Loading...
1991-06-11 CC Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL PACKET - NKMIMI SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE. PG. 6. CUB X91+ -016: TOM REESE, 5641 BARTLETT BLVD., PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 23, PID #23- 117 -24 14 0003 1417 -1427 180938T: FRONT YARD SETBACK VARIANCE. PG. 1428 -1435 (This item will be before the Planning Commission on June 10, 1991.) 7. DOWNTOWN MOUND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT - RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT TEAM. PG. 1436 -1439 8. RESOLUTION URGING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO ADOPT A LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX. PG. 1440 -1460 9. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. 10. APPROVAL OF A POLICY PROMOTING THE USE OF MATERIALS WITH RECYCLED CONTENT IN PUBLICLY FUNDED CONSTRUCTION AND REMODELING PROJECTS. PG. 1461 -1466 11. LICENSE RENEWALS. PG. 1467 12. FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST - 1990 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT - NORTHWEST MECHANICAL - $2,099.30. PG. 1468 -1469 Page 1387 A. Department Head Monthly Reports for May, 1991. . Pg 14094-1523" B. L.M.C.D. Representativets Monthly Report for May 1991. Pg. 154�► � C. L.M.C.D.'s 1991 Proposed Budg P 9 P# 15ii�g D. L.M.C.D. Mailings. Pg. 101 � T. <} Letters from Ridgedale YMCA announcing that Chief of Police Len Harrell and Officer {^ Steve Grand have received the Red Triangle Award for YMCA Community Service to Youth 4 and the Scott Howell Plummer Award. Pg. 1634 -1�3 F. Letter dated May 28, 1991, from Westonka Schools announcing the Annual Community services Meeting regarding their budget and programs. It, is scheduled for Monday, June 10, 1991 7 :30 P.M., District Lecture Hall of the Westonka Community Center. Pg. 1536 G. Memo from Len Harrell, Police Chief, Re: U.S. Supreme County Ruling on 48 Hour Judicial Review for Incarceration. Pg. 1537 H. Population growth of Hennepin County cities bet*een 1930 and 1990. Pg. 1538 I. Planning Commission Minutes of June 4, 1991, Pg. 1539 -1542 J. Meeting Summary of May 29, 1991, Meeting of L.M.C.D. Member Cities. pg. 1543 -1544 Page 1388 CONTINUED FROM MAY 14, 1991 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Board of Review reconvened in the Council Chambers of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, at 5341 Maywood Road, in said city on May 28, 1991, at 7:30 PM. Persons present: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Ken Smith. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., Deputy City Clerk Linda Strong, Hennepin County Assessor Keith Rennerfeldt and Hennepin County Appraiser Bill Davy, and the following interested citizens: John T. Huber, Willard Morten, Lavon Cooper, and Frank Ahrens. Mayor Smith opened the reconvened Board of Review and introduced Keith Rennerf eldt, Assesor for Hennepin County and Bill Davy, Appraiser for 'Hennepin County. Keith stated that they had spoken with everyone who appeared before the Council on May 14, 1991, and he was presenting the county's decisions as to the value of the properties questioned. The property owner could appeal the county's decision at the Hennepin County Board of Review on June 17, 1991. The county must be notified prior to appearing. 1. PID 013- 117 -24 31 0031 - C.D. KOPPLIN, 2132 OVERLAND LANE The Assessor recommended reducing the value of this property from $123,900 to 0117,500. 2. PID #13- 117 -23 23 0145 - HAROLD KUTZNER, 4653 CARLOW ROAD The Assesor recommended reducing the value of this property from $152,000 to $145,000. 3. PID 013- 117 -24 14 0002 - J A P COMPANI HUBER FUNERAL HOME JOHN HUBER, 1801 COMMERCE BLVD. The Assessor recommended no change in this property - $75,000 residential and $185,000 for commercial. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Jensen and carried unanimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 4. PID #23- 117 -24 14 0130 - CHAPMAN PLACE ASSOCIATION, 2670 COMMERCE BLVD, G.ALLAN WEST, VICE PRESIDENT The Assessor recommended reducing the value on this property from $136,000 to $100,000. MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Jessen to accept the Assessors recommendation. The vote passed 4 to 1; Smith voting no. 1 1,387 86 May 28 1991 5. PID 013- 117 -24 44 0076 - PHILLIP A EVA HASCH, 4800 NORTHERN ROAD The Assessor recommended no change on this property - *47 MOTION by Smith, seconded by Jessen, and carried unanimously to accept the Assessors recommendation. 6. PID 012- 117 -24 43 0069 - GENE BRISTOL, 5140 WOODLAND ROAD (LOT ON CANARY) The Assessor recommended reducing the value of this property from $15,000 to $10,000. MOTION by Jedsenq seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 7. P10 01- 11T -24 21 0013 - WILLARD MORTON, 13140 CHOMEN AVENUE SOUTH, N212Y MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55416 (1660 AVOCET LANE) The Assessor recommended no change from $25,000. Council y discussed. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by "Smith to reduce the value of PID 613 - 117 -24 21 0013 from 625 to $20 The vote was carried unanimously. 8. PIN 012- 117 -24 43 0036 - RONALD MOT?cA, 1545 BLUEBIRD LANE The Assessor recommended no change on, the value of this property $140 MOTION by Smith, seconded by Jessen, and carried unanimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 9. PID R23- 117 -24 13 0064 - JIM ZUCCARO, 4190 HIGHVOOD ROAD (2625 GROVE LANE) The Assessor recommended a reduction in the value of this property from $48,900 residential to $15,000 land. NOTION by Smith, seconded by Jessen, and carried unanimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 10. PID /19- 117 -23 31 0119 - BRUCE RENO, 2851 TUXEDO BLVD. The Assessor recommended no change - $72,100. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Smith and carried unanimously 41 to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 6 47 2 11 PID 030 - 117 -23 22 0008 - FRANK & ANDREA AHRENS, 4673 ISLANDVIEW DRIVE The Assessor recommended no change $151,800. Council discussed this property on commons not private lakeshore, being market valued as private lakeshore. NOTION by Jensen, seconded by Smith to reduce the estimated market value on the land of PID #30- 117-23 22 0008 from $151,#O0 to 8146,500. The vote carried _3 to I. Smith, - Johnson and Je63en voted yea, Jensen voted no and Ahrens abstained. 12. PID 023-117-24 23 0034 - JAMES LONG, 2651 HALSTEAD LANE The Assessor recommended no change $129,800. 13. PID 024 - 117 -24 24 0002 - AL SCHVINGLER, 5301 BARTLETT BLVD The Assessor recommended no change $166 9 500. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Smith and carried unanirously to accept the Assessor's recommendation on PID 023- 117 -23 24 0034 and PID #2e- 117 -24 24 0002. 14. PID 013 - 117 -24 44 0077 - RICHARD MALONET, 1315 BLUFF CREEK CHASKA, MN 55318 (4045 EDGEWATER DRIVE) The Assessor recommended reducing from $70,000 to $65,000. NOTION by Smitb, seconded by Jessen and carried unanimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 15. PID 025- 117 -24 11 0128 - BRIGID KEIFER, 4849 HANOVER ROAD The Assessor recommended reducing this value from $99,900 to 193,000. MOTION by Jessen, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 16. PID 018 - 117 -23 32 0025 TOM A JUDT ESS, 2043 LAKESIDE LANE The Assessor recommended no change - 1578,0000 MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Jessen and carried unanimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation. 17. PID 025- 117 -24 21 0107 - Clifford Whitehill, 5330 Piper Rd. The Assessor recommended reducing the value from $130,200 residential to $126,600 seasonal. 3 1311 Council discussed studying property on city commons and the estimated market values at a future meeting. The Mayor closed the Local Board of Review at 9:40 PM. /31;L 4 $B May 28, 1991 MOTION by Jeasen, seconded by Jensen and approved uasnimously to accept the Assessor's recommendation to reduce from $130,200 residential to $126,600 seasonal. 18. PID #13 -117 24 32 0097 - LAVOR ALTCE COOPER 2241 SOUTHVIEW LANE (2122 BELMONT LAME) The Assessor recommended no change - $95 19. PID #13- 117 -24 32 0093 - SUTAS VANWATAMAKOOL 5365 CULVER ROAD, GOLDEN VALLET, (2152 BELMONT LANE) The Assessor recommended no change - $95 20. PID #13r- 117 -24 32 0096 - THOMAS RICHES, 5365 CUL#ER ROAD GOLDEN VALLET, (2128 BELMONT LANE The Assessor recommended no change - $95,000 21 PID #13- 11T-24 32 0088 - THOMAS 0. SHAND 2131 BASSWOOD 4M. The Assessor recommended no change - $95,000. 22. PID #13- 117 -24 32 0089 - JOHN LEWIS, 2139 BASSWOOD LANE. The Assessor recommended no change - $ 95,000 23• PID #13- 117 -24 32 0090 -► RONALD SMELIC, 2145 BASSWOOD LA. The Assessor recommended no change - $ 95,000. 24. PID 13- 117 -24 32 0091 - DANNY PETERSON 2153 BASSWOOD LANE The Assessor recommended no change - $ 959000. 25. PID 013- 117 -24 32 0092 - TIMC HY BOISJOLIE, 2161 BASSWOOD The Assessor recommended no change - $97,800 26. PID 013- 117 -24 32 0094 - MARK RUSTAD, 2142 BELMONT LANE The Assessor recommended reducing this property from $95,000 to $88,000. 27. PID f13- 117 -24 32 0095 - DAVID H. MESS, 2136 BELMONT LANE The Assessor recommended no change - #95,000 Smith moved and Jeasen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION t91 -68 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ENTIRE ASSESSMENT ROLE AS PRESENTED AND AMENDED The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried . Council discussed studying property on city commons and the estimated market values at a future meeting. The Mayor closed the Local Board of Review at 9:40 PM. /31;L 4 • 89 May 28, 1991 1 E NINUTES - CITY COUNCIL MEETING - NAT 28 1991 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, May 28, 1991, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Maywood Road, in said City. Those present were: Mayor Skip Johnson, Councilmembers Andres Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jensen and Ken Smith. Also present: City` Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., Building Official ` Jon Sutherland, City Attorney Jim Larson, City Planner Mark Koegler, Deputy Clerk Linda Strong and the following interested citizens: Bernard Gaudette, Steve Swenson, Marti Drey, Mark Hanus, .tack Cook, Oswin Pflug, John Gonzales and Tom Nichols. Also present were representatives of the Laker, Sailor and Weekly Dews newspapers. The Mayor opened the meeting with the pledge of allegiance. 1.1 NI NOTION by Jensen, seconded by Smith and c4arrlod unanimously` to approve the minutes of the May 14, 1991 and the minutes of tb* Nay 21, 1991 Committee of the Mhole meeting. 1.2 puBt N AI NS; Q LINQUEdTUTILI.TY RTLcs City Manager Ed Shukle informed Council of the adjusted amount owing on delinquent utility bills is 57 The Mayor opened' the public hearing asking if there was anyone present who wished to speak on this item. There was no one. He closed the public hearing and turned the item back to the Council. The following resolution was moved by Jensen and seconded by Jensen: RESOLUTION 891 -69 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE ANOUNT OF $7,338.39 AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SHUT OFF WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS. 1.3 City Planner Mark Koegler updated the Council on this item. Staff recommends that the side yard setback variance for the principal structure and existing accessory building (garage) be approved subject to the following findings and conditions: 1. The Planning Commission finds that a condition of practical difficulty exists in the strict -interpretation of the Zoning Code relative to this property. 2. A side yard setback variance of 1.79 feet is hereby granted 5 /15 13 90 Nay 28 1991 for the addition of a second story and an addition to the south side of the existing home With the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, non - conforming use, subject to all of the provisions of the Zoning Code. 3• A front yard setback variance of 9.49 feet is hereby granted for the existing accessory building- garage with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, non- conforming use, subject to all of the provisions of the Zoning Code. It is possible to eliminate the need for a lakeshore setback variance through the demolition of a portion of the existing structure, this 'is to be done prior to and inspected by the building official before any reconstruction. The existing detached garage is to be removed from the property within two years from the date of approval of the variance. Oswin Pflug, 4440 Denbigh Road, and Jack Cook, a neighbor, were present and spoke regarding this item. Council withdrew the recommendation that Mr. Hams be required to apply for a co =ons dock permit as this is City owned land, but not designated commans. The Council will study this. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #91 -70 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR VITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO RECOGNIZE EIISTING NONCONFORMING SETBACKS LOT I BLOCK 1 ATALON, PID 19- 117 -23 24 0001 (44411 DENBIGH ROAD The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • 1.4 CME NO .91 -01 REOU S FOR MINOR S U DIVTSIa9_ Ea t FDA W r BLYL, Building Official Jon Sutherland updated Council on this item. The Planning Commission recommends approval with the condition that an .updated survey be submitted for each lot including all structures on site. Jessen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 091 -71 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR LOT 39 BLOCK 2, MESTMOOD, PID 023- 117 -24 23 0014, PZ 091 -010 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. /3!y 6 w 91 Ma 28, 1991 1.5 CASE JW..- 91=015 8 1.0"Ujuyj 0 .8... TBO BICHfl LS 4467 YILSHIRE LY8 D. _ L011 1 29 Us 14 20 21. 22. 1�-U2 - 11.0. B1+mP -A46 ..M AL 26 .. : pllta *S 24- 11T -24 14 001S�.SttL4 a5Zj952. L 41-01fil 6164 Hr. Nichols is seeking approval of a minor subdivision to create two lat39 both of which w ill have d lakesho separated by Wilshire blvd. The Planning Commission r ecommended approval upon several conditions: 1) The applicant shall combine parcels a end D and shall also combine parcels B and C. 2) The applicant shall either remove a portion of the deck on the west side of the existing hose or relocate the lot dine separating Parcels A and B . In order to create a two foot distance between the property Tine and the edge of the deck. If the applicant elects to relocate the lot line,, a new survey and corresponding legal descriptions will geed to be submitted to the City of Mound prior to the filing of the subdivision with Hennepin County. 3) A 5.5 foot Variance is hereby issued for the existing front yard setback for the existing structure on Parcel 9 with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of the Mound Zoning Code. The applicant stated he would cut back the deck to need the required two foot setback. Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 091 -72 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR LOTS 12, 13 14 20 21 22 23 A 112 OF 22, BLOC[ 8 IM AMR AND BLOCK 26 IN WYCHWOOD, PID #24- 117 - 14 0015 0046, 0057, 0052, i 41 0163 A 0164 AT 4967 WILSHIRE BLVD., P A Z 091 015 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. ENTS AND SUGGE CITIZENS PRESENT There were none. 1.6 APPROVAL 1491 COMMUNITY 3 YMj.CjjA-2AjjAQ .GBA Q LIFEGUARD SERVICES AGREEMENT Council discussed the program. They will request a report from the Parks & Open Space Commission subcommittee during the year. Motion by Smith, seconded by Jensen and carried unanimously to approve the 1991 Community Services Parks Program and Lifeguard Services Agreement. 7 /3 is MOTTxA T INSTALL A LIGHT ON WAURIKA COMMONS AT. DOCK SITE 001530 ABUTTING 1545 BLUEBIRD LANE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.9 $ U MUTION TO ARPROVE A CONSTRUCTION MLpUBLIC LAND PERMIT ABUT2S11"l EIDUBT AT Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 191 -75 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT FOR STEVE SWENSON TO REPLACE A STAIRWAY AND INSTALL TWO NEW RETAINING WALLS ON DEVON COMMONS ABUTTING HIS PROPERTY AT 4865 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE 1311, 8 92 f May 28. 1991 F 1.7 ZZ OLM TD. APPROVE A , CQ11aSTRUCLL ON PUBLIC LAND PERM FOR 610) Z ALES TO CONSTRUCT A ATAXUAX, ON VAURIZA rag- OAT,_ Mr. Gonzales stated that With the high lake water, access to his K dock over the beach area is gone. He watts to construct stairs to go over the rip rap and Will conform to building codes. Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION i91 -73 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION OM' PUBLIC LAND PERMIT FOR JONI GONZALES TO CONSTRUCT A STAIRWAY ON WAURIKA COMMONS, AT DOCK SITE - 102180. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.8 2=01TON .. TO APP. tE... A..CQMSTRUIM jQj-ZVfiL C..LA ..PF. 100 NOTIEA = TALL A L fiff J - CANNONS Ar t. ..I -02—VANU S3T #01538 A81=1ya_IS4%.BLUFAIRD LAN The Park Coamission recommended approval. Council added that the glare from the light Rust be minimal and installed according to the building official. Smith moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RES.UTION p91 -74 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT TO BON O MOTTxA T INSTALL A LIGHT ON WAURIKA COMMONS AT. DOCK SITE 001530 ABUTTING 1545 BLUEBIRD LANE The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.9 $ U MUTION TO ARPROVE A CONSTRUCTION MLpUBLIC LAND PERMIT ABUT2S11"l EIDUBT AT Ahrens moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 191 -75 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION ON PUBLIC LAND PERMIT FOR STEVE SWENSON TO REPLACE A STAIRWAY AND INSTALL TWO NEW RETAINING WALLS ON DEVON COMMONS ABUTTING HIS PROPERTY AT 4865 ISLAND VIEW DRIVE 1311, 8 e 93 May 28, 1 991 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. T.D,TES 624 g2 TO 624.52 City Manager stated the legislature had repealed MN. Statutes '624.42 to 624.52 which is referred to in the Mound Ordinance Section 45.0. Councilmember Jensen asked that the wording to gender be changed to non gender. !lotion by Jensen and seconded by Smith and carried unanimously to adopt the following ordinance: ORDINANCE 47!1991 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 450:10 OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO DANCE HALLS; LICENSING OF LIVE MUSIC; REPLEALING SECTION 450 :25 1.11 APIAN_AL OF POLICY caNn N 13N0L1Nfi ,U cRRTATm Ste. QVNED u,ltmitso on OTHEMilsir CONT80 C TTTES AND ALL TEHICY.E`U City Manager Ed Shukle stated that this was the policy the Smoking Committee had the majority vote. Council discussed briefly. Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION P91 -T6 RESOLUTION ADOPTING SMOKING POLICY FOR THE CITY OF MOUND " FACILITIES AND VEHICLES The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.12 p TRENT OF BILLS MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Smith and voted unani■ously through a roll call vote, to authorize payment of bills as presented on the pre -list in the amount of $200,676.08, when funds become available. Aflb ON ITBMS PA_ OF TSLAND PARK GARAGE 1.13 AINTING Council was presented with specifications from the City and quotes from painting companies to repair and paint the Island Park garage. Discussion centered on the range of repairs and painting and the cost to accomplish this task. 9 1,317 94 May 28 1991 MOTION by Jensen, seconded by Ahrens and carried unanimously to reque3t new quotes on power washing, crack filling and painting the Island Park garage. MPT A GREEN SPAS Counoilmember Phyllis Jensen reported that 36 sites have been adopted and all the planters in the parks have also been adopted.< .` The downtown planters are still available for adoption. 1.13 INFO IOUNISCRI-LaN9eDg A. Monthly Financial Report for April 1991 as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director B. L.M.C.D. Mailings C. Complimentary letter written to city staff from Mike Looby, Community Education & Services Director D. Minutes of the May 9, 1991 Parks and Open Space Commission E. Minutes of the May 13, 1991 Planning Commission F. Letter dated May 23, 1991 from Representative Steve Smith on "Why I Voted No on New Taxes" MOTION by Smith, seconded by Ahrens, carried unanimously to ajourn the meeting. The meeting adjourned at 11:31. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Attest: City Clerk 10 !39$ a PROPOSED RESOLUTION Case No. 91 -013 RESOLUTION #91- RESOLUTION TO APPRI E PLANK I N(i CONN I SS I ON RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW THE MOVING OF A DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING ( GARAGE ) FRO" CUTS I DE THE C I TV . OF , TO 5724 LYW40W BLVD„ PART OF LOTS 21 A 22 LYN111'1l.D PARK, LAKE MINNETOWA, PID 014 - 117-24 44 001'8 (P Z CASE NO. 51 -013) WHEREAS, the applicant has requested approval to move a detached garage from outside the City of Mound to 5724 Lynwood Blvd., Part of Lots 21 and 22, Lynwood Park, Lake Minnetonka, PId #14- X117 -24 44 0010, and; WHEREAS, the property at which the garage is to be moved to (5724 Lynwood Blvd.) is located within the R =3 One and Two Famiiy Zoning District, and, WHEREAS, Section 300:25 regulates criteria for the reloca- tion of structures in the City of Mound, and WHEREAS, The Planning. Commission has found the proposed location of the garage to meet all zoning and setback regula- tfons. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval. The Planning Commission agrees that the structure is of the same general character and appearance es other buildings or structures in the vicinity, and; WHEREAS, when a structure is moved or relocated, it must conform to the requirements for a new structure under the provi- sions of the Uniform Building Code, 'State of Minnesota, Section 104, except for the current energy code requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, to approve the relocation of the sub- ject 22' x 24' detached accessory building (garage) to 5724 Lyn- wood Blvd., iegaiiy described as: The South 220 feet of Lot 21 and the East 112 of the South 220 feet of Lot 22, " Lynwold Park," Lake Min - netonka, PID #14- 117 -24 44 0010, Approval is contingent upon the condition that all aspects of the subject structure must meet all applicable Zoning, City and Building Code requirements. •13,7? MINUTES OF A NESTING 07 THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 13, 1991 CANS NO 91-013t Non A Barb BorKes. S224 Lyugga - 2 1YAL4 -gart .. .; sP Lgaragal ! (mITLML gas p12 t n. Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the a licanta request for a permit to :allow a 22* x 24 detached accesses building to be moved onto his pro ert The p Y proposed 96r' 90 location will meet all setback requirements, it will be jo feet from the north front property line, 15 feet from the west side, Ty and 36 feet to the east side. Staff has conducted the required inspection of the garage and has determined it is in substantial compliance with the Builds a City Code, with the exception of some additional bracing o tm0 rafters is needed and a treated sill plate will be required to be Y installed Staff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit to alloy the applicant to move in the 22' x 24 detached accessary buile- ing with the condition that all aspects of this structure must meet all applicable Zoning, City and Building Code requirements. Chair Beyer opened the public hearing. There being no comments, Chair Mayer closed the public hearing. There was some discussion by the Commission relating to the sur- vey, should a revised survey be required? The Building official recommended that if the property markers at the north property line are located this would be sufficient considering the applicant does have an existing survey and there is a two foot lee -way from the required setback to the north and the other set- backs exceed the minimum setbacks required. MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Sanus, to approve staff recommendation for approval. Motion carried i to 1. Those in favor were: Weiland, Thal, Meyer, Jensen, Manus, and Michael. Mueller was opposed. Mueller commented on his reason for opposing. He stated that the proposed location of the garage could have been better, possibly further from the north property line. Qb This case will be heard by the City Council on June 11, 1991. x P MAYW- CITY of N 10UND PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CITY OF MOUND { MOUND, MINNESOTA ,r. NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO 'CONSIDER A PERMIT TO MOVE A DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING INTO THE CITY OF MOUND AS REQUIRED BY CITY CODE SECTION 300;25, SUED. 3, AT 5724 LYNWOOD BLVD. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet in the Council Chambers at Mound City Hall, 5341. Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota at 7 :30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 11, 1991 to consider the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a detached accessory building to be moved into the City of Mound at 5724 Lynwood Blvd., legally described as follows: The South 220 feet of Lot 21 and the East 1/2 of the South 220 feet of Lot 22, " Lynwold Park," Lake Minnetonka. PIb #14- 117 -24 44 0010. The structure proposed to be moved is currently located at 13922 91st Street NE., Elk River, Minnesota. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard Francene C. Clark, C ty Clerk- Published in "The Laker" May 27, 1991. Mailed to abutting property owners within 350' by May 31, 1991. O/ v t ,91� s9 cs. ./; ' D MOUND, MINNES&A 56W (612) 42-1155 STAFF REMRT ' DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of May 13, 1991 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official CASE NO.: 91 -.013 APPLICANT: Ken and Barb Berres LOCATION 5724 Lynwood Blvd. LEGAL Part of Lots 21 & 22, Lynwood Park DESCRIPTION: PID ##14- 117 -24 44 0010 SUBJECT: Moving Building (Garage): Conditional Use Permit ZONING: R -3 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant is seeking a conditional use permit as required by City Code Section 300:25 in order to allow a 22' x 24' detached accessory buildi to be moved onto the subject. property. The existing garage is to be removed with the newer garage placed generally in the same area. As proposed, the garage doors open to the side lot l i n e with a 10 foot setback to the l ot 1 i n+e at the alley. A minimum 8 foot setback is required. CX "ENn Staff has conducted the required inspection of the garage and has determined it is in substantial compliance with the Building and City Code. With the exception of some additional bracing to the rafters is needed and a treated sill plate will be required to be installed. 1, EQ MMENDATICNfi Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow the applicant to move in the 22' x 24' detached accessory build- ing with the conditions as listed above. In addition, all aspects of this structure must meet all applicable Zoning, City and Building Code requirements. NOTE This case will be heard by the City Council on June 11, 1991. A public hearing notice was mailed to property owners within 350' 'y�' of the subject property on April 29, 1991. ORftNA M 00. 97-1949 by ORDIWAICS LUMDINO SaCTION 1001 =!, OD• 3 of Tu CITY can UtATIMfi TO DOILDINq NOTING 9i�ra The City of hound Does ordain: Section 300:25, Subd. 3, of the City Cods is amended to read as follows: Subd. 3. oonforaits of muilaiee er struotnre t •+iai structure snail be 1Movs4 0 a location within the City unless it will conform to the zoning regulations of the City, Will conform to the front -yard and other mothaek and d no Cods saentr.e whether or not a permit is require building of structure shall be moved to a location within t this City unless it conforms to the building, plumbing, heating, electrical and other construction regulations of this City relating to now structures. in addition to conformity with the applicable coda or codes, as minimum .f requirements, all plumbing for such building or structure shall be by a licensed Master plumber, and residential ,.` buildings shall have a 1000 ampere electrical service. If construction, alterations, or repair work on such building or structure will be necessary to sake it conform to such regulations, permits for such work shall be obtained before such building or structure is moved, which pe rmits shall make provision for the doing of such work within 90 days after such building or structure is located in this City. failure to make such bu ".ding or structure conform to such construction .regulatior. within such 90 day period shall constitute a violation of this section 300:2$, and each day that such violation is continued after such 90 day period shall constitute a separate offense. No such permit shall be granted except upon order of the City council after favorable recommendation upon the application by the City Planning Commission. The City Council meTr - - 6t- -fetes 4iseYet #en=-- rsqv4se hold *hail a public has togethor with advertised notice of hearing - Fts- ee�cs.Ioderelk,an reward-the � granting or denial dsnyl si such permit. structure snail be 1Movs4 0 a location within the City unless it will conform to the zoning regulations of the City, Will conform to the front -yard and other mothaek and lot are requirements, and will be a building or structure the same general character and appearance as other buildings or structures in the vicinity. The City Council shall detormined whether or not such building or struet will b e permitted at the oroneaad leu.�►�..� .--- xa or city Cl a r k _ 1 403 Adopt *d by the City Council Decemhnr 17 iaAo t lot are requirements, and will be a building or structure the same general character and appearance as other buildings or structures in the vicinity. The City Council shall detormined whether or not such building or struet will b e permitted at the oroneaad leu.�►�..� .--- xa or city Cl a r k _ 1 403 Adopt *d by the City Council Decemhnr 17 iaAo r f if t I + a�ar��voOD Road / r l �, 1 / 1 MOUND � ` . 1. �. , •N, MINNESOTA CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF AN INFORMAL PUBLIC REARING TO CONSIDER A MOVING BUILDING PERMIT ACCORDING TO CITY CODE SECTION 300:25, AND VARIANCE TO ALLOW A DETACHED GARAGE TO BE MOVED INTO THE CITY OF MOUND AT 5724 LYNWOOD BLVD. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the City of Mound, Minnesota, will meet at City Hall, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota, at 7:30 p.m. on Monday, May 13, 1991 to consider a Conditional Use Permit to allow a detached accessory building to be moved into the City of Mound at 5724 Lynwood Blvd., legally described as follows: The South 220 feet of Lot 21 and the East 1/2 of the South 220 feet of Lot 22, " Lynwold Park," Lake Minnetonka. The structure proposed to be moved is currently located at 13922 91st Street N.E., Elk River, Minnesota. It has been proposed to place the structure 10 feet from the north property line which abuts an improved alley, the required setback from the alley is 30 feet. All persons appearing at said hearing will be given the opportunity to be heard. &A&4Cn1,x C , ( �AAk Francene C. Clark, City Clerk Mailed to the abutting property owners within 350' on April 29, 1991. The City Council Public Hearing will be held on June 11, 1991. • * AR 2 C I TY OF MOUND PART 11. - 1 I �F 4 -A A Date Filed Fee — __. $ 00.00 QtN!IQ 1 T 1 OVAL USE PERM j T Ain i CAT f ON PLANNING i1, ZON ING COMM i SS I Olr (Please type or print the f o l l o w i n g Information.) t Address of Subject Property S - 7 1u L\pa a 2V Lot t H►. r - r � lif 2a- Block Add i t i on — b' as&V I ?_Any, P I D No. S - I I " 00 10 ner' s Name h4s ' 1 , .r - E. Day Phone 44 - 7 )7 _ - I,9 & _ Owner's Address '*`?2 ��___I- )cti.mtxk JzlueG.� Applicant's Name (if other than owner) PtdeL &Z[1 A ova ► Address 0 Z Da K d1 L V- Day�Phone y l '� 7J E x i s t i n g Use of Property: .p,_ = CID O &Amy Zoning District 1` ' z t Has an application !ver been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? es no . If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolut on number(s) (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. (� Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recommendation _ Date Council Action: is Resolution No.__ Date 1405 CCN D I T I (N+IAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Case No. ' Page Two A. All information requested below, a site plan as described in Pert II. and a development schedule providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the construction must be provided before a hearing wil be scheduled a. Type of development for which a Conditional Use Permit is requested: I. Conditional Use (specify): c W " W 2.. Current Zoning and Designation in the future land Use Plan for Mound: C. Development schedule: I.' A development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the pro posed development. 2. Estimated cost of the project: S D. Density (for residential developments only): 1. Number of structures: 2. Dwelling units per structure: rprrP_ a. number per unit type: efficiency 1 bedroom 2 bedroom 3 bedroom 3. Lot area per dwelling unit: 7 4. Total l area: E W -t E. € ffects of the Proposed Use: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke /odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. n� c%tVv,,1dr'4r 14a4 LOW 166 L adw 03ni3338 • t P r P t -AOOP "-(\a x to elf o h b",118 1 ya wo ` 14oq , S1 .tract • S?4 jaws Flat or ';111-V-5- E UST1 14 6 for Men t'. Ulnnt. in lots 21 and ; :. , !