The URL can be used to link to this page

2005-09-13PLEASE TIIRN_OEEAT_CELL PHONES_&~AGERS 1NLCOiJI~IL_CHAMBERS~ ____ AGENDA *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Page Call meeting to order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda *A. Approve minutes: August 23, 2005 regular meeting August 30, 2005 special meeting September 7, 2005 special meeting 2590-2595 2596 2597 *B. Approve payment of claims 2598-2628 *C. Reschedule meetings: November 8, 2005 meeting to 8:00 p.m. December 13, 2005 meeting to 8:00 p.m. *D. Adopt an ordinance amending the City Code Chapter 155 as it relates to the City Council 2629-2630 *E. Adopt resolution adopting amendments to Fee Schedule 2631 *F. Adopt resolution authorizing reconveyance of Tax Forfeited Property: PID 19-117-23-32-0128 2632 *G. Approve Public Lands Permits: 1. Mike/Sara McCue 4687 Island View Drive Irrigation & stairs on Devon Commons 2633-2643 Kirk Bernhagen 4539 Island View Drive Rip-rap on Devon Commons 2644-2652 Steve Bedell 4957 Island View Drive Rip-rap on Devon Commons 2653-2659 ~-PLEASE- ~TURN~OFF-~CELLP~IONE S~PAGERS~IN-COUNCILC~~ ~ o o o *H. Approve Pay Request by Buffalo Bituminous for partial payment for 2005 Street Project, in the amount of $276,125.43 *I. Adopt a resolution identifying the need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Funding and authorizing an application for grant funds for Transit District parking deck *J. Adopt a resolution approving variances for fence height and swimming pool fencing waiver for new house located at 1605 Bluebird Lane *K. Adopt a resolution approving a Public Land Permit Application for temporary driveway in public right-of-way adjacent to 4712 Richmond Road, as recommended by Public Works Director *L. Approve resolution to require local approval of land divisions for all property within the boundaries of Mound Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to three minutes per speaker.) Public Hearings: A. Planning Commission Recommendation(s) 1. Planning Case No. 05-06 Vacation - unimproved Halstead Avenue 6619 Bartlett Boulevard Larry Peterson Planning Case No. 05-27 Vacation - unimproved portion of Stafford Road 4458 Denbigh Road Bruce Johnson Request by Westonka Historical Society and Lake Minnetonka Chamber of Commerce for waiver of fee(s) for permanent sign at 2323 and 2325 Commerce Boulevard Vem Brandenberg of WeCAN, with amended plan for Public Gathering Permit for Tree Lighting Ceremony and Sleepout Benefit 2006 Budget: A. Action on resolution approving the 2006 Preliminary General Fund Budget in the amount of $4,792,440; setting the preliminary levy at $4,256,204; and approving the preliminary overall budget for 2006 Bo Action on resolution approving a levy not to exceed $153,720 for the purpose of defraying the cost of operation, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound for the Year 2006 2660-2663 2664-2666 2667-2669 2670-2679 2680-2685 2686-2715 2716-2731 2732-2735 2736-2737 2738-2748 2749 PLEASE _q'~__IR_NLOI~F~a_T C_ELL~PHONES&~.PAGERS~I~/..121tUNCI-L~U~ILaAVIIlF~RS. 10. Action on amendments to the Administrative Code 2750-2775 11. Action on appeals for dock revocations 2776-2793 Discussion and request for directive regarding Mound shoreland overlay regulations and 1994 approval of City's flexibility request 2794-2812 13. Presentation of Andrews Sisters Walk-of-Fame concept 14. Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Questions and comments from Councilmembers B. Correspondence: Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative C. Reports: Liquor Store - August 2005 Finance Department - August 2005 2813-2815 2816 2817-2819 15. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: www. cit¥ofmound, com. SECTION 27 - RESIGNATION 27.1 Any employee wishing to leave the service of the City in good standing will file a letter of resignation with his/her immediate supervisor at least two (2) weeks prior to the effective date. 27.2 Any Department Head/Superintendent wishing to leave the service of the City in good standing shall file a letter of resignation with the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date. Council Commi~ee response: Council Committee proposes to add to the above sections: 27.3 Vacation or comp-time may only be uSed during the two weeks notice period with the prior authorization of the City Manager (non-exempt employees). 27~ Vacation time may only be used during the 30 days notice period with the prior authorization of the City, Manager (exempt employees). 25 COUNCIL BRIEFING September 13, 2005 Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! Sept 13 - 7:20 - HRA regular meeting Sept 13 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Sept 16 - 6:30-1-2:00 - Taste of the Lakes - Baywiew Event Center Sept 27 - 6:30 - HRA regular meeting Sept 27 - 7:30 - CC regular meeting Sept 29 - 4:30 - Mound Crime Prevention Annual Meeting (optional) Oct 8 - 8:00-3:00 - Fall Recycling Day Oct 8 - Mound American Legion Octoberfest Oct 17 - Lost Lake District Groundbreaking Nov 1 - 2:00-4:00 - Vaccination Clinic - City Hall Nov 8 - 8:00 - CC regular meeting (note time) Nov 17 - 6:00 - Tree Lighting Ceremony/WeCAN Sleepout Benefit - Lost Lake Greenway Dec 5 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing Dec 12 - 7:00 - Truth in Taxation Hearing continuation, if needed Dec 13 - School District Referendum Dec 13 - 8:00 - CC regular meeting (note time) Upcoming Absences Sept 24 - 28 Kandis Hanson Conference and Public 11 Nov 24-25 Dec 23 (noon) Dec 26 Dec 30 (noon) Jan 2 Safety Admin Offices Closed Veteran's Day Thanksgiving Christmas Eve Christmas Day New Year's Eve New Year's Day Need InfOrmation? Council Members are encouraged to contact the manager prior to a Council meeting when you have a question pertaining to the agenda that warrants research. That will enable the appropriate staff person the time needed to gather the information and more adequately answer your questions in the public setting. Makes us all look good! Council & Manager Communications. In a world where one answers to one employer, the relationship is fairly simple and pleasing that person is a matter of one-to-one communication, made up of what happens to be the concern at the moment. Working for five employers is much more complex. It means five times the communication and satisfying the concerns of five very individual persons. At Mound, and under the current mayor, the mayor has taken on the responsibility of verbally communicating a single issue to the members. That ensures a uniform discussion and is a time saving measure for the manager. It alleviates the need for the Manager to contact every member numerous times per week on a variety of topics, up time for other equally important responsibilities. The mayor acting as the communications conduit has worked here. That style or method, however, does not preclude phone calls or visits or emails from the individual members to the manager with your comments or concerns. That communication is essential to building and maintaining the work relationships and is encouraged. Occasional lunches together are a good thing too, combining social with business. (anttached is a page from a text book I own. It describes the way in which managers are trained to serve five d in some cases, more) employers. Always be assured that good communication is my goal. Sometimes I will fail at that, but never with malice or the intent of withholding information. A means of avoiding that situation is the provision of uniform information to all the members, usually in written form, so the message gets received uniformly, as well. You may depend upon my intention of good communication, resulting in better government for those we serve. I checked just one paragraph on the attachment, but take time to take in the whole page. It' s good information. Meeting Times The first meeting in Nov and Dec are being moved to 8:00 p.m., because there are elections being held on those days and our meetings may not coincide with an election. Polling places close by 8:00 p.m. HRA meetings for those dates have been cancelled. At the request of the Mayor, there is a Consent Agenda ordinance amendment that proposes starting City Council meetings at 7:00 p.m. Planning Commission moved to 7:00 p.m. some time back. If this is approved, you will be asked to consider a HRA meeting start time of 6:00 p.m., which must be addressed through a bylaws amendment. Human Resources After numerous interviews, a candidate was selected for Administrative Assistant who subsequently turned down our offer of employment when her employer offered a pay raise. The others that were interviewed were not considered to be the right fit for the position. With 50 applications to consider, we went back to the pool are interviewing additional candidates. The position will be filled in early October. See you at the carnival! 53 I Communicating With Elected Of~cials One of the most difficult tasks the manager faces is to present the concerns of the whole community to the council in a competitive environment. The local government manager contributes to that flow of information in several ways: the staff's day-to-day contacts with citizens, employee relations, agenda communications, formal presentations at public meet- ings and at council briefings, and responses to individual requests from council members. Newly elected officials are often surprised by the demands Of the office and by the conflicting information they receive. Before taking of- rice, the candidate may have been impressed by one particular special- interest group. After being elected, the official hears not only from that special-interest group but also from other interest groups, the staff, and the news media. One of the most difficult tasks the local government manager faces is to present the concerns of the whole community to the city or county council in such a competitive environment. To make a positive contribution, you need to know what is being communicated to your elected officials. Make it a point to read all agenda communications, and to identify issues that will be of greatest concern to the council. Pay attention to the letters that you and your staff re- ceive from citizens. Some of the complaints you receive are likely to be made to your elected officials as well. If you see some pattern to the complaints,' take the initiative to alert the council to the problem and a possible solution. Remember, many citizen~ see their elected officials as the court of last resort. They may have already approached the staff with the prob- lem and not been satisfied. By the time they take it to the elected offi- cial, their feelings have grown more intense. What may have seemed like a routine problem to you may become magnified when presented to an elected official. In this kind of environment, an elected official needs strong sup- port from his or her staff. Prompt attention to requests from council members can help relieve the pressure on them. Likewise, your employ- ees should defuse the ire of as many disgruntled citizens as possible. Every citizen who can be helped at the staff level is one citizen fewer who feels he or she must escalate a demand to the attention of your elected officials. MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 23, 2005 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, August 23, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mike Specht and John Beise. Members Absent: Councilmember David Osmek. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Brad Goranson, Ellen Cowell, Terry Starkey, Sharon Cook, Liz Jensen, Cathy Bailey, Jen and Brad Searl, Diane Rosencranz, Tom Niccum, Rhonda and Greg Eurich, Daniel hart, Brian Bergquist, Scott Eccles, Tim and Shelly Belivieu, Ted Metz. Consent Agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council and will be enacted by a roll call vote. Thee will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open Meeting Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 2. Pledge of AIleqiance 3. Approve Agenda Meisel requested the removal of 4G from the consent agenda as requested by the applicant. She also requested moving Item 9 to 6A. MOTION by Specht, seconded by Beisel to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent Agenda MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to approve Items 4A-4F of the consent agenda. Upon roll Call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve minutes of August 9, 2005. B. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $553,948.38. C. Set special City Council meeting to discuss the Docks Program, for September 7, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. D. RESOLUTION NO. 05-117: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS. 1 -2590- Mound City Council Minutes - August 23, 2005 E. Approve Payment Request #1 from Veit & Company in the amount of $1,166,724.45 for the Lost Lake Dump Response Actions. F. ORDINANCE NO, 14-2005: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 330 OF THE CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO PLATTING AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. G. (removed) 4G. Planning Commission Recommendation Case #05-39 - Variance(s) for construction of new single-family dwelling at 4798 Northern Road. Sarah Smith reviewed the variance(s) application submitted by Brad and Jennifer Totoritis-Searl to construct a new 2-story single family dwelling at 4798 Northern Road. Brown commented that he has a problem with granting approval to construct a home on a 3,000 sq. ft. lot. Smith stated that the lot size is already a non- conforming condition and sees the floodplain and lakeshore improvement as very favorable improvements. This is an existing lot of record and was platted at its present size. Gene Hostetler, architect for the applicant stated that they would like to go back to the 22' width for the house instead of the revised 21'. This requires a 1' side setback on the east side also. MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to adopt the following resolution, to include a 5' side setback on the east as discussed above. The following voted in favor: Specht, Beise and Meisel. The following voted against: Brown. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 05-118: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE VARIANCES TO ALLOW CONSTURCTION OF A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY HOME TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT 4798 NORTHERN ROAD. P&Z CAE #05-39, PID #18-117-23- 33-0026. 5. Comments and suqgestions from citizens present on any item not on the a_clenda. None were offered. 6. Request for Public Gatherinq Permit for 2005 Tree Lighting Ceremony and Sleep-Out Benefit Liz Jensen and Vern Brandenburg presented a request from WeCAN and the Chamber of Commerce for a Public Gathering Permit for November 17 and November 18, 2005. This permit would cover the Tree Lighting Ceremony and the "Give a Hoot About the Homeless" sleep-out benefit. Discussion followed regarding the request to waive the $300 fee for the permit. 2 -2591 - Mound City Council Minutes - August 23, 2005 MOTION by Brown, seconded by Beise to waive the fee for this event. The following voted in favor: Brown and Beise. The following voted against: Specht and Mei~el. Motion does not pass. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Beise to table this item until the fee portion can be worked out. The following voted in favor: Brown and Beise. The following voted against: Specht and Meisel. Motion does not pass. MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to approve this public gathering permit and reduce the fee from $300 to $200. It is assumed that each organization can contribute $100. The following voted in favor: Specht, Beise and Meisel. The following voted against: Brown. Motion carried. 6A. Review of preliminary plans for parking lot expansion project- Gillespie Center Sarah Smith reviewed that representatives of the Gillespie Center have submitted a request regarding a proposed expansion to their parking lot. Their proposal is tq grade the lot and cover it with rock and leave it for a year. The idea is to let the base settle and then pave it in 2006 hoping they have more money by then. They also want to drop the concrete curb and gutter Until the larger parking lot can be included with this one. They are asking the Council to consider waiving the requirement for paving and curb and gutter and allow for a phased implementation. Meisel asked if they had permission from the County for an exit onto Bartlett Boulevard and Sharon Cook indicated that they have met with Hennepin County and an exit on Bartlet is approved. Cook also indicated that they have the first options on the lot on the corner of Bartlett and Shoreline and both that lot and the one included in this request have no uses but for parking lots. The City is in need of more parking for Mound Bay Park, and could use these lots when not being used by Gillespie Center. Meisel stated that action is not requested on this item at this time. Smith indicated that there will need to be follow up action by the Council regarding the rezoning of a portion of the proposed site, also. 7. Public Hearinc~ A. Planning Commission Recommendations 1. Case #05-52: Conditional Use PermitNariance(s) for Indian Knoll Parking Lot Expansion at 2020 Commerce Boulevard. Sarah reviewed that Public Works Director Carlton Moore, on behalf of the Mound HRA, is requesting a conditional use permit to expand the parking lot associated with Indian Knoll Apartment Complex at 2020 Commerce Blvd. A variance approval is also requested to allow hardcover exceeding 40 percent, to address the deficient parking lot count and to'allow a proposed 24 foot parking lot drive aisle. 3 -2592- Mound City Council Minutes - August 23, 2005 Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:27 p.m. Ellen Cowell, 5508 Breezy Road, expressed concerns about their property value going down with a commercial parking next to them, and also about cutting of trees and car lights shining into their home. Rhonda and Greg Eurich, 5585 Sherwood Drive, also expressed concern about the removal of huge beautiful trees, lights shining and drainage. Meisel informed them that the drainage is left to the engineers and will be addressed during construction. Greg Eurich questioned the need for this many parking spaces. Meisel stated that the need has been there for a number of years. There are 51 units at Indian Knoll and only 16 parking spaces in the lot. This project will bring the number to 41, which is still way below what should be there. Cindy Reiter, representing the management company for Indian Knoll, stated that limited parking has been a huge issue for them. Brown asked how many registered vehicles are there and Cindy will get this figure for him. Brad Goranson, 5522 Spruce Road, also expressed concern over wiping out most of the woods and questioned if that many more spaces are actually needed. He stated he is also concerned with the drainage. Cindy Reiter explained that capital funds are set aside for this project. It will be a federally funded project and no funds are coming from taxpayers. Mayor Meisel closed the public hearing at 8:46 p.m. MOTION by Brown to table this item until the number of cars actually registered to tenants at Indian Knoll is known. Motion died for lack of a second. MOTION by Beise, seconded by Specht to adopt the following resolution. The following voted in favor: Beise, Specht, and Meisel. The following voted against: Brown. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 05-119: RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW PARKING LOT EXPANSION AT INDIAN KNOLL APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED AT 2020 COMMERCE BOULEVARD. P&Z Case #05-52, PID #13-117-24-32-0030. 2. Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 350 - Zoninq Ordinance Sarah Smith reviewed that she is proposing amendments to the Zoning Ordinance regarding the definition of "frontage", the required front setback for unimproved streets exceeding 15 feet in width and allowable fence materials. 4 -2593- Mound City Council Minutes - August 23, 2005 Mayor Meisel opened the public hearing at 8:58 p.m., and upon hearing no comment, closed the public hearing at 8:59 p.m. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Specht to pass the following ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 15-2005: ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 350 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE. 8. Planning Commission Recommendations A. Case #05-53: Variances for waiver of swimming pool enclosure requirements and 8 foot fence height- 1605 Bluebird Lane Sarah Smith reviewed a variance request submitted by Aqua Pool an Spa on behalf of Tim Belivieu to allow construction of an 8' cedar fence (6 foot with 2 foot decorative lattice) to be installed along the north property line at 1605 Bluebird Lane, and also a variance to waive the swimming pool fencing requirements as a specially designed pool cover has been installed on the new pool. Ted Metz, 1601 Bluebird Lane, expressed that he supports the fence variance request. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Beise to approve the variance for the 8' fence, and to approve waiving the swimming pool fencing requirement due to the presence of a mechanical swimming pool cover. A resolution reflecting these approvals will be on the next Council consent agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. B. Case #05-57: Floodplain/wetland permit applications - 5351 Three Points Boulevard Sarah Smith indicated that this is the third of three applications needed for single home construction in the minor subdivision approved for William Stoddard in 2003. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Beise to adopt the following resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 05-120: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION PERMIT (MCWD RULE C) AND CERTIFICATE OF WETLAND EXEMPTION FROM THOMAS AND HEIDI NICCUM FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5351 THREE POINTS BOULEVARD. PID #13-117-24-22-0285. 9. (moved to 6A) 5 -2594- Mound City Council Minutes -August 23, 2005 10. Permit application by Mound Legion for Octoberfest A. Public Dance/Live Music Permit request B. Temporary on-sale 3.2 Beer OR temporary on-sale liquor license Scoff Eccles, on behalf of the American Legion, stated that they have decided to apply for the temporary 3.2 beer license, not the temporary on-sale liquor. John Dean stressed that members and guests of the Legion cannot bring liquor from inside the premises out to where they are serving 3.2 beer in their beer garden. Also, the area must be fenced off and regulated. Proof of insurance for this event, covering the temporary license, must also be provided before the license can be issued. MOTION by Brown, seconded by Specht to approve the public dance/live music permit and the temporary 3.2 beer license for the American Legion for October 8, 2005, stating that no liquor from inside the Legion premises will be allowed outside where the temporary 3.2 license is active. Proof of insurance covering the event outside is also required. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 11. Miscellaneous/Correspondence A. Questions and comments from Councilmembers - Brown asked that the next council agenda include naming part of the Greenway the Andrew Sisters Walk of Fame. Meisel stated that she thinks more time needs to be put into this and it may not be ready for the next agenda. B. Report: Finance Deparatment-July, 2005 C. Minutes: LMCD 12. Adjourn MOTION by Specht, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 9:25 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel 6 -2595- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 30, 2005 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel; Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mike Specht, John Beise and David Osmek. Others Present: City Manager Kandis Hanson, City Clerk Bonnie Ritter, Parks Superintendent Jim Fackler, Liquor Store Manager John Colotti, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Finance Director Gino Businaro, Fire Chief Greg Pederson, Police Chief Jim Kurtz, Public Works Superintendent Greg Skinner, Public Works Director Carlton Moore. 1. Open Meetinq Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 2. Discussion of General Fund Revenues Businaro presented a brief overview of the general fund revenues. 3. Discussion of Summary of Revenues and Expenditures Discussion took place with department heads answering questions regarding cpital purchases and personnel needs. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Specht to extend the meeting 30 minutes, to 9:30 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Preliminary discussion on Levy and Fund Balance Acceptable amounts were-discussed for the levy and fund balance. It was the consensus of the council to adjust the general property tax to 16.5%, which would put the fund balance at 20.16%. These figures will be plugged into the resolution for adoption of the preliminary levy and budget for consideration at the next council meeting. MOTION by Specht, seconded by.Osmek to extend the meeting another 15 minutes. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. Individual budgets, including Capital Purchases/Programs Department Heads answered questions the Council had pertaining to specific line items in their budgets. 6. Adjourn MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Brown to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2596- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in special session on Wednesday, September 7, 2005, at 6:30 p.m. in the council chambers of city hall. Members Present: Mayor Pat Meisel: Councilmembers Bob Brown, Mike Specht, John Beise and David Osmek. Others Present: City Attorney John Dean, City Manager Kandis Hanson, Docks Superintendent Jim Fackler, Katie Hoff. 1. Open Meeting Mayor Meisel called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 2. Discussion of Dock Program Fees Fackler reviewed the proposed fee increases needed to maintain a $100,000 dock fund balance. He also presented the balance sheet approved by the Docks and Commons Commission at their September 2, 2005 meeting. After lengthy discussion it was the consensus of the Council to propose (beginning 2006) increasing the regular dock fee from $275 to $300, regular slips from $300 to $350, personal watercraft from $113 to $150, and create a share fee and additional BSU fee of $150. It was also proposed to create a third tier of fees for the Lost Lake multiple docks. This fee is proposed at 150% of the regular slip fee with a cap for three years (2006 through 2008) of $650. Based on a $350 regular slip fee that would put the Lost Lake multiple dock fee at $525. Fackler was directed to plug the above numbers into the spread sheet and present it to the Council for review. Discussion took place as to the timeline for setting the Lost Lake dock fees because MHRD anticipates doing pre-sales of units in November, 2005. They are requesting that the fees be set before pre-sales so they can be conveyed to prospective buyers. 3. Adjourn MOTION by Brown, seconded by Beise to adjourn at 9:16 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2597- SEPTEMBER 13, 2005 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 081905SU E $265.00 AUG 082305CRCARD$1,400.20 AUG 082405SU E $1,179,442.11 AUG 0831'05SUE $1,676.91 AUG 090705SU E $1,104.77 SEPT 091305SUE $494,061.47 SEPT TOTAL $1,677,950.46 -2598- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 081905SUE Payments City of Mound Payments 08/19/05 10:44 AM Page 1 Current Period: August 2005 User Dollar Amt $265.00 Computer Dollar Amt $265.00 $0.00 In Balance Refer 81905 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 081705 8/17/2005 Transaction Date 8/19/2005 PERMIT 15 TO DRIFTWOOD LANE $265.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $265,00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $265.00 $265.00 Pre-Written Check $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Compute $265.00 Total $265,00 -2599- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name Refer 82205 082205CRCARD Payment Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:47 AM Page 1 Current Period: August 2005 Computer DollarAmt $1,400.20 Posted ELAN CREDIT CARD E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 101-41910-300 Professional Srvs 8/22/2005 E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-431 Meeting Expense 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8/22/2005 E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 8/22/2005 E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 8/22/2005 E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 8/22/2005 Ck# 099118 8/22/2005 07-15-05 APWA CONFERENCE,MOORE 07-20-05 INET 7 07-25-05 BATTERIES 07-17-05 CARBONES FESTIVAL EVENT RESERVES 07-15-05 SPORTMART 07-21-05 VERIZON CASE 07-15-05 OFFICE MAX PAPER 07-27-05 BEST WESTERN ROOM CHARGE 07-21-05 VERIZON CASE 07-25-05 BATTERIES 07-25-05 BATTERIES 07-21-05 VERIZON CASE E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 07-19-05 OTTEN BROS,SOD 8/22/2005 E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-205 Computer Software 8/22/2005 E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 8/22/2005 E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies 07-20-05 FRANKLIN COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON 07-25-05 BATTERIES 08-02-05 TIGER DIRECT MEMORY STICKS SQUAD COMPUTERS 07-15-05 APWA CONFERENCE,MOORE 07-15-05 APWA CONFERENCE,MOORE 07-20-05 FRANKLIN COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON 07-20-05 FRANKLIN COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-400 Repairs & Maint Contract 07-29-05 OTTEN BROS,SOD 8/22/2005 $89.99 $31.95 $14.18 $70.28 $59.99 $7.08 $38;20 $93.08 $7.O8 $14.19 $14.19 $7.08 $67.89 $26.77 $14.18 $89.95 $360.02 $89.99 $26.77 $26.77 $33.94 -2600- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Cash Payment Invoice 082205 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 09~08/05 11:47 AM Page 2 Current Period: August 2005 E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies 07-20-05 FRANKLIN $26.77 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies 8/22/2005 E 222-42260-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 8/22/2005 E 101-42110-205 Computer Software 8/22~2005 8/16/2005 Due 0 COVEY,CALENDAR,HANSON 07-20-05 BESTBUY 07-19-05 OTTEN BROS,SOD 07-13-05 TIGER DIRECT USP PARTS SQUAD COMPUTER Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68.14 $33.95 $87.77 $1,400,20 Fund Summary BATCH Total $1,400.20 10100 Wells Faro 101 $958.93 222 $33.95 601 $138.02 602 $231.10 609 $38.20 $1,400.20 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $1,400.20 $0.00 $1,400.20 -2601 - CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 082405SUE Payments Refer 82405 HENNEPIN COUNTY Cash Payment Invoice 082405 Transaction Date G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow 8/24/2005 8/24/2005 City of Mound 08/24/05 2:05 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2005 User DollarAmt $1,179,442.11 Computer Dollar Amt $1,179,442.11 $0.00 In Balance LOAN #7358456 #12-117-24-43-0041 1563 $11,419.00 BLUEBIRD LANE Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,419.00 Refer 82405 MONTEVIDEO COURTHOUSE Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow WT #04005465 CASE #05-2235 NSF CHECK $227.00 Invoice 082405 8/24/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $227.00 Refer 82405 PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC OF MINNE Cash Payment E 101-43100-434 Conference & Training 09-05 CONFERENCE, MOORE $33.34 invoice 082405 8/24/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training 09-05 CONFERENCE, MOORE $8.33 Invoice 082405 8/24/2005. Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training 09-05 CONFERENCE, MOORE $8.33 invoice 082405 8/24/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 82405 ROBERTS, COLLETTE Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2005 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $621.66 Invoice 082405 8/24/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $621.66 Refer 82405 SWANSON, AMY Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2005 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $400.00 Invoice 082405 8~24~2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $400.00 Refer 82405 VEIT AND COMPANY, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 475-46386-500 Capital Outlay FA THRU 08-15-05 DUMP REMEDIATION $1,166,724.45 Invoice 082405 8/24/2005 Transaction Date 8/18/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,166,724.45 -2602- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND City of Mound Payments 08/24/05 2:05 PM Page 2 Current Period: August 2005 10100 Wells Fargo $12,701.00 $1,166,724.45 $8.33 $8.33 $1,179,442.11 Pm-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $1,179,442.11 $1,179,442.11 -2603- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 083105SUE Payments Refer 83105 BERENT, BRIAN City of Mound 08/3~/051:23 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2005 User Dollar Amt $1,676.91 Computer Dollar Amt $1,676.91 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 $0.00 In Balance 2005 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $164.83 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $164.83 Refer 83105 BROOKLYN PARK, POLICE DEPAR Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Trainin~ 10-26-05 SEMINAR, KURTZ $110.00 Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 PO 19120 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 10-26-05 SEMINAR, MCKINLEY $110.00 Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 PO 19120 Cash Payment E 101-42110-434 Conference & Training 10-26-05 SEMINAR, NlCCUM $110.00 Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 PO 19120 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $330.00 Refer 83105 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (POLl Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 07-19-05 THRU 08-18-05 CELL PHONES $508.81 Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $508.81 Refer 83105 NORLANDER, JILL Cash Payment E 101-42400-305 Medical Services EYE EXAM REIMBURSEMENT $50.00 Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 83105 ROGERS, RICHARD Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Refer 83105 T-MOBILE CELL PHONE Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells Invoice 083105 8/31/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Refer 83105 Cash Payment Invoice 083105 Cash Payment Invoice 083105 Cash Payment Invoice 083105 Transaction Date Wells Fargo 10100 VERIZON WIRELESS (P/W) E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 8/31/2005 E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 8/31/2005 E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 8/31/2005 8/31/2005 ADVANCE 09-10-05 LEADERSHIP III $425.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $425.00 07-07-05 THRU 08-06-05 #848/#845 $136.14 Total $136,14 08-17-05 SHARE CELL PHONES 08-17-05 SHARE CELL PHONES 08-17-05 SHARE CELL PHONES Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.71 $20.71 $20.71 $62.13 -2604- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND City of Mound Payments 08/31/05 1:23 PM Page 2 Current Period: August 2005 10100 Wells Fargo $1,210.49 $425.00 $20.71 $20.71 $1,676.91 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $1,676.91 $1,676.91 -2605- i ty of M 0 u n d 09/08/0511:45 AM Page1 Payments CITY OF MOUND Batch Name Current Period: September 2005 090705SUE Payment Computer DollarAmt $1,104.77 Posted Refer 90705 HEITZ, FRANK Ck# 019309 9/7/2005 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2005 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $762.99 Invoice 090705 9/7/2005 Transaction Date 9/6/2005 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $782.99 Refer 90705 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Ck# 019308 9/7/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair BELT $8.07 Invoice N59083 9/7/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8.07 Refer 90705 KURTZ, JAMES Ck# 019310 9/7/2005 Cash Payment G 101-21715 Flex Plan Medical 2005 MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT $333.71 Invoice 090705 9/7/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $333.71 Fund Summary BATCH Total $1,104.77 10100 Wells Fargo 101 $1,096.70 222 $8.07 $1,104.77 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $1,104.77 $0.00 $1,104.77 -2606- CITY OF MOUND Batch Name 091305SUE Payments City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 1 Current Period: September 2005 User Dollar Amt $494,061.47 Computer Dollar Amt $494,061.47 $0,00 In Balance Refer 91305 4 SEASONS GLASS Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery SHOP SUPPLIES $240.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 91305 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 Cash Payment E 101-42110-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $84.45 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-05 GARBAGE SERVICE ~;84.45 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $168.90 Refer 91305 AMUNDSON, M. LLP Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $573.31 Invoice 185420 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $908.11 Invoice 185419 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R CIGARETTES $564.95 Invoice 186251 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,046.37 Refer 91305 ARCHITECTURAL SURFACES, INC. Cash Payment E 101-41910-500 Capital Outlay FA CEILING TILES $997.48 Invoice 69991-c 9/13/2005 PO 18567 Transaction Date 9/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $997.48 Refer 91305 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise Fo;R ICE Invoice 438523909 Cash Payment E Invoice 438523108 Cash Payment E Invoice 388523513 Cash Payment E Invoice 395518603 9/13/2005 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE 9/13~2005 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE 9/13/2005 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438516107 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438518311 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438518906 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Memhandise For R ICE Invoice 438519008 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438519613 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 438519709 9/13/2005 $96.13 $77.56 $74.02 $90.25 $166.24 $196.90 $87.8O $159.67 $112.69 $237.10 -2607- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Memhandise For R ICE Invoice 438524608 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 388524910 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 2 Current Period: SePtember 2005 $95.50 $78.82 10100 Total $1,472.68 Refer 91305 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs 07-16-05 08-12-05 DUMP REMEDIATION Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 91305 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE Invoice 40442000 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 34379700 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 32807600-B 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 34392000 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 34379700 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 34307000 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE Invoice 40406000 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 34467400 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR invoice 34449500 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255'Misc Merchandise For R MERCHANDISE Invoice 40471800 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR Invoice 34439500 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8~30/2005 $32,720.75 $32,720.75 $124.59 $3,224.15 $175.50 $2,492.65 $3,213.15 $2,029.55 $29.50 $2,559.90 $850.80 $194.77 -$20~17 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,874.39 Refer 91305 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-41110-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 508957 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 508957 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 508957 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-431 Meeting Expense COFFEE Invoice 508957 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo $25.34 $25.34 $12.66 $12,66 10100 Total $76.00 Refer 91305 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTRO0 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W267550 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W267551 9/13/2005 08-05 CENTERVIEW BEACH 08-05 MOUND BAY PARK $234.26 $434.52 -2608- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 3 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) 08-05 CITY HALL $234.26 Invoice W267550 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $903.04 Refer 91305 BLUE EARTH COUNTY COURT AD Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow CASE #05-0563 BOOKING #7424 $300.