN6 ... DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director November 13, 2014 14 -24 Variance 2217 Chateau Lane (PID NO. 13- 117 -24 -43 -0059) Low Density Residential R -2 Single Family Residential t xt 7 A x1 xi BACKGROUND The applicant, Betz Builders, is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a new single - family home on an undersized, existing lot of record. The application is being made on behalf of the property owner, Lynne Bedell, for the property at 2217 Chateau Lane. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 25e) fi - According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on September 30, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be October 1, 2014. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around November 14, 2014 to inform them of the variance request. SITE INFORMATION The 4,788 square foot property is located on the west side of Chateau Lane just north of Shoreline Drive. Currently vacant, the property is about 40 feet wide by 119 feet long. According to Hennepin County records the applicant has owned the property since 2001. As shown in the materials provided, the applicant is proposing to construct a conforming, two - story home with attached garage. The following table summarizes the dimensions: -2QQ7- Required Proposed Variance Front Yard 20 feet 24.3 feet - Rear Yard 15 feet 45 feet - Side Yard (south) 6 feet 10 feet - Side Yard (north) 6 feet 6 feet - Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 1,915 sq. ft. 1,697 sq. ft. - -2QQ7- STAFF /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Ray Hanson, Public Works Water and sewer are not stubbed into the lot so all WAC and SAC Superintendent will apply. Melissa Manderschied, Please note that not all the lots on this block are the same size. City Attorney There are three double lots on the full block. Greg Pederson, There are no fire code concerns or issues with this variance Fire Chief request. DISCUSSION A variance is being requested because the lot is under the minimum 6,000 square feet lot size as is required by Section 129 -6 of the City Code. Sec. 129 -6. Existing lots of record. A lot of record in a residential district may be used for residential dwelling purposes provided: (1) The area thereof meets all setback and minimum lot area requirements of this chapter. In the shoreland management area, all singlefamily detached lots shall have a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feetin the R -1A and R -2 districts and 10,000 square feet in the R -1 district, while all two-family and twin homes in the R -2 district shall be located on lots having a minimum area of 14,000 square feet. (2) It has frontage on an improved public right-of-way. (3) it was under separate ownership from abutting lands upon or prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived. This property is an existing lot of record that was platted prior to the establishment of current zoning regulations. Some of the homes in the immediate vicinity are also on undersized lots. In particular, the homes on either side of this property are under 5,000 square feet in size and were built in the 1920s. The applicant is proposing to build a house that is conforming to setback and hardcover limitations. This will be confirmed during the building permit process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION in accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a variance to construct a home on an undersized existing lot of record subject to the following conditions: -2�08- 1. As there is no sewer or water stubbed into this lot, applicant shall be responsible for all payment of one (1) Trunk Water Area Charge, one (1) Trunk Sewer Area Charge (SAC), one (1) water connection fee, and one (1) sewer connection fee at the time of building permit issuance. The amount to be collected shall be the amounts in place at time of permit issuance. The required MCES SAC payment will also be collected at the time of building permit issuance. 2. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 8. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. in recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. The construction of a single - family home is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The property was platted for single - family residential purposes prior to the establishment of current zoning regulations. -2509- 4. While undersized, a conforming home can be built on the property. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the tentative meeting date is Tuesday, November 25, 2014 with an alternate meeting date of December 9, 2014. - 25z10- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit [.required at time of application. Planning Commission Date 1UDt� Case No. City Council Date Please t e or print legibly SUBJECT A Address J,21 7 C Ly'A-� e— PROPERTY I p LEGAL DESC. S Lot I PID # 13-11J` ^ � / — �J - 0 —S7V zoning: R R2 1 R1A R3 Bt 82 33 (Circle one) Lyy/V e E)eu c--' ri Email HOMES PROPERTY N Name L Address t qSD- Phone Home Work , ,2Fax q APPLICANT N Name - (IF OTHER C Cl�(,t[C�cz> Y�zs / UScII�tl�5�� THAN A OWNER) P Phone Home 1 q �3��Work 40 - 22 1-,9 Fax W%�- use r�� 11 L, 1 cvimiy P vvcw c for this property? Yes( ) No (k. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution numbers) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): 9-out' 0- variance Information (10/2112013) Page 4 of 6 -2 §11- Case No. I, `t -Z 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No +j_ ��') if no, specify each non- conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, tc.): L 51 z(f SETBACKS: ( ) topography REQUIRED (y) too small REQUESTED VARIANCE ( ) too shallow ( ) shape O other: specify (or existing) Front Yard: { N S &) ft. Side Yard: Os E W) YJ ft. ft. '� ft. Side Yard: ( NOSE W) 1 ft. _ _ t — ft. ft. Rear Yard: (N S E N %� ft. ft. / ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: �} ft, 116t 13 ft. ft• Lot Size: 60500 sq ft % sq ft %c %2 sq ft Hardcover: 716' sq ft 469 `tY s ft '� sq ft �a 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No N if no, specify each non - conforming use: L- c �_ �; }Z.(!�!- 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography () soil (y) too small ( ) drainage () existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape O other: specify Please describe: Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -21J2- Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes O, No If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No ( }. If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 7q/) Win= TGtis l 1 ccx Ake %la m 0 I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Variance Int (10/2112013� ay- - — -251a- Date jO t 1 ",I DateL� i ®,� i � u L2 q� G1i N C> E- C.) C) I - - - - - - - - - - - iL - - - - - - - - - - _1 L- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — LI "Id -2§1r - udi 0j, 16R ��-� u�u a tnlro 2_Y�C- L jc J�� 1� �.� (? of u yl `-w j �: i�) %ar, Per Mound City Code, Section 128-2, budding height and building line are defined as follows: rim - :: • •e '• � ra:. • ;r.- •• • G«Y. ::•re -c . :- ;� a :v + -r' •. - rr� r..' •s: r. v.. • • • «a •a "• - rte re. §Wl rW_Une. A line parallel to the street right-of -way or the ordinary high water level at any story level of a building and representing the minimum distance which all or-any part of the building is set back from said right-of- -way tine or ordinary high water level. Describe, the type of Mof style proposed: Pitched (Le. pitched, AaL :, roof, • s .ac ai ,Y' sYa • Y'•:. • Y•� • s: wvi f • 1fi..:.♦ r.: kIa f: 1 G• 3. Provide the swags grade elevation of the building line facing the rear of the lot or lake: 977.2 based on proposed grades referenced on submitted survey. 4. Provide the average grade elevation of die building lk*sj: 97_z.2 *f buildingi height referenced above., __ 21.32 -2517- 2518- U } 1 HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS __ citrnFneourto...__ (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) I PROPERTY ADDESS: 2217 Chateau Lane, Mound I NAME: Steve Bedell LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .............. ....... ...... -- ........ LOT AREA 4788 SO, FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. 1915 ' Existing Lois of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X — 1090 X — TOTALHOUSE.. .................. ............................... 1090 DETACHED BUILDINGS X = (GARAGE/SHED) TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS DRIVEWAY, PARKING X = 510 AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. X = 97 X TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ......... ............................... 607 DECKS open decks (114" min. X Opening between boards) with a Pervious surface under are not X counted as hardcover. X — TOTALDECK ........-- ........... ............................... X - X - TOTAL OTHER .............. ............................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .................... ............................... 1697 UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ................................. ....... .................... ....... 218 PREPARED BY James H. Parker DATE 1002014 Revised 1/10 -2-Ul -- i' T J` qO 0 War szu o 6 L 1 v=i e m S 0 d L Y ^C^^^^ 6 E DfiaW E i2 g+ze` 2, i-i ��om gewo $� --1gggp 92.y 6 C9 aVdQ$ ;Bq� IL YtCY� try ¢uPit2� c z 0 Ei! tN' 0 z �u ,i� 2, i-i , 0 z �u ,i� aun7 �-- N eP4uaru la cbl O \ 3U aa� K i ba$ ni h I a�vQg e5 tV { Q YM let V hi O 0 i w �t�rs r h V R II h Z y h W � 3 99. FQio N Ego m �S egg, o � °y aJj o Ev 30o@ Ua a� A5 a z a� C� A a °'° °sue °god sve m sw 45 8 43 "mom F q. 'vC 4 iptiy h y'rl °Eoo�m d$e3rF p'9 ov`z 8 m q tlno P®o 7 i5� C7m� p�oa`4epv�vi vi✓ >,�°a �+'o^ CQ W Fi v'� SBRQ i¢ `� � �n GGi as L� n- ��W..•s. cimv o�uvi ay.9 o. rn= ° U v'S .n A -2� 1- ADVANCE ,S`UI VEYIN ENGINEERING CO- 5300 S. Hwy, No. 101 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone (952) 474 7964 www.advsur.com SURVEY FOR: STEVE BEDELL SURVEYED: September 24, 2014 DRAFTED: September 25, 2014 REVISED: September 30, 2014 to show proposed dwelling, related improvements, grading, drainage and erosion control details. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 18, Block 1, L. P. Creviers Subdivision of Part of Lot 36, Lafayette Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the above legal description. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct, and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish shown on the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the location of existing improvements we deemed important. 3. Setting new monuments or verifying old monuments to mark the corners of the property. 4. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the map when determining other elevations for use on this site. 5. While we show proposed improvements to your property, we not as familiar with your plans as you are nor are we as familiar with the requirements of governmental agencies as their. employees are. We suggest that you review the survey to confirm that the proposals are what you intend and submit the survey to such governmental agencies as may have jurisdiction over your project to gain their approvals if you can. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " Denotes 1/2" ID pipe with plastic plug bearing State otherwise noted. License Number 9235, set, unless CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, report or survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed Professional Engineer and Professional Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 944.6 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION k DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ---960.0 -- -942-' - -- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE —9+6 DENOTES PROPOSED STORM FLOW DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE -- sr sr Exs. Building firesho /d of door 97 Signature: �a rrw& Pan. u/1, Typed Name: James H. Parker Date: September 30, 2014 Reg. No. 9235 GRAPHIC SCALE zo 0 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft X973,2 - -_ 24.4 - -_� 140741 2014 09 30 A JP PROPOSED oc -2522- p 24-3 _974.\ 975.7 74.4 _ 974 %) X974.7 `ts ".