The URL can be used to link to this page

2016-06-28 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, JUNE 28, 2016 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Page 1. Opening meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent A ems: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff, recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence. Separate introduction or further supi2ort from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate. 4. *Consent Agenda *A. Approve payment of claims 5. 1394- 1420 *B. Approve minutes: June 14, 2016 Regular Meeting 1421 - 1427 *C Approve Policy ADMIN -004 Tax Increment Financing 1428- 1437 *D Approve Resolution to approve Public Gathering Permit and Musical Concert 1438- 1447 Permit and reducing fees for Westonka Community& Commerce Dog Days to be 1439 held on Saturday, August 6, 2016 on Auditors Road in the Harbor District *E Approve Resolution approving sign variation/modification for Mount Olive 1448 - 1458 Lutheran Church, 5218 Bartlett Boulevard 1450 *F Approve Resolution approving Public Lands Permit for 51 XX Drummond Road 1459- 1461 1460 *G Approve Resolution approving variance for 51XX Drummond Road 1462- 1464 Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Pat Gorman, President of the Westonka Jaycees, requesting action on a resolution 1465 accepting Westonka Jaycees donation to parks for 2016 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS Planning Commission Recommendations Indian Knoll Manor Renovation and New Construction Project 1466- 1596 2020 Commerce Boulevard and 5524 Spruce Road Applicant: Aeon Public Hearing(s) for review of Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat (PC Case No. 16-15), Rezoning (PC Case No. 16-20) and Conditional Use Permit (PC Case No. 16-16) Applications Consideration of Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide property at 5524 Spruce Road (PC Case No. 16-14) Consideration of Variance (PC Case No. 16-17) Application Consideration of Expansion Permit (PC Case No. 16-18) Application Consideration of Proposed Conveyance of HRA Property for Consistency with Comprehensive Plan Requested Actions: Approve Resolution adopting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 1470 5524 Spruce Road Adopt Ordinance approving rezoning of 5524 Spruce Road from R-2 1475 Two Family Residential to R-3 Multiple Family Residential iii. Approve Resolution determining conformity with Comprehensive Plan 1477 regarding conveyance of HRA property at 2020 Commerce Boulevard iv. Approve Resolution to approve Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat for 1478 Indian Knoll Manor Approve Resolution granting approval of Conditional Use Permits, 1482 Expansion Permits and Variances for Indian Knoll Manor Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Councilmembers B. Reports: C. Minutes: Parks and Open Spaces Commission — May 12, 2016 1597- 1599 D. Correspondence: Mediacom -- June 17, 2016 1600 9. Adjourn This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting agendas may be viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site ,f th uinp,pnd COUNCIL BRIEFING JUNE 289 2016 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! June 28 — 6:45 — HRA Regular Meeting June 28 — 7:00 — CC Regular Meeting June 30 — 5:00— Surfside Pale Ale Tapping and Tasting, Harbor Wine and Spirits June 30 — 6:00 — Music in the Park, Harbor District Greenway July 12 — 6:55 — HRA Regular Meeting July 12 — 7:00 — CC Regular Meeting July 15/16 — Spirit of the Lakes July 26 — 6:00 — Council Workshop (Administrative Citations) July 26 — 6:55 — HRA Regular Meeting July 26 — 7:00 — CC Regular meeting Aug 2 — Night 2U-Nite Aug 6 — Tour De Tonka Aug 6 —Dog Days Aug 10 — 6:55 — HRA Regular Meeting (Rescheduled 8-9-16) Aug 10 — 7:00 — CC Regular Meeting (Rescheduled 8-9-16 City Offices Closed 4 July — 4" of July Observance City Official's Absences Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Some votes require more than a simple majority and Staff needs to plan accordingly. Inquire in advance, please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision- making. City of Mound Claims 06-28-16 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2016 616ESCROWREF $ 2,224.73 2016 0616CTYAN $ 41464.77 2016 1Q16BLDGSRCH $ 11951.38 2016 0516BOLTMNK $ 162,760.30 2016 0516HOISINGT $ 4,044.11 2016 0. 98,821.71 2016 062816CITY $ 921,554.34 �'TCITAL CLAIMS ■', 9I -1394- CITY OF MOUND 06/14/1610:13 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: June 2016 ki:Ys. aAABt'J. Batch Name 616ESCROWREF User DollarAmt $2,224.73 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $2,224.73 $0.00 In Balance Refer _ 5 ANDERSON, JOHN _ Cash Payment G 101-23313 5325 WATERBURY PC 14-1 ESCROW REFUND- 5325 WATERBURY RD $615.75 VAR APP- PC 14-19- J. ANDERSON Invoice 061416 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $615.75 _Refer 3 ERICKSON, SCOTT- WAYZATA _ Cash Payment G 101-23305 4861 SHORELINE #14-10 & ESCROW REFUND- 4861 SHORELINE DR $934.00 VAR APP PC 14-11-S. ERICKSON Invoice 061416 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $934.00 Refer 1 JESBERG, JEFF Cash Payment G 101-23297 JESBERG-1728 FINCH LN -P ESCROW REFUND- 1728 FINCH LN VAR $87.23 APP -PC 14-02-J. JESBERG Invoice 061416 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $87.23 Refer _ 4 KENNEDY, PAUL & SANDY Cash Payment G 101-23312 5168 TUXEDO BLVD PC 14- ESCROW REFUND- 5168 TUXEDO $372.75 VARIANCE APP PC 14-18- P. & S. KENNEDY Invoice 061416 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $372.75 ReferWmn2 PRICE, FRED Cash Payment G 101-23298 BENCHMARK -2308 DRIFTW ESCROW REFUND- 2308 DRIFTWOOD EXP $215.00 PERMIT PC 14-03- F. PRICE Invoice 061416 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $215.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $2,224.73 $2,224.73 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,224.73 Total $2,224.73 -1395- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2016 06/16/16 10:40 AM Page 1 OrT2T73«�' Batch Name 0616CTYMAN User DollarAmt $4,464.77 FUEL- WELL #3 Payments Computer DollarAmt $4,464.77 Invoice 6974-272066 5/27/2016 $0.00 In Balance Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Refer _ 6 CARQUESTAUTO PARTS (FIRE) _ Refer 2 G & K SERVICES Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair MINI HD FUSE HOLDER CARD- FIRE UNIT #43 $3.67 Invoice 6974-271368 5/18/2016 $109.15 Invoice 1006719506 5/30/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SWAY BAR BUSHINGS, BRK CAL W/ HDW- $143.22 HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 6-06-16 RMFD FIRE #26 Invoice 1006730855 6/6/2016 Invoice 6974-272247 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750460 Janitorial Services Transaction Date 6/15/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $146.89 Refer 1 CARQUEST OF NA VARRE(PA49 _ W Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 3/8 INTL TORX T50 WATER DEPT $4.59 Invoice 6974-270711 5/9/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply CARHART SEATCOVERS, WEATHERTECH $440.00 LINER BACK RACK LIGHT MOUNT- NEW PARKS TRUCK #416 Invoice 6974-270742 5/10/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply WHITE & AMBER LED STROBES- PARKS $457.09 TRUCK#416 Invoice 6974-270747 5/10/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply PCV SPLIT LOOM, WIRE FRAME CLIPS, $13.61 VINYL WIRE GROMMET- TRUCK #316 Invoice 6974-270823 5/11/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply OIL & FUEL FILTERS- #1504 PARKS TRUCK $44.88 Invoice 6974-271050 5/13/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply AIR & OIL FILTERS, #109 WATER TRUCK $12.28 Invoice 6974-271501 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply OIL & FUEL FILTERS- #205 PARKS TRUCK $6.16 Invoice 6974-271529 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply BALL MOUNT, HITCH BALL $46.06 Invoice 6974-271542 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply COUPLER #202 SEWER - $6.11 Invoice 6974-271825 5/25/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies FUEL, FUEL FILTER, STARTING FLUID- $8.69 WELL #3 Invoice 6974-272065 5/27/2016 Cash Payment E 60149400-210 Operating Supplies FUEL- WELL #3 $5.14 Invoice 6974-272066 5/27/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,044.61 Refer 2 G & K SERVICES _ Cash Payment E 60949750460 Janitorial Services HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 5-30-16 $109.15 Invoice 1006719506 5/30/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-460 Janitorial Services HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 6-06-16 $109.15 Invoice 1006730855 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750460 Janitorial Services HWS -MAT SVC & SUPPLIES 6-13-16 $109.15 Invoice 1006742260 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $327.45 Refer 3 G & K SERVICES -1396- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006719513 5/30/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006719513 5/30/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms Invoice 1006730860 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-21.0 Operating Supplies Invoice 1006730860 6/6/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Refer M 4 G & K SERVICES UNIFORM SVC 5-30-16 PARKS MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5-30-16 PARKS UNIFORM SVC 6-06-16 PARKS MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 6-06-16 PARKS Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 5-23-16 Invoice 1006708147 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 5-23-16 Invoice 1006708147 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 5-23-16 Invoice 1006708147 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5-23-16 Invoice 1006708147 5/23/2016 Project 16-3 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 5-30-16 Invoice 1006719511 5/30/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 5-30-16 Invoice 1006719511 5/30/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 5-30-16 Invoice 1006719511 5/30/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 5-30-16 Invoice 1006719511 5/30/2016 Project 16-3 Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6-06-16 Invoice 1006730858 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6-06-16 Invoice 1006730858 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms UNIFORM SVC 6-06-16 Invoice 1006730858 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies MAT SVC & SHOP SUPPLIES 6-06-16 Invoice 1006730858 6/6/2016 Project 16-3 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 10 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-361 General Liability Ins DEDUCTIBLE 2014 HEAVY RAIN EVENTS - SEWER BACKUPS- CLAIM # C0031849 Invoice 061616 Transaction Date Refer 6/13/2016 6/16/2016 7 MED/ACOM 06/16/16 10:40 AM Page 2 $46.62 $84.18 $53.40 $183.16 $367.36 $46.19 $41.02 $56.11 $140.84 $44.38 $39.21 $54.30 $90.68 $42.46 $44.08 $46.74 $146.08 $792.09 $1,000.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,000.00 Cash Payment E 10142110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 46-16-16 THRU 7- $85.90 15-16 Invoice 061616 6/6/2016 Transaction Date 6/14/2016 Refer 5 TRUE VALUE HWS Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134267 5/6/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 TOILET BOWL CLEANER- HWS -1397- Total $85.90 $4.79 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2016 06/16/16 10:40 AM Page 3 Invoice 134492 5/14/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair GE 25 W CLEAR TUBE BULB -ENGINE 311- $9.88 FIRE DEPT Invoice 134503 5/14/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 135001 5/28/2016 Transaction Date 6/15/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 9 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PWPKS) _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply TECH STAIN REMOVER, LESTOIL HD Total 5/11/2016 CLEANER Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies TRASH BAGS, NATURAL CLEANER, SINGLE $37.96 E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS EDGE BLADES- HWS 5/3/2016 Invoice 134478 5/13/2016 E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies TORR BIT SOCKET Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies 3 QTY 2 PKS 3V LITHIUM BATTERIES $43.25 Invoice 135002 5/28/2016 5/10/2016 Cash Payment Transaction Date 6/15/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $86.00 Refer 8 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE) _ Cash Payment Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair 4 PK RELEASE CLAMP, 100 PK 6" BLACK $11.97 CABLE TIES, #43 -SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS - FIRE DEPT Invoice 134492 5/14/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair GE 25 W CLEAR TUBE BULB -ENGINE 311- $9.88 FIRE DEPT Invoice 134503 5/14/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS- FIRE DEPT Invoice 135001 5/28/2016 Transaction Date 6/15/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 9 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PWPKS) _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply TECH STAIN REMOVER, LESTOIL HD Total Invoice 134395 5/10/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134419 5/11/2016 CLEANER Invoice 134158 5/3/2016 5/12/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS Invoice 134173 5/3/2016 E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies TORR BIT SOCKET Invoice 134381 5/9/2016 5/5/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply 1.2 OZ SMOKE GREY ENAMEL, 36G & 60G 5/10/2016 Cash Payment FLAP DISCS Invoice 134395 5/10/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134419 5/11/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134442 5/12/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 134631 5/18/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 134667 5/19/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 134232 5/5/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134390 5/10/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 134451 5/12/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 134595 5/17/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply invoice 134637 5/18/2016 3/8" PLASTIC CLAMP, FEXIBLE TUBING, 18 GA PRIM WIRE 4 POLE MALE CONNECTOR PRO DECK SCRUB BRUCH, CONNECTOR SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, GLASS CLEANER, FORMULA 409, RUST STAIN REMOVER 1/2 DIAG CUT PLIERS, 40W APPLIANCE SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS POL GAS CYLINDER, HOSE MENDER, MINI CLAMP BULLET EDGER- COPPER- PARKS -1398- $7.11 $28.96 $13.48 $3.50 $7.19 $21.17 $14.82 $4.49 $10.33 $5.85 $12.03 $22.29 $8.93 $11.32 $18.25 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2016 06/16/16 10:40 AM Page 4 -1399- Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply CONNECTOR RETURN, RED NIPPLE, HVY $14.36 OPEN S HK ZN- PARKS Invoice 134638 5/18/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 60 LB CONCRETE MIX $44.47 Invoice 134656 5/18/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, #2 PHILLIPS $16.88 POWER TIPS Invoice 134685 5/19/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $9.44 Invoice 134728 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 10145200-210 Operating Supplies 13 GAL KITCHEN BAGS $16.18 Invoice 134887 5/25/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS, 1 X 3 PHILLIPS $10.20 SCREWDRIVER, 2 KEYS Invoice 134889 5/25/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies 100 PK 10 3/4 CABLE TIES $1259 Invoice 134955 5/26/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 100'1/4" PROOF CHAIN $105.46 Invoice 134973 5/27/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply WHITE VERTICAL FLIP COVER- SEWER $5.39 TRUCK Invoice 134255 5/5/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply SQUARE U -BOLT 3/8 X 16X5X4 $8.98 Invoice 134399 5/10/2016 Project 16-3 Cash Payment E 281-45210-210 Operating Supplies 17 OZ FLUORESCENT MARKING PAINT $6.29 Invoice 134359 5/9/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS $11.45 Invoice 134435 5/11/2016 Cash Payment E 10143100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 4" WHITE CHIP BRUSHES, 3" PAINT BRUSH, $16.88 6 YDS PACKING TAPE Invoice 134671 5/19/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 11" ROLLER PAINT TRAY, 4" COVER FRAME $9.88 Invoice 134674 5/19/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 4" 3/8 COVER $4.49 Invoice 134714 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply GAL PAINAT THINNER $10.34 Invoice 134715 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 9" BUCKET ROLL GRID $3.59 Invoice 134718 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maine Supply 18" PREMIUM BUNGEE CORD $1.79 Invoice 134724 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply 12 PACK -4" 3/8 COVER, 4" ROLLER FRAME $8.61 Invoice 134735 5/20/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 4 PK ASSORTED SHARPIES $6.74 Invoice 134828 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies 6 YDS PACKING TAPE $8.09 Invoice 134835 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply DANDELION WEEDER, FLORAL SHOVEL $31.48 Invoice 134872 5/24/2016 -1399- CITY OF MOUND Payments 06/16/16 10:40 AM Page 5 Current Period: June 2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies GLADE FRESHENER & SPRAY, CASCADE, $22.00 DAWN DISH SOAP, LYSOL WIPES, JET DRY RINSE- PUB WRKS SHOP Invoice 134892 5/25/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134907 5/25/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134927 5/26/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 134931 5/26/2016 Transaction Date 6/15/2016 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND Project 16-3 2 PK 9V ALKALINE BATTERIES, 4PK AA $14.83 LITHIUM BATTERIES- WATER DEPT CLEANERIPOLISH, HOME DEFENSE INSECT $19.77 KILLER, PUB WRKS SHOP Project 16-3 2 PK AA ALKALINE BATTERIES, 4PK AA $11.68 LITHIUM BATTERIES- WATER DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Total $585.51 10100 Wells Fargo $1,996.22 $175.85 $6.29 $263.68 $1,609.28 $413.45 $4,464.77 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $4,464.77 Total $4,464.77 1400- Pjhlt1[011111 Payments 06/14/16 11:14 AM Page 1 Current Period: June 2016 P.�l ` • 4` •. "... '" 4. P, u�*tl•�•c'21",, N, ,.tet e;d`@�+�A` Nt P• ;.,. Y. 4`�d\V,,.. X ..K •. h Batch Name IQ16BLDGSRCH User Dollar Amt $1,951.38 Payments ComputerpollarAmt $1,951.38 $0.00 In Balance Refer 3 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS Ck# 054161 E 6/14/2016 Cash Payment G 101-20800 Due to Other Governments 1st Quarter Bldg Surcharge 2016 $1,951.38 Invoice 03312016 5/1/2016 Transaction Date 6/10/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,951.38 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $1,951.38 $1,951.38 Pre -Written Checks $1,951.38 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $1,951.38 -1401- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2016 Batch Name 0516BOLTMNK User Dollar Amt $162,760.30 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $162,760.30 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 BOLTONAND MENK, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 402-43120-300 Professional Srvs MSA SYSTEM COORD UPDATE SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 Invoice 0190654 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0190656 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0190651 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0190653 5/31/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Refer 2 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 401-43114-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0190658 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0190659 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0190662 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs SURFACE WATER MGMT SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MAY 202016 STORMWATER UTILITY -SWPPP UPDATE ENG SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 06/22/16 10:33 AM Page 1 $462.00 $112.00 $1,755.00 $265.00 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,594.00 2014 STREET, UTILITY IMPROV PROD. PW14- $2,027.00 01 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs Project PW1401 $330.00 2014 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN $572.00 REPLACE PROJ PW 14-08 ENG SVC THRU $539.00 MAY 20 2016 6/21/2016 Project PW1408 $3,542.00 2014 SANITARY SEWER REHAB -ENG SVC $489.00 THRU MAY 20 2016 PW 14-05 Project PW 1405 E 40143115-303 Engineering Fees SEWER DISCHARGE/ 1&1- ENG SVC THRU $124.00 MAY 20 2016 Invoice 0190663 5/31/2016 Project PW1501 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs GIS UPDATES ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 $330.00 Invoice 0190655 5/31/2016 Project 164 $539.00 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,542.00 Refer 8 BOLTON AND MENK INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 40143115-303 Engineering Fees 2015 GRANDVIEW BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ $11,281.50 Invoice 0190668 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0190661 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0190669 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 401-43135-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0190667 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 675-49425-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0190670 5/31/2016 ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 PW 15-01 Project PW1501 2015 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW15-04 $441.00 ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 Project PW 1504 2015 BARTLETT BLVD WATERMAIN $539.00 REPLACE PROJ PW 15-09 COMMERCE TO LOST LAKE BLVD ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 Project PW1509 2015 TUXEDO BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ ENG $78,828.40 SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 PW 15-02 Project PW 1502 2015 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV PROJ $49.00 PW 15-05 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 -1402- Project PW1505 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: June 2016 06/22/16 10:33 AM Page 2 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA WATERMAIN LOOP BARTLETT TO ISLAND $1,947.00 PARK PROJ 15-10 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 Invoice 0190672 5/31/2016 Project PW1510 Cash Payment G 101-23349 1861 COMMERCE -TRIDENT 1861 COMMERCE BLVD- TRIDENT DEVELOP $847.00 REVIEW FAIRFIELD RD ENGINEER SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 Invoice 0190652 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0190680 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA WOLNER FIELD PARKING LOT ANALYSIS ENG SVC FROM APRIL 9 THRU MAY 20 2016 2015 WILSHIRE BLVD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROV PROJ PW 15-11 ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 $154.00 $1,793.00 Invoice 0190673 5/31/2016 Project PW1511 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95,879.90 Refer-�_ 4 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA 2016 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 16-05 $12,112.75 Invoice 0190679 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 401-43146-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0190678 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 401-43116-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0190674 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 401-43136-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0190675 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 427-43121-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0190681 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 675-49425-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0190682 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 401-43135-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0190657 5/31/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 Project PW1605 2016 CYPRESS-MAYWOOD STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 16-03 ENG SVC THRU RM11yaC Project PW1603 2016 BARTLETT BLVD STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 16-01 ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 Project PW 1601 2016 TUXEDO BLVD EAST STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 16-02 ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 Project PW 1602 2016 CRACK SEAL & SEAL COAT PROJ- PW 16-07-08 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 Project PW 1607 2016 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROV PROJ- PW 16-09 ENG SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 Project PW 1609 2015 TUXEDO BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 PW 15-02 Project PW1502 2015 WILSHIRE BLVD TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROV PROJ PW 15-11 ENG SVC THRU MAY 20 2016 Invoice 0190657 5/31/2016 Project PWi511 Cash Payment G 101-23327 MCESL39 BRADFORD/WIL MCES LS #39 & INTERCEPT REPLACEMENT PROJ -ENGINEERING SVCS THRU MAY 20 2016 $9,214.50 $19,329.15 $13,564.50 $3,383.00 $1,120.50 $264.00 $684.00 $1,072.00 Invoice 0190657 5/31/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60,744.40 -1403- WFIX9T Lc[oil I k,I� Payments Current Period: June 2016 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $3,674.00 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $134,509.05 402 MUNICIPAL ST AID ST CONSTUCT $462.00 427 SEAL COAT FUND $3,383.00 601 WATER FUND $5,535.00 602 SEWER FUND $13,496.75 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $1,700.50 $162,760.30 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $162,760.30 Total $162,760.30 -1404- 06/22/16 10:33 AM Page 3 Payments 06/22/16 4:42 PM Page 1 Current Period: June 2016 Batch Name 0516HOISINGT User Dollar Amt $4,044.11 Payments Computer DollarAmt $4,044.11 $0.00 In Balance Refer 38 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I _ Cash Payment E 10142400-300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS MAY 2016 $1,370.00 Invoice 007-0014-96 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs MISC PLANNING SVCS -PC & CC MTGS $45.36 MILEAGE & TRAVEL R. TRAPP MAY 2016 Invoice 015-015-14 6/10/2016 Cash Payment G 101-23356 4831 SHORELINE DR CUP 4831 SHORELINE DR CUP MISC PLANNING $142.50 SVCS MAY 2016 Invoice 015-015-14 6/10/2016 Cash Payment G 101-23355 PC 16-09 1729 GULL 1729 GULL LN EXP PERMIT- MISC PLANNING $641.25 SVCS MAY 2016 Invoice 015-015-14 6/10/2016 Cash Payment G 101-23349 1861 COMMERCE -TRIDENT 1861 COMMERCE- REZONING PC 16-02 $1,845.00 PLANNING SVCS MAY 2016 Invoice 015-015-14 6/10/2016 _ Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,044.11 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $4,044.11 $4,044.11 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $4,044.11 Total $4,044.11 -1405- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:51 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Batch Name 062816HWS User Dollar Amt $98,821.76 Payments Computer DollarAmt $98,821.76 $0.00 In Balance 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE _ _Refer_ C ash Payment E 60949750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 1937616905 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 1937616905 6/17/2016 Invoice 3105828 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 1921615609 6/4/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 60949750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 1969616008 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 1927617207 6/20/2016 Invoice 8895 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 193616306 6/11/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Due 12/31/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY $287.92 $1.00 $186.72 $52.74 $182.76 $145.44 Total $856.58 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $286.50 Invoice 3107342 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $667.05 Invoice 3105828 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $953.55 Refer 3 BAUHAUS BREW LABS _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1.59.00 Invoice 8895 6/16/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $159.00 Refer 5 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $94.00 Invoice 94113100 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $45.49 Invoice 94113100 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- SHOT CUPS, FLASKS $47.20 Invoice 94113100 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $95.40 Invoice 94119600 6/20/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, SHELF STRIPS, C -FOLD TOWELS $74.50 Invoice 94114100 6/17/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $356.59 Refer y 6 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,689.90 Invoice 54101000 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $34.10 Invoice 54101000 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $170.45 Invoice 54103000 6/17/2016 -1406- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:51 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: June 2016 001111 _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $1.55 Invoice 54103000 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,022.35 Invoice 53997600 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $12.30 Invoice 53997600 6/10/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Transaction Date 6121/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,930.65 Refer 7 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,189.93 Invoice 54010700 6/13/2016 Invoice 17028 6/22/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$91.95 Invoice 54018100 6/13/2016 $175.00 Refer r 9 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,327.85 Invoice 54116400 6/20/2016 $2,563.95 Invoice 1090572062 6/8/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,425.83 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 60949750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS Invoice 94073800 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 94073800 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-255 Misc Merchandise For R 3" CHURCH KEY OPENER Invoice 94073800 6/10/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 $45.17 $32.00 $34.00 Total $111.17 Refer 8 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $72.00 Invoice 303005 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,042.20 Invoice 303006 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $176.00 Invoice 5980 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,290.20 Refer 39BLUESKYMEDIA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 1/4 PAGE AD JUNE 2016 ISSUE WEST $175.00 METRO BUSINESS- HWS Invoice 17028 6/22/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $175.00 Refer r 9 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE _ Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,563.95 Invoice 1090572062 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $96.20 Invoice 1090572063 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $50.80 Invoice 1090575034 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $6,151.20 Invoice 1090575033 6/15/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $8,862.15 Refer <m, 10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE -- - -1407- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:51 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE WINE $173.98 Invoice 1080483093 6/9/2016 Invoice 5815 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Cash Payment $3,571.23 FREIGHT Invoice 1080483092 6/9/2016 $6.75 Invoice 5815 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $959.43 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Invoice 1080485673 6/16/2016 10100 Total $317.75 Refer Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,530.68 Invoice 1080485671 6/16/2016 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER 6/9/2016 $55.95 Invoice 1080485672 6/16/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 101.00 Total $8,291.27 15INDIANISLANDWINERY 11 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST Cash Payment _Refer Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX WINE $241.36 Invoice 0178081711 6/21/2016 Invoice 1133 6/18/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $241.36 Wells Fargo Refer 12 DA_HLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ $103.20 Refer ..mom,.. 16 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,141.00 Cash Payment Invoice 1204896 6/8/2016 $105.00 Invoice 2510333 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $340.00 Invoice 1204940 6/8/2016 E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rosa MIX CREDIT -$90.00 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,481.00 Refer 13 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $311.00 Invoice 5815 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $6.75 Invoice 5815 6/15/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $317.75 Refer 14 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,198.00 Invoice 831488 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,198.00 Refer ,.,a. ..w 15INDIANISLANDWINERY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $103.20 Invoice 1133 6/18/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $103.20 Refer ..mom,.. 16 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $105.00 Invoice 2510333 6/17/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rosa MIX CREDIT -$90.00 Invoice 1495567 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $31.15 Invoice 2524388 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,265.80 Invoice 2524387 6/15/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,311.95 Refer 17 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN SIS CIT( OF MOUND 06/22/164:51 PM Page 4 Payments Refer 18 JOHNSONBROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment Current Period: June 2016 $35.00 Invoice 5466224 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,682.66 Invoice 2524348 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $218.00 Invoice 2524355 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rasa MIX $427.95 Invoice 2524349 6/8/2016 6/15/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,328.61 Refer 19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $192.00 Invoice 5453913 6/1/2016 5/27/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$134.00 Invoice 575065 5/20/2016 20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$9.71 Invoice 575064 5/20/2016 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$5.00 Invoice 576298 6/1/2016 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$40.50 Invoice 576920 6/6/2016 6/8/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2.79 Refer 18 JOHNSONBROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $35.00 Invoice 5466224 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,175.70 Invoice 5466221 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $3,424.00 Invoice 5466222 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $30.00 Invoice 5466223 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,406.29 Invoice 5466225 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$9.71 Invoice 576047 5/27/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,061.28 Refer 20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $43.98 Invoice 5460460 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,444.80 Invoice 5460458 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,924.40 Invoice 5460459 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,934.84 Invoice 5460461 6/8/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,348.02 Refer 21 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 6-3-16 $334.95 Invoice 31967 6/3/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 6-6-16 $36.25 Invoice 31973 6/6/2016 -1409- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:51 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Invoice K-17175549 6/9/2016 -1410- Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 6-9-16 $304.50 Invoice 31989 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 6-13-16 $27.55 Invoice 31995 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $703.25 Refer_ 22 M/NNEHAHA BUILDING MA/NTENA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 5-2-16 @ $51.30 HWS Invoice 928055027 5/22/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 101.00 Total $51.30 23 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC _ _Refer_~ Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals JULY 2016 COMMON AREA MTCE & $679.23 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 062816 7/1/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $679.23 Refer 24 PARLEY LAKE WINERY _ Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $240.00 Invoice 16118 6/16/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $240.00 Refer 25 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE CO_MPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $569.00 Invoice 8551457 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.75 Invoice 8551457 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $207.00 Invoice 8552192 6/20/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 8552192 6/20/2016 _ Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $787.00 Refer 27 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,511.85 Invoice 2993202 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $377.20 Invoice 2993201 6/15/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $64.00 Invoice 2993203 6/15/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,953.05 Refer 26 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,183.15 Invoice 2989262 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $495.20 Invoice 2989263 6/8/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,678.35 Refer 28 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION CO. INC _ -- Cash Payment E 60949750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $189.50 Invoice K-17175549 6/9/2016 -1410- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:51 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Invoice 54414 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Refer 35 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 0153863 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT E 609-49750-265 Freight -$17.96 Invoice 13543-298 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 0153864 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $171.54 Refer 30 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ 6/21/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,985.00 Invoice 1419810 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,008.39 Invoice 1419809 6/16/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,993.39 Refer 29 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,198.00 Invoice 1417110 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $44.16 Invoice 1417108 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,294.50 Invoice 1417109 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,536.66 Refer 32 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $10,970.30 Invoice 00110254 6/21/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Rasa MIX $38.88 Invoice 00110256 6/21/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $25.10 Invoice 00110255 6/21/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,034.28 Refer.. 31 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN Cash Payment E 60949750-252 Beer For Resale BEER - $5,236.00 Invoice 1096206 6/14/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $134.40 Invoice 1096206 6/14/2016 Transaction Date 6/2112016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,370.40 Refer 33 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 60949750-440 Other Contractual Servic REGISTER SOFTWARE TOTAL CARE $1,485.56 KEYSTROKE ANNUAL SUPPORT PLUS KEYSTROKE PROGRAM UPDATES -HWS Invoice 54414 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Refer 35 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 60949750-251 Liquor For Resale Invoice 0153863 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 0153863 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 0153864 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 0153864 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 LIQUOR FREIGHT WINE FREIGHT Total $1,485.56 $120.00 $1.50 $1,105.00 $16.50 Wells Fa- 10100 Total $1,243.00 1411- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:51 PM Page 7 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Dw� k"wdbSA,'A� 34 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ _Refer_ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $112.75 Invoice 0154406 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0154406 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $72.00 Invoice 0154405 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 0154405 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa SODA $104.00 Invoice 0154405 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$160.00 Invoice 0152201 -CM 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight FREIGHT CREDIT $2.50 Invoice 0152201 -CM 6/6/2016 _ Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $146.25 Refer 36 WINE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $444.00 Invoice 428606 6116/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.25 Invoice 428606 6/16/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $730.00 Invoice 428012 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $11.55 Invoice 428012 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,193.80 Refer X37 WINE MERCHANTS_ Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,158.50 Invoice 7085924 6/15/2015 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $19.75 Invoice 7085925 6/15/2015 Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $289.00 Invoice 7084891 6/8/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$82.00 Invoice 7085068 5/25/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,385.25 38 Z WINES USA LLC _ _Refer _ Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $356.00 Invoice 16979 6/21/2016 Cash Payment E 60949750-265 Freight DELIVERY $7.50 Invoice 16979 6/21/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $363.50 -1412- CITY OF MOUND 06/221164:51 PM Page 8 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $98,821.76 $98,821.76 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 '.. Checks to be Generated by the Computer $98,821.76 Total $98,821.76 -1413- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:45 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Refer 5 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $106.6£ Batch Name 062816CITY User DollarAmt $921,554.34 Cash Payment Payments Computer Dollar Amt $921,554.34 $106.68 Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 $0.00 in Balance Refer 1 ABM EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLY, IN _ $154.32 Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SEWER VAC TRUCK NOZZLE -ZIP TUBE 8" $1,815.79 Invoice 0147738 5/27/2016 PO 24636 GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $418.89 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,815.79 Refer 2 ASPEN_ MILLS _ $188.01 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 10 TS WHITE SHIRTS- W/ 20 PATCHES $263.50 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities SEWN ON- DEPT ON LEFT, FLAG ON RIGHT $32.43 Invoice 182212 6/9/2016 _ Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $263.50 Refer_ 3 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies COFFEE, CREAMER, FIREMEN $143.00 Invoice M53676 6/8/2016 - Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $143.00 Refer -1-,--,— 31 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC S_UPP _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-401 Building Repairs 37 LED EXTERIOR REPLACEMENT LIGHT $7,053.13 FIXTURES -PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG Invoice 911346228 6/7/2016 PO 24490 Cash Payment E 101-41930-400 Repairs & Maintenance 37 LED EXTERIOR REPLACEMENT LIGHT $7,053.12 FIXTURES -PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG Invoice 911346228 6/7/2016 PO 24490 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,106.25 Refer � 4 CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC. - Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies DEFIBRILLATION AED ELECTRODES -5 QTY $162.70 Invoice 3299719 6/3/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $162.70 Refer 5 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $106.6£ Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $106.68 Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $154.32 Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 10141910-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $418.89 Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $188.01 Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 Project 16-3 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 $32.43 Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200.383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 4-20-16 TO 5-19-16 DEPOT BLDG $67.11 Invoice 062816 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/17/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,074.13 Refer 35 CITIES DIGITAL SOLUTIONS - 1414- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:45 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Invoice DL060816-26A 6/16/2016 PO 24644 Cash Payment E 101-42115-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice DL060816-26B 6/21/2016 PO 24644 Cash Payment E 101-42400-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice DLO60816-26B 6/21/2016 PO 24644 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $117.74 BUILDOUT- WHELON ION LIGHTHEAD W/ BRACKET- RED/BLUE 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $117.74 BUILDOUT - WHELON ION LIGHTHEAD W/ BRACKET- RED/BLUE Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $585.86 Refer 6 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SOLUTION Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training EMERGENCY RESPONDER TRAINING _ $315.00 COURSE- MAY 2016- M. CATTON Invoice 0621 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training EMERGENCY RESPONDER TRAINING $315.00 COURSE- MAY 2016- J. BROWN Invoice 0621 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training EMERGENCY RESPONDER TRAINING $315.00 COURSE- MAY 2016- C. PALM Invoice 0621 5/23/2016 Transaction Date 6/17/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $945.00 Refer 32 EMERYS TREE SERVICE, INCO_RP _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal REMOVE HAZARDOUS OAK TREE @ $1,185.00 TUXEDO & DEVON MAY 19 2016 Invoice 20701 6/8/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells F, •^^ 10100 Total $1,185.00 �,, 1415- Cash Payment E 101-42400-440 Other Contractual Servic SCAN VARIANCE PLANNING FILES MARCH $1,114.99 2016 Invoice 37867 3/31/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,114.99 Referm 27 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. _ Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL TIF CONSULTING -ANALYSIS OF $1,840.00 BASE VS CURRENT TIF PARCELS, DEBT ANALYSIS Invoice 70669 6/10/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,840.00 Refer 30 EMERGENCYAUTOMOTIVE TECH _ Cash Payment E 101-42115-500 Capital Outlay FA 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $99.36 BUILDOUT -SOUND -OFF TAIL LIGHT FLASHER, ANTI -THEFT DEVICE Invoice DL060816-26 6/9/2016 PO 24644 Cash Payment E 101-42400-500 Capital Outlay FA 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $99.37 BUILDOUT -SOUND -OFF TAIL LIGHT FLASHER, ANTI -THEFT DEVICE Invoice DL060816-26 6/9/2016 PO 24644 Cash Payment E 101-42115-500 Capital Outlay FA 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $75.83 BUILDOUT -MULTI COLOR RED/BLUE LED LIGHTS W1 BRACKET Invoice DLO60816-26A 6/16/2016 PO 24644 Cash Payment E 10142400-500 Capital Outlay FA 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $75.82 BUILDOUT -MULTI COLOR RED/BLUE LED LIGHTS W1 BRACKET Invoice DL060816-26A 6/16/2016 PO 24644 Cash Payment E 101-42115-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice DL060816-26B 6/21/2016 PO 24644 Cash Payment E 101-42400-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice DLO60816-26B 6/21/2016 PO 24644 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $117.74 BUILDOUT- WHELON ION LIGHTHEAD W/ BRACKET- RED/BLUE 2016 FORD UTILITY EMERGENCY VEHICLE $117.74 BUILDOUT - WHELON ION LIGHTHEAD W/ BRACKET- RED/BLUE Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $585.86 Refer 6 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SOLUTION Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training EMERGENCY RESPONDER TRAINING _ $315.00 COURSE- MAY 2016- M. CATTON Invoice 0621 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training EMERGENCY RESPONDER TRAINING $315.00 COURSE- MAY 2016- J. BROWN Invoice 0621 5/23/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training EMERGENCY RESPONDER TRAINING $315.00 COURSE- MAY 2016- C. PALM Invoice 0621 5/23/2016 Transaction Date 6/17/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $945.00 Refer 32 EMERYS TREE SERVICE, INCO_RP _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal REMOVE HAZARDOUS OAK TREE @ $1,185.00 TUXEDO & DEVON MAY 19 2016 Invoice 20701 6/8/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells F, •^^ 10100 Total $1,185.00 �,, 1415- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:45 PM Page 3 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Refer__ 7 FIELDSTONE FAMILY_HOMES _ Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow NEW CONSTRUCTION ESCROW REFUND- $5,000.00 4560 DENBIGH RD #2014-00775 FIELDSTONE FAMILY HOMES Invoice 062816 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/17/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer .,.wg..,...... 