Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2005-08-23
PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. AGENDA *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unlesd a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 2. 3. 4. o Call meeting to order Pledge of Allegiance Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes August 9, 2005 meeting *B. Approve payment of claims *C. Set Special City Council Meeting to discuss Docks Program: Weds, Sept 7, 6:30 p.m. *D. Approve MCES Sanitary Gravity Line Relocation Easements *E. Approve Pay Request #1 from Veit & Company, Inc for work on the Lost Lake Dump and Maxwell Property *F. Approve of an Ordinance Amending Subsection 330.1121, Subd. 9 of the Mound City Code (Subdivision Ordinance) as it Relates to Timelines for Recording of Final Plats *G. Planning Commission Recommendation 1. Action on Planning Case 05-39 Variance(s) - Construction of new single-family dwelling 4798 Northern Road Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl PC Recommendation: Approval with conditions Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) Comments by Vem Brandenberg of WeCAN and request for action on a Public Gathering Permit by Lake Minnetonka Chamber of Commerce and WeCAN for 2005 Tree Lighting Ceremony and Sleep-Out Benefit, from noon on Nov 17 to noon on Nov 18, 2005 Page 2397-2401 2402-2430 Handout 2431-2433 2434 2435-2468 2469-2470 PLEASE TURN OFF AT CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 10. 11. Public Hearings A. Planning Commission Recommendation(s) 1. Planning Case No. 05-52 Conditional Use Permit/Variance(s) Indian Knoll parking lot expansion 2020 Commerce Boulevard Public Works Director Carlton Moore (on behalf of Mound HRA) PC Recommendation: Approval with conditions An Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 350 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Mound City Code as it Relates to Definitions, Setback Requirements for Unimproved Rights of Way Exceeding 15 Feet and Allowable Fence Materials PC Recommendation: Approval Planning Commission Recommendation(s) A. Planning Case No. 05-53 Variance(s) - waiver of swimming pool enclosure requirements and (8) foot fence height 1605 Bluebird Lane Aqua Pool & Spa/Tim Belleview P© Recommendation(s): Approval of variance to waive swimming pool fencing requirements due to installation of mechanized swimming pool cover. Denial of (8) foot fence height variance Bo Planning Case No. 05-57 Floodplain/wetland permit application(s) 5351 Three Points Blvd Thomas and Heidi Niccum PC Recommendation: Approval with conditions Review of preliminary plans for parking lot expansion project - Gillespie Senior Center Action on permit applications by Mound American Legion for Octoberfest A. Public Dance/Live Music B. Temporary On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor or Temporary On-Sale Liquor Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Questions and comments from Councilmembers B. Report: Finance Department - July 2005 C. Minutes: LMCD 2471-2509 2510-2514 2515-2547 2548-2564 2565-2575 2576 2577-2578 2579-2581 2582-2589 12. Adjourn COUNCIL BRIEFING August 23, 2005 OUpcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Aug 23 - 7:20 - HRA regular meeting Aug 23 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Aug 30 - 6:30-9:00 - 2006 Budget meeting Sept 7 - 6:30 - CC special meeting: docks Sept 13 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Sept 13 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Sept 16 - 6:30-12:00 - Taste of the Lakes - Bayview Event Center Sept 27 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Sept 27 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Oct 8 - 8:00-3:00 - Fall Recycling Day (note date correction) Oct 17 - Lost Lake District Groundbreaking Nov 1 - 2:00-4:00 - Vaccination Clinic - City Hall Nov 17 - 6:00 - Tree Lighting Ceremony- Lost Lake Greenway Dec 5 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing Dec 12 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing continuation, if needed Upcoming Absences Sept 24 - 28 Kandis Hanson Conference Ci~, Hall and Public Safety Admin Offices Closed Sept 5 Labor Day Council Members are encouraged to contact City Hall prior to a Council meeting when you have a question pertaining to the agenda that warrants research. That will enable the staff person the time needed to gather the information and more adequately answer your questions in the public setting. Makes us all look good! 11 mini interviews were held to fill the vacancy for Administrative Assistant on Monday, Aug 15. The screening interviews are a means to get a better feel for the candidates. The pool has been narrowed to four and a second round of interviews will be held on Aug 22. The selected candidate will begin some time in September. Have a great weekend ............K.~ MOUND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 9, 2005 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, August 9, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mike Specht, John Beise, and David Osmek. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Public Works Director Carlton Moore, Duane Norberg, Don Jones, Mary Hill Smityh, Robin Caufman, Nick Maata Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meeting Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Pledge of Alleqiance 3. Approve Aqenda Mayor Meisel requested the addition of Item 8A, 2005 Street Reconstruction Project Update, along with adding consent agenda items P,Q, and R. MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent Agenda MOTION by Brown, seconded by Osmek to approve the consent agenda. vote taken, all voted in favor. Motion carried. Upon roll call A. Approve minutes of the July 26, 2005 meeting. B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $400,450.03. C. Approve temporary 3.2 Malt Liquor Permit for the Incredible Festival - September 9-11, 2005. D. Approve Public Dance/Live Music permit for Incredible Festival - September 10- 11, 2005. E. Approve Payment Request #4 from Magney Construction in the amount of $104,665.30 for Well #8 Project F. Award bid and bid-alternate to Pearson Brothers of Loretto for the 2005 Seal Coat program in amount of $26,584 with $1,600.00 add-alternate. Mound City Council Minutes -August 9, 2005 G. RESOLUTION NO. 05-112: RESOLUTION APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4539 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE. P&Z CASE #05-42 AND 05-43. PID #30-117-22-21- 0001. H. RESOLUTION NO. 05-113: RESOLUTION APPROVING FRONT AND LAKESIDE SETBACK VARIANCES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A LOWER LEVEL SCREEN PORCH/UPPER LEVEL DECK AND SOLARIUM FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3106 PRIEST LANE. P&Z CASE #05-40. PID #23-117-24-34-0075. I. ORDINANCE NO. 13-2005: ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 300 AS IT RELATES TO THE BUILDING CODE (TIMELINE FOR BUILDING CODE) J. Approve adoption of Foundation Survey Requirement Policy as presented on page 2313 of the council packet. K. RESOLUTION NO. 05-114: RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 05- 77 TO EXTEND TIMELINE FOR RECORDING OF SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR DOCK PARCEL SUBDIVISION ASSOCIATED WITH PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3192 WESTEDGE BOULEVARD TO BE COMBINED WITH PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3166-3170 WESTEDGE BOULEVARD FOR 60 DAYS. PID #23-117-24-33-0002 AND 23-117-24-34-0059. L. RESOLUTION NO. 05-115: RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 05- 49 TO EXTEND TIMELINE FOR RECORDING OF SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR DOCK PARCEL SUBDIVISION ASSOCIATED WITH PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3061 WESTEDGE BOULEVARD FOR 60 ADDITIONAL DAYS. PID #23-117-24-33-0012. M. Approve temporary sign permit application for Our Lady of the Lake for the 2005 Incredible Festival. N. Authorize execution of Stipulation of Settlement Agreement for acquisition of easement for road and utility purposes on Dove Lane (District Court File CD- 2774) O. Set special meetings for Truth in Taxation Hearings for December 5, 2005 at 7:00 p.m., and December 12, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. for continuation if needed. P. Approve Change Order #1 for Response Actions at Lost Lake Dump and Maxwell Properties - City Project No. PW-05-11 - Barr Engineering Company. Q. Approve Payment Request #3 from Buffalo Bituminous for $233,805.40 for the 2005 Street Improvement Project. R. Approve Final Payment Request from Environmental Associates for $2,235.20 for the Lost Lake Greenway Project (bridge installation). 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. Duane Norberg, 6015 Aspen Road, appeared before the Council to make them aware of unacceptable work yet to be repaired on his driveway and apron. This work was from the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project. Public Works Director Carlton Moore has sent 2 Mound City Council Minutes - August 9, 2005 notice to the contactor with a time frame to respond. Mr. Norbert was assured that this will be repaired. 6. Presentation of TBRA (Tax Base Revitalization Account) Grant for Soils Remediation - Lost Lake and Maxwell Sites, by Met Council Rep Mary Hill Smith Mary Hill Smith presented the City Council with a Certificate of Award for $221,000 (part of the 1.4 million grant). This grant is for soil remediation at the Lost Lake and Maxwell sites. Mayor Meisel turned the meeting over to Acting Mayor Osmek because of possible perceived conflict of interest regarding the next two items. 7. Action on Resolution Approving the Final Plat for Villas on Lost Lake Sarah Smith reviewed the final plat. Some discussion followed regarding the buffer between the commercial and residential areas. Smith stated that she is confident that the developer will provide adequate buffer in that area. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Specht to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Brown, Specht, Beise and Osmek. The following voted against: None. Meisel abstained fro voting. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 05-116: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE VILLAS ON LOST LAKE. PID #13-117-24-34-0063, 13-117-24-33-0069, AND 13-117-24-34-0075. 8. Action on Subdivision Agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development, LLC for Villas on Lost Lake John Dean handed out a supplement page for the agreement that deals with the memorandum of understanding, dealing whose responsibility it is to dredge and maintain channel, docks, etc. Meisel, acting as a citizen, approached the Council questioning what she heard, that the dock fees for these villas will be the same as other dock fees in the city program. She was under the impression that the fees for these docks would be different. Other Councilmembers were also under that impression. After lengthy discussion, John Dean stated that the fees don't have to be discussed at this point. The plat won't be recorded for some time and if the Council isn't comfortable with the provision dealing with the fees and allocation of costs they can lay it over and talk about it further. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Beise to approve the Subdivision Agreement with Mound Harbor Renaissance Development, LLC for Villas on Lost Lake, with the amendment handed out this evening by John Dean.. The following voted in favor: Brown, Specht, Beise and Osmek. The following voted against: None. Meisel abstained fro voting. Motion carried. Mound City Council Minutes - August 9, 2005 Mayor Meisel returned to preside over the rest of the meeting. 8A. Update on 2005 Street Reconstruction Project Public Works Director Carlton Moore presented an update on the 2005 Street Reconstruction Project and answered presented questions. 9. Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Questions and comments from Councilmembers: Mayor Meisel stated that at an earlier meeting the landscaping by the Church Street entrance to the medical clinic was discussed. The bushes there have been trimmed, but visibility there is still very poor. Moore will contact those responsible and have them remove what is currently there and have them replace them with something lower. B. Minutes: LMCD of June 22, 2005 and July 13, 2005. 10. Adjourn MOTION by Brown, seconded by Specht to adjourn at 8:45 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 4 Mound City Council Minutes - July 26, 2005 Smith stated that this added procedure fs really to protect assure that the setbacks are met and eliminate the issue variam Osmek like to have a tolerance threshold if you are 5' from each of the setbacks, this Meisel su leaving it is as now and have S; Staff for their o ~. in the policy, for stance, doesn't apply to you. talk with the rest of City MOTION by Osmek ~nded by Brown to this for staff review, to be 10. MiscellaneouslCorres Questions and comments from Brown stated he received an Andrews, one of the Andrews Center is. Placement of a ~embers: il from Tom Rockvam stating that Patty lived where the present Gillespie ue was suggested. Kandis stated that it was suggested that a ;ritage be added to Mound's festivals, where notable peo)¢ are recogni~, along with the heritage of Mound. / ~ Meisel received a call frCn a resident asking that the 10% late fee on the utility bills be reconside)fed. No action to change the current policy was taken./ Report: 2005 spring,lean-up Mound Poli/e Department Minutes: Fire Com,Cission meeting, June 20, 2005 Newsletter: LMC/D/ 11. Adjourn MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Specht to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. Motion carried. All voted in favor. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 5 -2401 - AUGUST 23~ 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 081105SUE $811.00 AUG' 081005SUE $238,889.43 AUG 081705SUE $14,085.39 AUG 082205SU E $1,400.20 AUG 082305SUE $298,762.36 AUG TOTAL $553,948.38 -2402- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 081105SUE Payments Refer 81105 RAHN, JODI L. Cash Payment invoice 081105 Transaction Date City of Mound 08/10/05 4:39 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2005 User Dollar Amt $811.00 Computer Dollar Amt $811.00 $0.00 In Balance G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents 8/11/2005 8/10/2005 2005 REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE $811.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $811.00 Fund ~ummar)/ 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $811.00 $811.00 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $811.00 Total $811.00 -2403- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 081005SUE Payments Refer 81005 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS Cash Payment Invoice 081005 Transaction Date City of Mound 08/10/053:17 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2005 User Dollar Amt $238,889.43 Computer Dollar Amt $238,889.43 E 401-43110-500 Capital Outlay FA 8/10/2005 8/10/2005 $0.00 In Balance THRU 07-31-05 2005 STREET IMPROVEMENT $233,805.40 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $233,805.40 Refer 81005 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES Casll:Paym~1t E401-46540-50(TCapital:Oatlay FA MOUND BRIDGE FINALPA¥~NT $2;235~20 Invoice 081005-B 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/t0/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,235.20 Refer 81005 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 02-01-05 THRU 02-15-05 MOUND HARBOR $600.50 RENAISSANCE Invoice 00-6957 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/10/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $600.50 Refer 81005 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals RADIO LEASE MOBILE KING $368.07 Invoice 123104-C 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $368.07 Refer 81005 KIRTZ, RYAN Cash Payment E 101-41310-300 Professional Srvs 1999,2000, 2005-P $375.00 Invoice 081005 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/10/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $375.00 Refer 81005 KURTZ, JAMES Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2005 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $123.53 Invoice 081005 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $123.53 Refer 81005 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 CELL PHONE $112.73 Invoice 081005 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $112.73 Refer 81005 NORTH ST. PAUL, ClTY OF Cash Payment E 101-41310-434 Conference & Training 04-26-05 SEMINAR $80.00 Invoice 081005 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $80.00 Refer 81005 RAHN, JODI L. Cash Payment G 101-21716 Flex Plan Dependents 2005 REIMBURSE DEPENDENT CARE $1,189.00 Invoice 081005 8/10/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,189.00 -2404- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS City of Mound 08/40/05 3:17 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: August 2005 10100 Wells Fargo $2,480.76 $368.07 $236,040.60 $238,889.43 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute TOtal $0.00 $238,889.43. $238,889.43 -2405- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 081705SUE Payments City of Mound Payments 08/17/05 11:53 AM Page 1 User Dollar Amt $14,085.39 Computer Dollar Amt $14,085.39 $0.00 In Balance Refer 81705 CHARLES CORNELUIS JUDITH CO Cash Payment E 401-43103-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 081705 8/17/2005 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 LAND STREET PROJECT $2,800.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,800.00 Refer 81705 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 10t.41910-321 Telephone & Cells 04-30-05 952-472-0600 $1,071 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 04-30-05 952.472-0600 $264.13 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 04-30-05 952-472-0600 $440.21 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952-472-0648 $630.26 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952-472-0646 $19,55 invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952-472-0635 $548.28 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 601.49400-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952-472-0635 $548.28 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952-472-0635 $548,28 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952-472-0600 $1,056.93 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952.472-0600 $440.39 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 952-472-0600 $264.24 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 07-30-05 WELL #8 $27.44 Invoice 081705 7/18/2005 Transaction Date 8/16/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,859.68 Refer 81705 HANLEY, PATRICK Cash Payment G 601-16100 Fixed Asset-Land RELOCATION EXPENSES $2,262.00 Invoice 081705 8/17/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,262.00 Refer 81705 KURTZ, JAMES Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2005 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $82.79 Invoice 081705 8/17/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $82.79 Refer 81705 MOUND POST OFFICE Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage 08-05 UTILITY BILLING $131.61 Invoice 081705 8/17/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-322 Postage 08-05 UTILITY BILLING $131,61 Invoice 081705 8/17/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $263.22 -2406- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/17/05 11:53 AM Page 2 Current Period: August 2005 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (POL E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 07-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $2,817.70 8/17/2005 Refer 81705 Cash Payment Invoice 081705 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,817.70 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $6,301.39 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $704.52 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $2,800.00 601 WATER FUND $2,941.89 602 SEWER FUND $707.33 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $630.26 $14,085.39 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $14,085.39 $14,085.39 -2407- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 082205CRCARD Payments Refer 82205 ELAN CREDIT CARD City of Mound Payments 08/16/05 10:27 AM Page 1 Current Period: August 2005 User Dollar Amt $1,400.20 Computer Dollar Amt $1,400.20 $0.00 In Balance Ck# 099118 8/22/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 07-21-05 VERIZON CASE $7.08 Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 07-21-05 VERIZON CASE $7.08 Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 07-21-05 VERIZON CASE $7,08 Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-41910-300 Professional Srvs 8/2212005 E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-205 Computer Software 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-205 Computer Software 8/22/2005 E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 07-27-05 BEST WESTERN ROOM CHARGE 07-25-05 BATTERIES 07-25-05 BATTERIES 07-25-05 BATTERIES 07-25-05 BATTERIES 07-20-05 INET 7 07-15-05 OFFICE MAX PAPER 07-13-05 TIGER DIRECT USP PARTS SQUAD COMPUTER 07-15-05 SPORTMART 07-17-05 CARBONES FESTIVAL EVENT RESERVES 07-20-05 BESTBUY 08-02-05 TIGER DIRECT MEMORY STICKS SQUAD COMPUTERS 07-15-05 APWA CONFERENCE,MOORE 07-15-05 APWA CONFERENCE,MOORE 07-15-05 APWA CONFERENCE,MOORE 07-20-05 FRANKLIN COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON 07-20-05 FRANKLIN COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON $93.08 $14.19 $14,19 $14.18 $14,18 $31.95 $38.20 $87.7.7 $59.99 $70.28 $68.14 $89.95 $360.02 $89.99 $89,99 $26.77 $26.77 -2408- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment City of Mound Payments 08/16/05 10:27 AM Page 2 E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies 07-20-05 FRANKLIN $25.77 COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 07-19-05 OTTEN BROS,SOD $67.89 Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 07-19-05 OTTEN BROS,SOD $33.95 Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 Current Period: August 2005 07-20-05 FRANKLIN $26.77 COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON CashPayment E 101-42110-400 Repair~&~ Maiht Contt~Ct 07;29~05 OTTENBROS;SOD $33.94 ' Invoice 082205 8/22/2005 Transaction Date 8/16/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,400.20 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $958.93 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $33.95 601 WATER FUND $138.02 602 SEWER FUND $231.10 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $38.20 $1,400.20 Pre-Written Check $1,400.20 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $0.00 Total $1,400.20 -2409- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 1 Current Period: August 2005 User Dollar Amt $298,762.36 Batch Name 082305SUE Payments Computer Dollar Amt $298,762.36 $0.00 In Balance Refer 82305 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 Cash Payment E 101-42110-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $84.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $84.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE . $68.61 InvoiCe 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $68.61 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $68.62 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $300.02 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $27.71 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 07-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $24.78 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $726.35 Refer 82305 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSO Cash Payment E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training 09-23-05 REGISTRATION $180.00 Invoice 082305 8123/2005 PO 19209 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.00 Refer 82305 AMUNDSON, M. LLP Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $1,066.82 Invoice 184709 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,066.82 Refer 82305 APACHE GROUP Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies TAPER TOWELS,BATH TISSUE $324.06 Invoice 96348 8/23~2005 PO 18918 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $324.06 Refer 82305 ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES, INC. Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay FA BALANCE ON CONTRACT $120.98 Invoice 69991-B 8~23/2005 PO 18567 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.98 Refer 82305 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $170.53 Invoice 438521807 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $135.67 Invoice 438521711 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $202.87 Invoice 438522016 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $118.99 Invoice 438522510 8/23/2005 -2410- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 08/4 8/0511:30 AM Page 2 Payments Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Memhandise For R ICE Invoice 438522412 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438522704 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo Current Period: August 2005 $69.22 $86.65 10100 Total $783.93 Refer 82305 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 06-18-05 THRU 07-15-05 MOUND HARBOR $11,304.18 RENAISSANCE Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,304~18 Refer 82305 BELLBOY CORPORA T/ON Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,775.65 Invoice 34160600 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE $187.09 Invoice 40339200 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $317.90 Invoice 34174300 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,730.55 Invoice 34174200 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $351.35 Invoice 34230200 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$124.00 Invoice 32444800 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,756.45 invoice 34244000 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,994.99 Refer 82305 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous COFFEE $28.00 Invoice 505844 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous COFFEE $36.00 Invoice 503084 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous COFFEE $10.00 Invoice 499949 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $74.00 Refer 82305 BIFFS,/NC PORTABLE RESTRO0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) 07-05 CENTERVIEW BEACH $234.26 Invoice W264287 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) 07-05 MOUND BAY PARK $494,52 Invoice W264288 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) 07-05 CITY HALL $234.26 Invoice W264289 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $963.04 Refer 82305 BOSMA WESTONKA CARPET CLE Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract CARPET CLEANING $977.67 Invoice 6671 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $977,67 Refer 82305 BRAND NETWORKING -2411 - CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 15997 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 3 Current Period: August 2005 E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract REPAIR EMAIL ISSUES $260.00 8/23/2005 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $260.00 Refer 82305 CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC. Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies REPAIR AED $292.00 Invoice 552977 8/23/2005 PO 19158 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies REPAIR AED BATTERY $267.93 Invoice 552783 8/23/2005 PO 19159 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $559.93 Refer 82305 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply STETHOSCOPE $18.09 Invoice N60020 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery POPOUT 12V SHORT $6.36 Invoice N60253 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.45 Refer 82305 CARVER COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies SERVE SUBPEONA CHARGE $37.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 PO 19112 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.00 Refer 82305 CA T AND FIDDLE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $383.00 Invoice 41657 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $383.00 Refer 82305 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities $32.32 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities $45.32 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities $52.01 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities $22.30 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-383 Gas Utilities $22.30 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities $22.29 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities $18.33 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $214.87 Refer 82305 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials HAZARD MATERIALS $11.56 Invoice 00204964 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials HAZARD MATERIALS $11.56 Invoice 00204964 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials HAZARD MATERIALS $11.57 Invoice 00204964 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $34.69 06-20-05 THRU 07-21-05 #543-000-053-000 06-20-05 THRU 07-21-05 #543-001-095-800 06-20-05 THRU 07-21-05 #543-001-853-000 06-20-05 THRU 07-21-05 #543-001-972-603 06-20-05 THRU 07-21-05 #543-001-972-603 06-20-05 THRU 07-21-05 #543-001-972-603 06-20-05 THRU 07-21-05 #543-004-818-801 -2412- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 4 Refer 82305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,020.90 Refer 82305 CHAMPION AUTO Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies POWER SPLOTLIGHT invoice D329527 8~23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair 2 CYCLE PLUS QUICKSI Invoice D331546 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair TIRE FOAM Invoice D332932 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $127.58 Refer 82305 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT, I Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies POLE BRACKET $87.50 Invoice 46347 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies AKRON BLADE KIT $191.79 Invoice 46541 8/23/2005 PO 19152 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $279.29 Refer 82305 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $488.00 Invoice 80954081 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $488.00 Refer 82305 COMPUTER CHEQUE Cash Payment E 609-49750-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 07-05 CHECK VERIFICATION $54.50 Invoice 106850705 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $54.50 Refer 82305 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 07-05 COPY MAINTENANCE $340.80 Invoice 63028 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $340.80 Refer 82305 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts METERS $1,068.51 Invoice 3303848 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,068.51 Refer 82305 DA Y DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa 'MIX $89.70 Invoice 325708 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,765.10 Invoice 325707 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,209.80 Invoice 326659 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $55.90 Invoice 323692 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $980.92 Invoice 323691 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,101.42 Current Period: August 2005 CHADWICK AND MER'I-Z E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees 07-05 PROSECUTION SERVICES $7,020.90 8/23/2005 $41.52 $63.87 $22i19 -2413- Cash Payment Invoice 228746 Cash Payment Invoice 228747 Cash Payment Invoice 49804 Cash Payment Invoice 228840 Cash Payment Invoice 228839 CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: August 2005 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 5 Refer 82305 DYNAMEX DELIVERS NOW Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-22-05 DELIVERY MOUND HARBOR $47.72 RENAISSANCE Invoice 1130451 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47.72 Refer 82305 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,076.20 8/23/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $46.75 8/23/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $84.00 8/23/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $22.00 8/23/2005 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,934.45 8/23~2005 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,163.40 Refer 82305 ELECTRICAL INSTALLA TION AND Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance RELOCATE LIGHTING CABINET M.H.R. $5,300.00 Invoice 0007140-1N 8~23~2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,300.00 Refer 82305 ESS BROTHERS AND SONS, INCO Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply HDPE ADJ RING $191.70 Invoice HH3604 8/23/2005 PO 19205 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts HDPE ADJ RING $255.60 Invoice HH3735 8/23/2005 PO 19205 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts SEWER RINGS $127.80 Invoice HH3843 8/23/2005 PO 19210 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $575.10 Refer 82305 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES Cash Payment G 601-16100 Fixed Asset-Land RELOCATION CONSULTANT $605.00 Invoice 00-7211 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $605.00 Refer 82305 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $64.00 Invoice 330713 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.00 Refer 82305 FLAG LOFT, THE Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous FLAGS $171.00 Invoice 27888 8/23/2005 PO 19156 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $171.00 Refer 82305 FLAIG, KEVIN M, Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 09-11-05 ADVANCE LEADERSHIP II $330.