The URL can be used to link to this page

79-04-24 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota AGENDA CM 79-124 CM 79-131 CM 79-132 CM 79-130 CM 79-134 CM 79-125 CM 79 CM 79-135 CM 79-126 CM 79-128 CM 79-127 CM 79-137 CM 79-136 Mound City Council April 24, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Minutes 2. Public Hearings pg, 1073-1078 Pg.1067-1072 A. Special Use Permits-Body Shop & Auto Repair at 4839 & 4853 Shoreline B. Sewer Extension & Street Improvement ~ Inverness Lane Pg. 1066 3. Bids - Aerial Ladder Truck (Will be out Monday) 4. Planning Commission Recommendation-Nonconforming Use-Tract A, RLS 1150 5. Streets Pg. 1057-1065 A. Montclair Road Widening PT' 1054-1056 B. Lakewood Lane pg? 1053 C. Drury Lane Requested Closing Pg. 1048-1052 ' D. Strafford Lane Pg. 1043-1047 E. Dove Lane Sewer Pg. 1039-1042 6. Engineering Contract Pg..1024~1038 7. Comments & Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 8. ParkCommission Recommendation Pg. 1021-1023 9. Permits A. Gambling Permi~ Pg. 1018~1020 B. Approval of Dock Permits for the 1979.Season Pg. 1001-1017 C. Shooting Permits Pg. 998~1000 10. Tax Forfeit Land - Part of Lot 12, Block 4, Pembroke Pg. 996-997 11. Payment of Bills 12. Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 964-995 13. Committee Reports Page 1079 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota AGENDA CM 79-124 CM 79-131 CM 79-132 CM 79-130 CM 79-134 CM 79-125 CM 79 CM 79-135 CM 79-126 CM 79-128 CM 79-127 CM 79-137 CM 79-136 Mound City Council April 24, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Minutes 2. Public Hearings .Pg, 1073-1078 Pg.1067-1072 A. Special Use Permits-Body Shop & Auto Repair at 4839 & 4853 Shoreline B. Sewer Extension & Street Improvement - Inverness Lane Pg. 1066 3. Bids - Aerial Ladder Truck (Will be out Monday) 4. Planning Commission Recommendation-Nonconforming Use-Tract A, RLS 1150 5. Streets Pg. 1057-1065 A. Montclair Road Widening Pg. 1054-1056 B. Lakewood Lane pg. 1053 C. Drury Lane Requested Closing Pg. 1048-1052 D. StraffOrd Lane Pg. 1043-1047 E. Dove Lane Sewer Pg. 1039-1042 6. Engineering Contract Pg..1024~1038 7. Cormments & Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 8. Park commission Recommendation Pg. 1021-1023 9. Permits A. Gambling Permi~ Pg. 1018-1020 B. Approval of Dock Permits for the 1979 Season Pg. 1001-1017 C. Shooting Permits Pg. 998-1000 10. Tax Forfeit Land - Part of Lot 12, Block 4, Pembroke Pg. 996-997 11. Payment of Bills 12. Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 964-995 13. Committee Reports Page 1079 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 23, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-139 SUBJECT: Bids - Aerial Ladder Truck Bids for one aerial ladder fire truck and equipment were received and opened Friday morning. Copies of the bids are attached. The Fire Department will have a report at Tuesday's meeting. BID SHEET ~FIR]E PUMPER TRUCK ~ WIN ELS~;ATING PI~TFOPu~ 7~ Ft. Tak~~e tion to Specifications .' and bidding a% Request of Fire Chief. ?SFt Custom Aerial Platform 1500GPMPamperunit Total Cost F.O.B. Mound, Minhesota Both units are stock units and subject t0 prior sale Bothunits per enclosed prints. Delivery Date Seo.~elow ' ~DELIVERY: .._89t5c)3.00 , - $ 292,693.00 Company MACK T~UC~S ! INC Terms., Net 30 after da]_ Address 2195 W. Cry Rd. 02 · Roseville. Minn. Pumper Nov. 79 Phone No. 633-~810 PlftformAug. 79 " Note: Truck bidders must complete all items on Pages 1, 2 and 3 entitled · "Information required from Bidder" and also list any and all exceptions on the last page. This bid form and Page 3 must be signed and delivery date specified. EQUIPmeNT NEEDED ON TRUCK Alternate No. 1 - Other Equipment Itemize on Page 22 As Aerial Platform is stock unit bein~ built, no changes can be made. Cost ' $ Included with unit. Alternate No. 2 - Alternate Equipment Itemize o~ Page 22 We are bidding- only on rope, wheel chocks and pompier belts. Cost $ Alternate No. 3 - OptiQnal Equipment - Itemize on Page 23 We are 9nly bidding on Generator Mtd,air system mtd and furnishing 21~7 Akron Cost $ nozzle. :8882.00 All would be retd. locally ..... __ / __ Company_ ~.,O.K TRUCgS: INC. Address .2195 W. Cry Rd, 02 Roseville, Mn Phone No. 633-4810 A certified check or bid ~nd equal to 5% of the total bid must accompany the bid. -The following oEtjongl...eq.~ipment to be bid separate: LADDERS: - Alternate No. 1 Ladders furnished shall be of aluminum. Ladders shall be as light as consistent with safety and shall be constructed of the best and most carefully selected material. Ladders shall be made as wide as possible consistent with their length. Extension ladders shall have stops, for fly ladders and automatic locks. Ladder length shall be the measured length when extended and not the sum of the length of the sections. Ladders furnished shall be as follows: Price: 1. One-thlfty foot aluminum ladder · , Zn~.l~Serl 2. Two-eighteen foot roof ladders One 16' and One 18 Pb. Included. ~.. One-ten foot collapsible ladder, mounted~~. Zncluded. Note: Mound will furnish two-l~$ foot ladders. These would not.be used as no changes can be made on stock unit. (See inclosed print. Ladders shall ~e so mounted so that they shall not extend beyond the bed of the:.trUck.' OTHER EQUIPMENT: -.Alternate No. 2' Price: .. Two - pick head axes -.6 lbs, Included Two - flat head axes - 6 lbs~ Included Included Two - crowbars - 50 inches One - claw tool Two Included Two - approved portable Fire Extinguishers, Fire Department type 20 lbs.', of variety to be suitable for use on Class A, B, and C fires, One 17#ABC and On,e ,~002 iucluded Four - electric hand lights, Commando #1225GB, with mountings No Bid Two - air trumpets mounted on top of cab Included Two.- six foot pike poles Two 16 Fi; Furnish in place of 6F% Two - eight foot. pik~ poles- Two - twelv~ fObt' pike pOles Two - scoop shovels Included .... Included Included 85.00 o5.oo 80.00 3oo.oo '125 feet madila rope, 5/8. inch diameter 125 feet manila rope, 3/4 inch diameter Four - wheel chocks Four - pompier belts OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT: -~ternate No. 3 The following optional equipment shall be separately priced in the Vendor's bid. Price Breathing ai~ system on tower 5000 watt generator (0nan) with Flo Pack mounted and wired in compartment I:O_r~_ ..O0 ~5oo.oo No Bid 800 feet of 4 inch Storz suppl.y line with one set of -hydrant and truck adapters. 6~b'feet'6f 2'1/2 inch double jacketed, cotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyro]ire Couplings. 350 feet of 1-1/2 inch double jacketed, cotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyrollte couplings. Three - 1-1/2 inch NST adjustable nozzles (Akron Turbojet) One - Stokes ~tretcher , One - 2-1/2. inch NST adjustable nozzle (Akron Turbojet) Two - explosion-proof exhaust fans (Supervac 16") Two - pump inlet to 4 inch snaptite adapters. Two - 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" NST cl&ppered siamese (~kron Style 262). ~' Two - complete sets - spanner wrench'es,' hydrant wrench and mounting plate - Akron. ' ' Four - MSA 30 minutes air 'pack pressure demand type With air tanks Four - MSA 30 minute air tanks Set of 2 hose bridges, model RHB-40 Ziamatic, ~or 4" hose rubber type. . One Akron Black Widow 1OOO GPM variable nozzle. for Deck Gun !! 382. O0 " '-Stroke " '==w .... ~ ' " Bore Number main bearings ' ?iston displacement Maximum torque Maximum horse power 2. Clutch: Make Diameter 3- Transmission: Make at at Torque capacity Mode l Effective lining area R.P.M. R.P.H. Torque capaclt~ 1. Front axle: Make Paver steering make Rear axle: Make Capecit~ Diameter over spline. 6. Springs: type Front capacity 7. Service brakes: ·type Parking brake type 8. Wheels: Type Mode l {lear ratio:~ Rev. 4. Model Model Model Gear ra(io Size Rear capacit~ Total lining area Total lining area Size (~) BID SHEET AERIAL TOWER FIRE PUMPER TRUCK WITH ELEVATING PLATFO~4 Per Specifications (Complete with Lights & Devices) $ 227,345.00 Alternate 1 & 2, Page 22 Alternate 3, Page 23 2,570.00 20,845.00 Total Cost F.O.B. Mound, Minnesota Signed Delivery Date 15 tO 18 month~ompany TermsNet. One-quarter Address $ 250,760.00 ..... ~-~Pr?§~d~ne sutPhen Corpor,~i0n ' - . ' . 7000'CblumbUs-~ysviiie ad. Amlin, Ohio 43002 downpayment requzred. See purchase agreement Phone No. 6!4-889-!0~5 " with bid. Note: Truck bidders must complete all items on Pages 1, 2 and 3 entitled "Information required from Bidder" and also list any 'and all exceptions on the last page. This bid form and Page 3 must be signed and delivery date specified. .EQU!.Pt.4ENT NEEDED ON .TRUCK Alternate No. 1 - Other Equipment Itemize on Page 22 Cost $ Alternate No. 2 - Alternate Equipment Itemize on Page 22 1,100.00 Cost $ 1,470.00 Alternate No. 3 - Optional Equipment - Itemize on Page 23 Cost Signed Compan~ President Sutphen cor~o6ration Address 7000 Columbus~-Marysville Rd. Amlin, Ohi'o 430D2 Phone No. 614-889-1005 A certified check or bid bond equal to 5% of the total bid must accompany the bid. .The ~p.l.l~ing opt. i,onal eq. ui.pment to be bid separate: LADDERS: - Alternate No. 1 Ladders furnished shall be of aluminum. Ladders shal] be as light as consistent with safety and shall be constructed of.the best and most carefully selected material. Ladders shall be made as wide as possible consistent with their length. Extension ladders shal] have stops for fly ladders and automatic locks. Ladder l'ength shall be the measured length when extended and not the sum of the length of the sections. Ladders furnished shall be as follows: 1. One-thirty foot aluminum ladde~ Price: $500.00 ' $500.00 2. Two-eighteen foot roof ladders 3.. One-ten foot collapsible ladder, mounted in fly section of boom $100.00 Note: Mound will furnish two-45 foot ladders. Ladders shall be so mounted so that they shall not extend beyond the bed of the truck. OTHER EQUIPMENT: - Alternate No. 2' Price: Two - pick head axes .6 lbs. $ 55.00 Two - flat head axes 6 lbs~ "' 55.00 Two - crowbars - 50 inches One - claw tool 65 O0 80;00 140.00 130.00 Two - approved portable Fire Extinguishers, Fire Department type 20 lbs., of variety to be suitable for use on Class A, B, and C fires. Four - electric hand lights, Commando #1225GB, with mountings Two - air trumpets mounted on top of'cab 220.00 Two - six foot pike poles Two - eight foot pike poles Two - twelve fbbt pike"poles 40.00 50.00 .......... 80..00 50.OO 35.00 3O.00 120.06 320.00 Two - scoop shovels '125 feet maflila rope, 5/8. inch diameter 125 feet manila rope, 3/4 ~nch diameter Four - wheel chocks Four - pompier belts OPTIONAL £QUIPMENT: - Alternate No. 3 The fol. lowing optional equipment shall be separately priced in the vendor's bid. Price Breathing aiP system on tower $1,700.00 5000 watt generator (Onan) with Flo Pack mounted and wired in compartment : 6,500.00 800 feet of 4 inch Storz supply line with one set of .hydrant and truck adapters. : 6OO'feet'6f 2;1/2 inch double jacketed, dotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyrolite couplings. '350 feet of 1-1/2 inch. doubl~ jacketed, cotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyrolite couplings. Three - 1-1/2 inch'NST adjustable nozzles (Akron Turbojet) 4,500.00 1,'350.00 500.00 700.00 80.00 ... 