Loading...
1978-01-10 CC Agenda Packet CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota AGENDA CM 78-2 CM 78-1 CM 78-7 CM 78-8 CM 78-3 CM 78.-4 CM 78-5 CM 78-6 CM 78-10 Mound City Council January 10, 1978 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Minutes pg. 107-108 2. Commendations 3. Planning Commission Recommendations Pg. 77-106 4. Organizational Meeting Pg. 46-76 5. Parking Variance Pg. 44-45 6. Tuxedo Easement - Lot 14, Block 6, Arden pg. 41-43 7. Tax Forfeit Land A. Lots 17, 18 & 19, Block 9, Whipple Pg. 37-40 B. Lots 1 and 2, Block 14, Whipple pg. 35-36 8. Plans & SpecificatiQns for Sanitary Sewer Inspection Pg. 34 9. Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 10. Bids A. Dump Truck and Snow Plow Bid (Bid opening Monday) B. Fire Equipment Pg. 29-33 11. Delinquent Water Bills Pg. 26-28 12. CETA Contract Pg. 25 A-E 13. Transfer of Funds 14. Payment of Bills 15. Miscelleanous Pg. 1-25 16. Committee Reports REGULAR HEETING OF THE C~TY COUNCIL December 20, 1977 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on December 20, 1977 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson, Orval Fenstad, Robert Polston and Benjamin Withhart. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Attorney Curtis Pearson and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of December 13, 1977 were presented for consid- eration. Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to accept the minutes of the Council meeting of December 13, 1977 as presented.~ The vote was unanimously in favor. PARKING VARIANCES Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-561 RESOLUTION DENYING THE PARKING VAR- IANCES AS REQUESTED ON COUNCIL MEMO- RANDUM 77-354. The vote was unanimously in favor. SKATING RINK LIGHTS Swenson moved and Fenstad seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-562 RESOLUTION APPROVING INSTALLATION OF LIGHTS IN CERTAIN PARKS FOR SKATING RINKS TO BE INSTALLED BY THE LOW BIDDER WESTWAY ELECTRIC FOR $1,435.OO. The vote was unanimously in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT No comments or suggestions were presented at this time. POLICE CAR BIDS Fenstad moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-563 The vote was unanimously in favor. RESOLUTION APPROVING PURCHASE OF A REPLACEMENT SQUAD CAR FROM THE LOW BIDDER THURK BROS. CHEVROLET IN THE AMOUNT'OF $5,639.00. 1977 BUDGET Fenstad moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-564 The vote was unanin~usly 'in favor. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ENCUM- BRANCE OF $3,OO0 FROM TttE 1977~FIRE BUDGET TO THE 1978 F/RE BUDGET.' Swenson moved and Fenstad seconded a motlon RESOLUTION 77-565 The vote was unanimously in favor. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF AN EASEMENT OF LOT 19, BLOCK ARDEN IN THE AMOUNT OF $200.00. December 20, 1977 Fenstad moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-566 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF $9,000.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE FIRE CAPITOL OUTLAY BUDGET FOR 1978 AND $3,000.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO THE INSPECTIONS BUDGET FOR 1977. The vote was unanimously in favor. TUXEDO EASEMENTS The Council briefly discussed Information Memorandum 77-213 regarding Tuxedo eas emen ts. Lovaasen moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-567 RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR LOT 16 & 17, BLOCK 14, PEMBROKE AND Lot 18 & 19, BLOCK 14, PEMBROKE WITH THE STIPULATION THAT LOT 21 BE RE- LEASED FOR SALE AND NO EXCHANGE OF MONEY BE AUTHORIZED FOR EASEMENTS ON SAID LOTS. The vote was Lovaasen, Swenson and Withhart voting aye and Polston and Fenstad voting nay. Motion carried. Mr. Don Bennett, 5023 Edgewater Drive offered comment on the performance of the City Planner. DISCUSSION-MULTIPLE DWELLING ORDINANCE The Council spent considerable time discussing and reviewing the multiple dwelling ordinance draft submitted by the City Attorney. SUBURBAN PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICE Lovaasen moved and Fenstad seconded a motion RESOLUTION 77-568 The vote was unanimously in 'favor. SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION RESOLUTION APPROINTING THE CITY MANAGER ALTERNATE REPRESENTATIVE TO THE SUBURB- AN PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICE. Polson moved and Fenstad seconded a motion recommending that Lynwood Boulevard be added to the preliminary report being prepared by the City Engineer for sidewalk construction proposed for 1978. The vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNMENT Fenstad moved and Withhart seconded a motion to adjourn to the mcetlng of January 10, 1978. The vote was unanimously in favor, so carried and adjourned. Mary H. Marske, City Clerk/Treasurer Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 9, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-11 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Dump Truck and Snow Plow Bid Only one bid was received on the Dump Truck and Snow Plow, from Thurk Bros. in St. Bonifacius. A copy of the bid is attached. Please note this bid does not include changing the used equipment from the 1973 truck; Body Company will do this only on a time and material basis. Leonard L. Kopp Engine Axle Front Axle Rear Spring Front Spring Rear Auxil i a r y Tr ans..mi s s i on Battery Seat Sid~ Mirrors Radiator Steering Brakes .Tarottle Tires Rear & Spare Tires Front Wheels Frame Alternator Gas Tank Exh au s t Shock Absorbers Directional Signals .~...w~~.F I C A T I 0 N S /??~' 2~- ton ~mp Truck ~4qutrements Are Minimum 360 cu, in. V-8 12,000 lbs. 18,500 lbs. 2 Speed Axle ' ?,000 lbs each with 3 extra leaves in rt. side front ll,500 lbs. each with'3 extra leaves in rt. side rear Rear - 2,000 lbs each Five (5) Speed Staudard Extra Heavy Duty 80 amp, !2 ~olt Bostr'0m, or equivalent, plus 2 man Senior West Coast Type Heavy.Duty Power Steering S~andard-HydraUlic with Reserve Tank-Vacn~m with gange sn5 light Hand Type 5 10:00+20 12 ply tube type Mud & Snow 2 10:00+20 12 ply' tube type Reg. Tlr e 20 +.7.0 Cask Spoke Wheels Line Frame H.,D.., Spec'iai ~--9~o Steel ~-v ~1 Amp (High 0u~pu~) l~0 Gal. with gage-Step type Drivers Side Dual Type Front.~ Dual Faced Bidder ~o Fill in Oi Details Cu, I~ lbsoeac lbs .ea '...,~./ ~ 'CD lbs.'eac Speeq H.D.:YD AmP X~V°%~s Capsci~y~ q~a~.~.y 7~ si._ Quan~;ity ~/ Si'z, Med/ - PST Amps.__-~ z/ Type Kind Llght~ Seat Belts Mus~ Moot 1978 Federal S~8nda~d Standard .9% :/ Windshield Wipers Tw° Spsed Electric with Washers Color FOB .Highway Departmsnt 29,000 lbs Mound, Minnesota OrMnge FOB Total Bid /. · ON LAKE ]VIINNETONKA INDIAN BURIAL MOUND8 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA55364 January 10, 1978 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROH: SUBJECT: City Manager, Leonard L. Kopp Public Works Director Truck & Equipment Bids The Public Works Department sent out specifications for a new cab, chassis and equipment for the new Street Dept. Maintenance Truck and only one bid was received. It is recommended that the bid of Thurk Bros. Chevrolet be accepted as they meet the specifications as presented. The estimate by Chas. Olson Equipment Company for equipment installation is a reasonable estimate for the work to be done. This equipment is budgeted for 1978. Respectfully, ~ - ' ' /i:' Robert A. Hiner Public Works Director RAM/dd CITY OF MOUND Mound, Mi~'nesota January 3, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-2 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Planning Commission Recommendations Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes. Council action is required on the following: Item 1. Rezoning Lot 54, Whipple Shores The Planning Commission recommended the easterly portion of the lot be rezoned from A-1 to Residential B and the westerly portion of the lot be left A-l, providing the garage located on the westerly portion be removed. Also, that the Council be furnished with a survey showing the division for rezoning and the square footage in each. Rezoning requires a public hearing after 10 days publication and notice mailed to properties within 350 feet. A suggested date for such a hearing is either January 31st or February 7th. The map attached shows the zoning in this area. o Variance - Rear Yard - Front Yard Lots 9, 10 & Part of 8, Block 22, Seton Zoned Res. B - requires 6,000 sq. ft. for single family house The Planning Commission recommended a rear yard variance of 5 feet and a front yard variance of 10 feet. Also the Planning Commission recommended Galway be used as the primary front in determining set- backs. The Administration concurs with the recommendation. Variance - Street Front Lot 3 and Part of 4, Block 13, Shadywood Point Zoned A-1 10,000 Sq. Ft. The Planning Commission recommended a front yard variance of 37 feet so a garage could be built as indicated on the site plan and stipu- lated that the driveway easement should be filed with the City. The Administration concurs with the reommendation. Variance - Street Front Lot 92, Mound Shores Zoned Res. B - 6,000 Sq. Ft. required for a single family home. COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. - Page 2 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendations Because of the topography, the Planning Commission recommended the garage be built in front of the house requiring the front yard set- back to be not less than 20 feet. The Administration concurs. Planned Area Development Ordinance The Planning Commission went over the proposed ordinance. The fol- lowing was recommended: In 23.065 Paragraph b Subsection 5, add at the end: "Without a specific finding by the City that a reduction of lot size provided herein shall not adversely effect the Health, Safety and Welfare". Under Paragraph b Subsection 7, no action was taken on the Park Com- mission's recommendation which appears below: "The following motion was made, unanimously amended and approved to read as follows: Jackson moved to recommend that the PDA ordinance include a stater ment as to the portion of land to be dedicated to the City or a cash payment based on the assessed market value of the parcels of 10% of the market value of the parcels or $200 per unit, whichever is greater." Also attached is a report showing what other nearby cities request for paid dedication. There must be a public hearing to change the zoning ordinance. The hearing .could be held on either January 31st or February 7th. At this point, only one item is on the January 31st Agenda which probably will take an hour. ~,/ ~eonard L. Kopp -- Minutes MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING CO~.'U~ISSION December 22, 1977 PRESENT: Chairman Lou Oberdeck, Cklair Hasse, Helen Newell, Russ Peterson, Lorraine Jackson, Gerald Smith, Council Rep. Gordy Swenson, City Mgro Leonard Kopp, City Planner Don Levens, and Sec. Karene Uhe MINUTES The minutes from the 11/16 meeting were unanimously approved as presented. BOARD OF APPEALS MI~ WIRTZ, 3301 Warner Lane Lot 54, Whipple Shores, Map 15 Rezoning **Newell moved and Peterson seconded to recommend that the application. for division and rezoning of part of Lot 54 Whipple Shores be approved with the following stipulations: 1. East portion fronting on Warner Lane be zoned Residential B to confo~u with present zoning in adjacent blocks 6 and 19. A bond shall be posted with the city to assure that the non-conforming and deteriorating garage be removed or moved to meet the required front and side yard requirements. 2. ~est portion fronting on lakeshore with access off Waterbury Rd. shall remain Residential A-1 to conform with other lakeshore lots in the area. A space for a two car garage shall be provided at the east end of the parcel within the required side yard and setbacks. 3. A certified survey supporting the area requirements for each parcel shall be filed with the city before the date of the public hearin~o Vote was in favor, with Hasse opposed. Applicant responded to motion as sounding fair. RO?~ALD D. BAT~4AN, 2640 Galway Rd. Lot P/8,9,10, Block 22, Seton, Map 7 Street Front and Rear Yard Variances **I~ewell moved to recommend that Galway Rd. be designated as the prime frontage and presently unopened Clare Lane be considered as the secondary front for determining side yards and setbacks for Parcel 3767 in Plat 37950. The remaining two parcels in the block have access off Shannon Lane. Peterson seconded and vote was unanimous. DE~NIS DANGER/MEL BACKLIN, 1779 Wildhurst Lots 3,P/4, Block 13, Shady~;ood Pt. Street Front Variance Pa~e 2 Planning Minutes ]2/22/77 **Peterson moved to recommend that a permit be granted as requested. The side yards and setbacks meet the requiremen~s of Sec. 23.3] d-2 as amended ]0/]2/?]° A copy of the ]0 ft. drivew~y easement should be filed with the city prior to the issuance of the permit. seconded and vote %,;as uuanimous. MICHAEL FRkNCIS, 5809 Grandview Blvd. Lot 92, Mound Shores Street Front Variance **NeWe!l moved and Smith seconded to recommend that a permit be granted for a garage to be built within the side yard setbacks with a front setback of not less than 20 ft. The hedge or shrubbery planting along the street front to be cut back and kept at a height not to exceed 42 inches to prevent an adverse affect on traffic safety. Vote was unanimous. DiSCUSSiON IT~dS nOuS±~G STRATEGY - *-*Smith moved that this subject be held over for future discussion at the next discussion meeting. SUBDIVISION FEES - **Hasse moved that the city staff investigate city's actual cost for new subdivision and report fmsu~ ~s at next discussion meeting. PLAi{NED DEVELOPMENT AREA (ordinance) - After considerable discussion involving several members of the audience, **Peterson moved to forward the ordinance to city Council with the following cormments: Add to end of ~5 - Without a specific findins by the city that re- duction of lot size to less than provided herein shall not adversly affect the public health, safety, and welfare. Suggestion to add to #7 - This recreational area may be accepted by the city in leau of park dedication upon a meterm~tnatlon by the city that such recreational facilities should be adequate by the plauned development area to be served. H~sse seconded and vote was unanimous. LOT 47, RAVENSWOOD - **Ne~vell moved to deny the request to vacate the street. and vote was unauimous. Smith seconded CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 31, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. Kopp, City Manager City Inspector Report on Board of Appeals Applications 1. M~ke Wirtz, 3301 Warner Lane Lot 54, Whipple Shores There is a notable difference between the two surveys of record sub- mitted to the City; one of February 9, 1976 drawn by Registered Sur- veyor Gordon R. Coffin and the other submitted by Wirtz are notably different. I concur with the Mound City Council's Resolution 76-65 and Resolution 76-83---also that the older existing house and wood building closest to the lake shore be removed from the premises within thirty days. This would eliminate any reoccurrence of these spot zoning requests, as the last time this came before the City Council, it was deliberated for over an hour and a half. 2. Ronald D. Bateman, 2640 Galway Road I'm assuming Plan # 1 was the most favorable and agreeable for both Builder and Commission--just grant 5 foot rear yard setback, 10 foot street front setback and a street front building setback of 18 feet--- easier than changing or amending the ordinance. 3. Dennis Danger/Mel Backlin, 1779 Wildhurst Lane Accessory structure is in street front setback; does not create traffic problem; would be permissible, but is not twenty feet from right-of-way; requires a street front variance of 8 feet. Section 23.31 (b): I still think to place any structure within this setback requires a 37 foot street front variance. I don't feel the City should be involved or request a copy of the drive- way easement; that is a civil negotiation between private parties. 