The URL can be used to link to this page

1990-04-24 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - 4-/24/90 ��1 Pg. Pg Pg. Pg. P9• OF 1MMA � Cm M ount 1 losso A a4 �1•Df Y CITY COUNCIL r MEET ING. }JyV L YR r L 1990 4 1112 -1114 { 1. P%um OF ALLEGIANCE t. 9. APPMW 1 D'I'ES OF THE APRIL 10, 1990 RBWLAR I= AML 17, 1990 COIMI'i"1'Ea OF �� 1NZLENT iP'pILITY •ILLS +1i .. 1 T M OF A CQliffim )NAL i T � U&SOMAL OUTDOOR 2260 . MB" VROPO4ED *no SNOKI POLICY VH wmm 4* OF 1989 FINANCIAL AUDIT - OF ANDO him AND SICK �a g . i t ONGURST TO REOO=ISE AN M STINJCT TO ALUM tFICATte� toy LOTS 1 & 2 Y et 4r, a, PI #30- 117 -23 22 0094 X4113# Amt so") Pg. Pg Pg. Pg. P9• Pg. 1115 - 1137 8. OW n. 90 -944s REQUEST POR SIDEYWI SSTIrCK VAIANCS FOR LOTS 5 i 6, BLOCK 18, SBAGYNOOD POINT, PID #13- 117 -24 12 0085 (5041 CRESTVIEM RD) Pg. 1138 -1136 9. *= •Q. 90-909= APPROVAL OF ST_- NDARDS COMPATIBLE NITS CITY CODES FOR PAUL NESENSON, 2197 CARDINAL TANS 10. CUM N0.49 -4048 REQUEST TO AMEND RESOLUTION #09 -41, MURK i STACEY GOLDSERG, 4053 ISLANDVIEN DRS Pg. 1137 -1150 11. CUB NO. 90 -91 =8 REQUEST TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NON - CONFORMING SETBACKS TO ALLAN STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION FOR TATS 13 i 14, BLOCK 9 DREAMNOOD, PID #13- 117 -24 24 0005 Pg. 1151 -1166 12. CUB 909 90 -9138 REQUEST FOR FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOT 1, BLACK 2, BATDORF "S FIRST ADDITION (2700 NESTEDGE BLVD) Pg. 1167 -1176 13. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT PAGE 1083 Y. a` w 1044 -1Qd11 1092 -1093 1094 -110# 1106 -1111 1112 -1114 Pg. 1115 - 1137 8. OW n. 90 -944s REQUEST POR SIDEYWI SSTIrCK VAIANCS FOR LOTS 5 i 6, BLOCK 18, SBAGYNOOD POINT, PID #13- 117 -24 12 0085 (5041 CRESTVIEM RD) Pg. 1138 -1136 9. *= •Q. 90-909= APPROVAL OF ST_- NDARDS COMPATIBLE NITS CITY CODES FOR PAUL NESENSON, 2197 CARDINAL TANS 10. CUM N0.49 -4048 REQUEST TO AMEND RESOLUTION #09 -41, MURK i STACEY GOLDSERG, 4053 ISLANDVIEN DRS Pg. 1137 -1150 11. CUB NO. 90 -91 =8 REQUEST TO RECOGNIZE EXISTING NON - CONFORMING SETBACKS TO ALLAN STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION FOR TATS 13 i 14, BLOCK 9 DREAMNOOD, PID #13- 117 -24 24 0005 Pg. 1151 -1166 12. CUB 909 90 -9138 REQUEST FOR FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOT 1, BLACK 2, BATDORF "S FIRST ADDITION (2700 NESTEDGE BLVD) Pg. 1167 -1176 13. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT PAGE 1083 X4. APPROVAL OF 1990 PARKS PROGRAM AND APPROVAL OF 1990 LIFEGUARD AGREEMENT WITH COMMUNITY SERVICES RECEDED BY THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION Pg. 11" -sto 15. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION TO MAKE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MOUND BAY PARK DEPOT AND TO DIRECT STAFF TO DEVELOP A DETAILED SITE PLAN FOR MOUND BAY PARK 16. PROPOSED RESOLUTION: EARTH DAY 1990 GREEN PLEDGE 17. PROPOSED RESOLUTION - USE OF FERTILIZERS, HERBICIDES AND PESTICIDES ON CITY PROPERTY 18. APPROVAL OF GARDEN LEASE FOR HERMAN SCHRUPP 19. PETITION FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT FROM RESIDENTS AIA)W WEST BDGB BLVD. NORTH OF THE DAKOTA RAIL RAILROAD TRACKS SOUTH OF CCUNTY ROAD 15 20. REQUEST FROM SHORELINE DRIVE BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE - JIM VENTURA, CHAIRPERSON 21. RESOLUTION TO SET ASIDE SURPLUS FUNDS, NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DEBT SERVICE FUND FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AND MAJOR PROJECTS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 22. DISCUSSION: LMCD LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN, SECTION 1 -3, (BRING PLAN WITH YOU TO MEETING) 23. LICENSE RENEWALS 24. PAYMENT OF BILL 25. PROCLAMATION - WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK 26. MCZLLINSOUB A. Financial Report for March 1990 as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director B. Planning Commission Minutes of April 9, 1990 C. IMCD Mailings D. Park and Open Space Commission Minutes of April 12, 1990 E. EEMINDSRs Dedication of new Nature Conservation Area on Drummond Rd. April 24th at 6:30 PM x ; Pg. 1189 -1197 Pg. 1198 -1201 Pg. 1202 -1204 Pg. 1205 Pg. 1206 -1207 Pg. 1208 -1209 Pg. 1210 Pg. 1211 -1212 Pg. 1213 -1226 Pg. 1227 Pg. 1228 -1229 Pg. 1230 -1235 Pg. 1236 -1240 Pg. 1241 -1248 Pg. 1249 PAGE 1084 xsy , rt �yq;a Apr 1 0, low Mum -MDR err! COW=& - APRIL, 1990 T!* City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Kinnesata, met in r "lar session on Tuesday, April 10, 1990, in the Council fir• at 5341 Maywood (toad, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmombers Andrea Ahrens, Lis Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also pmt were: City Manager Rdward J. Sbukle, Jr., City Clerk Tram C lark, City Attorne Curt Pearso City Planner Mark Xo"I r, Building Official Jan Bertrand and the following in rested citise Pahl Jesenson, Paul Lents, No. Scott Wright, RAW Hagen, John Ringstrae, and Juan Luna. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 1.0 Halton idle by Jensen seconded by Abreas to approve the siautoa of the Marob 27, 1990, Regular Keating with a **Creation to the time of the Board of Review on may e, 1900, at 7100 P.M. no 7830 P.M. The vote was unanimously is favo Motion carried. 1.1 The City Planner explained the modification that the Planning Commission has recommended. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There were no comments. The Mayor closed the public hearing. The City Attorney suggested changing the following language change in the definition section of the proposed ordinance: "Stich facilities must be located on land owned• -by nn er the g=rshig or control of the City of Mound." The Council agreed. Mayor Smith and Councilmember Ahrens questioned whether the Bickmann site on Lynwood Blvd. was being considered again for outdoor storage. The City Planner stated that at this point the Planning Commission was not cons`.dering that site. The remainder bY41l of the Council stated they were not considering the Bicknam .� site. The City Planner explained that the ordinance as proposed does not include a specific site, Just the B -1 sons. Since tb* storage in Lost Lake was not allowed in any zone of this City this would be the first step to allow it in the 5 sane under a Conditional Use Permit. n 11OTION made by Johmsem to table this item. The motion diN tot look of a seosa4. Councilmember Ahrens stated she does not feel the Planning Commission completed the tasks the Council asked for, which were: 1. Provide a recommendation to the City Council on the k possibility of establishing outdoor storage areas to the east and west of the city hall building. 2. Regardless of the Commission's recommendation in item #i #+ above, provide a recommended zoning modification to accommodate the outdoor storage at the city hall site. The City Planner explained that what has been recommended is the first step in this package to resolve the outdoor storage issue. If after this ordinance is passed, the Council would desire to move the storage to the city hall situ, that site would need to be rezoned to B -1 from R -1. Councilmember Jensen pointed out that the east of city hall site is not large enough to handle all the materials needed by the city and stored at Lost Lake. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following: ORDINANCE #43 -1990 AN ORDINANCE 381WLIBRING A DSTINITION FOR "MLICLY OWNED OUTDOOR $TORUGN" AND AMENDING BECTION 23.625.3 OF TEE NOOND CODN OF ORDINANCES TO ADD PUELICLY 0 0 OUTDOOR STORAGE AS A CONDITIONAL DBE IN TEN CENTRAL again$$ (3-1) NONE The vote was three in favor with Ahrens and Smith voting nay. Motion defeated. An amendment to the Zoning ordinance requires a 4 /5th vote for passage. Councilmember Johnson asked the City Manager to make list of all one acre or above sites in the B -1 zone as a possible solution to the outdoor storage problem in Lost Lake. 0 rVI*5 1.2 T 46 April 10, 1990 The City Planner reviewed the applicant's request and stated that due to additional information being submitted by the applicant, the Staff is now recosmending approval of the variance. The City Attorney stated that he agreed with the Staff and would suggest that the Council orgrant the variance conditioned upon the City Attosney, the Building Official, the City Planner and the lioant bsin4 able to work out a not of standards compatible with city codes and bring them back in written fora to the next regular council greeting for approval. The applicant agreed. Mgm "as by Sbit1, seconded by Jo`mson to grant the variance X"Most of the applicant (CUO #90 -9092 pool wesensel, 2197 cardinal Lane) ooaditioaea +poi Staff and the applicant being able to work out a sot of standards compatible with city oedos and bring them back is written fora to the April 20th meeting for consideration. The vote was utsaimowly in favor. Motion carried. The City Attorney stated that he thinks the Council should review the language and percentage in Section 23.404(2) of the Zoning Code for revisions. The Council agreed to look at this at the next Consittee of the Mole minting. 1.3 CotdltM !S ON M APPLICATION #90 -6225. 5311 BAYMOOD WORMS DRIVR There were no comments by the City Council, except they would like to know what the final disposition of these cases are. CpMMENTS AM S1DMBSTIONS PROM CITISENS PRSSeNT There were none. /08(5 110 UM ma0e by Jensen, seconded by Jessea to set April 24, 1990, for a public hearing to consider a permit to allow temporary outdoor retail sales at 2250 Comeorce Blvd., Case 90 -910. fte vote was unanimously in favor. !lotion carried. 1.4 y 'r •i April 10, 1"0 Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: t USOLOTION i90 -42 0 mr- on TO "Nam $124 7200 = OOM ilN mace CaPIUL FUM SO Ta COWNWAs MAN OiN! als"03 !BD to OT an TM#I! FUG The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. - �� Y / " . �•. . E "r� j { T W. W .r' Y� a $) jII ENNIS y f �� . 1-77-7 Scott Wright, representing the Citizens Concerned for Dutch Lake, presented their plan to attack the Eurasian water Milfoil in the lake. tm stated the DNR will provide money for half the cost up to $1,000. They have collected about $1,500 from property owners around Dutch Lake. They have bids ranging from $1,460 to $1,896 to treat the 5 to 8 acres of Dutch Lake affected. Minnetrista has approved a c* tribution of $3:3.00 toward the treatment. The citizens are asking that Mound also contribute $333.00. NOTION made by Johnson second" by Jeasea to authorise voatsibuting $333.00 toward the treatment of Dutch Lake to oombat surasian water Milfoil. !De vote wan aaaaimouslt In favor. Motion carried. The City Manager reported that 3 bids were received. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Allied Blacktop Co. Astech Corporation $29,450.00 $29,899.50 $37,200.00 The Engineer and Staff recommend the low bid of Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 190 -43 RESOLUTION APPROVING TSS LOW DID OF BITUMINOOS ROADWAYS, INC. IN TEE AMOUNT OF $29,450.00 FOR THE 1990 SEALCOAT PROJECT 47 April 10, 1990 1 • • /0r7 V ; 4S 1!!Q 1.7 21!r!!!' Cff BILLS 11altOr made by Johnson, seconded by Jessen to s atborise the papaant of bills as pseeemted on the pro -list Is the arsest of $145,947610, Obas fonds are available. It roll call vote was Ineals"Oly in favor. Motion oarried. A. Dapart■•nt !toad Monthly Reports for March 1990. B. UICD Reprosentative•s Monthly Report for March 1990. C. LMCD Mailings. D. Planning 0=nission Minutes of March 26,1990. E. Rat League of Minnesota Cities 1990 Annual Conference to be held in Duluth, June 12 -15, 1990. F. MMINDERS Farewell Reception for Jan Bertrand, Friday, April 20, 1990, beginning at 4:30 PM, American Legion, Mound. a. Letter from an attorney representing the National Marine Manufacturers hasociation (NMMA) relating to the LMCD's proposed ordinance regulating personal watercraft. N. Memo from League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) RE: LMC Legislative Policy Committees. If you are interested in serving on one of their committees, please let Fran know as soon as possible. 1. Economic Development Commission Minutes of March 29, 1990. J. Councilmembers Jessen and Johnson updated the Council on the upcoming Earth Day and Earth Week activities. The full schedule will be in The Laker this week. t1 IXON made by !Ahrens, seconded by Jessen to djourn at 5840 P.M. The vote was unanimously is favor. not a carried. Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager 47 April 10, 1990 J., y M MIn0lMM - F 1 0 18 OF !MM ADLM - BAIL 17, 1994 Members present: Mayor Steve Smith, Andres Ahrens, Phyllis Jensen, Lis Jensen and Skip Johnson. Absent: none. Also present: City Manager Sd Sbukle, City Ugimar John Carron, Jim Ventura from the Shoreline Beautification Committee, Keith Rennerfeldt from Hennepin County, David Aradorfer of Ara dort r and Associates and Tom Reese Mound's IMCD representative. Us meeting was called to order at 6 :30 PM. Jib Visntur• esst�ed • amt ales MUoselise $ M in y amd i !b "U s CtNmi ittos is asking the cities of Mound, spring Park and Orono to participate in this matching funds program to encourage plantings along shoreline Drive. The Committee is asking each of the cities to dedicate $3000 or $. 000, but feels that a minimum of $2000 per city is essential for he program to have any impact. Those matching funds would be available to residential or commercial landowners abutting Shoreline Drive. He presented other basic rules of the program and than answered questions from the Council and the City Manager. The City Manager pointed out that he had discussed this proposal with Curt Pearson, city attorney, and it was the opinion of the city attorney that this type of a program could not be done. The primary reason for this opinion was the fact that the majority of the properties along Shoreline Drive are private and it would be against state law for the City to provide public monies to locate plants.on private property. Curt did suggest, however, that under Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 429, that a project could be started and easements could be obtained and the plantings could be done through an assessment type basis. The Council asked several different questions that were questions to be directed to the city attorney. It was recommended that this item be placed on the April 24, 1990 agenda for discussion with the city attorney. Keith Rennarfeldt, Hennepin County Assessor's Office, was present to review information relating to the upcoming Board of Review to be held May 8th, at 7 PM. Keith provided data regarding the sales of properties during 1989 and other information. John Cameron, city engineer and Ed Shukle, city manager, discussed with the Council the never - ending issue of public works material storage. At the April 10, 1990, regular meeting, the Council did not pass a proposed zoning amendment which would have allowed outdoor storage of materials in a B -1 zone. It was requested by the Council that at the Committee of the Whole meeting, a list of properties of one acre or more, located in the B -1 zone should be provided to discuss possible options dealing with the storage of public works materials. After considerable discussion, it was recommended that the B -1 property located • • /Prof 1 , ; . ... k 4 adjacent to lake Langdon behind the old Mound state bank be Investigated for possible storage. This item will be discuss" again at the next Committee of the Mole meeting, ray 15th. h petition from residents north of the railroad tracks and south of County Road 15 on Mestedge Blvd. was briefly discussed. The residents in the Mound and Minnetrista arras on this street have petitioned the Council to blacktop a portion of the Nestedge Blvd. roadway. Costs from 1996, which were calculated to do such a project as well as additional public improvements wore reviewed. It ws that this item be placed an the April 94th for ofi vial action. The Commit intends to accept the petition and direct the city ang nsror to update the feasibility reports that wens prepared in 1986. Proposed improvements to the Mound Be yy Park Depot and the park were discussed. Ed Shukle presented infos�aation that the Depot needs to be improved for safety and building cods reasons. As presented information that had been developed by Steve Jontsen, architect from McCombs F=* Roos, regarding improvements to the Depot which are estimated at 880, 700. Be specifically addressed the deck area, which the building official has doomed to be unusable. In addition, he reviewed a concept plan developed by the city planner at the direction of the Park and Open Space Commission. The plan involves expanded parking and swimming beach Press, shifting the playground area to another location and moving the volleyball court. In addition, walkways would also be located within the park. Estimated cost to do both the Depot imiprovements and the Mound Bay Park improvements are $243,000. The Park and Open Space Commission has discussed this and has recommended to the Council that the Depot be improved at the estimated cost of 880,700 and to direct the city planner to develop a more detailed site plan for Mound Bay Park. The Council discussed this and suggested that the item be placed on the April 24th agenda. Tom Reese, LMCD representative, and David Arndorfer of Andorfer and Associates, were present to highlight the draft of the LMCD Lake Management Plan. Following their remarks, it was suggested that each meeting of the Council between now and the public hearing date of June 6, 1990, that the item be discussed, so many sections per meeting, so that comments could be provided to the LMCD and submitted on to the Metropolitan Council. The compost site for Eurasian Milfoil was discussed. City Manager, Ed Shukle had indicated that at the April 10th meeting the Council had briefly discussed this and they had suggested that it be on the Committee of the Whole agenda. It was the opinion of the Council that although the Milfoil is a major issue, which the City is involved in in trying to eradicate, the City of Mound does not have adequate space to store permanent compost from the Milfoil removal project. Therefore, they suggested that the city manager contact the LMCD to indicate that 2 /000 ,.n e k ti s they would not be ,, ble to provide a site. In aidition, they asked the city tanager to advise the LXCD that a property owner in Mound tight be interested in the material. There being no other business, the meting adjourned at 10 :10 !M. The next rioting of the Comittee of the Whole is sabeduled for Tuesday, May 15, 1990 6:30 PM. allpectftlly submitted, City Manager ES :ls • • AM / 3 33 4860 141 4390 931 ob 4392 t41 33 4312 $72 33 4570 063 33 4630 601 33 4630 812 33 4690 303 33 4720 303 33 4750 123 33 4750 241 33 4750 542 33 4810 062 33 4840 513 14 4840 691 4840901 33 4842 424 33 4847 932 33 4870 541 33 5000 216 33 5000 271 33 $030 061- 33 5300 151 33 $450 065 33 5450 121 33 5480 064 33 $510 391 0 $540 544 33 5600 062 Del inquat Now t ad MW = 8>.17 118.20 146.26 171.41 203.21 97.26 136.54 112.21. 158.72 89.72 260.99 141.59 111.60 294.24 296.62 134.82 150.71 174.81 162.94 123.35 166.66 116.35 173.26 133.34 98.28 129.60 121.78 70.00 117.95 /oq#% �lll � 1Nt t43 l i� NI0,903 3! 423. 33 Mo *I 33 5954 721 38 4M .068 33 6080 061 33 1204 511 33 6204 661 33 6204 751 33 6204 003 33 6106 121 33 U30 397 33 6320 033 33 6350 091 336470 121 33 6470 183 S1if.40 221.23 85.71 91.87 87.00 211.32. 85.16 95.08 174.37 129.21 135.08 132.68 113.56 161.52 179.14 135.68 103.89 105.12 84.63 90.26 139.51 156.71 74.16 167.20 146.85 115.60 $7 6 8. 3" a Delinquent Water and Sewer 4/18/94 33 4060 241 J.P. Kinneberg Pd. S 87.17 2628 Tyrone Ln. 33 4390 931 Morgan & Ward 118.20 4400 Wilshire Blvd. k' 33 4391! 241 Dan Brunette 146.26 4519 Wilshire Blvd. 33 4392 572 John Zambori Pd. 171.41 4681 Wilshire Blvd. 33 4570 063 Guy Griffin 203.21 4512 Montgomery Rd. R 33 4630 601 Roberta Nelson 97.26 4739 Bedford Rd. 33 4630 812 Dave Ladner Pd. 136.54 4854 Bedford Rd. 33 4690 303 J. Steinwand 112.21 4785 Richmond Rd. :6 33 4720 303 Dianne Williams Pd. 158.72 4543 Dorchester Rd. 33 4760 123 Cohen Ressler Pd. 89.72 4515 Manchester Rd. 33 4760 241 Bonnie Engle 260.99 4531 Manchester Rd. 33 4750 542 Patrick Foley 141.59 4633 Manchester Rd. 33 4810 062 Kathleen Anderson Pd. 111.60 2925 Stratford Ln. � ' 33 4840 513 Teresa Torvik 294.24 3073 Tuxedo Blvd. 33 4840 691 Robert Wagstrom Pd. 296.62 3113 Tuxedo Blvd. 33 4840 901 Richard Gelhaye 134.82 3201 Tuxedo Blvd. 33 4842 424 Robert Magers Pd. 150.71 4535 Tuxedo Blvd. 33 4642 932 Klaus Weiler Pd. 174.81 4861 Tuxedo Blvd. 33 4870 541 Jerry Olsen 162.94 4873 Cumberland Rd. 33 5000 216 Dean Kolden Pd 123.35 4445 Radnor Rd. 33 5000 271 Thomas Dulebohn Pd. 166.66 4448 Radnor Rd. 33 5030 063 Rick Bosma Pd. 116.35 4428 Lamberton Rd. 33 5300 151 Steve Kokales 173.26 3121 Donald Dr. 33 5450 065 Linda Cabralus 133.34 4821 Lanark Rd. 33 5450 121 Eve Bedell Pd. 98.28 4828 Lanark Rd. 33 5480 064 Michael Kleyela Pd.$64.80 129.60 3107 Argyle Ln. 33 5510 391 Hugh Brown Pd 121.78 3113 Alexander Ln. 33 5540 544 Vassar & Boie Pd. 70.00 3081 Dundee Ln. 33 5600 062 Ken Linquist 1:7.95 4831 Dale Rd. Pd.183 70 $161.40 4876 Leslie Rd . 33 68 633 David Clarke 33 $870 781 Stanley Gersich s 33 5570 841 Devlon Gleason n X16 931 .w Gary Schleif 221.23 3054 Brighton Blvd. , 85.71 3066 Brighton Blvd. 91.87 3069 Brighton Blvd. why, Pd. 87:00 4951-Brighton Blvd. ' 33 5858 033 Leonard'.Wogsland Pd. =100.00. 3046 Brighton Com aon *` 85.16 5139 Windsor Rd. ay 95.08 5214 Dr=wd Rd. 174.37 5137 Haver Rd. 129.21 5135 Henovar Rd. 135.08 460 Aberdeen $W. hh 132.68 4721 Aberdeen 1Ct. 113.56 4748 Mordgn 9d. ; 161.52 4767 Aberdeen Rd 119.14 3235 Dexter 135.65 3201 JWWM t jAl" y 103.89 'M isl e" , Vi& A DP f "` 105.18 4" 111tn4 84.63 4856 Island Visit or. �P 90.26 4877 Island View or. r4 139.51 4925 island View or. �:. 156.71 5317 Piper Rd., 74.16 3219 Gladstone Ln. 167.20 5123 Waterbury Rd. 146.85 - 5227 Phelps Rd. 115.60 5239 Phelps Rd. $7cbx.53 $3559.13 33 5900 343 Glenn Helena Pd - 33 $030 607 C.Nordmeier Pd. ' 33 6iHfiE1 572 John Sharp Pd. $25.00 33 SW 901 Eric Bergl Pd. 33 5990152 Joe Frolich Pd. 33 SM 423 Charles Hilbelink Pd. n. 5900 00" Blaine Fiv Pd. 13 5990 7$1 Joe SC rs 3 6060 068 David Harrison 33.E 061 Keith Jqhnson Pd. 33 6M 511 Douglas; Nelson 33 6204 661 R.E.Skifiner Pd. " ' 62tNi 761 Jinn Thompson F 13 6701 903 Ralph Grac :a Pd. 33 6206 121 Holmes Empson Pd. 33 6230 397 Robert Carlin 33 6320 033 Gary Lyons Pd. 33 6350 091 Barbara Miller Pd. pd33 6470 121 Jerome Longley Pd. 33 6470 183 Sue Westmark Pd. 85.16 5139 Windsor Rd. ay 95.08 5214 Dr=wd Rd. 174.37 5137 Haver Rd. 129.21 5135 Henovar Rd. 135.08 460 Aberdeen $W. hh 132.68 4721 Aberdeen 1Ct. 113.56 4748 Mordgn 9d. ; 161.52 4767 Aberdeen Rd 119.14 3235 Dexter 135.65 3201 JWWM t jAl" y 103.89 'M isl e" , Vi& A DP f "` 105.18 4" 111tn4 84.63 4856 Island Visit or. �P 90.26 4877 Island View or. r4 139.51 4925 island View or. �:. 156.71 5317 Piper Rd., 74.16 3219 Gladstone Ln. 167.20 5123 Waterbury Rd. 146.85 - 5227 Phelps Rd. 115.60 5239 Phelps Rd. $7cbx.53 $3559.13 " RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FAR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SALES AND STORAGE AREA FOR LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES INCLUDING LUMCER AND WOOD PRODUCTS AND x ROCK AND STONE PRODUCTS AT 2250 COMMERCE BOULEVARD, ' PID NUMBER 13- 117 -24 -33 0077. MNEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on April 24, IOO pursuant to the Mound Code of Ordinances to consider the #,ou*40 of a conditional use permit for establishment of a sales #torepe area for landscaping supplies including lumber and wood k is and rock and stone products at 2250 Commerce Boulevard; '%PWi WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard; and VNEREAS, storage of lumber and wood products and rock and stone products is allowed in the Industrial (I -1) zone by tirnAitional use . permit in accordance with Section 23.640.3 of the flobad Code of Ordinances; and- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and do** recommend approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that the conditional use permit for the Wtblishment of a sales and storage area for landscaping materials it 2260 Commerce Boulevard is here t4llowing conditions: by granted subject to the 1. The structure which is temporary shall not be erected prior to April 1st of each year and shall be removed by September 30th of each year. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 p .m. 3. The structure shall be self supporting and shall comply with all applicable building codes. 4. All products offered for sale shall be confined to the structure and enclosed area. All signage shall comply with the Mound Sign Code. S. 6. ~ 4. Proposed Resolution Case No. 90 -310 Page Z The structure and outdoor sales area shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. The structure shall be built in conformance with the plans attached (Exhibit A). • CITY of MOUND T ptl1 472 -1101 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Cm OF Now CASE NO. 90 -910 1-Ma MINNESOTA NOTICE OF A PUBLIC REARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE MMIT TO ALLOW TWORART SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES AT 2130 CON99RCI BLVD. ROTICR IB REMEB? GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound. Minnesota, w11 •set in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, April 24, 1990 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow Temporary Seasonal Outdoor Retail Sales at 2230 Cosmerce Blvd., legally described as follows: Lots 38 and 39, "Koehler's Addition to Mound" Lake Minnetonka, and; That part of the Northerly 96 feet of the Burlington Northern Railroad right - of-way running through the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5th Principal Meridian, which lies between the Southerly extension of the East line of Lots 38, "Koehler's Addition to Mound" Lake Minnetonka, and a line drawn parallel with and 317 feet West, measured at right angles to, said East line of Lot 38 and its Southerly extension. PID f13- 117 -24 -33 0077. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. 2AM._ . c UdA k Francene C. Clark, City Clerk • logdl Mailed to abutting property owners within 350' radius on April 12, 1990. Published In "The Laker" on April 9, 1990. An pull opportunity Employer that OOa$ not 018or mmata on the basis Of rata, Color, WWII Origin, or handicapped status in tna admission r access to, or iraairrm,nt or ,mploymant in, its programs and activities. NINUTES OF A NEETINS OF THE NMI NO ADVISORY PLANNING COIMUSSION April 9. 19" d . City Planner, Mark Koehler, reviewed the appilconts request to have an accessory outdoor retail sales area at the rear of the Coast to Coast store. Koehler explained that this parcel Is split between two zoning districts, the building is In the 1 -1 (industrial) zone, and the parking lot is in the B-1 (Central Business) zone. Koehler commented that the Planning Commission may want to address the B -1 /i -1 zoning Issue at a subsequent meetgng, and If appropriate, Initlate proceedings to rezone the 1 -1 portion of the property to 9-1. Koehler informed the Commission that since the hardware store building is presently zoned 1 -1, this request cannot be processed as an accessory outdoor retell sales area. However, can be processed under Section 23.640.3 of the 1 -1 provisions which al- lows the storage of various products by conditional use permit. • The City Planner recommended approval of the conditional use per- mit since the proposed outdoor sales area Is appropriate for Its location and will provide additional retell products for Mound residents, subject to the following: 1. The structure shall not be erected prior to April 1 of each year and must be removed by September 30th of each year. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to 800 p.m. 3. The structure shall be self supporting and shalt comply with all applicable building codes. 4. Ali products offered for sale shall be confined to the structure and enclosed area. All signage shall comply with the Mound Sign Code. S. The structure and outdoor sales area shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. Mueller questioned if corrugated flberglas panels should be con- sidered an acceptable material for the Central Business District. It was determined that for this type of use, it 1s the only feasible material to use. Some commissioners commented that they are confident the proposed area will be kept clean and will look nice. MOTION made by Welland, seconded by Thal to approve staff recommendation for approval of the conditionai use permit. Motion carried unanimously. y / /Y l This case will be heard at a public hearing by the City Council V7 on April 24, 1990. PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission and Staff FROM: Mark Koegl er, C i t y Planner DATE: April 4, 1990 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit APPLICANT: Bruce C. Dodds (Mound Family Hardware, Inc.) CASE NUMBER: 90 -910 VHS FILE NUMBER: 90- 310- A10 -ZO LOCATION: 2250 Commerce Boulevard EXISTING ZONING: I -1 and B -1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial BACKGROUND: Coast to Coast was one of the applicants who initiated the zoning code modification to allow "Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales" as a conditional use in the B -1 zone. They now have applied for conditional use permit approval to construct an accessory outdoor retail sales area at the rear of their building. Before reviewing the details of this request, comments on the zoning of the subject parcel are appropriate. The Coast to Coast site as well as the adjacent buildings are split between two zoning districts, Central Business (B -1) and Light Industrial (I -1). The parking areas are located within the B -1 zone and the building is in the I -1 zone. This information became available after the zoning modification allowing accessory outdoor retail sales areas was approved. Since the hardware store building is presently zoned I -1, this request can not be processed as an accessory outdoor retail sales area. Fortunately, Section 23.640.3 of the I -1 provisions of the zoning code allow the storage of various products by conditional use {permit. Therefore, this application is being processed as a conditional use permit request under Section 23.640.3 of the Mound Code of Ordinances. The Planning Commission may want to address the B -1 /I -1 zoning issue at a subsequent meeting and if appropriate, initiate proceedings to rezone the I -1 portion of the property to B -1. /0Q` SOSO Harbor Lane North Bidg.11, Suit* 1104 Minneapolis, MN. 55447 -2175 612/553 -1060 t Planning Report April 4, 1990 Page 2 The Coast to Coast proposal calls for the construction of a seasonal sales area to be open from April 1st through the end of September. Hours of operation of the area would generally coincide with store hours; 7:30 AM to 8:30 PM. The proposed sales area consists of a wooden frame structure covered with corrugated fiberglass panels. The seasonal structure rests on an existing concrete pad at the rear of the building. According to the building code, such structures must be self supporting and can not rely on the permanent building for structural rigidity. When the zoning code was modified to allow temporary outdoor seasonal sales, the issue of aesthetics was discussed by the Planning Commission. At that time, it was generally agreed that all conditional use permit proposals need to be examined on a site by site basis. The subject proposal does not have high visibility although it is visible from portions of Lynwood Boulevard. Additionally, it lies adjacent to the industrial property that is used for petroleum product storage. Because of these factors, the overall appearance of this structure is perhaps less important than a similar structure located along Shoreline Boulevard or Commerce Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION: The applicant's proposed outdoor sales area is appropriate for its location and will provide additional retail products for Mound residents. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 1. The structure is shall not be erected prior to April 1st of each year and must be removed by September 30th of each year. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:30 AM to 8:30 PM. 3. The structure shall be self supporting and shall comply with all applicable building codes. 4. All products offered for sale shall be confined to the structure and enclosed area. All signage shall comply with the Mound Sign Code. 5. The structure and outdoor sales area shall be maintained in a neat and orderly manner at all times. 0 1041 • crrti of NIOUND CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND MINNESOTA 55364 (b Q� 472 -1155 CASE NO. 90 -910 NOTICE OF AN INFORMAL PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES AT 2250 COMMERCE BLVD. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, April 9, 1990 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow Temporary Seasonal Outdoor Retail Sales at 2250 Commerce Blvd., legally described as follows: • Lots 38 and 39, "Koehler's Addition to Mound" Lake Minnetonka, and; That part of the Northerly 96 feet of the Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way running through the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 13, Township 117 North, Range 24 West of the 5th is Principal Meridian, which lies between the Southerly extension of the East line of Lots 38, "Koehler's Addition to Mound" Lake Minnetonka, and a line drawn parallel with and 317 feet West, measured at right angles to, said East line of Lot 38 and its Southerly extension. PID #13- 117 -24 -33 0077. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. �'41u rrc,M- Francene C. Clark, City Clerk �- I] Mailed to abutting property owners within 350' radius on March 23, 1990. ,a9� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLANNING i ZONING CO"HISSION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subject Property Aup 8 y0 Lot Part of Lots 38 6 39 and . . . (see attached) Block - Addition Koehler's Addition to Mound ( leasehold P I D NO. 13- 117 -24 -33 0017 Owner's Name 44/it1i,y► J*/A esu AR-4 eoAe0 Day Phone Owner's Address es )ft 60-"75 BL 116 App 1 i cant' s Name (if other than owner ) 3/euec e DODt25' A4 0 0 i.✓ Addres say7Sy C ige-C ?c d�Ci _ Day Phone 0 /7 Z- o�7 6 Existing Use of Property: 11W1e E _f C • Zoning District Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, c9nditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? n If yes. list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolut on number(s) (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. i consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant's Signature Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recommendation Date 4 -9 -90 Council Action: 0 Reso lution No. Date 4 -24 -90 CITY OF MOUND PART I I i Case No. -= Date F i t ad Z I -CA 0 Fee !200.00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLANNING i ZONING CO"HISSION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subject Property Aup 8 y0 Lot Part of Lots 38 6 39 and . . . (see attached) Block - Addition Koehler's Addition to Mound ( leasehold P I D NO. 13- 117 -24 -33 0017 Owner's Name 44/it1i,y► J*/A esu AR-4 eoAe0 Day Phone Owner's Address es )ft 60-"75 BL 116 App 1 i cant' s Name (if other than owner ) 3/euec e DODt25' A4 0 0 i.✓ Addres say7Sy C ige-C ?c d�Ci _ Day Phone 0 /7 Z- o�7 6 Existing Use of Property: 11W1e E _f C • Zoning District Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, c9nditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? n If yes. list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolut on number(s) (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. i consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant's Signature Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recommendation Date 4 -9 -90 Council Action: 0 Reso lution No. Date 4 -24 -90 T goa w ftLt TEA1 J4�.Cifi�y 3� i�G 7r+ $E' OWSrWe,& 72' E�� sf �Vli J3civ6 Ufy Mgt L7E� To 6ETNf/t �► AuCMaR� b �D CpN *t,SETE S�A4 +�GrMrM�•t .rYtd•QS onl S " I�RkjN £iwDf� Secrso !�y Mao &' � x�,1� �•oF ,�,+,�ECy SEG,rtE� w��r� .Sc,�w s 1of le . fIiN�E #.Nisc. W9 6•trEo lb � $."em IRN £1 j tunOvAOLE by 04 Yq #&"A !L F414M it 'y X44 ? O'vt4 l Y << ►oa. ENd ve-1w FRoKT W P&A- DiTIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION ke Two Case No. A. All information requested below, a site plan as described to Part 11. and a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for th4 completion of the construction must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Type of development for which a Conditional Use Permit is requested: 1. Conditional Use ( spec i fy) s j ,EA7?_ 5,64_56, L. 0o 7 - cbo f__ FE7A1L 5ALE5 2. Current Zoning and Designation in the future Land Use Plan for Mound: :rl I C. Development Schedule: 1. A development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the ,pro- posed development.' 2. Estimated cost of the projects $ ', o U D. Density (for residential developments only): 1. Number of structures: 2. Dwelling units per structures a. number per unit type: efficiency I bedroom 2 bedroom 3 bedroom 3. Lot area per dwelling unit: 4. Total lot area: E. Effects of the Proposed Use: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. r FoPL F Un✓n L _ .o /f r- I ! IC J Y Y 114 "fi V 1 t o ll... .,.i M y W Mao 'I p HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNES�JT'�.