280.00 800.00 One - Stokes stretcher . -.. One - 2-1/2. inch NST adjustable nozzle (Akron Turbojet) Two - explosion-proof exhaust fans (Supervac 16"). Two - pump inlet to 4- inch snaptite adapters. ~vo - 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" NST clSppered siamese (Akroh Style 262}. 175. O0 350.00 60.00 2,800.00 65.0.00 400.00 Two - complete sets - spanner wrench'es, hydrant wrench and mounting pl. at, e - Akron, Four ' MSA 30 minutes air'pack pressure demand type ~l|th air tanks . · Four - MSA 30 minute air tanks Set of 2 hose bridges, model RHB-40 Ziamatic, for 4" hose rubber type, .. INFOI~MATI(~;~ REQUIRED FROM B EngiNe: Mai<e Detroit Diesel 8V-71N Mode ! 8V- 71N Bore 425 St roke 5 Piston displacement 568 Number main bearings 5 Maximum torque 818 ft. lb. at 1400 R.P.M. Maximum horse power 316 Clutch: Not applicable 2300 Torque capacl ty~ R.P.M. Make Diameter Transmission: Model ' Effective lining area Make Detroit Diesel Allison Torque capacity 1. 3. 692 1200 2. 2.021 Model HT-740-D Gear ratio.s' Rev. 6.035 1.383 /~. 1.000 5. 4. Front axle: Make RoCkwell Power steering make Ross Model FL-931 Model HPS 76 5. Rear axle: Make Rockwell Capacity 38,000' Diameter over splin.e. Mode 1 SQHD Gear ral~io ' 6. Springs: type semi-elliptic leaf· 'Size 4.63 Front capacityl' 18,000 . Service brakes: type air Parking brak~ type Spring-brake Rear capacitx Total .i.in.ing. a.rea Total iinlng area 38,000 1280 8. Wheels: Type cask spoke Size 20 in- ., ///z ['NFORI4~TION REQUIRED FROM 9. 'Tires: Front make Rear make 10. Dimensions: Wheelbase 11. Alternator: Make 12. - continued Michelin S i ze Goodyear S i ze 240 Inches. Leece-Neville Model 8032AA Size 140 amp Hale Single Stage Pump: Make Size 1500 GPM Service location: Parts location: 12:00 x 20 Tread 10:00 x 20 Tread conventional mud and snow Overal! _approx. 44 ft. (528) inches. Model QSMF-150 local Detroit Diesel dealer or Sutphen Corporation same 14. Line drawings of' proposed apparatus as specified yes '15. Frame size: 10 1/8 X 3 1/2 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. (i nc X 3./8 Kind of material Inez No. of-cros~me'mbers 5 Tensile' strength Section Modulus 63 92 ft. at 75° approx. 44 ft. Working height at' maximum elevation and extension Maximum horizontal reach 80 ft. Maximum overal! length in road trave] position Maximum overall height in road travel position approx. 9' 10" Maximum weight above cab line in road 'travel position 500# Maximu~ square foot coverage if buildin~l when center of turnl~able is located 32 feet from the wall of the building, see scrub drawings enclosed (2) /lil II~FORHATiON REQUi~ED FI~OM BI :R - continued Bidder proposes to furnish Fire Pub,per in full compliance with except as follows: We could use 56,000 G.V.W., howev.'.er, the truck wo~.l~ ride very rough'and we would prefer to use lighter rear springs,_making %he G.V.W. 52,000 lb. We do not use radiator..~huut~rs, but use the Posi-temp system. The 1,000 lb. payload on the 75 ft~ unit. 800 lb. payload on the 100+ unit, With ].ow rails 700 lb. payload on the 100+ with high rails. Signature Title Company, Tom $~tp]~ en .... / President ' ./ ' Sutphen Corporation Address 7000 Columbus-Marysville Rd ........ Amlin, Ohio 43002 (3) BID SHEET AERIAL TOWER FIRE.pUMPER TRUCK WITH ELEVATING PLATFORM 100 Foot %Vater Tower Per Specifications (Complete.with Lights & Devices) $225,220.00 $231,275oO0 $206~5OO.OO One (1) 1OO' Water To%vet (Demo) One (1) 85' ;rater Tower - Alternate Total Cost F.O.B. Mound, Minnesota Delivery Date 14 - 16 Months $ Company FSERCE MANU~AC~JRING, Inc. Terms SEE LETTER Address P.O. BOX 2017 APPLETON, WISCOMSIN 54913 Phone No. 414-731-5251 Note: Truck bidders must complete all items on ~ages 1, 2 and 3 entitled "Information required from Bidder" and also list any and all exceptions on the last.page. This bid form and Page 3 must be signed and delivery dat~ specified. EQUIPMENT NEEDED ON TRUCK Alternate No, 1 - Other Equipment Itemize on Page 22 Cost $ % 105. O0 Alternate No. 2 - Alternate Equipment Itemize o~ Page 22 Cost $ % 384. O0 Alternate No. 3 -Optional Equipment - Itemize on Page 23 Cost $ SOME ITEMS. Company. ERCm'~ M..NU~ AC~JRIi'~.~, Inc. Address BOX 2017 APPLETON~ WiSCONSI~'. ~4913 Phone No. ~14-731-5251 A certified check or bid bond equal to 5% of the total bid must accompany the. bid. Thomas Fire Equipment "The Best In Fire Fighting Equipment - Buy Where You Get Service" BOX 92---RANDOLPH ROAD--DETROIT LAKES, MINN. $6501 JIM THOMAS PHONE: (218) 847-4171 April 20, 1979 Fire Fightin~ Apparatus PUMPER-$ N~INI-PUMPERS RESCUE UNITS AERIAL-ETT AERIAL LADDERS Honorable Mayor Members of City Council Mound, Minnesota Enclosed you will find the Bid of Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.~ on One (1) Aerial Tower Fire Pumper Truck with Elevating Platform'. We have Bid Three (3) Units at this'time. One (1) 100 Foot Water Tower per Specifications. enclosed. One (1) 85 Foot ~ater Tower as Per Specifications~.enclosed. One (1) 100 Foot ?;ater Tower Demo. Our Bid is based on you paying for the %~ater Tower when it is done at LTI (approx. 12 months) in the ~mount of $94,423.00. If you desire to pay at time of final delivery you must add $3,777.00. This is for 100 Foot Tower. The 85 Foot Tower pay- ment is explained on seperate sheet. If you would like to pay for the Chassis at time of delivery to Pierce (approx. 10 months) you may deduct $2,458.00 from our bid. Chassis Cost - ,~1,619.O0 Less deduct amt. $49,161.00. As you go thru our proposal you will find we exceed your Spec- ifications in many areas. If Pierce is awarded the Contract, you will receive drawings which you must approve, sign and return before construction begins. In t~is way you will know exactly what your Unit will look, like. You will find Pierce Equipment of highest quality, long lasting and very durable. i thank you for this opportunity to bid and look forward to meet- ing with you. Respectfully, JAT:st PI]~RC£ MAi~UFAC 2U:LING, Inc. I/o ' · INFO?JtATIO-N REQUIRED FROM BIDDER - continued Bidder proposes to fur, Fire Pumper in full complian~with except as follows: .... "'" "' 3ATEiQOUS PUMP MANUALS, TRUC]( MA~ALS ~ EL-Ct .PA~E 5 -LTI STANDARD ,.[A,~U~,I,o~ ~ TNICAL WIRING DIAGRAM, ETC. DELIVERY SHALL INCLUDE A MAN FROM PIERC,. FOR T~;O (2) DAYS AND A MAN FROH LTI .OR THREE (3) DAYS. PAGE 6 - ;VE HAVE BID A 200 GALIDN WATER TANK - PIERCE STANDARD ~,ViTH A TEN (10) YEAR ','IARRANTY. SEE ~NCLOomD BROC,qURE. PAGE 6 - ¢;E HAVE BID A 8V?iN DETROIT ENGINE Wi{ICH IS RATED 'AT 328 HORSE- POWER WITH THE OPTION OF A 8V71TA RATED ~A~:-370 ,HORSEPO;~R. ADD $1,O64.OO FOR 8V71TA IF YOU DESIRE. PAGE 7 - DETROIT'S NEW COOLING o,o~,, UTILIZES A BETTER Ti{E~,IOSTAT AND ~'~'- , ....... ~, Mn,;,m~t=,o IF THEY RADIATOR ~,nUTT~Ro ARE NOT NOR~,,_~LI,Y USED. _,~,,.~ ARE RE.RUiRED, 'THE OPTION 'IS AVaILAB~.=. ADD $273.00. PAGE 9 - Tile MARS 888 M,~Y HAVE TO BE MOUNTED ON A PoD=oTAL, DEPENDING ON ROOM. PAGE 9 - PIERCE USED A STANDARD ARRO;V TYPE STOP, TU~ AND BRAKE LIGHT AT REAR. PAGE 10- WE ARE USING R$440 srJSP~NoION WHICH IS THE RUBBER SUSPENSION. PAGE 11- FRAME - WE DON' T RE.~UIRE ~ LARumR FRAME RBM OR SI", BECAUSE· WE '-" '~ ,~ ~,,E CHASSIS iS ONLY A TORQUE .BOX FOR AERIAL D~VIC~ ,~krD T~ FRA;/,E '07 ~= A TRANSPORTER. PAGE 12- CHASSIS CAB - THE RO0.~ OF THE CAB IS INSULATED ONLY. PAINT - P~ERCE IMRON COLORS OR CENTARII LL TO MATCH YOUR PAINT COLOR. PAGE 15- DRAIN'COCKS ON GAUGES - WE DON' T NORMALLY USE DRAIN COCKS 'AS OUR GAUGES DRAIN BACK ~[RU PUMP. PAGE 17- FLOODLIGiIT TO BE CH~JRC~'~VI..L~,. PAGE 18-. F~/EVATIN~--FmT~A~T~'~ - 7iS HAVe; BID TiLE LTI TRU~ 1~0 FOOT PLATFORM. Signature, ~ ~.~,. ~~ TOTAL EXCEPTION. SEE PROPOSAL. Title D~L.~R Company, Address PIERCE MANUFACTURING, Inc. Box 2017, APPLETON, WISCON.SIN 54913 (3) //o? INFORMA'I:ION i~QUIRED FROM B IDDI Engine: Make DETROIT i~or e 4~" Piston displacement 568 Model Stroke Number main bearings · Maximum torque - 818 at 1400 R.P,M, Maximum horse power Clutch: 328 at 230O R.P.M. Torque capacity Make Model Diameter Effective lining area o Transmi ss ion: Make D~TROIT ,~LLIoON Model HT740D Torque capacit~ 1300 I, 2. Gear ratio.s Rev. 3. 4. 5. Front axle: Make· ROCK.VELL Power steering make ROSS Model FL-93~ 5- Rear a.xlei Model HF-64 W/BOOSTER. Make ROCK?~ELL Capacity_ Diameter over spline. · F-STEEL Springs: 2 3/8- Model SSHD Gear ra~io''4.6} type R-RUSBER Size ? · 13 LEAF 41~" x 3" Front capacity 20~440 <~ GROUND Rear dapacity., _4,4,.~00.0 ~ GROUND 7. Service brakes: type Parking brake type 8. Wheels: Type CAST SPOF~ CAM SPRING TYPE Tota. J .l.in.ing ,a.rea 372 + 868 = 1240 Total lining area 868 F = 20" x 9" Size R = 20" x 8" (1) //o&, INFORNATI'ON REQUIRED FROM B ER - continued res: Front make MIOHELIN Size F20X PILOTE Tread XZZ I0. Rear make D i mens ions: GENERAL Size 10:00 × 20 - 14 Tread /,IUD & SNO;'; Wheelbase 24 B Inches. Overall 53 S inches. '11. Alternator: Make LN Model 8032 AA Size 140 12. Pump: 13. Make WATEROUS Size 1500 Service location: Parts location: Model CSU. PIERCE MFG., APPLETON WISCONSIN LTI AND PIERCE '14. Line drawings of proposed apparatus as specified Frame size: lQ 1/8 X 5 X Kind of material A 36 No. of crossmembers ST~ Working heigh~ at' maximum elevation and extension (inc~z%ed~LuS LINER Tensile strength 56,000- · Section Modulus 32.4 1OO ' 17. Maximum horizontal reach 7Q'-8" 18. Maximum overall length in road travel position 19. 'Maximum over'all height in road travel position 141 20. Maximum weight above cab line in road'travel position 10,pur~O~'~ 21. Maximum square foot coverage if building when center of turntable is located 32 feet from the wall of the building~ (2) .The foilowin,q 9Ptional~ e.q.u..ipm~pt to be bid separ.a, te: LADDERS: - Alternate No. 1 Ladders furnished shall be of aluminum. Ladders shall be as light as consistent with safety and shall be constructed of.the best and most carefully selected material. Ladders shall be made as wide as possible consistent with their length. Extension ladders shall have stops, for fly ladders and aptomatic locks. ' Note: Ladder l'ength shall be the measured 1eh§th when extended and not the sum of the length of the sections. Ladders furnished shall be as follows: Price: 1, 'One-thirty foot alumin'um ladde~ D~o-$a£ety 525B $665.00 2. Two-eighteen foot roof ladders " 87~A $330.00 " 585A 3.