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $330.00 Refer 82305 G & K SERVICES - 2414- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 6534904 Cash Payment Invoice 6534904 Cash Payment Invoice 6534904 Cash Payment invoice 6534904 Cash Payment City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 6 Current Period: August 2005 08-09-05 UNIFORMS 08-09-05 UNIFORMS 08-09-05 UNIFORMS 08-09-05 UNIFORMS 08-09-05 MATS 08-09-05 MATS 08-16-05 MATS $51.99 $26.17 $19.01 $8.73 $24.57 $24.57 $24.57 $108.80 $22.10 $128.81 $28,02 $37.09 $44.20 $19.01 $26.17 $19.01 $28.78 $28.78 $28.78 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/23/2005 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/23/2005 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/23/2005 E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8~23/2005 E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials invoice 6534904 Cash Payment invoice 6534904 Cash Payment Invoice 6534904 Cash Payment Invoice 6541249 Cash Payment Invoice 6541251 Cash Payment Invoice 6541252 Cash Payment Invoice 6541245 Cash Payment Invoice 6541250 Cash Payment Invoice 6541248 Cash Payment Invoice 6541248 Cash Payment Invoice 6541248 Cash Payment Invoice 6541248 Cash Payment Invoice 6541248 Cash Payment Invoice 6541248 Cash Payment Invoice 6531248 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 08-09-05 MATS 8~23/2005 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 8/23/2005 E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 8/23/2005 E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 08-16-05 MATS 08-16-05 MATS 08-16-05 MATS 08-16-05 MATS 08-16-05 UNIFORMS 08-16-05 UNIFORMS 08-16-05 UNIFORMS 08-16-05 UNIFORMS 08-16-05 MATS 08-16-05 MATS 08-16-05 MATS Wells Fargo 8/23/2005 E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 8/23/2005 E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 8/23/2005 E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 8/23/2005 E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/23/2005 E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/23/2005 E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/23/2005 E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/23/2005 E 101-43100-230 Shop Matedals 8/23/2005 E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 8/23/2005 E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 8/23/2005 8/18/2005 10100 To~I $699.16 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Transaction Date Refer 82305 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies 07-05 WATER SERVICE $6.71 8/23/2005 E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 07-05 WATER SERVICE $6.71 8/23/2005 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13.42 Refer 82305 GME CONSULTANTS Cash Payment E 401-43103-300 Professional Srvs 04-18-05 THRU 07-23-05 2005 STREET $3,147.00 RECONSTRUCTION Invoice 22921 8/23/2005 Project PW0501 -2415- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 8/15/2005 City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 7 Current Period: August 2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,147.00 Refer 82305 GRAND PERE WINES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,572.05 Invoice 13725 8123/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,572.05 Refer 82305 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $607.50 Invoice 74663 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8!!!/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $607.50 Refer 82305 GREEN WITH ENVY LAWN CARE Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic SPRAYING SIDEWALKS $800.77 Invoice 7137 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $800.77 Refer 82305 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $801.80 Invoice 271032 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,774.06 Invoice 271031 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $957.29 Invoice 274162 8/23~2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $584.94 Invoice 274161 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,118.09 Refer 82305 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts TUBING $38.60 Invoice 61095 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts PIPE $86.27 Invoice 61091 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $124.87 Refer 82305 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMA TIO Cash Payment E 101-42110-418 Other Rentals 07-05 RADIO LEASE $1,348.72 Invoice 25078031 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals 07-05 RADIO LEASE $1,017.99 Invoice 25078030 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,366.71 Refer 82305 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A Cash Payment G 101-22805 Police Forfeiture Program WEST METRO DRUG TASK FORCE $5,000.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/16/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 82305 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance MAILING MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $67.50 Invoice 2005-76 8/23/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23008 2020 Commerce Parking Lot 2020 COMMERCE #05-28 $96.25 Invoice 2005-88 8/23/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 MAILING METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $150,00 Invoice 2005-84 8/23/2005 -2416- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 8/4/2005 City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 8 Current Period: August 2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $313.75 Refer 82305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Cash Payment invoice 082305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Cash Payment invoice 082305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Cash Payment invoice 082305 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I G 101-23038 4552 Denbigh Rd #05-08 ~1o 07-05 4552/4568 DENBIGH #05-08/#05-23 $373.75 8/23~2005 G 101-23060 4539 Islandview Dr #05-42/4 07-05 4539 ISLANDVIEW #05-42/#05-43 $666,25 8/23/2005 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-05 MOUND HARBOR'RENAISSANCE $16.25 8/23/2005 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $970.75 8/23/2005 E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 CTY RD 15 STREETSCAPE 8/23/2005 E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 LOST LAKE GREENWAY 8/23/2005 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE 8/23/2005 E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 MISC PLANNING 8/23/2005 G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 MOUND VISIONS Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,490.68 Refer 82305 HOLASEK, FRED AND SON, INCOR Cash Payment G 101-22808 Adopt A Green Space GREEN SPACE AT DEPOT $401.38 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $401.38 Refer 82305 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE) . Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies PLASTIC BAGS,CARGO NETS,ETC $459.23 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $459.23 Refer 82305 HOME DEPOT/GECF (PA/V) _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply SILT FENCE $62.05 Invoice 009787/5103518 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $62.05 Refer 82305 IKON OFFICE MACHINES Cash Payment E 101-42110-202 Duplicating and copying 07-24-05 THRU 08-24-05 COPIER $206.84 MAINTENANCE Invoice 23807049 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $206.84 Refer 82305 IMPACT MEDICAL COMPANY Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair REPAIR PORTABLE ASPIRATOR $146.35 Invoice 72799 8/23/2005 PO 19157 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $146.35 Refer 82305 ISLAND PARK SKELL Y Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery 1990 CHEV PICKUP EXT MIRROR $97.62 invoice 18962 8/23/2005 $1,124.18 $1,072.50 $16.25 $385.75 $288.33 $576.67 - 2417- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 19083 Cash Payment Invoice 19065 Cash Payment Invoice 19091 Cash Payment Invoice 19124 Cash Payment City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:30 AM Page 9 Current Period: August 2005 E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SILVERADO TAILLIGHT CONVERTER $198.90 8/23/2005 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #844 HUB ASSEMBLY/RADIATOR $871.39 8/23/2005 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #847 FAN MOTOR $641.16 8/23/2005 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #842 P, EMFG P/S PUMP $288.55 8/23/2005 E 101-42110-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #847 OIL CHANGE $27.45 Invoice 19240 8/23/2005 TransactiOn Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,125.07 Refer 82305 JOHNS VARIETY AND PETS Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic PLANTS $31.93 Invoice 027504 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.93 Refer 82305 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,339.37 Invoice 1938495 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $727.25 Invoice 1938496 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $548.05 Invoice 1938497 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $204.75 Invoice 1938498 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $194.50 Invoice 1938499 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $29.99 Invoice 1938500 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$56.75 Invoice 287973 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $905.27 Invoice 1941866 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $714.83 invoice 1941867 8/23~2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $59.98 Invoice 1941868 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $784.54 Invoice 1941869 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $51.70 Invoice 1941870 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $471,60 Invoice 1941871 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,985.08 Refer 82305 JUBILEE FOODS (FIRE DEPT) Cash Payment E 222-42260-430 Miscellaneous FF RIDERS $9.85 Invoice 072005 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-431 Meeting Expense FIRE COMMISSION $22,42 Invoice 072005 8/23/2005 -2418- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 8/17/2005 City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 10 Current Period: August 2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.27 Refer 82305 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 08-04-05 COUNCIL COOKIES $67.56 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 08-10-05 LIMES FOR RESALE $33.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.56 Refer 82305 JULIE ANN PHOTOGRAPHY Cash Payment E 101-41310-435 Books and Pamphlets FESTIVAL PROOF BOOKS $102.24 Invoice 0399410 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $102.24 Refer 82305 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs, SERIES 2005D TIF $7,000.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/9/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,000.00 Refer 82305 KIRK, SCOTT Cash Payment G 101-22981 2163 Fairview #04-06 Varian REIMBURSE ESCROW $118.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $118.00 Refer 82305 KUR'I-Z, JAMES Cash Payment E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense REIMBURSE ROTARY GOLF TOURNAMENT $50.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense REIMBURSE EMPLOYEE DINNER $75.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8~8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 82305 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVA TI Cash Payment E 101-41110-433 Dues and Subscriptions 3RD QTR LEVY $5,253.25 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,253.25 Refer 82305 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 08-06-05 ORDINANCE #12-2005 $39.80 Invoice 8605 8/23/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 08-06-05 PRELIMINARY PLAT $47.76 Invoice 8705 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 08-06-05 ORDINANCE #11-2005 $131.34 invoice 8805 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 08-14-05 AMEND CITY CODE $65.67 Invoice 81405 8/23/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23008 2020 Commerce Parking Lot 08-13-05 2020 INDIAN KNOLL MANOR $35.82 Invoice 81305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/9/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $320.39 Refer 82305 LANO EQUIPMENT, INCORPORA T Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair TOOTH BAR $427.70 Invoice 132571 812312005 PO 19056 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $427.70 Refer 82305 LIEVERS, STEVEN -2419- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 082305 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 11 Current Period: August 2005 G 101-23059 5115 Bartlett Blvd. #05-41 Li REIMBURSE ESCROW $500.00 8/23/2005 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.00 Refer 82305 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,235.44 Invoice 828794 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $17.60 Invoice 828795 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,754.15 Invoice 831712 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $60.80 Invoice 831713 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 101® TOtal $7,067.99 Refer 82305 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-18-05 DELIVERY CHARGE $27.00 Invoice 16094 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-21-05 DELIVERY CHARGE $107.00 Invoice 16115 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-25-05 DELIVERY CHARGE $35.00 Invoice 16123 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 07-28-05 DELIVERY CHARGE $153.00 Invoice 16152 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $322.00 Refer 82305 MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCI Cash Payment E 427-43121-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 2005 SEAL COAT PROJECT $843.50 Invoice 52109 8/23/2005 Project 06173 Cash Payment G 101-23008 2020 Commerce Parking Lot 07-05 2020 COMMERCE PARKING LOT $762.00 Invoice 52110 8/23/2005 Project 11894 Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 07-05 2355 CHATEAU WATERTOWER $714.00 Invoice 52111 8/23/2005 Project PW0506 Cash Payment E 455-43255-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 MCES LIFT STATION $480.00 Invoice 52112 8/23/2005 Project 13132 Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 07-05 WELL PUMPHOUSE $6,098.80 Invoice 52113 8/23/2005 Project 13313 Cash Payment E 401-46540-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 LOST LAKE GREENWAY $775.00 Invoice 52114 8/23/2005 Project 13566 Cash Payment E 401-43104-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 2004 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $41.25 Invoice 52115 8/23/2005 Project 14615 Cash Payment E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $153.00 Invoice 52116 8/23/2005 Project 14707 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 STORM SEWER PROJECT $1,847.00 invoice 52117 8/23/2005 Project 14956 Cash Payment E 401-43103-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 2005 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $37,209.90 Invoice 52118 8/23/2005 Project 15000 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 BAYRIDGE ROAD EASEMENT $139.00 invoice 52119 8/23/2005 Project 15127 Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 07-05 STANDPIPE DEVON LANE $2,790.60 invoice 52120 8/23/2005 Project PW0510 -2420- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 52121 Cash Payment Invoice 52122 Cash Payment Invoice 52123 Cash Payment Invoice 52124 Cash Payment City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 12 Current Period: August 2005 E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 LIFT STATION EVALUATION $2,946.50 8/23/2005 Project 15183 E 401-43110-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 2005 RETAINING WALL REPLACEMENT $9,595.00 8/23/2005 Project 15229 G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 07-05 2355 CHATEAU WATER TOWER $357.00 8/23/2005 Project PW0506 G 101-23042 5337 Shoreline #05-12 S,A. 07-05 5377 SHORELINE DRIVE #05-26 $204.00 8/23/2005 Project 15324 G 101-23057 4798 Northern #05-39 Varia 07-05 4798 NORTHERN ROAD #05-39 $102.00 Invoice 15367 Cash Payment Invoice 52126 Cash Payment Invoice 52127 Cash Payment Invoice 52128 Cash Payment Invoice 52129 Transaction Date G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 8/23/2005 E 101.42400-300 Professional Srvs 8/23/2005 E 455-46377-300 Professional Srvs 8/23/2005 G 101-23060 4539 Islandview Dr #05-42/4 8/23/2005 8/18/2005 8/23/2005 07-05 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $1,567.50 Project 15372 07-05 4712 RICHMOND ROAD Project 15375 07-05 LANDSWAP RAILROAD TIF 1-2 Project 15382 07-05 4539 ISLANDVIEW DRIVE #05-42/43 Project 15479 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $841;50 $287.00 $153.00 $67,907.55 Refer 82305 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEM Cash Payment E 101-41310-431 Meeting Expense 07-21-05 MAMA LUNCHEON MEETING $18.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18.00 Refer 82305 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIR Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 06-05 BALANCE DUE $90.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste DisposaI-MCIS 09-05 WASTEWATER $42,762.78 Invoice 804037 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42,852.78 Refer 82305 MIDWEST TRUCK AND AUTO A CC Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MISCELLANEOUS AUTO PARTS $286.84 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MISCELLANEOUS AUTO PARTS $286.84 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery MISCELLANEOUS AUTO PARTS $286.84 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $860.52 Refer 82305 MINNESOTA DEPT NATURAL RES Cash Payment E 222-42260-500 Capital Outlay FA 1986 CHEV TRUCK $900.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $900.00 Refer 82305 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE M.H.R. $750.00 Invoice R32-3430000447 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $750.00 Refer 82305 MINNESOTA PUBLISHING -2421 - CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 2643 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 13 Current Period: August 2005 E 609-49750-340 Advertising 08-05 ADVERTISING $90.00 8/23/2005 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $90.00 Cash Payment Invoice 48479 Cash Payment Invoice 48569 Cash Payment Invoice 48517 Cash Payment Invoice 48583 Refer 82305 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPA E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 07-27-05 ASPHALT EMULSION 8/23/2005 E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-02-05 GRANITE 8/23/2005 E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 07-29-05 ASPHALT EMULSION 8/23/2005 E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08~03-05 ASPHALT EMULSION 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100;226 Sign Repair Materials 08-08-05 ASPHALT EMULSION Invoice 48630 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials 08-05-05 ASPHALT EMULSION Invoice 48613 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-10-05 ASPHALT EMULSION Invoice 48479 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,853.10 Refer 82305 MINNETONKA CUSTOM HOMES Cash Payment G 101-22976 3064 Alexander #03-52 S;b- REIMBURSE ESCROW $4,8'87.50 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,867.50 Refer 82305 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 07-05 MAINTENANCE $912.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-185 Fire-Maintenance Pay 07-05 DRILLS $670.00 Invoice 082305 8/2312005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 07-05 SALARIES $3,751.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,333.00 Refer 82305 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOClA TIO Cash Payment E 895-49990-124 Fire Pens Contrib 08-05 FIRE RELIEF $9,883.33 Invoice 082308 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,883.33 Refer 82305 MOUND MARKETPLACE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals 09-05 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE $850.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/16/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $850.00 Refer 82305 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 06-30-05 BLACKTOP $250.05 Invoice 108359 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 07-01-50 BLACKTOP $83.21 Invoice 108442 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 07-05-05 BLACKTOP $85.29 Invoice 108698 8/23/2005 $287.55 $319.50 $287.55 $255.60 $i27.80 $287.55 $287.55 -2422- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 14 Current Period: August 2005 Cash Payment E 60t-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 07-14-05 BLACKTOP $229.67 Invoice 109030 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-224 Street Maint Materials 07-15-05 BLACKTOP $127.31 Invoice 190120 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 07-22-05 BLACKTOP $588.60 Invoice 109465 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-224 Street Maint Materials 07-27-05 BLACKTOP $586.23 Invoice 109818 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,950.36 Refer 82305 NATIONAL DIAMOND SUPPLY OF Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 14" ARBOR $219.39 Invoice 1052 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4i2005 Wells Fargo 10100 TOtal $219.39 Refer 82305 NATIONAL WATERWORKS Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts METERS $1,068.51 Invoice 3303848 8/23/2005 PO 19207 Cash Payment E 601-49400-22;I Equipment Parts HYD EXT $1,014.15 Invoice 2600988 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,082.66 Refer 82305 NEWMAN SIGNS _ CashPaYment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials ROUND POSTS,ETC $1,275.46 Invoice TI-0145102 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,275.46 Refer 82305 NOW MICRO Cash Payment E 101-42110-205 Computer Software WIRELESS MODEM AIR CARDS $680.00 Invoice 387992 8~23/2005 PO 19101 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo. 10100 Total $680.00 Refer 82305 NRG PROCESSING SOLLUTIONS L Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-05 LEAF/BRUSH SERVICE $50.00 Invoice 62503 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 82305 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8~23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8/23/2005 I Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8/23/2005 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES $5.39 $5.39 $5.39 $5.39 $5.39 $1.78 $3.59 -2423- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 15 Current Period: August 2005 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES PAPER,INK JET CARTRIDGE TONER CARTRIDGE KEY CABINETS INK JET CARTRIDGE MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES PAD,PRISM Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301742215-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 299714159-001 8/23/2005 PO 19104 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301575118-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 298658790-001 8/23/2005 PO 19154 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 293555138-002 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES . Invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 300782787-001 8/2312005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 300782787-001 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $579.61 Refer 82305 ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INCORPO Cash Payment E 601-49400-395 Gopher One-Call 07-05 LOCATES $155.25 invoice 5070576 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-395 Gopher One-Call 07-05 LOCATES $155.25 Invoice 5070576 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $310.50 Refer 82305 PAUL A WALRDON, ASSOC (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222-42260-308 Building Inspection Fees 07-14-05 THRU 08-11-05 INSPECTIONS $800.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $800.00 Refer 82305 PAUL A. WALDRON & ASSOCIATE Cash Payment E 101-42400-308 Building Inspection Fees 06-09-05 THRU 07-13-05 INSPECTIONS $1,270.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-308 Building Inspection Fees 06-09-05 THRU 07-13-05 INSPECTIONS $5,460.62 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-29-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $40.00 Invoice 082305 6/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,770.62 Refer 82305 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA $3.59 $200.03 $63.74 $55.56 $32.07 $26.98 $26.98 $26.98 $26.98 $26.98 $9.Ol $17.99 $17.99 $12.41 -2424- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 16 Current Period: August 2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $812.00 Invoice 8078013 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,170.00 Invoice 8075640 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $289.00 Invoice 8078669 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/11/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,271.00 Refer 82305 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $88.00 Invoice 082305 8~23~2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $88.00 Refer 82305 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $574.70 8/23/2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Cash Payment Invoice 2226253 Cash Payment WINE $1,677.40 Invoice 2226254 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $43.95 Invoice 2226255 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $344.25 Invoice 22285670 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $377.10 Invoice 2228671 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,017.40 Refer 82305 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $577.22 Invoice 586406-00 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $141.57 Invoice 586484-00 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $35.52 Invoice 589574-00 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $744.25 Invoice 589661-00 8~23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $55.11 Invoice 588811-00 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,553.67 Refer 82305 R.C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 4TH FLOOR BALLAST $144.16 Invoice 686 8/2312005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.16 Refer 82305 RAYS SERVICES Cash Payment E'602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic BAYWOOD SHORES REMOVAL $950.00 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $950.00 Refer 82305 SCHARBER AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair OIL FILTER $48.41 Invoice 02 2051028 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $48.41 -2425- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 17 Current Period: August 2005 Refer 82305 SHOREWOOD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal ClTYHALL STORM DAMAGE $934.54 Invoice 5482 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $934.54 Refer 82305 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER COMP Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay FA 05-09-05 SERVICE CALL $285.00 Invoice 60344816 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $285.00 Refer 82305 STREICHER'S Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms BADGE HOLDER $1§.00 Invoice 1283144 8/23/2005 PO 19114 Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms PATCHES $84~90 Invoice 1285062-P 8/23/2005 PO 19110 Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms HELMET STRAP $14.95 Invoice U283669 8/23/2005 PO 19114 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $117.85 Refer 82305 T-MOBILE CELL PHONE Cash Payment E 281-45210-321 Telephone & Cells 07-03-05 THRU 08-02-05 $36.54 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $36.54 Refer 82305 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $331.50 Invoice 38665 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $8,559.95 Invoice 382305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $132.40 Invoice 382304 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $63.25 Invoice 383023 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,623.30 Invoice 383024 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $323.00 invoice 38776 8/23~2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12,033.40 Refer 82305 THRIFTY WHITE DRUG STORE Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies PICTURE MAKER $7.73 Invoice 1818189 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies PHOTO PROCESSING $17.02 Invoice 1801241 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.75 Refer 82305 TOSHIBA COMPUTERS Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies TONER/TRANSFER KIT $151.92 Invoice 1113300 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $151.92 Refer 82305 TROPHIES BY LINDA Cash Payment E 101-42110-210 Operating Supplies PLAQUES $251.34 Invoice 14790 8/23/2005 PO 19105 -2426- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 8/4/2005 City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 18 Current Period: August 2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $251.34 Refer 82305 TRUE VALUE, MOUND Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $496.06 invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-220 Repair/Maint Supply 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.39 invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $228.12 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $5.63 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $9.35 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $37.16 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $30.11 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $43.48 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $32.45 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $51.91 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $2.85 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $8.19 Invoice 082305 8~23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts 07-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $9.61 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $985.31 Refer 82305 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies INK JET CARTRIDGE,PAPER CLIPS $169.48 Invoice 467663-0 8/23~2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies PAPER TOWERS $114.42 Invoice 463202-0 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies APPLICATIONS $17.85 Invoice 463729-0 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $301.75 Refer 82305 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Cash Payment E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms VEST $734.95 invoice 280056 8/23/2005 PO 19076 Transaction Date 8/15/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $734.95 Refer 82305 UNITED RENTALS Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials STOP SIGN,TUXEDO/PIPER $449.96 Invoice 50212743-001 8/23/2005 PO 19211 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $449.96 Refer 82305 VERIZON WIRELESS (FIRE~FIN) Cash Payment E 101-41500-321 Telephone & Cells 08-03-05 612-269-9058 BUSINARO,GINO $8.73 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 -2427- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 19 Current Period: August 2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 08-03-05 612-723-7560 MOUND FIRE $0.77 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Ceils 08-03-05 612-751-3572 ENGINE #18 $0.77 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 08-03-05 612-751-3573 MOUND FIRE $0.77 invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone & Cells 08-03-05 952-240-5244 HANSON $52.15 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/17/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 , Total $63.19 Refer 82305 VIDOETRONIX, INCORPORATED ' Cash Payment E 101-42110-220 Repair/Maint Supply REPAIR INTERVIEW ROOM CAMERA $150.O0 Invoice 86335 8/23/2005 PO 19106 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 Refer 82305 WHEELER'S PHOTOGRAPHY Cash Payment E 101-42110-430 Miscellaneous OFFICER REAGAN PHOTOS $42.60 Invoice 1064-5 8/23/2005 PO 19113 Transaction Date 8/12/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.60 Refer 82305 WILDERNEWSS TACTICAL PRODU Cash Payment E 101-42110-219 Safety supplies SLINGS, PLATES,ETC $400.95 Invoice 12421 8/23/2005 PO 19098 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $400.95 Refer 82305 WILLIAMS TOWING Cash Payment E 101-42110-436 Towing Charges #05-1595 TOW $164.54 invoice 48637 8/23/2005 PO 19108 Transaction Date 8~4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $164.54 Refer 82305 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$413.75 invoice 25207 8~23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$92.50 Invoice 25445 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,670.10 Invoice 131787 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/4/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,163.85 Refer 82305 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities 07-03-05 THRU 08-02-05 #51-4802601-1 $5,078.84 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities #51-6002833-7 STREET LIGHTS $142.40 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities #51-6002836-0 STREET LIGHTS $243.66 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electdc Utilities #51-6002837-1 LIFT STATIONS $2,042.52 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electdc Utilities 07-27-05 THRU 07 $196.97 Invoice 082305 8/23/2005 Transaction Date 8/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,704.39 -2428- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 427 SEAL COAT FUND 455 TIF 1-2 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND City of Mound Payments 08/18/05 11:31 AM Page 20 Current Period: August 2005 10100 Wells Fargo $78,959.72 $10,341.77 $36.54 $53,117.83 $843.50 $1,343.67 $7,000.00 $285.00 $18,055.29 $48,779.57 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $68,269:14 ..... 