1983-06-07June 7, 1883
REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
Sg
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, was held at 5341 Maywood Road in
said City on June 7, 1983, at 7:30 P.M.
Those present were: Mayor Bob Polston, Councilmembers Pinky Charon, Gary Paulsen.
Councilmember Swenson was absent and excused. Councilmember Peterson arrived late
at 9:30 P.M. Also present were: City Attorney Curt Pearson, City Engineer John
Cameron, City Planner Mark Koegler, City Manager Jon Elam, City Clerk Fran Clark
and Police Chief Bruce Wold, and the following interested citizens: Frank
Hancuch, Jerry Pietrowski, Pete Ward, Larry Connelly, Buzz Sycks, Bud Stannard,
Kaye Westerlund, Ron .Gehring, Gregory Pederson, Charles Peugh.
The Mayor opened the meeting and welcomed the people in attendance.
MINUTES
The Minutes of the May 17, 1983, Regular Meeting were presented for consideration.
Charon moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the
May 17, 1983, Regular Meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
The Minutes of the May 31, 1983, Board of Review were presented for consideration.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of the
May 31, 1983, Board of Review as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
The Mayor asked that Larry Connelly, promoter of the "Blue Water Daze"
Celebration in Mound be recognized for all his work and for getting the
Celebration recognized nationally. ABC to levision will carry .some short
footage of the Blue Water Daze Celebration at 7:00 A.M., Wednesday, June 15,
1983, on Good Morning America.
The Council then decided to move from the regular Agenda to the Planning
Commission Items starting with #3 and come back to #2 on the Agenda.
PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
CASE #83-226 - GREGORY S. PEDERSON - 6087 ASPEN ROAD - LOT 1$, BROOKTON -
PID #1 -117-2 31 0019 - FRONT YARD VARIANCE
The City Manager explained that the applicant has applied for a 12 foot front
yard variance to allow. the construction of an attached 20' x 24' garage within
18 feet of Clover Circle front yard setback, with the doors. to face the Aspen
Road driveway entrance with a 50 foot setback - from his other front yard
setback. The Planning Commission has recommended approval.
Charon moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-9o RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE FRONT YARD 12 FOOT
VARIANCE AS REQUESTED FOR LOT 18, BROOKTON (6087
ASPEN ROAD) PID #14-117-24 31 0019
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
90 ,tune 7, 1.983
CASE # 83-227 - VALERIE SWENSON - 5005 AVON DRIVE - LOT 2, BLOCK 3,
SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT "B" - PID #24-117-24 14 004 1- MISCELLANEOUS
The City Manager explained that the applicant had previously applied for
a variance and it was denied. The applicant has reapplied and reduced the
size of the garage by 5 feet and now needs building setback variances to
allow. the existing non-conforming side yards of 6.6 ft. and 1.2 ft. and to
add an attached two-story garage to be placed 5 ft. to 7 ft. from. the west
property line, 6 ft. to the east property line, and 5 ft. to 21 ft. from the
north property line; the lakeside 20 ft. by 20 ft. addition would be placed
6 feet and 13 feet from each side side property line with the existing
porch to be removed. The Planning Commission have recommended approval
of these variances due to the topography of the property, narrowness of
the lot, and relief to the landowner. The Planning Commission conditioned
its recommended approval asking that the owner bring the existing structure
up to current building code. The owner has submitted a letter stating that
the following will be done:
- Repair exisiting foundation to current building code (floor and support
system).
- Rewire existing building to meet electrical code.
- Plumbing in existing building will be inspected.
- Remove existing porch on the lakeside of the property.
- Roof lines may change but the roof height will not be altered.
- Replace siding with cedar.
- If necessary, relocate sewer and water lines.
