Loading...
1990-05-08 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - -5/8/90 #1 CITY OF MOUND HOUND, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL L some OP NEW Ew no RiO M 11tNTin em CIL C IMMOM 7 :00 P.N. LOCAL BOARD OF REVIEW Hennepin County Assessor Keith Rennerteldt will be present. The Council will accept complaints on taxable market value from residents. The Assessor will then review these . properties and bring back recosmendations at the Nay 22, 1990, convened board of Review. The Council will take ac : titan of the total assessment at the Nay 22, 1990 Meeting. l Y 2 M D A 11 CITY COUNCIL =69"k OWING 0 ML COMUM 1 M DGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. APB MINUTES OF THE APRIL 24, 1990 REGULAR N13 AND THE MAY 1, 1990 COMMITTEE OF 141ii WHOLE SPECIAL MEETING Pg. 1252 -1264 3. CASK; 1D. #11 -OL& L REED HECKLER, 55XX THREE POINTS BLVD -, LOT 1, BLACK 1, ALEXANDER PALK, PID #13 -117- 24 22 0264. REQUMS MINOR SUBDIVISION. Pg. 1265 -3273 4. HEAR:W 9%9!! :fi TO CONSIDER USE � aMIG 7SE DOOR RETAIL 81 COMMER #90 -915. Pg. 1274 5. DIWUNSIONs USE OF FERTILIZERS, HERBICIDES AND PESTICIDES ON CITY PROPERTY. . Pg. 1275 -1276 6. CITY ENGINEER'S UPDATE ON WESTEDGE BLVD. IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 1986. Pg. 1277 -1297 7. COMMENTS i SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. 8. UPDATE ON STATUS OF SHORELINE DRIVE BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING REQUEST. Pg. 1298 9. REQUEST FROM RESIDENTS OF HALSTEAD LANE, RE: SURMOUNTABLE CURBS AND THE NEED FOR DRIVEWAY APRONS - TERRY WOOD, 2875 HALSTEAD LANE. PAGE 1250 • U t �i 10. DZSCONICMt CENTRAL BUSINEIIB PARKING LOTS. 11. APPROVAL OF 1990 DOCK REFUNDS. 12. PAYMENT OF BILLS. 13. A. Department Head Monthly Reports for April, 1990. a B. LMCD Repr esentative's Monthly Report for , April, 1990 Tuesday night handout ;A C. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District M from May 1, 1990, C.O.W. Muting., D. Planning Commission Minutes of 4/23/1#1. E. Economic Development Commission Minute$ at April 19, 1990.' F. Notice of Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AM) 1990 Annual Meeting. Wednesday, May 16, 1990 Mccuires Inn Arden Hills, MN. 5:30 P.M. If you are interested in attending, contaz. Fran before May 10, 1990. G. Letter from Tad Jude re: Budget Meetings Hennepin County Board. H. Councilmember Jessen received a phone call:` (5/2/90) from Hennepin County Commissioner, Tad Jude. Jude indicated that a study is currently underway by the City of Minns and six suburban communities looking at tbi ; vulnerability of their water supply in rel+ to diverting Mississippi River water to Lam.. Minnetonka, in terms of drinking water'. A hydrological model is being worked on 4V'' next 1 1/2 months by the City of Minneapolis' this regard. The DNR is pushing these cities do this study. The entire study is supposed' 5 4' 137* x 5 4 r � t406-3,402 t 3 -1404 k , take 1 1/2 years. I. Letter from the people who attended the Westoeh,a Town Meeting on the Environment as part of the Earth Week activities held April 22 -28, 1990. The letter is being sent to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, L.M.C.D., Senator Gen Olson, etc. Pg. 1405 PAGE 1251 • • Meting snrkry of Earth Week Town Meeting hold April 25, 1990. L.K.C.D. railings. PAGE 1251A r • • NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT HEARING CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MN. �.k MWICR I. ==BY GIVSK, That the Board of Review of the City of Mound in Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the office of the City Clerk, 5341 Maywood Road, in said city, at 7:00 P.N., on Tuesday, the Sth day of May, 1990, for the purpose of reviewing and correcting the assessment of said City for the year 1989. All persons considering themselves aggrieved by said assessment or who wish to complain that the property of another is assessed too low, are hereby notified to appear at said meeting and show cause for having such assessment corrected. No complaint that another person is assessed too low will be acted upon until the person so assessed, or his agent, shall have been notified of such complaint. Dated this 24th day of April, 1990. /� ".A.. Francene C. Clark, CMC City Clerk : in The Laker April 23, 1990 1 je7 y , M1 1 sy • f t. - as w t Y n �.... ...�._... l o l l ......r«.r�.:....- y...�� -.r. . � w 4 . A r } 17. rn •i 18. May 7,1990 Local Board of Review for 1990 Real Estate Valuation Notice Mound, Minnesota RE: Property located at 4451 Wilshire Blvd. Property Identification No. 19-117-23-310021 From: Turaquist Properties, Inc. (612)536 -5621 The writer has been out of the city and somehow did not receive the 1990 valuation notice. The County assessors office stated that the market value for 1990 was established at $255,000.00. Unfortunately, there was not time to set up an • appointment with an appraiser to re- evaluate this. We would like to appeal this evaluation. We purchased the property in August of 1989 from Americana Bank of Edina for $160,000.00. One of the reasons for this price is that the building located on the property has deteriorated considerably and is in need of repair. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Ralph C. Tura ist (612) 470 -9285 • • J \NN • 01 0 Oft A AM Us pioJr-?s -117VV yj VOWS 10 oogs ff �f / oot MAW AYA" 44n. at 0�� " D IF t ox fit xw,-e�vo .074 OF Iq Zee 440-C 7,77, Z. .Iltt -G/► 2 .C�-e -�- �IQlL.., ��I�,c�.. �cl�Zx. 1,�.' -� , 4�u , ��5 . i� • 52 April 24, 1990 HINUM - HOUND CITY COUNCIL - APRIL 24, 1990 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, set in regular session on Tuesday, April 24, 1990, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Attorney Curt Pearson, finance Director John Norman, Police Chief Len Harrell, Fire Chief Don Bryce, City Auditor Gary Groan and the following interested citizens: Craig Histanen, Lori Segner, Nancy Soderman, Dallas Jensen, John Wagman, Marilyn Byrnes, Tom Casey, Duane Leisinger, Ton Bostrom, David Nelson, Bruce Dodds, Larry Hauskins, Ted Parent, Georgiana Henning, Harley Smith, Linda Strong, Terry McAndrews, Barbara Mahoney, Kathleen McBride, Paul Browning, Bill Browning, David Clarks, Mark i Stacy Goldberg, Barb Roberts, and Jim Ventura. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. The Council acknowledged receipt of a Certificate of Recognition from Senior Community Services. The Certificate recognizes the City of Mound for their support of the agency's programs. 189 senior volunteers contributed 19,031 hours for Westonka senior programs in 1989. 1.0 !NOTION made by seconded / by to approve tee minutes of the April 10, 1990, Regular Meeting and the April 17, 1990, Committee of the Whole Meeting as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. a The Mayor read a proposed proclamation that May 7 -11, 1990, be Westonka Senior Center Week. Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following: RESOLUTION #90 -44 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY 7 -11, 1990, AS WESTONEA SENIOR CENTER WEEK IN THE CITY OF MOUND IASOZ " ".`. r m a • ati April 24, 1990 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.2 MoRhM N!ilIMB! ARLPMH= UTILITY RIM& City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was $3,559.13. Mayor Smith opened the Public Hearing regarding delinquent utility bills. DAVID CLRM, 3054 Brighton Blvd. asked that his delinquent bill of $221.23 be given an 30 day extension in order for the ownership of the house to be determined. MDTIOM me" by gees, seconded by Smith to allow a 30 day esteasioa (oatil May 22, 1990) on deliaqueat a000mt $33 5470 $23 is the amount of $221.23 for David Clarke, 3054 Brigbtoa Blvd. The vote was unanimously is favor. Notion earried. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing and turned the item back to the Council. Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: 1.3 RESOLUTION 90 -45 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT • UTILITY BILLS IN TEE AMOUNT OF $3,337.90 AND AUTHORIZING TEE STAFF TO BRUT -Ott N11TEa 8ERVICE To TEOBE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There was no response. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Johnson moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION /90 -46 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE E8TABLI8EMENT OF A SALE8 AND STORAGE AREA FOR LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES INCLUDING LUMBER AND ROOD PRODUCTS AND ROCK AND STONE PRODUCTS AT 22SO COMMERCE BLVD., PID #13- 117 -24 33 . a53 1y�acf: 0077, t i 2 CAM !90 -910 The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. • • The City Manager explained how the policy was the proposed policy to the public. The Mayor opened the public hearing. The following pp ssi� in favor of the "no smoking policy": Sandra sandei R Kathleen McBride (American Lung Assoc# Casey, John McKinley. The following V+W against the "no smoking policy ": Dave Nelson, Pat IN Parent (Smokers Rights Group). The Council discussed the following items: sha8 designated area to smoke in each building, ventilatk with the smoke, cessation programs for the employeeso NOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens to re ! to the Committee of the Whole meeting Nay 15th to'' following: finding an area in each building for smoking, costs for ventilating theme desi and costs for various cessation programs. This brought back to the City Council at its regular 22, 1990. The vote was 4 In favor with Jensen Notion carried.r'; 1.6 P2XS=NTATION O 1989 FINANCIAL AUDIT - MIT ata s rs r t > b read + Ted smoke, deal i tem ma the 1 be may If mmT• The 1989 Audit was presented by Gary Groen of Abdo, i Eick and Finance Director, John Norman. Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following rosol s RESOLUTION #90 -47 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND ANSWEIS =3 AUDIT AND FINANCIAL REPORT 1M:,, The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ,. The City Manager explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval. lacy 55 April 24, 1990 A Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolutions USOLOTIOD #90 -40 228OLUTXCW TO D:QOODI =D DM S=I81 MONCOMPORMIYO STtOCTURN TO MLSOW sTt110TOthL WDIPICITIOW Vft LONG 1 t of •LOCI 4, Dom PID i00- 117 -22 !s 60"* . • (4f39 MAD) , P a S O'er #90 -li The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.6 == A ad I Pat OEM va n iRiw WI—INNO 12 an The City Manager explained the request. The Planning Commission rscamsended approval. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolutions tN/oL1RitMt #90 -49 tpOLOTIOM To COrCOM WITM '!Mi OO ION To MLiA! A 9=2 =ate gas= VMM= Pot Uwe 9 i s, nam is, phD 10=9 PAD iii - 117 +24 1: 00" (9041 GRMWZ l WW), P i I CUM #to- too The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. �.•� �� In 0 i Q O B t • l v ' , The City Manager axplained that this item has been withdrawn because tha house burned again and the applicant is now going to jack up the home, put a basement under it and turn the home so that it does not need a variance. He will then have to bring the home up to the current building code. No action was taken. 1 w . "I') . ,Ir • 1 The City Manager explained that this has been before the Planning Commission and they have recommended that the boathouse be removed from Devon Commons. Mark Goldberg was present and explained that the boathouse was thought to be 14.5 feet long when in reality it is 19.5 feet long. There is a sewer easement on the Goldberg's property which will not allow them to move the boathouse back off of Devon Commons. He is requesting that the Council allow him to leave • ►aS 'IS j i • April 29, 1900 the boathouse where it is. - The City Attorney explained that the Cosmons were- surveyed in the 1!70:6 and that its when encroachments were found' on the Commms. 0w#4a 320, 0ubdivision 3 of the City Code states the following: "All structures, retaining walls, stonework, concrete, or other rva:enI on public lands are required to have a public land permit fi"A# and after !April 1, 197G." 0011 M 08ft W 00610ft, OSIRM to told* WAD SUM ""i two of *a "" P "" sia" b" us star silwrM id to WO it it was t # . fte a filar una*immely Is la"g. 4 1.11 'Awl► City Man"or a►lained the request. The Planning COMIssivn raedrAala apprroal. Jonew moved snd Johnson seconded the following resolution: >Mr/OfrYlI00� pl0 - SO 2i40109VIOLA to pylg#fWO >IdM bMyOIIMi i9 �" to ibt40 14 r now t * M • 117-84 84 O"S t t 1149 so "I r P `A .* can /90-912 as vote was unanimously in favor. 1.12 Nation carried. So City Manager explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval. Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: UMOLMIOM X90 -51 2WLOTIOM TO one= WITS T>jM PL1'DMM COMMMION TO AZJM A WHOM'! TM MilslM LI2M Pon LO? 1 MLOCM 2 " !l1'!D U I i 71=2 ADDITION, (2700 W39TSD01 tLPD.), PID 023- 117 -20 20 0029, P i f CAN #90- 913 Q 50 L dp 'il 24, 1990 !"M Crete was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Park Commissioner Tom Casey stated that the Hennepin Coun:.y Board N ted two resolutions today. One authorising a study on alilising Mississippi River water to maintain the normal lake level of Lake Minnetonka and one directing preparation of an t for lease of the County wells at Lake Minnetonka to the aha Crook Watershed District for $1.00 per year and Ming their response to this proposal within 2 weeks. "10 ®aunail decided to invite Hennepin County Commissioner Tad ftdtr and representatives from the Watershed District to attend the XW ist Caisittee of the Whole Meeting to discuss the above. The meeting will be held at the new Public Works Building at 7:00 P.K. 1.13 The City Manager explained that the contract will be for $16,105.20 for 1990. The Park Comisission recommended approval • with the stipulation that Community Service make an effort to include training or education for their coordinators on the subject of environmental concerns. The Council questioned several iteas in the contract. 1. Why there is a charge of $1,500 for Community Service Office Staff ;Jim Glasoe as well as Secretarial time) as well as an Administrative Fee of $2,100.68. 2. The mileage for a roving guard and supervision - 1,100 miles. The Council asked that mileage records and logs be kept for review after the 1990 season. MOTION made by Jessea, seconded by Jobasoa to approve the 1990 Park Program and the Soto Lifeguard Agreement with Cowenaity Services after the City Manager speaks with Jim Glasoe regarding the Couaoilts questions above. she vote was unanimously is favor. Motion carried. 1.4 The City Manager explained that the Depot at Mound Bay Park is in dire need of some repairs. Steve Jantzen of McCombs Frank Roos prioritized the possible improvements into 4 groups. Group 1 is Jas? >� w x L F. April the most critical because it deals with failure of elements which could cause injury (est. $16,000). includes items which address code issues that deal with the public (est. $19,500). Group 3 includes items which handicapped accessibility and city personnel safety i $7,500). Group 4 includes items which deal with 3 maintenance issues ($8,000). Enclosing the deck area roof on the west of the building would cost approu $30,000. If both levels on the west were encl approximate cost would be $40,000. This would bring the between $70,000 and $80,000. In addition the City Planner has reviewed potential to Mound Bay Park and prepared a cost estimate of a►Y+Mt $134,160.00. " The Council discussed funding for these improvements Con the Capital Improvement Fund. They also discussed the use of the Depot and providing additional parking versa space in the pxtrk. The Council decided to fait e j it improvements to the park and only do Gro 1 of the i mp Pa Y P mprels to the Depot at this time. NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by hhrems to prepaea and specifications and obtain bids for the or` 1 Improvements to the Na4nd Bay park Depot. The voto`t►as unanimously in favor. Notion carried. 1.15 :ARTS DAY 1990 GREIF ZU 1 The Parks i Open Spade Commission has recommended adoption of the Earth Day 1990 Green Pledge which would show the City "s sgWrt in saving the planet by letting our concern for the environment shape how we: Act, Purchase, Vote and Support. Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION $90 -S2 RESOLUTION ADOPTING TIM SAM DAT 1990 GREEN PLEDOS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 'L.16 PROPOSED RESOLUTION - USE OF 1ERTILIURS. EERSICIDSS AND PESTICIDES ON CITY PROPERTY The Park Commissi , )n has recommended that the Council enact an ordinance prohibiting any person, other than City employees, from applying fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides on public shorelands under the control of the City. )as8 t 59 April 24, 1990 WTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to amend section 437 of the hound City Code prohibiting dock license holders from applying fertilisers, herbicides, and pesticides on public shorelaads under the control of the City and preparing an ordinance prohibiting any person, other than city employees, from applying fertilisers, herbicides and pesticides on public shorelaads under the control of the City. Them was discussion about what kinds of chemicals are used by the City, where they are used and also what other cities are doing. Oeanoilsember James withdrew her second and Counciimember Jessen withdrew her motion. lemon made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to refer this itM to the Park Director for further at_dy and find out What fertilisers, herbicides and pesticides are used by the City and In what locations they are used. The Council Mould also like to know bow other cities are handling this item. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.17 11"WVAL Of f3RRDBM LZUR FOR HEANAN sCHROPP MOTION made by smith, seconded by Jensen to authorise the Mayor and City Manager to enter into a garden lease with =Osman schrapp for Lot 22, Block S. Dreamwood, PID #13 -117- 24 12 0026 for one year. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager reported that he has received a petition signed by 6 residents of Westedge Blvd. to have the street blacktopped only between County Road 15 and the railroad bridge. A report was done on this area in 1986. The City Attorney stated that the petition submitted is not a legal petition and a new petition with the proper information on it would need to be obtained. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Johnson to have the City iagineer update the report that was done in 1986 on this project and also give a report on Just blacktopping the road. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • 1259 60 0 April 24, 1990 1. 19 REQUEST FROM SKG�LXM DRXVa BEAUTIFY ITiON MUKT99UR - TTY Mr. Ventura stated that the Beautification Committee is asking the Cities of Mound, Orono and Spring Park to participate in a matching funds program to encourage plantings along Shoreline Drive. The City Attorney stated that if these plantings were to go on private property, the project would need to be assessed against the property under Chapter 429 of the State Statutes. Mr. Ventura stated that he thinks Spring Park will participate and that he didn't believe they were going to assess the project. The Council asked that Staff find out how Spring Park is planning to participate and bring it back to the Council. No action was taken. vzill. �. _ .r 7 E li The City Manager explained that this resolution will insure that these funds will not be used for operating expenses. Jensen moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #90 -53 RtSOLUTION TO BET ABIDE SURPLUS FUNDS NOW AND IN THE FUTURE, IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DEBT BERVICE FUND FOR CAPITAL IN )VENENTS AND MAJOR PROJECTS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.21 DIBCUB LMCD LASS MANAGEMENT PLAN. BEqTJ " This item will be discussed at the May 1, 1990, Committee of the Whole Meeting. No action was taken. 1.22 LICENSE RENEWALS The following are license renewals: Bowline - 8 lanes - Mound Lanes & Pizza • /*Uo 61 April 24, 1990 Games of Skill - 3 - Al i Alma "s 10 - Mack's Jock Club Juke Box - 1 - American Legion #398 1 - Mack's Jock Club 1 - VFW #5113 Pool Table - 4 - Mack's Jock Club 2 - VFW #5113 Restaurant - Al i Alma's American Legion #398 Domino's Pizza #1974 Happy Gardens Hardee's House of Noy Mack's Jock Club Mound Lanes h Pizza Scotty B's Subway Sandwiches VFW #5113 NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to authorise the issuance of the above licenses contingent upon all required forms, insurances, etc. being turned in and the debris and junk vehicles at the hound Lanes being removed. she vote was unanimously in favor. motion carried. 1.23 ?AYIINT OF BILLS NOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to authorise the payment of bills as presented on the pre -list in the amount of $140,300.36, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favcrc. motion carried. NOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to approve a temporary portable sign for Community Services to advertise adult basic education classes. The sign will be placed on the subway /video one property at 5309 Shoreline Drive from Nay i to June 15, 1990. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. 1.25 TREE IN MOUND BAY PARR NOTION by Smith, seconded by Johnson to thank Spring Hill Nursery for donating the silver staple tree that was planted at Kound Day Park on April 21, 1990, for Earth Week. The vote was unanimously in favor. motion carried. A. Financial Report for March 1990 as prepared by Cjohn Norman, Finance Director. • • • 1 g6 • B. Planning Commission Minutes of April 9, 1990. C. LMCD Mailings. 62 April 24, 1990 D. Park and Open Space Commission Minutes of April 12, 1990. E. IMMXNDBAt Dedication of new Nature Conservation Area on Drummond Rd., April 24th at 6:30 P.M. NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jessen to adjourn at 12215 A.N. The vote was unanimously is favor. Notion varried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager 0 Fran Clark, CKC, City Clerk C � /0? z MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - MAT 1 1990 The meeting was called to order at 7 PM, at the City of Mound Public Works Building at 5468 Lynwood Blvd. Members present: Mayor Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Phyllis Jessen, Liz Jensen, Skip Johnson. Absent: None. Also present: Hennepin County Commissioner Tad Jude, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District representative Woodrow Love, Lori Hamm from The Laker, Tom Casey, Park and Open Space Commission and Ed Shukl e, City Manager. Ed Shukle, City Manager, opened the meeting by giving background on why the meeting was being held with regard to the issue of pumping of well water into Lake Minnetonka to increase its level. Hennepin County Commissioner Tad Jude, presented the County's Position on the issue. He indicated that they have asked the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to lease the wells on Lake Minnetonka from the County Board, since they have the expertise in this area of determining whether or not this is a good idea. He indicated that the seven wells on the Lake were used for pumping water into it back in the 1930 He also indicated that discussions had been held at the County Board level regarding the diversion of river water both from the Mississippi and the Crow . River to Lake Minnetonka. He indicated that this matter is being studied presently through the City of Minneapolis and other suburban communities. Also being studied is the use of Lake Minnetonka water for lawn irrigation purposes. He discussed the issue of water from Lake Minnetonka being used for drinking water purposes in emergency situations, primarily for the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Woodrow Love indicated that the Watershed District had not made a decision on the issue of accepting the leases on the wells. He indicated that if nothing else, these wells need to be capped. Therefore, basically indicating that the Watershed District was not in favor pumping well water into the lake. He presented a great deal of statistical information on the history of lake levels in Lake Minnetc a and basically said that lake levels would be satisfied by pre .pitation amounts. He also indicated that the sanitary iwMn,Fsewt�► systems are not flowing into the lake. Following the discussion, the Council thanked Jude and Love for attending. Jude indicated that he would keep us posted on the studies that were being undertaken. (Mayor Smith left at 7:44 PM) The next issue discussed was the LMCD Long -Term Management Plan of Lake Minnetonka. The Council reviewed the Recreation Management Section and the User Experience and Satisfaction Sections of the Plan and made various comments. They will also discuss this at the Committee of the Whole meeting on May 15th Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting May 1, 1990 I A63 • Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting May 1, 1990 and regular meeting on May 22nd, formulating a formal list of questions to be addressed to the LMCO prior to the public hearing scheduled for June 6th at Minnetonka. the meeting was adjourned at approximately 10 PM. R �ectfully submitted, S fully City Manager ES:s • 2 lQq /�6 NININiES Of A MEETING Oi THE NO11N0 ADVISORY PLANNING OOiMIISSION April 23. 19W a. C=a No. 20 -9118 Rand Mockler. SM Three Points NIyA.= US R so .. W6 2 Am— - — — --- --- -- -- ---- __6 Commissioner Mueller removed himself from the Commission since he had a personal Interest In the case. City Planner. Mark Koegler. reviewed the applicants request to subdivide the subject property Into two parcels. The proposed Parcel A will have 6.081 square feet and Pareel 8 will have 6.391 square feet. both parcels have frontage on Three Points blvd., however due to topography. will use the existing driveway ewse- ment which Is on Outlet A for access. The proposed Parcel A has a driveway easement which crosses Parcel b at the south end of the lot. Koegler stated that the Development Plan for Parcel A dated 4 -3 -90 Is unacceptablet there Is not adequate maneuvering room between the garage and the east property line. Staff recoanended approval of the minor subdivision for Lot 1. Block 1. Alexander Park as proposed on the Lot Split Survey dated e -3 -90 subject to the following conditlonsc The building placement for the home and garage for Parcel A shall be modified as generally described herein to allow odeguate vehicular access to the garage area. 2. Compliance with the conditions outlined In the City En- glneers report, as followsc a. A manhole will need to be constructed over the end of the existing 6" sewer service. then separate 4" service can be Installed for each unit. b. The location of the water servlc,s appear to be accept- able. Curb stops will need to be installed at the east line of Parcel 8 for each service. C. The City should have a guarantee that utility services will be provided for both parcels before the lot split Is recorded at Hennepin County. This can be ac- complished in a number of ways such as actual Installation= escrow money, bond. etc. The applicant should submit either an estimated cost or a bona fide bid so the amount of surety Can be determined. The location of the easements were clarified. The commission discussed the lack of space for visitor parking. Options for placement of the house on Parcel A was discussed. It was deter- mined that a building permit for Parcel A will not be Issued un- til the site plan meets staff requirements. The commission discussed the pros and cons of building two detached single family homes rather than a two family hone or duplex. The applicant commented that the homes being built will be modest In value due to the surrounding properties (PDQ. fine property, and the pump house). Meyer commented that he Is opposed to creating new 6,000 square foot lots with so many easements and limited visitor parking. The applicant. Beckler. commented that this proposed subdivision complies with City ordinances. NOTION made be Thal. seconded by Clopsaddle, to approve the City Planner's rec3mnendstlon for approval with con- ditions. Notion carried 4 to I (those In favor werei • Clopsaddle. Thal. Jensen. and Michaels those opposed weres Meyer). This case will appear before the City Council on May 8. 1990. F1 .� t E rn #►�,,3 • Proposed Resolution Case No. 90 -911 RESOLUTION i90- RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, ALEXANDER PARK PIO #13- 117 -24 -22 -0266 WHEREAS, the minor subdivision of Lot 1, Black 1, Alexander Park, PIO i13- 111 -24 -22 -0266, has been submitted in the manner required for platting of land under the City of Mound Code of Ordinances, Section 330 and under Chapter 462 of the Minnesota State Statute and all proceedings have been duly conducted thereunder; and WHEREAS, an application to waive the subdivision requirements contained in Section 330 of the City Code has been filed with the City of Mound; and • WHEREAS, said request for waiver has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that there are special circumstances affecting said property such that the strict application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; and that the waiver is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right; and that granting the waiver would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Ninnesota: The request of the applicant for a waiver from the provisions of Section 330 of the City Code and the request to subdivide property of less than five acres, described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park A . It is hereby granted to permit the s ubd i v i s i n as per the following descriptions as shown on "Exhibit A" (survey) and as per the conditions identified in item B below: Parcel A: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park lying west of the east 50.00 feet of said Lot 1. is Parcel B: The east 50.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, exan er Park. r Proposed Resolution Case No. 90 -911 B. The following conditions shall apply to this subdivision: 1. The building placement for the home and garage on Parcel A shall be modified to permit adequate vehicular circulation. The modification shall be approved by the City Planner at the time of building permit issuance. 2. A manhole shall be constructed,over the end of the existing V sewer service, then separate 4" services shall be installed serving each lot. 3. Curb stops for the water service shall be installed at the east line of Parcel B for each service. 4. The applicant shall provide a guarantee covering utility services either through actual installation, escrow funds, a bond or other measure acceptable to the City Engineer. Said guarantee shall be provided to the City of Mound prior to the time that the lot split is recorded at Hennepin County. 5. The applicant shall provide a copy of the driveway easement that traverses Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park. This information shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to the filing of the minor subdivision at Hennepin County. C. It is determined that the foregoing subdivision will constitute a desirable and stable community development and it is in harmony with adjacent properties. D. The City Clerk is authorized to deliver certified copy of this resolution to the applicant for filing in the office of the Register of Deeds or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision regulations of the City. E. This lot subdivision is to be filed and recorded within 180 days of the adoption date of this resolution. 1� O • • 1 t i - t e L-1 I" ml" "E , - -• NORTH Il0.00 1 • r - - - - - - -- - - - ^ I Wit asou •x O 1 • ~ f � EIIMeI�I i... [fill f o `f f rf III i :I I I ig fill �I l �o f#fi -j f 1114 R � j sj�i � ``` � ji•-` � f j u io►� m x SEND • D PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission and Staff�,�/ FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner DATE: April 16, 1990 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision APPLICANT: Reed Beck1er CASE NUMBER: 90 -911 VHS FILE NUMBER: 90- 310 - All -ZO LOCATION: Three Points Boulevard EXISTING ZONING: R -3 (Recently Rezoned) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Residential BACKGROUND: Mr. Beckler is proposing a minor subdivision to divide Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park into two lots which will contain single- family detached structures. This property was recently rezoned from B -2 to R -3. At the time of the rezoning, the applicant stated that the intention was to construct a two - family attached structure on the site. An attached structure on this property actually fits the site better than the current detached proposal due the topography and easements which impact building placement. The R -3 provisions of the Mound Zoning Code do allow single - family detached structures subject to a minimum 6,000 square foot lot requirement. The proposed lots have areas of 6,081 and 6,396 square feet. Under the current proposal, Parcels A and B have frontage along Three Points Boulevard. Due to existing tcpography, a stone retaining wall approximately 5 feet tall extends across the frontage of Parcel A terminating approximately 10 feet into Parcel B. Parcel B contains an existing driveway easement along the east side which provides access to the Harrison Shores townhomes south of the site. The existing paved driveway extends westerly • approximately 21 feet across Parcel B. The driveway radius intersects the eastern end of the retaining wall. In situations similar to this, a combined driveway access serving both lots off 3030 Nrarbor Lane North Sidq.11, Suite 104 Minneapolis, MN. 53447 -2175 612/553 -1060 a W r a # 3'rly Dq. Planning Report April 16, 1990 . . Page 2 of Three Points Boulevard would be considered. In this case, # placement of the existing driveway which is already iqwed iatell adjacent to Lafayette Road d � y precludes this option. Therefore, is reasonable to consider access to these parcels off of the existing driveway easement that serves the well house and Harrison Shores. The developers site plan call for the construction of two single- family strictures, both of which have detached garages at the south side of the lots. Parcel B has a direct driveway access off of the existing driveway easement. The front wall of the gar *ge ft x: approximately 20 to 21 feet from the existing driveway. Access to Parcel A is via a new 10 foot easement over the rear of Parcel 8. The placement of the house and detached garage on Parcel A as shown on the Development Plan dated 4/3/90 is unacceptAble. The ara e opening faces east with a setback of 20 feet to the common lot line dividing Parcels A and B. Only 15 feet of paved driveway is proposed for the northerly half of the garage. This configuration does not allow adequate maneuvering room for vehicles exiting this property . The proposed house location on Parcel A is approximately 15 feet a south of the minimum front yard setback off of Three Pointsh Boulevard. Adequate maneuvering room could be created by moving the house approximately 15 feet to the north and rotating the garage so that the opening faces south. The area could be made even more workable by attaching the garage to the house. The grade change involved at the northwest corner of the house would only require about 1.5 feet of fill. RECOINIENDATION: Ideally, access to each of the proposed lots should be from Three Points Boulevard. In this case, existing topography combined with existing access to Three Points Boulevard precludes this option. Therefore, access via easement as proposed Is the only reasonable alternative. Modification of the Positioning of the home and garage on Parcel A will be necessary. Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park as proposed on the Lot Split Survey dated 4/3/90 subject to the following conditions: 1. The building placement for the home and garage for Parcel A shall be modified as generally described herein to allow adequate vehicular access to the garage area. 2. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's report. I A47 MoCaff a F** Roos AnockAw Im April 17, 1990 Ms. Jan Bertrand Planning and Zoning City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 15060 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 SUBJECT: Minor Subdivision Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park MRA 09329 Dear Jan: Telephone Engineers 612/476 -6010 Planners 612/476 -8532 FAX Surveyors As per your request. we have reviewed the material furnished with the above mentioned application for a lot split and have the following comments and recommendations. 1.) Mark and I have discussed the driveway situation, which he will address in his report. 2.) A manhole will need to be constructed over the end of the existing u" sewer service, then separate 4" service can be installed for each unit. 3.) The locati,m of the water services appear to be acceptable. Curb stops will need to be installed at the east line of Parcel B for each service. 4.) The City should have a guarantee that utility services will be provided for both parcels before the lot split is recorded at Hennepin County. This can be accomplished in a number of ways such as actual installation; escrow money, bond, etc. The applicant should submit either an estimated cost or a bona fide bid so the amount of surety can be determined. If you have any questions or need any adiicional information, please contact us. Very truly yours, 0 McCOMbS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC :aju An Fqunl I )ppuriumty E rnpoyet IR4E CITY OF FEES: t "0040 W Z 2 IM Case ..J"' Date APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND M inor Subdivision Application $50 Park Ded. Other Delinquent Taxes? yes / no , w k FiI t!@A or Subdivisions "reliminary Plat Final Plat Escrow Deposit Park Dedication Other (Please type or print the following informatitin.) R App 1 i cant's N ef c C KA* -r Day Phone Appl icent's Address - 1 ' - 1cV _V I'YIOUmA • 35 Fee Owner(s) c*7A#-Y5 7 PRoESET/ESXVC, _ r print name print name -14-619 7 GRAWh f1 •re mailing address )3 «i- £ , Al 55 33 7 mailing address • Signature of Fee Owner Signature oF 0 Own r jE ouJN�'�2 S /�N�Tt�i�E wi,e,� 16F, OB Tj9 /it/ s� —�' y cla y This app 1 I cat on must be signed by a 1 1 the ONNE of t property rr am explanation given why this is not the case. Property to be divideds Address /Locat ion � Y qx 3 T75, B 1 Vd Addition F- ,K A P � R Lot__ •Block PID # To-_be divided as follows: 3 - // 7 - r Q'a( c ! o Plat 04310 0 1JVATd kw Dkha %) 5o ' £,3r of ,0a7 #£l1ST coRN£X Io 3 PTS, BLVD . C& LE 60av r Q EZ/ oT5 fAd w1roil A r- Name of proposed subdivision: – 0 Existing Use of Property: Vi CdWZ Zoning Districts GNflAZInk To K'.3 O e K Oc (*i It r 3 Z3 1 s •Application for Subdivision Case No. ??-Z72-90 pipe TWO *on application ever been made for zoning, variance conditional use permit, or other zoning proce jre for t h i s property? e no If yes, list date (s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution numbers) R_s o [. urn ow 4V. '5714 (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.)' I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law Applicant's Si Date - 3 /0 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: a ning Commission Recommendation Date Council Action: Resolution No. Date • is 26 LOT SPLIT SURVEY 0 U P NTH A. T --- -- r A IIr way DEVELOPMENT PLAN pRt 6,0 • EAST l0000 nacTme way DEVELOPMENT PLAN pRt 6,0 • Legal Descriptions: Existing Property Lot 1, Block 1, ALEXANDER PARK Proposed Parcel A That part of Lot 1, Block 1, ALEXANDER PARK lying west of the east 50.00 feet of said Lot 1. Proposed Parcel B The east 50.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, ALEXANDER PARK. f 1 Proposed Driveway easement across Parcel B for Parcel A An easement for driveway purposes over and across the south 10.00 feet of the east 50.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, ALEXANDER PARK, Proposed Drainaage and Utility easement across Parcel A .'� An easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across the west 6.00 feet of east 56.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, ALEXANDER PARK. Proposed Drainage and Utility easement across Parcel B An easement for drainage and utilit purpose's - across the west 6.00 feet of the east 5 0- 00feet Lot Block 1, ALEXANDER PARK. Note: This survey was done without the benefit of current title research and may not show all easements which such research may divulge. I hereby certify that this survey wAs prepared by me or under my supervisl7.1 >nd that I am a duly registered land surveyor under Minnesota Statutes Section 326.02 V to 326.16. EREG IVMRE-D Reg. No. �yt Z l _ �O Date — • 11 I Hansen Thorp -1 Pellinen Olson Inc. ` Cenw4uN /ryf I 0 l.M afrv.wre 71e6 office Aw" Circle 140 Pismo, MN 66344-3044 of »s »•aa q y 3-90 JOa NO. 90.040 /a7o:z, U22, ;4.90,�'e3 i MID I fSo C �! 10 I •� 26 I I$ 1 1 1 I r t I'i3 Sol f or I - ALEXANDER PARK 40 4$43163 O or for 17 0. . s OF t t t I I I I APT 1 1 I I Port of Q __a SEAN( 1 )a�3 11 CITY ( i1Ol'ND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA CASE NO. 90 -915 NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES AT 2281 COMMERCE BLVD. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will et n the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday,, 1990 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow Temporary Seasonal Outdoor Retail Sales at 2281 Commerce Blvd., legally described as follows: • That part of Lot 52, Lynwold Park, Lake Minnetonka, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said lot; thence North along the East line of said lot, 58 feet; thence West and parallel with the North line of said lot, 125 feet; thence South and parallel with the East line of said lot to the South line of said lot; thence Easterly along the South line of said lot to the point of beginning, subject to an alley easement over the Easterly 12 feet of the Westerly 13 feet thereof and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. C _C�_ Francene C. Clark, City Clerk • Mailed to abutting property owners within 350' radius on May 11, 1990. Published in "The Laker" on May 7, 1990 (pre- published). ia� y • May 3, 1990 CHEMICALS USED ON CITY PROPERTY Ceme Pro Lawn applies three applications per year of fertilizer and herbicides for lawn maintenance. City Hail Pro Lawn applies three applications per year of fertilizer and herbicides for lawn maintenance. City sidewalks and retainina walls City employees apply a chemical named "Ranger" which Is similar to "Round -up" as needed. City Beaches Lake Management applies the following chemicals one time per year (mid- June): 240 Grandular - for milfoil Copper Sulfate - for algae Aquathail - for submerged vegetation These chemicals are applied to the following beaches: Mound Bay, Canary, Wychwood, Pembroke, Bluffs, and Chester. r� I A ?J • May 3, 1990 SURVEY We asked the following cities if they had an ordinance pertaining to application of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides on City property. All of these cities follow guidelines set by the Min- nesota Department of Agriculture. These cities have no ordinance controlling appl ±cation of chemi- cals to city property: Wayzata Minnetrista Orono Shorewood Spring1� Park Deephaven Minnetonka Long Lake Independence The City of Excelsior adopted Ordinance No. 185 on September 8, 1987 which states: "Prior to any application of pesticides on City -owned property, all proposed plans for such application shall be reviewed and approved by the City Manager and City Public Works Director. • la 76 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. • 15050 23rd Avenue North. Plymouth Minnesota 55447 Telephore 612 476 -60 612476 -8532 FAX E , -neers Planners Surveyors May 3, 1996 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 53 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: PER West Edge Boulevard CSAH 15 to Woodedge Place MFRA #7827 Dear Mayor and Council Members: As requested, we have reviewed the cost estimate contained in the Preliminary Engineering Report prepared in 1986 for the above mentioned project. Enclosed is a copy of said report. We have added an inflation factor of 25% to reflect 1990 prices, which results in a total estimated cost of approximately $112,000.00 for the street improvements as described in the original report. If the proposed assessments were computed in the same manner as in the original report with half of the total cost assessed to the Mound side of the street, the unit charge would be approximately $2,450.00 per unit, with a frontage charge of approximately $21.00 per front foot. Enclosed is a breakdown of the proposed assessments for the properties in Mound, using the revised cost estimates. Another item which needs to be addressed if this street is upgraded is the need to extend the existing 10" watermain. Enclosed is a copy of our report from 1986 with estimated costs. As with the street costs, the figures quoted for the watermain will also need to be increased by 25%. resulting in a revised estimated cost of $37.000.00 for Part A. A portion of this cost should be assessed and the remainder picked up by the City of Mound because of the oversizing of the main from 6" to 10 ". The Alwin and Homola properties are the only Mound properties that would benefit from the main extension. If they were to be assessed by the lineal foot, the charge would be approximately $22.00 per front feet. We feel this watermain extension is a necessity if the street is improved. US. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:jmj Enclosures City of Mound Minnesota. _ L To the City Council of Mound, Minnesota: We, the undersigned , owners of not less than 35 percent in frontage of the real property abutting on Westedae Blvd_ Street, between Railroad hridgP line of Westeed Blvd. Street and the CLY Rd 15 1ine of W�rgdge Blvd. Street hereby peti- tion that such street is improved by blacktopping pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429. only 1. 2. 3. 9 4. 5. _ 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Owner Description of Property i Examined, checked, and found to be in proper form and to be signed by the required number of owners of property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for. City Clerk t OWNER PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS TO MOUND PROPERTIES FOR STREET INPROVEMENTS UNIT FRONT FOOT P.I.D. CHARGE CHARGE TOTAL Alwin Sage Sells Allen Roeglin Roberts Homola • 14- 117 -24 33 0001 S 15.925.00 14- 117 -24 33 0007 1.225.00 14- 117 -24 33 0016 2,450.00 14- 117 -24 33 0017 2.450.00 14- 117 -24 33 0018 2.450.00 14- 117 -24 33 0019 2.450.00 23 22 0005 2.450.00 • Revised 05/03/90 MFRA #7827 S 14,116.00 S 30.041.00 4,200.00 5,425.00 1,974.00 4.424.00 1.995.00 4,445.00 2,016.00 4.466.00 1.995.00 4,445.00 1,260.00 3.710.00 10178 '4 McCOMBS•KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING EN6INEERS 8 LAND SURVEYORS N PLANNERS Rely To 1=900 Indw rsW Fork Sowlewd Plymouth, Wh"" son 55M1 I6121 SW3700 am 5, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 SIB,ECT: Proposed 10" Watermain Extension West Edge Boulevard WA File 07953 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: As directed by the Council at their last meeting, we have prepared a detailed cost estimate and proposed assessment roll for connecting the 10" watermains in West Edge Boulevard. Enclosed are these estimates and the proposed assessment. The 10" watermain extension (Part A) necessary to serve the proposed 22 lot subdivision adjacent to West Edge Boulevard between Canty Road 15 and Wood Edge Road is estimated to cost $29,600.00. We are suggesting that this 680 foot extension be paid for by the Developer in Minnetrista, except for the cost of oversizing the main from 6" to 10 ". The oversizing cost of approximately $4,760.00 (680 L.F. 9 $7.00 /LF) would be paid by the City of Maud. This portion of the 10" watermain extension should be constructed in conjunction with the proposed street improvements of West Edge Boulevard between County Road 15 and Wood Edge Road. The remaining 10" watermain extension (Part 9) necessary to loop the system back to the highlands water tower is estimated to cost $79,000. The oversizing cost for this project is estimated at $10,850.00 which we are suggesting be the City of Mounds responsibility. The remaining estimated project cost of $68,150.00 is proposed to be assessed to the benefitting properties. Due to the fact that this watermain project is located within the City limits of Mimetrista, the City of Mound can not access these costs directly. ia - 1 9 • June 5 1985 Page Two If the parcels responsible for paying for the project do not wish to have these costs assessed to their property by Minnetrista, then Mound would need to defer the assessments and charge the individual parcels at such time water service is requested. This charge should not only include the ociginsl assesomit but also interest charges. The problem with this method of fitwvMnp the project is that Mond would need to provide the project money up front and then be reimbursed as the assessments are paid or the connection charges are collected. I will be present at the Council meeting, Tuesday evening, to answer any questions you may have. Very truly yaws, McC%13S- KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Dom. L J John Cameron JC:cah 1A 90 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 10" WATERMAIN EXTENSION PAR A - KU EDGE BOULEVARD MOOD EDGE ROAD NORTH TO EXISTING 10" MAIN QUANTITY 10" O.I.P. Matermain 680 L.F. 6" O.I.P. Matermain 50 L.F. Fittings 1 LBS 10" Gate Valves 1 EACH 6" Gate Valves 4 EACH Hydrants 2 EACH 1" Mater Service Groups 3 EACH 1" Copper water Service 100 L.F. Granular Material 50 TON Contingencies UNIT PRICE 9 = 20.00 /L.F. • 16.00/L.F. 9 1.50/LBS • 700.00 /EACH s 40C.00/EACH • 1000.00/EACH : 13 800.00 1,500.00 700.00 1,600.00 2,000.00 • 80.00/EACH • 7.00 /L.F. t 8.00 /TON *Total Estimated Construction Cost Engineering, Legal, Fiscal and Administrative Costs Total Estimated Cost 700.00 400.00 2,160.00 E 23 = 5,900.00 $ 29 *NOTE: Estimate based on construction in conjunction with Street Improvement Project. EXHI8IT A FILE #7953 • • • 0 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE 10" WATERMAIN EXTENSION (PART B) - WEST EDGE BOULEVARD HALSTEAD LANE TO WOOD EDGE ROAR ITEM QUANTITY LINIT PRICE TOTAL 10" D.I.P. Watermain 1,500 L.F. a $ 20.00 /L.F. $ 30 8" D.I.P. Watermain 30 L.F. a 18.00/L.F. 540.00 6" O.I.P. Watermain 50 L.F. 8 16.00 /L.F. 800.00 Jacking 10" W.M. 50 L.F. 9 150.00/L.F. 7 Fittings 2 LBS 0 1.75 /LBS 3 10" Gate Valves 2 EACH s 700.00/EACH 1 8" Gate Valves 1 EACH • 550.00/EACH 550.00 6" Gate Valves 2 EACH f 400.00/EACH 800.00 Hydrants 2 EACH • 1000.00/EACH 2 Granular Material 150 TON a 8.00/TON 1 Street Restoration 6" -Class 2 1,000 TON 6 7.50 /TON 7 Roadside Seeding 3/4 ACRE a 2000.00 /ACRE 1 Contingencies 5,710.00 Total Estimated Construction Cost 63 Engineering, Legal, Fiscal and Administrative Costs s 16,000.00 Total Estimated Cost $ 79 • EXHIBIT B FILE !7953 ia8z 7 • Total Estimated Project Cost (Parts A 6 6) $ 108,600.00 Less Mound's Share for Oversi -q Main (2,230 LF 6 $7.00 /LF) 15,610.00 - Less Developers (Proposeu 22 Lot Subdi 24 840.00 to be 1 • $68 = 22 acres = $ 3,097.72 /Acre *This property is presently owned by the City of Mound 0 EXHIBIT C FILE 07953 i �$3 USE $ 3 /Acre Parcel A (22- 117 -24 11 0002) 16 Acres - • $3 /AC = $449,600 Parcel 8 (22- 117 -24 11 0003) 1 Acre 0 :3,100.00 /AC = 3,100 Parcel C (22- 117 -24 11 0004) 2 Acres t $3 /AC 6,200 «Parcel D (23- 117 -24 22 0005) 3 Acres It $3,100.00/AC = 9.300 TOTALS 22 Acres $68,200 *This property is presently owned by the City of Mound 0 EXHIBIT C FILE 07953 i �$3 � +010. J coo (1) '1 ! 910 Lz) 1 I Lp Lil all �p1.o9cS bQ V DI r w sJe�1 V { ► o ► , , O N S LOT 1 VILoV - ►O Wh ,l %k � 11 cs c.EL R'•' = V' 1 e " pQo�t7sE.� ► o' waTE4. Nw � _ ExTC�ts{oly I��w.�• b� • i Cpl • °l0 I i LM ___ i� It A# 1 y= � Irl, >, c t F I l.E 1a1S3 :rss1! Y ` � '� ,Y "• o • r tft P► M ;� , Ix �• v S EW ; �s� P►K� , I 36 O 11 11 / IDO -1 '!JO cl� of J114 w E 0 lb CT U T , 1 SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION CHARGE MAPLE HILLS EStATES Original Unit Assessment 9 Units • $292.00 /Unit Orig : ,..1 Footage Assessment (60' Minimum) 540 L.F. 0 $ 9.04 /L.F. Mound's Sewer Availability Charge 9 Units • $125.00 /Unit Proposed Total for Sanitary Sewer WATERMAIN Original Unit Assessment 9 Units 0 $ 65.61 /Unit Original Footage Assessment (60' Minimum) 540 L.F. 6 $ 4.87/L.F. Mound's Water Availability Charge 9 Units • $125.00 /Unit Proposed Total for Watermain EXHIBIT E - 0(. � S Proposed Total Utility Charge I' $ 2,628.00 $ 4,881.60 $ 1,125.00 $ 8,634.60 $ 590.49 $ 2,629.80 6 1,125.00 $ 4,345.29 $12,979.89 • PROPOSED AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION CHARGE PROPOSED 22 LOT SUBDIVISION SANITARY SEWER $ 6,424.00 $ 11 Availability Charge 22 Units 0 $125.00!Unit $ 2,750.00 Proposed Total for Sanitary Sewer $ 21,106.80 Original Unit Assessment 22 Units 0 $292.00 /Unit Original Footage Assessment 1320 L.F. 0 $ 9.O4/L.F. (60' Minimum) Mound's Sewer WATERMAIN Original Unit Assessment 22 Units 0 $ 65.61/Unit Original Footage Assessment 1320 L.F. 0 $ 4.87/L.F. (60' Minimum) Mound's Water Availability Charge 22 Units 0 $125.00 /Unit Proposed Total for Watermain P- oposed Total Utility Charge is EXHIBIT F $ 1,443.42 6,428.40 $ 2,750.00 $ 10,621.82 $ 31,728.62 ;a? • INCOME TO FUND FROM CONNECTION CHARGES FUR PRUPU5LD PLA15 IN MINNETRISTA MAPLE HILL ESTATES Sanitary Sewer $8,634.60 Watermain 4 345.29 Total - Maple Hills Estates ...................... ........$ 2,979.89 22 LOT SUBDIVISION Sanitary Sewer $21,106.80 Watermain 10 621.82 Total - 22 Lot Subdivision ............................ ••••• 3 ,728.6 TOTAL INCOME FROM PROPOSED PLATS IN MINNETRISTA ............ $44,708.51 is EXHIBIT G 0 lM, rm hd l COMBS- KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ MANNERS 0 RWV To: 12800 InduttrW Park Boulward Plymouth, Minrwwtu 55411 18121 559.3700 January 21, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mayor and Council Members: As requested, we are herein submitting a Preliminary Engineering Report for • proposed street improvements on west Edge Boulevard from County Road 15 south to woodedge Road. If you have any questions or need additional information on anything in this report, we will be pleased to discuss this further with you at your • convenience. 40 Very truly yours, McCOMBS -*WSON ASSOCIATES, INC. e Cameron I . JC: jm j r� i aAl • PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT STREET IMPROVEMENTS WEST EDGE BOULEVARD FROM COUNTY ROAD 15 SOUTH TO MOODEDGE ROAD CITY OF MOUND • January, 1986 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of State of Minnesota. 1- 21- 86.... . ...............Minn. Reg. No. 10206 oos 10,-(g0 i GENERAL The Mound City Council has ordered this Preliminary Engineering Report an the improvement of west Edge Boulevard after receiving a notice from the City of Minnetrista of a pending development adjacent to west Edge Boulevard. Utility connections to Mounds sanitary sewer and watermain has been requested to serve the proposed residential subdivision. west Edge Boulevard, which would receive the traffic generated from this proposed development, is presently a rural type gravel road running from County Road 15 south to the northeast corner of woodcrest of Mound. From that point it becomes a paved Mound City Street. Most of the traffic accessing from the proposed subdivision onto west Edge Boulevard will travel north to County Road 15. To travel in a southerly direction, vehicles must pass through an old, dangerous Burlington Northern railroad underpass. This railroad line is now operated by Dakota Railroad, but has not been improved. For these reasons, this report covers only the portion of west Edge Boulevard adjacent to the proposed plat. DESIGN {, width The width proposed is a 24 foot bituminous mat with concrete curb ` and gutter. These dimensions are consistent with the portion of west Edge Boulevard already upgraded further to the south. Presently, this street has 1. approximately a 22 foot wide gravel surface. l - Typical Section Based on Minnesota road design stancards it is proposed to construct the roadway with a 6 gravel base and surfacing consisting of 2" . of bituminous base and 1 -1/2" of bituminous wearing course. This is approximately a 7 ton design which is greater than the design used on a I - standard Mound residential street. The reason for the extra strength is that this street has the potential to become a collector street should the railroad bridge be rebuilt and additional development be realized in Minnetrista. The 1- design also allows for a future upgrading to a full 9 ton collector road should 1 future traffic volumes warrant the work. I01�.II Concrete Curb A Gutter BUS curb and gutter is suggested for this street, since all but 3 of the proposed lots will take access from internal streets within the proposed development. There are no existing entrances on the Mound side of the proposed street. Storm Sewer There presently exists a small pond within the proposed subdivision with an outlet through a culvert under West Edge Boulevard. The drainage then continues via a small ditch through private property to the j railroad ditches and eventually into Lake Longdon, we are proposing to replace the existing culvert under West Edge Boulevard with a 21" reinforced concrete pipe and construct 2 catch basins for street drainage in the proposed curb line. Additional drainage studies will be required to determine if the now pipe should be set at the same elevation as the old culvert, thus maintaining the pond at its historic level. This can be done at the time of final plans, if the project should advance to that stage. 1 Grading The proposed grading has been held to a minimum, with the bulk of 1 1 the required fill being provided by adjusting existing street grades. The existing, steep approach from west Edge Boulevaro onto County Road 15 is very {" undesirable and dangerous. It is proposed to improve it as much as possible and provide a flat approach that will have stacking space for at least one car. This design still uses a grade equal to the existing grade of 1. approximately 13%. To improve this grade to a more desirable R6 to 10% would require additional fill material from the proposed development. This is a I _ possibility that will be pursued during final design should the project proceed. I: SANITARY SEWER & WATERMAIN L There are no costs included in this report for city utilities except for the adjustment of manholes, hydrants and gate valves prior to road construction. The existing 10 watermain in west Edge Boulevard will need to be extended by the developer in order to serve the proposed subaivision, 1 however, that work and the associated costs should not be the responsibility of the City of Mound. Any stubs for main extensions or service extensions from 1 JAZZ 1 the existing mains would be included as part of the street improvement and assessed directly to the benefiting properties. The existing pain does have one tee at about station 5+00 which would be extended to the easterly R/M line. COST " The estimated cost of the street construction previously described is $89,740.00. This figure does not include any cost for easement acquisition, but it does include 10% contingencies and 20% for engineering, legal, fiscal and administrative cost. A detailed breakdown of the cost is attached to this report. • ASSESSMENTS � we would suggest that the property on the west side of the proposed Improvement be assessed for the cost of the storm sewer. This would amount to 55 including contingencies engineering, legal, fiscal and administrative II• costs. This leaves $83,840.00 to be divided equally between the properties on • I� each side of the proposed street construction. The cost to the developer of I ' the proposed subdivision in Minnetrista would be $47,820.00. On the Mound side of the project we are suggesting using a modified form of the I• street improvement assessment policy used in the past. This policy assessed 30% of the cost by the front foot, 30% of the cost by the square foot and 40% l • of the cost as a unit charge. Because there is no storm sewer cost to be assessed to the Mound properties, we propose to assess 50% of the cost I� ($20 by the front foot and 50% of the cost ($20,960.00) on a unit l_ charge. The total assessable footage on the Mound side is 1281.7 feet which I - results in a rate of $16.35 per front foot. I we have assigned a total of 11 units to the properties abutting the `- proposed street. If 11 units are used, the cost per unit would be $1,905.00. The following is a breakdown of the proposed assessment for the properties in l _ Mound. I. • C *4CL.USIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS It is the opinion of the Engineer that the proposed improvffa t is technically feasible and can best be accomplished as described herein. J a9 y UNIT FRONT FOOT OWNER P.I.D. CHARGE CHARGE TOTAL, Sage 14- 117 -24 0007 $ 953.00 $ 3 $ 4 9 723.00 Sage F 'atr 14- 117 -24 0014 1 1 3,213.00 Anderson 14- 117 -24 0013 5,715.00 5,395.00 11 Alwin 14- 117 -24 0001 12,383.00 10,990.00 23 TOTALTO BE ASSESSED ............................... ...... $41,919.00 • C *4CL.USIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS It is the opinion of the Engineer that the proposed improvffa t is technically feasible and can best be accomplished as described herein. J a9 y CONTINGENCIES 6,795. TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 74,780.00 • ENGINEERING, LWAL FISCAL 8 ADMINISTRATIVE COST 14,960.00 f� TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $89,740.00 1. Ia1S ESTIMATED COST is EDGE BOULEVARD ESTIMATED ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL Clearing d Grubbing LUMP SUM ; 1,500.00 Cmm Excavation 2 C.Y. s 3.00 /CY 7,500.00 Subgrade Excavation 600 C.Y. 3.50 /CY 2 Granular Borrow 600 C.Y. 5.00 /CY 3 Gravel Base C1.5 1,100 TONS 7.25/TN 10 Bit. Base Course (2331) 410 TONS 27.00 /TN 11,070.00 Tads Coat 180 GAL. 1.50 /GA 270 -00 Bit. Hear Course (2341) 300 TONS 25.00/TN 7 Coner. Curb 4 Gutter (8618) 2,740 L.F. 5.50 /LF 15 Adjust Gate Valve 1 EACH 150.00/EA 150.00 Adjust Manhole 4 EACH 200.00 /EA BOOM Adjust Hydrant & G.V. 1 EACH 300.00 /EA 300.00 21" R.C.P. Storm Sewer 50 L.F. 35.00 /LF 1 Catchy Basins w /Castling 2 EACH 900.00 /EA 1 ' 21" R.C.P. Aprons 2 EACH 450.00 /EA 900.00 Black Dirt 500 C.Y. 7.00 /CY 3,500.00 Seed 1 -1/4 ACRES 500.00 /AC 625.00 CONTINGENCIES 6,795. TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 74,780.00 • ENGINEERING, LWAL FISCAL 8 ADMINISTRATIVE COST 14,960.00 f� TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $89,740.00 1. Ia1S "I R/W TYP I GAL STREET SECTION "O lVAL-2 W 6STG C>&Q BILV D. JIM E MINNEAPOLIS COMBS- KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. PROPOSED STREET IMPROV0010 �� WW HUTCIUNSON.MINNESOTA 7827 L.ITY O F MOUND ) (May 2. 1990) We, the undersigned, hereby respectfully petition the city of Mound, Minnesota to recognize and to act on the following requests: 1. That the curbing on the entire length and on both sides of Halstead Lane, City of Mound, MN, is higher than need be, that the present curbing is unsafe to vehicles entering and exiting the driveways, and that the present curbing is lacking in properly built driveway entrance aprons. 2. That the City of Mound replace every driveway curb area with a properly installed concrete driveway apron, as described by the City of Mound Building Inspector's office. 