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $1,847.00 895 FIRE RELIEF FUND $9,883.33 $298,762.36 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $298,762.36 $298,762.36 -2429- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -2430- C H A 10:35 R T li~ R e: D From-Kennedy & Graven 670 U,$, B~nk ?h~ 200 South $;xch $cr¢¢t Minneapol{~;, MN 5540Z (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 f,x h t~p;/I v,,ww.k~nnedy-gr~ven.co m +612331'9310 T-g$2 P.002/008 F-234 ]ROtlRRT J. L~NDALL August 19, 2005 Carlton Moore Director of Public Works 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1627 Allomcy at Law Direct Dial f,612) 337-9219 MSI~ Cc~ t'iccl R.~I P]'opcl'~y Law Specialist BY EM. AIL: carltonmoore~cityolh~ound.com Request by Melxopolitan Co~mcil Envixomnental Services For Sanitary Sewer Easements From City Dear Carlton: You sent me legal descriptions and parcel sketches For two sanitary sewer m-~d utility easements which Metropolitan Council Environmental Services ("MCES") has requested thru the City provide to MCES. The easements would both permanently encumber City property, as follows: 1. Part of Lots 53, 54 and 55, Lynwold Park, part of Lot 1, Kennedy's Subdivision of'Lot 56, Lynwold Park, and part of Government Lot 8 of Section 14, Township 117, Range 24, immediately west of Commerce Blvd. (containing 12,666 square feet). Substantial portions of fi-ds proposed easement tract appear to be already bttrdcned by easements in hvor of MCES (the north 25 feet pursuant to Doc. No. 6413685) and in favor of Northern States Power (per Doc. No. 2181922 over Lot 53, Lynwold Park). 2. Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 117, Range 24, underlying the North 36 feet of to be vacated Shoreli~e Drive (Old County Road 15) lying within approximately 100 feet irmnediately west of the right-of-way line of New County Road 15. This m'ea also lles wiflfin an existing sanitary sewer easement. We recommend that the City Council adopt rite enclosed resolution authorizing tl~e Mayor and City Manager to execute the requested permanem easements in favor .of the Metropolitan Council EnvkotxmentaI Services ia form approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Please call mc if you have any questions. RJL:gak cc: l~ob Del:der John Dean Aui-lg-05 10:38 From-Kennedy & Graven T-g32 P.003/008 F-234 RESOLUTION NO. 05- AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SANITARY SEWEP,. EASEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the official gCveming body of the City of Mound; and WFIE~, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, acting by and through its City Council, is authorized by law to grant permanent easements for sanitary sewer purposes; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services ("MCES") has requested that the City grant to MCES permanent easements burdening two parcels of City owned land as follows: Parcel One: Part of Lots 53, 54, and 55, Lynwold Park; part of Lot 1, Kennedy's Subdivision of Lot 56 Lynwold Park, and part of Government Lot 8 of Section 14, Township 117, Range 24 which is described on Exhibit A attached hereto and which is depicted in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto. Parcel Two: Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T--0wnship 117, Range 24 which is described on Exhibit B attached hereto and which is depicted on Exhibit B-1 attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF MOUND IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that it is the considered judgment of the Council that the Easements be granted for the stated public purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and ~e City Manager are authorized and directed to execute and deliver such Easements to Metropolitan Council in form and sub~anee acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney. The foregoing re~olution was moved by Councilmember The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted against: Councilmember Adopted by thc City Council this __ Councilmember was absent. day of August 2005. and seconded by RJL,-267167vl MU2_20-4 ' Aui-lg-05 10:36 From-Kennedy & Graven +6123370310 T-032 P.004/008 F-234 Pat Meisel, Mayor ATTEST: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Kl'I.-2fi71§Tvl 2 IVlU220.4 Resolution 05-i17 ILt-L-2622'/Svl MU200,124 Resolution No. 05-117 RJI.,-267167v! MI J220-4 2 Resolution No. 05-117 EXHIBIT PJL.267167vl MI_r220-4 Resolution No. 05-117 t:~L.26?tt?vl 4 BARR Barr Engineering Company 4700 West 77th Street * Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952.832-2600 · Fax: 952-832-2601 · www. i~rr. com An EEO Employer Minneapolis, MN * Hibbing, MN · Duluth, MN · Ann Arbor, MI · Jefferson City, MO August 18, 2005 Carlton Moore Public Works Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Veit Application for Payment #1 Response Actions at Lost Lake Dump and Maxwell Properties City Project No. PW-05-11 On August 18, 2005, Bart received a revised Application for Payment #1 (Application No. 50538.1) from Vett & Company, Inc. (Veit) under their agreement with the City of Mound for the Response Actions at Lost Lake Dump and Maxwell Properties; City project number PW-05-11. Our review of Veit's application for payx~nt indicates that it reflects the work completed through August 17, 2005, and thorefore we recommend payment as shown on the enclosed Application for Payment #1. Please call Don Richard at (952) 832-2732 or me itt (952) 832-2690 if you have any questions in this Sincerely, Dale Kolstad, P.E. Bart Engineering Co. -2431 - -2432- ii~18 -2433- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2005 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION 330.35, Subd. 9 OF THE CITY CODE (SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AS IT RELATES TO TIMELINES FOR RECORDING OF FINAL PLATS The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 330.35 of the Subdivision Ordinance is hereby amended by amending Subdivision 9 thereof to read as follows: Subd. 9. The subdivider shall, if the final plat is signed by the Mayor and City Manager, __record the final plat with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles within 60 __days after signing. Any final plat not filed and recorded within 60 days of the date __of the Council resolutions approving the final plat, or within 60 days after the plat __is considered approved by reason of the City Council's failure to act within 60 .~ ..... ~ +~,.. ~,~,.,. ~.~ +~,,. ~I,.o, ,.,..+ ,.,..+~. +~.,. ~, ,:,,4~.... r~m,.~o, ,~r, final approval as required by state law, -shall become null and _void unless the City Council, prior to the expiration of such period, has approved an extension to the 60 day timeline= This amendment shall be applicable to all final plat approvals made within 60 days prior to the effective date of this amendment, and thereafter. Passed by the City Council this day of ,2005. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel Published in The Laker the Effective the __ day of __day of ,2005 .,2005. -2434- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Comm. Development Director DATE: August 16, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance(s) - New Single Family Home APPLICANT: Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl LOCATION: 4798 Northern Road PARCELS: 18-117-23-33-0026 ZONING: R-lA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential Summary The City Council will review a variance(s) application submitted by Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl to construct a new 2-story SFD at 4798 Northern Road. Members of the Council are advised that the application(s) were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its July 11th and August 8th meetings. July 11th Meeting Overview. The "original" application reviewed by the Commission on July 11th required the following variance(s) Required Existing I Requested Variance Front setback Side setback (west)* Side setback (east) 20 feet 19.4 feet / 10.1 feet 9.9 feet 6.0 feet 2.6 feet / 3.0 feet 3.0 feet 6.0 feet 8.7 feet / 5.0 feet 1.0 feet The Planning Commission tabled the application until its 8/11 meeting to allow the applicants to consider modification(s) to the structure so as to minimize the number of variance(s) required for the project. Staff also informed the applicants that the upper story balcony needed to be modified as it did not qualify as an allowable encroachment within the 50-foot lakeshore setback area. -2435- August 8th Meeting Overview. At its August 8th meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the "modified" application including the following revisions: The width of the proposed house was reduced from 22 feet to 21 feet so as to meet the (6) foot setback requirement. The "original" plan proposed a (5) foot setback and therefore required variance approval. · The lakeside balcony "bump out" was recessed within the structure and therefore does not extend into the lakeshore setback area. · Hardcover was reduced from 39.30 percent to 36.60 percent on the "modified" plan. DISCUSSION As depicted on the survey, the proposed new house will be located 12 feet from the north curb line of Northern Road as measured at the SW corner. The "modified" proposal requires (2) variance(s) as opposed to (3) with the "original" plan. Currently, the existing house is nonconforming on the west side, south side (front) and north (lake) side. Additionally, hardcover on the property exceeds the 40 percent allowance and the house does not meet the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The majority of the discussion focused on the location of the proposed new home from Northern Road so as to accommodate on site parking needs. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 4 in favor and 2 opposed to recommend City Council approval to allow construction of a new single-family home at 4798 Northern Road as recommended by Staff subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. -2436- 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. recommending Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. In made the following findings of fact: approval of the "modified plan" the Planning Commission 1. New structure will be meet 933.0 Regulatory Floodplain Protection Elevation (RFPE). 2. The new structure will meet the 50 foot lakeshore setback requirement. ADDITIONAL COMMENT: The City executed a 60-day extension pursuant to M.S.S. 15.99 regarding the 60-day timeline for action on the application on July 18, 2005. -2437- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 05- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE VARIANCES TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 4798 NORTHERN ROAD PLANNING CASE # 05-39 PID NO. 18-117-23-33-0026 WHEREAS, the applicants, Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl, have requested variance(s) approval to allow construction of a new single-family dwelling located at 4798 Northern Road; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 530:530, Subd. 1 states that a variance may be issued to provide relief to a landowner where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his/her property if certain circumstances exist; and WHEREAS, the property currently includes an existing single-family dwelling which is also non-conforming due to deficient setbacks and floodplain elevation. The property is also non conforming due to lot size and hardcover; and WHEREAS, the City Code requires a (20) foot front setback for principal structures in the R-lA Zoning District; a side setback(s) of 6 feet on each side and (50) foot lakeshore setback for "lots of record"; and WHEREAS, the application, as originally submitted, required the following variances: Required Existinq / Requested Variance Front setback Side setback (west)* Side setback (east) 20feet 19.4feet/lO.1 feet 9.9feet 6.0 feet 2.6 feet / 3.0 feet 3.0 feet 6.0 feet 8.7 feet / 5.0 feet 1.0 feet -2438- WHEREAS, the application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its July 11,2005 meeting who tabled the application to the August 8, 2005 meeting so as to allow the applicants the opportunity to consider modifications to the proposal to minimize the number of variances required for the project and to address the lakeside balcony as the structure did not qualify as an allowable encroachment within the lakeshore setback area; and WHEREAS, the applicants submitted a "modified" application which was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 8, 2005 meeting. The modifications are summarized as follows: ao The width of the proposed house was reduced from 22 feet to 21 feet so as to meet the (6) foot setback requirement. The "original" plan proposed a (5) foot setback and therefore required variance approval. b. The lakeside balcony "bump out" was recessed within the structure and therefore does not extend into the lakeshore setback area. c. Hardcover was reduced from 39.30 percent to 36.60 percent on the "modified" plan. WHEREAS, the "modified" plan requires the following variance(s): Required Existing / Requested Variance Front setback Side setback (west) 20 feet 19.4 feet / 10.1 feet 9.9 feet 6.0 feet 2.6 feet / 3.0 feet 3.0 feet WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the request was reviewed by the Planning Commission as required by the City Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended variance(s) approval of for the "modified plan" submitted for the property by the applicants subject to the conditions recommended by Staff. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Council does hereby approve the requested variance(s) for the "modified plan" as referenced above subject to the following conditions: -2439- A. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use requests. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. C. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. D. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. Applicant shall be responsible for preparation of a foundation survey and as-built survey prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy per City policy. 2. In approving the requested variance(s), the City Council makes the makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed new structure will meet the 50-foot lakeshore setback requirement. B. The number of variances associated with the existing structure is reduced from (4) to (2). Co Hardcover on the subject property will meet the 40 percent allowance for "lots of record." Existing hardcover on the property currently exceeds the maximum allowance. D° The new house will meet the 933.0 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE.) The lowest floor of the existing house is below the RFPE. If the house was to be constructed with a conforming front setback of (20) feet, a variance to the lakeshore setback regulations would likely be needed. F. The subject property is approximately ¼ of the required 6000 SF lot size. G. The number of variances for the project has been minimized. H. The proposed location of the house on the lakeside keeps it "in line" with the neighboring homes. -2440- q I. The criteria for granting a variance as set forth in City Code Chapter 350:530 have been met. This variance is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: See Exhibit A. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording. A building permit for the subject construction shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The variance is valid for one (1) year following its approval unless an extension is approved by the City Council pursuant to the City Code 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved and seconded by Councilmember by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted August 23, 2005 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2441 - MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 8, 2005 CASE ~q)5-39 - Continued from July '11th VARIANCES- 4798 NORTHERN ROAD BRAD AND JENNIFER TOTORITIS-SEARL The Planning Commission previously tabled the application to allow the applicant to consider modification to minimize the number of variances. The plan has been modified as follows: 1. The width of the house was reduced from 22 feet to 21 feet to meet the 6 foot setback requirement. 2. The lakeside balcony "bump out" was recessed within the structure and does not extend into the lakeshore setback area. 3. Proposed hardcover was reduced from 39.3 percent to 36.6 percent. Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. Osmek questioned the roadside setback and was concerned that the cantilever idea wasn't integrated into the new plan. Brad Totoritis (homeowner) further explained the changes in the plan. MOTION by Osmek, second by Michael, to approve staff recommendation with an additional 2 foot setback on the front. The Commission discussed the need for 2 car storage in the driveway. Smith clarified that the code requires 2 parking spaces and is non-specific whether they be inside or outside. Osmek withdrew the motion. MOTION by Ayaz, seconded by Glister, to approve staff recommendation. -2442- Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2005 Burma tends to agree with the Smith's recommendation and feels it is important to look at improvements to the neighborhood. The garage is minimal as is the home interior on that floor. Burma is in favor of approval. MOTION approved. For: Glister, Michael, Burma, Ayaz. Opposed: Hasse, Osmek Findings of Fact: Floodplain improvement, setback on lakeside. 2 -2443- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 11, 2005 CASE ~q)5-39 VARIANCE - SINGLE FAMILY HOME 4798 NORTHERN ROAD - BRAD AND JENNIFER TOTORITIS-SEARL Osmek noted that there was no deck on the structure. Applicants Jennifer and Brad Totoritis-Searl - There is a very limited deck planned off the 2nd story. Michael asked if the lot is big enough to support a home. This is a plan to overbuild the lot. Mueller reviewed the history of this section of Northern Road. There were 4 houses east that went down and redeveloped as 3 lots. Ayaz felt.that the house is_too big for the !_nt. and that it co,J!d be-built a !:."tJe smaller. Minimize and/or eliminate one or more of variances; increase length of ddveway (cantilever 2nd floor over the garage or shorten house). MOTION by Osmek, seconded by $chwingler, to table the application until August 8. MOTION approved unanimously. -2444- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT ADDENDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Comm. Development Director ............... ~ATEi~Ugust 31 2U05 SUBJECT: Variance(s) - New Single Family Home APPLICANT: Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl LOCATION: 4798 Northern Road PARCELS: 18-117-23-33-0026 ZONING: R-lA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND At its July 11"~ meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed an application from Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl requesting variance(s) approval to construct a new 2-story SFD at 4798 Northern Road. The requested variance(s) associated with the original proposal are outlined as follows: Required Existing / Requested Variance Front setback Side setback (west)* Side setback (east) 20 feet 19.4 feet/10.1 feet 9.9 feet 6.0 feet 2.6 feet / 3.0 feet 3.0 feet 6.0 feet 8.7 feet / 5.0 feet 1.0 feet The Planning Commission tabled the application to allow the applicants to consider modification(s) to the structure so as to minimize the number of variance(s) required for the project. Staff also advised that the upper story balcony needs to be addressed as it is does not appear it is an allowable encroachment within the 50-foot lakeshore setback area. -2445- DISCUSSION 1. The applicants have modified the proposal as follows: The width of the proposed house was reduced from 22 feet to 21 feet so as to meet the (6) foot setback requirement. The original plan proposed a (5) foot setback and therefore required variance approval. · Lakeside balcony "bump out" was recessed within the structure and therefore does not extend into the lakeshore setback area. "Hard'Cover (as ProPosed) was redUCed from 39.30 percent to 36.60 percent. As depicted on the survey, the proposed new house will be located 12 feet from the north curb line of Northern Road as measured at the SW corner. The City executed a 60-day extension pursuant to M.S.S. 15.99 regarding the 60-day timeline for action on the application on July 18, 2005. Details regarding the original proposal is referenced in Planning Report No. 05-39 which was included in the July 11th PC agenda. Commission members are reminded to bring their 7/11 packet to the meeting. The modified proposal requires (2) variance(s) as opposed to (3) with the original plan. Currently, the existing house is nonconforming on the west side, south side (front) and north (lake) side. Additionally, hardcover exceeds the 40 percent allowance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council to allow construction of a new single-family home at 4798 Northern Road subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance(s) application is approved. 3. Applicant shall be required to submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. -2446- 4. Applicant shall be respOnsible for procurement of any and/or all permits. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission at its August 8th August 8*h meeting, it is anticipated that the application will be forwarded to the City Council for review at its August 23, 2005 meeting. -2447- CERTIFICATE OF Prepared For: N LEC.4Z DESORIP~ON.' t~es! Half of Lot R,~. SuL~'r~/bn of Lots 0 Denotes ~7on monument ~ Denotes found monument x OODO Denotes eXl~tl~g elevation Denotes surface drainage Proposed Slab on Grade Ele va t~'~ n--BZ~. 5 P~oposed Top of Block Ele vo tio n-- gJ~. 0 Benchmark.' Top Hut of Hydrant rnarSed ~M", ,lev. = 9J4.88 REVISED: 5[17[05 house REUSED: 7[25[05 house EXISTING HARDCOVER House 639..~ Sq. Ft. Pot~os & Decks 439 Sq,Ft. Conc. Walks & Drfve 287 Sq, Ft. Carport 280 Sq,Ft, Total Hordcover 1,645.4 Sq. Ft. Existing Parcel Area = 3,346.22 Sq. Ft ~ of Hordcover = 49.17 ~ PROPOS-CD HARDCOVER ~' '~e~.~ . -_~ , ': ~ZZ,~.. ' . House 966 Sq.F~ A,/~,,.~; ~ ~ ~..,~-~'::.:.'~. Cone. Walks ~ Drive 259 Sq~Ft' /F~ ~ ~ ~: .'-~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... -~" ' I *~ ~{_ ' ~ ~/~ ' ' ~'~"~o~.~..-' - ~ Total Hardcover 1,225 Sq Vt ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ) ~?s~ing Parcel Area = ~.~46.22 Sq. "~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ of Hordcover = ~6 60 ~ ~ (PROPOS~i;ED) N~ 11 I he,by ceHi~ that thi, su~o, ~po~ was p~po~d by me or under [ I my direr supe~i~ion and fhot I om o'.duly R~iste~d Land Su~eyor under the I 12798 5050 Harbor Lone No. I ~ ~me this 22nd day of ~ril, 2005. ~ 429/~1 Plymouth, MN 55447 I ._ _j -2450- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: July 6, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance Request- New Single Family Dwelling OWNER I APPLICANT: Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 05-39 LOCATION: 4798 Northern Road 71'~lklll~l~· I~.IA .qinnln-~nmilv I~nnidnntinl COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential PROJECT DETAILS The applicant proposes to demolish the existing 18' x 32' house and construct a new 2-story residential dwelling with a building footprint of 22' x 48' (1056 SF). The structure would be accessed from and would front Northern Road. The new house includes a lower level garage on the south side which faces Northern Road. The requested variances are outlined as follows: Required Existing Proposed Variance Front setback Side setback (west)* Side setback (east) (20) feet (19.4) feet (10.1) feet (9.9) feet (6.0) feet (2.6) feet (3.0) feet (3.0) feet (6.0) feet (8.7) feet (5.0) feet (1.0) foot Note: As measured from the existing house. There is an existing deck located on the west side that is located within the required side and front setback area(s) -2451 - SITE CONDITIONS Subject Property. The existing house, which is proposed to be demolished, includes several nonconforming conditions including deficient front, lakeshore and west side setbacks. There also is existing single-car carport which fronts Northern Road which is nonconforming which will be removed. Additionally, there are several nonconforming conditions associated with the property including but not_ limited to excessive hardcoveranddeflcient lot size ISSUES ANALYSIS Ordinary High Water Elevation. The Ordinary High Water (OHW) elevation for Lake Minnetonka is 929.4 Floodplain. Required Elevation. The Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) for the City of Mound is 933.00. Floodplain regulations require that the lowest floor of all structures including basements and crawl spaces must be constructed at or above the RFPE. Fill / Compensation. City Code Chapter 300.13, Subd 4 (b) states that the placement of fill in the flood fringe shall result in a no-net decrease in 100- year flood storage. In the event the floodplain compensation cannot-be accommodated on-site, it must be accomplished on the same waterbody and in an appropriate location approved by the City. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Please refer to the Certificate of Survey prepared by Demars Gabriel dated April 22, 2005 (revised 5/17/05) which has been included as an attachment. Please note that the scale is incorrectly noted on the document and should read as follows: 1 inch equals 10 feet. 60-DAY PROCESS The application was received and deemed to be complete on or about May 24, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. -2452- PUBLIC AGENCY PERMITTING ISSUES A copy of the request and all supporting materials was forwarded to the DNR for review and comment. No comments have been received. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around July 6, 2005 to inform them of the variance request. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Building Official Residential structures located less than (3) feet from a property line must include fire rated walls. Building permit application required. Applicant to submit all required information including (2) sets of complete building blueprints, foundation plan, main floor, upper level, cross sections, etc. City Engineer See attached email from MFRA City of Mound Engineer Bob Dehler dated July 6, 2005. Parks Supt. No comments or objections Police Chief No comments or objections. Planning/Engineering Tech The constructed portion of Northern Road Is approximately 16 feet (face to face). Guest parking occurs on the south side of Northern Road. Public Works Supt. The "northern" portion of Northern Road was previously vacated. The ROW for Northern Road in front of the subject property is 20 feet. Snow is generally stored on the south side of Northern Road but is also hauled out when westbound trucks are exiting. -2453- Fire Chief Refer to email dated July 7, 2005 which has been included as an attachment. SITE VISIT Members of the Planning Commission and City Council are encouraged to visit the subject property prior to the meeting. DISCUSSION i' The pr0-%~y fr°nts N0~hern Road on the sOUth side and Lake ...................... ~Vlinnetonka~ n~the-nort h-side~ 2. The lot is approximately ¼ of the required 6000 SF lot size. o Minimum lot width and frontage is 40 feet in the R-lA District. The subject property measures 30.13 feet at the street and approximately 30 (+/-) feet at the 20 foot setback line. In order for the house to be constructed with a conforming front setback, a variance to the 50-foot lakeshore setback would needed. Extending the structure towards the lake may also impact the floodplain which requires compensation. Additionally, pushing the house further towards the lake may create additional hardcover. The proposed location of the house on the lakeside keeps 'the proposed new dwelling "in line" with the neighboring houses. -2454- Portion(s) of the subject property is located within the 100-year floodplain (931.0 elevation). Any grading and/or filling activities at or below the 931.0 elevation requires approval of a floodplain alteration permit by the Council which is not part of the current application. The minimum elevation for structures in Mound is 933.0. As proposed, the proposed slab on grade elevation is 932.5 and proposed top of block is 933.0. The lowest floor of the structure (including crawl space) will need to be at or above the 933.0 elevation. 7 A roximatel ¼ of the sub. j_ect lot is located within the 50 foot lakeshore ........................ PP Y_ ....................................................... setback area. The proposal, as submitted, reduces hardcover from 49.17 percent to 39.30 percent which is within the 40 percent allowance for "lots of record." 9. A sideloaded garage is problematic on this property due to the 30 foot width of the lot. 10. As proposed, there would-be approximately i 0-i2 fee[ in [he [run[ of [he proPosed new house aVailable for parking. 11.The proposed improvements will visually enhance the property as well as the surrounding neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the variance as requested with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all fees associated with the variance request. 2. Hardcover for the subject site shall not exceed (40) percent. 3. Grading and drainage plans shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the building permit. The applicant shall be responsible for all permitting issues including but not limited to, issuance/approval of a floodplain alteration permit (if applicable.) 5. Any and/or all comments from the City Engineer including the placement of fill. 6. The lowest floor of the proposed new structure Shall meet the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) of 933. -2455- CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the variance application .is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at its July 26, 2005 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at its July 11,2005 meeting. -2456- VARIANCE PROPER~ LEGAL Lot ~t "'~[.~ ~ bec ~ Block APPLICANT N~me (IF OTHER Address THAN OWNER) Phone (H) (W) Fax .... APPLICATION 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55304 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date ~bL{l~ j j Case No. ~'"'~c:~ City Council Date ~'~J g) '~-~ Please htpe or print legibly Has an application ever been marie for zoning, vanance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (~/). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Variance Application Page I of 3 Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): -2457- 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area. height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning . district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (~. If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or exisUng) Front Y~-r-~---(-l~! S E W ) ft. ft. . ft, Side Yard: ( N S~CV) ~ ft. _,6 ft. I Side Yard: (N S E {~ ~ ft. ~ ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W ) ft. ft. Lakeside: ( N S E W ) 50 ft. 5 0 ft. · (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. street Frontage: ~-, 0 ~t. Io,i '11.01 ft. C[, q ff. Lot Size: ~ i000 sq ft '"~1 ~ L.{ ~ sq ft .) .sq ft Hardcover: l¢r~5 ~ I ,3'5~ sqft I, ~)15 sqff sqff 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (~, No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reaSonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? (~"too narrow (J/too small (vY'too shallow Please describe: ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) drainage (v,)~xisting situation ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Variance Application Page 2 of 3 -2458- Case No. (~__,--~C~ 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyo. ne having property interests in the land _ afl, r .the zoning ordjn_an_ce___w_as_adopjed_. (!.982)? Yes_(_),.~Lf yes,_explaJn; 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? 8. Are the conditions Of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (V~, No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature ~-,~'~ "'~ Applicant's Signature Variance Application Page 3 of 3 Date Date -2459- Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: "Robert Dehler" <bdehter@mfra.com> To: "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 06~ 200§ 2:32 PM ......................... Subject: 4798 Northern Road Sarah, Please see my following comments on 4798 Northern Road. -,~Additional-infor-rnation-on-grading-and proposed-houseelevationswillbe required4~4th-thebuildin.