The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-03-26 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - 3-26 -91 #1 VARIANCE OF 18.5' TO THE REQUIRED 30* FRONT YARD A_S_E_1LD-A Pg. 683 -699 CITY OF MOUND 6. 1990 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPORTS MOUND, MINNESOTA MOUND CITY COUNCIL Pg. 700 -738 REGULAR MEETING - JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER ,IMM -2 -6,__19.4.1 739 - 741 CITY 'COUNCIL CHAMBERS - JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR Pg. 1. PLEDGE: OP ALLEGIANCE. 7. 2. APPROVE MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 1991, REGULAR MEETING AND THE MARCH 19, 1991 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. QUARANTINING OF ANIMALS Pg. 758 -762 MEETING. Pg. 644 -652 8. 3 • US TOM EFFERTZ, 4757 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOT 11, BLOCK 7, DEVON, PID #30- 117 -23 22 GOVERNMENT AID (LGA) CUT Pg. 763 -766 0059. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR A 9. APPROVAL OF LABOR CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) AS PREPARED BY CITY ATTO"NEY. Pg. 653 -669 u 4 • IvASE_f91=QD_41_._BRENT & GAYLE THOMTON, 6343 BAYRIDGE 10. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT ROAD, W. 45' OF` THAT PART OF LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 2, BAYRIDGE, PID U23- 117 -24 33 0009. OF SUPPORT FOR SUBURBAN HENNEPIN PARKS VARIANCE: INADEQUATE STREET FRONTAGE Pg. 670 -682 5. Ua"91-095: —JEFF & ROXANNE RITENOUR, 5656 771 -786 BARTLETT BLVD., BLOCK 9, LOT 11 TO 16, MOUND BAY TO THE MOUND HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT PARK, PID #23 117 -24 14 0027 A` TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM VARIANCE: TO A NON CONFORMING PROPERTY, AND A 787 VARIANCE OF 18.5' TO THE REQUIRED 30* FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR THE ADDITION OF AN ATTACHED GARAGE. Pg. 683 -699 6. 1990 DEPARTMENT HEAD ANNUAL REPORTS - LEN HARRELL, POLICE CHIEF Pg. 700 -738 - JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER Pg 739 - 741 - JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR Pg. 742 -757 7. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 546.50 - QUARANTINING OF ANIMALS Pg. 758 -762 8. RECOMMENDED BUDGET CUTS TO MEET JULY LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID (LGA) CUT Pg. 763 -766 9. APPROVAL OF LABOR CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1320, PUBLIC WORKS Pg. 767 -770 10. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT OF SUPPORT FOR SUBURBAN HENNEPIN PARKS . -AT !ON Pg 771 -786 TO THE MOUND HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT A` TO FILL AN UNEXPIRED TERM Pg. 787 ",'ATUS OF DAKOTA RAIL NEGOTIATIONS Page 642 E; k �y a ?age 643 1 4 L - 1 C F N : , h , " R E N E W A L S Pg. 788 1 PA Y; EINT CF I 1, L S Pg. 789-802 AFQ RMATI QN1 MIUELUNEQU-5 Pg. 803 14911 F1 NANC. -HFFORT AS PREPARED "u"'A", FINAN.'E 1"IfiECTOR Pg. 804-80 ON Y' UTE S OF "".A Pg. 806-81C p X 1 OF q c, Pg. 811-812 ti ]L'N -0- J TT v XARY FACHOLKE, E i'LV D. -, 7 � I—)CONTINUING ai T!" S r R I y IN LAKE LANGDON A R j UA 1 E A L M D Pg. 813-817 1 ATE D l"ARCE 1: 1 9 91, FROM JANET ` X A "N , 15 7 E L U. Eli; - in I ANE, RE: ARTICLE N i. T I_Q_E ON f*O:;:, IMPROVEMENTS. Pg. 818 G. N Fu P M A ON F f C M, t f! RECENT RATE ' I ON Pg. 81 9-828 1 F i A I ! E K G R 0 U N L F . � 'ALS FOR GOAL SETTING/ TEAM; Fi'-TLL:NG SEssio'N OMITTED WHEN I DISTRIBUTED ,-,,A-r A' COW - �-19 - Y T F'� : - 1 91 . HAND OUT I• REMjNj)f3,j-PL EASE LET FRAN KNOW ASAP RE: ATTENDANCE AT LEAGUE CF MINNESOTA CIT -LES LMC ) LEG ISLATIV E CON 4 - 10 -91, ST PAUL J. GOAL SETTING/TEAM BUILDING SESSION SATURDAY, A PR I L 6, 1991, 8 AM TO 4 PM, CITY HALL V, • CITY HALL OPEN HOUSF, SUNDAY, APRIL -EEMLN1)!B! a ?age 643 MINUTES - HOUND CITY COUNCIL - MARCH 12, 1991 The City Couricil of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, March 12, 1991, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Acting Mayor Phyllis Jessen, Cournciimembers Andrea Ahrens and Ken Smith. Mayor Skip Johnson and Councilmembe- Liz Jensen were absent and excused. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Attorney Curt Pearson, Building Official Jon Sutherland, City Engineer John Cameron, Linda Strong Acting City Clerk, and the following interested citizens: Parker Hodges of the Sailor News, Judy Soukup of the Laker, Belinda Ostrowski of the Weekly News and Arlan Stoltenow. The Acting Mayor opened the meeting and welcor;ed the persons in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 1 - O HI U.TE S MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Jessen and car :•ied unanimously to approve the minutes of the February 26, 1991 meeting. 1.1 gE,` ?QLl !_Ti411__P,�4�LB11��IS_�a.T. BLS__ ��. T_ 4iE. EK_II�_T:HE__E.TTY_S�E_H93l�Ip, The Acting Mayor read the proclamation declaring Girl Scout week. Smith moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #91 - RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING GIRL SCOUT WEEK IN THE CITY OF MOUND The vote was unanimously in favor. 1 .2 HBLI -C— BEARIK._L9-31 --- t41-002;—. TS?�f_EEFEBT , __ ?5 ?_I LANp__YIE]d DINE, __101_._1-1.,__ELOGK_ 7, _ DEYOL ---- Pii?t3. -11 - 2�22_40�T. The Acting May : opened the pub- 1 hearing. Building Official Jon Suthe.r? :nd stated that the applicant was seeking a Conditior_i Uses Permit (CUP) to alicw the constructicn of an oversi:-.,: garage. The proposa is in excess of that allowed by the zoning code in area and lot coverage. Both applicable sections of the Code are under Font deration for amendment to allow for greater garage sizE. The apciicant did revise his request to t_:e more c ,mpatible. The Plrriring Cc;:::ri ;;:.ion did vote unarimou:v to ai.pr<.ve tr « CUP. r.rlrn : >tc_t. «_rr; ap t plican's .. +.. I� <�c t �) a i .. u,.. .:`ed til s w1 `` •w:! trl t h -.. Cou 1 1 . 1h.e Ac ti ng Mayor the existing r;(�:... or,ly b e '( u7 glare feet of U I NOTION by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to deny the CUP for the construction of an oversized accessory building at 4757 Island View Drive The motion was amended by Smith and seconded by Jessen as follows: NOTION to deny the CUP for the construction of an oversized accessory building and to refer this to the City Attorney to prepare a resolution to deny the CUP at 4757 Island View Drive, set forth conditions and return it to Council at the March 26, 1991 regular meeting. The vote was unanimously in favor. The amended motion carried. 1.3 REOUELT�l��E.__MQS�dp DAY__ PARK__ A�_ _�lElb�I1��ITE_FS?B__Alll�l!!tlL BASS- E15HINGQONTEET,_ AHEEID AN- 5CHOLA.RZHIP_EVUNDATION_- �1lNi2A.Y �__ �1lNE__1��_1491 NOTION by Smith, seconded by Ahrens to approve the request by the American Scholarship Foundation to use Hound Bay Park as weigh -in site for annual bass fishing contest on Sunday, June 16, 1991. COdHENTS AND �UGGES TIQH� �Q GI TjKEN�_P$EE�IT There were none. 1. COMMENTS _41�LT�Q�LI�F.N� _AP�LI�ATIS�FBQM_AL_A_6LbA E4B C H ARTER BO _ _F_Q1L_T1UTQ_ Eh5_QF_HEETIhO_ ZOINO_ORDINANU BE"IREMENT� City Manager Ed Shukle stated the LMCD asks the City for comments regarding the re- issuing of this license. The Council had no comments. 1.5 All DN _F OR- A_HllLTTPLE_PQ-CK_A -.H4 MB G ARF _ LIMU __ FRO ti__ HIANETQNKA_ ,QOAT__ HER 1AL .3_EQB_FURPOZE,D_DE M EETSNS�ZONINS _9BplNAN�E_BEQDIBEMENT� The LMCD requests comments from the Council on this if there are any. There were none. t . 6 T_ DID__DPENIND__ RATE_FD_B__ A N.N.UAL_ _*EAIr_�QAS__ DATE_ _- _.APBIL__5,.__199.11 MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Smith and carried unanimously to set April 5, 1991 as the bid opening date for the annual sealcoat project. aET _DID- 0- PEN1,NG_ DATE_F4.R.___ LIE 1__51AT1.4N__I BOYEMEhT_D it ;(;1:;STRD_DA1'E: _ -_APUL 5, 1951). r , seconded 1991 as -)t::,. by Ahrens and carried unanimously the bid opening date for the lift U • U APP84YdL_ 4F__L UENE�..ANi1. PERMITS Our Lady of the Lake School requests a permit for Monte Carlo Nite on April 13, 1991. City of Mound Police Reserves requests Temporary On -Sale Non - Int.oxicating Malt Liquor Permit, Public Dance Permit and Se'. Up Permit for April 27, 1991 for the Pond Arena. MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Smith and carried unanimously to approve the above requested permits. 1.9 APP B.4YAL__4F_.CHANGE-_MFR, - L —._S -X- HALLA p=_QN_A_REM0 ELI; City Engineer John Cameron discussed with Council change orders 64 and 66 from Shingobee Builders, Inc. Change Order #59 - Item 1 - City deleted wood trim around the lights on level 4. Item & 3 - Folding door deleted (307A) TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER #59 ($915.00; Charge Order 164 - Item 1 - Change carpet in west hall from blue co green item 2 - Re- stocking and freight for special order # 708 vinyl base Item 3 - Labor to instal! and tear off vinyl base in lower police area TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER #6 ADD $1C41.00 Change Order 166 - Item A - Lighted key switch in room 106 Item B - Brighter lighting in room 105 Item C - Carpet base on ali HVA.0 air diffuser cabinets Item D - Carpet base for reception counter Item E - Additional reinforcement for enlarged footings due to poor soils Item F - Additional mini blinds item G - Modify downspout to accommodate added underground spr: r.k! e E stem. Item H - Th�;mt; turns on doors 104A & 106A (, Item I - Door 'loser required on door 1C7A Item J - B -uE carpet added to stairs TOTAL FGP Cii ;A1'GE ORDER V66 ADD $1,923.00 r E..;r'_r, sc�cc:;dd the f ow :nE resolution: ;,1 HTIf 091 -39 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDERS NUMBER 59 , 611 AND 66 - CITY HALT ADDITION AND REMODELING PROJECT. fuV t;ciri cr+rr.ed. a tR. (P y0 oil a 1 . 1 0 PAIMUT_QF_. BILLS MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Smith to authorize the payment of bills as presented on the pre -Iist in the amount of • $223,204.18, when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. F-10 F—IT194 1 . 1 t 1941__LIFT_. �TAT14K. IHPBQYEriEI IT�.,_S�i91��_�F.B_1�14�__1�.. �2$5�44 Smith moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #91 -40 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDER 01, IN THE AMOUNT OF $2.85, FOR THE 1991 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS, P -1. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.12 FAXMUT_._ fIF�4 f ..ST__13,- 1g44_LIFT_�TATIQ�!_ iMPB4YEHENT� City Engineer John Cameron explained this payment request is for work completed through, February 28, 1991 on the subject project. The amount of this request is $34,631.70. MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Smith and carried unanimously to approve Payment Request 03 on the 1990 Lift Station Improvement Project MFRA #8635 in the amount of $34,631.70. 1-13 DANIA__ RAIL City Attorney Curt Pearson said he had received a letter from Elli Mills informing the City that he cannot provide title to the land and was cancelling the (- ontrac. to purchase the land. He would like to renegotiate. MOTION by Smith and seconded by Jessen directing City Manager and City Attorney to contact Mr. Mills communicating the City's concerns and returning to the March 26, 1991 regular Council meeting with the update and to continue further discussion at that tim . The vote w�3:; unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1 .14 INF9.$HA T I9 dL H.I SEL LAbE9�� A. Department Head M;,;nth y Feport , for F'et�ruary 1 for" Fe)riiar;y' 19 C.. i.MCD i P1 nnir;g C,;r:mi .ior. Mir: ruary 1 991 . 4 �0 E. Article entitled, "Cable Reform Achievable: Mayor Finds It Needs Your Support ", written by Dave Karp in the VaLi4tl - Litit._1t - dated February 25, 1991, on cable television. F. League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Annual Legislative Conference is scheduled for April 10, 1991, St. Paul Radisson. If you are interested in attending, let Fran know ASAP, on and Anal ;i U, Census data as prepared by ts,e Wert i1enr; >j n Eiumat) Service - P1arin: -ng Bcard. REMINDER.. C.O.W. Meetir; i , Tuesday, March 1 9, 1991, 7 FM, City Hail. - . BEMINDER_. Goal Setting/Team Building Session with Barbara Arney, april 6, 1991, F AM - 4 PM, City Hall. Material will be sent out ahead of meeting. �. IiEM1ADER.: Invitation to attend Downtown Economic DeveIapmert Project KicK c0ff Reception, Wednesday, March 13, 1991 , 5 PM to 7 PM, City : ;all . K. Attached is a draft of a letter that could be sent to the 14 Lake cities from Mayor Jc,isnson. Skip asked me to have the Council review this on Tuesday evering so that it could be sent out by March 13. ±f you have any changes, please bring them to the meeting TL:esday evening L. Letter dated March 5, 1991 , from D,NR re: Operating Procedures for Impler::ent:ition of Shoreland ManiFerr.ent Lard Use Controls. Mention was made of the Earth Day Fair at Mound Bay Park on Satu, day, April 20, 1991 :'rare would be several earth aware booths and information. MOTION by Ahrens, seconded by Smith and carried unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 8 :35. r: r ; C rrrr. I ( VS' • MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - MARCH 19, 1991 Thr weri i Lg was called to order at 7 f'M. Momtern present: .er;t . Johnson, Smith, Ahrens, Jensen and J•'SSeri. Absent: none. Alsc present: City Manager Ed Shukle, City Engineer John Cameron, Parker h dE,es ef the allgl and Tom Eeese, LMCD Repre entative. A brier review of the January 15, 1991 Committee of the Whole minute " W, -Is The Public Works material storage issue was discussed. The city manager presented the appraisal as prepared by BCL Appraisals of Minneapolis on the Anthony's Floral site. The appraisal, not including sail corrections, was $70,000. Discussion was held. John Cameron, City Engineer, reviewed a cost estimate on preparation of the site should the City acquire it for public works storage. Cameron presented three alternates under phase one with Alternate "A" estimated tc= be $163,000, Alternate "B" $142,400 and Alternate "C" $131 ACC. Fhase one represented improving the area from Commerce Boulevard west back to the site, with the marshy area being included ander phase twn The phase two under A ternate "Y" for $97 , 300, Al ternate ". $80,600. After some discussion, Council directed staff to f -rward the appraisal on to Tony UanDerSteeg and to indicate to him that the City was interested in pursuing negotiations on the property. The factors that will have to be considered in negotiations are soil borings, the driveway easement Gnd dredging spoils that are currently being dumped there by Minnetonka Portable Dredging. Mayor Johnson agreed to assist the City Manager in negotiating with Tony and trying to do that within the next week. City Manager Ed Shukle and City Engineer John Cameron updated the Council on the city hall project. They indicated that the original estimate of $974,864 has teen slightly exceeded. The actual cost as of February 28, 1991 is $976 ,603.35 (please note the revised contract amount includes change order 944 in the amount. of $6,610 for rerroval of contar,inated soil which should be 901 reirr ;uursaLle from the b.PCA). ShuVie and Cameron expressed to the Council the concern that they had with the construction observation portion of the cost. The esti - r.at.e there was $28,941 an('. ti actual cost incurred had teer $48,690.55 as of 2- 28 -91. They said that this is likely to increase if Shingobee continues to delay the completion of the project. They advised the Council that a letter had been sent to the vice president of Shingobee dated Marf'h 19th, which they were zho6n a copy of, indicates that the City of Mou a + Co b;. :'rank RGUS Associates is unhappy with ..':t:• amount of t i me it is taking to get x. 'rtiain item:; of the Punch l ist cOmplPted satisf T hey told th(. Council tha' they had .. meeting c n Fetruary 28, 1991. They indicated that O h i r g L e ! F = h a s a ssured t h e C i ty th all items, with a few 410 exceptions on the punch list, would to! completed eted by March 15, lv �ci MINUTES — COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE — MARCH 19, 1991 1991. It being, past that. date, they felt that a letter ought to be sent: which would serve tree purpose of A.I.A. General , !j itic>r,s, ArticIe 2.4.1, in which the Contractor has $even days Tom Reese, t.MCD Representative, was present to review the recent information on the Long Term Management Plan and Shoreland Management Plan. Reese presented a letter dated March 18, 1991 which was written; by Mr. Charles LeFevere of Homes and Graven, emphasizing that the Long Term M,n.agement Plan was a plan. This letter was sent to Gene Strummer:, Executive Director of the LMCD with the idea of transmitting this letter to all of the cities in the LMCD. In addition, Mayor Skip Johnson's draft of a letter to be sent t.o all mayors of the 14 communities was briefly discussed. It was agreed to send this letter. The purpose of the letter was to try to encourage cooperation amongst all the cities by suggesting a meeting to be held at Mound City Hall or, April 17, 1991. Also discussed w.:s the need to make an appeal tc the Department of Natural Re.our- „ �--. [ "1R` to consider the City of Mourd's interior la kes of Largdun a d .;etch in calculating the grant co so that Mound can gc% credit for those lakes as part of the joint venture of c:it.ier and the DNR in preparing the shureland management ccordinate . The city manager will follow up on this. Tom Reese also talk: l agout the Milfoii program for 1991 and the legislative p, opuEa_ of charging $2 per boat Eurchar ,e for assisting n the f � t` .r; fight against r'. ilfo_l . Also discus ed won existing fund;:, and r :r..ate donation::. City Manager Ed Shu o .:tl ined the Wal Government Ai;; clut:, as of the letter to satisfactorily complete all t ur:ch list. The 'letter f Urt!_ r stated that pe ti7e f,. ' . A. General Conditic 2.4.1 and Article ._ .2.1 e that MFFA and the Q ty of Mound were deducting the cost of MFRA's d..' 0 n 0 _ serv ices since December 15, 1991 , which was the date of substantial completion from the final contract amount. The eltimat.ed costs since that date for HFRA services is $10.000. They were !.old that the cost would continue to increase until the project is completed. This letter had been reviewed with Curt Pearson, city attorney, and upzn his approval it was sent to : hing: bee Builders. Cameron, and Shukle• oath stated that they were concerned by the lack of attendc:. to Q9 punch list by Shiigubee and were hoping that the letter of March 19, 1991 would serve the purpose in convincing Shingobee that they better act on getting the project completed. Tom Reese, t.MCD Representative, was present to review the recent information on the Long Term Management Plan and Shoreland Management Plan. Reese presented a letter dated March 18, 1991 which was written; by Mr. Charles LeFevere of Homes and Graven, emphasizing that the Long Term M,n.agement Plan was a plan. This letter was sent to Gene Strummer:, Executive Director of the LMCD with the idea of transmitting this letter to all of the cities in the LMCD. In addition, Mayor Skip Johnson's draft of a letter to be sent t.o all mayors of the 14 communities was briefly discussed. It was agreed to send this letter. The purpose of the letter was to try to encourage cooperation amongst all the cities by suggesting a meeting to be held at Mound City Hall or, April 17, 1991. Also discussed w.:s the need to make an appeal tc the Department of Natural Re.our- „ �--. [ "1R` to consider the City of Mourd's interior la kes of Largdun a d .;etch in calculating the grant co so that Mound can gc% credit for those lakes as part of the joint venture of c:it.ier and the DNR in preparing the shureland management ccordinate . The city manager will follow up on this. Tom Reese also talk: l agout the Milfoii program for 1991 and the legislative p, opuEa_ of charging $2 per boat Eurchar ,e for assisting n the f � t` .r; fight against r'. ilfo_l . Also discus ed won existing fund;:, and r :r..ate donation::. City Manager Ed Shu o .:tl ined the Wal Government Ai;; clut:, as 50 ro F- o,ed b p Y Governor Arne Carl o wn. ri:.... .� it :�.ica< tee trot $40,000 <r.._. proposed by € arl .on and apyrovw” t I Ine jrgislaturt wall b ` cut of ,.hn j,, y 19ji VGA p. yN ..,... he stated that Car, aran has proposed ,;c; cut. $40,C00 oat cf t,. . ycemt c :r 1991 LGA. p.iyment, but the l tag. . .turn that he Wrt icilateL has not a ed n that Lr,l' w i l; proposal. . is _ to severely Q indicates r A, 1 f not elimina in the 199S budget yr_ r•. in order Wo react wi these 50 MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - MARCH 19, 1991 0 cuts, john Norwan F! nuance Director and Ed Shukle examined the 1991 budget U see if line items could be reduced in order to make up for the loss coming out of the July payment. Shukle explainea they went through the line items in the General Fund and wale up with $9,353 in reductions. They also stated that they could transfer $6,000 out of the Recycling Fund to cover a portion of the Recycling Coordinator's salary and $21,000 cut of Liquor, Water and Sewer to reflect salaries of the Finance Dep:irtment which spend time working in those areas. The balance of $3355 could be taken out of contingency to come up with the $0,70 cut. They suggested that instead of absorbing $40,000 out of QP (lantral Fund reserve for anticipation of a cut in the Decemter 1991 payment, that services be looked at and this translates into staffing changes. Shukle indicated that there is adequate ti.rr to really analy.— service levels and staffing so that within the 1992 budget process, recommendations and ultimately decisions could be made on cutting some services and or staffing. Shukle emphasized it is important that tine reserve fund not be relied upon to absorb further cuts from the State of Minnesota through its Local Government Aid Program. A possible service organization sign was discussed. Ed Shukle presented a concept which had been developed by Ted Ganzel following the January COW meeting. Council directed the city 419 manager send a letter to service organizations regarding their participation. A possible city flag was discussed. Consensus was to order an outdoor flag which could be carried and hung on a pole at a size smaller than the US flag. It would be a royal blue with white background, incorporating the Mound City Days emblem. City Manager Ed Shukle updated the Council on the open house for city hall which in scheduled for Sunday, April 21, 1991 between the hours of 1 - 4 PM. He indicated that speakers would be designated and plaques would be presented. He also indicated thZjtr the Fublic Facilities Task Fcrce would be askf�-d to host the tours of the building. Coffee, cookies, etc. will tie provided. n v i t a t i c n , - , w i 1 1 tE: S e n t oij 11 , in ear, A p r 1 1 y n", The Set i- 1 ng/ Team Buildirg session will by held on Saturday, April 6, 1991 fr 8 AM to 4 PM at city hall. The faciliKokcr will t_ Arney. 0-farmation was diztmbuted f rom p a a t Et:3t i Vs and the joint meeting with advisory Comm! SL 1 n", ry i9 1991. C it X, n : i r i E , , , . 1 1 c - r e v i e w t - , (1 with tte ':ouncii s om e i r f c r im a t, i o n thrlt W:!:,, I 11t, into the fire chief's annual report regarding the adlditl,:rl and & -S/ 3 INN 0 MINUTES - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE - MARCH 1 9, '991 I! v c . 1 1 E '. , e I t Y kl.v.ow wi,eri j r , w C I v . , u - u wli. th County i`c w t- d c n � d i r C) r M o, 01 0 rl r , ,, t t e 1 t t e r a u 1 n r m c t r. 3 cl a -1 Pt A 6 r - t'r eQ Cu ur c 1 1 me, r Pi y' I 'L I J e IE-, C tnt- r.,; g r l-,m o r.sc n arr,,i Ken -, 3E reed :..:at they wou I ,l preria re a r o c) r i t p r t - - i t c) n 11 T hey wou g o to e r v c e o r z a t i c, , 3 w 1 the r'-; for a " e T n t- Bi r , wo ul d n (, h e I i r - I M c u d, T h I.• nex rn e ( , ;. n g w < - ; s s c h e u - e d for T u e s d a y , Ap, r i 1 1 1 991 b e g , i i r ! F , at 7 PM, at c ity II a v a r , J oth n s o r i a C o un c m b e r Ahrt. were remindekJ that the Smoking Committee will meet prior to the COW meetsing at 6 Pl-i, at city nall. There being no other the mc-eting was adjourned at 1C:15 Pm. Rq;;Pectfu-'ly submitted, lr /, E d lh- U k 1 e Ci ty Ma �7 e r .1 • m & 6,� L A (,'! 0 f S WURST, FEAR50N, LARSON. UNDERWOOD & MERTZ F J4,1T BANK F"-ACE WEST MINNEAPOIA5, MINNESOTA 65402 TCLF-O.E A VA. March 2k"), 1991 817 mr. City City of Mound 534 Ma Road Mound MN 5 Re- 4757 Island View Drive CUP Request Dear Ed: At the Council i iieetingon March 12, 1991, the Council directed me to prepare a resolution with findings to deny the request of Tom Ef fertz for a .ondi tional use permit to construct an oversize accessory building. Based upon the reports of the i lding inspector, the comments of the City Council members present, and basic rules of law, I have prepared such findings. I enclose herewith a resolution of denial for your review, and for inclusion in the agenda for action by the City Council on March 26. If you have any questions, comments, or recoa. changes, please call. CAP: lh Enclosure 53 Very truly yours, Curti:' A. Pearson City Attorney E • RESOLUTION N(). RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST OF TOM EFFERTZ OF 4757 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY RUII.DING WHEREAS, .'c>.t.>>r: 23.407(3, of the , it i• Zoning Code states as "trr '-" i)ist.ricts, no accessory building shall exceed 10% of t r7( 10t area, and in no case exceed 840 scluare feet Of floor area, n d it!t;ri.1 u_e pet :rIit. a WHEREAS, 70111 r fF-• _<-, 47 T" ian 3 View Drive, has applied for a Conditional u e tt.c.r,,rt to tdr:_truct < 3" foot by 36 foot garage totaling 1260 square fec. on I.ot 11, filoc.k ', De �on, and WHEREAS, the apj'l.c.ant's lot are, is approximately 7500 square feet, which would allow a 7�0 sc Foot garage without a conditional use permit, and WHEREAS, the C E t ;t� f , f 3 a rePor t to the Planning Commission for inclusion (n ti:( 2 : � ion ac or•,da on February 24, 1991, and the Building "Staff recommendation. i,; to denv t',F request for a CUP to build an oversize accesjscry structurf-, ba::ed on the premise that the cr i ter is for a CUI' hats not Lc-c n ;, (; and that giant ing the CUP would not be in harmony with the ;�;sniry:; code." and WHEREAS, the Plar:s in <1 C.c>:r i:,ri considered the matter at a meeting te.1,3 on Fekruary 11, 1991, ait3 �:. �l,plicant stated that he needed a full size garac,•e because he na , two ft_ ::ire carp; and a pick -up truck with a plow and he also would like a work t ;en(;r:, �,r:fl 1 further stated he would meet all of the etbacks and there wo i room for visitor parking on his premises, and WHEREAS, the Planning indi,:ated they were considering some amendment to the accessory building section of the Zoning Code and after discussion. indicate(: that they would recommend tC,at Mr. Effertz be allowed to construct an oversi;:(-d acce�,5ory building of 1000 square feet, and La�;ed their recommendation o,i f i ndi n, that. no variances are required and that this tyt.c? of construction is c r i .tent with :;,e neigi,borhood and the structure would he irpr.oved, and WHEREAS, the ma *,:te: was pre<;ented t-() the City Council on March 12, 1991, and the Ci t C'oun(. i'. w u at,. E tc, f ir;d tt at any uniqueness 0 relit my to till,, r�� property or a for t h i s proper ty which would be differFrnt from other proj. -(!„ _in r;;il��r c.irr�ur,�t<an�es, and CP 5 e WHEREAS, the City Council determined that oversized accessory buildings in residential areas do detract from the neighborhood and that* wantiny to build structures of this size because others were inexistence is a failure to understand the planning process, which indicates that we are tryiny to establish as a goal more restrictive standards and that we should riot approve conditional use permits or variances continuing to develop existing non - conforming structures based on outdated zoning standards; follows: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Mound City Council as 1. The application of Tom Effertz for a conditional use permit to construct an oversized attached garage at 4757 Island View Drive is hereby denied for the following reasons: a. The Mound Zoning Code, Section 23.407(3) limits accessory buildings in residential areas to 108 of the lot area and a maximum of 840 square feet. In this instance, under the terms of the ordinance, the maximum size garage which could be constructed is 750 square feet. b. The applicant has not established any reason why his property is unique or different from other properties in the residential zone nor has evidence been presented to the Council that there is a hardship for this property which is any different from any other property in the City. C. Section 23.505.1 of the City Zoning Code establishes criteria for granting conditional use permits and lists various criteria for the Council's consideration. Section 6 indicates that in the opinion of the City Council, they must find that the CUP is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use, and it is our belief that no such showing has been made in this case. d. Section 7 indicates that the Council should find that the use is consistent with the purposes of the zoning code and the purposes of the zoning district in which the applicant intends to locate the proposed use. It is the finding of this Council that oversized accessory buildings on s mal l lots are not consistent with the zoning code and conflict with the policies and goals of the City. e. The construction of oversized accessory buildings in residential districts create and perpetuate into the future large structures which have a tendency to turn into work shops which become body repair shops or other commercial uses & 55 being operated in residential areas, and therefore their construction is inconistent with the intent, goals, and standards established in the zoning ordinance. f. The Council finds that the granting of this conditional use permit would confer on the applicant special privileges that are denied by the zoninu code to other owners of land in the same residential use district. It is therefore the finding of this Council that the granting of this conditional use permit would be discriminatory to all other property owners in th,2 City. 2. The granting of the ! onditional use permit would be detrimental to the public welfare and injurious to other properties in the area since no hardship has been shown by the owner of this property other than his desire to construct a structure which is 59% larger than allowed by the Zoning Code and which would cover approximately 17% of the lot. 3. The Council hereby finds that no showing was made that a hardship exists and that the property owner cannot develop within the Code and that the granting of this conditional use permit would create a use for this property which is inconsistent with the zoning standards and criteria for all other property in the same use district. 4. The Council further finds that if general standards and zoning criteria are waived or relaxed for one property owner, other property owners have the right to expect the same type of treatment or their constitutional rights wouuld be adversely affected by failure to apply the equal protection provisions of the Constitution to all citizens. • &'5 (' PROPOSED RESOLUTION 0 RESOLUTION #91- RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING AT 4757 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE, LOT 11, BLOCK 7. DEVON ADDITION, PID #30- 117 -23 -22 0059 P i3 Z CASE #91 -002 WHEREAS, the C i t y Counc 1 1 h e l d a p u b l i c hearing on March, 12, 1991 pursuant to the Mound Code of Ordinances to consider the Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of an oversized accessory building at 4757 Island View Drive, Block 1, Lot 11, Devon, PID ##30- 117 -23 22 0059; and WHEREAS, all persons wishing to be heard were heard; and WHEREAS, the applicant proposed to construct a 32' x 34' garage addition resulting in a 1,088 square foot structure of ac- cessory use; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R -2 Single Family Residential Zoning District and has a lot area of 7,479 square feet; and 0 WHEREAS, the Mound Zoning Code allows accessory structures In residential districts, subject to Issuance of a conditional use permit, that exceed 840 square feet of floor area or 10% of the lot area; and WHEREAS, the P l a n n i n g Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval due to the findings that no variances are required, this type of construction is consistent with the neighborhood, and the structure will be improved. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized accessory building is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: I. The garage space is to be used by the occupant only. 2. The garage be a maximum of 1 -,000 square feet. 3. The garage addition conform to all the required set- backs. • 057 w RESOLUTION #91- PAGE 2 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for the follow Ing legol ly described property: Lot 11, Block 7, Devon. This Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded with the County Recorded or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Minneso ta Statues section 462.3595. Subd. 4. This shaII be considered as a restriction on how this property may be used. 5. The property owner shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin - ounty and paying all costs for such recordi _l. Proof ,)f recording shall be fl led with the City Clerk. • • � S 7, PUBLIC NEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HFARING TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN OVERSIZED ACCESSORY BUILDING AT 4757 ISIAND VIEW DRIVE �.1P .,G iat AC TA .536- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota will meet in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 12, 1991 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow an oversized attached garage at 4757 Island View Drive, legally described as I.ot 11, Block 7, Devon, PID 130 - 117 -23 22 0r?59. All persons appearing at said hearirig will be given the opportunity to be heard. Francene C. Clark, City Clerk Published in "The 1:6 2 -25 -91 and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of siahjert prt pf t,n 3 -I -91 659' • �s F et. r uts r y i 1 •.' •1991 , , , , C.* a N_9. _4t -492! __IQ0_LfVr3,z. _415! 11!x! Vjjw_.QLiy4. _Q4.Ygln. 61WK_1. t9t1t} . P1Q .t�4- 1.11.1132._44�p�..Q4!' I I1 4!!�l ._ h Ts Qviti :ilxvl_ gS eri9ry @yellgI- na.._NOWL.MNiMA. Sullding Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the appiicants request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow construction of an oversized attached garage. Currently, the zoning code limits the slza of accessory structures to not more than 10% of _ the lot. area, or 840 square feet, this proposed garage exceeds both, The applicant's lot area Is approximately 7.500 square feet which would allow a 750 square foot garage. The applicant Is pro(N)sing a 35' x 36' garage totaling 1,260 square feet. The proposed a0,11tlon will meet all setback requirements. 5taff recci-nenrfed denial of the request for a CUP to build an overstzed accessory structure based on the premise that the crlterla for a CUP has not been met and that granting the CUP would not be in harmony with the zoning code. The aaplica ^t sut]nitted a revised request for a 32' x 34' garage totaling 1.088 square fe.t. The Building Official reviewed three sites which the applicant Previously commented had oversized garages in the area of his house. There are n0 building permit records on file for these garages, therefore the garage sizes cannot be verified, the es- tlm,ted sizes are as folio..$, Lot 5_I ;4t e_5_Ize 3225 Devon lane 12.600 1,056 sq ft 4711 Island view Drive 7,500 1,000 sq ft 4717 Island view Drive 7.500 900 sq ft The CcOMIS 'SlOn discussed the request and Chair Meyer reviewed the CUP process. Chair Meyer opened the Public hearing. APpiict t, Tom EfFertz. commented that he needs a full size garage Uecause he has two full size cars and a Pick -up truck with a •low and he would also like a work bench. He x111 meet ail the setbacks and there will still be enough room for visitor parking. He would like to park ail his vehicles and other equlpment In- side. This addltlon will alsp be accompanled by a $80.000 to :40.000 renovation of the existing house which will raise the Property value. He also stated that if he is not allowed to build a decent size g.,rae, he will be forced to sell the property. The Crrrnfssfon discussed the fact that they are considering an ae'•O n!lrment to this section of the zoning code. The 8ullding Official su,7lested that the garage size Le limited to 1,000 Square feet In or;jer to be consistPrit with the Building Crxle. Mr. Effertz agreed to a 1,000 square foot maximum. W)TION made by Voss, seccKx" by Weiland to approve the CccId itlonai Use permit for an oversized accessory bulid- Ing of 1,000 "Aare feet maxlmurs. Approval Is based on the findings that no varlances are required, this type of construction i± Consistent with the neighborhood, and the structure will be irrl roved. hotlon carried unanlar ousl It was suggested that the use of the garage be limited to s residential use only. This case will be heard by the City Council on March 12. 