The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-03-12 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - 3 - -91 ��l Page ,1 1 G B 1J D A • J A T'= TY OF MOUND XCUEND, MINNESOTA MOUND - COUNCIL REGULAR MMEETING 7:30 TUESDAY. MARCH 12, 19 991 CITY CCIIHO:CIL CHAMBERS 1. - :'LE2 - OF ALLEGIANCE. 2. A P = OVE MINUTES OF FE RY 26, 1991, REGULAR KZ-7_ -ING. Pg. 513 -518 3. ?_= SCGLUTION PROCLAIMIN•= =.= SCOUT WEEK IN THE OF MOUND, MARCH : = -1 1991. Pg. 519 4. P 7BLLIC HE CASE #9I - TOM EFFERTZ, 4 - 57 ISLAND VIEW DRI4E, L, 11, BLOCK 7, 2EVC -011, PID #30- 117 -23 .72 0059. �uL''EST: CONDITIONAL :SE PERMIT - OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BI _LDIING. Pg. 520 -532 5. :c:Qt;UEST TO USE MOUND lk? PARK AS WEIGH -IN SITE FOR =_L BASS FISHING C` %7ESST, AMERICAN SCHOURSHIP • :'= L'NIlDATION - SUNDAY, - 16, 1991. Pg. 533 6. 4ZMM.MENTS & SUGGESTION_ ?ROOM :ITIZENS PRESENT. 7. CrMMIENTS ON LIQUOR LI APPLICATION FROM AL & A:.MA'.'S FOR CHARTER BOA FCDR PURPOSES OF MEETING Z:hI =ING ORDINANCE REQL=:R ME:ENTS. Pg. 534 -537 8. C=MMI-IENTS ON AN APPLICA7IO2;': FOR A MULTIPLE DOCK & M :CRP.ING AREA LICENSE =-)M . MINNETONKA BOAT RENTALS =R PURPOSES OF MEETING ZCONING ORDINANCE - QL:;IREMENTS. Pg. 538 -540 9. SET BID OPENING DATE _'ZR :.ANNUAL SEALCOAT PROJECT. f =�G_GESTED DATE - APR: 9., 1991). Pg. 541 10. S =T BID OPENING DATE ='ZR -.LIST STATION TMPROVEMF..NTS . (=- GGGESTED DATE - APR: 9. 1991) . Pg. 542 11. -.,: .._ PR- kOVAL OF LICENSES Z ?EF_:R !ITS . hg . 54 3 12. n= PR OF CHANGE OR= ?S - CITY HALI, ADDITION & MCDDELING. Pg. 544 -547 13. =?.YMF`_E►dT OF BILLS. Pq. 14. INFOn Page ,1 1 I. REMINDER: Goal Setting /Team Building Session with Barbara Arney, April 6, 1991, 8:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M., City Hall. Material will be sent out ahead of meeting. J. REMINDER: Invitation to attend Downtown Economic Development Prcject Kick -Off Reception, Wednesday, March 1.3, 1911;, -' 5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M., City Hall. lq. t28 K. Attached is a draft of a letter that could } -e sent to the 14 Lake cities from Mayor John: >cn. Skip asked me to have the Council review thi: on Tuesday evening so that it could be sent out by March 13. If you have changes, ple.3:;e bring them to the meeting Tuesday evening. Pg. L. Letter dated March 5, 1991, from DNR re: Operating Procedures for Implementation of Shoreland Management Land Use Controls. • A. Department Head Monthly Reports for February 1991. Pg. 565 -597 B. LMCD Representative's Monthly Report for February 1991. Pg. 598 -601 C. LMCD mailings. Pg. 602 -607 D. Planning Commission Minutes of February .6, 1991. Pg. 608 -613 E. Article entitled, "Cable Reform Achievable: Mayor Finds It Needs Your Support ", written by Dave Karp in the N ation's Cities w'eekiy, dated February 25, 1991, on cable television. Ptj. �;1•; -F,i ; F. League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Annual Legislative Conference is scheduled for April 10, 1991, St. Paul Radisson. 7f you are interested in attending, let Fran know ASAP. F'g E.G -617 G. Compilation and Analysis of U.S. Census data as prepared by the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board. Pg. 610 - 627 H. RE MINDER: C.O.W. Meeting, Tuesday, March 19, 1991, 7:00 P.M. City Hall. I. REMINDER: Goal Setting /Team Building Session with Barbara Arney, April 6, 1991, 8:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M., City Hall. Material will be sent out ahead of meeting. J. REMINDER: Invitation to attend Downtown Economic Development Prcject Kick -Off Reception, Wednesday, March 1.3, 1911;, -' 5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M., City Hall. lq. t28 K. Attached is a draft of a letter that could } -e sent to the 14 Lake cities from Mayor John: >cn. Skip asked me to have the Council review thi: on Tuesday evening so that it could be sent out by March 13. If you have changes, ple.3:;e bring them to the meeting Tuesday evening. Pg. L. Letter dated March 5, 1991, from DNR re: Operating Procedures for Implementation of Shoreland Management Land Use Controls. • 29 February 26, 1991 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 26, 1991 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, February 26, 1991, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, and Phyll -s Jessen. Councilmember Ken Smith was absent and excused. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John Cameron, Building Official Jon Sutherland, Fire Chief Don Bryce and the following interested citizens: Judy Bryce, Richard Schaad, David & Ann Marie Langrud, Gary Strand, Geoff Michael, George Haugh, Greg Anderson, Mark Harzus, and Rick Lindlan. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 1.0 MINUTES MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to approve the minutes of the February 12, 1991, Regular Meeting with the following correction: In those present change the name of the Mayor from Steve Smith to Skip Johnson. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.1 CA #91 -003: DAVID L 1717 AVOCET_ 5, BT20CK 8, DREAMWOOD, PI D - # 13- 117 -24 21 0023, LOT SIZE AND SIDE YAR SETBACK VARIANCES TO ALLOW STRU ALTER ATIONS The Building Official explained the request. In his revit -,; of tho nouse it is substandard except for the found :tion. ahe, 'fanning Commission reviewed the request- last night an.l the minutes were presented to the Council. On a 5 to 2 v,>t.e tt:c_ recommended approval with the seven con(l i t ions s.rg<Ic ;ted by t t: Building Official and added three others. The Building Utfici,:l stated that a new survey was submitted 1)y thc� appl ic.tnt. which shows that the variance needed for the north property lir,c setback is only .2 feet. The conditions recommended wt�ri 1 follows: Staff recommends approval of the variance as rcciuc:;tr i t ; afford the property owner reasonirble usF of hi:; subject to compliance with the following conditions: u S /� 30 February 26, 1991 1) The complete crawl space be excavated to provide for adequate air circulation around the floor joist system. UBC Section 2516(a) requires a minimum of 18" to the bottom of wood joists or a minimum of 12 to the bottom of girders. 2) The crawl space be ventilated by an approved mechanical means per UBC Section 2516 (a). 3) Any exterior wall or ceiling that is modified and has piaster, Gypsum board or siding removed is to be insulated to current energy code for its specific component. 4) A heat lost calculation by a qualified mechanical contractor shall be submitted. 5) The central heating plant be thoroughly inispected and checked for proper operation by a qualified mech,i n i ca 1 contractor who will supply a house heating test record form as supplied by the Building Official. Properly sized duct work for supply and return air must be provided to e,ich portion/ room of the house. 6) Included, but adequately addressed within the Building Code, that any and all structural modifications be properly designed and installed. 0 7) That all other aspects of the building that are modified be brought into compliance with current code as re;iuirc3 t>y the Building Official. The Planning Commission recommended arpro%—1 with t;,t, r: ove 7 conditions and the following other sti Pill , ion:: 1. A current certificate of survey be providod showirF.j the building location and setbacks from the lot lines. 2. No variance for a garage be granted in the fart urc dtr�_ t t.ho lot size. 3 . The City Attorney review the p o s s i b i l i t y of r ersu i r i rrl , letter of credit or performance bond to th completed; and if the project is not inishf cl, wf;.�t r�,e ;;ur:;e would the City have. The Council discus: >ed rr _,uiring a letter of cr.e,dit r >r p_r fr;rr.,ar, t_ bond to make s ; re the project is finished. The C i t -, ;,' t r, rrttry explained that it has not been city practico to re lu i r f performance bond when acquiring a Building Pere„ t an! t:) r t ; i r(� this would not be treating everyone the s.rme. 0 SIH 31 • February 26, 1991 The Building Official poi.ted out that #1 of the stipulations the Planning Commission recommended is completed. The Council then discussed having a Truth in Housing requitement which would have exposed the problems with the undersized lot and tiie variances required before the people purchased the property. Councilmember Jensen stated that the Planning Commission is continuing to work on the Rental Housing Maintenance Code, the Housing Maintenance Code and the Truth in Housing requirements. Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #91 -36 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH TKE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS TO APPROVE THE LOT SIZE AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCES TO ALLOW STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS TO LOT 5, BLOCK 8, DREAMWOOD, PID #13- 117 -24 21 0023, 1717 AVOCET LANE (P & Z CASE #91 -003) The Council asked the the Staff 1 -7 be incorporated into the resolution and =2 of t: Planning • Commission recommendations. The vote was 3 in favor with Jensen v,,ting nay. Mot i carried. 1.2 RE UQ EST FRO GARY STRAND TO CO NNLIICT TO MOUND UTIf.TTIES, LOT 5, BLOC 1, __ WOOD E _MI;` N ETRISTA The City Engineer explained that thi:. are.i of Mir.:: been platted into 5 large lots. Mr. Strand is to his Lot 5 into two lots and would li }:e 2 sewer corm ions and 2 water connections from Mound. The City Encjine(,r rt denial of the request for water connections Mound's watermain does not front on the subjc,;:t: property. Iic recommends -i approval of the two sewer connections contingent ipprovol by the City of Minnetrista and the execution of tio. stand.ird agreement. The connection charge for the two building sites would be $7,428.08. If the lot is not divided, oro sr-rvice would be $7, 011.08. This does not include the SAC or permits that may be required. Mr. Strand was present and stated that he w.i�; at Meeting and they wanted him to check with the owner:; c;f I,ot :; 3 & 4 to see if they also wanted to connect: to Mound utt i 1 it i 'I hc> City Engineer stated that those lots could not hE c, �ncc.tc l to this line without extending the sewer line +r) tho:;r7 lot:;. • S! S 32 February 26, 1991 Jessen moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #91 -37 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE 2 SEWER CONNECTIONS FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 1, WOODVIEW ESTATES (MINNETRISTA) CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF MINNETRISTA AND EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT BY ALL PARTIES The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.3 1990 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPOR The following Department Heads presented their arnual rti:orts to the City Council: City Clerk Fran Clark; Fire Chief Don F',rv.-:c; and Building Official Jon Sutherland. The City Counr-il t} i the Department Heads for their reports indicating their appreciation for the reporting process. COMM ENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Mike Mueller stated that the Greater Minneapolis Realtors are in complete support of a Truth in lion sing C,;i. fc: cities. 1.4 SET PUBLIC HEARI FOR Y EAR XVII- __(1991) - URBAN HENNEPI COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVEL BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM MOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by Jensen to set April 9, 1991, for a public hearing on the Year XVII (1991) Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.5 LICENS REN EWALS The following licenses are up for renewal: G_ar_ha_ge D Blackowiak & Son Westonka Sanitation C i 9a rette Al & Alma's Supper ::lub American Legion #398 Ben Franklin Rricklev's Market Jubilee Foods Randy's Sanitation Woodlake Sanitation Moyer' M:und Mun T. PDQ Fool Storf- SuperAr�:��ric <� -4 1 �i•: Thrifty Whitf Dri;�j VFW # "111 • • SU 33 February 26, 1991 "':sere is also a request from the Northwest Tonka Lions for the following permits: Charitable Organization 3.2 Beer Permit Public Dance Permit (Please waive fee) Set -Up Permit (Please waive fee) MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to approve the licenses & permits as presented above and issue above when all required forms, insurance, etc. have been returned. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.6 PAYMENT OF BILLS MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens to authorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre -list in the amount of $223,251.63, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. INF ORMATIO N MISCE LLANEOU S A. January 1991 Financial Report as prepar, i b_ John ':c_;r:7:,in, Finance Director. B. LMCD mailings. C. Park & Open Space Commission Minutes of Feb r�;•. r} D. Planning Commission Minutes of February 11, 1991. E. Economic Development Commission Minutes c: F. Invitation from MWCC to attend brew } :fa!;t t i nc to _1 i a draft of the updated MWCC Wastewater Handling Implementation Plan (1990 - 2010) irll information. G. A goal setting session will be held on S'It-11rd-: 1' 1991, starting at 5:00 A.M. in the Council H. Reminder of Committee of the Whole Meet i ncl 7:00 P.M. I. The Lake Area Mayors will be mee•tinq c r: F!:r discuss the LMCD Shoreland Man,vje mr.nt: • 51? 34 February 26, 1991 • ADD -ON 1.7 SET _ DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to set March 12, 1991, for a public hearing to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow and oversize attached garage at 4757 island View Drive. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. MOTION made by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to adjourn at 9:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk 9 • .51 t 0 RESOLIITION NU. 91- March 12, 1991 RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING GIRL SCOUT WEER WHEREAS, March 12, 1991, marks the 79th birthday of the Girl Scouts; and WHEREAS, Girl Scouts of the United State: of America recognizes that today's girls will be tomorrow's leaders; and WHEREAS, Girl Scouts of the United States of America is the largest voluntary organization for girls in the world and draws upon a large resource of positive adult role models; and WHEREAS, the Girl Scout Movo7ent continues to er,pha ; i ze leadership and personal and career dk. alopr;ont for girl_;; arnA WHEREAS, our community and world will to the direct beneficiaries of the skilled young women who are Girl scouts. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Skip Johnson, the Mai or of the City of Mound, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the weak of 1991 to be Girl Scout Week in the City of Moun. C • 5-11 MINU4 5 Of A "ELIING OF THE MOUND ADVISON<' PLANNING COMMISSION February Ii. 1991 Building Official. Jon Sutherland. reviewed the applicants request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction of an oversized attached garage. Currently. the zoning code limits the size of accessory structures to not more than 101 of 4W _ the lot area. or 840 square feet. this proposed garage exceeds both. The applicant's lot area is approximately 7.500 square feet which would allow a 750 square foot garage. The applicant Is proposing a 35' x 36' garage totaling 1.260 square feet. The Proposed addition wilt meet all setback requirements. Staff recommended denial of the request for a CUP to build an oversized accessory structure based on the premise that the criteria for a CUP has not been met and that granting the CUP would not be In harmony with the zoning code. The applicant submitted a revised request for a 32' x 34' garage totaling 1.088 square feet. The Building Official reviewed three sites which the applicant previously commented had oversized garages In the area of his house. There are no building permit records on file for these garages. therefore the garage sizes cannot be verified. the es- timated sizes are as follows: Lit 51 xe Garage_5! ze 3225 Pevon Lane 12.800 1.056 sq ft 47!i Island View Drive 7.500 1.000 sq ft 4717 Island View Drive 7.500 900 sq ft The Commission discussed the request and Chair Meyer reviewed the CUP process. Chair Meyer opened the public hearing. Applicant. Tom Effertz. commented that he needs 6 full size garage because he has two full size cars and a pick -up truck with a plow and he would also like a work bench. He will meet all the setbacks and there wl I I stlII be enough room for visitor parking. He would like to park all his vehicles and other equipment in- side. This addition will also be accompanied by a $80.000 to $90.000 renovation of the existing house which will raise the property value. He also stated that if he Is not allowed to build a decent size garage. he will be forced to sell the property. The Commission discussed the fact that they are considering an amendment to this section of the zoning code. The Building Official suggested that the garage size be limited to 1.000 square feet In order to be consistent with the Building Code. Mr. Effertz agreed to a 1.000 square oot maximum. MOTION made by Voss. seconder! by Weiland to approve the Conditional Use permit for an oversized accessory bulld- Ing of 1.000 square feet maximum. Approval Is based on the findings that no variances are required. this type of construction is consistent with the neighborhood, and the structure will be improved. Motion carried unanint- ousiy. It was suggested that the use of the garage be limited to a residential use only. This case w11i be heard by the City Council on March 12, 1991. Mueller commented thtnt the garage door set-up, limiting the num- ber of garage doors. should he considered ..hen reviewing the zoning code amendments. RESOLUTION #91- PAGE 2 4. This Conditional 9se Permit is granted for the follow- ing legally described property: Lot 11. Block 7. Devon. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorded or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota Statues section 462.3595, Subd. 4. This shall be considered as a restriction on how this property may be used. 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of f i l i n g t h i s resolution w i t h Hennepin County and pay i nq all costs for such recording. Proof of recording shall be filed with the City Clerk. r� Spr AL ( ' A I F N " ( A N K A YN I ) n�aA� J r er PUBLIC BEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZVD ACCESSORY BUILDING AT 4757 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 Mavwood Road, Mound, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 12, 1991 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow an oversized attached garage at 4757 Island View Drive, legally described as l.ot 11, Block 7, Devon, PID #30- 117 -23 22 0059. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. 1/ Francene C. Clark, City Clerk Published in "The Laker" 2 -25 -91 and mailed to property owners 350 feet of subject property on 3 -1 -91. • 5a00L MINUILS Of A NILii14G Of THE MOLINO ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION February 11. 1991 Building Official. Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicants request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction of an oversized attached garage. Currently, the zoning code limits the size of accessory structures to not more than 101 of s _ the lot area. or 840 square feet, this proposed garage exceeds both. The applicant's lot area Is approximately 7.500 square feet which would allow a 750 square foot ga -age. The applicant Is proposing a 35' x 36' garage totaling 1.260 square feet. The proposed addition wlII meet ail setback requirements. Staff recommended denial of the request for a CUP to build an oversized accessory structure based on the prem!se that the criteria for a CUP has not been met and that granting the CUP would not be in harmony with the zoning code. The applicant submitted a revised request for a 32' x 34' garage totaling 1.088 square feet. The Building Official reviewed three sites which the applicant previously commented had oversized garages In the area of his house. There are no building permit records on file for these garages. therefore the garage sizes cannot be verified, the es- timated sizes are as follows: LA-5- Ze Gara9e__5tze 3225 Pevon Lane 12.600 1.056 sq ft 471i Island View Drive 7,500 1.000 sq ft 4717 Island View Drive 7.500 900 sq ft The Commission discussed the request and Chair Meyer reviewed the is CUP process. Chair Meyer opened the public hearing. Applicant. Tom Effertz. commented that he needs a full size garage because he has two full size cars and a pick -up truck with e plow and he would also like a work bench. He will meet all the setbacks and there wl I I still be enough room for visitor parking. He would like to park all his vehicles and other equipment In- side. This addition will also be accompanied by a $80.000 to $90.000 renovation of the existing house which will raise the property value. He also stated that if he Is not allowed to build a decent size garage. he will be forced to sell the property. The ComM scion discussed the fact that they are considering an amendment to this section of the zoning code. The Building Official suggested that the garage size be limited to 1.000 square feet In order to be consistent with the Building Code. Mr. Effertz agreed to a 1.000 square - aot maximum. MOTION made by Voss. seconded by Welland to approve the Conditional Use permit for an oversized accessory build - ing of 1.000 square feet maximum. Approval is based on the findings that no variances are required, this type of construction Is consistent with the neighborhood. and the structure will be improved. Motion carried unanim- ously. It was suggested that the use of the garage be Iimlted to a residential use only. Thts case will be heard by the City Council on March 12. 1991. Mueller commented that the garage door set. up. limiting the num- ber of garage doors, should he considered when reviewing the zoning code amendments. for Thom.rs .r, Effr..r� (if I -or I1, Block 7, iifC'JC?ti flortnel,rn rniinrv, Mint -;ur.i IS and V tew .952.2 s V. t'{ 8 S E E II •. O S.2 s R�L 11 M I!O /sltJ � L,w N to Garef< N�� J ts 155 '+.: r;5=.5- O • tB-2 0 r' .52.5; .r J fn S o p No ✓�G N N � a 4.0 ti0 t. 50. - •, � �,r,' i k V t6.0 .�'• , r et .1 �P .7 i� �'`' •� ..... l�royeJ..f t :944 2' 50.0 c r• AKk STAFF RECOMMENDATION DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of February 11, 1991 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jon Sutherland, uuilding Official �. CASE NO.: 91 -002 APPLICANT: Tom Effertz LOCATION: 4757 Island View Drive LEGAL Devon, Block 7, Lot 11 DESCRIPTION: PID ##30- 117 -23 -22 0059 0 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for Oversized Accessory Building ZONING: R -2 Single Family Residential The applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the construction of an oversized accessory structure, the ap- plicant proposes to remove the existing attached garage and con- struct a new 35' x 36' attached garage. Zoninq Code Section 23.407(3) limits accessory buildings in residentieji ,areas to 10% of the lot area and a maximum of 840 square feet. A l s o noted on the survey is a proposed porch on the south, or lakeside of the house. A variance would be required for this ad- dition, but the applicant has not requested the Planning Commis- sion to review this at this time. COMMENTS The proposed accessory building (35' x 36') totals 1,260 square feet. The lot area as shown by the surveyor is 7,479 squar feet, staff would round this number up to 7,500 square feet.. At the maximum allowable size of 1 of the lot area, the accessory building is limited to 750 square feet. The proposal is in excess of what is allowed by the zoni code in area for acces- sory buildings and area of l coverage. sps" Staff Recommendation Page 2 Case No. 91 -002 0 RECOM MENDATION Staff recommendation is to deny the request for a CUP to build an oversized accessory structure. Based on the premise that the criteria for a CUP has not been met and that granting the CUP would not be in harmony with the zoning code. NOTE This case will be heard by the City Council on March 12, 1991. Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 350' of the subject property. Pj • • S2, n - u IJ ��UU JIW 2 3 CITY OF MOUND PART I 1 I Case No. Date F i 1 Fee_ ____.__ _$200. 00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLANNING b ZONING C OMMISSION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subject Property '175 T Addition VpnJ - -- PID No. Owner's Name h k ,F"F L Day Phone Owner's Address A"oeim som Space �g Applicant's Name (if other than owner) EC S 3. E _ —� f— �__._------- -_..__ .____ _- -------__------ Address 8757 : SLA-6 Oew QR /� D Day Existing Use of Property:_ n zoning District,�'l' Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use Permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? _yes_ no If yes, list date (s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number (s) No (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) 1 certify that ail of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. �I ! App I i cant's Signature _�� _ / t Date 2 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: ✓ t Planning Commission Recommendation Date Council Action: O Resolution No. __- _— _. _ - ._ __.._._ [-M t e 5427 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page Two Case No. _- "1 I - 002 A. All information requested below, a site plan as described in Part 11. and a development schedule providing reasonabl guarantees for the completion of the construction must be provided before a hearing will be scheduled. B. Type of development for which a Conditional Use Permit is requested: 1. C o n d i t i o n a l Use (specify): V 2. Current Zoning and Designation in the future Land Use Plan for Mound: C. Development Schedule: 1. A development schedule shall be attached to this application Providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the pro- posed development. 