- One-ten foot collapsible ladder, mounted in fly section of boom $110,O0 Mound will furnish two-45 foot ladders. ' Ladders shall ~e so mounted so that they shall not'extend beyond the bed of the. truck. OTHER EQUIPI.1ENT: - Alternate No. 2 Price: Two - pick head axes -.6 lbs. Two - flat head axes - 6 lbs; $59.00 $59.00 Two- troy'bars- 50 i.nches $56.00 . One - claw tool $72.00- $133.00 Two - approved portable Fire Extinguishers, Fire Department type 20 lbs., ~f variety to be suitable for use on Class A, B, and C. fires. Four - electric hand lights, ~ommando ~1225GB, wi~h mountings$~4LOO Two - air trumpets mounted on top of'cab Two - six foot pike poles. Two - eight foot pik~ poles Two - twelve foot pike poles ~LREADY IN $61.00- $68.oo .. $?~;b0 ..... $32. O0 ' $32. oo $32.00 $167.O0 $393.00 Two - scoop shovels 125 feet mahila rope, 5/8. inch diameter 125 feet manila rope, 3/4 inch diameter Four - wheel chocks Four - pompier belts OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT: - Alternate No. 3 The followin§ optional equipment shall be separately priced in the vendor's bid. Price Breathlng aii-system on tower do~,4~ .~9- 5000 watt generator (0nan). with~_?lo pac~_~ounted and wired in compartment 800 feet of 4 inch Storz supply line with one set of -hydrant and truck adapters. Sl'lS1.oo $2,552.00 . 6Ob'feet'6f 2-1/2 inch double.jaqketed, cotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyrolite couplings. 350 feet of 1-1/2 inch double jacketed, cotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyrolite couplings. Three- 1-1/2 inch NST adjustable nozzles (Akron Turbojet) One - Stokes stretcher One - 2-1/2 inch NST adjustable nozzle (Akron Turbojet) Two - exploslon'-proof exhaust fans (Supervac 16")'. Two - pump inlet to 4 inch snaptite adapters. Two - 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" NST cl&ppered siamese (Akron Style 262). Two- complete sets - spanner wrenches., hydrant wrench and mounting plate - Akron. Four - MSA 30 minutes air'pack pressure demand type with air tanks Four - MSA 30 minute air tanks Set of 2 hos~ bridges, model RHB-40 Ziamatic, for 4" hose rubber type. N. B. N.B. N.B. N. B. - ' ~ ~ VACUUM FLOiV, HATKO, LOPKO "5- OCCK 3CR GAS OPERATED, INS TALLATION, 'CIRCUi T BP~EAKER PANEL (23) //z) 3 BID SHEET AERIAL TOWER FIRE PUMPER TRUCK WITH ELEVATING PLATFORM Per Specifications (Complete with Lights & Devices) Total Cost F.O.B. Mound, Minnesota Signed Delivery Date Compan~ Terms Address Phone No. Note: Truck bidders must complete all items on Pages 1, 2 and 3 entitled" "Information required from Bidder" and also list any and all exceptions on the last page. This bid form and Page 3 must be signed and delivery date specified. EQUIPMENT NEEDED ON TRUCK Alternate No. I - Other Equipment Itemize on Page 22 Cost $ NO BID Alternate No. 2 - Alternate Equipment Itemize on Page 22 · Cos%Less items not bid $ 733.38 Alternate No. 3 - Optional Equipment - Itemize on Page 23 Con,Less i~ms not bid ' $ Company Minnesota Pire, Inc. Address 2476 University Ave. S% Pau!,5~N. 55114 Phone No. 646-1374 A certified check or bid bond equal to 5% of the total bid must accompany the bid. ~The following op.tlonaOquipment to b? bid separate.: LADDERS: - Alternate No. 1 Ladders furnished shall be of aluminum. Ladders shall be as light as consistent with safety and shall be constructed of.the best and most carefully selected material. Ladders shall be made as wide'as possible consistent with their length. Extension ladders shall have stops, for fly ladders and automatic locks. Ladder ~ength shall be the measured length when extended and not the sum of the length of the sections. Ladders furnished shall be as follows: Price: One-thirty foot aluminum ladde/ No Bid 2. Two-eighteen foot roof ladders No Bid 3.. One-ten foot collapsible ladder, mounted in fly section of boom No Bid "Note: Mound will furnish two-45 foot ladders. Ladders shall be so mounted so that they shall not extend beyond the bed of the truck. OTHER' EQUIPMENT: - Alternate No. 2 Two - pick head axes -.6 lbs. Two - flat head axes - 6 lbs'. 'Two - crowbars - 50 inches Elkhart ~ 630 One - claw tool Akron # 50 Price: 27.30 26.O0 33.92 22.88 Two - approved portable Fire Extinguishers, Fire Department type 20 lbs.', of variety to be suitable for use on Class A, Bi and C fires. General TGP-2OD 85.00 Four - electric hand lights, Commando #1225GB, with mountings No Bid Two - air trumpets mounted on top of cab Two - six foot pike poles Fiber glass Two -eight foot pike poles Fiber glass Two - twelve foot pike poles Wood. Two - scoop shovels '125 feet mahila rope, 5/8. inch diameter 125 feet manila rope, 3/4 inch diameter Four - wheel chocks Medium size Four - pompler belts A~las 3-1 No Bid 6O.8O 67.20 -- 78.40 .... No Bid No ;Bid. No Bicl. 73.80 258.08 PRINTI:'I3 IN' ' ~ c:' ~ ....... (22) /1o/ OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT: -iternate No. 3 'The fol. lowing optional equipment shall be'separately priced in the vendor's b~d. Price Breathing. ai~ system on tower No Bid 5000 watt generator (Onan) with Flo Pack mounted and wired in compartment No Bid 800 feet of 4 inch Storz supply llne with one set of .hydrant and truck adapters. 600'feet'6f 2=1/2 inch double jac.keted,'cotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyrolite couplings.lOO~ Byn%he%io D J~600~ Test with Red Head or.equal Alum Cplgs '350 feet of 1-1/2 inch double jacketed, cotton fire hose, stamped and dated, NST, pyrolite couplings.lOO~ Synthetio D J.,600~ Test,with Red Head or equal Alu~ Cplgs Three - 1-1/2 inch NST adjustable nozzles (Akron Turbojet) Style 1715 One - Stokes stretcher · ' 'Bridle for stokes stretcher One - 2-1/2 inch NST adjustable nozzle (Akron Turbojet) # 2730 Two - explosion-proof exhaust fans (Supervac 16") Two - pump inlet to 4 inch snaptite adapters. Two - 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" NST cl~ppered siamese (Akron Style 262).Ohrome Trim ,, , 355~.oo , 996..00 511.68 7~.~o 18.00 309,OO 712.5o !~1.2o 27~.64 50.56 2148.80 48o.oo 426.15 Two - complete sets - spanner wrench'es, hydrant wrench and mounting plate - Akron# 449' Four - MSA 30 minutes air pack pressure demand type With air tanks Four ' MSA 30 minute air tanks Set of 2 hose bridges, model RHB-40 Ziamatic, for 4" hose rubber type. (23) BID SHEET AERIAL TOWER FIRE PUMPER TRUCK WITH ELEVATING PLATFORM Per Specifications (Complete with Lights & Devices) Total Cost F.O.B. Mound, Minnesota Signed Delivery Date Company Terms Address Phone No. Note: Truck bidders must complete all items on Pages 1, 2 and 3 entitled "Information required from Bidder" and also list any and all exceptions on the last.page. This bid form and Page 3 must be signed and delivery date specified. EQUIPMENT NEEDED ON TRUCK Alternate No. 1 - Other Equipment Itemize on Page 22 Cost $ Alternate No. 2 - Alternate Equipment Itemize on Page 22 Cost $ Alternate No. 3 - Optional Equipment - Itemize on Page 23 $6033.50 Signed ~'~-'~~~g~ , / ~ 1965 ENGLISH SL Address ~T P ~'~ . ~t,L, ~ ........ 55iU9 Phone No. {~i2)- 776- 5320 A certified check or bid bond equal to 5% of the total bid must accompany the bid. ~PT!ONAL EQUIPMENT: - A][e.r. nat.e.,N0.,...3 The roi. Imping optional equJpment shall be separately 'Priced in the vendor's bid. Price Breathing. alP system on tower 5000 watt generator (Onan) with Flo Pack mounted and wired in compartment ~-a iRED SMOOTH COAT ~'2624 O0 800 feet of 4 inch Storz supply ]ine with one set ofk~ELLOW RUBBER COVER 3104]00 hydrant and truck adapters. TV/O STORZ ADAPTERS 1}2.O0 60]] feet' 6f 2-1/2 inch double jaqketed, cotton fire hos~LL POLYESTER 800 TEST stamped and dated, NST, pyro]ire couplings. 350 feet of 1-~/2 inch double j~cketed, cotton fire hose, ALL POLYESTER 800' TEST stamped and dated, NST,' pyro] ire coup] ings. $4!6. Three - 1-1/2 inch NST adjustable nozzles (Akron Turbojet) @ 200.00 One- Stokes stretcher One -'2-1/2 inch NST adjustable nozzle (Akron Turbojet) Two - explosion-proof exhaust fans (Supervac 16") Two - pump inlet to 4 inch snaptite adapters. @ 72.00 $600.00 O0 Two - 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" NST cl~ppered siamese (Akron Style 262). :' ,. @ 1%0. O0 Two - complete sets - spanner wrenches, hydrant wrench and mounting plate - Akron. Four - MSA 30 minutes air'pack pressure demand type with air tanks Four - MSA 30 minute a;r tanks Set of 2 hose bridges, model RHB-40 Ziamatic, for 4" hose rubber type. (2s) / o ? F LIOHT~EIOHT FIRE HOSE 81G FLOW COUPLINGS AND ADAPTERS large diameter fire hose I * NO DRYING i : * NO ROT OR MILDEW i * SMALL COIL DIAMETER i' * THREE PLY CONSTRUCTION I . :.'i. * SYNTHETIC RUBBER LINER STORZ COUPLING WITH ~., * POLYESTER JACKET ' 2 BOLT QUICK ~ ~ ~ * OUTER - YELLOW SYNTHETIC 'ATTACHMENT CLAMP t ~ RUBBER OR RED PLASTIC ). ' COATING INSTALLED IN SECONDS ,' * HIGH HEAT RESISTANCE · CLAMP FITS ALL WIDE ) THREE GROOVE SHANKS I * FLEXIBLE WHEN COLD * REDUCES HOSE COSTS , ~ll;l~-~ ;~',l = 1~ KINKED TWICE-STILL FLOWS SUGGESTED HOSE PRICE LIST MEETS OR EXCEEDS NFPA ~196 COST YELLOW cOST RED ' COST RED COST HoSE ATTACHM TEST BURST SYN. RUBBER SMOOTH COAT RIBBED COAT SET WT/IO0' COUPLINGS PSI PSI 100' CPLD. 100' CPLD. 100' CPLD. COUPLINGS LBS. ~CLAMP 1~ NST 400 700 232.00 182.00 13.50 20 -.. 1~ NST 400 700 258.00 198.00 16.50 24 2~ NST 4O0 70O ~26.00 256.0023.0042 4" STORZ* 400 600 .460.00 388.00 56.00 70 4" 12 5" STORZ** 300 500 ... 570.00 120.00 HOSE SIZE 1½" 2" 3" 4" .00 "5"' .00 * 4" HOSE AVAILABLE IN 2½, 3½, 4,-- NST CPLGS OSWALD FIRE HOSE' ** 5" HOSE AVAILABLE IN 4" STORZ AND 4½ NST CPLGS. 196S ENGLISH ST. (612) 776-.5320 ST. PAUL. MINN. 6S~09 / ~ ~ ? 60LGG 'NNIIN 'qnvd OZ~G-9/_/_ (EL9) '.LS HSI1E)N3 G96L ::ISOH ::lal-I olvMso 3ISVqlVAV S3ZIS aNV saV3UH1 83H10 00'9I + 1SN .9-- 00'8 + ZSN ,,S O0'OZ$ ~NVHS ,,§ oh J-1SN %b oo-s95 ~NVHS ,,b oh J-ISN %b 3SON ,,§ ~ ,,b ~0~ 3dAi ~NVHS 9NIld~O3 NOIZ3nS 3IONVH 9NO1 ON3 U3d O0'OE$ SS39 S~NVHS UnO Ol O311IJ 38 NV3 '.9 ol ,,b S3ZIS 'S93AIMS UROA 00'9[ Ppg ±SN ,,9'--'0N3 U3d 00'8 PPg 00'0925 ~-±SN ,,%b 'Old3 - 3SON ,,9 '1~ 02 00'§I25 J-±SN ,,%b 'dld3 - 3SOH ,,~ 'lJ OZ iM3N 031dnoD3u AqISV3. ~ $]3AIM$ IHgI3MIHgI9 390NVH 9NOq . HIIM $gNIqd~O3 NNVHS NO a]m¢73 'dgd3 'S~90g - 3II3HINAg 99V NOI±Dfl$ IJO$ IH~I3MIH~I9 O~ '95 pup %I (]NV Z~OIS ,,b 9N0~1S ~lX3 - H3N3~M iM3N. iM3N. .O.O'I~ SSV~5 .......... O0'OZ$ ~ ISN %I 39ZZON .~ 3IIS¥1d 00'995 ,,~ oo'9~$ ,,~ dV3 aN3 Z~OIS 3aLu~ aoj papea~q3 aq ue3 ad~d ,,b oo'bzZ$ 00'89I$ J-ISN%2/2 03 ZaOIS ,,§ J-ISN%2/g o~ ZUOIS ,,~ 3S3NVI$ 0303ddV13 39GVqIVAV SOV3UH1 QNV S3ZIS U3HIO ~ 00'88, 00'98 O0'9Z O0'9Z 00'99 39VN3J BO 39VN ~'3ZIS ISN - B31~Vd~ 33 I U~,' d31S 9ns I oo'oss$ oo-szs$ oo'ozs$ [00'02 ~d¥-z~oms ,,~] J ISN 9 ISN ~1/ J ISN § Ol ~0 J 1SN %~ Z~01S ,,~ saq~u~9 £Luo sas~ ,,S -- 3AgVA AgJ~311nB Quotation NO. 