1991. Mueller commented that the garage door set -uP, limiting the num- ber of gnfage dor>rs, should be considered when reviewing the zonfng code amen,.kner,ts. - V N 1 f I 1 111 1f V , . , t k51a%)A \j yew 1 52 Z o 4 1 SS �sz i5z 90 ry JL %iD 0 4P Y-n o fl & (01 • ?6-C, SS �sz i5z JL %iD 0 4P Y-n o fl & (01 • ?6-C, • ,. (T FY of N 10t IN ) STAFF RECOMMENDATION • )A 1 t P i <ir r, i rill Corryn i ss ion Aaenda of February I IH: Pl inninq Coo *nission, App) icant and Staff FROM: ,Jr>n Sutt,c'r 1_3nd, Bu 1ding Official C,A,> E NO. 91 -002 APPL I( AN7 : lom Effert.r_ L.00AVION: 4757 ` island View Drive LEGAL Devon, B i ` -ck 7. Lot I 1 DESCRIPTION: PIU ##30 -117 -23 -22 0059 SU13JFCT: COnd itionaI Use Permit for Oversized Accessory Building ZONING: R -2 Single Family Residential JACKGR09140 The applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for thc� construction of an oversized accessory structure, the ap- pli:ant proposes to remove the existing attached garage and con - struct a new 35' x 36' attached garage. Zoning Code Section 23.407;3) limits accesst_,ry buildings in residential areas to 10 Of the lot area and a rr 3x i mum of 840 square feet. Also Ord on the survey is a proposed porch on the south, or lCabr,,; of the house. A variance would be required for this ad- dition, but the applicant has not requested the Planning Commis - ,ion to review tf,is at this time. COMMENTS The proposed JCC essory b u i l d i n g (35' x 36') totes i s 1,260 square feet. T17c lot area as shown by the surveyor is 7,479 square feet, st.iff would round this numher up to 7,500 square feet. At t" m.'ix imum a 1 1 o ab 1 e size of 10% of the lot area, the accessory huildifal is limited tc� 750 square feet. The proposesI Is in of what I s a 1 I nwe ?ri by the zon I ng code i n area for ac,ces- s, pry tu I I d i nq, and are,,j of I of coverage. 6_� &I 0Z I on Case No. 91 002 RECOMMENDA Page 2 Is to deny the request for a CLIP to build an structure. Based on tht- premise that the a CLI his not been met and that granting the CUP t- in he l r! Tk , J - ly with the zoning code. NOTE Th I s w I I I be t ear by the C I ty Counc I I on March 1 2, 1991 . Pub J ic, hear ing notices were rT"i led t(3 property owners within 350' Of the subject property. p j &0 C • � 11 [� A 2310 CITY OF MOU ND CITY Of W)UND PART I II Case No. I _CO2 is Date F led I `u F _$200.00 CONDITIONAL_ USE PERMIT APPLICATION PLANNING >i ZONING COMM ISS1ON t -i t:)t?c' or Pr -10 t the following inform3t ion. ) r �r �:G >t r t Y _ 1 .� I L (A R (� ht t C !j Block A[i ff t ion o P10 No. 30 Corner's Oay Ph one S� S Owner's Address a+�`AiIE �.� f:ry4r` > �C�c F ap i y1 Ce2o� E A App Icant's Name (if other than Owner) 1.> ( M4 S E F NEIL % Z Address �7S 7 _ -fs_' AA-t1 �IrL,ot.i?. Day f'hc,ne Existing Use of Pro p er ty : E_s_! L?f!1. - .7't (.._ Zoning District Has an application ever been for z „ning, variance, conditional use Permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? yes no If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s) -_. ----- (Copies Of previous resolution_, mljsl. )�'CC�mr�jny this appl ication. ) I certify that al 1 of the ahove st Jtf,,'1, nt5 acid the statements contained in any re(jc4ired Papers or plans to hO sut)mittecd herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in Or uc >on the premise5 described In this +pplication by any aut horized officia of the City of Mound for the purpose of i nspec:t i nn, or of post i nq, ma i nt,3 i n i nc_) <irud rerim,v i ng such notices as rrk ,3y be required by law. Apf31 1c<3nt's Signature_ ___ 1.; ".�.fsr• -� . a Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: , Planning C(ynnission hecorrrrt�nci.�tic�rz _ Drlte Council Action: .7esca 1 ut i on No. _ Date (,r,)ePy CON D|I|UN A/ U�)[ Pf�M/l APPL,/LA{/&N Pa9t Two Cas/ No. (- A^ A, ", i. ^ | x`tur"ut/on r~ques�,d bo)ow. a ��te p|an as described in Part I/ '.\ "''�'ownen� �ch�Uu|e Providin� rea�:,onat)}e guarantees for th ` .|,.|. u. ,ne c must be provided before a hear(ng w||� [on�itimna| U--p Perm|t iy remuested: / k of c (svcc.ry>:_ _AAP UfP ('vrrent zuning an� 0p�ign��ion in the future Land U' �) - - ------ Use p.an �or Mound - C. i' A dove|opmcnt scho�uie sha|| be att,jched to thjs app}ic t| providing reasonable guoran �ecs for the comp)etioo of the on posed deve|ucxnent, pro- 2' Estimated cost of the project D. Dens|ty (for res/ dent |a) de on|y); -- |' Number of structures; / 3 Dwelling ' *e ny units per structure: / a' number per unit type: -- eFf/ c { ency___-_____ | beUroom ______ 2 bedroom__- - --_ 3 bedromn / 3 Lot '-� ------ ' o area per ��}�ing un�t�_ 4 Total lot area: '/�1� � -' ' ` ''/ ~, ( � � ��7f -- o / - ��-�.��r�_- ~� . /�4� / y/ E. E/fect Of -the-Proposed U�,e: List imvacts the proposed o»o will h on property in the vicin|ty, inr|uUing, bu� not |imited to traf� no y�, |ight, �nx�kc/odor, P);31 king. and drscri�e the steps t k 'c° i mitigate or e|imiate the imp`�rts. a en to n � � I rmC'O-- Sk 0 GAAAC,9 QRtVE�.✓�' 3(. ' x a S 46 cl Im - �E � >E -- 10 - I A SC • • LL. ql--OOZ A at -e • W • • • �0« IOoP � / C1 / J f! 0 / -2 C)� - l Yu Y rD y l� �', 30 7# ZONING _MF Nj � 9 ? ::7 j APP'LICANT: C+—Z 6 o 5 e. pes LOT: 3LK AD!)Nt RD f 7-7 ZON E : _ , �� _ Z_ REQUIRED LOT AREA: 4 EXISTING LOT AREA: 7 I's 19 -el Of 4 6 1 T BA C K 5 Ar HANOVER a. r Rf) _ d . FRONT: 5 • 12 SIDE: D 9 8 7 e d -3 -T- SIDE: "51 i t (49 REAR: 15 feet LAKESHORE: 50 - feet ISLAND viEw OR EXISTING PROPOSED SETBACKS FRONT: Q9 Q CITY OF MOUND SIDE: rn�i 40 S I D E : REARS 0 09 Z7. - LAKESHORE fn �Onc�)) DATE,; BY t Proposed Resolution Case #91-004 RESOLUTION RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION FOR THE WEST 45 FEET OF THAT PART OF LOTS I AND 2" BLOCK 2, BAY RIDGE, PID #23-117-24 33 000 P&Z CASE NO. 91-004 WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a lot frontage and =''.= ' a." setback var.unce to a//ow construct |cm of a two story 20'4° x 24' addition for the West 45 feet of that part of lots l and 2° block 2^ Bay Ridge, P|D #23-117-24 33 0009. 6343 Bayridge Road; and WHEREAS, the subject property is located within the R-1 � Single Family Zoning District which according to Zoning Code Sec- tion 23.604.5 requires a lot area of |O,OOU square feet, side yard setbacks of 6 Feet and 10 feet due to the lot width of 45 feet and; and . ' WHEREAG, the subject property has inadequate street frontage due to the fact that is does not abut a dedicated public street ` as required by Zoning Code Section 23.408, 6ubd' 8; and WHEREAS, the existing principal structure is setback ?.6 feet from the west side property line requiring a ,4 Foot side _ . yard setback variance; and ` ' WHEREAS, the Planning Commission |.as reviewed the request ` and does reco.^nend approval to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. ' ` NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Co(jncil of the City of Mound, Minnesota: |, The City d_..)es hereby authorize the street Frontage variance and the side yard setback variance of .4 feet for the property located at the west 4 feet of that part of lots ! and 2^ Block 2, Bay Ridge, P|D #23-117-24 33 0009, 6343 Hayr|dge Road, subject to the +o||u~ing conditions: a> The proposed garaqe add/tiun be shown on the survey, b) lhe upp|icant supp|y the City with a copy of the ease- ment to Bayridge Roa0 anri this eosrment be reviewed by the City Engineer- and City Attornpv with the applicant responsible for anv ad,litinn�| fees in excess of the 0 variance review fee, _/C Prmposep Resolution Page 2 Case #91-004 2' The City Council authorizes the street frontage variance and side yard setback variance and authorizes the alterations yet forth below, pursuant t Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. ]. It is determined that the livability of the resioeptia| property will be improved by the authorization of the al- terations to a nonconforming use of the property to afford the owner reasonable use of his )and. as follows: a. Tn construct a 20'4" w 24' two story addition with a tuck under garage and a basement under the garage, 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described ' property: The West 45 feet of that part of Lots l and 2^ Block 2, Bay Ridge~ lying South of a line hereinafter referred to as "Line A°, said "Line A° being described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot : thence 60uth along the East line of said Lot 2 aa distance of 169,68 feet to the point of beginning of said "Line A"; thence deflecting right 90 degrees to the West line of said Lot 1, and there ending; ALSO that part of said Lots . and 2 lying East of said West 45 feet. South of said "Line A", and Northerly of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence South along the East ||ne of said Lot 2 e dis- tance of 169.68 feet to the point of beginning of said line to be described; thence deflecting right 45 degrees a distance of 30 feet; thence deflect'ng right 21 de- grees 31 feet to the East }|ne of said West 45 feet. and there ending. 5' This variance sha|i be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Min- nesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (|)' This shall be considered a restriction on how this prooerty may be used' 6' The property owner shall have the respons|b, } ity of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for sucA recording. The building permit shall not be issued until Proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. 7 s •t rr w a r EJ Vro MAR 2 5 1991 _t 1 f, J')M' and JuRr's J. JClSZC4Ct, b"b" and wife, as oerrre of tAa I ' Rao t:v - t. of 1cd in Btrxrapin Cmmty, Mnnae daeeribea set J Lo'-e 1, 2, 3 and 4, Clock 1. Bwq According to the asp or plat t!� v,xf on file or of rpcord in t2e office of the kegistar of Deeds 1 �� Sn a:d far 9eauepin County, Riacssota DC f . ^.5 IX Cn AND Cam". aeon V* property at a daacribod the follow - i: e.ar nts whieb shall be for the '*refit of and t'sding upon the present ewe tle:eof, t`elr helrs and u '", tad Wor, all parties and persons claim - !.- der t.e -n, ad aFrll run with the lands t 1. An easement fa,' foot and vehicle travel and for rater installation, Ia:, u,' ra, iereaOaL for the berafit of all of the al,ave doscr!lM+ lots over a ,C ,y o;, t,`A fellow rg described tracts ".e'. I ,o:"tior. of Lots 2 a*d ;, Y.;uc'. 2, try Ridde, lyirg wit:dn a ci-cle a rafius of 30 f"t, the con , or cf which is a point on the Feat 1! of said Lot 2 and lFo.(8 feet South of the Nortt,caet corner of ea:.', lot 2, and also tt,at rorticm of said Lots 2 and 3 ly:• `o:th of sW circle. 2. An ea +nrer,t to- foot travel for the terrfit of all of VLo above des- , . ".+•d L;'.s over and rq•m tLe ft"Imeng descr7l'od tracts no rest 15 fee'. at lot 2 a-d the West 15 feo'. of Lot 3, Flock 2, Bay )t;,t,a, lylrj Swath of the a'.ave described easement, 3. An site -ant for never installation, nwpair and rrrlaronent over and r the folla+rirg descried tract: • n.a Ea+t 15 feet of Lot 2 and the tweet 15 feet of Lot 3, Block 2, Bar lodge. L. An et�ormnt for utility pt::-,•osea over and Won the following described t s : ?.a Fret > feet of Lot L and the West 5 feet of Lot 1, Blocx 2, Bay hide, IN iilINLSS F?�JiEOF, we have hereunto set r+ur harts and seals this day of Hay, 1963. .r. the Frew a ofd '21 a1rD tax '. A-E CF KTNN' S OTA) Deed Tax duo hers+ ) SS. ✓^ On tills r `dkv of Y,sy, 1963, before me, a Notary Public within and fa:^ said rA=rry, personally sr- ,eared CARL F. JOHICM and JFwttE•"TE J. JOF:NSON, to re ktovn tr be the persona described in and whc executed the fokwgcirg instrv- r,art; arxi tcwnovl.dged that tfey executed the ease as their free act and deed, yw. r ITT N. a 7w - + T // H.-•.:.^ .. 1 n4 y Putllc, Aennep in County, Kann. (h: "ARM. SFAL) t to,r,r .a- b,,� +•s. :" ' k�7b'�orniseion Er�i.^ss Filed for reeer'd M Me I day of J'a ♦D IM a♦ fwt0 s'sloek A.X. r � fie MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION March fl, 1991 Case No 9 t -004: Brent ._a Gayle, Th Gay ornt 6343 t3 a r 1 45 of that part,__of t_�ts _i _b...2L. 81ork 2, t3a_Y Ri d_ge �p 10 23 -i 17- 24 33 0009. VARIANCE: I NADt:( 11ATE _STR FRONTA . Building Official, Jon Sutherland, explained that the subject far o)e'rty does not abut a p u b l i c street. Zoning Code Section 2, • 4 08 Subd. U states no building permit shall be issued for any lot or parcel which does not abut a dedicated public street. He also reviewed the setback variance required to the west side property line of .4 feet. Staff recommended approval of the variance request as the proposed addition will enhance and allow reasonable use of the proG)erty, subject to the following conditions 1. The proposed garage addition is not shown on the survey, It may require a slight variance t the west side. The ap- plicant must provide this information on the survey. 2. The applicant supply the City with a copy of the easement to Elayrldge Road and this would be reviewed by the City En- gineer and City Attorney with the applicant responsible for any additional fees in excess of the variance review fee. Welland questioned the location of the sewer and water lines. The placement of the proposed attached garage was discussed. Mueller expressed a concern with turn - around space. It was determined the turn around spa�_ is not ideal, but adequate for the applicants needs. Mueller also expressed a concern with drainage onto the adjoining lot to the west, the grade drops ap- proximately 5 to 7 feet. Staff agreed this issue needs to be addressed, and could be addressed within the context of the variance. Mueller questioned the hardship. MOTION made by Voss, seconded by Clapsaddle to approve staff recormnendatlon for approval incItAing conditions as stated. In addition. staff is to use all resources available to ensure that proper drainage is maintained at the west side of the Improvement. Motion carried 6 to i, those in favor were: Clapsaddle, Thal, Meyer. Voss, Weiland, Clapsaddle, and Hanus; those opposed were: Mueller. Mueller stated his reason for onpct, 1 ng being th it adequate is hardship is not shown, and a need for an extra double car garage is not shown. This case will be hera by the City Council on March 26, 1991. 67 7 C� F V I N 1( STAFF RECOMMENDATION • 0A I t Pk - inni nq Commi ss ion AqE of March I I, I jcij I (.): P lann i riq Cofmi i ss i on, App I i cant and '- f FROM: Jon 1 .)tjthe.r - lancl, Hui I d i nq O f f i c i a l CAbE NO. 910(4 APF1 I CAN T: Brent & Gayle Thomton LOCAT 6343 Bayridge Road I F 6AL W. 45' of thi part of Lots I & 2, Block 2, DF I I' T I ON: Bay Rid(4e, PID #23-1►1-24 33 OOo9 �')LJBJECT: V,jriance: Inadequate Street Frontage ZONING: P--I Single Family Residential BACKGROUND This par ce I does not abut a puln I i c street. Zoning Code Section 23.40,9, `j(jbd. 8 states no bLJi Iding permit shal I be issued for any I of or parce I wh i Ch does n._)t abut a ded i cated pub I i c street. As stated in the variance reque—.3t, the property abuts a p r i v a t e l y owned and rrki i rita i ned dr i veway shared by f i ve property owners. rhe ea-,t entry and walkway is covered by a roof and is subject to sethack rec-itjfrementc Therefore, this property is also noncon- forming by reason of setbacks. The existing conditions are as follows: Y J r d F'_35 Yard Wp<�f �)icle N.W. Corner We c)i(.Je S.W. Corner 0_3 F. xistinra Pe.qu i r ed P t C k Setback - 1 1 6' 9. 1 10 9.w 10 t C' t u okay variiince needod .4' vijri�jnce nooded • • , ,t of f Case No. 91-004 RE COMME N T I t)N >t,rt r rc�('cxnrnend-�, approvij I of ttie var i ance request as the proposed jri( i i 't i on w i l l enh.ince and a I I ow reasonab I e use of the property, if t: t:) tfW too lowing conditions: I l he pr(;)poseci garage addition is not shown on the survey, it rn;iy require a slight variance to the west side. The ap- p I i cant mu-,t prov i de th i s i nforrnat i on on the survey. I t'l ?PP I i cant SUPP I v the C i ty w i th a copy of the easement to Fkiyr i clge Road and th i s wou I d be rev i ewed by the C i ty En- gi neer and City Attorney with the app Iicant responsible for <jr,v i:ldd i t i ona 1 fees i n excess of the var i ance rev i ew fee . NOTE Th is cci e w I 1 be heard by tt,e C i ty Counc i I on March 26, 1 9 . The abut t i ny ne i ghbors hive been not i f i ed . • (07(/ ,- IOU OU Cliy ' OF MI on U 1 9199 C\I Y 0[ MVUN0 �]4| M, jvw.x``I Rc*d Fee_ Moonu, Mm ��964 ------ VAR IANCE APPLICATION PLANNING & ZONING COM MISSION (p|(-Iase type or print the fo|)owing informati on. > Add/es5 o, 5u�jrc� =ruperty_ �+/-------------- ------------ Owner 's Nl)nie Day Phone Owner' Address_ 4 - 1 .1 3Y , _ ()0 Princina} Building ( ) Accessory Building Appl icant's Name ( (f other than owner) Address Lot 3 o � � Add \tIon Existing Use of Property; Zoning �\ Day Phone' B)ock P|D Nu'_=^� Has an app }i cat ion ever been made for roning, variance, conditional use permit` or other zoning procedure for this property? yes ( ) , no ( >. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s) (copies of previous resn}utions must acccwnpany this application). VARIANCE AEVUi6TE0 FOR: ()0 Princina} Building ( ) Accessory Building direction setback setback VARIANCE requested required REQUESTED Front Yard: ( N 6 [ W ) ft . _ Ft. ft, Rear Ya,(�J: ( m 5 E W ) _ ft. _ ft, _ ft, Lake Front; ( N S E W ) ft. _ ft' ft' 6idv Ycird: ( N 1 � E w ) ft' ft. Ft, Side Yar4: < N S F W ft. ft' Lot Size: sq ft - -- -- --- — sq ft _ ---------- sq ft�� 76 0 nARlAw(E APPL|[A[ u |ON Case N xq\' Page 2 '- \. Aeal�on for request - TL f�A` C_ A� A1'�'-- -- / '— ----------' /' Does the prcsent use of the property conform to all regulations for t''e zoning district 'In which �t is iocated? Yes (»�> No ( > /� no s�e.ify ea,x non-confmrming usc: ` ` , 9. Uu t^e existing structures ccvnp)y with a|! area height bulk, and seth�cK rcOu|ations for the zoning dis ~ trict �n `hich it IS located? YP� �~�. No ( >' If no, snec.fy each non-conforming ---------'- 4^ Which unique phys|ua| characteristics uf the subject property prevent its A reisonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning too rarrow topography soil ( / too sma)| ( ( / �om_sha| |mw > drainage sub-surface < > shape other: ' other; specify Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land ' f — the zoning ordinance was am Yes ( ), No C*0. If yes, explain__ 6. W,4s the hardship created by y other man-nude change, uch as the re|oc� / �iun of a road/ Yes p� No ( ) If yes exp�a|n` ' ~ ^ , J^)�l�1�_I��/�� /' Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance pec >ior only to the /'rop.`rty descr[Ued in this petition? Yes ( ) N R~) , If ,^o^ \ ist some ot'��r t ie� "hich are s /mi iar | " af f /l'� FA:A ( cortify th.'' a|) of tne Jhnve statements and the sta<cm~nts cnntaineU |n any reouired papers or p|ans to be submi LteU herew ith are true and ac curate. | consent tu fhe entry in or th Prenises Uc in this a;p}|retioo by wny autoorirpU offici o f the City of Mound for the purpms of iospecting, or of posting. maintai" � �n� nd revmving such notices �s ma� Le renuirpd by |aw. v oApplicant's Date Signature L7 /m ci E RECE;VLO W 2 1 199 ( I I r. • • I t4 4 91t c • N. ti 4 k itw GORDON R. COFFIN v' k 'LAND SURVEYOR AND PLANNEi1 'i, � 3025 WATERTOWN ROAD LONG LAKE MINN b a J S 6 ', i G st r It •. r„ - n :! ..! ; a i . .y _ T .`rP , 12- 26.-69 ; Doscriptiona for_ CPri F. Johnson in .Lots 1 And 2, Block 2, Bay Ridge �.5. t�3rn3t;in County, MdnnAeotA 1. n•Pt pnrt c° i.ots 1 An 2, Block , Ppy Rij-3, lving North of thQ following- 6Ascrib -iil lin3: ,'Comroncing At th4 North��^st corn of said Lot 2• thqncA �, South along thr3 F4at; line of avid Lot .'_ A dIA Ance of 169.68 fiat to th9 'point ,of „tr30nninp of said line to be dhscrib+�d; thence deflecting - right 90 to thl - West linn of said :.ot 1, and there Andirp. r 2. That pA:t o° .ot : , Flock 2, Be•; Rir'.ge, lyin? :not of th'? 'r;3sL !•5 feet Of said lot, ":'And South3rly of aline cescribed As follows: Comm ncine at the 1�orth aRt cornRr of Said lot; thoncA South along tho East ling of said lot s a distAnco of 169.6�jfeet to th9 point of b�ipinninp of said line" to be des�'� >'" cri }od; thor.c dnflbri tnp riprt 45' a distAncA of 30 feet; thence deflAeting,`�� right 21'31' to t?-,A r,�r� li�.� cf sr!ic '� t Brat, And there pndine. T r i3. .ho Wlat f ^ ^t of that pare of .ots 1 And 2, Block 2, EAy Addeo, lving South or .a link hpr9inafter r3ferre6 t0 A !!:. " r! !! "L ino A , seta Line A being a<� dASCribd, 'as follouA:;i`Cor`n {ire `L N t�ASt cornRr of said Lot 2, - . th , )nnn f.cuth along th•3 :.ant ...r.• o: rid :.ot 2 a distance of 161 . 3 feet to th9 po!' ,t �f b^A,ir.r.in.� of ^ni : "Lin- , "; t1:�rne deflecLinp ri,-ht 9�,° to th) WRA ling of said Lc i FnC trnrn A „in ^; A_ that � Prt of snid -o*, l Fin < 1'.:nt :.nst of said West 4: fe -t, South ,. of said "Lir: A", and N or+ },Pir' of A lir,n discrib?d as follows: Corsoncing r : ; at th'3,, North3pst corrn3r, of said Lot 2; thoncp Smith along the East lin3 of said In 2 a d i's tFrce of 169,68 feat to th point. of beginning of sAid liri �> t to h,, d- Forib. ?d; thmvc r?eflectinp rip-ht 45 A distance of 30 fact; thonce •, ; d•3fi'�cLinM1 rif;nt 21"31' to th :moist line of said West 45 feet, and there ending. 2 -19 -90 : r jQ 0 ' r) �� <b i r1 c� ' I Cc J- n 4'113 /� ( (C ,� Su s U l S I@ rl llo.5 { ' r ri e P stiff oP��E KELLEY 15 KELLEY ENGINEERS a SURVEYORS lk LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA Up &.w lokLE - 6(f It" DATE : SEPT. 25, 1959 b gat Ir O R c � ,\ K of el 4Ar fil4 8 4� w Y/ ■ LAi4lF5HORE_'.-5th - feet ( HAt_S T, , D , S or Minnotris' 33 EXISTING & PROPO SED SETBACKS FRONT: DATE :a__4p�_ ClTy BY: 0 (26) Mbund 828 34 R M --------- )a— ;RIDGE 11-- r.. SIDE: SIDE: REAR: LAKESHORE: (24) ADDRESS: I IC ANT : LUT BL K, Z j E REQU I PF D A R EA F XISTING i 4REA: )N _T �7' S I DE SIDE: RE AR: 15 feet EXISTING & PROPO SED SETBACKS FRONT: DATE :a__4p�_ ClTy BY: 0 (26) Mbund 828 34 R M --------- )a— ;RIDGE 11-- r.. SIDE: SIDE: REAR: LAKESHORE: (24) m!lap A' (d A R A 741 Mir, K 'j, '+ ,, 'r wit 'rf;! 1, j! I r lr , r at j j t Y"k M A K JV 10jr k, '4 1 4 [)(j" Mr [)i - , r i ri (I t ny i r i I t , i I' J, 1',x91 ( 1_3p(A o in record is at T I t was lit i t ""ml 1 1 40 a cp 1 1 i ng i s i n a sub",maaro i r i t I � i,i z, i r (1, j s r 'am ano tu t_1, i F. dum I nq i S unf it f or huw.3r) 1, itl i t a f i or, ,I' cju ed th i 5 s i t"a- i (m ar I i ,t b I (-,)w: 0 Adetjoj�jt e S j t i on f "c i I i t i e5 gar e not provided. State Hui I d i rig Code ( SHC ) `'motion 4 7 15.U200, SuKL C states, in p " r t t hat e a c h fri i I Y d w P I I i n q S h a I I have a t I exi 0 n e water clo5et , one lAvatary. one kitchen type sink and one Wthtuh or Stunwer to Wet the 1"nic reouir of sanita- tion and per - r;, - )riaj hyqirq-)P, I f)e on 1 Y 1,_ Jva 1 `""Y tn Wtv stjb- ejrlt i a I I y removed by YOIJ , trt" w I 1 5 , w,istl t ri i n and Fbit litub or SNomm have bv-n r ennvod. 2 the only W, closet is nn the second f 100r, the stairway and surrounointl wAl Is givinq have been rprTi(jved Witt, a() a I UrT1 i ritim I - , - jcJf lt'r s ( t, i rl i t I a T ti i S 1 Si hazcjrd(jkjs rind untmf e. The F)rirt it ion voll Is tw"Proat th dwe i 1 i rxj that hive been r "mavnJ %ve I of t e I et I r i rm 1 aq i I i nJ ar'il ex r Q i r -1 rA 1, n a f r do) t i o r) d i t i (j n Inv proper rurava I or r eotnNyt ion mult be as aVOVovPd by tho Vwe E I er t r i (.,j 1 1 r i r �oe c t cj r 1n con j ijn i on w it i t h i a ; r � I I mv it 4. The Mni; , ,d /(:,f) i r 1,3 ( j <,,!, 1 M Q i t V C nde proh i b i t the Bm IdIrm Oft in ial frum is PrVj the reg p mrmits 0) cor- 1101 rect thp Wove Onnir 4:" j r"j tjn4 w? CC)f & t iqn,. OtTer cor-, re(�tioris w<_)!jld be by ft-t Hiji Idir,cl in addition to t h I i'3t FAI i f t W. fn i t q 0 "1 lot be i O%Uwj. M;a� M(,,;r)r1 i,ity must be oht 'jinF.d fcar ttic? are' t ° E'Qu1rf'd, to ISS( --jo a bui Idlnq it existed m�3v have been in a h a b i t a b l e 1,c>1_1 commencing the demolition work in viola - t r 1 i -, i f ;r, tit, I d i r(a lode ( OBC) Section 301 and Mound City t 1 � )r1 " I)t) : I '� t3f 1 3 10 : 00 . However. YOU have caused th i S t t,i n,�, I;,.n in a h.jbitable cc.�ndition and that you rlv I in pric7r to creating this condition. t o , ,.,t— r � , � , e r r f t � sut�>standard, unsafe conditions must be cor- - r F . t t w i t t+ i n of the date of the i ssuanc a of the required rlu i i ii i "Iq , �I I �,mt) i r�ca . mechanical and electrical permits, i n the t: vF�r,t the M(' C it v Counc i I would al low these permits to be is < >ut'<1 thrl�kjq h th- F variance process. Any «,"< ur�.inr, y , ��f tt i, dwe I I i ng i s not a I I owed by th i s department `'n �'� r �,iF'��r'c'y is in v i o l ,,)t i on of SBC Section 1 305. 0400 anti 1 . I t)UI_i, �Wd Mo'.,nd C i ty Code Sect ion 1005. 1 e.ft,r refer <iny quest ions you may have to this department. i1e• Lam;' `� n I ,nd Hui Official ,I(1 : F " C( Ed `ihuk I e, City Manager ( r,j i g Mertz, City Attorney Jerry Babb, Eire Marshal A) To l l akson , State Electrical Inspector Jeff E,itenour: 6012 West 39th Street St. Louis Park, MN 5`416 • & F L/ ;f. CITY OF MOL,, - j CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. none COMPLETED 3-19-91 3:30 ADDRESS 5656 1 " et It Blv OWNER Jeff Ritenour TELEPHONE NO. 00I IN(i PLUMBING RI X SITE INSPECTION F HAMIN(A MECHANICAL EXCAVJGRADINGIFILLING Ir4l,1t11. A11()N WATER HOOKUP LAKESHORE/WETLANDS A[ L HP METER SET/TURN ON COMPLAINT I` I !4AL SEWER HOOKUP FOLLOW-UP SEPTIC INSTALL, SEPTIC FINAL E %10t SEPTIC, MAINT 1`1HE ; PLUMBING FINAL IFS COMMENTS: Site visit with owner to review existing C "11d; t i oll�;. fleds are set 'up on 'first floor, , "Ild ()n �;econd floor. sta irway --to-, second - fYodi _ h b44k4n r4e an alu .:ladder4-,, set--in-Its this is the only bath - - i - n -"- the __ hou s e - - " , and __ t - he -- bilthtub and sinK have been removed, only the toilet pj ng an _so me wa. reiiia I n. Open P111111hing ev t r i ( I wiring and Nu guardrail. ...... at ... ,__xQugh_ ___opening__.nf___o1d.._ S t a I I Y. 'remporary wall holding up second floor joists. Wires exposed? owners have moved in without consultatir.T11 (if t01T__ stated to Building . fjfficiaj___.J --_ by earl . v April. Several hazards have been identified ---------- and Stop work order confirmed with owner and no work to continue. - Staff 10 A ff6f fi - 6 Y _ 'a _S_ tO how 9taf f wil I proceed and coil t act--owner ASAP-; _ WORK SATISFACTORY. PROCEED PHOTO TAKEN CORRECT WORK & PROCEED CORRECT WORK. CALL FOR REINSPECTION BEFORE COVERING CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOuRS, INSPECTOR WILL RETURN STOP ORDER POSTED. CALL INSPECTOR, INSPECTION REQUIRED, CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS, call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. Owner/Contr. on site Jeff Ritenour A IY n -4 -4 CC E MINOlf !a Of A M1 I. I I NG OF I Ht KAJN0 A0VI!A)WY MANNING COMM ISSI(,)N K.jrch 11, 1991 C,vio N, 91 00S. Jeff & Roxanne ..R.lt.eti,our,---5�65�� Bartlett Blvd Mock '14, 1 ot I I to 2- 16, MOund Bay, , l,D 1?j _Park P 0027. -1-I.- - . - _. - 1 7 , 1 - 14 - -, — VAR I , AN(,F 10 A NON CONI ORM ING PROP-ERTY AND A VAR I ANCE OF Is. 5 0 1 Ifif Pf (ejll?f 1) 30" F WMT YARD SF FOR THE ADD N T- JACM 0 GARMA 7 , 1 BACK DI IO OF A A _____ ._11.___ _ ___ ho ioirpct -'It f, i'31 , .)()() � ht_ rlancj, reviewed the stat o f tt pr- ( li�. r t y, I tit' 1 existinq pr incipi3l structure is setback 11.5 feet from this fron proper I -v I the requit'ed Setback is 30 feet. In i,ldlt iv)11, the lowest floor is 1.55 feet below the minimum f lo:,)r el overt ion ill kDwed by C itY Code Section 300: 15, Sjbd. 9a. , whl(J) re viir es �) mininvim bul !dircj el evert i.gin of not less than 93,3*l let_ "In any lots rip,jritin t0 L,Ike Minnetoni,,j. The existing 1-wilst. f e I e t i c) r) 14, 931.55. It Is Staff's Position that the h,vt"!-Ient Is ' to I;f2condary floc�dlng by under- ground w,, tr-,jvel jr) tt,i,jt- the frePboard or safety margin Is not fr ttle 100 ye,ir flood level to the basement floor. `toff recorrmendc,cj, tt in tt)e event the Planning Commission or City Cotincil would of this "�J staff would recjuest the 51A of a "hold harmleizs" Statement from the appi leant to thf! City �)5 approvecl by Itif city attorney, and that this would he i l l Id I t I onal r equ i rem(?rit % I i he I ow: t ec l 1. the oritire r,m . 1(ji5t 5i I 1 r ;3to area be exposed for proper inspt. and if)y to be in poor Condition be tf. with �jr)f)r'Oved by the current building cocle. 2. the e.xisiting wal I C,30ti€.a he Properly filled with approved inl,tjkjtion aja bel;t, be r(l,i-,onably acc _cr npl I Shed. 3. A he<jt l o") cal tau lc 1 hY a rlu if led merhijnicaj contractor t:'(.' 'Ut)(ni t t $'d to veri the f urnace i nstal I -d or to be sta I I cad, Is rjr of) er I Y S i z v-d. I n _ 0 • M I C a ge 9 1 - Ci C6 I t. hint to I n I ""qi if v I it r in i A) t I I ri t r io� 1 (it r1< at f to ht, ted ind r J P I I t kin 5 "I con ` () c) r t rn rC-) i)t f I ; l. t r % it r•r 04 5 A " 1 ht' Wit All r)q Wit arm nywi t je t 4 n t ti i r r o n t h , Al ? I, t I j I I r I P I. r ! i i: k f i t I r hP L t 1 OL, k of I , ant I I f- i t W.15 not, 5ound I r q I, t I r k j I WOU I d ho) Irld and 0 "A - i n " t ; r ' 4 ) t i I a k f' t c-) r) � I �t-irlip he i n S t I I I ° (-I . 1 1 t : j r A J t ` f t R i t , 0 o 1 1 j i numl his S i t "at i on a"I ir% en t I on s thf r V T i t o Pon (1) the tunuhip and Ina k e I I Vah 1 0, V( �, ', i ( : ) f i t! ( ' t flu I d ; r a I Off i C I . 1 1 if ho was comfortable with t inn I rut t I "n r d1Cj , I (a) 1 he E1U11tjlrirl Of i clal cfYi0entt,_ on thr 1 , i ( " r i of I f i t , f , t r i v t u r e arKJ ret tor r t?d t C) t fie cond 1 t, i ons i n h is I I (_ � po r ( ,If ), vi2 ) . ! ty. i ("t I 1 4 , 1 i:, r I of t.-ti Pr I at 11 W W11 Cox iple owls d 1 sCLV;5e(j . T ha I •ommont"o that. thp applic,iqt f 1 A StNted to him t h d I he wodld 4r "f t ( I ;, 1 , Ji. t',- 1 t i q I It, I 11 V f"T M I I i:q ; f coriditior of M011()N rr t) y Von_ st' by Mueller to deny the Var Once rAmpiest . 11:r j" r , ' ' " j f "' I a (r ; O '""? "Pt icle frnr "Hat lqker" rt'kit ir t t I ( i �,, (t,Iirlc i 1 irir i, )n 7irl tt r ( rit (_)n hvr,r et 'V . ) '' f g 0 n 1 q I f p ' 1 t 1 q 1 t 1 " I I I rw)ve Wrvhir a —., I f rAit 1 . . r; ti j ! r, j , f)r (j i rt,,, f , to ; I I , I 1 '1 t I , , j 1 F Ks- I irn jnq: It, Kj r w:Q Irv; to vra 1()()t t1li-, j i(tri. I - , ''111 ,. -t i f4 t 'y, 1 t t. I . , f i i t ,/ V 11 1`_1 E 401 • 11 6� 1, i 11 1 M i I ?! j! #-, + i rl , ( ) r (.) y e� ( I . r i ( j t rt'lzji�rir� to the fl oor e I e v,i t Ion .Jf)y !A r e w ir r t t i,an t, f m jje I I ear. 0 Mot I vLjt. e the Cotjric I I Ord im3n( hec,iij of the- In 11(ich tvirl shafle, the fact r)et C it y P( ter) t I a I t r r 1 5- no 501 ilt ion for the t C, j s e 9 i ", C , p I - -in I rTIF) I i e s th m r corTIM(2nred t I) a t T W Or(KI)t . e skj, - ad(- I kj�j t e hods I rig I s 4 J u -3 e regulations an b e t- v e I part o the Planned ni flit -r t t i) r it. this situation where it does fnprove it may not be tt- h, t -v t t tit us f' regulations, Mot Ion ic,jr I c r t of 2 , T I"'OSe Jr) favor of the denial were: VG 5 5 , We I I ij r id Meyer and Hanus Tha and clapsaclidle Id IF corver R t e ( j . ) ( i h i r , I ft-, don I a I be there 1 5 no m dr n f i! I d,,. f - I , -) ) .3,._., c J T s U i t h I n Hous I rig Ord I nance . 1. to i'� j on M, ir c h 7 i 9`)l .7 � � 11y-1 f ri t )r f�lct the str is n T) f I o n 300:15 9tj , he does f I t h, T i. t -'E C I N/ I mpri- )vecl . 1. to i'� j on M, ir c h 7 i 9`)l .7 � � 11y-1 am" DOE) RECEiVE MAR 1 - 4 , 0 j Y; , Y4 i P o ' ; A t r ! • I I i " t I i f , 10'41 , , y ! , - ! , , 1t , ! f , I t i'•: b ;I t t, I f t t BI ,, ( i . 1 1 . 1. III y I I v I I i t, I I y 1 I I i.m E tL - f Ir tarok, After f ' i A , " #- y w 1 1 1 11a to phlII 1 t. o Inp t f- y a il d w I f ho - x I I I n r-1 q 1 ')uIld 1 -v A I o the 1 1 1 - , e p aCIC n It z k any I water:, It ill 1 1 a f I I I p I e I rofi 11 1 x111 w( w I I It i 11;; 111 a ri I t fla '.4 • • i 1 C rclll A 1 at d a r q r,? f 1 , o I I t y a r d PA(,V�YQUNV (" ca r f r (" ca q r- nog' our 1�1 6 �, -�, 2 8 ;94 A Pi I i A I WN f C>rtt! :1rm t!,-1 al1 requIatfons for t C rt�ytt3ti: Yt,.>, I.,ti ) No }. If nc; height bulk. ar,d f �r tis'• -r�r tr ; ,tri�t in w , ,iCt7 it i5 locatea? r °tn i ng use N ,t i ti:`. fi tt�r� 11'> py - open "ty pr - ever" _ t 7 tl ( >* t :e inl lift.. ;�onfl`7 f , 4#2 ( ) SUf :' sur Bice ft:.:• ( ) ether': speci • �jc t ion o f anyone t•;. �, „ !.�r� �t tF•r t t- rfirlcd ordln,3nr_e wa- ;sir; r 1' t (',!' 1° •.'.i )t t 1 l v' it Nf such 'J5 thK r ' f .. r,, c, ! "��.� ! j •.. ,�. I _ w � � i C f I 'j �' lif f t ".� k�" '] t �i 'J i3 r' I (9 r'1 {: e r,�, G, 1 .,, _" " ",F r I r ,• i i ri t_ r � wt i t i;�rt? tr!;'r r•� wt. F r: t� re 5 (TI iliariv Ar , f_•frI•r�t `. (< <1r1t:f r1t'Ij 1 t :Jt ,. .' 1 :F•f °_rJ i (.t, c ar! -� t t-uf. ;fir �t i ,ic ,at /., � . rt <. ,_ c ',� �•I r i f9 r �, r` -(.r �i t. �6� .,�.. c �:(" !�p� f -r it)f C: t r'1 t:tlt : 3 f „� f • r - • t} ,i � � fi .I �, i � r. v r,f Mr, �Ctt} f ( „ m �jy i S {.>iCri.it11re D t ( - base `}1 -005 • em y 0 FiX t w( w J r rC Mgt a� ;tie work wi i wore, for me s C.0, ary f D L3 ro t c vor i ante . vu nor „, z , ! 1y. (I (I t<) • r f>e T 9I' d (.,.-a ! o! to enlarge kitchen $ 10fl.00 4 00 v;� a mic ti $1, 100.00 $ 305.00 $ 1917.00 $ 4010.00 3 2( 5 . T C� C O y tile) $ 300.00 rti °ma?.1 (not load bearing} $ 230.00. . door $ 465.00' to 7nd F1 r $ 275,00 ta,e =3ement $ 275.00 r gas w' $ 280 ,00 - Jarpet $ 360. $ 120 0'0 T t $ �� 360.00 r ux c to rya I lway . $ 1 GO" I Q t' $ 1 SO. OQ -ar rtrrpet $ 270_.00 VA! ? next to hallway $ 160.00 ;r r1 r r °; _. r)'rr $ 140.00 ..._. ... -r�.'� dlnrmer- 1nterlor wa1.1 $1,.300,00 >. r. $ 135 00 ! ' '1r; t or ;.nk $ 240 00 r and bathtub $ 460.00 .o v e: ir. (ceramic tike) $ 300.00 $ 1 50.00. dry 'rot t i mtDc- r� 800.00 in order to Footing t sae poured. $ 300.00 ,C to 15e in- , taped 1r of 1 "'poured owe, S ome damdae . $ 200.00 375. - :, �"e rulocLted approx. rx i t i r ,rr r3 $ 170.00 ff r • L �l 0 0 SURVEY FOR: r4>17 NORTM "n �D s or 0 " 140 k I lk 2-- RECEIrvE'D, m�r'* '3' :il GIG90 23B 9 6 - � Prepared By: �SC 4 0 E �— & MA 0 S 0 �Ni N �C-, � -4 ;F Izv DESCRIPT10. Lots U. :Z, 13, 1 .4, 1 5 and 16, Block 9. Round bay Park. according C to the recorded plat thereof. _As I • Front entrance elevation of house No. 5656 Bartlett Boulevard as shown, Elevation - 93E,7 (NGWD-1929). GENERAL NOTES 1. o Denotes iron monument set. x938.5 • Denotes existing spot elevation. L Denotes 933.5 contour. 4. Property area - 15.058 square feet or 0.3457 acres, Qa -, -, -it to Co— Plof • 150 0 L ot -,c,�e o r&JimnoU% BOULEVARD ( aduminou5 Rood) - M 9W 6WASC M W I hereby certify that this survey was prepared under my supervision and that I am a Licensed Land Surveyor u-Jer the ;aws of the State of 041"" sota Date: frel, 4,11Al License No. 17006 ti oN I NG R CQV I RF nENTS BUSH RD ADDRESS: r . 1 � t 4-4 - 4 "ply c APPt ICANT: r2) ffs xr t 6) ` LOT to BLK 47 q7. 11Y7, El N3 t �n� ..._.- --. to ZONE REQUIRED LOT AREA: 1- ��!Sr" '_. !.1� a w 4 s EXISTING LOT AREA: 't ,� .t x , :� •� t: REQ IRED - ETHAC'!i FRONT: 16 uj i fS x � EXISTING !t FARM; }x, F 7 ;,F TRACKS FRONT: SIDE: SLOE: � `' p` REAR: Q� 001-0� LAKESHORE: DATE: r oi4 r ROGER ' M OUND 5 341 Maywood Road Telephone 472 -0621 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 525.6210 LEN HARM i Fax 472 0656 ti.r EMERGENCY 911 Febru 2 ), 7t) {)1 y ,xri T'1ICtE,.r lir, •,4 r TXI �'n lli(}cI E!'.' t. <srIt inc:�c1 within tho following pages is the annual report for thf: police dep artment. The report addresses the budget, per- w )r "snol , tr,iining, equipment, community education, statif;tic:4, ir9:l =`'I "t <'r "Cle (tt;; prep aredness. The y4-or was unique with the building project and the moves th,it wi. :�re made to ac- commodate construction. Police department er,I)IOY(" QS did an excel lent job through a very inconvenient feirire).1. dC tme>nt continued its relationship with the southwest Me,.. ro Drug Task Farce''. Sgt. Hudson became its new ad- mini:r.trator. We continue to present the D.A.R.1 . program in the:- °,th and '1th grades with excellent community support. 