8 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES, l Cash Payment E 222-42260-440 Other Contractual Servic FIRE- LION TOTAL CARE STAY SAFE $1,420.80 PROGRAM-1YEAR Invoice 9292 6/2/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,420.80 Refer 9 FIRE SAFETY USA, INCORPORATE_ Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair RESCUE #42 CHEVY TAHOE- REPAIR $332.80 OPTICOM & LED MODULE Invoice 90443 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair VEHICLE #35 TANKER- INSTALL NEW PUSH $181.00 PULL VALVE HANDLE Invoice 90413 5/27/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $513.80 Refer 28 GIESE, LEROY _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-305 Medical Services SAFETY GLASSES REIMB- L. GIESE $359.46 Invoice 062816 6/21/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-305 Medical Services EYEWEAR -EYE EXAM REIMB- L. GIESE $50.00 Invoice 062816 6/21/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $409.46 Refer u 29 GILLESPIE CENTER _ Cash Payment E 101-41115-430 Miscellaneous SUPPORT DONATION TO GILLESPIE $30,000.00 CENTER 1ST HALF 2016 PYMT Invoice 062816 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30,000.00 J 34 GREEN WITH ENVY LAWN CARE, I _Referµ Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic SPRAY SIDEWALKS FOR WEEDS $935.00 Invoice 24589 6/8/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $935.00 Refer 10 HECKSEL MACHINE SHOP, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply JACK FOR PARKS DEPT $105.10 Invoice 100828 5/26/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $105.10 Refer 11 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY Cash Payment E 475-46386-438 Licenses and Taxes 2016 PROPERTY TAX ON DONATED PARCEL $1,249.52 PID #13-117-24-33-0004 Invoice 062816 6/6/2016 Transaction Date 6/2 112 01 6 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,249.52 Refer 12 LUBE -TECH & PARTN_ERS, LLC _ _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies LIQUID MATERIAL 16 LEVER ACTION HAND $38.73 PUMP Invoice 788515 6/14/2016 Project 16-3 -1416- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:45 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic FABRICATE & WELD BRACKET FOR NEW PAINT SPRAYER- MOUNT TO TRAILER & TEST Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Project 16-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic CHECK TRUCK #202 FOR CODES- RESET; CHANGE OIL & FILTER ON PARKS #1504 - ORDERED TIRES- CHECK PLUMBING ARRANGEMENT FOR PARKS F350 AIRBAGS; CALLED LUBETECH TO PICKUP USED OIL, MADE APPT FOR VAC TRUCK RECALL Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Project 16-5 CHANGE OIL & FILTER ON TRUCK #109 & #205; CHANGE COOLANT HOSES ON HIMOINSA GENERATOR, REFILL & BLEED AIR OUT Project 16-5 REINSTALL FUEL LINES ON WELL #3 GENERATOR, PRIME & STARTED ENGINE Project 16-5 $200.00 $640.00 $660.00 $120.00 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,620.00 Refer 15 MINNESOTA BATTERY LLC _ Cash Payment E 22242260-409 Other Equipment Repair 2 REPLACEMENT BATTERIES - 1998 FORD $130.00 RESCUE #34 Invoice 16191 6/7/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.00 Refer 16 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $77.50 WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 813152 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Refer 17 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA LA Cash Payment E 401-43114-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 31623 6/3/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION- 1674 GULL LN- RESTORATION 2014 STREET IMPROV PROJ- EAST 3 PTS PAVING- PW 14-01 Project PW 1401 $77.50 $2,279.00 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,279.00 Refer 19 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies MAGNETIC DRY ERASE BOARD, MAGNETS, $115.05 3 PK SCISSORS, DRY ERSE MARKERS, 6 PK SHIPPING TAPE, LAMINATING POUCHES, YELLOW CARDSTOCK, HP CYAN INK CARTRIDGE- FIRE DEPT Invoice 843128055001 6/2/2016 PO 24498 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115.05 Refer �18OFFICE DEPOT _ -1417- Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $38.73 .. Refer f 13 MADDEN, GALANTER, HANSON, L _ Cash Payment E 101-49999-300 Professional Srvs LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES - MAY 2016 $165.00 Invoice 062816 6/1/2016 Transaction Date 6/20/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165.00 Refer 14 MIDWEST SERVICES Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic FABRICATE & WELD BRACKET FOR NEW PAINT SPRAYER- MOUNT TO TRAILER & TEST Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Project 16-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic CHECK TRUCK #202 FOR CODES- RESET; CHANGE OIL & FILTER ON PARKS #1504 - ORDERED TIRES- CHECK PLUMBING ARRANGEMENT FOR PARKS F350 AIRBAGS; CALLED LUBETECH TO PICKUP USED OIL, MADE APPT FOR VAC TRUCK RECALL Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic Invoice 1192 6/6/2016 Project 16-5 CHANGE OIL & FILTER ON TRUCK #109 & #205; CHANGE COOLANT HOSES ON HIMOINSA GENERATOR, REFILL & BLEED AIR OUT Project 16-5 REINSTALL FUEL LINES ON WELL #3 GENERATOR, PRIME & STARTED ENGINE Project 16-5 $200.00 $640.00 $660.00 $120.00 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,620.00 Refer 15 MINNESOTA BATTERY LLC _ Cash Payment E 22242260-409 Other Equipment Repair 2 REPLACEMENT BATTERIES - 1998 FORD $130.00 RESCUE #34 Invoice 16191 6/7/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.00 Refer 16 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $77.50 WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 813152 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Refer 17 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA LA Cash Payment E 401-43114-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 31623 6/3/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION- 1674 GULL LN- RESTORATION 2014 STREET IMPROV PROJ- EAST 3 PTS PAVING- PW 14-01 Project PW 1401 $77.50 $2,279.00 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,279.00 Refer 19 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies MAGNETIC DRY ERASE BOARD, MAGNETS, $115.05 3 PK SCISSORS, DRY ERSE MARKERS, 6 PK SHIPPING TAPE, LAMINATING POUCHES, YELLOW CARDSTOCK, HP CYAN INK CARTRIDGE- FIRE DEPT Invoice 843128055001 6/2/2016 PO 24498 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115.05 Refer �18OFFICE DEPOT _ -1417- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:45 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies BINDER CLIPS -SMALL, PERFORATED LEGAL $120.20 - PADS, COPY PAPER -CITY HALL Invoice 842348431001 5/31/2016 PO 24678 Cash Payment E 101-45200-200 Office Supplies NAME PLATE- L. CORDIE- PARKS & OPEN $10.99 SPACE COMMISSION Invoice 842347940001 6/3/2016 PO 24678 Transaction Date 6/20/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $131.19 Refer 20 ORONO, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-42110-440 Other Contractual Servic 2ND HALF 2016 CONTRACTED POLICE $831,897.50 SERVICE Invoice 20140682 6/9/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $831,897.50 Refer,,,W..w�.�....�,. 21 PRO HYDRO -TESTING LLC _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs HYDRO TESTING DOT STORAGE $400.00 CYLINDERS- QTY 8- FIRE DEPT Invoice 10300 6/1/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $400.00 Refer 22 SCHARBER AND SONS OF LONG L Cash Payment E 101-45200-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs CLEAN & REPAIR CARB GASKETS- PARKS $102.47 EQUIPMENT Invoice L09946 5/18/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply HANDLE MOLDING, ULTRA 5 GAL MIX $121.72 DISPLAY- PARKS Invoice P43527 5/18/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $224.19 Refer 37 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORA _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-401 Building Repairs SVC CALL- ELEVATOR #1 PUBLIC SAFETY $331.64 BLDG 5-26-16 Invoice 7152349940 617/2016 Cash Payment E 101-41930-400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC CALL- ELEVATOR #1 PUBLIC SAFETY $331.63 BLDG 5-26-16 Invoice 7152349940 6/7/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 101.00 Total $663.27 Refer 23 SUN NEWSPAPERS -HWS ACCT. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-328 Employment Advertising SALESCLERK HELP WANTED AD- HWS- 6- $111.00 11-16 Invoice 366225 6/12/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.00 Refer 36 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY Cash Payment E 101-41110-351 Legal Notices Publishing LEGAL NTCE PUBLISHED- ORDINANCE 06- $15.42 2016- AMEND CHAPTER 6 - CHANGING ALLOWED TIME FOR ON -SALE CONSUMPTION OF LIQUOR ON SUNDAYS FROM 10 A.M. TO 8 A.M. Invoice 3666673 6/18/2016 Transaction Date 6/22/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Referµ 24 VER/ZON WIRELESS Total $15.42 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 5-11 - $35.01 16 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 -1418- CITY OF MOUND 06/22/164:45 PM Page 6 Payments Current Period: June 2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON $35.01 DATACARD SVC 5-11-16 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Project 16-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD $35.01 SVC 5-11-16 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Project 16-3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 5-11-16 $17.51 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 5-11-16 $17.50 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY $35.01 OFFICER 5-11-16 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT#39 RESCUE $35.01 UTILITY 5-11-16 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #40 5-11-16 $35.01 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 5-11-16 $35.01 - THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #31.5 DATACARD SVC 5-11- $35.01 16 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #512 L. GIESE DATACARD $35.01 SVC 5-11-16 THRU 6-10-2016 Invoice 9766833701 6/10/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $350.10 Refer 25 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC 5.03-16 THRU6-02-16 CITY $4,681.35 OWNED STREET LIGHTS Invoice 503779674 6/3/2016 Transaction Date 6/21/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,681.35 Refer 26 XCEL ENERGY _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC -4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $125.40 Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 DEPOT $52.73 BLDG Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 Cash Payment E 101-41930-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $3,672.45 ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $1,426.90 ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $3,961.17 ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $1,582.66 ELECTRIC SVC -4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $1,161.26 -1419- Payments Current Period: June 2016 06/22/16 4:45 PM Page 7 Fund Summary Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $1,161.26 Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 $12,886.60 285 MOUND HRA Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC -4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $1,195.25 Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 $3,089.52 601 WATER FUND Cash Payment E 285-46388-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-16 $1,399.89 Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 $1,726.09 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 4-25-16 TO 5-25-1.6 $46.17 Invoice 504934782 6/13/2016 Transaction Date 6/16/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,785.14 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $888,215.08 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $12,886.60 285 MOUND HRA $1,399.89 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $2,279.00 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $3,089.52 601 WATER FUND $4,518.15 602 SEWER FUND $7,440.01 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $1,726.09 $921,554.34 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $921,554.34 Total $921,554.34 -1420- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES June 14, 2016 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, June 14, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Heidi Gesch, Kelli Gillispie, Ray Salazar, and Jennifer Peterson Members absent: None Others present: City Manager and Public Works Director Eric Hoversten, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, City Attorney Melissa Manderschied, Administrative Assistant Mary Mackres, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Catherine Pausche, City Engineer Dan Faulkner, Dede King, Max Teplitski, Nicole Brodzik, Paul Paine Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda Hoversten asked to amend the agenda with the addition of items 8.1, A & B regarding Chapter 6 of the Mound City Code and noted additional information has been provided for item 9 in the form of two emails received by City staff that should be included as pages 1379.1 & 2 and 1379.3 & 4. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda The Mayor discussed changing the process to approve the Consent Agenda items that will include an invitation for any person present to request an item be removed in order to allow them to give input. Hoversten asked that Item 46 be removed as Council Member Salazar was not in attendance at the May 24, 2016 regular meeting. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the consent agenda as amended. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $566,182.10 B. REMOVED 1421- Mound City Council Minutes — June 14, 2016 C. RESOLUTION NO. 16-67: RESOLUTION APPROVING CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER PIPE IN MOUND, MN E. RESOLUTION NO. 16-68: RESOLUTION APPROVING LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS FOR 2016 - 2017 F. RESOLUTION NO. 16-69: RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY TO PROVIDE PROPERTY ASSESSMENT SERVICES (A165534) G. RESOLUTION NO. 16-70: RESOLUTION APPOINTING ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD H. RESOLUTION NO. 16-71: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. 16-54 FOR THE 2016 SPIRIT OF THE LAKES FESTIVAL TO INCLUDE ALTERNATE RAIN DATE OF SUNDAY, JULY 17, 2016 FOR THE MINNESOTA WAKE SURFING CHAMPIONSHIP AT SURFSIDE PARK AND BEACH 4B. (Removed) Approve minutes: May 24, 2016 Regular Meeting MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the May 24, 2016 Regular Meeting minutes. The following voted in favor: Gesch, Gillispie, Wegscheid, Peterson. The following voted against: none. The following abstained: Salazar. Motion carried. 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None offered. 6. Consideration of a Public Lands Permit and Variance for 51XX Drummond Road Applicant: Paul Paine Requested Actions A. Approve Resolution approving Public Lands Permit for 51XX Drummond Road B. Approve Resolution approving Variance for 51XX Drummond Road (Planning Case No. 16-05) Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, addressed the Council regarding a Public Lands Permit application and a variance regarding the construction of a driveway with frontage of no less than 40 feet with access to an undeveloped lot. Smith added the lot meets the standards of the applicable district. Smith said the City Public Works Department offered two options to accommodate for the construction of the driveway. One option was to extend Drummond Road about 20 feet to the -1422- Mound City Council Minutes — June 14, 2016 east and the second was to modify the applicant's proposal so the driveway would be constructed in the southern half of the existing Drummond Road. Smith added that a spillway is present where the proposed driveway would be located that will need to be relocated. She added that public works uses the area for snow storage and the costs for the relocation would be paid by the applicant. Smith stated that the Planning Commission was supportive of both the Public Lands Permit and the variance and is supportive of the driveway in the southern half of Drummond as the preferred option. Smith added the end of 120 day variance is approaching and would need to be approved before June 23rd or there would need to be a discussion regarding an extension with the applicant. Mayor Wegscheid asked if the driveway is going to be built immediately or will the applicant wait for the house to be built on the lot? Smith responded that in the event the property is sold the driveway improvement should be in place before a sale. Gesch asked if it is true that staff doesn't see the need for any variances on the lot in the future. Smith responded said she didn't think a variance would be needed as the site is buildable and the slope on the lot does not meet the standards of a bluff, though the design of buildings and the site plan would need to take the slope on the lot into consideration. Paul Paine, 6525 County Road 26, Minnetrista, and owner of the Drummond property addressed the Council. Paine said he is not sure if he will build a house on the lot but will have the utilities in place before a house is built on the lot. Denise King, a Minnetrista resident and owner of the property abutting 51XX Drummond, said she recently bought the property and would like the opportunity to walk the area and see where the driveway is being proposed. King stated she didn't know of the variance until right before the meeting. King expressed concern about emergency vehicles using the road and is concerned about where parking will take place on Drummond. Paine agreed to a 30 -day extension to give King a little time to inspect the Drummond Road area. Motion by Wegscheid, seconded by Salazar to table Item 6 until the June 28, 2016 regular council meeting to allow King time to walk the property and review the proposed plans/application. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7. Dan Faulkner, City Engineer, presented an overview of City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (PCA) as part of City compliance with the federal Clean Water Act. Faulkner explained that the City must hold a public hearing to meet Federal requirements as well as meet six minimum control measures. Those measures include Public Education and Outreach, Public Participation and Involvement, Illicit Discharge and Elimination, Construction Site Storm Sewer Runoff, Post Construction storm -1423- Mound City Council Minutes — June 14, 2016 water management in new development and redevelopment and Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping. Faulkner stated the City is meeting requirements through inspection protocols, education and activities such as street sweeping. Faulkner suggested a separate web page to inform residents of further resources on the subject. El rooms Smith said the proposed amendments to Chapters 129 and 6 include language to allow brewpubs, taprooms, distilleries etc. in appropriate areas of the City. Smith explained that the proposed zoning would allow those activities in all districts except the 63 and linear districts. Smith stated these restrictions would help to minimize any negative impacts on the community as those districts are in and around residential areas. She added that the proposed zoning amendment would require brewpubs, taprooms, and distillery businesses to go through the Conditional Use Permitting process to ensure performance standards are being met (such as parking) and to address zoning regulations which are consistent with the proposed Chapter 6. Smith said the proposed amendments are intended to be consistent with State statute. Smith explained that the new activities listed in Chapter 6 Alcoholic Beverages are manufacturing uses with brewpubs also being a restaurant use. She stated that distilleries can operate cocktail rooms and taprooms can serve their products which are either sampled or offered for sale. Smith added that State statute no longer requires seating requirements for most liquor licenses or food and alcohol percentage of sales requirements as it had in the past. Smith added that State regulation of the alcohol production and service industry has undergone significant change in recent years. She explained this is why the City has proposed removing Class IV restaurants from the Zoning regulations and the seating and sales requirements in Chapter 6. Smith added that the City used a model ordinance from the League of Minnesota Cities as the template to repeal and replace the old Chapter 6 and modified it to suit the City's needs. Smith noted a table summarizing the different license types and requirements has been included as additional information. Smith said the City Code doesn't require a Public Hearing for a standard ordinance amendment but a Public Hearing is required for a Zoning Code amendment. Smith added that the Planning Commission has approved the proposed amended Zoning Ordinance. Wegscheid stated he would like to hold off on a decision on Chapter 6 as he would like more time to read through the amended ordinance again. Gesch asked about seating and whether the requirements for seating have changed in Statute recently. Pausche stated the only seating requirement remaining in the Statute and the proposed ordinance is in regards to the wine on -sale license which requires a minimum of 25 seats and the Sunday on -sale intoxicating liquor license which requires a minimum number of 30 seats. Pausche was unsure of when Statute changed regarding the number of seats. Mayor Wegscheid requested staff revisit the proposed language in the amendments as they relate to existing Conditional Use Permits to see if any CUPs need to be amended. -1424- Mound City Council Minutes — June 14, 2016 Peterson asked why there are still some areas in which there is a need for City approval such as Sunday sales for taprooms. Pausche responded that approval and hours of off -sale service are by Statute a City discretionary decision. The Council requested the Zoning and Chapter 6 amendments be brought to the Council in tandem for a decision after the procedures for the posting and publishing of the public hearing for the Zoning Ordinance has been followed. 8.1 (Added) Request for action on the following: a) An ordinance amending Chapter 6 of the Mound City Code as it relates to alcoholic beverages b) A resolution authorizing publication of Ordinance No. _-2016 by Title and Summary Pausche addressed the Council to request to amend the Sunday on -sales intoxicating liquor license hours of service from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. Pausche stated Statute now allows for intoxicating liquor sales to begin at 8:00 a.m. on Sunday. She clarified this is a request to amend the current Chapter 6 to make the change to 8:00 a.m. Peterson asked how will all liquor establishments in the City be informed of the change. Pausche stated packet information was sent to all liquor license holders in the City showing what is being proposed. 8.1a MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve the ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 06-2016: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 6 OF THE MOUND CITY CODE AS IT RELATES TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES 8.1 b MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gesch, to approve resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Q RESOLUTION NO. 16-72: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 06-2016 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY Gillispie recused herself due to a potential conflict of interest. Smith reported on the City observation of Main Street USA's compliance with the agreement made with the business at the last Council Meeting and stated that the owners of Main Street USA were notified of this meeting and update. Smith stated the owners of the business requested that this agenda item be tabled. Wegscheid said that the City has been trying to work with Main Street USA for many years and has tried to accommodate the needs of the business owners. Wegscheid said the owners are continually outside of the requirements listed in the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for vehicles -1425- Mound City Council Minutes — June 14, 2016 on the lot and there has not been a day after issuance of the new CUP that the business was within the agreed upon number of cars on the lot. Wegscheid added that the owners of Main Street USA have been very involved in the discussion of the CUP. Wegscheid stated that the owners had questioned the reports of the number of cars on the lot. Wegscheid added that the car counting which the City did was outside of business hours. He added that he is frustrated because of the amount of time which was spent to develop the new CUP and the owners can't seem to comply with it. Gesch also expressed her frustration as the allowable number of cars was discussed with the owners and it was made clear at the last Council meeting that they were to have no more than 25 cars on the lot. Wegscheid further added that he hates to be in the situation where the Council is forced to pull the CUP for the site. Salazar concurred with the discussion and he noted the strides which were made to make sure the owners of Main Street USA knew they were to have a maximum of 25 vehicles on the lot. MOTION by Wegscheid, seconded by Gesch, to direct staff to schedule a public hearing to discuss revocation of the CUP at Main Street Auto. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 10. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council Members Mayor Wegscheid noted there were items regarding Indian Knoll Manor coming up. Wegscheid said the Planning Commission minutes and packet will be available for the Council to review in advance of the next packet to allow for more time. Wegscheid relayed facts regarding the Mound Fire Department (MFD) Fish Fry held on June 6th: The MFD served 2,571 dinners and 3,723 advance tickets were sold by the firemen going door to door. He added that a total of 4,115 total ticket sales were made. The MFD raised $42,931 through ticket sales. Carbone's donated $6,000 and helped with the procurement of the fish. Total revenue was $71,307 with expenses of $39,478 leaving a net profit of $31,829. The Mayor added that the Mound Fire Department Auxiliary also donated $1,615 to the MFD for the purchase of a specialized deck nozzle for the MFD fire boat. Hoversten added the Planning Commission packet for Indian Knoll Manor cannot be discussed amongst council members in order to comply with open meeting law and he informed council members to direct their questions about the project to staff. Hoversten said he will not schedule the Trident Assisted Living Project discussion on the same Council Meeting as the Indian Knoll Manor discussion due to the complexity of both projects. Hoversten added that staff requests a Council Workshop to discuss and further develop the administrative citation section of city ordinance and asked the Council to check their availability on July 26th from 6-6:45 p.m, with the HRA and regular Council Meeting to follow. Hoversten stated that Harbor Wine and Spirits will be tapping the 2016 version of Surfside Pale Ale on June 30t6 with the Mayor officiating the event followed by continued festivities at Dakota Junction. Music in the Park will also be held on the 30th in the Harbor District. -1426- Mound City Council Minutes —June 14, 2016 Hoversten stated that the Orono Police Department announced the Night to Unite event will be held on August 2nd Hoversten will provide updates on current development proposals and the City's current and future capital investment proposals at a Westonka Community and Commerce event at 6:00 p.m. on June 16th which is being held at Surfside Bar & Grill. Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok will also speak at the event. B. Reports: Fire Department - May 2016 Finance Department - April 2016 C. Minutes: Advisory Planning Commission: May 3, 2016 D. Correspondence: 11. Adjourn MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Gillispie, to adjourn at 8:22 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1427- Mayor Mark Wegscheid MEMORANDUM Date: June 23, 2016 To: Mayor and Council Members From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Subject: Proposed Policy ADMIN -004 Tax Increment Financing Tax Increment Financing, or'TIF', has been around for 40 years and is an economic development tool that helps cities preserve and grow their local economies, which in turn contributes to the economic health and vitality of the state. The primary emphasis on determining whether TIF is needed to spur development is the "but -for" test, which says the project develops a substandard or blighted area on sites which would not otherwise be developed "but/for" the use of TIF. Redevelopment TIF districts differ from housing TIF districts. There is less regulation involved with a housing TIF district, which exists to encourage development of affordable housing. To qualify for a housing TIF district, at least 20% of the units must be occupied by individuals with 50% of median income, or 40% of the units occupied by individuals with 60% of median income. The City of Mound has three redevelopment TIF districts, including TIF 1-1 Commerce Place, which was decertified in 2009 after 24 years and repayment of the debt. TIF 1-2 Metroplains was created to develop Mound Market Place and Village by the Bay which will decertify in 2026. TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissance was created to develop Lost Lake and the Harbor District and decertifies in 2031. The City uses the tax increment to repay debt service on bonds that were issued for these developments. When the TIF district decertifies, the debt is satisfied and the tax capacity of the City increases. Although it is impossible to anticipate all of the scenarios and projects that will result in a request for a subsidy, recent trends suggest rental housing is leading the economic recovery and the market study completed in 2013 suggested Mound has limited capacity to support commercial and industrial development. Mound needs to be positioned to promote and support development and ensure resources are being spent on projects that bring long-term benefits to the community, not just in the way of increased tax capacity, but also in the services and amenities businesses and residents desire. The HRA discussed and recommended approval of the attached ADMIN -004 TIF Policy at the June 14th regular meeting, to help guide the decision making process on whether or not to grant TIF or some other form of public subsidy. Staff recommends approval as well. .__.EI7Y OF IhOVND^. ADMIN POLICY -TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Original Adoption: 06/28/2016 Reviewed/Updated: TBD Reference No. ADMIN -004 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This policy is intended for situations where the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound ("HRA") has been asked to provide Tax Increment Financing ("TIF") or other public subsidy for a proposed development project in the community. The City of Mound is granted the power to utilize TIF by the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act, as amended. It is the intent of the City to provide the minimum amount of TIF at the shortest term required for the project to proceed. The City reserves the right to approve or reject projects on a case by case basis, taking into consideration established policies, project criteria, and demand on city services in relation to the potential benefits from the project. Meeting policy criteria does not guarantee the award of TIF to the project. Approval or denial of one project is not intended to set precedent for approval or denial of another project. AUTHORITY Minnesota State Statutes 469-174 through 469-1799 govern the use of TIF and supersede any issues that conflict with this Policy. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The HRA will consider the following list of economic development goals and objectives when evaluating requests for TIF or other public subsidy for a potential development or redevelopment project in Mound: 1. The project must be consistent with community values and vision as described in the Mound Comprehensive Plan and demonstrate the proper balance of type of use supported by market studies and/or other economic indicators. 2. The project must contribute to the economic vitality of the community, provide employment opportunities and ultimately expand the tax base. 3. The project will attract or retain local jobs and/or increase the number and diversity of jobs that offer stable employment and/or attractive wages and benefits through -1429- a. Diversification of the loca I economy b. Providing a high number of full time permanent jobs at good wages c. Providing jobs to persons who are currently unemployed or underemployed 4. The project promotes development of mixed-use areas with housing, retail, office, entertainment and institutional uses adding significantly to the City's commercial and industrial tax base. Project area should encompass "natural' boundaries to ensure proper aesthetics and avoidance of remnant properties. 5. The project provides significant rehabilitation of an existing apartment complex or significant rehabilitation and/or expansion of an existing office or commercial facility. 6. The project encourages a mixture of housing types for all stages of life and income levels, including affordable housing units, and adds to and/or complements the existing housing stock with regard to unit mix and sizes. 7. The project develops a substandard or blighted area of Mound on sites which would not otherwise be developed but/for the use of TIF. (Statutory Reference). TIF is used to offset increased costs of redevelopment (i.e. contaminated site clean-up) over and above the costs normally incurred in development. 8. The project provides significant improvement to surrounding land uses, the neighborhood, and/or the City while reflecting Mound's existing land use patterns including adding needed road, access and multi -modal transportation improvements. 9. The design of the project protects any significant natural, cultural, historic and/or archaeological features and contributes to the implementation of other public policies, as adopted by the city from time to time, such as the promotion of quality historical, cultural or architectural design, enhancement of natural features, including but not limited to, water quality improvements, innovative storm water strategies, energy conservation, multi -modal transportation, and decreasing capital and/or operating costs of local government. For these reasons, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound will only consider a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) request or request for other public subsidy that meets a substantial number of the established economic development goals and objectives as mentioned above, as determined by the HRA, and fully demonstrates long-term benefits to the community. -1430- ADMIN -004 TIF Policy Application 2415 Wilshire Boulevard • Mound, MN 55364 • Phone (952) 472-0604 • Fax (952) 472-0620 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC FINANCING Appilcant Information 1. Applicant Name: (Name should be the officially registered name of the business entity.) Telephone: Email Address: 2. Name of Person Completing the application: Address: Telephone: Email Address: 3. Names and Addresses of Architect, Engineer, and General Contractor for this project: Attorney Name: Address: Telephone: _ Architect Name: Address: Telephone: Engineer Name: Address: Telephone: _ General Contractor Name: Address: Telephone: Email Address: Email Address: Email Address: Email Address: 4. If the applicant is a corporation, please name officers, directors, or stockholders holding more that 5% of the stock of the corporation. If the corporation is not formed, provide as much information as possible concerning potential officers, directors, or stockholders, either in the space below or in a separate exhibit: -1431- ADMIN-004TIF Policy Application 4a. If the applicant is a general partnership, name of the general partners and if a limited partnership, state the general partners and limited partners with more than 5% interest in the limited partnership. If the partnership is not formed, provide as much information as possible concerning potential officers, directors or stockholders, either in the space below or in a separate exhibit. 4b. Has the applicant ever been in bankruptcy? If yes, please describe the circumstances. Yes (please Explain): No: 4c. Has the applicant ever been convicted of a felony? Is yes, please describe the circumstances. Yes (please Explain): Im 4d. Has the applicant ever defaulted on any bond or mortgage commitment? Yes (please Explain): IM Project Information 1. PID#'s, legal description, address, and size of project site: PID#: Legal Size of Project Size (Acres): -1432- 2. Current ownership of the ADMIN -004 TIF Policy Application 3. Do you have current control of the site: Yes: No: 4. Project description. 5. If property is to be subdivided or replatted, please describe. 6. Enter estimated project costs in the space below or in a separate exhibit: (Please enclose detailed sources and uses and 15 -year operating Pro Forma). a. Land Acquisition: b. Surveys: c. Demolition: d. Environmental/ Soil Corrections: e. Architectural & Engineering Fees: f. Legal Fees/ Other Consulting Fees: g. FF&E: h. Financing Costs: i. Construction Interest: j. Title Insurance: k. Mortgage Registration: 1. Bank/ Borrower Legal: m. Recording/ Closing: n. Construction Loan Fees: o. Public Improvements: p. Site Development: q. Building(s): -1433- ADM IN-004TIF Policy Application Shell (if applicable) Tenant Improvements (if applicable) r. S/ W Connection Charges: S. Permitting: t. MCES SPC: u. Park Dedication: v. Appraisal: w. Property Taxes: x. Contingencies (construction): y. Contingencies (soft): z. Other: TOTAL $ 7. Source of Financing a. Equity: $ b. Bank Financing: c. Public Assistance: (TIF or Tax Abatement) d. Other governmental loans/grants: e. Deferred Developer Fees: f. Other: TOTAL $ Terms of Financing (years): Rate of Financing: Cap Rate: 8. Project Construction Schedule: a. Construction Start Date: b. Construction Completion Date: c. If Phased Project: January 2, (year) % Completed . January 2, (vear) % Completed _ -1434- ADMIN-004TIF Policy Application 9. Total Estimated Market Value of Project upon completion 10. Please indicate how the project meets the economic development goals and objectives as stated in Mound TIF Policy (ADMIN -004), either in the space below or in a separate exhibit. 11. Please explain how the proposed project impacts public services, adjacent roadways and/or contributes to or alleviates the need for additional public parking. 12. Will any public official of the City, either directly or indirectly, benefit from the issuance of public assistance within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.311 or 471.87? If yes, please explain the circumstances. Circle One: Yes / No If 'Yes', please explain: Public Assistance Request 1. Type and amount of assistance and term. Type: If TIF, is project within an established TIF District? Circle One: Yes / No Amount: Term (years): -1435- ADMIN-004TIF Policy Application 2. Describe the purpose for which Public Assistance (TIF or Tax Abatement) is required, either in the space below or in a separate exhibit. 3. Please submit an itemized list of project costs for which TIF assistance is being requested, either in the space below or a separate exhibit. Note: Assistance for TIF is required to meet the uses identified by statute including, but not limited to the following: • Public improvements • Land acquisition and land write down • Loans • Site preparation and improvement • Demolition • Legal, administration and engineering 4. State specific reasons why, "but for' the use of public assistance, this project would not be possible. APPllcatlon Process 1. The following documents must accompany the Application: A. A detailed sources & uses statement and 15 -year project Pro Forma B. Parcel Map depicting the proposed redevelopment area C. if housing, detailed breakdown of units by unit type, sq/ft, base room rent and service cost D. Site plans and floors plans (as available) 1436- ADMIN-004TIF Policy Application E. Significant additional information may be requested at any time by the City/HRA and may be in addition to the materials outlined in this application. The Applicant shall be required to submit any and all information as requested by the City/HRA. 2. At the time of acceptance by staff of the Public Financing Application, the applicant shall deposit $10,000 with the City/HRA to cover attorney and consultant costs incurred if the project is located in an existing TIF district or if a public subsidy other than TIF is being requested, or $25,000 if the project is not located within an existing TIF district. Funds will also cover the drafting and negotiating of a development agreement and conducting any fiscal analysis that may be required to meet the requirements of utilizing any public financing. If additional expenses are incurred beyond the initial deposit, prior to the execution of a development agreement, the City/HRA shall notify the applicant in writing and the applicant will be required to deposit additional funds upon notice. 3. The Applicant shall hold the City/HRA, its officers, consultants, attorneys, and agents harmless from any and all claims arising from or in connection with the Project or Public Assistance Application, including but not limited to, any legal or actual violations of any State or Federal securities laws. 4. The Applicant recognizes and agrees that the City/HRA reserves the right to deny any application for Public Assistance at any stage of the proceedings prior to adopting the resolution approving the public assistance, that the Applicant is not entitled to rely on any preliminary actions by the City/HRA prior to the final resolution, and that all expenditures, obligations, costs, fees, or liabilities incurred by the Applicant in connection with the Project are incurred by the Applicant at its sole risk and expense and not in reliance on any actions of the City/HRA. The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of the Applicant, hereby certifies that the foregoing information is true, correct, and complete as of the date hereof and agrees that the Applicant shall be bound by the terms and provisions herein. NAME OF APPLICANT: NAME OF ORGANIZATION: APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE CITY RECEIPT OF APPLICATION DATE APPLICATION FEE PAID ESCROW ACCOUNT: -1437- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 (952)472-0604 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith Date: June 22, 2016 Re: June 28, 2016 City Council Consent Agenda Item - 2016 Dog Days Special Event Overview. Karen King, on behalf of Westonka Community & Commerce (WCC), has submitted a Public Gathering Permit application for the 2016 Dog Days annual event to be held on Auditors Road and surrounding vicinity on Saturday, August 6, 2016 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Details about the upcoming event are outlined in the permit application and supporting materials that were submitted by the applicant. Some highlights about the event are summarized below: • Staffs understanding is that the 2016 Dog Days event will be similar to past years and includes the Splash for Cash" competition that was added in 2015. • Expected attendance is 300+ people. • Estimated cars at the event are 200-300 vehicles. Staff anticipates parking will take place in the Transit District (surface and parking deck). Event attendees may also walk or bike to the event. • One (1) portable restroom is being provided for the event. Public restrooms are available in the Transit District next to the Dakota Regional Trail. • Auditors Road will be barricaded for the event. Comments. • Reduced fees of $150.00 for the Public Gathering Permit and $50.00 for the Musical Concert Permit are recommended because Dog Days is a community event that serves a public purpose and benefits Mound. • Staff notified Mound Staff and involved agencies about the upcoming event. Applicant is responsible for contacting the Orono Police Department, the Mound Fire Department, and the Public Works and Parks Departments regarding the event, including coordination of activities and personnel/equipment needs; also, any involved agencies (i.e., Hennepin County Transportation, Hennepin County Environmental Health, the Three Rivers Park District, etc.). • A temporary sign permit was also submitted but is eligible for administrative approval and issuance. 