3. That the City of Mound bear the entiro total cost of the above curbing /apron replacement for each resident driveway on Halstead Lane as designated. (See Amendment A below.) AMENDMENT A: The above words " Halstead Lane" shall be understood tc, mean the entire area on or encompassing Halstead Lane in the area commonly known as the Woodcrest Division of Mound. Minnesota. • May 3, 1990 iI \ 11 `1\ /L ,, \ / ^ + WN ESOTA 5`6354 f'2, 472 -'t55 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL �4 FROM: ED 3HU[L£, CITY MANAGER RE: STATUS OF SHORELINE DRIVE BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING REQUEST The Shoreline Beavtification Committee came to the City Council at the last regular meeting requesting assistance ire a matching funds program to provide assistance to property owners along County Road 15, to make planting improvements per the plan developed through the Chamber of Commerce. The city attorney gave the opinion that the City could not do this type of a • matching program arrangement due to the fact that most of the property involved is private property. Mr. Jim Ventura, who was present at the meeting on behalf of the Beautification Committee, indicated that the City of Spring Park's city attorney had given his okay to this type of program, and that perhaps the City of Mound could contact the City of Spring Park regarding that opinion. After the meeting, "The Laker" news reporter, Lori Hamm, informed the city attorney that she was at the meeting Mr. Ventura referenced. She indicated to the city attorney that the attorney for Spring Park was not present at the meeting and no opinion was issued by the City of Spring Park. It is the opinion of the city attorney and myself, that the City cannot get involved in any type of a matching funds program. Therefore, it appears that the program will not work and we will have to rely on the individual property owners in doing something to beautify the road. Unless we want to offer the program to every property owner in Mound, therre isn't anything we can do. If you have any questions, please contact me. ES:ls • lA� 941 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD 01T ■' of , I /U \ / MO ND M N ESOTA 55369 +6121472 -1155 MaY 39 1990 TO: CENTRAL BUSINE33 DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER .S- RE: POSSIBLE ACQUISITION OF C8D PARKING LOTS FROM DAKOTA RAIL Some of you are aware of the discussions we have had over the last year regarding the possible acquisition of parking lots from Dakota Rail. You may or may not know that Dakota Rail was in • bankruptcy for some time and recently was purchased through the bankruptcy court by Mr. Elli Mills of Largo, Florida. The City of Mound and Central Business District property owners have been working together on a possible acquisition of lots that are currently leased through the CBD Parking Maintenance Program for municipal parking purposes. About 9 months ago, the City requested an option from the railroad representative for $1.50 per square foot. The trustee in bankruptcy was unwilling to accept that price because the reorganization or sale was pending before the bankruptcy court. Since Mr. Mills has bought the property through bankruptcy, we have had discussions with him regarding the purchase. Mr. Mills has indicated in our discussions that he would like to sell the property at a price of $250,000, which equates to somewhere between $q and $5 per square foot (NOTE: the properties are on the north side of the railroad tracks, on the east side of Commerce Blvd. and on the south side of the railroad tracks north of County Road 15, across from the House of Noy Restaurant) We indicated to Mr. Mills that his numbers were totally unrealistic and that the City assessor had indicated that $2 to $2.25 per square foot would be the market price for the land. Some of you know that we have had meetings recently talking about • these properties for municipal parkirg and what the price should be that we pay for the lands and discussed an assessment approach to the purchase of the properties. You have provided feedback, lall Mr. Ed Shukle. City Manager 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55364 .J- .1 r.; sir Ile / v RECD MAY 7 IWO Dear Mr. Shukle. *We received your letter of clay 3rd regarding the CBD Item for discussion before the City Council May 8th. We will be out of town May 8th but will provide Input and feedback on the CBD Issue via this correspondence. Since we cannot be present would you kindly read this letter aloud at the meeting. With your letter, you enclosed a copy of a letter dated April 11, 1990, from the city attorney. which you stated "presents the entire Issue quite will and asks a series of questions that need to be answered ". Our answers to some of the questions: Ouestion # 1. "Is It desirous to acquire land for parking In the Central Business District ?" Yes. Ouestion * 3. "Who should pay the cost of acquiring said iand ?" Any portion of the cost not paid for by the City should be paid for by the property owners who have not provided their parking needs. They now have the unusual opportunity of acquiring the parking needs which are vital for the protection of their business and real estate Investments. If they are not willing to make that Investment there Is no need to continue further • negotiations with Dakota Rail. It would be unfair to the property owners who are purchasing their parking needs to also have to help pay for the parking needs of those property owners who have not made that investment. I called Henneping County Property Tax Information today at 348 -3046. I spoke with Dan Salzadel for Information about the "market value" of our parking lot for tax purposes and the amount of tax we pay per square foot. I was advised the "market value" is $2.27 per square foot and the tax Is 5.06% because the valuation Is over $100,000. therefore we are payine approximately 11 cents per square foot In real estate tax. We are leasing the property to the CBD for 12 cents per square foot. That 1 cent per square foot doesn't pay principal and Interest but owning our parking lot helps protect our Investment. Ouestion s 6. "Are the property owners in the CBD- - - - - -- willing to continue to pay maintenance expenses on into the indefinite future" As song as we continue to be members of the CBD we are w1111ng to continue to pay our pro rata portion of the snow plowing, striping & all other expenses of all the CBD lots. If we should be assessed for the costs of Purchase of the parking needs of other property owners we will terminate our CBD membership and be responsible for the maintenance of our parking lot for the exclusive use of our tenants. Thankyou. .Yours truly, M. E. Mueller & Philip Lansing Mueller /Lansing properties • Memo to CBD Property Owners May 39 1990 which we have used in our negotiations with Mr. Mills. However, it is the opinion of the city attorney and myself that Mr. Mills' price is unrealistic. This issue will be discussed further at the City Council meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 8 1990. The City Council meeting will begin following the annual. Board of Review, and this item is later on in the agenda. I am inviting you to attend and provide any input or feedback that you might have with regard to this issue. We are going to try to establish a direction in which to take regarding the possible acquisition of the lots. It is the opinion of the city attorney and myself, that property owners who will benefit from the lands acquired for parking purposes, have to be more affirmative in their desires and willingness to pay. I am enclosing a letter dated April 11, 1990, from the city attorney, which presents the entire issue quite well and asks a series of questions that need to be answered. The CBD property owners are a part of making this decision since it is likely that the City would be assessing you for a portion of the cost. Thus, . we would like your feedback as we talk about the issue in a public forum. If you cannot attend the meeting next week, please contact me with your thoughts. I look forward to hearing from you or seeing you at the meeting next week. ES:ls • 2 1300 LAW Orricts WURST. PEARSON, LARSON- UNDERWOOD 6 NIERTZ A .ANTNtASN$p INCIV8INO VRO.t{GIONAL A {gOCIATIOMf 1100 FIRST BANK PLAC[ WCST A TNoNAs WuRST, P A. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 56402 TsL9p"ONe CNRTIS A. PtARSON. P.A. 151,1 336.4!00 JANSS 0. LARSON. P.A April 11, 1990 TNONAS F. UNpSRW000. P.A. ►AR Nuw990 CRAN3 M. McRrz MR) aas -ssas 00690 J. FsLLOWS REC'U APR 13 ibW Mr. Ed Shukle City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Res Central Business District Parking Dear Ed We have had numerous conversations recently concerning the Possibility of acquiring land from Dakota Rail for the purpose of establishing parking lots in the Central Business District. There are in particular two parcels of land lying north and south of the railroad tracks and east of Commerce Boulevard. In negotiations with the prior owners and the trustee in bankruptcy, I have conveyed to them the suggestion that they grant an option to the City to sell the lands to the City for the sum of $1.50 per square foot. The railroad has recently been sold to Elli Mills and . Associates by the Bankruptcy Court. Mr. Mills and his associates are now desirous of marketing certain pieces of real estate owned by the railroad. Subsequent to a recent meeting with Mr. Mills, you met with some of the downtown business people who would be affected by the acquisition of these parking areas or the failure to acquire these parking areas. You have indicated to me that the consensus of those people is that the City should buy the lots and should pay the most substantial portion for the acquisition of the properties. You have indicated to me that you would like to have me lay out some basic questions and procedures as to how we should proceed. In respor.'se to those inquiries and in an effort to put on paper some of the things we discussed, I respond as follows. I am going to set forth below a series of questions which I believe must be addressed and which will conclude by my establishing certain recommendations as to proceeding. This may be helpful to you and /or members of the business district in considering whether to proceed and how to proceed. 1. Is it desirous to acquire land for parking in the Central Business District? 2. If it is necessary and desirous to acquire said land, how much land is needed? 0 1301 WORST, PtARSON, LARRON, UNDERWOOD i McRTt J 3. Who should pay the cost of acquiring said land? 4. Is there legal authority for the City to be a participant in acquiring parking facilities? The answer is yes, authority is found under Minnesota Statutes Section 459.14. 5. Would it be to the property owners' advantage to acquire the lands in their own name and to have fee title to the property? 6. Are the property owners in the CBD who need parking willing to pay the costs of acquiring land and constructing parking facilities and then are they willing to continue to pay maintenance expenses on into the indefinite future? 7. Bow do we proceed to establish some basic cost parameters for land acquisition, construction and projected maintenance costs? 8. Should the City continue to expend money to negotiate an option to purchase the lands and to do other planning and to carry on other professional activities to construct parking facilities without a commitment from the private property owners of their willingness to pay all or a portion of those costs? 9• Can we negotiate a satisfactory purchase price with the new owners of Dakota Rail? 10. If we cannot negotiate a satisfactory purchase price, can the City acquire the lands under eminent domain? The answer is yes, the City has the authority to acquire the lands under eminent domain for municipal parking facilities. 11. Are parking meters, attended parking lots, or other revenue - producing ideas feasible in the CBD? Ed, the above questions are only a stert on how we need to a oacb. o ;duly faabioo.... lt. is ay- opinion .that the properly; o,'V9! s vho .bsAefit. from the lands acquired and the be arkin co P A nstructed have to Liraativa. io, their desires and thei have attd to me that you think the City Council MIGHT wake a contribtitiow, r li6 8 not bWiebe' that under any circumstances that amount•w6d1d Wx6ded 1304Z WORST, PEARSON. CA RSON, UNDERWOOD 6 MERTZ 0 5001 There are political ramifications which have to be understood and con idered since there is a basic philosophical question which someone will raise as to why the general taxpayer should contribute funds to buy land to benefit private business operators. The authority to acquire lands and to construct municipal parking facilities is in the statute, but whether the City will want to make those expenditures is a political decision which has not been made. It also must be understood that acquiring the land and constructing the parking areas are only the beginning and that there will be on -going and continuous maintenance requirements, just as there is today for the ex tral Business District parking. a me that r �e t s - beelLopositioA_by the_ e r6e current status of our.discuaiiSi�4s.Mit,�!lr.,. IZ,,iIla is such that we are ra apart in price. It • g.�ea�,e ,,.04kt,, tj d should be wortN touiil� 54.00: r sqt�� .. thkr aapp ps a fiiUd `on' a�sa�e of eUft1 �� UMh bakoti o a local busi nessman The problem with that analogy is that those lands had improve ments on them in the form of a� building and the purchaser really ad little choice because failure to purchase would have resulted in a loss of the building improvement. The Savings and Loan located on the corner of Commerce and Shoreline apparently will be faced with the same dilemma in the near future where they will either have to acquire the land or lose their structure. On 4 g .pfQ�et�4sional . opi ��.g... ay..e„ 0 „ foirimaie�y one -hal g'E' was , I sties is c 1f X e true _market valu ou i`av! "t'�e' J& 4,j FF ,,q& .,, _ 4� directed me. rr �rAx >ad 4&"oot. KAM,& ,ad. Y .hay.. � ►. nuiby to do a ng use w atever arguments I can to show that" Ne fiave now back old City records and found a k iicense for the c nstruction of a sanitary sewer which goes through the lot across from the House of Noy, and that makes it very doubtf 1 as to whether that property would be buildable for commercial purposes. }�mGgntinuing r to daal with Ni; Mills ana rill continue those negotiations iligently, but / do not believe our _ fa �.re ..ta ,set,an�,ppxiop Bhoul0 determine how you r t approach this with'ihe business community and the City Council. r Ed, I think there has to be a basig,decisio9 on the pa -t of the busineel comsinnity as to'tblirjneed16i'th'iet p0t0i #nd "Eb`ir'villiagaess 4 4 .pay, if they don't feel. they need parking;pt.Sf tbay.drq not willing e pay for it, we are really: Wasting 6tlt. time i�na 'CjfntjA ,pu,�4tliii4, the tter.: If they are in favor and do see that this is needed as a public 'improvement, I suggest they petition the City Council for a publi� 1103 WURST. PEARSON, LA RS ON, UNDERWOOD 6 Menu Apr e!­-MM*sota r rk to c tha!„re eu3 riov"48t eiai 1st 1� "a"t ?iib the _ ters._jno�lkely'�.�i't'7 on thi. lok "Cfiot Iik" , rl t t a i tlable to. oaptbrsjp nd 4S • - Of on "r`iceipt sa +tb' _ ansices of a 1 r_e_a feaktul tY kepott.. n eaginier be 'Viven dtoft 14�t�rMelt ors �o to' pert?. W.. eta "Qr l0' tQ..o .,.for the � lonila !d' p�ria9'�onts �ep�S`tE s question -ai to whether tbeses" rkinq_ J parkia�,irii ��dtnt .. r be Uaseg ik! havi,to beuia i aAt`ost heariuq 1 . Mhit ., tb4le vvpaotea•. Vo* s and 'oo M rrs*a v VON OA 9pl v gn Yw • have financing re resents no£ im v nts"be specially assessed: Can Me"i�ovneft to the - INU'slt wnd the City proceed unless it bad the IV t6e'6aMe98 ! • - k. . WK Ir'd oats RIM Vigo' Ment l Ed, in conclusion, these are the kinds of questions which came to my mind after our discussion of April 10. The land is only a part of the ultimate conclusion. Improvements, on -going maintenance, special assessments, etc. are all facts that have to be taken into consideration. In the final conclusion, that study will have to be balanced with the Council's desire to make a commitment on behalf of the general public. We as a City need to pull it together, but it does not seem to me there is any way to proceed without the enthusiastic support of the people who will benef it from the improvement. S gerely, ) urtis A. earson CAP:lh City Attorney 1301 E 1990 DOCK REFUNDS RECEIPT NAME ADDRESS REASON AMOUNT i 32270 Cindy L. Smith 4440 Radnor Road Nothing Avail. $150.00 32513 Tammy Rask 5109 Dri mond Rd Nothing Avail. 155.00 31872 Keith Lindgren 2235 Largdon Ln Share 21170 47.25 31873 Linda Ledray 4016 Beacawood Rd Share 21170 32.25 31874 Thomas Bozlinski 6247 Bayridge Rd Share 20430 53.50 31886 Michael Fox 5700 Lynwood Blvd Share 20430 42.50 32115 David Boyd 5936 Gumwood Rd Share 10340 52.50 32162 Richard Boyd 2996 Bluffs Dr Share 10340 52.50 32084 Delores Nelson 1731 Wildhurst Ln Holding fee only 115.00 . #10700 32461 Jay Westlund 1927 Shorewood Ln Refund Share Fee 30.00 32422 Kevin Makowski 6016 Cherrywood Rd Share 21140 52.25 31901 Robert Johns 2965 Oaklawn Ln Share 21140 62.25 31883 Gregory Nelson 4432 Lamberton Rd Nothing Avail. 145.00 31922 Edward Linn 3117 Priest Lane Nothing Avail. 135.00 17-� 13057 • • 0 BILLS - - - -- -MAY 8, 1990 BATCH 0043 BATCH 0044 Unitog Rental uniform rental Westonka Sanitation Oec,Jan,Feb,Mar garbage TOTAL BILLS 72,217.18 116,645.12 417.47 421.82 189.701.59 /304 pill I PURCHASE JOURNAL SATE 4/30/ AR�OOQ -01 CITY OF HOUND TIRE 16.12.9 weM INVOICE ME HOW PIE -MID Clon Mt. MICE Mkt WE DATE STATUS ANOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NITER AMOUNT CHECK 1 SATE A04% FIE -MID 600.00 EFFECTIVE NOW SIZIONS-SIME 01- 4399 - 4100 4/30/90 4/30190 600./0 AL-CO 1010 600.00 30459 4/Y3/90 ATTITUDE OEVELL &V R134W VENDOR TOTAL 600.00 1060 PRE -PALO 993.19 LID 71-71009510 4/30/90 4/30/90 993.19 JIDL-CO 1010 993.19 30461 4/24/90 MISR COMOMTION VENDOR TOTAL 993.19 mo ME-MID 3,701.00 CA UNION 4/14 PR 01. 2040.0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 3,101.00 AL-CO 1010 3701.00 30W9 4/19/0 CIO AMT CREDIT twom W= TOTAL 3701.00 01931 PIE-PAID 17.70 P/C- SI/FLIES 01- 41411-2200 13.59 P/C-l/S 01- 41103210 4/30/90 4/30/90 31.29 JML-C/ 1010 31.29 3MI 4/17/90 PRE -PAID 34.05 RKEN P/C-PO CE 01- 41402200 4/31/90 4/30190 31.06 ,AL-CD loto 31.63 3OW 4/24190 cm OF 1 VENDOR TOTAL 66.34 004'23 PIE -MID 1,107.00 Tim TAX 60. 6000 - 'M 51.00 110 LICENSE - MW 6060002200 677.21 ' 90 DTNASTT TAI 01. 40105000 677.28 '90 DTWSTY TAI 61- 41905000 25.50 '90 11110611 LSCENW, 01- 4190.4140 • 23.50 '90 DTMETT LICENSE 01- 40104110 4/30/90 4/30/90 9.264.36 JRK-CD 1010 3264.36 30132 4/11/90 PRE -MID 17410 LICENSE FEE - DYNASTY 01- 10104110 174.50 LICENSE FEE- OTWSTT 01.090.4140 4!AI" 4/30/90 30.00 AL-Cl 1010 30.00 30466 4/24/90 CIO SA 1NTIATA "no TOTAL 3613.36 OD9+9 PIE -IM10 241.10 NA LIFE INS 01 2010.0000 4/30/90 4/30/40 241.M JAK-CD 1010 241.10 30154 4/19/90 N ICIAL LIFE DRS CO NOW TOTAL 231.10 C10ot PIE -MID 71.21 NAKH STALES TAI 79 -3'612 -0000 6,112.39 MID SATES ?AS 71-3P2 -0000 MAR" 4/30/90 6 JRK-m 1010 6190.60 30W0 4/171" ME-PAID 1,405.17 SIT 4/14 PR 01- 2040-0000 4/30190 4/30190 1,405.17 JRK-CD 1010 7405.17 30W2 4/19/90 PIE -MID 362.07 SIT- KRTRAND 011 82. 2040 -0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 362.07 JRK -CD 1010 362.07 30181 4/25/90 CO NISSIOIER OF AEVEIRE VEIMdt TOTAL 8957.84 0o V 3 01:19 °K -PAID 291.84 32 CONTRACT HOURS 81 -4350 -3100 joysL - j.yi }' • PAM 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4/30/90 AP- 002.01 CITY OF M10 TINE 16.12.59 VENOON twirl ME W" PRE -PAID OEM NO. 10 0lCE MMR DATE DATE STATUS NOW DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT Nl1ffR AMOUNT 0164 8 DATE RMT 4/30/90 4/30190 291.84 JDL-CD 1010 291.84 30435 4/17/90 kWLPN YNOR TOTAL 291.84 E1429 PIE -PAID 129.20 LID 71- 7100 -9510 111.90 MINE 71- 7100 -9520 2.58- DISC 71- 7100.9560 20.90 MIX 71-7100 -9540 4/30190 450/90 259.42 JK-CD 1010 259.42 30438 4/17/90 PRE -PAID 406.07 LID 71- 7100-9510 700.10 MINE 71-7100-9520 8.11- DISC 71- 7100 -9560 4/30190 4/30/90 1,048.06 AL-0 1010 1098.06 30464 4/24/90 a PHILLIPS i m VENDOR TOTAL 1357.48 111820 PRE -PAID 286.% ML WIDEN CONTROL, STA 01-4140 -5000 803.04 on 01 -4140 -2200 54.00 MTTERY 01- 4280 -2200 116.20 IEPAIR POTENTIOMETER 01- 4140 -3820 4/30/90 4/30190 1,260.20 AL-CO 1010 1260.20 30468 4/24/90 818 m co U ICATI06 Vl3OM TOTAL 1260.20 On PIE -PAID 110.00 STATE FIRE SDI -BABE 22- 4170 -4110 4/30190 4/30/90 110.00 JK_CD 1010 110.00 30470 4/24/90 ou BARB Yom TOTAL 110.00 019% ME -PAID 1,305.00 REF COP 4/14 'R 01-2040 -0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 1,305.00 AL-0 1010 1305.00 30116 4/19/90 tIENf IEDT LIFE A99U0 L'E VENDOR TOTAL 1305.00 81911 PIE -MID 268.81 MAY HOSP 01 -2040 -0000 4/30/90 4/30190 268.87 AL-CD 1010 268.87 30452 4/19/90 WAIN PLAN Wm TOTAL 268.87 111m PRE -MID 2,241.80 LID 71- 7100 -9510 75.64 MINE 71- 7100-9520 46.35- DISC 71 -7100 -9560 14.70 FRT 71.7100 -9600 4/30190 4/%/90 2,265.79 AL-CD 1010 2285.79 30436 4/17/90 PRE -MID 39.92 MIX 71-7100 -9540 173.59 MINE 71-7100 -9520 4.27- DISC 11-1100 -'560 4.41 FRT 71-7100-9600 4!30/ 0/30/90 213.65 J84--CD 1010 213.65 30462 4/24/90 WOOS COOPER i COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 2499.44 H2015 PIE -PAID 55.40 C.O.M. KTG DINNER 01- 4020 -4120 • 4/30/90 4/30/90 55.40 JIK-CD 1010 u.40 30433 4/17/90 130 8 plis 3 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4/70/90 N- CO2.0i CITY OF HOUND TIME 16.12.9 ow INVOICE CITE HOLD PRE -PAID OEM ID. I l010E NN]R DATE DATE STATUS VOW DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUNDNER 49M DID 1 DATE HAPPY CARDEH YE)DOI TOTAL 55.40 KH45 PRE -PAID 288.46 OED 4/14 PR 01-2040-0000 4!30190 4/30/90 288.46 AL-CD 1010 288.45 30448 4/19190 NO CO SUPPORT i C O LECTf YOM TOTAL 288.46 KISO PiE -PAID 41.00 EASDEW GRANTS 01-4320 -4100 4/30190 4/30/90 41.00 JIOL-CD 1010 41.00 30130 4/17/90 160 CO TIEAEAER YOM TOTAL 41.00 12301 PIE -PAID 512.90 DEF Cali 4/14 PR O1 -2040 -0000 4r30/90 4/30/90 512.90 J K-CD 1010 512.90 30445 4/19/90 10111 NETINEW TAIIJST -457 VENDOR TOTAL 512.90 11304 PRE -PAID 91.90 IOIA 4/14 PR 01- 2040 -400 4/30/90 4/30/90 91.90 JIOI-CD 1010 91.90 30444 4/19/90 IOM RETIM Mi VW -401 VENDOR TOTAL 91.90 12710 PIE -PAID 300.05 LINK COW 01-4040-4110 4/30/90 4/30/90 300.03 J K-CD 1010 300.05 30450 4/23/90 DNINERNATL INSTITUTE N1MICf WDCR TOTAL 300.05 J2571 PIE -PAID 315.25 40.5 CONTRACT FORS 01-4340 -3100 O 4/30190 4/30/90 315.25 J111L -CD 1010 315.25 30434 4/17/90 All T6FE YOM TOTAL 313.25 .8579 PIE -PAID 079.22 LID 71-7100 -9510 532.15 MINE 71-7100 -9520 22.94- DiM 71- 7100 -4560 4/70/90 4/30/90 1,36.43 JRNL-CD 1010 1398.43 30437 4/17/90 PRE -PAID 2,868.63 LID 71-7100 -0510 435.42 MINE 71-7100-9520 61.73- DiSC 71- 7100-9560 4/30190 4/30190 3,242.34 JlK-C9 1010 3242.34 30463 4/24190 JIMNMI ONOS IMIILESILE Llf VENDOR TOTAL 4630.77 1.2010 449E -PAID 155.00 L![ COW 5/12-15- 9111LE 01-4020-4110 4/30/90 4130190 155.00 JRNL-co 1010 155.00 30103 4/25/90 LEAME OR 0 CITIES YE DOR TOTAL 155.00 113051 PREPAID 16,633.40 FIT 4/14 PR 01-2040-0000 4!30/90 4/30/90 10,633.40 AL-CD 1010 10633.40 30441 4/19190 PRE -PAID 1,760.31 FiT- BERTRANAD SM 82 -2040 -0000 4r30/90 4/30190 1,76P,31 JK-CD 1010 1760.31 30480 4/25/90 • ma PAK 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 4/30190 M-0O2-01 CITY OF POW TIME 16.12.59 Vm INVOICE ME HOLD PRE -PAID DECK W. INVOICE NCR DATE DATE STATIE AIIm DESCRIPTION ACCOWT WMBER ANOW DECK 0 DATE 4r TE MIN( - MIND VEtEQt TOTAL 1:393.71 PREPAID 1,316.56 MAY HOSP 01-2040 -0000 4/30/00 4/30/90 1,316.56 JK-CD 1010 1316.56 30453 4/10/90 0 CDMTER IEALTiI PLAN VJIDDN TOTAL 1316.56 "3166 PRE -PAID 311.00 AIR/[ INC COIF 01-4040-4110 4/30/90 4/30/90 311.00 JW -CD 1010 311.00 30428 4/17/90 METTRD TRA& i TOURS YOM TOTAL 311.00 Imm PREPAID 182.50 18A 01-2040-0000 4/30/90 430/90 182.50 J K-CD 1010 182.50 30455 4/19/90 VA OMIT Am YOM TOTAL 182.50 M3401 PREPAID 288.00 DEF COMP 4/14 PR 01-2040 -0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 288.00 J W-CD 1010 268.00 30447 4/19/90 0 NETIRQENT STSTEM VENDUR TOTAL 288.00 NXIO PRE-NID 3x.00 win 1ANtW -ROT 01-4140 -4120 4/30/90 4/30/90 35.00 JRNL -CD 1010 35.00 30429 4/17/90 0 SATtV CMKIL YOM TOTAL 35.00 NMS20 NNE -PAID 486.62 P0STr; -*lG ETTER 01- 4020 -3210 • 4/30/90 4/30/90 486.62 JRMB. -CD 1010 486.62 30427 4/16/90 PRE -011) 62.98 POSTG-VTR BILLS 73-7300-3210 62.99 POSTG -MTR BILLS 78- 7800 -3210 4/30/90 4/30/90 125.07 JRNL -CD 1010 125.97 30457 4/20/90 PRE -PAID 13.10 REPLEN POSTG METER 01- 4070 -3210 83.40 REPLEN FM METER 01-4020-3210 20.10 REPLEN PM% METER 01-4040-3210 1.65 REPLEN P05TG METER 01-4060-3210 55.20 iEPLE1M POSTG METER 01- 4090 -3210 6.75 NOW POSTG METER 22- 4170-3210 7.85 REPLEN POSTG METER 71-7100-3210 23.10 REPLEN POSTG METER 01- 4340 -3210 90.95 REPLEN POSTG METER 81- 4350 -3210 %.95 MEPLEII POSTG METER 01-4190-31 45.25 WLEN POSTG METER 73- 7300-3210 45.25 AMEN POSTG METER 78- 7800-3210 56.85 REPLEN POSTG OEM 01-4140-3210 1.15 REPLEN P05TG ME MR 01- 4280 -3210 .25 REPLEN POSTG METER 01 -4270 -3210 11.70 REPLEN POSTG PETER 01- 4000 -3210 32.50 REPLEN POSTG METER 01-4320 -3210 1/30/90 4/30/90 600.00 J K -CD 1010 600.00 30460 4/23/00 MOIM POSTMASTER VEW TOTAL 1212.59 46 31 PRE -PAID 57.58 MBL-LTD 01-2040-0000 1310 PACE 5 0-02 -01 P' ' 4ASE JOURNAL wx Ate �� ;. Lr an TIRE 16.12.!1 VENDOR INVOICE ME NOLD PRE -Mil d1�o11 NO. INVOICE M DATE DATE STATUS pQ11T DESCRIPi AC UNT on RIBIBfT Gil S %%R 4/30190 4/30190 577.38 ,/111 -CD 1010 377.38 30/56 4/19/90 MUTUAL INWIT LIFE VENOM TOTAL 577.58 I" PIE-PAID 6,487.14 PERA 4/14 PR 01.2040 -0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 6,487.14 JbL -0 1010 6491.14 30143 4/19/90 P E R A VENDOR! TOTAL 6487.14 P403D PRE -PAID 7,666.92 MT HOSP 01- 2040-0000 299.30 MT Imo- RETIREE 01-4140 -1310 4/30190 4/30190 7,966.42 JBL -CD 1010 7966.42 30151 4/19/FO PHYSICIANS OF ON VEN10 TOTAL 7966.42 04171 PRE -PAID 4,855.45 LID 71- 7100-9510 120.20 NINE 71- 7100.9520 98.32- DISC 71- 7100.9560 4/30/90 4/30/90 4,871.33 JRIL-CD 1010 4871.33 J0439 4/17/90 PIE -PAID 646.48 LID 71- 7100 -9510 130.75 NINE 71- 7100.9520 14.45- DISC 71- 7100.9560 4/301" 4/30/90 782.78 J8L-CD 1010 782.78 30165 4/24/90 DWLITT NINE 6 SPIRITS VENOM TOTAL 5660.11 54511 PREPAID 508.92 CR UNION 4/14 PR 01-2010-0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 308.92 JAIL-CD 1010 508.92 30130 4/19/90 • STATE CAPITA. CREDIT UNION VENDOR TOTAL 308.92 54550 FIE -PAID 240.21 1ST OTR MONDE 01-2222-0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 140.21 JK -CD 1010 240.21 30426 4 /16/10 STATE TREASURER VENOM TOTAL 240.21 516M PIE -PAID 10.04 FEE,MR MINE 01- 4010-2210 13.84 FEB,MR GASOLINE 01-4190.2210 49.15 FEB,MR MINE 01- 4290-2210 36.91 FEB,MR MINE 01-4340-2210 620.00 FEB,MR MINE 01 -4280 -2210 364.88 FEB,IYW MINE 73- 7300 -2210 114.24 FEB,MR f/I6QINE 78- 78*2210 906.62 FEB,MR MINE 01- 4140-2210 4!30/90 4/30/90 2,115.68 JBL -CD 1010 2113.8 30182 40/90 SUPERA1ERICA VENDOR TOTAL 4^115.68 7 4790 PREPAID 34.34 BOLTS,LATCIES 01-4290 -2310 101.25 SENSOR 01-4290 -2310 4/30/90 4/30190 135.59 JW -CD 1010 135.59 30467 4/24/90 TIW BROS CIEVROLET VENDOR TOTAL 135.59 16046 PIE -PAID 110.00 STATE FIRE SDI- SAVAGE 22- 4170 -4110 1311 MOE 6 PURCHASE JOURNAL OR 4131/0 AP-002 -01 CITY OF POUND Tog 16.12.9 YEMIIOR INVOICE ME HOLD PRE -PAID amt ND. INVOICE NMIR DATE DATE STATUS AMEMAIT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUml1 MOMMY CHECK I DAZE 0 4/30/90 430190 110.00 JRNL-CD 1010 110.00 30471 4/24/90 PlCNAEL SAVME Yowl TOTAL 110.00 I60N PREPAID 110.00 STATE FIRE SCHL-T PALM 22. 4170.4110 4/30/90 4/30/90 110.00 JIK-CO 1010 110.00 30476 4/24/90 TIN PALM YBIMDR TOTAL 110.00 11031 PREPAID 110.00 STATE FIRE SC L-DOYO 22- 4170 -4110 4/30/90 4/30/90 110.00 JRIL -CD 1010 110.00 30472 4/24/}0 mm DOYD YEM8101 TOTAL 110.00 26043 PIE -PAID 110.00 STATE FIRE 813L- ERICKSAI 22- 4170.4110 4/30/90 4/30/0 110.00 M-m 1010 110.00 30473 4/24/0 STEVE EAICRSON YBBMDR TOTAL 110.00 2601 PRE -PAID 110.00 STATE FIRE SCIL -R PALM 22-4170.4110 4/30/90 4/30/90 110.10 JRIL -CD 1010 110.00 30474 4/24/90 11108E< PAIN Ww TOTAL 110.00 26013 PRE -MID 110.00 STATE FIRE SCHL -FIS( 22- 4170-4110 4/30190 4/30/90 110.00 JRNL-CO 1010 110.00 30477 4/24/90 Fig( VBOQt fOTAI 110.00 PIE -PAID 135.00 DOCK REFU D-KARY LA 81- 3260 -0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 135.00 JRNL-CO 1010 135.00 30478 4124190 KATHY KNNALA YBOO1 TOTAL 135.00 26080 WMID 135.00 Do 1uv&JAMES 81- 3260.0100 15.00 DOCK REFUND-JAMES 81- 3200.0000 4/30/90 4/30/90 150.00 JRNL -0 1010 130.00 30479 4114/90 CMISTY JAMES YB1101 TOTAL 130.00 16116 PRE -PAID 110.00 STATE FIRE SCIL -OhAu1 22-4170-4110 4/39/90 4/30/90 10.00 JRIL -CD 1010 110.00 30475 4124/90 KEVIN ORADY Yom TOTAL 110.00 16128 PRE -PAID 68.00 LAC COIF HMM OMIT 01- 4020.4110 4/30/90 4130/90 68.00 JRIL-M 1010 68.00 30484 4/25/90 LNC HOUSING RMAU YE1m TOTAL 68.00 TOTAL ILL YMJm 72, 217.18 oo y3 l31ox PAR 1 PURCNA5E JOURNAL DATE S/04/90 0.002.01 CITY OF MM TINE 9.36.27 YM IMIOICE ME HOLD PIE -PAID Clon N. IMOICE m DATE DATE STATUS MOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUNDFR am CRfa N DATE AM 40.77 APR OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4040-2100 40.77 APR OFFICE SIMIES 01 -4090 -2100 80.87 APR OFFICE SUPPLIES 01- 4140 -2100 0.68 APR OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4190 -2100 40.76 APR OFFICE SUPPLIES 01- 4340 -2100 20.38 APR OFFICE APPLIES 01. 4280.2100 20.38 APR OFFICE SUPPLIES 71- 7100 -2100 ?0.38 APR OFFICE 10PLIES 73- 7390 -2100 20.30 APR OFFICE SUPPLIES 78-7900-2100 5/04 5/04/90 333.37 AL-CD 1010 ACR" Yom TOTAL 333.37 AM 300.25 TIF 1010 FEE 54- 5600-6120 5/04/90 5/04/90 300.25 AL-0 1010 MICAII NATIONAL INN( Em TOTAL 300.25 Am 650.00 SPRING NEWSLETTER 01- 4020-3100 5/04/90 5/04/90 650.00 AL-0 1010 a R mm VE mal TOTAL 630.00 am 87.37 TISIOF,TOIELS 01. 4040.2200 87.37 TISIIE,TOIELS 01- 4090-2200 87.37 TI99 E,TQE18 01-4140-2200 8).37 TISSUE,TOIELS 01-4190.2200 87.37 TISB E,TO ELS 01- 4340-2200 43.68 TISBUE,TOIEIS 01-4280-2200 43.69 TISSUE JO ELS 71. 7100.2200 43.60 TISS E,TQELS 73-7300 -2200 43.68 TISSUEJO ELS 78 -7800 -2200 5/04/90 5/04190 611.38 JK -CD 1010 MWE PAPER! co VENDOR TOTAL 611.58 18700 1,030.00 REPAIR CELEBRITY 22- 4170-3820 5/04/90 5/04190 1,030.00 AIL-0 1010 IA1LETi AUTONOTI{E VENDOR TOTAL 1030.00 10110 10.15 SCR00. E¢P -ROY 01-4140 -4110 5/04/90 5/04/90 10.15 JBL -CD 1010 MOAD RROY VENDOR TOTAL 10.15 CP20 12.57 HATER BILL-LIO 71 -7100 -3740 5104/90 5/04/90 12.57 JRNL -CD 1010 CITY OF ROUND VENDOR TOTAL 12.57 COW 33.68 APR RUG RENT 01- 4320 -4210 35.64 APR RUG RENT 71- 7 100-14-10 5/04/90 5/04/90 71.32 JOL -CD 1010 00 5/y CLEAN SFEP RENTAL IMM TOTAL 71.32 0 l r� u • 1313 131 y FIDE 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL ow $004/90 AP-0O2 -01 CITY OF PDX TM 9.36.x1 VEIN INVOICE NE HOLD PIE -PAID 011 NO. INVOICE NNTrt DATE DATE STATUS Mar OWIPTION ACCOBtT WIDER MW DIM 0 DATE 1 309.62 APR Mil 71. 7100-9540 504,190 5/04/90 309.62 JRNL -CD 1010 COCA COLA OOITLI"IOEST 1A W TOTAL 309.62 009 1,200.00 USED 945 TI-PC 01-4095-5000 5/04190 5/04/90 1,200.00 AL-CD 1010 COM UTOMICE INC VENDOR TOTAL 1200.00 C1020 216.36 REPAIR MICROFILM PRDCEt 01-4020-2100 5 /04190 5/04/90 216.36 J K-CD 1010 COEQT MICROFILM VM TOTAL 216.36 01071 !36.00 REPLACE PHONE 01-4140-MO 5/04/!0 5/04/90 136.00 JBL-CD 1010 CO TIIENTAL TELOM W* MW TOTAL 131.00 C1100 13.00 COPIER MIT 73- 7300 -3150 5104/90 5/04/90 13.00 JAIL-CO 1010 COPT OA.ICATINO PMTS MW TOTAL 13.00 C1107 05.72 CW-M N 01. 4140.4110 5/04/90 5/04/90 CIS 05. J k -0 1010 CQwuETCE Com Vow TOTAL 05.72 01190 1,113.00 OUTSIDE WAIN 73- 7300.2300 121.22 - CREDIT -LIDS 73- 7300-2300 5/04/90 5/04/90 T4.71 J0L-CO 1010 WO HATER EMUIPNENi YBM TOTAL 991.71 01200 4,310.54 APR BEER 71- 7100 -9530 5/04190 5/04/90 4,360.54 ALL-CO 1010 LMT DISTRIIIUTING CO vERRRRat TOTAL 4360.54 01320 417.00 APR CHIEF SALARY 22- 4170 -1370 5/04/90 5/04/90 417.00 J0L -CD 1010 ou IRYCE VENDOR TOTAL 417.00 01360 3,743.00 ASPHALT REPAIR -CO IS,CORNEPCE 73- 7300 -4200 5/04/90 5 /04/40 3,793.00 JR L-C9 1010 RMWE ASPHALT COMPANY VMM TOTAL 3793.00 E1420 5,974.00 APR BEER 71- 7100 -x530 5/04190 5!04/90 5,014.00 JR11. -CD 1010 �T SIDE BEMAGE MM TOTAL 5074.00 131 y 3 PURCHASE JOURNA:r W CITY OF HOMO TM MIX ow INVOICE DIE HOLD P E-NMIO on 181. IMFOIM m BATE OATS STATUS am DESCRIPTION AMMM OVER ARM OW 1 Wf 11430 35.20 APR RTON 01. 4040-4120 5/04190 5/01/90 35.20 JK -CD 1010 E11M18 INME VBWf TOTAL 35.20 We 118.00 FUI C (MINT CNN 4.8/90 01. 1920.3800 5/04/90 5101/90 118.00 JlK-CD 1010 EOIINENIT SiR'lY INC VENDOR TOTAL 118.00 FIS30 180.79 FLUORIDE 73- ?300.1240 5/01/90 5/04/90 180.79 IAL-M 1010 FFo RITE co i 1O.B WAR TOTAL 180.79 FM 165.00 10111010 CLEAN-C HALL 01-4320.1100 S/04/90 5/04190 165.00 WK-CO 1010 FINAL no OUI VICER, INC w= TOTAL 165.00 FM 411.00 SEMI ANN SECURITY-.I0 71- 7100.3!80 5/04/90 5101/!0 411.00 JK-CO 1010 RURD SECURITY VT13WR TOTAL 411.00 F1690 12.80 All RISC 71- 7100.900 5/01/90 5/01/90 FOUR STAN DAR 91 KY 22.80 JFK-CD 1010 VEW TOTAL 22.80 F1710 10.00 TIRE ROUT SEMINAR EIP O1- 4010-4120 5/04/90 5/04/90 10.00 JIL-CO 1010 FFRRNCBE CLARK em TOTAL 10.00 F1726 25.00 RE1!- F1E90NTO FOUprta 01. 4340-4130 5104/90 5/01/90 26.00 JML-CD l010 FRE ATER FOOOATION VM TOTAL 25.00 61761 1,100.00 OEOTEC4 EIPLOATIOI 30- 6000-3100 5/01/90 5/01/90 1,100.00 AL-0 1010 ME CO MLTANTS INC V41WR TOTAL 1100.00 01800 316.36 WAIFS -415 01- 4200 -4200 5/01/90 5/04/90 376.36 J lL-CD 1010 OARY'S DIESEL SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 376.36 O1820 116.58 MAY RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 01- 4280-3950 56.28 RAT RADIO SERVILE CONTRACT 01-4340.39% 12.06 MY RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 01- 4190.3950 12.06 MAY RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 01-4290 -3950 76.36 RAT RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 01-4140.3950 • 1315 MR 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 5/04/0 N -002 -01 CITY OF MOMS TILE 1.26.21 1RIIS01 INVOICE ME HDLD P E-mill am iS. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATO MM MUIPTIMI XMINT MI 0 AYAMT am I DATE 12.06 MAT RADIO SERVIG CMITRIICT 01- 4040-3150 60.30 MAY RADIO SERVICE COPMKT 73- 7300-3450 28.14 MAY MDIO SERVICE CMIINACT 78.7800.3wA 28.14 MAY RADIO SERVICE COMTRCT 22- 4170 -M 43.00 CMIECTdt 01- 4340.3100 5/01/90 5/04/10 445.00 JAIL -0 1010 Sii1Elfall CO MICATIOIS VE1w TOTAL 445.00 SION 230.33 APR NARIMLL SALARY 22. 4170.1370 5/01/10 5/04/10 230.30 AL-0 1010 MOM WVM TOTAL 230.33 aim 39.61 Low MBHICtE SIO1S 01- 43102300 39.62 UM MW VR0HIRIE SIM 01- 4280.2360 5/01/90 5/01/10 71.23 AL-0 1010 w 51 1 CORTwa VBSOR MAL 71.23 am 260.00 00 EVC L-LORpI 01-4140.4110 5/04/10 5114/90 260.06 JAIL -0 1010 ON Toms sEMES vENIDR TOTAL 260.00 NM60 60.40 CHISEL 01- 4280 -2310 60.40 CHISEL 73- 7300.2300 srolno srolno 120.10 J8L-0 1010 tm TOTAL 120.50 N 44.80 MITCI FOR IT TW 01- 4310-2300 5/01/10 5101/10 61.00 JAIL -0 1010 NM N oII E SHO TOTAL 49.0 IM20 16.65 an TAI 01- 4320.4100 5/04/10 5/01/90 16.65 JIM. -0 1010 M CO MPT OF 1WMII T VON' TOTAL 16.65 12140 1,132.10 DA Cmnm -1t71 112 22- 4170.3900 212.11 1130 MIND FEE 01.4110.42% 5/04/90 5/04/10 2,144.71 JlK-CD 1010 MM CO SHERIFFS DEPT VENDOR TOTAL 2144.78 12350 200.00 IAFC REGISTRATION 22- 4170-4110 5/04/90 5/04/10 200.00 JK -CD 1010 POWATL ATSM FIRE CHIEFS VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 J2520 40.40 SAFETY VESTS 01- 4210-2200 40.40 SAFETY VESTS 78. 7800-2200 40.41 SAFETY VESTS 73- 7300 -2200 . 5/04190 5/04/90 121.21 JAL -CO 1010 1314 PAGE S PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE S/04/90 N -002 -01 CITY OF IOlO TIRE 9.26.27 YE1Q1 INVOICE DIE Wou PRE -PAID CHECK b. WGICE MAR DATE DATE STATUS AROUNT, DESCRIPTION ACCOW MURDER AMOUNT CIECI( t DATE JlN WATCH SALES Co VENDOR TO';AL 121.21 J2333 1 PIA IINSP 01 -4190 -3100 5/04/90 5/04/90 1,060.50 AL -CD 1010 in NEITHER TOTAL 1060.50 12% 23.10 APR RISC 71- 7100 -9550 5/04/90 5/04/90 23.50 JRRL -0 1010 JON mm VENNOR TOTAL 23.50 J2570 14.13 ENT EV-RDQNLET 01- 4140-4110 5/04190 5/04/90 14.13 JAML-CA 1010 JON MO(OW YENDOI TOTAL 14.13 Km 920.00 DAB A NALK-NILLIMS STORE 73- 7300 -4200 5/04/90 5/01/90 920.00 JILL -0 1010 KNNA VM70OI TOTAL 920.00 Km 60.30 ROEA N.ADES 01.4340 -2310 5/04/ 5/04/90 60.30 JRML -0 1010 No CO. YERNpt TOTAL 60.30 L2TN 50.00 COP NORTH COF 01-4040-4110 5/04/90 5/04/90 50.00 JRR-0 1010 Lw. RELATIONS AMIATES VEIN TOTAL 50.00 L2752 113.21 APR GA60.INE -FIRE 22- 4170 -2210 5/04/90 5/04/90 113.21 JVt -CD 1010 LOTT'S WRING PAIN( STIR Vow TOTAL 113.21 1.2140 123.25 ROTARY DIES & RTGS- HARRELL 01- 4140-4120 5/04/90 5/04/90 123.25 J K -CD 1010 LEOTARD NNIRL VENDOR TOTAL 123.25 1.2910 570.00 TREE TRIMMING 81- 4330 -5110 300.00 TREE TRIMMING 01 -4320 -4200 50.00 TREE TRIRRIN'i 01 4340 5 i O4/90 3104/00 920.00 JAM. -CD 1n10 LUTZ TREE SERVICE YEW TOTAL 9 ,N1.00 83030 5,762.00 APR BEER 71-7100 - 0 3.'x) 5/04190 5/04/90 5,762.00 JRRL -CD 1010 RAW V11 DISTRIBUTOR VENDOR TOTAL 576:.00 43151 r.2'. 30 REPAIR GARAGE DOORS -IP 01 -4 140•:3130 • r1 �J • 13l? PALE 6 PURCNAIE JOURNAL 041E wo/90 AP-0O2 -01 CITY OF MAID TILE 9.26.27 VEMOR INVOICE 21 HOLD PRE -MID am NO. INVOICE OF DATE DATE STATUS MM DESCRIPTION VCOMT WIER ARM DWI DATE is 5/04/90 5104/90 322.30 JRK -CD 1010 PM GARAGE DOOR CO VENIIaW TOTAL 322.30 43170 31,856.39 MT MIEN SERVICES 79-7800.4230 9,476.51- NAT SO SERVICES 78-1190 -0000 477.18- MT SEWER SERVICES 78- 3812-0000 5/04/90 5/04190 21,902.40 AL-M 1010 WM- WASTE CONTROL COATI• YOM TOTAL 21002.40 N=7 133.4 IIMTS,NUTS,CMINET 01-4340 -2300 5/04/90 5/04/90 133.08 AL-M 1010 NIKST BOLT i SUMLY VDM TOTAL 133.08 43;40 29.98 PAVER RENTAL -MY 01- 4140 -39% 5/04/90 5/04/90 29.98 JK-O 1010 NINA Com YOM TOTAL 29.98 NMI 22.34 All CELLULAR TELE 01-4140-3210 6.54 APR CELLULAR TELE 73. 