1I1ho t uck ;ot exponditures were 3.1` over projections; pritia ily 1)o- c'<iu'-eO of i n. ;uran o c os P Irt l and Part 13 of f en: e:es, <-c(" 'ounted for 1, 08 , ) c_.all;> f( tllr slightly from Total contacts were down by were up by 17. i'liE' (lC.'l ,1T't.I ei t {;4 r'3G.IrIt,lfzL to emphac ;ize dedication to the t:Crm 'Ral i t.y thr()!IcJh the Standards of servicsr� < Intl t1 i r11I;'1 it'y tr1I111incl fc:)r its employees. sincejreLy, I, Ch : �' f l'OL1 1) 1 ' A P IM, r'N • L,il /sh -10r ■ 'T'AM,E OF' c or3'I'F',,4q' , PAGE .[ I Ott" I':�r�•�cle.:C. 1 C5I °I � T BlIdge?t tivtE1 I11�yti.<it1()I1 2 T'T ( C'KT 1rl'1 4,1 t. 1 ona T Chart. 3 T: V 11 r a: c , tin €.? t 4 V. Training 1:3 VI. Eqn ipment 15 VI I - Commull i ty F,du<:._ t .i t)n 16 VIII. statistic s, 1.8 IX. Emorgen y t'r�aF1,3r,..c3rr y 1r> 27 X. [drug Ti k Force 28 G.. -10r ■ p. p_ . ce epar men is looking at w:,tys to better utilize and tra in pi nol to pro vido, getter service. `i'ttc r(7"p. >r iµ provided to highlight the most impor- tant of pc I ice do p,ir•tment activity and to be u3;vfi a -> a cj.`sucj€' fo evZilurlting service. The report includes s(.',me r. omp } ri cson s to past years and provides a tool for planning activities in the years to come. • ! , t : c?t ttic Mound 1 ice Department is to fit, b;04 i:id ijz :+ F-a t:ion and service to the people of M ny (}t the ac.ttivitics of the police depart- c:,Frr r it t :bey l «ind summ..arized in this report for a pol ice department is evaluated is as found in this report. I fl thes statistics comes ' from internal t,,. :",°,r' i- r. +•r ,r <snd also from participation . in the Minn; ;t z Cr nit3il Justice System (CjlS). xn «tt=E° rit r the grime statistics, several ,factors need t: o h("w 1. I'. pul At ion dons 2. I'.;x�;i�;it.y to metropolitan area 1 ; po Pti 1 at i on composition 4. P opulat ion stability 5. Number, sophistication, and development of p >l ice personnel The on ly a r e,_'A ticat the po?, i ce department has control i� fifttr c _it ro 1'h z e l t t d p. p_ . ce epar men is looking at w:,tys to better utilize and tra in pi nol to pro vido, getter service. `i'ttc r(7"p. >r iµ provided to highlight the most impor- tant of pc I ice do p,ir•tment activity and to be u3;vfi a -> a cj.`sucj€' fo evZilurlting service. The report includes s(.',me r. omp } ri cson s to past years and provides a tool for planning activities in the years to come. • i AI)M 1,14 1 S T RATIPN 19`:)0 police budget encountered a few "bumps" and cI,()! out 3.11% over our projections ($22,340). The final, expenditures for the police department c - V,)utItt -d to $ The percentage of expendi,- ture,3 breaks out as follows Personnel $606,292.00 81.9% Insurance 31,964.00 4.3% Capitol Outlay 33,992.00 4.6% Training /Travel (includes P.O.S.T.) 10,700.00 - 1.4% Fuel /Repairs 25,464.00 3.4% All Other 31,778.00 4.4% TOTAL $740,190.00 100% The overtime budget was exceeded slightly due to an officer breaking his arm in an off -duty injury. The major overage in costs came because, of the health' insurance and ,pension calculations. We had projected costs of $92,720 and actually realized costs of $115,249; a difference of $22,529. The police department generated revenues of $73,957 from court fines and violations. Animal licenses and pick -ups accounted for $8,175 of revenue. Acc'- dc,rat reports generated $781. Minnesota Police Pension and P.O.S.T. Board reim- bursements totaled $52,750 and $5,520 respectively. The Southwest Metro Drug Task Force reimbursed the department $57,809 for officers assigned to the task force. • 103 2 ■ • • joe m ill < D.A.R,E. Of fic or .fi P :It rol 6.4 D'ruq Ta v;k Force 1.0 11.0' So r`q t.':snt 1 . t.lr f !.i'.' ,r 1.0 °i°cJAI SwOrn Pe it ::i knne =1 1'3.0 Non ;wr,T'n FlersOnnel; l'O i i Ce Secretary ' • 0 Plirt -Timm Personnel: Code Enforcement Off. 1.0 (.75 FTE)* Total Police Personnel 15.0 (14.75 *FTE = Full Time - Equivalent • joe m ill < S 70(,:5; Mt Ft',41.) POET CE 1) ESA PTME NT 1 fa fE cq Chii-i of Police - Orl "Irl Harrell Will i am Hud:;on (Assigned to Drug , Z "isk Force) BT - ad Ray Steve ve gran t„{ John McKinley f'at,rol .Officer Ronald Bostrom John Ewald `Dodd 'Truax Ga ry Lot ton Todd Limon(l (Assign( cl. to Drug Trask Force) Darrell Ifuggett b Canine • Daniel Niccum Robert M euwi s« pr), Shi rley Hawks Cc l F;ri,f.pr c.e.ment Q f ,i tai r June Hyland F'cal_ic'e _Re =_sc.,rye Dave Nelson M{srk ` atilstrom Richard Hawks John Romain Ruth Vogel Richard Jaazc:swski Sherry zuccaro I a- 1ir-,n S,he Jeff Fleming Kevin Larson James Fox :;tE '/r; K C' >11"Y Kathleen Fox k a! fi l'�nt3tEs Tom Gesye: ra S 70(,:5; - ?6 - 7 6 L, l_xEat Tn. ont: l'i °,Ca.,it,t€'• r'tt` tl it <tliarlinq two of t col h. T a.s�: sil«r�a� Nl0. �t:�rt I'�ruq r,z "car° ( i I)o t11e ta!�k f'esrc a t��r �a rl zr vy n(' Of ice r Lirnonid who h,id bi, ,.�> i In l"a81) Inve ;,-rtirpitorIs G ti °Finlr= ° or ca:.e fol lo`#r -up w,itl1 Cir:xn.�.l PixS`llr ib'i i ity. Off i.cer '1'ru,ax p1,t`C` €" -,j ?. -R. F. l:3rfjgr'a at sila2 "ley Ell l is, CT "ca,`icitlat''w' g ry j 11r l,:a�ly c)f° the Take Schools 411 w 111Vt3 L C r,.. to receive great community support for the The program was presented to 4approxaar;ate},ly Fiikr del),artmo t has contlnt with regtllEar esysaIL13- tion:; of they police employ€ o.�,. In general, the of- ficc have: keen doing a fine job in serving the cOmmunTty. Th(>rey w as some dl.;(.ip1inary action with individual, officers and their conduct is being IIlonitored'. There were two internal, invest.igationi, initiated with disciplinary ;act ion t.4ak¢'n in one of the cases; Psychological re- evaluation we=re gi t e to two of- f icers in 199o. The process continue the psychological testing for each officer every five years. The Mound Police continued and expanded its relationship with the Southwest Metro rrr°ug ra�3k Force. Sgt. Hudson became the track forge ad- ministrator in February, and joined Officer Lim<3nd on the unit. slob Meuwi.ssen was hired through grunt reimbursements to replace Hudson's positi i n patrol. The task force received federal and sate monies along with local matching funds from. the k.orc -Y munities involved. The communities involv,'cd area Chanhassen, Carver County, South brake Minr)Qtonk.a, St. Boni /Minnetrista, Scott County, Shakopr,e, Chaska, and Prir;lr Lake. See section X for the (,an- nual report of the Southwest Metro Drug Task l c:arre >. Officer Huggett attended training with "Rambo'€ through the Minneapolis Police Department. "R arr:boll was certified in June to work the street. In r(: =p- tember, "Rambo" earned a P.D. #1 certification through the United States Police Canine A s'n. - ?6 - 7 6 • 7 70� ?'otl,'A Police Reservos continue to do an excel- [ i -f ' j0b for the community and the police depart - ,.r rat < Roy has bet in as signed the permanent for the reserveq, Unit strength averaged tt "n volunteers for 1990. The Mound Police c'ambined to donate a total of 2,580 hours. s a ;r ote c.t- Intl Ca ;(as accounted for 62 investi - t .1 in 1990. criminal sexual conduct cases were �)(J i:rI ul') slightly for the second year. Total con-- t ~t: ware down 7 % a decrease in hazardous traff violations being the bulk of the reduction in con- ta( s . Of f i('(�rs and staff used a total of 470 days of f)eno f i t time dur - ing 1990. The time off included ap,- r)' ly 205 vacation da 116 holidays, cis comp d , 94 sick day.,,, and 3 funeral days. Of ficers earned 546 hours of comp -time and 1,000 hours of O m irrc - : during the year. • 7 70� The Mound Police Reserves received training in first -aid and CPR, defensive tactics, and new of- ficers attended the Hennepin County Reserve Officers Course. Finances: The reserves continue to raise their own funds and are predominantly self - sufficient. 8 OL� MOUND POLICE RESERVES ANNUAL REPORT The Mound Police Reserves donated 2,580 hours in 1990. The unit has averaged 10 individuals for the past year and those people have been very active in serving the community. The police reserves assisted in providing the fol- 1owing security services and /or police back -up at: Emergency call outs Reserve squad - house calls High school dances Hockey and football games Pinewood De r!.)y Mound City Days Danc:c wr Heart Raspberry Festival Spring Park Crazy Days officer Friendly assists Earth Day Ceremonies Westonka Homecoming parade M.D.A. Telethon Wayzata fireworks Westonka senior overnight party Incredible Festival Child finger printing Halloween and "Kiddie" parades Long Lake Corn Days Heart Assoc. Garage Sale Homecoming Parade Christmas Tree Lighting Our Lady of the Lake Marathon West` Hennepin Polo Memorial Day Parade Mound Westonka High School Graduation The Mound Police Reserves received training in first -aid and CPR, defensive tactics, and new of- ficers attended the Hennepin County Reserve Officers Course. Finances: The reserves continue to raise their own funds and are predominantly self - sufficient. 8 OL� iMrR Rf5. G MM N/F TRAIw IItS14 RiAf MffS C10 50UA1 5FRv BALL IMG 71ON ALOMG ADM IM IwG IOfA, BA "f i Sv.S 29.0 96.0 20.0 7.0 - 144.5 261.5 17,0 605 5 4 45.5 9.5 101,5 29.0 35:5 2,0 14L.5 10.0 1 <.5 32,C 5 44,5 69,0 64.5 27,5 49,0 4.0 4 ; 4.0 i5.0' '3.5 586.0 0 t1 35.5 6,0 40.5 4.3 80. 12 5.5 3,0 3.0 3.5 1 62,5 -2.0 96.5 13 29.5 ].0 32.0 7.5 78.5 8.0 4.5 2,5 164 5 t4 t.0 54,0 21,5 9,0 2.5 6.5 83.5 fib.. 16 7.5 25.5 4.0 5..0 26.5 4.5 73.0 t7 D 23 6.0 _ 3.5 9.5 ` 28 26.5 24.0 53.0 1,0 47.5 6.0 8.5 172,5 56 48.0 15.5 50.5 18,0 48.0 4,0 19.0 52.5 11.0 2910 59 27.0 5.5 47,0 3.0 80.5 14.0 2.0 17 58 17.5 5.5 t0.0 2.0 35.2 T01A1 273.5 157.5 590.0 164.5 378.0 45.5 535.5 345.5 go.0 2,580.0 PESfRVf _ACT_IYI_TIfS 1v91 Car Maintenance Christmas Tree Lighting Court CPR Instruction Dances Earth Day football Comes runerel Gana: & Marcotics Class Maitoween Para:•te Transports wcckey Games Neart A>soc. Gars9e Sale Plymouth Henn. County Auxittary School Homecoming incredible fest Long Lake torn Days Parade Meetings Memorial Day Parade Mound City Days Mound r:raudstion Party MCA Telethon OLC Marathon Polo Match - best Hennepin Plymouth Graduation PR24 Training Reserve Booth Construction reserve Squad Ride Atongs ROTA Train ^,g - Conine 1(i �� 1 DISTRIBUTION ©F -2580 HOURS BY 'ACTIVITY R es Cr+� / quad c�3f0 A 40 i N P. J. Aa DISTRIBUTION OF 2580 HOURS BY RESERVE • V . TRAINING The police department attennpts to provid� ' � tr4ljnin�l on a continual basis to matintair its ef f Oct and efficiency. Modern law enforcement is jr, changing environment that requires the dove lup, of special skills and necessitates officc�r abreast of recent changes in job relevant and procedures. High standards of' excelli_+rlce are accomplished by the Police dePartmelit. When oxtcnsive training can be offered to both offizors ar)d stift. Police personnel attended 207 days of training in 1990. Courses Attondod • 0 Edged Weapons Firearms Training National Crime Prevention Institute Canine Training Achieving Excellence in I.tw Fri f Homicide Investigation Gambling Emergency Medical Technician & First Side-handle Baton Field Sobriety Testing Intoxilyzer Course & Refre Pursuit Driving Spring Chief's Conference Officer Survival Course Defensive Tactics - pi Performance Evaluation Hazardous Materials Crime Prevention Criminal Justice Information - Hot Files - TAC Certification Vehicle Restraints D.A.R.E. Seminar Narcotics Supervision I.A.C.P. Conference Building Integrity/A Corruption Undercover Narcotics Property Management Drug Recognition for Patrol Interview & Interrogation Dynamic Building Fntry Emergency Preparedness 13 -? /V • making t r n t f i I"tw Eli for-c-0ment flii- Tv,t i ii i nq - Nat tonal & Regional • • pur c'hitsecl in 1r: 90. The vehicles t t ". cE: <ll7 the county bid process and 1 l o. ; with V6 engines. The pur- i tent with the �) year rotation wi'r,e purchased for each squad. 1 10 radios ware purchased and each their own radio. A bullet w p urcha sed partially w funds from An additional weapon { .�r ,eI to furnish Officer Meuwis- C i ry rad ic:; base station purchased t h- a f: f i ce gas weld as a work station for A ; :, I n . and they Pol R eserves equ i p.men". to the pol ice exercise • —7/w c'"MM�'NITY F.-POCATION,/� __j pf I ice department became involved with the com- Y i n a variety of activities in 1990. Fol I ow- i�; a brief description of tha activities. t , r 1 W3 ice reserves have conducted several different Cey IVSO.' in conjunction with , 'immunity services. ( ' 1 include CPR certification and re- --it if ication. A moderate fee is charged by com- t services to cover the costs of materials and f,lc i I i ty. 11m v;(' Cheqks The Folic.0' reserves provide a service of checking F on out-of-town resident's homes when notific�ition has been provided to the police depart- ment. The Police department continues to work closely with the intervention program to assist families that are victims of domestic abuse. Pep. rtmont Tours The police department has conducted a number of tours of our facility for Cub Scouts and Brownie Scouts. Demons t r - - - _ - _5 t i o n s The Police department has been involved in a number of public presentations ranging from canine demonstrations to talks about safety with day-care s t u d e n t . . The Police department has talked to groups concerning drugs, gun safety, vehicle safety, DWI, and personal safety. finge-rorintij) _g The department provides a service of fingerprinting individuals as may be requested. This includes both children and adults. Mound City Day The department was very involved in this year's celebration. Security was provided for the parade, the "Around Mound Run", and the fireworks. • N E _?/ ? 16 N • • I-) • A. R . y. _ P r,2_qr4m Drug Awareness Resistance Education has been imple- inented at both Shirley Hills Elementary, Grandview Middle School, and Our Lady of the Lake Schools* W#, Community Action Network the dop-irtment has been actively involved in assist- inq the task force in defining area problems and dc-veloping a network for assisting needy in- dividuals, fiomeco nq i Pirade - I T-1 The department assisted the high school with setting Lip a parade route and ther, provided security for the Hallowpon Parade Provide security for children during the parade. .A.r.lo,ur.illd-,M-OLi.n.d...-Run This last year there was a 5 mile run and two walk- ing courses that we provided security for. Officer Fririndlv Elementary school presentations for child safety. YMCA Detached Worker Proqram The de,.)artment has established a working relation- ship with the detached worker program. The program assisted in providing activities for "at risk" children in Mound. I I 71k !A !'I: I I (_'<; !f• "t I c-, n of the report a na I yzc t. he? �tj i � I of the annual report. Most of the inform,i- fro; tcAbUIZIting the inform ' ition from in;,- Popol is ICRIS) informational reports, I t 1(" Citations. t 3t it TILIntor of ICR's in a year is useful for tr inq the level of activity of the der ' 'irtment aV e �' to prvious years. It also allows for com- i)Ar i„c' I )n between personnel changes and activity 1-1. Some reporting changes were made in 1986 to statistical duplication that was found in S"stom. `1 TNCIDFwrS PER YEAR 1984 _THFoUGH 1990 YEAR TOTA 1, 1 F NCID NTS/MONTH 1984 15,209* 1,251 198,L ) 15,233* 1,269 1 It" 6 14,078 1,173 1987 13,445 1,120 1988 15,582 1,298 1989 14,559 1,213 19()0 13,680 1,140 5 Yr. Avg. 14,579 1,214) *Reflects old gathering system 19()() reflected a decreas(:-, in total Contacts of 6%. The serious incidents of crime reported to the police department are categorized into Part I and Part 11 Offenses. Part I Offenses: Part I Offenses include major crimes such as homicide, criminal sexual conduct, rob- bery, assault, burglary, larceny, vehicle theft, and arson. Although Part I Of- fenses are a small percentage of reported crimes, it is these crimes that demand " Most attention from the police depart :nt in terms of irivestigation and commitment of resources. • • 11 I I () f , f e r I f < ., .; : h a r t I1 0 t f e r� , o n c I u d t t., I - i m e s of f 0 1 (if ry, chi ld atzclr;r3jrlegl.e� t, a sm vjj1)( I i �, , Stolen ptopt se xual ITI i .'conduct wo, t p 0 11 s v i 0 la t i on's; Sexual misconduct n 'ircotics v i o 1,1 liquor violations" DWI, simple domestic Ass'ault, em- J)rostitution, puhlic run.i and other violations. cl ,, tranc , e rat o for comhin(!d Part I and Part TI was P�trt I and Part 11 offenses Fart bin(,J were within 1 % Of the 1�jS9 combinod rate. Part I and 13,,!t arf thj"t inCidents that necossit'itc- t' Most, timt. '11 Id l lort fron, the pc)lic(, departmcrnt. initial call timo i' gr( in gather- ing pertint,�nt inforr, a t the scel)e and the greatest amount of inve, and follow-up i dedicated to types of crimes. TratfIC offenst, Traffic off in,rlude_ moving and non-moving violations. An examination of the number and percentage of traffic stOPs, as part of the total number of in- cid allows one to determine the decd; ee to which -ehicular traffic and pedestrian movement affects the department's work load. It should also be noted that the more visible that patrols are maintained, the more likely is the Positive impact in deterring serious c In 1990, traffic citations accounted for 1 Police contacts, down 24% from 1989. Property damage accidents were down 27% and personal injury accidents were do»n 27.5% from 1989. There were 97 DWI arrests (up 56%) and of those, 40% were repeat offender- for gross misdemeanor violations. The average test was .147; down from 1989. The highest reading was a .25; the legal limit is .10. • N 7.20 c y PT' losses were valued at $153,34 *. i n 0 The d v p it r t m e n t r t, c o v (� r e j e 1) a r t m e n t i n v e s t i 9 a t e d h i 1 d cases for the year. These continue to be the single most time- C< we handle. Dispute Casos: The depArtment responded t. 73 dome-;tic +, I. 33 with assaolts. The number 01 d om ( - ; tic a ss a u 1 t s r e m a i n e d f I i r'l Y constant, but the nu,"Iber of total & 3 tic-s is down. The Police dE- partront processed and booked 271 adults in 1990. There were 42 adults arrested for felonies, 289 adults for mis- demc-anors, 49 juveniles arrested for felonies, and 112 juveniles arrested fer misdemeanors. In Addition, 141 formal complaints were issued for a variety of crimes. Animal Complaint.->: The department responded to 887 animal complaints during 1990. E • 14 1 MCAlND PQ lCt DEPARTMENT POt.lCf /CR ME ACTlVf1Y REPCIRT • 21 1� 1587 1988 1.9f?9 1lry 1 1,542 1,225 1,56t 1,172 1,333 1,429 1, ow 932 949 668 519 617 356 340 ti 440 461 68S 417 346 137 74 4 �,,,• 1,187 1,216 1,311 &IS 643 351 333 1,521 1,368 1,503 754 1,075 738 497 639 604 381 101 106 ;27 104 91 62 97 58 75 95 75 44 35 71 1 • " ' . v .. ,, ., A.; S... t U4 Its 96 99 121 102 74 37 47 a'ti 36 36 29 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 "A tt „t Ff,O;o y Arrests 38 37 52 44 36 51 443 * AA,St Mi „rfnrr Arr t4 433 450 447 281 359 335 147 `J Fe, n'�y Arlt -%!s 1.4 57 50 59 79 35 50 *fro. ,i1 M. ,<1•:t�rarK;r Arrests 68 110 175 120 108 68 119 Viet t f Cttr•trsc5 RgA;fted 234 360 381 372 417 353 322 Cte•arrd 47 48 113 86 BO 109 112 Arrest Made 59 81 67 74 70 75 91 Fart 11 Offetes Repo( ttd 430 676 904 789 857 725 767 Cteared 285 234 617 457 209 227 493 Arrests Made 221 160 359 311 319 242 401 medit•ats 290 276 168 218 274 315 371 Animat C(rrl>laintS 1,223 1,318 1,205 1,128 1,091 1,097 887 O.her Ccnerat inve;tigatiprs 6,786 6,621 5,043 5,442 6,729 6,780 6,280 TOTAL 15,009 15,174 13,890 13,234 15,407 14,232 13,2% Assists 777 521 691 672 549 F.^itr)+ .)Tr, 527 520 6010 297 192 Mul -iI Atd 188 211 175 210 160 'Ats;; i -, warrant ar;t -sts thrckygh 1988 • 21 1� MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY YEARLY REPORT, 1990 THIS YEAR GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY TO DATE }f,ezircl4�uus Citations 1,082 t orv-lfsi<,ar3ou 3 Citations 340 fi;i <�tdcy�a:> Warnings 74 t1c t — iik r it lci�.as Warnings 333 Warnings 1,503 Fir kin(, Citations 391 D14 97 Over .10 71 F'rc)perty Damage Accidents 74 Personal Injury Accidents 21 Fatal Accidents 0 Adu Felony Arrests 61 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 443 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 147 :juvenile Felony Arrests 50 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 119 .juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 87 Part I Offenses 322 Part II Offenses 767 Medicals 371 Animal Complaints 887 Other Public Contacts 6,280 TOTAL 13,520 Assists 549 Follow -Ups 192 Henn. County Child Protection 62 Mutual Aid Given 160 Mutal Aid Requested 72 • LAS`P YEAR TO DATE 1,429 356 137 351 1,368 604 62 35 102 29 0 51 335 87 35 68 53 353 725 315 1,097 6,780 14,349 672 297 60 210 103 C] W3 2 2 LA YEARLY REPORT 1490 OFFENSES CLEARED EXCEPT. CLEARED BY ARREfiTFD REPORTED UNFXIOED CLEARED ARREST Amt .l1mvitt FART ! Cui»S ' 4(w, i Cie 0 0 0 0 0 0' cr4R i Se+u l CrxRka:t 22 7 a 4 3 T 2 #trey 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ; Agg'.ivatod A, oN. t 6 0 0 S 3 1 &, scary 50 1 3 7 j La{ ,arty 214 5 20 43 26 3d, Veh9C,ie Theft 24 i 3 S S 1 A,!,on 6 0 0 0 0 9 TvtAL 32Z 4 34 64 42 49 PART 11_C 104CS u Child Abuse /Neglect 52 16 26 3 j 0 Forgery /NSF Checks 4 2 10 0 j '` 0 Criminal Damage to Property 115 2 17 10 6 Weapons 13 1 3 8 6 Narcotics 34 t 0 33 33 6 LIgior Laws 77 2 0 OS owl 47 1 0 j Simple Assault 61 0 36 14- 16 Domestic AssaL,t 33 0 18 12 11 0 Domestic (149 Assault) 40 0 0 0 0` 1 Harassment 103 0 13 d S 0 Rwwy /incorrigibility /Truancy 54 0 10 39 0 61 Pub is Peace 19 0 7 10 9 3 lrespess. ": - S 0 0 2 4 3 All rather offenses 61 2 3 TOTO 767 27 F 143 323 289 112 PART 1(I i PART IV Property Dwfte Accidents 74 Ptrsona( Injury Accidents 21 Fatal Accidents 0 Medicats 371 Animal Complaints 887 Mutual Aid 160 Other General investigations 6,280 TOTAL 7,793 Hennepin County Chid Protection 62 CHIPS 12 TOTAL 8,956 41 177 387 331 161 23 7w)(/ PP.OPERTY LOSS /RECOVER:' SUMMARY YEARLY REPuRT, 1990 f STOLEN RECOVERED bikE:E $ 4,279 895 Sno:rmob i l e a 4,009 0 "1c`..hiny 5,659 75 Currency, Notes, Etc. 9,068 4, 169 Jewelry & Ptec�ious Metjlr 7,027 557 Guns 527 287 Horne Furnishin95 2,067 0 Radio & Electronic Equipment 20, 467 2, L,36 Vehicles & Vehicle Eq"ipment 31,766 26,680 Miscellaneous 4", 2�7 ., .,743 TOTAL $130,137 $36,60? - 74 24 6 D • %M 0 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT YEARLY REPORT, 1990 CTTATIONO UL f9w 94 3 M�)r'c. ti-in .10% BAC 71 0 i'z,r 1 s:;a /r ?et,klc�as Driving 9 0 I)rivinrl Aft*':r Susp. or R:lv. 76 0 01.(n bottle 13 1 i 11(4 715 50 No D1, or Exp ired DL 28 7 Pe tr can DL 11 0 :improper, Expired, or No Plates 185 2 Illega.!. Passing 3 1 Stop Sign Violations 59 5 failure to Yield 8 2 Equipment Violations 11 1 H&R Leaving the Scene 3 0 No Insurance 12 0 Illegal or Unsafe Turn 2 0 over the Centerline q 2 Parking Violations 391 0 Crosswalk 24 1 Dog Ordinances 6 0 Derelict Antos 1 0 Seat Belt 123 3 MV /ATV 6 1 Miscellaneous Tags 4u 6 TOTAL 1,896 85 25 7.) ARRF Warrants: 181 E - M � 26 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT YEARLY REPORT, 1990 WAS NI ADULT Juv 151 14 58 5 148 29 3 0 An i M,i 20 0 Tr', i ,; h De: t� a i ct It i t o 57 0 Seat Belt 1 0 Tros Alas ,into 0 11 Misce,l 30 0 TOTAL 468 59 ARRF Warrants: 181 E - M � 26 IV. MKqk'.RQ,_! L I _LClyl, ()Ey Nqk.1 The Emergency Preparedness budget again ciimo in un- der original projections. The t ilk of the savings was realized through a maintenance agrco,-,ent that fell through for the sirens. Repairs were done, on an as needed basis, but no maintenance was done. we hope to have a good aqreemE signed for 1991. Hazardous materials continues to be a major concern for Emergency Prep'ireJness. The manual was again updated to mJet state and federal guidelines. The City receives approximately $4,000 from FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Ass'n.) in the form of a grant. I have continued training in order to receive certification through the state as an em<2r- gency manager. • :7 27 WWW' Ldr_MTRIA E 9 • 28 j I t t h e (i I - I. , ( 3 task force ;« +• We currently have Sgt. i mi received re i m- t ilrough i? federal grant ove the task riq a n ex' - e I I t' lit, )()b ' d f " le I've S our j , o r t , E 9 • 28 t • . ri t '. Fw i i.: C1r a Fir'• F I. • - .J II �!_- .. - - rr f_S. fc'r T4�A •,.:i1_.. if ✓E_.tlry :tr:r «E2t�' :'♦ 1 E:, 15tinq r,nd F 1 _ :a ., f,�r t 1 1in(I prr.;r_r� t: t :_ 0ry .r:lr.�.t;i� t'. hE fiir. r _ c k ctirq } .t,r:rt >r:. -* r•r:_ t, r :r .fish ± 1-1. .f. f f,r r _ r t t r' ; 1 r'r i r'. r '.i l: k'i -�� , 7 tEY '�1[• i- - F >E: !1 +(,i� E0 I F r: Th A w rE- - tmpr '�.r� -d �.fpon, All �lc�es r wr by thF Tr: is F,_,(CC E?rE? woId arld ct IE:'as_ F r:. ar,7n 1m1)1er,ented. Th grFea reduced the ;:,T„ -,vnt beirtg sFtent o rt vE?h1ciE? rep11rs, 1 nadd t';' F rr,virlin(I AAW 1 J C f t 4, e t ra 1 f 7 T 11 PWA :41 ..-,f-, t a 1 t a t 'd f . -irk C r or MS to 1 WAY, t f . I Y T Ar:d to t A e " +Je r raa i3lIdi7e ;'t Ci i r t h rE'r1 "f T r t U':" Alc'nq '41 t Ion OITJ I Plo'ns of wool 7, f the c u r r c y is pfe , ven(ly Q? i n F. ", - ?h r e y c - ! t to t)E SI-- t e presently at the autc Surtow! awai t ,.t the t,'fTf- Of thj�. r( Tl, twq, tnotorcynk- nI. Id ni the spring. 1110 jewelry oil 1 al F >? ,:d ail as P , "Ible. The fundn from thw•o Y"Joy wi ll A p,, t L, '. k P p 1 1 e d t, t I ')I tu (,, I- i f I t , trose 710WIS will W JUA Int- tfh,.,t fi.irt of the 1911 budget where ul tv, ,, b CAf VIN nalary rei riL. • -73t 0 73..2 t , e .m r " i.l 5; �, c. ... r . �) l � f' �- (, � _ _, :y r I r, h b• � t; v i �.' 4 f _ ? r tc' .� � _. c4 w't:'r ri. C f.. X3 L� 11?`;:i r J r.'. 'iIt _. I .it tll <i`r1t:;� __f�Cf +1GtE:rCf 1[r r '��1Ci{ �afiFE', i�r.l3 C". t 1 t Y ._ , i ,. . r C 1i�. �_J � 1 k3 Z' �.•C. r. .:.I x1. �� r• t rt (., c'� ., .i -•i P .. c 4 lC-V0 1-1_ C zn Mj ejp �f , -r• t`�f: y,. C �n CaIifc.r, - r , , . 1e,L -i �ec r Liar, _ . , z 7 ; .cf z rr, t� z r��= _s.�ira,;t u �,.� t _h. :t:'.,: :.f 0r tt u _� .• , ;�:: r;_,rr.' `.ic, .tii r,,�, a'.,ril<�t,ifa ire '�hr.• r„ ?: r .cr. .rf:_�,. t n t h t? ��' ft �f c.�r G •F �'f.r.. c' f tirr This fr = r...z1 ci C +,Ar1 !Iaf Li f r" _ >rr,E? 41';f' 1F1 r':[iil C:' ;rit1'.y 1.1171 r _�`, �,Ec �F?, _, itrl';, drra'_t _. f,•;rf 4 ,L- 7 -iEl . t'= ''art, C. A male and ff- :n. :,Ie in Ch .i tf Aftr?r a Iengthy inve�atiyatic:�n. rf= sr.rlt cif thi 1nv es, tlgdti it 'a,a'q 1L.'firr;od t -i this' male and ftr,a1e were c]cring tc htlnne_ap: l is ar,d 73..2 .1 ._ r n d t • 133 t .;T a R I,'u�' i r +- n r° ? ; �.� _s Ir4k,'OLrJI I I .�r: �L rG M,�: 1 JUVEn LE CITY OF YOUNG AMFRICA /CARVER COUNTY 1 , 21') CAL E OF MAR I JUANA .. : 2 SALE OF MARIJUANA SALE OF MARIJUANA 4. .2 S SAL Fa OF MARIJUANA 5, ;�:►: FOSS OF MARI JUANA O CASE.a INVOLVING A AI;t1L S CITY OF PENTON TOWNSHIP /CARVER COUNTY 1. 24.1 SALE OF MARIJUANA 1 CASE INVOLVING i ADULT CONFIDENTIAL �3 y/ C ,G I . I t ♦ L L a S' A I (1 I 11 ', P -4.'C- POSS OF P'AR I JUANA W/ INTENT IM,"ILYING I ACULT C! T OF EAST I . 0 - L PO OF PlA I rA 1 C")E INVOI VIING CITY GiF - COUNTY 1. FALE !, PLJRrW6E OF MARIJUANA CIV7 ! � INVOLVING --' ,,rJjl.TS n I • 73 5 CONFIDENTIAL,, t "t. NA 1A A t, of t F C F if i s. 0 F L L a S' A I (1 I 11 ', P -4.'C- POSS OF P'AR I JUANA W/ INTENT IM,"ILYING I ACULT C! T OF EAST I . 0 - L PO OF PlA I rA 1 C")E INVOI VIING CITY GiF - COUNTY 1. FALE !, PLJRrW6E OF MARIJUANA CIV7 ! � INVOLVING --' ,,rJjl.TS n I • 73 5 CONFIDENTIAL,, 7 CON '` I OEN - r[AL Sw zjT c i r Y oi cotjrjT I : :'al SALE CF *-w To Miry - )p tAj '9S ) -ALE r I JUAtdA C OF V'o'� I 2 (A,ES INVOt %"INIC' - ADULTS) ci ry OF x:'31 3. 1 4. 243 4 CASES 0P0NO I.APF/SPRP FAF SALE OF F-'-'OZE TO M11'1OR SALE OF TO MINOP SAG.L CF Pt'107E TO MINOR SALE OF I:G E INVOLV'NG .1 AULILTS --------------------- 73(o G SALE L ` "A A.' F- 1 ISA I F C 0 '! E r � C! 7 E T 10 CASE INVOLVING 15 AELILT3 Sw zjT c i r Y oi cotjrjT I : :'al SALE CF *-w To Miry - )p tAj '9S ) -ALE r I JUAtdA C OF V'o'� I 2 (A,ES INVOt %"INIC' - ADULTS) ci ry OF x:'31 3. 1 4. 243 4 CASES 0P0NO I.APF/SPRP FAF SALE OF F-'-'OZE TO M11'1OR SALE OF TO MINOP SAG.L CF Pt'107E TO MINOR SALE OF I:G E INVOLV'NG .1 AULILTS --------------------- 73(o 11 -73-7 CONFIOENTIAL , t , '7rit IlF I "!ARI.71,'ti,.' 1. ?I Puss [M[: 17. i T tt^ 11 -73-7 CONFIOENTIAL A "$ (. h L'.: C� 7 • y .. .:'i.i ..r1:. r ' r..:lF r�r ,� I ,II ?t�•i .ta A :� ��,' I- Iii ~• t' t �r ",' , } C. iD C;II'r' psi` '," T & �r7Ii i I:1� i 3' t' a U{•.(,.HA:3I., OF :.,_ fi .l tl�• r�r� .`'A FURCHA5T (1F M % +.t? In 1' ' :t!a the Task F. c pr c> -. r 1 r4 +�r� IA'. adl+It ai a LIVet) As ,t,_wn 3,11 t J t P people were Inv, ) vF -, .n m rc= th,:in r. Q sometimeti in more than , n , ncy city. r..C")I", t�' Inr-- rI n r CITY COUNCIL PACKET - 3 -26 -91 #2 STATE OF THE LIQUOR STORE, 1990 by JOEL KRUNM Bd- siness at the Mound Municipal Liquor Store in 1990 was in juxtaposition. Almost a diclrtotmy if you would. The first half of the year was characterized by "optimism ". Sales were brisk, our customer count was increasing and the average purchase per customer was well ahead of the industry's projected inflationatory figures. In general, the mood was progressive and upbeat. This euphoric feeling was not present the second half of the year. "Apprehension" more than sums up the attitude of our customers and those involved in the liquor business during the latter part of 1990. Factors contributing to this pessimism were the Persian Gulf confrontation, the recession and most of all the announcement by congress that the F.E.T. (Federal Excise Tax) after December 31st, would escalate on all liquor, wine and beer products to an unprecedented all time high. It is these two opposite halves that I will address in, my "State of the Liquor Store" report, for 1990, beginning with the optimistic side. On the bright side, 1990 was finaicially, both in sales and profits, a huge success. We had ou► best year ever in terms of sales, posting slightly over one million dollars in gross sales and $939,285 in net sales. This compares to the net sales in 1989 of $891,942. This is a 5.3% increase which may not seem like much to the average layman who may claim that we were merely staying pace with inflation. True, but what the uninformed observer would not know is that the liquor industry is a depressed industry Lnd has been since 1980. Sales of distilled spirits have steadily declined since then, beer sales have been flat for the last several years, and wine sales for the first time in recent memory are off. So, the strides made here last year were far from ordinary. As profits are concerned '90 was also a banner year. We managed to again maintain a respectable gross profit margin of 23.21x. Year in and year out we are always around the 23% level. This can be verified through the ensuing Statement of .4evenues, 0 Expenses and Operating Income. Provided in that information you 13 1 = or) a positive note and ending with �^ - • - rWt e our operating expenses went up minimally would be running 4 9 ir: 1989 to $162,'( in 1990. This difference the 1.9 rncrease in operating expenses. You may re_ t. ' - hlit ti.e 1990 approved operating expense:: were as much as c,r xt:h straight year that I have managed the $2 r:t under budget. A good gross profit .:I:c, gib' e fiscal spending 1 imit combined to make t ., t "or 1 _?90 a heal thy $64 , 035 See the attached re,rs 188, 189 and 1 90. How ;:r :,li: customers react to such blatant price hikes? Would there: t< enough press coverage on this so that consurr:ers would kn,') th,it it eras not the wholesalers and retailers who were re- -;:ible'? -i What percentage of the population would p2nic and stork up before January 1st? How many people would curtail their drinking patterns? Would hose accustomed to drinking the more exYF�n��ive products s�.`ch to less costly items? Would people cross over categories, i.e., go from drinking liquor to wine? These and other questions loomed over us as we approached the end of 1990. An uncertainty and uneasiness pervaded the whole industry. Hopefully though, our ideas and feelings were leaning towards the worst possible scenario. Maybe, just maybe, people would accept the whole concept of a higher "sin tax" on alcohol. I mean has the high cost of cigarettes deterred everyone from smoking? Perhaps all of our anxieties were for naught. Could this be a blessing in disguise? A sheep in wolf's clothing? A silver lining in every dark cloud? I hope so. If this is the case, then 1991 and the following years will be the best ever because obviously, the more an item costs, the m re profit is in that product. All these potential changes (or non changes) are dependent upon whether people's attitudes are altered because of the higher Federal Excise Tax. Needless to say, time will tell and 1991 should be a very interesting year. JK :1s 2119/91 • 2 7(/ or) a positive note and ending with a bang e,Motions and anticipations would be running high. .` ,. Fi cini rig aver our heads was the ubiquitous F.E.T re_ t. _r:ag1 a bo ttle of liquor going up as much as $1, $2 an t•ot.t.ie! Wine rising as high as $2 for a 3 liter jug. How ;:r :,li: customers react to such blatant price hikes? Would there: t< enough press coverage on this so that consurr:ers would kn,') th,it it eras not the wholesalers and retailers who were re- -;:ible'? -i What percentage of the population would p2nic and stork up before January 1st? How many people would curtail their drinking patterns? Would hose accustomed to drinking the more exYF�n��ive products s�.`ch to less costly items? Would people cross over categories, i.e., go from drinking liquor to wine? These and other questions loomed over us as we approached the end of 1990. An uncertainty and uneasiness pervaded the whole industry. Hopefully though, our ideas and feelings were leaning towards the worst possible scenario. Maybe, just maybe, people would accept the whole concept of a higher "sin tax" on alcohol. I mean has the high cost of cigarettes deterred everyone from smoking? Perhaps all of our anxieties were for naught. Could this be a blessing in disguise? A sheep in wolf's clothing? A silver lining in every dark cloud? I hope so. If this is the case, then 1991 and the following years will be the best ever because obviously, the more an item costs, the m re profit is in that product. All these potential changes (or non changes) are dependent upon whether people's attitudes are altered because of the higher Federal Excise Tax. Needless to say, time will tell and 1991 should be a very interesting year. JK :1s 2119/91 • 2 7(/ 0 N J I i N D i A ND - FERATINC INCOME -j D E C EM B E R DECEMBER Be w r i"� T T E 'A F F, - i r ri i J 1 42 4 05.5 2895x6 1 a. % !22 50. 442094 2.62w 25310 2 !00. 76.6x% 6 7 _5 5 j 4 23.37w 199994 17,9!% 4 S 5 . A 6% 4 6 4 /--. -2. (:)7% 50. 49% 71 -C).44% !00. 0 0: 77.16% 1 7.s8% 0 0 � �� 3 5. 40 % 292156 126504 1a, 47% 12!149 4 «267» ¢«.§52 452399 2« §25 2.5 4* , 4 % - 351 4 «9 :aG.e§= 022028 7 76. 633550 215 17 23.21% 2084 !62 7 67 l7 1597 ss25G 5.33% 4 7 - 2 6, ., 56 ! 40 42 4 05.5 2895x6 1 a. % !22 50. 442094 2.62w 25310 2 !00. 76.6x% 6 7 _5 5 j 4 23.37w 199994 17,9!% 4 S 5 . A 6% 4 6 4 /--. -2. (:)7% 50. 49% 71 -C).44% !00. 