�► �_ *ANN. IL • - � .fin .'.Y7.'. . ! _.a • � • . Ja 1r�. ', ' .. • � ," r . 7 � fICAlrlt - TitEATEO LUPWWiQ o O 4 �• �txy ��cl� •r Lywweed goolt,ro�d �..;� loll bR� �� a �yl�,vr f To - "� f= I 1 �' r, 1 V L _ � � l _ L . 1 \ .� i -1 �.. L� I ! 1 � �� Lo 1 1 4. L� loeG - rZ • o��L6RT�D IC �w 31 IF �� 9 Ert GtMS �i4N[ o ° ,o .,j.4 I _ k� • atG�s � O y.tiJ�'� � 0 RAi{.wAY NORTH �.'� .1 �1. 3 f M� tNGTON S '1� y 7 . O i LyNVIOOD gLVa �ouRs ep� N I dv �Fo " _ $ EXjsTING aLd& /so' N T a J 6nr,K w f►LL Top rANEt NiN�F� 'o oftA 4.W# H6 WL a.trvo 7b so?'fbv" oAAJ £f. fC^VoALE by ua ►rq # S o-AAA !L if si F ROM w- w 4 �(t f i 10 rte.. +�7I9�1 IFN ve-lw FRoKT WR" .. r •� do 1666 IR-ML P. YE+IF % am SM ..�.; ��++ "s -M�y is For If, r wwa , kx: , �,� j6i&uy�p j:RpN) L:3 • RsSOLUTION NO. to - Rs80LUTION APPROVING A "NO SMOKING" POLICY FOR TRR CITY OF MOUND FACILITIES •12RRAB, the demand for no smoking in the workplace has been evident since 1975, when the Minnesota State Legislature created the Minnesota Clean Indoor Act; and WR$R1A8, the Surgeon General C. 8vertt Roop, in 19x6, issued a report which clearly indicated that smokers and non- smokers cannot be separated effectively in the same air space; and !=2R2AS, the City Manager has researched the feasibility of implementing a "No Smoking" policy for the City of Mound facilities; and WANSBA8, the City Manager has looked at a number of communities that have adopted "No Smoking" policies that range from total bans to smoking in designated areas; and MRM the City Manager is recommending that smoking be banned from the following City facilities: City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road Public Works facility, 5468 Lynwood Blvd Fire Station, 2415 Wilshire Blvd Island Park Garage, 4843 Manchester Road Municipal Liquor Store, 2324 Wilshire Blvd (leased facility) and WNNRfAS, the City Manager is recommending that employees, while they are operating and occupying City owned vehicles and equipment, will be prohibited from smoking; and /(04/ 1 L , VURM, the City of Mound is committed to providing i and visitors with a safe, healthy and clean working =rena roaunt, and is committed to maintaining this type of and minimising exposure to health hazards that are eftbed by smoking. MOw, lsssstOSS, as XT R3SOLV3D, that the Mound City Council hereby adopts the attached "No Smoking" policy as IIII and re - ended by the City Manaqei in its entirety. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor ut: City Clerk tL_J //0? 2 ME MORANDUM DATE: March 22, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council `. FROM: Ed Shukle, City Manager SUBJECT: Proposed "No Smoking Policy" - Some Minor Changes After the Committee of the Whole Meeting held March 20, 1990 1 have made some minor changes in the proposed no smoking policy. 1 am recommending that the Mound Bay Park Depot, 5801 Bartlett Blvd., and the island Park Hall, 4845 Manchester Road be deleted from the city facilities list in terms of the no smoking policy. Both of these facilities are rented facilities that are not con- sidered to be formal work places like the other facilities listed. Also, 1 have added another exception under the "Exceptions" provision. Annually the Fire Department conducts a fish fry and two bingo events. 1 am recommending that the policy be waived for those three events only, at the Mound Fire Station. Other than those above recommended changes, the policy that was discussed March 20th remains the same. Attached is a resolution approving the no smoking policy as presented with these new changes. If you have any questions, please contact me. ES :pJ • por GRAFT GRAFT 0 CITY OF MOUND Proposed "No Smoking" Policy - Ellminatina Smoking in the Work Place PURPOSE: The City of Mound is committed to providing employees and visitors with a safe, healthy, and clean working environment. The City Is committed to maintaining this type of environment and minimizing exposure to health hazards that are caused by smoking. Therefore, it is the intent of this policy to eliminate smoking ,within City of Mound facilities. QEFINITION: "Smoking" is defined as carrying or possessing any "lighted" tobacco product including cigars, cigarettes, and pipes. POLIC Tobacco use is not permitted by anyone at anytime while utilizing Cltv of Mound facilities and equipment. These facilities are listed under the heading of "Applicability" below. APPLICABILITY: This policy applies to all persons while utilizing the following city facilities: City Nall, 5341 Maywood Road Public Works Facility, 5468 Lynwood Blvd. Fire Station, 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Island Park Garage, 4843 Manchester Road Municipal Liquor Store, 2324 Wilshire Blvd. (leased facility) in addition, this policy applies to all persons while they are operating and occupying city owned vehicles and other equipment. EFFECTIVE DATE: This policy becomes effective at 12:01 a.m., September I, 1990. EXCEPTIONS: Any person who wishes to use tobacco may do so outdoors on the grounds of city facilitles. Employees are allowed to smoke out- doors during regularly scheduled break times. If employees are f/ o" scheduled to work outside of regular work hours, i.e. attendance at an advisory commission or city council meeting, etc.• employees can smoke outdoors during the break times of those specific meetings. Police statistics indicate that persons who are being interviewed by police during an interrogation process, are more likely to provide needed information that the police are seeking when they feel relaxed or comfortable. Therefore, if the police department is interviewing or interrogating a person(s) and the person(s) must smoke during the interview, that person(s) may do so within the secure Interview room only. Three events held annually at the Mound Fire Station are: fish fry and two bingo nights. The no smoking policy Is waived for these three events only at the Mound Fire Station. Employees who are found in non - compliance with this policy will be sub,Ject to disciplinary procedures as outlined in the City's Collective Bargaining Agreements and Administrative Code. Ail visitors will be instructed not to smoke in the aforemen- tioned facilities. The responsibility of reminding visitors of the smoking prohibition will fall upon city employees who are conducting visits with the person(s). Visitors who violate this pollcy will be asked to extinguish the smoking material; if the visitor continues to smoke he /she will be asked to leave the city facility. Services will not be provided to visitors who violate this policy. Minnesota Statutes 609.605 and 609.681 state that persons who smoke in a "no smoking" area are guilty of a misdemeanor. SMOKING CEP - W I ON PMRAM: The City of Mound will provide the opportunity for employees to quit smoking. The city will send employees who smoke to a cessa- tion program. Employees will pay the enrollment fee, but will be eligible for reimbursement based upon the followings Ng SMOKING REI MBURSEMENT after six months 50% of cost after one year remaining 50% of cost In addition, employees will be allowed to attend such a program during regular work hours, if necessary. / //D OTIER PROCEDURES: i The CIty of Mound will post "NO SMOKING" signs in appropriate locations at the aforementioned facilities. Outdoor ash receptacles will be placed in appropriate locations on the Grounds of the aforementioned facilities. • • 11 C,1" N of MC)UIND April 24, 1990 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ED SHUKLE s CITY MANAGER 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472 -1155 RE: PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED NO SMOKING POLICY IN ALL CITY BUILDINGS I thought it would be helpful for you to have some additional in- formation with regard to the proposed no smoking policy. In developing this policy, I researched it quite thoroughly and made contact with the League of Minnesota Cities, Research Department. The League sent me a packet full of information which has sample policies from cities all over the United States. Specifically, there was information from cities and counties provided to me by the League. I took this information and developed the policy based on my observations of how smokers have affected non - smokers in relationship to the work place. I looked at the policy in terms of all city buildings so that the policy would be fair to all employees and visitors who use City facilities. In addition, City vehicles and other types of City equipment are to a certain extent an extension of the office or department that the employee works out of. I felt it was important that these areas be also be free of smoking. The policy also provides for a designated area (outside on the grounds) for those who want to smoke, but only during regularly scheduled work breaks. This policy was not developed on a whim, nor is it intended to harm or injure anyone. As the basic purpose states: "The City of Mound is committed to providing employees and visitors with a safe, healthy, and clean working environment. The City is committed to maintaining this type of environment and minimizing exposure to health hazards that are caused by smoking. Therefore, it is the intent of this policy to eliminate smoking within the City of Mound facilities." The policy was developed through research. A great deal of the policy was developed through information secured from the City of Chaska and the City of Woodbury. Recently, I received additional Memo to Mayor and City Council April 24, 1990 information from the League of Minnesota Cities about other cities who have adopted no smoking policies as total bans. Those bans have expanded to counties around the state as well as municipal utilities i.e., electric, gas, etc. Cities and counties that I have found recently are Hutchinson, Shakopee, Madelia, Grand Rapids (ice arena), Northfield, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Fillmore County, Olmsted County, Beltrami County, Fairbault County, Washington County, Cass County. It is interesting to note that the League of Minnesota Cities had a partial ban on smoking until recently when they adopted a policy for total ban in the League offices. I also contacted Steve Jantzen, McCombs Frank Roos, to see if he could get some information for me with regard to installing a ventilation system in a room in each of the city buildings affected by the policy. He worked with Ken Dowell, EXE and Associates, our mechanical engineer on the City Hall project, to see what could be done and the estimated cost of doing the ventilation system. Steve assumed that we would be looking at a 150 square foot room. To do just an exhaust fan would be approximately $1500. To completely ventilate the room, i.e., supplying air, heating and cooling it and exhausting it to the outside, would be approximately 1;3500. These are basically technical type costs which does not include removing any walls or redesigning rooms or offices. To do additional work beyond the technical system, would require additional funds. Based on this information, if you took $3500 and multiplied it by 5, because there are 5 building affected, the cost would be $17,500. One of these buildings, i.e., the liquor store, is basically two rooms - a display area and a stock room. You would have to be creative in trying to divide up the square footage area to allow for a smoking room. I indicated previously that we would be able to achieve a 105 reduction in workers compensation rates if less than 105 of the fire fighters and police officers smoked. This would amount to approximately $3000 per year based on the 1990 premium. This would be an annual reduction to the preen um. The proposed policy certainly assists in trying to achieve the 105 reduction in workers compensation premium. It is obvious to you, since I have developed the policy, where I stand with the policy. I believe the City must take a leadership role on this issue. To change it further, i.e., suggesting designated areas within ouildings is ludicrous and costly. ES:ls F AsDo, Aeno & Eicg Ca11TIPWO PUMLIC ACCOUNTANTS 1060 NORTHLAND PLAZA. 3800 WWr BOth STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 666,91 TELEPHONE 612. 836.9080 FAX 612 -888 -3820 MellbW of AI WiM omm k unwlm of MOW P bso Asoolrnoat MWAMo Oralano Honorable Mayor and City Council Mound, Minnesota Dear Council Members: We have audited the financial statements of the City of Mound, Minnesota for the year ended December 31, 1989 and have issued our report dated April S, 1990. We have not performed any substantive auditing procedures subsequent to that date. As part of our audit, we have made a study and evaluation of the City's system of internal accounting control to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards. The purpose of our study and evaluation was to determine the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the firnncial statements. • Our study and evaluation made for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph would not necessarily disclose all material weaknesses in the system. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the system of internal accounting control of the City of Mound taken as a whole. The following is a listing of other items that warrant your review: Financial Position and Results of Operations Certificate of Achievement The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Mound for its comprehensive annual financial report for the year ended December 31, 1988. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. The City's entire staff is to be commended for their assistance with the successful completion of this project. The 1989 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report will also be submitted for review. Capital Improvements Debt Service Fund In 1990 all remaining bonds outstanding payable from the Capital Improvements Debt Service Fund were retired. The remaining assets of this debt service fund are available for any public purpose. ///A Page Two ABoo. AM • RM "R ceRTlileO Pusm Accou mot The Council should review the financial position of all debt service funds and establish policies for the use of future excess funds which may become available. These are resources which will be available to the City only one -time. General Fund The unreserved fund balance in the General Fund decreased $132,836 during 1989 and has decreased $202,688 the past two years. The unreserved fund balance at year end represents 24.75 percent of 1989 expenditures. The fund balance must remain sufficient to provide working capital and absorb revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures. Sewer and Water Utility Funds A comparison of the past four years of sewer and water utility operations is as follows: Liquor Fund A comparison of the past two years of liquor fund operations is as follows: 1989 1988 Percent Percent Amount of Sales Amount of Sales Gross profit $208 475 23.37% $199 994 22.84% Operating expenses 159 749 17.90 153 948 17.58 Operating income $ 48 726 5.47% $ 46 046 5.26% Transfer for sealcoating ; 49 749 5.58% $ 40 000 4.57% //13 1989 1988 1987 1986 Water Fund Charges for services $324 799 $354 532 $290 284 $271 413 Operating income (loss) 20 303 122 750 59 384 6 080 Net income (loss) 37 975 127 773 78 091 (2 494) Sewer Fund Charges for services 570 953 573 973 555 735 530 016 Operating income (loss) (5 397) 20 935 (53 336) (20 087) Net income 82 293 91 903 19 489 55 256 Liquor Fund A comparison of the past two years of liquor fund operations is as follows: 1989 1988 Percent Percent Amount of Sales Amount of Sales Gross profit $208 475 23.37% $199 994 22.84% Operating expenses 159 749 17.90 153 948 17.58 Operating income $ 48 726 5.47% $ 46 046 5.26% Transfer for sealcoating ; 49 749 5.58% $ 40 000 4.57% //13 Page Three • 4Ja. Xh; This report is intended solely for the use of management and council. The t comments and recommendations in the report are purely constructive in nature and should be read in this context. Our audit would not necessarily disclos. all weaknesses in the system because it was based on selected tests of the accounting records and related date. If you have any questions or wish to discuss any of the items contained in this letter, please feel free to contact us at your convenience. We wish to tit you for the continued opportunity to be of service and for the courtesy a cooperation extended to us by your staff. Sincerely, ABDO, ABDO 6 EICK Certified Public Accountants Gary Groen, CPA • //IV' PROPOSED RESOLUTION . Case No. 90 -907 RESOLUTION NO. 90- RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE AN EXISTING NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS FOR LOTS I i 2. BLOCK 4. DEVON, PID #30- 117 -23 -22 -0088, (4535 ABERDEEN ROAD). PIGZ CASE NO. 90 -907 Y WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to recog- nixe an existing nonconforming rear yard setback of 4.13 feet to the principal building to allow construction of a 24' x 28' two t° story addition with a tuckunder garage for Lots 1 i 2, Block 49 Devon, PID #30- 117 -23 -22 0088; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R -3 Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code requires a 30 foot front yard setback to the east, a 20 foot front yard setback to the north, a 6 foot side yard setback to the south, and a 15 foot rear yard setback to the west; and WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that al- teratlons may be made to a building containing a lawful, noncom- forming residential property when the alterations will improve 1 0 the livability thereof, but the alteration may not increase the number of units; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval due to topography, to afford the owner reasonable use of their land, and to allow a conforming minimum floor area for the structure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby authorize the existing nonconforming setback to the west rear property line of 4.13 feet for the property located at Lots 1 3 2, Block 4, Devon, PiD #30 -117- 24 -22 0088. 2. The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violations and authorizes the alteration set forth below, Pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remain, as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. • /115 r • "/0 f {Ad. z V C PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. Psge Two b� b�y 3. It Is determined that the livability of the res t d+ ft'I&I property w111 be Improved by the authorization of thb ftl , lowing alterations to a nonconforming use of the property t0 *M afford the owner reasonable use of his land. a. To construct a 24' x 28' two story addition with a tuckunder garage upon the condition the addi wIl have conforming setback*. 4. Th1s verionce is granted for the foliowing lepriIy descrr16W propertyt This variance shall be recorded with the County Records" the Registrar of Titles In Hennepin County pursuant to 1410► nesota State Statute, Section 462.3593: Subdivision (4) y This shall be considered a restriction on how this property ;y ma be used. 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of flitAO this resolution with Hennepin County and paying aili#p for such recording. The building permit shall not be iosubd until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. r • "/0 �,, F r y� y MINUTES Of A MEETING Of THE MOM AOV I SORY R AMNi I NO COMN l SS I ON April 9 1990 b. Outiding Official. Jan Bertrandt reviewed the applicants request for a rear yard setback varlance of 10.87 feet on the existing structure to allow construction of a conforming two story addl- tion with a tuckunder garage. The exlsting structure has 504 square feet of floor area which does not meet the m inimum area required f o r a single family dwelling. Staff recommended ap- proval o f the two story tuckunder garage and living space addi- tion of 24' x 28•, and to recognize the existing rear yard set- back of 4.14 feet to the west l l i n e for the existing struc- ture. This approval was recommended due to topography, and to allow a conforming minimum floor area for the structure. Mel land confirmed that the addition would not Intensify the ex- feting nonconforming setback. NOTION ■sde by Smith seconded by Met land to approve staff recoswendst Mon for approve 1. Motion carr ied un- antaousl This case will be heard by the City Council on April 24, 1990. �J • l //I • • CITY (A NIOl TND h. %%f. , , ' 4 " X64 CASE NO. 90 -907 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff [ FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official 6 DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of April 9, 1990 CASE NO.: 90 -907 APPLICANT: Nancy Soderman LOCATION: 4535 Aberdeen Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1 and 2, Block 4, Devon PID 030- 117 -23 -22 0088 SUBJECT: Side Yard Setback Variance EXISTING ZONING: R -3 One and Two Family Residential PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to add a two car garage with living space above. The existing framed dwelling is 4.13 feet to the rear property line. COMMENTS: The R -3 zoning district requires 6,000 square feet of lot area, a 30 foot front yard setback to Island View Drive, a 20 foot front yard setback to Aberdeen Road for lots of record, a 6 foot side yard setback to the south lot line, and a 15 foot rear yard setback to the west property line. The structure is 18 x 28 feet with a floor area of 504 square feet. The garage and living space addition will allow a conforming floor area. The property slopes from the west side of the lot toward Island View Drive with the existing driveway approach from the Island View Drive east side of the lot. RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation is to approve the two story tuck - under garage and living space addition of 24 x 28 feet, and recognize the existing rear yard setback of 4.13 feet to the west lot line for the existing structure due to topography and to al- low a conforming minimum floor area for the structure. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be referred to the City Council on April 24, 1990. I<<?' 2 r 13= 1 CITY Of MOlm PART 11 Case No. Date F t 1 ed 3 Fee #50.00 VARIANCE 6PPLICATION PLANNING ti ZONING COMMISSION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subject Property L \5 1: 6 S 1� C1 Lot \ 'k a Block Add i t i on 'Z 'Or. P 1 D No . 3 0 - \V 1 - a3 - cQ - M g d Owner's Name §! C AJ QQ&2- ' WA.Y\ Day Phone L A - O b O Owner's Address qi'Q c Applicant's Name (if other than owner) Address �� Day Phone Existing Use of Property: Zoning District Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance. c tt I ona l use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? a If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolu number(s) (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) i certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. i consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this appllcat•ton by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of Inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant's Signature Date + 1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recorrinendat i on Date Council Action : _ // Resolution No. _ Date O RIANCE APPLICATION Case No. q 1. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (X), No ( ). if no, specify each non - conforming use: 2. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it Is located? Yes ( ), No X). If no, specify each non - conforming use: WQAt S. � b a_ �S ar\l L4A;l ' ) 3. Which unique physical characterlstfcs of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) sub- surface ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify 4. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted? Yes ()Q, No ( ). If yes, explain a\�.1 - \V gk S. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ). If yes, explain • //ML0 VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No. Q 0 - 1Q 0 6. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No (X. If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? 7. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area, bulk, and setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and writ- ten explanation. a. F%RT III J. SIT PLAN INFORMATION: Al supporting documents such as sketch plans, attachments. etc., must be submitted in 8 -1 /2"x11" size. If larger drawings are submitted. one must be 8- 1 /2 "xil ". and 15 larger size SoPies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure, a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show- ing the following informations I. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s), building(s), driveways) /street access, off - street parking, and utilities. 2. Existing and proposed elevations. 3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines; principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. 4. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. 5. Indicate "north" compass direction. 6. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. 0 /111P Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? qt, -qO r 7 CF�:F2'TI F� J r`�•li� C)v -S,'tJRVF;N, Scale: V - 30' FtaR NtkNrY LVNN S0[)ERf•1.AN o Denotes iron monument Bearings shown are assumed Area Lot. 1 - 5563.61 Sq Ft Area Lot 2 - 3200 Sq Ft , Q ABERDEEN ROAD MAN x9a.p0 - - 9VMMAR /LL NOILES IN ROCKWALL EAST �•M i AVCK fflETANLL #a mmm I„ /.;:''t' v $ LOT t LOT / J` 4t I a! f — IlI • .. // �� flSt.01D1 : � � •� pot LV .I 4 4.1 - • M � p I�KELE ✓?914Y�� 91f7. EV AO,g i' -40- - -42.6- WEST Z2 d.rr td / d I a 000 X DENOTES EXISMG EL E SEACH MARK: 7010 NrO, A►• /NTSRSEC1VW (000.0! MOTES AWOSEO ELEV Ar CLYAESr. I MLAW VArWA*E ---«- AENOTES SWA1E ARA/NAGE A VO. ELEK + was# PROPOSED WAS PLOOR ELEY. • 951.00 LOWEST FLOOR ELEK + V$JJe 1 hereby certify that this is a t.ruf and correct, : epreseritation of a survey of t hr boundar i eS. of : lots I and 2, Block 4, Lm%on. a-c:ordina to the plat thereof on f i le or ui record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. Subject to minerals and mineral rights reserved by the State of Minnesota: (as to i.ot 1 ) It also shows the location of all visible enrroachmt:rjts, if any, from or said land. As surveyed by me or under my direct supervision this th day of December. 1966. 1• . L n� c /k S H rte t rrc L E aw oplaas o.uvui�apo8 � � 1 r s� • � . � �1 JIL all I . . sum ants me ; od b � . NI L Ni: C o +r comet GLOM wale none - - -- . • ■■■r vIr mm =man ftx 0 • o ".■@ --,"O ~MOOI4 me um SECTION B -B .'ACCESS ROOK 1MMd 1■1 w sum asoo Colm SOW ■III p ■■ - am • M O.C. ■1m ■M# • r O d p Q A O a o 2 O • TYPICAL G ARAGE DOOR L I • 69 7 Li • 6 //UP ,• � ' �, • el 11 q �► .� � _ 9 !� . _ � - :. �3, „�!'- or .:. Tv . 9 i . ::4 :V to to i t .ice _ • �� 19 !. %.. � - I� 1 � •, y „ ,f ,• ;ws , l .t rey 1��: ,� :s, w - 4 � s 'g • v. 'U �„ 2- 2a 28 K' q f ,, ; _ J i t, 13 O�►J -� 24 ( 33 23 ,,, I UKEEK 20422 40 1 40 39 d Ae. ?R$)rb 12 C �� I : Is 1T_ {ate ° + ' 1 , Ott ttt�,' N S 1 ° •3 e2 - � if " & 72 fir. 21 QB R©EEi*I 5 4 q 3'i' '• LS - �• - • t 9 i s S s 3 �' f` • �/ C .1 'X� �l. _ i lk \ 2 401 ol 920 1 2r22 - r -41, 4 ' NANOVE r� �� _ Y Ril 4 3 5 do 15 Oa �' 29/1 • - �� -� `%, l \ / t2 ' 1 q S e. �T s% S •�� 4 3 ' t o'' cLl 9 1 (s (A (5 ?� s)(y`� �;� �� - , o as to s Op 13 ISLAND VIEW OR \ =14 %, 'a CITY OF MOUND 1 s s � rI ..s t • 018 PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. 90 -905 RESOLUTION *90- y' RESOLUTION TO CONCUR W * TH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW A SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR LOTS 5 a 6, BLOCK 18, SHADYWOOD POINT, PID 013- 117 -24 -12 OOHS, (5041 CRESTVIEM ROAD) PaZ CASE NO. 90-905 , E WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a side yard setback r � variance of 8.2 feet to the east property line to allow construc- tion of a 24 by 28.3 foot garage addition for Lots 5 a 6, Stock 18, Shadywood Point, PID *13- 117 -24 -12 00851 and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R -1 t Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code4 requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 30 foot front yard setback, and 15 foot rear yard setback, and 10 foot side yard ; setbackst and M> Y WHEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) provides that al- terations may be made to a building containing a 1 awfu 1 . noncom forming residential property when there are parctical dif- f1culties in complying with City Codes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and recommended approval of a 4 foot side yard setback variance to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Counc i 1 of the 1 ' City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: I. The City does hereby authorize a 4 foot side yard setback variance to the east property line for Lots 5 a 6, Block 18, Shadywood Point, PID #13- 117 -24 -12 0085. 2. The City Council authorizes the setback violations and auths,, -izes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Sec- tion 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express un- derstanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. • 018 PROPOSED RESOLUTION CASE NO. 90 -908 Page Two 3. it is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the fol- lowing alterations to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owner reasonable use of his land due to topog- raphy and practical difficulties. M a. To construct a 20 by 28.3 foot garage addition with 180' eaves 6 feet from the east side property line, upon the condition that the garage floor be elevated to allow drainage of water at the driveway toward the public right -of -way. 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lots 5 & 6, Block 18, Shadywood Point, PID #13- 117-24-12 0085. This variance shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Min- nesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 0 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying ail costs for such recording. The building permit shall not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. 1 X40? "INIM or A owlI111110 V � isolAlN1 AHVISIM PLA14111M =1111"NM ,,...' Apr l l O. IOM '' C. . VY111�e sid. Vard sm"MEb. The flul iding Official reviewed the apps le"s rMiNSt t.0,00 3 _ one story 24 x 2O.3 foot image within 1.0 feet to the property line. The required side yard sethesh for thi♦ Is 10 feet* therefore an 8.2 foot varlangs is Mlle r Ig0lrj , The drainage for this 1 c►t wou ld flow 6 % b a l the new adg+lt hr► the property line. therefore, allowing only 1.4 feet drainage. t Staff recoemnnI denial of the 8.2 That side yard IreI -s& as proposed. ilowever. due to the topography of the lot &W the MIME y. figuration of the existing home, doff reso Ora11R1AO i foot olds yard setback. the 4 fc,-t vsrlanee would •1 ow f foot wide attached sere" and provide S feet In which to Nt dro1nave from the lot and dri betw the property 11110 the structureo as well as give the owner the I.f fast see►! o here as shown on his drawings. The applicant. Craig #listenin commented that he osuld 10111141611 4 full concrete driveway to help direct the drainage. Jahn *Avi1;d! 5021 Crestview Road owns the house to the east of tow j%6je t property, and was present to speak on the $saw. Mr. QW" SW" that If he would over add onto his house, he would do so on VIII west side. and therefore Is opposed to the proposed 1.8 het eslta. beck. however. would be in favor of the i foot setback as resser mended by the Building Official. Michael questioned options for placement of the garage. The elevation of the lot and the floor plan of the existing dwelling • were taken into consideration. The applicant commented that an attached garage would make his house appear larger, and would M more aesthetically pleasing In the neighborhood. Kepler Com- mented that practical difficulties, such as the design of the ex- isting house, could be taken under consideration. Mueller suggested a compromise by approving a 4 foot setback to allow a 22 foot wide garage. The length of the eaves were also discussed. Thai suggested that the save on the east side be Cut off to aIIow less Infringement Into the required setback. NOTI wade by Thal. seconded by Voss to approve staff rsooeme dotion for app ow of a 4 feat vorl from the lest /side property line which would allow a i foot side yard setbacks upon the conditi that the eaves be removed on the east olds only. Clapsaddle commented that the eaves should match the rest of the house. Ciopsaddle moved to amend the motion to allow 10 eaves. Mueller seconded. Amendment carried 7 t- 2 (those 1n favor' were CIapsaddIa. Mueller. Welland. Meyers Smith, and Mlchaell those opposed weree Thal and Jensen). Clopsaddle moved to amend the motion to require the following conditions that the garage floor must be elevated to Improve drainage. Mueller seconded. Amend- ment carried unanimously. The amended motion carried g to i (chase In favor wer ee Clapsaddle. Mueller. Welland, Thal. Mayer. Smith. Jensen • and Vossl those opposed worse Michael). Michael commented that there are other alternatives for placement of the garage available. This case wlli be heard by the City Council on April 24, 1990. //30 CASE NO. 90 -908 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff OUJ FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of Apr 1 9, 1990 CASE NO.: 90 -908 APPLICANT: Craig Hietanen LOCATION: 5041 Crestview Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 5 and 6 Block 18, Shadywood Point PID #13- 117 -14 -12 0085 SUBJECT: Side Yard Setback Variance EXISTING ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to add a one story 24 x 28.3 foot garage within 1.8 feet to the east property line. Photographs were taken which will be distributed during the Plan- ning Commission meeting. COMMENTS: The R -I zoning dietrict requires 10,000 square feet of lot area, a 30 foot front yard setback, a 10 foot side yard set- back, and a 15 foot rear yard setback. The property slopes off from Crestview Road toward the south lot Iine with the existing yard actual', oower than the curb line of Crestview Road. The drainage pattern for this proposal has not been indicated on the survey which is attached. The drainage for this lot would flow between the lot Iine and the proposed addition of l.8 feet, and also in front of the home going toward the west and then proceed- ing south into a low marsh area. The proposed garage will have no roof run -off from the 1.8 feet to the east lot line as the ridge will be running northwesterly and southeasterly in direc- tion from the existing home. The save overhang matches the ex- isting overhang of 18 inches as indicated on the blueprints. The overhang would be at the lot line as proposed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend the 8.2 foot side yard setback as proposed. However, due to the topography of the lot and the configuration of the existing home, 1 would recommend granting a 6 foot side yard setback. The 4 foot variance granted would allow a 20 foot wide attached garage and provide 6 feet in which to get the drainage from the lot and driveway between the property line and the structure, as well as give the owner the 1.5 foot eave overhang as shown on the drawings. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be referred to the City Council on April 24, 1990. 1151 r 45D R W 13 & & 3Zq 9?� .. ►- Qk Ty OF MOUND PART 11 Case No. - 1o' Date F 1 1 ad -5 Fee $50.00 VARIANCE APPLICATION PLANNING A ZONING COMMISSION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subject Property 5041 Crestview Road, Mound, MN 55364 Lot 5 and 6 Block 18 Addition Shadywood Point PID No. /3 ')17- 2.4- -009 ' Owner's None Craig Hietanen Day Phone (612) 559 -9111 Owner's Address 5041 Crestview Road, Mound, MN 55364 (612) 472 -0837 Applicant's Name (if other than owner) Address Day Phone �Isting Use of Property: Homestead Zoning District -/ Has an application ever been made for zoning. variance, cogsatlonal use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolu on number(s) (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) 1 certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant's Signatur Date 3/13/90 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recommendation Date ' ' 0 ouncil Actions _ Resolution No. Date VARIANCE APPLICATION 1 . Case No. - lost Does the present use of the property conform to the zoning district in which it is located? Yes specify each non - conforming use: 2 . Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district In which it is located? Yes 004, No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming uses slope and gully across back and west side of lot, city wat and sever lines come into use on vent side. house floor plan is designg to have garage on east side, present tar driveway exsists on east sid 4. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests In the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted? Yes iXX), No ( ). If yes, explain Due to the sale of Lot 4 for the purpose of new home construction by John Guam our house is no longer ce on the prUerty. 5. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ) , No M. If yes, explain • all regulations for (X), No ( ). if not //33 3. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) (XX) topography drainage ( ) soil ( ) sub- surface ( ) too shallow ( XX) shape (XX) others sroc i fy slope and gully across back and west side of lot, city wat and sever lines come into use on vent side. house floor plan is designg to have garage on east side, present tar driveway exsists on east sid 4. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests In the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted? Yes iXX), No ( ). If yes, explain Due to the sale of Lot 4 for the purpose of new home construction by John Guam our house is no longer ce on the prUerty. 5. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ) , No M. If yes, explain • all regulations for (X), No ( ). if not //33 O RIANCE APPLICATION 6. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described In this petition? Yes ( ). No (X$. If no, how many other properties are similarly affected? Many; due to similiar reasons. For example; 1643 Heron Lane and 5101 Woodland Road (see attached photographs). 7. What is the "minimum" modification (variance) from the area, bulk, and setback regulations that will permit you to make reasonable use of your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dimensions and writ- ten explanation. To build an attached garage within two feet of the East lot line as to improve the anpparanee Of the neighborhood by having our vehicles and personal property enclosed and out of sight. And' it will update the style of the home to match the neiahborho_od.__ (See attached drawings.) S. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property In the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? • No, it will be a big approv PART III J. SITE PLAN INFORMATION: All supporting docueents such as sketch plans-0 attachments, etc., must be submitted in 8- 1 /2 "xll" size. If larger drawings are submitted, one must be 8- 1 /2 "xll ". and IS larger size copies must be provided. For each requested zoning variance procedure, a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show- ing the following information: 1. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s), bullding(s), driveways) /street access, off - street parking, and utilities. 2. Existing and proposed elevations. 3. Distance between: building and front, side and ear lot lines; principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. 4. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. 5. Indicate "north" compass direction. 6. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. 113q � 7 t I \rvi a M GENERAL NOTES e Donate iron monument Proposed too of foundation elevation • Denotes crow cNooled in comets Proposed bosom" flew elevation • s MY Denotes erlistina yet elevation Proposed 6aooe floor elewtion • ® Denote$ proposed spot owation �--- Denote• swfoco drolno" BENCMMARK: Dashed Moot lines denotes proposed features Solid contour line denotes •2131inq features L -METRO I M. rc.r ecr•hN fr r IMC Cr reN►1 rn• roe LAND c . a �n /cr �•r /acc NeN M t cr/crviMes y�� 7V c c/ to Wild lwngcr I c� c /lo URVEYORS h woof IM Sta Ic cf fM ffcl N Mir►MCeq. , F i0o z z 2340 Daniel$ Street 27 Lena Lake, Minnesota 55356 3 9� 1IOZS Pk: 475 -1433 DATE RES.no. A • /00 Lot 5 and 6, 01oak 16 sNAIVN000 POINT I acoording to the rdses#" plat thereof, Hennepin County• Minnesota. A Area • 11,512 square foot 9 otion - 1126 5 � . 4 , - � t r' £1 • Q � . 111' 'm c 2 ` 1 tl 11 O 1 1 . Z OI 1 zl 1 VIZ • 1 • ° GI all s ,� � _� � r ^ t � o �� a O h �_' • a �� Air 91 • . � •s '�' ss l °x ,91 L � - r. t �, / '� N11z S � \ y - is , 6� ° • y _ � as 6 j £19► z rf l ap C� q of OZ P n r tz 041 . 000 1 I M I S3A by TO: Mr. Stew Smith stn[: Mart Coldbers pECD APR 17 M DATE: April 12, 1990 SUBJECT: 4853 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE BOATHOUSE Per our April 11 conversation, I would like to review a grievance I have with the hound Planning Ciomm issLon and would very such appreciate your intervention towards amicably solving this dispute. Following is a chronology of the situation. • In March 1989 the Planning Commission approved variances allowing me to remodel my house. They also voted to have me move my boathouse from the Mound commons onto my property. At that ties they were unaware of a sewer easement running through my backyard. • In late March 1 89 the city council approved the resolution. • In early April '89, shortly after gutting my house for the remodeling, the city inspector determined that the footings weren't sound and recommended that the house be demolished and rebuilt iu its entirety. • At the next commission meeting, upon hearing the inspector's recommendation, the commission decided to alter the variances granted three weeks earlier. Their justification was that they were aware of a law that stated that if there were less than 500 of a house's value remaining, the variances were no longer valiQ. • In mid -April I retained the city attorneys from Robbinsdals and Loretto. At a cost of $850 they prepared a letter clarifying the `500" law as applying only in the case of natural disaster. • At the next planning commission meeting no reference was made to the letter, no reference was made regarding their mistake and there was a very strong (and not imagined) disdain towards me. They simply dropped their efforts to alter the variances. • In the Spring of 1990 I turned my attention from the house construction to the boathouse. 01 I discovered that the boathouse was 5 feet longer than was initially believed, raising practical problems for moving the structure. 02 I sat down again with my attorneys to explore the commission's right to insist that I move the boathouse. After researching the issue, a letter was prepared stating • that moving the boathouse cannot be made a condition of granting the particular variances for my property. /161 .2- • is On April 9, 1990 I appeared before the planning commission. Enclosed is a copy of the materials that the city gave these to prepare for that meeting. Their opening remarks were that the Mound city attorney had not read my attorneys' letter. They than dismissed the contents of that letter as "comparing apples to oranges ". Next they dismissed the practical problem of fitting a 19.5 foot boathouse onto a 13.7 foot slice of land. Finally they stated that a deal's a deal and voted that I should move the boathouse. I an upset on two issues: 1. The commission's lack of legal knowledge and failure to consult the city attorney has caused then to overstep their ability to sake accurate decisions. As a result my wallet is lighter by $2000 in legal fees, thus far. 2. I don't feel that they adequately assessed the practical difficulty of moving my boathouse. Instead they focused on their feeling of betrayal that I was violating my end of the original "agreement" by seeking to keep the boathouse in its current location. If I sound a little frantic, well, I am. I'm writing to you in the hope that your input will result in a greater amount of consideration being put forth on this issue before it swings out of control. Thank you very such for your consideration. 'Mark Goldberg /i3* MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE M11 ADV 1 SM PLANN 1 NG COMMISSION April 9. 1990 a. The Buldling Official explained that the applicant. Mr. Goldberg his requested that the following condition, as stated in Resolu- tion #89 -41 be delateds "Relocate boathouse onto applicants Property and grant a 5 foot old@ yard variance and 4 foot rear yard variance." The Building Official Informed the commission that Mr. Goldberg has had a new survey drawn and it shows the boat house being 19.5' longs when the original application was made, it was thought that the boat house was only 14.5' long. The additional S' In length makes it impossible to fit the boat house on the lot between the easement and the lot line as originally proposed. Mr. Goldberg Is rwquesting permission to leave the boat house where it is. Bertrand confirmed that the boat house was constructed after Devon Common$ was platted. Bertrand also suggested that this item be referred to the Park Commis310n for their comments. The attorney's letter from Corrine Heine was discussed. The Building Official commnted that this letter Is like comparing apples to oranges since the attorney referred to an encroachment an private property@ not public property. She stated that public Property/parks and street right -of -ways cannot be obtained through adverse possession as private property can. The City Planner also commented on the attorney's opinion letter and stated, "it does not speak to the merits of this case." MOTION made by Welland, seconded by Voss to recasnend to the City C unc11 that the boat house be removed from public property. Motion carried unanimuusiy. This request will be heard by the City Council on April 24. 1990. • • CSI /131 RECEIVED MAR 9 O 1990 89- B04 Mark 6 Stacey Goldberg 4853 Island View Drive Mound, Minnesota 55364 March 23, 1990 Dear Commissioners and Council Persons: On April 25, 1989 the City Council passed resolution 89.41 containing a condition that required us to stove our boathouse from the city commons area bordering the lake back onto our property (Exhibit 1). The council granted us variances so that we could move the boathouse directly back onto our property. The resolution was based on the boathouse being 14.5 ft in length since there is only 13.7 ft. between the property line and a sewer easement running through our back yard. (See Exhibit 2) After the resolution was passed we discovered that the boathouse is in fact 19.5 ft. long and 10.6 ft. wide. This would cause the boathouse to encroach 5.8 ft, onto the easement. A possible solution would be to turn the boathouse side ways between the • property line and easement. However, since the property is only 40 ft. accross and there is a large tree (3 ft. diameter) on the lot line we would have to place the boathouse such that it would be cutting the lot into two pieces. This solution is even more daunting given the slope of the property in the area. (See Exhibit 3) We would very much appreciate your deleting the condition requiring us to move the boathouse. In addition to the above practical considerations, Mr. David Kennedy and Ms. Corrine Heine (both city attorneys for Minneapolis area suburbs) hava researched the issue and prepared the attached document (Exhibit 4) questioning the city's right to impose this condition. If possible, we would appreciate the opportunity to appear before you so that we can resolve this issue. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, t4yyG berg Mark Goldberg J • 1 140 6 x H,B i T s 68 April 28, 1989 second level of the home with approximate dimen- sions of 20.4 feet by 36.5 feet. Additionally, a deck will be constructed at the southwest corner of level 3 with an approximate dimension of 8 feet by 8 feet as shown on Exhibits 1 and 2. `- Relocate boathouse onto applicants property and grant a 3 foot side yard variance and 4 foot rear yard variance. Upon further condition that the Registered Land Survey included by updated to include the staking of the utility easement. 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: Lot 4, Block 14, Devon PID #25- 117 -24 -11 -0037 This variance shall be recorded with the county re- i corder or the* Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County_ pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, Section 462.3595, Subdivision (4). This shall be considered a restriction on the use of this property. S. The property owner shall have the responsibility for filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. The Certificate of Oc- cupancy shall not be issued until prccf of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember -Jensen and seconded by Mayor Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Ahrens, Jensen, Jessen, Johnson and Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Major Attest: City Clerk /►yi ' � C 11 n 1 u • � . . . •1•• 1o V I EW D ¢O.DO -. Pa • ;4 b N -K I • '• • SEW I A4 , l o b � • • • � ~ . • • t , f . D .Evo w Q .0 . �� C VOtVS LAI<E 'MN��ETOQKA .• �� r'� ^� �'+ ".' � ..r � � `' �� ..y �;Fs r�au t�ouv��' sir ISLAND VIEW DR. CAP 1 s.,w�cs Y I .a �. 7i• • I �r • �1 • •I a.11t.. 2 r • UN DER DEMO L J I0, / ` 1 s7oRy 1' i sn«e ,, s.. NOu sc 1 � � 1 1 O ro.a� � �• O V +` tk o '• —4 _ No. 778237 DEVON ' COM mo m S LAKE MI MWETOWA 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENTS We hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of: Lot 4, Block 14, DEVON, Hennepin County. And of the location of all buildings, If any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me or under my direct supervision this 12th day of Mal 19 Ag.— McCDa+bs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. By: PAUL A. JO Land Surveyor, Minn. Uc. No. 109 8 III McC ombs Frank Roos Associat Inc. �" '`'_ CERTIFICATE OF SURVE' 1505023rd Ave N. E Agin *on 1131) 7S for Plymouth MN 35"7 syneM �. MARK GOLDBERG el2rue•eolo survegon Sj 15 Y y •� 1 tw w or E- Y A � r f � ■ ■ ■ ■ -. 1'1;:� 1 .. ��+ '!► L CO?RRINE A. HEINE AlMroy n Law [?meet Did (612) 3374217 March 20, 1990 LE XNtts 17 sE Mark and Stacey Goldberg 4853 Island View Drive Mound, MN 55364 Re: Boathouse Dear Mr. and Mrs. Goldberg: Mum d: GRAVEN 89 CHARTERED 470 Pill"ry Ce+wer. Mieaapdis. Mi JMM SSM (612)337.9300 You asked our office to advise you regarding a requirement that the City of Mound imposed as a condition to granting a variance for expansion of the house on your property. The requirement was that you move your boathouse (which now encroaches onto property that is owned by the City) so that it is entirely on your proper- ty. State statutes specifically authorize city councils to impose conditions in granting variances. Mirn Stat. S 462.357, subd. 6(2) (1988). It is generally accel that cities have broad discretion in setting conditions. tiowever, that discretion is not unlimited. Variance conditions must be reasonable and must be directly related to the proposed use of the property. We could not locate any Minr to cases that desczibe how "di- rect' the relationship must : betweea the condition and the variance that is being sought. We did locate, however, an Illinois case with facts remarkably similar to yours. Allender v. City of Chicago Zoning Board of Appeals, 381 N.E.2d 4 I App. 1978. A copy of the Allender decision is enclosed. In Allender, the property owner sought a variance from the city's rear yard setback requirements. The city granted the variance on the condition that the owner set back its development from the front yard. The court held that the change to the front of the proposed development did not relate to the variance from the rear yard setback, and therefore the condition was invalid. • If Minnesota courts adopt the same position as the Allender court, then the condition that you move your boathouse would be invalid. The variance that the City granted allows your house to • intrude further on the front and side -yard setracks. Moving the boathouse, which is located at the rear of the lot, does not. I N J5 i x l- 1 5' T Tv Mark Goldberg AO,804 March 20, 1990 v vV Page 2 is alleviate the impact of that variance. Under this analysis, the City, for example, could have required you to screen the front of your house from neighboring properties with a fence or hedge, but it could not require you to make changes to the rear of your property. In conclusion, although there are no Minnesota cases on this point, there is case law in other jurisdictions to support your position that the condition is invalid. We understand that, aside from the legal issue about the validity of the condition, there may be practical difficulties in moving the boathouse to your property. For example, you mentioned that the boathouse would possibly interfere with n sewer easement on the property. We recommend that you attempt to resolve these issues by discussing both your practical and legal concerns with the City Council. We have not attempted to address all the legal issues raised by the location of the boathouse, but only the validity of the variance condition. Please let me know if we can be of further assistance. • Sincerely,. Corrine A. Heine a:gll75101.o02 cc: Dave Kennedy • 11 Av MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 249 1989 I ao Case „• i; i. Devon 1 - OQ YMIA Building Official, Jan Bertrand, updated the Commission on the status of Mr. Goldberg's request. A sewer easement has been dls- covered on the property since the last Planning Commission meet- ing which limits the buildable area on this lot. Therefore staff recom lends that a variance be granted allowing the house to be rebuilt In the same footprint as approved in Resolution 89-33 conditioned upon the boathouse being relocated onto applicants property. The Building Official also recommended a setback varience•be granted for the boathouse due to limited land space. The boathouse was discussed. Welland suggested turning the boathouse sideways so it could be placed on his property with the 4 foot required setback. • Mark Goldberg reviewed the history of his request. He commented that he would like to rebuild the home in the same footprint, twwever he �!04 1 d 1 1 ke to keep the boathouse where _ ft--1 s, due to 4 a,�ck of funds • TF Comm (s s o a or i g i ne 1 v r 1 snce was granted upon the condition that the boathouse be moved within 4 feet of the property line or be removed. MOTION made by Thal, seconded by Clepsaddle, to amend Resolution #89-33 Including the variances listed on page one, items 1, 2, 3, i 4, Including a l l of 1 tom 3 11 sted on page two, and replacing the description of "expansion/ expand" to "new construction /construct." Motion carried with five in favor, three opposed (those in favor: Andersen, Weiland, Thal, Clapsaddle, Michaels those opposed: Smith, Meyer, Jensen). Smith end Jensen noted that their reason for opposing was the boathouse, they feel he should not have to move it within 4-feet of the property line, but it should be moved off the commons. • Meyer opposed because a ee a e ome could be redesigned to be less infringing. 114 This case will be heard by the City Council on April 25. 1989. • Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 1989 Page Three C. Case No. 89 -804: Mark and Stacey Goldberg, 4853 Is Drive, Lot 4. Block 14, Devon, P1D #25- 117 -24- VARIANCE: Nonconforming lot, side yard setback, and front Yard setback, City Planner, Mark Koegler, explained the the applicants request. Mr. Goldberg is seeking variances to expand an existing noncon- forming residential structure. At the present time, the house sits 1.11 feet from Island View Drive, has a side yard setback along the west side of .4 feet and has a total tot area of 4,000 square feet. The Mound Zoning Code requires 6 foot side yard setbacks, a 20 foot front yard setback for the attached garage and 6,000 square feet of lot area. The proposed modifications include expansion of the existing garage and living space.on three different levels. Exhibits 1 and 2 were assembled by staff to outline the applicants proposal. The variances being applied for are: . 1) 5.6' west side yard variance: including a 3.4' x 8.5' ex- pansion of the garage to "square up" the garage space, a 7' extension on the first 1 eve 1 to the west to accommodate a kitchen expansion, a second level cantilever, and a second level deck. 2) 1.6' second level front yard setback variance. 3) Recognize existing 1.11' front yard setback for the garage. 4) 2,000 square foot lot size variance. 5) Construct a conforming lakeside deck on second level. 6) Expand the basement,level northward approximately 12 feet Staff recommends approval of these variances conditioned upon the following: 1) The applicant shall secure all required building permits. 2) • The garage doors will continue to face in an easterly direc- 3) tio. n. The existing boathouse is to be removed from the commons. Discussion The Commission examined each variance individually. They deter- mined the proposed plan for the garage was the most feasibly pos- sible arrangement considering the space available. The garage was reviewed positively s!nce it allows storage and will • eliminate vehicles being stored outside. We Planning Commission Minutes March 13, 1989 Page Four The applicant. Mark Goldberg. spoke on his behalf. Mr. Goldberg submitted a letter signed by three abutting neighbors which states they have reviewed, and approve of his plans for construc- tion which Include the second story addition. and garage and kit- chen extension. The Commission clarified that the neighbor's garage. on the west 9 1de, Is 4' from: the property line and the home sits towards the west side of the lot. Sohns expressed a concern considering the existing nonconform- Kies and expanding outside the existing footprint of the butld- Ing. Expanding outside the footprint would Intensify the noncon- formity. Possible options were discussed and it was detemined that the applicant has already resea rched his alternatives. MOTION srde by Andersen, seconded by Jensen to .•� Ilion Z ndat ion Mot Ion Carr i ad with seven n fay (Andersen, Sohn s, eyer, Jensen, ClePooddle, Smith, and Mlchaei), one apposed (Thal). Thal opposed because he did not feel the deck on the west side was necessary. and did not feel a variance should be granted to allow its construction. This case will be heard by the City Council on March 28, 1989. • I- 0 I � V �� A * I L TILv QuOr�9k . " 0 7 k F! v 12r Ip -1 p IF 4k I MI 2w p� A= j mi WAdftk W-�- T R �� op 4 K - 1 94, , immimw-- ' --- hz-m wt-'Ai PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. 90 -912 0 RESOLUTION #90- RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE EXISTIMG NONOONFLoRMiNG SETBACKS TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL MOOIFICATiONS FOR LOTS 13 i 14, BLOCK 9, OREANWOOO, PID #13- 117 -24 -24 0005 (1749 BLUEO11110 LADE) P&Z CASE ND. 90 -912 WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to recog- nlze existing nonconforming setbacks of 9.1 feet to the rear yard and 5 feet to the side yard to allow construction of a second story addition with a 2 foot overhang for Lots 13 i 14, Block 9, DreamM.-od, PID #13- 117 -24 -24 0005; and WlIENEAS, the subject property is located within the R -2 Single Family Zoning District which according to the City Code rewire* 20 foot front yard setback, a 15 foot rear yard setback, and 6 foot side yard setback to the north and south property linesi and WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) provides that ai- teratlons may be made to a building containing a lawful, noncon- forming residential property when the alterations will improve the l i v a b i l i t y thereof, but the alteration may not Increase the number of unitsi and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval of a 7.9 foot rear yard setback variance to the west and a 1 foot side yard setback variance to the south to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. NOM, THEREFORE, OE iT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby authorize the 7.9 foot rear yard set- back to the west measured from the 2 foot overhang, and the existing nonconforming 1 foot side yard setback to the south from the deck for Lots 13 & 14, Block 9, Dreamwood, PID #13- 117-24-24 0005. 2. The City Council authorizes the setback violations and authorizes the alteration set forth below, pursuant to Sec- tion 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express un- derstanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. • its/ t ;s PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. 90 -912 Page Two 3. it Is determined that the livability of the residential property will be Improved by the authorization of the fol- lowing alterations to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owner reasonable use of his land: a. To construct a second story addition with a 2 foot . overhang projecting towards the rear property line set- back 7.1 feet from the west property line. 4. This Parlance Is granted for the following legally dascribad proler'ty= Lots 13 IL 14, B i ock 9, Dreamwood, P I D #13- 117 -24- 24 0005. This variance shell be recorded with the County Recorder Or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Min- nesota State Statute, Section 462.3595, Subdivision (4). This shall be conslcered a restriction on how this property may be used. 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. The building permit shell not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. • //043- MINUTES Of A MEETIM OF THE NMM ADVISORY R.AMIINB COINIISSION April 9, 1990 e. }k+ Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicants request for a 5.9 fuot rear yard setback variance and a 1 foot side yard tion. The second story addition being proposed will have a two foot overhang projecting towards the northwest property line. The Building Official Informed the commission that they need to determine If the overhang should be considered an "Ornamantei feature," and therefore not be considered an encroachmw* an the yard requirements. Staff recommended approval of the 5.9 foot rear yard setback variance and the I foot side yard setback variance to allow cosi- struction of a second story addition with a 2 foot overhang. The variance should be approved to allow the owner reasonable use Of his lands upon the condition that the 9.1 foot rear yard setback not be reduced more than 2 feet for the cantilever of the second floor additlon. The comrmission questioned. "whet constitutes bulk ?" "Should the setback be measured from the overhang', or from the foundellen well ?" The Building Off Octal commented that when determining setbacks for new construction a surveyor w111 mpowe from the foundation well. Pie 11er commented that since the overhang runs the length of the house• the setback should be measured from the overhang. Meyer commented that since only the corner of the house and overhang encroaches into the setback, the setback shou 1 d be measured from the foundation. NWION made by Smith, seconded by New to approve staff reooswesdetlon to approve a 5.9 foot rear yard vorlanoe and a 1 foot side yard variance. Motion carried S - 4 (towns in favor weres Clapsaddle. Moyer, Vas• Smith, and Michaels those apposed wares Mueller, Welland, Thal, and Jansen). Illchael moved to reconsider the motion. Motion carried 7 - 2 (Those In favor wares Clopsaddle, Mueller.. Welland, Thelr Jensen, Voss, and Michaels those appor -0 wares Meyer and Smith). MOTION made by Clopsaddle, seconded by Weller, to I-F19 end approval of a 7.9 foot rear yard variance and a 1 foot side yard variance to at low construct 1 on of a second story addition with a 2 foot overhang. Motion carried unanimously. 0 Th1s case will be heard by the City Council on Apr 11 24, 1990. 11,53 y$ e CITY of MOUND su 1 MAY*000. 4 MOUMC Mrwasov mm) 4*046 CAM 00. 9O-94 701 Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FitDN s Jan dortrand, Building Off i c i a l DATE s Planning Coas#i ss lon Agenda of Apr11 9 1910 CARE 1! O. a 90 -912 APPL ICOT s Larry A Christine Hawkins LMAfiIONs 1749 Bluebird Lane s.diiAL pKSMI PTiON s Lots 13 4 149 B i ock 9. Oroamwood PID 013 - 117 -24 -24 0009 SUOJECTs Rear Yard Setback Variance to Allow Structural Hod i f l oat i ons EXISTING ZONIOns 01-2 Single Family Residential PRQIs01 AL s The applicant is request 1 ng a rear yard *"back varNnae of 5.9 feet to add a second story onto the sisclsting one story framed home with an attached garage. The second floor wl I I also hew a two foot overhang proJecting towards the northwest property iIno. C MM1EMTS s The R-2 zon 1 ng district requires a lot area of 6 squire feet, a 6 foot side yard setback to the north and south grape. y IIn" and a 20 foot front yard setback to the Bluebird Lane property line. The existing setback of the wood deck at the south /side is approximately 5 feet, the north /side setback is 7.2 feet, the front yard setback Is 21.5 feet, and the rear yard set - bick of 9.1 feet. The structure was built 1n 1970 and since that time the zoning ordinance has evidently changed its definition to define the setbacks In a different manner. The lot has a trapezoid shape and the house Is set at an angle to maximize their view to Harrisons Say. The Zoning Code states, "The following shall not be considered an encroachment on yard requirements under the provisions of 23.400: "ornamentsI futures." Th1s definition has quIto often been in- terpreted to allow an overhang to a building as an ornamental feature as it does not have a wail line from the foundation, provided it dots not extend more then 2 feet into the required yard space. W . / /Sy SW f ZReceossmendstIon CASE 110. 90 - 912 �{ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to approve the 5.9 foot rear yard setback variance and the I foot side yard setback variance to silo" a second floor addition with a 2 foot overhang to the northwest of the property to allow the owner reasonable we of his lands upon the condition that the 9.1 foot rear yard setback not be reduced more than 2 feet for the cantilever of the second floor addition. They abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be referred to the City Council on April 24, 1990. • W 22 G TY OF MOUND PART I I Case No. qMq 12 Date F i 100 - � O Fee 250.00 VARIANCE APPLICATION PLANNING A ZONING COlNit55I0N (Please type or prlr.t the following information.) Address of Subject Property /yf al *e k . , Gr l po✓E Lot s 13 � l 4 e 1 ock 1 Addition _D 0 - f 1 W o 00 P o No. ,S 1 - Z A -?mod Owner' s Name L 4,e& f ay Phone 3 q 7.r 2 ., - Owner's Address 17lf _ BI&C L of A-' - Applicant's Name (if other than owner) Address - - r Day Phone i st i ng Use of Prope C.J� rer P";, fivGE Zoning District R -2 Sic(ei'la%icc-Q Has an application ever been made for zoning, varl tlonal We permit, or other zoning procedure for this property If yet. list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide numberM (Copiers of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) SoaI V /A ? pN 0 1 certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained In any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this applicat.lon by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as My be required by law. � 3 Applicant's Signature ate 22 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recommendation Date e ouncfl Action: Resolution No. _ _ Date- // SAW VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No. q C) A I L - 0 1. Does the present use of the property conform reputations for the zoning district in which It is located es ( , Nc ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: .� 13P_. l; Pvg� 1 j A tS . 2. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback r s for the zoning district in which It Is located? Yes ( ), (3) if not specify each non - conforming uses "1f►E t YrS'tl nIG S7•W CoApuE'e o f MVSE i S 5 f 91 i 4-r I/Se Q c rxs a f SVA oe . 3. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted In that zoni district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil l ) too small ( > drainage ( ) sub- surface • ( ) too shallow ( ) shape others specify _^J S ET 704 c 14 W ; i REMA . -J OAIC0 4AA£0 , wE _ Q �✓ /� TIES :wE eM r4 &0,' w vyA L. 6 O we o N _ygiC �1 �S �1 `� ' N� -��/ ^/ Oil T r oN • A. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property Inter in the land after the Zoning ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ), If yes, explain C7 v 67 S. Was the hardship created relocation of a road? Yes by ( any ). man -made If yes, change, such as the explain C7 v 67 r &RIANCE APPLICATION Case No. q 6. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a vart p r only to the property described In this petition? Yoe, If not how many other properties are siml1ar1y ofteQtMi �iVS./RE O 7N %S 4 �r/,� No Gy oG I�N'Gr++� �► 7. What is the "minlmum" modification (variance) from the area* bulks setback regu 1 at i ons that w 1 1 1 perm i z you to make raaserabi e your land? (Specify, using maps, site plans with dim ten expl anot ton. DfSi AE -HN-C SNr Lc Vp rC� E at w PART III J SITE PLAN INFORMATION: Al I supportfna documents such attachments, etc., mist be I tted In &-112 a � drawings are submitted* one mull bg 8-1112 Fr copies must be Provided. For each requested zoning variance Pe a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarlty eki ing the following information: ..i� Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed= (Lot($ building(s), dr I veway(s) /street access, off - street parki aril. utilities. Existing and proposed elevations. '3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot linch principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. �5. Indicate "north" compass direction. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the • city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. PW S w 10. g 2 2 3ge je - nM.K of: PftJ E �►e. Z N ° s'- R N wt wQ l�0 4. /.S lC t �v �� L �.✓'�" i 8 . / oN1'' ; h, s A vi/v ✓/� M 1 . ✓c &hf A _.. ff SMf►ll 1nl - /'/t -C ;Djaed - rJ j. 11. Will granting of the variance be materially detrimental to ps ##I • the same zone, or to the enforcement / o J f this ordinance? 'A10 S1C � / .4/ '� 5l:�/lCY ,�e5 f: r2 It t C PART III J SITE PLAN INFORMATION: Al I supportfna documents such attachments, etc., mist be I tted In &-112 a � drawings are submitted* one mull bg 8-1112 Fr copies must be Provided. For each requested zoning variance Pe a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarlty eki ing the following information: ..i� Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed= (Lot($ building(s), dr I veway(s) /street access, off - street parki aril. utilities. Existing and proposed elevations. '3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot linch principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. �5. Indicate "north" compass direction. Any additional information as may reasonably be required by the • city staff and applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance. PW 1 sr j 7 -� c oon GENERAL NOTES Down Mar Own"m L�t�O CRirritxf: • O ';* aMle w 'u Lots 13 end 14, Block !, ORUMM M, according to T O we s PIeIYM 1re1 0 tetw " a ' the recorded plot thereof, Rennepin County, funnesota. Osmse Sakes rrslnato (� Down �4 cost Nwfloe ARM . 7533 square feet ♦— cum sNlew P" Mueft/ ptrrece4 features swid sssfyur w 11se. r W64 W9 features M�� 1 % y mu ty Mel we cent a, 00 er nN#r t $10 •, �J�iil RO •ee IN " M wader of diesel wprMMU SU�y�iYdR� set Mf i 3 see a dell Iteeistewd law frnper uMe, 1M 1 et IM 14016 N ".iensee40. ��+ :f•o pa�lsle :heat 7I t, M WWI Lek$, m1mesets $5354 m / N1: 413 -1433 t�rt,_� �0 e[a.No. �aOL� t A - O, >� / *f Oa "IVA313 3qS 4M = a M rn ti Ipp- L� L 0 F,T. I C � Q 11 1 - 2 4 " 00 6l1-+ 1�� Iz il) 0 0 .0 �... R � "� _.Y ��1+I Ri � *R� ff ��i �A J ' ��• � • i •BRIG �� 1 y�: L � ��, f •' 1: '!,' �.� f:' s� �. S �;,`�, ;•� •�• f . y� !1� rb�,�•• .. �i •. {fin 1 � ';�.� � f:�� ''• ': 1 ` ,y y �'w •te d ltq'� �: y: I ..•� �. v • �.. r •ai NI (.��•� .�' ' ./ �` A.;♦ • 0 lA i d I x i I 1 1 9 A IV oftm �Vdu 1' � :y n � • • I �4 t„ ��1► W.-y T v M •l GS- PROPOSED Case No. RESOLUTION r90 -l1S MMLUT1ON TO CONCIM WITH TIE R AMINB COiM ISSION TO MAAM A EDIT YARD IETNACi1 VAR I ANC[ FOR LOT 1 • KM !, 111410111IF'S FIRST AODiTiON, (2700 IRS11Etl!BE BLVD.) PIiwZ CAGE N0. 90-915 WNEREAS, the aMl i cant applied for a 6.4 foot front yrrd 3. sotbaek variance to the west property iine to allow construction of a SaraN ' addition for Lot i, Block t • Satdorf's First x; Additions and the subject property Is located within the 0-1 Sffoip f4ally Zoning District which according to the City Cif re"Ires a tot 0 of 10,000 square feet. 20 foot front yard sotbook# to both the earth and west, a 10 foot side yard setback WW 0 16 foot rear yard setbacks and x I W1iEREAS, Section 23.404, Subdivision (s) provides ttw @I. tWOWOnS My be made to a building containing a lawful, noncon- Abraing residential property when the alterations will imp: - ove the livability thereof. but the alteration may not Increase the nv*er of un t ts, and ;.a WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewsd the request WW does recommend approval to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. Al NM* T1ERF M * BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Count i l of the City of ftu 9 Minnesota, as follows$ i. The City does hereby authorize the 6.4 foot front yard set- back variance to the west for Lot i, Block 2, Bstdorf's First Addition P1D #23- 117 -24 -24 0029. 2. The City Council authorizes the setback violation and aL horizes the alterations set forth below, pursuant to Sec- tion 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express un- derstanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. 3. it is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the fol- lowing alterations to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. • 01041 x a 0 WSMUTION CAS9 wq a a. To construct a 20 by 22 foot one story garage addition 22.6 feet from the west property line. 4. This vari 1s granted for the following legally descri property= Lot 1, Block 2 Batdorf's First Addition 010 092 - 117.24 -24 0021. This variance shait be recorded with the County ptoor►dsr or f" of Titles, In iiMnsp 1 n County hur buw* to 1!i h- n+t , sit ltatu e, Section 462.24, subdtvlslon (1), thi shot l be consldsred a restriction on how this property stry ul�d. 8. Thd property owner Mall have the respons ibl i i ty of fili *1 reooi ut loft with ilennep I n County and paying all costs for such recording. The building permit eteli not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clark. • MOr NINUMS W A NKUIW W THE IOM AMiISM PLAiI IN CONNISSION Ap'1I !