'To Akins Fire Equipment Co. P. O. Box 247 Big Lake, Minnesota 55309 Phone (800) 652-9760 City of Mound 5341Maywood Rd.. Mound, Mn. 55364 Optional Equipment Bid for Aerial Tower Fire Truck Date _ _A.p_rA _1_ _ _2.0_ ,__1 ~ 7 9 Inquiry Date Inquiry No. Estimated From Delivery Receipt Of Order Terms F.O.B. To Be Shipped Via ~]~sman FOLLOW UP DATE In response to your inquiry, we submit the following Quotation. Quantity Stock Number/Description Price Per Amount Breathing air system No Bid 50000watt generator '-No Bid one set of hydrant and truck adapters 180 00 800 ft. 4" Rnaptite duralight, rubber lined, storz hose coupled in 100 ft. lenghts, 10 yr. guarantee 3560i'00 600 ft. 2½" double jacketed, cotton fire hose, NST, pyrolite couplings 1188 lO0!/ 350 ft.pyrolitel½" doublecouplingsJaCketed cotton fire hose, NST, 451 3 Akron turbojet #1715P 1¥' adjustable nozzle 537' 1 - Stoke~ stretacher with wood rack no brldle 89:00 1 Akron turbojet #2730 2~" adjustable nozzle ' 325 O0 2 Supervac 16" exhaust fans : 660 00 2 Pump inlet to 4" snaptite adapters ! 192 00 2 Akron #262 2¥' x 2¥' x 2~ siamese 270 i00 Other Information Please refer to the above Quotation Number when placing your order. Wilson Jones By / Quotation Quotation No. To Akins Fire Equipment Co. P. O. Box 247 Big Lake, Minnesota 55309 Phone (800) 652-9760 City of Mound page: 2 Bid on optional ~quipment Date m April 20, 1979 Inquiry Date Inquiry No. Estimated From Delivery Receipt of Order Terms To Be Shipped Via Salesman FOLLOW UP DATE In response to your inquiry, we submit the following Quotation. Quantity i StockNumber/Description j Price _ Per._ Amount 2 Elkhart complete sets of spanner wrenches, hydrant wrench and mounting plate .~ 79 4 MSA 30 minute air pack pressure demand with ~teel tanks 'without case , 2260 i 4 MSA 30 minute steel air tanks i 600 , ! Set of 2 hose bridges, model RHB-50 Ziamatic for 5" hose rubber type ! 455~ Total Other Information Please refer to the above Quotation Number when placing your order. Wilson Jones By © /Quotation 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 23, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-138 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit - Lot 8, Block 2, Dreamwood Roger Drews owns Lot 9, Block 2, Dreamwood and would like to purchase Lot 8 in order to make a buildable lot (see letter attached). A resolution authorizing the Mayor and Manager to purchase Lot 9, Block 2, Dreamwood at private ~ale is requested. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 23, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-42 SUBJECT: Liquor Store Lease The present lease on the Liquor Store expires in August. We have a stipu- lation in the lease that allows it to extend each year and the rent will be adjusted based on the cost of living: "(2) That Lessee may renew this lease annually for one-year periods after August 31, 1979, by paying the base rent plus an adjustment thereof. If the lessee renews the lease after said date, the annual rent shall be the base rent adjusted to the consumer price index as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor for the Twin City Area. Said index being 147.1 on June 30, 1974, which figure shall be the base figure for adjustment calculations, and the first renewal shall be based on the difference between said 147.1, and the figure determined for the area in June, 1979. Similar adjustments shall be made for yearly renewals thereafter. The lessee shall notify the Lessor in writing on or before July 1, of an inten- tion to' renew the lease." On January 1, 1979, Mr. Wolner said the cost of living index was 209.2 which means that as of that date, the rent would increase 42.2% for the next year. We are presently paying $575.00 per month plus taxes and assessments. The increase on the $575.00 would be $242.55 per month. The building owner is willing to renegotiate the lease and has asked that we make an offer. Are there any suggestions? The City is leasing 3404 square feet which means under the present lease, the City is paying $2.027 per square foot plus taxes and assessments. 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 23, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-43 SUBJECT: Mortgage Revenue Bonds Tad Jude is having a bill introduced for Mortgage Revenue Bonds in the amound of $20 million dollars for Mound. ON LAKE~ MINNETONKA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 INDIAN BURIAL. MOUNDS TELEPHONE i/). April 23, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Public Works Director Information Memos Street Lights. As requested by the Council I have been checking on the CED street lights nightly so that they can have a complete report on them at each Council meeting. On April 9th all of the lights on Shoreline Blvd. were out. I checked the breakers in the control box and £ouhd one to be blown on April lOth. This was reset and checked by myself and N.S.P. After the meeting that night I noticed they were all out a§ain. Drews Electric met with us on April llth and we found the problem to be ~ short under§round in the aluminum wire crossin9 Shoreline to the north side. We disconnected these wires so that the south side lights would continue to work. At this time the best price we can 9et to run a conduit under Shoreline to the other side is Sh.o0 a foot. It would be my recommendation to allow Public Works to 9et prices to run copper from Marion Lane to the south side of Shoreline and down that side to each of the four poles. Now that the frost is out of Commerce Blvd. I am makin9 arrangements with Dr~ws Electric to dig up the short by the Telephone Co. office. The date set for this providin9 it doesn't rain that day is April 30th. Welcome to Mound Signs,. The signs will be completed and picked up by us on Tuesday April 24th. If the Council wishes to have some type of ceremony with the installation of the first one they should set a date soon. We have to 9et the auger ready and have gas and telephone locations ahead of time. SUBJECT: Information Memos (Continued) Pa9e 2 Thomas & Sons They began bringin9 their equipment in on Monday, April 23rd. A clean up crew will begin work on punch list items April Phth. Weather permittin9 they are 9oin9 to start with installin9 the water main extension on Lan§don Lane and di9 out the roads to full width in Three Points on Wednesday, April 2~th. Buffalo Bituminous ! They say that they will begin settin9 up this week and should start work the week of April 30th. Road Restrictions The Public Works Department is 9oin9 to lift the restrictions effective midnight April 29th. Park~ The Public Works Department has removed all the upper buildin§s at Three Points Park. The lower concession stand is knocked down but after the rain last week we will need a short dryin9 period to haul it away. Island Park will be staked for 9radin§ in the second week of May. Sprin9 Clean-up The Public Works Department would like to recommend the week of May lhth for the City wide clean-up. Respectfully, Robert Shanley Public Works Director aS/ich CITY of MOUND April 23, 1979 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Park Commission The City Manager Contract with School Attached is a copy of a letter received from the School regarding prices for lifeguards and other activities. We should have apprOval of these items prior to entering into an agree- ment with the School. LLK/ms cc: City Council Chris Bollis Io '7 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 277 MOUND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5630 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 C, R. PETERSON, PRINCIPAL and COORDINATOR EMPLOYEE/STUDENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM Mr. Len Kopp, Manager City Of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear ten: I hope the information I include will serve your needs in workinE with your park and recreation committies. Mr. Hanley will be our supervisor of playg{ound activities. Mr. Soule will no longer be associated with playground activities but will become the supervisor of league scheduling for Community Services. Costs to the City of Mound for possible services requested: Mobile rink attendant $4.60 per hour plus $.15 per mile on routes you establish WSI Trainer/Supervisor of Life Guards $6.15 per hour Life guard and/or Playground Leader $3.65 per hour Assistant Playground person and/or Facility Security person $3.40 per hour Total costs to the City of Mound for any contracted services would amount to the dollar per hour factor times the number of hours requested. There would be no fee for the supervision of playground staff as this position will be funded out of the community services levy. If you wish a youth employment service, community services would charge the city of Mound $2.00 for each Mound Youth who would register. Please let me know if you wish any of these services. MOUND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:TELEPHONE 612-4~-5263 / D,P'L April 17, 1979 Mr. Tim LoYaason, Mayor City of Mound 5~lMaywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Appointment Human Rights Commission. Dear Tim: With regrets I have to notify you that I will be unable to fulfill my appointment to the Human Rights Commission. I have enjoyed working with this commission and am sure I will miss it, however I will be making my new residence in Edina, Minnesota as of June 1st. Sincerely, 2360 Commerce Blvd. Mound, Minnesota 55364 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT AGENDA Regular Meeting, 8:00 p.m., Wednesda, yj April 25, $979 Gray Freshwater Biological ihstitute~ Navarre, Minnesota Call to Order Roll Call Minutes: March 28, 1979 Treasurer's Report A. Monthly Financial Report B. Bills Committee Reports A. Water Structures & Environment Committee (1) Public Hearing Report: Loring Acres Beach Assn. (2) Public Hearing Report: Cargill/Doherty (3) Code Amendment Review (100' Grandfather) (4) New Dock Licenses (5) 1979 Dock License Renewals (6) District Mooring Area Permits- (7) Environmental Reports (8) Other B. Lake Use Committee (1) Mile Test Course (2) Seton "Slow" Buoy Placement (3) Big Island Traffic (4) 1979 Consolidated Race Schedule (5) U.L.M.Y.C. 1979 Race Schedule (6) Comprehensive Plan-Program (7) 1979 Lake Use Study (8) Water Patrol Report (9) Other C. Code Amendment - 100' Grandfather (2nd Reading) 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment 4-20-79 LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT REGULAR}~ETING GRAY FRESHWATER BIOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, NAVARRE, MINNESOTA March 28, 1979 The regular meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District was called to order by Chairman Paurus at 8:05 p.m. Wednesday, March 28, 1979 at the Gray Freshwater Biological Institute, Navarre. CALL TO ORDER Members present: Thomas Maple (Deephaven), Jerry Johnson* (Excelsior), Robert Brown (Greenwood), Walton Clevenger (Minnetrista), Robert Polston (Mound), Norman Paurus (Orono), Robert Naegele (Shorewood), Frank Hunt (Spring Park), Ed Bauman (Tonka Bay), Robert MacNamara (Wayzata), and Robert Slocum (Woodland). Communities represented: Eleven (11). *Left early. Maple Moved, Bauman Seconded, that the minutes of the February 28, 1979 meeting, be