0 0: 77.16% 1 7.s8% 0 0 � �� ('F FY Of N 10( "NI MAYOR, CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER . The construction and remodeling of city hall during 1990 was an interesting experience for all of the City staff. The staff should be commended for the excellent job they dial in working under less than ideal conditions during the construction activity. We appreciate the move back into the new and improved city hall offices. The City financial matters cross all department lines. It is important to be able to work effectively with personnel from all City departments. The Council and staff will have to meet the challenges of the upCoc,ing changes in the local government aid system. I am confident w- can come up with solutions to the dif'r`icult budget decisions we face in the future. I look forward to a challenging and productive year in 1991. Respectfully, John L. Nurcr,an Finance . rector JN:ls ""'t/�, nave enc1 o„ed the 199C Annual Report of the Fi nance I'e�;ar?mw-r?t. The purpo_;e of the report is to point out the fi.nan� -al condition of the City of Mound, to the City Council, whit-'h sets the policies that direct the future cf this City. The fin<racial recaps included in this report provide you with a preli; :'.nar °y , ummary of the City of Mound's financial position for 1990. . The construction and remodeling of city hall during 1990 was an interesting experience for all of the City staff. The staff should be commended for the excellent job they dial in working under less than ideal conditions during the construction activity. We appreciate the move back into the new and improved city hall offices. The City financial matters cross all department lines. It is important to be able to work effectively with personnel from all City departments. The Council and staff will have to meet the challenges of the upCoc,ing changes in the local government aid system. I am confident w- can come up with solutions to the dif'r`icult budget decisions we face in the future. I look forward to a challenging and productive year in 1991. Respectfully, John L. Nurcr,an Finance . rector JN:ls ""'t/�, first resj,, risibility 1 have is the supervision of the Finance* D< , ♦,r?.r: t Staff• The following is the current personnel in the .ri,.rtitr'rt . TITLE 6ay_t� Finance Director Utility Billing Clerk As essir.g Clerk Account Clerk Senior Account Clerk LUIS __.5ABUQUIZI Lois h-zr :files the approximately 3150 cyclical basis (the addition, there are a bill every month. ST6.RTINQ_.DA E 9 -16 -85 2 -01 -70 7 - 28 - 75 12 - 21 - 77 4 - 16 - 79 water and sewer billing process. We have residential accounts that are billed quarterly on a City is divided into three billing districts). In approximately 125 commercial accounts that receive We have numerous rental properties ie Mound. Under State Statute, the utili`y bill stays with the property, i.e., the owner is liable for the 1.11 if the renter leaves an unpaid utility bill. We run into this situation frequently. Any adjustments to utility billing accounts must be approved by me. 0 We average around 50 residents a month on the turnoff list for non payment. Our philosophy is to try to work with the resident to pay off their bill. Lois is very fair and works with the resident in setting up a contract giving them extra time to pay their bill. However, we are providing a service to the resident and eventually the bill must be paid. With approximately 600 turnoff letters sent each year, we only have one or two residents that have a "problem" with the way they were dealt with by City Staff. DELORE S _ S..0WALBE Dee does the special assessment searches for properties which are requested by realtors, title companies or residents when a house in Mound is purchased. We charge $10 a parcel for a search. Dee also receipts a any prepayments of special assessments. Wh -n a property is sold or refinanced, usually assessments are paid off. We notify the County of the prepayment (the County collects all current special assessments on the tax statements) . They then remove the assessment from future years assessment rolls. During 1990 we colaected $89,186 on prepayments for various special assessment levies. This money is invested to pay off the special assessment bonds when they become due. Is -/ / 3 Dee also is the administrator of the Metro HRA Section 8 Rent Assistance Program for Mound, as well as for Mi nnetr13ta, St. Bonifacius and Spring Park. Currently, there are 40 families in our area receiving Section 8 assistance. Some of Dee's responsibilities inelUde meeting with new applicants, yearly re -exams to determine continued eligibility and on site Housing Quality inspections. There also is time for mailing out verifications, follow up letters and corresponding with Metro Council office. The City gets reimbursed monthly cn a per residence basis, currently $14.32. Revenue collected during 1990 was $5,474. Dee also helps fill in for the Building Department when they are unavailable. Gayle works in the following areas: Licensing - this includes sending out renewal notices, receipting and verifying all the proper paperwork is filled out (insurance requirements), follow up to get it to the Council on time. } Dog Licenses - Tags are good for a two year period. Rabies information must be included on application. We have approximately 850 dog licenses issued to Mound residents. l Dock Licenses - During January and February we receive approximately 450 dock applications. A form letter is sent out to those with missing information. - Inputting into the computer for the finance system. - Miscellaneous billing and reports for other agencies - Assist in reports for the Liquor Store: daily receipting monthly sales tax reports, NSF checks - Does bank reconciliation - Renting out of the Depot The Depot rental income decreased over the last year: 199.Q 19$9 19U 1482 1986 $1000 $1310 $1500 $1000 $1150 • 2 -7 4/y A11I21_. EISIJU Judy � ak,es sure all the bills that are sent to the City get paid on time. The bill must be coded to the proper account so budget to actual comparisons are meaningful. The incoming bills are grouped and entered into the co mputer and brought to the Council for authorization of payment. We try to pay as many bills as possible= at th two Council meetings. However, checks are done manually for items such as liquor bills in order to take advantage of all discounts. Judy also mainta4 rs payroll records and gets the payroll processed every two weeks. All timesheets must be reviewed and entered into the computer, checks generated and reports printed. Also, taxes, insurance, deferred comp and other deduction records are kept and timely payments must be sent. Payroll duties include quarterly reports and year -end reports sent to the State and other agencies. Judy also prepares the N -2 and 1099 forms to be distributed to employees and vendors. Judy is Deputy Treasurer and does the investing of city funds when I am gone. Judy also handles the worker's compensation reports for the City, and the OSHA reports and summaries. In addition, to the above listed items we are the information window and receive the payments for utility bills and licenses, permits and homestead cards. The staff rotates staying until 7:30 PM each Tuesday night so residents can come in if they are not able to do so during normal working hours. The Finance Staff does an excellent job in dealing with Mound residents. I have received a number of compliments on the helpfulness and friendliness of the Finance Staff. INVESTMENTS Cash management and investment of City funds is an important aspect of my job. The first objective in investing City funds is safety and legal constraints. Taking safety into account, I look for the best market rate of return, normally within a 3 -6 month range. I continue to follow a policy of investing only with broker /dealers in this state. The following is a breakdown of investments as of December 31, 1990: J.S. Government ALenc_Q;; U.S. Treasury Securities Commercial Paper Certificates of Deposit Government Trust Pool TOTAL $2,687,547 922,703 2,198,135 1,279,755 5�3Z.64Q $7,725,740 is 11 q6 3 1 Sit 19iTZ - 1983 1984 19as 1986 19$7 19ad 1 sag 1990 1991 Pmw 0 END OF YEAR 9A MCE The total outstanding debt at the end of 1981 was $13,360,000. The debt will decline to $6 : 7903,000 by the end of 1991 If no new bonds are issued over the next four years, the balance in outstanding bonds would be reduced to $4 million by the end of .1994. This graph illustrates the fact that Mound is a mature suburb and has not had to issue debt to develop new streets and watermains. For example, cities of our size that have been rapidly expanding have the following debt outstanding at the end of 1989: Chanhassen $35,309,620 Chaska $28 540 000 Champlin Shakopee I $26 , 904, t30o $15,380,000 6 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIES The general property tax levy is discussed every year during the budget. excess. The otter significant it on the tax statement for Mound residents are the various special assessment levies. The f Ol -1 ow -Ir g JLs -, the annual special assessments levied on :Mound taxpatyers during tk,e 19801s: 1981 $804,000 P 1982 1,489,700 1983 1,353,,400 1984 1,234',600 1985 1,1G',100 1986 992,000 1987 870,800 1988 740,700 1989 696,000 1990 633,593 The major street projects were completed in 1978 -1980. The total assessments on the taxpayers increased dramatically once these projects were assessed. Since 1982, the annual assessments, have consistently declined. The corresponding Special Assessment bonds payable has decreased from $12,833,000 in 1981 to 114,775,000 in 1890. AUDIT Preparing for the annual audit is another important responsibility in MY job. I prepare all the statements, schedules and notes to the financial statements for the annual audit. Our audit costs are reduced since all the statements and notes are done in house. The 1989 audit report received the National GFOA award "Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ". The certificate program ,judges an audit report on various criteria, including clarity, comparability and completeness. This is the second consecutive year the City of Mound has received this award. I plan on updating the audit report annually and submit future years reports for this award. INSURANCE We have the majority of our insurance coverage with the `League of Minnesota Cities Insurarce Trust. They have provided the City with good coverage and the costs for insurance have stabilized in the last couple of years. Our agent of record is Earl Bailey of R.L. Youngdahl A Associates, Inc. I have the responsibility of coordinating the City's insurance activity. I file all claims that are made against our insurance policies for the City automobiles, property damage and general liability. I would like to thank Judy Fisher for her good work in handling the worker's compensation claims. COMPUTER OPERATIONS It is �iy job to supervise the overall computer operation. We have an on-site mini - computer processor with software purchased !from Co putos'ervice, Inc. The hardware CPU has had no downtime in 42. months. . The f of l cw i ng sof tware programs are currently operating on ou * 5yst.e : utility billing, financial, accounts payable, payroll and special assessments. Also, the police department shares the computer with the police package ENFORS. The finance staff does an , excellent job working can the computer operations. The computer industry i always changing as technology advances* The next, generation of computer is here, with more Memory capacity and faster processing time. Also, the new computers are smaller i,h size and less 'expensive than the computers they are replacing. The'momor y capacity on our existing computer will be full: by the end of 1991. A big reason for this is the accumulating effect the police data files have ; in taking up computer memory. We will have to begin looking at alternatives and solutions to meet our future computer needs. FUND STRUCTURE The following is a description of the funds of the City of Mound: GENERAL FUND The General Fund accounts for the Revenues and Expenditures to carry out the basic governmental activities of the City, such ass administration, police, inspections, streets and parks. General Fund expenditures are made primarily for current day to day 'operating expenses. Major sources of revenue are the property tax and local government aid. The undesignated unreserved fund balance of the General Fu"d is projected to be $542,766 for the year ended 1990. The balance increased $4,600 during the year. It is important for the City to maintain th current fund balance. This reserve is necessary to meet >' expenses in the General Fund until tax money and l government aid comes in July (That is if we receive LGA). 8 The following table shows previous year end General Fund balances, cOmp�ired to adopted expenditures budget of the following year: GENERAL FUND TOTAL FUND BALANCE BUDGET BEGINNING OF YEAR 1985 $1,640,567 $415,590 25.3 1986 1,855,109 533,599 2$.6 1987 2,073,720 743,810 35.9 19$8 1,128,550 803,207 3T•9 ` 1989 2,236,430 749,654 33.5 1990 2,327,090 629,326 .0 r 1991 2,264,150 642,934 2.4 B - VEN E;j Revenues received for general governmental operations are $x,301.505. The following' is an analysis of the major revenue sources of the General Fund - budget to actual for 1990: BUDGE TAXES $1,187,190 ACTUA VARIARG $1,224,100 $36,910 A BNCA1Ct�� 103.1 LICENSES & PE 96,650 72,190 (24,460) INTERGOVERNMENTAL 855`,860 867,657 11 ,797 101 .4 COURT FINES 95, 000 73 ,967 (21 ,043) 77 .8 MISCELLANEOUS 84,100 63,601 20,499 75.6 TOTAL $2,318,800 =2,301,505 *17,295 99 «3 A major concern over the past two years was the increase in delinIquent tax receivables. The increase was due to the Balboa Corp.," the largest 11 tarpayer" in Mound not paying any taxes on their H facility. The good news during 1990 was the payment of the current and delinquent taxes by the owners of the Balboa ,property. The following shows the total delinquent taxes receivable at year end for the City of Mound. 1987 $67,587 1988 122,602 1 989 165,027 1 99 0 57,277 '1 9 t EX.P,E JQ T J U f(E.S Expenditures for general government operations were $2,287,446 in 1990. The following is a budget to actual comparison by department: R.E1'A$TI'INT.5 B..1l1LGET JJCTUA Y,A,RIANCE I EXPENDE t� Mayor and Council $53,890 $61,260 $2,630 95.9 City Manager /Clerk 166 : 310 168,709 (2,399) 101.4 Elections 11,400 11,562 (162) 101.4 Assessing 43,320 42,652 668 98.5 Finance 162,030 162,555 (525) 10043 Computer 22,150 1 9,6 4 7 2,503 88.7 Legal 80,900 61,314 19,586 75.8 City Property 72 ,050 76,677 (4 106.4 Police 717,850 740,208 (22,358) 103.1 Planning & Insp. 145,000 129,652 15, 348 89.,4 Civil Defense 2,750 2,105 645 76.6 Streets 382,890 384,277 (1,387) 100.4 Recycing 60,670 82,626 (21056) 136.2 Shops & Stores 53 ►590 56,481 (2 1 05.4 Parks 159,870 148,083 119787 92.6 Other 40,150 19,062 21,088 47.5 , Transfers 122,270 120, 1,694 98.6 TOTAL $2,307,090 $ 2,287 , 4 46 19 99.1 The Recycling expenditures of $82,626 was offset by $67 of grants from Hennepin County. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are used to account for certain ` ;ax levies and other earmarked revenue. The following is a list of the City's Special Revenue Funds and Fund balances as of 12 -31 -90 Cemetery $1,312 Pension 88,640 CDBG -0_ Area Fire Ser. 4,301 Dock (9,146) The Area Fire Service balance decreased from $187,116 in 1989 to $4,301 due to the purchase of a rescue vehicle for $203,085. The Dock Fund deficit will be funded by dock permit revenues in 1991. 10 "'Z�� CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Capi t rl project funds have been established to segregate funds to be used for various types of capital outlay expenditure. in e Iriy 1996, all of the bonds outstanding in the Capital In provfinents Oe.bt Services fund were called in early. This fund included all bonds issued before 1978. The remaining balance (approxlmaL ely $1,800,000) was transferred to a Capital Projects Fund. The following is the 1990 activity of this fund: CITY OF MOUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND P. 1990 ACTIVITY BALANCE 1 -1 -90 $2,275,643 REVENUES' $154,042 TOTAL AVAILABLE $2,429,685 EXPENDITURES BOND COSTS $442,099 STOPLIGHT -110 & LYNWOOD $35,525 DEPOT DECK $18,394 ISLAND PARK ROOF REPAIR $18,743 CBD LOT ACQUISIT;JN $49,077 PW STORAGE $124 PHONE SYSTEM $4,873 CITY HALL $836,297 CITY HALL- SOIL CONTAMINATION $21,908 CITY HALL MISCELLANEOUS $25,506 TOTAI, EXPENSES $1,452,546 BALANCE REMAINING $977,139 'there remains to be paid additional costs for construction and accessories for city hall. Other potential uses identified for this fund include purchase of CBD lots, costs to solve Lost Lake storage pile issue, and financing a fire bay addition. The Capital Improvements Fund is an important one -time source for the City of Mound. It allows the City to undertake projects that benefit the City without having to issue debt to finance them. HUNIC _rl'.AL CQNL This fund is the remaining balance and assessments from the 1981 MSA Fund. The fur: is used for department capital outlay 1991; expenditures included: Prelimina -y Lost Lake storage costs $752 Preliminary Depot Rehab costs 595 Preliminary CBD lot acquisition 2,068 imberwall repair 17,964 'ark Improvements 13,493 'arks Capital Outlay Sprayer & trailer 970 1 90 4x4 Chev truck with plow 15,527 1 ton truck 24 Playground structures - Chester Park 6,324 Gibson refrigerator - Depot bldg. 589 Chev truck box 800 �:EAL,�AT This fund is a five - year rotation to sealcoat the streets in Mound. The total cost of the project for 1990 was $43,161, which was financed by the Liquor Store profits. ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise Funds are used to account for the financing of services to the general public in which all or most of the revenues are generated from user charges. L19JO U ND 1990 was a good year for the Liquor Store. Profits are up from 1989 and $13,200 over the projected profits in the 1990 budget. A condensed summary for the liquor operations for the years ended December 31,1990, 1989 and 1988 is presented below: 1990 1989 1988 Sales $939,285 $892,028 $875,578 Cost of Sales 721,2 U3,5 675.5 GROSS PROFIT 218,475 208,475 199 ,994 Exp enses 1.2.1161 159,3_ -kQ 153.,gR. Operating Income 55,251 48,726 46,046 Other Income 8,785 7,422 6,244 Transfers Out C4 1.1LU (49- LRDIQ221 NET INCOME 20,875 6,399 12,290 12 �� W116 - FLIJ4D A ;r en,e summ�iry of the Water Fund operations for the years ended e.�r 31 , 1 990, 1989 and 1988 is presented below: 1".Q 1989 1988 � ?r vc,r,t es $337,819 $346,898 $378,775 X F r ,,, -S Li5l 31.61 (326, (256,0 . Incom ( Loss) ( 13,497) 20,303 122,750 Oti)e,r nc,omelRxpenses , , i n c l u d i n g ;. nterest on bonds) 2 - 1 - 13 6 - 5 17 5.423 Net Income (Loss) 10,868 37,975 127,773 Transfer to City (55,000) 1990 revenues remained stable from 1489 to 1990. Expenses were up mainly due to some large wat• amain bre =,s ar.d repairs to water system and equipment. The cash balance in the grater fund decreased from $348,918 to $343,506. A condensed summary of December 31, 1990, 1989 the Sewer Fund operations for and 1988 is presented below: the years ended 19SQ la a 19 $ 8 Revenues $583,951 $588,892 $592,307 Ex A - 0.4 34 5699,2$91 ( Opera Ling Loss (46,483) (5,397) 20,935 Other Tncome 9.6,.119. $7.690 m4 u Net Income 49,636 82,293 91,903 The revenue in the Sewer Fund has remained steady over the past 4 years (the last sewer rate increase was 1- 1 -86). Expenses were up due mainly to the MWCC. The cash balance stands at approximately $1,000,000 at the end of 1990 The large cash balance has enabled the City to continue the expensive process of upgrading the lift stations without having to issue debt to pay for the expense. During 1991, we are upgrading five lift stations at an estimated cost of $240,000. Each year we will examine the existing cash balance and decide whether the entire improvement can be supported from the current rate structure and reserves. .�� 13 f.b1?.LOI ACQUE31110S A w:'iJor° : , iect. during, 1990 was the assessment of the CBD business for t ht< pur .h"ise of Dakota Rail Parking 1: ts. The difficult Port, w;r to co.ine up with an equitable basis to distribute the :r ( :IS.- t n' . 'ne t,ave a few businesses that have sufficient parking to m eet tr;e•i r° own parking requirements. Converse` y, we have businesses thi t hl-lve no pc'irki ng to take care of their customers. After examining otl e•r : ut- n..rio -s, we ended up modifying the existing CBD maintenance formula for assessing the acquisition of the parking lots. I "crunct }e=d" a nurnber of computer runs using different cost amounts and various perce=ntage splits. At a special Council meeting, a 50150 split with the business owners was approved by the Council. After all of the work to get the assessment roll approved, the issue is still uncertain due to Dakota Rail. I hope this can be resolved without having to redo the assessment hearing process. The City has significant costs already from the work that our engineer, attorney and city staff has put in on this project. PHS)l�.. �Y STEl��EPLA�EHEt�.T Another major project during 1990 was the replacement of the city hall and public works phone systems. Our old system was obsolete and had numerous deficiencies, including only one intercom path, no interconnection between city departments, no privacy on lines and the number of lines was limited. We started the process of phone replacement in 1989 and put it on hold for the completion of the new city hall in 1990 After analyzing various systems in the market, we recommended the Centrex system from Contel as the beat solution for our phone needs. The following are some of the advantages Centrex has to offer: 1. Unlimited intercom paths within entire city facilities. 2. Calls can be transferred to any phones located within the city (the person calling can be taken care of with one call instead of given numbers to other city departments). 3. The only equipment on site are phone sets - no other equipment necessary. 4. Power failure will not impact phones since Centrex has no electrical requirement. 5. Direct -In -Dial feature - Each phone set is actually assigned a separate telephone number (this can eliminate time spent by receptionists that they could use to perform other duties). 6. Phone will not become easily obsolete (Centrex is software driven and new updates can be programmed into existing phone sets). 7. City can save on business line trunks by pooling lines for the city locations (for example, instead of using 6 lines for police, 6 lines for city hall, 4 lines for public works, 1 line for liquor store, etc., 10 business lines shared by all should be sufficient under Centrex). 14 -7S& S. One vendor (Contel - locally based) will be responsible for all tlt1E'� �t�ti1 e'1�t11�'t'1tnt,. We 1 -1: e hzad t.t.C- Centrex systern since September 1990. Centrex has been a 900ct 010rne system for the City. There are some enhancements we would l ike to see implemented. Since Centrex is software driven, we will be able to receive the enhancements without changing any phone sets or hardware. I would 1 ike to thank the member of the phone committee, especially Linda Strong, for the time and involvement on the phone selection process. ORGAB12AT.>; 01S I am a member of the Minnesota Government Finance Officers Association (MGFOA). There are currently 550 members. There are monthly meetings in the metro area and an annual conference held in the fall of the year. During 1990, I was elected by the membership to be the Treasurer of MGFOA in 1991. This means that I will be on track (Secretary, Vice President) to be President in 1994 This is an excellent opportunity and challenge to look forward to over the next few years. An interesting aspect to being President of MGFOA in 1994 is that the National GFOA Conference (approximately 4000 - 7000 delegates attend) will be held in Minneapolis in the summer of 1994. I am a member of the Minnesota Society of CPAs. One of the requirements of keeping current my CPA certificate is that I maintain a continuing ei.acation program each year. Continuing education and training is a high priority in my professional development. I get the vast majority of my education credits through MGFOA. I attend all meetings of the Economic Development Commission as an ex- officio member. I look forward to 1991 as being a successful year in getting the downtown implementation moving forward. In 1990, I was elected as the President of the Mohawk Jaycee's I am also Treasurer of the Mound Crime Prevention Association. 0�10fi I have tried to point out the areas of special note in the operation of the Finance Department. I nave worked on various projects and have researched information for the City Manager throughout the year. I am also required to fill out numerous surveys and reports to send to other governments and other organizations. I will be attending the March 26th Council meeting to answer any questions that you have regarding my annual report. • -7 5 -7 15 M�uao POLICE 4 MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472 -3711 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544 -9511 EMERGENCY 911 Janury 17, 1991 TO: Ed Shukle FROM: Len }carrell SUBJECT: Amendment to Ordinance 546.50 Attached is the amendment to our current ordinance 546.50 involving the quarantining of animals in bite situations. There have been concerns by citizens whose pets have bitten family members or good friends and where our ordinance would still require the dog be removed and quarantined. By amending the ordinance as attached and addressing how we would handle bite situations through policy, I believe we can do a better job of determining when a dog has to be removed. I recommend the attached amendment be sent to Jim Larson and have also attached the policy for the department. 0 - 7 15 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT EFFECTIVE DATE; _ SECTION :' DEPARTMENT MANUAL February 1, 1991 586. TITLE?: ANIMAL IMI"OUND,; DISTRIBUTION: � RESCINDS: ALL PERSONNEL January 2, 1990 586. PURPOSE To assure uniformity in the procedure for the impounding and release of animals by the Mound Police Department. 586.10 PROCEDURE 1. All impounded animals will be brought to Reo Raj Kennels unless the owner can be notified and arrange for pick -up at the Department. a. owners of animals that have been impounded must pay administrative charges, but will not be issued citations. Those charges are outlined and available at the Police Department counter. h. Owners of animals that are picked up and where the animal is returned to the home or followed home will receive citations under Mound ordinance. In no instance shall both a citation and administrative charges be levied against the same individual. C. Animals impounded at kennel other than Reo Raj are to have an impound filled out. Impounds to other than Reo Raj will have approval of a supervisor. 586.20 ANIMAL BITES /QUARANTINE 1. An officer may allow home quarantine of an animal that has bitten under the following conditions: a. The animal is properly licensed as required by ordinance. b. Documentation presented verifying current rabies vaccinations for animal. -75� MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT MANUAL TITLE: ANIMAL IMPOUrNDS SECTION NO. 5 C The animal has not been cited or impounded for running at large within the past 12 months. 2. The Code Enforcement Officer shall periodically check on any animal under home quarantine. At the end of the 10 day period, the Code Enforcement Officer will notify the victim of a bite in the event the animal is found to be ill. 586.30 REPORTS FORM 1. Officers will use the normal animal impound report form, but will mark boldl across the top, "Home Quarantine." The form will then be placed in the animal impound folder as done with all impounds, until the 10 day period is over. 2. The Code Enforcement officer will forward the report to be filed after the quarantine as is current practice with impound forms. • 7(00 LAW Of VICES WURST, f ? EARSON, LARSON, UNDERWOOD & MERTZ wa .y�w11— .w:.:i U•— — 11 —L •aatK .wTrc,ws ijQ() FIRST BANK PLACE WEST A .. A ". a MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 rc4cn„o.+r near iS 164) 336 -4200 �• : � M'rw•e September 17, 1990 1612t 336 2625 :3�3r�..N ; e',,artx,ent. Mouniii MN 55 364 re: Dog Quarantine Dear Len• Enclosed is a proposed ordinance to give you or your designee the authority to direct a home quarantine. You said you would draft a policy. It might be a good idea to have the proposed policy available when this goes to the council. If you like the draft, give it to Ed with your recommendation for approval. sincerely yours, James D. Larson JL :imk enclosure - 7 (0l 0 ORDINANCE 1990 - A N t M�""ND CITY CODE SECTION 456:50 BY GRANTING AN' HIS DESIGNEES THE AUTHORITY TO ORDER THE AN: MA is c: t ne Mound City Code is amended by i try +r.1t1rlinei language thereto. 456:50, Quar Any animal which bites a pf shall be quarantined for such time as may be 'air {','ted by thN City Health Officer. During quarantine, the animal shall be securely confined and kept from contact. with any other animal. At the discretion of the Health Officer, the quarantine may be on the premises of the owr:or; however, if the Health Off cer requires other confinement, the owner shall surrender the animal for the quarantine period to an animal shelter or shall, at his or her expense, place it in a veterinary hospital. For the purposes of this section, Health Officer shall include the Chief of Police and any peace officer design by the Chief of Police to direct a quarantine under this section Mayor Atte City Clerk Published in official newspaper on , ' L�— TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER ' l RED- RECOMMENDED 1991 BUDGET CUTS TO MEET JULY LGA CUT A 4';�1 kn�,�w, 1sovt.,rri6r Arne Carlson has proposed significant cuts to c:it.ie�s. ';over nor Carlson has proposed a $ 313 million cut over the 1991" -9 3 1 biennium. He has also proposed, and the lt?gisltiture ha: 'already acted, on a $21 million cut for the July 1991 Aid payment. He has proposed, although the legislature has not acted yet, an additional $21 million cut out of the December 1991 Aid payment. Obviously, this has a significant impact on cities' ability to provide services in a budget that has already been prepared, discussed and approved by yourselves for the 1991 budget year. The 1991 budget included estimation of $360,000 from LGA to the City of Mound's general fund. John Norman, Finance Director, and myself have been working on how to deal with the cuts in aid. We have reached the conclusion that it is not in the City's best interest to absorb the approximately $40,000 of cuts out of the General Fund reserve. It is more important to deal with this crisis "head on ". Hence, we have analyzed the General Fund portion of the 1991 budget and have arrived at the following cuts: 1 7{ 3 AaQ"1 BesW-C'esi 1 Ly _.-Matl.ag e rl CLLi 2210 Motor Fuels $100 3100 Professional Services 200 PQ1iQe 3340 Use of Personal Auto 100 3$10 Auto Equipment Repair 2,000 4120 Meeting Expense $00 4130 Dues & Subscriptions 100 4260 Microfilming 150 4120 Meeting Expense 100 L.Lr. a C-" 2310 Equipment, Parts & Tires 1,000 1 7{ 3 200 1 1 500 " 500 Will 101;MY !L blllulng;� 500 500 ~t ; ce supplies 400 Equipm nnt Pam 600 Tel ephone 100 &a:. Service 500 Subtotal $9,350 Adjust Recycling Coordir :ator's Salary by charging to Recycling Fund 6,000 Adjust salaries of Finance Department to reflect time spent in Liquor fund, Water fund & Sewer fund 21,000 Balance from Contingency 3,355 Total $39,705 As you can see, we have been able to reduce line items and make some other adjustments in order to reach the figure of $39,705, the official amount to be reduced from the July 1991 LGA payment as certified by the Department of Revenue. As I stated above, we will be facing an additional cut in the December 1991 LGA payment. At this time it is estimated to be the same amount as the July 1991 payment, or $39,705. 1 believe that it is important that we analyze our budget again and look at cutting service levels which translates into reduced staffing in order to come up with cuts to meet the December 1991 LGA cut. I don't believe that we should take these funds out of the General Fund Reserve. We are going to face more cuts in 1992 and probably 1993, and I don't think we should delay the problems by absorbing them out of the reserve. I think we should begin attacking the problem now. We will have some time to analyze thi as to what services ought to be cut. 1 will make recor; to you. 1 woul l also like you to consider what n rvice.s we ought to be looking at and we can tai k more about it at future Committee of the Whole meetings as we approach the 1992 budgFtt preparation process. If ycu have any questions, please contact me. cc: Department Heads E;S :ls 2 -7 • RESOLUTION f91 RESOLUTION APPROVING 1991 BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS DUE: TO LGA CUTS IN THE JULY 1991 LGA PAYMENT WHEREAS, <<,overnor Arne Carlscn has proposed significant .gut_ in t'r.e i.oc :.. i.jiOverrmient Aid (LGA) to cities, and; WHEREAS, ',overnor Carlson has proposed a $313 million out over tt;e 1 .92 1993 biennium, and; WHEREAS, he has proposed, and the legislature has already acted on, a $21 million cut for the July 1991 aid payment, and; WHEREAS, he has proposed, although the legislature has not acted yet, an additional $21 million cut out of the December 1991 aid payment, and; WHEREAS, these cuts have a significant impact on the City of Mound's ability to provide services in a budget that has already been prepared, discussed and approved by the City Council for the 1991 budget year, and; WHEREAS, the 1991 budget includes an estimated revenue from LGA of $360,000. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mound City Council hereby approves 1991 budget reductions in the General Fund per the recommendation of the City Manager dated March 19, 1991, which is made a part of the resolution, which incorporates the following reductions: Am.Q.ian .L_2-e d uc z d .�i.t Y_ L°ia tL g n r1_.�.1� k 2210 Motor Fuels $100 3100 Professional Services 200 'a - 3340 Use of Personal Auto 100 3810 Auto Equipment Repair 2,000 4120 Meeting Expense 800 4130 Dues & Subscriptions 100 4260 Microfilming 150 Planni .Qnz 4120 Meeting Expense 100 ZI r"l 2310 Equipment, Parts & Tires 1,000 3220 Telephone 200 1 07(, - LJ 2 0 7(0 / 4:5 L: 1,500 teria s 500 el e F Uki 500 10 a3:3 c.ery c:e 500 1 r'i F, r & Maintenance Supplies 400 31 Equirment Farts 600 3 3K' ? L e I e ph o re 100 37 0 Gas Service 500 a Subtotal $9,350 Adjust recycling Coordinator's Salary by charging to Recycling Fund 6,000 Adjust salaries of Finance Department to reflect time spent in Liquor fund, Water fund & Sewer fund 21,000 Balance Total from Contingency 3,355 $39,705 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council directs the staff to continue to analyze the 1991 budget and to look at cutting service levels which translate into reduced staffing in order to come up with cuts to meet the December 1991 LGA cut. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council agrees to look at cutting service levels which translate into reduced staffing in anticipation of cuts to be made by the State in the December 1991 LGA cut, rather than absorbing the cuts out of the General Fund Reserve. The following councilmembers voted in the affirmative: The following councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Attest: City Clerk 2 0 7(0 / 4:5 T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER RE: APPROVAL OF LABOR CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320, PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE UNIT FOR 1989 AND 1990 As you know, the Public Works Labor Agreement had expired December 31 1988 Since that time the City has negotiated with the Public Works Unit and has had several delays that have caused the 1989 -1990 contract to not be resolved. Recently, the City and Teamster's Local #320, Public Works, met before a mediator and resolved the labor dispute for the 1989 - 1990 contract p( , The following represents the changes to the contract: ARTICLE II. REL � Delete "Section 179.71, Subdivision 3 as amended 1983, "and insert "179A.03 subd. 3." ARTICLE 111. 010 _ z -Q.0 ZTY 3. (fifth line) Delete 11 179.65, Subdivision 2," and insert 0 179.06, subd. 3 ". ARTICLE XX 3BU.EANC 20.1 (third line) Delete "dependent" and insert "family ". Retain remainder of current language providing for 85% City contribution. is • ARTICLE XXX UGEE EA,i.r1T.F.NAXU__H,E,U,N To start After 12 months After 24 months l�1T... EltP�Y.L�.4.II S 1911 199Q 10.92 11.14 12.23 12.47 13.68 13.95 15.5 16.66 1 (ol • o v v eul p o y k , e in t c I & s s i i ca t i o n f r e c e v a u tri s u a) n () r; - S e ',+ . ille I allp -sum Li:hall be as C tf rn t r 31 Cf' the previou- year. V :4 r �-)8,9, through December 31 , 1 990 . , 1 � r e , - , o 1 u t i o r , a p p r o v i rig the I a bor agreement n u a r y 1989 throu�,h December 31 , 1 990. 1 YOU �ippt'OVe the contract settlement as proposed. Y ':,A V t r, qU�aOtiOnS, please contact me. • E 2 -APY • RE ,OLUTION 191- HKsoLwr1()N APPROVING THE LABOR CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MOUND AND TEAMSTER'S LOCAL 1320 PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE UNIT FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1989 - DECEMBER 31, 1990 WHERVAS, the City of Mound and Teamster's Local #320, !,-, Unit, have gone through the collective to procenn and negotiated a labor contract for the , 1 '-', ') tr",!.('U ,n i)e,C emLer 31 , 1990 period, and WHEREAS, both sides have reached the final agreement jut vptnble to both the City's negotiators and the ir4 unit'L w4rAiators. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Mound and Teamster's Local 041, i4blir Works Maintenance Unit have reached -i""Liumunt un the J;�nuary I , I 98Q through December 31 , 1990 Lwract pa the mA belete "Section 179.71, Subdivision 3 as amereed 1983, "and i " IY9 A . O? , - . 