2. Estimated cost of the project: D. Density (for residential developments only): 1. Number of structures:_____ 2. Dwelling units per structure: a. number per unit type: efficiency I bedroom__ 2 bedroom _ 3 bedroom 3. Lot area per dwelling unit: , 4. Total l area = _L� t _�hG'� fl (ex«. 9r 7 E. Effects of the Pr oposed Us List impacts the proposers use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. • s"A 8 PROP^SEa GAAAC G �R�v EwO� 3("'x &5, � v� Z Z t 0. v � J W V 3 SC ti Fb AcN Ir' � 5c L6 va.... o s.i _ I I 33 -- 11: VIA la I k MoviQ c� 8� ^ i 2 H • t q ►-ooz. • • • 630 � ou x 1 / 3- /0 Sj � •- 3(,)c 31 P asses -� 7q71 PL-4 3Y o O j q D ? 9 �j /� �ys.� 2d' •j� �o � - d..�$ vo Y f 1'0 30 7 0 & , r , S3 I CN ZONING REQUIREMENTS 9 t ADDRESS: 5 APPL ( CANT : T - cn Lgr � LOT: t BLK : _ ADDN : 3 4 ZO REQUIRED LOT AREA: 424 E X I S T I N G LOT AREA: It 13 1�1 i w le RE QUIRED SETBACKS ~ M FRONT: _ Q � _ • � 1 1r ( r n • SIDE: SIDE: REAR: 15 feet so L AKESHORE : 50 feet M X I ST I NG PROPOSED }SETBACKS FRONT: DE SIDE: e -y �. ! REAR: LAKE SHORE : (eyc �r BY: 22 i6D5 80 P. es to F" 4c .• RQ. T �6 s I 10 5 2 e (77� ,� DYER •1 '''r M p 9 9 T 6e 4 3 ISLAND VIEW OR city OP MOUND , %i< � 1'4 n v 0 0 0 Steven A. Banker MN State Director American Scholarship R R 2 Box 100 Rockford, MN 55373 January 18,1991 Mr. Edward Sheckel City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Sheckel, Foundation RE "_r FEE _, - I respectfully request a renewal permit to hold the weigh -in for our bass fishing tournament at the Mound Bay Park on June 16, 1991, beginning at approximately 3:00 pm. We would like to begin setting up our weigh -in equipment at 12:00 noon, and should be completed with the weigh -in and clean up by 6:00 pm. We will make every effort to make sure that the beach and park area are clean and litter -free when we leave the area. You can also be assured that we will do our best to accommodate other users of the park and we will always keep safety as our number one consideration. I have applied for the needed permits from the DNP, l.' IUD, Sheriff's Water Patrol and Hennepin County Parks, and these should be forthcoming. Please find enclosed a copy of our tournament rules for yr,ur further information. Please feel free to contact me at 477 -4821 if you nerd any further information concerning this permit. Sincerely, Steven A. Banker MN State Director American Scholarship Foundation 1533 v Y FRS' I 10t4 BOARD MEMBERS Da-CH Cochran Char Gree —ooa Altwil O Foster, V<e Chair Doephavnn Jan 130v�: Wl. Secretary M•nnetonka Reach John Lowman, Treasurer M nnelr noogI x E HatKOck Spring Park Tonka Flay James N Grathwol E.Celsvr JoEllon L Fturr Orono John G Matrrka YK.IorW Thorns Martinson Wayzata Robert N Pillsbury Minnetonka Robert Rascop Shorewood Thomas W Rouse Mound Robert E Siocom Woodland LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 EAST WAYZATA H0UkEYARD SUITE 160 WAYJATA. MINM SOIA SSNI TEtf AION( 6171471'Xqw EUGENE R. STROMMEN. E xF. CUT IVE DIRF.0 T (yl CC: PLANNING 2- FY-9 3 -11 PARKS 3 -14 -91 COUNCIL 3- �I-�T; r � February 14, 1991 t REC'r FEB 1 5 1991 Ed Shukle, Manager ✓ City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle: The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has received an application for a liquor license as described on the attached certificate. Uqder the statutes for issuing liquor licenses, LMCD author- ity does not extend to the charter boat when it is tied to the dock or shore. Therefore while the boat is docked, the boat would fall under the jurisdiction of the municipality. LMCD ordinances require that before a license can be issued, the affected applicant meet municipal zoning requirements. A zoning certificate is enclosed for your use. If the certificate, or a request for delay for reason, is not received from the city within 30 days, the District will continue its consideration of the application. Please execute the enclosed certificate and return it to this office so that prompt action can be taken on the application. Sincerely. LAKE MINNE10NKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Rachel Thibault Administrative Technician enc: certificate, application • 531 MUNICIPAL CERTIFICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE AUTHORIZED PORT OF CALL APPROVAL FOR 1991 (year) Under the terms of Lace Minnetonka Conservation District Ordinance #87 the following provision applies: 5.44. Subd. 2. No ports of call shall be authorized by the Board without first securing a certificate from the municipality within which such port of call lies stating that the activities to be conducted by the applicant at the port of call are in compliance with municipal zoning laws. Attached is a copy of the LMCD enabling act, 1986 Laws, Chapter 437, Section 6, with particular attention called to Subd. 4. Merritt Geyen Al & Alma' Supper Club, Inc., 5201 Piper Road, Mound Name and address of liquor license applicant Al & Alma's II, III, VI, X, XI, and XII is Name of charter boat Al & Alma's Supper Club, 520 Piper Road Location of authorized port of call I certify that the above liquor license applicant has met the zoning ordinance requirements of _ Mound J _ for the charter Municipality ' described for and is entitled to a lake Minnetonka Con- year servation District liquor license thereunder. Authorized signature Date is 2/91 Y35 4% .tea'• ai..l�.,; <., '1 it �r : c� l ,r t'•J t :r :,.• .. • l• {mot : 1 • � , � • , �� , y : ' it � t:. , � : :r;I,k J 1• .; �• �' :.1.,• 1 •... ��, ', 'reel .•�; t17•i, +� t, t t I �•: �,� .' 1;.' r �1 t +: p7 :r 'fit It'' 1�� Ch. 437 74th LEGISLATURE (c) Except as modified by this sectio the district has the powers conferred by chapter 340A on a statutory city of the third class havin a_ population of 10,000. a (d) The district may requlate bottle clu as defined In t chapter 340A in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as is piovided for cities in chapt 340A. (e) The district may not establish, own, or qp rate a municipal liquor store, either on -sale o r off -sa Subd. 4.• (JURISDICTION.) The distric ha_s_j_urisdiction over the sale and possession of any nonintoxicat mal liquor J or intoxicating liquor as defined In c hap ter 340A on or ove th waters of the lake. Licenses granted by the _d_l s tr_i ct must authorize the on -sale of intoxicating li noninto A ll n16 liquor or wine, or the approval of bottle club licen3es i ssued by the commissioner of public safety on on boats or watercraf4, which are under wad or m oored or anchored offshore and marmot . authorize the on -sale of i ntoxicating liquor, nonintoxicating malt li uq or oc r+ine, o r the operation of a bottle rlub on boats or watercraft while attached to land _or_to docks, _which on _sale or operation of bottle c m ay be authorized only by l icen se granted by the municipality h avinq Jurisdiction over the land t which the boat or dock Is attached. The distrlrt may_, however, lmoose further regulations or restrictions_ on any Sale or possession of intoxica nonintoxicatir� malt liquor or wine, or t operation of a bottle club on or over the water of the lake. Sec. 7. (POPE COUNTY; SEASONAL ON - SALE LICENSE. I addition to anY other licenses authorized by the* ccunty b oard of Pop co_un y)s ty_masue cane seasonal on -sale un��r�4QrinD and et,ikeowle are alt gI,own lrr enrolled art 18 r JUN 1' 90 ;.. '� 1 J L.M.0 1 � ~ .�hIJS,�. 4 S:It �:f,, a ,., �� 1t 1 1 4� � 1• _�� 1986 REGULAR SESSION ' Cit. 437 • • the licensed premises only The city council shall fix the fee for the license All provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter_ 340A, governing intoxicating liquor are applicable to the license except those which by their nature are Inapplicable. S (LAKE MINNETONKA LIQUOR LICENSES.) Subdivision 1. )DEFINITIONS.) (a) For the purposes o f this section, except where the context requires otherwis th terms defined In this section have the meanings given them. b •Olstrlct" means the Gake Minnetonka conservation district • a ublic cor oration and political subdivision of the stat created pursuant to Laws 1961, chapter 90 1, as ame by Laws 1969, chanter 111. ic) "Lake m eans Lake Minnetonka, Hen and Carv counties, Minnesota. Subd. 2_ IPOwERS•) The distri is deemed a munic . within the meaning o[ the liquor act, Minnesota Statute chapter 3 40A, and, subject to limita In this sec tion, has, on the lake. all powers conferred on munlclpalities by chapter 340A. Sub___ _3_. (LIQUOR LICENSES.) Th pow of the dist under t he liquor act are sub ect to the followinQ,__condltI and limitations: L Oj ly i ntoxicating on licenses, nonint malt 1i uor on -sale licenses, and w ine o -sale l icenses as defined in c h�ter 340A may be Issu b the distric Lb No more than 11 on -sale lntox lice e d in m ay be i95� Ued by the district exclu9lve of licenses descri Minnesota Statutes, section 3 sub 4. �n_d4S3S4riny and i4 are at tfjown In tnrolled act l Mm t g ew, 1&—• 11 ��1SvNE T� �V u �U �... ; �A�7 010 WARD MEMBERS Oav-o ti Cochran Char Grocnwood A&en O Fete.. Vice Chan oeaphaven Jan noywmkol_ Socretary M-nVWtt)nka Reach :ohn Lerman, Yreasuror k Co,IDtas E nat.ock Sprr,p Park Marva awho Tonki n,T, James N Grathwol E ■calwoe JoEaon L Huff orehe Jahn G Ma4nka vuona Thomas Manrrson Wayzata Robort K Prssbury L%meronka Robort Rascop Shorewood nmw" W Room Mound Robert E Slocum Wood4vid LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 900 FAST WAYZATA BOULE VARO. SLATE IW WAYZATA. MINNI SOYA 55NI TELIPAW.. 612101 February 8, 1991 E R. STROMMEN. U*CUTWE DIRECT* RECD FEB 111991 City of Mound c/o Edward Schuckle Mgr 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 CC: PARK COMMISSION 2 -14 PLANNI COI�L CITY CCJNCIL 3 --12 Dear Ed, The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District has received an application for a Multiple Dock and Mooring Area license as described on the attached certificate. It is the policy of the LMCD that all dock license applications be referred to the appropriate city for review, and that a certificate indicating compliance with local regulations be received from the city before final action of the District on the application. If a certificate, or a request for delay of certificate issuance for any reason, is not received from the city within 45 days of this mailed notice, the District will proceed with consideration of the application. Please execute the enclosed certificate and return it to this office so that prompt action may be taken on the application. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Rachel Thibault Administrative Technician RT:jlm enc Minnetonka Boat Rental of Minnetonka • 5302 MUNICIPAL CERTIFICATION FOR DOCK LICENSE APPROVAL FOR 1991 Section 1.06,Subd.11 of Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (L.ICD) Code provides: Compliance with other laws. The issuance of a license or permit by the district does not relieve any person fron the responsibility of obtaining required licenses, permits or other permission from any federal, state, municipal, county or other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the Lake. LMCD hereby advises its member municipality that the following person/ firm /organization hag applied for a new /renewal license for multiple dock and mooring area: Boat Rentalsof Minnetonka Inc. c/o Charles R Jones, P.0 Box 461 Name 6 address of applicant 4850 Edgewater Drive Location of docks 44 Slips and /or - 0= Moorings I certify that the above license applicant has met the zoning ordinance and any other city permit or license requirements of the City of Mound for the facility described for 1991. --- (Authorized Signature) (Date) • SaI STADIA LOCATION OF EXIST - 11 1 1G 1 - Mr. —ch.m.les Junes -$I- Subject to Order of 6-27-84 and BOAT RENTALS OF MINNFI'ONKA, INC. Board action of 1-23-91 superseding Board action of 4-22-87 and 10-28• 87. loD rE � � �o A G 17 13 15 SECTION 00030 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS City of Mound, Minnesota 1991 Seal Coat Program Seale'. bids will be receiCateri icy ened, rin e d rad aluild at the 'round City Hall at 11:00 AM., Frida pril 5, 199 for application of approximately 36,000 gallons of bituminous ,$00 tons of seal. coat ,,greg%tc. The bids will be considered by the City Council at their meeting Tuesday, April(q 1991 at i.30 P.M. All' pvoposals shall be addressed to: Fran Clark, City Clerk City of 'Hound 53 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 • And shall be securely sealed, shall be endorsed on the c?t :t :tii,ii witi: t•,. statement "Proposal for 1991 Seal Coat Program, City of an(i the Proposal Form included in the specification: 'or t1: pr jec't:. Copies of the plans, specifications and other prc>>posi,;i r ntr; r are on file with the City Clerk and at the offices ofC:;: :.� Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers and Surveyors, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447. Plans and specificaticns may be obtained at the office of the Engineer upon do 1,,•it amount of the deposit will be refunded to each bidder and has filed a bid with the Owner upon return of within ten (10) days after the bids are opened. Each bidder shall file with his bid a certified C;r . r:, ). :n ,,, r amount: not less than five (5) percent of the total �mnnt of thI- 1 i ,�, may b( withdrawn within sixty (60) dsys aft(-r the The City of Mound reserves the right to reject h ;ar :,ny informalitios or irregularities therein. CITY OF MoUvr), " Skip Jo },ns ;r;n, :171 - :5T: Fran Clark, City C ?,;irk END OF •tii `. ...•: iS1';,'a E :��•i' Fc,F': 8: .,., is S 0003(; - 1 sy! SECTION 000 t) ADVERTISEMENT FOk HID'; 19( LIFT STATION Mound, M i 1111c Sealed proposals will be received by thf c - , it 11:00 A.M. , at Lhe Mound City Hall, at which and read aloud, for the furnishing of all labor a;id necessary for the 1991 Lift Station Improvement The work includes redoing five dry well lift. it pumps in a dry condition, including new submorsit. interior piping, minor exterior piping and all therewith. The bids will be considered by the City April 9, 1991. at 7:30 P.M. All proposals shall be addressed to: Ms. Fran Clark, City Clerk City of Mound 53 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 5536 And shall be securely sealed and endorsed on the "1991 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT" and shalll included in the plans and specifications for t,h, pr Copies of the Plans and specifications —� documents are on file at the office of McCombs 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota for c3e in preparing bids may be obtained at the of'!'; payment of $25-00 per set, which is NON- REFUND.ti H LE . plans and sections of the specifications may be dol la-s ($4.00) per sheet of plans and twenty -five specifications, WHICH IS NON-REFUNDABLE. La-h bid(l shall file with his bid •i bid bond in an aui;ount of" not les's than fi%— the bid. No bid bij W:thdi-"iwrl wit"'in ; opeTiod. Th� C i the right to i- i t i e s t hc� rei 74 0 For March 12, 1991 Council m M arch 6, 1991 Our Lady of the Lake School requests the following p for Muato 'ar ( I Nite April 13, 1991 held at Our ()i t En Lake School. Approval ('011t illgL'Ilt 111)(41 A', j rt quired forms, insurance etc. I)OiTIV, milled in. jqmp�4 On- S, I e Non - I n t ox i c a t i n 'L-, j t, !, i Tuo r I'L r"Ti i t • City of Mound Police Reserves r ...... equests the f011 OWin,., i t'I'TT: or it 65' Dance held at the Pond Arena Ap r i I Please waive the fee on t of tht-Ti i,I Approval contingent upon n i l ru i t (I f k)rT insurance, police off !I'('T_ in V tJ'TId;1!WL', being taken care of. Te�!r! !prary On-Sale Non - Intoxicating - Malt L(p Per::;it Public Dance Permit --- PLEASE WAIVE Till." HAP Set -Up Permit --- PLTHE: I- ASF WAIVE TH I.T I- _ E S5 Y3 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. i Ao N March I --) , I �#, 1 M i , - Echai'd J. S I wk I e , J r . , C i t e Mrtn I-t i,-(-v RED City of mound 501 maywuod Rc)[4d Mound, Minnesota •536 SUP,JF;C'T: City of Mound, Minnesota City Half Addition and Remodeling NIFRA #88 8 Deny Flwlwied are three of 10-d-v- k a bviet SIIIII[Ill•y of Change Oi No. iti'w I� - for I'Loolli 106. Tho" custl i 1•11( City' Police P()()!ll 107) Thl 2 coo f I- j x T I t • S44 Tiv. wood tViIII CIVOLllid tiv,° as it w"19 felt this w "ls Credited $ for this dk'l(•t ;:l I toin 2 and Folding door- 30713 was vc 1 door wits not a cl VI_ for thlr; di -1, Tlw total credit for Chang g e ( N). 5 01-d"I. No. 6f, I I (am A - 'I he C i t y Pol Ch i (,I I' j iti'w I� - for I'Loolli 106. Tho" custl i 1•11( City' Police P()()!ll 107) Thl 2 coo f I- j x T I t • S44 • 545 I k I Pai-o Two I add i t ional roull! "Irldt'l. t 11" I toll 6 'it U %(Id"(i % l 4 •il 1 od d ill t r t he i- )r; ,, ro le c t I tem The City Polico Ch reque-,'t 10 and 106. fhe cost for t,ht-sf: 1 t -!11 A dr cl oser, mo! )n t w i i g thOM 111()1V The total cost for Chang(: Order Nu. (-,G is �, )2 sh i r1gobee s overhead and Pro fit. We hav(! review(Qd 01;'S( Change ordi: vs arld :P (111(23 t i 011S 01' I)PiL'd ld',j i i I in I • 545 SIIIN(NOIik;E IIUII,llF,IZS INC. (General Contractor) CHANGE ORDER With Owner Date: Febt 1991 • ro:, cl t)Lof Pb 5341 M a)wxA oad Pixmd MN 55364 The contract is amended as follows: cf mfr IS.Si1ED MR 'ItE FOU-0WING: 1) 1" x 1" wrod trim arotaxl lights on level 4. 2) Installation of door #3078 3) Enclosure around Doar #307B New Project Costs: ($ 91vo) Project Cost Adjustments Original Project Costs: Previous Change Orders #1 thru This Change O: der # 59 Shingobee Builders, Inc. 279 Notch Medina Street, P.O. Box 6 Loretto, NIN 55357 Phone #(612) 479 -1300 Fax #(612) 479 -3267 B y: -AaY��2- J / 4-�l (ijTa Veit, President) ($ l$ 225.(X)) Owner: City or P7 Fund 0341 - Kiy".7 ax,I_ Owner Approved: Date: Architect: 1 `,[.)`i) 2 1 t d Ave . N. Architect Approved;, Change order No.: 59 Project: ri; Cisy ► !�_. - - -- A d d i t i o n and Row(h,1 inig Project No (kx Add! Deduct )M r Deduct • • I] S4L SIIINU0131 E 13UII,1 E'RS INC. (General Contractor) CHANGE ORDER Willi Owner Date: February 199 'To: City of Wsund 5341 lliywood Road _ Mound M 55364 Chang(- order No : V. , Project: HKInl City It-All Rcllit un � fLrrxLl ing _ Project No: - ()(x)8 _ The contract is amended as follows: A. Add keyed light switch to holding room 5.ixl B. Add new 2 x 4 fluorescent troffer to Roan 105 $ 114.iKl C. Caret base installed on air exchange units (256 L.F.) D. Carpet base stock not installed (70 L.F.) E. Add'1 reinforcement in footings tX� F. Two add' 1 mini b inds C. Rework dowrtspout. 9 South side of building - due to City .adding law irrigation control in line with the dctimspout $ 1`().(x) ti. Provide and install thumb turns on Dk)ors 104A & I $ 11'..011 I. Provide and install cloker (- 107A $ 11�.ix1 J. Provide and install carpet base for each side of stair nsls $ °M,l) Project Cost Ardjustinents shil o & i' Original Project Costs: Previous Change Orders #1 thru Add I De-1,ct This Change Order # Add YX1,x?i $ New Project Costs: $ Shingobee Builders, Inc. Owner: _ c:i r y i,t 279 North Medina Street, P.O. Box 6 5 V 1 Loretto, MN 55357 W4 Ind MN Phone #(012) 479 -1300 Owner Approved: Fax #(612) 479 -3267 Date: r (Gae Veit, President) Architect: ti r,rq , r:ir1: 15crt; 23rd N Architect Appro%cd fate sq7 c M cCo m bs Frank Roo Associates, I nc. '5050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth. M nnasota 55447 To e;:� one — Enq nears 6'1 a Planners 6 4 -9532 FAX sur.e March 12, 1991 Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota City Hall Addition and Remodeling MFRA, #8878 Dear Ed: Enclosed are three (3) copies of Change Order 64. This change order is for extra costs incurred by the Contractor for changes In carpet color in one area and change in wall base materials. These changes came as a result of miscommunication between the City and the Contractor. The total amount of this Change Order is $1,040.00. We have reviewed this change order and recommend approval. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Sincerely, MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. Steven W. Jantzen, SJ:aju Enclosures �J Ar Ea�d' �GCa >!u�tyEmpcyer BILLS-- - - - - -- -MARCH 12, 1991 • BATCH 1023 64,710.65 BATCH 1024 1 51,807.46 Unitog Rental Feb uniform rent 686.07 TOTAL BILLS 223,204.18 • • Syg u 15041 PAGE 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL IAIE 2/28/9! W- CO2 -01 CITT OF MOM TIME 10.26.56 VENDOR INVOICE pk MID PREPAID CHECK NO. INVOICE NIN DATE DATE STATUS MW DESCRIPTION ACC11lJNT NLKi R AMOINT L)#CK 1 BATE 2/28!91 2/28/91 297.35 JtK -CD :?7. 31418 2;.1/91 GR" HEALTH PLAN VENDOR TOTAL 297.35 W145 PRF•PAID 288.46 OED 2/16 PR 2/28/91 2/28/91 288.46 JUl -CD 1 W 46 31410 2721/91 HfNN CO Sl"T 6 LAA ECT+ VENDOR TOTAL n.46 I2301 PREPAID 540.44 IC10 457 2/16 PR 01 -2040 000 2/28/91 2/28/91 54034 J7I -CD 1010 540.44 31412 2/21/91 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 VENDOR TOTAL 540.44 12304 PW -PAID 103.87 ICMA 401 2/16 PR O1 040 600 2/28/91 2/28/91 103.87 Jift-CD 1010 103,81 3 2 ICMA RETIREMENT IPJST-401 VENDOR TOTAL 103.87 12370 PRE -PAID 55.00 ICPlA Mll#*ST MTG 01.1190 -0000 21' /91 2/8/91 %.00 Jiff -CD 1010 55.00 31441 2; ?•�; 91 INTERNATL CITY M1i1TT ASSN VENDOR TOTAL 55.00 •!2519 PRE -PAID 859.70 LIQ 71 95F.69 MINE 71-11004520 26.77- DISC 71 71:a 9 560 2/28/91 2/28191 1,791.62 J W -CD 1010 1791.62 31432 2/26191 JIM151JN 8fa15 L1910 CO VENDOR TOTAL 1791.62 J2580 PREPAID 194.56 WgGS 71-71O0-:2{io 2/28/91 2/28/91 194.56 J;H_-CD 1010 1 4.56 31436 2/26'91 JLH4S011 PAPER CWANT VENDOR TOTAL 194.56 K3051 PREPAID 10,835.56 FIT 2/16 PR 01.2046 - 0000 2/28, 2/28/91 10,835.56 Jd1 1010 135. 31407 2/21/91 14ARlAJFT BE KW - ?QND VENDOR TOTAL 10835.56 !43090 PREPAID 1,441.64 MFR iifi>p 2/16 PR 01- 2040 - CXOOo 21N191 2/28/91 1,441.64 J;N --CD 1010 1441.64 31419 2!,11/91 MED CENTER HEALTH PLAN VENDOR TOTAL 1441.64 M3250 F%-PAID 494.73 JAM GAS 01-4K: -3720 Y? 10 JI,N GAS 01 -4340 -3720 356.60 JAM GAS 01-4:'JiJ-3720 202.62 JAN WS 73- 7300 -3720 251.24 JAN CASS 78- 7800-3720 128.44 JAN CRS 71-7100-3120 606.16 JAN GAS "!.;.4170 - ?720 218191 2/28/91 2,761.89 Fits_ C 1010 27f l.?? 3146 2/70191 MI NNE GASCO VENDIIR TOTAL 2761.39 u 15041 PAGE 3 PURCHASE JOURNAL AP-001-01 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOIfX NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMXNT LE%RIPTION M3268 PRE -PAID 212.38 2/28/91 2/28/91 MN 83U IT ASSN VENDOR TOTAL PM70 PRE -PAID P3950 2/28/91 2/28/91 MN PDIIUTION 131NTROL A%X VENDOR TOTAL K1401 PRE -PAID VENDOR TOTAL 2/78/91 2/28/91 MN RETIREMENT SYSTEM VENOM TOTAL "20 PW -PAID 87.11 2/28/91 2/28/91 NOW POSTMASTER VENDOR TOTAL M3631 PRE -PAID 174.25 2/28/91 2/28/91 IUTIIAV BENEFIT LIFE VENDOR TOTAL N:t800 PRE -PAID 2/28/91 2/28/91 PRE -PAID 212.38 2/28/91 2/28/91 212.38 PRE-PAID 212.38 2/28191 2128/91 M1RIHIFN STAIES Pf)FR CO 'A.N" TOTAL P3950 PRE -PAID 60.00 2/28/91 2/28/91 P E R A VENDOR TOTAL P3952 P14.-PAID 212.38 FEB MBA INS 2/16 PR 212.38 JK-CD 212.38 60.00 REGISTR -MTR SCH n - HARDINA 60.00 Jill -CD 60.00 654.00 DEF COMP 2/16 PR 654.00 JRNL -CD 654.00 87.11 POSTG FOR MATER BILLS 87.13 POSTG FOR MATER BILLS 174.25 JRN. -CD 174.25 583.61 MAR LTD 2/16 PR 583.61 JRML -CD 583.61 432.78 JAN ELECTRICITY 56.04 JAN ELECTRICITY 6.61 JAN ELECTRICITY 1,965.82 JAN ELECTRICITY 590.07 JAN ELECTRICITY 3,103.53 JRNL -CD 75.26 JAN ELECTRICITY 664.06 JAN ELECTRICITY 352.05 JAN ELECTRICITY 253.31 JAMS ELECTRICITY 674.21 JAN ELECTRICITY 871.43 JAN ELECTRICITY 2,890.32 Jd4L -CD 36.67 JAN ELEC-OEPOT 36.67 JRNL -CD 6030.52 6,651.29 PERA 2/;6 PR 6,651.29 JRNL-CD 6651.29 16.00 PETTY CASH-MTGS 5.00 PETTY CASH-GASOLINE 10.00 PETTY CASH - MEDICAL COPAY 34.79 PETTY CASH DATE 2/28/91 TIME 10.26.56 PREPAID CHECK AlLUXT NIMBER 440LNT DECK I DATE :71G 212.38 31422 2/21191 81x -4110 1010 60.00 31427 2/25/91 01.2040-0000 1010 654.00 31414 2/21/91 73 -3210 78 1800-3710 1010 174.25 31425 2/22/91 01-2040-0000 1010 583.61 31421 2/21/91 01 -4280 -3710 01- 4340-3710 22- 4170 -3710 73 -7300 -3710 78-7800 -3710 1010 3103.53 31405 2/20/91 01-4340 -3710 01.4320 -3710 71- 7100 -371C 22-4170-3710 73-7300 -3710 78 7800 -3710 1010 2890.32 31428 2/25/91 01-4340-3710 1010 36.67 31430 2/2S/91 01- 2040 -0000 1010 6651.29 31409 2/21/91 01-4140 -4120 01 -4140 -2210 01-4140 -3140 01-4140.2200 • • � _7 550 SS-/ PAGE 4 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 1/. AP- CO2-01 CITY OF MOUND IIME 10.26.56 VPNDOR I NVO 1 CE DIE HOLD M PA t D CHE CK NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS MOT DESCRIPTION AO.'aNT NLM14F W ro ()4;7 t DATE 2/28/91 2/28/91 65.79 JRK -CD 31476 2/ 2,/91 PREPAID 15.00 PETTY CASH - REPAIR MAIL BOY 50.00 PETTY CASH•MCKINIEY 8.50 PETTY CASH - CHAMBER MTG 1.58 PETTY CA9:- POS(AGE 1.57 PETTY CASH- POSTAGE 2/28/91 2/28/91 76.65 YX -CD 1(��10 b. r.5 31437 :i F'91 PETTY CASH YEW TOTAL 142.44 P1029 PREPAID 20.00 SAVE LAKE BM kT-JES%N C!i 4 4!;'0 2128/91 2/28/91 20.00 JRtI-CD 1010 N-00 314 PHTILIS .1}':IN VENDIF TOTAL 20.00 P4030 PREPAID 9,206.00 MAR PHP Ll16 PR 01- 1040 -(000 340.00 MAR Pff RETIREE 01-4140 1510 2128191 2/28/91 9,546.00 ,NIL -CD 1010 9546. _w) ?1417 PHYSICIAW IF MN VENDOR TOTAL 9546.00 P4t05 PRE -PAID 389.00 BOOKCASE -POLICE 30 -6 NA) `koo 2/28191 2/28/91 389.00 JRlL-CD 1010 AN. 0'J 3!4"q 2' ? PRIX]ESS YOIIDWO KING COWA', '[NOOt TOTAL 389.00 94171 PRE -PAID 1,324.40 LIQ 71-7100 7`110 163.90 MINE 71-7100 -95:'0 28.31- DISC 71-7100-+`.6kl 17.95 MIX 71 -7100 9540 2/28/91 2/28/91 1,477.94 JRNL -CD 1010 1477.94 314A 2/26/ +1 QUALITY NINE i SPIRITS VE11DOt TOTAL 1477.94 R4.'00 PREPAID 5,148.00 LIQ LIAR 71-7100 -3610 2/28/91 2/28/91 5,148.00 JR L-CD 1010 514P.70 ' +14f,, R 1- YO16OIYL L ASSOCIATES VMIf;R TOTAL 5148.M 54511 M -PAID 508.92 CR UNION 2/16 PR 01 -ZO4X? 0a,q 2/28/91 2/29/91 508.92 J;X-CD 101G ; �.4: ;141F 2!71 +1 STATE CPPITOL L UNION VENDOR TOTAL 508.92 54630 M -PAID 11.89 JAN C -K 1I.1NE 01 -4, i 14.36 JAN 5c.q'1INE 01- 41`N?:'t °: 1, 090.76 JAN GA.