4. Michael Francis, 5809 Grandview Boulevard Accessory structure is in street front setback (Sec. 23.31 b). Concur with Commission, to be no less than 20 feet from street and no less than 4 foot side yard. Henry Truelsen ~' 0 ~- ~342 MAYWOOD F~OAD . TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOl'A55364 December 15, 1977 ~)4~-~]s~ TO: FROM: SUBJECT: City Manager, Leonard L, Don Levens, City Planner Survey of Public Open Space Provision for Planned Urban Residential Development Since the City of Mound is considering the adoption of an ordinance for a Planned Unit Residential Development, the staff surveyed local commun- ities which have a similar ordinance. Eden Prairie Reasonable portion of each subdivision or single family - $275. Other residential User - $200 Minnetonka Provision nOt enforced Plymouth Residential $150 per unit Shorewood Residential $250 per unit Minnetrista The greater of: (1) Proposed Dwelling Units per Acre, or (2) The Zoned Density _ Percentage of Land or Market Value to be Dedicated .20-1 2-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 13-14 15-16 5~ 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 20% 22% For each unit above 16 add 5% (Or) a cash pay- ment based upon the falr market value of the un- developed land at the listed percentage, or a combination of land and cash not exceeding the listed percentage, if in the sale. Minnetonka Beach Residential - $500 per unit Orono Dwellings per acre Number of acres per dwelling unit Percentage of land or market value to be dedicated From O 16 4 8 18 28 38 4.8 5.8 But less than More than 5 acres Percentage .16 .4 5 acres 1-1/4% .8 2 acres 2-1/2% 1.8 1 acre 10 % 2.8 1/2 acre ~1% 3.8 1/3 acre 12 % 4.8 1/4 acre 13 % 5.8 1/5 acre 14 % up 1/6 acre 15 % In no event shall the cash payment exceed $1,000.00 per dwelling unit or be less than $250.00 per dwelling unit. eou~u~.pao pssocio~cI - ~.~¥' ~u~z,loIeAej pauu~-[cI se azI uoz. sSAspqttS X~ eq.~.zo~S ~ussaoH ~0155fi0 ss~oMs puuo~{ ¢86 %u!od pooz'nfP~qS cfi ~tooI~ ~'~/d cf s%°~I ~I d~f saaoq~ eldd~i ¢~[~ ~o~ 'I xo~ ~puo2v A ICATION FOR VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE OWNER LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY PLAT 3 ') ?~'(.). PARCEL ~J-~"' -- TELEPHONE H'~Zj . '~,~ V ./~f~~ 7~ ?/~/o~, .. ¢¢ Applicant's Interest in Property State why this use, if granted, would not be contrary to the general purp nd intent of the ordinance to secure public health, safety, general welfare, and sub- ~---,~t_a nt i a I justice. / ~,~'~ /~l,l Residents and owners o[property within feet: · :' ~INDSOR J~ ...... I~ -*~-~ ~ ,,, ,o ,,.,,., ,... ,..:,~, L~- ' :* ~l ! WATERBURY ONDON £I£55 'N~q N.,qSSIIHN~IIID 99[ XOfl NldlNN~H ~O AINQOD ~tOS~NNIN '~NQON S2t~OHS ~IddlHM ~5 AO% We propose to divide Lo% 54 into two parcels so as to conform to zoning requirements as set forth in Chapter 22, Platting and Subdivision Regulations, Part C, page 3, Section 22.33. Section 22.33 Lot Sizes Residence lots in a subdivision shall have an average of 10,000 sq. ft. per lot with minimums of 8,000 square feet..." (Exhibit A) The proposed lakeshore lot will have 10,092 +/- sq. ft. while the hillside or upper lot will have 8,082 +/- sq. ft. Section 22.33 "In the case of lakeshore or topographical conditions making irregular shaped lots necessary, the widths at one of the lot ends must not be less than 80 feet and the width of the other lot end must not be less than 20 feet." (Exhibit A) The dimension of the lakeshore lot will be 42.50' x 180' x 80' x 222'. Further, the upper lot of 8,082 sq. ft. woul.d be less than 8% of the Whipple Shores Block 25 subdivision. Section 22.03 Exceptions. "a. Nothing in this ordinance shall prohibit the subdivision, replatting, or conveyance by metes and bounds descriptions of any parcel of land less than the size, width or length require= ments as provided in Section 22.33." (Exhibit A) Since we have met the Section 22.03 requirements, we request the public hearing be waived. Section 22.00 Paragraph 5 ."The public hearing refered to in the foregoing paragraph may be waived by the Village Council if the purpose of said division or conveyance by metes and bounds description is within the exceptions contained in Section 22.03 of this Chapter and/or if a waiver is granted under the provisions of Section 22.04 of this Chapter." Further... Section 22.04 Variances: "The Village Council may grant a variance from the regulations contained in Chapter 22 of the Village Code following a finding that all of the following conditions.exist;" 22.04, Part a, 1. "There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property, such that the strict application of.the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land." (Exhibit B) Since Lot 54 has two habitable homes on one lot that existed long before the Village Ordinances; the property as it now stands is one of non-conforming use thus depriving the owner of reasonable use of the land because of the following... Division 2 Chapter 23 Page 22 23.20 Non-Conforming Uses, Provisions and Limitations "The lawful use of a building or premises as of December 20, 1945 may be continued, although such does not conform to the provisions hereof. Such use may be extended through the building provided no structural alterations are made therein other than those required by law or ordinance," a. This means the owner cannot improve either hcme beyond the minimal standards which in the case of the Lakeside home is barely adequate. Also such things as adding new roofs, tuck-under garages, extensive remodeling, grading and landscaping of the property would be impossible at this time. b'. Should permission be gained to improve the property as previously outlined, but not altering the non-conforming use, '~he following would make this impractical. Paragraph 7 of Section 23.20 states "no building %~hich does not conform to the requirements of the use district in which it is located, and which is thus partially damaged or destroyed to the extent of fifty percent or more, may be rebuilt or reconstructed" Thus, either of the two homes along with improvements, time and money would be a total loss, if they were destrcyed by fire, earthquake, wind, water or explosion. Section 22.04 a. "2. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner." The variance is necessary to improve the property to the point where it is out of the "slum level", update and refurbish the structure and properties to the point where the owner would enjoy 'and be proud to live. With these improvements, separate mortgages could be issued., thus two families not just one, could enjoy the benefits of home owning. Section 22.04 a. "3. The granting of ~he variance will not be detrimental to the pubtic'welfare or injurious to the other property in the territory in which said property is situated and will not have an adverse effect upon traffic or traffic safety." The proposed change would not be det'rimental or injurious in any way because it will not change any acess or traffic pattern. Section 22.04 b. conditions "1. The proposed project will constitue a desirable and stable community developement." As stated earlier, we propose to improve this property to the point where instead of having trans-tenants living there, there will be stable family home owners. "2. The proposed project will be in harmony with adjacent areas." As outlined earlier, the owner will improve the homes to the level of the homes in the adjacent area. Plus the owner plans to continue wooden retaining walls and landscaping that now exists on Lots 55, 56, and 57. This will not only be ecstatically desirable, but would also improve property values in this area which course would increase the tax base. In conclusion, we respectfully request the following... 1. Divide Lot 54 into t%~ p~rcels of 10,092 +/- sq. ft. for the Lakeshore lot and 8,082 +/- sq. ft. for %he Cliffside lot (Exhibit A) and... 2. Maintain the Residential A-1 Single Family for the Lakeshore' lot and... 3. Zone the Cliffside lot A-1 though it is some what short of the 10,000 sq. ft. but is well over 6,000 (A-2/B) or... 4, Zone the Cliffside lot Residential A-2 Single Family (6,000 sq. ft.) Hill was 93 j , 9~ 9-1o-76 RESOLUTION NO. 76 - 65 RESOLUTIO~ REFERRING TKE RFJ~UF~T TO SUBDIVIDE LOT 54 ~HIPPLE SHORES INTO TWO lfJILDINO SITES BACK TO THE FLANN/}~G CO?4~RISSION WITH CONDITIONS AND STIFULATIONS WHE. ~REAS, o~mers of property described as Lot 54, WhipPle Shores have requested %he subdivision of land, and I'~q{ERF_~S, propzrty presently have existin9 non-conforming use,. and '~PHEREAS, there are two single family dwellings on a lot approximately 14,950 square feet, that is zoned A-1 Residential NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That present request for subdivision of land be referred bpck to the P12nnin§ Commission for conditions ~nd stip- ulations. Feasability of rezoning that part of Lot 54 abutting Warner Road to the Residential Use District A-2. A-2 zonin§ would.be compatible with zoning to the north and east. Both structures c6nstructed under permits issued by Iulan~ Park and is a unique situation by creating special circtur, stances affecting property & variance appears necessary for preservation & enjoyment'of substantial property ri§hts. Adopted by the Council this lOth day of February, 1976. 76-83 3-9-76 m SOLUr -o 76 - RESOL~ION TO DENY THE SUBDIVISION OF ~ 54, ~ipple Shores (Non-co~o~ng use of ~d be t~ non-co~o~f~ use sites i~tead of one) ~S~ p~pe~y described ss ~t 54~ ~ipple Shores is zoned A-1 for ~0~000 sq:. ft~ ~ ~~ by plat meas~ment p~pe~y has 15~R17.14 sq.~ ~ ~d now has t~ habitable st~ct~es on the lot~ ~d ~S~ t~ st~cb~es on lot ~e this p~pe~y one of non-co~o~i~ use~ ~d ~8~ the request for a di~sion of l~d ~o~d reset in each parcel bei~ ~dersized for A-1 zoni~: Parcel A ~d have 9~0 sq:~ ~. Parcel B ~d have ~lO0 sq., ~. IOW~ ~~ BE ~ ~OL~D BY ~E C~ OF ~ ~ ~S~A: ~at the subdivision of ~t 54, ~ipple Sho~s ~e denied. ~at the non-co~o~ ~e ~d reset in t~ non-con- fo~ ~e sites i~tead of one. Adopted by the Couucil this 9th day of 5~rch, 1976. ?lnt of Su:~.'ey for Fred [5.' and Viola Hill of Lot SA, Whipple Shores Hennepin County, ;4innesota RoAD Cortificate of Su~wey: I hereby ceftin%, that Il,is is a corr~, re?resenimtlon cf a sm~-ey of th. bo~d,~ries of r,~,, ~+,~' ~ippl2 Shores, and of the location of all b,~ldings there(,n~ am4 all wisible ~ncroaehments, if any~ from or on sa:~d land. A~ ,.r.at osrt of Lo% ~/, %.~ioole Shores, lv~n~- 7lc. sterl,- of the following- described line: Coi~3~avclng ~t. '.h~- ?:ort}~east nc'?ner of said lot; thence Westerly alonf~ the ?~orther!i lin~ o~ sai.] lot a distance' of 102 Feet to the point of ~gin- ninj of t~e line l~,'n.,:~ dgscr~]>~c]; ~:cnee ti~flcei.[n~[ left ?~,o~,,',. ~3 to the South line of said !ot~ nnd t},ere endinC. said lot ,'. · ~:es~r: Ccrm:encing at thc .,orta- east cc, rner Of ' ; [o ~; %1 ' " S:~lC . .,,-nee ,.,es _ a~on,, . Northcrl/ l~rAe of said =o~ a dis'ta/,~e of l~2 Peet t~ the point of b~.~.n,.ln;' ~.~e linu i>eing described; thence deflee,-~.,,._,. !eft ~oo~o,,, ~., to the :~c. ut' '._.~Dt, Of 3~id lot, :~:~ f~ePe ~din~. ~;e,ile: 1" : ~' ~r2,,n 2. CoY, in [~eg.g~. 6064 ~.~,.'b=, ~ : , - ~-/o b~r,~ :;m"veyor and Flanner I I 0 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME OF APPLICANT INTEREST IN PROPERTY PROPERTY ~~~. ADDRESS ~ ~ ~0 . .~_ . PLAT _'_~7~5'~0 PARCEL -~'~Z Telephone FEE OWNER (if other than applicant)~L~ '~'-~.~b ¥'~%~'r,~_[ ~ Telephone Address ~, ~,~bdS,~ .~ ~ ~K~ ~Number _V~klRff_A Nf~ E _RJE QUE S T E D: ~, ~,,~/ 'NOTE: 'FRONT YARD. I ~~~L N ~ FT. YARD F LOT SIZE _ ~/30 FT, YARD ~ FT... FOOTAGE 1. AtLach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2_. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. ~_. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. OTHER (describe) /A building permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the .-.council resolution or variance granted becomes null and void. '. 87 ] .~/:~ ,-'-... variances' a, re not.t-ffl~ns?~rable. .I~N~NG COMMZSSION RECOMMENDATION COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO._. ~AT~ '0 30' ?la t of Su.~;oy for konald D. in ~t.s .< - H~:',nepin Coonty, M, inneso t~ 1" = 30' 17-2'2-77 Irop ~.~ rker I h~r,;by c~r~i~.: that this is ~ true aud'cc-rrect repre- sen~t~on o.t' a ':u~,o.' of the bo~:]arles of the West 70 feot of .~ots g, 9, a~d 10, Block 22, Ze~n, the ~ocation of all e~.~tinj buiidiugs, ~f any~ bhureor, ~nd thc. pressed Io- -e~biun of ~ proposed building. It docs not 'o~.-ort to show other i:,%~roy~m~:nts or encroach- ' ' ;.Linne :-; o t~ 8O -£ APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE CITY OF MOUND ZONING PROPERTY Telephone .-VAPJ_kNGE REQUESTED: NOTE: 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing ~"'%~R~¢¢'r ' .- : :i ACCESSORY '' ....[ s~owing local, on o~ proposed improvement on,property and abutting streets. ,.. ~ ~/~ ~ Give owners~p and dimensions of SID~ [ [ ~[~~ [ ~joining property. Sho~ appro~mate YARD ~ FT%[ LOT SIZE ~ locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application N. C. U.* or OTHER (des c~ibe) extending survey or drawing. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward r~que st. -_ A building permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the ~ /_~.~_"".eg_u~Cll reso_lC&e~or variance,.c~r~nted becomes null and void, ---%'.'°: r . ~ ,/ .[ PLANING COM~S~ION RECOMMENDATION ['~ DATE jCOUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO.. ~9 909 a~u"a~ld pu~ .zoi~aS pu'~i ~a:;'[..') 'f ,u~iV .) / :/! / / ! / / / / / / /. APPLIcANT ~."k[\.P~t), _O.d APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE CITY OF MOUND ZONING PROPERTY ,LOT ~o,2~ ~. B LOCK Tele phone INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address telephone REQUESTED: ' .:' ' J ACCESSORY NOTE: FT.] YARD . FT. FOOTAGE N. C. U. * or OTHER (des cribe) REASON FOR REQUEST:: 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of ail buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3.. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. A building permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the coanciI resolution or variance granted be. aomes null and void. Variances are not transferaJ~le.~ /~ f"~/_ . . APPLICANT ~~o/~'~z./~/~/~,n~o DATEL /~/~ ~ P ~ignatur~ ---'~ ~' ~'if' fl'; f~ ~?7' DATE Id 5 b:N'~-f-/'-'; P['C TION~3 RESOLUTION NO.. DATE !/ ././' · '0~ NVAH '1' NHOr CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 4, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-1 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Organizational Meeting At the organizational meeting on January 10, 1978, it is necessary to do the following: (A suggested resolution for each item is attached.) 1. Designate Acting Mayor 2. Authorize Signing of Checks 3. Appoint Health Officer 4. Designate Official Newspaper 5. Designate Official Depositories 6. Inspect Depository Collateral 7. Appoint Planning Commission Members 8. Appoint Councilman to Planning Commission 9. Appoint Advisory Park Commission Members 10. Appoint Councilman to Advisory Park Commission 11. Appoint Human Rights Commission Member 12. Appoint Councilman to Human Rights Commission 13. Appoint Youth Commission Members 14. Appoint Councilman to Youth Commission 15. Approve Bond for Clerk-Treasurer 16. Establish Meeting Dates 17. Participate in Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 18. Appoint a member to West Hennepin Human Services Board 19. Appoint members to Western Area Fire Training Association 20. Appoint Councilmen to Fire Committee 21. Appoint Councilmen to Police Committee 22. Appoint Representative to Suburban Rate Authority 23. Council Memorandum 78-9 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION DESIGNATING AS ACTING MAYOR FOR 1978 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be designated and named as Acting Mayor for the City of Mound'for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson ~ Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Note: Gordon Swenson was Acting Mayor in 1977. 2 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, THE CITY MANAGER, THE CITY CLERK-TREASURER AND THE ACTING MAYOR TO SIGN CHECKS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That all checks drawn on City Funds be signed by the Mayor, the City Clerk-Treasurer and the City Manager, and in the absence of the Mayor, the Acting Mayor shall sign the checks during the year. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston novaasen So carried and resolved. 