0 Open -sided tents will be used at the event. No heaters will be used in the tents. CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT AND MUSICAL CONCERT PERMIT FOR 2016 DOG DAYS EVENT WITH REDUCED FEES DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF GATHERING WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, the City Council of the City of Mound adopted Resolution 15-146 to establish its fee schedule for 2016 ("Fee Schedule"); and WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule set a Public Gathering Permit fee range from $300-600 per day with the actual amount to be determined by the City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of the permit application stating the specific use and requirements of the City for the proposed public gathering; and WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule set the Musical Concert Permit fee at $100 per day; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of City Code of Ordinances, Section 50-20, Westonka Community & Commerce submitted a public gathering permit application for the 2016 Dog Days event to be held on Saturday, August 6, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Auditors Road and in the surrounding vicinity; and WHEREAS, the City Council, upon recommendation of the City Manager and City Staff, reviewed the application; and WHEREAS, City Staff has reviewed said application and has recommended reasonable conditions to protect the public's investment in its public parks and commons areas as set forth in a staff memo to the City Council dated June 22, 2016 ("Conditions"); and WHEREAS, the City Manager and City Staff desire to waive a portion of said fees and to charge a reduced fee of $150 for the Public Gathering Permit and a reduced Musical Concert Permit Fee of $50 because it is a public celebration that benefits the community as a whole, it requires an extremely limited amount of city expenditures, and the primary objective of the event is not to benefit a private interest but rather to showcase the economic, recreational, and residential opportunities and amenities located within the City of Mound as a whole and within the geographic area of the proposed public gathering. -1439- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound as follows: 1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Resolution. 2. A reduced fee of $150 for the Public Gathering Permit and reduced fee of $50 for the Musical Concert Permit is in the public interest due to the overwhelming public benefits and extremely limited demands on city resources arising from the 2016 Dog Days event. I The Public Gathering Permit and Musical Concert Permit for the 2016 Dog Days event are hereby approved with Conditions. Passed by the City Council this 28th day of June Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1440- Mayor Mark Wegscheid CITY OF MOUND (• (�,t 1(` 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD �- �-, MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 �1 PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT Use of a public park or commons by any group consisting of 15 or more individuals. Use is not to interfere with traffic and general use of the park or commons or to be beyond the ability of the police in maintaining order. NO LIQUOR OR BEER MAY BE USED IN ANY OF THE CITY PARKS OR BUILDINGS. Group is to remove all litter and trash and provide a deposit to insure cleaning up of the park area. PERMIT FEE: $300/DAY TO $600/DAY* DAMAGE DEPOSIT: $500 TO $1000/DAY* *Permit fee and damage deposit amount to be determined by City Manager and City Staff upon receipt of application- stating specific use and requirements. Date(s) of Use { (may( { l 06 (O Area to be Used Time Frame - l � 0'0 '41m — 1 '00 Intended Use Expected Attendance X Organization Representative's Name J Address J�I Telephone No. Drivers License -1441- City Clerk Police Dept, Park Dept. Fire Dent. 06-22-16;09:05 ;From:EdwardJones To:9524720620 ;18664447089 # 2/ 2 CITY OF MOUND 2415 WILSHIRE BLVD. MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 MUSICICAL CONCERT HERMIT APPLICATION (including, but not Ilmited to, live music, music provided by a disc Jockey, and/or any type of amplified 'z/& (o/ty� TION OF MUSICAL CONCERT: TYPE OF MUSICICAL CONCERT: ( J y t i5ci5 �1 TIME PERIOD OF MUSICAL CONCERT f'. Q?) (HOURS PERMITTED: Mon - Sun: 7:00 am -10:00 pm) REQUESTED EXTENSION OF HOURS: (Council approval must be reereeived to conduct a musical concert after 10:00 pm) APPLICANT. Y ll/I CONTACT: ADDRESS: o-? ADDRESS: AOA P14ONE #: �, �5 Fwm, +Aplicant's PHHONE #: Signature -1442- JUN t 6 2016 Westonka Community & Commerce will be hosting the annual Dog Days Westonka on Saturday, August 6, 2016 from 9:oo AM to i:oo PM. This event will be held at the Mound Harbor District along the harbor and greenway space. Donations will go to WeCAN and the Westonka Food Shelf. Join fellow pet enthusiasts for a day filled with a pet parade, cutest puppy contest, agility drills, dog demonstrations, education and a non- denominational animal blessing. The expo includes a wide array of pet products and services including pet adoptions, nail trimming, tag engraving, Smooch Your Pooch photo booth, dog wash, photographers, giveaways and more We will have Hennepin County Sheriffs Department police dog demonstration and the agility course. New this year will be Ryan Anderson, a Minnesota Musher. He won the Can -Am Crown, the UP -too, the Hudson Bay Quest race and the John -1443- Beargrease Sled Dog Marathon. He will be speaking about his travels and answering questions. The American Legion Post 398 will host the food station serving up hot dogs, chips and sodas. They hold their own Hennepin County food permits. For the second year "Splash for Cash" will return. This is a Big Air and Dock Jumping Dog Competition. Brooks Chandler, Canvasback Inc. gill be running the competition. She has already been in touch with the Hennepin County Water Patrol. They will issue a permit once our permits are in motion. This will take place at the dock on the south end of the Expo. See attached description from last year; event will mainly run the same. She is updating the marketing piece and forms. We will be ordering the yard signs and banners and will put in place after Spirit of the Lakes has completed. Again, this is a community event that will bring in pets and their owners from the surrounding Westonka area. This is a fund event for everyone. We are looking forward to another successful year of Dog Days Westonka. � fp commun't"tilri ce MINNETRISTA . MDUNO • WARRE < SPRING PARK -1444- 1 a 00oQYs ce FARMERS MARKET +VENDOR PARKING PARKING RAMP 4D 18-]®®F51®1[2]® A0, Tomo oLL � cm i� m 's iv a0 a m" D m a p nA mx Com. J m < p 4— BIFFY O RESTROOMS Main Tent audio Tabte n3 z xz ;, Nm z > r DOG COOL TRUE VALUE HYDRATION STATION �0PWR iy mp O� cr v< ys �y2 =y me 03 PWR �o - �� va ma op ox ➢ a -i o Do ON ,�, i➢ 00 D io Z y� oc op o ➢A < > no 00 u ANDREW SISTERS TRAIL PETWAST STATIO Sn event by u(Offolt�id =` . ioIRR ur q&ionlmerce i DAKOTA TRAIL N FIELD SIDE SD Sx On p➢ T v i ]ODSHELF ( DOG ATIONS 1 POOL Ic ILJ L �> - rm C � n D m C � i� n y m U ADA BIFFY ANKA NIMALOHOSP ®®®®®I F.@' C-5EVERi =i 03 =ii O� PWR p c10 ` n ➢nxNo s 2 ' v OBSERVATION x ny LEGION i AREA o t HOTDOG AwN STAND Ale --1 _ LAKESIDE eonvs DECK gJF Executive Summary TO: FROM: DATE: REQUEST ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director June 23, 2016 Sign variation/modification for Mount Olive Lutheran Church R-1 Residential Low Density Residential Summary. At its June 28th meeting, the City Council will consider request from Gene Snyder, submitted on April 29th, on behalf of Mount Olive Lutheran Church, for a sign variation/modification as provided by City Code 119. 2 (e) to install a 24 square foot, double - sided, freestanding sign, to include a 12 SF LED reader board on their property at 5218 Bartlett Boulevard. Project details are outlined in Planning Report dated June 2, 2016, which is included as an attachment. Review Procedure. City Code Sec. 119-2 (2) allows a variation/modification to the City's sign regulations where it can be shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, that strict compliance of the regulations would cause a hardship. A variation/modification may be granted only if the variation/modification does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of Chapter 119 (Signs). Requests for a sign variation/modification requires review by the Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council. Planning Commission Meeting Overview and Recommendation. The sign request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 7th meeting. Staff provided a summary of the proposed sign including its proposed location near the intersection of Wilshire Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard. The applicant was present at the meeting. No other persons attended the June 7th meeting for this request. Based on its review, the Planning Commission recommend approval of the sign variation/modification request for the property at 5218 Bartlett Boulevard to allow a changeable message board, not to exceed 18 square feet, on the proposed new sign, as recommended by Staff. A draft resolution, based on the Planning Commission's recommendation has been included for Council consideration. Additional Information • Neighboring property owners of the subject site in the vicinity of the proposed sign, per Hennepin County tax records, were notified by letter on June 22, 2016, to inform them of the sign permit request and that it was being included on the Tuesday, June 28, 2016 City Council consent agenda. • The sign variation/modification request was submitted on April 29, 2016. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule for land use applications and was determined to be April 30, 2016. The 60 -day deadline per Minnesota Statutes 15.99 is on or before June 28, 2016 unless the City executes an extension. Council members and the applicant are advised that the City will be executing an extension, as provided by Minnesota Statutes 15.99 in advance of June 28, 2016. -1449- RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SIGN VARIATION/MODIFICATION FOR 5218 BARTLETT BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the applicant, Gene Snyder, on behalf of Mount Olive Church, submitted a sign permit application and sign variation/modification request to allow installation of a 24 square foot freestanding sign to include a 12 square foot changeable message LED reader board at the corner of Wilshire Boulevard and Bartlett Boulevard, on its property at 5218 Bartlett Boulevard; and WHEREAS, City Code Sec. 119-2 (2) allows a variation/modification to the City's sign regulations where it can be shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, that strict compliance of the regulations would cause a hardship. A variation/modification may be granted only if the variation/modification does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of Chapter 119 (Signs). A request for a sign variation/modification requires review by the Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-1 and churches are allowed by conditional use in the R-1 District. The proposed sign request does not intensify the use of the property therefore a CUP amendment is not required; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 119-5 (1), one signor bulletin board, per street frontage, for each permitted or conditional use is allowed up to 48 square feet and 10 feet in height. A 10 -foot setback is required. Changeable signs, up to 18 square feet, are allowed up to 18 square feet in the commercial districts but are not referenced in the residential district; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Report dated June 2, 2016, and the submitted request and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the sign variation/modification subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the sign modification/variation was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 7, 2016 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend Council approval of the sign variation/modification; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the sign variation/modification request at its June 28, 2016 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and -1450- WHEREAS, the City Council's action on the sign variation/modification meets the City's decision requirements contained in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The proposed size and height of the proposed sign is consistent with the applicable requirements in the sign regulations. The LED reader board size is consistent with the applicable provisions for the commercial district. 2. Use of a changeable message to provide time, temperature and other related public service information is a reasonable use for a community church. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the sign variation/modification for the property at 5218 Bartlett Boulevard with the following conditions: As provided by City Code Sec. 119-4 (d), the City reserves the right to specify the hours during which the sign may be kept lit to prevent the creation of a nuisance. 2. The illuminated sign shall have a shielded light source and concealed wiring. 3. Lighting/glare shall meet the provisions included in the City Code. 4. Permits for installation of the wall sign and lighting shall be obtained. Applicant shall be required to contact MnSpect, the City's building official, to determine what permits are required to undertake the proposed sign/lighting installation. 5. No signage shall be installed until all permits have been issued. The sign variation/modification is hereby approved for the following legally described property: (-to be inserted-) Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of June, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid -1451- MINUTES JUNE 7, 2016 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners David Goode, Bill Stone, Pete Wiechert, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Members absent: Jason Baker, Doug Gawtry, and Jeffrey Bergquist. Stafl present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Gerald Vandam, 5816 Grandview Bivd; Blake 2645 Halstead La; Chris Rydrych, 5510 Spruce Rd; Chris Carlson, 5547! Aspen Rd; Aubrie Gould, Aeon; Ellen Gomoll, 5508 Breezy Rd, Terry Sti Cheri Erickson; Sherrie Pugh, 5567 Spruce Rd; Pat & Dianne Brickley, 5 Snyder, 4749 S Lake Sarah Dr, Independence; Roger Fink, Trident Deve APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Goode, second by Stone, unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS Sign Variation/Modificz 5218 Bartlett Boulevarc Applicant: Mount Olive Smith introduced the request t Boulevards. Residential R4dis as a reasonable request. The a of illumination. This is not a va the site. Design is;still a little in It is a reasonable use for a neigl public information. The appiica background). Neighborsin:the the Hopkins, Aeon; Kathy Bergquist, ipruce Rd; Wayde Fieener, 6020 irkey, 5508 Breezy Rd; Jim Turner; 514 Spruce Rd; Millie & Gene MOTION carried an electronic,sign at the corner of Bartlett and Wilshire as not include language to allow electronic signage. Staff sees this neighboring property owners can be lessened by limiting hours ut a variation recognizing what the unique circumstances are on meets the requirements for size and changeable message board. )d church to be able to utilize available technology to provide ,med that it is a low profile reader board (red lettering on black area were notified of the meeting. MOTION by Goode, second by'Smieja, to recommend approval subject to conditions and findings of fact as established by staff. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Penner, second by Goode, to adjourn at 11:15 p.m. MOTION passed unanimously. -1452- TO: FROM: DATE: REQUEST ZONING: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director June 2, 2016 Sign variance/modification for Mount Olive Lutheran Church R-1 Residential Low Density Residential Summary. The Planning Commission will review a request from Gene Snyder, submitted on April 29th, on behalf of Mount Mount Olive Lutheran Church, for a sign variation/modification as provided by City Code 119. 2 (e) to install a 24 square foot, double -sided, freestanding sign, to include a 12 SF LED reader board on their property at 5218 Bartlett Boulevard. Review Procedure. City Code Sec. 119-2 (2) allows a variation/modification to the City's sign regulations where it can be shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, that strict compliance of the regulations would cause a hardship. A variation/modification may be granted only if the variation/modification does not adversely affects the spirit or intent of Chapter 119 (Signs). Requests for a sign variation/modification requires review by the Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council. Discussion. ® The subject property includes frontage on the north side of Bartlett Boulevard and on the west side Wilshire Boulevard. o Churches are allowed by conditional use in the R-1 District. Staff's review is that the proposed sign request does not intensify the use of the property therefore a CUP amendment is not required. According to City Code Sec.119-5 (1), one sign or bulletin board, per street frontage, for each permitted or conditional use is allowed up to 48 square feet and 10 feet in height. A 10 -foot setback is required. Changeable signs, up to 18 square feet, are allowed up to 18 square feet in the commercial districts but are not referenced in the residential district. -1453- ® The proposed sign size and height is consistent with the applicable code regulations and is intended to be placed in a location consistent with the applicable regulations related to the setback and sight triangle. o Adjacent Uses. The property to the east is the ballfields/greenspace for Shirley Hllls Elementary School. The properties on the south side of Bartlett Boulevard are residential. The property on the west side is a City -owned lot. A preliminary site plan was submitted and shows the approximate location of the proposed new illuminated freestanding sign. The applicant will need to work with Staff related to the road ROW and applicable setback(s) requirement. Planning Commission members are advised that the site plan also shows proposed location (Option 2) for some off street parking informational signage. These signs are conforming based on Staff review. • The City's regulations to allow for a variation/modification approval were incorporated into the City Code in October 2010. Previously, the code required variance approval. • Neighboring property owners of the subject site in the vicinity of the proposed sign, per Hennepin County tax records, were notified by letter on June 1, 2016 to inform them of the sign permit request and the Tuesday, lune 7, 2016 Planning Commission meeting. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the sign permit application and request for sign variation/modification for the property at 5218 Bartlett Boulevard to allow a changeable message board, not to exceed 18 square feet, on the proposed new sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. As provided by City Code Sec. 119-4 (d), the City reserves the right to specify the hours during which the sign may be kept lit to prevent the creation of a nuisance. 2. The illuminated sign shall have a shielded light source and concealed wiring. 3. Lighting/glare shall meet the provisions included in the City Code. 4. Permits for installation of the wall sign and lighting shall be obtained. Applicant shall be required to contact MnSpect, the City's building official, to determine what permits are required to undertake the proposed sign/lighting installation. 5. No signage shall be installed until all permits have been issued. In recommending approval, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed size and height of the proposed sign is consistent with the applicable requirements in the sign regulations. The LED reader board size is consistent with the applicable provisions for the commercial district. -1454- Use of a changeable message to provide time, temperature and other related public service information is a reasonable use for a community church. City Council Review. Required. At this time, possible dates for City Council consideration of the sign variation/modification request are Tuesday, June 14, 2016 or Tuesday, lune 28, 2016. -1455- PERMANENT SIGN PERMIT 2415Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55384 APPLICATION Phone 052-472A600 Fa"52472-0820 s Note: Any information supplied on this form will be considered public according to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. NOTE: This is a zoning permit only. Contact MNSPECT (952-442-7520) for bldg/elect requirements. SITE Property Address 5218 Bartlett Blvd (eft co(�oE Zone 55364 Business Name Mt Olive Lutheran Church, LCMS Phone 952-472-2756 APPLICANT Name Gene Snyder (Church Volunteer) Email mgsnyder@usfamily.net Phone 612-817-5577 Fax Other OWNER Name Mt Olive Lutheran Church, LCMS /Pastor Mike Michalk Phone 952-472-2756 Fax Other Cell 952-388-3858 SIGN Company Name Not yet determined / in process of getting 3rd quote CONTRACTOR Address sign would be similar to paperwork submitted. When contractor chosen and linaldesign determined will submit or Ina approva . Contact Person Email Phone Fax Other NUMBER OF SIGNS APPLYING FOR: 1 (d more than one wall sign is being requested, see Side 2) SIZE OF SIGN REQUESTED: feet high x feet wide = square feet FREE STANDING SIGN height from ground level to top of sign feet WALL SIGN: Wali area = feet high x feet wide = square feet Number of existing wall signs: List square footage of each existing sign: Total square feet of all existing wall signs: square feet Percentage of wall area covered by signs: square feet DESCRIBE SIGN (mes age, materials, illumination_ etc.): 5:.� h`�ACFi C.D tNhC? APPLICANT'S 5 RE DATE (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: Revised 2013 -1456- oF -1457- (I " �:3 -1458- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM. Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: June 23, 2016 SUBJECT: Public Lands Permit /Variance Requests (PC Case No. 16-09) LOCATION: 51XX Drummond Road PID NO: 25-117-24-12-0109 APPLICANT: Paul Paine OWNERS: Paul and Chareese Paine COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: low Density Residential ZONING: R -1A Single Family Residential Summary. At its June 14th meeting, the City Council considered the public lands permit and variance applications submitted by Paul Paine who is proposing to construct a new single- family dwelling on a vacant lot located at the terminus of Drummond Road, a portion of which is unimproved in this area. The project would also involve construction of a driveway across the southern portion of the unimproved ROW and other related work or improvements, including but not limited to, utility services. Variance approval is required as the subject lot lacks the minimum required frontage on an improved public road. The City Council tabled action on the applications so as to allow time for a neighboring property owner, who recently purchased the property and received the meeting notice just a few days prior to the June 14th meeting, to learn more about the proposed project and to visit the property. At the meeting, Mr. Paine also agreed to grant the City a 30 -day extension beyond the current deadline of June 23, 2016 for action on the variance request. Staff spoke with Mr. Paine on June 23rd, who confirmed that he met with the neighbor as requested to explain the proposed project. Staff contacted the neighbor on June 22nd and June 23rd by telephone to inquire if there were any questions following the meeting and also to advise that the applications were being included on the consent agenda for the June 28th City Council meeting. -1459- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A PUBLIC LANDS PERMIT FOR PROPERTY AT 51XX DRUMMOND ROAD PID NO. 25-117-24-12-0109 WHEREAS, the applicant, Paul Paine, is requesting a Public Lands Permit to undertake improvements associated with the construction of a driveway and utilities installation in unimproved Drummond Road for a future new house construction project at 51XX Drummond Road; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 62-11, requires City Council approval by a majority vote for construction of any kind on any public way, park or commons, or the alteration of the natural contour of any public way, park or commons; and WHEREAS, details regarding the request are contained in the Planning Report No. 16-05 dated April 28, 2016, which included Staff's recommendation for approval and two (2) alternatives for providing access (Option A and Option B), subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered this request at their meeting on Tuesday, May 3, 2016 along with a variance application for lack of required improved frontage. The applicant was agreeable to both Option A and Option B and working with the Public Works Department to determine the best alternative. The Planning Commission voted to recommended approval of the Public Lands Permit as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, following the Planning Commission meeting, it was determined by the Public Works Department that the preferred alternative was Option A due to site conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Public Lands Permit application at its June 14, 2016 meeting and tabled the application to the June 28, 2016 meeting to allow for additional time for an interested party to learn more about the submitted application; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the application at its June 28, 2016 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the Public Lands Permit application, the City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. Construction of driveway access and utility improvements to accommodate the construction of a new, single-family home is viewed as favorable. 2. The City's rights related to the platted street can be maintained and continued. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the Public Lands Permit for the property at 51XX Drummond Road with the following conditions: The plan be modified so all improvements are located in the south one-half of Drummond Road (Option A). All costs with the involved project, including the relocation of the spillway and all related improvements shall be paid by the applicant. The City shall determine the responsible party to relocate the spillway. The driveway shall be constructed to City standards and an agreement, in recordable form, related to truck traffic for snow removal over the spilhAink, Ali" be required. The agreement is required to be in recordable form and shall be rec14&0-- 2. Prior to commencing any site or land alteration activities, final construction plans for the work to be undertaken in the Drummond Road ROW, including, but not limited to, driveway construction and utilities installation, shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Public Works and Engineering Departments; also, the spillway relocation. Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all required permitting, including, but not limited to, a street opening permit, grading permit, utility permit, etc.; also, required agency permits. 3. A hold harmless/encroachment agreement, to be prepared by the City Attorney, which could include the submittal of financial security, in a form acceptable to the City, to undertake work on public property and to ensure that the improvements are installed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director, or designee, may be required. At this time it is unknown whether an agreement is needed or whether there are other property owners that may need to be party to such an agreement and will be determined by Staff in cooperation with the City Attorney. 4. Variance approval for the subject property. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of June, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk -1461- Mayor Mark Wegscheid CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - PLANNING CASE • PID NO0. WHEREAS, the applicant, Paul Paine, is proposing to construct a new single-family dwelling on a vacant lot located at the terminus of Drummond Road, a portion of which is unimproved in this area. The project would also involve construction of a driveway across the southern portion of the unimproved ROW and other related work or improvements, including but not limited to, utility services; and WHEREAS, the project requires variance approval as the existing, vacant lot lacks frontage on an improved public street; and WHEREAS, in addition to the variance that is needed for the project, a Public Lands Permit is also required to undertake improvements in unimproved Drummond Road related to driveway construction and utilities work; and WHEREAS, the applicant submitted variance and public lands permit applications on February 23, 2016 for the proposed project; and WHEREAS, details about the project are contained in Planning Report No. 16-05 dated April 28, 2016 and the applicant's submitted application and supporting materials; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R -1A Single -Family Residential. Section 129-101 of the City Code contains the regulations for the R -1A District; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. -1462- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variances with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Approval of the drainage plans, utility plans and proposed grades by the City Engineer. 5. Impervious surface coverage on the property shall not exceed 40 percent and shall be subject to the provisions of Sec. 129-385(g)(2)a as allowed for existing lots of record. 6. MCES Sewer Area Charge (SAC). The current MCES fee for a SAC unit is $2,485.00. MCES charge will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the proposed new house. 7. City Water/Sewer Trunk Area Charges. The 2016 trunk water fee is $2,000.00 per lot and the 2016 trunk sewer charge is $2,000.00 per lot. Payment of trunk water and trunk sewer charges will be collected prior to release of the building permit and will be the amount in effect at the time the building permit is issued. 8. City Water / Sewer Connection Fees. The 2016 water connection fee is $240.00 and the 2016 sewer connection fee is $240.00. The water and sewer connection fees will be collected at the time of building permit issuance for the new house to be constructed and shall be the amount in effect at the time. 9. Minimum construction elevation shall be at or above the Regulatory Flood Project Elevation of 933.0 or three feet above the ordinary high water mark of a wetland. 10. No materials shall be stockpiled in the 100 -year floodplain area(s). Staging and stockpiling activities shall be coordinated in cooperation with the Mound Public Works Department. 11. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 12. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. -1463- 13. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 14. Public Lands Permit approval for the project by the City. 15. The front setback of the proposed single-family home shall be at least six (6) feet from the front property line, which is along unimproved Galway Road. The portion of the home that can be located in the front setback area between 6 feet and 20 feet of the front property line shall be limited to 20% of the total length of the front property line. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: (- to be inserted-) Adopted by the City Council this 28" day of June, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor .,, CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WESTONKA JAYCEES DONATION TO PARKS FOR 2016 WHEREAS, the City of Mound is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to accept gifts and bequests for the benefit of recreational service pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.17; and WHEREAS, the Westonka Jaycees are a community organization that raises funds for local causes; and WHEREAS, the Westonka Jaycees have offered to contribute $15,000.00 to the Parks Department; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contribution offered; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS: 1. The contribution described above is hereby graciously acknowledged and accepted by the City of Mound. 2. The City Council directs Staff to work with the Jaycees and Parks and Open Spaces Advisory Commission to make recommendations on how the funds should be spent for consideration by the City Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mound this 28`s day of June, 2016. ATTEST: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1465- Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: June 23, 2016 SUBJECT: Indian Knoll Manor Renovation and New Construction Project 2020 Commerce Boulevard and 5524 Spruce Road Applicant: Aeon Public Hearings- Review of Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat (PC Case No. 16-15), Rezoning (PC Case No. 16-20) and Conditional Use Permit (PC Case No. 16-16) Applications Consideration of Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide property at 5524 Spruce Road (PC Case No. 16-14) Consideration of Variance (PC Case No. 16-17) Application Consideration of Expansion Permit (PC Case No. 16-18) Application Consideration of Proposed Conveyance of HRA Property for Consistency with Comprehensive Plan REQUEST SUMMARY At its June 23, 2016 meeting, the City Council will hold public hearings and consider applications submitted by Blake Hopkins, on behalf of Aeon, who is requesting multiple land use approvals and subdivision approval for the redevelopment of the existing 50 -unit Indian Knoll Manor affordable housing community located at 2020 Commerce Boulevard. The proposed project also includes the adjacent property located at 5524 Spruce Road. Consent for the applications has been given by the current property owners, the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Dan Iversen. The applicant is proposing to rehabilitate the existing Indian Knoll Manor structure, demolish two one - bedroom apartments, and build eight new apartment units. The applicant is also seeking to build 10 new three-bedroom townhomes by combining the site with the adjacent single-family property at 5524 Spruce Road. The proposed project will have 56 multi -family units in the apartment building and 10 townhome units. Approvals being requested by the applicant include a comprehensive plan amendment; rezoning; major subdivision -preliminary plat; a conditional use permit for a Planned Development Area (PDA), multi -family apartment use with more than six units, and townhouses; an expansion permit; multiple variances; and a final plat. -1466- CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS The City Code requires that a City Council public hearing is required for review of preliminary plat, rezoning and conditional use permit applications. The public hearing notice was published in the Laker on June 18, 2016 and posted on the City Hall bulletin board on June 14, 2016. The public hearing notice was mailed to all affected property owners located within 350 feet of the subject properties on June 16, 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their June 7, 2016 meeting. A public hearing was held for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Plat. A number of neighborhood residents attended and expressed concern about the project. Particular concerns raised were regarding the removal of the trees buffering this property from their neighborhood, the proximity of the townhomes to their properties, the placement of the dumpster near the eastern property line, and the amount of parking provided. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. It should be noted that at the Planning Commission meeting the applicant clarified that two additional variances were requested. One is to allow the drive aisles to be 23 feet instead of the requested 25 feet. As noted in the Planning Report, a CUP and variance to allow 24 foot drive aisles was previously granted in 2005. The second would be to allow the privacy fence on the eastern property line to be 6 feet instead of 5 feet. The height of the fence was requested the adjacent property owners in a neighborhood meeting earlier this year. After an in-depth discussion regarding the project the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, and Expansion Permit applications. The Planning Commission also found that the proposed conveyance of public property was in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the conditions recommended by Staff, the Planning Commission requested the applicant review the site plan to see if another location for the dumpster could be found. The Planning Commission also requested the applicant to research whether parking limitations for tenants could be established to address parking concerns. The applicant has requested 11 variances as part of the Planned Development Area (PDA). As members may recall, Planned Development Areas are established to allow flexibility to unique site and building characteristics that may require variances and variations from the zoning and subdivision regulations. The Planning Commission recommended approval of 8 out of the 11 variances requested by the applicant for this project. The Planning Commission specifically recommended denial of the following three variances requested by the applicant: 1. The A 7.1 foot variance for the west rear yard setback of 20 feet for the townhomes, allowing a setback of 12.9 feet. 2. A 5.0 foot variance for the north yard and the east yard from the minimum parking areas setback of 10 feet, allowing a setback of 5.0 feet. 3. A 2.0 foot variance from the 25 -foot minimum drive aisle size, allowing drive aisles of only 23 feet. -1466- A As stated in the draft June 7, 2016 Planning Commission meeting minutes, the reasons for the denial were regarding the impact the first two variances would have on the neighboring properties. The denial relative to the drive aisle was related to the feeling that 23 feet was too narrow and that there may be other site plan changes that could be made so a variance was not needed. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION The City of Mound received the attached memo from Aeon dated June 21, 2016 which responds to the Planning Commission concerns. This response includes an alternate site plan that: 1) Proposes a new location for the trash enclosure near the north property line by the existing building. 2) Proposes a 0 foot setback on the north property line for the parking lot so that the drive aisle spacing variance can be eliminated. Please note that the property to the north is a City owned property that serves stormwater ponding purposes. 3) Proposes the removal of the small concrete stoops on the rear of the townhomes to eliminate the rear yard setback variance. 4) Proposes removing the landscape islands within the parking lot to increase setbacks along the eastern property line to 10 to 15 feet. RECOMMENDATION Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendations for approval, resolutions have been prepared for your consideration. All resolutions are conditioned upon the approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as that needs to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review. Please note that the conditional use permit, expansion permit, and variances have been combined into one resolution with all 11 potential variances being listed in section 3 of the approval section. -1467- `I .eon Home Changes Everything MEMO To: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director From: Aeon Date: June 21, 2016 Subject: Responses to City of Mound's Planning Commission Recommendations on the 7' of June 2016 Thank you for reviewing Aeon's proposal for Indian Knoll Manor, a 66 -unit affordable housing development located at 2020 Commerce Blvd and 5524 Spruce Rd. As you may recall, six items were brought up at the June 7th, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting in which follow-up was requested from Aeon in advance of the June 28' City Council Meeting. We have prepared the attached site plan to reflect the recommendations and comments of the Planning Commission. A response to each item is as follows: 1) _-idditio7ed artomlafim fiom!leon aboral whether the pn�iect can have leave restrictions irlaled to parking. Aeon Management has agreed that, if necessary, parking restrictions can be put into place limiting the number of cars per household on-site. 2) S`xggest pm'king .rterrl , be updated related to Weekend right vxe(s), zf osjihle. If City Council requires an update to the parking study to be completed, Aeon will engage the Traffic Engineer to go back into the field and complete the revised study. i) f'.xplore opportunities to r�sove lraali enclosure An alternative site plan is attached with an alternative location for the trash enclosure. One of the best alternative locations for the trash enclosure is under the utility easement where it is currently shown. Aeon is checking with Xcel to determine if it can be located in this area. If the trash enclosure cannot be located within the easement, we would suggest moving it to the northern portion of the existing building. Please see site plan. 901 North 3id Street. Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-341-3148 612-341-4208F www.aeommn.org aeon Home Changes Everything 4) E,%p lore whether rite design changes could eliminate weed for valiance for drive aide. Aeon could eliminate the drive aisle variance, but in order to achieve this and maintain the walkway directly north of the townhomes, a 0 foot lot line variance would be required along the northern lot line adjacent to the city owned parcel. This would allow a buffer to remain between the northern portion of the townhomes and the parking lot, with area for a sidewalk and landscaping. Please see site plan. 5) I;af lore alternatives to eliminate variance #1 aizd #9 included in Planning Rej ort doted (acne 2, 2016 Z A 7.1 foot variance for the west rear _pard setback of 20 feet for the townhomes, allowing a setback of 12.9 feet An alternative to eliminate this variance is to remove the small concrete stoops on the back of the northernmost townhomes. By removing the stoops, the setback is 20'. Please see site plan. 9, A 5.0 foot variance for the north yard and the east yard from the minimum parking areas setback of10 feet, allowing a setback of5.0 feet. A 0 foot setback for the north yard is requested in order to increase the drive aisle to 24 feet and not push the townhomes and parking lot closer together. An east yard setback of 10 feet, and in some places 15 feet, can be achieved. Increasing this east yard setback though requires removing landscape barriers within the parking lot that break up and soften the parking lot. Please see site plan. 6) Prov de additional e foerzat ort related to nal zanrn for fenie Iiaig/�t Stemming from the neighborhood meeting Aeon held, the increased height of the fence from 5 feet to 6 feet along the eastern side of the property will provide additional privacy for the neighbors. The requested variance would be to provide privacy and minimize noise between Indian Knoll Manor and the adjacent properties. 901 North 3i° Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-34 1 -3 148 612-341.4208F www.aeon mn.org -1469- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR 5524 SPRUCE ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 16-14 PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0040 WHEREAS, as part of the approvals that are required for the project, Aeon is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the following property as follows: PID Number Property Address Acres Current Comp Plan I Proposed Comp Plan 13-117-24-32-0040 1 5524 Spruce Road 0.35 Low Density Residential High Density Residential ; and WHEREAS, consent for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request was given by Dan Iversen, who is the current property owner; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 462, Section 355, Subdivision 2 of the Minnesota State Statutes, the Planning Commission held an official public hearing on June 7, 2016 to allow formal public comment on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendment at its June 28, 2016 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby conditionally approve the Land Use Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan as, described above, and hereby authorizes Staff to submit the Land Use Amendment to the Metropolitan Council, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the Comprehensive Pian Amendment Request. 2. No future approval of any rezoning, land use, or subdivision application is included as part of this action. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 1470- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this approval is subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Adopted by the City Council this 28th of June, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -1471- Comprehensive Plan Amendment Form 1. Name of the Comprehensive Plan Indian Knoll Manor Land Use Amendment Amendment (CPA): z. Please Provide the following information: Contact Name and Title Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, City of Mound Address 2415 Wilshire Boulevard City, State, Zip Mound, MN 55364 Telephone Number 952-472-o600 Email Address sarahsmith(a)cityofmound.com 3. Identify the type of amendment (land use change, MUSA expansion, text change, forecast adjustment, etc.) and describe the amendment including location, description, affected area in acres, number of residential units in CPA area (if any), etc. Provide any additional information relevant to the amendment Type of Amendment Land Use Change Detailed Description This CPA proposes to change the land use of one parcel in the City of Mound. The 0.35 acre parcel is located at 5524 Spruce Road (PID 13-117-24-32- 0040). The amendment proposes changing the future land use of the parcel from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. The amendment is being sought as part of a larger redevelopment project which will combine the subject parcel with the adjacent High Density Residential property at 2020 Commerce Boulevard (PID 13-117-24-32-0030). The two properties will be combined for a affordable housing redevelopment project that will include redevelopment of the existing Indian Knoll Manor affordable housing complex. The project will add 16 new affordable housing units to the site, 6 to the existing Indian Knoll Manor building and 10 as new townhome units. 4. The local governing body must take action on the proposed amendment before submittal to the Metropolitan council. Provide the dates of official action Date acted upon by the planning June 72 2o16 commission Date approved by governing June 28t 2o16 body: -1472- 5. Affected Jurisdiction Review: list the adjacent local governments, school districts and other'urisdictions that were contacted and the date the copies were sent Jurisdictions A waiver of adjacent governmental review is requested. See below in Comments. Date Sent Not applicable Comments A waiver was requested because the proposed amendment: 1. Involves a site of 4o acres or less, z. Does not change the community's growth forecasts for 2010-2030 or the TAZ allocations; and 3. The site is more than one quarter (1/) of a mile from an adjacent jurisdiction. 