7300.3220 5.10 APR CELLULAR TELE 22- 4170 -3220 5/04/90 5/04/90 34.18 JK-C8 1010 NA Mum TELEPHONE CO YOM TOTAL 34.18 37.50 BELTS FOR SAIL 22- 4170 -ZO 5/04/90 5/04/90 37.50 JRK-CD 1010 NN CONWAY FIRE i SAFETY YOM TOTAL 37.50 43170 44.00 MATER TESTS 73- 7300 -3100 5/04190 5 /04/00 44.00 Jlr<-CD 1018 0 VALLEY TESTING LABEL M MM TOTAL 44.00 K%490 5,939.75 All SALARIES 22- 4170 -1390 1 APR MINT 22- 4170 -3190 655.50 APR DRILLS 22- 4170.1300 501.00 BL JMI-MR MINT 22- 4170 -3110 5/04/90 5/04/90 8,263.23 Jiff. -CD 1010 CA FIRE OEPARTNENT YEW TOTAL 8263.25 om 5,359.00 MY FIRE RELIEF PENSION 95 -9300 -1400 5 /04/90 5 /041 5,359.00 Jul. -CD 1010 SM FIRE RELIEF ASSN VENDOF ',OTAL 5359.00 IC3599 24.60 COIL FOR 117 22- 4170-2200 5104/90 5/04/90 24.60 Jiff -CD 1010 MA BOAT WORVS VFIIDat TOTAL 24,60 • 1318 PAGE 7 PURCHASE JOURNAL DAh 5/04/90 AP- C42-01 CITY OF KA1O TIME 9.26.27 vow IWAICE ME HOLD PIE -PAID CHECK NO, INVOICE M DATE DATE STATUS NOM DESCRIPTION ACCOIITT NU R ATOMT CHECK t DATE 13740 24.72 DELINEATORS 01-4280 -2360 5104/90 5/04/90 24.72 JRNL -CD 1010 NEIM Sim VENOM TOTAL 24.72 M3770 83.00 PETER 73- 7300 -2300 5104190 5/04/90 83.00 J K -CD 1010 NORTH STAR NATERIORKS PRO# VEND TOTAL 83,00 103790 52.10 COIL 2INC,CHAIN BINDERS 01-4280 -2300 34.56 GAS CANS,BOAT LITE KIT 01-4340 -2200 5/04/90 5/04/90 86.66 AL-CO 1010 NORTHERN HYO ftICS VENDOR TOTAL 86.66 mm 5.17 NSP FINAL-LESLIE RD 01-4340-3710 5104/90 5/04/90 5.17 J OL -CD 1010 10THFAN STATES POIER CO VENOM TOTAL 5.17 N3802 5,027.06 APR L10HT1NG 01-4280-3110 5/04/90 5 /04/90 5,027,06 AL-CO 1010 NORTHERN STATES POO VOW TOT(& 5027.08 O3880 400.00 BR00N6- SLEEPER 01-4280 -2310 5104M 5/04/90 400,00 AL-CD 1010 OLD DOMINION BtAHR CO VENOM TOTAL 400.00 P3960 98.24 PLOW NOSE 01- 4290-2310 5/04/90 5/04/90 98.24 AL-0 1010 PAPER CAL1ENSON 6 CO VENDOR TOTAL 98.24 P4000 172.56 APR Mil 71-7100-9540 5/04/90 5/04/90 172.56 JRL-CO 1410 PEPSI-COLA CO PANY VENOM TOTAL 1x.56 P4060 2,150.35 APR BEER 71-7100-9 5/04/90 5/04/90 2,150.35 AL-CD 1010 POOREDA DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL 2150.35 P4106 5,610.00 CONCRETE FEPAIR -CO 15 73 -7300 -4200 5/04/'10 5/04,90 5,610.00 JOWL 1010 PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS, 1 VENDOR TOTAL 5610.!ci P4119 ;,270.50 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 16-5887 -3100 W.00 ECONOMIC OEVELOP4W 01-4399.4100 .,/64190 5/04/ 4,070.%0 J;I& -CD 1010 PUBLIC FINANCIAL SYSTEMS VENfff TOTAL 44 • • • 1311 POK 8 PURCHASE JOURNAL AF- 002-01 CITY Of FM VENDOR INVOICE ME HOLD NO. INVOICE NNNI DATE DATE STATUS MOUNT DESCRIPTION 184.17 APR OAINGE 5 /04/90 5/04,10 184.17 JHHL - CD RA1fiY'S SANITATION VENW TOTAL 184.17 44270 165.15 IACP CONF-BOSTROI 5/04/90 5/04/90 165.15 JK-CO IbMLD 80S1TQl YOM TOTAL 165.15 44280 200.00 APR ASST CHIEF SALARY 5/04/90 5104/90 200.00 ,AL-CO NOW Mom YENOOR TOTAL 200.00 44290 174.69 NO ICE 5/04/90 5/04/90 174.69 Jl<-CO owls ICE CQiANT VENDOR TOTAL 174.69 44300 157.25 ROTARY -94JU 5/04190 5/04/90 157.25 J1K -CD ROTARY CLUI OF NDUND VErD01 TOTAL 157.25 54970 112.05 6 -8 H09'-STUT" 112.80 6 -8 HOBP - NAL 7.00 6-8 HD9P-8AL- KTWM157< 5/04/90 5/04/90 232.70 AL-CD 9404E YOM TOTAL 232.70 S40 9^1.20 PRINT NEWSLETTER 5/(4/90 5/04/90 921.20 J8L-CD 903 PRINTING Yew TOTAL 921.20 S4440 3.50 APR Cpl WAKS 7.00 APR CAR WASHES 87.50 APR CAR W KS 5/04/90 5/04/90 98.00 JOL-0 SPRING PARK CAR WASH VENDOR TOTAL 98.00 54498 420.00 EIPL WANTED ADS 5104190 5/04/90 420.00 JI01L-CD STAR TRIM VENDOR TOTAL 420.00 S44" 412.80 REPAIR 3/4 T TRK 5/04/90 5/04/90 412.80 JtNL -CD STAR-WEST CHEV/ PS VENDOR TOTAL 412.80 X 70 30.23 LIGHTS lIIE -PA prpc ACCOUNT ww ATaMT d�OI 1 01. 4320 -3750 1010 01- 4140 -4110 1010 22-4170-1370 1010 71- 7100.9310 1010 01- 1010-4130 1010 01- 41wi 01- 1010-1510 01- 4210.1510 1010 01- 4020.3500 1010 OI-4010-3110 01- 4210 -MO 01- 4140-3e10 1010 01-4190-4100 1010 01-4340 -3810 1010 01-4320 -22M /3.to E W- ►UICNASE JOURNAL on SAM CITY OF NM IN wmCE RE OIL" W. -mll ORK ML WMM 1411 all STAIN NW KUPTIM MONT "m mm on I m 3m/90 51"flo 30.23 JlK-CD 1010 $IMC ILECIRIC CO %M TOTAL 30.23 sm 321.01 UGt7�1 NINE- MILLING 73-7jW4200 MY" SAM190 Mot AL .0 loto 14M aim CO VeGa1 TOTAL Wol 0619 300.00 NOTE No 30.60*4100 3m/90 0 104/90 Mw JINL-Cl 1010 IM NILL liff Fw VBEEt TM W." wu to& Iw NEU 0i-QW1300 Woll" SMI" 102.0 AL-Cl tolo SWIMS I a MR MAL 142.40 WO It "M 71- 7100.1!130 31" smin IIAXAL AL-Cl 10" cl GMa 10fAL Im".6 22.10 WMFM.Yl= 73-7300-2200 SM/90 SAY" 22.10 JAIL-Cl 1910 ILL Mal tm TWIL 22." am 225.00 INSTALL W-M 01. 43*M 3/04/10 WOO 275.00 JM-Cl 1010 WAMMIN OWN TOTAL 225.00 14" 70.61 NMI pff 78-791W3800 OWN Imis 70.61 AL-Cl loto wa Fur & cm "M I OW TOTAL 769.61 T40 30.31 AN Nil 71-7100-9510 3m/9c 5/04/90 30.36 -WL-CD *Soto w Cm NK Am of YM TOTAL 30.36 VfNO 230.0 MWO RAHM 16-58"-3100 845.00 w MA 01. 41W3100 162.50 U KAV-CATALYF EMU ol-rico-M 5/04M 5104M 1.245.63 Pt-M 1510 Vallwa-PAZAWSTALLIOM Ww TOTAL 1245.63 727.95 PMT WZ 01-4340-nM 5104/90 5/04/52, 727.95 Jthj-CD 10!0 WIND 1169MATIOMAL FM MM TOTAL 727.9.' pa 10 PURCNASE JOURNAL us I/" 4 -01 CITT OF NOUMD TIME 9.36.27 vm [MICE DIE HOLD PIE -PAID am NI. Iftlu NINR DATE DATE STAPA ANDUNT KOIPTION ACLO1111 NUI o ANDUNT CNII:K 1 WE op 14:.53 FILTER,k"IR KITS 22- 4170 -2100 5/O4/90 5/04/ 0 141.53 Pub O 1010 Ialm WANT YEINOR TOTAL 147.53 ww 13.% MM 41 73. 7300 -22W 1.93 NDA1 22- 4170 -2200 06.77 um UP DAY MAST Ot- 4320.2200 39.92 MEN UP DAY 91IPPlIES 01 -4320 -2200 23.76 DJFS 01 -4020 -2200 1/04/10 5/04/90 171.% JOL-0 1010 NI3 W FM YDt4'OR TOTAL 171.% N5630 432.00 6037 EIAJMEE81 79- 7300.3100 5/04/90 5104/!0 432.00 JILL-CD 1010 11Mt Be VENDOR TOTAL 432.00 NOW 151.44 RE9FRYE UNtF0e6 01-2300.0220 5/114/!0 5/04/10 451.44 JK-CD 1010 l LINK OTORE ANC YENNOR TOTAL 451.44 tlelro 1.550.00 NAT RETAIIEO 01. 4110.3100 2 NARI31 P OBUTION 01 -4 -3120 1,915.00 AP1;IL HO CUTIO4 Ot- 4110-3120 qu-NNSON-LAR91IN 5/04110 5/04/10 5,710.00 JIL-m 10': Yom TOTAL 5710.00 15750 53.00 PRIM -1012 01- 4320.5000 3.77 INT 1012 01. 4320-6110 5104/10 1/04/90 56.77 JOL-M 1010 161011 CDFWTION VENDOR TOTAL 56.77 15150 63.30 IMN,NIINOAS 01- 42!0-2250 26.70 IINiEN.SM 01- 4290.2300 5/04/10 5/04/10 90.00 .IML-CD 1010 '= pC YNOR TOTAL 90.00 16051 52.50 DOCK R&UN-NNARE 81- 3260 -M 5/04/90 5/04/90 52.50 AL-CD 1010 DAVID ODTD VENDOR TOTAL 51.% 16070 100.00 APR ASST NARNi1A 1 22-4170 -1370 5/04/90 5/04/90 100.00 JK-CD 1010 410*1 PALM YEIm TOTAL !00.00 16011 135.00 DOCK RENN -NOTE AVAIL 81- 3260-0000 15.00 DOCK REFUND -N01E AVAIL 81-3240-0000 • 5!04!90 `104190 150.00 JK-CD 1010 /3:tz /� 11 ►URCMA JOURNAL DAIS 31'01/10 All -092 - 01 CITY OF Ap10 TI1E 1.2/9.21 Ym INVOICE ME MOLD PRE-MID ow NO. INVOICE NNM DATE DATE STATUS NW mwIiTION ACCOUNT NUMER NQNT DECK 8 DATE CINDY L M ITN VENDOR TOTAL 150.00 16012 135.00 00 FOUND-Of AVAIL 81- 3260 -0000 20.00 DOCK AEFUA W AVAIL 81- 3200-0000 5/01/90 3/04190 133.00 JAL -131 1010 TAMP PM VDADOR TOTAL 135.00 16083 41.25 DOCK REFIAD-9MAE 61-3260-0000 3/04110 3/04/90 47.23 JK-CD 1010 KEITH LIORIS1 MM TOTAL 47.23 160a 32.25 DOCK REFUND-SAME 81- 3260 -M 3/04/90 5/04/90 32.23 JK-0 1010 LM LENT YM TOTAL 32.23 16085 $3.50 DOCK WUNO-sm 81- 3260 -MOO 3/'01/!0 3/04/90 33.90 JNL-0 1010 T,pM IMIN9KI YM TOTAL 53.30 16016 42.50 DOCK MRk aW 81 X60 3/04/90 3 /04/90 42.30 JW -CO 1010 MICHAEL FOl VENDOR TOTAL 42.50 16081 52.50 DOCK AEFUD-90A1E 81 -3260 -0000 5/04/90 5/04/50 $2.30 JIL-CD 1010 RICIM IOYD VEMD011 TOTAL 32.50 16018 113.00 DOCK IEFUD -WT IlFJW 81- 3260 -0000 3/04/90 3/04/90 113.00 JOL-0 1010 IELORE6 1ELM VEIDOR TOTAL 113.00 16019 30.00 MCK REFUD-9MRE FEE 81- 3260 -4000 5/04/10 3/04/90 30.00 JML -CD 1010 .AY an= VENDOR TOTAL 30.00 16000 52.23 DOCK REFUND-9MRE 81- 3260 -OOM 5/04/90 $/04/90 $2.23 At-CD 1010 KEVIN Wow! VENDOR TOTAL 52.75 26091 67.75 DOCK TEFW-9MTE 81.3260 -0000 3/04/90 3/04/90 62.25 AL-0 1010 AOKRT JAWS VENDOR TOTAL 67. 1w 135.00 DOCK WW AVAIL 81-3260-0000 A 10.00 DOCK RUM -NONE AVAIL 81-3:00 -4000 131.3 D Q- oN McUnts Frank Roos Associates, Inc. $5050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Te"hrxw Engineers 612 /476-0010 Planners 6121476 -8532 FAX Surveyors May 7 . 1990 Nr. Edward J. ShukTe, Jr., City Manager City of Nound 5341 Naywood Road Nound, Ninnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City Hall Addition & Remodeling NFRA #8878 Dear Ed: Enclosed is Shingobee's Payment Request No. 1 for work completed through April 27. 1990, on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $27,423.21. We have reviewed this request. find that it is in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. • If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact FAM Sincerely, NcCOMB FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC. Steven W. Jantze . P�E'E., SJ:aju An Equal Jp(XSrtur,ty Emphyui IIFLICATI01 All CIIIIIICAII 101 FAIIIII 101 CITY 01 Hill 11011 111160111 1110111, lic. i fAli 1 • 5311 min 1011 FIOiICTe 10111 CITY NALL APPLICiTidl 101 I Hill 0 513N m I01 1111111 1111911 101 1/21/1 AltllflCT' I AMITIO11 CONTRACT 1011 11111101 / 1110I9L FINICT 101 1 CWIACIIltlt 1111011 ........................................................................................... ............................... COITRACTOR'i AFFLICTION FOR WORST CIANR 1!111 BINARY ............. .................... ........ AIIifloll lllictloll ....................... TOTAL p1Rfloll 0.0 1.11 .......... ......................... ...... CU1ill R UTH ......... ...... ......................... 011611AL COIIIICI IN 711211.010 311 Of CIANI OINII SM.N CONIIACT IN To Utl 111111.0 TOTAL CHILITil US 110111 1111.23 111111AUt CONFLITRI 1011 Iloilo UtIIII , till HH01 co 0 IITR ........... . . .. 1 111231" SSN.N �TILI .--•••..•. - -.-•.•. Alf tiA16R 0410.410 10 NII11Ilill COITUCNII C IIIIIil THAT TO 1111111 Of III IIOILRICI 1011UTI0 AM NLIIf TN IOII COTIIII IT flit 1PRICATIO1 FOR FAMOf 1111991 t01FLITi1 11 ACCOMA C1 II11 IN COItNA01 NCI - liltl, "At ALL UNITS UFI fill FAIR it III f01 "Al Too IIICI IkPIOU COItIfltAIII 101 FAIIIII 1IRR 111111 All FATNRNTI RICRIIRI fm TN MIR, UI flit Co1RllT FIfult 11011 1111I1 IO 101 111. CNTUCTORl SHINMM BUILDW, INC. off, i � �?'¢d._......... 41 ......... -- AICIITRCT'O Cl1TtflClfl 101 FIYHIT Is secord&sce with the Contract Waste% based 111 01 -site oblervatioms aid the data cowprislwl tit above appliatiol, the Architect certifies to the Oweer that to the best of th Aciitect's ksovledge, imtors&tiol and belief the to ►k bas progce114 11 Wicated, the qulity of the fork is to aecordamce vith the coatract Ooceseets, no the Contractor t1 eltitl!d to paYl!st of the MOIST CR1T11111. TOtAL RU111A6R 1011.12 TOTAL NAINNI Lill UTAIIUI 21123.21 Lill FIRTI01l CSI IIICAIII 1.0 C11111T FATIRIT NR 21123.21 IALUCR # IIIAIIAGI 141163.15 RtAfl Of r Ill cm" Of r Write 111101111 All 81011 10 1111110 1111 27 BY Of Apr. , 159Q K: Rf ......................................................... . AN0111 011111111 ...............1 2a.423,Z (Attack !Iplaeatios if ans&at certified differ# from the &#east applied for.1 AICIl1Rcle This certifilite if ootWfotlakl!. The ANOIIT CIRT11111 is pe /lble oily to the Coetrrctor sawed bertfa. 1111a1ce, pa /lest aid acceptance of Fallen are witboat pr�;idice to any rifkts Of the Ovier or Coitracter ender this Contract. • CMllilAtlN nut UtUCHIll IM Cut111CAU tM MUM PAN I flu# Nirmu HILNU, lit. ittLIMIN Illlus 1 lilt N Not tiolicti Not HIT ULL AttLICAtIN Mtio 38161111 1141 YINN 616 fulls two M1611 NNI 0 11164 MIAMI to, i111t1N I uNNL MI 64121191 Ut 11t/llut'1 NIMI No 1 ......................... .......................................................................... A ! ! 1 1 l ............................... 6 1 ............................... 1 ................................................................................................... 1011 C01114111 N. 11MI11I01 a 6u r� 1,.J "11L UIUIAL MUM Ut ICMUS tull0u till tulant ill I"W 1 ULAKI i N. 11MI11I01 a 6u full U RICItINI fulls BIM H Ull C01t. " RUM A1tUM ................................................................................................... •.............................. 1111 MNItl111lB 14419.0 1.6 14114.61 1.0 14114.63 111 1N#4.31 1411.01 2112 "Nam 11311.66 1.0 1.0 1.11 1.0 1 11111.01 0.0 2238 utA1M11i, UMILL i COIt 14121.66 1.0 1111.61 4.0 4111.61 11 9129.0 4"A 2141 Amite win 23661.66 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4 1310.6 0.01 2611 11= ANr1q 12910.0 4.0 6411.0 1.0 6411.0 1f 6419.0 641.11 2111 mmus uLU 1116.11 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 4 5116.06 4.01 INS Wh114W NKUU 12#41.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 1 13811.04 1.0 U15 t1it1111-Cam" INSCOI 1.06 1.66 4.0 1.6 1 11411.0 4.01 !138 111100" i UK. Iflu 11111.00 /.M 1.0 4.0 1.6 1 11112.6 4.6 661 IIIN 010111 i /11.0 1.0 1.0 CH 1.0 1 04.00 1.0 2 tow MUM 2011.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1 2611.6 I.M W MUM WOMAN; 901.04 1.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 1 90.6 1.6 20 mm inwim 1111111 4110.0 /.0 1.0 4.6 4.0 4 4410.46 1.0 1211 ltolutin 621.6 4.0 1.0 1.6 4.0 1 421.6 4.01 1112 UAM0MUC NOtt10 14169.0 1.0 4.0 4.6 4.0 1 14169.0 1.6 no 21411 NAM 130.0 1.0 1.0 I.M 1.0 1 136.6 1.01 WIS BtML Ism i tum 1110.0 4.0 0.38 1.0 1.01 1 1110.0 Lo 1211 NN NIO 2612.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.414 6 2612.0 4.41 1211 tmm But UK 110.0 4.0 0." 1.0 1.0 1 IIW.M 4.01 11§1 MCIINAL 0111W1 2§11.0 1.0 I.N 1.0 6.0 1 1611.0 1.01 1111 HIM 1AD11M 021.66 1.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1 u21.O 0.0 u6 full i iLUIN 1266.60 1.0 4.10 I.M 1.0 1 1381.0 6.01 SM Bill WU Ito 1/1111 CUM ttu IL/Mi 11111.0 3921.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 CH 1.0 1.0 1.11? /.0 1 1 21111.0 1921.0 0.01 1.0 rill ICIIiUM CllLilil 310.0 0.0 1.10 1.01 IM 4 3164.0 1.6 16H UAIUtlt 11,001 914.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 0.0 1 90.0 1.4 960 CAMIIN 11§12." 4.0 1.0 4.010 1.0 1 1302.00 1.0 990 H11111B 11910.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 I.N 1 1110.0 1.0 IIIN WfU 101141 CO1 UIuIt 1142.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 I.N 1 1112.0 0.0 11211 at" 11LL 1,011116 1661.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1 1M.11 1.0 10111 116M 191.00 /.0 4.11 4.0 1.0 1 191.0 CH 14611 fullfl0I IIICI 1666.11 0.10 1." 4.0 1.0 1 1126.0 4.0 Will 1101161 tltli 1061." 0.01 0." CH 1.11 4 1161.0 4.0 1101 "IL11 i Bill ICCIU. 1111.11 1.11 4.0 1.11 1.0 1 1111.40 1.0 41911 NAHUM L01tI1 MISS 191.0 1.11 1.14 1.0 4." 4 194.11 1.0 11211 111111LIC ILIYUl011 34213.41 0.11 1.41 1.0 4.11 1 31213.0 4.0 r� 1,.J • . 6 tNtIN►tIN NOR 11 PLICHI01 IN CUIIIl! ►ft 10 I►1111f NI! 3 RINI t111i0t11 1111,1111, lK. IIILICAIIN I N& 1 em N NIN II/Nltf s IONI CIII 11LL VILiuflN 11111 *13140 1301 Nino 110 fulm t411t WORM ON N SSIA t01t11Cf Ids 0111101 1 IINIIL lei 06/2110 11t11titf'l flNitt no 1 ................................................................................................... ► 1 c 1 1 1 i ....................•••........ 1 1 ................................................................................................... OUR CWL1fM ..........................•.... ........................ RIM I►1113LL t011L1t11 ul u1111u1 f fill !11311!1,1 in 1ft111 1 ILL►ItI 1 K. N0111101 of rou fall u fLICHION Mill 3t0111 to 1►» toll. h two allow ...........................................................................................•....... ISIII 111! 12IMA 1.0 1.0 I.N 1.0 ............................... 1 IDIOM$ 1.01 11111 ILN111t 21111.0 1.0 1.0 0.11 1.0 1 21111.41 1.01 :1111 1i11111fittlN 11111.11 i.N I.N i.N i.N 1 ItSN.N 1.01 36333 f►{lflitll, 11111.11 0.11 0.11 I.N /.N 1 SN"A 6.41 INN 11WW ► Wit SION.06 4.00 4110.01 0.11 1111.06 f .........................•••••- 11211.0 111.01 ................................................................................................... • 3M IAL . 8161 UL CUfWf 103211.0 1.0 11111.23 1.0 31111.21 1 ............................... 1121101 1111.11 ................................................................................................... cum IIMii� 0 1 tl►ii1 NMI 11 IS"." 6.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 1 SSO$A 1.0 ... .............................................................................................. • t11f011L - OUR 00111 ................................................................................................... 11N.0 6.0 I.N 0.0 0.0 ............................... 1 ............••••••............. SUCH I.N ................................................................................................... • . 01111 WILL - . ................................................................................................... 70111.0 0.0 31110.23 1.0 11111.23 ............................... 1 ......•........................ 1313101 3111.12 • aft �ofl -off 0 Way 2, 1990 To: hound City Council c/o tie . Peggy James !found, MN 55364 From: Hr. and Mrs. Brian R. Johnson 4945 Glen Rlyn Road !found, dN 55364 Dear Sirs... Inclosed, please find copies of Summation, Comments and Recom- mendation by Jan Bertrand dated September 14, 1987 regarding the request for Setback Variance of Existing Structure (Case 87 -663). Also enclosed, is the Council Resolution 87 -179 confirming the pro- posed Variance with no dissenting opinion. It Was assumed that we Would be proceeding with remodeling and construction at the time of the original variance. However, due to weather and financial implications, we were unable to proceed until this spring. Therefore, per conversation with Peggy Jamec, we would like to apply for an extension of the original variance so that we man submit drawings and spucifications for permits at this time. Assuming that the original variance can be extended, we will be proceeding with construction /remodeling per original proposals to Council as quickly as possible. BRJ : br3 Enclosure Thanx You... Sincerely, Brian and Maria Johnson M September 929 t RESOLUTION NO. 87 -179 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ALLOW AN ADDITION FOR PARTS OF LOTS 17 AND 18 BLOCK 24 SHAOYW000 POINT; PID NO. 13-117 -24 11 0094 (4J45 GLEN : ELYN ROAD) P t 2 CASE NO. 87 -663 WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to recognize an existing non - conforming 6 foot front yard setback to allow an addition of 18.2 feet by 52 feet and a 22 by 36 foot 3 stall 1 story garage for part of Lots 17 and 18. Block 24, Shadywood Point; PID No. 13- 117 -24 it 0094; and WHEREAS, the subject property Is located within the R -1 Single Family 26M6 District which according to the City Code, requires a 30 foot front yard setbaA. 10 foot sldayards, and 15 foot rear yard and a minimum dmiling size of W& so)isio, 1 x, fat; and WHEREAS, Section 23.404 Subdivision (8) provides that alterations my be mode too building coptaining a lawful non - conforming residential unit when the alter- ation will improve the livability thereof, but the alteration does not increase the number of units. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: I. That the City dues hereby authorize the existing nonconforming principal structure at 4945 Glen Elyn Road; PID it 13- 117 -24 11 0094. 2. The City Council authorizes the existing structural setback violation acid authorizes the alterations setforth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Sub- division (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, non - conforming use, subject to all the provisions and restric- tions of Section 23.404. =; 3. It is determined that the livability of the residential unit will be improved by authorizing the following alterations to the non - conforming use property: The addition of an 18.2 by 52 foot one story addition to the living space with a 22 by 36 foot 3 stall one story -garage to the existing 18.2 by 28.3 foot one story dwelling as a slab on grade as shown on the site plan identified as Exhibit "A ". Upon the further condition that the existing dwelling be brought to current bui•Iding code, correct the drainage on the site to divert water from the existing and new addition, and removal of the front 4.6 by 6.2 ft. entryway. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Abel and seconded by Mayor Smith. The following Councilmembers voted in the affirmative: Abel, Jensen, Jensen, Johnson and Smith. 0 The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. 7 es►.• City Clerk M yor TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jan Bertrand, Building Official Flaming Commission Agenda of September 14, 1987 CASE NO. 87 -563 APPLICANT: Mr. Brian R. Johnson LOCATION: 4945 Glen Myn Road LEGAL DESC.: Parts of Lots 17 and 18 Shadywood Point all'in block 24; PID 013- 117 -24 11 0094 SU0JFi1T: SETBACK YARIAMM OF EXISTING STRtr.."E EXISTING ZONING: 1-1 single family PROlOSAL: The applicant is proposing to add a 18.2 by 52 foot one story addition to the living space with a 22 by 36 foot three stall one story garage to an existing 18.2 by ?9.3 foot one story dwelling with a slab on- grade. The floor area is 504 sq. ft. the required is 840 sq. ft. minimum. The property was subdivided in July to have a conforming side yard for lots of record of 6 foot and to bring the lot area to within 109 of the required 10,000 sq. ft. in the R -1 zoning district; lot area 9,187 sq. ft. The front yard setback, however, is 6 feet t;'the required setback is 30 feet to the existing structure. CMIENTS: The dwelling is 17 feet from the curb line as the boulevard is 11 feet. The structure is currently valued at$16,200. The applicant has a slab on -grade hams, with a cesspool in the yard which must be filled, a wall heater to heat the borne, etc. The applicant does plan to correct all of the deficiencies In the structure, such as, but not limited to, central heating, correct yard grading, fill cesspool, additional outlets for electrical and bring to current code size water piping to code with waste and venting of plumbing, ,►lobbing accessibility, new water heater, change all windows, etc. RECOMMENDATION: The addition portion of the structure will have conforming setbacks to the property lines for lots of record, the floor area will bring the structure to the minimum floor area. Staff recommends granting the variance upon the condition that corrections be made to the existing dwelling to bring iS into conformance with current building code and correct the drainage on the site.to divert water away from the existing and new addition with removal of the front 4.6 by 6.2 foot entry. The abutting neighbors have been notified. This will be referred to the City Council on September 12, 1987. Rb 46 R () 0 -oAJ May 8, 1990 . RRSOLOTIOW BROCLILXXX W MAY 14 -22 1990 EICYCLE WEE= IW TR! CITY OF MOUND WIRRRAS, bicycling is a healthy, economical, and environmentally beneficial mode of transportation and recreation; and WRERRAS, bicycling is the single most popular outdoor recreational activity in Minnesota; and WIEREAS, warm weather brings out bicyclists of all ages, and also brings the risk of dangerous bicycle accidents; and WIEREAS, the safety and viability of bicycling can be enhanced by adherence to traffic laws, by safe bicycle and motor vehicle driving practices, and by recognition of the needs of bicyclists in the design of the built environment and in education and enforcement programs. WOW, TRWRETORE, SR IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby proclaim May 14 -22, 1990 to be "Bicycle Week in the City of Mound ", and hereby urges is all citizens to take decisive action which will help the bicycle fulfill its potential in contributing to the health, safety, and welfare of Mi.,nesotans. • Date: To be released: April 27, 1990 HIT THE BARS BEFORE BREAKFAST: NATIONAL BIKE TO WORK DAY Contact: Joe Ridge 612- 297.4778 or Matt Welbes 612.625 -5737 Are you frustrated by freeway traffic jams. high fuel costs ad increasing parking capon? Put nn end to all those problem and improve your health by participating in Minnesota's Bike to Work Day. The Minnesota Bike to Work Day committee is encouraging you to warm up your bikes and mot your engines on Tuesday. May 15. 1990 and join in by biking to work ce that day. The goal of Bike to Work Day is two-fold: to get people who don't usually bike to work to try it and to increase awareness that bicycle commuting is a grew mode of tramspoaatios. Minsesota Bike to Work Day is being held is conjunction with National Bike to Work Day. e 'There are many good masons 10 and generally improve your health; pollution sad biking is a low -cost you time in city commuting." said Dustrude. bicycle-- biking can lower blood pressure biking save$ energy and reduces transportation mods that cos actually save Minnesota State Bicycle Coordinator Jim dtatistics released by the Minnesota Department of Transportation show that: - Minnesotans bicycle at almost two times the national average - pedalling over 200 million miles every year. -just by getting to public transit by bicycle instead of car would save each commuter roughly 150 gallons of gasoline each Year- -if 10% of Americans who commute by car switch to bike and ride. more than 1.3 billion could be shaved off of the U.S. Oh import bill. If you are interested in obtaining further information about planning a commuter bike route, bicycic safety issues or registering your bike. contact the Metro Bicycle Program at 612 -625 -5737. For further information os Minnesota Bike to Work Day 1990. please call the Minnesota Department of Transportation at 612. 297 -4778. Minnesota Bike to Work Day is a joint effort of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. the 4 -H Metro Bicycle Program and the Minnesota State Bicycle Advisory Board. • -30- _. Doti► �o Minnesota Department of Transportation, Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55157 Minn Department of Transportation OF Tt • • April 27, 1990 Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Friends of Bicycling, It is with great enthusiasm that we announce to you the National Bike to Work Day project. This is our first statewide effort designed to build momentum in support of bicycle commuting. your enthusiasm. and support of this May 15th, National Bike to Work Day event will truly make it a success. This letter and the enclosed materials are reaching out to bicycle businesses and clubs, statewide chambers of commerce and bicycle advocates like you who wish to take action within your businesses and communities. Our request in very simple...... please help us to spread the word! Invite someone to bike with you to best friend. Pass these materials to poster in a prominent location; talk your children that day. Be creative, matter to what degree, will make a ►ork on May 15th .....your mayor, boss four local paper; place the enclosed it up and promise to go bike riding with whatever action you choM� to take. no significant difference. Minnesotans bicycle at almost twice the national average. It only makes sense that our state take a leading role in the promotion of this project. We thank you for doing what you can these next few weeks in support of bicycling and National Bike to Work Day. Please feel free to call us at 612- 297 -4778 to request additional materials for your business and community. Sincerely, Minnesota Department of Transportation 4 -H Metro Bicycle Program Minnesota Bicycle Advisory Board an tyua, ( )Ili • ,, l t,�, r" *a 12 PURCHASE JOURNAL N -01 WAD (� CITY OF 1Olt 1106 Oolm RE ILLO ND. INYORE M !MATE DATE STATUS MM OEIEIII►TION SAW" 5/04/0 14.00 J0L-CO OEM om vE1t0R TOTAL I15.00 i40l3 135.00 DOM 11pi0.1OE AYAL $M/o SM/o MOO AL-0 EDISMM LpN V6to1 TOTAL MOO ` 14115 157.4 REDS LNM MHOM1TM FARM $M/0 SM/0 19.4 AL-CO IM LMMN YSIt01 TOTAL 157.15 TOTAL ALL *MRS 114,64.12 0 11- 360.0000 1014 n- 11D-=$ 1014 • /3a?y Tm to WAD (� c= 111111111t NtM1R me m 1010 11- 360.0000 1014 n- 11D-=$ 1014 • /3a?y CITY COUNCIL PACKET - 5/8/90 #2 1325 am OF ion 0. OF CALLS is" - FIRE EMERGENCY M'TINIA SEA" - FIRE EMERGENCY NINIIETRISTA - FIRE EMERGENCY ORONO - FIRE EMERGENCY SNOREMOOD - F1 RE EMERGENCY TNIS Twill TOW MONTH MONTH TO DATE Tp DATE 42 45 144 109 s 9 23 21 21 21 62 4 1 0 6 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SPRUNG PARK - FIRE MAGAINCY 4 2 11 5 3 3 10 10 gIi11RL AID - FIRE EMERGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 WE R CALLS L 26 24 6-4 59 GIVINEIRICAL - 4 27 2 1 IIIIIASS i HISCILLANEMIS 4 7 15 7 . mm 1 4 g FALSE ALAW 4 3 7 3 00. OF NOVAS - MOUND FIRE EMERGENC TOTAL - MTKA 0CH FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - M'TRISTA FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - ORONO FIRE EMERGENCY TOT AL - SHOREWOOD FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - SP. PARK FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - MUTUAL AID FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL TOTAL D RILL HOURS 193 184 645 412 424 364 1141 721 617 548 1786 1133 89 0 129 66 14 0 14 11 103 0 143 77 125 61 235 264 10 0 67 131 366 54 31R 1:5 0 137 406 452 0 0 131 16 0 137 537 468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 48 327 76 52 65 218 150 131 113 545 226 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 172k 172k 6823 590 TO EIIE RGEtICY HOURS 500 1 424 1635 1742 952 1270 TOTAL FIRE H OU R S 48b TOTAL FIRE 6 EMEPGENCY HOURS 986 865 3377 2222 WuTU-L cID PECEIVED 0 0 1 4 �L •i0 'loEN _ 0 0 0 0 ig • • • r • C. HtNDERSON � City of Hound 6.00 P• R. HARSCNKE J. NAMS x X X E mm", Klam"Ota 2 0 2 1 19.00 .-0- 9. 9.50 HMO FIRE WARM= 19 7 27 30 6.00 114,0 6.00 42.00 6.0 6 168.75 6.00 180.00 roR Mont ar _x v, 22 6.00 Trmw X X DRIuS rYanEUpCZ TD! i 6.00 SIRE FICNTERS X X 2 19 00 ry ' 6.00 DATE ILLS DRILL ifAlt. i"08'AL in /4 PALM X YARD RAAIR RA!! 19.00 J. ANDERSEN X 6.00 T. PALM X 6.00 2 19.00 x x 2 19.00 26 6.00 156. 0 J - RARE X x 2 19.00 29 174.00 K. SIPPRE[L X X • 2 19.00 34 6.00 J. dEAUCRA"R X 2 -0- 6 6.00 6.00 198.00 D. BOYD x X 2 19.00 27 6.00 16,Z 6.00 144.00 X X 2 19.00 34 6.50 221.00 - 2 sawfte X X 2 1 2- 00 2fi 6 .00 ISM X X 2 19.00 24 X. CASEY X X ' 2 19.00 19.00 33 18 6.00 34 f35 69 986 6.00 ,939.75 X X 2 19.00 33 MAINT. 0,668.00 6.00 X X 2 19.00 29 6.00 174.00 S- EltIcKsaw X X 2 19.00 23 6.00 138.00 P- FT4-tr X X 2 19.00 29 6.00 6.00 174.00 X X 2 19.00 24 X X 2 19.00 37' C. HtNDERSON � 6.00 P• R. HARSCNKE J. NAMS x X X E X X :: 2 0 2 1 19.00 .-0- 9. 9.50 19 7 27 30 6.00 114,0 6.00 42.00 6.0 6 168.75 6.00 180.00 M. ImIsnu _x 22 6.00 Trmw X X 2 9.00 24 6.00 A. OPITZ X X 2 19 00 26 6.00 C. P in 6.00 PALM X X 2 19.00 34 6.00 T. PALM X X 2 19.00 37 6.00 222.00 X X X 2 19.00 23 6 X X 2 19.00 33 6.00 198.00 R. STALUTAN X X 2 19.00 24 6.00 144.00 T. SWENSON X X 2 19 27 6.00 W SVEN X X 2 19.00 21 6.00 ' 126 . 00 X Ix 2 19.00 18 6.00 108.00 34 f35 69 986 6.00 ,939.75 85 FRt 7'; 172!211RS 655.50 MAINT. 0,668.00 i Date: Y//4r / . 9 a DRILL R E P O R T Discipline and Team work Critique of Fires Pre- Plaining and Inspections Tools i Apparatus I d ent ifyinq Meeting P�tec Files First Aid and Rescue Operation Use of Self- Contained Masks • Tim Tim Pumper operation Fire Streams S Friction Loss House Burnings Natural i Propane Gas talk i Denonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio operations House Evolutions Nozzle i Hose Alliance Inhalator operation Note: Ho a Training Paid V Excused $ Unexcused Q Present, Not paid Miscellaneous: L^, PAhn - R. STA / /wwh -- R- feeiYe.1 Ge f-, 7h%'ova/ e-I 4 1 _ SPte/ - RA.,d. L km-d-- Ph / !•.sK - j( .Gf -,nd.i - PAwl H1.r.i - RpFw1 h.rr..�- �l...' �J.'Ra /� -Ti'1h lk�'MYf� T rA.wFd c7M SC�3 C�PN•,.� ,vK} /`:r�. ^ Ay /; IZy.cw `�Ktv.a '�.'a�rd c.�'fh Qm d n•, SeAri 1, 4 Rese.,e . A"'41 Idat ex ,Dept -. W..••ep- 06, 10"r- Z l / -- J. Andersen j�. G. Anderson _ j J. Babb 4% aT D. '17x newshemp Boyd D. Bryce S. Bryce D. Carlson J. Casey A . S. Collins M. David A% - Gr4sleeew � S. Erickson } t P. Fisk 7 A J. Garvais K. Grady a P. Henry C. Henderson G. Johnson 1 y� D. Landsman R. Marschke J. Nafus _ B. Niccum a /�- 4 5 1'Pf're 1/ 1\ M. Nelson ik A. Opitz G. Palm - M. Palm ��T- T. Palm 3' G. Pederson T. Rasmussen - Aa M. Savage �' /,L, R. Stallman �T�m)_ T. Swenson 3 W. Swenson �!��. R. Williams T. Williams, 1� o a! 1 3 ru*easter Ap )36%7 Nam 3OiAMM ZIU Dim on r KINNESOTA D R I L L REPORT Date: �/Y C' Tilm sIJK Discipline and Team work Pumper operation Critique of Fires Fire Streams i Friction Loss Pre- Plaininq and Inspections House Burnings Tools i Apparatus Natural i Propane Gas Identifying talk B Demonstrations Hand Extinguisher Operation Ladder Evolutions Nearing Protective Clothing Salvage Operations Files Radio Operations First Aid and Rescue House Evolutions Operation Nozzle i Hose Alliance _ Use of Self- Contained Masks Inhalator Operation Note: Hours Training Paid Excused $ Unexcused Q Present, Not paid /4/ .1.'1/g 8 44/90 Miscellaneous: k. 'h)At.Scl►)CE_ - C. l�/Q�d Pes�� , Rece Gra'.4. ♦h;�44 • Qn .46. #_Vg .'-S. ALA.- SWsi ?m,s i,c Nos -e . J. Andersen 416- Sr4ek"n 1'66 M. Nelson G. Anderson 197j- S. Erickson A. Opitz J. Babb P. Fisk �} G. Palm �►��y- J. Garvais Vz_ M. Palm 3..iNauei�aip K. Grady fib- T. Palm Lim D. Boyd �'� P. Henry ,�'/,� G. Pederson 1y, D. Hryce C. Henderson _2L#/j- T. Rasmussen S. Bryce G. Johnson- M. Savage >> i D. Carlson 9 B. Landsman �' j' R. Stallman �� - J. Casey R. Marschke .