3 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING DR. KENNETH ROMNESS AND DR. CHARLES V. CARLSON AS CITY HEALTH OFFICERS FOR 1978 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That Dr. Kenneth Romness and Dr. Charles V. Carlson be named City Health Officers of the City of Mound for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. 4 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - AS THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR THE YEAR 1978 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be, and hereby is designated ~he official newspaper of the City of Mound for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Note: 1. Sun - Attached is a copy of a letter from the Sun. 2. Laker - Attached is a copy of a letter from the Laker. 7~ December 20, 1977 SUN NEWSPAPERS 6601 WEST SEVENTY-EIGHTH STREET EDINA, t.A IN N, 554.35 · 941-4800 City Council City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN. 55364 Gentlemen: Your designation of the Lake Minnetonka Sun to be your official newspaper for the year 1978 will be most appreciated. The rate for legal publications as set by,Minnesota law is 20.5¢ per line for the first insertion, 13.6¢ per line for each subsequent insertion. Tabular matter, i.e., proper names, numbers, legal descriptions, etc., is 6.9~ per line additional for the original insertion with no additional charge for repeats of the original insertion. We will provide, at no additional charge, two notarized affidavits on each of your publications. Additional notarized affidavits, on request, will be furnished at 25¢ each. In order to help avoid delays in publishing your notices, we must establish the following procedure which will require your anticipating council action. Your official notices should be pre-prepared and in our office on the Friday before your council meeting (we will pick up the notices between 3 and 4 P.M. on Friday). We will set the type in advance, but you will be able to change the date or withdraw the full notice before 11 A.M. on Tuesday by calling our superintendent, Mr. Ken Ploof. We will not be albe to make major changes or additions in the notice nor accept any substitutions. In order to expedite our services to you, it is requested that you direct your publications to the attention of Cicely Moon, Legal Department, 6601W. 78th Street, Edina, MN. 55435. Thank you for your consideration of this, our official application for designa- tion of the Lake Minnetonka Sun as your official newspaper for the ensuing year. Very truly yours, SUN NEWSPAPERS, INC. VExecutive Vice President JRR-cw THE LAI ER Box 82, Mound, Minn. 55364 _0~r Offi~,~s Are Located At: 557! ~ ~' ~- ' Nound Jan. 5, 1928 To: The City of Hound Re£. Publication oi' 1. ega! notices for 1978 Members of_ the City Council: ohms year to serve The Laker would like again 4_ · as the City of Ho~rad's legal newspaper. Of a total paid circ'u!ation of some l?00, 915 are sold within the Nound city limits -- 625 o£ those to subscribers, and an average of 2~t-0 per week on newsstsaads within the city. We believe o::ao u,.~e Lake? does a good job of servmng -' ~ ' -' ~ r 3. ega! ' ~ ~l~ eit2rls- ltee~l~ as !a_ as publication ms ooncePleed~ and would, ae~>:2eciate %he opport~ity to continue to do so. fO_ 3.~OD.P con,_-l,!eraololl and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION DESIGNATING OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES FOR CITY FUNDS AND REQUIRING APPROPRIATE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the following banks be designated as official depositories of City Funds, and the maximum amount that may be deposited in said banks in 1978. Amount State Bank of Mound $650,000 plus 40 M FIDC plus $100,000 FIDC for Savings Account and Certificates of Deposit First National Bank of Minneapolis $300,000 plus 40 M FIDC plus $100,000 FIDC for Savings Account and Certificates of Deposit First National Bank of Navarre $200,000 plus 40 M FIDC plus $100,000 FIDC for Savings Account and Certificates of Deposit Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan, Mound $100,000 MFS & LIC Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. 6 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78- RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK- TREASURER TO INSPECT DEPOSITORY COLLATERAL BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the Mayor and City Clerk-Treasurer be and hereby are directed to inspect the collateral assigned by the depositories. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. 7 its adoption. offered the following resolution and moved seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING AS MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMIS- SION FOR THREE YEAR TER~iS AND FOR A TWO YEAR TERM BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That , and be appointed to the Mound Planning Commission for a term of three years and be appointed to the Mound Planning Commission for a term of two years to fill the unexpired term of Frank Weiland. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. The terms of the following expire: 1. Gerald Smith 2. Cklair Hasse Also the following have resigned and should be replaced: 1. Louis Oberdeck - Term expires Jan. 1, 1978 2. Frank Weiland - Term expires Jan. 1, 1980 moved its adoption. offered the following resolution and seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION NAMING COUNCILMAN ~v~-v-~-, AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE WITH THE PLANNING COM- MISSION FOR 1978 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be named Council Representa- tive to the Planning Commission for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson ~/'~' Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Councilman Swenson was the Council Representative last year. and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING , AND AS MEMBERS OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION FOR THREE YEAR TERMS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That , and be appointed as members of the Mound Advisory Park Commission for three year terms. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. The terms of the following expire: 1. Tony Case 2. Dale Johnson 3. Sandra Smith (Resigned) 10 moved its adoption. offered the following resolution and seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - OL TION OUNCIL AS THE COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE WITH ADVISORY PARK COM- MISSION FOR 1978 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be named Council Representative on the Advisory Park Commission for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Councilman Withhart was the Council Representative last year. 11 moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING , AND TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF MOUND, MINNETRISTA AND SPRING PARK BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL~ CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen That and be appointed for a term of three years and be appointed for the un- expired term of Steve Sundberg to the Human Rights Commission of Mound, Minnetrista and Spring Park. So carried and resolved. The terms of Sue Scarborough and Sandra Andrews expired December 31, 1977. The other term to be filled is: Steve Sundberg resigned. Term expires December 31, 1979. The other members are: Barbara Stuth to December 31, 1978 Ruth Wyman to December 31, 1978 12 moved its adoption. offered the following resolution and seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - SOL iON COUNCILM AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE WITH HUMAN RIGHTS COM- MISSION OF MOUND, MINNETRISTA AND SPRING PARK BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be named Council Representative to the Human Rights Commission of Mound, Minnetrista and Spring Park for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Councilman Withhart was the Council Representative last year. 13 moved its adoption. offered the following resolution and seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE MOUND YOUTH COMMISSION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the following adults be appointed to the Mound Youth Com- mission for a term of three years: 1) 2) Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. The terms of the following adult members expired December 31, 1977: Carolyn Donahue (Resigned) John Fitzgerald (Resigned) 14 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION NAMING CO~CI~,~ ~ ~A-~-~ AS COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE WITH MOUND YOUTH COMMISSION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be named Council Representative to the Mound Youth Commission for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Councilman Polston was Council Representative last year. 15 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPROVING CITY CLERK-TREASURER'S BOND BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the bond of City Clerk-Treasurer Mary Marske for one year be approved. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. OFFICIAL BOND, M. $. A. SECTION 574.13 READ INSTRUCTIONS ON THIRD PAGE BOND # 400 EW 138( of the County of. .................. H_..E..N_N_.EP..!_N. ........................................ , and St~t~ of Minnesota, c~s principal, and ST. PAUL FIRI= AND MARINI= INSURANCI= COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, with its principal office in the City of St, Paul, Minnesota, assurety are jointly and severally held and firmly bound to the State of Minnesota in the sum of lawful m°n~ of the United States, to the paFment of which, well and truly to be made, we hereb~ bind our- selves, and each of us, our, and each of our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assifns, firmly by these presents: ............................ o CLERK/TREASURER FOR THE C It-~ OF' IMOUND ~ ~c~pal tco. s ~reto.9~re duly APPOINTED ~o th~ oJ~ce ~. ........................................................................... i~ ~ in and for the Co~z,zty of ..................... HE._N_N.E.P...I.~ ................................... a,,d S~te of Minneao~. ~/ shall faithfully and impartially, in all things, during his continuance in off~ce, perform the duties thereof without fraud, deceit ~ oppression, and pay over without delay to the o2Twer entitled blt law thereto all moneys which shall corse into his hands by virtue thereof, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain ~full force and effect. THIS BOND I$ EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 15)77, AND EXPIRES JULY 1~ 1278- ' Seated ~gth our seals and dated this ......!.~.T...H.. ................... day or JULY 77 ¢- ............................................. A. D. IO ........ MARS MARSKE .......................................................................... ST. PaUL__ ..... FIRE._~AND MARINE INSURANCE · /,. ;; , .f ,-' ,~ : , ,:~, .. '~ JUDITH L, J~HNSTON~ Attorney iff"f~ctl 11526 E,I. 4-56 16 moved its adoption. offered the following resolution and seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING MEETING DATE AND ADOPTING RULES OF PROCEDURE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That th ccn~.~ h Tuesday of each month be, and here- by are established as the regular meeting dates of the City Council of the City of Mound for the year 1978, and that Roberts Rules of Order be, and hereby are adopted as the rules of procedure for the City Council for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. 17 moved its adoption. offered the following resolution and seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION NAMING . ~7-~,~ f,~/~-'~ AS DELEGATE TO ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES AND NAMING -~O~v-~, ' AS ALTERNATE DELEGATE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be appointed as the delegate to the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities for the year 1978, and that be named the alter- nate delegate. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and'resolved. Mayor Lovaasen has been the delegate and Leonard Kopp, the alternate delegate. 18 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING TO WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES BOARD FOR A TERM OF TWO YEARS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be appointed to the West Hennepin Human Services Board for a term of two years. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Charles Peterson has resigned. His term expires January 31, 1979. The other member is Pat Maltz to January 31, 1979. 19 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING ~ AND TO THE WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINIIqG ASSOCIATION FOR A TERM O~ ONE YEAR. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That and be appointed to the Western Area Fire Training Association for a term of one year. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Members appointed last January were: Robert A. Cheney Ray Tharalson (one of the two must be a fireman) 2O and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING · AND ~ TO SERVE ON THE FIRE COMMITTEE FOR THE YEAR 1978 WHEREAS, existing Fire Contracts with neighboring communities require a committee of two Councilmen to be appointed to meet with similar committees from contracting communities, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNE- SOTA: That and be appointed to serve on the Fire Committee for the year 1978. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson ~ Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Mayor Lovaasen and Councilman Swenson served last year. 21 and moved its adoption. offered the following resolution seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING ~ AND 3 -- ~ ~ TO SERVE ON THE POLICE COMMITTEE FOR THE YEAR 1978 WHEREAS, existing Police Contracts with neighboring communities require a committee of two Councilmen to be appointed to meet with a similar committee from contracting communities, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That and be appointed to serve on the Police Committee for the year 1977. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Mayor Lovaasen and Councilmen Fenstad and Swenson served last year. 52 22 its adoption. offered the following resolution and moved seconded. RESOLUTION NO. 78 - RESOLUTION APPOINTING ~ ~ REPRESENTATIVE TO THE SUBURBAN RATE A~JTHORITY AND NAMING ?k ,'k - ~ ' AS ALTERNATE AS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That be appointed as Mound's representative to the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1978 and that be named the alternate. Roll Call Vote: Fenstad Swenson Withhart Polston Lovaasen So carried and resolved. Leonard Kopp was representative in 1977 and Barbara Heyman, alternate. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 6, 1978 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-9 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Prosecuting Attorney Some Councilmen have indicated they might wish to consider changing Prosecuting Attorneys. Attached is a resume and a letter from Timothy L. Piepkorn. He has indi- cated that he will do the City's prosecuting for a retainer of $300 per month for the first 15 hours' work and charge $30 per hour for all time over 15 hours. The present prosecutor is paid $300 per month and charges $40 per hour for all work over 15 hours in a month. During 1977, the 15 hours was exceeded four times: $45.00 in January, $340.00 in June, $85.00 in Octo- ber and $140.00 in November--making a total of $610.00 additional payments. The present prosecutor will be willing to do the 1978 work on the same basis as 1977. ($300 per month plus $40 per hour for work in excess of 15 hours) The Administration has no reason to recommend a change in prosecution; the work has been good; the Police find him good to work with and the costs are not excessive. However, there have been indications that some Councilmen feel a change in prosecutors should be made. The Adminis- tration's recommendation is to keep the present prosecutor. If the Council does wish to concur with that recommendation, then the alternate recommendation would be Timothy Piepkorn or, if a change is made, it is recommended that it be effective February 1. t~e.