�, nwn.ld Perk Hennepin Courity Minnesota 0104m, Mprl� lin: o! t.nm 2t of tof 21 fs VMk Certificate of Survey: I hereby certify timt this is a true and correct repre- sentation of a survey of the w c boundaries of lam <i and mho ip2]F6 + &at Wr of Lot 22, Lyawold Fark, and the location of all existing buildings thereon. It does not purport to show rS _ S+�"�� other improvements or en- s ;[ow,s r croachmentn. l t3kv��C+p 0 A). ~� AM- • M � Y 'a i .. I o Gordon K. Coffin Reg. h 606 � Lund Surveyor and Planner o Lang Luke Minnesota F Sca10 1" 2 40 , Date : 5 -13.76 P o : Iron marker 13. p�nuHe !i /twe14 0 BLVD " �YNvJOao I lk RECEIVED MAY 7199. ��.�.. , Jp l.�e � ,.• ; C' �, � t Plat of ;;urvey for Allen P. Olson in Lots 21 uad 2:: Ivnwold Park How. County Minnesota "8,4k Brie Owl In C A N r* (ins of Let tt ; e Lei 22 . t Certificate of Survey: 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre- - --'- - ',,' sentation of a surv of the boundaries of Lot 21 and tho +i test half of Lot 22 l,yawold wee -ken Park, and the location of a ll ► t`" dos, �sg existing bulUinge thereon. It does not purport to show ether improveatnts or en - ,� t oibachmonta. * ' R • ^4dn. p A � L• I Gordon K. Coffin Beg. l 6064 � ' • . Laud Surveyor and Planner I Long Lake Kimesots. M 8caloa 1" a 40 Date : 5 - 13 - 76 r : o t Iron marker ' X5.0' . • • " e�nuMr til�wistk ' o 004000 eLVd. RECEIVED MAY 7 1991 1 yaq q1 4M ,ay Plat of jurvey for Allen F. Uizjon in Lots 21 wW 2Z, lu*nwold Park (,c Hennepin County, Minnesota„ NorM lone OF leF 22 iJfir #h IfAP Dmgaw d +,j*, %O ja►1 , fe • rwh Certif irate of survey.. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct repre- sentation of a survey of W boundaries of Lot 21 and tho East Wr of Lot 229 4awol.d Perk and the location of all existing buildings thereon. It does not purport to show other improvements or en- croachmentb. • Land Surveyor and planner Loag'Lske Kinaesota 804103 1" = 40' Date 3 5 -1396 o : Iron marker 1410 RECEIVED MAY 7 1991 qtr �Px� s� 1 � '�� w � 1A i 4.'�t" at,is to e�ncrlk ii��«rotk a LYNWObp bwo. ! -D 13 i 3 w F4 i a2 2 ohs =Ja �^'�CaSNttw�t�T t►'�clut�dg S�c9� 1 RECEIVED MAY 7 1991 1 I D 0 a tai La ct� eq 1991 Y �'rnpo6ed �araq� 40 be meved -Fo sr24 Lynwvod 1413 ^i d 1413 CI TY OF MOUND PERMIT NO.: 5341 Maywood Road 472 DATE: Ak FEE: Permit must be posted with moving vehicle. (Mouse $50 / Garage $10) AM I C, AT I ON FOR MOVING A G 1 L D I NG (Please print or type the following information.) Nw* of Apps Icant �.. L�• -'�_�t `P...� Day Phone - 01-19We ... Appli Address « "?..y "xis Name of Mover (' ►vva noklam ... Day Phone of Mover p:"01e0t I-Q uit i o-n 0 bu 1 1 d i na: Owner of Propertys_..1. Day Phone Address --&. r:,- c x i weia c idwy` Block Lot .21 #�ka Additi Plat PID Pr. oposed 1 ocat I on o f • „,21 u l i d l no t Owner of Property: &h. Q &-VV*5 Day Phone q?Z Address 5724 A•4 f7na 653 " Alock Lot Add I t i on �=NJW 9owrk P i at P I D 0l messions of Bultdi _ Width Hei ght To be moved (out: of , into A,, or within ) the City of Mound. Proaosedi Route: on Street: Time of move: Hcw long to be Weight of vehicle: Waht of load: Total Welaht: Type of method to secure load: lA}�N_T: 48 HOUR NOTICE PRiOR TO MOVING STRUCTURE TO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CALL 472 -3711 BETWEEN 8 :00 AM AND 4 :30 PM (AFTER HOURS 544 - 9511). IIJ71LITIES WARNING NOTICE: 454 -0002 DEPOSIT RE ?UiRED OF $ TO INSURE AGAINST DAMAGE TO STREETS (denslt � w 11 be returned If no damage has occured). �NS VR, 6N CER I F AT ,REO IP�D_s M 1 n I mum amount of B. I . $200 9, 000 / i*bU UU 1 P.O. � , , , or —L;h pond $1,000 pp can s 51 NEW APPROVED BYs Official 'i%i7TTT71 Public /` �/ TIT17// Pii � / / /%!%i7. Recelved: State License Insurance "ertificate Distribution: Bldg Official Pol fce Chelf_� Public Works�_ h over,_,,,,, RELEASE OF BOND APPROVED: T', 11, 1 1'. 176rkS Dirictor, 4 Date 0 Sft MAP IA u Ci It OD I Oct.—.' , I ONO IAV HIMMU Oct '00 . UL wo SAN 4013M 1 tP i log 01 I �� ri • . w A '3AW 39V# .600 —.6saft IAN ai 1 � � y ION ` � _` e'Fr^ ^ate 1 rrl0. 0• e. L ♦ •• p � s `s• `V " i � y�. t» •vr� 1- A it* IN IN VI 49 Ano I _� v.r,.r,+ I IT T I Til I I I T T As #4 OOT" Tm 3Av vnmsym ..� +.. ti R.r,r-ii' «SaoP .» . { 'Cr r � r..rrp �rr11� t �, � , NY 4 4 , I•_ M OJ AIII. • AL owe a It ODUZ I In Z) 'I'M IAV xnviovil t f owl I ZONING REQUIREMENTS 12 At SS: APPLICANT: LOT: Z I � ..... ADDN: ZONE: -� REQUIRED LOT AREA.- (19,000 EXISTING LOT AREA: 1t> REQUIRED SETBACKS p<, uprLA 1 FRONT: )o EXISTING & PROPOSED SETBACKS F RONT: I I 5724 Lyn Blvd. Lynwold Pink A t A n M-. B. F-ell Lots 21 Qr ?2 SIDE: SIDE: REAR: # p"asj `t�3'4 "� LAKE SHORE s 1 (11 -1 ©O/4 A m4ry I it SIDE: SIDE: AI cl� cioor:5 -Vck4A-- !sicle 8. V (—) AR: 4 • Fee t7 0, o- -0 LAKESHORE: 50 feet EXISTING & PROPOSED SETBACKS F RONT: I I 5724 Lyn Blvd. Lynwold Pink A t A n M-. B. F-ell Lots 21 Qr ?2 SIDE: SIDE: REAR: # p"asj `t�3'4 "� LAKE SHORE s 1 (11 -1 ©O/4 A m4ry I it Proposed Resolution Case No. 90-011 RESOLUTION #91-_,_ 1� RESOLUTIC)N TO CONCUR WITH THE PL.04NING COMMISSION TO GRANT A SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE TO ALLOW COC"STRUCTION OF A DETACHED GARAGE FOR PART OF LOTS 3, 4, 3 5, BLOCK 7, MOUND TERRACE. PIO #14-117-24 32 0036, 6225 RED OAK ROAD, (P&Z CASE NO. 91-011) WHEREAS, the applicant has applied for a variance to con- struct a 26' x 32' detached garage 5 feet from an unimproved a]- ley right-of-way, the required setback Is 30 feet, for the property located e 522F :led Oak Road, Part of Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 7, Mo-ind Terrace. PID #14-117-24 32 0036, and; WHEREAS, all other structures and uses of the subject property are conforming. and; WHEREAS, the subject property is considered a corner parcel located within the R-1 Single Family Zoning District which ac- cording to the City Code requires, for accessory building . a 30 foot front yard setback, a 4 foot rear yard setback, and 6 foot side yard setback, and; WHEREAS, the 8 foot wide right-of-way is unimproved and Is not used by the public, other than for dumping of refuse, and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and does recommend approval contingent upon certain conditions to afford the owner reasonable use of his land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The City does hereby authorize construction of a nonconform- ing detached garage for the property located at The North 100 feet of Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block 7, Mound Terrace, 6225 Red Oak Road, PId 414-117-24 32 0036, contingent upon the fol- lowing condition: a The City Irit late the street vacation action for the unimproved public right-of-way, and if not possibie, the applicant will file for vacation and the City will waive the fee. In the event the Planning Commission and City Council would not grant the street vacation, the variance will still be in Pffe, /Y17 Proposed Resolutilii Case No. 91 -011 Page 2 2. The City Council authorizes the violations and alterations set forth below, pursuant to Section 23.404, Subdivision (8) with the clear and express understanding that the use remains as a lawful, nonconforming use, subject to all of the provisions and restrictions of Section 23.404. 3. It is determined that the livability of the residential property will be improved by the authorization of the fol- lowing alterations to a nonconforming use of the property to aff�ord the owner reasonable use of his land. a. To construct a 26' x 32' (832 squares feet) detached garage 30 feet from the north front property line and 5- feet from the east front property line. 4. This variance is granted for the following legally described property: The north 100 feet of slots 3, 4, 5 5, Block 7, Mount Ter- race, P1D #14- 117 -24 32 0036. This variance shall be recorded with tl: '"aunty Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to Min - nesota State Statute, Section 462.36, Subdivision (1). This shall be considered a restriction on how thi3 property may be used. 5. The property owner shall have tte responsibility of 'riling this resolution with Hennepin County and paying all costs for such recording. The building permit ?ha II not be issued until proof of recording has been filed with the City Clerk. 1419 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 13, "991 C 0 91 -0 1a halter Neske. 6225 Red OaX Road, cart of Lots 3. 4. i 5. Block 7. H OUpd T er raoe. PID 114- 117 -2 32 0036. YAMN SETBACK FROM ALLEY, Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicants request for a 35 foot variance to the required 30 foot front yard setback requirement from an unimproved 8 foot wide al'ey. The applicant is proposing to construct a 26' x 32' detached garage. Staff recommended granting the variance with the condition the applicant be required to complete the street vacation process. In the event the Planning Commission and City Council would not grant the vacation, the variance would still be in effect. A ouilding permit for the garage would not be issued until the ap- plication for vacation has been received. The applicant, Walter Neske, explained to the Commission that he does not want the street, and neither does his neighbor. He stated it is used for dumping of refuse which he does not want to be responsible for. The Building Official clarified staff's position from the City Planner's perspective, that this property eyis up being a burden on the city, and it is recommended this allay be vacated and a variance not be granted unless the applicant would apply for a vacation. He also clarified that the portion of alley recom- mended to be vacated be that portion between Red Oak and Birch. Mueller commented that he does not agree with staff's recommenda- tion. He does not feel this should be treated as a corner lot since the alley is not improved or used, and maybe the ordinance should be revised to allow a closer setback to unimproved alleys. MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Weiland, to approve the variance with no stipulations. Motion failed. Those in favor were: Mueller, Weiland and 8anus. Those opposed weres Thal, Meyer, Jensen aad Michael. Thal questioned if the City can initiate a street vacation. The Buildir7 Official suggested that the question be referred to the City Attorney. The applicant commented that there are three existing nonconform- ing properties due to the required 30 foot setback from this al- ley. Thal questioned if the City could absor'a the vacation ap- plication fee. MOTION made by Thal, seconded by 8anus, that the Plan- ning Commission recommends granting the variance with the condition that t!+� alley be vacated. The Planning Commission further recommends the City initiate the vacation action, and if not possible, the applicant will file, and the City will waive the foe. In the event the Planning Commission and City Council would not grant the vacation, the variance will still be in effect. Motion :;%rried unanimously. This case will be heard by the City Council on June 11, 1991, at this applicants request. / y/7 C:ITN' cif �i0�..ND ..� S TAFF RL eM DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of May 13, 1991 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official CASE NO.: 91 -011 APPLICANT: Walter Neske LOCATIOPl: 6225 Red Oak Road LEGAL N 100' of Lots 3, 4, 3 5, Block 7, Mound Terrace DESCRIPTION: PID #14- 117 -24 32 0036 SUBJECT: Variance: Setback from Alley ZONING: R -1 Sintie Family Residential BA.WQM The app i i cant seeks to bu i Id a 26' x 32' detached garage with a variance request of 25 feet to the required 30 foot front yard setback. This property is a corner lot due to the 8 foot wide right -of -way Plong the front yard to the east. RLQ QMMEj4j 2AYjfA Staffs recomriendatlon is to grant the variance with the condition the applicant be required to complete the street vacation process. In the event the Planning Commission and City Council would not grant the vacation, the variance would still be in ef- fect. A building permit for the garage would not be issued until the application for vacation has been received. NM This case will be heard by the City Council on May 28, 1991. The abutting neighbors been notified. l4 " 3 I 7� CITY OF h CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road Fee $50.00 Mound, MN 55364 �' 01l___,._� 472 - 1155 Case Na. _VARIANCE #PPL ICATIQN & ANN I NG 9, zON I NC COHM 15S I ON (Please type or pr int the foIIc,wing Information.) Address of Subject Property tOZ 4 5 4:!AV, t2iJ Owner' Name W,6t- a(`Z. R i[ -= S ,-Z _ _,.._ Day Phone, 4 T Z - ZO& �- Owner's Address R ..z OAI� IQi'* App1 I aant's Name (if other than owner) M, AQ4, .S"gST -1, #Qf-)k Address Z1T7 5t+f1 r'WC)r� j gt] _ Day Phone -- , - Lot NcQ OV- H (C.)o -Ca r 3 '�� S r 81 ock 7 0 - ddItIon M `) � r[ PID No. "I `� Z' 3Z 0034� Existing Use of Property:— t ►>E�y'` Zoning District_ I Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other - procedure for this property? yes ( ), no �Xj. if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s) (copies of previous resolutions; must accompany this application). VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR: ( ) Principal Building QV Accessory Building direction setback setback VARIANCE requested required REQUESTED Front Yard: ( N S E W ) Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) Lake Front: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: ( N S D W ) Side Yard: ( N S E W ) 0 of Size: ft. ft. ft. G.� ft. ft. — sq ft ft. ft. ft. 3U- p.. ft. ft. sq ft ft. ft. ft. Z -b" ft. ft. sq ft 199 i VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No. i` Page 2 — 1 Reason for request _'rD 00tL,0 Pa 7 P�H Q A -, 2. Does the present %g of the property conform to 11 reguiatians for the zoning district In which it is located? Yes ), No ( ). If no, specify each non - conforming use: 3. i0 the existing structures comply with all area, height. bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it ►s located? Yes (y), No ( ). if not specify each non - conforming use: 4. Which unique physici1 characteristics of the subject property prevent Its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? t ) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( ? too sma)i ( ) drainage ( 3 sub - surface t ) too shallow ( ) shape (( ) others specify THE Tefc_ UA�) We ASE' c .4IrSLd�� txn _� . � L I.. T 5 ( Zc l S _AU5k- 2 6JtbEYrR_Q _5e (3A K 5. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property Interests In the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ), No (K). If yes, explain 6. Was the hardship created by any other man -made Change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No V), If yes, explain — 7. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a varlance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes r, No (X). If no, list some other properties which are similariy affected? G z,{ e+ &ztfc K_ Acs, ar- . i ,a r(s i certify that aII of the above sta�_ements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises descr.bed in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. /Z V �, 0 Appi icant`s 5f natve Z C � . `' . ��, g Date 9 JU RVEY - OR: JMti'' v CUNSTRUCTiON 11 RECEIVED MAY 1 31991 Rea 0* R 9414 TC I So. 0 .2.== - r _ ' lip, o� 30 t t sr C NOOSE (R.K, :9sZ,o O (> 1 t it " 30 I t 1 J t 1 t — r -- 1 � 1 +ter M 1 P .� '✓ +. OUT H LINE OF 142.4 � c Tht NoRTN ►oe' � ( I s , C f / r B,M, a TOP NUT NYD AT FRONT or \ I House * (,201 REV OAK ROAD ELEV. * 947.4+ , • Deftims FOUND IROA) \ { o DewOrrs 5Er IR0t1 -4 a DRAINAGE 950 a Exisrm(It ELEV. (ISO) a PROPOSED ELEV. DESCRIPTION EXISTING GARA4E FLOOR 958,2 THE NORTH 100 FEET Or LOrs 3,44 S PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR - . !52 .3 BOCK 71 MOUND TERRACE, HEWN. COUNTY MINNESOTA, I herebv certt ►v that this survev, plan or report -as prepared by R.E. Stransky Land Surveyors •e or under av direct supervision and that I as a duty licensed Y Land Surveyor under the bar• of the state or Minnesota. 2701 wsedbndle Street • Su.te 201 t, Rwer.lh,MNS113 staned tn,a2! -�dav oC A.D., 11.9 (612)482,038: Nooart E• stransmv RLs Ml er.. Llcenee No, 11YIS 1 VAA tT' � vr T H I M e . tr+ -� 1 _ I I 1 � r G'oc L--% -V rp r4 eat= T L.fi► -'r Ad ,9 %.ICD RIDGE 2*.A Ti cs 14" o z . Q jxdo CrM FitsctA zxt ►cu�L W��.c. ap ?�i "c�.c, I �. 3 c�a TR.rt+e� 'YP., Pc.YwD - fCFFi7 12" e- $4, • 2�lo TR. Pt_ �ot N ebS( _ pL yWt> tr ' . oc Z�.ta. vv�3 i.� !�" o .0 , tic w 1-4 x 34 .5T. B s a G o►x 3L At� Mom c5'-A L.E 1 d HCSS KC' LS ZONING REOU I ANTS _ ADDRESSt APPLICANTs LOT: BtK t AODN t ZONES REQUIRED LOT AREA EXISTING LOT AREA: ' t �''7s e REM I RED SETBACKS • /-- OK r is FRONT: 3 � i lF , , gal SIDE: To 10 1 (g) (2) �� (A) (7) (6) (5) (4) (3) O s .� SIDE: REAR: 15 feet I � LAKESHOREs Sl) feet � - (39) lots � , F !40 i r I'm .! EXISTING P E TB A � •e1 • _ s, " ( 41 ) r � + -l 1 st * ti. �,,. �. (7;) ) '�' s � • .�� FRONT: ��iL. Ly._ iV I j46) � s ��i •� Q 35 .! ('I) �►�. �/ tom. 4� it = SIDE: _ too 1, - a. ,� ( SIDE: REAR: • 11(49) (SD) t67) •, t s)iso (53) et i as q w LAKESHf?REt t � _ +r _ .... �� m•. . _ y DATE By �.r T +r+ . rw�r R yy STAFF RECOMME DATE: Planning Commission Agenda of June 10, 1991 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official CASE NO.: 91 -016 ~ APPLICANT: Tom Reese LOCATION: 5641 Bartlett Blvd. LEGAL Part of Government Lot 1, Section 23 DESCRIPTION: PID #23- 117 -24 14 0003 SUBJECT: Existing Nonconforming Setback ZONING: R -1 Single Family Residential _gal! U The applicant's proposed accessory building meets all required setbacks for the R -1 zoning district. A variance of 3.2' to the required 4' side yard setback is requested to recognize the ex- isting nonconformity in the existing detached garage. COMMENTS The applicant has noted the utilities are mounted on the sideof the nonconforming structure. The structure Is well maintained and in good condition. It appears a practical difficulty exists in that the addition of a new fully complying detached building does not warrant the relocation of these utilities and removal of the nonconforming structure. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends recognition of the existing nonconforming struc- ture and approval of the variance request. NOTE This case will be heard by the City Council on June 11, 1991. HASA8 The abutting neighbors have been notified. Ew re ne * CITY OF MOUND CITY O 5341 Maywood Road Fee $50.00 Mound, MN 55364 472-1155 Case No. -9 -01 VARIANCE APPLICATION PLANNIMQ &-- ZONiNG COMMi551ON (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subje Property 5(ql M tl-o Owner's Name S F Day Phone "W - Z r8.3 Owner's Address 3.4ME- Applicant's Name (If other than owner) Address Day Phone Lot Addition PID No.;2 • •1 Existing Use of Property: Zoning District �-- Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use Permit. or other zoning procedure for this property? yes ( ), no (4). if yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide re 0lution number(s) (copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application).. VARIANCE REQUESTED FORS ( ) Principal Building (' Accessory Building direction setback setback VARIANCE requested required REQUESTED Front Yards ( N S E W ) Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) Lake Front: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: ( N SOE W ) Side Yards ( N 5 E W ) D ot S i z e : ft. f(. ft. 8 ft. ft. sq ft /* 5 r'eucrzv zr- 2- /Ne. ft. ft. ,/ ft. ` - ft. ft. sq ft I-s 11- - 7v V)W ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft 1421 Case No . _ q —0 ,► I Reason for request .,V S. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone havIno roperty Interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted T Yes ( ). NO t ). If yes, explain UST 6. Was the hardship created b any other man -made change, such as th relocation of - road? Yes ry), No ( ). If yes, explain_S?`V 7. Are the conditions of hardship for which y request a variance 9: cullar only tO the property described in this petition? Yes ) !f no, list some other properties which are simi rly affected? I Certify that alt of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I Consent tO the entry In or upon the premises described in this appII Cat ion by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, intainin d removing such notices as may be required by law. Appl icant's Signature - Date • • 1430 2 tk5►es th p tt Of the property conform to a I 1 regu 1 at i ons for the Ing Oiltric n rich it is located? Yes spec I fY 1 nvn -formi ng use: W , No ( ). If no. 3. Do the exist) ltru1tures comply with all setbiCk raga Ions hOr the area, heigh t. bulk, and zoning district to which 1t is located? Yee! ), ND If no. specify each non - conforming use: w °.. MhiCh; unique i� cha of the sub prop It reasonab a use for any of the iontng ,. uses permitted d stri In- that p ( ) too narrow ( ) topography too ,il ; drainage soil sub - surface t )) ! shape other: specify S. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone havIno roperty Interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted T Yes ( ). NO t ). If yes, explain UST 6. Was the hardship created b any other man -made change, such as th relocation of - road? Yes ry), No ( ). If yes, explain_S?`V 7. Are the conditions of hardship for which y request a variance 9: cullar only tO the property described in this petition? Yes ) !f no, list some other properties which are simi rly affected? I Certify that alt of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. I Consent tO the entry In or upon the premises described in this appII Cat ion by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, intainin d removing such notices as may be required by law. Appl icant's Signature - Date • • 1430 RECEIVED JUN HA I Bartlett Blvd Mound, MN 55354 June 3, 1991 Mound Planning Commission Unfortunately I must be out of town the evening of June 10. I have asked my contractor, Gary Danielson to rill in for me on the constructir.n details. So far as the other facts in this request are concerned that perhaps do not show on the application, I will address them here. I am seeking to build a garage that will allow me the remaining space that I need to house on my property a lifetime collection of historically significant automobiles. This request parallels a similar request in 1985 wherein I was grimed a permit to build a smaller garage primarily to store my evaryday use vehicles so that the older structure could be devoted to the storage and maintenance of the collection. At that time, the rule was that the new structure had to be conforming. No tyX of variance was necessary. I had at the time several stalls in adjacent property where I stored the extra vehicles. With changes in ownership I have lost these sp&es. With theft and vandalism in mind, I have to store them on my property or sell them. My insurance company does not want me to store all the vehicles in a single structure, particularly one where maintenance work may go on. The requested structure which is totally conforming will properly accommodate my needs. The old garage, a portion of which is presently non - conforming as to sideyard setback was built in 1946 prior to the installation of the existing code. While I cannot prove it, I am sure that it was conforming then, as the house and garage would have been the premium new structure in Mound, with lots of visibility to any zoning persons who may have been around at the time. This portion of the old structure houses my shop, and also provides the meter socket locations to the property for power and gas. My neighbor, Ray Peters, has no objection to the continuance of the reduced sideyard setback as evidenced by the letter enclosed with the application. I am asking that we treat the new permit application as we did the 1985 one, granting for the record, if you deem necessary, a recognition of the pre - existing sideyard non- conformanc- )ccasioned by the change in the zoning code. Y rs t: ul Iq3 BY GATE CHKO. BY DATE ILI 442! Gl 3 i2oo /OS' --- SHEET N0. OF c JOB NO. � N C tv %A A , -� jv ssI DAWC P ATZ 0 a SO x 3z- 4 6 Sc►ALF �r -k'�5 41 rC SURVEY FOR: , 4i 0AQD • • Prepared By: SLNOELL & MADSON. INC. Engineers • 3wv »yon • Planners • $oils Testing BAR;%E'T 80'Jl.£VAR 10560 Wayzata eonleverd tl,ed a 36 advrrlinou kllnnstonka, kin. $6616 (Formerly O oPufl cn Aw) 9 *el. see -root 904 5 oo, Of w ~'i i `af�tel f Blvd (10►rnerly C1wW^a� AV)I F t � I r1sr. g oo i � w �• r ij' A' 11 ,wee • ` lj t f ... 9 0.4 s� p h ' surY�y Lint ' J� 1 --Cr we is fellows: �� Ba9t1u11n0 It the intersection of the South i Avenue) wltnthe wst of the r east t1 12 2 O 00 feet of Seto 66vorneont let 1; thence On an e35u0iea bearing of South S4 Oegreee 90 Inu eco te$ 00 snds rest, $1020 the South tine Of said Bartlett Bouteverd, S distance Of U �.1KE 6P'r 12 .110 /Nt; hence South 6 de grees to einutee 00 second. r 7/ ( CO O K SRI re 11 M Or late ilinneto�t tnentaot to the easterly. elon9 lei, shoreline, to tM intersection with a line drawl SovS90rly fr ool the point of be inning and para1101 with the J Mreby Certi that th}S Su►vf; Wf prepare4 under my listhe of 1014 Government Lot 1; thence su"rvisi0n and that 1 a■ 0 licensed land Surveyor under the feet, rl t M1009 Sol% pareliel 1140 about 347 laws of the State of Ninneso s, pd o killnning, he Ore W. k9 1r.6 tote: 18 August 1986 license No. 17006 -J y 33 f "• 40 ' K ` lj i � � f Q Q o C C .0 OP X X K KKAAJ NQT�Sc _( i i) e • 9enetet iron mmumat set. _) kerin /f AR are based M th ., S South 1101 Of Bartlett Boulevard having a0 /SSUmad bearing of South ..... � N N degrees 30 etnuteo 00 S0coms Volt. t Area • 39,800 sa.ft.: or 0.91 /c. + . SCR pT i that � ►rlhtipS1 lbri41a0 a 1 --Cr we is fellows: �� Ba9t1u11n0 It the intersection of the South i Avenue) wltnthe wst of the r east t1 12 2 O 00 feet of Seto 66vorneont let 1; thence On an e35u0iea bearing of South S4 Oegreee 90 Inu eco te$ 00 snds rest, $1020 the South tine Of said Bartlett Bouteverd, S distance Of U �.1KE 6P'r 12 .110 /Nt; hence South 6 de grees to einutee 00 second. r 7/ ( CO O K SRI re 11 M Or late ilinneto�t tnentaot to the easterly. elon9 lei, shoreline, to tM intersection with a line drawl SovS90rly fr ool the point of be inning and para1101 with the J Mreby Certi that th}S Su►vf; Wf prepare4 under my listhe of 1014 Government Lot 1; thence su"rvisi0n and that 1 a■ 0 licensed land Surveyor under the feet, rl t M1009 Sol% pareliel 1140 about 347 laws of the State of Ninneso s, pd o killnning, he Ore W. k9 1r.6 tote: 18 August 1986 license No. 17006 -J y 33 • SF Bartlett Blvd Mound, MIN 55364 May 16, 1991 To: Around City Council Subject: Sideyard Setback I owr. the next parcel east of the residence of Tom and Amy Reese, at 5641 Bartlett. I have no problem with the existing location of their old garage. It does not interfere with the use of my property. Yours truly, a A y • • 1434 ZONING REQUIREMENTS ADDRESS s 5�!p ` APPLICANT: �� LOT: ZONE: REQUIRED LOT AREAS n EXISTING LOT AREA: •'ex� S REQUIRED SETBACKS FRONT: SIDE: L# 6y- // , f SIDE: ; REAR: -+51- Fee e 1 , LAKESHORE: 50 feet F X I S T I N G a PROPOSED SETBACKS NRTIZ� 1D cowPic rn �-; nt tic. f1CCc°55 Or' FRONT: 1 SIDE: SIDE: REAR: t •. -HORE DATES BY: • C 1 I+7t't"t""'t7C'Y V; J Thomas Y. Ftsase �QM dT A POINT IN S LINE OF CMAPHAN PLACE DtS `ns FT FI Y A ON sAto S t LINE = FRt_]M THE L: liN nF LAK av� TN taLY1Q5 FT A nwr SAtO ST LENE ^ TW c 9 DFC. 42 MIN F TO LAKP IN Et Y A1 1114C SAID IAKE o DE 10 MIN w T© BEr B1dg.Permit 61367(4- 12 -85) Garage Permit G -1159 3 -19 -33 - A/C ff wn"k G-0143(4-5 -,(S / p` � Ilk 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1991 Case No. 91 -018: Mayne A Lin Terwilliger, 2945 Cambridge Lane, Lots 9 8 l0, Block 34, Mvchwood, PID *24-117-24 42 OOOQ. VARIANCE - fence helaht. Building Official, Jon Sutherland, reviewed the applicant's request for a 2 foot variance in fence height. The applicant's property abuts a 15 foot wide public right -of -way on the south side of the lot, therefore, making this a corner lot with the abutting right -of -way a front yard. City Code allows a maximum fence height of 48 Inches In the front yard. The City right -of -way is used mainly for pedestrian access to the commons area, it Is wooded and resembles a nature trail. Staff recommended approval of the fence height variance to afford the applicants reasonable use and allow greater privacy of the property. MOTION made by Voss, seconded by Mueller, to recommend approval of the 2' fence height variance as requested. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be heard by the City Council on June 11, 1991. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 4 pD -o#- 'j /f}N/✓I11I6 T7e M DATE: P1.. ding Commission Agenda of June 10, 1991 TO: Planning Commission, Applicant and Staff FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building Official CASE NO.: 91 -018 APPLICANT: Wayne & Lin Terwilliger LOCATION: 2945 Cambridge Lane LEGAL Lots 9 8 10, Block 34, Wychwood, DESCRIPTION: PID #24- 117 -24 42 0008 SUBJECT: Variance Request ZONING: R -2 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant's request is for a 2 foot variance in fence height. The Applicant's property abuts a 15 foot wide public right -of -way on the south side of the lot, therefore, making this a corner lot with the abutting right -of -way a front yard. City Code Section 23.415(4)a allows a maximum fence height of 48 inches in the front yard. COMMENTS The City right -of -way is used mainly for pedestrian access to the commons area, it is wooded and resembles a nature trail. The ap- plicants request appears reasonable to keep foot traffic on the right -of -way and maintain their privacy. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the fence height variance to afford the applicants reasonable use and allow greater privacy of the property. NOTE This case w i l l be heard by the City Council on June 25, 1991. The abuttina neighbors have been notified. 3V��\ Zr � CITY OF MOUND 5]4} Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 472-}\55 Fee____ _ Case VARIANCE APPLICATION PLANNING a ZONI G---COMMISSION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subject Propert Owner' s Name W - rz , l J4 - rGkW ILW.C Day Phone 4 . Owner's Addreym s ftKfl Applicant's Name (if other than owner) Address Lot 1 i ~�- to Add ftf Day Phone Bloc PID Existing Use of Property:_ Zoning Has an application ewer been made For zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure For this property? yes ( ), no ( K). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, and provide resolution number(s)°(copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application). VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR: < ) Principal Building ( ) Accessory Building direction setback setback VARIANCE requested required REQUESTED Front Yard: ( N 5 E W ) ft. ft, ft' Rear Yard: ( N G E W ) Ft' ft. ft. Lake Front: ( N 6 E W } Ft, ft. ft. Side Yard: ( N���� E W } ft, Ft, r o Ft. Side Yard: ( N S E W ) ft. ft. ft' Lot Size: sq ft ___________sq ft sq ft VARIANCE APPLICATION Case No._ Page 2 1. reason for request r SF1'tB,I__ r3� Bhcrt it @oM r 1�'�' SAC � �►]Ei� pf �AC6 ALM "6A.0 ZAt 2. doe "`��i � es T rjt' u' se' o"f i 'grope y - cbhk V r k fk a�r %r fo the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (vJ, No ( ). if n0 *; specify each non - conforming use: 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it Is located Yes ( ), No ( ). if no, specify each non - conforming use: 4. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent Its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning` district? ( V) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( V) too small N/) drainage ( ) sub- surface ( V) too shallow f V) shape ( ) other: specify 5. Was the hardship described above created by the action of anyone having property Interests in the sand after the zoning ordinance was adopted? Yes ( ), No (V). If yes, explain 6. Was the hardship created b y any oth r man -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (Vg. If yes, explain 7. Are the conditions of hardship for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (vim, No (V), If no, list some other properties which are simil1ri affected? .1,7' 7 � - ..?,Q� kl E G "3S 14iJD TrtE I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. i consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be requ ired by law. Applicant's Signature _ W,- "AL Otlk, Date W .2;X it �r ow\ tIt.t v� el t�.i J74� L ©n �ti 4 U , v,3►� �� , Y 9 t 4 ` y� loo b.�Ci,�„ t M 1na s ti %A � 4 v 1ti� o wl' t- � Cy wr � oc� a.g5u, �Q,r- W ' �4C .; tom- ct y 1a °z\ v`s VQ :v �lev yy c�se. Acl(C�L'r • �Z c e S �:rr¢: {11��y v.jvy '��� pr��l �c y also . �Nc v�}tlL 1JL'T �n - BRIGHTON I 1, ,� I wood strwy. 0 0 o Wood o H e Rock strwy. `mss' Conc. ret. rvo// ret wall Conc. Cont. 3 "steel post Rock ref wn /! patio wo /k walk Conc. '(8i7.03eeder) 3981 - - /f 95.35 _ � ) 85.1 -- -- 801.05 - ret � r (47 (40) (40) (40) ; ;; (4 ( 40 ) (40) (40) (/5 (52) p O '� O a o 12 0o II o 10 0 9 0 10 0 9 8 0 7 g000 10 33 -, z.. �. } f 34 ~t t I (47) JL (40) 1 (40) 1 (40) (/5�� '4� (45) (40) (40) (401. '(/5) ( 52) -46.75 W..0/ - 4QG10 - u _ /65.00 ui LLJ Z s a a, a 41 'pa -t,�c. r �ss it I an :Sr Rf lr J' 2l • fi w • +-a^i6s} tP1 - 0' :l. • _ Y• - I 24K sulv 2 . • f' _,�,. S _ 3 •` 1 ) � y���t p .. 1 js1 i •� � �� t •r��, 1b ' Q` fs)�'��� c: � � +: T � a: ice` : � • � ny a _ _ a •s;tw� so !�!«� • S s VIP -t ~ In1 )..7 d e r 3+• r a 1Si •..f•,�I )' go N O_T_y.T v mar .9, �y : ' .' ._2St' ai. • •: aRi r {p a Y • r x � ti . ry � ? �� G .l .. • t AL '• e v . a: a rk s my •� 4 T At IL r- y 10 ' .