` I I NE 01 4 i .':'; 0 7.19 SNONIWAS 01-4,' ,4t 54.56 JAN Gn I _ I NE r, l - 41' ,, «. 170.76 JAN GW�11NE O1 4X" ? 1 633.61 JAN GASU I NE 11.97 GL OVES 154.38 JAN GASa, I NE 13 •':�i :': 1, 458.01 JAN GASOL 1% 2/Z3/91 3,623.49 ,.IFQt -CD 1:10 r: >3,4; SS-/ PAGE PURCHASE JOURNAL ;►,!E :, ? W- CO2-01 CITT OF MOIND T111 10.It VENDOR INVOICE DIE FcLD M T'AILI Df I NO. MICE WM DATE DATE STATUS lM10LNT LESCRIPTION A(T:IIINT NMf4R AMNT 144 1 LATE SUPERAPERICA VENLTOR TOTAL 3673./4 II)T ALL VFNDIRS 64,110.65 552_ BATE 3/08/91 TIME. 9.31.58 I% PAID DECK A(XOUNI MlMAR AMUINT L3f(Y ! DATE 30-6000 4100 1010 01 N }40- :1.10 01-4090 -210( 01 4140-:100 01 41,))-l1-)0 01-4340-2100 Oi-1230-21C'0 T1.1(00 -21� }� 73-7300 -2100 78.71 00 ltd 01-4070-2100 22-4110 -.'100 01-4290 90 1010 59- 6(k)0-61:c 1010 01.4280 -4:74 1010 01-4320-2100 1010 01-4020-4120 1010 73- 7300-2'lk 78- 7i;(!, -"I"100 101(1 01 -4190 -7250 1010 01 -4280 -37`0 /,- �,) l/ 01- 4290 375) 2t- 41 '0-31`A S5,3 PAI,E I PURCHASE JOURNAL AP-0O2 -01 Lill OF WIND VEM1C)Ft I NVOI CE ltE m 0 NO. Will NIBR DATE DATE STATUS M AN1 DESCRIPIION A" 12.4: 2 NAI[ PATES 3108!91 3103/91 12.42 JRN -CD A i C SII'Nl *LNG VENO(R TOTAL 12.42 Ai..ym 131.57 FEB OFFICE SUM IES 1"Z.84 FEB OFFICE SUPf1.lES 263.10 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 130.53 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.46 FEB OFT ICE SUPPLIES 39.50 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 12.23 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 45.34 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 45.34 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 16.75 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 32.50 FEB OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.50 FEB OFFICE S1f - PLIES 3!08/ "l 3; ?°pal 957.75 J2W-CO AM- MN /MII44E.S1 BUSIN5S t VENDOR TOTAL 957.75 ,V) Im 176.25 00 '84-BOW FEES 3/08/91 3/08/91 176.25 JtNL-CO AMFRICAN NATDNII BAN( VENIl1R TOTAL 176.25 AO'300 200.00 DIELECTRIC TEST 3/08/91 3/06/91 200.00 M& -Co AMERICAN TEST CENTER VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 !10340 $09.05 XEROX PPi-'ER 3/08191 3/03191 409.05 JX-CD (mll -A. PARR VFN" TOTAL 409.(r) A0341 20.00 LMCD SAVE LAKE-MP:f6 3/08/91 3/03/91 20.00 JNL-CD FNIF!EA Mff'N5 VIM TOTAL 10.00 h0'40 6.65 FEB OXYGEN 1).(5 FEB O lt" 6.65 FEB OMEN 3 3/09191 19.95 M -co !t (Fi OWANT VENDOR TOTAL 19.95 Rltao 137.94 ORE 0.5E 3/N, 3/08191 137.94 JRN -CD 81(1 CLARt OIL CWANT VENUOR TOTAL 137.94 BruAO 44.52 FEB GAPBAGf- 1 FEB GAPBra -Pi 65.72 FEB C,fY+BA(E-F!RE BATE 3/08/91 TIME. 9.31.58 I% PAID DECK A(XOUNI MlMAR AMUINT L3f(Y ! DATE 30-6000 4100 1010 01 N }40- :1.10 01-4090 -210( 01 4140-:100 01 41,))-l1-)0 01-4340-2100 Oi-1230-21C'0 T1.1(00 -21� }� 73-7300 -2100 78.71 00 ltd 01-4070-2100 22-4110 -.'100 01-4290 90 1010 59- 6(k)0-61:c 1010 01.4280 -4:74 1010 01-4320-2100 1010 01-4020-4120 1010 73- 7300-2'lk 78- 7i;(!, -"I"100 101(1 01 -4190 -7250 1010 01 -4280 -37`0 /,- �,) l/ 01- 4290 375) 2t- 41 '0-31`A S5,3 PAGE 2 PURCHASE J0UPNAU 1NII 3 108 /`fl AP-M -OT CITY IF MIJND IIML 9.31.`,,8 , A)" [MICE ME HOLD Pfl -PAID DfCX NO. INNIICE NMBP. DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT OESLIRIPTION A[LIIINI MINER wim LIFO) 1 ow 3/08/91 3/08/91 214.12 JRNL -CD rin EI ACKONIAK W `,ON VENDOR TOTAL 214.12 008:0 2,16 86.39T SALT n .1- 42£1Ti 3 +0 3(08,91 2,269.48 JRNL-CD 1010 CARGILL SALT DIVISION VENDOR TOTAL 2269.48 1W, 25 26.17 AIR VALVE 01-4290 : 1 310 3/08/91 3/08/91 16.17 F -CU 1010 CAT J) PARIS 4RVICE VENDOR TOTAL 26.17 C01859 59.98 SEAT COVER 78 -7800 22" 3/08/91 3/08/91 59.98 ,RTL -CD 1010 Oi41PIOH AUTO VENDOR TOTAL 59.98 tm 28.59 MATER•LIQ 71- 7100.3740 3/08/91 3/08191 28.59 .RFD -CD 1010 CITY (IF MAlIm VENDOR TOTAL 28.59 00 46.56 FEB RUG RENT 7l 71(n 4.10 3/08/91 3/w/91 46.56 JRNI-CD 1010 CLEAN STEP RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 46.56 C0 4.57 FEB Hf4E SUPPLIES 01 4.:* 2300 4;.96 FEB HD* SUPPLIES 0 1 - 4 :fk - Z,( 2.60 FEB Hm S1PPL;ES 01- 4290-'XO 83.14 FEB KW SUPPLIES 01.4120 -2200 31.41 FEB HOW SEf4LIES 01-440 -M 82.88 FEB ME SUPPLIES 22.4170 -74V 21.87 FEB HE* SUPPLIES 73- 7300 - 00 3.39 FFB 461, SUPPLIES 78 -?" --3 0 7.56 LETTERS- NMSLRS O1 4140-:: , (!0 3/08/91 3/08/91 285.38 RW -0 1010 1)IAST TU la]AST VFNDI(Et VITAL 265.38 C0961 77.94 DiWIS 7 7.r 3/08/91 3/08/9t 77.94 JRL -CD 1010 COAST TO COAST VENDOR TOTAL 77.94 1,0970 165.65 FEB MIX 71- 7100- 9W 3/08/91 3/08/91 165.55 JOIL-CD 1010 WrA 171A BOTTL1W MInWST VENDOR TOTAL 165.65 1,0990 4,900.00 SUF'KIRT FEE-'91 01-401 ofi) 3/08/91 3/08/91 4,900.00 ,RN. -CD 10:0 Cft'PUTOS KI(I fif VEN[(R TOTAL 4000.00 ssy • • J �1 PAht 3 FUkLNA5E J0UkNA1 I TE 3/08/91 AP - 0O2 - 01 CITY if WIND I i MF: 9.31 5e ANDUR INVU111 DJE m f" PAID DfL7( NT. IW)IU NMBR !WL DATE STATUS WNI L>ESCHIP11TIN AI;t.T!<lN1 4r,4k FM1l1NT ovy 1 G)TE is ('1020 128. "C3 ST1N1(t-F lot. REPUR 3/00/91 3108/91 12d.303 JFN -CD COWtPT MIC31(OFII. M VENIXIFI TOTAL 128.38 x1090 4,2`4.00 YIct5 3108/ 3/08 /ql 4,254.00 YN, CD 1 0 1 AN114NTAI WHY F VENDOR 10fAt 4254.00 C1100 13.00 FEB COPIER VINT 3/08/91 3/08/91 13.00 JH CD Iri10 COPY (X,f'LICATINC, PPODUTS VEM). TOTAL 13.00 01:Y90 3,93c FI BEF3? 7l 110i! '+530 3/08/91 3/08/91 3,939.05 JR -CD 11 DAY OISCR(81JTIN3 CO VEN(m TOTAL 3919.05 01286 116.56 Wil11 RADIO SIRVCCE CONTRACT 01- 4"_80-39,) 56.28 MARCH RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 01- 4340-sIlo 12.06 FKa RADIO SEk110E CONTRACT 01-41J0-P5 12.06 MARCH RADIO ", .'ICE CONTRACT 0 1 - 4.1)0-- -T9v,� 76.38 MARCH PAD I(1 U P V I C E CtNTRAC:T 01 12.06 MARC31 RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 01 4r'- 40 - ?�`ti 60.30 MARCH RADIO SE RV I CE CONTRACT 73- 7300 - Sr ti 28.14 PWO RADIO SERVICE CONTRACT 78- 7; !, G 28.14 MARU1 RADIO URYICE CONTRACT , 417 -:rrG 1, 349.25 CABLE ,MALLPIATF.5 LAEOCA 30- 41 "X' 3/08/91 3/06,91 1,751.25 Jk -CD 019:11M ft MIW SOTA, INC. WNDOR TOTAL 1751.25 D1320 417.00 FEB ,0+'. Ef -:7C =fit T 2 "1' 41; 0 C ? 1 3108/91 31001 417.00 W - CD U( f'" D IftCE VENICIR TOTAL 417.0G' t1420 6, 232.:'!, FFB K R 't ,'; � �,� - 3/08/91 'r3 /?! 6,232.20 F AST Sl1F PFVEPfiGE ,"Lrif1R TOTAL 6232.10 E14, 6.00 MTG EXP ES 31.50 ►ifv CK E XP 01 4?a _, 4:1 31 3/08/91 37.50 ix -CD F011'WD i"Vf 'r'NDOIR TOTAL. 37.50 F1690 43.99 FiH MIX 71 54.31 FEB MISC 71 .1100 f.`A 98.39 im -CO Hip ST'W BAP 9f" Y VFN1ty !Wgc 9T3.30 J �1 PAi;E 4 P;.RCMASI J00kNAI ILIA 1E 5 /(ri'Q1 AP-0O2-01 CITY Of H1ND T11 , 9.31.519 %4 NOW I NV01lT Olt f[l 0 Gh1 PA 1 U CEf ly NO. INbUICF NMBR DATE AAIE STATUS ro J I EE..k1PIION AlT11)1f NIMfOR P41ANI O#C.Y t f0t F1711 310,9`1 TEB TRIGING 3! ltl /91 3/08/91 300. ,111 -1:0 FRA"s lkll )1N. ANI4R TOI ?00.9', F11'0 451.50 ARBIfkAf1104 C; 4.' ?, 4 3/08/ 3 /%"Ql 457.50 04 CD 1010 F Ft'a K1uIE N 6 6 N NI)OF 10 1 AL 4 9.50 F1726 :S.(1q pis FRE941TR FOUKIIN G1 4?40 41311 3/0R/91 3/0$,'91 25. (R) -F:wt CD 1010 WwTER Favi►'IA VE WIR TOTAL 21.00 li1747 262.50 PiCTIfES 30 60C�1�41V0 3/043/91 3/08/91 262.50 ,JF2}(, -CD 1010 G 6 8 m"If ItNS VENDIA TOTAL 262.50 61748 98.00 LAMINATE TIPS CLEW 30 76.00 LAMINATE TOPS -PAWS 3G 60(Y1 5001 3/08/91 3/08/91 174.00 At -CD 1010 G 6 S (ABINFTS, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 174.00 61840 18.88 WSE 3/08/91 3/08/91 18.88 JRN- -CD 1!110 GPAJINE PARTS (n VENOOR TOTAL 18.88 1;1870 258.33 FEB MAP9*1 Sa a3Y 2.' 4110 1' +l 10 3/08/91 3/08/91 ?58.33 •At-CD 1! I0 �IB,ti 0 taB 1 4 NT43R TOTAL 258.33 61`390 37.80 FF k WATER "I FP 0I 4S40 41`x1 :0.?0 FFR. MATER C111LER 01 4(NI r, 12.20 FFk WATER CJ)ILER 01 5.00 GEB WATF,R GTTIEP 71 !qj" 5.06 FER WiTER Cf"FR 1. "j fJf ` +1 3; tk? 100.90 ,TF74 CD 1; 101w(D 1NiFwlr VFN'tF TOfa. I CC. 9 9 'il'�O) IN .J1 MAIL Mk)fl f I EASE 4 i s `raj �e` +;' 3 /fx31 I1 ,1N71-CP ii1 "IIR i71NTT NA! RAN 1FNL4F 1oT,4 1<9.71 f,l'a 1Cfi.00 FIFD ST)fFiFTI iGi?LN `i 414 4;ii 105.00 .F71 CD (Xr7; �,iNi�[a fi�ifTS ANll:R TOTa- 1( + -(X� • • • 5% 5-1; 7 I S PUkCHA5E J0UkNAI WE 3 /T18 /yl W- C01 -01 CITT OF MIXND 11 It 9.31.58 ' I KID ICf: M HR .D Fed PAlD CHE CX N). INVIIIfY NPW DATE DATE STATUS AMTXNT (E- SL7t1P11T3N ALUXXlf 4f+14k AMIXNT M) 1 WE Hl'911 3/08/91 31 1`5.00 1`_5.00 1L11 [I% EDOE,BOLTS,NUTS , 1RN--CD 01 4 1 : "00 1014 H l L PISABI, INC. VENIIOR TOTAL 155.00 H' 140 297.67 JAN BOOKING FEE fit 4110 4,'oO 3/%P/ l 3/03/1 :'47.67 M }1TN t;0 4014S I>fPT VENDOR TOTAL 291.67 x.160 445.40 '91 TRAFFIC TIDETS 01 41411' 1;'(x) 4,219.00 JAN BTIAR 01 4110 4"-V^ 3/08/91 3/08 4,664.40 JM - 1010 4 w 10 1 t1314R VENDOR TOTAL 46f,4.44) J 480 3S.00 Q ASSES HEIMB-FACKLER 01-4340 -3140 3/ 3/08/01 35.00 " -CD 1010 ,1AP4 5 F AL1t1 Ek VENDOR TOTAL .3.5.00 fri10 125.50 FLASH TIN 01 42911; ♦` {S0 3/08/91 3/08/91 125.50 JR!1- CD ;!10 .)IM W IN `AFS CO VENDOR TOTAL. 125.50 11533 6.60 MILEAGE 71-7100 - 200 3/08/91 3/08/91 6.60 W- -CD 1010 (Fl rm" VENDOR TOTAL 6.60 rY)40 10.00 SHOTS-ENALD 01 -41440 '140 3/08/91 3/08/91 10.00 ,F11. -CD 1010 IIIN F MAI D III WNDOP TOTAL 10.00 lKle, 20.00 LK CO CHAPT Mf% 01-4;" % 41r3 3/0P)/ 3/09/91 20.00 .01 -CD 101n 1N %lf4 kt AND 'ANT(R TOTAL 2'0.00 1.'t 10 31.69 CLEAN SIM Z2 - 4 41• � r 22.38 NAPKI WS, PLA TES ,FOFY.S 01-41'):0 -": X) 1.67 SALT 1 /08/91 31fX3191 55.74 "--CD 1010 ti14II I 11131f) 'h-W TOTAI. 55.74 1; 121.95 TICKETS-IRESERW DANCE Gt 7XY) 01'71 311 6,1 3/08/91 121.95 JFK -CD 1010 t,'Pilh PI INTING 6 GF'.;PICS VENDOR TDIAL 121.95 1,578.73 IST GTR INSURANCE 01-4-;) 410 :'i l .81 1sT QTR INSFWU 01 -4040 ';0,10 6 1ST QTR INIMANCE 5-1; 7 PAI 6 PURCHASE JOURNAL lhlf AP CO2 CITT (F MIIND IIME 9.31.58 VENDOR I WO I (T It1E HOL D PF8 PAID Uf CY Nn. INWIIIT NMBR DATE DATE SIATUS AY7(LNT OET ;AIPT1(N AUJNI mrNR AMT (14.O' 4 DATF 1 1 : 1ST QIF IN5IFOVtl n1 4110 "4t.IC 4,144.17 IST QIR INSIWaT 4140 It I,; 52.62 151 QTR INSiR4a 4; 41 fIG 657.81 IST QTR INgFJHI G1 41 4,M.63 IST QTR IN511WG C, 4;�c+ 386,79 1ST QTR IN.SI.R VI 01 263.11 151 QIR INRFAN(T (1 4 +.;; 3;1(; 1,05'.49 NT QTR IPC NfNt 01 4<4 �,1. 3, &.7.89 IST QTR IWjVAN(T 4177 Y11i 1,447.17 IST QTR 1NDF(# 1 71K 'h1P 2 973.;5 IST QTR I NUANCE 2,973.'9 IST QTR INR.W41 3/08/91 3 /OF /91 115.00 JRN - -CD I h71tk OF MN 1 :111kS INS Tt VENDOR TOTAL 25115.(0 12380 20.0) UfIEFS MTG 01 4140 4120 3108/91 3/08/91 20.00 Ifm -CD 101( LER"ll NW I VENOW TOTAL 20. C0 IC3030 4,28242 FEB BEER 3/08/91 3/08191 4,2x!1.42 JRPi -CD MARL, VII OISTRIHITCR v4m VITAL 4282,4' M3130 12.25 NW MTG 01 4Cu10 41:x) 3/08/91 3/08191 1225 JRN - CD 141 METT40 AREA "T AS5N VENDOR TOTAL 1225 KWO 32,35?.A MAR '74:WFR SERViLE 7b ';7'i; 4.'C 7,7W 7- MAR S7<f#R SERVICE 78 11'711 ;rrr 3'48.17- MAR SEVER SERVICE 1w 1 ' ( "k 3/08/91 3/08, 24,. JFNI. -CD 191, N 1W MA`iTf UNIRf1 cilf+it 1 fWAL 24: M'x240 1!18.: AW6N. PAGER PE.' 1(18.0 C1dd cY PAGE R tfM 37.4 3 -4-5 PAGER RENT CI 414r)r�r; 3 /0P,'91 3 /(ie; al 315.34 JH -CD 1ri1 MINN Llm FUR VENIICR TOTAL :W. ?4 fC?310 20. (M) GAS CH.OR W SfiOF~ OUIE T 73 7 "s 4110 3 /,rd !'ai 3/08/ Q.U<1 of -co 1 ^1, MN P11 111T I N IJNTP11- N,TI(: VEI(DOR T014 20,,q M3470 N�,(�� hWER PESTS, .I /x:5!91 3/ 01'11 1G."r PNI CD MN V.Y TT 51lN !W -UATJ 1 4 NC4R IOTAt. 60.rk niw4 6,g76,h) 14 V,^W i • • • er g O'S PAIL 7 PURCHASE JOURNAL - LSIF 31Trdh'1 AP-CO2-01 CITY L)F" MMND 1114 4.31.5$ W?I" INVO1Cf RE RXD m PAN) CFf(v N), INVOR1 NMM DATE I1ATE STATUS ANOINT Lt S;Ck I P I I M ALC(INI N11E9R AMIXNI Off) I IK'+TF 3/06/41 3/08191 6,076.00 Mt - CD Mltt>ti`IA 1N YF.Ni1R TRIAL 60'6.00 M3490 4,61 f 11 SALARIES 1,167.0 FEB MAINT 617.50 FEB INILIS 3/ 0 1 F /';1 3iO8/91 6,401.50 ,F*-CD MN FIRE ItYARIWNT VENUM TOTAL 6471.`_) MiAA) 5,573.33 MAR FIRE RELIEF PEW10N 3!06'91 3/08/91 5,573.33 Mt tO1 MMND F 1,4 RELIEF 11,';N 1 15141% TOTAL T ?3.33 X10 70.00 REPAIR CDIi.ER 71 -7V0) 3/013/91 3/06/41 10.CKJ CD )UtU MR-A, RFFRII? RAT I(N VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 N+t;ay 155.00 MEMA NFtFA 01 4 ?4` 4::ti) 3/WPI 3;08/41 155.00 JPX -CD tC,iO Wit M IRFAT ION S PARK ASS V1:40M TOTAL 115.00 ►KOO) 430.11 FEB ELECTRICITY 01 4; ? b,?5.18 FEB ELECTRICITY rt 4 4 "i" 554.00 FEB EIFCIRICITY r t 4I, '!0 0 13,19 FEB EIECIRICITT 71 7:'a 243.36 FEB ELECTRICITY 4'; 41?' 1,654.10 FF8 ELECTRICITY 73 1,206.23 F:8 EIEC1R1C10 3 1T>F?/ 3/08/91 4,581.17 ,a' -tt-CD N401 —kS -STATES FIYAR CO VMT, TOTAL 4581.11 4 457JA Fit E T 1 ,PAi `519.b1 DNI iW L1 4 ^1 4, 3l! / 0 l ?'Ca3i4l 5,546.75 Mt"hiFN Flo. P, VENDtip T!)IAL 55 N:'4t) 69f.0 `.a- 'I ": `.;rJB`sM IG .i RNA 4!4:;I',1e1 NT Y SW,!O V N(f TRIAL 139610C AF 01". i!W1NT "oi1P T'ITAL 157 1> > P4'.)0 k 3.4 F'E5T f', ?1 7;'.; t; ^�♦ 30.071 Eft ,,D Pkk 8 PURCHASE J0URNAI ',;CIE - T /CRl /vl (1 • C'02 01 CITY OF M1m Lip* 9131.58 VEN" 1P4111CF Itt HEI0 I4ff PAID MY W. IWMI NMBR DATE DAIF STATUS PAINT DFSiiNIPrjON A1711N1 NIMOR PAINT f'?41) 11 DATE NtNWETT 'S, 114' VENlt1R TOTAL 30.00 Pow 2, ?W.10 FEB BEER 1 , 3;'08%91 3/08/91 2,:%.10 J* - co P1104 E43 ONIRIWfl 1 �13 �Wljk 1,11AL ""%.10 PWV 150.00 VINT AGMMT-W% TTPW r1 4,4 31C8 lYd,rgl 1 1f1t-CD F %I ISBN KV,1T" SrSIE,9 VEN t-P TOTAL I`_4.% x14109 1f '91 LAWN 5 TREE CAK-C HAIL 0 434`(1 -Q)'� 3,'081 3 /RS /41 135.30 JR -CD 1010 M) IAWINS ON 14 LAKE AS';) 'AP111;k fl)TAL 135.30 R41,419 3,6:0.00 ELEC WORY AT IP BLDG 01 4340 _3:0 3/08/91 3/08/91 3,650.00 JRh -CD 1ci0 R.C. ETFCTRIC, INC. VENI)L4t TOTAL 3&50.00 84209 104.67 FEB rARBAGEi -C HAIL 01 43'0 IN) 3/98/91 3/08/91 104.67 Jul -CD 1010 RANOVS 'i(Y41 fnlli]N 1 4N10 T()TAL 104.67 R4N) 200.00 FEB ASST CHIEF SAL.ART ;;'-41'0.1110 3/08/91 3/0�/9l 200.00 J dt -CD ; ( KM D MAf. kwf A)OIR TOTAL 200.00 84.9 12-1.00 FEB ILF 3/09/91 3/08/91 123.00 JRFI -CD 1011'+ RUN'S ifs o rtl , r O NDLR TOTAL 123.00 S44; + 1,105.00 13 REGISTR-STATF FIq 374V :`'' 411 -`3 41 :0 3,F;r?r91 3/M/ 1011.00 JRW -CD S1ll 1r4k ;;INN TFCNr;ry uN 'A`10P TOTAL 1105.00 ;441 ?` EMK EMS -MTR'JEIT "'x,'91 3(r)3 /' +I 95.W JRW -CD 4`11 ",1111 N1w 'yjKJf ITiTAL .()a 54477 2.00 REPAIR E8t11P 2t.00 JFM . -CD _. E1;1 1 ; 1 IN ti4N:t1P TOTAL ]4440 3.50 FEB CAR III T,� 3.59 FEB CAR Mn;7f-S 01-41'1 3 'i 10.`0 FEB CAR IWAStfS • • Stc -41 T'4t 9 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE �;J� /91 AP-0O2-01 Cl1T of MNJND VEWIUR I N O I (I D1E HUL D PFQ I'M 1}f cy NO. IWIPT NPW DATE DATE SIAM AM(XNT (>E%j;IIPTION PGAUiT NMAP, AMUNI OV) 1 IiATE 1 1 7-50 FIB CAN WINS 01 4140 s 1 r V(* 191 3/L13/91 140.00 J R CD SPRINIP PAFY CAR WA% VINICR TOTAL 140.00 '"4460 764.00 DRIV THIf110 RfSFF ".ESi 01 4i`_n 4112 ?IC�3 /v1 3'08/91 764.00 JFnI -CV ST CLIAID STATE I>! kTR' TT VTNP(1R TOTAL 16 4. 00 04549 15.00 CERT FIE ,' .� 41!0 3!I JoI 3,' 1/91 15.00 IM -CD 1;1; STATE IRER'lkR VENDT1t TOTAL 15.00 541.10 3139.68 TIRES 4 4j'� 38:0 01 1 3/06/91 3/08/91 : JRNL -CD 1010 9R WY4 TINE CD WNrV)R TOTAL O9.ti8 T4710 730.40 ROtlCWa 01 3/08/91 3/Ot3/91 230.4+) JRW-CD 1010 TEAM 1AldIVORr W MICA(S VEF1N TOTAL 230.40 T4116 50.50 TIIf HELP 73 ':xiW I3rX 3/08,111 3 59.50 fii -CD 1010 IT It" IN(ES TO (30 VENDOR TOTAL 59.50 147;30 13.70 LErA &u2 USE C! 41 �r!0 3/08/91 3/08/91 13.70 JM CD 1r�1; 'HE 1WR VE?OIR TOTAL 13.70 14 /35 ;,274.00 MC" SIATION -P11 s •.a�+ `: �n: 3/08/91 3/09/91 3,274.00 J X. CD 1010 TI# PIN 1 :10t'rWIFS �4NT1IH TOTAL 3214.00 14'!0 8,`I T.%) FEB BEER 3!Ck3i41 3 /0F 91 8,514.st0 ,171 -CD iH(?ft P';TRIKJTIW, CD VENDOR TOTAL 8`' f4') 31.04 PICTIKS 3;C+j91 310 /91 33.04 JFCt -CD THPI1 II oil If [01; S1OFf5 1 .4 i)Ft TOTAL 33.60 T4341 0.73 RALMON TRAP 4,4! 3/, l,!91 MC / x3.73 ,Fit - Cp '! 1 ITIVA1Hk ( IA TRAP M JENI(R TOTAL 0.7? i 49; (j 1: , i . . �ITi `��rliE TX1(1( T'liX •,; Y .,' �I ., -41 PALE 10 PURCHASE JOUFNAI DATE 3/08/91 AP _CO2 Ol CITY OF PUN TIME 9.31.58 VElNIf14 INVOICE [a nD PRE -PAID C14ECK N3. INVIMT NMBR TWEE DATE SIAM APUNT DESCRIPTION ACCT111LI MMFOR AMOUNT CFEIk i DATE 3/08/91 3/06/91 12,312.00 Mi. -CD 1010 TWIN CITY i;W.y,f DM CO VENDOR TOTAL. 12314 11,110 105.00 MCFOA COW REGISTR 01 4.4�-4110 3/08/91 3/08/01 105.00 .JRNL-CD ;,,10 U4IVER5111 OF M! VENDOR TOTAL 105100 I1'1322 19.50 BALING TWINE 71- , 1 ",C, ". 3/08/ 3/08/91 19.50 JRw -CD 1010 WACUNIA F*'M'LW Y 1 4K% TOTAL 19.50 15450 115.00 SNO REFLECTOR 01 4340-2310 3/06/91 3/08/ 115.00 Mt -CD 1010 WAf1ATA AUTO SERVIff VENDOR TOTAL 115.00 w'a 106.00 FEB GARBAGE - PARIS 01 4 ?AO- ? 3/08/91 3/08/91 106.00 ,oL-CD 1010 WEMIMA SANIIATION VENDOR TOTN 106.00 h5630 640.00 BFACFiM 73-T Xl -310'10 120.00 SiFff SIDE 78.7()X1 - "300 3108191 3/08/91 760.00 JKL -CD 1010 WIIVtR INC 4fI10CT1 TOTAL 160. ()) W5690 2,403.57 460.45T CONCRETE SAND 01 4. Fu yk 3/19/91 3/09/91 2,403.57 JhX.-CD 1010 WM M1FlIER $ SONS VENDOR TOTAL 2403.57 Wf 700 1, =;,0.00 MAW RETAINER 01 4110 ? 1 A 3/09/91 3/09/91 1,550.00 ,TRW -CD 10 ;0 MP,;f NFIh, I f ,ON VENI4JR TOTAL 1550.00 79.00 TONEP, 1 4'!; "i 7.'r• 55.61 FRINC -1012 91 4?:'( 1.10 TNT -1012 01 4?:'r' i 110 3; t 8/91 1/08, 135.77 PL-CD ; r, 1FROT (MICATMN VENIICR TOTAL 1-3.71 � 4 98.!5 MAX,FLOOP DRY 0; '!��3r' 3 /�Ii3 / 98.75 7R'rl CD 1�;0 �h 'S 14: 'AN!u TOTAL 98.75 7 °aTtn 3. CUTTING MS 01 ; ±111 3/0'•/91 3`9.98 Fm - -CD IGI) 1;F Q FR INI. IT; ". ;`9.93 • • • S z PAM it PURCHASE JOURNAL AP- CO2-01 CITY OF MIND YDIDOR INVOICE ME 11010 M1. INVOICE NMBR GATE DATE STARE AVANT [ESCRIPFION 0 16070 MICHAIL PALM 16111 ERRY GAPVAIS • • Hot 9.31.58 PRE. PAID C/fCK Af1jk l NA'1•.gk AVANT NO' II [WfF 1A 1 +' /C y SQ 190.00 FEB ASST MAP571FY1. SA[.AkY 3/08191 3/08/91 100.tq JR►1 -CD VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 1:5.00 CDINTEPTOP 3/06/91 3108/91 1?5.00 JRNL -CD VENDOR TOTAL 1:'5,00 TOTAL ALL VENIM 157 + 807. 4f, Hot 9.31.58 PRE. PAID C/fCK Af1jk l NA'1•.gk AVANT NO' II [WfF 1A 1 +' /C y SQ PAGE I PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 2/ 4 ,'W 1,02 -01 01TY OF ")ND TIME 10.26.56 VIVO INVUICE DE Hot PAE -PAID 11ECX NO. IM-41111 Ni9R nAIE DATE STATUS AMOUNT OFSMIPTION AL7'OI.NT Nlf%R AMOUNT MY, t DATE ANW PRE -PAID 1,479.84 SIMS FOP CITY FALL 30. 6(W-4100 2 ?r"S!91 1,479,A4 JFO& -CD 1010 1479.84 31424 2/21!91 . PRE -PAID 24.37 SIGN PLATES 30-1.0 21:''8/91 2 20.37 JRNL-CO 1010 20.37 31438 2126/91 A & C S19MVING VENDOR TOTAL 1`,00.21 9054` m - PAID 1,188.04 LIQ 71 X100 °`10 2/28!41 2/28/91 1,188.04 IRN4_-CD 1010 1188.04 31431 2/26/91 631LFi7Y 11MRATION VENT4)Ft TOTAL 11.44 CN38 PRE -PAID 9.98 CELLULAR ONE SERV 22-4170- 42.53 CELLULAR ONE SEW 01- 4140-3220 33.47 CELLULAR ONE SERV 73- 7300.3:20 2/_91 ; X3!41 85.98 JRNL -CD 1010 85.93 31443 2/28!91 CEILLA AP ONE VENDOR TOTAL 85.98 CRUET PRF PA10 3,865.00 CR UNION 2/16 PR 01-2040 -0000 2/28/91 2/28/91 3,865.00 JPNL -CD 1010 3365.00 31415 2/21/91 MY 1:I1NtT CK.011 UNION VFNDOR TOTAL 39!.5,00 CTY?99 PRE-PAID 233.40 MAR LIFE INS 2/16 PR 01 -2040 -0000 2/4_'A/91 211!91 233.40 .0t -CD 1010 233.40 31420 2/21191 (xrw CIAL LIFE INS CO VENDOR TOTAL 233.40 0 .1001 PRE -PAID 2,370.3! SIT 2/16 PR 01- 2040 -0000 2/29, 2/28/91 2,370.34 JRTL-CD 1010 2370.34 31408 2/21/91 0"Iti`ill*k OF 4 VVNI" TOTAL 237^.34 01108 PREPAID 42.00 CPAC ANAARDS41ARR EiLD,TRUAX 01-4140 -4120 2/28/91 2128191 42.00 -W-CD 1010 42.00 31441 2/28/91 M INE PREVENIVIN AINISORY4 VENLCA TOTAL 42.00 �11'> FRF PAID 748.45 MINE 71- 7100 -520 2/;8/91 2/28;91 748.45 ,I1NL-CD 1010 748.45 31433 2/26/91 t0 P11t11 tf k VEMwlt f0TAL 748.45 F17 ' m -PAID 120.00 SEMINAR- Sl1TFERI -M 01- 4190 -4110 :1.8/ 'G8/91 120.0x1 ,)RK -CD 1010 120.00 31423 2/21/91 FkANK1 IN !N'FRt40 l 1?671 ' VENDOR TOTAL 120,00 G1 �5 PtF FAiD 1,025.00 OFF CURD 1/16 PR 01.2640-TM :J fl / 21.8! 1,02;.00 JR L -CD 1010 1025.00 31413 2/21/41 44-AT Mit ! (hE Ac;aVaf VFNTC - E TOTAL 10,500 61911 M PAID 297.35 MAR FOP 2/16 PR 01- 2040-0000 3 / y o - 3 7 y y3 5'by i Mc Combs F rank Roos Assoc In c. iSCSG i3!0 Avg ^�•'tio,tr P �T.�, ::'S .5 »4' - __...�,..,..__ _..:._ 4 March 12, 19;1 Mr. Edward J. Shukle. Jr., City ?'enager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Roe' Mound, Minnesota 5536 SUBJECT: City of Mound. Minnesota 1991 Lift Station Improvements Change Order No. 1 MFRA +x8635 Dear Ed: Enclosed for your consideration and approval is Charge Order No. : relating to the subject project. The addition of 8480.00 is for additional costs incurred during construction of the bypass piping !st Lift Station P -1, ¢ecausc of a d©fective gate valve on the existing forcemain. The deduct of $195.00 is for stainless steel bolts furnished to the Contractor by Public Works. These two items result in a net addition to the contract of 8285.00. If you have any Questions or need additional information, please cc:,cnct u8. Very truly yours, McC FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC: Jmj Enclosures C: A , Ea4e 9 CHANCE ORDER No. • City of Mound, Minr:es , 1991 Lift Station I�prov�_ MFRA #8635 Additional cost incurred because of defective gate valve on forcemain ADD Credit for S.S. Bolts DE TOTAL FOR CHANCE ORDER NO. 1 ADD ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT S 90,000.00 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (ADD) S 285.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOU�`T S - 9 5. - 2 - 9 - 5 - 65 . • S bc.0 APPROVE: DATE: No hale�te ha iiical Inc . -= APPROVED: D cC�rank R .� .. ooe Associates ACCEPTED: City of Mound. Minnesota DATE:— - • ill :4—r [1 ir lw. McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. [*PF 150go o�44 March 11, 199-1 Mr. Edward J. Shukle. Jr., city Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City Of Mound, Minnesota 1990 Lift Station Improvements Payment Request No 3 MFRA # Dear Ed: Enclosed is Northwest chanical, Ins.'s Payment Request No. 3 for work completed through February 28, 1991 an the subject project. The azount of thjs payment request is S 34,0 We have reviewed this payment request, find It is in order and recorixend -ayment to the Contractor in the above amount. Very truly yours. MCCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, TN C. John Cameron JC: jrrJ Encl 0su • An Fq-,el Opportunity Emp;oyer PA1?T_NT ZtIJf - NO. 3 CITY Or mOUND, MINNESOTA 1990 LIFT S +"'ION 1MPROVEMENTS MFRA 18635 CONTRACTOR Northwest Mechanical, Inc. P.Q. Box 40 Lang Lake, Minnesota 55356 ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY 1. Lift Station P1 I 2. Lift Station E1 L.S. 3. Change Order No. 1 L.S. .. hereby certify that this estimate is true and ; nrrect. PECR'NhE K INC. U_ ,� By: �� Date: Al %4 ".. 1, (A INEER • McCombs F Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North P:.ymouth, Minnesota 55447 PREVIOUSLY COMPLETF-1 COMR-r-I D PRICE COMPLETED THIS PERI(X) 1 - 0 DATE TOTAL $ 42,000.00 62% 36X 98% $ 41,2 $ 48,000.00 61% $ 285.0(. 38% 99% $ 47,520.00 0% 5 5 100% 1(m $ 2 85.00 ' �2 $ 88, 965.00 Total Work Completed Through 02 -28-91 $ M,965.00 Less Retainage (2%) $ 1 779.35 Subtotal Less Previous Payment $ 52 554.f,Kf Amount of Payment Request No. 3 Approved and recommender{ r 7r p,; , ► .c in the amou *it cf $34,63'.7('. MCCOMBS FTbV4K RODS By: Date: C1.TY OF MOUND, MINW- ; TA Ry. MIJUNV Br LAM MOUND POLICE q �, ' )1 1, Mon It I y P t , • �;TA 1'1:; 1 t I F I h o 2 1 a Ild I 1 0 f ;J)(" r t y t i r t i T h t I d juv('rlile i ow v1"): it a n additir:�n,jj ()() t i"divicitial :; for a vori(-t y of vi Th (, r e W, I a du u v 4 1 f (.1 nrl ic ; , Ill I t i rc for W,11 a) I T h (, ( I ( - p 1 t 17,� , , 1 - 1 t in 1? IV C I I i 1 with i n ur i (�fll T h e r e w 26 m�-d i 4 1, n t s I I � 14 o ion 1 1. n Fe, 1) r u, i r y a i t i r. " f; Vti tic•i a t 0 I , J Is- MOUND POLICE DFI)ARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - FEBRUARY, 0 jNVVSTTCAT I ml The investigators worked on S cl February. Those ca�'-�s account, investigative time. Other caf;o!, stolen property, several the;'. property, fleeing a police of! i Cocaine, weapons, shoplifting, : tempted suicide, harassing commui,ii* i! checks, and credit card forgery "� 1 Fe b r u, r y . Formal complaints were issuo I February. Those cases involvod w, misdemeanor DWI Is, posse sion o! consumption. .Pe rsonne I z l, , , , ,t a f f inch The departmpnt used appruxkT ate ly time during the month of lyhiuo hours of comp-time and eirn l r5 There w( 97 hours of si(--k t i: i" days of vacation used. 1V. Training All police firearms in tech put ea off icers rece i vo 1 in-.-r February. A WA i nor I : nh officer thro a AN, that em I) !I, I " : 1; , , Othf r courses attended worn un tervi ow i nq s }: ] 11 5, onerg", 7y h,irrl 1 inq j u%/ i I PrK and f ie 1 d r�A. r j ot 0 1 teal of 13 (L of tr,.jinjn(j wr eft,,, 1. Off ic('r E""'ald and somc. lent at the annual Imb l i c Nifoly I. no r ,l is. The of f i rp rs miU i n i a n I re"p t e] u"; very W(�: I • POLICE DEPARTMENT M ' REPORT - FEBRUARY, 1991 V. Police Re The police reserves donated 421. majority of that time was inv.,' reserves. The reserves were o i gerprinting a group of Brownies. • 3 547 '549 I FE DI 01 f l NSE S C F 0t D 1— - - I REPi1KtEG Li N r Ot! N D FART . 1 -- CRIMES H o m i c i d e Criminal Sexual Cor Robber y 0 0 Aggravated Assautt 0 0 Burglary 2 Larct.