� ,� T. Swenson ,/ /1S. Collins J. Nafus ���TTT W. Swenson ]nom: M. David B. Niccum R. Williams A 6,44 Eti;e�hq�� � /�, 51'0P►e // 12. T. Williams D ter • ��0 ("'IT (A N K A vND MARCH 1990 MONTHLY REPORT PARK DEPARTMENT Parks a During April four of the seasonal summer help returned to work John Taffe, Bob Johnson, Dell Rudolph, and Kent Kirsh. As we do each year, we begin with a general clean -up of the parks and the maintenance building. Then, it is onto projects that where left from last fall. We are finishing up with installing the park signs, and repairs to areas where we riprapped and dredged. The drought last year did not allow the grass seed to germinate so we will be re- seeding those areas again. I have inspected each park and have completed a list of repairs for each site. This will be our main focus until the grass really begins growing. At that time, we assign two of the seasonal help to Just mowing. Hopefully, this will not be until • mid -May when we will then get one more seasonal helper, with the last one coming in early June. As you are aware, the park crew was assigned the mowing of the main business area along with sharing some of the weed spraying with the Street Department. Commo As mentioned before, Dell Rudolph, Dock Inspector is back. The assigning of docks for the 1990 season was the first task. All applications for the dock sites have been processed. More docks are being shared this year due to low water. Of the 443 recog- nized sites, only 335 have been allocated so far. To -date, holding fees have not been submitted for 48 unusable sites; 31 people have paid to hold their unusable site. Only 27 abutting residents have renewed their sites to -date. Cemetery Phil Haugen is now the caretaker for the cemetery. The first spring clean -up has been completed. The next step is to get ready for Memorial Day. The two signs denoting the cemetery will be installed by then; we have had to wait for special made posts to be delivered. Trees • Eight trees were removed from City property in April and some trees had damage to limbs from high winds. One notice was sent to a private property owner. 13.1 11 i C i �, \ � ■ �� \ /�, / \ 1 J MOUNC MINNESOTA 553A4 ;'2! a'2 -"55 MAY 39 1990 TO: MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL FROM: JOEL [RUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER RE: MARCH 3, 1990 We just keep rolling on. For the fourth consecutive month of 1990, we are up by a substantial amount. Sales for April were $75,518 compared to $67,132 in April of 1989. With 1/3 of the year gone, we are ahead of last year at this time by $27 and also by 1391 customers. If we projected these figures over the • course of the entire year, we possibly could have an annual in- crease in gross sales of $82,000, and an increase in customers of 4170. These additional sales translates into about $10,000 to $12,000 more in profits. Julie and I have completed training in our two new employees. It wasn't too stressful of an ordeal this time being that our new employees (Jennifer Pauly and Glenn Zalusky) are two very sharp, college educated people. There still is the matter of fine tuning them, but that also should take less time than the norm based on their performance already. I am going through the preliminary thought process of how to expand our beer storage area. Beer represents nearly half our annual sales. With business growing, we are literally bursting our seams. I've talked this over with Ed and showed him that by taking out some old, unused wood shelving in our hallway, we could increase the beer storage area by 60%. By doing so, we could also take more advantage of buying beer at a lower price from our beer distributors when their monthly sales promotions went )ff deal. JK:ls • JU?30 C:lTY of NIOl'ND MAY 4 1990 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR RE: APRIL FINANCE REPORT 5-4 MAY&n- C C ROAD MOUND MINNESOTA 55364 :612' 4'2 - "5c Balance April 1, 1990 Bought: Farm Cr. 8.50 CP 8.63 CP 8.45 Matured: CP T. Receipts CP Balance April 30, 1990 Due 4- 1 -91 Due 9 -28 -90 Due 10 -26 -90 Shearson Dain Dain $7,175,318 475,000 199,442 143,858 (199,613) (143,563) (171,869) 1989 AUDIT The 1989 Audit was presented to the Council on April 24, 1990. I would like to thank the Finance Staff for their help in preparing the financial reports. The 1989 audit will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association for evaluation for the Certificate Program. The requirements of the program go beyond the normal audit reports to provide readers of the audit report with P wide variety of information needed to help them evaluate the financial condition of the City. I am confident the 1989 audit report will receive the Certificate Award from GFOA. • C7 Marquette Shearson Dain 331 1 • April Finance Report May 4, 1990 StNIK CLEAN-UP For approximately two years, Fran and I have said that we should go to the records vault and go through and throw away whatever Possible and organize the remaining records we are required to keep. The process of going through the records stored in the vault took an entire week. Fran and I threw away (also filled many recycling bins) dumpsters full of old records. The end result is you can actually walk through the vault and immediately find what you are looking for. It will also be much easier to keep the vault organized as we bring down additional records each year. On April 20th the City Hall went through a spring clean -up day. The goal was to throw away (and recycle) any unnecessary records before we have to move to temporary office space during remodel- ing. The staff did a good job in gc ng through all of the reccrds. • 2 1332 TO: Ed Shukle FROM: Len Harrell SUBJECT: Monthly Report I. STATISTICS MOUND POLICE F341 Maywood Road Telephone 472 -3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 5449511 0 EMERGENCY 911 for April, 1990 The police department responded to 803 calls for serv- ice during the month of April. There were 32 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 4 criminal sexual conduct, 2 aggravated assaults, 4 burglaries, 21 larcenies, and 1 arson. There were 94 Part II offenses reported. Those of- fenses included 5 child abuse /neglect, 1 forgery /NSF checks, 21 criminal damage to property, 2 weapons violations, 8 narcotics violations, 5 liquor law viola- tions, li DWI's, 3 simple assaults, 12 domestics (5 with assaults), 12 harassment, 2 juvenile status of- fenses, and 12 other violations. The patrol division issued 129 adult citations and 4 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 20 citations. warnings were issued to 57 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 13 felony juvenile arrests and one adult felony arrest. Thirty adults and four juveniles were arrested for misdemeanors. There were 15 warrant ar- rests. The department assisted in 6 vehicular accidents, all property damage only. There were 44 medical emer- gencies and 93 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 15 occasions in April and requasted assis- tance 5 times. Property valued at $2,739 was stolen and $1,120 was recovered in April. 0 • 1333 • MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - APRIL, 1990 WI_ • The investigators worked on 5 child protection cases and 3 criminal sexual conduct cases. These I cases ac- counted for more than 40 hours of investigative time. There have been 22 child protection cases reported to date. In addition, cases involving burglary, arson, narcotics, assault, theft, deprivation of parental rights, fraud, theft of mail, NSF checks, damage to property and harassing communications were inves- tigated. Formal ceeplaints were issued in 7 cases; including false information to police and driving after suspen- sion, gross misdemeanor DWI, aggravated DWI, and refusal to take a chemical test. III. Personnel /Staffing • The department used approximately 34 hours of over -time during the month of April. Officers used 6 hours of sick time, 2 holidays, and 7 days of vacation. Officers earned 41 hours of comp -time and used 11 hours in April. IV. Training Officers received 57 days of training during the month. The training courses included canine training, bias crimes, emergency medical technician, property manage- ment, hazardous materials, homicide investigation, dynamic building entry, narcotics operations, and defensive tactics. Officers also attended an in -house firearms training session. IV. Police Reserves • 2 13aY APRIL, 1990 0 OFFEESES CLEARED EXCEPT. CLEARS aT MRESTED REPORT® Ur OUIW CLEARM AMST MUTT ANBIILF PART 1 CRIMES Romicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Seed Cordst 6 1 1 0 0 0 Robbery 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANr~ad Assault 2 0 1 1 1 0 auratary 0 1 1 0 2 Lorcenp 21 1 2 A 0 11 vehicle Theft 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aram 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 32 2 5 6 1 13 PART 11 CRIMES Child Abase /11"tect 5 3 2 0 1 0 Forg"/NSF Checks 1 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Damage to Property 21 0 1 0 0 0 -- psna 2 0 0 0 0 0 Narcotics a 0 0 7 a 0 Lim:- Laws 5 0 0 5 7 0 owl 11 0 0 11 11 0 Simple Assault 3 0 3 0 0 0 • Domestic Assault 5 0 i 1 1 0 Domestic (No Assault) 7 0 0 0 0 0 Narusment 12 0 2 0 0 0 Juvenile Status Offenses 2 0 0 2 0 i Publ is Powe 1 0 1 0 0 0 Trespassing 0 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Offenses 11 2 0 2 2 0 TOTAL 94 S 13 28 30 4 PART 111 a PART Iy Property Oamsge Accidents 6 Personal Injury Accidents 0 Fatal Accidents 0 Iledicals K Animal Complaints 93 Mutual Aid 15 Other General Investigatiore S14 TOTAL 672 Nemepin Canty Child Protection 5 CNIPS 0 TOTAL 603 7 18 34 31 17 • 1 1335 • MOUMD POLICE DRPLRTMZNT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT APRIL, 1990 • 1 1334 Tale YEAR TO LAST YEAR GENERAL ACTIVITY dOMMARY ]Nor= DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 78 311 274 Non - Hazardous Citations 15 78 84 Hazardous Warnings 6 45 34 Non - Hazardous Warnings 25 147 121 Verbal Warnings 158 533 424 Parking Citations 20 134 220 DWI 11 30 22 Over .10 9 23 13 Property Damage Accidents 5 16 43 Personal Injury Accidents 0 10 10 Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 Adult Felony Arrests 2 19 13 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 44 137 82 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 16 33 17 Juvenile Felony Arrests 13 20 12 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 4 15 9 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 4 8 4 • Part I Offenses 32 102 65 Part II Offenses 94 263 190 Medicals 19 83 95 Animal Complaints 93 247 298 Other Public Contacts 514 1,747 1,969 TOTAL 1,162 4,001 3,999 Assists 37 116 146 Follow -Ups 30 77 114 Henn. County Child Protection 5 14 17 Mutual Aid Given 15 66 83 Mutual Aid Requested 5 25 33 • 1 1334 ODUND POLICR DePAR'PMEMT ISONTSLY R6P0RT APRIL 1990 ADULT DWI 11 0 More than .10% HAC 9 0 Careless /Reckless Driving 1 0 Driving After Susp. or Rev. 6 0 Open Bottle 2 0 Speeding 72 3 No DL or Expired DL 1 0 Restriction on DL 0 0 Improper, Expired, or No Plates 4 0 Illegal Passing 0 O Stop Sign Violations 4 0 . Failure to Yield 0 0 Equipment Violations 0 0 HiR Leaving the Scene 0 0 No Insurance 1 0 Illegal or Unsafe Turn 0 0 Over the Centerline 0 0 Parking Violations 20 0 Crosswalk 3 1 Dog Ordinances 0 0 Derelict Autos 1 0 Seat Belt it 0 MV /ATV 0 0 • Miscellaneous Tags 2 -- 2 TOTAL 149 4 33? v C • SLY PROPERTY LOSS /UWVERY GMOMRY AML, 1990 Bikes Snowmobiles Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. Jewelry i Precious Metals Guns Acme Furnishings Radio 6 Electronic Equipment Vehicles i Vehicle Equipment Miscellaneous T0M 1 • STOLEN IEECOVERED $ 125 $ 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,026 700 743 40 0 0 45 0 0 0 546 140 254 200 $ 2,739 $ 1,120 1338 SOUND FOLIC! UPARTUM XONTNLY UPORT APRIL 1990 EaBi NGS ADULT �IIDC Ho Insurance 12 0 Traffic 3 1 Equipment 13 1 'Crosswalk. 1 0 Animals 4 0 Trash /Derelict Autos 8 0 Seat Belt 0 0 Trespassing o 11 Miscellaneous 3 0 TOTAL 44 13 ARRESTS Felony Warrants 1 0 Misdemeanor Warrants 14 0 • • • 1331 &A: 30-APR -90 CFSO3 PRIMARY ISN's ONLY? No 0 VITY CODES: ALL ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09000 SPEEDING 09001 J- SPEEDING 09002 NO 0 /l, EXPIRED D/L 09006 TEST REFUSAL 09010 RAC OVER .10 09012 OPEN BOTTLE 09014 STOP SIGN 09020 CARELESS /RECKLESS 09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 2 J- CROSSiN1lK VIOLATION 2 STOP ARM VIOLATION 09040 NO SEATRELT 09100 PARKING/ALL OTNER 09150 NO TRAILER PARKING 09200 DAS /DAR /DAC 09210 PLATES/NO-IMPROPER- EXPIRED 09220 NO INSURANCE /PROOF OF 09301 LOST PERSONS 09312 FOUND ANIMALS/IMPOUNDS 09313 FOUND PROPERTY 09420 DERELICT AUTO 09450 PROPERTY DAMAGL ACCIDENTS 09451 M/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. 0 INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT t - ENF02S CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 03/26/90 TNRU 04/25/90 -- - - - - - - - - - PATROLAREAS - - - - - - - - - -- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 00 90 TOTAL 14 1s 0 10 17 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 5 2 2 12 4 3 3 2 2 E 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 L 72 3 1 2 9 2 4 1 3 1 1 11 16 4 6 4 1 2 9 s 1 5 1 1340 • MN: 70•APR-Al CFB00 PRIMAR ISM'S ONLY? NO ACTIVITY CODES: All INSTALLATION NAME •- MOM POLICE DEPARTMENT ENF0aS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 03/26/90 THOU 04 /25/90 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09560 ANIMAL BITES /OTHER 09561 DOG BITE 09562 CAT BITES 09563 DOG AT LARGE 09720 SUDDEN DEATNS /BODIES FOU 09730 MEDICALS 09731 DETON- NEDICALS 09732 CRISIS INT.- MEOICALS 09735 100 INJUR 09740 MENTAL CASES 09M ALL OTNER/UNCLASSIFIEO 09801 DOMESTIC /MO ASSAULT 09900 ALL NCCP CASES 09904 OPEN DOOR /ALARMS 09930 HANDGUN APPLICATION 09945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 09950 INTELLIGENCE 099x0 WARRANTS l� 09992 MUTUAL A1100 09993 MUt Al A10 /6500 09996 MUTUAL A10 /NARCOTICS A3252 ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJUPY-HANDS ETC-ADLT -ACO ASOOI ASLT S- UNKNOWN ACT-UNK WEAPON- ADLT-FAM PAGE 2 • -- - - - - - - - - - PATROLAREAS - - - - ---- --- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 1 1 1 1 / 3 1 1 1 2 3 2 2 3 3 10 2 6 24 2 7 3 13 2 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 6 • 4 1 1 1 7 1 3 1 5 2 1 3 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 3 2 6 3 1 15 a a 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 rI 1341 RUM: 30- APR -90 CFS03 PRINUT ISM'$ ONLY? NO 0 IVITY CODES: ALL INSTALLATION MAIZE MOM POLICE DEPARTMENT E M F 0 2 S CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 03/26/90 THRU 04 /25/90 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION A5351 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-NAMDS-ADLT -FAM A5352 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM- HANDS-ADLT-ACO A5354 ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM-HANDS-CNLD -FAM A5355 ASLT S- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- H AND S-CNLD-ACQ AM ASLT- COERCION- FE- THREAT MAK CRM CNG-UMK RELAT 83394 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U -UNK HEAP -COM THEFT 83434 BURG 3 -UNOCC RES NO FRC -D-UNK HEAP -Cpl THEFT 84090 BURG 4 -AT FRC NRES-U-UNK HEAP -UNK ACT 04990 BURG 4 -AT FRC RES -U -UNK HEAP-UNK ACT D8500 DRUGS -SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA-POSSESSION 0 ARSON 1-UNINNB -NO HEA-SG RESID-S100DO-S19999 13060 CRIM AGNST FAN- MS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD 13070 CRIM AGNS1 FAN- NS-14ALIC PUNISHMENT CHILD J2500 TRAFFIC-GM -DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J2700 TRAF- ACCID-GM- AGGRAVATED VIOLATION J3500 TRAF- ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR LI M CSC 1 -NO FRC-ACQUAINT -UNDER 13-F L1841 CSC 1- MULTIPLE ACTS-OTM FAN -UNDER 13-F L4021 CSC 2 HEAP -FEAR GBN -UNK ACT - PARENT -UNDER 13 -F 14041 CSC 2 HEAP -UNK ACT-OTN FAN -UNDER 13 -F N3003 JUVENILE-HABITUAL TRUANT M4199 LIQUOR - OTHrA M5313 JUVENILE-CURFEW r PAGE 3 - - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 1 3 4 1 1 2 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 S 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 1 13yst RUN 30- APR -90 INSTALLATION NAME - NOIJW POLICE DEPARTMENT PAW 6 CFSO3 •••••• PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S ACTIVITY CODES: All CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 03/26/90 THRU 04 /25/90 ACT - - - - - - - - - - - PATROLAREAS - - - - - - - - - - - CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL N5350 RUNAWAY 1 1 N6501 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA-POSSESSION 1 1 2 4 NMI FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER 1 1 NB199 CRUELTY TO ANIMALS -OTHER 2 2 N3070 DISTURB PEACE-MS-PUBLIC NUISANCE 1 1 ..3190 DISTURB PEACE -MS- NARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 3 1 3 1 1 9 03882 OBSENITY- MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL-ADULT 1 2 3 P1110 PROP DA14AGE-FE-PRIVATE -UMK INTENT 1 1 P3110 PROP DANAGE-NS- PRIVATE INTENT 5 10 1 3 19 P3600 LITTER - UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS 1 1 T2029 THEFT-S251- S2500 BUILDIN.-OTN PROP 1 1 T4021 THEFT -5250 LESS- NS-FRM 9b.LDING -MONEY 2 1 3 T4029 THEFT-S250 LESS- NS-FRM BUILDING -0TH PROP 1 1 2 74059 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS -0TH PROP i 1 T4069 THEFT -5250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL-OTN PROP 2 1 3 T4099 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP 2 2 74159 THEFT -5250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -0TH PROP 1 2 3 U3016 THEFT -MS -BY CNECK-S250 LESS 1 1 U3066 THEFT -MS -BY SWINDLE OR TRICK-S250 LESS 1 1 U3286 THEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING LESS 1 2 3 U3496 THEFT- NS-BICYCLE -NO 140TOR -250 LESS 1 1 2 V3190 WEAPONS-MS-USES -OTHER TYPE-NO CHAR 2 2 • • • 13430 RUM: 30-AN -50 CFS03 r26 lsM's oMLrt Mo VITY CODES: ALL ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION REPORT TOTALS: • 0 INSTALLATION MANE NOUIID POLICE DEPARTMENT PACE S ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 03/26/90 TNRU 04/25/90 - - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - • - - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 40 SO SO 70 80 90 TOTAL 66 45 96 74 38 1 6 9 387 )34� RUN: 30- APR -90 INSTALLATION NAVE NOW POLICE DEPARTMENT MBE 1 OFFOI •••••• PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DISPOSITION CODES: ALL ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION • GRID: ALL 03/26/90 TNRU 04 125190 / ---------------- OFFENSES CLEARED -----------------/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL ----BY ARREST - --- IT TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED - -- --------•- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED A3252 1 0 ! 0 1 0 O 1 100.0 ASLT 3-SUBSTANTIAL INJURY -HANDS ETC-ADLT-ACO A5001 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 ASLT S-UNKNOWI ACT-UNK WEAPON-ADLT-FAN AS351 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 4 100.0 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRN-NAIDS-ADLT-FAN A5352 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 100.0 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NO-NANDS-ADLT-ACC A5354 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM- HANDS- CNLD-FM AMS 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM-RANDS-CNLO-ACC A7WO 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100 ASLT-COERCION -FE- THREAT MAK CNN CNG-UNK RELAT 83394 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 BURG 3-UNOCC RES FRC-U -UNK YEAP-COM THEFT 83634 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 BURG 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC -D-UNK NEAP-COM THEFT 84090 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 BURR 4 -AT FRC NRES-U -UNK NEAP-UNK ACT 84990 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 ROG 4 -AT FRC RES-U-UNK NEAP-UNK ACT DE 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 Dk -SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA- POSSESSION F1212 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 ARSON 1-UNINNB -NO WEA -SG RE:ID-S10000-519999 13060 3 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 CRIM AGNST FAN-MS-NEGLFCT OF A CHILD 13070 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 CRIM AGNST FAN- MS-MALIC PUNISHMENT CHILD J 13y 5 RUN: 30- APR - INSTALLATION NAME - MOUD POLICE DEPARTMENT PAM 2 OFFO1 •••••• PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DIFTION CODES: ALL ITT CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 03/26/90 TMRU 04 /25/90 /----- ----- - ----- OFFENSES CLEARED - --------- -- - - - --/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL ----RT ARREST ---- BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED J2500 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 TRAFFIC-GNI -DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J27W 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 TRAF- ACC 10- GM- AGGRAVATED VIOLATION J35M 5 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 100.0 TRAF- ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR L11T1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 CSC 1 -00 FRC- ACQUAINT -UNDER 13-F 0641 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 CSC 1 - MULTIPLE ACTS-OTN FAN-U 13-F L4021 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 CSC 2 " -FEAR GBN-UNK ACT - PARENT -UNDER 13-F L� 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 C AP -UMK ACT-OTN FAN -UNDER 13 -F N3003 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 JUVENILE - MAIITUAL TRUANT M4199 5 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 100.0 LIOLM - OTHER M5313 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 JUVENILE M6501 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA- POSSESSION NMI 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER M8199 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 CRUELTY TO ANIMALS N3070 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 OISTL= PEACE-MS- PUBLIC NUISANCE N3130 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 DISTU" PEACE -MS- EMERGEENCY TELEPHONE CALLS f u 1314 Mill: 30-APR-90 INSTALLATION NNE MGM POLICE DEPARTIENT PAGE 3 OFF01 •••••• 1 ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DISPOSITION CODES: All ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITIhI • GRID: ALL 03 /26/90 THOU 04/25/90 /------ ---------- OFFENSES CLEARED ------- ----------/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL - ---BY ARREST - --- BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPOR.ED UNFOUNDED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED 03190 8 0 8 6 0 0 2 2 25.0 DISTURB PEACE COMMUNICATIONS 03882 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 OSSENITT- MS-OBSCENE PHONE CALL -ADULT ►1110 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 PROP DAMAGE-FE-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3110 19 0 19 18 0 0 1 1 5.2 PRO DAMAGE- MS-PRIVATE-UK INTENT ►3600 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 LITTER - UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARRAGE-NS T2029 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 TNEFT-5251- 52500-FE-I'M lUILDING-OTN PROD T4021 3 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 6� THEFT -5250 LESS-MS-FRN RUILDING-NONEY T4029 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 $0.0 THEFT -52SO LESS- MS-FRM RUILDING-OTN PROP T4059 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT -5250 LESS- MS -FRM YARDS-OTN PROD T4069 3 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT -5250 LESS- MS-FRM IIAIL-OTN PROP T4099 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 TNEFT-S25O LESS-MS-FRN SELF SRV GAS-OTN PROP T4159 3 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3 TNEFT-S250 LESS-HS-FRN MOTOR VEHICLE-OTN PROP U3016 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT -MS-ST CHECK-S250 LESS U3066 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 TNEFT•MS'RT SWINDLE OR TRICK-5250 LESS u3286 3 0 3 1 1 1 0 2 66.6 THEFT - MS-SNOPLIFTING-5250 LESS • 13y"? NO: 10•APR -90 INSTALLATION NAME NOIRD POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE A OFFOt •••••• PR! MV ISN'S ONLY? 10 E F 0 R S TION CODES: All IVITT CODES: All OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: All 03 /26190 TNRU 04/25/90 /- --------------- OFFENSES CLEARED -----------------I ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFCIISES ACTUAL -- --RY ARREST - - -- RY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED U3496 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 TNEFT- NS- BICTCLE-00 NOTOR-250 LESS U3190 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 IEAPOMS-NS-USES-OTNER TTPE -NO CNAR REPORT TOTALS - 110 7 103 51 28 6 Is 52 SO.4 • • 1 3` S CITY ()I.\ I(A 'ND May 2, 1990 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK RE: APRIL MONTHLY REPORT The Council had 2 regular meetings and 1 Committee of the Whole meeting in April. There were minutes, 12 resolutions and follow - up items from these meetings. The Tax Forfeit Office of Hennepin County is getting ready for their annual sale and there were a number of people calling with questions before the sale. The bids were opened on the 1990 Sealcoating Project and awarded • to Bituminous Roadways. April was cleaning month for the basement and vault of City Hall. This has not been done for a considerable amount of time. Since the area is small you cannot go thru things down there so we rented a truck to move everything from the vault and basement and then sift thru it. We had the truck for 5 days and the weather cooperated most of the week. The things I had to go thru required looking at each file individually so I spent a good 2 and a half weeks any time I had a free minute. We then had the office clean -up day and that worked out very well also. We now should have a minimum of things to move to the new area for the interim when they are remodeling the present city hall. I also did microfilming of the packets and indexing of the resolutions and ordinances on the new computer program Clerk's Index. This works slick. The Minnesota Clerk's and Finance Officers Association held its annual meeting in Brainerd and was attended by approximately 300 members. We had good educational sessions and I was appointed as a Director -at -Large on the Executive Board. I attended a time management class put on :_v the Franklin Inter- national Institute. fc j3yq moviag • t • C I TY OF MMM 5341 May.wod Road MOued. MN 55364 NN4Wtl0 ACTIN MgPO rT w , r ,. April n 1»p asw. 1 65.000 3 262.000 New sESOs a ar some Tar w.rwy a waar asm" Tow ftwomeftow a 4 100 5 100 100 17.5!9 6 27.509 dec13.940 22 751 30 101.301 TOW ampo~ 102.380 48 244.130 • Mtgp KTE ,r.r �, wa..� • �^ � � Warr MT. Church /Pup! V24812.6354 2 4 Tow �"�"� M 10 763.749 '�'"K ma �e � 61 1.269.879 Ta. C.M....�n. Ot � � T M TM. Es.,..0.n. 6 21 2 16 0 I C I 16 1 E i 39 126 24 61 '� ++ Y..,... a ' 'O'"` 6 21 2 16 0 0 16 39 126 1350 MOUND POLICE RESERVES NONTNLT NOURS ARIL. 1990 • NONTNLT ACTIVITIES Emeriiencr Coll Outs Earth Dar Dance R1 Nelson R4 Flawing RS Fox 410 Swanson R11 Ronain 112 Shell R13 Larson R14 zuccero In training K. Larson R. Jazowaki 116 Nawks 117 Kohman 123 Vogel 128 Seren RS6 Fox, K. 159 Janowski 135 1 1 DETAILS ENER RES. CONN N/F TRAIN INSTR RIDE MEET C/0 SQUAD SERV RAIL INS T104 ALONG ADNIN INS TOTAL BADGE 0 1 9.0 - 4.0 - - - 26.S 10.0 49.S 4 9.5 - 3.0 - - - 24.S - - 36.0 S 17.5 11.5 3.0 - - - 10.0 - 42.0 10 - - - - - 0 11 0 12 0 13 3.0 - - - - - - - - 3.0 14 0 16 1.5 - - - - - - - - 1.5 17 - - - - - - - - 0 23 - - - - - - - 0 28 6.S 4.0 - - - - - 10.5 S6 14.0 4.5 - - - - 3.0 4.0 - S9 10.5 - 3.5 - - - 14.0 - S7 se TOTAL 70.S 20.0 13.S 0 0 0 78.0 14.0 0 196.0 NONTNLT ACTIVITIES Emeriiencr Coll Outs Earth Dar Dance R1 Nelson R4 Flawing RS Fox 410 Swanson R11 Ronain 112 Shell R13 Larson R14 zuccero In training K. Larson R. Jazowaki 116 Nawks 117 Kohman 123 Vogel 128 Seren RS6 Fox, K. 159 Janowski 135 1 1 s • • OFFICER Butch Sawks Ruth velvet Steve Kaltman . Sherry 2ueesre Dove Nelsen John Regain Jeff Fleming Makike Swenson Tom $ *yen Jim Fox Damian $hell Katie Fox TOTAL$ KF /sh 2 t360%-, NOUND POLICE RESERVES SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS APRIL, 1990 DEPOSIT S 6.SO NALANCE 5414.SO ' 0 498.50 0 104.00 6.SO 162.50 26.00 298.00 0 149.00 26.00 182.00 0 6.S0 13.00 65.00 45.S0 110.50 0 39.00 39.00 143.00 $162.50 $2,172.S0 2 t360%-, AL ` AI 1 (A `I L T N D May 4, 1990 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator SUBJECT: April's Recycling April was a very busy month with the cleaning at City Hall and the Westonka Area Clean Sweep. City Hall received 3 extra office paper bins, from the Clean Sweep we received a dump truck full of recycables (cans and glass). The Earth Day held at the VFW went very well for being the first one. I showed videos and had some items made from recycable items made by the first graders. Our participation rate for March was 30 %, April's participation was 3L °i Office paper picked up at City Hall was 560 lbs. Our household count increased by 1,056 for April. Tonnage for April was 55.71 tons. • • r� 11645 May 7, 1990 MO'. %:. MWNESC.'� . Eta ... .. TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: April's Shop Report • PARKS The Parks Dept. took delivery on two new trucks this month. The new 1 -ton dump required a custom built hitch which we built and installed here. The 3/4 ton pickup was outiftted with city radio and warning lights. Other Park repaires were rewiring of trailers, Unit 12, 1978 Chev. 1 -ton the torque converter went out of the transmission and was replaced by Kennedy Transmission as it was a warrented item. POLICE DEPT. 842 - 88 Chev. required extensive repairs as a result of a chase. The front cowl was damaged, the ignition modules, misc. wiring. The approximate damage cost was about $1,000. 841 - 89 Pontiac needed new brakes and service 844 - 88 Chev. K -9 car, 2 new front itres and service 846 - 89 Pontiac - service STREET The blacktop roller had to be serviced and prepared for the patching season. SE _WE_ R & WAT The Sewer tank had to have the w;3tcr pump replaced. The jet machine for cleaning sewer lines was also serviced and prepared for the cleaning se,3sc�n May 2, 1990 T0: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. SUBJECT: April's Activity K,.port WATER DEPT. • We pumped 23,296,000 gallons of water. There were 5 T -off for non - payment. Street repairs were completed at County Road 15 at First Minnesota and at Williams Store on Commerce Blvd. Pat and I attended a one day class on hydrant maintenance, manhole repair and water meters. We had 2 pump motors go bad this month. Well #1 motor and #6 motor, both have electrical problems. We are going to repair Well #1 first then #6. Locates for utilities are at 58 for April. We are now going to look into purchasing a Fax to send and receive locate requests. We are still working on our stuck meter list and meter repair. SEWER DEPT. The Sewer Dept. has finished wet well cleaning and should finish filter cleaning by May 11. From there we will begin sewer line cleaning. • /351/ CITY (A May 2, 1990 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Geno Hoff Street Supt. SUBJECT: April's Activity Report 0 We spent most of the month sweeping streets, I thought that we • could finish in April but the weather didn't cooperate. We had some days when it snowed and alot of cold days when we couldn't use water. The way it looks now if we don't have too many interruptions we should be finishing the first round of sweeping the 2nd week in May. We've been kept busy getting contractors lined up for work to be done on County Roads that were dug up for the repair of waternain breaks. The repair work in front of First MinnesoLa had priorty. As you may know this is a cement pavement road, 10" thick with a 4" blacktop overlay. We got 4 quotes from contractors, 3 for the cement work and 1 for blacktop. The conrete work ranged in price from $10,600 to $5,600, P.C.I. did the work. The blacktop bid was $1,100 that was done by Dan Dunsmore Co. We had Safety Flare Co. set up traffic control which cost $700. By the way, for those who thought the City was taking too much time to do the job, Hennepin County requires the barricades to stay in place for at least 72 hours after each pour of concrete, we had 2 pours, 6 days plus the weekend. The patch that was repaired on County f2na(I I10 in front of WiI11 "ns CIothi11 storc to_)k 3 days. The first day we dug up Williams water service and rr' placed it 'Ihe second day poured 11 sidewalks and curb ,and �rrtter and th third d, +y rcpairod the street. The hill tr-,r nrete rnd blacktc w,rs $1,720. We have iwc more rrp,rrr5n ni:nt rd, Bartlett rnd Lynwood /306 13 We have been hauling concrete and blacktop to Mayer for recycling in our spare time, which we don't have much of. CEMETERY Layed out 1 grave and 6 stones. SIGN WORK 3 - No parking signs and posts 2 - Stop signs complete with posts 2 - No Congregating or Cruising 2- Street sign names 1 - Handicap parking 1 - No Dumping 1 - Dead End New post for Marlboro and Brunswick, we also pulled road restrictions the 24th. We had our CBD parking lots striped the 21st. • 13 5tv = `EM # )3 -6 MtNNET LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT a ye 4C_ EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 61214737033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR David H. Cochran. Chair TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL. DATE: MAY 4,1990 Greenwood Alban O. Foster. Vice Chair Deephaven FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE Jan Soawinkel, Secretary Minnetonka Beach John Lawm T su RECD MAY 4 IM u.,.. Mlnnetrista SUBJECT: APRIL REPORT - LMCD Douglas E. Babcock Spring Park Marvin Bonin T o" k ' B ay James N. Grathwol 1. GENERAL INTEREST ITEMS, — — Excelsior JoEllen L. Hurr Orono 1.1 Euraslon Watermllfoll Task Force_ John G. Malinke Victoria Only two bids were received for the weed hauling. The T W:;,= � i "'°" contract has been tentatively awarded to Ceres of Roseville, Robert K Minn Pillsbury pending determination that their large trucks can be efficiently Roben Ra=op serviced with our loading equipment. Sufficient resumes for r W Ree staffing the operation have been received. Final selections are M ound Roben E. Slocum being made. Harvesting is due to start May 29th with training for wtodland the crew two days ahead of that. $33.000 has been received from private donors, against a budget plan of $55,000. Still no word has been received from the Corps of Engineers on their matching funds. We are continuing to plan without them. 1.2. Comprehensive Lake Management Plan The draft plan has been circulated and comments are being collected. 