• 19N f. Building Official Jan Bertrand, explained the applicants request for a 6.S foot variance to Beachwood Road and a 4.4 foot variance to Mestedge Blvd. The applicant Is proposing to convert the existing tuckunder garage into living space then add a one story, two stall garage to the existing. The Building Official explained to the commission that since the time of the application she has talked with the applicants about the possibility of eliminating the variance to Beachwood Road by moving the garage 6.S feet to the south. The applicants agreed to cor.stro,ct a 22' x 22' garage Instead of the originally proposed 24' x 20' and moving It south to meet the rewired set- • ,back to Beachwood Road. The variance then being requested to the west, Mestedge Blvd., is 6.4 feet. The Building Official also informed the commission that there Is a 15 foot wide boulevard between the curb on Mestedge Blvd. and the applicant's west property line, therefore, the garage would be approximately 38 feet from the driving surface of Mestedge. Staff recomsended approval of the 6.4 foot variance to the west, Mestedge Blvd., to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. The applicant, Jerry Christenson, informed the commission that he may build a 20' wide x 22' deep garage in order to bring the overhang away from the front steps to avoid run -off onto the steps. NOTION made by Welland, seconded by C 1 apsodd 1 e to ap- prove a 6.4 foot front yard setback vorIa we to Mestedge 81vd. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be heard by the City Council on April 24, 1990. • I I tocj CASE NO. 90 -913 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official ' DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of April 9. 1990 CASE NO.: 90 -913 APPLICANT: Jerome M. Christenson LOCATION: 2700 Westedge Blvd. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1. Block 2, Batdorf's First Addition PID #23- 117 -24 -24 0029 SUBJECT: Two Front Yard Setback Variances i s EXISTING ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential P::OPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to attach a one story* two stall garage to the existing structure and convert the existing tuckunder garage into living space. They are proposing to have front yard setbacks to Beachwood Road of 23.5 feet and to Wes- tedge Blvd. of 25.6 feet. COMMENTS: The R -I Single Family District requires a lot area of 10,000 square feet, a 10 foot foot side yard setback to the South. a 15 foot setback to the east /rear yard, and two front yard setbacks of 30 feet to the adjoining public right -of -ways. The lot slopes off from the Beachwood Road right -of -way with the property at the rear of the home approximately 3 feet below the curb. Westedge Blvd. is a 66 foot wide right -of -way with 33 feet paved. The boulevard is approximately 15 feet in width from the property line to the driving surface. The proposed garage would be setback from the driving surface of Westedge Blvd. ap- proximately 40 feet, and would project past all of the homes on Westedge. The stairway to the front entrance of the house Is centered at the structure which would have the garage addition separated from the stairway by the 11 foot projection to the north Beachwood • right -of -way. By allowing Vie conversion of the existing tuck - under garage, we would be creating a 4.4 foot variance to the west and a 6.5 foot variance to the north. It would be impos- sible to set a garage on the south side of the lot due to the 5 11100 Staff Recommendation CASE NO. 90 -913 Page 2 Is foot wide drainage and utility easement and the 19.3 foot exist- I ng setback to the somth . Adding a garage to the east side of the property would make a possible solution to the variance ap- plication, however, the east lot line, defined as the rear yard, would require a 15 foot setback to the lot line which would only allow a 15 foot wide attached garage. The westerly addition, if moved south, somewhat, would alleviate the north variance by locating it 6.5 feet towards the front entry of the building. The westerly setback of 25.6 feet would still allow a 40 foot setback from the driving surface of Westedge Blvd. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend allowing a 4.4 foot variance to the west, Westedge Blvd., to afford the owner reasonable use of his land, however, i would recommend moving the garage 6.5 feet towards the south to allow conforming setback to the Beachwood road right -of -way. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This case will be referred to the City Council on April 24, 1990. • • till IV "t �G .� at 9 r , T&O-ce- � • / /7�l q# CITY COUNCIL PACKET - #2 "s iii . (if other then owner) ous resolutions must accompany this application.) 5` � that a il of the above s tatements and the statements contained 1h r 0011ers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- i Dint to the entry in or upon the premises described in this �,. Uption by any authorised official of the City of Mound for the purpMW # or of posting, ma intaining and removing such notices as may 66 required by low. ilaant's 5ignatura Date Zj r /rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrirrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr rrrrrrr FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Racommendatiun Date Council Action: Resolution No. _ Date ft N 73 U "s iii . (if other then owner) ous resolutions must accompany this application.) 5` � that a il of the above s tatements and the statements contained 1h r 0011ers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- i Dint to the entry in or upon the premises described in this �,. Uption by any authorised official of the City of Mound for the purpMW # or of posting, ma intaining and removing such notices as may 66 required by low. ilaant's 5ignatura Date Zj r /rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrirrrrrrr rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrr rrrrrrr FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Racommendatiun Date Council Action: Resolution No. _ Date ft N 73 Z. Do the existing structures comply with all setback regulations for the zoning district l n Yes No ( ). If no, specify each non -M. . M Which unique physicai characteristics of the subjeei Its reasonable use for any of the uses permi tt4 district? ( ) too narrow (X) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) of ho s wd 4. Was the hardship described above created by the actin ,_.. having property interests in the land after the zonine adopted? Yes ( ), No ( If yes, explain S. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No V. if yea, explain. f. a s^t{ > i r'^ 4 4 R I ANCE APPL i CAT I ON Case Mid. 1. Goes the present use of the property conform to all the zoning district in which it is located? Yes lr specify each non - conforming uses Z. Do the existing structures comply with all setback regulations for the zoning district l n Yes No ( ). If no, specify each non -M. . M Which unique physicai characteristics of the subjeei Its reasonable use for any of the uses permi tt4 district? ( ) too narrow (X) topography ( ) soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) of ho s wd 4. Was the hardship described above created by the actin ,_.. having property interests in the land after the zonine adopted? Yes ( ), No ( If yes, explain S. Was the hardship created by any other man -made change, relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No V. if yea, explain. f. a s^t{ c l r w k8 5 1iAR) AMM APPLICATI s e N o* r^' P. 6 Area the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance gkfiuller only to the property described in this petition? Yes 0Or If not how Many other properties are similarly affected? 0 U • Q. Mill granting of the variance be materially detrimental to property in the same zone, or to the enforcement of this ordinance? tlo • PART IiI J. �Vww „Rail, IM'. rwr We%:., . � Y ti iYSOLQ%Rg vv V WW. ,o,rGQ a site plan must be attached at a scale large enough for clarity show- ing the following informations 1. Location, area, and dimensions of existing and proposed: (Lot(s), building(s), driveways) /street access, off - street parking, and utilities. 2. Existing and proposed elevations. 3. Distance between: building and front, side and rear lot lines, principal building and accessory buildings; principal building and principal buildings on adjacent lots. 4. Location of: signs, easements, underground utilities, etc. S. Indicate "north" compass direction. 6. Any additional information a4 may reasonably be required by th� city staff and applicable sec -Ions of the Zoning Ordinance. ills ,~,Is the "minimum" modfffcati (vari from the areat bulks and it k roulatione that will permit you to makt reasonable use 4W yaf r land? MpeOffys, I ors, fit* [plans with dimensions and writ - ten explanati _S ______,. C.�NEIC! • z, r - s *INN" or A ME in or us NNW A01/IB9RII PAW =MIUIW AML Il 19" I Ji Gloom first presented tine parks Program Aweeltsnt. we plalnsd that there are basically no changls In the dprewent froi last year, however would like the Commission to suggest perks to be aced as •fever• pork* - He eupl that they will how 0 cow dinetor and an assistant available Prow 9e01t a.m. to ilea noon• Mondoy through T/wrsoey for the (lover perks. The following schedule too agreed upon• ti■breke n ow" Avalon llston T Ysdnaeday Tyrone Thursday nependine an the attendance, a schsdute wool be worked out$ Out for purposes of the flyer and articles to be published In the lo- cal paper. this schedule wl I I be presented as such. Byrnes questioned If signs could be posted In the perks to Inform Park users when a Coordinator wl l t be at their perk. The Perk Olrector agreed that this could be posted. Marilyn Byrnes and Cathy Bailey who have both worked as Min- neapolis Park Coordinators, will help train the Park Coordinators prior to the beginning of the season, probably the week of June 10th. Casey questioned If any of the staff has any sc l @ ,- C or envl ronmenta 1 background. He suggested hav ing nature walks or same sort of environmental education for the children. Me added that someone an the Hannep 1 n Parks staff cou ld come out for a special events day to eupervlse a nature walk. G l asce eg► l o l ned some of the subjects they have p l arxne0 for spa - coal event daysi one of which Is a free program offered by the Red Cross teaching first aid Soared towards children 9 to f years old. Gloom then reviewed the Lifeguard Program and stated there were no choose from the 1909 agreement. He oplalned that swimming lessons will be hold at Mound Bay Park Beach, Centerview Beach. and Pembroke Beach. Casey questioned the difference between the salary for a Lifeguard and a M.S.I. Giasce commented that the description for a M.S.I. should be eliminated. Essentially, a person who Is a M. 5.1. is a L l feguard and will not race l ve a higher salary be- cause they are a M.S.I. IDIOM made by Casey, seconded by SCholdt to apq�ove the Park Program and LIfoguerd Program Agreements with Cam - munity Services, with the stipulation that Community Services makes an effort to Include training or educe - tlon for their coordinators an the subject of environ- mental concerns. Motion carried unanimously. 111101 .k Aii4e&7 c wp e0�94eV OA aninlOtr ImEr The sngireer noted that the subject of augs+entation wells to increase the level of Lake Minnetonka wag recently addressed in the lditorial Page of the 3 tar.�Tr�s . The staff %,I e d s dwelop background information and analysis concerning this subject. imager Miller, seconded bt llana4er Love, offered the !Following resolution based upon the staff report: Tom Hu" Lake Minnetonka. The lake covers an area of roughly 12 square miles (14,000+ acres). It is the lower part of a 100 - square mile watershed (Upper MC) under Considerable development pressure. There are 130 miles of lakenhore around the baps and islands of Lake Minnetonka. The deepest part is over g0 feet deep (elevation 039). !even wells were constructed during the lots 1930s to augment the level of Lake Minnetonka. The first wall began pumping April 26, 1938. Pumping from all of the wells ended on April 10, 1942. The wells were decommissioned in the 1970s. pumps, pump houses, and electrical equipment were dismantled and removed. exco"o •mow •�- rYa 'X C E,40-t S PfoA Alf'_ .k Aii4e&7 c wp e0�94eV OA aninlOtr ImEr The sngireer noted that the subject of augs+entation wells to increase the level of Lake Minnetonka wag recently addressed in the lditorial Page of the 3 tar.�Tr�s . The staff %,I e d s dwelop background information and analysis concerning this subject. imager Miller, seconded bt llana4er Love, offered the !Following resolution based upon the staff report: Tom Hu" Lake Minnetonka. The lake covers an area of roughly 12 square miles (14,000+ acres). It is the lower part of a 100 - square mile watershed (Upper MC) under Considerable development pressure. There are 130 miles of lakenhore around the baps and islands of Lake Minnetonka. The deepest part is over g0 feet deep (elevation 039). !even wells were constructed during the lots 1930s to augment the level of Lake Minnetonka. The first wall began pumping April 26, 1938. Pumping from all of the wells ended on April 10, 1942. The wells were decommissioned in the 1970s. pumps, pump houses, and electrical equipment were dismantled and removed. exco"o •mow •�- rYa :oo t0r �� tcls zweliat+e eweea coulat y s 0�tt• ��A belOwt Looatioa CapsQitt W" Lake (2) 3000 � t�sist*ss Lain �0 'pr Oleasat Lajw 1500 On aal#ie za _ soon oo. LaMA�t a" ( ) 1406 00 Osap•s SRI loos 90• so 0040 to couralote the o#twet o! = seuetiMO rr isto 1410: so ai t o Most be +l "" lsli 3* "Sit us" to be e =A =on vi Not ►ltratsoa cwt be Ntuate4e am troeosissioa b t isil ial wetlaaft aid 06"o a aloe most aatlftYstod. pOp tatesler with ImistLay wells is the *qM*t,, especially srmicipal water flies, also out be e�tsi�►red• tZ2�l�Ob091 ivaporatioa- Preeipitatloa Maple Plain 30 -Yeas Average mean zVelposation Precipitation (inch" (inches) Jet 0.30 0.84 !!0 0.36 0.70 Mi1R 0.00 1.32 An 1.75 2.35 N" 3.00 3.99 J= 4 .00 4. 03 im 5.70 4.65 two 5 .60 4.09 m 4. 40 2.03 OCT 3.00 2.06 Nov 1.35 1.46 DEC 0.19 0.06 Total 30.71* 30.2 (2.56 feet) (2.52 feet) * 9stimatad from Minnesota Hydrology Guide. was- rli 1 �4 ` •s13o6� ayerosieltelr 14 as to a 1B oar 4.450. ft is i �c Cal 9 . !04 tallow to &IT go the lalaa e -l4et at lt i0si otlrec iwt s at losses • CotstY Gt.�OO -aes�to aeon low i 3, Jest. Ert a�raa low "m « ss� app resisattl 320 act" of wrfaa a>nu�• 1 ice. "s 504. T.2t allow to tsiss 00 �� • a , •t .000 o at 0 0 bw t0 . take M4. � to taiso too ilioat�:�t 1 tl r �! xowacn i sw .sN cioaeM as tit onto-foot aser rye, tatla0i� We 3 id" is 1 Teat • c m -m-1 z4he 2loot* are 6"Ifoximtely 265 acres of "ttom tt*s• t _ •i.33f.00Q 4alloss to noise tlrs 410•atioo 1 foot. l y =i�1 ao leatlw0 *It It wou P as soitY we 0" to TOL e� s tir a�►attoe l foot, s mo talon 2i. loos" • rienees 476 aeYe - a fedit Been a prati loss �s 266-w* laloe is 1 year • GU M0s Lair ?beta are o 61,9 2!7io�gallo s to rai B ut t s" e the •iw tioa i foot• it re"ites $ 00 gym o r 2,410 aCt• -Ept in 1 y ear. i pow ca�aeity was 1• 1 toot, °" it Mg t d talc 2 =•'1 days to raise the elevation loss losses, rat ?b Lou it 1!0 -acts lake onetienaes 400 aaso - toot aa�a rap° in 1 year. "]LOS Lam fro are approsieately 45 acres of sur area• It. requires 14,Of1,3.10 gallo to raise the elrratioa z loot. pug* c apacity was 3,000 99s or 4.040 sore -feet in I y0ar. It would take 3.4 days to raise the elevation 7. loot, naglectia9 lossos. This 45-4cre lake espariencas a 115 sets - too t esan evapora ors in I year. -b- Sa n ' 9rm. V15.) I T wbw tdr�a + - '• • Ma T 1 2 ! J r'4 h M .K.w _ a �C lw.rR•Y . .re+...Amw. v § ' "K � �, � � on 4r ' dry of Go itY of all Nis 3.4 w40 OL' 1 • ieta�f� r ox �.7 feet o! a atioa Crew . lrocordingiT. the bald of manor t t is b�� s Watershed District notes that gsoata is�steasiogly Psocioos r�sawraa� t h a t tn• use a! OYOU4dMator to I�eea cad the the i ncrea se the lrrol o! La Ni ;-& et oaha bas wells ale 1pe1t riori o $ � 4aif tLattt� a+rallabe info y, o 0422M - of si ifieast2 i ra o lie r to ut The 1 she Ate Parties a partiesstoo p erested partial, and invite WT iate pro ids additional ialos"tion to the board Concerning this attar. Vpoo vote, the notion carried. Ift IL There being no further business before ith Bard, the meting A. of the Board of m ana g er s was adlout Asspectlully submitted, John E. Thomas $ectstary UP92304 -40) RESOLUTION N0. -4 -390 The following resolution.was offered by Commissioner Spartz, } It IT RESOLVED, that staff is directed to prepare an a rse�ant for it#$* of the County wells at Lake Minnetonka to the As^ We wrthed D i slr#e-t for $ 1.00 y per ea r. • The question was on the adoption the resolution and there were YEAS and NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER Jeff Spartz. Randy Johnson John Keefe _ John E. Oerus Tad Jude Mark Andrew ;- Sam S. Sivanich, Chairman ATTEST: /• Cl erk of t e ounty Boar _ 10/ R�o,� .�n..J_ urJC�%►. 2 wed .�,em �d?a�t.. . FAX M: %r (t' rte„ I & FAX 0: (11_2 IF THERE ARE PROSLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, IMMEDIATELY TELEPHONE- AT: ( 612 ) NO COYER MESSAGE IF CHECKED MESSAGE: m rl"°5� 3 w �` ,+ c tt 41C GOMMIMONERS TEL No .61.'_ -348 -8701 Apr 25.90 8:50 NO .002 ° FAX. COVER SNEET N DATE: t TIME: 1 REGARDING: Q VUBW OF PAN$ INCLUDING THIS SHEET: TMiiE NINTS ARE: RESPONSE INSTRUCTIONS: 0001 FINIAL [ FAX YOUR RESPONSE TELEPHONE YOUR RESPONSE E AOtlTINE (� NO NEED TO RESPOND �• T0: �� .� - FROM: �t ;l le 'P FAX M: %r (t' rte„ I & FAX 0: (11_2 IF THERE ARE PROSLEMS WITH THIS TRANSMISSION, IMMEDIATELY TELEPHONE- AT: ( 612 ) NO COYER MESSAGE IF CHECKED MESSAGE: m 3 "t { d .77.711 A z : City of Mound Matonka Community Services S/F=IVz DATR: January 1, 1990. or wham offAs ally mew by *a* party of this apeemest . An agreement to ptovIde Parke Frog apt ssrvlaas tv" ComwOity Services Department go. 977. to tM City a#' The latent of this is to clarity, in wrltiog, all Involved in the cost of services for which the city billed and the Community Services Departamt is to provide. The attached information is categorised as: I. PARRS "Worm SWICSS; A. Parks Programs by Park Least Ions S. Scheduled flours and Dates of Services C. Training Program Description D. supervision Scheme 2. Salary Schedule. Philosophy ;w F Summary 0. Cost of service for 1990, estimated s A. PARK PROGRAMS BY LOCATION The following parks are provided services as described: 1. Community Center (Day Camp Program) Z. Swenson (Island) Park 8. Three Points Park 4. Highlands Park 8. Belmont Park 6. Clover Circle Park 7. Rover To Be Determined • B. Scheduled flours and Dates of services: These parks are served June 16 or the first monday fol and will run for six (6) weeks with no programs the we July 4th of each year. Jim Olasce monitors the usage weather and established exact opening /closing dates. for these parks are 6:00 a.m. - Moon, monday through f Additionally, there is sou additional time for swimmin . neighborhood beaches. This usually happens only one to tj times per week for the duration of the program. � r N C. Training Program Description: It is canon knowledge that the quality of a program depends greatly on the people wbo are running it. It i s w ith th I mind that and inservice and training concept has !feel► developed to insure that our parks program staff will be wall prepared and able to deliver a high quality program. lreseem= Training: As a condition of emploxmemt, all Playground Leaders, Day Caap Leaders and as afty p ress" sift* will take part In an a o al iaeervice and traimimg program that is available through the Ninnesota Parks and Recreation Association. Additionally, all staff will be required to attend weekly inservices on specific topics related to the program. The 1990 Training Concept will emphasize: 1. 1989 Program Review, "Its successes and failures" Z. First Aid Review "Policies and Procedures" 9. Use of Two Nay Radios 4. Innovative Program Ideas ''Brainstorming" 5. Program Planning (weekly) The people listed below compromise the active supervision of the parks program. Mile primary duties are in the hands of the Parks Supervisor, it is important that others involved In park activities also be recognised as having snpervisory authority. Don Ulrick Director Occasional park monitoring, especially at Nound Say Park. Response to citizens concerns. Jim Glesoe Recreation Coor. Assists with the day to day coordination from the Community Services office. Occasional park monitoring. • • /M �g h to PK ice. . ; 46 "Ift .. Otto �ry J .:. f ��Y� �! OtNi �$li�M► _ . .E b 104106 01OW tbdt tie More, tvalabe O . #m w Ml had. the WYO fi43"bu �rrrd a .�►> rrohedaiwe "Ot r i tod #� • _ ' * , Y r dwei �i►ioh a�a ut►ldy IM wos !900 � alb rrilasY step • A�lilt l+�wia� iy � �► baOrlr � 4 ochm NOl0 INS raised to a level that me m pa ' With Off oaipeting° aeomcits. we per that well and tw y U* 1wilo it. We expect thou to perform accordingly or we replace tWW- Below is the salary schedule issued i the AMinistrativa Regulation 04231, dated 6/1/46 for JulY 1 - June 80, 19" fiscal Year. PLAYOROOND AIDi $3.80 3.60 3.10 6.40 3.60 DAY CAMP ASST. PLAYGROUND LZADZR $4.00 4.26 4.80 4.60 4.18 DAY CAMP LRADER $8.00 6.80 6.00 6.80 1.00 ` OUTDOOR LDOCATOR " �y 1g i„r a } awls Fm 40 4600"t Ift"Pesee oflapsi most M maa WO bows of owlfiy"at !s MM or t a 160"10 dmriag tbo past twelvi •off r k► ' MR at ogob fir. w* Omwe k u µ Imm"So! !hold to d } "YS Y F 1 sestimmes to vmw. I* must aske every mi4m attar we mmesvIng a gostlity Oftmotimal a" above Mitten. All of the to are atte"t s to noble , am will so for many :r h , • /M k , t M 1 ipfr , c COST ESTIMATE MOUND PARKS PROGRAM �l r,• 1990 Fa' LABOR: Yr PARRS PROGRAM /LIFEGUARD SUPERVISOR; 30NR2/WK X 6 MKS X $8.00 / NR M COST TO PARKS PROGRAM = $1r4 PARK COORDINATORS 16 NRS/NK X 6 WKS X $4.25/NR X 5 PARKS + ROVMt INCLUDING BENEFITS PARK ASSISTANTS 18 NRS /NK X 6 WKS X $4.00 /NR X 5 PARKS + ROVER INCLUDING BENEFITS • $2,90«x_ DAY CAMP COORDINATOR' 30 NRVUK X 6 MKS X $5.25/NR INCLUDING BENEFITS = $1,087 DAY CAMP ASSISTANTS 30 NRS /MK X 6 WKS X 4.25/NR X 2 ASSTS. INCLUDING BENEFITS COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICE STAFF = $1,600.06 (Jis Glasoe as well as Secretaraial time) EQUIPMENT ( Softball ,Parachutes,Gases,Coolers etc) $ 400.E SUPPLIES (Paints,Paper,Craft Supplies,Snacks) _ $ 600.00. TRANSPORTATION (50 Nrs.910.00 + 250.00 silage = $ 760.00 MISCELLANEOLIS = $ 100.00 SUBTOTAL =$14,004.6$ x ADMIX FEE _ $2,100.41 TOTAL =$16,105.20 REVEXUES : DAY CAMP 30 KIDS X $25.009A X 6 WKS $4,500.00 x SPECIAL EVENT DAYS 100 KIDS X .50EA X 6 DAYS $ 300.00 TOTAL REVENUE _ $4,800.00 CITY OF MOUND SUBSIDY NEEDED =$11,305.20 NET INCREASE OVER 1989 FIGURES = 2E AGARRMS•! SZTNW: City of Mound fteteMM Community Services, District 9377 ;. XYMIX" 002s Jinuary 1, 1900 or when officially accepted by Saab party of this agreement. ` An aprosmnt to provift lifeguard services -row the Cos h Servioss Deportwsnl, to the City of Mound. The iataat ok this agreement is to clarify, in writing, all activities involved In the cost of services for which the city is billed and the Comity Services Department is responsible to provide. The attached information is categorized as: I. Lifeguard services at six (6) city beaches I. LIPSWARD SRRVICRB Information of this program will be categorized as follows: A. Lifeguard Service Scheduled by Beach Location S. Scheduled Hours and Dates of Lifeguard Services C. Training Program Description D. Supervision Scheme R. Salary Schedule Philosophy P. Summary 0. Cost of Service for 1000, estimated LIPSOVARD SUCH 8CHZDOLZ, CITY 01 MOUND The following beaches are provided lifeguard services as described: I. HOUND BAY PARK Memorial Day to Labor Day and all non- rain days, between those dates. The guards are on duty 11:00 am. - 7:00 p.m. There are three (3) guards during the middle of the day when lunch breaks occur and traffic in the park is the heaviest. Z. MYTCHMOOD BRACH 3. PRMBROOK BEACH 4. CHZ8TRR PARK BEACH it t3 b. CRNTRRVIRM bAACH 6. BLORBIRD LANZ BRACH • • • These five beaches are served June 15 to August 15 (or to the nearest weekend day). Jim Glasoe monitors the usage due to weather and establishes exact opening /closing dates. Nours on these beaches are 1 -4 pa., seven (7) days per weak. Additionally, there is some additional guard time (in 30- minute increments) for swim lesson guarding at neighborhood beaches. This usually happens only three (3) days per week for six (6) weeks. C. LIFEGUARD TRAINING COMCBPT - The hiring of a person that has acquired a lifeguard certificate through Red Cross programs can be dangerous without ongoing training. what happens is that they do not owls in the winter, and therefore, are not conditioned to perform in an emergency. Further, the test for a lifesaving certificate is knowledge and skill attainment. In the water, under emergency conditions, can be critical if water training does not occur each summer. Lifeguards will complete testing in the Mater and written testing, to qualify for employment. This testing is to determine areas of needed improvement and serve as an evaluation of the staff for purposes of designing training sessions. Training has bee at the pool and early morning sessions at the beach in the water. The guards must have the courage to enter the water under all climatic conditions including cold temperatures. Tne corps of guards all participate in an annual review of first aid, and are recertified in C.P.R. In addition to the summer inservice that is part of this agreement, there is ongoing training for high school -age guards during the winter months. By re- hiring college -age guards during summer, we retain experienced people and provide employment for the families of our community sending children to college. This arrangement serves the families and the city. The 1990 Training Concept will emphasize: I. Review of the "new' Red Cross requirements for certification. 2. First Aid Review - Policies /Procedures 3. Lifeguarding skills review, update on newest techniques 4. Use of emergency two -way radios at selected beaches :z WY D. LItROUARD SUPRRVISION SCHUR The people listed below comprise Life guards on the beaches. Uhl, duties are in the hands of Taal Supervisor, it is important that Involved in park activities also supervisory authority. the active supervision of Le primary supervision Stahllre, Lifeguard city department heads be recognized as having Don Vlrick, Director -- Occasional beach monitoring, especially at Mound day Park. Response to citizen concerns. Jim Olasoe, Recreation Coordinator -- Assists with the day to day coordination from the Community Services office. Occasional beach monitoring. Tani Stahlke, Lifeguard Supervisor - -Is employed to hire personnel, develop lifeguard training programs, lifeguard testing, shift scheduling, payroll, coordination with city staff, equipment maintenance, and supervision. She has as the primary responsibility to supervise the beach staff. Jim Packer, Park Director - -When working at the listed beaches observes the actions of the guards and admonishes, directs, or otherwise becomes involved if the activities do not meet acceptable standards. The Citizens -- Perform a volunteer duty by reporting undesirable actions they observe on the beaches. Their input is invaluable to beach supervision. He may recruit neighborhood citizens to observe and report inappropriate actions. They would remain anonymous to the guards. This would be an expansion of the neighborhood involvem^nt as phone locations in the event of emergency. The guards have the name of the house they may go to use the telephone in emergency. Neighborhood cooperation has been excellent. • 1 /f6 • SALARY SCHEDULE PHILOSOPHY- -Sou years ago surfaced the concern of the number of guards we were training and than subsequently hired at a higher rate by other area agencies, i.e. Hennepin County, Lafayette Club, etc. It became clear that the more training and experience the individual had the more valuable they became. From that evolved a salary schedule that reflected this concept. Bach year during which a guard woke 100 hours, they raise a salary step. Additionally, if they become a Water Safety Instructor they are raised according to years of service on the salary schedule. No pay them more, and they are worth more. we expect than to perform accordingly or we replace them. Below is the salary schedule issued in Administration Regulation 04231, dated 6/1/89 for July -June 30, 1990 fiscal year. ASST. LIFEGUARD (POOL OR BEACH) 4.00 4.25 4.50 4.75 5.00 BEAD LIFEGUARD (POOL OR BEACH) 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 ADULT LIFEGUARD 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 XEPERIEHCE FOR IHCRUNNT INCREASE - -To qualify for an Increment, an employee must be able to document at least LOO hours of employment in one or more of the water activity classifications during the past 12 month period from June I of each year. Now employees may be awarded experience credit by the Community Services Supervisor for similar documented employment in other credible organizations. • //11V SlIPLOYMiNT RXQOIRENIWS AND ZVALUATION Lifeguard I. Most hold a current Certified Life Saving Certificate. Z. A 16 year old must have or obtain a C.P.R. card within 60 days after hiring. 9. A performance review will be made 80 days after hiring. ♦. In and out of water screening will be made at supervisor's discretion. M.S.I. I. Must be 17 years of age and hold a current Certified W.S.I. card. Z. Must have current C.P.R. card and First Aid training. 9. A performance review will be made 40 days after hiring. 4. In and out of water screening will be made at supervisor's discretion. SUMMARY- As our community has grown in numbers of residents using the beaches, and the number of non - residents frequenting our public parks during the summer months, the attitude of accident prevention (responsibility) has grown In the minds of city staff, citizens, parents, and city council members. In essence, we are providing for the welfare of our citizens by providing safe beaches. Any death by drowning casts a pall over the lake felt by swimmers and boaters alike. He have riot had to report a drowning. Death or serious injury has been prevented from marring the lives of our citizens by vigorously supplying pr ientive measures through the employment, training and suyervision of a lifeguard staff. 's C , 1/8-7 4 r^ a: .mot COST ESTIMATES CITY BEACHES 1994 LABOR: MEADGUARDS- 773 MRS. • $6.10 /MR = $4,715.30 SURFSIDE BEACE 900 MRS. • $4.65/NR = $4,165.00 FIVE SMALL BEACHES 825 MRS. 0 $4.65/MR= $3,836.25 INNREVICE: 225 MRS. • $4.50/NR = $1,012 50 MILAOE (ROVING GUARD AND SUPERVISION) 1100 MILES • .21 /MI = $ 231.00 SUPERVISION: 200 MRS.® $7.50 /11R $1,500.40 EQUIPMENT: _ $ 100.40 SUBTOTAL = $ 15,580.05 ADMIN FEE _ $ 2,337.01 TOTAL = $ 17,917.06 NET INCREASE OVER 1989 FIGURES = 38 • l t 5PA ry. 7t � RRBOLV?ION NO. 90 REBOLOTIOE AceRmn us nu no OPEN SPACE CONUBS=ON' S R1 N F ION to TO WE roOMD RAT PA[ DEPO* AND TO WE=? CITY "A" TO DXmOP R M so I'M am nu FOR no= RAT N= V�kN, the Building Official of the City of Mound has determined that there aremajor safety hazards and code violations at the Bound Bay Park Depot building, and; W=RREAB, the City's architect has agreed with the Building Official and has made some recommendations on improvements that ought to be made to the Depot building, and; •EEREAB, the Park and Open Space Commission has discussed this in great detail at their regular meetings, and; WEEREAB, the Westonka Historical Society has also been involved in discussions with the Park and Open Space commission on the same issue, and; MRRAB, the architect has provided an estimated cost of $80,700 to make specific improvements to the Depot, and; WasamIB, the City Planner was directed to develop a preliminary concept plan for improvements to Mound Bay Park, and; WNBRBAB, those improvements are estimated to cost approximately $125,000, and; •HERE7IB, the Parks and Open Space Commission has recommended that the Depot improvements be made at this time, and; RHEREAB, the Parks and Open Space Commission has recommended that the staff be directed to develop a detailed site plan for the park. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mound City Council hereby directs the City Manager to have the City's architect prepare plans and specifications and to advertise for bids to make the improvements to the Depot as listed in the architect's letter of March 1, 1990. LJ 11 1 s U I? rOMTnR MiPOLVID, that the Mound City Council hereby directs the City Manager to have the city planner develop a detailed site plan for Mound Hay Park. The following councilmeabers voted in the affirmative: The following councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk • 2 NO TO: FROM: lit: DATE: CITY of NIOU \'D PARK AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION ED 3HUKLE, CITY MANAGER y M k% 5341 MAYWOOC WO^- MOUND MINNES07A 56M it 12, 4 MOUND BAT PARK DEPOT REMODELING AND MOUND BAY PARK MA3T91 PLAN MARCH 1, 1990 At the February 8, 1990 Park and Open Space Commission Meeting, the Park and Open Space Commission directed staff to prepare a list of items with regard to the improvements needed at the Mound Bay Park Depot and the master plan for Mound Bay Park. Attached is a letter dated March 1, 1990 from Steve Jantzen of McCombs. Frank Roos dealing with the Mound Bay Park remodeling project. Also attached, is a letter dated February 26, 1990 regarding the Mound Bay Park Master plan, written by Mark Koegler, City Planner, from VanDoren Hazard and Stallings. Both letters address each area that we talked about at our last meeting with regard to improving the Depot and the master plan. They attempt to list the specific items of concern and particularily in the case of the Depot spell out what the items are by priority and estimated cost. In Mark's letter, he lists the costs for each item dealing with the master plan. He doesn't prioritize those because he is not sure how the Park and Open Space Commission views their importance. The Depot itself has certain structural needs that Must be addressed. I believe Steve has done that very well. Mark has given you a real good idea of the items that could be considered within the park and is giving you estimated costs for making those improvements. I think both p100003 of information have gotten us to a point now where the Park and Open Space Commission must make some decisions and subsequent recommendations to the City Council. Mark will be present at the Park and Open Space Commission meeting to address any questions that arise regarding his letter. I will attempt to answer questions with regard to Steve's letter. ES:1 s • • /rq� • FES 2 "r 1994 Mr. Ed thuk l e, City Manager C1 of Mound � S3i) M wood Road 55364 . Dear Ed: As a follow -up to our discussion at the Park Coseis tso 4th # we have reviewed potential improvements to *Wed is , prepared a corresponding cost estimate. the itros1 3Pit . to the facilities identified on the prelimiaarg per. t► dated February 33, 1990. Cost Estimate S 1. Construct new parking area, upgrade oxistfs# par#iag and construct entrance drive. 90st a6 paying * . receive a 1 1 /2" bituminous overlay of fix settlement areas. Concrete curb and 4 1113W (00 tt; be installed around the perimeter of a." existing "d parking areas. All parking and drivewq ere &s will served by a new storm sewer system. Estimated cost: $43,500.00 2. Replace existing play structure Estimated cost: ;9,000.00 3. landscaping - plantings to enhance the appearance of tfitp park and to provide shade in picnic area. Estimated cost: $10,000.00 4. lighting - Decorative overhead lighting in the parking a and driveway areas. F Estimated cost: $14,000.00 S. Construct a picnic shelter (approx. 30' 1 30') s Estimated cost: $13,500.00 I 8030 Harbor lane North 0140.11, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 66141 -=116 6121668-1160 to } February t6. Mr. Ed thuk l e, City Manager C1 of Mound � S3i) M wood Road 55364 . Dear Ed: As a follow -up to our discussion at the Park Coseis tso 4th # we have reviewed potential improvements to *Wed is , prepared a corresponding cost estimate. the itros1 3Pit . to the facilities identified on the prelimiaarg per. t► dated February 33, 1990. Cost Estimate S 1. Construct new parking area, upgrade oxistfs# par#iag and construct entrance drive. 90st a6 paying * . receive a 1 1 /2" bituminous overlay of fix settlement areas. Concrete curb and 4 1113W (00 tt; be installed around the perimeter of a." existing "d parking areas. All parking and drivewq ere &s will served by a new storm sewer system. Estimated cost: $43,500.00 2. Replace existing play structure Estimated cost: ;9,000.00 3. landscaping - plantings to enhance the appearance of tfitp park and to provide shade in picnic area. Estimated cost: $10,000.00 4. lighting - Decorative overhead lighting in the parking a and driveway areas. F Estimated cost: $14,000.00 S. Construct a picnic shelter (approx. 30' 1 30') s Estimated cost: $13,500.00 I 8030 Harbor lane North 0140.11, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 66141 -=116 6121668-1160 to m.