+iy 18 1 Vehicle Theft 1 0 Arson 1 0 C TOTAL ?5 PART 11 CRIMES Child Abuse /Neglect 6 Forgery /NSF Checks 3 0 2 Criminal Dan to Property 2 0 0 weapons 1 0 1 Narcotics 3 0 0 LiqK)r Laws 4 0 0 DWI 9 0 0 Sirrple Assault 3 0 1 0 Dorriest ic Assault 4 0 1 Doiw tic (No Assault) 4 Harassment 3 Juvenile St.tus. Offer2ses 4 0 Public Peace 0 0 I r esin3ss i nq 0 0 Ej A t I Other C, i fents es 2 0 0 TOTAL DART III &FAR IV Pr ty !!Iarrge AL ( 10Y?f1' % 6 Pvi Injury Ack 2 Fatal Ac i der ' s 0 M,di( its Animal C,irrptair?s GS Mutual Aid Other Gert Investigatinns 452 TOTAL Heri, Canty Child Prjte(,ti, cHli's TOTAL 6,?7 '549 I • I— L-1 • MOUND POLICE DEPARTIMFt CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT FEBRUARY, 1991 TH IS GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMAK"Y MON'T'H ("it r r i! W,i: [,;I F< A, i t 0 A t F(� o ii Art I A I I ! M I � I i N1 1 t Mir Juvr le Felf)lly J 11 1v n i 1(. fart. F Cif f Plrt II 0 f f rl "; f Mi iif I Animm ComFilriint:s 45 W 1 r Publ i Cc;fit w T ;,' ! A A M 1 A i t I G v Y 1 1 Ald 1-o' ,5.41 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT M( ,, FEBRUARY, 1991 0 CITATIONS Dw I MI - - o th-in .10 BAC Driving Pr ivory After or nq No P-L or Fxpir— f 1)1. on D1, J nq i ( p l V i ()I it i . It" e t o Y i c I d F(1 =1 1) :-If , 11 t Viol.lt l0rl:; t ho ( •I I i: To I A 1, MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT M ;t FEBRUARY, 1q91 WARNINGS I Nr) I n u i Tr if t ic F pi i pment. c r(r ;wa I k An i phi I T [)(, r I i ct P"ut Seat Belt `hr pspansinch 1 ,1 1 i , - t- I la nonus TOTAL 40 4 ARRESTS Misdemeanor Warrants 22 • '521 MOUND FIRE b1PAk1HFNT MONIHLY F'N. 6 MAR 91 INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE OE6ARTMENI PA;E 1 E N F O R PR;�ERIY - SfOIEN /RiClJ4iREO 01/26/91 1HP'..1 0212 191 �n X PROP INCIDENT SEG TYPE WE STOLEN DATE ± DE Sc NUMBER NO NO STOLEN VALL REC(1�f 1, A,:' 91000075 1 1 0 S4,of. ".0 02125;91 91000128 1 1 01/28/91 5400 c 91000161 1 1 02/05/91 518,000 02112;91 :ry 91000218 1 2 02/25/91 5150 91000151 1 5 021;"21'11 5119 91Di`0248 1 1 02/17/91 5425 t, M 910010182 1 1 02/07/91 $5 02/07/91 S ": 910(10261 1 1 02/ZS/91 S1 02/23191 S1 91;!00151 1 1 02/02/91 $1,200 TES 91000256 1 1 02122191 531J0 91 0278 1 1 02/25/91 51,350 E:v 91000 15 1 1 3 02/02/91 51,200 910;10151 1 2 02/('2/91 S414 91000151 1 4 02/';2/91 5819 ^A::? 91000208 1 1 02/03/91 $20 -:: 91000277 1 2 02/!5/91 $130 .., 91000278 1 4 02/2""'91 5160 Ew✓ 91000121 1 1 01/27/91 43, ^ 01/28/91 1 .' 91000208 1 2 02/03/91 510 91000217 1 1 02/03/91 S95 sue' iGV 910;00234 1 1 02/08/91 $50 0,v ;Ni)�MO 91000122 1 1 01127191 53,000 91000129 1 1 01/28/91 $15 91000225 1 1 02/14/91 $350 02114/91 S', . �v r 91000226 1 1 02/14/91 $1,941 ii T 91000278 1 3 02/25/91 5600 A.: JrR 91000151 1 6 02/02/91 $59 A— SIR 91000160 1 1 02105191 $20 A.. 91000246 1 1 02118191 $15 A . C'R 91000261 1 2 02/23/91 515 02/23r ;1 515 TC'ALS: 531,973 S � 0?1 H 91 Ik'SIAI I AT ION NAME W.X:ND P01 !'I. DEPARTMENT PAGE -', ,MARY ISN'S ONLY' NO F N F 0 R S � ACT IVI IT CCXIES: Al CAI LS fOR SIRVIC" A t : T 1 1 1 y ANA, i S I S BY PATROL AREA 1 , - , ;41 I T H'ku o2/25/91 C. 5 ?'3 . . . . . . . . . PATROL AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . E Ac I I I I lq 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL N B 11 4 6 9 38 1 3 3 3A k) i P .lo 3 1 6 4 o N T I d A Q I I :4 or k ! S0 CPf, :A! K v A 1 UJN 1 M' .' /A! ;i'l I wj(' FD Vi 1; N All O T W P I WAF F ! !' N) ',t A bi 1 T 3 1 APK I N G,'A j T 1 2 2 A k 7 1 22 8 53 2 1 1 1 2 4 6 2 2 ti 2 3 2 1 C. 5 ?'3 R ti: 26 FEB 41 INSTALLATION NAME - MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 {:i C�,3 f • • f • f _,;MARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S ACTIVITY CODES: ALL CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 01/26/91 THRU 02/25/91 1 • '57Y • • • • - • • - • • - PATROL AREAS • . • • • • • - - . E ACTIVITY CESCRIPTiON 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 1 H/R PRCt'ERT,Y DAMAGE ACC. 1 1 2 COMPLAINTS 2 2 CA1 E 11ES 1 1 ^3 DOG AT LARGE 1 3 4 x',55 DOG L ICENSE 1 1 � ATTEMPTED SUICIDE 1 1 73) MEDICALS 3 6 2 3 3 17 n1731 DETOX-MEDICALS 1 1 1 2 5 732 CRISIS INT.-MEDICALS 1 1 2 100 INJURY 1 1 <0 MENTAL CASES 1 1 2 I' %A ^ :? ALL OTHER /UNCLASSIFIED 1 1 i ".",O1 DOMESTIC /NO ASSAULT 1 1 2 4 ;?02 PUBLIC ASSIST 1 1 ALL HCCP CASES 1 1 1 4 1 8 :;13 CHIPS 1 1 HANDGUN APPLICATION 1 1 1 3 . -3 PROWLER 1 1 .< UNWANTED GUEST 1 I ' WARRANTS 4 2 9 5 3 23 r;2 MUTUAL AiD /8100 5 1 6 3 MUTUAL A!D /6500 5 5 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER 2 2 1 • '57Y RL•t: n 26•FEB•9' INSTALLATION NAME HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 CF SOS •••••• PRIMARY ISN'S :NLYT NO E N F 0 R S ACTIVITY :x ES: ALL CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY AWL YSIS BY PATROL AREA 01/26/91 TMRU 02/25/91 ACT . . . . . . . . . . . PATROL AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . CCOE ACTIVi'w DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90 TCTAL 0; ?96 ML,7UA; A!D /NARCOTICS 1 1 A5351 ASIT ` :NFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS•ADLT•FAM 1 1 2 A5352 ASIT 5 ATTEMPTS HRM-!:ANDS•AULT-ACO 1 A5354 ASLI 5-:NFLICTS ATTEMPTS MRM-MANDS-CMLD•FAM 1 1 1 2 5 A53SS ASLT S :NFLICTS ATTEMPTS MRM - MANUS -CHLD -ACO 2 2 83334 BURG 3-;NOCC RES FRC-D-UNK WEG? -COM THEFT 1 1 B4760 BURG 4-;NOCC NRES FRC-N•UNK WEAP -UMK ACT 1 D8500 DRUGS-SPALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA - POSSESSION 2 E4700 ESC-GM-FLEE AN OFFICER i 1 F1121 ARSON 1- INHAS -NO WEA-OT RESID-$20000 MORE 1 ? lo w CRIM A AST 'AM-MS NEGLECT Of A C41LD 1 J2500 TRAFFIC GM -DRIVE UNDER iNFLUENCE Of LIQUOR 2 1 3 J2700 TRAF AC.:D VIOLATION 1 1 J3i00 TRAF- AC.!D -MS -DRIVE UNDER INFLU14CE Of L1000R 2 1 1 Si701 JUVEs::: ALCOHOL OFFENDER 1 M?103 JUVFNI.E HABITUAL TRUANT 2 l M.199 LIOUOQ GiHER 1 2 3 W350 RUNAW 1 1 2 M1>01 DRUG :A %APMFRNALIA- POSSESSION 1 ? N"1190 DISTU.5 ;EACE-MG-MARRASSING COMMUMICATIONS 2 1 x;110 PROF' CArA,E MSJ R1VATE-UNK IN ENT 1 1 '� W THEF1 LVL VAL-FRM OTHER- SFRVICES 1 1;21 THEFT S25112500 -FE FRM BUILDING MONEY 1 1 5 75' R'..: 26-FES-91 C P' 'MARY ISN'S ONLY? NO ACTIVITY CODES: ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT E N F 0 R S CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 01/26/91 TkRU 02/25/91 A C" E ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION THEFT- %251- %25DO -FE -FRM BUILDING-OTH PRC7 IHEFI %2500-FE-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP THEFT -%250 LESS-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP THEFT - %2' LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY THEFT- %250 LESS MS -FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP 5`J tHfTT -5250 LESS- MS-FRM YARDS -0TH PROP THEFT 5250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS-OTH PROP THEFT %250 LESS MS•FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP THEFT - %250 LESS- MS-FAM FISHHOUSE-OTH PROP '6 THEfI - MS - BY CHEC. %25U LESS -'5 THEFT MS-ISSUE WORTHLES CHECK-S250 LESS 9 THEFT-MS-ISSUE UORTHLES CHECK - $200 OR LESS S?98 THEfI -MIS - SHOPLIFTING - %200 OR LES' '1 VFH THEFT- FE-OVER S2500-AUIO VEH 1HEfT -FE OVER 2500-SNOWMOBILE VfH Wit FL-251.2500-SNOWMCBILE . - WEAFOhS MS OTHER ACT-OTHER TYPE-UNLAW PURPOS IUTALS: PAGE • - - - • PATROL AREAS • • • . - . . . . . . 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 P,0 90 T01A: 1 1 1 0 E 1 t i t 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 40 46 95 57. 115 4 5 5 5 ?s? • 9 5,74 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 0 E 1 t i t 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 40 46 95 57. 115 4 5 5 5 ?s? • 9 5,74 w;i: 26 FES 91 INSTALLATION NAME - HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 0101 •••••• PkIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S �SPOSITICN CODES: ALI ACTIVITY CCK?ES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 01/26/91 THOU 02/25/91 / ...... **........ OFFENSES CLEARED ................. A;;1Iy'Iy C.t'f OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST •... BY TOTAL PERCENT .R; PT!GN REPORTED ............................................................-............... UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION ............................... CLEARED CLEARED 4 0 4 1 2 0 1 3 75.0 A S�.' 5 1 A[IEMPTS HRM- MANDS-ADLT-FAM A` %' 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 C A1'EM,iS HRM-HANDS-ADLT -ACO a;i54 5 1 4 3 0 0 1 1 25.0 INFI1..1 W EMPTS HRM-NMS- CHLD-FAM A5iS5 2 0 2 0 6 1 1 2 100.0 A,LT 5 INFI {.' AT',EMPTS HRH CHLD -ACO 6 { 54 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 nURG 5-UWOC� ki S FRC 0 UNK HEAP - CON THEFT 61 60 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 BL'kG 4-UNCK:C N,Rf S FRC-N UNK HEAP -UNK ACT 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0 S SMALL AM+a NT MARIJUANA- POSSESSION E�'00 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 E3C FLEF AN OFFICER Fil ?1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 A.SC% 1 INHAS 40 HEA -OT RESID-S20000 NOME 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 FAM HS NEGLFLT OF A CHILD 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 .wi:E 147,lk INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0 M A;,AVA!Ei) VIOLATION 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 ON - 11k INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 S A i 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 100.0 572 RUN: 26-FEB-91 INSTALLATION NAME MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OFFO1 R ••••• PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DISPOSITION CODES: All ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION • GRID: ALL 01/26/91 THRU 02/21/91 / ---------------- OFFENSES CLEARED - -••- ----- -•• -/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL ----BY ARREST •• -- BY TOTAL PE ; =EN DESCRIPTION REPORTED ------ ---------•-•- ---...-...--.........-...-...-----..-.-.-........•----------•.-...-----..-.. UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE ..........----....._........... EXCEPTION CLEARED C.EA;EE .... M4199 3 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 1C :.0 LIOUOR • OTHER M5350 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 „ =.0 RUNAWAY M6501 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA- POSSESSION N3190 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 DISTURB PEACE -MS- HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS P3110 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 C PROP DAMAGE INTENT T0992 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT•UNK LVL VAL-FRM OTHER T2021 3 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 5C.� THEFT -5251 S2500-FE-FRN BUILDING - MONEY T2029 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1C:.0 THEFT•S251 $2500 BUILDING-OTH PROP T2059 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT- S251-S2500-FE-FRM YARDS-OTH PROP T3159 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 � THEFT4250 LESS-FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -0TH PROP T <021 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 r p T!Efl-%250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-MONEY 1:29 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT4250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP 1.059 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 THEFT 5250 LESS-MS -FRM YARDS•OTH PROP 14!99 1 0 1 1 0 0 THEFT -1250 LESS-MS-FRM SELF SRV GAS -0TH PROP 10159 2 0 2 2 0 !"EFT-S250 LESS-MS FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP • 178 Rl'1: 26-fEB 91 'LLATION NAME •• MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 oF�u1 •••••• PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F O R S CODES: All . SPOSITION ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFEASE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 01/26/91 THRU 02125191 /---------------- OFFENSES CLEARED --- -- --- • - - - - -- -/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL - ---BY ARREST- - -- ST TOTAL PERCENT CF WRIPTION REPORTED - --- ----- --- -------- ............................................................................... UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION ---.. - -.... CLEARED ... ..-..--.. CLEARED --- 1.'89 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 I +EFT -S250 LESS-MS-FRM FISHHOUSE-OIH PROP Ui16 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 THEFT MS-BY CHECK -5250 LESS U3U26 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 T »EFT-MS 4IORTHLES CHECK -1250 LESS u',028 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 TrEFT-MS-ISSUE VORTHLES CHECK - $200 OR LESS U1288 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 100.0 THEFT-MIS-SHOPLIFfING . $200 OR LESS V1021 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 VEH THEFT- FE-OVER 12500-AUTO 2 IDTHEFT 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 2500 V2026 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 VEH THEFT -FE - 251- 25DO•SN06"OBILE w"; 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 Ufa' ;ONS - MS -OTHER ACT -OTHER TYPE -UNLAU PURPOS k ''0 TOTALS - 68 3 65 31 15 9 v 34 5 r.3 • 529 h MOUND POLICE RESERVES MONTHLY HOURS FEBRUARY, 1991 DE AILS EMER RES. COMM H/F TRAlk INSTR RIDE MEET C/0 SQUAD SERV BALL ING TION ALONG ADMIN ING BA DGE N 1 3.5 3.5 2.0 7.0 20.0 1.0 4 3.0 6.5 8.5 1.5 5 7.5 8.5 21.0 2.0 6.0 1.0 10 - 88.5 13 14 1.0 16 17 20 A CTIV E RES 22 58.5 23 R4 Fleming 26 40.0 28 5.5 53 56.5 55 44.5 56 2.5 2.5 10.0 3.5 57 58 In Trai_nins 59 M. Valstrom TOTAL 16.5 14.5 31.0 19.5 288.0 (R22 1' PS. FROM JANUARY) 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 7.9 16.0 21.5 7.5 MO "NTHL - VITIES A CTIV E RES R1 Nelson Ride Alongs R4 Fleming Hockey Games R5 Fox, J. Public Safety Show R14 Zuccaro Fingerprinting - Brownies R23 Kangas Reserve Squad R28 Geyen Meeting R56 Fox, K. Dances Transports In Trai_nins Henn. Cty. Aux. School M. Valstrom S. Nasset J. Swensen P. Haarstad . 59 1 6 1 5. Nalsur•� G. „ >taf „r W. Her Jr ick n T IhC!r pS -, ; TOTAL 37.0 19.5 46.0 88.5 0 0 0 1.0 0 0 0 58.5 4 6.5 56.5 44,5 22.5 0 1.0 0 421.; • • MOUND POLICE RESERVES SEVERENCE ACCOUNTS FEBRUARY, 1991 • • OFF ICER DEPOSIT BALANCE Ruth Vogel 0 498.50 Sherry 2uccaro 0 201.50 Dave Nelson 0 343.50 Jeff Fleming 0 280.00 Tom Geyen 0 130.00 Jim Fox 0 286.00 Damion Shell 0 65.00 Katie Fox 0 234.00 Richard Jazowski 0 19.50 TOTALS S 0 52,058.00 KF /sh IL 11 March 7, 1991 TO: Ed Shuk1e City Manager FROM; Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator SUBJECT; February's Recycling After much discussion with Mark Heieren from Knutson we have decided to set up the field trip for viewing the MRF for some time in mid April. The MRF just started it's operations in March. They would like to make sure everything is operating smoothly before they start their tours. Minnetrista OK'ed for us to have the compost site again. They also mentioned that there is quite a pile of compost that is ready for use. They will be bring some of this material out by their driveway for people to pick -up. I did get one positive response to the $3.00 charge per quarter. She said that if she was paying for the service she was going to use it. We received our first check from Knutsons for 1/3 of the profits of the material picked up, the check was $472.60. February's tonnage was 63.12 tons, compared to 40.87 last February. • • Sgz. (T VY ( A .N1( )[ 'O'1 March 7, 1991 TO; Ed Shukle City Manager FROM; Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT; February Activity Report i SEWER & WATER Unit #16, 75 L 8000 Dump - replaced broken left rear axel. Unit #3, 87 Chev. PU - new starter. Unit #11, 87 Chev. PU - oil change, and service Unit #15, 73 Chev. Dump - brake repair Unit #9, 85 Chev. 1 -ton PU - flat tire, beacon switch and new tail lite. STREET DEPT. Unit #13 , Chev. Dump - hydralic hose repair, signal flasher. Unit #1, 87 Chev. PU- service Unit #6, 81 Ford L8000 Dump - Tail light Repair PARKS Unit #37, 90 Chev. PU - service PiLICE DEPT. 840, 90 Pontiac Service 841, 89 Pontiac - Service n 59.3 i ---- Mar ^h 1, 1991 TO: MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL FROM: JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER RE: FEBRUARY 1991 REPORT Well, February certainly rebounded from a dismal beginning of the year. Whereas, January's sales were dead even with January of 1990, this February rocketed past February of 1990 by 19$. Last year sales in February were $60,854 and this February they were $72,664. What happened to ca°ise such a big disparity between the months? When January arrived a number of people had stocked up enough so that they did not have to visit our facility. By February their cache had run its course. And those who had made New Year resolutions to either quit or cut back on their drinking apparently threw in the towel. This tremendous increase was hoped for, expected and necessary. the higher sales was not a result of bringing in more customers. Last year in February we had 6,173 customers and this February we had 6217. Forty more people does not make that big of a difference. What has occurred is simply that the cost of goods has risen drastically, because of the higher Federal Excise Tax, and the same people are drinking in the same amcunts. I guess they have swallowed their pride and accepted the fact that if they want to continue to drink. they are going to %.av -. to pay the price. JK :ls • • 0 ssy MOUND t l RK UI PAR 111 N'I MON111LY ACTI6I I REPURT LAST YEAR �- M(WIll OE E'F:RBUARY 1991 tm{ "Kill TO DATE TO HATE ND. OF CAI IS 33 24 W 57 MOUNp FIRE MINNETONKA BEACH tMFkCEMY u MI RI.-SIA FIRE - --- L__.._.__ 2 FMrRGc XY 0 ()HONO 1 FIRE 0 j F'KIN6 PARK FIRE - b - -- - ? _ MIJI'Al• AID FlkE_ - -- 0 0 0 — F�IEXC F:*1 Y 0 0 0 U TOTAL FIRE CALLS S ,8 9 27 23 TOTAL F.MER(:EN(:Y CALLS 15 15 30 14 0Mt1ERCIAL 0 0 O 3 RF51[>fMIAL 8 5 13 14 INDUSTRIAL, 0 1 I 1 GRASS 6 MISY;F].IANFX)US 5 1 6 — 4 AU ID 2 2 4 1 F'AI SF. AI AR!1 3 �42 0 �- 3 0 W. OF lkt'k,S FIRE 79 3Z1 08 - M01_'ND F71ERf FNC Y 188 207 395 3 4 30 36 716 621 43 0 43 40 - MTKA BEACH t21t�ta�Y --- 0 8 u- 8 - 0 -- - TYtL91- 43 -- 8 _- 51 -- 40 _._. F IEF. - -- 69 N+ 133 43 M'TRISTA F711k;F'V "t 0 41 41 -- _ --__ 121 -- IY rl .Al, b9 105 174 164 FINE 18 78 96 269 ORONO fT!fl ;i.x Y FI() 21 101 131 D rJ al, 9h 99 1 40() FIRE. U 0 0 17:14000 U _ _._.. -_ _ . L U -- - - - - - -- �) FiRF: 112 3fi 15n Xi SP. PARK tMtRC In y 1) 3f I Ir l Tt?TA l_ -- -_- 112 i4 1 ,1 -_____.._ FIRE 0 r r /-- - WII'Al. AID F?4:RGF X' Y 0 r, TOTAL U r• i TUTAI, DRILL r:OURS TUTAI. FIRE H!)CRS 4h4 TVTA! E;MFK1 FtiG'Y H( Uk - T(1fAI FIRE _& WFk F4 Y HIRRS.___ _ MUTUAL. AID RECEIVED� 0 C 1 _ -- M(TrA1. AID GIVEN 0 ) sgs MOUND Voll'NIJER FIRK DEPARTMENT ss� FOR MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1991 FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS & MAINTENANCE FIRE & RESCUE DUE Ivay. Ivills []till, MpLL-g, 1XQ1 H] Jay 2/11 11113 _W% p, 111w, K1W RKW. JEFF ANIWILSEN 2 1 j) 2 21 f x GREG t.NI*3L x -- — 2 -- - ---- 1 1 �. J) ---- - - 27 - - - - _ _ _ - ..b 00 162.00 JExkY We. x x 1(4. 3 2 ------ ------- - L - DAVID W111) x x D(IN likyfl" x BpyC x 1 - 1 V - DAVID CARL SON x x 14. 1) b. 00 JAMf.'; CASEY x x 2 2 1 5t.00 STENY COIJ-1 x x 2 MIKE DAVID x x 7 ' x RANDY E2Cl1tAkr x 2 STTXF FT I Co(3)N -�.Ah-_ 78.00 PHIL FISK JERRY GAWAIS X x x 2 V DAN I El, (ZW)Y KEVIN GRAVY q 2 _ 174-00 CRAIG HENDERSON __19 ' A) PAUTI, HF!*Y x ?s 00 BRAD LWIS?WN x RON KARX11YE JOILN NAWS x 2 150.00 MAR I N NT-ISON BR, ET NICLTIM 2 _2 3 .6. 00 __96.00 Y BUD OPITZ X X GRFX, PALM X X x TIM PAIN r 2 Tx)NY RA:A ;SFN MIKF 41VAGE t.ik Rf STAII.K•k!; f, T W 11.1 [Xkt; r 77'r J!". rl ss� D R I L L R E P 0 R T MOUND FIRE DE'PARTMEN'T' Date FE D, /9 199 scipline and Teamwork Pumper Operation c r it tque of f irt-s, Fire Strearis & Friot ion Pre -plan and Inspoct, ions House Burnings Tools anii Apparatus Idlentify Natural /Propane Gas Hand Fxt inquishear Operation Ladder Evolutions Wea llrotei:t. i ve CI (A h i rig Salvage Operat Films Radio Operations First. aid and Rescue operation House Evolutions Use of Self - Contained Masks Nozzles & Hose Appliari,-,� Hours Training Paid : Excused X Unexecuspd 0 Present / Nl-t P,iid scellanoous ---HA2-A'Rr-)0L4.S MATt(Z(AL 14 V P h R S 0 N N F 1, 2 J (;, rva i s YL J Andf rson 0 V L 1 /t. G.Andorson rz D . (; rad y C Z . Ba b 1) 2 Y2 :K .( 24- D.BoYd ;Y 2- D.Bryc(- P. FI( .A& 'S.f3ryce - Y t- D. Ca r l son 2 /L R Ma I S i i k Z Y - - J.Casey J . N, i f i Z S Collins I Ne son Yz M. Dav ' M N P I s (-) ri 1,R.Englphart B . N 1 c c u r, —& S.Erickson 2Y P. F i sk 2 2-yi Z Vt. 2- Yz- t j I l r, 2, '/ I, () � /J. - A"W" rl Y, 2 iaris 159 1 D R I L L R E P O R T MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Date ice. 11, 159 Discipline and Teamwork Pumper Operation Critique of fires — Fire Streams & Friction Loss Pre -plan and Inspections _ House Burni.ngs Tools and Apparatus Identify _ Natural /Propane Gas demos. Hand Extinguisher Operation Ladder Evolutions Wearing Protective Clothing Salvage Operations Films Radio Operations First aid and Rescue Operation Z �L House Evolutions Use of Self- Contained Masks —^ — Nozzles & Hose Appliance Hours Training Paid ® Excused X Unexecused O Present / Not Paid RE:c ke C P 2 ° Miscellaneous __ D�iLL. Q?Ltn _ - g!GE KEzc4 C Q�piT GRom �0`9� dti[4 P A M /►'i'K5 P AU►1 R&45ie.ef 4ef01 / P E R S O N N E 1, 2�, J.Andersen J.G,3rvaIs ?� _Alt 2 % D.Gi ariy YZJ.Ba1)b �- ZK.Grady �%� DBo1d 2% C.H�ndrrs +.n i 2jg,.D :Bryr,F 2 %.P.Hf.nry 2 �jS.Bryce 2�' B.L.3n {lsr.in y 2 -1 - 1). Carlson � LR.M,� rs hk 2j2&O.J.Case 2 %J.N,ifus 2_ /�S.Collins 2/z J.N,rlso,i Z �M.David Z�y M.Nels ,n Z7 /�R . Eng l r-ha rt Z Jt B . N i ccur� - - - S.Fricvkson %A.c)pif . r. W ` r 2 �Z G .Pa I m* P a l m ft , T. Palm 2 . PedersonA _G 2, T.Rassmusen _Zy2._. M . Savage * 2 i K.Sipprell 2% P.Stallman Swenson w* 7� T. s_W. Swenson 2 I R.Williams �. Z k-T •Willlams DATE n u MOUN^ FIRE DEP TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR MONTH OF MEN ON DUTY 0 J. ANDERSEN _ G. ANDERSON J. BABB �Z D. BOYD D D. hRYCE _ S. BRYCE D. CARLSON 5 J. CASEY S. COLLINS �..