approved. Motion, Ayes (11), Nays (0). ATTENDANCE MINUTES Bauman Moved, Johnson Seconded, that the Treasurer's Report be approved and the bills paid. Motion, Ayes (11), Nays (0). TREASURER'S REPORT WATER STRUCTURES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE: Brown reported that the com- mittee reviewed the public hearing reports for Baycliffe Homeowners Association's new dock license application, and for Herzog Acres Associ- ation's new dock license application, and made recommendations. Brown Moved, Naegele Seconded, that (1) the new dock license application for Baycliffe Homeowners Association, be approved; and (2) the new dock license application for Herzog Acres Association, be approved, subject to the east lot line's final settlement. Motion, Ayes (11), Nays (0). DOCK LICENSES: BAYCLIFFE & HERZOG The committee reviewed the public hearing report on Woodend Shores Beach Association's request for a DUA variance and a new dock license. The committee found that no hardship has been demonstrated, and that the plan submitted extended docks into the Lake a distance of 138', encroaches into the north setback area, and includes a central swimming area. The committee discussed: (1) the merits of granting a length variance, (2) the merits of grandfathering by ordinance amendment, (3) a variance possibly based on the hardship of crowding the installation in relation to side yard egress and ingress, and (4) the impact of the swimming area. The committee recommended (a) that Plan M with the necessary north side set- back variance, be approved, and (b) that the attorney draft the mechanism. Paurus further summarized the possible Board actions: Deny the variance (limiting the dock to 100' and eliminating the swimming area) Approve the variance (Plan M) to continue the dock at 138' by approving one of two methods: A. Approving the variance application as presented, based'on the hardship of side yard ingress and egress if docks were to be brought in further; or by B. Changing the Ordinance to grandfather. loft3 LMCD Board Minutes March 28, 1979 Page 2 Slocum Moved, Maple Seconded, that the variance application be de~ied and that the dock license application comply with existing ordinances. Roll Call, Ayes (7), Nays (4), Johnson, Clevenger, Polston and Naegele voting Nay. Johnson Moved, Bauman Seconded, that the first reading of the proposed Code amendment relating to grandfathering certain authorized dock use areas: Non commercial docks in existence on May 4, 1977, which extended into the Lake more than 100 feet but less than 200 feet shall be allowed to continue provided the dock structures are not used for the.storage of more watercraft than were authorized and stored at said structures on said date, and provided furkher that the Board may reduce the extension into the Lake authorized by this paragraph in exercising its discretion in licensing multiple docks and mooring areas under LMCD Code Section 3.08. be accepted and that the "Dock" Committee review the-proposed Ordinance. Roll Call, Ayes (8), Nays (3), Brown, Paurus and MacNamara voting Nay. Upon recommendation of the committee: Bauman Moved, Hunt Seconded, that District Mooring Area Permit renewal applications for Wayzata Yacht Club and for Methodist Lakeside Assembly Grounds, be approved. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). Hunt Moved, Bauman Seconded, that municipal and Hennepin County dock license applications, be approved, and that the fees be waived. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). Brown Moved, Bauman Seconded, that the 1979 dock license renewal appli- cation for Wayzata Yacht Club, be approved. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). Hunt Moved, Paurus Seconded, that the renewal of the 1979 dock license application for Frank Warner, be approved subject to receipt of the village certificate. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). Hunt Moved, Slocum Seconded, (1) that upon recommendation of the hearing panel, the 1979 new dock license application for Wayzata Yacht Club at Big Island, be approved~ and (2) that the Cargill/Doherty new dock license application be held for a dock plan showing no channel traffic interference. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). After review of. committee recommendations: Brown Moved, Bauman Seconded, that the variance Order for Shorewood Yacht Club, be approved. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). Brown Moved, Maple Seconded, that the variance Order for Minnetonka Boat Works at Wayzata, be approved. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). WOODEND SHORES VARIANCE PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT MOORING PERMITS MUNICIPAL FEE WAIVER 1979 DOCK LICENSES: W.Y.C. WARNER W.Y.C at BIG ISLAND CARGILL V~I~CE O~ERS: S.Y.C. BOAT WORKS LMCD Board Minutes March 28, 1979 Page 3 Brown Moved, Hunt Seconded, that the variance Order for Cochrane's Boatyard, be approved. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). The committee accepted for distribution the background report on the use of site lines extended to control the DUA. The committee reviewed and accepted the map indicating the 16 public launching ramp locations on the Lake. Brown Moved, Bauman Seconded, that the committee report as modified, be accepted. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). LAKE USE COMMITTEE: Bauman reported that the committee reviewed a letter of request from Cochrane's Boatyard to establish Excelsior Bay as a Quiet Waters area. After reviewing the history of two public hearings on the matter, and the need expressed earlier to determine the effects of com- mercial boat storage facilities established along the south shore, the committee wishes to recommend that the Board consider a Quiet Waters hearing for the Excelsior Bay area after the annual boat inspection trip in July. The committee discussed the benefit of (1) preparing annual overlays for District maps, marking accident locations; (2) continuing to develop the activity reporting system under discussion; (3) developing a program to gain public and boater acceptance of responsibility for water safety; and (4) acquainting the courts with the importance of water safety. Jack Eide has indicated the interest of the Power Squadron and Coast Guard Auxiliary in helping with the floating debris clea~up on the Lake. Boy Scouts are also to be contacted for possible assistance in debris removal from the water. News releases should be prepared to encourage shoreline cleanup this year. The committee accepted the District map indicating the 16 public launching ramp locations on the Lake. Polston Moved, Hunt Seconded, that the committee report, be accepted. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). CODE AMENDMENT: The proposed Code amendment relating to fees for variance applications, was read. Naegele Moved, MacNamara Seconded, that Ordinance No. 23, increasing variance application fees from $15 to $50, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). OTHER BUSINESS: Robert Mitchell, for Boulder Bridge, reported that the COCHRANE SITE LINES EXTENDED EXCELSIOR REPORTS FISHHOUSE CLEANb~P VARIANCE FEES LMCD Board Minutes March 28, 1979 Page4 DNR's public hearing on the channel dredging has been changed from April 3 to April 5, and is expected to include the state's authority to limit the number of docks at that location. Board members were encouraged to attend the hearings. Polston Moved, MacNamara Seconded, that Resolution No. 33, regarding up- dating the corporate authorization to transfer funds, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). Bauman Moved, Polston Seconded, that the purchase of the copy equipment presently leased, be approved. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). Maple Moved, Slocum Seconded, that Ordinance No. 24, correcting an error in Ordinance No. 18, be adopted. Motion, Ayes (9), Nays (0), Abstains (1), Brown abstaining. Hunt Moved, Bauman Seconded, that the annual salary of the Executive Director be increased annually effective 4-1-79, with another review in September. Motion, Ayes~(9), Nays (0), Abstains (1), Brown abstaining. ADJOURNMENT: MacNamara Moved, Bauman Seconded, at 10:20 p.m., that the meeting, be adjourned. Motion, Ayes (10), Nays (0). BOULDER BRIDGE DREDGING PERMIT FUNDS · DESIGNATION COPY MACHINE CORRECTING CODE SALARY ADJOURNED Submitted by: Jerry Johnson, Secretary Approved by: Norman W. Paurus, Chairman REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL April 3, 1979 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at'5341Maywood Road in said City on April 3, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson, Robert Polston and Benjamin Withhart. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Engineer Wm. McCombs and City Clerk MaEy H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of March 27, 1979 were presented for consideration. Swenson moved and'Polston seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meet- ing of March 27, 1979 with the following correction: Page 38 - Resolution 79-108, Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion. The vote was unanimously in favor. GLADSTONE LANE IMPROVEMENT The Council requested the staff work with the Mayer's regarding the problem on Gladstone Lane. Councilmember Ulrick arrlved at 7:50 p.m. BASS FISHING CONTEST Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-125 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL OF A BASS FISHING CONTEST TO BE HELD JUNE 9 AND 10, 1979 The vote was unanimously in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT No comments or,suggestions were presented at this time. TAX FORFEIT LAND Lots 17,18 & 19, Block 9, Whipple Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-126 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO PURCHASE LOTS 17, 18 AND 19, BLOCK 9, WHIPPLE FOR $3,090. The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-127 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO SELL TO J. LITTLE, OWNER OF LOT 18, BLOCK 9, WHIPPLE SHORES AND TO R. KOPP, OWNER OF LOT 16, BLOCK 9, WHIPPLE SHORES, LAND FOR A GARAGE SITE FOR $2,794 EACH, TOTAL $5,588 ~IITH CERTAIN STIPULATIONS. The vote was unanimously in favor. Aprll 3, 1979 ACTING CITY MANAGER ' Swenson moved and Polston seconded a mot;on RESOLUTION 79-128 RESOLUTION NAMING MARY H. MARSKE ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM APRIL 5, 1979 THROUGH APRIL 8, 1979 The vote was unanimously in favor. BINGO PERMIT Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion. RESOLUTION 79-129 RESOLUTION CHANGING THE DATE OF THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BINGO PERMIT FOR THE MOUND FIRE DEPART- MENT AUXILIARY FROM APRIL 3,1979 TO APRIL 10, 1979 The vote was unanimously in favor. PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Lbvaasen seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as pre~ented on the prelist in the amount of $27,853.13 where funds are avail- able. Roll call vote was un~nimbusly'in favor. INFORMATION MEMORANDUMS Other items discussed by the Council included: meeting with Minnetrista, mortgage revenue bonds information meeting, meeting with Spring Park regarding water service and current status of Beachside Development. 