6. Forecasts: Does the plan 0 No, no change in community -level forecasts. amendment change the adopted ❑ Yes. Identify the net changes to community -level Metropolitan Council population, forecasts household, or employment forecasts? 7. Land Use: Describe land use ❑ Not Applicable. No land use changes proposed changes (in acres) applicable to 0 Land Use All Land Uses in CPA Area this amendment site. Pre -CPA Post CPA Designation Acres Acres Low Density 0.35 0.00 Residential High Density 0.00 0.35 8. Wastewater: What type of ❑ Individual Sewage Treatment System (ISIS) wastewater treatment will be used ❑ Privately Owned/Community Treatment System to serve the proposed ❑ Local/Municipal Owned Wastewater Treatment amendment? Plant 0 Regional Wastewater Treatment g. Water Supply: Will the 0 No increase or decrease in projected water use amendment increase or decrease from the water supply plan projected water use from the ❑ Yes. Provide the water supply plan amendment community's current water as an attachment to describe necessary facilities supply? improvements or changes 10. Parks: Does the amendment ❑ No. include, or is adjacent to or within 0 Yes. If yes, indicate the name of the regional 1/z mile of an existing or planned park, reserve, or trail and describe potential impacts regional park, reserve, or trails as and mitigation plans below: identified in the Metropolitan Dakota Rail Regional Trail is located south of the Council's 204o Regional Parks property. The only impacts anticipated are an Policy Plan? I increase in use of the regional trail. -1473- ii. Implementation: Will the ❑ No. amendment require changes in ® Yes. If yes, describe proposed changes and zoning or subdivision ordinances, timeline for making those changes below: the capital improvement program (CIP), or other official controls? Changes The proposed CPA will require rezoning of the property, which is an amendment to the official zoning map. The rezoning of the property from R -z Two -Family Residential to R-3, Multiple -Family Residential has been approved by the City Council, conditional on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Timeline The City Council will adopt the amendment to the official zoning map when the Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been adopted. -1474- CITY OF MOUND ORDINANCE NO. 16 - ORDINANCE APPROVING REZONING OF 5524 SPRUCE ROAD FROM R-2 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PLANNING CASE NO. 16-20 PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0040 WHEREAS, the applicant, Aeon, has submitted land use and subdivision applications to facilitate the Indian Knoll Manor redevelopment and new construction project that includes properties located at 2020 Commerce Boulevard and 5524 Spruce Road; and WHEREAS, as part of the approvals that are required for the project, Aeon is requesting rezoning of the following subject property from R-2 Two Family Residential to R-3 Multiple Family Residential (the "Subject Property') PID No.I Address 13-117-24-32-0040 5524 Spruce Road ; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is proposed to be used for the development of townhomes consistent with the proposed R-3 zoning district which are allowed by conditional use; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has conditionally approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and authorized the submittal of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for its review and action; and WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning is compatible with land uses surrounding the subject property given that to the north is the existing Indian Knoll Manor Apartments and to the east is a two-family and single-family residential neighborhood; and WHEREAS, Commerce Boulevard (County Road 110) is able to support the development of the site for multiple -family residential; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed rezoning and recommended City Council approval on June 7, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the proposed rezoning request at their June 28, 2016 meeting; and -1475- WHEREAS, after its consideration the City Council found the proposed rezoning to be consistent with the Mound Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the rezoning request from R-2 Two Family Residential District to R-3 Multiple Family Residential based on the following findings of fact: a. The proposed rezoning is compatible with the land uses surrounding the subject property. b. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan being submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review. 2. This rezoning is approved for the Subject Property as identified in the table herein shown: PID No. Address I Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 13-117-24-32-0040 5524 Spruce Road I R-2 R-3 3. The rezoning is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. Concurrent approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. b. Payment of all related costs for the review of the rezoning application. c. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of June, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -1476- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 - RESOLUTION DETERMINING CONFORMITY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGARDING CONVEYANCE OF HRA PROPERTY WHEREAS, the proposed conveyance action of the property at 2020 Commerce Boulevard, which is owned by the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and includes the Indian Knoll Manor apartment complex, is proposed to be redeveloped by Aeon, was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its June 7, 2016 meeting, as part of the Planning Commission's review of several land use and subdivision applications for the proposed redevelopment project; and WHEREAS, details regarding the project are contained in the Planning Report dated June 2, 2016 for the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the property conveyance as it is consistent with the policies contained in the Mound Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings: The proposed conveyance of the HRA parcel is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as it facilitates the updating of Indian Knoll Manor and the project, once completed, adds 16 units of affordable housing to the community. 2. The project will also diversify the types of affordable housing by adding ten (10) 3 -bedroom units. 3. The property at 5524 Spruce Road abuts a multi -unit building. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED of the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota as follows: In accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.356 Subd. 2, the City Council hereby finds the conveyance of the HRA -owned property at 2020 Commerce Boulevard to Aeon to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. Adopted this 28th day of June, 2016. Attest: City Clerk Catherine Pausche Mayor Mark Wegscheid -1477- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 -- RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MAJOR SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT OF INDIAN KNOLL MANOR PLANNING CASE NO. 16-15 PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0030 PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0040 WHEREAS, the applicant, Aeon, has submitted a major -subdivision preliminary plat application to plat the proposed Indian Knoll Manor as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the subject properties are located on Commerce Boulevard (County Road 110) and Spruce Road at 2020 Commerce Boulevard (PID No. 13-117-24-32-0030) and 5524 Spruce Road (PID No. 13-117-24-32-0040); and WHEREAS, consent for the application was given by the current property owners, the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Dan Iversen; and WHEREAS, the properties were originally platted as multiple lots within the Lakeside Park A.L. Crocker's 1St Division; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to combine the parcels into one 1.87 acre platted parcel; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide a portion of the site from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and authorized the submittal of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for its review and action; and WHEREAS, such review and action is still pending; and WHEREAS, a portion of the site is proposed to be rezoned from R-2 Two Family Residential to R-3 Multiple Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at its June 7, 2016 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed Indian Knoll Manor major subdivision - preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, after its review the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the preliminary plat request subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its June 28, 2016 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed Indian Knoll Manor major subdivision - preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the City has considered how the proposed project might affect public health, safety, or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the major subdivision - preliminary plat, taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances, and other official controls; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the major subdivision -preliminary plat based on the following findings of fact: a. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. b. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. c. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. 2. The major subdivision -preliminary plat is hereby_approved subject to the following conditions: a. Concurrent approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, conditional use permit, variance, and expansion permit applications. b. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. c. The preliminary plat drawing labeled as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated into this Resolution and all improvements shall be as shown on the plans or as modified under the approval of the City. d. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. e. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolutions(s) with Hennepin County. Applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. f. All city approvals should be contingent on receipt of applicable federal approvals in the RAD conversion process as well as other applicable local/state/federal approvals. g. All requirements of City Code Sec. 121-87(b) regarding title shall be met. -1479- h. The building materials and color scheme shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City. i. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. The MCES SAC charge for the project shall be determined as part of final plat which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. A MCES Sewer Availability Charge determination letter shall be provided by the applicant for the existing house and greenhouse structures/uses. k. Sewer and watermain area trunk charges for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current trunk charge for sewer and water, per unit, are $2000.00 each. The park dedication fee amount shall be determined as part of the final plat as provided by City Code Sec. 121.121. m. Sewer connection and water connection fees shall be determined as part of the final plat. The 2016 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. n. The need for a development agreement, or similar agreement, shall be determined as part of the City's consideration of the final plat. 3. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby grant a waiver to allow more than one (1) principal structure on the site. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the Mayor and City Manager or City Clerk shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the applicant and City Officials and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality, all in compliance with Minnesota State Statute Chapter 462 and the City of Mound Code of Ordinances. Adopted by the City Council this 28th of June, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor H:1 Exhibit A (- preliminary plat drawings-) -1481- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16 -- RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, EXPANSION PERMITS AND VARIANCES FOR INDIAN KNOLL MANOR PLANNING CASE NO. 16-16 PLANNING CASE NO. 16-18 PLANNING CASE NO. 16-17 PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0030 PID NO. 13-117-24-32-0040 WHEREAS, the applicant, Aeon, has submitted conditional use permit, expansion permit and variance applications for the redevelopment of the proposed Indian Knoll Manor project, as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, consent for the application was given by the current property owners, the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Dan Iversen; and WHEREAS, the subject site is generally located on Commerce Boulevard (County Road 110) and Spruce Road at 2020 Commerce Boulevard and 5524 Spruce Road; and WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed a planned development area for the purposes of adding units to the existing Indian Knoll Manor and adding townhomes to the property; and WHEREAS, planned development areas are processed using a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, multiple family residential uses with more than six units and townhouses are conditionally permitted in the R-3 Multiple Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the proposed redevelopment project will enable the renovation of the existing Indian Knoll Manor apartment complex and 16 additional affordable units to the City; and WHEREAS, the existing Indian Knoll Manor building on 2020 Commerce Boulevard is nonconforming due to a building height of 38 feet; and WHERAS, the applicant is seeking an expansion permit to add units within the existing footprint of the structure to the same 38 foot height as other portions of the building; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting an expansion permit which is provided below: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. 1482- b. absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off-street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. ; and WHEREAS, the application has requested multiple variances for the planned development area (PDA); WHEREAS, the purpose of a PDA is to provide a method for variances and variations to zoning and subdivision regulations due to unusual building, site, and development characteristics; and WHEREAS, the 1.87 acre redevelopment project's unique characteristics include the redevelopment of an existing apartment building, the addition of two townhome buildings on the same lot, the presence of an overhead utility easement bisecting the property; and soil conditions that limit the ability for increased height in the existing building; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) identifies the following criteria to be used when evaluating requests for variances: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, "practical difficulties" is defined in City Code Section 129-2 as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: -1483- (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ME WHEREAS, details regarding the requested conditional use permit, expansion permit and variances for the proposed project are contained in Planning Report dated June 2, 2016 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the conditional use permits, expansion permits, and variances subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested applications at its June 7, 2016 meeting and recommended Council approval of the conditional use permit and expansion permit, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the following variances as requested by the applicant, subject to conditions: 1. A 14.5 foot variance for the townhouses' south yard along Balsam Road from the minimum townhouse street side yard setback of 30 feet, allowing a setback of 15.5 feet; 2. A 15.0 foot variance for the townhouses' south yard along Spruce Road from the minimum townhouse street side yard setback of 30 feet, allowing a setback of 15 feet. 3. A 16,878 square foot variance from the maximum hardcover of 24,441 square feet (30% x 81,470), allowing 41,319 square feet of hardcover on the property. 4. A 105,730 square foot variance from the minimum lot coverage by unit type of 187,200 square feet, allowing 66 units to be built on a 81,470 square foot lot; similarly, a 116,530 square foot variance from the minimum lot coverage for average units of 198,000 square feet (3,000 sq. ft./unit x 66 units), allowing 66 units to be built on 81,470 a square foot lot. 5. A 147 square foot variance from the minimum floor area of 640 square feet floor area for one -bedroom dwelling units, allowing 493 square feet for 1 one -bedroom dwelling unit; similarly, a 160 square foot variance from the minimum floor area of 640 square feet floor area one -bedroom dwelling units, allowing 480 square feet am for 3 one -bedroom dwelling units. 6. An 8 space variance from the minimum number of new parking spaces of 35 spaces (2.5 spaces per unit MF x 6 MF units + 2.0 spaces per unit for TH x 10 TH units), allowing for 27 new parking spaces; furthermore, a 16 indoor space variance from the minimum number of indoor parking spaces of 16 (1.0 indoor spaces per unit x 16 units), allowing for 0 indoor parking spaces. 7. A variance from parking area materials, allowing a portion of the parking area to be made out of pervious pavers. 8. A 5.0 foot variance for the north yard and the east yard from the minimum parking areas setback of 10 feet, allowing a setback of 5.0 feet. 9. A one foot variance to allow the construction of a six foot fence along the eastern property line. and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its June 28, 2016 meeting to receive public testimony on the conditional use permit as required by the City Code at which time concurrent review of the related applications for the Indian Knoll Manor project also took place; and WHEREAS, the City has considered the proposed project as it might affect public health, safety, or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the request, taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances, and other official controls; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the conditional use permits based on the following findings of fact: a. The proposed use of the site is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. b. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for type of development and use being proposed. c. The proposed development is providing adequate utilities and drainage. d. The proposed development has sufficiently considered traffic impacts and access. e. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. -1485- f. The proposed project will provide 16 additional affordable units to Mound and will increase the mix of unit types with the addition of 10 three-bedroom units. 2. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the expansion permits based on the following findings of fact: a. The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. b. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan. c. The construction of additional units within the existing footprint and up to the existing height of 38 feet is an efficient use of space on a limited site. 3. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the following variances as requested by the applicant: a. A 7.1 foot variance for the west rear yard setback of 20 feet for the townhomes, allowing a setback of 12.9 feet. b. A 14.5 foot variance for the townhouses' south yard along Balsam Road from the minimum townhouse street side yard setback of 30 feet, allowing a setback of 15.5 feet. c. A 15.0 foot variance for the townhouses' south yard along Spruce Road from the minimum townhouse street side yard setback of 30 feet, allowing a setback of 15 feet. d. A 16,878 square foot variance from the maximum hardcover of 24,441 square feet (30% x 81,470), allowing 41,319 square feet of hardcover on the property. e. A 105,730 square foot variance from the minimum lot coverage by unit type of 187,200 square feet, allowing 66 units to be built on a 81,470 square foot lot; similarly, a 116,530 square foot variance from the minimum lot coverage for average units of 198,000 square feet (3,000 sq. ft./unit x 66 units), allowing 66 units to be built on 81,470 a square foot lot. A 147 square foot variance from the minimum floor area of 640 square feet floor area for one -bedroom dwelling units, allowing 493 square feet for 1 one - bedroom dwelling unit; similarly, a 160 square foot variance from the minimum floor area of 640 square feet floor area one -bedroom dwelling units, allowing 480 square feet for 3 one -bedroom dwelling units. g. An 8 space variance from the minimum number of new parking spaces of 35 spaces (2.5 spaces per unit MF x 6 MF units + 2.0 spaces per unit for TH x 10 TH units), allowing for 27 new parking spaces; furthermore, a 16 indoor space variance from the minimum number of indoor parking spaces of 16 (1.0 indoor spaces per unit x 16 units), allowing for 0 indoor parking spaces. h. A variance from parking area materials, allowing a portion of the parking area to be made out of pervious pavers. A 5.0 foot variance for the north yard and the east yard from the minimum parking areas setback of 10 feet, allowing a setback of 5.0 feet. A 2.0 foot variance from the 25 -foot minimum drive aisle size, allowing drive aisles of only 23 feet. k. A 1.0 foot variance from the 5 foot maximum fence height, allowing a fence 6.0 feet in height along the eastern property boundary. 4. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the variances based on the following findings of fact: a. It is reasonable that the applicant seeks to continue to use the site for an affordable multi -family apartment and townhomes. b. The use of the site for multi -family residential is in keeping with the land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. c. As a Planned Development Area, flexibility through variances is intended to achieve community goals and policies. d. The variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. e. The applicant is limited in the layout of the site due to an existing easement for overhead electric transmission lines. f. The applicant needs additional units in order to finance the proposed capital improvements to the existing Indian Knoll Manor and ongoing maintenance of the facility. g. Soil conditions prevented the additional units from being constructed within the existing footprint of the building. h. Site layout and design is influenced by a number of factors, including the site size, the existing location of Indian Knoll Manor, two roads and the need for three separate principal structures. 5. The conditional use permits, expansion permits, and variances are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: a. Concurrent approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat, variance, and expansion permit applications. b. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. c. The approvals are for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: (to be inserted). 1487- d. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the applications. e. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. Adopted by the City Council this 281" of June, 2016, Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Exhibit A MINUTES JUNE 7, 2016 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners David Goode, Bill Stone, Pete Wiechert, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Members absent: Jason Baker, Doug Gawtry, and Jeffrey Bergquist. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Gerald Vandam, 5816 Grandview Blvd;iBlak 2645 Halstead La; Chris Rydrych, 5510 Spruce Rd; Chris Carlson, 554, Aspen Rd; Aubrie Gould, Aeon; Ellen Gomoll, 5508 Breezy Rd Terry Cheri Erickson; Sherrie Pugh, 5567 Spruce Rd; Pat & Dianne Brickley, Snyder, 4749 S Lake Sarah Dr, Independence; Roger Fink, Trident De) APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION by Goode, second by Stone, unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS 2020 Commerce Boulevard and 5524 Spruce Roa Applicant: Aeon Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Public Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat (Public Permits of HRA Property for the Hopkins, Aeon; Kathy Bergquist, ipruce Rd; Wayde Fleener, 6020 arkey, 5508 Breezy Rd; Jim Turner; 514 Spruce Rd; Millie & Gene MOTION carried with Comprehensive Plan Sarah Smith introduced the project and the applications to be discussed. The applicant, Blake Hopkins, of Aeon, has applied for multiple 1and use approvals and subdivision approval for the redevelopment of the existing 50 -unit Indian Knoll Manor affordable housing community. The proposed project also incorporates the adjacent property located at 5524 Spruce Road. The applicant is proposing to rehab the existing Indian Knoll Manor structure, demolish two one -bedroom apartments, build eight new apartment units, and build 10 new three-bedroom townhomes. Approvals requested include a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, major subdivision - preliminary plat, conditional use permit (CUP) for a planned development area (PDA) for a multiple -family project, variances, expansion permits and a major subdivision -final plat. A determination that the proposed HRA property conveyance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan is also required. ..1 Rita Trapp explained existing site conditions, including the utility easement that runs diagonally through the site. The preliminary plat will combine the 2 properties into 1 lot. Ms. Trapp summarized the requests and highlighted findings from the Planning Report. Comprehensive Plan Amendment—As noted in the Planning Report, 2020 Commerce Boulevard is designated high density residential and the Spruce property is designated low density residential. The applicant has requested an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the low density to high density. The (2) Comprehensive Plan land use goals and (6) housing goals related to the proposed project are highlighted in the Planning Report. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan requires approval by the Metropolitan Council. The City will be seeking a waiver of adjacent governmental review of the requested amendment to the Comprehensive Plan which will be determined by the Metropolitan Council Rezoning — It has been requested to rezone the Spruce lot to R-3, which is consistent to the high density residential designation that is being requested with the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat —The Indian Knoll Manor preliminary plat takes in the total 1.87 acre site. As the applicant will own and operate the entire site, it is seen as appropriate to waive the "one townhouse on one lot" requirement as they will be rental only and managed collectively. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — The City uses the CUP as the regulatory tool for standards for the Planned Development Area (PDA). A CUP is also required for multiple family uses over 6 units in the R-3 district. In addition to lot size and layout requirements, the CUP for the Planned Development Area (PDA) can regulate parking and sidewalks, building materials, landscaping, glare, refuse, wetlands and stormwater, utilities and park dedication. There is an existing CUP for this property. Expansion Permits — The applicant requests expansion permit approval to allow for the construction of additional units to the existing IKM building to the same height as the existing structure. The applicant originally proposed making modifications and adding all the units to the original building. Soil conditions would not allow the addition of all the desired units so the proposed site plan with townhomes has been proposed. Variances — Requested variances in rear yard townhouse setback, townhouse street setbacks along Balsam Road and Spruce Road;hardcover, unit lot coverage, minimum floor area, minimum number of parking spaces, parking; materials, and parking area setbacks, in addition to those outlined in the Planning Report, additional variances are requested for a smaller drive aisle and fence height of 6 feet. PDA projects due to their unique circumstances often require flexibility from code regulations. The existing development has 40 parking spaces for 50 units and no indoor parking. This was approved in 2005 under the current CUP. A parking study was provided by the applicant. The study estimates that peak stalls needed on weekdays is 46-51 and on Saturdays, it is estimated at 56-61 stalls. Based on the peak analysis findings, the parking study recommended 64 stalls and the applicant proposes 66 stalls. A variance in 2005 permitted 24 ft drive aisles; requirement is 25 ft. Applicant is requesting a variance to allow 2 aisles to be 23 ft and the 3rd aisle at 25 ft. -1491- Applicant is requesting the use of pervious pavers for on-site water filtration instead of concrete or bituminous which requires a variance. Street side setbacks require 10 ft. Applicant is requesting a variance to allow 5 ft on the north property line. Landscaping meets the required mix; however, the applicant is proposing a 6 ft fence instead of the required 4-5 ft which was at the request of the neighbors. The proposed fence is wood. Plantings would also be included. Major Subdivision -Final Plat — Review will take place after the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is approved by the Met Council and only at the Council level. Park dedication fee will be addressed as part of the final plat process. Evaluation of HRA Property Conveyance for Comp Plan Consistency -Determination that the proposed property conveyance is consistent with the Comp Plan is required from the Planning Commission per statute as the HRA parcel is a public property. MCWD and Hennepin County have also reviewed the project and provided comments as listed in the Planning Report. Smieja asked about the number of variances. Trapp indicated that there are 11 Stone questioned whether the variances are minimized. Trapp understood that there were other proposals but, due to soil conditions and several other factors, this is where they landed. Smieja asked, in adding 16 units of affordable housing where that puts related to our goal. Trapp thought that the goal 60-70 units. She further explained the Met Council requirement and how it is distributed. Trapp explained that the varF and the site was severely imp is balancing limitations of the Smieja asked if there are project but some of the I new Product `inthe area. Smieja queried about the square applicant is meeting them. Smieja inquired about would confirm. needed to the realities of financing affordable housing projects eleasement for the overhead electric utility lines. The applicant makine the numbers work. mes in the area. Smith said there were not as a may allow individual units to be rented out. This is a requirements in the townhomes. Trapp stated that the parking spaces to the townhomes. Staff did not believe so but Goode queried about how the parking lot drives were measured. Trapp said it was from the end of one stall to the end of the other. Blake Hopkins introduced Aubrey Gould and Larry Prinz as members of the Aeon team. Aeon is a non- profit company based in Minneapolis. Aeon owns and manages 40 apartment communities. Mr. Hopkins explained the architectural standards that they desired to keep and reasons why the 23 ft drive width was required. The applicant is planning expanded sidewalks, plantings at the entrance and courtyard as well as perimeter landscaping. They showed the additional apartment units and described the exterior finishes on both housing styles. 1492 Stone asked why 6 townhomes were planned and if they had considered only 5 to get 25 ft in parking aisle width and additional green space. Mr. Hopkins stated that the 6 units were needed to make the numbers work. It was stated that the current occupancy is not 100% because of construction phasing. There is a waiting list. Smieja wanted to know if there is a current wait list and if there is a market for 3 bedroom townhomes. Gould indicated that there is a waiting list of 200+ for 3 bedrooms. Penner queried as to the maximum occupancy for 3 bedrooms. Ms. Gould stated that it's generally 1.5 persons per bedroom. There will be an estimated additional of 80-85 people at maximum mix of adults and children for the new units. Stone asked if parking will be assigned. Mr. Hopkins stated that the There is no fee. Stone stated that there doesn't seem to underutilized. Typically there are not 2 t members working different shifts. Ther, site technician to provide maintenance. Penner observed that, on parking. Mr. Prinz said that theylot count, expanding out instead of up, ratio. Penner asked for clarification just cost prohibitive to correct. Chair Penner opened the public hea Chris Carlson; 5950 West Branch Mi neighborhood, space and parkir would never get this many varia nowhere near enough parking. enough parkin] per unit. Ofter ii bean on-site there are a lot at weekday ar utility easeme the soils issue at to all residents. d said that parking is be a shared car for family manager 40 hours per week and a s and asked about guest Three issues, the site unit ned the design to the proposed parking dangerous. Prinz indicated that it was said that the development is surrounded by a and cars are in the street year-round. A private company has a traffic problem and commented that there is Chris Rydryck, 5510 Spruce Road, said that he has a construction background. The sale of the property is contingent on this project being approved; for a regular developer this would never happen. It is not helping or benefitting the neighborhood. Currently, he cannot see the building. They are removing a lot of trees and there will be no buffer. Trash dumpster along his property line will smell. Financial hardship is not an argument for approval. This is an overbuild of what's currently there; too many variances, inadequate buffer, not justifiable. It would be different if there was a buffer. The neighborhood is losing its character. Terry Starkey, 5508 Breezy Rd, bought in 2004 and at that time there was lots of woods and not enough parking. The parking project (2005) took down trees and the drainage pond that was constructed took out another group of trees. Ms. Starkey also commented that the dumpster is right along the lot line and there are too many variances which doesn't make sense. -1493- Pat Brickley, 5514 Spruce Rd, because of elevations the fences will have no impact. Townhome parking will happen on street during the summer because it is closest. The dumpster is in a terrible place. A private company would never get that many variances. This will impact the neighbor negatively. Chris Rydryck would like to see the applications. Staff requested he leave his email and it would be provided. Chris Carlson felt it was a quality of life issue. There's little usable space. A non-profit is a business. Why should that make a difference? It is overcrowded. The parking plan is hard to understand. Chair Penner closed public hearing at 10:10 p.m. Smieja thought that the starting point is to review the Plan. Trapp related that amendments to Comprehensive PI communities that are not foreseen at the time of Com parcel was not anticipated to change. There are limitf the city. Downtown is a possibility but nothing has ha set by the Met Council and the City is required to ensi medium and high density residential housing and that of affordable housing. mveyance as it relates to the Comprehensive are expected because of changes in ehensive Plan implementation. The Spruce opportunities for high density in other areas of ened as yet. The affordable housing goals are that there is enough land designated for ols are in place that support the development Stone asked what the impact would be if townhomes aren't built. Trapp said that whether or not a specific project is built doesn't impact our ability to meet our requirements for the Comprehensive Plan. Smieja stated that this proposal is what Aeon says it would take to take over this project. Finance Director Catherine Pausche gave the historyof IKM. Originally there was a small management team running it. There was no physical staff on site to follow through or verify services to the building. The recession hit and funding fromHUD was drying up The City could barely keep operations going with a skeleton staff on-site. The property was deteriorating. Millions of dollars will be invested in the existing building to bring it up to par. Timing was perfect. Townhomes vs. another large building feels more residential with a less expansive footprint. Stone wanted to know what happens if the parking is not adequate. Mr. Hopkins said there is the option of restricting the number of parking spaces per household. Parking studies indicate that the parking is adequate. The studies looked at current use as well as various affordable housing projects in the western Hennepin County fora comparison. Stone asked that, if the building is in such disrepair and infrastructure is past its lifetime, does rehab make sense. Mr. Hopkins said that new construction comparison was way more expensive. Stone asked how Aeon will respond to the fence and dumpster issues brought up by the residents. Ms. Gould stated that the fence height was revised as a result of the neighborhood meeting. The location of the dumpster will be revisited as well. Peterson asked about examples of where Aeon has come into a neighborhood like this and how it's worked or how it hasn't. Ms. Gould responded that they've been very lucky to have been invited into communities. This is a lot of their success. -1494- Trapp reminded the Commission that the parking arrangements are tied to the CUP. If we don't do any car limitations and the parking isn't working we can impose some restrictions through the CUP review. Chris Carlson questions the affordable housing ratios between Mound and surrounding communities. There is another comprehensive plan process coming where this could really be looked at. Mr. Hopkins stated that Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) financing does have a time limit. Peterson acknowledged the funding that Aeon has sought for the project and asked if Aeon was surprised at how large the award was. Mr. Hopkins stated that this project was immediately funded, which is unusual as most projects take a few years of funding requests. Mr. Hopkins feels that a big reason for their ability to secure funding is the preservation and expansion of existing affordable housing. Smieja summarized that everyone needs housing; no one the abutting neighbors. Smieja supports the project but t impacting the neighbors. There's an opportunity for imps neighbors. Regarding the parking: if it's right that's great wrong we have the CUP process to circle back. Trapp asked Smieja which variances he would like removed. '- concern. Trapp reminded him that it will take the patios off tf #9 (north and east setback) and #10 (23ft drive aisle). Mr. Hopkins was asked if the June 16`h funding deadline could was the extension and that they will have to submit what they acted yet anyway. Smith stated that the Planning Commission Work Rules state that end at 11:00 p.m. unless waived. MOTION by Smieja, second by MOTION by Goode, second MOTION by Smieja,; second by Sl Plan of the Spruce parcel to high :lose to them. This project impacts tsupport the variances that are s with a reduced impact on the we are optimizing land use, if it's his primary iuld also remove d. He replied that June 16th City Council wouldn't have Commission meetings !ting to 11:30. MOTION passed. Voting for: inst: Goode the meeting to 11:15. MOTION passed unanimously. to recommend approval of the reguiding of the Comprehensive ity residential. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by5tone, to recommend approval of the conveyance of the HRA property as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan based on findings 1 & 2 and property is abutting a current multi -unit property. MOTION passed. Voting for: Goode, Stone, Wiechert, Smieja, and Peterson. Voting against: Penner. MOTION by Peterson, second by Stone, to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. MOTION passed. Voting for: Goode, Stone, Wiechert, Smieja, and Peterson. Voting against: Penner. MOTION by Smieja, second by Stone, to recommend approval of the rezoning of the Spruce property from R-2 to R-3. MOTION passed unanimously. -1495- MOTION by Smieja, second by Stone, to recommend approval of the Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat eliminating condition 5 as stated in the Planning Report. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Peterson, second by Stone, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit including a friendly amendment by Smieja to re-evaluate the location of the dumpster. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Stone, to recommend approval of the Expansion Permit. MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to recommend approval of the variances with the removal of #1 (west rear yard setback), #9 (parking lot setback from the north andeast yards) and #10 (drive aisle width). MOTION passed unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Stone, to recommend denial of variance #1, #9 and #10. MOTION passed unanimously. Findings of Fact: Smieja stated that his primary concern was that it was a good, project but the variances impacting the abutting neighbors needed to be minimized; also minimize compromises to the parking lot arrangement. Findings of Fact for Ms. Penner's negative votes: Ms. Penner felt'rushed to support actions at this time. -1496- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Consulting Planners Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: lune 2, 2016 (Revised 6-22-2016 to correct PC Case No. for Rezoning) SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Comprehensive Plan Amendment (#16-14) Rezoning (#16-20) Public Hearing - Preliminary Plat—Major Subdivision (#16-15) Conditional Use Permit (#16-16) Variance (#16-17) Expansion Permit (#16-18) Final Plat (#16-19) Conveyance of HRA Property for Consistency with Comprehensive Plan APPLICANT: Blake Hopkins, Aeon LOCATION: 2020 Commerce Boulevard and 5524 Spruce Road MEETING DATE: June 7, 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: High Density Residential and Low Density Residential ZONING: R-3 Multiple Family Residential / R-2 Two Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Blake Hopkins, of Aeon, has applied for multiple land use approvals and subdivision approval for the redevelopment of the existing 50 -unit Indian Knoll Manor affordable housing community located at 2020 Commerce Boulevard. The proposed project also includes the adjacent property located at 5524 Spruce Road. Consent for the applications has been given by the current property owners, the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) and Dan Iversen. The applicant is proposing to rehabilitate the existing Indian Knoll Manor structure, demolish two one -bedroom apartments, and build eight new apartment units. The applicant is also seeking to build 10 new three-bedroom townhomes by combining the site with the adjacent single-family property at 5524 Spruce Road. The two lots will be combined to create Lot 1, Block 1 of the Indian Knoll Manor plat. The proposed project will have 56 multi -family units in the apartment building and 10 townhome units. Further descriptions of the units proposed may be found in the attached project narrative. Approvals being requested by the applicant include a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat, a conditional use permit for a Planned Development Area (PDA) and to build a -1497- Aeon —Indian Knoll Manor —PC Report —June 7, 2016 multi -family apartment with more than six units, multiple variances, multiple expansion permits, and a final plat. As the proposed project also includes acquisition of the publicaliy- owned HRA property by Aeon, the Planning Commission must review the proposed conveyance and make a determination that the conveyance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as required by MS 463.356, Subd 2. A copy of the statute has been included PREVIOUS APPROVALS Resolution No. 05-119 was adopted on August 23, 2005 and approved a CUP and variance for a parking lot expansion project at 2020 Commerce Boulevard to include 41 outdoor parking spaces, a 24 -foot drive aisle width, and waiver of the parking lot fencing requirements. A parking stall variance was previously approved at 2020 Commerce Boulevard in 1970 which allowed the construction of 16 stalls. REVIEW PROCEDURE The applications under review include the following land use and subdivision requests. • Comprehensive Plan • Rezoning • Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat • Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a PDA and multi -family use with over six units • Variances (multiple) • Expansion Permit (multiple) • Final Plat • Review of HRA Property Conveyance to Aeon 60 -Day Land Use Application Review Process Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60 -day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, "Day 1" is determined to be May 4, 2016 as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 645.15 for the conditional use permit, variance, rezoning and expansion permit applications. "Day 1" for the comprehensive plan amendment was deemed to be May 5, 2016. -1498- Page 2 Aeon —Indian Knoll Manor —PC Report —June 7, 2016 120 -day Subdivision Review Process Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 462.358, local government agencies are required to approve or deny subdivision requests within 120 days. For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes Section 462,358, "Day 1" is determined to be May 4, 2016 in accordance with MS. 645.15. The 120 -day timeline expires on or around August 31, 2016. An extension of the review period can occur if agreed to by the applicant. Public Hearings City Code Section 121-61 requires that a public hearing for review of the preliminary plat be held by the Planning Commission. Minnesota Statutes also requires the Planning Commission to hold a public hearing regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The public hearing notice was published in the Laker on May 28, 2016 and posted on the City Hall bulletin board on May 24, 2016. The public hearing notice was mailed to all affected property owners located within 350 feet of the subject properties on May 26, 2016. NEIGHBORHOOD/RESIDENT MEETINGS The applicant has had three meetings with Indian Knoll Manor residents and one meeting with neighborhood property owners to discuss the proposed project. A copy of the presentation from one of the meetings is available on the City's website. STAFF / CONSULTANT / AGENCY / UTILITIES REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants agencies, and private utilities for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received as part of the routing and review process have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See comments provided below: City Attorney Melissa Manderscheid • All city approvals should be contingent on receipt of applicable federal approvals in the RAD conversion process as well as other applicable local/state/federal approvals. ® All requirements of City Code Sec. 121-87(b) regarding title shall be met. Scott Qualle, Building Official No comment Dan Faulkner, City Engineer No comment Eric Hoversten, Public Works Director 1499 - Page 3 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 No comment James Grube, Hennepin County The May 12, 2016 letter received by the City states the site will continue to use the existing internal driveway via Balsam Road, anticipating minimal impact on access to County Road 110 (Commerce Blvd). The existing 80 feet of right-of-way along the corridor is sufficient for future roadway needs. Any construction in the county right-of-way will require approval of the appropriate permits through Hennepin County. Rachel Workin, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District The applicant is currently working with MCWD on stormwater management requirements. Orono Police Department No comment DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL REVIEW Comprehensive Plan Amendment The parcel at 2020 Commerce Blvd is designated as High Density Residential in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. High Density Residential is described as having a "density range in excess of 12 units per acre and accommodated multi -building apartment and assisted living facilities. These are intensive residential uses that are appropriate along arterials and collector streets." The continued use of the site at 2020 Commerce Boulevard is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan designation. The parcel at 5524 Spruce Road is currently designated as "Low Density Residential." Low Density Residential is described as having a "density range from 1 to 6 units per acre. This category accounts for the largest percentage of the housing in Mound. Typical housing types include single family attached and detached within the density range." The applicant has requested a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the low density designation of this parcel to high density residential. The proposed redevelopment of both sites will result in 66 units on a 1.87 acre site, equating to a density of 35.29 units per acre. Review of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment focuses on evaluating whether the proposed land use achieves the community's vision and goals for the area. it also should be based on whether the local and regional transportation and utility infrastructure can accommodate the proposed change. in Chapter Three of the Comprehensive Plan, Mound's Vision is: Located on the western shores of Cake Minnetonka, Mound is a full-service community that recognizes and appreciates its unique setting. Its strong neighborhoods, quality schools, walkability and lake access make it a desirable place for residents of all ages. In the heart of the community, downtown is easily -1500- Page 4 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 accessible with places for people to live, shop, work and gather. Our commitment to preserving the natural environment ensures everyone can enjoy the community's four lakes and numerous wetlands, varied topography, open spaces and parks. Chapter Three of the Comprehensive Plan also outlines a set of goals and policies in the areas of land use, housing, parks, open space and recreation, and transportation. In addition to serving as the basis for the creation of the Comprehensive Plan, the goals and policies are to be used in evaluating ideas and proposals that may result in changes to the Comprehensive Plan. To assist in the review of the proposed land use change, the following policies from land use and housing were identified as being relevant to the evaluation of the requested amendment: Land Use 1. Establish appropriate residential land use densities to accommodate changing household sizes & types, development patterns, housing types and aesthetic values. 