The Council asked that the above conditions be incorporated in the resolution
of approval.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-91 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE VARIOUS VARIANCES AS
REQUESTED FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 3, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT
"B" (5005 AVON DRIVE) PID #24-117-24 14 0041
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE #83-228 - CHALES PEUGH, SIGNCRAFTERS (FOR BURGER CHEF) - 5025 SHORELINE
BLVD. - LOTS 3, ,5,6, 36 ~ PART OF 2 ~ 37, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY
HILLS UNIT "F" - PID #13-117-24 43 Olll
The City Manager explained that this sign permit is to replace the Burger
Chef sign with an Hardee's sign. The Hardee's sign wilt be slightly smaller
than the Burger Chef sign. The signs will be placed in the same locations
as the existing signs. The Planning Commission .has recommended approval.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-92 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A SIGN VARIANCE AS
REQUESTED FOR LOTS 3,4,5,6, 36 & 24 FT. OF 2 ~
4g FT. OF 37, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT "F"
(5025 SHORELINE DP,IVE) PID #13-117-24 43 0111
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
91
June 7, 1983
CASE #83-223 - CATALYST PROPERTIES, INC. - PART OF LOT 27, LAFAYETTE PARK,
LAKE MINNETONKA - PID #13-117-24 22 0023 - 5ET DATE FOR
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARIANCE FROM
MINIMUM SIZE - SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has recommended
approval with the Staff's recommendations and now a public hearing date
needs to be set.
Charon moved and Paulsen moved the following resolution
RESOLUTION #83-93 RESOLUTION TO SET THE DATE OF JUNE 21, 1983
AT 7:30 P,M. FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING ON A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CATALYST PROPERTIES,
INC. - PID #13-117-24 22 0023
The vote was unanimously in favor.. Motion carried.
CASE #83-224 - DOUG MOODIE & MICHAEL C. BEATTY - VACATION OF FIRE LANE -
SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
The City Manager explained that the Planning Commission has recommended
approval. The Council should now set a date fora public hearing on this
vacation.
Charon moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-94 RESOLUTION TO SET THE DATE OF JULY 5, 1983, AT
730 P.M. FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE VACATION
OF THE FIRE LANE ON EOGEWATER DRIVE BETWEEN 4908
AND 4916
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
CASE #83-225 - PAUL A. HENRY - 5056 SULGROVE ROAD - LOTS 7,8, 13,14,15 &
PART OF 6, BLOCK 2 WHIPPLE - PID #25-11 -2 12 Ol 5
-SET DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The City Manager reported that the Planning Commission has recommended approval
with the condition that Mr. Henry get a permit from the Watershed District.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-95 RESOLUTION TO SET THE DATE OF JUNE 21, 1983, AT
7~3o P,M. FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT - PID #25-117-24 12 0185
The vote was unanimously in favor. .Motion carried.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 46 OF THE CITY CODE
The City Manager explained that the residents of Sinclair Road have petitioned
to have the "No Parking" signs on the north side of Sinclair Road
included in the City Code.- It seems they complained several years ago because
transient fishermen were using the street as a parking area causing difficult
ingress and egress from their driveways. The City erected a no parking sign
92
June 7, 1983
on the north side of Sinclair Road but neglected to pass an enabling
ordinance.
Charon moved and Paulsen seconded the following:
ORDINANCE #449 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 46.28, (b)
SUBSECTION 58 OF THE CITY CODE BY ADDING
u. - "NO PARKING ANYTIME" ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF SINCLAIR ROAD FROM WESTEDGE BLVD.
EAST TO THE END OF THE PAVEMENT
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion .carried.
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 3g OF THE CITY CODE
The Police Chief has submitted a memo asking for a change in Chapter 39,
Section 3g.g0, subsections (d) and (e) of the City Code because they
contradict each other. Subsection (d) speaks. to a recurring impoundment
of a dog within "the last two years" and subsection (e) speaks to recurring
impoundment of a dog "within a year". He would like (d) to also read
"within a year".