` Mr. Ed Shukle February 26, 1990` Page 2 6. Walkway - construct an 8 foot bituminous walkway connecting major features in the park. {` Estimated cost: $4,000.00 r 7. Benches and Trash Receptacles y Estimated cost: $3,000.00 8. Beach Relocation and Restoration Estimated cost: $3,600.00 9. Subtotal: $100,600.00 10. Contingency 0 10%: $10,060.00 11. legal, Administration, Surveying, Planning, Engineering and Construction Staking Estimated Cost: $13,500.00 12. TOTAL PROJECT COST: $124,160.00 At this point, the preliminary concept plan does not include a fishing pier. Depending on the type of pier, costs for this item could range from $15,000 to $30,000. Additionally, the plan does not include a lawn sprinkler system. Based on the preliminary plan, turf areas in the park account for approximately 1.9 acres. Irrigation of these areas would greatly assist in maintaining adequate turf cover. The cost of an underground irrigation system for Mound Bay Park would run approximately $8,000.00. At the last Park Commission meeting, we briefly discussed possible funding sources for the improvements at Mound Bay Park. The Outdoor Recreation Grant Program administered by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development is a potential source of funding. The program utilizes funds from both state and federal sources. For reference, I have attached pages from the grant manual that provide an overview of the program. Included are lists of eligible and ineligible facilities and a description of the application process. If the city desires to pursue a grant application, information must be submitted by September 1, 1990. In February of 1991, cities are notified as to the acceptance or rejection of their projects. • IN 5 L } ter,.• � +� �!;,` i Will be dttrrwdance at the next Park Commission meetin AO r"i4W Nouwd Nay Park. Prior to that time, please f �r r tootett at if y ou have any questions. 3 ia 4. � a.. t ,rw VAN OGREN- NAZARO- STALLINGS. INC. R. Mark Ko"l t ip Masser :Oft file. D fi 5 * t s t t C F� ii4y t , iili FAX March 1, 1990 4 J. 8hukle. Jr.. City Manager I WAWA , �►� 353► r,. 't Citgr of *"d vinalmeta W fttk 00Oot Remodeling WMMA 081" s taw been requested to prioritize the possible improvements to the Mound stoted in our letter of November 8, 1989, and also to furnish a 0WC*StIwte for enclosing the west end for use by the historical society. ry aforementioned letter lists 12 items of concern, along with associatud cats. We would prioritize these items in 4 groups as follows: 0 1 Item 1 - Brace existing walls S 3,000 Item 2 - Reinforce interior floor S 3,000 Item 3 - Repair roofed deck, railing and stairs S 10,000 TOTAL S 116,000 OROUP 2 Item 6 - Upgrade kitchenette S 13,000 Item 8 - Install sprinkler system in lower level S 5,000 Item 10 - Outside air intake for furnace S 500 Item 11 - Fire extinquishers, exit &igns, emergency lighting S 1,000 TOTAL $ ,50 GROG Item 7 - Bring toilets up to code S 7,000 Item 12 - Basement stair handrails S 200 TOTAL S 7,200 GROUP 4 Items 4, 5, and 9 - Reinforce bay window, repair wood siding, soffits & fascia, add insulation S 8,0' /IBS An Equal Opportunity Ernployer t • J 0 • Mr. R&ard J. Shukle, Jr. March 1. 1990 Pap Two a Group i includes items which are most critical because they deal with 6 failure of building elements which could cause injury. Group 2 includes items which address code issues that deal with safety of the public. Group 3 Includes items which deal with handicapped accessibility and city personnel safety issues. Group 4 includes items which deal with aesthetic 9 maintenance issues. Inclosing the area under the roof on the west of the building would provide an additional 576 square feet of space per level. This could be done by enclosing only the upper level or by enclosing both levels. The approximate cost for enclosing the upper level only is $30.000. If both levels are enclosed, the approximately cost would be $40.000. We hope this provides the information you need. If you have any questions or need additional information. please contact us. Sincerely. MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC. f f Steven W. Jantzen. P.�.. A.I . SJ:jmj 070 Ir A 1 7z3. Park Commisslon Minutes April 12. 1990 ftGO ! ,- e „ ► �'. Ld ft*109 reviewed Steve Jantzen's r ndat ion n ' ` M On the OOP*t which would total 9 700. Ofty Ilm"91 rssoaowndrdo from a mianaOebent and practical 0600- gbh nt • that all the r improvemen to the depot OfN t hiM Instead Of In phases. He commwnted that a I 1 40 the INIKOWSMINIt wi l I have to be done at some point anywoy. 1#t 0100 101n6d that the dock Is a llsbl11ty as It stands, and has 110" IN - 118 - by the out l dl ng Off fetal I and currently the but I d- 104 dMe not meet code. TOW CpM Iss1 on questioned If the historical value of the build was strong enough to constitute spending the money on the rtWlrs. It was determined that a new building, with less square fastalhe • would cost much more. The City Planner, Mark "for reviewed his proposed Improve - M is to the 1Ork which would cost approx i mate 1 y $ 124,000. The 40MIssloners agreed that It was a good plan however, the depot 1f the ma in concern at this po int. Koeglor commented that If the Of: ot Is improved, perking oval lab111ty should be addressed. IM City Manager confirmed that If the improvements to the depot were Made there are funds eve I I ob I a 1n the Capitol I mproveme nt Fund to pay for It. The •22,000 a llocated for park Improvements from the five year plan wl I I not have to be spent on the depot. 110TION made by Msber, seconded by @a ll ey e to recommend to the City CounclI to move ahead with the building Im- provements so citizens can enjoy the Mound depot for years to come. In addition reoa�end that the City Plairner proceed with the site plan for the perk. Motion carr ied unanimously. This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council at their meeting on April 21, 1990. 0 /147 RESOLUTION NO. 90 -4 -363 The following resolution was offered by Commissioner Jude, seconded by Commissioner Derus: WHEREAS, The upper midwest is suffering a drought that is severely impacting our natural resources, in particular the levels of Minnesota lakes; and WHEREAS, Lake Minnetonka is at a second all -time low of approximately four feet below normal water levels; and WHEREAS, The lake shore properties surrounding Lake Minnetonka have been served with new sanitary sewer systems within the last fifteen years in lieu of septic systems, thereby eliminating the infiltration of water to the lake; and WHEREAS, the city of Minneapolis has in past years utilized Mississippi River flowage to raise lake levels within the city and demonstrated the practicality and acceptability of this method, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Hennepin County Public Works Department perform a study on utilizing river water to maintain the normal lake level on Lake Minnetonka. The study shell include an investigation of the environmental and financial consequences to the County and its citizens anJ shall be coordinated with input from the Hennepin County Soil and Water Conservation District. Commissioner Keefe moved to amend the resolving clause, after the word consequences to include "and the drawing from the lake waters to water lawns . . . " The motion was seconded by Commissioner Spartz and adopted unanimously (Sivanich absent). The question was on the adoption of the resolution as amended and there were Four YEAS and Two NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER Jeff Spartz X Randy Johnson X John Keefe X John E. Derus X Tad Jude X — Mark Andrew, Vice Chairman X Sam S. Sivanich, Chairman ABSENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED. ATTEST: Clerk 'of the County Board MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HMMID ADVISORY PARK COHNISSION APRIL 12, 1990 The "Adopt a Tree" program was reviewed which is being planned for Saturday, April 21st from MOO a.m. - 3:00 p.m. at the VFW, volunteers are needed. Casey will be at the table for one hour. Asleson offered to volunteer one hour at the table after the walk. The dedication ceremony was reviewed for signege at the new na- ture area located on Drummond Lane, Block 11, Lots 13 S 14, Devon, on Tuesday. April 24th at 6130 p.m. (prior to City Council meeting). It was suggested that any Park Commissioners who are able to attend should be there. The Earth Day Pledge Resolution submitted by Tom Casey was reviewed. Burke questioned If the paragraph relating to "VOTE" could be deleted, he does not agree with that portion of the resolution since he my not vote for that candidate If they sup- port some other Issue he 19 not in favor of. MOTION made by Casey, seconded by As 1 eson to recommend to the City Council that the Proposed Resolution be ap- proved. Motion carried 7 - 1 (those In favor wares As- leson, Mebery Andersen, Byrnes, Casey, Bailey, and Schmldti those opposed wares Burke). This resolution will be forwarded to the City Council on April 24, 1990. U //q? �.SbLVTO N EA RTH DAY 1990 w ems; BECAUSE... our planet today toes severs ormfonm cases such as global warming. rain forest devastation. growing world population. and water and air pollution... GREEN PLEDGE BECAUSE... de0ends on every notion. ndividuol... t the planet's f;.Iwfs the cornmorrent a• as well as every 141DO)1 MERrjRAF I wE e T T RSOLMO Tt - r. 0 OUR .f'P TO DO LEOGE Jb SHARE IN SAVING THE PLANET BY LETTING W CONCERN FOR THE ENVIRONMENT SHAPE How WE ACT: w lpledge to do if utmost to recycle, conserve energy, save water, use efficient transportation, and try to adopt a lifestyle as if every day were Earth Day. PURCHASE: u o'pledge to buy and use those products least harmful to the environment. Moreover,vf will do business with corporations that promote global environmental responsibility. VOTE: 1pledp to vote for and support those candidates who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment. SUPPORT: a'pledge to support the passage of local, state. and federal laws and international treaties that protect the-environment. WE R - COVAMENC) MOUND tkIN COUNCIL. VtSTE IN IPANDV. OF THl$ 'RESOLUZto Earth Day 1990 — April 22, 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - (tear here) — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — LET EARTH DAY KNOW YOU HAVE JOINED THOUSANDS OF OTHERS IN TAKING THE GREEN PLEDGEI Signature Name (please print) Address CRY state ZIP I am interested in volunteering my time. Please contact me. Here is a number where I can be reached: K• 12 Student r College Student Please return to: Earth Day 1990 2512 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414 11 �i r� TEN STEPS TO HELP SAVE THE EARTH Thee are just a few helpful hints to make you a better Earth Kuper. Try some of these suggestions and you'll sae yew een make a difilerenoei Once you hew the confidence that individuelly you are helping out, you will went to expend vow horiam end look for more solutions to the arcs of soil end water aoneervetton, recycling end weate reductlon, atwrgy use, taft end pollutants, preaervetion of life end snviromment, activism and educetton, end aettfq habits. Reiaeeh&r -- There is one Earth snd It is house to as &ill 1. Buy recycled, recyclable, reliable, repairable, refillable or reusable products; avoid disposables such as platic plates; cups and utensils. (U.S. citizens use 2.5 million Plastic bottles EVERY HOUR; only 5 percent of which are recycled.) 2. Separate your recyclable garbage (paper, glass, aluminum, and organic waste if you have a garden); only send to the land(iII what you can't reuse. I Use public transportation, carpool, bike or walk. Drive a fuel efficient car. 4. Eat lower on the food chain - vegetables, fruits and grains. Decrease consumption of meat and animal products. 5. During the winter, wear a sweater rather than turn up the thermostat; in summer, if you have home air conditioning turn the ; hhhnostat up a few degrees. Close off and do not heat or cool unused rooms. 6. Hang your clothes in the sun to dry. 7. Install sink faucet aerators and water -eff Iclent shower heads. These use 2 to 5 times less water with no noticeaDle decrease in performance. Do not let water run while showering, shaving, brushing teeth or hand - washing clothes or car. 8. Don't throw any kind of battery into the trash; save them until recycling is possible. You may have to hold onto them for a couple of years until technology catches up to our recycling needs. 9. Educate yourself and others on environmental Issues. Join credible conservation organizations. 10. Take pleasure In the beauty and wonder of the Earth, and take time to learn about and enjoy nature. (We need to do something every day to remind ourselves of our fundamental connections to all other life forms. It could be as simple as taking a walk and noting the actions of birds and the shapes and colors of plant life. Whenever possible, go outside.) • 1A00 RESOLUTION EARTH DAY 1990 GREEN PLEDGE WHEREAS, our planet today faces severe environmental crises such as global warming, rain forest devastation, growing world population, and water and air pollution, and WHEREAS, the planet's future depends on the commitment of every nation, as well as every individual. NOW, THEREFORE BE iT RESOLVED, THAT we pledge to do our share in saving the plant by letting our concern for the environ- ment shape how wet Acts We pledge to do our utmost to recycle, conserve energy, save water, use efficient transportation, and try to adopt a lifestyle as if every day were Earth Day. Purchases We pledge to buy and use those products least harmful to the environment. Moreover, we will do business with corporations that promote global environmental responsibility. • Votes We pledge to vote for and support those candidates who demonstrate an abiding concern for the environment. Supports We pledge to support the passage of local, state, and federal laws and international treaties that protect the en- vironment. /201 • MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE igi1ND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION APRIL 12, 1990 • Casey reviewed the intent of this resolution. The City should en- force the statement at the bottom of the Dock Applications stating: "The use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides Is not allowed on city property." Casey stated that he feels City employees should receive permission from the City Council prior to applying chemicals on City property. It was argued the Park Director should be allowed to make decisions of when and where to spray these chemicals without City Council permission. MDT i ON mode by Casey. seconded by As 1 eson to recommend the City Council approve the proposed resolution with number 2. -- a i - mound to read as fo I 1 ows: 2. Enoct an ordinance prohibiting any person, other than Clty em IgXtes. from applying fertl i izers, herbicides and pesticides on public shorelands un- der the control of the City. Matron carried uneniumoly. • This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council on April 24, 1990. /a oJ6% RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on June 8, 1989, the City of Mound Park and Open Space Commission voted 8 -1 to recommend that tires not be allowed on city docks; WHEREAS, 'on June 8, 1989, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that fertilizer not be allowed on City property; WHEREAS, on September 14, 1989, the Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend that herbicides not be used on City property except at the cemetery and city hall, thereby reaffirming the City's current practice; WHEREAS, on November 9, 1989, the Commission voted unanimously to expand the statement on the bottom of the Dock Permit Application to read, "The use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides is not allowed on City property." WHEREAS, 1990 Dock Applications contain the language, "Tires are Ma allowed on city rental dock sites. All tires must be removed from city property by May 1, 1990. The use of fertilizer, herbicides and pesticides is not allowed on city property "; WHEREAS, on January 22, 1990, the City Council amended the dock ordinance, thereby prohibiting tires on city docks; 0 WHEREAS, the Mound City Code does = presently prohibit the application of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides on public shorelands under the control of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mound Park and Open Space Advisory Commission recommends that the City Council: I. Amend Section 437 of the Mound City Code (pertaining to Dock Licenses) to add a section prohibiting dock license holders from applying fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides on public shorelands under the control of the City; and 2. Enact an ordinance prohibiting Dim person, from �� c4her �txlr, city etnPlpyK's, applying fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides on public shorelands under the control of the City. • /a0 3 1 59 Sept" ►or 26, ItaS 1tCtpi AT Tss csy!?aT are -�+. r. AL The Attie$ City Nasa$er stated that the City did sprat for daedelioea eel weds but had stopped is 1915 due to the teat. The Mott isto the ISM. Currently the ewatert sad the City tall are the soly city properties that are sprayed. The part Coeaissios would like the City to reaffi n its polity o• the use of herbicides on City property. After discussios Jebsses coved sad .lessee seconded the tollovis$ eotien: Tst 11 10 1 111 11 1) CUT COONCIL RUM AWtu t2Tt Tit ti1R AptSM amistal TEAT Tst Dst of tt1SICIDU as CITT PMUTT 81001D tt CA1t10LLT NOSITCUD. SOT Tst COOKIE ALSO aQINp TYT 11th MI u nm MO it is Is Tst B Igram a Tst clTr AND M 01"OMNOT 20 Oss MSICiDp. 2111"Ot1 Tat CWKIL MUM u ITSt1J TU UGNT To ttTity T1I6 tOLICt an A use ST List "Ilis The veto we ueasisouslt is favor. Na tios tarried. M 1 MUTES CIF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION FEBRUARY B. 1990 Rasolutlan arohlbltlno aaollcetion of fertilizers herbicides and peat I c l des an nubile shore 1 ends . Casey referred to a proposed resolution which he distributed to the Commission for their approval. Casey COmsented that since the City Coun Cll has adopted a resolution roeonmending that tires not be allowed On City dOCks. he would like to follow - through with a resolution prohibiting the application of fertilisers. herbicides. and pesticides on public shorelands. MCITION made by Casey to approve the proposed resolution prohibiting dock license holders from spolying for - tllliers. herbicides. and pesticides on public shorelands. Asloson seconded the motion with an amend- ment to Item 2. as follows. "Enact an ordinance prohibiting any person . . . Control of the City other t han City enlolOVees Weber and Jessen rolled some Concerns for prohibiting the use Of these Chemlcal,. suCh as purple Ioo how to enforCej and what If there Is a need for these chemicals In the future. Casey rebutted. stating that a resolution was passed prohibiting tires. and enforcement of tires Compared to the use of chemicals Is no different. He reminded the COfMllselOn that they have already passed a motion prohibiting the use Of these Chemicals on City property. Some Commission members stated that it was too late In the eve- ning to Continue discussion on this Issue. and they would like time to think atDout It. Casey moved to withdrew his prevlous motion. MOTION made by Casey. seconded by Bailey to continue discussion of this proposed resolution at the next Park Commission meeting on March B. 1990. Motlon carried un- anlmously. Ijo /a-06 tr11>< w Mfg l�s,.. w w sea� One D otlor (:1.00) and otl"W tdaratip� 't' It Is specifically understood and agreed by I tq tiat ttwt shot only have a right to use a portion OF %to t s asrd only use that they my put this property to to IR is understood and agreed that the lesser rotates i►11 M �#At1�fsE A property and that the gardening shelf not to 110 tom' wo the I� min purpose for this land. The lasses forthor 1ltIK aMitlan to ills oforemationed consideration, they will maintain to* gtag ai"i"I the grans, MItIft . the weeds and keeping the property clear of I ttW a tM We of the tow** The only purpose for which the losses by use MI s #1 to to plant a ve06111#1 4 garden and there shot be no storage, parking er itW eee of this property W t losses. .fad is it fir sows by sal Msww of N mow the above Momois sd ps, Eemb w AW61% qMt�, s* �► � { twA{o► �r ire N lentil say of the wave hovda swttrlss/, tilrtMt.as1 M M Xw i ► LM, N . ft'abi sat tabs peawisw of as awls rsrr/s"Mr-, tis11 a>f,Mr qtr aides M�MrIIw> �.+► n..awria/ wet l • /widow of w mar r ip ps1i t 1Yr+MMt6 toM lw'!M l IV wSt Lome— fo r of fta artw of obis Less. lad the aid "byes._ step s vemons...a.asd soft& op seed solo w A" "W_ to set & tltr Laos, a sadw1w ells ob" Waal Psraw s► sal► ws ANW, Mot Ar+M tllr 1M t+IMtU1ag of as said Leer....., a" thee. _ le.._.uiti„ as ohs sspiralim of #0 ave sr howls reef W. �4i�► rlsir� M� obwonda ohs Storm" >wftim of as said Lear....., ,._ hL.hsie N1L assip>,, to as psi suttM6s► awl ,+speir of WAss..._,lld.._.. mb them, nassasO cars► sat see sat damp w the &M"a awn a*W0 A Jed ohs am Lsesr...... do ..._moomia slid the sett Lass_., so JAM# efts "al sad /srJYrwiry tea sswaoats sf snrsotd, ASS ant rnsgr psssssu r sat tug&* hasp, UM spat oft As no Noised prrNMaa for the Nnw sfpwatd. in 9tabuef ilhbittat.:sell peptise hew h"uats 0 ship heats and assts of dye sat PW it W s8ow usitaa. C I TY OF ""0 atlaid, 8eslsd and D#Umvd In lrreeaea of r (ss j�' Mayor City Manager - (sil) Fterntan Sehrupp (rsa10 (rstt� A ' April 11, 1990 To Whom It May Concern: s We are requesting blacktopping on Westedge Boulevard. from the railroad 'bridge to Lynwood Boulevard. The road has slot of traffic which creates a nigh level of dust. We have tried the dust abatements, which only ei-iminates D mf tl o prcN em for 3 snort period of time. Pot Holes and Ruts are always a continual problem, oecause of tae and rain. This roan is on the Mounu and iinnetrista border line,, which we nope will not hinder the property owners from receiving tte blacktop tnat we feei is a necessity. is Enclosed is the petition for the request. A copy has been sent to the Cite of PAi'nnetrista, Your Prompt attention to this matter wili be greatly appreciated. Sincerely. Westedge Boulevard Residents • 1e10(a . � f . � f . ■ f i :# ' � � ® \ y / 9 IAOI P R O P O S A L FROM: ftstonka Area Chamber of Commerce Beautification of Shoreline Drive Committee RE: Matching Funds for Plantings RECO APR 16 " DATE: April 9, 1990 ------------------------------- - ------ ----------- --- ------------ The Beautification Committee will be asking the Cities of Mound, Orono, and Spring Park to participa�.a in a matching funds program to encourage plantings along Shoreline Drive. We are asking each Of the Cities to dedicate $3,000 or $4,000, but feel that a minimum of $2,000 per City is essential for the program to have any impact. We would recommend that the Cities consider naming a particular nursery as being a plantings provider and ask that the nursery then bill the City directly for their portion of the matching funds program. The Committee recommends the following matching fund plan rules: I. The matching funds would be available to residential or commercial land owners abutting Shoreline Drive /County Road 15. Any plants purchased with matching funds must be visible from the street, and cannot be used to enhance property owners' off - street or back -lot areas. 2. The property owner would be responsible for all maintenance including watering and trimming of any plantings purchased using City funds. 3. Plantings purchased using matching funds must be consistent with the overall Beautification Plan and are to be planted within the aesthetic frame work of the plan. 4. The matching funds are available only for the purchase of live plants, not for the purchase of improvements such as fences, planters, or painting existing fences or retaining walls. 5. Each parcel of land or property owner is entitled to claim matching funds up to a ceiling of $200 per land owner /property. 6. The funds will be made available on a first -come first -serve basis, and the program will either expire upon exhaustion of all of the matching funds in each of the Cities or June 17, 1990, whichever comas first. If each City chooses, they may elect to expand the matching fund program at any time. C , /61 ot sss /414-8940 11 January, 1990 Westonka Chamber of Commerce, 5600 Lynwood Drive, Nound, COST ESTIMATE FOR SHORELINE DRIVE BEAUTIFICATION PROJDCT The following estimate of costs to implement the shoreline Drive Beautification Project is information shown on the Design Concept Drawings. Pricing does not include grading, demoli Contractor's General Conditions, contingencies or design fees. painted steek UNIT COST TOTALS FOR EACH CITY 84275 252 ALLOWANCE FOR CONTRACTORS GENERAL CONDITIONS, 21069. CONTINGENCY AND DESIGN FEES FOR THE ITEMS SHOWN --- - - - - -- RECOMMENDED BUDGET FOR EACH CITY BASED ON THE DRAWINGS 105344 • - - -- --City of Mound---------- -City of Spri * - --- Sheet- --- - -- . * ------ Sheet- ---- -- Unit * -1- -1- -3- -4- Item Item * -4- -5- -6- -7• Cost * Totals $ * * Sargent Juniper 30 * 10 0 0 0 10 300 * 0 0 46 15t 24" dia cost grwn Isanti Dogwood hedge 20 * 353 1063 603 186 2205 44100 * 308 826 666 80` 24" ht cont grwn Redtwig Dogwood 20 * 0 0 0 65 65 1300 * 0 0 0 36" ht coat grwn Littleleaf Linden 275 * 16 0 0 0 16 4400 * 10 27 13 26 3" cal BB Marshall's Ash 250 * 1 27 0 0 28 7000 * 29 0 25 1 3" cal BB Colorado Spruce 250 * 3 0 0 3 6 1500 * 12 0 28 •` 6' ht BB Eastern Redcedar 75 * 55 0 0 0 55 4125 * 0 0 0 4' ht BB Willow 50 * 0 0 0 8 8 400 * 5 0 0 1" cal cont grwn Crabapple 175 * 0 0 48 0 48 8400 * 0 23 20 0 1.5" cal BB Scotch Pine 250 * 0 0 0 0 0 0* 12 0 0 C 6' ht BB Shoreline Shrubs 20 * 0 0 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 100 3' ht cont grwn Prairie Restoration 5000 * 0 0 1 0 0 5000 * 0 0 0 C grasses and flowers Banners 250 * 11 15 0 5 31 7750 • 5 5 3 1C cloth w /image, hanger Metal Grille 35 * 0 0 0 0 0 0* 0 100 340 27G painted steek UNIT COST TOTALS FOR EACH CITY 84275 252 ALLOWANCE FOR CONTRACTORS GENERAL CONDITIONS, 21069. CONTINGENCY AND DESIGN FEES FOR THE ITEMS SHOWN --- - - - - -- RECOMMENDED BUDGET FOR EACH CITY BASED ON THE DRAWINGS 105344 lt18OL0'PIOx M0. 90 RMLW 'q To SW LIDM SURPLUS FUNDS, Mw LMD IN in rO' u r In Tn CAPInL I1[PltO11i Ma l Dom'! rDD•IC> "MD volt C"XnL a AM NWOlt PFAUBM APPROTM BY 2= CITY COUNCIL UBRM, the City of Mound has a Capital Improvements Service Fund which acoounts for all assessment projects and bonds issued before 1978; and WNMUM a surplus has accumulated primarily due to interest earned on investments, due to prepayment of assessments (arbitrage) ; and the City Council authorized in 1989 to call in all bonds outstanding in the fund; and and; willtslt8, there is no debt outstanding as of 3 -1 -90, ltiilt3M8, there is no stipulation or constrictions on what to do with this surplus which means the balance in this fund could be used at the Council's discretion. VOW, 'PMXRXIOU, U IT Ai8OLOiD, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, dcas hereby set aside surplus funds in the Capital Improvements Debt Service Fund now and in the future, in a Capital Projects funds for Capital Improvements and major projects. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: Maymr • Attest: City Clerk 1 /OL /O For April 24, 1990 Council Meeting April 17, 1990 LICENSE RENEWALS -- Expire April 30, 1990. New License Period May 1, 1990 to April 30, 1991. Approval contingent upon all required forms, insurance, etc. being turned in. Bowling 8 Lanes - Mound Lanes b Pizza --- NOTICE OF ABATEMENT SENT TO OWNER FOR DEBRIS & JUNK VEHICLES Games of Skill (NOTICE ATTACHED) 3 -- Al & Alma's 10 -- Mack's Jock Club Juke Box 1 -- American Legion 1 -- Mack's Jock Club 1 -- VFW #5113 Pool Table 4 -- Mack's Jock Club 2 -- VFW #5113 Restaurant Al & Alma's American Legion #398 Domino's Pizza #1974 Happy Garden Hardee's House of Moy Mack's Jock Club Mound Lanes & Pizza- -- SEE ABOVE Scotty B's Subway Sandwiches VFW #5113 is • rI 11 w) CITY Of INI O U N U M OUND. ' MINNE A 553bol 1612) 472.1Iss NOTICE OF NUISANCE ABATEMENT YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that you are maintaining a public nuisance on your property at 2346 Cypress Lane, Mound, Minnesota 55364, legally described as Lots 10 to 17 Incl., Block 3, Shirley Hills Unit F, PID #13- 117 -24 -34 0044. The nuisance Is exterior storage of the following Items, but not limited toe' 12+ tires, a 4'x8' woW'mn box• metal, snow blower parts, broken yard rakes• truck tailgate, cons, paper debris roll of wire mesh pile of drain tile pipe, square metal wash tub, rope, smashed garbage can, camper topper, wooden pallets, brush, metal storm door frame, plastic bottle, cardboard boxes, plastic pall, carpet, bolts, phone book, metal electrical box, conduit light fixture, and other miscellaneous debris. There sre four derelict vehicles perked on your property, as follows, 1) a 2 door Chevy license ONHH 215 HN '88, 2) a 4 door Plymouth I I cense BPCR 421 MN '88, a 4 door Cad 1 I 1 oc IICcnse #DRL 902 MN '89, and 4) a 2 door Dodge license #656 BAD MN '89. Th1s exterior storage is In violation of City Code Sections 1000, 23.702 and 23.703. in addltlon, you do not have address numbers on your building which 1s In violation of City Code Section 330,130. By not complying with these City Codes you are also In violation of your Conditional Use Permit. THE8E NUIRANCES MUST BE ABATED BY MAY 9, 1990. YOU MUST DO THE FOLLOWING BY MAY 9. 1990 TO ABATE THE NUISANCESt remove the above listed exterior storage from the property and Install property address numbers at 2346 Cypress Lane, Hound, Minnesota, 55364. PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF MOUND AT 472 -1155 WHEN YOU HAVE ABATED THE NUISANCE. If these nuisances are not abated by May 9, 1990, the CIty Council wilt consider whether to order these nuisances abated by City Staff at the Mound Clti Council meeting at Hound City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, on May 22, 1990 at 700 p.m. You may appear at that meeting to discuss the matter with the Council. If the Council orders City Staff to abate the nuisances, the City has the right to assess the cost of abatement against your property. CITY OF MOUND 1W JAN BERTRAND Enforcement Official 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 (612) 472 -1155 :�'z210 Dated /j/4 BILLS - - - - -- -APRIL 24, 1990 BATCH 0041 82,541.54 BATCH 0042 94,241,37 Gen Comm Uniden Control Station 1,260.20 Thurk Bros. Car Repair 135.59 SuperAmerica March gasoline 2,115.68 TOTAL BILLS 180,300.38 f is • I-1/ib /J/y M t PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4/12/90 M- CO2.O1 CITY OF I= TIME 21.15.57 VENDOR DNVOICE ME HOLD PRE -PAID CHECK NO. MICE NMt DATE DATE STATUS MOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCmNT NIAUER MQNT CHECK D DATE 10549 PRE-MID 556.63 L.IQ 71- 1100 -9510 4/12/90 4/12/90 506.63 AL-CD 1010 586.63 30416 4/10/90 ELLIOY CO/OATION VEN000 TOTAL 586.63 105" PRE -PAID 204.00 BOX LIMER FOR TRI( 01-4340 -2200 4/12/90 4/12/90 204.00 AL-0 1010 204.00 303% 4/00/90 1110 HEEL AMTO STOPS VENDiNU TOTAL 204.00 00010 NE -PAID 3,700.00 CR ANION 3/31 PR 01-2040 -0000 4/12/90 4/72/90 3,700.00 JK-0 1010 3706.00 30408 4/06/90 CITY COUNTY CREDIT UNION VEN>NM TOTAL 3)01.00 00917 PRE -PAID 34.30 NXIC1-PALS OW Ot- 4140 -4120 t7.25 NNICI-PN.S (MEET 71 -7100 -4120 17.23 HINICI -PALS MIOET 22- 4170 -4110 5.75 O NICI-W W ET 01- 4200 -4120 5.75 R NICI-PALS DANDIFY 73- 7300-4110 5.75 NNTCI -PALS SALT 78- 7800-4120 4/12/90 4/12/00 56.23 JK-CO 1010 86.25 30393 4/03/90 CITY OF UNITE EAR LK VENDOR TOTAL 56.25 C1001 FIE-MID 2,103.07 SIT 3/31 PR 01-2040.OWD 4/12/90 4/12/90 2,403.07 AL-CD 1010 2403.87 30401 4/06/90 CODIISSIOV OF WAKE VENmt TOTAL 2403.87 C1118 PIE -PAID 130.00 AIR /DEMO 01- 4340 -4110 4/11/90 4/11/90 138.00 JK-CD 1010 138.00 30395 4/03/40 CRYSTAL TRAVEL. SERVICE VOmU TOTAL 130.00 01235 PIE -PAID 1,317.60 DENTAL 3/31 PR 01- 2040.0000 t6.20 OENTAL - RETIREE 01- 41WIS10 41.60 DENTAL -RETIREE 01- 4200-1510 41.60 DENTAL -RETIREE 01- 4140 -1510 57.00 DENTAL -RETIREE 71-7100 -7310 4/12/90 4/12/90 1,474.00 JK-CD 1010 1474.80 30413 4/06/90 DELTA DENTAL %0= TOTAL 1474.00 11340 PIE -PAID 9.00 POLICE LIC PLATES 01- 4140-4140 4/12/90 4/12/90 9.00 JK_m 1010 9.00 30398 4/04/90 DRIVER S VEHICLE SERVICES VENDOM TOTAL 9.00 E1429 PREPAID 671.10 LID 71-7100 -9510 65.25 NINE 71-7140-9520 13.42- DISC 71- 7100 -9560 4/12/90 4112/90 722.93 JIK-CD 1010 =2 3 30309 4/03/90 PREPAID 342.87 L1Q 71-7100 -9510 coy/ 126.95 NINE 11-7100 -9520 3. /J/y PAGE 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL 4H#/! its AP- 102.01 CITY OF NOIO TILE 21.tS. VENDOR INVOICE RE HOLD ME -MAID am NO. INVOICE M DATE DATE STATUS AROUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT Nim AIONT CNEO(1 D111E 6.85- 0190 71-7100.9660 4/11/90 4/12/90 461.91 JRIL-CO 1010 462.97 30419 4/10/90 ED PHILLIPS 6 CIS VENDOR TOTAL 1185.00 F1722 PIE -PAID 200.00 TIRE ROT SEMINAR 01-4010-4110 130.00 TINE Riff SENINA R 01-409044110 130.00 TIME Riff IENIINR 01- 4310-4110 50.00 TIRE Riff SEMINAR 01-4140-4110 4/12/90 4/12/90 550.00 JRIL -CD 1010 350.00 30425 4111/90 FRAIILIN INTERNAT'L INBTI# VEOON TOTAL =.00 618" FIE -MID 39.95 RAN INTER COOLER 01- 4140.4100 35.65 RAN 070 CDDLEt 01- 4090-2200 6.93 RRR WATER COOLER 01. 4280-2200 2.84 0 WATER COOLER 73.7300-2200 2.83 NA R INTEL COD 78- 7000-2200 4/12/90 4/12/90 81.40 JRNL -ta 1010 88.10 30423 4/10190 DLEDm imum VDOOI TOTAL 86.40 01953 PRE -PAID 1,355.00 DEF CONP 3/31 PR 01-2040-0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 1,355.00 JRIL -0 1010 1395.00 30106 4/06/90 GNAT NEST LIFE AGIRVEE VENDOR TOTAL 1355.00 61971 PRE -PAID 21.80 IOW 3/31 Mt 01- 2040-0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 21.80 J11L-CD 1010 21.80 30411 4/06/90 DAMP HEAT" FLAIR VENDOR TOTAL 21.80 61972 PREPAID 753.53 LID 71-7100-9510 233.31 MINE 71. 7100-9520 28.64- DIM 71-7100-9560 13.76 FAT 71-7100-9600 85.50 Nil 71-7100-9540 4112/90 4/12/90 1,057.66 JSL-CD 1010 1057.66 30307 4103/90 PRE -PAID 236.83 LID 71- 7100.9510 446.67 MINE 71-7100 -9320 13.71- DISC 71- 7100-9560 11.31 FRT 71- 7100.9600 4/12/90 4/11/90 683.10 JRNL-CD 1010 663.10 30417 4/10/90 ORIODS COM i CONPANI VENDOR TOTAL 1740.76 "2145 PIE -PAID 280.46 Do 3/31 PR 01- 2040-0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 286.46 J%-CD 1010 288.46 30407 4/06/90 VEIN CO 11PPOtT i COLLECT+ VOW TOTAL 288.46 12301 PE -PAID 312.90 OEF OW IC1NA 3/31 PR 01-2040-0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 512.90 JRII -CD 1010 512.90 30404 4/06/90 ICFA RETIIElENT TRUST -437 VEIOOR TOTAL 312.90 is !j r5 is /4T}'/(i PAIR 3 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4/12/90 0. 102 -01 CITY OF RDURO TIME 21.13.57 IEIH001 MICE DIE HOLD PRE -PAID an 10. INVOICE N IR DATE DATE PARE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUIIER ANNNT DWI DATE 12304 PIE -MID 91.98 ICNA 3131 PR 01- 2040 -OOM 4/12/90 4/12/90 91.98 JRNL-CO 1010 91.98 30403 4/06/90 no IETIIETENT TRUST -401 VENADOIf TOTAL 91.98 J2532 PIE -PAID 5.95 RETAIL COUNCIL LUNCH 01- 4040-4120 5.95 VAL WKIL UID 01- 4140 -4120 4/12/90 4/12/90 11.90 JR1L-CD 1010 11.90 30421 4/10/90 JKK CLUI %ow TOTAL 11.90 J2571 PRE -PAID 110.50 17 COIIRACT NOUNS 01- 4340-3100 4/12/90 4/12/90 110.50 JRHL -0 1010 110.50 30092 4/03/90 JDNN TAIR VOb1 TOTAL 110.50 JM9 PRE -PAIN 2,081.72 LIO 71- 7100 -9S10 1,751.45 DIME 71- 7100-90 11.24- lm 72-7100.9560 4/12/90 4/12/90 3,781.93 AL-0 1010 3781.93 30308 4/03/90 PIE -KID 1,0.41 LIQ 71- 71004510 256.80 NINE 71- 7100-9520 36.21- DISC 71- 7100.9560 4/1200 4/12/93 1.900.00 JNDL -CD 1010 1903.00 30418 4/10/90 AM 010101GRA E LIO VI7081 TOTAL 5694.93 1.2817 PIE -MID 44.00 UNION 3/31 PR 01- 2040.0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 44.00 JRNL -CD 1010 44.00 30414 4/06/90 IN BF'QCEIOIT LAW OW VENDOR TOTAL 44.00 N30If1 HOE -MID 10,636.40 FIT 3131 PR 01- 2040-0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 10.636.40 AL-0 1010 10636.40 30400 4/06/90 WWII ra - NOUQ VENDDN TOTAL 10636.40 mm PIE -MID 97.94 HOOP 3/31 PR 01 -2040 -0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 97.94 JIL-0 1010 97.81 30412 4/06/90 a (ENTER WAIN 9 194/9 Vk7m TOTAL 97.94 0170 PIE -MID 594.00 WID SAC 78- 2304 -0000 4/12/90 4/12/90 304.00 ,AL-0 1010 594.00 30391 4/031 0 IETIO MR COTI10. CM* YOM TOTAL WOO 943401 PRE -PAID 288.00 DTF COP 3131 PR 01-2040-0000 4112/90 4/12/90 208.00 JRNL -CD 1010 208.00 30406 4/06/90 M RETIREMENT SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL 288.00 am PRE -MID 645.65 UNION 3/31 PR 01- 2040-0000 4/12/40 4/11/90 645.65 JlW-CD 1010 645.65 30413 4/06/90 is /4T}'/(i PAR 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4/12/10 W-M-01 CITY OF Ia10 TIRE 21.15.57 UWIIIR I"IOL OUE HOLD PRE -PAID G6EK 10. 1NYOICE M DATE OATS STATUS MOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N1JW MOUNT CHECV t DATE M TEAMSTERS LOCAL 310 VENOO1 TOTAL 645.65 • P3930 ME -PAID 6,552.37 PERA 3131 PR 01- 2040-0000 4/12/10 4/12/90 6,552.37 J1K-CD 1010 6552.37 30402 4!06/00 E R A VFj= TOTAL 6552.37 P4010 FIE-MID 52.20 COPIES -= 90 -909 01- 4100 -1200 4112190 4/12190 $2.20 JRNL -CD 1010 52.20 30394 4/03/90 PHOTO FACTORY YE DOt TOTAL 55.20 P4030 PIE -PAID 516.68 PHI 3/31 PR 01-2040-0000 4/12/90 4/12/0 516.38 JBL-CO 1010 516.58 30410 4/06/90 PHYSICIANS w M On TOTAL 516.38 8171 PE-AID 1,685.18 LIO 71- 7100 -9510 007.73 NINE 71-7100 -9510 42.02-010C 71- 7100 -9360 411210 4/12/90 2,%D.59 AL-CD 1010 2550.89 30390 4/03/90 FE-MID 2,050.07 LIC 71- 7100 -9510 117.65 NINE 71-7100 -9520 41.21- DISC 71.7100 -9560 4/1210 4/12/90 2,125.51 JR►L -CD 1010 2125.51 30420 4/10/90 WITT NINE t SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL 4676.40 54499 PE -PAID 23,160.21 1 T TRiL7(-PAW 60- 6000 -MM 4/1210 4/12/90 23,160.21 JNL-CD 1010 23160.21 30397 4/03/00 STAIN -NEST m/aD8 00 TOTAL 23160.21 54511 FE-MID 508.92 ^R UNION 3/31 M 01- 2040 -0000 4/12/90 4/11/90 508.92 AL-CO 1010 508.92 30409 4/06/90 STATE CAPITOL 081T UNION VENDOR TOTAL 308.92 T4770 PIE -MID 13,626.90 HAIR DEER 71-7100-9530 4/11/90 4/12/90 13,626.90 AL-CO 1010 1.