~nard L. Kopp ATTORNEY AT LAW 1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55454 612/333.5419 December 7, 1977 Dear Mr. KOpp and the Mound City Council: I am writing this letter to express my interest in the Mound City Prosecuting Attorney position. By way of background, I grew up in Mound and graduated from Mound High School. I attended Augsburg College and the University of Minnesota Law School. Atttached please find my resume and a letter of recommendation from Professor Melvin B. Goldberg. As my resume indicates, I have had an interest in criminology for several years. While at Augsburg College I assisted in classes taught at Stillwater State Prison. In Law School I was a student director for the Law School clinical pro- gram Legal ASsistance to Minnesota Prisoners. Further, I have an attachment to the Mound lake area and its citizens. Currently I am associated with the law firm Ekola & Rose in Minneapolis. I also have a law office in Mound where I am at on Fridays and other times by appointment. Frankly, I find it difficult to quote what I would reasonabls want to be paid and I am willing to Begotiate. However, for purposes of consideration I would suggest a $300.00 retainer a month which would cover 15 hours of my time. Anything over this amount I would charge my normal rate of $30.00 an hour. Thanking you in advance for your consideration I remain, Very truly yours, TIMOTHY L. PIEPKORN TLP:emf TIMOTHY L. PIEPKORN 1770 Hennepin Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55403 Phone: 377-3708 OFFICE '1503 Washin~-~on Avenue South Minneapolis, Mn 55454 Phone' 333-5419 OBJECTIVE Seeking responsible, challenging position utilizing educational and work experience in the following areas: CREDENTIALS Juris Doctor Degree from University of Minnesota Law School,(Top Quartile); B.A. degree from Augsburg College, (Magna cum laude in three years). ACCOMPLISHMENTS: JOB RELATED ERISA (1974 Pension Reform Act) Interpretive Expertise Conversion Pension and Profit Sharing PRIVATE PRACTICE ENCOMPASSING: Criminal Title VII Corporate Law Real Estate Probate Domestic Relations Estate Planning STUDENT DIRECTOR FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE TO MINNESOTA PRISONERS-- while in law school Exposure to Federal and State Courts Teaching Responsibilities Liason Between Inmates and Prison Administrators Civil and Criminal Litigation Supervised Case Loads of Law Students EDUCATION Augsburg College, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55q04 Major: Political Science Degree: B.A., 1972 magna cum laude (graduated in three years) Activities and Honors: Member of Alpha Tau Sigma fraternity; active in Project Involvement (Y~ICA program for inner-city children); member of Timia Society (Honor Society); 1972 recipient of Department of Political Science Scholarship Special emphasis: Internal politics, the problems confronting urbanization, and criminology (involved in classes taught at Stillwater State Prison) University of Minnesota Law School- 1975 graduate Activities: Student-director of Legal Aid to Minnesota Prisoners--clinical program associated with the law school; duties as Student-director included: assigning and supervising the case loads of students; arranging and administering interviews at Stillwater State Prison; working on cases assigned; acting as a liason between inmates and prison administrators. G.P.A.: 11.7 (B)in academic classes; 13 (B+) in legal writing; 14 (A) in legal aid LEGAL EXPERIENCE Associate Attorney with Ekola, Rose, Piepkorn, and Latham in the general practice of law. Associate Attorney with Soules and Hynes from April, 1976- April, 1977; areas of law included corporate, real estate, probate, domestic relations and criminal. Employed by Connecticut General Life Insurance Company converting pension and profit-sharing plans to comply with the 1974 Pension Reform Act (ERISA). Law Clerk for Legal Aid to Minnesota Prisoners; active in cases involving dissolution proceedings, name changes, institutional Due Process hearing, child custody,Wrongful Death action, 1973 suit in federal court, Habeas Corpus Petition in federal court, Title VII action, detainers, Deportation proceedings. uNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · Legal Assistance to Minnesota Prisoners (LAMP) '. Law School 206 T.N.M. Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 (612) 376-3353 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Tim Piepkorn Mr. Piepkorn has asked me to set forth my evaluation of him for prospective · employers. It is a great pleasure for me to advise the reader of this letter that Mr. Piepkor~. is a bright, sensitive Young man who worked diligently in our clinical program entitled Legal Assistance to Minnesota Prisoners for almost two years, first as a student in the project and late~ assuming the responsibility of student director in our Stillwater Prison setting. In that setting >k. Piepkorn proved that he' could work with people of all walks of life, from judges and lawyers to clients of the lowest socio -economic background, He is honest, forthright' and diligent and will undoubtedly become a leader in the Bar. I would therefore recou~nend that >~r-. Piepkorn be considered seriously for any position open to him. I would be happy to answer any additional inquiries by phone or letter should that be necessary. Sincerely yours, ? . _ Melvin B. Goldberg Associate Professor of Law Director LAMP sm ON L,AKE ~iiNNE'II'ONKA INDIAN BURIAL NOUNDB 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 January 6, 1978 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police City Prosecutor, Gary Phleger It is highly recommended that Mr. Gary Phleger be again contracted as the Mound Prosecuting Attorney. OHer the past years as a police officer I have dealt with dozens of prosecutors, both very good to incompetent, and Mr. Phleger is without a doubt one of the best. His demonstrated knowledge, skills and ability to work well with the police is second to none. Within the criminal justice system or chain the most important link is between the police and the prosecutor. It is absolutely necessary to have open communication and trust to be effective. This communication takes time to build and is present at this time between the police and Mr. Phleger. In the 10 months I have been with the city I have yet to hear Mr. Phleger ever criticized or second guessed by any of the officers. On the contrary, they continually remark on his competence both in writing complaints and his ability to prosecute. I have personally dealt with Mr. Phleger on numerous occasions and not only always find his assistance competent, but also find he is readily available and always willing to do the little extra things that assist the department. For example, he has given input on training and volunteered his own time to train. His professional skills and attitude are definately a plus for the citizens of Mound and the police department. Also of concern is the need for continued continuity in police prosecution. At this time Mr. Phleger is also the prosecutor for our sister cities of Mtnnetrista and Spring Park. Having one prosecutor is time saving and convenient for both record keeping amd contimuity in prosecution. Respectfully, Chief of Police CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 28, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-7 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Parking Variance Attached is a request for a Parking Variance for the month of January at 5027 Edgewater Drive. The variance is recommended providing the car is parked to the extreme right side of the road in front of the above address. City of Mound Date ,, h - .)O '72 VARIANCE REQUESTs OFF STREET PARKING OP~DINANCE PHO~ - Horn. ~)~- ~ 3 '7 %- Business APPX. APPOIN~-~NT Ti~ FOR ON SITE INSPECTION A.M. P.M. R~.~S & RECO~.2,E~OATICNS~Y I;~IV~UiL ~BKING INSPECTION I~II_rD.=L MIKING INSPECTION & IDENTIFICATION SIGNA~FRE OF ' "~ 1-10-78 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 4, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78 - 8 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Tuxedo Easement - Lot 14, Block 6, Arden The owners of Lot 14 and Part of Lot 15, Block 6, Arden, have consented to an easement for Tuxedo Boulevard on the following terms: Permanent Easement 1350 Sq. Ft. Temporary Easement 3200 Sq. Ft. 1 Tree $675.00 320.00 100.00 $1,095.00 In addition to the above, they request: A building variance. The present lot (Lot 14 and Part of Lot 15) has in excess of 10,000 square feet; after the 1,350 square foot easement, the lot will be less than the 10,000 square feet required for a building site. According to our figures, the present site has 10,643.68 square feet; after taking 1,350 square feet, the site will have 9293.68 square feet. 2. That an elm tree just off the slope easement on Lot 14 be cut down as part of the project. 3. That a driveway entrance for Lot 14 be made 5 feet east of the west lot line when Tuxedo is constructed. The above is recommended. cc: Ray Klanderud McCombs-Knutson J. Reinitz / / I CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 29, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-3 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Tax Forfeit Land - Lots 17, 18 & 19, Block 9, Whipple The City has held Lots 17, 18 and 19, Block 9, Whipple off sale because the rear portion is wet and it was unknown if a house could be built on the lots. Attached is a copy of a letter requesting to purchase all or a part of the lots in order to build a garage. A copy of the aerial photograph of these lots is attached and it appears that there is probably enough room for a garage in front of the wetlands. In all likelihood, the northerly 75 feet of Lot 18 could be released for sale. Or, if the Council would rather, the City could buY a lot and resell a portion for the garage. The aerial photograph shows that on Lots 17 and 18, the front 100 feet are above the swamp. L~'~nard L. Kopp }ZR. KOPP I am interested in purchasing one or more lots currently owned by the city of g~ot~nd. The lots in ouestinn lie directly across the street from my home at 5148 Tuxedo Blvd. and I intend to use them for the purpsse of constructing a detached garage. The lots in vihich I am interested are : LOTS I7 , I8 , I9 BLOCK 9 ~,:.Y home is located on : LOT I6 WHIPPLE~n°~'~,.~,.~ ADDITION i am interrested in. t~owing : (x) (2) (3) WHIPDLE ADDITION Is the city interrested in~ selling one or more of these lots ~ If so , ho¥~ would the selling price be determined and/or how would the lots be offered for sale. ~Vhat restrictions woul8 be placed on the lots as a condition of sale. T ~hank you for your attention to this matter.. RIC~RD D. KOPP 5148 T~EDO BLVDo I<O~.~D , ~,~I~,~. 55364 TELE. Home 472-356I ~Vork 870-6720 X CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 29, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-4 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Tax Forfeit Land - Lots 1 and 2, Block 14, Whipple The attached map shows in yellow the land the City owns near the big swamp in the Whipple and Devon Subdivisions. In addition to that in yellow, Lots 1 and 2, Block 14, Whipple, are tax forfeit. The aerial map shows these lots to be high ground, but since the City is attempting to get as much of the swamp area as possible, probably we should hold these as park land until we see what develops. ~ L~onard L. Kopp ~' "' F' "' ") "~ "r' i ~ 7 F~! ~ n ~ ~ ~s ~2 ,, ,~ s' ~' ~' .~"2 " · ' ·~q ~ ~ t:'~.,. ::;: PARKERS LANE ..... .... ~ .,-"~ -; --.- ~. -., .I.O . -.-.,,,~ ';~" '' '11 ....... -'- ....... '~ ~ : L ..... ' "1 ,~ [~',%:-': ..... :~/ :~"-' "b- ~, . . . ~'~--15 '; -// .... ,-- .- ....~:~t'-'-~--'. '-: 't5 ..... ~ '"~" '~' ':' W NDSOR - ~ ,f PLA~L ' "I~ '~": .... ~""' '-'--~--' IT-~=--~''~t ~: - '-: I~ -~ ~'~'~- '-~: ..... WATERBURY ~PLACE _.. , . .... ., . ~.~ 13 14 15 · 19 ,?- '" 20'": ":J ..................... :_ ' D ~ .... I0~ ~ 7- 6 5-4+ 3. ~ t~9 8 7 6 5 4-3-~ I.'. ~ 26~--~ ~, ~.%:-~ .. .--, ~. .... .2' ~ ~, .,~ / . ;' .;~'.., ' ? ~ ,~o ~ ~ ,. ~ , .;. ~,~ _ . · ~ ~- - .' -~ ~,--7 AKa' Meeting of 1-10-78 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 21, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78 - 5 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council City Manager Plans & Specifications for Sanitary Sewer Inspection The City Council has received a copy of the Plans and Specifications for Sanitary Sewer Inspection. A resolution approving the Plans and Specifications and ordering bids is required. ,ar i. p ~ ~ /X \ CITY OF MOUND MoundI Minnesota December 27, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78 - 6 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and The City Manager Fire Equipment - Bids City Council The Fire Department has sought bids on hose, boots and nozzles. The bids received were: Company 6 Pair 4 Akron 400 Ft. 400 Ft. Servus Boots Turbojet Nozzles 1%" Hose 2%" Hose Viking Fire $234.00 $708.00 $488.00 $668.00 Equipment Minnesota Fire, 239.40 677.12' 532.00 744.00 Inc. Akins Fire 258.00 740.00 540.00 780.00 Equipment Co. Mid Central Fire 240.00 Total $2098.00 2192.52 2318.00 720.00 540.00 740.00 2140.00 * Bid for Elkart nozzle; not Akron as specified. It is recommended the bid of Viking Fire Equipment be accepted. ~-/ L~onard L. Kopp ' ! / ! '3NI 'SBiiNOLLV.LS NldgNNiiH O0 ,..'. z- ,'4:, ~unowv a-~/ ,/o .: s !~u'9 ~, ' e~o plonb se~Hd ['" U 'r. '-t- t.' , sm'mi ' -'ON uo!ld!~seC] ~:% qi' u 'L,.i- ¢' a X~!~uon~ X~!nbu! ~noX 'S~OllOJ so m, onb o~, pesoald e~o eM L tuo~ NOi. p. onO MINNESOTA FIRE INC. 2476 University Ave. ST. PAUL, MINN. 55114- Phone 646-1374 ARCHITECT I DATE OF PLANS We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: PHONE JOB NAME JOB LOCATION PHONE hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: Payment to be made as follows: , - , dollars ($., All material is guaranteed to be as specified, All work to be completed in a workmanlike //~ / // manneraccord,ng,os,,ndard pract'ces. Any,,tera,ionordeviation,rom abovespec,,,ca- ~Z~-'~ ~ f~ tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders and will becom .'~.n,,.,?.~u~.~l~ L.t _, _ /1 ~,.,.. ,/~ extra charge over end above the estimate. All agreements contingent u;on strik .... cciden~s"'~'-'T ~' .. . ,1 / / / r n Note This ro osal ma be or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and othe ecessary insurance. I Pi( : p p y ! / \ Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insura .... ~awn by us if not accepted within .I ' t~ T days, A ceptanre of ropo al --The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Signature Signature NO. Quo edon To AKINS FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 1201 OLD HIGHWAY 8 NEW BRIGHTON, MINN. 5§112 PHONE 612-636-8398 Fire Department P. O. Box 37 Mound, ~,M. 55364 l'Oate i December 13~ 1977 Delivery o,. ~ ~ ._ Receipt }Terms ( F.O,B. iToBeShippedVia iSalesman FOLLOW UP DATE In response to your inquiry, we submit the following Quotation. Stock Number/Description Quantity 400' i ~-" Bi-Lateral fire hose~ cotton-poly~ 800~ test~ i guarantee. 400' /"" ±~ Akron 77T fire hose, cotton-poly, 60C~ test 2½" Bi-Lateral fire hose 2½" Akron 77T fire hose 11I'' Akron Turbojet nozzles, ~1715 2 Servus rubber boots 20 year Price Per 2! 10 ft. 400 ' 4oo, F ~4 ~/ 6 pr. Amount oiool 1,120 i 00; Other Information Total Above mentioned prices good for 30 days. P/ease refer to the above O~o?t;'on Number when placing your order, WilsonJones 29 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 6, 1977 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 78-10 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council The City Manager Delinquent Water Bills Attached is a list of past due water and sewer accounts. These accounts are over six months past due and should be turned off for non-payment. In order to turn off the water, the Council should hold a public hearing. A suggested date for the public hearing would be February 7 or February 14. 