The URL can be used to link to this page

2015-07-28 CC Agenda PacketCITY OF M cost, quality; PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA des at a reasonable city: MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2015 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page 1. Open meeting 2. 3. H 5 Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent A eg nda *A. Approve payment of claims 1835 -1866 *B. Approve minutes: July 14, 2015 regular meeting 1867 -1874 *C. Set Special Meetings 1. Workshop for the purpose of discussing water pressure on the Island as 1875 it relates to fire suppression and certain homes: Sept 15, 2015, 7:00pm 2. Workshop for the purpose of discussing the 2016 Proposed Budget and 1876 Levy: Oct 29, 6:30pm *D. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Amendment to Residential Recycling Grant 1877 -1888 Agreement with Hennepin County (A120125) *E. Adopt Resolution Approving First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement 1889 -1899 for Public Lands Permit for Phase 2Improvements in the Harbor District between the City of Mound, Mound HRA and Mound Westonka Rotary Club *F. Adopt Resolution Denying Vacation of North 1/2 of Unimproved Portion of 1900 -1904 Galway Lane (Planning Case No. 15-09) *G. Adopt Resolution Denying Variance for 4730 Galway Road (Planning 1905 -1907 Case No. 15 -10) *H. Adopt Resolution Approving Variance for 4414 Dorchester Road (Planning 1908 -1930 Case No. 15 -15) Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Visit by Alex Stanford, outreach staff for Congressman Erik Paulsen PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. Public HearinE Stacie Kvilvang, Senior Municipal Advisor/Director, Ehlers, Inc., requesting discussion/ 1931 -1940 action on property tax abatement to facilitate the acquisition and refinancing of the Mound Transit Facility and refunding of the HRA Limited Tax Pledge Bonds (Mound Transit Center), Series 2006, in order to achieve interest savings. Requested Action: Adopt Resolution Approving Property Tax Abatements Planning Commission Recommendation Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting discussion/action on 1941 -1958 variance application For house remodel /addition Planning Case No. 15 -13 1729 Dove Lane Applicant: Mike Mann of Lecy Bros, on behalf of owner 9. Eric Hoversten, Public Works Director, requesting discussion /action on Resolution 1959 -1961 Awarding Additional Quoted Work to the 2014/2015 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project to (TBD) in the Amount of (TBD), City Project Nos. PW -14 -05 and PW -I5 -06 10. Eric Hoversten, Public Works Director, requesting discussion /taking comments on the 1962 -1964 Hennepin County Natural Resources Strategic Plan IL Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Councilmembers /City Manager B. Minutes: Planning Commission - June 2, 2015 1965 -1973 Suburban Rate Authority - July 15, 2015 1974 -1977 C. Reports: Finance - 2015 YTD, as of June 30, 2015 1978 -1981 D. Correspondence: 12. Adjourn Note: This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: my -cites m1% OUI crmr; CITY OF MOUND CLAIMS i COUNCIL YEAR BATCH 2015 06-15HOISING 2015 071715CTYMAN 2015 JULY15ELANCC B 2015 072815CITY 2015 072815 H WS ITOTAL CLAIMS 1 -1835- $ 1,995.00 $ 511.25 $ 3,910.14 $ 4,075.32 $ 2,700.00 $ 192,518.67 $ 115,164.92 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/13/15 11:05 AM Page 1 Batch Name 06- 15HOISING User Dollar Amt $1,995.00 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,995.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 6 NOISING TON KOEGLER GROUP,/ _ Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS JUNE 2015 $736.25 Invoice 007- 001 -85 7/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23322 4317 WILSHIRE BLVD VAR 4317 WILSHIRE EP PLANNING SVCS JUNE $183.25 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23324 LOST LAKE HOMES CUP P THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE PLANNING $20.75 SVCS JUNE 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23329 Galway Road PC #15- 9 -15 -1 4730 GALWAY RD VACATION PLANNING $207.50 SVCS JUNE 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/1012015 Cash Payment G 101 -23330 PC -15 -11 5139 Waterbury R 5139 WATERBURY VAR - PLANNING SVCS $660.50 JUNE 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23331 PC -15 -12 2945 Cambridge L 2945 CAMBRIDGE LN VAR - PLANNING SVCS $124.50 JUNE 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23332 PC15 -13 1729 DOVE LN 1729 DOVE LN VAR- PLANNING SVCS JUNE $20.75 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/10/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -23333 PC15 -15 4414 DORCHESTE 4414 DORCHESTER RD VAR- PLANNING $20.75 SVCS JUNE 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/1012015 Cash Payment G 101 -23334 PC 15 -14 2642 COMMERCE 2642 COMMERCE CUP PLANNING SVCS $20.75 JUNE 2015 Invoice 015 -015 -3 7/10/2015 Transaction Date 7/13/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,995.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,995.00 $1,995.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,995.00 Total $1,995.00 -1836- Batch Name 071715CTYMAN Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 User Dollar Amt $511.25 Computer Dollar Amt $511.25 $0.00 In Balance 07/17/15 9:49 AM Page 1 Refer 4 HOVERSTEN, ERIC Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -433 Dues and Subscriptions REIMB- AMERICAN PUB WRKS ASSOC & MN $134.75 CHAPTER ANNUAL DUES- E. HOVERSTEN Invoice 071715 7113/2015 Project 15 -5 Transaction Date 7/17/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $134.75 Refer �. 1 MWHS BOYS HOCKEY BOOSTERS _ Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -210 Operating Supplies 15 BAGS SALT PELLETS CITY HALL $101.25 Invoice 071715 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies 15 BAGS SALT PELLETS - FIRE DEPT $101.25 Invoice 071715 7/13/2015 Transaction Date 7/17/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $202.50 Refer 2 STANCHFIELD, RONALD _ Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -331 Use of personal auto REIMB MILEAGE- DOCK INSPECTION 6 -15- $23.00 15 THRU 6 -24 -15 R. STANCHFIELD Invoice 071715 7/8/2015 Transaction Date 7/17/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.00 Refer 3 WANG, ZIYAO Cash Payment R 101- 42000 -32210 Building Permits REFUND CANCELLED BUILDING PERMIT $150.00 #2015 - 00467 -Z. WANG -4874 DRUMMOND RD Invoice 071715 7/15/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -20800 Due to Other Governments REFUND CANCELLED BUILDING PERMIT $1.00 #2015- 00467 -Z. WANG -4874 DRUMMOND RD Invoice 071715 7/15/2015 Transaction Date 711712015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $252.25 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $101.25 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $23.00 602 SEWER FUND $134.75 $511.25 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $511.25 Total $511.25 -1837- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/17/15 9:32 AM Page 1 Batch Name JULY15ELANCC User Dollar Amt $3,910.14 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,910.14 $0.00 In Balance Refer 7 ELAN CREDIT CARD Ck# 053934E 7/1712015 Cash Payment E 101- 41110 -431 Meeting Expense CARIBOU COFFEE- MAYOR'S MTG W/ AREA $50.41 CITIES RE: MET COUNCIL Invoice 072315 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply AVIAN CONTROL BIRD REPELLANT- PARKS $721.86 Invoice 072315 6/17/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -42400 -210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM. SPEECH RECOGNITION $144.31 COMPUTER SOFTWARE & MICROPHONE- S. SMITH Invoice 072315 6/24/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies VARIDESK- STANDING WORKSTATION- E. $375.00 HOVERSTEN Invoice 072315 6/25/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -210 Operating Supplies VARIDESK- STANDING WORKSTATION- K. $375.00 KELLY Invoice 072315 612512015 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -210 Operating Supplies VARIDESK- STANDING WORKSTATION- N. $400.00 IVERSON Invoice 072315 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -219 Safety supplies VARIDESK- STANDING WORKSTATION- V. $375.00 WEBER Invoice 072315 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -219 Safety supplies VARIDESK- STANDING WORKSTATION- G. $375.00 PEDERSON Invoice 072315 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -300 Professional Srvs GOVT FINANCE - ACHIEVEMENT AWARD $435.00 APP- COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Invoice 072315 6/9/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts TARGET- PORTABLE HARD DRIVE $192.35 UPGRADE- CAMERA TRUCK -SEWER Invoice 072315 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair AIR ENGINEERING & SUPPLY- 4 -WAY $112.15 TOGGLE VALVE- ENGINE #29 Invoice 072315 6/9/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies AMAZON.COM- 100 10 MIL TAG LAMINATING $10.12 POUCHES & 6" LOOPS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 072315 6116/2015 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair WHOLESALE ELECTRONICS INC- FAN FOR $39.58 GENERATOR- UNIT #22 Invoice 072315 6/16/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -210 Operating Supplies DUANE'S 66 SVC- PROPANE TANK REFILL $30.00 Invoice 072315 6/1912015 Cash Payment G 222 -22801 Deposits /Escrow HANS BAKERY- BAKERY GOODS FOR FISH $99.90 FRY VOLUNTEERS- A.M. SET UP- REIMBURSED FROM FIRE RELIEF ASSOC 6- 16-15 Invoice 072315 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -200 Office Supplies SAM'S CLUB- 4 INK CARTRIDGES- FIRE $174.46 DEPT Invoice 072315 71212015 '1'838" Transaction Date 7/14/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,910.14 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,126.58 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1,216.21 602 SEWER FUND $567.35 $3,910.14 Pre - Written Check $3,910.14 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $3,910.14 CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1511:14 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: July 2015 E+ �3L.�'r 3rkhV1'S11�A , Batch Name 0715UBREFND User Dollar Amt $4,075.32 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $4,075.32 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS INC _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4874 DRUMMOND RD- UTILITY REFUND- $60.42 ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS INC Invoice 072415 7122/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.42 Refer 2 BURNET TITLE- EDINA _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1580 HERON LN- UTILITY REFUND- BURNET $283.61 TITLE Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $283.61 Refer µ� 3 CAMBRIA TITLE Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 6189 SUGAR MILL LN- UTILITY REFUND- $190.96 CAMBRIA TITLE Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $190.96 Refer- 5 DAHM, DOUGLAS_ _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4915 EDGEWATER DR- UTILITY REFUND -D. $15.19 DAHM Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ~TMak $15.19 Refer .„.�„�. 4 EDINA REALTY TITLE Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4977 BRUNSWICK RD- UTILITY REFUND- $291.13 EDINA REALTY TITLE Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4877 BARTLETT BLVD- UTILITY REFUND- $292.99 EDINA REALTY TITLE Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1676 CANARY LN- UTILITY REFUND- EDINA $182.00 REALTY TITLE Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ,.mw.»..�.,�.�..,,aw $766.12 Refer 6 EXECUTIVE TITTLE INC. -G Vim.,- Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5966 CHESTNUT RD- UTILITY REFUND- $271.27 EXECUTIVE TITLE GV Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/2312015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $271.27 Refer 7 HOME TITLE LLC -B VILLE Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2116 BASSWOOD LN- UTILITY REFUND- $194.92 HOME TITLE LLC - BVILLE Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/2312015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $194.92 Refer 8 JOHN, BRIAN Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5001 THREE PTS BLVD- UTILITY REFUND- B. $522.64 JOHN Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 -1840- CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1511:14 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: July 2015 'Lh`� >SWTM'aeliSs`+''k'1�SW�4" ``i`�45`v s.1 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total � .„ �.„, �._.,,,... �... �.. a,-. �.., ,..�....�- .,�..�....a..�..„.�. $522.64 Refer N� 9 MINNETONKA TITLE Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5772 SUNSET RD- UTILITY REFUND- $242.06 MINNETONKA TITLE Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $242.06 Refer 10 NAGATORI, DAVE _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2900 TUXEDO BLVD- UTILITY REFUND- D. $16.72 NAGATORI Invoice 072415 712212015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16.72 Refer 11�NTC 11 LLC Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5081 SHORELINE DR- UTILITY REFUND- NTC $286.12 II LLC Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $286.12 Refer 15 RESEMIUS, MICHELLE _ Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5000 TUXEDO BLVD- UTILITY REFUND- M. $30.79 RESEMIUS Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.79 Refer 12 TITLE ONE, INC. BLMGT Cash Payment R 601 -49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4869 HANOVER RD- UTILITY REFUND- TITLE $154.61 ONE -BLMGT Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Refer 13 TITLE SMART INC. -EDINA Wells Fargo 10100 Total $154.61 Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 3331 TUXEDO BLVD- UTILITY REFUND- $337.40 TITLE SMART INC. -EDINA Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 _ Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $337.40 _Refer 14 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY, LLC�� Cash Payment R 601- 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4713 GORDON RD- UTILITY REFUND- $388.34 WATERMARK TITLE Invoice 072415 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $388.34 Refer 16 WIETZ, MIRIAM _ Cash Payment R 601 - 49400 -36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5969 LYNWOOD BLVD- UTILITY REFUND -M. WIETZ Invoice 072415 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 :m Total $314.15 $314.15 CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1511:14 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: July 2015 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 601 WATER FUND $4,075.32 $4,075.32 Pre- Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $4,075.32 Total $4,075.32 -1842- 1 r. 9 4 0 ► j Payments Current Period: July 2015 Batch Name BONDFEES User Dollar Amt Payments Computer DollarAmt $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer _ 1 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPOR _ Cash Payment E 361- 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Improvement Bonds, 2007A Fiscal agent Fee Invoice 26457 6/4/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 07123/15 1:22 PM Page 1 $450.00 Total $450.00 Refer 2 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPOR _ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Revenue Bonds, 20078- Fiscal agent fee $160.Oc Invoice 26458 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Revenue Bonds, 20078 Fiscal Agent Fee $215.00 Invoice 26458 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 675 -49425 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Revenue Bonds, 2007B Fiscal Agent Fee $75.00 Invoice 26458 614/2015 Transaction Date 7121/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00 Referw 3 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPOR _ Cash Payment _ E 375 - 47200 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, 2009D- Fiscal $450.00 agaent fee Invoice 26459 6/4/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00 Refer- .- .,.m,,,.,....,..4 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPOR _ � Cash Payment E 370- 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Refunding Bonds, 2011A Fiscal agent Fee $330.00 Invoice 26460 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Refunding Bonds, 2011A Fiscal agent Fee $80.00 Invoice 26460 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Refunding Bonds, 2011A Fiscal Agent Fee $40.00 Invoice 26460 6/4/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00 Refer m 6 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPOR Cash Payment E 355 - 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Improvement/Revenue Bonds, 2014A $70.00 Fiscal Agent Fee Invoice 26462 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Improvement/Revenue Bonds, 2014A $110.00 Fiscal Agent Fee Invoice 26462 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Improvement/Revenue Bonds, 2014A $230.00 Fiscal Agent Fee Invoice 26462 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 675 - 49425 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Improvement/Revenue Bonds, 2014A $40.00 Fiscal Agent Fee Invoice 26462 6/4/2015 Transaction Date 7/2112015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $450.00 Refer � 5 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPOR Cash Payment E 355 - 47000 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Taxable Bonds, 2013B- Fiscal Agent Fee $270.00 Invoice 26461 6/4/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -620 Fiscal Agent s Fees G.O. Taxable Bonds, 2013B- Fiscal Agent Fee $180.00 Invoice 26461 6/4/2015 -1843- Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Fund Summary 355 2003 -C G.O. TIF 1 -2 361 G.O. 2007 - A Improvements 370 2011A REFUNDING BONDS 375 TIF 1 -3 Debt Service 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 Wells Fargo 10100 10100 Wells Fargo $340.00 $450.00 $330.00 $450.00 $470.00 $505.00 $155.00 $2,700.00 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,700.00 Total $2,700.00 ff ;.. 07/23/15 1:22 PM Page 2 Total $450.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 1 knu,l \t Batch Name 072815CITY User Dollar Amt $192,518.67 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $192,518.67 $0.00 In Balance Refer 3 ANDERSEN, EARL F., INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials SIGN POST COUPLERS -5 - STREEETS $288.50 Invoice 0108118 6/2312015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials ROUND TUBE COUPLERS -5- STREETS $330.20 Invoice 0108012 6/17/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $618.70 Refer 22 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -210 Operating Supplies COFFEE, CREAMER, FIREMEN $63.00 Invoice M19772 7/8/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6100 Refer 4 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair 50/50 antifreeze- 2 gals $20.66 Invoice 6974 - 251817 6/27/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -409 Other Equipment Repair MANUAL VENT FUEL CAP #28- FIRE DEPT $11.69 Invoice 6974 - 252163 7/2/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.35 Refer CARQUEST OF NAVARRE(PAM Cash Payment E 1.01 -45200 -221 Equipment Parts STD MINIATURE LAMP -PARKS VEHICLE $12.50 Invoice 6974- 250673 6/11/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -221 Equipment Parts BATTERY CABLES- SEWER #105 $31.59 Invoice 6974 - 250769 6/12/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts BATTERY CABLE LUG, BULK BATTERY $16.71 CABLES- TRUCK #105 Invoice 6974- 250782 6/12/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -221 Equipment Parts RETURN FUEL FILTER & POLY RIB GOLD - $24.59 BELTS Invoice 6974 - 250842 6/15/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials 50 PVC SPLIT LOOM, 50 LOOM $19.30 Invoice 6974 - 250851 6/15/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials HO SILICONESPRAY $7.16 Invoice 6974 - 251056 6/17/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -221 Equipment Parts BEARINGS #407 $68.44 Invoice 6974 - 251075 6/17/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -230 Shop Materials ENGINE DEGREASER HD GEL- PARKS $11.76 Invoice 6974 - 251092 6/17/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts MARINE DEEP CYCLE 550 CCA -PARKS $67.19 Invoice 6974 - 251243 6/19/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $210.06 60 CEMETERIES, MINNESOTA ASSO _Refer, Cash Payment E 101 - 45250 -433 Dues and Subscriptions 2015 MEMBERSHIP DUES- MN ASSOC OF $66.00 CEMETERIES Invoice 072815 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.00 Refer � 59 CITIES DIGITAL SOLUTIONS 1845- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 2 Cash Payment E 101 -41920 -440 Other Contractual Servic LASERFICHE ANNUAL MTCE SUPPORT & $1,633.00 UPDATES - CONTRACT RENEWAL 9 -23 -15 THRU 9 -23 -16 Invoice 36360 7/2212015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer DELL MARKETING L.P. Total $1,633.00 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft DELL OPTIPLEX 9020 4GB PC -G. PEDERSON Invoice XJPWTDR32 71912015 PO 24596 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft DELL OPTIPLEX 9020 4GB PC- SIGN SHOP - STREETS Invoice XJPT2R383 7/2/2015 PO 24594 6/15/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft DELL OPTIPLEX 9020 4GB PC- WATER DEPT Invoice XJPT2R383 7/2/2015 PO 24594 Refer Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -205 Computer Hardware /Soft DELL OPTIPLEX 9020 4GB PC- SEWER DEPT Invoice XJPT2R383 7/2/2015 P024594 2015 WAFTA DUES Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 7 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS_ Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials WHITE & YELLOW TRAFFIC PAINT Invoice 802160425 6/2/2015 PO 24547 E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer KA,I DOCK MASTERS OF LAKE MT� _ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic REPAIR LAUNCH & PUBLIC DOCK @ , ..».,..w..,..,...�..»,....�,.. Cash Payment SURFSIDE Invoice 202761 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -440 Other Contractual Servic GULL LANE COMMONS ACCESS - INSTALL ADDTL DOCK SECTIONS Invoice 202760 6/15/2015 Transaction Date 7/2112015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 53 EDEN PRAIRIE, CITY OF .,,..,. N.,,.. W,..,. ��,... .......... ........�.�„�ma»�,,...,,..n,u„ Cash Payment E222-42260-433 Dues and Subscriptions 2015 WAFTA DUES Invoice 2872 7/1/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer - -�� -9 ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT AN_�� -� Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -221 Equipment Parts HOSE SUCTION HD, CLAMPS- #304 Invoice 11974 5/7/2015 Transaction Date 5/19/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer X52 FIRE CA TT L. L. C. ,.,» , ..».,..w..,..,...�..»,....�,.. Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE HOSE TESTING - 16,475 FEET; GROOUND LADDER TESTING Total Total Total $699.00 $699.00 $699.00 $699.00 $2,796.00 $1,195.75 $1,195.75 $57.50 $533.00 $590.50 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $596.36 $596.36 $5,238.25 Invoice MN -4721 6/27/2015 Transaction Date 7/2012015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,238.25 Refer FLEETPRIDE TRUCK & TRAILER P Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -221 Equipment Parts CAN -TYPE FUEL FILTER #704 $9.26 Invoice 68720149 5/2012015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -221 Equipment Parts CAN -TYPE FUEL FILTER #704 $9.26 Invoice 68720149 5120/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18,52 Rcf t t (: R K SFRI /ICF.0 '146' CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 3 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -460 Janitorial Services HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 7 -06 -15 $102.27 Invoice 1006182530 7/612015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -460 Janitorial Services HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 7 -13 -15 $109.15 Invoice 1006193916 7113/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -460 Janitorial Services HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 7 -20 -15 $153.50 Invoice 1006205258 7/20/2015 Transaction Date 7121/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $364.92 Refer 13 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -29 -15 PARKS $53.04 Invoice 1006171246 6/29/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies SHOP SUPPLIES 6 -29 -15 PARKS $78.61 Invoice 1006171246 6/29/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 7 -6 -15 PARKS $58.74 Invoice 1006182536 716/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 7 -6 -15 PARKS $90.84 Invoice 1006182536 7/6/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $281.23 Refer, � 12 G & K SER_VICES��.�- ��.��_ Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 7 -6 -15 $55.73 Invoice 1006182534 7/6/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 7 -6 -15 $53.00 Invoice 1006182534 716/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 7 -6 -15 $54.10 Invoice 1006182534 7/6/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 7 -6 -15 $258.22 Invoice 1006182534 7/6/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -22 -15 $57.90 Invoice 1006159918 6122/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -22 -15 $55.17 Invoice 1006159918 6/22/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6 -22 -15 $68.39 Invoice 1006159918 6122/2015 Cash Payment E 602 -49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 6 -22 -15 $127.19 Invoice 1006159918 6122/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 7 -13 -15 $69.38 Invoice 1006193923 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 7 -13 -15 $66.44 Invoice 1006193923 7113/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 7 -13 -15 $67.61 Invoice 1006193923 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 7 -13 -15 $417.73 Invoice 1006193923 7/13/2015 Project 15 -3 Transaction Date 7/20/2015 �..,.. �.,,..<.». �., Wells Fargo 10100 Total �,.,.,. �..,n.,... �.....,. �.., �.. _. n... �.,..... �..:. ,�..,,....�n.,,..m��u�v�� $1,350.86 -W- Refer 14 HARTMAN, FRED_ RICKwWh.... Cash Payment E 281 - 45210 -331 Use of personal auto REIMB MILEAGE- DOCK INSPECTIONS- F. $12.54 HARTMAN JULY 2015 Invoice 072815 7/21/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Farnn 10100 Total $12.54 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 4 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising TABLECOVER, PRETZELS- SURFSIDE BEER $8.57 PROMO EVENT 6 -25 -15 HWS Invoice 072815 6/25/2015 Refer 15 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED _ 6125/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -227 Chemicals 150 LB CHLORINE CYLINDERS & BULK $2,809.36 Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival HUDROFLUOSILICIC ACID Invoice 3741480 6/18/2015 Transaction Date 7/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,809.36 Refer 16 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD �_ .�.....,.�a.�,.,� .,.�...m.m�,... Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -210 Operating Supplies CAP HUB, WATER METER, CAST IRON $595.82 FLANGE KIT Invoice E113376 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -210 Operating Supplies WATER METER COUPLING, RUBBER METER $41.40 WASHERS -100 Invoice E089521 6/19/2015 Transaction Date 7121/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $637.22 Refer HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMA TIO Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $127.28 JUNE 2015 Invoice 1000062546 7/7/2015 Project 15 -3 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -418 Other Rentals FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $796.17 ADMINISTRATION FEE - JUNE 2015 Invoice 1000062479 7/612015 Transaction Date 7120/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ........... $923.45 Refer 18 HENNEPIN COUNTY RECORDER��..»., a�....,... a. ...�,..�,,.,.,.»...,r�,a,_.,M.. Cash Payment G 101 -23334 PC 15-142642 COMMERCE MAILING LABELS- HENNEPIN COUNTY- $62.50 IDENTIFY & NOTIFY- 350- FEET PC 15 -14 2642 COMMERCE BLVD Invoice 2015 -31 7/1312015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $62.50 Refer 19 HENNEPIN COUNTY RECORDER��«.�,.np�� Cash Payment G 101 -23328 5103 Windsor RD PC15 -07 S ABSTRACT & TORRENS RECORDING -HENN $48.00 CTY -PC 14 -24 2217 CHATEAU Invoice 072815 6/30/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $48.00 Refer 20 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FRESH LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $12.63 Invoice 072815 6/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FRESH LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $4.74 Invoice 072815 6/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FRESH LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $31.50 Invoice 072815 6/2512015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising TABLECOVER, PRETZELS- SURFSIDE BEER $8.57 PROMO EVENT 6 -25 -15 HWS Invoice 072815 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 072815 6125/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 072815 6/29/2015 Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival Invoice 072815 7/15/2015 BATTERIES FOR CAMERA- HWS $2.88 GARBAGE BAGS- HWS $10.25 HEFTY FREEZER BAGS, GAL FREEZER $6.66 BAGS- SPIRIT OF THE LAKES :". CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2016 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 5 ri:YY,- S.iYSry 1SA?. S\` kS+ v '41"`aa4'k»al"'eaiiv`"'nR`U... 7/1/2015 ,.a "ktaW"."wYa�ti'§?4t Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R FRESH LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $31.00 Invoice 072815 7/1012015 711/2015 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -210 Operating Supplies REFRIGERATOR BAKING SODA- HWS $1.85 Invoice 072815 7/20/2015 7/1/2015 Cash Payment Transaction Date 7/2112015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $110.08 Refer_ 21 LAWS ON PRODUCTS, INC,,.,,... ....,,.,,...,,,...,...».