The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-02-26 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET = 2 -26 -91 #1 '- 3. OVA #91- 003: DAVID LANGRUD, 1717 AVOCET LANE, LOT 5, BLOCK 8, DREAMWOOD, PID # 13- 117 -24 21 0023. REOUEST: LOT SIZE AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS. Pg. 407 -426 4. REQUEST FROM GARY STRAND TO CONNECT TO MOUND UTILITIES, LOT 5, BLOCK 1, WOODVIEW ESTATES, MINNETRISTA. Pg. 427 -434 5. 1990 DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS: CITY OF WOUND Pg. 435 -460 MOUND, MINNESOTA Pg. 1OtD CITY COUNCIL - JON SUTHERLAND, BUILDING OFFICIAL Pg. '- 3. OVA #91- 003: DAVID LANGRUD, 1717 AVOCET LANE, LOT 5, BLOCK 8, DREAMWOOD, PID # 13- 117 -24 21 0023. REOUEST: LOT SIZE AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS. Pg. 407 -426 4. REQUEST FROM GARY STRAND TO CONNECT TO MOUND UTILITIES, LOT 5, BLOCK 1, WOODVIEW ESTATES, MINNETRISTA. Pg. 427 -434 5. 1990 DEPARTMENT HEAD REPORTS: - FRAN CLARK, CITY CLERK Pg. 435 -460 - DON BRYCE, FIRE CHIEF ti Pg. 461 -465 - JON SUTHERLAND, BUILDING OFFICIAL Pg. 466 -481 6. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. 7. SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR YEAR XVII (199. URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. 090628TZD DATE: APRIL 9, 1991. 8. LICENSE RENEWALS. Pg. 482 9. PAYMENT OF BILLS. Pg. 483 -497 10. INFORMATIMKISCBLUMOUB A. January 1991 Financial Report as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. Pg. 498 -499 B. LMCD mailings. Pg. 500 C. Park & Open Space Commission Minutes of February 14, 1991. Pg. 501 -505 D. Planning Commission Minutes of February 11, 1991. Pg. 506 -508 Page 398 ( T XM E. Economic Development Commission Minutes January 31, 1991. `< F. Invitation from MWCC to attend bre014jst, meeting to discuss a drat of the updated 3 MWCC Wastewater Treatment and Handling kw Implementation Plan (1990- 2010) and 19lt budget information. Please let Fran know if you would like to attend, , r RAI J. A x . v ryry e ft k `7*s � .k j4 tJ* 44 .., w i wr Page 39'q 7 7 777 0 U§3L Us r explained that Minnetonka Portable Dredging is and extension for a grading permit granted to loral which will expire on March 9, 1991. The City F re nded that only a six month extension be granted. ! ''Al discussed the fact the City did not recover all its , On tha original grading permit. The legal fees alone were 0 1 The applicant put $500. CO in escrow and paid $328.50 or iginal permit for a total of $828.50. V A, ,$01120Y made by BLith, seconded by Ahrens to renew the giaq posit granted to Minnetonka Portable Dredging for . gad Anthonyls Floral property,, 1961 Commerce Blvd, upon falment of $121.50 and putting $300.00 in escrow to cover additional expenses incurred by the city. Permit to expire a months from March 9,, 1991. The vote was "animusly in favor. Motion carried. Tne following Department Heads presented their annual reports to the City council: Park Director Jim Fackler; Street Superintendent Geno Hoff: and Water & Sewer Superintendent Greg Skinner. 1.4 L.M.C.D. R$PRESEMSATIYx #B REPORT - TOM REE8E Tom Reese reviewed the L.M.C.D.'s plan for 1991 weed harvesting. He updated the Council on the comprehensive Lake Management Plan. 1.5 1991 COMMERCIAL IM80RAMCE PRoggAM - EARL BAILEY. R. L YOUNGDABL & ASSOCIATES Mr. Earl Bailey, R. L. Youngdahl & Associates, presented the new insurance premiums which are as follows: yoi 1991 1991 1990 PROJECTED A CTUA Property 8,615 9,304 11,049 (1) Crime 293 316 293 (1) Equipment 3,296 3,560 3,296 (1) General Liability 46,740 50,479 49,772 (1) Automobile 23,038 24,881 25,285 (1) Liquor 4,504 4,864 5,148 (2) Emer. Med. Techs. INCL. INCL. INCL. (1) Public Officials E & 0 5,556 6,000 5,757 (1) Police Professional INCL. INCL. INCL. (1) Worker's Compensation 59,924 64,119 60,770 (3) Bonds 1,238 1,238 1,238 (4) Fireman's A & H M X54 250 (5) TOTALS 153,454 165,011 162,858 yoi Doug Swanson and Dick Meredith of the Southwest Trail Association were present. Bill Kullberg, President of the State Snowmobile Association was also present and explained that the 147 miles of trail is groomed, maintained and repaired solely with volunteer help. In return, the Minnesota DNR reimburses them for time and materials. That money is used for maintenance and fuel to operate 2 groomers. They are requesting that Mound be the sponsor city for the Southwest Trail Association. Mound would be the vehicle through which they would receive State grant -in -aid funds. Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION /91 -30 RESOLUTION AUTHORISING CITY SPONSORSHIP OF STATE GRANT -IN -AID SNOWMOBILE TRAIL FUNDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • 40z e k ds 7, 7M C F w 23 February 1, 1991 Specialty Lines (1) League of MM. Cities Insurance Trust thru N.S'R.S. (2) Transcontinental Insurance Co. (CNA) thru John' Crowther (3) League of MN. Cities Insurance Trust thru E.B.A. (4) Capitol Indemnity (5) Health Special Risk He then offered to reduce his agency•s commission by 20 *, or $2+204 reducing the total premium to $160,655 Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: "' °' tNBNLOTIQII #91 -29 RNBOLUTION ACCEPTING THN WO&ICIES, MWIM N M Comas as SMUTTED by MR. sNRL *AIL =T, R. L. YOVUGDAIL it ASSOCIATNS FOR THE 1991 IHBURANCN PROGRAM Doug Swanson and Dick Meredith of the Southwest Trail Association were present. Bill Kullberg, President of the State Snowmobile Association was also present and explained that the 147 miles of trail is groomed, maintained and repaired solely with volunteer help. In return, the Minnesota DNR reimburses them for time and materials. That money is used for maintenance and fuel to operate 2 groomers. They are requesting that Mound be the sponsor city for the Southwest Trail Association. Mound would be the vehicle through which they would receive State grant -in -aid funds. Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION /91 -30 RESOLUTION AUTHORISING CITY SPONSORSHIP OF STATE GRANT -IN -AID SNOWMOBILE TRAIL FUNDS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • 40z } f r b P] i w 'sF ftbr ►ary 12, 1991 1 . 7 109MUS MWJAMN � ICI Won IN 20 am OF h ' Jossen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: 21MLOTION $91 - 31 PROCLAIMING MARCX 3 -10, loll. 71l� vnr os cx sir or mom F. The vote was unanimously in favor. notion carried. now am RAW The Council reviewed the policy and proposed ordinance amendment. They had concerns about the liability exposure for the City. They also had questions for the Police Chief. This item will be On the Agenda again on March 12th when the police C'nief will be available to answer questions. 1.9 BID ANXID3 SIM SMMM ppo 8Y j= go CITY COO�CIL The City Manager explained the two bids were received as follows: Audio Video Total Todd Communications Electronic Design 11,535 13,268 24,803 12,604 24,207 36,811 He recommended accepting the Todd Communication's bid. Smith moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION X91 -32 RESOLUTION TO AWARD THB SIDS FOR THE AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TO TODD COMMUNICATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,535 (AUDIO) AND $13,268 (VIDEO) The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • 403 Aega•sc 95 WCOM eDtsgoboe •Udders, in the amount of 0*973.05o for Work dome at tho Mound ltay park Vepot. The vot was vnaniMOusiT is favor. Notion casrir4. 1.13 DOE_ QADEA i54-, 57. fa j so - CITV X&LL ADDI'1"ION & Live The City Engineer presented the following Change Orders: Change Order #54 - Removal i installation of existing window. ADD 770.00 Change Order #57 - Rework at old parking lot - Maywood Road. ADD 948.00 Change Order #63 - Soil corrections under existing parking lot and drive. ADD 3,971.00 Change Order #68 - Reconnecting existing drain tile under the parking lot to the new storm sewer system. ADD 3,233.00 Total is $8,922.00 Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: yon 37, 03 AIM fO AM FMMZN TED FOR A TOTAL UoUNT OF $8,922.00 - CITY FALL ADDITION AND RRMODELING The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.14 PhYNENT swum -CITY STILL A10I1110 #, X=DmLrtre The City Engineer presented Payment Request #9, for Shingobee Builders, in the amount of $89 and recommended approval. RbTl It Made b? eNith, 06e►a4e4 by Jessen to apprave Payment ,F Retest 0 from sbimgebee su lders, in the amount of "" O ral-5 for the city Bail Addition i Remodeling. The 'rote Was unanimously is favor. Motion carried. 1.15 2MM SOULSTUD MBAP X45- 101-07 The City Engineer presented the final plans and the engineering cost estimate for the improvements on Tuxedo Blvd. frc.m Wilshire Blvd. (County Road 12f) to Clyde Road. The estimated cost is .$171,734.00, with all but a small portion of storm sewer being paid from State Aid funds. He than gave an update on Mound's Municipal State Aid Account as of February 11, 1991. He then showed that Mound will lose $9,403 in apportionment due to the loss of excise tax in 1991. Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #91 -34 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE FINAL PLANS AND THE ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE FOR THE TUXEDO BLVD. IMPROVEMENT - NO" 145 -101- 07 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #91 -35 RESOLUTION APPOINTING JIM FACKLER THE ASSISTANT WIND INSPECTOR FOR THE CITY OF MOUND IN 1991 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • • YOS K. Letter dated January 29, 1991, and attachments from Representative Steve Smith who is authoring proposed legislation on the regulation of the use and operation of personal watercraft (jet skis). L. Letter from JRN Properties stating that they had no significant incidents at Commerce Place last summer and thanking the Police Department. NOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at 11:35 B.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 0 Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager yob � g+ q A Feburary 12, 1991' i A Department Head Monthly Reports for January 1991. B. L.M.C.D. Representative's Monthly Report for January 1991. 3 C. Planning Commission Minutes of January 28, 1991. ; D. L.M.C.D. mailings. R. Notice from HS9 re: proposed CA rate increase. F Letter dated January 30, 1991, from Rachel Thibault, "dain strative Technician, LMCD responding to Fran Clark* letter of January 23, 1991, -on the questions rais about Lakewinds Association. 0 Official population counts for Minnesota and the City of Hound frow the Bureau of the Census. We have increased our Population since 1980 by 354 persons. 1980 population was 9,280. H. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (ARM) Policies and Legislative Proposals for 1991. I. Memo dated January 28, 1991, from AMU on 1991 riorit y P policy issues. J. Invitation from LMCD to attend the annual "Save the Lake" recognition banquet. Please let Fran know ASAP if you wish to attend. K. Letter dated January 29, 1991, and attachments from Representative Steve Smith who is authoring proposed legislation on the regulation of the use and operation of personal watercraft (jet skis). L. Letter from JRN Properties stating that they had no significant incidents at Commerce Place last summer and thanking the Police Department. NOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to adjourn at 11:35 B.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 0 Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager yob � 1 �" gym` „ ghTE a P l ann i'ng Commission Agenda of February 25, 1991 Tot Planning Commission, Applicant and Staf I~ IMi s Jon Sutherland, Building Official ' CASE NO.: 91 - 003 APPLICANT: Dave Langrud ADDRESS: 1717 Avocet Lane LEGAL Lot S, Block 8, Dreamwood DESCRIPTION: PID 913- 117 -24 21 0023 SUBJECT: Lot Size and Side Yard Setback Variances to Allow Structural Alterations ZONING: R -2 Single Family Residential The applicant seeks a building permit to remodel the existing- dwelling which will extend the life of the structure (Section 23.404 (7). There are three nonconformities with this property, the following variances are being requested: 1) Lot area variance of 1,512 square feet: ' 4,488 square feet existing, minimum 6,000 square feet is required in the R -2 Single Family Residential ,Zone. 2) Side yard setback variance to the south property line of .rA,': 5.7' existing, 6' is required. 3) Side yard setback variance to the north property line of ap- proximately 1.5 8.5' ( + / -) exist.ng, 10' is required. Section 23.605.5, Subd. 3 requires th a ten foot access to a garage site be shown. SX.NilENTS The existing dwelling is substandard throughout with the only ex- ception that the foundation portion that can be visually in- spected appears to be sound. 407 Staff Recommendation Case No. 91 -003 1717 Avocet Lane Page 2 �I�QAT I ON Staff recommends approval of the variance as requested to afford the property owner reasonable use of his land, subject to colt- pliance with the following conditions: 1); The complete crawl space be excavated to provide for adequate air circulation around the floor joist system. u8C Section 251e(a) requires a minimum of 18" to the bottom of wood joists or a mini of 12" to the bottom of girders. 2) The crawl space be ventilated by an approved mechanicai means per UBC Section 2516 (a). 3) Any exterior wall or ceiling that Is modified and has plaster, Gypsum board or siding removed is to be insulated to current energy code for its specific component. d) A heat lost calculation by a qualified mechanical contractor shall be submitted. 5) The central heating plant be thoroughly inspected and checked for proper operation by a qualified mechanical con - trnctor who will supply a house heating test record form as supplied by the Building Official. Properiy'slzed duct work for supply and return air must be provided to each portion/ room of the house. 6) Included, but adequately addressed within the Building Code, that any and all structural modifications be properly designed and installed. 7 ) That a 1 1 other aspects of the bu i 1 d i ng that are mod i f i ed be brought into compliance with current code as required by the Building Official. This case will be heard by the City Council on February 26, 1991. The abutting neighbors have been notified. u. ju j�73$i`4�f 4 blyai t CITY OF MOUND ` � Y 5341 Maywood Road Fee hound, HN 55364 472 -1155 Case NP:1 Vim' t_AM AM ECATt ! Must IL ZOMMS *Ike i (Please type or print the foi lowlev if for 1 . f Address of Subject Property 1717 ace�rmoi- nn Owner's Da y iihonpAll, <, Owner's Address / -, ; je r, z o,,.- - . l " Applicant's Name (if other than owner) Address /� / Day Phone Lot - o►dd # t i on '({ y�ii .�_ NO Nei Existing Use of Property: Zoning Dlstrfct Aa Has an application ever been made for zoning,, earl e ItIonaI use permit, or other Zoning for this i%e)#-MO procedure property? yes ( ), if yes. list date (s) of app li cat Ion. action taken, and prov resolution number(s) (copies of prev�ious resoluti must accompany this applfcation). "G/(e VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR: (W Principal Building ( ) ACCOssory Building direction setback setbackARtA requested required EWD Front Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Lake Front: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. 12 ft. ft. Side Yard: (J S E W ) % ft. 1(} ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft _104 p�r� v sq ft sq ft 401 t present of the property conform to all reguiarmsons for each f� I �o wi Igc use: I s l ated? Yes ( ) . Not : j. I f no, ._ n 10 existing structure comply with all area, height, bulk, elk regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? if no•ecify each non conforming use: unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent ct? nable use for any of the uses perms ted In that zoning too narrow ( ) topography ( soil too 5smBI drainage ( sub- surface too shaiow ( ) shape ( other: specify # the hardship described above created by the action of anyone 1 froperty interests In the land after the zoning ordi was Yes t ). No If yes, explain_ ode the hardship created by any other man -made change, such as the 1�`io"tion of a road? Yes ( ). No ? If yes, explain 7, Art the conditions of hardsh.i p for which you request a variance Oft ut for only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ) if no, list some other properties which are similarly a f+ ed ?. *J certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in ' any requi papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- tor #too I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this ItdotIon by'any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose i#itiepecting• or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may bilt r� I red b law. . 1 fC nt's Signs turfe Date 410 a i ii �AWM P-M. '. N I FOUR WW !NONE: ATLANTIC 3062 MINNSAP01.1% MINK, 0 MWIIIIIII0411AM AL 41111111110 INS BIR � SURVEY Far 1 % � 0 i /tl' %cr �C �i, �" GC % - >`i� ' • �r � ' l� /.:' /s �' �� /C �r''r��l/ ��r Vic" �,•r �: 4,�'< v' i s'r /.' `C /� � -!'� � -/� ✓� .• /��i� �� %rte /��yr %G'!�; ..% .:•� //•y�: C</ l�r r /.:' / /1 /' .. ' -� elf �, � /�if%� ,�� %r' i .r• _i tai %' /C: - ,�. [/ y/, MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION February 26, 1991 Those present were: Commissioners Bill Meyer, Chair; Geoff Michael; Jerry Clapsaddle; Frank Weiland; MichEei Mueller; Bill Voss; and Mark Hanus; Liz Jensen, Council Representative; Jon Sutherland, Building Official; Ed Shukle, City Manager; and Peggy James, Secretary. Absent and excused was Commissioner Bill Thal. The following citizens were in attendance: David and Anne Marie Langrud and Richard Schaad. Chair Meyer called the regular meeting to order at 7:34 p.m. MINUTES The February 11, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes were presented for changes and /or additions. MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Mueller, to approve the February 11, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Case No. 91- 003: Dave Langrud, 1717 Avocet Lane, Lot 5m Block 8,, Dreanwrood, P I D #13-117-24 21 0023 VARIANCE: _LOTS_ SIZE a SIDE YARD SETBACK. Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicants request for a variance to allow remodeling of the existing dwell- ing which will extend the life of the structure. According to a certificate of survey dated June 3, 1947, there are three noncon- formities with this property 1) the lot area is 4,488 square feet, 2) the north side yard has a setback of 8.5 feet, and 3) the south side setback is 5.7 feet. The R -2 zone requires a min- imum lot area of 6,000 square feet, and side yard setbacks of 6 feet and that a 10 foot access to garage site be shown. The Building Official commented that the existing swelling is substandard throughout with the only exception that the founda- tion portion that can be visually inspected appears to be sound. Staff recommended approval of the variance as requested to afford the property owner reasonable use of his land, subject to com- pliance with the following conditions: 1) The complete crawl space be excavated to provide for adequate air circulation around the floor ,joist system. UBC Section 2516(a) requires a minimum of 18" to the bottom of wood ,joists or a minimum of 12" to the bottom of girders. 2) The crawl space be ventilated by an approved mechanical • means per UBC Section 2516 (a). 3) Any exterior wall or ceiling that is modified and has piaster, Gypsum board or siding removed iu to be insulated to current energy code for its specific component. 4 t c +, t <' N = 3 y f N Planning Comm i sre4 IQ► T February 25, Iii. Page 2 f ag w, f z x s 4) A heat lost calculation by a tfival If ad ntee:helif� #"e shall be submitted.' 5) The central heating plant b+e thoroughly i Inll<pweO checked for proper operation by a qua 1, l f Ie:d Macho a iai3 11~. tractor who w i l l supply a house heat i ng teat row � supplied by the Building Official. Properly sit p : for supply and return air must be provided to eel 7► room of the house. 6) Included, but adequately addressed w ithin the BU 1 %P11 =` , that any and all structura i modification's be isir�' 1 designed and installed. 7) That all other aspects of the building that are ' I ' ad bitt brought into compliance with current code as requoihe` t Building Official. The Building Official confirmed that according to Ci ty, r the frost footin3s and foundation under the enti structl", cluding the porch, was replaced in 1966. 1n addition, b vault was granted in 1976, Resolution No. 76 -418 grant i ng e# 1ot; iti i Xis variance of 1,512 square feet with the following st•ipuleti e`'w a l l s i de yards and setbacks are met, a garage 1* i icy and structure brought up to code." Jensen expressed a concern that there is no room for d ' The applicant, Dave Langrud explained to the Commi hie purchased the house knowing he would have to fix It up. fie 'p►i+ie<liaF on putting a shed in the rear yard. Michael, who resides next door to the sub property, r0V i,e'Wtl Cl the history of ft. He explained that after the veer i eene "' weei granted In 1976 the owner realized It would be too expensive , tee bring it up to code, and therefore, never worked on the ture. Minimum work has been done on the structure a >Ir1t3l Michael has watched this structure deteriorate for the lost 1 ,11 , years. He wou 1 d be i n favor of see 1 ng 1 t f I xed up rather their' watch it continue to deteriorate, however, he would prefer that it be torn down. Voss questioned if there is a way the city could get guarantee that the improvements would be completed. He is also concerned that there is no garage, and if a garage were constructed it would require a variants. Voss is in favor of seeing the struc- ture demolished. Voss referred to the intent of the Comprehen- sive Plan related to residential redevelopment goals which 1s focused more on reducing density and intensity. r '+iPr1 1 Commi i us �i Visit ' "ry 25, `".., i tented that we need to deal with houses on undersized maybe a way to deal with the problem is through a Hous- ilntenance Code. Mueller questioned the possibility of � z 40g a perf bond to ensure that the work is completed he al felt this may be an aggressive measure. "der Is also concerned with the garage issue and feels a S w��' site shou 1 d be shown. ►TtON *amft by Voss seconded by Jensen to recommend �i6i4 of the var k Y - �r1m chted that the structure will require a considerable ol` work, an it may be best to reconstr ct the house using etxisting footings. A variance would still be required for a k ' and only minimum size r. u, , y garage could be constructed, also, slccess to the rear of the tot is too narrow. Jensen a l s o ted that she heard the a p p licants i cants sa the PP Y Y plan to improve Structure and then sell it. In addition, construction was x 'iced without a permit, and peop 1 e should check with the City " +t>r' to purcha3 I ng bu i 1 d i ng mater t a t s. 'Merle Langrud commented that they plan to live in the house :i 1 they start a family, since it is not big enough for that ''4 #iueiler commented that since there is not adequate access to a e slte and a varIante wouIri be required due to the lot size, mill a variance should not be granted for a garage, now or In future. Clllti saddle commented that this structure would probably not be ConiCmned as it stands today. It would probably sit there, if a variance was not approved, and continue to deteriorate. He does 1"t feel a garage is feasible for this site. He argued that the Comir►rehensive Plan does not give them any way to resolve the problems with these types of properties, and until there Is a way tq resolve these problems , how can we prevent or keep people from using these properties. This structure is a habitable spacer and allowing these people to fix it is better than letting I $ rot. City Planner, Mark Koegler, stated that due to the history of this property, including a new foundation In 1966, a variance in 1976 and the fact that other miscellaneous permits for minor repairs have been granted since then, the City does not have a lot of options, the variance almost has to be granted. He agrees that a way to resolve these properties needs to be developed. Mueller called for the question. • Planning Commission Minutes February 25, 1991 Page 4 Those in favor of the motion for denial were: Jensen and Voss. Those opposed to the nation for denial were: Clapsaddle, Mueller, Meyer, Hanus and Michael. Motion for denial failed with 2 in favor and 5 opposed.j Clapsaddle questioned the applicant about his intent for a shed. Mr. Langrud stated he would like a 12' x 14' shed. Staff clarified that a variance would not be required for a shed which does not exceed 120 square feet in area. Voss commented that he would like to get the City Attorney's opinion on whether the city could get some type of security agreement from the applicant to ensure that the proposed improve - ments are completed. MOTION made by Voss to table the variance request until an opinion is obtained from the City Attorney with regards to the ability of obtaining a performance bond or same other type of guarantee. Motion failed due to lack of a second. MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Clapsaddle to ap- prove the variance request as recommended by staff in- cluding conditions 1 through 7 with the following stipulations: >�) A current certificate of survey be provided showing the building location and setbacks from the lot lines. 