•i as O ` �' • Sin x s • r • e •a i +e , as .e wr ZONING REQUIREMENTS ADDRESS: Z +4 APPLICANT LOT: LK: ADDN: L G�iW `•-C/� ZONE: REQUIRED LOT AREA : - w EXISTING LOT AREA: REQUIRED SETBACKS FRONT: Zb r , SIDE: SIDE: REAR: 15 feet LAKESHORE: 50 feet f , f , EXISTING 3 PROPOSED S TBACKS FRONT: SIDE: , f ; SIDE: REAR: • f f LAKESHORE: DATE s _ /f By s <f l• . l:'1 MINUTES - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - MAY 16, 1991 0 Members present: Heise', Smith, Brewer, Marks, Pietrowski, Longpre. Absent: Guttormson, ...:Menemy -Cook. Also present: Judy Marshik, Chairperson Business Development Team; Bruce Chamberlain of VanDoren Hazard and Stallings; John Norman, Finance Director and Ed Shukle, City Manager. Upon motion by Brewer, seconded by Smith, and carried unanimously, the minutes of the April 18, 1991 regular meeting were approved. Bruce Chamberlain gave an update on the Downtown Mound Improvement Project. He indicated that several businesses and the Chamber of Commerce will he contributing towards the purchase of planters in the downtown area. He also reviewed the activities of the D,1-sign Committee and Promotions Committee. He then introduced Judy Marshik, Chairperson of the Business Development Team. Marshik reviewed the activities of the Business Development Team. Sne indicated that they are .recommending -that- -the City "of Mound position itself as a recreational /cultural /scenic destination. This recommendation would trade on: 1) Trends which indicate a gradual urbanization of Mound which will lead to a change in its demographics; 2) The absence of a strong cultural/ recreational destination west of the core cities; 3) The rural beauty of Mound and its lakes. Further actions that they are looking at is structur =ng the Business Development Team into four work groups: 1) The Lost Lake Development Task Force; 2) Business cooperation task force; 3) Comprehensive business strategy task force; 4) Inter - community development cooperation task force. It W83 moved by Brewer, seconded by Marks, and carried unanimously to adopt the recommendation of the Business Development Team and to present this recommendation to the City Council at its regular meeting on June 11, 1991. Paul Meisel, Chairman of the EDC and Judy Marshik will be present at the council meeting to present this recommendation. City Manager Ed Shukle provided a brief update of the Public Works materials storage issue. He indicated the City was undergoing an environmental assessment on the Anthony's Floral property and in the proct..s of conducting soil boring testing at the site. It was then noted that the next meeting of the EDC will be Thursday, June 20, 1991 at 7 AM, in conference room 301. Upon motion by Brewer, seconded by Smith, and carried unanimously, the meeting was adjourned at 8 :30 AM. ReAmctfully submitted, City Pukle Ma City Manager 1431 • The City of Mound rescarchQuik �linncaE���li.. �Gnnr.��ra Business Developm Team Meeting of the Economic Development Comml"lon May 16, 1 "1 May 16, 1991 Report to the Economic Development Council of the City of Mound From: Business Development Team, Chair, Judy Marshik Activities: One-on -one meetings with each team member and some members of other teams and representatives from Chamber and Bus/Prof. Council Three team meetings Findings: 1) Mound, a city in transition a) Loss of industrial employer base (local convenience shoppers) b) Encroaching urbanization and development (markets in transition/mix of blue and white collar) c) Lack of a retail or destination identity (confusion in the marketplace about reason to shop in or come to Mound) d) Competition from other developing cities (Wayzata, Long Lake, Waconia, Delano) e) Diversion of traffic from Mound (Highways to north and south) (Shopping centers west of Mound turnoffs) 2) Results in: a) Empty shops and buildings due to lack of customer base to support businesses, in general b) Reduced earnings of selected businesses which causes deterioration of commercial space and reluctance to reinvest in community c) Lack of civic pride and further erosion of appearance 3) Suggests that: L� a) Need to identify the Mound identity for the year 2000 Ogt b) Need to bring the lake back into Mound 1. Industrial /employer community 3. Historic community • fill the Tonka building Preserve and upgrade • Create tourist draw 2. Recreational community 4. Retail community (needs niche) • Country inn Discount (Walmart, CUB) • Theater on the lake Theme boutiques • Cottage industry 1437 K : 1ir'l rik �titlllC � �t1� -Attj ng RECOMMENDATION: The City of Mound Business Development Team the Economic Development Commission May 16, 1991 The Business 011W*pnent Team recommends that the City of Mound position itself as a reaeatieonaUculbxaVscenic destination. This would trade on: trends which indi a gradual urbanization of Mound, which will lead to a change in its demographics. the absence of a strong cultural/recreatioml destination west c the Twin Cities the nsal bear of Mound and its lakes. FURTHER ACTIONS: The Business Development Team is structuring itself into four work groups. When appropriate►, other Individuals from the community will be sought to PWddPW in these groups. The groups are: The lost take Development Task Force - Chair, Shale Nyberg Objectives: 1, Crew a target list of businesses for placement at the lost Lake development. 2) Recruit and recommend developers to sponsor the various businesses. 3) Work with regulatory agencies to comply with lake usage requirements but advocate Mound's needs. 4) Work with the City and other state and local sources to suggest a funding initiative package to spark development in light of some of the site's problems. The Business Cooperation Task Force - Chair, Scott Tinklenberg Objectives: 1) Wild trust with the vocal businesses by working them to develop cross - business promotional ideas. 2) Explore the concept of an area -wide frequent buyer \ program, and recommend whether the concept would be appropriate for Mound and should be market tested. 3) Support the workshop being planned with Mainstreet, USA faculty. Encourage the involvement of the Westonka Chamber and the Business and Professional Council members. 4) Establish liaison reporting with the Chamber and the Council so that periodic reports of Team progress are made to their members, • • • 1439 ® . The City of Mound rcwar:hQuik Nlinnrapolis, Miniicsota Business Development Team Meeting of the Economic Development Commission 0 May 16. 1991 • The Comprehensive Business Strategy Task Force - Chair, Michelle Edwards Objectives: 1) Develop a vision of downtown Mound including but not limited to: • A duster plan for preferred locations for business types. • Road layouts which return the lake drive and scenic lake roads to Mound. • Interim and long term parking strategies which must accommodate changing and growing business usage. 2) Make recommendations for best use guidelines of various parcels of land downtown. Review the recommendations for key redevelopment sites and suggest usage for these sites and a possible time- table for change in usage. 3) Suggest a way to identify local businesses which are interested in growing into Mound's market . position and identify specific needs they have that are current barriers to growth and change. 4) Prioritize businesses which will need to be recruited to Mound to complement existing businesses. Create a recruitment strategy. The Inter - Community Development Cooperation Task Force, Chair, Glen Norton 1) Identify issues pertinent to business development which are long range and would benefit from collaboration with other communities. This includes but is not limited to: • New highways being built in the area • Current road and highway traffic patterns • Creation of a regional identity and business strategy to recruit businesses to the 2) area. Meet with representatives of area cities to determine their economic development goals, their structure and resources to meet their goals, their interest in our goals and assess the potential for collaboration. 3) Research local, county, state and federal road changes which are anticipated in ti ie next 20 years . and assess the impact on Mound's consumer base. 4) Recommend a plan for long term action. 1437 • TO: MATOR AND CITT COUNCIL FROM: ED 3HU[LE CITY WAGER RE: LOCAL OPTION SALES TAI DATE: JUNE 6, 1991 As you know, the 1991 - Minne3ota State Legislature and Governor Arne Carlson compromised in an omnibus tax bill which incorporates a 6.5% sales tax rather than the existing 6 %. A portion of this sales tax will be allocated to a local government trust fund. This fund will receive the revenues from one and one half cents of the existing state sales tax plus a new 112 cent local option sales tax making the total sales tax rate 6.5 cents. The legislature included within the tax bill, a provision for each county in the state of Minnesota to decide whether or not to impose a local option sales tax for 1992. Each county board has to decide this by July 1, 1991. Under the law, the increase in the state sales tax rate of 112% automatically goes into effect July 1, 1991 and automatically expires on December 31, 1991. For the period after December 31, 1991, the law gives each county board the option of imposing a 112% local . 3ales tax in the county. Thus, for the local option sales tax to take effect after December 31, 1991, each county board must act to impose the tax in the county. The county board must make its decision to impose this tax by July 1st of this year. If the county decides to impose a tax, it will go into effect on January 1 , 1992. If it decides not to impose the tax by July 1st of this year, it will be automatically removed effective January 1, 1992. Once the county board has decided to impose the tax, it remains in effect until it acts to rescind the tax - unless cities and towns or voters take action to rescind the tax. If the county board decides to rescind the tax prior to August 1st of any year, the tax is removed on July 1st of the next year. If Hennepin County decides not to impose the local option sales tax for any year, the city, town, county and special taxing district governments within Hennepin County would not receive payment of state aids in the following year for: - Homestead and Nq Agricultural g wral Credit Aid (RAGA) - Disparity Reduction Aid and Attached Machinery Aid - Homestead and Agricultural Credit Guarantee - Supplemental Homestead Credit - Disparity Reduction Credit - 25% of the base aid for county human service programs - Local Government Aid and Equalization Aid. If local government aid to a city, town or county, or the aid for human service programs and the attached machinery aid to a county is reduced or eliminated because the county board decides not to impose the local option sales tax, counties, cities and towns are authorized to increase their levy limits to make up for the loss of these aids. The loss of the other aids and credits listed above, is automatically made up through higher property taxes. Revenue from the local option sales tax will be deposited in the local government trust fund. In addition, the law provides for the depositing of 25% of the revenue raised from the 6% sales tax rate into the fund. To reverse the decision of the Hennepin County Board, to impose or rescind the tax, the city councils and town boards of cities and towns whose populations make up a majority of Hennepin County's population, must adopt resolutions to impose a tax rescinded by the county, or rescind a tax imposed by the county. Also, in cases where Heneepin County never takes action to impose a tax, the city councils and town boards can vote to impose it. The decision of cities and towns affects the entire county. Cities and towns must enact resolutions no later than August 1st. In addition, beginning in 1993, voters can elect to rescind the tax imposed by their county. To rescind the tax, voters must begin by filing a petition with the county, signed by at least 10% of the voters in each city and town in the county. This requires the county to put the issue on the ballot at the next general election. To rescind the tax, the majority of the voters voting on the issue, must vote to rescind. What this all means is that the legislature and the governor have compromised the tax bill to the point where the half percent sales tax and a portion of the existing sales tax will relieve increases in property taxes. In other words, the local option sales tax will pay for local government aid and other aids mentioned above so that aids will not be eliminated and cities will not be forced to raise property taxes in gigantic proportions. Although none of us really agree with a local option sales tax, there really is no other choice than for us to support it and to convince our Hennepin County Board to pass the local option sales tax. I have attached information from a variety of sources with regard to the local option saes tax issue. First, I have received a letter dated May 28, 19Q1 from .Jot — E. Derus, Chairman of the 14 Y/ Hennepin Board of Commissioners, who is requesting that by June 11, 1991, we inform the county board as to our preference on the local option sales tax issue. As stated above, the county board must decide by July 13t whether to approve or reject the 112 cent sales tax in order for it to take effect January 1, 1992. Second, a two page memo from Commissioner Dorothy A. McClung, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Revenue, explaining the local option sales tax. Third, information from the League of Minnesota Cities Cities Bulletin dated May 31, 1991, discussing the local option sales tax and its impact on cities should it not be passed by each county board. Fourth, information from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) indicating that Mound would lose $705,408 if the local option sales tax is not approved and further, a total tax rate increase at 16.137. Finally, a chart prepared by the city of Minneapolis for communities in Hennepin County, and specifically for the City of Mound, dealing with the estimated impact of not approving the local option sales tax on an average valued home of $91,300, in Mound, if the locate option sales tax is trot approved, the tax increases would have to jump to approximately $180 per year for that value of a property. It is imperative that the City Council indicate to the county board that it desires the board to approve the local option sales . tax. I don't believe the City of Mound would be in a very good position of having to increase taxes of nearly 17% from what it currently taxes. In addition, the tax bill that was signed by Governor Carlson cuts $34 million in aids for December 1991 aid payments and 1992 aid payments. In other words, $17 million will be cut from the December 1991 payment and another $17 million from the 1992 aid payment. For Mound, this amounts to somewhere around $25,000 in local government aid cuts. Please remember that we were cut $40,000 in local government aid in the July 1991 aid payment. Ncne of these cuts will be restored undee this new tax bill. Although, this is another significant cut, it represents 1/10 of what Governor Carlson had proposed at the beginning of the 1991 session. Therefore, I do not believe that the City of Mound has really any choice other than to recommend to the county board that they do approve the local option sales tax. I have attached a resolution to that effect. Although, Mr. Derus has asked for approval by June 11th, and since our council meeting falls on June 11th, I have taken the liberty of sending a copy of this resolution anticipating its approval to Commissioner Tad Jude and the rest of the Hennepin County Board indicating your willingness to have them pass this tax. I should also point out that the City of Mound was asked to appear at a press conference held Wednesday, June 5, 1991, held at the Hennepin County Government Center. A number of cities from Hennepin County were present and each one of us was given a 144:L 3 few minutes to address the news reporters on the effects of not imposing the local option sales tax. Perhaps you saw something on channel 9 Prime Time News, Wednesday, June 5th. There is also an article in the Star Tribune of June 6th, a copy of which is attached for your review. I just received a memo dated June 6, 1991, from Don Slater, Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities, in which he outlines a recent line item veto of Governor Carlson on two of the tax bill provisions. The memo explains that the distribution formula for 1993 and 1994 aid payments from the local government trust fund was vetoed. Also vetoed was the payment from the trust fund in 1993 and 1994 for local government aid, * Homestead and Agricultural Aid, (HACA) Disparity Reduction Aid, 3 minor aids and part of income maintenance payments to the counties. The third provision that was vetoed was the distribution of growth in the trust fund for fiscal years 1994 and 1995 compared to 1992 and 1993, estimated as follows: 24% Income Maintenance Aid, 42% Growth in HACA as payment for class rate reductions and 33% available for growth and aid formulas. The memo also states what the veto did and what the veto does not do. It illustrates the complex nature of the tax bill and the relationship that local governments have with the State of Minnesota in the area of M local government aid. If you have any questions with regard to the information in this memo or the material, please contact me. We will discuss it thoroughly Tuesday evening. ES:ls • 1 YY3 JOHN E. DERUS !HONE ` �tw c cwu,uu+N w+ a a+a aoae s .e ♦,� BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS May 28, 1991 Edward J. Shukle, Jr. City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Shukle: 4'D MAY 31 1991 Governor Carlson is expected to approve an "optional" one -half cent sales tax to be implemented at the county level to partially offset reductions in state aids to local governments. This optional sales tax is to be implemented on a county - -wide basis, depending on the wishes of cities whose residents constitute a majority of the county's population. No city will be eligible to receive local government aids (LGA) if the county or the majority of the cities within the county fail to implement the local option sales tax. Within Hennepin County, cities are the primary beneficiaries of the local government and property tax relief aids. Of the local government aid originally scheduled to be paid during 1991, cities were to receive $84.2 million, and the County was to receive $33,500. Of the original Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aids (HACA) sheduled to be paid in 1991, cities within Heru;epin County would have received $46 million and the County $29.2 million. Approximately 80 percent of the LGA and HACA distributed to non - school local governments in Hennepin County goes to its cities. Should Hennepin County and /or a majority of its cities fail to enact the local option sales tax, these aids would have to be replaced with an increased property tax levy. Enclosed is Resolution 91 -5 -501, which was adopted by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners on flay 21, 1991. In this resolution, we request that city councils express their preCeren , 7e on the local option sales tax and forward a resolution to the County Board by June 11, 1991. The County must approve or reject the one -half cent sales tax by July 1, 1991, in order for it to take effect on January 1, 1992. If the city councils of cities in Hennepin County representing a majority of the population of the County disagree with the County's position, they may, by August 1, 1991, overturn that decision. In order for the County's initial decision to reflect the wishes of the majority of its cities, please inform us by resolution as to the wishes of your city by June 1.1. We look forward to working with you as efficiently as possible to resolve this issue in the best interests of the majority of our residents. cerely, 4 , hn E. Derus, Chair ennepin County Board of Commissioners Enclosure 2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 • • • 1444 "l' 21 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -5 -501 The following resolution was offered by Commissioner Derus, seconded by Commissioner Andrew: WHEREAS, Governor Carlson is expected to sign a tax bill providing that county boards may vote to enact a 112 cent sales tax; and that counties not levying such a tax will lose a significant amount of state funding that helps pay for state mandated programs; and WHEREAS, Cities within Hennepin County and cities and counties outside Of Hennepin County will be recipients of funding as a result of the 1/2 .cent sales tax levied within Hennepin County. BE IT RESOLVED, That the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners requests that the city councils vote by resolution by June 11, 1991 requesting that the County Board enact or reject this 1/2 cent sales tax. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the city councils also be requested to express whether it would be their intent to ask for the local option if the County decided not to. Commissioner Andrew moved a substitute motion that the County Board vote to reject implementation of the 1/2 cent sales tax. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Keefe. Chairman Derus called for a vote on the motion to substitute and there being a voice vote, ruled the motion failed. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were Seven YEAS and No NAYS as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY OTHER Peter McLaughlin X Randy Johnson X John Keefe X Tad Jude X Judy Makowske X Mark Andrew X John E. Derus, Chairman X RESOLUTION ADOPTED. ATTEST: er 06 the County Boar NY 21 1991 1 y y,5' � A1Lt• .' }12 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OR REVENUE Local Government Services Division Mail Station 3340 St. Paul, MN. '5146 -3340 May 30,1991 RECD JUN 31991 To: Mayors of Cities and Chairs of Town Boards Your county board will be deciding by July 1, 1991 whether or not to impose a local option sales tax for 1992. This requirement results from a law passed by the 1991 state legislature. This letter: explains the provisions of the law authorizing the county board to impose a local option sales tax; explains the consequences of the board's decision not to impose the tax; and describes the procedures city councils and town boards can follow to reverse the decision of the county board. Local Option Sales Tax Under the law, an increase in the state sales tax rate of one -half percent automatically goes into effect July 1, 1991 and automatically expires on December 31, 1991. For the period after December 31, 1991, the law gives each county board the option of imposing a one -half percent local sales tax in the county. Thus, for the lo-al option sale tax to take effect after December 31, 1991 each county board must act to impose the tax in the county. The county board must make its decision to impose the tax by July 1 of the year. The board must notify the Commissioner of Revenue of its decision by July 15. If the county decides to impose the tax, it will go into effect on January 1 of the next year. if it decides not to impose the tax by July 1 of this year, it will be automatically removed effective January 1, 1992. Once a board has decided to impose the tax, it remains in effect until it acts to rescind the tax -- unless cities and towns or voters take action to rescind the tax as described below. If the county board decides to rescind the tax prior to August 1 of any year the tax is removed on July 1 of the next year. If imposed, the local option sales tax will be collected by the Department of Revenue -- along with the state sales tax. All the administrative require- ments of imposing and collecting the tax -- including notification of retailers -- will be handled by the Department of Revenue. continued... Is 144 L AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Consequences of not imposing the local option sales tax If your county decides not to impose the local option sales tax for any year, the city, town, county and special taxing district g overnments within your county will not receive payment of state aids in the following year for: • homestead and agricultural credit aid (HACA) • disparity reduction aid and attached machinery aid • homestead and agricultural credit guarantee • supplemental homestead credit • disparity reduction credit • 25 percent of the base aid for county human service programs • local government aid and equalization aid If the local government aid to a city, town or county, or the aid for human service programs and the attached machinery aid to a county is reduced or eliminated because a county board decides not to impose the local option sales tax, counties, cities and towns are authorized to increase their levy limits to make up for the loss of these aids. The loss of the other aids and credits listed above is automatically made up through higher property taxes. Revenue from the local option sales tax will be deposited in a new trust account dedicated to the payment of state aid -- the local government trust fund. In addition, the law provides for the depositing of 25 percent of the revenue raised from the six percent state sales tax rate into the fund. Reversing the decision of the county board To reverse the decision of a county board to impose or rescind the tax, the S city councils and town boards of cities and towns whose populations make up a majority of the county's population must adopt resolutions to impose a tax rescinded by the county, or rescind a tax imposed by the county. Also, in cases where your county board never takes action to impose the tax, city councils and town boards can vote to impose it. The decision of the cities and towns affects the entire county. Cities and towns must enact their resolutions no later than August 1. The county auditor must notify the Commissioner of Revenue of the decision of the cities and towns. In addition, beginning in 1993, voters can elect to rescind the tax imposed by their county. To rescind the tax, voters must begin by filing a petition with the county signed by at least ten percent of the voters in each city and town in the county. This requires the county to put the issue on the ballot at the next general election. To rescind the tax, a majority of the voters voting on the issue must vote to rescind. If you have questions, please call Rich Gardner of the Department's Local Government Services Division at (612) 296 -3155. Si cerely, Dor ihy�1' �McClung Commi�sioAer lyy? � N �' Zl May 31,1"1 Every county would gain by adopting local option sales tax an JUN 31991 League of Minnesota Cities Cities Bull etin Alen► dab show that every one of We Sale's 17 counties wft" pW nbftW by adopdag the 112 cent tocd opdor sift tax, rands Wu s the tax ad kft am heal aids. K a Ccwety Kjrxa the Iasi optics tats, We COO y sad ib dries ad townships win lose an of Weir ettWieg aidtr -LA, NACA. disparity SK and several smaller aids. The table oa pope 3 $bow: the e9ldtated Per C*a an OOM at stake for each COOKY. 7be &W Cdu= shows the loal per c qm county. cit and towtt>: WP aid mcelved whin the COOK. The second column !bows the Pa Capita dollars rained by the 112 cent local Option sales tax wiWiO the County. For example, for the ram entry. Aidtlo County. total per capita aids in 1991 are $106.01. while We 112 Cent sales tax would yield $20.22 per capita. 7 bus, by rejecdog the local sales $106.01 or aid per capita, and property taxes would have to be inavased by approxhutely this amount. Anuming that the sales tax is all paid by AIM County residents. these Addeals.wodd save M22 p cap on Weir sales tax payments. 7btu, Aitkio County residents would be worse off by $106.01 mimrr $20.22 equals $33.79 per apim. 7be sales tax rate would rernain at 6 percent in Aitkin County, and the difference between 6 percent and the Kate general fund sales tax rate of 4112 percent would go into the local government trust fund and would Provide a windfall for the other Counties which adopt the ktcai option tax. The third Column shows the ratio O( the total aid within the county divided by the I/2 cent sales ax. For Aiddo County. the ratio is $106.01 divided by $20.22. or 3.2. Tb s means Mat Aitkio County, by rejecdog tie local a x. WOWS lone 5.2 dunes as much aid as it would save in sales ax Summary of new laws This issue of the Bulletin includes summaries of laws the Legislature passed during the 1991 legislative session. The session ended on May 20, 1991. • Bills by topic, page S • Omnibus tax bill, page 27. I ft? payments.. Generally. if this ratio is more than 1.0. the couWy rraideots would gain by adopting the local option tax. The lowest ratio of the 97 counties is 2.4 for Hennepin County. Tbus, even Hennepin would be better off overall by adopting the local option tax, by a ratio of 2.4 to' 1. If Hennepin rejected the tax, it would allow about 5190 million of sales tax revenue collected in Hennepin (the difference between 6 percent and 41/2 percent) to be divided anwng the other 86 counties as a windfall above Ioresent aid amounts. The data are for 1991 and do not include the December 1991 aid cuts. the income maintenance base portion Of the local government trust fund allocation, or changes in future years. However, the figures give a good approxhwtioo of the situation for each County. The reason adoption of the local ax appears so favorable and rejection appears so unfavorable for every county is that the new law provides for each county adopting the tax to gain its share of a 2-cent sales tax, while rejection only saves county taxpayers 1/2 -cent of sales tax. Thus, the statewide average benefit ratio of adopting the tax is 2 to 112, or 4 to 1. Cities should use this information to clarify the issues involved and to urge citizens and their county boards to support county approval of the local option sales tax before the July I deadline See samp;e resolution page 5. JT • • • • Comparison of aids lost if 1/2 percent sales tax not adopted versus sales tax savings Aitkin lAl $ 20.22 per cap. 1991 city, horn Ratio of county, In% aw to town dd s.ln tax 1/2% County same per cap. in county Balm tax Aitkin 106.01 20.22 5.2 Anoka 117.16 23.36 5.0 Becker 93.00 20.97 4.4 BelbwW 81.14 25.60 3.2 Benton 89.86 18.63 4.8 Big Stone 326.68 18.01 18.1 Blue Earth 192.92 36.06 5.3 Brown 234.80 26.59 8.8 Carlton 209.60 18.16 11.5 Carver 114.49 19.79 5.8 Cass 58.43 18.61 3.1 Chippewa 237.03 23.13 10.2 Chisago 13339 14.19 9.4 Clay 165.44 18.08 9.2 Clearwater 100.72 15.33 6.6 Cock 145.69 49.01 3.0 Cottonwood 247.96 17.63 14.1 Crow Wing 108.72 39.50 2.8 Dakota 101.05 28.36 3.6 Dodge 234.85 16.84 13.9 Douglas 135.76 28.73 4.7 Faribault 2.38.50 20.05 11.9 Fillmorc 240.18 17.93 13.4 Freeborn 220.99 28.00 7.9 Goodhue 117.47 21.58 5.4 Grant 214.48 15.89 13.5 Hennepin 146.39 61.22 2.4 Houston 206.17 10.03 20.6 Hubbard 6937 21.% 3.2 Isanti 126.38 18.42 6.9 Itasca 162.88 29.20 5.6 Jackson 233.89 15.85 16.0 Kanabec 13832 17.14 8.1 Kandiyohi 151.18 29.97 5.0 Kittson 201.95 15.05 13.4 Koochiching 205.28 31.93 6.4 Lac Qui Parle 239.44 24.15 9.9 Lake 266.82 26.74 10.0 Lake of the Woods 149.52 20.60 7.3 Le S ue ur 183.91 16.64 11.1 Lincoln 246.30 13.36 18.4 Lyor. 192.52 28.95 6.6 Mahauinen 186.25 18.71 10.0 Marshall 170.24 10.90 15.6 May 31, 1991 Martin 19918 21.44 Pa eap. 1991 city, h om Rado of qty, In% aid M town am idea tax in% County name Per cap in county raw tax Martin 213.22 21.44 9.9 Mdeod 201.89 26.56 7.6 Meeker 158.08 17.03 9.3 Mille Lace 110.60 22.25 SA Morrison 146.08 15.08 9.7 Mower 249.62 2028 12.3 Murray 225.91 13.89 16.3 Nicollet 197.91 13.62 14.5 Nobles 230.18 33.40 6.9 I4oraa 235.72 16.60 142 Olmsted 152.70 39.38 3.9 Ottertail 146.65 27.15 5.4 Pennington 217.47 29.92 7.3 Pine 95.45 13.71 6.1 Pipestone 223.99 19.53 113 Polk 218.57 18.86 11.6 Pope 168.27 14.27 11.8 Ramsey 201.42 42.81 4.7 Red [Ake 270.19 13.87 17A Redwood 233.66 20.40 11.5 Renville 209.70 13.86 15.1 Rice 169.84 1939 8.7 Rock 211.44 15.40 13.7 Roseau 109.33 20.43 $A Scan 123.72 28.14 4.4 Sherburne 62.52 13.62 4.6 Sibley 224.76 1 9.32. 24.1 Stearns 168.36 33.41 5.0 Stock 1 %.62 27.90 7.0 Stevens 239.96 23.41 10.3 St. Louis 301.57 28.68 103 Swift 253.62 16.79 13.1 Todd 172.41 10.32 16.7 Traverse 2 %.14 14.66 20.2 Wabasha 176.33 13.68 11.2 Wadena 135.10 26.03 5.2 Waseca 206.41 19.30 10.7 Washington %.45 20.40 4.7 Watonwan 212.48 18.59 11.4 Wilkin 279.55 13.19 21.2 Winona 202.43 20.91 9.7 Wright 97.60 17.41 5.6 Yellow Medicine 245.58 13.81 17.8 PrWed on recycled paper Page 3 1 Ny ? Summary of omnibus tax bill City aid cuts Ytie lied tax bill, whitb d1e L401 tan paned ne May 20 not! GoMe M cNiew is expected to si=n. eonlninA new city aid cwt of $34 11111110 – =17 million tlrom the Decent. bar 1991 Old pnyrneab and $17 million boon So 1992 aid Payments. 1%e $34 million of new city aid CO I S 0094=11i orate $340 union tit; govet= proposed is bb aWM budS& Back $17 million cut will be about 1.6 pasrsat of am= base (k" pin a. While the League "COMM in really sang back the 9 Va>tor's original proposal. the eombbsdoi at new aid cob with cub case Wady enacted is pill Apificiuc 1Ue entice p xbage of sirs lasts it an ham • art in?dy 199t aids, passed in J40ntttY-2.01 t -1 111 of ateverne base (don not rVew in 1942). M Cut in December 1991 "in new tats 11111 - poem of revenue base (don not repeat in 1992). • art in 1942 aids passed 11990 session -14 paoeoi of revenue base. • art in 1942 aids passed in new tax b4i1 -1.6 percent of tevane: base. Fwtha complicating this rktum are the few dot LGA mud HP.CA (homestead and agriculture liedit aid) hAd some Watua huilt in before the aid orb started, and flat HACA will iomw due to state payment for class ease seductions contained in the new tax bill. Ove ll. city. county. and kwnship property tax muer payments Are estimated to irumw ftm $723 million in 1991 to $763 million in 1991 n Local government trw t Anti A major new feature of the tax bi!1 which the Lague has promoted is the local government trust fund. INS fund will receive the revenues from 1 1/2 cents of the existing state sales tax, Plus a new 1/2 cent local option son tax. msklng the total mks tax rate 61/ 2 cuts. The 2-cest soul for sloe that fund Is estimated to yield $699 million in rural year 1992 and $786 million in fiscal year 1993. providing total funding for awscbool local aids. including LGA. HACA. disparity reduuctioo Aid, part of the $139 million base of the mew incase maintenance Wueover. And several smaller aid Program. Cities are bopdW that the deli. cased revenue sauce and reraoval of All city Aids ftm the state general fund will provide grease Mobility and powtb for City OWL Estimate$ show that VW fund growth ftm the 1992.93 biennium to the 1994.95 bienoium will be 5259 million, allocated as follows: • Aid growth provided by existing law -539 million • New HACA resulting Fran class rate rrductioos--S71 million • Reductioo of lute cop: for income maintenance —S63 rdliioa • Available for aid growhb or new aid p(ov=ur – S86 million • TOTAL --W9 million While the iw1usion of the iocante Maiateruou t ' -, 4 in the trust fund is unweka ippears justified by the fad 0.at the fiscal 1992 base year only includes about 11.112 mwnibs of sales tax receipts; thus, abnormal growth in 1993 provides adequate bust food growth to awn all of the categories listed above. The $84 miilioo available for aid growth is favorabit, compared to no gmwtb Provided in previous law. The extra 1/2 amt Males tax will be mandatory statewide from July 1 December 31,1991. County boards guy vote to adopt the 1/2 cent tax by July 1. 