%%.90 30424 4/10/90 TIaE DISTRImmo CO mw TOTAL 13626.90 ib100 PE -PAID 64.88 ICI TOWELS 01- 4290-2250 151.25 NO RUBS 01- 4200 -M 147.15 00 UDNIFNI5 01 -4280 -2240 29.43 II ARCH U IFOONS 01-4290 -2240 75.21 IIARON UNIF0116 73- 7300 -2240 75.21 MACH UNIFORM 78-7900-2240 2.86 RANCH RAGS M- 4170-2 4/12/90 4/12/90 545.99 J1IL -CUT 1010 545.99 30422 4/10/90 UNITOO RENTAL SYSTEIN YOM TOTAL 545.99 • 1A11 PAGE S PURCHASE JOURNAL DAIS 4/12/00 AP- 001-01 CITY OF ROUND TIME 21.15.31 VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -MID OEM NO. INVOICE NRDR DATE DATE STATUS ARDUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT HUGER AMOUNT OEM 1 DATE 45445 PRE -PAID 343.00 AIR/OALLAS/HARRELL 01 -4140 -4110 4/12/90 4/12/90 343.00 JRWL -CD 1010 343.00 303!9 4/04/90 INTERS TRAVEL SM OF WAY# VENDOR TOTAL 343.00 TOTAL ALL VENODftS 8:,541.54 t 2,1r 01.40lh38� 71.1111.1 7!•!!l0►?tS1 7M'MDi -3q0 1010 Ol -0*2146 01- 4090.2100 01. 4114.2100 01-41f1.2180 Ot- 41M2100 01.4210 n- 71*210 t�71SF2t01 >t- 7111 -bo1 22. 4170.2100 1010 01.40W2200 01.1190.0000 1010 01-4200.4200 73- 7300.4200 78- 7800 -4200 1010 01- 4290-2250 1010 01- 4280-3750 01- 4290.3750 22 -4170 -3750 1010 71-7100-2200 1010 01- 4140-2200 01-2300-0220 01 -4270 -NM 01- 4064-2200 Oo y2, r If.J X7014 ►ASI 1 tURCNASE ��11 W-M-01 C1TT OF 0E10111 VENDOR INVOICE ME HID ND. INVOICE 10110 DATE DATE STATUS AIBANT OESCRI►TTOI AM 2,510.00 1919 AUDIT 910.00 1981 AMIT 890.00 1919 MANIT 890.00 Im MIT 4/18190 4/10/90 3,300.00 ,AL-M AIDO 4I10 i EICK VENDOR TOTAL 3300.00 A0060 13.36 OFFICE SUPRIES 4.31 OFFICE BURIES 13.10 OFFICE SIPRIES 5.73 OFFICE U LIES 4.31 OFFICE WRIES 2.10 OFFICE SIMMS 2.11 SPFtCE SINRVEB 2.11 OFFICE BUMUES 2.11 OFFICE SWIM 67.13 OFFICE IR M.IES 4/18/90 4/18/90 117.16 AL-0 ACRD -RN VENDOR TOTAL 117.16 A0350 23.00 RANT - OF 25.00 RANI - OF - NOM 4/18/10 4/18/90 10.00 ,AIL -CD AN1i0AS FLOC VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 Nut 30.00 NAT MINCING LEAK 30.00 IMT PIMMING Low 30.00 MT IMIND LEASE 4/18/90 4/18/90 90.00 JRNL-CD BUIP MINNESOTA COPANT VENDOR TOTAL 90.00 10539 117.14 BATTERY SPRAT 4/18/90 4/18190 117.14 JIL-CD BATTER i TINE MISE,IIt VENDOR TOTAL 117.14 10600 44.52 MAR GARM-CANS 103.81 NAR OARM-PW 65.72 NAR QW&W -FIRE 4/18/90 4118/90 214.12 JK-CD KACKONIAK AND SON VDDOR TOTAL 214.12 00430 16.50 3-4-5 WINDOW CLEAN 4/18/90 4/18/90 16.50 JOL -CD CITYWIDE WINNOW SERVICES VENDOR TOTAL 16.50 10960 8.99 LETTERS i MADERB 63.12 BOOTH MATERIALS 4.20 TAPE, KEYS 5.39 SEAL TAPE 01.40lh38� 71.1111.1 7!•!!l0►?tS1 7M'MDi -3q0 1010 Ol -0*2146 01- 4090.2100 01. 4114.2100 01-41f1.2180 Ot- 41M2100 01.4210 n- 71*210 t�71SF2t01 >t- 7111 -bo1 22. 4170.2100 1010 01.40W2200 01.1190.0000 1010 01-4200.4200 73- 7300.4200 78- 7800 -4200 1010 01- 4290-2250 1010 01- 4280-3750 01- 4290.3750 22 -4170 -3750 1010 71-7100-2200 1010 01- 4140-2200 01-2300-0220 01 -4270 -NM 01- 4064-2200 Oo y2, r If.J X7014 • /ZZD PACE 2 PURCNASE JOURNAL AP- 002-01 CITY OF mu TM I!.lf4A yew I VOICE ME HMD PAME-PAIO am W. 1M0lCE NIMi DATE DATE STATUS MW DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT WIER AMOUNT ow 1 DANE 30.83 NNM ND1E SUPPLIES 01- 4290-2200 7.24 w "m SUPPLIES 01- 4280-2:00 18.36 w WK SUPPLIES 01- 4340 -22M 19.% NAR NDNE SIPPIIES 73.7300 M 82.85 PAR NOTE MIES 22- 4170 -2200 3.63 SNIPPING ClWa 73-7300-3210 4/18/90 4118/90 253.85 J1LL-0 1010 COAST TD COAST YEN= TOTAL 253.85 00990 545.25 11ARZ1N COP= 01. 4095 -3000 907.00 N" COPUTER 01-4095-5000 4/!8/90 4/18/90 1,452.25 JILL-0 1010 tOPUIOSEABICE INC VEIEOR TOTAL 1452.25 01010 97.18 PAVER AFFAIR 22- 4170-3820 4/18/90 4/18/90 9748 J4l-CO 1010 C018MICATION AUDITOR VEIEOI TOTAL 97.18 C1078 32.00 TELE SERVICE 01- 4320 -3220 4/18/90 4/18/90 52.00 JRNL-CD 1010 CWIIENTAL MOM SE" VDOOR TOTAL 52.00 01079 223.38 TEII W 01-4140 -3220 121.90 TBJ P M 01- 4320 -3220 5.25 TELEPW 01- 4010-3220 2.32 TELEPIOE 01-4340 -3220 2.36 TE1941K 01- 4190 -3220 10.42 TELOW 01-4095 -3220 64.88 TBBW Ot- 4280 -3220 119.69 TELEPHK 73. 7300.3220 32.45 TB OWN 78- 7800 -3220 63.38 TELEPM W 01-4340 -3220 145.81 TERM 71-7100-3220 65.68 TELEP W 22- 4170 -3220 67.70 TE MM- COPUMER 22-4170-3220 4/18/90 4/18/90 1,125.24 AL-M 1010 CONTINENTAL TEIE W YBW TOTAL 1125.24 C1130 86.50 am 22- 4170-2200 4/18/90 4!18/90 86.50 JILL-CD 1010 CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS VENBIOt TOTAL 86.50 D1332 299.40 CHORINE 73- 7300 -2260 4118/90 4118/90 299.40 At-CD 1010 UPC MISTRIES, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 299.40 D1350 120.58 U HkL TRIU]c RENTAL 41- 4320 -2200 4/18/ 4/18/90 120.38 JlK -CD 1010 • /ZZD / ZZ 1 tN PUICNAll d NL CITY w INNI VEN�1 INXICE RE N" ND. MSICE W OATS DATE STATIE MANY ExIIPTI01 ACCDIIIT NI1� Al MIME`S 66 SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 120.38 E1401 2,863.90 CONVERT 1840 22- 4110.8000 2,601.90 COMM 1843 01.1140 - 8000 4/18/90 4/18/90 5,463.00 AL-0 1010 EMERGENCY VENICLE SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 5465.80 F15 155.32 MOO 71- 7100.2200 4/18/90 4/18/90 155.32 JW-CO 1010 1 FOLK PAPER COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 155.32 F1711 260.15 IATI FIT 71 - 71f `400 4/18/90 4/18/90 260.13 JILO 1010 FOANDSS TRICKING VEM TOTAL 260.15 61831 1,095.66 PIIFTow 11.1100 -2300 4/18/90 4/18/40 1,095.66 AL-0 1010 GENERAL WAIN SERVICE %9W TOTAL 1095.66 01906 45.00 MO ONE CALL SERV 73- 7300.4200 1/18/90 4/18/90 45.00 JK-CD 1010 00 0 STATE K-CALL, INC VETEOR TOTAL 45.00 01930 104.00 114 N01cSNDP- MID,NG,NR,NC,RDT 01- 4140.4110 4/16/90 4/18/90 104.00 JAL-0 1010 GOVT MINING SERVICES VEIN TOTAL 104.00 m A KTW 8.00 DRILL HOLES 01.4310.3820 4118/90 4/18/90 8.00 AL-0 1010 IEMSEL MACHINE 910P VENDOR TOTAL 8.00 H2120 7.30 MAN POSTAL VERIF 01- 4060.3210 4/18.190 4/18/90 7.50 JNL•CD 1010 001 CO DEPT OF MERIT T VENDOR TOTAL 7.50 M2170 27,216.70 901 OF CITY COST - 110 6 15 30- 6000.4100 4/18/90 4/18/90 27,216.70 JK -CD 1010 MM CO TREASURER VENDOR TOTAL 27216.70 12302 25.00 WHO MESH 01-4190 -4130 4/16190 4/18/90 25.00 JRIL-CD 1010 IN" VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 12421 590.00 APR JANITOR SERVICE 01-4320 -4210 50.66 APR JANITOR SERVICE -PN 01- 4280 -4200 50.67 APR JANITOR SERVICE-PN 73- 7300 -4200 / ZZ 1 r - 1 L---j /22 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL 101E 4/15/90 M�CO2.01 CITY OF 10110 TINE 15.04.38 NEN)N>R IMIOICE SUE HOLD NE-otl 01D M. MICE m 101E BAR STATUA3 MOUNT IESCR1►TION ACCOUNT NUMIER AROUNT ow 0 GATE 10.67 APR JRNITOF _:AVICE-PN 78- 7800.4:00 4 /18 9 0 4110!90 742.00 JNL -0 1010 J 0 S CLEANIND CO. %am TOTAL 742.00 JWO 4.35 SM EV-011LET 01-4IW4110 4/18/90 4/18/00 4.35 JML-CD 1010 AM ICKINLET VETMOt TOTAL 4.31 KWI 871.50 CAILE TIES 01-4280 -2300 129.06 0190 SMS,WSM 01-4290 -2310 4/18190 4118/90 1,001.46 JK-CD lot0 MR Flews Am TOTAL 1001.46 LMI 130.00 210 97N N/C 01-1020-3604 70.00 210 VTR N/C 01-4040 -3600 70.00 210 VTR N/C 014090-3600 4,762.10 2ND VTR N/C 01-4110 -3600 271.00 2ND VTR N/C 01- 4190-3600 3,071.00 210 VTR N/C 01-4280-3600 257.10 210 VIA N/C 01. 4290-3600 742.50 210 QTR N/C 01-4340-3600 1,000.00 2ND VTR NR 22 -4170 -3600 461.00 210 QTR NR 71 887.50 210 QTR N/C 73- 7300-3600 •1,250.00 2!0 QTR N/C 78- 7800-3600 4/18/ 4/18/90 14,981.00 JRNL-CD 1010 LEAD E OF 10 CITIES 115 TO VENDOR TOTAL 14 1.2910 15.85 CLIP OUT W 01-4020-2100 4/18190 4/18/90 15.85 JRNL -0 1010 LINDA STRONG VENDOI TOTAL 15.83 1 LM 50.82 CARS 01- 4340 -2310 7.79 PIN 01-4340-3820 4/18/90 4il8/90 38.61 JAL-CD 1010 LONG LAZE FORD TRACTOR VENDOR TOTAL 18.61 L.29V 62.91 MM AUTO SUl'PL 22. 4110 -2200 24.26 MAR AUTO SUPPL 01-4310-2300 1,324.78 RAR AUTO SUPPL 01-4290 -2310 4/181 4/18190 1,411.95 JK-ID tolo LOWELL'S AUTODTIVE /IITCO# VENDOR TOTAL 1411.95 830/0 170.00 MAY ENFORS RAINT, AUTO TRANSFR 01- 40 -3800 41181 4/18/90 170.00 JML-CD 1010 NABTS WORATION '1EW TOTAL 170.00 "3080 30.00 MAR ENGR- PARTS 01 - 4340 - ?100 r - 1 L---j /22 P� 5 PURCHASE JOURNAL NATE 4 /11/9 1 0 M- 002-01 CITY OF MID TIME 15.54.!! VMOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -MID am I0. INVOICE ON OATS DATE STATUE A1DUB MESCRIPTION ACCOU4' MINER MOUNT ow O GATE 45.00 MAR ENR -HATER 73-73W. - 3100 1,755.00 W DO -SEIER 78- 780 { - 3100 30.00 1IAR W- STREET 01-4284.3100 120.00 MAR E1DR- PLAN, INr 01- 4140-3100 150.00 MAR EMR- C1ES1111r RD 01-41 -3100 46.00 MAR EN/R -1990 MIEDIIE 81-4310 -5300 90.00 11N ENGR- DEIRIGN- A69E95 26 -11 -0000 561.00 MM so -MEMO 26 -5790 -3100 30.00 11R EMR -79 STREET 26 -5)00 -3100 60.00 MAR 00 -78 STREET 26-570OJI00 452.00 MAP ENO R -1990 KAI.COAT 27- 5800-3100 4/18/90 4/18/90 3,369.00 ,AL -0 1010 II;COIr6 FRANK BOOS A0 le VENDOR TOTAL 3369.00 N3120 59.91 POINT5,001 QL4,ETC 22. 41702200 4/18/90 4/18/90 59.91 jK-CD 1010 NMI$ EWIP1ENT CO YNOR TOTAL 59.91 N3206 100.00 IMIALT 73- 7300-2340 4/18/90 4/18/90 100.00 AL-CD 1010 NINUT ASP AT COP VENDOR TOTAL 180.00 N3207 96.% SCAENS,COIPLERS,ETC 01 -4290 -2310 4/18/90 4/18/90 %.% JNNL -CD 1010 WHIM IOLT i 9lPPlY VENDOR TOTAL 96. N3240 29.98 APR F ADER RELIT 01- 41403950 4/18/90 4/18190 29.91 JRNL -CO 1010 "INN CONM VENDOR TOTAL 29.98 mm 217.48 11N GAS 01 43203720 530.27 11N GAS 01- 43403720 140.01 LIAR ON 01- 4280.3720 164.71 MAR GAS 73- 73003720 107.06 MAR ON 78- 78003720 365.06 MAR GAS 22- 4170 -VN 84.51 MAR GAS 71- 71003720 4/18/90 4/18/00 1,669.90 JRNL -0 1010 NINNEGW VENDOR TOTAL 1669.90 "3289 393.60 WS,IEI.IETS,VALVE INSERT 22- 4170 -2200 4/18/90 4/18190 393.60 ik -CD 1010 1!1 CON FIRE 4 SAFETY VENDOR TOTAL 393.60 N3681 34.00 L OG IC WNT- JAN -MAR 01- 41403840 4/18/90 4/18/90 39.00 JlK -CD 1010 NATL CO SYSTEMS VEN W TOTAL 39.00 • Izz3 • /z -ay PAVE 6 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4118/90 4PB -01 CITY OF MW TIME 15.54.53 ww INVOICE DIE HOLD PFE -PAID CHECK NO. INVOICE NMR DATE DATE STATUS MOUNT DESCRIPTION ACM X1 WW AMOUNT CAEM 8 DATE N3710 14.28 MR HDIE 01 -42 -2200 32.09 FOR HOLE 01-4290-2390 40.18 RAR HOME 78- 7800 -MM 11.79 NAR HONE 73-7340-2300 4/18190 4/18/90 98.34 JRX-CD 1010 WAM1E I AMM YOM TOTAL 98.31 MM3U100 341.71 MAR ELECTRICITY 01 -4280 -3710 112.22 MAR ELECTRICITY 01- 4310-3710 384.84 MMR ELECTRICITY 01 -4320 -3710 273.69 MMR ELECTRICITY 71- 7100 -3710 226.55 MMR ELECTRICITY 22-4170 -3710 2.224.89 W ELECTRICITY 73-1300-3710 1,531.92 HAR ELECTRICITY 78- 7800-3110 4/18/90 4118/90 5,097.82 JOL-CO 1010 WHEIII1 $TAM DOER CO YTJ 0 TOTM 5097.82 PM 2,131.74 PLIN BLADES 01-4280-2310 4/18/90 4/18/90 2,131.74 J K -r^ 1010 PATER CAIJEMM8D1 I CO YOM TOTAL 2131.74 1001 205.45 WN HOSP-M. TlWXSON 01-4140-1510 4/18/90 4/18/90 105.45 JRML-CD 1010 PHYSICIANS OF M YETDOR TOTAL 205.45 114200 376.98 '89 LIQUOR AUDIT 71- 7100 -3610 4/18/90 4118/ 376.96 JAIL -CD 1010 R L YOUNODK i AMOCIATES VE1M TOTAL 376.98 14270 31.50 HCK EV-MSTROTI 01 -4140 -4110 4/18/90 4/18/40 31.50 J K-CD 1010 ATMKS SO61R01M VENDOR TOTAL 31.50 54390 7,305.42 WAY RENT 71 -7100 -3920 4/18/90 4/18/90 2,305.42 JRK -CD 1010 SHDIELIIE PLAZA YEMDOR TOTAL 2305.42 54440 14.00 WAR CAR MKS 01-4280 -3810 94.50 MAR CAR MSHF5 01- 4140-3810 4/18/90 4/18/90 108.50 JRML -CD 1010 SPRING PAW CAR MASH VENDtSR TOTAL 106.50 S05I 40.00 OIL XX DEPMIT 22-4170 -2:00 4/18/ 4118/90 40 10 ift-CD 1010 ST BOTH OIL VENDOR TOTAL 40.00 51600 123. FLA9ER 01 -4140 -1310 • /z -ay MM 1 4118/90 4/18/ PURCHASE JOURNAL AP 002-01 0330 ENT CITY OF AM VENDOR INVOICE ME HOLD M5490 597.00 NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMMDIIfT DESCRIPTION W%29 4/18/ 4/18/ 123.90 JRML - CD STREICHER'S VENDOR TOTAL 123.90 80.40 54641 62.70 LH LOCK 4/18/90 4/18/ 62.70 JRNI -CD SLM4 EN CORP VENDOR TOTAL 61.70 T4716 42.50 TEMP HELP 4118/ 4118/9C 42.50 JRK - CD TEIPORARIES TO 00 VENDOR TOTAL 42.50 T4730 78.60 MAR LEGAL 15.60 WMt LEGAL 202.80 MAR LEGAL-SALE AM LIC 66.49 MR LEGAL-C WILL REMMOD 27.30 MAR LEGAL- SEALCOAT 18.20 MAR LEGAL- OUTDOOR STORAGE 4/18/90 4/18/°0 408.99 JRNL -CD THE LAKER VENDOR TOTAL 408.99 T4940 448.31 PIIP WIPLIES 4/18/90 4/19/90 448.31 JRML -CD TRI-STATE PUW fi CONTROL I VENDOR TOTAL 448.31 V5181 24.20 HI A.0 BEAR 4/18/90 4/18/90 24.20 JRtL-CD VAN 0 LITE, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 24.20 199.78 4118/90 4/18/ VILLAGE CHEVROLET VENDOR TOTAL 0330 ENT 275.00 4/18/90 4/18/90 ILACOIIA RIDGEVTEN HOSPITAL VENDOR TOTAL M5490 597.00 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 4/18/90 4/18190 HESCO VENDOR TOTAL W%29 243 12 NCAN RENT,NX-MAR 4/13/90 4/18/90 IESTOWA COMMUNITY ACTN No VENDOR TOTAL M5625 80.40 199.78 JRNL-CD 199.78 275.00 ENT 275.00 JRNL-CD 275.00 597.00 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 597. JRNL -CD 597.00 243 12 NCAN RENT,NX-MAR 243.22 JRML -CD 243.22 80.40 RFP61R cTRnwr OATS Vtf/" TIME 15.54.111 PRE -MID ow ACCOUNT N1M11ER AMM UNT CHECK I DATE 1010 22 -4110 -1100 1010 01- 4270-1300 1010 01- 4020-3510 01-4190 -3510 01- 4140 -3510 30-6000-3510 27 -5100 -3510 60- 6000 -3510 1010 78- 7800-3800 1010 01- 4290 -2200 1010 01-4140 -3810 22- 4170 -2200 1010 01-4140 -4110 1010 78-7800-2300 1010 16-5886-4100 1010 01-4280-3810 is • 1 � u 1 225 PAGE 8 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4/18/10 AP- CO2-01 CITY OF MOUND TIME 15.54.53 VElM INVOICE ME HOLD PIE -PAID CHECIc NO- INVOICE NO DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCO w NUIBER AMOUNT CHECK 0 DATE 4118/90 4/18!90 80.40 JRNL-CO 1010 WED ENGINEERING M. VENDOR TOTAL 80.40 N563D 528.00 NORTHERN RD BREAK 73- 7300 -3800 4/18/90 4/18/90 528.00 JRNL —CD 1010 NIDIER INC VENDOR TOTAL 528.00 IFA90 9,219.22 1194.2 T BUCKSHOT 27 -5800 -1340 4/18/90 4/16/ 9,219.22 JRNL-CD 1010 MI MUELLER I SONS VENDOR TOTAL 9219,22 1!5700 425.00 1ST QTR LEGAL -C HALL VOID 30- 6000-3100 1,695.50 1ST QYR LEGAL- 01-4110 -3100 550.00 1ST QTR LEGAL- PMB(ING 60- 6000-3100 160.00 1ST QTR LEfn -10M ESCAI 01-2300-0974 15.00 1ST OR LEGAL -HIGH- ASSESS 26- 1190 -0000 4/18/90 4/18/90 2,905.50 AL-CD 1010 WORST- PEARMM- LARSOM VENDW TOTAL 2905.50 N575C 52.74 PRINC-1012 01-4320 -5000 4.03 INT -1012 01- 4320 -6110 402.88 PRINC -5052 01- 4320-5000 188.56 MAINT -5052 01- 4320 -3800 4/18/90 4118/90 648.21 AL-CD 1010 1001 CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL 648.21 T6115 21.00 ACE SUPPLY PART 22- 4170 -22 4/18/90 4/18/90 21.00 JRNL -CD 1010 BRAD LANDSMAN VENDOR TOTAL 21.00 26130 25.00 TON TRAINING CAR 22-4170-4100 4/18/90 4/18/90 25.00 JRNL -CD 1010 BOB BOSMA VENDOR TOTAL 25.00 TOTAL ALL VENDORS 94,241.37 o o y� 1] 12?.* e WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK MAY 7 -11 WHEREAS, we need to realize now, more than ever, what a resource our older American are, and that the abilities of older Americans to invest our country with their knowledge, creativity and experience cannot be denieds and WHEREAS, senior centers offer valuable service to the community in providing our senior citizens the benefits of good fellowship, encouragement and support, the opportunity to help themselves and each other, and offering. service of access to community services as needed; and WHEREAS, the month of May has been proclaimed Older Americans Month, and communities across the country are giving special recognition to the role of senior centers; THEREFORE, I hereby proclaim May 7 - 11 as "WESTONKA SENIOR CENTER WEEK" in our community to honor our senior citizens, and to commend those who staff our senior center and who have been so successful in their efforts to assist our senior citizens to continue their involve- ment with and contribution to the community. • 1 2Z#7 • CITY OF MOUND 1990 BUDGET REVENUE REPORT MARCH 1990 25.06 MARCH YTD PER CENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE RECEIVED -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- GENERAL FUND Taxes 1262190 0 2172 1260018 0.176 Intergovernmental 780860 652 17152 763708 2.206 Business Licenses 9950 325 893 9057 8.976 Non - business Licenses and Permits 86700 3907 9281 77419 10.708 Charges for Services 34800 861 2376 32424 6.836 Court Fines 95000 5343 10996 84004 11.576 Charges to Other Departments 20000 1666 5214 14786 26.076 Other Revenue 49300 74 6309 42991 12.806 *OTAL REVENUE 2338800 12828 54393 2284407 2.336 LIQUOR FUND 900000 72406 190662 709338 21.186 WATER FUND 360000 24977 72043 287957 20.016 SEVER FUND 590000 49949 145621 444379 24.688 DOCKS FUND 62950 14651 54180 8770 86.07% CEMETERY FUND 2000 800 2800 -800 140.006 1 IT rr CITY OF MOUND 1990 BUDGET REPORT EXPENDITURES MARCH 1990 25.0% Area Fire Service Fund 214290 MARCH YTD 163651 PER CENT Liquor Fund BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED GENERAL FOND - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- Council 63890 8534 22008 41882 34.450 Cable TV 10150 44 8738 1412 86.098 City Manager /Clerk 166310 21893 47629 118681 28.646 Elections 11400 12 1494 9906 13.11% Assessing 43320 281 308 43012 0.71% Finance 162030 10584 34855 127175 21.518 Computer 22150 1657 8096 14054 36.558 Legal 80900 4271 13146 67754 16.258 Police 717850 47052 198393 519457 27.64% Civil Defense 2750 37 317 2433 11.538 Planning /Inspections 145000 19098 34679 110321 23.928 Recycling 60670 8832 18435 42235 30.39% Streets 382890 23034 89583 293307 23.408 Shop i Stores 61440 4195 17936 43504 29.198 City Property 84200 3078 9210 74990 10.948 Parks 148560 5660 16867 131693 11.358 Summer Recreation 11310 0 0 11310 0.008 Contirgencies 30000 1575 1906 28094 6.358 Transfers 122270 - - - - -- 10048 - - - - -- 30144 - - - - -- 92126 - - - - -- 24.658 - - - - -- GENERAL FOND TOTAL 2327030 169885 553744 1773346 23.80% Area Fire Service Fund 214290 22020 5063) 163651 23.638 Liquor Fund 163450 10325 42010 121440 25.708 Water Fund 347930 43481 96214 251716 27.658 Sewer Fund 771560 58094 151428 620132 19.638 Cemetery Fund 3680 2 806 2874 21.908 Docks Fund 62950 6223 51041 11909 81.088 • • /Z21 MINUTES Of A MEETING Of TM M0001 #" ism MANNING oottll l SS iON April 9. 1990 Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners Geoff Michael, Frank Weiland, Jerry Clapsaddle, Michaei Mueller, Biil Voss, Sill Thal, and Ken Smith, Council Representative Liz Jen- sen, City Manager Ed Shukle• City Planner Mark Koegler, Building Official Jan Bertrand, and Secretary Peggy James. The following citizens were also present: Mark Goldberg, Craig Mletanen, Lorl Segner, Bruce Dodds, Larry i Christine Mauskins, John Qum, Nancy Sodermsn, and Jerry Christenson. MUCH owle by Clapsaiddie, seca ded by smith to approve the Flaming Camel ss lon M l notes of March 26, 1990 as submitted. Nation carried unanimously. G* The Suidling Official explained that the applicant, Mr. Goldberg has requested that the following condition, as stated in Resolu- tion #09- 419 .be deleted: "Relocate boathouse onto applicants property and grant a 9 foot side yard variance and 4 foot rear yard variance." The Building Official informed the commission that Mr. Goldberg has had a new survey drawn and it shows the boat house being 19.5' longs when the original application was snide, it was thought that the boat house was only 14.5' long. The additional 5' in length makes It Impossible to fit the boat house on the lot between the easement and the lot line as originally proposed. Mr. Goldberg Is requesting permission to leave the boat house where it Is. Bertrand confirmed that the boat house was constructed after Devon Commons was platted. Bertrand also suggested that this Item be referred to the Park Commission for their comments. The attorney's letter from Corrine heine was discussed. The Building Official commented that this letter is like compering apples to oranges since the attorney referred to an encroachment on private property, not pub lic °property. She stated that public property /parks and street right -of -ways cannot be obtained through adverse possession as private property can. The City Planner also commented on the Attorney's opinion letter and stated, "It does not speak to the merits of this case." MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Voss to recommend to the City Council that the boat house be removed from public property. Motion carried unanimously. This request will be heard by the City Council on April 24, 1990. 17-10 Planning April 9. Pape 2 b . Commission Minutes 1990 Building Official, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicants request for a side yard setback variance of 1.87 feet on the existing structure to allow construct 1 on of a conforming two story addi- tion with a tuckunder garage. The existing structure has SO4 square feet, of floor area which does not meet the minimum area rewired for a single family dwelling. Staff recommended ap- proval of the two story tuckunder garage and living space addi- tion of 24' x 28 and to recognize the existing side yard set- back of 4.13 feet to the west lot line for the existing struc- ture. This approval was recomsended due to topography, and to allow a conforming minimum floor area for the structure. Welland confirmed that the addition would not Intensify the ex- isting nonconforming setback. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Wet land to approve staff I000 mdrtlon for approval. Motion carried un- animously. This case will be heard by the City Council on April 24, 1990. c. The Building Official reviewed the applicants request to add a one story 24 x 28.3 foot garage within 1.8 feet to the east /side property line. The required side yard setback for this property is 10 feet, therefore an 8.2 foot variance is being requested. The drainage for this lot would flow between the new addition and the property line. therefore, allowing only 1.8 feet for drainage. Staff recommended dental of the 8.2 foot side yard setback as proposed. However, due to the topography of the lot and the con- figuration of the existing home, staff recommended granting a 6 foot side yard setback. the 4 foot variance would allow a 20 foot wide attached garage and provide 6 feet In which to get the drainage from the lot and driveway between the property line and the structure, as well as give the owner the 1.5 foot save over- hang as shown on his drawings. The applicant. Craig Mists full concrete driveway to h 5021 Crestview Road owns property, and was present t that if he would ever add west side, and therefore is • • non, commented that he could install a elp direct the drainage. John Quam of the house to the east of the subject o speak on the issue. Mr. Quam stated onto h 1 house, he would do so on the opposed to the proposed 1.8 foot set- 17 %1 Planning Commission Minutes April 9, 1990 Page 3 back, however, would be in favor of the 6 foot setback as recom- mended by the Building Offlclal. Michael questioned options for placement of the garage. The elevation of the lot and the floor plan of the existing dwelling were taken Into consideration. The applicant commented that an attached garage would make his house appear larger, and would be more aesthetically pleasing in the neighborhood. Koegler com- mented that practical difficulties, such as the design of the ex- isting house, could be taken under consideration. Mueller suggested a compromise by approving a 4 foot setback to allow a 22 foot wide garage. The length of the eaves were also discussed. Thal suggested that the save on the east side be cut off to aIIow less Infringement into the required setback. NOT 10N wade by The 1 seconded by Voss to approve staff repo - sndst ion for approval of a 4 foot variance from the east /side property line which would allow a 6 foot side yard setbacks upon the ccm Rion that the eaves be removed on the east side only. Clapsaddle commented that the eaves should match the rest of the house. C 1 apsadd 1 e moved to amend the motion to allow 18" eaves. Mueller seconded. Amendment carried 7 to 2 (those In favor were: Clapsaddle, Mueller, Weiland, Meyer, Smith, and Michael; those opposed were: Thal and Jensen). Clapsaddle moved to amend the motion to require the following condition: that the garage floor must be elevated to improve drainage. Mueller seconded. Amend- ment carried unanimously. The masAsd action carried 8 to 1 (flume in favor wares Clapsaddle, Mueller, Welland. Thal, Meyer. Smith, Jensen and Vbssi those apposed weres Michael). • Michael commented that there are other alternatives for placement of the garage available. This case will be heard by the City Council on April 24, 1990. d . City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the applicants request to have an accessory outdoor retail sales area at the rear of the Coast to Coast store. Koegler explained that this parcel Is split between two zoning districts, the building is in the 1 -1 /2.3Z Planning Commission Minutes April 9. 1990 Page 4 (industrial) zone, and the parking lot is in the 8-1 Business) zone. Koegler commented that the Planing Commlest may want to address the 8-1 /1 -1 zoning Issue at a subs* meeting, and if appropriate, Initiate proceedings to reeonp 1 -1 portion of the property to 6-1. Koegler Informed the Commission that since the hardware building Is presently zoned 1 -1, this request cannot be proC qu #s as an accessory outdoor retail sales area. However, cdn processed under Section 23.640.3 of the 1 -1 provisions which* tows the storage of various products by conditional use poUlt. r; The City Planner recommended approval of the conditional use mIt since the proposed outdoor sales area Is appropriate fOr location and will provide additional retail products for Olaf " residents, subject to the following: 1. The structure shall not be erected prior to April 1 of 0606 year and must be removed by September 30th of each year. 2. Hours of operation shall be limited to 700 a.m. to 9#00 p .m. 3. The structure she 1 1 be se i f support i ng and she 1 1 cow I y wob all applicable building codes. 4. All products offered for sale shalt be confined to tie structure and enclosed area. All signs" shall cmiply M't the Mound Sign Code. 5. The structure and outdoor sales ores shall be maintained In a neat and orderly manner at all times. Mueller questioned If corrugated fI berg Ias panels should be OM sldered an acceptable material for the Central Business District. it was determined that for this type of use, it is the Only feasible material to use. Some commissloners commented that they are confider the proposed area will be kept clean and will took nice. MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Thal to approve staff recommendation for approval of the oonditlonal use permit. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be heard at a public hearing by the City Councii on April 24, 1990. e. • F _ L • " 1 1. 1. . . ' • Ic Building Ot'ficial, Jan Bertrand, reviewed the applicants request for a 5.9 foot rear yard setback variance and a 1 foot side yard 1233 setback variance to allow construction of a second story addl- Planning Commission Minutes Apr 1 1 9. 1990 Page 5 tion. The second story addition being proposed will have a two foot overhang projecting towards the northwest property line. The Building Official Informed the commission that they need to determine If the overhang should be considered an "ornamental feature," and therefore not be considered an encroachment on the yard requirements. Staff recommended approval of the 5.9 foot rear yard setback variance and the I foot side yard setback variance to allow con- struction of a second story addition with a 2 foot overhang. The variance should be approved to allow the owner reasonable use of his land; upon the condition that the 9.1 foot rear yard setback not be reduced more than 2 feet for the cantilever of the second floor addition. The commission questioned, "What constitutes bulk ?" "Should the setback be measured from the overhang, or from the foundation wall ?" The Building Official commented that when determining setbacks for new construction, a surveyor will, measure from the foundation wall. Mueller commented that since the overhang runs the length of the house, the setback should be measured from the overhang. Meyer commented that since only the corner of the • house and overhang encroaches into the setback, the setback should be measured from the foundation. MOTION made by Smith, seconded by Meyer to approve staff r to approve a 5.9 foot rear yard variance and a 1 foot side yard variance. Motion carried S - 4 (those A n favor wares Clapsaddie, Meyer, Voss, Smith, and lichaels those opposed wares Mueller, Weiland, Thal, and Jensen). Michael moved to reconsider the motion. Motion carried 7 - 2 (Those in favor wares Clapsaddle, Mueller, Welland, Thal, Jensen, Voss, and Michaels those opposed weres Meyer and Smith). MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Mueller, to recamwend approval of a 7.9 foot rear yard variance and a 1 foot side yard variance to allow construction of a second story addition with a 2 foot overhang. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be heard by the City Council on April 24, 1990. f . 0 Building Official, Jan Bertrand, explained the applicants request for a 6.5 foot variance to Beachwood Road and a 4.4 foot variance to Westedge Blvd. The applicant is proposing to convert the /23' Planning Commission Minutes £ April 9, 1990 �^ Page 6 existing tuckunder garage into living space than add a one story• two stall garage to the existing. The Building Official explained to the commission that since the >" time of the application she has talked with the applicants about ; the possibility of eliminating the variance to Beachwood Road by moving the garage 6.5 feet to the south. The applicants agreed to construct a 22' x 22' garage instead of the originally proposed 24' x 20' and moving It south to meet the required set- back to Beachwood Road. The variance than being requested to the west, Mestedge Blvd-9 Is 6.4 feet. The Building Official also informed the commission that there Is a IS foot wide bou 1 evard between the curb on Mestedge Blvd. and the applicant's west property line, therefore, the garage would be approximately SB feet from the driving surface of Mestedge. Staff recommended approval of the 6.4 foot variance to the west, Mestedge Blvd., to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. The applicant, Jerry Christenson, informed the commission that he may build a 20' wide x 22' deep garage in order to bring the overhang away from the front steps to avoid run -off onto the steps. MOTION made by Weiland secnAsd by Ciapsaddla to ap- prove a 6.4 foot front yard setback variance to Westedge Blvd. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be hoard by the City Council on April 249 1990. r I ty Counc i t ReprUMte't I ve Reoart Jensen reviewed the City Council meeting of March 279 1990 and the agenda for the meeting of April 10, 1990. General Oiscu_ sslon Clopsaddle suggested that the City promote a neighborhood clean- up program. The City Manager reviewed the history of such programs that were implemented, and he explained why the City does not have funds for this type of program. Thal commented that he wants to make sure the subject of mail boxes is included In the maintenance code. MOTION made by Mueller seconded by Weiland to adjourn the meeting at 9s45 P.M. 0 Chair, 8111 Meyer /M Attest: LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT NEWS RELEASE .In APR 13 1990 Apri 11 1990 Contact: Gene Strommen 473 -7033 SUBJECT: Guidelines for Residential Dock Temporary Extensions During Low Water on Lake Minnetonka Re.idents on Lake Minnetonka experiencing the need to extend their dock due to the loo water may do so by following guidelines established by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District- WA Lalkm Minneton ks lake level is 925.73' as of April 4, compared to 93.44 as of April 7, INA, approximately .7' less for the start of 144. iuidelines, according to LMCD Chair Dave Cochran, Greenwood, include: a• The dock is extended only to the extent necessary to reach normal navigabls water depth of approximately three feet- b. No additional watercraft may be docked than permitted prior to the extension by the LMCD Code. C. If two or more neighbors combine docks, landowners we limited to four watercraft o%3r 16 long, with motors over 10 hp stored at the dock provided the watercraft are owned bv the owmrs of the combined dodos, two . sudi watercraft per owner . d• The extension shall be a temporary. .sasonal type duck. a. Adjacent dock use area shall not be encorached. Dock mist maintain a required setback of in feet for the first 50 feet, 15 feet for the next 50 feet, and 20 feet over 100 fact from the extended property line to the dock or watercraft- Written permission from the neighbor may allow shorter setback distances- f. Extensions in close areas such as channels or active boat traffic areas are subject to inspection by the Henrispin County Sheriff's Water Patrol to assure no hazard to navigation exists. g. Red reflective material must be applied to the end and all sides of a dock when extended beyond 100 feet in open water- Formal extension permits are not required. Cooperation with neighbors is essential. /01/ / Z SO LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT IM APR 13 iy90 LASS uss Comirru 0 A G E N D A 4:30 p.m., Monday, April 16, 1990 LMCD Office, Wayzata 1. Personal Watercraft Code Amendment - continued review, in- cluding discussion of the March Board meeting (excerpt of Board minutes is attached). 2. Renewal of wine and beer on-sale liquor licenses by Al & Alma's Supper Club 3. Charter boat renewal application for 1990 certificate by Lady of the Lake, Inc. (information only) 4. Deposit refund for completed event: Rollin B. Child, Inc. fishing outing 2 -2 -90, Excelsior 0 S. Water Patrol report 6. Additional business recommended by the committee 4 -12 -90 0 / n LMCD Board of bi rk?cti oD• , March 28. 1990 2) LAKE USE COMMITTEE, Chair Pillsbury represented by Vice Chair Foster. To accommodate the audience, the agenda was amended to consider th9 items relating to the Personal Watercraft Ordinance as the first item under the Lake Use Use Committee report. 1) Personal Watercraft Ordinance First Reading The Board received a draft of an Ordinance Relating to Boat Speed in Quiet Waters Areas and to the Operation and Rental of Personal Watercraft. Foster explained the concept of the 'ordinance stressing the sections covering operation within 300 feet of the shoreline, wake jumping, prolonged operation and the noise levels. Comments from the public: Michael Dapper. Water Scooter Magazine: Prolonged operation is a subjective matter; enforcement will be difficult; the language is not clear as to what comprises a confined area. Identification of a rider will be difficult as they move around an area of the Lake. Glen Neddermeyer, Long Lake: lie is concerned about the 300' requirement, stating it forces the inexperienced rider too far from shore; it is incumbent upon the rental agencies to inform their clients. of this law; Dower boats are equally noisy. Steve Wagner. MN Jet Ski Assn.: The ordinance goes beyond safety and containing a nuisance, it is controlling a business; the ordinance is directed at a small number of people, a group which needs educatiQa as to Safe operation, wake jumping is not a hazard to the power boats; enforcement of the age restriction on rental business is not clear as there is no prohibition on an adult renting the personal watercraft and allowing a, thirteen year old operate it. They should be allowed on the water same as a water skier or any other boater. John Noard, Anoka Sports: The new watercraft they are selling meet the noise level; enforcement of the noise level will take the older personal watercraft off of the Lake; to reduce the noise level by three decibels is asking a lot. Greg Gehrman, Plymouth: Objects to the wake jumping provision. Dave Brewster, MN. Jet Ski Assn.: Does not feel the 150 rule is clear as to how long you have to stay out of that area. Anita Twaroski, Department o` Natural Resources: Commented on the noise level section, observed that complainants have no way of measuring the noise level. Dill McG rann. Attorney representing the industry: Suggested as much un?.formity as possible; the industry is working with the DNR to adopt uniform regulations; has concerns about disseminating information; surgE..-sted a change in the definitions to conform t- a (,'east (luard definition; inentior►ed the. State of 0 Florida regulAt..iurns I"s1v'2 Pr offe'tive; develop standard method of measuring decibels. 11anuf acturers are sensitive to homeowners concr,'rn:s , tfiey reaclied agreement in 1989 on standards for decibel a.110walic(ss and restrictions. 