Charon moved and Paulsen seconded the following:
ORDINANCE #450 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 39.90, SUBSECTION
(d) OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO REDEMPTION OF
ANIMALS
The vote .was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
EXTENSION OF RESOLUTION #82-156 - SUBDIU151-ON REQUEST - LOTS 16 & 17
SKARP ~ LINDQUISTS RAVENSWOOD
The City Manager reported that the Building Official has recommended
approval of this request for an extension of Resolution #82-156.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-g6 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE EXTENSION OF RESOLUTfON
#82-156 (SUBDIUlSION REQUEST) FOR 1 YEAR, TO
JUNE 7, 1984
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING - INFORMATION ~ POLICY STATEMENTS
The City Manager explained that tax increment financing may be used to
provide public funds for:
1. the redevelopment or rehabilitation of deteriorated areas of the city;
2. assistance to facilitate the construction of low-moderate income
housing;
3• the promotion of economic development and the provision of employment
opportunities in the city.
Any project utilizing tax increment financing as a source of revenue requires
the citation of two statutes, one creating the project area and specifying
its prupose, and one establishing the means of financing the project through
the creation of a tax increment district.
June 7, 1983
The City will first have to decide whether it is going to proceed under
Chapter 462 which deals with a redevelopment project and is basically an
operation of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority with approvals by
the City Counci l or if it will proceed under Chapter 472A which deals
with the establishment of a municipal development district and can proceed
without the HRA being involved.
With respect to both Chapter 462 and 472A, a Policy Statement has been
developed to cover each of these two types of projects. The Manager then
read the Policy Statement ''Tax Increment Redevelopment Projects".
Mayor Polston stated that he would like the policy to limit, to some extent,
the percentage of tax base of the City on TiF. After some discussion it was
agreed to limit it to .not more than 5% of the market value of the City.
93
The Manager then read the Policy Statement "Tax Increment Economic Development
Projects". The Council asked the City Attorney to research
a statement in #1 of the Policy which reads, "The developer will normally be
expected to pay for municipal service costs attributable to the project during
the tax increment's life (i.e. snowplowing, street sweeping, fire protection,
police protection, etc.) ....." to see if this can legally be done.
The Mayor asked if there were any questions from the audience on the two
policies.
Pete Ward asked what the nature of the contract between the City and
the Developer would be?
The City Attorney stated that the contract would include plans and
specifications, timing (letter of credit), and would be
very tight to protect the City.
A question of the time allowed for tax
The Attorney stated that the length of
Statutes. Chapter 462 allows up to 25
up to 8 years. The Council would have
years the tax increment would remain.
influenced by the number of years talc
increment financing was asked.
time is regulated by the
years and Chapter 472 allows
to decide exactly how many
That time would also be
alated to pay back the bonds.
Councilmember Paulsen asked about the Character of Improvement with
regard to Lynwood Blvd. be closed and traffic having to be rerouted
and a new sfireet considered. The City Manager explained that even
though this would not happen on the tax increment site it would still
have to be paid for out. of-the tax increment bond, up front.
There were several questions about benefit to the. public and
acquisition procedures.
The Council then decided to-hold a public hearing on the Policy Statements
and make them .available to the public by placing them at the public library
and City Hall.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded a motion to set July 5, 1983 at 8:00 P.M.
as the date for a public hearing on the Policy Statements of Tax Increment
Financing. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
g4 June 7, 1983
TOWN SQUARE DEVELOPMENT - REPORT
The City Manager recapped the background of this proposal that was presented
to the Council earlier this year. Since that time the project boundaries
and included parcels have been modified slightly. Those modifications
mandate the adjustment of the preliminary increment projections as follows:
Assessors Market Value $ 942,500
Relocation of 11 Properties @$10,000 110,000
Demolition 45,000
Legal 50,000
Administration 75,000
$ 1,222,500
Land Cost Charged to Town Square $222,500
Tax Increment to Mound
Property Tax - 1883
$ 1M @ 8.5% - 15 Year
$1,000,000 x .1182
Total Tax
$ 1,000,000
$ 38,655.32
118,200
$ 156,855.32
Projected Market Value
Projected Tax
S 3,750,000 +
$163,000 +
(Note: the above information has been provided to staff by Smiley/Glotter.)