~ permit. Existing lot is flat. A 3% minimum grade on the driveway is recommended. · Drainage an0 Utility easements will apply: · Drainage from this property must remain on this property and not neighboring properties · Construction is not allowed 50' from the 929.4 contour. · Water and sewer services typically are not allowed in the driveway. Water and sewer service locations to be approved by Mound Public Works department. Robert Dehler, P.E. McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 763 476-6010 Fax: 763 476-8532 bdehler~mfra.com -2460- 7/6/2005 This information sheet only summarizes a portiOn of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinance. For further information, contact the City of Mound Planning Department at 472-0600. R-lA Zoning General ,Zoning Information Sheet District- Single Family Residential PRINCIPAL BUILDINGS - Lot Areat Lot Widthr and Setback .Requirements: Minimum Lot Area ..................................... 6,000 square feet Minimum Lot Width ............................................ 40 feet Front Yard Setback ............................................ 20 feet Side Yard Setback .......................................... ~ . 10 feet* Rear Yard Setback ............................................ 1 5 feeT* Minimum'- Lot Depth '.-' :-; -, ..... - ;--;--;'. .... -..' v -;". ...... 7:-.-; .... ¥ ':'-: -Tv,... 80-f~et Lakeshore / Ordinary High Water Setback ............................. 50 feet Minimum Floor Area Requirement: ........................... 840 square feet Minimum lot frontage on an improved public street shall be 40 feet, except that lots fronting on a cul-de-sac shall be 40 feet at the front building setback line (i.e. 20 feet back from front property line). *Applicable side or rear yard setbacks apply to lot lines abut'ring fire lanes or alleys not exceeding 1 5 feet in width. Building Height: Maximum 2Y2 stories or thirty-five'"'(~35')' f~et in height. Building Height is defined as "the vertical distance to be measured from the average grade of a building line to the top, to the cornice of a flat roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the highest wall of a shed roof, 'o the uppermost point on a round or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a 4tched or hip roof." LOTS OF RECORD - Special Provisions: Corner Lots: lot v~idth minimum side yard setback 40 - 50 feet 10 feet 51 - 80 feet 20 feet 81.feet or more 30 feet Side Yard Setback Requirements: Side yard setbacks for 18~s of record shall be six (6) feet unless the structure or site does not contain a garage in which case, one side yard setback is required to be ten (10) feet to accommodate a driveway access. HARDCOVER REQUIREMENTS: Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. On existing lots of record*, impervious coverage may be permitted by a maximum of 40 percent providing that techniques are utilized as identified in Section 350:1225, Subd. 6.B.1. Impervious cover is any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water or surface moisture, including all buildings, ys and parking areas whether paved or not, tennis courts, sidewalks, patios and swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum opening between boards shall not be counted in impervious cover calculations. Rev. 3/97 -2461 - Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 U Hennepin County, MN ~'r/'~s~ ~ Property Information Search Result ........... B-~t The Hen'nepin~se is updal Search By: daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m. (CS1 Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2005 Crick Here for the 2005 State Cop3d to be used when_filing_fo_E the 2004 M-I~ HOUSE or BUZLD:[NG #: 4798 STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters) L I IUI U It:~l I I Property ZD: 'Address: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: UNZT # (if applicable) 20 ~: records per page 18-117-23-33-0026 4798 NORTHERN RD MOUND 277 3 Construction year: 1 Approx. Parcel Size: 3 B W SEARL & ] S TOTOR[TTS BRADLEY SEARL JENNIFER TOTOR[TTS 4798 NORTHERN RD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Information Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and are not arms-length transactions. Sale Date: 3uly, 2002 Sale Price: $240,000 Transaction Type: Warranty Deed Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: SUBD SKARP L~NDQUIST RAVEN-LOT I & 32 027 W 1/2 OF LOT 27 Abstract or Torrens: ABSTRACT Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 20( Values Established by Assessor as of January 2,; Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: $214,000 $171,900 $171,900 $1,831.09 $27.41 h~p:l/www2.co.hennepin.mn.uslpinsladdrresult.jsp -2462- 7/712005 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 2 of 2 Total Tax: $1,858.50 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2~ Values Established by Assessor as of 3anuary 2,; Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Land Limited Building Limited Values: $189,000 $25,000 Total Market: $214,000 $151,800 $2O, lOO Total Lin~it~l; .~-~i nnn (~ualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status RESIDENTZAL LAKE SHORE HOMESTEAD 3311 Hennepin County is providin9 this information as a public service. Tax related questions: ta×info@co.hennepin.mn.us Need help locating a property on our site? Check out our Search Tips Home [ Your County Government [ Licenses, Certificates, & Registration_ I _E_mployment & Volu Social Services { Law, Public Safety, & Courts { Environment, Property, & Transportation Copyright © 2004 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepin.us AccessibiliW Policy I Contact Henne_pin County I Security/Privacy Statement_ httP://www2.co, hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresult.jsp * -2463- 7/7/2005 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 1 Hennepin County, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info Last update: 6/6/2005 at 1:00 PM READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612) 348-2618 or via e-mail at Bob. Moulder@co. hennepin, mn. us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation. Copyright © 2004 Hennepin County http://www19~c~~hennepin~mn~us/scripts/esrimap~d~~?name=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALUE=181-~~ 7/7/2005 -2464- Page 1 of 2 Sarah Smith "Greg Pederson" <chiefl@moundfire.com> To: "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> Sent: Thursday, July 0~,...2_0Q~ 11:48 AM Subject: RE: Variance -4798 Northern I have the application and drawings for this request. It appears as though the distanCes between structures on both sides are relatively small, one (east side) at about 10.3 ft. The other (west side) is about 13.4 ft. My comments: 1). While the narrow "access way" between the structures is not ideal for flrefiqhting, the 10 ft. and 13 ft accesses will allow us to get through and gain access to the front/lake side of these houses. There is NO specific minimum dimension for djst. ances be__~_een residential-qtr"nbjres called nnt in the Fire Code. Does the c!ty. building code ~.!1 out a minimum distance between structures? 2). There are a couple of fireflghting concerns: A). There is a risk of fire exposure when residences are this close to each other. One structure that is on fire can spread to another structure much more easily, thus the fire rated wall construction requirement. I recommend the fire rated wall requirement for sure. B). Laddering the sides of these houses becomes more difficult when they are this close together due to the lack of room for firefighters to work. We can work within this limited space but it is far from ideal. I~1,, ^.:.1^. ;~ lh-~* ~,t~ ,--an ~nrlt ~ith thle nrnnneol h~f ehn~lrt nnfc~ th~ ~hn~tta fir~fitahfinn r, nnt-~arn~ ('~fh~ar obstructions between these houses should be kept to an absolute minimum, i.e. fencing, shrubs, trees, etc. GSP Chief Pederson Mound Fire Chief (952) 472-3533 Direct (952) 472-3555 Main (952) 472-3775 Fax gpederson @_m_o u ~_d~re ._co..._m_ -2465- C£RTIHCATE OF SURLY Prepongd Fo~ ~30.I LEGAL DESCt?IPI70~: lYes/HaY of Lot 27, Su~n of Lots , and Z2, Ska~ and Z~d~u~fs Rav~d ~ D~no~ ~on monum~n~ ~ Denotes found monument {000~ Denotes proposed elevat[o~ ~ Denotes surface drainage Proposed Slab on Grade ~-Ie va tio n --~32. ~ Proposed Top of Bloc~ .r .~ Lt. ~ ~-Ievat[on ----$~Y~. 0 Benchmark.. Fop Nuf of Hydrant ~.~,'.~,,:,~.? marked ~M*. clay, = RJd. 88 R~:VISED: 5/17/05 ho~se EXISTING House Patios & Decks Conc. Walks & Drive Carport Total HordcoYer Existing Parcel, Area ~ of Hordcover PROPOEED House HARDOOVER 639.4 Sq. Ft. 439 Sq. Ft. 287 Sq. Ft. 2~o sq.~t. 1,645.4 Sq. Ft. 3,346.22 Sq, Ft ~g. 17 % HARDCOVER 1056 Sq. Ft. Conc. Walks & Drive 259 Sq. Ft. ~ --- ~ ~ '~ ,.:,~:~,,~?~ . · ....... Total Hordcover 1,315 Sq Ft ~ ~'~ a-.--~. ~ , ~ '~?;'::"Z~:" '- '~is[ing Parcel Area = ~,~46.22 Sq. FL -- _~ .... .~.~,.j ~ ...... _.. -~ -,, - ~ ' -_ · (PROPOSED) -' ' ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ [ I he. by ce~ify that this $u~ey,"~lon o~epo~ was p~pored by ~e or u~dee I ~~~ J ~y dl~cf aupe~ion and that I~ o du~'Regiate~d Lon~ Su~e~r under fhe I Lows of fhe Slate of Mlnnesofo -- 3050 Harbor Lone No. I ~ su~eyed by me ~his 22nd doN of ~ril, 2005. [ 42g/31 PlymoUth, MN 55~7 I ~~ = I Phone:(763) 559-0908 [ ~' ~~ · ~ - ~ DaSd ~. Crook Minn. Reg, No. 22414 / 1 "=~' ' -2466- -2467- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY Date of Use Area to be Used Time Intended Use Expected Attendance Telephone No. Home.~.5'2 -,q.77_.- _'~7xZ"~_,D Work: Drivers License Number 'Park Dept. -2469- 2470- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 4, 2005 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit / Variance(s) - Indian Knoll Parking Lot Expansion APPLICANT: City of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) ADDRESS: 2020 Commerce Boulevard PLANNING CASE NUMBER: PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0030 ZONING: R-3 Multiple-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY The City Council will hold a public hearing to review the request from Public Works Director Carlton Moore (on behalf of the Mound HRA) for a Conditional Use Permit to expand the parking lot associated with the Indian Knoll Apartment Complex located at 2020 Commerce Boulevard. According to City Code Chapter 350.640, multiple dwelling unit structures over six (6) units are a conditional use in the R-3 District. Multiple family dwellings are defined in City Code Chapter 350.310, Subd. 46 as follows: "A building designed exclusively for or occupied exclusively by three (3) or more families living independently of each other." Variance approval is also requested to allow hardcover exceeding 40 percent, to address the deficient parking lot count (exterior) and to allow a proposed (24) foot parking lot drive aisle. Construction on the proposed parking lot project is expected to begin this summer and is scheduled to be completed by September 2005 and will add (19) stalls to the parking inventory at Indian Knoll which currently includes (21) spaces and (2) handicapped stalls. Details regarding the project are contained in Planning Report No. 05-52 which has been included as an attachment. -2471 - PUBLICATION REQUIREMENTS City Code Chapter 350.535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. Members of the Council are advised that the public hearing notice was published in the Laker on August 13th and also mailed to all property owners within (350)feet on or around August 12"'. Therefore, all publication and mailing requirements have been satisfied. PLANNING COMMISSION OVERVIEW. Details regarding the Planning Commission's review of the CUP are included in the August 8t~ meeting minute excerpts which have been included as an attachment. In general, the Planning Commission was favorable to the CUP and variance requests and unanimously voted to recommend approval subject to conditions as recommended by Staff. Specific discussion focused on the need for a fence along the northeast property line so as to screen the use from the adjacent home(s) and the removal of the SE parking stall so as to maintain the required 10-foot setback. The Commission agreed that the parking lot fencing provisions do not appear to be appropriate for the remaining areas(s) as it would have no direct benefit and/or impact. A draft resolution has been prepared for review and consideration by the City Council. -2472- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 05- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW PARKING LOT EXPANSION AT INDIAN KNOLL APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED AT 2020 COMMERCE BOULEVARD PLANNING CASE NO. 05-52 PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0030 WHEREAS, the applicant, Public Works Director Carlton Moore (on behalf of the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority), has submitted a conditional use permit application to expand the parking lot at 2020 Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned R-3 Multiple Family Residential; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Chapter 350.640, multiple dwelling unit structures over six (6) units are a conditional use in the R-3 District; and WHEREAS, multiple family dwellings are defined in City Code Chapter 350.310, Subd. 46 as follows: "A building designed exclusively for or occupied exclusively by three (3) or more families living independently of each other." WHEREAS, variance approval is also requested to allow hardcover exceeding 40 percent, to address the deficient parking lot count in the outdoor lot, to allow a proposed (24) foot parking lot drive aisle and to waive the parking lot fencing provision(s) in certain area(s); and -2473- WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 350.525, Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting a conditional use permit and generally states that the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed land use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350.530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 350.525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permits are reviewed by the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the application(s) were reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 8, 2005 meeting who recommended Council approval of the CUP and variance(s) as requested subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 350.535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the planning agency and/or governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for conditional use permits and further requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is also mailed to all property owners within (350) feet; and WHEREAS, all publication and mailing requirements for the public hearing pursuant to the City Code and state statute have been satisfied. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the Conditional Use Permit to expand the parking lot at Indian Knoll Apartment complex as the proposal meets the provisions set forth in City Code Chapter 350. 525, Subd. 1. 2. The City does hereby approve the requested variance(s) associated with the parking lot expansion project as follows: a. Parking stall count variance to allow (41) spaces all of which will be located outdoors. -2474- bo Drive aisle variance to allow (24) foot width as allowed in City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 3 (A). Hardcover variance to exceed 40 percent allowance for lots of record. Variance to waive parking lot fencing provisions per City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 3 with exception of northeast side of the new parking lot. 3. In approving the requested variance(s), the City. makes the following findings: do e° The existing complex does not meet the parking stall requirement per City Code. The additional spaces to be constructed with the project will bring the facility closer into compliance with the parking provisions. The proposed stall size meets the current zoning ordinance provisions. A parking stall variance was previously granted in 1970 which allowed the construction of (16) stalls. The 24 foot drive aisle is consistent with the commercial parking lot provisions in the City Code. Off-street parking is not allowed on Commerce Boulevard. Requests for on street parking on the north/south sides along Balsam Road were previously turned down. The Conditional Use Permit and variance(s) are approved subject to the following conditions: a. The City shall be responsible for all required permitting activities. All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. c. Additional comments from the Planning Commission, City Council and Staff. -2475- A fence be installed in accordance with City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 2 (D) along the northeast side of the new parking area. Fencing requirements are waived in other area(s). Co The fence shall be supplemented by trees, as appropriate, so as to provide all season screening. Screening / planting plan to be subject to review and approval by Community Development Director and Public Works Director. The design is modified to meet the setback for R-3 parking spaces which cannot be located within (10) feet from any adjacent lot. Specifically, the SE stall must be removed. This Conditional Use Permit and variance(s) are approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: See Exhibit A 6. The variance(s) shall expire after one (1) year unless an eXtension is granted pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:530, Subd. 2 (E). The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted August 23, 2005 -2476- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 2005 CASE ~q)5-52 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INDIAN KNOLL PARKING LOT EXPANSION - 2020 COMMERCE BLVD CITY OF MOUND An apPlication for a Conditional Use Permit to expand the parking lot associated with the Indian Knoll Apartment Complex. According to City Code, multiple dwelling unit structures over 6 units are a conditional use in the R-3 District. Variance approval is also requested to allow hardcover exceeding 40 percent, to address the deficient parking lot county (exterior) and to allow a proposed 24 foot parking lot drive aisle. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Variances subject to the following conditions: 1. The City shall be responsible for all required permitting activities. 2. All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. 3. Additional comments from the Planning Commission, City Council and Staff. 4. A fence be installed in accordance with City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 2 (D) unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Commission and City Council. 5. The design is modified to meet the setback for R-3 parking spaces that cannot be located within 10 feet from any adjacent lot. 6. Parking stall count variance shall allow (42) parking stalls, all of which are located outdoors. 7. Drive aisle variance to allow (24) foot width as allowed in City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 3 (A). 8. Hardcover variance to exceed 40 percent allowance for lots of record. Consensus was that the fence needs to be installed along the northeast line of the new parking area and that the southern most parking stall should be eliminated because of the proximity to the lot line. Burma agreed with the need for a fence and felt that the stall size should remain 10 x 20 feet. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Ayaz, to approve Staff recommendation. Item #4 will read a fence shall be installed along the northeast side of the new parking area. Item #6 (above) shall read (41) parking stalls (instead of 42) Mueller (in his absence) indicated a need for a buffer to the east and was not in favor of -2477- Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2005 the project. Ellen Gomoll (5500 Breezy Road) said the project does impact them; part of what they like is the privacy of the woods behind; they are concerned about the removal of trees and would like trees in addition to the fence. Ayaz was in favor of the the tree/fence combination. Ellen Gomoll has a woodworking business and will be building a woodworking shop and wants an ac, cess way to the back of their lot as it has been in the past. Staff indicated that it will be considered. MOTION approved unanimously. 2 -2478- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472,3190 PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah $mith, Community Development Director DATE: August 4, 2005 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit - Indian Knoll Parking Lot Expansion APPLICANT: City of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) ADDRESS: 2020 Commerce Boulevard PLANNING CASE NUMBER: PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0030 ZONING: R-3 Multiple-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY Public Works Director Carlton Moore, on behalf of the City of Mound HRA, has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to expand the parking lot associated with the Indian Knoll Apartment Complex located at 2020 Commerce Boulevard. According to City Code Chapter 350.640, multiple dwelling unit structures over six (6) units are a conditional use in the R-3 District. Multiple family dwellings are defined in City Code Chapter 350.310, Subd. 46 as follows: "A building designed exclusively for or occupied exclusively by three (3) or more families living independently of each other." Variance approval is also requested to allow hardcover exceeding 40 percent, to address the deficient parking lot' count (exterior) and to allow a proposed (24) foot parking lot drive aisle. PROJECT DETAILS Construction on the proposed parking lot project is expected to begin this summer and is scheduled to be completed by September 2005 and will add (19) stalls to the parking inventory at Indian Knoll which currently includes (21) spaces and (2) handicapped stalls. -2479- Specific details regarding the project are outlined in the application and project plans that have been provided and prepared by MFRA. City Engineer Bob Dehler and Public Works Director Carlton Moore are serving as Project Managers for the parking lot project in cooperation with Westport Properties. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA In granting a conditional use permit, the City Council shall consider the advice and recommendations of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed land use upon the health, safety, morals and general welfare of occupants of surrounding lands. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the conditional use permit review criteria are contained in City Code Chapter 350.525 Subd. 1. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 350:530 Subd. 1 outlines the criteria for granting variances in the City of Mound and generally states that a variance to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance may be issued to provide relief to the landowner in those areas where the ordinance imposes undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of his or her land. CUP REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Chapter 350.525 Subd. 3 (B) requires that all requests for conditional use permits are reviewed by the Planning Commission. Additionally, City Code Chapter 350.535 Subd. 3 (C) requires that a public hearing is held by the City Council. Procedurally, state statute requires that the planning agency and/or governing body must hold a public hearing on all requests for conditional use permits and further requires that a Notice of Public Hearing is published at least (10) days in advance of the public hearing and is alsO mailed to all property owners within (350) feet. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the City Council public hearing is tentatively scheduled to be held on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 subject to the publication and mailing requirements. 60-DAY PROCESS The conditional use permit was received and deemed to be complete on or around July 26, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. NOTIFICATION City policy requires that abutting property owners are notified of land use requests by mailed notice. This activity was completed on or around August 4th. -2480- ISSUES ANALYSIS Zoning. The subject site is zoned R-3 Multiple Family Residential and subject to the provisions of City Code Chapter 350.635. The purpose R-3 District is intended to provide districts which allow multiple family dwellings where property relationship to other land uses and adequate transportation exists. According to the City Code, multiple family structures (over 6 units) are allowed by conditional use. Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map included in the Mound Comprehensive Plan guides the property for future residential use. Landscaping. A landscaping plan has not been prepared for the parking lot as the site is heavily wooded in the proposed project area. STAFF REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. Comments received are outlined below: Planning and Inspections A grading permit will be required including the submittal of all required information. The need for stormwater and erosion control permits per the Mound Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) and the City Code shall be determined by the Public Works Director. Public Works Supt. Refer to comments from City Engineer and/or any and/or all comments from PW Director DISCUSSION / COMMENTS The existing property located at 2020 Commerce Boulevard is currently owned by the City of Mound HRA and includes (50) subsidized apartments. The facility is managed on behalf of the City by Westport Properties. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that no CUP is on file for Indian Knoll. No changes to the existing apartment structure are contemplated with the current proposal, The existing parking lot will be patched. -2481 - o 10. When the original project was constructed in 1970, a total of (75) stalls were required and a variance was granted to allow the construction of (16) stalls. The parking requirement for apartments is 2 ~ spaces for each unit, one of which must be indoors. Therefore, the current requirement is (125). The existing facility has (21) spaces and (2) handicapped stalls and is therefore deficient. The proposal, as submitted, adds (19) news stalls to the inventory. .Interior remodeling and landscaping improvements been been undertaken at Indian Knoll which have been favorably received by the residents. A landscaping plan was not submitted for the project as it is contemplated that the remaining area will be left in its current natural condition. City Code Chapter 350.635, Subd. E (6), states that all natural areas shall be propedy maintained in a sightly and well-kept condition. City Code requires a minimum parking stall size of 10' x 20'. The proposal, as submitted, is consistent with the requirement. The existing complex does not meet the parking stall requirement per City Code. The proposal brings the facility closer into compliance with current requirements. Hardcover in residential districts is allowed' up to 40 percent. calculations are provided below: Hardcover Total Lot Size: 40 Percent Allowance 64,931 SF 25,972 SF Existin.q: Building Footprint Interior Courtyard (est.) Parking Lot Sidewalks Shuffleboard Entry Courtyard Dumpster Driveway Shed / Pad 10,580 SF 750 SF 7,000 SF 1050 SF 520 SF 2,023 SF 1,000 SF 192 SF Total Existing Hardcover 23,115 SF -2482- Proposed Parking Lot Improvements Parking Lot 8,000 SF Sidewalks 760 SF Total Proposed Hardcover 31,875 SF As proposed hardcover is approximately (49) percent, variance approval is being requested. 11. Numerous land use approvals associated with the subject property were undertaken previously when the original project was approved and have been provided as attachments. SpeCifically, a parking stall variance was approved which allowed construction of (16) parking spaces. 12. The R-3 District regulations require a 25 foot drive aisle which is inconsistent with City Code Chapter 350:760, Subd 3 which states that drive aisles for parking areas shall not exceed (24) feet in width. Members of the Planning Commission are advised that the engineering standard for drive aisles is (24) feet. 13. City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 3 (D) states that a fence, of adequate design, not over (5) feet or less than (4) feet shall be erected along the Residential District property line(s). Currently, the existing facility is not fenced. The need for a parking lot fence should be discussed by the Planning Commission with regard to impact(s) on adjacent properties (ie. headlights.) 14. The proposal, as submitted, will needed to be modified to meet the setback for R-3 parking spaces which cannot be located within (10) feet from any adjacent lot. This can likely be accomplished by shifting the plan to the NW and/or by removing the SE stall. Alternately, a variance from this provision would need to be approved. 15. The most significant issue associated with the proposal is the removal of several mature trees which are located in the project area and hardcover exceeding 40 percent. 16. Indian Knoll is the first apartment complex in Mound to be certified as a Crime Free Housing Facility. The Mound PD maintains an office on the site. 17. Members of the Planning Commission may wish to discuss the possibility of reducing the stall size to 9' x 18', if appropriate, as a way to reduce hardcover. Variance approval would be needed. -2483- 18. On street parking is not allowed on Commerce Boulevard. 19. Requests for parking on the N/S sides on Balsam Road have been turned down previously. 20. Parking issues associated with the complex are particularly of issue during the winter due to seasonal parking restrictions. 21. No stormwater infrastructure improvements are proposed for the parking lot expansion project. 22. Parking stalls are currently assigned at Indian Knoll. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit associated with the proposed parking lot expansion project at 2020 Commerce Boulevard subject to the following conditions: 1. The City shall be responsible for all required permitting activities. All use, development, construction and operation requirements and standards of the Mound City Code shall apply to and regulate the property in all respects. 3. Additional comments from the Planning Commission, City Council and Staff. A fence be installed in accordance with City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 2 (D) unless deemed unnecessary by the Planning Commission and City Council. The design is modified to meet the setback for R-3 parking spaces which cannot be located within (10) feet from any adjacent lot. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend Council approval of the following variances associated with the parking lot expansion project Parking stall count variance to allow (42) parking stalls all of which are located outdoors. Drive aisle variance to allow (24) foot width as allowed in City Code Chapter 350.760, Subd. 3 (A). 3. Hardcover variance to exceed 40 percent allowance for lots of record. -2484- In recommending variance approval, the following findings are offered: o The proposal adds (19) stalls to the parking inventory at Indian Knoll which is viewed as favorable and brings the complex closer into compliance with the code requirements. The engineering standard size for drive aisle is (24) feet. If the drive aisle width is increased to (25) feet, the parking stalls would not meet the stall size requirements. The overall physical improvements on the site at Indian Knoll are favorable for the residents including increased parking. As proposed, there would be (42) spaces for the complex. Currently there are (50) units. Variance approval for reduced parking stall count was granted as part of the original proposal. The complex is located on a designated transit route which minimizes parking needs. Strong pedestrian ties are required for the project. Removal of existing interior sidewalks to reduce hardcover is not supported. Hardcover for commercially zoned properties is allowed up to 75 percent. -2485- CITY OF MOUND 5341 Meywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. I P LANNING COMM. DATE . CITY COUNCIL DATE: IDistribufion: City Planner:.. City Engineer: Public Works: Fire Dept. Parks: Other: Please type or print the following information: INFORMATION ~PUCA~ ~e ~nt ~: ~r ~ ~en ........ E~ail Addm~ F~ Name O~ER (B ~ ~an Add~ .... Phone H~e ": .W~ ~HI~CT, Conditional Use Permit Info (7/26/2005) Page 4 of 5 -2486- Description of Proposed Use: EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property In the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ ~?., ~_*-~ -- Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property?. ( ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. App~cation must be signed by all owners of the/e~bject propen'y,A or an explanation given~ case. Print Applicant s Name App~ir~ant's Signature ( ~ ~ ,::2 ~,-,/,,,~,,o9~.~0 ,,~,~ / ~) .,._._._. ~,4 nk. ~ / ~ / Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature v / Date / Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date City Code Section 350:525 relating to Conditional Use Permits must be reviewed by the applicant. If applying for a two family dwelling, City Code Section 350:630, Subd. 4. must be reviewed by the applicant. Conditional Use Permit Info (7/26/2005) Page 5 of 5 -2487- CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION ................. i ......... Applicafiqn_ Fee _a. pd Escrqw,D_e_l~O_s.i._t requ_ ired at_p_m_e_ of__ap_pJ_icatio~. City Council Date : ??