1979 STREET CONSTRUCTION - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-130 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING CONSTRUCTION AND ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS ,, TO BE OPENED MAY 17, 1979 AT 10:00 A.M. AND PRE- SENTED TO THE COUNCIL ON MAY 23, 1979 (:ouncilmember Ulrlck left at 10:00 p.m. The vote was four in favor with Councllmember Ulrick absent. ADJOURNMENT Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to adjourn to the next regular meeting on April IO, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor. Mary H. Marske, City Clerk/Treasurer Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager .Io77 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL April 10, 1979 Pursuant. to due call and notice thereof, a regular me,ting of the City Council of the City of Mound,.Nennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road. in said City on April 10,. 1979 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson, Benjamin Withhart and Robert Polston. Councilmember Ulrick was. absent and excused. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Attorney Jeffrey Strand and City Clerk Mary N.' Marske. PUBLIC NEARING Delinquent Utility Bills The City Clerk presented an ~ffidavit of publication in th~ Official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said delinquent utility bills. Said affi- davit was then examined, approve and ordered filed ih the office of the City The Hayor then opened the public hearing for input on said delinquent uti. lity .... bills and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. No persons'presented objections and the Hayor then closed the pbblic hearing. Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-131 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SHUT OFF SERVICE TO DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS. The vote was unanimously in favor. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Side Yard Variance - LOt 23 & 24, Block 9, Woodland Point Swenson moved ~nd Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-132 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GRANT THE SIDE YARD VARIANCE AS REQUESTED. The vote was unanimously in favor. ~ Special Use Permit - Lots 5, 18, 19 Part of 15, 16 & 17, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A PoJston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-133 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A SPECIAL. USE PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY AT 4853 SHORE- LINE BOULEVARD TO BE HEARD ON APRIL 24, 1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Street Front & Side Yard Variance - Non-conformLng Use Lot 18 & 19,. Block 1, Devon Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-134 RESOLUTION GRANTING THE EXPANDING OF A NON-CON- FORMING USE ALLOWING A THREE FOOT SIDE YARD VARIANCE AND STIPULATING THAT A MAINTENANCE PERMIT BE APPLIED FOR FROM THE PARK COMMISSION The vote was unanimously in favor. April 10, Lot size Variance - Part of Lot 22, Lafayette Park Po]ston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-135 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOHMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COHMISSlON TO APPROVE THE LOT SIZE VARIANCE. AS REQUESTED. The vote was unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land, Lot 21, Block 2, Shirley Hil. ls Unit F Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-136 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECONHENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'TO GRANT THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND AS REQUESTED. The vote was unanimously in favor. . Lot.Size Variance - Non-Conforming Use Lot'22, Block 1, L.P. Creviers Subd. of Lot 36, Lafayette Park Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-137 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH 'THE RECOHMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GRANT'THE LOT SIZE VARIANCE, The vote.was unanimously in favor. Non-Conformigg Use - Tract A, R.L.S. 1150 Swenson moved and Pol. ston seconded a motion to table this item. The vote was unanimously in favor.' Vacation of'Carnavon Lan~ Swen~on moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-138 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE VACATION OF CARNAVON LANE TO BE HEARD ON HAY 22, 1979 AT 7:30 The vote was unanimously in favor. Vacation of Kinross Road ... Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79~139 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR'A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE VACATION OF KINROSS ROAD TO BE HEARD ON MAY 22, 1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was~ unanimously in favor. Vacation of Stratford Lane The Council requested the staff to' send a l~tter to the petitioners to attend the meeting of May 22, 1979 to discuss this matter. Vacation of 5 Feet on Each Side of Shorewood Lane Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-140 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE VACATION OF 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF SHOREW00D LANE TO BE HEARD ON MAY 22, 1979 AT 7:30 P.M. T~e vote ~a$ unanimously in favor, April 10, 1979 .Request For Street.Opening - Windsor Road Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to table this item. The vote was unanimously in favor. The Council directed the staff to draw up an agreement with Mr. Gary Cable to allow a driveway opening to 'his property but stipulating it not be a public roadway. Drury Lane. Street ¢los'ure Lovaasen moved and Polston seconded a motion to table this item. The vote was unanimously in favor. DOCK PERMIT VARIANCE Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-141 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARK COMMISSION TO GRANT DOCK PERMITS 13660 AND 13690 The vote was unanimously in favor. TAX FORFEIT LAND' Lot 17, Block 7, Shadywood Point Withhart moved and Swenson seconded..a motion to table this item. The vote was unanimously in favor. Lots 17 & 18, Block 14, Seton Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-142 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO ACQUIRE THE NECESSARY EASEMENT FOR LOT 17 & 18, BLOCK 14, SETON The vote was..unanimously in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Dave Babler resident on Montclair raised his concern on the width of the streets in the 1979 street project. The Councll will discuss this matter further at the meeting of April 24, 1979. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS - SURFSIDE Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-143 RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY COOKS BAY ASSOCIATES UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT, AUTH- ORIZING SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SECURITIES FOR APPROVAL THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTS AND MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. The vote was unanimously in favor. ELEVATOR AT CITY HALL The Council determined to take no acLion on this item at this time. A~r|l 10, 1979 C.E.T.A. CONTRACT Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-144 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY C.E.T.A. The vote was unanimously in favor. DINNER DANCE PERMIT - SURFSIDE Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-145 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A DINNER DANCE PERMIT FOR THE SURFSIDE FROM APRIL 1,' 1979 THROUGH APRIL 30, 1979 The vote was unanimously in favor. TRANSFER OF FUNDS Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion -' RESOLUTION 79-146 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN CITY FUNDS. The vote was unanimously in favor. PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion to approve payment of bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of $24,~80.45 where funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. INFORMATION MEMORANDUMS Other items discussed by the Council included: City property division, Metro Waste-Control Commission metering, confiscated property and-the lights on Commerce Boulevard. UTILITY BILL ADJUSTMENT REQUEST - PIEPKORN Swenson moved and Poiston seconded a motion that no adjustment be made on the utility bill of Loren Piepkorn. The vote was unanimously in favor. LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-147 RESOLUTION PRESENTING OBJECTION TO SENATE FILE 513 AND HOUSE FILE 490 WHICH WOULD ELIMINATE 3.2 BEER IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA The vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNMENT Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn to the workshop meeting on April 17, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned. Mary H. Marske, City Clerk/Treasurer 7073 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 12, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-124 SUBJECT: Special Use Permits - Public Hearing Body Shop at 4839 Shoreline Boulevard (in the rear) Auto Repair at 4853 Shoreline Boulevard (in the rear) Lot 5, 18, 19 and Parts of 15, 16 & 17 and also Lots 6 to 11, inclusive and Part of 14, all in Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A - Zoned Commercial The applicant has a special use permit for an auto repair shop--see Resolution 76-371. The applicant wishes to rent the space used by the repair shop to an auto body repair operator and move the auto repair shop to a space now occupied as a warehouse. Presently the buildings are occupied as follows: 4839 Shoreline Boulevard - In front - Insurance Office In rear - Zeb's Repair 4851 Shoreline Boulevard - Progressive Cabinet Shop 4853 Shoreline Boulevard - In front - Travel Agency In rear - Warehouse The plan is to move Zeb's from the rear of 4839 to the rear of 4853 and put a body shop into the rear of 4839. In addition these buildings have a parking variance by requiring a review as occupants change (See Resolution 77-157). The change in occupants will have little or no effect on the parking. The Planning Commission recommended that adjacent property be encompassed to be included under special use permit, Resolution 76-371 (Broaden re- solution to cover both properties), waiving application and to amend Item 1 to read "no outside painting" with other conditions remaining unchanged; owner to provide a plan for the paved area and green area and show future expansion of blacktopped area as parking is required and this be contin- gent on any future special use permits that are issued. The building numbered "4839" now has a Special Use Permit for a repair shop. The permit has the following stipulations: 1. No spray painting 2. No sale of gasoline 3. No banners 4. All applicable Fire and Safety Codes be installed and complied. 