According to the above the tax increment to Mound would be $1,000,000 and anything
over that amount in costs would be the responsibility of the Developer.
As far as the bond interest rate of 8.5% goes, these bonds today go for
slightly more than this and since the selling of bonds is in the future
it would be a guessing game as to what they would finally go for.
The City Manager stated that the City has gone about as far as it can
with regard to what the Council asked for earlier this Spring. The
proposal has been modified and we can now say that the projected tax of
$163,000 is enough to cover the the annual tax increment bond payment.
Thus the next step is that the City should designate an area as a
development district. He then presented the Council with a map of the
area that could possibly be included in a development district. (SEE
EXHIBIT "A") This is an area that might be eligible for development
or redevelopment if a proposal came forth and meet the requirements of the
law.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-97 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A BOARD POLICY STATEMENT
DESIGNATING A SPECIFIC AREA (EXHIBIT "A") AS
A HIGH PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT ~ REDEVELOPMENT
AREA AND TYING THIS AREA TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AND THE DOWNTOWN ADVISORY COMMITTEE STUDY
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
95
June 7, 19$3
The City Manager explained that the next step. is for the City Council to
designate itself or the HRA to implement and administer the redevelopment
project which would depend on whether the project is a redevelopment project
or an economic development project. (Chapter 462 or 472A of the Statutues.)
Councilmember Paulsen asked fora definition of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority. The City Planner stated that it is basically a semi-autonomous
body appointed by the City Council, charged with administration and overseeing
of primarily redevelopment projects, economic development projects or
housing projects. It is similar to other Commissions of the City, i.e. Planning,
Parks, etc.
At this point, it has been assumed that the Town Square project would fall
under Chapter 462 of the Statutes which would require that the HRA would be
involved. This assumption being made because of .the 15 years that has
been requested for the TIF.
Step 3 is to complete a preliminary feasibility study and determination that
the project is feasible. This item is essentially complete, however, it
seems subject to change due to questionable cost estimates, .changes in businessed
and district boundaries, etc. Prior to review and action on this item, the
developer's feasibility study needs to be finalized. This will require the
involvement of the developer, city engineer, city manager and city planner.
The City has completed as much as it can at this point before leading into
Step 4. The City Manager stated that what he and the Planner are saying
tonight is that we have completed the preliminary feasibility .study and it
seems feasible using the developer's figures and current tax figures and that
Town Square appears to be feasible. The figures have to be considerably
refined which is a much more time consuming and expensive process which
the City Planner is ready to do, but first .the Council needs to adopt the
plan as modified for Town Square. Then when a more detailed document is
prepared a public hearing can be held on the proposal.
Councilmember Peterson arrived at 930 P.M.
The Council then went back over the proposal from Town Square. The Planner
explained that the developers of Town Square have asked for $1,000,000 in
bonding and stand ready to pick up any additional costs.. Any additional
costs would be included in the development contract.
Mayor Polston suggested looking into either building or leasing space for
a new Liquor Store in the downtown area.
The City Manager recapped what has already been discussed. So far it has
been decided that yes, the plan is feasible and yes, we are ready to go
on to the next step which is to develop a comprehensive redevelopment plan
and a financing plan. The comprehensive redevelopment plan would be done
by the City Planner and the financial plan would be done by Miller& Schroeder.
Once those are .completed, they would become the focus of the public hearings
in the future. By going thru the steps up to this point we are saying
yes, we agree with the plan in principal and concept only.
The City Manager explained that what is needed now is an detailed analyzation of
the project and financing with a translation of this anaylsis into a final
feasiblity.