� M. DAVID R. ENGELHART S. ERICKSON P. FISK J_ J. GARVAIS D. GRADY K. GRADY a C. HENDERSON P. HENRY B. LANDSMAN D W. SWENSON _ P. MARSCHKE S J. NAFUS J. NELSON M. NELSON V B. NICCUM A. OPITZ C. PALM M. PALM T. PALM G G. PFDERSON _ T. RASMIISSFN M. SAVAGE K. SIPPRELL R. STALLMAN U T. SWENSON TOTAI. MONTHLY I, :..RS d' (c AQ W. SWENSON R. WILLIAMS C T. WILLIAMS TOTAI. MONTHLY I, :..RS d' (c AQ March 4, 1991 TO: MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER FROM: JOHN L. NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR RE:: FEBRUARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT REPORT INVE,HhEbT5 ':he following is February investment activity: Balance: Februar; 1, 1991 Bought: C 6.45 Dain Bosworth Due 5 -3 -91 Matured: co 7.80 4M Fund T Notes 9.38 Dain Balan - February 28, 1991 1.99a__ "DIT YLL WOOD ROAD ViNNESOTA 51.364 472-1155 $7,056,596 197,348 (75,000)' $6,868,744 A good portion of my time in February was spent in preparation for the annual audit. All year end adjustments must be made to close out the accounts for 1990. The final audit report is scheduled to be presented to the Council the second meeting in April. The auditcr and myself w,ll be in attendance at that meeting. JN :ls • • • S147 :F I \ A N is X ',NNI � ESOTA MEMORANDU DATE: March 4, 1991 TO: City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official SUBJECT: February 1991 Monthly Report -C9NSTRUUTIO AC.11Y1T1 In February, 9 buildirg pe its were issued for a total valuation of $67,800. This v Lion `s down 67% from the month of February 1990. There were 10 plumbing, mechanical, and miscellaneous permits issued for a total of 19 pc;rmits issued in the month of February. This resulted in approximately 56 related inspections by this • department. This number does not include inspections by our plumbing inspector or Metro West Inspection Services. PLA�lI11N� � .14N1N� The Planning Commission and City Council was busy with a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized garage and variance request for lot size and setback on a nonconforming lot. We are continuing work with the Planning Commission and the City Planner on Zonin,, Code modifications. TRAINING_ AND MEEILUZ I attended the regular Building Official's monthly meeting and a bo,:ird meeting for the Lake Country Chapter of ICBO. Peggy and I spent a half day visit at the City of Prior Lake reviewing their permit application process and the mechanics of their filing system, complaint handling and forms. The purpose of this visit is for comparison and possible modifications to our system to allow for better public service and efficiency. IS: Pj U 5-1/ ,579 C I T Y OF AWND 5341 M�3yj F04Xjo Mound, MN 55%4 BUILDING ACTIVITY REPORT MWW%d—ZrkLlL&U -FY 1991 NEW RESIDENTIAL CON STRUCTION lf&wAo —aw 70,000 at.; ftmi' Tow Few, U 70,000 Fww —AtS,DE TA Tow NNvfm* NE w NON Rw ft— 0� ------- TOW No* Aesbftr*W RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS p— 9— —a— 2 2 42,300 c— DEf ILL 3,000 r :7 Mf sc Remodel ' - T.W A.1-6-ho 9 9 67.800 13 89,700 NONRESIDENTIAL ADCW TPONS & ALTERATIONS p— •-_ — w b_ -- - - I • c- 7' , LAP TO nAl' 159,700 CllrlVE ASION To. rq mr, ryw)NS L l�lil--ItL "TONS sw aa, TOT .L 19 0 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: MARCH 4, 1991 SUBJECT: FEBRUARY MONTHLY REPORT There were two regular Council Meetings in February. There was agenda preparation, minutes, 9 resolutions, and clean -up items from the two meetings. I am continuing to input the 1991 mintues, (resolutions and motions) on the Clerk's Index Program. The sales and burials in the Cemetery in the last part of 1990 and the beginning of 1991 have been inputted into the computer. . I finished microfilming the packets from 1990 so that we can get rid of the originals. This will save filing space. I am filming 1991 as we complete them. I am working on updating the Code Book. As I stated before as Sections are amended or added I are trying to get them on the computer. I completed my annual report which was presented at the February 26th Meeting. I am working on a up -to -date zoning map for use in my office. There were the usual :ils and questions from citizens regarding various subiects. fc • 1 s�3 AL March 4, 1991 TO; Ed Shukle City Manager FROM; Greg Skinner Water b Sewer Supt. SUBJECT; February's Activity Report In February we pumped 18,593,000 gallons of water. We had 1 watermain break. The water tower at Chateau Lane has been repaired. We have ordered the altitude control valve. This will arrive in 4 to 6 weeks. We are looking for a mid -April start up. Well #6 (behind the Fire Station) has been pulled again for repairs. This well has been a real pain in the neck for some time now. We will be exploring a new direction this time that will reduce the maintenance and down time that we have been experiencing over the last few years. SEWER DEPT. The Sewer Dept. now has two new lift stations, our upgrades are finished with both station and are working fine. In between working with the contractor on the lift station upgrades they preformed cabinet check and pump maintenance. LJ • E �y • March 4, 1991 11 CITY ( A N 1( )[ ','1) TO; Ed Shukle City Manager FROM; Geno Hoff Street Supt. SUBJECT; February Activity Report The 1st of February was like a Spring day, 42 degrees and the water was running. We had a number of catchbasins that had . some surface ice covering the openings, no big problem. We had everything open in a day and a -half. When the weather warms up into the 40's in the winter time the watermain breaks get a little soft so we spent some time smoothing out the rough spots. When we had the nice weather this month we spent some time working on our street right -a -ways. Last year we started in Three Points and went clock wise around tt-wn trimming and cutting brush. We completed everything from Co. Rd. 110 north to Co. Rd. 125 going into the Island. This year we've been working on Island Park and have completed about three quarters of the work, and if the weather and time permits we plan on finishing the Island this year. we ended up with above average snowfall for the month of February, about 15 ". We were out sanding or plowing and sanding 6 different times. We cleaned the sidewalks every time it snowed but hauled snow away only 3 times. We ran out of salt sand about the middle of the month so we spent some time mixing another 550 tons. It's more than likely we'll have to mix another batch for March. . SIGM WORK Replaced 2 stops, 2 No Parking, 5 street name signs and straighten 4 posts. We took 24 stop signs, backs and faces to Hennepin County Sign Shop and used their equipment to reface the, signs., 5 9S" • CEMETERY WORD( This was the second month that it has been quiet in the cemetery. The only thing that we have been doing is plowing and sanding the driveway. • LJ S 14 �1( )l' \1) FEBRUARY 1991 MONTHLY REPORT PARKS DEPARTMENT Parks In February we begin to look at the upcoming spring and summer. Contact is made with the crew from last summer to see if they will be returning. As of today, all but one has committed to be back. This return of past seasonal employees helps the Parks Department considerably because we can get right to work with the crews working on their own. The equipment that Is to be purchased has been ordered and w i 1 1 be on hand well before it's needed. This year we replaced one of the small push mowers and both of the weed whips. For the larger mowers we replaced all the seasonal worn parts such as drive belts, mower blades, and serviced all fluid and filters. S The status of the outdoor rinks was very poor at _he end of February. We had that warm spell that took out just about all the ice. We gave it one more try flooding at the last few days of February. but gave up the first of March. The rinks have not been re- flooded since then, and the lights have been turned off. Ceme tery_ With the next melt ail the Christmas wreaths will be removed. Again, this year we will have to do some grass seeding due to the problems we had from the drought killing the ground cover. Memorial weekend comes fast and the grounds will need repair from the winter burials. Docks .1 he dock applications came in very slow, 108 only until the last week of February, then at the last few clays in February they came in very heavy. Again, each year we see a lot of questions from re�i I t c r-, on Com -- mon�_ docks. I have had Tom mccaffrey handling the m,3 jc,r i ty of these inquiries so he will be real familiar with the dc,ck system. • Tree Notices 1 had no complaints on trees during February. I will be attend- ing a seminar on effects of the last drought on tren -, this M<3rch. S17 4 � — *O%NNFr v 1 q n u �►' p; t WARD ME MBE AS U.lvdtf COGN'm Cnau Gocn...na;d AMAO fosfec V.co OwVh" n Jan 1kNMV.kel Sntrnlary MdWXg0n►4 fivacn JrfW IQYrllin, frpa S"r.r M•xr,.lr.ya [)apl.is r 11:ahux:M Swwv Park I onk,f 0 W .Jnrs N Gran wad k auv.rw .aF iktn 1. fiver Orcxw win C Mri.nk.r V.cfo'u rrVaryfl Mann . WAY1.11a WWII K Pmspury M.nnnfcxrka fi_cx•n flaccc.p ;tuxnk<xx) T 04 W Room Mono ilcrtxrn f Skx. I Woorfl.ax7 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 9001 ASt WAI lA! A 90Ut I VAf7U 5U111 If,0 WAVIATA WNM SOTA Y.391 Tf1#FWNf 617147370 EUGENE R. STROMMEN f xf CuI1H prtff (:TCJf1 TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: MARCH 5, 1991 FRONT: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECT: FEBRUARY REPORT - LMCD ' I FA 1.1 Eurasion WatermilfoR Tack Force, The LMCD Board has approved a 1991 harvesting budget of S263M, that includes the barge method of weed disposal. Only that amount of funds presently available, approximately, $125,000 have been appropriated however. The County has apparently opted out of their $85M share, and private donations have fallen somewhat behind plan. A renewed fund drive is being planned. We will be accepting weeds at the barge, collected from the shore line, from private individuals, free of charge. There may be a small charge for commercial collectors providing a collecting service for profit. Mr Ted Maro has been retained as project manager. He is a landscape architect by education and experience. In addition he has had some related experience with the Fish and Wildlife Service. He also brings to the program a mechanical aptitude so necessary to understanding the harvesters. Detailed planning for the summer program is now proceeding. 1.2. Comprehensive Lake Management plan Consultation with the dissenting cities continues, seeking an amicable solution. A key meeting with the cities, the Metropolitan Council facilitator and the LMCD takes place March 6th. I will be out of town and thus, cannot attend. It would be well, if Skip Johnson could attend. 6 cities have signed up to work with us on the Shoreline Rules adoption. More have indicated a willingness to do so. The DNR has stated that they will start the profess when we have 7 cities signed. Orono. Wayzata and Minnetonka will in all probability go their own way in negotiating terms of the shorcland plan. What will come of the remaining points of contention: the LMCD Board makeup and the wider tax levying authority is anyone's guess. 1.3 Other General Interest Items We have been working with Reps Abrams, Smith and Kinkel on suggestions for weed control legislation and Personal • SW • Water Craft regulation. We have the feeling that these legislators do not appreciate the true potential scope of the weed problem. No $2 surcharge on boat licenses will begin to address the work that needs to be done. I have been researching the Zebra Mussel problem. particularly in New York state, where I have a niece consulting engineer who is involved. The spread there from the Great Lakes to the inland lakes is progressing. The mussel, if it arrives will make the Milfoil look like dandelines in severity. There appears to be no way to adequately quarantine the mussel out of a body of water. I can see the day, when a boat, once launched in a lake or river, will have to be restricted to that body of water forever. 2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS . MO 1ND 2.1 There is a very bright shoreline light that shines out on the water on the north side of Priest's Bay. This presents a • danger to summer and winter nightime navigation on the bay. This is violation of existing code. I have asked the Water Patrol to tjlk t:► the i,%lividual to see if the light can be other directed. &M KL'CSe Mound Representative Lake Minnetonka Conservation District TR:mac cc. Genc Strommcn TR:mac • 2 s9? Steve Smith 353 State Office Bldg St Paul, MN 55155 Dear Steve, 5641 Bartlett Blvd Mound, M14 55364 March 5, 1991 I would make the following comments on your draft Personal Watercraft Bill 1) P2, Line4. I feel that restricting operation after 6.00PM is unduly restrictive 2) P2, Line 12. Requiring the PWC to operate at closed throttle when within 150 feet of other boat, introduces a definite safety hazzard, as this will make the PWC be without steering way while potentially in the wake of some very large and fast boats, when passing through narrow passages and meeting or being overtaken. Not a wise provision! 3) We have found the no- prolonged operation provision, contrary to advance expectation, to b? s- minently workable and effective in curbing one of the m annoying characteristics of PWC operation on crowded lakes. Yo•jr s truly, Toni Peec'(' mour F:�F �re��nt�a�ive LMCD TF. rnac WL C • • Steve Smith We Rtpreaw tive Is 383 Stale Office Bldg. St Pauk MN 55155 612. 2969198 01strbl 43A Minnesota I souse of Representatives February 15, 1991 Mr. �om R 5641 Lett Blvd Moy1t MN 55364 t t f ( �� t/ Dear Tom. 2 l Enclosed is a copy of a proposed bill regulating the use and operation of "personal watercraft" /jet skis. It's my intent at this point to add some additional language, however, setting a maximum decib91 limit and also testing for deci "l limits when the watercraft is out of the water. Further, I think additional language would be appropriately included to prohibit modification of factory exhaust systems that may meet with deci "l limits. As always, your comments are welcome. Sin rely, Steve Smith State Representative jr cc: Linda /Mound City Hall • 60/ -J. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERV ATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES 6 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ACB IiDA RECD MAR 41991 Saturday, March 9, 1991 Community Room, Norwest Bank Building 900 East Wayzata Blvd., Suite 135 (Elevator access for handicapped: use west entrance on Wayzata Blvd) 1. Bowers variance to establish a dock use area during; low water. 2. The Harborage variance for a dock use area adjustment, or for a side setback variance, for a change: in dock configuration. 3. Approve 1991 multiple dock license renewal applications. 4. Report on Channel Drive Homeowners Association (St. Albans Bay) dredging. 5. Proposed ordinance amendment 52.11 Conversion of Use (Chapman Place and Excelsior Bay Associates). 6. Develop a mission statement for the Wetland Subcommittee. 7. Discuss policy for adjustment of dock use area. • 8. Update on deicing inspections. 9. Review District Mooring Areas as '_hey relate to I.MCD policy statement. 10. Additional business recommended by the committee. ENVIRONMENT 1. Eurasian Water Milfoil 'Task Force, Chair Ree!;t- A. Progress on lakeshore weed pickup pro) i . m B. Response to Rep. Kinkel's Bill regardin, f +,r control of exotics. C. Operations progress. 2. Additional business reccmmnende(I by the c.r,mmitI( 3-1 -91 • 402.. CITY COUNCIL PACKET - - 3 -12 -91 #2 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473 -7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE March 1991 Management Program review, Board and all cities 7:00 p.m., Wayzata City Hall, 600 Rice Street, Wayzata Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m., Norwest Bank Building Wayzata 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 135 Superior Street, east entrance Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8 :30 a.m., Norwest Bank Building Wayzata 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 160 Superior Street, east entrance Monday 25 Lake Use Committee 4 :30 p.m., Norwest Bank Building Wayzata 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 160 Superior Street, east entrance Wednesday 27 0 2-27-91 LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall 403 RLCP MAR , 41991 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Action Report: Lake Use Committee Meeting: Monday, Febr»ary 25, 1991 4:30 p.m. Wayzata Norwest Bank Building Community Room Members Present: Bert Foster, Vice Chair, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; Robert Pillsbury, Chair, Minnetonka; Scott Carlson, Minnetrista; Thomas Reese, Mound; Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay. Also present: Sgt. Wm. Chandler, Sheriff's Water Patrol; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order at 4:32 p.m. by Chair Pillsbury. 1. Request for Slow Buoy at Coffee Channel The Committee received a request from Jim Urban, Crystal Bay, for a Slow Buoy at the east end of Coffee Channel. Pillsbury reported he has talked to Mrs. Urban and Denis Bailey, Engineering Technician, Hennepin County Lake Improvement. Bailey suggested bringing out the channel buoys 75 feet from the channel' on the Crystal Bay side, in lieu of slow buoys. Mrs. Urban agreed this would be a good solution. Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend requesting Denis Bailey to move the the red and green channel buoys on the East side of Coffee Channel out 75' to 100'. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Resolution Establishing Fees for Adding a Port of Call, per Code 5.44, Subd. 4. Strommen explained that Code 5.44, Subd. 4 provides for a public hearing when a licensee for a liquor license application renewal adds a Port of Call. To date, no fee has been set to cover the cost of iublication of the public hearing and administrative costs. Bjorlin moved, Fo::ter seconded, to recommend a Resolution to establish a fee of $150.00 when adding a Port of Call to a liquor license application renewal. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Revised Draft of MN DNR Bill for an Act Relating to Personal Watercraft. • The committee received a report from Thibault that the revised draft of the MN DNR Bill for an Act relating to Personal Watercraft does not include LMCD's suggestion for a slow no wake speed within 150 feet of a "moored or anchored" watercraft. The Bill adds "a personal watercraft may by operated at a reasonable speed within 150 feet of the shoreline for the purpose of directly accessing and returning from the open speed zone ". The DNR did not add the prohibition "to buzz, chase or spray any other watercraft ". - continued 6oy I Lake Use Committee February 25, 1991 The item in the Bill of most concern to the Committee is a section which restricts personal watercraft operating within 150 feet of another watercraft, other than another personal watercraft, at greater than a slow -no wake speed. The Committee is firm in its belief that this creates a safety hazard. Chandler offered to talk to Anita Twarowski, MN DNR Boating Staff Specialist, to clarify LMCD's concerns. Foster- moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend a request to the Sheriff's Water Patrol to work with the MN DNR staff technical people regarding the 150' slow -no wake speed because a serious hazard exists for the personal watercraft operator. Motion carried unanimously. Reese moved, Foster seconded, to recommend staff write to the NN DNR urging inclusion of the prolonged operation restriction. Motion carried unanimously. 4. Resolution $59, Policy on Open Water Fishing Contest Permits Thibault explained that Resolution #59, Policy on Open Water Fishing Contest Permits, requires that a copy of the DNR permit is needed along with the LMCD application. This requirement causes excessive delays in issuing the permit. The DNR permit is needed before the contest can be held, an inspection verification LMCD can make through spot checks. Grathwol moved, Bjorlin seconded, to recommend deletion of the requirement that a copy of the DNR permit is needed with the LMCD application for an open water fishing contest permit. Motion carried unanimously. 5. On -sale Wine License Fee for a Preliminary Investigation Strommen explained that the Resolution Establishing Liquor License fees for the Sale of Liquor on the Lake requires a $3,000 advance deposit for the preliminary investigation required for the initial application or an application for transfer of an "on- sale" liquor license. The Resolution does not address an application for a wine on -sale license separately. Strommen stated the cost of investigation is nominal, averaging well under $500, and the $3,000 fee is burdensome for those making application for an "on-sale" wine license only. Grathwol moved, Reese seconded, to add a Section "e." setting the preliminary investigation fee for an "on- sale" wine license at $500, with the same provisions for refund of unused balance and over -cost recoup as for a liquor license. Motion carried unanimously. S. Sheriff's Water Patrol Annual Operating Agreement Strommen reported receipt of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol annual 1191 operating agreement amended by the ,County Attorney. He explained the County Board no longer will automatically renew annual agreements. The Agreement contains continued Lake Use Committee February 25, 1991 the provisions that were recommended by the Lake Use sub- committee members and approved by the Board 9- 26 -90, except for removing the automatic renewal provision, and a hold harmless clause for LMCD as a result of actions of Hennepin County Sheriff's employees. Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend approval of the 1991 annual operating agreement with the Hennepin County Sheriff for the Water Patrol as amended. Motion carried unanimously. T. Withdrawn S. Special Zvent Refunds Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend. approval of the following special event refunds: a. Deposit refund for Lafayette Club's 2/3/91 winter event $100. b. keturn deposit for canceled kite flying event at Excelsior Chamber of Commerce's Chili Open 2/8/91 - $100. Motion carried unanimously. 9. Sumer Rules - Publication with Solicitation of Funds Strommen proposed an envelope with a perforated tear off flap to be inserted in the summer rules brochure. The campaign would be aimed at the contributor in the $5 to $25 range. Pillsbury suggested a change in the pledge card which would give the contributor a choice of the allocation of the pledge. It was suggested the order of selections would be changed to: 1) Use any way; 2) Weed control; 3) Information, Education; 4) Water Patrol, Public Safety. Grathwol moved, Bjorlin seconded, to recommend approval of the concept of a pull out envelope to go with the summer rules, as suggested by the Executive Director. Motion carried unanimously. Carlson offered help to reach the larger donors which he knows. A review of the solicitation list will require assistance of persons familiar with major donors, Strommen added. The Executive Director will draft a solicitation letter directed to larger donors as the entire fund raising program is evaluated to reach its goal. The letter, plus personal contact, would be directed to a select list of contributors with the potential of making contributions in the $2,000 to $5,000 range. 10. Water Patrol Report Chandler reported: • 0 * The fish house count shows 1356 fish houses compared to 1240 in 1990. The largest number were in Phelps Bay. 40t, - continued K] Lake Use Committee February 25, 1991 * A large snowmobile theft ring particularly after "Polaris Trail Indies" has been operating throughout the state. They are now working on the Lake. * The Water Patrol has been cooperating with the MN DNA Conservation Officers on the Lake clean -up. * There continues to be many fish house break -ins. Despite a publicity program people continue to store valuables in theig fish houses. * There have been eight DWIs on Lake Minnetonka, most of thew issued to car drivers. * The Water Patrol is trying to locate a place for a training session in April. The National Sheriff's Association will have its convention in Minneapolis in June. They plan on having a fishing contest as part of their program and may ask for a waiver of fees. * Chandler will check out Reese's report of a glaring high pressure sodium light on the north side of Priest's Bay. 11. Hennepin County Proposals for 1991 Lake !Minnetonka Services and Projects Denis Bailey, Engineering Technician, Hennepin County Lake Improvement Section has advised the District that the Lake is Improvement budget, as presented on 1- 14 -91, is being reduced from $174,000 to $124,000. Because of this, the Harrows Channel seawall repair and possibly either Seton Channel seawall repair and /or St. Albans Channel dredging, may be postponed for at least 1991. 12. Request to Sell Ice Crean on the Lake Reese reported Steve Chase has asked about selling ice cream and other food items on the Lake. The Code prohibits selling of food from a watercraft. Chase stated in a phone call he intends to send in a formal request. 13. Adjournment Bjorlin moved, Grathwol seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 5:28 p.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE: Eugene Strommen, Executive Director • Robert Pillsbury, Chair 607 4 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION February 26. 1991 Those present were: Commissioners Bill Meyer, Chair; Geoff Michael; Jerry Clapsaddle; Frank Weiland; Michael Mueller; Bill Voss; and *Mark Manus; Liz Jensen, Council Representative; Jon Sutherland, Building Official; Ed Shukie, City Manager; and Peggy James, Secretary. Absent and excused was Commissioner Bill Thal. The following citizens were in attendance: David and Anne Marle Langrud and Richard Schaad. Chair Meyer called the regular meeting to order at 7 :34 p.m. " I "MS S The February 11, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes were presented for changes and /or additions. MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Mueller, to approve the February 11, 1991 Plaming Commission Minutes as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. YARD SETBAOC, Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicants request for a variance to allow remodeling of the existing dwelI- Ing which will extend the life of the structure. According to a certificate of survey dated June 3. 1947, there are three noncon- formitles with this property 1) the lot area is 4,488 square feet, 2 ) the north s i d e yard has a setback of 8.5 feet, and 3 ) the south side setback is 5.7 feet. The R -2 zone requires a min - imum lot area of 6,000 square feet, and side yard setbacks of 6 feet and that a 10 foot iccess to garage site be shown. The Building Official commented that the existing dwelling is substandard throughout with the only exception that the founda- tion portion that can be visually Inspected appears to be sound. Staff recommended approval of the variance as requested to afford the property owner reasonable use of his land, subject to com- pliance with the following conditions: I) The complete craw, space be excavated to provide for adequate air c'. # l at i on around the floor ,joist system. UBC Section 25 W a) requires a minimum of 18" to the bottom of wood Joists or a minimum of 12" to the bottom of girders. 2) The crawl space be ventilated by an approved mechanical means per UBC Section 2516 (a). 3) Any exterior wall or ceiling that is modified and has plaster, Gypsum board or siding removed is to be insulated to current energy code for Its specific component. Planning Commission Minutes February 2 1991 Page 2 4) A heat lost caICuIatIov by a qualified mechanical contractor shall be submitted. 5) The central heating plant be thoroughly inspected and checked for proper operation by a qualified mechanical con- tractor who will supply a house heating test record form as supplied by the Building Official. Properly sized duct work for supply and return air must be provided to each portion/ room of the house. 6) Included, but adequately addressed within the Building Code, that any and ail structural modifications be properly designed and installed. 7) That all other aspects of the building that are mcdified be brought Into compliance with current code as requdred by the Building Official. The Building Official confirmed that according to City records, the frost footings and foundation under the entire structure, in- cluding the porch. was replaced in 1966. in addition, a variance was granted in 1976, Resolution No. 76 -418 granting a lot size variance of 1,512 square feet with the following stipulations: " all side yards and setbacks are met, a garage be included and structure brought up to code." Jensen expressed a concern that there Is no room for a garage. The applicant. Dave Langrud explained to the Commission that he purchased the house knowing he would have to fix it up. He plans on putting a shed in the rear yard. Michael. who resides next door to the subject property, reviewed the history of it. He explained that after the variance was granted In 1976 the owner realized it would be too expensive to bring it up to code, and therefore, never worked on the struc- ture. Minimum work has been done on the structure since. Michael has watched this structure deteriorate for the last 13 years. He wou l d be i n favor of see i ng I t f i xed up rather than watch It continue to deteriorate, however, he would prefer that it be torn down. Voss questioned If there is a way the city could get guarantee that the improvements would be completed. He is also concerned that there is no garage, and If a garage were constructed it would require a variance. Voss is in favor of seeing the struc- ture demolished. Voss referred to the intent of the Comprehen- sive Plan related to residential redevelopment goals which is focused more on reducing density and Intensity. 