Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1990-07-10 CC Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL PACKET - 7/10/90 #1 CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA AOE ■o, MOUND CITY COUNCIL RBOOLAR METZ= 7230 P.Y. 'POEBDA?. JQLT 10, 1990 CITT COOMIL 01®:118 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. 2. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 26, 1990 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. Pg. 1984 -1993 3. CN #90 -924: FRANK BOESE, WESTONKA FOODS, 5229 SHORELINE DRIVE, LOTS 7 -20 AND 26 -35, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT F PID #13- 117 -24 34 0072. REQUEST: SIGN VARIANCE. Pg. 1994 -1999 4. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING NO PARKING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LESLIE ROAD BETWEEN MANCHESTER ROAD AND BRIGHTON BLVD. Pg. 2000 -2004 S. REPORT ON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT COMMISSION'S (MTC) UPCOMING PUBLIC HEARING ON SERVICE ISSUE. Pg. 2005 -2006 6. COMMENTS i SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT. 7. PROPOSED TELEPHONE SYSTEM FOR CITY HALL AND OTHER MUNICIPAL FACILITIES. Pg. 2007 -2024 8. UPDATE ON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING LOTS. Pg. 2025 -2030 9. REPORT OF THE 1990 MISSION AND MEMBERS[IP SERVICES TASK FORCE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES (ANN). Pg. 2031 -2051 10. APPROVAL OF PAYMENT REQUEST #i, CiTY HALL ADDITION AND RXNOVATION. Pg. 2052 -2055 11. APPROVAL OF FINAL PAYMENT REQUEST - 1990 DREDGING PROJECT. Pg. 2056 -2057 12. PAYMENT OF BILLS. Pg. 20 . -2070 13. INPORURTIOXMOCELLUMUS A. Department Head Monthly Reports for June 1990. Pg. 2071 -2104 Page 1982 B. L.M.C.D. Representative's Monthly Report • for June 1990. (To be handed out Tuesday). C. L.M.C.D. Mailings. Pg. 2105 -2113 D. 1991 Adopted Budget of the L.M.C.D. Pg. 2114 -2119 E. Planning Commission Minutes of June 25, 1990. Pg. 2120 -2122 F. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) has invited us to attend a breakfast meeting on Wednesday, July 18, 1990, 7:30 A.M., at T. Wrights in Minnetonka. The purpose of the meeting is to be able to provide direct input to the ANN on what you think about the organization and its efforts. Please let Fran know by Friday, July 12th if you want to attend. Pg. 2123 G. RZMINDBA No C.O.W. meeting in July. Next C.O.W. meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, August 21, 1990. H. Joint meeting of the City Council, Economic Development Commission and Planning Commission, Tuesday, August 7, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. C Page 1983 rV 0 June 26, 1990 MINUTES - MOUND CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 26, 1990 The City Council of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 26, 1990, in the Council Chambers at 5341 Haywood Road, in said City. Those present wera: Mayor Steve Smith, Councilmembers Andrea Ahrens, Liz Jensen, Phyllis Jessen and Skip Johnson. Also present were: City Manager Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Clerk Fran Clark, Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer Join Cameron, Building Official Jon Sutherland, Recycling Coordinator Joyce Nelson and the following interested citizens: Brad Sohns, John Phillippi, Jerry Gibbs, Tom Casey, and John Royer. The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. The City Manager introduced the new Building official, Jon Sutherland, to the City Council. Mr. Sutherland will be starting this position on July 9, 1990. The Council welcomed him. • 1.0 MINUTES NATION made by seconded by to approve the minutes of the June 12, 1990, Regular Meeting and the June 19, 1990, Committee of the Whole Meeting, as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.1 PUBLIC HEARING DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS City Manager Ed Shukle explained that the revised amount was $3,062.23. Mayor Smith opened the Public Hearing regarding delinquent utility bills. There was no one present in the audience who wished to speak on this issue. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing and turned the item back to the Council. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION 90 -71 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,062.23 AND AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT -OFF WATER SERVICE TO THOSE ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • /levy 96 June 26, 1990 • 1.2 PUBLIC Nat TO CONSIDER A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES AT 2281 QOMMERCE BLVD. (BEN FRANKLIN). CASE #90 -915. PID #14-- 117 -24 44 0036 The City Manager explained the request. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. No merchandise of any kind shall be stored, displayed or sold on, or from the public sidewalk area (right -of -way). 2. From October 1st through November 7th of each year, pumpkins are permitted to be displayed and sold along the front portion of the store on private property only. 3. From December 1st through January 7th of each year, the parking lot on the south side of building can be used for display and sales of Christmas trees. 4. A fence enclosure shall be constructed at the southwest corner of the site in the vicinity of the existing tree and shrub sales area. All merchandise shall be displayed, sold and stored within the enclosed area. 5. Merchandise storage at the front of the store on private property shall be limited to 4 feet from the building wall to allow a 2 foot walkway for shoppers, and the sale of bagged goods shall be allowed from the door southward only. All merchandise shall be kept in a neat and orderly manner. 6. The temporary structure shall not be erected until after March 15 and shall be removed by September 1 of each year. Mr. Royer agreed with the above conditions. The Mayor opened the public hearing. There was no response. The Mayor closed the public hearing. Johnson moved and Ahrens seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #90 -72 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR HITS THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TC APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TEMPORARY SEASONAL OUTDOOR RETAIL SALES AT 2281 COMMERCE BLVD., PART OF LOT 52, LYNWOLD PARK, PID #14- 117 -24 44 0036, P i 2 CASE #90 -915 The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • 1985 • 97 June 26, 1990 There were none. T1e City Manager explained that as discussed when the new public works building was being considered, there are still repairs that need to be done on the Island Park Garage since the Park Dept. is now using the building for their equipwent storage. There are 20 items but at this time he is only asking for approval of the following that are necessities at these estimated prices: 1. New roof, insulation and roof edge 22,000 2. Exit signs over service doors to exterior 50 3. Remove dead bolts on service doors 50 4. Replace water heater and mount on wall 500 5. Replace light fixture at toilet 200 6. Regrade back of building and clean up area By City 7. Replace exterior receptacles 500 12. New toilet enclosure 1,000 13. New toilet and sink 500 14. Drinking fountain 300 • The City Manager further explained that item #1 would have to be let for bids but the remaining items could be done by obtaining quotations. Johnson moved and Jensen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION /90 -73 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE PLANS i SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO INSTALL A NEW ROOF INSULATION AND ROOF EDGE AT THE ISLAND PARK GARAGE AND TO PREPARE PLANS TO OBTAIN QUOTATIONS ON DOING CERTAIN OTHER IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ISLAND PARK GARAGE is The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.4 B$QVE$ FOR MAINTENANCE PERMIT FOR MIKE EDWARDS TO CONSTRUCT A STAaROAY TO THE LAKESHORE AT HIGHLAND BLVD. /IDLEWOOD_ROAD ON COOK'S BAY The City Manager stated that the Park Commission has recommended approval of a request from Mike Edwards (2805 Halstead Lane) , to construct a walkway and stairs at his dock site at Highland Blvd. /Idlewood on Cook's Bay. The applicant is to meet with the 1984 98 June 26, 1990 • Dock Inspector and the Park Director to determine the placement of the walkway and stairs and the condition that vegetation cutting not include cutting for the purposes of increase visibility or security. Also that the stairway conform to the Building Cc MOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Jensen to concur with the Park Commission recommendation to approve a Maintenance Permit for Mike Edwards for the installation of a walkway and stairway at his dock site at Highland Blvd. /Idlevood on Cookos say with the following stipulations: the applicant to meet with the Dock Inspector and the Park Director to determine the placement of the walkway and stairs; that veqetation cutting not include cutting for the purposes of increase visibility or security; and that the stairway conform to the Building Codes. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. The City Manager explained that Mr. Rodney Wilkens was at the Park Commission Meeting representing Mr. Gibbs and asked that a permanent chain link fence be installed between the park and the • wetlands and the park and the woods (the south and west sides of the park) to prevent the balls and children from going into those areas. He explained that a charitable organization, such as the Jaycees, would pay for the fence and installation. It was suggested that if a chain link fence were installed that it be plastic coated, either green or black, to be more aesthetically pleasing. The Park Commission recommended approval. NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by jessen to approve the installation of a chain link fence (plastic coated green or black) at the south and vest ends of Tyrone park subject to the Park Director's direction on where the fence is placed and to accept the gift of the fence and installation from the Jaycees. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.6 REQUEST TO ALTER LOCATION OF DOCK SITE - BRAD i MELVIN SOSNB The City Manager reviewed the Park & Open Space Commission Minutes of June 14, 1990, and the memo to the City Council from the Dock Inspector, dated June 25, 1990. The Park Commission recommendation was for the City Council to determine the exact location of the south edge of Waterside Commons at the 929.5 elevation and from that point the 30 foot intervals be measured to determine the exact dock location sites, and that the City 1427 99 40 June 26, 1990 Attorney draft an opinion as to how the ordinance reads as to whether the Dock Inspector has the authority to set the angle of a dock based on the current conditions of the lake and shoreline on a year by year basis. The Council discussed having a survey done to determine the exact south edge of Waters:.de Commons. The City Attorney stated that in his opinion the ordinance gives the Dock Inspector implio -d powers in the field and that he has acted within the terms of the ordinance. MOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to concur with the parks i Open space commission to determine the exact location of the south edge of waterside Commons at the 939.5 elevation and from that point the 30 foot intervals can be measured to determine the exact dock location sites. `hey further accepted the City Attorneys opinion that the Dock Inspector is acting within the terms of the dock ordinance setting the angles of docks. This item will be brought back after the locations are determined. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. • The City Manager stated that the DNR has asked the LMCD to facilitate the adoption of the shoreland standards among its member cities. There are funds available for the necessary consulting service to assist the cities in the adoption process. The City Attorney suggested that the City Manager review the determination that was made regarding a shoreland management ordinance when Pelican Point was under consideration. The Council discussed the proposal and felt that because they have only seen a Draft of the Lake Minnetonka Comprehensive Lake Management Plan that this shoreland management ordinance step would be putting the city in a situation of going ahead without having the end result. NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jessen to direct staff to look up the past review of the DNRIs shoreline management ordinance and bring it to the next meeting for discussion. The vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. 1.8 UPDATE ON 11AT,3R TREATMENT FACILITY - COMPUTER ANALYSIS The City Engineer stated that he would recommended waiting to do a computer analysis until the Council decides if they are going ahead with a water treatment plant. 1989 100 June 26, 1990 He will bring back more information at the August 21, 1990, COW meeting when Skip McCombs will also be there. No action was taken. 1.9 Recycling Coordinator, Joyce Nelson, reported that the Recycling Committee and the Earth Day Committee feels that an incentive program would help in raising our participation rates in recycling. They are proposing "Mound Recyclotto" which would work as follows: 1. Addresses would be drawn by the City Council at Council Meetings. 2. Joyce would check the address at 7:00 a.m. on the morning of Monday or Tuesday depending on the address. 3. If the household has recycling out, they would receive $50.00 in Westonka Dollars. The winner would come to the Council Meeting to receive their winnir s. If the household does not have their recycling out the prize money would go to $100 the next week and so c.. She would like to see this program start in August and it would be eligible to be funded 80% by Hennepin County. The Council discussed using Westonka Dollars and indicated they would like to limit the use of these dollars to Mound merchants only. Joyce will contact the Chamber of Commerce to see how many merchants in Mount would participate in this promotion. Ms. Nelson also reported that she would like to see the School District and all the schools participate in the recycling program. At this point their participation is minimal. The Council asked the City Manager to write a letter to the School Superintendent and the School Board asking for participation from the schools and the district so that that' lead the children by example. NOTION made by Smith, seconded by Jensen to approve the $50.00 per week recycling incentive program starting in August until December 31, 1990, with a review of the program at the end of October to see if participation has increased. The winners would receive Westonka Dollars. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. • 198q c 1. 10 LICM2 RENEw71L8 101 June 2'S, 1990 The following licenses expire June 30, 1990. The following licenses for the period July 1, 1990 to rune 30 ,1991 can be approved contingent upon all required forms, insurance, etc. being turned in: Off -Sale Be gs - Al i Alma's Supper Club Brickley's Market PDQ food Store #0292 SuperAmerica #4194 On -Sale Beer - Al i Alma's Supper Club House of Noy flub License - American Legion Pct #398 VFW Post #5113 Sunday On -Sale LigUor - VFW Post #5113 Set-Up Permit - Al i Alma's Supper Club Qn -Sale Wine - Al & Alma's Supper Club House of Noy NOTION made by Jessen, seconded by Johnson to authorise the issuance of the above licenses, contingent upon the items listed above. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. 1.11 P71YNZNT OF BILLB NOTION made by Jensen, seconded by %hrens to authorise the payment of bills as presented on - :he pre -list in the amount of $124,749.53 when funds are available. A roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Notion carried. • 1.12 3 YEAR JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COMITY FOR CDBG FMND8 The City Manager explained every three years Hennepin County must be certified by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as an urban county to continue to receive an annual entitlement grant through the CDBG program. The key element in the process is the execution of a joint Cooperation Agreement between the County and each community that wishes to participate in the program and be eligible for CDBG funds. 990 102 June 26, 1990 Jensen moved and Johnson seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #90 -70 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 1991, 1992, i 1993, CONTRACT #A00970 TO REMAIN A PARTICIPANT IN THE URBAN EZXXEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. i •i - The Council discussed the motion made and passed at the last Council Meeting. The following items were decided: 1. cost is not to exceed $3,000; 2. the designated area will be in the new addition of the building. Councilmember Johnson asked for a clarification of the smoking policy with regard to the Police interview room being included as and area designated for smoking. NOTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen (for discussion Purposes) to allow smotinq in the Police interview room and place a ventilation fan in the system at a cost of $250. 1 The Council discussed making the Police interview room conform with the 2 year total smoking ban. Councilmember Johnson called the question. The vote Was 2 in favor With Ahrens, Jensen and Jessea voting nay. Motion failed. Jensen moved and Ahrens seconded a notion to amend the original motion to include the provision that the Police interview room be smoke free at the same time as the rest of the City buildings and vehicles (2 years). Ahrens asked that this motion be amended to read that the Police intervie room smoking policy be reviewed in two years. The maker agreed. A vote on the amended amendment was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. A vote on the amended original notion was unanimously in favor. notion carried. r� � J r� L C 011 103 • June 26, 1990 WTION made by Johnson, seconded by Jensen to have the City Manager set up a committee consisting of 2 Councilmembers, 4 amployses and himself to soot at 6:00 P.N. prior to the July 24, 1990, Council meeting to review a no smoking policy to be presented by the C -ty Manager and to discuss ways of implementing a no smoking policy. The vote was unanimously in favor. notion carried. 1 a:t_ �r • ♦ a -1 - • ' .A • The following change orders were presented: CHANGE ORDER #3 - Substitute controls system other than those listed. Robert Shaw system will be installed DEDUCT $1,000 CHANGE ORDER #8 - Add smoking room inside of room #501 (8' X 9' - includes: ceiling tile, drywall, electrical, HVAC, painting, carpet i base, and hollow metal door frame with wood door /hardware) ADD $2,974 • Ahrens moved and Jessen seconded the following resolution: RESOLUTION #90 -75 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CHANGE ORDERS #3 i s - CITY HALL ADDITION AND RENOVATION PROJECT The vote was 4 in favor with Jensen voting nay. Motion carried. The City Engineer reviewed the change orders (1 -8) thus far as they related to the original contract amount. ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT 763,297 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT AFTER CHANGE ORDERS 1 -8 777,673 or $14,376 over the original contract amount. • • -4 The City Engineer presented the plans and specifications for the 1990 lift station improvement project. J11Z 104 June 26, 1990 NOTI0N made by Jansen, seconded by Johnson to approve the plans and specifications for the 1990 Lift Station Improvement Project and authorise advertisement for bids for same with bid opening July 20, 1990, at 11:00 A.M. to be considered by the City Council at the July 24, 1990, Council Meeting. The vote was unanimously in favor. lotion carried. WORMIO/ i UWELUMUR A. Planning Commission Minutes of June 11, 1990. B. 1XCD Mailing. C. May 1990 Financial Report as prepared by John Norman, Finance Director. D. Resolution from the Cities of Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach regarding their positions on LMCD Long Term Management Plan. E. Memo dr.ted June 13, 1990, from the Westonka Chamber of Commerce re: policy statement on itinerant merchants. F. Although wA agreed not to have a COW meeting in July, we • would like to request a special meeting in July to have the Downtown Study presented at a joint meeting of the City Council, Planning Commission and the Economic Development Commission. The suggested dates are either July 16 or July 17 in the evening. The Council discussed dates and asked the July 31 or August 7 be chosen for the joint meeting. The City Manager will get back to them on which date. G. Park Commission Minutes of June 14, 1990. H. Additional comments from the City of Orono regarding the T14CD 25 Year Comprehensive Plan. NOTION made by Ahrens, seconded by smith to` adjourn at 10:00 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried. Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager Fran Clark, CMC, City Clerk • 1193 PLANNING REPORT TO: Planning Commission and Staff ��,/� FROM: Mark Koegler, City Planner ICY DATE: July 2, 1990 SUBJECT: Sign Variance APPLICANT: Frank Boese, Westonka Foods CASE NUMBER: 90 -924 VHS FILE NUMBER: 90- 310- A23 -ZO • LOCATION: 5229 Shoreline Boulevard EXISTING ZONING: Central Business (B -1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial BACKGROUND: kestonka Foods is proposing to change its name and signage along the front of the building. They are seeking a 20 square foot sign variance from the requirements of tie Mound Code of Ordinances. In the 3 -1 zone, the code permits wall signs up to a maximum of 175 square feet in area with each individual sign not exceeding 100 square feet. The new Westonka sign will contain the words "Jubilee Foods" in lighted, white lettering. The lettering will be attached to a band of five colors that will stair step up the building wall, at,ve the door and window area. The total area of the sign is approximately 120 square feet resulting in the requested 20 foot variance. COMMENT: The applicant has identified that he is proposiny to use the standard Jubilee Foods sign. The standard sign combined with the existing IGA sign appears to be under the maximum 115 square foot of sign area allowed by the code. The only issue is the size of the single sign which exceeds the ordinance threshold by 20 square feet. Since this margin is a small figure and since the • ouilding contains a long front wall area, the 120 square foot sign seems to be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 'tt 3030 Harbor Lone Norrn Bldg ii. Suet• 104 Minneapolis. MN. 55417 -2175 412/553 -1950 Yestonka Foods Planning Report July 2, 1990 Page two RECQMNENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the 20 square foot sigi variance for Jubilee Foods. NOTE: This report was prepared based on preliminary information available as of July 2, 1990. If the details of the proposed sign change prior to the Planning Commission meeting, a change in the recommendation may also be in order. if any changes occur, Peggy will bring them to the attention of the Commission at the meeting. IIESTONKA.P51 • lqqq� 3241 .� +, JUN 2 ? , $9 0 Case PART 11 No. C I TY OF PKM0 Date Filed Fee 1550_0 _ VARIANCE APPLICATION PLANNING R ZONING COMMISSION (Please type or print the following information.) Address of Subject Property_ VV Zz y — sin o� Nom ��►D�_ �c�.o�,�►. tJ Block _ 1 Lot � uN `Y Addition 5 PID No. Owner's Name �Y Q S- lQ-' m P` ti Day Phone `� Owner's Address - - Applicant's Name (if other than owner)___ -__ �tac u� Address �1� \a, Day Phone �" F oaeS . Existing use of Property:- roperty : - � Zoning District 6-_1 _ Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? de s no If yes. list dates) of application. action taken, and provide resolution number (s) (Copies of previous resolutions must accompany this application.) I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and ac- curate. 1 consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posts g, maintaining ana removing such notices as may be required by law. Date Applicant's Signature FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Planning Commission Recommendation_ - _- _--- _ - - - -- — - - - ---- _- • Counc i I Action:_ - - -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - ---- - --- -- — Resolution No._ ----- - - - - -- - - --- -- - Oate 111,� APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT CITY OF MOUND NAME OF APPLICANT `ar L O eS,e PHONE NO.4j2,-? ADDRESS 2i 5 k &Aei_ l aki , 000d Street Number City Zip BUILDING OWNER mY ( a (If other than applicand Name CONTRACTOR ) I Nul Addre Name �,,p Address SIGN LOCATION 5229 h o rel l ne Dc i v �. _ LOT �,20 J Z �c� BLOCK ADDITION ALLOWABLE SIGNAGE @ _ 100 Square Footage WALL AREA BY Ft. = TOTAL ZONING DISTRICT EXISTING SIGNAGE NUMBER OF SIGN SQ. FOOTAGE OF SIGN DESCRIBE SIGN (Materials, etc.) HEIGHT OF SIGN ,rTh r_ �Yi L K arin c ryi tom / rr i Colo SIGN SIZE BEING REQUESTED BY 12-0 SQ. FT. LENGTH OF TIME SEASONAL SIGN TO BE ERECTED: A. M . PLEASE DESCRIBE REQUEST AND REASON FOR REQUEST: Is sign for a communi �-) n tion 55.38? If additional information is attached, please submit 81" X 11" maximum sized drawings. Applicant's Signature Date submitted Recommendation: APPROVED: Building Official ILLUMINATED: YES �JiL b TYPE OF SIGN: WALL MOUNT x FREE STANDING PORTABLE OTHER r. 1. 1 ` I 11 168 R 9/85 i oll AO -.rye 0� i7 -� - ... Ir r V 1yu w�� � ..e � • � � • ' g I L K V 1•t s. s.. 0 7 21 22 _ i (11 _ 19 1 _ ivo i„ t s. vN L YNW000 • -,p .. ,?s Q k > < ' 70.373 - 70 v '0 } S p • , .. . 7 �± v . s d. 7 e 9 10- 11 12 13' 16' 17' ld`I_ 2 -, BLVD c — 24 23 2 3 _ _ .... r f 7 s. 7 d S 4 3 2 1 11 IC f 3st0 �1. • ~ �ZZ 3 , `SYLVAN _ a ri • 6 N 1: s - -� I �eS .�_/, c . b - ii5 I p� E rr! t n i • Li .1 • 33 \�� • �`� e� 10 15 1, 1S �' , V to 3 W 32 _ _ )t I 2'IQ.1 - - - - w v r� ,t q 1 I 1 lad 1!� 1 t1 0 a l If 4 3 J �, ' 31 3 z,. y l •r y _ I I Qt 30 �- -~ —� • 33 33 3h 35 �. W to ! � tt� 27 M - 7 ` v ~ 2G -J p �' 1 __ - 7 2d ` 1111. ._ EDEN s � f•. �+ l o) S)331 241 SHI 3zj�9 �:_ s ti s1 eil;l� al �'��+��<<� �1 Ff r _ �1 3' � 1. r,'�.Z '., •',,. -- is , N! lay' N •.'\ 17 Q _ sr s 14 .