~--'--~ ~:--~W~~ ) Please type or print I®[libl¥ SUBJECT Address PROPERTY Lot Block LEGAL DESC. Subdivision PID # Plat # ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 PROPERTY Name ~,~V% ~ ~ 9 ~ , Phone Home Wo~ Fax APPLICANT Name ~~ ~,~~ THAN Address %5fl / ~ ~ OWNER) Phone Home ~fi'~~ Work Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes~v~fNo (). If yes, liSt date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of ~solutions. 2. f use. etc.): (10/28/2004) Page 4 of 6 -2488- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc_:!:_ SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE ~ (or existing) Front Yard: ( N S E W ) ,.~ rt. , ft. ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W) .~,4' d"~.,t/'~. ~ ~-~ ~.(~ ~;) ft. ft. SideYard: (NSEW) -~-, i ,~ ~ ~""~- ~ ~' ~"~i\l.(~; .ff. ff. Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ~ ft. ft. Lakeside: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: ff. ff. ff. .sq fl .sq ff .sq ff sq ft sq ft .sq ft Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is I°cated?YeS( )'N°~''lfn°'specifyeachn°n'c°nf°fminguse:~_.~2 .ir_.~_..~~ ~,_,)~ d..~.,~/~)/~/~l,~_' ~'~~jO(,/~ Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ~ . (.~r'existing situation ( )too shallow (~hape ,~othe"r: ~pecify Please describe: Vadance Information (10/28/2004) Page 5 of 6 -2489- Case No. 6. Was the hardship described above created by the action of~nyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No/~"'lf yes, explain: 7. Was the hardship created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (), No ~'~. if yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions, of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes'~"~, No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? /, 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signatur~ Date ~/~ Applicant's Signature Date Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 6 of 6 -2490- SUMMARY OF HARDCOVER RULES Excerpts from the Mound Zoning Ordinance Section 350:310. Definitions. Subd. 65: Impervious Cover. Any surface impervious or resistant to the free flow of water or surface moisture. Impervious cover shall include, but not be limited to all driveways and parking areas whether paved or not, tennis courts, sidewalks, patios, and swimming pools. Open decks (1/4" minimum opening between boards) shall not be counted in impervious cover calculations. Subd. 78: Lot Area, Minimum. The area of a lot in a horizontal plane bounded by the lot lines, but not including any area occupied by a floodplain as designated on the adopted HUD/DNR Floodplain Map. (Federal Regional Elevation: Lake Minnetonka = 929.4; Dutch Lake = 940.0; Lake Langdon = 935.0) · Impervious surface coverage of lots shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. · Accessory buildings shall not exceed 15 % of the total lot area. Section 350:1225, Subd. 6. Shoreland Management. Impervious surface coverage of lotS in residential zones shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. On existing lots of record, impervious coverage may be permitted by a maximum of 40 percent providing that the following techniques are utilized as applicable. Impervious areas should be drained to vegetated areas or grass filter strips through the use of crowns on driveways, direction downspouts on gutters collecting water from roof areas, etc. Dividing or separating impervious areas into smaller areas through the use of grass or vegetated filter strips such as the use of paving blocks separated by grass or sand allowing infiltration. Use grading and construction techniques which encourage rapid infiltration such as the installation of sand or gravel "sump" areas to collect and percolate stormwater. d. Install berms to temporarily detain stormwater thereby increasing soil absorption. Impervious surface coverage in lots in the business and industrial zones shall not exceed 30 percent of the lot area. In business and industrial zones that are included within areas covered by an approved stormwater management plan, impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 75 percent of the total lot area. Revised 08/06/03 -2491 - Property Information Search by Slxeet Address Result page Page 1 of 2 SearCh By: HOUSE or BUZLDZNG #: i2020 STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters) UNZT # (if applicable) ~..~ ~ records per page Hennepin County, MN Property znformation Search Resu The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is dally (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2005 Property iD: Address: Municipality: Sdtool Diet: Watershed: Sewer Diet: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: 13-117-24-32-0030 2020 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND 277 3 Conetruction y Approx. Parcel ~. MOUND HOUSING & REDEV MOUND HOUSING & REDEV % HARRY SMITH 2020 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 Host Current Sales Znformation Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and m arms-length tran.actions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON F~LE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes lk Bounds: Abstract or Torrens: LAKE SIDE PARK A L CROCKERS :I. ST DIV LOTS 23 24 25 AND 26 BLK I LOTS 22 AND 23 BLK 2 AND THAT PART OF LOTS 24 25 AND 26 BLK 2 LYING N OF ST AS OPENED AND LOTS 4 5 6 7 8 AND N 10 Note: This Is a Partial Metes & Bounds De. To receive full tax parcel description, ema ta..x_d~_c, riP_~o_n~bco_,.he_fin~pin.mn.us ABSTRACT Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payabh Values Established by Assessor as of 3anua~. Estimated Market Value: Umited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Zmprovement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: Total Tax: http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresult jSl:- 2492 - 7/26/2005 Default Recenter on click ~ Yes L~/No Hennepin County Property Hap Page 1 of 2 G.iye _ps y ._our., f~ed b_acK How. tq.use Map For quicker response when information on surroundin~ off 'Recenter on click'. Show: (~ No Aerial Photos ~ Aerials 2004* [] City Names [] Street Names [] Address Numbers [] Lot Dimensions *Mpls, aerials south of Franklin Ave. a~ from 2003 ~ydo the..a~da!..phptQ~ !oo w_jth .Iqt d. ime The data contained on this page are derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be dlscl licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The Informa purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or m derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to the Hennepln CounW Survey Division via e-mail at S.u.~e.yo._r,..l~l.a ps.@~p;.__h_enp, epJp.,_r~n,u.,. The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 1024x768 or higher screen r, Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation. H.qme J Your..~quntyCp_v_e_r.~_m~st J _.Lic;e_gse~, Certi!~ic;ates, &..Begistra_~;~9_n J Emplgy.m.~nt;&VO!_unteering J Hea!t;h,._Housi_ng~...& OCopyright © 200f Hennepin County, IVlinnesota I www. Hennepin.us _A..cc~.S_j_bilit!c~gJi_cy J Cg..n.~_cAH_e_~n_n_epi~n..C_o_unty J _S_e.c_.uri_t_y/l¥_iya~cy http://www 13.co.hennepin.mn.us/publicparcelimat- 2493 -Laspx?PID=2411724210034 7/26/2005 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 2 of 2 Property Information Detail for Taxes Payal Values Established by Assessor as of 3anu~ Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Land Umitud Building Limited Values: Total Market: Total Umited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status APARTMENT NON-HOMESTEAD EXEMPT 9229 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Tax related questions: Need help locating a property on our site? Check out our Search Tips_ 5~ia!.__S_~.~i_c_e___s. I ~_.w_.,__P__u__bli.c_._S~_f_.e_~,__~ .C__~_u_~ I Copyright © 2004 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepin.us Accessibility .P_o_l_ic_y I C_o_n.._t_a__.ctc.._H~.n.__n_.epin County I ~ec_u.d~/?~iv .a.c_y__Sta_t_em_e_o~ http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresult.jsp- 2494- 7/26/2005 0 C) , , [3_ 0 ,~ -2495-... ! Page 1 of 4 Subd. 5. Height, Lot Size, Lot Area, Parking and Open Space and General Requirements for Multiple Family Dwellings (R-3). A. The following minimum requirements shall be observed as hereinafter set forth: 1. Height shall be limited to three (3) stories or 35 feet. 2. Minimum lot width shall be 120 feet and lot area 22,000 square feet. 3. Front yard shall be not less than 30 feet, or 11 times the height of the building, whichever is greater. 4. Side and rear yards shall be not less than 20 feet or the height of the building, whichever is greater. 5. A side or rear yard abutting a street shall be not less than 25 feet or the height of the building, whichever is greater. 6. All height measurements shall be from the lowest grade level. 7. No accessory building shall exceed the height of the principal structure. 8. Distance Between Multiple Dwelling Buildings: No building shall be erected closer to any other building than a distance equal to the sum of their respective heights or forty (40) feet, whichever is greater. B. Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: 1. Efficiency Unit and 1 Bedroom - five (5) times minimum floor area (2,400 square feet). 2.2 Bedroom - six (6) times minimum floor area (4,560 square feet) 3. 3 Bedroom or more - seven (7) times minimum floor area plus 500 square feet for each bedroom over three. 4. Minimum lot area average per dwelling - 3,000 square feet. C. Lot Usage: 1. A maximum of 30% for main or principal structure. 2. A minimum of 30% of the lot area shall be green area and landscape area, this may include all setback areas. 3.40% of the area may be used for parking, driveways, garages, refuse areas, storage areas and other permitted uses. D. parking and Sidewalk Requirements for Each Dwelling http ://www.cityo fmound.com/CITY %20CO D ~ o2a4'u92JN-E .html 8/4/2005 Page 2 of 4 1. Two and one half (2-1/2) spaces per unit, one (1) of which must be indoors and one and one half (1-1/2) of which may be outdoor parking. 2. Indoor parking shall be at least 12 x 22 feet as a minimum size. 3. Outdoor parking, shall be at least 10 x 20 feet as a minimum size. 4. All driveways and parking aisles shall be at least 25 feet in width. 5. All interior driveways, parking areas, loading areas, etc., shall be of blacktop or concrete construction. 6. All parking spaces shall be located on the same parcel as the principal structure. 7. There shall be no outdoor parking space within twenty (20) feet of any public right-of-way or closer than ten (10) feet from any adjacent lot. 8. Interior curbs shall be constructed of concrete to separate driving and parking areas from landscaped areas. The curb design shall be normal six (6) inches in height. 9. Concrete walkways shall be provided from parking areas, loading zones and recreation areas to the entrances of the principal structure and garages. E. General Requirements for All Structures: 1. The building plan, including the site plan for a multiple dwelling shall be certified by an architect or engineer registered in the State of Minnesota, stating that he/she has personally viewed the site and has designed the building to fit the site as planned and to be harmonious with the neighboring buildings, topography and natural surroundings and in accordance with the purpose and objectives of the Zoning Code. The architect or engineer shall further certify that he/she has been retained to provide full architectural service, and that he/she will be available to carry this project through to completion. No special use for a multiple dwelling shall be issued until the certificate is provided. On completion of the construction, the supervising architect or engineer shall file a written statement with the Building Inspector certifying that, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, the construction, including site construction, has been performed in substantial compliance with the plans as. approved by the City of Mound. 2. The design shall make use of all land contained in the site. All of the site shall be related to the multiple use, either parking, circulation, recreation, landscaping, screening, building, storage, etc. 3. All exterior vertical surfaces shall have the same or equivalent facing material as that used in the front of the building. 4. The drainage of storm waters shall be provided for either on the site or in a public storm sewer. 5. Garages shall have the same construction and appearance as the main o -2497- http://www.cityofmoand.com/CITY ¼20CODE/o ou,,.~.,NE.html 8/4/2005 Page 3 of 4 building. 6. Landscaping. A landscaping plan shall be required and approved by the City Council. All required yards shall either be open landscaped and green areas or be left in a natural state. If any yards are to be landscaped, they shall be landscaped attractively with lawn, trees, shrubs, etc. Any areas left in a natural state shall be properly maintained in a sightly and well-kept condition. Multiple Family Residential yards adjoining any of the RESIDENTIAL R-l, R-lA and R-2 DISTRICTS shall be landscaped with buffer planting screens. Plans of such screens shall be submitted for approval as a part of the site plan and installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any tract in the district. 7. Open Air Drying of Clothes. Open air drying of clothes shall not be permitted on the grounds of the multiple family dwellings except when the following conditions are met: a. The areas for open air drying of clothes are specifically drawn on the original site plans. b. A durable and dustless surface and adequate screening is provided for the entire area to be used for the drying of clothes. 8. Incinerators and Storage. Any structure or equipment for the burning or storing of trash must comply with the regulations of the State Pollution Control Agency. No open storage will be allowed on the site. 9. Platting. If more than one building is hereafter permitted to be erected upon one parcel of land then the buildings shall be so placed that any future subdivision or conveyance will comply with all setback and other requirements of the Ordinance. 10. Screening. If screening is required by the City Council, it shall consist of a fence or wall that complies with City Ordinances, but shall not extend within 15 feet of any street or ingress or egress. The screening shall be placed along property lines or in case of screening along a street, 15 feet from the street right-of-way with landscaping between the screening and the pavement. Planting of a type approved by the City Council shall also be required in addition to or in lieu of fencing. 11. Building Design and Construction a. Efficiency Dwelling Units. No more than twenty (20) percent of the dwelling units in any one building shall be efficiency dwelling units. b. Sound. Party and corridor partitions and floor systems shall be of a type rated by a laboratory regularly engaged in sound testing as capable of accomplishing an average sound transmission loss (using a 9-frequency test) of not less than fifty (50) decibels. Door systems between corridors and dwelling units shall be of solid core construction and include gaskets and closure plates. Room relationships, hallway designs, door and window placements and plumbing and ventilating installations shall be such that they assist in the control of sound transmission from unit to unit. c. Projecting Air Conditioning and Heating Units. Air conditioning or heating units projecting through exterior walls or windows shall be so located and designed that they o -2498- http://www.cityofmound.com/CITY ¼20CODL,.,.,,,..,.,NE.html 8/4/2005 Page 4 of 4 neither unnecessarily generate nor transmit sound nor disrupt the architectural amenities of the building. Units projecting more than four (4) inches beyond the exterior finish of a building wall shall be permitted only with the written consent of the Building Inspector, which shall be given only when building structural systems prevent compliance. d. Elevators: Any multiple residence building of more than three (3) stories shall be equipped with at least one public elevator. e. Determination of Conformity. Before any building permit is approved for a multiple dwelling the City Council upon recommendation of the Building Inspector shall determine whether the proposed use will conform to the performance standards. The developer or landowner shall supply data necessary to demonstrate such conformance. Such data may include description of equipment to be used, method of refuse disposal, type and location of exterior storage, etc. It may occasionally be necessary for a developer to employ a specialized consultant to demonstrate that a given use will not exceed the performance standards. 350.640 Allowable Uses (Residential Districts). Within the Residential Districts, no building or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses. Letter designations shall be interpreted as meaning: P = Permitted Use C = Conditional Use A = Accessory Use - = Not Allowed Mound City Code 350.640 - Chart http ://www.cityofmound.corrdCITY%20CODg o2~4~9,.95NE.html 8/4/2005 -2500- 270 November 14, 1989 RESOLUTION #89-141 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW A FENCE HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR 2020 COIQ(ERCE BLVD. (P&Z CASE NO. 89-847) WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to allow a six foot high fence to be erected within the required 30 foot setback along Balsam Road for "Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 1, Lots 22 and 23, Block 2, and that part of Lots 24, 25, and 26, Block 2 lying North of street as opened; and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and North 10 feet of LOt 9, Block 4, including adjacent 1/2 of Crocker Avenue and of Shady Lane vacated, Lakeside Park A. L. Crocker's 1st Division, Mound Minnetonka, according to the map or plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Hennepin County, Minnesota", PID #13-117-24- 32 0030, 2020 Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-3 Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code requires a 30 foot setback from the street for a six foot high 'fence; WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that alterations may be made to a building containing a lawful, non- conforming residential property when the alterations will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval to improve security for a multiple family senior housing unit with a history of vandalism, and since Balsam Road is not a main thoroughfare, the fence set- back at 30 feet would be in the middle of the parking lot, and the density of cars in the parking lot; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: The City does hereby authorize the two foot fence height variance to extend a fence within the required 30 foot setback for the property located at 2020 Com- merce Blvd., legally described as "Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 1, Lots 22 and 23, Block 2, and that part of Lots 24, 25, and 26, Block 2 lying North of street as opened; and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and North 10 feet of Lot 9, Block 4, including adjacent 1/2 of Crocker Avenue and of Shady Lane vacated, Lakeside Park A. L. -2501- 271 November 14, 1989 Crocker's 1st Division, Mound Minnetonka, according to the map or plat thereof on file or of record in the of- lice of the Register of Deeds of Hennepin County, Minnesota", PID #13-117-24-32 0030, 2020 Commerce Boulevard The City Council authorizes the the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the following alteration to a nonconforming use of the property to ensure security and afford the owner reasonable use of his land. me To construct a six foot high fence approximately five feet from Balsam Road, as shown on Exhibit A. Upon the following conditions: l) The fence is to be constructed of material that is see-through, such as chain link, to alleviate a possible visibility problem when entering the public right-of-way. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: "Lots 23, 24, 25, and 26, Block 1, Lots 22 and 23, Block 2, and that part of Lots 24, 25, and 26, Block 2 lying North of street as opened; and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and North 10 feet of Lot 9, Block 4, including ad- jacent 1/2 of Crocker Avenue and of Shady Lane vacated, Lakeside Park A. L. Crocker's 1st Division, Mound Min- netonka, according to the map or plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Hennepin County, Minnesota", PID #13-117-24-32 0030, 2020 Commerce Boulevard; This variance shall be recorded with the County Re- corder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restric- tion on how this property may be used. -2502- 272 November 14. 1989 The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Mayor Smith and seconded by Councilmember Johnson. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. ' Ma~or At~est: di{~ -Clerk -2503- ORDINANCE NO. 264 AN ORDINANCE AKENDING CHAPTER 23, "ZONING", OF THE MOUND CODE OF ORDINANCES The Village Council of the Village of Mound do ordain: 1. That Chapter 23.05, Subd. C of the Mound Code of &£dinances be and hereby is amended by reducing the Residential Use District B, by removing therefrom the following described tract, and that Section 23.06, Subd. B, Multiple Dwelling Use District, is amended to expand said use district by adding thereto the following described tract: Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, Block 1, Lots 22 & 23, Block 2, and that part of Lots 24, 25 & 26, Block 2, lying North of the street as opened, and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, S and the N. l0 feet of Lot 9, Block 4 including adjacent 1/2 of Crocker Avenue and of Shady Lane vacated, Lakeside Park A. L. Crocker's 1st Division. 2. That this ordinance be effective from and after its adoption and publication according to law. - Orval Fenstad, Mayor Attest: Passed by Villa.e C :'~ncil March Published April 2, 1970 10, 1970 -2504- 70-44 2-10-70 RESOLUTION NO. 70-44 RESOLUTION ORDERING EEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 23, MOUND CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLED, "ZONING" (Housing for Elderly) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That a hearing be had on the 10th day of March, 1970, at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Hall in Island Park to amend Chapter 23, Mound Code of Ordinances entitled, "Zoning," by removing from the Residential Use District B and adding to the Multiple Dwelling Use District the following described property for Housing for the Elderly: Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, Block 1, Lots 22 & 23, Block 2, and that part of Lots 24, 25 & 26, Block 2, lying North of the street as opened, and Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and the N. l0 feet of Lot 9, Block 4 including adjacent ~ of Crocker Avenue and Shady Lane vacated, Lakeside Park, Crockers 1st Division. That the Clerk be, and hereby is, directed to duly publish notice of the same and is further directed to mail notice thereof to owners of properties within 200 feet thereof. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of February, 1970. -2505- 70-84 4- 14-70 RESOLUTION NO. 70-84 RESOLUTION GRANTING HEIGHT VARIANCE (Plat 61710 Parcel 610) WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is assisting the Village of Mound in building low cost housing for Senior Citizens at 2020 Commerce Boulevard, and WNRREAS, the Mound Housing Authority has requested a height variance from 55 feet to 40 feet in order to build the proposed housing for the elderly on Plat 61710, Parcel 610, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the height variance from 35 feet to 40 feet be granted. Adopted by the CounCil this 14th day of April, 1970. -2506- 70-85 4-14-70 RESOLUTION NO. 70-85 RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN NUMBER OF FLOORS (Plat 61710, Parcel 610) WTURREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is assisting the Village of Mound in building low cost housing for Senior Citizens at 2020 Commerce Boulevard, and WEEREAS, the Mound Housing Authority has requested a variance in the number of floors from three to four in order to build the proposed housing for the elderly on Plat 61710, Parcel 610, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TREVILLAGE COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the building to be placed on Plat 61710, Parcel 610 be permitted to have four stories on the east. Adopted by the Council this 14th day of April, 1970. -2507- 70-86 4-14-70 RESOLUTION NO. 70-86 RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN PARKING SPACES (Plat 61710, Parcel 610) WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is assisting the Village of Mound in building low cost housing for Senior Citizens at 2020 Commerce Boulevard, and WNRREAS, Section 23.30 of the Mound Code of Ordinances requires 1½ spaces per unit for parking, and WHEREAS, the U. S. Housing and Development Authority has found that park- lng is not needed to a great extent in the senior citizen buildings, and WHEREAS, the Mound Housing Authority has requested a variance in parking spaces from 75 to 16, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That a variance from 75 parking spaces to 16 parking spaces be granted on Plat 61710, Parcel 610. Adopted by the Council this l~th day of April, 1970 -2508- CITY OF MOUND - ZONING INFORMATION SHEET DIRECTION LOT OF RECORD? YES / NO ZONING DISTRICT, LOT SIZE/WIDTH: EXISTING LOT SIZE: · R3. 10,000/60 Bi~ '7,500/o LOT WIDTH: .~A ~,000/40 B: :0,000/80 -~ 6, ooo/4o~..) B3 :o, ooo/so 'R2 1'4, O00/BO ' ' ' JJ ~ / -'. ' , LOT DEPTH: R3 SEE OP.D. TX 30,000/100 RI~UIRIiD ] EXISTING/PROPOSED VARIANCE I I GARAGE, SHED ..... ' N S E w N S E W N S E w N S E w N S E W N S E w 50' 10' OR 30' DETACHED BUILDINGS N S E W N S E W N S E W N S E W N S E W N'S E W 30% OR 40% 4' OR 6' 4' OR6' 10' OR 30' This Zoning .information Sheet only ~ununarizes a portion of the requirements outlined in the City of Mound Zoning Ordinnnce. For further information, contact the City of Mound . Planning. '!0 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 15, 2005 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Review of Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments APPLICANT: City of Mound SUMMARY The City Council will hold a public hearing to consider proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the definition for "frontage", the required front setback for unimproved streets exceeding 15 feet in width and allowable fence materials. REVIEW PROCEDURE Minnesota State Statutes 462.357 Subd. 3 states that no zoning ordinance or amendment can be adopted until a public hearing is held by the planning agency or by the governing body. Additionally, the notice of the public hearing must also be published at least (10) days prior to the hearing date. According to the City Code, the City Council is responsible for holding the public hearing for review of all text amendments and rezoning. Members are advised that the notice of public hearing was published in the Laker on August 13, 2005. Therefore, all notification requirements have been satisfied. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW OF CITY CODE AMENDMENT City Code Section 350:520 requires that any proposed text amendment which is not initiated by the Planning Commission must be referred to the Planning Commission for review and must not be acted upon until it has received the Planning Commission's recommendation. Members of the City Council are advised that formal review of the proposed amendment by the Planning Commission occurred at the August 8th meeting. Copies of the meeting minute excerpts have been included as attachments. DISCUSSION The definition of "frontage" is recommended to be revised so as to allow properties which have been encumbered by street and/or ROW easements to be measured from property lines as originally platted. -2510- As the Council may recall, several double front/corner setback variances from unimproved streets have been granted over the past several years. In most cases, the Council has allowed a (10) foot setback from unimproved streets as opposed to the standard (20) or (30) foot front setback standard. Members of the Council are advised that the City Code currently allows the application of a side/roar setback (as appropriate) for firelanes and unimproved streets (less than 15 feet). Amendment(s) are proposed to the fence regulations to allow the use of additional commercially-available fence materials including, but not limited to, wrought iron, masonry, metal, vinyl, etc. RECOMMENDATION Based on its review, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council approve the propoSed zoning amendment(s) as presented. -2511 - NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDING MOUND CITY CODE SECTION 350 (ZONING ORDINANCE) AS IT RELATES TO DEFINITIONS, SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAYS EXCEEDING 15 FEET AND ALLOWABLE FENCE MATERIALS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers, 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 to hold a public hearing to consider the following proposed amendments to Mound City Code Chapter 350 (Zoning Ordinance) as follows: Subsection 350:3'10, Subdivision 80 is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 80. Lot Line. The property line bounding a lot except that where any portion of a lot extends into the public street right-of-way, the lot line shall be deemed to be the boundary of said public right-of-way for the purpose of applying this Ordinance. This exception does not aoply'~ any additional public street right-of-way obtained following the initial establishment of the street. Subsection 350.440 is hereby amended to add a new Subdivision '11 as follows: Subd. '11. In residential districts, unimproved street frontages havinq a width exceedinq (15) feet, shall be considered side yards or rear yards, as appropriate. The minimum side setback shall be (10)feet. Subsection 350.475, Subd. 2 (C) is hereby amended as follows: C In all districts, fences shall consist of materials comparable in grade and quality to the following: chain link, wood, wrought iron, vinyl, plastic, decorative masonary or other acceptable similar material, constructed from commercially available materials. Wooden_fences shall not be constructed from twigs, branches, doors, siding or other wooden products originally intended for other purposes. Copies of the proposed amendments are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Published in The Laker on August 13, 2005 Jill Nodander, Planning and Inspections Secretary 1 -2512- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 8, 2005 OLD I NEW BUSINESS Review of Proposed Amendments to City Code Chapter 350 - Smith explained the proposals. MOTION by Ayaz, second by Michael, to approve proposed ordinance changes as presented by Staff. MOTION carried unanimously. -2513- DRAFT CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. -2005 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE (ZONING ORDINANCE) AS IT RELATES TO DEFINITIONS.SETBACK REQUlREMENTSFOR UNIMPROVED RIGHT-OF-WAYS AND ALLOWABLE FENCE MATERIALS The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 350:310, Subdivision 80 is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 80. Lot Line. The property line bounding a lot except that where any portion of a lot extends into the public street right-of-way, the lot line shall be deemed to be the boundary of said public right-of-way for the purpose of applying this Ordinance. This exceotion does not apolv to any additional public street rioht-of-way obtained following the initial establishment of the street. Subsection 350.440 is hereby amended to add a new Subdivision 11 as follows: Subd. 11. In residential districts, unimproved street frontages having a width exceeding (15) feet, shall be considered side yards or rear yards, as appropriate. The minimum side setback shall be (10) feet. Subsection 350.475, Subd. 2 (C) is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 2. Construction and Maintenance - Fences C 'In all districts, fences shall consist of materials comparable in grade and quality to the followinq: be-either-chain link_ or wood, wrought iron, vinyl, plastic, decorative masonary or other acceptable similar material, -constructed ~from commercially available ~ materials. Wooden fences shall not be constructed from twigs, branches, doors, siding or __ other wooden_ .products originally intended for other purposes. Passed by the City Council this day of 2005. 1 -2514- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Mound Council, Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 16, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance(s) Request - Fence Height and Requirement OWNER / APPLICANT: Aqua Pool and Spa / Tim Belivieu PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 05-53 LOCATION: 1605 Bluebird Lane ZONING: R-lA Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential Swimming Pool Enclosure SUMMARY At its August 8, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed a variance request(s) submitted by Aqua Pool and Spa (on behalf of Tim Belivieu) to allow construction of an (8) foot cedar fence (6 foot with 2 foot decorative lattice) to be installed along the north property line at 1605 Bluebird Lane. Pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:475, side yard fences are permitted to be placed along property lines behind the front setback area as long as they do not exceed six (6) feet in height. The purpose for the fence is for privacy and to buffer noise associated with mechanical equipment located on the north side of the house. The requested variance is described below: Proposed Allowed Variance Side yard fence (8) feet (6) feet (2) feet The applicants are also requesting a variance to waive the swimming pool fencing requirements set forth in City Code Chapter 350.645 as a specially designed pool cover has been installed on the new pool. The applicant has indicated that the installation of a fence may affect views to the lake for the owner(s) and neighboring property owners. -2515- STAFF RECOMMENDATION Height Variance. Staff recommended approval of the the variance request for the 8- foot privacy fence to be constructed on a portion of the north lot line subject to the following condition(s): The fence shall be placed on the property line and shall meet the provisions of City Code Chapter 350.475 for fences. Any fence constructed within the (50) foot lakeshore setback area shall not exceed 3-feet and must maintain a see-through visibility level equal to that of chain-link type fence and shall be treated so as to blend with the natural surroundings of the setback area. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs associated with the review of the land use application. The following findings were offered with regard to the height variance: The fence, as proposed, is (6) feet with 2 feet of decorative lattice. The fence will help buffer noise from the mechanical equipment located on the north side of the new house for neighboring properties. Varied topography. Swimming Pool Enclosure. Staff did not support the variance request to waive the swimming pool fencing requirements due to the installation of a pool cover based on the following findings: The possibility for "human error" thus leaving the pool open and available for unauthorized use. 2. Potential public safety issues. Deviation from the established swimming pool provisions may be precedent setting. There are appropriate methods and/or alternatives to fence the swimming pool area(s) which would not negatively affect views from adjacent properties including but not limited to, chain link, etc. -2516- 5. The building permit for the new pool included a provision which required installation of a fence. PLANNING COMMISlSON RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of the fence height variance due to lack of hardship and approval of the variance request to waive the swimming pool enclosure provisions due to installation of specialized pool cover system. Details regardin~the Planning Commission's review of the applications are contained in the August 8"' meeting minute excerpts which have been provided. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1. A copy of the Planning Report No. 05-53 has been included as an attachment. Staff has requested information from the applicant regarding discounted insurance associated with the swimming pool cover as well as documentation from the involved neighbor regarding their desire not to install the swimming pool fencing due to possible impacted views. As of this date, the information has not yet been received but should be available at the meeting. Due to differing recommendations from Staff and the Planning Commission regarding the variance(s), a resolution has not been prepared in advance of the City Council meeting and will likely be brought back for action at an upcoming meeting. -2517- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING 'COMMISSION AUGUST 8, 2005 CASE ~05'53 VARIANCES 8 FOOT FENCE HEIGHT AND WAIVER OF SWIMMING POOL REQUIREMENTS '1605 BLUEBIRD LANE - AQUA POOL & SPA I TIM BELIVEAU The applicants have submitted a variance request to allow construction of an 8 foot cedar fence to be installed along the north property line. Currently, City Code restricts side yard fences to 6 feet. The applicants are also requesting a variance to waive the swimming pool fencing requirement as a specially designed pool cover has been installed on the new pool. Staff supports the variance request for the 8 foot privacy fence subject to the following conditions: 1. The fence shall be placed on the property line and shall meet the provisions of City Code Chapter 350.475 for fences. 2. Any fence constructed within the 50 foot lakeshore setback area shall not exceed 3 feet and must maintain a see-through visibility level equal to that of chain-link fence and shall be treated so as to blend with the natural surroundings of the setback area. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs associated with the review of the land use application. Staff does not support the variance request to waive the swimming pool fencing requirements based on the following findings: 1. The possibility for "human error" thus leaving the pool open and available for unauthorized use. 2. Potential public safety issues. 3. Deviation from the established swimming pool provisions may be precedent setting. 4. There are appropriate methods and/or altematives to fence the swimming pool areas which would not negatively affect views from adjacent properties including but not limited to chain link, etc. 5. The building permit for the new pool included a provision which required installation of a fence. The neighbors affected by the fence have indicated support for the variance. It is thought that the additional 2 feet may help in controlling the noise from an air conditioning unit as well as the pool pump. -2518- Planning Commission Minutes August 8, 2005 Kevin, Aqua Pool & Spa stated that there are several communities that allow the pool covers in lieu of fencing. The cover is designed to hold water, debris and people. The pool has an extensive video and alarm system. It was also stated that the homeowners' insurance company gave them a significant reduction for use of the pool cover. There is no such reduction for fence use. Mueller (in his absence) is opposed to the pool fence variance. Ayaz is strongly for a pool cover of this kind vs. a fence. Key operation makes it much safer. The point of fencing is to eliminate the liability. Osmek wanted to see the neighborhood support in wdting. There is a significant maintenance advantage to keeping the cover shut. Burma added that another savings is the reduction in chemical use. He is impressed with the insurance company's premium reduction and the neighbor's support. We might want to look at revising the code. Michael cannot support the fence height variance. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Ayaz, to recommend Council approval of the 8 foot fence variance. MOTION denied. Voting for: Osmek, ^yaz. Voting against: Glister, Michael, Burma, Hasse. MOTION by Michael, seconded by Burma, to recommend denial. MOTION approved. Voting for: Glister, Michael, Burma, Hasse. Voting against: Osmek, Ayaz. Findings of Fact: The Planning Commission has never approved a fence variance. MOTION by Ayaz, second by Burma, to approve the pool cover instead of fencing. MOTION approved unanimously. Findings of Fact: Better device for deterrent and safety than fencing. Reduces impact to the neighbors and maintains sight lines. 2 -2519- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 PLANNING REPORT TO:. Mound Council,-Planning Cornmission and Staff FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 4, 2005 SUBJECT: Variance(s) Request- Fence Height and Swimming Pool Enclosure Requirement OWNER I APPLICANT: Aqua Pool and Spa / Tim Belleview PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 05-53 LOCATION: 1605 Bluebird Lane ZONING: R-lA Single-Family Residential COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY The applicant, Aqua Pool and Spa (on behalf of Tim Bellieveu) has submitted a variance(s) request to allow construction of an (8) foot cedar fence (6 foot with 2 foot decorative lattice) to be installed along the north property line at 1605 Bluebird Lane. Pursuant to City Code Chapter 350:475, side yard fences are permitted to be placed along property lines behind the front setback area as long as they do not exceed six (6) feet in height. The purpose for the fence is for privacy and to buffer noise associated with mechanical equipment located on the north side of the house. The requested variance is described below: Proposed Allowed Variance Side yard fence (8) feet (6) feet (2) feet The applicants are also requesting a variance to waive the swimming pool fencing requirements set forth in City Code Chapter 350.645 as a specially designed pool cover has been installed on the new pool. The applicant has indicated that the installation of a fence may affect views to the lake for the owner(s)' and neighboring property owners. -2520- 60-DAY PROCESS The application was received and deemed to be complete on or around July 25, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny a land use request. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION All property owners abutting the subject site were mailed a copy of the Planning Commission agenda on or around August 4~ to inform them of the variance request. No comments have been received as of this writing. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. GENERAL COMMENTS Building Permit No. 2004-00877 was issued to Vogue Homes in December 2005 for a new single-family dwelling on the subject property. The City has issued a 30-day occupancy permit for the structure following authorization by the Building Offifical subject to conditions. Building Permit No. 2005-00104 was issued to Aqua Pool and Spa in April 2005 to allow installation of a new pool subject to conditions including installation of a fence pursuant to City Code Chapter 350.475. As a specially designed cover has been installed on the pool, the applicants are requesting waiver of the swimming pool enclosure requirements. The variance and fence applications were submitted on 7~25. Members of the Commission are advised that the side yard fence was installed without authorization. The involved parties were notified that the fence should be removed immediately as a permit was not approved and was not placed in a conforming location. The fence was subsequently relocated and it is Staff's understanding that the fence was left in place so as to minimize noise. 4. The fence material for the 8-foot fence is consistent with the code regulations. 5. Excerpts from the Building Code which address swimming pools and barrier provisions have been included. -2521 - Staff has contacted several cities regarding their current provisions for swimming pool enclosure(s) which has been included as an attachment. In general, all cities contacted required swimming pools to be fenced with the exception of Plymouth, Stillwater and Hutchinson. 7. The proposal has been forwarded to Fire Chief Pederson and Police Chief Kurtz for review. Due to potential for safety concerns, Police Chief Kurtz does not support waiver of the swimming pool fencing regulations. Formal comments from Chief Pederson are forthcoming. Due to the proximity of the 1605 and 1601 Bluebird properties and topography, the installation of a higher fence could minimize noise impacts from the involved mechanical and pool systems located on the Belleview property. A letter in support of the proposed 8-foot fence has been submitted by the owners of 1601 Bluebird Lane. RECOMMENDATION Height Variance. Staff supports the variance request for the 8-foot privacy fence to be constructed on a portion of the north lot line subject to the following condition(s): The fence shall be placed on the property line and shall meet the provisions of City Code Chapter 350.475 for fences. Any fence constructed within the (50) foot lakeshore setback area shall not exceed 3-feet and must maintain a see-through visibility level equal to that of chain-link type fence and shall be treated so as to blend with the natural surroundings of the setback area. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs associated with the review of the land use application. The following findings are offered with regard to the height variance: The fence, as proposed, is (6) feet with 2 feet of decorative lattice. The fence will help buffer noise from the mechanical equipment located on the north side of the new house for neighboring properties. Varied topography. Swimming Pool Enclosure. Staff does not support the variance request to waive the swimming pool fencing requirements due to the installation of a pool cover based on the following findings: The possibility for "human error" thus leaving the pool open and available for unauthorized use. -2522- including but not limited to, chain link; etc. Potential public safety issues. Deviation from the established swimming pool provisions may be precedent setting. There are appropriate methods and/or alternatives to fence the swimming pool area(s_) which would not negativ~___ely_ affect views from adjacen__tproperties 5. The building permit for the new pool included a provision which required installation of a fence. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW Tentatively, the variance application is scheduled to be forwarded to the City Council for review at its July 26, 2005 meeting in the event a recommendation from the Planning Commission is made at its July 11,2005 meeting. -2523- CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow, Deposit required at time of Rpplication. ~ City Council Date ~,~,¢, ~ Please type or print legibly PROPERTY LEGAL PID ~ Plat ZONING DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 OWNER Phone Home Work Fax APPLICANT Name ~~ ~OO~ (IF OTHER OWNER) 1. Has an application ever been~..~_~.de for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure forth~s re e '~ Yes · p p rty. ( ) !~ If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutt~T~. o Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 4 of 6 -2524- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply w..~all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning · district in which it is located? Yes~"No (). If no, specify each non-conforming use (describe reason for variance request, !.e. setback, r6t-area etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: ( N S~)W ) ff. ~C)C3 ft. ft. Side Yard: (~)S E W ) ft. (~ ft. ft. Side Yard: ( N(~)E W ) ft. (~ :~ ft. ft. ~L. %,.~ Lakeside: ( N S E ~) ft. (~ ~O ft. ft. · (NSEW) ff. ff. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft .sq ff sq ft Hardcover: sq ft .sq ft sq ft 4: Does the presen,~use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Ye(.~, No ('). If no, specify each non-conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow ( ) shape Please describe: '~~ ~F-¢'3~ ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) drainage ~ ( ) existing situation ~;~lother: specify Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 5 of 6 -2525- Case No. o Was the hardship described above created bY the action of an_.~one having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinanCe was'adOPted (1982)? Yes (), N~ If yes, expla n: . 7. W.W~e hards_~ created by any other man-made change, such as the relocation of a road? No,~ If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Y~ No (). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature Applicant's Signatur~~ Date Variance Information (10/28/2004) Page 6 of 6 -2526- 2u! 25. 05 08:54a PLRHHZHG p.9 Fence Permit Applica§on City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone: (952) 472.0607 Fax: (952) 472.0679 Applicant is: [] Owner ~Contractor [] Tenant DESCRIPTION Subdivision t ~"J~3, r~,C~_ PO ~r',?r' PID~ ow.E. .am, ~~ ~ ~1~ ~ ~.~ Address Home Ph Work Cell TYPE OF FENCE: ['"lBoard or Picket I-~Wrought Iron I'-IChain Link [-'lSplit Rail THE FENCE IS ~,.~olid [] Open FENCE HEIGHT (including posts): [~F.~ont Yard .~ ~.Side Yard ~ ~' F-IRear Yard r"'lLakeshom I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with ~,¢nether specified or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY & DATE COPIED APPROVED PLANS CHECKED BY ZONING APPROVED BY & DATE PUBLIC WORKS -2527- To: The City of Mound Regarding: 1605 Bluebird Lane's Fence Variance To Whom It May Concern: Aqua Pool and Spa is applying for this fence variance for the property at 1605 Bluebird Lane. The fence will be a solid wooden 6ft high fence with a 2ft high lattice that stands atop the solid wood, making the fence a total of 8ft in height. It will include one self-latching gate that will connect to a comer of the house. The gate will be 4ft wide and attached to the house; the fence will extend outward another 3ft, making it 7ft from the house to the comer of the fence (moving in a Northeasterly direction). The fence will then make a right angle mm to the Northwest, and extend another 75ft from that comer along the property line, and will end with an 8ft post. See Survey for Illustration *Aqua Pool and Spa will be installing an automatic roll cover for the pool, and a locking cover for the spa. *The property is a lakeshore property. The house itself is within 135ft of Lake Minnetonka (and no fence is required). Installing a fence would block the homeowner's view of the lakeshore (which is the very point of purchasing a lakeshore property). *There are numerous cities and townships in the state of Minnesota that do not require a fence if an automatic roll cover is installed. Having both is often unnecessary because they serve the same purpose: to prevent injury or possible drowning in the swimming pool. * We have obtained written permission from the homeowner's neighbors stating their compliance with our fencing plans. For these reasons, Aqua Pool and Spa does not believe we need to completely enclose the pool following the city's standard requirements. We have enclosed a survey with the proposed fence sketched to scale, a brochure on our pool covers, and the technical specifications of the pool cover. Any questions regarding this may be directed to Sandy or Kevin at Aqua Pool and Spa. Office #: 763-544-3367, Fax #: 763-546-8446 -2528- 2005 To Whom It May Concern: We are in agreement with theowner of 1605 Bluebird Lane, Tim Beliveau, thru an eight foot fence would be in both of our best interests. Because our land overlooks the 1605 lawn and we have a deck in that location, this fence at eight feet high would really only be about 5.6 feet over our deck. This way, when we are using our deck and Beliveaus' are using their patio we will not intrude on each others' space. Ted and Je, ane~ Metz Tim and Shelley Beliveau -2529- O~'Z ZOO 0 xC,~ Oo~ 0 m ::::1 zz I~ .II II iI I -2530- I(o I I I I I ~x Manufacturer's Wiring Diagram Electrical ~n Junction Box 20 .Amp. ............... i,~ 0f C~rcuit .....11 [20~ Ci Ami ).. ~, 220 Amp ircu,t Inside panel must designate $ breakers: Two for the motor 220v One for the switch 110v 2 Circuits - 5 wires 110 - Black, White, & Green 220 - Red & Brown Pump Switch in 4 Wires Do Not Change Length of Sealtight /~ ~'~'~'\,,, High ..... Switch from .~ ~/~ Low to High '!~. /Low Back of Motor Switch out S~lch Wires to 5'aikh Terminal Brack (7) Bee (8) Red (2) YeUme (4) Switch Switch must be placed in order to view 100% of the pool. **Needs to have 3 breakers, and wires must be color cooranated. ANY DEVIATION, WHICH CAUSES A POWERPACK FAILURE, IS NOT COVERED BY WARRANTY. -2531 - -2532- I E E E E E E ~ E -2533- Surface Mounted Installation for a New or Existing Pool: Top Track. T 14" 356mm 1 I 36" , , 18' 910mm Concrete Pads required 450mm :3~: forfixing Drive Unit& End Bracket Concrete""Pads to finish flush Ddve Side with top of coping/paving Non Drive 3" Hose Duct T 14" 356mm 1 Surface Mounted Tracking to be placed on FRONT or REAR edge of coping. (see track placement on 12~ coping detail) C¢~ng 21" / 533mm 15 -2534- Drawing not to Scale Track-Track Dimension FLUSH TRACK TRACK STONES GrooYe Coping Track-Track Dimension FLUSH TRACK GROOVE COPING Groove Coping INWALL TRACK Track-Track Dimension ~ PoolWall NOTE ALL Top Track measurements are taken from TRACK GROOVE Track-Track Dimension 23/4" - 70mm Pool Wall TOP TRACK RECTANGLE POOLS ONLY Track-Track Dimension Peel TOP TRACK RECTANGLE WITH R/END OR SHAPED POOLS Wan Pool Wall -2535- X 44 -2536- I~ 44 SWIMMING POOLS & HOT TUBS/SPAS PERMIT REQUIREMENTS A building permit is required for in ground swimming poOls. Above ground pools and hot tubs/spas require no building permit for their installation. However, the setback, hardcover and fencing requirements apply and per[mits are required for the electrical and plumbing work needed for installation. r-] 1. A completed building permit application (attached) r-] 2. A completed fence permit application (attached) r-] 3. A site plan or survey of the property indicating the following: ~ Lot dimensions - Location of existing struCtures (house, garage, sheds, etc.) - Location of the proposed swimming pool - Distance of pool from the all structures and lot lines - For lakeshore lots, distance of pool from the Ordinary High Water Level. [] 4. Manufacturer's specification drawings and information. J--] 5. A completed Hardcover Calculation Sheet ,ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING'REQUIREMENTS Separate electrical and plumbing permits are required for modifications necessary during pool/spa installation. Electrical permits and inspections are done by the State Electrical Inspector. Permit application forms are available at City Hall for $1.75. Any questions related to electrical requirements should be directed to Dave Hucky at 952-442- 1955. -2538- Excerpts from Mound City Code Section 350:645 Subd. 3. Swimming Pools and Hot Tub~, Within any Residential District, swimming pools and hot tubs shall be permitted subject to the following restrictions: A. Swimming Pools. Swimming pools having a water depth of two (2) feet or more which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: 1. Swimming pools shall be subject to the following setbacks: Side yard Corner lots, from the side street 1 Rear yard Lakeshore, from O.H.W. From any structure on same lot From principal building on an adjoining lot 10 feet 5 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 feet 20 feet Private swimming pools are prohibited in the front portion of residential parcels. The front portion includes the area extending across the entire width of the lot and situated between the front line of the principal building and the front lot line. The swimming pool shall be entirely enclosed by a protective fence or other permanent structure not less than five (5) feet nor more than six (6) feet in height. Such protective enclosures shall be maintained by locked gates or entrances when the pool is not tended by a qualified and responsible person. B.....Hot Tubs. Outdoor hot tubs shall comply with items 1. and 2. above with the exception that the setback from any structure on the same lot shall not apply. Furthermore, all outdoor hot tubs shall be required to either contain surrounding decking with appropriate guardrails or shall be secured by a locked cover when not in use. -2539- APPENDIX G SWIMMING POOLS, SPAS AND HOT TUBS SECTION AG101 SECTION AG104 ' GENERAL SPAS ANDHOT TUBS AG101.1 General. The provisions of this appendix shall con- trol the design and construction of swimming pools, spas and hot tubs installed in or on the lot of a one- and two-family dwelling. SECTI°N. AG102 DEFINITIONS AG102.1 General. For the purposes of these requirements, the terms used shall be defined as follows and as set forth in Chapter 2. ABOVE-GROUND/ON-GROUND POOL. See "Swim- ming pool." BARRIER. A fence, wall, building wall or combination there- of which completely surrounds the swimming pool and obstructs access to the swimming pool. HOT TUB. See "Swimming pool." IN-GROUND POOL. See "Swimming pool." RESIDENTIAL. That which is situated on the premises of a detached one- or two-family dwelling or a one-family town- house not more than three stories in height. SPA, NONPORTABLE. See "Swimming pool." SPA, PORTABLE. A nonpermanent structure intended for recreational bathing, in which all controls, water-heating and water-circulating equipment are an integral part of the product. SWIMMING POOL. Any structure intended for swimming or recreational bathing that contains water over 24 inches (610 mm) deep. This includes in-ground, aboveground and on-ground swimming pools, hot tubs and spas. SWIMMING POOL, INDOOR. A swimming pool which is totally contained within a structure and surrounded on all four sides by walls of said structure. SWIMMING POOL, OUTDOOR. Any swimming pool which is not an indoor pool. SECTION AG103 SWIMMING POOLS AG103.1 In-ground pools. In-ground pools shall be designed and constructed in conformance with ANSI/NSPI-5 as listed in Section AG107. AG103.2 Above-ground and on-ground pools. Above- ground and on-ground pools shall be designed and constructed in conformance with ANSI/NSPI-4 as listed in Section AG 107. AG104.1 Permanently installed spas and hot tubs. Perma- nently installed spas and hot tubs shall be designed and constructed in conformance with ANSIfNSPI-3 as listed in Section AG107. AG104.2 Portable spas and hot tubs. Portable spas and hot tubs shall be designed and constructed in conformance with ANSI/IqSPI-6 as listed in Section AG1-07. SECTION AG105 BARRIER REQUIREMENTS AG105.1 Application. The provisions of this chapter shall control the design of barriers for residential swimming pools, spas and hot tubs. These design controls are intended to provide protection against potential drownings and near-drownings by restricting access to swimming pools, spas and hot tubs. AG105.2 Outdoor swimming pool. An outdoor swimming pool, including an in-ground, aboveground or on-ground pool, hot tub or spa shall be provided with a barrier which shall com- ply with the following: 1. The top of the barrier shall be at least 48 inches (1219 mm) above grade measured on the side of the barrier which faces away from the swimming pool. The maximum verti- cal clearance between grade and the bottom of the barrier shall be 2 inches (51 mm) measured on the side of the bar- tier which faces away from the swimming pool. Where the top of the pool structure is above grade, such as an aboveground pool, the barrier may be at ground level, such as the pool structure, or mounted on top of the pool structure. Where the barrier is mounted on top of the pool structure, the maximum vertical clearance between the top of the pool structure and the bottom of the barrier shall be 4 inches (!02 mm). 2. Openings in the barrier shall not allow passage of a 4-inch-diameter (102 mm) sphere. 3. Solid barriers which do not have openings, such as a ma- sonry or stone wall, shall not contain indentations or pro- trusions except for normal construction tolerances and tooled masonry joints. 4. Where the barrier is composed of horizontal and vertical members and the distance between the tops of the horizon- tal members is less than 45 inches (1143 mm), the horizon- tal members shall be located on the swimming pool side of the fence. Spacing between vertical members shall not ex- ceed 1.75 inches (44 mm) in width. Where there are deco- rative cutouts within vertical members, spacing within the cutouts shall not exceed 1.75 inches (44 mm) in width. 5. Where the barrier is composed of horizontal and vertical members and the distance between the tops of the horizon- tal members is 45 inches (1143 mm) or more, Spacing 2000 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE~ - 2540- s4s APPENDIX G between vertical members shall not exceed 4 inches (102 mm). Where there are decorative cutouts within ver- tical members, spacing within the cutouts shall not exceed 1.75 inches (44 mm) in width. 6. Maximum mesh size for chain link fences shall be a 1.25-inch (32 mm) square unless the fence is provided with slats fastened at the top or the bottom which reduce the openings to hot m°re than I ~75 inches (44 mm). 7. Where the barrier is composed of diagonal members,such as a lattice fence, the maximum opening formed by the diagonal members shall not be more than 1.75 inches (44 mm). 8. Access gates shall comply with the requirements of Sec- 10.2. The ladder or steps shall be surrounded by a barrier which meets the requirements of Section AG 105.2, · Items 1 through 9. When the ladder or steps are se- cured, locked or removed, any opening created shall not allow the passage of a 4-inch-diameter (102 mm) sphere. AG105.3 Indoor swimming pool. All walls surrounding an indoor swimming pool shall comply with Section AG105.2, Item 9. AG105.4 Prohibited locations. Barriers shall be located so as to prohibit permanent structures, equipment or similar objects from being used to climb the barriers. tion AG 105.2, Items 1 through 7, and shall be equipped to AG105.5 Barrier exceptions. Spas or hot tubs with a safety accommodat~a lockingxte~ice. Pedestrian ~tccess .gates .............................. cover which coinp~s with A~T1VI F 1346, as h~ted m Section shall open outward away from the pool and shall be self- AG107, shall be exempt from the provisions of this appendix. closing and have a self-latching device. Gates other than 10. pedestrian access gates shall have a self-latching device. Where the release mechanism of the self-latching device is located less than 54 inches (1372 mm) from the bottom of the gate, the release mechanism and openings shall comply with the following: 8.1. The release mechanism shall be located on the pool side of the gate at least 3 inches (76 mm) below the top of the gate, and 8.2. The gate and barrier shall have no opening greater than 0.5 inch (12.7 mm) within 18 inches (457 mm) of the release mechanism. 9. Where a wall of a dwelling serves as part of the barrier one of the following conditions shall be met: 9.1. The pool shall be equipped with a powered safety cover in compliance with ASTM F1346; or 9.2. All doors with direct access to the pool through that wall shall be equipped with an alarm which pro- duces an audible warning when the door and its screen, if present, are opened. The alarm shall Sound continuously for a minimum of 30 seconds immedi- ately after the door is opened'and be capable of being heard throughout the house during normal house- hold activities. The alarm shall automatically reset under all conditions. The alarm system shall be equipped with a manual means, such as touchpad or switch, to temporarily deactivate the alarm for a single opening. Such deactivation shall last for not more than 15 seconds. The deactivation switch(es) shall be located at least 54 inches (1372 mm) above the threshold of the door; or ---9~3. Other fii~a'n's 6f prOte~ti6n; such as self-closing doors with self-latching devices, which are approved by the governing body, shall be acceptable so long as the degree of protection afforded is not less than the protection afforded by Item 9.1 or 9.2 described above. Where an aboveground pool structure is used as a barrier or where the barrier is mounted on top of the pool struc- ture, and the means of access is a ladder or steps, then: i0. i, T'ne iadder Or steps Shall be Capable of being secured, locked or removed to prevent access, or SECTION AG106 ABBREVIATIONS AG106.1 General. ANSI--American National Standards Institute 11 West 42nd Street, New. York, NY 10036 ASTM--American Society for Testing and Materials 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103 NSPI National Spa and Pool Institute 2111 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 SECTION AG107 STANDARDS AG107.1 General. ANSI/NSPI ANSI/NSPI-3 Standard for Permanently Installed Residential Spas ........................... AG104.1 ANSI/NSPI-4 Standard for Above-ground/On-ground Residential Swimming Pools ................. AG103.2 ANSI/NSPI-5 Standard for Residential In-ground Swimming Poots .......................... AG103.1 ANSI/NSPI-6 Standard for Residential Portable Spas ............................. AG104.2 ASTM ASTM F 1346-91 Standard Performance Specifications for Safety Covers and Labeling Requirements for All Covers for Swimming Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs ........................ AG105.2, AG105.5 sns -2541 - 2000 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE'" SWIMMING POOL FENCING SURVEY This information was acquired through an e-mail survey and/or researching City Codes from various cities. These cities require fencing and do not make allowance for pool covers alone: Hopkins New Hope Northfield Rosemount Lakeville Lino Lakes Owatonna Vadnais Heights Mounds View Waconia Anoka Chanhassen Maple Grove ^ndover Inver Grove Heights Minneapolis Many responders included concems about the issue of "human error" and consistency of covering the pool. Plymouth includes "fencing or other effective means, including but not limited to walls or buildings". Stillwater code reads: "All swimming pools must be provided with safeguards to prevent children from gaining uncontrolled access. This may be accomplished with a cover, fencing, screening, or other enclosure or any combination thereof of sufficient density and strength as to be impenetrable." Hutchinson allows latchable cover in lieu of fencing. "No swimming pool or spa shall be constructed or maintained which is not enclosed with a fence or wall as described in the foregoing divisions or a latchable cover. The cover shall be constructed of a material which cannot be penetrated by toddlers." -2542- 'pool ~ -2543- AQUAMATIC COVER SYSTEMS Why choose a HYDRAMATICTM automatic poOl cover? On the surface, most pool covers look similar but the most important a~d costlY part 0~n? p°Q!...