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/6/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer 91305 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS Cash Payment E 401-43110-500 Capital Outlay FA REQUEST #4 THRU 08-05 2005 STREET $276,125.43 IMPROVEMENT Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $276,125.43 Rear 91305 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery RETURN TRAILER -$64.40 Invoice N06994 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TRAILER CONNECTOR $41.73 Invoice N60923 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-221 Equipment Parts 5W-20, OIL FILTERS $47.58 Invoice N60494 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-221 Equipment Parts 5W-20, OIL FILTERS $47.58 invoice N30494 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts 5W-20, OIL FILTERS $47.57 Invoice N30494 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.06 Refer 91305 CASPER, DAVID Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND WATEPJSEWER $59.94 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.94 Refer 91305 CA T AND FIDDLE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $252.00 InvoiCe 41800 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $252.00 Refer 91305 CHAMPION AUTO Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery PANEL AIR FILTER,ETC $194.67 Invoice D336373 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $194~67 Refer 91305 CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT, I Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies RANGER LEATHER BUNKER $1,244.54 Invoice 46990 9/13/2005 PO 18863 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies RETURNED MERCHANDISE -$235.00 Invoice 46990 9/13/2005 PO 18863 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies ORANGE THROW BAG $45.10 ,Invoice 46881 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies GRIPPER HOSE SYSTEM $281.77 Invoice 47044 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,336.41 -2609- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 4 Payments Current Period: September 2005 Refer 91305 CLASSIFIEDS, ROUNDUP, LAKER, Cash Payment E 601-49400-328 Employment Advertising THRU 08-02-05 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $47.40 Invoice 181153 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-328 Employment Advertising THRU 08-02-05 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $47.40 Invoice 181153 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-430 Miscellaneous THRU 08-02-05 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT $23.70 Invoice 181153 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9~6~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $118.50 Refer 91305 COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $418.00 Invoice 80964189 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $401.20 Invoice 81026093 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $819.20 Refer 91305 COLOTTI, JOHN A. Cash Payment E 609-49750-305 Medical Services 2005 EYEWEAR REIMBURSEMENT $50.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/1950 Transaction Date 9/6/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Cash Payment Invoice 99570 Cash Payment Invoice 99570 Cash Payment Invoice 99570 Cash Payment Invoice 99570 Cash Payment Invoice 99570 Cash Payment Invoice 99570 Cash Payment Invoice 99570 Transaction Date Refer 91305 CONCEPT LANDSCAPING Cash Payment E 281-45210-533 Tree Removal DENBIGH CHANNEL $1,000.00 Invoice 2340 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00 Refer 91305 COPY IMAGES, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maint COntract 08-05 COPIER MAINTENANCE $341.80 Invoice 63889 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $341.80 Refer 91305 COVERALL CLEANING CONCEPTS E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 09-05 CLEANING SERVICE $1,166.18 9/13/2005 E 222-42260-460 Janitorial Services 09-05 CLEANING SERVICE $756.58 9/13/2005 E 101-42110-460 Janitorial Services 09-05 CLEANING SERVICE $504.38 9/13/2005 E 101-43100-460 Janitorial Services 09-05 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 9/13/2005 E 601-49400-460 Janitorial Services 09-05 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 9/13/2005 E 602-49450-460 Janitorial Services 09-05 CLEANING SERVICE $46.15 9/13/2005 E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 09-05 CLEANING SERVICE $199.15 9/13/2005 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,764.74 Refer 91305 CRETE WORKS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BREEZY RD, HANOVER/TUXEDO $763.67 Invoice 081305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BREEZY RD, HANOVER/TUXEDO $763.67 invoice 081305 9/13/2005 -2610- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 081305 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 5 Current Period: September 2005 E 602-49450-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery BREEZY RD, HANOVER/TUXEDO $763.66 9/13/2005 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,291.00 Refer 91305 CUSTOMIZED EMBROIDERY, INC Cash Payment E 101-42400-218 Clothing and Uniforms CLOTHING ALLOWANCE,NORLANDER $45.00 Invoice 1041 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.00 Refer 91305 DALEY, JEFF Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Rev-enu REFUND WATER/SEWER $81.97 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $81.97 Refer 91305 DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,173.10 Invoice 328693 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $36.10 Invoice 328694 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $162.00 Invoice 328163 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $906.00 Invoice 327701 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $55.90 Invoice 327702 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $53.00 Invoice 329723 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,272.75 Invoice 329722 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,658.85 Refer 91305 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $345.00 invoice 49891 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $11.00 Invoice 229029 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,784.05 Invoice 229028 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,541.95 Invoice 228940 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $22.00 Invoice 228941 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,002.20 Invoice 22900. 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,706.20 Rear 91305 ESS BROTHERS AND SONS, INCO Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts HDPE ADJ RING. $127.80 Invoice HH4208 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts HDPE ADJ RING $255.60 Invoice HH3945 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts C/P SANITARY $319.50 Invoice HH4605 9/13/2005 -2611- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 8/30/2005 City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 6 Current Period: September 2(~05 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $702.90 Refer 91305 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES Cash Payment G 601-16100 Fixed Asset-Land 01-08-05 THRU 08-15-05 RELOCATION $277.50 CONSULTANT Invoice 00-7229 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $277.50 Refer 91305 EXTREME BEVERAGE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $192.00 Invoice 334835 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.00 Refer 91305 FAMILY DIGEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 12-MONTH AD $40.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $40.00 Refer 91305 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 952-472-0600 $1,056.20 Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 942-472-0600 $440.09 Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 952-472-0600 $264.05 ~ Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 952-472-0635 $548.08 Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 952-472-0635 $548.08 Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 952-472-0635 $548.08 Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 952-472-0646 $19,55 Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone & Cells 08-05 952-472-0648 $667.58 Invoice 091305 9/12/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,091.71 Refer 91305 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-23-05 UNIFORMS $50.25 Invoice 6547582 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-23-05 UNIFORMS $19.01 Invoice 6547582 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-23-05 UNIFORMS $26.17 Invoice 6547582 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-23-05 UNIFORMS $8.73 Invoice 6547582 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 08-23-05 MATS $24.54 Invoice 6547582 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 08-23-05 MATS $24.54 Invoice 6547582 9/13/2005 i Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 08-23-05 MATS $24.54 Invoice 6547582 9/13/2005 -2612- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 7 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-223 Building Repair Supplies 08-30-05 MATS $51.73 Invoice 6553917 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-460 Janitorial Services 08-30-05 MATS $42.69 Invoice 6553913 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-30-05 UNIFORMS $50.23 Invoice 6553917 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-30-05 UNIFORMS $19.01 Invoice 6553915 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-30-05 UNIFORMS $26.17 Invoice 6553915 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 08-30-05 UNIFORMS $8.73 Invoice 6553915 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 08-30-05 MATS $26.00 Invoice 6553915 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 08-30-05 MATS $26.00 Invoice 6553915 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 08-30-05 MATS $26.00 Invoice 6553915 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41910-460 Janitorial Services 08-30-05 MATS $104.58 Invoice 6553918 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-06-05 UNIFORMS $50.38 Invoice 6560162 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-06-05 UNIFORMS $19.01 Invoice 6560162 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-06-05 UNIFORMS $26.04 Invoice 6560162 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 09-06-05 UNIFORMS $8.73 Invoice 6560162 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials 09-06-05 MATS $24.54 Invoice 6560162 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials 09-06-05 MATS $24.54 Invoice 6560162 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials 09-06-05 MATS $24.54 Invoice 6560162 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/8/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $736.70 Refer 91305 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies 08-05 WATER SERVICE $121.09 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41310-210 Operating Supplies 08-05 WATER SERVICE $34.01 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 08-05 WATER SERVICE $6.71 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $161.81 Refer 91305 GME CONSULTANTS Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 2355 CHATEAU LANE WATERTOWER $318.00 Invoice 23121 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Than BI 07-05 WELL #8 PUMPHOUSE $717.00 Invoice 23129 9/13/2005 Project PW0505 Transaction Date 8~30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,035.00 -2613- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 8 Current Period: September 2005 Refer 91305 GRAINGERS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies SAFETY CABINET,RAMP,ETC $1,052.93 Invoice 495-473908-4 9/13/2005 PO 19172 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,062.93 Refer 91305 GRAND PERE WINES, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $293.00 Invoice 13848 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $293.00 Refer 91305 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $323.75 invoice 74961 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $323.75 Refer 91305 GRIGGS COOPER AND COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,704.25 Invoice 277310 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $953.66 Invoice 277312 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750~251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $24.03 Invoice 277311 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $222.99 Invoice 282355 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,369.53 Invoice 280533 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $640.71 Invoice 280396 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,738.72 Invoice 280302 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$395.73 Invoice 674021 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $358.30 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,661.40 Invoice 283948 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$222.99 Invoice 674334 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,054.87 Refer 91305 HANSON, KANDIS Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs REIMBURSE EXPENSES $484.66 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs REIMBURSE EXPENSES $484.65 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $969.31 Refer 91305 HAWK LABELING SYSTEMS Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies LABELS, COLORED $100.70 OTInvoice 148162 9/13/2005 ransaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.70 Refer 91305 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED -2614- CiTY OF MOUND Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals Invoice 740412 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals Invoice DM121588 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9~7/2005 City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 9 Current Period: September 2005 CHLORINE, HYDROFLUOSILICIC ACID $602.98 CONTAINERS (6) $30.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $632.98 Refer 91305 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMA TIO Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals Invoice 25088030 9/13/2005 TranSaction Date 9/7/2005 Refer 91305 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S A Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners Invoice 723 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $840.38 Refer 91305 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR (R Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners 07-05 ROOM AND BOARD $2,184.50 Invoice 001103 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,184.50 Refer 91305 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 MAIL SETS $186.25 Invoice 2005-95 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $186,25 Refer 91305 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Invoice 368020 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Refer 91305 INFRATECH Cash Payment E 602-49450-221 Equipment Parts Invoice 0502282 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 08-05 RADIO LEASE $1,018.08 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,018.08 07-05 PROCESS/PER DIEM $840.38 BEER $342.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $342.00 TRAX ASSEMBLY $715.19 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $715.19 Refer 91305 ISLAND PARK SKELL Y Cash Payment Invoice 19072 Transaction Date E 222-42260-500 Capital Outlay FA 9/13/2005 9/7/2005 99 BLAZER TRANSMISSION $2,625.48 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,625.48 Refer 91305 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment Invoice 1945252 Cash Payment Invoice 1945251 Cash Payment Invoice 1945250 Cash Payment Invoice 1945249 Cash Payment Invoice 1945248 Cash Payment Invoice 1948682 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 9/13/2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 9/13/2005 E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 9/13/2005 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 9/13/2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 9/13/2005 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 9/13/2005 $709.70 $177.50 $25.99 $420.63 $593.95 $88,80 -2615- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 10 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $t,105.35 Invoice 1948683 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,163.77 Invoice 1948684 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WiNE $662.7,3 Invoice 1948685 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$6.67 Invoice 289429 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,482.02 Invoice 1952080 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $691.73 Invoice 1952079 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $875.38 Invoice 1952081 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale CREDIT-LIQUOR -$23.63 Invoice 289692 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,967.25 Refer 91305 JOHNSON, TIM Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2005 BOOT ALLOWANCE $150.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.00 Refer 91305 JUBILEE FOODS (FIRE DEPT) Cash Payment E 222-42260-216 Cleaning Supplies 08-24-05 CLEANING SUPPLIES $44.48 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-431 Meeting Expense 08-31-05 PSB MEETING $7.20 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $51.68 Refer 91305 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 08-26-05 LEMONS FOR RESALE $4.52 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 08-27-05 LIMES FOR RESALE $9.37 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 07-30-05 LEMONS FOR RESALE $7.97 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 07-29-05 CASE FRUIT FOR RESALE $19.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 08-29-05 CASE FRUIT RESALE $49.30 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 08-17-05 COUNCIL SUPPLIES $15,90 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-430 Miscellaneous 08-19-05 COUNCIL SUPPLIES $27.26 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $133.32 Refer 91305 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment G 601-16300 Improvements Other Thar~ BI 07-05 2373 CHATEAU WATERTOWER Invoice 67391 9/13/2005 Project PW0506 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE Invoice 67498-A 9/13/2005 $106.40 $275.0O -2616- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 11 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 455-46380-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 REDEV PROJECT AREA #1 $715.00 Invoice 67498-B 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance 07-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $2,539.23 Invoice 67498-C 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22955 5994 Chestnut Road, Ddvew 07-05 METRO PLAINS DEVELOPMENT $54.00 Invoice 67498-D 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 401-46377-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 CTY RD 15 REALIGNMENT $24.00 Invoice 67499-A 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 DREAMWOOD LAWSUIT $30.00 Invoice 67499-B 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 401-43103-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 2005 STREET RECONSTRUCTION $1,643.47 Invoice 67499-C 9/13/2005 Project PW0501 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 EXECUTIVE $930.00 Invoice 67499-D 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs 07-05 ADMINISTRATIVE $18.00 Invoice 67499-E 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23058 3106 Priest Lane #05-40 Don 07-05 3106 PRIEST LANE ~)5-40 $120.00 Invoice 67499-F 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23055 2125 Commerce #05-36 Sny 07-05 2125 COMMERCE ~O5-36 SNYDER $108.00 Invoice 67499-G 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23056 6375 Bartlett Bird #05-37 Va 07-05 6375 BARTLETT #05-37 RIVERS $36.00 Invoice 67499-H 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23027 3061 Westedge,Serempa Su 07-05 3061 WESTEDGE SEREMPA $60;00 Invoice 67499-1 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I 07-05 PLANNING MISC FEES $378.00 Invoice 67499-J 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 496-46580-500 Capital Outlay FA 07-05 PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING $639.41 Invoice 67499-K 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41600-318 Legal Parks 07-05 2385 BAYRIDGE ROAD EASEMENT $1,061.86 invoice 67499-L 9/13/2005' Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,738.37 Refer 91305 LAKER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment G 101-22855 MetroPlains Develop 00-64 08-27-05 PRELIMINARY PLAT $55.72 Invoice 8275 9/1312005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 08-20-05 ORDINANCE 13-2005 $51.74 Invoice 8275 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 09-03-05 ORDINANCE 14-2005 $47.76 Invoice 9305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing 09-03-05 ORDINANCE 15-2005 $59.70 Invoice 9405 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23035 6619 Bartlett Blvd #05-06 Va 08-20-05 #05-06 LEGAL NOTICE $82.50 Invoice 8215 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-23051 448 Denbigh #05-27 Johnso 08-20-05 #05-27 LEGAL NOTICE $61.87 Invoice 8225 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $359.29 Refer 91305 LAKER/PIONEER NEWSPAPER Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 08-27-05 DISPLAY AD $160.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $160.00 -2617- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: September 2005 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 12 Refer 91305 LANDFORM Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs 06-05 DUMP REMEDIATION $1,355.50 Invoice 11447 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,355.50 Refer 91305 LANO EQUIPMENT, INCORPORAT Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply RENTAL ON A TRENCHER $106.50 Invoice 133030 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $106.50 Refer 91305 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 101-43100-230 Shop Materials NUTS,BOLTS,FUSES,ETC $169.70 Invoice 3577815 9/13/2005 PO 19221 Cash Payment E 601-49400-230 Shop Materials NUTS,BOLTS,FUSES,ETC $169.70 Invoice 3577815 9/13/2005 PO 19221 Cash Payment E 602-49450-230 Shop Materials NUTS,BOLTS,FUSE$,ETC $169.70 Invoice 3577815 9/13/2005 PO 19221 Transaction Date 9/6/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $509.10 Refer 91305 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Cash Payment E 101-41110-434 Conference & Training 2005-2006 MEMBERSHIP DUES $6,910.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,910.00 Refer 91305 MARK VII DISTRIBUTOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$4~98 Invoice 1464 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,163.52 Invoice 834484 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $76.00 Invoice 834485 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $142.50 Invoice 15644 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $233.50 Invoice 835677 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $0.03 Invoice 837068 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,791.03 Invoice 837069 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $96.80 Invoice 839851 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,476.50 Invoice 839850 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT-BEER -$1.20 Invoice 828794-B 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,973.70 Refer 91305 MARLIN'S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 08-04-05 DELIVERY CHARGE $153.00 Invoice 16173 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight 08-08-05 DELIVERY CHARGE $56.00 Invoice 16187 9/13/2005 -2618- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 13 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 16208 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 16218 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 16241 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 16769 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 16777 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Refer 91305 METRO FIRE Cash Payment E 222-42260-500 CapitaIOutlay FA Invoice 20231-B 9/13/2005 PO 18667 Cash Payment E 222-42260-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 20232-B 9/13/2005 PO 18667 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies Invoice 202883-B 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/6/2005 08-11-05 DELIVERY CHARGE 08-15-05 DELIVERY CHARGE 08-18-05 DELIVERY CHARGE 08-25-05 DELIVERY CHARGE 09-29-05 DELIVERY CHARGE Wells Fargo 10100 $130.00 $15.00 $142.00 $196.00 $24.00 Total $716.00 PROLITE IN-LINE EDUCATOR STORAGE BRACKET STEM VALVE Wells Fargo 10100 $666.66 -$100.00 $38.02 Total $604.68 Refer 91305 METROPOLITAN AREA MANAGEM Cash Payment E 101-41310-431 Meeting Expense 08-24-05 LUNCHEON . $18.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18.00 Refer 91305 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment E 609-49750-401 Repairs/Maint Buildings 07-11-05 WINDOW WASH $37.28 Invoice 87018411 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8~23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $37.28 Refer 91305 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic 07-01-05 THRU 09-30-05 $4,605.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8~23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,605.00 Refer 91305 MINNESOTA PUBLISHING Cash Payment E 609-49750-340Advertising 09-05ADVERTISING $90.00 Invoice 2809 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $90.00 Refer 91305 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS COMPA Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-24-05 ASPHALT EMULSION $364.76 Invoice 48860 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-16-05 ASPHALT EMULSION $287.55 Invoice 48741 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 09-01-05 ASPHALT EMULSION $460.61 Invoice 48860 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,112.92 Refer 91305 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601-49400-470Water Samples Invoice 267516 9/13/2005 COLIFORM, MF - WATER $77.50 -2619- CITY OF MOUND Transaction Date 8/3012005 City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 14 Current Period: September 2005 Wells Fargo '1Ot O0 Total $77.50 Refer 91305 MINUTEMAN PRESS Cash Payment E 101-43100-203 Printed Forms BUSINESS CARDS $21.48 Invoice 5906 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-203 Pdnted Forms BUSINESS CARDS $5.37 Invoice 5906 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-203 Printed Forms BUSINESS CARDS $5.37 Invoice 5906 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $32.22 Refer 91305 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Cash Payment E 222-42260-180 Fire-Drill Pay 08-05 MAINTENANCE $877.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-190 Fire-Monthly Salaries 08-05 DRILLS $700.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-185 Fire-Maintenance Pay 08-05 SALARIES $5,008.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,585.00 Refer 91305 MOUND, ClTY OF Cash Payment E 609-49750-382 Water Utilities 07-05 WATER/SEWER $23.49 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/2312005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.49 Refer 91305 MUELLER, WILLIAM AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-05-05 BLACKTOP $415.65 Invoice 110069 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-08-05 BLACKTOP $62.41 Invoice 110132 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-10-05 BLACKTOP $432.44 invoice 110254 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-11-05 BLACKTOP $3,133.80 Invoice 110329 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-19-05 BLACKTOP $606.64 Invoice 110702 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-23-05 BLACKTOP $61.99 Invoice 110801 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-24-05 BLACKTOP $145.62 Invoice 110896 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-29-05 BLACKTOP $105.26 Invoice 111049 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials 08-31-05 BLACKTOP $316.62 invoice 111298 9/13~2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,280.43 Refer 91305 MUZAK - MINNEAPOLIS Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 09-05 MUSIC SERVICE $97.16 Invoice A594562 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $97.16 Refer 91305 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS (PAR -2620- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08~05 11:38 AM Page 15 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 07-19-05 THRU 08,18-05 612-221-6740 $32.59 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 07-19-05 THRU 08-18-05 612-221-6794 $14.01 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 07-19-05 THRU 08-18-05 612-221-6812 $81.42 Invoice 091305 9/1312005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone & Cells 07-19-05 THRU 08-18-05 612-221-8385 $33.66 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 07-19-05 THRU 08-18-05 612-363-5883 $27.28 invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8~26/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $188.96 Refer 91305 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply SUCTION HOSE, BLADE,ETC $103.15 Invoice 091305' 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $103.15 Refer 91305 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/1312005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-200 Office Supplies invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302329175-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies Invoice 303119471-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-42110-200 Office Supplies Invoice 302376571-001 9/13/2005 PO 19115 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies Invoice 303193976-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-41310-200 Office Supplies invoice 303193489-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies invoice 302362916-001 9/13/2005 PO 19163 MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES MISCELLANEOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES INK JET CARTRIDGE INKJET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE INK JET CARTRIDGE RIBBON,DISKS,ETC APPOINTMENT CALENDAR INK JET CARTRIDGE LABELING SYSTEM $7.10 $7.10 $7.10 $7.10 $7,10 $2.38 $4.73 $4.73 $35.36 $35,36 $35.36 $95.2O $112.66 $11,82 $118.45 $14.61 -2621 - CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 16 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301978842-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 301975918-001 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies invoice 301731107-001 9/13/2005 PO 19161 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 INK JET CARTRIDGE $86.52 FILE FOLDERS $13.44 FILE FOLDERS $38.34 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $644.46 Refer 91305 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $525.00 Invoice 8080090 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $43.75 Invoice 8079741 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$56.98 Invoice 8079326 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,148.00 Invoice 8079401 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,659.77 Refer 91305 PEDERSON, GREG Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies REIMBURE PHOTOS $22.72 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $22.72 Refer 91305 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $206.00 Invoice 04945569 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $177.00 Invoice 04945666 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $383.00 Refer 91305 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,968.74 Invoice 2231196 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $34.75 Invoice 2231198 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,203.85 Invoice 2231197 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $183.55 Invoice 2233665 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $964.10 Invoice 2233666 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $34.75 Invoice 2233667 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,215.15 Invoice 2236106 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $81.55 Invoice 2236105 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$4~48 Invoice 3322886 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$157.30 Invoice 3323006 9/13/2005 -2622- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 3323007 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 17 Current Period: September 2005 ~:~,~ ~! ~: E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$88.00 9/13/2005 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,436.66 Refer 91305 PLUNKET-FS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic AUG,SEPT,OCT PEST CONTROL $42.40 Invoice 764550 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.40 Refer 91305 QUALITY WINE AND SPIRITS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $714.48 Invoice 592604-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MiX $113.77 Invoice 59211 0-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $425.52 Invoice 592100-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,196.81 Invoice 595591-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,112.23 Invoice 595362-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale CREDIT-WINE -$28.83 Invoice 588329-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $571.73 Invoice 597810-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $256.07 Invoice 5981402-00 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,363.78 Refer 91305 RAHN, JODI L. Cash Payment E 101-41310-305 Medical Services EYE REIMBUSEMENT $50.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Rear 91305 Cash Payment Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22802 Festival Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22802 Festival Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 RANDY'S SANITATION E 101-41910-384 Refuse/Garbage Dispos 08-05 GARBAGE SERVICE $117.11 FESTIVAL DUMPSTER CTY RD 110 $223.56 FESTIVAL DUMPSTER AUDITORS ROAD $223.56 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $564.23 Refer 91305 REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals Invoice R07051070 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-418 Other Rentals Invoice R08051105 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Refer 91305 SBC MINNCOMM PAGING Cash Payment E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 AIR AND OXYGEN $22.45 AIR AND OXYGEN $23.12 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.57 08-05 PAGERS $87.60 -2623- CITY OF MOUND Cash Payment Invoice 091305 Transaction Date City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 18 Current Period: September 2005 E 222-42260-325 Pagers-Fire Dept. 09-05 PAGING SERVICE $193.20 9/13/2005 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $280.80 Refer 91305 SCHARBER AND SONS Cash Payment E 101-45200-409 Other Equipment Repair OIL FILTERS, ETC $35.89 Invoice 02-2051263 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $35.89 Refer 91305 SENTRY SYSTEMS, INCORPORAT Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 09-05 BURGLARY MONITORINING $46.16 Invoice 455120 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic 09-05 FIRE MONITORING $46.16 invoice 453921 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $92.32 Refer 91305 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, IN Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous 08-31-05 PUBLICATION $12.50 Invoice 916887 . 