� -� •�', _ 1 L'h1) K =1' 3o _ L tG +2 '. s t t 2 i 3 17 41 $ If 4V s -- - - —MAN WOOD 2U ZG B9 4 A NOTE 5 ^ All raid Hato ok,ea CoftNo.111 ` SM"" M f- 13 token hole ro.ft ` f/1 * i '71 1 i�t 1 ,loa. P►a;f f No.4904 `7 E `.:. [_ � 5 J 34 V • • . RESOLUTION NO. 90- July 10, 1990 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #87 -16 WHICH DESIGNATES A NO PARKING ZONES WHEREAS, Chapter VII of the Mound Code provides that the City Council ray from time to time, by resolution, establish rules and regulations relating to the use of streets within the City, and WHEREAS, in 1987 the City Council adopted Resolution #87 -16, entitled "Resolution Designating No Parking Zones "; and WHEREAS, in that resolution there is no parking, no stopping and no standing zones on the "South side of Leslie Road from Brighton Blvd. to Manchester Road; and WHEREAS, some of the residents of Leslie Road which abutts Swenson Park have requested a change in the no parking zone from the south side of that road to the north side of the road because their driveways are being blocked by ball players using Swenson Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of . the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby amends Resolution #87 -16, to read as follows " #21. North Side :.)f Leslie Road from Brighton Blvd. to Manchester Road." 0 i • C ITY �t �c �� ��t �:� � %E;- Ca_ac V �, , .. , June 21, 1990 TO: JIM FACKL.ER, PARKS DIRECTOR LEN HARRELL, POLICE CHIE FROM: D SH E UKLE, CIT7 MANAGER RE: LETTER DATED MAY 30, 1990, FROM NEIGHBORS OF SNENSON PARK On June 12th I received the attached letter with regard to complaints about the Swenson Park area. The letter was signed by Mr. and Mrs. Ted Stallman, Mr. and Mrs. Doug Anderson and Mr. George Larson, all on the Leslie Road area by Swenson Park. Mr. Anderson contacted me in mid to late May regarding the park and some of r.1. a complaints that he had. He finally wrote the .letter on May 300 and I received it last week. I apologize for not getting this to you sooner. I would like each of you to review his complaints and then meet with me jointly to see if the,•e is anything that can be done to make the area more safe and less congested. Please try to meet with me early in the week of June 25th. ES:ls attachment • • ;W01 1 • Neighbors of Swenson Park 4912 Leslie Road Mound, MN 55364 472 -5429 521 -8519 Doug Anderson at work May 30, 1990 Mr Ed Shuckle, City Manager REC'0 JUN 12 1990 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Shuckle: We, the undersigned, are all citizens of Mound, with residences on Leslie Road, across from Swenson Park. Over the past few years, problems with the management and upkeep of the park have increased in intensity and now requires immediate remedial action. Douglas Anderson was on the Park Commission at the time that Island Park Playground, now Swenson Park, was developed. Much of the discussion at the time centered around the role of the park • in the community. Because of the addition of the tennis courts, it was determined that this area would ultimately be more than a traditional neighborhood playground, but would not have the draw of a citywide park such as Mound Bay and the Depot. It was decided that parking for twelve to fifteen cars would be sufficient to handle the number of people projected to be using the tennis courts and other facilities at any ore time. It is interesting to note, that the softball diamond was mentioned only in passing when considering the issue of parking spaces. The hallmark of the playground was to be the tennis courts. Now, more than twelve years after the completion of the park, the use iF dramatically different than originally intended. This is to expected, given changes in population trends and the gene.:l interests of the public. The softball field that was intended for pick -up games on a Sunday afternoon, now plays host to as many as two league sanctioned games per evening. Cars are parked anywhere there is space, including on the lawns of both the park and residences of the area, in driveways and in violation of posted signs. Traffic is brought to a standstill as a two lane street with parking on one side, is reduced to one lane for the entire length of Leslie • Road. Ingress to and egress from driveways is nearly impossible. "OZ Our cars have been hit with errant balls, as have at least two homeowners. In short, we have a situation out of control. • As mentioned earlier, we understand that use patterns of any facility can change, and we are not suggesting that Swenson Park no longer be used for league gaYres, even though it was not designed for such a use. We are requesting that action be taken, both short term and long term, that will reduce some of the inconvenience we, as residents, are subjected to, make the area safer for both residents and users of the park facilities, and, hopefully, not break an already strained, municipal budget. For the short term, we request that the Mound Police Department be directed to make more drive bys of the park to assure compliance with parking ordinances already on the books. This will go far in reducing the congestion in the area. Also, we urge the liaison between the city and the sanctioning leagues to remind the participants in games at Swenson Park to use a little courtesy and common sense when it comes to parking in driveways and on lawns. Also, they should be informed of the stricter enforcement of parking ordinances. When two games are scheduled, there is a potential for forty cars trying to find parking spaces. (10 cars from each of the two teams playing, plus ten cars from each of the two teams waiting to play.) This doesn't include coaches and spectators. It is obvious that a park designed with only 15 parking spaces cannot possibly handle 40 cars. 0 Because schedules are set and playing would be unreasonable to request that at this facility be reduced immediat it must be considered. We recommend, league play next year, no more than evening. time allocated, we feel it the number of games played ely, but in the long term, when scheduling games for one game be scheduled per Second, we request that the "No Parking" signs be moved from the south side of Leslie Road to the nort' side. This will help in two ways. The cars parked on the south aide will act as a screen to protect our vehicles, legally parked on our property, from damage, limiting the damage to those vehicles that are involved in the activities of the park. Moving the signs will also provide more parking for eight more cars because there are no driveways on that side of the street. We know that members of the council and police department have, at one time or another, played in league competition at Swenson Park, and we are sure they have seen first hand the problems and losses of temper by residents as a result of the parking situation around this facility. It is our hope that these corrective actions will be seen as a compromise that is workable for both the residents of, and the visitors to, the area. X003 Parking, however, is only one problem with this facility. It • seems that since the drought, no care has been taken t(. restore the beauty of the area. The residents of Leslie Road have gone to great expense to seed, sod and otherwise restore their lawns. Weed free lawns will never be possible, however, because the city is growing a bumper crop of dandelions right across the street. While we are aware of budget restrictions, we feel the taxpayers of the city would be willing to spring for a couple cans of Weed- B -Gon. We were careful to recommend only solutions we feel would not further strain an already tight budget. Most things suggested are already a part of the normal duties and budgets of city officials, staff and departments. Mr. Shuckle, I would appreciate it if you would direct these issues to the departments and commissions responsible for there consideration and action. If attendance by one of our group at a council, park or planning commission meeting is warranted, please let me know. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Ted and Cheryl Stallman 491 slie Road Doug a3 Joy ,Anderson 491 Z 'te George Larson 4906 Leslie Road J" � )X 1� Atey c IT) NI L',\I July 2, 1990 TO: MAYOR CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK RE: SUBCONTRACTING OF SATURDAY AND SUNDAY BUS SERVICE I spoke with the MTC last week about the proposed subcontracting of Saturday and Sunday bus service on MTC Route 51 serving Minnetonka, Wayzata, Orono, Mound, Navarre and Spring Park. The reason they are proposing this is the high subsidy level • they are paying to keep the route (over $2.45 per passenger). The subsidy levels per passenger on this route are as follows: Route 51 - Saturday - $5.69 /per passenger Sunday - $4.63 /per passenger Weekdays - $3.61 /per passenger Route 75 - Express - $1.47 /per passenger It boils down to low ridership on the weekends. The route is the one that runs from Mound to Ridgedale and back. They would continue to run the 51 route from Minneapolis to Ridgedale on Saturday and Sunday, but from Ridgedale to Mound it would be subcontracted out to a hus service that can operate at lower costs than the MTC. I suppose if they do not find a bus service that ..ants this route i+_ could be eliminated somewhere down the line. That is not being proposed at this time. 0 ao s RECD JUN 2 510 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Wednesday, Juiy 25, 1990 at 7 :30 p.m. A public hearing will be held before the Metropolitan Transit Commission on Wednesday, July 25, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. in the MTC Commission Chambers, 560 6th Ave. No., Minneapolis, for the purpose of receiving public comment on the proposed discontinuance of week -day bus service on MTC Route 36 serving Minnetonka, Edina and St. Louis Park and for the proposed subcontracting of Saturday do Sunday bus service on MTC Route 51 serving Minnetonka, Wayzata, Orono, Mound, Navarre and Spring Park. • e. July 10, 1990 RESOLUTIOM 110. 90- 0 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSAL FROM CONTZL FOR THE CZWTREZ TELEPHONE BYSTEK FOR THE CITY OF SOUND WHEREAS, the current phone system being used in city facilities has been in use since 1974 and is obsolete; and WHEREAS, a Committee was set up to analyze needs and study various systems; and WHEREAS, in 1989 the Committee met with 5 vendors and looked at different systems and received proposals from 3 vendors ranging from $16,000 to $20,500; and WHEREAS, since approval of the City Hall addition and renovation, the staff felt it necessary to speed up the analysis of the telephone system so that a system would be in place when the addition and subsequent remodeling is completed; and WHEREAS, after careful analysis of systems available, it appears that Contel's Centrex system offers a number of advantages to the City over key systems; and WHEREAS, the Staff is recommending the attached proposal from Contel (Centrex System), marked Exhibit A, be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby approve the attached proposal (Exhibit A) for a new telephone system (Centrex) as outlined from Contel for city facilities. Further, that since this is a capital expenditure, a "fixed asset ", it shall be paid for out of the City Capital Improvement Debt Service Fund. • Aeo7 I1 CIT of N I(A 7'ND July 5, 1990 TO: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR Si-rj RE: PHONE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT For some time, we have been analyzing the telephone system for City Hall and other municipal facilities. About one year ago a Committee consisting of several employees began studying various telephone systems to eventually replace the existi.ig telephone system. • The current system is obsolete and has had numerous repair problems in recent: years. Upon approval of the City Hall addition and remodeling project staff felt it was necessary to speed up the analysis of the telephone systems so that a system could be in place when the addition to City Hall would be completed and subsequent completion of the remodelin.,• phase. CURRENT SYSTEM The City of Mound has had the same phone system since 1974. They are keypunch style phones manufactured by Stromberg- Carlson. The phones are obsolete and have movable parts which has led to many repair calls. The features of the current phones are limited, some of the deficiencies are: 1. Intercom path - cannot use intercom without taking up entire intercom path within the system. 2. No interconnection between city departments. 3. No privacy on calls - Line 1 on your phone is line one on all phones. • 1 ta00 a 4. Lines are limited in number for incoming calls (outgoing calls use same lines). We get many . complaints from residents saying they get a busy signal. 5. Routing of calls can be confusing - no display of routing, ring back features. I think we can all agree that there is a great need for a better phone system for the entire city. The committee met various times during 1989 to assess our phone needs and meet with various vendors. We talked with the following companies: Contel - Centrex (single line sets) Communications World - Toshiba Strata DK A T i T - Merlin II Executone - SRX Telephone Specialists - Premier ESP The Contel Centrex system was looked at and did not look attractive because the single line sets were somewhat limited in their capabilities. The other key system phone units were all impressive and basically could do all of what we were looking for and more. We received proposals from three of the vendors (before the City Hall expansion was approved) ranging from $16,000 to $20,250. We put the phone system search on hold once the City Hall expansion was moving forward. It made sense to incorporate the expansion area into the phone system search. Key System - A phone system where each public works, etc.) has a phone system "b lines for that location enter. All phone that "box ". The features offered on key but interconnection between facilities is (off - premise extensions). location (city hall, ox" where all business sets are connected to systems are excellent limited and expensive Centrex System - This phone system uses the local phone company central office as the phone system "box ". There are no separate boxes at each city location. In effect, all locations within the city are within the same phone system. • 2 Aoo1 1990 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY Contel came out to make an updated presentation regarding Centrex and the Northern Telecom Meridian Business sets used with Centrex. Linda Strong and ? went out to see the business sets and Centrex in use. The business sets have most of the capabilities of a key system ani Centrex offers a number of advantages over key systems. The following are some of the advantages that the Contel Centrex System has to offer: 1. Unlimited intercom paths within entire city facilities. 2. Calls can be transferred to any phones located within the city (the person calling can be taken care of with one call instead of given numbers to other city departments). 3. The only equipment onsite are phone sets - no other equipment necessary. 4. Power failure will not impact phones since Centrex has no electrical requirement. 5. Direct -In -Dial feature - Each phone set is actually assigned a separate telephone number (this can eliminate time spent by receptionists that they could use to perform other duties). 6. Phone will not become easily obsolete (Centrex is software driven and new updates can be programmed i•:to existing phone sets). 7. City can save on business line trunks by pooling lines for the city locations (for example, instead of using 6 lines for police, 6 lines for city hall, 4 lines for public works, 1 line for liquor store, etc., 10 business lines shared by all should be sufficient under Centrex). 8. One vendor (Contel - locally based) will be responsible for ali lines and equipment. IFW-1 A 111 *4 To) 1X4.1 aj.T*3YEtGIO) 1 , OV The proposal from Contel includes - ill City Offices except the Fire Department. The Fire Department needs have to be analyzed and would be ideal to incorporate into Centrex in the future. Contel has given us a good discount on the list price for the phone sets. They have also offered *o allow us to lease the sets for six months and give us 100% credit off the purchase price of the sets when the sets are purchased. This is important because 3 42 to /D it is hard to tell which of the 4 types of business sets are best suited for our use. If after six months we want to switch to a number of different sets, Contel would exchange the new sets for us at that time. Therefore, it is the recommendation of the employees' committee that a new telephone system is rem as we enter the new City Hall facility. In addition, the system would be incorporated into other city facilities as mentioned above. Furthermore, it is the Committee's recommend: on that the attached proposal as outlined from Contel be approved by the City Council. It should be noted that the system, since it is a capital expenditure, a "fixed asset ", be paid for out of the City Capital Improvement Debt Service Fund. I would like to thank the members of the Phone Committee for their time and involvement into recommending this phone system. The members of the Committee are: Linda Strong, Receptionist; Joyce Nelson, Public Works Secretary; Shirley Hawks, Police Secretary; and Fran Clark, City Clerk. I am confident that the Contel Centrex system will be an excellent asset for the City now and into the future. The Centrex system will give the City excellent interconnection between departments and improved service to the community. • X011 C = == Telephone 31 Operaiions June 1990 Mr. John Norman Finance Directory City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound. MN 55164 Dear John: Contel Business Systems. Inc. is pleased to pro\�ide the enclosed proposal for the City of Mound. Contel has been the local telephone company servicing the Mound area for over 20 years. Durine these years. Contel has shown our commitment to provide our customers \kith state of the art tcchnok)gy back with • local service to provide quick response time. Those of us at Contel share a commitment to excellence in providing you, the customer. with quality service and technoloev. The proposed service is Contel's Digltal Centrex Service. This service is sophisticated. efficient and inexpensive. Because the servi.c are Jisital. they represent the most advanced technology available. This is made possible by the powerful computers operating in our telephone compam's central offices. These computers connect you to the telecommunications network and allow you to share in the sophisticated communication service they offer. John. it after reviewing this proposal you have any questions or would like to finalise with Centrex, please contact me at 681 -2566. Sincerely. ies M. Costcllo Senior Sales Rcpresentatise JM(':cw •L013 • C� • elecommumcattons..tio ntodent compa►tt' can operate uitlJout it. }et telecommunications can be one of Me most castle and inefciettt areas of business. Some extecuta yes sae dxt t/x-v seen: to 4vnd as nuicb time op t/Je purcImue, installation and nuainteruance of a pritnte slstem as dxv do on nu their business. Fortuttateh' dwre is an app o acb to business teleccomntuuicatiotts dhat is simple, flexible, cos7- effectit+e, jet ftd1v featured AM it is offered bt Contel, t/w people uho hruce pritided i+otl with dependable contnuanceulolts se►7ice for tcears. Contel Centrex is often referred to as central office - based business sen ices. it is made pa.Nible bt- the pouce►ful computers operating at dw telepl nie contpa►tr's central offices These computers connect 1'011 to the telecommunications netuY)rk at td allou twit to share in the sop!_)a cor►n►ttl►ticctio►ts so7xes t /ki- offer Here Are The Facts Contel Centrex sere ices are sophisticated, efficient and inexpensWe Because the .services are digital, then represent the most xh an, ed technolo n a\ ailahle • Contel Centre.- i; maintained !n• the telephone con►p(tlti (at t1K' centr(il (f c , tlx�rcfore tlrerz� is ►to nec'cl to ptrrdxtK' e\pe►t�hv, con►plicctted (it" Ica 'S to lx' ntstallc�d lY)!ll'CO1)Jplt)tl' 7ZkTV (rc' nu C011C076 fl (x)l'.yxac', jx)IIe ColtJ711►q)ttolt, 111011110 STSt(7)L1 U/" elnplowv fr'alnhll )rxrr tek�)lx)1tc' COM/'XIltr bathe, e t ill thing at lts cosh - al (Va(l • Contel CE-►ttrev is cugomi:ed to ft hour unkpie busint -cs rapiirente?z. you pert for onit those sen7ces ticou use. • Contel Coiner operates of cer a aide range of voice and data equipmew, inchuling common touch - tone and rotate dial telephones. • Contel Ce?ttner can be added to man existing prit'cue sl stems for upgraded son-ices itwhott abandoning current equipmewt huvsPnenl,s. Easv to Understand Learning the basics of Contel Centrex is easy Most people understand the features the\ will use after a quick review of the operating material Easy to Maintain The operatik,n and maintenance of the complicated equipment remairLs at the telephone company site. «here it is monitored 4 hours a day, scven da% a week Ease to Install tirnce installing Contel Centrex requires u) little time and on -site equil)nu•nt, it can he in service within a matter of \\eeks, not months Easy to Change C(mtel Centrex is designed to evolve e:1.1lik and Oco nek :Ls hour compare s telCO )IIununcrauuns needs change it's 11MR: hrg N )f ao)y City of Mound 0 table of Contents Centrex Benefits II. Centrex Features III. Investment Summary It! Warrant• Service and Maintenance V, Equipment Description • • Ro1S C _ L CENTREX SERVICE BENEFITS Centrex Digital Service is not a system you buy. but a group of senOces you can choose to create a phone system ideally suited to your business. Benefits of Centrex include: - No equipment to buy or maintain, therefore no investment. - No equipment to be damaged or stolen. - No equipment at the customer location. no fluor space required. - Service tailored to your needs. - Add or drop lines as needed. - Fast responsive service. - Tie geographically dispersed locations together. - Monitored 24 hours a day. reliable, no charges. - Latest in technology, no update costs. - No power requirements. - Unaffected by power outages. - Directed inward dialing. allowing outside calls to come directly to your desk. Any single line rouchcone telephone can be used with Centrex Service. Contel offers a variety of Northern Telecom Unity single or multi -line analog or digital telephones that can be rented or purchased. Aa14 CO NT EL CALL PICKUP Allows you to answer any ringing phone in your office. Su. your customers don't get a busy signal. they get through. C,kLL FORWARDING ALL CALLS Allows you to receive calls wherever you are. It keeps you in touch with business. as you conduct business. CALL FORWARDING BUSY Allows you to have calls diverted to another station when you are on the telephone. CAL 1_ FORWARDING NO ANSWER Allows you to have calls diverted to another station when you are away from your telephone for a short time. L >1>0:L4311E Lets you put a caller on hold. That give you private. and time to solve problems. while customers are crt the phone. THREE -WAY CALLING Adds a third part}' to phone conversations. So. you can hold meetings. sole problems, and close sales. INTERCOM Gives you access to everyone in your company... fast. You simply dial a two or three digit number: CALL TRANSFER Allows you to transfer calls to ether extensions so customers art: alw put in touch with the right person. CALL WAITING .7 • Doubles your phone capaciry' When you're already on your phone and someone • tried to reach you ... they "Ill. xo�l c� M � c SPEED CALLING Reduces important phone numbers to one or two digit". Its ideal for frequently called customers and suppliers. RING AGAIN Allows you to be notified when a busy extension or busy outgoing line is a%ailable. CALL PARK Allows you to hold a call while freeing -up your telephone. You can retrie%er the "held" call from any telephone. CONSULTATION HOLD Allows you to put a call on hold. call a third part and consult pri\atrh, then return to the original call. C7 • •?D 19 City of Mound Investment Summan lei Quantity n t Lst Price Fa, Discount Pnce Ea Rental Pace 21 Mi009 5264.00 5171.00 S5.75 mo. 10 M5209 5596.00 5387.00 S0.25 m o. 3 M5112 5504.00 5327.00 S11 2S aw, 1 M536 add on 51.006.00 S654.t10 S-` 'i 'mto. M518 add on $453.00 S294.00 SU.75 moo. 3 Umn Ill 5117.00 576.00 55.50 mco. Total list price $1 5.279.00 Less 6 month rental $2 Less municipal discount $3,296- In place purchase price $9.912.00 Installation charges $1.300.00 Total one time charge $11.212.00 • �,�,1 Recurring Su_ mman *4` Centrex Lines $6� These numbers are based on the ciry using 10 businesses to serve the Centrex group. One time facility administration charge $397.00 *This tariff rate does not include trunking and can vary by the type of telephone to be used. 0 zoll C EL 0 WARRANTY Contel warrants all equipment supplied within the outline of this proposal to be free of defects in material and workmanship for a period of 365 days from date of system cutover into service. Contel warrants that the equipment, when installed. will demonstrate in a satisfactory manner the features and capabilities outlined in this proposal. Contel will make all necessary equipment adjustments. repairs and secure part(s) replacements. without additional charges to maintain equipment in working order. for the duration of the warranty period. The following conditions are not covered under the warranty period: (1) Usage other than intended (?) Unauthorized access (3) Unauthorized modifications (4) Willful or accidental damage to equipment or acts of God 0 SERVICE AND AAINTEN.ANCE SERVICE Contel will provide maintenance service to keep the equipment described in this proposal in working order for a period of 365 days from date of cuto%er into service at no extra charge. RESPONSE 'HME Contel will provide Minor Repair Service on the average within 24 hours and Emergenc} Repair Service on the average wI'thin 4 hours of reported failure to Contel's repair service. IMPORIAN NUMBERS For repair service call 472-889() For additions or changes to your system call 681 -2599 TRAI N11G Complete training is provided