2) No variance for a garage be granted in the future due to the lot size. 3) The City Attorney review the possibility of requir- ing a letter of credit or performance bond to en- sure the work is completed; and, if the project is not finished, what recourse would the City have. Motion carried with 5 in favor, 2 opposed. Those in favor were: Mueller, Clapsaddle, Meyer, Hanus and Michael. Those opposed were: Jensen and Voss. The Planning Commission would like to be advised of the City Attorney's response to number 3 in the motion above. Mueller commented that the Comprehensive Plan does not give an alternative to an undersized lot with a structure on it that has not be destroyed 50%. Clapsaddle added that there is no vehicle to show that the owner has been properly advised of problems with their properties. The Owner should not be held responsible for information they do not have. This case will be heard by the City Council on February 26, 1991. rte to ya a� :�� t ac.t r Certificate of St*.rvey for David M. Langrud of Lot 5, Block R, Dreamti:ood Hennepin County, Minnesota 1 Jai FOR J�i�/ JMTM'fit4f�� ' �' 77 O v, � O tV 's }� N h 9 s� IV 73 • 07 , : L egaI . , Descripti on Got 5, Block 8, Dreamwo0d This survey shows the location of an existing house: in relAt.i.on to r.h, -: houn(Vpr. i.r.�. of thc. Ahove desr. ri.hcd p roperty . Zt. dons not purnor.* to show other improvetncints or cneroac:h- ;+;r..ttf.a . t hereby ce rtiCv that this survey wAS preprired by me or under my direct stt- TV and that I am a duly regi,s- trlrt1d t,a Surveyor under the laws Of tttc: State uC Minneso ta. C0j -TTN F GKANBFRG, INC:. 30 W V W O � d Q J 30 Data . 2 Scale. I" = 20' o Iran marker BoArings shown are to an assumed datum. /i /L'�1J/�t'� /f"� `—'�- �s11� 'its �ra7 � �� L7 6 j. V,:�, Sm Va A- L%o."Rm� ;,Q ��r�►�x; /� vrN� � /L "o.c,� ..�.�svl+g'rs�7"o x'14'. w�� / fn./ v��t, z N A /0 63 AW14.) Th:'O'c 6COME Arl. ly A SOO rx/nl So - Q A /oo - (00 TH ex:; [, 1;,/;" A570 20o r TO Ct6it7tL /•rpa' Pox CODE 1A , 849-'ROB %roc , ► ► 4', rek- C 100 - X74 // 4,4ialr 7D V ro Sr�a /O Cc1 ' j., ." 1.l v�•. i Tc"> ,� o` t�.�. , 3l.. �..�u /t}T1oN md. Gov - 14 �17�.:• ` w cl uti� S �-, .� G ` ,� �A o� S�L� lcx:�JC .•.�;�: Svv_ �°i:.'Ct"kl r•r� � fl ((o�?►�L� ` 1 r�a..)DZ.+. k' yh Q �►,,,a►�� .SOU " .}�`c,►n�:: l� " �C�v.3 ...�'` •.� (..� /T-� /I'!r)T: /,S�::c; a0U ,..:,�r ADy�7 :.•F 3 - y�,3r� w /iYj,vr dSo J J ' / r l *G� ?�i 57'r1i'� C� J'?90 w7 t , i vcl��. ►•� v rvr� *iwk A .4aoX aeQ - - 77"0 - r41 lei lo fj r 7�`s �e�. � �c�e�T St v,,E ♦9��or�.�� fa,Z,,, i It N ;,. d�/h�" ©G�r.�i'U�.�.'+: OtviJ �.�'�'O/Z... SGt1�fJT' �f►�7"� JAonj w� , ii� y t : / Af 1 ~ i �1 _ 1 _ J I i i rl It al , � • � � � Ali. if_.fle-3 -, � vy� a hs Ds ..ti t' — 3 - - -- ,_.... . -.�... SK14- i4•- i.4.t+.W�/{a�L.L.[...L V 4k 9F� a tr A3_ �ODry) 1 V ta � � ...._.- •-- --^_--- ---- -. °-- °---- - - -- �__._________- _._.__� -. ..-- cu F � % '. `�rW'nR •fix � M+'.,e." r ..a + a,r .�.rrn. - .. ...... _.� ..._...__� _�.__ _ ... ._. _ C /CO It tw x j Y V • YIY� r.r_..�__.._�...�._� _ •__.�....__... _...... _.. _.. ... _..... _,r... _-..s _.....__,- .. .... r.rn.a.w...._...._.. ....r _. .. _._ .. «_r.�..,..._..- r_.. -_.r.a .._r_r -rr... a... .. ....+. ....... . +,II wt W�ww`.i++. rvJl s+rlr+. +rra..a .. a. .....r �r.�+n�r.�.r_.r.. .. w. .. ....-.. w.._-.__ rrwrr.�_r.r....rr.a.._.._.�.... .... .. ... .. _..w....__......w..r_.a +.J,.M�...^: .:....�• v.•♦u. ...r.._ _.. -. .. ...�rr.__.r r. r.._.a,.�r.wrr....w. r..... r .. .. ... .w.r.. ..a a- .....r�_rw�r ....r.+ �w a-r �.... ......_.� ...r..�rn- __...._. _.....�. —. e,.. ........ _,. -� ___ ..s.__....... r_..... _. I 1 i i 417 . ....____.. �l�- �n. f�L �/{ �:. c�.+ ricy_. _�_:t._t��!�.lo- !_`- •zce�_..� .... _ _. _�.. ' .. Ll,L� r'�G'?� �'d� �' .�(�, . ,Qc�r Diu..,.. 6--� c� L.c�!- ��.��?:? J . a _Ile UO �J • %Z/ • y • n • • 423 • T I / • • fl - C! :fill C l/ Il n �. � � a. 12Y 76 -qlb r `� �]o 11 -9 -76 RESOLUTION NO. 76 -418 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMISSION AND GRANT LOT SIZE VARIANCE OF 1,512 SQ4RE FEET WITH STIPULATIONS - Lot ;, Plo l: °, '.E_^eLtrwo:d WHEkr:AS, the applicant has a purchase agreement on Lot 5, Block 8, Dream - wood, and has requested a variance to refurbish a structure on this lot, and WHEREAS, !Additional land cannot be purchased to add to this lot, and WHYMA.S, the Planning Cow-mission has recommended granting variance providing all side yards and setbacks sre met, a ;arage is included and structure is brougFht up to code, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUN - D, MINNESOTA: That a lot size variance of 1,512 square feet be granted with the stipulation that all side yards and setbacks are met, a garage bu included and structure brought up to code. Adopted by the City Council this 9th day of November, 19 • • • ZONING REQUIREMENTS ADDRESS: ( I N APPLICANT: LOT: S BLK :_ADDN ZONE; r -L REQU I RED LOT AREA: no O EXISTING LOT AREA: REQUIRED SETBACKS FRONT: , SIDE: SIDE: REAR: 15 feet ; LAKESHORE: 50 feet EXISTING a PROPOSED S FRONT: , SIDE: , SIDE: REAR: LAKESHORE: DATE : __/ / BY: 1 p Stiff t! - lt69.98 Res __. OF MINN ETAISTA yC; I TT of MOUND LAK Q �2, •F r , v • s L , 11) 6 AA • Y C City Manager of Mound February 5, 1991 Edward Shukle Gary A. Strand Sir; PICT FEB i own the property of legal description Lot 5, Block 1, Woodview Estates, Minnetrista. The lot has frontage along West Edge and Woodedge Blvds. I have begun the initial processes of building a new home for my family and myself, with the actual digging to begin in March (the approximate location is shown on the enclosed map). I would prefer to bring city sewer and water to the lot and was instructed to initiate the process with you. I understand that the sewer is directly across West Edge Boulevard and that the water line ends at a fire hydrant approximately 300 feet away. Your assistance and guidance in helping me to achieve this goal will be greatly appreciated, and with your approval I would like to begin contacting licensed sewer and water contractors to obtain estimates on the cost of the project as soon as possible. Sincerely, 4971 Leslie Rd Mound MN 55364 H)472 -6679 W)448 -4848 p. a_ szt� Gary A. Strand • �1 I� I A"? • gET f e LOT 7 t �` I I , \ :f f �, 00 -- V;zo McCombs Funk Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 February 21. 1991 Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: Utility Connections Strand Property - Minnetrista MFRA #o9649 Dear Ed: As requested, I have reviewed the request by Mr. Strand to connect to S%e City of Mound's sanitary sewer and watermain located in West 9490 Roulevard. We are recommending denial of the watermain connection, becau"ie the City's main does not front on the subject property. If. in the future, the watermain is er.tended past this property, then a proposed connection Could be discussed. We have reviewed the conditions that would be required for the sanitary sewer connections with Mr. Strand and he is in agreement; therefore, we are recommending approval of the two sewer connections. This approval, by the Mound City Council, should be contingent upon approval by the City of Minnetrista and execution of the enclosed agreement. This agreement is the same one used two years ago when the last Minnetrista property, owner requested sanitary sewer connection. It contains a suggested connection charge of $7,428.08 for this particular property, assuming that the owner divides the lot into two building sites. If the lot is not divided and only one service is required, then the charge could be reduced by $417.00, to an amount of $7,011.08. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact US. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSC)CIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:jmj Enclosures cc: Gary A. Strand, 4971 Leslie Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 • • Ted Engineers 6121d76$G10 Planners 61V4?84 $;AX Surveyors February 21. 1991 Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: Utility Connections Strand Property - Minnetrista MFRA #o9649 Dear Ed: As requested, I have reviewed the request by Mr. Strand to connect to S%e City of Mound's sanitary sewer and watermain located in West 9490 Roulevard. We are recommending denial of the watermain connection, becau"ie the City's main does not front on the subject property. If. in the future, the watermain is er.tended past this property, then a proposed connection Could be discussed. We have reviewed the conditions that would be required for the sanitary sewer connections with Mr. Strand and he is in agreement; therefore, we are recommending approval of the two sewer connections. This approval, by the Mound City Council, should be contingent upon approval by the City of Minnetrista and execution of the enclosed agreement. This agreement is the same one used two years ago when the last Minnetrista property, owner requested sanitary sewer connection. It contains a suggested connection charge of $7,428.08 for this particular property, assuming that the owner divides the lot into two building sites. If the lot is not divided and only one service is required, then the charge could be reduced by $417.00, to an amount of $7,011.08. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact US. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSC)CIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:jmj Enclosures cc: Gary A. Strand, 4971 Leslie Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 • • SENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MINNETRISTA AND THE CITY OF MOUND t �iTI TO PROVIDING UTILITY SERVICE TO MINNETRISTA PROPERTY OWNER h IS AGREEMENT. made and entered into this day of , s i• by ar4 between the City of Minnetrista, a municipal corporation, of the Go0 of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota, hereinafter called "�twltrista ", and the City of Mound, a municipal corporation of the County of `' Y e'in and State of Minnesota, hereinafter called "Mound" and Gary A. Strand C Abberta Strand. the Owners cf property described as Lot 5, Block 1, NOW4" Estates, Hennepin County. Minnesota . t h a WITNESSET H : �a6 4 ' BREAS, Mound has inplace a sanitary sewer line at the Mound City limits its boundary with Minnetrista; and OUUt EAS, said property in Minnetrista is isolated from existing sanitary r in Minnetrista and is owned by the party requesting connection to City and h p . 1 "ONS EAS Mound has indicated that they will allow a sanitary sewer ; ettion to the Mound inplace line so that the proposed homes on said rerty in Minnetrista can be served by said services; and WHEREAS, the parties have mutually agreed that it is in the best interest Of public health, safety and welfare to provide sanitary sewer service from the Mound system to the Minnetrista property owner, and that Minnetrista and the Owner of said property will pay to Mound the following established amounts and will abide by the rules and regulations established for the Mound system and as .Set forth in this Agreement, �'i D NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements nerein described, IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows: 1. The entire cost of the service connection shall be borne by the Owners of said property requesting the connection. 2. This agreement shall limit the number of connections to two. Any additional connection request would require f. -ther action by both the City of Mound and the City of Minnetrista. 3. Within the limits established in this agreement, the prope•.`y owner in Minretrista shall be allowed to connect to and become part of the sewer system of Mound, and shall be subject to the same charges and regulations as property owners of Mound. 4. in addition to all the costs incurred and paid by the Owners for the project as outlined in Paragraph 1, the Owner shall, prior to the time they connect to Mound's sanitary sews' system, pay to Mound the availability and connection charges as follows: CONNEC'T'ION CHARGE: Original Unit Assessment - 2 units @ $ 292.00 /Unit $ 584.00 Original Footage Assessment - 652 L.F. @ $ 9.04 /L.F. 5,894.08 Availability Charge - 2 units @ $125.00 /Unit $ 250.00 TOTAL CONNECTION CHARGE $ 6,728.08 Administrative, Legal and Engineering Expense $ j 100 TOTAL CHARGE $ 7,428.08 431 QUARTERLY SEWER USE CHARGE To be determined by Mound's regular rate. The current rate for thi- Hype of service is $30.25 per quarter. 5. The Owner in Minnetrista connected to the Mound system shall be billed usage charges on the basis of the same sewer rates applicable to users In Mound, said charges to be billed directly to the user in Minnetrista. Minnetrista shall guarantee payment of these charges, subject to the cooperation of Mound in providing information to Minnetrista which will allow Minnetrista to specially assess unpaid sewer use charges against the Minnetriste property. 6. The Owner in Minnetrista connecting to the Mound systems shall be required to obtain a construction permit from Mound for a sewer connection and shall pay all connection fees in the same amounts and manner as Mound residents. 7. Mound shall not be responsible to any person, firm, or corporation for 0 damages claimed as a result of backing up of sewers in any basement in Minnetrista. 8. Mound will perform all normal maintenance on the sanitary sewer main lines within the Mound corporate boundaries. Minnetrista and /or the property owners will perform all normal maintenance or service connections to said described property and the sanitary sewer line within the Minnetrista corporate boundaries. Mound's responsibility for repair or maintenance shall end at the corporate boundary. 9. Construction of the service line to the irdividual home shall be the responsibility of the Owner in Minnetrista under the supervision Df and subject to all Minnetrista codes and regulations. 10. All sanitary sewer construction by Minnetrista and the Owner in Minnetrista shall meet the requirements of Mound" s Sanitary Sewer Standard Specifications, and any special provisions deemed necessary is by the Mound City Engineer. Y3 .z a ,, . 11. Mound agrees to cooperate a av1a 8�+t1�"? plans, specifications, and other hate riali1 Afth 11 3► bit s o a ' Minnetrista. 12. The Residential Equivalency Unit (REV) charged by the W40C !or these hook -ups shall come from the City of Minnetrista's allotment. 13. This agreement and provision of sewer service shall not be considered as evidence in any detachment or annexation proceedings. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto authorized and entered into this Agreement upon authority of the City Council of the City of Minnetrista and the City Council of the City of Mound. IN THE PRESENCE OF: CITY OF MINNETRISTA BY: Mayor _ BY: �~ City Administrator - Clerk Treasurer STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1991 by Walton Clevenger and Charlotte Erickson. the Mayor and City Administrator - Clerk /Treasurer of the City of Minnetrista. a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. IN THE PRESENCE OF: CITY OF MOUND BY: Mayor BY: City Administrator - Clerk /Treasurer 43:5 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1991, by Skip Johnson and Edward J. Shukle, Jr., the P or ZZ City Manager of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. OWNER BY: ry A. Strand BY: Roberta Strand The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1991, by Gary A. Strand and Roberta Strand. I* Y3 y February 7, 1991 TO: MAYOR CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER • R+cY, ou „ar GTA FROM: CITY CLERK SUBJECT: 1990 ANNUAL REPORT Personnel Roster: Francen? C. Clark /Leisinger, City Clerk - 8 -10 -81 Linda Strong, Secretary, /Receptionist - 8 -5 -85 Linda and I report directly to the City Manager. The City Manager and I share Linda's time. She is the receptionist first. Ed has her doing secretarial duties and I have her helping me in various areas. Linda has taken the Minnesota Clerks' Institute program. This is a 100 hour course put on by the University of Minnesota Continuing Education and she received her certificate in July, 1989. • 4 3S' 1 0 RECORDING OF COUNCIL ?RGCEB INGB There were 23 regular City Council Meetings in 1990, including .`e following: the Local Board of Review and Budget Hearing. In addition was 1 special Council Meeting. That totals 24 meetings. From these meetings 208 pages of minutes were generated for Council review and approval. Agendas are prepared by the City Manager. I then input the Agenda into the computer. The Agenda material is then put in order, attached, and numbered. Linda then runs the packets on the Xerox and directs the packets to the proper people. We send agendas to all people who have items on the agenda, highlighting the item pertaining to them. After the Council Meetings there are items that need to be followed up, such as contracts signed and sent to the proper people, directives from the Council that need to be attended to and routine items that need to be resolved. These items many times are 4 to 6 hours of work after a meeting. That does not include preparation of the minutes and the resolutions. I continue to micro -film the Council packets. This is handy when used in conjunction with ti.e Clerk's Index Program. I have all of 1989 and 1990 on the computer. This has eliminated the need to index all the City Council actions on 3 x 5 cards manually. MAINTENANCE OF ORDINANCE BOOK An ordinance is a law of local application, enacted by the City Council, which prescribes a general and permanent rule for persons or things within the City. This is distinguished from other types of regulations or actions which are undertaken by resolution or motion. Resolutions or motions generally regulate 2 43C administrative or temporary actions as opposed to a permanent law. An ordinance becomes effective upon its adoption by the City Council and publication in the official newspaper. Therefore, as soon after a Council meeting as possible, ordinances are published. After publishing, the new ordinance has to be integrated into the ordinance book in the correct area. There were 8 ordinances adopted in 1990. #39 -1990 An Ordinance Amending Sections 255:00. 255:05 and 255:15 of the City Code Relating to the Name of the Park Advisory Commission. • #40 -1990 An Ordinance Amending Section 437:10, Subd. 7 of the City Code Relating to Car Tires on Commons i Docks. #41 -1990 An Ordinance Establishing a Definition for "Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales" and Amending Sevtion 23.625.3 of the Mound Code of Ordinances to Add Accessory Outdoor Retail Sales as a Conditonal use in the Central Business (B -1) Zone. #42 -1990 An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Lands from General Business (B -2) to Two Family Residential (R -3). (Alexander Park). #43 -1990 An Ordinance Amending Section 365:15, Subd. 18 of the City Code Relating to Campaign Signs. #44 -1990 An Ordinance Repealing Section 800:30, Subd. 2 of the City Code Relating to Business License. #45 - 1990 An Ordinance Amending S ection ection 437:05, Subds. 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10; Amending Section 437:10, Subds. 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10; and Amending Section 437:15 Relating to Dock Licenscz and Docks on Public Lands. #46 -1990 An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Lands from Light Industrial (I -1) to Central Business (B -1). As Chapters in the City Code are amended, I am putting these on the computer, a disk for each Chapter. This will make revisions much faster than typing whole pages. MAINTENANCE OF RESOLUTION BOOK i A resolution is somewhere between a motiun and an ordinance. A resolution deals with matter of a special, administrative or temporary nature and is put in resolution form because of its importance or length. In 1990, the City Council adopted 154 resolutions. These are all composed, typed, signed and kept in resolution books. Each resolution is then categorized and indexed by subject and number in order to make them easier to find at a later date. This catagorizing is now done with the Clerk's Index. Copies of the resolutions are given to the various departments when they pertain to their area. I also certify resolutions to be recorded at Hennepin County if required. ELECTIONS The City Clerk must admin� er all elections for national, state and county as well as city offices and special city elections. 4 439 The State Statutes governing the election process are Chapter 200 through 210 and Chapter 412. On the surface these statutes describe the procedural steps, however, they do not describe the election process in logical step sequence. Election laws are constantly being revised by the state legislature and through court rulings so it is necessary to stay on top of all changes. I am one of 11 City Clerks chosen to serve on the Hennepin County Elections and Voter Registration Coordinating Committee. It is comprised of clerks giving good city representation of the county based on experience, the size of the municipalities and the types of election system used. This Committee deals with new legislation affecting elections and voter registration. 1990 was an election year (Federal, State and local) and what a year. To begin with the State of Minnesota (Secretary of State) has been working on a computer system for Voter Registration for some time. She chose this year to implement the system. The beginning was very rocky because the State system was being developed from scratch. Hennepin County did offer to give the State the benefit of their years of handling this enormous task but the State chose to develop their own system. There were so many problems when the system was put online that Hennepin County decided to run their system parallel to the State to assure their municipalities of correct information. When Hennepin County had cutbacks in June, they were forced to abandoned the parallel run and depend on the State system. The State system has improved, but does not allow us to give you some information that has been given in previous annual reports, i.e. total transactions for the year; additions, deletions, etc. I can tell you that between the two elections this year there were 559 new registered voters. I cannot tell you how many people changed addresses. I can tell you the number of registered voters as of February 6, 1990, was • 5,879. 411 5 • New voter registration cards are o 9 now imputted into the State system by Hennepin County. The State then assigns a Voter Identification Number and a mailed notice is sent to each new registrant to verify their residence. When the cards are returned, Linda has to check each card against the computer list to be certain State system has the correct information. She then numbers each card with the voter identification number, assigned by the State, and files them alphabetically. She also deletes those as necessary. Pre - planning is the key to holding a properly organized and well conducted election. We have used the Optec III -P equipment since 1988. The following is a synopsis of some of the procedures that were • done for the Primary and General elections that were held September 11th and November 6th. 1. Preparation of an election calendar is essential giving actual dates when duties must be performed to meet legal requirements. 2. Legal notices must be drafted in preparation for timely publication and posting. 3. Making sure there are absentee voting materials, voter registration supplies, election day supplies, ballots, and ascertaining whether election day equipment, such as voting booths and ballot boxes are in a good state of repair. 4. Polling places must be designated by the City Coancil. I make all necessary arrangements for the use of these 6 440 C7 facilities. Each polling place must meet the standards of accessibility for the elderly and the physically handicapped. 