9/13/2005 · Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $12.50 Refer 91305 SHoREWOoD TREE SERVICE Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal CEMETARY BRUSH PILE $400.00 Invoice 5495 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 281-45210-533Tree Removal LOST LAKE REMOVAL $319.50 Invoice 5516 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal 5454 BREEZY ROAD $1,350.00 Invoice 5517 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,069.50 Refer 91305 SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER COMP Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 2005 SERVICE CONTRACT BALANCE DUE $43.03 Invoice 70163283 9~23/2005 Transaction Date 8/22/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $43.03 Refer 91305 SMITH, LINCOLN Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu REFUND WATER/SEWER Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 $102.08 Total $102.08 Refer 91305 SPECIALTY WINES AND BEVERAG Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $180.00 Invoice 4286 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.00 Refer 91305 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA (FIR Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $387.90 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $387.90 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $775.80 Cash Payment E 101-42400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $7.63 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 -2624- City of Mound 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 19 Payments CITY OF MOUND Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $16.80 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $16.80 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $16.80 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-45200-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $1,203.06 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,261.09 Refer 91305 SPEEDWA Y SUPERAMERICA (POL Cash Payment E 101-42110-212 Motor Fuels THRU 08-26-05 GASOLINE CHARGES $2,591.O1 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 . Total $2,591.01 Refer 91305 ST. CROIX RECREATION COMPAN Cash Payment G 101-22801 Deposits/Escrow Invoice 14454 9/13/2005 PO 18914 Cash Payment E 281-45210-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 14454 9/13/2005 PO 18914 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo Refer 91305 STREICHER'S Cash Payment G 101-22803 Police Reserves Invoice 1288174-P 9/13/2005 PO 19110 PICNIC SHELTERS $596.84 PICNIC SHELTERS $3,300.00 10100 Total $3,896.84 UNIFORM, HUGHES,T. $94.90 Transaction Date 8/31/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $94.90 Refer 91305 STS CONSULTANTS Cash Payment G 101-22908 Mound Harbor Renaissance THRU 08-13-05 MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE $300.00 Invoice 108890 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer 91305 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery TIRES $276.69 Invoice 10037790 9/13/2005 PO 19214 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair 06-15-05 SERVICE CALL $127.28 Invoice 10038286 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $403.97 Refer 91305 SUPERIOR FORD FLEET/GOVERN Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLIES $892.25 Invoice 30-419696 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/6/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $892.25 Refer 91305 SWARTZER, KEVIN Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply BALES OF STRAW $24.00 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9~6/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $24.00 Refer 91305 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $54.90 invoice 383328 9/13/2005 -2625- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 20 Current Period: September 2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $123.50 Invoice 384572 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $9,511.15 Invoice 384573 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale ' BEER $368.50 Invoice 38998 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $81.30 Invoice 383798 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,016.25 Invoice 383799 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $125.50 Invoice 38549 9/13~2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,241.35 Invoice 385365 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $310.00 Invoice 39095 9/13~2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20,832.45 Refer 91305 THYSSEN-KRUPP ELEVATOR COR Cash Payment E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic 09-01-05 THUR 11-30-05 $547.45 Invoice 327625 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $547.45 Refer 91305 TRUE VALUE, MOUND Cash Payment E 222-42260-322 Postage Invoice 9523 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 UPS/FED EX SHIPPING $9.38 08-05 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES $110.67 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.05 Refer 91305 US BANK TRUST NA TIONAL ASSO Cash Payment E 396-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees PSB LEASE REV BONDS 2002 $950.00 Invoice 1559325 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $950.00 Refer 91305 VERIZON WIRELESS (P/W) Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone & Cells 08-10-05 CELL PHONE $13.47 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone & Cells 08-10-05 CELL PHONE $188.30 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone & Cells 08-10-05 CELL PHONE $228.49 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone & Cells 08-10-05 CELL PHONE $106.22 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Cash Payment G 101-22816 Personal Cell Phone 08-10-05 CELL PHONE $229.95 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $766.43 Refer 91305 VINOSOURCE, LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $437.50 12283 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $437.50 -2626- CITY OF MOUND City of Mound Payments Current Period: September 2005 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 21 WINE Transaction Date 8/30~2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 91305 WACONIA FORD MERCURY Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Repairs/Maint Machinery #84 REPAIRS $66.03 Invoice C31080 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $66.03 Refer 91305 WEIST, KATHY Cash Payment E 222-42260-322 Postage REIMBURSE POSTAGE $13.65 Invoice 091305 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/7/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13.65 Refer 91305 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $830.35 Invoice 122539-00 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale $549.75 Invoice 122799-00 9/13/2005 $1,380.10 Refer 91305 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $248.80 Invoice 132360 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,108.35 Invoice 133865 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/23/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,357.15 Refer 91305 WORLD CLASS WINES, INCORPO Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $605.00 Invoice 168131 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $605.00 Refer 91305 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electdc Utilities Invoice 51-602835-9 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 9/1/2005 #51-6002835-9 SIREN Wells Fargo 10100 $21.99 Total $21.99 Refer 91305 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 57151321 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 57151321 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 57151321 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 57152471 9/13/2005 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 57152471 9/13/2005 Transaction Date 8/30/2005 ZEP 40 ZEP 40 ZEP 40 CLEANIN~ SUPPLIES ZEP 40 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $20.61 $20.61 $20.60 $147.18 $147.18 $356.18 -2627- CITY OF MOUND Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 396 2002-HRA Lease Revenue Bonds 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 455 TIF 1-2 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan 496 HRA PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND City of Mound Payments 09/08/05 11:38 AM Page 22 Current Period: September 2005 10100 Wells Fargo $41,2O9.98 $16,329.89 $4,655.86 $95O.O0 $277,792.90 $1,199.66 $34,560.90 $639.41 $9,284.42 $3,463.67 $103,974.78 $494,061,47 Pre-Written Check Checks to be Generated by the Compute Total $0.00 $494,061.47 $494,061.47 -2628- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. __-2005 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE CHAPTER 155 AS IT RELATES TO THE CITY COUNCIL The City of Mound does ordain: Subsection 155.01, Subd. 1, Regular Meetings, is hereby amended to read as follows: Subd. 1. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Council shall be held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each calendar month at 7:30 7:00 P.M. Any regular meeting falling upon a holiday shall be held on the next following business day at the same time and place. All meetings, including special and adjourned meetings, shall be held in the City Hall. Subsection 155.15 is hereby amended to read as follows: 155.15 O."dc." cf B'--'=!.-.cs=. Meeting Agenda The Clerk shall prepare an agenda of business for each regular Council meeting and file a copy in his/her office not later than one day before the meeting T~,~ crd=r of b'Jsln~ss and Copies thereof shall be delivered to each Council member and to the official newspaper of the City as far in advance of the meeting as time for' preparation will permit. No item of business shall be considered unleSs it appears on the agenda for the meeting or is approved for the addition to the agenda by a unanimous vote of the Council members present. \./ \,--/ /".t \ \,..,/ \,/ /~\ \,.-/ /'7\ \'/ V"'/ /Q\ \,-,/ \,v/ \, ,! \ '~! ['~,~11 ~ r~r~r Rcll c~ll D, ~1;~ New business 1 -2629- Passed by the City Council this 13th day of September, 2005. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Published inThe Laker the 24th day of September, 2005, Effective the 25th day of September, 2005. -2630- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 05- RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota: Fees shall be hereby established. In the event of a conflict between this schedule and the City Code, the fee schedule shall prevail. An application or code provision may require payment of fees for consultation with experts, professionals or other qualified persons or for other matters, which may result in the imposition of a fee greater than listed in this fee schedule. ADMINISTRATIVE FEES & CHARGES 400.20 Assessment search Comprehensive Plan Copies Faxes Duplicate license/permit Duplicate meeting tapes Board and Commissions Minutes (not Council) Notary (set by State) Recycling container purchase Recycling container replacement Returned Check Zoning Ordinance COBRA Continuation Administration Fee Administration Fee for delinquent utility bills (to prepare for certification) Certification Fee (per parcel) AMUSEMENT & COMMERCIAL RECREATION Amusements: (Set by State) Expire April 30 410.10 Mechanical Amusement Machines Arcades: Expire Dec. 31st 405.00 Arcade Permit (fee per machine) Bowlinq: Expire April 30 420.05 Bowling (fee per alley) $20/search $30 .25/page .25/page $10 each $3/tape .25/page $1 each at cost at cost $30/check $20 2% $25/account $25/account $15/Iocation+ $15/machine $15/Iocation + $15/machine $20~r. 1 -2631 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 05- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RECONVEYANCE OF TAX FORFEITED PROPERTY PID #19-117-23-32-0128 WHEREAS, the applicants are seeking the release for sale of tax forfeited property, PID #19-117-23-32-0128, Wychwood, Lot 26, Block 11, and WHEREAS, the Parks and Open Space Advisory Commission considered the request at its October 14, 2004 meeting and unanimously recommended approval of the applicants' request, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the request at its October 18, 2004 meeting and unanimously recommended approval of the applicants' request, and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their meeting of November 9, 2004, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, that said property shall revert to the State of Minnesota and then be offered for sale to adjacent property owners. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of September, 2005. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2632- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472.3190 REPORT TO: Dock & Commons Advisory Commission FROM: Jim Fackler, Park superintendent DATE: August 12, 2005 SUBJECT: PUblic Lands Permit OWNER/APPLICANT: Mike & Sara McCue LOCATION', 4687 Island View Drive Devon Commons PID: 30-117-2322 00008 SUMMARY The applicant, Mike & Sara McCue are requesting approval of a Public. Lands Permit to install irrigation and stairs in the dp rap along citY controlled shoreline on Devon*Commons. BACKGROUND This portion of Devon Commons currently has a utility easement and red rock rip rap. REVIEW PROCEDURE According to Chapter 320.01 of the City COde, No special permit shall be issued unless approved by simple majority of the City. Council Members. (ORD. 108- 2000, 7/16/00) CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW BUILDING OFFICIAL ........No Comment. PUBLIC WORKS .............Approve with condition that city not responsible In the event the irrigation system is disrupted ~vhile Doing needed maintenance. -2633- PARKS SUPERINTENDENT., Plan look good, STAFF COMMENTS The Property owner at 4687 Island View Drive must provide a letter agreeing to not hold the city responsible if system is disrupted during maintenance to utilites. The stairway be installed in a manner to not allow erosion from the lake. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends DCAC of the Public Lands Permit located at Devon Commons 4687 Island View Drive subject to the following conditions: 1. The appliCant shall be responsible for payment of all involved feeS and costs associated with the request. 2. The Public Landsfee not be charged to the applicant due to the project being under $1;000. -2634- CITY OF MOUND 534t Maywood IR0ac[, Mound. MN 5364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 P.UBLIC LANDS.. APPLICATION Dock,.Commission Date city Council Date ~'~'~ DISTRIBUTION V/ Building Official Check One Parks Director DNR MOWD Public Works Otb er FI. CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT - new construction. NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUS ES OR OTHE'R.B:UILD1NGS ON PUBLIC LAND (Cit~ Code Section 320, Subd. 1). [] PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE. PERMIT -.to allow repairs to'an existing structure (City Code Section 320,. Subd, ,3). r-] CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is, condition .(City Code Section 320, Subd. 3), LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc..(City Code Section 320, Subd. 4). The structure or work you are requesting is an actMty on' publicly owned lands. Structure~:. like boat houses, Patios, sheds, etc: are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these'uses into conforrr~ance, which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All Permits are granted for a limtted time and are non-transferable; Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the - permit is for new construction, or a new permit is appiied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please type or print legibly -APPLICANT i ABUTTING PROPERTY LEGAL DE$C. Address ~(--~ ~ Phone (H) f'l-¢/"~"~ IF----~c~ (W) ~''' ~¢2...¢~[~2 (M) ~'-S-3~/-d¢~ J~_~ Lot BIook Subdivision ZONING'DISTRICT R-1 R-lA R-2 R;3 Plat # B-1 B-2 B-3 Public Lands. Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 0'11'!6,/03 U'BLiC Name PROPERTY · .. ' . Phone (H) PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT ,(INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE ~l~- ~~.., Il \ Public Land's Permit Application Page 2 of 2 Revised 0~/'~ 8/03 -2636- PRIME MO RTGAGE 'CORP ORATION Date: August 3, 2005 Mike McCue 4.687 Island View Drive Mound, Mn. 55364' RE: ' Easement'f0r Septic system TO Whom It May Concern, · I asked the city. to approve my plan to put a. in ground sprinkler system in my yard this' fall. I have a survey with' the easement draw 'in and. I' agree that if the city needs to repair the system i will cover anY damages or repairs to the sprinkersystem. If you have anY other questions please call my cell phone at' 612-578-6695. Thank you for your time Sincerely, / Mike McCUe 612-578-66.95 Prime Mortgage Corporation 11100 Wayzata [llvd, Suite 200, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Phone: (952) 544C_'~37_c(952) 544-3233 ,Dertlflcate of Survey for Oohn Gabos Lots 18 & 19 Block 1, DEVON Hennepln County, MlnnesoCa / / / / / / / LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES SURVEYEg: Lot 19 and Lot .18 exceP~ the souC*heaster[y 25 feet front and rear, Block 1., DEVON, including the adjacent 1 foot of Roanoke access. This survey intends to show tl)e boundaries of the above described property, and the )ocatlon of an existing house, decks and ~uaLhouse thereon. It Odes not purport co show any otl)er imp.rove'merits or en- croachments. : Iron marker found o : Iron marker set Bearings shown are based upon an assumed datum. ~_~_!] : Spot elevation, mean sea IeveI datum RECEIVED JUN 3 1992 MOUND.PLANNING & INGP, I hereby certiry lhn! this survey was prepared by me or under my direct super- vision, and that ! am a duJy re§istered Civil P-nl~in~r and L~nd Surveyor under the laws el thc State of Minnesota. Mark q. Gronbe~ Minnesota' Licunse"~umbur 12755 o^1~ 6-1-g2 SCALE 1" ,, 20' JO~ NO. 9~-2A3 ,¢z-.,,,,¢~ -2638- Default Page 1 of 2 H Hennepin County property Hap IllJ llll!; 4705 lll~, ~n 4687 4673 4960 No Last update: 715/2005 at g:o0 AM -- READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOVV Click for.detailed infermation on this parcel Property'lD Approximate Property Approximate Property Perimeter Area 30-117-23-22-0009 462 ft. tl,947 sq.ff. = 0.27 acres Property Address Market Value ' Total Tax (2005') 4687 ISLAND VIEW' DR MOUND. MN 55364 $706,000 $7,287.96 Give us your feedb~c Henne._~pin County Su How ~ For quicker respom iclforntation on surf, off 'Ftecenter on clic Show: N:o Aerial Photos Aor'~ts 2004* [] City Names [] ~treet Names [] Address Number [] Lot Dimensions ~tpls. ~u~fiale south of Fran from. 2003 The.data confalned on this page are derived from a compilation .of reCOrds and maps and may contain discrepancies ~hat can onl licensed land surveyor..The perimeter and area Csquara footage and acres) are approximates and may. contain discrepancies, Th purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not r~sponsible for any mi: derivatives, Please repo~c any map discrepancies to the Hennepln County Survey Division via e-mall at Surveyor. Maps~co.hennepil The quallb/of the display may be Influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at [02~x768 or highe~ Explorer 3.02 or Ne~cape 2.0! or latar version for proper operation. Home. i Your County Government J Licenses, Certificates,, & Registration I Employment & Volunteering I .Heal~, Hous, ing, 8~ Social Services J Law, Public Safety, & Courts J Environment, Property, & Transportal;:lon Copyright © 2005 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepin.us btm ://www 13.co.hermeoimmn. us/oublicv areelim~-°-~e-e~'~lt' asox?PZ~3~- II~ 3011723220009_ 7/26/2005 Page ! of 2 Address: Iqunlcip~lity: School Di~t: W~temhed: 5ewer Diet: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Parcel Data for ,Taxes .Payable 2005 30-zz7.23-22-0009 46~7 ~SLAND V~EW DR ,MOUND 2.77 Construction year: 3 App~x. 'Pa~ Size: 7~ X t50 MIKE MC CUE &' SARA MC CUE MICHAEL.A MC CUE 4687 ISLAND VIEW DR MOUND .MN 55364 Most .Current 'Sales' Information Sales prices are reported as listed on ~he Certificate arms-length transactions. Sale Date: December, '2001 Sale Price: $679,000 Traneaction Type: Warranty Deed Tax Parcel Descriptio. n Addition Name: -Lot: 'Block: .Metes & Bounds: DEVON 001 LOT :L9 AND NWLY t/2 OF LOT ~8 INCL AD:] VAC 1.FOOT OF ROANOKE ACCESS AbM~act or Torrens: E~imated Marke~ Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market'Value: Total Xmprovement Amount: Total Net Tax:. Total SpeCial A~es~ment~: Solid, Waste Fee: Total Tax: TORRENS Value and Tax .Summary for Taxes Payable 2005 Values Established by Assessor as of 3anuar~,,, 2r 2004 $766,000 $584,500' $584,500 '$7,194.74 $93.2.2 $7,287.96 Property Tnformation Detail for Taxes Payable 2005 Values Established. bY Assessor as of 3anuary..2.,. 2004 Land Narket Building Narket Machinery Narket Land Limited' Building Limited Values:' Total Market: $428,000 $338,000 $766,000 $326,600 $257,900' http'./Iwww2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pin./pfin~.jsp?pid=30 t 1723220009 -2640- 7/26/2005 Dert~.flcate of Survey for ~ohn'.G:abos Lots 18 & lg, Block 1, DEVON Hennepln County, ~lnneso'~a / / / / / / / ,/ / / / / LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMI-SE$ SURVEYED: Lot 19 and LO% 18 except the southeasterly 25 feet front and rear, Block 1, DEVON, lncludln§ %he adjacent I foot of Roanoke access. This survey Intends ~o show the boundaries of the adore Oe$c~jbe~ proper%y, and %he location o~ an ex~sting house, decks and boathouse ~hereon. I~ does nD% purport ~o show any other improvements or en- croachments. · : Iron marker found o : Iron marker set Bea,~l~gs shown are based upon' an aSsuRed datum. ~_=~3 : Spo= elevation, mean sea ieve[ datum RECEIVED JUN 3 1992 MOUND PLANNING & 1~ -2642- -2643- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 REPORT TO: Park & Open Space Advisory Commission FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent DATE: August 2, 2005 SUBJECT: Rip RaP OWNER/APPLICANT: Kirk Bemhagen LOCATION: 4539 Island View Ddve Devon Commons PID: 30-117-23 21 00001 SUMMARY The applicant, Kirk Bemhagen, is requesting approval of a Public Lands Permit to rip rap about 171 I_nfl of city controlled shoreline on Devon Commons, BACKG ROUND This portion of Devon Commons currently had red rock rip rap that is not up to the'currant city approved standard for new.or replacement rip rap of fieldstone. REVIEW PROCEDURE According to Chapter 320.01 of the City Code, No special permit shall be issued unless approved by simple majority of the City Council Members. (ORD. 108- 2000, 7/16/00) CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Staff believes that there is no need for other departmental review due to the work being requested is general maintenance in nature that is done prior to the current rip rap needing replacement. -2644- AGENCY REVIEW The City will have to make application to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District being that the City is the shoreline property owner. STAFF COMMENTS The proposed rip mp and application costs will be the responsibility of the property owner at 4539 Island View Drive. The dp rap installed will meet current City recommended Standard of fieldstone and Minnehaha Creek Watershed/DNR 'requirements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends DCAC of the Public Lands Permit located at Devon Commons 4539 Island View Drive subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved fees rip rap costs associated with the request. 2. The Public Lands fee not be charged to the applicant. -2645- -2646- 22647- CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 5364 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 PUBLIC LANDS. APPLICATION Application Fee: $200 (if p~ject Dock.CommisSion Date ?~,, _5 DISTRIBUTION valuation is $1,000 or more) Date Received ~'~-Z~-~ .!~ '~1~'~ City Council Date Building Official ~ DNR Pa rks Director MC:WD Public Works Otb er Check One CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT - new construction. NOTE.: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BoAT HOUS ES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (Cit~/Code Section 320, Subd. 1). PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT- to allow repairs to an.existi ng structure (City Code Section 320., Subd. 3). CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition ('City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc.. (City Code Section 320, Subd. 4). mture or work you are requesting is an' activity on publicly owned lands. Structur~ like boat houses, patios, etc. are all NONCONFORMING' USES. It is the intent of. the City to bring all these uses. into conformance, which means that those structures will' at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All Permits are granted for a limited time and are non-transferable: Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a.new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please type or print legibly ABUSING Address PROPER~ LEGAL 'Lot DESC, Subdivision ZONING DISTRICT 'R-1 Public Lands Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 04/16/03 - 2648- . PROPERTY Dock Site #. /~"'~ _ Shoreline Type, Phone (H) ~7¢- ~¢~ (W),~W- PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS) DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE AppliCant's Signatur ' Public Lands Permit Application Page 2 of 2 'Revised 01/16103 - 2649- · Permit # / SHORELI.NE ER. OSI.ON PROTECTION - FAST TRACK t~Ei~MIT'~ MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (MCWD) 8202 Minnetonka Blvd. · · Deephaven, MN 55391 Ph: 952-471-05.90' · i ~ Fax: 952-471-0682 ' .(P~~'er)- - ~ .J __ (Street Add,sa) ~Om~ , ~~ ~¢¢~' ~)'0' ~//request approval to install riprap . ' (C~) - (~t~) (~p) .... (Phone) · ' , A · ~ ~, A i J ' ~ . (~reet address) ' / ~e dpmp in~lla~on ~E~ ~e C~ boundarieS) (Count) I .(~pe~ I~ ~ [~) ~ , ' {Uneai feet) ~ ' (~ke) (B~y) a~ordance wi~ the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Dis~ Shoreline Prote~ion Guideline for dpmp Pla~ment mqui~ for issuance of a Fast Track General PetE. I have co~ed.with , ( ) (Name of Company) (Street address) (City) (Zip) (Phone) , to perform the work who is familiar with the technical (Bond Number) requirements and has fulfilled the bonding requirements of the watershed distdct (see page .ad and und... nd/he requirements of the MCWD rala, ng to Shore,,e Ero-.ion // ~ ~;~of Prop~y C)~'vner) ^ (Date) ~ . ' ' ~ '~""J~. NOTAI~PUBUC.I~NNE$OTA ~ I 'Approved by:r Date Distribution: __Property Owner _Contractor __Municipality __DNR page 1 of 2 _Distflct File -2650- / / / / ? ? ? ? ? I /, I 1." .,'/ I -2652- L °1 REPORT TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Jim Fackler, Park Superintendent DATE: August 30, 2005 SUBJECT: Rip Rap OWNER/APPLICANT: Steve Bedell 4957 Island View Drive Devon Commons PID: 25-117-24 12 0003 SUMMARY The applicant, Steve Bedell, is requesting approval of a Public Lands Permit to rip rap about 120 Lnft of city-controlled shoreline on Devon Commons. BACKGROUND This portion of Devon Commons currently had red rock rip rap this is not up to the current city approved standard for new or replacement rip rap of fieldstone. REVIEW PROCEDURE According to Chapter 320.01 of the City Code, No special permit shall be issued unless approved by simple majority of the City Council Members. (ORD. 108-2000, 7/16/00) CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Staff believes that there is no need for other departmental review due to the work being requested is general maintenance in nature that is done prior to the current rip mp needing replacement. AGENCY REVIEW The City will have to make application to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District being that the City is the shoreline property owner. -2653- STAFF COMMENTS The proposed rip rap and application costs will be the responsibility of the property owner at 4957 Island View Drive. The rip rap installed will meet current City recommended Standard of fieldstone and Minnehaha Creek Watershed/DNR requirements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends DCAC of the Public Lands Permit located at Devon Commons 4957 Island View Drive subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall be responsible for paymem of all involved fees rip mp costs associated with the request. 2. The Public Lands fee not be charged to the applicant. -2654- -2655- '-To Permit.# - SHORELINE EROSION PROTECTION - FAST TRACK PERMIT MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (MCWD) t8202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN 55391 Ph: 952-471-0590 . . Fax: 952-4770682 , (~pe.y.ow.e~) · / . (s~!~rc.s) - ' - I JOf~l,~) , ~~,~.~ ~ -~'1/ request appm~'al t6 ,nstali.dprap · ¥ (C~) ' (stat~) (ap) " (Phone) shorelilT/e emsionlProtectiOn qr{~ropeity descnbe~ as (1~ ~"~ ~ ~ , located in '! address {tJneal f~t)!; ' ' ..... ''" ' . - (Lake) .',' ' (1~., , .'~. accordance with the Mi~nehaha Creek Watershed District ShoralinePrOteCtion Guideline for dprap placement required for issuance of a Fast Track General Permit. I have contracted.with (Name of Company) (Street address) (City) (Zip) (Phone) ,..to perform the work who is familiar wi_th the technical . '~ (Bond N.umber) ~'.,~;.; · ~'. requirements and has fulfilled~le bonding requirements of the watershed district (see page ~l..h~ve mad,,,,, and und..e,l~n~.he_ requirements of..the MCWD relating.to Shoreline Erosion" / S~,C~scribed and sworn to before me on this Ok-) . day of 1 ~~ . , 20fda) /~ Notary-Public -- ~L~ NOTN~I~JaUC-MI.NESOT~, ' Approved by:. Date I Disfitbulion: __Property Owna' __Co~tract~' --Municipality .._DNR .._District File Page 1 of 2 -2656- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MaYwood Road, Mound, MN 5364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 PUBLIC LANDS. APPLICATION Application Fee: $200 (if project valUation is $1,000 or more) Dock,Commission Date City Council Date DISTRIBUTION Building Official DNR Date Received Pa rks Director 'MCWD Check One Public Works Other CO'NSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT- new construction. NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (city Code Section 320, Subd. 1). PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT - to allow repairs to an existing structure (City Code Section 320, Subd, 3). CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, etc.. (City Code Section 320, Subd. 4). The structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned lands. StructureS. like boat houses, patios, sheds, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance, which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. All permits are granted for a limited time and are non-transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please type or print legibly APPLICANT Name ~-~TEV~ ~::~E L.~, (./(._ Phone (~""/o'~ %:'¥-7 0 ~ (W)~ 0 ~'-"g~_O <:~ (M) ABUTTING Address PROPERTY LEGAL Lots H'f %4 G Block C~% S bdiv ,on. L P_z O k] ZONING DISTRICT R-1 ~-IA~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-$ Public Lands Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 01/16/03 - 2657- UBLIC Name ROPERTY Dock Site # Shoreline Type CONTRACTOR Name ~ iO~ 000 PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (.INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE Public Lands Permit Application Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/i6/03 - 2658- N FOR: CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Ir. /eve Bedell 0 Denotes iron monument · Denotes found monument ----..- Denotes Surface Drainage x 000,0 Denotes existing elev. LEC. gL DESCRIP]~OH' Lois 4, 5 and ~ Block ZZ, DEYOH Parcel,4.' ['6000 S~. FI,,] Lots 6, Block PZ, DEVON, and/he soulbwes/edy 2000 fe~t of Lot 5. so/~ Block Rd Lots d, Blaak 2Z, DZVOI~, and that pad of Lot 5, so/~ Block'.Zd ~hg northeasterly of/he southwesterly ZOO0 feel of sa/b' Lo/5. ./ PARCEL A: Proposed Top of F'dn Elev, = 956.4 Proposed Garage Floor Elev. = 9,36. I Proposed Lowest F~oor Ele¥. 9.33.2 PARCEL B: Proposed Top of Fd. Elev. = 957.6 Praised Garage Roar Elev, = 937.3 Propos~ Lowest ~oor Elev. 934.4 -PROPOSED HARDCOVER- -EX~SI~NO HARL~COVER- Building 1,954 Sq. Ft. PARCEL A: Patios · Decks 664 Sq. Ft. Building 1,077.5 Sq. Ft. Conc. Walks &~ Drive 1,7$2Sq. FL Conc. Sudoce 722.5 ~q. Londscopin~ 32 Sq. FL . Tofol Ho~cover 1,800 Total Hordcover 4,362 Sq. FL Existing Parcel ~eo - 6,000 Sq. Ft. Existing Panel Area = 12,000.21 Sq. ~. ~ of Hardco~r ~ 30 · ~ of Ho~cover = 36.3 ~ PARCEL B: Building 1,800 Total Hardcover 1,800 Existing Parcel Area ~ 6,~0 Sq. Ft. ~ of Hordcove= -- 30 ~ Revised: 6/16/2005 Revised: 5/20/2005 · ., ~,~, I hereby certify that this survey, plan or repo~ was prepared by me or under D~J~_~.~'. my direct supervision and that I om o duly Registered Land Surveyor under fhe .ND SURVEYORS, INC Laws of the Store of Minnesota. · 5030 Harbor Lone No. A~ su~d by me this 14th day of April, 2005. >~y~o~th UN. ~5~47 I ~.- ~ t"3&' L Phone:(7~)3) 559-0908 [ "~a~m~m'~"~'-'~ · ~ 10av,d E. "~59 ~inn, Reg. ~o. ££4,4 File No. 12796 Book-Page 430/39 Scale 1 "=20' Engineering ° Planning · Surveying ~ Associates, Inc. September 8, 2005 Ms. Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound 2005 Street Improvements Partial Payment MFRA #15000 Dear Ms. Hanson: Enclosed is Buffalo Bituminous' Payment Request No. 4 for work completed through August 31, 2005 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $276,125.43. We have reviewed this request, find it in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. Sincerely, Robert Dehler, P.E. CC: Gino Businaro, Finance Director Carlton Moore, Public Works Director Enclosure sAmain:gdou 15000heorresVaansonpart-pay9-8 An Equal Opportunity Employer 14800 28th Avenue North, Suite 140 · Plymouth, Minnesota · 55447 - 2660- phone 763/476-6010 · fax 763/476-8532 · e-mai/: mfra@mfra.com -2661 - 8~88~~888 ~ 888888~8888 8 ~8888888888888~ 8 88 m 88888858988888 8 88888888888 8 8888888888~g88~ 8 88 -2662- -2663- RESOLUTION NO. 05- CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT FUNDING 3a'qD AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR TRANSIT DISTRICT PARKING DECK WI~EREAS the City of Mound is a participant in the Livable Communities Act's Housing Incentives Program for 2005 as determined by the Metropolitan Council, and is therefore eligible to apply for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds; and WHEREAS the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the Demonstration Account's purposes and criteria and is consistent with and promotes the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council's adopted metropolitan development guide; and Wl~EREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and WItEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and WHEREAS the City agrees to act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the grant application submitted on June 30, 2005; and WFIEREAS the City acknowledges Livable Communities Demonstration Account grants are intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples or prototypes for development or redevelopment projects elsewhere in the region, and therefore represents that the proposed project or key components of the proposed project can be replicated in other metropolitan-area communities; and WI~EREAS only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account during each funding cycle and the Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only to eligible projects that would not occur "but for" the availability of Demonstration Account grant funding. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City: Finds that it is in the best interests of the City's development goals and priorities for the proposed project to occur at this particular time. -2664- Finds that the project component(s) for which Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is sought: (a) Co) will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably foreseeable future; and will not occur within two years after a grant award unless Livable Communities Demonstration Account funding is made available for this project at this time. Authorizes its City Manager to submit on behalf of the City an application for Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds for the project component(s) identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary implement the project on behalf of the City. Adopted this __ day of ,2005. Mayor Clerk -2665- Metropolitan Council Building communities that work August 30, 2005 Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 Subject: 2005 Livable Communities Demonstration Account Application Resolution Dear Ms. Smith: The resolution submitted in support of Mound's 2005 Livable Communities Demonstration Account application is not acceptable because the 2004 format was used to prepare the resolution instead of the revised 2005 resolution format. Significant changes were made to the resolution for 2005 that require the applicant city to identify the need for LCDA funding in order for the project to proceed in the foreseeable future. To ensure that your application is consistent with the 2005 requirements, we ask that you submit to us a signed copy ora resolution using the revised format no later than September 22, 2005. It is important that we have the resolution by this date because the Liyable Communities Advisory Committee will conduct an evaluation session of the LCDA applications on September 23, 2005, at which time all applications must be complete, including the "but for" findings addressed in resolution of support. Since this situation has only recently come to our attention, we are allowing the extra time beyond the normal time frame to make your application complete. We must receive a revised resolution by September 22, or your application will be considered incomplete and will not be evaluated. Thank y ~'nterest in Livable Communities funding. Director, Housing & Livable Communities Enclosure cc: Kandis Hanson, City Manager, Mound \IL BRAR.\L~V Corem Move ro0er'~PETERSUN~2~0.v,0830(,5 vmith mo~ nd r.s.doc www.metrocouncfl.org Metro Info Line 602-1888 (651) 602-1000 * Fax 602-1550 · TTY 291-0904 230 East Flfth Street * St. Paul, Mtnnesota5510-9~ An Equ-- ~ .~ ~'~ ~'~ -~ Employer CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 05- A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCES FOR AN EIGHT (8) FOOT SIDE YARD FENCE AND WAIVING SWIMMING POOL FENCING REQUIREMENT FOR NEW HOME LOCATED AT 1605 BLUEBIRD LANE MOUND, MINNESOTA PID# 13-117-24-12-0227 PLANNING AND ZONING CASE NO. 05-53 WHEREAS, the applicant, Aqua Pool and Spa (on behalf of owner Tim Beliveau), has submitted a request for a two (2) foot height variance to allow installation ora eight (8) foot side yard fence to be constructed along a portion of the north property line; WHEREAS, the applicant is also requesting waiving of the swimming pool fencing requirements as set forth in City Code Chapter 350.645 as a specially designed swimming pool cover has been installed on the new pool; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 1605 Bluebird Lane; and WHEREAS, pursuant to City Code Chapter 350.475, side yard fences are permitted to be placed along property lines behind the front setback area as long as they do not exceed six (6) feet in height; and WHEREAS, the purpose for the fence is to provide privacy and to buffer noise associated with mechanical equipment associated with the new home and swimming pool; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 350:475 regulates fence height to no more than six (6) feet when located in a side yard; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 350.645 requires specific provisions for fences to be constructed around swimming pools; and -2667- WHEREAS, as required by the City Code, the variance application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 8, 2005 meeting who voted to recommend that the City Council deny the fence height variance and approve the swimming pool fence waiver variance (subject to conditions.) NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City does hereby approve the requested variances and makes the following findings of facts as outlined below: A. The fence installed on the property is (6) feet in height and includes 1-2 feet of decorative lattice. B. The purpose for the (8) foot fence is to buffer noise associated with mechanical equipment which is located on the north side of the house. C. If a swimming pool fence was installed, views for the "southern" property owner may be affected. D. Varied topography. 2. The variances are approved subject to the following conditions: A. The fence shall be placed on the property line and shall meet the provisions of City Code Chapter 350.475 for fences. Bo Any fence constructed within the (50) foot lakeshore setback area shall not exceed 3-feet and must maintain a see-through visibility level equal to that of chain-link type fence and shall be treated so as to blend with the natural surroundings of the setback area. C. The applicant shall be responsible for payment of all involved costs associated with the review of the land use application. 2. The variances are approved for the following legally described property: See Exhibit A The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: -2668- Adopted September 13, 2005 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2669- 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (959 472-3190 PUBLIC LANDS REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director (on behalf of Ray Hanson, Planning and Engineering Technician and Carlton Moore, Public Works Director) September 6, 2006 Randy Gabrelcik Richmond Right-of-Way (ROW) abutting property located at 4712 Richmond Road Construction of a temporary driveway REQUEST The applicant, Randy Gabrelcik, is requesting an Public Lands Permit to allow construction a temporary driveway in the Richmond Road right-of-way to serve a proposed garage on the property located at 4712 Richmond Road. The driveway is proposed as an interim measure pending construction of a public street extension to be constructed in the subject area in 2006 as part of the annual street reconstruction contract. The applicant has signed a Waiver and Consent Agreement regarding the construction and payment of involved fees which has been included as an attachment. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Refer to Certificate of Survey prepared by Survey Specialists dated June 10, 2005. CITY CODE 320 - PRIVATE STRUCTURES AND PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON PUBLIC LAND City Code 320.01 regulates private structures and private construction activities on public land in the City of Mound. Specifically, Subd. 1 regulates new construction activities on public lands. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to City departments for review and comment as appropriate. SITE INSPECTION -2670- Council members are encouraged to visit the subject site prior to the meeting. PHOTOGRAPHS Photos of the subject site have been included with the application materials. NOTIFICATION While City Code Section 320 does not require public notification, current City policy indicates that adjacent property owners are notified as a courtesy. Member of the Council are advised that a copy of the meeting agenda was mailed to adjacent property owners on or around September 9, 2005. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of the Public Lands Permit request from Randy Gabrelcik to allow construction of a temporary driveway in the Richmond Road ROW subject to the following conditions: 1. Any and/or all comments from the Council. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits including payment of fees. 3. All costs associated with the City's review of the Public Lands Permit application shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 4. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be maintained on site. 5. Submittal of an erosion control escrow deposit of $500.00. -2671 - CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 05- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY IN RICHMOND ROAD ROW FOR RANDY GABRELCIK AT 4712 RICHMOND PID: 19-117-23-32-0137 WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking a Public Lands Permit to allow excavation and construction activities in the Richmond Road right-of-way to install a temporary driveway to serve a garage at 4712 Richmond Road; and WHEREAS, the applicant has signed a Waiver and Consent Agreement associated with the improvement of Richmond Road in 2006 as part of the annual street project; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 320, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has recommended approval of the Public Lands Permit application subject to conditons; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this request at their September 13, 2006 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the Public Lands Permit as submitted by Gary Gabrelcik subject to the following condition(s): 1. Any and/or all comments from the Council. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all permits including payment of fees. 3. All costs associated with the City's review of the Public Lands Permit application shall be the responsibility of the applicant. 4. Appropriate erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be maintained on site. 5. Submittal of an erosion control escrow deposit of $500.00. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember by Councilmember and seconded -2672- The following voted in the affirmative: The following voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of September 2005. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2673- PUBLIC LANDS CITM OF MOUND 5341Maywood Road, Mound, MN 5364 APPLICATION Application Fe~: $200 (if ~)roject valuation is $1,000 or more) Date Recei Dock .Commission~Date City Council Date DISTRIBUTION Building Official DNR Pa rks Director MCWD c,e~ Public Works Other CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT- new construction. NOTE: NO PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOAT HOUSES OR OTHER BUILDINGS ON PUBLIC LAND (city Code Section 320, Subd. 1). PUBLIC LAND MAINTENANCE PERMIT to allow repairs to an existing structure (City Code Section 320, Subd, 3). CONTINUATION OF STRUCTURE - to allow an existing encroachment to remain in an "as is" condition (City Code Section 320, Subd. 3). LAND ALTERATION - change in shoreline, drainage, slope, trees, vegetation, fill, .etc. (City Code Section 320, Subd. 4). structure or work you are requesting is an activity on publicly owned lands, Structures like boat houses, patios, etc. are all NONCONFORMING USES. It is the intent of the City to bring all these uses into conformance, which means that those structures will at some time in the future have to be removed from the public lands. Ail permits are granted for a limited time and are non-transferable. Stairway construction must meet the State Building Code when the permit is for new construction, or a new permit is applied for due to a change in dock site holder. Please type or print legibly ABUTTING Address ~\~_ '~\0.~"',,¢~",,C~C,.,0~ ~C~ PROPER~ DESC. Subdivision· PID~~ ~~O i~ ~ Plat~ i ZONfNG DISTRICT R-I~ R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 Public Lands Permit Application Page 1 of 2 Revised 01/i6/03 -2674- PUBLIC Name LI-'~ \'")_ PROPER~ Dock Site ~ Shoreline Type CONT~CTOR Name ~C~ Address H Phone (H)~~72-~5 (W) (M)~ PROPOSED COST OF PROJECT (INCLUDING LABOR & MATERIALS)~_~ DESCRIBE REQUEST & PURPOSE · . Applicant's Signature Date Public Lands Permit Application Page 2 of 2 Revised 01/16/03 - 2675- -2676- -2677- WAIVER AND CONSENT AGREEMENT THE UNDERSIGNED, being the owners of that tmet and parcel of land legally described as follOws: Lots 28-31 Inclusive, Block 12, Wychwood Addition, Hennepin County, 1VIN in the City of Mound addressed as 4712 Richmond Road. represent and agree as follows: 1. They are the owners of the above described tract and parcel of land (the "Property"), and have the full authority to enter into this agreement. 2. They have requested that the City of Mound install the following public improvements to serve and benefit the Property: Extension of approximately 120 feet of Richmond Road to include curb & gutter, bituminous paving, and retaining walls as needed. 3. The Undersigned understands that Mound will specially assess the Property for the cost of the Improvement in accordance with established assessment policies; and that the cost to be assessed against the Property is expected to be $26~000.00. Once assessed, the assessment may be prepaid, or may be paid, with interest, in installments for 15 years. 4. The Undersigned agree for themselves, and their successors in interest to the Property that they will pay, when due, all installments of the assessment. 5. The Undersigned, for themselves and for their successors in interest to the Property hereby waive notice of hearing and hearing on such special assessments as may be otherwise required under Minn. Stat. Chapter 429; and waive any right to appeal such assessment hereunder. 6. The Undersigned hereby acknowledge that the market value of the Property will be increased by at least as much as the dollar amount contained in paragraph 3 above, and that the Property is benefited thereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands as of the -..~ay of STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y of , 2005 bY .f'~tm/~ ~ brdC'~d ..-, MU220-4 -2678- 1 25.0 m~gO ~:'~ 0 rtl 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: September 6, 2005 Re: Local Approval of Division - M.S.S. 272.162 As the Council may recall, a resolution was adopted in August 2004 to require local approval of property transfers and divisions pdor to conveyance by the County. Following adoption of the resolution, the document was sent to the County in accordance with M.S.S. 272.162, Subd. 3 however Staff has recently leamed the resolution(s) was not recorded. So as to clarify the intent of the City's action to require municipal approval of all property divisions within the boundaries of Mound, a "new" resolution has been prepared. As the Council may be aware, Hennepin County informally sends out a proposed division to the City for review and approval pdor to processing. However, the adoption of the attached resolution makes the process mandatory. Members of the City Council are advised that the City'sordinance does not regulate lot combination activities and the current resolution, as written, will not apply to property transfers which occur as a result of a sale. -2680- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION #05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES SECTION 272.162, SUBD. 3 TO REQUIRE LOCAL APPROVAL OF ALL LAND DIVISIONS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF MOUND PRIOR TO CONVEYANCE WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162, Subd. 3 allows a municipality to have the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162 apply to property within its boundaries by filing a certified copy of a resolution of its governing body with the auditor and recorder of the county in which it is located; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to make the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162 applicable to all property divisions within the boundaries of Mound as allowed by Minnesota Statute Section 272.162, Subd. 3. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Councilmember and seconded by The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted by the City Council this September 13, 2005 Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: City Clerk Bonnie Ritter -2681 - Minnesota Statutes 2004, 272.162 Page 1 of 2 Legislature Home I Links to the World I Help I A( House I Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions I Bill Search and Status I Statutes, Laws, and Rules Minnesota Statutes 2004, 272.162 Copyright 2004 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes 2004, Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 272 272.162 Restrictions on transfers of specific parts. Subdivision 1. Conditions restricting transfer. When a deed or other instrument conveying a parcel of land is presented to the county auditor for transfer or division under sections 272.12, 272.16, and 272.161, the auditor shall not transfer or divide the land or its net tax capacity in the official records and shall not certify the instrument as provided in section 272.12, if: (a) The land conveyed is less than a whole parcel of land as charged in the tax lists; (b) The part conveyed appears within the area of application of municipal subdivision regulations adopted and filed under section 462.36, subdivision 1; and (c) The part conveyed is part of or constitutes a subdivision as defined in section 462.352, subdivision 12. Subd. 2. Conditions allowing transfer. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision 1, the county auditor may transfer or divide the land and its net tax capacity and may certify the instrument if the instrument contains a certification by the clerk of the municipality: (a) that the municipality's subdivision regulations do not apply; (b) that the subdivision has been approved by the governing body of the municipality; or (c) that the restrictions on the division of taxes and filing and recording have been waived by resolution of the governing body of the municipality in the particular case because compliance would create an unnecessary hardship and failure to comply would not interfere with the purpose of the regulations. If any of the conditions for certification by the municipality as provided in this subdivision exist and the municipality does not certify that they exist within 24 hours after the instrument of conveyance has been presented to the clerk of the municipality, the provisions of subdivision 1 do not apply. http://www.revisor, leg.state.mn.us/bin/getpub.1- 2. 6.8 2 - ype=STAT_CHAP_SEC&year=curr... 9/6/2005 Minnesota Statutes 2004, 272.162 Page 2 of 2 If an unexecuted instrument is presented to the municipality and any of the conditions for certification by the municipality as provided in this subdivision exist, the unexecuted instrument must be certified by the clerk of the municipality. Subd. 3. Applicability of restrictions. This section does not apply to the exceptions set forth in section 272.12. This section aPplies only to land within municipalities which choose to be governed by its provisions. A municipality may choose to have this section apply to the property within its boundaries by filing a certified copy of a resolution of its governing body making that choice with the auditor and recorder of the county in which it is located. HIST: 1982 c 564 s 1; 1983 c 239 s 1,2; 1986 c 444; 1988 c 719 art 5 s 84; 1989 c 329 art 13 s 20 Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, visit the Contact Us page. General questions or comments. http ://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/getpub.i-2 6 83-:ype=STAT_CHAP_SEC&year=curr... 9/6/2005 CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and the City Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1. As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which the attached and forgoing extract was transcribed. 2. I have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. I find said extract to be a true, correct and complete transcript from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of.said City held on the date indicted in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: RESOLUTION NO. 04-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATE STATUTES SECTION 272.162, SUBD. 3 TO REQUIRE LOCAL APPROVAL OF LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY TRANSFERS PRIOR TO CONVEYANCE BY HENNEPIN COUNTY Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on the 27th day of July, 2004. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 31st day of August, 2005. Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2684- THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK -2685- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Street Vacation Request - Halstead Avenue (unimproved) APPLICANT: Larry Peterson PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 05-06 LOCATION: 6619 Bartlett Blvd. ZONING: Residential District R-1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential REQUEST The City Council will hold a public hearing to review a request from Larry Peterson who has submitted an application to vacate unimproved Halstead Lane which is located immediately south of his property located at 6619 Bartlett Boulevard. The unimproved ROW abuts PID No. 22-117-24-43-0029 which is a vacant tax-forfeit parcel that is held by Hennepin County. PROCEDURE Minnesota State Statutes Section 412.851 states that a statutory city may abandon ownership or control over all or any part of the land they have set aside, dedicated or used as streets or alleys and further states that a City Council may initiate the action by resolution or by the submission of a petition by a majority of the landowners and the owners of at least 50 percent of the land area. Procedurally, state statute requires that the City Council must hold a public hearing on the proposal following two weeks of published notice and posted notice. The City must also provide written notice to each affected owner at least (10) days before the public hearing. The notice of public hearing was published on July 30th, August 13th and August 20th, posted on July 26th and mailed to all affected property owners with (350) feet on September. 1st.Therefore, all publication, posting and mailing requirements have been satisfied. City policy also requires that anY proposed vacation request is reviewed by the Planning Commission, Parks and Open Space Advisory Commission and/or Docks and Commons Advisory Commission (as appropriate) prior to formal review by the City Council. -2686- VACATION ACTION When a city vacates a street, the involved portion of the public right-of-way is split 50-50, (presumably to the centerline) and is usually free of easements either in favor of the public or owners of other property abutting the street. However, state statute allows that a City may specify the extent to which a proposed vacation affects existing utility easements, including the right to maintain and continue existing utility easements. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment: City Engineer John Cameron See attached memorandum dated April 13, 2005. Public Works Director Moore The existing utilities within the road right of way need to remain public under public right of way or utility easements. Copies of the as-built document(s) have been included as attachment(s). It is premature to determine the City does not see any future public purpose for this right of way when the adjacent propertY is being considered for development. Vacating the road now might reduce the City's options for access and utility service without knowing the impacts of the future development. Parks Supt. Fackler Vacation request to be reviewed by POSAC due to open space of adjacent tax-forfeit parcel. Lake frontage of tax-forfeit parcel is included in City's shoreline count. 2 -2687- Consulting Planner Gordon (former) Fire Chief Pederson City Manager Hanson Police Chief Kurtz Building Official The ROW provides the opportunity for future access to the adjacent parcels that, if vacated, would be landlocked unless otherwise combined with parcels having street frontage. Fire Department will need appropriate access(es) in the event redevelopment occurs in subject area. Having the responsibility of oversight for redevelopment within the City of Mound, I strongly recommend that it would be premature to part with land that could further the grandest possible plan for the redevelopment of the Manufactured Home Park. This is a simple matter of public benefit. Not only will its redevelopment replace the blight and enhance the neighborhood, but a large redevelopment will add to the tax base significantly, therefore lessening the burden for other Mound residents. Additionally, as the Cities of Mound and Minnetrista consider a design of a large redevelopment project, multiple ingress and egress are of extreme importance. Preserving the right-of-way will not only enhance traffic flow through the subdivision, but it will also insure the public safety. No comments. No comments. -2688- PUBLIC AGENGY REVIEW DNR. Effective July 1, 2005, state statute requires that all vacation petitions that abut or affect public water must be forwarded to the' Department of Natural Resources by certified mail no less than (60) days before the scheduled public hearing. The previous statute required a (30) day formal review period for the DNR. Members of the Council are advised that the a certified copy of the application was sent to the DNR Area Hydrologist on July 27th, however, the DNR has indicated that the aforementioned provision(s) does not apply to the subject application. A copy of the email from Paul Purman of the DNR dated August 19t~' is attached. Hennepin County. A copy of the vacation application was mailed to Jeff Strand of Hennepin County Taxpayer Services on August 8, 2005 as the adjacent property is tax-forfeit. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Halstead Lane is a dedicated, unimproved public right-of-way and includes municipal utilities. 2. The City Engineer has prepared an aerial layout of the subject area which has been .included in the packet. In considering a vacation request, the City Council must make a finding that there is no public benefit to retaining ownership of this particular section of unimproved right-of-way. If the proposed vacation request is approved, any and/or all existing public and private utility easements would need be retained and/or reserved. Presently, there are municipal utilities in the subject area. Refer to comments from the City Engineer. 5. Vacation requests are not subject to the timeline provisions as set forth in M.S.S. 15.99. On March 22, 2005, the Mound City Manager was notified that the existing manufactured home park which is located west of the subject area is going to be converted to another use. Due to the potential for development in this area, may be premature to consider vacation of the unimproved road at this time from a long-range planning perspective. -2689- Staff spoke with Marilyn Bell of Hennepin County Taxpayer Services on April 26, 2005 who indicated that the adjacent tax forfeit parcel will not be offered for sale following receipt of the letter from the DNR and that release of the parcel would require special legislation. If the parcel would be released it would be offered to abutting owner(s). Currently, the owner(s) of 6619 Bartlett Boulevard dos not qualify as an "abutting owner" at its does not physically touch the fax-forfeit parcel. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff did not support the vacation request and recommended denial as there is no public benefit to releasing unimproved Halstead Avenue due to the following issues: There are existing municipal utilities in the ROW including watermain and sanitary sewer. The future development potential of the subject area is unknown. Due to the possible development of the adjacent manufactured home court, the release of the ROW at this time is premature. The lake frontage of the tax-forfeit parcel held by Hennepin County is counted in the City's shoreline count. The unimproved ROW abuts a tax-forfeit parcel which is held by Hennepin County. The release of the unimproved road was not supPorted by the DNR. o The possible extension of Halstead Avenue in the event development occurs in the subject area would provide improved emergency access in subject area. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION(S) Plannin[~ Commission. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at its April 18u' and June 6, 2005 meetings and voted to recommend approval of the vacation request subject to conditions. POSAC. The Parks and Open Space Advisory Commission reviewed the request at its June 14th meeting meeting and unanimously voted to recommend denial of the vacation request. DCAC. The Docks and Commons Advisory Commission reviewed the request at its July 21st meeting and voted to recommend that the vacation not be denied based on the impact of dock program. Copies of the meeting minute excerpts have been included. -2690- Members of the Council are advised that a resolution has not been prepared in advance of the City Council public hearing due to conflicting recommendation(s) from Staff and the Commissions. -2691 - MEMORANDUM DATE: April 13, 2005 TO: FROM: Ms. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director City of Mound John Cameron, City Engineer SUBJECT: Halstead Avenue Street Vacation Case No.: 05-06 MFRA//15261 As requested, we have reviewed the request for vacation of the section of Halstead Avenue between Blocks 1 and 2 of Halstead View and have the following comments and recommendations: Back~round This section of right-of-way for Halstead Avenue was dedicated when the plat of Halstead View was created. It was intended for the future extension of the improved section of Halstead Avenue to serve the properties adjacent to Lake Minnetonka. There are five (5) lots, combined into two (2) separate parcels lying between the improved portion of Halstead Avenue and the dedicated right-of-way in question. One parcel is under the same ownership as the Trailer Court on County Road 110 and the other parcel is owned by the Hasses. Utilities City sanitary sewer and watermain are located within this platted right-of-way, both of which extend for another 185 feet across three more properties to the east, before they dead end. These utilities also extend Westerly to the improved portion of Halstead Avenue and northerly to County Road 110. Except for this section of dedicated right-of-way, these utilities are located within permanent easements. -2692- -26- Ms. Sarah Smith April 14, 2005 Page 2 Con clusion In analyzing the potential future need of this platted right-of-way for street purposes, it is our opinion that it would not be in the Public's best interest to vacate the unimpro'ded street. There is some vacm~t property, both east and west of the subject right-of-way that could need street access if it is ever developed. If the city should decide to vacate this right-of-way, permanent easements would need to be retained for the sanitary sewer and watermain. s:\main :Wlou 15216~corres~smith4-12 -27- -2693- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION June 6, 2005 BOARD OF APPEALS CASE 05-06 Street Vacation - Unimproved Halstead Avenue 66t9 Bartlett Blvd - Larry Peterson Smith reviewed the case, which was continued from the April 18, 2005 meeting. Larry Peterson (6619 Bartlett Blvd) Said the road will never be built any further west than his property. The road goes nowhere. Why hold on to it? Ayaz thought the challenge is because of the value of the lakeshore. Osmek indicated there was concern over the trailer park. What if Hasse sold his property and the developer decided to get involved it may play a part in the development of the trailer court. That is a long shot. It makes more sense to have a property that conforms with the rest of the neighborhood. It makes sense to vacate Halstead Avenue in its entirety. Mueller joined us at 7:29. Smith indicated staff's position is that this action is premature. Once you give it away you can never get it back. Mueller restated that the road goes nowhere. There's no purpose in keeping it. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Glister, to recommend vacation of the subject property. MOTION carried. Voting for: Mueller, Schwingler, Glister, Osmek, Ayaz, Miller. Voting against: Michael. Hasse abstaining. -2694- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 18, 2005 CASE 05-06 STREET VACATION - UNIMPROVED HALSTEAD AVENUE 6619 BARTLE~BOUEEVARD LARRY PETERSON CDD Smith presented the case and street vacation process which is governed by state statute. The applicant'Larry Peterson .is requesting to vacate a portion of HalStead Avenue that is an unimproved roadway. Smith indicated that the application was routed to all city departments, DNR, MCWD, LMCD. City Staff. indicates the presence of public utilities in Halstead Avenue. The adjacent property to the south is DNR tax forfeit land. The DNR has recommended no sale of the'tax forfeit parcel.and has also recommended the City. not vacate the dg hr-of-waY. Adjacent land in Mound and Minnetdsta.may be developed and,. until additional' information is known, it is be premature to vacate. The DNR tax forfeit land is counted in the City's shoreline lineal footage. Commissioner Mueller asked the public benefit of a roadway that is landlocked. VVhy should a piece of right-of-way that has no access be a public, benefit when utility easements cover the area needed for access. Discussion ensued about the tax forfeit parcel. Miller asked about the value impact on the adjacent trailer park potential redevelopment if the right-of-way staysin place. Miller agreed With Staff's point about waiting unffithere is further knowledge about,the trailer park property. Mueller asked Hasse if he had been approved for redevelopment. Hasse stated he was approximate!y 5 years ago. Conversation among the COmmissioners ensued about the benefits of the vacation and potential future release of the tax 'forfeit parcel. Ayaz asked M'ueller ~if {he trailer park was up for. redevelopment would he change has. option, Mueller stated it would'. Ayaz asked if all the options were considered for the tax forfeit property are exhausted-, and not .given to the public, then it should go to the abutting owner. osmek pointed out that all other lakeshore parcels with a Bartlett address have contiguous lots straight from Bartlett to the. lake. Michael stated that ali Staff has recommended it .not be vacated. -2695- Planning CommiSSion Minutes April 18, 2005 Larry Peterson .addreSsed the Commission.' He stated his intent'for the request was for the potential to acquire the DNR tax forfeit parcel but realiZed' hecan~t,~bec~use'he in not technically an abutting owner. The property owner to the west w0Qrld~b~' tl~ 6nly home that would be desirable. Miller pointed out that the vacation could be requested in adifferent manner, than proposed such as j'bSt the eastern portion to allow, the applicant to be considered an abutter to the. DNR parcel. Peterson stated that many assumptions are' being made; that the DNR would sell and who might purchase. CDD stated that DNR is reluctant to sell the ta~( forfeit pamel and have the road vacated.' Ayaz asked Peterson how would he feel if the vacation was split east/west to allow Peterson to be.considered an abutting, owner to the DNR tax forfeit parcel. Peterson stated what, ever approach alloWed him to be considered as an abutter. Peterson stated he wants consideration of the request just as any owner or developer would in 'the City of Mound. MOTION by Miller, seconded by AYaz, to table until more DNR information can obtained or a revised application submitted. MOTION carded. Voting for:. Miller, Ayaz, Michael and Glister: Voting against:. Osmek and Mueller. Abstaining: Hasse. Smith noted that contact with DNR will be made to understand the sale information comment as no additional information was provided to the City. -2696- EXCERPTS FROM PARK AND OPF, N SPACE ADVISORY COMMISSION Fadder stmed to the commissioners that it is importm~ for them to look at th~ Halstead ~ v~on from the p~ks persPe~ve. Fackl~ stated that the property contains open spa~. Fa~kl~ then asked the board if they had ~me to ~-~,iew the case along with what ~t~ th~ ~ with thc proPC~. Thc probity involved B~isc replied that this is possible IXoperty that the City of Mouncl could usc for docks ,~ well es open specc is currently under DNR control. Mason wanted to know ifthe~ wes shoreline access on thc Applicant Larr~ l'elerson notified the board of the.sketch, te=~g his pwpcrty and stated that he is the owner of lots i, 3, and 4 and has been a resident of Mound for 2~ years. Peterson feels that the street that he he feels that he is the best candidate for the land and would like to have the oppommity to bu~ i~. l'~on sa~ that it will not affect th~ feet mo~e of land. Peierson stated that the city would receive more Facklcr wanted to know if there was a process that Mr. Pemson was currently involved with t~puxiin~ ~he lak~ho~e. Peterson stated that that there was a process. Beise commented that the DNR w~s not ' Beise's concern is the utilities on the parcel of land that the city would make. Beise would not ~ to see the land leave the city, s hands because it is located next to a tax fodeiied parcel and has utilities going thro~ il~ Beise commented that the majority of the city's employees have looked at ~ and have recommended deni-I for the request cxc~X for ~ Planning Commi~on but recorded in the minutes that future development could possibly sway their decision- MOTION by Beise to deny the vacation SECOND by Turner. U.,~__nimous. Motion carded would be an issue. Be/se commented that the future developmenl of the city could be a factor. -2697- Pilling asked what the parks perspective is on the land. Fackler agrees with Beise when he said that he would like to see the city retain the Beise suggested that Peterson come back in another year and try to vacate the road again. Mason asked if there was a line that could be crossed where Peterson would no longer be able to make an application for vacation and Beise stated that he in fact could in another 6 months. MOTION by Mason to extend the meeting until 9:30 SECOND by Beise. Motion carded. It was unanimous that Mr. Peterson would have viable notification and that the parks commission is not against the proposal to vacate but needs to see more information. -2698- EXCERPTS FROM DOCgS AND COMMONS ,ADvisoRY COMMISSION MINUTES ?:30 pm at Mound City Hall Thursday J, uiv 21, 200~ Discuss CASE 0S-06 Street Vacation-Unimproved Halstead Avenue 6619 Bartlett Blvd.- Applicant:. Bruce Johnson Fackler summarized the case to the commissioners and reminded them to take a look at it only from the docks perspective. Discussion took place as to how the vacation of the property Would affect the shoreline attars. The applicant, Larry Peterson was concerned that if the property was to come up for sale he'would not have the opportunity to purchase it. Fackler stated that because he is not the abutting property owner, he will not have the chance to purchase the property. The discussion then centered on the possible development of the property by the City of Mound. Fackler stated that once the property is gone there is no bringi, fng it back. Ahrens wanted to know where the road ends as of fight now and FaClder stated that it does in fact end at lot 1. Ahrens also asked if the tax.forfeited land is property 29 and Fackler stated that it was. Ahrens asked what the property is being used for currently. Fackler stated that not all spaces in the dock program are used for dock space. Ahrens asked if the property is being held by Hennepin County. Fackler as well as other stated that the property is owned by the DNR but the county is controlling it. The DNR does not want to give up the property as of right now. Discussion continued around the subject of what would happen if the mad was vacated. Ahrens asked why the Planning Commission supported the street vacation. Faclder stated that he was not at the meeting. Fackler then stated that he was only at the Parks meeting and they looked at the staff's recommendations and the majority wanted to retain it. The discussion continued around the shoreline and who would be eligible to buy the property. Larry Peterson of 6619 Bartlett owns three lots directly north of the road. Peterson has lived there for 28 years. Peterson said that a previous owner had tried doing the same thing that is being done now but was unable to do so. Peterson is aware of the new developments of the trailer court and never had done -2699- contacted 8emtor Jm Olson and she didn't know why the DNR was holding land, ai~ observing the land herself. OL-on was the one to tell Pein'son to go to the council and get it vacated. Peterson stai~ tlmt the two people that are able to bid on the property will not because they already have lakeshore. Funk asked if only the adjacent ownel's would be able to buy it and Faclder was ~m.~re as to what would happen. The discussion then centered around where the road would go and if there is aneed for the land before they sell it. MOTION by Funk that the DCAC l~ommend that the vacation not be denim based on the impact of docks program. All in Favor:. Funk Eurich Opposed: Specht Olson Ahrem -2700- PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE # 05-06 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF HALSTED AVENUE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, will meet on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 at 7:30 PM to hold a public hearing to consider a request from Larry Peterson for vacation of a portion of unimproved Halsted Avenue which abuts his property located at 6619 Bartlett Boulevard. The area(s) to be vacated is legally described as follows: The Northwest Half of Halsted Avenue, HALSTED VIEW, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (to be attached to Lot 4, Block 1, said HALSTED VIEW.) The Southeast Half of Halsted Avenue, HALSTED VIEW, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (to be attached To Lot 1, Block 2, said HALSTED VIEW.) Said Halsted Avenue, HALSTED VIEW to become a drainage and utility easement Jill Noflander, Planning and Inspections Secretary Copies of the plans are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Posted: July 26, 2005 Published in the Laker on July 30, 2005, August 13, 2005 and August 20, 2005 -2701 - I', 220.8 225.51 , i · I 289. 88 co ~ ~! 262 .~ 354.25 ',,~ 4~8.52 ~2.8 167.65 NOR~ ~o NORTH177'3' 272.44 ~ 35.6 611 ~ ,, 41.8 ~ ~0. ~ NO~04'~ 636.27~ '~ ~85 606. 64 ' C ~80.5 , 4~7. 76 ~ ~~ ~24 %,, ', 'h ~ 453.86 Page 2 of 2 4/14/2005 -2703- Page 1 of 3 Sarah Smith From: To: Sent: SubJect: "Paul Purman" <paul.purman@dnr.state.mn.us> <SamhSmith@cityofmound.com> Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:21 PM Re: City of Mound notice of road vacations,StratfordRoad,Halsted Avenue Sarah. Thanks for your patience. I spoke with Kathy Lewis and with staff from Trails and Waterways about Stratford and Halstead. The ~k, consensus here is that you are correct that they do not abut public waters. In regard to these two parcels please disregard my earlier request for you to notice the commissioner's office at least 60 days prior to the public meeting. Let me know if you have questions or concerns. Regards, Paul Best regards, Paul Pm'man Lands and Minerals Regional Specialist Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lands and Minerals Division 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 651.772.7942 (phone) 651.772.7977 (fax) 612.390.0918 (cell) >>> "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith~cityofrnoun.d.com> 08/29/05 10:09 AM >>> Hi Paul. Thanks for your message. I did review the new law change with our City Attorney and we believe that the two vacations on Stratford and Halstead Lane may not be subject to the DNR 60-day review/certified mail provision. I also advised the two applicants regarding the new law change. Be advised that I had the opportunity to visit with Kathy .Smith last Thursday and asked that DNR evaluate the two requests. She was very helpful and I believe she was going to review the case(s) with you. I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards. ..... Original Message ..... From: "Paul Purman" <paul.purman('~dnr. state.mn.us> To: <S arahSmith~cityofmound.com> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:05 AM Subject: Re: City of Mound notice of road vacations, StratfordRoad,Halsted Avenue Thanks, Sarah and again, apologies for the inconvenience. Paul Purman >>> "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith~cityofmound.com> 08/22/05 8:45 AM >>> Hi Paul. Thanks for your voicemail and email from last Friday. Staffwill -2704- 9/6/2005 :.~ CITY OF MOUND ,, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 Fax 952-472-0620 VACATION APPLICATION Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. City Council Date Please type or print clearly Phone (Home) ~ ¥~a~-%'~i(d (Work) q~,~'o~, -~'~.,~.-.~(J~ ~ (Cell) ~/~ Adja~nt Address ,~0 ADJACENT PROPER~ Name ~ Business (APPLICANTS LoL Block, PROPER~ SubdNision .... PI~ ~ I~ ZONING DISTRICT Cite: R-1 R-lA R-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 VACATED / - - R~SON FOR IS THERE A PUBLIC ~0. Tk ~ S ~¢ ~ ~ n ~ .~o ,~cc:~ ~ .~ ~ ~J NEED ~C J ~ L ~ FOR THIS ~ND? I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true an.j;) acc~,~ate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am~r~/,¥pon,~le for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this appJJ~'tion.// Print Applicant s Name Ai~lic~s Sionature Da{e ' Vacation Information (10/25/2004) Page 4 of 4 ' -2705- Hermepin County Map Server Page 1 of 2 Hennepin unty, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax info LEVEL Last update: 3/03/2005 at 1:00 PM READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Property ID 22-117-2443~028 Property Address ADDRESS UNASSIGNED MOUND, MN 0 Approximate Property Perimeter 482 ~. Market Value $ 40,000 Approximate Property A~'ea 13,172 sq.ft. = 0.302 acres Total Tax (2005) $ 182.38 Click on, Property htformation Button belo~v to view m,ain tax information page for the property you have selected The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612) 348-2618 or via e-mail at Bob. MoulderC,,co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Intemet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation. http://www~9~c~hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrim`?