1.3 Other General Interest Items, The personal water craft ordinance had its second reading. Numerous changes hail beem made at the Lake Use Committee meeting, working with representatives of the PWC users and renters. The second reading draft was much more acceptable in general, but was still subject to some adverse comment. The prolonged operation section was retained and strenthened in language. Only one lakeshore resident showed up to speak about the well recognized noise nuisance caused by the macines. He, however, was well prepared and very articulate. At my suggestion, the LMCD board has approved a program for the marking of Underwater Found Obstructions (UFO's). When a boater finds such an obstacle (perhaps by losing his outer drive), he wili mark the rock and notify the LMCD. We will be go with him to locate the obstacle and drop in a regular (but smaller) warning buoy, stating "ROCK ". This marking operation will be done by a volunteer, using the pontoon equipment from • the v.eed operation. We hope by this to make the lake mope boater friendly during this low water period. 2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS _ MO 1ND Several bass fishiiig contests were approved for weigh in at Mound Bay park. One or so of these a year in this overcrowded location, I feel, should be sufficient for Mound's contribution to this use. The weigh in can well be moved around so that all loca ns can similarly contribute. You might want to consider this for future.years. om eese Mound Representative Lake Minnetonka Conservation District TR:mac cc. Gene Strommen C. 01 -1-N F C LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE • AGENDA pEt MAY 71990 7:30 a.m., Saturday, May 12, 1990 1. Dock license renewals as approved by /or time elapsed by cities, per listing through 5/11/90 2. Temporary low water variance requests (as may be submitted, item open to late submittals) 3. Bean's Greenwood Marina minor adjustment to 1990 dock license requesting move of slip #101 from location next to slip #98 to location next to slip #6. 4. Environmental Assessment Worksheet draft for city of Deephaven special density application for 8 new slips 5. Marina practice through public advertising to secure boat storage on trailers in lieu of slip storage, to compensate for slips out of service due to low water 6. Use of lake water for lawn sprinkling, proposing that cities assist LMCD in :ampaigning for voluntary compliance in conjunction with published sprinkling control programs as each city may require 7. Lake inspection tour, recommending inspection priorities be identified for the 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. tour, following a brief June 9 Water Structures Committee meeting to address issues of timely significance 8. Progress update on Priority Study items as related to the moratorium ordinance, specific to: a. Wetlands as a consideration in measuring total shoreline * Staff communication to cities requesting assistance in wetland inventory b. Review of the 100' and 200' dock extension rule /policy * Staff to review multiple dock licenses which extend beyond 100' c. Amenity Value Study following initial recommendations of 2/5%90 * Further subcommittee assessment of amenities as determined from staff assessment of types of amenities now in place from special density licenses issued in the past three to five years 9. Additional business ENVIRONMENT 1. Eurasian water milfoil operating personnel progress; weed harvesting program: a. Operating personnel interview /hiring progress b. Equipment purchase progress • C. Training and starting progress preparations 2. U F 0 program progress 3. Draft bake Minnetonka Dredging Policy Interagency agreement as presented following initial review of MN DNR, MCWD & LMCD 5 -3-90 a � v 3/14/90 KOR L MINNETONKA LAKE - HENNEPIN COUNTY Period of Record 5/30/06 - 1/18/90 Entire period of record Hydro year (April - October) Lowest month (August) Lowest month (September) Exceedance Percentages 7!5% k 928.7 927.9 926.3 928.8 927.9 926.4 - 927.5 - 928.5 OHM • 929.4 and 25% exceedance for hydro year a 929.4 Mater Surface Elevation 3/12/90 ■ 925.67 • 9S% exceedance 3/15/90 s 925.80 • 926.2 135 MnDNR DIVISION of WATERS LAKES -08 AVERAGE MONTHLY WATER LEVEL SUMMARY Report Date 03/15/90 • MINNETONKA LAKE HENNEPIN COUNTY ID 27-0133 Sub -basin OU Region 6 Area 2 MONTH MIN (Date) MAX (Date) RANGE AVG a Rdas January 921.81 (01/10/38) 929.51 (01 /10/66) 7.10 427. 1: February 921.79 (02/01/38) 929.74 (02/25/66) 7.95 9:8.vd a8 March 921.97 (03/15/38) 929.90 (03/31/83) 7.93 9:8.16 :_ April 922.42 (04/29/38) 930.34 (04/29/86) 7.92 928.70 ___ May 922.61 (05/08/38) 930.40 (05/01/86) 7 .7 9 4 2 8 . 6 ' 2° ' June 923.01 (06/14/38) 930.36 (06/15/06) 7.35 -'►28. 4 � `- July 922.31 (07/31/34) 930.43 (07/14/78) 8.12 928. :k >% August 922.17 (08/30/34) 930.34 (08/29/51) 8.17 928.1'_• September 922.08 (09/23/37) 930.51 (09114/51) 8.43 928.08 262 October 921.98 (10/30/37) 929.94 (10/13/51) 8.01 927.92 254 November 921.91 (11/23/37) 929.63 (11/08/51) 7.72 927.86 181 December 921.78 (12/13/37) 929.55 (12/13/65) 7.77 927.78 109 Period of Record 05/30/06 - 01/18/90 Datum Adjustment 1929 Total number of Readings: 2632 High Recorded: 930.51 (09/14/51) Lowest Recorded: 921.78 (12/13/37) Ranqe All Readings: 8.73 Mean All Readings: 928.25 • 1351 ATTACHMENT A o DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES METAL REGION DIVISION OF WATERS �"& 296 -7523 1200 WARNER RD., ST. PAUL, MN. 55106 retNa January 5, 1990 C, 90 Mr. Gene Strommen Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 402 East Lake Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Dear Mr. Strommen: RE: LARK LEVEL AUGMENTATION, LAKE MINNETONKA (#27-13 It is our understanding that questions have recently arisen regarding the possibility of lake level augmentation for Lake Minnetonka. As you realize, the ONR has regulatory authority over all wate appropriat (including both ground and sur =ace), and that aperopr:ations greater than 10,000 gallons per day (gpd) or 1 mi?1_on gallons per year (mgy) require a DNR permit. Therefore, a OUR permit would be needed for augmentation of Lake Minnetonka. Minnesota Statutes 105.41 Subd. la. lists the State priorities for the appropriation and use of water as :ollows: First Prior Domestic water supply, excluding industrial and commercial uses of municipal water supply. Second Priority Any use of water that involves less than 10,000 gallons of water per day. For purposes of this section, "consumption" shall mean water withdrawn from a supply which is lost for immediate further use in the area. Third Priority Agricultural irrigation, involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day, and processing of agricultural produc Fourth Priority Power production, involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. Fifth Priority other uses, involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. /300 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER btamples of fifth priority uses include a=- agricultural irr atiaa ( golf courses, Mks) most - - -rcial /industrial uses (sas�f�sawl washing, construction dewatering) and �-- at -ief*g water levels in lakes, ponds or impoundments for recreational or osna�entsl reasons. As is painfully obvious in the Lake Minnetonka area, water levels of many of the lakes are very low as a result of the recent drought. As noted above, however, lake level augmentation is a low priority use of the State's water resources. In July of 1988, a drought policy decision was made by the DMR Division of Waters that "we will aay new permits for tha sole purpose of maintenance /augmeautiaa of water levels for lakes, ponds or impoundments using surface V "7 R or Eucepti for unique activities w1U be judged an an inavlAnsl basis." All new and pending applications will be hold in a pending status until the drought eases (See Ran 8arnaek memo of July 11, 1988.) Sb date the drought conditions persist, and it is impossible to predict when the drought will ease. It is a responsibility of the DKR, and the State, to encourage conservation of the State's resources. for ==ple, the 1949 Legislature took separate action on the "once through" uses of water for cooling, etc.; a new fee schedule, which will escalate over time, makes it prohibitively expensive to use once through • cooling methods :n lieu of newer, more conservative methods :or cooling. It is possible that the 1990 Legislatu will be examining the water level augmentaiton issue and give further direction /clarification to the statutes. I hope this clarifies the DNR's jurisdiction and policies regarding the possibility of augmenting Lake Minnetonka. Please contact me if the LMC7 has further questions in this matter. Sincerely, �-� J L. Stine Regional Hydrologist Enclosure: 7/11/88 memo cc: J. Japs, water Allocation Programs - DOW Minneha.ha Creek WSD :lk- • /3o/ dor : _ ATTACHMENT B°' ��-- »► • ' STATE Of tea► Natural Resources - ? of gate -s Of fice Memorandum . om : July 11. 190E 10 - W oral Hydrologists ROM ,Aoat ni strator JUL 111393 Permits and Land Use Section F "Con 296 -0440 WAM suSAR DROUGHT POLICY FOR APPROPRIATION PERMIT APPLICATION A. In clarification of last reeks brief wean, our current policy is to not issue any new permits for surface water appropriations within We watersheds of rivers with pewit suspensions. As an addendum to this policy, we will also not issue any now permits for the sole purpose of maintenance /augmenution or water levels for lakes, ponds or imoounaments using surface Mater or groundwater. Exceptions for unicue activities wiii ae juogeo on an individual basis. Ail pending or new applications for th_se activities snould be held in a oenoinc sta= The applicant snould oe advised of our polices ano informed, in writ: ^ ;. _;.t: no a:- wil oc taken on tjeir aaolicstion unt'. i the crouc;.: e_ses. Ine actlican: may elect to wittieraw .ne auol - ion or leave '.: in aencino sum s until the ar:ucnt s itu ation .. Improves. Only :hest = oplicatic -s ::+at Wculd no - ally warrant such action should oe "denied ". This wiil avoid unnecessary nearin; oemares. AS a reminder, M .S. 105.41, subs, la lists the priorities for water use: First priority. Domestic water supply. S - and priority. Uses of water that corsume less than 10,000 gallons of water per day; Third priority. Agricultural irrica:iun and :rode -sing of -• agr icultural p rocuc:s; (NM This includes sod farina) our•.h pri or! ty. Power production; and =ifth pr'or'ty. Otter uses, whi :ti ;onsume more than 10,00C gallons per Gay. Examples of 5 uses in - cluae nor aor'csltural irrigation • p riority Golf courses, parks) , mos corrner : :ai,'!nc::striai uses (sara /grtvel washin5, cons water - ing) an- maintaining water levels in lakeS, oonas or isaoounoments `cr recreational cr ornemcn;ai raa :ons. ! 3� M gA I Nydrologists Except an the waters where we have, or will, suspend appreprlatiens because of protected flow /elevation concerns, 411 current caroits resin in effect. B. Trout Strem /Protected Flows • As discussed during the conference call it will not be feasible to make protected now determinations on =11 Strom that are also trout streawa. Our efforts will be focused on the larger rivers and Strom of the State. Detersination to grant, deny or limit appropriation shail be based _ on FACTUAL information, provided by Section Fisheries, relating to NIRTMT Ows necessary to sustain the trout fishery. C. Expediting Ground Later Appropriation Permits for Suspended Surface Hater Appropriators. For the select suspended permlttees who have an adequate ground water alternative for water supply. a Temporary Appropriations Permit can be authorized by the Regional Hydrologist. The following criteria will be used in processing the permit: 1. The aooiicat'on must have been suspended from a surface water resource. Z. A permit application for the ground or alternative source must have been receive*. 3. The applicant, or the reviewing hydrologist must have contacted the Sk0 watershed and county, as applicable, and not have major objections voiced. 4. The point of taking must not be in an area where :here is a history of proven interference (consult the permits manual for guidance), or through professional judgement or use of the Thies equation a determination is made by the reviewing hydrologist that interference is not likely to occur. S. The permittee has had the well constructed and has submitted a Water Well Record and Zest pumping information before the permit Is Issued (the applicant should be encouraged to use the Irrigation system during test pumping to reduce the impact on - stressed crops). 6. Using the permit form, type TEMPORARY at the too and process and sign as you would a reguiar temporary permit.. 7. Include the following special provisions in all of these temporary permits: t3W3 N • . T onal "rologists a. This permit expires on November 1, 19N but maybe extended after formal evaluation of the permit application if a permanent authorization has been requested. • b. If notified by the ONR that well interference is suspected and probable from your appropriation, based on confirmation of a well interference complaint, all appropriation must cease immediately until the __..._ . . _.. intereerenca is resolved. • The suspended permittees are to be given highest priority by staff. NaKe your needs known to Kent lokkesm+oe or Ron Harnack if the region is unable to respond within a three day timeframe from when a Mater Well Record information is provided. based on Regional - workloads this interim procedure is being reviewed for application MT • _::_: on other groundwater appropriation requests. Attached is an example of the type of permit and associated special provisions that are to be used for these TEMPORARY authorizations. • 0. Weil Interference Procedures (as outlined in the August 11, 1986, version of the well interference Proceeurt, with clan "ication). 1. When one or more comolainants contacts the DNR claiming they are currently "out of water" ano claiming gnat one or more nearby high capacity well(s) is causing or suspected of causing interference with their water supply, oct?. n -.he a.. ^son' s name, address, pnone number, legal description wnere impacted well is located, suspected approoriator(s) name, address and legal description if known or location with respect to the impacted well. Advise the person that you will be Tailing a complaint form that must be completely filled out, returned for evaluation and validation before anything can be done to addreess the problem. The form to be returned to the regional office as soon as possible. Stress that if ttie form is not completely filled out that the form will be returned for completion (the verification by a licensed well driller is frequently overlooked by the comolaintant). 2. Based on the alleged complaint notify by writing, by phone or in person, the suspected apbropriatorls), the SWCO, KSD, and other individuals or agencies wno may be affected or have a legitimate interest in the comolaint. The notification should indicate that the comolaint has been received but the comolaint form has not been filed and the comolaint has not yet been . verified. The suspected appropriators) shoula be advises: that r3 &Py ftsim al Hydrologists Pap 4 i If the complaint is validated and there is probable cause that their well 1s causing the interference that they are responsible for providing restoration of the domestic water supply, and that suspension of their permit will bi imposed until the conflict is resolved. 3. If based on the completed complaint form and evaluation by the regional staff cM complaint is valid and there is probably cause to suspect identified appropriators, submit the form and any supporting information, via a service request, to the water -- appropriations unit. 4. Upon receipt and review of the informtion a determination will be made regarding suspension of the high Capacity appropriators) or whether additional information is BOWL The Regional Hydrologist will is advised of action to 'be tak •- - -- For the interim, Ron Anderson has been assigned to coorlinate, monitor, and assist on interference complaints. E. Surface Water Allocation Plan (Attached). If you have ouestlins call Dave Milles or Jim Jaos. RDH /DBM: tjb cc: Steve Thorne Ron Margang Kent Lokkesmoe i /3V15 • Surface Water Allocation Plan Me should encourage appropriators to develop and manage their own allocation plan which will provide for a proportionate distribution of the available water among all users in the same priority class. Thy plan must include proposals for allocating the water which address the following: poi sit reduction in the amounts of appropriation so that each user would receive a proportionate amount of water for use; and possible restrictions in the timing of withdrawals so that each user would be allowed to withdraw a proportionate share of water for use over certain periods of time. If all the appropriators can not agree on an allocation plan we will allocate the available water above the protection limit based on a percent of riparian land owned by each penmittee and the statutory priorities of water use. In a water use conflict involving different water use priority classifications. The highest priority users must receive the first allocation of available water • above the protection limit. Any remaining available water should be allocated to the next succeeding priority users, until no further water is available. If the amount of available water is sufficient for ail users in the highest priority classification they can approorlate uo to their authorized rate. Allocation on a time or volume basis will be reouired if the available water is not sufficient to satisfy all of the hianest priority users. In general allocation is easier on a percent of tame oasis. The percent of pumping time or volume of water each per.«it:ee receives will be oased on following formula: R1oar ?an Acres `or PermItte_ Percent of Total Allocation 2 otai Riparian Acres for ail " 100 Permittees in the Same Priority Class Using the water Sour e Riparian land ownership must be de *_ermined using the procedure in Appendix V of 'the Water Appropriation Manual. The permittee should be notified to provide proof of land ownership to determine the numaer of riparian acres in order to be _. inelyded in an allocation plan. Proof of land ownership should include the legal description of the property and the numer of acres owned. _ The amount of water available can be determined based on measur stream flows end prior pumping rates. If there has been ne pumping, the available water is determined directly from. stream gage data or field measurements. If appropriators are currently p= ping, the available water is best determined by totaling the current pumping rate and aading the amount by which stream flow exceeds the protection limit. /36(• collecting t he uata twice a year . 1-101A09=. u 44--1 �..�14���.V .....�..r.. the District currently has enough data to be able to monitor adequately the inflow and outflow at Gray's Bay. Mr. Mahady explained that an increase in the number of samples taken during the year would still not provide a significant enough amount of data to be able to quantify the complete inflow and outflow of the lake during the course of the year. Following discussion, it was • moved by Lindley, seconded by Miller, to direct the staff to develop a proposed modification to the Operating Plan in order to conform to the current practice of collecting the data twice during the year, as additional data samples would not result in the availability of more meaningful information. Upon vote, the motion carried. The Board directed that Item 3C of the agenda concerning the Metropolitan Council's Evaluation of Lake and Stream Monitoring Programs be deferred to the next meeting of the Board. It was moved by Miller, seconded by Love, to authorize the chair and staff to develop a grant application to the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources for a restoration project of Peavey Pond by she in -situ treatment of bottom sediments. to reduce the introduction of phosphorus to the water column. Upon vote, the motion carried. The Engineer noted that the subject of augmentation wells to increase the level of Lake Minnetonka was recently addressed in the • Editorial Page of the ;fi Tribune. The staff has developed background information and analysis concerning this subject. Manager Miller, seconded by Manager Love, offered the following resolution based upon the staff report: BACKGROUND Lake !Minnetonka. The lake covers an area of roughly 22 square miles (14,000+ acres): It is the lower part of a 100- square mile watershed (Upper MC) under considerable development pressure. There are 130 miles of lakeshore around the bays and islands of Lake Minnetonka. The deepest part is over 90 feet deep.(elevation 839). Seven wells were constructed during the late 1930s to augment the level of Lake Minnetonka. The first well began pumping April 26, 1938. Pumpin^ from all of the wells ended on April 10, 1942. The • 13(0-1 electrical equipment were dismantled and removed, except for the Galpin Lake location where the pump and pump house remain. The transformers and electrical connection were removed from the Galpin Lake site. The wells are owned by Hennepin County and are located as shown below: Location Capacity Long Lake (2) 2000 gpm 3000 gpm Christmas Lake 2800 gpm Gleason Lake 1500 gpm Galpin Lake 3000 gpm Lake Minnetonka (2) Wayzata Bay 1000 gpm Gray's Bay 1500 gpm In order to calculate the effect of pumping groundwater into Lake Minnetonka, several factors must be taken into account. The present upper watershed lake levels would need to be determined, evaporation and infiltration must be estimated, and transmission losses through intervening wetlands and conveyance systems also must be calculated. Possible interference with existing wells in the aquifer, especially municipal water supplies, also must be considered. CLIMATOLOGY Evaporation - Precipitation Mean Evaporation (inches) Maple Plain 30 -Year Average Precipitation (inches) JAN 0.30 0.84 FEB 0.36 0.78 MAR 0.86 1.52 APR 1.75 2.35 MAY 3.00 3.93 JUN 4.00 4.83 JUL 5.70 4.65 AUG 5.60 4.09 SEP 4.40 2.83 OCT 3.00 2.06 NOV 1.35 1.46 DEC 0.39 0.86 Total 30.71* 30.2 (2.56 feet) (2.52 feet) Estimated from Minnesota Hydrology Guide. • 13&e LOwc &.- ---- - 1 acre -foot . 325,804 gallons. There are approximately 14,s of surface area. 300 acre requires ,,7, 04 gallons to raise the elevatmowhich foot- It re9 4 65899 of 2,500 gP or 28 yield 4,033 acre -feet feet of elevation in 1 Pumps actually on the sake had a capacity in or losses. i experiences year, not considering in County This 14 ,300-acre r-feet mean evaporation 1 year. n western 36,608 Long Lake roximately 320 acres of surface area. There are al P ear. requires 104,257,280 gallons moora8,066hacre- feetoinl1y It q of 5,000 gP Pumps had a cap acity 14 5 days to raise the elevation 1 foo It would take neglecting losses. eriences an 819 acre This 320 -acre lake exp -feet mean evaporation loss in 1 year. Christmas Lake There are approximately 265 acres of surface area. requires 66,338,060 gallons toy raise ehfe was 2,8 eteint1 year- foot- It q 00 gPm or , Pump capacity ise the elevation 1 foot, It would take 21.4 day s to ra lake experiences 678 acre -feet mean evaporation neglecting This 265 -8cre loss in 1 year- Gleason Lake There are approximately 190 acres of surface area. requires 61,902,760 gallons to raise the elein1foot. It q was 1,500 gpm or 2,420 acre -feet in 1 year. Pump capacity It would take 28.7 days to raise the elevation 1 foo , neglecting losses. periences 986 acre -feet me This 190 -acre lake ex an evaporation loss in 1 year. Galpin Lake r ately 45 acres of surface area There are app rox to raise the elevation 1 foot- It requires 14,661, 180 gallons m or 4,840 acre -feet in 1 Ye neglecting Pump capacity was 3,000 9P levation It would take 3.4 days to raise the e 1 foot, losses. cre -feet mean evaporation This 45 -acre lake experiences a 115 a loss in 1 year. • 0 i3&y All Pumps Combined capacity of all pumps was 14,800 gpm or 23,856 acre -feet in 1 year, or 1.7 feet of elevation on Lake Minnetonka. Significant transmission losses would cause the actual volume of water reaching Lake Minnetonka to be much less. . Accordingly, the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District notes that groundwater is becoming an increasingly precious resource, that the use of groundwater to increase the level of Lake Minnetonka has been noted as the lowest priority for groundwater usage by the DNR, and that the available information would indicate that the proposed wells are not capable of significantly increasing the level of Lake Minnetonka and would appear to be an unsound use of public resources. The MCWD shall make this information available to all interested parties, and invite any interested parties to provide additional information to the Board concerning this matter. Upon vote, the motion carried. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting of the Board of Managers_was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, John E. Thomas Secretary ZLPS /23(34) • 1-370 . VII. PLANS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (A) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ALLEVIATING ,POLLUTION The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is the State agency for determining and enforcing grater quality standards In the State. The Watershed District is a local unit of government which controls the land area needed to implement state agency orders. Nitrogen and phosphorous are among the princi- pal nutrient elements added by sewage effluent. Of the two, phosphorous is considered the limiting ele- ment as nitrogen is more readily available from other sources. Although tertiary sewage treatment processes are largely experimental and not yet con- sidered economically feasible for general use, and as long as it is not feasible to remove nutrient ele- ments from sewage to the degree necessary for limit- ing aquatic vegetation, consideration should be g'ven to discharging such effluent elsewhere than in the Lake Minnetonka basin. The following alternatives are recommended for consideration by the Pollution Control Agency: 1. No new sewage plants should be permitted to be constructed to discharge into Lake Minnetonka and existing plants should be prohibited from expanding. 2. Municipalities which can connect with the Southwest Sanitary Sewer District or Chaska municipal system should be ordered to do so. 3. Pending detailed plans for municipalities on the west side of Lake Minnetonka, a study should be made of the feasibility of disposal of sewage effluent through a spray irrigation system. Such a system would get rid of much of the phosphates and nitrates through plant growth on the land sprayed. Although a minor consideration, the system would have the additional merit of not exporting water from the basin. Water which would seep into the ground from spray irrigation would help recharge underground aquifers. Spray irri- gation would be practical only in areas with- out large existing developments. 4. Plans for providing sanitary sewer service to the Lake Minnetonka area should be implemented by government grants. 5. The MPCA should prohibit development in areas where sanitary sewer service is not available and revoke permits issued to municipalities which overload existing municipal systems. The by -pass of raw or inadequately treated sewerage to lakes and streams should not be an alternative to pro- viding adequate municipal waste disposal. Because of the limited exchange of water, halting the now of nutrients into Lake Minnetonka will not restore the lake. Nutrients already in the lake will have to be diluted or removed. The theoretical dilution time is great since much of the water is - - - • - & 8 y Orefn (I IP IdA located In sheltered Wets and bays and does not circulate freely and little is known of the quality of waters tributary to the lake. Augmentation of wa to the lake will not solve the problem unless water added is of substantially better chemic quality than that already in the lake. Additional pollution control steps which are recommended for immediate control of both bacterial and nutrient pollution are as follows: 1. Tertiary sewage treatment as a temporary measure, or at least phosphate removal, should be encouraged for all existing sewage treatment plants. 2. All housing developments adjacent to ex- Isting sanitary .ewer systems should be com- pelled to connect with them or to make com- parable provisions for sewage disposal. 3. Where soil conditions are unsuitable for on- lot disposal systems, building should be re- stricted unless adegLate sanitary facilities can be provided. 4. Studies should be made concerning removal of undesirable bottom sludge and weeds. 5. Companies which service septic tanks should be regulated with regard to discharge of their wastes and required to identify persistent areas waere on- the -lot sanitation facilities are in operable. 6. Boat toilet laws and regulations for dis of wastes from such toilets should be stric enforced. All marinas should be required to provide on -shore disposal facilities for both sanitary and solid wastes. 7. Complete land -fill standards should be adopted all existing landfill areas should be identified. 8. Barnyard pollution control standards set forth by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency should be adopted. 9. Sanitary facilities should be provided at all public access points to lakes and streams. 10. Strong, enforceable, uniform municipal regu- lations prohibiting littering in all areas of the watershed should likewise be adopted. 11. Mandatory State certification of sewage treatment plant operators should be re- quired. (B) PROJECTS FOR AUGMENTING THE WATER SUPPLY OF LAKE MINNETONKA I. Crow River Diversion Projects Proposals to divert water from the Crow River to Lake Minnetonka and Minnehaha Creek date fro the drought period of the 1930s. At that time engineering study was made of several possible di- version routes which are shown on Map 15. All of these routes would require a dam, or dams, and storage reservoirs on the Crow River in order to 37/ 56 i L ROCKFORD WAVERIY LAKE LAKA LAKE SARAN 12 WAVERLr FOUNTAIN LAKE LAKE SARAH -LAKE INDEPENDENCE ROUTE { . D E L A NO L NN DEPENRtOKE Ml10 LAKE - 12 RICE LAKE - OX C RIVER FORK YOKE LAKE ROUTE RICE CROW PAINTER LAK CREEK WATERTOWN Ox YOKE LAK OAK LAKE VVVVVV MUD OUTCII�ARE LAKE WNALETAIL LAKE • SWEDE LAKE s LAKE •. ,. MINPETON K SIX MILE CREEK © ROUTE NALS PROPOSED DAM DAY o Q o LAKE MAYER PARLEY LAKE fN PROPOSED �� WA STIEGER LAKE RESERVOIR � I P VICTORUI �• J WACONIAj s MYDES LAKE EAGLE LAKE MINNEHAH4 CREEK WATE HEO RICE LAKE � CROW RIVER YO DIVERSION SCHEMES AMERIERI TIGER CA YOUNG AMERICA LAKE , LAKE E.A. HICKOK a ASSOCIATES �ARN[s LAKE �� CONSULTING HYDROLOGISTS 3 . RAND NORWOOD COLOGNE WAYZATA , MINNESOTA LAKE MAP NO. IS 57 3 provide usable quantities of water for the Minnehaha Creek watershed when the need arises. The alternate routes are as follows: (a) Lake Sarah — Lake Independence Route (h) Rice Lake — Ox Yoke Lake Route (c) Six Mile Creek Route Of these three possibilities, the last seems most favorable. The first two routes, one starting near Rockford and the other at Watertown, would employ pumping to lift diverted water over the divide to Lake Minnetonka. The third route would employ gravity flow to divert water from a dam on the Crow River near Mayer to Mud Lake and Six Mile Creek which empties into Halsteads Bay of LakeMinne- tonkr:. The Six Mile Creek route has two sub - variations, one through Swede Lake and the other through Goose Lake. These routes were surveyed and estimates made of excavation quantities and structural design in a 1935 engineering report by Wirth, Norling and Lathrop. The 1935 report estimated construction costs at approximately 5660,000. The Swede Lake Route would require 3,290,000 cubic yards of channel exca- vation and 74,500 cubic yards of rill for dikes. The Goose Lake route would require 5,005,000 cubic yards of channel excavation and 38.260 cubic yards of rill for dikes. In addition to excavation and dikes, construction of a dam with control structures, flowage easements, right -of -way, bridge construction at high- way and rai!way crossings and sewer and utility line replacements would be required. Legal problems which could arise with regard to downstream riparian owners was only briefly investi- gated in the 1935 report. Another legal problem which would have to be resolved before any Crow River diversion project could be undertaken is the matter of obtaining legal permission to divert water from one watershed to another. in the past, it has not been the practice in Minnesota to grant such permission. On the basis of the 935 report, it is question- able whether there would be sufficient water in the Crow River to provide a significant surplus for di- version to Lake Minnetonka. Since the 1935 study, however, more than 30 years of additional flow records of the Crow River have been accumulated. It Is recommended that the average sustained flow- rate of the Crow River be re- computed with this additional data and that the Crow River diversion proposals be re- ev- luated. An investigation also should he made of the quality of water in the Crow River at different times of the year to ensure that the proposed diversion would provide water of suitable chemical and bio- logical quality. The various diversion projects also should be re- surveyed to determine utility lines, bridges, houses, etc., which have been erected along the proposed routes since the 1935 study was made. In addition, a cost analysis of each project should be made to reflect current construction methods and expenses, as well as the problem of acquiring flowage /373 ;R easements and right -of -way along routes on which land values have increased substantially since 1935. 