�....,~ 7/1/2015 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -230 Shop Materials MISC PARTS- STREET DEPT- BRAKE $197.31 E 101 -43100 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 KLEAN, AMP AUTOFUSES, NYLON CABLE Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 TIES Cash Payment Invoice 9303344357 6/11/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 9303373515 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply BLACK LIGHTNING NITRILE GLOVES- PARKS MISC PARTS- PARKS DEPT- BRAKE KLEAN, NUT & BOLT LOOSENER, CABLE TIES, JOBBER DRILL BITS, THREADLOCKER, CHOP SAW CUT OFF WHEEL, HEAT SHRINK, AMP AUTOFUSES, MINI FUSES Invoice 9303374048 6125/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 23 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 711/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41600 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41910 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42110 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -43100 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -361 General Liability Ins Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 -1849- $24.12 $364.83 $586.26 $1,978.38 $531.04 $728.88 $132.76 $0.00 $1,327.60 $80.70 $689.83 $4,373.26 $989.19 $5,206.27 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07123/15 9:11 AM Page 6 $>;, 1 Sit 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,832.61 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 7/1/2015 Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $7,434.00 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,379.66 7/112015 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 E 281 -45210 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP Invoice 50363 711/2015 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $4,425.33 E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $2,200.00 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 50353 711/2015 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $4,112.95 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 7/1/2015 Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 -1850- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $6,434.95 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -361 General Liability Ins 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 GEN LIAB INS 2 -1- $1,327.60 15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 50363 7/1/2015 Transaction Date 712112015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35,551.01 Refer 24 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _ Cash Payment E 101 -41110 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $12.50 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $125.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41500 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $625.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101-42110-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $0.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42400 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $375.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 43100 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $4,571.25 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $2,650.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $7,434.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/112015 Cash Payment E 281 -45210 -151 Workers Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $0.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $2,200.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP $2,650.00 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 -1850- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP Invoice 2020357 7/9/2015 Transaction Date 7/20/2015 Wells Fargo HRA 10120 Refer 26 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPO_�� Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 -COLOR OVERAGE - 6/14/15 TO 7/13/15 Invoice 2017260 7/2/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 -COLOR OVERAGE - 6/14/15 TO 7/13/15 Total Invoice 2017260 7/2/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 PW COPIER OVERAGE CHG 6 -10 -15 TO 7 -9 -15 Invoice 2019021 7/7/2015 Project 15 -3 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer �.. 27 MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSON, L_�� Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES - JUNE 2015 Invoice 072815 7/112015 Transaction Date 7120/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer..,- ..,.a.�.,.�w.»..w33 MCFOA . �n., ., w. �. �,.. ....._ M..,.,,., �.. �. u.,,..,...,, �., �............,..................,....,.,,... �__ m. _...�.�..,,d...�,�..,x.�.,.,..� 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 7 $1,750.00 $0.00 $22,392.75 $132.61 $142.26 $274.87 $151.59 $123.50 $3.55 $278.64 $132.00 $132.00 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 7116/2015 Cash Payment E 675- 49425 -151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 3RD INSTALLMENT 2015 WORKERS COMP Transaction Date 7/2212015 INS 2 -1 -15 THRU 2 -1 -16 Invoice 30293 7/1/2015 MEDIACOM. �,. �., m,,. w,:. d ............. a.,.,,:..>..,,.,,., Transaction Date 7/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer__ 25 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPO $95.90 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -202 Duplicating and copying COPIER OVERAGE CHARGES BLACK & Invoice 072815 WHITE 4 -20 -15 THRU 7 -19 -15 Invoice 2020357 7/9/2015 Transaction Date Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -202 Duplicating and copying COPIER OVERAGE CHARGES BLACK & Refer �. 34 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTYMANA_�pn��m�wm WHITE 4 -20 -15 THRU 7 -19 -15 Invoice 2020357 7/9/2015 Transaction Date 7/20/2015 Wells Fargo HRA 10120 Refer 26 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPO_�� Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 -COLOR OVERAGE - 6/14/15 TO 7/13/15 Invoice 2017260 7/2/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 -COLOR OVERAGE - 6/14/15 TO 7/13/15 Total Invoice 2017260 7/2/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 PW COPIER OVERAGE CHG 6 -10 -15 TO 7 -9 -15 Invoice 2019021 7/7/2015 Project 15 -3 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer �.. 27 MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSON, L_�� Cash Payment E 101- 49999 -300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES - JUNE 2015 Invoice 072815 7/112015 Transaction Date 7120/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer..,- ..,.a.�.,.�w.»..w33 MCFOA . �n., ., w. �. �,.. ....._ M..,.,,., �.. �. u.,,..,...,, �., �............,..................,....,.,,... �__ m. _...�.�..,,d...�,�..,x.�.,.,..� 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 7 $1,750.00 $0.00 $22,392.75 $132.61 $142.26 $274.87 $151.59 $123.50 $3.55 $278.64 $132.00 $132.00 Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions MCFOA MEMBERSHIP DUES 2015 K. KELLY $35.00 Invoice 072815 7116/2015 Transaction Date 7/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.00 Refer ...�..,A.,_M.,...28 MEDIACOM. �,. �., m,,. w,:. d ............. a.,.,,:..>..,,.,,., �.,,. �,,, �..,....,.,,,. �..,,. M,,....,, �..... a. �... a, m.,,,... w„...,. a. m ,..�.�,...so.®.,�,�..„�,�.,.�. Cash Payment E 101- 42110 -321 Telephone & Cells ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 7 -16 -15 THRU 8- $95.90 15 -15 Invoice 072815 7/6/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.90 Refer �. 34 MINNESOTA CITY /COUNTYMANA_�pn��m�wm Cash Payment E 101- 41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions MN CITY /COUNTY MGMT MEMBERSHIP $69.31 DUES 2015 K. KELLY Invoice 072815 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 101 -41500 -433 Dues and Subscriptions ASSOC OF PUB MGMT PROFESSIONALS $30.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 2015 K. KELLY Invoice 072815 7/16/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.31 Refer 51 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH -1851- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 8 Invoice 778465422001 7/1/2015 PO 24441 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68.25 Refer _ 36 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -200 Office Supplies ASTROBRITE COLORED PAPER, $7.98 Invoice 778868878001 7/6/2015 PO 24575 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -200 Office Supplies WRITING PADS, HIGHLIGHTERS, COLORED $50.57 Invoice 778868749001 7/6/2015 PO 24575 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 778868749001 7/6/2015 PO 24575 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 780616974001 7/14/2015 PO 24576 Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival Invoice 780618060001 7/1412015 PO 24576 Transaction Date 2/16/2015 Refer 38 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. u Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 614851 -10 -14 10/31/2014 PAPER, LASER TONER CARATRIDGE- K. HANSON $54.45 PAPER CUTTER- 15 $103.99 SHARPIE MARKERS FOR SPIRIT OF THE $15.92 LAKES FESTIVAL Wells Fargo 10100 Total $232.91 PUB WKS HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 RENTAL NOV THRU JAN 2015 Project 15 -3 -1852- Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -433 Dues and Subscriptions WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM OPERATOR $23.00 CLASS D CERTIFICATION RENEWAL -B. BUNN Invoice 072815 6/16/2015 Transaction Date 7/20/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.00 Refer 31 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LAS..,��.».w...Ma,..,�.�.mm~ Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $77.50 WATER TESTS -10 - Invoice 764215 7/13/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.50 Refer MINT ROOFING Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -500 Capital Outlay FA ROOFING REPAIR- CENTENNIAL BLDG - $5,999.00 SECTIONS 1-4 Invoice 58559 4121/2015 PO 24535 Transaction Date 7/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,999.00 Refer X32 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -124 Fire Pens Contrib JULY 2015 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION $10,416.67 CONTRIBUTION Invoice 0728815 7/112015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 N,- --. w,�.,�,,..,. Wells Fargo 10100 Total .,,,.. �.....-, �., �. w„.-,,..-.,.-,,... �,.. ,�.�..,.,.�,�....�.�...,a,.aw.. ....,.�.,..._.�,,.- $10,416.67 Refer_ - NEWMAN SIGNS _ _35 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -226 Sign Repair Materials BLANK SIGN SHEETS- SPEC NOTCHED $731.03 Invoice T10287136 6124/2015 PO 24550 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $731.03 37 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -200 Office Supplies INK JET PRINTER COLOR CARTRIDGES, $68.25 LAMINATING SHEETS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 778465422001 7/1/2015 PO 24441 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68.25 Refer _ 36 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -200 Office Supplies ASTROBRITE COLORED PAPER, $7.98 Invoice 778868878001 7/6/2015 PO 24575 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -200 Office Supplies WRITING PADS, HIGHLIGHTERS, COLORED $50.57 Invoice 778868749001 7/6/2015 PO 24575 Cash Payment E 101 - 41310 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 778868749001 7/6/2015 PO 24575 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -200 Office Supplies Invoice 780616974001 7/14/2015 PO 24576 Cash Payment G 101 -22802 Festival Invoice 780618060001 7/1412015 PO 24576 Transaction Date 2/16/2015 Refer 38 PREMIUM WATERS, INC. u Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 614851 -10 -14 10/31/2014 PAPER, LASER TONER CARATRIDGE- K. HANSON $54.45 PAPER CUTTER- 15 $103.99 SHARPIE MARKERS FOR SPIRIT OF THE $15.92 LAKES FESTIVAL Wells Fargo 10100 Total $232.91 PUB WKS HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 RENTAL NOV THRU JAN 2015 Project 15 -3 -1852- CITY OF MOUND 07/23/159:11 AM Page 9 Payments Current Period: July 2015 Cash Payment E 101 -41930 -210 Operating Supplies CITY HALL HOT & COLD WATER COOLER $68.85 RENTAL NOV THRU JAN 2015 Invoice 614850 -10 -14 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41310 -210 Operating Supplies KANDIYOHI 5 GAL WATER & DEPOSIT- HOT $18.29 & COLD WATER COOLER- CITY MGR Invoice 603679 -10 -14 10/31/2014 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -210 Operating Supplies NOV THRU JAN 2015 HOT & COLD WATER $68.85 COOLER- CENT BLDG Invoice 604558 -10 -14 10/31/2014 Transaction Date 2/16/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $224.84 Refer 39 R. C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED_ Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -223 Building Repair Supplies REPLACE PVC BOX & WIRES- SKATE PARK $217.60 Invoice 4728 6/17/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $217.60 Refer 1 SIMPLEX GRINNELL�� Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE ALARM, EXTINGUISHER, & SPRINKLER $594.00 TEST, INSPECTION & MONITORING 6 -1 -15 THRU 5 -31 -16 PARKING DECK Invoice 21312589 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE ALARM, EXTINGUISHER, & SPRINKLER $215.00 TEST, INSPECTION & MONITORING 6 -1 -15 THRU 5 -31 -16 PARKS SHOP Invoice 21312589 612512015 Cash Payment E 101 - 41930 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE ALARM, EXTINGUISHER, & SPRINKLER $966.00 TEST, INSPECTION & MONITORING 6 -1 -15 THRU 5 -31 -16 CITY HALL Invoice 21312589 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE ALARM, EXTINGUISHER, & SPRINKLER $966.00 TEST, INSPECTION & MONITORING 6 -1 -15 THRU 5 -31 -16 FIRE DEPT Invoice 21312589 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE ALARM, EXTINGUISHER, & SPRINKLER $499.00 TEST, INSPECTION & MONITORING 6 -1 -15 THRU 5 -31 -16 HWS Invoice 21312589 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE ALARM, EXTINGUISHER, & SPRINKLER $821.00 TEST, INSPECTION & MONITORING 6 -1 -15 THRU 5 -31 -16 CENTENNIAL BLDG Invoice 21312589 6/25/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE ALARM, EXTINGUISHER, & SPRINKLER $832.00 TEST, INSPECTION & MONITORING 6 -1 -15 THRU 5 -31 -16 PUB WKS BLDG Invoice 21312589 6/2512015 Project 15 -3 Transaction Date 7/1412015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,893.00 Refer 40 SOUTHWEST NEWSPAPERST�M4 4.,.��.......,n.».�,,,�- ..�.,N. w,,,.. .- ,....»...,..w.,,�.,...�,�..., Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -340 Advertising DISPLAY AD LAKESHORE WEEKLY NEWS 6- $430.60 9 -15 Invoice 1800842 6/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -340 Advertising SURFSIDE BEER AD LAKESHORE WEEKLY $430,50 NEWS 6 -16 -15 Invoice 1803097 6/16/2015 -1853- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07123115 9:11 AM Page 10 Invoice 125604 Cash Payment Invoice 126103 Transaction Date Refer W 6/3/2015 E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies 6/18/2015 7/22/2015 54 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -340 Advertising SURFSIDE BEER AD LAKESHORE WEEKLY $430.60 7/2212015 Refer NEWS 6 -23 -15 Cash Payment Invoice 1803800 6/23/2015 6/112015 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -328 Employment Advertising LIQUOR SALES CLERK HELP WANTED AD 6- $287.97 E 101- 45200 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125605 16 -15 & 6 -23 -15 Cash Payment Invoice 1803801 6/23/2015 Transaction Date 7/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,579.77 41 STANCHFIELD, RO_N_ALD��_�� _Refer Cash Payment E 281- 45210 -331 Use of personal auto REIMB MILEAGE- DOCK INSPECTIONS- R. $5.75 STANCHFIELD JULY 2015 Invoice 072815 7/21/2015 Transaction Date 7/2112015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5.75 Refer 42 STILLER, NOEL,.,,=.,, n..... �.,. w,.,,.�,..rv.,.,......,..,�..,e. Cash Payment R 281- 45210 -34737 Villa Slip Revenue REFUND LOST LAKE SLIP FEE- 1/2 SEASON- $1,000.00 N. STILLER Invoice 072815 7116/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ,.�.,d...�..�..�:.,.,�,w..�.. $1,000.00 Refer �� 43 SUMMITCOMPANIES — —, »�„��. —.�.. � ��..o � Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -208 Instructional Supplies FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE - RECHARGE $112.00 3 10# ABC & DRY CHEMICAL Invoice 1072059 6/30/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $112.00 Refer 44 TONKA PLUMBING HEATING & CL _ Cash Payment E 601 -49400 -440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL 3/4" METER & ADAPTERS, REPIPE $204.00 @ 5086 SUNSET RD 6 -22 -15 Invoice 7876 6/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $204.00 Refer 55 TRUE VALUE HWS Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -210 Operating Supplies DOG BISCUITS, NATURAL CLEANER, BOWL $48.04 BRUSH /CADDY, GARBAGE BAGS, TOILET CLEANER Invoice 125604 Cash Payment Invoice 126103 Transaction Date Refer W 6/3/2015 E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies 6/18/2015 7/22/2015 54 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222- 42260 -210 Operating Supplies Invoice 126386 6/29/2015 Transaction Date 7/2212015 Refer 56 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS) Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125535 6/112015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125568 612/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125605 6/3/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125610 6/3/2015 6 YD CLEAR TAPE $15.82 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63.86 15 AMP HIVIS PLUG $5.55 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5.55 16 PK AA BATTERIES $9.99 16 PK AA BATTERIES $17.99 RAID ANT GEL $8.54 ADAPTER SPUTTER, STEREO AUDIO DUBB $7.45 CABLE -1854- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 Cash Payment E 10145200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 125619 6/3/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -221 Equipment Parts Invoice 125664 615/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125813 6110/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -227 Chemicals Invoice 125832 6/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125847 6/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602- 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 125870 6/11/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 126000 6/16/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 126042 6/17/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Refer- .�,.un 57 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PWPKS) Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 126066 6/18/2015 Cash Payment E602-49450-230 Shop Materials Invoice 126069 Cash Payment Invoice 126090 Cash Payment Invoice 126096 Cash Payment 6/18/2015 E 101 - 43100 -230 Shop Materials 6/18/2015 E 101- 45200 -230 Shop Materials 6/18/2015 E 602 - 49450 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 126180 6/22/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 126184 6/22/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -322 Postage Invoice 126056 6118/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -230 Shop Materials Invoice 126274 6/24/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 126321 Cash Payment Invoice 126379 Cash Payment Invoice 126392 Cash Payment 6/26/2015 E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 6/29/2015 E 101 - 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply 6/29/2015 E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 126416 6/3012015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply Invoice 126427 6/30/2015 FORMULA 409, SCREWS, NUTS BOLTS SPRAY NOZZEL, SCREWS, NUTS BOLTS 8 PK AA ALK BATTERIES GAL MURIATIC ACID TRASH BAGS- PARKS CAMERA TRUCK- FLOOR FLANGE PAINTING ACCESS. SEWER DEPT WHT DOVE COVER 10LB SLEDGE HAMMER Wells Fargo 10100 07123/15 9:11 AM Page 11 $14.11 $33.28 $6.49 $61,015.00 $18.69 $14.38 $9.89 $39.59 Total $61,195.40 ENAMEL OIL CLEAR BASE STAIN- 2 GALS, 3 $84.26 PD BRUSH SET RECEPTACLE COVER, DUPLEX 1/2 RISE $8.34 COVER, WELDED SO BOX SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS -ANGLE $17.23 500 PK STAPLES $12.59 ELECTRICAL LIGHT, 9 PK YELLOW WIRE $2.92 CONNECTOR GRAFITTI REMOVER SPRAY $8.99 FED EX SHIPPING EXPENSE- CAMERA TO $244.05 CUES- FLORIDA 16 PK AAA BATTERY $11.69 WHITE BASE BALLON, THINNER, TRAY $99.55 LINER, WHT DOVE COVER EXTERIOR OIL STAIN, 3PC POLY BRUSH SET $78.87 EXTERIOR OIL STAIN, $110.22 3 PK WHT DIVE COVER, 3 PC BILK PEEL V $12.58 TRAY A/R OIL BRIGHT RE D- GAL, KEYS -2 $77.46 -1855- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 12 Total $1,655.59 $164.29 Total $164.29 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 6 -11- 15 THRU 7-10-2015 Invoice 9748764929 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -321 Telephone& Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -321 Telephone& Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 Project 15-3 PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 Project 15-3 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 $35,01 $35.01 $35.01 $17.51 $17.50 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $768.75 I.—I--l"---,—�",----------------------.—,—,----„---.--- Refer 45 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR COMP 46 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPLACE PARKS GARAGE DOOR #5 $1,300.00 Invoice 608254 5126/2015 OPENER W/ PHOTO EYES - RECONNECT Transaction Date Invoice 440565 611712015 PO 24549 Refer, 58 VERIZON WIRELESS Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,300.00 Refer 47 UHL COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-41930-400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC CALL COOLING SYSTEM- CITY HALL 7- $27.00 08-15 ADD REFRIGERANT Invoice 36684 7/912015 Cash Payment E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance SVC CALL COOLING SYSTEM- FIRE DEPT 7- $27.00 08-15 ADD REFRIGERANT Invoice 36684 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 285-46388-440 Other Contractual Servic PARKING RAMP COOLING SYSTEM- SVC- $372,00 CLEAN CONDENSERS, CHANGE FILTERS, REPAIR TSTAT, DISCONNECT 1ST STAGE HEAT WIRE Invoice 36685 7/9/2015 Transaction Date 7/21/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $426.00 Refer 48 ULINE Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts ELECTRICAL LOCKOUT STATION, DRUM $1,006.32 LINERS 5- CT, PARKS Invoice 68472715 6/22/2015 Cash Payment E 101-45200-221 Equipment Parts EXTRA FREIGHT CHARGES- FRUM LINER $18.00 DELIVERY- PARKS Invoice 69070773 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies DRUM LINERS- PARKS GARBAGE BINS $63127 Total $1,655.59 $164.29 Total $164.29 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 6 -11- 15 THRU 7-10-2015 Invoice 9748764929 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -321 Telephone& Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -321 Telephone& Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 Project 15-3 PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 Project 15-3 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 $35,01 $35.01 $35.01 $17.51 $17.50 Invoice 68797755 7/6/2015 Transaction Date 7/2112015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 46 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material KILLZALL 2.5 GAL Invoice 608254 5126/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer, 58 VERIZON WIRELESS Total $1,655.59 $164.29 Total $164.29 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 6 -11- 15 THRU 7-10-2015 Invoice 9748764929 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 101- 42400 -321 Telephone& Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -321 Telephone& Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 Project 15-3 PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 Project 15-3 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 6-11-15 THRU 7-10-2015 $35,01 $35.01 $35.01 $17.51 $17.50 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 222 -42260 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 601 - 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 9748764929 7/10/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Refer �. 50 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 45200 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 602 - 49450 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 601- 49400 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41930 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 222 - 42260 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101- 41910 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 285 - 46388 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 101 - 42115 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 463822862 7/1312015 Transaction Date 7122/2015 Refer- _,,- 49 XCEL ENERGY_- �.,...�,.,�,....w.,,. -_ Cash Payment E 101- 43100 -381 Electric Utilities Invoice 462864154 7/6/2015 Transaction Date 7120/2015 DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY OFFICER 4 -11 -15 THRU 5 -10 -2015 DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #39 RESCUE UTILITY 6 -11 -15 THRU 7 -10 -2015 DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #40 6 -11 -15 THRU 7 -10 -2015 DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 6 -11 -15 THRU 7 -10 -2015 WATER TRUCK #315 DATACARD SVC 6 -11- 15 THRU 7 -10 -2015 WATER TRUCK #512 L. GIESE DATACARD SVC 6 -11 -15 THRU 7 -10 -2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26115 TO 6125/15 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6/25/15 DEPOT BLDG ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6/25/15 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6125115 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6/25/15 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6/25/15 ELECTRIC SVC - 5126/15 TO 6/25/15 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6/25/15 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6125/15 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6/25/15 07123/15 9:11 AM Page 13 $35.01 $35.01 $35.01 $35.01 $35.01 $35.01 $350.10 $167.67 $55.29 $3,188.12 $1,445.48 $3,513.91 $1,845.75 $1,155.40 $1,155.40 $1,051.51 $1,470.97 ELECTRIC SVC - 5/26/15 TO 6/25/15 $42.24 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,091.74 ELECTRIC SVC 6 -03 -15 THRU 7 -2 -15 $4,607.68 MAYWOOD STREET LIGHTS Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,607.68 -1857- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 Fund Summary Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $192,518.67 Total $192,518.67 S 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 14 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $49,022.22 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $34,359.95 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $3,383.90 285 MOUND HRA $3,816.63 601 WATER FUND $76,113.95 602 SEWER FUND $12,905.48 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $12,641.67 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $0.00 $192,243.80 10120 Wells Fargo HRA 101 GENERAL FUND $274.87 $274.87 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $192,518.67 Total $192,518.67 S 07/23/15 9:11 AM Page 14 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 et¢',.+ s145w�..�itiT�";?� "1:1'?'f:q"S." Batch Name 072815HWS User Dollar Amt $115,164.92 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $115,164.92 Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438519107 7/10/2015 E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 438519107 7/10/2015 7/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 394519707 7/16/2015 Invoice 92339300 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 394519707 7/16/2015 Invoice 92378600 7/17/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 460519901 7/18/2015 Invoice 92378000 7/17/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 378519207 7/11/2015 Invoice 92398000 7/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 378519404 7/13/2015 � � �4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 379520106 7/2012015 Invoice 49218600 7117/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Due 12/31/2014 Wells Fargo Refer �.„...., „.,...,..,..,,.� 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY�� Invoice 49218600 7/17/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 3041952 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale Invoice 3043248 7/16/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION $0.00 In Balance 10100 BEER BEER Wells Fargo 10100 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS, C -FOLD TOWELS Invoice 92345100 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Invoice 92345100 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- CORKSCREW Invoice 92345100 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES - 6 PK PERF RINGS Invoice 92339300 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- 3 QT COOLER Invoice 92378600 7/17/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- MN TWINS GLASSES Invoice 92378000 7/17/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX Invoice 92398000 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 � � �4 BELLBOY CORPORATION _Refer Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 49218600 7117/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 49218600 7/17/2015 _1859_ 07/23115 10:09 AM Page 1 $143.43 $1.00 $90.24 $1.00 $75.45 $60.36 $68.13 $212.16 Total $651.77 $348.25 $325.50 Total $673.75 $140.62 $98.90 $36.00 $75.00 $99.00 $21.42 $29.00 Total $499.94 $1,087.00 $17.05 CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1510:09 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: July 2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,581.20 Invoice 49133200 7/1312015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,348.30 Invoice 49122900 7/1012015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $23.25 Invoice 49122900 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,506.04 Invoice 49272700 7/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $74.66 Invoice 49272700 7122/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,637.50 Refer �. 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN w.u,..w... .., « .,, .. ......_ .».�........,�..�.e,..m w...® _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $120.47 Invoice 232382 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $238.29 Invoice 232383 7/15/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $358.76 Refer µH 6 CASTLE DANGER BREWERY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $296.00 Invoice 2691 7/9/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo w 10100 ....,..o,..,,...�.,,.�...... Total $296.00 -M� Refer 7 COCA COLA BOTTLING - MIDWEST ....„..,. .................. w....... Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $282.16 Invoice 0198053410 7/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCT CREDIT - $277.68 Invoice 1445878170 6/28/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4.48 Refer 8 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,883.73 Invoice 1164885 7/15/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,883.73 Refer 9 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY_�� Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,183.42 Invoice 811185 7/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $73.80 Invoice 811186 7/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $319.15 Invoice 811552 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,548.95 Invoice 812182 7/21/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo -. 