6 MONTH ACCOUNTS 4=175~ 10-5301 13-1708 16-1543 25-1578 28-1584 34-1742 46-1743 46-1760 52-5032 58-500O 67-2048 67-1824 73-4716 76-1772 85-5510 88-5865 211-2136 220-2155 232-2185 259-5776 259-5901 259-6056 262-3061 268-5909 280-5910 286-6037 310-3012 310-3166 311-6395 343-2631 404-5025 404-5092 439-4470 442-4541 463-4651 463-4661 463-4671 475-4720 484-4701 487-4873 500-4455 563-2913 581-2885 Dale EngsL~and Kenneth Folk Terry Recket David Stuth Gary Brown Patich Aune Clarence DeWanz John Anderson James Doherty Darwin Gunion Orlando Alvarez Robert Penney Donald Gulbrandsen Norman Hemerick Richard Williams Nancy Ptacek Wm Michel Glen Reger B. J. Clark Michael King Bill Barker Andrew Anderson Steve Cooper Roger Frank Duke Janke M. J. Simar Maynard Maltz Webb Bachelor Debbie Frederick Ronald Bastyn Steve Hesse Bonnie Strom Paul Neuschwander Ronald Heutmake~ James Christianson Barbara Bedell Paul Marchall Henry C. Lister Richard Schnabel Gordon Simon Jr. Jerry Olsen Donna Luguar Mark Krotzer Bruce Benloehr 191.46 73.56 37.28 128.73 60.55 70.78 75.14 46.68 58.80 49.54 79.04 26.94 57.29 58.01 35.68 74.54 75.28 86.53 34.74 63.23 35.68 79.05 83.57 69.63 35.68 35.68 41.61 53.50 55.26 53.52 181.23 51.08 96.88 101.32 49.73 115.62 35.68 62.10 40.24 34.08 35.73 44.00 36.51 35.68 27 581-2901 587-4951 587-4990 590-5124 599-4736 599-4781 620-3025 620-4857 641-5251 Sally Swanson Gary Schleif Mike Stelter Dale Svien Lois MartinBa Sandra Andrews Steven Beatty Vincent Forsman Stanley Moas 53.61 36.71 49.31 35.68 63.77 39.73 39.51 51.30 50.46 $3269.75 -2- LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION NOTICE and AGENDA Special Meeting, 8:00 p.m., Wednesday, J~nu~ry 11, Freshwater Biological Institute Navsmre, Minnesota DISTRICT 1978 ,?..t/? ~-\ o/ 1. Call to Order 2. Roll C~ll 3. Moratorium Extension - Review smd proposals 4. E.Q.B. Hea~ing Statement 5. Dock License Fees - ThLrd Reading 6. Other 7. Adj o~rnment LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REVISED L.M.O.D. M~TING SCHEDULE January, 1978 S atu~day 1- 7-78 Boat Storage, Mooring & Launching Committee 7:30 a.m., Ha~ts Cafe, Wayzata Wednesday 1-11-78 Special Meeting of the Board of Directors 8:00 p.m., F~eshwater Biological Institute, Navarre Saturday 1-14-78 EnvL~onmental Comm~ tree 7:30 a.m., Hamts Cafe, Wayzata Monday 1-16-78 Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata S atu~dmy 1-21-78 Executive Comm~ tree 7:30 a.m., .Ha~ts Cafe, Wayzata Wednesday 1-25-78 Begulaw Meeting of the Board of Directors 8:00 p.m., F~eshwater Biological Institute, Navarre 1-4-78 E. F. ROBB, IR. COMMISSIONER Date.: BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. 2-~OO GOVERNMENT CENTER ~, ',// ' MINNEAPOLIS, M. INNE$OTA 55487 December '30, 1977 To: Suburban Hennepin County Mayors, Legislators, and others From: Commissioner E. F. Robb, Jr. Hennepin County "space needs" is a recurrent problem which n~t only involves huge capital costs but also even larger program expenses. We seem to move from crisis to crisis. A new wrinkle has been added. The possible displacement of'an essential governmental function, Juvenile Court Facilities, for a downtown sports stadium~ Without passing on the merits of a sports stadium or its location, I believe we can and must insist that the responsible citizen and taxpayer not have to foot the bill for replacing modern, expensive and expandable juvenile court facilities dispossessed by a sports stadium. The news media seems reluctant to emphasize this connection. You, as a community leader, can help pass the word. Attached are two items Which may help. put the issue in context. The first is county resolution 77-12-1387-R (please~note substitute resolution which I had to prepare overnight). "The second is a resolution I have carefully .prepared and intend.to offer the County Board on January 3,.1978. If you have any questions, kindly let me know. 23 COUNTY ( OMMISSIONERS oli!ehnepj,p County, ....,,: ADJOURNED MEETING (Published in Finance and .Commerce, Saturday, December 24, 1977) December' 2.0, 1977 t£ RESOLUtioN No. i~. Commissioner ]partz, seconaed ~'by Commtssloner Sivanleh, o/tere8 [the following resolution: . ('. : ~' BE IT RESOLVED, ~at iCounty Administrator ~ ~ected to prepare a request for Pro~sals 'to examine ~e long.range space needs of the Juven~e and District Court and to assess ~e {ea~ibl~ of co-locating Juvenile COurt. ~uncfions wl~ ~e o~er public safety functions at the sl~ Mutual Building, and.- 3 ' BE IT FURRIER RESOLVED, ~at in the event that new Juvenile 'Court f~cilifies~are req~red, current site .sha~ be declared ~s~plus land for disposal, and' ~ B~ IT FUR~ER RESOLVED, ~at the. County Adminis~a~r he directed to notify ~e Municipal ~Building Commission .of the ~County's immediate.need fo~ four cou~ffooms on ~he eaststde o~ ~e t~rd floor of ~e Cour~ouse ~.and the space direc~y across the 'corridor from ~ose couScoUs for .DisC:ct Co~t criminal arrJign. ment purposes and tUrner,' that the Municipal Building Com.' mission be dir%cted to re.allocate occupancy charges aceor~gly, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLED, that the County Adminis~ator be ~rected to present a pro~sal to · e County Board by January 10, .1978 recommending ~e disposi~on ~of the'l~ and 1~ fl~rs Court Tower of the Hennepin County Government Center for Court purposes and also, to provid~ lea~e agreements, as appropriate, pursuant to Resolutions 77-11.1170 . and 77.8-951(R) to accommodate space requirements of ~e Juvenile Court which ex~eed, the availability of County owned property ~Commissio~r R0bb °~ered the 'tollowing rc~lution as a sub. stitute, seconded by Commissioner ~ ' BE IT RESOLVED, that C.ounty Administrator be directed[ io prepare a proposal to examine[ and analyze the long'range space} · :needs of ttennepin County for the, 'Government Center, Courthouse,t ]Carpenter and Mutual Btdlding: /site, old General Hospital block, ~MeGill Building block, and' Juvenile Detention site,' and related potential land and buildings, and ~ BEjT FURTHER RESOLVED, · 'that': in the event current Juvenile ~Detention facilities are. required ifdr a downtown 'stadium site, said isite sh'all be declared stLrplus and !appraised for replacement value, and t BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,i .that the County Administrator be. ,directed to notify the Municipall iBuilding Commission of icounty's immediate need for thei ~east side of the 3rd floor of the'. iCourthouse for District Court, criminal arraignment purposes,! land . ' ; i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,' Ithat the County -Administrator be', directed tq present a proposal to! Ithe County Board by January 10,! 1978 recommending the disposition of the 10th, llth, 19th and 21st floors and level .A of the Court ITower of the Hennepin Countyl ',Government Center to ac-. ',eommodate space requirements of, ]court related and other functions, I and ' [ BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED,i icurrent and future space ',requirements of Juvenile ".Detention~ and Court, District' Court and County Attorney shall ',have high priority' in said !proposals ........... ! 0;he"vot6~o-~"' [~-~'ubstitu{'e res' olution w'a~ as follows: Kremer' .and Robbd2yea; Spartz, Ticen, l Sivanlch,' Olkon and Derus--na~;I The substitute resolution failed.I .:-Th~'/iUestlon ivas on the adoptl6n, i f the resolution'and there wereI ve yeas, and two nays, a~ follows: · Yeas -- Spar~z, Tlcen, Slvanlch;I O!kon, Chairman Derus. Nays_--I [Krcmer,-- Robb, Jr. Reso!utloni !.adopted. ~ . , RESOLUTION HO.- Commissioner Robb.offered the following resolution' WHEREAS,,Hennepin County owns Juvenile Detention Center, Juvenile Services, and Shelter Care Home buildings and other land and improvements (hereinafter referred to as Juvenile Court Facilities, in brief, JCF) expressly included within 25 acre Industry Square site proposed by City of Minneapolis resolution for (downtown) sports stadium, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has consiStently maintained and improved JCF as necessary and prudent, including provision of space for expansion need's, and WHEREAS, various studies of the community juvenile care system by Hennepin County Court Services, Office of Planning and Development, Community Health and Welfare Council, and others, some on-going, are available, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County perceives current need fo~ expansion of facilities for functions provided at JCF which cannot prudently be provided at JCF while it remains a T~ possible si'te for sports stadium, and WHEREAS, Hehnepin County must preserve the integrity of its resources for the benefit of the whole community juvenile care system and its general taxpayers, and WHEREAS, the State Planning Agency of Minnesota'has produced a Preliminary Stadi, Environmental Impa~t Statement which does not address the concerns of Hennepin County for its JCF, and WHEREAS, Hennepin C.ounty'does not wish to impede the applicat~on'of the City of ~ Minneapolis for..sports stadium, BE IT RESOLVED,. the Hennepin County Administrator is hereby directed to notify State Planning Agency.of Minnesota, the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission, the ~-~? Mayor of Minneapolis, 'and others, he de~ms appropriate, that the £ounty of Hennepin will require and seek adequate compensation~for all temporary and permanent relocation costs it may incur as a result, directly or indirectly, of inclusion of its Juvenile Court .Facility in the Minneapolis-proposed (downtown) sports stadium. Said compensation shall/~A-1 include, but shall not be limited to, replacement costs for all land, buildings, equip-II ment and expansion space now owned by Hennepin County JCF. BE 'IT F~RTHER RESOLVED, the Hennepin County Administrator is hereby'directed to maintain separate records of temporary additional expenses incurred'for Juvenile~Court Facilities functions bY Hennepin County while the stadium location site remains indete~qlll minate but inclusive of present Juvenile Court Facilities. The question was on the adoption of the resolution and ~here were and NAYS, as follows: COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA. NAY Jeff Spartz Thomas E. Ticen Richard E. Kremer E. F. Robb, Jr. Sam S. Sivanich Nancy Olkon John E. Derus, Chairman OTHER YEAS, ATTEST: Deputy County Auditor Metropolitan Transit Commission 801 American Center Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 612/2,~-0939 December 29, 1977 Mr. Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp: In 1977, the State of Minnesota authorized a paratransit service dem- onstration grant program to plan, promote, demonstrate and evaluate the effectiveness, cost and efficiency of paratransit as a means of 1) serving areas inadequately served by regular transit, 2) improving the accessibility and productivity of regular transit, and 3) providing improved service to transit dependents. The MTC has determined that these objectives could be realized by a paratransit system serving the Lake Minnetonka Area. A preliminary application (enclosed herein) for this system was approved by the Commission at its meeting of December 21, 1977, and subsequently sub- mitted to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) for review and consideration. A copy of this proposal has als0 been sent to the members of the Community Advisory Committee of the Western Hennepin Route Ridership Improvement Project who expressed interest in being made aware of any future transit plans for the Lake Minnetonka Area. Assuming that Mn/DOT will approve the preliminary application, it is our plan to consult with your city or your representative relative to implementing this paratransit system, and therefore, would appreciate your preliminary comments regarding any aspect of this proposal. If you need any additional information, please contact Bob Pearson at 221-0939, extension 153. Sincerely, Camille Andre Chief Administrator CDA/RLP/pjk/35 Enclosure MTC Proposal ~5 December 22, 1977 PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR ................... LAKE MI~ETONKA PAPATP~SIT PUPdPOSE To demonstrate a paratransit system that would serve the Lake Minnetonka Area,_w~i~h.~op~_~r'ovi~e__!oc~!.c~r~lation n~pds an~ ~r~Tide a collection and distribution system for regular route transit, in a manner consistent with the Transportation Development Guide-Policy Plan. BACKGRO%~D During 1976, the MTC, in cooperation with }~/DCT, the Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County and the communities adjoining Lake Minnetonka, conducted a short range transit improvement study titled "Western Hennepin Route-Ridership Improvement Project." This study recommended that the MTC develop an implementation plan for paratransit services based cn the experiences of applicable co~T, unity oriented paratransit programs. The study noted that many of the roads in the L~ce Minnetonka Area are narrow, windy and hilly--,~nsuitable for usuage by regular transit buses. While the area has a propu!ation of over 88,000, it has a relatively iow population density. Because of this, it is difficult to generate the ridership needed to justify a high lew~l of regular route service. However, a paratransit system could: ~ Provide service throughout the area since the small vans could operate on all of the roads and bridges in the area. ~ Operate for less cost, ass~ing a private operator is willing to ouerate such a serv±ce. · Provide direct service between residential neigh- borhoods and local industry, schools, libraries, retail centers and recreational facilities not now served by regular transit because .of road and bridge constrictions and juristical constraints. o Serve the unmet needs of transit dependents and others de~iring an alternative to the use of autos. · Act as a circulation and distribution system for regular route transit (~C, Richfield Bus Company and Medicine Lake Lines), there by assisting in in- creasing their route productivity. e Demonstrate the feasibility of the sub-regional concept' policies of the Metropolitan Council that advocate the interface of local and regional service at subregional major activity centers. As part of the Western Hennepin Transit Study, an analysis was made of possLble revisions and L~provements in Lake Minnetonka transit service. The concept envised to best serve Lake Minnetonka needs consisted of an eighteen van paratransit system that would tie all neig.hborhoods with both local and adjoining activity centers including Ridgedaie. This concept envisee ~e-~'~na~io'n of 6fl-peak MTC 'service thus requ~ing passengers (desiring to travel to Minneapolis et al) to transfer at ei~her Wayzata (proposed te~mination of MTC off-peak service) or P~dgedale. Express and peak-hour local service would, however, continue tc operate to and from ~,!c~d so as to provide existing ccm~uters with direct = ~ ' = _ _e.~lc~ to Minneauciis, et al. -3- A demonstration of this scope would require more planning and elapsed. time than affordable by a demonstration. In addition, the removal of off- pe~k local regular transit service would generate considerable concern prior to the determination of whether or not existing patrons would accept the transfer proposition. Accordingly, it seems advisable to limit the pr~- posed d~monstration to five operational vans, the same as that of the White Bear Lake Community Centered Transit Demonstration; this also has the advantage of providing comparative data between communities With different characteristics. This five van demonstration will not include the deletion of the off-peak local regular route transit service. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Lake Minnetonka Paratransi~ Project include: 1. Improving accessability to regular route transit. 2. Determining if transit dependents and others who are inadequately served by regular route transit will utilize paratransit. 3.Determine if auto drivers and passengers can be diverted to paratransit. 4. Assist in determining an effective manner of providing para- transit. 5. Assist in determining the feasibility of implemen%ing the sub- regional concept policies of the Metropolitan Council. 6. Determine whether cr not and the extent to which ~he consumer is willing to pay a premium for off-route pickup and delivery. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Five vans (plus a spare) would provide paratransit service through- out the Lake Minnetonka Area and to and from the Ridgedale Shopping Center.. In addition to providing local circulation needs, these vans would interface with MTC service at Wayzata and Ridgedale and with MTC, Medicine Lake Lines ~nd the Richfield Bus Company services at appropriate locations and ~L~es. It is proposed that this be a point deviation system wkere patrons would pay 30¢ between any point on the 'route with no charge for transfers to another paratransit route. A pre=~ium of 20¢ would be charged for each deviation, either pickup or delivpry. Therefore, a total of 70¢ would be charged for those persons desiring point to point service when such points are not part of the basic route. It is further proposed that no transfer privileges be given to those persons transferring to or from regular route transit in that regular route transit will still service the area. Accordingly, a person using regular route service between Mound and Minneapolis would pay 60¢, whereas a Mound resident not living near a regular transit route but near a paratransit route could use a combination cf services for 70¢. The additional 10G represents a small price to pay for the increased mobility that would be provided for' the Lake Minnetonka .Area. During the off-peak, senior citizens would be charged the regular paratransit fare but no fare on MTC service, permitting them to travel from Mound (as an example) to Minneapolis for 30¢ if they choose not to afford themselves of the special pickup or de!ive~? service. -5- PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE Preliminary Application Final Application Planning Operator Selection Marketing Demonstration Evaluation PUBLIC TP~A.NSIT SCHEDULE 1978 1979 1980 In that this paratransit proposal is intended to complement the existing regular route transit system, no changes are anticipated in the service levels and hours of operation of the regular transit service during tke demonstration. It is, however, assumed that recommendations for regular route' service level changes would result as part of the demonstration's evaluation. COMPATIBILITY In that these vans can operate cn any of the roads in the Minnetonka Area, the routes will be designed ~o serve areas not.now being se~¢ed by regular transit; such that this paratransit service should complement regular transit as well as providing a collection and distribution service for regular transit. CONTIA~ATION POTENTIAL The proposed paratransit fare structure cannot offset the estimated operating costs so that a continuing subsidy would be necessary. Near the completion of the demonstration, an evaluation will ke made to: 1. Dete_~nine whether or not subse~aent subsidies justify the social ~enefits afforded by the para~ransit system. 2. Determine whether or not regular transit patronage has or will increase because cf %hi~ paratransit service. -6- 3. Determine the advisability of discontinuing local regular route service that does not meet the performance funding requirements. Until such an evaluation has been ccmpleted and agreed upon, it would not be prudent to suggest that this project should be continued. PROPOSED BUDGET See AppendiX A for budget assu~.ptions and rational. Fixed Costs (6 vans) Operating Costs Labor (drivers) Operator Administration MTC $ 59,760 25,65Q 106,875 89,342 50,000 Subtotal $331,627 Revenue ($ 74,750) Net Demonstration Losts $25.6,877 It is proposed that M~/DOT provide 100% of the net costs. Because of the experimental nature of this proposai, estL~ated costs may vary. However, suitable a~jus~ents can be made to preculde budget overexpendures. APPLICANT The applicant is the MTC. The personnel assigned to this project will be experienced in transit plar_ning and operations. Applicable experience includes: Community Centered Transit To~al Com~uter Service Project Mobility Route-Riderskip ~rojects Provision of sus~sidies and assistance to lccal paratransit operations and prcpcsa!s. -7- MARKET The demonstration is proposed to be conducted in the Lake Minnetonka A~ea and the adjoining Ridgedale Shopping Center. Average patraonage * has been estimated at: 650 riders per weekday 560 riders per Saturday 3810 riders per week *See Appendix A, Note 7, for background. 13¸ BUDGET NOTES APPENDIX A Normally, a vehicle lease would cost about $195 per month based on a four-year lease where the vehicle would be used 15,000 to 20,000 miles per year. This proposal would require about 40,000 miles per year such that cost would have to be amortized over a two year period, which suggests a lease rate of about $350 per month. On this basis, the f~ed costs per vehicle per month is estimated to be: Vehicle Lease $350 Insurance 50 License 5 Garaging 10 Total Fixed Costs/Month $415 6 Vans for ~do Years 2. The proposed daily hours of operation are: $59,760 e 5 Vans (6~9AM ~ 3-6PM) 3 Vans (9AM-3PM) 2 Vans (6PM-11PM) Daily 30 hours 18 hours 10 hours 58 hours The proposed Saturday operation is: 5 Vans (8:30AM-6:30PM) ~ 50 hours Annual hours are therefore: 250 days @ 58 hours 52 Saturdays @ 50 hours Annual 14,500 2,600' 17,100 hours Vans are expected to average 15mph in the Lake Minnetonka Area becuase of pick-up and drop-off services. 17,100 hours at 15 mph produces 256,500 miles during the two year demonstration period. The operating cost has been estimated at 10¢ per mile; this includes gasoline, oil and lube, tires and maintenance.. Therefore, vehicle operating costs for the one year period would be $25,650. It is assumed that operatcrs w~i! c0-~'-$-5~® 'per :gout-Plus 25% - --~-r-'$ 6.25 pe~- ~0ur. At 17,100 hours (during the demonstration period), labor would ccst $i~6,875.' 12 -2- o Other operator costs include administration, dispatching, profit a~d miscellaneous costs. These are est'-mated as follows: Administratien $15,000 '-' ~0,000 Dispatching ~.. ~_ Miscellaneous 5,000 Subtotal ~80,000 Profit based on 5% of labor ($106,875). and above ($80,000~ Total 9,342 .89,342 MTC: Planning, CoOrdination, Administration and Comraunity Involvement, 1st year - 26 wks. @ $22.25/hr. Marketing Evaluation Total $25,000 20,000 5,0OO $50,000 ' At the end of eight months, the White Bear Lake Community Centered Transit Demonstration had achieved 0.5 passengers per ~=~_~. An analysis of this trend indicates that it could reach 1 passenge~ ...... per mile within another 12 to 16 months. The Lake Minneto~ka Area has about twice the population of White Bea~ Lake; in addition, the Minnetonka Area has more industry, shopping and service facilities, etc., which suggest more intr~travel - that could be provided by paratransit. It is assumed that 1.5 passenger per mile could be achieved within two years or an average of 0.75 passengers per mile over the two year period. ~56,500' miles at 0.75 passenger per mile average produces 192,500 passengers t92,500 @ 30¢ 50,000_~rop~0f~s @ 2.0~._ _ 30,000pick-ups @ 20¢ Project Revenue $~7,750 10,000 7,000 $ 74,750 8. Note ~1 above assumes vehicle leasing as experience.~ leasing' requires less vehicle acquisition time than vehicle pro- curement, an importan~ ccnsidersation to the ~ely initiation of the demonstration. It should be no~ed, however, that some of these vans may be available from the White Bear Lake Corm'unity Centered Transit Demons'~ration, in which case the fixed costs could be reduced by $16,000 to $24,000. In that this possibility will require investigation and suitable arrangements, ~his pcssibi!ity has not been taken into account in preparing the budget for this preliminary application. 9. It is to be noted ~hat ~he vans were leased for two years; ~kus aP, abort cost is not necessa~i should ~ue service be disconti~.ued at ~he end of demonstration. Should this happen, the vehicles would be available for sale (reimbursement to Mn/DOT or some other paratransit project. 300 Metro Square Buildir~g, 7tla Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612. 291-6359 ]'anuary 3, 1978 Minnesota Depa~ment of Natural Resources Application for I~A~ArCON fu,~.ds Acquisition of ten public access sites Received on December 12, !977 ~4.et, op~k~on Council Referral File No. 5337 NOTICE OF REVIEW L'~.NV CO N The Ivletropo!itan Council has received an application for federal funds to accomplish the above referenced project. The federal procedures for review cf ~nese applications require that any potentially affected units of government, nelgkac.~hcod orgonizations, groups, and human rights commissions be notified of the project and given an opportunity to comment. The interest of your com- munity or group sncu!~ be expressed by means of a letter describing ~h_ effect the project might have on .your community or the type of additional information you Wcu:-d like to receive. n.~,.lc~ lnt.~.~st, if an},,' it !$ l~C'dl'P. De~u ~00[1 ~'~, Aletrocolltan. ..... ~' ~. , ..... ~, C~m,c.~ to arrange a conference .v_t.. the applicant zor the benen~ of all interested par[ies. if you desire to review the application, copies are on n,~ at the Metropolitan Council and in the offices of the applicant. i0 An Agency Croat~;d to Coordinate tho Flan,~ing and Devclopn]e~t of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Con, prising: Anoka Countv 3 Carver County O D~d~ota Cou~ty o tIonn~pin County 0 lq,'~msey Coun{y O ~cott County O Washington County january 3, 1978 · Page-Two The following municipalities and special districts have been notified of this proposal: City of East Bethel City of Chanhassen City of ~ffaconia %Ara conia Township Linwood Township Laketown Township Spring Lake Township S a nd. Creek Township May Township City of New Scandia City of Prior Lake Forest Lake Township City of Forest Lake City of Shoreview City of Plymouth City of Shorewood City of Minnetrista /~C]~ty of Mound of Maple Grove County of Anoka County of Carver County of Hennepin County of Ramsey County of Scott County of ~;ashingtcn Elm Creek Protection and Menagement Commission Minnehaha Creek %Aratershed District Rice Creek %/Vatershed District Shingle Creek Watershed District Riley-Purgator7 Creek ~;Vatershed Dist.:-ict Hennepin County Park Reser~/e Distr,_ct Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ~R/pb Sincere iy, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Referral Coordinator 9 St,t:uc [ l"ro, icct l!u.nl~c r l'.)'¢).i~:cJ: T:i t:l,: ]'l:O,jC:Ct P¢:;C.[o~'l l)nLc~ of approv;t], chroul;h 12-31.-80 Project St:el,,; (1)c:;cri. i',t. ion of' Pro/jeer) '£hc: State of Hinnesot:a will acquire ten public access site:.; on tim following Anoka Counl:y: 27 -003-0000. Cayvo r (;out'tl;y: 27 -019-0000 lk:nnepin CourtLy: 27 -0 53-0;300 Linwuod, Deer and Rice Lot:us & Waconia HinrteConka, Christma.~, D0.ccl,, Fish & Bass R;,mr.e y CourtLy : 27-123-0000 Tutti e Scot. t: C,r),:nLy 2'/-139-0U00 Prior a~'~d SLttt'.on l..~n si-tin glo n Count:),: 27-1 Bill Ha'cine, Clear, l:or,:::;t, l,ak(: SI;. Croix and Bone P:-oLjc. ct Stage (:ov~:r,'d l,y lhi.q Agro:2;i:":ltk l.;ntire Proj¢:c l: : .. ,. ,'.',-;I l')7,iJ 5U /,,, :1; 37.~ (')()(). O0 ','...375,D00.o.00 ....... 'J'hC: folluwing al'ta,:lu:::.;,l's ::re ]te.ceby :i.r~cor'lmral c:d i.n'o, tlii.~: ,tg,. ..... C~:h::..n"u: 2. ]'-':o.j;.:ct l',',,i} ):-;;t'l. v 1,W27-00790 8 WATERSHED DiISTR iCT P 0 Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 David H. Cochran, Pres. H. Dale Palmatier Albert L. Lehman * James S. Russell · Jean Williams DAT~..: December 22, 1977 RE: Amended Preliminary Engineering Report/ Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project ~ I am forwardina for your review and comment the amended preliminary engineering report on the Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project. This repor~ was accepted by the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on December 15, 1977, with direction to transmit it to the petitioning municipalities and all other interested persons at this time. Pursuant to statute, this report is also being trans- mitted to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Minnesota Water Resources Board for reports by those agencies. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the 'Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will hold a joint public hearing on the creek improvement projects on February 8, 1978. As soon as the time of the hearing has been set by the State Office of Hearing Examiners we will notify you. Should you have questions or comments regarding the enclosed report, please contact the district's engineer, Eugene A. Hickok & Associates, 545 Indian Mound Road, Wayzata, Minnesota, 55391, telephone - (612) 473-4224. 7 DISTRIBUTION: Petitioning Municipalities: Minneapolis st. Louis Park Minnetonka Edina Hopkins Minneapolis Park & Recreation Bd. Cities of: Deephaven Golden Valley Independence Maple Plain Minnetonka Beach Mound Plymouth St. Bonifacius Spring Park Wayzata Excelsior Greenwood Long Lake Medina Minnetrista Orono Richfield Shorewood Tonka Bay Woodland Chanhas sen Township Laketown Township Waconia Township Watertown Township Hennepin County Board of Commissioners Carver County Board of Commissioners All State Legislators within District Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Lake Minnetonka Association Creekside Chapter, I.W.L.A. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Advisory Committee Former Managers, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District i/ ~ o i I/.3 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota Pa§el Month of Monthly Activity Report of Water Department ............. This '"L~s~ .... This ¥~ar Last Yea Work Units ........... l%nth Month ,,t,.o, d?,,te,, to date Water Consumed -- Hydrants. Painted - ~an Ho~s No. Times Checked Pump ~2 No. Times Checked ~mp '~3 3 ~No. Times Checked Pump ~ ~Cu~b Stops Replaced ~gcstin~ Curb Boxes, r Man ~ours ,,,¢ [S~rvice Connect,~ons Installed Mound~ Minnesota Monthly Activity Report of Water Department Work 'Jnits Month I Month el Tm'n Ohs l';on--Payment eP 0 , 2. 3 ' ~L 7 Zate- Se~.p!es - San Hours .q /.~ _ _ . 2 CI?Y OF MO~O MOUND ~, ~NNF~OTA SALES MONTtiLY hCTIVITY REPORT OF LIQUOR DEPAR~NT MObT~D OFF SAil,i: G,:zmpo~ !so,, of ~.,e~t:n.l..y Mon'hh 8700 west 36th street west 201~"~ November 9, 1977 st. louis park, minnesota 55426 Ur. Tim Lovaasen, Mayor telephone 933-2445 City of Hound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN 55365 Dear Mr. Lovaasen: The following is a brief statistical report of public health nursing services to resdients of Mound during the period of July 1 thru September 30, 1977. Additional copies of this report are included for Council members. feel free to call if you have any questions. July 1 case load admissions closures September 30 case load Accumulative Case Load Home Visits nursing care teaching-counseling home health aide care Total Not home/not found No. immunizations given HWB/sh cc: Leonard Kopp, City Manager Barbara Heyman, Clerk Please 1977 1976 ~' 'f6" 55 36 40 68 36 22 76 90 146 301 185 88 127 122 458 511 12 32 66 38 Sincerely, ~e Hilda W. Boyle, Director Kenneth Romness)M Health Officers Char!es Cst!sen) .D., supported by tax funds fgm municipalities of suburban henneoin county & the united way ~sive land use and attached uilding heights, ~m stated at ption of such an council's No. 1 ; said that after eli a resolution Iso said he felt ~'d in residential tm and that he'd way wanting to I areas." ¥idmer asked, . everything we Yes, I don't see nt disagreed. He changes will be made as much as wordage of the ordinance itself in places, seems to be, in the words council. "pretty bad." H0rvever. as Hunt said, "That is something we don't know yet." City Administrator Pat Osmonson did inform them that the interim ordinance would need all of their votes. Council- woman Ellie Heller was absent and excused. , Councihnen Don Dill and Carl Widmer stressed it should be as short-term as possible. Rockvam and Hunt were in full' agreement. Working meetings will be set up as quickly as possible to complete 35. The vote was called for and all four cast aye votes. The interim ordinance will be in force until. Ordinauce 35 is completed. It becomes effective today with publicat~ion in The Laker. h cannot exceed one year. Orono folks ibeach closed i['acteristics of the no. The city is ,&ars is a long list ~i'¢i.