~7~-~me.=Hennepin&Crnd=Z~M~UT... 3/28/2005 Hennepin County Map Server Page 1 of 2 Hennepin nty, MN Click on map to view information on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & tax :info Property ID 22-117-2443~029 Property Address ADDRESS UNASSIGNED Last update: 4/5/2005 at 9:00 AM READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Approximate Property Perimeter 556 ft. Plarket Value $ $ .oo MOUND, MN 0 Click on Prope~y Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected Approximate Property Area 12,427 sq.ff. = 0.285 acres Total Tax (2005) The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612) 348-2618 or via e-mail at Bob. Mouldert'~.co.hennepin.mn.us The quality of the display may be influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 800x600 screen resolution. This application requires Internet Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation. http ://www 19.co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrim2?~7_0y.l. me=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALU... 4/14/2005 Property Information Search by Property ID Result page Page 2 of 2 Building Market Machinery Market Total Market: Land Limited Building Limited Total Limited: Qualifying Improvements Classifications: Property Type Homestead Status Relative Homestead Agricultural Exempt Status VACANT LAND LAKESHORE NON- HOMESTEAD EXEMPT There are no prior year taxes due on this property. 57313 Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service. Tax related questions: taxinfo@co.hennepin.mn.us Need help locating a property on our site? Check out our Search Tips Home J Your County Government J Licenses, Certificates, & Registration Employment & Volunteering J Health, Housinq, & Social Services J Law, I Safety, & Courts J Environment, Property, & Transportation Copyright © 2004 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepin.us Accessibility Policy I Contact Hennepin County I Security/Privacy Statem http ://www2.co.hennepin.mnlus/pins/pidresult.~'_2~7 0 8 - 4/14/2005 CER TFICA TE OF SUR V£ Y FOR I ARR Y PE TERSON 0 GO ?20 OENOTES: Lots 1, ,~ and 4, Block l, Hoisted Avenue, a~d Lot I, Block 2, H4LSTED VIEW, according to the recorded plo! thereof, Nennepin Count)/. Minnesota, to Lot ~. Slack :1. said NALE~EO Vl~.)~ ~. the' re~orded ~of t~reof Hennepin~nty. Mfnne~ , : ' ~e" lO Lot l, ~lock 2, sold HALJTED Vl~.) ~,, " Soi~ Hoisted Avenue. HALEY~D VI~ to bec~ ~ drolno9e on~ u~lity AREAS: LOTS t, .~. AND 4. BLOCK I =-~9,951.89 SO. FT. NALSYED AVEI~fJ£ = 5.854.26 ~. FT, LOT t, 8L~ 2 = 12.361 SO. FT. ~E ~ LESS TOTAL ~EA = 58. 147 SO. FT. ONLY EASEWENtS ON RECORD PLAT ARE S~ ON THIS SURVEY UNLESS ADDITIONAL DOCLWENTATION OF OTHER EASEMENTS OF RECCRD ARE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY~ AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD IF ANY, t HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY PLAN OR REPORT BY ME OR UIVOET? ~IY DIRECT SUPERVISION ~ T~T I ~ ~$T 25.00 EAST ~ / D£TA/L "- REv. .' ~- 14-05 AZ ,~.o: ao, ~ -2710- ] ,~,,,,,,, ~,, '62 -2711 HALSTED EXISTING GROUND ~.* . . ~i EXISTING GROUND Y'°'..°r"~, ¥ , 9~! 950 · ': 970 990~ I · 950 970!' ................................... ' .......... 5 4 5 6 0 I ~- 2 .............................................. , ........ .... 2712- 0 -2713- P.02/03 Minnesota Depar uent of Natural Resources Division o~ lands and M;ne~J~ Central I~egiOn 1200 Wam~' Road Ap~ 5, 2005 A~)0 HeanepLu County Paul, Mifttteeola 55106 RECEIVED TAXPAYER SIERVICE~ HENNEPIN COUNTY Re: HemtCl~_U County Tax No,cie review xequ~st DNR F~= ~'/0507 Thank you far your ]ctte~ advisi~ the DNR oftwo tax-for/eft pan~,b proposed f~ snle. DNR staffhavc ~c~dewed your submission and here t~e following comments. P_ARCIR~ THAT _REO~ ~_APPROVAL ~ Lp_~$ TtIAN 150 OR LR$_S~FR~ONTAG~=.Q~ NOT APPRO¥-~(-O - Pa~.3# 27-llT-24-24-00{Y2(Minmb, ista) 'The DNR ]Division of Trails end Wa~rways note~ tba~ this parcel conte/ns 30 feet of ]ak~bore on Lake M;--etonka with dircct access ft~n ICmg's Paint Road to Held'mi Bay. This parcel also h~ n~tural ~.somcc value as undeveloped shoreUnc and natural l~dreslmre. Pre~in~ thc shoreline in its nantred stere ~atects ~he aquatic plant eonnnamty, which is csscmtial/~r fistt lmb~tat. ICx_~ing.litis parcel public ownership will also allow for various forms of pubUc access to Haldsted Bay ~a the £a~:m of wnzk down access, canoe access, and snownmbile access. There is also potent~nl for a ~.~hing ~c~. Frol~ a mk'tLr~/'r.50~.~C p~rspcctive, it is sot in dm pubUc'$ best interest ii'this parcel were ~o leave public ownership. Parcel g 22-! 17-24-43-0029 (Mound) The DN]R ]Div~%ioll of Ttat~ s. ud Waterways n~ ~ ~ p~c~ c~;~ ~ ~t ~ ~t of l~b~ ~ ~bim~ ~ ~ E ~ ~y ~b~ ~d ~ ~ ~ ~1, ~c ~velopcd s~ ~c~ · ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~~ who ~ ~ ~m o~c~. U~ ~s ~, ~e ~ of ~ e~blc ~ b~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~bl~ ~o~e; ~, ~v~g ~ p~l ~m ~bUc o~p w~d ~ ~ ~'~ ~ a~l~le. O~ ~e ~t w~d ~t ~e ~bUe ~ ~ep ~e p~l ~ ~b~c ow~p w~d be ~ ~ ~b~c ~k ~s~. F~ n ~ ~ ~ve, it is nm ~ ~e Thank you esr your patience in this nmtter. Please proceed with your sale as noted above, if you have any questiom co~zlg tl~ 1,a~m, please contact ffic at 651-772-7978. -2714- APR-12-L:~E)5 09:25 P.03/03 TJais co~och~les thc DN~'-e xevicw of Hennel~n Cou2~ty Legisl&eive Salo No. 270507. ~ you have any questions ~onc~rning this~etter, please contact n~ at (6~1) 296-9559. I look forward to work~§ with you on SinecreJy, An Equal Op;otllJnily Emi~oyer Who V~'uee- Diver~I, TOTRL P. 03 -2715- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: September 6, 2005 SUBJECT: Street Vacation Request - Portion of Stratford Lane (unimproved) APPLICANT: Bruce Johnson PLANNING CASE NUMBER: 05-27 LOCATION: 4458 Denbigh Road ZONING: Residential District R-lA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential SUMMARY The City Council will hold a public hearing to review a street vacation application to vacate an portion of unimproved Stratford Avenue which abuts his property located at 4458 Denbigh Road. BACKGROUND As the City Council may recall, Bruce Johnson was one of the three property owners who requested release of a former tax forfeit shoreline parcel abutting the properties located at 4446 Denbigh Road (Hanus), 4452 Denbigh road (Cook) and 4458 Denbigh Road (Johnson) which was authorized by the City of Mound in 2003 and subsequently sold by Hennepin County to Mark Hanus with the intent that the parcel would be resplit and combined with the abutting properties. Members of the Commission are advised that activity was approved by the City Council on April 12, 2005 and has been recorded at Hennepin County. An updated survey which depicts the proposed new lot configurations and legal descriptions has been provided by the applicant and is included as an attachment. The portion of unimproved Stratford Lane which is proposed to be vacated fronts the "former tax forfeit parcel" on the north side and the 4458 Denbigh Road property which is · owned by the applicants. -2716- PROCEDURE Minnesota State Statutes Section 412.851 states that a statutory city may abandon ownership or control over all or any part of the land they have set aside, dedicated or used as streets or alleys and further states that a City Council may initiate the action by resolution or by the submission of a petition by a majority of the landowners and the owners of at least 50 percent of the land area. Procedurally, state statute requires that the City Council must hold a public hearing on the proposal following two weeks of published notice and posted notice. The City must also provide Written notice to each affected owner at least (10) days before the public hearing. The notice of public hearing was published on July 30t~, August 13th. and August 20th, posted on ~luly 26th and mailed to all affected property owners with (350) feet on September 1st. Therefore, all publication, posting and mailing requirements have been satisfied. City policy also requires that any proposed vacation request is reviewed by the Planning Commission, Parks and 'Open Space Advisory Commission and/or Docks and Commons Advisory Commission (as appropriate) prior to formal review by the City Council. VACATION ACTION When a city vacates a street, the involved portion of the public right-of-way is split 50-50, (presumably to the centerline) and is usually free of easements either in favor of the public or owners of other property abutting the street. However, state statute allows that a City may specify the extent to which a proposed vacation affects existing utility easements, including the right to maintain and continue existing utility easements. CITY DEPARTMENT REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment: City Engineer Bob Dehler No comments Public Works Director Moore No comments Parks Supt. Fackler No comments Fire Chief Pederson No comments received. Police Chief Kurtz Building Official No comments. No comments. -2717- Public Works Supt. Skinner No comments. PUBLIC AGENGY REVIEW DNR. Effective July 1, 2005, state statute requires that all vacation petitions that abut or affect public water must be forwarded to the Department of Natural Resources by certified mail no less than (60) days before the scheduled public hearing. The previous statute required a (30) day formal review period for the DNR. Members of the Council are advised that the a certified copy of the application was sent to the DNR Area Hydrologist on July 27th however, the DNR has indicated that the aforementioned provision(s) does not apply to the subject application. A copy of the email from Paul Purman of the DNR dated August 19th is attached. LMCD and MCWD. Members of the Council are also advised that a copy of the application was forwarded to the LMCD and MCWD. No comments were received. UTILITY COMPANY REVIEW Copies of the request and all supporting materials were forwarded to all involved utility companies for review and comment. Excel Energy has indicated that they have no utilities within the proposed vacation area and also that they have no objections to the vacation. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Stratford Road was vacated previously in the subject area with the exception of the portion which is proposed to be vacated. In considering a vacation request, the City Council must make a finding that there is no public benefit to retaining ownership of this particular section of unimproved right-of-way. If the proposed vacation request is approved, any and/or all existing public and private utility easements would need be retained and/or reserved. There are no municipal utilities in the subject area. 4. Vacation requests are not subject to the timeline provisions as set forth in M.S.S. 15.99. 5. The subject area is approximately 250 SF. -2718- STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff supports the vacation request and recommends approval as there appears to be no public benefit to retaining the unimproved portion of ROW subject to the following conditions: 1. In the event there are existing municipal utilities in the ROW, easements shall be preserved. 2. Payment of all involved costs associated with the request. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION(S) Plannin[ Commission. The Planning Commission reviewed the request at its June 20"' meeting unanimously voted to recommend approval of the vacation request as recommended by Staff. POSAC. The Parks and Open Space Advisory Commission reviewed the request at its July 21st meeting and unanimously voted to recommend approval of the vacation request as recommended by Staff. -2719- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION # 05- A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF UNIMPROVED STRATFORD AVENUE ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4458 DENBIGH ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 05-05-27 WHEREAS, the applicant, Bruce Johnson, has submitted an application to vacate a portion of Stratford Avenue public right-of-way legally described on the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the subject area is unimproved and unmaintained is not serving as a public access in the subject area; and WHEREAS, there are currently no public utilities located in the right-of-way; and WHEREAS, there are no known private utilities located in the public right-of-way; and WHEREAS, when the City vacates a street and/or right of way, the involved portion of the public right-of-way is split 50-50 and is attached to the abutting properties; and WHEREAS, the City can specify the extent to which a street and/or pubhc right-of-way affects easements including the right to maintain and continue existing utility easements; and WHEREAS, the vacation request was reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 20, 2005 who unanimously voted to recommend vacation as there was no public benefit of retaining the involved portion of the portion of Stratford Avenue right-of-way as requested there are currently no municipal utilities in the subject area nor is it being used as a public access; and WHEREAS, the vacation request was reviewed by the Parks and Open Space Commission on July 21, 2005 who unanimously voted to recommend vacation; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 412.851, the City Council of Mound held a public heating on the vacation request on September 13, 2005 and provided proper notice thereof pursuant to state law. -2720, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: The City does hereby approve the public street right-of-way vacation request subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicants shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the vacation request. 2. Any and/or public and/or private easements shall be retained and/or reserved in the area proposed to be vacated. This vacation request is approved for that portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the following described property included on Exhibit A. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember seconded by Councilmember and The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Adopted September 13, 2005 Pat Meisel, Mayor Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk -2721 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE # 05-27 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF STRATFORD ROAD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Mound, will meet on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 at 7:30 PM to hold a public hearing to consider a request from Brace Johnson for vacation of a portion of unimproved Stratford Road which abuts his property located at 4458 Denbigh Road. The area(s) to be vacated is legally described as follows: That part of Stratford Road lying between the northerly extension of the east and west lines of the east 10.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Avalon. Jill Norlander, Planning and Inspections Secretary Copies of the plans are available to the public upon request at City Hall. All persons appearing at said hearing with reference to the above will be given the opportunity to be heard at this meeting. Posted: July 26, 2005 Published in the Laker on July 30, 2005, August 13, 2005 and August 20, 2005 -2722- 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 Fax 952-472-0620 VACATION APPLICATION Application Fee' and Escrow Deposit required at time of application Planning Commission Date Case No. ~ City Council Date Please APPLICANT Name. E-Mall Address Adja~nt Address ADJACENT PROPER~ Name of Business (APPUCANTS Lot PROPER~ ' ' Su~Nislon ZONING DISTRICT ~lr~e: R-1 TO BE VACATED R~SON ~ ~0~ FOR ,, REQUEST , IS THERE A ~'PUBLIC ~0. NEED FOR THIS ~ND? certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City reJated to thee processing of th~pplicati~n. ~ ----') Print Applicant's Name 'Apphc~'nt'~ S~gna~t~ - Date Print Applicafit's Name Applicant's g~tu~e' Da~/ ('I Vacation Information (10/25/2004) Page 4 of 4 -2723- EXCERPTS ,FROM MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY ,P,,LANNING COMMISSION JUNE 20~ 2005 CASE #05-27 VACATION UNIMPROVED PORTION OF STRATFORD ROAD 4458 DENBIGH ROAD - APPLICANT: BRUCE JOHNSON Smith reviewed the details of the case. Osmek commented that the side setback is eliminated if unimproved Stratford is vacated. Mueller asked about the deck constructed close to the lake. MOTION by Osmek, seconded by Miller, to recommend Council approve the variance subject to Staff conditions and with an added finding that the side setback becomes conforming. Mueller asked that the motion be amended to request City Attorney clarification of when the Planning Commission and Council can ask for additional items. Staff suggested that Mueller's proposal might be better handled as a Staff Directive. Osmek commented that he felt Staff's suggestion would work best. Mueller clarified the motion to vacate 250 SF of Stratford Road. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Mueller, seconded by Osmek, to request staff information by Attorney. MOTION carried unanimously. -2724- EXCERPTS FROM COMMONS An~R¥,CO,M~SS~ON ~S, 7~0 ~'~ .t, Mona City n~, Thursday Jul~ 21, 2~005 ' 1, Discuss: CAS,,E 05-27 Street ,Vacation- 4458 Denbigh Rd, Bruce Johnson · " Fackler explained to the commission of the vacation request. Beise stated that no one has denied the vacation. MOTION for approval of vacation by Beise SECOND: Turner. Motion Cra'tied. Fa~kler asked the owner why he made the request. Bruce Johnson stated that he owns three sides of the property and when they vacated the property in question part of his house was on the lot. The vacation of the proposed road was unanimous. -2725- Page 1 of 3 Sarah Smith From: To: Sent: Subject: "Paul Purman" <paul.purman@dnr.state.mn.us> <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:21 PM Re: City of Mound notice of road vacations,StratfordRoad,Halsted Avenue Sarah. Thanks for your patience. lI spoke with Kathy Lewis and with staff from Trails and Waterways about Stratford and Halstead. The ~ consensus here is that you are correct that they do not abut public waters. In regard to these two parcels,lily"- please disregard my earlier request for you to notice the commissioner's office at least 60 days prior to the public meeting. Let me know if you have questions or concerns. Regards, Paul Best regards, Paul Purman Lands and Minerals Regional Specialist Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lands and Minerals Division 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106 651.772.7942 (phone) 651.772.7977 (fax) 612.390.0918 (cell) >>> "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith@ci _tyofmound.com> 08/29/05 10:09 AM >>> Hi Paul. Thanks for your message. I did review the new law change width our City Attorney and we believe that the two vacations on Stratford and Halstead Lane may not be subject to the DNR 60-day review/certified mail provision. I also advised the two applicants regarding the new law change. Be advised that I had the oppommity to visit with Kathy Smith last Thursday and asked that DNR evaluate the two requests. She was very helpful and I believe she was going to review the case(s) with you. I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards. ..... Original Message ..... From: "Paul Purman" <paul.purman@dnr. state.mn.us> To: <SarahSmith~cityofmound.com> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 8:05 AM Subject: Re: City of Mound notice of road vacations, StratfordRoad,Halsted Avenue Thanks, Sarah and again, apologies for the inconvenience. Paul Purman >>> "Sarah Smith" <SarahSmith~cityofmound.com> 08/22/05 8:45 AM >>> Hi Paul. Thanks for your voicemail and email from last Friday. Staff will - 2726- 9/6/2005 Property Information Search by Street Address Result page Page 1 of 2 Search By: HOUSE or BUILDING #: 4458 STREET NAME: (at least first 3 characters) UNIT # (if applicable) records per page Hennepin County, Property Information Search The Hennepin County Property Tax web data daily (Monday - Friday) at approximately 9: Parcel Data for Taxes Payable Property ID: Address: Municipality: School Dist: Watershed: Sewer Dist: Owner Name: Taxpayer Name & Address: Click Here for the 2005 State Copy to be used when filing for ~ 19-117-23-24-0106 4458 DENBIGH RD MOUND 277 ConstrL 3 Approx. I BRUCE F & SHARON L JOHNSON BRUCE F & SHARON L 3OHNSON 4458 DENBIGH RD MOUND MN 55364 Most Current Sales Tnforma Sales prices are rePorted as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value arms-length transactions. NO SALE INFORMATION ON FILE FOR THIS PROPERTY. Tax Parcel Description Addition Name: Lot: Block: Metes & Bounds: Abstract or Torrens: AVALON THE ELY 10.00 FT OF LOT 4 AND THAI PART OF LOT 3 BLK 1 AVALON WHICH WLY OF A LINE DRAWN SLY FROM TH[ INTERSECTION OF THE NLY EXT OF Ti Note: This is a Partial Metes & Bom To receive full tax parcel descriptio taxdescription@co.hennepin.mn.us Call (612) 348-3070 to determine if At Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Values Established by Assessor as of Estimated Market Value: Limited Market Value: Taxable Market Value: Total Improvement Amount: Total Net Tax: Total Special Assessments: Solid Waste Fee: $283,000 $247,000 $242,800 $2,755.94 $38.72 http ://www2.co.hennepin.mn.us/pins/addrresul'.-~? 2 7 - 6/15/2005 Hermepin County Map Server Page 1 of 2 Hennepin County, MN Click on. map to view informatio:n on adjoining properties Scroll down to see property address, value & mx. info ZODN LEVEL Last update: 6/6/2005 at 1:00 PM READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Division In Process. !!!CAUTIONH! Requested parcel that is geographically displayed (Boundary lines highlighted) may not be the actual parcel boundary Property ID 19-117-23-24-0106 Property Address 4458 DENBIGH RD MOUND, MN 0 dueto DivisionIn Process! Approximate Property Perimeter 547 ff. Market Value Approximate Property Area 8,991 sq.ft. = 0.206 acres Total Tax (2005) $ $ .00 Click on Property Information Button below to view main tax information page for the property you have selected · ,, . ~,at<_~.· The data contained on this page is derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can only be disclosed by an accurate survey performed by a licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. The information on this page should be used for reference purposes only. Hennepin County does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any misuse or misrepresentation of this information or its derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to Bob Moulder (Hennepin County Survey Division) at (612) 348-2618 or via e-mail at Bob. Moulder@co.hennepin.mn.us http://www 19.co.hennepin.mn.us/scripts/esrim-?7~§Lrne=Hennepin&cmd=Find&VALU... 6/15/2005 Default Page 1 of 2 Recenter on click (~) Yes t._...' No Hennepin County Property Map Last update: 8/11/2005 at 3:30 PM - READ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER INFORMATION BELOW Click for detailed information on this parcel Property ID Approximate Property Perimeter Approximate Property Area 19-117-23-24-0106 547 ft. 8,991 sq.ft. = 0.21 acres Property Address Market Value Total Tax (2005) 4458 DENBIGH RD MOUND, MN 55364 $283,000 $2,794.66 Give us your feedba( Hennepin County Su How to use Map For quicker respon., information on surr, 'Recenter on click'. Show: (~) Aerial Photos Off (~) 2004* Aerials On [] City Names [] Street Names [] Address Number [] Lot Dimensions *Mpls. aedals south of Fran from 2003 The data contained on this page are derived from a compilation of records and maps and may contain discrepancies that can onl licensed land surveyor. The perimeter and area (square footage and acres) are approximates and may contain discrepancies. Th purposes only. Hennepin Counb/does not guarantee the accuracy of material herein contained and is not responsible for any mi: derivatives. Please report any map discrepancies to the Hennepin County Survey Division via e-mail at Surveyor. Maps@co.hennepil The quality of the display may be Influenced by your screen size and resolution setting and is best viewed at 1024x768 or highe~ Explorer 3.02 or Netscape 2.01 or later version for proper operation. .ome I~our County Government I Licenses, Certificates, & Registration I Emp.oyment & VolunteerinqI .eaIth, Housing, & Social Services I Law, Public Safety, & Courts I Environment, Property, & Transportation Copyright (D 2005 Hennepin County, Minnesota I www. Hennepinius c arceh 2729 fault as xgPID 1911723240106 http://wwwl3.co.hennepin.mn.us/publi p '2__o_. __- . p . = 8/25/2005 DEMARS- GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. Phone 763-559-0908 Fax763-559-0479 3030 HARBOR LANE NO., SUITE 111 " PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 May5,2005 PROPOSED STRATFORD ROAD VACATION DESCRIPTION That part of Stratford Road lying between the northerly extension of the east and west lines of the east 10.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, AVALON. -2730- LAKE (~uc~ rtm~) Ice Elevotion=~925.B 12-27-2005 $ 82'41'53" W $ 8£°41 '53" W 49,87 PROPOSED VACATION OF "*~L SRTATFORD ROAD "?" That port of Stratford Road lying between the northerly extension of the east end west lines of the ~ east 10.00 feet of Lot 4, I, AVALON. MINNETONKA Proposed Stratford Road O-Denotes iron monument ~4452 9.0 PARCEL C EXISTING HARDCOVER PARCEL A ~4458 Denbigh Road, Mound Mn. House/Garage 1,488 Sq.ii. Deck 556 Sq.ii. Drfve/Wolk/Potio 2,546 Sq. Ft. Total Hardcover 4,$90 Sq. Ft. Lot Area 6,479 Sq,ii. ~ of Hordcover 51.$~ EXISTING HARDCOVER PARCEL B ~4452 Denblgh Rood, Mound Mn. House/Garage 1,480 Sq.l l. Deck 420 Sq. ii. Drive/Walk/Patio 1.000 Sq.ii. Total Hordcover 2,900 Sq.ii. Lot Area 8,269 Sq.ii. · of Nardcover 35.1~ EXISTING HARDCOVER PARCEL C ~4446 Denbi~h Rood, Mound Mn, House/Garage 1,876 Sq. Ft. Deck 411 5q. Ft. Drive/Walk/Patio 962 Sq. Ft. Total Hardcover 3,249 Sq. Ft. Lot Are~ 8.815 Sq.ii, · Of Hordcover 36.9~ PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPUONS PARCEL A The east 10.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, AVALON, and that port of Lot $, ~old Block I, and Stratford Rood, now vacated, according to the recorded plot thereof, which lies wes~erty of o line drawn southeHy fram the intereectlon of the northerly extension of the easterly line of said Lot 3, and the northerly line of vacated Stratford Rood, to o point on the souther/y llne of sold Lot $, distant 10,00 feet westm'ly of the southeast corner of said Lot $, as moooured along said southerly line, and easterly of the northerly extension of the west line of the east 10.00 feet of said Lot 4. oleo That part of Lot 29, Block 24, SE'I'ON, lying between the northerly extensions, to the shoreline of Lake Minnetonko, the east llne of Lot 3, and west llne of the east 10.00 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, AVALON. PARCEL B Lot 2, Block 1, AVALON, according to the recorded pl~t thereof, and that part of Lot $, said Block t, and Stratford Rood, now vacated, which lies easterly of o line drown ~outhetfy from the intereection of the northerly extension of the easterly line of said Lot 3, and the northerly line of vacated Stratford Rood, to o point on the southerly llne of said Lot 5, distant 10.00 feet westerly of the southeast comer of sold Lot $, as measured along said southerly line. and westedy of the northerly extension of the east llne of said Lot 2. also That port of Lot 2g, Block 24. SE'TON. lying between the northerly extension of the east and west lines of Lot 2, Block l, AVALON. PARCEL C Lot I . Block I, AVALON, according to the recorded plat thereof, also That port of Stratford Road, now vacated, and Lot 29, Block 24, SETON. lying between the northerly extension of the east and west lines of Lot 1, Block I, AVALON. *This Survey is subject to any facts disclosed by full and accurate T~Us Search DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYOREJ, INC. 30.7,0 Harbor Lane No. lomnOUth,MN 55447 e:~?~3) 559-0908 Fax :(763) 559-0479 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I ~m a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the Laws of the State of Minnesota. David E. Crook Oato: /''~'~°~ Minn. Reg. No. 22414 ,L2731 - File No. 12722 B Book-Page 430-14 Scale 1 "=50' CERTIFICATE OF SURVb., FOR Jack Cook 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith Date: September 8, 2005 Re: Sign Permit Application - Waiver of Fee(s) Reqeust SUMMARY. The Westonka Historical Society and Chamber of Commerce have submitted a sign application to install a new sign on the building located at 2323 and 2325 Commerce Boulevard and are requesting waiver of fee(s) by the City Council. Presently, there is a temporary banner located on the east side of the building and it is Staff's understanding that they plan to replace the banner with a permanent sign of similar design/size/placement. DISCUSSION. · Sign permit(s) do not require City Council action unless variance(s) are needed. · Wall signs are allowed in the B-1 District as long as they do not exceed (15) percent of total wall size to the maximum or 175 SF. Single signs are not to exceed (100) SF, Roof signs are permitted if they are an integral part of the architecture of a building. Such signs shall not extend more than (5) feet above the roof line of a building or exceed 75 SF in area. Roof signs are limited to one face, parallel to the front of the building. · Applicant is advised that a separate building and/or electrical permit may be required per State Building Code. Building permits fees are determined based on valuation. · The current fee for sign permits is $100.00. -2732- -2733- -2734- 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 Fax 952-472-0620 SIGN ,PERMIT APPLICATION SITE Property Address :33'23 33 ,5 zone Business Name ~.~. ~. ~_. i .......... Phone Home Phone ~ ~-q¢?~ . Other c'~ll OWNER .Name Pa u ~' 5o/ b~ ~ ' ' . SIGN ComPany Name ~'5~ ~ I'$ ~ ~ ' CONT~CTOR Contact Person ~0 ~ ~ / NUMBER OF SIGNS APPLYING FOR: Side 2) SIZE OF SIGN REQUESTED: ~ (if more than one wall sign is being requested, see feet high x ~.~ feet wide'[] /_./z~ square feet (dates) feet SEASONAL SIGN tobe in place from __1 1__ to I I FREE STANDING SIGN height from ground level to top of sign WALL SIGN: Wall area [] feet high x feet wide = square feet Number of existing wall signs: List square footage of each existing sign: Total square feet of all existing Wall sig~is: square feet Percentage of wall area covered by signs: square feet DESCRIBE SIGN (mes~sage, materials, illumination, etc.): APPLICANT'S q-.b DATE (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY & DATE PLANS CHECKED BY APPROVED BY & DATE COPIED APPROVED ZONING -2735- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group is to remove all litter and traSh and provide .a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY Date of Use /k] Area to be Used Time Frame 13 Intended Use Expected Attendance Telephone No. Home?/~_52 ,4/.~_,- :K'_,~c'~O Work: Drivers License -2736- .-27~-? CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 05- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2006 PRELIMINARY GENERAL FUND BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,792,440; SETTING THE PRELIMINARY LEVY AT $4,256,204; AND APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY OVERALL BUDGET FOR 2006. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following preliminary 2006 General Fund Budget appropriations: City Council Promotions Cable TV City ManagedClerk Elections/Registration Assessing Finance Computer Legal Police Emergency Preparedness Planning/Inspections Street City Hall Bldg. & Srvs. Parks Cemetery Recreation Contingencies Transfers 82 450 5 250 45 000 309 610 20 600 86 350 299 270 13 950 163 440 1,492,710 7,550 434,480 911,470 122,720 484,530 10,170 0 30,000 272,890 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 47792,440 -2738- Resolution No. 05-.~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the County Auditor to levy the following preliminary taxes for collection in 2006: SPECIAL LEVIES HRA Lease Revenue Bonds- Lease Payment Bonded Indebtedness- 2001A Judgment Bond G.O. Improvement 2001C G.O. Improvement 2003A G.O. Tax Increment 2003C G.O. Tax Increment 2004A G.O. Equip. Certificates 2004C G.O. Improvement 2005A G.O. Equip. Certificates 2005C G.O. Equip. Certificates 2006 Lease Equipment Loan Unfunded Accrued Liability of Public Pension Funds 364. O6O 21 400 75 000 139 067 141 494 30 600 114 500 66 700 31 000 35 000 3 420 67,890 Total Special Levies 1,090,131 PRELIMINARY REVENUE LEVY 3,166,074 Preliminary Certified Levy 4~256..205 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the preliminary overall budget for 2006 as follows: GENERAL FUND As per above 4,792,440 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Area Fire Service Fund Dock Fund TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 791,430 168,390 959,820 -2739- Resolution No. 05-_._ ENTERPRISE FUNDS Recycling Fund Liquor Fund Water Fund Sewer Fund Storm Water Utility Fund TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 166,080 575,770 844,780 1,344,930 128,330 3,059,890 SUMMARY General Fund Special Revenue Funds Enterprise Funds 4,792,440 959,82O 3,059,890 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 8;812..150 Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of September, 2005. Mayor Pat Meisel Attest: Bonne Ritter, City Clerk -2740- DRAFT Press Release Date: Contact: Sept 14, 2005 Kandis Hanson, City Manager Gino Businaro, Finance Dir 472-0609 472-0608 On Tuesday, September 13, 2005, the Mound City Council approved the City Proposed Tax Levy and the Preliminary Budget for Year 2006. Due to its growing tax base, Mound residents will feel minimal impacts. "Property value increases, general construction activity and the effects redevelopment will significantly offset the 16.50% levy increase, impacting home and commercial property owners by a meager .77% increase to the City tax," reported City Manager Kandis Hanson. "The budget includes many city funds reflecting the cost of oPerating the respective departments," explains Finance Director Gino Businaro. The property tax levy provides fiscal resources for general purposes and for payment of principal and interest on General Obligation Bonds issued in the past. However, the primary focus should be directed to the General Fund levy and budget. The General Fund budget primarily accounts for police, fire, street, building inspections, and park services and the general purpose levy is the resource that pays for those services. Approved General Fund expenditures will increase by 9.31%. General Fund revenues will increase by 9.16%, basically reflecting a wash. The fund balance for 2006 continues to hover around 20%. The fund balance is the cash on hand to pay bills prior to the receipt of taxes, which are collected by the State of Minnesota. Mayor Pat Meisel expressed her pleasure with the preliminary budget stating, "Fortunately for Mound, property value increases and new properties added to the tax roll help to keep the taxpayers' burden at a very reasonable level and make it possible to provide for the growing demand for city services during this time of transition." -2741 - CITY OF MOUND TAX LEVY RECAP 2OO3 TAX LEVIES * REVENUE - GENERAL PURPOSES 2,373,760 REVENUE - LEASE PAYMENTS 381,830 2001A JUDGMENT BOND 22,560 FIRE RELIEF 33,350 G.O. IMPROVEMENT 2001C 2,600 G.O. IMPROVEMENT 2003A 0 G.O. TAX INCREMENT 2003C 0 G.O. IMPROVEMENT 2004A 0 G.O. EQUIP. CERTIFICATES 2004C 0 G.O. IMPROVEMENT 2005A 0 G.O. EQUIP. CERTIFICATES 2005C 0 G.O. EQUIP. CERTIFICATES 2006 0 LEASE EQUIPMENT LOAN 0 2004 2,528,050 389,140 22,200 33,350 5,700 116,440 139,830 0 65,460 0 0 0 21.790 2OO5 2,7i7,660 368,440 21,800 33,350 71,200 136,860 143,340 28,500 142,450 0 35,000 0 14.320 PROPOSED 2O06 3,166,074 364,060 21,400 67,890 75,000 139,067 141,494 30,600 114,500 66,700 31,000 35,000 3.420 TOTAL LEVY 2.814.100 3,321.960 3.712.920 4.256.204 14.63% SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT) 83.000 116.506 136.124 153.720 12.93% NOTE: THE TRUTH IN TAXATION LEVY NOTICE WILL COMPARE THE 2005 AND 2006 LEVY AMOUNTS AFTER STATE PAID CREDITS. 2004 2005 2006 TOTAL LEVY 3,321,960 3,712,920 4,256,204 CERTIFIED LEVY 3,321,960 3,712,920 4,256,204 FISCAL DISPARITY ~259.600) {278.460~ ¢285.0703' NET LEVY 3.062.360 $,434,460 3.971.134 14.63% 15.63% CITY PROPERTY TAX RATE 38.467 37.295 37.583 0.77% V/ Tax Tax Tax Property Value 150,000 577.01 559.43 563.75 Property Value 200,000 769.34 745.90 751.67 Property Value 250,000 961.68 932.38 939.58 Property Value 300,000 1,154.01 1,118.85 1,127.50 08/31/2005 -2742- GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITUREs REVENUE GENERALPROPERTYTAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE LICENSES NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS GENERAL GOVT. CHARGES OTHER REVENUE INTERFUNDTRANSFER~BONDS TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES 2003 2004 2005 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROVED 2OO6 REQUESTED 2006 2,173,053 2,294,529 2,407,210 2,842,770 2,842,770 18.09% 520,537 380,357 375,630 342,060 342,060 -8.94% 13,595 21,645 20,950 19,550 19,550 -6.68% 285,300 483,000 310,500 310,500 350,785 278,237 365,050 290,294 481,179 470,700 277,215 338,870 287,700 11.633 493,716 281,000 285,300 483,000 310,500 310.500 3.637.112 4.288.533 4.208,240 4,593,680 4.593,680 -21.85% 2.61% 7.92% 10.50% 9.16% CITY COUNCIL 79,603 74,466 78,850 85,950 82,450 4.57% PROMOTIONS 3,750 3,750 3,750 7,500 5,250 40.00% CABLE T.V. 43,429 41,976 45,000 45,000 45,000 0.00% CITY MANAGER/CLERK 253,300 275,725 291,290 309,610 309,610 6.29% ELECTIONS & REGISTRATION 326 12,135 1,250 55,600 20,600 69.76% ASSESSING 83,269 78,759 83,300 86,350 86,350 3.66% FINANCE 215,797 225,064 247,440 327,960 299,270 20.95% COMPUTER 25,955 24,584 21,430 29,450 13,950 -34.90% LEGAL 157,496 141,743 160,420 163,440 163,440 1.88% POLICE 1,243,138 1,452,018 1,378,530 1,606,650 1,492,710 8.28% EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 3,406 6,851 7,100 7,550 7,550 6.34% PLANNING & INSPECTION 312,538 304,558 341,930 455,180 434,480 27.07% STREET 601,317 1,020,902 884,150 974,470 911,470 3.09% CITY HALL BLDG & SRVS 181,178 128,260 115,660, 174,120 122,720 6.10% PARKS 264,670 445,955 385,590 754,890 484,530 25.66% CEMETERY 8,376 9,210 9,880 10,170 10,170 2.94% RECREATION 0 0 3,000 63,900: 0 -100.00% CONTINGENCIES 15,662 14,501 54,720 30,000 30,000 -45.18% TRANSFERS 253.735 415.768 271.080 282.260 272,890 0.67% TOTAL EXPENDITURES INCREASE (DECREASE) FUND BALANCE, JANUARY 1 ADJUSTMENT TO AUDIT FUND BALANCE, DECEMBER 31 FUND BALANCE AS A PERCENTAGE OF EXPENDITURES: 3.746.945 4.676.225 4.384.370 5.470,050 4,792,440 9.31% (109,833) (387,692) (176,130) (876,370) (198,760) 12.85% 1,533,173 1,422,542 1,056,430 1,164,760 1,164,760 10.25% ~798) 306.039 1.422.542 1.340.889 880,300 288.390 966,000 9.74% 37.97% 28.67% 20.08% 5.27% 20.16% V/ NOTE: UNDESIGNATED ONLY IS PART OF FUND BALANCE. 