3 A FIT I (" I . K 1 11 . ! hl& ; ,E'ULITY 3. ( fi f th 1 1 ne ) Delete 179.65 , Subdivision 2 and insert :9.06, subd. 3 AK11CLE XX .1 N_S,L N �.E 20.1 (third line) Delete "dependent" and insert "family". Retain remainder Of CLArrent language providing f or 85% City contribution. A I; I'l (' E X X X W-1 � E� ,M1i.N_TE.N,A.N,.4.L_ ?E_FLLQIN To start After 12 months After ?4 months WAIT 15PLIVASE 190 1 AD 10.92 11 .14 12.23 12.47 13.68 13-95 15-53 16.66 * In addition to the aLcvn employees in the classification of Maintenance Perrun shall receive a 1.5% lump sum non-base inLreawe in 1989 and 1990. The lump sum shall be calculated as 1.5% of regular salary as of December 31 of the previcus year. AHTICLE XXXII. D_UEATJQN Effective January 1 1989, through December Y , 1990. • • _70 OL I.- e E • jo rrw : TI )'1" fIt PO I OA ATT i:r a !1 a A P UJ J I j j UL P ;4 '10 A ,..I !j E H280LUTlO0 #91- KL30iUTl0N SUPPORTING THE SUBURBAN HEN[NPl0 PARKS LEGISLATION W KEA�. �.vcrnment �uiurtar, Hunne pin on the [�noe�1n �c��"�a� Par� Diutrirt ' y Lux rrvco4�o for �be Kr��vn�i y�rk aysCcm. aod� Hennepin Regional Park District created to develop, manage and 8egiuna l Park system, and is property owners of the Suburban and plan for the expenditure of benefit of the Sluburban Hennepin WHEREAS,, -in independent and democratically elected Subur�an Henncpin B:Vional Park District Board Df Commissioners �� es�cnCial tu puLlio confidence in the activities and priuriCieo cf the 8oard of' Commieuioners, BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the C1ty of Mound. on March 26 1991, expresses unqualified support ,"r lcg1ulatimn before the Minnesota Legislature in the 1991 la�iola�Ive aeuL;ion that would establish the Suburban Hennepin Re�1coal Park District Board of' Commissioners as on all-elected ucv*n memlver board, with commissioner,' representing equal size d1wtrict.x within the &uburban Hennepin Regional Park District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of' Mound on March 26, 1991, expresses unqualified support for legislation befmrt the Minnesota Legislature in the 1991 leAi�;lative session that allows the Suburban Hennepin Rerional Park District Board of Commissioners to formulate and implement annual budgets for the Suburban Hennepin Regional Perk District without review or veto of the Hennepin County Board. The following Council members voted in the affirmative: The [ulIoxio� Cc, uric ilmemberu voted in the negative: A�teaC City Clprk Nayor 0 0 IT • • C K!1 h Ii 1.t3t MN `)` -):364 Dear Mr. Shukle, Jr.: Senate State of Mil -iota We sire, excited tu announce the introduction of legislation in the MinriOSOLd House and Senate to establish the Suburban Hennepin ReCi.cnal Park District (Honnopi.n Parks) Board of Commissioners as an all- elected seven- member board with full autonomy to formulate and implement annual budgets for the parri district. We are writing to ask you to give your city's formal support to this legislation. We have enclosed a copy of the proposed legislation and a sample resolution expressing municipal support for your counc consideration. Currently, the Hennepin Parks Board of Commissioners is a seven - member board with five commissioners elected and two commissioners appointed by the Hennepin County Board. The Hennepin County board also has the authority to review and veto the annual park district budget as formulated by the Hennepin Parks Board. >ince Hennepin Parks is a local unit of government empowered to levy property taxes on the citizens of suburban Hennepin County, we believe the Hennepin Parks Board should be fully accountable to these citizens thrcugh the dc- ocratic cloctior. process. We also believe that as an independent local unit of government, Hennepin Parks should have the power to formulate and implement annual budgets for the park district without review or veto by the Hennepin County Board. F'uri- hr�z,nore, one cannot ignore growing public dissatisfaction with corl.roversies surrounding appointments to the Hennepin Parks Board. We beli.(-.ve an independent and democratically elected Hennepin Parks Board is essential to restore and assure public confidence in the beard's activities and priorities. I? ?y - 2 - • 'rho bill has strong bi-partisan support in both the House and the Senato with Son tors Merriam, McGowan, Riveness and Traub and Segal, Knickerbocker, Garcia, and Limmer joinil", LIS aS (70-21.1thors. We encourage you po help secure passage of this legislation by approving a supporting resolution at your next council meeting. Dedicated citizens working with us will be in contact with your council to assist in this effort and to assure your support is reported to the Legislature. Thank you for supporting an independent and democratic Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District Board of Commissioners and for your efforts to improve local government in Hennepin County. Sincerely, Gen Olson State Senator GO/ke Bill SchCekr State Representative • 77) 11 • • ,Star Tribune Eslabi a h,&,j 1 86 7 ----------- Roger Parkinson P and President Joel R. Kromer Executive Editor Tim J. McGuire managing Editor Robert J. White Evorial Editor — ------------ - Friday = 2' An al!-elected county parks board In 'n 'i 'C' as 4;. L '%"e%tr a split developed be w r e n an:4 appk)! n: - ' - bers. krid when Dom- n "ad '—n appointed to the board -i • a c zin, as defeated in his first tn' for n ,I t! spirt into open war!are. IA I: a n ,, even agret. on xho should Pel—ar,": cn,2:lman� '4 ILI n: CC— 7� I 'I :n pr si-t '.'r L ,,, The a. was at the naianc*z :nt Interests 01 'A f� n a 7 fn On. as P "I ar situation that the Legislature 7, 32,- !�dre:cre has an obhPation to 7z. has more to do here air . o•k r, mistakes. It also nas a duty _finer !naan an-. other — to uphold the demo- c7v:c --)c,-ss and tght of the people to decide I,nc ep%senz - and who should not. ,iola:e b� the Henne- o put Dombrowski a ch 777 ntch the �oters had ousted ndcrpens again. the S curoan Hennepin R d a: z n '-a tt '-een all along: a 7. rnem-e7s eie-te'd by Hennepin P • a ne sane t.rre and .n .:7e same :rar%7er is e-e .'s fs. _ne -115 A oill for an ac* z fela-inj _,: -ne s Hennepin regional park j.5 :ne size of tne beard, rerncjing - cf tne He7neoin county board to review and veto reserve od;et; amending Minnesota Statutes 1990, sect-:cs 3838.68, sut)div-s. !, 3, and 4, and a s and 3838.73, subdivision 1; •epoal.r; minneFcta Statutes 1990, sect.:ns 2839.68, 3933.69. 0 BE :7 BY 7HE :—:"I:S:.ATI-'R-t" OF THE STATE OF M: Seeger L. M.nnes-,ta Statutes 1 -990, sect:.n 3838.68, s.cAiv:sLon amended to read: '3 7ffectjve :anuary l, t993 139 and any pr:vs.Dn �f sec J33.02 _a 398.04, or . .5 ar�y jtner law -c -�.e _re beafj 7f park I:.3tr!Ct '6 ,ne iiennepin cLt.-.tj re na' park !-e5efye er� C- --� -s -o*A sna st se✓ - :7:n � s 3 . ,, e . er e.e as n .n.s Sec. 36 38 . 68, s a°.en2ed . read: F:-ve Seven Pd.-K d-St.'-Ct csr%7.ss..-,ne-s snag. be e:ec ed ai .n.s rep:ese7 .ncse - �-s.Je : 1:7e Z4 park --e party -'e ' na , 26 s n-I .v s ;'n - :)o . : s... sna. I be ne a ne sane t.rre and .n .:7e same :rar%7er is e-e .'s fs. _ne -115 4 / 7 V :S e? .MW KS 91 .791 f 55 a e, y a_ .te 1356 99« ge ,e:a afe s .57. a e' -ea : s.ar _ a res. ier.. f s .. :ea :ese. °..e_ a e - .. �. a -., ;:a_._`.es, ex -a a: .fie - er., __ LF`.. :e ^'. ,.ac.. ...,. ss._ -.e: ale te at _ -.e ge .a_ e.ect__, rel : e ; ea: :: a fede:a: , - .ens�s sr.a- ne ....1y _.c yea :s and a S ces ;. :s e.ec-ed acd :;.a1 :f:es. At _ ^.e ;ere :al :e s7.. ... as :eq,. :ec9 _n s..--d :s :zn 4, -.er°S and t "e twe :ee ec. %miss :one :s _. vP e: s -. _..ts sra :_ be elected for t -year :� ., , :cn;. ; f° m-+ eeaneY- eccars- sn- tne effsee ef - enr- eenus+ssssener _3 e1 -.c-? e, srs�er.t- t�-el.s- seedlvrs:ons- the - a ^e ►d -al- perk- di•r ►se- :� en�nm- ss:-^ trs° sr. e? i- eppez�t- a- saecesscr- resrdrnq - sn - that :6 dsstr- r. t- r.�-fs�i- t�+e- nnexpr ^ed -terw- 1? Se:;. ,. M:n^.esota 5tat.�tes :990, sectitin 3833.68, is 19 by to arpndN :; a subdivision read: i9 S.Cd. ea. f a va cancy occurs in the office of any 20 conm.ss_oner elect furs : ant to subdivision 2 a com missioner 21 sna11 be elected to fill the u nexpire d term in the fi gener 22 eler on ` Iowinq the crea :o of th e vacancy, unless the 23 vacs - v ccc.:rs less t`:ar. 20 days before the ene electron , n 24 whir~ case t. ".e boa of park distric core ^issioners sha'l'l, not 25 ear, :e r t ~ an Februa 'I foll twe genera el ectio n, appoint 26 an inter m c7,7nmiss :over to `:11 tie unexpired term. .f a 27 vaca-.c ccc..rs in t : , f! ce of a _oms : one r 18 0 da or m ore 28 befo t`^.e first gene. al e jection ,oilowing_ vaca •r < ' the vaca the 29 boa :d of�? district Cor missroners T.a app a interim 30 to serve int:l a new c or%�,ssione r is elec Earn 3l drK St C ^ :55 ^•e el!C'! 9r a^ C:nted ;a rt to ' :h *.s "� J 4 h^� 5 S all be a resale ^f 'fie a s` : . • ,.• "ep :ese�. led. S - .. 33 Sec. 4. Minnesota Stat.tes :990, sect.�n 3833.68, 34 s.:ad.v.si:n 4, .s ame ^ded to read. 35 S.:od. 4. After September 1, j985 1991, and after at least 36 30 days' „otiCe and p.olic hearing, the beard of parK district 4 / 7 V ...,-. ,. ,... r .. ..a -E', tu.,_e., _..,, _ne aveY3•:.e _.F a_. _re t .. . - :eq_- remen,t 7eg1.. :es a ^, n - ec..,_ A` -e: each fe a :a: ce ^,s, s and by r. ;1 ", flays Ye c., :u -.e . - eXt r? ^5:4i y2. ^.e :di ... .... 3 "..... 3- - .?,35C . W !,a y i Cie and p,�b:ic ear the. ss._ W_ , ^e sa 5u:ban Herineo :n reserve ...s..•-, sha:_ redistrict ehe its ,._n Y t! &f r+!iecve ""i -3 e•re`_ .nt3 new a ^:e.' .:S "_ »Cs as ";?`eSSd'; W c ^ -rrpiy wit- _ne , v s..... "he str.c - s estab;.shed 3 y s ,....s._.. s ^a_- remain effective :nt.. vier -i e estab_.she An pe:scn aggr•eved by a '0 7 _.__.r.3 p -an es tdb :isheu pu:s -- _c this subd- vision may .ne pia _ne same ,a-.ner as a _cantf c 22 n9 p -an may be r^a- _ ?r;p. p.. r s :a-.t to sect•�n :"5.025. C 7 r . :eV..e.; a.. _ra _.e7 0? _... a '' :7- .•.• se'___ .. .�°.+, ., .�'.� E3�., _sz —, p.__n e5 a. _•s e. L, 5 .,.. __ _...> s_.,....Si .. Ana_. ae ...P-d .•. .n ~.e a_ :e .` r . ^:d .o :: -ennep _,... -y any CG «.e a :-d S r.a•,. :.e e: f Je :a /S a_ - e: -t5 - a`. -.• .: a 7ewscacer :f ce -era. c : .: cc:nty. :er.. M..nes_,a S- a -.. -?s _33;, sect - cn 1818. "3, _ _ .,. _. ..... .. .... 5 .. :d' ..._',P: ^_ ^.7-!Y - ?... d- �.aCd 'el!'t Ye ,:'e >>.,., .' : "rS . ^.d " _ev y _3re5 1n a -. .ne taxab.e 4 _77? 4. ; R EV : 5 CR : AMW K S 9.-179. n sh e Z y a F, d , K district at a rate not exceeding 4 r e :e , ma.ket va�`e- Notw tnstand.nq section .f each yea-, after p I 3f pa: ccrrr.ss.,: sna.', adept a - ,ear ne ;r: r , ne ens.; i 7�; ;ear and snal dete—n. `e t:. amount 1� ne :a-GeI f:::7 a' va_Lrem tax evies to meet its ni 4get - t tne -v3im- y - ncard-, - -The- tr .. w;- n;n- i;- dears- after- the° hedger -was -sabot ►red -b7 -the -diSt!!et ab ^M 0 r 7eett, :a reser�r.- d ;s «r�__- beer!:- after- eor.szderatien -of the eeunty 1 rd Isnb-, et-! tvns-and -pr teat teng T -May- tea pprove-a 6 respect- te .+c8rf tewst ten-!-as -6een-prspesedy-Isy-a-twa-tht ras YT - - f f -tfqte -dtitr t(!t-Board-dees-met-reappreve-a-veteed -.--if-the 19 z «eT i -be-deieted-f rem-the-budget rt ct 21 22 rrod :f tel After adoption of the final 13 b,:dget and no later than Oct-.)oer 1, the superintendent of the 24 park district sha:l certify to the office of the Hennepin county 25 director z. tax and put):;: records exercising the functions of 26 the co auditor tte amount to be raised from ad valorem 27 tax levies to meet its budget for the ensuing year. The 28 !.rector of tax and put)-l.c records shall add the amount of any 19 levy - certified by the !_Strict to otner tax levies on the 30 p of the c-,.;n-y within the district for collection by the 3, of tax and records with other taxes. When 2 c 4, - . r"e jirec.-,:�r Sna-I rraKe settlement ,f such taxes w�t, ected 1 '1 33 - .7e d.sr_ct in t: same manner as otner taxes are distributed 34 -., !ne _-�ner s:bdi in Hennepin count'/. 35 Se:. 6. � REv : SyR : SST. RUCT :ON - 35 :n the next edit ions of minnescta Statutes and Minnesota 4 _77? e 3 7�3 . 3 e 7e a ,e ,e ^u J DdrK e ..a:K�.st'_Ct" ....:.A... . -es I sec zn 38 =9. b 8, s cd: :s:cr, g a:e :ezedlev, .: EC7: %:. _ATE e, '_. 5 an' _-aK e"ec' the d after -re `! p !!_s it board coerpiies w;th �! -a S -a•. -es, se :r i 4 5 . 0 . , subdiv.sior. 3. •f the `_ e a °. : al before Au st 1991 the ..,a..p. s-.a_ be s.nmi - -ed f . a vcte cf the oecple who reside in ^e oa:K a :s`. : :ct a^ a scecial e:. in 1991. - fie question :-e s—,;:bar. ,. en ^ep :n r ee:oral Dark distr ct board ed ` m a a whclly elected body? No _`_ a :ra ^_._`1 cf nsse vv t_na :)n tae quest on 'Jote ves, the ac- s ^a be effective fa: tie 1932 elect and ne:eafter. Sec -ice. S taKP effect ~:e lay af'er ^e suburban Hennepin 7�a:K dis : :C' "�.. 3.'� .,�' PS d ^.es: Statutes, 24 :.e. 645.x`)_ s. ^d - I � 7 • • ( MNARI ,F` L'11 BIR ARCHITECTS PROJECT: tk- "si!1S1iNA t kiINNIAF0Lt5 MN 55426 PROJECT NUMBER: {e r, 9zs�itsd PATE: A RE: AJ f31 P WX4 L" e YXO . tD W R&kk Wil.-I w - p w pw� DW (W) qvp • tt9ly 1* ant )� btv Pt5MlWrW M &n- 1b Tin-- weov . X/t ov-0 pa Sure" �t 4 5 5 Ov * f" 6c#, . OW 1*� tu I El 7po Lfvco� 06 Nu IP m mkv* W. b1,L l Sc4AW • M :.i5 UY uw "� W T*r (o ll�T� � 1 . M e 60tu mi *i . AIL � VI�SS PW . Sc4k d- �k CO *jTODA Of- Rid''. 6LOU A slip --., Ibt�t�p fkAJ T& VM r.� OVw r lb 1 m W p 4N P*rsoj . jsru R&kk Wil.-I w - p w pw� DW (W) qvp • tt9ly 1* ant )� btv Pt5MlWrW M &n- 1b Tin-- weov . X/t ov-0 pa Sure" �t 4 5 5 Ov * f" 6c#, . OW 1*� tu I El 7po • 1.1 • 7 lq3 CATf "3,'19/91 t E D ( -fa GATE t`4 1pl,;. 11,?.'>0 31443 3`!15/91 ,.y furl n`.4,'�? 114' 3 07i91 ?lpTidl 4 . 01 401'0 -{: k EN .G ^ETEF gl -4n, -31C 01 4,4 ,10 FfF ^,iN [ ^_ "'G MFTEF 01 4 CIF ;N Fri; ?G Mi'FP tl 4i of < '417( 3'10 3s }F±F:`i F T1i OTTER 1j EN F { S' ; ItTEI, 01 4'440 3:10 i ). ". 5'` -1EN ✓iJ !u hE :EH 81 -4rk1 -?110 ;`•. f. kf 'FN FjStG IT[k 01-4190-3:10 44 FKK�Tf, of 1EF' 73 73('(; 3 tai 44.;6 kFFl- EN F15(G Pt If 01- 41411 -' "10 1.4`, hf ". f tw) T rf TEh' 01 4 � X1-3:'!0 3.1 '' PF;tiN P T;i PETER 10 -4 ' -t ?10 kEF'EN il '':T6 PETER 01 40�!i 3'10 11.7; GFIA Fif-TG 01- 1190 Aft 4,!lf CITY CATS POSTG 01-119.1 -O(X)O 11.'31 T14 "S'MGSTEPS P9slr 01 10 114,18 FT 1,fN FrXTG PETER 01 -4TX- 1210 t,!el ? >19 b.X,(�) ,>F"A -CD 1010 600.00 31471 3/0$191 VFNIiF TON'# NXI.. ) ks I , 1 0 GYn't3 '�O LIFT STA IW4M 73- 78(ri - °,3m 34, +,31.70 .If -1':u 1010 34631.70 31494 3/19/91 IOTNL ;4631,70 6 "t:�ai F41 F'AIi' 7,1`l 01-264f) -(YxYj 7,178.00 lFtNL -CD 1010 7178.x7 31457 3/07/91 A WIP T(,TA[ 7178.N) Fr'r'." FuT 33.48 kfPLEN Fi[- ESF9 5 01- 23%-0;.KJ 319/91 S!1 °'��1 +,48� CD 1010 ?s.tq 3145 3/19/91 33.48 FkF-PC1CI 24:.X1 F[F,tr [f11VERT 34 °5(X11 31C1T1 • 1.1 • 7 lq3 Tit "T EME:_NT QF_NEE A ND QB,JE TIVE and t- puta+ian of the Suburban Hennepin Regional and renowned system of suburban recreation by trae p laicalty motivated actions of members of who have been directly or indirectly appointed to the of Hennepin County. when the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District gO`Jefriing bo(*y of five elected members and two — Prnhers Cou:,ty tK: the park d;stnrt board has operated with as full for only about 1 months. All remaining time, coritrolle�.d by appointed by the Hennepin County board park district board seats by : park district board coalition of 0 11 tai t ir"' me mt?e fs r:af elected memhe =rt: v, -i polrtical or familial ties to the Hennepin �r!x' F< `r'Ertrt t,<St1!liy tu�,i1'S hlgt �1CTL?u5 efforts to politically control the park tir;tr.r.v tr():ard through the appoir trnefit process has lead to a serious deterioration of pub►ft and legisiatr.e C "o it) the park board's ability and desire to act as a democratic Citizen yr�vf,rfnirnr body wrth the berst rntarests of the park system in mind. The front: (irrle�! city: e7ns of the Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District believe it is turio t:) truly bring d rri:>crat:y lc; the park distrf� board and begin to restore the park system's int,irity carol nrft;unal stature WE CALL ON THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE TO AMEND MINNESOTA STATUTES 383B.68 AND CREATE A SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MADE UP OF SEVEN MEMBERS DEMOCRATICALLY - ELECTED BY THE CITIZENS OF THE SUBURBAN HENNEPIN REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, WE FURTHER ASK THE LEGISLATURE TO GIVE THE DEMOCRATICALLY - ELECTED PARK DISTRICT BOARD FULL AU (HORITY OVER THE BUDGET FOR PARK DISTRICT OPERATIONS, FREE OF HENNEPIN C:)UNTY BOARD REVIEW AND VETO. WE. PFLIEVE THE TIME HAS COME TO PUT THE INTERESTS OF PARKS ABOVE POLITICS A BRIEF HISTORY CONTROVERSY ON THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS t3tIBN �:NP1N RE I NA R DIS 1986-91 e ; ai ejection for park district board commissioners under the five' appointed format, Elected members: David Latvaaho, Bob ,H ;�,�-)_, .;:��' ��.a r�r�� Snir+ey Bonine, Neil Weber. Appointed members` Nick rrs igf is from his elected seat, r Ir?rag den, tee. David Dombrowski is appointed by the park district board to the open eit -;ted board s eat Dombrowski's support comes from the appointed members Ecrlotf �. ^„t Moode7 along witti former DFL state legislator Ellingson and Sonine. Bonine s, 111 turn, electeO bark district .. board chair. N52Y , ,1'i Susan Whitaker defeats incumbent Neil Weber in the tall general election, representing the only change in the board gang in to 1989. Whitaker is elected in spite of public knowledge that she would not servo her term beyond the first few months. speculation is that RAs whitaker was recruited by one or more appointed members of the park district board to run against Commissioner Weber with the intent that she would resign should she win. Afar ,j"q - Susan Whitaker resigns, as expected, from the park district board. Noo„v j 1989 - James White. a lobbyist for the Minneapolis Community Deveinpment Agency, is selected by the park district board to fill the open elected seat. White receives the support of appointed members Eoloff, Moede and Dombrowski, plus support from Ellingson. Former park district commissioner Neil Weber, with the expressed support of 17 suburban area mayors, is denied an interview for the opening during the appointment process. NQy� 192Q - Park district board chair Dombrowski is defeated in his first try for election t o the seat he has held by appointment since 1988. The new duly elected member of the park district board is Bill Weir. #N . 1990 - After it is revealed that he has not lived in his park district for 13 months. elected Commissioner Bob Ellingson is forced to resign from the park district board. Qe� 1119Q - Appointee Nick Eolotf pubiically reveals his interest in applying for park district board appointment to the open Ellingson seat, thus opening a county board appointed seat for a probable return by David Dombrowski '`cmbrowski publically announces his interest in the Ecloff tor-Ellingson, Dombrows' {i for Eolotf swap. more -70 rt wtoo N11 k i is P-(A i )de announces she will not seek red mlMent � � , "' ppo t0 the park dv,ttts - t r - ,� rrt ,,W ,,;�� .�r turf 1, Specilation is that Moede was under pressure to leave tt li,vx d t1tct 0� - from HPi'tnopin County board chair John Derus, former park Dk,frihmwski, and current park district appointees Boloff and YV Cy J,hilh dti,Irict t)Qard.. reduced to or�ty five members, cannot agree to elect a N)001 C"IdIr. Bo Ord ap pointeeb Eoloff and White, citing park district board rules that rc:cAW tr t0ur votes to elect a chair and expressing their desire to delay selection of a t� air until 1t7e board consists of seven mernoers, refuse to participate in good faith in ttirt emir selection process. Speculation is that Eoloff and White are waiting for the Hennepin County board to appoint Dombrowski back on the park district boar'd so Dombrowski can be a park district toard chair candidate. The Hennepin County board akpoirIs Dombrowski to the open county - appointment seat on the park district board, Eo_ 1 i - The park district board appoints Susan Nelson Boser to fill the open elected seat. Commissioner Judith Anderson is selected park district board chair. iii r h 1 � 1 Legislation is introduced in the Minnesota Legislature to remove the Hennepin County board's power to appoint members to the park district board and to establish a seven- member elected Suburban Hennepin Regional Park. District board of commissioners. The legislation would al remove the Hennepin County board's authority to review and veto park district budgets as formulated by the park district board. • 1 7 7 -FING� PAPER- { mio' 1Ti ", Pal i r.; d IA ;ti: .. o A 1' ! k; 1 99) iced 4; { _ j s � ,�,, r'4 +? +..al Gu�tit fIS� +.'tl t Opy, Ede 3 t t'< L2 .T`t't11 t apT fYJ +� " , now, t.Clrit4'ti1 " fat. A,. :rk1 Y'y F r � V iv M 1 ILIW j F rF Flat V �G�ft t' H u ' B61 I 1 U rr,.m C f 4 ^Y.)11'atllkl r+ .l �l ICS! „k, Poo P id and Wrf tv At h Alma's ATts Chats 24 S'1;py jn Watet chafpSa � Sit+ in water Mt'kar moat Rent.ji 24 Sliph in Water i 8 Bt tt Storf2d on Land UklHA,f dt? Wit 3/111 Illy 4 ?Owf _ F1t 11.:,4q 35 V1krra islti' fil# qt 11 wPAYO C►if13c " 7y - ASJtlti2. l* 40 1PI I (IN AC 1tNt� MU' EA 4V AT Ofty, I QA ; 4•�'r.s.Y1 FIk. ?tm s 3[� "61+fY(w41 1011 7M 00, 31 404 3 /1V 1 ,+a ^. 11 ;' 1, Er 7 1 °71 +'x510 :e,�Q- 1Pt -C 1€13 19P1x24 31 4•`? 12t91 -cf, 1016 96l.5 31+1 ,Ii l "ll !N�l��ft" ff , �'k�`1#. •f.l� �1� .�4 3S #• 3ik21 ' ANY " 3 , i F .��/q{ uw �y �3 1'111€ i 31'111 . £. ld1 i t }IU4 1 11 V n '_ FN4' pY1Y fi sti FY1.1trG Rt-'TI"£LE -74 Vj* 214170 `4 3f1� 31 311 1 5,50 ; Jet - 1 ' 1414 5.50 31181 .,�11 ='l�� WAY ylAtA VFWXJF tMA, 5.54 1s?f?1�PE PA1i1 7,7017.31 7,70.31 SIF '17Ff 5 w -a 01 7��0{►4p" 1010 27+30,31, 31456 3107,11 Z7.46 SY3- SFVF;Cx 41 °i +t "•Cw 311`+ 91 3/1+;" 1 27.46 W•0' 1010 27,46 31473 3/17/9! 60.06 f1FA SMS Tres 73- 7 °4400 W.49 "FEB SA ES TAX T1 °02 +'1440 3r19I 1 3f1' > " }1; 5,113,57 .J1iFt- 1010 5713.31 31 483 3/14/9 r il�ri13�;1�4kP F4 1 0 Vtw)p , vTAL el,4 A . tf1 :3` fsf PP((S t,`�'a.�at} MiiF' ithTat. 01-2W - 0)0 2.44 ' W. WNIFAL RE f1�f1. 41 41 1514 45.1 1163 DFNT t{F? t1 E 01-4likl °1510 45,bO 'MAR PENTAt iETIKF 01-4144 -1510 Q.vj pU'w' DFNTA1'€+E'1 FEE 7Y-71DO -1510 - ED 1010. 171:.70 31470 3/0, pE.i.t,A 4fN'of 14 kl* fOTAi 171_ 10 E1'419 iF+h PA! I? aw,no' 1,1Q �1 71n y514 ;t 3f MII 71 71uG X44 9 [MI5( 7•iof 1 3' ° "1 1,2'.N 31 iNft-C3 2f�14 17d�.�1 314`1 3f45191 F� -PAID 1 i ?<k.?8 L.0 71-71 133,!0 YNE r�C Ed t H A D A "f Tilt 11. »2 #. cr 1"R. °PA A:�1fwW1: I A Atti V 9.114R AMl7MT D Ck 4 DATt 3/121b1 F :ktr 7t 7111(1 ° #� qa1 x.f "404+ °t1 t4 ,' ,t`.`r1� 11z"ht d�u tC3Q t4`r,tk7' 3144 ?� /91 „ 'ra.: 1010 10,75. 0 31461 3,�4T/ 1 wtt' 44,I1 3i44b 3F01PQ# T4 11 1E► 4 i #fit 4 1 , ht9P�,, 1t f °F? t, tlid 71 2At ? 1410 2 31444 316/91 , 1 t r�11= l,fit 1, 35 G. 71 Tt3 °r10 .'�i.f1�J MAtE 7 1 "7104 -�`�� w GIB 7t 7tt -5`rb4 1Q.ttt F79f 71•1100- 36.45 MCA '1 711X1-9'540 3; 19 `91 311 ,4 , "`!t 3,?'i x lit °c 1010 ' 3D4.97 ROO 3119191 wtk 4 u - *w vE1+CP to f a. t .4" t4lj f;t; {WI 3/17 +i 5,4!w JAN tGr 1r ?13` i'.4 314 ' {01/9 yF�fi x1r.ktii�41 „a>ji kr.4y + <tNttlF 1?,?{ ” �.i:a r'K'FtTI 1 4'), 44 17 ;Ii €'f ,44 M.-Cl! i ?'#ti `x'0,44 31460 3'N/91 1CM ;tltwt4y` 1 «:• 4', -A1M, ', 'r.1, #.71fi 0 ,1 t,1 ,�ft t , 3 tfy3. ° 3145 YOM t tx SR 411�-Vll4' r:��i+ 4C'1 AWIF 4 A 0 ': WE t�11' 1 r` 171 CttM TIME: "PAA {iA4Cy��++--. .,' .. ti(M.R WWl . CK'4 s:m1F E. FA,W ° v 169.00 t0 3/001 nict�l Y"4�t 'iir1:`• :?.?% S !•DFiT�;wCf �.� (� 4`� �° � z• 1 5.42 3144 ,334591 4.X K.rlt 1910" 134.W, 314%, �t1�x 1 4A i ix ,t.�`•� ,.�� y;,;`. a. '`,�. ! ?�� 71-7144 -x+14 71- 7 loo .wp .'Pl. * 1414 162 31 454 fr - �<•� €�;,? 3:."�3 1.�1 717144 -x514 ,. 4 � a s <''`� >�� ;��'x1 t,1;t�..?x? .4+trC.-CI� 11310' 1140.90 31x78 3f121 !i Fi f k PA11t 1i8. t1Q 71 - 7100 - 9514 1,:74.15 NINE 71'71tA�a552b 56. DI 71 -71t �9 +4 - �I4iP� +1 �l!'3i�T ',415.�< •s�ai° -CTi 1(114 3# ;5.$2 31�t91 311�f�y �+lu f 0up w 1lN10 TIITAL 6153.71 t,3 I FftE RAtII 3/1 31 44 06 44.41 I,IN1aJN 3/rl PR 41 -2044 444Q .. 1 Yl4.•CD 1414 4400 *69" 3 04 0044 °i ML NI I WR %R# ANIM WTAL 44,N Lw PRE PAID 40,41' A KCEPIIDN -MSH D,C 4r {�i2[? 4124 3/19'91 , 11'' 4 1 1 1 40,E JR$t_ j 1 44.00 31444 3/01 /0 }'�Al4k OF IN Cl'rIfs VEN1W TOTAL 40,t;f1' 1279 FRl pA1D i5. 3' 4.0k i l "tp1! FEE 41° 0 -440tt l/1 :15.44 0t 42 1414 2 31474 311 �f91 fiot1 M m Uk`t1t1F MIAL '5. C4 K X51 Fi?f PAI 1: , !:4.56 FIT 31 PR 41 -2W -4x144 4y 7 I 5x19 /91 12,1?8.56 JW -CD 1410 1. 12P,56 31455 314717?1 Tit PAID 102,!,$ FIT -SEYR ?3 41 2 f4 w 3! 1 1 3/1 1�2.6P .ot -Cft 1014 ' 1Q.4 31472 3t 12f91 +ri Alk13l'E+N ' POK VENI'm'TOTAL 1r,31.x4 l!ar�4 41 PAID 147.16 !'ED CNIR UED 3 PQ, 01- W(p 3',9x" 1 3t,` i 147, 1f 3:14-CD 1010 147.16 314157 3/07/91 -! .11 17NT1N 4' AL N p! AN ONC# i0lk 11 N A t ' 3114 /92 . X GlJ t 4 o€xt#61 PgTC1 Ct�t� OAr tkO l H ION ACCptX4T N,PKR t { 1 11884 U40 i'R°'4"`4 �1'i ' � 4 � t M ify1T`F j iF'li��" •fry • 1!'YgS✓�A I1 f � b'{.'F y' }�1 a P,r .,4 1 "€w S Pt+ 7z1� u, �,�t�,t t�4.��i ,1RN, °CO 1010 lrS4. 31462 3/67/41 �i € y,yy ', � - 1 •.�'' ,>P ,P�1=f�2 a }� ,�#. °C';1 � f010 ts443.65 '3146N'3;11 � ' s i t t T t I;k }. a+ 7LXOP NAL 64 1 1 1/.97 PEP! EN POS!G METER, 01- 407 -3210 jj M'LEN RGTG METE11' �}!- 4�?0 - 321C 11 .47 P1.EN POS G METIER 01 -4 t - '10 t 2.;6 Ti^EPL,EN F'O51'G. METER s 111- 4040 -3210 70. t3 RIE E'l E'N PIISTG t8 01.4040 -3w }t4 6.66 WK,fh PO5T METER 22- 4170°3210 9.83 REN POSTG lm fl7140 35.Q9 RET'1.E POSTE METEk 0l- 4340.3230 10.83 REPLEN POST1i METER 81 - 435Qw 10 65.96 KPL.EN Pt15TG METER.Qi- 4194x3210 ;2.94 RtPLEN POSTE METER 73- 7380 -V10 32.95 REFlEMi POSTE METER 78 <7800 -3210 44.16 REPLEN FOSTG METER 01- 4140 -3210 1.43 fEwtEH R1k5T6 METER 01 42£1 -3210 3.13 REPUN P9516 METE 1a�427� -3210 1 6.E REPL.EN POSTE METER 01W4090 -321 1t.77 OFOA P%TG 01.1190.013 0 I 4.06 CITY DAYS POSTE OIA196-40O0 11.31 TOPtSr"TERS POSTE 0f- 1140 - OM 114.78 WLEk POSTG METER 01 -4320 -3210 3119191 3114141 600.00 SW -0 1010 600.00 31471 3108/41 ; FL6TM,c1 o VEW Tt1IAL W. Mrf PR1 °PAID 34,6.31.70 P YM43 -'90 LIFT STA IW OW 78.7M300 -5000 311 3/19191 34,631.70 JRPL-CD 1010 34631.70 31444 3/ 14/41 NF *.ST MMV,'lWl#1CAL, 1W. Vk.NnQR TOTAL 34631.70 M >395+1 Pfd PpiU 7,178.00 PEFtA 312 PR 01.2040 °0040 3/19191 3/19141 7,178.00 JOIL -CD 1010 7178.00 31457 3/07/41 P E R A VEKCP TOTAL 1178.00 p" PRE - FAIO 33.48 FUU-N P /C-R€SEWAS 01.2300.0224 3/19191 3/191 33.48 JRMI - CD 1 010 33.48 31485 3119141 P+ tY 1ASH VF' ND[1R TOTAL 33.48 Pr79 P%-PAID 242.00 FU MI DELIVERY 30- 6000-3100 ;T 1 ?4+d, :14N:4�` 1u1Al s " ;Z.00 ocl v A» 1l k37, 5� � C+FB 3,•'2 Pti 01 �.'0+W t>til4ii ,.,.` J4, C D ' taia 437,50 3t a t 1 4 a �' �;; 47:St�1 ►�adt'#FfP-L fAF t tjT 41'rd316 :Y 1 u1 CD rota #,sa 314 ,00 ` W MEDICARE SLFF -N *AFT � Ott 4410 >tStQ r iF9yz r ►t �mo 4 +d+tt�1 t'4�[i'IxSi� �,0;��.3? r , L113 fit'!t{1a'9Jta AINE 46 »4 ?- ttiBC >;.I 3.;14»1 2 ,50 , - -n , �, -'Co 1016 2517.20 31 n 41.3 , Lr� 7t= �d =�rta a 4 wr�E 7t . 7t0a p52a 14.54 -' pry 7t- 7ta4�56p „ ,. ? r9'91 3ti'�/91 .22 alt -00 . 4016 903 32 31 �t1 PRE PAd[' » 1,183 14'Lda 7t -71W -9544 44x.1+? NINE 78.81- D ISC 71-71aC) -9520 fr 17.45 , Mr7 71 7it1�0-4540 ?'t�,�1 3t14 /vl 1,667.38 I,F?wl CD rata ib67,36- a 1� =n, 01w1117 01% b 9'EN1tS V'FNDtJR TOTAL 500 813 E> 54511 r - 0410 .92 ' CR LNION 372 PR Ot -2040-0000 . 3/4 ti1�, %�i 508.92 Lm. CD 1010 509.92 34464 $ /�7J"R� 4rp1E r.APIfi>t M Ill f IINIth `7tt IV TOTAL 5441.92 taTO K1.- P410' 58.87 'FEE; T01E1.S 01-4E9a -2250 115.16 FEB RIMS 73- 73DO -220 118.62 'FEB I.411F OW F07 01- 4290 -2240 23.77 FEB tJNrFt1RM REt(T 01-4290 -2240 6C V "FEB WNIF0W RENT 73-7300 -2244 60.E3 _FEB UNIFO" RENT 78-7$00-2240 6.84 FEB PAM ?24170 -2200 243.60 FEB RLGS -C HALL 01- 4320.1240 7;14ta1 t , 1 �, yr &M.07 JK -CD: 1010 686.67 31476 3!12141 wfic ;*Nin �*of,m �"ft* lork 6F6.07 rr PRE va f U 1, 266.55 - BAl OLIE • BL I MM 3a -4100 'aatCL /141 1.2Fb,�e Ctt 1410 1266.55 31445 3/05141' v1►'14 F1iT11fNf v VE01 )R TOTAL 1266.55 x ow UNCRASE a0 u AMA L PATE b t4pi; 137 MOT W=l rdFt 11.24. w;re� 'a, P ;( .Of cX�.<�N .N�,� AMkA!if .T#EX 1 DATE k �`+�*. ;�4 r'�:r� �'. y': �E�:'AHC"E " °E�TK � F�tii�� "`?�1;'�•1tdt� 1010 9 M. 00 314M:3ti9/9i to o C�i Tf c e 'tt7'`3¢.. t =j5 'ap 460 vw .,:, •r -'�E. '161 '�19t'i��,. i :�E. „" ,r x ow k k.. C • K A t. [A ! X 1191 . ,.« pf`.lUMT 4' 2ER VONT ' Lx # OaTE 01- 4090.3130 71-7100 °3130 ,r „kk Iv 1 ALI!11 73 7,#'t0 31317 Arno 1 T 76.79W {130 J-4 cl� 1010 w.,, FI [/F Ike SIJPPI. 01.4040.2100 Pt OFFICF 3M' 02 44 0 11 =90 T .3I Tt? r°FICE SL"t 01 -4140- I00 9? OFF 11,3r gFF', Cl 4190 1I00 =E1. 41 ICE 01 01-4340 -2100 4 . 4 14 FEB OFFICE 9 lPL ' 01 4290' «100 4.15 F E f CJF F ICE SkW 71 7100-2100 4.49 FU OFT I CE Stf'f'1. 73-7300- 2100 4,4'7 FEY OFF ILI 9E'AL 78- 7W-2100 ' 14,2V TFIESA(MIS 01.410.4170 41.40 CTlPJTfR PArnkR 01 40 -.100 17.79 PUP' ;Ot.InS 22-4170.2100 i5`t,42 Jf4 t0 1010 4WN0 TWA. 4 5N,41 72.30 -VEH IRV MS 01-4290 -2700 . 311"Q1 3/ 72.30 '.M?NL -CD 1010 AFT m fx* "K M R1pMp VENOOP TIOIAL 72.30 T ; +1 '30.0+1 APR PAWING lEA5E 01-4290-4200 30.00 APP PAWING LEASE 73-7300 -4200 30.00 APR PAWING LEASE 79. 7900.4200 ' 3 1 / 3r"1191 0 0.00 'Pt Co 2010 O.RtIA M ?)WAN1.4 ") - 0(N VF.N11142 TOTAL "Jo 20.70 FPArE 01- 4140 -4100 107.10 141G FOOD 01- 4140-4100 3/21191 3121191 127.90 JRNL -CD 1010 4N `PIW IN S"* WNIMO TOTAL 177.Fs) PEE CDKRC RECICLE SFRV 70- 4270 -4200 3121 191 3121 /91 504.95 JRF4, -CD 1010 i* 14f VQ IN; STSTf* OF h VENOM TOTAL 546.95 4 0??% 78. FEB GASCUNE 72-4170-2210 ".=':.24 FEB GASOLINE 22-4170-Z210 W101 31211 131A -MC-CP 101b 1tTrrG FOOL,, INC. VEM TOTAL 131.96 /a 3 i- 879,00 SAI.T-23.4T 01-M-2340 3171191 3111191 879.00 JN* -CD 1010 71 Z - 7 Z 3 • 1x 1 49 "1) F 1 7:�r p 4 np Flo 01-4,V-3100 ol _4290-Moo 73-7300-3100 78- 7ND-Moo 1010 01. 4140-4110 1010 • 'o wl F F`W PA 10 0* cr A- 4"t)IN AMMI W4 # dWIE K 44 a7? 4 4 + ? - 4 CC) 5(q) op V W P I - C"Ot 3* ct"l I N' if. z4 7;0 600c - W10 01 ° 4140 -3; 3 ? W OW If 11 P14V* 01 4190 - M10 TRIINU 0 1 - 40YO 44 W.Q 1 FN 4r'vf J1. - 3<"0 I m mow o 1. 460.. Ci," Mt ` fREP1 4'j.8! 144, 4w) P%W T PVJF TP f is- 1 4."'A %4 1f EpiIot r. . /'A , 'i21 ?, 21114R Fft _CD Ipip % WA 4?, C1104 7 FUVP tivvs 01-020-2." 7 1010 (YfqlNl [If Oil(' '0", t c i4slop lwk kv cd,p, blp OFPj-,j IfEOTF I 'If I I O,ljfl�j I 1 1 7 . 1F tow!) l Ar F l TPT4j 1x 1 49 "1) F 1 7:�r p 4 np Flo 01-4,V-3100 ol _4290-Moo 73-7300-3100 78- 7ND-Moo 1010 01. 4140-4110 1010 • s r I`,�a p s ,ttl�NaAE i ? T /"A iYT 4 nIMli 4 T.►k' 14.l.. 5F1 t}k w+ M`lo 411: f 6 AM ON' 1M,�%04I' Ailt'llN, 4NO dP>(IAT (Afl 1 WiTI 4 ➢. 1'i jA{ } � arXk 41,Y) 1 v, )C , ,:FN F10 1010" 01 4:Xi : 6 �X: ' } 1 „(XXI"X) iW llf C' 1114, E'liltII4 73.7vo-42 Woo u19.10 K-PAIR aulOf WSY -F3`o 01.4:'30-3510 " k ` "1 '7.1'0 144 ±y'Fj 1G10 (ay 1,1M, "kKiii V NI(P TOTAL 67 13, 1 41 71.50 FfP 71# W. SFWYC 73.7300.4'. 3/21191 3/21/91 77,50 .JF!4. z.11 1017 [a>F"FiCW STAlf } 4'E``(;A i, 1NC 'JT;NIC3i TOTAL 77;50 G1g)o 1,014.00 CiS INSTR tElff.L0P 01.4140 -4110 31 ?llgl 3 :11�a1 !,014.00 ,X?t# -cr, 1010 W TRAINING, SMICIS VfNXIP TOTAL 1014.0 wil>32 50.00 tk"`,iSkT- jf%COW-Ll"[1 )1 °4140.4116 50.90 ftl1.° 1' 1W 14'.!' i VIN l ltk 'AWN IOA `0.,.X1 R )80 94.1` Wi; !FA,STM Ol 31 ?11' 1 11, 94.15 tr+fd. {:I1 1010 4f'f •t MACffI►k %CF 1KNXP TOTAL 94.15 734. ±7 KF ".' COFI, F1;A, 01 4070 3i ?1191 2!?lr' 1 ?'A.61 ,1Rf1 °Ch IUI=) 4W 111 (UPT Of f T VENT(* VAL 734.67 5,41 F F FVE Yrlf SE 7C- 4�;r -4N , 5.411 F't CD iClf� MJT',- SFAVItTS, INC. VFNi4F TOTAL 5471.40 I ;-A() .)I-4r T4k`5`9fli i f; !Itv s r ,Rf 1Ni 4 r14k, �IkFRi' "fit; "1' tIGTk 4 tf} Al +sif i!F, h:f i 4. '. +1t f ' � M - "� r, ., x� i . w �.� w ':,. "t 1 •f„ vVo 14 , .JV) MY N NF f Y 2 MA N n � . ,y(�. �j/y. 'J1 T'1'.1 '.i: `.N '4rf C�) FED E N14? 5'tr`R1SI 01-41 FE H F 43P IAM PK VV I' f of - 3'W- 09tf,; -: A) FEB F;NIw -I F' G*761 30.6000.544(+ c ? 'FEY E .Cttr AL. AFita•i :*- 6W-5000 a N';, 00 FF5 a%P -t1�'i S7k iMf fa "' 79 7Fr30.5400 vE.00 FF-a fk% —Its' I M T 01-41 t'(1 1 1 FEE ENGR'FCIG ili 317 H1,',* 01- 41W Y', 00 Vrb E,Mf"P� -oT Ei OFFi 01 -3100 fi2.!xt FEg E?4�t�PGf�J` ikF[ 01.4341;- �1!�(1 1 `�.�r? FE5 E�f� -W;; DEP; 73 - 7304 - 3144 4E. 00 FEE F%R -M,'5 (EPi 7E 7804-3160 lily) FEB MR-DEPOT Rf1O 30.&.W-5Q+X0 M. x) FEB �NGP - (AS Irv#: CiW1 114 30 - � - 3100 1 FEB DO 11111013 81 .6°5700-3100 FE$ fWiAl 116A 26.5700-3100 JP?t Cl 1010 'lA�iAf'fs9 SlT+ ��I1 zM1 H�1�f M. f 'llil'ff i.' ItA K f?34 0 .'•]!i 1, 1' ". �.� 04 COO - 1 1 1!X! 4P. t0 .04 -00 1010 NW xf VE:"f XT T"tAl. 4 IN) 3, 4,' FE8 itS 01 4� 37,10 ' i FEE C1vS 7:; I f W20 .L `41 7t'J•'17;kj 1.'1.1 Pip W; 7;06 4 , _','t)(, bI I rrjf, A.:Ali`. 4INA:! rmIN' U iY 1 bATf } d i 41 SIr 1 3- 7 3710 n} -4 Sr 4; y,' 3i3N7 N -. • • .. r S (i. 4 k w 4 l q.P w THWAL''A y 'Sr',''{ k4;if: ft� +d 'tii if VINx "jw, 1'N T ; PifA it WJ EItPIFMN" WU AN!(i Nd 3 11Ja: " +; %l.'• ^: I'd f ""i bI I rrjf, A.:Ali`. 4INA:! rmIN' U iY 1 bATf } d i 41 SIr 1 3- 7 3710 n} -4 Sr 4; y,' 3i3N7 bI I rrjf, PAr4 Dfc ti m8 w y '. i x lykl` .1 „x;r ;.iM1 4 :1 mril i rfWAIfl 1�fEY # QArE a4� ��a tarok ;Y,1 " >: IN 4 FWN i 1f �,Aw Win �i4�;t , f.ftili.'� 4 FE$ ��A��;w1tf 41.4144- ,r1p 41 2'3.14 Ek TEP1 ; 41 °4194 - 1.734 *at.;Y..t ".' €11.4i% -2210 fE.F GA "Il14 73-7344-2210 � s`, ff E`yJQ faE'1, 11 3; 1 "t1 "it; l:' P4 471 1010 SLPfP.rS14f±1CA VENRIP TGTAI ;NlI.'?i T4116 119.x 'Em +4"P 74..4,'74 -1'474 3t11i'91 3 11 Pt 'r", 1010 WtIlp*IfS TO GO VENWR rriTAl. 11'',11 T4961 .`140'.93 F R TEAS 0147: :200 3121/91 3/211`+1 V03 ,m -rl� 1014 rWIV CITY FILTER SERVICE 1 VENIt,R IOTA[ 341ri,9? V 190 1,�':��,1�a CI °IiT 4n ;3F 16 -° 7 1 X FEF PLAN €'fleli t 41-41,'K ^-31 + 31Fi1 31,1'1/91 t,979,d 1'+44-CD V10 ViM 04%-HA7APD- STAtLINGS VE L1(1i TO 1979.44 145430 444,91 GATE ,V4 T 1 4, r 1 3r1191 3/21191 400,91 M.-Ci 1�1. • � �r J. t r lit INhi, 411E 14 pn�Fr • ti r'de?rdl iti d;ktfs- l�'J!� ¢ 6 ' :'4. i!° e _ '4i 01 4 ,. ?b00 Sl. {rllj .i�"''r� r V'.'N , vK4 FF ':r;,. •. Y' .7 'F.44 n[1 tEy r .t�i; ;e. ` ",l'it4 '. 1 01.4 4100 4V IN MFG illy r M., "s`'eI !ANl. F 4 1r'k Mlk N! • � �r a r1 fT A k�,r N I I I(" �r , ;tfi i fi'+ tvi;' �[ i''r l4 ftEJf k l t t ! f1tlNtt 1 ?('..K'I A 1.'I 4 (! "•iMf.F1t,E� Iv it 4 if P 10 #14-11' 1x.24 r`tv ?irr,b`i tit ft� t,it'y «f L_:? ri4: "'i i t t�tJIvt.'It -rs 14I Maywood It1t "• +��:Iv /$ { ` ( 11 to corl'$iClf,'T the i5 !`ticirli e of 9 + i7rrt.3} r:^! °.ii :. J.Et +M iT„ t i I ()W a t5i)s.i t.of"du tir)q r.'dar•it r, -> I r) t1)e B- I lf�siit.rr. - l) t'�i1`ati >.y (; la. - t li - .yr �•(. .�1' l�$r'I 4.1'}liSfr'h ?r'CN L tvo IIy AI t j}V >t ^irrjwa ^il' +L; >Y•.sr ir' €� °� it �, 3 +�1 l�r' "fN_IrM1t; Hllttl r f o I:o ttYe c`bove W I I t)!' s Vi'r'i f f,r• •>r;t+ ,t Y: lltr A 1., '1 f iy ; )F ttE ",',r (1 f'it t ti 1 "; frf, "i'l Ak F r r : e r c. C ;I;irk, City C:lerk f'i t) I i 1� IetCj rrt „ I t E' C .31 f '" 4 r ` +: r F c l:�t;i i ',hor'j) m�jI I e (I to Syr(; {.,Or'ty 041wrr� witt)tr°i 0) (j 4 1 t t 9, (A I" b 50_0, 1;'0 UW , W j, 1 1 t i , , Un i 3/11/91 • 0 I.AKC, 0:4 COMMIMIS By, 1C A rJ I%dvA lk�i IV, "Oql PHZI jW'P ml WA )WO, I hind.) H 11.1 Olin i"! Tly clymnol :war` lKagle RIO f -A low t y proid b I t ing dwil Pr bom w"qV' of Depot docks au t it I'm 0 . 3, 01 1 i A-M 1 K: A .'rE.'�+, .!(`ji:I i tt appri_aval D"n !Itvit"Al ional Boat Works 912W'41, li;Aline toornailwilt 9 5 1 11 ("nWA hot O'l Race Alrodul 0 ( Im"IM r .-v ioqq W1 Lit kp q0"vir" i i i I i t, o I i k, i Cr o sir i n g In I P 1 % w 1 1 i n ( q x n a 1 11 m v it A 1 q t, T i I I I I t , ' I I k e.1 B a!; "; C I t I h f I f. I I I v �"' tr I I r I i;l flit - I i ( f'; 8 r' () Amor an !;Oml at 06 p Frmimht imi bA" ; wit nmism; h: I M 91 9 4 PottoatiliVildar Am Jim ippirmal of Wd raquil n for IM Sinmwr AW 140,1 icat Am wit tho k; iv" t It( I-OL, ojwl.'oVl 0. 5 Progrn,s I vInot f torn Vic" Qair NO ur nn Wn, r I'a I ( I P t regard i III X.N Pv I ! ni,i I Wi, t or-( I '1 4 , 1, it i I1 f (ir a! A ! 6 . MN DNR I" "pond owwNp"o 4 1u t h- low? .ant VO -r _h a ! o t y 1 , ihn -- I nfm ml buta I Unly 7, MN DNR pinjmqml why im of H, ruh, r""Q now IV a i"n ign for I ish a"d W i l d l i f e I I 1 4 , 1 1 a l 1 1 1 i I IM, in jutod "t 1-vwon•-(W, wit 11 VOT at lent inal 10 mmm' fish - int"i'lli;il i''nal Wa v 1: Pa i r4 I I ro po I Amni t I P,por I i! ;1 I B Pvhl i I i i " r I I riq 9, (A I" b 50_0, 1;'0 UW , W j, 1 1 t i , , Un i 3/11/91 • 0 C7 poi 1 7 C7 poi : , r , , , :F MIDI—iND REF±'( ;RT x�`tNL +ITt_iF :E_: 16. r37ry F t: BF`:IJARY YTC+ PER ,ENT F'Ef'3.E EXPENSE VAR I#'NGE EXPENDED 1 ..._+ . 2831 151 46107 2 4.78% 4k,FS k' i 25 25 1355 1.81% ., 1 . 1 ` °�i "r 1 923 X946 138584 14.21% ;} 1 102. 482 18.17 !32 44 44560 1 ` 1 . }4 140.+61 _ rt5�� 147455 ' 1 __ .'79% ;t }t {' 5 106 6776 21 4 0 % 7 r 5 11695 t .255 151. 20% j� 1 _ % 1 � ! �`_ 1 � 1 1 1 1 1._' 15347 '.8 14.90% ! s r ! Ldp +t r, 1 76 7C ►,�% ; • r; r , t rr, 1 r t, . ' i >; 1, c. ( }. „,1 1 W :7C!? 1095 1 1 . 12 tr.t s ia.33 �J13'3 <.} '•31 �03648 12'/. ;44`5 4 "v.l 11,° :: `i4 51 ;,3 94. 7976:3 14.). 58% 1 , 1 `.; 4 154;' =+ 1j7231 10J. 117 (1 1176 0.00 .4(n )E. }(,) 45).7 457 -rtid4 1.14% 6 1i}6'';::' 2 127 6 _6 2, : : :'4 i't.7,l. LiAJ !_ .'° . :.� a 1775 15 2 2 3;r 1 4S",: ' 14..26!. 