2. Promote land use pattern changes that are compatible and transitional with existing development patterns. Housing 1. Encourage a mixture of life -cycle housing types to provide for all stages of life while maintaining a predominately single family housing base throughout the city. 2. Recognize unique historical platting practices in certain areas by allowing some flexibility in the application of current bulk/area regulations. Flexibility may be considered when it can be demonstrated that the integrity and intent of the comprehensive plan is not compromised. 3. Promote ongoing maintenance and orderly appearance of residential structures and surrounding yard areas. 5. Ensure infill and redevelopment of housing areas are designed appropriately to integrate into the surrounding neighborhood. 6. Promote and support the development of new affordable housing units to meet the community's share of the regional affordable housing needs as well as the community's affordable housing goals. (Note: The item numbers listed correspond to the Comp Plan.) Staff is supportive of the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendment as it facilitates the updating of Indian Knoll Manor and adds 16 units of affordable housing to the community. The project will also diversify the types of affordable housing by adding 10 three-bedroom townhome units. -1501- Page 5 Aeon - Indian Knoll Manor - PC Report - June 7, 2016 An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan requires approval by the Metropolitan Council. In order for the Metropolitan Council to commence review of an application for a comprehensive plan amendment, the Planning Commission must recommend approval of the amendment and the City Council must authorize the amendment via a resolution. The City of Mound will be seeking a waiver of adjacent governmental review. Administrative review and waiver of adjacent governmental review will be determined by the Metropolitan Council at time of submittal. Rezoning The applicant has requested a rezoning of 5524 Spruce Road from R-2, Two -Family Residential to R-3, Multiple -Family Residential, The Zoning Ordinance directs that rezoning requests should reflect the goals and policies of the community. As considered in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request, the proposed rezoning of this property will achieve multiple goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In particular, it will provide a location for expanded affordable multiple family residential housing, a housing type that continues to be needed in Mound. As with many communities, the City of Mound has more zoning districts than land use categories in the Comprehensive Plan. This is due to the general nature of the Comprehensive Plan versus the specific guidance intended to be provided through zoning. in 2012, the City of Mound established with the Metropolitan Council which zoning districts were consistent with what land use categories. The High Density Residential land use category was deemed to be consistent with R-3 zoning district. The proposed rezoning of this property to R-3 will therefore be consistent with the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment designation of high density residential. Preliminary Plat (Sec. 121-61 through Sec. 121-64) The Indian Knoll Manor preliminary plat encompasses the total 1.87 acre site. The site will only have one lot, Lot 1 Block 1 that is 81,470 square feet (1.87 acres). The remainder of the site (600 sq. ft. = 0.01 acres) is within the right-of-way of Spruce Road. There is a 50 foot wide utility easement for the overhead electrical transmission lines that runs diagonally through the site. Sec. 129-103(C)(2)(d) states that no more than one townhouse shall be located on any one platted lot. it further states that the City Council may waive this platting requirement upon recommendation of the Planning Commission. The applicant is seeking to have all the townhomes on one lot as they will be rental townhomes and they will be managed collectively. -1502- Page 6 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) The City of Mound uses the Conditional Use Permit as the regulatory tool for establishing the dimension and design standards for a Planned Development Area (PDA). A CUP is also required for multi -family uses in the R-3 district that have more than 6 units. The site has an existing CUP for the multi -family use of the site. As part of the PDA, the applicant has applied for a number of variances to the underlying zoning standards of the R-3 Multi Family District, as well as expansion permits which will allow for the expansion of existing non -conformities. The following review will assess all aspects of a site plan review and highlight any areas where the proposed PDA varies from the underlying zoning. Lot Size and Layout Requirements In this PDA the lot is proposed to have the apartment building, a building with four townhouses, and a building with six townhouses. Each of these building are considered principal structures and as such, the setback requirements will apply to the closest use, when applicable. - Lot Dimensions (Sec. 129-103(e)(1)) -1503- Page 7 Requirements Existing Proposed Variance / Expansion Lot Size 22,000 sq. ft. 81,470 sq. ft. Lot Width 120 ft. 210 ft. Front Yard (West) 1.5 x building height 1.5 x 38 = 57 ft. 22.8 ft. 22.8 ft. Existing condition Rear Yard (West) 20 ft. 12.9 ft. Variance 7.1 ft. Side Yard (North) Building Height 38 ft. 23.6 ft. T 23.6 ft. Existing condition Street Side Yard (South) - Townhouses - Balsam Road 30 ft. 15.5 ft. Variance 14.5 ft. - Spruce Road 30 ft. 15.0 ft. Variance 15.0 ft. - Multi -Family (Balsam Road) Building Height 38 ft. 29.3 ft. 29.3 ft. Existing condition Hardcover (30%) Max of 24,441 sq. ft. 41,319 sq. ft. Variance 16,878 sq. ft. Building Height Townhouses 35 ft. 25.5 ft. Multi -Family 35 ft. 1 38.0 ft. 38.0 ft. Existing condition -1503- Page 7 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report— June 7, 2016 Lot area per dwelling (Sec. 129-103(e)(2)) The City Code requires that lots with townhouse and multi -family residential units have a minimum square -footage size based on unit mixture. The table below summarizes existine conditions as well as what is proposed as part of this project. As shown in the table, the proposed project will not meet the minimum lot area standards by more than 100,000 square feet. It is important to note that the existing use of the lot also does not meet minimum standards. Give that the proposed project has less conformance with the code than the existing conditions a variance has been requested for this standard. -1504- Page 8 Lot Size Existing Proposed Number Minimum Lot Number Minimum Lot Unit Type Required per Unit of Units Area Required of Units Area Required 4 -unit TH 4,500 sq. 0 0 sq. ft. 4 18,000 sq. ft. Structure ft./unit 6 -unit TH 4,000 sq. 0 0 sq. ft. 6 24,000 sq. ft. Structure ft./unit Efficiency & 1 2,400 sq. 49 117,600 sq. ft. 51 122,400 sq. ft. Bedroom Units ft./unit 2 Bedroom 4,560 sq. 1 4,560 sq. ft. 5 22,800 sq. ft. Units ft./unit Total Required 50 122,160 sq. ft. 66 187,200 sq. ft. Average 3,000 sq. 50 150,000 sq. ft. 66 198,000 sq. ft. Required ft./unit Existing/ Variance Proposed 65,192 sq. ft. 81,470 sq. ft. As shown in the table, the proposed project will not meet the minimum lot area standards by more than 100,000 square feet. It is important to note that the existing use of the lot also does not meet minimum standards. Give that the proposed project has less conformance with the code than the existing conditions a variance has been requested for this standard. -1504- Page 8 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 - Lot usage (Sec. 129-103(e)(3)) As shown in the table below the proposed project meets the lot usage requirements. Usage Allowed (%) Proposed (%) Proposed (sq. ft.) Main or Principal Structures No more than 30% 23.9% 19,486 sq. ft. Green Areas & Landscape Areas Must be greater than 30% 49.3% 40,151 sq. ft. Parking, Driveways, Garages, etc. No more than 40% 26.8% 21,833 sq. ft. - Efficiency Units (Sec. 129-103(e)(5)k) City Code limits the number of efficiency units in a multiple family dwelling to 20%. The existing apartment building at 2020 Commerce Blvd has 50 units, 16 of which are efficiency, making up 32.0% of the units. The redevelopment will add to the overall number of units (56), thus bringing down the percentage of efficiency units to 28.5%. This will decrease the level of non -conformity from the existing conditions. - Unit Size (Sec. 129-199) The existing facility is currently non -conforming as it does not have any units that meet minimum unit sizes. The table below shows both existing conditions and the proposed new units that will not meet unit size requirements. It is important to note that these are all within the apartment building. Given that the additional units are within the same footprint as the existing structure it would be difficult for the applicant to add square footages to the units. The applicant has requested a variance for the unit size of four new 1 -bedroom units added to the development. All of the proposed townhouse units are larger than the 960 square feet required for 3 -bedroom townhouse units. -1505- Page 9 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 Unit Type Required Minimum Size Unit Size Number of Units Existing Units Efficiency — C 480 sq. ft. 371 sq. ft. 16 1 Bedroom — Al 640 sq. ft. 481 sq. ft. 10 1 Bedroom — A2 640 sq. ft. 483 sq. ft. 2 1 Bedroom —A3 640 sq. ft. 482 sq. ft. 19 2 Bedroom — B1 760 sq. ft. 736 sq. ft. 1 Proposed Units 1 Bedroom — A4 640 sq. ft. 493 sq. ft. 1 1 Bedroom — A5 640 sq. ft. 480 sq. ft. 3 2 Bedroom — B2 760 sq. ft. 860 sq. ft. 1 2 Bedroom — B3 760 sq. ft. 860 sq. ft. 1 2 Bedroom — B4 760 sq. ft. 860 sq. ft. 2 Parking & Sidewalk Requirements (Sec 129-103(e) and Sec. 129-323) - Parking Spaces The existing multi -family building at 2020 Commerce Boulevard has 40 parking spaces for 50 units. There are no indoor parking spaces on site. The current parking number and mix was approved by a CUP and Variance on August 23, 2005 (Resolution No. 05- 119). The proposed redevelopment will add six multi -family units. Each unit is required to have 2.5 spaces per unit, one of which is indoors. Each of the 10 new townhouse units requires 2 spaces per unit, one of which is indoors. Application of these standards would require a total of 35 additional parking spaces, with 16 required to be indoors. The applicant is proposing the addition of 27 parking spaces, none of which are indoors. A variance has been requested for parking requirements. The attached parking study was provided by the applicant. The parking study examined parking usage data for the current Indian Knoll Manor as well as two other Aeon apartments in Chaska. The study found that the existing parking supply at Indian Knoll Manor is 40 spaces, or 10 spaces greater than the peak observed demand. The parking study found that the estimated peak parking demand on a weekday ranges from 46 to -1506- Page 10 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 51 stalls and on Saturday range from 56 to 61 stalls. The recommended parking supply is 64 spaces. The applicant is proposing 66 spaces. Drive Aisle The same variance from 2005 also permitted the site to have 24 foot drive aisles in the parking area, rather than the required 25 foot drive aisle. The applicant has requested this variance apply for the new parking areas in the project. - Materials The City Code requires that multi -family parking areas be covered with concrete or blacktop. In the interest of promoting on-site water filtration, the applicant has proposed using pervious pavers in parts of the parking area and has requested a variance to use these materials. There are examples of alternate pervious products used for parking areas in Mound. - Setbacks from ROW The City Code does not allow multi -family parking spaces within 20 feet of the public right-of-way. The existing parking lot for 2020 Commerce Blvd is 10 feet from the public right-of-way. While the proposed redevelopment will also not meet the requirement, it will improve setbacks to 16 feet. - Setbacks from Adjacent Property Multi -family parking areas must be setback 10 feet from adjacent properties. The existing parking lot at 2020 Commerce Blvd is currently nonconforming as it has a setback of six feet from the adjacent lot to the north. The applicant is seeking a variance to allow a five foot setback from the north and east lot lines. - Walkways The applicant has proposed a number of walkways connecting the units to the parking area, as well as walkways to move through the site. Building Materials (Sec. 129-328) The additions to the existing apartment building at 2020 Commerce Blvd will be of the same materials and look as the existing structure. A refresh of the exterior of the multi -family building is planned as part of this project. The townhouses will primarily use fiber cement siding and asphalt shingles for the roof. Staff has requested the applicant bring samples to the Planning Commission meeting. -1507- Page 11 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 Landscaping (Sec 129-103(e)• Sec. 129-317) The applicant submitted a landscaping plan as part of their application. A number of the existing trees on the site will be removed in order to accommodate the new townhouses and parking areas on the site. Ninety-three trees of varying types and sizes will be planted around the buildings and parking areas. This meets the landscaping requirement for multi -family residential of a minimum one tree per dwelling unit (66). Forty-one trees will be coniferous, which is 44% of the mix, meeting minimum landscaping requirements. Significant plantings and improvements will be focused on the entrance to the apartment building, the courtyard of the apartment building, and around the townhouses. Plantings will be used to screen the parking area and the townhouses from the adjacent lot to the east. A 6 foot wood fence is proposed to separate the site from the adjacent properties to the east. Applicant shall revise the height of this fence to between four and five feet to meet the limitations set forth in Sec. 129-317(c)(4) A retaining wall will be used to screen the parking area from the adjacent lot to the north. Glare (Sec. 129-318) A photometric plan was submitted with the application. Preliminary findings are that it does meet the requirement of not casting light greater than 0.4 footcandles on adjacent residential properties. Staff will be following up with the applicant to confirm that the light closest to Balsam Road will not have a brightness greater than 1.0 footcandle by the centerline of the street as is required. Refuse (Sec. 129-3151 The trash and other refuse for the apartments will be collected and stored in the existing refuse facility at the north side of the building. The townhouses will utilize a new refuse storage area adjacent to the parking lot on the east side of the property. The trash will be contained within a 150 sq. ft. enclosure with walls 6.1 feet in height. Applicant to confirm that the proposed storage area will also accommodate recycling activities. Wetlands Floodplain Grading and Stormwater Management (Sec. 129-351; Sec. 129-3851 The site is located in Zone X according to the floodplain map and is not encumbered by any wetlands. The applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan as well as a SWPPP for the property. The applicant has submitted a permit application to the MCWD which is under review. Minimum required construction elevations shall be as required by the City Code. -1508- Page 12 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 Utilities 1. Public water and sanitary sewer utilities have already been established for the site. 2. The MCES SAC charge for the project shall be determined as part of final plat which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. An MCES Sewer Availability Charge determination letter shall be provided by the applicant for the existing house/uses. 3. Sewer and watermain area trunk charges for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current trunk charge for sewer and water, per unit, is $2000.00 each. 4. Sewer connection and water connection fees shall be determined as part of the final plat. The 2015 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. Park Dedication As provided by City Code Sec. 121-121, a park dedication fee, in lieu of land dedication is recommended by Staff. The required park dedication amount shall be determined as part of the final plat. Expansion Permits Expansion permits offer an opportunity for a nonconformity to be expanded if it will not further intrude into the required setback beyond the distance of the existing structure. As seen in the CUP review above, the applicant requests an expansion permit to allow for the construction of new units to the 3`d and 4'h stories of the structure to the same height of 38 feet. This is an expansion permit as the maximum height allowed in the R-3 Multi -Family District is 35 feet. City Code Section 129-40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be granted to provide relief to the landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulties. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the City Council shall evaluate the following criteria: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off-street parking. -1509- Page 13 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. Expansion Permit Considerations The applicant is seeking the expansion permit to add units within the existing footprint of the structure to the same 38 foot height as other portions of the building. This addition is a reasonable use of the multi -family property. The expansion within the existing footprint allows the preservation of additional open space on the site. The expansion of the structure within the same footprint will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Variances As seen in the CUP review above, the applicant requests the following variances from the provisions of the City Code: 1. A 7.1 foot variance for the west rear yard setback of 20 feet for the townhomes, allowing a setback of 12.9 feet. 2. A 14.5 foot variance for the townhouses' south yard along Balsam Road from the minimum townhouse street side yard setback of 30 feet, allowing a setback of 15.5 feet; 3. A 15.0 foot variance for the townhouses' south yard along Spruce Road from the minimum townhouse street side yard setback of 30 feet, allowing a setback of 15 feet. 4. A 16,878 square foot variance from the maximum hardcover of 24,441 square feet (30% x 81,470), allowing 41,319 square feet of hardcover on the property. 5. A 105,730 square foot variance from the minimum lot coverage by unit type of 187,200 square feet, allowing 66 units to be built on a 81,470 square foot lot; similarly, a 116,530 square foot variance from the minimum lot coverage for average units of 198,000 square feet (3,000 sq. ft./unit x 66 units), allowing 66 units to be built on 81,470 a square foot lot. 6. A 147 square foot variance from the minimum floor area of 640 square feet floor area for one -bedroom dwelling units, allowing 493 square feet for 1 one -bedroom dwelling unit; similarly, a 160 square foot variance from the minimum floor area of 640 square -1510- Page 14 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 feet floor area one -bedroom dwelling units, allowing 480 square feet for 3 one - bedroom dwelling units. 7. An 8 space variance from the minimum number of new parking spaces of 35 spaces (2.5 spaces per unit MF x 6 MF units + 2.0 spaces per unit for TH x 10 TH units), allowing for 27 new parking spaces; furthermore, a 16 indoor space variance from the minimum number of indoor parking spaces of 16 (1.0 indoor spaces per unit x 16 units), allowing for 0 indoor parking spaces. 8. A variance from parking area materials, allowing a portion of the parking area to be made out of pervious pavers. 9. A 5.0 foot variance for the north yard and the east yard from the minimum parking areas setback of 10 feet, allowing a setback of 5.0 feet. Variance Considerations The purpose of a Planned Development Area (PDA) is to allow flexibility for sites that may be difficult to develop due to physical constraints of the site or the desire to preserve open space or other natural resources. The subject property has such conditions that make a PDA appropriate for its development and require variances from the standards of the underlying zoning in order to develop effectively. City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: -1511- Page 15 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances Considerations The existing Indian Knoll Manor was developed with a CUP and variances related to the parking lot. As noted in the applicant narrative the project is proposed to facilitate the rehabilitation of the existing building and the diversification of affordable unit types. While economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties, the realities of financing affordable housing projects are a consideration for the variance requests. in their analysis the applicant determined that the addition of 16 units is needed to secure financing to rehab the existing building and ensure sufficient financing to perform ongoing maintenance. While the additional units were intended to be added to the existing building, it was determined that soil conditions do not support additional units in the structure. The applicant then secured the property at 5524 Spruce Road to increase the square footage of the project site and allow for the construction of the three bedroom townhomes. The layout of the site was limited by the easement for the overhead electric utility lines that is located between the building and the parking area. Due to this easement, the townhomes had to be placed near the rear of the property and along Spruce Road. The applicant has tried to balance separation between the townhomes, roadways, and structures on adjacent properties. Given the limited area of the site, the applicant is unable to provide as much parking as is required by City Code. The applicant submitted a parking study that found the existing parking supply is meeting the needs of peak demand at a rate of 0.8 spaces per unit. While the applicant cannot meet the parking required by code, the applicant is increasing the parking supply to a rate of 1.02 spaces per unit. Final Plat The applicant has requested concurrent review of the final plat. Planning Commission review of the final plat is not required. The applicant is advised that the City Council will not take action on the final plat until the Comprehensive Plan Amendment has been approved by the Metropolitan Council. -1512- Page 16 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 Determination that Proposed Property Conveyance is Consistent with Comprehensive Plan MS 462.356 requires that the Planning Commission review and make findings related to a proposed acquisition or disposal of publically-owned property. The proposed conveyance of the HRA parcel is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan as it facilitates the updating of Indian Knoll Manor and the proposed project, once completed, will add 16 units of affordable housing to the community. The project will also diversify the types of affordable housing by adding 10 three-bedroom townhome units. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff's recommendation for each application of the Indian Knoll Manor submittal package is provided below. Please note that the conditions proposed are preliminary and subject to change as review and discussion of the development project continues. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to authorize its submittal to the Metropolitan Council including waiver of adjacent governmental review, with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request. 2. No future approval of any rezoning, land use, or subdivision application is included as part of this action. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. Rezoning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the rezoning of 5524 Spruce Road from R-2, Two -Family Residential, to R-3, Multiple -Family Residential, with the following conditions: 1. Concurrent approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, preliminary plat, variance and expansion permit applications. 2. Payment of all related costs for the review of the rezoning application. 3. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. -1513- Page 17 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor —PC Report —June 7, 2016 This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed rezoning is compatible with the land uses surrounding the subject property. 2. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review. Major subdivision -Preliminary Plat Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the preliminary plat and a waiver to allow more than one (1) principal structure on the site, as submitted, with the following conditions: 1. Concurrent approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, conditional use permit, variance and expansion permit applications. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the preliminary plat application. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolutions(s) with Hennepin County. Applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 4. All city approvals should be contingent on receipt of applicable federal approvals in the RAD conversion process as well as other applicable local/state/federal approvals. 5. Applicant shall revise the height of this fence to between four and five feet to meet the limitations set forth in Sec. 129-317(c)(4). 6. All requirements of City Code Sec. 121-87(b) regarding title shall be met. 7. The building materials and color scheme shall be subject to review and acceptance by the City. 8. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 9. The MCES SAC charge for the project shall be determined as part of final plat which shall be the responsibility of the applicant. A MCES Sewer Availability Charge determination letter shall be provided by the applicant for the existing house/uses. 10. Sewer and watermain area trunk charges for the project shall be determined as part of the final plat. The current trunk charge for sewer and water, per unit, is $2000.00 each. 11. The park dedication fee amount shall be determined as part of the final plat as provided by City Code Sec. 121.121. -1514- Page 18 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 12. Sewer connection and water connection fees shall be determined as part of the final plat. The 2016 sewer connection and water connection fees are $240.00 each. 13. The need for a development agreement, or similar agreement, shall be determined as part of the City's consideration of the final plat. 14. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed preliminary plat is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for the type of development and use being proposed. 3. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety, or welfare of the community. Conditional Use Permit Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a PDA and multi -family with more than six units as submitted with the following conditions: 1. Concurrent approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat, variances, and expansion permit applications. 2. This conditional use permit is approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System: (to be inserted). 3. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the conditional use permit application. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 5. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. 6. The design and location of the ADA accessible parking stall(s) shall be subject to review and acceptance by the Building Official. 7. Additional conditions from Staff, the Planning Commission, and City Council. -1515- Page 19 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use of the site is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. 2. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for type of development and use being proposed. 3. The proposed development is providing adequate utilities and drainage. 4. The proposed development has sufficiently considered traffic impacts and access. 5. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. 6. The proposed project will provide 16 additional affordable units to Mound and will increase the mix of unit types with the addition of 10 three-bedroom units. Expansion Permit Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of an expansion permit to allow the construction of new units within the existing footprint on the 3`d and 4th stories up to the existing building height of 38 feet with the conditions outlined below: 1. Concurrent approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat, conditional use permit, and variance applications. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the expansion permit application. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 4. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan. 3. The construction of additional units within the existing footprint and up to the existing height of 38 feet is an efficient use of space on a limited site. -1516- Page 20 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 Variance Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the nine requested variances with the conditions outlined below: 1. Concurrent approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat, conditional use permit, and expansion permit applications. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the variance application. 3. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 4. Approval of the Amended Mound Comprehensive Plan by the Metropolitan Council. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. It is reasonable that the applicant seeks to continue to use the site for an affordable multi -family apartment and townhomes. 2. The use of the site for multi -family residential is in keeping with the land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. As a Planned Development Area, flexibility through variances is intended to achieve community goals and policies. 4. The variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 5. The applicant is limited in the layout of the site due to an existing easement for overhead electric transmission lines. 6. The applicant needs additional units in order to finance the proposed capital improvements to the existing Indian Knoll Manor and ongoing maintenance of the facility. 7. Soil conditions prevented the additional units from being constructed within the existing footprint of the building. 8. Site layout and design is influenced by a number of factors, including the site size, the existing location of Indian Knoll Manor, two roads and the need for three separate principal structures. -1517- Page 21 Aeon — Indian Knoll Manor — PC Report — June 7, 2016 Determination that Proposed Property Conveyance is Consistent with Comprehensive Plan As required by MS 462.356, Subd. 2, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the proposed conveyance of the HRA property as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: The proposed conveyance of the HRA parcel is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as it facilitates the updating of Indian Knoll Manor and the project, once completed, will adds 16 units of affordable housing to the community. The project will also diversify the types of affordable housing by adding 10 three- bedroom townhome units. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it is anticipated that the requests will be considered by the City Council at their lune 28, 2016 meeting. Public hearings are required for the rezoning, preliminary plat and conditional use permit and includes both publication and mailed notice as required by City Code. -1518- Page 22 seem Homes for Generations May 2, 2016 Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Re: Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Waiver of Adjacent Review and Comment Period Dear Ms. Smith: Aeon, a non-profit housing developer located in Minneapolis, was selected by the City of Mound i -lousing and Redevelopment Authority (MRA) in May 2015 to preserve and rehabilitate Indian Knoll Manor (]KM), an existing 50 -unit public housing community located at 2020 Commerce Blvd, Mound, MN 55364. Over the last. year, Aeon has worked in partnership with the HRA to secure funding for the project totaling approximately $13.1 Million and we are now ready to proceed with the entitlement process with the goal of breaking ground in the 41h Quarter of 2016. Due to soil conditions as well as a 50 -foot utility casement running through the center of the site, the original scope of work has been modified and now includes the purchase of the neighboring parcel located at 5524 Spruce Road. lKM is currently zoned R3 and the neighboring parcel at 5524 Spruce Road is currently zoned R2. As part of our entitlement package to the City of Mound, we are respectfully requesting that the two parcels be merged with a zoning of R3. Aeon currently has site control of both parcels. In reviewing the Metropolitan Council's website, we feel that the proposed zone change and subsequent Comprehensive Plan Amendment may qualify for a waiver of the review and comment period as the amendment involves a site of 40 acres or less, the project is only adding 16 total units, and the site is not within '/4 mile of an adjacent jurisdiction. Based on this criteria, we respectfully request that the City of Mound consider requesting a waiver of the review period for Indian Knoll Manor. Once completed, IKM will provide 66 units of high quality affordable housing in suburban Hennepin County through the preservation of 50 existing affordable units and the new construction of 16 affordable, units. We appreciate your consideration and if there are any questions regarding Aeon's proposal please feel free to contact me at (612) 746-0517 or email me at bhonk'ns�a aeoumn.org. Sincerely, Aeon By (Signature): Print Name/Title: B3 a Hopkins, 't Project Manager 901 North 3" Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-341-3146 612-341-4208F www.aeommn,org -1519- APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952472-0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No. City Council Date: Planning Commission Date: Applicant Info rtease tvve or Name Aeon Email bhopkins@aeonmmorg Address 901 N. 3rd Street, Ste 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone Home Work 612.746.0517 Fax 612.341.4208 FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING it is requested that Section 350: of the Mound Zoning Ordinance be amended as follows: N/A Reason for amendment N/A Zoning Amendment Information (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 5 -1520- FOR AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP / ZONING DISTRICT COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING It is requested that the property described below and shown on the attached site plan be rezoned from zone R2 to zone R3 Address & Address 5524 Spruce Road, Mound, MN 55364 Lot 2133 34 AND 35 Block 002 Legal of Subject Property Addition PID# Lake Side Park A L Crockers 1 st Div 13-117-24-32-0040 Current Zoning: R1 RIA R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) Owner of Name Daniel Iversen Email metrolakesmarina@hotmaiLcom Subject Site Address 7300 County Rd 26, Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone Home Work 612.210.9287 Fax Present Use of Non -homestead single family dwelling Property Reason for Merging property to neighboring 2020 Commerce Blvd for redevelopment and Amendment preservation of Indian Knoll Manor. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required bylaw. Applicants Signature Date 512 / IbI Owner's Signature Dan Iversen, owner of 5524 Spruce Road, provided signed letterauthor teizing submittal of applications. Zoning Amendment Information (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 5 -1521- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 Planning Commission Date City Council Date APPLICATION q4,,,,, J Case No. FEES MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION. CHECK BOX TYPE OF APPLICATION FEE X SKETCH PLAN REVIEW $200* X PRELIMINARY PLAT $350+$15 per lot* X FINAL PLAT $350+$15 per lot ` X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ PDA $350' X ESCROW DEPOSIT $5,000 X VARIANCE $200` X Expansion Permit $200 Zoning Amendment $350TOTAL $ 7,060 CALL THE MOUND PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO CONFIRM CURRENT FEES. PI FARF PRINT OR TYPE Major Subdivision Information (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 6 -1522- SubjectAddress 2020 Commerce Boulevard & 5524 Spruce Road Mound, MN 55364 PROPERTY INFO Name of Proposed Plat Indian Knoll Manor 2020: LOTS 23 2425 AND 26 BLK 1, LOTS 22 and 23 BLK 2, and that parto Lots 24 25 and 26 BLK2 Lot Block 5524:002 Subdivision EXISTING LEGAL 5�ND 35 R2R3 PID# 13-117-24-32-0030 and 13-117-24-32-0040 Zoning: R1 RIA B1 B2 B3 (Circleone) DESCRIPTION APPLICANT The applicant is: owner other Email bhopkins@aeommn.mg Aeon Name 901 N. Rd Street, Ste 150, Minneapolis, MN 55364 Address Phone Home Work 612.746.0517 Fax 2020: City of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority cat ennepausc e a.cttynoun on .com Name 5524Daniel Iversen Email metrolakesmanna@hotmail.com OWNER 2020:2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Address 5524: 7300 County Rd 26, Maple Plain, MN 55359 (if other than 2020: 952.472.0620 applicant) Phone Home Work 5524:612.210.9287 Fax Lames R. Hill, Inc. mhampton@jib nc.com Name Email SURVEYOR/ 2500 W. City Road 42, Suite 210, Burnsville, MN 55337 Address ENGINEER 612.214.1055 Fax 952.890.6244 Phone Home Work Major Subdivision Information (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 6 -1522- Description of Proposed Use: The development proposal calls for the merging of 2020 Commerce Blvd and 5524 Spruce Rd into a single R-3 Zoned property through a Planned Development Area (PDA). Indian Knoll Manor is currently 50 units. Two units will be demolished and 8 new units will be constructed for a total of 56 multifamily units. 10 new construction townhomes will be added to the site. EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. The proposal will add 15 new units to the site (18 new construction and demolition of 3 existing including SFD). Additional parking will be added to mitigate traffic and parking concerns. There are currently 40 parking spaces for 50 units (0.8 ratio), after completion there will be 67 spaces for 66 units (1.02 ratio). The building will be converted to non-smoking to eliminate smoke/odor. The parking lot will be lit but neighboring uses will be shielded from lights. If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ 13,100,000 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS: Number of Structures: s Number of Dwelling Units/Structure: 56, 4, 6 (66 total) Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: 1,245 sq. ft. Total Lot Area: 82,147 sq. ft. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? (X ) yes, ( ) no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Resolution No. 05-119 was adopted on August 23, 2005 and approved a CUP and variances for a parking lot expansion project at 2020 Commerce Blvd to include 41 outdoor spaces, a 24 foot drive aisle width and waiver of the parking lot fencing requirements. A parking stall variance was previously approved at 2020 Commerce Blvd in 1970 which allowed the construction of 16 stalls. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. I certify that all of the statements above and statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the information provided (including Section 121 of the Mound City Ordinance) and that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signature Date Dan Iversen, owner of 5524 Spruce Road, provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Mound HRA, owner of 2020 Commerce Blvd, provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Major Subdivision Information (1/14/2016) Page 6 of 6 -1523- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 aL 0 D 0 1 a W INRUNINOMI • Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Case No. Please It pe or rint the following information: Description of Proposed Use: The development proposal calls for the merging of 2020 Commerce Blvd and nd.com om 5524 Spruce Rd into a single R-3 Zoned property through a Planned Development Area (PDA). Indian Knoll Manor is currently, 50 units Two existing apart cent units ) ill bg demolished and 8 new apartment units will be constructed for a total of 56 apartment units. Additionally, 10 new construction townhomes will be added to the site. In total, 66 the completed project will result in 66 affordable units on the property. Conditional Use Permit Info (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 5 _15524_ PROPERTY Subject Address 2020 Commerce Boulevard & 5524 Spruce Road, Mound, MN 55364 Name of Business Indian Knoll Manor & private residence INFORMATION 2020: LOTS 23 24 25 AND 26 BLK 1, LOTS 22 and 23 BLK 2, and that part of Lots 24 25 and 26 BLK 2 Lot(s)5524: LOTS 21 33 34 AND 35 Block 5524: 002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2020:13-117-24-32-0030 Subdivision PID# 5524:13-117-24-32-0040 APPLICANT Theapplicantis:Omer —Other _X -Email bhookin s(a)aeommnorg Name Aeon Address 901 N 3rd Street, Suite 150 Phone Home Work612.746.0517 Cell E -Mail Address bhopkins(abaeommnoro pax 612.341.4208 2020: City of Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority 2020: catherinepauschecityofmo NamEmail 55247 metrolakesmarina hotmail. OWNER 2020:2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 (if other than applicant) Adoress5524 7300 County Rd 26 Maole Plain MN 55359 2020: 952.472.0620 Phone Home Work 5524: 612.210.9287 Cell Name Larry Prinds Cermak Rhoades Architects Email Iprinds(a7cermakrhoades com ARCHITECT, SURVEYOR, Address275 East 4th Street Suite 800 St. Paul, MN 55101 ell Fax 651.225.8720 Phone Office 651.556.8633 Cell. OR ENGINEER ZONING Circle: R-1 R -1A-2 R-3 B-1 B-2 B-3 DISTRICT Description of Proposed Use: The development proposal calls for the merging of 2020 Commerce Blvd and nd.com om 5524 Spruce Rd into a single R-3 Zoned property through a Planned Development Area (PDA). Indian Knoll Manor is currently, 50 units Two existing apart cent units ) ill bg demolished and 8 new apartment units will be constructed for a total of 56 apartment units. Additionally, 10 new construction townhomes will be added to the site. In total, 66 the completed project will result in 66 affordable units on the property. Conditional Use Permit Info (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 5 _15524_ Planning Commission Case No. EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts. The proposal will add 15 new units to the properties (18 new construction and demolition of 3 including SFD). Additional parking will be added to mitigate traffic and parking concerns. There are currently 40 parking spaces for 50 units (0.8 ratio), after completion there will be 67 spaces for 66 units (1.02 ratio). The building will be converted to non-smoking to eliminate smoke/odor. The parking lot will be lit but neighboring uses will be shielded from lights. If applicable, a development schedule shall be attached to this application providing reasonable guarantees for the completion of the proposed development. Estimated Development Cost of the Project: $ 13,100,000 Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? M yes, () no. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Resolution No. 05-119 was adopted on August 23, 2005 and approved a CUP and variances for a parking lot expansion project at 2020 Commerce Blvd to include 41 outdoor spaces a 24 foot drive aisle width and waiver of the parking lot fencing requirements. A parking stall variance was previously approved at 2020 Commerce Blvd in 1970 which allowed the construction of 16 stalls. Application must be signed by all owners of the subject property, or explanation given why this is not the case. �(cI ~ 4- Print Applicant's Name Applicant's Signat .,e Date Dan Iversen, owner of 5524 Spruce Road, provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date Mound HRA, owner of 2020 Commerce Blvd, provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Print Owner's Name Owner's Signature Date City Code Section 129-38 relating to Conditional Use Permits must be reviewed by the applicant. If applying for a two family dwelling, City Code Section 129-102 must be reviewed by the applicant. Conditional Use Permit Info (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 5 -1525- r nAL VARIANCE CITY OE MOUNC _- APPLICATION , 2415 Phone eWilshire Boulevard, 4 952-4772-0600 FAX 952-472-0620�® PP/� Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date City Council Date Please tvoe or print leoibly Case No. SUBJECT Address 2020 Commerce Boulevard & 5524 Spruce Road, Mound, MN 55364 2020: LOTS 23 24 25 AND 26 BLK 1, LOTS 22 and 23 BLK 2, and that part of Lots 24 25 and 26 BLK 2 PROPERTY Lot 5524: LOTS 21 33 34 AND 35 Block 5524: 002 LEGAL DESC. Subdivision 2020:13-117-24-32-0030 PID # 5524: 13-117-24-32-0040 Zoning: R1 RIA R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) 2020: City of Mound Housing an Re eve opment AuthoritY 2020: catherinepausche@cityofmound. PROPERTY Name 5524: Daniel Iversen Email 5524: metrolakesrnarina@hotmail.coff OWNER 2020: 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Address 5524:7300 County Rd 26, Maple Plain, MN 55359 2020: 952.472.0620 Phone Home Work 5524:612.210.9287 Fax Aeon bhopkins@aeommn.org APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER Address 901 N. 3rd Street, Ste 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 THAN OWNER) Phone Home Work 612.746.0517 Fax 612.341.4208 om Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (x) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Resolution No. 05-119 was adopted on August 23, 2005 and approved a CUP and variances for a parking lot expansion project at 2020 Commerce Blvd to include 41 outdoor spaces a 74 foot drive aisle width and waiver of thean rking lot fencing requirements. A parking stall variance was previously approved at 2020 Commerce Blvd in 1970 which allowed the construction of 16 stalls. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Please see attached narrative. Variance Information (1/1412016) Page 4 of 6 -1526- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (x). If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): Please see attached narrative. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Comer Lot Front Yard: ( N S E@) 57 (1.5x height) ft 22.83 existing ft. 34.17 ft Commerce Blvd Front -Side Yard: ( NOSE W ) 57 (1.5X height) ft 29.33 existing ft 27.67 ft Balsam Rd Side Yard: (©S E W) 38 (LOX height) ft 23.58 existing ft 14.42 ft. Rear Yard: ( N S�) 20 ff. 20 requested ft N/A ff. Townhomes Lakeside: (N S E W) N/A ft, fL ft. (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: 120 ft. 678.46 existing ft. N/A ft, Lot Size: Min 22,000 sq ft 83,376 sq ft N/A sq ftPrincipal Max 24,644430%) 19,433 N/A Hardcover: sidewalks, drives Max 32.858 (40%sq ft 21.833 Sq ft Sq ft Principal Structures = 23.65% and Drive, walkways, parking.= 26.5% 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulaions for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No (x). If no, specify each non -conforming use: Property is zoned R3 and allows multifamily up to 6 units. The existing multifamily building is 50 unit's. 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) topography (4 soil ( ) too small ()o drainage (X) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape (x) other: specify Please describe: The site is encumbered with a 50 foot wide Utility Easement in which no development can take place. Additionally, the soil conditions do not allow for vertical new construction on the existing building to four stories in all locations Due to high water table and proximity to Lake Minnetonka, storrnwater management and drainage is unique. Variance Information (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 6 _15.27_ Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No �). If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (x ), No ( ). If yes, explain: The Utility Easement is the result of placement of Electrical Transmission Lines. 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (x), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: Please see attached narrative for full description of requested Variances. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Dan Iversen, owner of 5524 Spruce Road, provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Owner's Signature Date Mound HRA, owner of 2020 Commerce Blvd, provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Applicant's Variance Information (1/14/2016) Page 6 of 6 -1528- Date VARIANCE APPLICATION 2020 Commerce Blvd and 5524 Spruce Road 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Indian Knoll Manor (IKM) is an existing 50 -unit affordable housing community located at 2020 Commerce Blvd. The proposal calls for the rehabilitation of the existing structure as well as the demolition of two one -bedroom apartment units and the new construction of 8 new apartment homes (four one -bedroom and four two-bedroom). Upon completion, there will be 56 affordable apartment homes attached to the existing structure. The additional apartments will be added to the first, second, third and fourth floors. The maximum building height will not be increased beyond the existing four stories. Additionally, Aeon has site control of 5524 Spruce Road and is proposing to merge the two properties together through a Planned Development Area and construct 10 new three-bedroom townhomes. The townhomes will be two stories and will serve families. The parking area will be expanded from 40 parking spaces (0.8 ratio) to 67 parking spaces (1.02 ratio). Requested Variances resulting from the proposed construction or alteration: City Code Sec. 129-103: Lot Coverage (C)(2)(a) Townhouse Minimum Lot Area: and (E)(2) — Multifamily Minimum Lot Area Requirements: Proposed: Four -Unit Townhouse Structure: Six -Unit Townhouse Structure: 4,500 SF/unit X 4 units = 18,000 SF 4,000 SF/unit X6 units= 24,000 SF Efficiency n e beGIFOOM units' 2;400 SF/Unit X 31 units ' 22,^nn SF Twe bedreem units; 4,560 SF{uait X S UP45 "— ,800 S€ Minimum average per unit Multifamily: 3,000 SF/unit X56 units= 168,000 SF Total: X 66 units = 210,000 SF Note: Minimum 3,000 SF per multifamily unit applied. The total lot area of 2020 Commerce Blvd and 5524 Spruce is 83,376 SF. The proposed unit mix is as follows: 16 Multifamily Efficiency Units 35 Multifamily One -Bedroom Units 5 Multifamily Tw-Bedroom Units 4 Units within a 4 -Unit Townhouse Structure 6 Units within a 6 -Unit Townhouse Structure 66 Total Units -1529- Narrative: Indian Knoll Manor, as currently constructed, is an existing non -conforming structure based upon the requirements listed above. The building would require 150,000 SF (50 units X 3,000 minimum per unit) of lot area to comply while 2020 Commerce Blvd is only 65,192 SF. The property at 5524 Spruce Rd was obtained to increase the square footage of the project site and allow for the construction of much needed affordable three-bedroom units. The 10 townhouse units, as well as the additional 6 apartment units being added to the existing structure, are necessary to ensure the long-term financial feasibility of the site and to allow for capital financing for the required renovations and rehabilitation of the existing units and common area. Without the additional 16 units, it would not have been possible to obtain the financing necessary to complete the proposed capital improvements to the building and perform ongoing maintenance. Due to the conditions above, a variance is requested for lot coverage. Setbacks (C)(2)(b)(1) Townhome Front Yard Setback (Corner Lot Side Yard) Requirements: Proposed: Narrative: Corner Lot Street Side Yard >81 Linear Feet: 30 feet Corner Lot Townhouse Street Side Yard >81 Feet (Balsam Rd): 15'-9" Corner Lot Townhouse Street Side Yard >81 Feet (Spruce Rd): 15'— 0 The site is encumbered by a 50 -foot wide utility easement in which no development can occur. Additionally, the existing soil conditions of the site do not allow for the building to structurally support 12 new apartment units as originally considered for the site. A total of 66 units is necessary for the financial feasibility of the project and generates the capital required to complete the rehabilitation and renovation of the existing building while allowing for sufficient cash flow to provide ongoing maintenance. To maintain the 66 -unit project without the ability to construct vertically upon the existing structure or into the area below the utility easement, the proposal calls for merging 5524 Spruce Road with 2020 Commerce Blvd and constructing 10 three-bedroom townhomes. There are currently 40 parking spaces for 50 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 0.8 spaces per unit. The proposed site plan increases the number of parking spaces to 67 spaces for 66 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 1.02 spaces per unit. -1530- A distance of 20'— 1" is provided between the four -unit townhome building and the six - unit townhome building to provide adequate pedestrian circulation. The utility easement, soil conditions, increased parking, distance between townhome buildings and need for 66 -units resulted in the location of the front porch of the four -unit townhome building fronting Spruce Road to be located 15'— 0" from the property line along Spruce Road and the side of the building to be located 15'— 9" from the property line along Balsam Road. The rear setback between the townhomes and the neighboring property at 5510 Spruce Road is 20'— 1" meeting the 20" required setback. There is currently no sidewalk running along Balsam Road or Spruce Road, and an additional buffer is provided between the Property Line and the street along both frontages, creating a distance from the curb to the front porches of the townhomes of 20' — 0" and the side of the townhomes of 20' — 9" for Spruce Road and Balsam Road, respectively. The total distance between the building face and the street along Spruce Road is 27'-8". Due to the conditions above, a variance is requested for the front yard setback Off -Street Parking (C)(2)(c) Off -Street Parking—Townhomes—Spaces per unit and (E)(4)(a) Off -Street Parking — Multifamily —Spaces per unit Requirement: Proposed: Narrative: Townhomes: 2 per unit w/ 1 indoors Multifamily: 2.5 per unit w/ 1 indoors Townhomes: 1.02 per unit w/ 0 indoors Multifamily: 1.02 per unit w/ 0 indoors There are currently 40 parking spaces for 50 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 0.8 spaces per unit. The proposed site plan increases the number of parking spaces to 67 spaces for 66 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 1.02 spaces per unit. The proposal extends the affordability of Indian Knoll Manor and provides capital improvements funded through a combination of low income housing tax credit equity, public sector soft debt, and a traditional mortgage. Per code, the proposal would need to provide 160 parking spaces, 66 of which are indoors. In order to provide 160 parking -1531- spaces and 66 units of affordable housing on an 83,000 SF parcel, either a subterranean garage or a parking structure would need to be constructed. The cost to construct 160 parking spaces would render the project infeasible given the funding available. To ensure that the proposed parking supply would meet future demand, a Parking Study was conducted for both existing and future conditions at the site. Current onsite parking at 2020 Commerce Blvd is provided at 0.8 spaces per unit. It was found that this provides 10 spaces greater than the peak observed demand and is adequate for the current building. We are proposing to increase the parking ratio to 1.02 spaces per unit (67 spaces/66 units) to accommodate the parking needs of the new units that are proposed for the site. The Parking Study found that the recommended parking supply for the future conditions of the site at peak demand is 64 spaces, and we propose supplying three spaces above that to provide 1.02 to 1 parking for residents. The Parking Study concluded that this amount of parking would adequately accommodate the expected future parking demand. Due to the conditions above, a variance is requested to allow for 67 total parking spaces (ratio of 1.02 spaces per unit). (E)(4)(d) Off -Street Parking- Multifamilv — Drive aisle width Requirement: Proposed: Narrative: All drive aisles to be at least 25 feet. Primary drive aisle will be 25 feet wide, rear drive aisles requested to be 23 feet wide. The site is encumbered by a 50 -foot wide utility easement in which no development can occur. Additionally, the existing soil conditions of the site do not allow for the building to structurally support 12 new apartment units as originally considered for the site. A total of 66 units is necessary for the financial feasibility of the project and generates the capital required to complete the rehabilitation and renovation of the existing building while allowing for sufficient cash flow to provide ongoing maintenance. To maintain the 66 -unit project without the ability to construct vertically upon the existing structure or into the area below the utility easement, the proposal calls for merging 5524 Spruce Road with 2020 Commerce Blvd and constructing 10 three-bedroom townhomes. There are currently 40 parking spaces for 50 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 0.8 spaces per unit. The proposed site plan increases the number of parking spaces to 67 spaces for 66 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 1.02 spaces per unit. A distance of 20'— 1" is provided between the four -unit townhome building and the six - unit townhome building to provide adequate pedestrian circulation. -1532- The utility easement, soil conditions, increased parking, distance between townhome buildings and need for 66 -units resulted in the need to decrease the parking aisle width from 25 feet to 23 feet for the two rear parking areas. The primary drive aisle will remain at a width of 25 feet. The parking width of 23 feet allows for a buffer of 10'— 5" between the parking area and the six -unit townhome building. This buffer allows for a full sidewalk and plantings to be included along the north side of the building creating a safe pedestrian walking path from the parking area and will connect to the other sidewalks provided along the parking lot edge adjacent to the townhomes. Additionally, the sidewalk will allow residents to easily access the rubbish containers located in the north east portion of the parking lot. Due to the conditions above, a variance is requested to allow for 23 foot drive aisles in the rear of the site. (E)(4)(e) Off -Street Parking— Multifamily— Parking area material Requirement: Proposed: Narrative: All parking areas to be concrete or blacktop. Pervious pavers throughout parking area. The pervious pavers are necessary due to the high water table and soil conditions. Our Civil Engineer has studied several alternatives to meet the requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The pervious pavers will work in partnership with raingardens located throughout the site to filtrate stormwater and meet MCWD requirements. Due to the conditions above, a variance is requested to allow for pervious pavers in the parking area in -lieu of concrete or blacktop. (E)(4)(g) Off -Street Parking - Multifamily — Distance between parking and public right-of-way Requirement: Proposed: There shall be no outdoor parking within 20 feet of public right-of-way. Parking along Balsam Road to be located 21' — 8" from street, but 16 feet from the property line. 1533- Narrative: There are currently 40 parking spaces for 50 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 0.8 spaces per unit. The proposed site plan increases the number of parking spaces to 67 spaces for 66 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 1.02 spaces per unit. In order to increase the number of parking spaces, while accounting for the unique site conditions (50 -foot wide utility easement, soil conditions, distance between townhome buildings and need for 66 -units), it is necessary to extend the parking area to within 16 feet of the property line along Balsam Road. Please note, the parking will be 21' — 8" from the actual street. Additionally, the current parking lot serving Indian Knoll Manor is located only 10 feet from the property line. The proposal will actually increase the distance between the parking and the public right-of- way. Due to the conditions above, a variance is requested for the distance between parking and the public right-of-way. IE)(4)(g) Off -Street Parking — Multifamily— Distance between parking and adioining lot Requirement: Proposed: Narrative: There shall be no outdoor parking within 10 feet of an adjoining lot. Parking along rear of site is located 5 feet from adjoining City -owned lot. Parking turnaround is located 5 feet from adjoining lot to the east; however parking spaces are located 10 feet from property line. There are currently 40 parking spaces for 50 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 0.8 spaces per unit. The proposed site plan increases the number of parking spaces to 67 spaces for 66 units, resulting in a parking ratio of 1.02 spaces per unit. In order to increase the number of parking spaces, while accounting for the unique site conditions listed above (50 -foot wide utility easement, soil conditions, distance between townhome buildings and need for 66 -units) resulted in the need to extend the parking area to within 5 feet of the adjoining City -owned lot in the rear of the site. Similarly, the turnaround area for the rear parking area is located 5 feet from the eastern property line, though the parking spaces are located 10 feet from the property line. The Parking Study completed for the site found a need for 64 parking spaces to meet future demand. Given the site conditions, it would not be possible to meet this parking demand if parking were not provided as currently proposed. The property will be fully landscaped and to create a buffer between the parking area and adjoining lot. -1534- Additionally, the adjoining lot is a vacant parcel owned by the City of Mound and utilized for stormwater run-off. Due to the conditions above, a variance is requested for the distance between parking and an adjourning lot. Townhome per Platted Lot (C)(2)(d) One Townhome per platted lot Requirement: Proposed: Narrative: There shall be only one townhome per platted lot. 10 townhomes within platted lot. As the 10 townhomes will be rental properties and due to the fact that Aeon will be the owner and manager of the property, with no intention of ever selling the property, we respectfully request a variance to allow for all 10 townhomes be permitted to be located on one plat map. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (X). If no, specify each non- conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc) The existing Indian Knoll Manor (IKM) building does not comply with the following regulations for the R3 zone: Buildina Height (E)(1)(a) Multifamily— Maximum building height Requirement: Existing: Narrative: Maximum of three stories or 35 feet The existing building has a maximum building height of four stories and 36'-2" The scope of work does not call for an increase to the existing maximum building height. New units will be constructed within the existing framework of the structure. The existing building height is not in conformance with the R3 standards, resulting in the need to request a variance to permit the maximum building height to remain at four stories and 36' — 7". -1535- Setbacks (E)(1)(c) Multifamily - Front Yard Setback (Corner Lot) Requirement Existing: Narrative: Front yard setback of 1.5 times the building height (38 X 1.5 = 57 feet) Commerce Blvd: Building is located 22' - 10" from property line Balsam Road: Building is located 29'-4" from property line The building setbacks along Commerce Blvd and Balsam Road will not be decreased as a result of the rehabilitation. As the building location currently does not conform to the R3 standards, a variance is requested to allow the continuation of the current building setback. (E)(1)(d) Multifamily Side Yard Setback Requirement Side yard setback of 1.0 times the building height (38 X 1.0 = 38 feet) Existing: Building is 23'-7" from the northern side yard property line. Narrative: The building setback along the northern property line will not be decreased as a result of the rehabilitation. As the building location currently does not conform to the R3 standards, a variance is requested to allow the continuation of the current building setback. LotCoveraae (E)(2) — Multifamily Minimum Lot Area Requirement Existing: Narrative: Minimum 3,000 square feet per unit: 50 x 3,000 = 150,000 sf required. 2020 Commerce Blvd is 65,192 square feet. The property at 5524 Spruce Rd was obtained to increase the square footage of the project site and allow for the construction of much needed affordable three-bedroom units. The 10 townhouse units, as well as the additional 6 apartment units being added to -1536- the existing structure, are necessary to ensure the long-term financial feasibility of the site and to allow for capital financing for the required renovations and rehabilitation of the existing units and common area. Without the additional 16 units, it would not have been possible to obtain the financing necessary to complete the proposed capital improvements to the building and perform ongoing maintenance. Unit Composition Requirement Existing: Narrative: No more than 20 percent of any building shall be efficiency units 32% of units are currently efficiencies (16 / 50 = 32%) Two additional one -bedroom units and four additional two-bedroom units will be added to the existing building to decrease this percentage of efficiencies to 28.5%. No new efficiencies will be added. Even with the decrease in the percentage of efficiency units, the building will not conform with the R3 standards, resulting in the need for a variance request. -1537- r ... r'ITY QF MQUNQ� 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 553 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 4Y Q3 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No. Please tvve or print legibiv 0 SUBJECT Address 2020 Commerce Blvd & 5524 Spruce Rd, Mound, MN 55364 2020: LOTS 23 24 25 AND 26 BLK 1, LOTS 22 and 23 BLK 2, and that part of Lots 24 25 and PROPERTY LEGAL Lot 5524: LoTs 21 3134 AND 35 Block 5524: 002 DESC. Subdivision PID# 2020: 13-117-32-0030;5524:13-117-32-0040 Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 81 B2 B3 (Circle one) 2020: City of Mound HRA mcatherepaushe@cityofmound.com PROPERTY Name Email 5524: 1 Jamel Iversen me ro a esmarina@Hottnali.com OWNER Address 2020: 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364 5524: 7300 County Rd 26, Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone Home Work 2020: 952.472.0620 Fax APPLICANT Name Aeon Email bhopkinsaeommn.org (IF OTHER Address 901 N. 3rd Street, Ste 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 THAN OWNER) Phone Home Work 612.746.0517 Fax 612.341.4208 Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (X) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Resolution No. 05-119 was adopted on August 23, 2005 and approved a CUP and variances for a parking lot expansion project Z6 BLK 2 at 2020 Commerce Blvd to include 41 outdoor spaces, a 24 foot drive aisle width and waiver of the parking lot fencing requirements. A parking stall variance was previously approved at 2020 Commerce Blvd in 1970 which allowed the construction of 16 stalls. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Indian Knoll Manor (IKM) is currently comprised of 50 multifamily residential units. The proposal calls for the demolition of 2 one -bedroom units and the new construction of four two-bedroom units and four one -bedroom resulting in a total of 56 units after completion. The maximum building height will not be increased as units will be added Expansion Permit Information to the existing first, second, third and fourth stories. The footprint will expand by approximately (1114/2016) Page 4 of 6 367 square feet to account to-.15,3.8rlacement of a stack of one -bedroom units with two-bedroom units in the northeast portion of the building. Case No. 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. 2020 Commerce Blvd is a corner lot with lot width exceeding 81 feet on both Commerce Blvd and Balsam Rd therefore, a required front yard setback equal to the greater of 30 feet or 1.5 times building height was assumed for Commerce Blvd and Balsam Road. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION Comer Lot (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E(q) 57 (1.5X height 22.83 existing ft, 0 ft. Commerce Front Side Yard: ( N S@E W ) 57 0.5X height)t. 29.33 existing ft. 0 ft. Balsam Side Yard: (DS E W) 38 (LOX height ft. 23.58 existing ft 0 ft Rear Yard: ( N S(E)W) 20 ft. 20 (requested) ft. 0 ft. Townhomes Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. (NS EW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: 120 ft. 678.46 existing ft 0 ft Lot Size: 22,000 sq ft 82,147 sq ft 15,400 sq ft adding 5524 Spruce 32,858 41,266 8,182 367ansionilding Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ft p 7,815 new TH 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No (X). If no, specify each non -conformity: Existing building does not conform with front or side yard setbacks for a comer lot, height, off-street parking lot area or required percentage of efficiency units. 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: ( ) too narrow ( ) topography (X) soil ( ) too small (X) drainage (X) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ()) other: specify Please describe: The site is encumbered with a 50 foot wide Utility Easement in which no development can take place. Additionally, the soil conditions do not allow for vertical new construction on the existing building to four stories in all locations. Due to high water table and proximity to Lake Minnetonka, stormwater management and drainage is unique. Expansion Permit Information (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 6 -1539- Case No. 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No (X ). If yes, explain: 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes (X ), No ( ). If yes, explain: Easement is the result of placement of Electrical Transmission Lines. 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes (X), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: Additional details regarding the current non -conforming conditions of the site are provided within an attachment to the Variance Application. I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Dan Iversen, owner of 5524 Spruce Road, provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Owner's Signature Date Mound HRA, owner of 2020 Applicant's Expansion Permit Information (111 412 0 1 6) Page 6 of 6 provided signed letter authorizing submittal of applications. Date �Z A1C _ -1540- MOUND HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY INDIAN KNOLL MANOR APARTMENTS 2020 COMMERCE BLVD. MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 April 28, 2016 Mr. Blake Hopkins Aeon 901 N. 3rd Street Suite 150 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Dear Blake, On April 12, 2016, representatives from Aeon presented an update on the Indian Knoll Manor RAD conversion, including the funding status, current site plan and preliminary planning review comments from Community Development Director Sarah Smith. The HRA Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to direct Aeon and staff to move forward with the local development application review process, including City of Mound Planning Commission and City Council land -use approvals, as well as an other applications necessary with other public agencies, with respect to the development of 2020 Commerce Boulevard and the adjacent 5524 Spruce sRoad. ' Please consider this the HRA's consent, as current owner of 2020 Commerce Boulevard, to move forward with the application process. Sincerely, G. - Eric Hovers e Executive Director -1541- c ,a.. A le n, Hames for Generations March 24, 2016 Daniel A. Iversen 4850 Edgewater Drive Mound, MN 55364 Re: 5524 Spruce Road, Mound, MN 55364 — permission to Submit Land Use Applications Dear Dan: As part of Aeon's efforts to revitalize the existing Indian Knoll Manor apartments building and incorporate the site located at 5524 Spruce Road into the project scope, we will need to submit several planning applications to the City of Mound. In order to keep our project schedule, we will need to submit these applications prior to the closing date for the purchase of 5524 Spruce Road As a result, Aeon cannot submit applications to the City of Mound without the current owner's permission. Please acknowledge that Aeon has your permission to submit any planning related documents and applications to the City of Mound for the development of 5524 Spruce Road by signing below. Any and all cost related to this activity will be paid by Aeon, and no additional cost will be incurred by you. If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to call me directly at (612) 74(}0517 Sincerely, Aeon By (Signature): Print Name/"Title: Blake l lopkms, Sr. Project er Acknowledged and Approved by: Daniel A. Iversen Current Owner of 5524 Spruce Road, Mound, MN 55364 901 North 3" Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-341-3148 612-341-4208F www.aeommn.org -1542- CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING REQUIREMENTS The City Code requires that a City Council public hearing is required for review of preliminary plat, rezoning and conditional use permit applications. The public hearing notice was published in the Laker on June 18, 2016 and posted on the City Hall bulletin board on June 14, 2016. The public hearing notice was mailed to all affected property owners located within 350 feet of the subject properties on June 16, 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their June 7, 2016 meeting. A public hearing was held for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Plat. A number of neighborhood residents attended and expressed concern about the project. Particular concerns raised were regarding the removal of the trees buffering this property from their neighborhood, the proximity of the townhomes to their properties, the placement of the dumpster near the eastern property line, and the amount of parking provided. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. It should be noted that at the Planning Commission meeting the applicant clarified that two additional variances were requested. One is to allow the drive aisles to be 23 feet instead of the requested 25 feet. As noted in the Planning Report, a CUP and variance to allow 24 foot drive aisles was previously granted in 2005. The second would be to allow the privacy fence on the eastern property line to be 6 feet instead of 5 feet. The height of the fence was requested the adjacent property owners in a neighborhood meeting earlier this year. After an in-depth discussion regarding the project the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Major Subdivision -Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, and Expansion Permit applications. The Planning Commission also found that the proposed conveyance of public property was in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the conditions recommended by Staff, the Planning Commission requested the applicant review the site plan to see if another location for the dumpster could be found. The Planning Commission also requested the applicant to research whether parking limitations for tenants could be established to address parking concerns. The applicant has requested 11 variances as part of the Planned Development Area (PDA). As members may recall, Planned Development Areas are established to allow flexibility to unique site and building characteristics that may require variances and variations from the zoning and subdivision regulations. The Planning Commission recommended approval of 8 out of the 11 variances requested by the applicant for this project. The Planning Commission specifically recommended denial of the following three variances requested by the applicant: 1. The A 7.1 foot variance for the west rear yard setback of 20 feet for the townhomes, allowing a setback of 12.9 feet. 2. A 5.0 foot variance for the north yard and the east yard from the minimum parking areas setback of 10 feet, allowing a setback of 5.0 feet. 3. A 2.0 foot variance from the 25 -foot minimum drive aisle size, allowing drive aisles of only 23 feet. -1466- A aeon Home Changes Everything 4) E,%p lore whether rite design changes could eliminate weed for valiance for drive aide. Aeon could eliminate the drive aisle variance, but in order to achieve this and maintain the walkway directly north of the townhomes, a 0 foot lot line variance would be required along the northern lot line adjacent to the city owned parcel. This would allow a buffer to remain between the northern portion of the townhomes and the parking lot, with area for a sidewalk and landscaping. Please see site plan. 5) I;af lore alternatives to eliminate variance #1 aizd #9 included in Planning Rej ort doted (acne 2, 2016 Z A 7.1 foot variance for the west rear _pard setback of 20 feet for the townhomes, allowing a setback of 12.9 feet An alternative to eliminate this variance is to remove the small concrete stoops on the back of the northernmost townhomes. By removing the stoops, the setback is 20'. Please see site plan. 9, A 5.0 foot variance for the north yard and the east yard from the minimum parking areas setback of10 feet, allowing a setback of5.0 feet. A 0 foot setback for the north yard is requested in order to increase the drive aisle to 24 feet and not push the townhomes and parking lot closer together. An east yard setback of 10 feet, and in some places 15 feet, can be achieved. Increasing this east yard setback though requires removing landscape barriers within the parking lot that break up and soften the parking lot. Please see site plan. 6) Prov de additional e foerzat ort related to nal zanrn for fenie Iiaig/�t Stemming from the neighborhood meeting Aeon held, the increased height of the fence from 5 feet to 6 feet along the eastern side of the property will provide additional privacy for the neighbors. The requested variance would be to provide privacy and minimize noise between Indian Knoll Manor and the adjacent properties. 901 North 3i° Street, Suite 150, Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-34 1 -3 148 612-341.4208F www.aeon mn.org To: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director From: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Date: May 24, 2016 Subject: RAD Conversion of Indian Knoll Manor Background In 1970, the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) signed a contract with HUD to build Indian Knoll Manor for elderly and handicapped citizens. Through reforms, public housing is now open to individuals and families who meet the income thresholds. Indian Knoll Manor and many other affordable units in the city help to achieve Mound's Comprehensive Plan objective to maintain and continue life -cycle housing for all income levels. There are currently 50 units at Indian Knoll, including 16 studios, 33 1 -bedrooms, and a 2 -bedroom unit. Units are approximately 370-480 square feet in size, which is just below HUD's maximum size of 540 square feet for affordable housing. In 2008, the Mound HRA began to look at options for Indian Knoll Manor as HUD's regulatory requirements continued as funding diminished. While determined to keep the building affordable, deferred capital needs became apparent that would not be satisfied by the projected level of HUD funding. In recent years, capital grants were used to help subsidize the cuts in the operating subsidies. HUD created the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Project which allows public housing properties to convert to long-term Section 8 rental assistance contracts, and Indian Knoll was approved for this program in 2015. RAD provides flexibility in ownership and financing alternatives and is a central part of HUD's rental housing preservation strategy, which works to preserve the nation's stock of deeply affordable rental housing, promote efficiency within and among HUD programs, and build strong, stable communities. Partnership with Aeon As part of the RAD conversion process, the Mound HRA chose Aeon to be its development partner and ultimately assume ownership of Indian Knoll Manor. The Mound HRA approved a tentative purchase agreement with Aeon to set in motion the process to secure alternative funding/grants for the rehabilitation of Indian Knoll Manor. Other significant events are summarized on the attached timeline. On April 12, 2016, the Mound HRA voted unanimously to authorize Aeon to proceed with the public input process and begin the local development application review process, which includes Planning Commission and Council land -use approvals and any other applicable public agency approvals (i.e., MCWD, Metropolitan Council, etc.). The current plan includes acquisition of the neighboring parcel and an addition of 16 units, 6 of which will be added to the existing building and 10 separate 3 -bedroom townhomes. It is important to note that without the additional units, the project would have operated at an increasing deficit in years 1 through 15 and would not have scored well in the competitive funding applications. Aeon has succeeded in obtaining millions of dollars in funding to make this project a reality and has found a way to make the project break even while improving the quality of the property and services for the long term. -1590- Indian Knoll Manor RAD Conversion/Rehab and Addition Timeline March 12, 2014 RES 14-03H Mound HRA authorizes the Executive Director to execute a Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Program application with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and certifying an agreement to comply with all requirements of the program and PIH Notice 2012-32. March 25, 2015 HUD issues a Commitment to Enter into a Housing Assistance Payment (CHAP) for a Rental Assistance Demonstration Project at Indian Knoll Manor March 31, 2015 A Request for Qualifications and Interest in the Purchase of Indian Knoll Manor Apartments is issued seeking qualified non-profit development partners/long-term operators April 28, 2015 RES 15-06H Mound HRA appoints Aeon as the RAD Development Partner and ultimate owner of Indian Knoll Manor June 9, 2015 Mound HRA approves a purchase agreement between the Mound HRA and Aeon for Indian Knoll Manor that will facilitate Aeon's ability to submit competitive alternative funding applications June'15 - April '16 Aeon applies for and is granted multiple funding sources for the project, including the primary funding by Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), Hennepin County and Metro HRA. Project fully funded by April 2016. April 7, 2016 Aeon signs a purchase agreement to aquire 5524 Spruce Road with the intention of expanding development area. April 12, 2016 Mound HRA Board of Commissioners directs Aeon to proceed with land use applications and stakeholder meetings. April 21, 2016 Third meeting held with Indian Knoll Manor residents to discuss proposed project (occupied rehab) and additional units. April 28, 2016 Neighborhood meeting held with property owners within 350 feet of Indian Knoll to discuss proposed project and additional units. July 1, 2016 Aeon will contract with Mound HRA to provide property management services on a month to month basis until closing in order to facilitate a smooth transition. Fall, 2016 Anticipated closing date for property to transfer Aeon and construction to begin. -1591- Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. To: Aubrie Gould, Aeon From: Ed Terhaar, P.E. Date: March 28, 2016 Subject: Parking Study for Indian Knoll Manor in Mound, MN PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND This memorandum presents the results of our parking study for the Indian Knoll Manor apartment building in Mound, MN. Aeon is proposing to purchase and rehab the existing 50 unit apartment building, including constructing additional dwelling units and parking on site. Parking usage data was collected at the Indian Knoll Manor site, as well as two other Aeon apartment sites in Chaska. This study was undertaken to review the adequacy of the proposed parking supply relative to the expected future parking demand. EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS The Indian Knoll Manor apartment building is located in the northeast quadrant of the Commerce Boulevard/Balsam Road intersection in Mound. The existing building contains 50 apartment units, with a total of 51 bedrooms. During the parking survey period, 48 units with 49 bedrooms were rented and occupied. The site includes 40 off-street parking stalls located behind the building. The Landing Apartments building is located in Chaska in the southeast quadrant of the Chestnut Street/E. 1s' Street intersection. The existing building contains 54 units, all of which are one bedroom units. During the parking survey period, 54 units with 54 bedrooms were rented and occupied. The site includes 54 total parking spaces, with a combination of on -street and off-street spaces. The Clover Field Marketplace apartment building is located at 2915 Clover Ridge Drive in Chaska. The existing buildings contain 117 units, with a total of 233 bedrooms. During the parking survey period, 112 units with 226 bedrooms were rented and occupied. The site includes a total of 217 parking spaces, with a combination of on -street and off-street spaces. The off-street spaces are located in an underground garage that has a total of 150 spaces. During the parking survey period, 94 of the underground parking stalls were rented by residents. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project at Indian Knoll Manor will result in a total of 56 apartment units and 10 townhouse units with a total of 91 bedrooms. The site will include 66 off-street parking stalls. wenck Associates, Inc. 1 1800 Pioneer Creek Center I P.O. Box 249 1 Maple Plain, MN 55359-0249 Toll Free 800-472-2232 ..Main 763 -479 -4201.1591 -ill wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.corn ,. iPl...: AGould WENCK Aeon on March 28, 2016 aespomive paroner. Exceptional outcomes. PARKING SURVEY DATA Existing Parking Supply and Demand Parking usage surveys were performed for the three existing apartment building properties in March, 2016. Parking usage data was collected for each property on a typical weekday and a Saturday during the morning and afternoon time periods. The results of the parking survey and occupancy percentages for each property are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Existing Parkino Usage Results Date Time Total Spaces Used Total Spaces Available Percentage Used Indian Knoll Manor Thursday 3/10/16 7:15 am 26 40 650% Thursday 3/10/16 1:15 prn 25 40 63% Saturday 3/12/16 6:45 am 26 40 65% Saturday 3 12 16 1:00 pm 23 40 58% Monday 3/14/16 6:40 pm 27 40 68% Tuesday 3/15/16 7:20 am 30 40 75% Wednesday 3/16/16 7:40 am 27 40 68% Wednesday 3/16/16 5:00 prn 21 40 53% Thursday 3/17/16 7:20 am 27 40 68% Thursday 3/17/16 6:40 prn 24 40 60% Friday 3/18/16 6:50 am 30 40 75% Wednesday 3/23/16 8:15 am 25 40 63% The Landing Tuesday 3/15/16 7:15 am 37 54 69% Tuesda 3/15/16 2:15 pm 32 54 59% Saturday 3/19/16 7:00 am 42 54 78% Saturday 3/19/16 12:30 prn 36 54 67% Wednesday 3/23/16 7:30 am 35 54 65% Clover Field Marketplace Tuesday 3/15/16 7:30 am 94 217 43% Tuesday 3/15/16 2:30 prn 63 217 29% Saturday 3/19/16 7:20 am 132 217 61% Saturday 3/19/16 12:45 pm 97 217 45% Wednesday 3/23116 7:20 am 97 217 45% -1592- Aubrie Gould Aeon March 28, 2016 e ENC aesponslve partner. Exceptional outcomes. For each property, the peak number of spaces used per occupied unit and per occupied bedroom was calculated using the parking survey data. The results are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Peak Spaces Used Per Occupied Unit and Bedroom Location Peak Spaces Used per Occupied Unit Peak Spaces Used per Occupied Bedroom Weekday Indian Knoll Manor 0.63 0.61 The Landing 0.69 0.69 Clover Field Marketplace 0.87 0.43 Indian Knoll Manor 61 56 All Three Properties 0.77 0.50 Saturday Indian Knoll Manor 0.54 0.53 The Landing 0.78 0.78 Clover Field Marketplace 1.2 0.58 All Three Properties 0.93 0.61 Future Parking Demand and Supply The estimated future parking demand and recommend parking supply for the proposed Indian Knoll Manor project were determined using the peak parking usage data for the three surveyed properties in Table 2. As described earlier, the proposed project will result in 66 dwelling units with 91 bedrooms. The resultant parking demand estimates are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Estimated Peak Parking Demand Location Peak Parking Demand for Number of Units Peak Parking Demand for Numbers of Bedrooms Weekday Indian Knoll Manor 51 46 Saturday Indian Knoll Manor 61 56 Standard parking analysis calculations include a design safety factor that is applied to the peak parking demand to account for parking space turnover, vehicles using two spaces, peak surges, etc. A design safety factor of 5 percent is used for this purpose. Therefore, the peak parking demand would be 5 percent greater than the calculated peak. The estimated peak parking demand on a weekday ranges from 46 to 51 stalls and on Saturday ranges from 56 to 61 stalls. The recommended parking supply is 64 spaces, or 61 * 1.05. The proposed parking supply is 66 spaces, or 2 spaces greater than the peak demand. Therefore, the proposed parking supply is expected to be adequate for the future parking demand. -1593- Aubrie Gould E Aeon NCK March 28, 2016 Responsive partner. E csptonal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the information presented in this memorandum, we have made the following conclusions and recommendations: • The existing parking supply at Indian Knoll Manor is 40 spaces, or 10 spaces greater than the peak observed demand. Adequate parking is provided for the existing conditions. Parking usage data collected at The Landing Apartments and Clover Field Marketplace indicates that both facilities have adequate parking under existing conditions. • The estimated peak parking demand at Indian. Knoll Manor on a weekday ranges from 46 to 51 stalls and on Saturday ranges from 56 to 61 stalls. The recommended parking supply is 64 spaces, or 61 * 1.05. The proposed parking supply is 66 spaces, or 2 spaces greater than the peak demand. • Based on the information and calculations presented in this report, the future parking supply will adequately accommodate the expected future parking demand. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota, DATE: March 28 2016 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 -1594- Hennepin County Public Works Transportation Department James N. Grube P.E., County Highkiay Engineer 612596 0300, Phone 1.600 Prairie Drive 612321-34]0, Fax Medina, Minnesota 55310 we, hennepin.us/transportation Ms. Sarah Smith May 12, 2016 Community Development Director City of Mound Re: Final Plat Review - Indian Knoll Manor 2415 Wilshire Boulevard 2020 Commerce Blvd. & 5524 Spruce Rd. Mound, MN 55364 Hennepin County Plat Review ID #3506 Dear Ms. Smith: Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03, and 462.358, Plats and Surveys, allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads. The preliminary and final plat for Indian Knoll Manor was received by Hennepin County on May 6, 2016. This plat proposes to merge the existing parcel at 2020 Commerce Boulevard (CSAH 110) with the adjacent 5524 Spruce Road vacant property in order to accommodate the construction of 10 townhome units. The existing property will add 6 apartments to the existing 50 -unit structure. The Hennepin County Plat Review Committee discussed this proposal on May 10, 2016 and have provided the following comments: Access - This plat will continue to utilize the existing internal driveway via Balsam Road. Hennepin County staff anticipate minimal impact to County Road 110. Right -of -Way - County staff believe the existing 80 feet of right-of-way along this corridor will be sufficient to accommodate future roadway needs as well as an off-road trail along the western side of County Road 110. Permits - Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right-of-way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to driveway and street access, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Permit questions can be directed to Steve Groen at (612) 596-0337 or steven,groen@hennepin,us. Please contact Bob Byers (612) 596-0354, robertbyers@hennepin us or Jason Gottfried (612) 596-0394, iason goQftied@hennepin.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, 1-411 James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation and County Engineer JNG/jdg cc: Plat Review Committee Mark Larson, Hennepin County Survey Office -1595- 462.356 PROCEDURE TO EFFECT PLAN: GENERALLY. Subdivision l.Recommendations for plan execution. Upon the recommendation by the planning agency of the comprehensive municipal plan or sections thereof, the planning agency shall study and propose to the governing body reasonable and practicable means for putting the plan or section of the plan into effect. Subject to the limitations of the following sections, such means include, but are not limited to, zoning regulations, regulations for the subdivision of land, an official map, a program for coordination of the normal public improvements and services of the municipality, urban renewal and a capital improvements program. Subd. 2.Compliance with plan. After a comprehensive municipal plan or section thereof has been recommended by the planning agency and a copy filed with the governing body, no publicly owned interest in real property within the municipality shall be acquired or disposed of, nor shall any capital improvement be authorized by the municipality or special district or agency thereof or any other political subdivision having jurisdiction within the municipality until after the planning agency has reviewed the proposed acquisition, disposal, or capital improvement and reported in writing to the governing body or other special district or agency or political subdivision concerned, its findings as to compliance of the proposed acquisition, disposal or improvement with the comprehensive municipal plan. Failure of the planning agency to report on the proposal within 45 days after such a reference, or such other period as may be designated by the governing body shall be deemed to have satisfied the requirements of this subdivision. The governing body may, by resolution adopted by two-thirds vote dispense with the requirements of this subdivision when in its judgment it finds that the proposed acquisition or disposal of real property or capital improvement has no relationship to the comprehensive municipal plan. -1596- PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 12, 2016 The Mound Parks and Open Spaces Commission met on Thursday, May 12, 2016, at 7:0O'p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Present: Chair Travis Mills, Commissioners Derek Goddard and Linda Corde, Council Representative Heidi Gesch Absent: Commissioner Shawn Seiler Others Present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten, Parks Worker Gavin Ball Public Present: none 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. 2. Oath of Office by City Manager Eric Hoversten A. Commissioner Linda Cordie City manager Eric Hoversten swore in Linda Cordie as new Parks and Open Space commissioner. 3. Roll Call 4. Approval of Agenda MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Mills, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 5. Approval of April 14, 2016, Minutes MOTION by Gesch, seconded by Mills, to approve minutes of April 14, 2016 regular meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 6. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present: None 7. Parks Tour Findings Commissioners summarized their findings from their inspections of the parks. Overall, all parks were in pretty good shape. The topic of warning signs on play structures was discussed. Ball says that there is a sticker on the bottom of the posts. However, Ball stated that Minnesota doesn't require any postings on play structures. Hoversten shared that on Mound's ball fields, the school marks the fields for games. Some residents ask about this. Highland End park - Hoversten reported that in the winter, this park has a nice sliding slope. Snowmobiles come on/off lake at this park. Each year, the city creates a lane with orange -1597- Mound POSC Meeting Minutes May 12, 2016 fencing that separates the sliders from the snowmobilers. The city would like to put up a permanent split rail fence for delineation purposes. This eliminates the annual labor burden of putting up and taking down the orange fencing. Gesch suggested the city asks the snowmobile club to help defray the costs for this fencing as the club would benefit from the fencing. Gesch commented that the parks aren't wheelchair accessible due to the lip edging around the play structures. Ball will take a look at these and see what can be done to make them more accessible for all. Suggestion was made by several commission members to add benches to the parks. Hoversten mentioned that at Surfside Park, there are currently two picnic tables and two barbecue grills. Hoversten would like to add three more grills and tables, group them in timber trimmed crushed rock pads, thereby totaling five individual areas for people to grill and picnic. Hoversten asked the commission to think about how the parks can be enhanced in a simple way that doesn't really hit the budget. 8. Gavin Ball. Citv of Mound Parks worker. presentation of proposal for edible ereen space at Three Points Park A. Why an edible park and what it can provide to an otherwise unused space B. Planting locations C. Trees removed D. Signage and policy concerning consumption of vegetables E. Cost Ball presented plan for edible green space at Three Points Park. Ball envisions this park to encourage those people who wouldn't otherwise use a park, to be drawn in with the edibles. Ball proposed areas at Three Points park where he would plant apple trees and raspberry bushes. Also, cedar planter boxes for volunteers to plant an edible garden. Signage for the park would inform people of the rules of garden - eat only what you can consume on -sight, not harvest to take home. Gesch was concerned about communication with the neighbors when the trees were being taken out. Gesch feels that the city should let the neighbors know that other trees will be replacing them. 9. Tennis Court Reconstruction Project Discussion Mills updated commission on plans for tennis court reconstruction. Hoversten and Mills met and agreed that the court needs to be totally reconstructed. Mills will work on writing the grant in the off-season. 10. Discussion on Adopt A Green Space Program - update on brochures and other collateral Gesch met with Mary Mackres and reviewed various forms for Adopt A Green Space program. Gesch distributed the spreadsheet reflecting which park areas are available for adoption. Each commissioner is encouraged to adopt an area. Mound POSC Meeting Minutes May 12, 2016 Cordie asked how the program would be communicated? Gesch advised that the brochures would be given to different plant shops. Cordie suggested that a commission member show up at the upcoming Plant Swap on May 21 to solicit volunteers. Gesch volunteered to be there. Reports: City Council Representative Gesch reported that Seiler came to the recent city council meeting to propose starting a Mound Facebook page, to help with promoting Adopt A Green Space program and other city events. Discussion from the council was not favorable for the city to have a Facebook page. However, Council Member Gillispie suggested that Mound could utilize Westonka Community and Commerce (WCC) and partner with that group to post events or programs on the WCC Facebook page. Commissioner Comments - none offered 11. Adiourn MOTION by Mills, seconded by Gesch, to adjourn at 8:50 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Submitted by: Mary Mackres -1599- June 17, 2016 Dear County Official: Theresa Sunde Government Relations Manager Mediacom Communications is making these channels available to our customers on or around July 2011 for $9.99 each. Channel Name Location Type Description RTL International 961 German Soaps and Series TV5 Monde 963 French Saturday night movies RAI International 966 Italian News, Italian movies and soap operas Russian TV Network 968 Russian Nightly newscast Channel One 969 Russian Movies, news, game shows, children's programs, comedy, and talk shows The Filipino Channel 972 Filipino New films from Sky Cinema tvkl 975 Korean News, dramas, movies, sports, business, health, music, children's, game shows, Saigon Broadcasting SBTN 976 Vietnamese 24 hour primarily Vietnamese programming Star India Plus 978 South -Asian Films and Music Star India Gold 979 South -Asian Popular drama series Life OK 980 South -Asian. News in 3 languages Mediacom customers may call 866-609-6180 for more information. Should you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 507-837-4878 or email me at tsunde@mediacomcc.com. Sincerely, 1;—emdrrchit<t/e Mediacom Communications Corporation 1504 2nd Street SE, '-1600-3, Minnesota 56093 EXISTING SIDI NEW CONCRE SIDEWALK, T RELOCATED: NEW MONUM BIKE RACK, T EXISTING LIGI WALLMOUNI LIGHT, TYPIC) EXISTING FLA RELOCATED N SITE PLAN - ORIGINAL PR 1" = 20'-0" ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 a STRUCTURE E, SEE 8 / A1.1 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS EXISTING SIDI NEW CONCRE SIDEWALK, T RELOCATED: NEW MONUM BIKE RACK, T EXISTING LIGI WALLMOUNI LIGHT, TYPIC) EXISTING FLA RELOCATED N SITE PLAN - REVISED PR( 1" = 20'-0" ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 a STRUCTURE E, SEE 8 / A1.1 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS 4 EXISTING DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES PROPERTY LINE TYP. N LANDSCAPE PLAN 111 = 20'-011 ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 o u r�Qr�oea4Qc� apar�4 nom, Qr�4 I r) "t ' ,1 raze 2 EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREES 4 EXISTING DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES tear park 1 1A d, I 181CAL KAR :U 1 IAX 000 11R,90l[Z6 I RETAINING WALL, — SEE CIVIL PERVIOUS PAVERS IN PARKING STALLS TYP., SEE CIVIL FOR SURFACING PLAN 81CAL KAR ri 0 W.�© I 81RHU GRO TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCH. GI Illto] IWd►4 41ULM FR9 I[ol 1 104 ON LIK49 1000] 1i A► ,I INWillWRINWO 4t4r� s is IY 4tiai' RHU GRO 4 HOS RO 'psi /1e91Yws�4i� s #1 Cont. RHU GRO 2 #5 Cont. e s iw PLAYGROUND WAY prDp(mad Z unn {10OCYJG1lh( tG ti S PROPERTY LINE TYP. i ump 51THU PYR Imp w IImmLem '114 1 IPG W5 '• I0 .®tea �•�1 •'• 3 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS NEWS�� ■irw�a►w�� 44 �nnnnnmY♦� 4' a "MEW', � I�q�a4 o .UF ® �PC � a4 e00p�. ��00lI:I14t4s_� 4 COURTYARD ENLARGEMENT I r) "t ' ,1 raze 2 EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREES 4 EXISTING DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES tear park 1 1A d, I 181CAL KAR :U 1 IAX 000 11R,90l[Z6 I RETAINING WALL, — SEE CIVIL PERVIOUS PAVERS IN PARKING STALLS TYP., SEE CIVIL FOR SURFACING PLAN 81CAL KAR ri 0 W.�© I 81RHU GRO TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCH. GI Illto] IWd►4 41ULM FR9 I[ol 1 104 ON LIK49 1000] 1i A► ,I INWillWRINWO 4t4r� s is IY 4tiai' RHU GRO 4 HOS RO 'psi /1e91Yws�4i� s #1 Cont. RHU GRO 2 #5 Cont. e s iw PLAYGROUND WAY prDp(mad Z unn {10OCYJG1lh( tG ti S PROPERTY LINE TYP. i ump 51THU PYR Imp w IImmLem '114 1 IPG W5 '• I0 .®tea �•�1 •'• 3 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS w ¢ w � J P � F O 7 L 0/. / — II% sum )R = 946.5 )ING = 28.5 i it /* 7 +W SOUTH L NE OF THE N TH 10 FEET OF LOT BALSAMI R O Ae� , NORTH LINE OF BALSAM 11 AD AS PUBLIC RIGHT OFIWgy \—I COURTYARD AND ENTRY CONCEPT - APARTMENT BUILDINGS ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 hak PLAYGROUND AND ENTRY CONCEPT- TOWNHOMES NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS EXISTING BUILDING ADDITION APARTMENT BUILDING UNIT LAYOUT - FIRST FLOOR ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS EXISTING BUILDING ADDITION APARTMENT BUILDING UNIT LAYOUT - SECOND FLOOR ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS EXISTING BUILDING ADDITION APARTMENT BUILDING UNIT LAYOUT - THIRD FLOOR ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS EXISTING BUILDING ADDITION m APARTMENT BUILDING UNIT LAYOUT - FOURTH FLOOR ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS E APARTMENT BUILDING - FIRST FLOOR PLAN ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 A4.2 J NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS APARTMENT BUILDING - SECOND FLOOR PLAN ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 A4.2 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS APARTMENT BUILDING - THIRD FLOOR PLAN ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 A4.2 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS APARTMENT BUILDING - FOURTH FLOOR PLAN ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 A4.2 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS M Z I 126'- 3 1/4" 25' - (P' 26'- 9 7/9" TOWNHOMES - FIRST FLOOR PLAN ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS TOWNHOMES - SECOND FLOOR PLAN ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS Mir ". -11i t a � Commerce Blvd I • IAarck Minnesota • Street View - Aug 2015 it DIVAL■:k► 91NEWFA IC NO i • w 46 t L r ri A Pr 6 1. w IIr f SOUTHWEST VIEW OF APARTMENT BUILDING - PROPOSED ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS CJ / 1 9 O C� SOUTHWEST VIEW OF APARTMENT BUILDING - PROPOSED ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 0 IV 4 ke., . e � I A. r ll?T ,moots f 0 11 M 9 49 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS APARTMENT BUILDING COURTYARD - PROPOSED ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 �I 04, 17EIIIII v II I II I I I II I I II II I� II II I NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS v t a 0 m7E LN EAST VIEW OF APARTMENT BUILDING - PROPOSED NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS SOUTHEAST VIEW OF APARTMENT BUILDING - PROPOSED ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS 0 w v 0 0 `� ��] VIEW OF FOUR UNIT TOWNHOME BUILDING ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 7 J 9 0 J TO ''!T7 - ---- NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS In Ali■rll�i ■ VIEW OF FOUR UNIT TOWNHOME BUILDING ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 1 IL ri FFI III NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS 01'110 VIEW OF FOUR AND SIX UNIT TOWNHOME BUILDINGS ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 171 R` ■ I' LI • IIt IIImmlml 71=2 NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS ,Ai IIll 611 uorCttNCP wux l ul ncnrEo xxw ulouuu emE nets, l Exismr,Fw LL tlWN t1�11, ryPIC. E%STNGIU PEtOCFiEf GENERAL NOTES i all.. mu.T..11l "INEElP,, M 00. lllF IE WALL Rl llll6 LMI NHEPMSE z. 6EE OYeY.ft POOIIIfNgt q 1.FP WTEIt I.IE5.1 IN KEV PLAN $"KVYNPE 1,E. ou: U) F— LU W 2E N- I.E. Q MQ LL O z J J O S' z LPxoME MP. ME of BUILDING DATA APARTMENT BUILDING LEVEL 06.F. LfVEt 6.S f. N i ITS, (Nsl a6M1 NMw 1111, sfcpnT As6p wG 10111 PoVglx 1116 Gm TOTAL BSYO] VNIi TYPE G.SE. 41 VN111YPE tOLOT 11, 10 1816 M INS 1S IG IR SGAwN6ANVGggwAsf PLAG 461 3 Ell - vEL UPIOG 618[1 EA61 13B Bz 1 6W B:. 1 GVIL UEIMS a 6W 16 3tT iOiN 66 LANGETAPE PLAN AT M11 GLUTS BPL ENOBEII Aa,i APTEGLON101 GO FOLNBAPON DEMOLILON PLAN Lvuw6G llllsxr LIST 3r-rSLUNG SITE DATA / LOT USAGE TOWNHDMES - 6 UNIT TOTAL EGINEANG TOO LOGIN LfVEt 6.S f. INE .,A 'Ell ITAIN111 P.I (Nsl a6M1 RATING, III 11ME1, S11111 .11 sfcpnT As6p TOTAL G6a 10111 :PIG PON INPOSPET4E Gm .11 1,10 1OVXI VNIi TYPE G.SE. 41 1GID Al PfiCr0.5vD [aslry cpxlaW PLAN N 1816 1116 SOUP BE,.A 1S IG G1_ SGAwN6ANVGggwAsf PLAG SLUSaALOBaCHILETTS 6P` IT- vEL UPIOG 618[1 EA61 c6o --SORA NGMIGNI LNNINGEOOLPRINI EI EE GVIL UEIMS ,MIT PALL MN..551E, CE'E N, 60 GVILOVESP 4i a5' -A" TOWNHOMES - 4 UNIT AREA TOTAL EGINEANG TOO LOGIN LB.GAF INE .,A 'Ell ITAIN111 P.I All RATING, III 11ME1, S11111 .11 21 El Ll TOWNHOMES - 4 UNIT AREA LEVEL muawDESIBEw I". IMa All sEc6nD Dol _ TOTAL G6a ..NpIES ANU LE6ENU :PIG PON INPOSPET4E Gm .11 1,10 1OVXI .. AT I PP%gM1G BaOwx cpxapLPA sIwt pa i6a3 PfiCr0.5vD [aslry cpxlaW PLAN N 1816 LGO SOUP BE,.A 1DIAl wa SGAwN6ANVGggwAsf PLAG SLUSaALOBaCHILETTS BSUIGIS11FROST .131 GS F, vEL UPIOG 618[1 EA61 c6o --SORA NGMIGNI 15',5" BENOIST n0 muawDESIBEw I". pWN@ All P66fMBV £EON ..NpIES ANU LE6ENU :PIG PON INPOSPET4E Gm SITE UE..11. "I'M f3.6 PP%gM1G BaOwx cpxapLPA sIwt v Vaa F9 PfiCr0.5vD [aslry cpxlaW PLAN N G". e LGO SOUP BE,.A ARCHrtER wa SGAwN6ANVGggwAsf PLAG SLUSaALOBaCHILETTS 11B uqurvvux vEL UPIOG 618[1 EA61 c6o PAI6xGPux sw1E 600 - GVIL UEIMS ,MIT PALL MN..551E, CE'E N, 60 L10 IANDBLAPE RAN 166155006=1 LANGETAPE PLAN AT M11 GLUTS BPL ENOBEII Aa,i APTEGLON101 GO FOLNBAPON DEMOLILON PLAN BILLBIU IAATISO."12 IG AT µAHTMEx1 BtU6. IIfl61 fLO0D DE M OIITON PIPN 1LIN 816651 LHEEA LUSINN SS OENikN 90 G.111SITSI(I - " AppAIM[M bWT "GOONSTEM"'A.PNN SELL TOB AAA APAx1MENIBLUO,-THASGI EEUILIBINPLAN MINNEAPOLR, MN PALI q}5 APIII MEIV BIWi TOOTH UORDEMOUGGPUN AIgx DP\9S .1 MARTIJENI BL DG: P.."MwTIION PLAN P6MPBII-]EI /y APARTMENT BNG- OWEWNGVNII DfIAMI1WNR.W6 ESIL EPAINEEB .VH APAJTTMIGIBNG.-fOVNDAPCN PIAN PIEPGPPIMASSLIATEA +11 APAg1MENi BLDG -(10.31 fL U00. PLAN SPA GUOAL GONE NE 111G M.iflI.1NI BLD G: 6ELONDI1O1PLM ABLE IT, M,11 Al.= LIPS, IESIO11 DR,LPN S41W.G1114 1 pgL1IINI BNS-fWalaII"B" 1111 SIT. Al 13 MARTT.TErv1E I6. BIG' PLAN P 1a151)-1311 $1: APON MENI BL06: ENLARGEp VNIT PLANS LANU6G PE A RLWifpi A2lE MART MEM BNG-ENIAP6N VNIi PIANS AVN[ HBNANO11 UNBSWPE A6TTIE116 pall APAREMENI BNS,-UEM 6061 MON SPATE OLAM Ill ISMgYT AV E, A'!.I> 1014NNOlAE6-fOVHWlI0NPW18 61, 'ALL ON 66111 p218 I OWNHOMf6�f.111011 PLATS GIIIIVNE p fi51-R4A�6155 AST, TGGA'U1I-IE11NEINU1EA1l PS OARTEMEN -f101 PLANS cWM6AL OOBINTPELLAS E# AS 'i 'i MARIES. SLO PiISI NAILEV1uxs sA' gPpg11ANI LN¢XIEflIOfl KEVAiIOfq IWG18RWa0A0BAG 1 .1 TRIG M APAflIMENTL-N6.-ATTERIOBElEVAILINS MUIEGP PLEAUS"..-.11NNPL ry AA4 M0AE3-MMEVA11`1 =111A OTRYMP .11.ILLSTEGI P 9£HLc-0066 AT I OPUBSENT BNS NIIDBIG SUNNI 15 l iOWNxOMES-LNIOING SE'T'S' Sp',SOL FOLIMMS11B)l "I 611E PH0101AEiRITECOLLECTS a"11 1 EM@ OSN11I6 UNDLSEAPP.1E1.11 EE Vis CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING AND INSPECTION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS A, OBTAIN PERMITS FOR SITE WORK FROM CITY OF MOUND ANO ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES WITH JURISDICTION IN THIS CONSTRUCTION AREA. B. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION ALONG PERIMETER OF SITE. INSTPLL EROSION CONTROL INSERTS AT ALL CATCHBASINS AND MANHOLES AND CONSTRUCT ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. SEE EROSION CONTROL NOTES FOR FURTHER INSTRUCTION. C. PROCEED WITH SITE DEMOLITION. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION. 0, MUNTAIN EROSION CONTROL AMP'S AND CONTROL RUNOFF REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED ON BRAKING AND SPECIFICATIONS. E ALL SITE WORK SHOULD BE COMPLETE PRIOR TO WORK ON THE INFILTRATOR MEAN BEING STARTED i0 THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. IF CONSTRUCTION OF THESE AREAS NEEDS TO OCCUR PRIOR TO RNA. SITE STABILIZATION. THEN THE CONSTRUCTED AREA MUST BE PROTECTED AND CONTRIBUTING FLOWS NEED TO BE FILTERED TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE SYSTEM OR COMPACTION OF THE FILTRATION AREA P, SHOP DRAWINGS BE ALL SYSTEMS NEED TO BE APPROVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL SOIL MATERIAL TESTING SHALL BE DONE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO ENSURE SOIL MIXTURE IS ADEONA E FOR FILTRALION, TESTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ENGINEER ANO APPROVED PRIOR 70 INSTALLATION. SPECIFICATIONS INDICATE MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR TACH SYSTEM. G. NOT CIVIL ENGINEER AND CITY OF MOUND OF WORK BEING DONE ON STGRMWATER SYSTEMS AND THE SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF FIVE WORKING DAYS FOR NOTIFICATION. 50 ENGINEER CAN CONDUCT SITE MEETING TO DISCUSS THE INTENT OF THE SYSTEM AND 50 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION CAN BE SCHEDULED AC(ORDAGM SITE MEETING TO REVIEW THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF ME INFILTRATION SYSTEM NEEDS TO OCCUR PRIOR i0 STARTING CONSTRUCTION M THE SYSTEM, H. ALL SOIL MATERIAL TESTING SHALL BE DONE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE RLTATION SYSTEM TO ENSURE SUBGRADE SOILS MEET MINIMUM FILTRATION RATE OF 0.80 INCHES PER HOUR. 1. REMOVE ANY CLAY MATERIALS BELOW BOTTOM OF FILTRATION AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER ON SITE TO VERIFY CLAY MATERIAL WNHIN INFILTRATION MEAS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. B CKPILL ATTH CLEAN SELECT GRANULAR BACKFILL PER MNDOi SOOT 3149.2 82 MODIFIED 50 LESS THAN 52 PASSES THE 8200 SIEVE, CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT MATERIAL TESTING REPORTS TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO PIPE AND ROCK INSTALLATION_ J. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO CONDUCT FLOOD TEST i0 MEASURE SUBGRAOE INFILTRATION RATE TO ENSORE SU AGNATE MEETS MINIMUM INFILTRATION RATE OF 0.80 INCHES PER HOUR. SEE NOTE /H, K. SCARIFY 12' OF THE EXISTING SUBDIVIDE WITHIN FILTRATION AREAS TO PROMOTE FILTRATION OF STGRMWATER INTO UNDERLYING SUSGRADE SOILS, L MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ON CONTRIBUTING AREAS TO AV01D CLOGGING OF SYSTEM. M. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER SYSTEMS PER DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, N. COMPLETE CONSTRUMON OF PARKING AND SIDEWALKS AFTER STORMWATER SYSTEM IS INSTALLED. AFTER PAVEMENT IS INSTALLED, VERIFY THAT FILTRATION SYSTEMS ME CLEAR MO FULLY FUNCTIONAL. VACUUM AND CLEAN SYSTEMS AS NEEDED SO THEY ARE POLL' FUNCTIONAL AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT. 0. INSTALL LANDSCAPING AND PLANTING MATERNLS PER IANDSGPE DRAWINGS AND SPECIEICATIONS. R REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL BMP'S AFTER PAVING AND INFILTRATION AREAS ME COMPLETE AND AFTER TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 0. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS AND MEASUREMENTS OF ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DOCUMENTATION OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CML ENGINEER AT THE CLOSEOUT OF ME PROJECT. CLOSEOUT DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE PHOTOGRAPHS AND MEASUREMENTS OF SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION, TESTING REPORTS AND OBSEWA71ON5 AND REDLINE DRAWINGS OF ANY FIELD MODIFICATIONS MME DURING CONSTRUCTION. R. A LETTER WRITTEN ON COMPANY LETTERHEAD THAT THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES HAVE BEEN BUILT PER THE CMU L PNS, OR PER REDLINE FIELD DRAWINGS. SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CIVIL ENGINEER AT THE CLOSEOUT OP THE PROJECT. S. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT AN AS -BUILT SURVEY OF THE COMPLETED SBE PREPARED MD SIGNED BY A LICENSED SURVEYOR TO THECML ENGINEER AT THE END OF THE PROJECT, AS -BUILT SURVEY SHALL INCLUDE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO VERIFY THE CONSTRUCTED TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND SITE ELEMENTS. COORDINATE WITH OWNER AND CML ENGINEER FOR SCHEDULE FOR WHEN THIS SHALL BE COMPLETED. L REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL AMP'S AFTER PAVING MD INFILTRATION AREAS ARE COMPLETE AND AFTER TURF HAS BEEN ESTMLISHED, GENERAL NOTES L ALL EXISTING INFORMATION LOAN FROM SURVEY BY ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY BATED AUGUST 27, 2.15. 2, SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION COMPLETED 9Y NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. REPORT JISSI309.ID0 DATED APRIL 22. 2016, J. COMRACYOR To FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 4, ALL ARM DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WHICH ARE OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING ARE TO BE RESTORED AND REVECITATED. 5. ALL UTILITY DEMOLITION AND/OR ABANDONMENT TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF MOUND AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULATIONS ANO STANDARDS, 6, EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTURES WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT 6 NOT LIMITED TO: ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE. GAS, EASE N, COMPUTER CABLE. FIBER OPTIC CABLE, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER. STEAM. CONDENSATE ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK AND WATER HAM. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT GOPHER ONE -CALL BEFORE EXCAVATING. 7. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND 07HER IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. B. COMPACTOR TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. LANDSCAPING. STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE i0 REMAIN. CONTRACTOR i0 REPAIR ANY DAMAGE W DAN EXPENSE. 9, CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PRIOR TO THE STMT OF CONSTRUCTION. 11. PROVIDE ME FOLLOWING MINIMUM COVER OVER THE TOP OF PIPE AS FOLLOWS: A B' OVER WATER MAIN B. 5OVER SANITARY SEWER C V OVER STORM SEWER 12. ALL WORK TO CONFORM WITH Cltt OF MOUND AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS. 13. ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REOUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR. PART 1926, SUBPART P 'EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 14. CATCH MINE AND MANHOLES ARE SHOWN ON PUN URGER THAN ACTUAL SIZE. COORDINATE LOCATION OF MANHOLE COVER AND CASING SO THAT IT 15 PROPERLY LOCATED AT THE PACK OF CURB LINE FOR THE CURB INLETS OR CENTERED IN THE MEA AS SHOWN ON THE PUN FOR THE MG TRAINS AND MANHOLE COVERS. 15. PROVIDE BARRICADES AT STREETS AND SIDEWALKS PER Cltt MOUND REQUIREMENTS. 16. SITE UTILITY CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH AND INSTALL ALL WATER MAN, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER FACILITIES ANO APPURTENANCES i0 WITHIN EM FEET OUTSIDE THE BUILDING. COORDINATE WITH MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DEPTH OF CONNECTION WITHIN BUILDING. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECT'S DRAWINGS TO VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND OUMTITY OF ALL HOOF DRAINS AND UTILITY CONNECTIONS. LIMITS OF PROPOSED SITE PLUMBING FACILITES SHALL BE FIVE FEET FROM EDGE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 18, CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS PRIOR TO STARLING CONSTRUCTION. 19. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR LANDSCAPING AND CONCRETE JOIN71NG. SEE ELECTRICAL PUNS FOR SITE LIGHTING, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR RETAINING WALL DESIGN. OT ALL WORK i0 CONFORM TO CITY OF MOUND STANDARDS. ALL COMPLETED WORK IS SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY THE CITY OF MOUND SEWER UTILITY DEPARTMENT M A REASONABLE TIME BEFORE BACKFILLING. 21, WATER SERVICES TO BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO SPEAKS STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF WATER MAINS.. 22. CONNECTIONS i0 PUBLIC SEWERS MUST BE GONE BY A LICENSED HOUSE SEWER CONTRACTOR UNDER A PERMIT FROM MOUND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. 23. ALL WATER PIPE WORK INSIDE OF PROPERTY TO BE PERFORMED BY A PLUMBER LICENSED BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND CERTIFIED BY THE CITY OF MOUND. 24. ALL MATERIALS FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR REPAIR OF EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE NEW PRODUCTS DIRECT FROM THE FACTORY AND FREE FROM DEFECTS, 25. WHEN WORKING AROUND EXISTING TELEPHONE OR ELECTRICAL POLES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRACE THE POLE FOR SUPPORT. 26, WHEN WORKING MOUND EXISTING UTILITIES THAT BECOME EXPOSED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICE RT SUPPORT TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE STRESS ON THE PIPING. THE CONTRACTOR 15 FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES CAUSED BY FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE ANO PRESERVE THESE UNDERGROUND FACILGIES. 27, WASTE MATERIALS INCLUDING PAVEMENT REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, WASTE PIPING MD SUPPLIES. CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHLLL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT SITE AND DISPOSED OF PROPERLY BY THE CONTRACTOR, 28. RAMADA CROSS -SLOPES FOR SIDEWALKS AND AM ACCESS ROUTES SHALL NOT EXCEED EDDS, MAXIMUM SLOPES FOR HANDICAP ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.002 ALONG THE PATH OF TRAVEL. 29. COMPACTOR SHALL NOT BLOCK DRAINAGE FROM OR DIRECT EXCESS DRAINAGE ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTY. 30, ADEQUATE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND ANY DRAINAGE DITCH OR STRUCTURE D15URBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNING AUTHORITY ALL CONSTRUCTION STORM RUNOFF SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM INSIDES) REQUIREMENTS. 31, SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND FIRINGS TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC), SDR 26 MINIMUM AND COMPLY WITH ASN 03034 AND F679, JOINTS TO BE SOLVENT CEMENT OR FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT. 32, STORM SEWER PIPE i0 BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), ASTM CTIL CLASS 5, WITH GASKETED JgNTS, POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PAC) SDR 26 MINIMUM COMPLYING WITH ASTM D3034 AND F679 WITH SOLVENT CEMENT OR FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT JOINTS. OR CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE (CSP) PER SPECIFICATIONS. 33 -WATER MAIN TO BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) THICKNESS CLASS 52 FOR 8' DRP AND THICKNESS CLASS 53 FOR 4' AND 6' DIP. 34. MAINTAIN 3 FEET VERTICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER PIPES OR A 12 INCH SEPARATION WITH 4 INCH HIGH DENSITY INSULATION PER SWISS STANDARD PLATE D-10 FOR TYPICAL WATER IN OFFSETS CARE MUST BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION TO PROTECT ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS AND/OR PROPERTY IRONS. 35. ALL STUMPS FROM TREES REMOVED WRwN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE GROUND AHD REMOVED IN THEIR ENTIRETY, 36. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITHIN EXISTING PAVEMENT AREAS TO BE RESTORED TO MATCH EXISTING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 37, DRAWINGS DO NOT INDICATE ALFAS OF TEMPORARY SUPPORT SYSTEMS, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MEANS MD METHODS AND WILL HAVE TOTAL CONTROL EVER THE TYPES AND DESIGN OF ALL SHORING, SHEETING, BRACING. ANCHORAGES, EXCAVATOR SUPPORT WAILS, DIRECUMAL BORING, AUGER JACKING, SOIL STABLIZATION AND OTHER AETHGDS OF PROTECTING EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS, 38. STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF EXISTING SITE FEATURES WHICH NEED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. STORAGE SHALL BE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF STAGING AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT DAMAGE OR THEFT OF THESE ITEMS AND 10 REPLACE Ai OWN EXPENSE, 39. CONTRACTOR TO RECORD EXISTING CONDITIONS AS NEEDED (PHOTOGRAPHS, VIDEO PHOTOGRAPHY, FIELD SURVEYING. ETC.) TO ENABLE RECONSTRUCTION TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS AS REOUIRED. CONTRACTOR 70 DOCUMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS SG THAT RECONSTRUCTED ARM WILL HAVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE SIMILAR i0 EXSTNG. AO. WHERE DEMOLITION. EXCAVATION. UNDERPINNING, PILE DRIVING COMPACTING OR SIMILAR WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED ADJACENT 10 OR IN THE 1AEOALTE VICINITY OF EXISTING STRUCTURES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE BUILDING SU.MYS AND SEISMIC MONITORING. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING OF BUILDING AND KEEPING OWNER INFORMED OF OPERATIONS THAT MAY IMPACT STRUCTURES. 41. MANCONING EXISTING SEWER SERVICE OR MAKING NEW CONNECTIONS TO Ott SEWER MUST BE DONE TO CITY STANDARDS BY A LICENSED HOUSE DRAIN CONTRACTOR UNDER A PERMIT FROM FUGUE WORKS SEWER SECTION (651-266-6234). 42. AS A CONDITION OF THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. THE APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS (PAPER OR PDF) OF ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWER LINES AND ALL APPURTENANCES WHICH WERE INSTALLED ON A DO N07 OF ACTUALLY INSTALLED MD AS FIELD VERIFIED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR A REPRESENTATIVE THEREOF, THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AS 'CONSTRUCTION AS-BVILT DRAWINGS IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH OWING AND SHALL BEAR THE SIGNATURE AND SGL OF A PROFESSION ENGINEER 43, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT BRAN VITEX. LIGHTING-SWNAL MAINTENANCE. (651-266-9773), IF REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES IS REQUIRED OR IN THE EVENT OF DAMAGE TO THE LIGHTING OR SIGNAL UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY (AND FELLOW COSTS) FOR ANY DAMAGE OR RELOCATIONS. M, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT BRAD NTEK, LIGHTING-SIGNLL MNNTENANCE, (651-266-9773), IF REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING FACILITIES IS REQUIRED OR IN THE EVENT OF DAMAGE TO THE LIGHTING OR SIGNAL OTILIIIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY (AND RELATED COSTS) FOR ANY DAMAGE OR RELOCATIONS. 45. CARE MUST BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION AND EXCAVATION TO PROTECT ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS PND/OR PROPERTY IRONS, CALL SAM GIBSON 0651-266-6075) OF PUBLIC WORKS SURVICYNG IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, 46. INSPECTION GDNTACU THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE RIGNT-OF-WAY INSPECTOR. JIM FEW, AT (651) 485-0417 (ONE WEEK PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK) 70 DISCUSS TRAFFIC CONTROL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY AND COORDINATION OF ALL WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTE: IF A ONE WEEK NOTICE IS NOT PROVIDED i0 THE CITY, ANY RESULTING DELAYS SHALL BE THE ROLE RESPONSIBUU TY OF THE CONTRACTOR, 47. SAFE WORK REQUIREMENTS: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS. ACCESSIBLE AND SAFE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY THAT MEETS ADA AND AN PENCE) STANDARDS IF WORKING IN A SIDEWALK AREA AND TRAFFIC CONTROL PER MN MUTED REQUIREMENTS FOR WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -DF -WAY. 48, NO ESTATE FACILITIES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY: THE DEVELOPER IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED FROM INSTALLING PRIVATE ELECTRICAL WIRING, CONDUIT, RECEPTACLES ANO/OR LIGHTING IN THE GIFTS RIGHT-OF-WAY, THIS INCLUDES STUBBING CONDUIT OR CABLE INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ACCOMMODATE UTILITY FEEDS TO THE SITE, COORDINATE WITH TACH LTILItt PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE FEED POINTS INTO THE PROPERTY. UTILITIES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING EXCAVATION PERMITS i0 RUN THEIR SERVICE INTO A SITE AND (WHERE REQUIRED) SUBMITTING PLANS FOR REVIEW BY THE PUBLIC WORKS UTILITY RENEW COMMITTEE, 49. ORDERING OBSTRUCPON AND EXCAVRpN PERMITS: CONTACT PUBLIC WORKS RIGHT-OF-WAY SERVICE DESK AT (651) 266-6151. T IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT COMPACTORS CALL FOR COST ESTIMATES PRIOR TO BIDDING TO OBTAIN ACCURATE COST ESTIMATES. 50, OBSTRUCTION PERMITS: THE CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN AN OBSTRUCTION PERIAIi IF CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING SILT FENCES) WILL BLOCK CITY STREETS. SIDEWALKS OR ALLEYS, OR IF SPRING MEN CURBS. 51. EXCAVATION PERMITS: ALL DIGGING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAV REQUIRES AN EXCAVATION PERMIT. IF THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS CLOSE TO THE RICHT-OF-WAY AND EXCAVATING INTO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS NEEDED TO FACILDATE CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT THE UTILITY WSPECTGR. 52. FAILURE TO SECURE PERMITS: FAILURE TO SECURE OBSTRUCTION PERMITS OR EXCAVATION PERMITS WILL RESULT N A DOUBLE-PERMB FEE AND OTHER FEES REQUIRED UNDER Cltt OF MOUND LEGISLATIVE CODES, 53. REQUIREMENTS TO WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -DF -WAV: ALL UTILITIES MD CONTRACTORS WORKING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -0F -WAY MUST BE REGISTERED. INSURED MD BONDED AS RECOGNIZED BY ME PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE DESK (651) 266-6151. EXISTING TIMBER WALL, BLOCK WALL. WOOD FENCE OR BRICK EDGING EXOTING ELECTRIC HANDHOLE AN EXISTING GAS METER '(Gr(!lG,4P""V""`I "Yi EXISTING BUILDING LINE ��\•••••/// 1 E%ISTING TREE EXISTING ELECTRIC HANGHOLE EXISTING SIGN ogeoe EXISTING FUG POLE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE -- EXISTING OVERHAD WIRE L -c -c- EXISTING GAS LINE pa 5- E%ISTING Y.NITARY LINE IZ ST EXISTING STORM LINE C N EXISTING WATER LINE - - -E- EXISTING ELECTRIC USE F EXISTING BUS SHELTER Caa voNe EXISTING GAS VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT CILP EXISTING UGHTPOLE -%--- EXISTING GUY WIRE Qac EXISTING POWERPOLE CACP EXISTING CATCHEASIN EXISTING HANDICAP PARKING �-� EXISTING GUARDRAIL 0- EXISTING MANHOLE IVI EXISTING BIKE BACK ��o a EXISTING PORTABLE CURB - - - - PROPERTY UNE - - - - - - CASEMENT / BOUNDARY LINE 254 PROPOSED CONTOUR ♦IK3 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 4K-- DENOTES SURFACE DRAINAGE It PROPOSED EGRESS - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED SAVIOUR LINE ®B-2 APPROXIMATE SBL BDBNG LOCATION *---* EXISTING UTILITY i0 BE REMOVED PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN - T- PROPOSED DRANTILE PROPOSED TRENCH DRAIN ® WORMED CATCH BASIN O PROPOSED MANHOLE Co. PROPOSED CLEAN OUT DS PROPOSED DOWNSPOUT PROPOSED HYDRANT MO PROPOSED DATE VALVE < PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION Aw PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION W/ MEWS ® PROPOSED MST INDICATOR VALVE ® PROPOSED REFRAINS WALL �„,.. SILT FENCE EROSION CONTROL AT CB/MH ® EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED C�I PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVING PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVING PROPOSED CONCRETE 9DEWALK PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE IMnty"TNNl Lxs AH P.Nul'FA "'.1 1, wFAPIb by T. N UARI IN n TAKATUPINTA:-Nlv ,'GrA AL...m-Nm. U. A....' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRAL AVE NE. SUITE 312 ELAINE, MN 55434 TEL763,537.1311 TAX 763.537.1354 Job A, C.1 1. 20 J 2Imo— ' t� . �F�R�X= z Q za2g_ I I � � " 1111�1I 1 L l � �'�'� �3,.m� � �� v � yr °'� �, o'vv ?(v / � _#" ..• A N � 27 ¢ BrMMMDDs VEMENT i0 BE REMOVED A ," J/ 88'4244 I il30' SOR BBIfl �r�w`R f `� �s REMD, 26 V \ 1 \ I� p.¢s a V /ErNc io v v y oa 1 zoo°oa( �. `� �i • \\ i `� To 1 of a 000m l 2a r°'O; M oh�D9A �w 20 v A REMODvOVoi ) /iSi 17 /4'E.ISg M. 23 1 — 1 21 � vV w ox RE PWi CONCRETE Nr C TO RE REMOVED % N � / I ! A \ A \ A \ \ k xg� oY' ' t `TREES TO BE 44' EXISTING eU Lp NG p a. 7 � I REMOVED (/�• es g, f"+= I - E%IStMCe E AWINfi h\ ` \ I \\ \ / irtN // ¢oxeN amR »ss li W'.L To DE REuovco ` 1 22 .��z i/ 7 Nc cxi "jes n.. Q I� \ su —CONCRETE PAVEMENT/ , = a, / iD Bf RE40VED / ¢o L.I I� 11GHi POLE TD 11 5 \ -k[MDv[n //'WREMOVED. Ts \ r" 0 LONCRErE'PAVEMEM \\ / 13 TA S, e— F E i ;ur iwaN ra B . zssz �'// •o): 1 j Si sd `v vv / / / / Oe �/ ^ 10 MOUND, 27 30 31 N J '✓6� /� % iONBE EMOM JENT V _ / c NORTH ®l SITE DEMOLITION PLAN 772 —2. 0 20 D' w w .n: s � n pU WD U¢ pertpy [eMrW lm¢pm.igeMsbM1 .wpnwe¢nrtoertxwmeo<ome my pLN eel mNbee onpdeNe®r¢o1yPe soMOl Mnmeeoo. flN. No'. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9296 CENTRAL AVE NE, 12 B RINE, MN 55A, TEL 763.537.1311 FAN 761537.1356 W G F— a. 4 O Z Q z CL J O cz Z o Q z RRDONx JW Np: 159 snmxomoe C.2. n �e a ae- oN �U QF„n 3U wU tt UQ 1 NnM [eNry MnlAs plan, ¢prta¢ihn m �ewnwa: plawlw W nea��mr ee:c ¢upamtlw. aye ma I am a acv IaWux �pme«°muw uw: °I me sum cNlRe,m sgreo NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRALAVE NE. SURE 312 BILINE, NN 55434 TEL 763.537,1311 !Ax 763,537.1354 U) W F- F - z � i Q r2 ofr Q F z C) Z z Q o c� 0 o J w J cs CD z z CL o z a flENSpNs NORTH ® SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS C32 +'=20' snm xunx 0 20 40' 60' C®� i7- L I I I I I 1 I 1 u C .ORT. ® SWPPP — PROPOSED CONDITIONS C3.3 1'=20' 0 0' 40' Ea Inma/cemh ma Yrs pen, gcakaMn, ,r rtponwaz prtperze ey mewwMr my l .d N,I:ee Na xm xeev srze en9 .unoer mean ame x�s m mnrewo. 6gm0 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRALAVE NE. SUITE 312 BIAINE, WN 55434 TEL 761537.1311 FAY 763.537.1354 z Q J d J O F- F— a O U Z O C) O w O w En O CL O rcw w w CL 3 U) Itv199xt gyp— sMp xrmmer 15459 METAL (OR WOOD) BY CALCULATION POST OR STAKE SILT FENCE SLOPE HY PERCENT FABRIC SILT FENCE STORAGE FOURS 2 M FOR A 2 -YEAR EVENT OR 3 M FOR A 100 -YEAR EVENT MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH -FABRIC ANCHORAGE DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS NOTES: APART TRENCH PACK FILL WITH TAMPED 1 SILT FENCES SHOULD BE INSTALLED ON I NATURAL SOIL THE CONTOUR (AS OPPOSED i0 UP AND AEG M 25 M DOWN A HILL) AND CONSTRUCTED SO DIRECTION OF1 2 INSTALL PER MNOOT SPEC, SECTION 3575 THAT FLOW CANNOT BYPASS THE ENDS. RUNOFF FLOW II 3. ENSURE THAI THE DRAINAGE AREA IS NO X11=SEL--ILII ij 3 11{li GREATER THAN 1// ACRE PER 100 R OF ACE FENCE. II,R 6 II 1� .1. _ 50 M 3. HANE THE FENCE STABLE FOR ME f0 -YEAR PUT( STORM RUNOFF, /-r�R`1-D = NATURAL SOIL-' 'IJRF A, WHERE ALL RUNOFF 15 TO STORED 50 M 101 BEHIND THE SILL FENCE ENSURE THAT NOTE: SLi FENCE SNALL FOLLOW 90 R THE MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH BEHIND NO MNDOT SPEC SECTION 3886. THE FENCE GOES NOT EXCEED THE FIGURE 1 TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN IN TABLE L TABLE 1 MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH AND SLOPE FOR WHICH SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE TREE PROTECTION NOTES 1) ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE PIANS PRIOR i0 ANY DEMOLITION. AFTER DEMOLITION OR AS NECESStRI, TREE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE ANY MATERIALS OR PARK ANY VEHICLES IN TREE PROTECTION ZONES, THE FENCE SHALL PREVENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY FACULTIES, EOUIPMENT. STOCKPILES AND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION WITHIN THE LIMITS OF PROTECTION. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEANLY CUT ALL ROOTS EXPOSED BY GRADING AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS. HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE DETAIL2 TREE PROTECTION DETAIL CJ.4 NO SLALf C 4 NO SGL£ PILLOW SHALL THE POUCH ON ATTACH PILLOW P TRAPS 1. OIL ABSORBENT PILLOW SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WHEN NEAR SATUMTION. 2. USE DANDY® BAG 11 AS MANUFACTURED BY pAyp_ro PRODUCTS uC 3, M EOUNALENT CATCHBASIN EROSION CONTROL INSERT METHOD OR PRODUCT MAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ENGINEEP 5 CB INSERT EROSION CONTROL 2L4 NO SCALE EXTEND MATERIAL - ABOUT 40" ON TOP OF THE GROUND AND RANDOMLY INSERT STAPLES THROUGH THE MATERIAL ABOUT 2 ALAN' STAPLES STAPLES INSERTED OVERLAP BOTH FABRICS AT A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 20" APART LONGITUDINAL SUMS: —� +C BY CALCULATION BY CALCULATION BY ACCEPTED DESIGN PRACTICES SLOPE HY PERCENT I SILL FENCE STORAGE COCKLES 2 M FOR A 100 -YEAR EVENT SILT FENCE STORAGE FOURS 2 M FOR A 2 -YEAR EVENT OR 3 M FOR A 100 -YEAR EVENT MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH 100:1ft�xi APART iNROHGH THE NOTES: APART 900 R 'Do M 50:1 51 AND SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ALL DRAINAGE SWALES AND PONDING AREAS AND AEG M 25 M 25+ 2 INSTALL PER MNOOT SPEC, SECTION 3575 225 M 75 M 20:1 C3.4 No SCALE leo M 75-5o M 17.1 150 M 50 M 12.5:1 112 M 50 M 101 90 R 50-25 R 51 20% m C,1 45FT 25-15 1 4:1 25x 16 EF 36 FT I5 FT 3:1 33x 12 M 22E1 15 EI 2:1 Sox 8 Er 19 EI +s Er TREE PROTECTION NOTES 1) ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE PIANS PRIOR i0 ANY DEMOLITION. AFTER DEMOLITION OR AS NECESStRI, TREE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE ANY MATERIALS OR PARK ANY VEHICLES IN TREE PROTECTION ZONES, THE FENCE SHALL PREVENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY FACULTIES, EOUIPMENT. STOCKPILES AND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION WITHIN THE LIMITS OF PROTECTION. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEANLY CUT ALL ROOTS EXPOSED BY GRADING AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS. HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE DETAIL2 TREE PROTECTION DETAIL CJ.4 NO SLALf C 4 NO SGL£ PILLOW SHALL THE POUCH ON ATTACH PILLOW P TRAPS 1. OIL ABSORBENT PILLOW SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WHEN NEAR SATUMTION. 