The City Attorney and the City Planner were directed to prepare a resolution
to authorize proceeding to investigate a redevelopment project and a tax
increment financing plan for the proposed Town Square development.
g6 June 7, 1983
Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-98 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE. CITY STAFF TO PROCEED
TO INVESTIGATE A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND A
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED
TOWN SQUARE DEVELOPMENT
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
BID APPROVAL - ISLAND PARK WATER IMPROVEMENTS
The City Manager explained that bids were received today and have been
reviewed by Hickok & Associates. There were 3 parts to this bid and the
following have been recommended for approval:
Bid A: Booster Pump Station
A & K Construction Co. - $89,990.00
Bid B: Standpipe
Webco Tank, Inc. - $117,228.00
Bid C: Watermain
f.F. Jedlicki, Inc. - $132,570.00
Peterson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-99 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BID OF A & K CONSTRUCTION
CO FOR BID A - $89,990.-00; WEBCO' TANK, INC. FOR
BID B - $117,228.00; AND F.F. JEDLICKI, INC. FOR
BID C - $132,570.00 FOR THE ISLAND PARK WATER
IMPROVEMENTS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
BID APPROVAL - FIRE HALL ADDITION
The City Manager explained that there were 3 bids received and that the
City is only approving the Base Bid. There was no funding for Alternates
1 or 2 so they are not to be considered. The low bidder for the Base Bid
was Falls ~ Nyhusmoen at $29,857.00.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-100 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BID OF FALLS AND NYHUSMOEN
IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,857.00 FOR THE FIRE HALL ADDITION
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
BID APPROVAL - 1983 STREET REPAIR PROGRAM
The City Manager explained that there were 6 bids received and the low
bidder was Buffalo Bituminous. Section 7 of the bid is to be deleted.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-101 RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT THE BID OF BUFFALO BITUMINOUS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $31,078.00 FOR THE 1983 STREET
REPAIR PROGRAM
June 7, 1883
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
BID APPROVAL - CITY HALL SKYLIGHT ~ ROOF REPAIR
97
The City Manager explained that there was only one bid received on this, although
there were several people out looking at the roof in the last week. The bid
was from W.J. White Co. in the amount of $34,476.00 plus Alternate #3 which
is a tappered roof on both roof areas to provide for proper drainage, $6,792.00.
Polston moved-and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-102 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BID OF W.J. WHITE CO.
IN THE AMOUNT OF $41,268.00
The City Manager reported that this amount is the complete replacement of
the skylights and reroofing both the upper and lower roofs.
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
$20,000 would come from Revenue Sharing and the balance from the Building. Fund.
DESIGNATED SIGNER. OF APPLICATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT - TRAINING MONEY
The City Manager explained that Bruce is the first designated signer for
the application for reimbursement of training money. Police Chief Wold
is recommended that William Hudson also be authorized to sign these
applications.
Peterson moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-103 RESOLUTION DESIGNATING WILLIAM HUDSON AS SIGNER
OF THE APPLICATIONS FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAINING
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
HUD APPLICATION - REVOLVING LOAN FUND
The City Manager explained that the New Jobs Bill has provided Mound with
another way to assist the existing commercial business in Mound. He has
developed a Small Business Revolving Loan Program that will be funded by
CDBG funds.. This program as proposed will provide $]00,000 from City CDBG
Funds and $100,000 from area banks. The City's fund will be the source of
longer term loans of up to $25,000 for a minimum of 15 years at 2% interest.
This will be matched by equal. loan amounts from area banks at going interest
rates to provide a total-loan up to $50,000 at a melded interest rate of
about 8 - g %, Currently. He is asking for approval of this program so
that it can be submitted to HUD for funding.
Polston moved and Charon seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-104 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL HUD APPLICATION
TO CREATE THE "REVOLVING LOAN FUND" FOR
COMMERCIAL LOANS
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
g8 June 7, 1983
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
The City Manager suggested forming an Economic Development Commission that
could coordinate and oversee efforts in the area of economic development.
Responsibilities of this commission could be to oversee the policy
development and implementation in the areas of:
1. Downtown Revitalization Programs
(all the HUD funded programs that have been and are being
developed for-the downtown area)
2. Tax Increment Financing Plans & Proposals
3. Downtown Development
4. Business Promotion of the City of Mound
5. Recommendations to the City Planning Commission on matters relating
to zoning and economic development. planning.