2 70 4000 1754' = 1)x.5/ 1 7 l.s', 1 :, / , _ t _' =i'=! 1 "s7861 1 .7r % + t 44_ _ _' °'4' 7 , ' 1S. = 1% 4 :> 1 ' ' 1 . 1 75 7 17: 14.44 ". x'477 7467 -3 1 1.::6% t f ; F 1(,i: 41 _ :0 04 18 ,! 3_ ' 41 20.07/. MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE WN-IND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION March 11, 1991 were: Commissioners Bit I Meyer, Chair; Bt 11 Thal hw' FrJr)k Wei land; Michael Muel ler; 81 1 1 Voss; and M,irk hcinu%, Jean 5wther land, But Iding Off icial ; and Ed Shukle, ! ,, Ar) and excused was Commissioner Geoff Michael (. i ty Counc i I Representat I ve. C,;i t i zf.±r)s were I n attendance: Jeff and Roxanne G�)Yle Thamton. (,.h-0r Meyer ('�') 10 0 the regular meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. I NU 1;, 25, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes were Presented ar) additions. W)DION made by Clapsaddle seconded by Mueller, to ap- Prove the Februacy 25, 1991 Planning COMM Ission Minutes Ps written. Motion carried unanimously. Brent Gayle A 6343 EL@Yrldc3e Road. W. of Lots I a 2, Block 2., Say Ridge, PIQ #23- 1 -- 2d 33 00 9 YA IMAQ VATE STREET FRONTAGE. Building Official, Jon Sutherland, explained that the subject property does not abut a Public street. Zoning Code Section 23.408, Subd. 8 states no building permit shall be issued for any lot or parcel which does not abut a dedicated Public street. fie also reviewed the setback variance required to the west side property line of .4 feet. Staff recommended approval of the variance request as the Propo5ed addition will enhance and allow reasonable use of the prooerty, subject to the fo) lowing conditions: 1. • The proposed garage addition Is not shown on the survey, It may require a slight variance t the west side. The ap- plicant must provide this Information on the survey. The applicant Supply the City with a COPY Of the easement to Bayridge Road and this would be reviewed by the City En•- gineer and City Attorney with the applicant responsible for any additional fees In excess of the variance review fee. We quest the l ocation of the sewer and water li nes. The Placement of the proposed attached garage was discussed. Mueller expressed a concern with turn space. It was determined the turn space is not Ideal. but adequate for the applicants needs. Mueller also expressed a concern with drainage onto the adjoining lot to the west, the grade drops ap--. proximately 5 to 7 feet. Staff agreed this issue needs to be addressed, and could be addressed within the context of the variance. Mueller questioned the hardship. i on M i flutes - M0 l I ON twi ie by Voss . seconded by C I apsadd I e to approve �I t s i t f r 0 C xrrrrWprat on for approval I n c l u d i n g cond i t l ons In addition, staff is to use a resources :lw•,ri lob le to ensure that proper drainage is maintained at, the we side of the improvement. lotion icarr red 6, t. N) s €: I n favor were C 1 apsadd 1 e, Thal, Meyer,' VO-, S , We land, C 1 apsaidd 1 e, and Nanus; those opposed ware: Mueller. ' i <it ed hi reason for opposing being that - adequate and a need for an extra doubl Car garage w i I 1 he freard by the City Council on March 26, 1991:. ?sF, No. 91- OUS Jefff Roxanne R i tenour. 5656 E3ertle�t 8tvc1. I oc; k , 9 �. i �t ..:1, i to _ j -6 1 _ . MoUUnd 8a Part'k VAi� ANC TO : A NON ONi` CONFORM PROPER TY AND A VAR AAWT OF MA! T Q - T Ni 3 p FRONT YARD 5E TOACK FOR THE A t T� ON S Ale J�7' TAC1* 0 GARAGE , t .t Ear,1 1 c i nq off i c i a l. Jean Suther i end, rev i ewed the status of this pr<>iaFSr ty. The ex i st i rrc principal structure is setback 1 1.5 feet ; fr`orn the front property line, the required setback is 30 feet'. In addition, the lowest floor is 1.95 feet below the minimum lowest floor elevation al by City Code Section 300:15, 5ubd. ` 9a., which requires a minimum building elevation of not less than 933.5 feet on any lots ri pari an to Lake Minnetonka. The exist lowest floor elevation is 931.55. It is Staff's position that the ba3 event Is possibly subject to secondary flooding by under- ground water travel and that the freeboard or safety margin is not adequate from the ' 100 year flood level to the basement floor. Staff recommended, that in the event the Plann Commi ssion or Ci Council would approve of this vari staff w oul d request the submittal of a "hol harmless" statement from the appl to the City as approved by the city attorney, and that thi variance would he subject to the additional requirements listed below; 1. The entire rim ,joist sill piate area be exposed for proper inspection and any areas found to be in poor condition be replaced with material approved by the current building code. 2. The existing wall cavities be properly filled with approved insulatr.,n as best as can be reasonably accomplished. 3. A heat IOss calculation by a qualified mechanical contractor be sut_xn i tted to ver i f the furnace I nsta 1 t ed or to be 1 n - stalled, is properly sized. 1VO? P I alin i f Ct ywui i > (t M i I it j 4. 1 j 15 t'+ t t . I v r f? r t ti i t he j if st , n vil t C qj I t r) fit t t Y (fd arld C . 'h,jr11 Ca 1 C. c 'I i tic C I t) r t" (7 0 r (I `ar M I tay t Ij j I Q t i: ot.1t t, fte rte r., I y j n( I ins , r I I I. t nt ' l i r"'I � t t ), A t Jt rr+ottitf be ian-e with cijrr ttrit od e 3s re(4U i red by t t i e bu i I (I i c i i. A I %o -Fkj( qc!st t-1,) t t f j i? 4 t I • -, , , )r)CI I t I on r t) ex I t j nq ccnt r ., -112 1 riches t h i Ck rK) v (I not SOUrld or 3� and r ep Is aced and I t wou 1 d !: r a dra I nt Ile system. "UmP bvi and PuMP be 1 n5 ta I ed Applicant, Jeff Ritenour, exr) I a I net:j t- i <j s I t uat I or) and i ntent i ons to the comm I cis 1 on, he W1,U I d I i tc, c I io,jri - Up the house and make I t I I vab I e. VOSS questioned the Building Off icial If he was C001fortable with the construction Condition. The Buildinq Cif ficiejl commented on the construction of the StrUCtUr(j to the conditions listed ir, his report (above) . The location of the propoiqed att,:jctjt?jf was diSCU5recf. Thia I commented hat the appl icar.,r ha I � 3t,,jtetj to him that he Would agree to place the P rat' �-qe 10 fe(=t f ur trier b k than what original prcposed. Muel ler commented on the c(- ) r e r f , the house. , n = :, i v a n a rid t he cord I t, ion of MOTION made by Vess, seconded by Mueller to deny the variance request. The app 1 1 cant handed out a copy of 1: fie ar t I c I e f rom " "he Laker re I at I nq to the C I ty Counc i I action on t, fie recent cia,;e on Avocet Lane. Voss commented that the City Counci I net, to rn forward on a Trutt) In Housing Ordinance. The Building Official reviewed Section 300: IS 9a rei,:jtino to ttie floor elevation. Cliapsaddle commentF-4d that the parcel 1 5 a bui I dab le t of property, it has plenty of lot areo, F I 1 4 M j flut cc, K 'o 0 4 A1 r f o—, t fi, it t r)C! hou S e Cou I d be adequate I y improved, but C 10 )of,'t lon 300: IS 9a relating to the f loor elevation iiji imr)r to any structure lower than olevajt inn. Thai agrees with Mueller. V i'� i nt ent, tor the mot I on was to mot I vate the Council I tA) 11K)ve tor w,ir�j with a Truth in Housing Ordinance, because of the r)lar', the structure Is In such bad shape, the fact th'it the Structure elevation Is too low per C ty Code, potential I i ot - I I i t Y t, C ity. and the f act that the i s no s o l u t i o n for the to u -,e for these types of cases. h"i I c I ,; .i r I f - I (,-,, <! t h ,Fjt the comprehensive plan imp I I es that housing be improved. Mueller commented that r-jli the only way to promote such adequate hoes fng Is to enforce existing zoning and land use regulations and be wfilinq to work with developers as part of the planned residential approach. A house like this situation where it does r'(A mtet the current zoning codes. to improve it may not be the bo�.';t way to enforce the zoning and land use regulations. Motion carried 5 to 2. Those in favor of the denial weres Voss, Weiland, Mueller. Meyer, and Hanus. Thal and C I apsadd I e opposed. Clapsaddle commented on his reason for denial being there Is no basis for denial due to lack of a Truth In Housing Ordinance. Mueller is In favor of denial due to the fact the structure Is not in conformijoce with City Code Section 300:15 9a, ne does, however feel that the Property could be adequately improved. T h i s case w i l l be heard by the City Council on March 26,, 1991. _Comm fal qY I f Minnetonka. We i I and comment.- -d that he wou I d 1 1 ke to know I f the nunt'er of (locks slips hz-.ls increased from previous years. Meyer suggested that staff indicate on the applications if there is a change In the application from previous years. Pipproval of LMCD L cltjqr License for Al an No speci comments were made. w..e;�_ s��ss3.• t�. v��,�. - ,ecot)(led by Manus, to adjourn the .0 H; 0 p.m. KAt IOn Tar r° ied unanimously. Chair, B i 1 1 Meyer A • i A, M I Nt I I I '; (4 A Mi f I I N6 (* lift K)ONO AUV I 'A*? Y PARK & (WI N `&`A(J (A)MM I I)!, I (jN MA1,Wtj 1 4 , I �r I M oz j�4-r [)1T *.(>T Jim I tits o ,w. r t., i i , t i M I NU 1 W)lION rt%�jde by (: jFoy, '!('rcoridvd by Byrnes to appvc,)vfa the Parks & Open 'Srxj(t'e C'cXlvfii' sion Miroutes of Febr 14, 1991. Motion cejrric-d NATURE CONSERVATION AWAS: Checkl ist rf )ort frcgn stit.�cc)OTImittee. The skit)c t out tt.t or�iflr-d "Mc)Uri(j (Preen Space Survey" for the co(rvnissi(, r,,4j(,w. ")rtmiidt that she has a book describinc-1 djffc!r which she will rm-3ke copfe- ., f (�) r t I ( C( r '9 Lj 5, �- ( ' i� : , ;rr i b in g the surrounding land usf.. wi I i t)f,l ;.)r-ior-jtjzing the properties. 0 Schmidt cormnented that f irst- the are,j need t;r-) Surveyed, then the spaces can be pr I or j t 1 z (t(,j t t' i r v. j I ,.i ii , and then the p r i o r i t i z e d s m t visited or) t f)e <jrink,. i I t otir . It was determined that trio e t p I j -,fi =,f ij i tlie city owned propert i es ( I nc I ud i ng 222 sites) t)e ("'(10'i i](r-1 Wt-(5(l the commis- sioner as follows: Ahren I - 24 Byrnes 25 48 As I eson 49 72 B,j i I ey 7 ) 96 Anderson 97 121 Casey 122 146 Skogland 172 - 19) schm i dt 1 47 - 171 Weber I '� 1 a -- 2 ?,-' ')kl")qltjnd �,:k-jqqe that t<jking pirt,t .;,t thc- Parcels would be the beat: waY to utilize tl)e time: each site. It was determined tt)at the City wo+. film f+- the commis- sioners and the City would for V I _) of the pic- tur e5. Fack suggested that s I t) as they are I ess costly to develop. P j Ctjjre � () f �- 1 1 4,1 t "jrrft to be taken. The s I I des shou I d be numbered aCcoro i nq i i, ti the s i to number per the 1 1 st . S// 4 ifut ont ir"i imn- -r Ovr t r "? 1 C! a 1 i C WIN " It A! A AWA'i I M; 5 M, K q•W Lvvt if Unit ion for 1,IqUor liggpliq Aut Wir Qi"J 1'a. "t (q k ;v ! I t o I 'V) I . A" .'t r e' i (i ) f t.'i r c !, 4 � "; . I . I � I , I t, i, , ir:t M( of ing in February, A! 1 wvlio t:'! =! I W P v 1 � :- , 1 d on arintij I or i entat ion 1 1 v 1 t 1 4, 1 v A o"hir y Or f ehr Y. This rw hk c)wriot s in Mound. F'arth Day kjp-dstte laqpv h1qh1iqhti W n n on earth day which is "e�rf-1f:,i4jJ(!(:J for Ap! i I ("otjocl I Represor ive's ki'!* r t A t e f en reviewed t )er f , i r,.:W k 1 W : V - ' n t w f e t')r i-iary C i t y Counc J I Meet i rigs . C,Ity Manqqer pqrt There w I 11 be an opon tl,jl I on Apri I ", I , 1991 from I to 4 p.m. Parks 01i7e,pt Refx)rt Fackler reported on the stor"n of to -4 (fig M icati(vis and usable docks for 1991. The new qor v pa r1ya n and electi RaO work has been cunpl eted at W; 1"M qanvx = t he I s I tind , ind he is waft- - i ng f or quotes on tho ;;a i nt i nq of ttw tp. 1 a i rig. Fack I er a I so I riformed the Lona i ,4 i rai t tfic-y pro: e to place tne ol diving platf-: - )rmc - , ur) fi:,r h4i, Ihn ol tat foi.-, were once ki5ed at a few 5e I ected Warr . i . hn v ver , t W? / ht_—arw a hazard and a liability, and therefore ro/" not heon "5"d for years. The Commission expres�ii no opr"Wfinn for alictionirl off the plat- f orms . POTION made by Byrnes seconded by Andersen to adjourn the Parks & Open 5fw)ce C(""05sion Fleet ing at 8:59 P.M. Mat fon carried unanfrw3usly. 91A u C 213 i C 213 1 t I'f,c vk :'" was Lav01', Mc,t,ic >rr c irie d. Th., , Bk_x i ld irrg Cif f i—i 1 e�xpl rs irted thit the Platiiling Commission L �'e s;i tfliiir' rlt� e? t elr r? t� f' the * r i since reque_ s'-' d ue.' to l ac k o f h.irds lip and then pr•cal }o.;od garages would be too close to the garage b }trin�i it whit — e =ates all Unsafe condition. The Council this it < :tr1. They pointed ou that they applicant could c1t1,Wh0d this garage to the dwelling. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jessan to refer this item to Staff to prepare a resolution of denial. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1 Merry Pacholke asked that the City Council request that the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District not do any spraying for Mosquitoes by helicopter in the Mound area. She related her reasons for not wanting any sprayincl, i.e. sickness of herself and her animals, other animals in the neighborhood dying. The Council discussed Ms. complaint-,, the letters from the Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture, a letter from the University of Minnesota, and a letter from th— Me?tr(.)polit<3n Mo�;quito Control District. The letters from the MN. Dept. of Agriculture and the � MMCD stated that they have inve.3= ;ti.lated Ms. Pacholke's complaint regarding improper pesticide al pl ic:ations to I-ike Langdon and have determined that no pestic::ictn mistv;e has br,e n substantiated. The letters state that I3`I'l anci not. methoprerne was, applied. r MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jesnen to direct Staff to write a letter to they scientific Pear Review Panel asking them to research this problem and send a summary of their results to the City of Mound. Also asking the MMCD to have people on hand with Ms. P to monitor the spraying next year on Lake Langdon. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried., COMHk ;,NTB..._&..BUGG_Y,E3"PTONf3 FROM CITIZENS_ PRESENT There were none. 11 ?/V Y P ?(') OL ITAN MGISQUITO CO NTROL DISTRICT �,r,ESQ 5t_a 612- 645- 9149 •� 1C OrY�° �OarJ« '1 �,j.i �3J ��. �`a#�r° + �s �. S r'> R.D. SJOGREN, Ph.D, .WJ GE511A f November 5, 19 t " .,fir #'"+�- s1u*v��i s ►+ ' � �, l dw( ad J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager, City of m.,3,rr � 5341 Maywood Road - Mound, MN 5536 4 Dear 'Mr. Shukle In response to your letter or (,X tk. ,tjer 1 0, 1990. we wilt foryva west Y to the Scientific Pcer Review Board 'Fhev alrcAy are aware of a, ti by reccivingcopies of the- corres nderncc „that h is tkert l:,tie, b direet,'cprrts' d ice r w�th Ms. Pacholk p9. f' ' Y Yr (( � s � e � e 'Ietter r. p Keith _SG!ornon), and from he rescri $PftP tAneodn 'csit V V LOW.. ✓Y, /. I Y. . 0 ”' { ` The SPRP has directc,l laborxory re tarChl looking at acute and/or tltronic ef':ects of methoprene on Cladocera, cu, x! poktk, annphipods, Leopard Frogs 'and of Bacillus thurini;iensis isruelensis (13ri) on r i. , ,rit K�, chironomids, crayfish.. "American Toads, and Chorus Frogs, In addition, °' art studies investigating effects of control materials on chironomids, invertcbrat- furir, Fei �ir�g Blackbirds and songbirds. If you could Clarify 0 the specific scope of investigation desirvd, this would help direct the SPRP to futtttta ,. assignment of studies. An agreement was made with Ms. F'acholke in early July of 1990 that we would not spray in the Lake Landon area. This f.v,rs honored for the rem of the field season. For our records, please verify that M,. Pacholke's request is representative of other residents in the Lake Langdon area. If that is the case, we, will continue ,to omit the Lake Langdon area from' our con trol program. Sub} cquent meetings 'Will then "not bit necessary. Thank you for. objective involvemcm in thin siwtt'aon. F ly Sincerely, FV Y �r w •"�•" P ,p,,..., 3�yw yr�r , Robert D. Sjogren, Ph.D, t . VircCtor cc: Richard Anderson, Ph.D. AFFIRMATIVE A CTION Dl :C MOSQ11111) C PEI' )(,;RAM ON TE' LAF-, AFA ti'Il V I I H, M 1, n u V F r4 E JJJ /* 4 jk s v 4 PKT1'r1(,,lN TO 1 MOSQUITO CONTFOL PR( N*,PAM ON THE LAKE LAND' DON AREA ift e in W H F F FA R 3 r r C S c , VC V k, f t 14 v MM I I A tr t t t" t he Cl t, y (4 modtill t hd T, t, h- I ,I to,) A '! - s I d t NOW, TH F' . k EFO kE , urjdt!r s i(, .; n t cl, re d e r, t s of t t r L,,j k �1'1 31 f-A z o'. luf" to pt- rmanently discontinut: the i •ir, f or they Lake Langdon area N M F A i RE S i T -17 Ll 0 t g/8 `��tatcs onipan% � Powe r C 414 NFcobej Mail ke"a 564, i No (612)130-75$8 .'A r 2 1991 A ` ; : , ! — COUN'l' I ES 11; NSPS TOR Y ap&'M GO's A so�+++*� Otow S kJOW j4" D y SWW C LAP43V mva-c j 960so, JW"os L Otow O&Vviias � A" CW L On. Whoa j mvdc' MK No* C CO-440, c itie� Ut i 1 Commission 9 ter u 99 ' States Power Company ("NSPOO increase with the Minnesota Public i e (-'J.,)rnl- 1 C P 1 0 The Corrilission has referred Clf AcIrnnistrative Hearings for V a: C h e a rJ1 r a s was held at 9:30 a.m. on March 15, R'Char'd (-. Luis, at the American Center BOulevard, St. Paul, Minr.esota 55101. matters are discussed in the PUC s Notice or F"f,l wY ic' - h is enclosed. Also enclosed is icat ion for Rate Increase. If there are C f r - c- to call the undersigned. DAVID A. LAWP�ENY- Director - i.aw • 21q a N'4 "ice to Counties and Municipalities Under Minn. Stat. S 216B.16(l) BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION STATE OF MINNESOTA In the Metter of the Application } of kls STATES POWER COMPANY, ) M,nr, ; - apolis, Minnesota, for } Aatt i ty to Change It5 Schedule of (l€ct.riC. Rates for Retai Customers } WW , t�he 'State of Minnesota } • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION FO RATE lKREA Docket No. E- 002JGR- 91 -001 On January 28, 1991, Northern States Power Company (NSP) filed notice of an increase in its electric rates with the Minnesota Public Utilities Co +m fission pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 1216B.16. The Company proposed a schedule of new rates to take effect on March 29, 1991. The Commission has suspended the proposed rates so they do not go into effect and has set the matter for formal hearing. Pursuant to State law, the Commission will permit the Company to put interim rates into effect on March 29. 1991, until a final rate level is determined. NSP has filed a schedule of interim rates based on the Commission Order in the preceding NSP electric rate case. The Commission will determine the amount of increase in rates it will allow on or before December 2, 1991, and final rates reflecting that determination will be implemented thereafter. If the final rates level is less than the interim rate level, the amount collected during the interim period attributable to that difference will be refunded to customers with interest. Examples of the effect of these increases on typical bills are as follows: r 0 Averaq,e Mcr't_tjl.Y Bills use Present* Interim Proposed 250 KWH $ 16.10 $ 17.06 $ 18.34 500 KWH $ 34.70 $ 36.76 $ 37.18 750 KWH $ 49.80 $ 52.76 $ 53.53 1000 KWH $ 64.90 68.76 69.87 Small General Ser.ice 500 KWH $ 36.80 38.99 $ 39.28 1000 KWH $ 67.00 $ 70.98 $ 71.97 2000 KWH $127.40 $134.97 $137.33 The Department of Pisblic Service is conducting an investigation of NSP's books and records. Individual customers will be notified hen public hearings are scheduled. The proposed rate schrdules and a comparison of present and proposed rates may :,e examined by the public during normal business hours at the Department of Public Service, 790 American Center Building, 160 East Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul and at Northern States Power Company offices located at 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis; 2302 Great Northern Drive, Fargo; 421 Wabasha St., St. Paul; 825 Rire St., St. Paul; 1700 E. County Road E, White Bear Lake; 3000 Maxwell Newport; 2763 First Ave. N.W., Faribault; 3930 Pepin Ave., Red Wing; 3515 Third St. N., St. Cloud; 5050 Service Drive, Winona; 500 W. Russell 5t., Sioux Fails; 4501 68th Ave. N., Brooklyn Center; 5309 W. 70th St., Edina; 210 Lime St., Mankato; 5505 County Road 19, Shorewood; 1505 Washington Ave., Montevideo; and 3115 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville. If you wish to intervene or testify in this case, contact the Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings, Fifth Floor, Flour Exchange Building, 310 South Fourth Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55415. * The present rate levels identified in this application represent the rates authorized by the Commission in 1988, in Docket E002/GR -87 -670. V )1 -2- A coj:,y cf the offices of the Bui 'Iding, 160 East Ke I logg 4 Sz- I s c, oen r p 1 _J ' n s r I n g r Ccpies are also ava i 1 _"ll e '-%r -P..'_-;' o f f --' ce a t 4 1 4 14 ic3l I c- Ma I I L. n. E 0 • dated Aug�st N D E 1 bien withd-�w t F., ea� r, lil a ri u a. r 7 2,� 19 rate 1.ncrf%aFf n t.. efl:o-c:tive mar.�h 29, 199- i t 1 s su e ci i is 0 t: A coj:,y cf the offices of the Bui 'Iding, 160 East Ke I logg 4 Sz- I s c, oen r p 1 _J ' n s r I n g r Ccpies are also ava i 1 _"ll e '-%r -P..'_-;' o f f --' ce a t 4 1 4 14 ic3l I c- Ma I I L. n. E 0 • t t q't'r changes is unable to reascnableness c: t he -- -ce o'f Administ-razi o M St a t 16 Fitisfactorily resolve all the proposed rates on -lie Co ~mission will therefore th." Adm,"ristrative Hearings for increase be allocated by as fC1 5.3 2.3 proposed rates by Co -1, the Commission will direct the F-, ch e d u e into e f f e c t Interim the Corran-ission ultimately orderz a than is recove.red through interim i :5 E su bd - 3 (1588). Pdl"' ieS sha'L I ad the issues in the course of the herein: Is th test ye- increase Sought by the Ccmrany reaso,nazle or will it result in unreasr)nable and excessive earnings by the Company 2 is the rate design proposed by the Company reasonable? 2 • • Y)3 V.1 v and trtW 3i ,. , y 4 . „ .. _,l vo P :'cxedure Ac N_n:i. Shat • �y o f A.,. to lYV �. 7� an(j W t o E„ inrl. Rules, rjar_s i , S t a t ut .. • . x +. D" Courts mav v and cra'_ , IT C: it - f {t<< ._.,ng �,':st f:le a notice .. (At th A <amv,n,istrative Law Judge w; ph 'i o f r _.: *,._., t .:,* :e and Order for Hearing. . au1 _ _r . °au* ' issues )" '-n r_• ..C' appear. '= - w ^ • '`,r ? ents, records, and W . r { >•,:: 1 -;, �:_ t ta_- 1 uicns. They should take f_ V =may become public o' ie un"er Slat. V.1 v * ! Paftie-s to thl's 4 NIM Dn-A� t' ry t-T. n e wi th es Of such s s 1' on Minn. wi 11 be held in in t�le Large Aniierilcan Center -Minnesota 55101. should attend the an scheduling. Gt 4cCationS and similar I IS, Silt , i U. rf�'d 'to ac't on the w prcposed -rates are This t w T,1 n t s the parties C .3 L h e C i -.1gs t o I C. w T C c Illn s +I r a i. n s and revues that t A c i r, s t r a t ',aw J u d e s u h i s fi r e p o r t b Se em 27, 1991, t a the C ommissio n adequate opportunity f�:7 thorouc.h - of -, App.lication of Lobbyinq, Provisions -- The lobbying Dr of th;- Et hi in Gav -.rnment Act , M inri. S tat. S§ I OA. 6111. rit apply t general rate cases. Persons appearing in this proceeding may be sub, to registration, reporting, and other requiremenz:s set in that Ac"- All persons appearing in this case are urged to refer to the Act and to cor.tact the Minnesota 'E'thicall P-rac,ices telephone number (612) 296-1720, with a.-.y questions. 4 NIM Dn-A� • Y n e .... a t� ♦ , _ .. ♦ ._ _, l: 5y' r ;i, r i Y ♦ r :. r w i ' '• _ ' r " :. A . _... Tic o ar: Company's Iast two rat. ':.,. ?' 4t .:E: P :; :.- shciII be mailed at ?.ecsL tF'R d<av,s b(�fr)re th «_ f_:-,-t doy cf hearings. e . Uispla� ...s in legal newzpapers of affectf'2 -: counties other newspaLers of generc cir,lila't-"on within the Company's service area. These advertise:c:n— s shall appear at least ten days before the first day of hearings. They sh I1 incline the heac?:. ^g RATF INCREASE NOTICE, whit,',, hPa(I :~ s a r in bcId face t�. r_ ro s(a r ... ..:'� F . � 'tJ A.i',- ♦..: 1. w e r J • N • • 811 N A R B 1 d 55, g I ev a r ,.4 MPIJC Docket No. E- 002 CA' Docket No. lioTICE k F APPEARANCF • E A.M. A- Law judge: r, w. L 3^i.. below will appear at the TELEPHONE NUM-EER: PARTY'S Aq'J'OP��--'y r I -, P, Clfj4En REPRESENTATIVE: 0 F.- I C E A� U R E S'S : TFI—E-PHON. NUMBEIP: S�GNAT"� OF 1 OP, :'A "'. 4 f, 0" y 47j7 T'trc: City o �4t?�rt�tl. Ali F G� ,r;� ,.�;�,•,,, , " i, "_.' v: 1..,,.1 '"*sit: 10 CIIv Of k1ound r)c;ir ma', ter Over the l&a sc .(, ?'i 1 u t; i I '.a , l: "r it iC1t15 a1tt; ,ations w, it) the caval attitude that 1 bupposedly Illd ti tV,rrr�.rrt� �_� r ,.,.1 i,� tt cake of .c;etairt of IDik Rail's property to the City of Nfour,rl I w "aw to pass; :rc yr,l, tf,ro these n:r are ma,. C)ver the last f;,r ;, ,tl :�., l vcr; hard, and have ,Spent a great deal of my p:rsorml bine, Ili U'Y)! ;;�' TO _._,,, l :;rt,'.., Uii5 :ales tran Let Inc quickly review the issues. In September, 1990, I >akoui Rail e!lt :,r�.a two an agrf:c;nlent with tt,:: City of Mound to sell it four parcels µfuc:h consisted of tAo large parking IoLs, one which the City was leasing from Dakota Rail - the South parking lot and one which was currently being used by the public: subject to no lease - the Nc,rai parking lot, TtK:%e two parcels comprised approximately 80,000 square feet of approximate 98,000 square feet of property. The remaining 18,000 square feet consists of two parcels which are alleys. One is adjacent to the Johnson law office. It consists of approximately 6,000 square feet, the other is south of the Coast to Coast store, comprising about 12,000 square feet. The first alley, Johnson alley, was put into the deal because the City pointed out that it was included in their parking lot lease. The second was "thrown in" to "make the deal" in the final period of negotiations. The total price of the properties to be sold to Mound was 5235,000. L)akota Rail, Inc, is the contract for deed holder of this property under an agreement with the McLeod County Regional Rail Authority (Authority) who holds title to most of the rail line property. In 1989, while Dakota Rail was in bankruptcy, the Mcleod County Region al Rail Authority borrowed a substantial sum from the State of Minnesota to purchase the rail line from die Burlington Northern Railway Company. The State holds a mortgage on the rail line. A provision of the a greement between Dakota Rail and the Authority allows Dakota Rail to sell certain designated properties, iFir CiF?,r,I F OFF�"E 25 r+. n^ s �o Nt,ir;h - �r ;a', t1tJ 53b i. 1612)567-4018 FAX fFir1 LK C87 M a ° : 1:i 1 ,rti,.In: : a�.. t1.c 1 ` --3rth an(i so.,itll pask,lttg Iota tai 11 1 l ) t,t t' 1r;',�,ti is ti t'I to x'11 certain ()deer p �lrcek not 1. tb - , I „ a , l she A1,itl� ,i ;t, t �?r ;ti titC� ti's tlt ;:SA, ,ales One (on tFs (� il`�t f�t r 3C.4. t.. C <.� '.k ° .' �i i 1:4" ��.tei tz P of tlBC w wis the i):1�2 rte [ hropt rt° in Mound OUI k 0tnl)atit l?urJ1,001 1),d?,ota F-o! In March of 199tt suFjc� ti) the agrocnienLS made bcr,4cen the MnT,ot, tlx� F�,n} ; =��st'r, ,nLi the Jhri { Whcn I negotiated the sale of the pr� rtz bct� -4ce l IW:o(::i Rail ancf mc,mid, I thought that tl)e alley b) Johnson s office was includcd irl the pri>lx�rtr atiarl,ik)1t toy ill bc,.a�ise a Vri'lX�r N dcs::ribeJ as the South Parking I_ot v.a, in.ludc�d, alld the ;01C- was Bart of the Soutli parkln� lot property the City leased. 0t10st of the pTojoerty th.e descnptions of leased property.) In I t Ct nilx r, 1 was to find out tl +dt thi was not tic case . I knee that the alley south of the Coast to Coast .as not a desit_natid ptoperty for �lc, but I also knew that previously the Flail Authority and the INInDut had allowed the "Fr to sell il)r rnore valuable Coast to Cnast property and I d1J not Lh.wk th,:y xould lo e any oh to releasing the relatively low value alley. I wac to find out that this vvas an ini orrect ascurnption. In December, when I realized that die two small prolxst =es were under tic State mortgage, I immediately approached the ltinDot fm a release They irlJicated they needed time to study the issue, and in Feb ruary, 1991, the)' agreed to provided a re'_:ase from their mortgage as long as the gross proceeds from the properties rcicawd be given to them or the Authority to reduce the mortgage, Although having no legal obligation to do so. I agreed to the time extension, agrtxd to allow the City to use the parking lot during this time period rcnt free, and agreed to approach the Rail Authority with the State's proposal. The problem was that the price to Mound was not broken down oti a parcel by parcel basis. I estimated a value for the two alleys as $18,000. I consulted with your City Manager and City Attorney who both indicated that they could not give an opinion as to the value of these two small properties. Nevertheless, I looked at the four parcels, two being large parking lots bordering on major commercial streets, and mci being small alleys, one not even bordering on a public street, and I concluded that $ 18,000 was a fair allocation of the S235,000 total price for these two properties. I then formally requested that the Rail Authority release these two properties for $18,000. The Authority responded that they would not do this, and counter proposed that our company exchange two parcels worth approximately $100,000 for these two alleys along with the S1F,000. To me this was a whoUy unreasonable offer, and I could not responsibly accept this on behalf of Dakota Rail. I then personally appeared before the Authority on two separated occasions in the March 1991 to ask them to reconsider their position and to ( of A mu mf 1'ai:r 3 11t C�iG''ifC �onl , t�(1i, 1 wil.• .''I iii; t ?' �i�tr1C1. ^1fS1 "1 0%1`C a63 K', > ",11C: i.t'f� U"ia"!Cl 1x tl -iv :�U 1i lity L4 .St dRl�liE f�r (.' ".0 tVkO J1 :Ojw 111e"'Jvofth S11.$,1AXM p the S!'S jxitl or just Ohie VAO piv1w.r1ies, ihc'' di no! uha q th t position Th('lr Li�z %V'IS 1111 111c5cJay', Nlarch . 19th, 1991. Throuy;huut this e nim: l iof eCs I havC k C pt y our 1711) Nl aria�C r and ( try At Ioniey advtud of the progress on thcsk issues. As sex +n as the State indi ated that they had a problem releasing the prolvily from Ojeir mortgai;c, I coma tcd both individuals and advised them of this situation I have Aoiked very hard over the last several months to try to make this sale happen. I spokc with the MnLkrt officials, sent them letters, and provided various information for thcm. I'se nu :i twice with the Rail Autlicinty formally, and many times with the counsel for O ic Authority, its Chairman, and various members on a one to one basis. All of these efforts Acre not sucoessful in having the Authority find some reasonable basis for releasing dic twn small parcels. I am no %� persuaded that they %kill not change their position on this niirwr. In early March 1 revirrled the City's deposit on this purchase. The City Attorney had advised me that if Dakota Rail d(x;s not perform on this contract, that he would counsel the City to begin legal action against our company, In light of this, I requested that my counsel review the contract very thoroughly to advise me of our legal position. My counsel has advised m: that Dakota Rail has no further legal obligation to the City. He is transmitting that opinion in a letter to the City Attorney dated today. The contract provided our company wit1130 days to clear objections to title. In October your counsel appropriately infonned us in writing of four objections. We have spent more than the 30 days trying over and over again to clear the objections to title, all of our efforts to this end have been unsuccessful_ We asked whether the City wanted to close on the transaction notwithstanding the title defect, as was your option under the contract, and the City appropriately informed us that they did not. Therefore, our obligation was to retum the deposit, which we did, thus making the contract null and void. Notwithstanding, the foregoing, on March 20th I sent the City Attorney a letter outlining three options that I am prepared to make available to the City through its City Council meeting this evening. They are spelled out in that letter, a copy of which I am attaching, and are briefly the following: 1) We will sell the two large parking lots which are not under the State mortgage for $217,0. (I'hat 1s the original 5235,000 price less $19,000 for the two alleys.) N .r: t'sr'; r ; 1 . 1ti _ rte N Z I ( s 1 } t ry } /� /� 1 �r.y�p x r Y�' i18i� 1 .o, the cio �/I 5, for a {..�:i relea :.R. t We will sk�l! the Burets, larking lot, the one die City has leased, for $100,000 to the City:, 'Hus i� OW wirci A!,cie the Metropolitan Waste Control Comrnission has agreed to pay the Oty S 05,0(0 for rghts to have their eyuiprrtcnt there, leaving the City with a net $55,000 gist irr that cr tlic parking lot As l iii -d ;,, the City Attortae ), the sc offers arc not an adm is sion by u s that the City has any lc jl h v�is for intcrt;st in these properties; but as one final attempt to resolve a potential dispute and t) better commuruty relations between Dakota Rail, Inc. and the City. They are the hesr we ciao do, and we are not prellarexi to negotiate further from these numbers. The tatty Ws had the use of this pioperty since January rent frre. I informed the City Manager Owt we would be prepared to lease the South parking lot on a month to month basis beginning March 15, but that we are not in a position to continue the current situation. Therefore, as I utdicated in the letter of March 20th to the City Attorney, the options descrilt-d above are available throes ;h this evening, after which they arc withdrawn. If not acc pted, we expect the City eithcs to agree to a month to month lease, or to vacate the properly. If legal action is decided upon by the City, we will defend it vigorously, 1 hope that you understand that I N-,e done everything that I reasonably can to try to address this difficult situation. 1 have wurked very hard to find some way to fiend a mutually acceptable compromise, and I believe that we have gone wall beyond the boundaries of our legal msponsihilitics to the City. I would appreciate it if you would share this letter with the members of your City Council, and I hope that you and the rnernbers of the City Council will appreciate our position, and work with us to resolve this situation in an amicable fashion, Very truly ours Elh M. A. Mills President EMAM:mh cc. Eric Nilsson, Esq. Curtis A. Pearson, Esq. Edward J. Shukle, Jr. Mar "1i 1; Curifs A. l l9� { r� :Ti�� 1 Wurst, Pcarscn, Liao,, L's t %, .iol l 1100 FIrat B ar tk Flavt: RE found Purchase bear kfr i s rsi I t`a%iw Avrk very hard ove the bast few months to persuade the State of Minnesota and the N1 County Rvgiunal Rail Authority to release the two small alleys that comprise die property to have hewn sold by Dakota Rail, Inc. to the City of Mound. Although the State Department of Transportation has agreed to release these properties if the proas proceeds would go to them or to the Regional Rail Authority, the Rail Authorit) has continually refused to agree to these sales in any reasonable basis. I tun now persuaded that the Rail Authority w' not agree to the sale of these two small parcels. As you know, the large parcels, comprising the North parking lot, north of the rail line, west of the Coast to Coast store; and the South parking lot, south of the rail tint, east of the Norwest Bank building, are available for us to sell free and clear of the State moxlgage. 1 therefore suggest the following alternatives for the City of Mound to consider to resolve any potential dispute between the City and our company. These proposals are made with the understanding that the making of these proposals is in no way an admission on our part that the City has legal basis for interest in these properties, and is made for the sole purpose of promoting better community relations between the City of Mound and Dakota Rail, Inc.: Option Number One: The City purchases the South Parking lot. The property is approximately 52,000 square feet. At $3.40 a square foot, the property is worth $156,000. Dakota Rail will sell the property to the City for $100,400. The City would be able to retain the $45,000 the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has agreed to give the City for its rights there, therefore, the City will be able to acquire that property for a net of $55,004. CORPORATE 4MCL. 25 Adams St. N., Hvcrirson, MN 55350 612- 587 -4018 FAX 612- 587-0875 0, y 0 f k i �g9 r•. / 011tirrrt Ntimber %,w 17ak qa Rill .gall sell tO the City the North Parking lot and the South Ouch Is tii : origir;al price of $235,( -- less $18,000 for the two all�� s ()latit "l NuMber Three: Dal+utt halt will }gay die City 515,000 for full releases. Irt opL� ;)n5 one and Vko above, Dakota mail will agree to the City's easement for $elmont Lane and to forego arty- firther payment for utility crossings curr existing acrossr the right of way east of Commerce Boulevard. In these options, the City wilt agree to plat the propci -tics and to Flat other railroad parcels in Mound. I understar)J that you havc a ane:cting with the City Council on Tuesday, March 26th. These propw,als will be avAil ale to die City through that meeting, and if not accepted, an wit .