1991. for sakes starting Jan y 1. 1992. In a provision deveoped the League, whatever the county decides can be reversed by resolutions of the governing bodies of cities and tovros within the county ha ving a majority of the county - s population. Thus, if A county fails to adopt the tax, the cities and towns within the county could adopt it. Each county. as well as the cities and towns within each county, have this option for Adoption or rescission each year. if A county rails to adop the tax, the sales tax rate in the county does not bop to 41/2 parade. it stays rt 6 Percent. Yet all aids within the county are dirrmiruted. and the difference between a 6 percent and 4112 percent sales tax goes into the local govan. ment that fund as a windfall for all loca: govemmeots in the other counties. For an xvernge county. &ibne to adopt she tax would mran aid losses equal to a 2 percent sales tax. wbile saving only 1/2 percent on the sales tax. In every county, the aid loss would be much Vasa than the saki tax gain. (For further information we the article VA county data table on pages 1 and 3.) For 1991 and 1492. distribrdions Fran the trust trend will equal present Aid aenounb for each city, allay the aid culL IUe bill =W for a ocw commit. .tee. the Advisory Commission as latagovanrttaatal Relations (ACUt) which may recoinmteod to the 1992 Legislature new formulas for distribrd- 11 trot fund money. Levy limits for 19912 The levy limit bias- for 1992 for each city will be identical to the original 1991 levy limit base. with no three percent increase or population g;nwth factor. (Levy limits continue to apply only to cities over 2,.500 Population). Cities will be allowed to nuke up for the 1992 aid cuts. The combined impacts of the levy limits and aid cuts arc illustrated in this example for a hypothetical city starting 1991 with $50 or uet levy and $50 of aid. M ay 31,1991 PrWed on recycled paper P a ge 27 14.50 • r� LJ • U" AM Told Original payable 1991 $50 S30 $loo 1991 cut of 1 ly 1991 aid 2 Ncw cut in Dec. 1991 aid -1 Final totals for payabk 1991 30 46.40 96.40 Swing base for 1992 30 loo 1990 cut for payable 1992 -2.40 New cut in payable 1992 aid -1.60 Final totals for Payable 1992 34 46 loo Thus. the original 1991 levy limit base of $100 also becomies the 1992 levy limit base. meaning oo growth is allowed compared to the oriliaW $100. However. compared to the rtml 0 9l total of 596.40.5100 represents wth of 3.7 peneot. the 1942 Levy to replace the 1992 aid cuts requires an eight percent levy iocrrxse. from S50 to S54. This pem otage will be lower for low -aid cities and higher for high -aid cities. While these levy limits arc severe, the League succeeded in improving the limits from those in the original House bill and the veined coofermom committee bin. They mnen the Legislature's intent to bold down Property taxes in the face of aid cuts. 7be ley issue is achitving the repeal of at1 levy WAS for taxes payable in 1993. as still specified in Law. IT Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations The tax bill creates an Advisory Commission on. intergovernmental Relations (ACi1R). The comtnission t1islAture make mcoaunendations to the regarding the distribution Page 28 Of money in the kcal jovermnem trust fund (LGTF), beginning with ae estimated $840 million in fiscal year 1994. A three -founts majority vote of the commission must approve recom. mendations. The recommendations could also cover related areas such as mandates and cooperation and COMM. uation of local government units. The ACiR is to submit reco mueo. dations by February I of each year. starting with Feb. 1,1992 for aids applicable to taxes payable in 1993. The commission's recommendations art only advisory. so the distribution of trust fund revenues will depend on legislative action. Commission membership For the period July 1.1991 to June . 30. 1992, the commission will consist Of 20 members, as follows: *Five state representatives appointed by the speaker. •Five state senators appointed by the subcommittee on Committees of the Rules Comrnidee. At least two representatives and two senators must be from Greater Minnesota. *Four city ofrlcws selected by the governor from a slate of eight submit- ted by the League of Minnesota Cities. At least two of the ofrfciah must reside outside the mevo area. (City officials can be either elected or awlected offikials, such as dry managers, budget directors, etc.). * bree COnoty officials and an township official selected by the governor is a manner "In to that described for city oti3cialL '7bo representatives of she executive braub of stale govaomeot„ Appointed by the gomoor Beginning July 1. 1992. the number of House sod Seam mm - , will be reduced ltom five each to two each. leaving the commisigioa wi& 14 members. Mo- legislative mga& n will naive S53 per day when engaged in commisska busioess, plat es. peasas. The COMmissios's budlu is $13.OG0 per year for expenses, with •o budget for stag The commission may request sid0s a ftom the Depart. mein of Revenue sod char state agencies, It scents certain dirt a major topic for the commission will be the possible adoptidm of s sew formula or formulas for diddWoo of city aW At least regarding LGA. and possibly HACA as wen. Possible adopdos or modification of the Ladd study recommendations or a diffavat approach for so LGA fornsub wm be on the agenda. Thus. the wort of the commission will be crucial to Cities. JT Class rate changes Article eraf rates f den property and cabins. The new elks League seeks nominations for ACIR The league is seeking names of Persons interested in serving on the Advisory Commission on Intergov. emmental Relations (AM) created by the new tax sill. Tie ACiR will have a crucial role in recorruneadigg formulas for the distria Uoo of over $800 million per year from the new local goverwrmeot trust fund. The League is to recommend eight city oriicals, and from this list. the Governor will appoint four members. At least four of the tight Dominations from the League must reside outside the metro arcs; and at least two of the four appoints; by the governor. The city officials can be eitha elected or appointed officals. such as City managers, budget directors, etc. Further information on the duties sod operation of the commission is provided on page of this bulletin. City officials interested in being appointer) to the C0mmissioo should apply by calling or writing to Lynda Woulfc, 612 - 227. 5600,183 East University Ave., St. Paul 35101. JT Pr(nttd on rrcycltd paper IM", Cities Bulletin / YS/ aft tfiesa t r bomes for taxes pyable its 1!!2 at 11►7UN arrW vale i A PNOW M113„iti00 arts vial" 2A Pauat Mirearwr S11S aalutt valw 23 P«'oW Plrr ante payable io 1993. all VdW ornr S?2M wW have a class ale of 2A pertxat rate» theta win be no ttihd tier. (t' MUM residential homestead aft 30 - 68.000 at ace percent; 568 000.110,000 at two perrearg am asarhet valve over 5113;000 at theft penal.) 71t dw we for not- ic a at - =h =W MWedW popaty will de- teast Imm die current 3.0 percent to 22 111 10- floc Pay 1992.2.6 peaoeet for Pay 1993. Sad 231- rest floc Pay 1"'L )buns for spa ow* (hwor mom afti) wW detar+et se km the 1 w PS 3.6 peroest to 3.3 peso w floc Pay 1992. Std 3.4 for Pay 1493. Besiodng wild taxes payable is 1993. tbess will be a dend class Sysum forcabios (ono- oommcncW papesties). Those with a mukd VAN of less than $72,000 will be taxed at two parent. value over $72 000 wW be taxed at 23 perreot- Por antes payable in 1992. all cabins wW hove a class rate of 2.2 percent. (The current rate is 23 percent for abim retaMiess of value.) Pfopertles oow taxers at 3.06 Paccar, including hither - valued eoctrme�ciaViodrrsbial property (mmtd value over $100A00) will also rfoeive a phased -io class rate rreduc- tioa For taxes payable in 1992. these properties will have a class rate of 4.75 pare a 0 will decrease to 4.7 percent W 1993. and 4.6 percent for 1994. SH Referendum levies apply to market value Article 1 —In an effort to help demonstrate the full impact of referen- dum levies, for schools and other governmental units (including cities), the brill requires that all such levies be Applied to the estimated market value Of SH affected properties. Under COMM law. these levies. like general property tax levies. are spread on the to capacity of a propin Y. Ana class rates have been applied. Thb WOVISioo Will be effective for nelenod►rm taxes payable in 1993. (An exception Is the SL Paul wiml district wbere market value must be rased begiaoiot for taxes payable in 1994.) to addition an Levy referenda ballots mast imelnde the following wteffwW "By count yes on this ballot q. You are voting for a property lax increase." SH Service sharing / cooperation and consolidation incentivies Article 14 creates two new Programs to eacourage and provide some fioaociot for local governments to jointly provide services or to merge. The concept to encourage service Charing and local govetmnent eoosoli• datiom. h voluntary, available for cities. townships, and counties, and will be funded with $1.3 million for the next bkDnium. Legislator: strongly supported the concept because they have been impressed with the success of similar incentives for school consolidation, And are urging cities, counties. and townships to participate. Ooe of the program would provde service sharint g3 to local governments which propose to jointly Provide a service that would reduce costs and inerrase effreieocy. if the local units can prove the need for financial assistance to meet the start- up costs of the service blending. At least 40 percent of the $1.3 million are initially dedicated to a cooperation and consolidation pro- gram. This is a .our -year program of phasea -in merging of two or more local governments into one unit. During the first or second yen of consolidation, a referendum would be required on the question of combining. If such a referendum fails, the aid which had been received for the undertaking would have to be repaid to the granting fund. A maximum of $100.00 per year could be provided to any combined unit. with limitations oil the aid per capita. The department of trade and economic development will approve and adrrunister the grants. SH Advertising changes for truth in taxation Amick 3 orates a three -tined advertising requirement for truth in taxation. Beginning with calendar year 1991. the requirements are; • Cities over 2.300 population must publish a ooe- quarto page newspaper advertisement of their public truth in taxation bearing. • Cities between 1.000 and 2.5$10 Population must publish a one- eighth Page newspaper advertisement: and 0 Cities wader 1,000 population do Dot have to publish an advertisement W a newspaper. but must post notice of the bearing in the conmr unity. ID addition, the mailed notice will no longer include the time and location of a possible second, contiou. ation bearing. Instead, information on a continuatios bearing must be announced at the first meeting. A continuation bearing must be held at least five business days. but no more than 14 business days after the original bearing. In order to address the property tax burden concerns of renters, the owners of rental residential property with four or more units will be required to either mail or deliver a copy of the truth in taxation notice for that property to each tenant or post a copy of the notice in a conspicuous place on the rental premises. For properties where tax incre- meat or fiscal disparities tax rates apply, the proposed tax information will be listed as a separate liic on the notice, and oo longer included in the aggregate listing of special taxing districts. Despite substantial oppisition to parcel - specific tntth iu Wcatiou notices, they will be requircd in • r� L May 31 1"1 Pr ncjc ei� paper ______ _ Pave 2 9 1 4S.'., Haoeph4 Ramsey. aid St. Louis Cooties beglonioS this yurar. calendar year 1991 for taus payable im 1992. with the remainias 84 counties • scbeduled to begin using 1atcel specific ootices in 1991 SH LGA deductions for state agency costs Article 1 afro deals with the local govermssent aid (LGA) fimdioS pot wbkb has long been tapped to pay various now related to services provided by state aseacks for local govetumew at related p *SramL Previously. these dedu Clow were made through the appropriations caw for state agency budgets. The League has always opposed this process because it is bad pocky and phitosopby. this sidmmistS does not happen many other slate aid progrun• and LGA could becom a "black bole" for future state agency cOS4. This yem the deductions were included in the tax bill. rather than the appropriations bills. Deductions have been capped a 1991 distributions for the future. Ova the oca biennia n. the biA allocates: t1Y Ins utter fwd after opine of dhe Stater Auditor $217AM :217.0011 fadormation ai.isioo) Department of Employee aelatione f 55.000 s 36.000 (ants of administering Iced goveremaot pay equity) Dcpwtmeaht of Administration $201.100 $205,800 MAC end loaf government records) . SH Utility franchise fees on cooperatives, no cap Article 9 clarifies that fwaochise fee payments may be required (tam cooperative electric: associations that furnish utility services within the city. in addition, the bill don not include a cap of the fee. SH Levy for schools. reimbursement for cities and counties Ankle 4-16 1991. for taxes payable in 1992, school districts any levy up to $1 per student b reimburse cities and counties within the district for crane - related oats. This levy will reimburse for police and sheriff Hasson services to schools; DARE programs: and salaries and beoeflts of Poll= Sad sherif[s.wbose.p busty responsibility is investigating drug - related cranes. SH Fire aid distribution Article 13 changes the state rue aid distribution fmwb so that one. half of the calculation will be based on the market value of the fire service area. rather than oo the net in capacity. The other ooe -half dWnbu- tion continues to be based no popula- tion. This change will correct a previous error wbeo assessed values were recalculated to tax capacity. Until 1989. ooe -half of the distribution had been made on the basis of assessed values. Wbeo the change was made to tax capacity, fire depaArnents with relatively more homestead property is their to base received less state aid and those with relatively more eommerciallindustrial property in then tax base received m. >re aid. The bill would adjust this situation and distribute state run aid in proportions simile to those in 1988. before the change. The bill also eliminates the initial county -level distribwioa of state tiro aid that has been made before distribu- does to the loaf fire departments. This win result in a more uniform. complete distrihi ion to participating fire departments. TB Regional library levies Article 4 caps regional library operating levies at three perccoL Cite current limit allows up to sin percent wood increase.) SH Special levy authority for redistricting Article 4 includes and o ft for a a U&M $1 per capita spew" for counties only to pay the cow of redistriellog --the establishment of election precincts. required notion . W r ssigoaren of vow b the statewide voter r+egistradoe system. Of each t1 per capita the comay kvin. 23 cents murk be shared with the cities in the county with populations over 30.000. Earlier. a Scutt proposal had allowed a levy of up to $2 per capita. while early estimate projected the 0014 up to $4 pet capita. Jug for clarification. here is a 59 of what WASNT bduded in the final tax bill • I:aniUU= on debt levies • A change to tun properth► tax PsYmelft • 7be oon- bomestead credit relief aid • A discount for prepayment of Property tioxes a Delay of December 15 aid payments until December 30 NOW Special taxing authority for individual dties is in the Law Sunnaa- ries 1991 under special legislation. SH Page 30 Pr/nled on recycled poper LMC Cities Bulletin /453 Estimated revenues and expenditures of local government trust fund The new tax bill specifics the ttwemei which will go into the local government trust fund (LGTF) and the expenditures to be made from the fiend. The table sbows the estimated remipta and expeeWhm for the find. "Phew points should be note* 1. The aid cuts in the new tax bill we WAlt into the numbers. I The FM LGTF revenues are low because only about 11 -1/2 mooths Of ales tax receipts are included. (July 1991 Sales tax b not received wW Aug W 2t}, May 1992 Saks and balf Of June 1992 gala are received in Jane). Thb explains the high 12.8 Percent growth in LGTF revenues from FY92 to FY93. 3. Contrary to some reports, two. thirds of the growth does NOT 8o to state aid for county bur ao services. 7be new bill provides that 67 percent of the increase in L *W revenues will SO to several Specified purposes. The distribution of the total estimated growth of 5239 million is shown in the table, with the portion of growth going to human Services being 62.809.2 - 24 perceat. Moil of the rest of the 67 percent goes to HACA growth. The other 33 percent amounts to 583.3 million and is available for growth in existing aid formulas or new formula. 4. Actual numbers may vary considerably, especially since HACA growth due to payment for property class rate reductions is currently being recalculated by the Department of Revenue. These estimates indicate that trust fund revenues will grow in proportion to mks tax growth, perhaps about six Of seven percent per year in oomal economic years. The League is hopeful that the new tout fund approach will provide greater stability and growth for city aids than has been the r..rSe in recent years. JT Estimated revenues and expenditures of local government trust fund ($ million) FY92 rY93 IrTU & 43 A. Payments f"M local 8overameat toast find I. IAA It RQ aid 2 Disparity aid, non- school 3. HACA. rwa -shoot 4. New HACA for pay '93 and pay '94 class nsi redoetiotti s• Attached machinery aid. non - school 6. Border city disparity credit 7. SuppkmenW homestead wDdit I- Deparmaaatt of revenue and !inane administration 9. Available to reduce aid cuts 10. booms Maintenance W:eover base 11. Touts FY94 FY9S FY94 & " $288.3 5282.2 5570.5 5282.2 $282.2 5364.4 30.2 30.2 60.4 30.2 30.2 60.4 362.8 409.4 772.2 409.4 409.4 818.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.1 443 71.4 2.4 2.4 4.8 2A 2.4 4.8 2.6 2.6 5.2 2.6 2.6 51 0.9 0.9 1.8 0.9 0.9 1.8 03 O 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 1.9 0.0 1.9 1.9 34.9 34.9 69.8 66.3 663 132.6 722.6 763.1 1487.6 821.1 840.2 1661.3 $. Reveatrea b local 801ernmeat trust fund (2 ants of asks tut and mvE1) OrKludes base - broadening in new to bill) 698.9 788.7 1487.6 (About ( +12.80 111/2 months) C. Differewx - available from trust for old Increases or new aid programs 844.9 901.9 ( +7.196) (6.796) 1746.8 1746.8- 1661.3 •85.3 • s etua8e, 19lf?A3 to 1994195 -36.1. 0.0 46.4 71.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.0 0.0 62.8 173.7 (67%1 259.2) 259.2 ( +17.496) 259.2- 173.7 •85.3 ' 5 y 31 1991 PrWed on recyckd paper Pdbe 3 I Estimated Estimated increase in tax I rates that Would state aid ( to city that ( local option occur if sales tax i is lost if i is not ( approved local option - --- --- ( Cit - - - - -- A.M.M. Cities i sales tax is ( Tax Rat Tax Rat s: ssssssss• ssssssssss sl sss isssI ncrease DAYTON s I $186,257 ssssrssssssss sssss DEEPHAVEN ( ( $123,397 ( 9.811 9.196 12.956 EDEN PRAIRIE ( 51,205,080 ( 2.313 7.387 EDINA I $51,992 ( I $242,548 0.091 4.373 FALCON HEIGHTS FRIDLEY ( I $319,615 ( 0.318 12.675 4.741 15.404 GOLDEN VALLEY I $2,404,543 ( I $1,508,449 ( 12.214 21.917 HASTINGS HOPKINS ( $2,003,713 ( 6.466 27.258 10.723 31.399 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS ( $1,577,262 ( I $1, 11.022 15.228 MAHTOMEDI ( I $335050,988 999 7.595 12.156 MAPLE GROVE MAPLEWOOD ( ( $1,859,890 ( 9.973 7.462 15.860 11.386 MENDOTA HEIGHTS I $2,012,537 ( 7.437 11.660 MINNEAPOLIS MINNETONKA $85$514648 ( , I 2.368 32.484 7.412 36.663 MOUND I $1,377,371 ( I $705,408 2.330 6.703 MOUNDS VIEW ( I $886,822 11.996 16.137 NEW BRIGHTON NEW HOPE i I $1,378,912 ( 18.863 10.058 23,222 14.200 NEWPORT I $1,771,394 ( ( $389,241 ( 12.612 16.671 NORTH ST PAUL OAKDALE ( $888,795 ( 16.239 16.796 21.965 21.016 ORONO I $1,328,679 ( I $91,460 ( 14.840 20.995 OSSEO PLYMOUTH 0.708 5.465 13.370 KE ( $15389,526 ( ( $735,926 2.816 RAMSEY� RICHFIELD ( I $734,957 ( 11.989 16.605 24.466 25.133 ROBBINSDALE I $4,768,701 ( ( $2,282,382 25.969 30.268 ROSEMOUNT ( ( $797,771 37.918 41.893 ROSEVILLE ( ( $1,568,696 11.165 16.141 SAINT ANTHONY I ( $425,405 4.922 9.177 SAINT FRANCIS ( I $99,971 7.683 11.778 SAINT LC pARK ( ( $4,419,256 10.920 19.441 SAINT PAL ( ( $56,585,103 ( 11.624 15.822 SAINT PAL per{ I $600,773 ( 39.659 43.288 SAVACE SHAKOpEE 33.978 39.595 21.250 SHOREVIEW i $521,894 ( ( $826,374 6.263 18.175 SHOREWOOD ( I $253,77 5.065 9.362 SOUTH ST PAUL SPRING LAKE PARK ( I $3,345, ( 133 3.358 38.007 7.874 43.042 SPRING PARK I $369, ( I $83,877 I 11.468 20.995 STILLWATER $1 $138 5.114 9.281 WAYZATA WEST ST PAUL I 078 I 19 . 3 82 25.128 6.170 WOODBURY I $1,932,789 ( I $1,010,669 14.955 20.048 WOODLAND ( I $ 12,413 5.584 11.371 I 0.637 5.583 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, 5/24/91 U 0- 70 0 • RESOLUTION 91- RESOLUTION URGING HENNEPIN COUNTY TO ADOPT LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX WHEREAS, the adoption of the 1/2 percent local option sales tax by Hennepin County would maintain aids to the county and the cities and townships within the county; and WHEREAS, failure of Hennepin County to adopt the local option tax :could result in the loss of all county, city and township aids within the county, amounting to an aid loss of about 2.4 times as much as the county revenues from the 112 percent sales tax; and WHEREAS, the failure of Hennepin-County to adopt the tax would result in aids currently being received by the local governments in the County instead being re- distributed as a windfall to the counties which adopt the tax; and WHEREAS, failure to adopt the tax would greatly increase property taxes in Hennepin County, THERE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mound City Council urges the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to adopt the 112 percent local option sales tax prior to the July 1 deadline for such adoption. The following councilmembers voted in the affirmative; The following councilmembers voted in the negative: Mayor Skip Johnson Attest: City Clerk • 1157 " F_ -Fi I League o, .Minnesota Cities June 6, 1991 H'D JUN 61991 183 University Ave. East SL Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAL 221-0986) TO: Mayors, Managers, and C1erkL FROM: Donald A. Slater, Executive Director SUBJECT: GOVERNOR'S LINE -ITEM VETO OF TWO TAX BILL PROVISIONS On May 31, Governor Carlson line -item vetoed two sections of the omnibus tax bill. By far the more important of these provisions is Article 2, section 4, which is described below. What the Bill Contained Before the Veto *Distribution formula for 1993 and 1994 aid payments from the Local Government Trust Fund, containing the revenues from the 1/2 cent local option sales tax plus 1 -1/2 cents of the state sales tax. *Payment from the trust fund in 1993 and 1994 for LGA, HACA, disparity reduction aid, three minor aids, and part of income maintenance payments to counties. *Distribution of growth in the trust fund for fiscal years 1994 -95 compared to 1992 -93 estimated as follows: 20 for income maintenance aid, 42% for growth in HACA as payment for class rate reductions, and 33% available for growth in aid formulas. What The Veto Did *The Governor's veto eliminated the provisions listed in the previous section. Therefore, the law will not contain any provisions for distribution of trust fund money in fiscal years 1994 -95 (aids and taxes payable in 1993 and 1994) for either base -level funds or growth. *The Legislature must adopt a new distribution formula for trust fund money in tree 1992 session. Since a new law must be passed and signed, the Governor will have considerable leverage to obtain the type of distribution he wants. 0 *In his veto message, the Governor said that he wanted .7% of the fiscal year 1994 -95 growth to go to income maintenance, rather than the 24% in the original bill. This high level of income maintenance aid would leave no trust fund money for growth in aid formulas such as LGA. I yS$ Mayor, Mangers, and Clerks Page 2 June 6, 1991 *The League objects to the Governors desire to have 67% of trust fund growth go to income maintenance aid, which is currently a state General Fund obligation. This amounts to local governments imposing a local option sales tax which brings a dedicated matching share of the state sales tax, and then having most of the growth in these funds put back into the state general fund. It is also contrary to the Governor's stated purpose of disconnecting state and local finances. The League strongly objects to this line -item veto and will work for re- enactment of the vetoed section early in the 1992 session. What the Veto Does Not Do *The veto does NOT reduce aids payable in 1991 and 1992. *The veto does NOT reduce the importance of county adoption of the local option sales tax by July 1, 1991. It is still true that arty county not adopting the tax will lose far more in county, city, and township aids than it saves on the sales tax. *The veto does NOT affect levy limits for 1992. Line -item veto of ]appropriations for Local Government Service Sharing and Combination Incentives Governor Carlson also vetoed the $1.5 million appropriation for incentives to local governments for start -up costs for sharing services or merging governments. He stated that financial incentives are not necessary for such efforts to occur. • 145-7 • 13 cities urge Hennepin County Board to adopt state sales tax increase �m writer Mayors, council members and ad- miaiwators fi=13 Wm' the Hennepia County HoaN y to adopt a tri.oent incesase in the mile sales tax. Without the iaaease, cities would lose $233 million in 1992, and home- owners would be forced to pay nearly t more in pmVerty taxft cease to bdp balance the state bud - pet far the two•yar period beginning m July. CoKnry oAicialt must decide by July {-whether they want to extend the increase. If they do not, cities will be forced to raise property WAS to re. The state MINN tax 11 111 rib: from 6 cents to 6% cents July 1, btlt county ofliads actors the mite must decide whether to extend the inemn into 1992. Je Le01hdm passed the in- sales tax CoaWsaN tiros pop LH coup the lost aks-tax revenues, which are returned by the state to municipalities in the form of local g�oovernment aid and property tax re- 1ef to bomeowners. At a news conference in front of the Ijennepin County Government Cen- ter in Minneapoli& city officials said the cuts would man serious prob. kms. Minneapolis City Council Member Steve Cramer raid that the city would lose $83 million and that the council would be forced to raise taxes by more than 70 percent. Taxes on a 577,604 house, the average in Minne- apolis. would rise by $300 next year. Other * artyy officials told similar tales; Robbinsdak Mayor Joy Robb said that property taxes there would in- crease 42 percent next year if the sales tax increase were rescinded. "To not enact the mks tax would be a bad financial decision for the tax- payers of Minneapolis," Cramer said. The decision is a po1°tical pick for the County Hard. which is Graced with approving a tax increase that will do little to support services pro. vided by the county. Cities will re- ceive 76 percent of the $233 million Sales tax continued on page 68 generated by the W-cat increase, AOk while the county receives only 24 percent. "I don't know what were lint to do," said Commissioner John Derus. "Tberes a lot of mixed reactio On behalf of the County Hoard. but per - sonally. rm kaniry towards (retain - ing) it myself" • 14ko . W DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT A -2309 Government Center • HENNEPIN Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 -0239 Phone: ( 612 348 -6509 612 FAX: ) 348.9777 May 24, 1991 M: Recycling Coordinators ffn MAY 2 9 199 The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a MODEL POLICY PROMOITING THE USE OF MATERIALS WITH`RE The implementation such policies will help "close the loop" in recycling and ensure markets for materials collected for recycling. Call me if you have any questions about the policy. Very truly yours, Carl Michaud Recycling Program Manager Enclosures 0 HENNEPIN COUNTY on equal opportunity employer Pa!NTP) r,)N AECYCt") PAPER ly t f The Hennepin County 9oard of Commissioners encourages each City to adopt such a policy to promote the purchase and use of materials with recycled content in construction projects. Each City that adopts such a policy by July 1, 1991 is eligible to receive an additional 10 percent reimbursement for its recycling program expenses. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 90- 11 -842R1 The following resolution was offered by Commissioner Spartz, seconded by Commissioner Sivanieh: WHERw, Hennepin County wishes to encourage municipalities to purchase materials with recycled content and to use such materials in the construction or remodeling of municipal facilities, thus encouraging the development of markets for materials with recycled content. BE IT RESOLVED, That Section IV., Method of County Reimbursement for Program Expenses, of the 1591 Funding Assistance Policy for Source Separated Recyclables be changed to the following: IV. He= or Q ILINTY REI! FM PFCG M EXPE ZES The rate of reimbursement for the municipal recycling program is as follows: 1991 Percent Percent 1992 Percent Percent Residential County Residential County Abatement rtindinq* Abatement mint >16 70% >18 70% >14 60% >16 60% >12 508 >14 50% >10 401 >12 401 <10 O% <12 Ot • Y � S •a= * An additional 108 financial incentive is offered to municipalities which have adopted by July 1, 1991, comprehensive procurement policies and specification policies for publicly funded construction or remodeling projects which give equal or preferential consideration to materials with recycled content. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That Hennepin County will develop a model policy for municipal guidance. jbA question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were Seven YEAS and as follows: COUNTY OT HFA4WIN BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSIONIM YEA NAY OTHER Jeff Spartz X _ Randy Johnson r •7chn Keefe X John E. Derus 7 Tad Jude x — Mark Andrew X Sam S. Sivanieh, Chairman X RESOLUTION ADOPTED. ATTEST: C er e e Count Board • tJ 2'J i�a0 PAGE 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL DA IL • I — . , T k MODEL POLICY PROMOTING THE USE OF MATERIALS WITH RECYCLED CONTENT IN PUBLICLY FUNDED CONSTRUCTION AND REMODELING PROJECTS RECYCLING PROGRAM HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA May 22, 1991 s 1443 • The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners wishes !:o encourage municipalities, where•+er practical and appropriate, to purchase and /or promote the use of materials with recycled content for incorporation in the constructioi or remodeling of municipal facilities. thus encouraging the de"lopment of markets for materit with recycled c%mtent. This market development is essential in the effort to ''close the ,00p" cf recycling, by encouraging the development of products that use recycled material. To quality for a full 80 percent reimbursement on eligible 1991 : ecycling costs, the Board (Resolution 90- 11- 842R1) is requiring that cities adapt comprehensive procurement and svecificatiun policies for publicly funded constniction and remodeling projects which give reasonable ark appropriate consideration to materials with recycled content. The policy must be adopted by : -Ay 1, 1991 to be eligible for full 80 percent reimbursement. Publicly funded projects include facilities that are owned and operated by public agencies and facilities that would be owned and Is operated by others and supported by prblxc funds or obl..gationa. The effort to "close the loop" can be accomplished when a City Council and its administration are committed to encouraging consideration of, and where appropriate, specification and/or purchase of construction materials with racy-.led content for use in publicly funded projects. Recycled content means product mach with some post - consumer waste. Post- cons-Mier waste is an Item that has already served its intended purpose. Hennepin County has developed a model policy to provide guidance to cities. The adoption of this policy, or one similar to it will fulfill the requiraments of the funding policy in order to qualify for 80 percent reimbursement of eligible recycling costs. Ncy IP I • • -A C* M . • GOA *- To ensure, wherever practical and appropriate, that materials with recycled content are used in the cons uction or remodeling of municipal facilities, for the City of , the council requires that: 1. Within twelve months, subsequent to the effective date of this policy, the Purchasing Agent of the City o` _ �c7 "°•� conduct a review of existing construction or remodeling projects and service specifications to determine whether such specifications promote or exclude the use of recycled products, reusable products, or products designed to he recyc=led, for use by department agencies, offices, boards, and commissions. 