609 Planning Coemmisslon Minutes February 25, 1991 Page 3 U Mueller commented that we need to deal with houses on undersized lots, and maybe a way to deal with the problem is through a Hous- ing Maintenance Code. Mueller questioned the possibility of requiring a performance bond to ensure that the work is completed to code, but he also felt this may be an aggressive measure. Mueller Is also concerned with the garage issue and feels a garage site should be shown. MOTION made by Voss seconded by Jensen to recommend denial of the variance. Jensen commented that the structure will require a considerable amount of work, and it may be best to reconstruct the house using the existing footings. A variance would still be required for a garage and only a minimum size garage could be constructed, also, the access to the rear of the lot is too arrow. Jensen also commented that she heard the applicants say _hey plan to improve the structure and then sell it. In addition, construction was started without a permit, and people should check with the City prior to purchasing building materials. Anne Marie Langrud commented that they plan to live in the house until they start a family, since it is not big enough for that now. Mueller commented that since there is not adequate access to a garage site and a variance would be required due to the lot size, maybe a variance should not be granted for a garage, now or in the future. Clapsaddle commented that this structure would probably not be condemned as it stands today. it would probably sit there, if a variance was not approved, and continue to deteriorate. He does not feel a garage is feasible for this site. He argued that the Comprehensive Plan does not give them any way to resolve the problems with these types of properties, and until there is a way to resolve these problems , how can we prevent or keep people from using these properties. This structure is a habitable space, and allowing these people to fix it is better than letting Is rot. City Planner, Mark Koegier, stated that due to the history of this property, Including a new foundation in 1966. a variance in 1976, and the fact that other miscellaneous permits for minor repairs have been granted since then, the City does not have a lot of options, the variance almost has to be granted. He agrees that a way to resolve these properties needs to be developed. Mueller called for the question. Z/40 Planning Commission Minutes February 25. 1991 Page 4 • Those In favor of the motion for denial were: Jensen and Voss. Those opposed to the motion for denial were: Clapsaddle. Mueller, Meyer. Hanus and Michaei. Motion for denial failed with 2 in favor and 5 opposed.] CIapsaddIe questioned the applicant about his intent for a shed. Mr. langrud stated he would like a 12' x 14' shed. Staff clarified that a variance would not be required for a shed which does not exceed 120 square feet in area. Voss commented that he would like to get the City Attorney's opinion on whether the city co',ld get some type of security agreement from the applicant to ensure that the proposed Improve- ments are completed. MOTION made by Voss to table the variance request until an opinion is obtained from the City Attorney with regards to the ability of obtaining a performance bond or some other type of guarantee. Motion failed due to lack of a second. MOTION We by Mueller, seconded by Ciapsaddle to ap- prove the variance request as recomwnded by staff in- ciuding conditions I through 7 with the following stipulations: 1) A current certificate of survey be provided showing the building location and setbacks from the lot lines. 2) No variance for a garage be granted in the future die to the lot size. 3) The City Attorney review the possibiifty of requir- ing a letter of credit or performance bond to en- sure the work is completed: and, if the project is not finished, what recourse would the City have. Motion carried with 5 in favor, 2 opposed. Those In favor were: Mueller, Clapsaddle, Meyer, Hanus and Michael. Those opposed were: Jensen and Voss. The Planning Commission would like to be advised of the City Attorney's response to number 3 in the motion above. Mueller commented that the Comprehensive Plan does not give an alternative to an undersized lot with a structure on it that has not be destroyed 50%. Clapsaddle added that there Is no vehicle to show that the owner has been properly advised of probiems with their properties. The Owner should not be held responsible for information they do not have. T h i s case w i l l be hea - d by the City Counc i i on February 26. 1991 .Z'/ Planning Commission Minutes February 25. 1991 Page 5 Zoning Code Modifications. The City Planner, Mark Koegler, explained that he did not propose to review each and every Item in his report, however. he is open to any comments the Commission may have on any item. Terraces ( #16) Koegler questioned the Commission's intent relat- ing to terraces. He referred to two other city's regulations re- lated to setback requirements for terraces, uncovered porches, unenciosed decks, etc. Current Zoning code requirements and building permit requirements were reviewed. Staff clarified that if a deck is less than 30 inches from grade. and detached from the house, a permit is not required. Any deck less than 30" from grade may be constructed 2 feet from any property line. There was concern expressed about the front yard setback. 2 feet Is too close. Mueller was In favor of allowing a terrace to encroach into the required setbacks by 501, but the 50 foot Lakeshore setback should be maintained. The other commissioner's did not disagree with this concept. Corner and Triangle Lots ( #17) Koegler questioned concerns about setback requirements. He referred to Minnetonka's ordinance and pointed out statements for discussion purposes which gives the Planning director some flexibility in regulating setbacks for corner lots: "in the case of corner lots, the rear lot line shall be determined by the director of planning based upon characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood." And, "On double frontage lots, the setback may be reduced by 10 feet towards the direction perceived by the director of planning to be the rear yard." Mueller questioned if corner lot issues should not be handled on a case -by -case basis. Voss would like to leave the ordinance as is, however, give the Building Official standards for regulating. Those Commissioner's who would like to see the ordinance remain as is and determine on a case -by -case basis were: Hanus. Michael and Meyer. Those Commissioner's who felt a more lenient ordinance should be adopted were: Clapsaddle, Mueller, Liz and Voss. Fish House Storage ( #22) The Commission determined that only one fish house should he allowed per property, and they are In favor of having the owner's name and address displayed on the fish house. n • n Accessory Bui_Id L_qq ( #15) Mueller commented that he is in favor �/ of addressing attached garages versus detached garages. Planning Commission Minutes February 25, 1991 Page 6 Mi nimum Rot Si ze — Requirement for N Subdivis ( #23) Meyer commented that he would like to see any newly created lot in Mound have a minimum lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet. Michael and Voss did not agree, they feel 6.000 square feet is adequate for single family dwellings. Being 11:00 p.m.. Voss moved, and Mueller seconded a mo- tion to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanim- ously. Chair, Bill Meyer Attest: • • 4/J Nation's Cities Weekly February 25, 1941 Cable reform achiwv►able: AWor finds it needs your support Status of Cable TV to n IN NLC, the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the National Aala000eior of Counties are seeking federal legislation that responds to local - i prablims wok callile television. Such legislation mould include ability to set cum boar✓ serorcu stand. ards, a meaningful renewal process that allows for commVefteiak ability to regulate abusive rates and ability to establish up- to- dalatr indla ieal stoeadaards. Several legislative proposals have already ban i "d am are expected as Congress reopens the debate on cable teteoismiar rqulation. Local officials are encouraged to keep up the pressure on their eves representatives to enact meaningful cable reform. by Dave Karp Recently, 1 attended the United States Conference of Mayors Winter Meeting seeking protection for my citizens from the unregulated monopoly of cable TV service. Congressional offices and the FCC informed me that I was the first local rkcted official they had seen on the cable issue. Obviously, this was not a comfort- ing response. I realized that as a member of the United States Conference of May- ors and the National League of Cities it is time to educate and involve my col- leagues in this legislation. I am comforted to know that recently both Sen. Gore and Rep. Stark have voiced strong statements about the lack of actions taken to reregulate cable companies, and that "Cable television customers are being gouged and current law tells the cable companies it's OK to be a thief." (Sen. Gore's statement) Since passage of the Cable Communi- cations Policy Act of 1984, which prohib- ited telephone companies from compet- ing with cable and government regulation of cable TV rates, except in the absence of effective competition, (deter- mined by the FCC to be three over the air channels), cable has been an unregulated monopoly. But in cable TV hearings over the past two years, local government has all too often been the one to come out with a black eye. Cable TV companies and some members of Congress have testified that it was the local governments practice of awarding only one franchise that is the root of consumers problems today. I d- kniglint it was, time to set the record oIt Dad driven by the need to have Coa.gaesa arid the FCC protect my c on- . I arrived in Waahi um a day ea"y Aw ells year's USCM's Winter Metseeia a W god was to"iegislatiort ehasmr wM mrisisleet with the Conference of tiiif�rss and Natiorml Leagued Cities MYy s•eaW was simple. Cable TV is air wed aonopoly these has no u�ceeea w d be responsive to consumer bntamodan and artgts about poor service ar&d boeasing ales. Local telephone eoreeI ries are Se only logical dterna- tive++trtltit Irss due lecirreaiogYand 6nanciat rcreromsas sues eoiP ere. By permriftig my locaial 211i0ho" campWY to compete wifth my bed cable TV campany, while ertsrtmaiag my aba'61, y to franchise all able TV - seaiice providtrs, the Covina could proaovsde MY amrratets with choice. Leg - blatr amst also return to local govern- be sight to regulate cable TV rates in t.. iAw abwnce of an alternative multi- duarurd provider✓ not "effective compe- titioror' as defined by the FCC. lair s6C,on to meeting with my own Cnrur�an, I stet with FCC Chairman Al S:Siim. Commissioners Andrew Barrett and°,d L rn± Duggan and the senior staff of the r H uw and Senate Commerce Com. mitctzr_ u tick have oversight mspon- sibditiran i w cable. Or-'r "ch of my stops I was informed just is nrw dose Congress came to passing cabiett : V 3egtislation last year, and just how:+ ittie support and contact they had recetternr 'm local elected of$ciab. They apps the support of the Confer - en't a"d League staff, but repeated that the rrmmW had to be delivered mayor to mernamer I pCOMbed them that this year woukrie be ddetertt. • C • On this page is listed the members of the two Congressional Commerce Com- mittees. They will decide whether and what kind of cable TV legislation is passed in the 102nd Congress. A letter, a call, a copy of a city resolution calling upon the Congress to address the lack of both competition and regulation in cable TV to one of these members would bear much fruit. A personal visit to any of these members while you are in Wash- ington for a Conference or League func- tion will be even more valuable. Despite all claims to the contrary, cable TV legislation is very achievable this year. And it an be legislation that is consistent with the position of the Con- ference and League. We can open cable TV to competition from telephone com- panies and we can have regulation, if the Congress receives our support. Local government is very fortunate in that we have Tucson Mayor Tom Volgy as our spokesperson on able TV issues. But for too long we have all looked to Tom to carry on this fraht alone. I hope You join in, we can not win without you. I have included a five step process that I plan on implementing in my city of San Leandro and would suggest that you consider using it in your city. ❑ Members of Senate, House Commerce Committees SENATE Ted Stevens. Alaska; John McCain, Aril.; Daniel K. Inouye, Hawaii; Wendell H. Ford, Ky.; John B. Breaux, La.; John F. Kerry, Mass.; Trent Lott, Miss.; John C. Danforth, Mo.; Conrad Burns, Mont.; J. James Exon, Neb.; Richard H. Bryan, Nev.; Bob Packwood, Ore.; Emest F. Hollings, S.C.; Lary Pressler, S.D.; Al- bert Gore, Tenn.; Lloyd Bentsen, Tex.; Charles Robb, Va.; Slade Gorton, Wash.; Jay Rockefeller, W.Va., and Robert Kas- ten, Wisc. • HOUSE SonnY Callahan, District 1, AAla -; Car- los Moorhead, District 22, Calif.:.; Fey Waxman, District 24, Calif.; . Wiliam Dannemeyer, District 39, C..aWlif ; D Schaefer, District 6, Colo.; , Miitaei Barakis, District 9, Fla., I. Roy Rcitowynt District 8, Ga.; Cardiss Collins, DDist= ; Ill_; Edward Madigan, District 25 W: ferry Bruce. District 19, Ill.; : V%l Sharp, District 2, Ind,; Jim Slatte-rrt ?ss- trict 2, Kan_; W. J. Taurin. Distnc-- ; u. Edward Markey, District 7, M iss ; c h a Dingell, District 16, !dich.; Germ - 7ior- ski, District 6, Minn., Matthew p:i!imido. District 7, N.J.; Bill Richardson, Dirac: 3. N.M ; Noman Lent, District tv. Y. James Scheuer, District 8, N.Y.; °Tomas Manton. District 9, N.Y.; J. Alex % M, -Ai:- Ian, District 9, N.C.; Michael Oxle %te% : is- trict 4, Ohio; Dennis Eckart. Disttsmiz ; I Ohio; Mike Synar, District 2, Okla:� Ron Wyden, District 3, Oregon; Ud" lit- ter, District 15, Pa.; Jim Cooper, Dismal- 4, Tenn.; Ralph Hall, District 4, Tex irirn Bryant, District 5, Tex,; Joe Bartamr...ts- trict 6, Tex; Jack Fields, District # ; 'I■_r; Thomas Bliley, District 3, Va.; Rick;i. liru- cher, District 9, Va.; Al Swift, Dish Wash. FCC Commissioners Alfred Sikes, chain un; Commisessnme- James Quello, Commissioner :�inar;e Marshall, Commissioner Andrew 6 Bue.� Commissioner Ervin Duggan, Address for an Commissioners: 1919 M Street NW Was ' " 20554 O ['at +e Karp is mayor of San Leanar.a -c. How to launch a grassroots efibon Mayor Karp's ideas for a cable TV grassroots effort: 1. Enact a city resolution on cable TV or issue a mayoral proclarnattr=cn mir the Conference of Mayors and National League of Cities policy stater:,ens a ar -. : ific models. L Hold a town hearing on cable TV service and invite your C�_+ -ts ►coal delegation, if they can't appear in person, video tape the proceedings a, arc ant them with the tape. 3. Forward a copy of your talks and or city resolution to each of the rr menc*--s of your Congressional delegation, as well as members of the House , an: mate Commerce Committees and the FCC Commissioners, a list of which r, i= ar~�ied. 4. Visit these leaders when you are in Washington. S. Involve your local press in the issue. Nothing gamers Congressnonaria fr *e - .:)on like a local news story. O d /s' League of Minnesota Cities 1991 Legislative ConfeErence Wednesday, April 10,11991 Radisson Hotel, St. Pawd Agenda 9:30 -l" a.m. Property Tax tssimsm Radisson Hotel "The Amazing During Act Local Government Akio toZbes" • Rep. Paul Ogrewr v Senator Doug lciohtmo s l l:00-Noon Capitd Ragy, CLWM Rotunda (LIV1C will provide dk=M a lusts) City officials wiilillk W and respond to legislative view powmac aacroing funding for cities Rer. Robert Vaanud • Rep. Terry Dempar+ Senator Roger MM ne Senator Duane Bdt inoa 12:30.1:45 p.m. Lumcbees, RadMe datel (LMC will provide sbutile boomw Wbem do cities stated width the Carlson administration? WWi11Gosernor Carlson introduce an alternative to L GrA? v Governor Aroaf Denson 2:00 p.m. Concurrent Sesni*an 't Protection of tiA --1U League supports modifyinn ad i ceasing existing governmental protection of wetl"rsit resources --does the Legislature age! • Senator Cbud cMrAis Ron Nargar& UNfinnesota Department of Natural Resonmrces Transportafiowiahnats in Minnesota — funding and 1 and State • CommissionerkJolls Riley. Department of Transportatiom • Senator Ke tb Liznp� v Rep. Henry KaWn 3:30 -5:00 p.m. Ciassifkatka ItUam -What changes should the slate marline it p operty tax rates for low, middk, and bight. -dhe domes. rental housing, and corrwouz=i f- isidustrial property? What do legislators predictct sKii actually happen, in light of the stanae't budget deficit? Rep. Kathleen ft Bin 9 Rep. Alan Welidic • Senator David Pfudenckson • Senator Huber tr kmbgon Pre" MW Pria naaryAtedistrkting- -Who will pick up u.tt ab for the price of the presidential primary? Will thex :egislature have redistricting boundane3es Inkskd by 1992! • Secretary of Start )no Anderson -Growe • Rep. Linda Scbea cat 5:15.7:30 p.m. Rteeptioo for Cllr• ORklals and Legislators • Invited to speak 414 Page 10 PrWeion recrckd paper LMC Cities Bulletin LMC M LegbWWtive Conference Wednesday, Apawil 10 M Radisson SL Pamul Hotel 11 East Kellogg BhxL St. Paul, Minnemotil 55101 Registrattion City Name Name Title - Title (Please print or r type) Name Title Registration fee: $70.00DO aiSaince Advance Regmistration $90.00DO om•=- E Deadline--Apriril 3, 1991 Check eDckmW in the a:xm= of S Fee Includes eoaftresence mtharation, luncheon, and evening receptDtim with legislators invited. Mail to League of N11 innesewu Cities 183 University Avenumut East St. Paul, M% 5516101 * * 00 00000 90 oo*** 800000** 0 ** **see * MUCIF.Am Hotel at. Paul DON'T FORGET; -- Make cbect or mmunco order psysbic to Radmossm marl SL N.L Do w ww curnommm ORGAMNIZA"ZION Izagm of Mi nne.rt. MiCTMIM 1991 lxxj jmliye coremme tATES AgW9.10 1991 All SAGE REMPOR M ADOWCO" MM re RWtrjW By Awl it 1991 %� now" smanowdmikas to km Lm #MEN= C* 2UNI& mm .0 11 m"A OW Tw &J"Wel D200 sww zip Cc& %. .1 Pp." - F%ww Smix - CHBCX2-1Y71 3:00 p.m CRErX C O'_7 IMNE 12 00 p. m AcoommodKiom wig no be waxhmwd without a coed for the IN night's dePou cr us— vmr kmex or Diners Club aedit card number so gummervue Maur mmeryukaYam will be dsszge=ad fw:br IN night if M"Lims are m canceled 48 bowam P-m to affival. Cw" ad 1 0 Am, 0 D(m. O► 0 VW C: h6mmotow 4*w O%w chmk smi Sp*cW Redwed RALm for mememme s onq POW w Tyyw LqIIC w sLmgk US Doubk (2 people) March 1, 1"1 PrWed on recNkd ot sAwr Pit-It 4100 veo erjer" �owtk IL t Poo w" 55416 well is hessepple L 9!0+5533 hvwose [twitter March 4, 1991 RECD MAR 6 ; Dear Municipal Officials: As-s pzrt of work in undertaking community needs and demographics, West Hennnepgn Human Services Planning Board intends to compile and analyze 1990 U.S. C :Census data. We will be sending municipalities reports of this new data as it becorrmes available. Ennclosed is our fast report which is the population figures by race of each munidcip d4 in Hennepin County. Please note that the report is divided into two parts:;: I* 1. percentage of total population. ?. percentage change from 1980 to 1990 and the population figures for each category. I hhope this information will be useful to you. Sincerely, Marcy Shapiro Executive Directs,: `l8' we* h e nn wph buinan sautes: ptannin9 board 4100 wrno w avenue south, 9L louts park, mkmesota 55416 "-I rseetpir il�aea !e�titt� I "1 Census Figures by Race 0 of all Hennepin County Municipalites Prepared by WeQst Hennepin Human Seni Planning Board March 1, 1991 l/7 A 3a O HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES CENSUS FIGURES BY RACE PERCENT OF TOTAL POPULATION TOTAL WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER HISPANIC 3-OOMINGTON 1980 81,831 97.11% 0.862 0.22% 1.47! 0.342 0.54% 1990 86,335 94.71% 1.61% 0.29% 3.09% 0.30% 0.93% iROOKLYN CENTER 1980 31,230 96.01% 1.70% 0.64% 0.95% 0.70% 0.87% 1990 28,887 90.94% 5.20% 0.941 2.31% 0.612 1.27% 3ROOKLYN PARK 1980 43,332 95.652 1.94% 0.39% 1.421 0.601 0.92% 1990 56,381 90.60% 4.94% 0.62% 3.401 0.45% 1.15% :;EA.4PL1 1980 9,006 98.70% 0.19% 0.48% 0.532 0.101 0.442 1990 16,849 98.05% 0.39% 0.53% 0.79% 0.24% 0.781 :ORCORAN 1980 4,252 98.92% 0.02% 0.33% 0.42% 0.311 0.31% 1990 5,199 98.622 0.17% 0.42% 0.58% 0.21% 0.52% :RYSTAL 1980 25,543 97.72% 0.60% 0.47% 8.32% 0.372 0.662 1990 23,788 95.302 1.82% 0.612 1.852 0.44% 0.95% :AYTON 1980 4,07(1 96.951 0.17% 0.42% 0.52% 0.222 0.421 1990 4,443 97.82% 0.272 0.92% 0.921 0.07% 0.342 TEEPHAYEN 1980 3,716 98.79% 0.052 0.22% 0.73% 0.22% 0.51% 1990 3,653 98.30% 0.25% 0.08% 1.37% 0.002 0.30% DEN PRAIRIE 1980 16,263 97.82% 0.57% 0.221 1.242 0.151 0.582 1990 39,311 96.38% 1.12% 0.18% 2.09% 0.22% 0.70% DINA 1980 46,073 98.392 0.51% G.092 0.71% 0.292 0.48% 1990 46,070 97.19% 0.722 0.14% 1.73% 0.222 0.712 xCELSIOR 1980 2,523 97.78% 0.202 0.241 1.63% 0.16% 0.08% 1990 2,367 97.932 0.25% 0.302 1.35% 0.17% 1.312 PREPARED BY WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES SOURCE: 1990 U.S. CENSUS 0 0 0 GOLDEN VALLEY GREENFIELD GREEM"D HANOVER tiOPKINS INOEf ENDENCE 1.0':G LAKE LOR.Tlo MAPLE GROVE MAPLE PLAIN ME D? NA N TOTAL WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER HISPANIC- 1960 22,775 96.712 1.49% 0.16% 1.19% 0.442 0.47% 1990 20.971 94.71% 2.68% 0.23% 2.08% 0.29% 0.97% 1960 1,391 98.92% 0.147 0.36% 0.50% 0,61% 0.072 1990 1,450 99.17% 0.14% 0.07% 0.41% 0.21% 0.14% :980 653 99.39% 0.00% 0.00% 0.61% 0.00% 0.00% 1990 614 98.53% 0.00% 0.16% 0.98% 0.33% 0.332 1980 248 97.98% 0.00% u.)0% "0.40% 1.61% 2.02% 1990 787 98.98% 0.00% 0.13% 0.64% 0.25% 0.89% 1980 15,336 97.70% 0.61% 0.21% 1.13% 0.35% 0.70% 1990 16,534 95.23% 1.54% 0.542 2.262 0.44% 1.16% 1980 2,640 98.71% 0.11% 0.04% 0.80% 0.34% 0.45% 1990 2,822 98.37% 0.042 0.43% 0.822 0.35% 0.53% 1980 1,747 99.08% 0.06% 0.29% 0.52% 0.06% 0.17% 1990 1,984 98.64% 0.30% 0.25% 0.352 0.45% 0.402 1980 297 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.67% 1990 404 98.02% 0.50% 1.24% 0.002 0.25% 0.74% 1980 20,525 97.94% 0.62% 0.15% 0.95% 0.34% 0.70% 1990 38,736 97.11% 0.87% 0.29; 1.55% 0.18% 0.81% 1980 1,421 99.372 0.07% 0.21% 0.28% 0.07% 0.07% 1990 2,005 98.75% 0.05% 0.55% 0.30% 0.352 0.65% 180 419 98.09% 0.24 %. 0.48% 1.19% 0.00% 0.48% 1990 385 98.18% 1.30% 0.00% 0.52% 0.00% 0.262 1980 2,623 99.167, 0.15% 0.15% 0.46% 0.08% 0.46% 1990 3,096 98.29% 0.42% 0.32% 0.81% 0.16% 0.68% 9 9 0 TOTAL WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER HISPANIC MINNEAPOLIS 1980 370,951 V.30% 7.66% 2.412 1,11% 1.52% 1.261 1990 368,383 78.44% 13.021 3.35% 4.27% 0.932 2.14% MINNETONKA 1980 38,683 98.35% 0.42% 0.172 0.78% 0.262 0.50% 1990 48,370 97.062 0.921 0.182 1.59% 0.262 0.812 MINNETONKA BEACH 1980 575 98.782 0.17% 0.17% 0.70% 0.172 0.17% 1990 373 98.431 0.001 0.35% 1.22% 0.002 0.70% MINNETRISTA 1980 3,236 98.641 0.12% 0.06% 0.77% 0.402 0.31% 1990 3,439 99.102 0.15% 0.062 0.64% 0.062 0.44% MOUND 1980 9,280 98.14% 0.29% 0.45% 0.86% 0.262 0.64% 1990 9,634 97.64% 0.48% 0.322 1.36% 0.20% 0.692 NEW HOPE 1980 23,087 97.55% 0.84% 0.33% 0.87% 0.412 0.69% 1990 21,853 94.741 2.46% 0.54% 1.96% 0.28% 1.06% ORONO 1980 6,845 99.04% 0.13% 0.26% 0.312 0.262 0.472 1990 7,285 98.34% 0.381' 0.25% 0.75% 0.27% 0.802 OSSEO 1980 2,974 98.22% 0.0 1 % 0.27% 0.67% 0.771 1,21% 1990 2,704 98.93% 0.26% 0.15% 0,33% 0.33% 0.78% PLYMOUTH 1980 31,615 97.13% 1.112 0.391 1.05% 0.322 0.52% 1990 50,889 95.66% 1.61% 0.36% 2.041 0.32% 1.02% RICHFIELD 1980 37,851 97,49% 0.81% 0.19% 1. (lilt 0.492 0.55% 1990 35,710 93,49% 2.61% 0.61% 2.811 0.48% 1.07% ROBBINSDALE 1980 14,422 98.61% 0.44% 0.26% 0.42% 0.27% 0.42% 1990 14,396 96.192 1.73% 0.58% 1.192 0.31% 0.912 ROCKFM; 1980 380 99.47% 0.00% 0.262 0.002 0.26% 2.63% 1990 2,665 98.01% 0.45% 0.83% 0.38% 0.342 0.642 9 9 0 TOTAL 64117E BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER HISPANIC ROG£RS 1980 652 99.85% 0.00% 0.00% 0.15% C. 00% 0.15% 1990 698 98.71% 0.00% 0.29% 0.14% 0.n(l 1.43% ST. .YTii0f1% 1980 7,981 97.17% 0.30% 0.16% 1.75% 0.61% 0.54% 1990 7.808 96.26% 0.74% 0.31% 2.39% 0.29% 0.93% S1. 80NIFACIUS 1980 857 99.77 0.00% 0.00% 0.23% 0.00% 0.35% 1990 1.180 98.14% 0.06% 1.19% 0.51% 0.D8% 0.34% S'. LOINS PARK 1980 42,931 97.90% 0.56% 0.24% 1.04% 0.26% 0.57% 1990 43,787 95.26% 1.89% 0.41% 2.10% 0.34% 1.03% Sii0RErk")D 1980 4,646 98.62% 0.26% 0.19% 0.62% 0.30% 0.39% 1990 5,917 97.807 0.59% 0.03% 1.32% 0.25% 0.85% SPRING PARK 1980 1,465 99.11% 0.01% 0.14% 0.61% 0.07% 0.412 1990 1,574 98.28% 0.38% 0.327. 0.83% 0.00% 0.25% TONKA BAY 1980 1,354 99.11% 0.07% 0.37% 0.07% 0.372 0.89% 1990 1,472 98.98% 0.27% 0.14% 0.54% 0.07% 1.09% WAYZAIA ;980 3.621 99.09% 0.08% 0.08% 0.61% 0.142 0.36% 1990 3,806 98.21% 0.55.