by our Customer Service Advisor for v()u and your staff at no charge. .Zato 42021 wwmm1� S r C c c tl r communications. In the unlikeh event that a problem occurs, calls and service are routed through another s\ In addition to equipment backup, the central office also maintains emergeno power to keep phcmes ringing even when the local power is out This built -in redundiancv is one example of why a central off ice -batted s�-stem is the intelligent choice for your business telecommunications heeds \,Xbat if demands change? What if better and faster methods are developed for handling voice and data needs? Will %ou be "stuck" with equipment that no longer approaches state-of-the art? Conte) Centrex ends the worn of obsolete equipment. Improvements in digital communications became pan of the central office system. Your service improves as the central office improves. • • • • • h'Irxi>;:.c Sophistication People often have wrong preference negarding features, color and style. Within a single office, personal choice; in telephones can range from the simplicity of the touch -tone phone to more sophisticated models. Most primate televy munications systems limit the choice of phones. Contel Centrex -Aers flexible options in phone models :r ' features for each person, job or environment. Contel Centrex gives you choices. Expandable Sophistication A sophisticated telecommunications system grown with a compan } •, line b% line, phone by phone, feature by feature. The executive should decide when to expand the s%- and Mien to cut back. The ser%ices of Contel Centrex can change to meet the evoking and sectional demands of the mcxdern business. OP22 • i � C mpanies equipped with a private system can ecsiic add features offered with Conte[ Centrex without purchasing additional equipmeru. Contel Centrex grow-, with the customer. Feature Sophistication An advanced telecommunications service should allow feature customizing. And the choice of features should be from a very large menu. Contel Centrex is feature -rich, serving the nerds of businesses for voice and data services "a [a cane." The customer selects from hundreds of features ranging from the very basic to the highly refined Contel Centrex offers just what is needy 1. ,7 • E Z • • • Systems Comparison. Contel Centrex is the choice for business executives wlio cant: To have the latest in telecommunications technology. The advanced switching equipment at the central office is c instantly being upgraded to provide the latest in telephone services. With pr* are systems the equipment may become outdated or the capacity surpassed by growth, requiring costly changes or replacement. To save valuable office space. All of the bulky equipment is located at the central office. With pruate systems the equipment consumes office space and often demands special environmental requirements and power systems. To save money. Since the equipment is located at the telephone company central office, savings are easily realized on training, insurance and utility bills. With pruate systems there are often "hidden" expenses that are all -but- forgotten until after the system is in place. To avoid service interruptions. A backup power supple at the central office keeps the equipment up and running even during power failures. With pruate sisters businesses must purchase a special track -up power supple to prevent power loss downtime. To forget repair bills and downtime. Since the main equipment is maintained and serviced at the central office, telephone company personnel can correct problems even before a customer notices a disruption. With pruate sweets business executives may well experience delays and downtime. When a problem arises, there is often an annoying wait for parts and repairs. To gradually add to their system. With Contel Centrex, lines and services can be added when desired, even one at a time if necessary. With prit ate systems flexibility for growth is constrained by the switching capacity, circuit design, contractual specifications and floor space. To use a wide variety of voice terminals. Thanks to the flexibility of central office business services, business executives can choose the telephones that meet their exacting needs and those of everyone else in the company. One of those choices can be a familiar basis phone that is inexpensive to buy and simple to use With private systems frequently there is little choice regarding the telephone that can be used Often these phones are complicated and quite expensive to buy and maintain. 4o62y July 5, 1990 ( ;I r (A N K A , NI M NNE�CJA 5;364 TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER RE: UPDATE ON CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING LOTS The City Council took action on May 8, 1990, directing the Staff to advise the owner of Dakota Rail that the City was not interested in purchasing the Central Business District parking lots owned by Dakota Rail at a price of $250.000. The City Council also directed that a petition requesting a public improvement under Section 429 and 459 of Minnesota Statutes be given to owners of property in the CBD District for their signature. Following that meeting, I sent out the attached memorandum dated May 30, 1990, along with a petition for each owner to sign. 26 memorandums and petitions were mailed on May 30th to all CBD owners. The memo dated June 4, 1990, indicates that the petitions should be returned on or before Friday, June 22, 1990. Of the 26 owners, only 7 responded, 5 were in the affirmative, 2 were against. I am concerned that the owners of the Central Business District properties do not understand the ramifications of not acquiring these properties for parking purposes. I have had at least two telephone conversations with Elli Mills, President of Dakota Rail, regarding his intention to fence off these areas. You may have noticed already that Mr. Mills has placed "For Sale" signs on the properties as well as taken spray paint and marked off the areas that he believes are part of his property. He intends to chain the areas off after September 15, 1990, which is the final date of the current lease that the City and the Central Business District have with Dakota Rail. At this point, I am wondering if I should try to make further contact with the remaining 19 property owners who have not indicated their position on this matter. Do you think I should try to make telephone contact or written contact with them? I am of the opinion that until Mr. Mills puts up fencing and /or chains blocking the pat.ing lots off for use by the public, the owners are not going to really realize what is happening. Should I be making further contact with the owners? Should we be looking at • improving the lot along Auditor's Road behind the House of Moy so 2L0V Page 2 Mayor i City Council July 5, 1990 that parking could be shifted to this lot? Should other property in downtown Mound be acquired for parking purposes? These are just some of the questions that I have in my mind with regard to this issue. I would like you to think about this for Tueslay evening so we can discuss it and to advise me as to whether you believe we should continue to see if we can secure more signatures for the petition or because we've had a lack of response to the petit' 'n, that maybe we are wasting our time. FJS: fc 0 2 "At 11 June 4, 1990 c 'IT) " of N K A "NI • ?: MA "A ��,- TO: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER RE: DAKOTA RAIL - PARKING FACILITIES MEMO ADDENDUM In the memo dated May 30, 1990 to all CBD property owners, regarding the possible acquisition of Dakota Rail property for parking facilities, the date to return your petition was inadvertently omitted. Please return your survey on or before Friday, June 22, 1990 Thank you for your interest in the downtown parking issue. ES :ls cc: Curt Pearson, City Attorney John Norman, Finance Director • • 202.0) AL )f N R A , 1 � N. MINNESOFA AO , S 2 cc May 30, 1990 TO: CENTRAL. BUSINESS DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS FROM: ED SHUKLE, CITY MANAGER ' RE: DAKOTA RAIL — AUTOMOBILE PARKING FACILITIES Some of you are aware of the discussions we have had over the last year regarding the possible acquisition of parking lots from Dakota Rail. The most recent communication I have to you on this subject was a memo dated May 3, 1990, at which time I informed you as to the status -.f the issue and that the City Council was meeting on May 8, 1990 to discuss the purchase price and a Possible assessment program in conjunction with the Central Business District property owners. • At the May 8th Council meeting, the city attorney stated that there are several issues to be determined: 1. Is it desirous to acquire land for parking in the Central Business District? 2. Who should pay the cost of said lane:'' 3• Mould it be to the property owners advantage to acquire the lands in their own name and to have fee title to the property? 4. Are the property owners in the CBD who need parking, willing to pay the costs of acquiring land? The city attorney suggested that the property owners need to petition the City Council for a public improvement under Minnesota Statutes Chapters 429 and 459• After receipt of the petition, the city attorney would recommend that a professional engineer and /or planner be retained to prepare a feasibility report. This report would require that some instruction be given as to how the City and benefited property owners propose to pay for the improvements. The City Council then took action by directing the city staff to advise the owner of Dakota Rail that the City of Mound is not interested in the property at the price of $250,000. Council also directed staff to prepare a petition requesting a public improvement per sections 429 and 459 of the Minnesota Statutes that would be given to the owners of the . property in the Central Business District for their signature. J?06%9 Memo to CBD Property Owners May 30, 1990 Therefore, I have enclosed a petition to be executed by ALL OWNERS of properties in the Central Business District. There is no commitment in this petition as to the amount of money which will be expended or the cost of the improvements. The petition is therefore not location specific, but relates to the Central Business District. Each owner, if they are in support of the parking improvements, will sign a separate petition. If all 26 sign the petition, I should have 26 petitions by the due date. Based upon the return of the petitions, we should be able to determine if there is sufficient interest in an acquisition of the parking facilities. Then, we can proceed under a special assessment formula based upon Minnesota Statute Section 459.14, Subd. 3, which reads in part as follows: "If special assessments have been or will be levied in an amount of not less than 50% of the amount of such bonds...." Please understand that chapters 429 and 459 of Minnesota Statutes are referring to special assessment. to be paid by the property owners. • The City of Mound believes that an acquisition of this property . is important to the current and future parking needs of the City of Mound in its downtown area. However, the City is willing to go forward on this project ONLY if CBD property owners are willing to participate in a special assessment program per Minnesota Statutes chapters 429 and 459. If you are in agreement with the petition that is enclosed, please sign it and indicate the other pertinent information that is requested. Upon receipt of the petition, we will notify you as to the next step in the process. I would like the petition returned in the enclosed self addressed stamped envelope. If I do not hear from you via the petition by the above date, I will assume that you are not interested in participating in the parking facilities acquisition program. If you have any questions, please contact me. cc: Curt Pearson, City Attorney John Norman, Finance Director enc. ES:ls • z X0M 0 0 CITY OF MOUND PETITION FOR PARKING FACILITIES CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OWNER MAILING ADDRESS ADDRESS OF PROPERTY BUSINESS PHONE PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER & LEGAL DESCRIPTION NER SIGNATURE PRIN OWNER NAME 0 HOME PHONE 0 4 4 6 d s is i n of me r?� i�an municipalities June 4, 1990 Dear Chief Administrative Official: RECD JUN 5 1990 I NEED YOUR HELP NOW! 'The AMM must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the ci ties of the metropolitan area to express in a united voice this important perspective of local government.' 40 The above quote, perhaps more than any other statement, capsulizes the major conclusion of the 12 member AMM Mission and Membership Services Task Force which just completed a year long evaluation and assesment of the AMU's mission, focus and general operations. The Task Force, in ite final report, concluded that the AMM has been a very effective 'voice' and provides many benefits for the cities in the 7- county metropolitan area. However, the Task Force feels that we (The • AMM) are at a crossroads and must not rest on our laurels as the problems and challenges facing us in the 90's are likely to be even more complex and difficult than the problems of the last decade. The enclosed Task Force report contains a 'blueprint for action' which if implemented should enable the AMM to remain a reliable and relevant tool for member cities as we enter the 90 The bottom line, however, is that to follow this 'blueprint' we must hire an additional staff member which could result in a dues increase of 20 to 25 %. The current three member staff does an outstanding job but the work load has increased so dramatically in recent years that to maintain current programs and increase our effectiveness at the Legislature and to become more proactive at the metropolitan level as recommended in the report, an additional staff member is mandatory. The Board would like to implement the Task Force recommendations and have the additional person on board by early 1991 but will not do so unless there is strong membership support for such action. Hera is how your help is needed as asked for in the opening sentence of this letter: 1. Please provide copies of this letter and report to your Mayors and Councilmembers. 2031 -1- 183 university avenue east, st Maul minnesota 55101 (612) 2274008 • 2. Please place the report on your Council's Agenda for discussion and action prior to August 1, 1990. (If you would like an AMM board member to attend your council meeting when this item is discussed, please contact an AMM staff member to make the arrangements.) 3. Please inform the AMM Office by no later then August 15th. as to whether your city supports or opposes adding a staff member and the resultant dues increase. (You will be notified as to the exact amount of such increase by no later than July 6th.) 4. Please have a representative from your city attend the special Alai Membership Meeting pre - scheduled for Thursday evening, September 20th. to consider and vote on this matter. I thank you in advance for your help and thoughtful consideration of this proposal. Sincerely, 40 Larry Bakken, President Golden Valley Councilmember • -2- OR 0A a s5oc is i of metto �itan municipalities ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES REPORT OF THE 1990 MISSION AND MEMBERSHIP SERVICES TASK FORCE c: TASK FORCE MEMBERS Kevin Fratell, City Administrator, Cottage Grove, Task Force Chair Mentor "Duke" Addicks, Legislative Liaison, Minneapolis Bob Benke, Mayor, New Brighton Gary Jackson, City Manager, Coon Rapids a James D. Prosser, City Ma tiger, Richfield Marilyn. Corcoran, Mayor, Dayton Nancy Jorgenson, Councilmember, Fridley Tom Spies, Councilmember, Bloomington Katherine Trummer, Mayor, South St. Paul Larry Bakken, Councilmember, Golden Valley Bob Long, Councilmember, St. Paul Lu Stoffel, Mayor, Hastings • 2033 183 unlversi y avenue east, st paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -4008 • INTRODUCTION The League of Metropolitan Municipalities (LMM) was originally created in 1967, as a subsection and affiliate organization of the League of Minnesota Cities RMC). The impetus for forming the LMM was the creation of the Metropolitan Council, and the growth in importance and power of the regional operating agen- cies. It was felt that the cities of the seven- county metropolitan area needed an organization, separate from but complementary to the LMC, to interact with those agencies. In 1974, the LMM merged with the Suburban League of Municipali- ties to become the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM). As the needs of ARM member cities have changed over the years, the Board of Directors has strived to keep the organization relevant. During the late 1970's and throughout the 1980's, the Association's focus has broadened from strictly "metropolitan" affairs, to protecting the interests of member cities in state- wide issues with unique impacts for the metropolitan area. The most prominent recent example is the distribution of state aids to local governments. In 1984, the Association convened its first Mission and Membership Services Task Force to do an in depth study of the AMM and recommend needed changes. The major concern of that Task Force was the proliferation of splinter municipal lobbying groups within the metropolitan area. The 1984 Task Force was concerned that the AMM could lose its viability as an umbrella organization for all metro- * politan cities in the face of a growing number of smaller groups with differ- ences of opinion on the allocation of state aid resources. The group made :3 r, all of which have since been implementeu, with the exception of expanding the staff. The final recommendation of the 1984 report was that the Mission and Membership Services review process should be revisited every five years. Fortunately, predictions of any demise of the Association were ill- founded. Since the 1984 report was issued, five additional communities (West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Arden Hills, Blaine and Shoreview) have joined AMM. The Member- ship now includes 68 metropolitan cities, covering over 90 percent of the popu- lation in the seven - county area. This is an all -time high for the Association. Ironically, one of the splinter groups which existed in 1'84, the Municipal Caucus, has since gone out of existence after concluding that its aims and purposes were not that different from those of AMM. The meetings of this year's Mi!.sion and Membership Services Task Force, however, have taken place within the context of an increasing split between the metropo- litan area and Greater Minnesota over taxation, local government aid, and other state fiscal policies. The Task Force has studied carefully how the AMM mi ^ht be a more effective and united voice at the legislature on behalf of all cities in the seven- county metropolitan area. The Task Force has also considered the Association's relationship to the League of Minnesota Cities, and how it might help strengthen that organization in serving the interests of all cities throughout Minnesota. At the same time, the Task Force has not neglected the original focus of AMM, which was to moni!or and work with the metropolitan agencies. Of particular - 1 - 010431 concern is the observation that as AMM has become involved in more and more statewide issues, the staff has had a very noticeable decrease in the amount of time available to be spent in the area of metropolitan affairs. The Task Force feels strongly that the AMM should not only correct its decreased activity in metropolitan oversight, but should actually become proactive in helping set the regional agenda. 1 0 Richfield City Manager Jim Prosser and Golden Valley Councilmember Larry Bakken have drafted a revised "PURPOSES" Statement for incorporation in the Association bylaws. This document, attached as Appendix A, has been adopted by the Task Force as a recommended mission statement for the Association. In a nutshell, the recommended mission is well - summarized in the first item of that Purposes Statement: To serve as the exclusive and rp imary representative of the collec- tive interests oall ropolitan cities on metropolitan -wine and statewide issues w ti h unique metropolitan significance. To further that goal, the Task Force has made several observations and numerous recommendations for specific actions to enhance the success and performance of the Association. Those are set forth by topical area as follows, and prefaced by brief background material. During its deliberations the Task Force received input and advice from a number of resource persons. They are listed in Appendix B. The Task Force wishes tc express its gratitude for their time and counsel. • • X - 2 - RELATIONSHIP TO T LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES As indicated in the introduction, the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities was originally created as a subsection of the League of Minnesota Cities and remains in that status today. As such, we are the only organization entitled to an ex officio (with voting privileges) seat on the League Board of Dircctors. We are considered an "affiliate organization" of the League for the purposes of adopting legislative policy. The Association offices are located on the first floor of the LMC building. Cities in the seven - county metropolitan area comprise approximately 15 percent of the LMC membership, but because of their size pay about one -half of the LMC dues. The Task Force met with LMC President Millie McCloud, as well as Executive Director Don Slater. A member of the Task Force, New Brighton Mayor Bob Benke, currently serves as vice president of the League. The Task Force observations are that the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have maintained a very positive working relationship. Despite the split in the LMC membership over local government aid policies, the AMM has never taken a legislative position in direct opposition to any adopted policy of the League. In fact, LMC and AMM lobbying staffs work cooperatively in many areas of policy agreement (such as pay equity, labor relations law and tax increment financing). Officials from Greater Minnesota have raised concerns about the relaticnship between the League and AMM. Specifically, it has been questioned whether the AMM should have the ex officio seat on the Board, and whether the relationship between the staffs of the two organizations has been compromisingly close. Due to these concerns, as well as our own concerns about the effectiveness of AMM as a subsection of the League, the Task Force considered carefully whether the AMM should be incorporated as a separate , ,. ;tity. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Because of division in its membership, the LMC has been neutralized from effective lobbying on some critical issues like local government aid. This means that the AMM must become more vocal and assertive on behalf of its member cities in these policy areas. At the same time, we wish to support the efforts of LMC to bring together its membership on divisive issues, and recommend that the LMC develop effective consensus building and dispute resolution procedures that enable it to adopt policy positions that have credibility with the legislature. We encourage AMM member city officials to become more actively involved in the LMC, creating a metropolitan constituency group and perspective within the LMC. 2. We recommend that the Associatior ri ot be incorporated as a legal entity sc,.a,•ate from the League of Minnesota Cities. We wish to be supporti%e of is the LMC, and to encourage AMM member city officials to become more active in the league. We feel that this goal can be best accomplished in our curre status as subsection of the League. -3- .ZOO,( 3. We recommend that the AMM reject any requests that it give up the ex officio seat on the LMC Board. The Task FP-r_ )els strongly that we have lived up to the guidelines and spirit under which we are an affiliate organization (i.e. not taking contrary lobbying positions). 4. We recommend that, aS long as possible, the AMM offices remain in the LMC building. We feel that to move from the building would undermine much of the cooperative working relationship that exists between the staffs of the two organizations. It would also be expensive for the AMM to acquire the overhead and support services that it currently purchases from LMC. However, expansion of the AMM staff may make a move from the existing LMC building unavoidable. 5. We recommend that the AMM Board and Membership focus its agenda by refer- ring more of the non - divisive statewide issues to the LMC for lobbying on behalf of all member cities, both metropolitan and Greater Minnesota. • • 1031 - 4 - LOBBYING * egislative policy adoption and lobbying have become the major focus for the Association, growing steadily over the years. When the Association was formed in 1974, it had two standing policy committees and 35 legislative policies. Today the Association has five standing committees, and the membership has adopted over 100 legislative policies for the current biennium. In addition, several ad hoc study c -i mittees for spe lined topics (i.e. land use legisla- tion, metropolitan significance rules, gr.-up homes) have beQn formed in the past few years. Intrusion by the legislature into local affairs has increased dramatically in recent years. At the same time, other municipal lobbying groups, most notably the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, have aggressively promoted tax poli• ties that are detrimental to the collective interests of the metropolitan area. Consequently, the AMM lobbyists have been challenged to accomplish more and more at the legislature, without any significant increase in resources. Legislators with whom the Task Force met described our lobbying staff as com- petent and well respected. At the same time, the legislators admitted that the aggressive, and sometimes even abrasive tactics used by other municipal lobbying groups have probably led to more success in accomplishing their agenr In response to these concerns, the AMM for the first time hired contract lobbyists during the 1990 session. Legislators expressed their frustration with the increasing regionalism of city lobbying groups, and urged us to show a concern for the entire State at the same time we more actively pursue the interests of the metropolitan cities. It was also suggested that having a better data base for lobbying would be helpful in pressing the AMM position. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should seek to be seen as the organization with the authority and credibility to speak on behalf of a7 cities in the seven - county metropoli- tan area. 2. The AMM has become "spread too thin" in the number of policy issues it is lobbying, a!,. needs to limit active involvement to three types of issues: a) Issues of concern only to metropolitan cities - i.e. interaction with Metropolitan Council and operating agencies, Chapter 509 Watershed Management Organizations, etc. b) Statewide legislation with unique impacts in the metropolitan area - i.e. land use, solid waste, tax increment financing, etc. c) Statewide issues where the interests of the metropolitan area may be different than, and at times even contrary to, those in the remainder of the State - i.e. local government aid formulas Specific suggestions for limiting our most active legislative agenda items to these topics are included in the section on committees and the policy adoption process. 403 -5- 3. The AMM's lobbying efforts in the property tax area have been hindered by lack of immediate access to a computerized property tax model. The Task Force recommends that the AMM Board of Directors closely monitor the progress of the League of Minnesota Cities in developing a property tax model that is useable and immediately accessible to all cities. If this proves inadequate to meet our needs, the AMM membership should be prepared to bear the expense of developing its own property tax modeling system. 4. The AMM should be proactive, and not just reactive in its legislative posi- tions. For example, the AMM has never produced its own recommended formula for distribution of local government aids, and should consider doing so. 5. At the same time we become more proactive, we should also stay on the high road, adopting positions that reflect responsible public policy for the entire State of Minnesota. 6. AMM member city officials should become more active and involved in the League of Minnesota Cities and its policy study committees. In some cases, we may find ourselves lobbying the LMC, rather than the State legislature, to pursue particular policy positions that are of common interest to all cities in the metroplitan area. 1. The AMM should increase the amount of time it spends one -on -one with legislators explaining AMM positions. We should also hold metropolitan legislators more accountable to the AMM agenda by developing and publish- ing a "scorecard" following each legislative session. 8. In pursuing our legislative agenda, we should "pace ourselves ", realizing that lobbying is an ongoing process. Policy positions should be pursued not only for immediate gains, but for maintaininy a long -term positive relationship with the State government and with the League of Minnesota Cities. • - ;:o3I COMMITTEE STRUCTURE AND POLICY ADOPTION PROCESS The Association currently follows a procedure whereby potential legislative . policies are brought forth and considered for adoption in the five standing policy committees (revenues, metropolitan agencies, transportation, `fusing and economic development, general legislation). As indicated earlier, the Associ- ation currently has over 100 adopted legislative policies. The policies have been divided into categories as to level of effort in lobbying. The AMM now finds itself actively involved in issues that are not limited in inte est to the metropolitan area, even where our positions are similar to those of L.J es in Greater Minnesota. The best recent example is pay equity, where the AMM position is almost identical to that of the League of Minnesota Cities. Yet because of the high visibility and strong feelings surrounding this issue, many member cities expected the AMM staff to be active in lobbying on this is_ e. There is also the dilemma of issues that are of interest to a Single city, or a limited number of cities. The AMM Board and staff have attempted to be respon- sive to the needs of each member city, but a question is raised as to whether it is fair to take time and resources away from issues that are of more importance to the broader membership. The Task Force discussed at length what to do about issues that are divisive among our own members, for example fiscal disparities or funding for combined sewer overflow abatement. A majority of the committee concluded that the AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on these issues, as it would be left neutralized on issues of high portance to a large number of city offi- cials and thereby foster the growth of still more splinter groups. is rinally, the Task Force examined the five standing policy committees, concluding that they are working well and that none should be eliminated. In fact, it was speculated "that as new social and legislative problems appear (i.e. the drug crisis) there will likely be a need for additional standing or ad hoc committees. The Task Force further suggests that there may be utility in having a broad - based "futures" committee to simply help the organization anticipate and be prepared for pending issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Association needs to focus most of its resources and effort on the few iss of very highest priority to the entire membership. At the same time, the AMM should not narrow its agenda to the point that it loses the interest and support of its broad base of cities. 2. In order to accommodate the legitimate interests of all member cities, we recommend that AMM create an "endorsed" category of policies. These would be policies of interest to a limited number of cities, or those where the League of Minnesota Cities or some other group -light reasonably be expected to adequately represent the interests of metropolitan cities. With the AMM "endorsement ", the AMM would be officially on record as supporting these policies, but not actively involved in lobbying or initiating legislation. - 1 - Royo 3. The existing Legislative Coordinating Committee (LCC) should be the "screening and dividing" group for determining lobbying priorities and deciding which policies will be "endorsed" and referred to other groups (i.e. LMC) for lobbying. 4. We recommend that the Association strive to achieve real consensus on divisive issues, and not merely concurrence through a majority vote. Committee chairs as well as Board members might benefit from professional training in dispute resolution. The AMM should not avoid taking definitive positions on issues that are controversial among its own membership. While such avoidance may "buy peace" in the short term, in the long term it neutralizes the effec- tiveness of the organization, undermining its credibility with legislators and causing the proliferation of splinter groups surroinding special issues. The AMM should make use of dispute resolution services, such as the Office of Dispute Resolution in the State Planning Agency and the Mediation Center, a private non - profit community mediation service based in St. Paul. 5. The two - thirds majority vote requirement for adoption of legislative policies should be retained. • U n a04% - 8 - OTHER METROPOLITAN LOBBYING GROUPS The Task Force met with Minnetonka City Manager Jim Miller, regarding the Muni- cipal Legislative Commission, and Brooklyn Park Mayor Jim Krautkramer repre- senting the Northern Mayors' Association. The Task Force observation is that the AMM has been able to form effective and cooperative relationships with these specialized groups, and that they should not be seen as a threat to the AMM. As indicated in the introduction, an additional splinter group which existed in 1984, the Municipal Caucus, has since gone out of existence. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. We recommend that the AMM strive to be the organization seen as the legiti- mate voice to speak on behalf of all cities `.n the seven - county metropoli- tan area, while recognizing the legitimate need of some breakoff groups for special purposes. 2. The AMM should not perceive existing specialized groups as a threat, but attempt to maintain a cooperative and mutually supportive relationship. 3. We recommend that the AMM i- aintain its openness to all cities in the seven - county metropolitan area, resisting any impetus to limit membership to a more limited group (i.e. suburban caucus). • • RELATIONSHIP TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND OPERATING AGENCIES As indicated in the Introduction, monitoring and oversight of the Metropolitan Council and regional operating agencies was the original focus of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Yet in recent years, involvement with the Council and agencies has suffered appreciably as the AMM staff has had to spend more and more time supporting the work of its own committees and lobbying on statewide issues. In fact, the staff indicated that it now has almost no time for any involvement with the Metropolitan Council during the legislative session. The AMM currently nominates to the Metropolitan Council eight names for appoint- ment to the Transportation Advisory Board. The Association actually appoints ten to the Transportation Advisory Committee. That system seems to be working well. In contrast, the AMM, along with several other metropolitan area asso- ciations, was recently given legislative responsibility for suggesting appoin- tees to the Regional Transit Board. That process did not go well. The Board of Directors did not limit the number of people recommended for appointment to the vacant seats, and the Metropolitan Council heeded very few of its recommen- dations in making their selections. During its background work, the Task Force discussed the Metropolitan Council at some length with several legislators, as well as the current Chair of the Metropolitan Council and a former executive director of the Citizens League. There was a general feeling among the legislators that the Council has not been effective in performing its functions well. At the same time, it was suggested that the Councilmembers are frustrated due to their lack of a "real clout" and constant legislative undercutting of their authority to accomplish the work for which they are responsible. With no consensus in the legislature or in the metropolitan area as to the appropriatEf amount of authority that should be vested in the Council, many metropolitan regional issues get resolved vis -a -vis the political process of the legislature. The shortcoming of this approach is that the metropolitan area is giving up some of the authority to set its own agenda. There is also some con- fusion and ambiguity over the relationship of the Council to the Governor, who is responsible b� law for appointing its members. It was suggested that the AMM could very definitely be of help in defining the proper role for the Council and the operating agencies, and in mustering legislative support to enact needed changes. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should become more proactive in helping set the metropolitan agenda. Historically we have placed ourselves in somewhat of a watchdog or adver- sarial role with the Council and operating agencies, merely reacting to the proposals put forward. We should become more positive in identifying areas of legitimate regional involvement, and help to set the goals and objec- tives to be pursued by regional government, as well as the parameters within which that work will be carried out. 2. We need to "be there ". It is estimated that an AMM staff member should be at the Metropolitan Council and agencies from eight to sixteen hours per X043 - 10 - week, interacting with the Councilmembers and the staff, and keeping affected cities informed and up -to -date as to what is happening in regional government. Other responsibilities have kept the staff from full commitment to this vital role, and this shortcoming should be corrected expeditiously. 3. The appointment of members to the Transportation Advisory Board and Technical Advisory Committee seems to be functioning well, and should continue as present. 4. The AMM should continue to support its legislative responsibility to nomi- nate persons for appointment to the Regional Transit Board. The AMM Board of Directors should do a better job of screening the applications which are received, so as to indicate to the Metropolitan Council those people that it truly wants appointed to the RTB. 5. The Task Force recommends that the AMM pursue the possibility of the creation of a metropolitan appointments review committee for the merit review of persons being considered for appointment to the Metropolitan Council and other regional agencies. The selection board would include representatives appointed by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, the Metropolitan Intercounty Association, the Citizens League, the League of Women Voters, etc. 6. Finally, the Task Force recommends that the AMM be the impetus for creaticn of a blue ribbon committee to study and better define the mission, role and purposes of the Council and regional agencies. While AMM would be the host, it would be important to involve other government associations and "good government" groups. Also, the the task should be approached in a spirit of cooperation with the Metropolitan Council members. The study of the blue ribbon committee should include alternatives for the selection and appointment of Metropolitan Council members. • - 11 - Joyy PUBLIC RELATIONS If, as suggested in the revised Purposes statement, the AMM is to be the • exclusive representative of the collective interests of the metropolitan cities, then it is important that the Association increase its visibility in the eyes of the legislature and the general public. The Task Force reviewed and endorsed the work of the AMM's Legislative Coordinating Committee Public Relations Subcommittee to establish a public relations system to inform the public, including media, legislators, and AMM legislative contacts about metropolitan city issues. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Media contacts should be identified in each AMM- member city vis -a -vis a legislative contact response form. Legislative contacts in each city should be responsible for interaction with local newspapers, radio, city newsletters, cable television, etc. 2. The AMM staff should identify and establish relationships with contacts within the major metropolitan area media, both print and electronic. 3. A delegation of the AMM staff and Legislative Coordinating Committee should meet with major newspaper staffs early in legislative sessions to discuss AMM priorities and positions. Media contacts, both local and metropolitan wide, should be invited and encouraged to attend our legislative breakfasts. 4. During legislative sessions, we should issue specific press releases on AMM priori -ties, and response to important issues (i.e. tax policy) as changes are proposed. 5. At the conclusion of each legislative session, we should issue press releases on the AMM's legislative agenda, and how well we believe the legislature met the needs of metropolitan area municipalities. 6. We recommend that AMM develop a "report card" of priority issues with ratings for each legislator. These should be distributed to member cities with suggestions for potential local use. 7. We need to identify potential allies on important issues, i.e. Chambers of Commerce, League of Women Voters, etc. 0 2" C - 12 - COMMUNICATIONS WITH MEMBER CITY OFFICIALS The Task Force feels that the AMM needs to develop a metropolitan "conscious- ness" among member city officials, so that they will buy into and promote t-he AMM's agenda. Unfortunately, Councilmember time is scarce, making it difficult to insure that each and every member city official is well- informed and aware of AMM activities, policies and priorities. The first recommendation of the 1984 Task Force report was that the AMM should expand its effort to communicate directly with all elected officials in member cities, as opposed to only mayors and city managers. Since that time, the AMM has had differing distribution lists for different types of communications. Apparently, this is causing a great deal of confusion, and may actually be causing a decrease in consistent communications. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The AMM should strive to publish a short executive summary of legislative positions that could be quickly read by member city officials who don't want the "full shot ". 2. An AMM contact person, preferably the City Manager /Administrator, should be developed in each city. All communications should be sent to that one con- tact person, plus the Mayor, with the contact person taking responsibility for seeing that the material is duplicated and sent to all members of the governing body. The AMM contact person will also be responsible for • reporting on AMM activities at the Council meeting. AMM should work with the Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA) to enlist the support of Managers /Administrators for reproduction and distribution of these'c- ommunications. 3. Member cities should be encouraged to place disc +ssion of AMM policies and issues on regular City Council agendas to ensure that all elected officials are kept aware of AMM activities, as well as to increase the Association's visibility with local media. 4. Each member of the AMM Board of Directors should commit to make a brief presentation at four or five surrounding City Council meetings once each year on AMM policies and activities. • - 13 - AoU WORKLOAD AND STAFFING When origUally formed, the AMM had four full -time staff members. Shortly thereafter, in response to a financial shortfall, the staff was cut to three and has remained at that number since. 0 During that time, the number of legislative policies has increased from 35 to over 100, and the number of legislative study committees from two to five. The Association has taken on other responsibilities including the license and permit survey, and coordination and administration of the Metropolitan Salary Survey. With more time being spent on lobbying of statewide issues and support for committees, there has been a decided time shift 'way from interaction with the Metropolitan Council and operating agencies. Yet the AMM is the only organiza- tion providing any real oversight of these agencies. For example, we are usually the only commentor on the Metropolitan Councils annual work program and budget. The AMM Membership has come to expect more involvement by the Association, not only in metropolitan issues, but in tax policy, pay equity, tax increment financing, and other areas of statewide concern and involvement. The 1984 kission and Membership Services Task Force report recommended very strongly that the Board of Directors seek ways to add a staff member. Yet this is the only one of the 1984 recommendations that has yet to be implemented. To quote that report. "the present staff simply cannot adequately cover all the critical issues, agencies, committees and the legislature." The present Task Force report, if ultimately adopted and implemented by the Board and membership, will only serve to increase the workload significantly. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. The Task Force strongly recommends that the Board of Directors add a staff person. We further recommend that this person have responsibilities in: a. communicating with member cities and maintaining the legislative contact system b. public relations, including media contacts c. staffing some of the standing and ad hoc legislative committees d. some monitoring of Metropolitan Council and agency activities, particularly during the legislative session. 2. With regard to lobbying at the Capitol, the Task Force observes that this effort will fluctuate from time to time. Therefore, it is recommended that increased efforts in this area be handled through use of contract lobbyists. 0 - 14 - 26041 DUES The membership dues for the Association are currently set at 46 percent of a member's dues for the League of Minnesota Cities. Since the League dues are set in part on a per capita basis, this works out to AMM dues ranging from a high of • 30 cents per capita for Woodland to a low of 4 cents for Minneapolis. The dues for an aver *ge sized city of 30,000 population are $5,100, or about 17 cents per capita. Compared to other city lobbying organizations, the AMM is a bargain! For example, the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities charges its members 40 cents per capita, plus from time to time, an additional 20 cents per capita for 'special projects ". Dues for the Municipal Legislative Commission are approxi- mately 35 cents per capita, to a maximum of $12,500. If the AMM Board of Directors and membership are to implement our recommendation to add a staff person, a dues increase beyond the rate of inflation is inevi- table. In addition, the cost of developing the computerized property tax model, if determined necessary, will be a considerable initial expense, and require ongoing personnel and data gathering costs. RECOMMENDATION 1. In order to implement the other recommendations in this report, the AMM Board of Directors and membership should be prepared to adopt a dues increase in the range of 20 to 25 percent above the rate of inflation. The Board may wish to look at ways of phasing the dues increase over a two to • three year period. 2. The Board and membership should also be prepared to provide financial sup- port for development and maintenance of a property tax modeling system, if the LMC system fails to materialize or is determined inadequate to meet the lobbying needs of the AMM. 0 - 15 - ,20Vt SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is now in its 16th year. During its relatively short existence, the Association has experienced many diffi -. culties and challenges. Examples include the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the more recent debates over local government aid. S Despite predictions for the demise for general purpose organizations like the Association, the AMM is now at an all -time high of 68 member cities, repre- senting over 90 percent of the population in the seven- county metropolitan area. The cities of the region apparently believe that they are getting a good value for their membership dollars. However, despite the successes of the past, the twelve members of this years Mission and Membership Services T. -_I Force have concluded that this is no time to rest on our laurels. We face crallenges from other city lobbying groups whose interests are contrary to those of the metropolitan area, as well as a generally hostile attitude by the State legislature toward cities. At the same time, the complexity of governing the metropolitan area is increasing geometri- cally, meaning that it is more important than ever to work together if we are to effectively serve the citizens of our respective communities. The Task Force concludes that in order to remain viable aid relevant, the AMM must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropoli- tan area to express in a united voice the important perspect ve of local govern- ment. The issues at stake are simply too important to abandon the playing field and leave all the important decisions to others. The Association was originally formed out of several metropolitan area splinter groups who had originally felt that they had little in common, but came to realize that the things they did have in common were far more than those that divided them. The challenges of today are certainly no less than those that faced our cities in the past. Our test will be whether we can continue to be an effective voice for the collective interests of the cities in this metropolitan area, and to pass that test will require two things: 1. A renewed ability and commitment to come together through our com- mittees and 19- member Board of Directors to reach a consensus on the critical issues that face us. 2. The ability to effectively, and with a united front, promote the policies we do adopt to the Governor, the legislature, the Metropolitan Council and the regional operating agencies. The Mission and Membership Services Committee feels that the recommendations set forth in this report will set us well on a course to accomplishing just that. We ccnmend it for your consideration and thoughtful action. • - 16 - 201 APPXNDIX A PURPOSES The purpose of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities shall b• Fo• 1. Serve as the exclusive and primary representative of the collective interests of all metropolitan cities on metropolitan vide issues and state vide issues with unique metropolitan significance. 2. Promote collaborative problem solving efforts between and among cities, the State, the Legislature, private interests and other public interests. 3. Effectively express in a unified voice, policies concerning the structure, powers and other matters relating to municipal government for the municipalities in the metropolitan area to the Legislature,. Metropolitan Council and agencies, LMC, media and cities. 4. Serve as a forum through which all municipalities or groups of municipalities may develop and propose policies and pcsitions on matters on concern to the metropolitan municipalities and develop strategies for advocating those policies and positions. 5. Serve as a forum for the interchange of ideas and information • among municipalities in the metropolitan area and to foster intermunicipal cooperation. 6. Assist member cities resolve disputes with other cities and agencies. 7. Develop and provide, either alone or in concert with League of Minnesota Cities or other organizations or agencies, programs of technical assistance to member municipalities. S. Establish specific prioritized agenda, including Legislative proposals to address member community needs. 