8 1131 LMCD Board of Directors March 28, 1990 Sgt. Chandler, Sheriff's Water Patrol: Ubserves problems with prolonged operation - difficult to enforce - the Waiter Patrol would have to rely on signed sworn statements from complainants; deputies will take the "flack "; most PWC operators will not carry a watch to time themselves, therefore a Judge will favor the operator unless the time is about double the 30 minute violation. Comments from the Board: Boswinkel: The representatives of the public should write to the committee giving their opinions and suggestions. Cochran: Suggested a re- wording or definition of confined area. (Subd. 11) Reese: Hopes Subd. 11 on duration in an area has a deterrent effect. Raucop: Prolonged operation may affect others than residents of shoreline property. (Subd. 11) Cons'}}deration could be given of setting the decibel level at 75 at 10U'. Foster moved, Reese seconded, to approve the wording of the ordinance for the first reading subject to modification of Subd. 11. Motion carried unanimously. • • 120341 By Gene Vrotmnen, Executive Director i 3 Lake Mlnmetom►a Conaewallom Uieirlet OMM) In APR /240 IN@ BOATWG SEASON POSES CHAUFJ E& RESPOMBUZM *ice in the Tame @smack The anticipation of our on Lake Minetonka signals we ore of preparing for another boating season. For many it will bo the start of o tow expert' once. CKhen may be launching a new boat Old timers will be doing what they have always done —or will they? Preparing for few water besting ha be" a Lahti Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD) concern since INT. UabRuaateb. wrier levels have been on the decline since them, as we W know. With We situation, LMCD is prepared to implement further precautions to assist and caution beaten for dmir safe sad enjoyable we of the Mite. DUMB KqV5 AT CHAIOMJS NAMED Actieutakda" pastmenthby the Lake UseCansdleee,eha redbrBabPiWbury, Minnetonka. will handle placement of " darg er" buo at ib e a atrarnoo t o ebsaaele mated witb two swb buoys at iack end. Tbsy w®odR loo doee0 In s poddatt wboo do chamad buoys would normally be posidn" 71le will mark the are wbgm the dbamei le the pe~ depth. Howewr, bold era M poaeod of tln@ir ern risk A change b water ktureki could bwproe the cbsamd slwadon M de sprimdidtmm w seine ensua since the Lake tradkk m@W bees water in Ida July and AugwL own east level i mpsovemwAs could be lest long bebre the bee ft @*assns wksis dawn MA soplember. emte a Lakes Improvement aectim CONib ne Us dhannel droagln6 pogrom. Coffee and rarest Lake dh.rmela are presently in pe sMe . ramp rf.ko le scheduled as saes as possible after "ice out" Nortk Arta channel INS brow Noronbagcharund M to be cleared *(rocks under the britlge.Odmdenmale eaporh seeing shallow depths are on the county's dredging pnpom br hiWto savieot subject to budget allowances for each boating season. WOW AM HUD MAMM IIUOV DNIEC?1 M The Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol adwice.te boaters is to proceed w" caution in ell anew of the Lasko. Particular attention to marker buoys is a met. Dseela leadqusrlero identifying marker buoy significance are available at the Water Patrol in spring Park. They are included in summer rules placed by LMCD at ON pubNs aeceeel. New Hennepin County lake maps also Wm* major betudow areas. As the water may rdcede, bowmen. it is "beaus bowsre" as pmvidwly safe areas bsooaae too shallow for powerboat travel WAUMPAMMUMMUMIUMMOITEM An additional boater son** is being offend this @*sore, all I I ag to OIL BM Chandler. Hennepin County Shems Water Patrol Beaters mmkw tg Cknnnel is win be dhodled to Cbammel g for weekend and holiday beeft adaiee br Lake Minmelouka. Channel g broadcasts will be embeted rrift NIS Wm.. sattrrdaye at 11 aim and g p,m. Sundays and helidsys at 11 a.m. Reptile will Include nodes of buoys lemportiibr outof positiem, known waterhwrdt.ammele iowin wriordepth„ lehe level reading and weather breeaaL RRlONAL WATENCOW ONOMMM UMM CON1 The (hut reading of an ordinance to rugulee porsemd watem*& (PWQ nsedved Ike UdCD Board's Morntiou March U. 1610 ordinance fellers • said@ of with industry reprotattedves, public $.meta and rM Moss to asom WW ks reduce coaAie t on the Lake and noise problems bdmgexpseisnaod korn the she%A dadbd last in September of ION donbnred newer ono I I Meet the fit de sit d regdironenle. However, modified PWCs excsm si nmW wry naddeably. Noise enkmawnt is addressed in the proposed ordinance. A dielence 700 foot from sbsre has been designated quiet waters, maximum speed f mph, except between IN bet and 700 feet a person may run at speed if the PWC is trevneg at a direction perpendicular to or from the shore. Wake jumping within 100 feet of another watercraft would be prohibited. New requirements for PWC raaW we proposed Wearing of a personal flotation device is also required. Prolonged operation In a confined area for more than 30 consecutive minuiva would be prehiblted Manor focturers are being proposed to reduce the decibel limit to 70 by January 1, 1001. Persons interested in this ordinance may submit written comments to the LMCD, 402 E. Lake St. Waytots MN 05391. The proposed second and possibly final public reading of the ordinance would be 7:30 p.m., Wedne :day. April 25, at the Tonke Bay City Ilall, 4901 Mariam Rd. ICty, Rd. 1 1•hICIn regular board meeting day. /240 a f' MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOINND ADVISORY PAW COMMISSION APRIL 129 19W Present were: Chair Marilyn Byrnes, Cammissloners Tom Casey, Steve Burke, Neil Weber. Shirley Andersen, Cathy Bailey• Brian Asleson, and Carolyn Schmidts Park Director Jim Fackler= City Manager Ed Shuk1Q, City Planner Mark Koegier, and Secretary Psggy James. Absent and excused was: Council Representative Phyllis Jessen. There were no citizens in attendance. The minutes of the Park Commission meeting of February Be 1990 were presented for changes and /or additions. MOTION made by Caseye ssoonded by Weber to approve the Aerk Commission Minutes Of February S• IM ale Written. Nation am. led unanldbusly. City Manager. Ed Shukte, explained to the Commission that staff would prefer to mail the Park Coral ss 1 on packets on the No wlew preced 1 nag the Thursday meet 1 nag rather than the Thursday PhcW - Ing the Thursday meeting. Using thls schedule will help al- ievlate add-on items, and will give staff more time to Pw00r0 the packet as the Planning Commission packets have been gettleg mailed an the someday. The Commission agreed that having the packets mailed on Monday, or delivered on the Tuesday preceding the Thursday w ig is sufficient. Jim Glosoe first presented the Parks Program Agreement. He ex- plained that there are basically no changes In the agreement from last year, however Mould like the Co mission to suggest perks to be used as "Rover" parks. He explained that they wilt have a coordinator and an assistant available from 9e00 a.m. to 12100 noon, Monday through Thursday for the Rover parks. The following schedule was agreed upon: Pembroke Monday Avalon Tuesday Seton Wednesday Tyrone Thursday !I • 1 241 yyr � Park Commission Minutes April 12. 1990 Peps 2 Depending on the attendance. a scheduIa will as worked outs but for purposes of the flyer and art I c I as to be published in the lo- cal paper, this schedule wilt be presented as such. Byrnes questioned if signs could be posted in the parks to inform park users when a coordinator wilt be at their park. The Park Director agreed that this could be posted. Marilyn Byrnes and Cathy Bailey who have both worked as Min - neepolls Park Coordinators. wliI help train the Park Coordinators prior to the by i nni np of the season. probob l y the week of June 10th. Casey questioned if any of the staff has any science or -environmenta back4round. He suggested havi nature walks or some sort of envi ronmenta l education for the children. He added that someone on the Hennepin Parks staff could come out for a special events day to supervise a nature walk. Glasoe explained some of the subjects they have planned for spe- c to i event days i one of wh i ch i s a free program offered by the Red Cross teaching first aId geared towards children 3 to 6 years old. Glasoa then reviewed the Lifeguard Program and stated there were no Changes from the 1909 agreement. He explained that s wimm i ng lessons will be held at Mound Bay Park Beach, Centerview Beach. and Peabroke Beach. Casey questioned the difference between the salary for a Lifeguard and a N. S.I. Gies" commented that the description for a M.S.I. should be eliminated. Essentially, a person who is a M.S.I. 1s a Lifeguard and will not receive a higher salary be- cause they are a M.S.I. WTiON made by Casey* seconded by Schmidt to approve the Parks Program and Lifeguard Program Agreements with Cow- am i ty Services. with the stipulation that Community Services makes an effort to include trai or educa- tion for their coordi on the subject of anvi ron- •ental concerns. Motion carried unsnimous'y. • /Z yt Park Cass l ss l on Minutes April 12, 1990 Page 8 Byrnes commented that she would I I ke to see a more profess lonaily decorated IF l ost this year, and try to win a pr 1 se for the best M oat. it was confirmed that the Park Department will supply the tra iler and driver on Friday. June 15th. it was determ that d6wat will begin on Friday eveni June 1Sth. Byrnes wi have her husband draw a plan for the fleet s lnee he has Ox- per fence in the IF fold. Burke. Casey, and Byrnes offered to help with decorating. storage for the float was discussed. iwwaver, no conclusions were made. �Bllethlw ar 1�r�aad MM Pr■t�k steel City Manager. Ed Shuk1e. reviewed stave Jantzen's rsommeewat 4 1pp imarrovemtents needed on the Depot which would total W e T00. The C l ty rmwger rec0m61501 1e 1 , from a managsmsnt and practical stand point, that all the recommended l mprovewents to the do"t be done at one time Instead of In phases. He commented that all of the i mprovements w 1 1 1 have to be done at some point anlrw&lr. He explained that the deck Is a liability as It stands, and has been condemned by the Building Official= and currently the but id- I nv does not meet coLA. The Commission questioned if the historical value of the bui lding was strong enough to constitute spending the money on the repairs. It was determined that a new building. with less sgwre Foote", would cost much more. The City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his proposed improve - man ts to the Park which would cost approximately $124,000. The commissloners agreed that It was a good plan, however, the depot is the main concern at this point. Koegier commented that If the depot 19 Improved, parking availability should be addressed. The City Manager conflrmeli that If the Improvements to the depot were made, there are funds available in the Capital Improvement Fund to pay for It. The =3,000 allocated for park Improvements from the five year plan will not have to be spent on the depot. MOTION made by Veber, seconded by Bailey, to the City CounefI to wave ahead with the pr ovum its so citizens can enjoy the Mou years to came. In addition,, recommend t Planner proceed with the site plan for the carried unanimously. to re Fog mr■ and building fo- nd depot for hat the C l ty park. Motion w/3 x park Commission Minutes Apr il 129 It" Peso• 4 This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council at the ir mset lno on Aprl1 24. 1990. y R N • Bark liar 1 er. informed the Comm i es i on that the 000 - ' Of the Cori1arelm o 1 ve Plan wl l l be ldtn/ the Men - lon far publi hear ings. and ~1 a dirt len e w . ,the. -Peft C m I ss l on accepti thb draft Of the $Wt ion for public hear i no purpoo Ms . NOW or at" Ow Commission Of they had any comments roWd M W it rod; » and the now for . Ol cyc l •/tral i OVS600 the commun °, l ss ten discussed bike route opt ions. It was dins and Commerce could possibly have one s 1 114 r for warlkers and one for bikers. #010160" d ► tO' l l" 6" Ind the post officev behind ft. *'then owotinuin0 behind the IGA. It roe al de wolned the the: narrow streets In IMund. bike paths sae d i ff i ew It to MWIQN club by abor. long - 'd by "I"ong is am ova ilia &~ Eton faction of the r•lasneive Plan !tr 06110 ~109 purposes. • Casey suggested sons changes to the draft, as fsllowes 3rd paragraph. 4th sentence to reeds lgMel devel and future redevel -t occurs 00 City pay OM 1 re addition park land if . . . " And 4th pa'dWSPh • at the end of the first sentencee the following should be added " . . .. and to preserve the p 1 ant an i me 1 l i fe by such means as will lt ave them unimpalred to future generations." P Casey commented that he would like "Nature Conser- vation Areas" listed under Speclalized Areas, and define what It means. p&W So s last paragraph, last sentence should be added to read. "However. figures indicate a shortage of community parks and nature conservation areas." Casey referred to page 85. num- ber S. Ili 1 1 �t /zvy 7 .. ��P 5 'k rk Cowl ss I on nutes AOW 120 It" ftO6 S 'M., "ta l ned that now of www aplsl i old left ; we nor do th y Awfeet ci properlwo ?hero was f p6 rtrl n i no to the fact that two of the mp1 few is prior to otitis l n l na a I . *# It. COMW stated that he believes we shou 1 d send a ooMMWrt to the ON". MOTION erde by Casey to forward a cant to the OWN as foll ower "Because of the substanti env1ronww"I I pact of the sand blankets that the beech sand bla*et should be 11 a 1 ted to a 50' x 10' x 6" as set forth In the Mlnnesots• and that the sand blankets be subject to further DNR restrictions." Due to lack of second, the riot l on failed. 12N6 Mark Comm l ss i on !I l nutes April 17, 1990 Page 6 AsI*am commented that he does not feel qua IIfIed to make such a 'f.amment, especially since It does not directly affect park property. Casey commented that the City should be pro - active with envi ronmenta l Issues. Tht *Adept a Tree" program was rev 1owed which is tieing planned f4w $ tWi4eVq April 21st from 1000 a.m. - 3:00 p•m• at the VFW9 volunteers are needed. Casey will be at the table for one hour. k A94son offered to volunteer one hour at the table after the walk. TM dedication ceremony was reviewed for signage at the new no- ture area located on Drummond Lane, Block 119 Lots 13 i 149 ft"nv an Tuesday, April 24th at 6 #30 p.m. (pr to City Counci eloot it Iles suggested that any Park Commissioners who are able to attend should be there. The Earth Day Pledge Resolution submitted by Tom Casey was r" iewrd. Burke gwst 1 oned I f the paragraph relating to "VOTE" could be deletede he does not agree with that portion of the r000N s ince he may not vote for that candidate If they sup 100" same other I sow he 19 not 1n favor of. Wioi'lal Sea by Casey, seconded by As 1 •son to recommend *` eo tlW city Q mmf l that the Proposed Resolution be ap- proved. !boon carried 7 - 1 (those i n favor weres As- l oam. 1leber. Andersen. Byrnes. Casey. Ba il ey. and r Soft eidti time@ opposed worse Burke). Thi resolution will be forwarded to the City Council on April { f soottaido an city Kam Casey reviewed the Intent of this resolution. The City should on- force the statement at the bottom of the Dock Applications stating: "The use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides is not allowed on city property." Casey stated that he feels City eaployees should receive permission from the City Council prior to applying chemicals on City property. It was argued the Park Director should be allowed to make decisions of when and where to spray these chemicals without City Council permission. / er' �ro Park Commission Minutes April 12, 1990 1 6 Page 7 MOTION mode by Casey. seoo Kled by As 1 ason to recom moo the City Council approve the pro1ossd reeotutivn with number 2. amended to read as foi lass 2. Enact an ordlnwwe prohibiting any person. gon than C i tv eao i e+ _ from appl yl ng fort i 11 herbicides and pesticldes an public sherelands uiw der the control of the City. Motion caried unanimously. This recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council on Apr 11 24, 1990. Weber commented that he didn't have any probiems with the raeolu- tion, however, on page two of the resolution, he would like to see "wherever possible" added to the and of each paragraphs it therefore, changes the Intent to only encourage the use of native plants. Casey commented that there is iegitimete ardent that "wherever possible" at least allows people to make Individurl determinations. Casey Informed the Comission that he sent this proposed resolution to the D1R Natural Areas Program, and they sent It to Bonnie Parker who is with the Department of Transportat I on i both of these people thought the language was ad- visable and workable and can be used in most settings. Both of these people volunteered to come to a Park Commisslon meeting to explain why native plants are Important and why you do not need to have "wherever possible" in all areas of the resolution. The Commission agreed that it would be a good idea to have these people from the State come to a Park Commission meeting to en- lighten them on the Issue of native plants. .. .,. M R, — 7-P Ed ShukIe informed the Commission that the stop light at Commerce and Lynwood should be installed before City Days and he Informed them of the ground breaking ceremony scheduled for the new City Hall addition which will take place on Tuesday, April 17th at 800 a.m. lLW/ Park Commission Minutes April 12. 1990 Page 8 Jim Fackler Informed the Commission that the Park Department has been getting prepared for the summer season by petting garbage cans out• picnic tables out, and erecting new park signs. Fackler added that he could contact Cell Straus of the ONR to see If she could attend the May 7th Park Commission meeting and en- lighten the Commission on the Impacts of sand blankets, dredges. etc. The Commission agreed that they would like to have her at- tend a meeting. MOTION mob by Webei . seconded by Andersen to adjet" the meet l ng at I O s S2 p.m. ration carried lows l y. • • rz It' �» ., 11 �. v uu- o" mr MCI -:AM =xx . mWzm .'�. fir=-; LOIS ►"�'1 �Si�' � , � r ;1W �4M . LrA 'ice ` �► ,�, r 4 k LAKE MINWETONKA CONSERVA T PUN DISTRICT SOARD Of DIUCT025 A0910A In APR a 3W Regular Meeting, 7,30 p.m., Wednesday, Apri! 19 1990 Tonks Bay City Hall 4901 Manitou Road (CO - Ay Road 19) r: 3109 p.m. p"UC Ng=ns City of Deeph&ven Density and Now Dock License for increasing S slips in Say St. Louis 3 50 p.m. gpYlAR NM W=t LMCD Board of Directors 1. M11 to Order !. 0416411 S. Sl"dU* of Mimmteas 3 -29 -90 Regular Meeting 4. Wie 0em oats - from persons in attendance not oa agenda 3. lrgeeta A. Chair Cochran r 1) Status report on DH1 Shoreland Grant contract and preparations for cities to sign as partners 2) Management Plan public review procedure and public he&ziag arrangements 3) Additional priorities, announcements •. financial Reports, Treasurer Lewmin 1) Statement of Cash Transactions, month ending 3 -3i -90 2) !Audit of vouchers for payment C. Standing Committees 1) prLDM , Chair Resist a) Bid response and recomaaendation for awarding of contract, truck hauling of aquatic plants to disposal sites b) Project supervisor hiring agreement C) project equipment maintenance contract d) gquipmient purchase recommendations based upon competitive pricing reviews as finalised by 4 -25 -90 Board sleeting e) Authorization to designate Chair Rees; and the executive director to hire weed has equipment operators within budget provisions for the planned harvest per.od of 5- -29 -90 through 9 -7 -90 to include up to three days advance training prior to 5 -29 -90 f) fund progress, private solicitation for wted harvesting budget Si Additions!. priorities C. 2) VArzR STRUCTUR93, -Nair Grathwol a) Appro of minutes 4 -7-90, &sending heading and 17 page 2, Sine 2s 6elete refere;:ce to "new duck license and" tn. the new dock license for change of o- er.ship wes ipprovr.d by the Nord 3- 28 -90. (continued) LAKE MINNE rONKA CONSERVA I ION UIS I RIG I LHO Board Agenda, 4 -19 -90 2 b) City of Deepbaven now dock and special density license for 8 new BSU, to a new total of 218, subject to outcome of 4 -25 -90 wax public hearing and to requirement for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet c) Maxwell Bay /Lakeside Marina temporary low water variance recommending extension to 600' from 929.4' shorc.line using floating docks in exact same configuration as licensed permanent docks. d) Dock license renewals recommending approval for seven applications. e) Deicing deposit refunds recommending approval for 18 licensees. f) Environmental Assessmsnt Worksheet (EAW) for Excelsior Bay Yacht Club per attached outline, recommending distribution /publication as required by Environmental Quality Board. g) Temporary low water variance applications received since 4 -7 -90 meeting (per attachments) h) Interagency agreement proposal with MN DNR, MCWD, recommending dredging depth limitations. S. C. 3) LAKE U39, Chair Pillsbury a) Approval of minutes 4- 16 -90, committee action as followsc is b) Pnrsonal Watercraft (PWC) proposed Ordinance, recommending approval and waiving of further readings, with amendments as a result of public testimony at 3 -28 -90 Board meeting and further testimony at 4 -16 -90 Lake use Committee, per amended copy c) Renewal of Al & Alma's six charter boat wine and beer on-sate liquor licenses, recommending approval d) Special event deposit refund for Rollin B. Child, Inc. fishing outing for satisfactory conduct, recormending approval e) Commercial sales activity on the Lake, recommending Bert Foster be appointed to initiate a subcommitt -e study of the concerns f) Low water safety program to ident'fy Underwater Found Obstructions (UFO) through use of temporary low water danger buoys, recommending $3,500 expenditure from Save the Lake reserve to purchase buoys, chains and anchors, LMCD weed harvesting personnel to install. g) Water Patrol report 3. D. Executive Director's Report, Strommen 1) Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCMR) grant request revision and merging with MN DNR to !evelop an actiaa program for public accesm to Lake Minnetonka, revision adding an objective to (continued) LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVAI ION DISTRICT LHCD board Agenda, 4 -19 -90 3 "Survey shore areas for possible recreational opportunities involving fit ing, walkways, pedestrian lookouts and piers," per attached informatii copy. 2) LCHR Proposal Review and Allocation Meeting schedule, attached 3) Proposal for a fulltime ctaff addition for an Administrative Technician as budgeted, recommending approval to seek candidates for consideration at the 5 -23 -90 board meeting, per position description 4) Analysis of office space needs and options to accommodate weed harvesting program and Administrative Technician requirements 6. Ilsfimished Rusin'. ss A. As recommended by the Board 7. Nn ffasioess A. As recommended by the Boaru • • S. Ai joara■ sat 4 -19 -90 O I.AKF M 1 NNFTONKA C'(010 RVAT 1 ON D arritlCT • BOARD OF DIRLCTURu Regular meeting. 7:30 p.m., March L3, 1900 Tonka flay City Hall 1. Call. to Order. The meet. ins* was :;al led to order by Chair Cochran at 7::30 p.m. `L. Roll. Call. Members present: David Caul► ran. Chair. Greenwood; Jan Boswinkel. 'Neer Mirtnc•tonk.: l;-� Bart Faster, Vice Chair, Deephaven; dalne.; c;rs+tltwol. }:x� %13ior; Joh Lawman, Treasurers Mi.nnetri3ta' Tbr -mas Marticts•. I. Wa.°aata; R ,pbert kascot Shorewood; Thomas Reese. Hound; IZ•sGcrt Slocum, Woodland. Also present: Eugene Strommen. Exe�z-utive birector; Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Sgt. Wm. Chandler. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol. Members absent: Marvin u.iorlin, Tonka Bay; JoEllen Hurr, Orono; I)cuglas Bnbcock, arrirtp, Park; John Malinka, Victoria; Robert Pillsbury. Minnetonka. 3. Reading of Minutes. R. 3e movorl. Grathwol seconded, approval of the minuted of the Jartu.+ry 24, 1991) regular meeting as submitted. Motion carried urtartim�usly. 4. Cublic Comments. Thee: c..-twnents from persons in . attendance. 5. Reports A. Chair Cochran 1) DNII :Shoreland Urant Contract The I t.l,e. DNR Shoreland Grant contract and Manng, meal Ilan r-artial fund reimbursement, amended draft. Rngagina the 14 Lake: communities with LMCD for Shoreland P.Iles adopti� The amendments include specific language clarifications rec•_►mme.nciad by the LMCD attorney. Grathwr�l move til, tlart.in:3or, 3��c•�nd�.;r1. approval of the Shoreland Grant A,greeiry -. t between tale Department of Natural Resources and the LtICD, its amended, and authorized its submission to tiv! 14 LMCD citiF•s for their approval and signing as partners. Motion (-arri -.d unanimously. 2) LMCD Director Committee Appointments. Mart.irtnon m<•vr•1, N'0.0ter approval of the 1990 Board Committee assignments as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 3) lnter-governmontal. Agreement on Drodging. A policy ha:j h-?-en drafted r appropriate depths for dredging in e(i.n.i ti(- with thr. DIII2 and Minnehaha Creek • Watersh L)I.FArict I)Ircr -tor 5trommfsn and Chair Cochran w i l l with tlt� 1 ►141N an l t1f WD on 3/29 to review the draft in pr•iparation f. Water t;tructures Committee and board ssessment.. LWD Koard ..f Di rectvrz March 28._ 8. Financial Reports, Treasurer Lewaan 1) Lowman submitted Statements of actions for the months ending 1/31 /SCE and 2/28/90. were accepted and ordered filed. Lewman said th report will be available at the April Board meeting. Cash Trarit .; The reports , e 1989 audit 2) Audit of Vouchers for Payment Lewman submitted bills for approval in the amount of $19,545.25 covering cliecks numbered 5987 through 6020 and added to that checks numbered 6021, 6022 and 6023 totaling $669.37 for contract service, typing service and Eurasian Water Miltoil expenses. It is noted here that check numbered 6017 was liste4 !n error at $823.00. the correct amount being $359.00. Tho corrected total is $19,750.62. Check number 6005 to Prof. Fundraising Service for $373.77 was questioned by Reese. the Executive Director explained it is for a list of names for Save the Lake fund raising. The Executive Director reviewed the exchanges which took place with the vendor. Had it been known earlier, the Executive Direbte r would have preferred labels. Some Board members reviewed the list and seriously que!sLion its reliability. Pillsbury subsequently agreed to accept the list as being useful for Save the Lake Fund purposes. The cost was originally billed incorrectly at !$627.16, the correct charge being $373.77. Martinson suggested returning the list and ordering a list in label form. Stromrrien responded it is a n:•.. -returnable list. Reese moved, Grathwol seconded, approN it of payment of bills as detailed and - orrected, excluding check numbered 6005 in the amount of $373.77, for an adjusted total of $19.376.85. !lotion carried unaniiously. Lewman moved. Reese seconded. to return the list to Professional Fundraising Arid P ,rchase a list in data entry form. !lotion carried unanimously. C. Standing On -- 1 ttees 1) WATU STRUCTUNS A BNVIBOWMT COMITTit, Chair Orathwol a) Minutes of 2/10/90. Grathwol moved, Reese seconded, approval of the 2/1U/90 . minutes as submitted. Motion carried onianimousl y . b) Dock License Renewals. Grathwol inov•:d. Boswinkel se�:,-nded. to accept the committee recoaunendation for *ipppjvfd. - )f 57 reriewails, per the 2/5/90 Dock Committe . list 51.1bmittPd. motion . . =ed unanimously. r H?! t' :'rya a a cs) District Mooring Area (DMA) Renewals Grathwul mt-v`cl. MarLirts--ri shrouded, to approve DMA renewals for 1990 licerines as follows: City of Deephaven. City of Excelsior, Mel:liodist i,akesid-i.- Assarnbly and Minnetonka Yacht Club. Motion carried uninimout;ly. •} s ue, a.'F t - J s r *' s � ?' � �p s � ` Ltlt;U IIUa l'tj X7 L) 1 ! �. �� t.... i tlar.. F '# d) Delci.ng Renewals r r Grathwc l m,ve J • r ?.aa -c -p :.,r' oud , to atiprove the x deicing rec,FwAls. all latf fees h�,vinK beten mid :± Marina and Yr t;ll.cb acid Virgin.i.a MacDon MacDonald. cam -id unanimously. e) wgi.sl.ative Co mission on !Li Reaouroes ( '. Kati Grant Application. GrathwQl mc Ra3cop s•_•c :mde,., approval of the 60*1444 r of a Brant appli to the LCMit covering the following-', 3 * Developing at, Ac ti rrelara m for Public Access to Minnetonka. a Manaeina. hearsht:ire Us(- on Minnesota lakes * Develmvinx a Local Fisheries Mrona mment QdWebooR L(x2al Lake- Manna.-mrnt Aa- en -zies. Motion tymrr unati t.mV,.ts that The Beard had no nb,iec t3 oil to IA:MR s suggestiva subjects should tie c•misitl in cooperat With other 09000 f) City of wayZatu Bnvironment Asaessowit War. kafteeL (RAW) � Grathw-L- nr: F-: -ster s- „ ot,ded. t� approve the WAW for the w City of WF,yrat.a s•enrl i r .• <1 lor sulJmi ssi or, to the Bnvirota�teatet� , Quality Board as a .;c fi••:+ appr�wal o the City of Mafsote Special 11<n :ait..v - 11143 1'1•_w U -ck Li (-peke. Motion c unanimously r ` K) Minut�.a of 3/10/90. 4 ” , tics rt.ins•:rr, s , x , nds• d, approval of the minutes of :V1,01 IJ crmmmittee meeting as submitted Motion carriud unanlm : - -Iv. h) t ;arresutx,ndcsnres Regard.) fig tloulder Bridle temporary low Mater variance. Tito Ex- .-outivP r Boulder Bridge F ern has applied for a t#-!mp -try 1! wnt :r variance to extend eighteen slips on the mulct lake t•r .)m 100 f eet to 124 feet. Boulder Bridge has submitt a site pier, . At the 3ilui!)o c :�nun.itt. =�� m�•c•1 int,, a letter was rolceived from homeowners t tl,•- nortl, to n t ^vious permit granted in 1988 whi::l, Brio-4, ' -- t,,.• nr: eight slips from the lagoon to tlW- rnain lair•:. The eight slips are included in tho eighteen ir►v in the curr•_nt f,emporary duck extension r e q uest. 'rile LAri dge Farms and the City of to clisciisL tLr mutter with the Board. Mike 2ttt)•i Vridrt 11r.. 1•11arewoad, was present to repro t.lu; is sufficient set back ad.iac nt t,_ i 1i... r, f.lv. r1..v nF ichk, r:7 :uid the dock us #.rs are consid .t nt : �f t l, r �,�_,i ► _ i , ,F::. 1'1►�r•: was r,co representation from the 7 LNCID Poo rd f Virecturs March :9010 ..... ..... cm-hran gugg-anted co-Ainig the docks to the mouth. Jot tm , paid they could look at 1 but could not agree to do SO at tU' time. Foster suggested those docks be put an the list for 0.1! June lake tour. Foxter moved, Reese seconded, approval of a tomporary.. As extension permit to allow Boulder Bridge Farm to extend 18 to 124 feet into the lake, an increase of 24 feet. carried unanimous. 1) Bean a Greenwood Marina Ljoomm ApplIMML00o' Temporary Low Water Variance Arelloatiou The committee hold a public hear on Sl:i$l$Q ta$ � WA witiam�ve and new dock Liao*** for 90an Gro"06od, j*19gite 41 slip; from within the 100 sine t4 *,M' 100' As a result of committee committee review of the tt mod 00 W W V M a temporary low water vat an�r.. � � a %rod. "an has 419reed thw C-AwLttee vocomou"tION 'still Us carrent needs. He has made application for,* tO 01—OV174107, "'ift4ot vsvianc* extension. (Irathwol moved, Foster seconded, to %00 the, f a. Approve a dock license for Been' s, "Locating Slips 101 XOG and 107 according to the O"'rutlo' 04"0 of 1/9/0. b. Deny t1w variance request to C00040OW6, 'slip$ 400 j . 109 SO.' 79 and T-118 outside the 100 dilitilaco 4 c Approve a temporary low water vsr1&aaeL for 'all 9 ' 40 100, 99, 80. 79 &tid T-118 to 160' from the 920.4 sh*r*liU** 106 to a position Outside slip 30. with the furthor ativat", U that no watercraft storage will take place along the north " a 411041, of the temporary conf txuration between slip$ 40 NW- It's further that no water-iruf t st.orage take place outside Slips Ot and 23, as long as the low water <;onditions continue, as 4"1**Vd by the Board. Motion carried unanimously. A. Rzoetatur Uny Ifutding (kMPaar (XXOGLSLOV Bay Yacht Club) tail The hoard n-r-sived this .-ommittee review of the 2128/90 public h-.wring to cousider a crew dock and special density license for the Exco- Bay Yacht Club to allow eight additional slips for a total c►f 40 and a variance t allow fifteen slips beyond 100' and for n change from 32 transient slips to 30 rental and 10 tran sient. Of the 30 ►etitnl 10 would be for charter boats and the remainitla twenty for over -night storage. The charter boat rental service in propos•,-d as an amenity. An additional list of amertitles 1 bef-!rj sijbinitted as follows: 1. A slip de:3ignaLed for entergancy use by the Sheriff's Water Pstrol. 1,19'.lTitinued 4 7h �t .w ^Gus y l "Board of Directors 2. Make the pool available for public swim■aiaa A ored by city park or school programs from 9:30 a.a. sa. days a week. 3. Make a meeting room avallable to use by public groom no cbarge . 4. Dockage for charter boats. 5. Handicapped access to the docks. S. A lake -side deck pedestrian look -out for the publi* stood in front of the property as to public availability 1'n 6.0 io b p.m. daily. 1. Outdoor lower level deck licensed for food and bevera s Lao will be open to the general public all operating b OUtop o approval of the Excelsior City Council. ., A dock attendant on duty to monitor the proper det�lt ape �`✓ do tted has recommended approval of 1) the *c OXOUW } 1pb rarador + t!>nt hardship being the Ili liwiti>na the east end dock- use are*. 0) afadt *w d isk license as applied for, with the altos to 12' x 24 slips; 3) with tho x= S .to have a ainimwa iaot oa `tfiea r " P sk aid l,ii pro the r sp1 �aaoved• Foster seco e d+ t0 0 7 1 11 ti !or 00 new dock and sseci d+�>i�s tr li ackA Excelsior 8► IT t, a�utiura�iisis oa �, gip. x Dion the p so r � to rrivsto ea added that the ttansiea�at doetks 'sir 4 h " ` �' jam: bugin►sa chanied fr9a a public rile ,a +•. ,y: ttazxne space avallable to UUar r t* meeting man LMCD obaective of UWat + . i the public. fa " Ord discussed the aaNUmities. An insp+a►otlos i iiNril be wade handicapped accessible by op , a43U 0 000, is F jp` relapbnse to s question from Bloaqo to pbih" wlg ea�al five *lip* were used for dharter baata� 30.; 1 r . ♦fl' aagot of the Club, said they will make 0"97 4irt ` u i21 boat slips. Any empty spaces would be *"t � ¢4 10 charter Rascop asked for the actual n►!t < .; 4s y fir night storage. Bartz boat rentals as he can see no incentive for aocti +R: charter boats unless there is a firm number. Lowman moved. Grathwol seconded. to amend the motion for approval to state a minimum of four slips are to be retained for Reuse. Rascop, Boswiaaksl and charter boat use. Motion carried. Foster votinq-nay. The motion to approve, as amended. was carried with Raacop voting nay. F 4 ra rd of to r4o tors t. s k 1 ► 5 d� and g The Board rwceivs►d aA application f roe I*W"u y a j Marine for a new 460k license with minor ehanp%t i1 temporary low water variance apFl ic+Etioft : r M W a request abange permanent ittee d n+ acoeFtanos of the = ; '' �llot�ng thi o +v! owner*t�ip ar�►d �rwa " ,�+ral of the #catrir lc)w "*t �rarl w' .. ratbool ,' "des+ aagyant , tes . g l*.0604 with a +� 1: ►at Viet r ue# of the Aarina sF+�lw a#a1A0t' a yv ftisa+dler 60UW there are two 004t y "# Lon, to #00' smut encourage the atMa .' + lesion. foster - ou"ested rqtursiub. A he .`. ►s a tboroush study with the neldhboting, } ( dh6oss. drathwol expressed concern abooi #a►. obsn&sl. Dovid ' Carlson. representies the 6�t N he tbas sighted the distance between bob Che gee is and does not be l iev+I bests w001.d their docks to pass , thorough the obiow1. � operaWrs aayiesi and !North. Ubofs. Mate th prose" t, all owners within ,� on 4 f iv of the application. Lefever* stated that the neigrbrind to extend to 400'. They cou14 �M l move to share the avai l f rcpt ►,� , » prby owns 150' of shoreline bast of ''► . E Approval of this variance for Halmoll Bay Nsri +a as i� all the available sea-:* to one waritsa. Caen ra�ducIng the dock extension to 300'. 4 aP �1 ®rathwdil saved. foster seconded., to taw � for a tew rpor low water v ariance to ib! rt ooi mittee. !lotion carried unaniwously. 1) im dock license renewals t i k Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded. approval of eight 1*00 license renewals as recommended by the committee. inolad a orders, gti ulations and temporary extension, noting Q certificates have been received or time expired for respobaiea, follows: Excelsior Bay Associates, Inc.. Excelsior Bay Lakeshore Village, Black Lake Meadowbrook Boat Club. Inc.. Grays Bay and Libbs Lake Millustonka Boat Works (Wayzata), Wayzata Bay Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono). Brown Bay and Tanager Lake - continued 6 .�� # r � wt . . ff E Ff r " s -w ran SS .' I" r lot spring 1'aark ►i"os to 1!B 1o3. , Yro0 .,Y4a' to 290' t t 4<r u r d ea7�t* Apart M is from 100' to 152' to as narius. Cooks Bay, from the, original la!' 94 ` "in 10 to 360' x j t moved, Reese seconded, to approve the aa�tndgd _low jster variances as submitted. Motion carried, ,nay.; .;' V) Wars�sta � Yacht Club Ynvirommental /lssesse�eot N Worksheet ( SAM). r"S e k °fib the Executive Director reported the comment period has +�I!►xed on the discretionary BAN prepared for the Wayzata Pay " Yacht Club tampfvrary low water variance application to relocate thi ` District Mooring Area from 400' to 800'. Grothwol moved. Reese seconded, to approveCthe Findings of Fact and Conclusions that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. and Cite temp ( low water variance may be granted. Motion carried unanimously. roster moved, Grathwol seconded, approve a temporary low water mooring field extension to relocate from 400' to 800' from shore. Motion carried, Rascop voting nay. 7 Boa rd a l' Di i • r. r l., . r• ; y. Mar".h .:e, 1990 S) LAKK USE LXF♦lIITTKK. Chair Pillsbury represented by Vice Chair Foster. To accommodate thei audience, th•: agenda was emended to oonsidar thy i teals r• - )1 a(.i na tc► th-, Pers - -na l Watercraft Ordinance as the first item undt -r tlly Lake Use Uce Committee report. 1) Personal Watercraft Ordinance First Reading The Board received a draft of an Ordinance Relating to Boat Speed in Quiet Waters Areas and to the Operation and Rental of personal Watercraft. Foster explained the concept of the ordinance stressing the sections covering operation within 300 fee of the shoreline, wake Jumping, prolonged operation and the noise levels. Comments from the public: Michael Dapper Water Ocooter Magazine: Prolonged operation is a subJective matter; enforcement will be difficult; the language is not clr.ar as to what comprises a confined area. Identification of a rider will be difficult as they move around an area of the Lake. Glen Neddermeyer. Long Lake: Ike is concerned about the 300' requirement. stating it forces the inexperienced rider too far from shore;. it is incumbent upon rental agencies to inform their client:: of this law; p-jw -r boats are equally noisy. Stevu Wagner. M14 J.