6. Minnesota Star Cities Program
7. industrial Revenue Bond Proposal Review
8. Development of City Economic Development Plan and oversee its
implementation.
Mayor Polston and Councilmember Paulsen stated that they envisioned funding
this type of a commission to promote business coming into Mound. The City
Manager suggested that the commission be allowed to propose a budget for
their promotion of Mound. It could possibly be funded with HUD funds.
The Council suggested that the Planning Commission be asked to give their
input on the creation of an Economic Development Commission.
Peterson moved and Charon seconded a motion directing the City .Manager to
consult the Planning Commission and get their input on the creation of an
Economic Development Commission. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion
carried.
Councilmember Paulsen asked that a policy statement be developed for all
advisory commissions.
MICROCOMPUTER PURCHASE
The City Manager submitted a detailed memo on the reasons the City needs
a microcomputer, terminal and printer.
Peterson moved and Polston seconded a motion authorizing the purchase of
a Direct 1025 Microcomputer, and .825 Terminal and 2 software packages
(Word Star ~ Supercalc) for $5,415.00. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
Peterson moved and Polston seconded a motion to authorize the purchase of
a multiplexer in the amount of $4,400.00. The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
Peterson moved and Polstron seconded a motion the authorize the purchase of
a high quality printer in an amount not to exceed $2,350.00. The vote was
unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
99
June 7, 1983
APPROVE QUOTE FOR REPAIR OF WELL #3
Charon moved and Peterson seconded a motion to approve the quotation of
Stevens Well Drilling Co., Inc. in the amount of .$7,150.00 for the repair
of Well #3• The vote was unanimously in favor.. Motion carried.
TRANSIENT MERCHANT'S LICENSE
Polston moved and Peterson seconded a motion to authorize the issuance
of a Transient Merchants License to Diane J. Frostan for a sale at the
Mound Legion Hall on June 9, 1983• The vote was unanimously in favor.
Motion carried.
PAYMENT REQUEST - PERKINS LANDSCAPE - $5,448.80
The City Manager explained that this request is for work that has been
completed thru May 31, 1983, at Mound Bay Park.
Charon moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to approve the payment request
of Perkins Landscape in the amount of $5,448.80. The vote was unanimously
in favor. Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
Charon moved and Peterson seconded a motion to approve the bills as presented
on the pre-list in the amount of $155,610.68, when funds are available. A
roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
WESTONKA SPORTS VARIANCE
The City Manager explained that John Scherven needs a variance on the front
of his remodeled building because it encroaches 3~" over the sidewalk at the
top of the front. He further explained that he did not take this to the
Planning Commission beta-use it would have taken several weeks and the
construction is due to be done tomorrow. It would cause undue delays in
the construction.
Peterson moved and Paulsen seconded the following resolution.
RESOLUTION #83-105 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A 34".VARIANCE AT THE TOP
OF THE FRONT WALL - PID #14-117-24 44 0039 -
LOT 52, LYNWOLD PARK
The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
INFORMATION/MISCELLANEOUS
A. Letter of thanks for stairs on Avocet and Bluebird from Geoff Michael.
B. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District materials.
1. Memo on the Laws of Minnesota for 1982, Chapter 509
2. Meeting Notice for June 9, 1983•
3. Minutes of April 21, 1983, meeting.
C. Ind. School Dist. #277 Minutes of May 17, 1983 and May 9, 1983.
100 June 7, 1983
D. Review from Metropolitan Council - May 13, 1983
E. Information Material on Accessory Apartments.
F. Memo from Police Chief on assaults.
G. League of Minnesota Cities Building Memo.
H. Twin Cities Labor Market Information for May, 1983.
I. American Legion Post #398 Gambling Report.
J• 3 newspaper articles:
1. Smaller Minnesota Towns Competing for Businesses.
2. Low-Cost Business Incubators Hatch Entrepreneurs.
3• Stronger Development Agency Needed to Compete.