9. Foster, generate and promote information and data concerning the problems and issues and proposed solutions affecting municipal government in the metropolitan area to the State Legislature, in particular, and to the public at large. 10. Enhance the effectiveness of municipal government in the metropolitan area by holding conferences and by fostering pertinent research projects. 11. Coordinate the efforts of AMM members to promote their interests within the Teague of Minnesota Cities. 12. Enhance the quality of life in the metropolitan area and its cities by promoting efficient and progressive service delivery is systems fcrr our residents. ao Sb APPENDIX B List of resource persons who consulted with the Task Farce: • Vern Peterson, Executive Director, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs, Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Donald Slater, Executive Director, League of Minnesota Cities Jim Miller, Minnetonka City Manager and Representative of Muni,ipal Legislative Commission Jim Krautkramer, Brooklyn Park Mayor, President of Northern Mayors' Association Millie M�Cloud, President, League of Minnesota Cities State Representative Phil Carruthers (DFL -41B), Chair of Metro Affairs • Subcommittee of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee State Representative Alice Johnson (DFL -51A), Vice Chair of House Local Government and Metropolitan Affairs Committee Al Loehr, Legislative Administrative Assistant to Senator Bob Schmitz (DFL -36), Chair of Senate Local and Urban Affairs Committee Steve Keefe, Chair, Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Ted Kolderie, Former Executive Director, Citizens League of the Twin Cities • aos I 0-4 W Com b s Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 20rd Avenue North Plymouth V—esuta 55447 'e 476 6010 4'6 -8532 FAX June 28 1990 �J Mr: Edward J. Shukle, Jr., City Manager REC U� City of Mound 53 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 5536 SUBJECT: City Hall Addition & Remodeling MFRA #8876 Dear Ed: Eng neers P a�ners S.rveyors Enclosed is Shingobee's Payment Request No. 3 for work comple d through June 27, 1990, on the subject project. The amount of this payment request is $131..854.54. We have reviewed this request, find that it is in order, and recommend payment in the above amount to the Contractor. US. If you have any questions or need additi information, please contact Sincerely, McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. .c Ste% .4. Jantzen, P. A SJ:jej Enclosure 12 An Equal Opportunely Employer APFLICITI01 All CIPTIFICATI fOI FATNIIT PAGI "I CITT Of 10111 1101: 5111GOISI 1111,/IRS, INC. 5341 U11001 ROAD IPOJICT: V111 CITY TALL APFLICAtI(1 10: 3 30110 11 SS114 Shingobee Builders Inc. PIIIOD f10N: 15111 279 N. Medina Street 101 46121/91 Loretto MN 55357 AICIITICT'S +11111101: COItPACt 101: AIDITION / AINODIL PIOJICI 10: 1 CONTRACT DATI: WWII • .........................•--•--------------•------...........-------•---------......--•--------- .....•- •....•••.......... COITIACTOI'S APILICATION 101 PATNINT CI1161 01111 SINNAII AO111IOIS DIDIC1101S ....................... O11L !1111013 S114.64 1.11 ........................................ 0111111 SIATIS OPIGIIAL CONTRACT SIN 163281.11 III Of CIAIG9 OIDIRS 12311.11 CONTRACT SIN 10 Ull 115519.01 TOTAL CONFUTII 110 S10IID 111639.11 RIIAINICI: CONPLITID 1011 STOPID NATIIIAL 1115 P11101 O 1 1111 2 16121191 - 151.41 4 6111194 l3S 11.11 6 4611191 - 41.41 7 46121191 6144.14 • • ......................................... - TOTALS - 11641.14 - 1198.00 191 CIiKI 11341.41 STATI Of: ))A- COIITT 01:, _ ' 311 Ill913141 l COITRACIOP CIPTIFIIS TIA1 10 111 LIST Of 115 1101LIDGI SIISCPII9D AND 51011 10 111011 NI 1NIS W01111I11 UI S9LIIf 111 1019 COfIIII 11 1115 AFFLICATIO1 FOP 21 DA/ 01 < ✓ , 19'i� 4IIIi1 US ItII COIFLITID I1 ACCOPDAICI 1111 Tit C0I1IACI DOCI• IOTAIT FOLLIC: NITS, TUT ALL A1011t5 IITI 1111 fill IT 111 FOR 1019 101 IIICI 111TIOIS ClIfIFICATIS 101 f1T1111 1919 ISSOII AID FITIIITS 1ICIITID IT CONNISSI01 IIPIRISd C- — `> PION TII Intl, All TIRT CIRRI? PATNIIT 51011 II1Ill 15 101 099. THOMAS L ✓ M aODLEVSq .01111CI011 C COfrIfa11�t10n Espirro 12 3T: I DAtI: �, ,�� �: x /.1.!:`.:1_......_ -- - .......................................... ACIITItt'S CUTIFICATI FOE FATNINT ANOD11 CIPTIFIID ...............5 I 1 4 , �A i1 accord vltb tie C^ot w t Docosests, based is ,s -sit! IAttacb !rplaoatrm if ueast mtifi!d differs Ase rvsticos aid tie doti cooprlsioa tit above applfcattre, frco tb! ::root applied for.) the Ircbateet certlf m tr tL! On!r tbat t^ tie best if the ARCNITICT: Achitect's I/o11!dge, iWizati^i aid belief tie Lark bit �• �O �C piolrewf as ii9icated, tie joility of tie ear: is Is ly: Dat!: lecerdaoce with the Cestract Docsieots, aid ti! Coetrastor Tbis cetttftcite is t gyttable. Tb! ANOI)l is elta W to P1;111t of tie AN011T CIPTIFIID. CIPTIFIII is p4711 ^ill to the Contractor WCarrbs Fraoric Roos Assoc. Inc. oiled beets. Issoanc!, pays /ot aid alc "teoc• 15050 23rd #.venue North of payrest srt sitb ^at prelodi^f to iey rilbta Plymouth MI 55447 of the 01511 or Ccottactcr loder tits C ^stract, TOTAL IITAIIAG9 21163.91 TOTAL IAPIID LISS IRTAIIAGI 116115.19 LISS yIIVIODS CIRTIIICAT9S 11121.55 COIPIII PATNIIT III 131151.51 IALAICI # 111§11AGI 569113.91 14aSI CO,�TIINITI01 511!1 IPPLICAfI01 111 C1I1IFICITI ►OR PATNIIT PAGI 2 1101: 511160111 11ILD11S, 11c. AMICAT101 1111111: 10 171 11 10111 FROJIM N0111 CITT TALL IPFLIC11101 OAM 1612 5141 UTlOOI IOA1 PIRIOD 1101 15131191 141111 O 51164 COMICT 1011 ADDITIOI I RINODIL 10: 46/2 Cif ARCIITICUS FIOJICT l0: 4 ...........................................---...................-----........---------........----------------------------------- 1 I ......................................----............----......-----.......---------------........---------- C D 1 P G 1 ...------------- I - - - - -. UPI CONPLITID ------------------ - ----- a o5V TOTAL NATIPIAL CONFLITID Cif SCIIDOLIO FRIIIOIS TITS FRISIITLT AID STOW t PALAICI S b. 11SCII11I01 OP 1011 TALII AFFLICATIOIS P11I00 Sf01ID TO DATI CONF. TO 1IIISI RITAIIAGI - - - - -. --------------------------------------------------------------.....------------..........------....------------------------- 4001 01111L 1101I111111s 0111.11 1010.26 11511.24 4.14 42219.S4 so 42219.S1 4221.!5 2112 I111LITI01 15359.11 1.11 153S.9/ 1.11 1535.9/ II 13023.11 15 ?.59 2221 RICITATI16, IICIIILL i CON? 1021.14 !631.11 1.44 1.11 9633.11 6S SI01.1/ 99?.31 211! UP11LTIC 1ATIIG 2 ?144.11 1.01 1.11 1.11 1.10 1 23411.11 0.00 2411 WIN sllllcs IN 14.0 1 ?911.14 4.41 4.11 12911.41 111 1.11 1291.1! 2111 191/11119 PALLS 5116.11 1.11 1.11 1.14 1.11 1 5176.11 PM 3111 CuT•II COICIRTI 72#45.10 10111.25 36122.51 4.41 Su 33.76 is 10111.25 S413.19 3415 PRICISI- CO1C1111 14454.11 1.14 110/./1 1.11 11461.11 lot 1.11 1145.P1 5121 ITRICTIIIL i RISC. still, 11152.44 IS45.21 13546.01 1.11 15942.11 111 1.44 ISIS.24 iNl ROM[ CARPRITNT 011.11 1.11 1131.71 4.11 1131.71 1s SO46.11 11!.17 2 1IIIs1 C111111TT 21#4S.10 1.11 0.11 4.44 1.14 1 21145.11 1.11 11MIgOIS IAIPPROOIIIG 914.11 910.11 4.11 1.0 944.11 141 1.41 91.14 1 Collis IISILITI01 SISTIN 44141.44 4.14 6711.11 1.11 6711.14 is 10129.11 671.14 7211 11111TOPPINi 62!.11 1.11 1.14 4.11 1.14 1 620.11 1.00 1512 RLISTORNIC ROOM 11369.10 1.44 11495.21 1.11 11495.24 a$ 2073.04 II .S2 79H JOINT SIALl1S 144.41 1.11 261,41 4.11 261.11 21 1441.11 29.41 1111 61111, Pools i IIINIS 14701.11 2154.14 1617.44 1.41 3773.11 35 1447.14 377.34 1210 1001 DOORS 1652.11 4.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1 2662.11 1.11 1151 1Lo1IM6 S1,11 Not 1111.04 4.14 4.14 1.14 4.14 4 1144.14 1.11 1164 SICTIOIIL OfI11I11 2671.44 1.41 2671.11 k 2971.00 114 1.11 16'.14 1111 [[Miss 1AIIC!1I 0527.11 4.14 1.14 1.11 4.14 1 0117,11 1.11 M cuss i RUING 5114.11 1.14 1.14 1.11 1.11 1 5211.10 111 91H OUL iT14 515111 2151 1.14 20SI. 1.11 2051.11 11 15665134 205.1 9111 CI111IC 111,1 1LOols ?921.11 1.14 4.41 1.41 1.11 1 ?!11.14 1.11 9511 A"ISTICAL CHUMS 3151.14 1.11 4.14 1.41 1.44 1 3141.11 1.14 fill IISILIIIT !LOOP 911.11 1.11 1.44 1.14 1.11 1 914.11 1.14 941 Clu1RTU6 1302.14 1.44 14221.44 1.11 14224.11 7S 1100.44 112.14 99" 11I11114 ItSl/.11 1.14 1.11 1.11 1.0! 4 10511.14 f.41 lliii MIL TOILS[ CONPAIT1911 111:.14 4.41 4.41 1.4f 1.41 0 1142.14 1.41 11211 11111, PALL LOIIIRS 1664.1! 1.11 1.10 1.11 1,44 1 1661.11 0.10 1140 slogs 095.11 1.04 4.10 1.14 1.14 1 099.11 f.!! 11411 111111101 11101 1126.11 1.04 1.94 1.11 1.11 1 1126.11 t.11 11412 STONAGI RACIS 1460.11 4.14 1.14 4.11 4.14 1 1169.11 1.44 1111 TOILIT i [ill ACCISS. 15!1.44 4.11 1 11 144 4.41 4 1534.11 f.!! 11511 10111011AL WITH OLIIOS 19:1.41 1.14 4.11 1.11 1.14 4 091.44 f.04 d 5 IIIIMIC IL511T015 34211.44 1.14 1.14 1.44 1.44 1 14113.10 1.44 a o5V C0I11HAf101 SIIIf APPLICATION AID CIRTIFICATI FOR PATRIOT PAGI 3 11011 51110111 81IUIIS, INC. APPLICATION IINIM l foe tlfT Of 10111 PIIVICT: NOIID CITT TALL APPLICATION NAM 16111/91 Slll IAYIOOD 1011 FIRIOD PION: 15131/9/ 10119 11 SIM CONTRACT f0h ADDITION I IINODIL T0: 16111191 AICIITICT'S P107IC1 I0t 1 ------------- ----------- --------------- A 1 -------- C ------ - ---------- D - - --------- I ------ -- -- --- f - - --- - - --- G ------ ----- ........... ----------------- 1 .......... ---- I . . . . .. ....................................................................................................... 1011 CONFLITID -- ---------------- ------ TOTAL NATIIIAL CONPLITII CAT SCIIIILII PRITI015 TITS PRISINTLT All STORID I BALANCI S M. DISC1111101 Of I011 TALII APPLICATIONS 111101 MIND f0 DATI CORP. ............ TO 111151 ............. 11911AG3 ...... ................................................................................................... 15111 I /AC 12,111.0 311131 1011.01 1.11 18555.11 l5 11510.11 1155.51 1S4N FUNDING 2S111.0 121!.15 2 1 511.5! 1.11 3866.25 15 21911. 3!633 ISSN fill PROTICf101 IISN. N 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 1 18111.14 0.0 16111 ILICTRICAL 51691.11 516531 516!.51 1.11 11539.11 21 16156.11 11'3.4 11/1 OTIIIIAI 6 PROFIT 53111.11 9511.04 11664.11 1.91 1120.41 -- --- 11 ----- - ----- 31811.14 ------- - -- 2121.04 --- --- - ---- ----------- ------------------------------------ - SUBTOTAL - 011411AL CONTRACT ...................... 161281.1 ........ ---- - - ----- ------------------------- !1113.96 ... ... .... 116118.11 .................... ----- 1.11 ... ----- 21P12.01 ... .......... 32 ..... .... S2231S.ff ..... .... - . 21191.21 .... ........ ........ .............. CRAM OUItS: .• .I CIAIGI 0110 Il 151.11 4.44 !:5.14 1.11 125.14 l5 1615.11 12.54 DILITI IMMORAL SIGN - 191.14 0.01 - 191.40 1.11 - 198.11 111 1.11 -19.14 / IIILD Oil 01 2 OTIRIAIGS 11541.1 4.14 1.19 1.11 4.41 1 13514.14 1.11 1 DILITI SIGN C ?ISTRIC1101 FR - 311.14 4.11 - 311.11 1.11 - 311.41 111 d. of - 4.0 1 01I1I01 10 t0 11 1111.1 4.41 1.14 1.11 1.41 1 1611.11 4.14 --------------------------------------- - SUBTOTAL - CIAIGI OIDIIS ....... - ........................................ --------------- 22312.0 - - - - -- 4.44 .... --- ... ............. --------------------------------------------------------------------- - 213.11 ........... 1.11 ..... - 113.14 ...... - ......... 1 ............. 22515.01 - ........ -21.31 - .... ...................................................................... .. MID TOTALS - - ........... ........................................................................................ 11558!.1 9113 ?19E . ........................................................... 1165p5.11 1.11 11009.14 31 ............ 511951.14 ............. 2410.91 . . .... cos: McCombs Frank Rods Associ Inc. 0 - 4 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Mmnesoi' 55447 Telephone Enq veers 612476 -6010 Planers 612:476 -8532 FAX Surveyors July 3, 1990 Mr. Edward J. Shukle. City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 SUBJECT: City of Mound. Minnesota 1990 Maintenance Dredging Project City Property MFRA 07090 Dear Ed: Enclosed is Minnetonka Portable Dredging. Inc.'s Final Payment Request No. 3, in the amount of $1.030.50 for the 1990 Maintenance Dredging Project. Because this work is fully completed. we do not recommend any amount be retained. We have reviewed the project with Jim Fackler, Parks Director. and find that the work was completed in accordance with the plans and specifications. It is our recommendation that the Contractor be paid in full for this project. US. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Very truly yours, McCOMBS FRANC: ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. John Cameron JC:aju Enclosures 0 OROS4 An Equal Opportunity Employer PAYMENT REQW-ST NO. 3 (FINAL) CITY OF MUM, MINNESOTA O 1990 Maintenace! Dredging City Property v MFRA 07090 CONTRACTOR Minnetonka Portable Dredging 500 West Lake Street Excelsior, Minnesota 55 CONTRACT LOUT ITEM QUANTITY PRICE 1. Area A L.S. 23,100.00 2. Area H L.S. 7,150.00 3. Area C L.S. 4,100.00 ENGINEER McComhs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. 15050 23rd Avernie North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 WORK COMPLETED TOTAL 100% $ 23,100.00 100% 7,150, o1 1005 4,100.00 Contract Amount $ 34,350.00 Work Completed Through 6 -30 -90 34,350.00 Less Retainage 0.00 Work Completed Less Retainaqe E 4, Less Previous Payments 33,319.50 Amount of Payment Request No. 3 $ 1,030.50 I hereby certify that this estimate is true and correct. MINNETONKA PORTABLE DREDGING CO. Ay: Date: Approved and recommended for payment in the amount of $ 1,030.50. ticMIBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. By: (7, n Date : CITY OF NOUN), MINNESOTA ay: Date: •i is BILLS - - - - -- -JULIE 10, 1990 i s • BATCH 0063 BATCH 0064 42,643.68 240,786.38 Nova Environmental Serv. Subsurface Investig 3,225.00 TOTAL BILLS 286,655.06 JOSS PAGE 1 PURCHASE JOURNAL [44TE 6/30% AP- CO2-01 CITY OF MOUND T: ME 9 .09.14 VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -PAID CHM NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACL'OINVT NUMBER AMOUNT CHE D A .ATS 60540 PRE - PAID 1,6 0 1.14 LIQ 71 - 7100 - 9510 6M / 6/30 ;' 1,6 JRNL -CD 1010 16 ?�L •ti r1 °1 PREPAID 704.15 LIQ 7 1- 7100 -9`10 6/30! 0 6/30! 704.15 JRN. -CD !010 714 .15 BELLBOY CORPORATION VENDOR TOTAL :395.24 80571 PRE -PAID 719.98 2 AIR IWITIONERS 73- 7 300-`400 99.99 MAINT CONTRACT -AIR CONDITNRS 73- 7300 -3800 9.99 COVER -AIR CONDITIE$ER 73 -7300 -2:'00 10.01 A/C OVERPYMT -CASH RETUKD 73- 73^0 -5000 6/30/90 6/30/ 839.97 J K -CD 1010 839.97 34680 6/2 BEST BUY COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 839.97 rn PRE -PAID 66.62 REPLEN P /C- RESERVES 01- _300 -02_'0 6/301 ~, 66.62 JOC -CD 1010 66.62 1 065 0 6'1 ?190 PRE -PAID 54.97 REPLEN P!C- POLICE 01-4140 -2200 6/30/90 6/30/90 54.97 JRN -CD 1010 54. 3440 5!22/90 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR TOTAL 121.59 CIOOI PRE -PAID 2,609. SIT 6/23 PR 01-2040-0000 6/10/90 61301 2,60 JRNL -CD 1010 260 3003 COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE VENDOR TOTAL 2609.49 D1219 PREPAID 383.44 40.5 CONTRACT HOURS 81-4354 -3100 19.36 MILEAGE -DEL 81 -4350 -3w. 6/30! 6/30! 403.30 JRNl -CD 1010 403.30 30669 6!26' DELBERT RUDOLPH VENDOR TOTAL 403.30 D137.8 PREPAID 64.00 PIZZA FOR MTG 01-4140-4120 6/30190 6/.A0/90 64.00 JRNL -CD 101 r , 64.00 31iF52 51:8/ 1►OMIN2 PIIIA VENDOR TOTAL 64.00 E1429 PRE -PAID Q LIQ 71-7100 -9`10 19.90- DISC 71-7100- 6/30 1 6;30 975.99 JRN. -CD PI"' 975.44 ?406 6119!90 PRE -PAID 739.25 TINE 71-7100-9520 6/30/90 6/30/ 749.25 JRNL -CD 1010 734.25 30666 6'25; ED PHILLIPS k SONS VENDOR TOTAL 1715.24 G1955 PREPAID 1,155.00 DEF COMP 6/r PR 01-2040 -0000 10 6/30190 6130/90 1,155.00 JRN. -CD 1010 1155.00 30678 6128 GREAT WEST LIFE ASSURANCE VENDOR TOTAL 1155.00 01 -b-S PRE-PAID 491.12 LIG 71-7100 - 4 MINE 71- 7100 -9520 - G S/ 30 G PAGE 2 PURCHASE 10URNAI [SATE 6/30/90 W- 00:-01 CITY OF M0111ND TIME 9.09,14 YEW INVOICE ME HOLD PRE -PAID CHECK NVOICE NMDR DATE DATE STATUS NUNT DESCRIPTION Acmm'r NUMBER Aiwa NT CHECK 0 DATE '.52- DISC 71 -?.00 -'060 21.11 FRT 71 - -9600 141.20 MIx 6/30/00 6130/90 1,124.77 JRNL -CD 1010 1124.77 30654 6119, "9n PRE -PAID 1,347.17 L I4 71-'100 -9510 152.32 MIME 71- 7100 -9520 31.28- DISC 71- 7100 - 0 560 12.53 FRT 71-7100- 0 600 6/30190 6/30;90 1,480.74 JRNL -CD 1010 1480.74 30664 6/26/ GRIGOS COOPER L COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 2605.51 M2145 PRE -PAID 288.46 DED 6/23 PR 01-2040 -0000 6130190 6/30190 288.46 JRNL -CD 1010 280.46 30675 6/28190 HENN CO SUPPORT i COLLECT# VENDOR TOTAL 288.46 123D1 PREPAID 512.90 ICMA DEF CUP 6/23 PR 01- 2040-0000 6/30/90 6/30/90 512.90 JRNL-CD 1010 5!2.90 30676 V /90 IOVI RETIREMENT TRUST -457 VENDOR TOTAL 512.90 10 PRE -PAID 91.98 ICMA 6./23 PR 01- .040 -npr,0 6/30/90 6/30/90 91. JRML-CD 1010 91.9A 30677 6!28/90 ICMA RETIREMENT 1RUST-401 VENDOR TOTAL 91.98 J233S PRE -PAID 765.00 PLMB INSPECTIONS 01-4190 -3100 6/30/90 6/30/90 765.00 JRML -CD 1010 7f500 30671 6/:6190 JOHN MEITNER VEND TOTAL 765.00 J2571 PRE -PAID 485.28 72 CONTRACT HOERS 01-4340-3100 6/30/90 6/30/90 485.28 JRNL-CD 1010 4'9,2? 30670 6/26/90 JOHN TAFFE VENDOR TOTAL 4k5.28 J 1 2579 PRE -PAID 3,130.88 LIQ 71-7100 -9`10 785.07 MINE 71-7100 - 9 520 70.57- DISC 71- 7100 -9560 6/30190 6/30/90 3,845.18 JR L-CD 1010 V45.18 I(Mei 6!19/ PREPAID 1,341.32 LIQ 11-7100- 38=.47 MINE 71-7100-9520 30.68- DISC 71- 7100 -9560 6/30/90 6/30/90 1,696.11 RNL -CD 1010 1696 30665 6126/90 BROS RNDLESALE LI# VENDOR TOTAL 5541.49 1 PREPAID 11,164.98 FIT 6/23 PR 01-2040 -0000 6/30190 6/30/90 11,164.98 JRML -CD 1010 1116A.98 30672 6/28/90 MARK EM BAIT! - NOX VENDOR TOTAL 11164.98 eulV "3101 PRE -PAID 288,00 OF COMP 6/:3 PR 01-2040 -0000 PAM 3 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 6/30/90 w- c- 0 I CITY OF MOIBO TIME 9.09.14 Vim° INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -PAID CHECK N0. INVOICE NM6R DATE DATE STATUS MOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER MW CHECK 4 DA 6/30/90 6/30/90 288.00 JK -CD 1010 '188.00 :06N f./:8. HN IE►iREMENT SYSTEM! VENDOR TOTAL 288.00 Rm PRE -PAID 69.55 POSTO FOR WATER BILLS 73- 7300 - :3'110 69.55 POSTG FOR WATER BILLS 78- 7800 -3110 6/30/9C 6/30/90 139.10 JRML-CD 1010 139.10 30651 6/18/ PRE -PAID 64.93 POSH FOR WATER BILLS 73- 7300 -3210 64.94 POSTO FOR WATER BILLS 78- 7800 -3210 6/30/90 6/30/90 129.87 JRNL-CD 1010 129.87 30662 6122/90 MOUND POSTMASTER _'1MOR TOTAL 268.97 P39S0 PREPAID 6,711.95 PERA 6/23 PR 01- 2040 -0000 6/30/90 6/30/90 6,711.95 JML -CD 1010 6711.05 30674 6/28/90 P E R A VENDOR TOTAL 6711.95 04171 PRE -PAID 1,545.81 LIG 71-7100 -9510 30.91- DISC 71- 7100 -9560 6/30/90 6/30/90 1,514.90 JRNL -CD 1010 1514.90 30657 6/19/90 PRE -PAID 1,570.74 LID 71- 7100 -9510 334.60 WINE 71- 7100-9520 34.79- DISC 71-7100 -9560 6/30/90 6/30/90 1,870.55 JRNL -CD 1010 1570.55 30667 6/16/90 QUALITY MINE i SPIRITS VENDOR TOTAL 3383.45 R4259 PRE -PAID 688.64 64 CONTRACT Hollis 01 -4340 -3100 6130/90 6/30/90 688.64 JK -CD 1010 688.64 30668 6/26/90 ROBERT E JDMN50wl VENDOR TOTAL 688.64 54355 PRE -PAID 29.75 MEAL-C.O.W MTG 01- 4020 -4120 6130/90 6/30/90 29.75 JK -CD 1010 29.75 30658 6/19/90 SCOTTY B'S VENDOR TOTAL 29.75 I6041 PRE -PAID 206.94 REIMIB-MOWER ACCIDENT-PARKS 01-4340 -3810 6/30/90 6/30 /90 206.94 JRNL -CD 1010 206.94 30661 6122/90 PAT FBIMAN VENDOR TOTAL 206.94 16146 PRE -PAID 304.50 WHO'S WHO PLAQUE 01-4140 -4100 6/30/90 6/30/90 304.50 JRML-CD 1010 304.50 30681 6/28/90 *ID'S YD IN LAW EWrf4 E?E VENDOR TOTAL 304.50 • TOTAL ALL VENDORS 41,643.68 o 3 A061 'AGE 1 PURC4ASE JOURNAL ['.ATE 71 :-1 /'�0 AP- 002-01 CITY OF MAID TIME 14.58.5 YOM INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -PAID CWCK INVOICE WO DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DEMPTION ACCUJNT "BER AMOLNT CHECY, 1 DATE 13.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES Ol - :1�Y1 6.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01- 4 0x0 -2110 76.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1)1 -41 - :100 6.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-41 24.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-434n -21(.() 20.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-4:30 -2100 3.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 71- 7100-2101) 83.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 73 -73v0 -:100 3.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 78-7300 -_100 2.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 01-40 -2100 7/10140 7/10/90 241.37 JRNL -CD VV. ACRD-IN VENDOR TOTAL 141.37 40250 70.00 AICPA DUDES 01 40Q0.4130 7/10190 7/10/90 70.00 JRNL - CD 1010 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CPA' VENDOR TOTAL 70.00 A0270 169.00 1ST AID MANUALS 01 2300 - 02. 2 1) 7/10/90 7/10!90 169.90 JRNL-CD 1011) AIDICAN HEART ASSN YEIrDOR TOTAL 169.00 A0 198.01 XEROY PAPER 01 -432 -2100 7/10/90 7/10190 198.01 JRNL-CD 141 ANCIIUU PAPER VENDOR TOTAL 198.01 80600 285.59 CITY DAYS -LOST L4KEGARB PU 01- 4320 -3780 7/10/90 7/10/90 2- '15.59 JRrL -CD 1010 BLACKIUTAK AND SON VENDOR TOTAL 2815,59 80746 600.00 29TR CONIECT,OPER DIGS 01- 4140 -160 1/10/90 7/10/90 600.00 JRtL -CD 1010 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHf VENDOR TOTAL 600.00 0083 53.84 JUNE CELLULAP TELE 01- 4140 -3220 40.:3 JUNE CELLULAR TELE 73- 7300 -?2:0 6.15 JUTE CELLULAR TELE 22- 4170 -322 7/10!90 7/10/90 100.22 JRNL -CD 101 CELLULAR ONE VENDOR TOTAL 100.21 C" 11.57 LID STOFf WATER 71-7100-3140 7/10!90 7/10/90 11.57 JRN - -CD 1010 CO NAND VENDOR TOTAL 11.57 C0938 413.00 FIRE GLOVES 22-4170 -22(x? 7/10/90 7/10/90 413.00 5% -CD 1010 V ` X M MEY'S SAFETY E9UIP INC VENDOR TOTAL. 413.00 00 (, / "a 2 PURCHASE JOURNAL AP-CO2-01 CITY OF MOUND VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD NO. INVOICE NMBR DAFE DATE STATUS AMA NT DESCRIPTION C0 T ..SR JUNE RUG RENT 2`..48 JLq RUG RENT 7110 /�n 7110' "1.16 JRNL - CD CL EAN s UT RE4TAL vENi. _R TOTAL 61.16 C0970 407. ,JUNE M I % 7/10/00 7 /10!')0 4n7.N JRNL - CD COCA COLA BOTTLING-MIDIEST VENDOR TOTAL 407.30 C1100 13.0(1 DUNE COPIER MAINT 7/10/90 7/10/90 13.00 JRNL -CD COPY MRICATING PRODUCTS VENDOR TOTAL. 13.00 C1101 1,40 FIN CHO, T110/�0 7 /1nrSq 1.40 JR* -CD W; it CHARGE CARD %0DOF TOTAL 1.40 C1105 Q?, 7S REPAIR BACK DQOR 7/10/90 7/10/90 `2. JRNL -CD r.RAWFORD DOOR SALES VENTA TO'AL 92.7 D12M 4,37.37 J1JME BEER 710/90 7110 4,327.37 JRNI -CD DAY DISTRIBLITING CO VENDOR TOTAL 4327.37 D1210 4f,. BATTERIES 7/10/90 7/10/90 46.49 ,JRNL -CD DECKER 901Y CD VENDOR TOTAL 46.Q5 D1230 K. GLASSES RE!MB- SCHWkR 7 /10/10 7110/ I+F4 CD OELORIS SCHWALBE VENDOR TOTAL O1' '0 417.1:x, .AJNE CHIE; SALARY 7/10/x1 7/10/90 417.1X1 JRNL -CD DONALD BRYCE VENDOR TOTAL 417.00 D1332 :15.4 CHLORINE ; "1.15 rIUORIDE 7/10/90 7/10/90 34. 5 .Fl -CD OPC INDUSTRIES, INC. VENDOR TOTAL 346.55 D1w 6.75 LP G *1o`3 7/10/ 7/10/ 6.75 JRNL -CD DUA E'S 66 SERVICE VENDOR TOTAL 6.7� DATE 7;10/90 TIME 14.74.57 PRE -PAID CHECK ACCOUNT MJMWR AMOUNT CHECK 4 DAT 01-4'."n-4210 71 •' 1 il(1 -4:10 ;;111 1�t0 1010 73- 73()0-2 'W 1010 :'-4170 -38'* 1010 71- 7190 -9°30 10tH 1010 - "- 417(1 -1 M) 101(; 73- 7.tfM) 2.1 73 7'Un `U 1010 :7 10; �1 W 3 PURCHASE JOURNAL AP- CO2- CITY OF MOUND VENOM INVOICE DUE HOLD 46 INVUICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION E1420 = ,136.05 JUNE BEER .15 M -CD EAST SIDE BEVERAGE VENDOR TOTAL 81 36.0` E1430 2`46.08 AMC CONE -DJ UTH 13.25 ARBITR LUNCH 309.33 JRNL EDWARD 901E VENDOR TOTAL 3(10,33 E1485 26,59 FURN a BELTS 7/10190 7/10/90 26.59 JRNL -CD EQUIPMENT SUPPLY ',NC VENDOR TOTAL 26.59 F1529 r2 r BC43S 7/10-10 7!1C 2'� 2?1 JRNL -CD FALK PAPER COBL'ANY VENDOR TOTAL X2.23 F1690 120.42 JUNE MIX 712'40 7!1r /o( 4^10. -11 330.64 JUNE MISC .JRNI.-CD FOUR STAR BAR SUPPLY VENDOR TOTAL 330.64 F1711 : -9.00 JUNE FREIGHT 7/10/90 71101'40 254,00 JRNL -CD FRANCYS TRUCKING VENDOR TOTAL 25Q.tl0 F1720 104.00 ARBITRATION 7/10100 7/10/9C 104.00 JRNL -CD FRANY MADDEN b AM VENDOR TOTAL 104.00 GIl?n 116.58 JULY RADIO SERV CONTRACT 56.28 ,JUL Y RADIO SERV CONTRACT 12.06 JULY RADIO SERV CONTRACT 12.06 JUL Y RAD SERV CONTRACT 16.38 JULY RADIO SERV CONTRACT 12.06 JULY RADIO SERV CONTRACT 60.30 JULY RADIO SERV CONTRACT 28.14 JULY RADIO SERV CONTRACT 28.14 JUL Y RADIO SEW CONTRACT 77.00 BATTEFY 0 712.00 20.91 UNIDEN MOBILE RADIO CABLE & CONN 7/10/40 7/10/ 1,271.91 JRNL CD GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS VENDOR TOTAL 1271. G19 ?0 258.'3 JJNE MARSHALL SALARY 7/10/90 7/10/90 258.33 JRNL-CD DATE ? 110 /9r TIME 14.`.8.57 PRE - PA I D DIED( ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK i DATE 01-440-4110 01-4040-41,') lOiU 01- 4320-3800 1010 71- 7100 -2-'W 1010 71- 71004*540 71- 7100 -4550 1016 71-7100-9600 1010 01-4399-4100 1010 01-4340-3950 01 - -39`0 01- 4290.3950 01- 4140-39` 01- 4040 -39% 73-7300 -3950 78-7800 -3950 22- 4170-39° 01- 4340 - .''200 01- 4 01-4190 -2310 1010 Ole y 22- 4170-1370 1010 PAVE 4 °URCHASE JOURNAL [ATE 7/10/90 AP- C01-01 CITY OF MOUND TIME 14.58.57 VENDOR INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -PAID CHECK NO. INVOICE NMBR DATE DATE STATUS 49Ol1NT DESCRIPTION ACMT NUMBER AMOLMT CHECY t DATO GERALD BABB 'VENDOR TOTAL 7.8.3? HI 0 Q9 284.98 VANGl1ARD FIXTURE .2- 4170 -383+) 7110/90 7/10/'0 w4.98 JRNL -CD 1010 H 4 H INDUSTRIES, INC VENDOR TOTAL- :$4.98 H-'140 106. 50 MAY BOOKING FEE 01- 4110 -4250 7/10/90 7,/10! 106.50 JRNL-CD 1010 HENN CO SHERIFFS DEPT VENDOR TOTAL 106.50 ►CI60 1,186.86 MAY BOARD 01- 4110-4250 7/10/90 710190 1,186.36 JRNL -CD 1010 HENN CO TREASURER VENDOR TOTAL 1186.86 I-1400 :4.00 BALANCE 134 73- 7300 -4200 168.00 HEATER419 2''- 4170-200 7110/90 7/10/90 1Q2.00 JRNL -CD 1010 ISLAND PAW SKE! LT VENDOR TOTAL 19`'.00 i 6.87 MILEAGE 71-7100 -2200 35.00 GLASSES REIMB-KR" 71- 7100 -4100 7/10/96 7/101" 41.87 JRNL -CD 1010 JOEL M"R1141 VENDOR TOTAL 41.87 1m.50 161.29 FILTER CONES 7 8• %ann -2300 7/10/90 7/10/90 161.29 JRNL -CD 1010 JOHN HENRY FOSTER WVOR TOTAL 161.29 x629 35.00 GLASSES REIMB -CLYNE 71- 7106 -4100 7/10/90 7/10/90 35.00 JRNL -CD 10;0 JULIE CLYNE VENDOR TOTAL 35.00 L2752 69,50 JJNE GASOLINE 22- 4170-2210 7 /10 /on 7/10/90 69.50 JRNL -CD 1010 LABATT'S SPRING PARK SP1)FR VENDOR TOTAL 6Q.50 L2770 4,110.75 3RD INSTALLMNT_LMICD 01 -4020 -4130 7/10/90 7/10/ 4,110.75 ;#L-CD 1010 LAKE WA CONSERVATION D!