08/31/2005 -2743- GENERAL FUND REVENUE GENERAL GOVT. CHARGES 42000 34103 41000 34105 41000 34107 42000 34114 42000 3421O 42000 34230 48100 37290 48100 38051 48100 38055 48100 38060~ 48100 38070 49300 45000 42000 42000 45000 42000 41000 41000 48400 48500 ZONING CHARGES SALES OF MAPS, ETC. ASSESSMENT SEARCHES PLANNING COMM. APPL. DOG PICK-UP CHARGES MISC, SERVICE CHARGES RENTAL PROPERTIES FEE STREET LIGHT FEE FRANCHISE FEE - CABLE T.V. ANTENNA LEASE CENTER POINT FRANCHISE FEE XCEL ENERGY FRANCHISE FEE GENERAL GOVT. CHARGES OTHER REVENUE 34108 34110 34191 342O3 34940 35100 36100 36200 36210 39101 ADMIN SUPPORT & OVERHEAD DEPOT RENTAL SURCHARGES ACCIDENT REPORTS CEMETERY SALE OF LOTS COURT FINES NEW ASSESSMENTS MISCELLANEOUS INTEREST SALE OF PROP. & EQUIPMENT OTHER REVENUE 2003 ACTUAl, 19 467 585 11,005 2,419 23 0 76,933 91,976 67,140 21,652 18.075 290.294 117,496 4,507 1,179 1,905 0 105,140 2,342 22,173 14,659 7,814 277.215 2004 ACTUAL 2 542 600 10,935 1,925 6 0 105,673 93,451 71,032 89,435 107,579 481.179 138,892 4,094 511 1,815 4,225 110,122 2,189 27,931 18,017 31.074 338.870 2005 APPROVED 50 700 400 10,000 2,500 50 0 105,000 92,000 70,000 90,000 100.000 470.700 138,600 4,500 500 2,000 3,500 100,000 100 20,000 15,000 3.500 287.700 2O06 0 600 40O 10,000 2,000 0 0 106,000 95,000 74,000 90,000 105.0oo 483.000 140,000 4,500 50O 2,000 4,000 110,000 1,000 25,OOO 20,000 3.500 310.500 -100,00% -14;29% 0.00% 0.00% -20.00% -100.00% 0.95% 3.26% 5.71% 0.00% 5.00% 2.61% 1.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 14.29% 10.00% 900.00% 25.00% 33.33% 0.00% 7.92% 49300 49300 4700O 39203 39210 39310 TRANS. FROM OTHER FUNDS INTERFUND TRANSFERS PROCEED FROM SALE OF BONDS TOTAL TRANSFERS/BONDS TOTAL REVENUE 0 11,633 11.633 3.637.112 0 10,583 483.133 493.716 4,288,533 0 11,000 270.000 281.000 4.208.240 0 10,500 300.000 310.5oo 4.593.680 -4.55% 11.11% 10.50% 9.16% BREAKDOWN BY P~RgENTAGE GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE LICENSES NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS GENERAL GOVERNMENT CHARGES OTHER REVENUE TRANSFERS TOTAL 59.75% 14.31% 0.37% 9.64% 7.98% 7.62% 0.32% 100.00% 53.50% 8.87% 0.50% 6.49% 11.22% 7.90% 11.51% 100.00% 57.20% 8.93% 0.50% 8.67% 11.19% 6.84% 6.68% 100.00% 61.88% 7.45% 0.43% 6.21% 10.51% 6.76% 6.76% 100.00% 4.68% -1.48% -0.07% -2.46% -0.67% -0.08% 0.08% 0.00% 08/31/2005 -2744- GENERAL FUND REVENUE 48000 48OO0 48000 48000 48000 42000 48200 48200 48200 48200 43000 42000 48200 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 42000 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES 31O10 31020 31O4O 31910 35200 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES DELINQ. AD VALOREM TAXES FISCAL DISPARITY PENALTIES & INTEREST FORFEIT TAX SALE APPORT. TAXES INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 33100 33160 33401 33402 33415 33418 33421 33425 FEDERAL GRANT - POLICE GRANTS FROM OTHER GOVT. UNIT LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID MKT VALUE HOMESTEAD CR OTHER STATE GRANTS STATE AID FOR STREETS POLICE PENSION AID PERA STATE AID INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE LICENSE___~S 32010 32020 32030 32040 32050 32072 32175 32180 32190 LIQUOR LICENSES BEER LICENSES GARBAGE LICENSES ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES CIGAREq-FE LICENSES PUBLIC GATHERING P. FIREWORKS LICENSES MISC. BUSINESS LICENSES MISC. BUSINESS PERMITS LICENSES NON-BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITR 32210 32215 32230 32235 32236 32238 32241 32270 32290 34104 34310 BUILDING PERMITS FIRE PERMITS PLUMBING PERMITS HEATING PERMITS PUBLIC LAND PERMITS PLUMBING REGISTRATION DOG/CAT LICENSES GRADING/EXCAVATING MISC. P&I FEES PLAN CHECK FEES CONTAINERS ON RIGHT OF WAY NON-BUS. LIC. & PERMITS 2003 ACTUAL 1,897,347 31,705 229,374 9,826 4,801 2.173.053 54,200 0 92,954 213,700 7,151 83,486 62,986 6,060 520.537 9,875 2OO 9OO 210 0 0 3OO 1,300 810 13.595 192,824 2,622 26,442 12,985 200 0 1,305 9,368 4,100 100,889 350.785 2004 ACTUAL 2,001,969 28,668 257,885 6,007 2.294.529 56,150 0 0 219,698 0 35,742 62,707 6.060 380.357 14,200 75 900 225 0 300 200 3,000 2.745 21.645 162,805 144 14,034 9,486 0 0 5,942 7,140 0 78,536 278,237 2005 APPROVED 2,083,750 35,000 278,460 5,000 5,000 2.407.210 20,000 0 0 219,570 0 60,000 70,000 6,060 375,630 14,000 5OO 9OO 25O 0 0 3OO 3,000 2.000 20,950 220,000 2,000 25,000 1~000 0 0 1,500 3,000 3,500 100,000 365.050 2006 PROPOSED 2,507,770 40,000 280,000 10,000 5.000 2.842,770 0 0 0 220,000 o 46,000 70,000 6,060 342,060 12,100 100 900 2OO 0 900 3OO 2,550 2.500 19.550 170,000 2OO 15,000 10,000 0 0 6,000 4,OO0 0 80,000 285,300 20.35% 14.29% 0.55% 100.00% 0.00% 18.09% -100.00% 0.20% -23.33% 0.00% 0.00% -8.94% -13.57% -80.00% 0.00% -20.00% ERR ERR 0.00% -15.00% 25.00% -6.68% -22.73% -90.00% ~;0.00% 0.00% 300.00% 33.33% -100.00% -20.00% 100.00% -21.85% 08/31/2005 -2745- 2006 PROPOSED CAPITAL OUTLAY -ALL FUNDS DEPARTMENT FUND ITEM DEPARTMENT PROPOSED REQUEST AMOUNT Elections General Finance General Police General Planning/Inspection General Streets General City Hall Bldg. & Srvs. General Parks General Dept. Request POSAC Request HAVA Required Voting Equipment PHn~r Squad Car - 2006 Crown Victoria Camera Systems for Squad Cars Radar Unit Datalux In-Squad Computers Copy Machine GIS Software Two Sidewalk Snow Blowers GIS Software Sanders, Boxes, Lites, Hoists for Snow Plow Trucks City Entrance Signs Tables, Chairs - Council Chambers Office Suite Furniture Boat, Motor, Trailer Mechanic Tools and Chest Mower 128" 3 Deck 4Wheel Drive 4X4 Pick up 112 Ton 3 Play Structure 20 Picnic Tables Park Plan From Park Dedication Fees? Park Signage Dog Bag Dispensors 35,000 1,000 6o~ooo 11,890 2,050 13,500 15,000 500 130,000 50O 125,000 28,000 23,400 20,000 1,630 2,625 50,575 21,000 141~000 10,000 30,000 46,00O 2,100 30,000 5,950~ 0 13,500 0 0 130,000 0 62,500 0 0 20,000 1,630 2,625 50,575 0 49,450 0 192,500 20,000 54,830 Recreation POSAC Request ' Skate Park Improvement From Park Dedication Fees ? TOTAL GENERAL FUND 10.000 780.770 316.780 0 316,780 08/31/2005 -2746- 2006 PROPOSED CAPITAL OUTLAY - ALL FUNDS pEPARTMENT FUND ITEM DEPARTMENT PROPOSED REQUEST AMOUNT Fire Area Fire Service One Portable Fire Pump w/Tank Two MSA Breathing Unite w/Masks One Extraction Blower Fan One .Lap Top Computer TOTAL AREAFIRESERVICEFUND 9,800 0 8,200 8,200 1,480 1,480 1,200 1.200 20.680 10.880. 10,880 10.880 Liquor store Liquor Fund Cardboard Compactor TOTAL LIQUOR FUND o o o Water Water Fund TOTALWATER FUND One Ton w/Plow and Utility Box Copier Meter Register Programmer Tandem Dump Truck GIS Software 70,000 1,000 0 0 5OO 71.500 0 1,000 0 0 O 1,000 1,000 1,o00 Sewer Sewer Fund Upgrade B-3 and C-3 Lift Station Include SCADA System Copier GIS Software Two Generators TOTAL SEWER FUND 150,000 1,000 500 30.000 181,500 150,000 1,000 0 30,000 181.000 181,000 181.000 Docks Dock Fund TOTAL DOCK FUND Boat, Motor, Trailer Mechanic Tools and Chest Mower 128" 3 Deck 4Wheel Drive 4X4 Pick up 112 Ton Deck Replacement Rip Rap Dredge 11,370 375 7,225 3,000 2,000 30,000 5,000 58,970 11,370 375 7,225 0 2,000 30,000 5,000 55~970 55,970 55.970 08/31/2005 -2747- 2006 PROPOSED CAPITAL OUTLAY- ALL FUNDS CAPITAL OUTLAY SUMMARY GENERAL FUND AREA FIRE SERVICE FUND LIQUOR STORE FUND WATER FUND SEWER FUND DOCK FUND TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY DEPARTMENT REQUEST 780,770 20,680 0 71,500 181,500 58.970 1,113,420 PROPOSED AMOUNT 316,780 10,880 0 1,000 181,000 55,970 565.630 08/31/2005 -2748- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 05- RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEVY NOT TO EXCEED $153,720 FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE COST OF OPERATION, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF MSA 469, OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF AND FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE YEAR 2006 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the governing body of the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a resolution from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound, entitled "Resolution Approving the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority Budget for the Year 2006 pursuant to MSA Chapter 469"; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, must by resolution consent to the proposed tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that a special tax be levied upon real and personal property within the City of Mound in the amount not to exceed $153,720. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said levy, not to exceed $153,720 is approved by this Council to be used for the operation of the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, and shall be certified as a tax levy to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before September 15, 2005. Adopted by the City Council this 13th day of September, 2005. Attest: Bonnie Ritter, City Clerk Mayor Pat Meisel -2749- CITY OF MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www, cityofmound.com MEMO Date: To: From: Re: September 8, 2005 Mayor Meisel and City Council Members Council Personnel Committee Proposed Administrative Code Amendments Attached please find a list of proposed changes to the City of Mound Administrative Code as agreed upon by the City Council Personnel Committee and the Staff Administrative Code Committee, for your consideration and action. Section 29.4 of the Administrative Code, as adopted by the Council on 1/11/05, calls for the City Manager to meet with the employee group to discuss possible amendments at least every two years. During the last few months the Staff Administrative Code Committee and the Council Personnel Committee met for that purpose. Proposed amendments were submitted by both groups and we have reached consensus on a number of changes as shown in the attached document. It is the opinion and the recommendation of the Council Personnel Committee that the changes be approved as agreed upon by the two groups. Please call us if you need additional information on this matter. CC: Staff Admin Code Committee Mayor Pat Meisel Council Member Bob Brown City Manager Kandis Hanson Finance Director Gino Businaro _printed on recycled paper 2750- ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA Adopted 7/10/84 - Resolution #84-105 Amendment Adopted 12/11/84 - Section 29.3 - Res. #84-203 Amendments Adopted 5/21/87 - Section 5 Comp-Time Section 7 Standby Pay Section 14.3 Insurance Section 30.3 Compliance ~ Res. #87-96 Amendments Adopted 4/5/88 - Section 5.1 & 5.2 Comp-Time Res. #88-57 Amendments Adopted 11/10/92 - Section 2.1 Compensation Plan Section 14.1 & 14.5 Insurance Section 17.3 Sick Leave Section 18.8 Severance Pay Res. #92-14 Amendments Adopted 10/10/00 - Res. #00-93 Amendments Adopted 01/22/02 - Res. #02-18 Section 14.1 Insurance Section 14.5 Long Term Disability Amendments Approved 7/20/04 - Health Care Savings Plan Amendment Approved 1/11/05 - Health Care Savings Plan LATEST REVISION ADOPTED 1111/05 -2751 - SECTION 1 SECTION 2 SECTION 3 SECTION 4 SECTION 5 SECTION 6 SECTION 7 SECTION 8 SECTION 9 SECTION 10 SECTION 11 SECTION 12 SECTION 13 SECTION 14 SECTION 14A SECTION 15 SECTION 16 SECTION 17 SECTION 18 SECTION 19 SECTION 20 SECTION 21 SECTION 22 SECTION 23 SECTION 24 SECTION 24A SECTION 25 SECTION 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS COMPENSATION PLAN WORK SCHEDULES OVERTIME PAY COMP TIME CALL BACK STANDBY PAY COURT PAY EDUCATION INCENTIVE MILEAGE, MEALS & LODGING REIMBURSEMENTS DISCIPLINE PROBATIONARY PERIODS SAFETY INSURANCE HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN HOLIDAYS VACATION SCHEDULE SICK LEAVE SEVERANCE PAY FUNERAL LEAVE EYE EXAMINATION INJURY LEAVE MILITARY LEAVE J U RY LEAVE LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT PAGE 4 5 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 10 13 13 14 15 15 15 16 16 16 16 17 COMPENSATION FOR TIME NOT WORKED 19 LEGAL DEFENSE 19 -2752- SECTION 27 SECTION 28 SECTION 29 SECTION 30 RESIGNATION MISCELLANEOUS RELEASE OF NEWS INFORMATION DISPOSAL OF CITY PROPERTY CLOTHING COMPLIANCE TO THIS ADMIN. CODE CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATIVE PREROGATIVE POSITIONS COVERED EMPLOYEE RIGHTS 20 20 20 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 EXHIBIT A - SECTION 26 - LEGAL DEFENSE 22 -2753- ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 1 - PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS 1.1 The City of Mound, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 412.651, is authorized to adopt an Administrative Code incorporating the details of administrative procedures. It shall be the purpose of these rules and regulations to insure uniform and equitable personnel policies and administration for all employees of the City of Mound; except this Administrative Code shall not apply to any recognized bargaining unit covered by a labor agreement unless specifically stated by the individual barqainin,q unit contract as to which section and/or article. The City Manager is authorized and directed to administer these rules and regulations incorporating this Administrative Code. Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer, to modify, establish or eliminate. Council Committee response: OK 1.2 As used in this Administrative Code, the following words and terms, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, shall have the meaning as defined herein: "Employer" - The City of Mound, Minnesota. "Appointing Authority" - The City Manager or other City officials to whom the City Manager has delegated authority to appoint personnel. "Benefits" - Privileges granted to employees which are included in the total compensation to employees. Includes, but not limited to vacation leave, sick leave, holidaY leave, funeral leave, military leave, hospitalization insurance, medical and dental insurance, life insurance, and Ion,q term disability insurance. Council Committee response: OK 7. 8. 9. "Call Back" - Return of an employee to work to perform assigned duties at the expressed authorization of the City at a time other than an assigned shift. An extension of or an early report to an assigned shift is not a call back. "Compensatory Time - (Comp-Time)" - Time taken off from the employee's regularly scheduled work week in lieu of pay. "Demotion" - The change of an employee's status from one position to another position having a lower salary rate. "Employee" - A person holding a position in the City service. "Leave" - An approved absence from work as provided by this Administrative Code. "Overtime" - Work performed at the express authorization of the Employer in excess of forty (40) hours within a seven (7) day period. -2754- 10. "Outside Employment" - Employment of any kind engaged in by a City employee for which compensation is received from a source other than the City. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. "Base Pay Rate" - The employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of longevity or any other special allowances. "Part-Time Employee" - An employee whose work schedule is less than forty (40) hours per week. "Regular Full-Time Employee" - An employee appointed to a regular full-time position after completing the probationary period. "Regular Part-Time Employee" - One that will average thirty (30) hours per week over a one (1) year time period. "Position" - An office, employment or place in the City service. "Probationary Employee" - An employee appointed to a regular full-time position serving the initial probationary period. "Probationary Period" - A trial period in a new position which is a working test period during which the employee is required to demonstrate his/her fitness for the duties to which appointed by actually performing the duties of the position. "Promotion" - The change of an employee's status from one position to another position having a higher salary rate. "Retirement" - The withdrawal of a member from active public service who is paid a retirement annuity thereafter. "Severance Pay" - Payment made to an employee upon honorable termination of employment. "Stand-By" - An employee kept in readiness to perform assigned duties at the expressed authorization of the City. "Temporary Employment" - Employment which is normally for short durations, seasonal in character and compensated for on an hourly or seasonal basis. "Termination" - A complete separation from City employment resulting from discharge, resignation, retirement or death. Department Head/Superintendent - A reqular full time employee who supervises others within a department or division of the City. Council Committee response: OK SECTION 2 - COMPENSATION PLAN RESPONSIBILITY The City Manager is directly responsible to the City Council for the coordination and administration of the salary program. All salary adjustments for employees shall be based upon the City's Pay Equity Plan accepted by the City Council in December 1999. Annual cost of living adjustments for all non-union employees shall be equal to the highest percentage given to Union Contract personnel each year. -2755- 2.2 PAY PERIOD All City employees shall be paid on a bi-weekly basis. Any employee may authorize deductions from his/her pay for any of the following purposes: 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. City employee's group insurance; ~.o, ited-VVay+ Short term disability Employee's organizations dues and fees; Credit Union; "...-.~ --.,,,=..~";""'° -..,,....,"'"'"'~"' Post Retirement Health Care Savings, Plan Deferred Compensation Plan; Supplemental life insurance; Cancer insurance; Other approved requested deductions. Council Committee response: OK 2.3 BENEFITS The City provides a cafeteria benefits plan (or pre-tax plan.) for its employees for the purchase of health, dental services, and dependent care expenses. 2,4 PAY SHEETS It is the Employee's responsibility to complete his/her time card. Any changes, additions, or deletions by a Supervisor must be initialed and a copy given to the employee. SECTION 3 - WORK SCHEDULES 3.1 The sole authority in work schedules is the Employer. T~. ...... '"O"~' '~"" for ..... ~ ...... ~'"' ~"~ '~;~'~'*/Q~ hours. The normal work week shall be forty (40) ~'' ~'''r"'~,/~ ...... ~ ~'~''~ \~l hours, Monday through Friday unless service to the public requires the establishment of regular work weeks that schedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays. Council Committee response: OK 3.2 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular shifts for some employees on daily, weekly, seasonal or annual basis, other than the normal 8:00 .~..M. '!.:30 P.M. day. The Employer will give advance notice to the employees affected by the establishment of work days different from the employee's normal e,i~h~8)-heu~ work day. Council Committee response: OK 3.3 In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances, such as, but not limited to, fire, flood, snow, sleet or breakdown of municipal equipment or -2756- facilities, no advance notice need be given. It is not required that an employee, working other than the normal work day, be scheduled to work more than eight (8) hours. However, each employee has an obligation to work overtime on call backs, if requested, unless unusual circumstances prevent him/her from so working. Council Committee response: OK, but read instead. In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances, such as, but not limited to, fire, flood, snow, sleet or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance notice need be given. Each employee has an obligation to work overtime on call backs, if requested, unless unusual circumstances prevent him/her from so working. SECTION 4 - OVERTIME PAY 4.1 Eligibility for overtime pay shall be determined at the time of appointment or at the time of establishing compensation for the position by the City Manager. 4.2 Hours worked more than forty (40) hours within a seven (7) day period, will be compensated for at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. All work performed on Sundays shall be compensated for at two and one-half (2-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate, unless Sundays fall within the provisions of Section 3, 3.1. 4.3 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation for regular and probationary full time employees, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded or paid twice for the same hours worked. Council Committee response: OK 4.4 Holiday pay shall be paid at a rate two and one-half (2-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. 5.1 5.2 SECTION 5 - COMP-TIME Eligibility to accrue comp-time is determined at the time of appointment or by Department Head. Accumulated comp-time cannot exceed 240 hours unless approved by a Department Head or the City Manager. If an employee is required to work, compensatory time shall be accumulated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. If, however, extra time is worked for the convenience of the employee, it shall be paid at the employee's regular base pay rate. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires overtime compensation or compensatory time off only for employees who are not exempt as executive, -2757- administrative or professional employees. FLSA does not require either overtime payment or compensatory time off for exempt level employees. SECTION 6 - CALL BACK An employee called in for work at a time other than his/her normal scheduled shift, will be compensated for a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate, except on Sunday which it shall be two and one-half (2-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate or on Holidays when it shall be two and one-half (2-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. SECTION 7 - STANDBY PAY Any employee placed on standby duty by the Employer shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours of standby pay. Standby pay shall be one-half (1/2) hours pay for each one (1) hour required to duty. SECTION 8 - COURT PAY In the event an employee is required to appear in court during his/her scheduled off-duty time, Such employee shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one-half (1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. An extension of or early report to a regular scheduled shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour minimum. 8.1 If an employee is required to appear in court durinq their off duty time, for an incident occurring while on duty for the City of Mound, such employee shall receive a minimum of two hours pay at one and one half employee's regular base pay rate. An extension or early report to a reqularly scheduled shift does not qualify the employee for the two hour minimum. Council Committee response: OK 8.2 In the event an employee is required to appear in court as in section 8.1 durinq their regular work day, this time will be treated as regular hours worked. Council Committee response: OK SECTION 9 - EDUCATION INCENTIVE The City shall provide an Education Incentive Plan for all regular full-time and regular part-time employees of the City. If funds are not provided by any other governmental agency, the City shall pay cost of tuition equal to that charged by State institutions after the employee has successfully completed a course with a grade of "C" or better. The -2758- course must be job related and pre-approved by the City Manager. Upon completion of the course, the City shall pay the employee a one time payment of five (5) dollars ($5.00) for each credit hour the employee earned. A certificate or some other proof of achievement in an approved course shall be placed in the personnel file of the employee. Council Committee response: OK SECTION 10 - MILEAGET MEALS~ AND LODGING REIMBURSEMENTS The City Manager or the department head may authorize travel at City expense necessary for the effective conduct of City business. Such authorization shall be granted prior to the incurrence of the actual expenses and shall be subject to the availability of funds. In the event an employee is eligible for mileage reimbursement, such employee shall be compensated at the rate established by the City Council. In the event an employee is authorized for reimbursement of meals and lodging such employee shall be reimbursed at the cost actually incurred providing such cost is reasonable and receipts are provided. SECTION 11 - DISCIPLINE 11.1 The Employer will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in the form of: a. Oral reprimand; b. Written reprimand; c. Suspension; d. Demotion; or e. Discharge. 11.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written form. 11.3 Written reprimands, to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees will receive a copy of such reprimands and notices of suspensions and discharge 11.35 At the request of the employee, all oral and written reprimands will be removed after 18 months provided there has been no disciplinary action taken against the employee during this period. The provision does not apply to discipline involving sexual harassment and discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, sexual orientation, or age. 11.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the supervision of the appropriate Department Head. -2759- 11.5 Discharges will be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. SECTION 12 - PROBATIONARY PERIODS 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a one (1) year probationary period. All existing employees will serve a six (6) month probationary period in any job description in which the employee has not served a probationary period. At any time during the probationary period a newly hired employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the Employer. At any time during the probationary period, a promoted or reassigned employee may be demoted or reassigned to the employee's previous position at the sole discretion of the Employer. SECTION 13 - SAFETY The Employer and the employees agree to jointly promote safe and healthful working conditions, to cooperate in safety matters and to form a Safety Committee to help advise the Employer of any unsafe conditions that exist or need attention. The department heads shall serve as this Committee. SECTION 14 - INSURANCE 14.1 The Employer agrees to pay the full premium for employee only hospitalization/major medical insurance for each full-time employee starting from the first of the month followinq afte~ thirty (30) days of continuous employment. The Employer agrees to contribute up to the amounts set forth below towards the cost of family coverage: 2002 --2gg4 onnq onn~ Medica $585.90 $~55.e0 $~!e.00 $705.00 Council Committee response: OK The Employer contribution amount will increase to offset the increases of the health insurance premiums at an amount equivalent to the highest amount specified in Union Contracts. Any additional costs for such family coverage shall be paid by the employee through payroll deduction, In no event shall the Employer's contribution exceed the actual cost of the coverage selected by the employee. -2760- Council Committee response: OK 14.2 Regular part-time employees are not eligible for hospitalization/major medical insurance benefits. 14.3 The Employer agrees to pay the full premium payment for a ten thousand dollar ($10,000) life insurance policy, and a long-term disability insurance policy, for each regular full-time employee, starting from the first of the month following afte~ thirty (30) days of continuous employment. Council Committee response: OK 14.4 Startinq from the first of the month followinq ,a~rte¢ thirty (30) days of continuous employment the Employer agrees to provide dental insurance coverage for each regular full-time and full-time probationary employee or pay up to tweP, ty-s~ ~11..~-,_~,,_,~/{O~._~.v_/('tr~\ twenty-eight, ($28.00) per month toward family coverage and full single coverage for each regular full-time and probationary full-time employee. The employer contribution amount will increase to offset the increase of the dental insurance premiums at an amount equivalent to the hiqhest amount specified in Union Contracts. Council Committee response: OK 14.5 The Employer agrees to pay the full premium for a Long Term Disability Policy (as enhanced on February 1, 2002) for each full-time employee, starting from the first of the month followinq afte~ 30 days of continuous employment. The qualifying period for the LTD shall be 90 days. Employees shall not earn more while on LTD than they would receive as base pay if they were in a work status. Council Committee response: OK 14.6 A short term disability insurance policy will be made available to employees on a voluntary basis after 30 days of continuous employment. The premium will be paid by the employee through payroll deduction. The employee may choose their desired benefit amount, not to exceed 60% of gross pre-tax income. 14.7 Employer contributions and insurance coverage as provided in 14.1 to 14.6 terminate at the end of the month of a tenured full time employee's termination, in good standing, and during a full time employee leave without pay, unless specifically stated elsewhere in this Administrative Code or required by State or Federal law. Employer and employee contributions remain the same as the prior month to termination. Council Committee response: OK SECTION 14A- HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN -2761 - 14A.1Monthly Contribution to the Plan All full time employees will make the following contribution of their gross pay, on a monthly basis, to the plan beginning January '1, 2005. All Non-Union Employees shall contribute in accordance with the following schedule: Income Level Points Years with City Points $30,000- 39,999 1 0 - 5 1 $40,000-49,999 2 6 - 10 2 $50,000- 59,999 3 11 - 15 3 $60,000-69,999 4 16 - 20 4 $70,000- 79,999 5 21 - 25 5 $80,000 + 6 26 + 6 Total points shall determine percent of contribution to the plan as follows: Points Percent 1 -3 3% 4-5 4% 6 or more 5 % All non-union employees with less than $ 3,000.00 in severance from accrued vacation and/or comp time shall receive such monies in a severance check. All non-union employees who have over $ 3,000.00 in severance from accrued vacation and/or comp time shall receive $ 3,000.00 in a severance check and the remaining amount shall be contributed to the plan. All Police Patrol Union Employees shall contribute in accordance with the following schedule: Income Level Percent Upto $40,000 1% $40,000-$50,000 2 % $50,000-$60,000 3% OverS60,000 4 % All police patrol union employees with less than $ 3,000.00 in severance from accrued vacation and/or comp time shall receive such monies in a severance check. All police patrol union employees who have over $ 3,000.00 in severance from accrued vacation and/or comp time shall receive $ 3,000.00 in a severance check and the remaining amount shall be contributed to the plan. All Police Supervisors shall contribute in accordance with the following schedule: -2762- 14A.2 14A.3 14A.4 Years with City Percent 1 -5 3% 6-10 4% 11 or more 5 % All accrued vacation and/or comp time shall be contributed to the plan at retirement or termination. All Public Works and Parks Union Employees shall contribute in accordance with the following schedule: Years with City Percent 0-5 1.0% 6-15 2.0% 16 - 20 2.5 % 21 - 25 3.0 % 26 or more 5.0 % After each pay period comp time in excess of 60 hours accrual shall be contributed to the plan. All accrued vacation and/or comp time shall be contributed to the plan at retirement or termination. Each employee group may choose to modify their plan every two years. The employer will contribute to the plan in accordance with the following schedule starting January 1, 2005. 1.5% of employee gross pay as of 1-1-05 2.0% of employee gross pay as of 1-1-06 3.0% of employee gross pay as of 1-1-07 4.0% of employee gross pay as of 1-1-08 Annual Contribution to the Plan All full time employees shall contribute annually 50% of all sick leave over 900 hours to the Plan to a maximum of 200 hours per year at current rate of pay ~'*""*~""~.,.......~ J=.".u=.~' '~. , -..-.~nn~: on January 1st of the contributinq year. Contribution to the plan will be determined based on the employee's sick leave balance ecr {~ec=,embe,c-3~~ "~v. ,r,..._ ...... r-. ~---...='~;~'" yaar as of the last full pay period in December and deposited into the employee's HCSP account ,.. ................. ,._, .... _."r-~-'u........ _."~= ..~.~ ....... .._.,. no later than January 31st of the contributinq year. Council Committee response: OK -2763- 14A.5 Contribution at Retirement or Termination At the time of retirement or termination, the employee shall contribute 1 00% of the sick leave portion of severance pay calculated according to section 18.1 to the Plan. SECTION 15 - HOLIDAYS 15.1 The employer agrees to provide the following paid Holidays to all regular and probationary full-time employees: New Year's Day President's Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veteran's Day Martin Luther King Day Thanksgiving Day The Day After Thanksgiving Day 1/2 Day Christmas Eve Day Christmas Day 1/2 Day New Year's Eve Day One (1) Floating Holiday Regular part-time employees shall be paid holidays designated above in direct proportion to the number of hours worked in the pay period in which the holiday occurs. 15.2 If any of the above Holidays fall on a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be a Holiday. If any of the above Holidays fall on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be a Holiday. (If New Year's Day or Christmas Day fall on a Sunday or Monday, the 1/2 day Holiday allowed for New Year's Eve or Christmas Eve shall be the preceding Friday.) 15.3 Any full-time regular or full-time probationary employee required to work on a Holiday shall receive two and one-half (2-1/2) times his/her hourly rate for all hours worked. Any regular part-time employee required to work on a Holiday shall receive one and one-half (1-1/2) times his/her regular base hourly pay rate for all hours worked. Work on a Holiday requires prior Department Head approval. Council Committee response: OK 15.4 An employee must work or be on a fully paid leave the working day before and the working day after the Holiday to receive Holiday pay. 15.5 The one (1) floating holiday will be prorated for employees who are hired during the current calendar year and who qualify for this Holiday. 15.6a Full-time employees and regular part-time employees subject to Section 3.2 who are scheduled to work on any holiday as listed in Section 15.1 will -2764- receive a one-for-one hour of deferred holiday earned. 15,6b All deferred holiday leave must be approved in advance by the employee's supervisor and must be used within six months. Council Committee response: OK SECTION 16 -VACATION SCHEDULE 16,1 Regular full-time and probationary full-time employees shall accrue vacation according the following schedule: YEARS HOURS EARNED NUMBER OF OF PER BI-WEEKLY DAYS SERVICE PAY PERIOD PER YEAR . O- 5 3.077 10 6-5 4.616 15 16-20 6.154 20 21-24 7.693 25 25 and over 9.230 30 Amend as follows - YEARS OF SERVICE HOURS EARNED PER BI-WEEKLY PAY PERIOD NUMBER OF DAYS PER YEAR 0-5 3.077 10 6-10 4.616 15 11-15 6.154 20 16-20 7.693 25 21-25 8.308 27 26+ 9.230 30 Council Committee response: OK Vacation leave benefits cannot be waived to receive cash wages. 16,2 Vacation leave shall accrue during the first year of employment but cannot be taken until after six months of employment. Time off may be taken as unpaid leave during the first six months of employment with the approval of the City Manager. After six months of employment, vacation leave must be approved in advance by the employee's supervisor. 16,3 An employee can carry over up to 480 hours of all earned vacation from one year to the next. All vacation time over that amount must be approved by the -2765- t6.4 City Manager In the event an employee is unable to take vacation as a result of their required presence at work as requested by the City, the employee shall continue to accumulate vacation hours until the time the City authorizes vacation. This must be approved by the City Manager. SECTION 17 - SICK LEAVE 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 18.1 Each regular full-time and probationary full-time employee shall earn sick leave with pay at the rate of one (1) day per month for each month of full-time employment with the City or 3.693 hours per pay period. There shall be no limit on the maximum accumulation of sick leave. After completing six (6) months of continuous service with the City, an employee may begin using his/her accumulated sick leave. Regular part-time employees shall earn sick leave in direct proportion to the number of hours worked based on the rate established for full-time employees. Sick leave may be used for an employee's own illness, physical examination, dental care, injury, maternity care, outpatient or inpatient treatment for mental illness, alcoholism, or drug abuse. Employees may also use sick leave for the serious illness, injury or other health care of members in their immediate family. "Immediate family member" here is defined as employee's mother, father, siblings, spouse, children, step-children, grandchildren, grandparents, and spouse's mother, father, siblings, children, grandparents and grandchildren. Employees claiming sick leave may be required to file competent written evidence that he/she has been absent as authorized above, or if more than three (3) days, that the employee has been under treatment and supervision of a doctor or dentist who recommends work not be performed. If the employee has been incapacitated for the period of his/her absence or a major part thereof, the employee may be required to provide evidence that he/she is again physically able to perform his/her duties. SECTION 18 -SEVERANCE PAY The following is the schedule of the sick leave portion of severance pay which shall become effective for all Full time employees after completing five (5) years of service. There will be no severance pay for less than five (5) years of service. The following schedule is based on a percentage of unused accumulated sick leave. After 5 years of service After 10 years of service 2005 2006 2007 2008 41% 44% 48% 53% 46% 49% 54% 59% -2766- After 15 years of service After 20 years of service After 25 years of service 52% 55% 60% 66% 57% 60% 66% 73% 62% 66% 72% 80% 18.2 Sick leave shall be paid to the plan in accordance with Section 14A.5 of the Administrative Code. 18.3 An employee who is discharged from employment for just cause shall not be entitled to severance pay under this Section. SECTION 19 - FUNERAL LEAVE Funeral leave for immediate family, not to exceed three (3) days will be allowed by the City Manager. If more than three (3) days are required, the employee may choose to deduct the extra days over three (3) from either vacation or accumulated sick leave. Immediate family is defined as mother, father, siblings, spouse, children, grandparents and spouse's mother, father, siblings, children, grandparents and grandchildren. SECTION 20 - EYE EXAMINATION The Employer agrees to pay up to fifty dollars ($50.00) ~"",..,,v..,,,=; ........ ...v,, *'...... ,.,*,,- ~,~_, .... (2,1) mcnths every calendar year of full-time employment toward an eye exam or the purchase of eyewear for each full-time regular employee. This amount Will be prorated for employees who are hired durinq the current year. Council Committee response: No SECTION 21 - INJURY LEAVE In the event a City employee or regular part-time employee suffers an injury while in the line of duty for the City, a report of the accident shall be made immediately and all necessary forms completed by the Department Head. SECTION 22 - MILITARY LEAVE A regular full-time or regular part-time City employee who is a member of the National Guard or the Reserve Forces of the United States of America shall be entitled to military leave as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 192.26 through 192.264. SECTION 23 - JURY LEAVE Any City employee who is required to serve on jury duty shall be granted an amount of -2767- compensation which will equal the difference between the employee's regular base pay and compensation paid for jury duty. SECTION 24 - LEAVE OF ABSENCE WITHOUT PAY The City Manager may, upon recommendation of the employee's department head, allow a regular full-time employee a leave of absence without pay for a period of up to ninety (90) days for oi,.