K. Calendar for June.
Paulsen moved and Charon seconded a motion to adjourn at 11:05 P.M. The
vote was unanimously in favor. Motion carried.
o .Elam, City Manager
~~~ ~.~~ v
Fran Clark, City Cterk
i
BILLS-----JUNE 7, 1883
Budget Plumbing
Robert Byrnes
Boy Scouts of Amer
Fran Clark
Commissioner of Revenue
Dick & Joe's Auto Body
Director of Property Taxa
Dept of Property Tax
Jon E 1 am
Doug Fetter
Griggs, Cooper
Georgia Tech
Johnson Bros. Liquor
League of MN Cities
Motor Vehicle Mfg Assn
MN Park Supervis. Assn
Mound Postmaster
Old Peoria
Ed Phillips
Nan Pollach
Real One Acquisition
State Treasurer
State Bank of Mound
Howard Simar
Robin Schiel
Roger Stark
Michael Vargo
Tom Watson
Werner Weisser
Xerox
Air Comm
Earl F Andersen
Abdo, Abdo ~ Eick
Acro Minnesota
Badger Meter
Ben Franklin
Bertelson Bros.
Holly Bostrom
Burlington Northern
Butchs Bar Supply
Business Furniture
Bowman Distribution
Capitol Electronics
Coca Cola Bottling
Gary Cayo
City Club Distrib
Chemlawn
Dependable Services
Day Distrib
East Side Beverage
Jon Elam
Schnell ~ Madson
10.00
17.08
1,100.00
400.00
5,039.84
391 .11
28,787.37
113.00
400.00
32.50
4,606.80
225.00
5,877.37
170.00
10.00
21.00
102..00
930.80
2,826.27
65.00
853.41
9.50
5,000.00
400.00
32.50
30.00
60.00
105.00
12.00
967.08
96.00
143.26
4,700.00
321.33
2,713.38
80.20
14.95
344.76
533.33
208.80
349.56
178.39
36.00
286.30
18.79
3,943.79
1,488.00
33.00
4,263.77
4,773.23
30.50
560.00
Westonka Sports Center
Westonka Comminity Service
Flexible Pipe Tool
Farmers Steel Co.
Gold Medal Beverage
Henn Co. Treas
Hecksel Machine Shop
Shirley Hawks
Wm Hudson
Robert Johnson
Internal Revenue
Kromer Co.
Kool Kube Ice
Herman Kraft
Litfin Trucking
Lowell's
Long Lake Ford Tractor
Sharon Legg
City of Minnetrista
Mound Medical Clinic
Mound Super Valu
Munitech, Inc.
Midwest Paint Mfg
Mack Trucks, Inc.
City of Mound
Metro Fone
Maple Plain Diesel
N.S.P.
New England Camp Supply
A.J. Ogle
Pepsi Cola/7 Up
Pogreba Distrib
Pitney Bowes Credit
Precision Striping
Perkins Landscape
Brad Roy
Regal Window Clean
Real One Acquisition
Suburban Community Services
SOS Printing
Sterling Elec Co.
Mike Sullivan Painting
Standard Spring
Twin City Home Juice
Thrifty Snyder Drug
Thurk Bros. Chev
Tri State Drilling
Thorpe Distrib
Toll Co.
V ~ R Heating
Waconia Ridgeview
Westonka Sanitation
Bruce Wold
TOTAL BILLS
159.85
8,068.58
24.31
96.39
168.00
1,596.00
15.80
2.90
15.00
30.80
54.00
7.30
354.30
23.81
225.00
103.57
41 .97
35.91
276.00
26.00
43.44
27.60
1,990.11
1,695.90
27.40
23.60
23.20
5,233.76
595.90
1,566.05
255.00
4,307.75
26.00
1,486.00
5,338.80
12..50
10.75
675.00
831.75
68.30
134.28
5,487.48
168.45
97.62
39.56
25.90
513.98
5,032.80
2.03
189.37
6.88
165.00
67.75
155,610.58