� to VIM ti N -'976 i ��e. Qi �3 5 h X24. Q UOh i �v VI c o k = OR J o U 2 976. b 976.4 \ x.228 all �UI 140741 2014 09 30 A JP PROPOSED oc -2522- t EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: BACKGROUND h x� City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consultant Planner November 20, 2014 14 -26 Expansion Permit 3036 Highland Boulevard (PID NO. 23- 117 -24 -44 -0003) Low Density Residential R -1 Single Family Residential The City Council will consider an application for an expansion permit to allow the replacement of an existing, detached garage with a larger structure. The 20,045 square foot, lakeshore property is long and narrow with only 37.5 feet of street frontage. The applicant has indicated that the detached garage needs to be replaced as the north foundation wall is falling toward the neighbor and the west wall of the garage is not structurally sound. The existing, two -car garage is located only 1.7 feet from the north property line. It should be noted that at some time in the past a triangular piece of this property was transferred to the property to the north. This action may have decreased the amount of the setback for the existing garage. Details regarding the application are contained in the Planning Report which has been included as an attachment. Please be advised that the Planning Report had an error stating that the zoning of the property was R -1A when it is R -1. As the application is concerning an accessory building, the same provisions of Section 129 -194 apply no matter the zoning distrct. For Lakeshore lots, the detached garage is to be located no closer than 4 feet from the side yard and 20 feet from the front. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their November 18,'2014 meeting. The Planning Commission discussed with the property owner the need for the detached garage to remain in the same location rather than shifting it to the south or the east. The property owner noted the following: -2523- The property slopes significantly towards the lake, particularly to the east of the house. Sufficient space needs to be maintained to the south of the garage to allow construction vehicles to access the house and lakeside portions of the property. • The property to the south has a basement garage that is located on the property line. The applicant would like a few feet of space along the south property line to maintain some vegetation to soften the appearance of the retaining wall. • The proposed detached garage has an overhang to provide a safe shelter from the elements as the garage is accessed. This overhang reduces the space between the garage and the south property line. Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff. Please note that Planning Commissioner Kelvin Retterath recused himself from consideration of this request as he is the applicant on behalf of the property owner. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff has prepared the attached resolution for your consideration. -2524- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 18, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Doug Gawtry. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Brian Oberman, 2174 Overland La; Pete Wiechert, 1377 Gull La; Jason Baker, 1784 Jones La; Josh Dunwoody, 6116 Bartlett Blvd; Tom Betz, 300 Crestview, Long Lake; Mark Lee, 2020 Bellaire La.; Barry Robbins, 3036 Highland Blvd. Council members: Mayor Hanus, Heidi Gesch and Ray Salazar. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -26 Expansion Permit 3036 Highland Boulevard Applicant: Kelvin Retterath Commissioner Retterath recused himself for the 3036 Highland Boulevard case because he is the applicant. Trapp introduced the expansion permit request and reminded the Commission of the petition that was added to the packet at the beginning of the meeting. The applicant is requesting an expansion permit to allow the replacement of a detached garage with a larger structure. In review of the discussion items, it was suggested that additional discussion should occur as to why the garage cannot be relocated to the south. Smieja asked how much overhang is typically allowed. Trapp said that overhangs can extend 2 feet into the setback area. Kelvin Retterath (applicant), 2618 Grove Lane, indicated that the lot is fairly extreme in that it has a 36 foot width at the street. The neighbor to the south has a garage right on the property line. The present location allows for truck access to the lake side of the house for maintenance of trees. Smieja asked why the garage couldn't be moved to the east or south. Retterath indicated that it was desired to keep the dawn as well as the maple tree. Barry Robbins (owner), 3036 Highland Boulevard, has a family, snowmobiles, boats that he would like to hide from view. The garage is falling down and has to go. MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the expansion permit with Staff recommendations and findings of fact. MOTION carried unanimously. -2525- RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION APPROVING EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 3036 HIGHLAND BOULEVARD PLANNING CASE NO. 14 -24 PID NO. 23- 117 -24 -44 -0003 WHEREAS, the applicant, Kelvin Retterath, submitted a request for an expansion permit on behalf of the property owners, Barry and Jacqueline Robbins, to allow for the replacement of an existing detached garage with a larger structure at 3036 Highland Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the lakeshore property is located in the R -1 single - family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the parcel is long and narrow with only 37.5 feet of street frontage; and WHEREAS; the existing detached garage is a nonconforming structure as it is located only 1.7 feet from the north property line; and WHEREAS, the existing detached garage needs to be replaced as the north foundation wall is falling toward the neighbor and the west wall of the garage is not structurally sound; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to replace the existing garage in the same location with a new garage 24 feet wide by 44 feet deep; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting an expansion permit which is provided below: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. ; and (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed -2526- WHEREAS, details regarding the requested expansion permit for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the November 18, 2014 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the expansion permit request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 18, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the expansion permit as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the expansion permit request at its November 25, 2014 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are met. 2. The proposed detached garage is a reasonable use in the R -1 Single Family Residential Zoning District and will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 3. The development of interior storage for vehicles, trailers, and other personal items is seen as favorable. 4. While large, the garage is under the maximum allowed square footage for an individual accessory building. 5. The shape of the lot and the placement of the existing garage were established prior to the existing zoning regulations and are not the result of current property owner actions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the expansion permit with the following conditions: 1. Gutters shall be installed on the north and south sides of the garage. 2. A right -of -way agreement shall be secured to allow the contractor to enter the property to the north. 3. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning District. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -2527- 5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. 6. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 10. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 11. Any future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance (as applicable) and /or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of November, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Hanus, Mayor -2528- i have reviewed the preliminary drawings for the garage rebuild project for 3036 Highland Blvd, Mound and encourage the city to grant approval. NAME ADDRESS 3�( -2529- yQ�Tj a� tTp7 j ( - R rAk) • I DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director November 13, 2014 14 -26 Expansion Permit Kelvin Retterath 3036 Highland Blvd (PID No. 23- 117 -24 -44 -0003) Low Density Residential R -1A Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant has requested on behalf of the property owners, Barry and Jacqueline Robbins, an expansion permit to allow the replacement of a detached garage with a larger structure at 3036 Highland Boulevard. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be granted to provide relief to the landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulties. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the City Council shall evaluate the following criteria: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off -site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off - street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. -2530- 3036 Highland Blvd Expansion Permit PC Report (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. 60 -DAY PROCESS The expansion permit application was submitted on October 17, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be October 20, 2014. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around November 14, 2014 to inform them of the expansion permit request. SITE INFORMATION The lakeshore property is located on Highland Boulevard, south of Idlewood Road. The 20,045 square foot property has an existing home that was constructed in 1933 and a detached garage that the applicant estimates was built in the 1950s/1960s. The parcel is long and narrow with only 37.5 feet of street frontage. The existing, two -car detached garage is located only 1.7 feet from the north side property line. It should be noted that, at some point, a triangular piece of this property was transferred to the property to the north. This action decreased the amount of the setback for the garage along the north property line. -2531 - November 13, 2014 Page 2 3036 Highland Blvd Expansion Permit PC Report The applicant indicates that the detached garage needs to be replaced as the north foundation wall is falling toward the neighbor and the west wall of the garage is not structurally sound. The property owners would like to rebuild a larger structure that can accommodate vehicles, trailers, and /or storage. Given the width of the property, the proposed garage is 24 feet wide and 44 feet deep. It also will have storage in the upper floor. It is proposed to be located with the same setback as the existing garage so that there is space for a paved access to the house and Lakeshore. The proposed dimensions for the garage are: PROPOSED GARAGE DIMENSIONS CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Dan Faulkner, Required Proposed Difference Lot Area 6,000 sq. ft. 20,172 sq. ft. - Lot Width 60 feet 37.66 feet - Front Yard 20 feet 20.4 feet - Lakeshore /Rear 50 feet 50+ feet - Side Yard (north) 4 feet 1.7 feet 23 feet Side Yard (south) 6 feet 6 feet Hardcover (maximum 40 %) 8,028 sq. ft. 4,847 sq. ft. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Dan Faulkner, It appears there are gutters on the existing garage and I would City Engineer recommend they be installed on the north and south sides again. The contractor will need to enter onto the north property owner's land so a right -of -way agreement should be provided. Greg Pederson /Tony No Fire Code or Life Safety concerns with this project. Myers, Fire Department -2532 - November 13, 2014 Page 3 3036 Highland Blvd Expansion Permit PC Report DISCUSSION • An expansion permit is needed as the existing detached garage is located too close to the north property line. The applicant is proposing to replace the garage with a larger structure that will follow the same setback as the existing structure. The existing structure is located only 1.7 feet from the north property line. According to the applicant, the triangular portion of the property shown on the survey was transferred to the north property at some point in the past. This transfer has decreased the setback between the existing garage and the property line. Placing the garage closer to the north property line is desired to provide a place for trailer storage, room for snow storage, and space for a paved access area to the house. • The applicant narrative provides background on some of the design decisions. The proposed garage is slightly narrower in width than the garage to the north so that it fits in character. The upper facade is also stepped back to maintain architectural character and to minimize the bulk from the street. • The applicant has indicated that hardcover for the site will be under the 40% maximum allowed as an existing lot of record. This will be verified through the building permit process. • Building heights will need to be verified as part of the building permit process as Section 129 -194 (b) states that no accessory buildings shall be higher than the principal building. • Due to the proximity of the new structure to the property line, applicant is advised that there is building and /or fire code regulations that will apply to the project including, but not limited to, fire rating of walls, openings, projections, etc. • Additional discussion with the applicant as to why the garage cannot be moved to the south would be beneficial in consideration of this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -40 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of an expansion permit as requested subject to the following conditions: 1. Gutters shall be installed on the north and south sides of the garage. 