5. Election judge.. have to be located. This can be a very trying task because the pay is so low and the hours so long. There must be "party balance" in each precinct and this sometimes becomes a problem because some judges do not want to be moved from their home precinct. The law states that there must be a minimum of 1 judge for every 150 registered voters in a precinct. The count in each precinct, at 7:00 A.M. on the day of the General Election was as follows: Precinct #1 - Mount Olive - 597 voters 0 Precinct #2 - Indian Knoll Manor - 542 voters Precinct 13 - Island Park Hall - 1,765 voters Precinct #4 - Seahorse Rec. Bldg. - 960 voters Precinct f5 - The Depot - 1,152 voters Precin( -t #6 - Library - 803 voters The rule of 1 judge for each 150 registered voters is not applicable because there must be a judge for each of the following procedures: a. One -judge to act as a greeter (determine if the voter is registered or not and directs to the proper line). b. Two judges to handle the computer print -out of registered voters. 0 Y '1y1 7 • C. A demonstration judge. d. A judge to hand out the ballots. e. A judge to be near the vote tabulator to watch for error messages and assist voters. f. One or two judges to be in charge of new voter registrations. 6. The law requires that election judges for all elections be trained by a City Clerk, this also includes school elections. We have a basic course, a review course and an emergency course. This year the training course changed significantly because of the change in candidates for governor at the last minute (the Friday before the Election on Tuesday. The judges have to be trained to have some working knowledge of the vote tabulators, problems that might arise, error messages given by the tabulator, and ways to correct problems. A video tape was produced to help in training the judges on the changes in procedures and workings of the new equipment. 7. Hennepin County does the programming for the prom pack (memory pack) that is inserted in each machine. We .have two for each machine. One is for back -up in case there are problems with the other. Both prom packs for each machine are tested in each machine with a test deck of official ballots marked so that it appears there were different situations in voting, i.e. I* undervotes, overvotes, blank ballots, crossovers (primary only), etc. A master sheet showing the 8 44;L variations in votes must be done. The results are then compared with the machine count to determine if the machine is counting accurately. This is very time consuming. 8. Applications for Absentee Ballots are obtained from City Hall or the County and sent to the City or the County to be filled. The ballots Aro,then sent from City Hall or the County to the app llt or are picked up at City *call or the County. Th+s . Votsr then casts his /her ballot and returns the sesls0;fnvolope either in person or by mailing it. Those ballots are then held unopened until election day. 9. City Hall is open for absentee balloting the Saturday before an election fro& 1:00 P.K. to 3 :00 P.M. and on the Monday before election until 7.130 P.M. 10. The Monday before the Tuesday oloation is when each precinct must be set up (all voting booths and miscellaneous supplies) and keys gust be obtained for the various precincts. The locker ballot boxes with the vote tabulators (the memory packs are sealed in the tabulators to insure they have not been tampered with) and blank ballots inside (these are also sealed in boxes) are delivered to the precincts. The Election Precinct Chairperson picks up the remaining precinct supplies (forms to be filled out, envelopes each form must be in, etc.) on Monday night. 11. Election day arrives for Linda and I at 5:30 A.M. I spend mist of the morning monitoring each precinct to be sure everything is run ;ling smoothly, answering any questions that come up and straightening out any 443 9 s ��y "'. ' � x 4 problems that arise. Linda takes care of any phone questions from the public on precinct locations, etc. 12. All absentee ballots are counted on the equipment in the precincts. This not being a normal General Election the Absentee Ballots for the Governor's race were counted by hand. During the primary there were 26 absentee ballots and during the general there were 195 absentee ballots. We had a team of judges at City Hall trained to review the applications and ballot envelopes to determine if the ballot was rejected or accepted based on the completeness of the required information. After that process was complete, the ballots in the ballot envelopes were sent out to each precinct to be opened and run thru the machine at the close of the polls. 13. After the polls close, the judges check and verify the seal numbers on the memory pack to be sure it is the same as it was opening the polls. They then take the "A" (answer key) key, insert it in the vote tabulator and turn it. The vote tabulator will not accept any more ballots. A printout of vote totals will then begin. This is the Official Results Tape. It contains t`.o zero tape from the beginning of the day, any messages, and the total votes for each candidate or question. Mound historically has a good turn -out to vote. In the General Election 70% of the registered voters voted. • This year with all the unexpected changes in the election the precincts did not report back to City Ball until after 11:00 P.M. That, though, is not the end of the day because the judges must 10 444 bring certain supplies and items back to City Hall some of which goes to Hennepin County that night. There are many more clerical tasks than mentioned above that have to be done for an election, but as you can see it is a very time consuming job that requires accuracy and efficiency to run properly. By the time election day is over, Linda and I usually have put in 16 -20 hours each. This year, because of the pcssibility of the use of stickers, we did not have the voter insert his or her ballot into the vote tabulator. This was done to prevent any loose sticker from Jamming the machine and causing it to be inc_,erable. Thus, after the close of the polls, each ballot needed to be looked at to see if it contained a sticker or the voter voted on the Optec Scan ballot for Governor /Lt. Governor. If a sticker was present, the judges were instructed to duplicate that ballot and write in the name or names of the candidates on the sticker. Another item that slowed things down was that the Governor's race was printed on a supplemental white ballot and had to be hand counted as a paper ballot. The day after the election is getting the resolution and forms ready for the Canvassing Meeting, The City Canvassing Board (City Council) only canvasses city elections and special city elections. We had a number of meetings before the 1990 elections completing the above. We will be having more meetings early in 1991 to identify equipment and programming changes that will allow the overall operation to function more efficiently. This work will continue in 1991. A video for training the voter on the new equipment was aired on 0 445 11 cable T.V. and used as a t '.ic relations tool. The public seems P p to have gotten used to the new equipment and we did have some people who were disappointed that they could not insert their own ballot into the equipment. The last three year3 I have been on the League of Minnesota Cities Elections and Ethics Committee. This office arranges for the publication of official and legal notices for such things as public hearings, changes ii meeting dates for the City Council, ordinances, and any other items that are required by State Statutes or that the Council or City Manager feel should be in the official newspaper. Some public notices (vacating of streets, etc.) must also be posted in 3 public places. The Park Dept. handles the posting and fills out the posting affidavit. Some bids come through my office and are advertised according to State Statute. Some of the specifications for bids for equipment are laid out and prepared by me with input from the specific department head requesting the item. LICENSES i PERNITB The City of Mound issued 96 licenses or permits for 21 different purposes in 1990. This accounted for approximately $3,914.00 in revenues. Gayle Burns in the Finance Department spends a � considerable amount of time in the administration of the licenses and permits, i.e. notices and renewal forms are sent before they 12 1 1 t t expire; when'the renewal application is received it and the insurance papers must be gone over to be sure they are correct; the payment receipt is made out; the names submitted to the Council for review and approval; the license issued and sent to the applicant. Then there are always the applicants who wait until the last minute or have to be coaxed to get their applications and fees in before expiration. I have found being City Clerk that people expect me to be the local expert in everything from utility costs to the legality of the latest zoning fracas. In attending State and International conferences I find that most city clerks are used as an information source by lc.;al citizens. I try to stay informed as to what is going on in all aspects and departments of the City so that if I cannot answer a question for a citizen at least I can direct them to the proper person for an answer. What comes along with public information is research into various items that people have concerns about. RECORDS MANAGEMENT Records Management is a function concerned with the creation, processing, maintenance, protection, retrieval, retention, preservation and disposition of records required in the operation and continuance of city operations. The objective is to save space, money and time. The City owns a microfiche recorder (camera), film processor and a dry irk reader /printer. We have been using this equipment for 441 13 Police records that must be kept and require too much space; for all old permanent records of the City Council i.e., resolutions, Uinutes, etc. We will continue to work at this in 1991. US ZOVEIT DRonRTY In 1990, I dealt with 9 tax forfeit parcels of land. a 0 - parcels were released to sale to adjoining property owners; 8 - parcels were conveyed to the city for park /wetlands, drainage, or unbrildable; 1 - parcel was released for public auction; Hennepin County notifies us of property within the City that has gone tax forfeit because of nonpayment of real estate taxes. They also periodically ask about property we have taken for a public purpose to insure that we are using it for that public purpose. The County asks that we inform them cf what we would like done with the property i.e., allow the parcels to the sold at public auction; require that they be sold only to adjoining property owners if they are undersized or do not meet the zoning and building codes; or retain them for some public purpose. There is a considerable amount of research that must be done to determine what should be done with the property. The first step is to go to the tax books and get a property descriptioji. Then the property jacket is pulled and its contents examined to see if the property was taken for a public purpose or is a new tax forfeit parcel. The next step is to figure the square footage of the property and look at the current zoning district to determine if it is a 14 449 buildable lot or not. After all this information is determined, it is all put on a sheet, a plat map showing the property is made and sent to the City Engineer, Park Director, Street Superintendent, Sewer & Water Superintendent, Building Inspection and Finance Director for their comments and recommendations. Occasionally, an easement is needed for utility purposes; a survey may be needed to determine if part of the property is in the wetlands; or there may be reasons for the City to retain the property. The Special Assessment Clerk in the Finance Dept. determines if there are any assessments from before forfeiture or since forfeiture that need to be put back on the property. The reason we need to know assessments before and since forfeiture is that the City gets 90% of the purchase price to apply to assessments from before forfeiture. The assessments since forfeiture are added in their entirety to the appraised value (determined by the . Hennepin County Assessor) of the property. In 1984, the City Council adopted a resolution ( #84 -94, copy attached) setting a policy on assessments placed on undersized tax forfeit property before forfeiture. This has helped to encourage adjoining property owners to purchase undersized parcels and combine them with their property. In 1987 I completed a card index by Property Identification Number for the following: 1. City.owned property; 2. Tax forfeit property that has been retained by the City for a public purpose; 3. Tax forfeit property that falls into t,.e following categories: a. Property released for public sale; • b. Property for sale only to and combined with 441 15 adjoining property. Each card has a PID (property identification number), plat and parcel, legal description, status (what it is, park, wetlands, tax forfeit, etc.), whose name it is in (State Land. Dept. or City of Mound or both), any resolutions dealing with the parcel (resolution number and disposition). I have now completed coordinating Lhe Certificates of Titles, State Deeds, easements, etc. and recorded that type of information on each card also. This card file, is now complete and is being kept up -to -date. It has already proved to be a very valuable tool when someone calls in to check on a parcel of land. Since we started dealing with tax forfeit property in 1982: 35 parcels have been put up to public auction; 34 parcels were retained for a public purpose; and 79 parcels have been authorized to be sold to and combined with adjoining properties; 5 temporary construction easements were reconveyed. • Of the above, 30 parcels of the 34 have been sold at public auction and 41 of the 79 parcels have been sold to adjoining property owners to be combine with their property. I think this shows how this process is working to the city's advantage to get parcels back on the tax rolls and increase conformance to the zoning ordinance. We now have a computer program called Rapid File and I am trying to get all this information on tax forfeit property into the computer. I will continue to work on this during 1991. 16 450 OTHER DUTI ESIREOPONSIBILI TIES DGE • In 1990, the inputting of all budget pages was done for all departments. This included all figures for 1989, 1990 and inserting all proposed 1991 figures. There was also preparation of the Election Budget and joint work with the City Manager on the City Council Budget and the Manager /Clerk Budget. In 1988, I officially took over the Mound Union Cemetery records. In 1990, there were 16 burials and 16 graves were sold. In 1989, I used the Rapid File program in my computer and inputted all the information from each division of the cemetery. All the • information came off the cemetery cards which were checked and cross - checked. This now allows us to instantly locate people by name, owner of the grave, or lot and grave number. There are three divisions and each is separate on the computer. I have a book that I update every few months. It took a considerable amount of time to do this but I feal it has really cut down on the paper work. We had new cemetery maps made up at the end of 1990 to include all new information. FIRE CONTRACTS The Fire Department keeps track of all fire reports for each contracting city. The fire reports are all listed according to . the City and the number of fire /rescue hours. In 1990, there 451 17 were 215 mutual aid hours which are divided equally between qu y n the contracting cities. The Fire Contract Material is figured on a combination percentage of assessed value and a 3 year average of fire /rescue hours for each contracting city. That percentage is then used on: A. Operating Costs B. Capital Outlay C. Fireman's Relief Fund D. Fire Truck Payments In 1990, the fire hours breakdown is as follows: ACTUAL EQUAL CONTRACTING FIRE /RESCUE MUTUAL AID CITY HOURS + HOURS = TOTAL PERCENTAGE Minnetonka Beach 429 + 35.83 = 464.83 4.05% Minnetrista 1538 + 35.83 = 1573.83 13.70% Orono 1133 + 35.83 = 1168.83 10.18% Shorewood 12 + 35.83 = 47.83 .42% Spring Park 1503 + 35.83 = 1538.83 13.40% Mound 6655 + 35. - 6690. 58.25 TOTAL 11,270 + 114.98 = 11,484.98 100.00% These hours will be integrated into the 3 year average when the 1992 contract material is figured. Part of the formula for figuring the fire contracts was to use the total assessed value of the fire area in a community. This . changed this year from assessed value to market value, which did not change the percentages much but required some language change 18 4 01000*z in the original fire contracts and at the same time this was done some other changes were made to update the contract for each fire contracting city. EMPLOYEE SUPERVISION The City Manager and I supervise the Secretary /Receptionist, Linda Strong. As I stated in the beginning of this report, Ed and I share Linda's time. Linda is first and foremost the receptionist who answers the phone anywhere from 60 to 80 times a day, fielding calls to the proper people, taking messages when people are out of the office and directing people when they come into City Hall. She is sometimes the only contact a citizen has With City Hall and she is excellent in giving people a positive and helpful image of the City of Mound. is She does a lot of typing for departments who do not have secretarial help, i.e. Finance, Liquor, and the Dock Inspector. She is also in charge of handling all incoming and outgoing mail; copying for various departments; office supply ordering; as well as the duties that were mentioned before. We are lucky to have someone who is versatile, talented and friendly. MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL ASSE In September assessment hearing notices were prepared, the tax books checked to verify names and addresses and notices were written, published and sent to all parties concerned regarding the following: 0 153 19 CBD (Central Business District) Parking Maintenance Unpaid Tree Removal Charges Unpaid Mowing Charges Delinquent Water & Sewer Charges Unpaid Clean -Up Charges Denbigh Road Improvement Project Supplemental Sewer Connection Supplemental Water Connection The CBD Assessment Roll is a very involved procedure. The expenses are figured from June 1 of a given year until May 31 of the year being assessed. This figure includes expenses for railroad ?ease, special assessments, maintenance materials, crosswalks striping, blacktopping of lots, Christmas decorations, lighting of lots, parking lot leases, salaries for maintenance. This figure is sent to each business in the CBD District. There is a very complicated formula for spreading these expenses between the businesses in the Central Business District. The formula is based on the following: 1. Customer parking spaces required (this is determined by 2. 3 . 4. 5. 6. 7 . 8. 9. 10. 11. the CBD Parking Committee based on the business). Employee parking spaces required. The number of spaces provided by the business. The first 2 items are added together and the third is subtracted. A percentage of the total is then figured on item #4. The business front footage is then taken. A percentage of the total is then figured on item #6. The present market value is then taken. A percentage of the total is then figured on item #8. Next the total costs (expenses) are multiplied by the factor .7 and that result is multiplied by item #5. Next the total costs (expenses) are multiplied by the 20 451 factor .15 and that 12. Next the total co factor .15 and that 13. Items 10, 11 and 12 what is proposed to CBD. • result is multiplied by item #7. sts (expenses) are multiplied by result is multiplied by item #9. are then added together and that is be assessed to each business in the Resolutions were prepared for all the above assessments. Levy sheets were prepared for Hennepin County, resolutions certified and all sent to the County to appear on the 1991 tax statements. In August everyone in City Hall packed up and was moved to the new addition. Quotes were obtained from two different moving companies. It was an interesting Fall with all the construction and remodeling and trying to carry on with business as usual. I think we managed quite well and all worked together to make, things as easy as possible under the circumstances. We moved back into the remodeled area on December 1st. Since that time the emphasis has been on completion and correction of items that were or were not done properly. There has been alot of time spent trying to rectify problems. OTHER MEETINGS ATTENDED MCFOA (Minnesota Clerks# Finance Officerst Association) Annual Meeting I have been a member of this organization since 1982. I was Regional Vice President for Region IV in 1984; Treasurer in 1985; . Secretary in 1986; Vice President in 1987; became the President 4,55 21 in 1988; and a Director at Large (Immediate Past President) 1989 and 1990. This state organization has one annual conference in March which is put on by the University of Minnesota Department of Professional Development and Conference Services. It is designed to meet the needs of Minnesota clerks from large, small and medium size cities, with different responsibilities, and with varying years of experience. The technical sessions provide practical information and an opportunity for discussion with other clerks. I received the title of MCMC (Minnesota Certified Municipal Clerk) in March 1985 after completing the required courses and extra seminars offered by the University of Minnesota Continuing Education. Out of the 855 cities in Minnesota there are over 550 members in . MCFOA. IIMC (International Institute of Municipal Clerks) Conference I have been a (CMC) Certified Municipal Clerk since November 1985. The State of Minnesota presently has over 345 member cities in the IIMC. We are 9th out of 77 (including the 50 states, 12 Canadian provinces, and 15 other countries such as Australia, New Zealand, Israel, United Kingdom, South Africa, Japan) in membership to IIMC. Total IIMC membership is over 9,868 up 249 over 1989. I attended the annual IIMC Conference from May 20 - May 25. The theme this year was "Learning, Changing, Sharing ", and was reflected in the variety of topics coverr_d in the educational sessions, presentations and the extensive exhibits. This was a . very interesting and beneficial conference with over 40 different workshops in excellence in local government, records management, 22 151 local government productivity, election professional development, personnel management, communications, supervising, to name a few. At the IIMC Conference I was elected to the Board of Directors representing Region VI (Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin). This is a three year terra. I have also been appointed co -chair of the IIMC Election /Legislation Committee which will monitor Federal election legislation. THO I attended the Region VI Meeting in LaCrosse, Wisconsin because it is central to the three states (Iowa, WiscOnsin and Minnesota) in our region. Marian Karr (Iowa City, Iowa) and myself . conducted this meeting as Region VI Directors for IIMC. This gives us a chance to bring information we obtained at the IIMC Mid -Year Board Meeting back to our fellow members. The expenses for attendance at these meetings was paid for entirely by MCFOA because I am a board member. Some of the other meetings attended were: - League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Conference. - League of Minnesota Cities policies & Priorities Meeting. League of Minnesota Cities Elections & Ethics Committee. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities legislative update meeting. Several meetings with BRC (Business Records Corporation) on the Optec IIIP voting machine �s 1 23 maintenance agreements. IIMC Mid -Year Board Meeting. I have tried to highlight some of the activities in 1990. In summation, the City Clerk's position encompasses many areas that require time, effort and knowledge beyond that of a clerk in a larger city with a full staff to do the elementary tasks. I find the work very challenging and personally rewarding and I am happy I Can contribute to Mound and its citizens. I feel continuing education, working on various committees with affiliated organizations, receiving and sharing information with other cities makes as more effective in my position and I want to thank the Council for their support. fc u 24 459 132 June 12, 1984 RESOLUTION NO. 84 -94 RESOLUTION SETTING A POLICY ON ASSESSMENTS PLACED ON TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY BEFORE FORFEITURE WHE.1EAS. Hennepin County has begun to notify adjacent property owners that they will be conducting "private sales" on undersized or unbuildable lots; and WHEREAS* some of these properties had assessments against them before forfeiture which were cancelled at the time of forefeiture; and WHEREAS. when the City releases these parcels for private sale, it certifies these assessments from before forfeiture to Hennepin County because the City receives 80% of the value of the property (selling price) to apply to the old assessments; and WHEREAS, the assessments since forfeiture are added to the appraised value so the City receives all the funds for those assessments; and 1] WHEREAS, some of the assessments from before forfeiture are higher than the property is valued at and thus does not make the property very attractive to adjoining property owners unless we make a committment to them that we will not reassess the remaining balance of the assessments after they purchase the property; and WHEREAS, the goal is to get the property back on the tax role and help a number of people make their property conforming. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following policy which will apply only to undersized tax forfeit lots which are sold thru Hennepin County and combined with adjoining property: 1. On undersized tax forfeit lots which had assessments before forfeiture, the City will certify these assessments to Hennepin County when the lots are released for private sale to adjoining property owners. This will be done only so that the City will receive 80% of the value of the lot to be applied against these before forfeiture assessments. 2. After certain undersized tax forfeit lots are sold and comtkned with adjoining property, the owner may petition the City Council to pass a resolution stating that the balance of the assessments from before forfeiture will not be recertified to 4151 133 June 12. 1934 Hennepin County for collection. The foregoing resolution was moved by Councilmember Charon and seconded by Councilmember Paulsen. The following Counci?.members voted in the affirmative: Charon. Jesseri. Paulsen and Polston. The following Councilmembers voted in the negative: none. Councilmember Peterson was absent and excused. -- Mayor - Atiest: City Clerk • • 440 a .ask �loksd ?Jal�cn�s ��► �l�pa��r 2415 Wilshire Blvd., mound, Minnesota 55364 February 11, 1991 TO: Mayor Skip Johnson Mound City Council City Manager, Ed Shukle FROM: Dan Bryce, Fire Chief 1990 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT ANNUAL REPORT Fire and rescue calls were up 32% from last year, 1990 is our record chi calls with 228 fire and 274 rescue, total of 502 calls. Over all up 32% an fire and up 43% on rescues. Needless to say "we have MOVED INTO the Fire Station`!! In Mound we were up 43% on fires and up 30% on rescues from 1989. The majority of our calls were for Mound which was 304 fire and rescues. Thsts 65X of the calls. Had $ 216,000.00 valuation fire loss in Mound. The breakdown for the contract cities is: MINNETONKA BEACH -tip 7X on fires and up 33% on rescues (15 fires 6 4 rescues). $ 0 valuation fire loss. MINNETRISTA - up 77% on fir -_s and up 88% on rescues, (32 fires and 34 rescues). They had $ 135,500.00 valuation fire loss. ORONO - down 41X an fires and up 77% on rescues (29 fires 6 16 rescues). They had $ 89,000,00 valuation fire • loss. SHOREWOOD - down 100% on fire and down 50% on rescues (0 fires 6 1 rescue). Their fire loss was $ 0 . SPRING PARK - up 14% on fires and up 57X on rescues (31 fires b 33 rescues). Their fire loss valuation was $ 37,180.00. Tine total for the contract cities is 1C7 fires and 88 rescues, up 28X from 1989. Mutual Aid we were down on calls that we received and up one ca!l that we gave to. So basically even from last year. Received 3 and gave 3. Except for total man hours up 34% in us giving. The 3 calls we received from was with thole Plain and basically because on tankers for water supply and for day time, on man power. Again I can't stress enough the importance of mutual aid, especially during the day, not so much for Mound Fire Department but for surrounding areas. Some can't beg, borrow or steal good committed day time fire fighters. Alot of cities do allow their maintenance to be on their volunteer fire depts. Training for the year consist of our drills, twice a month, WAFTA (through their smoke house, gas evolutions) and burnings of houses - excellent training. We had £ go to Sta.e Fire School, 2 to Fire Instructors School in Cincinnati, 7 to State wire C in Bemidji. All had First Responders and Responders Refresher Course. Had 11 certified in Fire Fighters I and 22 in Fire Fighters II. Three went wid passed for Et-IT (Emergency Medical Technician). Two to State Fire Chiefs Conference in Duluth and I went to International Fire Chiefs in Orlando, Florida in August. Asst. Fire Marshal went to a Arson School and Fire Mrirshal want to Fire Safety Education School. • 4W pie 2 Cant. !laintdrAwe to our equipment is done by our own men at the Fire Station, except for the few major repairs. We still have the 3 men that we call heavy maintenance and we have four groups of 7 -8 men in a group, that clean the station and do rotator repairs and check everything on the trucks like tires, pumps, oil, gas/ deal, deck hoses etc. We've had a busy, ,good, hardship, exciting, tiring year. With the 502 calls, 37Z were actual fires, 26% were false alarms, 26% were fire alarms and 11% were of miscellaneous calls. For the 274 rescues, 15% were canceled, 3% were DOA'S and 72 were at the. same address. We had 152 daytime calls, with an average of 13 personal and average response time was 5 minutes, (average response time is, time of call to time on the scene). We had 199 night calls, average personal of 2+4 and average response time was 5 minutes. Week -end we had 151 calls, average peresaasl 22 and average response time again was 5 minutes. We used our #1 pumper #1S, 217 tines, our rescue 11 19, 281 times, our old equip. truck # 14, 93 times, but`U M' truck / 22 has been used 26 times. All of the other equipment used totaled 95. We Md one of our active young men died. A fire where one of our firefighters was ,b tudod to the hospital for electrocution (which everything tuned out OK). Minor JnJuries Of bade, cuts and strains. Our new Heavy Rescue /Equipment Truck came in. A * OW part time secretary that works at the fire station three days a week, which Is s new experience for a few of the men to accept! But to me with the demand of papal vork City, State, State Fire Marshal reports, telephone calls, to keep the proper work in order has eased a load off of me, so I can satisfy 36 men which is not an easy task!!!! Along with the training we have more meetings to attend: Mutual aid, United Fln Fighters, WAFTA (Western Area Fire Training Academy), Fire Relief, $enaepin County Chief's, Great Lake Fire Chiefs, and I an on the Hennepin County Advisory Board. Also I try to attend most council meetings from our contracting cities once. or twice a year. I have finally a full roster of fire fighters - 37!! 94k of dedicated, hard- working, caring excellent individuals. I hope I don't lose any this year to retirement or job replacements etc! These men are eager and willing to put 1002 into the fire service. They were so excited of the new addition and "dressing up" the front of the station, BUT - - - with the WAR and State -cut backs to the City, we the Fire Department with the smallest budget of the largest working force has to wait - - - again!!!!! I was $ 10,835.08 UNDER budget for 1990. Total for the year $223,396.34. Budget total was $ 234,290.00. This did not include the cost of the new truck which the cost was $ 203,085.00. This is my 7th year as Fire Chief, and all but one year I have been under budget!! (That one year was because of buying the chassis for the rescue truck that was budgeted for the following year.) the Fire Department Relief Association continued to monitor investments, trying to maximize returns without exposing the special fund to any significant risk. Due to the death of a firefighter in 1990, the Relief Board implemented the survivor's benefit for the first time since the pension program has been effective. Retirement benefits were increased to $395.00 per rxmth in 1990, while City contribution increases were cut back to 4% - the approximate cost of living. . Time will tell if future increases to benefits will be significently impacted by this change in the City contribution increases. Elections in 1990 left the Relief Board unchanged and all officer's were re- elected to their previous positions. 44A. Alovnd Vol ode" liu %AA& imemi A 11'r 2415 Wilshire Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 FIREFIGHTER A D D R E S S CITY PHONE DOB ENTRY ANDERSEN JEFF 2221 SOUTHVIEW LN MOUND 55364 472 -7564 07/10/57 09/22/80 ANDERSON GREG 4924 PLYMOUTH RD MOUND 55364 472 -7225 11/18/60 12/03/79 BABE GERALD 2169 BIRCH LN MOUND 55364 472 -2858 08/27/40 C9/09/74 BOYD DAVID 5936 GUMWOJD RD MOUND 55364 472 -4515 01/30/52 02/03/75 BRYCE DON 4820 CANTEBURY RD MOUND 55364 472 -4085 12/04/42 05/03/65 BRYCE SCOTT 5955 IDLEWOOD RD MOUND 55364 472 -3622 01/09/57 01/09/78 CARLSON DAVID 6365 ACORN RD MOUND 55364 472 - 5485 10/17/51 04/05/76 CASEY JIM 4968 AFTON RD MOUND 55364 472 - 1750 09/25/55 09/12/88 COLLINS STEVE 1121 GRANDVIEW BLVD MOUND 55364 472 - 5267 09/08/50 02/06/78 DAVID MIKE 2163 DIAMOND LN MOUND 55364 472 - 4320 02/04/41 08/02/64 ENGELHART RANDY 5200 SULGROVE RD MOUND 55364 472 -7615 03/15/61 04/02/90 ERICKSON STEVE 4367 SHORELINE DR SP.PK 55384 471 -7129 10/28/49 11/03/75 FISK PHILIP 4790 CARRICK RD MOUND 55364 472 -5173 03/09/67 05 /01 /8S GARVAIS GERALD 4691 PAISLEY RD. MOUND 55364 472 -2374 11/27/51 07/02/73 GAADY DAN 2501 EMERALD DR. MOUND 55364 472 -4060 05/07/56 12/03./90 GRADY KEVIN 760 APPLEGARDEN RD MOUND 55364 472 -4058 07/30/61 06/06/88 HENDERSON CRAIG 4435 DORCHESTER RD MOUND 55364 472 -3361 09/18/57 11/01/76 EtENRY PAUL 5056 SUL-GROVE RD MOUND 55364 472 - 5306 11/24/53 05/01/89 LANDSMAN BRAD 2212 FAIRVIEW LN MOUND 55364 472 - 1817 02/15/52 03/04/74 MARSCHKE RON 2207 NOBLE LN MOUND 55364 472 -3815 07/18/41 03/04/74 NAFUS JOHN 2580 DUNWOODY LN WAY 55391 471 -7432 05/10/54 06/0 C NELSON JNMES 2025 SHOREWOOD LN MOUND 55364 472 -3500 01/21/71 12/ NELSON MARV 2025 SHOREWOOD LN MOUND 55364 472 - 3500 08/19/50 11 /0 5 NICCUM BRET 2449 OAKLAWN RD MOUND 55364 472 -1983 12/09/65 07/1O/85 OPITZ BUD 2041 BELAIRE LN MOUND 55364 472 -2736 07/02/42 06/01/7( PALM GREG 2153 LANGDON LN MOUND 55364 472 -1236 04/17/61 02/06/84 PALM MIKE 2695 WESTEDGE BLVD MOUND 55364 472 -1972 07/14/59 06/04/75 PALM TIM 4879 WILSHIRE BLVD MOUND 55364 472 -2398 07/16/65 05/01/8 PEDERSON GREG 6087 ASPEN RD MOUND 55364 472 -5785 02/22/53 02/03/7 RASMUSSEN TONY 5924 IDLEWOOD RD. MOUND 55364 472 - 2912 05/02/59 03/04/8' SAVAGE MIKE 3125 HIGHLAND BLVD MOUND 55364 472 - 3591 03/08/50 09/15/8f SIPPRELL KEVIN 2205 BAYVIEW PL WAY 55391 471 - 8659 08/31/65 03/05/9( STALLMAN RON 2201 CENTERVIEW LN MOUND 55364 472 -7904 03/18/64 01/05/87 SWENSON BILL 4387 WILSHIRE BLVD MOUND 55364 x'72 -7061 06/26/49 07/02/73 SWENSON TOM 4387 WILSHIRE BLVD MOUND 5564 472 -7061 06/26/49 09/08/75 WILLIAMS RICK 5940 HILLCREST LN MOUND 55364 472 -7170 07/08/60 11/07/8' WILLIAMS TIM 3135 AYR LN MOUND 55364 472 -6716 02/03/62 11/07/8; under 0 -" 8 0.0 -,2 9 �� 30 - 39 qxS Sv 7mRU 40 1/0V A C T I V E S E N I O R I T Y R 0 S T E R 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mond, Minnesota 55364 A C T I Al E S E N I O R I T Y R 0 S T E R FIREFIGHTER ENTRY DATE ILI � o g 1 MIKE DAVID 08/02/64 f) 0 2 DON BRYCE 05/03/65 3_ BUD OPITZ 06/01/70 t 4 JERRY GARVAIS 5 BILL SWENSON 07/02/73 6 BRAD LANDSMAN 03/04/74 a 0 7 / RON MARSCHKE 03/04/74 O 8 JERRY BABB 09/09/74 v 7 9 DAVE BOYD 02/03/75 10 GREG PEDERSON 02/03/75 11 TOM SWENSON 09/08/75 12 STEVE ERICKSON 11/03/75 1 3 MARV NELSON 11/03/75 11 DAVE CARLSON 64/05/ 15 CRAIG HENDERSON 11/01/76 16 . SCOTT BRYCE 01/09/78 17 STEVE COLLINS 02/06/78 Y O 18 MIKE PALM 06/04/79 M RCS 19 GREG ANDERSON 12/03/79 �& 20 JOHN NAFUS 06/02/80 21 MIKE SAVAGE 09/15/80 22 JEFF ANDERSEN 09/22/80 23 TIM WILLIAMS 11/07/ 24 RICK WILLIAMS 11/07/83 0'- M01t v d 25 GREG PALM 02/06/84 n3 /n4/85 `,oLs / 26 27 TONY RON RASMUSSEN STALLMAN 01/05/87 28 KEVIN GRADY 06/06/88 ASS 29 JIM CASEY 09/12/88 30 PAUL HENRY 05/01/89 77 `0 31 PHIL FISK 05/01/89 32 7if TIM PALM 05/01/89 �j yfols 33 BRET NICCUM 07/10/89 34 KEVIN SIPPRELL 03/02/90 35 RANDY ENGELHART 04/02/90 36 DAN GRADY 12/03/90 37 JAMES NELSON 12/03/90 1/0V A C T I V E S E N I O R I T Y R 0 S T E R Nomo d ' O&Kl "4 4i vas $ AWAOA , YAW, 2415 Wilshire Blvd., Mound, Minnesota 55364 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU REPORT 1990 FIRE MARSHAL GERALD BABB Fire Department Fire Prevention Inspections are conducted by the Fire Prevention Bureau for the cities of Mound, Minnetonka Beach, Minnetrista, Orono, Spying Park and Shorewood. Occupancies inspected include place of public assembly, educational, institutional, residential, (except the interior of dwelling unless invited by the owner for a hone firesafety check). Mercantih, business, industrial, manufacturing, storage and special hazards structures. The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code Sec. 2.201 states: Fire Prevention Bureau shall inspect, as often as may be necessary, all buildings and premises. Including such other hazards or appliances as the Chief may designate for the purpose of ascertaining and causing to be corrected by condition which would reasonable tend to cause fire or contribute to its spread, or any violation of the purpose or provisions of this code and of any other law or standard affecting fire safety. Other areas of inspections included but not limited to are: Pre - School, Day - Care, Foster Care, underground and above ground tanks and five schools in the Fire Departments district. The State Fire Marshals Division of public education has asked all local Fire Marshals to help with the newly formed State Division which was inacted O in legislation to inspect all schools in the State. The Fire Prevention bureau also investigates the origin and cause of all fires. Fire prevention is a responsibility shared by all components of the fire service. The Minnesota Uniform Fire Code Sec. 2.203 states: The Fire Department shall investigate promptly the cause, origin and circumstances of each and every fire occumng in the jurisdiction involving loss of life or injury to person or destruction or damage to property and, if it appears to the Bureau of Investigation that such a fire is of suspicious origin, they shall then - immediate charge of all physical evidence relating to the cause of ti re and shall pursue the investigation to its conclusion. The Police Department shall assist the Fire Department in its investigations whenever requested to do so, unless otherwise directed by the Chzief of Police. Other areas the Fire Prevention Bureau included are, Code Inforcement, Public and Private Education, plan review with City Inspectors along with inspections and meetings with State, County, City Officials and working with public and private utilities, US Goverrznent and the court systems. Sunmary of Hours all Cities (6) Fire Marshal and Asst. Fire Marshal JERRY MIKE Inspections (including residential) 220 hrs 70 hrs . Investigations 130 hrs 35 hrs Prevention- Education 180 hrs 25 lirs Other (Plan reviews, meetings etc) 120 hrs 80 hrs 44s Fire Prevention Week 3 other firefighters approx 70 hrs. February 21, 1991 Honorable Mayor, City Council and City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: 1990 ANNUAL REPORT PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT Dear Mayor, Council and City Manager: It Is with great pleasure I present to you this Annual Report of the Planning & Inspections Department. It is our hope that this report will supply City Management with enough data to study and then decide and direct this department Its course of action in the coming years. We welcome any comments, suggestions or questions you may have. Respectful , O n her land Building Official JS:pj • `144 PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 0 1990 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE OF DEPARTMENT . . . . . . . . . . 1^ ORGANIZATIONAL CHART . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 PERSONNEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - S CONSTRUCTION A C T I V I T Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 7 i PLANNING & ZONING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - 8 COMPLAINTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 EDUCATION AND TRAINING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 -!0 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 ANNUAL BUILDING PERMIT COUNT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibit A TOTAL YEARLY VALUES OF NEW CONSTRUCTION . . . . . . . . Exhibit B NEW HOUSING UNITS (1974 - 1990) . . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibit C VACANT PARCELS IN THE CITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibit D is 0 ESTABLISHMENT AND PURPOSE OF PLANNING AND INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT This department is established as an official part of city governmer Its purpose is to assist the general put) Iic and en- force the provisions of the Mound City Code, Zoning Ordinance, State Building Code, and related state statutes and regulations. a. Planning - To Prepare for the Future. For the development and implementation of the comprehensive plan to guide the physical development of the municipality to maintain and enhance the City as a good place to live, work, play and grow. To assist In the evolution of regulations at the local. state, and federal level to insure they are Just and fulfill the intent of protection of life safety health and welfare for the citizens of our community and posterity. b. Building Insoec&Ions - To Regulate and Maintain in a Safe Condition. To provide minimum standards to safeguard life and limb, health, property and public welfare by regulating and con- trolling the design, construction, quality of materials used and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all structures within this Jurisdiction. C. Application is the construction, alteration, moving, demolition, repair and use of any building or structure within the municipality. d. Authorit Is established by the City Code. Its duty is to serve the public by careful application and enforcement of the regula- tions adopted by the City. With the guidance of the plan- ning commission and city council and under the direction of the City Manager. • U8 PLANNING b INSPECTIONS DEPARTNENT O RGANIZATION Council Members: MOUND CITY COUNCIL Mayor: Steve Smith CITIZENS OF MOUND Liz Jensen Skip Johnson Phyllis Jessen Andrea Ahrens CITY MANAGER Ed Shukle POLICE 6 FIRE DEPT June Hyland Don Bryce Jerry Babb Mike Palm Judy Bryce BUILDING OFFICIAL Jon Sutherland CITY PLANNER STATE AND COUNTY '%GENCIES Mark Koegler, State Electrical Inspector VanDoren, Hazard, County Haith Inspector b Stallings, Inc. County Planning 6 Deveopment • PLANNING COMMISSION Chair, Bill Meyer V. Chair, Geoff Michael Jerry Clapsaddle Ken Smith Michael Mueller Bill Thal Frank Weiland "Bill Foss Council Rep., Liz Jensen SUPPORT STAFF Peggy James John Breitner Metro West Insp. CITY ENGINEER John Cameron, McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. • - 2 - 441 oacq The Planning and Inspections Department has two full time employees, a Building Official and a Secretary: a. Building Official, Jon Sutherland EDUCATION: • University of Minnesota. Minneapolis /St. Paul 1974 - 1976, General College. • Union Carpentry Apprenticeship Program '978 - 1984. • North Hennepin Community College, Bia i 1 d i ng Inspections - Technology, 1985 to Present. PRIOR EXPERIENCE: 7/90 - Present City of Mound Building Official 6/88 - 7/90 Iaant LCounty Building Official 7/87 - 6/88 City of Prior Lpke /Savage/Soott County, Building Inspector 4/87 - 7 -87 C i tv of White Bear Lake Internship - Building Inspector 4/86 - 4/87 Derrick Lard Co. Site Manager . 1978 - 1986 Varied construction experience, includ- ing union carpentry apprenticeship, two years electrical, and site management. ACHIEVEMENTS, DISTINCTIONS, HONORS, MEMBERSHIPS: o Member International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) o Member /Board of Director Lake Country Chapter iCBO, serving on several committees of the chapter o Certified Class 11 Building Official, State of Min- nesota o Certified on Site Sewage Treatment Systems MPCA o Member North Star Chapter iCBO o Member International Conference Plumbing & Mechanical Officials, both international and Local Chapters DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES: o Complete administration of inspections department as- sisting general public and contractors in application and interpretation of building codes and ordinances o Conduct all plan review permit issuance and related in- sp=ct'ins. • - 3 - Y)a • Responsible for enforcement of codes, laws, and or- dinances that establish basic and uniform performance standards that safeguard life safety, welfare, comfort, and security of the residents of this municipality. • Prepares and executes department budget. b. Secretary, Peggy James Peggy is the first contact with the public, answering a myriad of questions to assisting the general public with planning, zoning and building permit requirements. She keeps the Building Official's daily inspection schedule and insists the schedule be maintained in a timely manner. Some of Peggy's accomplishments during the year of 1990 are as follows: 1) She has inventoried the activity of underground storage tanks within the city, Including the location of ex- Isttng tanks, location of tanks which have been removed, the dates of Installation and removal, the gallon capacity and the contents. 2) The recording system for building permits has been con- verted from manual to computerized. All permits are now recorded into the Rapldfile program which makes it easier to retrieve specific Information, such as, a listing of ail the permits issued for swi:ming pools during the year. 3) Helped orientate and adapted to new Building Official. 4) Changed permit filing system by eliminating "Inspection cards" which only duplicated work. 5) Helped initiate and process two condemnations: 4748 Hampton Road and 2142 Belmont lane. In addition to Peggy's duties in Planning and inspections, she has worked a great deal with Jim Fackler of the Parks Department. In 1991 Peggy will keep track of hours working for each department. i look for Peggy to expand her present knowledge and duties in planning and zoning issues and interpretation of city or- dinances, zoning code and state regulations pertinent to this department to enhance her present abilities in serving the public and representing the City of Mound. Educat::iona1 opportunities that are available and within the constraints of staffing and the budget will be explored. 411 -4 - In addition to full time staff, the following personnel assist our department: a. Consultants City Planner Mark Koegler, Van Doren Hazard & :Dta 1 1 i nqs City Engineer John Cameron, McCombs Frank Roos & ASsoC. b. Part Time Building Inspections Plumbing Inspector Electrical Inspector Support Staff 40 Loren Kohnen, Metro West Inspection Service John Breitner Jerry Kurth Al Tollakson, State Board of Electricity June Hyland, Code Enforcement Police Department* (complaints, derelict auto- mobiles, and ordinance violations) C. Fire Department 1 Fire Chief Don Bryce Fire Marshal Jerry Babb Asst. Fire Marshal Mike Palm Secretary Judy Bryce *The Mound Police Department wi I I ass ISt the toil i:iinn c >t+-i cial on occasion, when needed. "Fire Department Is separate d i s t i n c t listed because of importance and i nt erne 1 ;,r i c,r; . 5 - T Yf f� C �ISTRUCTION ACTIVITY Below is a summary of budget and revenue for construction activity: REVENUE 1988 ACTUAL NON - BUSINESS 90,066 LICENSES b PERMITS EXPENDITURES 128,185 1989 ACTUAL 75,461 1960 1990 1991 BUD-K-T ACTUAL PROPOSEO 86,700 68,670 67,700 121,449 145,000 133,118 123,230 *Includes $13,000 purchase of new car. Building Activity is down and so it follows that revenues are down. Reflected in the increase of expenditures for 1990 Is the $13,000 purchase of a new car. The proposed revenue and expendi- ture for 1991 include a substantial cut mainly in professional services. Staff will do its best to keep in line +ith these cuts. • Planning snd Inspections will cover approximately 55% of the proposed expenditures through fees collected for services provided by this department. We are currently doing a comparison with other cities of our fee schedule to see if we are consistent and or need to raise the fee schedule. In 1 ":09v 262 permits were Issued for a total valuation of $4.466,866. This figure is down slightly (1 %) from construction activity in 1989 (see Exhibits A and 8). Residential construction valuation was $3,437.667. Our construc- tion activity is comprised principally of new single family dwellinos. There were 21 new single family dwellings constructed In 1990 (see Exhibit C). 