2. USE DANDY® BAG 11 AS MANUFACTURED BY pAyp_ro PRODUCTS uC 3, M EOUNALENT CATCHBASIN EROSION CONTROL INSERT METHOD OR PRODUCT MAY BE USED WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ENGINEEP 5 CB INSERT EROSION CONTROL 2L4 NO SCALE EXTEND MATERIAL - ABOUT 40" ON TOP OF THE GROUND AND RANDOMLY INSERT STAPLES THROUGH THE MATERIAL ABOUT 2 ALAN' STAPLES STAPLES INSERTED OVERLAP BOTH FABRICS AT A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 20" APART LONGITUDINAL SUMS: —� +C BNKET MATERIAL MUST LA Ai END OF SLOPE OVERLAP AT LEAST 6" AND SECURE RUNNEL STAPLES INSERTED THROUGH MATERIAL BY INSERTING BOTH FABRICS AT A STAPLES ABOUT 20' MAXIMUM SPACING OF 40' APART iNROHGH THE NOTES: APART FABRIC 1. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TO BE CATEGORY 4 -COCONUT 2S FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 51 AND SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ALL DRAINAGE SWALES AND PONDING AREAS AND CATEGORY 2 -STRAW 25 FOR ALL SLOPES LESS THAN 5:1 PER MNDOT SPEC, SECTION 3065. 2 INSTALL PER MNOOT SPEC, SECTION 3575 s EROSION CONTROL BLANKET C3.4 No SCALE 1, OIL ABSORBENT PILLOW SHALL BE REMOKO AND REPLACED WHEN NEAR SATURATION, AT INLET Z. PROVIDE BEAVER DAM AS MANUFACTURED BY TANDY PRODUCTS INC Y 3, AN EOUNALENT CURB INLET SOIL ABSOLOW PILLOW EROSION CONTROL METHOD OR SHOULD BE PARTIALLY PRODUCT MAY BE USED WITH BLOCKING THE CURB HOOD APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER. WHEN INSTALLED PROPERLY TUCK THE ENCLOSURE INSIDE TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE THE GRATE ABSORBENT PILLOW SHALL BE PLACED IN _PUCE INLET GRATE INTO POUCH ON THE BOTTOM (BELDW-GRADE FRAME THROUGH THE OF THE UNIT. ATTACH PILLOW t0 TETHER L6TNG OEM, LOOPS I. BEFORE INSTALLATION APPLY TOPSOIL. FERTILIZER AND SEED TO SURFACE. 2, BEGIN AT INE TOP OF THE CHANNEL, INSTALL HATS BY ANCHORING IN A 6" DEEP BY 6' WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROMMATEV 12" OF MAY EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR WITH A ROW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY 12' APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH, BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AMER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12' PORTION OF MAH PACK OVER SEED AND SOIL SECURE MATS WIN A WITH A BOW OF STAPLES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12' APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE MATS, 3, ROLL CENTER MATS 1N DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW IN BOTTOM OF CHANNEL. <. PLACE CONSECUTIVE AND AWACEM MATS END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH A MINIMUM 6' OVERLAP. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED i APART AND f ON CENTER TO SECURE OVERLAPPED MATS. 5, FULL LENGTH POOP OF MATS AT TOP OF SIOE SLOPES MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A RDW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY 12" APART IN A 6' DEEP BY 6" WIDE TRENCH, 6. THE TERMINAL END OF MAPS MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY 12" NXIS IN A fi DEEP BY 6" WIDE TRENCH. 7. PACK FILL AND SEED AFTER STAPLING. 8 FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENM71ONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION. INSTALL SHREDDED BANDAGED COIR LOG 6 MULCH (MNDOi TYPE 6). MBNIMUM OMNETER EOUNALENT MATERIAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT ME DISCRETION BF SLAKE DRIVEN THE ENGINEER. THR000H LDG 1/3 OF L MESH 2/3 OF 100 EROSION ca.4 STABILIZATION MATSNDSGALE C}9 COIR LOG NDSGALE . [upYI INPORINIl'SF. A WAP`_ FRC`W L PP.U..AY EMI. PIULEPIM, ARWIPIMON"P.P Wm.a.lNml SgIPo NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRAL AVE NE, UITE 312 S BLAME, MN 55434 TEL 76353].1311 FAX 763.537.1354 VJ Z G I— cc /Q Ei LL O Z cQ C J J Cn `CD i o W PP ED SIX E SIX U) IENSIVNS .U.— C_z A 6 spd PES d y «Nty IM1aI P¢ pYn. agnfiugn, rtpoA wu pepand fiym [Iv e�m on end lAll lam a puyrm rt fnpmee[uNergeYm NIM Sgnp NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9398 CENTREAVE NE, SUITE 313 BLMNE. MN 55434 TEL 763.537.1311 F. 763533.1354 NORTH ®GRADING AND 4DRAINAGE PLAN r-za' 60 ®4 n 1550- I I 1 1 I I I Infomallon 1 ting/iYM 1, _1= �I InreM1 6�pc$ er Gtch Batin Infomallon <P p5[ormG ting/iYM Rim InreM1 1 p-136'JFl 9ai: ?39x0 2 NOSp3213 9x6.." 993. LL 3 .S6DE1 . 93e 11 s Sp12]3 1CG 1e'suxzb VC 993.12 �9 R 25EYEt A4 s 1 vo 92 6. A23E6E1 99 s.2 m 13 Y OS X1213 �AB' ?93.W NDI 1213 91,1 990.28 _8 ND 333 9968 990.61 __ lC 1 03 1'33_ NDS X1233 Sf6p 4160 410]8 9W.98 1! ND Plz3 9160 991.12 _ 33 NDS 41213 946,0�993.a8 Pal- 18, Nnsdn>3_ zifi o' s1i. __ 1 19 NO3p3213 9460 993.93 19, Ill P16a2P. 9430 990.10 19 P-306] 99f4 99D.86 ]x:_P.3652-H _ _ s8'. 99f.9 9gp.w Io R�1601P M5.0• 9x1.61 2C NpS +1233 996.0 993.9 21 NCSX3T3 9960 M3JJ -, _._22 23 R 2sfi0 E1_., _..._ ..'E,2 13 493 9 99G.0 .903.06 90IW 3o .1211 94.0 _9930] 2' 125%LI3 909.0 4424 2f NDSb11i3 906.0 V3.9 2'f 9 s 416 0 9x3.03 38 P- 1 It2. 1 999 6' 993.N 29 R 21 1 3C 151- 60E3 T,5��42.efi _ 31 32 NUS Y1113_ N2s N1233 9AG0 966 300 993 Y9 _ 33 - m P-256¢Fl_- _ Plarea Ena ^+✓ sl N/A 90.23E 9x29 CITY SANLAK .', S DD1E IWEW 93150 10 1 Tk NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRPLAVE NE, SUITE 312 BWNE, MN 55634 TEL]63.53].1311 FM 763.537.1354 sn.al��Ra, ®; n 1 Plpe lnlormalion RAPT CB END CRtom'tENGTi 1lF SIDPE Al 1. 30�3JIYYlM118'RCP 1i CinSFV _ O1. 26PVC 5 2]7 11 ]�11`SD26 I __ 10"J.i 125DR92IPVC 9 S lG 3 Wb'* S.A16 C E. s u 1CG 1e'suxzb VC 15r3D3 1.e SDR -26P C _ 6 PVL _ ]C 8 __36 1 `00.'26 CdnB qe1 V___ l OJI. B SDR2 '` ll 10 11 20 OJI 8 SDA -26P'-__ 10J 8 SDR-26PVC 3'.1. I.IXh 8 SDA.I6 PVC 10 15 3 1 -F 3SI roR: B'WA�211 _ 1LM 16� 1_ 65 1IXY" z"ADSHPSIarm 12- ID Ll51 1] 16 _ >6, ]COk 11"R11 11' le 1c.. 2a to33n 1x`Aos Hv sfp,m Pal- 18, 113'W9f 11Y'SDP-25 PVC 12'PCP U -V 20 _ e1 19, Ill _AlF I 3.11Y.fi 8"SDR-26 PVC 1D3. R._ 19 3 lL16PVC 08VL SS'S IP$[or_m 12' AO 23; R _ _ s8'. . OJfr 8'SOR26 PVC 12' 31 O80b lz"ADSHV Storni 20 25 9 3arn a"soA-16 PVC 26' 2z' 1s Sark 8"soR-16P-/C Zl• 21, L_ 2' _I5 90 3WA 8"SDA2BPVc OBCN 11"ADS NP 11.1. 19. 3o s oOCa u'ADS HP Stovn 11 31. 32. 11 1 S'SDnsHP,C 1 PYn' B'SUR-26PrC :r 33I 39 3<` 9 s 19-x sonz6 pxc �n"M 3x`ACP CITY SANLAK .', S DD1E IWEW 93150 10 1 Tk NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRPLAVE NE, SUITE 312 BWNE, MN 55634 TEL]63.53].1311 FM 763.537.1354 sn.al��Ra, ®; n 1 o-rereeyaRX50ai1N�dM.SptiMdem, oon.a=a+o�RMreaoi��emren wren a�aru5� am oroi i am a ax ipiNerea[npm.om5.m56rnoiw sure Nw�n<:oa. 43•R� NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRALAVE NE. SUTE 313 BLNNE. NN 55434 TEL 363537.1311 FAX 363.537.1354 z 5 a ED z a a cn z W G LL ¢ ry¢ry� LL O z J J O z � o z QoF � o.ui55we: aRouems N® 1 PAVING PLAN 7-2 1n Tr —6. R 30' 40' 60 1552- I -25" ORUMINW5 BINDING COURSE MNDOT 2]60 (LVNW]50]58) 2- BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MNOOT 2360 -� -BITUMINOUS LACK CWT (LVWE350MG 10" COMPACTED CLASS 5 PER PROOF 2357 BASE (100% CRUSHED) GROOT 3138 GEOTE%TILE FABRIC 1=1E(�-1> COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT aBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL CZO NO SCALE BOL (HC PARKING SYMBOL aC 7,0 NO SCALE OF LASTING i0 BE FLUSH WITH i GRADE AT PAVED AREAS; 1- E FINISH GRADE IN LANDSCAPED FRAME AND COVER -ST 04 CONCRETE PER ASTM C478 STEPS-NEENAHR-1981E ALUMINUM O 16"OC. OWWNSTREAM) ALL BUTTED JOINTS -SEE PUN OR PIPE -SLOPE 2" PER FOOT r8" PRECAST OR C LP. EASE NOTES: 1, MANHOLES B' OR DEEPER - THE PRECAST SECTION IMMEDIATELY BELOW THE CONCRETE SECTION SHALL BE 1'-0" HIGH, 2. PROVIDE STEPS IN MANHOLES OVER 4-0' IN BE PTH_ 3. REINFORCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A SINGLE LINE WIRE FABRIC IMNNG AN AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 0.12 50, IN, PER FOOT BE HEIGHT. 4. PROVOS SNAP -NN 8001 AT ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS i0 MANHOLES, R NO TO BE DE 6 ACCESS AISLE STRIPING ND SUIS GEOTE%TLE, TYPICAL_ WALK WIQTH PER PIAN CONCRETE WALK REINFORCED WON 6"1 ITI A WAIF, w' -- --- "'- "f REINiORC EM ENi LO flE51 ON NO. 6 HORS (SIDEWALK W- WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR 6" ADJACEM f/4"/Fi. SLOPE TO DRIVEWAY \ IN iNE RIGNi-OF-WAr TO BE UNREINFORCED) FILTER MATERIAL yLl. �C - 1COMPACTED I" cRAxuWR BASE MATERIAL COARSE 'a QE� FILTER AGGREGATE PER MNOOT F r -COMPACTED 3 HU W/ LESS +- I1 - - -"41� N0. 4 BAR O 24" OX Born / -- SUfiCRADE ..]" UNREMFORCED SECTION WAYS ON TOP CF CONCRETE ]/B" PORTLAND CEMENT . HALF BRICKS AT EACH OVERLAP C/ O CONCRETE SUB 6" COMPACTED CUSS 5 BASE (IWX CRUSHED I/4"R 0 771 F 1YP CAL 1/4-R \ iYP Ut MNCOT 3138 /LLLJJJ FILLER III .III �I, IIT FULL BEPTH _1 SAWCUi _ - W OF OF WALK COMPACTED SUBGRAOE PER OR TOOL - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CONTRACTION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT NOTES: PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT AT 5' OXL MAKIMUN AT 20' GC. MA%IMDM INBOTH z CONCRETE r3CONCRETE WALK & JOINT DETAILS C%.O NO SCALE C7 p x0 SCALE R NO TO BE DE 6 ACCESS AISLE STRIPING ND SUIS GEOTE%TLE, TYPICAL_ (MNWl ]7]3, TYPE I) W- WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR TOWRAP AR0UN0 .., FILTER MATERIAL 5/B" MAKIMUM SUBDRAIN FILTER--' EXCEPT FOR 3/4" EXPANSION MATERIAL COARSE JOINTS FILTER AGGREGATE PER MNOOT P.DEPTH DF S., 3 HU W/ LESS L -p" PERFORATED PIPE THAN 5% PASSING IN MNOOT 3245 THE 1200 SIM ME SLAB THORNINESS FOR ,o DRAIN TILE DETAIL C/ O NO SCALE CLASS C 'RUETER PER MOUND SIGN -METAL SIGN ACCORDING TD STATE STATUTES n SEE DETAIL 1/1270 FOR THICKNESS r1/2" SLOPE PER GRADING PLAN-� CONCRETE i1CURB & GUTTER (B6152) cLO NO PAN�Ai AGGEBB F BE CONSTRUCTED PER CITY OF MOUND SIGN 6 WE GALVANIZED 'GST WITH NAY SLEEVES DWARF LUGS GALVANIZED POST WITH MAY SLEEVES DWARE PAVNG OR EEF WALK, ACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN rBPARKING SIGN C�_� NO SCALE C%,0 NOTE: NO SCALE INSTALL AT ALL ACCESSIBLE /PERMEABLE PAVER, ACCESS AISLES SEE MANUFACTURER ASTM N0, 8 STONE SETTING $PECIFN: BONS. BED AND IN -FILL N0. 57 STONE ED ERASE HBO `,50055 CLEAW s�/{��E}/D WiR§t. 1y.P^ EDGE RESTRAINT WITH SPIKE ANCHOR 40 MIL PVC IMPERMEABLE UNER OR APPROVED EOUNALENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SEE DETAIL 1/C7.0 CAST IN PUCE CONCRETE WITH CHAMFERED EWES PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 10' O.C. MA%. PAVERS i2 PERMEABLE PAVERS ,< CONCRETE EDGING DETAIL ci O NO SCALE [j O NO SCALE SEE NOTE 3-#" W � NOTE: THE PIPE IS BEDDED IN COMPACTED GRANDUR MATERIAL UP i0 A HEIGHT EQUAL TO ONE SIXTH THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE. THE 0EPT1 OF THE BEDDING MATERIAL BELOW THE PIPE 15 A MINIMUM OF S FOR 27' DIAMETER AND SMALLER PIPE, 6' FOR 66' DIAMETER AND LARGER PIPE, AND 4- FOR INTERMEDIATE SIZES, THE REMAINING EMBANKMENT MATERIAL IS LIGHTLY COMPACTED. s STANDARD SEWER MANHOLE+, CLASS C PIPE BEDDING O o NO SCALE (,`j.0 ND SCALE (CAST IN PUCE) j ;INiSH GRADE fi -9P ELL ® � CLFANOUT- F S WELL WELL COMPACTS DL COMPACTED 6.6 GAVE FILE FILL- N 6.6 WYE - " SWEEP 9D PLAN ELEVATION ELEVATION 3 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT C7A No SWLE AT, P, ANI FA IIN.Al xpeefivWn IrtoPrtn FITNII IA, mY rt -so. erN�p'n NWe GAP it of ANinmup uN sNAM m NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRALAVE NE, SUITE 312 BUINE, MN 55434 TEL 763537,1311 FAX 763.537.1354 AUNN .Al Z W LL ryQry�� L1. Q z Q J Oy G Y p Q F,C z a�� ,s JOINT SEALANT DETAILS ®7 (,'7.o ND SCALE -1553- / W- WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR NOTES: 1/2" MAMMON L SEPARATING TAPE OR BACKER 5/B" MAKIMUM POURED JOINT EXCEPT FOR 3/4" EXPANSION SUUM JOINTS SEPARATING TAPE P.DEPTH DF S., SEE NOTE 1 1.D TO 15 TRIES FROM BONOMG TO BOTTOM OF i= DEPTH OF INi41 SAWCOi, 1/4 OF RESERVOIR. ME SLAB THORNINESS FOR W PAVEMENT LESS THAN 12' SEE NOR Z j`--{ AT, P, ANI FA IIN.Al xpeefivWn IrtoPrtn FITNII IA, mY rt -so. erN�p'n NWe GAP it of ANinmup uN sNAM m NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRALAVE NE, SUITE 312 BUINE, MN 55434 TEL 763537,1311 FAX 763.537.1354 AUNN .Al Z W LL ryQry�� L1. Q z Q J Oy G Y p Q F,C z a�� ,s JOINT SEALANT DETAILS ®7 (,'7.o ND SCALE -1553- NOTES: r L SEPARATING TAPE OR BACKER WTERML REBURIED TO PREVENT JOINT SEALANT FROM FLOWING INTO SAWCUT. POUREDJDINI TO SEPARATE NONCOMPATIBLE SEALANT MATERNU AND i0 PREVENT SEAIANT SACKER MATERIAL FROM BONOMG TO BOTTOM OF SEE NOTE 1 RESERVOIR. 2. TOP 0P SULWT WILL BE 1/8' TO 1/4BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT. AT, P, ANI FA IIN.Al xpeefivWn IrtoPrtn FITNII IA, mY rt -so. erN�p'n NWe GAP it of ANinmup uN sNAM m NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PIERCE PINI & ASSOCIATES 9298 CENTRALAVE NE, SUITE 312 BUINE, MN 55434 TEL 763537,1311 FAX 763.537.1354 AUNN .Al Z W LL ryQry�� L1. Q z Q J Oy G Y p Q F,C z a�� ,s JOINT SEALANT DETAILS ®7 (,'7.o ND SCALE -1553- i I I I � W d J N I o dd reTTD.ated...MHN CI � d� c I n E., ..... G DLO000us I FES carpark RA \ J M110 GS ll 1 SEEC fOR JRFFCING L 1%1 11 KAft � 34 ALKFR 'RA5HEN1 T t 5 C( s � 81CAL KAR 1 1IRIlN3 NAIRIQ:,S I LIGHTING NOTE Lo_AIION Or RO OSE' LG {IDG 11 IQ'D C V C C4 LY: 111.TO EFFIC, LE CE I G El FOR f+AL1-PE C ETON F'RNG ANDA ND SECCAG ITO+.- OF MOUND )SCAPE CALCULATIONS HAIII 'Cl 1<0 PlES V dYORY FEES C(:IJIFERDDS4RC£5=<I Ian.] %+i-� 4mIBAUD PERELFAII INH", TOT..Lsneues=vz lAC.1 FILE, IIIIIIIR key notes O EI PRP ECE .0 C 5 BES 11IIII-HTFLI,IHIIEI, M1CA4OpC5 REUf D CH A tV l0.}'IEP F i1HPELEI,EEDEREVEdEA uNOEf. ALL PLANT DA BE, ,S. O ADD ALTERNATE D RG IF O OS `E LE O E S t E 11 TIO C F CC RGEDIET TO CEG O R G P( fC100 O IE J VO Eo_fa JDESOPDe cC - E AA: D oN. T E c E c E E LCc rII Po CO" Ton. EE i O -B G S T. 11 C O PFJ IEO E PR i0 L SOC FCFO EP 41 CLLCPILL I e I.UALAJ nI:FIG I..I.1 :c SYSTfN0 road lanting notes do Fit t ilome NC EfE.COR IF 11 11111HAINTE. "INCH, di<� l 0 ICTAIII IFFAIlIfIll. SH E DL1 C OFEEJ. .AH,FIIICNREFIFAA_ 1 [l IF"111IO1S LL BE 1111, HAIFORP 11 7 OIA, i ES I.CO FE'HI DITTECEINNINE1.C 1 D i IS i THE DSG F RC ECL V III CHH 11,11 1.1C.t 't G JL ^!CU E CKl EOV ATEAUHILHEA FAVATHELArIECCAPEAPECHANELI'IIC E CO J E AE L Cp ILcDE A E 1ED L G' F 1 IFTIN .rt II IC C'A SEEf E: NG U LL t C - T F CCFFTCO CEB THE 9 LLP BEGS L F CE Lra"G P , of REFER TO PECPC O fG PL J OC O AII,HP E3I Rb F 1 1 IIIII L BE OIEC EDA D II EO HE L TP C . oD F s cE E e o o F fol THE c to F e sC A IM s a EDF Lu of EG P IEE T xEET BE c ILA11 cc E eE I Ec o I PEOV E 15. IH. 'IE CESH LL LII ICI G. EEL C 5 PLANT..I t 5'B KPO LED 7 ST KE J J DEI A TER L RCE II CR C RE El' P PRO GI -DE. IC A 11C '. !1 R DE 4 JLC B 5 k DE VlC EOIC C 1 IHhf lEl EED E E ETT P P I E E E E LI E A' C FEET L 5 V Y 0 E cEUFJ HEIHI1 o f fi, 'JN co ;JA T UEToe s'E. oe P BEEFL n NVFLA'I D o EDI HE F ED o �E� NINE ERfO L i O A lAl ER LBEffJE [P il. i0.b.Rpb "� IFIC L ESP ECED CC III THE {AL1 IEEOIIIE IF USJ+ E'' JCE CE t IF LA, I',JSC�%E 1 'J C EA PI I f EE OCE ER CODE DA UNIT CCEPI EBYILI -H.III AJ111 ,RE1 Ell, �q(+H•�,i Pt . I1(R .'MIETFIll)O1 PFF IFC-` IIEEFIFY, ORBRANLHES .tD..OLPCC' .L kENTE11' S JIFF E IS EJC \. III �pR D FAINC c ISESIHALL eEEFAIRE1,ITH11C CGr EIPECI THE FICITE SHIFT xE FEEL CMR CA Cc OT11G111AI AAS'C Qm CEO Vtly+'eep3j W .A eo 4 -'!�'Y •ada o � 11 IF nn FII,,r 11.1 -BI BB Sn 1.1 IP Con nr I .Chan. f..CI eEl coca coa. se. ky.e...aee /.a 11, l ” .L l .- NA. n 1 1IRIlN3 NAIRIQ:,S I LIGHTING NOTE Lo_AIION Or RO OSE' LG {IDG 11 IQ'D C V C C4 LY: 111.TO EFFIC, LE CE I G El FOR f+AL1-PE C ETON F'RNG ANDA ND SECCAG ITO+.- OF MOUND )SCAPE CALCULATIONS HAIII 'Cl 1<0 PlES V dYORY FEES C(:IJIFERDDS4RC£5=<I Ian.] %+i-� 4mIBAUD PERELFAII INH", TOT..Lsneues=vz lAC.1 FILE, IIIIIIIR key notes O EI PRP ECE .0 C 5 BES 11IIII-HTFLI,IHIIEI, M1CA4OpC5 REUf D CH A tV l0.}'IEP F i1HPELEI,EEDEREVEdEA uNOEf. ALL PLANT DA BE, ,S. O ADD ALTERNATE D RG IF O OS `E LE O E S t E 11 TIO C F CC RGEDIET TO CEG O R G P( fC100 O IE J VO Eo_fa JDESOPDe cC - E AA: D oN. T E c E c E E LCc rII Po CO" Ton. EE i O -B G S T. 11 C O PFJ IEO E PR i0 L SOC FCFO EP 41 CLLCPILL I e I.UALAJ nI:FIG I..I.1 :c SYSTfN0 road lanting notes do Fit t ilome NC EfE.COR IF 11 11111HAINTE. "INCH, di<� l 0 ICTAIII IFFAIlIfIll. SH E DL1 C OFEEJ. .AH,FIIICNREFIFAA_ 1 [l IF"111IO1S LL BE 1111, HAIFORP 11 7 OIA, i ES I.CO FE'HI DITTECEINNINE1.C 1 D i IS i THE DSG F RC ECL V III CHH 11,11 1.1C.t 't G JL ^!CU E CKl EOV ATEAUHILHEA FAVATHELArIECCAPEAPECHANELI'IIC E CO J E AE L Cp ILcDE A E 1ED L G' F 1 IFTIN .rt II IC C'A SEEf E: NG U LL t C - T F CCFFTCO CEB THE 9 LLP BEGS L F CE Lra"G P , of REFER TO PECPC O fG PL J OC O AII,HP E3I Rb F 1 1 IIIII L BE OIEC EDA D II EO HE L TP C . oD F s cE E e o o F fol THE c to F e sC A IM s a EDF Lu of EG P IEE T xEET BE c ILA11 cc E eE I Ec o I PEOV E 15. IH. 'IE CESH LL LII ICI G. EEL C 5 PLANT..I t 5'B KPO LED 7 ST KE J J DEI A TER L RCE II CR C RE El' P PRO GI -DE. IC A 11C '. !1 R DE 4 JLC B 5 k DE VlC EOIC C 1 IHhf lEl EED E E ETT P P I E E E E LI E A' C FEET L 5 V Y rA o c ER.' En E SEF E,OAN wa Ev E cEUFJ HEIHI1 o f fi, 'JN co ;JA T UEToe s'E. oe P BEEFL n NVFLA'I D o EDI HE F ED o 1 R N EEI cD. EE REE FI BI JG I NINE ERfO L i O A lAl ER LBEffJE [P il. - lF LIG EUE C IFIC L ESP ECED CC III THE {AL1 IEEOIIIE IF USJ+ E'' JCE CE t IF LA, I',JSC�%E 1 'J C EA PI I f EE OCE ER CODE DA UNIT CCEPI EBYILI -H.III AJ111 ,RE1 Ell, OY.LLR E'TRAnELYHV LEAH"HER, 1111111 Ah OPC1 F.2 LDS i CAIO IA1,1 J tl. :-aCrITRO.]vR iN1i: YCDJP..Au of `.'nv.FEE'..O 'IINTCOEORDR E D,FLY 1 'TO' S': a4, El CHPC:. I.�f TVF-I LFF„.ACLF,,ABTO %R �v _ CEFLs4£ I1(R .'MIETFIll)O1 PFF IFC-` IIEEFIFY, ORBRANLHES .tD..OLPCC' .L kENTE11' S JIFF E IS EJC \. III 1 EACE'RACIC, E P'i AFEAALT.T hA7'IIBSAND III4U G3L ANFADUIJSIn VIII. h D FAINC c ISESIHALL eEEFAIRE1,ITH11C CGr EIPECI THE FICITE SHIFT xE FEEL CMR CA Cc OT11G111AI AAS'C Qm CEO 1E-� t 1 PLANING planting schedule REFERr R TO PAGE�LIJ 13,'LI.i PLANT SCHEDULE I O� u OOeo B .+�n 5] Ce �acc na /C. lac<ee T3 IF eo � 11 IF nn FII,,r 11.1 -BI BB Sn 1.1 IP Con nr I .Chan. f..CI eEl coca coa. se. ky.e...aee /.a 11, l ” .L l .- NA. n m.. ,_ AN E 0 .K .1, r a O, THEI �. 'A''F , A, -F— Coa TI IIII.- o P. X� on / Ogym, I. Fxf oc NAR... ;'ACOiLLE I LI, P_nP . sn>is/vxn Buea vi Tf1 ndsca e an o, 10'20F 40' :Rp REFER TO CP/IL FOR GRADING, LAYOUT, STORAANATER. U➢LPIESAND PAVEMENT DEFINITE IIIIIIII PAF nE JFEE _III \ \ Q O �pUAVIV 4d1I,FILE IDS HOS FG_ IlCc019 Y RAQI \ / aY 9y� ��I I ��•I Ln v / W R All Y ^Bf l.t l F V / Sbfi RH +Jhl h EC Ilc 11111 ITY1E ,] BEVry cul. 1 s BP ,Jp x m f d WAEll PAE u<IF j . I A a rv�S d. mrr.,.+ 12 CNmp s£IXCl YFaMN ' I; iJX3 �v d i 1 PRJ4�Aa llnnBPA ARf.T - • # Y REP!'AIU PRO EC,s6V - E ourtyard _ h, L-1' / OENCHI V ^i8 f ✓ I; BFC- EFLAG FOIE LA] - 1 1 E 5 IIEIIGIII �.I f k 2 5 N pl Cnr.E W o d� o v o IT L FIT BE, lic.,Ed� PWJtpu. � O D F9 nP entry enlargement: planting fi scale: 1" =10'-0" n courtyard enlargement: planting �► � scale: 1" =10'-0" IT lEFF11FI ITTIA - W H d FI, -11 O .a11I1,E,µ1 P, FJ ELL T--TEEl x I - T TE.P. W z O _. ¢ Z E1,111 ,P 11m,,, M 1nTICITEFELLE'STILI 1.1o PLALEN1 Sl PET a 11-71L 1R_ IT x-.. Q ¢ � -11 IEF IT ILL J. n LIIALLI—EZES 'E 1 >aue FIT, Y L.5O1L 3 wo..cvau.. ' y..vvw auo+.. -..nn. fill . T1111 1411 :S • x .s.,m. INiFb[NA> conifer planting n decid. planting n shrub planting �<i;;,lE Jscale: nts t' g Y scale: nts �`�J scale: nts l lq'M I ,R'x iB'1" LVPMSp O s1FELBIT 61O1WELBEO 1p PO5i W/Y16'NLLEi wsmuuMalluowr Rr Srt'pY�'MLNOM BOl1B TRASH ENCLOSURE POST BASE PLATE TRASH ENCLOSURE PUN AT CORNER 1111101E mwrw eon. cMEVMrcao srtFl Posr z, ve' wmawuo ILeEfMMf WELpE0I0 sREt Ppsi TRACH ENCLOSURE INTERIOR ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE MERIOR ELEVATION irP=1'-p' ' rt'G4ti%MSBShEt rx'su�mv SBormM OE mnMEwxr PBE55xxf 1PFARp RnB PPEs91PF 111FARx2,6 1.11E HlLEp WI.. Pp515EiW CIX1CBFIE PIrEBINPNGRN 8Rn6 6PIIPOBIIE tYMBEP PICRFts W NP9PASF BFIWEENP16M1E16 s. r.l;a�wELo6o wLvax¢EosIFEL rveE f6aME TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION AT GATE z yr=vn' wrz.wfLoro BoutmGMlxvs r n. x e' Lo. MoramG wLralnrzo L11 AllPMoxoE wEaseasx al Fnc.MING. m. Bluss�Lo.wEvau¢EO GrETI wELosoro Bowan wrEunxwG wsP s.e�nu�wenEa awrx¢w6nMnreFrnnnlF TRASH ENCLOSURE PUN w^ a w a a U In<@ev=,mnroama a@�.=a=Ix.w�. m.,mv rtOk@naeM �=I�unEv1me hrvaolpe 6A@o1MLmewh B,wson e PrstrwEvaxisa BnEL>uev r. ,ve�wLvau¢EoslFnaxGLE - EVEPY%LRFIM. PIIE65UMF IPGIEn M. rH11 EF IId15 PFB PaxEL wmaxluo scesws z Eun rcM slay TRASH ENCLOSURE SECTION AT PANEL _ TRACH ENCLOSURE INTERIOR ELEVATION TRASH ENCLOSURE MERIOR ELEVATION irP=1'-p' ' rt'G4ti%MSBShEt rx'su�mv SBormM OE mnMEwxr PBE55xxf 1PFARp RnB PPEs91PF 111FARx2,6 1.11E HlLEp WI.. Pp515EiW CIX1CBFIE PIrEBINPNGRN 8Rn6 6PIIPOBIIE tYMBEP PICRFts W NP9PASF BFIWEENP16M1E16 s. r.l;a�wELo6o wLvax¢EosIFEL rveE f6aME TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATION AT GATE z yr=vn' wrz.wfLoro BoutmGMlxvs r n. x e' Lo. MoramG wLralnrzo L11 AllPMoxoE wEaseasx al Fnc.MING. m. Bluss�Lo.wEvau¢EO GrETI wELosoro Bowan wrEunxwG wsP s.e�nu�wenEa awrx¢w6nMnreFrnnnlF TRASH ENCLOSURE PUN w^ a w a a U In<@ev=,mnroama a@�.=a=Ix.w�. m.,mv rtOk@naeM �=I�unEv1me hrvaolpe 6A@o1MLmewh B,wson ft - FIRST FLOOR OEMOLFTION PLAN Z J d Z O Cn F � Q Z Q W w � O F"' x < CD CD Q (n � cn o � Z 0 On O w Y �N � 4 �� 0 z arv� bei. �sos SECDND RODfl DEMDLRIDN PIAN IIB'= PA' Z Q J d Z O h U:) O ~ Z w W o � ¢ F- 0 OC o Q a o z pr 0 0 C) Z n Q C7 J o � m O 2 Q� 0 d � oNp Q z a�g o.aa,�a THIRD FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN 1goA ,5� MEA A3-406 f00flTH FLOOR OEMropTON PLAN va-rs IM1e rtO ^eeMy phR Weehalen, 0.rtp vupervkpon ean�Mll em auLury � rtOSn rt4 ArtM1drclun&�We6✓. o�Ne h��Mmrceoh M .1. aoaF awN oennounoN vwN Z C/) Q F -- d Z z LU O H � O Q W Q C) C) C) z ac Q Cl Cl m p > f— Z w Y F— ZQ � ¢ o0 CL TYPE C - EXISTING EFFICIENCY- DEMOLITION "1-- 11 TYPE A3- MOOING 1 BEDROOM (CDNVEBTED FROM EFFICIENCY) -DEMOLITION ME Bi - EXISTING 2 BEDROOM - DEMOLITION TYPE A2-MTING 1 BEDROOM (ACCESSIBLE) - DEMOLITION TYPE Al - EXISTING 1 BEDROOM - DEMOLDION bA Mt'. f50B mpj z Q J d z H Q p z � lL p I J m I II w I � Q � d a � we�m� �Z O UOR Pum 8 m .1W, F- 71 UcJ Q G F— C) CL C LL cc U) CD ¢ Z LL ca C m Q � Z ZQ F- � o0 CL .1W, G>Z O A secoNo noxa auH a z z J W d c CD cc C) Q WCL Z cc C:)CD O W Z Q LD CD m CD L. 2i Z o� Q d � oNz m �2 THIPO Fl.ODP PUN U 0 Dae: G>f O z FOURTH FLOOR PIAN 1% -1m 0 sgrctl Q LU Cl - CD CD cc O Q J ZD ZD O o z li_ cQ C CD J ® J m O > � Z z w° 0 CL oN� POOF PIAN ONe; a 11 1VPE C-WSTING EFFICIEN6v 1VPE A3 -EXISTING 1 BEDROOM (CONVERTED FROM EFFICIENCY) v< -I -- ttPE S1-IXIBi1NG 2 BEDROOM yr=no WPE A2 - E)CS'RNG i BEDROOM ija'=rs ttPE Al - EXISTING 1 BEDROOM . ra. sNMe N Z ~ ¢ Z J W d tz Z cc: m ¢ m d Z Z W Q C7 J m p J F— ZQ � cr o0 CLo$o ¢ z a�� WPE A5 -NEW I BEDROOM WPE B4 -NEW 2 BEDROOM ACCESSIBLE (SIDE TRANSFER SHOWER) WPE B3- NEW 2 BEDROOM ACCESSIBLE (ROLL -IN SHOWER) til'-ld 1/1'>ld" WOE A4 - NEW I BEDROOM aim WPE 32 -NEW 2 BEDROOM VI'Fiw' N.NNB C/) z F-- < Q Z J W d. H F -- az --Z [[ Z Q C C7 Q z Z w Q C3 J o J J cc < a da. be M, �50p COMIIUNINROOM �n�woav a=tm' gnetllMnnsF uns pYn,,peclkabn. gaovm er q. o,��ae,gw auvi,m,mM m TOMHOMES- FOUNDATION PLANS ..-+w' D <�3 v lw RT. II'll 11- O TIWNROMES - 11111 11001 PUNS r46 Ae..A�. Em AG.S P�5 D C: z 0 TOWNHOMES � SECOND FLOOR FLANS fI8'a 1W' b.R 65ueE, 45NY16 b 41b-. f5Y9 s9nro TOMF0MES ROOF PLANS ______ r7.-. 0 -. rosmy+s PauavE nrm PEnACFxWLc Axo Exu+E,rnceL. vAwl SOU WEFIOR ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATION iW dLIF'P 1q1 PO0+N OP e POOL PL9Nf! e FOM M ROW NRN e TDWIINIPV ,N O cEcouo Hoop Piuu D11TAWPPIAN B aA.PA s E-0.SPMAiWM1T SMN e PFtlOVE AND fiRucE POW"IAVE' cev IDI 'A"' M6et NEw AOOInON-ONE NEOPOO. 1.1, T'%W PflA OVE ANO.F'. 1m116. L 111 II.D11 ANP NWwx wwow+s. I.L Al.. ANO PEFucF .1 .1E1 TWILN f W f_ - U _ Q ADD, 0 o -- � '7 ¢rvx S u sox mwoWsea ,m a.. �� o.a. osAv+ ne w 7 LOP OI FL [V.1i0P PnM0 oB E11F�VI�TONi cFNP f Il\I pNPRWMN P. 'A � IPI' �® \fNLLWI1N NtlV --- AtWUMO14OMNANT alAS6 AiOPfEPO1MN�`A564MTAIx EowMrLoo rawo � im-r O n uIINNIINIIILIA 6 I I II I I ®C I I i t I � I I I I I eAs*anPa PL.N e Wu�rcAao � E — — — — - Emnw; wuxnnTmx 60UTHWf6T ETTENIOP ELEVATION L2'H SOU WEFIOR ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATION iW dLIF'P 1q1 PO0+N OP e POOL PL9Nf! e FOM M ROW NRN e TDWIINIPV ,N O cEcouo Hoop Piuu D11TAWPPIAN B aA.PA s E-0.SPMAiWM1T SMN e PFtlOVE AND fiRucE POW"IAVE' cev IDI 'A"' M6et NEw AOOInON-ONE NEOPOO. 1.1, T'%W PflA OVE ANO.F'. 1m116. L 111 II.D11 ANP NWwx wwow+s. I.L Al.. ANO PEFucF .1 .1E1 TWILN f W f_ - U _ Q ADD, 0 o -- � '7 ¢rvx S u sox mwoWsea ,m a.. �� o.a. osAv+ ne w 7 IOP n1 EIEVaiM NOC 'A, ...All MEPUOE NBOE°AauHmDIAID 1 A.,iwlxAL NEW... BUp.10)nvo OEWOCN ITIS. 1. NN ITA 6 rvEwnoo nou $ncx aF lNTWOBpoRDDM Imre NEWADTRNry 1111DONNNIMI.TI.l \4 D NIMIMEFNE NEVULE AllIWCeE NEVY MEEIxuHFI METAL$DIPPER AND DTAfNEOUr. TRIUE \A�.t—`��. � _\ j EouaMrloOPPISNN e LJ — ENUOMFANDRFPULE.lN.$. irelAl mlxo aooe xAu Q �i �� aEMovFAxo REPULE ML$LrevE, mmol ID\ � � I Lc01pUN a TW $tILL04 NNH BY$nM, 119IW1 easnmce Puu C__________ -----------j --______j— _ _ _ — _ _ _ ._ _ _ — — — — — — ------------ ------_____________ EAST EXTERIOR ELEVAl10N U) eLEVPnDNcoxswo _ € Z Z F W t— mucnox LED r W cc x W Q iOxor ElelA=ORRowo UE ® � $REENENE. MICFI. ID moi/ a cc rvEwxooF PPRwFl usnxo rrscw, TYPICAL � ?�, W C) NooFPinx � Z Q NFWADDIncN- NIEBEI10DUNR,IWGAE LX B O o O NEEDwAxo NP0G 61DREERWr Q J J wwoaw, , 11 MIGiL J Lb Q � Y Q F Z W Nft41001110N 61�IX0l fq m'OB[nP00MVM=A _I � xEWADDI1NIN-SIAcx DrNITAGNEDRDOM INIIL. TYPICAL y fOVBnI4LW LEAD B W U E VnMyllo)Nhahn,5pw4evlM NfW SNBN fIN6H51ShM.1YPW.4 NEW BpINSMG.LL w N �axr �.a.�mrr"Y mIRDELooa rux a<<m �°o�.muw INrn+ry nEMOVEOAxeaepucEHVrmWmEIAL O .".MED - w° WI, pPwi `+ BPxcNBM NA -1.` WN'. 0P, FIBS1ROca PUN � CVVB ________ __ __ _ __ Li _ _L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ S , E M t � SOUTH GOURttAAN ELEVATION IOP n1 EIEVaiM NOC 'A, ...All MEPUOE NBOE°AauHmDIAID 1 A.,iwlxAL NEW... BUp.10)nvo OEWOCN ITIS. 1. NN ITA 6 rvEwnoo nou $ncx aF lNTWOBpoRDDM Imre NEWADTRNry 1111DONNNIMI.TI.l \4 D NIMIMEFNE NEVULE AllIWCeE NEVY MEEIxuHFI METAL$DIPPER AND DTAfNEOUr. TRIUE \A�.t—`��. � _\ j EouaMrloOPPISNN e LJ — ENUOMFANDRFPULE.lN.$. irelAl mlxo aooe xAu Q �i �� aEMovFAxo REPULE ML$LrevE, mmol ID\ � � I Lc01pUN a TW $tILL04 NNH BY$nM, 119IW1 easnmce Puu C__________ -----------j --______j— _ _ _ — _ _ _ ._ _ _ — — — — — — ------------ ------_____________ EAST EXTERIOR ELEVAl10N 3DB U) Z Z O W t— W cc W Q 0ca REMOT" ANERAMEPLNWNUMANTLTA0WIN t.NE.Ew At W MIM AND pP00 $REENENE. MICFI. ID moi/ 0 cc W C) Z NFWADDIncN- NIEBEI10DUNR,IWGAE LX O NEEDwAxo NP0G 61DREERWr Q J J wwoaw, , 11 MIGiL J Lb Q � F Z W xEWADDI1NIN-SIAcx DrNITAGNEDRDOM INIIL. TYPICAL y E w N 3DB THIM!LOBq PLP' e BF90Xp RWIP PIAN B ftp fl�up IBA'. A' PP9IPBO9 hAH � I CWNNPP� � Y 6' �_�______________ ________ _ _ _ _ pMiIIG fMINPPPON e WEST COURrvARp ELEVATION NORTH COURTYARD ELEVATION 0 iMalcar vla+ 0 pn Tmn r. na- EMlmwl 0 B ITDP-011.1 I Om. x1w noomox � ouE gEogooM wuT. 1YPIGL xE 1l 111111111v 111.ttP IL EBIG1PUElpx � - U �F Q _ Zf W O Z Z K W Y Q F _ s W U I— IM NA N�kMon. w cc +Ne Owe o�Ne 0 Q Om. x1w noomox � ouE gEogooM wuT. 1YPIGL xE 1l 111111111v 111.ttP IL EAST COURTYARD ELEVATION Zf Z Z O W F P- > I— w cc w Q gfIIBVE AXB gEPEALE gOOF pgggPET IAP )Hq FA$EN.IWIEAF ¢¢ _ 0 LL iOP OF FiEYnlOP g90Fp oB w --uEw PgFPwsrsB werAL scIrePEP grro om[m6veuT. megE W Q CJ KNE AowTp NIIIMQWIXTMCAL Q � J m 0 13u1T6R.IP1Ax me �---gluovAPxB alPucE blows, MwaL Z Y w wN PEMBVF AIN PEPLPEEWNWw6, MMAl L 2 ,6 BP6 q Om -11- A'-a'gP{LOOR n n Q Eszoo EA Elm 11111E uc uEEVE, muu XCE 1EaBn AxO 1BPUc1AwMIXIM axB suss uwTaxvulwml xlw rc. uwalxw Axo cuss s*o11FPoxT rvwcaL no^a. >e46.. wcaoo a"Ai � EAST COURTYARD ELEVATION 0 �NI6Opv 0 i1 tl��8'ISp'NEAPW e 11C. LEVA Ittl 6 s4' ® EOptl LptVON PLPN 0 B Ji0P 0i NORVF C 0 rtY xwf 0 0 0 FOUR UNIT TOWNHOUSE - EAST SIDE ELEVATION +A'= T -D• -BACK / \ FOUR UNIT TOWNHOUSE - WEST SIOE ELEVATION FOUR UNIT TOWNHOUSE - FRONT ELEVATION pee nD' Ve'mw' PPKW5NFU 6N(ET METAL ONlP IEA 11TWAt 11111 MILPL Rf P0pf 5VPPppT tlP�CNFIS YAWIEO. 11PIM11 SNMYiiS. TMISPI. YNehmsrveD vmhe exD vpwxsPDm. mlw FN, R. @Al pnw(Fb. r .L BDEP CEMENT SBINL, P.1wIE0. III iIB[A GEMINI TNG PIy1hD.TW4LL YNEIW1:11w wrvpnxs. rvpluE aMPpsrtE cpsuMxpuurtD. In Al 1.1F.SMO LOMPOMh NA61N6 h �E F 3 � � E � an w a �+I o ;- x _ tt v Itanpy [entry llwl M: phn, ape[Ikalon. Epe[Iwas pr¢partJ OV rte [�unke my suRrv¢on antl OW lama Ml� repkYrea prtM1R[1[Wm Re bwa p�Re 6Pu [I A11n[ewP I 0 (INi P004 5' 0 Rel BOffOFPPING 0 rtQ) sSl HI.. 17 0 �si Ptaoa Pixw 0 0 IiOPMfM➢XX SIX UNIT TOWNHOUSE -SOUTH SIDE ELEVATION SIX UNIT TOWNHOUSE - BALK ELEVATION 0 ijNl As°M e 101 BOSS BEFPING O o sroxo OrcL u�amm Puu 0 rt11111FIF.0 n.r SIX UNIT TOWNHOUSE- NORTH SIUE ELEVATION \ SIX UNIT TOWNHOUSE - FRONT ELEVATION t2'= rvo' s =ta �tl��PnCF � } IIp IP IId6 Bt IP B. O Ii XI FftONO EEtiEt � lt➢"S:b' fp S1fL00P P4N e 160'X' f7hi lOP OF MpIR16 e U _ W N - x 36 u a 1n .c o o a u IlrcrzbecmM Anitlb Pbrtxpalfinldn. encs vas°a�P�w mniam aauN �" SxXp A�Inneso6l uohrh xws ottle F Z cW C CO CO M LL Q Q Lu Q W cc C) o z � Q eGt FWF-- w J i O > W Z � wrzu. Z Q Z �E3zoo 0 mn. C) owo tumxx LOP VF ELEV4iN Pv0,tlI00 b. e 9 B B B �12 BDRM ADDITION (WEST- EAST) EXISTING CRAWL SPACE �Oi ElEVD 19P P0pi 6L±0 I 2 BORM(NORTH- SOUTH) tre'- ru r mP e(FLEV}lOP P00f 6IpB e ® (MI 1xY660G01NG C Rpl6Eenlup LEva sOUTHAoomNN(WEST EAST) ivV L". PO0f icor-:U0 � o' I POMPUX e E. FON . RONP PIBw MWf400P PL4M e 6E49NP ELBOPPNII fwsi noav Puw � OIIX ttPAF � N Z_ U . F- c u N P W is O e 4 O_ e - K - 4 E ' K U IMreOy eeMy Wimk pbn, sln[m[Yhry tre'Pn �: Prtnrew ean< ��na.�m .oe�wa m Ixm ian sm. m�nrennen o�x�meeyre of me w�erom sn�ea: U) Un Z LU Q G w U) ClQ U) z Q O � Z m Q 0 J m O p o.z O A i[FLCF9{OII POOE 61lB e IW OF REV±NPPBOi o v0 6 i I i awrvuXPa�Pux l O fnueix av°zsP o B wnviv fLw ie o B EI 0 0) AV66 BFP.NG INWB itv'P PUN B LNWD 0.06BPVN 1fY-f B IY �O' iit96ECOHX IEVEI 0 4EC01N FL WP MTN B 110'�S i�D' fEPONB iLv010A B 100` A' d meifmov mre O RBSL noovvuw O C011P IYFfi s BWPNP6 e NORTH AOOITION (WEST - E AST) y y0'=Iq' r mP e(FLEV}lOP P00f 6IpB e ® (MI 1xY660G01NG C Rpl6Eenlup LEva sOUTHAoomNN(WEST EAST) ivV L". PO0f icor-:U0 � o' I POMPUX e E. FON . RONP PIBw MWf400P PL4M e 6E49NP ELBOPPNII fwsi noav Puw � OIIX ttPAF � N Z_ U . F- c u N P W is O e 4 O_ e - K - 4 E ' K U IMreOy eeMy Wimk pbn, sln[m[Yhry tre'Pn �: Prtnrew ean< ��na.�m .oe�wa m Ixm ian sm. m�nrennen o�x�meeyre of me w�erom sn�ea: U) Un Z LU Q G w U) ClQ U) z Q O � Z m Q 0 J m O p o.z O (iH6)BLDG Seotion 6telrs 2 IMI MUOieNPIXB 9 Rm sEodls'tw@ tw -s rre' O ensrimivo ud RHnoP air aorcm 6 r. a' QH6)BLOGSBoAon IU1, (i H6)BLDGE BECiIDN FIFE WALLS IrH�PW4 5' RM tPn55X 0XM6 � IMI BEBPO IFVEt rwe. Hoop Pux Rm. taPm monx6 d Rw muss PE.PIXL. e mlli<�op ESE, a Sig p1111e.Illll e RHI SOP nri g011d6 e i..6. I ml.. dmms I w Z O F- C) U w c� z 0 Z) m N w C) 0 x z 0 F— Pe vn uns. il. I ��AL.14 I I I T �Inr C"Vi AIA 1 A I< I 2r \ 22 � \ - I I Or or ora kg� \ ,• ORiH LINE OF t0r 4 BLOCK 4 �. S86°4 T44"E 113.00 - m o f 7ry \\ d d� /I/ `t I _ IO r\ \ O \ / is J �\ -�1.0 win � W an Irv, IT cur \ S \ (J JJ Q CJ Ii,nr�Ftrv�� vv V nit f ^1(1NI LOT 1! BLOCK 1j' \ \ V N70 '36"W __-- , \ / \ �� n T V 1 jI°154 �mlz -g a 'AVO \ \ \ \ vJ 21 ad olo `�Ss=oe0 EXCEPTION `� \ « \ ,o - wo J is7 t-EswrH uNB of aE uoarH o \ 'n 2 cEr oFyor s. emcx N86°4744"W 251.75 5 _ " \ j°p42l, w b I I NmtH LNE eALsukrson0 AB DFUNeD— " Nv rL tN h.vr v n _ _ 1 � tVL U 1__ -- -- �� \ / iT&�?vl� IV `I 1 V - n n /� t n n '7-- __. -%.(\L lit . 11- `U bry oq OOJ IVI \J V 1 V V 1 I \ Rl1r ,�tP.b (5 pSa� a I I I v I I fa \ ., r lL:• / 0"b R5 V1 �Q r \ \ of JJY / to -y,. ✓ no PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 21, 33, 34 and 35, Black p Few Side Park: AL, Cracker's let Division, Mound, Mlnnetonk; Hennepin County. Minnesota, housing adjacent vacated one half of Cracker Avenue, ayourn, by vecatlon thereof. AND Lots 23, 24, 25 and 26, Block 1; Lots 22 and 23, Block 2; and that part of Lots 24, 25 and 26, Block 2, Iyine North of the street as Opens, and Lor, 4, 5, P. 2, B antl the North 1C feet of Lot 9, gl°ek 4, in closing adjacent 112 of Crocker Avenue and of Shady Lane vacated, Lakeside Perk, AL Crocke(s 1stDivision, Mound, Minnetonka, accordinfi g t0 e map or plat thereof on file or closest in tire office of he Register of Deeds of Hennepin County, M'mnezota. EXCEPTING TH EREFROM: All that part of the following described "act: Lt 456,]8 add the ..In ICf fl 9 BlockALakeside-Park ALC k 1tDivision, M dM ta. a—huria, to the do, pl thereof be file, and of d' he R f IS, Register f DrOplant andfor Hennepin County, h'hr Wtly ofF following dline Refunding at a pointthe North hf tiedL K, decade FA fell Dualialf, ofm West 1 Of Card Block 4thence run Southerly p III with.ad We. lifor distance'f129feet; thence Southeasterly to point -line draw, Parallel with and prod, C3 feet E arty of d We,, gb. Said point being d" 57 feelN h IY ofth South lof the North ID feet of sendl 9' thence run Southerly along said parallel line to the South Ide of sad North 10 feet and there term nal ng. Tog ether with that part of the first above tract not acquired herein, which Iles 50utM1voliply of Ne lnuaving described fine: Beginning at a point on the South line of said first above described tract distant 6 feet East of the above described line: thence secretively to a point on said described line distant 4 feet North of the South line of said first above described «aR and there terminating. LOTS 80,870 SQUARE FEET OR 1.856 ACRES R.O.w. 600 SQUARE FEET OR 0,014 ACRES TOTAL 81,470 SQUARE FEET OR 1.870 ACRES BEABINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OFTHE LOT 4, BLOCK 401 LAKESIDE PARK, AL, CROCKER'S 1ST DIVISION, MOUND, MINNETONKA WHICH 15 ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF 66'47'44" E DENOTES 1f2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND O DENOTES SET Illy INCH OPEN IRON FOUND, U NLE55 OTH EBWaE NOTED p SETMAGNETICNAIL Q DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT POUND N SCALE M FEET 0 30 60 90 e V N es O w> 3 ad to y�n m \ dr, m N to CC W W Z � W E cc Z Z ; W o ¢ o a - K M 0 W I N a Or ASAS �a� a i �pWO ren O ch I go of F or ofof Pasad z .. ad be PROJECT NO. 23199 SHEET _iFA KNOW All PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Housing and Redevelopment Autlmrdy of Mound Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation, owner of the following described property: Let' 11, 33, 34 and 35. Black 2, Lake Side Park: AL. Cents' I I" Division, Mound, Minnetonka, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including adjacent vacated one-half of Cocker Avenue, accruing by vacation thereof. AND Lorz 13, 24, 25 and 2f, Block 1.. Let, 22 and 23, Block 2; and that Part of let, 14, 25 and 16, Block 2, lg North of the street as opened and Lots q 5, 6, 7, 8 and the North 10 feet of Lot 9, Block a, ZudoX adjacent V2 of Crocker Avenue and of SM1ady Lane vacs ted Lakeside Park, A.E Crockei s lst Division, Mound, Minnetonka, according to the map or plat thereof an one ar of record in the office of the Register of Deeds of Hennepin County, Minnesota, EXCEPTING THEREFROM: All that part of the folimping described vacs Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and the North 10 feet of Lot 9, In Block 4, lakeside Park A.L.Cockers 1s1 DHiod, u Mond Minnesota, according to the map or plat thereof oa tyle and of record In the office of the ,together of Deeds in and for Henoepin County, which bes Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the North line of said lot 4, distant 7 0feet Easterly of the West line of said Black 4; mea" on Southerly para..I, with said west fare for a distance of Too feel; comae run SoUmA:tery to a point on a line drawn Parallel with and distant 13 feet Easterly Of said West fork said polo, being distant 57 feet Kennedy of the South line of the North to feet of said OF 9: [hence run Southerly along said parallel line to the South the of said North 10 feet and there terminating. Together IT of the first tract orad herein, which lies Southwester. of the g par acq y fmlaw.ng described Ilhe'. Col®r dng at a point on the South line of said first above described tract distant 6 feet Co. of the above described fm e; thence Fremont to a point on said described line distant 4 feet Nonh of the South Into afford first above described tract and there referendum,. Ha' caused the Same to be surveyed and platted as INDIAN KNOLL MANOR and does hereby dedicate o the public for public use the public ways and the drainage and uu ey easements as created on this plat - .n witness whereof said Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Mound Minnesota, A Minnesota ... heati-Yr he, caused these presents to be signed byda Proper officer this _day of 20 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Mound, Minnesota By: STATE OF COUNTS OF The instrument wax acknowledged before me an_ day of ,20 , W ,the of Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Mound Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the c umater, County, Printed Name My commission..pines Marcus F, Hampton do hereby ramify that this plat was prepared by me or under my dual supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor m the State of Minnesota; that tM1e plat is A for act representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are mrrell, designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be currently set within one year; that all water boundaries and wetlands, as deform in Minnesota Statute; Section 505 01, Subd.of [M1e date o(ihiz cerufcale are shown and labeled on this pia; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Marcus F. Hampton, Licensed Land Smveyop Minnesota License No 47481 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF _.. This instrument was acknowledged before me on this For, of 20 by Marcus F. Hampton. Courcy, Printed Name Me larnonavoi, miPeres I .... ry 3l, CRY COUNCIL, CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA This plat of INDIAN KNOLL MANOR was approved by the City Crump of the City of Ramsey, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this day of ,20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statute, 5e111Rn 505.03, Subd. 2. BY: LT\I IVL_ JI oPµ 0 27 S *4E 113.86*4 44 A G 1 \ 1h" rr \ / O\ "15"TET At A In I \ \ \ \ !Q I fir'\E A \ � \ rill r ^I�NI LOT 1, BLOCK 1 ' \\ \\\ « T ave I � I N / \ EXCEPTION w JLs v vvv / 50 \ I VI\ aSQ B", no i a 1 O r�� p5 �O � SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 90 e!W Ga 1.ZT j rL'I" uTM LIKE OE THE NaRTn tai FEFi Or LOT 9, BLOCK a I N86'47' 44"W ryORM LWf OF 94LSA Qj7 J5 ROAD 4\ o4 ly5 a f:r1L.�rl1 Vt AS OPENED \/ NiP'�„• \, \ IV 11141NV L_ ant I n 1 n I __ ALO. �O• sQ .,.. tic HENNEPIN COUNTVSURVEYOR I hereby Li that in., -,do... with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505DIl, Subd 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of ,20 By. Hennepin County Surveyor HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTYTAXATtON AND RECORDS minion". mine esota Statute; sminti 5o5.0Il, 5uhd. P, taxes payable in the year 20 on the end hereinbefore described have been paid Alm pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Seaion U212, there are no defnquum taxes and Imuff n entered thin _ day of 0 By: Director oepatlmem IN Property Town- and Records COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA Ready certify that his plat of INDIAN KNOLL MANOR was filed in the office of the Count, Recorder for public record 0n this day of ,20 o'dark and was duly filed In Book of Plat, Pigs ar as Dominent Number County Anoulm I v V l TVI �/ U V BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OFTHE LOT 4, BLOCK 4 OF LAKESIDE PARK, A.L. CROCKER5 IST DIVISION, MOUND, MINNETONKA WHICH IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OE 5 NN"'A" E Q DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON MONUMENT FOUND 0 DENOTES SET 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON FOUN D, U NLESS OTHERWISE NOTED A SET MAGNETIC NAIL 0Q DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND °°��O \ a/ A �4 � �ti Emm -32y a eye v HEIGHBfIISANp T = 3a0 ,a \ YloY h1 If— f to R "�/ NEN I. = mg L �x ^CL \`OX, �a aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" \ oM E LI anwnv �m._e Boa®r I CvmpanV, 3/ o tlof5IN UkIIIIIIII k 2- C } } "i\ v"Al z. t'Na o a ao p avve/2VI(UI '�.3ix Snx jExISE v BUILDING I NE --/ -32y a eye v HEIGHBfIISANp T = 3a0 ,a \ YloY h1 If— f to R "�/ NEN I. = mg F* m.. / \ V'7 ` N L p , CDti At I .css.v� F �$$�qp• c SCALE IN FEET 0 SO' a0' L �x ^CL to III aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" a - f s .I<. oM E LI anwnv �m._e Boa®r mzn10m.2 d—I CvmpanV, 3/ o tlof5IN UkIIIIIIII k 2- C } } "i\ v"Al z. t'Na o a ao p avve/2VI(UI '�.3ix Snx jExISE v BUILDING y' --/ LawEF Boat = IEAA YY >'eE mx xizas .,x / If Y-1, A'. ava lv h t I tl bG, / 9 pr:ez F* m.. / \ V'7 ` N L p , CDti At I .css.v� F �$$�qp• c SCALE IN FEET 0 SO' a0' SUBJECT PROPERTY gin. to III aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" a - f s .I<. oM E LI anwnv �m._e Boa®r mzn10m.2 d—I CvmpanV, 3/ o tlof5IN UkIIIIIIII k 2- C } } "i\ v"Al z. t'Na o a ao p avve/2VI(UI rt g Aa a11/ NEN 2V A.n I at,xar.aEl. I. h>� 0 Mas Asan / If Y-1, A'. ava lv h t I tl bG, lama. n. e.h, It" ® ZD III= Id rNP—IIIIw n n 11., I aem P .,,.voeM1 `�� M' ( eox n. MIch It. If $ne m IP Ines f N 71MtM, ,th tMtao ofth,I awes n -1 IoS ., wneh l er ClIttlotlIEoft, fub g areY MMrd-a u (1] a fee w n 'a of NttI.I1If M.d .v r iy 1-1 Ildd M-1 lo—dl 111 `r O C CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND MAGNETIC NAIL SET hSs, Awa Na — tlatea IAVLI]5 t Ia I—Eld Id, ff GROUND LIGHT IdFeM.mb a.¢e Pa ff Pop— I b n MIM my e a"tate Motp.eperty EPme,. an ms Ana IFA efo a rea.e.. ,-I ]3 1 3I ell- v e n? II Ifor-d' r.11-1-4ar veaI, GAS METER NE Ne. sea 11�1 It MIDI I, ...... I.—,) uee,. A,l Lnl h e y11 Ie e a 43 S. las ovnta5tate Ptl fka IT l>s .Fatal. 6 > ,1Tne aPlme PPaeawal aterp.ea F W'r. HAND HOLE Msnpten hem Tnle Cemmlemem I . Sll>3. 8 Su6na ry f MM ne evo -111, B1111 L un1 N, nnvtIIII.PI iltx � bra eo.ety ea .- naso( k .,EE ne Mvaton VIII -f. GAS VALVE / F* m.. / \ V'7 ` N L p , CDti At I .css.v� F �$$�qp• c SCALE IN FEET 0 SO' a0' 31A;a""i IVl�)vlvv,� / ,. \ / SUBJECT PROPERTY gin. to III aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" a - f s .I<. oM E LI anwnv �m._e Boa®r mzn10m.2 d—I CvmpanV, 3/ o tlof5IN UkIIIIIIII k 2- C } } "i\ v"Al z. t'Na o a ao p avve/2VI(UI rt g Aa a11/ NEN 31A;a""i IVl�)vlvv,� / ,. \ / SUBJECT PROPERTY gin. to III aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" a - f s .I<. oM E LI anwnv �m._e Boa®r mzn10m.2 d—I CvmpanV, 3/ o tlof5IN UkIIIIIIII k nTv, uha v. phr nm Tu naEe "n .p hereof on eo o s r 8X88 g Aro Oeeas of z. t'Na o a ao p avve/2VI(UI NNI EVRP xLi .REFROv: W A.n I at,xar.aEl. I. h>� 0 Mas Asan 11-11, f tl e If Y-1, A'. ava lv h t I tl bG, lama. n. e.h, It" ® ZD III= Id rNP—IIIIw n n 11., I aem P .,,.voeM1 `�� M' ( eox n. MIch It. If $ne IP Ines f N 71MtM, ,th tMtao ofth,I awes n -1 IoS ., wneh l er ClIttlotlIEoft, fub g tIM III, A 111-1-111111 MMrd-a u (1] a fee w n 'a of NttI.I1If M.d .v r A A mreva>O so?are 1-1 Ildd M-1 lo—dl 111 `r O C CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND MAGNETIC NAIL SET hSs, I 11M tlat—m bas Na — tlatea IAVLI]5 t Ia I—Eld Id, ff GROUND LIGHT IdFeM.mb a.¢e Pa ff Pop— I b n MIM my e a"tate Motp.eperty EPme,. an ms Ana IFA efo a rea.e.. ,-I ]3 1 3I ell- v e L`iY]i o Q roil II Ifor-d' r.11-1-4ar veaI, GAS METER NE Ne. sea 11�1 It MIDI I, ...... I.—,) uee,. A,l mTnal re MIblIhI e", e y11 Ie e a 43 S. las ovnta5tate Ptl fka IT l>s .Fatal. 6 > ,1Tne aPlme PPaeawal aterp.ea F W'r. HAND HOLE Msnpten hem Tnle Cemmlemem I . Sll>3. 8 Su6na ry f MM ne evo -111, B1111 L un1 N, nnvtIIII.PI (n eo.ety ea .- naso( k .,EE ne Mvaton VIII -f. GAS VALVE nML,A a >e mtMSP ASIA, 11. 1mr, P Tale u /,. 'n'.oe fdmo ,M, Prf,tM wmerov,vae aemm.M. oe eaeem..t. n=mx,. ad ssMdall d. II III ... Imeetne name..maerm¢amem ae meeesmeame e. Yff I III— I I I'd 111,, nu I.I.or r are nI, I-1 MIYw mMTe"E NE ....... a,reaF.6r.,hAlsllflea IIo n 0MY 1-110, e 5 1' rp20 If 0 M oMMI, s, If., I, L.,—ffA Id 1,;1111,, III a ea x. ssse e. d-1-1 a r F b h file A.e m III- IIIA. leaeeme P?x Peo P be mereeor Mott—, ` c q ^T f V I.,: I ,l S ICIAl .71 VI /V SURVEY NOTES gin. 2 The aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" 3 oM E LI anwnv �m._e Boa®r CvmpanV, r. a nTv, uha v. phr nm Tu naEe ¢ z. t'Na o a ao p avve/2VI(UI GO TABLEA NOTES W y I. h>� IF— Mas Asan tl tl ab If Y-1, A'. m lama. n. e.h, It" ® ZD are I aem P .,,.voeM1 `�� M' ( \ p m IN- MIM—Id II N v tIM III, A 111-1-111111 IRON SET u (1] a fA. Y111, FAIP N.s s al kzMzm..'`°mm."w w o 6 A A mreva>O so?are Z `r O C CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND MAGNETIC NAIL SET Et I 11M tlat—m bas Z �—I —Id—, Ifo GROUND LIGHT LL IL a"tate Motp.eperty EPme,. (nw L`iY]i o Q roil a GAS METER It mTnal re MIblIhI e", y 6 > ,1Tne aPlme PPaeawal aterp.ea F W'r. HAND HOLE V SO 8 Su6na ry f MM ne evo Z (n US GAS VALVE 3 M n e Q .ndt,ee t, ev F 2 ar vlvr If 01 zti Iv N F 6 TELEVISION PEDESTAL Id FLAGPOLE F _ I' / ,. VENT rj Its I m n/�3 CATCH BASIN 6 a a a her n v ebasetl a?noe P meu tty prevtlerstM1ar AUTO SPRINKLER ut"Y 3 N aeaae. m.e pE"r.Eer p.e xa=o a. =.Eenw,e to CERTIFICATION gin. utNeV aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" 3 evlavrnvvol?umxevrth mora¢wh.bvativg CvmpanV, r. a nTv, uha v. phr nm Tu naEe ¢ am 11 tl la 23.s (l.. lF ol ' 'fyl IF— Mas Asan 23199—IKM If Y-1, A'. m lama. n. e.h, It" l CI at I.Iddld 1,l De?. me le SIE are I aem P .,,.voeM1 O _ xnaras F. xamo-oM1 LIM 5-11, MNLm"a N14?el — LEGEND �z 0 IRON SET u (1] a • 1/2" OPEN IRON FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED any r� F i �' O C CAST IRON MONUMENT FOUND MAGNETIC NAIL SET y i Z JY POWER POLE GROUND LIGHT LL IL A LIGHT POLE L`iY]i o Q roil a GAS METER rj r 0 ELECTRIC METER "I 0 HAND HOLE y @ AIR CONDITIONER UNIT (n US GAS VALVE ¢ SIGN m TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEVISION PEDESTAL I FLAGPOLE F _ VENT rj O CATCH BASIN 6 IN AUTO SPRINKLER N GATE VALVE EXISTING ELEVATION HANDICAP PARKING STALL LANDSCAPE MATERIAL ASPHALTSURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LTJ RDCK SWALE p OVERHEAD POWER LINE E— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINET— UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE UNDERGROUND GAS LINERETAINING WALLSj R.- PARKING STALL COUNT L DENOTES EXCEPTION NUMBERI t FROM SCHEDULE B-PARTTWO E CERTIFICATION - xuo m..e,eta xe K e aye w.e.+. ev .m a�no.h ofmo?�a r�,l•a" LLC va a{en, br Ola xepub :1 ae CvmpanV, nTv, uha v. phr nm Tu naEe df.m b a merit, for tl la 23.s (l.. lF a r LMI-1 TIM, .. wo11k1, —,111 CAD FILE N1111.15 - 23199—IKM If Y-1, A'. lama. n. e.h, It" PROJECT NO. 23199-00 SHEET 1 OF xnaras F. xamo-oM1 LIM 5-11, MNLm"a N14?el — SITE PHOTOMETRIC PIAN IN U H U tt 1- 6 = N W < t'4, Q p ; I Y —'f K _ U mrmr cows un mi:d,�.:vur a*. e�ovaoa or �� f Bio o�.uaa- us d. euvere�o�,w ina �:m : cm ��a,�m n.., aoa maF�manaon z,ou oale' 04M!�6 eev. wo: z W 7-- F— H0 C) z N Q U S� w —1 j CD z m� � Y O �� o g z oo= wa,�aa. urm as[aPe. wev. of o&trm OS a5 :6 X50.9 158 CMAIIRON goals 7 � n �......w>._�_-�--:____ , ...� 4—•�.__—.__,. _.. _�.,. o'er SSR iSTi 5 msn6.,riF1: ,Y 9 U W 9 U W F U Q (n W O K Y Q U IA W ,C li pUn.SWONbellm. - v. e<w,moxmatt��ee,mv 1 ode I A dt, t unOe, lA¢Pv1ol Ae �AY 5 � vA Wle'. 05NL16 Prq. N4 AOMwtt z LU W Ci- Q 2 N cc U Z Q N U �J � w C o c z j m o Y WN 00 LfL10115FA1`P Il ll 0:.]1!16 u,i¢Isaet: 0505/16 1549 NOTE THESE ARE MELIMMARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINK DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM SOUTHEAST VIEW OF FOUR UNIT TOWNHOME BUILDING WRATIS SHOWN HERF. VIEW OF FOUR UNIT TOWNHOME BUILDING NOTE: THESE ARE PRELIMINARY DESIGN IDEAS. FINAL DESIGN MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN HERE. ■INDIAN KNOLL MANOR Aeon 06/28/2016 CERMAK RHOADES ARCHITECTS