2. Permission and /or access agreement must be obtained to allow the contractor to enter the property to the north. 3. Hardcover for the site shall not exceed 40% as allowed by the R -1 Zoning District, 4. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -2533 - November 13, 2014 Page 4 3036 Highland Blvd Expansion Permit PC Report 5. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit application is approved. 6. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 7. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 8. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 9. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 10. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 11. Any future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance (as applicable) and /or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -40 (a) are met. The proposed detached garage is a reasonable use in the R -1A Single Family Residential Zoning District and will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 3. The development of interior storage for vehicles, trailers, and other personal items is seen as favorable. 4. While large, the garage is under the maximum allowed square footage for an individual accessory building. 5. The shape of the lot and the placement of the existing garage were established prior to the existing zoning regulations and are not the result of current property owner actions. -2534- November 13, 2014 Page 5 3036 Highland Blvd Expansion Permit PC Report CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, It is anticipated that the expansion permit request will be reviewed at an upcoming City Council meeting. At this time, the tentative dates is Tuesday, November 25, 201 with an alternate date of Tuesday, December 9, 2014. -2535- November 13, 2014 Page 6 4c��-)r'c mg,;qg- 01/-7I)L'� EXPANSION PERMIT C;,OFM01) APPLICATION 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 -472 -0600 FAX 952.472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of applicati8d.' Case No. Please;; a or rintlegibly SUBJECT Address 3 `L Z # : $I [�A NI L V P PROPERTY Lot LEGAL �} Block DESC. (N� �I�NLI�)iDS Subdivision PID# zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 81 B2 83 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name + JAWOU,,LiNG C0991NS Email 1 Artr Y' ° I'.1 SL.GE,UOr1 OWNER Address `sri Phone Home Sa r Work 12 - Bas - X12 i 2 Fax APPLICANT Name 1 l ! Email rG V .GOf (IF OTHER THAN Address- 61 i- V ,a';,1 "i 1, No 111`I , 1-i KI OWNER) phone Home >hrsc Work 47'`3197 Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (] ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. N0 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): R�ht� r�I 2 ,a eX('PtJ510N Zf tSU(! p au � 2 1� Fad = I 7,'h'x/+1 i•-!K 5- foP +61� �1'w I K, Expansion Permit information (1130/2013) Page 4 of -2536- Case No. JAI Z � S. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E( q) ;70 Side Yard: (gS E W) ft. I 'f fkf.ft. 4, 3 —ft. Side Yard: { N(�)E W) ft. ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) Lakeside: (N Sgw) (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: 3 7, �,6 ft, ft. ft. t Lot Size: '2- C) sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: DO) t sq ft _16'5-7 sq ft sq ft A-L, DW M 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (�Q, No ( ). if no, specify each non - conformity: 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: (,) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: *S 7, ('g FT ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) drainage ()0 existing situation ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Wf W I P-r4 , 1 X 15 J' ! N L, e;: A, 2A 6', s- 15 Expansion Permit Information (1/3012013) Page 5 of 6 -2537- Case No. 0 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No if yes, explain: ND' 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No K). if yes, explain: HD 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (y), No { ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? Yz 5 9. Comments: f�X'I5-fIN(;;, N0f4-rr -' rOONP /+'f ~ iOri WALL IS rA; -hN6 JC)Wl (C) l�xlC 0� ^1"Q NDF -1 l%XISTIN ICI Si WALL, OV 6'A1Z'A6r -' I� fb K1OR_ -FP MlN iv, NOIT ra(.C�AR. WA j (foNS -r,, UC410N 61AN�AFP$ OLJwU 12. wr-.y' 15 -p) CIS °j'A'IN fiI ,Rt, w ACtGsas AN0 yll✓W 1`C Raysp, SOUTR NI;i6g5, o2'S C h(tAC� Is [1,'uILT Ota. I'OT Wig I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. owner's Applicants Expansion Permit Information (1/30/2013) Page 6 of 6 -2538- Date Date 10-16-1+ Sarah Smith From: kelvin (krkjrgroup @live.comj Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 4:32 PM To: Sarah Smith Cc: barry robbins Subject: RE: Expansion Permit Application - 3036 Highland Boulevard 11 -10 -14 Hi Sarah, Expansion Permit review criteria, Response as requested: Robbins Residence. For 3036 Highland Blvd, Item (1)a Functionally speaking, the proposed garage extension accommodates the four vehicles and /or boat trailer and snowmobile trailer owned by the Robbins. The structure also accommodates additional much needed storage, presently occupying the rear of the existing garage. The existing low attic space is also loaded with inaccessible stored items and overloading the existing structure. Aesthetically speaking, the garage architecture is classic Lake Minnetonka 'cottage style' found in the 1920 - 30's. The house is of that era and is a fine example of the architectural period. The garage seeks to emulate the proportions, scale and details of the era. (1)b This proposed expansion permit has no adverse off -site issues and will protect and hind from view the autos otherwise parked in the drive way. (1)c Given the placement of the three adjacent driveways, the number of vehicles parked and snow storage problems in winter, the off street parking is inadequate in this case. (2) The very narrow width of the lot at the street (37.66 ft) does not accommodate a three stall garage (12 ft per stall typically). The adjacent property to the south has a garage structure and retaining wall right to the property line. There was a pie shaped transfer of land to the adjacent property at some unknown date also prior to ownership of the Robbins, thus reducing the side yard to its present distance. (See full survey). Maintaining the present Northwest corner of the garage plus a standard garage width (24ft) allows for a paved 10' -8" access for the passage of service vehicles to the main house, allows for possible trailer storage on a flat surface, as well as snow storage to the south of the garage where vehicles are now parked. (See site plan 6/G1.0) (3) The existing placement of the garage location likely dates to the 1950 or 60's. The wedge shaped land transfer was done by an earlier owner. The shift of foundation likely occurred when the grade was lowered for the north neighbor. The existing garage is structurally unstable and unable to be IRC Building Code compliant given the tiny wall area surrounding the overhead garage doors. (4) The expansion creates a structure having a smaller width than the neighboring garage 24ft vs 26ft (see photo). The upper fapde is set back from the main overhead garage doors. The proposed architecture retains the authentic character of the Lake Minnet ^ ^L° "1storical style of the house. -2539- The driveway size is nearly identical to the existing condition except at a lower 8% slope due to lowering the garage floor 1ft. The present drive slope is 11 %. Industry standards recommend 10% as the maximum ideal slope autos. A brief note of support with numerous neighbor's signatures supporting the proposed work was submitted. (5) Size of the garage just accommodates the four vehicles. Mound allows a 2450 (1200sS.F. maximum) structure for accessory buildings. This structure is 6Ft shorter than the allowable. The interior wall heights are 8' -6" or the minimum required for standard overhead door hardware and opener. The existing house has a 16/12 roof pitch. The average roof height measured to the average grade is 21' -7" giving us the allowed for roof height. To minimize building height, the proposed garage structure has a 12/12 roof pitch with an average roof height of 14' -10 ". As a result the ridge is 4ft lower at the ridge than a 16/12 roof (16-10 "). Building code allows for a zero distance to lot line, (with no overhang) if the sidewall has a lhr rated assembly ( as proposed.) If any other explanations are necessary please call or Email. Thank you. Kelvin Retterath KJR Group, LLC -2540- HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS cry r -naaua (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTYADDES& 3036 4ir. L4,40 ELVD- �__j OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA SQ. FT, X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... LOT AREA Zvi t S SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) .............................. ¢� I ' Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT DECKS Open decks (114" min, Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ......... ............................... X - X - a 2zzz- TOTALDECK ....... ................. ................ X �CGP✓sEc? cNt.G tF1 tiE�c�GRPe66 X n Ew <a✓c. NGu/ GUt t/< X vEU d A1rvE TOTAL EFTtiEf2 .CIV,41,16.E-...�........... HOUSE E�eaeEUk+ aGf = -580 RFSZavc o.rrvr _ —120z fss�� - --- 14 Y5 f Z f .yc�� <�..9./jYS TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE............`! . P.8....tL,57y9 ............. X 4`g ?1 UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ......... _ .......................... ............................... TOTAL HOUSE .. ............ ....... ..... ....... .... ..... ...... — DETACHED BUILDINGS X Sao (GARAGE /SHED) X - Soo TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS _ ............................ DRIVEWAY, PARKING X AREAS, SIDEWALKS, X = &C? ETC. S3 _vP 1� 167-L.O&v 6 2zp� WO€�7 ra3 DECKS Open decks (114" min, Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not counted as hardcover. TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ......... ............................... X - X - a 2zzz- TOTALDECK ....... ................. ................ ..... .:........ �CGP✓sEc? cNt.G tF1 tiE�c�GRPe66 X n Ew <a✓c. NGu/ GUt t/< X vEU d A1rvE TOTAL EFTtiEf2 .CIV,41,16.E-...�........... - f 105'6 E�eaeEUk+ aGf = -580 RFSZavc o.rrvr _ —120z fss�� - --- 14 Y5 f Z f .yc�� <�..9./jYS TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE............`! . P.8....tL,57y9 ............. 4`g ?1 UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ......... _ .......................... ............................... PREPARED BY �Qnl j f'1 r 1 �d %ad 4, - -- DATE ,_,_ ✓o- /.i*- -1 V -- Revised v10 -2541- z x z p9- z z E, o "y 0 0 ;�M xul / �4 0' / X 9 cow zz gfa I W C4 Q z C) z z E- Z z ak 06- S Ly n t !H; Fo- (7At 011 9 Z-3 B, GJYL • WED I �J r d' LO O 0) 00 m ZO V) w W0 J / i I i 1 i i i ii i � I n MI '�\ v s / d < :: ay O N¢ ^1 03: Q o -2543- 1N3W3Sb8 i-- O J 0 z 0 ti U O J Q J m O Z W U) c_ L W d O V, C O O v- O Y CL U3 U X O N Q .0 C1t 0 t H D- CV a Y U U _O W m 0 Lli Q� o J J O N- Os_ C CC 00 C +� o� o' O O C N.. L Y Y 0 off. m 0 t Y C Y J Q O' � N .O (no v O. O C Lam. O T i O L U � O LZ N Y W L aL-+ O L � N � o Y L C c C Y o00 C)LC) Ic N N E� E� 0 U N / i i / O ly V O s R z W g� N :: ay O N¢ ^1 03: Q o -2543- 1N3W3Sb8 i-- O J 0 z 0 ti U O J Q J m O Z W U) c_ L W d O V, C O O v- O Y CL U3 U X O N Q .0 C1t 0 t H D- CV a Y U U _O W m 0 Lli Q� o J J O N- Os_ C CC 00 C +� o� o' O O C N.. L Y Y 0 off. m 0 t Y C Y J Q O' � N .O (no v O. O C Lam. O T i O L U � O LZ N Y W L aL-+ O L � N � o Y L C c C Y o00 C)LC) Ic N N E� E� 0 U N / i i / ly V s R W 2 W d... LAJ Q Q O � <> Qo: c> �. U�. gar Z Lj N0 I-- V) x o: N_ � W S :: ay O N¢ ^1 03: Q o -2543- 1N3W3Sb8 i-- O J 0 z 0 ti U O J Q J m O Z W U) c_ L W d O V, C O O v- O Y CL U3 U X O N Q .0 C1t 0 t H D- CV a Y U U _O W m 0 Lli Q� o J J O N- Os_ C CC 00 C +� o� o' O O C N.. L Y Y 0 off. m 0 t Y C Y J Q O' � N .O (no v O. O C Lam. O T i O L U � O LZ N Y W L aL-+ O L � N � o Y L C c C Y o00 C)LC) Ic N N E� E� 0 U N rw ranRC NEWt,47 i7R - -2544- ro ilY KRD 01EAI@WW.