* VENDOR TOTAL 4110.75 L2812 39.50 INSTALL AXE HANDLE 22 4170-,'100 7/10/90 7/10/90 39.50 JRN -co 1010 LARRY GARDNER VENDOR TOTAL 39.50 A0LS 1.2880 35.00 GLASSES REIMB-HARRELL 01- 4140 -3140 °AG[ S PURCHA5E JOURNAL WE 7/10/0 Ap-m - 11 CITY OF POK TIPC 14,38.37 VENOM IKVICE M HOLD PRE -PAID LICK INVOICE NIA DATE DATE STATUS AMW, OESCRIP'101N ACCT MJMHER Ak,tJNT D4ECY DATF 7/101 7 /10/ 0 0 35.00 ,1RNL -rD LBOAD F ARRELL V YOUR TOTAL 35.0? L2'':'0 0,75 :INE,SPOOL AST 7 1.2'5 STATION SUPPLIES :: 11'0 -2200 7110/°0 7/10/ 21.01 JRNL -CD 1 ^;` LOA', LAAT FORD TRACTOP VENOM TOTAL 21.01 L2 760.07 ',TREE ;f!1OVA1 01 -4 ^, o -`110 675.00 TFic'E PMAL 81 -4350 -5110 1/10/90 7 /i0 / 1,435.00 JRNL -CD 1010 LUTZ TREE SERV VENDOR TOTAL 1435.00 M3030 7,018.75 JUNE BEER 71 71M -'"0 7110.' 7110/00 7,01P.75 R% -rD MARX VII DISTRIBUTQR VENDOR TOTAL 7018.75 83170 31,t66. ,LL' SEWER SERVICE 78 - 7800 -42 ?O 9,476.51 ,LLY SEWER SERVICE 78- 11 -06% 7 /10 / 7/10/ 477.48 - � 21,002.40 ILLY SEWER SIR, ,1i±t -CD IOin. RM YASTE CONTROL CORMI+ ViEWR TOTAL 21002.40 M920 26.12 APPLIES 0142 -22 50 7 /10/00 7/10, 26.12 JX -CD 1010 MIDWEST BOLT & ° Y VE:+ROGR TOTAL 26.12 M328Y 466.35 K*t PANTS,CAAT 22• '0-5000 88.00 800TS,SUSPENDERS :2- 41 -1200 40.95 FIRE EXTINGUISr1ER 22- 4179 -2270 4~2.00 CYLINDERS L -4'71 Xi 7/10/90 7/10/00 1,057.30 JRNL-CD 1010 MN COPUY FIRE & SAFETY VEND% TOTAL 107.30 M3?28 137.00 13 CERTIF -FIRE 19 r.. II 22 -4110 -413+? 7/10107 7/10/90 130.01 JRNL -CD 1010 ,X F f" SERV CERT1F li;ATN 4 V .W TOTAL 130.00 260.00 DIES-MN "IC B0 ASSN 71-7100-41 7 /10 /90 1/,u /90 260.00 JZNL -CD 1010 V ICIPAL BEVERAGE ASSN VENDOR TOTAL 260.00 M3470 44.00 MATER ANAL YSIS 73 '3 r 3100 7/10/90 1/10140 44.;,,, JRNL -CD 1010 © � MN VALLEY TESTING LABORATO VEWJR TOTAL 44.00 PAiE 6 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 7/10/00 AP-00: -01 CITY OF MM TIMF. 14.58,1 YEW INVOICE ME HDJLD PRE - WO CHEC1' NO. I*M,CE MIR DATE DATE STATUS ALIT IESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUM FR AM^I,VT r4Er 4 DATE 090 6, JUNE SALARIES .2- 41 -1?�C- 1, W.00 J1JNE M;NT 22 1-'0 617.50 JADE DRILLS 2_ 4170-I?'?0 1�10r ' 10;� 8.7 - JRW -CD lr.. MOlM FIRE DEPARTMENT Vow TOTAL 8778.75 5,35 J.EY FIRE RELIEF PENSION 0 5- Q`a)f) -14 7/101x1 7/10/90 5,350.00 PNL -CD l n ir , "[1M FIRE RELIEF ASSN MEW TOTAL `3°, 43 639.48 MATFR MUM 73- 7300 -2300 7110/90 7 /10M 639.48 At -CD 1010 NORTH STAR MATERMOI,KS PRD+ VENDOR TOTAL 63 'M-02 5,021.40 JUNE STPEET LIGHTS 7110/x) 7110/9 5,013.40 JRNL - CD llli VRllfgl STATES POP VENDOR TOTAL 90 P4000 236.24 JUNE MIX 71- 7100 -95 7110190 7/101 L °!6._4 ,JF'L -CD 1010 "I-COIA COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL ns,3 ° *Y 2,'56.05 JUNE BEER 71- 7100 -9530 7 /101% 7/10/90 2, Y1& -CD 101!! 0 OWBA GISTRIOUTING CO JEYIDOR TOTAL 2756,0~ R4," 104.6 JUNE GAPI E 1- 4320-37`x` 1 110/90 1f10 /90 104,67 JRNL -CD 4ANDT'S SANITATION VEN'Jt7I TOTAL 104.6 2(K1.(K) JLNE ASST CHIEF SALARY 22-4170_;; 7110/90 7/10/90 2(y).00 JRN -CD - 'Mk r MARSC*'E VENDOR TOTAL '.IV. 00 4200 571.20 JL1E ICE 7 /10 /90 7/10/ 57''1.20 J W -CD lr,l RON'S I:1 COyFANY VENDOR TOTAL 573.20 1x;110 98.35 3.10 HOSP -T KRAUSE 01 -4 ?(, 7/10190 7/10/90 782.07 880. P -10 HOSP -J VRAUSE JRNL-CD O1-42�5(! 151/ MARE WNI)OR TOTAL 880.92 54381 --*" 7110/90 7/101 131,854.,4 131,854.54 PYMT 3 -C HALL ADDTN �o`� JRNL -CD In) PAGE 7 PURrHASE JOURNAL DATE 7`10190 W CO2.01 CIT; OF AM TIME 14.58.57 MEIDOR INVOICE DUE 400 PRE-PAID CHECK JE ICE N4MIBR DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMWR AMOUNT CHECY 4 DATE W I Ulf RS VENDOR TOTAL 1.18`4.54 S4415 1 7 3.00 5: SUBSC'IP -9 EVER �: 4110 -41 c 1:10' 7/10/ 113.00 JRNL- ln;i 9W VEW TOTAL 178.00 54430 3.00 FAX 01- 4340 -2906 14.8` REAM OF PAPER 01- 4:70 -22�) 7/10/ 7/10/90 17.85 JRML -CD 161.) SOTS PRIMTING VEINDOt TOTAL 17.85 54440 7.00 J M CAR WASHES 01- 4280 - 3810 119.00 JUNE CAR MASHES 01- 4140 -3810 7/10/90 7/1090 126.00 JRNL-CD 1011 SPRING PARK CAR MASH VENDOR TOTAL 126.00 54500 1 JV1.c'S 01- 4140 - 2240 134.% 9 4ESSOI 01- 4140 -270 16.95 C& 01- 4140 -2:00 7/10/90 1/10/90 3:6.85 JRNL-:.0 1010 5o'S VE7A]ai TOTAL 326.85 T4716 34.00 TEMP HELP 01-470 -1300 7/10'90 7/10/ 34.00 JRNL -CD 1010 TEIMPORMIES TO 00 VE1Ef4t TOTAL 34.00 T4730 4250 CITI DAYS AD 71-7100 -3500 16.90 LEGAL-COND L% 01-4190 -3510 7/10/90 1110/90 59.40 JRNL -CD 1010 TNf LAW VE14Dt7f1 TO i w. 5 T470 218.40 CEILING TILE 7/10/90 7/10/90 213.40 JP'?--CD THOM SON ''ORR COMPANY VENDOR TOTAL 218.40 T4770 1Q, JJNE BEEP 71- 7!n(1 - 'Jc ? 7/10/ 7/10!90 1 JkNL-C, ,'!! THOW DISTRIBUTING CO VENDOR TOTAL 10947.80 T4780 45.76 TAPES,FI'.M 419(, - :::r, 62.98 CAMERA,F :LM 70- 78(g)- 2:'60 7/10/90 7/10/ 108.74 JRML -CD 10V THRIFTY SNYDER MW N104 WNW TOTAL 1(1$.74 T4 25.00 DUES -MCFOA 01- 404j -c,'fO 7/10/90 7/10/90 25.00 JPaL-CD !nln PAM 8 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 7/10190 AP-02-01 CITY OF MIl<1r1J TIME 14.38.51 VENDOP INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -PAID CHECK NO. INVOICE MIBR DATE DATE STAU AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER MINT CHECK 0 DAff TREASURER -MPFOA VEWOP TOTAL T4 x6.44 SEAL,FRiME,SLEEVES 78 -799 -2300 125.00 REPAIR FRONT HEM 78- 7?00-38!Y' 7/10190 7/10/90 451.44 ,RNL -CD 1010 TR1 -STATE PUMP 6 CUM I VENDOR TOTAL '51.44 U5100 41.17 JUNE TOWELS 01- 4'_90 -22% 64.50 JUNE RULE 01- 4:80 -2200 26.90 JUNE UNIFORMS 01-4280 -2240 17.38 JUME UNIFORMS 01-4290 -2240 44.41 JUNE UNIFORMS 73- 7300 -2240 44.41 BE UNIFIN MS 78 -7800 -2240 8.20 JUTE RATS 22- 4170 -2200 7110/90 7110/40 306.97 JRML -CD 1010 LINU G RENTAL SYSTEM VENDOR TOTAL 306.97 V51 1,430.00 MAY PLAN CONSULT 01- 4190 -3100 7/10/90 7/10/90 1,430.00 JRMI-0 1010 VAS- WARD- STALLINGS VENDOR TOTAL 1430.00 N5430 52.00 PART -PILOT VALVE MJ3 73- 7300 -2300 9 87.16 FIRE HYDRANT 73-7300 -2300 7/10190 7/10/90 1,039.16 JiML -CD 1010 WATER PgDDUCTS COMPANY VEM OR TOTAL 1039.16 1!5440 58.89 PACKING 22 -4170 -2200 7/10/90 7/10/90 7.89 JNL -CD 1010 VATEROIS COMPANY YENDGMM TOTAL 58.89 :155.'0 600.00 89 -90 YGIJTH EMPLOYMENT O1- 4n� -41 "x� 7110/90 7/10190 600.00 JOE-CD 141(+ IESTOWA C@MMMNITY SERVICE VENlDOR TOTAL W. v) rw 170.66 JUNE OARAA(E 014W-1750 7110/90 7110/00 170.66 JRNL -CD 1016 IESTOWA SANITATION VENDOR TOTAL 170.66 W!57% 1.;50.40 JULT RETAINER 01- 411D - %:X 7/10/90 1110/90 1,550.00 , P&-CD 1010 MT- PEARSON- LARSON VENlDOR TOTAL I`.%.00 85150 53.52 PRINC-1012 01- 4320 -5W) '.25 ANT - 1012 01-4��J -b110 amoi 7/10/90 7/10/90 56,77 AIL-CD 1010 XMI CatPWT10N VEIAtMOR TOTAL 56.77 PAM 9 PURCHASE JOURNAL DATE 7/10/90 AP -COQ -01 CITY OF MOUND TIME 14.56.57 Yo= INVOICE DUE HOLD PRE -PAID C1EM INVOICE NMItt DATE DATE STATUS AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK 1 DATE T 100.00 JUNE ASST MARSHALL SALARY 22-4170 -1370 7/10190 7110190 100.00 JRNL -CD Ic10 "Iowa PALM YEW TOTAL 100.00 16074 154.21 REIMN-SOFTMARE-0 ANDERSON 22- 4170 -2201 7/10/90 7/10/90 154.21 JRNL-CD 1010 no N[DERS01 VENDOR TOTAL 154.21 TOTAL ALL VENDORS 240, 766.38 • • $1070 A 0 OA071 w►y W. ... Mourn • M1mhoLa "m PIRN DSXARlfOM FOR MOM'1'E OF DRILLN i XUMT=wm irnm i 11Eom WIRE FI(mmitS Dm Dm mius DRILL MAIN. ?MAL Nouns Am Ea Not= NATN v J. ANDERSEN 6.00 c__AMU& X X 1 2 19.00 30 6.00 18 X X 2 19.00 47 282 D. D= X X 2 19.00 29 6.00 17 4.00 D. UM X X 2 19.00 41 6.50 S. DRYix X X 2 19.00 30 6.00 180.00 X 1 9.50 25 150.00 J. CASEY X X 2 19.00 40 6 00 24).00 S. Cou m X E 1 9.50 23 00 138.00 X 'X ' 2 19.00 1 38 6.00 228.00 S. ERICKSM X X 2 19.00 39 6.00 P. FISK X X 19.00 32 6.00 19 2.00 X X 2 19.00 39 6.00 234,00 X. GLaf X X 2 19.00 40 6.00 240.00 C• fi X 1 9.50 39 X X 2 19.00 32 6.0 19 2.00 6.00 D. LANDSW X X 2 9.00 35 6.00 210.00 X X 2 9.00 31 19] X 2 6.01 M. NE[.90N X X 2 9 00 27 6.00 162.00 D. NICCUM X X 2 9.00 32 6.00 192.00 A. OPUZ X X 2 9.00 27 6,00 162.00 X X 2 9.00 30 6.n0 _G. PALM X X 2 19.00 40 5.00 X X 2 19.00 42 6 252.00 T. PALM X X 2 19.00 28 6.00 G. PEDER90N X X 2 19.00 117 6. DO 102.00 X X 2 19.00 134 6 204, M. SAVAGE X E 1 9.50 151 6.00 K. SIPPRELL X X 2 19.00 22 6 . 0 0 132.00 R. STALLMAN X X 2 131 6.00 _ 186.00 SWENSM E X 1 9.50 34 6.00 204.00 W. SWEN" R . WILLIAMS X X 2 19.00 36 6.00 216.00 T. WILLI X X 2 19.00 21 126.00 6.00 33 32 65 617.50 1161 6994. 82k 80 162h MAINE 1167.00 DRILLS 6 OA071 T HIS LAST TH I MONTH OF nNw. iaan MONTH MONTH Tn naTe TA Rare r� VIE • • 4w • • NO. OF CALLS 53 40 237 177 MOUND - FIRE EMERGENCY 9 6 38 36 13 21 96 67 M'TONKA BEACH - FIRE EMERGENCY 4 0 9 4 0 0 1 1 MINNETRISTA - FIRE EMERGENCY 6 1 17 10 9 3 17 4 ORONO - FIRE EMERGENCY 3 5 19 26 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 SHOREWOOD - FIRE EMERGENCY 0 0 0 0 SPRING PARK - FIRE EMERGENCY 3 1 15 13 5 2 17 12 MUTUAL AID - FIRE _ EMERGENCY 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL FIRE CALLS TOT AL EMERGENCY CALLS 27 26 137 8$ COMMER 2 1 6 8 RESIDE NTIAL g 4 42 38 IN US RIAL 0 0 2 3 GRAS 6 MISCELLANEOUS 10 4 29 23 O 2 3 9 11 F ALSE ALARM' 2 1 10 6 NO. OF HOURS - MOUND FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - MTKA BCH FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - M'TRISTA FIRE EMERGENCY — TOTAL - ORONO FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL - SHOREWOOD FIRE EMERGENCY TOTAL -SP. PARK FIRE EMERGENCY _ TOTAL - MUTUAL AID FIRE EMERGENCY T OTAL TOTAL DRILL HOURS 267 129 1041 678 222 460 1823 1182 489 589 2864 1860 116 0 245 90 0 0 14 11 116 0 259 1G1 13R 2A 6131 345 166 76 373 64 M4 104 774 409 51 137 594 817 51 137 725 886 72 19 418 255 102 46 80 174 65 784 435 27 64 91 0 0 0 0 0 27 64 91 0 162k 1017 932k TOTAL E"ERGEIICY HO URS 490 5 2707 1506 } TOTAL F IRE HOURS 671 377 2790 2185 TOT =; FIPE L EMERGENCY HOURS 1161 959 5497 3691 ",T_LL CHID PECEIVED 0 0 1 4 '.ID GIVEN 1 1 2 0 ow7z Tin Date: G - d ?0 DRILL R E P O R T Tin Pumper Operation Fire Streams i Friction Loss House Burnings Natural i Propane Gas talk i Demonstrations Ladder Evolutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations House Evolutions Nossle i Hose Alliance Inhalator operation Discipline and Team work Critique of Fires Pre- Plaining and Inspections Tools i ]Aappparatus Identifyinq Hand Extinguisher Operation Nearing Protective Clothing Films First ]lid and Rescue operation Use of Self- Contained Masks Note: Hose Training Paid Excused $ Unexcused Q Present, Not paid • Miscellaneous: G - Peke r r. •j 1 , WOO r,'V. VJ C,.#J. -f 7m,'. od cM /o - .A9 -B'S • /}. J. Andersen 2 y G. Anderson J. Babb D. Boyd ���� D. Bryce T-7r S. Bryce YJ -.. D. Carlson � /� J. Casey i N S. Collis .. M. David t- R. Engelhart _Z!// S. Erickson �} P. Fisk Y�L J. Garvais 'CT's I K. Grady P. Henry C. Henderson G. Johnson B. Landsman ��... R. Marschke lix. J. Nafus B. Niccum 4�/ M. Nelson A. Opitz G. Palo M. Pals T. Pals G. Pederson T. Rasmussen M. Savage K. SipIroll R. Sta loan T. Swenson W. Swenson . R. Williams � % w; lI•�Mns D;Wl maRter 3 �1 A073 • Date: ( -/ Y • '90 DRILL R E P O R T Discipline and Teas work Critique of Fires Pre - Plaining and inspections Tools i atom Identi ing Rand isher Operation t d ing Protective Clothing First Aid and Rescue operation Use of self - Contained Masks ZU0 Tin Pumper Operation rire 8treass i Friction Loss House Burnings Natural i Propane Gas talk i Demonstrations Ladder Evo lutions Salvage Operations Radio Operations —'— House Evolutions Nozzle i Hose Alliance inhalator operation Note: se Training Paid Excused X Unexcused Q Present, Not paid Miscellaneous: J. Andersen M. Nelson J a G. Anderson S. Erickson 3!� A. Opits �V J. Babb P. risk � G. Pala xg ,, D. Boyd J. Garvais 7T M. Palm u D. Bryce K. Grady — 7T��, T. Pals S. Bryce P. Henry �/ G. Pederson D. Carlson C. Henderson T. Rasmussen J. Geey G Johnson Ei- M. Savage S. Collins B. . Landsman K Sipproll M. David R. Marschke R. Stallman R. Engelhart3..J. Nafus ,.. T. Swenson Qom.. B. Niccum N. Swenson ��. R. Williams master � 3a Ao7y DATE Sk I Oz 1 990 MOUND FIRE DEPARTMENT • TOTAL MAIMTI'FNANCE FOR MONTH OF -SuNE 90 4 i5 1" 1_ /44 o J. ANDERSEN iC. J. NAFUS .Z G. ANDS SON M. NELSON J. BARB 3 B. NLCCUM �- D. BOYD A. OPITZ D D. BRYCE .2 G. PALM 4 S. BRYCE 3 M. PALM ,Z D. C01SON z T. PALM ' J. CASEY Z G. PEDERSON .Z S. COLLINS T. RASMUSSEN �. M. DAVID ti. SAVAGE .Z� R. FNGIIHART K. SIPPRELL ! S. ERICKSON R. STAL AkN .2- P. FISK T. SWENSON J. GARVAIS I o W. SWENSON O K. GRADY w O R. WILUAMiS C. HENDERSON T. WILLIAMIS 02 _ P. HENRY ~ O G. JOHNSON •Z B. LANDSMAN oL R. MARSCFi10E TOTAL MOMMY HOURS__p �- fit-A) )7S r - � • CIT"i' of MOUND T�01-) FRON: JOHN NORMAN, FINANCE DIRECTOR JULY 2 1990 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL `34' MAYWOOD ROAD M(`,iNC MINNESOTA 55364 RE: JUNE FINANCE REPORT Balance June 1, 1990 FNMA 8.00 $7,267,396 Bought: 8.37 Marquette (225,239) FNMA 8.16 Shearson (245.985) CP 8.20 Marquette Due 7 -31 -90 148,133 CD 8.00 Mound Due 12 -4 -90 150,000 CP 8.27 Dain Due 12 -14 -90 230,725 CP 8.27 Shearson D.e 9 -21 -90 235,086 FNMA 8.45 Dain Due 6 -25 -92 200,000 CD 7.95 Mound Due 6 -28 -91 400,000 FNMA 8.00 Shearson Due 12 -26 -90 201,915 Matured: CD 7.90 Mound (400,000) FNMA 8.00 Marquette (300,000) CP 8.37 Marquette (225,239) FNMA 8.16 Shearson (245.985) Balance June 30, 1990 $7,662,030 1991 BUDGET Work on the 1991 budget began in June. After the May Finance Reports were processed, budget worksheets were distributed to all departments. To comply with "truth -in- taxation" laws, we must complete our budget by the end of August. The County will then mail out taxation notices to all property tax owners. The budget hearings will be held during December, like last year. JN:ls 1 A 01,4 i July 5, 1990 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Geno Hoff Street Supt. SUBJECT: June's Monthly Report I failed to mention in my May report that we were out spraying weeds that are behind the curb and in the retaining walls. • We're using a product called Ranger Herbicide, it'F a chemical used by farmers to control may different kinds of broad -leaf weeds. At first I didn't think it was working, infact I told Ed that I thought the weeds looked better since we sprayed. It took 10 to 12 days for the spray to take hold, it sure looks like its doing the job. We got a number of calls from residents wondering what kind of spraying we're doing. After we explained what we were spraying for and what we were using and that we were being extremely careful they seemed to understand. The weekend of the 2nd we had alut of rain and wind. We had a half dozen trees down on the street right -of -way and clot of brush and leaves on the street. We had some minor flooding because of leaves covering catch basins. We started to clean the basins by hand but after about an hour decided that there was just too much. Ii: some places we had 6" to 8" of debris in the gutters, so we fired up the 2 sweepers and cleaned all of the roads, curb to curb, this took about 7 dabs, but this wasn't the end of it about every 3rd or 4th day we got some more. It seemed like we didn't have any light rain it came down in sheets with a strong wind, thus causing drainage pr()ol CM'S . We hired a backhoe for about 8 hours to help us clean cut some ditches that filled up with debris. Anytime you get 2" to 3" of rain at one time you're going to have some problems, we had 10" in June 107 7 We did some blacktop patching on streets that are scheduled • for sealcoating. We were ready for sealcoating the 7,d of July but when I called to let the contractor knew we were ready he told me to call in 2 weeks and he would see when he could squeeze us in. As you know we have a new sealcoating contractor this year so we lost the priorty we use to have. SIGN We replaced 2 stop, 2 No Parking, I Slow Children, we also put up the Farmers Market signs. CEMETERY WORK Staked out 3 graves and 5 stones. • I] .Zo 78 • C:1TY of MOUND July 5, 1990 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Bergquist Mechanic SUBJECT: June's Garage Report POLICE_DEPT_ This month we changed 5 batte:i'es due inpart to the hot weather. 6 regular services: oil change, grease, etc. 4 wiring problems, 2 sets of brakes and 2 light bar repairs. STREET DEPT." Starter repairs to the loader (battery problems) The 1980 Elgin Sweeper needed a new alternator and service including a new main broom to be ready for seal coating streets. #8 Ford dump - service. We also took our portable arc welder out and made a cage for a storm sewer dove tail. PARKS We installed new blade shafts and bearings in the mower deck of the 727 Howard mower. SEWER_ &_WATER A temperature gauge was installed in the Rockwell sewer clea ing machine. We made a cover and welded in to the well shaft in pumphouse #4. R 5341 MAYWWOOD ROAD MOUND MINNESOTA 55364 16121 472 1155 • • CITYCIL PACKET -'7/10/90 #2 • • 0 July 5, 1990 TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Joyce Nelson Recycling Coordinator SUBJECT: June's Recycling I was very happy with the decision to go with the Rec:yclotto. It will be fun to see how participation will increase. The Recycling Committee also was very happy. As of July 1 all appliances must b, recycled. I have a list of certified recycling appliances places that will be put in the paper to let citizens know. I receive about 2 - 3 calls per day from people intcrested in recycling, how to get started, what to recycle, where to get bins so the interest is still out the e. Tonnage for June was 54.82 tons, part icip,it ion was 44 .?o so � 11 July 5, 1440 T0: Ed ShukIe City ManaK(•r FROM: Jim F,rcklc•r Parks Coordinator SUBJECT: June's Activitv Report YANKS With the record .inoit nt of rains set this month we were busy trying to keep up with the mowing. Also picking up the branches that came down during the storms or were placed on the parks by neighbors. � I • The Parks craw put in the t,mpolrrrV supports on [he deck at the Mound Depot so that it could he used tnr 'Mound City Days. Also the Parks crew wars resper�siblc fc placing all the portable toilets and garhagc cans for r nts. The collection of the garbage was don, through nut the �rl�brAIinn by staff. We filled a 20 yard dumpst r r just I rom t It Al so he 11 c cot ran, c s i gn t c u nn Count v Road 1 5 was i nstal led. There a;r to ht• plant i n 14 s of i h h�, rn,1 1 Colot.rdo spruce to f.)1 I ow :r t iMc will r w KEA(''HF:S The prat It wc rc al I F t up with t }i, l;�•T .rn:i w, 1-9 -1 MoTdav - Friday wc,"d r 1 ran u1 a! I M IA* 1.RY the Amrri, .rn i,, j�i„ h I') .r n, t I I) I rrd f 1 3 for t he (.emct f yV. We I I ",, hav, r,st a l 1, ,! n - 'w p( s nn t Ito corners nt the drIv,wa".. AI„ng with th'' r,•w "IKTI" that were put in last Ma the ,4- 0•!,•l " i�, I""kir1w, ni„• 4081 C With the water level going up due to the rains the dock inspector has been kept very busy. A number of sites that were not rented due to too low water are seeing docks put in and boats added without being registered. TREE — REMOVAL/WEED — REMOV_aL 10 trees were removed from City property and one forced removal from pci property. 19 notices were sent to private property owners for w-ed grass over 12 ". SUMMMER — PLAYGROUND ---------- - - - - -- The summer program has begun and will continue until late July. Everything seems to be going good. Jim Glascoe will be updating me and I will pass that on to vcu. • • • July 5, 1990 P14 �,ND MINNESOTA " TO: TO: Ed Shukle City Manager FROM: Greg Skinner Water & Sewer Supt. SUBJECT: June's Activitv Report WATE i s In June we pumped 26,493,000 gallons of water. There were 9 turn -offs for non - payment. We completed our annual fire hydrant flushing and maintenance. Well #1 has been put back in service and is working fine. We still have not removed the motor from Well #6. This month we dug up and repaired a couple dozen water shut - offs. SEWER DEPT. The Sewer Dept. had 2 sewer back -ups in ,tune. Both of these were on the same day and resulted in damage to property. As of this report one has been denied by the Cities insurance comp,inv. the other is still with the insurance company, other than that we have b� cleaning sewer lines. • ;08,3 . /--- AL 1 I � 1 f I t a' V4'•A,'0 ROAD i I�i 1 V'A 1 • K A ' N I � � '�N, r.! NNESO ?A 55364 July 2, 1990 TO: MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND COUNCIL FROM: JOEL [RUMM, LIQUOR STORE MANAGER RE: JUNE MONTHLY REPORT It's unbelievable but half of the year has come and gone already. Time flies when sales are good. We just had our best month ever, which is incredible since our two most productive months have always been July and December. June sales were $104,561, compared to June 1989 sales of $93,155. For the first half of • the year, sales are $40,323 ahead of the first half of 1989. There was certainly one eventful incident in June worth noting. Our neighbor, the proprietor of the Jock Club (restaurant and lounge) closed his doors and hence has opened up shop again down the road in Spring Park with the intention of buying the old Pizzelli's Restaurant and the Marina Wine and Spirits off sale liquor store. Con.:equently, our landlord has had to do some quick shuffling in order to market and sell the empty space in Shoreline Plaza. Whether or not there is a bar next to us will not affect us. Whether or not there is another and liquor store bordering our city should not affect us either. I had two part time employees who worked for me last summer and during the winter holidays come back this summer, which has really helped with all of the extra business we're doing. Alas, it's too bad they cannot remain with us past Labor Day, but that seems to be the name of the game in retail. JK :ls aosy LEN HARRELL Chief of Police TO: Ed Shukle FROM: Len Harrell SUBJECT: Monthly Report I. STATISTICS MOUND POLICE 5341 Maywood Road Telephone 472 -3711 • Mound, MN 55364 Dispatch 544 -9511 EMERGENCY 911 for June, 1990 The police department responded to 877 calls for serv- ice during the month of June. There were 34 Part I offenses reported. Those offenses included 5 criminal sexual conduct, 6 burglaries, 21 larcenies, 1 vehicle theft, and 1 arson. There were 68 Part II offenses reported. Those of- fenses included 6 child abuse /neglect, 3 forgery /NSF checks, 7 criminal damage to property, 6 narcotics violations, 8 liquor law violations, 13 DWI's, 7 simple assaults, 4 domestics (1 with an assault), 5 harassment, and 9 other offenses. The patrol division issued 147 adult citations and 7 juvenile citations. Parking violations accounted for an additional 26 citations. Warnings were issued to 20 individuals for a variety of violations. There were 2 adult felony arrests. Twenty -seven adults were arrested for misdemeanors and 8 juveniles for mis- demeanors. There were 26 warrant arrests. The department assisted in 7 vehicular accidents, one with injuries. There were 32 medical emergencies and 78 animal complaints. Mound assisted other agencies on 10 occasions in June and requested assistance 7 times. Property valued at $10,006 was stolen and $7,678 was recovered in June. 1 • 4AA5 MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE, 1990 II. INVESTIGATI The investigators worked on 14 child protection cases and 2 criminal sexual conduct cases in June. These 16 cases accounted for 86 hours of investigative time. There have been 39 child protection cases reported through the first 6 months of 1990. In addition, cases involving burglary, arson, narcotics, assault, theft, window peeping, tampering with auto, damage to property, NSF checks, minor consumption, and harassment were investigated. Formal complaints were issued for felony assault and gross misdemeanor DWI's. III. p ersonnel /Staffing The department used approximately 138 hours of over- time during the month of June. Mound City Days ac- counted for 75 hours of overtime and Officer Bostrom is still out from a fractured arm. Officers used 44 hours of comp -time, and earned 63 hours of comp -time. There was 132 hours of vacation, 167 hours of sick time, and 122 hours of holiday time used in June. IV. Tr aining Officers received 16 days of training during the month. The training course included canine and emergency preparedness. Officer Huggett and "Rambo" graduated and are currently working the street. IV. Police Reserves The police reserves donated 465 hours of time during the month of June. They assisted in Mound City Days, Mound graduation party, Plymouth graduation, emergency call outs and working on their reserve booth. • �L r� MOUND POLICE DZPAR21 M CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT Jams, 1990 Assists Follow -Ups Henn. County Child Protection Mutual Aid Given Mutual Aid Requested 44 IRI YEAR TO LAST YEAR G M SAL ACTIVITY S0mmy noUTS DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 92 496 608 Non - Hazardous Citations 34 163 140 Hazardous Warnings 1 54 97 Non - Hazardous Warnings 11 201 182 Verbal Warnings 144 756 684 Parking Citations 26 185 320 DWI 13 51 28 Over .10 10 40 16 Property Damage Accidents 6 32 59 Personal Injury Accidents 1 12 16 Fatal Accidents 0 0 0 Adult Felony Arrests 2 32 18 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 53 225 145 Adult Misdemeanor Citations 13 59 30 Juvenile Felony Arrests 0 32 14 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 8 33 15 Juvenile Misdemeanor Citations 16 27 6 Part I Offenses 34 156 123 Part II Offenses 68 403 29J Medicals 32 158 139 Animal Complaints 78 441 539 Other Public Contacts 639 3,040 3,316 TOTAL 1,281 6,596 6,786 Assists Follow -Ups Henn. County Child Protection Mutual Aid Given Mutual Aid Requested 44 186 309 13 120 168 4 22 25 10 72 99 7 43 48 1 is 4R0V • 6 1 3 im, 1990 Foraary/IIDF Cots 3 1 OFFERSES CLEARED EXCEPT. CLEARED IT ARRESTEO • 0 REPORTED tXFMRM CLEARED ARREST ADULT ANERILE 0 PART t calms Rssicide 0 0 0 a 0 0 6 crisinnat Semust Conduct S 1 3 0 0 0 a 2 bow v 0 0 0 0 0 0 Simile Assault AWaMed Assault 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 amatory 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 LW=FW 21 0 1 1 2 0 0 vehicle Twt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aran 1 0 0 0 0 0 • TOTAL 34 1 4 1 2 0 PART 11 12IRES Child A nn~ect 6 1 3 0 0 0 Foraary/IIDF Cots 3 1 2 0 0 0 Crisirnal Demeae to Property 7 • 0 1 0 1 U I$1 is 0 0 0 0 0 0 merootics 6 0 0 6 3 3 Li4sr Lars a 0 0 a a 2 wl 13 0 0 13 13 0 Simile Assault 7 0 2 1 0 0 Domestic Assault 1 0 0 1 1 0 Domestic (00 Assault) 3 0 0 0 0 0 Daressasnrt S 0 0 0 0 0 ArAnito States Offenses 1 0 1 0 0 0 Public Price 1 0 0 1 1 0 Treapassiry 1 0 0 1 1 0 All Other Offenses 6 0 0 1 0 1 TOTAL 68 2 a 33 27 a PART III i PART IV Poem ty Dump Accidents 6 Tom I Injury Accidents 1 Fatal Accidents 0 "Cots 32 Antesl Complaints 7a Rested Aid 10 Other General investiDstiors 639 TOTAL 766 Nun*in County Chid Protection a Chin 1 TOTAL 877 3 12 34 29 a 1 ;wa MOMTSLY PROPERTY LOSS /RECOVERY SUMKKRY JDME, 1990 Bikes Snowmobiles Boats, Motors, Trailers Clothing Currency, Notes, Etc. Jewelry i Precious Metals Guns Home Furnishings Radio i Electronic Equipment Vehicles i Vehicle Equipment Miscellaneous TOTI►L 1 STOLEN RECOVERED $ 1,254 $ 150 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 600 0 7,553 7.510 520 18 $10,006 $ 7,676 • • C� X061 • MOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JUNE, 1990 CTi'MOMN ADULT DWI 13 0 More than .10% BAC 10 0 Careless/Reckless Driving 6 0 Driving After Susp. or Rev. 4 0 Open Bottle 1 1 Speeding 61 4 No DL or Expired DL 4 1 Restriction on DL 1 0 Improper, Expired, or No Plates 19 1 Illegal Passing 1 0 • Stop Sign Violations 6 0 Failure to Yield 0 0 Equipment Violations 2 0 HiR Leaving the Scene 0 0 No Insurance 1 0 Illegal or Unsafe Turn 0 0 Over the Centerline 0 0 Parking Violations 26 0 Crosswalk 1 0 Dog Ordinances 0 0 Derelict Autos 0 0 Seat Belt 10 0 MV /ATV 2 0 • Miscellaneous Tags I ---Q TOTAL 173 7 6 20 A0 NOUND POLICE DEPARTMUT N01P1 Y REPORT JOKE, 1990 No Insurance 3 1 Traffic 2 1 Equipment 7 3 Crosswalk 0 0 Animals 1 0 Trash /Derelict Autos 0 0 Seat Belt 0 0 Trespassing 0 0 Miscellaneous 2 0 is S AMG T8 Felony Warrants 0 0 Misdemeanor Warrants 26 • • ADI/ ": D- JU11 -90 CFMIO PRNNNIT IIN'S O LT? a &1VITV GOES: ALL ALT ORRE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION ow SPEEDIMG NMI J- SPEEMING Will M 0A. 0011210 D/L AIN J - b D/L. EIIPINED 0/L D9NK ESTRICT® D/L MU TEST ENMSAL 0110011 ILLEGAL PASSING am MC OVER .10 01012 00 MOTTLE J -OPEN MOTTLE am SIGN OM1R EQUIPMENT VIOLATION 010!2 EXNIMITION DRIVING DOM DRIVING ON PARR PROP. 090311 CROSSWALK VIOLATION 09033 NAY /ATV STREETS-PARKS 090N RO SEATMELT OWA ALLOWING INCON PETENT 10 DRIVE 09IN PARKING/ALL OTTER 09150 NO TRAILER PARKING 09200 OAS /DAR/DAC 09210 KATES/80-IMPROPER- EXPIRED 0421) J- PLATES /NO-EXPIRED-INiROPER r I INSTALLATION NAME -- NOIOD POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 E N F O R S CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS MY PATROL AREA OS/26/90 TNRU 06/2S/90 - - - - - - - - - • - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 i0 SO 60 70 MO 90 TOTAL 14 79 10 11 7 61 1 2 1 4 3 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 1 2 1 3 1 1 i 1 1 2 1 10 1 1 6 2 6 1 1 1 10 1 23 3 i 19 1 62 0 f at 5 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 S 1 1 i 11 i i 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 i 3 10 1 1 1 2 1 10 1 1 6 2 6 1 1 1 10 1 23 3 i 19 1 62 0 f at MUM: V -AN-00 INSTALLATION MAZE •- MOULD POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 CFM 1 lots ONLY? 110 E N F 0 R S RCIIVITY CODES: ALL CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 05/26/90 TNRU 06/25/90 ACT - - - - • - - - -- PATROL AREAS - - - - • - - - - - m ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 10 20 30 i0 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 01?20 0 INSURANCE /PROOF OF 1 1 09!01 Lay PERSONS 1 1 09!09 IgUr/RIMMMT 1 1 01011 PO119 ANIIMLS/IIMO NDS 1 ? 