~0ver is the mechanism: And the patented mechanism of the HYDRAMATICTM represents the best value for your durable investment. Designed to last the lifetime of your pool, the I-1YDRAMATICTM is maintenance free, and the most reliable cover sys- tem manufactured with the most,extensive warranty in the industry today: * Uniquefluid drive dual motor is fully submersible · No electrics near thepool-powerpack (pump) can beplaced up to 150feet away · Quick and easy to open - takes just 30 seconds on average · Trouble free slider system - the cover closes square every time · Installation on mostpool types and shapes · Leaves and debris are collected when the cover is opened to remove rainwater · Saves money on chemicals, energy and water loss from evaporation · Pressure relief valves gently stop the cover at end of travel · 20 year limited warranty on the mechanism Remove rainwater in minutes The patented dual-motor hydraulics of the ttYDRAMATICTM system is a favorite with many award-winning swimming pool builders and highly respected for its reliability and flexibility..This unique fluid drive system, developed and patented in the early nineties, uses two hydraulic motors: one for retraction and the other for extension of the cover across the pool, thereby eliminating all mechanical clutch- es, shearpins, and braking systems. These same hydraulic components, also used extensively in the aviation and marine industries, create a totally submersible automatic pool cover system. Highly innovative, the company pioneered and introduced many other automatic cover features common on all major pool covers today such as remote control, safety keylock, limit switches to stop the cover at end of travel, and leading edge slider system, to name a few. The company has available., a new flush track The bench option doubles as a seating area at pool equipment ?2545 A New Concept in Easy-to-Use Manual Safety Covers 'orld's only manual safety cover that can be opened and closed easily from' one position Many choices of fabric colors Navy Blue 1 Teal 5 Royal Blue * 2 Green 6 NoTM you can have all the safety and cost savings of an automatic pool cover at a cost effective price. EZ CoverTM looks and moves like an automatic cover but without the hydraulic mechanism, at about half the price. The effortless opera tion takes only about 70 secorids to open and close the cover. It's so easy you'll use it daily to keep your pool safely covered anytime it is not in use. EZ CoverTM comes complete with a five year fabriC warranty and life- time mechanism warranty. Black 9 Charcoal Gray * 10 Light Blue 3 Tan 7 Gray 11 -2546- All colors standard on HydramaticTM Colors marked with * standard on EZ CoverTM suitable for al/pool shapes For rectangular pools Installation alternatives-for- Installation alternatives-for. Installation alternatives for TOP TRACKS FLUSH TRACKS UNDER TRACKS Installation alternative for track/drive mechanism Technical Specifications Mechanism Drive unit 2 hydraulic torque motors Open and close switch Key-lock switch Powerpack (pump) Electrics 110/220-240v-60/50 75-1.5 HP IIL, CSA, CE approved Hydraulic oil ATF Normal working pressure 800 psi ( 40-56 bar) Limit switches Pressure relief valves Cover fabric Material PVC on re-inforced polyester scrim Fabric weight 16 oz/sq, yd. 12 in 30 in (300 mm) Track Space (750 mm) ICoWarranty ~ 20 Year limited warranty 1[[ ver fabric: 7years Prorated ll[ For specific delmolc~l~r~llpYreOs~n~U~vtheorized dealer or JJ/ 13 in 13 in J, (330mm) ,J For non-rectangular pools and I2 -2547- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: PC Case: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 15, 2005 Review of Floodplain Alteration / WCA Permit Applications for 5351 Three Points Boulevard 05-57 Background. The applicants, Thomas and Heidi Niccum, have submitted floodplain alteration and Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) permits for the property located at 5351 Three Points Boulevard. The permits are required to allow for construction of a new single-family home on the property. As the Planning Commission may recall, the subject lot(s) are part of the minor subdivision and variance approved for William Stoddard of Minnetonka Enterprises in 2003. A copy of Resolution No. 03-03 has been included. Floodplain Alteration Regulations. The 100-year floodplain elevation in the City of Mound is 931.0. City Code Chapter 300.13, Subd 4 (b) states that the placement of fill in the flood fdnge shall result in a no-net decrease in 100-year flood storage. In the event the floodplain compensation cannot be accommodated on-site, it must be accomplished on the same waterbody and in an appropriate location approved by the City. Required Flood Protection Elevation. The Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) for the City of Mound is 933.00. Floodplain regulations require that the lowest floor of all structures, including basements and crawl spaces, must be constructed at or above the RFPE. TEP Wetland Boundary. The wetland boundary as determined by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) was approved by the City Council at its July 9, 2002 meeting and is referenced on the survey(s) submitted by the applicant(s). Permit Review Process. Any and/or all activities which disturb the floodplain requires issuance of a Floodplain Alteration Permit which requires formal review by Staff and approval by the City Council. According to City Policy, the City Council may remand Floodplain Alteration Permit applications to the Planning Commission for review and comment, when appropriate. As the City Council may recall, similar applications for the lots located at 5331 and 5341 Three Points Boulevard were remanded to the Planning Commission by the City Council for review pdor to formal -2548- action on the application. Therefore, the current aPplication was processed in the same manner. Project Details. The applicant(s) is proposing to fill 158 cubic feet below the 931.0 floodplain elevation and is proposing to provide 158 cubic feet of floodplain compensation on the West and east sides of the subject lot. The proposed work is associated with construction of a new single-family home. Notification. Mailed notification was sent to all property owners within (600) feet of the subject site on or around August 5, 2005 for compliance with the policies contained in the Mound Surface Water Management Plan and MCWD Rule A. Public Agency Distribution - Permit Application. The applicant provided copies of the permit application materials to the MCWD, DNR, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as required by the Combined Joint Notification Form - Water Resource Application . Additionally, copies of the application(s) were forwarded to involved public agencies on July 11,2005 for review and comment by the City of Mound. 1991 Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Permit. The approved Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) wetland delineation boundary has been included on the submitted survey(s). No Loss Certificate. As no fill is to be placed on the subject property, administrative approval of a "No Loss Certificate" can be authorized and will be undertaken by the City of Mound. Refer to email from MFRA Soil Scientist Todd UIIom regarding WCA approval. City Review Process and Timeline. The application was received and deemed to be complete on June 29, 2005. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve a land use request unless an extension is executed. The deadline for City action on the application(s) is on or around August 27, 2006. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all applicable City departments for review and comment. All written comments received to date have been summarized below: Building Official (Waldron & Associates) Soils test(s) may be required at time of foundation inspection(s). · Page 2 -2549- Comm. Dev. Director Smith Foundation survey(s) will be required to vedfy compliance with approved building permit survey(s). City policy also requires submittal of an as-built survey. Parks Supt. Fackler No comments. Public Works Supt. Skinner Refer to any comments received from PW Director and City Engineer. Police Dept. Chief No comments. Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the floodplain alteration permit(s) subject to the following conditions: a. Verification of the floodplain fill / compensation calculations by the City Engineer for compliance with the floodplain regulations. Silt fence to be installed along the boundary of all impacted work area(s). The silt fence must be positioned to protect the wetland and adjacent property and will need to be maintained until the turf is re-established. c. All bare area(s) shall be revegetated within (14) days after rough grading to reduce the potential for soil erosion and sediment loads to the wetland d. The turf restoration must be completed within one week after the excavation and final grading associated the new home is finished. e. A signed as-built survey by a professional engineer / surveyor must be submitted. f. All fees incurred by the City as part of the floodplain alteration shall be paid by the applicant. g. Submittal of a $500.00 erosion control escrow deposit (per lot) shall be required. In the event the floodplain alteration activities are undertaken separately from the construction of the new single-family home, a separate grading permit shall be required including the payment of all fee(s). '® Page 3 -2550- i. The applicant shall comply to the extent required with the provisions of Section 300.15, Subd. 5 of the City Code. j. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of MCWD Rule B. Planning Commission Recommendation. The application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 8th meeting who unanimously voted to recommend approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff. A draft resolution has been prepared. · Page 4 -2551 - MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 2005 CASE ~5-57 FLOODPLAIN/WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION 5351 THREE POINTS BLVD - THOMAS & HEIDI NlCCUM The applicants are proposing to fill 158 cubic feet below the 931.0 floodplain elevation and are proposing to provide 158 cubic feet of floodplain compensation on the west and east sides of the subject lot. The proposed work is associated with construction of a new single-family Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the following conditions: 1. Verification of the floodplain fill/compensation calculations by the City Engineer for compliance with the floodplain regulations. 2. Silt fence to be installed along the boundary of all impacted work area. The silt fence must be positioned to protect the wetland and adjacent property and will need to be maintained until the turf is re-established. 3. All bare areas shall be re-vegetated within 14 days after rough grading to reduce the potential for soil erosion and sediment loads to the wetland. 4. The turf restoration must be completed within one week after the excavation and final grading associated the new home is finished. 5. A signed as-built survey by a professional engineer/surveyor must be submitted. 6. All fees incurred by the City as part of the floodplain alteration shall be paid by the applicant. 7. Submittal of a $500 erosion control escrow deposit (per lot) shall be required. 8. In the event the floodplain alteration activities are undertaken separately from the construction of the new single-family home, a separate grading permit shall be required including the payment of all fees. 9. The applicant shall comply to the extent required with the provisions of Section 300.15, Subd. 5 of the City Code. 10. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of MCWD Rule B. MOTION by Ayaz, seconded by Burma, approve staff recommendation. MOTION approved unanimously. -2552- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND APPROVING THE FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION PERMIT (MCWD RULE C) AND · CERTIFICATE OF WETLAND EXEMPTION FROM THOMAS AND HEIDI NlCCUM FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5351 THREE POINTS BOULEVARD PID NO. 13-117-24-22-0285 WHEREAS, permitting responsibilities for floodplain alteration (MCWD Rule C) were transferred from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to the City of Mound on August 22, 2002 following approval of the Mound Surface Water Management Plan by the MCWD Board of Managers; and WHEREAS, the applicants, Thomas and Heidi Niccum, have a purchase agreement to acquire the property located at 5351 Three Points Boulevard and have requested approval of a floodplain alteration permit from the City of Mound to place 158 cubic feet of fill below the 931.0 floodplain elevation and will provide compensation in the amount of 158 cubic feet; and WHEREAS, a "no net loss" wetland exemption certificate is being requested as no fill materials are being placed in the delineated wetland which was established by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) and formally adopted by the Mound City Council on July 9, 2002; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 300.13 Subd 4 (b) states that the placement of fill in the flood fringe shall result in a no-net decrease in 100-year flood storage; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules 8420.0122, Subd. 9 (4) states that a "No Loss" wetland exemption certificate can be issued by the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) if no fill is being placed in a wetland; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound is the Local Governmental Unit (LGU) for administration of the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act; and -2553- WHEREAS, the floodplain and wetland permit application(s) and compensation calculations were reviewed by the City Engineer who has verified that the placement of fill and excavation activities result in a no-net decrease in 100-year flood storage; and WHEREAS, the applicant's registered engineer submitted a wetland delineation survey for the property which was reviewed by MFRA Soil Scientist Todd UIIom who has verified that no fill is being placed in the wetland, therefore, a "no loss" wetland exemption certificate can be issued for the propertY; and WHEREAS, Staff has recommended approval of the floodplain alteration permit and wetland exemption certificate subject to conditions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: The floodplain alteration permit and wetland exemption certificate are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. Verification of the floodplain fill / compensation calculations by the City Engineer for compliance with the floodplain regulations. Silt fence to be installed along the boundary of all impacted work area(s). The silt fence must be positioned to protect the wetland and adjacent property and will need to be maintained until the turf is re-established. c. All bare area(s) shall be revegetated within (14) days after rough grading to reduce the potential for soil erosion and sediment loads to the wetland d. The turf restoration must be completed within one week afterthe excavation and final grading associated the new home is finished. e. A signed as-built survey by a professional engineer/ surveyor must be submitted. f. All fees incurred by the City as part of the floodplain alteration shall be paid by the applicant. g. Submittal of a $500.00 erosion control escrow deposit (per lot) shall be required. -2554- In the event the floodplain alteration activities are undertaken separately from the construction of the new single-family home, a SeParate grading permit shall be required including the payment of all fee(s). i. The applicant shall comply to the extent required with the provisions of Section 300.15, Subd. 5 of the City Code. j. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of MCWD Rule B. k. Applicant is responsible for any personal damage to any neighboring properties during the building, grading and construction on this site I. Fill material shall not be stored during the construction of this property within the wetland protected areas. The floodplain alteration permit and wetland exemption certificate are hereby approved for the following legally described property included as Exhibit A and graphically depicted as referenced on Exhibit B. The applicant shall be responsible for recording this resolution with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1 and shall be responsible for paying for all such costs of recording. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. Evidence of such recording shall be provided to the City. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of August, 2005 Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 3 -2555- 9524720620 CI"['Y OF MOt.TN'D ~002 COMBINED JOINT NOTIFICATION FORM .. WATER RESOURCE APPLICATION Use this form to noUfylapply to the City of Mound, their engineering consultants, the DNR, and tile Minnehaha Creek Watershed District of a proposed water/wetland project or work that falls within their jurisdiction. These agencies should advise you of their requirements within 10 days. Fill out this form completely and mail a copy, with plan, maps, arc.. to the City of Mound, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364. Keep a copy for your records. YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED AUTHORIZATIONS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK, APPLICANT NAME APPLICANT ADDRESS PROJECT ADDRESS PROP~ hD. NUMBER L~G~ OF SHORE AFFECTED CITY STATE ZIP CITY STATE ZIP VOLUME OF FILL OR EXCAVATION (CY) AREA FILLED OR EXCAVATED IS ACRES, OR SQUARE FEET. ' TYPE OF PERMIT BEING APPUED FOR; (Check all that apply) ~ FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION [] STORM SEWER OUTFALLS APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: (Licensed Contractor, Engineer, etc) ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PROJECT PURPOSE (Why is this project needed -what benefits will it provide?) ALTERNATIVES (~be any other sites or methods that could be used to achieve the purpose of your project while avoiding or minimizing water/wetland impacts. Attach additional sheets, if needed. DATES: Proposed start of ~--'~ty: Proposed completion: . (Identify any completed work on attached drawing.) NAMES & ADDRESSES OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS (Attach list if more) PERMITS HAVE BEI=N RECEIVED ® OR APPLIED FOR (A) FROM DNR ~ ~ COUNTY CITY ~ MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ARMY CORPS OF ENGR ! hereby notify the recipients of this form of the project proposed heroin and request I be advised of any permits or other determinations concerning this project that I must obtain. I undemtand that proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may be subject to Federal, State and/or local administrative, civil and/or criminal penalties. ~.-~_ .4 $ignat~e of Person ProPosing Project or Agent Date -2556- 06/29/2005 14:04 F.~T. 9524720620 CITYOP ~OUND ~003 INSTRUCTIONS - PLEASE READ CAREFULLY A copy of this form, with copies of all plans, drawings, etc. should be sent to each agency indicated below. Please check the appropriate spa~ to show eye,em you are sending this form. Remember to keep a copy for your records. ~ Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) )/'-Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Regional Office ~ US Army Corps of Engineem (ACOE) at:. Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engincc. m, St. Paul ' Di~ ~ A'I-I'N: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East, St. Paul, MN 55t 01~'t638 Note: The agencies above may provide a copy of your completed form to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). MPCA water quality issues may apply to your proposed project. ATTENTION {from USDA): Any activity including drainage, dredging, filling, leveling or other manipulations, including maintenance, may affect a land user's eligibility for USDA benefits under the 1985 Food Security Act as amended. Check with your local USDA office to request and complete Form AD-1026 prior to initiating activity. IMPORTANT: Some agencies, including the Corps of Engineers and the MDNR accept this form as a permit application form. If you wish this form to constitute an applim~tion to the Corps and/or MDNR for any necessary permits for your projects please carefully read the following information and sign where indicated. Application is hereby made for a permit to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am fam~iar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is tn JO, complete and accurate. I further certify that i possess the authority to undertake the proposed activity or I am acting as the duly authorized agent of the Sign~ure of Applicant Date Signatuh.:-,/of Applicant Date Note: The person who desires to undertake the proposed activity must sign the application (Applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the information requested below is provide. Agent's Name & TrUe: Agent's Address: Agent's Telephone: 18 u.s.c. SeClion 1001 provides thal: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdicUon of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trlc~, scheme, or device a material faa or makes any false, ficl~ious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing document knowing same to contain any false, fic~titious, or fi-audulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. -2557- 06/29/2005 14:04 FAX 9524720620 CZTY OF MOI~D ~004 APPLICANT ~LND PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION ~tr~t' Address City, State, Zip PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION D~scrib~ the nature and purpos~ of tl~ proposed project: (attach addifiot~ png~ if needed) ~e wcfl~ acfi~ at ~e above a~ q~ifi~ for the foHo~g ~d~ ~e Wetl~d Con~~ A~ ~) (ch~k ~e): No ~ss De~afion (~chpl~s) n~sn~ to show ~al~Hon for the ~tion D~p~on of Ex~p~on APPLICANT SIGNAT~P~ The information provided for this det~,'mlnation is truthful and accurate to thc best of my knowlexlge. I crlstfi-e that, iii draining, excavating, or filling the subject wetland under mi exemption noted above; appropriate erosion control measures will be taken to prevc'nt sedimentation of the water; the dr~i% excavation, or fill will not block fish passag~;'and the ~.' excavation, or fill activity will be conducted in compliancc with all other applicable fexiexal, state, and local requi_~meuts; including best max~gement p 'ocs tcr rcsourc~ protection requirements established under 1Vfinnc~ota Statutes, Chapter 103H. (Si~ ~ o' Applicaut) (Dat~) 121 -2558- 06/29/2005 14:05 FAX 9524720620 CI'I~Z OF MO~'D ~005 .Note: Titis apl~ro~l is not effect~ until the signatures below are complete. No work shmdd begln untlt ~e SO-day appeal' lapse, d,.or, in ttae event qf an appeal, untll tire appeal has be,~ j~nalL~L *APPRO_V_AL OF ~ C~RT1FICAT~ ONL YAPPLi~,$ To THE }~YCA, Permits.from local, state~.and federal agencies may required. Check with the appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. The Combined Project can be u~ed for thi~ purpose. Notice of the above decision must be mni.Ied t~ ~he following par~.es wRhin 10 working days of the decision: Lanctown~/Applicanf Memb~ of the T. cc~nleal Ev-a~uation Panel Watershed District or Watershed Managemvn~ Org~,i~,ation (If .Applicable) D~partment of Natural Kesouro .cs Regional Office DlqR Wetlands Coordinat~ (~ Bcologica~ Sm-vices Section 500 Lafay~zt~ Road, Box 25 St. ?aul, MN 55155 Corps of Bnginc~ Project Manager ~ D=pa~ Uaeat of thc Army, Corps of Engi~ecrs, St. Paul District ATTN: CO-tL 190 Fiffi~ Street East St. Paul, ~ 55101-1638 Mea'nb~ oft_ha publio who have re, qur, st~ to receive notice. Appli~tion for Cer~ca~e of No Loss or EXeml~don Page2 of 2 -2559- (npri~ ~0o~) Default Page 1 of 2 H Recenter on click (t) Yes C::' No Hennepin County Property Map Last update: 8/11/2005 at 3:30 PM - READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Click for detailed information on this .parcel Property ID Approximate Property Approximate Property Perimeter Area 13-117-24-22-0285 522 ft. 15,277 sq,ff. = 0,35 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2005) 5351 THREE POINTS BLVD MOUND, MN 55364 $109,000 $797.74 , Give us your feedbac Hennepin County Su How to use Map Lot dimensions are availal For quicker respon., information on surf, 'Recenter on click'. Show: (~) Aerial Photos Off (i~i) 2004* Aerials On [] City Names [] Street Names [] Address Number *Mpls. aedals south of Fran from 2003 The data contained on this page are derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can onl licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. Th purposes only, Hennepln County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any mi,. derivatives, Please report any map discrepancies to the Hennepin County Survey Division via e-mail at Surveyor, Haps@co. hennepil The quality of the display may be Influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at Z024x768 or highe~ Explorer 3,02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation, Home I Vo,,r County ~overnment I Licenses, Certificates, & Registration I Employment & VolunteerinqI Health, Housing, & Social Services J Law, Public Safety, & Courts J Environment, Property, & Transportation Copyright (D 2005 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepin.us http://www ~ 3.c~hennepin.mn.us/pub~icparce~`2`-5~6~J~fau~t.aspx?PID=~3 ~ ~ 72422~285 8/15/2005 I I i I I I I /o'o~ k ~ Ii _ ./ ,J / I M/,,c~g ,/-~'o~'0 S ....... / / Ob. -2~61- PAUL LARSON WEST LOT FILL BELOW 931.0 FLOOD PLAIN 0' 920 4- S.F. > 158 C.F. ,~, 0.3' 130 4- S.F. 158 C.F. COMPENSATING CUT TO CREATE FLOOD PLAIN EAST sIDE DEPTH AREA INCR. VOL. 0' 230 4- S.F. 0.3' 65 4- S.F. > 44 C.F. 44 C.F. WEST SIDE DEPTH AREA INCR. VOL. 0' 370 4- S.F. 0.4' 200 4- S.F. > 114 C.F. 114 C.F.' TOTAL COMPENSATING CUT = 158 C.F. -2562- CITY OF MOUND HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS '(IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) oWNER $ NAME: Ii , ...... ...~L~...._~~ ..... ~ ~.~.~', ........... .LOT AREA /~,/~O SQ, ~, X 30% = (for all lots) .............. LOT AREA ' SQ;'~;"'X'4G%--=""(fot"EO'tS 0~'R~'drde) I' SQ, FT;.X 15%' (for deta'Ched buil~lings only) , I I * Exi~_stin_g L__ots of ~e__c_o_r_d_ ma~, hays_ 4_0_ .pe_rcent c~oyer~g_e_ provided that techniques are utilized~ as outlin.ed..in Zon!ng 0rd!n. an. ce Sect. ion350. ~',12'25,'Su'.bd:'.6, B.':.l,'('see back);' A p'lah' m'us~ 15e'§ulsmit'(ed and approved by the Building Official, ~I~ENGT~H ........ WIDTH ~ SQ" FT ' '~ ...... x = · 2/77 HOUSE X ~ X ~ ....... T~TAL-.HOUSE . DETACHED BLDGS X = (GABAGE/SHED). X TOTAL DETACHED BLDGS ................. · DRIVEWAY, PARKING ~/~' -C X = /~ 'AREA$~.'-StDEWAEI~S7 ':" ':'"" "' 'X ...... = .... .... ETC, ' .......× ........ = TQTAL DRIVEWAY.., ETC .................. · ......... TOTAL DECK X X ~ DECKS Open deck~ (114' rain, opening between boards) with pervioue eurfece under are not counted as hardcover OTHER TOTAL-'OTHER TI~-~AL. HAR.DC. OVER.t IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .............. C,~.~ OVER (indicate difference.).-= .,-, ~.,-r; '~..~ ..~ ;-~..,..,., .... '.PREPARED BY' ..-6:;:.A'~',,~'.¢,~¢' ~ ,4'J'j'oc,/41'e".,r',, /,~,.,/¢. . ......... DATE -2563- Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: "Todd UIIom" <tullom@mfra.com> To: <Sarahsmith@cityofmound.com> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:51 PM Subject: 5351 Three Points Blvd WCA "No Loss" Certificate Sarah, I've reviewed the proposed site plan for 5351 Three Points Blvd. The wetland boundary was delineated and approved by the TEP members in 2002/2003. According to the site plan they will not be encroaching into the wetland. They are proposing silt fencing for erosion control. Based on this information 1 approve of the "No Loss" certificate with the condition that they vegetate the bare areas within 14 days after rough grading to reduce the potential for soil erosion and sediment loads to the wetland. Thanks, Todd Todd Ullom McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 14800 28th Avenue North Suite 140 Plymouth, MN 55447 763.476.6010 (office) 763-259-6015 (direct) 763.476-8532 (fax) 612.423.4107 (cell) tullorn@mfra.com -2564- . 8/2/2005 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-30604 Memorandum From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Comm. Dev. Director August 17, 2005 Gillespie Center Parking Lot Expansion Proposal Summary. Representatives of the Gillespie Center have submitted a request to the City Council regarding a proposed expansion to their parking lot. As the Council may be aware, the Center purchased the adjacent property to the west in 2004 and are planning to utilize the property for parking purposes. Discussion. The subject property is currently zoned R-2 and B-1. The applicable portion(s) of the recently-acquired parcel will need to be rezoned so as to accommodate the proposed use. In the event it has not yet been done, the subject property will need to be tax- combined at Hennepin County. City Code requires specific standards for commercial parking lots (ie. curbing, striping, surfacing, etc.) It is Staff's understanding that the Gillespie Center would like the Council to consider allowing the parking lot to be graded and "soft surfaced" for an intedm period due to funding issues. Stormwater issues associated with the parking lot expansion will need to be addressed. The "corner property" is not included in the current parking lot plans, however, it is Staff's understanding that the Gillespie has a "dght of first refusal" with the current owners. If appropriate, Staff will assist the Gillespie Center with the rezoning application. Gillespie Center will be responsible for all involved fees and/or consultant(s) costs unless waived by the City Council. The Public Works Department has offered to assist the Gillespie Center with preliminary site preparation / restoration activities. These activities will be coordinated through Public Works Director Cadton Moore and Superintendent Greg Skinner. -2565- The City received the attached letter and plan from Sharon Cook regarding the expansion of their parking lot at the Gillespie Center. John Cameron and I have reviewed the proposed plan and have submitted comments to them. We feel there are some hurdles that need to be addressed before this can proceed. They have been very good to work with but they do not have any money to put towards the parking lot at this time. Their proposal is to grade it in accordance with the plan and cover it with rock and leave it for a year. The idea is to let the base settle and then pave it in 2006 hoping they have more money by then to pave it ( no guarantee ). They also want to drop the concrete C & G until the larger parking lot can be included with this one. This raises another issue and that is the proposed plan does not work with any future plan which incorporates the entire comer property. The biggest issue I believe is that they need additional parking and do not have the funds to purchase the adjacent property or pay for the new parking lot as is required by code with paving, C & G. They are asking for the City to consider waiving these requirements and allow for a phased implementation. I suggest we discuss this before proceeding. Carlton -2566- To: Candice Hanson Mound City Manager From: Sharon Cook Gillespie Center Date: 17-April-2005 RE: Bartlett Lot Development Dear Candice: We have received extensive plans regarding our vacant land and the future development of the land. The plans received are well beyond our means. We are asking the Mound City Counsel to consider an alternate plan which we have discussed in detail with the city staff. This altemate plan better suits our plans for this development and our budget. The alternate plan that your staff has proposed is reasonable and we sincerely request that the plan be accepted by the council. Thank you for your time and consideration, Kind regards, Sharon Cook ' -2567- MEMORANDUM DATE: MARCH 28, 2005 TO: CARLTON MOORE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FROM: JOHN CAMERON, CITY ENGINEER SLrBJECT:GILLESPIE CENTER PARKING LOT EXPANSION I have reviewed the preliminary parking lot grading plan and have the following comments and mcommendati°ns: 1. The storm S~Wer should be extended and two catch basins added in the driveway to Bartlett Blvd. (CSAH 125). I also looked at the possibility of running the proposed stOrm sewer to the County main in Commerce Blvd.(CSAH 110); however this line appears to be too high to pick up the entire new parking lot. It may be possible to connect C.B.M.H. 101 and 102, but not C.B.103. The County line discharges into the ditch that runs between Lake Langdon and Lost Lake. The size of the pipe in 110 would need to be checked for capacity and of course permits would be required from Hennepin County. 2. Storm Water Management Permit. It appears that the plan would only need to meet the BMP's. This would l~robably mean that the storm sewer structures will need to have sumps and skimmers. Because of the small size, neither rate control or treatment would not be required. 3. A staged improvement schedule brings up additional concerns if the lot were to only have a gravel surface for any length of time. A problem could occur at the entrance to Bartlett Blvd. with gravel washing into the street, since the entire lot drains that direction. An entrance permit fi'om Hennepin County will be required. This was only a cursory review, so there may be additional items that will need to be addressed. 16050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 -2568- JCAMERON~MFRA.COM (763)476-6010 FAX (763) 476-8532 NOISN'~'dX] 109 ONI)ti~Vd ~31N30 31dS3-lgiO VIOS3NNII, N '¥.LSI~LI2NNI¢~ (Co. T ~ O) I ---6~26. -2569- oooooooooo~ oooooooooooooooM o ~ 0 w D X -- mw ~o-~ z~~=z~o~ 0 wO~O~z ~w >>>>~ ~ ~ ~ >~>~ ~E~oooo-o ~ ~ ~ wwww ~ODmm O0 z~ -2570- ~,,,,.