-awn thereafter. Thank you for your cooperation in this niatter. Very truly/ tits, C E111 M. A. Mills President EMAM/rr cc: Fric Nilsson, Esq, John Thomas, Esq. Sheldon Ties Allan Vogel Y1A_FAX AND MESSENGER Curt is, A. a Wurst, War s +, b Mor .r I IOU k i rot ttwa pl 0 w t, M s nne -n I i Re: Lease Extension and option to Purchase .5 Agreement dated September 14, 1990 between Dakota Rail, Inc. and the City of Mound (the "Purchase Agreem nt Dear'" Cur..t Th i s let t. e f u f i 'r/ i. "P c" P 1 h al a 'w } iriu luring which j !tated the l "t ;�� ,1 . ; lo c ,:ar the release of the St ratrx rtnq t �� aP� fa,�� t �� . � � t h.1 (Ir by the Purchase First, � n cd er t 1,30 ona I yn in (A ?;�i�� r3�.:� *.y } a �':d t rJ DakotaRail and the Cit of ! � ..rt,l r��as�t t F'�� r,r °.,,r, ; .i OH I O t . n provisions issions of the Purch Agr't;kgn-nt : 1) j' °"arAjr sal•} t r - Sig' 1 i nq the conditim, of title, ObjOct ions thereto, curt (of Ok it � -ions .and the result ' if objections ark:° not c urcii rarvi ) f <ar lyr°apn 0, which h provides than z ". • they Dakota Ra witl convey y, its , r7t -rvnt 1 w,a o f nothing more than a qu it cl cloed . T ,. " h r, t t i .;c= ponvisions operated as follows: Dakota hail tags -i t_f_, f �, r� ..t. .� wn i tment for a t itle irl:,urKarace polivy an did sm. ","•r:3 th- f. °11 ��!, Jdays by which to e.x< -Ti tht' Mn3rt, ion of tit 10 as rc.t i,. , r d 1 ; t h— c Ommitment and to not ify Dakota Rx'ai l of .'arty cat.° jcwt i on-, t ;� .� °; r i. ! .at ", i l ity. Notice of the suh ob j ec ti on .. the :;t.a * r; ;rte ; - w iB conveyed by Mr. Underwood's letter to me d atrr i Ch°t al mr° `: ; Dakota Rail was then allowed 30 days by which to c iarn t ho! r ,. -t ,ion. As you know, this time was extW to March 1, l5., ysn it became apparent that it r elea e of the State: ,:y r W — bind not be Wr"thc omirig on terms reAson; ab <aC:'ceptca: le + ?l+ar W -s KKK At this junCtU1 "0, the objection rr: ryainf3 trn('4,r`£ =:i. c, °,; �. r. , � ,.r£.r;' lOrI date of March I has par., , the Wt sant nco kc h 7 bc oomes C04 s : � £. In ll hurr, the l�qr r o nt k,r •,ar as of l t1 � .� Mo , entitled t � vr.,id ear nest money. ,Mr. Mi a l y ret ur nel tit£ rYarn;£ .,t: mw;.ry M iti, t * ` "� : to Mr. Schul c a,c Ma °ra 1 <, , t CITY COUNCIL PACKET - 3 -26 ---21- #3 i kt G� 4 \ VtUT 6W DONNT 111" 4 k Curtis A. Pearson, Esq. March 26, 1991 Page 2 U Y 6 You must bear in mind, Curt, that the Purchase Agreement imposes absolutely no obligation on Dakota Rail to cure the objection; to ' obtain 'a release of the State mortgage. All the Purchase Agreement Provides for in this regard is an opportunity for Mound to examine title prior to closing; to object to the condition of title; and to k: waive the objection or allow the Purchase Agreement to terminate (with a return of earnest money) if the objection is not cured. Under no provision did Dakota Rail warrant title or undertake to cure objections raised by the City of Mound. Dakota Rail simply had the contractual or.portuni to rare any objections. � In this regard, I refer you to the well seasoned case of Long v. Mz1le,r, 46 Minn. 13 (1891) which concerned remarkably similar circumstances to those you and 1 face today. Specifically, in Low, the purchase agreement contained typical provisions allowing for examination of title, notice of objections and an opportunity to cure. In the process, the buyer discovered a mortgage on a portion of the land under contract. The court thus observed that the seller was "unable to give a clear title ", and because the buyer was unwilling to waive the defect on a timely basis, the ' contract was terminated. The buyer therefore had no right to specific performance when he later changed his mind and offered to take title subject to the mortgage. The court held that the buyer was only entitled to a return of his earnest money. I direct your attention to a pa; ticularly salient and concise portion of the court's opinion, wh ch reads as follows: "It is assigned as error that the finding of the trial court that the [sell.erl was "unable to give a clear title" is not justified by the evider -ce. This does not mean that the [seller) was unable to procure, and then to convey, a clear title, but that he had not such a title to convey. The contract did not obligate the [seller] to procure an unincumbered title. It allowed the [buyer] to refuse to accept a conveyance of the [seller's] title if it was not free from incumbrance. It also afforded the (seller) a limited opportunity to perfect his title by removing the incumbrance, but it _plac,ed h_im under no oblig to do so." (emphasis added) 46 Minn. 13 at 14. Similarly here, Curt, Dakota Rail was under no obligation to procure an un.inc.umbered title. Curtis A. Pearson, Esq. March 26, 1991 Page ;3 NEVERTHELESS, in the interest of resolving this matter on an amicable basis and for the benefit of all concerned, Mr. Mills applied substantial efforts to procure a release of the State mortgage. By its efforts, Dakota Rail did not create an obligation for itself; it merely took the opportunity afforded it under the Purchase Agreement to attempt to cure an objection to title. After considerable deliberation, the State finally offered to release the mcrtgage if the gross proceeds attributable to the affected parcels were applied against the indebtedness secured by the state mortgage. This proposal left open, of course, the precise dollar amount and deferred to the Regional Rail Authority as to the ultimate price. Mr. Mills reasonably calculated the value of the affected parcels at $18,000 and proposed this figure to the Regional Rail Authority. He received in response a counteroffer which Mr. Mills reasonably determined to be about $100,000. Despite repeated, sincere and reasonable efforts to achieve agreement from the Regional Rail Authority, Dakota Rail was not been able to procure acceptable terms. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 7 of the Purchase Agreement, the Agreement became null and void, and Dakota Rail returned the earnest money to Mound. Despite the foregoing, Dakota Rail has persisted in efforts to resolve matters with Mound on a reasonable basis. By way of Mr. Mills letter to you dated March 20, 1991, Dakota Rail has advanced three alternatives whereby the issue between Dakota Rail and Mound can be settl6d. I urge you to give these your recommendation when advising the Mound City Council. Finally, you indicated that you would be willing to distribute a copy of this letter to council members at this evening's meeting. The Council should know that Dakota Rail has dedicated considerable thought to its position and intends to stand fast if the alternatives set forth in Mr. Mills' letter of March 20 are rejected. i OWE INil"K W01 I 6� DONNYHY Curtis A. Pearson, Esq. March 26, 1991 Page 4 1 trust that reason will prevail. Thank you. Very truly yours, Eric 8. Nilsson CC: Mr. Elli Mills 1 ff CC MAR 2 CAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT Hoard of Directors Regular Meeting, Wednesday, February 27, 1991 Tonka Bay City Hall 1,. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Foster at 8:07 p.m. 2. Roll Call. Members Present: Bert Foster, Vice Chair, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Jan Boswnkel, Treasurer, Minnetonka Beach; Scott Carlson, Minnetrista; Thomas Reese, Mound; Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Douglas Babcock, Secretary, Spring Park; Marvin Bjorlin, 'Tonka Bay; David Barton. Victoria; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also Present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Sgt. Wm. Chandler, Sheriff's Water Patrol ; - Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. Members Absent: David Cochran, Chair, Greenwood; JoEllen Hurr, Orono; Thomas Martinson, Wayzata. 3. Reading of Minutes: Grathwol moved, Bjorlin seconded, approval of the minutes of 1/23/91 as submitted. Motion carried, Rascop abstaining. 4. Public Comments; Jeff Fox, 5270 Howards Point Road, Excelsior, asked to be heard regarding the definition of 3' of navigable water for temporary dock extensions. He was informed he will be given an opportunity to speak under agenda item B.4). S. Vice Chair Report, Foster S.A. "Save the Lake" Annual Recognition Dinner, February 21 Foster reported 73 people attended the Save the Lake dinner and comments were positive. It was an honor to have new DNR Commissioner Rodney Sando, as the main speaker. 5.B. Committee Assignments Rascop moved, $oswinkel seconded, approval of the following 1991 committee assignments: Lake Use Committee Water Structures & Environment Committee Robert Pillsbury, Chair James Grathwol, Chair Bert Foster, Vice Chair Douglas Babcock, Vice Chair Douglas Babcock David Bartos Marvin Bjorlin Marvin Biorli:n Scott Carlson Jan Boswinkel James Grathwol Scott Carlson JoEllen Hurr Bert Foster Tom Martinson JoEllen Harr Robert jZascop 'Tom Martinson Tom Reese Robert Pillsbury Robert Rascop Tom Reese Robert Slocum 1 LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991' Save The Lake Fund Campaign Advisory Committee Robert Pillsbury, Chair Robert Rascop, Chair Robert Slocum, Vice Chair Douglas Babcock Jan Boswinkel Jan Boswinkel Tom Martinson Bert Foster Tom Reese James Grathwol JoEllen Hurr Eurasian Water Milfoil Tom Reese Task Force Tom Meese, Chair Bert Foster, Vice Chair David Barton Marvin Bjorlin Douglas Babcock JoEllen Hurr Robert Rascop Robert Slocum Member, All Committees: LMCD Chair David Cochran Ex- Officio: Executive Director Gene Strommen Motiort carried unanimously. 6. Committee Reports 6.A. EURASIAN WATER MILFOIL (EWM) TASK FORCE, Chair Reese 6.A.1) Bid - Barging /trucking Contract Reese moved, Foster seconded, approval of the bid of Minnetonka Portable Dredging on the barging /trucking contract for the 1991 weed control program, subject to approval of the 1991 EWM harvesting budget, at $285 /hr based upon a proposed work program as detailed in the contract agreement, estimating 50 - 8 hour days in the budget. Motion carried unanimously. 6.A.2. 1991 EWM Harvesting Budget Reese submitted a 1991 EWM budget proposal in the amount of $263,315. to operate the program for ten weeks proposing to start June 10. The budgeted expenses are proposed to be offset by income from the LMCD municipalities, MN DNR, private contributions and drawing the balance of needed funds from the uncommitted Milfoil Reserve balance. Information from Hennepin County Commissioner Tad Jude is that Iiennepin County will not provide any funds this year. It is also noted that private contributions are approximately 1/3 the goal of $75,000 at this time. Reese said if the funding goal is not met, the season will have to be curtailed. Responding to a question from Babcock, Reese said the Corps of Engineering funds probably will not be F ,- >rt:hcoming, and none is figured in the 1991 budget. — continued 2 LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 Reese moved, Grathwol seconded, approval of the 1991 F.WM budget as submitted. Babcock suggested a cap be put on the amount to be expended from the Milfoil "Reserve balance, at which time continuation, of the program would have to be re- evaluated. Reese said there would be enough funds to carry the program to the middle of summer without using the reserve. Babcock moved, Foster seconded, to amend the motion by stipulating the program is to be reviewed before using any of the reserve. Motion carried unanimously. The motion as amended was carried unanimously. c Boswinkel commented that the weed harvesting program is the only thing that is making the bake navigable. He suggested newspaper advertisements to advise the public of the need for funding. 6.A.4) Concept of Lakeshore Weed Pickup Reese proposed a program to accept weeds from private individuals at the Weed harvesting receiving barge. It offers' the opportunity for someone to develop a business of collecting weeds from private beaches. There is also the possibility of accepting weeds from private cutters. Babcock commented that this has proven successful in Madison. Wisconsin. Foster, suggested accepting weeds from the beaches at no charge. However, if a commercial cutter is using the barge it will be necessary to reserve the right to measure the flow and snake a charge. Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, approval of the concept of Lakeshore weed pickup for disposal on the LMCD barge, subject to final Board - approved agreement between participants LMCD, barge contractor and private operators. Motion carried unanimously. 6.A.3) Project Manager Position Reese introduced Ted Maro as the candidate for the Project Manager's position. Mao expressed his interest in the Lake and considers the position a challenge. Reese moved, Carlson seconded, approval of Ted Maro as Project Manager under the terms of employment between Maro and the LMCD. Motion carried unanimously. Position responsibilities will start March 1. 6.A.5) Bill for An Act Re= Funding for Exotic Plants, Organisms The EWM Task Force has reviewed A Bill for An Act prepared by Representative Tony Kinkel. The bill suggests a $2.00 surcharge be placed on each watercraft licensed, the funds to be used for management of exotic plants and organisms, particularly Eurasian Water Milfoil and Zebra Mussel. The Task Force has made +- continued 3 LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 some suggested changes in the proposa and wishes to send them back to Kinkel. Grathwol, said fie could approve the concept if the EWM Task Force were to dead with the bill's author on suggested changes, but not representing the LMCD at committee or legislative hearings without advance Beard approval. Foster moved, Babcock seconded, to approve the concept of a surcharge to be placed on watercraft licensed, the funds to be used for management of exotic plants and organisms, the,EWM Task Force and Chair to work cut the details with the bill's author. Motion carried unanimously. H. WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Grathwol B.1) Minutes Grathwol moved, Pillsbury seconded, approval of the minutes of the 2/9/91 meeting as submitted. Motion carried _unanimously - B.2j Order for David Thomas Development, Bayshore 11 Grathwol moved, Pillsbury seconded approval of the Findings and Order for the David Thomas Development, Bayshore 1I Homeowners Association, Inc. as prepared by LeFevere. Motion carried unanimously. 8.3) Resolution for Residential Temporary Dock Extensions W i tho ut a Permit. The Board received a Resolution for Residential Temporary Duck Extensions. The proposed Resolution allows the LMCD Board of Directors to waive applications for temporary dock extensions at residential docks under certain guidelines, adding the following paragraph to the current Resolution: "During the loaf water period the LMCD encourages residents of two or more adjoining sites to combine their authorized dock use area for a single common dock, for their respective non - commercial private` use. The side setback requirements must be maintained at the outer site lines of the combined sites. No more than restricted watercraft may be stored at such a dock." In response to an inquiry from Slocum about the 4 boat limitation, it was noted anything more than 4 boats requires a multiple dock license. Staff was advised to add "without a multiple dock license." at the end of the last sentence of the new paragraph 2. Boswinkel asked about how far out a deck can be built. He was informed th::�rc is no limit, sub;er_t to Water Patrol determination that there is no interference with navigation. Jeff Fox, 5270 Elowards Point Road, Excelsior, objected to the provinion of 1.a. which allow. -, extension.; necessary to meet the normal navigable water depth of 31 . He sees a greater need for depth for larger boats. Grathwol a.ysured Fox the committee will recognize that problem. continued 4 LFICD Board of Directors February 27 1991 Grathwol moved, Pillsbury seconded, approval of the Resolution Residential Temporary Dock Extensions Without a Permit Application as amended, staff to insert the data regarding the current water elevation. B.4) 1991 Multiple Dock and District Mooring Area License Renewal Applications Grathwol moved. Bjorlin seconded, approval of the following dock and District mooring Area license renewals for 1991, including Orders, Stipulations, otter specific conditions, Village certificates having been received or time expired for responses= A. Renewals Without Change Bayshore Manor Condominium Assn., Excelsior Bay Cardinal Cove Beach Assn., Cooks Bay Crystal Bay Service, Crystal Bay Curly's Minnetonka Marina, Inc., Lower Lake South Driftwood Shores Assn. , Harrisons Bay Gray's Landing Homeowners Assn., Grays Bay Harrison Harbor Twinhome Assn., Harri - )ns Bay Eennepin County, Spring Park Bay Howard's Point Marina, Inc., South Uppt;- Lake Lakeshore Village Apts., Black Lake Lord Fletchers of the Lake, Coffee Cove Maple Crest Estates, Jennings Bay Meadowbrook Boat Club, Grays and Libbs Lake Minnetonka Beach, City of, East Crystal Bay, Lafayette Bay and Lower Lake North Navarre Cove Homeowners Assn., Garmans Bay Nesland, Richard, Wayzata Bay Ridgewood Cover Property Owners Assn., Jennings Bay Schmitt Marina, Excelsior Bay Seahorse Condo Assoc., Jennings Bay Seton Twinhomes, Seton Lake Seton View, Seton Lake Seton Village Assn., West Arm Tonka Bay, City of, Lower Lake South Victoria Estates, North Arm Walden Tract X Owners Assn., St.Louis Bay Walter's Port Improvement and Maintenance Assn., Carmans Bay Wayzata, City of, Wayzata Bay Willow Woods Corp., Gideons Bay B. Renewals With Minor Changes Grandview Point Assn., Carsons bay Back license 1990 from: 5 B: 9 WGU to: 8 BU , 11.5 WSU Renewal for 1991: 8 BSU. 11.5 WSU Rossberg, A. F., South Upper Lake (Formerly Adeline Johnston) New Owner 5 LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 C. Multiple Dock Licenses Renewals Without Change With Temporary Low Water Variance Renewals - Ho Change Chimo Assn., Carson. Bay 50' extension, total 14ngth 147" Herzog Acres Assn., Wayzata Bay - 22' extension, total length 110' Libbs Bay Boat Club, Libbs'Lake - 12' extension, total length 147' Minnetonka Yacht Club /Lake Mtka Sailing School, St. Louis Bay - 40' extension, total length 76' Site 1 10' extension, total length 10' Site 3 D. Temporary Low Water Variance With Changes Baycliffe Property Owners Assn., South Upper Lake - New Doc, Layout In ::390 a 35' long dock with 11 slips replaced 11 unused lagoon slips. In 1991, 2 of the slips will be on a 24' long dock on the opposite side of the lagoon. Boulder Bridge Homeowners Assn., South Upper Lake - increase from 124' to 144' Gideons Point Homeowners Assn., Gideons Bay - Decrease from 180' to 160' Minnetonka Power Squadron, Big Island Passage - New Site Plan - Instead of 10 96' docks they will have 3 -176', 2 - 150' and 1 125'. Smithtown Bay Assn., Smithtown Bay - Decrease from 196'to 160' With the stipulation that a slip on the extended dock will be used in lieu of Slip 3 in the channel, which is to be roped off. The following District Mooring Area renewal applications City of Deephaven City of Excelsior Minnetonka Yacht Club Motion carried unanimously. B.5) Declaration of Low Water Grathwol moved, Rascop seconded, that the Board declare 1991 a low water year. Motion carried unanimously. Current water elevation was noted to be 926.65'. B. 6) Refund Grathwol moved, Reese seconded,to approve a $100 deposit refund to William Schritter on a permanent dock license satisfactorily completed. Motion carried unanimously. C. LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 B.7, wetland Subcommittee Grathwol moved, Foster seconded, to approve the appointment of Babcock, Reese, Carlson and Rascop to a Water Structures Committee sub- committee to study wetlands on rake Minnetonka. Motion carried unanimously. B.8) Deicing Permit City of Greenwood Grathwol moved, Bj(jrlin seconded, approval of a new deicing permit for the City of Greenwood, subject to receipt of th- foes and pending City Council approval at the Greenwood Council meeting of 3/5/91. Motion carried unanimously. Rascop stated his vote was reluctant because he does not like new deicing permits_ B.9)a) Request from City of Greenwood re Appeal of MN DNR Dredging Permit Renewal for Channel Drive HQA LMCD staff submitted a proposed statement in support of the City of Greenwood's efforts to protect certain wetlands in a channel on the east side of St. Alban's Bay. Paul Haik, Attorney representing the Channel Drive Homeowners Association, said the MN DNR has approved a dredging permit, and renewal extension,. to dredge to 924.4. LeFevere added that the property plat dedicated a proposed lagoon to the City in 1914. No development has occurred with the lagoon. Grathwol said the Committee has not, reviewed the plan in detail as it does not involve an LMCD multiple dock application. He believes the LMCD comment period on the original dredging permit issued in April, 1989, has passed. Pillsbury moved, Babcock seconded, to refer the City of Greenwood request to the Water Structures Committee. Motion carried unanimously. Staff will provide the committee with information as to the Greenwood wetland map and additional background for the 3/9/91 Committee meeting. B.9)b) Gayle's Marina Watercraft Storage A staff memo was circulated updating the Board on the legal action progress on the improper watercraft storage complaint filed against Gayle's Marina per advice of prosecuting attorney Steve Tallen. No action was called for at this time. A jury trial is set for 3/21/91. Agenda Amendment Rascop agreed to amend the agenda to proceed to the Lake Use Committee Report to be followed by the Advisory Committee Report. 6 LMCD Board of Directors F'ebruary 27, 1991 D.I. !Minutes Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, approval of the mi -iutes of 2/25/91 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. D.6- Water Patrol h Chandler had no additions to the report in th- Lake Use Committee minutes. The 1990 Hennepin County activity report is finished. Chandler will submit the 1990 Lake Minnetonka report at the next committee meeting. D.2A. Request for Slow Buoy at Coffee Channel Pillsbury reported arrangements have been made upon Committee recommendation to hav,: Denis Bailey, Engineering Technician, Hennepin County Lake Improvement, to honor the request of Jim Urban, Crystal Bay, by moving the red and green channel buoys on the East side of Coffee Channel out 75' to 100'. D-2B. Resolution Re Fee for Adding a Port of Call Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, to adopt a Resolution to establish an application and public hearing fee of $150.UO when adding a Port of Call to a l license application renewal. Motion carried unanimously. D.3. DNR Hill for an Act Regarding Personal Watercraft The revised draft of the MN DNR Bill for an Act regarding personal watercraft has two serious problems according to the Committee review. The Bill includes a section which restricts personal watercraft operating within 150 feet of another watercraft, other than another personal watercraft, at no greater than a slow-no wake speed. The Committee feels this presents a serious hazard for the personal watercraft operator. The Committee would also urge inclusion of the prolonged operation restriction as is specified in the LMCD Code. Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to authorize Sgt. Chandler and Foster to continue discussions with the MN DNR to encourage their revision of the bill as it conflicts with the LMCD Code in these two areas. Motion carried unanimously. D.4. Resolution 059, Policy on Open Water Fishing Contest Permits Pillsbury moved. Foster seconded, to delete the requirement in Resolution #59 that calls for a copy of th MN 1) N 1�, p along with the LMCD application for an open water fishing contest permit, and that the applicant be denied a refund of the deposit fee if the MN DNR permit is not obtained and presented to the LMCD prior toconducting the event. Motion carried unanimously. E; LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 D.S. On -Sale Wine License Fee for a Preliminary Investigation Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, to add a Section e to Resolution 54 Establishing Liquor License Fees for the Sale of Liquor on the Lake. The new section will set the preliminary investigation fee for an "on -sale" wine license at $500, with the same provisions for refund of unused balance and over - cost recoup as for a liquor license. Motion carried unanimously. Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol 1991 Annual. Operating Agreement The Executive Director reported the Agreement was originally presented to the Board in September, 1990, forwarded to the Sheriff's Office and then to the County Attorney. The final Agreement will not be automatically renewable, a' policy decision of the County Board. The only other change has to do with a stipulation regarding indemnification of LMCD for the actions of Hennepin County Sheriff's employees. Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, approval of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol 1991 annual operating agreement as amended by the County Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. D.7. Deposit Refunds Pillsbury moved, Bjorlin seconded, approval of Special Event License deposit refunds of $100 each to: a) Lafayette Club Winter Event 2/3/91 b) Excelsior Chamber of Commerce - canceled event 2/$/91 Motion carried unanimously. D.B. Water Patrol The Board commended the Water Patrol and Conservation Officers for their arrangements for a successful fish house lake clean-up. Chandler reported the DNR Conservation Officers were exceptionally persistent in policing and documenting litter violators. D.9. Snowmobile Insurance Rascop mentioned a newspaper article he read regarding the newer model high powered snowmobiles. The article said insurance companies will not issue liability insurance on these snowmobiles because of their speeds which can exceed100 mph. Rascop asked what is being done about enforcement of the speed limit on Lakes Minnetonka and whether snowmobiles should have liability insurance to operate on Lake Minnetonka. Chandler replied the Water Patrol is using radar. It has good cooperation with the shore police in locating speeders when they leaves the Lake. Chandler said it would take action on the State level to requires insurance. LeFevere said he will look into the subject. Carlson stated he doss not believe it is reasonable to require insurance as a condition to snowmobile on Lake Minnetonka. 9 I LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 Agenda Amendment It was agreed to amend the agenda by considering item E to l be followed by the Advisory Committee Report. t E. FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Boswinkel 1) The Statement of Cash Transactions, month ending 1/31/91 was accepted and ordered filed. f" 2) Boswinkel moved, Babcock seconded, Approval of Vouchers for Payment in the amount of $16,132.00, Checks 6707 through 6749. Mvtion carried unanimously. C. ADVISORY, Foster for Chair Rascog C.f) and 2) Review Progress on Metropolitan Council Staff Report and Report on Meetings and Exchanges with LMCD Cities An initial meeting with Metropolitan Council staff assigned to facilitate the difference in the Long Term Management Plan was held February 5. About a week later LMCD was advised a different staff person was assigned. Jim Uitley, Senior Planner, was confirmed February 19. Uttley noted he would require about' two weeks to update himself on the Plan background and analyze the Metropolitan Council staff report of January 22. There was a meeting February 22 with the 6 Mayors of dissenting cities, and another meeting of all 14 cities is scheduled for March 6, 7.00 p.m. at the Wayzata City Council Chambers. The March 6 meeting may make it possible for the cities to rescind their resolutions objecting to certain segments of the Plan. Foster urged the Board members to read Babcock's response to Spring Park in regard to Appendix C. The Executive Director noted the March 6 meeting will he the first meeting since the Plan was adopted in October with all fourteen cities to share their concerns and Management Plan positions among themselves. Boswinkel commented that he feels there is a hard time coming to a conclusion on the broad issues raised because they lack specifics. The Executive Director responded that the Metropolitan Council facilitator, Jim Utley, wi.l be a positive influence to identify the specific problems. He will work on the Plan's language and look for contradictions. His approach will also involve a broad look on what is needed to best manage Lake Minnetonka. The Executives Director suggested a special meeting of the Board to discuss Management Plan issues resolution between now and the close of the 90 day extension period which expires May 4. Foster was hopeful the Mayors of the cities who have approved the Plan will attend the March 6 meeting, urging Directors to contact them in this regard. Babcock urged the Board members to address specifics to their City Councils. 10 LMCD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 C.3) MN DNR Response to Property Redevelopment as it Relates to Shoreland Rules Adoption The Board received a memo from Chair Cochran for the information of the Board. The memo has not been distributed to the cities because the MN DNR discussed this subject at the 2/22/91 meeting. The DNR is checking on its authority and will be sending a letter to the LMCD. The Shoreland Agreement has been signed by six cities. C.4) MN DNR Shoreland Grant Agreement ,?{ The Board received the amended MN DNR Shoreland Grant Agreement between the MN DNR, LMCD and fourteen cities as presented to the Board 12/22, and sent to the cities 12/29/90. The amended Agreement includes the addition of a Technical Review Committee, recommended at the joint City /DNR /LMCD Shoreland Rules meeting of 12/10/94. Rascop moved, Grathwol seconded, approval of the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Shoreland Grant Agreement as amended. Grathwol said this Agreement should be referred to a committee. He said the LMCD abrogates its authority to the cities by establishing a Technical Review Committee. Rascop said the LMCD has an obligation at this time to adopt this Agreement. Six cities have signed the Agreement and appointed people to serve on the Technical Committee. Babcock stated the Spring Park Mayor is questioning the Technical Review Committee, and the Agreement has been referred to their attorney. Foster asked whether the Board is compelled to act on the Agreement at this time. The Executive Director responded that the MN DNR expects LMCD is in full support of the Agreement. Six cities have moved on the Agreement, and it is incumbent upon the Board to act on its acceptance. Any other action would be a contradiction to all the communications and progress on its development and acceptance by a number of cities, more expected to accept it. The motion carried, Grathwol and Pillsbury voting nay. C.5. Resolution Specifying the Procedure for Amending the LMCD Long Term Management Program Foster suggesting taking a little more time to look at the procedures. Rascop moved, Grathwol secow"ed, to table the discur,asiori of the procedures for amending the LMCD long term Management Program until after the Metropolitan Council period for review passes. Motion carried, Foster, Reese, Slocum and Babcock voting nay. 11 LWD Board of Directors February 27, 1991 F KXECUTI'VE DIREC'r4R, Strommen 1) Performance Reviews Strommen reported he has had a preliminary discussion with Chair Cochran on the staff performance reviews, but that his performance review with the Executive Committee is still pending. z There will be a report at the March Board meeting along with recommended compensation adjustments. Strommen complimented the ,staff on their initiative and response to the priorities facing the District. 2) Office Equipment Boswinkel moved, Bjorl�n seconded, approval of the purchase of a Pitney - Bowes postage meter for $650., meter fees to be $29.`per month. Motion carried unanimously. Strommen reported he and Bookkeeper Muriel Stewart are investigating a so syst to handle the quarterly financial reports in house. Accountant Schibilla is advising staff on this plan. He supports it as practical for the size of the task. It will speed up the reports and result in some fee savings. Mansk, Thibault and Strommen have been taking computer courses to update their skills. 3) Solicitation Strommen distr.ibvted fund solicitation return reply envelope information planned for insertion in the summer rules brochure. It is aimed at t' smaller contributor, and in particular the lake user coming from outside the area. Distribution of the summer rules w;ll be expanded well beyond the public access boxes, lake , ommunities and bait shops. A mailing to all Lakeshore homes is being considered also to get the lake education material in the hands of the frequent user. Teri thousand copies are planned for distribution: 7. Unfinished Business There was no unfinished business to brim; before the Board. 8. New Business Coster distributed a lip-solution to be directed to the City Creenwood regarding their decision about Cochran's appointment. Coster moved, liascop seconded, adoption of the following Resolution: Resolve that in recognition of Dave Cochran's long experience and outstanding; leadership in Lake: Minnetonka matters and his excellent leaIe-ship as chairman of the LMCD, the Board of the LMCD requests toe City of Greenwood to reconsider Dave' Cochran as its appt�jintee to the LMCD for the term starting October 1991. Motion carrit ur.. inimously. 12 : 13 LAKE' M1 NNE TONKA CONSERVATION D I S T R I C T Action Report: watc:tr and Envi l' ,srmmit.t «.• Meeting: Saturd, -iy , March 9, 1991, 7:30 a.m. Norwest Bank. Wayzata, Community Meeeting Room Members Present: B ert Foster, beephav, -n; Ja111t3S tlrathwol Chair, Excelsior, David Cochran, Greenwood; Robert Pillsbury, Minnetonka; Thomas Reese, Mound Robert Rascop, Shorewood; Douglas Babcock, Vice Chair,Spring Park; Marvin B;iorlin, rorika Day, David Bartos, Victoria; Robert Slocum, Woodland. Also present: Charles LeFevere, Counsel; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting; was called to order by Grathwol at 7 :30 a.m. 1. flowers Variance To Establish a Dock Use Area During Low Water The Committee receiv the minutes and Findings of the Public Hearing held by t he Board February 27, 1991 to consider the request of J,: ttinie Bow . 21600 Fairview Street, Greenwood to establish a Dock Use Area -. (DUA) during lc)w water. A registered survey introduced by Bowt:frs at this meeting dated March 5, 1991 shows the Dowers property has a 66' width at the 929.4' O11WL lakeshure-. Joan Moser, 21670 Fairview Street, said their lot is 60' wide and the half section map seellis to show' less frontage on the Dowers property. Cochran said he, along with the Executive Director, measured the property on the site and they estimated close to 66' Tom Moser, 21670 Fairview Street, speaking for the neighbors, said all eight affected property owners are standing_ together against any variance. Hp said they cannot see why eight property owners have to sacrifice property value to accommodate one. They suggest continued sharing of a common dock by Bowers and they neighbor to the south, C. G. Schrock. It was understood Dr. Schrock is willing to continue the shared dock arrangement. Gale Stead, 21600 Fairview Street, Ms. Bowers' husband, said they have not. had arty communication from Dr. Schrock. Stead said they want t.o exercise their right to have their own dock. They will have one 21' boat on the dock. Schrock usually has two power boats, a moored sailboat and additional sailboats at his deck. .Mead said they have two acres of l ;Acrd, constituting a significant part; of the neighborhood. Several solutions were discussed. The Morris dock could be angled 10' to the north as the McCarthy deck it,, at they north edge of their property. Alternately all of the docks to 1,11(, so,..►th could be moved in a southerly direction. :Mead sugrestc:cl other residents to the south share their clock spare. It was pointed out that riparian means access to thr, water but does riot, infer tl►e right to a dock in all situati.