2. In the event that such specifications prohibit or otherwise exclude the use of recycled products, such exclusions or requirements should be eliminated unless the oprrating department or entity car_ reasonably demonstrate that the recycled product would be impractical, is unproven, or would not achieve necessary performance or design standards. 3. Within the same 12 month period, all City departments and agencies must make recommendations to the Purchasing Agent to ensure that performance standards and specifications for products used in construction or remodeling of municipal facilities do not prohibit the use of products with recycled content. Departments are to initiate or rerommend policy changes to ensure that specifications incorporate a requirement which promotes use of .materials and products with recycled content wherever practical and appropriate, or they must reasonably demonstrate that either the performance requirements of the product will be compromised or that a product with recycled content is impractical or will otherwise negatively impact health, safety or operational efficiency. t o 1 kr 4. Contractors bidding to provide products or services to the City, must ant the intent of requirements described in Paragraph 3. 5. The City will cooperate with neighboring City, County, and State governments in an effort to develop consistent, and effective procurement efforts which promote the use of recycled products in construction materials wherever practical and appropriate. 6. All related City departments and agencies will work cooperatively to further the purposes =sf the Resolution. The City's economic development process will incorporate the "goal" of promoting the use of recycled material. 7. The City's Purchasing Agent shall submit an Annual Report, to be filed with U a City Clerk, with a copy to the Clerk to the Hennepin County am. 1, which overview `he use of construction materials with recycled content which ar - ed .n he construction or remodeling of municipal facilities. • • 1T /I For June 11, 1991 Council Meeting 0 June 6, 1991 LICENSE RENEWALS -- Expire 6- 30 -91. New License Period 7 -1 -91 to 6- 30 -92. Approval contingent upon all required forms, insurance, etc. being turned in, taxes and water for the property being paid plus the approval of Police Chief Harrell and where necessary the appropriate department. Off -Sale Beer Al b Alma's Supper Club Brickley's Market PDQ Store #0292 SuperAmerica #4194 On - Sale Beer Al 6 Alma's Supper Club House of Moy Mound Lanes Club License American Legion #398 VFW #5111 Sunday On -Sale Liquor VFW #5113 Set -Up P ermit Al 6 Alma's Supper Club On -Sale Wine Al b Alma's Supper Club House of Moy !yt 7 f rC JUN 6 199'1 McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 1505023rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 It June 5, 1991 Mr. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Aanager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota 1990 Lift Station Improvements MFRA #8635 Dear Ed: Telephone Engineers 612476 -6010 Planners 612;476 -8532 FAX Surveyors Enclosed is Northwest Mechanical's Final Payment Request in the amount of $2,099.30 for the 1990 Lift Station Improvements. Because this work is fully completed, we do not recommend that any amount be retained, except for the liquidated damages. As per our previous discussions, we have assessed the Contractor liquidated damages in the amount of $1,000.00, for not completing this project in the time agreed upon in the original contract and the approved time extension. We have reviewed this project with your Utility Superintendent and find that the work was done in accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation that the Contractor be paid the amount of $2,099.30 which is full payment for this project after deducting $1,000.00 for liquidated damages. If you have any questions or need 9 ` 4 .tional information, please contact US. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:jmj Enclosures • • PAYMENT REAL* NO. 4 (FINAL) , CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA 1990 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS MFRA 18635 CONTRACTOR ENGINEER Northwest Mechanical, Inc. McComb:. Frank Roos Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 40 15050 23rd Avenue North Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 LONTRACT PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED COMPLETED ITEM QUANTITY PRICE COMPLETED THIS PERIOD TO DATE TOTAL 1. Lift Station P1 L.S. $ 42,000.00 98% 2% 100% $ 42,000.00 2. Lift Station E1 L.S. $ 48,000.00 99% 1% 100% $ 48,000.00 3. Change Order No. 1 L.S. $ 285.00 100% 0% 100% $ 285.00 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 90,285.00 $ 90,285.00 Total Work Completed Through 05 -31 -91 $ 90,235.00 Less Retainage (0%) $ 0.00 Subtotal S 90,285 OG Less Previous Payment $ 87 185.00 Subtotal $ 3;099. Less Liquidated Damages $ 1,000.00 Amount of Payment Request No. 3 $ 2,099.30 I hereby certify that this estimate is true and correct. NORTHWEST MECHANI INC. B l� U Date: Ppproved and recommended for final payment In the amount of $2,099.30. MCCOMBS FRAM( ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA By: Date: McCombs Frank Roos AnocW%% Ina ]S050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Mlnneeots 55447 Telephone Enpin"re 612/476.6010 Planners 612/476.8532 FAX Surveyors June 5, 1991 Mr. Edward . J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound, Minnesota 1991 Lift Station Improvements Payment Request ho. 1 MFRA +x9629 Dear Ed: Enclosed is LaTour Construction's Payment Request No. i for work completed through May 31, 1991 on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $20,408.20. Also enclosed is Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $2,660.32, for the additional work required at Station B -3 because of a defective gate valve and the deeper forcemain. We have reviewed the request, find that it is in order and recommend • payment in the above amount to the Contractor. We are also recommending approval of Change Order No. 1. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:jmj Enclosures • 1470 ; An Eawl OpWuniry Employer m m a m 0 0 ct Q ti U1 w 0 U U U s .v m ti m r •a PAYMENT ALT NO. 1 CITY OF W;Y.J, MINNESOTA 1991 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS WHA 09629 - ^'TRACTOR LaTour Construction, Inc. Route 1, Bcx 76 Maple Lake, Minnesota 5x%358 0 McComb Frw* Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 CONTRACT ITEM QUANTITY PRICE PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED COMPLETED THIS PERIOD COMPLETED To DATE TOTAL 1. 2. Lift Station 83 L.S. Lift Station C3 L.S. $ 43,250:00 5 44,785.00 0% 10% a% 10X S 4,325.00 3. 4. Lift Station E2 L.S. S 42,800.00 lOxS OX 9% LOX 9% S 4,478.50 S 3,852.00 5. Lift Station F1 L.S. Lift Station J1 L.S. 5 41,800.00 $ 40,765.00 0% 5% OX 5% S 2 6. Change Order No. 1 L.S. REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $ 2 S�1d,� lox Ox 100% 10x IOC% 5 4,076.50 S A 2 ,6 60.32 . $ 21,48 Orriginal Contract Amount $213,400.00 Total Mork Completed Through 05 -31 -91 $ 21,482.32 Change Order No. 1 (ADD) Revised Contract Amount $ 2 .32 $216 ,060.32 Less Re tainage (5%) Subtotal 5 074.12 Payments to Date Amount Remaining on Contract $ 20 408.20 $195,652.1 Less Previous Payment Amount 5 5 0.00 of Payment Request No. 1 5 20,408. I hereby certify that this estimate is true and correct. Approved and recommended for paywent in the amount of =20,408.20. LaTOIR CONSTRUCTION, INC. By: Date: McCOMM FRANK RROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. / Date: — CITY OF MOUND, MINESOTA By: Date: McCombs Frank Roos Associate, Inc. 15050 23rd Avenue North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Telephone E ngineer 611476 -6010 Planners 612/476 -8532 FAX surveyors June 6. 1991 Mr. Edward J. Shukle. Jr., City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound. Minnesota Tuxedo Boulevard Reconstruction MSAP 145 - 101 -07 Payment Request No. 1 MF"RA #9251 Dear Ed: Enclosed is G.M.H. Asphalt's Payment Request No. 1 for work completed through June 5, 1991 on the subject p roject. The amount of this payment request is $11,739.57• We have reviewed this request, find that it is in order and recommend . payment in the above amount to the Contractor. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact US. Very truly yours. McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. �7-- John Cameron JC:jnj Enclosures • t ' A 0 1 X An EQUal OM)Oflunfty Employer CON M CTOF F•Wti' Fl.rE �� 1 CITr r,. - °•0. h? • : -4 - TV-,-bp El. V 1 7 4.' ;7 W INEER: McCOMBS Fiat: =' cly;13 CC4JPaC T . C�u 15050 2:'r�D r:.• W. Plrrc.:y r.G_ 17 : 09,/0-3/91 -- LNYT;.•. " FF► ESTIO -!7E c,�.._• -- # # * # # # # # * * * * i * # * # * * # * * * THIS PERK : iO UTE FORK MiPLETED RECONSTRt-:TI 04 "W"ZOO Vj'. E06PD 12 -H7.6 12,357.x: hATEPIALS ON SITE RFCCO!STPUCTUP C, Tir:,ErO F- -EVARD 0.�: --------- - - - - -- --------------- ADIU T:O TOTAL 1? ;:-,.: :' :,7 ,As LESS RETAINAGE - 0% PA- culgi:c-, S% CURD = ;;T c1'.8' E17. E --------- - - - - -- --------------- TOTAL AMOURT DUE FOR VOPW CGOPUTr9 TO DATE 1i,7?_+.r 1:,739.57 TOTAL P. lt4uE- - 11,7. �.� 11,7339.57 �- ++ P,r-'FROVED• iJ EWCINEE` ` :'N'S FRANV. Gr .'JTRH T;, r, • -• CCr _.0 P _ Cis I`173 BILLS - - - - -- -JUNE 11, 1991 • BATCH 1053 BATCH 1054 57,603.75 144,776.07 TOTAL BILLS 202,379,$2 • Iy.?y PAM 1 PURCHASE JOURNAL CAN 5 AP -M-01 CITY OF MOUND TIME k VE1�1 INVOICE DUE H0.0 PRE -PAID C ND. INVOICE NMR DATE DATE STATUS AMU'.11T DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK 1 i A0410 PRE -PAID 29.00 AMI NO-SKIP 01 -LO20 -4120 3/30/91 5/30/91 29.00 JRK-CD 1010 29.00 31703 `. Asm OF lETROPOLITN HUNK* VEND011 TOTAL 29.00 60549 PRE -PAID 1,653.69 LID 71 -7100 -9510 5/30/91 5/30/91 1,653.69 JRNL -CD 1010 1653.69 31693 `- MUM CORPORATION VEWR TOTAL 1653.69 80746 PRE-PAID 350.00 DARE-LIMOND 6/3 -14 ?1.4140 -4110 5/30/91 5/30/91 350.0 JRNL-CD 1010 350.00 31692 BUREAU W CRIMINAL APPREFN VENDOR TOTAL 350.00 00888 PIE -PAID 3,587.00 CR UNION 5/25 PR 01-2040 - 0000 5/30/91 5/30/91 3,587.00 JRK. -CD 1010 3587.00 31721 CITY COl6RT CREDIT UNION VENDOR TOTAL 3587.00 Clool PIE -PAID 57.72 APR SALES TAX 73 7,980.22 APR SALES TAX 71- "3.t- 'Z-0000 5/30/91 5/30/91 8,037.94 JRN- -CD 1010 8037.94 31691 PRE-PAID 2,536.86 SIT 5125 PR 01-2040 -0000 • 5/30/91 5/30/91 2,536.86 JRNL -CD 1010 2536.86 31714 COMMISSIONER OF REVEME VENDOR TOTAL 10574.80 01235 PRE -PAID 1,511.10 JUNE DENTAL 01 -0004 18.00 ME DENTAL - RETIREE 01-4190 -1510 45.90 JUNE DENTAL - RETIREE 01-4 2S0-1510 45.90 JUNE DENTAL - RETIREE 01 63.90 JUNE DENTAL RETIREE 71 7100 - 1 5/30/91 3/30/91 1,684.80 JRNL 1(14 1684.80 31729, ` DELTA DENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 1684.80 01362 PREPAID 51.00 TOPPER FOR ANI!1AL TRUCK 01- 41q.'� 5/30/91 5/30/91 519.00 JRNL -CD 1010 519.00 3160 DURA TOP VENDOR TOTAL 519.00 E1429 PRE -PAID 147.00 LIO 940.00 MINE 2.94- DISC 5/30/91 5/30/91 1,034.06 JF%X-CD ;.,ir; ?ie3q, +6 1 116 0 6 PREPAID ?b7.00 LIO ': 7: ?:O 0 328.6 MINE 7.34- DISC 51 C. 11 688.31 M - CD :` i' r ? 31710 ` ED PHILLIPS b SONS VENDOR TOTAL 117:.37 /p $ 3 3r d `o,?i - 7 3 - ul�`5 cSi -F'A :i' 1,5:'�,.ov DEF CJ� `. %.5 F,; »,", :.�.,., 1 y ?S PAM 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE M- 002.01 CITT OF MM TIML i; VEN�R INVOICE ME HOLD PRE - V ID NO. INVOICE ON DATE DATE STATUS MOUNT OEVIPTION ACCOlXT KFMER AlfM CHECK # 5/30/91 5/30/% 1,620.00 JK-0 1010 1620.00 3110` • OREAT NOT LIFE ASSURANCE VENDOR TOTAL 1620.00 01971 PRE -PAID 24.11 HN DED 5/25 PR G1 -:410 -0000 5/30/91 5/30/91 24.11 JK - CD 1010 24.11 317.4 • OIDUP HEALTH PLAN VOW TOTAL. 24.11 01972 PRE -PAID 92.00 NINE 71- 7100 -95''0 . DISC 71-7100-44 2.45 FRT 71-7100-9640 5/30/91 5/30/91 93.53 JRK-CD 1010 ? , 5w 314.Q4 c • PRE-PAID 628.80 LIO 71-7100-9510 %6.35 NINE 71 22.24 DISC 71. 7100 - 9560 20.9 F1RT 71-7100-9600 5/30/91 5/30/9[ 1,393.00 AL-CD 1010 1593.00 31708 5 • ORIOOS COOPER i COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 1686.53 M2145 PRE -PAID - 657.23 5/25 PR OED 01 -2040 -0000 5/30/91 5/30/91 657.23 AL 1010 657.23 31716 VM CO 9UPPOtT i MLLECT# VENDOR TOTAL 657.23 0 M2160 PREPAID 1,313.26 21 LOANS- MAR,APR 16-1040 -0000 5/30/91 5/30/91 1,313.26 JRK-CO 1010 1313.26 3172 HE M CO TREASURER VENDOR TOTAL 1313.26 12301 PRE -PAID 540.44 DEF COMP 5/25 PR 01- 2040 -WXC 5/30/91 5130/91 540.44 JRK-CD 1010 `40. 3171 ` ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 VENDOR TOTAL 540.44 12304 PRE -PAID 103.87 IN 30 PR 01-200-0000 5/30/91 5130/91 103.87 EM. -CD 1010 103.87 3171 ICMA RETIROM TRUST -401 VENDOR TOTAL 103.87 J2571 PRE -PAID 580.00 80 CONTRACT HOURS 01- 4 - 5/30/91 5/30/91 ,`•20.00 ,RK•CD 1010 5=i.� JOHN TAFFE VENDOR TOTAL :30.00 J�579 PRE -PAID 16 0 .75 LIG 71 7140 -951 952.00 WINE 7! - 71 X - '�2� DISC 71 1100 -9`r 5/30/91 1,114.76 VL -CD 10;'� PPE -PAID 211.45 LIQ 365. WINE 71 71 ' :0.03- DISC 71- 7190 - ci0 (,� fl.v 1 5!30/ 1 1 1t 1,157.61 Alt-CD PAGE 3 PURC3ASE JOURNAL DATE 5 AP -0O2 -01 CITY OF MOUND TIi1E 1: VLF INVOICE DUE HOLD ND. INVOICE NW DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION PRE -'AID C AIxQ)dT NtlMBER AMW CHECK 8 JOHN BROS LIQUOR CO YENDfIFt TOTAL 2272.17 L, PREPAID 50.00 UNION 5/25 PR 01 -2040 -0000 # 5/30/91 5/30/91 50.00 ,1X -CD 1010 50.00 31727` 5 LAM ENFORCED. LABOR SER} VENDOR TOTAL 50.00 ml PRE-PAID 11,2 FIT 5/25 PR 01.040 -0000 5/30/91 5/30/91 11,290.50 J X -CD 1010 11290.50 31713 5 MAMITTE BANK - MOUND VENDOR TOTAL II'In.50 M AO PRE -PAID 107.I6 H07 DED 5/25 PR 01-2040 -()W 5/30/91 5/30/91 : JRPL -CD 1010 107.16 31725 5 'ED CENTER HEALTH PLAN VENDOR TOTAL 107.16 M3118 PRE -PAID 10.00 MEMA MTG 01.4140 -4120 31 5/30191 3/30/91 10.00 JRNL -CD 1010 10.00 31702 5 fm VENDOR TOTAL 10.00 M3250 PRE -PAID :30.04 APR GAS 01- 4320 -?720 "7.47 APR �-=+S 01-4340 -3720 0 260.45 APR GAS 22- 4170-3720 61.05 APR GAS 71- 1100-3720 71.74 APR GAS 01-4.'80 -3720 40.76 APR GAS 73-7300 -3720 50'54 APR GAS 78-7809-3720 5/30/91 5/30M 842.05 XC -CD 1010 842.05 31699 5 MINNEGASCO VENDOR TOTAL 842,05 M3401 PRE - PAID .8.00 Dc= c3tlp 1/25 FP, 01 - 0000 5/30/91 5/ -V /91 3.S. "JO JP!c%rC 1010 328.00 31720 ` MN RITIREMENT SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL M M34w` PRE - PAID 5/30/91 5/4)/91 651,00 31726 ` MN TEk'1STERS LOCAL '20 VE jXj TGTA' "'A` PREPAID �- .. A: `0 .00 31kln ` MN Tr `tSPOPT:'iON rr��n ;�,�: •: ��,. CITY COUNCIL PACKET - 6 =11 -91 #2 '9 �yy �h ` �y e y y Syr P:URtNittf JO11 RVA L r 5'�rf a u � � a wm IN NU i 111 t WE we sam NIk w flEUIPTIpl 11CII�tt 11>!i� 7 " F 5190191 5/30191 1v.00 JIK-CO 1010 1R ,. m aim LIFE VE1�1>R 1011!4 15.40 PME -1Mt0 6,021.51 PERM 5/2S PR 01- 2040.0004 5131/91 5/30/91 6 JR16, -CD 1014 11�t.3I 314 E, a VLF TOTAL 682I.51 PRE -Pg1A 21.03 AEPL€Elt P/C -LIG 71 -7100 -2200 5/30191; 5/3019t 21.83 JRNL-CD 1010 21.83 3012.;"" GL+ 1 VEIw TOTAL 21.83 PIE -06ty 631.50 HDr 5/25 PR a1- 204o -11v0o 5130/91 `5/34/9! b37.30. JLtL-t31 1010 0.50 3171}3 � ,' IF 0 00 MAL &V. so y 2,368.67 LID 71-71"10 90.35 NILE 7l -71;00 -9320 SS.7r- DISC �l- 7100.9560 " f 5130191 5/30191, 2,428.15 JR11. -00 1010 2A28.15 mo ME - PAID 2,101.30 LID 71- 1'140 -9510 204.10 MITE 41. 7100 -9520 � ,; 44.33- DISC 71- 7100.4560 17.95 MIX 714100-9540 5/301191 5/30/91 2,2!15.33 JR14;�0 1010 2385.33 31711 LSIAI.>t1T MME f WIRITS liltm TOTAL. 5213.48 tP12S7 PRE- PAID 9$.52 AUCTIONEER-POLICE AUTION 01- 3642 -0000 5130/91 5/30/91 98.51 JtN. 0 1010 90.52 3170? ROTA`!' PA1U5#UL VENDOR TOTAL 98.52 042* PRE -PAID 626.64 S6 CONlTRACT HOURS 01 -4310 -3100 5/30/91 5/30/91 626.64 JRN4-CD 1010 626.04 31 I'm t TLIIMEltT E JOHNSON VENDOR TOTAL 676.64 $4511 PTO -PAID 548.92 CR UNION 5/25 PR 01- 2040.0000 5/30191 5/30/91 50BX .Atli -CD STATE CAPITOL CREDIT UNION VENDOR TOTAL 54600 PRE -PAID 5/3001 5/30191 STREICHER'S Iy1E 508.92 475.15 CONVERSION -SQUAD 842 54.00 TEAR WA CHIEFS CAR 458.95 BUILD UP CHIEF'S CAR nq.10 JRNL -CD VENDOR TOTAL ml .10 TOTAL ILL VENDORS 57,60 ?.75 1010 548.9." 3I72 i 01-4140-M 01-4140-`,000 01. 1 :40.5000 1010 936.10 310 10S3 AMY DfISTDISON VENDOR TOTAL 32.12 AM. 108.30 DEADBOLT LOCK -IP 01-4340.2330 6/06/91 6/06/91 10E.30 JP,N1.-CD 1010 i AM SECURITY INC VENDOR TOTAL, 108.X AO 16 250.00 PICTURES 34- 6000 -4100 h /3619! 6'06' 1 250,00 Jp%-CD 1010 k IM MO icy WO , AL +y 1iii §� ;�� •' sa ► an �.1' uo n CS.46 ,cwt. IM m Ift 4S. 00 t 44.E rar "r olzea- �ov.w of W -" 01 -4o-m � Wo9/ti. 21.12 .. '.lob COOT TO COAST C0970 6/06/91 6/06191 VENDOR TOTAL 6/06/91 6/06/91 COCA COL4 BOTTLING- VENDOR TOTAL 17.00 NAT MME SU'PL 01- 4320.2200 71.70 MAT 01E SUPP1. 01 -4340 -2300 1.49 MAY WE RM 22. 4170 °2200 29.67 MAY HONE 51M 73- 7300-2200 35.79 MAY HD11E S11F'Pl 73-7300.2260 135.66 ^�... OF WA 73.7300 -2300 32.34 MAY HDME RM 78- 7200 -2200 WE mu J O L -CD 1010 1 �' son go v am mm; am BESGIorloM ATI3BMIT � 3'�.ak r, x ANC ow so em TOTAL 214.12 134.60 NAT BA MINE 22-4lW2210 6/OiJl 6/g1i91 134.60 JMI. -0 101@ 4 * IIC. meat WAL 154. k' oil 313.36 MAT SIMUTE SEIWICE 01- 13i0+"OQ d ' pp 6/01/!1...6J86/41 313.56 JK-CB 1014' wAm mms IIBI=tm an n MAL 313.56 ` wra 1 ,010. 00 148x to * 7300 -2 10 Il/ObJl1 11 1,010.00 j.-t1 101© IM On" WM TOTAL 1010.00 _ ma 1 T11E 7t *710!0.4148 , 4 64M 6^01 230.00 JMB, -M 1080 ON BI` A1+1xBt,,TOBAC,FI# IEW TOTAL 230.00 CMD 241.00 WON RE6ISTM 71- 7100.3WO 39.95 RMISIER TAPE 71- 710-20 610bAi 6/06/91 280.95 Pub-CB 1010 CA611also SALES 11DBI01 TOTAL 280.93 cm 20.58 NITER BILL-U0 STORE,' 71- 7100.3740 6/06/'91 61OW91 20.38 JNL -C11 1010 CITY OF MOMO VEWOR TOTAL 20.50 00440 26.20 MA RUG RENT 71- 7100-4210 6/06/91 6/04/91 28.20 JRNL-CD 1010 CLEAN STEP RENTAL VENDOR TOTAL 28.20 tJ0960 14.29 MAY WE St1APl 01-4290 COOT TO COAST C0970 6/06/91 6/06191 VENDOR TOTAL 6/06/91 6/06/91 COCA COL4 BOTTLING- VENDOR TOTAL 17.00 NAT MME SU'PL 01- 4320.2200 71.70 MAT 01E SUPP1. 01 -4340 -2300 1.49 MAY WE RM 22. 4170 °2200 29.67 MAY HONE 51M 73- 7300-2200 35.79 MAY HD11E S11F'Pl 73-7300.2260 135.66 MAY HONE SUPPL 73.7300 -2300 32.34 MAY HDME RM 78- 7200 -2200 357.94 J O L -CD 1010 357.94 611.91 WIT MIX 611.91 JRNL-CD 611.91 71- 7100.9540 1010 IYg( 1430 71.49 MCIA CONE -NnE 01- LNO.4110 6106/91 6106/61 71.40 JRNI -CD 1010 N' NWrvY!I; G + WE two MW MMPTM AC1 - r id 2,290.00 TANI AR MM(L 22 . 0,. 2^46 At 4 ' u suo . 14.30 C1P16Tt !MINT 73. 404N1 t/Od1 1 4. 50 JN11.-C6 1014 Room em 10TAL 14.30 43.00 OA�'ET MEAN 71 -]100 -0110 �"� 1 bl�06191 49.01! dM1. . f Cz vow TOTAL 95,04 7,0Ci3.41 !� 11� 7t -7100 -9330 7.45.01 JK- 3910 4 - 1 T I.11 Im 116.38 is Nm SEMI Cl'1I11NAl.T 56.29 AM AM 1010 MW C01lTIIiICT 3 y � y 9 � 12A J11E Ma W& W � 0 l 1�431 A 0 - vi �14Y�.77JV 12.06 AM N1M10 SN dMt ICI E!i- +12 3 74.8 im 11A010 so cm7m 12.96 A* wto StMV cC4fma 01- 4OW3930 60.30 AK MM SM CC4t1?= 73- 7300 -3950 . 28.14 JJE NAD 881V tM -79933 0 2 .14 im Mo t o SERA CONTNA .� . 22 4170 6106/91 402.00 at-co 1020 KWON l ll 8108 . 41 KWON., OF NIMS , VC. vQNllti TOTAL /AL 402.00 01320 417.00 NAT' DIJIF SAM 22 - 4170 -1370 6/061!1 6/08/41 417.x0 AL-0 1010 BMIIS !I 8#tr1,'E VENDOR TOTAL 417.00 01330 195.00 SOO 01.4340 -2350 6!06191 6/%/9t 195.00 JRN -CD 1010 g011'S 5011 SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 195.00 D1360 300.00 pb'PtiALI- SPILLNAT IN PARK 01. 4340 -2300 3,600.00 ASPHALT REPAIRS- TUXEDO 78- 7800 -3800 6/06/91 6/06/91 3,900.00 J K -CD 1010 MMM ASP KT CO*ANT VENDOR TOTAL 3900.00 E1420 9,385.95 MAY BEER 71- 7100 -9530 6/06/91 6/06/91 9,385.95 JRN. -CD 1010 EAST SIDE KWAGE VENDOR TOTAL 93£5195 1430 71.49 MCIA CONE -NnE 01- LNO.4110 6106/91 6106/61 71.40 JRNI -CD 1010 PMACNik#E J118RMAL on IV ps on '' +€ FF IB M m law MTV Bane AMWf1'.. noIp"I"I01 Ate' MME � '�• r 't"s, f r � VOW TOTAL 71.40 �S i FlM 118.63' YXIM.COMIECTIl11l1 73- 730023D0 } 6506/9! 6/116/9t 118.0 JrL 1010 FM R119 CI QS VEMAa1 TOTAL 118.07 11690 18.86 MT Nix 71- 710@ -9510 165.57 NAT Nisc , 71- 7100-9S30 24.14 PAP 71- 71002200 k 6/06/91 6106191 $13.92 jw-m 1410 FClk STAR SAS StMI VE1m wit 216.93 111748 74.00 CABINET F111 TAIEIt 73-73p8.4100 6106191 al06/91 74.00 JK-CD 1010 8 >18 ow". W. 70.00 0 296.33 MT MOLL SALARY 32 -41*1= 6196191 6/06191 256.33 SA-M 1410 i#6 vET81C1R TOTAL 258.33 61890 41.40 NAT NAM COOLER 01- 41404100 45.70 MT NRYER COOLER 01- 90 -;1200 12.20 MT "TER COOLER 01-4290.2200 3.00 MT MATER Comm 73-7300-220 5.00 MT WER COMM 78- 7900.2200 6/06/91 6/06/91 109.30 jK-C9 1010 mom INILEMO VEHW TOTAL 109.30 01903 129.71 PTnT 5-NAIL 1' OIME LEASE 01- 4320.5000 6106/91 6/06/91 139.71 JRIIL -CD 1010 MOOH0IE COf1MCfT MTL IMW VOW TOTAL 129.71 H12140 216.81 APR =INS FEE 01.4110.4250 6106/91 6/06/91 216.01 JRNL-M 1010 H DIN M SHERIFFS DEPT VEIEOR TOTAL 216.31 M2160 798.00 APR DOW 01.41IN250 6/06191 4106/91 798.00 J K-CC 1010 HENHI M TREASURER VENDOR TOTAL. 793.00 K244 6/06191 6106191 13.74 13.74 MAT MIX JRNL -CD 71. 7100 -9540 1010 NOME JUICE VENDOR TOTAL 13.74 I23S0 6106/91 6106/91 75.00 75.00 MFl1$ -IIMC JRNL -CD 01- 4040.4130 1010 r PANG: S PURCHASE JOURNAL IAW E K`'W4 CITY OF Pon TINE 1` VENDOR INVOICE OE IDID PRE -4AIN L • N0. INVOICE Nit DATE DATE STATUS MW DEMPTION ACCOW NUUBER AMOUNT CND( IS IN18N ATL INSTITUTE IANICt VENDOR TOTAL 75.00 12W 24.00 COPIER MINT -MT 01 -4140 -2140 6/06/91 6/06/91 24.00 AL-0 1010 IDS VENDOR TOTAL 24.00 • J2440 72.10 RUST PEaETRANT,CIEANER 01- 4290 -2250 6/O6/9I 6/06/91 T.10 JAIL-CD 1010 J 8 DISTRIBUTING VENDOR TOTAL 72.10 . J2610 117.71 COFFEE,COOKIES 01-4020 -2200 6/06/91 6/06, 117.71 JIK -W 1010 JBILEE FRCS VENDOR TOTAL 117.71 NO3D _ � _ .�' � _ � 9,990.17 !NT BEER 11 -7100 -9530 - 6/06/91 6/06/91 9,990.17 J K-M 1010 MAW VII DIS611UTOR VENDOR TOTAL 9990.17 • M3170 32,357.84 JUNE SEWER SERVICE 78- 7800 -4230 7,784.67 - JUNE SEIER SERVICE 338.17- .TIE SOD SEWICE 79- 1190-4000 78- 3812-0000 6/06/91 6/06/91 24,235.00 AL.-0 1010 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMIC VENDOR TOTAL 24235.00 lCN228 2,380.00 LIFT STA BRACKETS 78- 7800-4200 6/06 /91 6/06191 2,380.00 JRNNL -CD 1010 MIDWEST METAL VENDOR TOTAL 2380.00 • M3240 89.94 6-7 -8 PAGER REM 01-4140 -3950 6/06/91 6/06/91 89.94 JK-CD 1010 MINN COMM PAGINRG VENDOR TOTAL 89.94 M3289 756.00 MARS 888 LIGHT 22- 4:.70 -2200 161.70 SUSPENDERS,TAPE 22- 4170-2200 6/06/91 6/06/91 917.70 JRft -CD 1010 M CONWAY FIRE 6 SAFETY VENDOR TOTAL 917.70 N490 5,081.75 MAT SALARIES 22- 4.70-1390 1,167.00 MAY MAINT 22- 4170 -3190 579.50 MAY DRILLS 22 -4170 t3?A 3 6106/°1 6/06/91 6,", .25 JRNE-CD 1010 MOM FIRE DEPARTMENT VE"POR TOTAL 6°28.25 "� M3500 5,573.33 XE FIRE PELIE� F;NSION 6/06/91 6/06/x 5,573.33 JR11. -CD 1010 01- 4140 -3100 1010 01 -4140 -3140 1010 01- L3041t0 1010 73- 7300-4110 70- 78004110 1010 01 -4280 -2360 141'. 01- 4280-2310 1010 01-4280 -3710 01-.4340 -3710 01-4320 -3710 71-7100-3710 22- 4170 -3710 73-7300.3710 78- 7800-3710 1010 01.4230 -3710 1010 54- 5600 -61:0 1010 71-7100-9540 1013 iydt C ` PURCHASE JOURNAL x"01 CITY OF !!ulCD YBIr� INVOICE DUE Na0 N0. INIJOItE MRR DAZE DATE STATUS AMD W KnIPTIOI WA FIRE RELIEF M YMM TOTAL M,33 i N3510 357.25 PHYSICAL- C?RISTENSON 6/06/91 6106/91 357.25 JAL-0 Wn MEDICAL CLINIC VENDOR TOTAL 357.25 M3S10 50.80 C}ER ANALYSIS 6/06/91 6106.'91 50.80 JANL -CD WLS HEALTH DEPT VENDOR TOTAL 50.80 NA96 290.00 WA MINT SClQOL-FKJQ ER 6/06/91 6106/91 290.00 AL-CO NAIL RECREATION I PARK ASS VENOM TOTAL 290.00 ' ' - ma . 93- .10 VIDEO TRAINING PKS _ _ " _ _ ___ . -. z _ _ . - 93.10 VIDEO TRAINING PKG 6/06/91 6/06/91 186.20 JANL-CD NAT'L SAFETY COLKIL Vow TOTAL 186.20 0 N3740 83.99 NO PARK SIGNS 6/06M 6/06/91 83.95 JAN. -CO Nom 5196 VE10Ot TOTAL 83.99 NV41 466.95 STARTER FOR IDLER 6/06/91 6/06/91 466.95 JANL -CD NIOG SO1 CO. VENDOR TOTAL 466.95 N3800 440.26 MAT ELECTRICITY 84.62 MAT ELECTRICITY 812.22 MAY ELECTRICITY 396.40 MAY ELECTRICITY 243.30 MAY ELECTRICITY 1,813.01 MAY ELECTRICITY I,477.13 MAY ELECTRICITY 6/06/91 6/06/91 5,266.94 JAN. -CD NORTHERN STATES POWER CO VENDOR TOTAL 5266.94 N= 4,957.57 MAY STREET LIGHT ELEC. 6/06/91 6/06/91 4,957.57 JfRN1 -CD NORTHERN STATES POWER VENDOR TOTAL 4957.57 N3$22 315.00 TIF BOND FEE 6/06/91 6/06/91 315.00 JRNCL -CD NHORWEST BANK M, N.A. VENDOR TOTAL 315.00 P4000 28.:3 MAY 141X 6/06/91 6 /06/91 2 .23 JRK - CD 01- 4140 -3100 1010 01 -4140 -3140 1010 01- L3041t0 1010 73- 7300-4110 70- 78004110 1010 01 -4280 -2360 141'. 01- 4280-2310 1010 01-4280 -3710 01-.4340 -3710 01-4320 -3710 71-7100-3710 22- 4170 -3710 73-7300.3710 78- 7800-3710 1010 01.4230 -3710 1010 54- 5600 -61:0 1010 71-7100-9540 1013 iydt • P4031 123.00 5-6 -7 NEP STUTSMAN 01-4190.1510 102.00 6-7 HOSP W" W$FT 01-4140.1510 95.00 6 -7 HOSP UAGIN WAFT 01- 4140-1510 6/06/91 6/%/9l 320.00 AIL-CD 1010 PMTSIrIANS OF MN VENDOR TOTAL 320.00 P4060 3,646.70 M f BEER 71 -7100 -9530 6/06/91 6/06/91 3,646.70 JRNL-CD 1010 POOIUA DISTRINtING CO YOM TOUL 3646.70 P4090 22.75 AIR VALVE 01- 4280-2310 6/06!91 6/06/91 22.75 JRNL-0 1010 - lm au E!#EPMEtiT -C9 , is= TOTAL 22.75 - 1�4197 3, 200.00 ALTITUDE MOM VALVE 73 7300 - 5000 6/06/91 6/06/91 3,200.00 AIL- 1010 R.E. NOW I ASSOC. VET48l>it TOTAL 3200.00 R4198 12.67 118 GENERATOR - VALVE 22- 4170 -2200 6/06/91 6/06/91 12.67 JK-CO 1010 R.E. EIECTRIC VENDOR TOTAL 12.67 R4209 104.67 MAT GARBAGE -C HALL 01- 4320 -3750 6/06/91 6/06/91 104.67 JRNL -CD 1010 NOT'S SANITATION Yom TOTAL 104.67 • R4230 5.00 ID CARD - NELSON 01 -2300 -0220 6/06/91 6/06/91 5.00 J K -CD 1010 KIDENTIFICATIONS VENDOR TOTAL 5.00 R4280 200.00 MAY ASST CHIEF SALARY 22 -4.70 -1370 6106/91 6/06/91 200.00 At-CO 1010 RONALD MARSCHKE VENDOR TOTAL 200.00 R4290 '.,'99.07 MAY ICE 71-7100-4`40 6/06/91 6/06/91 299.07 JRNL -CD 1010 RON'S ICE COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 299.07 S43$9 935.50 TREES,SWM -JC PROJ Oi-:';t00 -0000 6106/91 6/06/41 935.50 JRNL-CD 1010 ELINE NI.1t5E' T VENDOR TOTAL 9?5.50 .. ' 4430 4:5.00 FOTLE TAGS 71- 7100 -2:00 • M IS PURCHASE JOURNAL 6 AP-G02 -01 CITY W HOUND TIME IR V@lgOt INVOICE DUE HOLD W. INVOICE NINMt DATE DATE STATUS ANWR DWIPTIU N ACxm NR1NttENt AN1w am # 32.67 ID SAM FOR CIRNISSIO ERS 01- 4190-2200 32.68 ID NMES FOR C>aMNISSIOERS 01- 4300-2200 6/06/91 6/06/91 490.35 JRN.-0 1010 SOS PRINTING YOM TOTAL 490.35 S4580 19.50 ENT EXP -GRAND 01 -4140 -4110 6/06/91 6/06191 19.50 JRK-CD 1010 STEPHEN C,'RtMO VENDOR TOTAL 19.50 S4580 3,998.00 MIRE PAC!♦( LOT 30- 6000 -3100 '77.41 MINE PUP -TELL 7 13- 7300-4200 62.25 REPAIR SIGN NN OINE 01-4280-2360 48.50 PUP HOUSE 3 73- 7300 -42% 50.88 RECEPI BY SIGN 01 -4320 -2200 6/06/91 6106/91 4,257.04 JRK-0 1010 STFIME ELECTRIC CO YEMDOR TOTAL 4257.3 - T4716 29.75 TEMP HELP 70 -L270 -1300 6/06/91 6/06/91 29.75 JNL-CU 1010 MFORARIES TO GO VENNm TOTAL 29.75 T4770 22,549.35 FAT BIER 71- 7100 -9530 6/06/91 6/06/91 22,59.35 JRK-CO 1010 THDRPE DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL 22549.35 T4820 218.00 ABSTRACT FEES- DREANAROOD 01- 3842 -0000 i 6/06/91 6/06/91 218.00 Ji1L-CD 1010 TITLE INSURANCE CO VENDOR TOTAL 218.00 T4895 22.50 2ND APP'S LAWN CARE 73- 7300-4200 6/06/91 6/06/91 22.50 JRK -CD 1010 TOP TURF VENDOR TOTAL 22.50 T4995 101.19 LABELS 71-7100-2200 6/06/91 6/06/91 101.19 JRK-CD 1010 TWIN CITY PRICING & LABEL# VENDOR TOTAL 101.19 05100 58.26 MAY TOWELS 01-4290 -1250 94.06 MAY RUGS 73 -1300 -2200 148.29 MAY UNIFORMS 01-4280 -2240 29.68 MAY UNIFORMS 01-4290.2240 75.78 MAY UNIFORMS 73- 7300 -2240 75.78 MAY UNIFORMS 18.780 -2240 3.28 MAY RAGS 22- 4170 -2200 196.50 MAY RUGS -C HALL 01-4320 -4210 6/06191 6/06/91 681.63 JRNNI-CD 1010 UNITOG RENTAL SYSTEM VE'dMP TOTAL 681.0 • 1488 PAGE 9 PURCHASE JOURNAL AP-M -01 CITY OF ROUND r vow INVOICE RE NOLO PIE -PAID c ND. INVOICE w DATE DANE udw MW 0E9lXIIPTION ACWW NM AWK CNI3vlt 11 115430 303.60 REPAIR OAS MaiITat 78 - 78p0 -4;a0 6/06/91 6/06/91 303.60 JRNL-0 1010 MAIN PAOWTS MWO VENMR TOTAL 303.60 N5580 137.90 MAY GARBAGE 01- 4340-3150 WWI 6/06/91 137.80 JAN. -CD 1010 NEST00 SANITATION VENDOR TOTAL 137.80 i N5630 9,250.00 016 IP TUXEDO 78 -7800 -3800 682.50 STAND PIPE 73- 7300-3800 616/91 6/06/91 9,933.30 J DL-CO 1010 NIDIER INC VENDOR TOTAL 9931.50 IM90 183.32 BINDER ROCK -JC PROJ 01 -iM 0000 11.92 SANG 01- 42W2340. 1,094.25 BLACKTOP Y 73- 7300-2340 6/06/91 6/0601 1,289.69 J1K-CD 1010 • MM mum 6 MNS VENDOR TOTAL 1289.69 M5700 1,550.00 .WE RETAIV. 01-4110-3100 . 6/06/91 6/06/91 1,550.00 JUT,. -M 1010 `AURST-PEAf1SX-IARSON VENDOR TOTAL 1550.00 X515Q 56.70 XEROX 1011 -PRIK PAYOFF 01 -4420 -5000 .28 XEROX 1012-INT PAYOFF 01-4320 -6110 { 6/06191 6106/91 56.98 JK-CD 1010 XEROX CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL 56.98 16070 100.00 PAY ASST MARSHALL SALARY 22- 4.10-1310 6/06/91 6/06191 100.00 AL-CD 1010 MICHAEL PALM VENDOR TOTAL 100.00 ` TOTAL ALL VENDORS 144,776.07 • 1488 x� -cm* 13 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 City of Mound, Minnesota 1991 Lift Station Improvements MFRA #9629 Additional Cost Incurred because of defective gate valve on forcemain and greater depth of forcemain resulting in groundwater problems ADD S 2,(60.32 TOTAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 ADD $ 2,660,32 GRIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (ADD) REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT APPROVED: our Cons ction, Inc. S 213.400.00 S 2.660.32 21 ,o .32 Date: APPROVED: McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Date: / / 'ti c' J 4""'791 ACCEPTED: City of Mound, Minnesota Date: StF- M C;ITN' of N 10 , N I MEMORANDUM June 7, 1991 Mayor and City Council Peggy James, Secretary Candidates for Parks & Open Space Commission 34 : MAYWOOD P ? ,O P10GND MINNES0 i A ,'35364 {Gil:) 4'2 -11.'+ At the June 13, 1991 Parks & Open Space Commission Meeting, beginning At 7 :00 p.m. the following applicants will be interviewed for the vacancy created by Neil Weber's resignation. Neil Weber's term was due to expire 12 -93. Joy Eischeid 1749 Avocet Lane 472 -3698 Frank Matachek 2530 Ruby Lane 472 -1531 Dell Rudolph 1766 Commerce Blvd. 472 -2256 Letters of application are enclosed for your review. questions, please call me. If you have any KCQ MAY 161991 May 15, 1991 Office of the City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Park Board, I would like to apply for the open Space Advisory Commission. My husband, Mike, and myself are new residents of Mound and we sincerely love the area. Our home, which is located on Harrison Bay, has provided us with a great love for the lake and its preservation. For this reason, I would give freely my time and effort to see that we all take special care of this lovely area. At this point in my life, I have raised three daughters and ha , been involved in numerous volunteer activities. My yr ungest daughter is a stl- Lent at Purdue, and my two oldest daughters have completed college and are finding success in their chosen careers. Mike played professional football for ten years and is now senior management for the John Sexton Company in St. Louis Park. During that time, I have been active in many organizations. I've headed up heart and cancer drives, been advisors to cheerleadin and twirling squads, president of Presbyterian Women and National Institutional Food Distributors Association (NIFDA), organized "pink lady" volunteers at our former hometown hospital, taught church schoul, as well as completed advanced training in the Stephens Ministry which I taught for three years. I am not aware of the requirements needed for this worthwhile position, but I do have a desire to improve our parks and lake area for the enjoyment of all and would look forward to this opportunity. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Joy Eischeid -:r L4 Pj, el i 17--olt -000 1-.