10100 —, - -.— Total $6,125.32 �— �� , G, - -, — Refer 10 ENKI BREWING COMPANY �_ - -m . -� -- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $236.40 Invoice 4172 7/15/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $236.40 Refer � - -- 11�HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED -" _ -1860- CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1510:09 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: July 2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $719.25 Invoice 772039 7/9/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $719.25 Refer JJ_TA_YLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,494.35 Invoice 2387879 7/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $20.80 Invoice 2361657 7/6/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $16.80 Invoice 2368870 7/1412015 Transaction Date 7/2212015 Wells Fargo »..,,.,.,_. 10100 ......... ......„.,„.„a,�,_..,._,«,...... Total $3,456.75 Refer 14 Jul TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MIN_ N_ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $13.60 Invoice 2387926 7/21/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $93.60 Invoice 2387926 7/21/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,769.15 Invoice 2387925 7/21/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,876.35 Refer 13 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $19.45 Invoice 2387880 7/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $235.20 Invoice 2387880 7/14/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $254.65 Refer 16 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUORW� Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $94.75 Invoice 5211230 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,995.36 Invoice 5211227 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,904.30 Invoice 5211228 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $21.99 Invoice 5211229 7/15/2015 _ Transaction Date 7/2 212 01 5 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,016.40 Refer 15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $138.99 Invoice 5205678 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,460.00 Invoice 5205677 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,453.50 Invoice 5205676 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT - $81.00 Invoice 532783 712/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,594.30 Invoice 5205675 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $112.00 Invoice 5205969 7/9/2015 -1861- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: July 2015 07/23/15 10:09 AM Page 4 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,677.79 Refer 34 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR�� Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $30.25 Invoice 5216622 7122/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,633.73 Invoice 5216619 7/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $6,051.95 Invoice 5216620 7/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $187.98 Invoice 5216621 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,903.91 Refer 17 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7 -02 -15 $333.50 Invoice 30370 7/2/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7 -06 -15 $71.05 Invoice 30375 7/6/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7 -09 -15 $323.35 Invoice 30517 7/912015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7 -13 -15 $58.00 Invoice 30525 7/13/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 �H.,...« n ..........................» Total m.,.,,.. m...-. a. m�,„.. ._.�.»....,ra.,.m,...,,,.,.,.�. $785.90 Refer 39 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA_. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -433 Dues and Subscriptions JULY 2015 TO JULY 2016 MN MUNICIPAL $1,585.00 BEVERAGE ASSOC ANNUAL DUES- HWS Invoice 072815 7/2312015 Transaction Date 7/2312015 �. �..., �, �,, ....��.,.,�.,.v�,.,o��,�..��V Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,585.00 Refer 18 PARLEY LAKE WINERY, Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $240.00 Invoice 15073 7/16/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 o..«.,.,., a.»,...,...,..,.,.,. Total u.....,..«..,..,....,. m„, ,,..,,W.,.,...a,...�..,.�... $240.00 Refer 19 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA�.,.,..,»....,.,,,.. Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $623.16 Invoice 8506729 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 8506729 7/13/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $428.85 Invoice 8507604 7/20/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $7.00 Invoice 8507604 7/20/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 - -- Total �,.�„ — ..�..,w..- ,�.......- .a...,..- $1,071.51 Refer — 20 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC �— Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $953.75 Invoice 2820271 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $275.35 Invoice 2820270 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $144.00 Invoice 2820272 7/15/2015 -1862- CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1510:09 AM Page 5 Payments Current Period: July 2015 Refer 23 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ -1863- Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $477,50 Invoice 2823813 7/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,861.95 Invoice 2823812 7/2212015 Transaction Date 712212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total M�...a $6,712.55 Refer 21 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $921.00 Invoice 2816656 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $401.60 Invoice 2816657 71812015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $41.95 Invoice 2816658 7/812015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR - $119.50 Invoice 215591 6/25/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,245.05 Refer X22 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,886.00 Invoice 1304164 71912015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,796.35 Invoice 1304165 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT - $112.44 Invoice 9060386 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,353.50 Invoice 1306595 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,335.59 Invoice 1306596 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$3.00 Invoice 9060761 7/13/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,256.00 Refer 35 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rasa MIX $38.87 Invoice 1308933 7/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,000.00 Invoice 1308934 7/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $747.28 Invoice 1308932 7/2312015 Transaction Date 7123/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,786.15 Refer 25 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,154.05 Invoice 905960 7114/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $34.30 Invoice 905957 7/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $30.00 Invoice 905957 7/14/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,258.25 Invoice 908591 7/23/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,476.60 Refer 23 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ -1863- CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1510:09 AM Page 6 Payments Current Period: July 2015 1J aaCIR'?� a1' :3«$Wi'z via 'S,4+M E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale 11"u�i Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,135.17 Invoice 907528 7/21/2015 E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $10170 Invoice 907530 7/21/2015 E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa SODA $200.00 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $25.10 Invoice 907529 7/21/2015 FREIGHT $14.00 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $756.00 Invoice 907249 7/17/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $587.88 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,019.97 Refer 24 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,667.05 Invoice 906922 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $673.00 Invoice 905604 7/10/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $280.00 Invoice 905518 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $940.80 Invoice 899729 6111/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 �.......-.._,..-» �,...,.., w., ��..,, �..r., �. �. m.._. m.. �,.,, Total $3,560.85 w,.. R.. ...�m.,�.,.».�.,M»..�,....,,�.. Refer 26 VINOCOP /A, INCORPORATED_ ... Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $144.00 Invoice 0128797 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0128797 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $96.00 Invoice 0128795 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0128795 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $106.00 Invoice 0128796 7116/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0128796 7/16/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35150 Refer 27 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $371.38 Invoice 0128351 718/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0128351 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa SODA $200.00 Invoice 0128350 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $14.00 Invoice 0128350 7/8/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $587.88 Refer 36 WEBLEASE USA Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -440 Other Contractual Servic MONTHLY WEBSITE SVC 7 -15 -15 THRU 8 -14- $99.00 15 HWS Invoice 67036 7115/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fat 10100 Total $99.00 W...,..rom. CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1510:09 AM Page 7 Payments Current Period: July 2015 Invoice 1080348008 7/16/2015 -1865- Refer 28 WINE COMPANY _ _ Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $684.00 Invoice 398049 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $13.20 Invoice 398049 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $184.00 Invoice 398661 7/16/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -265 Freight FREIGHT $6.30 Invoice 398661 7/16/2015 Transaction Date 7/2212015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $887.50 Refer WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $525.00 Invoice 7037848 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $773.00 Invoice 7037847 718/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $432.00 Invoice 7038806 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,829.94 Invoice 7039692 7122/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,559.94 Refer ...� 30 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER _ Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $69.30 Invoice 1090435670 7115/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $348.00 Invoice 1090435781 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,842.00 Invoice 1090435688 7/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT - $19.80 Invoice 1090435669 7/15/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,239.50 Refer � 31 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,410.50 Invoice 1090432302 7/812015 Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $80.00 Invoice 1090432304 7/8/2015 Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $574.00 Invoice 1090432303 7/8/2015 _ Transaction Date 7 /2 212 01 5 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,064.50 Refer X37 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN BEER_ Cash Payment E 609 -49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $23.10 Invoice 1090439337 7/22/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,091.85 Invoice 1090439336 7/22/2015 Transaction Date 7/2 312 01 5 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,114.95 Refer 33 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SP_ IRA Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $924.00 Invoice 1080348008 7/16/2015 -1865- CITY OF MOUND 07/23/1510:09 AM Page 8 Payments Current Period: July 2015 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $115,164.92 $115,164.92 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $115,164.92 Total $115,164.92 S.• Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,156.12 Invoice 1080348007 7/16/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,080.12 32 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRT _Refer Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $770.00 Invoice 1080345461 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,917.65 Invoice 1080345459 7/9/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Resa MIX $34.24 Invoice 1080345460 7/9/2015 Transaction Date 7/22/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,721.89 Refer38 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MN WINE SPIRf��W Cash Payment E 609- 49750 -253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,736.00 Invoice 1080351216 7/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,673.57 Invoice 1080351215 7/23/2015 Cash Payment E 609 - 49750 -254 Soft Drinks /Mix For Rosa MIX $34.24 Invoice 1080351217 7/23/2015 Transaction Date 7/23/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,443.81 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $115,164.92 $115,164.92 Pre - Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $115,164.92 Total $115,164.92 S.• MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 14, 2015 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, July 14, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Heidi Gesch, Ray Salazar, Kelli Gillispie, and Jennifer Peterson, Tim Olson Members absent: None. Others present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, Director of Finance /Clerk/Treasurer Catherine Pausche, Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten, Director of Community Development Sarah Smith, Attorney Melissa Manderschied, Katie Morford, Justin Rock, Laura Mattioli, Robert Mattioli, Mark Saliterman, Beth Saliterman, Pete Hamlin, Mary McKinley, John McKinley, Kris Williams, Russ Bothern, Tom Lundquist, Rod Pettit, Tim Litfin, Brian Nelson, Scott Beckman, Dan Swanson, Al Leach, Kathy Leach, Kraig Kuck, Darren Neuman. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Hanson asked for the wording on Consent Agenda Items 4J and 4K be restated to say "Approve a" and not "Action on a Resolution Approving." MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $1,409,478.36 B. Approve minutes: June 23, 2015 regular meeting C. Approve Pay Request No. 3 from Geislinger & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $457,973.51 for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements - West Three Points Blvd. Utilities, City Project No. PW -14 -01 D. Approve Pay Request No. 5 from GMH Asphalt in the amount of $170,500.11 for the 2014 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements - East Three Points Boulevard, City Project No. PW -14 -01 E. Approve Pay Request No. 1 from Geislinger & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $150,654.80 for the 2015 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvements - Grandview Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard, City Project Nos. PW -15 -02 and PW -15 -01 -1867- Mound City Council Minutes — July 14, 2015 F. Approve Payment of Invoice from Precision Seal Coating in the amount of $6,187.50 for the 2015 Crack Seal Project, City Project No. PW -15 -07 G. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -73: RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2015 SEAL COAT PROJECT TO ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,148.00, CITY PROJECT NO. PW -15 -08 H. Approve Policy FIN -003 Procurement Policy 1. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -74: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ELIMINATION OF PARCELS FROM TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 -2 WITHIN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 1 OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVE A PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT FOR 2015 FULL THROTTLE FISHING TOURNAMENT SPECIAL EVENT AT CENTERVIEW PARK AND BEACH K. APPROVE A PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT FOR 2015 RIVER VALLEY CHURCH PICNIC AT SURFSIDE PARK & BEACH L. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -75: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT FOR BOY SCOUT TROOP NO. 569 - FLAG RETIREMENT CEREMONY SPECIAL EVENT AT THE HARBOR DISTRICT WITH FEES WAIVED M. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -76: RESOLUTION APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR THE LANDINGS ON LOST LAKE 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. Pete Hamlin, 6370 Bay Ridge Road, stated that approximately two weeks ago a moving truck snagged the overhead lines at 1 pm on a Thursday and that the line was not repaired until 11 am the next day. Hamlin stated 14 homes could not either access or leave their home via auto and that the mail and garbage services were suspended. Hamlin offered the following remarks and suggestions for the Council's consideration: (1) County Roads require a minimum height of 19 feet between wires and the street and the City should evaluate low hanging wires and pass something similar. (2) Homeowners were left to determine the owner of the wire which was thought to be Mediacom but was actually Frontier. Hamlin suggested the City take responsibility to ensure the repair is properly prioritized by the responsible agency. (3) Hamlin said the wire was cordoned off by yellow police tape but that the wire was not live and did not pose a threat. Hamlin suggested use of cones to direct traffic if necessary, but to allow access to homes by auto. Hamlin said not only for public safety considerations, but also for the convenience of residents who were affected. John McKinley, 5948 Hillcrest Road, stated Hillcrest was on the 2008 street improvement project for the portion west of Sycamore to Grandview Boulevard and was part of the 2013 sealcoat project. McKinley said with all the construction traffic damage has resulted with cracks 1 - 2 inches wide, curb to curb. McKinley said there are options to use other routes for streets that have not been improved and asked for the City to divert construction traffic and repair the cracks to prevent further damage. Eric Hoversten, Public Works Director, stated that the timing did not allow for Hillcrest to be included in the 2015 crack repair project, but that Staff is aware of that and it is a priority. Hoversten said a single repair job will cost more and that the City does not have the equipment to do it. Mayor Wegscheid asked if it makes sense to wait until the construction is Mound City Council Minutes — July 14, 2015 done and Hoversten replied yes. Salazar asked if it would be done as part of the 2016 project and Hoversten said yes. Hoversten added that it had been the intention to add the crack repair project as an alternate /change order for 2015 but that the contractor's schedule was unable to accommodate the work. Mary McKinely, 5948 Hillcrest, noted that concerns were raised both last year and this year and were told Superintendent Ray Hanson would be responding but he never did. She was also told Staff was too busy with high water events and that repairs were not in the budget. McKinley said Hoversten confirmed damage and that she is questioning why construction traffic would be allowed on new roads. John McKinley, 5948 Hillcrest, suggested the City post a "NO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES" sign as other cities have done on some of their roads. 6. Visit and presentation by Tim Litfin regarding 2015 Tour de Tonka annual special event Litfin showed a video and Power Point presentation showing highlights from last year's race, the planned routes for the August 1, 2015 ride, and thanked the City for its support of the event. 7. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, requesting review of street vacation application for north 1/2 of unimproved portion of Galway Road abutting property at 4730 Galway Road and consideration /action on variance application for lack of minimum required frontage on improved road Planning Case No. 15 -09 and 15 -10 Applicant: Justin Rock Smith showed a diagram of the property and gave background on previous events, including the purchase and granting of a public lands permit and variance to allow the building footprint to encroach on the front set -back. Smith stated conditions contained in the variance and public lands permit included an agreement to address the improvements and protect the City's interests and that those actions still stand. Smith said the Council denied a request for a full vacation of the 30 feet of unimproved portion of Galway Lane submitted by Rock and his neighbor, the Mullers. Smith noted that the vacation process required notifications to the DNR and that the DNR recommended denial because the public was using it as access to the commons and Lake Minnetonka. Smith said that following the denial, Mr. Rock submitted a new application to vacate the north portion of Galway Lane (partial vacation) and a new variance application to address one condition regarding the minimum required frontage. If the new variance is approved, the setback variance would no longer be required. Smith noted MSS 412.851 requirements were conducted including notifying the DNR, as well as the publication, posting, and mailing of the public hearing notices. Staff recommended approval as frontage on an improved road and elimination of one of the two variances were deemed favorable as Mr. Rock will have fee title rights to the middle of the road, noting that the City will still holds an easement. Staff noted the ability to have a conforming house is favorable and the fact that the south portion of Galway Lane would still be available for public access. Smith noted the Docks and Commons Commission recommended approval and that the Planning Commission recommended denial of both requests as they felt there was public benefit to retaining right of way and they thought the existing approvals were sufficient. Smith noted the -1869- Mound City Council Minutes — July 14, 2015 Planning Commission minutes were included in the packet that contain testimony from the area neighbors and that there was also a letter from the neighbors on the south side that was received earlier in the day and distributed as additional information. Smith noted if the vacation was approved, Galway Road would be considered the front of the building. All setbacks would be relative to that change and orientation and setbacks would change accordingly. Smith noted applicant did some staking and there are more pictures to share. Mayor Wegscheid asked for the statutory requirement for vacations. Smith read an excerpt from statute stating that no vacation shall be made unless it appears in the public's interest to do so and a public hearing is conducted. Smith noted this case does not have a qualified petition approved by a majority of the property owners, so it requires a 4 /51" vote for the vacation and a simple majority for the variance. Gesch asked to clarify what the markers meant. Gesch also asked to clarify that with the new request for the vacation the building pad increased from 3,000 to 3,700 SF and that the plan as presented has shifted location of the building closer to the south property line. Smith said yes. Mayor Wegscheid opened the public hearing at 7:50pm. Justin Rock, 4730 Galway Road, applicant, said he regrouped with staff when the original full vacation request was denied by the City Council. Rock said his objective is to gain width on the lot by making the house wider toward the lake and that lot orientation is his biggest concern. Rock said if this is not approved, he wants to dispute the ruling on the orientation and corresponding set - backs. Rock would like to see the west side considered the front, east side the rear and north and south the side lot lines. Rock said the driveway will already hinder public access to the road and that the south side is the flatter area and that he feels 15 feet would be adequate for access. Rock noted the grade increases significantly on north side which also lessens the ability for public use. Mayor Wegscheid asked for the conditions on the driveway. Smith said it had to be on the north half only and it had to be minimal impact on the right of way as well as the footprint behind the 20 foot setback. Darren Neuman, DNR representative, thanked the Council for the opportunity to provide comments and for the access the city provides to Lake Minnetonka. Neuman reiterated the requirements for vacation and the need for public benefit to do so per MSS 412.851. Neuman said the benefits in favor of vacation need to be weighed against the benefits of retaining the access and noted that it is not just boating /access to the commons, but other uses such as fishing and snowmobile access during the winter. Neuman stated the 1913 road dedication was to the public use forever and for 100 years has provided public access to the commons. Neuman cautioned about assuming the remaining 15 feet is sufficient based on current uses without knowing the potential future uses. Kathy Leach, 2645 Shannon Lane, said she can't see how vacating is in the interest of the public, as it only appears to be in the interest of one property owner. If this vacation is granted, Leach assumes the Mullers would apply and wonders how the Council could grant to one and not to the other. Leach highlighted the building pad increase with the new request and noted that plans and other requests continue to shift. 1$70- Mound City Council Minutes — July 14, 2015 Alan Leach, 2645 Shannon Lane, said there are three access points to Excelsior Commons but this one is used the most because the grade is steep on one and the grade of the other results in poor conditions and flooding. Leach says users intentionally use the middle to respect the privacy of the Muller's. Leach said retaining city access is important for public safety and maintenance like dredging and tree removal. Leach said Rock and his associates have been driving large vehicles and trailers on the unimproved road, changing the nature of the area disturbing the peaceful nature. Dan Swanson, 2560 Wexford Lane, said he is a non - abutting site holder who has lived in Mound for over 18 years and uses the right of way during all seasons. Swanson noted that concerns were raised when the lot was sold for development and his fears are being realized. Brian Nelson, 2620 Tyrone Lane, said dump trucks used the right of way for access to do a dredge in the past and that won't be possible in the future. Nelson said losing the 15 feet of the public access would prevent the use of ATVs and access by maintenance vehicles as the north side of the access provides the flatter area toward the commons. Scott Beckman, 2628 Tyrone Lane, said he is a non - abutting site holder who has lived in Mound for over 15 years and that he and his daughter fish on their dock 3 — 4 times a week and use the right of way to access it. Beckman noted the applicant bought the lot knowing what the layout was. Rod Pettit, 2647 Shannon Lane, said he uses the access in all seasons and questions why it is taking this long to make a decision as the dedication of the access is permanent. Laura Mattioli, 4730 Galway Road, stated that she wanted to remind the City that they were coached by the City Attorney and Staff to take this route. Mattioli stated that they just want the orientation changed because the 70 foot lot is only 35 feet buildable and that the corner lot was not considered. Mattioli said they are not trying to be greedy or upset people, but that they just want the same orientation /set -backs that everyone else got. Mayor Wegscheid said everyone can respect an individual's desire to make their property what they want. Tim Olson, owner of 2647 Shannon Lane, highlighted that the original dedication was permanent. Olson questioned the decision to allow the sellers who split the lot to retain abutting status on a non- abutting property. Olson said although the applicant said he moved the house further from the Mullers in this round, it was only 6 inches while he increased it 14 feet on the other side. Olson said granting approval would be a detriment to him as a landlord because the current access to the Lake increases the value of his property. Mayor Wegscheid closed the public hearing at 8:20pm. Mayor Wegscheid said he keeps returning to the state statute and the public good test and feels there is an obvious public benefit to not vacating. Salazar concurred with that statement and said the original dedication was maintained for over 100 years and feels the original resolutions approved on 10/28/14 should stand. Gillispie asked why Staff chose the orientation they did and Smith said the planning report included an explanation of the interpretation. Smith said that due to the time constraints for the closing, Staff recommended the public lands and variance option at that time, but understood that the applicant may eventually pursue a vacation application which takes more time. -1871- Mound City Council Minutes — July 14, 2015 Mayor Wegscheid noted that each vacation stands on its own, but it is hard to anticipate denying the vacation application on the south side if the north was vacated. Smith said a resolution was not prepared in advance and the requested action is to direct staff to bring back a resolution regarding the vacation and variance. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to direct staff to prepare a resolution denying the vacation of Galway Lane citing the findings presented in the packet and coupled with the testimony provided at the meeting tonight. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Wegscheid commented neighborhoods are an important thing and he hopes that the neighborhood will put this aside and move on. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to remove the variance application from consideration on the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. l� Smith gave background on the project and stated they were looking for direction from the Council as to whether the City is willing to share in the legal fees. Smith summarized the options provided in the packet. Mayor Wegscheid said he was leaning toward option number one. Gillispie agreed as the Limited Use Agreement template could be used at other locations. Gesch questioned whether a cap should be placed on the amount of legal fees the City would pay for but it was agreed that the legal work was essentially complete. Hanson asked if the title work will be relevant during future development and Attorney Manderschied stated yes but said it was also a point in time analysis. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to direct staff to amend the Limited Use Agreement to reflect option one where the City will pay for legal fees related to the creation of the Limited Use Agreement. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Hoversten stated that the requirements of the new FIN -003 Procurement Policy require change orders over 10% of the contract amount to be brought back to the Council and that is why this item was not on the consent agenda. Hoversten said the favorable bid results allowed for an increase in scope for pipe lining and that the net increase will be approximately $40,000, which is within the statutory guidelines for not having to rebid. Hoversten said Met Council is changing its measurement of exceeding the limits of Inflow & Infiltration (W) and that it will now be based on hourly flows versus the average over a 24 hour period. Hoversten stated Met Council will reduce any penalty amount for overages by the amount invested in pipe lining so this is money well spent. Attorney Manderschied clarified the 25% cap on having to rebid relates to Chapter 429 special assessment projects and not utility projects and that the change order route was chosen because of the similar scope of work as the contract that was bid. The other project that is -1872- Mound City Council Minutes — July 14, 2015 being bid is small enough to allow for use of the quote process. Salazar said he likes the idea of paying for investments versus penalties. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 15 -77: RESOLUTION APPROVING EXTRA WORK ORDER NO. 1, 201412015 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT - CITY PROJECT NOS. PW- 14-05, PW -15 -06 10. Peterson said a meeting with Three Rivers and Hennepin County was organized to discuss Dakota Regional Trail safety at the Shoreline Drive crossing. Hanson stated changes were made years ago in an attempt to improve safety, but concerns still exist. The modifications at that time targeted the trail users but now short, near and long term solutions were discussed to target motor vehicle driver behavior. Hanson noted trail crossing are different from pedestrian crossings and vehicle traffic is not supposed to stop at trail crossings. Hanson said tonight's broadcast is the first opportunity to educate the public, and articles in the paper and newsletter will also address rules of the road for drivers and trail users. Hanson read the language provided by Three Rivers that was included in the packet. Hanson also highlighted the other solutions and options to educate in the near -term and long- term. Mayor Wegscheid said he is happy the conversation has begun. Salazar said he would like education for bicyclers to warn them cars will not stop but that he does not like the idea of narrowing the road to two lanes as that would cause other problems. 11. Hoversten said the city was given the opportunity to comment on the MCWD CIP and project list and said they are divided between Focus and Response Tracks. Hoversten said that although none of the projects are in Mound, there are opportunities to collaborate with the Response Track funds that were increased from $500,000 to $1,000,000 and may be available to help with things dike repairing the Wolner Field parking lot or maintaining the Lost Lake Channel. Hoversten requested any specific feedback be forwarded to him and recommended the City input be to concur with the plan but with the comment that the City would like to hold open the opportunity to propose projects or set requirements that are relevant to projects in Mound. MOTION by Wegscheid, seconded by Salazar, to provide input on the MCWD CIP for 2016 - 2018 as Staff has suggested. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 12. Information /Miscellaneous A. Comments /reports from Council members /City Manager Hanson said the Spirit of the Lakes Festival is July 16, 17 and 18th and that buttons and T -shirts are available at Walgreens, Jubilee and Mound True Value. Hanson said the Thursday night kick -off begins at 5pm. B. Minutes: C. Reports: Harbor Wine & Spirits: June 2015 D. Correspondence: Orono Public Safety Open House: July 11, 2015 Mound City Council Minutes —July 14, 2015 13. Adiourn MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Gesch, to adjourn at 9:01 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1874- Mayor Mark Wegscheid a crt-t�cSFMOUra� PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE c�ry �e t�avNta PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY (Al 20125) WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 115A.552, Counties shall ensure that residents have an opportunity to recycle; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires that each city implement and maintain a recycling program; and WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board adopted a resolution to amend the Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy to incorporate requirements to expend additional SCORE funds on organics recycling, and extend the contract period of the residential Recycling Funding Policy from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS, in order to receive grant funds, the City must sign the agreement; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to receive these grant funds each year. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound hereby approves Amendment 1 to Residential Recycling Grant Agreement (Amendment 1 to Contract No. A120125) which shall extend the term for one year and require the same annual reporting for that additional year as contained in Exhibit A and made a part herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council Authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute such Residential Recycling Grant Agreement with the County. Adopted by the City Council this 28TH day of July, 2015 Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid -1877- AMENDMENT NO. i TO AGREEMENT A120125 This Agreement is between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, A -2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 ( "COUNTY "), on behalf of the Hennepin County Environment and Energy Department, 701 Fourth Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 -1600 ( "DEPARTMENT ") and the CITY OF MOUND, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 -1687 ( "CITY "). WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY entered into a four -year Residential Recycling Grant Agreement, Contract No. A120125 ( "Agreement "), for a residential recycling grant commencing on January 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, the County Board, by Resolution No. 15 -0216 adopted on June 16, 2015, amended the Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy to incorporate requirements to expend additional SCORE funds on organics recycling, extended the period from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016, and authorized grant funding for municipal recycling programs consistent with said policy; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term and incorporate other changes; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that Agreement A120125 is amended as follows: Paragraph a. of Section 1, TERM AND COST OF THE AGREEMENT, shall be amended to read as follows: This Agreement shall commence upon execution and terminate on December 31, 2016. 2. Section 2, SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED, shall be amended to read as follows: The CITY shall operate its recycling program in accordance with the requirements described in the County's Residential Recycling Funding Policy ( "Policy "), attached as Attachment A and incorporated by this reference, and fulfill the responsibilities of the Policy. 3. Section 3, METHOD OF PAYMENT, shall be amended to read as follows: The COUNTY will distribute SCORE funds as described in the Policy. The CITY shall follow the requirements for use of funds described in the Policy. Except as amended, the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Reviewed by the County Attorney's COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Office STATE OF MINNESOTA LIN Assistant County Attorney Chair of Its County Board Date: Recommended for Approval Director, Environment and Energy Department ATTEST: am Deputy /Clerk of County Board David Hough, County Administrator Date: am Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: MUNICIPALITY CITY warrants that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of CITY as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.* Printed Signed: Title: *CONTRACTOR shall submit applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the time CONTRACTOR returns the Agreement to the COUNTY. Documentation is not required for a sole prourietorship. -1879- ■ Public Works Environment and Energy Department Adopted November 29, 20111 VNI-Sed June 16, 2015 'l 1 # The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners determined that curbside collection of recyclables from Hennepin County residents is an effective strategy to reduce reliance on landfills, prevent pollution, reduce the toxicity of waste, conserve natural resources and energy, improve public health, support the economy, and reduce greenhouse gases. Therefore, the county adopted the goals established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in its Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan and developed a Residential Recycling Funding Policy to help reach a 75% recycling rate by 2030. The county will distribute all Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE) funds received from the state to cities for curbside collection of residential recyclables, including organics. If cities form a joints powers organization responsible for managing a comprehensive recycling and waste education system for the residents of those cities, the county will distribute a recycling grant to that organization. Cities are expected to fulfill the conditions of the policy. Length of Residential Recycling Funding Policy Hennepin County is committed to implement this policy and continue distributing all SCORE funds received from the state for the purpose of funding curbside residential recycling programs from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2016. The county may revise this policy if it determines changes are needed to assure compliance with state law and MPCA goals established for metropolitan counties. In the event that SCORE funds are eliminated from the state budget or significantly reduced, the county will consult with cities to develop a subsequent recommendation for the county board that will continue this policy and fund curbside recycling programs. Fund Distribution The county will distribute to the cities one hundred percent (100 %) of SCORE funds that the county receives from the state. SCORE funds are based on revenue collected by the State of Minnesota from the solid waste management (SWM) tax on garbage services. SCORE funds are subject to change based on actual S WM revenue and the funds allocated by the State Legislature. Funds distributed to cities for the current calendar year will be based on SCORE funds received by the county in the state's corresponding fiscal year. In 2014 the State Legislature allocated additional funds to SCORE in 2015 and 2016. Beginning in fiscal year 2015 and continuing thereafter, of any money distributed that exceeds the amount the county received in fiscal year 2014, 50 percent must be expended on organics recycling. :: UUMM Allocation of Funds The following formula will be utilized to determine each city's recycling SCORE grant each year. # of households with curbside recycling in city X Total SCORE funds _ Recycling grant amount --------------------------- - - - - -- available for available to the city Total # of households with recycling curbside recycling in county Eligible households are defined as single family through eight -plex residential buildings or other residential buildings where each housing unit sets out refuse and recycling containers for curbside collection. The cities will determine the number of eligible households by counting the number of households with curbside recycling service on January 1 of each funding year. The number will be reported in the application for funding. The total SCORE grant available for recycling will equal the 2014 base year amount plus 50 percent of additional SCORE funds. If the total SCORE funds are less than the 2014 base year, 100 percent of those funds will be available for recycling. The grant can be used for recycling program expenses including capital and operating costs. Expenses associated with residential collection of organics are eligible recycling program expenses. However, yard waste expenses are ineligible. If organics and yard waste are commingled, the organics expenses must be tracked separately. Responsibilities of Cites A. Grant Agreement Each city seeking funding under the terms of the Residential Recycling Funding Policy must enter into a Residential Recycling Grant Agreement with the county for a term concurrent with the expiration of this policy, December 31, 2016. The grant agreement must be accompanied by a resolution authorizing the city to enter into such an agreement. B. Application for Funding Each city must complete an annual application by February 15 to receive funding for that year. The application consists of the Re -TRAC web -based report and a planning document submitted to the county describing the programs or activities the applicant will implement to increase recycling and make progress toward recycling goals. C. Minimum Program Performance Requirements no 1. Collection of Recvclables. Cities that contract for curbside recycling services will require a breakout of the following expenses when renewing or soliciting bids for new recycling services: a) containers — if provided by the hauler b) collection service c) processing cost per ton d) revenue sharing 2. Materials to be Collected. At a minimum, the following materials must be collected curbside: a) Newspaper and inserts; b) Cardboard boxes; c) Glass food and beverage containers; d) Metal food and beverage cans; e) All plastic containers and lids, #I — Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET, PETE), #2 High Density Polyethylene (HDPE), #3 — Vinyl Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), #4 — Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) and #5 — Polypropylene (PP) plastic bottles, except those that previously contained hazardous materials or motor oil; f) Magazines and catalogs; g) Cereal, cracker, pasta, cake mix, shoe, gift, and electronics boxes; h) Boxes from toothpaste, medications and other toiletries; i) Aseptic and gable- topped containers; and j) Mail, office and school papers. The county may add materials to this list and require cities to begin collection within one year of receiving notification from the county. Cities will notify the county if materials not found on this list will be collected. 3. Collection Methods. Cities must use one of the following systems to collect materials at the curb: a) single sort system - all materials combined in one container; or b) dual sort system - glass, metal and plastic together with paper separate If one of these two systems is not in place, the city must submit a plan with its application for converting to a single or dual sort system by December 31, 2016. If the municipality is unable to meet this deadline, an alternative implementation schedule must be negotiated with the county. 4. Education and Outreach. a) County Responsibilities 1) Coordinate meetings of the communications committee, which will be composed of county, cities, and other stakeholders. 2) Produce education material templates and print the template materials for cities. Materials will also be available online to download. 3) Provide a minimum of eight promotional resources that will include a newsletter article, a web story, social media posts, and printed promotional materials for municipalities on a variety of waste reduction, reuse, recycling, and proper disposal messages. 4) Develop an annual priority message campaign. The campaign will be one main message to promote throughout the year; for example "recycle magazines." The message and the materials will be developed with the communications committee. The county will provide templates and be responsible for primary distribution of the campaign through direct mail, advertising, or public relations. The cities will be required to support the campaign through their communication channels. b) City Requirements 1) Use county terminology when describing recycling guidelines (i.e. description of materials accepted and not accepted, preparation guidelines, etc.). 2) Use images provided by the county or the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board, if using images of recyclables. 3) Use the county's terminology, preparation guidelines and images on the city's website. 4) Mail a recycling guide once a year to residents using a template developed by the communications committee and produced and printed by the county at the county's expense. If a municipality does not want to use the template produced by the county, the municipality may develop its own guide at the municipality's expense, with prior approval by the county. If the city relies on its hauler to provide the recycling guide, this guide would also require approval by the county. 5) Complete two additional education activities from a menu of options developed by the communications committee to support the priority message campaign. Any print material that communicates residential recycling guidelines that were not provided by the county template will require county approval. This does not apply to waste reduction and reuse, articles on recycling that do not include guidelines, and social media posts. The county will respond within five business days to any communication piece submitted. 5. Use of Funds. a) The city must use all grant funds for waste reduction and recycling capital and operating expenses in the year granted. Cities will not be reimbursed any funds in excess of actual expenses. b) The city may not charge its residents through property tax, utility fees or any other method for that portion of the costs of its recycling program funded by county grant funds. c) The city must establish a separate accounting mechanism, such as a project number, activity number, or fund that will separate recycling revenues and expenditures from other municipal activities, including solid waste and yard waste activities. d) Recycling and waste reduction activities, revenues, and expenditures are subject to audit. e) Cites that do not contract for curbside recycling services will receive grant funds provided that at least ninety percent (90 %) of the grant funds are credited back to residents and the city meets all minimum program requirements. The additional ten percent (10 %) may be used for administrative and promotional expenses. 6. Reporting Requirements. a) Each city must submit an annual recycling report to the county electronically using the Re -TRAC web -based reporting system by February 15 of each year. If a city is unable to access Re -TRAC, the county must be contacted by February 1 to make arrangements for alternative filing of the report. b) Each city must calculate its participation rate in the curbside recycling program during the month of October. The participation rate will be reported in Re -TRAC. The methodology for measuring participation must be provided to the county upon request. c) Each city must submit an annual planning document to the county describing the programs or activities the applicant will implement to increase recycling and make progress toward county goals. Recycling Performance. On an annual basis, each city must demonstrate a reasonable effort to maintain and increase the average amount of recyclables collected from its residential recycling program to at least 725 pounds per household or a minimum recovery rate of 80 %, by December 31, 2015. The goal remains the same for December 31, 2016. An alternative performance option for cities with organized waste collection is to validate at least a 35% recycling rate. To ensure the accuracy of data for these metrics, cities will be required, upon request, to provide documentation on the methodology used to calculate performance. To the extent practicable, the results should rely on actual data rather than estimates. Failure by a city to demonstrate measureable progress toward goals will result in the city being required to submit a recycling improvement plan within 90 days of being notified by the county. The recycling improvement plan must be negotiated with the county and specify the efforts that will be undertaken to yield the results necessary to achieve the goals. The plan shall focus on the following areas: type of container, sort method, materials collected, 5 frequency of collection, education and outreach, performance measurement, and incentives. Funding will be withheld until the city's recycling improvement plan is approved by the county. In cooperation with the county, the city may be required to participate in waste and recycling sorts to identify recovery levels of various recyclables in their communities. Based on the results of the study, the county and city will collaborate to increase the recovery of select recyclable materials being discarded in significant quantities. D. Partnership The partnership between the county and cities has been highly effective in educating and motivating behavior of residents resulting in significant amounts of waste being reduced and recycled. In order to continue this partnership and increase these efforts, program activities of cities must be coordinated with county and regional efforts. Cites are responsible for cooperating with the county in an effort to reach the county's goals for recycling and organics recovery. Quarterly recycling coordinator meetings are an opportunity to share resources and facilitate the coordination of efforts. Responsibilities of Hennepin County A. Application Form The county will provide an application form by December that each city will use to report on its recycling program and request grant funding for the next year. D. Payments The county will make grant payments to each city in two equal payments. One payment will be made after the county receives the application, which will consist of the Re -TRAC report and the planning document. A second payment will be made after the report has been approved, measurable progress toward the goals has been confirmed, and, if necessary, a recycling improvement plan has been approved by the county. If the city meets the county requirements, both payments will be made during the same calendar year. no Allocation of Funds The following formula will be used to determine a city's organics grant each year. Number of households with curbside organics in city Total SCORE funds Organics grant ----- ---------------------- - - - - -- x available for = amount available to Total number of households with organics the city curbside organics in county The total SCORE funds available for organics recycling will equal 50 percent of the additional SCORE revenue allocated by the State Legislature. If the total SCORE funding is less than the 2014 base year, no funds will be available for organics recycling. Application for Funds To apply for funds, a city must submit the number of eligible households that signed up for organics to the county by September 1 of each funding year. The grant funds may be used for organics program expenses, including the following: a Contract cost of service (to the city or its residents) • Discount to new customers • Carts • Compostable bags • Kitchen containers • Education and outreach Program administration is an ineligible expense. Yard waste expenses are ineligible expenses. If organics and yard waste are collected together, the organics expenses must be tracked separately. If the city passes funds through to a hauler, 100% of those funds must be credited to households' bills. In addition, the following requirements apply: • All grant funds must be used during the term of the agreement. Funds not spent must be returned to the county. • Funds must be expended on eligible activities per Minnesota State Statute 115A.557. • A city may not charge its residents through property tax, utility fees or any other method for that portion of the costs of its organics program funded by county grant funds. • Cities must able to account for organics expenditures separately upon request by the county. Expenditures are subject to audit. 7 Education and Outreach The partnership between the county and cities has been highly effective in educating and motivating the behavior of residents, resulting in significant amounts of waste being reduced and recycled. In order to continue this partnership with organics recycling, the county encourages cities to coordinate program activities with county and regional efforts. The county will work with cities to provide assistance with the following: • Standard terminology and images • Organics recycling guide (yes -no list) • Promotional resources to increase participation Reporting A report on the city's organics program must be submitted electronically to the county by February 15 following each funding year. The report must include, but is not limited to, the following: Basic Program Information: • Hauler • Collection method • Where organics are delivered to and processed at • Is service opt -in or opt -out • Cost of service to residents and contract cost to the city • How the service is billed • Items included in service: curbside collection, cart, compostable bags, etc. Results • Tons • Number of households signed up • Average pounds per household per year • Participation (set -out rate on pickup day) • How funds were used IN Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Comm. Development Director DATE: July 22, 2015 RE: Mound Westonka Rotary Club Project in the Mound Harbor District Background. At its May 12th meeting, the City Council adopted a Resolution which approved the Public Lands Permit for the Phase 2 improvements in the Harbor District subject to conditions, including, but not limited to, the approval and execution of the Limited Use Agreement ( "Agreement ") related to the beautification project in the Harbor District in downtown Mound that was undertaken by the Mound Westonka Rotary Club ( "Rotary "). At its June 23rd meeting, the City Council discussed the inclusion of temporary signage, based on the concept presented by the Rotary. Additionally, at its July 14th meeting, the City Council further discussed the Agreement that includes a provision that requires payment of the costs of the Agreement by the Rotary and determined that it was reasonable for the costs to be covered by the City due to the community benefit of the project. Staff was directed to amend the Agreement to allow temporary signage for the Rotary project and to remove the requirement that the legal costs for the Agreement be paid by the Rotary. Requested Action. A draft resolution has been prepared for the HRA's consideration which provides its consent to the First Amendment to the Agreement and authorizes the agreement be signed by the Mayor and the City Manager. RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LIMITED USE AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENTS INTHE HARBOR DISTRICT BETWEEN THE CITYOF MOUND, MOUND HRA AND MOUND WESTONKA ROTARY CLUB WHEREAS, the City Council, at its May 12, 2015 meeting, adopted a Resolution approving the Public Lands Permit for the Phase 2 improvements in the Harbor District for the Mound Westonka Rotary Club ('Rotary") project, subject to conditions including, but not limited to, the execution of a Limited Use Agreement ( "Agreement') between the City of Mound and the applicant and consent to the Agreement by the Mound HRA as some parcels in the Harbor District are owned by the Mound HRA; and WHEREAS, the Mound HRA, at its May 12, 2015 meeting, adopted a Resolution granting its consent to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, at its June 23, 2015 meeting, the City Council discussed the inclusion of temporary signage, based on the concept presented by the Rotary. At its July 14, 2015 meeting, the City Council discussed the provision in the Agreement that required payment of the Agreement costs by the Rotary and determined that it was reasonable for the costs to be covered by the City due to the community benefit of the project; and WHEREAS, Staff was directed to amend the Agreement to allow temporary signage for the Rotary Project and to remove the requirement that the legal costs for the Agreement be paid by the Rotary; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement between the City of Mound, the Mound HRA and the Mound Westonka Rotary Club for the Rotary project and hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement, in substantially the same form as Exhibit A. The City Attorney is authorized to make any required revisions and /or changes to the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement that are keeping with the intent of this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 2015. Chair Mark Wegscheid Catherine Pauche, City Clerk _1890_ Exhibit A :- FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LIMITED USE AGREEMENT This FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LIMITED USE AGREEMENT (the "First Amendment ") is made by and between the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Mound, a public body corporate and politic and a political subdivision of Minnesota, both of which are located at 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, Minnesota 55364 (collectively, the "Owners ") and Rotary Club of Mound - Westonka, a nonprofit corporation located at P.O. Box 264 Mound, Minnesota 55364 (the "Developer "). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owners and Developer entered into that certain Limited Use Agreement as of June, 15, 2015 (the "Agreement ") for the property legally described on the attached Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property "); and WHEREAS, Owners and Developer wish to amend the Agreement as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and obligations contained herein, Owners and Developer agree as follows: 1. The Public Lands Permit approved on May 12, 2015 for the Phase 2 improvements shall also include temporary signs as discussed in concept at the June 23, 2015 City Council meeting. Such temporary signs are subject to the provisions of the Mound City Code of Ordinances and all other conditions provided in writing by the City of Mound to the Developer. 2. The City of Mound agrees to pay the Owners' legal and administrative costs attributable to the drafting and recording of the Agreement and this First Amendment. The Developer agrees to be responsible for all other costs to the Owners and to the Developer that arise from or are otherwise attributable to the Agreement and this First Amendment. 3. Except as specifically noted in this First Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owners and Developer have executed this First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement this day of 2015. - 18192- 459391VI MJM MU220 -6 C STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF MOUND Mark Wegscheid Its Mayor Kandis Hanson Its City Manager This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of 2015, by Mark Wegscheid and Kandis Hanson, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, for the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public -1893 - L 959391v1 MJM MU220 -6 Lo : STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF MOUND Mark Wegscheid Its President Kandis Hanson Its Executive Director This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2015, by Mark Wegscheid and Kandis Hanson, the President and Executive Director, respectively, for the Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Mound, a public body corporate and politic and a political subdivision of Minnesota, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public -V4- 459391VI MJM Mu220 -6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ROTARY CLUB OF MOUND - WESTONKA Kevin Ehlinger Its President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, by Kevin Ehlinger, the President of the Rotary Club of Mound - Westonka, a nonprofit corporation located in Minnesota, by and on behalf of said corporation THIS DOCUMENT DRAFTED BY: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered (MJM) 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 470 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337 -9300 :• 459391v1 MJM MU220 -6 Notary Public IW I Legal Description of the Property 1:'• 465006vl MJM MU220 -6 Exhibit A Legal Description of Parcels Parcel IA: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 117, Range 24, lying Northerly of the Northerly line of COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAY NO. 15, Plat 68 Easterly of the East line of the West 203.00 feet of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, West of the Southerly extension of the West line of the East 17.40 feet of Lot 33, "Koehler's Addition to Mound ", Lake Minnetonka, according to the recorded plat thereof, said 17.40 feet being measured along the most Southerly line of said Lot 33 and Southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of North along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, 784.75 feet, to the point of beginning; thence North 84 degrees 42 minutes 00 seconds East 799.95 feet to the intersection with the Southerly extension of the West line of the East 17.40 feet of said Lot 33, said 17.40 feet being measured along the most Southerly line of said Lot 33 and said line there terminating. Abstract Property. (City) Parcel 113: Sixty -six foot wide right of way, platted as "Park Avenue" in Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, then part of CSAH 15, Plat 68, Doc. No. 5011089. Abstract Property. (pending verification of transfer from County to City) Parcel 2: Lots 2 and 3, Auditor's Subdivision Number 170, EXCEPT the East 5 feet, front and rear of Lot 3, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. (HRA) Parcel 3: Lot 4 and the East 5 feet of Lot 3, Auditor's Subdivision Number 170, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. (HRA) Parcel 4: Lot 5, and the Westerly 50 feet of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, Hennepin County, :• Minnesota. Torrens Property, Certificate of Title No. 1126571. (HRA) Parcel 5: That part of Lot 6 lying Easterly of the Westerly 50 feet thereof and the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 7, lying Northerly of a line drawn between a point on the Easterly line of said Westerly 10 feet, 100 feet Southerly of its intersection with the Northerly line of said Lot 7 and a point on the Westerly line of Lot 7 lying 116.4 feet Southerly of the Northwest corner of said Lot 7, all in Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. (City) Parcel 6: See description in Exhibit A -1, attached. Torrens Property, Certificate of Title No. 1194611. (City) Parcel 7: That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 117, Range 24, described as commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 13; thence North along the West line thereof 665.21 feet; thence Easterly deflecting to the right 87 degrees 38 minutes, a distance of 630.65 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence South deflecting to the right, 92 degrees 22 minutes, a distance of 150 feet; thence Easterly, deflecting to the left 92 degrees 22 minutes, a distance of 100 feet; thence North, deflecting to the left 87 degrees 38 minutes, a distance of 150 feet; thence Westerly, deflecting to the left 92 degrees 22 minutes, a distance of 100 feet to the actual point of beginning, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property, Certificate of Title No. 848408. (City) Parcel 17A: That part of Lot 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying South of the center line of alley separating Lots 1 to 6 from Lot 7, in said Auditor's Subdivision No. 170 extended Easterly to the Easterly line of said Lot 7, excepting, however, the South 50 feet of said Lot 7 in said Auditor's Subdivision No. 170. Abstract Property. (City) Parcel 17B: The South 50 feet of Lot 7, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. (City) That part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 117, Range 24, and that part of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of the vacated alley in "Mc Naught's 2nd Addition To Mound, Lake Minnetonka ", all described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter: thence on an assumed bearing of North 02 degrees 43 minutes 32 seconds East along the West line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter 664.53 feet; thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 35 seconds East 572.01 feet to the point of beginning; thence continue South 89 degrees 40 minutes 35 seconds East 58.66 feet; thence South 02 degrees 43 minutes 32 seconds West 149.71 feet; thence South 89 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds East 100.00 feet; thence North 02 degrees 43 minutes 32 seconds East 149.77 feet; thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 35 seconds East 113.10 feet; thence Southeasterly 490.37 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 1450.37 feet and a central angle of 19 degrees 22 minutes 18 seconds; thence North 19 degrees 41 minutes 43 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve, 0.60 feet; thence South 70 degrees 40 minutes 24 seconds East 16.10 feet to the intersection with the East line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, thence Southerly along said East line 621.57 feet to the Southeast comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Westerly 648.84 feet along the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to a point 695.78 feet East of the Southwest comer of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly 225.19 feet to a point 501.31 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of Lot 11, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170, as measured along a line drawn from the said Southwest corner of Lot 11 and parallel with the South line of said Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence continue Northerly along last described course 170.00 feet; thence deflect to the left 21 degrees a distance of 169.63 feet to the intersection with the Easterly extension of the centerline of Alley as dedicated in the plat of "McNaught's 2nd Addition to Mound, Lake Minnetonka" thence Westerly along said center line to the intersection with the extension South of the East line of Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 170; thence Northerly along said extension to the Southeast comer of said Lot 6; thence Westerly to the Southeast corner of the West 50.00 feet of said Lot 6; thence Northerly along the East line of the West 50.00 feet of said Lot 6 to the North line of the South 10.00 feet of said Lot 6; thence Easterly along said North line to the East line of said Lot 6; thence North 33 degrees 31 minutes 24 seconds East 19.53 feet to the intersection with a line bearing South 02 degrees 43 minutes 32 seconds West from the point of beginning; thence North 02 degrees 43 minutes 32 seconds East 100.00 feet to the point of beginning, Except that part thereof embraced within the plat of Villas on Lost Lake 2nd Addition L(Ea� 1 r6So /�-r rwN ESm'TA " 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472 -0604 ily 14 d i[* 1: 7 e U 9111 l 1 TA l To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: July 23, 205 Re: Consent Agenda Items No. 4F and 4G --Resolution Denying Vacation of North One - Half of Unimproved Portion of Galway Lane and Resolution Denying Variance for 4730 Galway Road Summary. Following the City Council public hearing held on July 14th for the road vacation application from Justin Rock to vacate the north one -half of Galway Lane that abuts his property at 4730 Galway Road, the City Council voted to direct Staff to prepare a resolution denying the vacation to be brought back to an upcoming meeting. A variance request was also submitted by the applicant for lack of minimum frontage along Shannon Lane for the property at 4730 Galway Road, if the vacation was approved. The City Council also considered the variance request at its July 14, 2015 meeting and determined that the application was moot following the City Council's vote to deny the vacation request. As the variance is subject to the provisions in Minnesota Statutes 15.99 related to required timelines for actions on land use requests, action by the City Council to formally deny the variance is recommended. Requested Actions. Draft resolutions for denial of the vacation request and the variance application have been prepared for consideration by the Council. Staff recommends approval of both resolutions. 1900- CITY OF MOUND DR-tAFT RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION DENYING VACATION OF NORTH 112 OF UNIMPROVED PORTION OF GALWAY LANE PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NO. 15 -09 WHEREAS, an application was submitted by Justin Rock requesting vacation of the north half of unopened /unimproved Galway Lane that abuts his property at 4730 Galway Road; and WHEREAS, the application requested the vacation of Galway "Road" but the survey submitted with the application identifies the road requested for vacation to be Galway "Lane" as it is described in the Seton plat; and WHEREAS, the proposed road portion to be vacated is 15 feet in width and approximately 160 feet in length and is located east of the Galway Lane / Shannon Lane intersection and extends to Excelsior Lane /Commons which abuts Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, a variance application was also submitted for lack of minimum street frontage for the subject property, if the vacation was approved; and WHEREAS, the application was distributed for review and comment to City departments, consultants, public agencies and private utilities; and WHEREAS, as required by Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, the notice of public hearing for the City Council's review of the requested vacation application scheduled for July 14, 2015, was forwarded to the MnDNR on May 11, 2015 by certified mail as required by state law for vacation requests that extend to public water; and WHEREAS, Staffs recommendation was for approval of the vacation request based on the following findings: 1. There is no public benefit to retaining the north 1/2 of unimproved Galway Lane as it is being developed as a driveway for the proposed new home. 2. The south 1/2 of unimproved Galway Lane is open and accessible to Excelsior Lane (unopened) which is adjacent to Lake Minnetonka. and WHEREAS, the Docks and Commons Commission reviewed the vacation application at its May 21, 2015 meeting and voted to recommend approval; and -1901- WHEREAS, written notice of the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for June 2, 2015 was mailed on May 21, 2015 to property owners, per Hennepin County tax records, located in the Seton plat, the Seton Place plat, and the Seton Bluff plat to notify them of the upcoming meeting. The notice was also mailed to the non - abutting dock site holders in Excelsior Commons; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the vacation application at its June 2, 2015 meeting and voted to recommend the City Council deny the vacation request on the basis that there was no public benefit for vacation of the platted road portion as the right of way is being used and provides access to Excelsior Commons and Lake Minnetonka; and WHEREAS, information regarding the City's review of the vacation request is contained in the Planning Report dated May 29, 2015, the Planning Commission meeting minutes from the June 2, 2015 meeting, the Planning Report Addendum No. 1 dated March 13, 2015, the Staff Memorandum dated May 22, 2015 about the May 21, 2015 Docks and Commons Commission, and the Executive Summary Report dated July 9, 2015, which are hereby made part of the record of this vacation proceeding; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, the City Council of Mound held a public hearing on the street vacation application on July 14, 2015 after providing proper notice thereof pursuant to state law; and WHEREAS, the City Council took public testimony and studied the public interest of the vacation request taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinance and other official controls; and WHEREAS, after closing the public hearing, the City Council voted to direct Staff to prepare a resolution denying the vacation application to be brought back to an upcoming City Council meeting for consideration; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the interest of the public in the portion of the road requested to be vacated and finds that the public's interests are not advanced by the requested vacation based on the following findings of fact: A. The subject road portion provides access to Excelsior Lane /Commons, which abuts Lake Minnetonka, and includes docks in the City's program for 12 non - abutting properties; and B. The subject road portion is used by the public to gain access to Excelsior Lane /Commons and Lake Minnetonka; and D. The MnDNR, in its letter dated June 25,2015, objects to the road vacation. -1902- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City hereby denies the request to vacate the unopened north half of Galway Lane as legally described on the attached Exhibit A. 2. Applicant is responsible for the payment of all city costs associated with its vacation petition. Adopted this 28th day of July, 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -1903- Exhibit A A strip of land 15.00 feet in width described as that part of the North half of Galway Lane as dedicated in SETON, according to said plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said strip of land is to extend by its full width from a line drawn from the Southwest corner of Lot 15, Block 15, in said plat, to the Northwest corner of Lot 10, Block 23, in said plat; to a line drawn from the Southeast corner of Lot 18, said Block 15, to the Northeast corner of Lot 1, said Block 23. 1904- RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCE FOR 4730 GALWAY ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 15 -10 PID NO. 19- 117 -23 -23 -0139 WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 14 -91 and Resolution No. 14 -92, which granted the subject property owner, Justin Rock, a Public Lands Permit to construct a driveway over the City's easement in Galway Road and approved variances for the front yard setback for a proposed single - family home and for lack of minimum required frontage on an improved public road; and WHEREAS, the applicant subsequently sought to re- orient the parcel so that the west side would be considered the front of the parcel and submitted a request to vacate the north one -half of Galway Road ; and WHEREAS, on July 14, 2015, after a public hearing, the City Council considered and denied Planning Case No. 15 -09, the applicant's request to vacate the north one -half of unopened and unimproved Galway Road ( "Vacation Request "); and WHEREAS, the applicant, Justin Rock, also submitted a variance application for a lack of the required 40 feet of frontage on an improved street, a requirement in the R -1A Single- Family Zoning District, as set forth in Sec. 129 -101 (b) (2) for the property at 4730 Galway Road; and WHEREAS, if the City Council had approved the Vacation Request, then the applicant's parcel would have had 15 feet of frontage along an improved and open roadway. However, because the Vacation Request was denied, the applicant's variance application was moot because it was submitted by the applicant as a variance request arising out of the lack of the required 40 feet of frontage on the west side of the parcel that is adjacent to the improved and open Shannon Lane; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. -1905- No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance if the Vacation Request was approved; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 2, 2015 meeting and a majority of the Planning Commission voted not to recommend Council approval of the variance; and -1906- WHEREAS, the City Council considered the variance request at its July 14, 2015 meeting and determined that the application was moot following the City Council's vote to direct Staff to prepare a resolution to deny the Vacation Request; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines of Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby deny the variance application from Justin Rock for the property at 4730 Galway Road for the reasons set forth in this Resolution. The variance is hereby denied for the following legally described property Lots 15, 16, 17, & 18, Block 15, SETON, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 2015. Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk -1907- Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: July 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 15 -15 Variance for 4414 Dorchester Road REQUEST SUMMARY The applicants, David and Amy Roelofs, have applied for a variance to allow the construction of a front entry portico on their home. The 16,071 square foot shoreland property is located on Dorchester Road where it intersects with Island View Drive. The property has an existing home that was built in 1910 and is located only 16.1 feet from the front property dine. The house is otherwise conforming to setback requirements. The applicants are proposing to construct a front entry porch six feet in depth that will reduce the front yard setback to 10.1 feet. The front entry project will be part of a larger remodel project that will also include a first floor interior remodel and a second story addition over the existing garage to accommodate a master bedroom and bathroom. All of the other projects proposed will occur within the original footprint of the home. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their July 7, 2015 meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. No comments have been received on the project. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff. RECOMMENDATION Given Staff and Planning Commission recommendation for approval, a resolution has been prepared for your consideration. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS • A letter was sent out to abutting owners on July 21, 2015 to notify them of the variance and upcoming consideration by the City Council to take place at the July 28, 2015 meeting. • As provided by MS 15.99, the City of Mound, on July 21, 2015, executed a 60 -day extension for action on the submitted variance request. With the extension, the City's current deadline is September 28, 2015. 123 - 190 -drd Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 RESOLUTION NO. 15- DRAFT RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 4414 DORCHESTER ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 15 -15 PID NO. 19- 117 -23 -31 -0105 WHEREAS, the applicants, David and Amy Roelofs, submitted a request for a variance to allow the construction of a front entry portico on their home at 4414 Dorchester Road; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single - family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the existing home was built on the property in 1910 and has a nonconforming front yard setback of 16.1 feet; and WHEREAS, the existing home does not currently have a front entry area so the applicants are seeking to construct a front entry portico approximately 6 feet deep and 24 feet wide; and WHEREAS, the proposed front area portico will reduce the front yard setback to 10.1 feet, which is under the 20 feet required by the City Code; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129 -39 (a) identifies the following criteria to be used when evaluating requests for variances: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub.129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, "practical difficulties" is defined in City Code Section 129 -2 as follows: -1909- Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the July 7, 2015 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, the variance request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its July 7, 2015 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend Council approval of the variance, subject to conditions,as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its July 28, 2015 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. The construction of a front entry portico is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The construction of a front entry portico on the property will not alter the residential character of the street. 4. The location of the existing 1910 home limits where a front entry portico can be located on the lot. 5. The applicant has minimized the need for variances by focusing the majority of the home's remodel projects within the existing footprint of the home. The 6 foot request is reasonable for creating an attractive and useable front entrance area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variance with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 4. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 6. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 7. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 8. The legal description as set forth in Exhibit A is incorporated into this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -1911- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 7, 2015 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Jameson Smieja, Pete Wiechert and Jennifer Peterson. Members absent: Bill Stone. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Andy Johnsrud, Watertown; Amy & Dave Roelofs, 4414 Dorchester Rd; Karen Carlson, 1712 Canary La; Tom Wiblishauser, 1712 Canary La; Mark Overbye, 2642 Commerce Blvd; Jim Brand, 1724 Canary La; Troy Koopman, 1732 Canary La. BOARD OF APPEALS D. PC Case 15 -15 Variance for house remodel /addition 4414 Dorchester Road Applicant: David and Amy Roelofs Trapp introduced the request. The applicants have applied for a variance to allow the construction of a front entry portico on their home. The 16,071 square foot shoreland property is located on Dorchester Road where it intersects with Island View Drive. The property has an existing home that was built in 1910. The front entry project will be part of a larger remodel project that will also include a first floor interior remodel and a second story addition over the existing garage to accommodate a master bedroom and bathroom. All of the other projects proposed will occur within the original footprint of the home. Staff recommended approval of the variance. It is a reasonable use for a residential property and will not alter the character of the area. Dave Roelofs (4414 Dorchester Road) long term intent is to make the house more attractive and preserve it for another generation. They bought the house from his parents and wish to pass it on to their son. MOTION by Goode, second by Bergquist, to recommend approval of the variance as proposed with staff recommendations and findings of fact. MOTION carried unanimously. -1912- PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director June 30, 2015 15 -15 Variance David and Amy Roelofs 4414 Dorchester Road (PID # 19- 117 -23 -31 -0105) July 7, 2015 Low Density Residential R -1A Single - Family Residential e BACKGROUND The applicants, David and Amy Roelofs, have applied for a variance to allow the construction of a front entry portico on their home. The 16,071 square foot shoreland property is located on Dorchester Road where it intersects with Island View Drive. The property has an existing home that was built in 1910. The front entry project will be part of a larger remodel project that will also include a first floor interior remodel and a second story addition over the existing garage to accommodate a master bedroom and bathroom. All of the other projects proposed will occur within the original footprint of the home. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. -1913- (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, 'Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on May 31, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be June 1, 2015. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around July 2, 2015 inform them of the variance request. SITE INFORMATION The 16,071 square foot shoreland property is located on Dorchester Road where it intersects with Island View Drive. The front of the home is currently nonconforming as it is located 16.1 feet from the front property line. The house is otherwise conforming to setback requirements. The applicants are proposing to construct a front entry porch six feet in depth that will reduce the front yard setback to 10.1 feet. The second story addition proposed over the garage is a conforming addition over a conforming section of the home. -1914- STAFF /CONSULTANT /AG EN CYREVIE W Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Miriam Eason, MCWD Greg Pederson, Fire Chief Melissa Manderschied, City Attorney Stewart Simon, Field Officer DISCUSSION Applicant will need to apply for an erosion control permit if the project will disturb over 11,000 ft. and /or excavation of SO yards of soil or more. There are no fire code or life safety issues with this proposal. Owner name according to the County is DAVID M ROELOFS TRUSTEE so we will want some more information about that. The applications lists David and Amy Roelofs as the owners; the County lists them as a taxpayers. The variance standards in Sec 129 -39 need to be met for granting variance approval. Additional discussion with the applicant about the practical difficulty mentioned in the application is suggested so as to include in future resolution. No issues with request. • As shown in the street side elevation the home currently does not have a front entry area. The applicants are proposing a front entry porch that is approximately 6 feet deep by 24 feet wide. • The existing home is only setback 16.1 feet from the front property line limiting the ability of the applicants to construct a front entry area without a variance. • The applicant has maintained the remaining remodeling projects outside of the setback areas. • Hardcover calculations show the property is well under the maximum 40% allowed as a lot of record. -1915- STAFF RECOMMENDATION In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a variance to construct front entry portico subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 4. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 6. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 7. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The construction of a front entry portico is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The construction of a front entry portico on the property will not alter the residential character of the street. -1916- 4. The location of the existing 1910 home limits where a front entry portico can be located on the lot. The applicant has minimized the need for variances by focusing the majority of the home's remodel projects within the existing footprint of the home. The 6 foot request is reasonable for creating an attractive and useable front entrance area. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is Tuesday, July 28, 2015. -1917- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952- 472 -0600 FAX 952 -472 -0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date `9 t� Case No. City Council Date -1 - Z b ;-D S Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address Lot_" ® I P t'C��% � q (` ff �) \ ZS, i q Blocky�`� PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. SubdivigsiQon �l e1105 _E61cun , (` i /.