3 6 01Sq POD PROPERTY 2 t 3 0 314 FOUND VENIC LES /INPGU RUED 1 1 00670 PERNMRL INJURY ACCIDENTS i I 00650 PRC/ERTV DAMAGE ACCIDENTS 1 1 1 3 00651 RA PRaERTY DAMAGE ACC. 1 1 1 3 01509 RECREATIONAL VENICLE ACC /OTHER 1 1 09561 ON 01 TIE 1 3 6 WM ATTENPTED SUICIDE 1 1 2 Will NEOIC ALS 1 3 8 1 9 22 09731 0ETO1- NEDICALS 3 3 1 7 WM CRISIS INT.- IEDICALS 1 1 1 3 01000 ALL OTNER/UNCLASSIFIEO 1 2 3 01001 DOESTIC/NO ASSAULT 1 2 3 09900 ALL NCCP CASES 1 1 1 5 8 09906 OPEN DOOR/ALARNS 2 1 1 2 6 09913 Cilia 1 1 09920 INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT 1 1 2 09930 RANDQM APPLICATION 1 2 3 09950 INTELLIGENCE 1 1 r � 0113 RUN: 27. 01111-" CFm PMINRRY ISN'S ONLY? NO a IVITY CODES: ALL INSTALLATION NAME -- Wn POLICE DEPARTMENT ENF025 CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS NY PATROL AREA 05/26/90 TNRU 06/2S/90 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION 0111111 WMANTS 01118 mHuAL AID/8 /00 Oi M WPM AID /6600 011D6 M MIAL AID/NARCOTICS 90000 ARRON A53SI ASLT 5- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS MEN- NANDS-ADLT -FAN A53SS ASLT S•INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM-NAMDS-CNLD -ACC A5356 ASLT 5-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NW-NAMOS-CHLO-STR ASSO2 ART S-TNRT DODILY NARN-UN( LEAP -ADLT -ACC B& IIURG 1 -OCC RES NO FRC-N -UN HEAP -UNK ACT SURG i-OCC RES NO FRC -N -UN 1EAP-CON THEFT 8,3434 OURG 3 -UN000 RES NO FRC-O-UNK NEAP -CON THEFT 53494 MG 3 -UMOCC RES NO FRC -U -UNK LEAP -CON THEFT 53960 OURG 3-AT FRC RES -N-UNK NEAP -UMK ACT 94970 OURG 4 -AT FRC RES-D-UNK YEAP-UNK ACT C3211 FORGERY- MS-UTT POSSESS PLACE - CHECK- PERSON DM ORUGS -SNAIL AMOUNT NARIJUMA- POSSESSION 14100 ESC -ON -FLEE AN OFFICER 13060 CRIM AGNST FAWNS-NEGLECT OF A CHILD J2500 TRAFFIC -GM -DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR J3500 TRAF- ACCID - 143 -Du1VE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 14021 CSC 2 IEAP-FEAR GSN-UMK ACT - PARENT -DOER 13-F L4071 CSC 2 1MEAP-UNK ACT - ACQUAINT -UNDER 13-F 0 PAGE 3 - - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 3 1 7 10 5 26 6 6 7 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 6 1 2 2 5 3 1 1 2 7 1 1 1 1 20 If RUN: 27-JUN -90 CFS03 PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO ACTIVITY CODES: ALL INSTALLATION NAME - MOUM POLICE DEPARTMENT ENF02S CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS BY PATROL AREA 05/26190 TNRU 06 /25/90 ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION L7001 CSC 4 -INK ACT-UK ASSAIL-UNDER 13-F N3001 JUVENILE - ALCONOL OFFENDER NOW JUVENILE-CONTROLLED SLDSTANCE M4104 LIQUOR - POSSESSING N4199 LIQUOR - OTHER N5350 RUNAWAY M650' ORUG MRAPMERNALIA-POSSESSION N3060 DISTUB PEACE-NS- CONCEALING IDEwTITT U3190 DISTURB PEACE- MS-HARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 03602 OBSEMITY- NS-INDECENT- EXPOSURE-TO ADULT P3110 PROP DAMAGE-MS- PRIVATE-UNK INTENT P3130 PROP OAMAGE-NS-BUSINESS -UNK INTENT P3310 TRESPASS- MS-PRIVATE-UNK INTENT T2169 THEFT - 5251 - 52500- FE-FRN WATERCRAFT-OTH PROP T4029 TNNEFT -5250 LESS- MS-FRM BUILDING-OTH PROP T4059 TNEFT -5250 LESS-MS-FRM TARDS-OTN PROP T4159 TNEFT-S250 LESS-MS -FRM MOTOR VEHICLE-OTH PROP T4169 THEFT-S250 LESS- MS -FRM WATERCRAFT -0TH PROP U1493 THEFT- FE-BICYCLE -NO MOTOR - 501-2500 t ;_^" TH:.FT -MS -ISSUE WORTHLES CHECK - S2014500 W36 ToEFT-MS-SHOPLIFTING -5250 LESS U3496 THEFT-NS-BICYCLE -NO MOTOR -250 LESS 03496 THEFT- MS- BICYCLE MOTOR -5200 OR LESS PAGE 4 - - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 6 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 4 5 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 7 0 • • szD ?S RUN: 2? -JUN -90 CFSO3 PRIMAR ISO'S ONLY? NO or IVITT CODES: ALL ACT CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION INSTALLATION NAME - NOLNIO POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE S E0F0AS CALLS FOR SERVICE ACTIVITY ANALYSIS IT PATROL AREA 05/26/90 TNRU 06 /25/90 VO100 VEN FRAUD-ON- ODOMETER TAMPERING V1012 UMA PNORIZED USE-FE-OVER 2500-TRUCK -11US 116100 TRAFF -ORIVE UNDER INFUENCE-1NTERCRAFT T3160 CRIN AGNST OOVN-NS- IMPERSONATING AN OFFICER REPORT TOTALS: 1 � u • - - - - - - - - - - - PATROL AREAS - - - - - - - - - - - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 TOTAL 1 I i 1 1 53 62 98 72 86 2 3 6 1� 1 1 2 382 ORo9G Rim: M-JW -90 INSTALLATION NAME HOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 1 0Ff01 •••••• PRINURT ISMS ONLY? 00 E N F 0 R S 91SMIT1ON CODES: All • ACTIVITY CODES: All OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 05 /26/90 TNRU 06 /26/90 /---------- - - - - -- OFFENSES CLEARED ---- ------------ -/ ACTIVITY CODE / OFFENSES ACTUAL .... BY ARREST - - -- By TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED ------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ------------ ADULT ----- JUVENILE ---- ---------- EXCEPTION --------------------------- CLEARED CLEARED A5351 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 ASLT S-INFLICTS ATTEMPTS M- NANDS-ADLT -FAN A5355 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 ASLT S- INFLICTS ATTENPTS ARM- NANDS-CNLD-ACD A5356 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 ASLT S- INFLICTS ATTEMPTS NRM-NANDS-CNLD -STR ASS02 3 0 3 1 0 0 2 2 66.6 ASLT 5 -TNRT 90DILY NARN-UNNK LEAP- ADLT -ACO 91260 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 DAG 1 -OCC RES NO FRC-N -UN LEAP -UNK ACT 91264 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 BURG 1 -OCC RES NO FRC -N -UN NEAP -CON THEFT 93434 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 BURG 3-UNoCN. RES NO FRC-D-UNI 1EAP-COM THEFT 93494 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 KING 3-UNOCC RES NO FRC -U -LW 1EAP-CON THEFT 93960 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 BURG 3-AT FRC RES-N-UNK 1EAP -UNK ACT 94930 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 NUM 4 -AT Ka. RES-D -MLLE LEAP -UNK ACT 03211 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 FORGERT- !NS-UTT POSSESS PLACE -CNECK -PERSON 09500 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 DRUGS -SMALL AMOUNT MARIJUANA - POSSESSION [4700 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 ESC -GN -FLEE AN OFFICER 13060 6 1 5 2 0 0 3 3 60.0 GRIN AGNST FAWNS-NEGLECT Of A CHILD J2500 5 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 100.0 TRAFFIC-GIN -DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIQUOR 0 2017 RUN: ZB-JUN-90 INSTALLATION MAZE - NOLRD POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 2 OFF01 •s••• PRIMARY ISN'i ONLY? NO E N F 0 R S ITION CODES: ALL lVITY CODES: All OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION 6210: ALL 05 /26/90 THRU 06 /26/90 /----------- -- --- OFFENSES CLEARED ------------ -----/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL ----BY ARREST - - -- BY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFENSES PENDING ADULT --- -------- JUVENILE EXCEPTION ---------- ---- ---- -- CLEARED ------------------- CLEARED J35M 7 0 7 0 7 0 0 7 100.0 TRAF- ACCID-MS-DRIVE UNDER INFLUENCE OF LIDUOR L4021 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 CSC 2 1EA1 GIN-UNK ACT - PARENT -UNDER 13-F L4071 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 CSC 2 LEAP -UK ACT- AMIAINT-UNDER 13-F L'001 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 CSC 4-UK ACT-UNC ASSAIL -UNDER 13-F NMI 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 JUVENILE- ALCONOL OFFENDER x002 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 100.0 JUVENILE-CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 - POSSESSING M4199 6 0 e 0 5 1 0 6 100.0 LIQUOR - OTHER N5350 1 0 1 0 0 0 i 1 100.0 RUNAWAY NMI 4 0 4 0 2 2 0 4 100.0 DRUG PARAPHERNALIA- POSSESSION N3060 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 DISTURB PEACE-MS-CONCEALING IDENTITY N3190 S 0 S 5 0 0 0 0 .0 DISTURB PEACE -MS -NARRASSING COMMUNICATIONS 03602 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 50.0 OBSENITY- MS-INDECENT- EXPOSURE -TO ADULT P3110 5 0 S 4 0 1 0 1 20.0 PROP DAMAGE -MS-PRIVATE -UIK INTENT P3130 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 PROP DAMAGE-MS-BUSINESS-UNK INTENT F_ L J 2095 mum. 21.E -40 INSTALLATION NAME - MDIRID POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 PRIMARY ISN'S ONLY? NO OIWUITION CODES: ALL E N F 0 R S • ACTIVITY CODES: ALL OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION GRID: ALL 05/26/90 THOU 06 /26/90 /------------ ---- OFFENSES CLEARED ------ -----------/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTUAL --- -RY ARREST -- -- By TOTAL PENCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED WOUNDED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED P3310 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 TRESMASi-MS- PRIVATE -UNC INTENT T210 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT- 1231- S2500-FE-FO VATERWFT - OTN PROP T4029 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 THEF1-11230 LESS-IIS-FRM WILDING PROP T4059 3 0 3 2 0 0 1 1 33.3 TNEFT - 5250 LESS-MS-FRM YARDS-011 PROP 1`4194 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT -1250 LESS -MS-FO MOTOR VENICLE-OTN PROP T410 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 .0 TNEFT - 11250 LESS -NS -FAN WATERCRAFT-OTN PROP U1493 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 THEFT-FE-BICYCLE-00 NOTOR -501 -2500 My 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 100.0 THEFT- 0-ISSUE 110RTNLES CHECK -11201 -11500 u3m 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 TNEFT-1111S-SNOPLIFTING460 LESS 03496 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 THEFT- 1101- DICYCLE-NO NOTOR-250 LESS X911 7 0 7 6 0 0 1 1 14.2 TNEFT-0-111 CYCLE -NO MOTOR -5200 OR LESS V0100 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 VEN FRAUD•OI-ODOMETER TAMPERING VIM 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 .0 UIIAUTNONIZED USE-FE-OVER 2500 - TRUCK -WS X6100 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 100.0 TRAFF -ORIVE UNDER INFLUENCE-dATERCRAFT Y3160 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 .0 CRIM AGNST GOVN•MS-IMPERSONATING AN OFFICER tit i 010 4� DIRT: WAN-90 INSTALLATION MAZE - NOUND POLICE DEPARTMENT PAGE A PRIME lot$ ONLY? ND E M F 0 1 S TIN COKS: All IVITT CODES: All OFFENSE ACTIVITY BY DISPOSITION WID: All OS /26/90 TNRU 06 /26/90 /- ---- ---- --- - --- OFFEMSES WWI) ------ ------ - - - - -/ ACTIVITY CODE/ OFFENSES ACTIMI ----DY ARREST- - -- DY TOTAL PERCENT DESCRIPTION REPORTED UNFOUNDED OFFENSES PENDING ADULT JUVENILE EXCEPTION CLEARED CLEARED --------------•-------------------------------------------------------------------------..----------- ------------------------------- MMT TOTALS - 95 3 92 46 26 8 12 i6 50.0 • aloo WOUND POLICE RESERVES NONTNLY NOUNS JUNE, 1990 BADGE B 1 4 S 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 23 26 56 59 57 ce 59 TOTAL DETAILS EVER RES. C/0 SQUAD 8.0 6.5 4.5 2.0 6.5 - 5.5 2.0 S.S 6.S 6.5 CONN N/F TRAIN INSTR RIDE SERV NALL ING TION ALONG ADNIN 67.0 - - 10.5 22.0 52.5 - - - 8.0 3.5 17.5 - - 4.0 35.5 - - 18.5 17.0 - - 3.5 16.0 - - - 18.5 - 35.5 - - 43.0 - - 11.0 23.0 - - 45.0 8.5 325.5 0 NONTNLY ACTIVITIES Emergency Call Outs Mound City Days Nound Graduation Party Plymouth Graduation Building police reserve booth Transports MEET ING 1.0 1.0 .5 1.0 1.0 1.0 TOTAL 115.0 71.5 28.0 0 54.5 C 27.0 17.0 2O.S 0 0 42.0 60 2 0 0 44.5 36.5 5.5 465.5 R1 Nelson 24 Fleming R5 Fox R10 Swanson R11 Romain R12 Shell R13 Larson R14 Zuccaro in Training K. Larson R16 Hawks R17 Kohmen R23 Vogel R28 Geyen R56 Fox, K. R59 Jaiowski s Ah 0 / 1 C7 MOUND POLICE RESERVES SEVEREMCE ACCOUNTS JUNE, 1990 • • OFFICER DEPOSIT BALANCE Butch Narks S 6.SO S«0.50 Ruth Vogel 0 498.50 Steve Kohman 0 104.00 Sherry 2uccaro 6.SO 169.00 Dave Matson 19.50 317.00 John Ros +sin 0 149.00 Jeff Fleming 19.50 227.50 Nakiko Swanson 0 6.50 Tom Geyen 13.00 91.00 Jim Fox 13.00 143.00 Damian Shell 0 39.00 Katie Fox 13.00 175.50 Richard Jazowski 19.50 19.50 TOTALS 5110.50 52,380.50 DM /sh ►a AN& C CITY OF NNW 5341 Ntyrood Road Ibund. MN 55364 8MMMB ACw4m 6 po" use ad Jun rr 190 (includes City Hall addition) Ir L-1 -0 • A103 •�� •er 3 3 �' 308 900 M er 8 1Ir/. 797,385 a ear. a TOW hay lMr 3 3 308.900 8 797.385 . Warr a air a *MOA * TOW Me+�easy == ORML . &anemise avmgmwwm F a rerraere. ♦ e,ir w • w r a T � a w � � 1Q � w. � w.,er MAO M t'"ANN" "°"' •''a'•c'+m decks �r ewu r 7 3 .' 3 W."M 142,:00 18.900 5.364 M•arft 17 14 18 I wrnr 279, 78.689 40, 424 • • O " Tedweeaeeea =6 KTEIYt�T� N WA~ am 1 25 OWEM & 19 268 185.832 wrwW t 53 103 5.000 173,739 5 2. a W serer e c«...w ee•• 9 114 5 a • . o.w church/ ubli F494.732 s " " Oftme ~'""" 12 787.749 To�"TTi CONV[11agNs .. •er rcrr.wr �` 28 .er,r 12 2,167,141 r�.r : M...w�, rr are erw,. •• or. w�..r 1 TaM cW"We one Wh OLMONe I N +• o" wr On..�M � bwewrr 1 •IM 1 Yew OOralerM MAW& iNSr(CT*"& M 1•r rw.ir r•el 28 M rw.r rM w eve 123 •rover w.e�we f•r r•M � r e.r 2 1 nr rrr �,r r Ow fences/walls 4 20 04 a 7 34 r.rrar e.." 0 1 eve 4 25 • 5 14 1 `M lM1 roTM► 49 136 (includes City Hall addition) Ir L-1 -0 • A103 • July 3, 1990 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: CITY CLERK RE: JUNE MONTHLY REPORT There were 2 regular Council Meetings in June. Packet preparation was done for each of these meetings. Minutes were prepared after each meeting. There were follow -up items from each meeting. June was a very busy month for me. Mound City Days took up part of my time the first two weeks. I think we're made more progress • in developing some civic pride in our community from the comments after the weekend. I am starting to work on the fall elections. I updated the election judge letter and put the label list together for the people who have worked in the past. Business Records Corporation was out last week to do the preventive maintenance on the Optec III -P machines. I tested all the lithium batteries in the prom packs of these machines to make sure they are still have the required power. There were two election meetings in June. One with Hennepin County and the other with the Secretary of State's office. I attended the League of Minnesota Cities Elections & Ethics meetinv_ in Duluth. This meeting was the first of three or four to prepare for the upcoming legislative session in the fall. There were the usual calls from residents and questions from the general public on property and other various issues. fc 1 01 toy ^tEl►v� • M � LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT TpN VA 40 EAST LAKE STREET WAYZATA MINNESOTA 55391 TELEPHONE 61214'n7033 EUGENE R. STROMMEN. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD YEUKRS J nE nr„ L """ Ch. "' Orono TY TO: MOUND CI COUNCIL DATE: my 9, 1990 Thomas Reese V,,.- Ch.- Jan B Sr, r.Har M s— V F REPRESENTATIVE TOM REESE, LMCD REPRESENTATI M.nnetonka d.•.0 n Mark Westluntl Trr....ur... Wayzata SUBJECT: JUNE REPORT - LMCD Marv,n Btonm Tonka Bay DA Cochran Greenwootl Alba" ° Stec 1. GENERAL INTEREST ITEMS, Deeph _ James N Grath -1 E ■celsror Ron Kraemer 1.1 Eurnsion Watermilfoil Task For = $pnng Par John Lawman The harvesting program remains about two weeks behind Minnetnsla G Mal,nka schedule. This is attributed to several lost days due to rain and John o -a wind, and to what is hopefully an abnormal number of Robert Ilsb r Mmnetonka equipment breakdowns. The warranty period having largely Robert Rascop Shorewood expired. we are having to locate and train our own local Robert E Slocum resources to maintain and repair the units. Wood artlt The weed mats are so dense that the harvesters at times have difficulty moving through them and processing the cut weeds through the onboard conveyor system. 1.2. The plan has been circulated and comments have been received. Approximately S of the cities have taken stands which could be described as opposing the plan. The remaining cities support the plan to varying degrees. Other oversight and peer agencies generally support the plan. Any of their contrary views tend to be on the opposite side of the issues from the dissenting cities. A series of meetings of the Advisory Committee have been scheduled to review responses to the comments. While the comments appear to be great in number, they are largely repetitive and deal with a relatively small quantity of issues. Another number of comments arise out of an imperfect understanding of the plan, which are easily answered. Again, I am grateful for the thoughtful, informed response from the Mound Council. 1.3 Other General Int Items_ By a vote of 10 to 4 the board has approved a relaxation of the water ski observer rule. Recognizing the fact that the lake is largely unpopulated during the week, the board voted to revise the ordinance to allow for skiing with only a mirror, providing one of the occupants is an adult, Monday through noon on • • Fridays. This should have the effect of encouraging skiers to use the lake during its least busy times. Work is progressing on an interagency 'understanding' on the rules for dredging on the lake. I believe that the LMCD board, which presently only reviews and comments, would like to see some rule changes made along the lines of a single depth to which dredging would be allowed, and for a better compliance inspection system for all dredging. The new Personal Water Craft ordinance seems to be working quite well. I know from personal observation that the prolonged operation provision seems to be working in Cook's Bay. We are informed that 1991 models will have engines with noise levels in the lower 70's decibel range. (And they told us it couldn't be done!) I feel that the LMCD led the way for the rest of the state in dealing with this potentially large nuisance. 2.0 CITY SPECIFIC ITEMS _ MOUND None tom Rrese Mound Representative Lake Minnetonka Conservation District TR:mac cc. Gene Strommen • 2 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473 -7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE July 1990 an JUL 2 MO Saturday 4 Independence Day Holiday, LMCD office closed Wednesday 11 Advisory Committee, Management Plan 7 :00 pm Tonka Bay City Hall Saturday 14 Water Structures 6 Environment Committee 7:30 am Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Monday 16 Lake Use Committee 4:30 pm Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road • Wednesday 18 Advisory Committee, Management Plan 7:00 pm Tonka Bay City Hall Friday 20 Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force 8:30 am Freshwater Foundation Navarre Wednesday 25 LMCD Board of Director's Regular Meeting 7:30 pm Tonka Bay City Hall 6 -29 -90 • A16S LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 0 AGENDA 7:30 am, Saturday, July 14, 1990 Shorewood City Hall REC'O J L 10 i9go 5755 Country Club Road *Please note change of location* 1. Wayzata Yacht Club District Mooring Field temporary low water variance application to relocate 3 moorings from Site 1 to Site 2 to reduce the impact of the 800' extension on Site 1, to include internal mooring relocations within Site 1. 2. Village of Deephaven Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) findings of fact and conclusions (draft pending final comments allowed through 7/11/90). 3. Special Density License ordinance amendment as prepared by Attorney LeFevere amending LMCD code Sec. 2.05, Subd. 4b relating to public amenities. 4. Dock license renewals for the Crystal Bay Service, Crystal Bay, Orono and Harrison Harbor, Harrison Bay, Mound, Harrison Harbor being back licensed for 1989, including late fees for both renewals. 5. Chaff. Grathwol explorations for continuing the committee plans on its priority items study. 6. Additional items recommended by the committee; ENVIRONMENT 1. Weed harvest progress report through 7/6/90 and interim update for the current work week (7/9 -13); 2. Equipment performance review and its affect on operations; 3. Overview of the operations to date; is LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT . ADVISORY COfM1ITTEE Meeting Notice {next two meetings } KrDJUL 2 7:00 pm, Wednesday, July 11, 1990 7:00 pm, n ^ 18, Tonka Bay City Hall Review of the responses prepared by Consultant David Arndorfer to the Long Term Management Program public comment got of to a thoughtful start June 28• The cities of Woodland and Wayzata received in -depth review. It has become apparent that the extent of the response evaluation is going to take some time. For that reason the above TWO meetings have been scheduled, and likely additional meetings will be necessary. It is anticipated that all reviews can be made in time to still meet the August target for evaluating the public comment and making any needed • adjustments in the Program. The meeting July 11 will be dedicated in the main to the City of Orono response. Arndorfer is revising the initial comment which was circulated to the LMCD Bo &rd June 27• Board members are encouraged to read the revised copy which should arrive by Thursday, July 7• Advisory Committee members OTHER THAN LMCD board members, are asked to call the LMCD offices to advise IF YOU WANT copies of the Arndorfer response to the public comment. Because the copy is running into large volume of pages fover.70 for the initial replies}, for practical matters of material and postage, it is intended to send it only to those who expect to read the material and attend Advisory Committee to comment on it. Recommended changes will be communicated to all Advisory Committee members upon completion of the comment review for those who prefer not to or are unable to keep up with the review process these next several weeks. • $2104 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473 -7033 L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE July 1990 RECD J U N 2 9 1yyU Saturday 4 Independence Day Holiday, LMCD office closed Saturday 14 Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m. Shorewood City Hall 5755 Country Club Road Monday 16 Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m. Shorewood City hall 5755 Country Cl�:b Road Wednesday 18 Advisory Committee, Management Plan 7:00 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall Friday 20 Eurasian Water Milfoil Task Force • 8:30 a.m. Freshwater Foundation Navarre Wednesday 25 LMCD Board of Director's Regular Meeting 7:30 p.m. Tonka Bay City Hall 6 -28 -90 • RIo7 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 473 -7033 • E VENT S S C H E D U L E F CO JUN 2 9 IM July 1990 Saturdays 10:00 an Yacht Club Races - Lower Lake 2:00 pa to It If to of (except 7/14) 2:00 pm of to to - Upper Lake (except 7/14) Sundays 10:00 as Yacht Club ;faces - Lower Lake 10:30 m to It - Upper Lake 1:30 pm of to of - Lower Lake (2:00 on 718. 