<<,<.,<,,bb~, ~Z ~ ~~= -2571 - Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 1 of 2 Search Blt: Property ID.: i23!7724.74.0!..39 .......... Hennepin nty, M Property Information Search The Hennepin County Property Tax web datat daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9:: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable This parcel is enrolled in the Direct Debit Property ID: Address: Municipali{l~: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: program and the taxes will be automati 23-117-24-14-0139 5680 BARTLETT BLVD MOUND 277 Constru, 3 Approx. P THE GILLESPIE CENTER THE GILLESPIE CENTER 2590 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Znformat Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value arms-length transactions. Sale Date: September, 2003 Sale Price: $150,000 Transaction Type: Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: MOUND BAY PARK OO9 LOTS 4 THRU 6 INCL AND S 1/2 OF LO 44 THRU 46 INCL Abstract or Torrens: TORRENS Value and Tax Summary for Taxes P; Values Established by Assessor as of 3a Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: $31,000 $31,000 $31,000 $806.96 $4.94 http ://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult.- 2572 -2311724140139&caller=link 8/17/2005 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Total Tax: $811.90 Property Information Detail for Taxes Values Established by Assessor as of Ja Land Market Building Market Machinery Market Land Limited Building Limited Values: $30,000 $1,ooo Total Market: $31,000 $30,000 $1,ooo Total Limited: $31,000 Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status COMHERCIAL- PREFERRED NON-HOMESTEAD 12822 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Tax related questions: taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Need help locating a property on our site? Check out our Search Tips Home I Your County Government [ Licenses, Certificates, & Registration I Emplo Social Services I Law, Public Safety, 8, Courts I Environment, Prooerty, & Transp Copyright © 2004 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepin.us Accessibility Policy I Contact Hennepin County I Security/Privacy Statement http://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/pidresult.- 2573-2311724140139&caller=link 8/17/2005 Default Page 1 of 2 Recenter on click (,~)Yes Hennepin County Property Map Last update: 8/11/2005 at 3:30 PM - READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Click for detailed information on this parcel Property ID Approximate Property Approximate Property Perimeter Area 23-117-24-14-0139 444 ft. 10,693 sq.ft. = 0.25 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2005) 5680 BARTLETT BLVD MOUND, MN 55364 $31,000 $811.90 Give us your feedbac Hennepin County Su How to use Map Lot dimensions are avallal For quicker respon., information on surr, 'Recenter on click'. Show: '? Aerial Photos Off (~) 2004* Aerials On [] City Names [] Street Names [] Address Number *Mpls. aedals south of Fran from 2003 Lot lines different fro~ The data contained on this page are derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can onl licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. Th purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any mi~ derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to the Hennepin County Survey Division via e-mail at Surveyor, Maps@co.hennepil The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 1024x768 or highe~ Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.0! or later version for proper operation. Home I Your County Government I Licenses, Certificates, & Registration I Employment & Volunteerincj I Health, HousJnq, & Social Services j Law, Public Safety, & Courts I Environment, Property, & Transportation Copyright (D 2005 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepin.us http://wwwl 3.co.hennepin.mn.us/publicparceli- 2574- fault, aspx?PID=2311724110033 8/17/2005 Default Page 1 of 2 H Recenter on click (~) Xes ~ ~No Hennepin County Property Map Last update: 8/11/2005 at 3:30 PM -- READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Click for detailed information on this parcel Property ID Approximate Property Approximate Property Perimeter Area 23-117-24-14-0139 444 ff. 10,693 eq.ff. = 0.25 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2005) 5680 BARTLETT BLVD MOUND, MN $31,000 $811.90 55364 Give us your feedba( Hennepin County Su How to use Map Lot dimensions are availat For quicker respon., information on surr, 'Recenter on click'. Show: (~) Aerial Photos Off (~) 2004* Aerials On [] City Names [] Street Names [] Address Number *Mpls. aedals south of Fran from 2003 The data contained on this page are derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can onl licensed land surveyor, The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. Th purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and Is not responsible for any mi,, derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to the Hennepin County Survey Division via e-mall at Surveyor. Maps(~co.hennepil The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and Is best viewed at 1024x768 or highe~ Explorer 3,02 or Netscape 2,0~. or later version for proper operation, Home J Your County Government j Licenses, Certificates, & Registration i Employment &volunteering I Health, Housing, & Social Services I Law, Public Safety, & Courts J Environment, Property, & Transportation Copyright (D 2.005 Hennepin County, Minnesota J www. Hennepin.us http://www 13.co.hennepin.mn.us/publicparceli- 25_ 75- fault.aspx?PID=2311724110033 8/17/2005 $ O0/day $300/yr. LICENSE ~ Dance CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC DANCE/LIVE MUSIC PERMIT APPLICATION EVENT: LOCATION OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: TYPE OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC: TIME PERIOD OF DANCE/LIVE MUSIC '~/'0 ~/-n9 (HOURS PERMITTED: Mon-Sat: 8pm-12:30am-Sufiday: 8pm- 11:30pm) CHAIRPERSON OR x . APPLICANT: ADDRESS: TITLE: ADDRESS: HOME PHONE #: WORK PHONE #: Date HOME PHONE #: #: -2576- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 TEMPORARY ON-SALE 3.2 MALT LIQUOR PERMIT Address of Event: .,~,~"~ Chairperson of Organization: Address: Home Phone: Work Phone: Minnesota State Statute 340A.403 - 3.2 percent malt liquor license Subd. 2. Temporary licenses. (a) A club or charitable, religious, or nonprofit organization may be issued a temporary on-sale license for the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor. (b) The temporary license may authorize the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor in any school or school buildings. (c) Temporary licenses are subject to the terms set by the issuing county or city. State Statute does not require additional insurance for temporary 3.~cent mal~enses, f Date Ap~a~-s Si~ Date Approval - City Clerk Date Approval - Police Dept. -2577- $25/day Permit Fee for non,profit orgs, , ~ ' :LICENSE CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR PERMIT Event: (~'~¢-4~5> Date(s) and time of Event: ~ ~ (~-~--' Address of Event (,describe premises to be used for temDorar3/license): , Chairperson of Organization: ~,~/ ~~~ Address: Home Phone: Work Phone: Minnesota State Statute 340A.404 Subd. 10. Temporary on-sale licenses. The governing body of a municipality may issue to (1) a club or charitable, religious, or other nonprofit organization in existence for at least three years, (2) a political committee registered under section 10A.14, or (3) a state university, a temporary l~cense for the on-sale of intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event within the municipality sponsored by the licensee. The license may authorize the on-sale of intoxicating liquor for not more than four consecutive days, and may authorize on-sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full-year on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by any municipality. The licenses are subject to the terms, including a license fee, imposed by the issuing municipality. Licenses issued under this subdivision are subject to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor except sections 340A.409 and 340A.504, subdivision 3, paragraph (d), and those laws and ordinances which by their nature are no~3_.~plicable. Licenses under this subdivision are not valid u_~nless f3i-l~t approved by the~/ commissioner of public safety. % ,,/ Date Appl~_.Signature[ - - Date Approval - Ci~ Clerk Date Approval - Police Dept. NOTE: CITY REQUIRES THAT A CITY OF MOUND OR HENNEPIN COUNTY OFFICER IS PRESENT DURING HOURS OF SERVICE. RATE: $40/HOUR WITH MINIMUM OF 2 HOURS. -2578- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT July 2005 58.33% GENERAL FUND Council Promotions City Manager/Clerk Elections Finance Assessing Legal City Hall Building & Srvcs Computer Police Emergency Prepardeness Planning/Ins pections Streets Recreation-Community Srv., Parks Cemetery Transfers Cable TV Contingencies July 2005 BUDGET EXPENSE 78 850 3 750 291 290 1 250 247 440 83 300 160 420 115 560 21 430 1,378,530 7,100 341,930 884,150 3,000 385,590 9,880 271,080 45,000 54,720 YTD PERCENT EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED 7,097 44,202 34,648 56.06% 0 3,750 0 100.00% 22,469 160,321 130,969 55.04% 0 380 870 30.40% 18,745 139,904 107,536 56.54% 15 83,244 56 99.93% 11,336 58,380 102,040 36.39% 13,618 61,776 53,884 53.41% 127 11,450 9,980 53.43% 99,506 779,827 598,703 56.57% 549 5,769 1,331 81.25% 42,183 210,771 131,159 61.64% 108,144 524,786 359,364 59.35% 0 3,000 0 100.00% 33,003 230,610 154,980 59.81% 153 1,171 8,709 11.85% 36,791 257,541 .13,539 95.01% 0 0 45,000 0.00% 0 5,500 49,220 10.05% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 4,384~370 393,736 2.582.382 1,801,988 58.90% Area Fire Service Fund 735,710 Dock Fund 166,170 Capital Projects 26,310 TIF 1-2 0 Water Fund 779,440 Sewer Fund 1,227,150 Liquor Fund 584,370 Recycling Fund 168,160 Storm Water Utility 126,630 20,755 251,160 484,550 34.14% 6,263 60,359 105,811 36.32% 268,791 734,071 (707,761) 6,653 106,053 (106,053) 65,665 430,976 348,464 55.29% 123,212 767,412 459,738 62.54% 36,296 289,795 294,575 49.59% 9,455 92,022 76,138 54.72% 4,868 49,230 77,400 38.88% Exp-2005 08/08/2005 Gino -2579- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT July 2005 58.33% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses/Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Street Lighting Fee Franchise Fees G.O. Equipment Certificates Charges to Other Dpts Other Revenue July 2005 YTD BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE 2,402,210 20 950 265 000 375 630 262 850 105 000 105 000 352 000 270 000 11 000 38,600 PERCENT VARIANCE ~ECEIVED 541,151 1,469,899 (932,311 ) 61.19% 30 18,520 (2,430) 88.40% 20,653 90,043 (174,957) 33.98% 19,595 78,577 (297,053) 20.92% 9,148 53,628 (209,222) 20.40% 6,370 52,386 (52,614) 49.89% 8,916 62,368 (42,632) 59.40% 59,534 220,932 (131,068) 62.76% 0 274,476 4,476 101.66% (62) 6,349 (4,651) 57.72% 852 19,466 (19,134) 50.43% TOTAL REVENUE 4,208,240 666,187 2,346,644 ~1.861.596) 55.76% FIRE FUND DOCK FUND MOUND HRA WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND RECYCLING FUND STORM WATER UTILITY 780,710 42,723 541,988 (238,722) 69.42% 132,740 164 127,625 (5,115) 96.15% 136,124 6,092 78,226 (57,898) 57.47% 770,000 102,999 388,921 (381,079) 50.51% 1,322,200 110,863 717,282 (604,918) 54.25% 2,200,000 230,447 1,181,321 (1,018,679) 53.70% 143,800 8,843 71,767 (72,033) 49.91% 136,320 12,795 88,207 (48,113) 64.71% 0810812005 rev2004 Gino -2580- General Fund $1,792,549 CDBG 0 Area Fire Protection Services 414,646 Dock 191,333 Mound HRA 13,668 G.O. Equip. Certf. 2004 - C 151,285 G.O. Equip. Certf. 2005 -C 3,294 G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 79,554 Commerce Place TIF (334,852) G.O. Bonds 2003 - C TIF 1-2 461,539 G.O. Bonds 2001 - A 19,596 G.O. Bonds 2003 - A 319,692 G.O. Bonds 2004 - A t95,956 G.O. Bonds 2005 - A 51,436 HRA Lease Rev Bonds (382,137) Capital Improvement 2,335,709 MSA 387,214 Sealcoat 25,549 CDB 6,123 Downtown TIF 1-2 (11,970) Downtown TIF 1-3 MH (1,230) HRA Public Safety Bldg 27,284 Water 4,820,415 Sewer 1,295,021 Liquor Store (501,773) Recycling (14,534) Storm Water 907,582 Fire Relief (52,508) Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 08~08~2005 CashReportCouncil Gino -2581 - LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 7:00 PM, Wednesday, July 27, 2005 Wayzata City Hall CALL TO ORDER Skramstad called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. ROLL CALL Members present: Tom Skramstad, Shorewood; Katy Van Hercke, Minnetonka; Tom Seuntjens, Minnetonka Beach; Paul Knudsen, Minnetdsta; John Berns, Wayzata; David Gross, Deephaven; Steve Johnson, Mound; Michael Maloney, Excelsior; Andrew McDermott, Orono; Tom Scanlon, Spring Park; Herb Suerth, Woodland. Also present: Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel; Greg Nybeck, Executive Director; Judd Harper, Administrative Technician; Emily Herman, Administrative Assistant. Members absent: Doug Babcock, Tonka Bay; Pete Nelson, Victoria; Cree Zischke, Greenwood. CHAIR ANNOUNCEMENTS, Chair Skramstad Skramstad asked Nybeck to provide an overview of the August Board meeting schedule. Nybeck stated that there are two Regular LMCD Board Meetings scheduled for the month of August, 8/10/05 and 8/24/05. He did not believe that there was a need for both meetings and he recommended that the Board cancel the 8/24/05 Regular LMCD Board Meeting. The Board discussed the recommendation of Nybeck and the consensus was to cancel the 8/24/05 Regular LMCD Board Meeting. READING OF MINUTES- 6/8/05 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 6/22/05 LMCD Regular Board Meeting 6/22/05 LMCD Board Planning/Workshop Session Report 7/13/05 LMCD Regular Board Meeting MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Scanlon seconded to approve the minutes from the 6/8/05 LMCD Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (9), Abstained (2, Suerth and Van Hercke); motion carried. MOTION: Van Hercke moved, Knudsen seconded to approve the minutes from the 6/22/05 LMCD Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (10), Abstained (1, Seuntjens); motion carried. MOTION: Maloney moved, Gross seconded to accept the meeting report from the 6/22/05 LMCD Board Planning/Workshop Session Report as submitted. -2582- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 27, 2005 Page 2 VOTE: Ayes (9), Abstained (2, Seuntjens and Suerth); motion carried. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Scanlon seconded to approve the minutes from the 7/13/05 LMCD Regular Board Meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes (8), Abstained (3; Gross, McDermott, and Van Hercke); motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS - Persons in attendance, subjects not on agenda (5 min.) There were no comments from the public on subjects not on the agenda. CONSENT AGENDA- Consent agenda items identified with a (*) will be approved in one motion unless a Board member requests discussion of any item, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda. Seuntjens moved, Gross seconded to approve the consent agenda as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Items so approved include: 2B, Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Significant Activity Report; 3A, Audit of Vouchers (7/1/05 - 7/15/05) & (7/16/05- 7/31/05); 3B, June financial summary and balance sheet; and 4A, Minutes from the 7/8/05 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting. · Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol, mid-season update from Lt. Jeff Storms on 2005 Lake Minnetonka related activities. Skramstad welcomed Lt. Storms on behalf of the Board and asked him to provide an overview. Lt. Jeff Storms introduced himself as unit commander of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol. He reported the following: · The Water Patrol currently has 10 full-time staff members. Of the 10 staff members, three extra deputies are utilized in the summer months, primarily for Lake Minnetonka. Hennepin County funds two of these deputies and the third deputy is funded through a grant from the MN DNR. These three deputies are working 10 hour shifts on Thursdays through Sundays. · Criminal activity on Lake Minnetonka has decreased. The Water Patrol has been utilizing undercover watercraft and has increased operations on the lake, primarily along the shoreline. This is a direct result of the deputies, in conjunction with the detective, becoming more experienced at their positions. · Although the statistics has remained consistent with past boating seasons, those that have occurred have been higher profile accidents and have received greater media attention. The Water Patrol is maintaining its presence on the lake and investigations are ongoing for the July 9th accident and the recent drowning on the Lower Lake. · From May 21st through July 17th, there have been 19 BWI's on Lake Minnetonka, which is down from previous boating seasons. He attributed this to the weather in June and the increase in search efforts during this boating season. On August 1st, the legal alcohol limit for BWl's will decrease from .10 to .08. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. -2583- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 27, 2005 Page3 Knudsen asked if there was a common violation associated with BWls. Storms stated that all stops on Lake Minnetonka require a probable cause. Common violations include improper lights, equipment violations, wakes, and other inappropriate behavior. He stated that a recent legal challenge relating to safety equipment inspections has made it difficult for the Water Patrol to do its job appropriately. He requested that the Board consider adopting an ordinance that would allow the Water Patrol to issue a citation or utilize an enfomement measure for boaters that are unable to produce the proper safety equipment, including personal flotation devices. Van Hercke asked how the activity on the lake was on July 4th. Storms stated that boating traffic on July 4th was down from previous boating seasons. He attributed this to the fact that July 5th was a working day. Skramstad questioned Lt. Storms how many watercraft does the Water Patrol maintain. Storms stated the Water Patrol maintains four watercraft on Lake Minnetonka, with access to others if necessary. Scanlon stated that he had received some comments from some constituents wanting to increase the speed limit during the winter months through channels because of thin ice concerns. He asked Lt. Storms if he had comments relating to this. Storms recommended maintaining current speed limits in channel areas during winter months because of safety concerns. Skramstad stated that the LMCD was considering changes to LMCD Code relating to deicing installations. He recommended that Lt, Storms be allowed to review and comment on the draft ordinance amendment prior to any Board action. Suerth asked Lt. Storms what he thought was the single most problem on Lake Minnetonka. Storms stated that he believed the single most problem on Lake Minnetonka was speed, especially during the transition from daylight to nighttime. He believed that it was fortunate that there was a speed limit on Lake Minnetonka. The Board discussed the proposed ordinance amendment relating to the safety checks as requested by Lt. Storms. The consensus was to schedule this as an agenda item at the 8/10/05 Board Meeting. Skramstad thanked Lt. Storms on behalf of the Board for his presentation. WATER STRUCTURES A. Tim Burke, consideration of draft Findings of Fact and Order for denial of a dock length variance application at 19820 Cottagewood Road. -2584- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 27, 2005 .............. Page 4 Skramstad asked the applicant if he would like to make any comments prior to the Board considering the draft Findings of Fact and Order. Mr. Tim Burke, 19820 Cottagewood Road, stated that he had submitted a consent form for an indefinite extension to 60 day rule to allow to explore other possible opportunities with the neighborhood. He requested that the Board table his pending variance application to a future Board meeting. MOTION: Seuntjens moved, Gross seconded to table the draft Findings of Fact and Order to deny the Tim Burke dock length variance application to a future Board meeting. VOTE: Motion carried unanimously. B, Additional Business There was no additional business. LAKE USE AND RECREATION A. Chair update on Lake Minnetonka Boat Density Committee. Skramstad asked Van Hemke to provide an overview on this agenda item. Van Hercke stated that an action plan has been created based on the approved Boat Density Committee Goals and Recommendations. The action plan outlines the task; estimated date of completion; LMCD Team Member(s), including a Team Leader; and the opportunity for non LMCD Team Member(s) to participate. She requested that each LMCD Board member volunteer their time and efforts for at least one of these Tasks. Upon completion of Board discussion, the following members volunteered or were assigned to the following five Tasks: Task A: Develop/refine communication strategy, plan, and timeline. Oversee team members performing the following tasks. (Team Leader- Tom Scanlon) · Develop/improve new materials that clarify LMCD rules. (Pete Nelson) · Review/update signage at public accesses & marinas. (Andrew McDermott) · Review/update LMCD publications and web site, MN DNR Boating Guide, and regular mailings. (Open) · Develop advertising campaigns utilizing key messages by partnering with the State of MN, the MN DNR, and the Water Patrol. (Herb Suerth) -2585- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting · Continue to form strong partnerships with local realtors, local dock installers, marinas, lake organizations, etc. (Tom Skramstad) · Expand safe boater classes for adults. (David Gross) John Berns stated that he would assist this Team where necessary for Task A. Task B Proactively advocate for a Boat Operator's License. This will most likely require the forming of a coalition that will determine the strategy including key tasks, timelines, and contacts needed to work with the state legislature. (David Gross, Steve Johnson- Co Team Leader, and Paul Knudsen- Co Team Leader) Task C Water Patrol liaison. Keep in contact to continue to support the Water Patrol, particularly in their efforts to identify, track, and notify discourteous boaters about their lake use behaviors. (Tom Seuntjens) Task D Enforcement. · Develop and implement a process for enforcing storage ordinances. (Cree 7ischke) · Work with 14 LMCD member cities to actively involve them in common enforcement related issues. (Mike Maloney) Task E Work with the LMCD Executive Director on a redraft of the 1974 Boat Density Policy Statement and the Lake Use and Recreation Chapter of the 1991 Management Plan for Lake Minnetonka. (Doug Babcock and David Gross) Van Hercke requested an update on the plan and timelines from each of the Teams at the 8/10/05 LMCD Regular Board Meeting. Update on 8/13/05 "Future of the Lake Day" Special Event. Skramstad asked for an update on this from Berns. Berns stated that plans for the "Future of the Lake Day" special event were on-going. At the minimum, he requested that Board members serve as a liaison to the city hall that they represent. In addition to this task, there are a number of other tasks that he believed needed to be addressed by Board members. These tasks, with Board members volunteering to assist, include: · Liaison to the Minnetonka Power Squadron- Steve Johnson. · Liaison to yacht clubs/sailing schools- David Gross and Mike Maloney. · Liaison to local access cable channel- Tom Scanlon. -2586- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting J.u_ly2_.7_.~_2~O_5 ................................................................... _P_a_ge 6 Arrange to have milfoil harvesters present- Greg Nybeck. · Liaison to Sheriff's Water Patrol- Greg Nybeck. Contact local businesses about donating to the event- Mike Maloney. · Locating a bull-horn- David Gross. Nybeck encouraged Board members that were in town on 8/13/05 to stop by the event and to assist in crowd control and any other activities. D. Additional Business There was no additional business. FINANCIAL C. Mid-year update on LMCD finances from Treasurer Paul Knudsen. Skramstad asked Knudsen for an update on this agenda item. Knudsen made the following comments: · For the Administration Budget, revenues received through June are $204,502, compared to planned revenues of $214,070. This is a deficit of $9,568 and he provided an overview of how levy payments from the 14 member cities, license revenue, court fines, and a planned reserve fund allocation contributed to this. · For the Administration Budget, expenditures incurred through June are $184,558, compared to planned expenditures of $166,242. This is an overage of $18,316 and he provided an overview of how unanticipated legal fees, unanticipated professional services, and carry over expenses from the 2004 Lake Minnetonka Boat Use Study contributed to this. · For the Exotics Budget, revenues received though June are $46,336, compared to planned revenues of $47,000. He stated that revenues received through June are right on schedule. · For the Exotics Budget, expenses incurred through June are $23,655, compared to planned expenditures of $40,240. This is a deficit of $16,575 and he believed it was too early to provide a meaningful analysis of expenses incurred to date with the 2005 EWM Harvesting and Zebra Mussel Programs. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. Skramstad thanked Knudsen for the mid-year update on LMCD finances. D. Additional Business There was no additional business. -2587- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July27, 2005 Page 7 EWM/EXOTICS TASK FORCE B. Report from the 7/8/05 EWM/Exotics Task Force Meeting, Suerth stated that the primary discussion at this meeting focused on milfoil and whether its growth is getting worse on Lake Minnetonka, Other discussion included possible MN DNR funding relating to chemical treatments and an update on zebra mussel inspections being conducted by the MN DNR. Overall, he stated that he was quite pleased with these inspections. C. 2005 EWM Harvesting Program Mid-Season Report. Skramstad asked Nybeck for an updated on this agenda item. Nybeck provided an update through July 15th and made the following comments: · Three harvesters were launched at the Spring Park public access on June 8th. These three harvesters were to be supplemented with the used high speed transport barge; however, it was not launched until July 12th and available to the crew until July 14th. Harvesting began on June lOth in Carmans/OId Channel Bays and there have been 23 working days to date. · Acres harvested are being tabulated through a handheld GPS and will be documented in the 2005 EWM Final Harvesting Report. · Harvester loads to date are 175.50 or an average of 7.63 per day. This compares to 159.50 harvester loads or a daily average of 6.93 for the first 23 working days in 2004. · Truck loads to date are 89.00 or an average of 3.87 per day. This compares to 76.00 truck loads or a daily average of 3.30 for the first 23 working days in 2004. · The South Upper Lake Option was implemented by the LMCD in 2005. The Upper Lake has been harvested once and he estimated that harvesting on the Lower Lake would be completed by July 29th. This would allow the remaining two weeks for second harvests, where necessary. · He entertained questions or comments from the Board. D. Additional Business Van Hercke stated that she had received a letter from Congressman Jim Ramstad offering to facilitate a meeting with the MN DNR Commissioner Gene Merriam to discuss milfoil problems. She indicated that she had run the idea of this meeting with Suerth and Nybeck to get their comments on this. Suerth questioned whether a meeting was appropriate at this time because he believed that the MN DNR has been very cooperative in recent years. Additionally, he believed that there needed to be homework done prior to discussing the milfoil situation on Lake Minnetonka with the MN DNR Commissioner. Seuntjens stated that it might make sense to better communicate with the public that the primary focus of the LMCD's harvesting program is to address impediment to public boat navigation rather -2588- Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Regular Board Meeting July 27, 2005 Page 8 than addressing aesthettics, the focus of the Nybeck stated that if a meeting is coordinated, he recommended that Chip Welling and Jay Rendall be invited since they are the experts on milfoil and deal with it on a daily basis, 5. ADMINISTRATION There was no discussion. 6. SAVE THE LAKE There was no discussion 7. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT Nybeck stated that a copy of the most recent Executive Director Newsletter was included in the handout folders for informational purposes. Additionally, the lake level was 929.16' on 7/26/95, with the dam discharging at 75 cfs. 8, OLD BUSINESS There was no discussion. 9, NEW BUSINESS Nybeck stated that MCWD will be holding a Planning/Workshop Session on Thursday, 8/18/05, at 7:30 p.m. to discuss exotic species, including milfoil harvesting and zebra mussels. He indicated that he would forward additional information when it becomes available. 10, ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Tom Skramstad, Chair Katy Van Hercke, Vice Chair -2589- Aul-lg-05 10:88 From-Kennedy & Graven C H A E T E R E D 470 U,S, Bank Phm~ 200 South Sixth (612) 337-9300 r,'l,"phon~' (612) 337-9310 http;/Iwww, k~nnedy-graven.com +$1233Tg310 T-g82 P.O 02/008 F-284 Au~tst 19, 2005 Carlton Moore Director of Public Works 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364-1627 Attorney ut Law .Direm Dial (612) 337.9219 MSI~ Ccr~'i~ct Kw. al ?ropcrry Law Spcci~li$'t BY EM. AIL: carltonmoor¢c~cit¥oF~m°und'c°m Request by Metropolitan Cmmcil Euvkomnental Services For Sarfimry Sewer Easements From City Dear Carlton: You sent me legal descriptions and parcel sketches for two sanitary sewer and utility easements which Metropolitan Council Environmental Services ("MCES") has requested that the City provide to MCES. The easements would both permanently encumber City property, as follows: I. Part of Lots 53, 54 and 55, Lynwold Park, part of Lot 1, Kennedy's SubdiVision of Lot 56, Lynwold Park, and part of' Government Lot 8 of Section 14, Township 117, Range 24, Lmmediately west of Commerce Blvd. (containing 12,666 square feet). Substantial portions of this proposed easement tract appear to be already btu:cloned by easements in favor of MCES (the north 25 feet pursuant to Doc, No. 6413685) and in favor of Northern States Power (per Doc. No. 2181922 over Lot 53, Lynwold Park). 2. Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 117, Range 24, underlying the North 36 feet of to be vacated Shoreli~e Drive (Old County Road 15) lying within approximately 100 feet irmnediately west of the right-of-way line of New County Road 15. This area also lies witlfin an existing sanitary sewer easement. We recommend that the City Council adopt the enclosed resolution authorizing tl~e Mayor and City Manager to execute the requested permanent easements in favor of the Metropolitan Council Envixm~mental Services in form approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Please call me if you have any questions. POL:gak cc: gob Dehler John Dean 10:36 From-Kenned~ & GravBn T-g32 P-003/008 ;-Z34 KI~SOLUTION NO. os- AUTHO~G EXECUTION OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the official g{veming body of the City of Mound; and WFIEKEAS, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, acting by and through its City Council, is authorized by law to grant permanent eaSements for sanitary sewer purposes; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services ("MCES") has requested that the City grant to MCES permanent eaSements burdening two parcels of City ow~aed land as follows: Parcel One_: Part of Lots 53, 54, and 55, Lynwold Park; part of Lot 1, Kennedy's ~ubdivision of Lot 56 Lynwold Park, aud part of Oove~meGt Lot g of Section 14, Township 117, Range 24 which is described On Exhibit A attached hereto and which is depicted in Exhibit A-I attached hereto. Parcel Two: Part of the Southwest Queer of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, T-~wr~ship 117, l~uge 24 which is described on Exhibit B attached hereto aud which is depleted on Exhibit B-1 attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that it is the considered judgement of the Council that the Easements be gnmted for~e stated public purposes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Maz~ager are authorized and directed to execute and deliver such Easement~ to Metropolitan Council in form md subs'tanee acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember The following voted in the a~rmalive: The following voted against: Councilmember Adopted by the City Council this _ Counciknember was absent. day of August 2005. and seconded by RJ1.-267167v I 1 MU2.20-4 ~u~-~9-05 10:35 From-Kanned¥ & Gravan +61233T6310 T-032 ~ .004/008 F-Z34 Pat Meisel, Mayor ATTEST: Bonnie Killer, City Clerk P, JL-2671§Tvl 2 MU22~ 10:$? From-Kennedy & Graven +6123370310 T-g32 P. 005/008 F-Z34 EXHIBIT A ILIL-26Z275vl MIJ200.12~ ^ui-lg-O6 10:37 From-Kennedy & Graven +6123379310 T-g32 P-006/008 F-234 EXIHBIT ,A-1 , . I ,-',i ''''J ,, i ~L-267167vl NIIY).2O-4 2 Aul-19-O$ 10:37 From-Kennedy & Graven +61Z3379310 T-93~ P.007/008 F-Z$4 RJL-267167vl