- iGi "OGPELD NALLPtfiM id-.YOG ALL KWD Od.1" Ei f0 O " N4Ve Y$ Ld1.D 1'e C OF aw-sNZWK NrtN�NitlLffi WMI wAnmmw' w�acNama �B6iN'ffiD/TiG WYAB.TP OF r 0@C�18dfd6 V M0 <riIOL IIYlI W'f p °PWFCtN N9NODriILi®BDt. aLp1N SECTION c� v.^ . r� -2545- r • ♦ 4— 1wslee tvruw�whNtvanlns "DCi9FD LW- L'XA1r 6WNl®EPLMCUPNMIIrPx� ALL AA'NiR1IDffi111 rt'�VgNN1ORRTVIttP. W 1 VRPfI' V rSM.NNf,Itl YDR NNMINN:Mr �M2�f�Ay .��GrdpbE /O�aiB�Ay}W�GLCOTMBM. EX �ORIOR 1W'LJ NIIGNS EYitRfMNNON6oavxrr D- Wl IXAOR. � ♦. /6tfllr OVLR -ID81F,Y110t f- NOSGkOR -NIIE .�mruawuccmexeuareuwteW Nae.rom�ar. AD N Nid W,Rt iWMDtlr . A{L L14YR.iKd'DNNSNN:V 10.AR V N21L w,� r-TVw NrowL - A0lT1tl I!(Ci"P4dlYNNIOW Mbf fleN CGgR - A6 W PA4@t 6VYaW At �f NNL RW di N W E W gl"dLi1 G11C11 N%i dNN f0/ Mi4 X �I u �I a I IB t f F t I I I � r I X I 7tW1 I `I 1 c4) 0 _Z X% .o s U N l� I 1 � 1 � I e � 1 I t/ z r i 1 IV m E f � 1 w NII I I I � IB t f F t I I I � r I X I 7tW1 I `I 1 c4) 0 _Z X% .o s U N l� I 1 � 1 � I e � 1 I t/ z r i 1 IV m E CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR 2015 STREET, UTILITY AND RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — TUXEDO BOULEVARD WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 14th day of October, 2014, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed 2015 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project for improvement of Tuxedo Boulevard from Sulgrove Road to Brighton Boulevard; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 25th day of November, 2014, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, 1. The 2015 Street, Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project — Tuxedo Boulevard is found to be necessary, cost- effective, and feasible as detailed in the Feasibility Report. 2. Such improvements are hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution No. 14 -82 adopted on the 14th day of October, 2014. 3. Bolton & Menk, Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the cost of the improvement from the proceeds of the tax - exempt bond. Adopted by the City Council this 25th day of November, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Hanus -2548 - 1 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 PLANNING REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant DATE: November 20, 2014 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Proposed Ordinance Amending Chapters 14 and 129 of the Mound City Code as it relates to the Keeping of Animals Earlier this year it was determined that the City should modify its animal regulations to clearly state that the keeping of animals such as chickens, alpacas, llamas, and bees are not allowed. City Staff has undertaken a review of City regulations and suggests changes to both Chapter 14 and Chapter 129. As amendments to Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) are being proposed, Sec. 129- 34(b)(3) requires that the City Council hold a public hearing which has been scheduled to be held at the Tuesday, November 25, 2014 meeting. As part of its work plan, City Staff had also been requested to identify language to address the keeping of exotic animals. Since the changes would also be within Chapter 14, Staff has included those in the proposed ordinance amendment. In reviewing Chapter 14, it was also determined that the City Code regulations regarding dangerous dogs could be clarified. The City Attorney recommended that Chapter 14 be modified in Subsection 14.5 to specifically identify that Minnesota Statutes Sections 347.50 to 347.565 apply to the keeping of dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs. The City should also be aware that while it is not specifically stated in Minnesota Statues, the courts have held that cities must give due process in the evaluation of a potentially dangerous dog, including allowing for an appeal of an initial determination. The proposed changes to Chapter 14 and 129 have been reviewed and recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission at their September 2nd and November 18th meetings. At the September 2nd meeting the Planning Commission reviewed proposed draft language and at the November 18th meeting the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance. While the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the proposed ordinance at its November 18th meeting, it did ask Staff to review and revise as necessary the proposed revisions to Section 14.4. Animals at large, keeping in mind the following questions: -2549- 1) Should an animal be allowed to be off -leash or on a leash longer than 6 feet on its owner's property? Staff revised the language to indicate that the Animals at large provisions apply to an animal that is off of the owner's property or is on another person's property without their consent. Staff believes this means that animals on their owner's property or on another person's property with their consent do not need to be specifically restrained by a fence, leash, or by being at heel. 2) Do we need to specifically allow an animal to be considered restrained if there fencing or an electronic fence? As with question 1, Staff feels that the intent is to not have to address how an animal needs to be restrained on its owner's property. Thus, fencing has not been included in these provisions. 3) Can someone have an animal at heel while inside of a vehicle as it is currently implied from the code? Staff revised the language to separate being at heel from being under control of a competent person while in a vehicle. 4) Do we need to provide for animals in parades or other type events? Staff feels that during a parade or event, the City would still like an animal to be under control by a leash or heeling. Thus, changes to the ordinance were not proposed. The proposed ordinance provided for your consideration includes the modifications identified above. A draft resolution has also been prepared which would allow the publication of the ordinance by summary. The resolution needs to be passed by a 4/5 vote of all members of the City Council, not just those present. Chapters 14 and 129 Changes for Keeping of Animals -2550- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 18, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid, Absent: Doug Gawtry. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Brian Oberman, 2174 Overland La; Pete Wiechert, 1377 Gull La; Jason Baker, 1784 Jones La; Josh Dunwoody, 6116 Bartlett Blvd; Tom Betz, 300 Crestview, Long Lake; Mark Lee, 2020 Bellaire La.; Barry Robbins, 3036 Highland Blvd. Council members: Mayor Hanus, Heidi Gesch and Ray Salazar. BOARD OF APPEALS Amendments to City Code Chapters 129 and 14 Related to Animals Trapp introduced the proposed modifications to the animal codes. The City Attorney recommended that the code regarding dangerous and potentially dangerous dogs be modified in addition to the previous changes. The intent is that the Planning Commission review all the changes at this time and move it on to the City Council for public hearing. Smieja questioned the 6 foot leash regulation under Section 2 item 2) as it doesn't specify whose property to which this pertains. Also, underground fencing as a restraining method isn't addressed. Retterath asked about whether in parades or other city events if an animal could be allowed to be off of a leash in Section 2. Trapp stated that Section 2 seems to have some problems that Staff will fix before sending it on to the City Council. MOTION by Goode, second by Bergquist, to recommend the changes proposed by Staff be recommended to the City Council, including changes suggested at this meeting. MOTION carried. -2551- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Doug Gawtry. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. No public present BOARD OF APPEALS Discussion /action — Review of proposed amendments to City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning) and Chapter 14 (Animals) Trapp introduced the proposed changes regarding the keeping of certain animals. The first changes are Section 14 -2 and 14 -4 to alleviate confusion and encourage people to read for specifics. The focus of the keeping of animals will be in Chapter 14 -9 for details. Section A identifies "pet" and specifically outlaws what cannot be kept. Section 14 -3 deals with the most common exotics. Also included was the display and exhibition of animals not excluding the little farm exhibit. Subsection 129 -2 includes a use table for gardening and horticultural and deals with the keeping of bees. Stone asked if there could be a statement to direct questions to City Hall if they are unsure. Trapp said that's kind of a given. Stone thought that the "gardening and horticulture" and "keeping of bees" should be split apart to further clarify. Jamison asked about fees (14.9 (e)). Smith indicated that, if there are extraordinary costs involved in capture they would be passed on to the owner. Bergquist asked how hard it will be to allow an animal, like chickens, once it's in the code specifically like this. Trapp said it is the same procedure we are going through for these changes. Smieja thought it mike be better to generalize in 129 and be specific in 14. Trapp thought people would never look at both sections. -2552- Retterath asked if there is a reason why the two sections so far apart. Trapp said this is the regular numeric organization of the code. Smith commented that when looking at changing regulations to allow chickens, whichever way it went, we recommended amending the code and these examples were part of the original suggestion. Trapp agreed except we added the exotics and things got a little more complicated. MOTION by Goode, second by Bergquist, to move these amendments to the City Council and be favorably considered by the City Council. MOTION carried unanimously. -2553- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE -2014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 14 AND 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE KEEPING OF ANIMALS The City of Mound does ordain: Section 1. Subsection 14 -2. General prohibition, of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows: No person shall keep any animal in the city or permit such animal to be kept on premises owned, occupied, or controlled by him except under the conditions prescribed by this Code. Section 2. Subsection 14 -4. Animals at large, of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows: No person shall permit any animal of which he is the owner, caretaker, or custodian to be at large within the city. Any such animal is deemed to be at large when it is off the premises owned or rented by the owner or his agent and not under restraint. An animal is not under restraint when any of the following occurs: 1) The animal is not on a leash, 2) The animal is on a leash exceeding six feet in length 3) The animal is not at heel beside a competent person having custody of it 4) The animal is not under a competent person's custody when in a vehicle being driven or parked on the street; or 5) The animal is on the property of another without the consent of the property owner. Section 3. Subsection 14 -5. Confinement of fierce animals, of the Mound City Code is hereby amended as follows: Every owner shall confine within a building or secure enclosure any fierce-,-dangersus, or vicious animal except when muzzled and in the control of a competent person. Minnesota Statutes Sections 347.50 to 347.565 shall apply to the keeping of any dangerous or potentially dangerous dog. -2554- Section 5. Subsection 129 -2. Definitions, of the Mound City Code is hereby amended to add the following new language: Gardening and Horticulture Uses means the keeping of a garden for the cultivation propagation, and processing of plants, flowers, vegetables, herbs, and fruits for alpacas potbellied pigs pigs bees chickens ducks geese turkeys peacocks pigeons, swans, and doves is not a gardening or horticulture use. Passed by the City Council this 25th day of November, 2014 Mayor Mark Hanus Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Published in the Laker the of , 2014. Effective the day of 2014. -2555- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 14- AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound has adopted Ordinance No. _ -2014 amending Chapters 14 and 129 of the Mound City Code as it relates to the keeping of animals; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4, allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances; and WHEREAS, the following summary of Ordinance No. __- 2014 has been approved by the City Council of the City of Mound as clearly informing the public of the intent and effect of the Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound has reviewed the following summary of the ordinance and approved its publication in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.191, subdivision 4: Ordinance No. = 2014 has been approved by the City Council of the City of Mound. The Ordinance amends Chapter 14 of the Mound City Code clarifying what animals are allowed to be kept in the City; when an animal is deemed to be at large; and the application of Minnesota Statutes for the keeping of dangerous or potentially dangerous dogs. The Ordinance also amends Chapter 129 of the Mound City Code as it relates to the Zoning Ordinance providing a definition for Gardening and Horticulture Uses. A copy of the full text of the ordinance is available at City Hall and at the Mound Public Library. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk keep a copy of the entire text of the ordinance in her office at city hall for public inspection and that she post of the entire text of the ordinance at Westonka Public Library in the City. Passed by the City Council this 25`h day of November, 2014. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -2556- Mayor Mark Hanus NOTICE OF A CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 129 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers in the Centennial Building (former City Hall) located at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 25, 2014 to hold a public hearing to consider amendments to City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) relatec to definitions and the residential land use table. These amendments are related to the City's animal regulations contained in Chapter 14 which are also being amended. Copies of the ordinance amendment(s) are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Jill Norlander, Planning and Inspections Secretary Published in the Laker on November 15, 2014 -2557- nAk fi17Y QF MOUND........ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: F-TT-TiNCT1 r Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director November 20, 2014 14 -25 Variance — setbacks and hardcover Mark Lee 1975 Lakeside Lane (PID No. 18- 117 -23 -23 -0078) Low Density Residential R -1 Single Family Residential The applicant, Mark Lee, is requesting variance approval to allow six (6) foot side setbacks and 40 percent hardcover for future construction of a new, single- family home at 1975 Lakeside Lane. The property at 1975 Lakeside Lane (Lot 2) is located on the south side of Lakeside Lane and has frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The lot is currently vacant and was part of a minor subdivision approved in 2003 that involved Lots 1 and 2, Block 11, Shadywood Point. A house previously existed on the subject lot and was removed. in summary, the subdivision approved in 2003 involved a shifting of the interior lot line to the east between Lot 1 and Lot 2, as originally platted, to create two (2) lots. The subdivision also included variance approval for the adjacent lot to the east (Lot 1) to allow a 10 -foot setback from Beachwood Lane. A new house was constructed on Lot 1, located at 1989 Lakeside Lane, in 2003. When the property at 1989 Lakeside Lane was being sold, it was discovered that the resolution recorded for the minor subdivision separated the lots to their original platted lot lines rather than to what was approved. Variances are now being requested for Lot 2 to address the reduced lot dimensions resulting from the recording error. Details regarding the applications are contained in the Planning Report No 14 -25 dated November 13, 2014, along with the applicant's submitted materials, which have been included as attachments. Staffs recommendation was to approve side setbacks of six (6) and ten (10) feet and hardcover up to 40 percent as would customarily be allowed a lot of record. However, Staff did not recommend variance approval to allow the additional six (6) foot side setback. -2558- Planning Commission Meeting Overview. The proposed project and applications were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 18, 2014 meeting. The majority of the discussion at the meeting focused on the applicant's request to allow both side setbacks to be six (6) feet due to the "wedge" configuration of Lot 2 which narrows from the street to the lake and the practical difficulty due to the recording error. Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommended variance approval to allow lot of record provisions to the subject lot along with an additional side setback of six (6) feet because of the practical difficulty and current lot configuration. Because of differing recommendations from Staff and the Planning Commission, a resolution has not been prepared and will be brought back to an upcoming meeting for action based on the City Council's action. A copy of the DRAFT minute excerpts from the November 18, 2014 meeting have been included as an attachment. Additional Comment. The variance application was submitted on September 29, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be September 30, 2014. The City's deadline for action on the application is on or before November 28, 2014 unless an extension is executed. The applicant and City Council are advised that the City will be executing a 60 -day extension for action on the variance request. -2559- MINUTE EXCERPTS r •. • • NOVEMBER 18,2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jeffrey Bergquist, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Doug Gawtry. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Noriander. Members of the public: Brian Oberman, 2174 Overland La; Pete Wiechert, 1377 Gull La; Jason Baker, 1784 Jones La; Josh Dunwoody, 6116 Bartlett Blvd; Tom Betz, 300 Crestview, Long Lake; Mark Lee, 2020 Bellaire La.; Barry Robbins, 3036 Highland Blvd. Council members: Mayor Hanus, Heidi Gesch and Ray Salazar. Planning Case No. 14 -25 Variance 1975 lakeside Lane Applicant: Mark Lee Smith introduced the request for a variance to allow six foot side setbacks and 40 percent hardcover for construction of a new home. Because of a recording error when the original lot was subdivided in 2003, it was actually split on the original lot lines instead of attaching the intended triangular piece of property on to Lot 2. In 2005, the City changed its regulations allowing lots involved with waiver of platting to retain lot of record status. As the recording error essentially created a waiver of platting situation with the lots reverting to their originally platted dimensions, Staff is recommending variance approval for side setbacks of 6 feet and 10 feet and 40 percent hardcover. Mark Lee, 2020 Bellaire Lane, has struggled with this as they are selling the lot. He said they lost 10 feet on the lake due to the error. Smieja said it was clear to him that this was a condition not created by the owner. Smith noted that the building permit for the new house on Lot 1 was based on the configuration for the arrangement approved with the minor subdivision in 2003. Discussion ensued regarding the details and impact on constructability of a home on the lot due to its wedge shape. Commissioner Retterath stated he did not wish to offer comment on the matter as he is the applicant for the next case which has similar shape. -2560- MOTION by Smieja, second by Bergquist, to approve the variance to allow 2 side setbacks of 6 feet and hardcover 40 percent with staff recommendations and findings of fact 1 -3 listed in the planning report and an additional number 4 that Lot 2 is an original platted lot. MOTION carried unanimously. -2561- r nA CITY 4f P.2t?UNU__... PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director November 13, 2014 (revised 11 -20 -2014 to correct PID) 14 -25 Variance — setbacks and hardcover Mark Lee 1975 Lakeside Lane (PID No. 18- 117 -23 -23 -0078) Low Density Residential R -1 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Mark Lee, is requesting variance approval to allow six (6) foot side setbacks and 40 percent hardcover for future construction of a new, single - family home at 1975 Lakeside Lane. The property at 1975 Lakeside Lane (Lot 2) is located on the south side of Lakeside Lane and has frontage on Lake Minnetonka. The lot is currently vacant and was part of a minor subdivision approved in 2003 that involved Lots 1 and 2, Block 11, Shadywood Point. A house previously existed on the subject lot and was removed. In summary, the subdivision approved in 2003 involved a shifting of the interior lot line to the east between Lot 1 and Lot 2, as originally platted, to create two (2) lots. The subdivision also included variance approval for the adjacent lot to the east (Lot 1) to allow a 10 -foot setback from Beachwood Lane. A new house was constructed on Lot 1, located at 1989 Lakeside Lane, in 2003. When the property at 1989 Lakeside Lane was being sold, it was discovered that the resolution recorded for the minor subdivision separated the lots to their original platted lot lines. Therefore, variances are being requested for Lot 2 to address the reduced lot dimensions resulting from the recording error. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. -2562- (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on September 29, 2014. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be September 30, 2014. The City's deadline for action on the application in on or before November 28, 2014 unless an extension is executed. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a copy of the November 18, 2014 Planning Commission meeting agenda on November 14, 2014 to inform them of the variance request. -2563- STAFF / CONSULTANT / AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received as part of the routing and review process have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See comments provided below: Greg Pederson, Fire Chief There are no fire code issues or concerns with this project. Joey Handtmann, MCWD District Representative After preliminary review for the proposed single family home construction at 1975 Lakeside Ln, it would appear that an erosion control permit would almost definitely be required. Any excavation /fill over 50 cubic yards or more than 5000 square feet of soil disturbance would trigger this. Also, any construction below the 9315 100 -year flood contour would require a floodplain permit from us as well. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. INFORMATION / DISCUSSION 1. A copy of the survey dated November 26, 2002 submitted for the original minor subdivision has been included for the purpose of the variance application. Staff has also depicted the original configuration of Lot 2 on a copy of the 2002 lot split survey. 2. According to the information on the Hennepin County website, the property is owned by Scott & Jennifer Lee, Et Al. The taxpayers are Mark P & Rebecca Lee. Per information from the applicant, there was an error with the filing of the paperwork which is being corrected. A floodplain alteration permit was approved by the City in 2004 and involved the placement of 30 CY of fill on the lot to eliminate a low spot and included compensation. 4. The regulations for the R -1 zoning district are contained in Sec. 129 -100. The setback requirements that are required for a non -lot of record parcel are summarized below: Front: 30 feet Sides: 10 feet / 10 feet Rear: 50 feet from 929.4 Ordinary High Water Mark for Lake Minnetonka 5. Lots created as part of a new subdivision are limited to 30 percent maximum hardcover. -2564- 6. As previously mentioned the City's approval of the minor subdivision took place in 2003. This action changed the status of the subject lots to a non -lot of record because of the shifting of the interior lot line. In 2005, the City amended its regulations related to boundary adjustment, waiver of platting and subdivision exemptions approvals and allows parcels to retain lot of record status. As the resolution separated Lots 1 and 2 along original lot lines, it would be considered as a waiver of platting according to Sec. 121 -33 (2). Therefore, assigning lot of record status to Lot 2 seems reasonable. In addition to requesting lot of record setbacks and hardcover maximums, the applicant is requesting an additional variance to reduce the other side yard setback from 10 to 6 feet. Staff is not recommending this additional variance. Staff notes that while the lot is smaller than intended through the 2003 subdivision, it is over 10,000 square feet minimum lot size for the R -1 District according to the Hennepin County website and has reasonable amount of building pad area without the additional side setback variance. 