- 4L. AJ i C; L (A v I F Yo Lo P. c-e Tt-% A 0 6 )-%-) )-n I' T - t-v \Al tv SOO-, Is -- L T, S t I 0 - y — fir O-tvv - a- LA C- c -P . L Th IL h o 14-L • Q 9 - YY "a. *r 1 7. -a I TD t e_*r ?'o o o u .1 cL fit' I< e- 7-0 �n K�8Y 2419�� � May 24, 1991 Mr. Ed Shuxle, Mourm City Manager and Mound Parks & Open Space Commzsslon Dear Mr. Shukle and Corfirnissior, Members: This ,s a letter of far the vacant seat on the Mouria Parks & Open Space Commission. I would li*e to he cunsxmerec for this position and believe I have experience pius a great interest in tn�s area of community service. As you know, l served as tne wound Docx inspector for seven boating seasons avid worxed very closely with the Parks Director on many parks projects as well as the Dock Program. I am proud of the results of tMie projects sucn a� the Dock Program format, the oreoging ano rip-rap program, shoreline restoration and suggestions for various parks needs. However, there would be one restriction in my service that may be a problem wztri me as Par14. Commzsszon memoer. As you �now, I go away for several months in the winter and would nut tie avaz>ab.ie fer tr�e Fenruary, March ang April Commission w.eetzngs. materials could be maileu to me at my wxnter ang action. If the above meets the requirements of a mound Parks & Open Space I would deem it a privi)ege t:o serve in this capacity. Sxncerei.y your%, Dell R"oolp^ �766 �owwr`ce Blvo. Mourio mm 55364 472-2256 . CIT1 of NI0l. ND MEMORANDUM v DATE: June 6, 1991 TOr City Manager, Members of the City Council and Staff FROM: Jon Sutherland, Building O f f i c i a l SUBJECT: Mary 1991 Monthly Report CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY In May 43 building permits were issued for a total valuation of $614,034. This valuation Is up 52 percent from last year at this time. There were 24 plumbing, mechanical and miscellaneous permits for a total of 67 permits issued in May. This resulted in approximately 95 related inspections by this department. PLANNING b ZONING Due to Memorial Day holiday, there was only one Planning Commission meeting this month. Its agenda was filled with three variances, two subdivisions, one conditional use permit and one utility easement vacation. The workshop meeting was rescheduled to June 3rd. TRAINING & MEETINGS 1 attended one half day Board of Directors meeting for Lake Country Chapter ICBO. Other meetings were canceled due the to heavy work schedule. JS:Pj j 189 N O CITY OF MOUND 3311 Maywood iioad Mound. SIN 55364 RV"NO AC r4M aA►ORT mood .AT ' ►r 1991 • • • �� - -� ��rr��r■r�i■rr�■r�� HMO- sum �ar�rr�a o■ ME= s ��■rrrrr�r■�■ © ®® �. n ® ®� • • • CITY of MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA $5364 (612)472 -1ISS June 6, 1991 TO; Ed Shukle City Manager FROM; Geno Hoff Street Supt. SUBJECT; May's Activity Report We finished our spring sweeping the 3rd, we ended up With 272 loads of debris. ha have disposed of about half of the debris using it for fill. *We have completed the repairs on the Streets that were dug -up because of watermain breaks this winter, we ended up with 13 patches. We also repaired 2 frostboils. As you know we've had more than our share of rain this month, close to 7 ". When we get this much rain is a short period of time, especially when a number of showers produced over a 1" of rain at one time, it raises havoc with the storm sewer system. We dug up a catchbasin at the intersection of Dickens and Ridgewood. The water broke though a cement joint and washed out part of the road. So far we have 2 other sewer pipes that are leaking that we haven't had a chance to repair. We were out 8 times this month cleaning catch basins. We also had the vac -all out for 3 days cleaning sump basins We had some unexpected equipment repairs this month. Our 81 sweeper needed a new conveyor belt, 2 bearings and a top roller, S1, &00 worth. The starter went out of our 2 1/2 ton roller and can you image a starter for a 2 cylinder diesel costing $1,200.00, I couldn't, but the company that we purchased the machine from quoted us that price. With a little luck and a number of phone calls we finally located a rebuilt for $466.00. 0 . 5IGN WORK 1 - No Parking here to corner, including new posts, 3 - Stop, / 9 , 2 - No Parking and 1 - Slow Children, including new posts. We put up the Mound City Day, Banners the 25th. • CEMETERY WORK We laved out 3 graves and 7 stones, We also spent quite a bit of time helping people locate graves so they could decorate. • • 1yq9,- • • poi �\c� 1 l • TO: Ed Shukle FROM: Len Harrell SUBJECT: Monthly Report I. STATISTICS MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Telephone 472-0621 Dispatch 525.6210 Fax 4724656 EMERGENCY 911 for May, 1991 The police department responded to 686 calls for service during the month of May. There were 40 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 robbery, 8 - ° - burglaries, 30 larcenies, and 1 vehicle theft. There were 46 Part II offenses reported. Those offenses included 1 child abuse /neglect, 1 weapons violation, 1 narcotics violation, 6 damage to property, 1 liquor law violation, c DUI's, 2 simple assaults, 6 domestics (4 with assaults), 3 harassments, 6 juvenile status offenses, and 10 other offenses. The patrol division issued 76 adult citations and 2 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 12 tickets. warnings were issued to 44 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 4 adults and 1 juvenile arrested for felonies. There were 16 adults and 10 juveniles arrested for misdemeanors. There were an additional 8 warrant arrests. The department assisted in 6 vehicular accidents; one with injuries. There were 21 medical emergencies and 126 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 8 occasions in May. Property valued at $32,285 was stolen and $15,302 was recovered in May. • 1 1y93 FOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT 14ONTHLY REPORT - MAY, 1990 II. INVESTIGATION The investigators worked on 5 child protection cases and'i criminal sexual conduct case accounting for over 43 hours of investigative time. Thirty eight hours of investigative time was spent on an internal issue. Other cases included several thefts, DUI, stolen property, harassing communications, runaway youth, burglary, robbery, narcotics, assault, arson, fleeing a police officer, NSF checks, and auto theft. Steve Grand did an excellent job in conjunction with the ECFE Advisory Group in holding the "Family Safety Day" open house. Approximately 275 people attended the event. Formal complaints were issued for violation of an order for protection, gross misdemeanor DUI, driving after cancellation, driving after suspension, and speeding. C III. Personnel/Staffing 0 The department used approximately 74 hours of overtime during the month of May. Officers used 71 hours of comp -time, 8 days of vacation, 16.5 days of sick time, and 4 holidays. Officers earned 104 hours of comp - time. Amy Christenson com eted her field training program in May and has been asL.gned to the schedule. The department held both a vehicle auction and property auction in May. Combined, there was approximately $6,200 raised. The Mound Police Reserves were extremely helpful at our property auction. Officer Truax, who has been our D.A.R.E. officer, has requested to be replaced. Officer Truax has done an excellent job over the past two years, but prefers to return to full -time patrol responsibilities. Officer Todd Limond has volunteered for the position and will be training in June. 2 • 14f MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - MAY, 1990 IV. Trainina Officers received department during involved emergency management, office protection. Each defensive tactics handle baton. • 17 days of training outside the the month of May. Those courses medical technician, crash injury ar survival skills, and dignitary officer also attended "in- house" instruction with the PR -24 side 3 ►44s 1 TOTAL 40 1 KRY, 1991 3 0 1 PART 11 CLINES Child AbusWiiaalect 1 0 0 0 _ 0 OFFENSES CLEARED EXCEPT. CLEARED BY ARRESTED 0 REPORTED UNFOUNDED CLEARED ARREST ADULT ANEMILE MRT I CHIMES 0 0 0 Vespons 1 Nowticida 0 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Sexual Conduct 0 0 0 0 0 0 Robbery 1 1 0 0 0 0 Aggrmted Assault 0 C 0 0 0 0 Burglary a 0 0 0 0 0 Larceny 30 0 0 3 2 1 Vehicle Theft 1 0 1 0 2 0 Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 40 1 1 3 4 1 PART 11 CLINES Child AbusWiiaalect 1 0 0 0 _ 0 0 Forvery/MTF Checks 0 0 0 0 0 0 Criminal Damage to Property 6 0 0 0 0 0 Vespons 1 0 0 1 0 1 Narcotics 1 0 0 1 1 0 Liquor Laws 1 0 0 1 0 1 out 9 0 0 9 0 Sim Simple Assault 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 Domestic Assault 4 0 0 4 4 0 Domestic (No Assault) 2 0 0 0 0 0 Haresssient 3 0 0 0 0 0 Juvenite Status Offenses 6 0 2 4 0 8 W Ic Peace 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trespassing 1 0 0 0 0 0 All Other Offenses 9 0 1 2 2 0 TOTAL 46 0 4 22 16 10 PART III L PART IV Property Daaege Accidents 5 Personal Injury Accidents 1 Fatal Accidents 0 Nediuls 21 Mimi Ccsptaints 126 Mutual Aid 8 Other General investigations 437 598 TOTAL Hemepin County Child Protection 1 CHIPS 1 TOTAL 686 1 5 25 20 11 149 • MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT MAY, 1991 • • 1417 THIS YEAR TO LAST YEAR GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY MONTH DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 40 347 404 Non - Hazardous Citations 23 113 129 Hazardous Warnings 1 9 53 Non - Hazardous warnings 25 111 190 Verbal Warnings 54 556 612 Parking Citations 12 251 159 DWI 9 43 38 Over .10 6 26 30 Property Damage Accidents 4 36 26 Personal Injury Accidents 1 13 11 Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 Adult Felony Arrests 4 17 30 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 18 130 192 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 6 32 46 Juvenile Felony Arrests 1 10 32 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 1 30 25 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 9 16 11 Part I Offenses 40 122 122 Part II Offenses 46 245 335 Medicals 21 109 126 Animmal Complaints 126 367 363 Other Public Contacts 437 2,168 2,401 TOTAL 884 4,751 5,315 Assists 41 212 142 Follow -ups 14 46 107 Henn. County Child Protection 1 21 18 Mutual Aid Given 8 53 62 Mutual Aid Requested 0 16 36 1417 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MAY, 1991 CITATIONS ADULT �pY DWI 9 0 More than .10 %.BAC 6 0 Careless /Reckless Driving 0 0 Driving After Susp. or Rev. 2 0 Open Bottle 1 0 Speeding 24 1 No DL or Expired DL 1 0 Restriction on DL 1 0 Improper, Expired, or No Plates 17 0 Illegal Passing 0 0 Stop Sign Violations 3 0 Failure to Yield 0 0 Equipment Violations 0 0 H &R Leaving the Scene 0 0 No Insurance 0 0 Illegal or Unsafe Turn 0 0 Over the Centerline 1 0 Parking Violations 12 0 Crosswalk 1 0 Dog Ordinances 1 0 Derelict Autos 0 0 Seat Belt 5 1 MV /ATV 0 0 Miscellaneous Tags 4 0 TOTAL 88 2 1416 • • MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT KAY, 1991 LINOS No Insurance Traffic Equipment Crosswalk Animals Trash /Derelict Autos Seat Belt Trespassing Miscellaneous WARRANT ARRESTS Felony Warrant Misdemeanor Warrants . 6L ADU LT Ts 14 1 1 0 13 1 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 42 2 0 0 8 0 147? RUN: 31- w►Y -91 PR003 PROP PROP INCIDENT SEO TYPE TYPE DESC NUMBER NO NO AUTO/TK 05105/91 91000620 1 1 BIKE BICYCL 91000668 1 1 CtOTN 05/08/91 • 91000622 1 2 CtOTN S30 91000642 1 S CLOTN 05/08/91 91000691 1 1 CONSUIM SS88 91000611 1 1 CONSIN 05/08/91 91000624 1 2 CONSUM $1,120 91000628 1 6 CONSIN 05/09/91 91000661 1 1 GUMS 518 91000628 1 4 SM0/ATV 910" 91000016 1 1 JEWELRY $161 9100063/ 1 1 MUSICAL TRUMPE 91000714 1 1 PER ACC S12 91000673 1 2 PER ACC 05/05/91 "000692 1 1 RADIO S50 91000622 1 3 RADIO 91000628 1 1 RADIO 91000631 1 2 RADIO 91'".00693 1 1 RADIO RAOARD 91000650 1 1 RADIO STEREO 91009624 1 1 RADIO TELEVI 91000628 1 2 SPT EOP 91010627 1 2 SPT FOP 91000628 1 3 SPT EGP 91000630 1 1 SPY EOP 91000642 1 2 SPT EOP 91000642 1 3 SP1 EOP DEPTNF 9100,.627 1 1 CURNCY 91000576 1 1 CURNCT 91000584 1 1 CURNCY 91000624 1 3 CURNCY 91000631 1 3 CURNCY 91000642 1 1 CURNCT 91000670 1 1 CURNCT 91000673 1 1 CURNCY 91000686 1 1 CURNCY 91000689 1 1 CURNCY 91000691 1 2 CURNCY 91000692 1 2 CURNCY 91000704 1 1 CURNCT 91000710 1 1 VIEWING 91000624 1 4 VIEWING 91000629 1 1 VIEWING 91000629 1 2 INSTALLATION NAME •- NOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT R • R • • f ENF0RS PROPERTY - STOLEN/RECOVERED 04/26/91 TNRU 05 /23/91 DATE STOLEN DATE RECOVERED STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED VALUE 05/05/91 $14,000 05/14/91 5120 05/05/91 5180 05/09/91 5200 05/18/91 5140 05/04/91 $12 05105/91 5!. 05/06/91 S12 05/14/91 $12 05/08/91 $250 01/07/91 $1,000 05/08/91 • S5,000 05/22/91 $403 05/15/91 S30 05/18/91 $50 05/05/91 5300 05/08/91 5655 05/00/91 u0 05/18/91 SS88 05,10/91 S190 05/05/91 5700 05/08/91 $75 05/08/91 5100 05/08/91 $1,120 05/08/91 $450 05/09/91 S150 05/09/91 $50 05/08/91 5515 04/26/91 518 04/29/91 5520 05/05/91 $15 05/08/91 510 05/09/91 S5 05/14/91 $161 05/15/91 $15 05/18/91 S3 05/18/91 S2 05/18/91 $60 05/18/91 S12 05/20/91 S1 05/21/91 5290 05/05/91 5260 05/08/91 $75 05/08/91 S50 05/06/91 514,000 05/04/91 $12 05/09/91 $1,000 05/21/91 $290 PAGE i • r �J 1500 NN: 31-NAT-91 INSTALLATION NAME -• MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT Pm • • • • • • ENFtlRS is PROPERTY - STOLEN /RECOVERED 04/26/91 TNRU 05 /23/91 PROP PROP INCIDENT SEO TYPE DATE STOLEN DATE TYPE OESC NUMBER NO NO STOLEN VALUE RECOVERED EOP TLS 9100051'5 1 1 04/26/91 5465 EOP TLS 91000601 1 1 05/01/91 $50 EOP TLS 91000602 1 1 05/01/91 $500 EOP TLS 91000602 1 2 05/01/91 548 EOP TLS 91000606 1 1 05/03/91 5840 EOP TLS 91000616 1 1 05/03/91 5240 EOP TLS 91000622 1 1 05/05/91 $8 EOP TLS 91000631 1 4 05/08/91 5779 EOP TLS 91000642 1 4 05/09/91 $189 EOP TLS 91000672 1 1 05/15/91 $400 ALL OTR 91000601 1 2 05/01/91 5105 ALL OTR 91000628 1 5 05/08/91 $100 All OTR 91000675 1 1 05/15/91 550 All OTR 91000677 1 1 05/16/91 $28 ALL OTR 91000684 1 1 05/18/91 $550 ALL OTR 91000686 1 2 05/18/91 S75 ALL OTR 91000704 1 2 05/20/91 S15 TOTALS: $32,285 0 • RECOVERED VALUE $15,302 PAGE 2 1So 1 RUN: 29- MAY -91 CFS03 PRINARY 1SN'S ONLY? NO ACTIVITY CODES: All ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09000 SPEEDING 09001 J-SPEEDING 09002 NO D /L, EXPIRED D/L 09004 RESTRICTED 0/l 09006 TEST REFUSAL 09010 BAC OVER .10 0%)12 OPEN BOTTLE 09014 STOP SIGN 09026 OVER THE CENTER LINE 09030 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 09038 ALL OTHER TRAFFIC 09040 NO SEATBELT 09041 J•NO SEATSELT 09100 PARKING /ALL OTHER 09150 NO TRAILER PARKING 09200 OAS /DAR /DAC 09210 PLATES /NO- IMPROPER- EXPIRED 09312 FOUND ANIMALS /IMPOUNDS 09313 FOUND PROPERTY 09314 FOUND VEHICLES/ IMPOUNDED 09430 PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENTS 09450 PROPERTY DAMAGE ACCIDENTS 09451 H/R PROPERTY DAMAGE ACC. INSTALLATION NAME -- VAM POLICE DEPARTMENT PACE 1 t• t t t 4 ENFORS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 04/26/91 THRU 05 /23/91 - - - - - - - --- - PATROL AREAS ....._..... 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 s0 90 TOTAL 7 3 6 5 3 1 3 1 i 1 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 2 5 3 2 5 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 I 1 24 1 1 1 2 6 1 3 1 1 2 5 1 11 1 2 17 5 8 1 i 5 1 C. 0 1,502. RUN: 29- MAY-91 CFS03 PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO 0 TIVITY CODES: ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- NOW POLICE DEPARTMENT f f • f • • ENF0RS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 04/26/91 THRU 05/23/91 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 09500 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ACC /OTHER 09561 DOG BITE 09563 DOG AT LARGE 09556 ANIMAL ENFORCEMENT TICKETS 09710 ATTEMPTED SUICIDE 09730 MEDICALS 09731 DETO%-MEDICALS 09800 ALL OTHER/UNCLASSIFIED 09801 DOMESTIC /NO ASSAULT 09900 ALL NCCP CASES * OPEN DOOR /ALARMS 09913 CHIPS 09930 HANDGUN APPLICATION 09945 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 09950 INTELLIGENCE 09980 WARRANTS 09992 MUTUAL AID /8100 09994 MUTUAL AID/ ALL OTHER A5351 ASLT S- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS- ADLT -FAM A5352 ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM-HANDS- ADLT-ACO A5356 ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM•HANDS-CHLD-STR 33764 BURG 3 -UNOCC MRES FRC -N-UNK WEAP -COM THEFT 63864 BURG 3 -UNOCC MRES NO FRC-N•UNK WEAP-COM THEFT 1 � J PAGE 2 - - - - - - - - - . - PATROL AREAS - - • - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 i 1 1 1 2 4 1 6 3 3 17 1 1 . 2 . 1 2 1 2 6 1 1 2 ✓ 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 8 7 7 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 I Sa3 RUN: 29- NAY -91 CFS03 PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO ACTIVITY CODES: All INSTALLATION NAME •- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT r • s • s • ENF0RS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 04/26/91 THRU 05 /23/91 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ;3$94 BURG 3 -UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U-UMK WEAP -CON THEFT 8476P BURG 4 -UNOCC NRES FRC -M -UNK WEAP -UNK ACT 84990 BURG 4 -AT FRC RES-U -UNK WEAP -UNK ACT D3550 ORUGS -SCN 2 NARCOTIC-POSSES3-COCAIN -OTN CHAR E4700 ESC -GN -FLEE AN OFFICER 13060 CRIM AGNST FAM- MS- NEGLECT OF A CHILD J2500 TRAFFIC•GN-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J2700 TRAF- ACCID- GM- AGGRAVATED VIOLATION J3500 TRAF- ACCID- MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR M3001 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER M3005 JUVENILE-USE OF TOBACCO M5313 JUVEMILE-CURFEW M5350 RUNAWAY M7701 FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER 03190 DISTURB PEACE -MS-NARRASSING COMMRIMICATIONS P2110 PROP DAMAGE-GM- PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3110 PROP DAMAGE- MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3310 TRESPASS-MS- PRIVATE -UNK INTENT P3600 LITTER- UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS R3136 ROBB- SIMPLE- HIGHWAY -KNIFE CUT - CHILD -STR T2021 THEFT - $251 - $2500- FE-FRM BUILDING -MONEY T2029 THEFT- S251•S2500- FE-FRM BUILDING -OTM PROP T2059 THEFT -$251. S2500- FE•FRM YARDS-OTH PROP PAGE 3 -- - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS --- - - -• -- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 EO 90 TOTAL t t 1 t 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 t 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 t 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 0 1 50 RUN: 29-RAY-91 CFS03 PRIMARY ISN's ONLY? NO 0 TIVITY CODES: All INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT ENF0RS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATRON AREA 04/26/91 THRU 05i23/91 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION T2061 THEFT- S25142500-FE -FRM MAIL-MONEY T2151 T4EFT -5251 - $2500 -FE -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY 2159 THEFT- 1161425004E-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP T2169 THEFT - 5251 - 52500- FE-FRM WATERCRAFT -0TH PROP T4020 THEFT -5250 LESS-MS-FRM BUILDING-UNK PROP T4021 THEFT -5250 LESS- MS-FRM BUILDING -MONEY T4029 TNEFT•S250 LESS -NS -FRM BUILDING -OTM PROP 14059 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS -0TH PROP T4061 THEFT -5250 LESS-MS-FRM MAIL-MONEY T4069 THEFT-S250 LESS -MS -FRM MAIN -OTH PROP * THEFT -$250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-MONEY T4159 THEFT -$250 LESS-MS -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -0TH PROP U3288 THEFT-MIS-SHOPLIFTING • $200 OR LESS U3499 THEFT•14S- BICYCLE -NO MOTOR-S200 OR LESS V1021 VEN THEFT- FE-OVER S2500-AUTO W3180 of APONS - MS - DISCHARGE- FIREWORKS-NO CHAR REPORT TOTALS: • PAGE 4 -- - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS• ---- - - - - -- 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 i 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 50 30 56 47 50 1 1 7 242 1 Sas RUM: 29- MAY-91 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 OFFO1 • • r • • t PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DISPOSITION CODES: ALL ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 04/26/91 THRU 05/23/91 /---------- ------ OFFENSES CLEARED ------------ - - - - -/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL - - - -BY ARREST - - -- BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION ------------------- CLEARED ------------ CLEARED A5351 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 100.0 ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS-ADLT -FAM A5352 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM- HANDS-ADLT -ACC .0 A5356 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS HRM - HANDS- CHLD -STR 83764 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 BURG 3 -UNOCC NRES FRC -N-UNK WEAP -COM THEFT .0 83864 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 BURG 3 -UNOCC NRES NO FRC-N-UNK WEAP -COM THEFT .0 83894 1 0 1 1 0 0 O 0 BURG 3 -UNOCC NRES NO FRC-U -UNK WEAP -COM THEFT .0 84760 1 BURG 4-UN000 NRES FRC -N -UNK WEAP -UNK ACT 0 1 f 0 0 i 0 0 84990 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 BURG 4 -AT FRC RES -U -UNK WEAP -UNK ACT / D3550 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 DRUGS-SCH 2 NARCOTIC- POSSESS-COCAIN-OTH CHAR �� E4700 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 ESC-GM -FLEE AN OFFICER 13060 1 0 1 1 0 / 0 0 0 .0 CRIM AGNST FAN- MS-NELLECT OF A CHILD J2500 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 TRAFFIC-GM -DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIOL'OR J2700 3 u 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 TRAF ACCID- GM- AGGRAVAIED VIOLATION J3500 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 100.0 TRAF MS•DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR M3001 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 JUVENILE-ALCOHOL OFFENDER • ISoG RUN: 29- NAT -91 INSTALLATION NAME •- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OFFOI P w1RY ISN'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S ITION CODES: ALL IVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 04/26/91 THRU 05/23/91 /------ ------ - - -- OFFENSES CLEARED ----- •------ - - - - -/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL ----BY ARREST - - -- BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED ..............................................................•------------------------•-----. UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION ...---..........----........... CLEARED CLEARED M3005 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 JUVENILE -USE OF TOBACCO M5313 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 100.0 JUVENILE - CURFEW M5350 3 0 3 0 0 1 2 3 100.0 RUNAWAY M7701 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 FALSELY IMPERSONATING ANOTHER N3190 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 DISTURB PEACE- MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS .0 P2110 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 PROP DAMAGE -GM- PRIVATE-UNK INTENT .0 S O AMAr,E-MS-PRIVATE-UNK 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 .0 INTENT P3310 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 TRESPASS -MS- PRIVATE -UNK INTENT P3600 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 LITTER - UNLAWFUL DEPOSIT OF GARBAGE-MS R3136 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 ROSS - SIMPLE- IIIGHWAY-KNIFE CUT-CHILD -STR T2021 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT425142500 -FE -FRM BUILDING-MONEV T2029 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT -5251 - $2500- FE-FRM BUILDING -0TH PROP T2059 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT - 11251 - 52500 -FE -FRM YARDS -0TH PROP T2061 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT - $251- %2500-FE-FRM MAIL -MONEY 72151 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 T4EFT-$251-$2500 -FE -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -MONEY 1 r u )5707 RUN: 29- MAY -91 INSTALLATION NAME - MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 OFF0) * * * * * * PRIMARY ISM'S ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S DISPOSITION CODES: ALL ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 04/26/91 THOU 05 /23/91 /------------- - -- OFFENSES CLEARED -- ---------- - - - - -/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL - - - -BY ARREST - - -- BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED .... .............................................---...----------------------.......------. OFFENSES PENDIN'j ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION ............................... CLEARED CLEARED T2159 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT - 125142500- FE-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP T2169 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT S251-52S00-FE -FRM WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP T4020 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 THEFT -5250 LESS- MS -FRN BUILDING-UNK PROP T4021 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT -5250 LESS- MS -FRN BUILDING -MONEY T4029 1 D 1 1 0 0 0 0 THEFT-S250 LESS-NS -FRN BUILDING-OTH PROP .0 T4059 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 THEFT-S250 LESS- MS -FRN YARDS -OTH PROP .0 T4061 1 THEFT -1250 LESS- NS-FRM MAIL-MONEY 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 T4151 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT -5250 LESS- MS -FRM MOTOR VEH!CLE-MONEY T4159 4 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT-S250 LESS-MS-FRM MOTOR VEHICLE -0TH PROP U328L 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 100.0 THEFT - $200 OR LESS U3498 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT- MS-BICYCLE-NO MOTOR -5200 OR LESS V1021 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 VEH THEFT -FE -OVER S2500-AUTO W3180 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 WEAPONS MS OISCHARGE- FIREWORKS -NO CHAR 4. 150t RUN: 29- MAY -91 INSTALLATION NAME -- MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 4 OFF01 P ART ISM'$ ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S ITION CODES: ALL CTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 04/26/91 TMRU 05 /23/91 /- ---------- - -- -- OFFENSES CLEARED - ----------- - - - - -/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL -- - -BY ARREST - - -- BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED ---------------- ---------------------------- --- ------......................... REPORT TOTALS - 77 1 76 46 18 7 30 39.4 r e r� 1500? m June 6, 1991 CITY of MOUND TO; Ed Shukle City Manager FROM; Greg Bergquist Mechanic • 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MQuND, MINNESOTA 55364 1612) 472 -1155 SUBJECT; May's Activity Report POLICE DEPT. 840 - 90 Pontiac - Front brakes and oil change 841 - 89 Pontiac - Front brakes and oil change 843 - 90 Pontiac - Front brakes, oil change and front tires. 845 - 88 Chev. - Front brakes and oil change Metro Task Force - 89 Pontiac - Charge A/C 60 - S -10 Pickup - Installed new topper and light bar. gi-MET DEPT #31 - 84 Ford Staff car - Front shocks #13 - 78 Chev. Dump - 2 mufflers #8 - 85 Ford Dump - adjust brakes and batteries #5 - 83 Ford Dump - install air tailgate valve #23 - 89 Elgin Sweeper - service and main broom #24 - 80 Elgin Sweeper - service and main broom #28 - Raygo Blacktop Roller - starter Air compressor - service SEWER b WATER #9 - 85 Chev. - service . #33 - 87 Pontiac Staff car - alternator Concrete cutting saw - service PARK - S 1510 #2 - 82 Chev. Pickup servi - -- #14 - 90 Chev. 1-ton- flat tires -MT-y- Mkh S ADMINIuTRATION #19 - 90 Dodge - battery and service Installer: sound devices in the Police garage doors. • ISO. I C ITY of ti1(�[�.T \ (J MOUNO. MINNESO R0 5D64 ;612! 4%2.11;$ June 5, 1991 TO; Ed Shakle City Manager FROM; Joyce„ Nelson - - .- Recycling Coordinator SUBJECT; May's Recycling Knutson didn't have the figures ready for me in May for April's tonnage. 64.35 tons of recycling was picked up in 16 April, our check from Knutson was $889.07 and the participation rate was 64% last year April's tonnage was 53.76 with a participation rate of 49 %. May 1st was the Hennepin County's 5th Annual Recycling Recognition Luncheon:. As you all know Mound received a Cooperative Effort Award. There are 44 cities in Hennepin County's Recycling Program, we placed 9th I'a participation rate (60 %). All the cities in Hennepin County received the 1990 Partnership Award, this award was given to us because Hennepin County was recognized by the National Recycling Coalition as having the Best Regional Program in 1990. May's tonnage was 50 tons. 0 1 51.2 • June 6, 1991 TO; Ed Shukle City Manager CITY of 1'1(��' \TD %'s�N.MMI ESO MI N NESOTA FROM; Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. SUBJECT; May's Activity Report WATER DEPT. i In May we pumped 24,455,000 gallons of water, "urn -offs for April non - payments were completed on clay 6, 1991. Turn -offs for May were completed on May 30, 1991. The Chateau water tower is back in service as of June 4, 1991. I met with the Neptune Water Meter Co. salespeople to discuss the new water meters they have. These meters are similar to the Sensus Meter that we have been testing since December 1990. Each system is an automatic read system that interrogate the meter head inside the house. So far with the meter that we have out in the field the tests have been Positive. We will be receiving 60 of Neptunes new pro -read meters soon. We will install these and then we will be able to compare the two systems equally. SEWER DEPT. The Sewer Dept. repaired 6 pieces of bad sewer line on Tuxedo Blvd. this month. We met with the contractor for our sewer lift up grade. All of the by -pass pumping pipe and underground electrical (except for F -1 lift at Lakewinds) has been completed. "he sewer line pro '4ect at 5227 Bartlett Blvd. for Mr. Killion has been completed. This line had to be relocated 10' west of the existing main to allow Mr. Killion to add an addition to his house. This expense was Mr. Killions responsibility. 1,913 • We repaired a sewer line on Ridgwood Rd. the gas company ran their gas service t.hru the main. The bill will be sent to them. • 1,511 11 53.1 h'AYW00C RC'A0 CIT Y , l' c� IN ICDUND s ".',NJ M1,NvE %0T.A -5 -,364 June 6, 1991 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK RE: MAY MONTHLY REPORT There were 2 regular Council Meetings, and 2 Board of Review Meetings in May. I want to take this opportunity to thank Linda for handling the the meetings in May. From these meetings there were minutes, resolutions and ordinances to be completed. I attended an election meeting with other City Clerks to review the legislation passed in the past session. I attended the annual IIMC (International Institute of Municipal Clerks) Conference from May 20 to 25. The theme this year was "Bridge to Excellence ". There were a variety of topics covered in the educational sessions, presentations and the exhibits. I feel this conference helps me to acquire knowledge that can be used in Mound to better serve the residents and my profession. There were over 40 different workshops on a variety of topics. IIMC now has over 10,000 members from all over the world. I just started my second year of a three year term on the IIMC Board of Directors representing Region VI (Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin). There are it regions in this organization with 2 directors from each region. I have also been appointed to the IIMC Records Retention Committee. I have finished the research and offered my recommendations on 6 parcels of tax forfeit land. I presented them to the Planning Commission on June 3rd. They approved my recommendations. Now I will be presenting them to the Park & Open Space Commission in July. Joyce & I have worked on an ordinance that requires owners of multiple - family dwellings to provide separation and collection of recyclable materials. This has now been submitted to the City Attorney for review and recommendations, It will come before the City Council the last meeting in June. /5'JS MOUND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENI FOR MONTH OF MA 1991 FIRE FIGHTERS DRILLS 3 MAINTENANCE FIRE 6 RESCUE M R/ DKM mm w m m u MAII�Q'. W I W iNfIS 17 S / WIIfT�S H1RS F[1RS RAtF GREG JERRY DAVID 1S /b DAVID CARLSCK JAMES CASEY FISc GAR MARVIN BRE'T N BUD OP x X 1 2 19 00 2 X X 2 19.00 1 X X 2 19.00 0 X X 2 19.00 2 E X 1 9.50 2 X X 2 19.00 2 X X 2 19.00 3 X X 2 19.00 2 X X 2 19.00 0 X E 1 9.50 0 X X 2 19.00 2 X X 2 19.00 2 X X 2 19.00 2 X _lE 1 9.50 2 E X 1 9.50 2 X X 2 19.00 3 X X 2 19.00 2 X X 2 19.00 1 x x 2 19.00 2 x x 2 19.00 7 X X 2 19.00 0 X E 1 9.50 0 E E 0 0 2 X E 1 9.50 1 x X 2 19.00 9 22 17 21 37 34 13 23 21 33 9 21 24 24 6 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 126.00 79.00 138.00 126.00 198.00 54.00 126.00 144.00 144 00 • TIM WILIJAMS x E 1 9.50 0 116 ' 6.00 Fin TOUVS 32 29 61 57 63 845 wm s r;0 80 72.2 15 IRIIIS- �14_4C� M4L'+II' 116 _ i rtc GREG PEDER TONY RAS USSEN MIKE SAVAGE _ KEVIN SIPPRELL RON STALLBAN _ TOM SWEKSON WILLIAM S r 'I':;L N M % :HLY ACTIVITY EFFORT • • • MDNIH OF MAY 1991 THIS MONIH MONTH S YEAR TO DATE LAST YEAR TO DATE NO. OF CALLS 37 42 173 184 MOUND FIRE -- cl^,ry 9 5 28 29 12 14 61 83 MINNETONKA BEACH FIRE EMERGF2ILY MINNETRISTA FIRE EMERGENC 2 1 5 5 0 0 3 1 2 4 14 11 2 8 18 8 ORONO FIRE EMFRGEVCY 3 5 13 16 0 2 7 6 SHOREWOOD FIRE EMFRGLIlCY 1 0 1 p 0 0 1 p SPRING PARK FIRE aMr GE17LY MUTUAL AID FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL FIRE CALLS 17 76 74 TOTAL EMERGENCY . 5 97 COMMERCIAL p RESIDENTIAL 8 5 29 31 IN USMAL 1 0 2 GRASS 6 MISCELLAN 6 7 22 y 6 AUTO 1 O 7 FALSE ALARM 3 5 16 NO. OF HOURS FIRE - MOUND MGE!lX_'Y 328 91 818 774 190 290 1184 1601 518 381 2002 2375 FIRE - MTKA BEACH r iml, 49 25 117 129 0 0 47 14 49 ^5 164 143 FIRE - M'TRISTA EI4RGE]*n TOTAL 71 93 444 263 34 176 377 207 105 269 821 470 FIRE - ORONO mGE!lc - Y TOTAL. 60 91 268 543 0 19 146 13 60 110 414 674 FIRE. - SHOREWOOD F. TOT.AI. 8 0 8 p 0 0 15 p 9 0 23 p FIRE - Jt'. FAKK t6tY t -�! Y TOTAL _.4 S4 46 10_ 87 73 42 FIRF. - MU` JAL AID E?IFRGE — TOTAL 18 0 18 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 64 TO TAL DRILL HOURS 152" 16 795 855 TOTAL FIR HOURS 575 354 18'23 2119 TOTAL EMERGENCY HOURS _ 27G 5p4 20 _ 221 TOTAL FIRE 6 F 74,V(;K -(N H.X 85 43 MUTUAL AID RECE MUTUAL AI GIV EN . 1 r. _ 1 l lSl1 r DATE MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT TOTAL MAINTENANCE FOR MONTH OF MEN ON DUTY J. ANDERSEN ..Z G. ANDERSON _ J. BABB Z D. BOYD D. BRYCE S. BRYCE D. CARLSON ..2 J. CASEY .2 S. COLLINS M. DAVID R. ENGELHART S. ERICKSON P. FISK J. GARVAIS D. GRADY K. GRADY C. HENDERSON 3 P. HENRY C7� B. LANDSMAN R. MAC 1CHKE J. NAFUS J. NELSON M. NELSON .Z B. NICCUM a.2 A. OPITZ -Z G. PALM 3 M. PALM vZ T. PALM G. PEDERSON T. RASMUSSEN 7 M. SAVAGE K. SIPPRELL R. STALLMAN v2 T. SWENSON W. SWENSON Y,�� R. WILLIAMS T. WILLIAMS 0 • • TOTAL MONTHLY HOURS I�"Ig -- D R I L L R E P O R T MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Date InAy /8 X911 cipline and Teamwork Critique of fires Pre -plan and Inspections Tools and Apparatus Identify Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films i First aid and Rescue Operation Use of Self - Contained Masks i Pumper Operation x Fire Streams & Friction Loss k House Burnings Natural /Propane Gas dert:cz. Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzles & Hose Appliance Hours Training Paid : ® Excused X Unexecused O Present / Not Paid scellaneous _ P uM ia.G .EtlO� na,� s $46,J S+w►oKE Deii� VEAvrn c,+770 .