2. Mississippi River Diversion Project Another river diversion project for maintaining the level of Lake Minnetonka would utilize the Mississippi River. Beginning at a point near Dayton, Minn rota, water would be diverted south to Lake Minnetonka. No detailed engineering study is known to have been made of this possibility and there are a number of problems which are apparent without further investigation. One would be the matter of obtaining right -of -way. This right-of -way would be far longer and more costly than any required for the various Crow River diversion projects. Another is the amount of water in the Mississippi River during drought periods. At such times, the entire flow of the Mississippi is needed by the metropolitan area for sewage dilution, water systems, recreation and other needs. It might be possible to overcome this obstacle by increasing the flow in the Mississippi through fluctuation of the Mississippi headwater reservoirs. 3. Wells Pumping from wells is a method which could be used to add water to Lake Minnetonka, as has been done in the past. Earlier in this report, it was pointed out that existing wells for this purpose have not been operated since 1959 and would require re- conditioning before use. The cost of mechanical, electrical and structural repairs necessary for re- conditioning these wells is estimated at approxi- mately $90,000. Aithough there were past objections in areas where some of the wells are located because of inter- ference with private wells, it should be noted that municipal water is available in the vicinity of three of the six wells. These areas, therefore, are no longer dependent on private wells. More suitable locations than the existing well sites might be found for a number of reasons. As indicated earlier, two of the existing wells contributed very little to Lake Minnetonka when last used in 1959 since most of the water from these pumps re- mained in subsidiary lakes. If the pumping stations were located on western lakes and streams tributary to Lake Minnetonka, the wells could be used to supply water for recreational purposes and to maintain adequate levels in other bodies of water. In addition, since the western por- tion of the watershed is less developed, it is possible to rind suitable well sites in undeveloped areas where there would be no interference with existing private wells. 4. Temporary Storage Reservoirs The problem of maintaining the level of Lake Minnetonka is essentially one of finding a way to compensate for climatic variations in water distri- bution within the area. In the spring, the lake usually receives ample water from snow melt run -off and rainfall whereas in late summer and fall the lake usually receives less precipitation and much less run -off. LJ r I t •j I 1 1 I i 1 i J 7 7 7 7 7 One way of stabilizing the level of Lake Minne- tonka would be to temporarily impound water in storage reservoirs when it is abundant and release it into the lake when needed. Excess water could be stored in swamps and other low areas rather than expended over Grays Bay dam and thereby reduce! the flood potential in the lower watershed. This water could then be released to the lake gradually to re- place surface evaporation and normal flow over the dam. This idea has the additional merit of adding some water to the ground -water table through seepage from swamps or other ponding areas. This is the process by which ground -water reservoirs are most readily recharged. In an urbanized area, low spots are usually drained or filled, storm drainage is designed for rapid run-off and little excess moisture is retained in the area, thereby decreasing the amount of water available for natural ground -water recharge. • 70 7 There are two principal difficulties in perma- nently maintaining reservoir areas. First, as an area becomes urbanized, land is usually considered toa valuable to be devoted to water storage and economic pressures arise for the development of low areas where the prospect of future returns appears to offset added development cost. Second, once a swamp is flooded, people often consider it a lake. Lakeshore homes or other developments soon appear and strong resistance develops against low water levels, especially if these levels are lowered to a point where the area is in danger of becoming a swamp again. When this happens, the area no longer serves as an effective water management tool but, instead, becomes another water management problem. Unless the water level in a reservoir area can be deliberately fluctuated, the reservoir no longe serves the purpose for which it was intended. Map 2 illustrates temporary flood areas around Lake Minnetonka, some of which could be improved and used as temporary storage ponds to reserve water for the lake. These areas are not collectively large enough to maintain the lake level without other measures but they could be a useful supplement and would also assiL in controlling high water in conjunction with other water management steps. Map 2 illustrates only those temporary water storage areas of ten acres or larger. These areas should be studied in detail to see if it would be economically feasible to expand their capacity through dredging and control their outflow by diking. Ways of pro- tecting these areas from possible pollution should also be studied. Map 16 depicts the temporary water storage areas which it is inost important to conserve at this time. In general, most of those areas adjacent r,o Lake Minnetonka or other bodies of surface water would be more efficient as fish and wildlife habitat if sound water and land conservation practices were insti- tuted. (C) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS ,Flood- control methods must be designed with some knowledge of the magnitude and frequency of floods on the streams in question. btream•gaging records are useful in determining the flows, stage and recurrence interval of floods If measurements have been made for a sufficient length of time to permit valid analysis. As stated earlier, gaging records for a continuous period of eleven years and miscellaneous records for six years are available for a station on Minnehaha Creek at Minnetonka Mills. Little is known of the variation of flows in other major streams in the Distr -A. A basic hydrologic data collection, network has been established by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. This network requires immediate expansion, however, to adequately cover the entire area and to permit the fullest utilization of flow forecasting techniques. It is the objective of the Managers to provide the means of designing regulatory systems that a-ill reduce flood damage, maintain a more desirable flow in Minnehaha Creek for recreational purposes and conserve water, both in Lake Minnetonka and other useful lakes in the watershed, for improved lake level control and benefits to wildlife. Flood- control measures must consider the effects of each type of flooding and provide for each control separately and in combination. In order to reduce long - period flooding caused by outflow from Lake Minnetonka or flow from Minne- tonka combined with local rainfall, provisions would be required either to regulate the level of the lake, and thereby also regulate the flow in Minnehaha 'T Creek until the effects of local downstream flooding have subsided, or to institute integrated flood-control plans which will divert flood waters to Minneapolis lakes, and to storm -drain tunnels if necessary, to prevent flooding around those lakes. A graph showing flow magnitude and frequency based on the partial duration series for flows over 40 cfs is shown in Figure 10. A longer period of record that would include the drought years from 1930 to 1941 would change the recurrence interval of high- magnitude flows. For de- sign purposes, the graph shown provides a realistic safety factor. A comprehensive analysis of flow magnitudes and suggested flood regulation procedures, based on storm recurrence intervals of 3, 10, 50 and 100 years from Figure 11, is outlined in Table 21. Lake level changes and peak stream -flow values for conditions No. I and 2 are based on precipitation run -off relations calculated from records furnished by the United States Geological Survey and the Min- neapolis Park Board. Lake level changes and peak flow rates in Minnehaha Creek for condition No. 3 are projected from available data and represent an estimate of the anticipated response to the 24 -hour precipitation storms indicated. Flood regulation procedures would require regu- lation of flow from Lake Minnetonka. Such control could be accomplished at the Interstate Highway 494 crossing of Minnehaha Creek as discussed under 0-i- Stream Storage Reservoirs. 59 137)y MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION April 23, 1990 Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Commissioners Geoff Michael, Jerry Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Bill Thal, Coun- cil Representative Liz Jensen, City Manager Ed Shukle, City Plan- ner Mark Koegler, and Secretary Peggy James. Those absent and excused were: Commissioners Frank Welland and Bill Voss. Absent was Commissioner Ken Smith. The following citizens were also present: Jon Nelson and Reed Beck ler. MINUTES: MOTION mode by Clapsaddle, seconded by Mueller to ap- prove the Planning Commission Minutes of April 9, 1990 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS: a. Case No. 90 -911: Reed Beckler. 55XX Three Points Blvd., Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park, PID 813- 117 -24 -22 0266, MINOR SUBDIVISION. Commissioner Mueller removed himself from the Commission since he had a personal Interest in the case. • City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed the applicants request to subdivide the subject property into two parcels. The proposed Parcel A will have 6,081 square feet and Parcel B will have 6,391 square feet. Both parcels have frontage on Three Points Blvd., however due to topography, will use the existing driveway ease- ment which is on Outlot A for access. The proposed Parcel A has a driveway easement which crosses Parcel 8 at the south end of the lot. Koegler stated that the Development Plan for Parcel A dated 4 -3 -90 is unacceptable; there is not adequate maneuvering room between the garage and the east property line. Staff recommended approval of the minor subdivision for Lot 1, Block 1, Alexander Park as proposed on the Lot Split Survey dated 4 -3 -90 subject to the following conditions: I. The building placement for the home and garage for Parcel A shall be modified as generally described herein to allow adequate vehicular access to the garage area. 2. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the City En- gineers report, as follows: a. A manhole will need to be constructed over the end of the existing 6" sewer service, then separate 4 service • can be installed for each unit. /376 Planning Commission Minutes April 23, 1990 • Page 2 b. The location of the water services appear to be accept- able. Curb stops will need to be installed at the east line of Parcel B for each service. C. The City should have a guarantee that utility services will be provided for both parcels before the lot split is recorded at Hennepin County. This can be ac- complished in a number of ways such as actual Installation; escrow money, bond, etc. The applicant should submit either an estimated cost or a bona fide bid so the amount of surety can be determined. The location of the easements were clarified. The commission discussed the lack of space for visitor parking. Options for placement of the house on Parcel A was discussed. It was deter- mined that a building permit for Parcel A will not be issued un- til the site plan meets staff requirements. The commission discussed the pros and cons of building two detached single family homes rather than a two family home or duplex. The applicant commented that the homes being built will be modest in 4alue due to the surrounding properties (PDQ, Fina • property, and the pump house). Meyer commented that he is opposed to creating new 6,C00 square foot lots with so many easements and limited visitor parking. The applicant, Beckler, commented that this proposed subdivision complies with City ordinances. MOTION made be Thal, seconded by Clapsaddle, to approve the City Planner's recommendation for approval with con - ditions. Motion carried 4 to i (those in favor were: Clapsaddle, Tlial, Jensen, and Michael; those opposed were: Meyer). This case will appear before the City Council on May 8, 1990. Parking Stall Size - Discussion City Planner, Mark Koegler, explained to the commission that he would like to know if they feel a change in Mound's parking stall size requirements is warranted. Currently, Mound requires 10 by 20 foot parking stalls. A number of parking stall variances have been approved in previous years, most of which allowed 9 by 18 foot stall sizes. Koegler reviEwed a survey conducted by the City of Fridley identifying current requirements in 22 area • communities; most of which allow 9 by 20 or 9 by 18 foot stalls. 137(0 �t . Planning Commission Minutes April 23, 1590 Page 3 The commission determined that they would like to review the num- ber of stalls required and the stall size requirement as a package. Larger stalls are preferred by the Commission, however for certain types of businesses and uses, this may vary. Koegler commented that the City's requirements for the number of spaces Is standard. This issue will be addressed at a future workshop meeting. Housing Maintenance Reaulatlons for Rental ProDertles The Commission continued review of this draft beginning at Sec- tion 319:20, as follows: 319:25, Subd. 1. The percentage of exterior surface allowed to be left unpainted or lacking a protective coating or exterior surface was changed from 25% to 10'11 in the last two sentences of this section. 319:25, Subd. 2. The following is to be added to the end of this section: "Every openable window shall be supplied with sixteen (16) mesh screens during the insect season." The Commission questioned if "sixteen (16) mesh screens" is a standard size. 319:25, Subd. rL Should be amended as follows: "All fences sop - p+ fed by t+w--owner - -cxt -the - prep : +ses - and- e- 14 --Fenc. a - -er*_ == = -by -an eeeupant- ors - the - 1>r+em , I shall consist of chain link, wood, masonry or other decay resistant material. Fences shall be main- tained in good condition by the owner Materials, . . ." 319:25, Subd. 6. The following should be added to the end of the paragraph: "if approximately 10% or more of the total exterior surface is unpainted or lacks a protective coating or is deter- mined by the Compliance Official to be deteriorated, the surface shall have a protective covering applied." 319:35, Subd. 1. A typo was noted in the 5th line, as follows: " . . shall consist of locksed building entrance,1 or foyer . " In the 9th sentence, the word "cylinders" should be replaced with "devices." 319:40, Subd. 3. it was determined that the heading for this subdivision should be deleted, and the balance of the paragraph added to Subdivision 2; as follows: "Subd. 2. Ventilation. All h a b i t a b l e rooms . . . . four ( 4 ) square feet. Hab +tab +e - Room - Vent + +atfonr Every bathroom and water closet com- Partmentr end tvery-- F� - and - tat44- ity- i%oom,, -shall contain at least 50% of the light and ventilation requirement . . . " 319:42, Subd. 1. The Commission agreed that 100 ampere was too strict, therefore, 60 ampere shalt be used. /37'7 Planning Commission Minutes April 23, 1990 • Page 4 319:42, Subd. 2. The Commission agreed to change "400 square feet" to " 600 sqL a feet." 319:47 The Commission agreed that this section was too restric- tive for persons with summer cabins, or persons who rent a house for a short period. It was determined the following would be added in the first paragraph: "Winterizing. Owne.-s of residen- tial rental properties built before 1976, and th -.t are occupied from November I through April 1 are required to comply with energy- efficiency standards ." There was discussion of what constitutes a "seasonal" home, and do they have to comply with this section. 319 :47, last paragraph Since the term "duplex" is not listed in the definitions, the first sentence in the: last paragraph should read: ". . . units, including apartment buildings, doptexes s +mg +e one and two family homes." Any other areas where the term "duplex" is used is to be amended in the same manner. 319:50, Subd. 1. The first sentence should read: "Every occupied • floor above the first story used fox - Ix�- eeeepaney shall have access to " Also, within the last sentence, the Commission questioned what determines an "occupant load of 10 or less." City Council Representative Report Jensen reviewed the City Council meeting of April 10, 1990 am the agenda for the meeting of April 24, 1990. 140TION made by Thal seconded by Clapsawidle to adjourn the meeting at 11:04 p.m. Chair, Bill Meyer Attest: • 3 7,r MINUTES - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - 1PRIL 19 1990 The meeting was called to order at 7 AM. Members present: Chic • Remien, Paul Meisel, Mark Brewer, Tim Kenealy, Ben Marks, and Fred Guttormson. Absent: Mayor Steve Smith. Also present: Mark Koegler, VanDoren Hazard and Stallings; Rusty Fifield and Becky Yan13ch of Public Financial Systems; City Manager Ed Shukle and Finance Director John Norman. Upon motion by Guttormson, seconded by Brewer, and carried unanimously, the minutes of the March 29, 1990 meeting were approved. Rusty Fifield and Mark Koegler reviewed highlights of the Land Use and Financing sections. The major focus of the discussion was held on the implementation plan. Fifield made it clear that the budget for the project had already been exceeded. However, he also stated that within the scope of services, the consultants were still obligated to have one more meeting with the Commission and a presentation to the City Council. There was a concern about the need for more time to review the information within the report and to discuss implementation. Thus, it was the consensus to schedule two special meetings without the consultants at which time the Commission will discuss the findings of the report and implementation and /or direction. Special meetings are scheduled for Tuesday, May 15, 1990 and Thursday, May 31, 1990, both at 7 AM in the City council chambers. In June, VHS and PFS will be called back in to meet one more time with the Commission to define the implementation plan and then a meeting will be held with the City Council to present the report. There being no other business, the meeting adjourned at 8:50 AM. Respectfully submitted, Ed hukle City Manager ES:ls • • /37q asocin of metropolitan municipalities 1990 ANN ANNUAL MEETING WHEN: WEDNESDAY, MAY 16, 1990 1"M APR 3 01990 WHERE: MC GUIRES INN 1201 West County Road E Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 5:30 P.M. 6.30 P.M. 7 : 3 __ ocial Hour Western Deluxe Buffet Annual Business 41 Cash Bar) (BBQ Ribs, Glazed Ham, and Meeting Ranch Style Chicken, Western Potatoes, salads and veggies, dessert and more) Cost: $20.00 Per Person SPOUSES, SIGNIFICANT OTHERS, AND GUESTS ARE WELCOME 1. DINNER RESERVATIONS TO C?ROL WILLIAMS (227 -4008) BY NO LATER THAA FRIDAY, MAY 11. (Reservations are not needed if you only plan to attend the business meeting portion - Please channel reservations through your city Manager /Administrator office). 2. PLEASE COME AND PROVIDE YOUR INPUT AND REACTION TO THE ENCLOSED MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE REPORT CONCERNING THE FUTURE DIRECTION OF THE AMM. SEE MAP AND MEETING AGENDA ON REVERSE DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This notice has been mailed to Mayors, Councilmembers and Managers /Administrators • individually. / ��so 183 university avi -li - , i-,' 'A G;,m! rninnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008 • BUSINESS MEETING AGENDA 1. Welcome To Arden Hills. 2. Recognize Retiring Officers and Board Directors. 3. Mission and Membership Services Report by Kevin Frazell, Administrator, Cottage Grove. 4. President's Annual Report: Walt Fehst. S. Annual Election of Officers and Directors. A. Report of Nominating Committee - Gary Bastian, Past President. B. Election (President, Vice - President and Directors). 6. Comments of the President Elect. 7. Legislative Report - WHAT HAPPENED ON MAJOR ISSUES. S. Adjourn. ARDEN HILLS ROAD W J O Z J W Z M :T ►Aul JA 1-6% to imngton Ave. Est, South % M&. • 0 /3S► • ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REPORT OF THE 1990 MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE TASK FORCE MEMBERS Kevin Frazell, City Administrator, Cottage Grove, Task Force Chair Mentor "Duke" Addicks, Legislative Liaison, Minneapolis Bob Benke, Mayor, New Brighton Gary Jackson, City Manager, Coon Rapids James D. Prosser, City Manager, Richfield Marilyn Corcoran, Mayor, Dayton Nancy Jorgenson, Councilmember, Fridley Tom Spies, Councilmember, Bloomington Katherine Trummer, Mayor, South St. Paul Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley Bob Long, Councilmember, St. Paul Lu Stoffel, Mayor, Hastings • i3 aJI. M met I?a n i c' iira i Ne 9 April 27, 1990 Dear Mayors, Councilmembers, and Managers: Enclosed is a draft of the Mission and Membership Services Task Force final report recommendations. The report contains some very significant recommendations which will require careful consideration by the membership. To give you adequate time to review these recommendations prior to the Annual Meeting, we are sending this report to you before the final Task Force review. The Task Force will meet one more time to go over this draft, so there -may be a few changes but probably not major ones. Please read the report and consider the recommendations. We would like to have a good discussion at the Annual Meeting to obtain your input to establish the future directions of the AMM. Sincerely, Kevin Frazell, Chair • I38') 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008 • INTRODUCTION The League of Metropolitan Municipalities (LMM) was originally created in 1967, as a subsection and affiliate organization of the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC). The impetus for forming the LMM was the creation of the Metropolitan Council, and the growth in importance and power of the regional operating agen- cies. It was felt that the cities of the seven- county metropolitan area needed an organization, separate from but complementary to the LMC, to interact with those agencies. In 1974, the LMM merged with the Suburban.League of Municipali- ties to become the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM). As the needs of AMM member cities have changed over the years, the Board of Directors has strived to keep the organization relevant. During the late 1970's and throughout the 1980's, the Association's focus has broadened from strictly "metropolitan" affairs, to protecting the interests of member cities in state- wide issues with unique impacts for the metropolitan area. The most prominent recent example is the distribution of state aids to local governments. In 1984, the Association convened its first Mission and Membership Services Task Force to do an in depth study of the AMM and recommend needed changes. The major concern of that Task Force was the proliferation of splinter municipal lobbying groups within the metropolitan area. The 1984 Task Force was concerned that the AMM could lose its viability as an umbrella organization for all metro- politan cities in the face of a growing number of smaller groups with differ- ences of opinion on the allocation of state aid resources. The group made 13 recommendations, all of which have since been implemented, with the exception of expanding she staff. The final recommendation of the 1984 report was that the Mission and Membership Services review process should be revisited every five years. Fortunately, predictions of any demise of the Association were ill- founded. Since the 1984 report was issued, five additional communities (West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Arlen Hills, Blaine and Shoreview) have joined AM1. The Member- ship now includes 68 metropolitan cities, covering over 90 percent of the popu- lation in the seven - county area. This is an all -time high for the Association. Ironically, one of the splinter groups which existed in 1984, the Municipal Caucus, has since gone out of existence after concluding that its aims and purposes were not that different from those or AMM. The meetings of this year's Mission and Membership Services Task Force, however, have taken place within the context of an increasing split between the metropo- litan area and Greater Minnesota over taxation, local government aid, and other state fiscal policies. The Task Force has studied carefully how the AMM might be a more effective and united voice at the legislature on behalf of all cities in the seven - county metropolitan area. The Task Force has also considered the Association's relationship to the League of Minnesota Cities, and how it might help strengthen that organization in serving the interests of all cities • throughout Minnesota. - 1 - 13 sPy At the same time, the Task Force has not neglected the original focus of AMM, which was to monitor and work with the metropolitan agencies. Of particular concern is the observation that as MIM has become involved in more and more statewide issues, the staff has had a very noticeable decrease in the amount of time available to be spent in the area of metropolitan affairs. The Task Force feels strongly that the AMM should not only correct its decreased activity in metropolitan oversight, but should actually become proactive in helping set the regional agenda. Richfield City Manager Jim Prosser and Golden Valley Councilmember Larry Bakken have drafted a revised "PURPOSES" Statement for incorporation in the Association bylaws. This document, attached as Appendix A, has been adopted by the Task Force as a recommended mission statement for the Association. In a nutshell, the recommended mission is well - summarized in the first item of that Purposes Statement: To serve as the exclusive and primary representative of the collec- tive interests oTITT 0 — eTropolitan c! ties on metropolitan -wide and statewide issues wit' unique metropolitan significance. To further that goal, the Task Force has made several observations and numerous recommendations for specific actions to enhance the success and performance of the Association. Those are set forth by topical area as follows, and prefaced by brief background material. During its deliberations the Task Force received input and advice from a number of resource persons. They are listed in Appendix B. The Task Force wishes to express its gratitude for their time and counsel. • /385 - 2 - RELATIONSHIP TO THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES As indicated in the introduction, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities was originally created as a subgroup of the League of Minnesota Cities and remains in that status today. As such, we are the only organization entitled to an ex officio (with voting privileges) seat on the League Board of Directors. We are considered an "affiliate organization" of the League for the purposes of adopting legislative policy. The Association offices are located on the first floor of the LMC building. Cities in the seven- county metropolitan area comprise approximately 15 percent of the LMC membership, but because of their size pay about one -half of the LMC dues. The Task Force met with LMC President Millie McCloud, as well as Executive Director Don Slater. A member of the Task Force, New Brighton Mayor Bob Benke, currently serves as vice president of the League. The Task Force observations are that the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have maintained a very positive working relationship. Despite the split in the LMC membership over local government aid policies, the AMM has never taken a legislative position in direct opposition to any adopted policy of the League. In fact, LMC and AMM lobbying staffs work cooperatively in many areas of policy agreement (such as pay equity,- labor relations law and tax increment financing). Officials from GreAter Minnesota have raised concerns about the relationship between the League and AMM. Specifically, it has been questioned whether the AMM should have the ex officio seat on the Board, and whether the relationship between the staffs of the two organizations has been compromisingly close. Due to these concerns, as well as our own concerns about the effectiveness of AMM as an affiliate organization of the League, the Task Force considered carefully whether the AMM should be incorporated as a separate entity. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Because of division in its membership, the LMC has been neutralized from effective lobbying on some critical issues like local government aid. This means that the AMM must become more vocal and assertive on behalf of its member cities in these policy areas. At the same time, we wish to support the efforts of LMC to bring together its membership on divisive issues, and we encourage AMM member city officials to become more actively involved in the LMC, creating a metropolitan constituency group and perspective within the LMC. 2. We recommend that the Association not be incorporated as a legal entity separate from the League of Minnesota Cities. We wish to be supportive of the LMC, and to encourage AMM member city officials to become more active in the League. We feel that this goal can be best accomplished in our current status as subgroup of the League. • - 3 - /3g 3. We recommend that the AMM reject any requests that it give up the ex officio seat on the LMC Board. The Task Force feels strongly that we have lived up to the guidelines and spirit under which we are an affiliate organization (i.e. not taking contrary lobbying positions). We would support other organizations which might wish to come into the LMC under the same rules and guidelines as the AMM, including the designation of Board seats for such organizations. 4. We recommend that, as long as possible, the AMM offices remain in the LMC building. We feel that to move from the building would undermine much of the cooperative working relationship that exists between the staffs of the two organizations. It would also be expensive for the AMM to acquire the overhead and support services that it currently purchases from LMC. However, expansion of the AMM staff may make a move from the existing LMC building unavoidable. 5. We recommend that the AMM Board and Membership focus its agenda by refer- ring more of the non- divisive statewide issues to the LMC for lobbying on behalf of all member cities, both metropolitan and Greater Minnesota. • /ail - 4 - LOBBYING Legislative policy adoption and lobbying have become the major focus for the Association, growing steadily over the years. When the Association was formed in 1974, it had two standing policy committees and 35 legislative policies. Today the Association has five standing committees, and the membership has adopted over 100 legislative policies for the current biennium. In addition, several ad huc study committees for specialized topics (i.e. land use legisla- tion, metropolitan significance rules, group homes) have been formed in the past few years. Intrusion by the legislature into local affairs has increased dramatically in recent years. At the same time, other municipal lobbying groups, most notably the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, have aggressively promoted tax poli- cies that are detrimental to the collective interests of the metropolitan area. Consequently, the AMM lobbyists have been challenged to accomplish more and more at the legislature, without any significant increase in resources. Legislators with whom the Task Force met described cur lobbying staff as com- petent and well respected. At the same time, the legislators admitted that the aggressive, and sometimes even abrasive tactics used by other municipal lobbying groups have probably led to more success in accomplishing their agendas. In response to these concerns, the AMM for the first time hired contract lobbyists during the 1990 session. Legislators expressed their frustration with the increasing regionalism of city lobbying groups, and urged us to show a concern for the entire State at the same • time we more actively pursue the interests of the metropolitan cities. It was also suggested that having a better aata base for lobbying would be helpful in pressing the AMM position. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should seek to be seen as the organization with the authority and credibility to speak on behalf of aTT cities in the seven - county metropoli- tan area. 2. The AMM has become "spread too thin" in the number of policy issues it is lobbying, and needs to limit active involvement to three types of issues: a) Issues of concern only to metropolitan cities - i.e. interaction with Metropolitan Council and operating agencies, Chapter 509 Watershed Management Organizations, etc. b) Statewide legislation with unique impacts in the metropolitan area - i.e. land use, solid waste, tax increment financing, etc. c) Statewide issues where the interests of the metropolitan area may be different than, and at times even contrary tu, those in the remainder of the State - i.e. local government aid formulas • -5- /3 Coe Specific suggestions for limiting our most active legislative agenda items to these topics is included in the section on committees and the policy adoption process. 