% 0.08% 0.97% 0.18% 0,92% WOODLAND 1980 526 99.24% 1.52% 0.19% 0.38% 0.19% 0.19% 1990 496 98.79% 0.00% 0.00% 0.812 0.40% 0.60% d� SCENT CFLANGE FRUM 1980 TO 1990 •:ul Iagn IOTAL MIITE BLACK 1'JJl! 4,44.1 v lb% 4,34 lo. 1 PHP.vEN 1980 3,716 3,671 34.03% 668 1990 t -1.70% 102 -2.18% 4 PRAIRIE ! 7911 trr,, 11 . �. rnt it I , mr, W, qu% 1, 94 99, rill .)OKLYN CENTER 1980 31,230 138.18% 29,984 1980 530 45,333 1990 28,887 -7.50% 26,271 - 12.38% 1,502 183.40% A.)QYN PARK 1980 43,332 - 79.34% 41,448 840 19 2,367 1990 56,381 30.11% 51,079 23.24% 2,785 2.31.55% LIN 1980 9,006 8,889 17 1990 16,849 87.092 16,521 85.86% 65 282,35% LORAN 198C 4,252 4,206 1 1990 5,199 22.272 5,127 21.90% 9 800.00% 0;TA! 1980 25,543 24,961 152 1990 23,7811 41.81% 22,669 -9.18% 432 184.21% •:ul Iagn 4,IlIto 1,p4r. I ,:''1.1 1'JJl! 4,44.1 v lb% 4,34 lo. 1 PHP.vEN 1980 3,716 3,671 34.03% 668 1990 3,653 -1.70% 3,591 -2.18% 4 PRAIRIE 1900 16,263 212.05% 15,908 48 1990 39,311 141.72% 37,889 138.18% NA 1980 46,073 45,333 57.14% 30 1990 46,070 -0.01% 44,774 -1.23% LSi�1R 19130 2.523 - 79.34% 2,467 19 2,367 -6.18% 2,318 -6.04% 0 E INDIAN ASIAN 1341 1 : ,_1 1 I ,:''1.1 7411 14. Till P, r,Gq 121, MIX 201 296 271 34.03% 668 125.68% 170 614 348 104.71% 1,916 212.05% 43 48 90 109.30% 133 177.089 14 18 22 57.14% 30 66.67% 121 2,125 144 19.012 439 - 79.34% 7 11 12 11,43X 41 141.18% 2 8 9 350.001 3 - 62.502 92 36 440 378.25% 71 97.22% 235 43 333 41.70% 65 51.16% 5 6 6 20.002 7 16.67% 9 21 41 !!b.l4X 27 50 85.19% 202 823 307.432 327 796 143.43% 41 32 - 21.95% OTHER J!! 219 175 - 20.09% 260 253 -2.69% 9 40 344.44% 13 11 - 15.38% 94 104 10,642 0 J bb. b 1% 8 0 - 100.00% 25 88 252.00% 135 102 - 24.442 4 4 0,00% UISPANIC 451 At 14 A1, !2% 273 367 34.43% 400 650 62.50% 40 132 230.00% 13 27 107.69% 169 227 34.32% 17 15 - 11.76% 19 11 - 42.11% 94 275 192.55% 220 327 48.64% 2 31 1450.00% 0 :'.._:.EY Ie:L0 !r:1VER `):: !i 5 :' I'I Ni`! PA.f I A11 E GROVE ;'t E PLAN a� N h • 1N01AN TOTAL ASIAN MUTE 36 Bt A K 272 1950 22,775 36,11% 22,026 60.66% 349 200.002 1990 20,971 -7.92% 19,861 -9.83% 553 65.59% I9E30 1,391 ERR 1,376 ERR 2 50.00% 1990 1,450 4.24% 1,438 4.51% 2 0.00% 19BO 653 37.74% 649 76.85% 0 178.13% 1990 614 - 5.97% 605 -6,78% 0 ERR 1960 248 243 Ilu�1 0 1GG,GlX 1990 787 217.34% 779 220.58% 0 ERR I WO 15.336 ERR 14, 99.1 ERR 93 0.00% 19.1") 16,534 7.81% 15,745 5.011% 254 173.12% 19(io 2,640 1200.002 2,606 266.67% 3 50.00% 1 �lJJ ?,iI "." 6.0A 2. 116 G.f'% 1 66.6'12 1'lil! t, !1/ 1 5x/. uu% 1,111 75.00X I fail. ut)% t' i,vr11 I 1.,1L I,1'J Il.nr.>; h 'dnl_UnL 1980 297 297 0 1990 404 36.03% 396 33.33% 2 ERR 1980 20,525 20,103 128 1990 38,736 88.73% 37,615 87.11% 337 163.28% 1990 1,421 1,412 1 1990 2,005 41.10% 1,980 40.23% 1 0,00% 1,40 419 •111 1 19 3115 -8.11% 318 -11.03% 5 400.00% U7G itl. 1) 1( ], U41 Io.7JX i 7 115. UU% • 1N01AN ASIAN 36 - 39.60% 272 87.96% 49 36,11% 437 60.66% 5 200.002 7 100.00% 1 - 80.00% 6 - 14.29% 0 ERR 4 ERR 1 ERR 6 50.00% 0 - 50.002 1 10.00% 1 ERR 5 400.00% 32 37.74% 174 76.85% 89 178.13% 313 114,37% 1 11.11% 21 25.00% 12 1100.002 21 . Ilu�1 7 1GG,GlX 0 2 0 ERR 0 50,002 5 ERR 0 ERR 30 0.00% 194 118.062 113 276.672 601 209.79% 3 600.002 4 1200.002 11 266.67% 6 50.00% 2 ERR 5 - 50.00% 0 - 100.00% 2 - 60.00% I 1 5x/. uu% I', 75.00X 11) fail. ut)% [b il,u. _1_)% OTHER HISPANIC 101 108 61 - 39.60% 203 87.96% 1 1 3 200.002 2 100.00% 0 0 2 ERR 2 ERR 4 5 2 - 50.002 7 10.00% 53 108 73 37.74% 191 76.85% 9 12 10 11.11% 15 25.00% I a u Ilu�1 11 1GG,GlX 0 2 1 ERR 3 50,002 70 144 70 0.00% 314 118.062 1 1 7 600.002 13 1200.002 0 2 0 ERR 1 - 50.00% 17 5 1 5x/. uu% 21 75.00X 101A1 MAIL bLACK INDIAN ASIAN O111LR HISPANIC MINNEAPOLIS 1980 370,951 323,832 28,433 8,932 4,104 5,650 4,684 1990 368,383 -0.69% 288,961 - 10.772 47,948 68.64% 12,335 38.102 15,723 283.11% 3,410 - 39.65% 7,900 68.66% MINNETONKA 1980 38,683 38,045 163 65 301 109 193 1990 48,370 25.04% 46,950 23.41% 443 171.782 85 30.77% 767 154.82% 125 14.682 392 103.111 ;rNE'ONKA BEAp1 1980 575 568 1 1 4 1 1 1990 573 -0.35% 564 -0.70% 0 - 100.002 2 100.00% 7 75.00% 0 - 100.002 4 300.00% 'OitIRI! [A 1480 3,236 3,192 4 2 25 13 10 , r.. ?7t 1,4011 41.712 5 25.00% 7 0,1111)2 . ^, 12.nn% 7 114,r91t 15 tul.txl5 '1NrND I4lN1 4,,1111 v, to/ 21 42 flu 24 bo 1990 9,634 3.812 9,407 3.29% 46 70.372 31 - 26.192 131 63.752 19 - 20.83% 66 11.86% , .wlw HOPE 1980 23,087 22,521 193 77 201 95 160 1990 21.853 -5.34% 20,703 -8.07% 542 180.83% 118 53.25% 428 112.94% 62 - 34.74% 232 45.00% JRONO '980 6,845 6,779 9 18 21 18 32 1990 7,285 6.43% 7,164 5.68% 28 211.11% 18 0.00% 55 161.90% 20 11.112 58 81.255 , SSE 0 1980 2,974 2,921 2 8 20 23 36 1990 2,704 -9.08% 2,675 -8.42% 7 250.00% 4 - 50.00% 9 - 55.00% 9 - 60.872 21 - 41.672 = :YMOUTH 1980 31.615 30,707 351 123 333 101 165 1990 50,889 60.96% 48,682 58.542 821 133,90% 185 50.412 1,040 212.31% 161 59,41% 518 213.442 ,. i,r I n ty,u, 9t,gtl 3r, u110 lilt 14 101 144 911111 I790 ito,7iu 5.6o% J3, :W7 -9.53% 932 203.5831 219 200.00% 1,002 160.942 170 -8.111 383 84.135 ,3BBINSDALE 1980 14.422 14,221 63 36 61 39 60 1990 14,396 -0.182 13,847 -2.63% 249 295.241 83 118.422 172 181.97% 45 15.362 131 118.33% 'OCKFORO 1980 380 378 0 1 0 1 10 1990 2,665 601.322 2.512 591.01% 12 ERR 22 2100.005 10 ERR 9 800.002 17 70.002 • X, Y is 0 INDIAN TOTAL fi111 TE BLACK R,S 1980 652 651 0 2 1990 698 7.06% 689 5.842 0 ERR Al:lUJY 1980 7,991 7,755 24 24 1990 7,8C8 -2.17% 7,516 - 3.08% 58 141.672 iaxY f M; IitS 1980 857 855 0 14 1990 1.180 37.692 1.15F1 35,44% 1 FRR tilt 4 I :44 117 177f1 t 7, 107 ! 'J7� 11 71 3 tl Itl C7' C. C11 7 11 aEH(x10 1980 4.616 4,582 12 2 1990 5.917 27.362 5,707 26.30% 35 191.67% ' RING PARK 1980 1.465 1.452 1 5 1990 1,574 7.44% 1.547 6.54% 6 500.00% fA {SAY 1980 1,354 1,342 1 2 1')'10 1,412 8.71% 1,457 8.51% 4 300.00% .1 1'+!1tl 12 5 13 I', 119. " r -1 AN,) 17111! 4 1U0.00% 1 2 Iuu.001 1 3 200.001 I9 4W, 5. Ju% 490 6. 1.1% 0 100,OU1 X, Y is 0 INDIAN ASIAN OTHER HISPANIC 0 1 0 1 2 ERR 1 0.00% 6 ERR 10 900.002 13 140 49 43 24 84.62% 187 33.572 23 - 53.06% 73 69.77% 0 2 0 3 14 IRR 6 200.00% 1 ERR 4 33.331 tilt 4 I :44 117 1: iR• Utl Ine [M 110 11 134 to PC or% 9 29 14 18 2 - 77.78% 78 168.97% 15 7.14% 50 177.78% 2 9 1 6 5 150.002 13 44.44% 0 - 100.00% 4 - 33.33% 5 1 5 12 2 - 60.00% 8 700.00% 1 - 80.00% 16 33.33% .1 12 5 13 I', 119. " i 0 IUu.OU% 4 1U0.00% 1 2 Iuu.001 1 3 200.001 You Are Invited Kick -Off Celebration and Informative Gathering for the Downtown Mound Improvement Project When: Wednesday March 13, 1991 from 5:00 to 7:00 pm. Where: Mound City Hall in the Council Chambers. Sponsors: Mound Economic Development Commission. City of Mound. • The community of Mound has expressed a desire to improve the appearance, convenience and strength of Downtown Mound. 0 The formation of an action oriented, downtown improvement team focussing on business development, design and promotion is the outgrowth of this concern. The Kick -off is a great way to learn about Downtown Mound and become involved in shaping its future. If you have any questions concerning the Downtown Mound Improvement Project contact Bruce Chamberlain (Project Director) at 553 -1950. p.s. Hor d'oeuvres, coffee and soft drinks will be served. 4A1 Please Attend! • 13AFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT :ear Mayor A3 you know, there has been some concern expressed by some of the ctties around Lake Minnetonka that the Long Term Management Plan developed by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District U MCD) is very restrictive, particularly as it pertains to the management Off the cities' shorelands. I attended a meeting of mayors held Wednesday, March 6, 1991, basted by the city of Wayzata, at Wayzata city hall. The meeting arcs initiated to resolve management program issues raised by the e cities in a resolution dated December 6, 1990. I attended tie meeting to express my concern that the eight dissenting c :ties were misinterpreting the purpose of the Long Term Management Plan. I emphasize the word PL9tf. It is net a a:cument etched in stone; it is not a law or ordinance. It is merely a plan. Hence, the City of Mound, which has spent r.:merous hours reviewing it, accepted it as a plan. te City of Mound had some questions and concerns with certain 0 ::eats contained within the plan and expressed those to the LMCD 1 &/ 0? r in a letter dated June 12, 1990, a copy of which is enclosed. It also had a statement read at the June 6 1990 public hearing, a copy of which is enclosed, expressing its concerns with regard to the plan. Last fall, the council after substantial review, agreed to go forward and sign the agreement to work with the LMCD and the Department of Natural Resources on preparing a model shoreland management ordinance for the Lake Minnetonka area. We did this because we wanted to come up with an ordinance that we, as member cities of LMCD, have developed because Lake Minnetonka is a very unique area. We saw this agreement bringing the cities of the LMCD together in working in a cooperative manner in order to fulfill requirements as established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. In order to pursue attaining cooperation, I would like to invite You to attend a weeting on Wednesday,, April 17, 1991 a�t 7 PM at Mound City Hall. Please invite your, councihm`em and a staff people that you feel appropriate to attend. I will be asking the LMCD staff and LMCD representatives from each of the cities, as well as DNR officials to attend. Please RSVP your attendance to Ms. Linda Strong at Mound City Hall on or before April 12, 1991. This is an opportunity for all of us to begin working together on 0 (30 2 a very important program. I hope you agree with me and will attend this meeting. Sincerely, Skip Johnson Mayor of Mound cc: Tom Reese, LMCD Representative John Line Stine, Regional Hydrologist, DNR Mark Koegler, City Planner Gene Strommen, LMCD ES:1 s • 3 131 I June 12, 1990 TF) " of N RVND Dr. David J. Arndorfer Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 402 E. Lake Street Wayzata, NN 55391 Dear Dr. Arndorfer: WC' _ - : ��'�+ . ».. + ' 'is The City Council of the City of Mound, M. nesot&, hasp. speat several hours over the last two months reviewing the Long Term Management Program for Lake Minnetonka that you have prepaarei in cooperation with the LMCD. The City Council began its review of the plan basically oa as Mmge by page basis, and came up with a number of questions aaei /or comments with regard to the plan. As you know, Mayor Steve Smith represented the City of Moaned at the June 6th public hearing at the City of Minnetonka, inn abieh the statement read by Mayor Smith summarized the City of Mromad•s position on the plan. However, Council wanted se to dttmt a letter to you indicating specific questions or comments thairt they had on the various portions of the plan. Therefore, I w 1111 begin by page number within the plan: 1. Page 18, under "Historical Background" indicates that there is a need for 700 car /trailer parking spaces foar Lake Minnetonka. Assuming that the Hennepin Parks Districtt goes forward and builds a regional park on Lake Minnetonkaa, were the spaces created at the park (100 *) going to be coo =ted within the 700 parking spaces? 2. Pages 29 -31, under items 8 -6, 7 -6, 6 -4 and 5 -1. The wword in "review" is used repeatedly. What does *review* mesas in these contexts? How serious are you about these items*? • • 6307. i I:r. David J. Arndorfer June 12, 1990 Page 2 3. On page 21, you indicated present practice by one of the cities on the lake. We understand this to be Mound. Is this correct? If so, on page 28, you indicate: "Accordingly, Lake Minnetonka access and use shall be managed to remain open for all citizens of the state, while riparian landowners have certain constitutional and common law rights of access, no other group shall be recognized as having special privileges or other rights of access.■ Is it the intent that the City of Mound's Commons Dock program should be open to all citizens of the state of Minnesota? 4. Pages 30 -31, items 6 -2 and 5 -4. What do these mean? Is it the intent of the LMCD to eliminate expansion of the City of Mound's municipal dock program? 5. Page 30, item 7 -4. What is the rationale behind "more restrictive frontage -foot rules ?" 6. The City of Mound compliments you on items 8 -10, 8 -11 and 8- 13, on page 30. These are positive statements. 7. Page 30, item 8 -9. Is 24 hour presence of the water patrol necessary all year round? 8. Page 30, item 7 -8. Please clarify the phrase "following day on weekends and holidays." 9. Pages 30 -31. "To implement such an ordinance, the LMCD shall meet with each individual municipality to determine the classification of the near shore waters of the lake. It is conceived that the classifications adopted would be that of the city. The known excepticn would be the manufacturing district in one city on the lake." Which city Is this? 10. Page 32, the statement "future public access points shall utilize remote and shuttles as appropriate." How is this going to be paid for? 11. Page 35, regarding the regulation of ice houses. The City of Mound supports the LMCD on this item as it is a great need at the present time. 0 12. Page 42, item 13, is excellent. 13. Page 44, item #4. We compliment you on this item. X33 Mr. David J. Arndorffer June 12, 1990 Page 3 14. Page 57, item i115. On page 42, referrerce is made to the word "manpower'" under item i1. This word should be made gender neutral. There may be other reieferences to manpower through the repoert that should be changeed. 16. Page 399 last pparagrrit4l seems to be ovverstating the use of law enforcement- agencies for the lake. The Board of Peace Officer Standaerds and Training licensees peace officers in the state of MiAnaesota. We don't beliaeve that it dictates how many positiaons there should be in each law enforcement unit. That iss usually up to the ccity where the law enforcement agenacy is located. 17. Page 41. Typogl!ra;ybical error on the lisating of items. 18. Page 50, 4th pearagraph. References thee Excelsior Commons. It states that "'axly the Commons has that capacity to serve a significant reg$lanal population." Iia this referencing Excelsior Commonn3l If so, it should bey: stated as such. 19 g . Page 51. That statement is ■adet :: *The LMCD ha39 legislatively- onaidated responsibillty.y for public water - oriented shorelilne recreational opportum lties on the lake.• Is this true? 21. Page 51. The :statement is made: 'IrTbe Lake Minnetonka Conservation DDistrict has leg13lattlVe authority over shoreline use asnd over shoreline publiic lands." Is this true? 22. Page 52• The statement is made at Ube top of the page: "There is also as direct link between public ownership of shorelines and bboating patterns. Where -large parcels are in public ownershipp, and where physical feeatsres are favorable rafting is an iampcetant activity." We (ldea't understand what this means; eouLld you please clarify? 23. "rage 52, item M. sub. b. Our undersatanding is that this statement allowas the LMCD to have authoority over land use control. We prrty iously stated iL ours Presentation at the June 6th publiac bearing, that we whrre against the LMCD having land use cratrol. 24. Page 55# under =ltea f8, it states: "Thee present LKCD poll is to encouragat development of addittlmal intermediate regional parks. ** YOU should be more sapecific, i.e. 0 Lake Minnetonka Regioor.al Park. 43? Mr. David J... Lrndorfer June 12, 19990 Page # The above quuefylons and comments were szpecific to the report. In relationshipp to the presentation made or June 6th, we wanted to re- emphasizee :'at the City of Mound is against programs to reduce and ul timaate:y eliminate grandfatt.nering at municipal and homeowner amss:ciation docks. It is the - tosition of the City that it has 4.5 mw:es of City owned lakeshocre which provides dockage for the bene:ef:t of all residents of the City. The City otf !_•ound is also concerned with the statement under shoreland pr.ro:- ection dealing with the thousand foot control of developmentt, redevelopment and land -.asts. This becomes a very serious re=tr ction, particularly as itt pertains to industrial use, i.e., tie former Tonka Toys bui- lfing, currently owned by Balboa of MVint+esota. I hope thee ; uestions above and ccaments are taken as constructivfre. We would appreciate a reel ;onse to those questions and any otheer comments that you might have. We look forward to hearing froom izu. Sincerely, i G \- -Edward J, C:�rut. e, Jr. City Managee~r cc: Gene Stitrmmen Tom Reeese ES:ls C CnTT OF MOUND PRESE27TATI1N FOR LMCD LAKE KANAGEME.£NT PLAN PUBLIC NEARING CITY OF MIHNNETONKA, MINNESOTA JUNE , 6, 1990 - 7 PM INTRODUCTION It is the position of the City of Mound that the LMCD must continue to be the agency fdDr the management of the surface use of Lake Minnetonka. The LLake Management Plan that has been developed by Arndorfer and:: Associates, in cooperation with the LMCD Board of Directors, vsarious committees, staff and other agencies demonstrates a 31nceere effort in analyzing the problems and issues facing the LMCD rind its 14 member cities. This plan is essential to managing tithe future of Lake Minnetonka and the surrounding communities. • Over the years, the LMCD Kass been effective within its limited authority. The long term pplan calls for some changes in its structure that includes giviang it the ability to be a stronger taxing authority. The Citty of Mound believes that if such authority is granted, oeoberrs should be elected by the people that they are taxing ratther than the current system of appointments. SPECIFIC ISSUES I. The City of Mound applauuds the LMCD for its efforts to fight the Eurasian Water Milfo Dil problem in Lake Minnetonka. This effort is an example of tte LMCD's interest in protecting the environment. The C City of Mound encourages the LMCD to continue to take a stronmg stance on the environment. 2. The City of Mound believves that land use regulations should remain under city contra Dl. 3. The City of Mound is against programs to reduce, and ultimately eliminate, grandfathering at municipal and homeowner association doocks. It is the position of the City that it has itself 400 + - Commons Docks which are maintained for the benefit of all rresidents of the City. • 6 3 t q. The City of Moc:ur,.. bel ieves that the City :. of !found should not increase acceQss to Lake Minnetonka f --or non - lam ashore residents at t :ne expense of lakeshore owneters. 5. The City of Mo.:�-d supports the LMCD in :.:obtaining authority to charge user f!es for the use of Lake Mi:in:etonka. COWCLUSION The City of Mound - .!cognizes that Lake Minnne.onka is both a regional asset ana_ :::e enjoyed by individual _ Lakeshore owners. The rights of one s::culd not and need not b= sacrificed to benefit the other. • 2 43 STATE OF [ aC�2UVQ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Metro Waters, 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MN 55106 PHONE NO. 77 2 - 79 10 FILE NO March 5, 1991 EC , hVI v � J J1 The Honorable Skip Johnson Mayor, City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 RE: DNR OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SHORELAND MANAGEMENT LAND USE CONTROLS FOR LAKE MINNETONKA COMMUNITIES Dear Mayor Johnson: A number of questions have been raised by several of the Lake Minnetonka communities concerning the above subject. We have reviewed our rules and operating guidelines. The following is a synopsis of some of the concerns we have heard and how we intend to address those concerns: I. Interpretation of Flexibility Rules and Neighboring ov ernm eRt9 Approval Author ties =_ Minnesota Rules, Part 6120.2800, Subpart 3 states that "Local governments may, under special circumstances and with the commissioner's approval, adopt shoreland management controls that are not in strict conformity with these minimum standards and criteria, ... ". Subpart 3A goes on to specify a number of special circumstances. Subpart 3B lists the possible types of alternative management standards that may be considered while subpart 3C explains the process by which a local government requests consideration of an alternative approach. Subpart 3D outlines how the commissioner of DNR and the local government requesting an alternative approach are to handle such a request. More specifically, subpart 3D (3) states that "The local governments proposing the alternative control and the commissioner shall solicit the input of the public and other governmental bodies that could be affected (our added emphasis) by the alternate control." and subpart 3D (4) states that "Alternate shoreland controls must be approve (our emphasis again) by other units of government having adjacent (again, our emphasis) land use authority impacted by the alternate controls." 439 0 • • AN F00AL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mayor Skip Johnson March 5, 1991 Page (2) Our interpretation of Subpart 3D (3) as applied to Lake Minnetonka communities is that any of those communities requesting any reduction or relief from strict conformity with the minimum statewide standards would be "affecting" the other 13 communities by using alternative controls. The commissioner and that local government then would have to "solicit the input of the public and the other governmental bodies ". We interpret subpart 3D (4) to mean that those communities that have "adjacent land use authority impacted ... ", that is share a common land boundary, would have approval authority over each adjacent community's land use controls if the adjacent community proposes to use an alternate shoreland control. Given the above explanation along with all of the other provisions contained in Minnesota Rules, Part 6120.2800, Subpart 3, DNR felt that an appropriate way to "solicit input" by "affected governmental bodies" was to use the LMCD technical review committee format spelled out in the shoreland grant agreement contained in our December 27, 1990 letter to each of you. Recall that there is no approval authority for local units of government or the LMCD mentioned in that agreement, only provisions for majority and, if necessary, minority positions. It was our intent to use LMCD as a facilitator or coordinator for each of the "affected" local government's review of any proposed alternative shoreland controls. We anticipated there would be no "voting ", merely a discussion of each proposal for alternative controls. The agreement goes on to indicate that the commissioner would make the decision to either approve or disapprove each individual communities proposal for alternative controls that do not strictly conform with minimum statewide standards. The grant agreement does not address "adjacent land use authorities approvals ". 11 Mayor Skip Johnson March 5, 1991 Page (3) II. Now does DNR intend to address the approval of alternate shoreland controls by " adiacent land use authorities? Since each LMCD community has at least two "adjacent land use authorities ", we expected that each of the 14 communities would be asked by at least one or possibly two or more of its neighbors to approve an alternate shoreland control. The procedure for this "approval" authority is up to each city. It is also the commissioner's prerogative to accept or reject any local community's proposed alternate controls. The technical review committee process would be used to facilitate each of the 14 communities review of its neighbors proposed controls.. Following completion of that process, DNR would then formally ask each of the adjacent land use authorities, to "approve" the proposed alternate shoreland controls. We intended to use the shoreland grant process to facilitate both the preparation of each LMCD communities land use controls and the review of each other communities controls. III. v s peg,ekbe 27 letter? Each community choosing not to participate in the grant process would then have to deal with DNR and its 13 neighboring communities individually. This means that if the community requested any type of less restrictive alternative control, that community and the commissioner would have to "solicit the input of other affected governmental bodies" and seek the "approval of adjacent land use authorities ". Because the LMCD technical review committee will provide for more uniform and consistent review of proposed land use controls, review of requests for alternative controls (aka: flexibility) could be more time - consuming and difficult to complete within the 2 -year time frame outside the technical review committee. As stated earlier, regardless of the process, each of the 14 communities will be asked for input or for their approval of a neighboring communities alternate shoreland controls. It was the DNR's intent to use LMCD to facilitate and coordinate this process, hopefully through economies of scale. However, a community may choose not to comment on any of its neighbors plans. DNR would interpret that silence as a form of approval. However, it is each individual community's choice as to how it chooses to comply with the DNR notice and participate in the process laid out in the shoreland Management Rule for enacting the shoreland management program. Mayor Skip Johnson March 5, 1991 Page (4) The grant process would also be handled individually; that is, each community would submit its application for a grant to DNR and not the LMCD. The budgeted amount for any individual community would remain the same. Any given community can choose to either participate with the Department and the LMCD in the technical review process or they can deal with the Department individually, but they still would be constrained by the "affected" and /or "adjacent" parts of the Shoreland Management Rule as discussed above. IV. What about a separate joint powers agreement? It is DNR's view that grant agreement contained in the December 27, 1990 letter is a joint powers agreement. This is based on the above interpretation of "affected" and "adjacent" alternative land use control authorities and the formation of a technical review process to solicit input without approval authority. We feel that this joint powers agreement does not compromise any "adjacent community's" right to address any alternate land use controls proposed by • its "adjacent neighbor ". This agreement does not give LMCD any authority other than a facilitating or coordinating role. There is no "veto" authority in the existing grant agreement. We trust the above information explains our position with regards to this matter. We are hopeful that your community will decide to work with both the LMCD and the DNR in implementing the shoreland management program. If you have further questions or desire more information, please contact Ed Fick or me. Sincerely, n Linc Stine gional Hydrologist, Region 6 cc: Gene Strommen, LMCD Kent Lokkesmoe, Acting Director, Division of Waters Paul Swenson, Acting Administrator, Permits & Land Use Section Ogbazghi Sium, Supervisor, Land Use Unit Peder Otterson, Shoreland Supervisor Ceil Strauss, Area Hydrologist • s v1 El ad A 0n -� I CITYof ORONO Post Office Box 660 Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323• Municipal Offices March 11, 1991 Mayor Skip Johnson City of Mound 3018 Island View Drive mound, MN 55364 Subject: LMCD Comprehensive Plan Dear Mayor Johnson, REC`C MAR 2 This letter is transmitting to you a letter we had sent to LMCD regarding our ongoing concerns with their Comprehensive Plan, in advance of a meeting of LMCD and a number of the cities on March 6, 1991. As you may be aware, four of the five issues wore addressed at that meeting and there seems to be an indication by LMCD of their willingness to amend the plan in a manner similar to that outlined in our letter. We would like you to be apprised of our position in these four matters together with our ongoing concern regarding the surface use portion. Should you have question please feel free to contact members of our Council or myself. Sincerely, Mark E. B hardson City Administrator Enclosure cc: Mayor and City Council Edward Shukle, City Manager NI11.1J1N4; & ZONING - 47.