~ions on the ghting losing its ~rnmental units. feature that of the meetings neighborhood [~ squabbles again week. For the people of Sandy ~ach other. ~e feeding of the lqoward White. ag on one side of 'd Olivers, living th two couples of ng behind the lithe city for the ttorney for the ir claims to the .were these: .The . It was crowded ?0.foot frontage. ~ unsupervised. g free. Vehicles Ftthe beach was ~*-night used. Noise kept neighbors awake at night.' There was also a problem with litter, broken glass, tampered-with mail boxes and parked cars blocking access which might be needed by emergency vehicles. Hartman went on to say that the city was maintaining a public nuisance at the beach. He intimated that the city was in violation of its own public nuisance ordinance. The city, he said, "should clean up its act." Hartman requested that the city close the beach. Following Hartman's arguments, a number of area residents rose to say that they had seen very few of the problems alleged toby the petitioners. They also said that they used the Sandy Beach recrea- tional area as a neighborhood beach and were as against closing it as the petitioners were for closing it. Some did, however, mention the problems of dogs running free and of vehicles driving onto the beach. Others suggested the beach be kept open, but that restrictions be more strictly enforced. This was the tack the city council took. After suggestions by Mayor Van Nest and CP Paurus about neighborhoods working in harmony rather than squabbling, the council moved to deny the petition. However, restrictions will be tightened and Reportgi s debt data on state cities The 19 residents of Funkley, Mn.. the smallest city in the state--spent $47 apiece for city services last year, while those living, in Minneapolis spent $379 per capita, according to a report released last week by State Auditor Robert Mattson. Minneapolitans threw in another $I 15 each for capital outlay. Funkleyites had no capital expenditures. Mound. according to the report, .had a year-end ~er capita indebtedness of $485.11. Ex >crises for the year amounted to $144.63 per Moundite. The capital outlay total '~as $47.35 per capita. Mound, ~with a population,967, ranks 66th in population .mong state cities. Orono, ~anking 80th with a population of 7,235, h~d a per capita indebtedness of $558__~.~67 ar expenditure total of ~ per person ~nd a capital outlay of ~ Minnetrlsta, the report showed, ranked 131st in pgpulation. Its 3,$80 residents each owed $1,126 at the end of 1976. Per capita exp~es for the year were $13.~, auld the'capital outlay figure was $2.22. ' There ale 229 cities in Minnesota with population~ greater than Spring Park's 1,603. Percapita indebtedness in Spring Park in 19~6 was $280.72, while expenses for the yea~ came ou-[~c~$~1_2.~.~3~2 per person and the capital outlay figure was $21.90._~ Mattson's annual report on per capita receipts, disbursements and indebtedness of Minnesota's cities covers calendar year 1976. Of Minnesota's 168 cities with popula- tions of more than 2,500, 22 had year end per capita debt of at least $1,000. Only six of the cities with at least 2,500 population had no per capita indebtedness. The largest cit, y with no debt was Ramsey, population 7,620. '. Of the 10 largest .cities~Minneapolis, St. Paul, Duluth, Bloomington, Rochester, Edina, St. Louis Park, Richfield, St. Cloud and Minnetonka--only one, Minnetonka,' had per capita debt of more than $1,000. The figure for Minnetonka was $2,177.. Per capita debt in Minneapolis was $475, St. Paul $489 and Duluth $256. The report showed 30 Minnesota cities beer 'and enforced more closely in the future. It was with populations of at least 20,000 with five l}agers. This often also agreed to review the use of the beach, I?~, in trespass and ,allother public beaches, following next ' having more than 50,000. try was loudly year s swimming season.. lPh e By Jim Whiteseli Last week's Mound was full of surprises. It onl Everyone was in a good m, attorney had some stu seemed Continental Tel~ cided to compromise. Preceding the council councils of Maple Plain met in a special session to with the city attorney. Continental had offer rates if Mound and Maph their court actions and apl: Ill j! AND A MERRY CHRIS'[ POLICE/~RIME ACTIVITY REPORT CITY OF ,~ouNo I.~ONTH Nov. YEAR 1977 226 3 1 1 '2 Jure_nile felony ¢ misdemeanor aJv~e~s Other eaL~s i~or TOTAL 8 16 48 · 62 262 648 t. -FROPERTY LOSSIRECbVERV' SUMMARY TOTAL lagL eZZi~ eombine~} 0 370 420 !,975 75 ~,165 5,005 13,384 1,500 50o 5'40 POLICE/~RI,QE ACTIVITY REPORT fifTY OF >iou~,') AIOffFH oct. FEAR 1977 158 7~ 4 0 8 I'Z: ' '. -?P. OPERTY LOSS/RECbVERY' SUMMARY TOTAL O~,~ TOTAL [a~Z e/2ie~ combine, d) Stole~ 250 o o 30 o 0 300 2,113 o ..... 1~803 ~ 4,496 21,562 2OQ. ' 1,500 ~ _ . _ . 39 . ._~_ 1,739. pART I CRIMES , , ~ ~ <o ~ A~ g~g~ 5 5 " TOTAL 27 PART II CRIM~ Va~m S~ G~g Offe~ ag~t D~vl~ und~ ~ infO.ce 6 6 5 1 ~.or L~ 3 ~ 7 Public Peace TO'FA L PART I CRIME RATE PART II C~I~F ~)aTF ON LAKE MINNETONKA INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDg 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA55364 December 19, 1977 (6~2)472-~1ss Hr. Arno Windsor, Vice Pres. Twin City Federal Savings & Loan 801Harquette Ave. Mpls. Mn. 55402 Mr. Windsor: Reference Lots 2, 18 & 19 Block 7, Pembroke Thank you for your cooperation in giving the City an easement for Tuxedo Boulevard over the subject lots. With regard to these lots being a building site, I find: 1. The area is zoned A-I, single family residential, which requires 10,000 square feet of ground. According to my calculations, Lot 1 has 4,152 sq. ft. Lot 18 & 19 has 7,413 sq. ft. Total 11,965 sq. ft Less land for easement 900 Balance 11,065 sq. ft. According to the above, you have enough land for a building site after the easement, with some to spare. Because of the topography, it is poss- ible you might need a front yard variance at the time a house is built on this property but until we have plans, we cannot ask the Council for a variance. You also discussed the possibility of sellingkLot 1, a portion of Lot 2 so the house on Lot 1 would have an adequate §etback. Such a division of property would need approval of the Planning Commission and the City Council. Mr. Arno Windsor, Vice Pres. T.C.F. 801 Marquette Ave. I. trust this answers any questions you have concerning these lots. you have further questions, please call. Respectful ly, LLK/dd cc: C. Pearson ~// City Council (6) Ray Klanderud If ON LAKE MINNETONKA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 Oecember 13, 1977 TELEPHONE ' (612) 472-1155.. ''~: A[~'I TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard L. Kopp, City Man~e~ Don Levens, City Planner Housing Assistance Progra~iU(Subsidy) Under the federal '~Section 8" Rent Assistance, the program provides a rent subsidy for low and moderate income families in existing, privately owned, market rate rental units. The rent subsidy's paid directly to the owner of the rental property by the Metro H.R.A. HOW DOES THE PROGRAM WORK? 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. An eligible tenant selects a rental unit. The tenant and the owner inspect the unit. The tenant and the owner discuss terms of the lease. The City inspects the unit. If the unit is satisfactory and within rent limits, the H.R.A. approves the lease. The H.R.A. and owner sign a contract for H.R.A. rent payments. The tenant moves into the unit. The tenant pays twenty-five per cent (25%) of the income toward rent. The H.R.A. pays the balance of the rent monthly to the owner. The types of rental housing that qualify are privately owned apartment units, duplexes, townhouses, single family homes, cooperatives, congregate housing and mobile homes, provided that they are within the rental limits and appropriate size for the family. The maximum rents allowed for the H.A.P. as of September 2, 1977 are: Family Size & Size of Rental Unit Maximum Rent One Bedroom $202.00 Two Bedrooms 5251.O0 Three Bedrooms $292.00 Four Bedrooms or larger $330.00 The maximum rents are to include all utilities except telephone. Maximum income 1 $9,600.00 * 2 $11,000.O0 3 $12,400.00 4 $13,800.00 5 $14,700.00 6 $15,500.00 7 $16,400.O0 over 7 $17,300.00 * Elderly, handicapped, displaced or disabled only. A family does not have to move to be eligible for rent assistance. If a family is currently renting a unit within the maximum rent limits in one of the par- ticipating communities, and is paying more than twenty-five per cent (25%) of its income for rent, the family may be able to remain in the same unit paying a lower rent while the H.R.A. pays the difference. Since February, 1976 to September, 1977 they'has been two rent reviews for the one bedroom limitation: $176.00 - February 1976 - June 1977 $186.00 - June 1977 - September 1977 $202.00 - September 1977 - to present In addition, the maximum income has been modified from $5,000.00 in 1976 to $9,600.00 in 1977. The progress of the rental subsidy program in Mound since early 1976 is indicated below: Phase I August 30, 1976 to February 29, 1977 44 applicants 13 certified Phase II June 28, 1977 to present 19 applicants 3 certified Other 5 certified elsewhere Tota 1 .21 certified Mound The program throughout the Metro area has received tremendous response. Since May of 1977, 1,O80 units were approved for the program but over 3,000 applications have been received. Therefore, the Metro H.R.A. recommends housing assistance be temporarily suspended as of January 1978 until additional units are added and approved for the program. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 MEMORANDUM December 8, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Metro HRA Advisory Committee Phil Katzung, HRA Program Manager Temporary Suspension of Taking Applications for the Section 8 Existing Housing Program As you will recall, a temporary suspension of taking applications was instituted on February 1, 1977 because of the large waiting list at that time. An additional 1,080 units were approved for the program in May 1977 and the application process was resumed on June 27, 1977. Since June 27, 1977, over 3,0-00 applications have been taken. The Section 8 Regulations provide for suspending taking applica- tions as follows: .. "882.207(c) Suspension of Taking of Applications. If the number of Families on the PHA's waiting list for Certificates of Family Participation is such that there is no reasonable prospect that additional applicants could be issued Certifi- cates within-the next year, the PHA may determine to suspend the taking of further applications. Any such determination CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 21, 1977 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Park Commission City Manager Open Space Requirement PUD's Attached is a copy of a report showing what other municipalities request in open space or money in lieu of open space. Leo'nard k. Kopp LLK/dd cc: Planning Comm. City Council ON LAKE: MINN~rONKA INDIAN BURIAl. MOUNDB 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA55364 December 15, 1977 (6~2) 472-~ TO: FROH: SUBJECT: City Manager, Leonard L, K,~,op~ Don Levens, City Planner Survey of Public Open Space Provision for Planned Urban Residential Development Since the City of Mound is considering the adoption of an ordinance for a Planned Unit Residential Development, the staff surveyed local commun- ities which have a similar ordinance. Eden Prairie Reasonable portion of each subdivision or single family - $275. Other residential User - $200 Minnetonka Provision not enforced Plymouth Residential $150 per unit Shorewood Residential $250 per unit Minnetrista The greater of: (1) Proposed Dwelling Units per Acre, or (2) The Zoned Density Percentage of Land or Market Value to be Dedicated MA....$ LO N KAPLANM iNNEDELMANE A~-PT^L~ o~,'°°° ,..,, ~,w,.: ~.,-7 j, ,N..__ N/.~E.,S, F~ O R IVlAN ,.,...,, z ~, _o7~. 5 s ~, o aBRAND '~. McNULTY December 19, 1977 77-528 Mr. Russell Doty, Hearing Examiner State of Minnesota Office of Hearing Examiners Room 300 - 1745 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 Re: In the Matters of the Complaints of Mound, Minnesota, and Maple Plain, Minnesota, and Continental Telephone' Subscribers Residing Therein Against 'Continental Telephone Company Regarding Reasonableness of Rates. Docket Nos. PSC-78-034-RLD and PSC-78-035-RLD. Dear Mr. poty: We are writing to advise you that Curtis A. Pearson, counsel for the City of Mound, and Richard J. Schieffer, counsel for the City of Maple Plain, on behalf of those · respective cities,.have agreed with the undersigned, counsel for Continental Telephone Company of Minnesota, Inc., to an indefinite continuance of the above entitled matter. The. agreed upon indefinite continuance obviates the need for the prehearing conference previously scheduled for Wednesday, December 21, 1977. The matter has been continued in vie~ of the express intention of Continental Telephone to file with the Public Service Commission a Petition for statewide realignment of rates within the next sixty days. Such filing may resolve certain of the issues in the above matter. In addition to the above listed counsel, our office has orally advised counsel for the Public Service Commission and staff of the foregoing. Mr. Russell Doty, Hearing Examiner Decembe. r 19, 1977 Page Two JCM:pt CC: We thank you ~for your cooperation in this matter. V~e~y truly yours, Bernard Singer Leo J. Ambrose Jerome L. Getz Curtis A. Pearson Richard J. Schieffer aseociation of metropolitan municrpalitiee BULLETIN TO: MEMBER MUNICIPALITIES (Chief Administrative Official and Designated Delegate). 'D'A'TE : December 21, 1977 RE: Membership meeting on January 5, 1978 .... Proposed Bg-Law Amendments In addition to consideration of the proposed new Legislative Poli- cy, as noted in the original membership meeting notice dated Decem- ber 7, 1977, two proposed By-Law Amendments will also be considered. The By-Laws Committee met on December 19, 1977 and adopted the en- closed By-Law amendments for consideration at the membership meet- ing. In accordance with Article XII of the AMM By-Laws,..."the By-Laws may be amended, repealed or altered, in whole or in part, at an annual, regular or special meeting by a two thirds vote of all municipalities voting, providing that the amendments have been mailed out to members at least seven days prior to the meeting"... .... Additional Policy on Land Use: Also enclosed is one additional proposed legislative policy to be considered on January 5th. This proposed policy deals with agri- cultural land use and has not as yet received Board approval and, therefore, is subject to change~ The Board will consider this policy prior to the membership meeting. REMINDER! ]ENERAL MEMBERSHIP LEGISLATIVE POLICY MEETING THURSDAY, JANUARY 5~ 1978 8:00 P~M. ST~ LOUIS PARK RECREATION CENTER NOTE: We request that the administrative official receiving this mater- ial make distribution to the appropriate city officials. 300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222-2861 Bulletin...Re Jan · 1978 membership meetin Enclosure 1 .... Proposed Amendments to AMM By-Laws~ ARTICLE VII OFFICERS SECTION 3. ELIGIBILITY. TO be eligible to be elected and to serve or to continue to serve as an elective officer of the Association· a person shall be an of- ficer of a member municipality° Any vacancy in an elective office shall be filled for the remainder of the term by the Board of Direc- tors, except that a vacancy in the office of President shall be filled for the remainder of the term by the succession of the Vice President, and a vacancy in the office of Director occurring at the annual meeting shall be filled by election at the annual meeting for the remainder of the term. The provisions of this section shall not apply to the office of the immediate past president. Any member of the Board of Directors who is absent for three con- secutive meetings or who is absent for any four regular meetings in any one membership year ~h~-be-deemed-eo-h~ve-~es~g~ed-~om Be-~e6-Bg-~s~ehe~-e6F~e~a~-~-ehe-s~me-~eg= is found to be non- $,articipat,~n~ as a Board member and the Executive Director shall forwar~.,~,. ~.e~ter tR, ~,he m, emb~rs of that officer's,, ci,~ council so informin~ them of that Board members poor attendance record. ARTICLE VIII BOARD OF DIRECTORS SECTION 3. A quorum of the Board shall be e~ghe nih,~ ~e~e~s Officer~ ~e ~e~g-ehe-P~es~eneT-¥~e-B~es~e~e-~-P~se-P~es~e~e~7 and action by it shall require the favorable vote of a majority but not less than seven members. NOTE: Crossed out wording (e~ghe) is that language being deleted and underlined wording (ni~,e) is new language being added. Exist- ing wording to be retained is typed as is. -1- 13 ? Enclosure 2, continued.~...