3 in the Lost Lake Subdivision, 2 in Sinclair Court, 1 on Beachwood, 2 on Shorewood in the Three Points area, and the 13 other single family dwellings were scat- tered throughout the city. In addition, there were two homes demolished with new homes built on the valuable Lakeshore property. I expect this trend to continue. The numerous addi- tions, remodeling, decks, garages, and miscellaneous, make up the balance of the $3,437,667 In,ested into housing stock In the City of Mound. Commercial /non - residential construction valuation for 1990 was $1,029,199. Commercial activity was comprised principally of our own addition onto City Hall, in addition, Indian Knoll Manor was another miscellaneous remodel project. 0 6 - `I ?3 A • r� u i look to our latest subdivisions for new homes to be built, specifically, Bea_hwood Road and Sinclair Court. Drawing infor- mation from the City's Comprehensive Plan (see Exhibit D) it is noted that the construction of new housing uni in Picc..jnd is the result of the development of vacant land, including infill lots and the result of redevelopment through the removal of dilapidated housing units. At the present time, less than 9% of the land in the City is vacant that would eventually allow for another 400 to 500 units. The possible extensio;') of Chestnut Road may produce additional development along with the vacant land in the Westedge, Lost Lake. and Pelican Point areas, It is yet to be seen when any development may occur. Maintenance of existing housing stock is an important gcal of this department. kith the Economic Development C3mmisslon currently working on the revital'zation of the Central Business District, staff is looking forward to some excl-ing possibilititas in this area also. We anticipate the adopt i c r of + he ONR /LMCD Shore i and Ma; iagement Regulations and will adapt to �tever effect these regulations have or t h i s comrin i ty . PLANNING ANQ ZONING Planning Con mission members who served In 1990 sere: - Bill Meyer, rhair - Geoff M i c h a e l , Vice - Jerry Clapsadd!e - Michael Mueller - Bill Thal - Frank Weiland - Ken Sm i th - Bill Vass - Liz Jensen, Council Chair Representative The Planning Commission reviewed 43 zon.;ng cases in 1990. The City Council was in agreement with 100 percent of the Planning Cortmission's recommendations, with some amendments mire at the City Council level. Recommendations by staff to Planning Commission )nd City Counc - tl are Intended to lap in sync w i t h the compr.2hf?ns i ve plan. The Planning Commission and Staff has an aggressive attitude towards th^ future in conzinuiric work on housing maintenance regulations and he._ >e codes to better the community. Our conssj l ta, . Mark Koeg 1 er, c:ont i nues wor" of eon i ny code mod i f i cat i s ns t',at w i l l be brought to the C i t y %;our^ i l. 4 - 7 - 17y SUMMARY REPORTS PLAT+,!! I NG t IOM 1 NG CO"M I SS I OM a'?gRQ Of APPEALS 1 990 Approved Denied 41 /drawn Tabled Total Conditional Use Permit 4 4 Sub - division: Major (Repiat) l I Minor 4 4 Vacation 7 0 Variance 20 5 2 27 Wetland 12 0 Zoning Amendment 2 2 House Moving 3 0 Resolution Amt.idments 2 1 3 Variance Extensions 2 2 House Moving 0 TOTAL 38 7 1 3 43 1989 d roved Denied W/drawlj Tabl Total Conditional Use Permit 6 1 7 SubdIvIslon: Major (Replac) 3 3 Minor 6 1 ! g Vacation I 1 Variance' 19 6 ! 26 Wetland 0 Zoning Amendment 1 i 2 House Moving 2 2 TOTAL 38 7 1 3 49 1988 AQprov_ed De nied W drawn Tabled Total Conditional Use Permit 5 5 Sign 2 1 3 Subdivision,: Major (Repiat) 0 Minor 7 7 Vacation 5 5 Variance' 12 2 1 15 Wetland I 1 Zoning Amendment" 3 3 Grading I 1 TOTAL 35 4 0 1 40 • NOTE: The City Council's actions were in agreement with the Planning Commission's recommendations, with some amendments at the council level, as follows: 1990 = 1001 1989 = 921 1988 = 951 4W - 8 - Following is a brief recap on the number of complaints received resulting in violations of the Zoning Code, Garbage Collection Practices, and Nuisance Ordinance: 1989 Total Complaints . . . . . . . . 108 1990 Total Complaints . . . . . . . . 101 1990 Resolved Complaints To -date. . . 59 1990 Unresolved Coa*Iaints To -date. . 42 Not included in these figures are complaints related to viola- tions of the sign ordinance, building code, or issues addressed independently by staff or miscellaneous complaints handled by the Police Oeprrtment. Our record keepi,ig of complaints has not been adequately estab- Ilshed. We arµ currently keer'ng comprehensive records for 1991 and anticipate greatly enhan% , data retention with a proposed computer expansion. TI 'ep,r- mnt's goals for 1991 are as follows: 1) Revise /develop procedtare for nuisance abatement consis- tent with community spirit. 2) improve record keeping and tracking of complaints and problem areas to provide for Improved compliance. • 3) Improve public awareness of zoning codes and or- dinances. 4) Improve staff's response to complaints. LQUICATIgh AND TRAINING Every municipality within the State of Minnesota over a certain population is required by state statutes to adopt the State Building Code in it entirety and appoint a qualified Building Of- ficial who is tested and certified by the Department of Ad- ministration Building Codes and Standards Division. Each Building Official must satisfactorily complete applicable educational programs established or approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and industry. Continuing Education is imperative to maintain certification and to stay abreast of the every Chang i ng codes and new methods of construction. Listed below is a recap of the education and training i have received from the time of my employment at the City of Mound, 7/90 through 12/90: International Conference of bui ding Officials (ICBO), An- - nual Conference: September 1990. Lake Country Chapter of iCBO: monthly meetings State of Minnesota Building Codes and Standards Fall Build- ing Code Seminar: November 8, 1590. - 9 - 17/ ICBO Instruction Course - Advanced Plan Review: November 16, 1990. I am continuing work or my Associates Degree in Building In- spection Technology at North Hennepin Community College in the evening. It is the intent of this Department to continue education and maintain certification and also to explore the educational oppor- tunities available to Peggy James that are pertinent to her posi- tion and goals within this Department. SUMMARY My term as Building Official has just begun. I am learning about the goals and aspirations for the future of Mound. 1 am learning of the existing conditions and the history behind them. This community has Involved citizens and excellent management and staffing. It is rich in amenities and diverse in population. it holds a great challenge for the Planning and Inspections Depart- ment. There is a need for our department to become more computerized which will reduce the amount of manual work and increase ef- ficiency. In order to more adequately serve the public in processing permit requests and questions about what one can do with a certain property, inputting information on each and every parcel, including zoning requirements, zoning restrictions, zoning history, permit history, complaint history, flood zone cl and gene$ comments would be b e n e f i c i a l to the City. In addition, this would allow us to create accurate analysis pertaining to the number of complaints of derelict automobiles, the number of corner lots in the city and where they are located, it could provide a listing of all the commercially zoned properties in mound and their addresses, and much more. This staff is willing to take the direction of management and capable to take the lead where it is necessary. • 477 10 9Ch •.)ja 'RuTpjTnq 'uoTiTTomap SuTpeas saauej 'susTs suzpnlDUT 'panssT s3Tmaad BuTpTTnq jje sapnTOUT 3unoa sT41 :34"ON 6 29E 9906 VOLE 0661 El SLE EOL8 8ZE8 6861 El ZOV LZ£8 SZ6L 8861 Z 6ZV VZ6L E617L L861 I 89E Z617L VEIL 9861 8I£ EEiL 9189 5861 EZE 17189 I61F9 V861 LOE 061F9 E8i9 E861 96Z Z9I9 9885 Z861 98Z 9885 0095 1861 VSZ &'SS SUES 0861 OEE V, 19 IFI05 6L61 LVE EIOS 999V 8L61 SOV S99V 09ZV LL61 ZSE 6SZV L06E 9L61 9ZE 906E 089E SL61 IZE 6LSE SSZE VL61 S8Z LSZE ZL6Z EL61 ILE IL6Z 0092 ZL61 SZE 66SZ ILZZ IL61 LLZ OLZZ E661 OL61 IZZ Z661 ILLI 6961 LZI OLLI EV91 8961 03010/1 # lV101 -1 wc dV A llWa d .LNnw 11ROM Minima ivnNRY • • Mulm EXHIBIT 5 Total Yearly Values of New Construction 0 0 PI) Cn 10 9 to to 8 in WO C4 O 7 in ko - - - - - - - V in 0 k kn in v pq 7 CO CO 4 C14 Go Go r4 C4 3 - — — — — — — — — -- 00 - -7 - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - 2 - _ - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 -A - - - - - - - - 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 Year and Yearly Value in Thousands ($) • • • 474 EXHIBIT C New Housing Units (1974 - 1990) • Year • ti8o 120 100 03i 80 cn In 0 a: 00 3: 60 % z C4 40 % 20 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 �; 8:i 90 Year • ti8o For February 26, 1991 Council Meeting • February 21, 1991 LICENSE RENEWALS -- Expiring 2- 28 -91. New License Period 3 -1 -91 to 2- 28 -92. Approval contingent upon qualifying in all respects re- garding: All required forms, insurance etc. being turned in. Garbage Disposal Blackowiak b Son Randy's Sanitation Westonka Sanitation Woodlake Sanitary Cigarette Al b Alma's Supper. Club American Legion 0398 ( Tonka Vending) Ben Franklin Bob's Bait Brickley's Market Jubilee Foods Meyer's Mound Service Station Mound Municipal Liquor (Joe's Vending) PDQ Food Store #0292 SuperAmerica 04194 Thrifty White Drug 0704 VFW 05113 (Joe's Vending) Northwest Tonka Lions Club requests the following permits for June 22 and 23, 1991 Mound City Days. Please waive the fee on two of them as indicated. Approval contingent upon all required forms, insurance, police officer in attendance, etc being taken care of. Charitable Organi 3.2 Beer Permit Public Dance /Street Dan Permit - -- PLEASE WAIVE THE FEE Set -Up Permit - -- PLEASE WAIVE THE FEE 0 yg; BILLS - - - - -- FEBRUARY 26, 1991 • BATCH 1021 158,331.41 BATCH 1022 64,914.16 223,251.63 • 413 po I ►IIACNA6E JOURNAL M " CITY OF ion PREPAID 1,668.65 LEG 0 %130 MINE �• DATE! X9/91 TINE U.0.17 P9E -PAID ow ACCDINT M ER MW DW 8 DATE 64-6000-3100 1010 400.00 313% 2115/91 71-7100 -9510 1010 987.89 31360 2/05/91 71- 7100 -9510 1010 836.81 31385 2/12/91 71- 7100 -9510 1010 986.94 31397 2/19/91 01.2040-0000 1010 3865.00 31376 2p7/ ►1 gN81at I NOICE Od HOLD - MO NO. INVOICE NllEt DATE DATE STATI S NOW DESCRIPTIDII 10615 PIE -PAll 400.00 APPRAISAL -WI On 2/19M 2119/91 400.00 J NL-CD 1010 IM APPRAISALS VENOM TOTAL 400.00 60649 PRE -PAID 967.89 LID 01-4280 -1510 2/19/91 2/19/91 987.89 AL-0 71- 7100-1510 PIE-MID 836.81 LID 2/01/91 2119/91 2/19/71 836.81 jK_O PIE -PAID 986.94 LID 2/19/91 2/19/!1 966.94 J6L•O SELLDDT OEFOINrim VEMMOR TOTAL 2611.64 OM ME-PAD 3,665.00 Ol DNIM 2/2 PR 2/19M 2/19/!1 3,865.00 AL-O CITY MWl WMT UNION MOM TOTAL 3865.00 4001 NE-M 2,472.23 SIT 2/2 PA 2/1991 ?/19/91 2,472.23 JANL -C1 Fw4w 0.04 JA111ALES TAX S W.22 JAN Res tAX 2/l9R1 5 AL-0 CM8190 OF WAU WOOD UK 7729.6 C1145 WWI 710.06 AI► -COMB DOOR 2/19/91 2111191 710.00 J11L -0 1 "MM OOM IA1ES 0811MAL 710.0 11233 PRE-Mill 1,739.00 FEB DENTAL 16.00 FEB DENTAL-IETIRM 45.90 F13 DE1TAl -AEtVM 45.90 FEB DETTAI- RETIREES 63.90 FEB DENTAL-11TIAEES 2/19/91 2/19/91 1,712.70 JRNL-O ILIA DENTAL VENDIXI TOTAL 1712.70 E1429 PRE -PAID 578.00 LID 2`5.20 MINE 11.56- DISC 2/19/91 2/19/91 821.64 JK -O PREPAID 570.94 LID 94.60 MINE 11.41- DISC 2/19/91 2/19/91 654.13 JK-0 PREPAID 1,668.65 LEG 0 %130 MINE �• DATE! X9/91 TINE U.0.17 P9E -PAID ow ACCDINT M ER MW DW 8 DATE 64-6000-3100 1010 400.00 313% 2115/91 71-7100 -9510 1010 987.89 31360 2/05/91 71- 7100 -9510 1010 836.81 31385 2/12/91 71- 7100 -9510 1010 986.94 31397 2/19/91 01.2040-0000 1010 3865.00 31376 2p7/ ►1 71-7100-9510 71-7100-9520 71-7100-956 1010 821.64 31363 2/04/91 71- 7100-9510 71- 7100 -9520 71-7100-9560 1010 654.13 31388 2/12/91 71- 7100-9510 /.oa / 71 -7100 -9520 313 S-y_ 3 i Ye Y 184 r 01.204o•a000 - MO M.23 313N IN , 20 22. 2040.0800 1010 710.00 31392 2/19191 ot- 204o-aoD0 01- 41WISIO 01-4280 -1510 01-41441.1510 71- 7100-1510 1010 1712.70 31383 2/01/91 71-7100-9510 71-7100-9520 71-7100-956 1010 821.64 31363 2/04/91 71- 7100-9510 71- 7100 -9520 71-7100-9560 1010 654.13 31388 2/12/91 71- 7100-9510 /.oa / 71 -7100 -9520 313 S-y_ 3 i Ye Y 184 r PRE 2 PYRCMADE JOURNAL N CITY OF Ilm a to= MICE ME "" MO. DMILE W DAZE DATE STATUE NGXr MIPTIOM 33.37- DIM 2/19191 2/19/91 1,731.51 AL-0 ED PHILLIPS i 814418 VERB TOTAL 3207.33 71- 7100 -9621 01983 PIE -PAID 1,025.00 OF CORD 2/2 PR 2/19/91 2/19/91 1,025.00 AL-M GREAT ZEST LIFE A HAW %9= TOTAL 1015.00 '^ .. wo 01971 PREPAID 21.11 HNIP 2/2 PR 2/19/91 2/19/91 24.11 JIIL_CD WOJP HEALTH PLAN WNW TOTAL 24.11 r HO-M 01972 PIE -PAID 17'2.35 LIt 17.45-013C 6.39 FRI V19M 2/19/!1 160.3 JAIL -0 PIE -M 0D3.13 MBE 71-7100-9520 1.03- us 12.3 PIT 2/19M 2/19 iWX JBIL-CD 1010 1645.32 RE-M r, 'x 142.2 L9 412.36 NK x,91- N!C IL72 FRT 2!19/91 2/19/91 %1. 51 JILL -o PAHAU 1,693.65 LI0 16.10 MIME 21.13- SM 14.70 FRI 2/19/91 2/19/91 1,646.32 J K-M ORIOAS COOPER i COIPMT VENDOR TOTAL 3874.49 441999 PIE -PAID 681.44 LIGHTS 2/19/91 2/19/91 881.44 J111-LD M i H IWATRIEI, INC VEW TOTAL 881.44 M2145 PRE -PAID 288.46 2/2 PR DEB 1/19/91 2/19/91 288.46 JK-CD HEHN M 11PPORT i CIXLFCh YEW TOTAL 288.46 12301 PRE -PAID 340.44 1001 2/2 OR 2119191 2/19,'91 540.44 At-CD I01A RETIRFIENT TRUST -457 YEW TOTAL 540.44 12304 PREPAID 143.87 IDIA 2/2 PR 2/19/91 2/19/91 103.87 JK -CD ybS SIM Z/19/M TILE 16.41 PRE -PAID Dan At;C0w glJlw WW 0E0f 1 DATE 71. 7100 -9560 1010 1731.58 31400 2/19/91 01- 2040 -0000 1010 1025.00 31374 2/07/91 01- 2010-0000 1010 24.11 31379 2/07/91 n- 7144 -910 n•nao-9664 71- 7144 -9aao 1010 060.29 31361 2006/91 71- 7100 -9621 4 n- 71x4 -9664 n - I1ao -91x1 '^ .. wo IDV.37 31x11. 2/nt/ri r HO-M 71 - nao -9660 1010 5it.61 3134 2/12/91 71-7100-9810 71-7100-9520 /9•/944 -9�io - 71- 7100 -M 1010 1645.32 31398 2/19 /91 22-4170-3830 1010 881.44 31357 2/03/91 01-2040-0000 1010 288.46 31371 2/07/91 01-2040-0000 1010 544.44 31372 1/07/91 C7 • 01-2040-0000 1010 103.:1 31373 2107/91 is am mm- FAR 3 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE Y /19/91 0 CITT w IQliO T 1 PC 1 6.08.17 VE1Sdt 1MAICE ME 14D por NO. INUOICE WN DATE DATE STATUS MOLAR DESCRIPTION AL':01 4MY 'Alb ")f r )" t 'Wi ICM RET11 ENI MV -401 MDOR TOTAL 1001.87 12390 PIE -PAID 500.00 ISFSI MW-PED,GARV 2/19/91 2/19/91 300.00 ,Rl-CD 1914141IC WEGISINAR Vow TOTAL 500.00 M71 PRE -MAID 117.95 17.5 CIINTRACT 1Q1tS 01-43^ 31.0 2/19/91 2/19/91 417.95 JK -CD 10!0 PRE -PAID 94.36 l/ C1I(TFIACT NOUNS 01 - 3100 2/19/91 2/19191 94.36 JK-0 101P JIHI Tan em TOTAL 212.3t izo PRE -M 1,216.39 LID 117100 -9510 45.80 NINE 71- 1100-9520 21.79 DISC 71- 7100-9560 6/19/91 2/19/91 1,237.10 JK-CV 1010 1.'.0',40 31.361 1 PRE-MII! 1,616.74 LID 71 -7100 -9510 1,614.06 MITE 71-7100-9520 11.51- m iC 71- 71009560 1/19191 iJ19/9/ 3,181.29 JK-0 1010 3184,79 31367 7112/91 1IE-PAII 9111.00 LA 71- 7300-9510 179.35 21.01- NINE DISC 71- 7300-9520 71-7300 -9560 1119/" 2/19/91 1,119.54 JK-0 1010 313Y9 2/19791 JOIMJQi 1111 110E8U Ll* VE31O1 TOTAL 5311.23 L2781 1RE-000 310.91 JAN 8A OLINE 22-1170.2210 2/19/" 2/19/91 310.91 JML-CD � LAMTT'8 8701116 FORK m WIDO 1 TWAL 910.91 33817 PIE -PAID 44.00 UNION 212 PR 01 _?04 - x60 2/19/91 2/19/91 44.00 AL-CD UMW 01FORCO WT LAIM SER# VENDOR TOTAL 44.00 NMI PIE -PAID tt,t64.74 FIT 2/2 PR 01 2wj- (0 1 , 1/19/91 2/19/91 11,164.74 JNK -CD 101'% s ORQ ETTE SAW - KW VOW TOTAL 11164.74 !13090 PRE_*AID 107.16 HOSP 212 PR K 01 Y,4( WK 2/19/91 2/19/91 107.16 ,FK-CD !ED CNMEF WAIN PLAN VEDA TOTAL 107.16 M3170 PRE -PAID 643.54 JAN SAC 2.1A -X.r 2/19/91 2/19/91 643.50 Jdl -CD . am mm- 487 lk�.e PATE 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL SATE gal" AP-002.O1 CITY OF MIX ME 1A.01.17 1iJw UNOILE DUE Nu PqE -PAID OEM NO. INVOICE WN DATE BITE STATUS APCUM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT WHER mw CHEM 1 DATE METRO 11ISTE COMM CO111II VOW TOTAL 643.50 mm PRE -PAID 88.95 VIA COf 01-4040-4110 :::. JO P1Q14 COF 01-1190 0000 2/19/91 2/19/91 116.95 jak -co 1010 116.95 31366 2/01191 w CITY Off AS511 YEW TOTAL 116.95 K1;150 PRE -PAID 16.00 REGISTR-fPSA KM 01-4310.4120 2/19191 2/19/91 16.00 jK_C1 1010 16.00 31391 2/12/!1 ON PAW SUPERVISORS ASSN VOW TOTAL 16.00 !1.1401 PRE-PAID 338.00 OFF COP 2/2 PR 01- 2040 -0000 2/19/91.2/19/91 328.00 JK-C1 1010 328.00 313)5 2/01/91 ON "RE7E)iT SYS" VFWOR TOTAL 328.00 !OPUS PREPAID 40.65 UNION 2/2 PR 01- 20100000 2/19/91 2/19/91 643.65 JK_Cl 1010 M&M sm 2MI91 m TEAPISMAS wt 310 W= TOTAL 65.63 meao PREiAtB _ YY a.; yy ir �� r w�TQ1 Y ON- �ova�ato ► '{y {? ,�� lr.a h- �o�am� "s. woo L41 MA 1ElE1T 22t.I 9.75 mmwm P TAE METER 71- 71003210 20.40 REPm PREM RETER 01.41103210 4.00 REPLDI PDBTADE RETER 11-4330-3218 70.33 Fain PONTAE METER 01-4190-3210 25.a REPLEII PQTAE 15181 71. 73* -321e 25.0 A" POSTADI: 1E1ER 18-7100 -3210 ' 26M AO 31 POSTAE METER 01- 41403210 2.20 REPLDI POSTAE PETER 01-42803210 3.20 AEPLEN POSTAGE METER 70-.4270-3210 4.30 AUU31 POSTAGE PETER SECT 8 01-4090 -3210 6.30 REPI.DI POST Alf PE TER SEGO 01-1190 -0000 179.10 REPLEN POSTAGE PETER 01- 4320-3210 2/14191 7/19/91 500.00 ift-CD 1010 500.00 31395 2101/91 MOUND POSTMASTER WIQ1(ft TOTAL 500,00 P3950 PRE -PAID 6,860.99 PERA 2R PR 01-2W0 -OWO 2/19191 2/19/91 6,860.99 ,RP( -CD 1010 6860.99 31370 2107/91 P E R A VEW TOTAL 6860,99 P3952 0 ;AID o.00 CiVW PITG -P/C 01 1 x'.00 CHP/TBER KTG-P/C 01-4140.4:24 53.31 REPLEJN PIC 01 4;41., -?2'k 2/19/91 2119r 71. JX-CD 1410 71.31 313% 2/0501 PREPAID 23.16 Pf E?1 P/C-L 1Q 71.1! -2Yfj 487 '� CITY COUNCIL PACKET- 2 -26 -91 #2 � PAGE 7 PURCHASE JOURNAL W-0O2 -01 CITY OF MONO wmOR IWICE DUE HOLD NO. W! r y N" DATE DATE STATUS NOW DESCR:PTION 901ELIIE PLAZA VCVOR TOTAL 2300.66 54399 320.34 BLANK SIGNS 2/''?/91 2/22/91 320.34 JTOL -C1 SIGNS Af0 K AN(S , INC. YENDf)t TOTAL S4430 2!22/91 2/22/91 SOS PRINTING VEWOR TOTAL 54390 2/22/91 2/2Z/91 STEYENS !Ell COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 54600 2/22/91 2/22/91 liTPEIOgt'S VEW TOTAL 74716 TIRPOiARIS TO ® ` ` ' VDLQt 10TIL T4831 " 2112/91 222/91 TOIL CO m YB4 0t TOTAL T4940 ��//��/�p�� 2/22/91 3/f2M . TRI -STATE PUMP i C04TROL 1 VEIM TOTAL T4958 2/22/41 1122/91 THIN CITY BOLT INC VE?QIRk TOTAL LW50 2/22/91 2/22!91 LINIFU44S LK 1 M I TED VfTM TOTAL V5190 2122191 2/22;9, VMIOOREN HA'APD- STALLING$ VENIXR TOT4 IFA 30 • DATE 2m/91 TILE 10.36.39 PREPAID 1'j EM ACCOUNT NIVER AMOUNT DM ! DATE 01 -4'M -2360 1010 320.34 16.95 VAX S W 01-- 43.X` -LrJO 16.55 JAIL-CO 1010 16.55 1,746.00 RILL PUMP -HELL 6 73- 7300-3800 1,746.00 JRIL -CD 1010 1746.00 185.00 PISTOL LOC10R 01- 4140 -22I0 = 54.45 FLEE 01- 4140 -2I70 249.45 JRII -CJ] 219.45 F i r _, 53.25 IM HELP - ` + o-• "f : < + l 35.25 JIK-[a iL . 35.25 199.27 WE DIKi DRILL, U 199.27 r4 - f 83.50 HE ATER STRIPS 10 -23►i1 �..l� JII R _ ,.. 126.40 KITS It BOLTS 01- 4290 -2300 17.06 CONECTX 01-4240-2230 143.46 J NL-0 1010 133.46 399.00 PATCHES 01- 2300 - 2M 389.00 M -CD 1010 389.00 4,3 .45 CUBG [xR(T111 EaX DEWL 1b-58E7 3100 4'5i-.00 JAN PLAN ALT 01 4190 - 3100 4,808.45 JX-CL 1010 49%.45 3V-1 Fk:14m 73- 7340 -2340 414 f "OF 1 PURCNASE JOURNAL t" •'i W-02 -M CITY OF IQ10 �. VE MR INVOICE DUE HID PRE -PAID CNEX NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS M I DESCRIPTION ACMKT NUER NUNT CIM D DATE TOTAL ALL VE)CM 158,337.47 is t j, • M� ;, a] " i ll k� �. PUR "ABE JOURNAL Li` 1�� CITY . 1Q� ^„ ,.t AYE. Amm �r w y� ` s �' -` :111E 10.30,3f '- DAMICE IRE H U i��+ : PRE -PAID OEEZ NO. INVOICE MW DATE DATE STATUS MUUKT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT MJW NUM CIM U DATE 90050 910.00 '90 AMIT COSTS 01- 4090-3130 370.00 '90 AUDIT COSTS 11- 7100-3130 340.00 '90 AUDIT COSTS 73 -7300 -3130 340.00 '90 AUDIT COSTS 78- 7800 -3130 2/21/91 2/22/91 1,960.00 Jiw-m 1010 ABDO ABDO I EIC( YEWOR TOTAL 1960.00 X0060 7.74 CALC ILK RaI R 96-9600-4100 2.12 INK 01- 4090-2100 2/21/9' 2/22/91 9 jx-L7) 1010 A00- 14N/MIMUT BUSINESS t YOM TOTAL 9.66 AD431 16.66 CLEAN MET 01 -4190 -4200 16.67 CLEAN CARPET 73-7300-4200 16.67 CLEAN CART'ET 78- 7800-4200 zmm , Zra 91 50.00 JANL -U 1010 s ATHook CARPET f1.EAr1Il6 Vw TOTAL 50.00 31D.00 1111 PAIN M LEASE 01 4280 X0.00 Mltfi PARKINu LEASE 73-7100 - 4200.' t y 90 -00 PIEI(IN6 l ]�- 79DQ -i r, /f�� 4 �+ T+ @ j Icy '.�,3��" 'tnE �t � c ' • - 4 +�y ��//rf:" �t f � �.y �} j � r NN CONEIYfl 1 �10�00 s '' f:R#A AR DOG FTxD - 010 -000Q ' "�- •: 32.60 Doe FOOD oI , #0-2200 2/22/!1 2/!1191 166.66 JAIL - 101tl IEN M1 IQ.IN STOE MAL 166.66 106)7 +. • . •..�M.. "'549.93 JUN RECYCLE -CMPU CIAL 70-4270-W 2MM 2/11191 549.33 AL-0 1010 BFI RECYCLING STSTFMS OF N VENDOR TOTAL 549.33 80680 6.50 SDM ET ?-ROT 01-4140-4110 2/22/91 2/22MI 6.50 JUIL -CD 1010 BMW ROT VUW TOTAL 6.50 80707 79.13 GASO.1IE 22-4170 -2210 2/22/91 2!22191 79.13 JK-CD BR XV,S' FOODS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 79.:3 b074b 590.00 UN CMWCT,wP R rKL 0!-4.40 �v 2!22!91 2/22/91 590.00 JX-CD 10,0 0 4 U OF CRIMINAL APPFD+# WW TOTAL 590.10 6C' S 994.7) IBM *fE- WPITFr Frl 207.99 3 TR MAINT - Hr MEl'IF - - Fft b0 4iX'r ri PIIR VENDf1I1 ` +. UNICE sit HXb NO. INVOICE WER DATE DATE STATLE NUW WSCRIPTIDN ACCOw MISER ALUM GUY t DATE ` 2/22191 2122/91 1,191.99 JK-M 1010 MIdESS MMIlES SALES 0 VENDOR TOTAL 1191.99 C0630 152.00 SEVICE CASH REGISTER 71-7100-3820 2122,/91 2122/91 152.00 J OL-M 1010 CASH ;CGISTER SALES VENDOR TOTAL f 152.00 C063S 155.20 J U HATTER 78- 7800•"2200 2/71/91 2122/91 155.20 J W-M 1010 CEI VENDOR TOTAL 195.20 :1 00836 8P.08 TIM CARTRIDGES 01-4140-2100• 80.09 TOD CARTRIDGES 01- J040-2100 2!22/91 2/22/91 160.16 J I L-CR 1010 . CEDAR CQPJTER CETIIFR 'VE10QR TOTAL 160.. E G020 %, i 84.13 I . r 01 2100 x, f Z x Gt � r ^y . =M V rl ��7 •"A' T.$ t+ 'sue �� F y y � tt. J'.qt` 'r3. �' :�,� 'F l/Y' z �� :e :i � :•. -'k- t J "��l F -� -�' � .w 110. �4 'Sz /v fir' • is 5 � 4. • ' 4 4 r - -!1190- _ r , <�a.,•'� . 1-409'S'3= .. 11.12 IHfIDE 01- 4090- R' 322:30 .,1 tiz ' - , � . ' ._., r � _e"r. t ^ .. '�t :y�Gi4Tf�i .r� T « �� •7p ,r. ... y . . _ .. .r. .10.4) T ELDI M 164.00 TELEMM 71'7100-3220 70.49 TELEPHONE 22- 4170-3220 67.70 TRB'f E CUPLrTER 22- 4170 -3220 2/22/91 2122/91 2,313.85 JRNL-CD 1010 CoNrl EHIAL IE1.MM VENDOR TOTAL 2318.95 01131 50.00 CIEAN C.4M 71-7100 -4 1^ 2/72/91 2/72/91 50.00 Yx -CD 1010 MTOM INTERIOR CARE VEld7(1R TOTAL 50.00 013?2 145.11 P,LfJl•IDIE 73 -7 12 .[Es1 21 191 2 122/' +1 145.1 l fnl -CIi Ft INIIk "RTES, 110. 1�'Q(f' , ^rte R' �, 19.4 .,,P!( CD • 411 PASS 3 . MLA P U R C AA � �e � t l t IF UDOOt IMYOiCE 8tE ' kl e p ` NO. INVOICE NO DATE DATE 6TATU6 MM M9CRIPT10N A1mw NUtg;R N aw Ctm f DATE DRIVERS LICDt5E GUIDE CUM 7EI M TOTM 19.45 01350 25.00 flit BTAM 78 - 79DO - 4200 2/2491 2/22/91 25.00 JK-CD 1010 f . DUCK'S 66 SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL. 25.00 E1423 117.50 FLAGS 014140-2240 2/22/91 2/22/41 117.50 ,Fitt -{31 1010 _ EMTERI ` ELF1t WS COW VBM TOTAL 117.50 q e � F1560 v 209.20 FIAT E:TINGUISifRS b0-6(00 2200 - 282/91 2122/91 209.20 JOL-0 1010 FIRE CONTROL EXTIlNIS10 VDM TOTAL M.20 F1660 106.00 FFEe -APR SEC RIT7 -CITY tYAl p1 3100 # Y ¢ 6 1 0 A/P-MALL I:lJt1TFC1TT vw u r *` 212ZM Zr 4M t 240.00 Jilts FtOTD SECURITY 1E1 TOTAL + d i p K T G + .1i1 FM 1EITI F1722 " 22.10 eItOEF►,PLAN�FR # � ' 2/12/41 282/91 22.40 Jitter " �. FRANI4IM tMfER11AT'L AI9TT7 W= TOTAL 22.10 , L. V 8717 - 187.30 PICTl1iZS r 2/22/91 187.50 JK-a 1010 D 4 9 P!iflt16TIM VENDOR TOTP& I V.S0 ; r 61800 292.46 KPAIR AiEL -#16 73- 7300.3810 2$.46 REPAIR AUEL -i:6 78- 7800 -3810 2/22/91 2122/91 564.92 JX -LD 1410 GAPY'S D1EW1, SERVICE YETtDJt TOTAL 534.92 Gi?05 40.00 M N 'AL SE?V 73- 7300-42T, 2,'22/91 2/72/91 40.00 JN— -!7 10'0 ?IE-(A -! , P(; VE?Q>Oft TOTAL 40.60 G1yt0 20S.CM` JLIV 1- c''WLn 0; 4140 -11:9 444.Of Efi!" :':'ELF. 1S`! 0; x 3?4 CO 1 ^1 "i • 41z � - . DRIIE DIRE IQY �' 3 .pAiA CHECK 10. IMVOICE Met DATE DATE STATUS AtRW IWIpT101 ACCM 1l>rM " AHCW C EU i DATE H1998 1,872.50 FLOW BIADE5 01-4280-2310 2122/91 2/22/91 1,872.50 JK-m 1010 H i L IESABI, INC. VENUR TOTAL 1872.50 M2120 90.82 POSTAL VERIF 01-4060 -3210 2/71/91 2/22/91 90.82 JK-CD 1010 HUN CO DEPT OF PADW Y T YOM TOTAL 90.82 H2130 10.00 MES -M" 22- 4170 -4130 2122/91 2/12/91 10.00 AL 1010 I HN CO FIRE CHILES AS% vBW TOTAL 10.04 ' 12313 99.00 P06T6 METER QW-3 MS 01-4320-3214 2/22/91 2/22/91. 99.00 JIL-® z - 3010 IN YOM TOTIRL it 12315 ,. ;5,394.85 DEW, W01-IEilt -° r 394.85 AL-0 k# 11�RIIIIB, M:/fin .