}.7357 is rRAr1ON & HNANCE- 47373S$ 0 5 ti�t;551 `G FAX - 473-0510 On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka PUBLIC RORKS - 473.7359 clTYof oRaNa Post Office Box 66 • Crystal Bay, :Minnesota -- >.A 3 • Municipal Offices On the _North Shore of Lake Minnetonka February 28, 1991 Mr. Eugene R. Strommen, Executive Director Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 East Lake Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Subject: LMCD's Comprehensive Plan Dear Gene, During the 90 day period that LMCD has requested the Metro Council place its plan in a hold status, the City of Orono would like to again reiterate its position related to the plan. This letter is in addition to and not preemptive of previous comments on the plan. It is the desire of the City of Orono that LMCD remain within its original charge and not transform the organization as envisioned in the plan to an organization that has agendas and constituencies that are no longer shared by at least the majority of the cities around the lake. Specific areas of comment on the plan include: Board Structure - Based not only on Orono's continued opposition to an alteration to the Board, but now to the apparent reluctance of Suburban Hennepin Parks and Metro Council to participate as Board members, Orono desires the plan be amended to retain the Boards original composition. (We suggest LMCD obtain letters from each of those agencies stating they do not feel such is appropriate.) As an alternate LMCD may desire to amend the composition of the Board to more accurately reflect the financial contribution and /or shoreline on the Board. Shoreland - It is Orono's position that any reference to LMCD being involved in the shoreland area be deleted particular ily Appendix C and allow either DNR or Metropolitan Council handle. At most the plan should only indicate the regulations and objectives set forth in the plan are a model that has DNR acceptance and that the cities then individually deal with DNR in further development of their own regulations. It is additionally requested that LMCD also support the cities BUILDING & ZONING - 473.7357 • ADMINISITtATION & HNASCE - 4T3 -T358 • PUBLIC WORKS - 473.7359 ASSESSING FAX - 473-0510 Mr. Eugene R. Strommen Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 28, 1991 page 2 of 3 individual grant requests to DNR for the monies that were originally earmarked for the cities through LMCD. Finally the LMCD should limit its role regarding additional parking spots for public accesses to that of determining any adverse impacts on the surface use. Surface Use Management - The City of Orono would again encourage change in the emphasis of the plan so that the first priority is the handling of the existing safety problems on the lake before allowing additional access growth on the lake. The City of Orono again encourages the establishment of a standard density for the lake beyond which no growth would be allowed. While it has been argued that the literature would not support establishment of any standard, it is no different than many of the standards set forth in DNR shoreland regulations. No specific literature supports the precise standards selected. This is also true for many of the city's land use standards. However, the policy decision has been made by the policy boards which have considered them to be reasonable in light of the various factors. The City also urges that LMCD further explore regulation by type of craft and inclusion of the ongoing survey methodology as an appendix. The City also feels that the plan should address that LMCD should have not only control of the surface but also below the surface, currently DNR "Jurisdiction ". Such a dichotomy is not rational. Funding Structure - The City of Orono encourages that LMCD not further pursue, and in fact delete from their plan, the broadening of taxing authority independent of the cities particularily in light of Metropolitan Council's concern in this regard. Orono would also like the budgeting process be clarified so that cities have a date by which they can express objections to proposed budgets before final adoption of that budget. Additionally, the City of Orono in line with its support of LMCD as it was originally conceived would continue to encourage minimal staff for the board to only conduct existing powers in an effective manner. R ole o f Plan - In light of Metropolitan Council assertion of authority as to LMCD's plan, Orono again requests that LMCD include in their plan the status that this plan has been given by not only LMCD, but Metro Council and other agencies and that their roles be specifically defined within the plan to include the following: A. Sections over which of the various agencies specifically have review and /or approval authority. Mr. Eugene R. STrommen Lake Minnetonka Conservation District February 28, 1991 page 3 of 3 B. The process for review and amendment by LIICD of future plan amendments and the extent of review required by other governmental bodies. C. Specifically address the relation of LMCD actions to the comprehensive plan and how preceived or actual inconsistencies between the plan and LMCD actions are determined together with how any such inconsistencies -Le to be resolved. To the extent that this plan is approved by Metropolitan Council, L.' ".CD's definirg the plan role would then have Metro Council's concurrence. We remain open for further discussion. We are encouraged by Mr. Cochran's statements of February 22, 1991 on deletion of shoreland regulations from the plan, retaining the current Board composi+-ion and deleting reference to gaining additional taxation authority. on behalf o� the Orono City Council. I ark E. Be ardson City Administrator cc: Mayor and City Council JoEllen Hurr, LIMCJ Representative r� � i { March 4, 1991 Dear Mayor: „I 1�1( I. ui ifit. G0%F.KNOR 1 '(1 S 1A I F c I �iti r P t 'l. 551" Two weeks ago we introduced our proposal for the 1992 -93 budget -- a plan which for the first time in two decades holds the growth in state spending below the rate of infla- tion. If this plan is adopted, state spending will not out- pace the growth in people's paychecks. We are riot so naive as to think that the realities of deal- ing with a $1.8 billion shortfall for the 1992 - 93 biennium will be either easy to accept or pleasant. As a c ity leader, you and your constituents are such c '- fected by our budget and by our reform policies. We trust that y,,u will take the time to understand fully the goals arnci inter- relatedness of the total package before coming to final conclusions about the wisdom of the policies. There is much inaccurate information floating around about the impacts of the parameters we have set for finalizing the 92 -93 budget and the property tax reform provisions. For that reason, it is important that you not automatically translate cuts in local government aids into property tax increases. We have indicated repeatedly that we are willing to listen to the taxpayers. We are equally willing to work with those of you in city government who will be affected by the reduc- tion:; in local government aids. We are open to thoughtful, good ideas which accomplish our mutual objective to put the lid on spending growth. In fact, we have s! ,ec i f ical ly set up the Dyrstad Commission on State and Local Government Relations to work with you. This group will identify ways that the state can work with local units of government to make necessary changes -- such as reducing the number of mandates and lifting levy limits -- so we all begin living within our means. 'a are not ask,ingth cities to do that which we in at Kovernm are unWil_ling to do ourselves. We have set up the CORE Commission (Committee on Reform and Efficiency) to identify ways that state government can downsize, can work smarter, can work more cooperatively on an inter - agency and inter -- governmental basis, Their initial goal is to identify at least $10 million in savings OVER AND ABOVE the $111 million in cuts already made by state agencies. We urge you to consider doing the same on a local basis. Set up a commission with local counties and townships and with other adjacent municipalities and explore opportunities to downsize, to con- solidate and to reduce costs. We have proposed reducing costs by asking state employees to temporarily pay for a larger share of their retirement con - tribut -ins. We think this approach is far more humane than the ki of massive across - the - board layoffs that are occur- ring in other states. Private sector employees are ex- periencing the consequences of recession; fairness suggests that government employees cannot be totally insulated from economic downturns. We urge you also to consider cost savings actions on a local basis. Given the current crisis, we don't think a "business as usual" approach to employee compensation is a realistic position for cities to take. We have worked hard on our proposal to reduce spending growth without major tax increases, to keep our reserve fund intact to protect the budget against further economic decline, and to redirect spending to those areas that make the most sense for our FUTURE -- K -12 education, programs that prevent expensive social problems before they begin by promoting child development and family stability and, perhaps most important, tax /spending policies that remove the barriers to job creation in Minnesota. We urge you to consider doing the same on a local basis. Proierty taxes d:, not have to rise in every city. 'There are legitimate cost savings to be achieved if all put their minds to it. You can work with local citizens groups to help identify those services that are essential and then direct spending to those areas. Finally, we urge you to work together with us on property tax reform. The reason we presented principles rather than a specific bill is to provide the opportunity for each of you to come to the table and participate in this much needed reform. It is very easy to criticize. It is much harder to be constructive, to be creative and to come up with alterna- tives that accomplish the same objectives. We only have two weeks to put together a bill that reflects your ideas ... although it certainly can be amended after it is introduced. Please get your suggestions to us quickly. After traveling around the state in the past two weeks, we are certain the public, is with us on the goal to hold the line on state spending. We've been encouraged by the will- ingness of people to listen even though they have been frightened by the rhetoric on property tax increases -- rhetoric which often has little or no basis in fact. 2 For those cities that do not have the resources to absorb the cuts, we have proposed that there be adjustments in the categorical aids to make sure they can continue to provide basic police, fire and public works services. As you are well aware, property taxes already are likely to increase again in 1992 because of increased spending programs and levy limits of as much as 13 percent authorized by the 1990 legislature. This likely will occur regardless of what we do with the current budget. It is this in- evitability that we must stop. An important piece of our property tax proposal is the in- come sensitive homestead credit which would directly help the low income families and seniors who truly cannot afford higher property taxes. Our plan ensures that no Minnesotan will pay an unreasonable portion of family income for property taxes. Our plan is by no means perfect. It is by no means the on,y way to balance the budget in the face of a $1.8 billion deficit. It is our best effort. Leadership requires that all of us have the individual and political courage to do what is right for the future of this state. We hope you will join us. We need your ideas. arm regards, AR H. CARLSON ?0AXELL M. DY AD Governor Lt. Governor 3 CITY Of ,� I( )( 'NI) March 12, 1991 ?'pis lEtt_F,r w,i al�,t> .ent try Senator Gen Olson ��I It ;�.;�tative `_�t:f_�ve n�t'tt 125 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Senator Olson: Cities are bearing the brunt of Governor Carl son Is budget cuts over the State's 1992 -93 biennium. Carlson proposes to cut $313 million from state aid to cities. Cuts of this magnitude are unfair; the Governor's proposal addresses the State's budget shortfall by using local property taxes to raise additional revenues. We realize that the State has budget problems and is going to have to make some changes. However, the sizes of these cuts are extreme. The City of Mound will lose approximately $40,000 out of its July Local Government Aid payment. It wi?l lose, based upon Carlson's proposal, an additional $40,000 in its Decemter 1991 payment. For 1992, for all intents and purposes, Local Government Aid will be "history ". The City of Mound receives approximately $360,000 annually in Local Government Aid. We will be forced, as other cities, to look at cuts in services and /or raising taxes. Not in their right mind is going to raise taxes 30 %, (what Carlson's proposing) to make up for the loss in Local Government Aid. However, taxes will have to be increased and services will have to be analyzed by city councils and citizens. Snould we have to cut services, we will have to look at laying off personnel in our city, since personnel represents the largest cost within our budget. Senator Gen 01 - March 12, 1991 You tijve an understanding based upon your local government ex- perience the impact that Carlson's proposal will have on the City of Mound. Cities continue to be the victims of state spending. I am enclosing information from the League of Minnesota Cities (-MC) and the A s;:;ciation of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) that illustrates my point. The AMM information points out the estim,iterd impact of Governor Carlson's proposal upon property tax burdf, n. "I'he picture is very frightening. As a farmer local government official, I think you can understand my ponition. Cities cannot afford to have more aid cut from their Ludgets. I urge you to oppose any further cuts in Local Go vi:cr:r.;ent Aid as propo: ed by Governor Carlson. If you have any rlue:;tions, please contact . e. Sincerely, Edward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager cc: John Norman, Finance Director Mryor and City Council Don Slater, Executive Director, LMC Vern Peteraon, Executive Director, AMM enc. E,.1�; PA 4 ES`; NA.�.. :- -A_' :Oc Rc:1i'S PPC.'' ^SAl• �;ZJN FR x'i. R'T :U( BJ R:�E N$ x-- e: - SX' - �i Me _K , an Jr, M IZ p8, e5 22/2!79• Page 1 axes U70n a 56_ hpele taxes tin an overage vsltri' home I Taxes upon a $100,000 C/i pro perty TaAei upon a S1,OGG,000 C/: p'0pe .....ar Percent Ave'ege Curr ent GOvtrr * ^'s Dol '.tr Percent Curren; Governor's Dollar Percent Curre ^'. Governor's 0o ar Pe'Cen a.c.zx.zzszsx..sze.a :a. a_ s.. xzaa ....zzaa.xsza.aac_:ass:z_.a_c.. P-onosa',c -ra "..`,e -hange i Ye'. J! Law Proms$ i Chs Change I Law ..................... Propose!- Change _............ Change La. •. Propose Change Change A4`[A S_" L .,3�.. 17'3 109 t •seas:: ...................................... S74,C ^.� S 1•.,4!5 .719 93. (3,233 13,024 (S ?09) .......................... -6.5% ';247,6:0 z19,3 (zL .7.55 x =�.; LA - -.:• t• a s' 'SS 1'16 .. ° -.85 - 5100,100 21,203 51,96+ 5'61 b3.3% I 53.153 %2,96 (5167) 5.3% i 546,645 SIl,815 ($7.! t.P� A• _.a - S' ".. ic'_ _.. S•.1C 630 S1, 92)9 S 2=65 2. i S3, 49 f3 O °.:'6 (S',.3) i4, -2 5:.9 565 539 052 (S--! ., 2' 1 .'2... S BJ, L8C7 $1,645 i' - , 63.37. S ,! S h S,i 0 (3 ) -5 .9X &.:!, S`, 0 '! i ° '. .. L' . ,;. 5755 �., S71,000 1751 1',460 S709 53, 266 S3,0 - _2 (12,5) 1 -55 it - . S'.: S`t3 '3.5. f9! 0'0 51.224, S'. 996 s'... 63.0`, i S3 .... .... .................... 1 (5157) .1 -.... . 5.6% S -? E'. i3+ _ .... (S' -_ . +':a., '. -cw *- t•._ a -.- L'�k6 ,4`. 1.7' v ". ,, S7:r1 $ S' 1. ",2. I3, 191 SS. ;S1E' - -) 5 S'i_ _ i":' _ ;s° ;t 5: • .•. S' S' I4. ...P.S 1' _.. S' .. t1 ,. S6 , 8'... S3 s? S3 .s (i ?'.3t 7.3X S _ S.3 ,! . t7.- 6!:. S3 76 1.',2/90 (S 1!20? v% i.7 _. 13...57> .... S94c t', S_x,, 4.11 &3,161 (12 1) 7 -3% 10,!.' S: t, 554 fiC, 3W ) 1e 6% -- .. . -.. ................ S' - •6 ._ Si TOci .. ,........ S; :<' ... L'. - ...... L:.. .... -. 3; 6:. .....-- ..--- S3,L36 -----.....- (S.1 .......�.. -.. .... 7 .....- . ...... .............. `:7 S; 954 (13 1 k. 75 (622 ":) 7.0% s'a,t`. _�- ny e.A _.0w L�:" S' i'.. - .)% S4 t' �5' s7.. n $7 '.34 S3. C ;0 (t 7.) -2.4% i &Lb, 376 1 {St 62; 14 .2: . u:M - -... -. - -. L.." -. s• ''? s',:' ,.,... t ^,5 1859 1.,564 S. 62.2% ! S3,318 ...... -......... S3,0L0 ......... (2278) -8.L% 1 S49,109 ;..................... $39,525 (19,553) .tv.55 �.;*4GQ GAD♦•E 270 .. ...... s' ... _�. . ... .. s "b ........ ...... _..,. :. . ......... s.P'.c�: ............. 191 t' 'b ...............- s' "> ?1.C% 13,429 53,217 .............. (&212) -6.2% i S50.7 t4, ?,826 ............ ...... :RTS: AL S ". S' -„ &., ? ,,,,. :. s' i' -168 1!13 90.0'% 53,559 53,363 (1196) -5.5% ( 152,(' 54.3,717 cs8,o; ,. DAYTON s',. t s' sP: s; 14 &I P55 &'It 62.7% 13,424 &3,109 (1315) -9.2% t (50,670 1-;.C, 4. a (5&0,2;6) 20. DEE�NA VEN to?- I' _. s'�5 'C?c.5 $3,652 S3,'L0 S.`8 2.4% j $3,376 $3,151 (5226) -6.72 $49,971 $40,962 ($9,010) EA ;,AN S1 r &1,'15 se�0 61.12 i 13,052 $2,816 (1235) •7.7% j St5,164. $36,614 ($8,550) -18.9: ...;. EDEN PRAIRIE -.. _ ..... S1'. C, 630 51,929 z2,` S644 .... . .- I . 33.4% j .................... 53,376 ..... 53,172 .. ...........I...- (5204) .- ..--- -6.0% j $49,950 ------ - ---- W,236 ......- .- (&8,. ; -.._ -. -17.5% ED)NA S{•9 i 2�0 i ^'. t,S. . S'.4 :�? &2,411 6;,'40 5329 13 -6% 53,122 12,946 (S216) •6.9% j 54,6,207 &31,180 ($8,428) - 16.2% FALCON NEIGNT$ 6'13 S 5, t >.3 108.'5 5 s1,<o4 i2,2J3 1 53.5% i S3,528 53,282 (1246) •7.0% I 552,211 542,667 (So, 545) tR1DLEr 5021 S1,2s6 S56a 0'. sP. ",1J^ $tS2 s ^,526 56 79.1% j 13,127 &2,898 (5229) -7.3% I &46,279 (37,669 (58,611 GOLDEN VALLEY j &7C2 Z',cJ4 57 92 112.95 ! %&04,700 $1,50. S2,3D0 1792 52.6% j 13,:15 53,244 (1171) .............. -5.0% 1 550,54.2 -..... &42,166 (&8,377) -16.65 NAST:rG1 2593 S1,13., 17911 133.52 ....................... 574,600 $708 ................... $1,518 5811 ......(............. 114.52 .2,991 ............. 53,016 $65 2.2% 544,267 $39,730 (U. 537) -10.2% NOPLINS $652 f1,'12 1!I0 12'.2% &87,000 11,017 11,897 $880 86.5% ' 13,233 $3,223 (SIG) -0.3% 547,8;5 &41,897 ($5,949) -12.4% INVER GROVE NEIGNTS i 5659 %I.3 -4 S n C.C% .87,200 &1,031 51,775 $74.3 72.1% ( .3,277 $5,058 (&219) •6.7% S48,49S 539,749 (58,749) •18.0% nANTOMEO! fool .1,41+ 5719 103.1% .100,000 11,344 .2,076 1731 $4.4% $3,385 f3, 101 (6283) •8.4% I &50, 095 540,316 (%9,777) •19.5% MAPLE GROVE j :... $760 11,542 S7S2 102.92 1 589,600 &1,243 %2,032 5789 63.5% f $3,625 13,311 (&313) -8.6% j $53,644 S41,048 (S1D,597) -19.8+ - ............ MAPLEdJ00 .......... 1'10 _ ............... S`,4.. S'6,!7 101 "1% ............................ S!3,300 $1,030 -.... $1,811 ................. $781 ....... 75.8% j ..,- $3,449 ---- .----._........- &3,209 (%239) -6.9% j 651,039 Ki,720 ($9,318) -18.32 MENDOTA NET - GNTS j 1594 $1,235 &641 107.95 1139,700 52,195 %2,538 $343 15.6% j 53,065 (2,834 (1231) •7.5% ( 445,366 536,846 (58,520) -15. S N)NNEA -0L TS 1.591 51,678 scgl 1<Z. X I 574,400 5821 $1,836 61,015 123.5% $3,377 $3,555 %179 5.3% 549,976 K6,220 (%3,756) -7.5% M:Nw -1ONC4 J 5653 51,360 1727 111.3% j $117,600 $1,775 S2,I56 &621 34.4% 53,260 13,C52 ($208) •6.4% ( 548,245 539,671 (58,574) •17.8% MCARID I $646 11,396 $750 116.0% j 587,800 51,022 $1,802 1780 76.3% + $3,215 $3,076 (5139) -4.3% ( 547,588 539,988 ($7,600) -16.05 • in x,r de- to eatfnete the lerptct of the :. -,or•s pr000ssL upon property tax burdens, It is necessary to make several assumptions, especially in regard to the distribution of state aid. these est+AUtet may be revised as pore detsitS of tnt Governor's p-000sak becose availaola, CITY LGA IS NOT A CAUSE OF STATE BUDGET PROBLEMS CALENDAR STATE S MILLION % CHANGE % CITY LGA YEAR FISCAL CITY LGA LGA STATE G.F. EXP. YEAR 1989 1990 376 5.6% 1990 1991 337 -10% 4.6% 1991 1992 318 . 6% 4.1% 1992 1993 292 - 8% 3.7% PER CAPITA CITY SPENDING (,n constant 1980 dollars) $500 - - - Source: State Auditor's Office LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITtLiS 11112190 REVENUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Per Capita Comparison Minnesota vs U.S. Average Report by the Legislative Auditor, State of Minnesota "LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING" March 1990 Per Capita 1986 Revenue of U.S. and Minneso ities U.S. Minnesota MN as % of U.S. $604.51 $523.93 88% STATEWIDE PROPE TAX ESTIMATES Taxes Payable 1991 1992 Percent Increase + 11% +13% The elimination of LGA would increase property taxes by an ADDITIONAL 15 %. STATE TAX GROWTH ESTIMATES Fiscal Year Percent Increase 1992 + 2.9% 1993 +4.8% ource: U.S. Census Bureau Aft League of Minnesota Cities LGA CRITICAL TO LOW WEALTH CITIES Components of Cities' Revenue Bases = LGA/EQ DRA/Taconite H AGA M Net Levy 1, e r c e n t 0 f R e V e n U e l•rt 8 0 60 40 20 0 All 'Al 1 ' � ' ii II! f A 7150- $1.000- S1,250- 41.500- S1.750- $2.000. 1.000 1,260 1.800 1,760 2,000 T C nei 1 + 0 r n itn CA o League of Minnesota Cities so- $260- $600 - 260 60c 750 Local Govet Eitti Aids- F` itidarnental Principles .Property tax relief should be primarily provided to individuals through a property tax relief system. - rhe state should provide its economic resources to services that clearly fulfill state priorities. Aid should be based on the need for primary ser- vices and where the capacity is inadequate to meet the need. it Aid programs must be policy- based,not driven by expenditure -based formulas. Service level and cost must be linked to the decision - making process at the local level. SOURCE: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL 5��rrir2lary of 1992 -93 Budget Recommendati Budget Recomm F.Y. 1992 F.Y. 1993 1992 -93 `curt mary of Fiscal impact Local Aids $ 0 00)= $ (539) $ (639) Property Tax Refunds 0 1 89 189 Total $000) $ (3S0) $(450) The $SOm Chapter 2 cut is carried forward as a reserve restoration. SOURCE: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL FY 92 -93 Ai t Local g ove r nments ■ Summary Recommendations Tax Aids and Credits Current Law Protected Aid School Aid County Aid Total Protected Aid Non - school Aid subject to Reduction LGA Disparity Reduction Aid Bord , �r City DRA Attach. Mach. _ -HACA Suppi Hmstd Relief Enterprise Zone RTB Levy Reduction Total Aid Subject to Reduction Proposed /flit RestnrRuring CY 1991 Base Cut FY 92 -93 Cut Total Aid Restructuring Recommended Nonschool Aid Appropriation Recommended Total Tax Aids and Credits FY 1992 FY 1993 FY 1992 -93 1,134.8 1,079.1 2,213.9 168.8 171.4 340.2 192. 19 2.4 384 361.2 363.8 725.0 346.3 314.2 660.5 30.2 28.8 59.0 1.5 1.5 3.0 2.4 2.4 4.8 390.2 365.2 755.4 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.1 min 2.6 2.7 5.3 773.6 715.0 1,488.6 (50.0) (50.0) (100.0) (50.0) (489.0) (539.0) (1 00.0) (539.0) (639.0) 673.6 1 849.6 1,034.8 539.8 1.574.6