-1 _ A,e Z: o P E R S O N N E L ay.l.Andersen .J.Garvais 4A�� G. Palm AVG.Anderson A D.Grady M.Palm i J.Babb �� K.Grady PaIm t D.Boyd Yj C-Henderson ��' G.Pederson D. Bryce 9 2 %P.Henry �7 S.Bryce' B.Landsman �YM.Savage o z D.Carlson ? /t� R.Marschkr.. %K.Sipprell • J.Casey J.Nafus �C _P.Sta11man S.Collins j. Ne 1 son X_T.Suenson �R.Englehart I/x M.Ne1son _X W.SMenson a %S. Erickson Q ?7B.Niccum ��R.Willi.ams LP.Fisk A.Opitz /�" T.Williams D R I L L MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT Discipline and Teamwork Critique of fires Pre -plan and Inspections Tools and Apparatus Identify Hand Extinguisher Operation Wearing Protective Clothing Films i First aid and Rescue Operation i Use of Self - Contained Masks 2 �i R E P O R T Date Pumper Operation Z Fire Streams & Friction Loss House Burnings Natural /Propane Gas demos. Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nozzles & Hose Appliance Hours Training Paid : (9 Excused X Unexecused 0 Present / Not Paid Miscellaneous Euol.u•f1 S - 6n _ i ---v o ScBA '5v.oK-4-_ 6 2 OLLy n LA 0,QC IOU CAC- 2Y i - 12S? ma� s � •— G, ac u L -- — P E R S O N N E L �~~ Z J.Andersen ZjG.Anderson � J,Babb D. Boyd �4_D.Bryce 2 / S. Bryce 2 A D.Carl son t '/ J.Casey S.Collins 2 TR.Eng1ehart 2� S.Erickson 1&_P.Fisk IS AO 1 .may J.Garvais 'A D.Grady --X_K . Grady _V& C. Henderson Z P. Hen ry _B-Landsman R.Marschke Z% J.Nafus Z�i.Nelson I� M.Nelson 27 8.Niccum .__�- A.Opitz _X G.Palm STZM.Palm e 2 G . Pede r son Z�c T.Rassmusen ,Z7)J�M.Savage Z K.S1ppre11 2A, P..Stallman T.Swenson 2lZ w . Swenson Z %y R.Williams 2��T.Williams 11 C rl ' I ` � , l�f �`lC /`_Tl \TI1 _ ' ,AVN EDRQA�l6a MAY 1991 MONTHLY REPORT PARKS DEPARTMENT Parks As you are aware, May was a very wet month. We could not keep up with the mowing, even with sending the mowing crew out during the lighter rains. If the weather cooperates, we should catch up the first part of June. I had a few complaints of the dandelions that grow unsprayed in the parks, but e x p l a i n e d the cost to de the areas were proh 1 b i - tive. The pianter at Mound Bay Park was installed for the Jaycees. They will be doing a planting there the first part of June. Chester Park was finished with the laying of sod and we have in- stalled as temporary fence to keep the foot traffic until the sod has taken. The parks crew has been involved in preparing the planters in the parks for Adopt a Green Space. They have added dirt and mulch to each one. Also, they removed the wood chips from the downtown planters and filled them with dirt and mulch for the plantings that will be done. The small bounce toys were installed at Tyrone and Philbrook along with a covered picnic table at Philbrook. Beaches Mound Bay Park Beach opened for Memorial weekend, so we clean it daily during the work week. The other smaller beaches will open mid -June and will also be cleaned during the work week. Tree Removal / Weeds With spring, the Twenty -two trees notices were sent. will begin soon, time to take. sidewalks and the activity in these two areas were scheduled to be removed The sidewalk and retaining w we need a little dry weather This will be done using the street crew for the walls. have increased. and twelve weed all weed spraying so it will have parks crew for 0 C ommons / D ocks Things have been busy with the warmer weather. June lst is when :311 docks must be in the water. There are a lot of notices going out for sites to clean up their areas, install docks, and do repairs. lsAl May 1991 Parks Department Report . Page 2 Cemetery With Memorial Day we had some problems because the grass grew so fast and the rains llmited the mowing. Coupled with the weather, the number of plants and planters seemed to double this year. The policy Is that we allow the plants a few days before the Holiday and request their removal seven days after the Holiday. Phil Haugen had the ground looking great on Thursday, but by Sun- day the grass needed mowing again. JFspj is • jsA01-.4. • 0 • CITY of N IOU ND TO: MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL FROM: JOEL KRUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER RE: MAY MONTHLY REPORT DATE: JUNE 39 1991 MA WOODFUAn V LANES' 5`,3ti4 With all the rain in May, you would think people's spirits would be dampened and business would be down. Quite the contrary, in terms of dollars, we had our best month ever. We did $121,552 in sales. This compares to $85,078 that we did in May of 1990. Our customer count of 10,085 was incredible also. Last year in May it was 8151. For the year we are up $96,906 over last, year at this time. I attended the NLSA (National Liquor Sture Association) convention in Las Vegas from May 12th - 16th. This was the first event of this kind that I have participated in since I've been manager here. The theme of the meeting was "Focusing on the Profitable FutLre ". I found the speakers, discussions and panels very informative and refreshing. It was also extremely beneficial to talk with other retailers from different parts of the country to get their perspective on critical issues. The most important informatior, I got out of the convention was how to be more aggressive and competitive in this troubled business of ours through the rest of the 90 JK:ls lSo?3 v ��M1N N(T� 2 � RL ^"t T 10 �A WA RC MEMSFAS w.0.I Coc Cr.w Grrv;""w ALen O Faver Y.ce Char oemh— ".rr• k..rarl :d Cr0.rrV M.nnrt.�•.a He 1cn .c rn "Z-4n IrrnSl.h.. M.nnM: Ln ::!..q'ra F fiaocc7c. Spy Nam - Aar..n flanm icnx JW .",.s N 3r,11hu01 f lceirq• .ot swr L Murr O•ono .u+n G Ma�rnra vcfwr ­ arrUS Manrnson I%ayealr ROWA K Finsbury wnne oAkA RaWA Raw &Wewrow rlwrr" w Rees Mound Fboen L s+oc m woom" LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT QX!ASI '.vnr ?n'A qn'';! vA;A) Si; Ir •r.. AAA. - AtA M'NNI<,71A -"3QI tr i.Fr 617'4 EUGENE R.STROMMEN FxFCUrIV () , 4FCICl%+ RECD j A 51991 TO: MOUND CITY COUNCIL DATE: JUNE 3, 1991 FROM: TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATIVE SUBJECT: MAY REPORT - LMCD 1 1.1 Eurasion Watermilfoil Task Force, The supervision and crew have been hired and the equipment placed _in a state of readiness. When the training is Completed, we will be ready to commence the 1991 harvest season. We have moved the start date from 6/10 to 6/17 to save some cost land because of the late appearance of the weed on the surface. The legislature passed the $2 surtax on boat licenses to fund exotic species control. This amounts to some $440M each year of the bienium. It is better than nothing, but does not really address the need, when spread to all species and all lakes. The DNR will administer. We have good relations there and are optimistic about retaining or somewhat expanding our present funding from the State. We are approaching the pull -tab organizations in a last chance attempt to fully fund 1991 without resort to the rainy day fund. We talked to the Dutch Lake lakeshore owners' group during the month. They are doing nearly all the things that we recommend that such groups do in order to give them the best chance of keeping total infestation out of their lake. I understand now that they have received assurance from Oic DNR of matching funds for chemical treatment, as well as the city contribution. 1.2 Management Plan The LMCD has reconvened the interagency advisory committee that originally workcI on the Plan in an attempt to pass upon some of the changes proposed by the cities. While 1 was out of town on business and could not attend the May 29th meeting of the cities, from the reports I get, the meeting once again highlighted the disarray of the dissenting cities. This continued low quality of discussions does nothing to enhance the public's impression of local governmental bodies. 0 • is� y • 1.3 Other General ,Interest Items. A 1992 budget draft has been submitted and submitted to the cities this week. It calls for a 5% increase in the administrative budget and a 27% increase in the Milfoil budget (From SOM to $80M). This assumes that S50M will be forthcoming from the DNR and S120M from the County. We arc snlisting the cities' help in making these two things happen. 2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS . MOUND 2.1 None om fSe Mound Representative • Lace Minnetonka Conservation District cc. Gene Strommen, Executive Director, LMCD , rR:mac LJ 2 /5-As SUN 31991 LAIR MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT May 31, 1991 TO: LMCD Member Municipality Mayors City Council Members INFO TO: LMCD Board Members FROM: LMCD Chair Dave Cochran SUBJECT: Preliminary Discussion Draft, 1992 Administative and Eurasian Water Milfoil Budget We are pleased to provide the preliminary discussion draft of the 1992 budget for LMCD's administrative and Eurasian water milfoil program. An initial budget draft was introduced at the May 22, 1991 - LMCD' board meet The -board ,recognizes thi. -1 Merest. its _- _. member aitiss his vo'iA being provided time BEFORE the budget is dopted and presented to the cities. This procedure is being instituted this year to advance the comment opportunity. The LMCD enabling act has provided for a specific budget review procedure, as described in the enclosed excerpt. This has been the procedure followed in past years. You will find the administrative levy amount, at $109,422, or about 5% over the 1991 budget. This amount is arrived at by taking the total combined disbursements and subtracting from it all other revenue items. You will note there are a number of user fee revenue items already supporting the over- all operation. The significant change in the 1992 budget proposal is the Board's recommendation that the Eurasian water milfoil weed control program should be fully funded by government resources. The proposal therefore shows an increase in the cities' share, with the $170,000 to come from other public agencies reflecting a requirement for increased funds from the MN DNR, projecting an increase from $30,000 to $50,000, and the necessity for Hennepin County to back the program by some $120,000. Securing these two agencies' support will take the vigorous backing of our 14 Lake Minnetonka citie:a. This budget HAS NOT been adopted by the LMCD Board. It will be fully evaluated for adoption at its June 26 meeting. Your city's constructive input is invited before or at that time. 1,52. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1992 Administrative Budget P R E L I M I N A R Y D I S C U S S I O N D R A F T 1 (Introducing 100% of Eurasian water milfoil annual revenue needs as a governmental responsibility, see attached explanation.) 2 (Carry-over from 1991 Shoreland Grant Agreement to be spent in 1992) DISBURSEMENTS Personnel Services Administration Salaries 84,060 84,965 100,500 1O5,',00 -+ 5 \ Employer Benefit Contr. 13 8i 13,934 14,800 17,',00 3 + 15 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 97,870 98,899 115,300 122,800 + 6 3 (Proportionate increase, plus one expense underestimated for '91) Contractual Services Office Lease 1990 1990 1991 .1992 1,080 REVENUE Budget Actual Budget Proposed %a LMCD Communities Admn Levy 89,490 89,490 103,825 109,422 + 5 EW Milfoil Program: 1,900 3,100 2,280 1 + 7) City Contributions 60,000 60,000 63,000 80,000 + 27 Other Public Agencies 115,000 83,550 102,000 170,000 +67 Private Solicitation 50,000 49,912 85,000 -0- -100 Court Pines 40,000 40,706 35,000 38.000 + 9 Licenses & Permits 80,000 76,338 65,000 85,000 +31 Interest 10,000 13.257 8,000 8,000 -0- Shoreland Rules, DNR Agreement -0- -0 45,000 20,000 2 - 55 Shoreland Rules, DNR Admn /Cons. -0- -0- 15,000 10,000 2 -33 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 444,490 413,253 521,825 520,422 -0- 1 (Introducing 100% of Eurasian water milfoil annual revenue needs as a governmental responsibility, see attached explanation.) 2 (Carry-over from 1991 Shoreland Grant Agreement to be spent in 1992) DISBURSEMENTS Personnel Services Administration Salaries 84,060 84,965 100,500 1O5,',00 -+ 5 \ Employer Benefit Contr. 13 8i 13,934 14,800 17,',00 3 + 15 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 97,870 98,899 115,300 122,800 + 6 3 (Proportionate increase, plus one expense underestimated for '91) Contractual Services Office Lease 4,140 4,130 9,600 10,130 4 1 5 Utilities, Janitorial 1,080 1,386 1,500 -0- 5 -100 Recorder, Temp Secy, Acctg 9,830 7,448 6,575 5.550 6 -1.5 TOTAL CONTRACT SERVICES 15,050 12,964 17,675 15,680 - 11 4 (Lease subject to 4.5% annual increase) 5 (Items now included in new office lease) 6 (Eliminated temp lake inspector, outside acctg for quarterly reports, now done in- house; audit .lone by outside contract., - ) Office & Administrative Office, General Supplies 2,900 4,668 3,075 3,500 i1/4 Telephone 1,400 1,430 1,475 2,350 7 +5') Postage 1,900 3,100 2,280 1,000 8 + 7) Printing 1,500 1,675 1,500 2,000 + 33 Legal Notices 1,000 2,270 500 3,000 9 +' - )oo Maintenance, Office Equip 1,` 11 0 933 3,400 1,700 10 - 7 ,0 Subscriptions, Memberships t10 15 210 200 - 5 Insurance, Bonds 3,500 5,024 5,050 200 t 3 Mileage, Expenses, Training 1,300 1,704 2,360 : ?, " >et0 1 TOTAL OFFICE & ADMN. 15,210 20,829 19,850 2/x.250 + Zl 1 IS0 7 , 7 (Add third line for FAX and increased phone service demands) 8 (Anticipate more mail communications with increased fees: underestimated 1991 budget:) 9'(Anticipate more code amendments, public hearing notices for variances, new dock licenses: underestimated 1991 budget) 10 (Over- estimated computer maintenance costs in 1991 budget) 1990 1990 1991 1992 Budget Actual Budget Proposed % Capital Outlay Furniture, Equip. 2,500 2,914 3,000 2,000 11 - 33 TOTAL CAPITAL. OUTLAY 2,500 2,914 3,000 2,000 - 33 11 (Provision for minor equipment upgrades) TOTAL ADMINISTRATION 130,630 135,606 155,825 164,730 + 6 Legal Legal. Services 18,000 15,493 20,000 18,000 - IO Prosecution 13,500 25,443 20.000 25,000 12 + 25 Process Service 1,400 42 500 300 - 40 TOTAL LEGAL 32,900 40,978 40,:,00 43,300 + 7 12 (Prosecution underestimated in 1991 budget, expense related to revenue) Consulting Services Long Term Management Plan 42,960 34,813 -0 - 0 - 13 Shoreland Rules Consultant -0 270 12,500 10,000 14 - 20 TOTAL CONSULTING SVC 42,960 35,083 12,500 10,000 - 20 13 (Consulting service complete as Management Plan adopted in 1991) 14 (Carry over from 1991 Shoreland Grant Agreement consulting service to be spent In 1992) Labe Data Collection /Publication -0- -0- 12,000 15 +100 Aerial Survey Lake Use Study -0- -0- -0- 1,500 +100 Wetland Inventory Mapping -0- 15,000 2,083 5,000 3,000 - 40 Public Information Public Access Use Studies 5,000 -0- 4,000 4,000 -0- TOTAL COMMITTEES 20,000 2,083 9,000 20,500 basis with +127 15 (Aerial survey to be re- instituted on every -other year X 86) return of normal water levels, estimating cost comparable to Conti z1ge11 cy 5% Admn Disb. 12,900 1,077 9,000 11 ,892 + 32 At ripprox. of TOTAL CONTINGL:NCY 12,900 1,077 9,000 11,892 + 37. TOTAL, ADMIN. DISBURSEMENT 239,390 214,827 226,825 250,422 + 10 17 (Carry over to 1992 budget) TOTAL COMBINED DISBURSEMENT 444,490 405,540 521,825 520,422 -0- 5/31/91 1 1990 1 1990 1 1991 1 1992 Budget A Actual B Budget P Proposed Eurasian Water Milfoil ( M) Weed Harvesting Program - -0- - -0- 1 114,000 1 114,000 -0- Barge Service - 62,400 5 54,400 3 32,000 3 32,000 _ _0- Personnel 6 68,175 b b5,284 4 45,000 4 45,000 Admn, UC Ins, FICA 3 39,170 4 49,769 3 31,OOCo 3 31,000 16 - -0- Operation Supplies 25,355 2 21,260 1 16,00J 1 16,000 - -0- Contingency 1 10,000 - -0- 1 12,000 1 1'.),()00 - -o- TOTAL EWM DISBURSEMEN.S 2 205,100 1 190,713 2 250,000 2 250,000 - 16 (Adjusted 1991 and 1992 item t to delete $ $13,000 i in admit s salary chargeback to EWM budget) Shoreland Rules Shoreland Rules City Gcanr - -� -0- 4 45,000 2 20,000 Agreement Reimbursement - -0- 45,000 2 TOTAL SHORELAND REIMB - 5/31/91 1 409 LAWS of MINNESOTA for 1990 Ch. 391, An. 2 EMPLOYEES. The duties of the district may be executed by employees of the municipalities Ft1N L 1967, c 907, sec q Subd. 2. EXPENSES. The expenses of the district shall be borne by the municipalities. The nion of the expenses of the district borne b each manic• ip lity must be in proportion to its net tax caoac_ity provide d that the rtion of My one municipality may not be more than 20 Lx rcent of the total expense or Less than S 200. IN1N L 1967, c 907, sec 4; NIIN L 1969 c-27-Z, sec 3) Sec. 54. 1103B.6351 FUNDING OF DISTRICT. Subdivision 1. BUDGET. The board must, on or before Ju 1 each Ita r re are and submit a detailed budget of the district's needs Per the next calendar }ear to the governing body of each municipality in the district with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provide d b each municipality. The goveming body of each municipality in the district shall revie the budgt and the board. upon notice from a municipality, must hear obiections to the budget. After the hearing, the board may modify or amend Lhe bu- dget. Notice must be ig pen to the m unicipalities of mod ifications or amendments INN L 1967. a 907, sec 51 Subd. 2. MUNICIPAL FUNDING OF DISTRICT. jaj The govcrnint hotly or board of supervisor of each municipality in the district must provid e the funds necessary to meet its proportion of the total cost determined by the board. A mu'+ici alit may raise the funds by any means that the municipality has to raise funds. The municipalities MY each le yv a tax not to exceed .00242 p ercent of taxable market value on the taxable Propert located in the district for fundin the district. The levy must be within all other limitation provided b law. U The funds must be deposited in the treasu of the district in amounts and at times as the treasurer of the district rectuires. IN1N L 1967, a 907, sec 5; N1N L 1969, c 272, sec 41 Sec. 55. 1103B.6411 REGULAPIONS OF DISTRICT. Subdivision I. AUTHORITY AND EFFECT. JA) The distLt p1ja adopt rules and regulations to effectuate the tp trpose of its establishment and the op wens gr anted to the district. U The rules and r_gulations have the ellect of an or dinance if declared by the board of directors of the disinct arai staters to the rule or regulation. L The rules and regulation of the district may be enforced by the district by injunction in addition to peng under this section. ININ L 1969, a 272, sec 61 Subd 2 ADOPTION PROCEDURE. A rule or regulation must be suitably titled IBncketed pvegraph notes cite text sourced Ne* language Is Indicted by underline deletions by iio +keedt. is • 0 1530 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473 -7033 REC'Il SUN 3 ':) 4 E V E N T S S C ll E D U L E June 1991 Sat 1 10:00 ana Lower Lake races 12:00 n Upper Lake races 2:00 pm Lover Lake races 12:00 n Minnetonka Boat Works Ski Show, Wayzata Bay Sun 2 6:30 am MN /WI Pro -Am Bass Tournament, North Shore Drive Marina 10:00 am Lower Lake races 12:00 n Minnetonka Boat Works Ski Show, Wayzata Bay 2:00 pm Lower Lake races Mon 3 6:00 r Lower Lake races Tue 4 6:00 pm Lower Lake races Wed 5 6:00 pm Lower Lake races 6:30 pm Upper Lake races Thu 6 6:00 pm Lower Lake races Fri 7 6:00 pm Lower Lakc races Sat 8 5:30 am Minnetonka Bass Classic, Spray Island 8:00 am Minnetonka Crossing, Wayzata Bay beach 10:00 am Lower Lake races 10:30 am Upper Lake races 2:00 pm Lower Lake races 2:00 pm Freshwater Foundation's J & B with a Splash, rnilfoil foundraiser, Excelsior Commons Sun 9 10:00 am Lower lake races 10:30 am Upper Lake races 1:30 Inn lower lake races Mon 10 6:30 pm Lower Lake races Tue it 6:00 pm of " It Wed 12 :00 pm of 'l 6:10 pm Upper Lake races Thu 13 6:15 pm Lower Lake races Fri 14 6:00 pm " „ " Sat 15 10:00 am I I I I " 12:00 n Upper (.;rke me es (ov(! r) /s,3/ LAKE MINNETONKA. CONSERVATION UISTRICT LMCD Events Schedule - Jiure 1991 Sun 16 6:00 am American Scholarship Foundation bass tournament, Wawaiosa Is. 5 -31 -91 If Is 10:00 am Lower Lake races 10:30 am Upper Lake races 1:30 pm Lower Lake races Mon 17 6:30 pm if It " Tue 18 11:00 am Minnesota State Sheriff's Assn fishing tournament, Mound Bay Park, Cooks Bay Wed 19 10:00 am Lower Lake races 1:00 pm of " It 3:00 pm of If It 6:30 pm Upper Lake races Thu 20 6:15 pm Lower Lake races Fri 21 6:00 pm of " it Sat 22 10:00 am of " If 10.30 am to " of 10:30 an. Upper Lake races Sun 23 10:00 am Lower Lake races 11:00 am " of if 1:30 pm If it 4:00 pm Mound City Days ski show, Cooks Bay dusk Mound City Days fireworks, Cooks Bay Mon 24 6:300 pm Lower Lake races Tue 25 6:00 pm Is to 01 Wed 26 6:00 pm to of 01 6:30 pm Upper Lake races Thu 27 6:15 pm Lower Lake races Fri 28 1:00 pm Minnesota Sailing Magazine sailboat show, l:xcelsi.or Park Tavern, Excelsior Bay 6:00 pm Lower Lake races 6:30 pm Upper Lake races Sat 29 9:00 am Minnesota Sailing Magazine sailboat show, Excelsior Park Tavern, Excelsior Bay 10:00 am Lower Lake races 2:00 pm is of if 2:00 pm Upper Lake races Sun 30 9:00 am Minnesota Sailing Magazine sailboat show, i'.::cels >ior Park Tavern, Excelsior Bay 5 -31 -91 If Is LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473- 70.3.3 • RECD JUN 31991 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDUI.E June 1991 Saturday 8 Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:15 a.m., Board for Lake inspection tour Minnetonka Boat Works docks, Wayzata 7:30 a.m., departure, prompt Monday 17 Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m., Norwest Bank Building Wayzata 900 East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 135 Superior Street, east entrance 17 Advisory Committee 5:15 p.m., LMCD office #160 Norwest Bank Building, Wayzata Wednesday 19 LMCD Response to Cities' Draft of Proposed Changes to Long-Term Management Program 7:30 p.m., Minnetrista City Hall Friday 21 Eurasian Water Milfoil. Task Force 8:30 a.m., Norwest Bank Building Wayzata 90C East Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 135 Superior Street, east entrance • Wednesday 26 LMCD Board of Directors' Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m., Tonka Bay City Hall 5 -31 -91 15-33 J A ri I I �l I I 11 r k Fi 1 ; E 1 - 1 1 1 t 1 1 T T. 1) , !�TP I Year 31 1 vM1 � < r' I I ' 1"1 ulllir. 7il:rIIIIIIt,lllt 111ll!1 �,),lll�ata iillnlr.uarll, ! uitr. l i i ullill:allilll �, i1ii1mr.nilta 55:311 W12) 5 -17511 ax: (lil'_') 59," M721 Lldr)r:1'EIJ1 iIIT 1JDT')r,r:IS 1;. Oi,T '1'o file 13o< - 3rd of. Directors Iaill�.c' 1linni�tunk�a Cow-.er.viati.un Di: tricL 4J,,yzitLa, t�li.nnesota tlit 1111Ve Llud1Li -,d till' cicci)ll:— )W: C(11111)int"d 1 )II Ia.ICIr _ilu'�it- 01, tfn' I Ih;l- NiiitluLi)Ill:ct COII:iC'rVLILlUII DLSCrICt= ilk; Uf 31, .1 'lllti tilt' IIl)lStj -'ti Cuiiihinud A- tLt:IIII`IlL. of rt_'V! 111(1_13 E p1. Ildlt - utt'S ,:11111 l'il�lllt)l':; 111 t. ill)li I,;ll�1nC'I' for the yt,Clr Lhcen Th( e 1 1 u,ifiC l o' 1 st Ali t_nr_ nt . tit t Ul ' r�'S1�1)11.�1.1)1.11ty of L11t' iILStCLC.L IfIL1n�.tJtJL'nl. I)tlr CI':�1�)Il:;lt�i1 ll�' _.) Lcl exf)LI, an 1 >1)ini.on on Lhc_ir f i tLitl nFr It t,ti Off t>ut rl I(At wJM1'� contluct(,sd our LrudiL in ilccurdal3C1) WILh 0-1 it-'I iI IV LICOI I)tt , i Ill( itifill �.tand:uds. `1.'hu:iu st.anli.�rd_� rt'<luirt' that %1'1: 111Off alld fol III the iludi': to (j1)L,iLn rL'cltJUtl Cl _iLirclllC tAbot.t WhOt-11CL Lill' i.lnclnCl�at ;;L�1t.I_Illltnt:i L1LL' fCtrl' UI IfIM1dLt_'Cliat IIU. : ;t dtel:!'llt., All ittll_ilt. llli „tlldtY.J Ctt:clllllllln�), tt':�L t)cl =il:i, u'Vldt'tlC:l' :.itl1)1>UCtlllt) th(-' IIIIdJUIIL �111U dl:�('LUSU; "t :'S in t1 111.I1C31<11 fill al1CI i. L I I 111C - 1lldt2 ,iS.;C' I I I fA t11e dC�C +.11lr i llO f �L i It 1 Ll:it�li cull _iLiilliI:lcalIt. t'Stl.11114 L ('S I�I'vk by i M1l:; uVi:I llcltlll!) t11( ' overall fl.I)dticlial. sLdt 'lle_'IIt Lit 1011 Lt1 C)!1C .Iil11Lt- I)I( )vlt_it1 a t( "t:iollcll)I1? I)il. ;lti for UIII UI -IIIIIVII. I. I) uur upini_un, Lhc fini111 ciLil staL(AI[t �llt:; t- I_fi�Lrl'ci tv fairly, in all 111,_1Le2 1. ial rt:s1) <ct. t fili�inl.i:,l Ix�sL)II of I Ins I,:akM1 hlfnnl�t ( )Ill ;,I CIA �(2rvat1011 1)i!11- rI I_,f 1�'�. ���Il,� r 31, 1990 X11 t LeVl!uu ex1,- , 3iLUri anti ci,ant_I1:, iu f IIitI I( fur f I'- yc,ll t:Ill�n (fnd LIl C:I)III i)r fill C It.tl t_)I:"nL'r;lli }' U� -ct 'I II OI1!I('�L UUI tl }:alrIin,lti(III W,1:3 111 1, 1�riln,.lri1 y iuI thl 1..1t; c: -1, 1)I ft_)tna! 11 (J ul n tl_))l c;ll '_l,(: 1),t_iic n�,nc fLl�ll .� t ,t.' -. �1llt.r �lti�iltlon<li flti�tilc3l�tl 1llfulW,_Itl il 111 , ,-11 t���1 nVl:1 =.i :.: �Ar1' L1)� a tail ,era ���nLGt full u.: L1:�_ f_1IIdlIl3I LAT `;ill "IlLt -t ? 131 lIl .,(.l fUC .SU1l 1 .In Ilt ctll,,l "il hiltl �lt;}I LIli U�7.'_Il i�,(I, lei I11 C 1., 1': -ti !II t r1� 11 I,!j . <a 1 t- C? f !: r, r I u] t u r L. t: C , F.F ._1 o .t: � A ) (.f CTS lJ, is ,+ r� it c z rr— 7--j f—" 1 O r t � CL LD •1' ( J CJ <; t CJ CT, (I) C7 O rl r� tU F,) (•� `�� r, •r cJ .r •r ,n ,r7 �.,� ,7) tip' rl tl t!) Ln r, r I u] t u r L. t: C , F.F ._1 o .t: � A ) (.f CTS lJ, is ,+ r� it c z rr— 7--j f—" 1 O r CL LD •1' ( J CJ F,) r, U '� .r •r ,n ,r7 �.,� ,7) tip' rl tl IT X11 rJ rl: , t� E� <n r, r I u] t u r L. t: C , F.F ._1 o .t: � A ) (.f CTS lJ, is ,+ r� it c z rr— 7--j f—" 1 O r CL LD •1' ( J CJ r, U '� .r •r ,n ,r7 �.,� rl IT X11 rJ rl: , t� E� <n r, r I u] t u r L. t: C , F.F ._1 o .t: � A ) (.f CTS lJ, is ,+ r� it c z rr— 7--j f—" 1 r, U '� .r •r ,n ,r7 �.,� rl IT X11 rJ L' �' (it ) r1 -.f O �D Ul In • C:) O C) ....{ ._i S � S V) W ,P O i .rj 1.J rJ J Ul V r"J U A7 �y FJ ra 3 V 9! u �y U rJ � -, t, l t -J •r } �� r, r I u] t u r L. t: C , F.F ._1 o .t: � A ) (.f CTS lJ, is ,+ r� it c z rr— 7--j f—" 1 1 i F r' D [1 'lit FII!At CIAI, L)'TA•Et•lli,Ilil; ot 31 ., 199u FINAHCIAII P1-:P(VT1fI(; HIT171 1 "u'Vt_ I lilt �11 I U 1 0 C t Ic 1, L ald ot-1wr u r y I I I I J I I1 L I i t I t r i c t :j 0 X 't 1! ov�rsi (Jilt- AC*CoU1JTLN'(; PUMCIE'S , i.' };t I,oko mimwtuilk(i CoIk.i(:rvI:ALjuIj 1'1 : I cUlif!!1;;IS to ytlltra P r 1cck -,I)[ (It ! Lo A la ItA ol :;ol1! ul, Hit' I!l'-ijor. puticieii of aCCULMLill(j: i lliodl,j [ed aCCILlill. Ile- Of ICC(AIIIL1II(J- C0fI_"t-,1LI('lltA L(•Vt 15 recO(jIliz"•cj III 1 11.2 p"L k)O j j j j ( , as tht ohlicyLiuii L; iflC -Li r r._,d. (W;If AND (Ja?po:;iLory b i,tkl; ill(Av -"I by Lip? 11 (A '3 of CJ( )I). I L U! r L,j by j col 11ILt.'l LII V'I dt'p):Af,_; IloL Aut d co (21 o',.'. uh it W 1: 1 U It -lit 1 11 GH*NERAL FIXED `1'1 V2 (21 ia I I(J( ' s %;'! I I C I I 01, L 1 L 1 1:: i L I I I, I 1(_j t I I ' I J L LiCI I Ud U I t-'d k I ow : 31, i')b9 $ 3 37 , 6 1 L) 1990 additiuns - 41,24.1 lialanct-- 31, 1990 J; 379 ,U01 a1w District's general fixed assets are recorded at historical CON. No provision fur duprucl-LIU11 in recorded. LJOASE Effective OcUMer LO, 1990 the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Mtlud into a Live yuar lease agrecmaUL With the Nutwest Hail for its currunt. OtfLc, slucy, 1vtna of the lu"se call for nunthly payn-M of $800.00 Luc the first ywat With uncalaL ions Cot variable costs during the r(jiiaiiiin(j term of the IDIA&M MUM JUPOOts undt r Lille HQW agre(,mcnL total For 1990 the District did not adult a forDul WyuL for the Sava the wK Fund. As such, only Milfoil Fund bw(j� ftt-�;:'js appear on the revenues, expenditures and changes in fund boluncu. PhNSION AND RETTREMMM PLANS All employees of the District aro cnverud Jq nitl(-r LN lqd)li(: EMq)Io7'V:; VeLiremunt Association or the Public Enpluymn QtirkTrK AssunIaLiun coordinated with Social Security. District cuilriNtions to Lion( coordinated plans amounted to $18,635 in Lhn Ywr nukA IMMAY1 35 1990. I Ell 71 :1 E� 4 D I 4 4 D Di - I'll-Ilifil"d i'lli'lir 1:i 11111 ;�1at1 at.t 7 1i ImIrlmril, �llitr 1311 (1fl2) 5 E x: (I112) 5i1 :3-1721 C0t-1,'-!.j-14T.S ON C'C'- TJ,jANC!-' Lake M.L'iwQLoIiLi Coll:eLvat.IGII DisLrict_ t 11 (,!XLII;Illl(' �d Lilt: fill of LJI 1J j I.';LL1(.,IL X'; of W11,1 fur ti yt , j r (: 11 c � t ct. ,-d 1)e-ii�l )'�-1 31, 1'01), 1. (Air rq. L)I_I r L! x ' 1111111 zlccordancu with (enerally auct.4_)Led iind Ow J)rt)Vl: i uL the Leyal Colilpliawe Audit GLlidt2 PL(- aA Cun11 , l1anct Force pur,AlonL Lo •,jln(j. StOLuL c.c, 6.0. exajIdrIZ1Li(�II i sUCh Lo-'jt. of Lilt ., 0 11!:; i r y L I j(_! c i r cum! auditing procedures a-'; We c The Legal Cel"PliLince Audit Guidu IVU 114.41 cat to tie L contra. i I Vj an 1) icl I I I ly, golf I of intoresLf publ indebtedness, a ;ld C111111a.; and 011jr ,�; included all of the listed catc�qories. 'I h(! , ( , ) f trot. tj*�;t that for the iLens the Lake Minllt'Wlj .,j Coiu;erv,it, loll 1)1:,;t-t coiliplied wiLh the material terms and Condit- lolls of a, ­plic'lblc It . fat provisiorls. Further, for tile itc-1111; 11CA 011 ClIr killd ti procedures referred to above, Lo Cllr 'ItAt'lil_ loll wit-. that tj,e Lake Minnetonka CorlsOtvat' I ' ""(1 not legal pi:ovisions. This report is iritc'rldud :solely for thtr u: atilt -r should not I C1 I Conservation District and . t- of t'lll�; r -p restLicLion is not inLcnded Lo lilld- is a platter of public record. April 2, 199 milirleapol is, r•jjrjrjk2_"'C)L'i PADACK 11 OF AMERICAN IN AITOU OF GFI I i i P� ;- t MEMBE, OF MINNE9C)TA SOCIF-1Y OF Gi Pf:r it D f IC t PAPADER OF PHIVATL COMPAIIII '; I il , 1 -' i, AV RIDGEDALE BRANCH YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS MINNETo"A MINN 5534 AREA CODE 7!5447700 I May 6, 1991 Len Harrell Mound Police Department 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Len: It is with great pleasure that I inform you that you have been chosen as the recipient of the Red Triangle Award for YMCA Community Service to Youth. This award is presented annually to an individual who has shown leadership, character, unselfishness, influence and resourcefulness during the preceding year. Enclosed you will find an invitation to the Ridgedale YMCA's Annual Dinner Meeting. We are hopeful that you will be able to attend this dinner to be recognized and to receive your award. If you are able to attend, please RSVP to the YMCA by May 20. Congratulations, Len. I share the sentiments of your peers and feel you are truly deserving of this honor. Sincerely, QLI-" Russ Horsch E3 :Utive Director RH:mal Enclosure say A PARTICIPATING 4EMBE0 0 THE MINNEAPOLIS AREA UNITED WRY RIDOEDALE BRANCH YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS 12 301 RIDGEDALE DRIVE A EA CODE 012/5770! ESOT 65343 May 6, 1991 Steve Grand Mound Police Department 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Steve: It is with great pleasure that I inform you that you have been chosen as the recipient of the Scott Howell Plummer Award. This award has been presented since 1928 and is given annually to an individual Who has shown leadership, inspiration to youth, initiation of good programming, dependable, has cooperated with the school system acid YMCA, and has shown high moral influence and character during the preceding year. Enclosed you will find an invitation to the Ridgedaie YPACA's Anr,u,:i Dinner Meeting. We are hopeful that you wii, be able to attend ;his dinner to be recognized and to receive your award. if you are cible to attend, please RSVP to the YMCA by May 20. Congratulations, Steve. I share the sentiments of your peers and feel you are truly deserving of this honor. Sincerely, G R -4 uss Horsch Executive Director RH:mal Enclosure P: 4` 1i �, . r;rIvATING jai RE <,L T � 1. O'. A hF.AO i6 A RE A ✓r A' 15"35 AN EOUALOPPORTUPJ Pr.Pt iyER WESTONKA PUBLIC SCHOOLS QVDFPENOF T SC- DISTRICT NO. 277 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD • MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 REVD MAY 2 91991 May 28, 1991 To: Westonka School Board District #277 Community Education and Services Council Westonka Area Mayors and City Council Members Westonka Area Legislators Hennepin County Commissioners The School Board of F(istonka School District No. 277 annually complies with M.S. 275.125 by holding a meeting for all affected parties regarding the program and budget of community services. This year the meeting is scheduled for 7:30 p.m. in the District Lecture Hall of the Westonka Community Center on Monday, June 10, 1991. Another year has passed in which community education and services in the Westonka School District have significant achievements and are pointing toward exciting new ventures. It is hoped that this meeting will promote continuation of fruitful discussions between the School Board and many other bodies or individuals on the subject of community education and services. After School Board Chair Bob Bittle calls the meeting to order, Community Education and Services Council Chair Dave Kunz will introduce the presentation of the program. we certainly hope you will be able to participate in this meeting. Sincerely, ames L. Smith, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools • • • / 1 fi t` t CE f MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472.0621 Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 525 -6210 Fax 472-0656 EMERGENCY 911 June 6, 1991 TOs Ed shukl.e, City Manager FROM: Len Harrell, Chief of Police SOBJBCTS New 48 Hour Rule This memo is to clarify our conversation of June 5 regarding the new Supreme Court ruling in the McLauglin vs. City of Riverside. This ruling requires a judicial review of all suspects detained within 48 hours of arrest when th<are has not been a previous warrant. At a meetirq with the Hennepin County Attorney's office and the Sheriff's iffice, it was l ?arned that immediately effective, all persons p'!aced in fail for detention, must have a judicial review for probable cause withit. yours of the tire of arrest. This will effect all probably - -use felony arrests and misdemeanors such as domestic abuse and violation of orders for protection when there is no warrant present. In 1990, the domestic abuses would have involved 33 that possibly could have required judicial review to detain. Tile law requires the oolice to arrest and to hold in 1omestic and now the provision for judicial review has been addel. We i %lso experienced approximately 11 felony arrests, not all of which were sent to jail, but if an estimate of 20% was used, that is an additional 21 judicial review processes. The bottom line of all of this is that there may be a significant impact of overtime based v-'on the procedures develop -2d by the courts for obtaining judicial review. am already considering an adjustment in the investigator's schedule that would necessitate an investigator to work on Saturdays. All of the implications or the impact of this new randite are difficult to predict at this point, as tha courts have not informed us of the procedures they intend to implement. I will keep you informed as to new developments as I learn of them. /s-s? POPULATION OF NEN COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES 1930 • 1990 MUNICI 1930 iv —0 :950 1%0 1970 1 too i BLOOMINGTON 2.655 31647 9,902 50,498 81 81,831 01,335 8ROOCITO CENTER 1,344 :.870 41284 24,3% 35,173 31,230 24,017 BROOKLYN PARKA 10,197 26,Z30 43,332 56,381 6POCCI YN 'OWNW P 1.1'? :,334 3,065 C HAMPL14a 2,093 4,104 9,006 16,849 aAMG:;h '71rhSN :P 563 816 572 : «AMP: :N 1::.A4; 828 CORCJRAN 1,252 225 1.:35 1,237 1,656 4 5.199 'P +STAL' :,865 2.3'3 5,113 24.283 70,925 25,541 23,788 GAVTON' 1.20: 2,631 4,000 4. "3+ DAYTON `OW%SX:P 715 141 118 DAYTON VILLAGE 331 227 195 DEEPMAVENY 530 1,026 1.823 3.286 3,853 3,716 3.6$3 EDEN PRAIR:E' 1,748 1,221 1.348 3.233 6,934 16,263 39,311 EDINAa 3.138 5,855 9.7" 30,482 ",046 46,073 4i EDINA :MORNI*&S:DEI 903 1.281 1.699 EXCELS:OR 1.020 2.563 2,523 2,367 EXCELSIOR TOw%Sm :P 425 1.475 2.467 EXCELSIOA VILLAGE 1,072 1, 422 1.763 FORT SNELLING 2.043 2,972 2.584 496 624 223 97 GOLDEN VALLEY 1.126 2,048 5.551 14.559 24,246 22.775 20.971 GREENFIELD 639 977 1.391 1.460 GREENr'80D 688 694 637 520 587 663 614 MAMOVER 50 9S 87 as 96 248 767+ MASSAII iOWNS'IP 7:6 756 639 750 917 1,766 1.951 MOPCINS 3,834 4.100 7,595 11,370 13,428 15,336 16.534 :NCEPEN.7E 1,124 1 1.203 1.446 1 2,W 7,492 LONG LACE 207 260 399 9% 1.506 1,747 1.984 LORE7'iO 179 271 340 197 404 MAPLE GROVE' 1.113 1.251 1.778 2.213 6,275 20.515 38,736 MAPLE PLAIN 288 360 479 7S4 1.169 1,421 Z.00S MEDIC:NE LACE 284 323 "6 419 IRS MEDINA 990 1 1.166 1 2,396 2,623 3,096 MINNEAPOLIS 464,356 492.370 $21 482.872 434,400 3"3,951 :68,183 M1NNETONKAa 4,601 6,466 11,8% 25.037 35,776 36,683 48.370 MINNETONKA 8EAL)l 111' 229 376 S" 586 Si3 $13 MINNETR ;STAa 1,179 1,302 1,%6 21211 2,876 3. 