3. The AMM's lobbying efforts in the property tax area have been hindered by lack of immediate access to a computerized property tax model. The Task Force recommends that the AMM Board of Directors closely monitor the progress of the league of Minnesota Cities in developing a property tax model that is useable and immediately accessible to all cities. If this proves inadequate to meet our needs, the AMM membership should be prepared to bear the expense of developing its own property tax modeling system. 4. The AMM should be proactive, and not ,just reactive in its legislative posi- tions. For example, the AMM has never produced its own recommended formula for distribution of local government aids, and should consider doing so. 5. At the same time we become more proactive, we should also stay on the high road, adopting positions that reflect responsible public policy for the entire State of Minnesota. 6. AMM member city officials should become more active and involved in the League of Minnesota Cities and its policy study committees. In some cases, we may find ourselves lobbying the LMC, rather than the State legislature, to pursue particular policy positions that are of common interest to all cities in the metroplitaii area. 7. The AMM should increase the amount of time it spends one -on -one with legislators explaining AMM positions. We should also hold metro)olitan legislators more accountable to the AMM agenda by developing and publish- • ing a "scorecard" following each legislative session. 8. In pursuing our legislative agenda, we should "pace ourselves", realizing that lobbying is an ongoing process. Policy positions should be pursued not only for immediate gains, but for maintaining a long -term positive relationship with the State government and with the League of Minnesota Cities. • X391 - 6 - COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND POLICY ADOPTION PROCESS Tf;e Association currently follows a procedure whereby potential legislative • policies are brought forth and considered for adoption in the five standing policy committees (revenues, metropolitan agencies, transportation, housing and economic development, general legislation). As indicated earlier, the Associ- ation currently has over 100 adopted legislative policies. The policies have been divided into categories as to level of effort in lobbying. The AMM now finds itself actively involved in issues that are not limited in interest to the metropolitan area, even where our positions are similar to those of cities in Greater Minnesota. The best recent example is pay equity, where the AMM position is almost ider;tical to that of the League of Minnesota Cities. Yet because of the high visibility and strong feelings surrounding this issue, many member cities expected the AMM staff to be active in lobbying on this issue. There is also the dilemma of issues that are of interest to a single city, or a limited number of cites. The AMM Board and staff have attempted to be respon- sive to the needs of each member city, but a question is raised as to whether it is fair to take time and resources away from issues that arie of more importance to the broader membershii. The Task Force discussed at length what to do about issues that are divisive among our own members, for example fiscal disparities or funding for combined sewer overflow abatement. A majority of the committee concluded that the AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on these issues, as it would be left neutralized on issues of high importance to a large number of city offi- cials and thereby foster the growth of still more splinter groups. • Finally, the Task Force examined the five standing policy committees, concluding that they are working well and that none should be eliminated. In fact, it was speculated that as new social and legislative problems appear (i.e. the drug crisis) there will likely be a need for additional standing or ad hoc committees. The Task Force further suggests that there may be utility in having a broad - based "futures" committee to simply help the organization anticipate and be prepared for pending issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Association needs to focus most of its resources and effort on the few issues of very highest priority to the entire membership. At the same time, the AMM should not narrow its agenda to the point that it loses the interest and support of its broad base of cities. 2. In order to accommodate the legitimate interests of all member cities, we recommend that AMM create an "endorsed" category of policies. These would be policies of interest to a limited number of cities, or those where the League of Minnesota Cities or some other group might reasonably be expected to adequately represent the interests of metropolitan cities. With the AMM "endorsement ", the AMM would be officially on record as supporting these • policies, but not actively involved in lobbying or initiating legislation. - 7 - 1390 3. The existing Legislative Coordinating Committee (LCC) should be the "screening and dividing" group for determining lobbying priorities and deciding which policies will be "endorsed" and referred to other groups (i.e. LMC) for lobbying. 4. The AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on issues that are controversial among ins own membership. While such avoidance may "buy peace" in the short term, in the long term it neutralizes the effec- tiveness of the organization, undermining its credibility with legislators and causing the proliferation of splinter groups surrounding special issues. The AMM should make use of dispute resolution services, such as the Office of Dispute Resolution in the State Planning Agency and the Mediation Center, a private non - profit community mediation service based in St. Paul. We recommend that the Association strive to achieve real consensus on divisive issues, and not merely concurrence through a majority vote. Committee chairs as well as Board members might benefit from professional training in mediation resolution. 5. The two- thirds majority vote requirement for adoption of legislative policies should be retained. • • / 3q/ - 8 - OTHER METROPOLITAN LOBBYING GROUPS The Task Force met with Minnetonka City Manager Jim Miller, regarding the Muni- cipal Legislative Commission, and Brooklyn Park Mayor Jim Krautkramer• repre- senting the Northern Mayors' Association. The Task Force observation is that the AM hts been able to form effective and cooperative relationships with these Specialized groups, and that they should not be seen as a threat to the ANN. As indicated in the introduction, an additional splinter group which existed in 1984, the Municipal Caucus, has since gone out of existence. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. We recommend that the ANN strive to be the organization seen as the legiti- mate voice to speak on behalf of all cities in the seven - county metropoli- tan area, while recognizing the leg timate need of some breakoff groups for special purposes. 2. The AW should not perceive existing specialized groups as a threat, but attempt to maintain a cooperative and mutually supportive relationship. 3. We recommend that the ANN maintain its openness to 11 cities in the seven - county metropolitan area, resisting any impetus to limit membership to a more limited group (i.e. suburban caucus). • • . - / 300%, RELATIONSHIP TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND OPERATING AGENCIES As indicated in the Introduction, monitoring and oversight of the Metropolitan Council and regional operating agencies was the original focus of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Yet in recent years, involvement with the Council and agencies has suffered appreciably as the AMM staff has had to spend more and more time supporting the work of its own committees and lobbying on statewide issues. In fact, the staff indicated that it now has almost no time for any involvement with the Metropolitan Council during the legislative session. The AMM currently nominates to the Metropolitan Council eight names for appoint- ment to the Transportation Advisory Board. The Association actually appoints ten to the Transportation Advisory Committee. That s,stem seems to be working well. In contrast, the AMM, along with several other metropolitan area asso- ciations, was recently given legislative responsibility for suggesting appoin- tees to the Regional Transit Board. That process did not go well. The Board of Directors did not limit the number of people recommended for appointment to the vacant seats, and the Metropolitan Council heeded very few of its recommen- dations in making their selections. During its background work, the Task Force discussed the Metropolitan Council at some length with several legislators, as well as the current Chair of the Metropolitan Council and a former executive director of the Citizens League. There was a general feeling among the legislators that the Council has not been effective in performing its functions well. At the same time, it was suggested that the Councilmembers are frustrated due to their lack of a "real clout• and constant legislative undercutting of their authority to accomplish the work for which they are responsible. 0 With no consensus in the legislature or in the metropolitan area as to the appropriate amount of authority that should be vested in the Council, many metropolitan regional issues get resolved vis -a -vis the political process of the legislature. The shortcoming of this approach is that the metropolitan area is giving up some of the authority to set its own agenda. There is also some con- fusion and ambiguity over the relationship of the Council to the Governor, who is responsible by law for appointing its members. It was suggested that the ANN could very definitely be of help in defining the proper role for the Council and the operating agencies, and in mustering legislative support to enact neede6 changes. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMN should become more proactive in helping set the metropolitan agenda. Historically we have placed ourseives in somewhat of a watchdog or adver- sarial role with the Council and operating agencies, merely reacting to the proposals put forward. We should become more positive in identifying areas of legitimate regional involvement, and help to set the goals and objec- tives to be pursued by regional government, as well as the parameters within which that work will be carried out. 13 q,3 - 10 - 2. We need to "be there ". It is estimated that an AMM staff member should be at the Metropolitan Council and agencies from eight to sixteen hours per • week, interacting with the Councilmembers and the staff, and keeping affected cities informed and up -to -date as to what is happening in regional government. Other responsibilities have kept the staff from a full commitment to this vital role, and this shortcoming should be corrected expeditiously. 3. The appointment of members to the Transportation Advisory Board and Technical Advisory Committee seems to be functioning well, and should continue as present. 4. The AMM should continue to support its legislative responsibility to nomi- nate persons for appointment to the Regional Transit Board. The AMM Board of Directors should do a better job of screening the applications wkich are received, so as to indicate to the Metropolitan Council those people that it truly wants appointed to the RTB. 5. The Task Force recommends that the AMM pursue the possibility of the creation of a merit selection board for the nomination to the Governor of persons to be appointed to the Metropolitan Council. The selection board would include representatives appointed by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, the Metropolitan Intercounty Association, the Citizens League, the League of Women Voters, etc. Statutory authority to give the new selection board credibility and authority should be pursued. The merit selection board would replace the screening committee currently appointed by the Governor. 0 6. Finally, the Task Force recommends that the AMM be the impetus for creation of a blue ribbon committee to study and better define the mission, role and purposes of the Council and regional agencies. While AMM would be the host, it would be important to involve other government associations and "good government" groups. Also, the the task should be approached in a spirit of cooperation with the Metropolitan Council members. The study of the We ribbon committee should include alternatives for the selection and anpointment of Metropolitan Council members. • - 11 - / 39y PUBLIC RELATIONS If, as suggested in the revised Purposes statement, the AMM is to be the exclusive representative of the collective interests of the metropolitan cities, then it is important that the Association increase its visibility in the eyes of the legislature and the general public. The Task Force reviewed and endorsed the work of the AMM's Legislative Coordinating Committee Public Relations Subcommittee to establish a public relations system to inform the public, including media, legislators, and AMM legislative contacts about metropolitan city issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Media contacts should be identified in each AMM- member city vis -a -vis a legislative contact response form. Legislative contacts in each city should be responsible for interaction with local newspapers, radio, city newsletters, cable television, etc. 2. The AM should identify contacts within the major metropolitan area media, both print and electronic. 3. A delegation from the AMM Legislative Coordinating Committee should meet with major newspaper staffs early in legislative sessions to discuss AMM priorities and positions. Media contacts, both local and metropolitan • wide, should be invited and encouraged to attend our legislative breakfasts. 4. During legislative sessions, we should issue specific press releases on AMM priorities, and response to important issues (i.e. tax policy) as changes are proposed. 5. At the conclusion of each legislative session, we should issue press releases on the AMM's legislative agenda, and how well we believe the legislature met the needs of metropolitan area municipalities. 6. We recommend that AMM develop a `report card* of priority issues with ratings for each legislator. These should be distributed to member cities with suggestions for potential local use. 7. We need to identify potential allies on important issues, i.e. Chambers of Commerce, League of Women Voters, etc. • 134s - 12 - ' OMMUNICATIOHS WITH MEMBER CITY OFFICIALS • The Task Force feels that the AMM needs to develop a metropolitan "conscious- ness" among member city officials, so that they will buy into and promote the AMM's agenda. Unfortunately, Councilmember time is scarce, making it difficult to insure that each and every member city official is well - informed and aware of AMM activities, policies and priorities. The first recommendation of the 1984 Task Force report was that the AMM should expand its effort to communicate directly with all elected officials in member cities, as opposed to only mayors and city managers. Since that time, the AMM has had differing distribution lists for different types of communications. Apparently, this is causing a great deal of confusion, and may actually be causing a decrease in consistent communications. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should strive to publish a short executive summary of legislative positions that could be quickly read by member city officials who don't want the "full shot ". 2. An AMM contact person, preferably the City Manager, should be developed in each city. All communications should be sent to that one contact person, with them taking responsibility for seeing that the material is dupli- cated and sent to all members of the governing body. The AMM contact person will also be responsible for reporting on AMM activities at the Council meeting. 3. Member cities should be encouraged to place discussion of AMM policies and issues on regular City Council agendas to ensure that all elected officials are kept aware of AMM activities, as well as to increase the Association's visibility with local media. 4. Each member of the AMM Board of Directors should commit to make a brief presentation at four or five surrounding City Council meetings once each year on AMM policies and activities. is • 13 - 4 WORKLOAD AND STAFFING When originally formed, the ANN had four full -time staff members. Shortly y thereafter, in response to a financial shortfall, the staff was cut to three and has remained at that number since. During that time, the number of legislative policies has increased from 35 to over 100, and the number of legislative study committees from two to five. The Association has taken on other responsibilities including the license and permit survey, and coordination and administration of the Metropolitan Salary Survey. With more time being spent on lobbying of statewide issues and support for committees, there has been a decided time shift away from interaction with the Metropolitan Council and operating agencies. Yet the ANN is the only organiza- tion providing any real oversight of these agencies. For example, we are usually the only commentor on the Metropolitan Council's annual work program and budget. The ANN Membership has come to expect more involvement by the Association, not only in metropolitan issues, but in tax policy, pay equity, tax increment financing, and other areas of statewide concern and involvement. The 1954 Mission and. Membership Services Task Force report recommended very strongly that the Board of Directors seek ways to add a staff member. Yet this is the only one of the 1984 recommendations that has yet to be implemented. To quote that report, *the present staff simply cannot adequately cover all the critical issues, agencies, committees and the legislature.' The present Task Force report, if ultimately adopted and implemented by the Board and membership, will • only serve to increase the workload significantly. RECOMENDATIONS 1. The Task Force strongly recommends that the Board of Directors add a staff person. We further recommend that this person have responsibilities in: a. communicating with member cities and maintaining the legislative contact system public relations, including media contacts c. staffing some of the standing and ad hoc legislative committees d. some monitoring of Metropolitan Council and agency activities, particularly during the legislative session. 2. With regard to lobbying at the Capitol, the Task Force observes that this effort will fluctuate from time to time. Therefare, it is recommended that increased efforts in this area be handled through use of contract lobbyists. • /3f "f - 14 - DUE S The membership dues for the Association are currently set at 46 percent of a members dues for the League of Minnesota Cities. Since the League dues are set in part on a per capita basis, this works out to AMM dues ranging from a high of 30 cents per capita for Woodland to a low of 4 cents for Minneapolis. fhe dues for an average sized city of 30,000 population are $5,100, or about 17 cents per capita. Compared to other city lobbying organizations, the AW is a bargain! For example, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities charges its members 40'cents per capita, plus from time to time, an additional 20 cents per capita for "special projects ". Dues for the Municipal Legislative Commission are approxi- mately 35 cents per capita, to a maximum G $12,500. If the AMM Board of Directors and membership are to implement our recommendation to add a staff person, a dues increase beyond the rate of inflation is inevi- table. In addition, the cost of developing the computerized property tax model, if determined necessary, will be a considerable initial expense, and require ongoing personnel and data gathering costs. RECOMMENDATION 1. In order to implement the other recommendations in this report, the AMM Board of Directors and membership should be prepared to adopt a dues increase in the range of 20 to 25 percent above the rate of inflation. The Board may wish to look at ways of phasing the dues increase over a two to three year period. 2. The Board and membership should also be prepared to provide financial sup- port for development and maintenance of a property tax modeling system, if the LMC system fails to materialize or is determined inadequate to meet the lobbying needs of the ANN. • - 15 - /3 �� SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is now in its 16th year During its relatively short existence, the Association has experienced many diffi- culties and challenges. Examples include the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the more recent debates over local government aid. Despite predictions for the demise for general purpose organizations like the Association, the AMM is now st an all -time high of 68 member cities, repre- senting over 90 percent of the population in the seven - county metropolitan area. The cities of the region apparently believe that they are getting a good value for their membership dollars. However, despite the successes of the past, the twelve members of this years Mission and Membership Services Task Force have concluded that this is no time to rest on our laurels. We face challenges froar other city lobbying groups whose interests are contrary to those of the metropolitan area, as well as a generally hostile attitude by the State legislature toward cities. At the same time, the complexity of governing the metropolitan area is increasing geometri- cally, meaning that it is more important than ever to work together if we are to effectively serve the citizens of our respective communities. The Task Force concludes that in order to remain viable and relevant, the ANN must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The ANN provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropoli- tan area to express in a united voice the important perspective of local govern- ment. The issues at stake are simply too important to abandon the playing field and leave all the important decisions to others. The Association was originally formed out of several metropolitan area splinter groups who had originally felt that they had little in common, but came to realize that the things they did have in common were far more then those that divided them. The challenges of today are certainly no less than those that faced our cities in the past. Our test will be whether we can continue to be an effective voice for the collective interests of the cities in this metropolitan area, and to pass that test will require two things: 1. A renewed ability and commitment to come together through our com- mittees and 19- member Board of Directors to reach a consensus on the critical issues that face us. 2. The ability to effectively, and with a united front, promote the policies we do adopt to the Governor, the legislature, the Metropolitan Council and the regional operating agencies. The Mission and Membership Services Committee feels that the recommendations set forth in this report will set us well on a course to accomplishing just that. We commend it for your consideration and thoughtful action. • /3 7 7 -16 - APPENDIX A PURPOSES The purpose of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities shall be to: I. Serve as the exclusive and primary representative of the collective interests of all metropolitan cities on metropolitan wide issues and state wide issues with unique metropolitan significance. T. Promote collaborative problem solving efforts between and among cities, the State, the Legislature, private interests and other public interests. 3. Eftectively express in a unified voice policies concerning the structure, powers and other utters relating to municipal r e orreent for the municipalities in the metropolitan area to Legislature, Metropolitan Council and agencies, LiC, media and cities. 4. Serve as a forum through which all municipalities or groups of municipalities may develop and propose policies and positions on matters on concern to the metropolitan municipalities and develop strategies for advocating those policies and positions. S. Serve as a forum for the interchange of ideas and information among municipalities in the metropolitan area and to foster # intermunicipal cooperation. 6. Assist member cities resolve disputes with other cities and agencies. 7. Develop and rovide, either alone or in concert with League of Kinnesota Cities or other organizations or agencies, programs of technical assistance to member municipalities. 9. Establish specific prioritized agenda, including Legislative proposals to address member community needs. 9. Poster, generate and promote information and data concerning the problems and issues and proposed solutions affecting municipal goverment in the metropolitan area to the State Legislature, in particular, and to the public at large. lo. Enha.jcs the effectiveness of municipal government in the metropolitan area by holding conferences and by fostering pertinent research projects. 11. Coordinate the efforts of AM members to promote their interests within the League of Minnesota Cities. • 12. Enhance the quality of life in the metropolitan area and its cities by promoting efficient and progressive service delivery systems for our residents. - 17 - I YW APPENDIX NDIX d List of resource persons who consulted with the Task Force: Vern Peterson, Executive Director, Association of Metropolitan Municipalitits Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Donald Slater, Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities Jim Miller, Minnetonka City Manager and Representative of Municipal Legislative Commission Jim Krautkramer, Brooklyn Park Mayor, President of Northern Mayors' Association Millie McCloud, President, League of Minnesota Cities State Representative Phil Carruthers (DFL -474) Chair of Metro Affairs Subco mittee of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee e State Representative Alice Johnson (DFL -51A), Vice Chair of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee Al Loehr, Legislative Administrative Assistant to Senator Bob Schmitz (DFL -S6), Chair of Local and Urban Affairs Committee Steve Keefe, Chair, Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Ted Kolderie, Former Executive Director, Citizens League of the Twin Cities • • • Not -18- REPORT OF THE NOMINATING COMMITTEE • TO: Member City Officials FROM: Gary Bastian, Chair RE: Committee Recommendations Pursuant to Article IX, Section 3 of the By -Laws, a Nominating Committee was appointed by the Board of Directors and is recommending the following persons for your consideration. FOR PRESIDENT: Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley (current Vice - President) FOR VICE PRESIDENT: Bob Long, Councilmember, St. Paul FOR BOARD DIRECTORS: (Nine to be elected - Eight for Two - Year terms) *Karen Anderson Don Ashworth William Burns Joan Campbell Dave Childs Betty McCollum Marilyn Corcoran Gloria Vierling Gene White ONE -YEAR TERM Councilmember (Incumbent.) Manager Manager Councilmember Manager (Incumbent) Councilmember Mayor Councilmember (Incumbent) Councilmember Minnetonka Chanhassen Fridley Minneapolis New Brighton North St. Paul Dayton Shakopee Prior Lake CONTINUING BOARD MEMBERS: (One -year remaining it term) Bonnie Balach Bill Barnhart Sharon Klumpp Bernie Peroz Don Ramstad Craig Rapp Tom Spies Asst. to the Mayor Gov't. Relations Rep. Administrator Councilmember Councilmember Manager Councilmember St. Paul Minneapolis Oakdale Burnsville Maple Grove Brooklyn Fark Bloomington PAST PRESIDENT Walt Fehst Manager Robbinsdale NOMINATING COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Gary Bastian Jerry Dulgar Tom Egan Edwina Garcia Peggy Ke ] 1 y Sharon Klumpp Paula Maccabee Dennis Schneider Dave Unmacht Councilmember Manager Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Administrator Councilmember Councilmember Manager Maplewood Crystal Eagan Richfield Edina Oakdale St. Paul Fridley Prior Lake /4104�_ TAD JUDE r !Motif COMMISSIONER i +� O 346•30" 4' .1 t � � . BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 May 1, 1990 The Honorable Steve Smith Mayor, City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Steve: The Hennepin County Board will hold budget priority hearings beginning May 10, 1990, and going through June 14, 1990. This is an excellent opportunity for con -.erned citizens to share their thoughts with county board members as to budget priorities and process before the detailed budget work is done. I expect that commissioners and county staff will reflect the outcome of these hearings in the final budget in November. You and the city of Mound are welcome to participate. • As you probably know, the county budget totals nearly one billion dollars for 1990 and serves one million plus people who live in Hennepin County. The meetings will be held at A2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, and will begin at 9:30 a.m. on the following dates: May 10, 1990: State and Federal mandates and their impact upon the quantity of County provided services. May 17, 1990: Attaining a balance between preventative vs. treatment services in order to maximize the service results of available funding. May 24, 1990: Model service delivery and payment mechanisms. (How can we deliver services more effectively, and upon what basis should the County charge for them) May 31, 1990: Financial resource constraints, including fiscal disparities, tax shifting and reimbursement formulas. June 7, 1990: Budget prioritization and management processes, i.e., How should we spend available funds among types of generic services such as highways, social services, health, etc. I Serving the communities of: Corcoran • Dayton • Deephaven • Excelsior • Greenfield s Greenwood Hanover • Hassan • Independence • Long Lake • Loretto • Maple Grove r Maple Plain • Medicine Lake Medina • Minnetonka Beach • Minnetrista • Mound • New Hope • Orono • Plymouth s Rockford • Rogers St. Bonifacius s Shorewood s Spring Park • Tonka Bay • Wayzata s Woodland • • June 14, 1990: off- budget County expenditures and their relationship to the main budget process and priorities, i.e., Railroad Authority, Housing Redevelopment Authority, etc. If you would like to be scheduled to speak, please contact Ms. Becky Ross at 348 - 4019 to address the board on any or all of the above issues. I look forward to working with you on these and other issues to come before the board. Sincerely, T J� -5 rJ --fr zt JL_ 4 troy • rqo!5 4 .Qn �'S C April 1990 Y F # 1. To rW we approve the DUR's decision not to allocate the ground— ;. water for a purpose that under state law has the lowest priority. The use of our drinking water from the aquifers to improve' recreational use of the lake is just not appropriate, ground,. water is an asset not easily replaced and must be conserved as. much as possible. we support the review of a plan to implement' and finance the capping of these wells so that there will be no possibility of their future use. The alternative that was proposed to divert the rivers to Lake Minnetonka is also inappropriate. The water qualities of the rivers, the cost to taxpayers and the potential detrimental s effect to downstream water uses diotate that this alternative plan should be considered only for the highest priority needs and only after all other options have been researched. Both plans are environmentally unsound and we urge you to join us in making our region's and planet's future our greatest concern. sestonka I-own Meeting on Ravironment This letter was drafted by the participants at a Town Meeting held as part of Earth week activities in the westonka area. • rqo!5 IIY?k'� 3 YESIWA AREA ENVIRONMENTAL TOWN MEETING - WONESDAY - APRIL 25, 199 '!hose present were: Bruce Martin Rosemary Schauer - The Laker Kathyrn Klut'' Steve Smith, hayor of Mound Tom Casey Skip Johnson, Mound Councilmember Liz Jensen, Mound Councilmember Phyllis Jessen, Mount: Councilm+ember Kathleen Pyatt Topics Discussed veto: 1. Opening wells and diverting rivers to Lake Minnetonka. 2. Nrtlands - balance between protection and uses reduce snowmobile impact; try to increase protection; educate on Purple Loosestrife. 3. Recycling - mandatory? can City help with pick -up of yard waste? can we provide chipper and use chips for paths! vacuum leaves? packaging ordine-=-R needs to be uniform. i. Fertilizers A pesticides - education on environmentally safe use. W • FA "XT LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473 -7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE May 1990 KI MAY 21990 Saturday 12 Water Structures s Environment Cosmittee 7 :30 a.m., LMCD office, Ilayzata depot Monday 21 Lake Use C oust ittee 400 p.m., LMCD office, Wayzata depot Weducsday 23 LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting 7 :30 p.m., Tunka Bay City Hall Friday 25 Eurasian Water Hilfoil Task Force 8:30 a.m., Freshwa`er Foundation, Navarre Monday 28 Memorial Day Holiday, LMCD office closed Tuesday 29 Launching ceremonies, 1990 Eurasian Water Milfoil weed harvest program, Spring 'Park public access 4 -30 -90 • ar 7 w T'- s LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473 -7033 EVENTS S C H E D U L E MAY 1990 IT'D MAY 2 iUJU MAY 1990 Sat S Consolidated Races Sun 6 Sat 12 San 13 1Lur 17 " u Sat 19 Sun 20 " " Thur 24 . Fri 25 Sat 26 Weisconka NU crappie tournament Sun 27 Consolidated Races W/K Pro-As Use tourney Mon 28 Consolidated-Races Tue 29 Thur 31 • r-/1/90 8:30 as lower lake 1 :3u pa lower lake 8:30 am, 10:00 on, and 2:00 pa lower lake 10:00 = and 1:30 pa. lower lake 6 t 15 pa loges lake 8:30 aa, 9:30 aa 1:30 pa and 3:30 pa lower lake; 2:00 pa upper lake 9:30 m and 1:30 ps lower lake 10 :30 sa upper lake 6:15 lower lake 6:00 pa lower like 10:00 as and 2:00 pa lower lake 2:00 ps upper lake 7:00 s to Moon. Spring ?ark Say 10:00sm, 11 :00 m and 1:30 pea lower lake 10 :30 as upper lake Maxwell Ray Marina 10:00 we lower lake. 10 :30 as upper lake 6:00 pea lower lake 6:15 pa lower lake for