~ 30 SPECIFICALLY CONCERNING THE METROPOLITAN AREA AND LAND USE LEGIS- LATION FOR THE METROPOLITAN AREA, THE FOLLOWING SUGGESTED FACTORS SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT: a~ RURAL AREA AS DEFINED BY THE METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS---CONTROLS SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE THE PRESERVATION OF THIS LAND FOR AGRICULTURAL USE. URBAN SERVICE AREA AS DEFINED BY THE METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK AND LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS---CONTROLS SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE ORDERLY TRANSITION FROM AGRICULTURE TO UR- BAN USE. THESE CONTROLS SHOULD INCLUDE CITY DETERMINATION OF TERMINATION TIME~ ASSESSMENTS DUE UPON TERMINATION, SPECI- FIC QUALIFYING AGRICULTURAL USES SHOULD BE DEFINED, LAND SHALL BE ASSESSED FOR TAX PURPOSES AT ITS HIGHEST AND BEST USE AFTER TERMINATION, SPECIFIED LENGTH OF TIME EXTENDABLE AT CITY OPTION, AND OWNER OPERATOR ONLY MAY QUALIFY~ NO PENALTY SHOULD BE PROVIDED UPON TERMINATION OF GREEN ACRES STATUS UNLESS THE LAND OWNER PREMATURELY TERMINATES THE GREEN ACRES CONTRACT. PENALTIES OF THIS TYPE NEED NOT BE LEGISLATED BUT COULD BE NEGOTIATED WITHIN INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTS. -3- H NNF_.PIN COUNTY ALdOHOL SAFETY ACTION PROJECT 625 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 612 338-4756 To Anybody Interested - "TAKE THE DRUNKEN DRIVER OFF THE PROPERTY TAXPAYER'S BACK." That's what a bill in the current Minnesota Legislature would do. It's HF 1381 - S¥ 865 and the enclosed summary will tell you what it's all about. It breaks new ground in controlling drunken driving. (See attached article from the Editorial- Opinion page of the Minneapolis Star, Deeember 13, 1977.) If you'd like a detailed commentary/explanation of it and a copy of the bill itself, let me know. Then (or before then) let y,our legislators knOw how yo~ feel about it! Support from the followingy-as groups or individuals--will be needed: Local officials who budget for control of drunken drivers Motorists who share the road with drunken driuers Pedestrians who cross streets used by drunken drivers Police officers who must arrest d~unken drivers Chemical dependency workers wh6 repair drunken drivers TAXPAYERS WHO PAY FOR ALL OF THE ABOVE. Please do something. Like calling or writing your legislators. Like asking your local officials and others to do the same. Proj. eet Director i323 the, ,,minneap°lis~ .... star.. ' / 8A ' Tuesday, December 15, 1~77 ~1 Drink tax wOuld'finance handling of drunken drivers By STEPHEN ALNES _ The Star's Editor|al Editor A proposal to make drinkers pay the costs of dealing with drunken drivers was introduced in the last session of the Minne- sota Legislature and will be up for consid- eration in the next session. What it would probably mean is that most drinks bought in a bar would cost about a nickel more. The proceeds would be used to reimburse government forstbe costs of arresting, suspected drunk drivers, prosecuting them, paying public defend- ers, presentence assessments, jail terms and detoxification services. The. tax would not actually be imposed by the drink. Rather it would be' imposed on the gross receipts of wholesalers from their sales to on-sale establishments. The tax would be imposed at the rate of 5 cents an ounce of distilled liquor, 5 cents per 12 ounces of beer and 5.cent~ per 4 ounces of The assumption, of course, is that the 0n-sale es. tablishments would pass that ad- ditional cost through to the imbiber at the sameJ rate. The proceeds would be about $23 million a year. Sponsors of the legislation ~re Reps. John Arlandson, DFL-Golden X~alley; Rob- err Ellingson, DFL-Brooklyn Center; Ar- nold Kempe, DFL-West St. Paul; Ken Nel- son, DFL-Minneapolis, and Raymond Al- brecht, IR-Brownto.n, and Sen~. David Schaaf, DFL-Fridley, and Robert Benedict, DFL-Bloomington. , But much of the rationale for the bill was developed by Forst Lowery, who is director of the t'~lennepin County Alcohol Safety Action Project. He says it cost Min- nesota taxpayers inore than $11 million last year to try to control drunken drivers. "It was ~ modest effort,/nore effective than, most other states' programs, but short of what's needed to approach cbn- trol," he says. "We arrested fewer than 'one percent of the drunks on the road at any given time." He says Minnesota has good laws deal- ing with drunk driving and the bill wouldn't change them. What it would do is. "shift the existing costs of controlling the drunken driver from the general tax- payer ~ho pays those costs now to con- sumers of on-sale alcoholic beverages." It would also increase the amount of en- forcement which communities can afford. The proceeds of the tax would be appro- priated to the state commissioner of public safety, who would distribute it to state, county Or municipal governments which provide various services in the enforce- ment of drunk driving laws. For example, each governmental unit · would receive $150 for each drunk driving arrest it makes. Lowery explains that ar- resting drunken drivers is a time-consum-' lng, complicated and hence costly kind of police work. A DWI arrest involves, among other things, patrolling to observe driving actions which indicate possible DWI, stopping a suspected driver, prelimi- nary testing or observation to substantiate arrest, arrest, arranging for protection of the suspect's car through towing or other disposition, informing the suspect of.the meaning of the implied consent law and of' rights involving testing, makifig or arrang- ing for t~ests, booking, detaining when al~- propriate, checking driving and criminal records for prior offenses and. outstanding warrants and of course the preparation of all of the reports and verifications re- quired. A DWI arrest takes more tim~ ahd vast-. ly more paper than most felony arrests, LSwery says. In 1974 the direct labor cost for the time of arresting officers was $123, he adds. ' ' The bill also would provide $100 to the jurisdiction handling the prosecution, $100 for each case involving the public defend- er, $35 for each presentence investigation or assessment of problem drinking, $25 for each day of incarceration of the drunk driver, $50 l~r day f0i' Use ~fl deti3xifica- tion centers and $15. per hour for police extra-duty time spent on drunk driving pa-' trolling. · - ' · Funds also would be provided to the .at- torney general to meet costs of represent- ing the state in some cases, to reimburse departments, agencies or facilities for edu- cation, treatment and rehabil~ ~ion, to the driver license and motor ~ :cie license programs for services direr:.~ related to alcohol or drug r~?.ated vioI~t;.oas, to help finance some ,~,' 'qties of the Bureau of Criminal Appr:: ~ion, for an information and educatio~ ,,...~.~,ram~ dealing with drunk- driving, to cc' : ~t regional and statewide training cou~.~ :3 and seminars, and so on. The estimated cost the first year would be: about $19 million. · - ': . "If somebody wants to call this a bounty' system," says Lowery, "it may very well be a good description. It's h'ard to think of ' a more deserving species to put a bounty on than drunken drivers, or a better source of funds to pay the .bounty than a nickel-a-. 'drink bar tax." ' i324 Summary S. F. 865 (Schaaf, Benedict) H. F. 1981 (Arlandson, Ellingson, A. Kempe', K. Nelson, Albrecht) Purpose: To shift costs of controlling drunken drivers from general- tax funds to consumers of on-sale alcoholic beverages; to increase drunken driving arrests and provide for costs of increased drunken driver control, including education and rehabilitation programs. Taxes at wholesale, alcoholic beverages for re-sale by the drink at t-~e equivalent of "a nickel a drink". Reimburses government units for drunk driving control services at rate 'of $150 per DWI arrest; $100 per prosecution; $100 per public defender case; $35 per presentence alcohol problem assessment; $25 per day of jail; $50 per day of detox; $15 per hour of extra-duty police patrolling for DWI. Pays for following existing drunk driving control costs and anticipated increases with increased arrests: Department of Public Safety and Attorney General alcohol-related traffic functions -- implied consent hearings -- drivers license actions -- Bureau of Criminal Apprehension chemical testing and training -- information and education. New programs: Training and coordination seminars for those dealing W~th alcohol-traffic problems. Grants to counties and municipalities for DWI prevention and control programs Also prpvides: "Client fee" for rehabilitation and probation monitoring to be paid for by offender--Payment by state for indigents. Payment for extended or inpatient treatment up to $750 if no other source of non-public payment Revenue:. $28 million annually Cost: assuming 30,000 DWI arrests $19 million first year, Motor Vehicle Deaths 1974 1975 1976 U.S. 46,200 46,000 47,100 Minnesota 852 77,7 807 Half of all motor vehicle deaths are alcohol related. Based on half of the deaths above, alcohol related traffic accident cost estimates are: 1974 1975 1976 U.S. $ 8,316,000,000 $ 10,580,000,000 $ 10,833,000,000 Minnesota $ 153,360,000 $ 178,710,000 $ 185,610 000 1323 OMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS [] LAND SURVEYORS ~11 SITE PLANNERS December 20, 1977 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Sewage flows from Spring Park, Minn~trista & Shorewood Through Mound - status report Dear Mr. Kopp: As requested, we have started work on establishing the sewer flows through Mound from Spring Park, Minn~trista and Shorewood. The connections where the flows will be monitored and our proposed method of establishing these flows are as follows: SPRING PARK The flow from Sprinq Park~ is presently metered at a lift station and the readings tranmitted over telephone lines to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Seneca Plant in Egan. We will check the accuracy of the meter and the transmission over a one day period. MINNETRISTA - SHOREWOOD The flow into Island Park goes through two MWCC lift stations. Running time meters have recently been installed on these lift stations. We will ca~L~ the pumpinq rates of the stations and monitor the runnin~ time meters for a one week period to determine the flow from these stations. MINNETRISTA - CTY. RD. 110 North of Mound In order to monitor this flow, we will have to install a portable flow recorder in 2 manholes. We will monitor the flow in each manhole for a period of one week. The total flow from this area will be the sum of the flows through the 2 manholes. 12805 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 TELEPHONE (612) 559-3700 22 NORTH MAIN STREET, HUTCHINSON, MINNESOTA 55350 TELEPHONE (612) 879-8029 SOUTHWEST ENGINEERING DIVISION, MARSHALL, MINNESOTA 56258 TELEPHONE (507) 532-5820 Mr. Leonard Kopp December 20, 1977 Page Two MINNETRISTA - West of the Bluffs We will monitor this flow by installing a flow recorder in a manhole for a period of one week. We would hope that we can get all of our monitoring done by early February at which time we will compare the~ actual measured flows against the estimated flows used by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and report this information to the Council. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:ts 132.,. _ _ _~L_~_.--~___.__ west hennepin human services planning board ~ 41s! and Vernon South / St. Louis Park, Minnesota Dear West Hennepin Human Services is sponsoring the conference, Positive Parenting: A Conference on Issues Facing Parents Today. It is our hope that information of the conference reach as many West Hennepin residents as possible, to offer them the chance to attend. The following news release was developed with the hope that area providers could include it in their newsletters and other forms of communication. We would appreciate any help you could give us in publicizing the conference. We hope it will be a valuable experience for those who participate. Sincerely, Gary Kelsey West Henn. Human Services Community Planning Worker GK: icn Encl. PoS. A resource table will be availa'ble at the conference. If your organization has literature that you would like displayed, please mail or bring it to the W H.H.S. office. wast hennepin human services planning board 41st end Vernon South / St. Louis Perk, Minnesota 55416 DECEMBER 27, 1977 NEWS R'ELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT GARY KELSEY, 920-5533 ISSUES FACI~!G PARENTS TO BE DISCUSSED "PosITIVE PARENTING: A CONFERENCE ON ISSUES FACING PARENTS TODAY" WILL TAKE PLACE FEBRUARY 4, 1978; 8:00 - 3:30, AT HOPKINS EISENHOWER HIGH SCHOOL, THE COiqFERE~CE IS SPONSORED BY W, H, H",'"'S, AND SlX AREA SCHOOL DISTRICTS, THE CONFERENCE FEE OF $2,00 COVERS ALL ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING LUNCH, THE KEYNOTE SPEAKER WILL BE RAY ~CGEE FROM WASHBURN CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER, WORKSHOP TOPICS ARE FAMILY VIOLENCE, STAGES OF CRISIS, COMMUNICATION AND SELF ESTEEI~, PARENT POWER: DEALING WITH SCHOOLS, AND PARENTS AS CAREER INFLUENCERS, FOLLOWING LUNCH, A GROUP OF AREA YOUTH WILL PRESENT A SOCIODRAHA DEPICTING A DAY IN THE LIFE OF AN ADOLESCENT, PRE-REGISTRATION IS A HUST AND SHOULD BE I~ BY JANuARy L5, 197~S, FOR REGISTRATION FORMS OR FURTHER INFORMATION, CALL WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES AT 920-5533, 30O 301 311 312 313 31z, 399 401 498 500 5O2 510 526 546 551 556 561 565 571 575 59O 598 599 6OO 611 612 ~13 698 SALES C.[TY OF MOUND MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FU INCOME STATEMENT NgVEMBER 30, 1977 CURRENT PERIO0 AMOUNT RAT lO LI~OUR $ 18,821 ,L'~ E 7,938 19.38 dE~R 13, ~.99 32.95 OTHER 107 1.73 i'O TAL SALES $ 40,965 100.00 11 MONTHS YEAR-TO-DATE AMOUNT RATIO gob, ll~* 43. 64,176 13 190,742 40. 9,037 1 ;*-fO, 069 1 00. O{ COSTS OF-SALES $ 31,5~.3 TOTAL COSTS $ 31,543 ~?.00 $ 361,953 77.0( 77.00 $ 361,953 77. GROSS PROF[]' $ 9,422 23.00 $ 108,116 EXPENSES SALARIES MANAGER $ 1,400 3.42 $ 15,400 B SALARIES, SELLING 1,843 ,%.50 25,999 5. ADV ER'i' I SING OEPRECIAI!ON 2550 .85 INSURANCE 600 1.46 REN l ........ 835 2.04 REPAIRS 45 SUPPLI ES 576 TAXES, PAYROLL 131 CLEANING JANITOR & LAUNDRY 189 TRAVEL 11 AUDIT 130 UTiLITIES 569 MISCELLANGOUS 5 .11 1.41 .32 3,850 .8; 7,236 1.5, 8,698 · 1. 3/,2 . 2,973 . 5,763 1.23 .~6 1,952 .03 . 182 .32 2,580 1.39 3,915 Ol 909 10TAL EXPENSES $ 6,68z, 16.32 $ 79,799 16.9 OPERATING INCO,qE OR {LOSS) $ 2,738 $ 28,317 HER INCOME .......... INTEREST INCOME $ 1,904 INVENTORY VARI Al'ION ~,271 MISCELLANEOUS 21 797 IUIAL OTHER INCOME $ 21 $ 6,972 NET INCOME $ 2,759 $ 35,289 O EE -T Accou TI O /3/f ...**.**..****.LAST YEAR.............,,. CURRENT PE R! OD YEAR-TO-DATE A MOUNT RAT IO ANOUN T R AT I 0 19,633 68.28 $ 215~ 211 65.62 6,611 16.26 59,656 12.59 13,699 33.68 189~ 122 39.91 725 1.78 9,833 2 ,,08 60,668 1 00.00 $ 673,822 100.00 314 77. O0 $ 36z~, 863 77.00 31,316 77.,00 9,356 23. O0 3/)6, 863 77.00 108,979 23.00 175 2,226 3~0 600 582 30 7 74.9 478 .86 1.48 1.63 .75 1 - 86. 1.18 2.89 $ 12,925 2.73 5.67 26,466 5.58 92 .02 3,150 .66 7~ 522 1.59 8,715 1.86 2, 2z~9 21 038 6~ 089 °86 166 .35 · 9 .... · 02 130 .32 356 .88 636 .13 1,190 267 .06 2,370 °50 3, 886 °82 756 .16 7,106 17. $,7 $ 76,327 2,250 S 32,652 16.11 17 $ 17 $ $ 2~267 $ 1, 716 b57 2,806 35,458 98 (99 100 106 110 112 132 139 158 159 161 163 169 199 CITY OF HOUND MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET NCVEMBER 30, 1977 CURRENT ASSETS CASH ON HAND CASH IN iJANK INVESTMENTS LOAN lO GENERAL FUI~D INVENTORY PRLPAID EXPENSES ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS FIXEO ASSETS FURNITUP, E EQUIPMENT FIXTURES ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION LEASEHOLD I MPROVEI~iENTS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION NET FIXED ASSETS TOTAL ASSETS 1,845 54,549 27,200 3,880 70,180 4,949 $ 162,603 40,089 ( 26, g67) 5,866 ( 1,600) i7,388 $ 179,991 GrEEN-T ACCOUNTING 12 Nt3VEMBER 2~0, 1977 PAGE 2! 2OO 201 203 205 2].0 220 23,9 280 ;'82 CURRENT LIABILITIES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE TRADE' SALES TAX PAYABLE -ACCRUED EXPENSES (.ASH OVER OR SHORT LIABILITIES AND TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITIES FUNL) BALANCE [RANSFERS OUT NET INCOME SUSPENSE TOTAL E~dlTY TUIAL LIABJLIHES ANO E{)bITY E ~U I TY 11,038 1,883 ! 74) 165,355 33,500) 35,289 $ $ 12,847 12,847 167,143 179,991 6REE N-T ACCOUNTING