8. Drainage and utility easements, in favor of the City of Mound, were required as part of the City's approval of the 2003 minor subdivision. At this time, it is unknown whether the easements may need to be amended and /or vacated. This will be reviewed as a separate activity. STAFF RECOMMENDATION — Lot of Record Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend variance approval for the property at 1975 Lakeside Lake to allow one (1) side setback to be six (6) feet and hardcover up to 40 percent, as allowed for a lot of record, subject following the conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance is approved. 3. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. -2565- The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, fioodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant will be required to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 8. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. The 100 -year floodplain elevation is 931.0 The RFPE for lake Minnetonka is 933.0. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The variance is requested due to circumstances unique to the property. 3. The request is reasonable and will not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 4. Lot 2 is an original platted lot. Application of the lot of record regulations to the subject lot would allow for one setback to be six (6) feet and maximum of 40 percent hardcover. 2566- STAFF RECOMMENDATION — Additional 6 Foot Side Setback Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend denial of the requested variance to allow an additional side setback of six (6) feet for the subject lot. Staff's recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The request for both side setbacks to be six (6) feet is not minimizing the variance. 2. The criteria contained in Sec. 129 -39(a) are not being met. 3. The applicable side setbacks and hardcover for a lot of record in the R -1 District that apply to the subject lot allow for one (1) side setback to be six (6) feet and the other side setback to be ten (10) feet. This provides a buildable pad of reasonable size to accommodate future construction of a new home. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation (s) is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the tentative meeting date is Tuesday, November 25, 2014 with an alternate meeting date of December 9, 2014. -2567- . 9 2014 VARIANCE s. , .. A 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952 - 472 -0600 FAX 952 - 472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date City Council Date Please type or print legibly Case No. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure Af� for this property? Yes ( ) No `V . if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. com 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): 11/P 1�hply f I 4 0 !ot de' -loxg i "L-t (;if O^C ©Cj t Variance lnformaltjtl t 011 (;tplO5` (10(21/2013) Page 4 of 6 11^nViSt t "I (5 J-✓i� SUBJECT Address PROPERTY ii LEGAL Lot Block t DESC. Subdivision PID # '1 � l � � - 9 5 -d- 3 F 0c yZonin . Rt R1A R2 R3 Bt B2 83 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name t� . ark ee. Mark Email OWNER Address j t; Q Phone Home /a)le, lei f,'e� 6 i3 °3��1 6�V�efk FZ APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure Af� for this property? Yes ( ) No `V . if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. com 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): 11/P 1�hply f I 4 0 !ot de' -loxg i "L-t (;if O^C ©Cj t Variance lnformaltjtl t 011 (;tplO5` (10(21/2013) Page 4 of 6 11^nViSt Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (W No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: (@S E W) 3D ft, g) ft. G ft. Side Yard: ( N S(E)W ) 10 ft. ft. "i ft. Side Yard: (N S E ®) 10 ft. ft. ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: ( N(�F W) � fL rLd ft. (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is 1use located? Yes `V�, No ( )_ if no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? W too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 5 of 6 -2569- Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes W, No ( ). If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes( ), No *. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes Px ), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? Q I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as m, Owner's Sig Date_ Applicant's Signature Date Variance Information (10/21/2013) Page 6 of 6 -2570- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 03 -13 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND (20) FOOT FRONT SETBACK VARIANCE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1975 LAKESIDE LANE P & Z CASE # 03 -02 AND # 03 -03 WHEREAS, the applicants, Brenshell Homes and Mark Lee, have requested a minor subdivision to subdivide the property located at 1975 Lakeside. Lane to create two (2) lots; and WHEREAS, the minor subdivision also requires a (20) foot front yard setback variance from Beachside Place which is an unimproved public right of way; and WHEREAS, the property is located within the R -1 Single Family Residential District and subject to City Code Chapter 350:620; and WHEREAS, minor subdivisions are regulated by City Code Chapter 330:20 Subd. 1 (A); and WHEREAS, the proposed new lots meet the lot area, width and setback requirements of the R -1 District with the exception of the front yard setback of (30) feet from Beachside Place, which is unimproved, therefore a variance has been requested; and WHEREAS, the existing parcel located at 1975 Lakeside Lane include two (2) platted lots that were legally combined by a previous owner; and WHEREAS, the proposed subdivision generally follows the original lot lines with the new lot line shifting slightly to the east; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at its January 6, 2003 meeting and unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the minor subdivision and variance as requested by the applicant and as recommended for approval by Staff; and WHEREAS, in making its recommendation for approval, the Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: A. A front yard variance of (20) feet was reasonable because Beachside Place is an unimproved right -of -way that functions as a fire lane and will not be developed; and B. A front setback of (10) from Beachside Place will not affect vehicular sight lines -2571- Resolution No. 03 -13 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: A. The City Council does hereby approve the Minor Subdivision and Variance request with the following conditions: B. Hardcover surface coverage on the proposed new lots shall not exceed thirty (30) percent. C. Payment of one (1) park dedication fee of $1100.00. D. All comments from the City Engineer and Public Works Director as follows: 1. Final grading and drainage plan to be approved by the City Engineer at time of building permit application. 2. Provide drainage and utility easements along all new lot lines, five feet wide on the side lot lines and ten feet in width along the street sides. 3. Payment of the following utility charges for the southerly parcel shall be paid when the building permit application is issued: (1) Sewer Area Trunk Charge $1500 (1) Watermain Area Trunk Charge $1500 (1) Water Service Connection Charge $ 240 (1) Sewer Service Connection Charge $ 240 4. This minor subdivision and variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: Lots 1 & 2, Block 11, Shadywood Point The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Osmek and seconded by Councilmember Brown. The following voted in the affirmative: Brown, Hanus, Meisel, Osmek and Meyer. The following voted in the negative: None. Adopted this 14th day of January, 2003. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2572- Mayor Pat Meisel This information sheet only summarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. Every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein. However, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 952 - 472 -0607. General Zoning Information Sheet R -1 Zoning District — Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS - Lot Area, Lot Width, and Setback Requirements Minimum Lot Area ..... ......... ........ .......... ......... .. ................ .... ........... 10,000 Square Feet MinimumLot Width ......................................................... ............................... 60 Feet Front Yard Setback. ........ ........... ____ ............ .......... ............... . 30 Feet SideYard Setback........................................................... .............................10 Feet RearYard Setback_ , ... ............ .......... ................ __ ........................ 15 Feet MinimumLot Depth ........................................................... .............................80 Feet Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback ............................. .............................50 Feet Minimum Floor Area Requirement ............................ ............................840 Square Feet "Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 60 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul -de -sac shall be 60 feet at the front building setback line. Applicable side or rear yard setbacks apply to lot lines abutting fire lanes, alleys or unimproved street right -of -ways. Building Height. The vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, to the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. No building hereafter erected shall exceed two and one half (2 -1/2) stories or thirty -five (35) feet in height. LOTS OF RECORD Special Provisions Cnrnpr Lots (City Code Section 129 -197 (e) Lot width Minimum side yard setback 40 - 50 feet 10 feet 50 - 80 feet 20 feet 81 feet or more 30 feet Q;Ap Verd P m iirempnte — Thp rent iirnr9 sine vard spthank shall ha a minimum of in fppf Lot width Minimum setback on 1 side and 40 — 79 fleet 6 feet 80 — 100 feet 8 feet 101 feet or more 10 feet Front Yard — Except as regulated in Section 129 -197 (f) of the City Code, the front yard setback shall be hosed on the lot depth as follows: Lot depth Minimum front yard setback 60 feet or less 20 feet 61 — 80 feet 24 feet 81 feet or more 30 feet I,-. - -2573- �l O 70i3gx 6 E� s 9,2 Fri .9Q` g2g, 9ti9� TO / 9-1 / I \ � 0 / 0()T a �° Q �Q¢ / Q / 24" OUTLET TOP = 931.0 / 0 30 60 90 SCALE IN FEET X9a 5 = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION. X(998.0) = PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 6. = DIRECTION SURFACE DRAINAGE BENCHMARK TOP SAN MH 934 SAN MH \ TR =934.2 INV= 923.8 Q�S� �� 8 DESCRIPTION: LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 11, SHADYWOOD POINT, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN. LOT AREA = 26250 SF/ 0.6 AC 1 111i111 ,1 Li m r;o 0 w N Q N p N O L Q_ O 'a a) LL 1 �W O j J ~3y0 W J V) Lli �j U=aJ U 0 o x z Z x_ q -i � m o d- 1 111i111 ,1 m r;o 0 w N N p N O o O =op J ~3y0 W Q 1 111i111 ,1 - 2574 m r;o 0 w N N p N O KNi ¢ O =op J ~3y0 W �j U=aJ U 0 w x_ - 2574 �9 2 yo'SF 0 9 i FO/r' o / 3A 0 / 936 ell SMH 0 30 60 90 sBl �o �s QQ wN \�y� SCALE IN FEET /� � p 93' -57 ati5 = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION. \so 9ya? ��6nn yti5 ti' ' s °� CATCH \ ? \� \0 ��2a^ yy / 0 +9 BASM- /� X(998.0) = PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 9 3 n RAINAGE S 'RBA) ,o!f 12640SF/ �'pRF<iNF \ ti~ s SOo S) 3p/o2 y F \ \ O 9s0 \929,> 60 26 d ... = DIRECTION SURFACE D i s3 � •s nl���r 6 1 s h BENCHMARK TOP SAN MH SAN MH V = 9 .2 IN INV= 923.8 w 1 7 70 e �� 0(:'o��o G 1. Q` 24" OUTLET TOP = 931.0 5 / 9h / / cT SF � DESCRIPTION: LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 11, ;SHADYWOOD POINT, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN. LOT AREA = 26250 SF/ 0.6 AC J W �0--,i� L 62W0 Q of o a 33N� Ql- W�2LL o= o J N LLJ �N'4 Z Fy ti m o o =o��- J z 0 Z N -ova Cy J aJ U O Z o 4- m - O w w °z_ J W �0--,i� a poop 62W0 33N� Ql- W�2LL J W �0--,i� a poop 62W0 33N� Iro W�2LL �N'4 Z F Wow "p2W 2 O =o��- J 0 N -ova tt aJ U O Z p W >0<x Z m - O w w °z_ a ¢ w iri � MINUTES OCTOBER 7, 2014 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Kelvin Retterath, Jameson Smieja, Bill Stone and Mark Wegscheid. Absent: Jeffrey Bergquist. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Justin Rock, Galway Road; Lauren Mattioli, Galway Road; Robert & Carol Lien, Bluebird Lane; Wendy Edberg, Galway Road; Sandy Kennedy, 5168 Tuxedo Boulevard; Gene Hostetler, 6168 Sinclair Court. APPROVAL MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to approve the agenda as amended. MOTION carried unanimously. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 2 2014 MOTION by Stone, second by Smieja, to approve the September 2, 2014 minutes. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Planning Case No. 14 -21 Public Lands /Variance /Appeals Request 4909 Island View Drive Applicant: Mike and Martha Mason Smith introduced the planning case. The applicants are proposing to undertake improvements on the property to include an outdoor pool patio area, stairs /landings, retaining walls, landscaping, grass /ground cover, plantings on -grade patio /sitting area, fencing and stair climber /lift. In general, the improvements are proposed to repair the existing retaining walls and staircase which are in poor condition and in need of replacement; also, to upgrade the lakeside area of the property. These improvements require a public lands permit for the work in Devon Commons and a variance for rear setback; top of bluff setback and fence enclosure requirement for the existing pool. Retterath asked if it was type C commons. Smith said it was. -2576- Smieja asked if there is a notification process when their property has to be compromised for repair of the infrastructure. Smith replied that, in an emergency situation, there may be no time to notify; however, in planned replacement or repair there would be an advance notice requirement. Mike Mason (4909 Island View Drive) commented to the commission that this project has been long anticipated. They did extensive cleanup when they first moved in years ago and that he currently works in environmental design. Wegscheid complimented him on the design. Retterath asked if the lift on east side was going in now. Mason replied that it was in response to the needs of aging friends and family. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Wegscheid, to approve the variances with staff recommendations and findings of fact listed in the planning report. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to approve the public lands permit with staff recommendations as listed in the planning report. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Smieja, to approve the Appeals Request staff recommendations and finding of fact listed in the planning report. MOTION carried unanimously. Planning Case No. 14 -18 Variance 5168 Tuxedo Boulevard Applicant: Paul and Sandy Kennedy Trapp introduced the application. The applicants are requesting a 15 foot front yard setback variance to allow the construction of a 2- story, 24 foot by 24 foot garage with a hallway addition that attaches the garage to the house. The property is located on the north side of Tuxedo Boulevard. The existing home was constructed in 1920 and is located on the top of a hill that slopes down to the lake and to the roadway. There is no garage on the property at present. The front property line is located approximately 17.5 feet from the back of the curb. The planned addition would be 22 feet from the back of curb allowing for vehicle storage in the driveway. Public Works indicated that the request was reasonable and allows for the addressing of drainage issues related to the site. Sandy Kennedy (5168 Tuxedo Boulevard) indicated that it was just a basic garage to protect the cars. -2577- Smieja asked her to elaborate on the plans for the hill. Kennedy said there was not a lot of room to move things around. Based on recommendation from Public Works personnel, this is the best. Retterath asked if there would be outdoor stairs up to the house or if the only access would be from inside the garage. Kennedy replied that there would be stairs inside the garage and the outdoor steps are being replaced by landscaping and stairs with landings to make it less steep. MOTION by Goode, second by Gawtry, to recommend approval of the variance with Staff recommendations and findings of fact including findings that the topography of the site and the stormwater management needs of the neighborhood limit the location of the garage on the site. MOTION carried unanimously. Planning Case No. 14 -20 Expansion Permit 1586 Bluebird Lane Applicant: Robert Lien Trapp introduced the application. The applicant has requested an expansion permit to allow for the remodeling /addition of the existing house within its current footprint. The project involves the expansion of the second floor over an existing first floor room on the front of the house as well as changing the orientation of the roof. A conforming mechanical room on the first floor is also contemplated. An expansion permit is required because of the 13 foot setback front setback and the anticipated addition of a mechanical room over the existing first floor space at the front of the house. Robert Lien (1583 Bluebird Lane) lives across the street. In 1977 they gave up 6 feet of land when they paved the street. At that point, it was conforming. MOTION by Smieja, second by Stone, to recommend approval including Staff recommendations 1 -10 and findings of fact 1 -3. MOTION carried unanimously. Planning Case No. 14 -23 Variance and Public Lands Permit 4730 Galway Road Applicant: Justin Rock The applicant is proposing to construct a new single - family dwelling on a vacant lot. The project involves construction of a driveway across the north half of unimproved Galway Road and other related improvements, including utility services. A public lands permit is required for construction of a driveway and utilities across the unimproved Galway Road for the new house. The variance is required for lack of frontage on an improved public road and front setback for the proposed home. Staff recommends approval of the variances and public lands permit subject to several recommendations and findings of fact. -2578- Retterath asked about the lowest floor. Smith responded that it is 933 in elevation. Retterath stated that, according to the elevations on the survey, the house could be stretched almost 30 feet closer to the lake. Information is lacking. Floor plan and proposed house pad don't match. Smith clarified the MCWD flood elevation and the City flood elevation requirements. She also stated that, if the inconsistency is a concern we can request more information; however, Staff carefully reviews plans and surveys to be sure it conforms to the granted approvals. Smieja asked for clarification of the "open but not vacated" Galway Road. Smith said that Galway Road is platted but not constructed. It's dedicated for public purposes. Generally, when roads are platted, ownership is extended to the center of the road. If a road in this vicinity is vacated, it is split to the middle and attached to the respective sides of the road. Vacations that extend to the water require 60 days of DNR review to insure public rights to the water are maintained and preserved. However, if they are not being used and no negative impact on the neighborhood the Council may agree to vacate. Retterath asked Smith if there had been a vacation in her history at the city. Smith indicated there had been a couple. Retterath asked if there was a benefit to vacating Galway Road. Smith thought there was a benefit to keeping it. It is simpler putting a driveway in private property but this is a reasonable approach. Stone asked if they build the road and there is only a 5 foot clearance, is there enough room for road maintenance and other activities. Smith thinks it will remain a private property endeavor and it can be accommodated. Smieja asked if there is commons on Excelsior Lane. Smith stated that it is not technically "commons" but counted for public dock footage. Justin Rock (vacant lot owner) asked if there were any questions. Retterath asked if we are we testing the water to see what reaction the commission would have. Rock said the intention is to present a minimum plan in order to save money before things go any further as his purchase of the property hinges on the approvals. Retterath thinks a house belongs here and the driveway is okay; however, we are premature and the city is committing itself when there's a lack of definition of what we are approving. Trapp stated that we don't have to approve tonight but need to give clear direction to applicant so he knows what to bring back. Retterath feels there are two issues: the actual variance request itself and the lack of definition. Smith asked if, as part of a recommendation, we should be able to craft some language, assuming that we get a definition of the variance, it can be evaluated when a permit application comes in is consistent with the approvals granted. -2579- Trapp added two things: 1) in theory add a condition that a portion of the house in the variance area be no more than 25% of the total; and 2) if the commission wants to ask for more information, define what "minimizing the variance" means so the applicant knows what to do. Smieja asked what it was about the potential footprint on the lot that doesn't work for you. Why are you applying for the variance before you've closed on the property? Rock stated that the neighbors would like to keep their view of the lake even though the available footprint allows for more. If the roadway is vacated the 5 feet plus 15 feet of the roadway would allow for the 20 foot front setback. Trapp asked why the house wasn't designed to have the 20 foot setback (front) on the west and 6 feet (side) along Galway. Rock said that these setbacks are about what the setback would be if the front was on the south instead of on the east. Trapp indicated that the argument would be easier to make if the west was established as front. Smith asked if the footprint could be moved 5 feet so the west side conforms to the 20 foot front; or if you can't, why can't you. Rock said that the north was planned at 15 feet because the neighbors didn't want it any closer than that. Regarding the need for retention of Galway access to the lake, he indicated that there was another access to the south of Galway that makes more sense to retain for access. Wendy Edberg (815 Larkspur Court, Shakopee) stated that Justin has been very considerate and conscientious of the neighbors. The proposed driveway will work well. Historically, the Galway access has had very limited use by others. The 15 foot setback on the north is a condition of sale by the adjacent property owner. Justin has spent thousands of dollars already on plans without being the owner of the property. Rock said they are open to any restrictions necessary to move forward. Smieja asked if the numerous corners on the design were to maximize lake view. Rock stated that was true. The plan was a one level rambler designed for long term living. Smith inquired of the commission if they could work towards advancing this request on with a recommendation; if not, give clear direction as to what the commission is looking for. Staff suggests minimizing the variance and recognizing that the house is oriented towards the roadway; increasing the west side setback an additional 5 feet; making south setback 6 feet; restricting the south side variance to 25 -30% of the house at the approved variance setback with the remainder at the established setback. -2580- Trapp /Smith can work with some modifications but the commission needs to feel comfortable. The footprint could be revised as follows: south setback set at 6 feet, west setback increased to 20 feet, remainder the same; the box portion be within the setback line to demonstrate that the applicant is minimizing the variance —that would address some of the concerns of the commission. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the public lands permit with staff recommendations 1 -3 and findings of fact 1 -2. Discussion Retterath asked if there should be any recommendation regarding the driveway width and curb cut issues. Staff indicated that would all be addressed as part of the building permit process. MOTION carried unanimously. Trapp proposed the setback language could be: a minimum of 6 feet on the south, 20 feet on the west, 15 feet on the north and — on the east. Gawtry thought the commission didn't need to address the east setback because the applicants are restricting themselves to be neighborly. Smieja asked if Galway is vacated, which side of the lot would be the front. Smith thought Excelsior Lane would be the front. Retterath stated that if the south setback went to 10 feet with a 20% limit he would have no problem approving. Smith asked Rock if setbacks were 20 feet on the west, 6 feet on the south, 15 feet on the north with a limitation of 20% of the south lot line at the 6 foot setback was something he could work with. Rock said that would work. Smith asked if 10 feet on the south would work. Rock indicated that he would prefer a 6 foot south setback because of the view. Penner polled the group; a 14.9 foot west setback is ok with most. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the variance with staff recommendations 1 -15 and findings of fact 1 -11 and include a recommendation limiting the south setback to no less than 6 feet with a limit of 20% of the total lot length on the south side. MOTION carried. Penner, Gawtry, Goode, Smieja, Stone Wegscheid voting for; Retterath voting against. Retterath findings of fact: minimize the variance; 6 foot south setback is too close —10 feet would be better. OLD /NEW BUSINESS Term expirations — Interviews November 18tH Notice of rescheduled meeting for November to Tuesday, November 18, 2014 due to election. Gawtry will not be in attendance on November 18th Wegscheid clarified that you can ask questions of the applicant regarding their answers on the application specifically or you can generate your own question but it has to be asked of each applicant. He suggests that you create your own question so we can get more information from each candidate rather than just a restatement of the application. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Stone, to adjourn at 9:18 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -2582- Fire Commission Meeting Wednesday November 19, 2014 11:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. General Information and Updates • 2015 Fire Commission meeting schedule - DRAFT • ISO Public Protection Classification— 2014 Audit Results 2. Strategic Planning and Maintaining Fire Protection • National Issue Recruiting and Retention of Paid -On -Call Staff • Consolidation and Shared Services Initiatives (in Minnesota) • Duty Officer Program - Purpose and Focus (6 month evaluation) 3. MFD Financial and Budget - ® 2014 MFD Budget, Projected Year End Fire Fund Balance 4. Hot Topics and Priority Projects • LMCD "Save the Lake" Grant project • FEMA Assistance to Firefighters Grant 2014 project • EMS - Ebola Procedures & Protocols, Narcan - 5. Adjourn Future Meeting Agenda items for January 21, 2015 ® 2014 Year End Report — Run Report and Finances ® 2014 Annual Report Overview • Mound Fire Department Strategic Plan (updated) e Hot Topics and News Items ` -2583- / / / / / / } \ \ / / / \ / / o / /( §) f m CF) o 00 o CY) w// Cl) - § § - \ >i / _ o �F k \ c k R 2 G b m r 00 e e w —J m g$ S S$$ r . . L) \ c \ Lu/- \ cli ƒ �§ > E LL ƒ E & r j g f § §\ ) e\ CO /{ }$ r Cl) r r c r { r I � �!® - (j/ {�� ) E !\, E = m ) / 2 \ R ! ®0 / 3 _ � ) / ) / / » era \ 2 2 e R w. w 7 \ \ o Co ) 2 ƒ c J &6 f n e g o= o k E § 2 ) { ) ( § ( \ \ a \ § \ 2 @ a 2 / § \ $ -2585- ( } } 10411100 11,29 1 04:4 0 H 01 VW 1014105 Igo Fire Protection Area PPC Rating Old vs. New Mound Minnetonka Beach Shorewood With Hydrants Old Nuk} Newest 4 4 4 7 6 4 6 5 N/A Without Rydrants Old NeNa Newest none N/A N/A none N/A N /A. 9 5 5 Spring Park 6 4 4 none N/A N/A Minnetrista 8 4 4 9 j, 5/10 NOTT'; 1). 6 orrcnt 1111C rating was effective sate Mai ell I, 2009 2). Newest PPC rating will be effective .January 1, 2015 NOTES: 1. Residential property insurance rates only improve up to an I.S.O. Rating of 7; anything above a rating of 7 generally does change /reduce insurance premiums for residential properties. 2. The most recent Insurance Services Office (ISO) Public Protection Classification audit for the Mound Fire Dept. and our service area cities was completed in 2014, with the results published and effective date of January 1, 2015. 3. ISO recently changed the Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSPS) system which effects the Public Protection Classification rating for cites. 4. ISO audits are typically done approximately every 5 -6 (was every 10) years. -2586- #.. .A f s cue Truck 5 _ 3 Total 5 ll. Water Rescue Incident Rescue Truck 5 4 Utility Truck 6 4 Fire /Rescue Boat 5 4 Total 14 _ 12� III. Personal Injury Accident Rescue Truck 5 4 Engine - Pumper 5 4 Utility Truck 5 4 Total 15 12 IV. Hazardous Material Response Engine - Pumper #1 5 4 Utility Truck/Trailer 5 4 Engine - Pumper #2 5 4 Rescue Truck 4 3 Total 19 15 V. Structure Fire - Residential Engine - Pumper #1 5 4 (includes Mutual Aid) Engine - Pumper #2 5 4 Utility Truck 5 3 Rescue Truck 5 3 Command Officer 1 1 Total 21 15 VI. Structure Fire - Commercial Engine - Pumper #1 5 4 or Residential with Aerial Ladder Aerial Ladder 4 4 Engine - Pumper #2 5 4 Utility Truck 5 3 Rescue Truck 5 3 Command Officer 1 -25 1 Truck E 19 VII. Other Tanker Tender 3 2 Utility Boat (Zodiac) 2 2 Command Vehicle 1 1 Duty Officer 1 1 1/10/2013 -2587 - E: WiABAS and St. Boni Auto Aid - REVIEW\Response Standards and Response Times\MFD Fire - Rescue Call Response Protocol 01102013 I Flic" I 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 Ln Kt m r�j r*4 -_2588- Ln N I 461 I Is, a I N C y O r ® d E 9 m 0 ` C � iT d_ LL 7 C C 3 m 0 11V� o 1171110 0000' ob0000 O u W n m< � Nq g O O m m m m m U ryO TNTN. N J o n r 0 O Q g O m m m U W� N m LL w 0'a N m d m m A m g 0 r N m d n fp A m W O c N N N CI P N N N n m N N r m N N g O N m r m N *0 N Vm , O N ONI W m N N N NN CO> m N P P N N ('ml m g pp m N ��pp n A N N@ N LL LL N N NNNN m m Ip Q N.- N m NNmNNmNNNNm P N n O O M1 m t0 NN m TIT m m r 2 .1 m m 1 m N Nn + NP' w N 0 m ^ N cc `^ U L m F Y N Q O w 'o 2 V R y O� pp y y .R d r0 c R N= Lm LL LL a E C 3 0@ l@ W 10 n R j N Lw E V m w mLLLLY. C `O • 3 y LL LLLL CLL iL LL HILL ^LL LL' E t Z i t a Nza L8m mc a N y o N n F m m o o o ` w Tw c i W W R c E�w W m :a U U W W C)ym J(7 w LLmQ mLLS Ti 6iLLL m2E E 0 -222 Ti E E m m m -- mLL E w¢Em 227 Pnm €E¢mmEE 2y'u €mE�v, 2u. 2 25 mrn 2mm2 2 in 2': 2 «a<a €Urn 2 L'. MN 2lL LLIL IL Ii 1L IL LL W ILLLLLLLQaY. IL W IL IL IL LLLL W zu gIILLLLLLLLLLLLILLLLLLL LL W LLLLLLLL W LLILLL LLII. ILLLLLLLLL LLLLIL LL. N N m K p m vma U p K *—_ mNmWmmNba 2 i m a K N 9 mZOC m ow > y0'O mmmm O.. m N^ N E m m$ o° E m o rc E E o E Ey.m p R N E o E '� E N N:E >s E E U E Y ^ d m ,6 m m a �' p m E R Z R U'zfm o UU a w GLUU o 0 o n o Um n g y o z LiON mSNmN� m Z 3.. an m00 O�OnSI(fm�000M1 O.n N~Q'E1 -. A NO $n. n m n d dm N Rw'R �Ca -Y °c „ 'Y mm E ilk 15 Y L W F_ S LL u S c c0_c co. n. cLL c > > co_ > c Y c O. c =gg E_�g °E c_�ccg o:o 'a c'o c oo v0 c , m m m m m M m m m n m m n m m m M m m m vy m m m m w m w n m m W N O o F N�V HHNNN,CINN OjNNNN RNNNNHNCNNN A NON�p N' V( V N m Ih m p{ d n N N n q? e- 1 r Q• 0 N m m m g N m a _N N '" eN- W rc Og ry mgmPm m m y y oNmOI m .- dNgP(OPF�mN.- n m r m r m o d mnNmMNO m m r m m o m g m o m N 'N q n m m m m LL N N m m � � no P Q n n n N n n n n 11V� 0 a CD is -tw ;a m Alos o O L6 LL ;a m Alos O I Ln 4� LL. m 4� 00 4� Co CL) 4-0 L- 0 ru V) u a) CL a -0 a . voq � /�� =3 0 CL E ba 0 E m CWL I Ln 4� LL. m 4� 00 4� Co I Ln I V) 4� m 4� 4� Co CL) 4-0 L- 0 ru V) u a) a -0 a =3 0 V E z m d � LL d N 7 O O (D >^ n. Elmo C a m E v CL E 0 a c U5 E C W b d L LL LL LL z O W J � a 0 O f w w z O Q U 0 z O Q U LL N 9 C O O w O d L F C 0 0 C 7 0 d V N V .b d N d w V L r G v m -mlO N m N_R o N O NO A C CL m Cb CD CL V ® d u T O LL r Clt V E z m d � LL d N 7 O O (D >^ n. Elmo C a m E v CL E 0 a c U5 E C W b d L LL LL LL z O W J � a 0 O f w w z O Q U 0 z O Q U LL N 9 C O O w O d L F C 0 0 C 7 0 d V N V .b d N d w V L r G v m -mlO N m N_R N O NO A U y a � m C E V `t. d it 0 o 9 O O Q s d o v LU Y 0 0 � 6 w �'d': (n O O w m G t W I. LL v A y'S W w CL E Ju: m E LL. '� C Q w Q Q V O ,� ?- O' n i U �LL L�2'w , o N U tad r � ®' U CO ®tip: W �j A f/S V® g N 6 O m e 6Y M KS r U b10Z /6I /1 1 .... IElol ja�pngjzopoogdde /ti10Zazg /dsfj�uzz�azi �uez�an3euza3 /nod eaaa3 saoinzasa / /ad��u 80£'L£G $ IoBpns lelol 0$ sa6jego loazlpul 'l 0$ zagl0 q 0$ uollonzlsuo0'6 0$ Ienloealuo0 l 0$ sailddnS a 90E`LE l $ luawdmb3 'p 0$ laAezl 0 0$ slgaua8 a6uud q 0$ leuuoszad 'e sselS loa.g0 la pns - 2597 _. ba6png I3o I aged la2png touebe lezapal e gllan luaw99J6e lsoo l09npui ue aneq nog( Il zo 'golew ajegs lsoo 'loafozd aql uo u01lewzolul apinoid of coeds slgl asn ueo nod, Molaq uopeueldxe Jno/ apnioui '(0) ozaz uegl jaglo saanoS j9gl0 ui amen e pazalua no6li 0$ saoznoS jagl0 'p 0$ le0ol 0 0$ alelS q 8E99 $ lueoi ddy 'e (aag'g g }o aaegg aueogddy aya lenba lsnuw saomosaa jejapaj -uoN paurgwoo agl) seoJnosoZj IeJap93 -uON . 9 ( %) pemv to azegS lueoilddy 9E9'9 $ ajegS lueopddy OLL'M $ aiegs lejapa3 azegS lueollddy pue lezapa3 0$ saxel alels 0$ sa6jego loazlpul 'l 0$ zagl0 q 0$ uollonzlsuo0'6 0$ Ienloealuo0 l 0$ sailddnS a 90E`LE l $ luawdmb3 'p 0$ laAezl 0 0$ slgaua8 a6uud q 0$ leuuoszad 'e sselS loa.g0 la pns - 2597 _. ba6png I3o I aged la2png MFD w: RADIO �K . !% k EMS EVENTS FIRE EVENTS E1- EMS /PRI 1 Fl_ ..... ___ ....... Fire /PRI 1 E3- EMS /PRI 3 F3. . .......... _ ........ Fire /PRI 3 ALLERG- Allergic React ALMAPT ............. ALM Fire /Apartmt ALME -Alarm /Medical ALMBUS ............ ALM Fire /Busines AMPUTA- Amputation ALMCO .........ALM Carbon Monox BLEED - Bleeding ALMCOE............ ALM C/O Medical BONE - Broken Bones ALMFAL .........ALM Fire /False BREATH - Breathing Problem ALMHSE .........ALM Fire /House BURN -Burn ALMSCH.. ....... ...ALM Fire /School CHOKE - Choking ALMT. L ......... ALM Fire/Trouble DIABET - Insulin Problem APPL ..................Appliance Fire DIZZY -Dizzy /Faint APT .................... Apartment Fire DOA - Reported Dead TFIR ......... AssisVFire DOWN - Down /Unk Prob "use for elevators, manpower DROWN- Drowning assists on lifts, searches, etc FALL -Fall BOAT ................. Boat Fire HEAD -Head Injury BUS ................... Business Fire HEART -Heart CAR ....... .- ......... Vehicle Fire ILL -ill CHIM .................. Chimney Fire OB -Birth of Baby CICBURN .........Ck Problem Burn OD -Drug Overdose DRILL ................. Drill or Test PAIN -Pain DUMPF .............. Dumpster Fire POISON - Poison ELEC ................. Electrical Fire SEIZ- Seizure EXPLOS ............. Explosion SHOOT - Shooting FIREd................. Fire Out Report STAB - Stabbing FIREIV' ............... Fire Investigation STROKE - Stroke GARAGE............ Garage Fire SUICID- Suicide GASO - .............. Gas Odor UNCON- Unconscious GRASS .............. Grass Fire AIR- Aircraft Incident HAZMAT ..... ....... Hazardous Matter PI- Accident/Injuries HOUSE.. ............ House Fire Water -Water Incident INSP , ................. 'Inspection Lift Assist -Lift Assist MA (Fire Only).... Mutual Aid PRACTI .............. Practice Burn RESCUE. ........... Rescue /Extricate SCHOOL........,... School Fire important Note: The bold and SMOKE .........;Smoke See /Smell highlighted CAD event codes are the SPILL..'. ......... Spill event types that will be responded to by SYSTEM ............ System Down a`MFD Duty Ofcer'®NLY unless DO TREE ................. Tree /Pole Fire request ALL CALL. WASH ................ Washdown WIREA ............... Wire Arcing WIRED. .........Dire Down f \duty officer program overview 8- 2013 \ems - fire events - duty r2599- v y ® aq C/) O o bq 14 r L OF ,: 1 v F N tO -2600- , 0 N� 4-j 0 ml mr > 719 lc� u 0 E Eu V) E Nt 4-j c) Lr) V) • > C) Col > 0 rn V) 4-a MY O 4-1 UD 0 (3, cf), 0 03 0 0 rn rn 0 0 PL-4 CL4 • r 4-1 CL C4 P O as > 42 0 0 (D O V O O M I- T7 0 0 0 N O O o 0 d U. O O o C 00 07 O O x l8 (O M K! LO 0 0 0 O p O (D O V O O M I- T7 O Q1 0 N O O I U. Hi N C � O l8 (O M K! O = O O O O m 6S, fA t6T 4R M G °' cc IZ N V3 vi ER E9 0 0 O p O 0 0 0 U) n O fl- M O QS 0 0 O O O I U. Hi N V) 0 0 0 S o t6 O 0 QS 0 0 O O O I U. C O p 3 4 � O M r � O N 0 O V N r 00 {p O w N im M r r d � m E E N N d 3 N n x w v o N 'o ¢7 M N O LL v w t1E t6 O t® QS 0® V M M [f9 w U. to � d cn O = O O O O m 6S, fA t6T 4R C O p 3 4 � O M r � O N 0 O V N r 00 {p O w N im M r r d � m E E N N d 3 N n x w v o N 'o ¢7 M N O LL v O 0 ,c co w U. � d cn O = O O O O m Lo co N ,® N co M G °' cc IZ N 6-i E9 (R H r ✓ LO ° M r- u _ r M c W O O O LO � cp 0 8 - C U c � LL v N C N b to 4 c w y Y d d .o m _ L a to 19t C4` Q O O N N M L6 ®9 le N f- W M N co M cl) LO C r co r O cn C C r O a® N Cx M �e W UOI EA 64 EA PH ff7 64 (IV Ma 1A B�Ed:p LU Z W d W _ a4 LL (n w > a O O 0 � O O O O ® V O � C N W cc to O 9 V At Lo r co N m M co to 00 N M 49 LO c O O a� P _M O U> 64 V} 6e3 !fl 4k EA GEA �' fbb Y8 N N N O W oC O. �+ A ca Ca Qi � fn w F W ~ f.F - � m 'L9 f`° 0 O. a U '_ O y d N C L L C- (0 7 N Q O O O O U m �m a`w res 0- C) O O -2603- C O p 3 4 � O M r � O N 0 O V N r 00 {p O w N im M r r d � m E E N N d 3 N n x w v o N 'o ¢7 M N O LL v 0 ,c U. d O = O O O O O O m Lo co � CC) ,® N co M G °' cc IZ N 6-i E9 (R H r d u _ r M c W O O O LO � C m w v w � d O 0 8 - C U c � LL v N C N b to 4 c w y Y d d .o a. 0 ev O L C C O Cx M 0 69 C O p 3 4 � O M r � O N 0 O V N r 00 {p O w N im M r r d � m E E N N d 3 N n x w v o N 'o ¢7 M N O LL WeCAB Annual Meeting Driver Report Oct. 1, 2013 - Sept. 30, 2014 * Eastern Carver County -2604- New Drivers Driver Training Sessions In- Service Meetings 1 -Way Rides Miles Hours Oct 2013 4 1 143 1355 97.75 Nov 2013 1 1 125 1355 79.00 Dec 2013 157 1808 95.25 Jan 2014 157 1569 94.50 Feb 2014 149 1610 99.50 Mar 2014 2 183 2046 113.25 Apr 2014 119 1257 88.75 May 2014 1 1 124 1337 85.25 June 2014 175 2047 117.75 July 2014 2 1 144 1669 95.75 Aug 2014 135 88.00 Sept 2014 3* 1* 110 !18780 80.25 Totals 9 5 2 1721 1135.00 * Eastern Carver County -2604-