•t :AI Assn.: The ordinance goes beyond safety and containing a nuisance. it is controlling a business; the ordinance is directed at a small number of people, a group • which needs education as to safe operation; wake . iumping is not a hazard to the pc.wer boats; enforcement of the age restriction on rental business i, not .lear as there is no prohibition on an adult renting the per5ona water.nraft and allowing a, thirteen year old operate it. They should be allowed on the water same as a water skier or any other boater. John Noard, Anoka .;ports: The new watercraft they are selling meet the noise level; enforcement of the noise level will take the older personal watercraft off of the Lake; to reduce the noise level by three decibels is asking a lot. Greg Gehrman, Plymouth: ObJects to the wake Jumping provision. Dave Brewster, MN. Jet :Ski Assn.: Does not feel the 150'!300' rule is clear as to how long you have to stay out of that area. Anita Twarc. <.ki. of Nat.loral Ro-sourcPs: Commented on the nvisk: lf.vel St3eti011 .-bserved that complainants have no way of measuring the noise level. Bill McG rann. Attorney representing the industry: Suggested as much uniformity as possible; the industry is working with the DNR to ad -jpt unif--rm rePulations; has concerns about disseminating infvrmation; suggested a change in the definitions to conform to a Coast (luard definition; mentioned the State of Florida regulations 1"ve F)r(.)vrn effective; develop standard • method r measiu•ing �I�� ib ?ls. Manufacturers are sensitive to homeowners concern -, they reached agreement in !989 on standards for declbr•1 allowan- --end rer.Ari-_tions- 81 • LMC t Doa rd , , I' p i ro,A. , ni March 28. 1990 Sgt. :handler. Sheriff's Water F'atroi: Ubserves problems with prolonged operation - difficult to enforce - the Water Patrol would have to rely on signed sworn statements from complainant:e; deputies will take the "flack "; most PWC operators will not carry a watch to time themselves. therefore a Judge will favor the operator unless the time is about double the 30 minute violation. Comments from the board: Boswinkel: The representatives to the committee giving their opinions Cochran: Suggested a ro- wording area. (Subd. 11) of the public should write and suggestions. or definition of confined Reese: Hopes Subd. 11 on duration in an area deterrent effect. Rascop: Prolonged operati may affect others residents of shoreline property. (Subd. 11) Consderation be given of getting the decibel level at 75 at 100' Foster moved. Reese seconded, to approve the wording ordinance for the first r"ading subJect to modification of 11. Motion , ::arri«ed uceanimijusly. has a than could of the Subd. a) F -sl.er moved, Bo.sw.inkgl seconded. approval of the Lake Use minut#-.s Vf 2 /26/90 as submitted. Motion carried unanim,usly. b) Hennepin County 1990 Lake Improvement Profeeta Foster moved. Grathwol seconded, approval for channel dredging priorities per Lake Us committee minutes; approve Slow Buoy Placement adding a third buoy in Maxwell Bay; All channels under 3 -1/2 fret, t be- marked with two danger buoys at each end, rather than with channel markers, except Seton /Black Lake Channel which is to be marked with minimum depth warning signs. Cochran mov,:d, F'vster srco nded. to amend the motion by adding the m,jvr -meat of three buoys at the entrance to Carson's Bay further west. The motion for amendment carried unanimously. The motion as amended carried. Slocum and Rascop voting nay. • In response to a questi from Rascop as to the need for a psiblic hearincr -r , n busy placement. LeFevern responded that is a matter of* ura,_tj nut a le al n:att -r. Grathw noted the two slow buoys to designate a quiet waters area thr , .-c , mmittee suggested to be placed north of Big Island have be .-a dropped from consideration a:. the request of Hennepin Crmnf,y's Lakes improv..m#:_-nt section. Foster said it is important to get as much publicity as possible so they public is w,;•ll icy formed on what the danger buoys identify. 9 LMrAD 13•:•al 4 I 1 • t.., :., March 28. 1090 e) Charter Boat Liccnse. Paradise Prisoess FustFr n►•-v:!d. B. , swinkel s-irvotided, approval of a charter boat licenses ror t)avid I.awt tio-3, Paradise Princess charter boat. to be rt sub.iert t" oomi)lete documentation approv by staff. !lotion carried unanimous d) Witte and .Beer On-Sale New License, Paradise Princess Foster moved. Boswi nke t ge•cund>>d. approval of a wine and beer on sale lic;enLe for David Lawrarnce. Paradise Princess charter boat, tha Hennepin County Sheriff's investigation finding no cause fror re.iect.ion. and the erode requirement for a public having be ".n satisfi"d 3 /:a8 Motion carried unanimously. f) Ordinances Amendment Regarding Liquor License Bond Requirements LeFevere submitted an amendment to the LMCD ordinance eliminating thu: requirement for a sur bond, to conform to Minnesota Statutes. Grathwul m•.-vrd. D.swink -1 serrnded, to waive a second reading of the Ordirlan._-e Am- •ndinr Lak-_- Minnetonka Conservation District `03. 2 through 4. Relating to Liquor It•iqu9.rem"riLs and .-rderinp its publication. Motion carried linwxl:;ly. niis amendment will have the effect of eliminatitim V sur► -ty bond requirem for David Lawranee. e.) I uxicating Liquor On -Sale Queen of Excelsior. Grathwol as d that the minutes chew he has represented the Queen of Exce:lsi• N Foster nl" d. bo.swinkel seconded, approval of an Intoxicating t.iyu oi,-.iale, inc;ludinr; unday Un-Sale, license for John Lambin and sw t-(A partner Franco Loris, f.0 the Queen of � Excelsior charter boat, based upon Hennepin County Sberiff investiK_.atil.n ti ling no cause for rejection. Motion aorrLed unanimously. It) Cha e r Boat License • Queen of Bxeelsior Footer movcl Lewman se•_orided, renewal of the charter boat lice.n e for J_ it Lambirl and Franco Loris. Wu of Excelsior, berthed at Ex.cel:,i 1• ;it.y dv._ks. Motion carried unanimously. i) Spec A Event Pormi t Refund - Scott Dvorak y•:.i t•'t' fll'V eta t� l') lrl�!rl .�•'�'_11(IF•( . :,ppi of a refund o f • 1,itN f• �r�l ,i .� "j i L i _ r an iJer fishing -c•ntest Special EVOUt Permit whi w.93 ' .- �u.•�lt�d, total refund $151). Motion ea rri*d unanim� pus 1y . lu GMt;U 13u�ird of of the Lake Motion carries k) Directors aww"Fq Minutes Foster moved. Boswinkel sec Ube Committee minutes of 3/19/90 as A i unanimously. Personal. Watercraf L lienLal on U Magnuson The Board received a proposal from John �a personal watercraft from a pontoon boat on committee recommends acceptance of the concept p review and a charter boat license. ,r +i Sa .C,lc ►cum's opinion is that this proposal 1a i . with what is wanted in managing the Lake. I-t commercial venture. m `" Cochran stated approval of this would selling anything on the Lake. LeFevere recommf:nded adopting an ordi k � commercial ventures of this type and if the Hoard so Magnuson should be notified. He noted'..,, need a charter boat license as renters would bg. pontoon boat. The proposal does not meet the rogue €` Special Event Permit. Chandler advised that making app1icatirt, for a charter b-.,at license. boswinkel obJeicts to any solicitation of business'. . middle of the Lakes. A motion by Rascop. s4conded by Slocum. to ordinance that would make the use of Lake Minnetonka from any commsrcial use that is nut consistent with a withdrawn. A motion by Foster. s�seondod by Martinson. to dewy of the concept for rental of personal watercraft fran. � �r boat was withdrawn. Slocum moved. Martinson seconded, to direct tie 9 Committee to move expeditiously to find a war to solicitations and sale of any kind on the Lake. Notion Reese voting nay. Lerevere is to attend the Lake Use Committee when discussed. 1) Water Patrol Report Chandler reported two more vehicles: have gone thsouk ice. He noted 63% of winter acciieuts were alcohol related. Water Patrol will be using marine broadcast on channel 16 Wi switch channel 6 to alert, boaters of obstructions in the lake depth weather. etc.. They will broadcast on Saturday, :;unday and hol idays . The Water Patrol has anhld (. f „ in-ire tw ! ire Cull time deputies and has supper Hennepin only on the Ojunty &s a rd - Rasr.op mnv � %��= t.rai► sy�.ondV�e` ding them for the rad d a let . Sherif f Om-At and Sett . Brand-MberR communication plan. M,:,tiQn carried unanimously. 11 CITY COUNCIL PACKET - - 4/24/90 #3 k' N Ak &►wtd of U i rev tors March Z6o IW f 4' 4' �k k h. C. 3) YI NT CUMMITTU. Chair Reese a) ProJoct Manager Ete~+ss•� w:pved. Rmscop secorrdod, to employ Morn Paurus to servo uraesion Water Milfoil Weed Control Project Manager, parttiN March through December as provided in the Weed Control t, position description. and employment agreement, rks * i4io otive to 2/26/90, at $14.00 per hour. Motion carried dsll x° b) uraeimu Vot+sr VU110i1 Dud&t - * tom• R*tcop seconded. approval of the IM turasian .*Ifoil budget in the amount of $226,000 as submitted. :r hoot dons not include equipment purchases from the Milfoil ftad. potion carried unanimously . i pmapt Pwtvhsse - Conveyer Roset3nkarl moved, Kascop seconded, authorization to purchase r, 61 C-5afi Floating Conveyer, 25' length, from United Marine at.lonol at 611,020, approving 1/3 advance deposit of p34 with order. The equipment is required due to low at off -load sites. Motion carried unanimously. d) Additional Squi.pmeaL • Reese submitted a list of equipment needed for the $W. project ind requested a to proceed with obtaining competitive prir -111g. Reese moved, Baswinkel seconded, authorization to obtain Pricing information for final Board approval on the items listed 3/27/80, changing item 7 to read "Distance measurins unit and depth finder ", fun(ling to come from the Milfoil Reserve Funds.. Motion carried unanimously. . e) Spaces Ne adrs The Executive Director reported there is a need for space for the EWM project staff and equipment at an estimated cost of $175 per month, on a short term basis. Ras(:(jp m�iviv] . LFwman s :conded , t.. authorizes the Executive Director to lunal.e3 spat -e to meet the needs of the EWM project. Motion carried unanimously. 5. C. 4) ADV150RY COMMITTEE, chair Rascop a) Raseop reported the GU day period for comments on the Comprehens T] tin l'1 .ibl is Rrvi ,sw Draft will begin April 19. The Plan is bein►r di::.tributed to all concerned parties. It is important to presunt this t0 the Board member's respective City Councils. J., LMCI) 13,.,:ar-d +,1' 1►irccl.c +r:; ;: b) Rascnp m•-•ved, U3ratllw-A January consul tacit expenses of $3, 2::1.::i . llotio*' C) itaStioF` lll•,VC?f1, L , 'wlll , ll : ?e� to � expenses of $3.1129.83. Motion ,.,rrivd 1.Inatl.i.mcu:;ly, d) Rascnp expresseli his atli -stion participated in the Flan preparaU.fill. Boards gratitude to R_tscop and Re► sF ft•r their *1 plan prpparaLiort durittr the last. to y►_:. • 5. D. EXXCUT1VE UIitECTUR REivirr, Eug SU 1) Consul Lai&L Agreem<:nL w i th Frank The Ex+_cutive Director report Prank Mix4'41 consultant to the C+_•mprellensi •v,- Clan preparatt completed, although there may t-,e �: .�si at►er� I may be helpful of, . " ar, n•_ed -r--d" b:a:;ls C n tllr fui�ttl�� Rascnp movead, Grathwol to direct Director to terminate the LM(A) contract with consultant :.ervi.c orl the ComU-1•e ve. Flan. OX 31, 1990. MoL.ion carried unaniul ,1 , �• 1;0 +re axe The Cs: �ltive Dir _.tor w.Z -,isk i r: p for use of Mixa's services on an as balls. 2) Ttv-- Eye— i.lt.iv►: ltir•..•t.• r�- -portr -d Mut•i.et completed her probationary p• r ?ud is exceptionally. Rasr_c+) m�we 1.1, 1,�wman fi�'C•',11!.1VC1 -lppre:•v31 at hour rai:se f'or Flur i r 1 :�t•.w_trt , Ir�)n :�1,• • tisf'u114► • probationary s ?:•Pj /9L her 0 anniversary. M carried un - 4nirnotinl.v. S. Unf inishod Business Notie T. Now Business 1) Rascnp moved, MirLinEo. - In : cc s+►d�. Resolution to be forwaidpd to tllr; fourLeen cities asks, `;, use this low w,-tLe.r ot_•t ortl_lnity L,? clean up their ri and the shc,relille l,.v r'(.nioving d-hr•i.s- 11--t.iun ...al•ried u 2) Ra:;c(,p Moved. Martin r-ri s•_conded, that the L' position , - )n pimipirlr; vl.•rLer for lawn irrigation as an U " i use of Lak- water.. C and Fo -r;t% r indi • -t tee t ll�.y WOI,ll (l Opp declara ' Llle :jln.)lint• of w L, !r I iu u�:r:_l is infinii~�►s Lewnlan nl• veil , E' ~ LF: �.11•I ; I . i • tab l-'. till- suggest. tilt: 1 :11V1 I ( )1111111 (,�. ?�;, li �� I. 11 •' tl't'I ►111 , I1 la I I i ill .11 . 3 1 y . ;r< a a to 13 + �a a � + ••�� t�l. yK `�� .•� �]'/iJ 1'•I �.� I1 f' ' ►. •1'. t��l L'��7/ r.'J• 1��U � y •� I c Thu 1_hai 0, npr citl i. ill•wivi it, 11 :411 •� "11 ga?SWlll I;� : 1 . i �.••. f•r 1,-� f•): c= I►avi�1 C'•_�.au•.fn, 1.l1-.►ir • • 0 • • • WNrrPW + K LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO: "Huck" Cumttittee )FROM: Gene Strotitmen DATE: February 5, 1990 SUBJ: 1990 Dock Licenses k The following dock licensees are requesting renewals for 1990, including orders, stipulations and temporary extensions. Village certificates have been received, or time has expired for responses. Al 6 Alma's Supper Club, Inc., Cooks Bay Bayshore Manor Condominium Association, Excelsior Bay Baycliffe Property Owners Association, South Upper Lake Bayview Condominium, Spring Park Bay Berman, Lyle, Wayzata Bay Big Island Veterans Camp, Veterans Bay Cardinal Cove Beach Association,, Cooks Bay Cedarhurst Association, Robinsons Bay Chapmen Place Homeowners Association, Cooks Bay Minor Change: change in operator /manager Chimo Association, Carsons Bay Cochranes Boatyard, Inc., St. Albans and Excelsior Bays Crane Island Association, West Upper Lake Curly's Minnetonka Marina, Inc., Lower Lake South Deephaven, City of, St. Louis and Carsons Bays (application for expansion still under review) Driftwood Snores Association, llarrisons Bay Excelsior, City of, Excelsior Bay Foxhill Association, Smiths Bay Gideon's Point Homeowners Association, Gideons Bay Grandview Point Association, Carsons Bay Minor Change: from 6 BSU, 10 WSU to 5 BSU, 9 WSU Gray's Landing Co., Grays Bay Greenwood, City of, St. Albans Bay and Lower Lake South Hennepin County, Spring Park Bay Herzog Acres Association, Wayzata Bay Kreslins, Nary T., St. Albans Bay Lafayette Ridge Homeowners Association, Lafayette Bay Reinstate 8 BSU: from 8 BSU, 19'1 WSU to 16 BSU, 39'1 WSU for 1988, 1989, 1990, within required frontage 1,11)1)s 14riy Boat Club, Libbs I.nke Lord Fletcher Apartments, West Arm Lord Fletchers of the lake, Coffee Cove Methodist Lakeside Assembly, Wayzata Bay Minnetonka Beach, Cite of, East Crystal Bay, Lafayette Bay, and Lower lake North ,. (continued) LAKE MIMETONKA CONSERVATION DOT111CT Sack Committee k. February S, 1990 Walter's Port Improvement & Maintenance Association, Carman's Bay Wayzata, City of, Wayzata Bay (application for expandsion still under review) Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 1, Wayzata Bay Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 2, Wayzata Bay West Beach Apartments, Coffee Cove Willow Woods Corporation, Gideons Bay Woodend Shores Beach Association, West Upper Lake The following have chosen to waive renewal by submitting a $25 administrative registration: Mai Tai, Excelsior Bay for 1989 and 1990 Park Hill, Park Island, Park Island West Apartments, Black Lake for 1990 Seton Twillhomes, Seton Lake Plinor 01111 ;e: name, from Scton Place Development for 1990 ERS:jlm Minnetonka Boat Rentals i Edgewater Marina, Harrisoas day Minnetonka Edgewater Apartments, Spring Park Bay. Minnetonka Power Squadron, Big Island Passage Minnetonka Yacht Club /Lake Minnetonka Sailing School, Bay St. Louis, Carsons Bay, and Lower Lake North Mound, City of: Priests, Cooks, West Upper Lake, Phelps, Black hake. Emerald Lake, Seton Lake, Harrisons, Jennings, and West Arm days Navarre Cove Homeowners Association, Carmans Bay Neslund, Richard, Wayzata Bay North Shore Drive Marina, Maxwell Bay Ridgewood Cove Property Owners Association, Jennings day Rockvam Boat Yards, Inc., S +te 1, Coffee Cove Rockvam Boat Yards, Inc., Site 2, Coffee Cove Sandy Beach Place, West Arm Schmitt's Marina, Excelsior Bay Seahorse Condo Association, Jennings Bay Seton View, Seton Lake Seton Village Association, West Arm Tonka Bay, City of, Lower Lake South Upper Minnetonka Yacht Club /RDP Partners, Spring Park Bay Victoria Estates, North Arm Walden Tract X owners Association, Bay St. Louis Walter's Port Improvement & Maintenance Association, Carman's Bay Wayzata, City of, Wayzata Bay (application for expandsion still under review) Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 1, Wayzata Bay Wayzata Yacht Club, Site 2, Wayzata Bay West Beach Apartments, Coffee Cove Willow Woods Corporation, Gideons Bay Woodend Shores Beach Association, West Upper Lake The following have chosen to waive renewal by submitting a $25 administrative registration: Mai Tai, Excelsior Bay for 1989 and 1990 Park Hill, Park Island, Park Island West Apartments, Black Lake for 1990 Seton Twillhomes, Seton Lake Plinor 01111 ;e: name, from Scton Place Development for 1990 ERS:jlm � X Water BtrucLures k Knvlro&uwnL (kmwiLLee April 1, 1 VATSR STRUCTURES 0" fit 1. City of Deephaven Amended New Dock and Special DuwLIW bictine Applications. The City of Deephaven has submitted an amended new dock and special density license application reducing its January application to a net increase of eight slips from the currant l icense of 210 BSU. Gerald Laughlin. Chairman of the City of Deephaven Doak Committee and Howard Bennis, Councilmember, were present to represent the laity. Laughlin explained the amended application results from public meetings. There were objections frogs residents, primarily because of added boat activity in Carson Bay. Additional slips at Carson Day would not be Practictal because of setback restrictions. Limited road access and parking were deciding factors in Bay St. Louis. The revised plan calls for the add'tie -n of eight slips to the existing dock at Bay St. - Louis. There will be no change in the buoy fields. Responding to a question from Slocum. Laughlin stated he does not see any future proposal for additional expansion as a result of the concerns cited above. The amenity pr--oposed for a make - ready dock was clarified. It consists of a 2 0' make-ready dock. A previously approved 20' make -ready dock as an amenity by the Minnetonka Yacht Club/ Minnetonka Sailing 'School is a separate item. They way be installed se.Paratply or as one- 40' dock. The amenities submitted with the original application were discussed. They included both lake oriented as well as off -lake recreational. facilities. Reese and Babcock raised the question as to whether amenities must. bF- c ,aous to the proposed facility and whether they should be lake oriented amenities. Reese moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend approval of the new dock and special density license for eight new slips with the 20' make -ready dock as the amenity, subject to the outcome of the Public Hearing scheduled for 7 p.m., April 25, 1990. The LMCD staff will review the amenities related to the City of Deephaven Dock and District Mooring Area licenses. Motion carried unanimously. Boswinkel arrived during the following discussion. 2. Maxwell Bay /Lakeside Projx:rtics Marina - New Dock License and Tomtn)rary Low Water Varia+ ice. James Dunn, owner of Maxwt�ll Bav /Lakeside Properties Marina, presented his proposal for a ntvw _lock licenses and temporary low water variance:, replacina the current permanent docks with floating rocks, extending them to 600' from Lite 929.4' shoreline. is Floating Docks. Lunn plans to eliminate the present wooden docks, including the slits attar -hed to the shore, replacing them with floating docks. The d walkway will be about 625' long,taking into account the gas floo.k presently 25' beyond the 200' length. a: f. U "110!!'r0MA ta[*MVAT1(* DIGUIC'T ��► art J" ILy � M Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m.. Saturday, April T. 1990 LMCD Office. Wayzata !ma"ra Present: James Grathwol, Chair, Excelsior; Douglas Nick, Spring Park; Jan Boswinkel, Minnetonka Beach; John. Lowman, Minnetrista; Thomas Reese, Mound; Robert Pillsbury, Niairetonka; Thomas Martinson. Wayzata; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also Present: Eugene Strommen. Executive Director. SNYIYOIW�tiT 1. Progress on liquipmeut Purchase lxploratioms/Preparatioms for Bids and /or Quotations. Neese reported purchase of a four wheel drive 3/4 or 1 ton enclosed pick- truck or panel truck. suitable for carrying tools and supplies, is being investigated. Hennepin County will provide equipment to move the harvesters in and out of the water. The project manager is checking on the purchase of a pontoon boat and /or a Jon boat. Advertisements for trucking bids to haul weeds and for weed harvester personnel are now being placed. E. Personnel Preparations for Staffing the Weed Harvesting Supervisory and Operations tewwn- The project manager is Working on an agreement to engage the individual who handled maintenance last year to conduct major repairs on an as- needed basis at an hourly rate. Reese indicated contract maintenance is also being investigated. The Executive Director reported daily maintenance will be done by each shore conveyer operator at at higher hourly rate. Rob Merila has been offered the project supervisory position. Merila's experience with the 1909 program is an advantage. The project manager will provide Merila additional supervisory training. An employment agreement will be submitted to the Board. 3. Fund Progress,.Private Solicitation. Reese reported $16,000. has been received toward the goal of $55,000. The Executive Director is sending personalized letters to the larger contributors to complete the 1,000+ mailing. The Executive Director reported Water Specialists, Inc., Minnetrista, a water softener equipment company, has offered a 10% of sales contribution to LM(;D when customers identify Eurasian Water Mitfoil as a recipient. Lewman explained that the company offers this fund raising method to many community fund raising programs. Reese moved, Lewman seconded. to authorize the Executive Director to further inv._!stig ;t-: the offer of Water Specialists, Inc. and to make his recommendation to the Board, assuring there is no implied endorsement <,f the firm. Motion carried unanimously. 1 6::wm mov d . I * k... appro `091 1 • 1')•'1. fio.:-arts i it. -ludi Fka any no t:ed Val ;Jt status is P-tiLde-r n Dridt, ' e Farm, loi - De n is P►, •L.%. -a- -4 P 1 red Fnveqt AIL Marina. Lakewinds AusoclaUx--n. coertificat-. ru- lipp+-•r Fliviti•A-:•rika Yas 1 , CJ_tv rep) y J."llidiloot. tr b-vi i _-- I!v.z4 aid April. Notion c. - nv.rriu-d luvaiin••uslY. nit Exe.-ijuve Direcl.cv will itith LN-ninis B-_ ts to s• - e if is a in Ownership. S. Wtuing Joeoxi-ML Refuntin check PUlsboiry t.•. r.:•:•:•o4w_•nd -fund Cof the $101) dr: p. i L rip? I . 1pr t 1 s i is L i i: wi Litt 1- 1 1 i t i • t CIIr I.Y Ili 1 L1,•:. Y Mly ilo K+,wtrd E. F. V. V. Miritie-••itk• i:% 11ock License Mule -wals Wirth Shurw 6::wm mov d . I * k... appro `091 1 • 1')•'1. fio.:-arts i it. -ludi Fka any no t:ed Val ;Jt status is P-tiLde-r n Dridt, ' e Farm, loi - De n is P►, •L.%. -a- -4 P 1 red Fnveqt AIL Marina. Lakewinds AusoclaUx--n. coertificat-. ru- lipp+-•r Fliviti•A-:•rika Yas 1 , CJ_tv rep) y J."llidiloot. tr b-vi i _-- I!v.z4 aid April. Notion c. - nv.rriu-d luvaiin••uslY. nit Exe.-ijuve Direcl.cv will itith LN-ninis B-_ ts to s• - e if is a in Ownership. S. Wtuing Joeoxi-ML Refuntin check PUlsboiry t.•. r.:•:•:•o4w_•nd -fund Cof the $101) dr: p. i L rip? I . 1pr t 1 s i is L i i: wi Litt 1- 1 1 i t i • t CIIr I.Y Ili 1 L1,•:. Y Mly ilo K+,wtrd E. F. V. V. Miritie-••itk• i:% Wirth Shurw Thurid-,!rIA rd MA-1 i !' City -A ••A•:;-t Jain-,: I and to i iv I udt: Uk ]'•_• I •vi. t I x , t.1jr -app] ications were 1 .1 1 'fit i 1 - 1 - 1117, , 1 n . - ' a t . v Bay Marina & yatzhL ('1111. Ili- . Moti...111 .7ar-ri.-O 6. OLh(-r Hvitorl.!; A. Th.. 1. '' (.1 Hl" Ivalivironmentat Assunnm Wvo-knhir-cl, Ilay Yacht Club will be forward :l ;it •J* 110 also r the City (-,I, Inw water variafir?t! i.lpp L t r, x � 16j Stnla urea Rnvi ronmeat Committee ft"ell Bay Conditions: Dunn stated the water 400th at $o"t Bridge is V. Hennepin County will place danger b+u►o"' h channel ends. Hoerenbers Channel is about 5' deep with obstructir�ns which tl- nnepin County will remove. L•�r water` changed the water conditions in the area, in effect movi Ww out 300 from sho- ^e in Dunn' s view. y Travat Well Pit:'..- Dunn has applied for a permit to dredSo a 30' aide channel 600. to his deep Well. He offered to do this in conjunction with Gayle's !farina. Affect ON weirtihoors. Dunn doicribed the shoreline us age from Gayle's Marina through the North Shore Drive !Marina are*. The area between Lakeside Properties Marina and Gayle's Marina ins rasidontial property. He has talked to the firth Shore E►sIVIt Metine owners who offered no objection. He is aware of the objection by the residential owner immediately to the east. Acton owns two 50' Parcels of the 200' between his marine and Gayle's Marina. The LMCD has received a letter 4/S from Gayle Wittig, Gayle's Marina. objecting to the extension proposal. Ether. Pillsbury asked whether Dunn Will offer 24 -hour emergency service. Dunn responded he will discuss it with the Water Patrol for need before making a commitment. Reese moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend approval of a temporary low water variance to 600' from the 929.4'shoreline with use of floating docks in the exact same configuration as the Permanent docks. Reese expressed his opinion that all marinas should be encourager, as there is no lienef it to tile_ Lake in having the marinas closed up. Slocum would like tO Consider this unusual length in conjunction with a discussion with Gayle's Marina. Grathwol noted Gayle's Marina has been given notice of this application. Lewman suggested a statute may be necessary to put a maximum on dock extension lengths. The motion to recommend approval carried unanimously. It is noted Martinson left during the discussion. 9. Priorities Item Assessme Grathwol submitted an outline of items to be studied including: 1. Authorised UUA was discussed, with examples of resolving over -lap conflicts by use of bisecting ::angles and cords. Flip chart illunLrations were deni-..natrated. IL was further suggested that nhorr;lin•_ usilig .-trt.ifi by eakwaLers be eliminated. 2. ::hi reline rcuuiremeuts utsed te. determine density As prezently difficult to enf since watercraft ownership is hard to determine. That is expect to improve when the watercraft titling law K �.►;..; into �:ff��l. ] /1 /:al. The extent to which wetlands are iivilur.led mw.ist I r solved by getting an accurate inventory. Committf•e Chair (,ry thw reminded the executive director .,1' tt, n�-ed Lu sur.ve th zi.ti f�. this information. is 3. kenuirem-:nLs for spf•. -ial cl�r►siLy licenses relating to amernitiF•s was d- pendirig Hurr's return to activat". this study, lu aF `s`cx � *ter SLruetures • Saviroomeat Oamitts` B. The Executive Director reported a nine page report 4A a inUragencr agreement between the Hinaeb AM ftw* iht f#striet. NN Department of NaLurai Resources' amd Uft has issued. me basic plan is to arrive at depth limits On 0640 depths. The plan proposes: 924.6 for residential: 923. tot commercial and 921.6 for deep draft commercial docks and pnblit3 channels. With the licensing of contractors. the MM is MW reliant on the contractor performing Lo permit allowances. The Executive Director noted that Minnetonka Portable Dredging, coincident to this agreement, has a request pending to dredge their location to 920. C. Grathwol reported the Morris /Rowers dock use area conflict in Greenwood is being worked out with the neighbors. Grathwol reminded the committee that the wetlands issue remains to be studied. D. Grathwol exhibited a porous geomembrane underliner fabric for use under sand blankets. The DNR is approving its use and will establish standards for installation. T. Office Space Heeds R The Executive Director reported Lewman has learned of office space on Lake Street. Wayzata. above Minnetonka Travel Service. It has four private offices, a lartgR meeting room and reception area, and would be very competitively priced. The Executive Director suggested empivyment of milfoil staff and an administrative technician. Growing District demands being placed on the executive director's Position forces the need for more office space A s pecif ic staffing proposal is being prepared for the April Board me(Aing. Committee members were invited to inspect the proposed office space. 9. Adjournment The Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 10 :20 am. FOR THE COMMITTEE: Eugene Strommen Executive Director James N. Grathwol chair • • 5 • 0 LM "INNE"IM CONB1tBflAT1ON 018TRIC! tion beport: Lake Use Committee lls�r #iag: 4:30 p.m., Monday, April 16, 1990 LMCD Office, Wayzata lfoabers Preseat: Robert Pillsbury, Chair, Minnetonka; Douglas ftboock. Spring Park; Marvin Rj orlin. Tonke Bay; Bert foster, beephaven; Jews Qrathwol, Excelsior; Thomas Reese, !found. Also t: Sgt. Va. Chandler. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water ; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. 1. Personal Watercraft (PVC) Code Amendment - Continued bmiew The committee reviewed the 3/28/90 Board minutes as a reference to possible revisions to the ordinance draft. Steve Wagner, Minnetonka Jet Ski, presented suggested ahanges to the draft ordinance regulating personal watercraft. Wagner would eliminate Subd. 5 Operation Within 300 Feet of the Shoreline. Reasons: Restricting the use of the area 150' to 300' from the shoreline denies the use of a large water area to the pwc. It prohibits the pwc from cruising the shoreline for pleasure and also forces a rider out 300' who might be visiting a nearby point. Most noise comes from modifications of the pwc, and that is a manufacturer's problem. Wagner would eliminate Subd. 7. Make Jumping. Reason: If the intent is safety, in his judgment there are other unsafe practices such as sailboats racing close together. Wagner would eliminate Subd. 10 (a) Rental - restricting the age of persons who may rent a pwc. Reason: In his case he does not rent to anyone under 21 years of age. This is in conflict with Subd. S which details the age of operators. The same criteria could be applied to rental businesses. Wagner would change Subd. 11 to change Prolonged Operation to Responsible Operation. Reasons: There is a problem in enforcing the prolonged operation definition. He is agreeable to wording which would prohibit careless operation. He is concerned that laws should not be written which cannot be enforced. Wagner asked for a documentation of pwc complaints. Committee Discussion: Operation Within 300 feet of the Shoreline. Babcock suggested the pwc be permitted in the 150' - 300' zone if operated either perpendicular or parallel to the shore. Foster suggested language that would allow point- to-point straight line operation within the 150' - 300' zone. Wagner indicated such a change would be acceptable. Wake Jumping: Chandler offered a suggestion that would prohibit operating a pwc its such a manner that would cause another watercraft to take evasive action to avoid conflict. Rental - Age Restriction: Babcock noted the pwc ordinance is based on the snowmobile ordinance. Chandler said the snowmobile ordinance permits 13 year olds to operate a machine while supervised by an adult. Foster agreed with this section. 1 F ism Use Cwrit%" y Babcock asked for the addition of anchored to Subd. 4. Foster moved. Worlin seconded. to direat director and Foster to chance Subd. 5 to allow a point to point to operate between 160' and 300', S to allow a person under the age of 16 to oiler 6upervision of an adult or within signaling di' "moored boats" to Subd, 4, and to recommend the 44 Board. !lotion carried unanimously. Foster moved, Babcock seconded, to recorend' �., that following the reading with th e a as Hoard Naive the second and third i�eo• - rously. H. ftom al of Mine and Beer Go-Babe U"or L3 awNM Alm Supper Club. The executive Director reported there af+l responses to the renewal of the Al A Alsa'a Brtp boats from the South Lake Minnetonka Public Safi Orono Publ Safety and Hennepin County Sheriff ' a Reese moved, Foster seconded, to recommend a and beer on -sale liquor licenses for Al A Alma's vessels. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Charter Boat Renewal Applications The executive director reported receipt of�s renewal applications for 1990 certificates from L1t Inc. and Small World. The Lady of the Lake, Inc - insurance certificate and only one licensed pilot, license. Both licenses are also subject to inspection Minnesota and Hennepin County Water Patrol. 4. Deposit Refund - Rollin B. Child, Inc. -F Reese moved, arathwol seconded, to recommend $100.00 deposited for the 2/2/90 fishing outing pM Rollin B. Child, Inc. Motion carried unanimously.' S. Water Patrol Report Chandler reported the Water Patrol will add for the 4/21 Holiday- Johnson Crappie Tournament. to 6,000 individual registrations, (not boats), positions. A decibel instrument training course will...' Jointly with Anoka County and the MN DNR. There will be a deputy and special deputy tr report Writing and court handling of citations prosecuting attorney for the LMCD, from Holmes A Inspections of charter boats and rental completed by April 30. 2 y V y. i Lake Use Committee • • S. Commercial Sales found except for the low water. He proposes the LMCD launch a public information P asking the public to mark any obstructions thek find with temporary buoy ( plastic bottle) , advise_ the L!lCD. An +ll danger buoy could be placed there by LMCD personnel Morino: +da the weed harvesting program.. r Reese moved, foster seconded, to recommend the exPeaditwre of up to $3,500 from the Save The Lake reserve fund for ties acquisition of buoys, chains and anchors to implement the Of'O program. Motion carried unanimously. Chandler has a catalogue of buoys to assist in selecting . proper buoys. Reese furnished the executive director with a proposed news release to announce the program upon approval by the Board. The executive director furnished an outline, recommended by Attorney LeFevere, evaluating commercial sales on the Lake to assist the committee in determining what ragulatfons, coattOls or prohibitions should be considered. Pillsbury appointed Foster to initiate a sub - committee review of the subject. T. Personal Ski !Machine (Ski -Free) Roger Montgomery presented the committee with liter describing the Ski -Free, a personal water ski machine. lt jet drive 40 hp unit, 6 feet in length, operated by *bb from a 40' top line and remote control. Nontsomett ask" if MAAS water skiing device would be allowed on Lake HiftnetoWIM. ordinance requirement for an observer in a boot towi*S a t skier was raised as an issue. Chandler observed that the device qualifies as.e ea ore at 40 h. p. On taco value it would not appear to be p�rlNittllll +cHt Lake Minnetonka. Pillsbury referred Montgomery's inquiry= to Foster e Chandler, asking for a report in thirty days. Grathwol mentioned hovercraft as another form of xat +ll k the committee might want to look at. Reese said he believes the water ski observer rule Is strict during certain quiet times. Foster said use will 100luft that in his report. T. Safety Program - Underwater Foaed Obstruatiofts ( t Reese proposed a program, Underwater Found Obstraetie pry ` (UFO), which would mark obstructions that would not noitmal3* be 8. Adjournment. Babcock moved, B3orlin seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Meeting adjourned at 6 p.m. - Signatures Page 4 3 p? P *' a Y� ,�... �':, APPROVED: Building Off-10a) 168 R 9/85 C I T Y OF MOUNOCQb , ,!1) MW CANT . '*►V NO .. F a � . r r" t c i t y 0 ;. lk me" Add ress f ress BLOC ADD ITION S.. ■ Square Footage 3 t,■ A ZONING D i STR I CT, NBER OF SIGNS SQ. FOOTAGE OF SIQJIS UM M Silo, CMMterials. etc.) Y 1LLIk11MATED. Sit S t INS REQUESTED By TYPE OF SIGN: �...,.,_ e SQ. FT. WALL MOUNT . TIME►= ,SJASONAL SIGN TO BE ERECTED: FREE STANDING PORTABLE i OTHER • DESCRIBE REQUEST AND REASON FOR REQUEST: r .: . i s B c 1gn for d mamitY organization and does it meet all the standards of Sectlon 55.36 it additional Information is attached, please submit 8 }" X 11" maximum sized drawings. • pp I I cants signet e i — r Date ubm t� ted Recommendation: (�t l S L�u a,��. .--- APPROVED: Building Off-10a) 168 R 9/85 Hound City Code„ J k �(r R�. z. Subd. 10. TAcept as may be specifically authorised by tUltr 9 (f) . of this Section 365:13, portable signs are prohibited. used for the purpose of directing the public may be pesstltt" a.. follswing editionst (s) kid 040 IS coincidental to, or used in conjuAet sa wlt1►� Wait or gwsl- public function; and mod, ""'► (b) The period of use of said sign shall not exceed too (1W) days= and (a) Signs shall not be used more than four (6) time dswU% t. (d) Prior approval of a majority of the City Council shall be ! the use of any such sign; and Signs shall be placed on the premises of the advertised ennatiH,: (f) Such signs shall require the issuance of a permit but will be from all fees; and (g) In the instance of a multi -use facility, only one ssasoasl sips be placed on the premises at any one time. J k �(r R�. z.