1:00 on 7/15) Mondays 6:30 pm R -Boat Sailing Races - Lower Lake (ending 7/9) Tuesdays 6:00 pm Yacht Club Races - Lower Lake (6:30 on 7/24) Wednesdays 5:30 pm Wednesday Night Bass Tournement - Goose Island 6:00 pm Yacht Club Races - Lower Lake (beginning on 7/11 at 6:30) 6:30 pm of of of - Upper Lake (beginning 7/11) Thursday 6:15 pm Yacht Club Races - Lower Lake 0 6 -28-90 A108 6 -28 -90 • OTHER SCHEDULED EVENTS • Wednesday 4 10:00 am Yacht Club Races - Lower Lake 10:30 an of of of - Upper Lake dusk Wayzata Chamber of Commerce Fireworks - Wayzata Bay July 5-8 all day U.S. Olympic Festival Yachting Practice - Lower Lake Friday 6 6:00 pm R -Boat Sailing Race - Lower Lake Saturday 7 10:00 an Yacht Club Races (WYC) - Big Island 11:00 am Yacht Club Races (SYC) - " " July 9 -12 10:00 an U.S. Olympic Festival Yachting Regatta - Lower Lake Thursday 12 11:30 pm I -Boat Sailing Race - Big Island Friday 13 10:00 am Yacht Club Regatta, Aquatr_nial Cup - Lower Lake 1:00 pm it n to of of 3:00 pm of " of to �� u Saturday 14 9:00 an Yacht Club Regatta, Aquatenial Cup - Lower Lake 10:00 am to to is to of of 1:00 p m of of is of of of Sunday 15 12:00 pm Zurah Shrine Skippers boat Parade - Excelsior Bay • Monday 16 9:30 am J -22 Sailing Regatta - Lower Lake Tuesday 17 9:30 am J -22 Sailing Regatta - Lower Lake Friday 20 6:30 pm Yacht Club Race - Smithtown Bay Saturday 21 7:00 am Lake Master Swim Club's Challenge - Excesior to Wayzata 10:OU an Yacht Club Races (WYC) - Big Island July 23 -26 10:00 am M -20 Sailboat Nationals - Lower Lake 2:00 pm of of n Friday 27 6:30 pm E and I Sailboat Races (MYC) - Lower Lake July 28 -29 6:30 am MN /WI Pro -am Bass Tournement - Lakeside Marina Saturday 28 11:00 am Yacht Club Races (SYC) - Big Island 6 -28 -90 • LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT • Action Report: Lake Use Committee RECD JUN 2 910 • • Meeting: Monday, June 18, 1990, 4:30 p.m. LMCD Office, Wayzata Members Present: Robert Pillsbury, Chair, Minnetonka; Marvin Bjorlin, Tonka Bay; David Cochran, Greenwood; Bert Foster, Deephaven; James Grathwol, Excelsior; Thomas Reese, Mound. Also present: Deputy Ken Schilling, Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol; Eugene Stiommen, Executive Director. The meeting was called to order by Chair Pillsbury at 4:30 p.m. public information. 1. Personal Watercraft Ordinance - Publication Date The Executive Director reported the Personal Watercraft Ordinance has been published and is in effect as of June 14, 1990. Newspapers have been furnished with a press release for 2. City Of Wayzata - Special Event Permit - July 4 Fireworks The Wayzata Chamber of Commerce has made application for a Special Event Permit for a fire works display on July 4. Mitzi Witchger, Chamber Executive Director, Duane Marshall, fireworks program Chair and Brad Anderson, Northern Pyrotechnics, were present to explain the application. Marshall said the fireworks will be discharged from barges located in Wayzata Bay. National codes governing fireworks' displays require a clear area of 840 feet in all directions from the discharge point. They will place 50 to 100 temporary buoys 1000 feet from the center of the barges. Deputy Schilling said the Hater Patrol will control the perimeter. He said the program will eliminate traffic in and out of Minnetonka Boat Works and Sunsets. Debbie Hork, North Shore Drive Marina, voiced problems with debris fall -out on watercraft at the recent Mound City Days fireworks display. Deputy Schilling will follow up on her comments. Reese observed there was no reported damage. Foster moved, Cochran seconded, to recommend approval of a Special Evert Permit to allow the Wayzata Chamber of Commerce to present _t fireworks display in Wayzata Bay on July 4. The logistics and details are to be worked out with the LMCD staff and the Water ;patrol and the permit subject to applicable laws of other governing agencies. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Critique of June 9 Water Structures /Lake Environment Inspection. Nineteen of the twenty scheduled stops were made, Chair Pillsbury reported. The channel buoy at the Minnetonka Power Squadron has been moved further out as a result of the inspection. Grathwol said he thought it was a good tour. It gave him an opportunity to view the marinas with docks between 100' and 200' and his ob- ervation is they are in conformance. He - continued A llo Lake Use Committee June 18, 1990 also noted a variety of vegetation in the water and would like to see an identification of areas containing these plants so their benefits can be preserved. 4. Summer Olympic Festival Report Foster reported on the Summer Olympic Festival plans for yachting and sailboard races scheduled for July 8- 12, sponsored by the Minnetonka and Wayzata Yacht Clubs. The Water Patrol will handle the water traffic control. Foster was assured the Diamond Point reef will be harvested for Eurasian Water Milfoil prior to the event. 5. Charter Boat Rei The Executive for charter boats &Alma's XII,Choral Minnetonka, Silver Charters (Excelsior mewal Applications Director reported have been receive "C .. , Godfather Lining (Greenwood dock), latter due the following applications I in the last 30 days: Al II, Godfather III, Miss Marina), and Excelsior Bay in this week. 6. Underwater Found Obstructions siting and buoy placement The Executive Director reported the UFO buoys have not yet been placed. Re- locating the spots reported to the LMCD by the public is a problem being worked out by volunteer in charge, Dick Spellman. 7. Special Event Deposit Refund • Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend refund of the Special Event deposit to James McNamee, Westonka M.D.A. fishing contest, held May 26, no incl-.dents reported. Motion carried unanimously. Foster moved, Grathwol seconded, to recommend refund of the Special Event deposit to Lord Fletcher's for the canoe race application denied by the Board. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Water Patrol Report a. Citation incidents: Deputy Schilling reported an increase in citations for this year,data being assembled. Eighteen BWIs have been issued to date. b. Lake Use: Good weather days show a high lake use. c. Water Levels: The water level is reported at 926.57' as of recent heavy rain through 6/18. This compared to the Ordinary High Water Level of 929.4' and 928.6', the Gray's Bay dam level. There followed a discussion of what figure should be used when giving public information. Cochran explained that at 928.6' the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will begin a slow release of water. Foster moved, Bjorlin seconded, to recommend the Water Patrol use the 928.6' figure in determining how far down the water level is at a given date. Motion carried unanimously. c. Charter Boats: Pillsbury raised the question of liquor law enforcement by the Water Patrol. Deputy Schilling said he is not usually involved in that activity but does not believe the continued X111 2 Lake Use Committee June 18, 1990 Water Patrol is totally knowledgeable about the type of license held. Debbie Hork, North Shore Drive Marina, said she does not serve liquor or set ups but in some cases a caterer will display a liquor license. 9. Request Regarding an Observer While Water Skiing The Committee received a request from Brad Rognrud, Cary Manson and other Lake Minnetonka Water Skiers requesting reconsideration of the water ski rule requiring an observer on the boat. The observer would not be required under the following conditions: 1) A curved wide -angle mirror is mounted in the boat for viewing of the skier by the driver. 2) Boat driver follow basic safety guidelines. 3) Only allowed during low boat traffic times, Monday through Thursday, Friday before 1:00 p.m., Saturday, Sunday and holidays before 11:00 a.m. The Executive Director reported Charles LeFevere, LMCD Counsel, advises a motion by any Board member to rescind the May Board action is necessary to reconsider the item. Foster would support Board action to rescind its action and a code amendment to allow non -peak time water skiing without an observer. Reese said he believes the Water Patrol would support • the contention that there is not a safety problem. Foster moved, Reese seconded, to direct the staff to put a motion to rescind the previous action on the agenda for the June 27 Board meeting and to develop a water ski observer rule modification under certain low lake use conditions, including a requirement that the operator be an adult, 18 years of age. Motion carried unanimously. 10. Personal Watercraft Information & Education Program Request The Executive Director submitted a request from Gary Johnson, Kawasaki Jet Ski, proposing an all-day information and education program to promote safe and responsible use of personal watercraft. Four metro -area Kawasaki Jet Ski dealers would sponsor the activity. There was discussion as to the activity being a sales promotion by one brand to promote their product. There were questions raised about a continuous operation in a single area under control of one operator being a violation of the Prolonged Operation section of the Personal Watercraft Ordinance. Cochran moved, Reese seconded, to recommend the request from Kawasaki Jet Ski be denied. Motion carried, Bjorlin voting nay. 11. Charter Boat Roster The Executive Director submitted the 1990 roster of charter boats on Lake Minnetonka. • Grathwol was excused. 3 A / /fit Lake Use Committee June 18, 1990 12. Su■r Rules. • The Executive Director submitted a proof of the Rules of the Road for Lake Minnetonka. Members were asked to proof read it and note any errors or suggest changes. Printing could be held up until after the Board meeting if any change is made in the water ski observer rules. (An interim set is being printed since the supply is exhausted, with a priority on new personal watercraft rules, and the July 4th holiday week at hand.) 12. Adjournment Bjorlin moved, Foster seconded, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. FOR THE COMMITTEE: Eugene Strommen, Executive Director Robert Pillsbury, Chair • • 20131 F1 c • MAKE K! CONSERVATION DISTRICT EAi r STT ETO M Xam. M"*9M s63s1 TELEPHONE 61211737033 9UQ ME R. aTROMMEM. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ET JUN a9 690 "' d1k June 28, 1990 CVia CMM r 1 " 061JAR ATIOM DIMICT )MICIPALITIES Yom' ftiis pleased to e Minnetonka Conse�rnation District budget. It has bs eartified by the LMCD Board of Directors at its regular meeting Jwe6 2I 1090. Revenue projections show decreases in Court Pines for 1991, reviewing forecasts based upon 1990 experience. Boating While Intoxicated citations tend to produce less revenue and more prosecuting costs. Licenses and permits will fall back to 1989 levels due to the morato- rim in force through 1 -31 -92 on new dock licenses. Increases projected for 1990 will not materialize due to the moratorium. Shore - land Rules grant addition reflects the LMCD responsibility on facili- tating the lake municipalities shoreland rules adoption process through 7- 31 -91. Budget expenses reflect a strengthening of staff through the addition of a full time administrative technician position which is effective in July 1 990 as budgeted, and carried forward for a full year in 1991. Professional /Contract Services are similarly reduced reflecting con - tract savings with the new administrative technician position. Office lease expenses reflect a provision for a new office lease in anticipated larger quarters. Consulting services for the long -term management program will be complete. Public information budget is being reduced, shifting a portion of that reliance to the non-profit "Save the Lake" funding potential. A contingency of $10,000 represents three (3) per cent of the budget, viewed as exceptionally modest. Eurasian water milfoil weed harvesting obligations are continued at the 1990 level of $63,000, considering 5% for inflation. Your Board representative, Chair Dave Cochran, and the Executive Director will welcome discussion of this 1991 budget. Your advance invitation to do so is encouraged. is I a 1 � (continued) 0 1,11y weewe K. P*Mmwv wean: eswns wM»w e. eloalrn a LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT LMCD Municipalities June 28, 1990 . Page 2 Minnesota Statute Chapter 907, Section 4, provides: "Expense of the district shall be borne by the municipalities. The portion of the expenses borne by each municipality shall be in proportion to its assessed valuation." Section 5 provides: The board of directors of the district shall on or before July 1 of each year, prepare a detailed budget of its need for the next calendar year and certify the budget on that date to the governing body of each municipality in the district together with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each municipality. The governing body of each municipality in the district shall review the budget, and the directors, upon notice from any municipality, shall hear obje,tions to the budget and may, after the hearing, modify or amend the budget, and then give notice to the municipalities of modifications or amei.9ments. It shall be the duty of the governing body or board of supervi- sors of each municipality in the district to provide the funds necessary to meet its proportion of the total cost to be borne by the municipalities as finally certified by the directors, the funds to be raised by any means within the authority of the municipalities and to pay the funds into the treasury of th0 district in amounts and at times the treasurer of the district may require. The municipalities may each levy a tax not to exceed one mill on the taxable property located therein, to pro- vide such funds. Said levy shall be within all other limitations provided by law. Thank you for your positive support. Sincerely, LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT John Lewman Treasurer enc A llur Lake Minnetonka Conservation District is • REVENUE LMCD Communities Eurasian Water Milfoil Court Fines Licenses 6 Permits Interest Deposits on licenses & permits Other Shoreland Rules, MN DNR Adoption, Grant Shoreland Rules, MN DNR Admin /Cons. TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE *Total LMCD communities = $166,825 DISBURSEMENTS Administration Personal Services Salaries Auditing Services Total Personal Services Contractual Services Telephone Postage Printing, Legal Notices Utilities Maintenance, Office Equipment Provision for computer equip. maint Janitorial Services Professional /Contract Services Total Contractual Services 1991 BUDGET 1989 1989 1990 1991 Budget Actual Budget Adopted S 99,032 $ 99,032 $ 89,490 $103,825 780 1,391 1,400 1,475 -0- 82,653 60,000 63,000) 2,850 31,317 40,000 35,000 65,185 80,000 65,000 119,990 7,716 10,000 8,000 900 3,860 4,000 2,000 -0- 1,679 3,000 1,000 -0- °0- -0- 45,000 -0- -0- -0- 15,000 $219,022 $291,442 $286,490 $337 $ 68,172 $ 70,196 $ 84,060 $100,500 650 750 750 775 68,822 70,946 84,810 101,275 780 1,391 1,400 1,475 1,900 2,597 1,900 2,280 2,850 930 2,500 2,000 600� 360 450 360 900 1,206 1,500 1,600 -0- -0- -0- 1,800 900 780 637 720 10,800 4,111 9,080 5 18,370 11,322 17,460 16,455 011/4 1 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 1991 .BUDGET - Continued Commodities & Supplies Office Supplies General Supplies Subscriptions Total Commodities 6 Supplies Lease, Insurance, Employee Benefits Office Lease Provision for new office lease Insurance and Bonds Employer Contributions Mileage, Expense, Training Total Lease, Insurance, Employee Benefits Capital Outlay Furniture, Fixtures, Equipment Total Capital Outlay Total Administration Legal 1=gal S_rv!ces Prosecution Process Service Total Legal Consulting Services Long-Term Management Program Shoreland Rules Total Consulting Services Committees Studies, Lake Inspection, Reports Public Information Total Committees 71117 1989 1989 1990 1991 Budget Actual Budget Adopted 2,100 9,285 2,500 2,625 380 1,472 400 450 490 180 210 210 2,970 10,937 3,110 3,285 3,600 3,600 4,140 -0- -0- -0- 3,300 4,077 3,500 12,300 10,548 13,810� 1,360 1,151 1,300 20,560 19,376 22,750 1,800 350 2,500 1,800 350 2,500 5,400 4,200 5,050 14,800 2,360 31,810 0g ) 3,000 3,000 112,5:2 112,931 130,630 155,825 18,000 13,643 18,000 20,000 14,500 20,043 13,500 20,000 -0- 206 1,400 500 32,500 33,892 32,900 40,500 30,000 145,011 42,960 -0- -0- -0- -0- 12,500 30,000 145,011 42,960 12,500 4,000 1,696 5,000 4,000 15,000 2,457 15,000 5 O 19,000 4,153 20,000 9 2 Lake Minnetonka Conservation District • 1991 BUDGET - Continued 1989 1989 1990 1991 Budget Actual Budget Adopted Contingency Contingency 25,000 -0- -0- 10,000 Total Contingency 25,000 -0- -0- 10,000 Deposit Refunds Deposit Refunds -0- -0- -0- 2,000 Total Deposit Refunds -0- -0- -0- 2,000 Eurasian Water Milfoil Weed Harvesting Programi EWM Harvesting Program -0- 82,653 60,000 63,000 Total Eurasian Water Milfoil Weed Harvesting Program -0- 82,653 60,000 63,000 Shoreland Rules • Shoreland Rules, City Reimbursement -0- -0- -0- 45,000 Total Shoreland Rules, City Reimb. -0- -0- -0- 45,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND DISBURSEMENTS $219,022 $378,987 $286,490 J1H jL 325 (a) Transferred $3,000 from Consulting Service to support salary for Administrative Technician position addition. (b) Average increase figured at 5 %. (c) Projecting 20% postage cost increase. (d) Includes provision for enlarged office space. (e) Transferred $1,000 from Professional /Contract Services to = alaries. (f) Transferred $2,000 from Consulting Service to Employer Contributions to support Administrative Technician position. (g) Anticipating computer equipment addition, partial donation, plus software • and operator training, office furniture and files additions. 6 -28 -90 3 A Lake Minnetonka Conservation District 1991 BUDGET • DISTRIBUTION OF EXPENSE % of Total Net Tax Capacity 4.41 2.00 .88 53.26 1.26 3.79 5.50 10.22 5.70 1.32 2.13 1.67 6.34 1.32 % of Budget Net Tax Resulting from Capacity Deephaven S 5,558,790 Excelsior 2,526,823 Greenwood 1,116,512 Minnetonka 67,212,191 Minnetonka Beach 1,593,049 Minnetrista 4,767,438 Mound 6,941,044 Orono 12,892,214 Shorewood 7,197,406 Spring Park 1,922,112 Tonka Bay 2,694,546 Victoria 2,094,664 Wayzata 8,003,606 Woodland 1,00,620 % of Total Net Tax Capacity 4.41 2.00 .88 53.26 1.26 3.79 5.50 10.22 5.70 1.32 2.13 1.67 6.34 1.32 % of Budget Share of Resulting from $166,825 $33,365 Maximum 1991 to Minnetonka Budget 7.55 $ 12,585 3.43 5,718 1.49 2,526 *20.00 33,365 2.16 3,605 6.47 10,784 9.41 15,706 • 17.49 29,173 9.76 16,287 2.61 4,349 3.66 6,097 2.84 4,740 10.86 18,110 2.27 3,780 Total $126,191,015 *Maximum of $33,365 6 -28-90 100.007 4 100.00% $166,825 .7 2111 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION • June 25, 1990 Those present were: Chair Bill Meyer. Commissioners Geoff Michael, Jerry Clapsaddle, Bill Thal, Ken Smith, Frank Weiland and Michael Mueller, Council Representative Liz Jensen, City Manager Ed Shukle, City Planner Mark Koegler, and Secretary Peggy James. Absent and excused was: Commissioner Bill Voss. The meeting was called to order at 7:32 p.m. The following citizens were present: John Royer, and Steve a Kristin Miller. M 1 MUTES: MOTION made by Clapsaddle, seconded by Thal, to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of June 119 1990 as sub- mitted. Motion carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS: a. Case Mo. VU_V 1'+' tmn r ranK 1 1 fl. .ivr KUYVI . & ALW A a.ar,W f lvd.. That Part of Lot 52, Lvnwold Park, Lake Minneton'ka. PID 014- 11 -2 -44 0036. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - to allow outdoor retail sales: Continued Public Hearing. City Planner, Mark Koegler, reviewed his recommendation to allow accessory outdoor retail sales for the Ben Franklin store. After gathering conclusions from previous Planning Commission discus- sions and meeting with the owner, John Royer and the City Manager, Koegler recommended approval of the conditional use per- mit with the following conditions: 1. No merchandise of any kind shall be stored, displayed or sold on, or from the public sidewalk area (right -of -way). 2. From October Ist through November 7th of each year, pumpkins are permitted to be displayed and sold along the front por- tion of the story on private property only. 3. From December 1st through January 7th of each year, the parking lot on the south side of building can be used for display and sales of Christmas trees. 4. A fence enclosure shall be constructed at the southwest cor- ner of the site in the vicinity of the existing tree and shrub sales area. All merchandise shall be displayed. sold and storEi within the enclosed area. 5. Merchandise storage at the front of the store on private 0 property shall be limited to flowers and other plant materials and a display of one example of each bagged good product (maximum ten products). All merchandise shall be kept in a neat and orderly manner. Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 1990 Page 2 Koegler confirmed for Mueller that the proposed outdoor sales area is within the 20% of the floor area requirement. Jensen questioned if set -up and take -down dates should be established for the temporary structure. Royer agreed that a set -up date of March 15 and a take wn date of September I was sufficient. Chair Meyer opened the public hearing. There was discussion relating to the appearance of the front of the store. The sale of bagged goods on pallets was discussed. Weiland and Thai were concerned about people using the sidewalk for the purpose of shopping, and therefore clogging the sidewalk with shoppers. Since there were no citizens present to speak on the issue, Chair Meyer closed the public hearing. MOTION made by Mueller to approve staff recommendation for approval of the Conditional Use Permit including conditions 1. through 4. as stated above, and the following: 5. Merchandise storage at the front of the store on private property shall be limited to 4 feet from the building wall to allow a 2 foot walkway for shoppers, and the sale of bagged goods shall b3 al- lowed from the door southward only. All merchan- dise shall be kept in a neat and orderly manner. 6. The temporary structure shall not be erected be- tween September l and March 15, respectively. Motion seconded by Thal. Motion carried unanimously. This case will be heard by the City Council on June 26, 1990. b. ggse No. 90 — vzz: br-eve 171 1 Per, 773* ruaw urvr mss rnemjg wa. ,:v, Block 10, Highlands, PiO #23- 117 -24 -42 0050. VARI ANCE: rear Yard setback. The City Planner, Mark Koegler, explained that the applicant is requesting a 2 foot variance to allow an 8' x 20' addition to the rear of an existing garage. The purpose for this request is to allow storage space for a pop -up camper. Since a hardship does not exist, practical difficulty needs to be addressed. Staff recommended approval of the variance if the applicant can demonstrate to the Planning Commission that the 8 foot expansion Is the minimum depth necessary to accommodate the recreational vehicle. 2121 Planning Commission Minutes June 25, 1990 Page 3 The applicant, Steve Miller, stated to the Commission that the Interior of the existing garage is actually only 19 feet. They want to store two cars, the camper trailer, a motorcycle and toys In the garage to keep their yard clean, and therefore they need the extra space. The applicants presented a letter from Scott and Sue Bryce, their neighbors abutting the rear property line, stating that they approve of the addition. The applicant confirmed that access at the west side of the house Is impossible due to a row of trees. The consensus of the Commission was that a practical difficulty did not exist. Thai suggested that they angle the back of the garage with the property line. MOTION made by Thal. seconded by Weiland to table the request to allow the applicant time to reconsider his request. Motion carried unanimously. The applicant expressed his dissatisfaction with their decision and the fact that the $50 application fee is not refundable. He • stated that he will not pursue the issue any further. Presentation of the Downtown Study The City Manager explained that the Commission needs to set a date to meet with the City Council and Economic Development Com- mission to hear a presentation of the Downtown Study as prepared by Public Financial Systems and VanDoren Hazard & Stallings. The Commission agreed that Monday, J u l y 16th at 7:00 was a good time to meet. City Council Representative Repor Jensen reviewed the minutes of the June 12th City Council meet- ing, and the agenda for the June 26th meeting. MOTION made by Weiland, seconded by Thal to adjourn the meeting at 8:47 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. Chair, Bill Meyer Attest: AIA42 to oi a iati n of metropolitan municipalities M JUL a aso June 29, 1990 Mr. Edward Shukle, Jr. City Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Ed: We want to know what you opportunity to share your invited to a breakfast mei will be mcating at T. Minnesota. (NW quadrant about 2 1/2 miles west of think, and in order to provide input with the AMM Board and sting on Wednesday, July 18th. at Wrights, 3310 So. Highway 1 of Hwy. 101 and Minnetonka Blvd. I -494) you the direct staff you are 7:30 A.M. We D1, Minnetonka, (Hen. Co. 5J. This "get - together ", one in a series of area meetings sponsored by the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (ANN), has several purposes: 1. To provide you with the means to help establish the yearly AMM agenda and work program. Legislative issues raised at this meeting will be forwarded to the appropriate policy committees. 2. To appraise you of major upcoming program and issue priorities as seen by the Board and Staff. 3. To discuss and receive your input with respect to the AMM Mission and Services Task Force Report recommendations which were released at the Annual Meeting and previously mailed to each member city. We expect this to be a very informal gathering with lots of give and take and hope you will attend and share your ideas with us. Please extend this invitation to members of your City Council as well. a123 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 2274008 This invitation is being sent directly to Mayors, Managers /Adminiutrators and the designated Legislative Contact person for your city. All reservations must be made with Carol Williams at 227 -4008 by Monday noon July 16, 1990. Most Sincerely, Larry kken, AMM President Karen Anderson, AMM Boardmember Golden Valley Councilmember Minnetonka Councilmember 01 0 wt Tom Spies, AMM boardmember Bloomington Councilmember • • alAy