� � , 1�/ S � U l P'�)Z o � Qj� PID # / 1 -11-7 J �3 -,31 —0 1 5 Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circlee o'ne) pa-y �QCI zz d e-li d roc � 6 PROPERTY Name l 0 � Email m -1 A OWNER Address-4414 IDo' -theS Ili ( �QC! lll o UU'A f" S/V Phone Home q5 -7 ZA G,8-3 Work (p /z,R(c38' (prj Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been mao for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (vj. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): r F�>rn VariaCee Information (112/2015) Page 4 of 6 - --FI0o C-JL ..H.a■ I za= %• C8ry) I-emcd C.1: KA 1)1I-v1��r -1918- Case No. l � J/ I 3. Do the existing structures comply with II area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (�,o ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): ��c,f7C r,�-' �1( SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E W) Side Yard: (N S E W) Side Yard: (N S E W) Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: c t ft. , 2— ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present "e of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (\,4, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: Variance Information (1 /2/2015) Page 5 of 6 ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) drainage () existing situation ( ) shape ( other: specify -1919- Case No.�� 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of any6ne having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No ( If yes, explain: 7. Was the ractical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (NV4, No ( ). If yes, explain: (,DntCk_ V, +I/A t 8. Are the conditions of practical difficul for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (,, No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? a I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Applicant's Signature Variance Information t1i2i2015l Page 6 of 6 -1920- Date / "` ✓� Date HARDCOVER A' • ,jj') (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) � PROPERTY ADDESS: U U I Lj I i r , I„ ,-J- 1�% , .T -/ _ l/ I � , I .'-j I • lr�li: t!�:�i1!• 7•T ir, � LOT AREA tt ()*-Ir SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... LOT AREA 1v D-7 SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) - ........................... Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X = X - TOTAL HOUSE., .................. ............................... �r7 1 1 DETACHED BUILDINGS X - (GARAGE /SHED) X TOTAL DETACHED IN SS .............................. DRIVEWAY, PARKING X _ AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. X _ X - TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........ ............................... �C7� DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. X — Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X — counted as hardcover. X TOTAL DECK ........................ ............................... iiJ 7 X = X = TOTAL OTHER ..................... ............................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .................... ............................... �� 2 UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ...................................... ..............................� _J (uri G!') PREPARED BY r%�' DATE l -f Revised 1/10 -1921- N N T � a � 0C 6 0 / 'o MO 6�JSm3 b \ / o eY 0 cdpm �> c c_ aR: E2 u n �'� - _ 1- R S35 i. 3 c �v m v c O0 m3 wit rQ will 1— 2110 m �.a li % Tc bz q _d cc.v ECC K9 '"off 6m mvu o3� �.c, ,t`eEc'c Z a^° O 3 0 _ E as W s ° 1 E ''s rL c ZITO �mc= = E €c 8-E ° O E _gZj PAS a €° E_°ci&?> c_ N 3 Z c A. sly m. D3 c �,n 2`5 u3 arm ? =p p - �Z e nil 3E € _ca 5 m n l- F C - C T_ = SW _ ° t T.3A3� ccE °c �.c -t In W Q T o -GC3`3 ti_c3 &3 Y�� ?ag EF`LZ Um to 'on! 0 3 im3 m� mt r o -� i a > >� �, .O 3 2s 619225'" � c l��L ¢o a ' .fin >E pZ cu. .. ,<� v2 vVi_..c c -3 N.nv min s. ._e�c� ~.. c U�.,c m O �g IBrMi GARAGE n.enT' -b —1 D I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN - EXISTING I /4' = P -0' l.. FAMILY ROOM LIVI DINIpY' LIVING ROOM DINING ROOM ApPR FNISHED FLOOR AREA = 10020 Yra r 3 . WDE i b't [xlerPr. I BEDROOM °I MD I mrMA Bj DROOM �1 I 1 I I HA6L I I I � 11 I I II STUDY ; IDTOHEN i. ApPR FNISHED FLOOR AREA = 10020 -1924- imi P: 952.250.4 sazt FASrnty Av MINNEINISiA, MN IMF0PiAMN01F AJNiflAR00.5 SU&CONTMRI r°c�dvtip� �rUa vlwwm rMremmDUmu¢N spaaFMefq�se` celp. gaarp.argv mpgeMmv°u�sri Mm0.�oWnmuu F U COO w q �" qq °N 6 o r4 o q Q � o °n ti ISSUE fJimY WPwg A1525 REVISIONS IYrAM°A'vp10i52ID rcae Pariastcat RnIMrNq A1S�.6 411si1Pelw AiS19 0k ksw IDiS 18 JOB p3Wi4 SMEElk a v... i � [xlerPr. I BEDROOM °I I mrMA Bj DROOM �1 I 1 I I I I I I I I WALL WALL e As I i. erlPrNa B$DROOM i3 I s'.q. D' ewDrMV I I BB TH I °I -1924- imi P: 952.250.4 sazt FASrnty Av MINNEINISiA, MN IMF0PiAMN01F AJNiflAR00.5 SU&CONTMRI r°c�dvtip� �rUa vlwwm rMremmDUmu¢N spaaFMefq�se` celp. gaarp.argv mpgeMmv°u�sri Mm0.�oWnmuu F U COO w q �" qq °N 6 o r4 o q Q � o °n ti ISSUE fJimY WPwg A1525 REVISIONS IYrAM°A'vp10i52ID rcae Pariastcat RnIMrNq A1S�.6 411si1Pelw AiS19 0k ksw IDiS 18 JOB p3Wi4 SMEElk a LOWER LEVEL PLAN - EXI5TING 114' n LOWER LEVEL PLAN - PROPOSED -1925- QSOUTNWEST ELEVATION EXISTING \�/ va i o r NORTHWEST ELEVATION - EXISTING Re PB cnw"n Bb -1926- n SOUTHEAST ELEVATION - LAKESIDE - EXISTING .aa va• . r -m• -1927- NORTkWEST ELEVATION - STREET SIDE - EXISTING va• = r -m• e 0 Z Q IL w W z F 0 a LL W Z X a a 1� i` s a Q 0 0 J 0 W_ N Z X a a 11i Q Q Z Q J a w w J wa p W'a'lIK �9WLitlli 509 NI'11��K �� Q I -1929- S s M-1 ar srj a 111 0 Z 0 H Q ll1 J w i- w 3 S. f— e vaosaKKM `axnow QVOld TI'HSSaHo'dOQ 4144 aamafflsaa sJo la :a iu ?IOd omgauOwgI w TIOIZIQm' GRSOdOBd e MEMORANDUM Date: July 23, 2015 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Catherine Pausche, Finance Director /Clerk/Treasurer Subject: Tax Abatement Bonds vs. HRA Limited Tax Pledge Bonds At the June 23rd Council meeting, Stacie Kvilvang of Ehlers explained that changes in state statute have given municipalities authority to issue Tax Abatement Bonds. This was not an option in 2006 when we issued the HRA Limited Tax Pledge Bonds to finance the Transit Center and refunding these bonds will produce significant savings. The estimates provided at the June 23rd Council meeting estimated over $370,000 in present value savings. In order to issue the Tax Abatement Bonds, the City has to do the following: 1) "Acquire" the Transit Deck from the HRA 2) Remove the two parcels that the Transit Center is located on from the TIF District 1 -2 because the City can't issue tax abatement bonds for parcels located in a TIF district. This also requires HRA approval. These are tax exempt parcels and have no bearing on TIF proceeds. These resolutions were approved at the July 14th meetings. 3) Hold a public hearing regarding the City's intent to abate all or a portion of property taxes levied on specific properties and get the school district or county to decline participation in the abatement (formality since this is a City -owned parking facility). School District decline at their June board meeting. Public hearing is being held at the July 28th City Council meeting. Step 3 is definitely the most confusing because when it says "all or a portion of property taxes" it will actually mean none. The taxes for these properties will continue to flow through the regular property tax settlement and into the General Fund Revenue Levy and the HRA Special Levy will continue to be used to pay the principal and interest on the new bonds (2015B). -1931- One way to look at it is as collateral that it not included in the bond covenant, thus allowing us to treat the abated taxes as they were in the past. The only real consequence is that the tax abatement parcels will not be eligible to be included in a TIF district as long as the bonds are outstanding. The bonds are callable by February 1, 2024 so it is not anticipated any of these parcels would be candidates for a TIF district by then. To help the Council envision how this will impact the certified levy, the following depicts the HRA Special Levy summary that appears in the annual approved budget: NET LEVY 204r426 174,364 167,099 177,835 CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR - 10.28% - 14.71% -417% 6,42% The HRA levies to fund the municipally -owned portions of the Transit District which was established to spur development. An HRA budget in Fund 285 has been established for the Transit District's routine care and long -term maintenance, which are costs that go beyond the debt service requirement. This fund had a deficit balance of ($10,525) as of 12/31/14. The maintenance costs have been lower because the deck is so new, and reserves need to be built up for long -term maintenance. It should be noted that the current HRA levy amount, which is limited to 1.85% of the prior year taxable market value, has decreased due to our declining tax capacity. Staff recommends the savings from the bond refinance be used to build up reserves in Fund 285. Fund 285 can also be used to fund other redevelopment initiatives as well. It should be noted TIF proceeds for TIF District 1 -3 are insufficient to pay the debt service on the Dump Bonds (2009D), and there are inter fund loans with the General Fund and Dock Fund to supplement. Staff estimates TIF may not catch -up to repay these loans, therefore it is important to establish reserves for other priorities. That issue will be part of the 2016 budget discussions and beyond. Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding these matters at (952)472 -0633. -1932- 285 HRA- Operating HRA 48,498 16,854 7,541 944 n. 350 HRA 172,325 174,340 175,187 176,891 Tax Abatement Bonds 2016B TOTAL LEVY 220,823 191,194 182,728 177,835 LESS: FISCAL DISPARITIES LEVY (16,397) (16,830) (15,629) - NET LEVY 204r426 174,364 167,099 177,835 CHANGE FROM PRIOR YEAR - 10.28% - 14.71% -417% 6,42% The HRA levies to fund the municipally -owned portions of the Transit District which was established to spur development. An HRA budget in Fund 285 has been established for the Transit District's routine care and long -term maintenance, which are costs that go beyond the debt service requirement. This fund had a deficit balance of ($10,525) as of 12/31/14. The maintenance costs have been lower because the deck is so new, and reserves need to be built up for long -term maintenance. It should be noted that the current HRA levy amount, which is limited to 1.85% of the prior year taxable market value, has decreased due to our declining tax capacity. Staff recommends the savings from the bond refinance be used to build up reserves in Fund 285. Fund 285 can also be used to fund other redevelopment initiatives as well. It should be noted TIF proceeds for TIF District 1 -3 are insufficient to pay the debt service on the Dump Bonds (2009D), and there are inter fund loans with the General Fund and Dock Fund to supplement. Staff estimates TIF may not catch -up to repay these loans, therefore it is important to establish reserves for other priorities. That issue will be part of the 2016 budget discussions and beyond. Please let Catherine know if you have any questions regarding these matters at (952)472 -0633. -1932- -1933- n K j 0 C 7 _d g X d d fD Z 0 3 d T v H M n' S D 3 c Z r m L7 A p O Dpi A V A N A 0 A A 0 V A A W A O A N�D A A n M -1933- n K j 0 C 7 _d g X d d fD Z 0 3 d T v H M n' S D 3 c Z r m L7 D m 0 v o 0 0 0 ° m a c 3 a n m w = 3 o m F m ci M X S c_ N '^a d ° O n 3 n y ;. T� r) O 0 r � N Un N A U1 Vt N IJl Vt N lft Vt 00 N W 00 W A A O W A w m O O 0 00 A v t�ri ID 0 0 0 0 a =" 0 a S `< 0 s s 0 3 m? =(D m 3 000 0 3 0 w D 3- 0 3_- 3 -° a n CO M N °- n N tD n N vii O O O O O F W c p W O c rp < < ' < m < ° < ro < a o m < v a 0 o o ' a° on -a -o a D -a c^ 3 3 < 3 3 < N CD o r� m cu 3 3 �. 3 �. 3 i N d E 2L •-r rr .+ m N X N 0000 N N N N N N A N W w V 00 lD O N Vt 00 N J V1 N 00 m w w w O W (n A V N O LD c l!� 00 Ql N N O lD Vi N W w i-� O fD N r+ 0 0 0 0 0 F+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .�. -1933- n K j 0 C 7 _d g X d d fD Z 0 3 d T v H M n' To: Catherine Pausche — Finance Director From: Stacie Kvilvang - Ehlers Date: July 28, 2015 Subject: Tax Abatement Bonds Series 2015B — Refinancing of Mound Transit Facility The City will be issuing $2,715,000 in GO Tax Abatement Bonds on August 11, 2015 (Series 2015B) to refinance the HRA's Limited Tax Pledge Bonds (Mound Transit Center) Series 2006. The bonds were originally issued to finance the construction of the Mound Transit Center. The City is refinancing these bonds with a shorter term (2 years) to obtain additional interest savings and meet statutory duration limits. The City has the authority under Minnesota Statute 469 to issue Tax Abatement Bonds for the refinancing. To meet the statutory financing parameters, the City will issue abatement bonds with a 20 -year term. The City can grant tax abatement for this term if the School District or County declines to participate in the abatement, which is typical of these entities for City -owned parking facilities. The School Board approved a resolution declining to participate in the abatement at its July 13, 2015 meeting, therefore the City can issue the Bonds for 20 years. The existing bonds have been paid 100% by a tax levy (HRA levy portion) and will continue to be paid from the same tax levy. However, a technicality of the tax abatement statute is that the City is required to identify specific parcels from which it will abate its share of the taxes to repay the bonds. There is NO tax or additional financial impact on the specific parcels listed, nor do you need to notify them or receive their permission to abate their portion of the taxes. Again, the City will continue to use the existing HRA tax levy to repay the bonds as they have in the past (at a lesser amount), but need to undertake this action to meet statutory requirements as outlined below. In order to grant a tax abatement for a public project, the City is required to hold a public hearing on the amount of the abatement to be granted, identify the properties from which they will abate the City's portion of the taxes and describe the public purpose for granting the abatement. The public purpose and the required findings are outlined in the attached resolution. �5� � LEAOEFS IN PUBLIC FINANCE - - -- -- - - - - -- 1934- - - - -. — -- Minnesota phone 651- 697 -8500 Offices also in Wisconsin and Illinois fax 651 -697 -8555 toll free 800 -552 -1171 vvvw� ehlers- i inc. con, 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113-1122 Catherine Pausche Tax Abatement Bonds Series 2015B — Refinancing of Mound Transit Facility July 28, 2015 Page 2 Following is a listing of the twelve (12) Property Identification Numbers (PIN) in which the City will abate its portion of taxes (see attached map in packet): 14- 117 -24 -14 -0006 13- 117 -24 -34 -0119 23- 117 -24 -11 -0031 13- 117 -24 -33 -0037 13- 117 -24 -34 -0074 13- 117 -24 -44 -0071 13- 117 -24 -34 -0120 13- 117 -24 -43 -0049 23- 117 -24 -11 -0025 13- 117 -24 -34 -0117 25- 117 -24 -21 -0156 14- 117 -24 -14 -0002 These parcels were listed in the public hearing notice as required by Statute and were selected since they were the larger tax payers in the immediate area, were not currently located in a TIF district, and are not likely to be included in a TIF district in the future. Please contact me at 651- 697 -8506 with any questions. 1935- N C �n •. O Y .y Q vi O Y mfr CL v a Q M 0. Q W y C 61 N N O Y E V a O c t0 N Q a p c ., m . � t a O cu Z Cf S C to h 00 m ... CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Recitals. (a) The City proposes to acquire the Mound Transit Center (the "Facility ") from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and in connection therewith refund the outstanding Limited Tax Pledge Bonds (Mound Transit Center), Series 2006 issued by the HRA (the "Prior Bonds "). The City proposes to issue General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds (the "Bonds ") in an amount not to exceed $2,715,000 and use the proceeds thereof to acquire the Facility and refund the Prior Bonds. The abatement will apply to the City's share of the property taxes (the "Abatement ") derived from the property described by property identification numbers on the attached "Exhibit A" (the "Property ") located in the County of Hennepin. (b) The City has requested, in writing, that Independent School District No. 277 (the "School District ") grant a tax abatement to finance the acquisition of the Facility. (c) On the date hereof, the Council held a public hearing on the question of the Abatement, and said hearing was preceded by at least 10 days but not more than 30 days prior published notice thereof. (d) The Abatement is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 through 469.1815 (the "Abatement Law "). 2. Findings for the Abatement. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: (a) The Council expects the benefits to the City of the Abatement to at least equal or exceed the costs to the City thereof. (b) Granting the Abatement is in the public interest because it will: (i) provide or help acquire or construct public facilities; and (ii) help provide access to services for residents of the City. (c) The Property is not and will not be located in a tax increment financing district during the Abatement period. -1937- 7165137v1 (d) In any year, the total amount of property taxes abated by the City by this and other abatement resolutions, if any, shall not exceed ten percent (10 %) of net tax capacity of the City for the taxes payable year to which the abatement applies or $200,000, whichever is greater (the "Abatement Limit "). The City may grant other abatements permitted under the Abatement Law after the date of this resolution, provided that to the extent the total abatements in any year exceed the Abatement Limit the allocation of the Abatement limit to such other abatements is subordinate to the Abatement granted by this resolution. 3. Terms of Abatement. The Abatement is hereby approved. The terms of the Abatement are as follows: (a) The Abatement shall be for a twenty (20) year period and shall apply to the City's share of the taxes payable in the years 2015 through 2034, inclusive. The School District adopted a resolution, dated July 13, 2015, to grant a tax abatement to finance the acquisition of the Facility. (b) The City will abate the City's share of the property taxes which the City receives from the Property, in an amount not to exceed $2,715,000. (c) The Abatement shall be subject to all the terms and limitations of the Abatement Law. (d) Because the City proposes to issue the Bonds, the Abatement may not be modified or changed. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was made by member and duly seconded by member and, upon a vote being taken thereon after full discussion thereof, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Adopted by the City Council this 14th day of July, 2015. Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1938- 2 71651370 Mayor Mark Wegscheid STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "City "), by reason of my office as City Clerk, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I have compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes with the original thereof on file in my office, and that the same is a full, true and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City, duly called and held on the date therein indicated, insofar as such minutes relate to the granting of property tax abatements. WITNESS my hand this _ day of 2015. -1939- 3 7176966v1 City Clerk Exhibit A Parcel ID Numbers for "Property" 14- 117 -24 -14 -0006 13- 117 -24 -34 -0119 23- 117 -24 -11 -0031 13- 117 -24 -33 -0037 13- 117 -24 -34 -0074 13- 117 -24 -44 -0071 7176966v1 -1940- 13- 117 -24 -34 -0120 13- 117 -24 -43 -0049 23- 117 -24 -11 -0025 13- 117 -24 -34 -0117 25- 117 -24 -21 -0156 14- 117 - 24-14 -0002 Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: July 22, 2015 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 15 -13 Variance for 1729 Dove Lane REQUEST SUMMARY The applicant, Dr. Karin Schallreuter, has requested a variance to allow the construction of a 20 by 24 foot attached garage and a 10 by 15 foot mudroom addition. The 20,049 square foot property is located at the end of Dove Lane, south of Three Points Boulevard. The property has an existing, conforming home that was constructed in 1922, as well as a detached, nonconforming garage that is located on the rear property line. The garage is proposed to be removed and replaced as a part of this project. The front of the property is considered Dove Lane as it is the only portion of the property that is along a dedicated public street. The existing home is located approximately 24 feet from the front of the lot and more than 90 feet from the shoreline. The project will replace the detached garage with an attached garage located 3.9 feet from the rear property line. The garage orientation will switch from the front to the side as a part of the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommended approval of a 9 foot variance based on the finding that the orientation of the lot results in the rear being more similar to a side yard. While not what was requested by the applicant, the variance would allow a 6 foot setback rather than the 15 foot setback that is required. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their July 7, 2015 meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. Two neighbors that commented on the request were opposed to the request, while one was in support. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the variance due to a lack of practical difficulties given the large size of the lot and ability to construct the proposed project within the assigned setbacks. REQUESTED ACTION Given that Staff recommended approval of a 9 foot variance and the Planning Commission recommended denial of any variance, a resolution has not been prepared for your consideration. Staff asks that the City Council provide direction on the resolution to be prepared for consideration at the August 11, 2015 meeting. 123 -1941 hird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612)338 -0800 Fax(612)338 -6838 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS • A letter was sent out to abutting owners on July 20, 2015 to notify them of the variance and upcoming consideration by the City Council to take place at the July 28, 2015 meeting. • As provided by MS 15.99, the City of Mound, on July 19, 2015, executed a 60 -day extension for action on the submitted variance request. With the extension, the City's current deadline is September 17, 2015. 123 .-! ,942-ird Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 (612) 338 -0800 Fax (612) 338 -6838 MINUTE EXCERPTS • •. a • JULY 7, c Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, David Goode, Jameson Smieja, Pete Wiechert and Jennifer Peterson. Members absent: Bill Stone. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Andy Johnsrud, Watertown; Amy & Dave Roelofs, 4414 Dorchester Rd; Karen Carlson, 1712 Canary La; Tom Wiblishauser, 1712 Canary La; Mark Overbye, 2642 Commerce Blvd; Jim Brand, 1724 Canary La; Troy Koopman, 1732 Canary La. BOARD OF APPEALS A. PC Case 15 -13 Variance for House remodel /addition 1729 Dove Lane Applicant: Mike Mann /Lecy Brothers /Karin Schallreuter Consultant Rita Trapp introduced the variance request. The applicant, Mike Mann of Lecy Brothers, on behalf of owner, Dr. Karin Schallreuter, has requested a variance to allow the construction of 20 by 24 foot attached garage and a 10 by 15 foot mudroom addition. The 20,049 square foot property is located at the end of Dove Lane, south of Three Points Boulevard. The property has an existing, conforming home that was constructed in 1922, as well as a detached, nonconforming garage that is located on the rear property line. The garage is proposed to be removed and replaced as a part of this project. One of the design reasons for the variance is to not block view from the living room windows. Sarah Smith noted the City sent out letters last week to abutting property owners per policy about the Planning Commission meeting and expressed her regret for the short notice due to the holiday weekend. Smith also commented that it was mentioned to her that some neighbors had not received notice. Staff recommends approval of a 9 foot variance rather than the 11.1 foot variance requested by the applicant due to the orientation of the lot and placement of the home on the lot. Baker asked how staff came up with a 9 foot variance. Trapp said that a 6 foot setback is standard side setback for a lot of record and that, although this is technically a rear it acts like a side. -1943- Goode asked if there is more time needed for neighbor commentary. Staff will attempt to give more notice for the Council meeting. Andy Johnsrud (Lecy Brothers) stated that his client is out of the country. He showed photos of the current house as well as the garage structure to be removed. Dr. Karen J. Carlson (1712 Canary Lane) is a working individual and received the notice as well as the packet information. She is strongly opposed to the variance. She wants the 15 foot setback requirement to be maintained. The home has beautiful windows on the lake side.. Troy Koopman (1732 Canary Lane) is in favor of the proposed variance as they will be asking for special consideration for a future project at his house. Jimmy Brand (1724 Canary Lane) thinks that it is ridiculous that someone with such a large lot needs a variance to build a garage. The PC should reject the request. It's going to ruin my privacy. He is trying to protect his view and the large investment he has in his property. The design could be well done to the north and the east. Peterson asked if the house was within the 15 foot setback. Smith said the house is at 18 feet Smieja understands the applicants wanting the dinette, but there doesn't seem to be a practical difficulty. Baker also would not recommend the variance. MOTION by Smieja, second by Wiechert, to recommend denial of the variance. MOTION carried unanimously. Findings of Fact: No practical difficulty within the large confines of the lot and given setbacks. -1944- PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: HK i Planning Commission Rita Trapp, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director July 1, 2015 15 -13 Variance Mike Mann of Lecy Brothers on behalf of owner, Dr. Karin Schallreuter 1729 Dove Lane (PID # 13- 117 -24 -13 -0050) July 7, 2015 Low Density Residential R -1A Single - Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Mike Mann of Lecy Brothers, on behalf of owner, Dr. Karin Schallreuter, has requested a variance to allow the construction of a 20 by 24 foot attached garage and a 10 by 15 foot mudroom addition. The 20,049 square foot property is located at the end of Dove Lane, south of Three Points Boulevard. The property has an existing, conforming home that was constructed in 1922, as well as a detached, nonconforming garage that is located on the rear property line. The garage is proposed to be removed and replaced as a part of this project. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129 -39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129 -2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. -1945- (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS The variance application was submitted on May 21, 2015. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" forthe purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be May 22, 2015. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around July 2, 2015 to inform them of the variance request. SITE INFORMATION The 20,049 square foot shoreland property is located at the end of Dove Lane. The front of the property is considered Dove Lane as it is the only portion of the property that is along a dedicated public street. The existing home, which was built in 1922, is located approximately 24 feet from the front of the lot and more than 90 feet from the shoreline. The property also has a detached, nonconforming garage located on the rear property line that is proposed to be removed as part of this project. The project will replace the detached garage with a 20 by 24 foot attached garage located 3.9 feet from the rear property line. The garage orientation will switch from the front to the side as a part of the project. The project will also include a 10 by -1946- 15 foot mudroom /dinette addition that will connect the existing home to the proposed garage. STAFF /CONSULTANT /AGENCYREVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See additional comments provided below: Eric Hoversten, Public Works Director Ray Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Matthew Cook, MCWD Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Dir DISCUSSION Determination is needed about whether the variance requested is the minimum needed. While it blocks more of the living room windows, the variance could be reduced from 11.1 to 8.9 feet if a continuous wall is formed by the dinette, mudroom, and garage. Given the amount of buildable area on the lot there is a question about whether the minimum variance requirement has been met. The project, as presented, would only trigger our Erosion Control rule if the project disturbed an area of 5,000 sq ft or more, or grades, excavates, fills, or stores 50 cubic yards or more of soil. It is recommended that the applicant runs their project by the district before beginning construction. Having a garage for all season protection of vehicles is reasonable. Proposed 20' x 24' size is fairly common for 2 -car garage. Due to unique orientation of lot that fronts Dove Lave, west set back is "rear" and would normally be a side. Orientation of lot and position /orientation of house affect location of proposed addition, including current layout. Support need for variance. • The applicant's representative, Mike Mann of Lecy Bros., provided additional information regarding how the proposed project meets the criteria for a variance. Mr. Mann notes that the floor plan of the existing home was a factor in the design of the proposed project. The living room of the home has only one exterior wall that is facing north. The applicants did not want to block the view from the living room with the garage. Thus, the garage was placed closer to the rear property line. The applicant notes that the new garage will have a setback of 3.9 inches, versus the old garage which was on the property line. • As noted in the Staff /Consultant /Agency Review section, Staff have expressed concerns about whether or not the variance has been minimized for this project. One of the factors that has been difficult for Staff members is the size of the lot and the available space on the property for an addition. Given the available space, Staff questions whether the variance could be reduced with alternative designs. One challenge that Staff does recognize is the orientation of this lot and the placement -1947- of the home within that orientation. This lot does not have a typical lakeshore lot configuration with the front yard facing the street and the rear yard being the lakeshore. Instead, the front yard is on the east, the rear yard is on the west, and what is considered a side yard is the Lakeshore. This poses challenges as the home is oriented to use the lakeshore side as the rear yard. Thus, what is designated as a rear yard is really used more like a side yard. Recognizing that challenge, Staff would suggest it to be reasonable to allow the proposed garages and additions to come within six feet of the property line, similar to how other lot of record properties in the R -1A District are treated relative to side yards. This would reduce the variance request to 9 feet instead of 11.1 feet. • Hardcover calculations were provided on the survey and show that the proposed project will remain under the maximum 40% allowed for a lot of record. Hardcover will be confirmed during the building permit process. There are building and /or fire codes related to proximity of structures within certain distances to lot lines which includes regulations related to openings and projections openings and also requires fire rating. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In accordance with City Code Sec. 129 -39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a 9 foot rear yard setback variance to construct a 20 by 24 foot garage and a 10 by 15 foot mudroom /dinette subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and /or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 4. No future approval of any development plans and /or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. .,; 6. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 7. No building permits will be issued until any and /or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129 -39 (a) are met. 2. The construction of an attached garage, mudroom, and dinette is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The construction of the garage, mudroom, and dinette on the property will not alter the residential character of the street. 4. While the lot has sufficient space for the construction of conforming structures, the orientation of the lot due to its Lakeshore location affects how the lot is used. In addition, the potential locations for a mudroom, dinette, and attached garage are limited due the location of the existing 1922 home. The portion of the yard designated as rear according to the City Code is more similar in its use on this property to a side yard. The granting of a 9 foot rear yard setback variance provides relief, while maintaining a setback that is similar to side yards on other R1 -A properties. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is Tuesday, July 28, 2015. -1949- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952- 472 -0600 FAX 952- 472-0620 *A' $ Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date City Council Date Please type or print legibly Case No. / 5-t3 SUBJECT Address 172-2 2-2 ® ®t/E 4-14-VE , °1f0 ukVt t 141V. S�36y s 4t Lot �Org�, ! 101V-5 or m - ;4. �, 4t' nrrJ Block l PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. Subdivision �/ 2� M W 8� I / l C 1 rZ 21 q ( 3 ®© 150 PID # zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 BI B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name 09, 14)-R1rJ 5CL}14L1-REtJTGR Email OWNER Address Phone Home Work Fax APPLICANT Name Email Ms 4tN—'Y6.<&5; (IF OTHER Address lS -D1-4 1fl u�4's r!y tit fnLt c"'TZ3rt�i /�r`ll �S zI <— THAN OWNER) r�Fi 9S2-9y'l 9�19� �l4terJc 2(i�` Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No ( >O. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): word Variance Information (1/2/2015) Page 4 of 6 -1950- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No g). If no, specify each non - conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): J= 7!t5fr&6 D�� G L4r �ra�3�12 uar�y� 15 P. o1J R PJ�o(�8s2T�� L I o , yvr �� To r3� Sl, (o' Rm Rim SETBACKS: Front Yard: Side Yard: (NSOW) (SS EW) Side Yard: (N S E W) Rear Yard: (N S E�& Lakeside: (N JE W ) (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: E 6— ft. ft. 1:5 ft, 5-0 ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) yl' 3 ft. 04 q ft. ft. /s3 ft. uiA ft. 2,r) 9 C) Lf q ft 3x]5"1 sq ft u� ft. ft. l0� ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present �use of the property 7t4orm to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is W located? Yes ' No ( ). If no, spec each non - conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? () too narrow () topography () soil ( ) too small () drainage VQ existing situation 'A too shallow () shape () other: specify Co er /&D 774o,– 6 Af L Y �DA X777 c +L, L-& c yl z-7 e5�? Variance Information A-✓w V"— " :5.017-16, 1!5- r? (1/2i2015) Page 5 of 6 _1951- a B Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No K if yes, explain: 7. Was the practic I difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No V)). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: ��` L�;f5i7s�(� S-G/. ksG - // ^6-uj L_e� % /T 40ill I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as m owner's Sig Applicant's ay be required by law. y,, r nature �� Date Signature Date Variance Information (1/2/2015) Page 6 of 6 -1952- HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTYADDESS: TZ-2 ® ®U6 4-,e JE OWNER'S NAME: M, P<��R f/U SGl f �C L�2 ETJ Z LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ......... ............................... r!n cc? 15- LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129 -385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE iO' 7 X 2. a, 5- = L Z,o'%, % GbG�'N TOTAL HOUSE ............... .........................3 ®.... DETACHED BUILDINGS X = (GARAGE /SHED) 0 TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS .......................... DRIVEWAY, PARKING�L`0 AREAS, SIDEWALKS ETC. rJ21 E TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. X = Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X = counted as hardcover. X = TOTAL DECK ........................ ............................... X = 0. TOTAL OTHER ..................... ............................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................. ............................... UNDER! OER (indicate PREPARED BY 1111A Revised 1/10 -1953- Z6 2-:T 3 0 37 s DATE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR LECY BROS. HOMES N 89 °4934" IF 80.00 I 1a" az y F r � 9 s tt' �--PROPOSED noolrlon r 1. W e W v / / e w, h N ? me �MSNNG • / e -V c �iA0G9� /��j � r� T -243 '� q v � i 8 PROPOSED HARDCOVER ' j Mouse u��i � tiD J y lYp.py . k , -� � -� SSS9 I 5b. Ovm9wa IP490 ] SSp G eo vorn 30 sg. rFFfff. lf- &Walks 321 19,1 Chic.. 702 3 S,R. . . ^'Igr total Covero" 3,]510 59Ff. 'YW1 T PI'S eoe RJ Lot All 40.069 50Ft. EXISnNG HARDCOVER 1,0473 S9.R. / Gam9e J027 SP.Ff. / / t 45 lefus & wous Jill "I"t, // 33 Sz � • coe9= 7.617 s9F. ah" i or 5aF1. N$ a of Co—,c = 14.0 X eury �./ i wraa>» LAKE MINNETONKA kr tMrono ebohi wo., rz zaf PROPERTY DESCRIPTION; Lots 6,7,$& 9, Block 11, Also the adjacent part of Wiot0 common lying between the Southwesterly extension of the Westerly one of said Lot 9 and the Southwesterly extension o Ourotes fro, m ent of the obetadins of Oove Lane. Denotes found m perch? Note: for the purposes of this drawing, the bearing of the Post line of Lot 8 is S 4'47'49" E . oobn Denotes existing elev. (000 0) Denvfes proposed elev. Note: Existing show as dashed, our m be removed —� Denotes surface drainage I hereby certify that this survey, plan o report w ,, prepared by iris 7F"eNo under my direct supervision and that I om o duly Registered Lord DEMARS— GABRIEL sorVeyor under the Lows of the Smte of A4innesota. SAND SURVEYORS, INC. 6875 wnsewC7a+ Ave. 50 suite 209 DovidE Crook _��C^ Etlinv. MN 55439 J`T Ph —(952) ]67 -04B7 Fax: (952) 767 -6490 Onto, January 18. 2014 Minn. Reg No 22414 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.odffactorv.com CEIRTIFICAITE OF S E-R LEr"z - BROS, HOAfES 89'49',34" n 80,00 el EXISTING 1101 SE 2 6 r LAKE MWETONKA DDYAPS-GADRIEL LAVD S(�PIFYOPS, INC, ILI -1955- PDF created with DdfFaGtory trial version wwwWffactonrcom Supplemental Information and Graphic From Applicant -- Variance for 1729 Dove The size of the house is correct on the survey, but our plans did not correctly show house extending beyond the east (fireplace) wall of the living room (bedrooms and bath room on the other side of that wall). So the attached plan correctly shows that the house does continue beyond the fireplace wall of the living room. So, the fireplace wall is an interior wall, not an exterior wall, and this is important to note, as you'll see. -1956- ;{ ( -1957- ƒ ) ! : . � \ \ {: � � \ \� i } �< }} 2 «,! \/ ,t< ) / �< }} 2 «,! \/ ,t< ) Supplemental Information - Variance Criteria In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129- 2. YES (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. NO, it will not confer. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. YES (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129 -2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; YES (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; YES. Floor plan of existing home includes a living room, facing north, that only has one exterior wall. In that one exterior wall are of course windows. Garage cannot be moved closer to center of lot because it would block the living room windows. (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. NO Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. -1958- o � Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318 -1172 Phone (952) 448 -8838 • Fax (952) 448 -8805 www.bolton- menk.com July 23, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2015 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project City Project No., PW -15 -06 Award of Quote Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: Due to the good bid received and awarded at the December 9, 2014 City Council meeting, the contract with InsituForm was increased by $36,907 via an Extra Work Order at the July 14, 2015 Council meeting. As explained at that meeting by Public Works Director, Eric Hoversten, there is still budget capacity to add approximately $100,000 of additional sewer pipe lining improvements. It is anticipated that the bidding climate for sewer lining work is still very good and therefore a new bid package has been prepared and referenced as the 2015 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project. A request for quote for this additional work has been prepared and submitted to qualified contractors. Quotes will be received on Monday, July 27 "i, reviewed and if acceptable, a Resolution of award will be presented to the Council at the July 28' meeting. Attached is a map of the additional sewer line locations as well as a draft resolution. In addition, the Metropolitan Council has received an additional $1.5 million of state bonding money, for the current lining program, during the 2015 State legislative session. This will enable the City of Mound to receive additional grant funding of $27,000 to $40,000 through the currently approved grant program that Mound has with the Metropolitan Council. The actual amount of grant monies that the City of Mound will receive won't be known until October 2016 when the final amounts for all participating cities will be determined. The final amount should be in the range of $60,000 to $70,000. These funds won't be dispersed until November 2016. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. City Engineer cc: Eric Hoversten, Director of Public Works DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is &1959 - opportunity employer DRAFT CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION ACCEPTING QUOTE FOR THE 2015 SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT — CITY PROJECT NO. PW -15 -06 WHEREAS, Resolution 15 -103 awarded the contract for the 2014/2015 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project to Insituform Tech USA in the amount of $161,716.00 (including Alternate Add -on); and WHEREAS, a Resolution was approved on July 14, 2015 adding $36,907.00 of Extra Work to Insituform Tech USA's contract with the City that now totals $198,623.00, and WHEREAS, the City has budgeted an annual amount of $150,000 fromeach of budget cycles 2014 and 2105 combined to address the inflow and infiltration problem and the current contract covers a two -year period, and WHEREAS, the 2015 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project, estimated to cost $99,000, was prepared, sent to qualified contractors with a request for quote; and WHEREAS, quotes were received at the office of Bolton & Menk, Inc. on Monday, July 27, 2015, opened and tabulated according to law, with the following quotes received and complying with the request for quotes: AND, WHEREAS, it appears that (TBD) is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with (TBD), at the amount of (TBD) in the name of the City of Mound for the 2015 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project Adopted by the City Council this 28`" day of July 2015. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid 1960- P FAAL Il'Y Of MOUND 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound MN 55364 Ph 952- 472 -0600 Fax 952- 472 -0620 www.cityofinound.com July 8, 2015 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: City Comments on Hennepin County Natural Resources Strategic Plan The City has been afforded opportunity to comment on the Hennepin County Natural Resources Strategic Plan. The summary lays out five general goals with sub objectives in each goal area as highlighted in the attached executive summary. The full Plan can be found at http: / /ww-w.hennepin.us /naturalresources. While the general goals and objective of the plan are well lain out and consistent with the City's long range planning, three areas may merit specific comment. The plan proposes establishing an inventory of opportunities within the county for wetland mitigation credits to be used when development disturbs existing wetland resources. The County will need to closely coordinate this action with the Watershed Districts — who have a prioritized preference for siting mitigation locations specific to a project or development: on site, adjacent site, same drainage, etc. The plan proposes establishing an easement program as a perpetual land -use control for lands with specific conservation value. Placement of non -county lands in the easement program must be voluntary and not mandated based on resource characteristics not otherwise protected or made a permit condition. The plan proposes establishing a coordination body to coordinate policy and governance of multiple oversight agencies responsible for resources throughout the County. This Resources Partnership must Junction in a coordinating capacity and not become an additional regulating or permitting activity over existing governance. The request for comments provides two mechanisms for feedback, a general survey available to any respondent and email of specific feedback to the plan point -of- contact, Mr Randy Anhorn. Recommend email submission of the above to the County POC, Any Council or Staff Member wishing to may review the full plan and take the on -line survey https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/Hennepi Sincerely, 'Eric Hoversten -- Public Works Director erichoversten@cityofmound.com 952- 472 -0636 Enc: Hennepin County Natural Resources Strategic Plan Executive Summary -1962- Gathering feedback on # Natural Resources .# Hennepin County is seeking feedback on its draft natural resources strategic plan. This plan is intended to guide the county and its partners in responding to natural resource issues and developing internal and external policies, programs and partnerships that improve, protect and preserve natural resources. This provides o summary of the plan and highlights strategies and key elements to meet our natural resources goals. The full plan is available for review at www .hennnepin.us /naturalresources. Goal 1: Hennepin County waters are clean and healthy • Protect and restore lakes, rivers and streams • Protect groundwater to ensure a safe and sustainable water supply • Protect and restore wetlands Restoring wetlands and banking mitigation credits Under the Wetland Conservation Act, landowners who cannot restore or avoid impacting a wetland can replace lost wetland acres by purchasing wetland banking credits. Because there are limited wetland mitigation banking credits available in Hennepin County, credits are often purchased outside of the county, resulting in a net loss of wetlands within the county. To ensure the availability of mitigation credits within Hennepin County, the county will identify and evaluate wetland restoration and funding opportunities on county -owned properties and tax - forfeited lands. In addition, the county will assist the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources in locating willing county landowners with potential wetland restoration sites. Goal 2: Hennepin County landscapes are diverse and functional and natural areas are preserved • Protect and enhance natural areas, corridors and green spaces • Establish and restore landscapes that serve an ecological function • Control and prevent vegetative and biological threats to maintain healthy ecosystems • Practice and promote environmental stewardship of the county's soil resources Establish a conservation easement program Conservation easements restrict development and certain types of use on a piece of property in perpetuity in order to protect its natural resources. The county will explore options for establishing a program that provides guidance for potential easements as opportunities arise via tax - forfeiture, capital projects or private landowner inquiries. Maintain and increase a healthy tree canopy Left unmanaged, the overall tree canopy in the county will likely continue to decline due to loss of trees from age, development, disease, pests and storm damage. The county will provide technical assistan _1963 -' and will evaluate the feasibility of providing financial and logistical support for planning and mitigation efforts related to the emerald asn sorer. Goal 3: Hennepin County fosters effective partnerships Foster partnerships and strengthen collaboration with natural resource management entities Collaborate with internal partners to incorporate sustainable natural resource management strategies Hennepin Natural Resources Partnership The county has convened a group of representatives from watershed districts, water management organizations, cities, county departments, and state and regional natural resource agencies. The Hennepin County Natural Resources Partnership promotes collaborative land and water management efforts on issues transecting political and hydrologic boundaries, encourages sharing of resources and information, increases opportunities to leverage resources, and provides a venue to address countywide policy issues. Goal 4: Hennepin County motivates environmental stewardship • Engage the community in taking action to protect the environment Environmental education The county develops educational resources, shares technical information and provides funding for partners to implement environmental education projects that empower residents to take action to protect water and land. The county supports programs and projects that help audiences understand that they are part of an ecosystem and can take action to protect the environment regardless of where they live. Goal 5: Hennepin County leverages financial resources • Integrate the work of Hennepin County and partners to achieve the goals of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment • Provide financial assistance Leveraging financial resources The Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment provides funding for projects that protect, enhance and restore natural resources, including lakes, rivers, streams, groundwater, wetlands, prairies, forests and wildlife habitat, In an effort to lessen the burden on local taxpayers, the county will seek partners to jointly pursue grant funds on projects and programs that address common natural resources issues, needs and goals. t •.M .0 1 Hennepin County is gathering feedback on this plan by hosting meetings, making presentations and surveying partners and residents. Feedback will be collected through July 31, 2015. The feedback will be used to improve the plan and a summary of the public engagement findings will be presented to the county board in fall 2015. Final adoption of the plan by the county board is anticipated in December 2015. The full plan is available for review at www .hennepin.us/naturairesources. Partners and residents are encouraged to complete the online surveys. Written comments can be sent to randy.anhorn @hennepin.us. Hennepin County Public Works Environment and Energy -1964- June 2015 34 -407 05a 14 MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 2, 2015 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cynthia Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Jeffrey Bergquist, Doug Gawtry, Jameson Smieja, and Bill Stone. Members absent: David Goode, Pete Wiechert and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Andrew Johnsrud (Watertown); Steve Shellenbaum (4317 Wilshire Blvd); Gary Vogetl (4313 Wilshire Blvd); Al & Kathy Leach (2645 Shannon La); Brian Nelson (2620 Tyrone La); Lauren Mattioli (4730 Galway Rd); Justin Rock (4730 Galway Rd); Barry Todd (5139 Waterbury Rd); Amy Buie (5139 Waterbury Rd); Christine Ralston (2945 Cambridge La); Connie Meyer (4731 Carlow Rd); Katia Carroll (5159 Waterbury Rd); Dan Swanson (2560 Wexford La) APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Gawtry, second by Stone, to approve the agenda. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW AND ACTION ON MAY 5 2015 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Bergquist, second by Smieja, to approve the May 5, 2015 meeting minutes as written. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS A. PC Case 15 -04 Expansion Permit for House remodel /addition 4713 Wilshire Blvd Applicant: Steve Shellenbaum Rita Trapp introduced the application. The applicant, Steve Shellenbaum, has applied for an expansion permit to allow for a house /garage remodel project at his property. The property is located on the east side of Wilshire Blvd just south of the City's border with Spring Park. The 5579 square foot property has an existing home that was constructed in 1951. The portion of the project that requires an expansion permit is the removal of the existing one -car garage and its replacement with a 20 foot by 29 foot garage with a master bedroom suite on the second level. The survey shows that the patio is to be removed and replaced by a deck. The deck is already there. Staff will work with the property owner to get the survey updated to accurately reflect current conditions. -1965- Staff recommends approval of the expansion permit with conditions Nos. 1 -9 and findings of fact Nos. 1 -4. Smieja asked if the observation deck was already in place. Trapp said they are formalizing the observation deck and putting the deck over the bay window would require a variance. Steve Shellenbaum (4317 Wilshire Blvd) clarified that the observation deck on the rear of the house has been there a longtime, including the spiral staircase. The house is being resided and reroofed. Smieja inquired as to the impact of that information about the observation deck. Smith and Trapp both said to strike the first condition. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Stone, to approve the expansion permit with recommended conditions 2 -9 and findings of fact 1 -4. MOTION carried unanimously. B. PC Case 15 -09 & 10 Vacation and Variance 4730 Galway Road Applicant: Justin Rock Sarah Smith introduced the vacation request. The property, which is approximately 11,133 square feet and undeveloped, abuts unimproved Galway Road on the south and unimproved Excelsior Lane on the east. Excelsior Lane extends to Lake Minnetonka and is the location for several dock sites. The property contains varied terrain with a wooded area in the SW corner and includes several trees. The road section proposed to be vacated abuts the property on the south side. It is 15 feet in width and provides access to the lake for dock users. The vacation request is for the north'' /: of unimproved Galway Road. The variance is for lack of required 40 feet minimum frontage on an improved public street. Smith reviewed the history of vacation requests for this property including the approved variance for lack of frontage as well as a request by the 2 abutting property owners to vacate the entire 30 foot right of way, which was denied by the City Council. By keeping the south % half open it maintains access for the public. Vacation of north provides frontage on an improved road. It eliminates the need for 1 variance. It eliminates the need for the public lands permit that was approved previously. The setback assignment will be different and the proposed house would have conforming setbacks. Staff has recommended approval of both the vacation and variance with conditions and findings as outlined in the Planning Report. Stone asked if utilities were impacted and if the 6 -foot setback would impede in any way. Smith stated she did not know specifics and that grading details would be worked out based on the final design plan. -1966- Baker asked if there was any discussion of angling the vacated area in a triangular line. Smith said that is not the request that was submitted and reviewed. Smieja asked about the amount of encroachment that the Council wanted to limit. Smith stated that they were showing 5.1 +/- and it was acting like a side. The resolution stated that it was to be a minimum of 6 feet with a limit of 20% of the total lot length of the south side. Smieja requested that it be considered whether we are conferring special privilege — is that part of the statute for vacations? Smith replied that statute refers to having no public benefit. A discussion ensued regarding the house plan from last fall to the present plan; the expansion and shifting to the south. Bergquist asked about the hardcover. Smith stated that the lot would get 40% hardcover allowance because it's a lot of record. Granting the vacation would not change the lot of record status. Justin Rock (4730 Galway Rd) said the intent was to maintain a 15 ft setback on north. There's still going to be a driveway on the north portion and an access to the lake for the public. Baker asked if they considered an angle easement. It had not been considered up to this point. Staff indicated that it wouldn't work. Bergquist stated that, a few months ago the main concern was traffic (snowmobile, etc); now the house is even closer. It doesn't make sense. Bergquist asked if a retaining wall needed. Rock said it was not determined until final plans with grades are drawn up. Something will need to be done because of elevations. Allen Leach (2645 Shannon Lane) — corner of Galway and Shannon; this is the access point that 99% of the dock users use; lots of snowmobile traffic. Cutting the access to 15 feet is concerning. There's a telephone pole and large trees along the access, possibly in the access or overhanging. Hopefully, people will not drive across his driveway. The access south of this one is very steep and heavily vegetated. The one south of that is marshy and impassable in wet years like last year. Galway is very hard; you can drive a car down. The Mullers and the former owners have maintained this access very nicely. Smieja had concerns about driveway activities. Smith said that the public lands permit has a requirement for an easement agreement that addresses the use and protects City's rights. The scope and intent of the activities haven't yet been defined. Smieja asked if there was a concern that the public would lose the use of the driveway area should the land be vacated. Smith stated that, if the land were vacated, fee title is in the hands of the owner; if not vacated it would still be public. -1967- Stone asked if 15 feet would be adequate for access. Leach replied that he didn't know. He's always concerned when the city gives up land that has been open to the public for a hundred years. Laura Mattioli (4730 Galway Rd) stated that the portion that they are requesting to vacate is hilly and not accessible. We are trying to accommodate the neighbors as we can. The lot is very restrictive for the size of a house. Bergquist thought that the previously planned house was very adequate in size. Brian Nelson (2620 Tyrone La) indicated that the south half is a perfect road; the north is a slope. Galway was the dump truck and dredging machines' route to access the dock area. Last summer there were fish in the pond on Excelsior Lane. Now Mr. Rock cleared it all out. He is concerned that this access will be closed down because it is too close to the new house. He asked if the driveway would change the terrain. Smith said that driveway design would be subject to review and acceptance by Public Works and Engineering; grades will probably change. The 15 foot access will be maintained in similar condition to what is there. Smith indicated that there was a fetter from the abutting owner (Muller) indicating that they would be interested in pursuing the vacation of their half should the vacation be approved for the north half. Dan Swanson (2560 Wexford La) is an abutting dock holder. He uses the access year round and is against the vacation. With the previous plan, Mr. Rock expressed concern about traffic. Now the proposed house is closer. He also inquired about snow storage. Kathy Leach (2645 Shannon La) is concerned that it diminishes property values. They won't be able to see down to the lake. It's not just people in the area; it's used by the public all summer long. The street is packed with cars all summer. She has concerns about the proposal. Connie Meyer (4731 Carlow Rd) stated that they knew what the lot size was before they bought it. We agreed to the 15 feet between their home and the lot line. They knew in advance how the road was. Now the house is moving closer to the lake and blocking some of our view. There is only one real access to the lake. It should be used by everyone. Maintaining the land is done by many; Muller's as well as others. She's against the vacation. Bergquist asked Ms. Meyer if, in her opinion, the lot size was adequate for a house. Meyer replied that it was and that they were going to build on it several years ago. Penner pointed out that it's our responsibility to determine if there is any public benefit to keeping the subject property. Smieja stated that the state statute says it must be in the public interest to vacate (not to keep) the property. Smieja asked if the easement on lot 18 that Ms. Meyer referred to is significant for the city. Smith was not aware of the easement as it wasn't shown on the survey. Rock clarified that there is a 15 foot walking easement along east edge of Lot 18 (north to south) that he thought existed from the 80's. Smieja empathized with the property owners. The City Attorney indicated that there should be no vacation unless it was in the interest of the public. This appears not to be in the interest of the public. He recommends denial of the vacation and that they should maintain the approvals that are already in place. MOTION by Smieja, second by Bergquist, to recommend denial of the vacation and subsequent variance. MOTION carried unanimously. C. PC Case 15 -12 Variance for new house construction 2945 Cambridge Lane Applicant: Mike Mann (Lecy Bros, Inc.) for Mike and Chris Ralston Rita Trapp introduced the request. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow the replacement of the existing single - family home on the property with a new single - family home. The 8,516 SF shoreland property is located on Cambridge Lane just north of Leslie Road. The variance requested is for a 17 foot front setback instead of the 20 feet required. The existing house currently has an 11.5 foot front setback. Staff is not recommending approval as the lot is adequate in size and does not meet the variance criteria. Gawtry thinks the house needs to be shifted to accommodate the required setbacks. Andy Johnsrud (Lecy Brothers) indicated that the initial intention was to remodel the existing home. The 1920's home has been added on to numerous times. It isn't economical to remodel. Stone asked if there was additional cost to homeowner for retaining wall adjustments. Andy replied that there was substantial cost. Gawtry observed that the neighbor pictures seem to indicate a precedence set for the area. Penner reminded the commission that precedence isn't set; each case is on its own. Smieja commented that the of the practical difficulty definitions, nos. i and ii are okay, meeting no. iii is the difficulty. The deck design could still be salvaged and stay within the setback requirements. Staff is not making a recommendation at this time. Smith felt they were making an improvement on the current. Have they done everything they can to comply? Are they minimizing the number of variances? Gawtry suggested moving the single portion of the garage forward and the double garage back. The boat would then be accommodated within the setback. )ohnsrud asked if the commission would rather see remodeling of a 1920's home. Stone thought they should be able to build a building within the lot size. Smieja agreed with Trapp regarding lot size and trying to start within the current setbacks. He doesn't see it here. According to City Code, economic considerations are not a practical difficulty. Bergquist doesn't see the practical difficulty. Gawtry thought they could make the gables work. It's a great house but it could be pushed back, the deck could be moved. There is a way to work within City Code. Baker, Gawtry, and Stone are in agreement that they cannot support it. Findings: Does not meet practical difficulties MOTION by Bergquist, second by Stone, to recommend denial due to lack of practical difficulties in the findings of fact. MOTION carried unanimously. D. PC Case 15 -11 Variance for porch addition 5139 Waterbury Road Applicant: Eric Lindquist (Lite Construction, Inc.) for Amy Buie Rita Trapp introduced the request. The applicant has applied for a variance to allow the construction of a three - season porch on the rear of the existing home. The 6,000 SF property is located on Waterbury Road just east of Tuxedo Blvd. The existing home and garage were constructed by a former owner in 2006 -2007. City Code has different setback requirements for decks and enclosed porches. The deck setback is 10 feet and the required setback for a porch is 15 feet. Staff recommended denial due to the lack of practical difficulty. -1970- Baker stated that just because it's a porch doesn't mean it will affect hardcover. It could have screen above and below and allow water to fall through the two structures. Trapp said the concern regarding hardcover wasn't a driving force in Staff's recommendation for denial as that can be addressed. The lack of practical difficulty is the challenge. If the Commission deems to approve this because of a differing definition of a deck and porch, then we may want to look at revising the code. Gawtry felt that there is a difference between a 3- season and a screened -in porch. A 3- season porch has everything but heating for the winter. A screened -in porch is what is being planned here. Smith noted that it's still being enclosed and becomes a structure. Smieja thought we should consider the spirit of the space; is it outdoor or indoor space? Bergquist asked if it this permeable as designed. Stone noted that he has seen several decks that have ceilings underneath them. Barry Todd (5139 Waterbury Rd) showed a photo of the deck that was just finished. The house was intended to have a deck when they bought it. He noted there is no roof on it, just screening in the space under the upper deck. He stated they were thinking of managing water with a soffit /downspout system to whatever extent is required by the City. They basically just want to be able to enjoy their outdoor space. Smith clarified that it's technically not open due to the screening. A porch is structure, has more mass, and you generally can't see through it. A deck you can see through. Your plan is a porch. It adds bulk. A deck is allowed without a variance. The soffit /downspout system collects water and counts towards hardcover. If the Planning Commission sees this as a lighter version of a porch it may warrant a re- evaluation of the code. Bergquist asked about the plan for the floor. Todd stated that they were planning to place screen on the underside. Katia Carroll (5159 Waterbury Rd) is the owner of the vacant lot on the corner and is concerned about the water drainage onto her property. Smith confirmed that there has been no grading on her lot and stated that, when developed, the drainage would be addressed at that time. It appears that the water would drain the other direction. Baker doesn't see this as a porch; it's a screened in deck. He thinks there needs to be some work on the definition in code. Gawtry thought it was more like a breezeway than a porch. -1971- Smieja concurs. He sees all kinds of screened -in options. Water management systems are becoming more popular. We need to work on the definition. There is some practical difficulty. It's reasonable to want protection from bugs. The owner cannot use portables because of the lot size and configuration. Trapp asked the Commission for some direction regarding the definition. A discussion ensued regarding the difference between a deck and porch (in its various forms) and the implications of the code. Smith stated that the thing that is unique about decks vs. porches is that they have different setback requirements. It's an enclosure but not like a kitchen enclosure; but, it's not a deck and it's still subject to the rules that are currently in place. Bergquist would support this project if it was screened top and bottom so it's still operating like a deck. The water would still go straight through. Smieja would support the project with no water management system. He further suggested that the commission probably needs to get ahead of the changes by looking at the code. Gawtry asked if, approving a variance, would allow them to fully enclose it. Trapp said that, depending on the conditions of the approval, they would have to come back if they wanted to enclose it further. MOTION by Gawtry, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the variance as proposed providing there is no water management system and no windows with the following findings of fact: 1) reasonable use of the property; 2) screening alternatives do not fit size and configuration; 3) house placement options limits the alternatives; 4) structure design does not accommodate enclosure to a 4- season. MOTION carried unanimously. OLD /NEW BUSINESS A. Review /discussion of Planning Commission Work Rules for 2015 MOTION by Gawtry, second by Stone, to accept changes to the Work Rules as proposed. MOTION carried unanimously. B. Discussion — Introduction and Community Context sections of Comp Plan Will include on the July agenda for review at that time. -1972- C. Preliminary discussion — Amendments to City Code Sections 129 and 6 on alcoholic beverages Trapp explained the changes from the "Surly Bill" and its implications for liquor regulations in the City in addition to other changes in the industry. Some considerations would be parking, permitted or by conditional use permit, hours of operation, trucking, outside music, and other parameters that need to be set. Smieja would like to see what other communities are doing; particularly Excelsior, Waconia, and Victoria. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Gawtry, second by Penner, to adjourn at 10:34 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -1973- MINUTES OF THE QUARTERLY MEETING OF THE SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY July 15, 2015 Pursuant to due call and notice, the annual meeting of the Suburban Rate Authority was held at the St. Anthony Village, City Hall, 3301 Silver Lake Road NE, St. Anthony Village, Minnesota 55418 on Wednesday, July 15, 2015, commencing at 11:30 a.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chair, Jim Willis, called the meeting to order. 2. ROLL CALL: Brooklyn Park Burnsville Chanhassen Eden Prairie Edina Fridley Golden Valley Lauderdale Maplewood Minnetonka Plymouth Robbinsdale St. Anthony Village Shoreview Woodbury Jesse Struve Steve Albrecht Paul Oehme Robert Ellis Eric Roggeman James Kosluchar Mark Nevinski Jeff Oliver Heather Butkowski Michael Thompson Corrine Heine Jim Willis Richard McCoy Jay Hartman Mark Maloney Dan Hansen Danyell Lundel Legal counsel Tim Strommen of Kennedy and Graven was also present. It was determined that a quorum of the votes of the SRA was represented and the business could be transacted. 3. APPROVAL OF APRIL QUARTERLY MEETING MINUTES: The minutes having been previously circulated, a motion was brought by Ms. Heine and seconded by Mr. Albrecht to approve the April quarterly meeting minutes. The motion passed unanimously. 4. REPORT OF OFFICERS: Mr. Roggeman gave the Treasurer's Report on the financial statements and audit he had previously circulated to the Board. In the Financial Statement, as of June 30, 2015, Mr. Roggeman noted that all members have paid at least the first half assessments and the SRA had a good bank balance for its purposes. He reported that the MMKR -1974- 464970v1 SU160 -3 2014 audit provided an unmodified opinion reflecting the positive operations of the SRA. He noted that from an accounting standard standpoint, the SRA's level of internal controls did not meet the preferred standard but to meet the standard the SRA would need hired staff that it has never carried. Mr. Struve moved to accept the Officers' Report. Mr. Thompson seconded the motion which passed unanimously. Mr. Roggeman also reported that the League of Minnesota Cities insurance coverage for joint powers organizations must be renewed prior to the October meeting and that Board authority is necessary to enable payment of the annual premium. Mr. Roggeman recommended authority up to a maximum of $1,500. Mr. Albrecht moved to authorize the Treasurer to pay the League premium on that basis. Mr. Oehme seconded the motion which passed unanimously. With renewal of the insurance premium the SRA has the option to waive the statutory limits on liability or continue under the statutory limits of liability. Mr. Strommen recommended, as in previous years, that the SRA Board not waive the statutory liability limits. Mr. Thompson moved not to waive statutory liability limits in connection with the League insurance. Ms. Butkowski seconded the motion which passed unanimously. 5. COMMUNICATIONS: Mr. Strommen reported that no communications had been received. 6. LED LIGHTING FILING: Mr. Strommen updated the Board on the developments in Xcel's anticipated PUC Docket for approval to begin installing LED Lighting in place of high pressure sodium (HPS) lighting on Xcel -owned light fixtures used by most SRA cities to some extent. Xcel had advised the SRA Board of its intention to file this petition at the January and April SRA Board meetings. Mr. Strommen reported that Xcel has not yet filed the LED Lighting Petition with the PUC. After the April meeting, Mr. Strommen contacted Larry Schedin P.E, of LLS Resources for the pricing review, as authorized by the SRA Board and budgeted. Mr. Schedin is an experienced utility pricing consultant who has been active in PUC proceedings for many years. Mr. Strommen reported that following the April Board authorization to retain an expert to review LED pricing, he communicated with Xcel regarding that intention and offered to informally review pricing information to expedite the PUC review process. Xcel did not follow up on that offer. In light of Xcel's delays in the PUC filing, Mr. Strommen requested that Xcel meet with him and Mr. Schedin prior to prior to the July 15 SRA Board meeting, Mr. Strommen and Mr. Schedin met with Xcel representatives on July 13. Xcel gave an update on the pricing analysis, which is proprietary, and noted that Xcel has also met with the City of Minneapolis on the LED Lighting changeover. While Xcel explained its pricing in more detail, there was no back -up material on which to conclude that LED pricing was appropriate. Mr. Strommen informed Xcel that at the July 15 Board meeting the SRA would be acting on whether to review the pricing materials from Xcel through its expert Mr. Schedin. Mr. Schedin provided an estimate to the SRA for a "Phase 1" review not to exceed $10,000. Phase 1 review would analyze pricing documents and assumptions from Xcel and determine whether Xcel's proposed pricing is appropriate or can be reduced further. Any further investigation after a report -1975 - 464970v1 SU160 -3 2 on Phase 1 would be identified as Phase 2 and be separately quoted upon approval of the SRA Board. Mr. Strommen reported that he had discussed the concurrent meetings by Xcel with the City of Minneapolis. The SRA and Minneapolis interests in LED Lighting pricing appear to be the same. Accordingly, Mr. Strommen made a conditional proposal to the Minneapolis representative that Mr. Schedin's Phase 1 cost be split 50150, if the SRA agreed to go forward and if the SRA agreed to participation by the City. The City representative indicated that he would get back to Mr. Strommen as soon as possible. Following discussion regarding the issue, Mr. Ellis moved to authorize retention of Mr. Schedin for a Phase 1 review. Mr. Oehme seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. By separate motion, Mr. Maloney moved to agree to join with the City of Minneapolis, provided it shares in the costs. Mr. Oliver seconded the motion which passed unanimously. 7. XCEL PUMPING STATION OUTAGE CREDIT: Mr. Strommen reported on the developments in the small pumping station outage credit complaint that the SRA has brought to the PUC. Xcel has excluded small pumping stations from the $200 outage credit that the SRA believes is required under the Service Quality Tariff. Mr. Strommen summarized the June 12, the PUC hearing on the SBA's complaint. Xcel moved to dismiss the complaint, which the PUC rejected. Mr. Strommen reported that the PUC members present firmly supported the SRA arguments, but directed the parties to first attempt to reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the matter. Xcel communicated with Mr. Strommen with an offer to resolve the dispute. Mr. Strommen reported that receipt of a settlement offer in a contested legal proceeding provides an exception to the Open Meeting law under pending litigation exception and the need for attorney /client confidential communications. He recommended that the matter continue in closed session. Mr. Oehme moved to close the meeting. Mr. Ellis seconded the motion which passed unanimously. The Board came out of closed session following the attorney /client privileged discussion. 8. SRA/XCEL STATEMENT OF WORK, PUC PROCEEDING: Mr. Strommen reported that on June 5, the PUC approved the SRA -Xcel negotiated Statement of Work (SOW). The SOW provides much more favorable terms and conditions for city paid undergrounding of distribution lines by Xcel. The PUC- approved SOW requires only 50% upfront (rather than the previous 100 %), among other favorable terms. It is effective now. 9. XCEL PAST AND PENDING ELECTRIC RATE CASES: Mr. Strommen reported that the SRA would participate in the PUC- ordered follow -up study on the electric conservation rate design that, if adopted by the PUC, may establish higher rates for the highest residential monthly electricity users. A Board member asked whether rate designs would be submitted and Mr. Strommen noted that the PUC Order allows additional rate designs. Mr. Strommen noted that he was not recommending that the SRA do so because such proposals require -1976- 464970x1 SU160 -3 3 hiring an expert that would be an expensive undertaking for the SRA. The SRA, however, has a wide range of residential customers who would be impacted by this potential rate design. Mr. Strommen also reported that Xcel will be filing a new rate case in November 2015. This new rate case is the result of Xcel's expressed unhappiness with the outcome of the previously concluded multi -year rate case. Mr. Strommen observed that the PUC has ordered Xcel to review costs associated with street lighting. That review has been ongoing and there may be a proposal by Xcel regarding street lighting in this upcoming rate case. If so, the SRA may have to consider retaining an expert if the proposal is unfavorable to SRA cities relative to current, favorable rates. 10. ADOPTION OF 2016 SRA BUDGET: At the April meeting, the Board approved the tentative 2016 budget subject to final review by SRA members and adoption at the July meeting. Without amendment, Mr. Ellis moved to approve the 2016 proposed budget. Ms. Butkowski seconded the motion which passed unanimously. 11. 2015 CENTERPOINT ENERGY RATE CASE: Mr. Strommen reported that Centerpoint has expressed its intention to file a new rate case in August 2015. Mr. Strommen asked for authority to review the filing given that Centerpoint serves many SRA cities and that the SRA regularly intervenes in such cases. Mr. Heine moved to authorize counsel review of the filing. Mr. Albrecht seconded the motion which passed unanimously. 12. SOLAR COMMUNITY GARDEN PROGRAM: Mr. Strommen drew the Board's attention to his memo regarding a recent PUC decision limiting the size of solar community gardens. This legislatively authorized program has gained significant interest on the part of developers, particularly those that sought to combine "gardens" creating very large solar gardens. The Board members noted that many cities are subscribing to the credits that are provided for participation in the solar community garden. Mr. Strommen stated that this program has a generous credit formula for subscribers and a number of cities are participating. Non - participating ratepayers will bear the cost of the subsidized credits. No action was requested or made regarding the issue. 13. CLAIMS: The Kennedy & Graven claim for legal services of $12,647.94 was circulated during the Treasurer's Report. Mr. Maloney moved to pay the claim. Mr. Kosluchar seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. Attest: 14. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 1:00 p.m. Chairman Secretary -1977- 464970x1 SU160 -3 4 W 0 0 U 0 V M1 CO m M N � m V q V N (D N m N N M M O O O iO W N M M N O M N M N N O [O O V 0 t0 V M N m N W M m 40 (6 m N N M (� Z (p N W N O O M1 [O N N N M1 M1 CO V i0 O M1 W (O O � M1 V N (O Ol N Z N � M N - M1 M1 O z W N N M m O 10 CO N V OJ m V 'O (O iO h m �O O M O N t0 O m h y O 40 2 K O Z O N W v m �% I� GJ N (O O ty N N V CO (O N M1 V M1 V N (p N O M N M1 N V (O O w 0' N 2 V M m W M h m N h N N N !� V (O N N O OJ fO t0 O O M1 (O N r W M J M1 (p y tO `-' W M l M M m V f. Co M M1 M1 (D M O B (9 N C6,6 N O O Q U t0 O m M ' O t0 M N O t0 N N V M1 N M OJ O M B (p OJ N (O M t0 O' tO O N V Q m O N — M MVOO N MNN NIONN� MM��M N < W N r r O h M O N 1 � '-' M M M1 M" a N MW IM N m = m N O M1 N O M1 M O d' t0 O E M t� M �- V N � W M of W (p fOMV N MNN NbNN�� hMvva "m fp (p N Vl N M O m ' O h a l0 O O t0 V V t� m N m W W M N M M N (p O O fO W M M N i(J (O OO N M h m V m O V m^ M O (0 M1 O W M1 M N N N V V N N O M1 DJ M1 m 0 � OO 10 lO m M N V, J 0 O o N m ry m loo r6 of m r o •' N O O N N O m 1n Q co Nom n M I+i c6 m c�i v c6 0 N � r O O W r r M N mm rnlom CD Ili Nvi MV of �o c M M r mmlooM cdQ o M r r mm Inm In ommul m M m m m o N m o o Q m m m r O) O R N (O Q M M M M N m M' m N M m m o 0 In In m N m n N m m v LIZ M O m m n n Min �Qm N m m v n m v o n n of of a vi ni N mQ In NQr r old Inr Inn nn LLJ N m m V N m m r N 1!) N (O (O Z N 1J O� 'n t(J O Q M r 2 O M I!) [p M m n O r m M Q u �J o N m ry m loo r6 of m r o •' N O O N N O m 1n Q co Nom n M I+i c6 m c�i v c6 0 N � r O O W r r M N mm rnlom CD Ili Nvi MV of �o c M M r mmlooM cdQ o M r r mm Inm In ommul m M m m m o N m o o Q m m m r O) O R N (O Q M M M M N m M' m N M m m o 0 In In m N m n N m m v LIZ M O m m n n Min �Qm N m m v n m v o n n of of a vi ni N mQ In NQr r old Inr Inn nn d u N a d a 6 N a J N O J N N a v v a C a 3 co W D Z W W U) F 0 O a w ww O w U Z Q Z LL i n V O N N m m V N m m r N 1!) N (O (O Z N 1J O� 'n t(J O Q M r 2 O M I!) [p M m n O r m M Q u �J N w = m�°vmm o O r 0 � N!� IoNNOmomQ N Q l(J N O r O O M O N (O r N M� oo In � n n O O (p m M lI) tD O Z W Q m` m O O N O M1 M N t!I m O N N M m M V LL m a OI `c_ mo�o�aa�a�'al� o W w r19a9J i a m'z- UUUmin ii t-� r i¢Or � w r- C) O InmmmmmmpnQ�m fG NNNNM (OO(O W m M (O (D Q m O IN N In M N M 0 n Q 'A m c0 Q � O M M1 m r N Q m N O O 'f) M M E Z Q M m N In O (O Q M Q m m N a N M N (p v 1 M m N t(J O N ti ' M m tl m fG n Q N m r N m Q O t0 W �mmmm'ono LOCDq`D o rnLk N mwl°o�N0 O Z�w V V m- M1 O M O� NN mmm. -NN W Z � M Ino MmN n In m o moNmm. -oNN n O IO n m n aq C N W m O O m m m n N M n m Q N M m m V n W V N n O V N m O N � N V m N N O z j �� h r N M Q N O o W W N $ w :W.� m s ti to �In�ln00000lno M Mmmo mo n.o w w No6�<o vioo viori� o v c6 viv0m (f m N Q' m m M (O '- n (O M Q M Q M O I: N (O In m O m r In N m n O Q N w ¢. d u N a d a 6 N a J N O J N N a v v a C a 3 co W D Z W W U) F 0 O a w ww O w U Z Q Z LL i E w` a a m u d a w = J E IL w m w U � a v .^�' � LL m a OI `c_ mo�o�aa�a�'al� o r19a9J i a m'z- UUUmin ii t-� r i¢Or -31n �cc fn �E w r- C) O d u N a d a 6 N a J N O J N N a v v a C a 3 co W D Z W W U) F 0 O a w ww O w U Z Q Z LL i U y C � o v o D A m j `>> c p m m o �' N Z :� O d a `m N 3 Y Q cE� o co NmdS nd 21 c -6ymn� Q '(Q'�RR- AU O O E y N d N 0 O _�JYQ N N LL LL N O' N D zUa U W LL Q JU U U6 W LLma UI-UU I- Z Q �F-U �(/JF F3(nJKN � w 0 O r- O n ' n' p1 O O W n N c 0] � N • W D) N N n n O '' N D) tD p M D) �- M O M m V O! N N W N O n N Q) n d (O N N Q) O] N T V W D) O n N V (O OJ M Q) M N A M M n V R n D) N M M n n O W n M O N V W W O M N n V W W n N N O O M W O O M V W m W M g O M O n M V O O (p n M (D Q� W W n M W O IN O] N W M W 1I1 W n N M N O m V M O V Ol M N D7 N (O O] N W M N N t+! N O O h N N N N' N �D ' O n N O V N � p 0 OJ N m M '•' O C <O O N O (p OI (O N O W W M N N W n O O] W M O Q) N n D) M M N LL N m W M n O V M N � ON O c0 W n O Opi M N N N N O N N W N N r V W M nW N 0 O n x x x x d e a e o o o e e e o a e e e d d d y@ o o e o ] O �❑ n n n O) O O n F V W N D) W O Q) (O d' tp N W (O V (p T M N N O O d x- N Z CJ V V N V N M M M N N M V V CJ V N N V V M tp N V V V N -3 U W W 6 V � W 3 °m N 9 W O) N W N 6 n < n V U (O Z V M O N S W (D N M M r [O n M N N O N M (p N (O m (O O d 0 N % D C d d C d O N O) (O n O] N (O nV V M V W V N O W O] V N N OI n V N M y O N M N W A t+J A D7 N N n o] `O (p r- d ❑ Z M Nl W W N M N �' N .- V n O OJ r O N N m N W W^ y i- W Y W M N N N N N `_ N N N d p x K W � Z a Z H ti coo W W N on W co n n�a m N rn M MN v o Nmm<o < `o. a '^ W °i-"? � o _c h `n nn<nm :o W a v W nMm v wom< q w O W oN N.-c v Sri N �ci vi vimN o rn. -.=ai vvovoi+i Z E N Z N WW 0 � 0 N Ix d O W w E w w om U rn N W O N W O N n (D N (O W N ONi O CM5 ONi N O m N O O W r N N W m U y C � o v o D A m j `>> c p m m o �' N Z :� O d a `m N 3 Y Q cE� o co NmdS nd 21 c -6ymn� Q '(Q'�RR- AU O O E y N d N 0 O _�JYQ N N LL LL N O' N D zUa U W LL Q JU U U6 W LLma UI-UU I- Z Q �F-U �(/JF F3(nJKN � w 0 O ) J > / § W) Lo 2 \)kUJ 00. /« �- � j[ /§C-4 _Z \ \ = ±a3 §5/® o±±/ LL r ±K /\ \ \\{ LO M 0 Lo (/ I 743)3 me» EC) f) \f[ ± /3J3 \ { [ ( ) / [ \ X00000 <0000 k /) /[/ « = :,a> L /` /±± o 554 J7 0 K[([[} >=g = == \ \ \\ } me» EC) f) \f[ ± /3J3 \ { [ ( ) / [ \ Addendum To Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Comm. Development Director DATE: July 28, 2015 RE: Item 4E - Replacement Resolution Page 1890 (First Amendment to the Limited Resolution) A replacement resolution (Page 1890) has been prepared to include language that the First Amendment to the Limited Agreement includes language that the payment of the involved costs will be paid by the City. Tuesday, July 28, 2015 City Council Meeting Consent Agenda Item 4E Replacement Page 1890 RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LIMITED USE AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENTS INTHE HARBOR DISTRICT BETWEEN THE CITYOF MOUND, MOUND HRA AND MOUND WESTONKA ROTARY CLUB WHEREAS, the City Council, at its May 12, 2015 meeting, adopted a Resolution approving the Public Lands Permit for the Phase 2 improvements in the Harbor District for the Mound Westonka Rotary Club ( "Rotary") project, subject to conditions including, but not limited to, the execution of a Limited Use Agreement ( "Agreement') between the City of Mound and the applicant and consent to the Agreement by the Mound HRA as some parcels in the Harbor District are owned by the Mound HRA; and WHEREAS, the Mound HRA, at its May 12, 2015 meeting, adopted a Resolution granting its consent to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, at its June 23, 2015 meeting, the City Council discussed the inclusion of temporary signage, based on the concept presented by the Rotary. At its July 14, 2015 meeting, the City Council discussed the provision in the Agreement that required payment of the Agreement costs by the Rotary and determined that it was reasonable for the costs to be covered by the City due to the community benefit of the project; and WHEREAS, Staff was directed to amend the Agreement to allow temporary signage for the Rotary Project and to FeMGVe the FequiFernent include language that the legal costs for the Agreement be paid by the City ; and and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement between the City of Mound, the Mound HRA and the Mound Westonka Rotary Club for the Rotary project and hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement, in substantially the same form as Exhibit A. The City Attorney is authorized to make any required revisions and /or changes to the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement that are keeping with the intent of this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 2015. Chair Mark Wegscheid Catherine Pauche, City Clerk City Council Agenda - July 28, 2015 Replacement Page 1890 RESOLUTION NO. 15- RESOLUTION APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LIMITED USE AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR PHASE 2 IMPROVEMENTS INTHE HARBOR DISTRICT BETWEEN THE CITYOF MOUND, MOUND HRA AND MOUND WESTONKA ROTARY CLUB WHEREAS, the City Council, at its May 12, 2015 meeting, adopted a Resolution approving the Public Lands Permit for the Phase 2 improvements in the Harbor District for the Mound Westonka Rotary Club ( "Rotary") project, subject to conditions including, but not limited to, the execution of a Limited Use Agreement ( "Agreement') between the City of Mound and the applicant and consent to the Agreement by the Mound HRA as some parcels in the Harbor District are owned by the Mound HRA; and WHEREAS, the Mound HRA, at its May 12, 2015 meeting, adopted a Resolution granting its consent to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, at its June 23, 2015 meeting, the City Council discussed the inclusion of temporary signage, based on the concept presented by the Rotary. At its July 14, 2015 meeting, the City Council discussed the provision in the Agreement that required payment of the Agreement costs by the Rotary and determined that it was reasonable for the costs to be covered by the City due to the community benefit of the project; and WHEREAS, Staff was directed to amend the Agreement to allow temporary signage for the Rotary Project and to FeMGVe the FequiFernent include language that the legal costs for the Agreement be paid by the City ; and and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement between the City of Mound, the Mound HRA and the Mound Westonka Rotary Club for the Rotary project and hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to enter into the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement, in substantially the same form as Exhibit A. The City Attorney is authorized to make any required revisions and /or changes to the First Amendment to the Limited Use Agreement that are keeping with the intent of this Resolution. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of July, 2015. Chair Mark Wegscheid Catherine Pauche, City Clerk City Council Agenda - July 28, 2015 Replacement Page 1890