�.,,' >. t� qq 123b 1'„h b y . '9- r13jp.''r a 11NI1W10. Im ours MLI VElw TMAL u 62 - ai�Sl 116.21 CLUKXS 01-4290-22 y ' 12.81 oxmm CAM 73- 73W2300 2/22/91 282/91 129.09 Jt UCD 3 KNt PRAM VEND TWOL ; 129.09 12713 5,477.40 A RECICI.E SERV 70- 4270 -420C ' 2/22/91 2/22/91 5,477.40 JW - CD 1010 MIT," SERVICES, TIC. WWOP TOTAL 5477.40 1_7148 24.25 RECEIVE ST 73 - 2100 2M/91 2/22/91 24.25 .R11 -CD 1010 L -J W1BWR STAID DWAHT VSW TOTAL 24.25 �2r2o 24.33 CHISEL BLADE O1 42£30 2?10 2122191 24.33 ,R4 _ -1_1 1010 Lx L41t FOK ? 'DP AWf TOTAL 24,3' =`'80 ia.'. >� CFA Qj"T 01 -4:: f 10 4'.r' ,f -CLl ;�1C Y�'a � r N %'J i c►f if T ; N' bR 41A lA ; - al. '. 4 . • 41,3 ' s PURCHASE JOURNAL 'W a CO2 -01 CITY OF HDIJND�`�Y ss. xiio.!R.19 YEM)w INVOICE 01 HU pm olox NO. INVOICE NPM DATE DATE STATUS AMDl1NT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT Kiln Ann DIEM I DATE /93040 170.00 WIRC I ENFTRS FAINT 01 - 4095 2/22/91 2/22!91 170.00 At 1010 MASYS CORPMATION VENDOR TOTAL 170.00 KM 32.00 JAN UG,-TAY FORF LOTS 01-4320 -3100 4i'.00 JAN ENW. -ALE] PK ESCROW 01 -23U0 -0905 + 271.65 JAN ENGR LOTS 30-6000 -31c. 5,014.00 JAN E)M -CITT HALL. " 30- 6000 -WW 2, 427.00 JAN EXF -FIRE STA AMTN 22-4170-3100 2,777.00 JAN ENM -LIFT STA IIPROV 78- 7800-5000 32.00 JAN EKR -STOlW SITE 60-6000 -3100 21.00 ,JAN ENOR -PTA ARIF11 MM 01-4280 -3100 20.50 .M 00-N RECEPTCL DUN 73-MO 20.50 JAN 904% RECEPTEL MM 78- 7800 -3100 256.00 JAN ENGR-&M,INSP 01 -4190 -3100 _ 32.00 JAN EllM-A B PK 01 -4190- 3100 . 169.79 JAN BM-PHOTO 1/2 SECT 01- 4190-3100 TM 96.00 JAN ENDI- STFUTS 01-4280-3100. 62.00 JAN BMWs DEFT T3 7300-31QQ� } y : ' 62.00 JAN AI K,. 78-1800-3100 � MP y _. 2,008.00 JAM OjU1 M 26-5790-3100 736.00 A EMM -TA9A 14,07P.44 JK-t8 r 29.94 FED PIER RI]R. 29.96 JAILS NINA c(l PTIQINO . i TOTAL 29.98 �+ .: 90.00 1E?N-" 01- 4140-4130' - -- , ZM191 2/22/91 90.00 AIL -CO 1010 M CML OF R W06 - VENIV TOTAL 90.00 83289 30.00 PATCHES 22-4170 -2200 2`2( PARTS FOR BREATHE APPAR 22- 4170-2270 2/22/91 2/22/91 320.80 Mt-CD 1010 NN MOT FIRE L SAFE" VENDOR TOTAL 320.30 !C3F10 45.00 ELEC BOY 71- 7100 -3EM 2/22/91 2/22791 45.00 JF.Y m 1010 »'KA RE'RIGiRA?ION VENDOR TOTAL 45,00 15.o0 TES' rfTUi 73 -7?{Y' 4,% 2/22 N1 2i22/�1 ;5.!x -Rtt- CD 1010 M.NI EcN INC VE..NDCR rO'AI 15.7n W . ak5 • 49y MrE 6 PURCNM _JOURNAL �. AP COQ -01 CITY OF MO m 10.x. j'/ ' VENOOR I MICE DUE HOLD . ,n PRE44 0- INWICF NO SATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESl3iIPTI01 ACCOUNT N1110 AM UK DECK i DATE MlMICI -PALS VLNDM FUTAL 5.00 9 M 151.97 6ATTERIES 22- 4170-2200 2;.2191 2/22/91 151.97 J;K-0 1010 N t E VF-W TOTAL 151.97 My 65.00 WTR SHM REDISR -DIEET - 73 - 7300 2!12/41 2/22/91 65.00 JK-M WSW VEND R TOTTAL 65.00 N37I0 6.00 jw HDUE 01- 4290-2200 19.49 ,JAN HRH 01-4290 -2250 51.63 ,1f111 HOF 01-4290-2300 7.08 JAN HUE 73-7300 -2200 88.16 JAN HOVE 78-7800-2200 3.94 JAN HM 78- 7800-2300 2!12/91 2/71191 176.50 JRIL-Q . 1010 WNW HAAPRE VENDCR TOTAL 176.50 040 190.00 som 8106 01-42'80-2340 2/2YM * 190.00 JRX -, 1 EVAN SIGC � 10748 [ Y t 01-4320-2200 2R2/9t ?f22/91 77.30 1010 NOiTTA COUNTRY RAM VEND TOTAL 79.50 ml 182.90 HOW 3 E7tTS 71 7100-1510 150.00 HM x43 R THARAISM 01-4140 -1510 '2MM 221.75 114 U M" ' JMKM '01-4140-1310 2/12M 953.75 JRIL ;, - 1010 PHTSICIMIS OF MN VElO(Bi 553.75 04035 1,189.56 FEB BLDG MAINT -CITY HALL 01-4320-4210 "-' POWER MU FLOORS-POL 01- 4320-421C 98.34 FEB BUM MAINT -PM 01 -42@!J-4200 98.33 FEB BL[C MAir, -PM 73- 7300 -4200 98.33 FEB BLDG IVINT -P11 78 -7900 -4200 2!22/91 2/22/91 1,538.56 JX-CD 1010 PIKE'S BUILDING MAINTENAK �'NDOR TOTAL 1538.56 P4109 803.60 '91 LAWN SPRATING 80 8n n- A 2!'2':/91 2/;2!91 303.60 JIM -CP ;alr PW LW-, ON T 4 LAkT ASSO VE"1[YR TOTAL 8M.60 S4 :. . h6 MAP DUC y 4 V5 414 PAGE 1 PURCHASE JOURNAL ;, r DATE 2/21/91 1p-00;' -o1 CITY OF IDIIO 12!£ I0.30.39 AN" IMMCE DUE HOD PRE-PAID ollix NO. I !(y M" DATE DATE STATUS NOWT DESi7t.PTIO1 ACCUNT 1llW MW CHECK ! DATE SHURELINE PIMA �Uw TOTAL 2300. k6 S4399 327.3+ BLP4 S 11W 01- r.80 -','W ., 51 2;7_%, 320.34 JOC IQI.3 SIGNS AND KAW INC. VENDOR TOTAL 320.34 54430 16.55 FAI S, aPWP 2/2 2/22/91 16.55 ,FIL-CD 1010 SOS PB;NTI* VENDOR TOTAL 16.55 54590 1,746.00 POIL RW -W -L 6 73- 7300-3800 2/22/91 2/22/91 1,746.00 .fa! -CD 1010 STBW WELL cowmT VENDOR TOTAL 1746.00 S" 183.00 PISTOL LODGER 01-41-*-2270 .S4.45 Flu 01 rT4p 217p 2/22/91 2122/91 249.45 J K -CD ipj@ PK I DER'S VENDOR TOTAL 249.45 T V22/" V2Zt9l 35.25 35.3 TEMP HELP JK-0 MWWRIES TO (1] YENLOR TUT& 55.25 T�f fr T4831 " 2/22/91 2/22/91 1".27 199.27 MID140 DRILL. Ulm JRK-0 t" r.�� TOLL ED~ YEWOR TBTIL 199.27 T4940 83.50 HEATER STRIPS 70- 1800 - 23Yv - 2/22/91 2/22191 03.50 ,RIL - C8 « -- , � �.w� = •_ jj•�� TRI -STATE Pll1P I COWYRQ I YEN D(R TOTAL 83.50 T49% 126.40 NUTS t BOLTS 01- 4290 -2300 17.06 CONEC13R; 01- 4290-2250 21' 2/22/91 143.46 J04- -M 1010 TWIN CITT BOLT INC VE ?6J(7t 'C-TAL 143.46 05050 33 PATDc 01 23X' 3220 2122191 2/22 384.00 CD 1010 LIIIFURM UN T TED VEK(jp TOTAL 3Ro.QC VS1?Q 4 ,,l CEC ; - LU'Xi :h 3i70 l`ii.x7 :Y1 r..W �+1' 01 t;r :iQO 2% ,N1 ?I .q , 4,90P.t` _Pt -CL 10;0 C ETA!' :i 414 PAM 6 PURCHASE JOURNAL r-YE 2/?2/91 AP-0O2-01 CITY OF OW f 10.56.39 VDVIR INVOICE OLE HOLD PREPAID CHECK NO. !"ICt We DATE DATE STATUS APCUNT DESD7IPTION AL N111fA:R NUKT C1EC1( i DATE 2,x2/91 222/9. 348.23 .04L -CD !010 MATER PROD-CTS CWMY V'WF, TOTAL 348.23 W%l 30.00 SALT 01 -4280 -2300 2/22/91 2/22/91 30.00 ,All -0 1010 MATER SPECIALISTS, ;NC VOW TOTAL 30.00 M5550 11.35 TUBE 73- 7304 -2300 2/22/91 2122/91 11.35 ,All -0 1011 MESTON(A F IIEST(IE VENEVR TOTAL 11.35 ml 53.75 REP -ACE W&B 73-73DO -4200 2r- 9 } 2'71191 53.75 .All-0 1010 1ESTUNKA IEDIANICAL C" YOM TOTAL 53.75 549.38 PLUAI i' 40-6000-42M 183.12 FLEMING 01 -4280 -4200 1,120.00 ClM1I6 , Eij0W 73- 73)0 -38W 400.00 FOREST LANE 73- 7300-3800 216.25 1M7i1- SO1EiD!E 73- x 3003800 t MUD Ou *m Farm 2,298.00 LXMI E �AQ6IlE T3- 3d04. t 745.00 VAKHM 73- 73003800_, t 1,157.00 t7tE11ATER- silrSOt 707300 3800 - . 501.00 1P- TTRiOlE 73- 73003800 20.01- CAMT 73- 7300 -38M 2m,")l 2!2'1/91 5,894.74 JK-0 1010 vim INC VEWM TUTU 0896.74 2,410.00 JMI PRr>5ECTTI 2/22/91 2x12/91 2,410.00 JW-0 1010 - MIST PEARSOUi fRSUI YEWS TIITAL 2410.00 115150 409•88 W LEASE 01- 4320 5000 226.57 5052 - AINT 01 -4320 -3804 2!2191 "L/91 636.4` J;X -CD 101: 1ERD1 LUPYp TiGM VF,W TOTAL 636.45 16147 16.56 19.AA KTG L.1O?i -9KYE 01-4040-4120 16.56 ;Y -CD 1G; RALPH itYfPElL VIMU TOTAI 16.56 T�.� Al vtNtLFC M,911.15 � 1 L_ 0 c • 0 417 Area Fire Service Fund 215500 14331 14331 201169 6.65% Liquor Fund 169760 1.2637 12.637 CITY OF MOUND 7.44% Hater Fund 36445„ 24045 24015 „ 0405 .9?_ BUC�GET REPORT newer Fund 913540 76865 762`'5 8;6655 P •.rm T ',RES E X P - 1 - �'1 L' ! 1 Recycling Fund 84150 786 786 83364 JANL'.I Y 1991 4180 8.33% 35 4145 0.84% JANUARY YTD PER CFNT BUDGET EXPENSE EXPENSE VARIANCE EXPENDED GENERAL : �TND Council 61300 12362 12362 48938 20.17% Cable T`: 1330 0 0 1380 0.00% City Manlger /C?erk 161530 10023 10023 151507 6.21% Elections 590 17 17 573 2.88% Assessing 44600 8 8 44592 0.02% Finance 171040 9524 9524 161516 5.57% Computer 30250 1670 1670 28580 5.52% Legal 76950 3100 310u 73850 4.03% Police 745910 55600 55600 690310 7.45% Civil Defense 2700 1C87 1087 1613 40.26% Planninq /Inspections 123230 5672 5672 117558 4.60% Streets 392670 22697 22697 369973 5.78% Shop 6 Stores 5984C 4841 4841 54999 8.09% City Prop�•Lty 89200 3879 3879 85321 4.35% Parks 152690 5305 5305 14 -7 385 3.47% Summer Recreation 11760 0 0 11760 0.00 Contingencies 40000 0 0 40000 0.00% Transferc. 107560 10638 10638 96922 9.89% ('ENvRAL FUND TOTAL 2273200 146423 146423 2126777 6.44% Area Fire Service Fund 215500 14331 14331 201169 6.65% Liquor Fund 169760 1.2637 12.637 157123 7.44% Hater Fund 36445„ 24045 24015 „ 0405 6.601 newer Fund 913540 76865 762`'5 8;6655 8.42% Recycling Fund 84150 786 786 83364 0.931 Cemetery Fund 4180 35 35 4145 0.84% a 416 ,0.j CITY OF MOUND 1991 BUDGET EVENU' k ^PORT JANI'AkY 1991 8.33% JANUARY YID PER CENT BUDGET REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCn RECEIVED CENERAL FUND Taxes 1298890 908 908 1297482 0.07% Intergove;.nmental 713280 0 0 713280 0.00% Business Licenses 5100 246 246 4854 4.82% Non - Business Licenses and Permits 67700 2748 2747 64953 4.06% Charges for Services 36200 481 481 35719 1,33% Court Fines 95000 0 0 95000 0.00% Charges to Other Depar%'ments 28950 1052 1052 27898 3.63% Other Revenua 28400 0 0 28400 0.00% TOTAL REVENUE 2273520 5435 5434 2268086 0.24% LIQUOR FUND 970000 62349 62349 907651 6.43% WATER FUND 360000 21571 21571 338429 5.99% SEWER FUND 600000 47401 47401 552599 7.90% DOCKS FUND 71000 7891 7891 63109 11.11% CEMETERY FUND 3000 0 0 3000 0.00% Y49 0- • • LAKE N1 INN F I O N KA "ONSE i, 'ION DlSTI T LAKE USE CONIi11'IT.P. • A G c N D A RC6 l FEB -� Mondav, Febivary - 19"1, 4 :30 [.m. Comcru: ity Room, Norwest Baran Builuir:g havzata 900 East Wayzata Bleu., Suite 135 (Elevator access for handicapped: use west entrance o! ) 1F r �.':il'::li.i Blvd) 1. Request from resident, Jim Ur',an, Crystal Bay, to add a Siow buov it the east end of Coffee Channel. 2. Resolution to establish fet_s for a public hearin), on a Liquor license application that is +dding a :mart of Cali, per Code 95.44, Sul—J. w. 3. Revised draft of MN DNR Bill for an Act relating to pers watercraft. 4. Resolution #59, Policy on Open Water Fishing Contest Permits, recommending deletion of the requireme::: teat a copy of the DNR permit is needed with the LMCD application, due to excessive delays • 5. Review fee for a preliminary investigation requirea with initial application for an on - sale wine license. 6. Amendments to Hennepin Ccuntt Sheriff's 'water Par_rol .r ;:,::1aI o.,eratir,g agreement. 7. Liquor licen - renewal application for Queen of Excelsior I,.,. John Larr.bin. 8. Special Events: a. Deposit refund for Laf;r -ette 2%3191 wir'. , ;t - SIM) b. Return deposi'` for can: '1 if d ki fl'. ir.; e%•t :t I r Ch;irlhc-r of Comnerce's Chili C, 9. Proposal to invite publ.. c•.._. ..,rnt. "r. }:'h`1 , et-d c i an insert in summer rules T rules. 10. Water Patrol report a. Fish House Co. nt b. Additional report 11. Other business recon: :r.t:dc-' . ( i, tt•t• 0 2 -15 -91 .s o0 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PARK E OPEN SPACE COMMISSION FEBRUARY 14, 1991 . Pres -it wEre: Chair Brian Aslescn, Commissioner Tom Casey, Ca thy Ba i ; •v, Nei I Weber , Shirley Andersen and Carolyn Schmidt, Park Direc Jim Fackler, Dock Inspector Tom McCaffrey, and Secretary Pe qy James. Commissioners Marilyn Byrnes anc' Lyndelle c koglund were abse.lt and excused. There were no citizens P. _sent. MINK - r ES MOT I UN rrk ^ by Ca , •y seconded by da I i ey to approve the Parks. s G n Epace Goan. :s.on .fimutes of January 10, 1991. Moti• carr'�d unanimously. N' TU CONE•ERVAT I O; AF - AS: a) C` e 1 i st repo - ro_m_ subc -_ m i ttee, b ) R i t -•.i 1 i st f c i t s,.ate or jed i es The Commission briefly reviaweci the drEfted ct which was handed cut pr i or -) the meet ` g. Fter d i _ L. uss i ng the forrrkit , it was determined tnat tre suLommittpe, consisting of Schmidt, Weber and Casey, will fir -tune tt e check l i :,t and submit it for- review a, the March Park LLel( „i ss i on meeting. Tt.e Park Director revie� A ti iist of pro,)erties supplied by the Secretary at being des i Or .3t( r7 Park ' -- inds with no names . The fo 1 - lowing comments were made on h.,e Nroper'ies: Rif -_# 3 On Carlow Road, this propc is low 20 _)n W i i sh i re betwrr_ , '_arci i gan and Denh i gt . t i s F)rnF)cr ty has a very steep sic, down towards - lake. 99 Edgewater R 4r ;or t_h i Fir )perty 3 al - 30 st, er? and has a srn._,i 1 grassy are,-i w,rich the P irks UE'ry -jrI fnr r1: r Si tains. 1 10 Lynwood d 1 v'. K M i 1 I Pon-:, this prop - r _ ; ;F'd for dr a i n ,3ne and cr,r,t j i ns , reeds and cat tiA i : 5. Guth of L y voo off (7- Bc�xwr. > (".h rh s r r)erty i s land; kd unt i 1 (. ; *r _ a lr.,r• lrlrf ri�,rttr �,f i�lrt il:tt i Itrt t0 %mil r rir 1 f t F t r1 3rc_e i tie City if t e !r�er1 t',Fr F:,ror „�riy. S O/ Parks & Ov,n Space Commission Minutes February 14, 1991 Page 2 150 On west side of Highland Blvd. abutting Cooks B.:3y, this property slopes towc3r,ls the lake and contain , c srr" l I gravel drive. There i3 a pumping station and a tunnel used to determine the lake elevation on the property. 178 On south side of Brunswick, west of Brighton Blvd, this property is high towards the road, it swales. 195 On west side of Dundee Larne and east of Ct ,rch this property is flat on the top and slopes downhill co Dundee. 221 This property is north c.f Wat ?rb ury abutting the lake. There are four comrrTOns docks here and a pumping sta -- tion. The shoreline w•as rIprapped about one year ago and posts were installed hiocking the access. It is not a winter access. Property slopes down to the lake. The Commission then determined they would divide the 33 "Vacar)t" tax forfeited parcels amongst them,eives so if they wished ob- serve these open spaces prior to the checklist: being completed, they may. The properties were divided as follows: Weber 1 - 4 Schmidt 5 - 9, 28 8 29 Bailey 10 - 16 Casey 17 - 20 Skog l unci 21 - 23 Asieson 24 - 27 Ahrens -- 33 Andersen and Byr nes we r c? n,,t <: , s i c3ned any ar (_-,.:3s at t: t� i * i me ENCROACHMENTS ON PUBIIC LANDS: Discussion t'arks Director, Jim F<_0 er, p:3', 'd C)t_st cr�p)ie Cif 5';` of ttif C(NTVTK)' - 15 whiCh We_rE' in tt!; mid to l„ +.� �� ,�,. T�hF•SE surveys show a] I enc.ro,_3chmerit s at I hcif t i mfg , i nc I tjr3 i nq bo , 3t houses, stairway:,, df 1: rf ningg waI1,, What ab -)ut encro s . - )nt r, �jrj u , i rrrc >roverl puk; I i r .z )r' way, SUCK as the end r:)f T trt�F? r'r� i nt; `s E; 1 yr to m,3kf. a platted - ItrF_� d L'�:l rr; _.;(1 C:'�.i �.. t ?E'y f•l !;, r , �. t,t f,, -,r end's F35 pt ()( f�f'(H Thfr rc�auirt5mt�nt t ..;r;! � ,,r� rni t o their ic n , r- r .. { �) try Parks 6 Oren Space Commission Minutes February 14, 1991 Page 3 • and can keep an eye on existing encroachments to ensure they do not expand. It was suggested that the dock application contain a statement reminding dock holders that structures are: not allowed on the commons without the approval of a maintenance permit. Encroachments onto other city properties was discussed. AsIeson commented that while we inventory the city owned properties with the check] ist, they could look for possible encroachments at that t i Pe . MOTION made by Casey, seconded by Bailey to recommend that the public be notified, through commons dock mail- ings or the City newsletter, of the basic requirements and restrictions of building Private strictures on, or alteration of public lands as written In City Code Sec- tion 320. Motion carried unarlmously. WINT VEHiCLE /SNOWW)BiLE LAKE ACCESSES: Snowmobii activity on C_i ty streets_ Parks Director, Jim Fackler, reported that the Police Department claims to have received only about 3 - 6 complaint: about snow - rx)biles this season. The Commission discussed at length the topic of snor:mobiling on Public streets. Wet ._ commented that he is aware of an In- dividual who plans to pur the banning of Snciam,obi ling on p u b l i c streets, and t,: i s per•. -on clans orl appear i ng at the February 26th City c oi.anc i I meeting to be hear:.,' or) the issue. WEOt?r commcnte ti s3fi need to be edUCr3tE'd about how to drive (:csr cfu_ 1 y on t �- and how n-,�t to abuse the wet; I :ands . MOI ION rrv- de tsy F3,a i 1 icy, secondef by Ca�,ey tcs recommend that a I i st. of r (,(? i ste(;_ , I 0 %- .1her's I n Mound be obtained arxi ne "'t yojv' '-;e?nd them ruit_s - w - id, req;,IatiGns fG snowmc >t 11i i fj f4(,) !rad, A he vex frig printed in the City nrw °:¢rtt °r ,i Motion carried untatnirm- .:arr.. The m-- - F• 12, 4 a .- the ir i r, Mound wa Parks a Open Space Commission Mir,utes November 14, 1991 Page 4 A PPROVAL OF THE 1 991 LMCD DO CK LICEN APPLICATIONS MOTION made by Bailey, seconded by Andersen to recommend approval of the 1991 LMCD Commercial Dt :k License for Boat Rentals of Minnetonka Inc. Motion carried unanim- ously. TOPICS TO DISCUSS AT JOINT MEETING ON FEBRUA 19,__1991. The Commission reviewed some topics which they propose to discuss at the Joint Meeting, as follr�ws: - SNOWMOBILING IN MOUND - NATURE CONSERVATION AREAS - LOST LAKE - DOG DROPPINGS IN THE PARKS - PARKS AND COMMONS IMPROVEMENT ;-LAN FOR ��91 - ADOPT A GREEN SPACE PROGRAM CO UNCIL REPRESENTATIVE'S REPOR -Ahrens commented that she is in favor of identifying the most commonly used snowmobile accesses. Casey commented that he would like snowmobiles banned frcx:i City streets and he is in favor of taking a poll of the cit tens on the issue. PARK, DIRECTOR'S REPORT Fackler updated the Commission on the improvements being msde to the Parks Department garage on the Island and status of the skat- ing rinks. Fackler also suggested to the Commissioners that if they want funds allocated for park improvements in 1992 they shou the improvements wanted. Andersen suggested that the City try to receive donations from the public for park improvements. D OCK INSPECTOR'S R EPORT Tom McCaffrey b r i e f l y reported that the Dock App l j(-.1t_ only beginning to be submitted f or the 1991 EA RTH DAY Tom Casey announced that the E,jrth Day Coruni ti, ee h,�> •;r:�.,,i;,�r� �, r_elebration for Earth Gay to r��k.Fr p1,3r on `��tr.� �t<rv, AG;r i l �'i_jth, There w i l l be Earth Day type gent at tl je [)e;)()t t r 3 p.m. Parks & Open Space Commission Minutes February 14, 1991 Page 5 MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Weber to adjourn the Park a Open Space Commission Meeting at 10:02 p.m. Mo- tion carried unanimously. �J lyQ 5- MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION February 11, 1991 Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer, Vice Chair Geoff Michael, Commissioners, Jerry Clapsaddle, Frank Welland, Michael Mueller, Bill Voss, and Mark Hanus, Council Representative Liz Jensen, Building Official Jon Sutherland, and Secretary Peggy James. Ab- sent and excused was Bill Thal. The following citizens were in attendance: Tom and Sandy Effertz and Arlene Stoltnow. Chair Meyer called the regular meeting to order at 7:32 p.m. MINUTES ThP January 23, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes were presented for changes and /or additions. MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Clapsaddle to ap- prove the January 28, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Case No. 91 -002: Tom Effertz, 4757 Island View Drive, Devon, Block 7, Lot 11, PID *30- 117 -23 22 0059. C ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: Oversized Accessory Building. PUBLIC HEARING. Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicants request for a Condit►)nal Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction of an oversized attached garage. Currently, the zoning code limits the size of accessory structures to not more than 10% of the lot area, or 840 square feet, this proposed garage exceeds both. The applicant's lot area is approximately 7,500 square feet which would allow a 750 square foot garage. The applicant Is proposing a 35' x 36' garage totaling 1,260 square B=eet. The proposed addition will meet all setback requirements. Staff recommended denial of the request for a CUP to build an oversized accessory structure based on the premise that the criteria for a CUP has not been met and that granting the CUP would not be in harmony with the zoning code. The applicant submitted a revised request for a 32' x 34' garage totaling 1,088 square feet. The Building Official reviewed three sites which the applicant previously commented had oversized garages in the area of his house. There are no building permit records on file for these garages, therefore the garage si, ?s cannot be verified, the es- .,Imated sizes are as follows: 0 Lot S ize Garage Size 3225 Devon Lane 12,800 1,056 sq ft 4711 Island View Drive 7,500 1,000 sq ft 4717 Island View Drive 7,500 900 sq ft S'O4 Planning Commission Minutes February i1, 1991 Page 2 The Commission discussed the request and Chair Meyer reviewed the CUP process. Chair Meyer opened the public hearing. Applicant, Tom Effertz, commented that he needs a full size garage because he has two full size cars and a pick -up truck with a plow and he would also like a work bench. He will meet all the setbacks and there will still be enough room for visitor parking. He would like to park all his vehicles and other equipment in- side. This addition will also be accompanied by a $80,000 to $90,000 renovation of the existing house which will raise the property value. He also stated that if he is not allowed to build a decent size garage, he will be forced to sell the property. The Commission discussed the fact that they are considering an amendment to this section of the zoning code. C The Building Official suggested that the garage size be limited to 1,000 square feet in order to be consistent with the Building Code. Mr. Effertz agreed to a 1,000 square foot maximum. MOTION made by Voss, seconded by Weiland to approve the Conditional Use permit for an oversized accessory build- ing of 1,000 square feet maximum. Approval is based on the findings that no variances are required, this type of construction is consistent with the neighborhood, and the structure will be improved. Motion carried unanim- ously. It was suggested that the use of the garage be limited to a residential use only. This case will be heard by the City Council on March 12, 1991. Mueller commented that the garage door set -up, limiting the num- ber of garage doors, should be considered when reviewing the zoning code amendments. Proposed Guidelines for the Interviewing and Selection of Can- didates for Planning Commission. - Chair Meyer reviewed the reasons for developing standard voting procedures for the Commission. The Guidelines for the Interview- ing and Selection of Candidates for Planning Commission as sub- mitted by the Secretary were reviewed. Minor changes were sug- gested by the Commission, the Secretary will revise the guidelines and bring them back for the Commission's review. S07 Planning Commission Minutes February 11, 1991 Page 3 Video taping the interviews was discussed at length. Clapsaddle, Meyer and Hanus were opposed to the taping because they feel it would inhibit the applicant. Jensen, Michael, Weiland and Voss were in favor of taping, and Mueller agreed that taping is ac- ceptable, but only if necessarily needed due to scheduling con- flicts. It was suggested that the legal consequences for taping an applicant could be checked by the City Attorney. The Commission considered that if the intent is to interview all the applicants on the same night, and the City Council members attend, as it is stated in Resolution #89 -139, there should be no reason to tape the interviews. Also, if the City Council is present, they should vote with the Planning Commission. A recom- mendation will then come from the Planning Commission as a result of tht_ vote. Jensen suggested that the concept of the Commissioners meeting together prior to the interviews to review questions for the ap- plicants be added to the guidelines. The Commission agreed. City Council RSpresentative Report Liz Jensen reviewed the City Council Meeting of January 22, 1991, and the agenda for the meeting of February 12, 1991. MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Voss to adjourn the meeting at 9:16 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Chair, Bill Meyer Attest: Sob ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - MINUTES - JANUARY 31, 1991 0 The meeting was called to order at 7 AM, in the conference room at City Hall. Members present: Paul Meisel, Jerry Pietrowski, Ken Smith, Mark Brewer, Ben Marks, Sharon McMenamy -Cook. Absent: Fred Guttormson and Jerry Longpre. Also present: Bruce Chamber- lain and Mark Koegler from VanDoren Hazard and Stallings, John Norman Finance Director and Ed Shukle City Manager. City Manager Ed Shukle made some introductory remarks as to the facilitator project. He then introduced Mark Koegler and Bruce Chamberlain of VanDoren Hazard & Stallings, who reviewed the draft organizational structure. After their review, discussion focused on persons who could be placed on the various committees within the project team. Names suggested for the design team were Jerry Clapsaddle, Gene Hostetler and Bob Morgan. Members suggested for promotions were Jerry Smith, Cathy Boese, Mary Harrell, Cindy at City Looks, Bill Holm of the Laker and John Larson of Larson Printing. Persons suggested for the business development committee were Dale Sherburne, Tim Kenealy, Peter Johnson, Ron Norstrem, Karen King, Judy Marshik, Ted Koenecke, Bob Gieb, Bob Tomalka and Susan Ruud (added by Ben Marks). The consensus was to have VanDoren Hazard & Stallings and city staff make contacts with these individuals to see if there is any Interest in serving on the project team. In addition, the committee members were going to come up with additional names for consideration at the next meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 8:45 AM. m full ubmitted, le City Manager ES:1 s 1 � 1 1 Soo ? • February 20, 1991 612 222 -8423 To Municipalities and Townships Elected Officials & Staff: The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) has scheduled breakfast meetings for elected officials and staff of the metropolitan area's municipalities /townships to discuss a draft of the updated MWCC Wastewater Treatment and Handling Implementation Plan (1990 -2010) and 1992 budget information. MWCC wants input from you prior to drafting its 1992 budget and finalizing the latest version of its Implementation Plan, which is updated every two years. Three meetings with a focus on municipal users of our system are scheduled in March at various locations around the metro area. If you are interested in attending, the meeting dates and locations are: March 7 (Thursday) 7:30 -9:30 a.m. U March 14 (Thursday) 7:30 -9:30 a.m. Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears P ark Centre, 230 East Fifth Str S t. Paul, Mi 55101 Northwest Inn (Brooklyn Park - 694 6 Hwy 81) Holiday Inn ( Bloomington - 494 & Hwy 100) March 19 (Tuesday) 7:30 -9:30 a.m. Drover's Inn (So. St. Paul - 494 & Concord) In late May /early June the MWCC will schedule additional meetings to present the 1992 MWCC draft budget. Comments from both the March and May meetings will be taken into consideration in drafting the budget. The budget is presently scheduled for a public hearing at the MWCC Board Meeting on June 18, 1991. The following month, on July 16, 1991, the Board of Commissioners is expected to approve the budget. Final cost allocation letters will be sent to municipal users in August. To place your reservation for one of these meetings, call the MWCC's Public and Community Relations Office at 229 -2129. Equal OpporlunitylAfh , matrve Action Employ"r "rjRs' 7" 470 RICO FEB 26i991 7- /9y/ t4 . _ �� —•-emu✓ ��,2. �v � ,t,�. � �.� -.x�:/ t�,.e �o� V � ` C _ v�� 1 \� � � � �� 3 `� �> �� ,r °� �� ' �� ,� �� LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS REr'" FE 1 2 5 ,Z 'it vu u iJ.�i AGENDA Regular Meeting, 7:30 PM, Wednesday, February 27, 1991 Tonka Bay City Hall 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19) 7:00 PM PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. The Harborage Variance for dock use area adjustment or for a setback variance 2. Bowers Variance to adjust dock use areas, setbacks and length 7:30 PM REGULAR MEETING: LMCD Board of Directors 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Reading of Minutes: 1/23/91 4. Public Comments - from persons in attendance not on agenda 5. Vice Chair Report, Foster A. "Save the Lake" annual recognition dinner February 21 B. Additional announcements 6. Committee Reports A. EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL TASK FORCE, Chair Reese 1) Approve bid on barging /trucking contract for weed control program 2) Approve proposed 1991 EWM harvesting budget with provision for shortened schedule depending on outcome of projected revenue 3) Approve recommendation for project manager position 4) Approve concept of lakeshore weed pickup for disposal on LMCD barge, subject to final agreement between participants - LMCD, barge contractor, and private operators 5) Approve endorsement, bill for act re: funding for exotic plants, organisms 6) Additional business recommended by the committee B. WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Grathwol 1) Approve minutes, meeting of 2/9/51 2) Approve Order for David Thomas Development, Bayshore TI Homeowners Association, Inc. 3) Approve Resolution for Residential Temporary Dock Extensions without . Permit, adding new paragraph 2 4) Approve 1991 Multiple Dock and District Mooring Area License renewal applications 5) Approve Declaration of 1991 as a low water year 6)•Approve $100 refu•.d to William Schritter for deposit on permanent dock application 7) Approve Subcommittee to study Wetlands on Lake Minnetonka, , LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Board Agenda 2/27/91 8) Approve new deicing permit for City of Greenwood. receipt of fees pending city council approval March 5 9) Additional business a) City of Greenwood appeal to DNR dredging permit extension for Channel Drive HOA, St. Albans Bay b) Update on legal action with Gayle's Marina regarding improper storage of watercraft c) Other business recommended by the Committee C. ADVISORY, Chair Rascop 1) Review progress on Metropolitan Council staff report to resolve the Met Council staff findings and recommendations of Met Council Systems Committee as adopted 1/22/91 2) Report on meetings and exchanges with LMCD cities rrgarding their dissenting resolution of 12/6/90 3) Review MN DNR response to property redevelopment as it relates to Shoreland Rules adoption 4) Approve Shoreland Grant Agreement as amended and distributed tc LMCD Cities and Board 12/27/90 including the addition of the Technical Review Committee recommended at the joint city /DNR /LMCD Shoreland Rules meeting of 12/10/90 5) Approve Resolution specifying the Procedure to be Fcllowad in Amending the LMCD Long Term Management Program 6) Additional business recommended by the committee D. LAKE USE COMMITTEE, Chair Pillsbury 1) Approve minutes, meeting of 2/25/91 2) Approve Resolution establishing fees for Adding a Port of Call to a liquor license renewal application per Section 5.44, Subd. 4 3) Review revised draft of MN DNR Bill for an Act regarding personal watercraft - informational or as recommended by committee 2/25/91 4) Approve amendment to Resolution 59, Policy on Open Water Fishing Contest permits 5) Approve amendment to Resolution 54, Establishing Liquor License Pees, adjusting fee for a preliminary investigation: for new, on -sale wine license applications 6) Approve Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol 1991 annual operating agreement 7) Approve Special Event License deposit refunds, $100 each: a) Lafayette Club Winter Event 2/3/91 b) Excelsior Chamber of Commerce - cancelled event 2/8/91 8) Water Patrol Report 9) Additional business recommended by the Committee E. FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Boswinkel 1) Statement of Cash Transactions, month ending 1/31/91 2) Audit of Vouchers for Payment P. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, Strommen 1) Administrative progress 7. Unfinished Business Be New Business 9. Adjournment IECT FEB 20 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Board of Directors Regular Meeting, Wednesday, January 23, 1991 Tonka Bay City Hall 1. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order by Chair Cochran at 7:40 p..m. 2. Oath of Office. Charles LeFevere administered the oath of office to David Bartos (Victoria) and Scott Carlson (Minnetrista). Bartos and Carlson were seated as Board members and welcomed by the Board. 3. Roll Call Members Present: Bert Foster, Vice Chair, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; David Cochran, Chair, Greenwood; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Scott Carlson, Minnetrista; Thomas Reese, Mound; David Bartos, Victoria; Thomas Martinson, Wayzata. Also present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel, Sgt. Wm. Chandler, Eater Patrol; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician. Members Absent: Jan Boswinkel, Treasurar, Minnetonka Beach; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Douglas Babcock, Secretary, Spring Park; Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; Robert Slocum, Woodland; JoEllen Hurr, Orono. 4. Reading of Minutes: Grathwol moved, Martinson seconded, approval of the 12 -5 -90 minutes as submitted. Motion carries'., Carlson abstaining. 5_ Pubis:. Comments: There were no comments from persons in attendance not on the agenda. The Board approved Foster's request to amend the agenda by withdrawing item 7.B.4, City of Deephaven request to maintain power boats on buoys in the district mooring area, at the request of the Deephaven Dock Committee. Cochran further presented a letter of 1/23/91 from Duane Markus, Wayzata, stating his understanding that power boats are not allowed in District Mooring Areas, making reference to LMCD's Policy and Criteria of 4/1/87 for DMA permits. With the item being withdrawn from consideration, the concern is registered for future purposes. 6. Chair Report, Cochran Cochran reported that the City of Greenwood has voted to replace him on the Board at the end of his term. He stated he is saddened that he will not be able to help the Board beyond that point. He will. continue to devote time to the development of the Management Plan. Cochran noted the new appointee, Brian Burdick, was noted in Greenwood's Council minutes as to be appointed as of September 1. Cochran's term actually runs through the appointment of new directors at the October board meeting. Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, adoption of a Resolution Commending Cochran for his service as the LMCD Board chair for his extensive dedication to the Long Term Management Program and - -continued LMCD Board of Directors January 23. 1991 over - all public sarvice for Lake Minnetonka. Motion carried unanimously. Foster moved, Martinson seconded, to amend the Resolution to state "Unanimous" instead of "wholehearted" support. Motion carried unanimously. Pillsbury moved, Grathwol seconded, a motion requesting the City of Greenwood to rescind its action not allowing Dave Cochran to continue to serve LMCD. Cochran expressed his reservations about the motion. Reese agreed the need is to reach the middle ground with the cities. Foster noted many peopl- appreciate the work Cochran has done. Bartos concurred it would be better to let time work to settle this issue. Pillsbury withdrew his motion, Grathwol the second. 6.A. "Save the Lake" Annual Recognition Dinner. Cochran reported the Annual "Save the Lake" Recognition Dinner will be held 2 -21 at Lord Fletcher's. The dinner cost is $20.00, $3.00 of which is a donation to the Save the Lake Fund. Board member's dinners will be complimentary. A Water Patrol special deputy will be honored. The newly appointed Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, Rodney Sando, has been invited to speak. (He has subsequently accepted.) Two film clips illustrating winter lake ice hazards will be shown by the Water Patrol. The Board members are asked to urge attendance by a representative o their city. 6.B. February Meeting Dates The Board discussed changing meeting dates in February, but the consensi•j was to stay with the original schedule. 6.C. Employee Performance Review Cochran reported the officers and committee chairs are proceeding with employee performance reviews. Board members were invited to pats any performance observations along to an officer. 7. Committee Reports 7.A. ADVISORY, Chair Rascop 7.A.1) Presentation of Long Term Management Program to Metropolitan Council Systems Committee The Board received the Metropolitan Council staff report, findings acid recommendations to its Metropolitan Systems committee dated 1/15/91. A subsequent amendment to the Findings and Recommendations as adopted by the Metropolitan Systems Committee (MSC) at its :/22/91 meeting were also received. Cochran updated the board on two MSC meeti gs attended in January. The first on 1/8, included Arndorfer, Hurr, Strommen continued E LMCD Board of Directors January 29, 1891 and Cochran. Wayzata, Orono, Spring Park and greenwood representatives presented objections based upon the resolution drafted 12/6 and subsequently signed by eight cities. Woodland's Mayor spoke in support of the plan. Cochran's address to the MSC appeared to be favorably received based upon questions from the committee members. The second MSC meeting held 1/22 was attended by Cochran and Foster. Cochran re- stated the Board's position. The MSC requested a time extension of six months for its comment and review purpose. Cochran offered to present the request to the LMCD Board. A major item cited in the MSC staff report was the lack of memoranda of understandings to clarify and simplify the management structure for the lake. This was to be accomplished among the various agencies which share authority over lake related concerns so that "existing authority be exercised in a consistent and coordinated manner," according to the Metropolitan Council staff report. Cochran advised the MSC that LMCD intended to develop such memoranda once the Management Plan was approved. The second item in the amended Recommendation by the MSC changed "suspend" to Give Tentative approval of the plan . . which Cochran reported the Metropolitan Council attorney advised the MSC after its 1/22 meeting that it cannot give tentative approval. It must either approve or suspend the plain. Cochran interpreted the "tentative approval" , be the MSC's general agreement with the plan, but concerned that city differences be resolved. Cochran invited the Board's consideration of a motion to extend the Metropolitan Council's review period from the statutory sixty days which expires 2/4/91 to six months as requested in the recommendations. Martinson moved, Grathwol seconded, to authorize the. chair to approve a six months delay of the Metropolitan Council review period. DISCUSSION= Reese sees the positions of the cities as widely divergent with no middle ground. Cochran noted that some cities objections are contrary to the directives the Metropolitan Council gave LMCD. Met Council's offer of a staff assistant should help the cities realize the obligations LMCD has to the Metropolitan Council directives. Grathwol recommended the MSC report receive broad distribution, to the cities, newspapers and interested persons or organizations. He expressed disappointment that after two years of hard study, the Met Council has not backed up the LMCD. Grathwol reconsidered his second for a six month extension to the Met Council recommending sixty days instead,. Martinson proposed that the board allow up to six months extension to the Met. Council comment period. Foster sees the purpose of the time extension to get most or all of the cities on board with the Management Plan. LeFevere reviewed the Met Council's authority in this regard to be: - continued LMCD Board of Directors January 23, 1991 1) Suspend implementation of the plan because they don't npprove it; 2) Approve the plan; 3) Let the sixty days lapse which has the effect of approval; LeFevere added that the Met Council does not have a legal basis to turn the Plan down or to disapprove it. The Met Council does have the option to take the dispute to the legislature. If LMCD disagrees with a Met Council decision, it can appeal again to the Met Council. If LMCD still disagrees, it can go the legislature. LMCD would want to dissuade the Met Council from also going to the legislature. The best way to do that is to get the Met Council into LMCD's process so they see what LMCD has been through, and thus give it the best shot to get together with the cities to resolve the issues. There was further discussion to concur that LMCD is prepared to work with the cities to resolve the differences and in turn alleviate any need to turn to the legislature by either the Met Council or LMCD. The discussion then was directed bark to the amount of time for extending the Met Council's comment period. Cochran agreed to accept a motion for a 90 -day delay in the Metropolitan Council's 60-day review - and - comment period due to expire February 4, 1991, subject to the Metropolitan Council's providing staff to facilitate the agreement. Martinson and Grathwol agreed to amend their earlibr motion to reflect the 90 -day delay and staff assistance offer by the Metropolitan Council. The motion carried unanimously. 7.A.2) Update, Meetings with Cities on Management Plan Resolution, Shoreland Rules. Cochran, Grathwol, Arndorfer, Steve Prestin and the executive director met January 10 with Spring Park's mayor, planner, attorney and clerk. A Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Shoreland Protection Management Objectives was presented to the Spring Park officials. Their planner reviewed the unique characteristics of the city's Comprehensive Plan and the density concerns particularly in their R -3 and R -2 districts. The outcome appeared positive, with the consideration that their acceptance of the Memorandum of Understanding would zesult in withdrawing their objections stated in the Resolution. A subsequent meeting with City of Orono administrator and two council members was not conclusive. Orono still insists it will work independently with DNR on the Shoreland Rules adoption. It is also concerned about giving up shoreland density to other lake communities. An attempt to meet with the City of Wayzata could not be arranged in the time ahead of the 1/22/91 Systems Committee meeting. LMCD Board of Directors January 23, 1991 7.A.3) Progress on 1988 -89 Recreational Monitoring Report The amended copy of the Recreational Monitoring Report, a draft of which was provided Board members December 5, will ba available in a final amended form at the February Board meeting, Cochran advised. Comment on the draft had been received from some Board members. 7.A.4) Management Program Provision for Future Amendments A draft of a procedure for amending the Management Program was submitted by the executive director dated 12/12/90. Attorney LeFevere noted that he had not had a chance to review the draft with the executive director. This is an elaborate review process with more notices, public hearings and board reviews than might be needed for some changes. Starting off with notice and at least one public hearing would suffice in most cases. Where a change is controversial and involves much consensus building a more elaborate procedure could be provided for. Foster moved, Martinson seconded, to refer the memorandum to the Advisory Committee. The motion carried unanimously. 7.B. WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Grathwol 7.B.1) Approval of Minutes Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, approval of the minutes of the 1 -12 -91 meeting as submitted. Motion carrl %d, Carlson abstaining. 7.B.2) Minnetonka Boat Rental - Option for Storage of Temporary Rental Pontoon Boat Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, to approve Option 4 of Attorney LeFevere's 1 -2 -91 letter authorizing Minnetonka Boat Rental to delete the permanent storage slip ( #4) at the ramp location and move it to the location at which the pontoon boat is being stored next to slip #8, making that location a storage slip. Motion carried unanimously. 7.8.3) LMCD Code Proposed Amendment to Sec. 2.11 Regarding Conversion of Use of Multiple Docks Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, the first reading of a proposed amendment to Sec. 2.11, Conversion of Use, adding Subd. 5, Determination of Status. Grathwol explained that this provides a uniform way of handling conversions of use as it applies to Excelsior Bay Associates and Chapman Place, which have technical problems with their applications. Reese inquired as to where LMCD ended up on requiring additional amenities in this code amendment. LeFevere advised this code amendment does not go to that point. It is a mechanism for determining what somebody's status is. If someone has a question as to where they fit under the no- conversion ordinance - continued N1 LMCD Board of Directors January 23, 1991 they would , A a hearing on this question. It is a procedure. If a conversion has occurred, the license is subject to the 1:50 rule, or 1 :10 rule if eligible through the provision of amenities. There being no further discussion, the motion carried. 7.B.4) City of Deephaven Request Withdrawn 7.B.5) Amendment to Temporary Low Water Variance Application Form Grathwol moved, Reese seconded, approval of the changes to the Temporary Low Water Variance for temporary dock extension application form as recommended by the staff. Motion carried unanimously. Carlson questioned if applicants are referred co cities, such as Minnetrista, for their dock permit requirements. He was assured that appli are advised that they must check with the municipality of location to see if it also requires a permit. Staff should be aware what cities have dock permit requirements. 7. B. 6 ) Refunds Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, approval of the following refunds: * Minnetonka application * Minnetonka application * Minnetonka application * Bean's Greei $100 Boat Works - $100 Boat Works - $100 Boat Works - $100 zwood Marina, (Wayzata), new dock license (Orono), new dock license (Orono), special density variance application denied - * Driftwood Shores, overpayment on application renewal fees - $20 Motion carried unanimously. 7.B.7) Deicing Applications Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, approval of the following deicing permits: * Renewals for Clay Cliffe and Dennis Carlson * New Ownership for Minnetonka Marina and Yacht Club (formerly Smith's Bay Marina & Yacht Club) Motion carried unanimously. 7.B.8) Complaint re Name Similarity Cochran reported calls from the Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club and the Minnetonka Yacht Club about the similarity of the Minnetonka Marina and Yacht Club name. LeFevere advised that it would be up to the complainant to protect its interests. i LMCD Board of Directors January 23, 1991 7.C. EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL TASK FORCE, Chair Reese 7.C.1) Progress on Barging /Trucking Contract Reese reported there have been seven requests for the speci- fications for the barging /trucking contrG.;t. Bid opening is 2/4/91. Once this cost is established, a EWM budget for 1991 will be prepared. Grathwol expressed concern for the outcome of the EWM budget considering the funding problems and prospective higher barging costs. 7.C.2) Report on MN DNR Meeting Regarding Control of Spread of EWM Reese reported on a 1/19/91 meeting at the Freshwater Foundation to discuss EWM control. The meeting was well attended with many outstate people. Thirty -three lakes have EWM. The meeting was well run by a DNR trained facilitator. The general consensus was that quarantine and monitoring at access points are not realistic. There were a number of legislators in attendance. Many suggestions were made to monitor /control its spread. The group will meet on a continuing basis as there is ongoing education. Reese suggested the best place to start is in the schools. 7.C.3) Project Manager. An advertisement has been placed for a project manager to replace Norm Paurus. There has been one applicant. 7.C.4) Funding. The contribution flow continues to be slow. If Hennepin County funds are not forthcoming there will be budget adjustments. 7.C.5) Other Foster reported a digitized map on a University of Minnesota computer is planned to be used to illustrate EWM infestations. lie also reported there is ongoing investigation of a biological solution to the EWM problem using a fungus. He also noted there is not a consensus from the angling community or DNR fisheries personnel that EWM is a totally bad thing. 7.1). LAKF USX, Chair Pillsbury 7.D.1) Approval of Minutes. Pillsbury moved, Grathwol seconded, to approve the minutes of the 1 -14 -91 meeting as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 7.D.2) 1991 Hennepin County's Lake Services and Projects Program Pillsbury re -)crted the proposed budget for 1991 Lake Minnetonka improvements of $174,000 reported by Denis Bailey, Hennepin County Lake Im;irovement Section, to the Lake Use Committee has since been ieduced to $124,000. Adjustments will have to be made in t;;e program. 7 LMCD Board of Directors January 23. 1991 7.D.3) Navigational Buoy Programs Foster objected to the Lake Use Committee recommendation to continue the "danger" buoy placement in lieu of channel navigation buoys, to mark channels of 2 -1/2' depth or less. It is his opinion that they should be used along with the normal channel markings. Sgt. Chandler said using the channel markings would be misleading, even with the danger buoys. County legal counsel recommends danger buoys to protect boats from damage. Carlson suggested using the newspapers to publicize the purpose of the danger buoys marking the channels. Cochran moved, Grathwol seconded, to continue the "danger" buoy, slow buoy and navigation buoy programs in 1991 on the same basis as 1990, and to publicize the purpose and description of the danger buoy marking in channels. Motion carried, Foster voting nay. 7.D.4) Special Event Licenses 7.D.4a) Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, approval of two new events: Excelsior Chamber of Commerce's Chili Open and Lafayette Club ice fishing and sleigh ride party. Motion carried unanimously. 