~. .... .~i...~,i,;,,, ,~io.,~;,i, .... ,..,,.,~ ,,., ,.~,i,,~ birth,, ,.~,i~,~ .... ~ ..... er-ether-good and sufficient reasons which are to be in the best interests of the City. Such period may be extended up to six (6) months with the authorization of the City Manager. Each case will be determined on its own merit. A!sc, *~,.~ ........ """"~..v,vv ..... re=t,, _v~.,', ..... ~'"~ * .... ~'~""* *"" "~c'-''''~ opinion ~-,',,',, ~ ,~,.,-*,-. ,-,~ ,k.. city's chccslng An employee must submit a notice of intention to return from leave to the City Manager before he or she can be returned to active status 30 days prior to the employee's desired return, or similarly of his or her plan to retire or resign from service. While on leave of absence without pay, the employee shall not be entitled to accrue vacation leave, sick leave, receive insurance benefits, or earn seniority. Insurance benefits may be obtained by the Employee paying his/her full premium if allowed by this code, federal or state law. Council Committee response: OK SECTION 24A - FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT Pursuant to the Family Medical Leave Act of 1993, the City provides twelve (12) weeks of job protected unpaid leave to eligible employees for the birth and care of a child, the placement of a child with the employee for adoption or foster care, the employee's serious health condition and to care for a spouse, child or parent with a serious health condition. ELIGIBILITY - An employee must have been employed by the City for at least twelve (12) months, and have worked at least 1,250 hours during the twelve (12) months preceding the commencement of the leave. AMOUNT OF FMLA LEAVE -An eligible employee is entitled to twelve (12) work weeks of leave. The length of the leave will not exceed 12 work weeks in a 12-month period. The 12-month period is measured forward from the first date FMLA leave is used. -2768- ELIGIBLE REASONS FOR FMLA LEAVE- Eligible employees are entitled to 12 work weeks of unpaid family and medical leave per year for: o Birth ofthe employee's child and in order to care for the child. o Placement of a child with the employee for adoption or foster care. o To care for a spouse, child, step-child, or parent who has a serious health condition. This includes psychological, physical care, and sharing care duties. o Serious health condition making the employee unable to perform the essential functions of his/her position. NOTICE REQUIREMENTS - An employee must submit the application for Family/Medical Leave form to provide the City with thirty (30) days written notice if the need for leave is foreseeable. If thirty (30) days notice is not possible, as much notice as practical must be given. Planned medical treatments should be scheduled so that it will not unduly disrupt the City's operation. INSURANCE COVERAGE DURING LEAVE - DUring a period of FMLA leave, an employee will be retained on the City's health plan under the same conditions that applied before leave commenced. To continue health coverage, the employee must continue to make any contributions that he or she made to the plan before taking leave. Failure of the employee to pay his or her share of the health insurance premium may result in loss of coverage. If the employee fails to return to work after the expiration of the leave, the employee will be required to reimburse the City for payment of health insurance premiums during the family leave, unless the reason the employee fails to return is the presence of a serious health condition which prevents the employee from performing his or her job or to circumstances beyond the employee's control. ACCRUAL OF OTHER BENEFITS DURING LEAVE -An employee is not entitled to accrual of any seniority or employment benefits (during an unpaid portion of FMLA leave) that would have accrued if not for the taking of leave. An employee who takes FMLA leave will not lose any seniority or employment benefits that accrued before the date leave began. INCREMENTS OF TIME - Family and medical leave may be taken in a (12) work week block or in increments as small as one (1) hour, depending on the circumstances. When medical treatments are planned, employees should consult with their respective Department Head and make reasonable effort to schedule the leave so as not to unduly disrupt the City's operations. USE OF ACCRUED SICK LEAVE, COMPENSATORy TIME OFF AND VACATION DURING FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE - During FMLA leave, employees must may use accrued sick leave, vacation and/or compensatory time prior to taking unpaid leave. ~ 'o~ ,-~ ....... ,~ ..... *;-,,, *;~-~ ;~ --,, option '~,,~ -2769- :re c×h:'.':t:d. When sick leave and compensatory time and accrued vacation time have been exhausted, any remaining time will be unpaid. Unpaid hours will not count toward seniority and benefits will not accrue during this unpaid leave. An employee drawin.q benefits from short term disability insurance is not allowed to be compensated throu.qh vacation, sick or comp time accruals. The employee may not use vacation, sick or comp accruals in coniunction with short term disability payments to receive more than their reqular waqes. Under FMLA, while receiving a short term disability benefit, the employee status remains the same as if they were usinq their accrued sick, vacation or comp time. Council Committee Response: OK in principle, using this language instead. USE OF ACCRUED SICK LEAVE, COMPENSATORY TIME OFF AND VACATION DURING FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE - During FMLA leave, employees may use accrued sick leave, vacation and/or compensatory time prior to taking unpaid leave. When sick leave and compensatory time and accrued vacation time have been exhausted, any remaining time will be unpaid. An employee when drawing benefits from short term disability insurance as per section 14.6 is not allowed to be compensated through vacation, sick or comp time accruals. Unpaid hours and time on short term disability, with no pay from the city, will not count toward seniority and benefits will not accrue during this unpaid leave. The employee will be entitled to continue to receive life and long-term disability benefits as provided by the city before the FMLA leave. MEDICAL CERTIFICATION - An employee will be required to submit a completed Certification of Health Care Provider Form (Dept. of Labor Form WH- 380) for FMLA leave, based on the serious health condition of the employee or the employee's spouse, child or parent as completed by the applicable health care provider. RE-CERTIFICATION - Re-certification of the FMLA leave will be required if the employee requests an extension of the original length of FMLA leave initially approved by the City if circumstances described by the initial medical certification change or if the city receives information casting doubt on the employee's stated reason for the absences. RETURN FROM LEAVE -An employee must complete a "Notice of Intention to Return From Family or Medical Leave" before he or she can be returned to active status. If an employee wishes to return to work prior to the expiration of a FMLA leave of absence, notification must be given to the employee's supervisor at least five (5) working days prior to the employee's planned return. FITNESS FOR DUTY CERTIFICATION - In the case of FMLA leave due to an employee's own serious health condition, the City requires a medical certificate attesting to the employee's fitness for duty prior to return to work. The fitness for duty report must be based on the particular health condition(s) for which the -2770- leave was approved and must address whether the employee can perform the essential functions of the job. RESTORATION TO EMPLOYMENT - An employee who takes FMLA leave - may be restored to his or her original position or to a position with equivalent pay, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment. A "key employee" - meaning a salaried employee who is among the 10 percent highest paid employees at the City - may be denied restoration to employment of restoration will cause substantial and grievous economic injury to the operations of the City. FAILURE TO RETURN FROM LEAVE - The failure of an employee to return to work upon the expiration of FMLA leave of absence may subject the employee to termination from employment. SECTION 25 - COMPENSATION FOR TIME NOT WORKED 25.1 If the employee chooses to go home due to inclement weather, he or she may compensate himself or herself through the use of vacation or comp time accruals, or remain unpaid. If building maintenance problems at City Hall or inclement weather causes Management to close City Hall, the employee shall be compensated by the City for the time lost at their regular rate of pay. SECTION 26 - LEGAL DEFENSE 26.1 The purpose of this section is to establish a policy and procedure to be used in determining whether the City should provide defense and indemnification to City employees. It is the policy of the City of Mound to provide defense and indemnification in accordance with the public policy implicit in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 and to protect those performing governmental services on behalf of the City of Mound against risk of liability from lawsuits. It is the policy of the City to provide defense and indemnification for all its employees in accordance with the public policy articulated in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. 26.2 SCOPE OF AVAILABILITY. The City shall defend any officer or employee for any tortious conduct arising out of any alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of the duties of his/her position. If the City determines that any officer or employee is guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect of duty, or bad faith, it shall not defend or indemnify that officer or employee. 26.3 PROCEDURE. When an employee is served with a summons and complaint in a lawsuit, the employee must fill out a form requesting that the City defend the employee. This form shall be required in all lawsuits where employees are named as individual defendants. The employee shall submit the form to the -2771 - Department Head for certification that the employee was acting within the scope of his/her employment and acting in the performance of the duties of his/her position. The Request to Defend Form and Departmental Certification shall be sent to the City Attorney's Office. After the form and certification have been signed and presented to the City Attorney's Office, the City Attorney and Department Head will review the Request to Defend Form and Departmental Certification to determine if the conduct occurred within the performance of the duties of the position and to make a preliminary determination whether the conduct involved malfeasance in office, willful neglect of duty or bad faith within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. If the City Attorney and Department Head determine that the employee was acting within the performance of the duties of his/her position and that conduct did not constitute malfeasance, willful neglect of duty, or bad faith, the City Attorney's Office will represent the employee or retain separate counsel in accordance with ethical requirements. If the City Attorney and Department Head determine that defense and indemnification is not appropriate because the employee was either not acting in the performance of the duties of the position or was acting in bad faith, malfeasance or willful neglect of duty, the City Attorney shall notify the employee of that preliminary decision. A contract Administrative Law Judge will be retained by the City to conduct a hearing, if desired by the employee, to determine whether the City has an-obligation to provide a defense and indemnification to the employee. The employee may present evidence, witnesses and argument before the Administrative Law Judge and cross-examine witnesses. The Administrative Law Judge shall issue findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendation(s) to the City Manager specifically addressing whether the employee was acting within the performance of the duties of his/her position, or is guilty of malfeasance, bad faith or willful neglect of duty. The recommendation(s) of the Administrative Law Judge will be submitted to the City Manager for a final decision. If the Department Head and the City Attorney are unable to agree on whether the employee should be defended and indemnified by the City, the case will be presented to the City Manager for a preliminary decision. If the City Manager determines that defense and indemnification is appropriate, the employee shall be immediately notified. The City Attorney's Office shall provide a defense in accordance with ethical principals. If the City Manager preliminarily determines that the employee should not be defended or indemnified by the City, then the matter shall be referred to an Administrative Law Judge for a hearing as described above. 26.4 Attached to this policy and procedure is a flow chart which is designed to illustrate graphically the City's procedure for providing defense and indemnification to City employees. -2772- SECTION 27 - RESIGNATION 27.1 vacation or comp,time may only be used during the ~o weeks notice period with the prior authorization of the City Manager (non-exempt employees). 27.2 Vacation time may only be used during the 30 days notice period with the prior authorization of the City Manager (exempt employees). Counc# Committee and Staff Committee responses: OK 28.1 28.2 28.3 SECTION 28 - MISCELLANEOUS RELEASE OF NEW INFORMATION No City employee shall release any information regarding City business without the approval of the City. In the event information is requested on City business, such inquiries shall be directed to the department heads or the~City Manager. DISPOSAL OF CITY PROPERTY No City property shall be disposed of without the approval of the City. Before the City property is disposed of, a letter of inquiry shall be submitted to all department heads through the City Manager stating the description and function of the item and if any department is in need of or can utilize the item. CLOTHING Each regular full time employee shall receive wearing apparel with the City insignia on it not to exceed the cost of $35. $50.00 per employee, per year. Council Committee response: OK 29.1 29.2 29.3 SECTION 29 - COMPLIANCE TO THIS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT. This Administrative Code shall be deemed conditions of employment, in the City service and violations of these rules and regulations may constitute just cause for disciplinary action or dismissal by the City. ADMINISTRATIVE PREROGATIVE This Administrative Code shall cover the items set forth, however, this Code shall also permit administrative prerogative in making decisions regarding conditions not included in the Administrative Code. POSITIONS COVERED All offices and positions in the City service that now exist or hereafter are created -2773- shall be subject to the provisions of the Administrative Code except the following: 1. officials elected by the people; 2. members of boards or commissions; 3. the City Attorney; 4. Union Contract Employees - unless specifically stated by the individual bargaining unit contract as to which section and/or article. Council Committee response: OK 29.4 City Management will meet no less than every two years with the employee representing group to discuss possible changes to the Administrative Code. No changes will be made to the code without discussion between the City Manager and the Administrative Employee Representatives. SECTION 30 - EMPLOYEE RIGHTS In the case of a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the Administrative Code, or if a conflict otherwise arises, the employee shall work first with the Department Head to resolve the matter. When that cannot be accomplished, the employee may redirect the matter to the attention of the City Manager with notification to the Department Head. -2774- Exhibit A - Section 26 - Legal Defense -2775- CITY OF MOUND MEMO 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOL_JND, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0600 -- FAX: (952) 472-0620 WF:F:~: www. cityofrnound.corn DATE: TO:. FROM: August 8, 2005 'Mayor Meisel Council Members Docks and Commons Commissioners 'm ~'ackler, Parks and Docks Stipt RE: Slips Usage The Mound Dock and Slip Program is growing, and along with that come the growing problems. There a~e 88 boats in the Multiple Slip Program and 502 boats in the Dock Site Prograxn, Startingin 2006, there will be 37 additional slips (dedicated to the Villas on Lost Lake), with a whole separate set of problems. With our changing, clientele, closer monitoring of the Programs became necessary. To manage the misuse and violations of the Code as they relate to the Dock and Slip Program, a Community Service Officer now doubles as Dock inspector, The goal is to inspect four times per season and to roust out the lack o.f use and the misuse. The Program apPlication, which goes out in January, clearly states the registration and boat-on- sire'requirements. They are reminded again in a letter in April when they are issued their site. Those in the Slip Program must register their'boat by May 15 and have the registered boat physically moored at the slip on June 15. This year on June 15th, 25% of the 88 Slip Site holders did not comply. They were sent a courtesy notice reminding them or'he compliance regulations, (notice not required under the Code), giving them 14 days to comply. All but 4 Slip Holders responded. Three out of four of those are appealing the loss of their slip. The City continues to have a long waiting list'of residents eager to be part of the Program-- about 120. Giving customers ample opportunity to stay within the Program is fair. It is also then a fair expectation that they communicate with City Hall as to their interest in retaining their slip. Their failure to communicate implies their lack of value for the slip. The matter of"value" is one to be discussed. Staffhas heard from the Council and the DCAC . that they want to see the slips in use. Staff has also taken complaints from other Mound residents -2776- about why slips are not being used. I.t is Staffs believe that,there 'are only two ways to cause a site holder make use of their slip. The first is to require the boats be at the slips more tkaen just the one day (J~ 15) and'to Verify that through 'inspecti6ns.' The second is to .charge a fee that is significant enough that the site holder feels they have t° use the slip to justify the rental cost. Staff has b'een very open to working with Slip Site holders who notify the city that they are having problems with their boat and meeting the date requirement. In fact, a Code pro'vision allows Site Holders to opt out for a year if a site holder knows they won't have a boat. We don't, however, believe there is an adequate commitment to the Program when there is no communication after repeated notices from City Hail. To close, remember thOse people waiting on the list. Also, remember the language ancl intent of the Code. Simply put, the issue comes down to applying the code or removing it from City Ordinance. To not enforce it is the City in violation. -2777- t -2778- / / -2779- CITY-OF*MOUND 5341 ~AYWOOD ROAD MOLJ ND, MN 55364-1687 PH: C 9521 472;0600 FAX: (9,52) 472-0620 WEt~,: www. cityofmound.corn From: Date: Ret DCAC Dock Program. Administration 7/6/2005 City of MOund Dock Program: Non-cOmpilers On June 15, 2005 Officer Hughes inspected all multiple, slips in the City of Mound. His ins. pections found.that-24 ieaseh01ders were not' in compliance with the 'June 15, 2005.deadline for having watercrafts moored.to the multiple slip sees for. inspections. Officer Hughes 'sent a memorandum to the 24 noncompliant leaseholders informing that they failed to meet the June 15, 2005 inspection deadline. Officer Hughes explained 'that they were required .to have their watercraft moored to their slip for the next inspection date of June 29, 2005. As a result of the memorandum Officer Hughes received proper notice of delay from 7 ieaseholders and gained compliance from 13 additional leasehoiders that moored their watercrafts to the multiple slip sites by the 2nd deadline of June 29, 2005. Attached is a list of the 4 ieaseholders that.failed to meet either of the inspection deadlines and also failed to contact Officer Hughes or the Dock Program Administration for resolv .e. -2781 - MAYWOOD ROAD MOU. I~ID, MN 55364-1687 PH: (952) 472-0fl00 FAX: (952} 472-0620 WEB = ~vww. clty~mound.com MemorarxtJm To. N0rrine FOrrest Site #0703~i~ 162,4 Finch Ln- Mound, MN 5,5364 F~om: Dock Program Administration Date: '07106/05 Re: RevocatiOn of Permit On 06115/2005'Officer Hughes inspected your permlffed slip site and found that thewatercraff listed on your application was not moored to the site. This is 'in violation of'Mound'CIty Code 437.~2 Subd. 2. On 06/16/2005 The Dock Program Administratior~ mailed you a (Failure to compiy):memorandUm. The memorandum stated that a re-inspection ofyour permitted slip site was to be ~on'ducted on D6/~g/2005 and.that you were required to have your wate~a~ moored to the slip for this re-inspection. On 06/29/2005 Officer 'HUghes re.inspected your site and did' not find your watercraft moored't° your permltted slip site per the requirements of the memorandummailed on 06/16/2005.~. Because you failed to comply with either inspection your, permit is being t;evoked by the Clt7 of MOUnd. You may appeal the revocation. Any such' appeal must be in wrffing and SUbmitted to Ctty Mar~ager · Kandis Hans0nwithin 10 days. ordinance 437.12 Subd; 2,. Uae Reau~md~ The registered watercraft identified ~ t~e slip for wfiioh th~ City slip permit was hued mu~t be. moored at the Slip no later than June 15 .of the boating season for-Which the permit was isSued. If inspection by the City Dock Inspector discloses that the permit holder has not complied with thla requirement, the CE7 may ~ the pem~lt by wr~t~n notice t~ the holder ¢Ethe permit. The permit holder will forfeit any fees paid to the city ~l'.the slip; The holder ~f the permit may appeal the re~ocation. Any such sppeat, mu~t be filed in wilting wifll the CltyManagar wi~in 10 days after mailing of the City's notice of revocation. The appeal must Specify any reasons for objecting to.the City's decision' and any mrdgsttng circumstances or other facts relating to the permit holder's faiture to register a bceL The appeal'will first be referred to the Dock and Commons Advisory Commission (DCAC) fOr review and recommendation. ' Following receipt Of the DCAC review and reCOmmendation, theCity Council will* I~ear the"appeal at*a regular meeting and will ~onslder any wrtt~n or oral information presented by the permit holder, the public and the City staff. After consideration'of such: ir~formation, tile City Cound. JI wtll affirm or revemethe decision to rewke'~e permit.. If the decision is affirmed, the City. may then issue a permit .for the slip to*the next qualEied parson on,he waiting list entitled to* the slip upon payment of the full tee for the permit. CC: DCAC '. Resident File · Jim Fackter Kandis Hanson U um 5341 IMAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MN 55364-1687 PH:. (~2) 472-0600 FAX: (952) 472-0620 WEB: www, cltyofmound;com To: Denis'~ Malarky Site ~4660A 1'701 Shorewood Ln Mound, MN 55364 From: Dock Program Administration Date: 07/06/05 Re: Revocation of Permit On 06/15/2005 Officer Hughes inspected your permitted slip site and found that the watercraft listed on your application was not moored, to the site. This is in violatiofi of Mound City Code 437.12 Subd. 2. On 06/16/20'05 The Dock Program Administration mailed you a. (Failure to comply) memorandum, The memorandum stated that a re-inspection of your permitted slip site was to be conducted on 06/~_9/2005 and that you,.were required to'have your watercraft moored to the. slip. for this re-inspection. On 06/29/2005 Officer HUghes re-inspected your site and did not find your watemmft moored to your permitted slip site per the requirements of the memorandum mailed on 06/16/2005, Because you'fatled to con~[y with.either inspection your pen'nit is' being revoked by the City of Mound. You may appeal the revocation. Any such appeal must be in writing and submitted, to City Manager Kandis Hanson within 10 days. . Ordinance 437.12 Subd. 2, Use Reauired. The.registered watercraft identified to'the sap.for which the City slip permlt was i~sued mu~t be moored at the slip no later than June 1Ii of the'b~i~flrig s~o.'n. far which the pern3.tt was issued. If inspection by the City Dock I.nspector discloses that the permit[ holder has not complied with this mquim~ment, the City may revoke the permit by written ~otice to the holder ofl~e, permlLThe permit h01dei'will forfeit.any fees paid to the City far the slip. The holder of the petmtt may appeal the revOcatior~ Any such appeal must'be filed in, writing with the City Manager within '10 days after mailing of the Clty's notice.of revocation, The appeal must specf~fy any reasons for objecting to the City's decision apd any mitigating circumstances, or other facts relating to'the permit hofdeYs fatlure to register a boat. The appeal wtfl first be referred to the Dodo and Commons Advisory Commission (DCAC) for review and recommendation. Following receipt of the DCAC review and recommendation, the City Council will hear the appeal at a regular meeting and will consider any written or oral information presented by the permit holder, the public and the city staff. After consideration of such information',' the City Counclt v~l affirm or reverse the decision to. revoke the permit. If the decision is affirmed, the City may then issue a permit for.the slip to the neXt qualified person, on the waiting list entitled to the slip upon payment of the full fee for the permit. CC: DCAC · Resident File Jim Fackler Kandis Hanson 457. I0. gubfl. 12. number of the boat and shall be Jimited to21 daYS. Any.violation 0fthis S~ction 43~/ by.the dock licensee shall result in the loss or revocation of the.dock licer~se unless the City COL~nCil .ghall determine'upon evidence' submitted by the license~ that:there were mitigating circumstances. The City CoUncil may determine'that rew.0oation is too severe a .Penalty and may then condition .said 'license so that a'ny futur e Violation' will result in automatic revocation. (ORD, #53-t991, 12-23-91 )(ORD. #9,=1-.1998: 1- 17-98) (ORD. 01-2.001,2/25/01 ) Subd. 13. LiCenses Non-Transferable, Dock licenses and permits issued by the City are personal in nature and may be used only bythe licensee or ~ embers of their households. No dock licensed by the City or located on public streets, roads, parks, or public commons may be rented, leased, or sublet to an~j person, partnership or corporation." If a licensee or p~rmit'holder rents,, leases, su blots, or in any manner charges of receives consideration for the use of his or her. dock, his or her license shall be revoked, 437..12 Regulations.for City of Mound Owned' Multiple Slip Dc) cks, Subd. 1. Watercraft Reqistration Required on City of Mound OWned .Multiple Slip Docks. A watercraft must be registered by May.1 of'the ourr--'-~nt · boating season for a new/renewal permit to be.issued for a City of Mound municipal slip. If a pen-nit'is not issued/renewed because of the permit holders' failUre to register a watercraft as required in. this subdivision, the permit holder may appeal, in. writing.to l~he-City ManagerWithin 30 days after'the refusal by the City to issue/renew the permit. The appeal musi specify any reasons objecting to the City% decision. and any mitigating circumstances or other facts relating to the Permit holders' .failure to.register a boat. The appeal will first'be r'efer[ed to the. DOck and' 'COmm0n~ Advisory. Commission (DCAC) for' review and recommendation. Following receipt of the DCAC revieWan'd' re%mmendation, the City'COuncil will hear the appeal at a regular meeting' and wilt consider any written' or orat information Presented by the permit holder, the · public, and the City staff. After Consideration of such information, the. City ' Oouncil. will' affirm or reverse the. decision'.not tO.issue/renew the permit. Subd. 2.. ' Use Required. The registered watercraft identified to the .slip f6r which the Cit~ Slip permit was issued must be moored at the slip no later than .. 'June 15' of the boating season for which the permit.Was issued. If inspection by the City Dock inspector discloses that the .permit holder has. not complied with this requirement, the City may revoke [he Permit 'by written notiSe to the holder of ' the permit. The permit holder will forfeit any fees paid to lJhe City for the slipl The. holder of the permit may appeal the revocation. Any such' appeal must be filed in writing with' the City Manager within 10 days after mailing Of the Oity'~ notice of revocation. The appeal must specify any reasons for objecting to the ¢,ity's decision and any mitigating circumstances or other facts:relating to thepermit holder's failure to register a boat. The appeal'will first be referred to th~ DoCk and Commons Advisory Commission (DCAC) for review and recomme, dation. - 2784- 9/211C)3 Mound Ci~'C0de 437,12, Su.bd..2, .FOllowing 'receipt..0f the DOAC review and recommendation, the City Cc3u ncil will hear.the apPeal .at a regular.meeting: and will consider any written or oral 'inf0rm'ation presented by the permit holder, the.public and the City staff. After consideration of such information, the City Council ,will affirm or reverse the - decision to. revoke the permit; If. the decision is'affirmed, the City may t, hen issue a permit for the slip to the. next qualified person 'on the.waiting Ii'st entitled to the slip upon payment Of the full fee for the permit. Subd, 3; Exception to'Watercraft Reqistration or Use Requirement,. At any time' prior to the expiration of the rights to appeal set- forth in Subd. 1 and 2,. a person may: apply for an exception from. the 'May 1 and/or June 15 registration and use pro.visions by written application to the City Manager. stating the fac(s, circumstances and hardships w. hiCh would' support the requested.exception. If the City Manager or Ci.ty Manager's designee determines that there are circumstances which would create Undue hardships for the permit holder if the May 1 and/or June 15 provisions are strictly enforced, the City Manager or City Manager's designee may grant an appropriate exception to. the permit holder. The exceptior~.'may be limited to a specific watercraft and may be subject to time limitations or. other conditions ss may be imposed. The. findings of. the City Manager or Git3/. Manager's designee .will be presented in.'writing to the Docks and Commons Advisory CommisSion. Subd. 4.. Voluntary Suspension of Permit. A. permit holder, or a person entitled to a new permit, may'volu.ritadly suspend the dght to such' a permit'for one. boating season or part thereof'by written notice to the City pdor to June 15 of the boating.season for which' tlie permit is. to be. issued. The Ci~ mayl sublet l~he space to the person with the highest priority .on the waiting list forthat type of space for that boating season, or a specified portion thereof; !f such Written notice is given pdor to dune 15 0f'the boating, season in question.,, the original ' permit' holder will then be entitled to 'renew the permit;for the following yea,r and the person who sublet the 'space will' beretumed to the same priority on the waiting .list...Any person who is entitted to a permit and who does not comply with the provisions of'subdivisions ! arid 2 of this section, and who does. not obtain a.n exception"under subdivision 3 of his Section., or does not, before June 15,. provide the written notice of voluntary suspension~ will' l°se .all 'rights to the permit and all rights to any. priodty on the waiting list fOrthat tYpe of space.. No person shall be allowed to voluntarily suspend the right, to either a new permit or.f'enewal of an existing' permit for two consecUtive boating seasons. (ORD....10- 2001,12/8/01 ) · 9/21/03 -2785- 2.005 DOCK SLIP LICENSE APPLI'CATION CITY OF'MOUND, 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD,. MOUND, MN 55364 MOUND.RESIDENT: Please complete and retum BY.FEBRUARY 28, 2005 (must be postmarked · by February 28, 2005). Applications postmarked on or after March I, 2005 are placed in the third'(3rd) priority category. INSURANCE COMPANY & POLICY # A COPY OF YOUR CURRENT.DNR WATERCRAFT LICENSE' MUST BE ATTACHED '.AND INSURANOI~. INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO VALIDATE YOUR BOAT SLIP. . NO RENEWAL APPLICATIONS WlLL BE PROCESSEI~'~/ WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION. APPLICANTS NAME MOUND STREET ADDRESS .. RENEWAL: 2004 Multiple Slip # HOME PHONE WORK/CELL PHONE Permanent ReSident (owner) Winter mailing address if different than above Renter: (proof of residency required with application) i/atercraft List watercraft to be kept at this slip. Furnish MN DNR Watercraft'LicenSe Number, make, size and color of boat_ Add the L.M.C.D. Boat Fee; based on the table below, to the Permit Fee. NO PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT THIS INFORMATION and a photocOpy, of the currant DNR Watercraft License: BOAT OWN ER'S NAME DNR WATERCRAFT LIC # MAKE OF BOAT` LENGTH COLOR'OF BOAT LMCD BOAT FEE LMCD BoAT FEES: LENGTH AS STATED ON MN DNR WATERCRAFT LICENSE (in feet and inches) 20'0" and. less = $ 7.50 20'1" and up to 24'0" = $11.25 24'1" and upto 32'0" = $15.00 32'1" and up to 40'0" = $18.75 other side for important information about pertinent Ordinancesl -2786- 2005 Dock Slip License Application ImPortant note: 2 Pertinent.Ordinance. s!/ Mound CIty Ordinance 437. O~i Subd. 6: WA TERCRAFT TO BE DESIGNA TED. Watercraft that are moored, perked or allowed to be parked at a City ... ~ck/siip si~e must be designated on the dock iicense application.. The appficant must provide the :City w/th proof of waterc~ft license in the form of a copy =the current. DNR Watercraft l_icense dr recently applied for. watercraft Ucense for each watercraft:, at the time of application. If~ ~ different watercraft is to ~ moored or parked at a licensed dock, it must be. designated by Supplying the. same proof of watercraft license.to the City before parking o!~ mooring the starcraft af the dock/sliP site. Parking or mooring of e non-designated watercraft at a City dock slip site will result in the imposition of a civil penalty ~" i ;25. O0/day~').against the. holder of the dock license as established in accordance., with ~he provisions of ..Section 500 of the City. Code. Failure. to pay .the I~ vli penalty within ten days of imposi~on, is a misdemeanor and will result in enforcement under Subsection 437.20. -~(--~)-~ ~ i~und~ity-Q~inanee4$7~-42-RBGU~`"A:T~N$~F~R-TH~C~"T-Y~F~M~UND-~WNED-MULT~P&E~SuP-DQcK~-(E~c~rpts~ofJ:~r`~lin~nce)--~: ~ ~bd. 1. Watercraft Registration Required on City of Mound Owned Multiple/Slip Docks.. A wa~rcraff must be registered by/Hay 1 of the current .~ ~ting Season for a new/renewal permit to be issued for a slip. ' .." · ' - .',.. i ': ' . ':' ' - · · . ' Subd.2. Use Required. The regis~ered Watercraft iden#fied to the slip for.which the City siip permi! was issued must be moored ~t the'slip 'no la'er than June 15 of the boating season for which the perm/t was issued. Subd. 3. E.~ception to Waterc~ft Registration of Use Requirement. At any time prior fo the expiration of the rights,to'appeal set fodh in Subd. 1 and 2, a person may apply for an exception from the May 1' and/or june 15 registration 'and use provisions by.wrfffen application ~o the City'Manager stating the facts, circumstances and he,ships which would support the requested exception. Subd.4. Voluntary' Suspension of Parrot; A permit holder, or person enVied'fo, a new permit, may voluntarily suspend the right ~o such a permf~ for one boating season or part thereof by'written no~e to the. City prior to June'15 of ~ boating season for which the permit is to be issued. The City may sublet the space to the person with the highest pdorfty on the wailing list for that type of space for ~hat boating season, or spec/fled por'b'on thereof. If such written notice is given prior fo June 15 of the.boating ~eeson.in c/uesfion, the ortginal portal, holder. Will then be entitled to renew the per~'nit for the following year and. the person'who sublet the space'will be returned.to the same priorfty on the waiting iisi. F~e$ Codin.q DOCK SLIP FEE: $300 281-34725 PWC SLIP FEE: $1~3 281.34725 LMCD BOAT FEES: s, p~ ~ t.b,.281-34705 LIGHT FEE: . $10.50 28t-34725 (Highland Multiple Only) TOTAL DUE: $ **MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: CITY OF MOUND · Permits will not be issued to any non-resident of Mound. Proof of residency must be furnished if requested. Any false information given or violations .of Dock Ordinance 437 shall be reason for denial or revocation of permit LIABILITY DISCLAIMER: I (We) acknowledge that the City of Mound is not responsible for any injury occurring.on this multiple slip dock. DATE signature RETURN THIS APPLICATION WITH INSURANCE INFORMATION, APPLICABLE FEES AND A COPY OF CURRENT MN DNR WATERCRAFT LICENSE TO THE CITY OF MOUND BY FEBRUARY 28TM, 2005. -2787- 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOLJND; MN 55364-.168,7 PH: (952) 472-0600 FAX :..(@52)~ 472:0620 W~l~: wWW. clty0frnound.com MEMORANDUM 'Date: Apdl, 2005 To: MultiPle Slip License Holder From: DoCk Program Administration Subject: 2005 Multiple. Slip Site #/Location: Slip Size: 'Boating season is upon [~'~'~'~'~'"~'i'~"Y"~-~'~-~%%[J'~%'~";ii'~j' ~'b-~;~-~i~""i~ ........... ass.!g:ned, to yeu'fer:the' 2005 Season,.:. If you.need.iieiP .iocating'.your site,..piea~l~'- 472,06,13'foh.aS~is~n~: ' Please note: · "Docks are insta!!ed'as weather and.dock company schedule permits. · Boat lifts are not allowed, at multiple slip sites, · ii~'ere is t° 6e no Storage of~ P~:~'rJa[it~m'~ 0ri'.',{he dodk,. · There is to be no attachment .~ p.ersgn, al .items to the dock. Share arrangements. are no{..a]lowed. " N0"-~h~ai~ihg cT' moored boat .WithOUt~, cheCking .With.the doCt~ administratiOn prior. ,~,~our ~beat'must be' mooited.tO the dOck-no late, r, ~than June ~5, Each. individual dock license, holder' must maintain the cleanli'ness of'.~eir dock site area'. The area m'u~t be free of litter, debris.and' aquatic vegetation, which has accumulated' on the shoreland. The grass at the shoreline must be maintained and trimmed. Please be considerate of neighbors when you are'leaving the lake at night. please 'be aWare of the information on the back of this ieffer regarding your responsibilities as a dock holder and,Mound 'City Code` Section 437 relating to.Dock Licenses. Thank you for your cooperation in making the public lands safe and attractive to help everyone have an enjoyable boating season. (over} _ 2788-?~'~°'~ YOUR RESPONSI'BILITIES.AS,A DOCK LICENSE HOLDER 1, Maintain' the. cleanliness of the' a:rea.bY'your Site, inclUding grass cutting and · weed trimming. Boats and other personal items cannot'be stored on the public shoreline during the boating season., They must be in the water or removed from the public property by June 1. No tires Will be allowed on docks. 3. Response to correction notices must be made Within the time specified or your dock license will be in jeopardy. Only boats registered on your dock apPlication may be moored at the slip, 'Unregistered boats moored to your dock are subject to a $25/day fine to the holder of the Dock License. 