235 - 3.439 _ MOUND 668 1 2.061 5,440 7,57 ?, o,y�O 9.634 MOUND ( :SLAND PARC 2C'6 526 1,357 ---- NEW 394 691 3.552 23.180 :3,087 21.853 ORON0 1.795 2, 4,863 5.543 6,787 6.845 7,165 OSSEO' 561 738 1,167 2,104 1.908 2,974 2.704 PL'MO,;7H 1,623 2,989 51813 9.576 16.077 31,615 50.889 P:CrF:EtO 1,36: 3 47,502 42.523 47.I33 37,851 35,710 RnRP:N ^m,, 4,4? 4.518 ^ °9 15.3?I 16.9 :I. POCXFORC 5 ., 43 162 380 2.665' +G)GEPS ..• I74 258 378 544 651 6" AN'40N. 45 °.- 607 1,406 4,744 6,886 5,619 7,727 AJ 363 438 576 685 857 1.180 ,C.:. PAP, o. .. 37 2c.5ma 43.31' 48,883 42.931 43.787 3.197 4,223 4,646 5.917 568 1,067 1. 1.571 1.35 1.472 •m » m -- 4; 3..:i 3.621 3.606 •...,: *: 4:: :49 544 526 496 94:,411 732.431 15`39 r MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 4, 1991 C7 v • Those present were: Chair, Bill Meyer; Vice Chair, Geoff Michael; Jerry Clapsaddle; Michael Mueller; and Mark Hanus; City Council Representative, Liz Jensen; Building Official. Jon Sutherland; and Secretary, Peggy James. Absent and excused was Bill Voss and Frank Weiland. The following citizens were also in attendance: Bill Thai and City Clerk, Fran Clark. Reisignation of Planning Commfssfoner Mliliiam C Thai 8111 Thal announced to the Commission that as of May 31, 1991 he was no longer a citizen of the City of Mound, and therefore, regretfully, submitted his resignation to the Planning Commis- sion. Bill has served 5 -1/2 years on the Planning Commission. NUT S The May 13, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes were presented for changes and /or additions. MOTION made by Michael, seconded by Mueller, to approve the May 13, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes as written. Motion carried unanimously. Review of Tax Forfeit Properties by Fran Clark, Citv Clerk City Clerk, Fran Clark, reviewed the recommendations for the tax forfeited properties as foilcws: 1. PID 23- 117 -24 42 0082: 2. PID 24- 117 -24 It 0020: 3. PiD 24- 117 -24 44 0074: 4. PID 23- 117 -24 34 0087: 5. PID 30- 117 -23 22 0026: 6. PID 30- 117 -23 22 0027: Release for public auction. Retain for wetlands conservation Release for public auction. Retain for conservation area. Release for public auction. Release for public auction. Mueller referred to the Minutes of the August 26, 1990 Planning Ci mnission meeting and asked Fran if parcels could be divided prior to releasing. Fran stated that you cannot separate a par- cel if it is buildable and currently one parcel. The City is the caretakers of these lots, the State and the County really have the control. Prices cannot be negotiated, the price is that of the current market value plus any assessments. Mueller suggested that the tax forfeited properties be advertised in the City newsletter. IS3? Planning Commission Minutes June 4, 1991 Page 2 • MOTION .node by Manus, seconded by Mueller to approve the release of certain tax forfeited property as recorwwnded by staff. Motion carried unanimously. Review drafted Truth In Sale of Housing Ordinance. Building Official, Jon Sutherland, explained to the Commission that the City Attorney has drafted an ordinance relating to Truth in Sale of Houses for the City of Mound. Jon suggested that the Commission review the ordinances adopted by Minneapolis and Hop- kins for comparison. He did inform the Commission that the City of Minneapolis is currently revising their ordinance, and sug- gested that the Director of Truth in Housing for Minneapolis come to a Planning Commission Meeting to talk about the ordinance and answer questions. He suggested that the Commission compile a list of questions they may wish to ask the Director for Diin- neapolis. Jon explained that there is more to complete and review than ,Just this ordinance, such as the application for examination, inspec- tion requirements, and the disclosure report. Meyer asked the Commissioners, "What are we trying to accomplish ?" All the Commissioner's agreed on the following: - Truth in Housing, not code compliance - minimum health and safety standards - Inform buyer of zoning standards and setbacks /building envelope - buyer beware Jensen commented that this is going to take longer to develop than originally thought. Mueller suggested that the Commission become intimately familiar with the proposed ordinance before they discuss it with the Min- neapolis Director. Jon Sutherland suggested that the Commission review both the Minneapolis and Hopkins ordinances and compile questions to ask the Minneapolis Director. Sutherland suggested the commission address Section 318:35, Or- ganization of Board. Is the Planning Commission the proper body to be this board? The Commissioner's determined that this board should be separate from the Planning Commission, however, one or two Planning Commissioner's could be on the board to act as liaison. Jensen will ask the Council at the next COW meeting who they feel the board should be. is Mueller noted that condominium were not included in this proposed ordinance. The Commissioners agreed that condominiums should be included. #,a Planning Commission Minutes June 4, 1991 is Page 3 The Truth in Housing Ordinance will be reviewed agarn a* t -he July workshop meeting. The Commissioners are to review the Min- neapolis and Hopkins ordinances. Review revised Planning Commission Work Rules: Guideline fo the Intervtewino and Selection of Candidates for Planning Co mmis - Secretary, Peggy James. reviewed the proposed guidelines for in- terviewing. The Planning Commisslon amended item 3, as follows: "3. If the applicant is unable to attend the scheduled Inter - view. !`he - fnlrervierr -rnay- r►ofi - t- resehede }ed--- csv�erc�r -r -the Planning Commission may reschedule any interviews at their discretion within 7 days of the original interview date." It was determined that the Planning Commission needs flexibility to reschedule interviews or not. it ?s their intent to interview and vote during the same meeting so applicants are fresh in their minds. Michael noted a typo on page 4, number 20: the wor_. "buy" should be "but." MOTION made by Michael, seccnded by Mueller, to approve the Planning Commission Work Rules as amender. Motion carried unanimously. City-C ouncil Representative Report Jensen reviewed the City Council Minutes of May 14, 1991 meeting. Discussion: Format for Workshop Meet of J ur 24 1 99 1- Rental Housing Maintenance and Licensin - Jensen suggested that at the meeting the citizens be allowed to speak once, and if they wish to speak again it must be a new topic. Anyone wishing to speak should stand at the podium, and announce their name and address. The Commission determined that Building Official, Jon S,itherland, f� would give an overview /executive summary of the prooser7 or- dinance. It was suggested that points of discussion be listed on a bulletin board for everyone to see. The secretary handed a proposed news release and public hearing notice to the Chair for his review. The Commission discuslecd at • length if the citizens should be charged $5.00 for a copy of tree proposed ordinance as stated In the news re lease. Suthf2r i and spoke in favor of requiring a fee. /5 V Planning Commission Minutes June 4, 1991 Page 4 MOTION made by Mueller, seconded by Meyer to recommend to the City Manager that the proposed Rental Housing Maintenance Ordinance be distributed free of charge to Interested parties. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission determined that they would discuss the format of this meeting again at the July 8th Planning Commission meeting, after the Board of Appeals. Miscellaneous Discuss The Commission directed staff to write a letter of commendation for Bill Thai and have the letter signed by the Planning Commis- sion, City Council and Staff. NOTION made by Mueller, seconded by C 1 apsarid 1 e, to ad- journ the meeting at 10:30 p.m. Motion carried unanim- ously. Chair, Bill Meyer Attt • • ISM 0 . LMCD MEMBERS CITIES MEETING SUMMARY WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 29 MAY 1991 Cities represented included: Tonka Bay, Mound, Deephaven, Orono, Wayzata, Greenwood, Woodland, Spring Parf : Minnetonka Beach, Excelsior, and Victoria. Agencies represented included: LMMCD, DNR, and Metropolitan Council. ITEMS DISCUSSED Underlying Principles: A review of Underlying Principles, as adopted by the LMCD on 24 April 1991 was discussed. Motion made and second to adopt page 1 of the Underlying Principles. Motion carried. Motion made and second to adopt page 2 of the Underlying Principles, which includes a section of shoreland protection. Motion failed. Shoreland Grant Agreements As of the time of the meeting, six cities have signed the Shoreland Agreement - Deephaven, Excelsior, Minnetonka Beach, Shorewood, Mound, and Woodland. Six cities were waiting to see outcome of this meeting before signing agreements - Minnetrista, Minnetonka, Victoria, Tonka Bay, Greenwood, and Spring Park. Two cities, Orono and Wayzata, will not or likely will not sign agreement. The remaining issue to be resolved for Shoreland Grant Agreement - Technical Committee. Technical Committee pros: 1. Communication among cities is necessary. 2. City's shoreland ordinances would benefit from exchange of ideas and information. 3. DNR may look more favorably on ordinances subject to Technical Committee review. • /sy 3 h Technical Committee cons: 1. Waste of time and money. 2. Duplication of efforts. 3. Cities may receive comments and input at public hearings to adopt individual ordinances. Motion made and second to recomm the need for the Technical Committee and its inclusion in the Shoreland Grant Agreement. Five cities in favor, five cities Opposed, one city abstained. Technical Committee stands and the cities may choose whether they will participate in committee. Those cities who do not sign the Shoreland Grant Agreement and may pursue an agreement separately with the DNR. Long Term Management Program for Lake Minnetonka: The process -ias discussed for continuing review and finalizing a Long Term Management Program. • Motion was made and second to accept the revised draft of the Management Program prepared by Wayzata as the base document to the LMCP and Metropolitan Council for revising the Program. Motion was amended to include the 12 June 1990 letter from the Mound Mayor for consideration as part of the revision of the Management Program. Motions passed with one abstention. Motion was made and second to include Orono's goals and objectives document dated 19 April 1991 as a guide to the LMCD and Metropolitan Council for revising the Management Program. Motion passed. Process: James Uttley of the Metropolitan Council will be responsible for revising the document. A suggestion gas made and agreed upon to revise the Management Program one chapter at a time with meetings of the LMCD member cities to consider each chapter. Next meeting was tentatively scheduled for 19 June 1991 at 7:00 PM at the City of Wayzata City Council Chambers. Suggestion was made and agreed upon to hold a separate meeting to be schedule'i 'it a later date to discuss the LMCD budget process. • 1544 League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Wrapup Sessions The League of Minnesota Cities will hold four legislative w"puW sessions June. 2427, 1991 to discuss new laws enacted during the 1991 session of the Legislature. To register please return the registra- tion form below to: LMC Finance Department, l eague of Minnesota Cities, 183 University Avenue East, St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526. Please contact Lynda Woulfe at (612) 227 -5600 if you have any questio --_ — — _ _... — — —, -t r _ I LMC legislative Wrapup sessions registration I Registration fee is $25 per Person advanced; $35 owsite (includes lunch). I I Please make your check payable to the 1,xaguc of Minnesota Cities. I I Name I I Name I Title _ I I Address i I Phone I City I I (we) will attend the session in: I I Brooklyn Park =No. attending I ( =Grand Rapids [^,� I I Alexandria l_J Mankato Total enclosed I ' Cut ON bound Not and return to I I LW Finance Depsatunmt I I 1g3 University Avenue Fsst I St- Psul, MN 55101.2526 Agenda 9:30 ism Registration 1 042:1 S and taxation. R enutaxation. 10:00 a m. -Noon ev John TofflUnaon, Sarah Hackett Central government, Joel Jamnik local aid Dote practices Levy limits open meetings Truth in tsxstkm Fnvirtmment. Joel Jamntk 2:14-2:30 pm P,reale Solid waste & recycling .9 South Wet1wit Preservation 200.2:45 pm Personnel & !eti ement. Joe! Januitk Add �-' ial revenue issues, Pay equity Jok ,m:+nson, Sarah Flarkeu Workm' compensation Bargaining 2AS -3:00 pm Discipline & discharge Elev..:ons and ethics. Ann 11118W Early retirement 3:043:15 p.sa. Voon•1:oo p.sn. lynch Transportation. Satoh Hackett Sites Monday, Jane 24 TuesdaY, Jane 25 Grand Rapids Alexandria Sawmill Inn Park Inn 2331 Pokegams 1.94 and Hwy. Avenue South .9 South %%t)rkrd c trdcral %!w resoltuni , .SSS(1tN d.lid .ununc; th Illw )11 ed i ,ilv! •kilt` tlrt• ltKA1 lK rt t�t)t u :rn� untl. (itctat sh Ix- t!rd Ix ol I n )rt n,tl . Suter hit•. I h. t,f till l,, t ;ilnt;il t;rnrr�r? Liro)t, a� t'null'. t h.1s t ur tnti �1 rxlk rnl wefrt� t a t r)In dt: +1t �r In G rrnr, t1 the { t i l l.v d)rrt t. Krt stn•t•t wt,rkt n)rtn! n),t� A ridge rrtr� t rt •: t )l !•� tyo , s )Ix Wednesday, Jam 26 T*oTA yt Jane 27 Broahlyn Pstt Mankato 11e Club House at Holiday Inn DownlOwn Edinburgh 101 Main 9700 tAinhrook Crossrig mt V ,, , Ltt; J u � Tit 11, i f 1,tll( l�, I',')! UO JUN 'i 'i'i 'Il'i a Y w i P c) , t �! ',,' 5 I ) C. ; t ! , ` . t- FI t I k I , : C. I I (I ti a I 'o I Is di-,';i�-t t 11 ll( 1' 11 (ill 11 v a I lt vo t 11 11 f lit o 1 1 'd t f FT) t gi11 GLN OLSON Scnalur. District 43 123 Staty Officc Building St. Paul. NiLnncm„w ;;1:< lf,l_') ?9h -1'n_' 1 Ionic: 6 ('nuns% Road I Ili Wc,t Mound, % innc. , ta (61- 47 ;3(it, June 5, 1991 Edward Shukle, Jr. Manager City of Mound V ty Hall 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ed: The dust is settli the fallout is yet Governor is making liberal use of his of bills that have biennium. Senate stale of Minnesota ag on the 1991 legislative session, but some of to be known. It appears at this time that the every effort to avoid a special session by a line item veto power, as well as the vetoing "tails" of financial obligation into the next For your information, I am enclosing a preliminary summary of legislation on topics affecting local government or of potential concern to you as city officials. Because of help that I have at home, my life is a little less encumbered this year so I am available to meet with your city council if you would like to discuss these and other issues of concern at one of your council meetings. Please call my office and arrange an appropriate time. If I don't hear from you, I may call you. It would be helpful to me to learn from you as I prepare for the 1992 session. Sincerely, Gen Olson State Se .-iator GO :cd Enclosure C O,l1111`fTLES • I - dui;,tinn • 1 1111..luun I unw;;1. 1 ) • 1 i VI hllk t IIIIK • 11tyL .uul'L,r IV, • I S1`110*1N(,: )cc l I,Icn Pl,iiI Ition,� ell. %linnctonka Bc,ich. Minncui�la. r 11��;,,fLuu1 �1NNET�y ! t t P LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT (r ':i Y. n'.,•n IA ti.^ .. `t.Ili 1 1.' W4vr'n!A M q 41!;C`(A Y0 if II IlKW 6171473.701.1 ��70N . June h, 1991 EUGENE R.5TRAMMEN 1 xl C'Uli D110CTCX4 BOARD MEa Re r Deputy Bernard lity cnr ! _ D" H.Codaan.Chm M i n n e sota Slate She ri i f'r. r1 ssociat i.on + +� P. 0. Box 623 AbM O. Falar, vkr chair O"Phwen South St. YaTal, M'; ViUi`i 0-W- ftooc K S -*Wy sw" Pak ja Dear Deputy Bogenrei -f - : M aTemnw DOM earn vlcroAa M wvin 9 0 „ The Lake Minnetonka Conset ion District Board of Directors, at its Tor" Say Sae" CaAaan meeting May 22, 1991, a1)1)r your open water fisIt int, totlruament M1nnW1111ta scheduled for Tuesday, .J 18, 1991 from the bi innetooka Boat Works a t J 0oblohwol EaoaYlw W The Special Event was ap proved with the followin st i ptrlat ions: Y 1 < ! I l: 1 JoEUan L Won onwa ThommMaMnwn 1. Permit requirements of the liennepin County Sheriff's t"ater Patrol, Wayata Rabe" K.Prbtury the City of Mound, and the i)1iR Gisheries must be met. Minrow" Rol M Rnow shoi OOS 2. The use of starting guns or hull horns is riot permitted. Tho"M W. Raw Mound Rabe" E. SWUM woodirld 3. Participants must be not -i f ied to clean aI l weeds froth watercraft, including wet wells a111f other internal. areas as well as external areas, including trailers. 4. Participants must be not.ificd that they are rc- duired to comply with applicable LMCD boatirg ordinances, copy enclosed; of particular im- portance are the regulat. ions 1 unit. ing watercraft speed to 40 mph and noise to 82 dbA. 5. Deposit refund is subject to: a. Compliance with the above stipulations. b. A copy of the DNR permit being, submitted prior to U1c event c. A copy of the completed I)Nk 'Ioitrnament Fishrr,g Report being sub- mitted by June 30. d. The completed LMCD Specirii 1�:ent. Report, f1,: „t pro: i dol, 1)eing submitted by June 30. Your cooperation in our Save Lhe Lake safety 1)ro;;ran; it; tii,irr4'1 1:0-d. Sincerely, LtcKE MINNETONKA CONS ERVATLON DISTRICT Rachel Thibault, Administra: ivy `1ccl;tiici.tn enc: application, Event report c /app: City of Wayzata D.N.R. Minnetonka Boat Works, 1;ayzat.:i C: Tom Maltinson Lake Use Chair Robert }'illy ;bury City cf Plound as notification of location LAKE MIN NETONKA C ONSEJI VA IiC) "J Pl'�THIC T June 6, 1991 T0: L?fC.) Atunicipalitp i FROM: Executive Director Ucre 5t I0i:r,:1(i1 SUBJ: LMCD 1990 A.:dit The LMCD Board of Directors, at: its '9.'c -2, 1991 moot in,l., accepted the audit of the Dcccinl)CY H, P)90 ! in:n .' i;i l statements for the District. We are pleased to enclose a copy of tlii s ;wt;ini ;i l ;nid i t. for your information. ERS:jlm enc c /enc: State Auditor's Office LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT LAKE USE CONNITTEE AGENDA Monday, Junco 1 7 , 1991. 4:30 Fri LMCD Office, Corif e: ence Room 900 E. Wayzata Blvd, Suite 160 (hlevator acres!; for Handicapped; use west entrance on Wayzata Blvd. A. llennepin County Lakes lmprovt-ment Report: 1. Response to buoy marking of submerged island in Carmens Bay 1. Addition of slow bt►oy rat Skogbergs Point. West Arm 3. Slow buoy place at North Arm G. Slow buoy placement at north end of Seton Channel 5. Effect of higher lake levels on buoy plarement and other higbf.r water lake influences B. Special Events 1. MN State Sheriff's Association Bass Fishing 'tournament, 6/18/91 - Ease off and weigh in changed to Mit,neronka Boat Works Wayzata from :Mound Bay Park 2. Deposit RFC f ands C. Critique of Lake Inspection Tour D. Charter Boat Reg I ration U1)date E. DNR Su mina r} of 1 roposeJ 1) ersorn. ►I Watercraft Legil.lation F Water Patrol ftc-port 1 . Report 0 i in% -, o y of l;tr,ict. Tres on the lake ?. Additional Busill —;s ion: ►I Bw, icier,;; ri , cOinmond—i by th(, Colimit tee :. Frot-in aii Appeal 6 ,' 7 91 Uag7ue of Minnesota Cities PR G E I V _ e $_ / V 5 `/ 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612) 2275600 (FAY.: 221 M86) June 7 1991 RE I J I (" TO: Mayo �, Managers, and Clerks FROM: Dona W .Slater, Executive Director SUBJECT: GOVERNOR'S LINE -ITEM VETO OF TWO TAX PILL PROVISIONS some a. you receivs3 a June 6th letter on this subiect. If so, please ignore that letter; this letter provides the latest corrected information. On May 31, Governor Carlson dine -item vetoed two sections cf the omnibus tax bill. By far the more important of these provisions is Article 2, section 4, which is described below What the Bill Contained Before the veto * Distribution formula for 1993 and 1994 aid payments fr the Local Government Trust Fund, containing the revenues frnnn ::he 1/2 cent local option sales tax plus 1 -•1/2 cents of the state sales tax. *Payment from the trust fund in 1993 and 1994 fo: LGA, HACA, disparity reduction aid, three minor aids, and part of income maintenance paymients to counties. *Distribution of growth in the trust fund for fiscal years ?994-95 compared to 1.992 -93 estimated as follows: 24% for income maintenance Std, 42% for growth in HACA as payment for class rate reductions, and 335 available for growth in aid formulas. What The Veto Did *The Governor's veto eliminated the provisions listed in the previous secti:,ri. The Governor appari_ntly intended to force the 1992 legislature to adopt: new distribution formulas, including a provision for 67`t of the fiscal year X994 -95 growvh to go to income ma-,ntei. " -., r I /M) rather than the 24' in the ..,riginal bill. 1 114 is c jrrer,tl� a state general fund obliga Lrd the use -)t 67% of tr>>.st - fund growth for I/M would leave no money for growtt in aid formulas such as IAA. *Due to a technical error., the r— icrnor idled •co achieve ais intended purpose; inr' the new t�tx law, now assigns T.LL of the trust Lund revenue for fiscal years 1994 -95 to city and township Local Government Aid (LGA) . in fiscal year 1994 (taxes ana aids payable in 1993), LGA would increase from $282 million to about $820 million. The trust fund would not pay for HACA or I /M. 0 *With the technical error, the fiscal year 1994 -93 trust fund distribution is very strange, and the 1992 legislature should adopt new distribution formulas, similar co the vetoed provisions. The technical error appears to avoid the Governor having the upper hand in the 1992 negotiations, since with no bill, he would get. NO trust fund money for I/M to help the state's general fund. The League will work for new distribution formulas in the 1992 session, with minimal trust fund revenue going to I /M. *The League objects to the Governor's desire to have 67% of trust ft:nd growth go to income maintenance aid, which is currently a state General Fund obligation. This amounts to local governments imposing a local option sales tax which brings a dedicated matching share of the state sales tax, and then having mos* of the growth in these funds put back into the state general fund. It is also contrary to the Governor's stated purpose of dis state and local finances. What the Veto Does Not Do *The veto does NOT reduce aids payable in 1991 and 1992. *The veto does NOT reduce the importance of county adoption of the local option sales tax by July 1, 1991. It is still. true that any county not adopting the tax will lose all of its county, city, and township aids, totalling far more than it saves on the sales tax. Cities should continue to urge their county boards to adopt the new 1/2 cent sales tax, through resolu� ions and other means. *The veto does NOT affect levy limits for 1992. Line -item Veto of Appropriations for Local Government Service Sharing and Combination Incentives Governor Carlson also vetoed the $1.5 million appropriation for incentives to local governments for start -up costa for sharing servicas or merging governments. He stated that f7.nancial incentives are not necessary for such efforts to occur. cv r � ! ass ociation of metropolitan municipalitie� -3 June 6, i7il To: Member City tiff FROM: Bob Long, Presidet 13 U EC' JUN i k':: AMM legislative policy committee membership; line item veto or Ixrrtions of tax bill AMM Legislative Policy Committees need volunteers Ah1M1l legislative Policy Committees need Y(W! As city officials, can you afford to speculate and anticipate what the governor and the Legislature might do? Many critical issues face the cities. As we learned during the rccend concluded session, we must let tLe Legislature know what we think would be the best solutions for our cities. We were behind the doors during sensitive negotiations on the omnibus tax bill - not on the outside hx�hing in, Why ". We had cogent policy and articulate, persistent presentation. To help develop these good government uriuhons, we look to our legislative p0hL study committees. The Atv.Sl Board of Directors will be making two year appoirtrnents to these committees - the backbone in developing organ0ational goals and Imsitions on is -ues, and in determining the future mle of our cities. It is important for your city to be reprcu rtted on one or more of these committees so your views may be expressed and included in the critical uevel« pmcni stage of A NN p ohk'y- setting. Unly through active participation by city officials such as you can decisive rre,rghtful : i well plotted positions on critical metro problems be developed. presented to the L_e: ,1:u,ire a+ld for g(; .rr,.. :1% a ..,,:�. We cannot afford to be silent. We cannot allor(l to be the pen ,'d omvenicia chopping block when the stale runs into fiscal roadblocks. We cannot alloy, the stair tc pre- en( I(xal ordinances or impose new mandates without consid. ation of the fiscal impact on ( We can counter these very real scenarios by developing clear, strong policies in the areas of nu,tro agcncres, revenue, housing, Craw p ortation and general legislation. BUT WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please take a few minutes to review the description (,t tt,e f(�e starn.!mv - (nominees and volunteer a small amount of your time to make an impart b} compleling and returning tic enclos(d form. The committees generally meet about four tunes each year in •Aug,r�t and 5e htc rnh. r. I tic Board of Dtrcct would like a clear indication of all persons willing to give a part of their time and energy to serve one or more of the committehs. The Board also welcomes suggestions for specific issues or concerns that could be studied by the committees. If you have questions, please contact either Roger Peterson or Vern Petersen in the AMM Office (227. 4008). The Board of Directors has decided to examine the state of metropolitan governance generally and the Metropolitan Council specifically. To that end, a task force is being formed through the auspices of the Metro Agencies Committee, chaired by Bill Barnhar±. The task force will examine in depth metro governance and what changes should, or could, be made. Such a study is timely in light of Gov. Arne Carlson's giving notice that the Met Council will be disbanded unless it can become more meaningful and relevant. The task force is not limited to Metro Agencies Committee members. While its membership would be drawn wholly from within AMM, the task force would listen to suggestions and thoughts frgm other "good government" organizations. Omnibus Tax Bill - Line-item Veto Regarding the line -item veto of the omnibus tax bill, the veto by Carlson did not change the optional half -cent sales tax mechanism, nor did it substantially change the two -cent dedication foi local governmen, aid. The governor vetoed the section that appropriated the trust fund distribution for the state's next biennium (FY 1994 and FY 1995). This would affect city calendar years 1993 and 1994. The disagreement was over how much of the growth in the two -cent sales tax dedication would be returned to the state budget versus how much would be available for future aid increases. Clearly there was - or is - confusion among the governor's representatives on this issue, but the veto does not change the near future as far as cities are concerned. The veto does, however, indicate the direction for 1992 action. Cities must be very forceful in the 1992 session to: 1. establish a fair and equitable aid distribution system, 2. ensure that the two -cent dedication continuation includes growth: and. 3. initiate discussions for a constitutional dedication of the two -cent revenue stream for local government. The governor has issued to us a challenge. We nee(, to be prepared to meet that challenge if the half -cent sales tax option and the two -cent dedication is to be truly meaningful and tj.,iv signify die bc+tinning of the separation of local funding from the state. It should be noted that the other line item veto was for a city /town /county cooperation and co solidaw provision that was not supported by AMM. Current law provides appropriate :0 accom!"i -h cost - saving joint power operations. DISTRIBUTION NOTE: This bulletin has been distributed to Mayors, and Council members. However, if other city ernplovees such as finance directors, housing odtwers, planner, for example, would like to serve on an AMM legislative policy committee, picasi' suhutit their names. AMM Legislative Policy Committee Descriptions I. MFTRUPOI_ITAti ArzyN 'IFC (`ommiTTt Considers legislative issues and other policy issues related to the Metropolitan C ounol and Metropolitan Agencies. The committee monitors the structure and relationship 1vtween the regional entities and local units (A government, and reviews amendments to the Metrolx)htan Development Guide Policy Chapters or any new chapters developed. The conun;Uec h;L" previously developed policy on land use planning, metropolitan significance, solid waste management and Met Council selection process. It also reviews the Council's yearly bu;tgi•t 1A. M ETRO QyERNANCE STUDY TASK FORC A special task force under the guidance of the Metropolitan Agencies Committee is being: formed this year !o make a detailed and thorough analysis of the governance system in metropolitan area. This would include a look at the role the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Agencies (RTB, MWCC, MTC, MPOSC) play in the governance system, and what changes should be made. The task force also will look at the necessary regional tasks to be performed and make recommendations with respect to which unit or level of government could perform those tasks most effectively. This will be an intensive effort that probably will take a year to complete. City officials may serve on this special task force without being a member of the full Metropolitan Agencies Committee. 2„ MuNt Ip 1. Fy N ' R .oM4UTT F. Considers any matter concerning city revenues, property taxes and city expenditures, including state aid formulas and dollars, levy limits, property tax assessments and fiscal disparities. The committee will be looking carefully at the ; :L—S of the 1941 omnibus tax bi!l. Areas of concentration would include the two -cent sales - ix dedication, a new aid formula and distribution of growth of the two -cent sales tax revenue. A constitutional amendr; ent for the sales tax dedication will be discussed. 3- Housme. AND ECn NOMIC DEY J.oEmFNT Considers all issues rela, I to economic development and housing, including subsidized housing, affordable l ,,ing. and activities o; the Metropolitan HRA. Reviews all amendments to the Metrop; Council's Housing Guide Policy Chapter. Reviews and develops policy dealing with economic development issues, HRAs, Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and development authorities. 4. T A. SPnRTATION Cnmm rrFF Considers all major issuer related to air and surface transportation, including funding sources at all government levels. The 10 elected officials who represent the AMM on the Transpor Advisory Board (T.A.B.) and the eight city staff officials who represent AMM on ttrc Techr.;c;; Advisory Committee (TAC) are encouraged to be members of this committee, along with other city officials. 4. G, NFRAI. 1X -NI ATION CONISI11'TFE Considers issues which have impact on tetropolitan area cities outside the scope of other A.MM committees. In the past, this committee deve�oped Ioh: s on issue such as municipal consolidation, pensions. PERLA, comparable worth, data pf i%ac%. contractor licensing and hkal control/atithority. Policy Committee Sign -Up Form (Please return no later than June 24, 1991) Name City Title City Preferred Mailing Address: (street) (city) (ZIP code) Preferred Telephone Contact Number: Please Indicate Committee Choice: (first and second choice) Municipal Revenues Metropolitan Agencies Metropolitan Governance Study Task Force only Housing and Economic Development General Legislation Tranportation Suggested Issues to Be Studied: Please Return to: Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 183 University Ave., East St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Attn: Carol Williants