7.D.4b) Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, to approve the refund of a $100 overpayment on an event application by Lord Fletchers. Motion carried unanimously. 7.D.4c) Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, to rescind the 1 -24- 90 stipulation placed on the Holiday- Johnson Crappie Contest requiring map distribution, replacing it with a requirement that their newspaper advertisements for the event advise participants that navigation buoys on Lake Minnetonka may not be in place. Motion_ carried unanimously. 7.D.5) 1991 LMCD Special Deputy Award. The Board accepted the Committee recommendation of a Special Deputy, to be announced at the 2 -21 -91 Save the Lake dinner. 7.D.6) Water Patrol Report Sgt. Chandler reported there have been nineteen ice emergencies in the County. In the past ten days, two more motorized vehicles have gone through the ice. The fish rouse count has started. It has been delayed because of the number of thefts. There are eight new special deputies and seven have entered the program for a one year training, for a total of forty -five personnel. A fifth full time, licensed deputy has been assigned to the Water Patrol, highest number of deputies ever. There have been five DWI arrests, two involving personal injuries. One of the two deputies injured last month in snowmobile chase accidents has returned to duty. The other is still recuperating. LMCD Board of Directors 7.E. FINANCIAL REPORTS January 23. 1991 E.1) The statement of cash transactions for the month ending 12 -31 -90 was received and ordered filed. E.2) Audit of Vouchers for Payment Cochran moved, Martinson seconded, approval of Checks No. 6614 through 6706 in the amount of $38,705.97. Motion carried unanimously. Reese questioned if using the District truck for staff transportation in lieu of paying mileage would be a savings to the District. Grathwol noted the newspaper publication costs are high. He suggested checking with other publications for fee schedules. 7.E.3) United Marine International Offer to Settle 1990 Warranty Clam Ree --e reported UMI the 1990 warranty clai Weed Harvesters: $9,450.42 - 2,125.00 7,325.42 has made the following offer to settle n for hydraulic problems on UMI Aquatic Original Total Claim LMCD Labor - forgiven Balance due LMCD UMI proposed to send a check to LMCD for an initial amount of $3,662.71 and to further provide LMCD with a credit of :3,662.71 for parts and /or service to be used as required. Reese moved, Foster seconded, to instruct the Executive Director to settle the claim witn UMI in accordance with their offer. Motion carried unanimously. 7.F. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, Strommen Cochran noted receipt of a memorandum from the Executive Director in which he discusses priorities for December and January. 8. Unfinished Business None 9. New Business Foster moved, Reese seconded, to authorize staff to prepare an appropriate application for the 1992 -94 funding cycle from the Legislative Commission on Minnesota Resources before the 2 -15 -91 deadline. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Adjournment There being no further business, Foster moved, Reese seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Signatures -Page 10 9 LMCD Board of Directors David Cochran, Chair Douglas Babcock, Secretary January 23, 1991 10 RECD F E L � , LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DIS'1RICT Action Report: Water Structures and Dock Committee Meeting: Saturday, Febriary 9, 1991, 7:30 a.m. Wayzata Norwest Bank Building Community Room Members Present: Bent Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Chair, Excelsior; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Thomas Reese, Mound; JoFllen Hurr, Orono; Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; Dave Bartos, Victoria; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. 1. David Thomas Bayshore II LeFevere reviewed the Bayshore II license Order and covenants, easement conditions and restrictions. He said the documents, in their present form, are acceptable as the lakeshore lots give up all their docking rights to the homeowners' association. David Thomas, and Tuck Thomas, developers, and Dennis Trooien, Attorney representing the developers, were present. Trooien indicated they had assumed the original documents they submitted were acceptable when they received the DNR approval. It is their belief the current documents satisfy the LMCD requirements. Reese asked for an explanation of how this differs from "funnel" lots. The Executive Director explained that in this case there is 385' of shoreland. Under the LMCD code of 1:50' shoreland density, eight slips are allowed. Five slips will be allowed on the common dock for the off -shore properties and three riparian lots will be allowed one .slip each. All dockage will be under the control of the Homeowners' Association through an 8' easement on the shoreline. In response to a question from Hurr, Trooien said each property owner will sign off on the covenants. Bartos moved, Bjorlin seconded, to recommend approval of the covenants on Bayshore II subject to LeFevere's detailed review of the documents presented 2/9, confirming that they meet LMCD requirements. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Variance Background - Jeannie Bowers, Greenwood A Public Hearing will be held on 2 -27 -91 to consider the request of Jeannie Bowers, 21600 Fairview Street, Greenwood, for an adjusted lot line extension and /or setback and length variance due to converging lot lines. The committee received a memo from the Executive Director, dated 2 -6 -91, detailing the facts leading up to the application. The Executive Director asked for questions on the facts, requesting the Committee defer discussion of the application merits to the Public Hearing. Additional Comments: It is not known how Bowers' neighbors will react if there are Dock Use Area adjustments along the shore to accommodate bow - rs low water access. - continued 1. Water Structures and Environment Committee February 9, 1991 Pillsbury noted that LMCD has encountered similar situations. Staff is to review a Libbs Lake and a Deephaven case mentioned by Pillsbury for the Board's information. The committee asked for the Code reference which allows LMCD to make Dock Use Area adjustments. (See Sec. 1.07, Subd. 1, 2, 7.) Information should be obtained as to how many boats Bowers will dock. Stromm,-in no *ed this point will be established at the Public Hearing. The docks involved are all temporary docks. 3. Variance Background - The Harborage The Harborage has requested a variance to their dock license to adjust their dock use area, or for a side set back variance. A Public Hearing will be held on 2 -27 -91 to consider the request. Thibault presented visuals of the changes in The Harborage dock configuration since 1987. A staff fact memo dated 2 -4- -91 included LeFevere's suggestions: 1) To allow a side setback variance or 2) increase the dock use area by adjusting the eastern property line to be perpendicular to the shore. He prefers the first option. There were comments about The Harborage ignoring previous requests that they either bring their dock configuration in compliance with their site plan approved with their Order or apply for a variance. 4. Proposed Code Amendment to 2.11 Conversion of Use Grathwol reported on the first reading of the proposed amendment at the Board meeting on 1- 23 -91. Grathwol explained the effect on the Excelsior Bay Associates and Chapman Place dock licenses Excelsior Bay Associates has not made any change in what was originally intended. A conversion appears to exist because of a transfer of ownership in the docks from the independent owner to the condominium's homeowners association. The City of Excelsior originally stated it will not grant permission for public access to the docks. The Excelsior Bay Associates permit was granted before the current conversion of use Ordinance was adopted. The Chapman Flace docks involve a change in operating management, with more influence and control being exerted by the condominium owners. Chapman Place was licensed after the conversion of use ordinance adoption. Grathwol said this code amendment does not solve the status of the Excelsior Bay Associates and Chapman Place docks but does set up a procedure for appealing to the Board any determination as to conversion of use identified by the Executive Director. Hurr objected to the Executive Director determining a status without, the Board's knowledge. Foster expressed concern about adopting the ordinance without setting out detailed procedures. - continued 2 Water Structures and Environment Committee February 9, 1991 Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend approval of Grathwol's appointment of a sub - committee consisting of Cochran, Rascop and Grathwol to recommend a solution to the Excelsior Bay Associates and Chapman Place compliance with docx license orders with LeFevere. Motion carried unanimously. Foster moved, Hurr seconded, to recommend tabling the second reading of the proposed Code amendment. Motion carried, Reese voting nay. 5. Wetland Inventory Progress Update Thibault reported she bad met with Charles Melony to identify wetland inlets, using the aerial maps. They located a few which will be added to the inventory. Input from Board members will be appreciated. Thibault has visited the University of Minnesota Forest Resources, Water Quality Division, which has the GIS computerized mapping of Lake Minnetonka using overlays for various identifications. Adding wetlands as an overlay would be possible. The Division is presently still adding the Eurasian Water Milfoil infestation data. It was agreed to investigate the cost of mapping the wetlands. Hurr commented that cooperation with the University of Minnesota is a public relations plus. 6. Multiple Dock Length Study Thibault submitted a summary of multiple dock lengths. The lengths are based on the Ordinary High Water Line placement. The lengths are taken from the applications and have been verified by annual inspections. Hurr suggested the need for registered dock surveys rather than scale drawings. The high cost of registered surveys and use of seasonal docks making the dock placement somewhat variable each year were cited as making registered surveys a cost burden. It was further explained docks are to be no longer than 100' except where a variance has been granted, per Sec. 2.03 and Sec. 1.07, to extend a dock to a maximum of 200' An additional 25' may be allowed for a ga6 dock extension. 7. Residential Temporary Low Water Extension Policy Review The committee received a re -draft of a Resolution Regarding Residential Temporary Dock Extensions Without a Permit Application. Thibault reported receipt of a phone call from Jeff Fox, Sery -A -Dock, questioning the navigational water depth of three feet in this extension policy. He feels 45" would be more realistic. He also thinks there should be a dock length limitation. Bjorlin moved, Foster seconded, to recommend approval of the Resolution as submitted with the addition of a clause encouraging neighbors to go together to share docks during a low water period. Motion carried unanimously. 3 Water Structures and Environment Committee February 9, 1991 8A. Multiple Dock and DMA License Renewals The committee received the list of dock licensees requesting renewals for 1991, including orders, stipulations, etc. Village certificates have been received or time has expired for responses. Hurr moved, Foster seconded, to recommend approval of the following: * Twenty -nine renewals without change (No history of temporary extensions) * Renewals with Minor Changes: Grandview Point Association, Carsons Bay Back License 1990 from : 5 BSU, 9 WSU To: 8 BSU, 11.5 WSU Renewal for 1991: 8 BSU, 11.5 WSU Rossberg, A. F., South Upper Lake (Formerly Adeline Johnston) New Owner * Multiple Dock License Renewals Without Change With Temporary Dock Extension Renewals - No Change Chimo Association,Carsons Bay - 50' extension total length 147' Herzog Acres Association, Wayzata Bay - 22' extension, total length 110' Libbs Bay Boat Club, Libbs Lake - 12' extension, total length 147' Motion carried unanimously. The committee discussed the Minnetonka Yacht Club request for a 40' extension at their Carson Bay facility. It would provide a temporary dock for rigging the sailboats buoyed at Carson Bay, the normal dock location for this purpose being too shallow. It would not interfere with navigation. Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend approval of the multiple dock license renewal without change with temporary dock extension renewal - no change: Minnetonka Yacht Club /Lake Minnetonka Sailing School - 40' extension, total length 76' Site 1 - 10' extension, total length 10' Site 3 Motion carried unanimously. B3orlin moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend approval of the following temporary dock extensions with changes: Baycliffe Property Owners Association, South Upper Lake - New dock layout Boulder Bridge Homeowners Association, South Upper Lake - increase from 124' to 144' Gideons P ^int Homeowners Association, Gideons Bay - Decrease from 180' to 160' Methodist Lakeside Assembly, Wayzata Bay - Increase from 184' to 264' Minnetonka Power Squadron, Big Island Passage - New Site Plan Smithtown Bay Association, Smithtown Bay - Decrease from 198' to 160' - continued 4 Water Structures and Environment Committee February 9, 1991 Thibault showed visuals of the layouts. There were questions about the Methodist Lakeside Assembly dock length increase. Slocum pointed out that the dock is located well away from boat traffic. Motion carried unanimously. Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, recommended approval of the following District Mooring Area renewal applications for 1991: City of Deephaven City of Excelsior Methodist Lakeside Assembly Minnetonka Yacht Club The committee requested a scale drawing be included with the Methodist Lakeside As- ..embly application for a temporary DMA extension showing the mooring area distance from the requested dock extension. Motion carried unanimously. 8B. Declaration of Low Water Foster moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend declaring 1991 a low water year (below 928.0). Motion carried unanimously. There was no action on whether to use 3' or 4 -1/2' for a navigable depth for temporary dock extensions. 9. Deposit Refund Bjorlin moved, Pillsbury seconded, to recommend approval of a $100 refund to William Schritter for a permanent dock application. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Wetland Sub - - Committee Grathwol suggested forming a sub - committee to work on wetlands, reviewing related ordinances. Hurr moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approval of a sub- committee consisting of Babcock (Chair), Hurr, Reese and Carlson to work with the wetland inventory. Motion carried unanimously. Foster suggested the Board members accompany Thibault on a viewing of wetlands in their respective community shoreland. 11. Boat Definition Bjorlin was given information on the location of canoe racks and was advised a boat of less than 16' and 10 hp is not a countable boat. 12. LCMIZ Funding The Executive Director submitted the LCMR invitation for natural resource project ideas. He submitted four suggestions and the following were added by the committee: - continued 5 Harvesting management for EWM control; Investigate innovative wads to increase harvesting productivity; Analysis of the impact on fishing by the in" �tion of EWM. 1 ENVIRONMENT 1. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Reese lA. Bid Results for Barging /Trucking Contracts Reese reported one bid was received for barging and trucking the harvested weeds, according to the approved specifications. Reese moved, Foster seconded, to recommend approval of t. bid of Minnetonka Portable Dredging to provide barge service at. $285.00 per hour and truck service at $42.50 per hour. Motion carried unanimously. 1.B. Budget Update Reese submitted a 1991 budget proposal reflecting the anticipated costs using the barge off -load compared with the 19 °0 actual and what the costs would be for 1991 if the shore off -load were used. The total cost is budgeted at $264,500 for the barge off -load cr:,;pared with $207,730 for the shore off -load. The amount of isWM to be harvested was suggested by Reese to increase at least two -fold using the barge off -load, thereby reducing the cost per ton cut. Reese reported the following projected income for 1991 to off -set the cost: $63,000 From the Cities 30,000 MN DNR 85,000 Hennepin County 75,000 Private Funding $253,000 Total The funds from the county are not confirmed and are in doubt. $21,000 is in from the private solicitation to date, $27,000 total including Save the Lake designated funds. Reese said Congressman Jim Ranistad has offered to fellow up on the Corps of Engineer application for funds. I.C. Applicants for Project Manager Position Reese reported there ar: two f( the Proj�ict Manager position. One has been i.ntervie -w-1 and ti , th +;r w i l l he interviewed before the Board meeting. A recomn�c- ndation will be forwarded to the Board. 1.1). Lakeshore Pick Up Program Reese said there is no legal bar to tIiF, LMr�D c.��r,t r ti119 with a private operator to pick up F;WM irc private E >rup�;rty beaches and disposing of the weeds on th t,�rEr� L�E''evere summarized the contractual ,, mFrrn�, drat. «,d t 91. oun t, i n"ved G I Water Structures and Environment Committee February 9. 1991 Foster said he would encourage private weed harvesters using the LMCD barge to off -load their weeds. The Executive Director said he has talked to Dave Gustafson, Lake Minnetonka Lakeshore Owners Association. He has an interested prospect for shore weed pick up. The Executive Director cautioned about developing a weed off -load to the barge program which would interfere with the LMCD operation. Hurr said she believes there should be a charge for off - loading to the barge. Reese moved, Foster seconded, to pursue a concept of shore pick up of private weeds for disposal in the LMCD barge, the LMCD working with private entrepreneurs. Motion carried, Hurr voting nay. Adj urnment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 a.m. FOR TM COMMIT`I"EE: Eugene Strommen, Executive Director James N. Grathwol, Chair 7 CITY (AN 1( )( 'ND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA KOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARINU TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING AT 4757 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 "Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 12, 1991 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow an oversized attached garage at 4757 Island View Drive, legally uescribed as Lot 11, Block. 7, Devon, PID #E30- 117 -23 22 0059. All persons appeariig at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk Published in "The Laker" 2 -25 -91 and mailed to property "Wil(Irs within 350 feet of subject property on 3 -1 -91. MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING VITH THE CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, AND PARKS & OPEN SPACE COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 1991 The following persons were in attendan:e: Mayor Skip Johnson, City Council Members Andrea Ahrens, Ken Smith, Liz Jensen, and PhyIIi Jessen; Planning Commission Members Bill Meyer, Chair; Geoff Michael, Frank Weiland, Jerry Clapsaddle, Michael Mueller, and Mark Hanus; Economic Development Commission Members Paul Meisel, Chair; Jerry Pietrowski, Mark Brewer, Jerry Longpre, Ben Marks, Sharon McMenamy -Cook, and Mark Machart; Park Commission Members Brian Asleson, Chair; Tom Casey, Marilyn Byrnes, Shirlev Andersen, Neil Weber, Caroiyn Schmidt, Lyndelle Skoglund, and Cathy Bailey; City Manager, Ed Shukle; Building Official, Jon Sutherland; Parks Director, Jim Fackler; and Secretary, Peggy James. The meeting commenced at 6:35 p.m. Each person in attendance introduced themselves and briefly ex- plained their relation with the City. City Manager, Ed Shukle, reviewed each of the Commission's duties and responsibilities as set forth in the Mound City Code. A. City Council's Long Term Issues: 1) Liz Jensen - Rental Housing L;censing Rental Housing Maintenance - Truth in Housing - Lost Lake - signs: visual impact (Marley's Kitchen, King Coin Laundry) - five year parks /commons improvement plan - mission staterrent for city - tie annua l reports to budget process, include department goals and objectives 2) Phyllis Jessen - council salaries should be reviewed - designate /mark snowmobile accesses, keep sleds on F- .?:hs, out of wetlands Joint Meeting February 19, 1991 Page 2 3) Ken Smitti - customer service, employees - housing maintenance, paint- a -thons B. City Council's Short Term Issues: l) Liz Jensen - derelict automobiles, need to be Pro- active to clean up - sidewalk snow removal (downtown and County Rd. 15) - makA downtown user friendly for walkers - taping applicant interviews for commission vacancies - dog droppings (require owners to pick -up after their pets) - 1991 parks /commons improvement plans 2) Phyllis Jensen - dumpsters - olue plastic fences C. Planning Commission's Long and Short Term Issues: - zoning code modifications: garage sizes, reduce number of unnecessary variances - Rental Housing Ma;ntenance / Truth in Housing / Housing Ma i nte! , ,ince - downtown: - design review board - give Mound better image - identify niche to establish base around which to build (Long Lake: service, Wayzata: boutique, Mound: hardware ?) - overall pian (architecture /style) - buildinq materials - review previous plan - on- street parking from 9-3 joint Meeting February 19, 1991 Page 3 D. Economic Development Commissions Long and Short Term Issues: - conflict of uses in downtown - 20 year plan - immediate plan - make downtown an amenity with its own identity design, business promotion, development use grant dollars Lost Lake link the business area with parks and the lake Tonka Toys building, use brings more people to town full time Economic Development Director it takes a lot of time as volunteers increase number of people involved, start in neighbor- hoods: crime watch, blo parties - welcome wagon for residences and business - press releases - use local papers to publicize the town - review lost lake plans from U of M - commercial development done economically right pays for the parks E. Park Commission's Long and Term Term Issues: - re- examine 5 year parks /commons improvement plan for next 5 years - docks: fees, use of herbicides /pesticides - nature conservation areas / green spares - definition of nature conservation area - inventory of public space - maintenance and upkeep - adoption program - prevent dumping - sidewalks /bikeways, bike racks in town - sidewalk inspection program - alternative methods of transport, incentives - fall leaf pick -up, promote use of Minnetrista compost site - recreational grog ram. for teens through community serv- ices weeds in Lake Minnetonka (in and out) wetland protection: snowmobile damage to habitat versus access to lake, trail marking, education through sct1oo1 s Joint Meeting February 19, 1991 Page 4 - commons: identify, promote the value and benefits, education program for realtors - grant dollars for parks - environmental protection - get a grant writer for nature conservation area survey F. Informal Interchange /Exchange of Ideas by All Present - planninq For Mound's 100 year centennial celebration, get personal histories now "Project Mound" e.g, redwood falls Shoreland Management Plan: impact on Lost Lake develop- ment, shoreland management ordinance - Mound City Days: hot air balloon rides, community church service - EDC challenges other commissions and city council on the best float in City Days parade - outdoor skating rink on the lake or downtown (use christmas trees to designate) - "Welcome to Mound" sign at Biack Lake bridge - utility poles: telephone, electric, cable - can we clean -up or bury? - garage sale signs: community bulletin board - tree crdinance: protect /save the trees, residential and commercial - cross walk at House of Moy needs lighting or something, it is unsafe - more public phones in Mound, safety issue - investigate timing of light at Lynwood and Commerce semi trailer /commercial vehicles in residential/ downtown - pedestrian walkway from House of Moy lot to Coast to Coast lot The meeting terminated at 9:3`-, p.m.