5, Any.change from the prior years dock permit has to be approved by the Dock administration. This includes boat size', All slip sites have size limitations. importent note: 2,Pertinent Ordinaneesfl Mound City Ordinance 437.01 S~bd. 6: WATERCRAFT TO BE DESI{~NA TED. Watercraft that are moored, parked or' allowed to be watercraft license in. the formal a copy of the. current DNR Wa,ts. re, fl License. or recently applied for Watemmft License or each ~ supp~yfng~thesame`pr~f~f.wetaromft~icen~e~to~fhe~ib/~befe~e~par~dng.~rm~rfng:~e-wa~ at~ttq dook/slip.~.,Ite..F~arking.c~ \0,~ ~ moorfng of $ non-designated webers'aft at a City dock slip. slte wlll resu/t in the/mpos/tion of e civ/l ~,~rt~/~,~ ($25.00/c~ey) .againSt the ~ holder of'the clock license as established in accerd,~nce with the provision~ of Sedan 500 of the City C,6de. Fallgre "to pay ~e civil Mound City Ordinance 437'. ~2 REG'UL.A TION$ FOR THE CrI'Y OFMOUND OWNED MUL13PLE SLIP DOCKS. (EXbetp~ of ., '~,eSubd. ~. Watercraft Registrati~.n.. l~eqqirff, .C~,O~ C. ,1!~ ~ ~Un.d. ~ed MqffJp,..!.e' sliP Docks; A watercretf rnu~t be registered by May ~ f off he current boating season':roi" a n~Wyr~hb'~l' p~rmlt fo' be'i/~ub~J .fOr e t~li~ , . , . Subd.3. Exception to Watercraft RegiStration Of~ Use i~e~Tu irern' en~ At anytime prfor' t~' th6"expiratJon Of the dgh'tS ~ appeal set forth In Subd. 1 end 2, a per, on may apply for an exception fromthe May 1' and/or Junb'f 5 registration anti use [~fOvisloft~ by wrftten application tO the, City Marmge~ steUng ~he facts, circumstances and hardships which would support the mque~d exception: Subd.4. Voluntary Suspension Of P'erml~- A permlt'holder,, or person entltied to a new permit, may voluntarfly suspend the i'ight to such a permit:for one boating season or part thereof by written noUce to the City pdor to June f 5 of the bceting season for whtoh the permif is to be issued. The. City may auble~ the space' fo theperson with the highe~pdority on the waffJng list for that b/pe of for that bo'ating season, or ~ p6rtich' thereo'f, If . sgch h/fftten notic~ is j~iven pr/or to' June 15of the boating season' in question, the odginal permit holdar wlll then be ante_ed to renew the permit fo~.the following year end f,fe person who sublet the ,space wi/l be returned to the sa~'ne.priOrf~y on the ~Vi~itl~g'li~[' ' ' ' Mound City Code Section 437:10 Subd. 13~ - Dock licenses and permits issued by the City are personal in nature and may be used only by the licensee Or members of their household, No dock licensed .by 'the City of. Mound located on publiX'Streets, roadS', parks or public commons may be rented, leased or sublet to any per;son, partnership or corporation. If the licensee or permit holder rents, leases or sublets or in any manner charges or receives consideration for the use of the dock, the licenSe shall be revoked. -2789- Present: DOCKS COMMISSION MI ,S 7:30 ,at Mound Ci,ty Hall Thursday ,A, u~ust 18, 2005 Commissioners Jim Funk, Frank Ahrens, Michelle Olson, Greg Eurich and Mike Specht Excused: Commissioner Gerlad Jones Chair Jim Funk called the meeting to order at 7:30 1. Approval of July 21, 2005, Minutes Motion to approve the July 21, 2005 Minutes made by Ahrens Second made by Olson Agenda Changes Motion to move handout to ~a made by Specht Second made by Funk Comments and suggestions ~cuss Public Lands Permit . 4~87 Island View Dr. -Applicant Mike and Sara McCue A~r city o~cials have looked at the permit they saw no reason, but to approve it except for ~g Skinn0r with exceptionS. Skinner requested a letter from the applicant stating that th~ applicant will take full responsibility for any maintenance problem. Funk then asked the applicant if he was aware of the mount that is involved with fees and the applicant was aware and ready to take full responsibility. Ahrens concern was if the easement was located on the CommonS. AhrenS main concern was if the McCue's would have to get an application from the Minnehaha Watershed District. Fackler staled that it shouldn't be a problem and that he will look into it and let the applicant know what is the next necessary step. Motion for approval if the Minnehaha Creek watershed District made by Specht Second was made by Em'ich Motion carried. Ahrens only one to oppose 48. Discuss Public Lands Permit 4939 Island View Dr. Faekler started by giving an overview of the parcel involved. The request is the taki.'ng down ora home and subdividing it and having two homes there. -The request of the Public Lands Permit for the corner of Devons Public Lands fee not 2790- be charged to the applicant. Ahrens asked if this is something that anyone is able to do. He also stated that an application is a requirement from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Motion to rule the Public Lands Permit made by: Ahrens Second made by: Funk Discuss Slip Usage Appeals Norrine Forrest Denise Malarkey Ralph Mcfall Fackler started out with a brief summary of previous years and because of high water last year,. Mound did not require the boats to be in by a certain date. This year they feel is different bemuse there wasn't any high water. Complaints have come in from residents, city employees, and people on the waiting list about people not using theirslips adequately. Funk stated that the boat slips areto be used for boats and not fishing or anything else of that kind. He also stated that in the application it clearly states that the slips are to be used and have a boat in the slip bya certain date. Funk requested that lvls. Forrest approach the podium, Forrest stated that the boat was not in the water became it was being repaired, Weather was also a factor with getting the boat in time. Forrest stated that she has had the slip for many years and she did not respond to the notice within 14 days because family was in town. The discussion then centered around why Forrest did not call and that the call to the city stating why her boat was not in the water by the deadline. Funk then stated that Forrest could go to the city council for another appeal. Motion for recommendation to the council and see no reason why the ordinance shouldn't be upheld made by: Funk Second made by: Ahrens Comments: Olson said that it is a huge step that Forrest had made because she was there for her appeal. Funk then stated that the council will have the final say. Speeht agreed with Olson saying that she has had a slip for many years and has never had a problem before, and suggests that there should possibly be some cushion. Motion carded'. Opposed Specht and Olson Motion to deny the appeal of Malarkey made by Ahrens Second made by: Em'ich -2791 - e Ralph Mcfall was not present at the meeting but was discussed. Speeht stated that if there is a mechan/cal pmblem that is a reasonable excuse. Ahrens understood that there is an ordinance for a reason and it is no good ifw~ do not follow it. Fackler also stated that it is pointless to have an ordinanc~ if we do not follow through with it. Ahrens stated that the Docks Commissiom BOard originally drafted the ordinauCC. Motion to deny the appeal to Ralph Mcfall made by: Ahrens Second was made by Funk Motion carded, opposed Specht Discuss Dock Fee and Spreadsheet Faclder summarized the spreadsheets for the board and stated that the city manager suggested that there should be a fund balance of $100,000. The board then stated that there was a reasonably large gap in the two sheets in 2005. Ahrens then stated that it should be the same on both sheets. The diseussion then centered around the differences in the two budgets presented as well as what the fund balance should be. Katie suggested that the slip fee be raised because the city is currently losing money on the slips. There was also a discussion about the Villas as to who would take care of the maintenance and the fees for the docks. Inspections will still stay with the city but there is still an' administrative cost involved. Motion to recommend council to just look at 2006 to maintain a $100,000 balance with a $25 increase for dock fee and $50 for a slip fee made by Funk Second made by: Specht Motion withdrawn by Funk New Motion to recommend the city COunCil for dock fee for $300 and slip fee of $375 and the fund balance is $100,000 made by: Eurich Seeoud made by: Specht Motion Fails .... 2 to 3 For it: Specht and Eurich Opposed: Olson, Funk, and Ahrens Discussion carded on about what the budget should be Motion that regular dock fees be at $275, slip fees at $300-350, personal watercraft from $113-125, and share $150-200, and the fund balance is where ever it lands made by: Ahrens Second made by: Funk -2792- Discussion centered on how the fund balance should increase over a period ~f time along with docks; For it: Ahrens, FUnk, and Olson 7. Agenda Calendar Opposed Specht and Eurich A report of the September events was made by Funk Motion to adjourn the DCAC meeting at 9:53 pm made by: Funk Second made by: Specht -2793- 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (952) 472-3190 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director September 6, 2005 Shoreland Regulations / Approved DNR Standards Background. As the Council may recall, an issue was recently raised by the DNR regarding the City's lot requirements as referenced in City Code Chapter 3350.1225, Subd. 1 (Shoreland Regulations Lot Area and Width Standards) and the original approvals granted by the DNR in 1994. Specifically, City Code Chaper 350.1225, Subd. 1 reads as follows: "The lot area and width standards for residential, commercial and industrial lots within the shoreland area shall be as found in the applicable sections of the Mound Zoning Code" Discussion. As stated above, the City's adopted shoreland regulations indicate that lot area and width standards shall follow the applicable sections of the zoning ordinance. Therefore, the minimum lot size allowed for properties in the R-lA and R-2 District is 6000 SF and minimum lot width is 40 feet (at the lake and street.) The shoreland ordinance, as approved by the City of Mound in 1994, included the same language as referenced above. According to information contained in the official approval letter from the DNR dated September 8, 1994, the City was granted flexibility to allow a 10,000 SF minimum lot size and 60 foot lot width (at the lake and street) rather than the state shoreland standard(s) of 15,000 SF and 75 foot lot width. Of note, the aforementioned standards are the same as the R-1 District. Staff has researched the history of the City's shoreland ordinance regulations. Based on the City's Flexibility Request dated September 22, 1992, all "new" lots regardless of district requirements, were to meet the 10,000 SF lot size / 60 foot width standard. However, this language was not included in the shoreland ordinance, as adopted by the City of Mound, nor have the aforementioned standards been "applied" to new subdivisions. -2794- Members of the Council are ~advised that DNR Staff has advised the City that it needs to submit a '~exibility request" to the DNR to request approval of the standards of the R-lA and R-2 Districts and/or process variance(s) pursuant to the City Code as the lot requirements for the aforementioned zoning districts are not consistent with the DNR-approved standards. Members of the Council are advised that land use requests abutting Lake Minnetonka are routed to the DNR Hydrologist for review and comment effective August 2001. It is important to note that the issue was informally raised previously by DNR Staff on a non-riparian minor subdivision a few years ago at which time Staff referenced the language in the adopted shoreland regulations. Following Staff response, no further comments from the DNR were received regarding the matter. The shoreland regulations were incorporated into the City's zoning code as opposed to establishing a separate oveday distdct as the 1000 linear foot shoreland area encompassed approximately 85 percent of the community. However, it is assumed that the 10,000 SF lot size and 60 foot lot width provisions apply only to properties abutting Lake Minnetonka. It is unknown whether properties which abut Commons property would be subject to the DNR-approved standard(s). Additionally, the applicability of the shoreland standards for waiver of platting applications may merit discussion as they involve "original platted lots" and therefore may not qualify as "new lots." Of note, City Code allows Waiver of platting applications to retain "lot of record" status. Request. Staff respectfully requests input and direction from the Council regarding the City's response to the issue raised by the DNR regarding inconsistencies regarding the original approvals granted by the DNR and the City's adopted shoreland regulations. · Page 2 -2795- Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: "Julie Ekman" <julie.ekman@dnr.state.mn.us> To: <SarahSmith@cityofmound.com> Sent: Monday, August 01,2005 10:48 AM Subject: Lot size Sincerely, Julie Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist West Metro, Central Region 3 Mn Department of Natural Resources-Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106-6793 (651) 772-7919 (651) 772-7977 fax julie.ekman~dnr, state.mn.us Visit DNR Waters' website at: http ://www. dnr. state, nm. us/w ater s/ - 2796 - 8/17/2005 Page 1 of 1 Sarah Smith From: To: Sent: Attach: Subject: "dulie Ekman, <julie.ekman@dnr.state.mn.us> <sarahsmith@cityofmound.com> Wednesday, June 22, 2005 9:29 AM 0622081851 .pdf Comments: subdivision at 4539 Island View Dr. Sarah, Subdividing this lot will result in two lots smaller than the minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. ~A 1994 city had requested flexibility from state shoreland standards to allow 10,000 sq ft rather than th standard 15,000 sq ft requirement for General Development lakes. The 10,000 sq fi request was approved. I've attached a scan of the approval letter. Julie Julie Ekman, Area Hydrologist West Metro, Central Region 3 Mn Department of Natural Resources-Waters 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, MN 55106-6793 (651) 772-7919 (651) 772-7977 fax julie, ekman(-~_,dnr, state .mn. us Visit DNR Waters' website at: http://www.dnr, state.mn.us/waters/ -2797- 9/7/2005 STATE OF 'DE.PA-RTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 500 IiAFAYETTE ROAD * ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA * 55155,40 -- DNR INFORMATION (612) 296-4800 Sept:ember' 8, t994 The Honorable. Skip Johnson Mayor, City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mou~d, MN 55364-1687 Dear Mayor Johnson: APPROVAL OF MOUND'S SHORELAND MANAGEMENT CONTROLS Thank you for submitting your city's request for flexibility from the statewide shoreland management rules.'and your community,s' shoreland management controls (which were .adopted August 23, 1994) for the Department of Natural Resources' (DNR) review. I will address the flexibility request first, Your city staff presented memoranda which requested flexibility from'statewide standards in the following areas: 1, ~- 10,000 square foot lots (versus 15,000. for riparian General Development lakWs, i.e., Lake Minnetonka, and 20,000 for riparian & 15,000 for non-riparian with Recreational Development lakes, i.e. Langdon Lake) 2. ~ - 60 foot minimum width (versus 75 foot minimum) 3. buildin= setbaGk.- 50 foot for riparian lots (versus 75 feet for riparian lots on Recreational Development lakes). 4. .PUDs (called PDAs} - flexibility to the PUD regulations should redevelopment ,be proposed in the R-4 districts; would allow up to 14 unite/acre (versus 12. unit~-/ acre if in tier.3 and above, with multiplier 5. impervious surface (all versus 25% maximum):' a. residential - up to 30% (up to 40% if techniques are used t~ reduce negative, impacts) b. cemmercial/industri&l - up to 30~ c. ~roiaI/indUstrial with.adopted stormwater management ~~.a~.~._a~d! facilities in place - up to 75%' 6. "i'~ff .... '-- 35 feet (versus 25. feet) in all zones but Cent'r~Busi~ess District (where up to 45 feet is allowed and over 45 feet with CUP) 7. 'bluff setbac~ - 10 foot setback from top of bluff in existing developed areas (versus state minimum of 30 feet; new "major" subdivisions will meet 30 foot setback) 8. Rioht-of-wav setback - 20.foot setback from right-of-way line for federal, state, or county highways (versus 50 feet). AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER -2798- .The Honorable Skip Johnson Approval of Mound,s shoreland Controls Page 2 The city's letter and attached materials adequately describe those Situations and .justifies its request. I am hereby fully approving the. city's request for flexibility. I also am informing you that the city's land use controls fully comply with Minnesota Rules, Parts 6120.2500 - 6120.3900, and are hereby approved.. We remain available to assist the city with implementation and enforcement of'the ordinance. As required by the ordinance, notices of all hearings and notices of decisions for variances, conditional uses, and amendments in sh°reland. areas must be submitted to the Department. These should be sent directly to Area Hydrologist Ceil Strauss at the following address: DNR - Division of Waters, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106. I wish to Congratulate you for the efforts of the city council, planning cdmmission, staff, and local citizens in protecting the water resources of Mound and the State of Minnesota through the adoption of its land use controls which include the statewide shoreland management standards. Sincerely, DIVISION OF'WATERS O Supervisor Land Use Management Unit OS/CCS/EF c: D~le Homuth, RegionaI Hydrologist ~eil Strauss, Area Hydrologist Ed Fick, Shoreland Program Manager Mark Koegler, Consulting City Planner · Pam Albrecht, Division AcCountant -2799- 06/15/2Q05 14:10F. F.F.F.F.F.F.F.F.~I 9524720620 CITY OF ~OUND ~ LOREN GORDON ~004 Hoisingmn Koegler Group Inc. Octol~r 9, 1992 Mr. Edward L. Fick Shoreland Hydrologist Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St. Paul, Mb/ 5,5106 Dear Mr. Fick Iindosed, please find a copy of the draft of Mound's Shoreland Management Ordlnanee. This document is being submitted for review by the DNR. and for distribution to Lake Minnetonka area communities. The Motmd Planning Commission held a public hearing on the ordinance on September 28, 1992. The City Council has scheduled further public hearings for November 7, '1992artd November 24, 1992. Adoption of the ordinance is anticipated to occur at the November 24th meeting. Mourtd's Shomland Management Ordinance will require flexibility from the State Rules. The areas of flexibility have not changed from those that l; outlincni at the Technical Review Committee Meeting on September 22, 1992. For your convenience, I have enclosed a copy of the TRC memorandum. Please note that the City has added "lock boxes" as allowed water-oriented accessory structures. In order to assist you in the review of the Mound ordinance, I will prepare the Shore. land Ordinance Review Checklist and submit it to your office within the next week If you have any questions on any of this material, please contact me. Sincerely, R. Mark Koegler, RLA Mound 'City Planner RMK:dbm cc: Mr. Ed Shulde, City of Mound Land Us, lEnvimnmenral . Planning lD~gn 7300 bl~rO ~d~va~d I Suite 525 , Minnmp01k, liinn~ou ,~}439 ' (612) 831-9960 · Fax: (612) 85%3160 -2800- MEMORANDUM TO: LMCD Technical Review Committee FROM: Mark Koegler, Mound City Planner DATE: September 22, 1992 SUBJECT: Shoreland Management Flexibility Request INTRODU(~FION The City of Mound is approaching full development. The community currently has 9% of its land classified as vacant. Three parcels comprise the vast majority of Mound's vacant land. The remaining vacant land consists of infill residential lots that are scattered throughout the community. Development in Mound's early years consisted primarily of small cabins surrounding Lake Minnetonka. Cabins were converted into year-round residences and the community saw the development of a downtown commercial area and an industrial zone. The development pattern that exists in the community today is the direct result of these historical factors. Correspondingly, a land use pattern that has its origins in the 1900's is not readily adaptable to the dimensional development standards used in the 1990's. Without the application of reasonable "flexibility" in the interpretation of State Shoreland Rules, the vitality of the community will be seriously threatened and the property rights of residents will be significantly impaired. The eventual adoption of Mound's shoreland management ordinance will require flexibility in the following areas: LAND USE Application of the 1000 foot shoreland area to the City of Mound covers approximately 85% of the community. Therefore, new regulations pertaining to the shoreland area are being incorporated directly into the City's Zoning Code rather~l~ than establishing a separate overlay zone. -2801 - A variety of land uses are found within Mound's shoreland area including most of the central business district and all o£ the industrial area. Mound's Comprehensive Plan calls for the retention of the industrial uses and the revitalization of the downtown commercial area. Goods and services that are available in Mound serve local residents as well as residents [Tom surrounding communities. Employment opportunities appeal to individuals ~rom an even broader geographic area. Because of the importance of continuing the commerdal and industrial uses at their present locations, Mound is proposing to allow such uses either as permitted uses or conditional uses, depending on the nature of the business. The charts entitled Uses - Residential Zones and Uses - Industrial Zones (Appendix A) identify all allowable land uses within Mound's shoreland area. In some cases, uses shown as permitted or conditional may require flexibility from State standards. LOT CHARACTERISTICS The legacy of Mound's historical development pattern is a community of small, developed lots. At the present time, the City has two different single family lot size requirements, R-1 requires 10,000 square feet of lot area and R-2 requires 6,000 square feet of area. The zoning map included as Appendix B identifies the locations of each of these zones. Concurrent to the preparation of a new shoreland management ordinance, Mound tis modifying various portions of the existing zoning code. Specifically, provisions in the proposed ordinance change will require that all new single family lots created through the subdivision of land will be required to have a minimum area of 10,000 square feet, regardless of the applicable zoning district. Lots of record will be considered buildable if they comply with the underlying zoning requirements. Proposed residential lot characteristics are as follows: Zone Lot Size Lot Width R-1 10,000 60' R-2 10,000 6O' Lot of Record 6,000 40' R-3 (Duplex) 14,000 80' Lot of Record 12,000 80' R-4 22,000 120' Note: Setback from OHW in all zones - 50' 2 -2802- Mound's lot size and width requirements will require flexibility from the State standards (Appendix C). Strict application of the State standards is not only infeasible but impossible in a community that is virtually fully developed. Application of lot standards other than those identified would result irt variance requests for virtually every property within the City. DENSITY/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS Mound will request flexibility from the State standards regarding multi-family density and planned unit development provisions. The State standards require that any structure containing more than four units be processed as a planned unit development. Mound's R-4 zoning defines multi-family as any project having four or more units per structure, however, it does not require such projects to be processed as planned unit developments. Under the current 1{-4 provisions, projects with an overall density of 14 units per acre are allowable under the R-4 zoning provisions rather than under specific PUD provisions. This issue impacts only the redevelopment or reconstruction of existing projects since all R-4 properties within the City are fully developed. Should any of these developments be destroyed by natural disaster, the City wants to maintain the ability to approve reconstruction without requiring PUD approval. It does not, however, desire to expand such density to other portions of the City. Mound does have PUD provisions as part of its zoning code. In Mound, a PUD is know as a planned development area (PDA). At the present time, the City's shoreland provisions will modify the existing PDA language to add the density restrictions and establish tiers as is found in the State standards. This will ensure that future planned development areas including redevelopment projects outside of the R-4 zone will develop in accordance with the density standards .found in the State rules. IMPERVIOUS COVER Mound's current zoning code does not contain impervious cover restrictions. In reviewing the issue of impervious cover, the City conducted a parcel by parcel review of various areas in the community to arrive at a reasonable limitation. Based on that research, Mound will request flexibility to utilize the following impervious cover restrictions: Residential - 30% Commercial/Industrial - 30% Commercial/Industrial with adopted stormwater management plan - 75% 3 -2803- Impervious cover will be defined to include areas covered by buildings, driveways, walkways and patios. Decks will be counted as 50% impervious providing they are constructed over a permeable surface such as turf. Decks constructed over an impermeable surface will be counted at 100%. BUILDING HEIGHT Mound currently has a height limitation of 35 feet in all of its zoning classifications except the central business district. Within the CBD, the Mound code limits buildings to 45 feet in height. Structures exceeding 45 feet require the issuance of a conditional use permit. The City desires to maintain the height limitation of 35 feet throughout most of the community. The Mound Planning Commission also feels that buildings exceeding 35 feet in height are appropriate in the downtown area. SHORELAND AREA IMPROVEMENT Mound's ability to effectuate any transformation of the shoreline of any of the lakes within the community is severely limited by the existing development pattern. Despite this fact, the City is committed to the incremental improvement of all shoreland areas. In support of this commitment, the City's proposed draft shoreland ordinance currently prohibits all water oriented accessory structures except at-grade decks. Additionally, all structures will be required to meet a 50 foot setback from the OHW regardless of the placement of neighboring structures. 4 -2804- -2805- -2806- 0 0 0 0 -2807- -2808- -2809- -2810- Appendix B -2811- Appendix C 5.12 SeWered Lakes: A. Natural Environment: Riparian Lots Area Width Single 40,000 125 Duplex 70,000 225 TripleX 100,000 325 Quad 130,000 425 B. Recreational Development: Riparian Lots Area Width Single ' 20,000 75 Duplex 35,000 135 Triplex 50,000 195 Quad 65,000 255 C. General Development: Riparian Lots Area Width Single 15,000 75 Duplex 26,000 135 Triplex ' 38,000 195 Quad 49,000 255 Nonriparian Lots Area Width 20,000 125 35,000 220 52,000 315 65,000 410 Nonriparian Lots Area Width 15,000 75 26,000 135 38,000 190 49,000 245 Nonriparian Lots Area Width 10,000 75 17,500 135 25,000 190 32,500 245 -2812- Page 1 of 3 Kandis Hanson From: To: Sent: Subject: "Leah Weycke¢' <weyckerl@westonka.k12.mn.us> "Leah Weycker" <weyckerI.Central.Westonka@westonka.k12.mn.us> Thursday, August 18, 2005 12:32 PM WHCC 8/24 Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Wednesday, August 24, 2005 12:00-1:30 PM Gillespie Center 2590 Commerce Blvd. Mound · Any comments or questions, contact Leah Weycker, Collaborative Coordinator, at 952-491-8058 or ** AGENDA** 1. Lunch 12:00 Feel free to bring your own bag lunch or join us for a light "free will donation" lunch, suggested value $6.00. 2. Introductions 3. Announcements 4. Additions or changes to the agenda / minutes 5. Discussion on Westonka "Community Plan of Care". We talked about this at the last meeting. We will review what we learned and develop a plan of action for our community. What resources do you or your agency offer? How do you communicate to other agencies? How can families with multiple needs be best served? "Do at least two things everyday that you don't want to do, for the very reason that you don't want to do them." -- William James (1842-1910) ** Advisory Group Updates** Health - Depression and Suicide Awareness Task Force Sandy Olstad, Mary Goode, Jeanette Metz, Mark Brekke Beautiful, purple earrings are for sale by members of the domestic - 2813- 8/18/2005 Page 2 of 3 violence awareness group. The profits will benefit Sojourner Project and our local support group. Kelly Bahr has replaced Peg Deluge at the Mound Ridgeview Clinic. Kelly met with Jessie Billiet, WeCAN Health Advocate, and myself to discuss the Clinic Connection. Things are going well and filling the gap in services we were hoping for. Already this year we are at $6,312 of medical treatment for low income and uninsured families. The prescription assistance is also going well and will run out of funds soon. Youth Activities - Skate Park Task Force Sandy Rauschendorfer-temp chair, Jean Ann Thayer, Kathy Jones, Kim Erickson Heiar, Kathy Jones, Amy Taggart. Spirit of the Lakes, Festival of the Arts on July 16th, was a hot one. Even with temperatures in the high 90's, we still had close to 100 kids participate in the parade. Five new students and six returning students participated in the YMCA dirt bike program this year. It was a long, hot summer but the lcids were sad to have it end. It was a good program this summer! The skate park shelter is still hanging by nails. It was hard to get volunteers to put in extra time after the long summer hours. We hope to have it finished this fall. The half pipe is being built by Rick from Brenshell Homes. He is welding the sections together in his garage and will assemble it at the site this fall. Irrigation and grass seed will be finished when the weather is better for growing grass. Parent Education Sandy Wing, Sandy Olstad, Holly Rakocy, Amy Taggart Amy has participated in some events this summer. She attended one dirt bike class with Leah and the boys. Community Margaret Holste, Carol Olson, Ginny Lozano, Jeanette Metz, Dena Kuenzel The community group has not met. Leah continues to work on policies for coordinating the wedding rentals at Gillespie Center, one of their main income sources. Cheryl Fischer, Minnetrista Mayor and Beth Dodge, Gillespie Assistant, are all on the rental team. Executive / Finance Kim Heiar, Carol Olson, Margaret Holste, Sandy Wing, Sandy Raushendorfer, Mary Hughes The executive group did not need to meet this month. Alliance for Families and Children in Hennepin County A task force is meeting to come up with a new Collaborative structure in Hennepin County. The state continues to tell us we are non-compliment because of our county representation. Leah pleaded the case in our state report - we'll see if that helps. The 90% funding cuts are still anticipated. We will know more after - 2814- 8/18/2005 Page 3 of 3 October and will need to have a discussion about what we will do under the new structure and minimal funds. ** Westonka Healthy Community Collaborative Minutes - June 22, 2005** Present: Sandy Olstad, Amy Taggart, Gloria Lundberg-Jorgenson, Leah Weycker, Bill Erickson, Denise Eng, Theresa Ledermann Guests: none 1. Amy made a motion to approve the minutes, seconded by Bill. Motion passed. 2. Announcements: We discussed the Alliance meeting for realigning the Collaborative system in Hennepin county. Kim and Mary Hughes were our representatives at the meeting. A ten person work group is being formed to come back with recommendations. Gloria Lundberg announced that she will be one of the task force members. Amy attended two of the kindergarten round up's. She was surprised at the number of kids that have not been screened. The ones that are missed will be behind because of the late start of services. (We need to ask Sandy Wing how the process works and how it can be improved.) 3. We discussed a graph that Leah drafted for Family Service Collaborative state statute requirements. Questions came up about who is on our CTIC's. (Ask Gwenn Spence) The WHCC can serve in this roll as well as others. Over all, it will help to develop a "community plan of care" and focus on the statute requirements. From that we will develop a work plan for the collaborative, keeping in mind the funding cuts and possible lack of coordination. The work plan could be approved by the WHCC and the providers. We will need to implement the work plan and track the outcomes. Within the next two months, Leah will get a group together to answer some of the questions about the "Community Plan of Care". How does the communication system within our community work? How can it be improved? What are the barriers to better communication resulting in improved services to families? The key people with this information that need to participate: Denise Eng, Gwerm Spence, Ginny Lozano, Sandy Wing and other school people, someone from the police departments. Amy would like to participate also. 4. A reminder that there is no meeting next month. The next meeting will be August 24. Amy moved to adjourn, Sandy Olstad seconded the motion. Motion passed. Recorder Leah Weycker - 2815- 8/18/2005 Date Weather 8/1/2005 8/212005 8/3/2005 8/4/2005 8~5/2005 8/6/2005 8/7/2005 8/8/2005 8/9/2005 8/10/2005 8/11/2005 8/12/2O05 8/13/2005 8/14/2005 8/15/2005 8/16/2005 8/17/20O5 8/18/2OO5 8/19/2005 8/20/2005 8/21/2005 8/22/2005 8/23/2005 8/24/2005 8/25/2005 8/26/2005 8/27/2005 8/28/2005 8/29/2005 8/30/2005 8/31/2005 Totals Harbor Wine & Spirits Aug 2005 Cust. '05 Cust. '04 Variance 2005 sun/hot/90 277 sun/90 308 PTLY CLDY,( 288 SUN/84 344 sun/85 557 SUNNY sunny sunny/90 285 SUN/80-90 274 sunny/80 286 cldy/rain70 310 ptsun 80 582 cldy/cool/70 568 sun/cool 70 sunny/80 282 ptly sunny84 287 pt.sun/warm 305 CLDY/RAIN~ 280 overcast 80 513 sunny/80 636 clds/sun70 sun/70 259 cldy/rain70 284 cldy/75 268 SUN/80-90 290 sun/cool 70 513 sun/80 639 sun/cool 70 SUNNY 266 sunny/70 263 WARM/82 286 9450 277 4906.59 280 28 5055.01 288 4973.O6 253 91 6520.54 288 269 11902.45 522 -522 525 -525 285 4884.31 247 27 4843.36 211 75 5541.54 247 63 6233.59 290 292 12415.4 491 77 13605.52 612 -612 282 5407.62 252 35 4929.56 270 35 5543.56 226 54 5786.86 257 256 11119.94 442 194 14165.3 526 -526 259 4654.69 228 56 4495.95 231 37 5117.5 262 28 5340.26 243 270 10252.17 477 162 13288.37 539 -539 266 4614.86 224 39 4266.56 216 70 5373.17 0 8359 ~091 185237.74 2004 Difference +/- 4906.59 3709.41 1345.6 4247.59 725.47 4675.44 1845.1 5292.26 6610.19 10274.55 -10274.55 11683.58 -11683.58 4884.31 4012.31 831.05 3603.65 1937.89 4022.66 2210.93 - 5076.57 7338.83 9976.57 3628.95 12569.33 -12569.33 5407.62 3842.65 1086.91 4570.21 973.35 3546.12 2240.74 5554.15 5565.79 9219.57 4945.73 11695.18 -11695.18 4654.69 3420.26 1075.69 3700.25 1417.25 4261.56 1078.7 4119.73 6132.44 9893.82 3394.55 11657.6 -11657.6 4614.86 3550.43 716.13 3610.77 1762.4 0 161786.22 v/23451,52 C~sh +/- -0.1 4.24 2.21 3.48 -1.9 10.34 -0.61 4.67 10.85 -44.57 0.34 -12.03 1.19 -20.42 -0.05 3.63 -0.97 -0.77 3.88 5.34 1.09 -155.12 165.07 -0.46 0.21 0.36 -29.44 -2816- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET EXPENDITURES REPORT Aug. 2005 66.67% Aug. 2005 YTD PERCENT BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED GENERAL FUND Council 78,850 8,379 52,581 26,269 66.68% Promotions 3,750 0 3,750 0 100.00% City Manager/Clerk 291,290 22,514 182,835 108,455 62.77% Elections 1,250 0 380 870 30.40% Finance 247,440 17,875 157,779 89,661 63.76% Assessing 83,300 0 83,244 56 99.93% Legal 160,420 15,242 73,622 86,798 45.89% City Hall Building & Srvcs 115,660 11,852 73,628 42,032 63.66% Computer 21,430 27 11,477 9,953 53.56% Police 1,378,530 110,568 890,395 488,135 64.59% Emergency Prepardeness 7,100 120 5,889 1,211 82.94% Planning/Inspections 341,930 24,886 235,657 106,273 68.92% Streets 884,150 46,800 480,202 403,948 54.31% Recreation-Community Srvs 3,000 0 3,000 0 100.00% Parks 385,590 38,150 268,760 116,830 69.70% Cemetery 9,880 0 1,171 8,709 11.85% Transfers 271,080 36,791 294,332 (23,252) 108.58% Cable TV 45,000 21,354 21,354 23,646 47.45% Contingencies 54,720 0 5,500 49,220 10.05% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 4.384.370 354.558 2.845.556 1.538.814 64.90% Area Fire Service Fund 735,710 51,814 302,974 432,736 41.18% Dock Fu nd 166,170 4,737 65,096 101,074 39.17% Capital Projects 26,310 295,668 1,029,739 (1,003,429) TIF 1-2 Downtown Mound 0 1,499 107,552 (107,552) TIF 1-3 MHR 0 1,262,142 1,263,373 (1,263,373) Water Fund 779,440 178,357 609,333 170,107 78.18% Sewer Fund 1,227,150 85,251 852,663 374,487 69.48% Liquor Fund 584,370 60,186 349,981 234,389 59.89% Recycling Fund 168,160 1,062 93,084 75,076 55.35% Storm Water Utility 126,630 30,396 79,626 47,004 62.88% Exp-2005 09~07~2005 Gino -2817- CITY OF MOUND BUDGET REVENUE REPORT Aug. 2005 66.67% GENERAL FUND Taxes Business Licenses Non-Business Licenses/Permits Intergovernmental Charges for Services Court Fines Street Lighting Fee Franchise Fees G.O. Equipment Certificates Charges to Other Dpts Other Revenue Aug. 2005 YTD BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE 2,402 210 20 950 265 000 375 630 262 850 105 000 105 000 352 000 270 000 11 000 38,600 PERCENT VARIANCE RECEIVE~D 0 1,469,899 (932,311) 61.19% 225 18,745 (2,205) 89.47% 8,195 98,238 (166,762) 37.07% 0 78,577 (297,053) 20.92% 6,702 60,330 (202,520) 22.95% 4,608 56,994 (48,006) 54.28% 9,008 71,376 : (33,624) 67.98% 7,515 228,447 (123,553) 64.90% 0 274,476 4,476 101.66% 919 7,268 (3,732) 66.07% 9._~9 19,565 ~19.035) 50.69% TOTAL REVENUE 4.208.240 37,271 2.383.915 ~1,824.325) 56.65% FIRE FUND DOCK FUND MOUND HRA WATER FUND SEWER FUND LIQUOR FUND RECYCLING FUND STORM WATER UTILITY 780,710 47,380 589,368 (191,342) 75.49% 132,740 61 127,686 (5,054) 96.19% 136,124 1,156 79,382 (56,742) 58.32% 770,000 63,094 452,015 (317,985) 58.70% 1,322,200 117,850 835,132 (487,068) 63.16% 2,200,000 200,398 1,381,719 (818,281) 62.81% 143,800 8,984 80,751 (63,049) 56.16% 136,320 12,686 100,893 (35,427) 74.01% 09~07~2005 rev2005 Gino -2818- General Fund $1,677,743 CDBG 0 Area Fire Protection Services 410,213 Dock 186,657 Mound HRA 13,668 G.O. Equip. Certf. 2004 - C 151,285 G.O. Equip. Certf. 2005 - C 3,294 G.O. Bonds 2001 - C 64,264 Commerce Place TIF (334,852) G.O. Bonds 2003 - C TIF 1-2 258,196 G.O. Bonds 2001. A 14,248 G.O. Bonds 2003 -A 273,388 G.O. Bonds 2004. A 167,130 G.O. Bonds 2005 - A 51,436 Taxable G.O. TIF Bonds 2005 - D 319,688 HRA Lease Rev Bonds (526,255) Capital Improvement 2,040,040 MSA 387,214 Sealcoat 24,705 CDB 6,123 Downtown TIF 1-2 (13,469) Downtown TIF 1-3 MH 2,251,772 HRA Public Safety Bldg 29,331 Water 4,575,803 Sewer 1,315,234 Liquor Store (501,094) Recycling (7,109) Storm Water 890,558 Fire Relief (62,391) Note: The above schedule shows the combined cash and investment balances by fund for the months Indicated as recorded in the General Ledger. The balances do not reflect receivable, payables, authorized transfers, encumbered funds, or dedicated/reserved resources, etc. Only some accrued transactions are reflected. Investment income will be distributed to the funds at the end of the year and is not Included. A long and complete process is followed to record all transactions, before we close the books, at the end of the year. In addition, the audit from the independent auditor is performed and an official Comprehensive Report will be presented to the City Council and made available to interested parties. In no way this schedule is intended to represent balances of funds available for spending. 09~07~2005 CashReportCouncil Gino -2819-