�ris. Foster moved, Babcock seconded, to refer tine Bowers request' to staff to make a technical review o f the farts to #.stablish a solution or alternatives by working with thc> neighbro -5 as a temporary low water variance. Motion (_'arrie d. 1 Water Structures and Envi ronmont Committee March 9, 1991 The agenda was amended t(;) c ans idii r l'to4m 5 and 7 at the same time. 5. Proposed Ordinance Amendment 2.11 Conversion of U;:ae; (Chapman Place and Excelsior Bay Associates) 7. Discuss Policy for Adjustment: of flock Uss, Area LeFevere submitted a code amendment which he believes will solve the problems presented by the changes in ownership of the Excelsior Bay Associates (The Gables) and control of the Chapman Place Marina (formerly Surfside,). LeFevere's cover letter of March 4, 1991 explained that Excelsior Bay Associates" was originally a commercial marina located at a townhouse development, property. All dockage rights were owned by a corporation' operated for profit and the homeowners association had no ownership or control of the corporation. In 1986 the homeowners association acquired ownership of the business corporation which owned the marina with the knowledge at the time of purchase that this was contrary to the license. The City of Excelsior from the initial license application would not permit rental of the docks outside of the Homeowners Association. In fact, the docks have never served the public and have operated as an outlot facility. Chapman Place, originally Surfside Marina, has been operated as a commercial marina. When Chapman Place Condominiums were developed, the docks were licensed and independently operated as a commercial marina to retain the grandfathered excess density (29 slips on 140' of frontage). The dock rights were leased to an owner - operator. LMCD required that the docks remain available to the public and not limited to Chapman Place homeowners. In 1989 the owner /developer did not renew the lease. The homeowners association exercised an option with the operator and purchased the docks. This change in ownership increased the association's control over the marina operation. The association still leases the marina to an outside (- perator, but the operating contract is now more of a hands-on management agreement. The proposed code amendment redefines "Commercial Marina" and "Outl.ot Association" in terms of its operating characteristics rather than its ownership. The amendment imposes additional obligations and restrictions on commercial marinas and private clubs which are owned or operated by a homeowners' association. In addition there is a provision that in the event a majority of slip spaces are lea:uscd to homeowners for two consecutive years, the Board may impose additional conditions. Reese said he is still looking for a provision that will require the licensee to begin providing; amenities when a license is issued. He envisions a time when, because of the spread potential of Zebra Mussel, boats will be quarantined to one lake. At that time there would be a tremendous growth in marinas on Lake Minnetonka. Meese said he would rather grandfather Excelsior Bay Associ.ace5 and Chapman Place to their present - continued 2 i Water Structuros and lirav i rolkil com(lii t.U'lo H rr(: t!, density if, over tint, t.ht;y- w +,eald pr._)vide i t i , i fit i IaI: to commercial I11arinca5 . 011 thl'. suE jt-! t Pltac'tf , } {ee;se believes the c hange in operating procedure is a conversio of u56 and he would recommend they e ther f iced an owner - operator for the docks or go back to 1 : 50' density, Grathwol se(-;n requ i ri nf> of future anit"'Iai'tie's for a current operation as government interference with a private operation. On the subject of Excelsior Bay Associates, Grathwol said he does not believe it is a conversion of use a there has been no change in its operation since its inception. Babcock would, support the Ordinance as it establishes a definition on which to determine if a conversion of use exists. He believes it is important to prohibit transfer of slip rights when there is a change of ownership in an HOA. Foster asked the Committee to consider a scenario where a developer could buy a commercial marina, continuing the amenities. Subsequently the developer buys non- lakeshore property for a high density development and turns the docks over to a E}OA. It is conceivable that by riot advertising the docks as open to the public, the result would be loss of commercial dockage to the general public. Foster therefore opposes the Ordinance. LeFevere responded that the Ordinance should not be adopted if the LMCD cannot police any requirement that slips be allocated on the basis that there- is no discrimination between the FiOA and general public. In his opinion., if in the case stated by Foster, the developer were told to go back to 1:50' density, they would sue. }le estima'ed a cast of $15,000 to $20,000 to defend the LMCU action with a better than even chance of prevailing. In the Excelsior Day Associates carp he does not believe the odds of prevailing to be as good because the use has not changed, only the ownership of the stock. Grat hwol asked for a straw vote as to whether: a) The Committee wants to recommend adoption of the Ord inartce b) instruct Staff to rrt' classify Excelsior Ba A as 1tl outlot Association c) I nstruct Staff to inform Chapman Place they have a conversion of use. A show of } indicated the Ordinance does not have the support of the Commit.te ", there is support for allowing Excr;.lsior Bay Associates to continue as t)►e-y have been operating and to determine the Chapman ilac-_ changer in operation constitutes a conversion of use. Reese moved, PJor1, i.n set::ornded, that Chapman Place - be instructed to g +,,t an owrv- -'r - operator of the dock, set a time, two years, or go back to 1 density. During; the di se u:ssif5n }Zcnses ux ed adding; additional amenities to be administruLively re!quired. Grathwol responded t }tat, grandfather� -d commercial marinas have no obligation to provide amenities. Ar; Reerie and Bjor in afire f—. -d to withdraw their me,,t.ion. cr>nt,:nuf:�d 3 Water Structures acid Environmt--►►t cowmittt-e March it, 1991 Babcock moved. Slo st:!cotitied, to i Place to get an owner overator within two ytttrs, by the stal of Ulf 199.3 season, or lose thf�ir grandfathert--d status, tht ni<iriria then reverting back to 1:50' density per the code. Foster moved, Reese st. to amend the motion to direct Staff to discuss amenities to be added over time if Ghapilian Flace is to retain their 1:10' density. Motion to amend and the motion carried. LeFevere rioted that this amendmt:rit may require all grandfathered marinas to address adding amenities. Jerry Rockvam, Rockvam Boat Works, responded that lie sees li many marinas violating their lir e, stich as conducting , unauthorized dredging. He also 5ef howeowners renting docks in competition with marinas. Foster moved, Babcock seconded, that staff recommend a solution to the Excelsior Bay Associates license discrepancy, the Committee recognizing that Excelsior Bay Associate's change of stock ownership was not sufficient to result in improper ownership and therelore the existing operation be allowed. Motion carried. Grathwol commented that time is passing on the moratorium. The Committee has to have a rational set of recommendations by September, particularly a way to control the storage of boats around the lake. He said there is a need for a count of docks with more than three boats during June or July. The protection of wetlands will be part of the analysis. Grathwol said tinkering with the 1:50' rule would be a mistake. The Dock Use Area plays a role in the boat density issue. LeFevere discussed the idea of extending lot lines into the Lake. Lot lines extended into the Lake provide a certainty to DUA's. While there are other means of defining dock use areas, such as lines perpendicular to the shore, LMCD has resolved most DUA disputes over the past 20 years. Opening DUA's to a new system could re-open long - standing resolutions already in place. The occasional pie-shaped lot DUA conflict can be better resolved on an individual case basis. An earlier summary of DUA concerns by Frank Mixa dated 3/7/79 supported this rationale. Babcock moved, Pillsbury seconded, that the Staff and attorney strengthen the conversion of use ordinance by protecting amenities and public access when ownership changes. Motion carried unanimously. 3. 1991 Multiple Dock License Renewals Foster moved, Babcock seconded, to recommend approval of the 1991 multiple dock license renewal applications with orders, stipulations, other considerations as detailed in the Staff report dated 3/8/91, noting to add a stipulation to Sandy Beach Place temporary extension that no boat parking will be allowed at their 8' extension and no larger watercraft stored at slip 1. City certificates have been received or time has expired for responsps. Motion carried unanimously. 4 Wator Structuros anti Envir-onimint, Cortitnittltio march 9. 1991 2. The Harborage Side 'Sot-back Varianc(t The Committee rec--ived the mitiLites of the Public Hearing held on February 27, 1991 to considf-i The, for ` dock use area adjustmt-.�nt or for a nc--tback Tlka 0 taf f findings point to a side- st.-Lback variance, which w,-,tald 111-0.ro I es s effect on the neighbors. Foster moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approval of a double side setback variance on the northeast s.;de of The Harborage dock due to wind fetch hardship, because it has lea effect on the neighbors than a dock use area adjustment, to include minor change in dock configuration. Moti(: carried unanimously. 4. Channel Drive Homeowners Association (St. Albans Bay) Dredging The Execu"ive Director explained the history of the- Channel Drive Homeowners Association MN DNR, permit to dredge a channel on the east side of St. Alban's Bay. The City of Greenwood has asked the LMCD to support their petition to require the applicant to file a new dredging permit application to allow an analysis of the application relating to wetland obje:ctives of the Management Plan. Paul Haik, Attorney representing the Channel Drive Homeowners Association, coixid riot attend this meAirii- ;arid asked for a postponement to April. The Executive Director said his conversations with the MN DNR hydrologist find that the City of Greenwood is not likely to prevail in its attempt to have the dredging permit time extension rescinded. Cochran commented that the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is considering a moratorium on dredging. The Committee offered the services of the LMCD Beard and Staff to assist the applicant and City of Greenwood in resolving this issue. 6. Mission Statement for the Wetland Subcommittee It was reported Thib:.iult has been inventoryi.ne wetlands around Lake Minnetonka. It would be helpful if each Director looked at aerial photos in the area he/she has the most familiarity. It is P055 to eriter the wotlarids on the University of Minnesota GIS computer maps. The greatest difficulty is determining where the 929.4 OHWL is located as well as defining what comprises a wetland. 8. Update on Deicing Inspections Thibault has checked all deicinP locationr, at, least one time. The current problem is that in many areas the f,, have partially fallen down. The Minnetonka Boat Works (Orono) fence is fell down or. the north side, and they have turned the nearby bubbler off. Fluctuating tempera tU re,-s has made it hard to keep continued 5 1.A. Progress on Lakeshore Weed Pickup Program Development. Reese has met with the barge contractor, Bill Niccum, Minnetunka Portable Dredging, to review the contract arrangements. The proposed la' , shore weed pickup program will need widt-,! publicity if it is t accomplish its purpose. Niccum will be cooperative in assisting this program. Niccum has a concern abolit liability. involved with lakeshore residents bringing weeds to the barge for off-load. The volume of public response will determine what insurance provisions and controls might be required in Niccum's observation. 1. B. Response to Representative Kinkel's Bill Reese stated he does not favor the bill regarding funding for control of exotic weeds because it does not address the scope of the problem. The Exec-utive Director has spoke to Rep. Kinkel and was advised any amendments the LMCD wants to suggest be refered to Repr�:tseatatives Steve Smith and Ron Abrams. The bill should be in ct.,mmittee at tl.e legislature in about two weeks. 6 Wator Structures and Environm,!nt CoaLnittto March 9, 1991 the fences up- At t',e 14L ",hore Drive Miarina snowinul were knocking the fence down. 'rlit--y have placed reflectorized thin ice signs every 25' to mark off the deiced area. The sarli e f encin g problem exists at Shoreline Marina. Babcock moved, Pillsbury seconded, to direct the Staff to enforce LMCD deicitig reflitlations, with fencing to b.: replaced and/or suitable markings and bright colored surveyor's tape be placed between signs to indicate that the ice is thin. The Staff is to determine whether or not a licensee will be entitled to a deposit refund based upon inspection demands. Motion carried unanimously. 9. District Mooring Areas Review as They Relate to LMCD Policy Statement. The Committee received a list of LMCD District Mooring Area Licenses, the number of buoys, square footage of the DMA and distance from shore. Accompanying the list was a copy of the District Policy and Criteria for reviewing licenses. Grathwol said this raises the question was to whether the existing policy should be continued or changcd, There was no action at this time. 10- Communication from the Public The Executive Director reported a letter from Duane Markus Wayzata, asking for LMCD enforcement of a land covenant between the Wayzata Yacht Club Site 2 and previous owners. The Committee indicated this is not within LM(.D authority. ENVIRONMENT 1. Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force, Chair Reese 1.A. Progress on Lakeshore Weed Pickup Program Development. Reese has met with the barge contractor, Bill Niccum, Minnetunka Portable Dredging, to review the contract arrangements. The proposed la' , shore weed pickup program will need widt-,! publicity if it is t accomplish its purpose. Niccum will be cooperative in assisting this program. Niccum has a concern abolit liability. involved with lakeshore residents bringing weeds to the barge for off-load. The volume of public response will determine what insurance provisions and controls might be required in Niccum's observation. 1. B. Response to Representative Kinkel's Bill Reese stated he does not favor the bill regarding funding for control of exotic weeds because it does not address the scope of the problem. The Exec-utive Director has spoke to Rep. Kinkel and was advised any amendments the LMCD wants to suggest be refered to Repr�:tseatatives Steve Smith and Ron Abrams. The bill should be in ct.,mmittee at tl.e legislature in about two weeks. 6 Water Structures and Environment Committee March 9, 1991 1 . C. Operations Progress Reese reported contacts are being; made for cank.iiriates for field supervisor. Harvester operator candidates are also being invited. Adjournment There being no further business to brim; before the Committee, the meeting; was adjourned at 10:55 a.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE: Eugene Strommen, Executive Director James Grathwol, Chair Lakewind5 Association, Spring Park Bay - 98' extension, 198' total • 0 LAKE' tvIINNE]ONKACOI'J',')i.,FiVAI(t)r,4 I March 8, 1991 To: Do,:k Committee From: Staff Subject: 1991 Multiple Dock License Rv11f-%,;aJs The following multiple dock licensees have submitted applications for 1991 with orders, StipulaLiOIIS, t?tc. Village certificates have been received or time has expired for responses. A. RENEWALS WITHOUT CHANGE Minnetonka Portable Dredging, Gideons Bay B. RENEWALS WITH MINOR CHANGE Lord Fletchers Apartments, West Arm New Owner - Fred N. Puzak Mack's on Minnetonka (Formerly Pizzelli's), Seton Lake New Name, New Owner - iiill McNamee C. RENEWALS WITHOUT CHANGE, WITH TEMPORARY EXTENSIONS RENEWED WITHOUT CHANGE FROM 1990 Al & Alma's Supper Club, Cooks Bay Transient (locks - 16' extension, 116' total Charter boat dock - 24'exLension, 74' total Cochrane's Boatyards Inc. Excelsior Bay - 20' extension St. Albans Bay (110 extension) City of Deephaven, Carsons Bay - 24'extension, 164' total St. Louis Bay (no extension) City of Greenwood, St. Albans Bay - Site I -60'exLension, 147' LoLal Site 2 (no extension) Lower Lake South Site 3 (no extension) Lakewind5 Association, Spring Park Bay - 98' extension, 198' total • 0 r LAKE: M INN E ION KA C ON(A- --IIVAIIUN I) IS] 111( T Page 2 March 6, 1991 Multiple Duck License Renewals City of Mound, Priests, Cooks, West Upper Lake, Phelps, Black Lake, Emerald Lake, Seton Lake, Harrisons, Jennings & West Arm Bays free: letter) Rockvam Boatyards, Site I (new survey submitted) West Arm - main dock 85' extension, 296' total straight dock 76'extension, 245' total (Site 2 is connected to this dock) Rockvam Boa yards, Site 2 (new survey submitted) West Arm - 76' extension, 204' total West Beach Apartments, Coffee Cove - 96' extension, 176' total D. RENEWALS WITHOUT CHANGE, WITH TEMPORARY EXTENSIONS CHANGED FROM 1990 Eagle Bluff Homeowners Assn., Halsted's Bay -- 12' extension, 112'total with change in configuration Slip 5 (16'w)would be moved to the east of the main dock duce to shallow water an the west by Eagle Bluff Point Sandy Beach Place, West Arm - 40' extension, 96' total (last year they extended without application) Woodend Shores Beach Association, West Upper Lake - 30 extension, total 130 ' (last year's extension was to 127') E. NON RENEWING, PAYING ADMINISTRATIVE FEE; To HOLD LICENSE Upper Lake Minnetonka Yacht Club, South Upper Lesko CITY (A MOUND February 19, 1991 Ms. Rachel T'hibault Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 900 .Last Wayzata Blvd., Suite 160 Wayzata, MN 55391 SUBJ: Temporary Low Water Dock Extensions Dear Ms. Thibault: Because the municipal dock system of the City of Mound is made up of 443 docks, I cannot begin to list each site. Our dock inspector who visits each site up to four times per year will enforce all the requirements listed by the LMCD. If -you have any questions, please call 'Tom McCa €fery, Dock Inspector or myself. n rely. m Fackler Park Director JF:pJ Enclo;;ure: Low Water Variance Dock Extension Application CC: Tom McCaffery KEL r LAKE MINNETONKA CON.,ERVAT I ON D I STR t CT Action Report: Lake Use Committer heating: Monday, March 1b, 1991, 4:30 p.m. Community Room, Norwest Bank Building Wayzata lteatbers Present: Bert Foster, Vice Chair, Doe�Ai ive::,n; James Grathwol, Excelsior, Thomas Reese, Mound; Scott Carlson, Minnetrista. Also Present: Deputy Cliff Schmidt, Sheriff's Water Patrol; Richard Nelson, Minnesota B. A.,.S. State' Federation; Bud Miller; Rachel Thibault, Administrative Technician; Eugene Strommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Foster at 4 :35 p.m. I. Request for Slow Buoys at Halstead /Priest Bay Channel Thibault reported she has talked to Denis Bailey, Engineering Technician, Hennepin County Lake Improvement, He doer not favor adding slow buoys near Eagle Bluff because of the high buoy and labor cost. Bailey suggests moving the channel buoys out further on the Halstead Bay side and monitoring the area in the summer. Reese and Carlson, both users of the channel, do not see as need for the change. Carlson said there is a need to watch watercraft speed within 150' of the share. Foster moved, Reese seconded, to leave the buoys from Halstead Bay to Priest's Bay where they have been and ask the Water Patrol and Bailey to observe the area this summer. Motion carried unanimously. 2'_ City of Wayzata Getter Regarding Prohibiting Charter Boat Usage of Depot Docks The Committee received a letter, dated 3/5/91, from the City of Wayzata City Manager, Allan Orsen, indicating; the consensus of the Wayzata City Council is that the city should no lonfJt r issue permits to charter boats using the depot d(-)cks as a por-t of cell.. The letter stated that the city docks, includinff tlie Broadway docks, should not be listed as an authorized port of call on any LMCD charter boat application. The reason given is parking problems at the depot. The Executive Director distributed %lie draft of ii lfAter to the City of Wayzata offering LMCD assistance in exploring methods of solving the parking problem to avoid closing tlii.w, access to the Lake for the use of the public. Grathwol said he would like to see a copy of the Wayzata Council minutes and how they arrived at their d i :,.<�r►. Neese would like to see additional information on what drayn and times the parking problem existed. Foster questioned whothfr the City of Wayzata dock license included the amenity of providing, access to charter boats at their docks. continued 1 Lake Use Committee March 18, 1991.' The staff is to review the City of Wayzata deck license and obtain additional information from the City as to how they arrived at their decision. 3. Special Events 3.A. Now Applications for Approval 1) Dori Shelby U.S. Invitational Bass Tournament/Minnetonka Boat Works -- Sponsor 9/20/91, 9/21/91, 9/22/91 Thibault reported there has been a one year lapse in this Special Event and therefore it is being considered as a new application. Foster commented that he believes there have been speed problems in the past. He would want assurance that participants are aware of the 40 mph speed limit. The Executive Director said the organizers have a contestants' meeting prior to the tournament and Lake Minnetonka rules are explained at that time, Bud Miller said the boat operators are responsible for observing lake ordinances and to exercise good sportsmanship. The Don Shelby tournament will have people at every launching place to see that boats are cleaned of Take weeds upon leaving the Lake. Foster and Reese urged that wet wells, anchors and internal boat areas also be inspected. Participation is projected at 125; boats, 250 persons. Grathwol said he has an interest in receiving post tournament information on the fish census and attendance. Miller said they comply with MN DNR rules in that respect. He said the catch and release program has a 90% plus success as bass handle stress well. Foster suggested withholding the deposit refund until that information is furnished. Foster moved, Reese seconded, to recommend approval of a Special Event Permit to the Don Shelby U.S. Invitational Bass Tournament, sponsored by Minnetonka Boat Works, to be held 9/20 -; 22/91. Motion carried unanimously. 3.A.2j Minnesota B.A.S.S. State Federation Fishing Tournament, 9/5/91, 9/6/91,9/7/91 Richard Nelson, representing the BASS Federation, said their tournament is not for a money prize. It gill attract about 90 boats, 180 persons. He said over the past year they have been working with the Minnesota Sports Fishing Congress and MN DNR on the catch and release program. They have a funding project before the LCMR to determine the post-release survival rate. A certain number of bass will be implanted with a radio sensor to determine where the fish move after release. A week before the tournament implanted fish will be released. During the tournament an additional 20 adult fish will be released to be tracked. In the spring of 1992 a second capture and release - continued 2 .. Cake Use Committee March 1-8 , 1991 tournament will be held and those fish will t)t� t:r<a. k- rt f six months. The study is set up to run at the :, pmt: t i Ifitt aF, the tournament. The fish will have all exterrr -rl tnt Information will be posted around the Lake to let, the public know the fish are there and the procedures to follow in notifying cif a catch.. Nelson noted that there are not as marry bars« in the . Lek as might be thought. The same fish are cauclat ovcir yard - - 3r again. Nelson will furnish the District with the names of the individuals running the tracking study. Copies of the sturdy will be furnished to the LMCD. Nelson said the Federation is aware of the utai(tue- rul�;s and xegulations on Lake Minnetonka, As a result, the Federation adopted special rules for this tournament, Any competing boat in th�'ir tournament which is ticketed by the Water Patrol will be a disqualified for that day. They are concerned about tying up " accesses and will do everything possible to avoid it. Their r members are aware of the problem of carrying milfoil to other k A. lakes, The problem will be discussed at the pre_ tournament x t. meeting. Foster talked about the mixed message that is being given regarding members of the angling community not being concerned about the Eurasian Water Milfoil proliferation. Foster stressed the LMCU's desire that the lake be available to persons fishing s well as the boating public. Nelson said he has had conversations with a MN DNR fisheries manager who indicates there is no clear evidence that milfoil is harmful to fishing. At the same time they do not warat it spread from lake to lake. It is the belief of persons studying the problem that its sr )read cannot be stopped. The fisheries people wi riot encourage its spread. Miller said its spread could choke out fishing. That would not be an advantage' to the fishing public, but it does create a fish habitat. N:;Ison commented on the funding problem experienced by the LMCD, in its effort to harvest the weed. Nelson said that currently half of the State boating fund allocated for exotics control is being spent on purple Loose str.ife, which is not a water plant` Reese mentioned the proposed additional boat license fee for milfoil control. Miller said a bigger problem is the spread of the Zebra Mussel. Miller also said the Fow��r Squadron has indicated its support of the marking of milfoil f ields by a buoy. Foster moved, Reese seconded, to recommr,nd approval of a Special Event Permit for the Minnesota F3. A. S. S. State Frideration f ishing tournament to b - -- held 9/5 -7/91. Motion carried unanimously. 3.U. :Special Event Renewals The Committee was informed that the following :special Event Permit.:, have been renewed: 1) Lower Lake Minnetonka Consolidated Rar,s-, GrJiedule for Minnetonka, Shorewood and Wayzata Yacht Clubs and Lake Minnetonka Sailing School, May 4 to October 26. continue 3 Lake Use Comm ttoo March 18, IU91 2) Minnetonka Cros.:sinr windsurfing oti sailboards 6/8/91 3) Minnetonka Bass Club fishing tournament 6 /8 /91 4) American Scholarship Foundation bass tournament G/16/91 5) Mound Fireworks 6/23/31 • 4, Bid Results for 1991 Summer Rules Publication with the :lave the Lake Fundraising Enclosure The Executive Director reported that he has talked to three suppliers for the printing of the 1991 Summer Rules and the return mail envelope for Save the Lake fundraising. He has received one bid, two declines to bid. He is seeking an additional bid. It is a complicated printing process tecause of the five colors and special water -proof paper. The brochure will be available before the 'boating season starts. Reese objected to the check off options on the envelope solicitation flap. It is his feeling that offering options for the use of the contribution confuses the fund raising need. ;, He requested the funding to be directed to the EWM program only. Reese moved, Carlson seconded, to recommend that the fund raising envelope enclosure in the Summer Rules brochure be for Eurasian Water Milfoil control only. Motion carried unanimously. 5. Progress Report Regarding MN DNR Persona Watercraft Bill for An At: t. Fo�Ae -r reported that legislative sponsors have been obtained for the Till. Fie will follow its progress and will continue to recommend that the bill be amended to conform to the LMCD Code in the two areas of operating within 150' of another watercraft and prolonged operation in the same area. 6, MN DNR Proposed Amendments to the Boat and Water Safety Rules Thibault said the proposed amendments regarding DNR boat and water safety rules are generally for housekeeping and updating. T)eputy Schmidt said the amendment deletes the term "reflectorized when referring to registration numbers of watercraft. 7. MN DNR Proposed Adoption of Rules Governing; Res for Fish and Wildlife Illegally K.i.l led, Injured or Possessed The proposed rules governing fish and wildlife restitution valuf> €: was received. It was noted these fees are in addition to fines and penalties. The Committee found the report an informative commun ication. 8. Water Patrol Report The Committee received a summary of the the 1990 Hennepin f1'c.,,u11t;y Slieri f f ' s Water Patrol activity report prepared by Sgt Win. Chandl.pr. - continued 4 Lake Use Committee M,irc.;h 111, 1991 Grathwol noted I s ti►nt-1 and m�rc��y t. ir�f; f•:rct. ON L ik„ Minnetonka. It appears from the rep. , r•t t.hrit tilt .cic,�� arn�,�.uit c.�f patrol time ':s being spread over more lakes arld w.at r and the amount of time allocated to Lake Minnetonka dirnini.: lees. i2eef - , - ,e que 3tioned the pie chart data. Deputy 0(- Almidt !,:lid I.•:: was not involved in the preparation and could riot coalmorit. The Committee and staff will set a time to m eet with Sgt: Chandler to review the entire report and explain it more clearly . at the next Committee meeting, 10.' Hennepin Parks' Surface Water Use Regulation Grathwol noted that Hennepin Parks is adopting; ordinances controlling surface water use on lakes wholly within the boundaries of the Park District. Grathwol would like staff; to keep track of what the Park District is adopting. Foster suggested staff work with Suburban Hennepin Parks by advising them of the LMCD controls or ask there to exclude_ Erik Minnetonka. Schmidt commented that the 15 mile -per -hour spe,—d limit` on Steiger Lake is because of the lake's small siuP. Schmidt would like to see no gas motors c. any of the Suburban I]#- yrinepin Park lakes 11 Light at Priest's Bay Reese asked for a follow up on his pr }�Frious request regarding an intrusive sodium vapor light at F'rru: t' s Bay. 12. Temporary Dock Extensions - 3' Water Depth Limitation The Executive Director reported receipt of a communication from Jeff Fox, 5270 Howard's Point Road, Excelsior, expressing his concern that if he were to adhere to the LMi;D guidelines limiting the water depth for a temporary dock exterision to 3' it would require moving the dock out later in the year at a greater expense. Foster commented that he would favor a 4' depth in the spring, within thirty days of ice out, because the lake typically goes dawn over the summer. Carlson said statistics introduced at the February 27th Board meeting indicated that the water level held up from spring through summer over the past five years. Grathwol suggested obtaining the water levels for tho past few years from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. It wxs noted that this is a Water Structures concern but, because the next Committee meeting isn't until mi d-Apri l , staf f wanted to address the issue before decks are installe -d starting with ice -out in April. Grathwol suggested this is a matter that staff has to enforce with the 3' being a ' normaI" and riot necessarily absolute depth. Staff will be expected to use the flexibility the, have had in the past. 5 Lake Usti Comm tte p 13. Adjournment Font'�r moved, Carlson sec Qndec , adjourned. Motion carried unanimously 5:40 p. r�- FOR THE COMMITTEE Eugene Str Executive Director Harc h 10, 1991 that_ ttt I ting L� Meet ing adiOUrned at. Robert Pillsbury, Chair • [1 LAKE. MINN ETON KA CONSERVATION DI5' HIGH {) 0 v. 0 A BOARD OF DIRECTORS Rf� MAR 2 5 1991 AG1gNDA Regular Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 77, 1991 Tonka Bay City Hall 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19) Call to Order Roll Call Reading of Minutes: 2/27/91 Public Comments - from persons in attendance not on agenda Chair Report, Vice Chair Foster for Chair Cochran A. Ice -out projections for 1991 B. Additional announcements Cocsfittee Reports A. WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Grathwol 1. Minutes for approval, meeting of .' /9/91 2. Bowers public hearing report on variance application to establish a V temporary low-water dock - use -area, as recommended Chapman Place, recommendation to secure owner - operator within two years or lose grandfathered status, amended to have staff discuss adding amenities over time to retain 1:10' density 4. Multiple dock license, 1991 renewals, recommending approval with orders, stipulations, temporary low water variances and other considerations per staff report of 3/8/91, (a) with added stipulation to Sandy Beach Place; and (b) adding Methodist Lakeside recommended by committee 2/9/91 subject to water depth readings 5. Harborage Homeowners Association public hearing report on variance applicatiop, recommendation to allow a variance from the double side setback and recommending a minor dock configuration change due to wind fetch hardship 6. Deicing regulation enforcement during late season periodic thaw recom- mending fencing to be replaced and /or suitable thin -ice markings and bright color surveyor's tape be placed between signs to warn of thin ice; staff to determine deposit refund eligibility based upon inspec- tion requirements during period of operation 7. Methodist Lakeside's District Mooring Area and temporary low water variance application recommended by committee 2/9/91 subject to receipt of site plan for temporary low water variance 8. Other business recommended by the committee LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTHICT O AJ BOARD OF DIRECTORS � Rf : MAR e2' 5 ,991 A G K N D A Rego: ar Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, March 27, 1991 Tonka Bay City Hail 4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19) Call to Order' Roll Call Reading of Minutes: 2/27/91 Public Comments - from persons in attendance not on agenda Chair Report, Vice Chair Foster for Chair Cochran A. Ice -out projections for 1991 B. Additional announcements Committee Reports A. WATER STRUCTURES, Chair Grathwol 1. Minutes for approval, meeting of 3/9/91 2. Bowers public hearing report on variance application to establish a temporary low -water dock - use -area, as recommended 3. Chapman Place, recommendation to secure owner- operator within two years or lose grandfathered status, amended to have staff discuss adding amenities over time to retain 1:10' density 4. Multiple dock license, 1991 renewals, recommending approval with orders, stipulations, temporary low water variances and other considerations per staff report of 3/8/91, (a) with added stipulation to Sandy Beach Place; and (b) adding Methodist Lakeside recommended by committee 2/9/91 subject to water depth readings 5. Harborage homeowners Association public hearing report on variance application, recommendation to allow a variance from the double side setback and recommending a minor dock configuration change due to wind fetch hardship 6. Deicing regulation enforcement during late season periodic thaw recom- mending fencing co be replaced and /or suitable thin -ice markings and bright color surveyor's tape be placed between signs to warn of thin ice; staff to determine deposit refund eligibility based upon inspec- tion requirements during period of operation 7. Methodist takeside's District Mooring Area and temporary low water variance application recommended by committee 2/9/91 subject to receipt of site plan for temporary low water variance 8. Other business recommended by the committee LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVAI ION DISI'n1C LMCD Board Agenda 3 -27 -91 3. d. Time projection for completing Long-Term Management Pry ram within 90 day extension provided to Met Council, due to expire May 4, and consideration to authorize LMCD Chair to extend Met Council review period an additional 90 days if review progress with cities, agencies, and Met Council requires more time e. Consultant Arndorfer overview on direction of Long -Term Management Program resulting from current review process f'. Additional business recommended by the board E. FINANCIAL REPORTS, Treasurer Boswinkel 1. Statement of Cash Transactions, month ending 2 /28/91 2. Audit of Vouchers for Payment 3. LMCD annual audit progress F. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, Strommen 1. Performance evaluation of LMCD staff 2. Administrative progress G. OFFICERS REPORT, PERSONNEL REVIEW, Vice Chair, Foster 1. Performance evaluation of executive director 2. Compensation adjustment recommendations for part and full time staff for fiscal year 1991, effective 1/1/91 Unfinished Business New Business Adjournment • 3 -21 -91