5. No parts, material or accessories be store outside building. 6. Council reserves the right to require a hideaway fence. 7. The drive approach off Shoreline be signed "No Parking, Fire Lane". lo COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-124 Special Use Permits - Public Hearing - Page 2 The repair garage is to be moved to the building at 4853. The Planning Commission recommended the same stipulations stay on the repair garage. The body shop is to be moved into the space now ocCupied by the repair garage. The Planning Commission recommended the same stipulations as the repair garage except: Stipulation 1 be changed to read "No painting out-of-doors". Also they recommended the following regarding blacktopping: Smith moved and Renner seconded a motion to amend original motion to have owner provide a plan for the paved area and green area and show future expansion of blacktopped area as parking is required and this be contingent on any future special use permits that are issued. The vote on the amendment was unanimously in favor as was the vote on the motion as amended. At the April 9th Planning Commission meeting, they discussed the black- topping and directed that the following be transmitted to the Council for consideration: 1. Area should be blacktopped the way it was supposed to be in the first place as soon as possible. 2. The Planning Commission is cognizant of a financial bind and they are willing to work along with the owner. 3. In order to make sure, would like to have him present a plan showing how much and when he expects to do each part. 4. The Planning Commission would like to see the driveways and park- ing places that are being used blacktopped in 1979 and, in order to insure that, they would like him to post a bond. Attached is a copy of a plan for the blacktopping that has been proposed by the owner. In addition to the above, the Planning Commission was informed that Mr. Babler had called to remind the City that he had a body shop in the same block and that when he received his Special Use Permit, he was required to put up a 6 foot fence to hide the vehicles. The stipulations placed on Babler's Body Shop are as follows: 1. That all materials, cars and equipment be screened with a solid 6 foot fence. 2. There shall be no signs on the fence. 3. The fence shall not obstruct or have an adverse effect on traffic or traffic safety. 4. Rest room facilities shall be installed. 5. No parking of vehicles to be worked on stored outside the fence. 6. The building shall be kept in a neat and painted condition. 7. The building to be brought up to code. 8. No retail sale of gasoline or oil permitted. 9. .Pollution Control Agency's noise and order regulations be complied with. 10. Adequate light to provide protection to storage area, but not to disturb the neighborhood. 11. Work shall only be performed between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. ~ '~ %~-~eonard L. KoDD RESOLUTION NO. 76-371 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE AN AUTOMOBILE REPAIR BUSINESS ON LOTS 5, 18 AND 19 AND PARTS OF LOTS 15, 16 AND 17, BLOCK 1, SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT A, WITH STIPULATIONS WHEREAS, Lots 5, 18 and 19 and parts of Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A, are presently zoned commercial use district, and WTr~RFAS, application for special use permit to operate an automobile repair business therefore has been made pursuant to sections 23.07 d (4 and 5), Mound Code of Ordinances; the City Planning Commission has n~de favorable recommendation thereon, and ~.$,..Notice of Hearing of the application ~as duly published and hearing held thereon on September 22, 1976, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard, and only the proponent appeared thereon, and it appears in the public interest to gx~ant the same upon certain conditions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOUND, MOUND, MINIfESOTA: That permit for the use of Lots 5, 18 and 19, and Parts of Lots 15, 16'and 17, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A, be and hereby is, granted to operate an automobile repair business with the following stipulations: 1. No spray painting 2. No sale of gasoline No banners 4- All applicable Fire and Safety Codes be iustalled and complied. 5.- No parts, ma!erials or accessories be stored outside building. 6. Council reserves the right to require a hideaway fence 7- The drive approach off Shoreline be signed "No Parking, Fire Lane". Adopted by the Council this 22nd day of September, 1976. 4-12-77 RESOLUTION NO. 77 - 157 A R~ESOLUTiON GRANTING A SioECIAL USE PERMIT AND PAI~KING YARIANCE FOlK A COMMERCIAl, USE ON LOTS7 - 11 Incl, - Part of 6, 14, 18 Indl. Block 1 SHIRLEY HILLS UNIT "A" WHEREAS, Lots 7 - 1]~, Incl. Part of lots 6 and Lots 14 - 18 Incl. Block~l, Shirley Hills Unit A currently has a building located or~ the property and this Council has previously issued a Special Use Permit So operatc a cabinet Shop in said structure, and %VHEi{EAS, WHEt~EAS, the current owner desires to increase the size of the building to approximately 6, .370 square feet and under the provisions of Section 23.30 Subd 1 Subsection· (e) requires 3 sq. feet of g3arklng for each one square foot of. store floor area and tllis %voul~require 106 parking spaces, amd the ovrner of the property cgntends that his cabinet shop'. and. proposed po.rte .fY .manufactur'.n3g ancl sales office' do not. require the large number of par.king spec%es required by Section 23.3,0 Subd 1 Subsection (e) and that he would like to ]~uild the building and.provide a reasonable amount of .parkink and open space and green area %vhich will be more aesthestically at-k. racted to the community, and ~VHEREAS, the City Council is concerned th~a,t the property will be used for Commercial uses which require more parkin, g than is proposed or is in' effect able to be provided on the property and therefore the Council does not desire t to grant a Special Use Permit'and Variance which pro- vides less than one-half the number of spaces required unless the owner agrees that all future uses will be sub- mitred to this Council for review and/or the ovv-ner ~r~l conform to all existing parking requirements then qulred by the Zoning Ordinance. NOW, .THEREFORE: BE IT RESC~J.VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL O.~' THE CITY OF MOUND: The request tO construct a building of approximately ' 6, 370 sq. feet is granted subject· to ~ ' . the following ~con- dltion s: (a) The owner will provide 47 parking spaces and A attachdd hereto and made a part of this permit. The uses permitted in the building shall be - office space, a cabinet shop and a pottery manufacturing and sales shop. Any and all other uses in this s~ructure or any expansion of the exis'ting uses shall require an amend- rnent to this permit. 77- 157 4-12-77 (c) The oxvner must agree that any other uses proposed for this building .will be brought before this Council for review of the par~k- ing requirements and if the use requires, in the City Council's opinion, rnore than 47 spaces, the owner shall then provide' the required numlJer of sp~ces.. If the p~operty cannot provide the parking deemed necessary the owner agrees that the use will not be per- mitted in the building. No parking areas on public streets shall be counted in meeting the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance . (d) ~his Sp~ial Use perr~it co, ers the entire ' ' property and incOrporates conditions exist- : " 'lng in cu_rr,~nt out~stand~.g Special Use Permits. (e) ~ changes ~ use ~re to b~ referred to t~e ' ' ~an~ng ~ommisslon for recpmmend~tipn '. · .. ance sh~l be held. -- 2. 'Non~ of the uses on this property sha~ l~ave any outside :' storage or ~splaY areas. A 3' x 10' sign backed flush to the front of ~his buil~ng. -- 3. This Speci~ Use' Permit sh~l not become effec~ve the current ox~er has signed a copy. of this. resolutzon agreeing robe bo~d by ~he conditions contained in pA~a- .. graph 1 and Z and.he fur~er agrees to ~rovlde any new' .' % o~er with a copy of this resolutzon and agrees to. ~orm ~y new Purchaser of ~he ~pecial conditions %vhlch res~rlct . the uses of this property. .... Agreed to by peti~oner, Oswin ~ug 4851 ~oxel~e ~lv~. Mo~d,. ~. 5536~ 77-157 4-12-77 /Dh 7 - 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-131~ SUBJECT: Public Hearing Sewer Extension & Street Improvement - Inverness Lane A public hearing to consider extending the sewer on Inverness Lane from Hampton Road to Cumberland Road and to improve the street has been scheduled" for April 24th. The preliminary report was considered by the Council on March 27th, Council Memorandum No. 79-103 (Page 778). 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-132 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendation Non-Conforming Use Tract A, R.L.S. 1150 The subject item was tabled on April 10th and will be listed for discussion on April 24th. The area is zoned A-i Residential. Tract A has in excess of 21,000 square feet and previously had 3 dwellings on the lot. One dwelling holds two families and the third (near the Lakeshore) was a single family dwelling prior to a fire which took place on the property. Below is the information that appeared on the Council Memorandum for April 10th: Non-conforming Use Tract A, R.L.S. 1150 Zoned A-1 Residential 10,000 Square Feet The Planning Commission made no recommendation on the request to rebuild this structure. There presently exists on this lot a two family struc- ture. Whether or not the structure in question is more than 50% des- troyed is the question under the zoning ordinance as to whether it can be rebuilt or not. If less than 50%, it appears no variance is needed. The Building Inspector has had the Engineer make an appraisal (see copy attached). Also the City Attorney feels a more in-depth appraisal is necessary. The Building Inspector is checking on this. We have attached an appraisal made by the Assessor's Office that shows the building to be 50% destroyed. Prior to April 10th, the Inspector had an appraiser look at the building. A copy of his report is attached which shows it would cost $12,754 to rebuild the structure. In the appraiser's letter, he states that the rear masonry wall is not struc- turally adequate and that two parallel exterior masonry walls show extensive structural cracks. In his reconstruction cost, those items are not listed. The City Engineer, in his letter of March 29th, also referred to stress frac- tures in sublevel block walls. The County Appraiser's review of the dwelling on March 30th shows $7,669. damage to a structure originally valued at $15,338. ~-~)nard L. Kopp ALB.ANY. N. ~. ANCHORAGE, AL. ASKA ATLAN. TA, GA. HOME April 10, 1979 INSPECTION CONSULTANTS 55 NO. LEXINGTON PKWY. ST. PAUL, MINN. 55104 224-8300 HARRISBURG, PA. HOUSTON. TEXAS HUNTSVILLF.. ALA. LIVINGSTON, N, J. IdEMPHl$. TENN. NEW YORK, N. Y. ORLANDO. FLA. RICHMOND. VA, ST.LOUIS, MO, SEATTLE, WASH. Mr. Jeffrey J. Strand Attorney-at-Law LeFevere, Lefler, Pearson, O'Brien & Drawz 1100 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Re: Burned House ~ 5012 Tuxedo Blyd., Mound, Mn. Tract A, RLS 1150 Dear Mr. Strand: At the request of Henry Trvelson, Buildiug Inspector at Mound, Minnesota, I inspected the burned house as noted above on March 7, 1979. The purpose of the inspection was to note the structural damage to the house by a fire which occurred on May 5, 1978. I was also asked to estimate the cost to completely rehabilitate the house to its former condition based upon present day costs. While much of the house above the top of the foundation walls'was destroyed or made structurally inadequate because of the fire damage to major structural elements, other parts suffered water damage which could be considered for comp- lete rehabilitation. As a basis for my estimate I used a book called HOME TECH ESTL\~ATOR published by Home-Te~ Publications of Washington, D.C. It must be said here that extensive rehabilitative work to much of the structure has been initiated without obtaining a building permit. THE FOREGOING REPORT IS FURNISHED AT YOUR REQUEST IN STRICT CONFIDENCE BY US AS YOUR AGENT AND EMPLOYEE FOR YOUR EXCLUSIVE USE AS AN AID IN DETER- MINING THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE SUBJECT PREMISES. THIS REPORT IS INTENDED TO COVER ONLY SUCH PORTIONS OF THE PREMISES AND THE EQUIPMENT THEREIN AS MAY BE EX.a..MINED VISUALLY; AND WE WARN YOU THAT ALTHOUGH SUCH PREMISES AND/OR EQUIPMENT MAY BE IN GOOD CONDITION WHEN EXAMINED, THE CONDITION MAY CHANGE THEREAFTER. FURTHERMORE, THIS REPORT IS NOT TO BE USED AS A BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE VALUE OF SUCH PREMISES OR WHETHER SAME IS OR IS NOT TO BE PURCHASED. THIS REPORT IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY OF THE PREMISES OR EQUIPMENT THERIN OR OF THEIR FITNESS FOR USE. HOME AND BUILDING INSPECTION FOR THE HOME OWNER AND BUYER /~;~ ~_/ Z/~ Mr. Strand 2 While many of the remaining structural members have some structural integrity, in my professional opinion, I would not depend upon that integrity unless every structural member damaged or scorched by the fire would be subject to testing. Because testing would be impractical if not impossible, I am assuming that the entire frame portion of the house would be replaced. Also because the entire chim- ney developed serious structural cracks from the firet it would also have to be rebuilt. While my estimate, herewith will deal with the structural damage~erom +he~ ~e only, it must be stated that the building code says in Section 104 (b) that if additions,~ alterations and repairs exceed more than 50~of the value of an existin~ building or structure, such building or structure shall be made to conform to the requirements for new buildings or structures. It must be said here that if the estimate is more than 50%, the foundation walls and most of the structural framing and concrete masonry of the lower level would also have to be rebuilt. The following comments are herewith made from my notes on April 7, 1979 relative to the structural inadequacies as noted by my inspection. 1. 2x8 joists span 16'-0". Too great a span for 2x8's. Deck overhang in front of house is unsafe because the cantilever overhang is 7'-0" on the outside. The deck is anchored 5'-0" inside the building. This. type of construction does not conform to engineering practises. 3. Rear masonry wall not structurally adequate. 4. Two parallel exterior masonry walls show extensive structural cracks. Inadequate headers over all windows. 2x4's over kitchen area are nailed together at thecenter to make a structural joists. This is not an acceptable method of construction. Mr. Strand 3 ESTLV~ATE OF THE EXTENT OF D~L~GE OR RECONSTRUCTION RD~OVAL 1. INSTALLATION 4. ge 0 5 10. 11. 12. 13. Remove existing roofing, roof sheathing & rafters 30' x 32' ~ 0.54 $/S.F. Remove all exterior & interior walls ~6~ L.F. ~ 11.25 Remove joists & sub-floor 30 x 32' x 0.47 ~rst floor joists 30 x 32 x 2.10 Install sub-floor 30 x 32 x 0.80 Interior walls (brg. & non-brg.) 54 L.F. ~ 0.84 Roof framing 30 x-32 x 2.46 $/S.F. Install ceiling joists 3o x 32 x 1.7o $/s.F. Install asphalt shingles 30 x 32 x 0.65 $/S.F. Install sheathing & siding 992 S.F. G 0.93 $/S.F. Install ext. doors 2 ~ 218.00 Install int. doors 4 @ 79.00 Windows 8 @ 105.00 TOTAL ESTIMAT~D COST 518.00 1823.00 451.00 2016.00 768.OO 45.0o 2362.00 1632.00 624.00 923.00 436.00 316.00 840.00 12754.00 If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very tru_lj yours, Civil ~ Structurat~gineer Reg. No. 4832 CJZ/km March 29, 1979 Reply To: 12805 Olson f/l~mori31 Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 {612} 559-3700 Hank Truelson Building Inspector City of Mound 5341.Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound Burned House Tract A, RLS 1150 Dear Mr. Truelson: -On March '28, 1979, I looked at the house on Tract A, RLS 1150, which 'recently burnt. Virtually all of the structural members frOm th~ first floor level up ~¢ere damaged beyond repair. Many of these have been.replaced with new members since the fire. There are stress fractures in the sublevel block walls, but these were probably not'caused by the fire. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:sh cc: Curt Pearson Leonard Kopp Minneapolis ' Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls HC20~ Area , , Owner Address Area Code Subdivision Parcel COMPUTATIONS Extras: Fireplace Fireplace Range-Oven Dishwasher Disposal Baths Tile I ' I Finished Bsm't, W.O, Bsm't. Air Cond. Brick or Stone Trim __ Drive Fixt. Total Extras: Dimensions ~ X ~ f , X_ Sq. Ft. Rate Value Porch: : x = '@ = x = .@ = Extras: Total Repl~cement ~~____ Less Depreciation: Physical Functional Economic Net Value Garage: x x Total Less D~p. O£her Buildings Total Value Improvemeq~s Land Value Total: Totals CLAYTON L. LI:FEVERE HERBERT P. LEI'LEE CURTIS A.. PEARSON J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN E. DRAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B. DEAN GLENN E. PUROUE JAME.~ D. LARSON HERBERT Po LEFLEI~ MARY J. BJO~KLUND THOHA5 O. CREIGHTON LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER. PEARSON.O'BRIEN & DRAWZ I100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING HINNEAPOLI5, HINNESOTA 554-02 March 30, 1979 (Gl2) 333- 05.q.3 Mr. Henry Truelson, Building Inspector City of ~ound. 5341 ~..!aywood Road Moun¢!, Minnesota 55364 Re: Dear Henry: Burned House Tract A, RLS 1150 I have this morning received a copy of Lyle Swanson's 'letter to you und.er date of March 29, 1979. The letter does not go to the central question which is the amount of damage done to "the home by the fire. I call your attention to Section 23.20, Subd.. g, of the City Code which read. s as follows: "Any building which is partially damaned., or destroyed, by fire, earth ~uake, win~, storm, or explosion may be' reinstated to its former use, provided that no. building which does not conform to the requirements of the use district in which it is located., and. which is thus partially ~amaged or destroyed to the exten~ of 50% or more, may be rebuilt or reconstructed other than for purposes of conformity. Estimate of the extent of damaoe or construction shall be made by the village · council or its duly appointed agents." I am enclosing herewith photocopy of various cases where this question has been before the courts. I thought you might like this for light reading. Please no%.e that there must be exper~ ~es~imony that the building_, was destroyed to the extent of 50% or more. Host zoning ordinances'c!efine the 50% by assessed valuation, bulk, reasonable value, or some other standard, but our ordinance does not. I have therefore recommenc!ed to you tha't you get a professional appraisal of the value of the LAW L£FEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Page 2 Mr. Ilenry Truelson, Buildin~ Inspector March 30, 19'79 building prior to the fire, an appraisal of the value after %he fire, and an estimate of the costs of repair. Lyle, the assessor or any appraiser hired by the city to evaluate this home should keep in mind that they will be requested to express.a professional opinion as to the amount of d. amage which occurred, to this structure. Please proceed accordingly. Very truly yours, CAP: lh cc: Mr. Len Kopp Mr. Lyle Swanson Curtis A. Pearson, City Attorney 4-24 -79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 12, 1979 COUNCIL MEMOP~NDUM NO. 79-130 SUBJECT: Montclair Road The City has received a request to make Montclair Road into a 36 foot or 38 foot street rather than 28 feet wide as other streets° The City Council asked that this be listed for discussion at the April 24th Council meeting and that the abutting property owners be advised of the meeting so they can express their feelings on the matter. cc: Lyle Swanson D. Babler J. Glenn M. Barrett B. Barkley E. Lange Al-Anon Center McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINE£R$ · LAND SURVEYORS ~ SITE PLANNERS April 19, 1979 Reply To: 12805 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: citv of Mound 1979 Street Construction Montclair Dear Mr. Kopp: As requested we have looked at the mossibilitv of widening Montclair Lane to provide additional parking. The attached sketch shows one way this could be done. The street colored in red indicates the ~roDosed wideninq to 36 feet back to back of curb. The street cannot be widened across Lot 17 because of the buildinq location. There are a number of trees and shrubs on the west side of the street which would have to be removed if the street were widened in that direction. If the area in red were added it would add about 10 spaces of street Darkinq. The added cost of the proposed construction is estimated at $1,300. Verv trulv yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lvle Swanson, P.E. LS:sh Minneapolis ~ Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 18, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-134 SUBJECT: Lakewood Lane The residents of Lakewood Lane will be at the April 24th meeting to present a petition for a 24 foot wide street and realign the inter- section at Wilshire and Lakewood. Mr. Robert Hotvet will represent the residents. See copy of petition attached. 7, 1979 Mayor and City Council City of Mound Mound, MN. 5536q Gentlemen: The below signed residents and property owners of Lakewood Lane wish to state and conflrmthe following alterations to the proposed street construction being undertaken by the City of Mound. We propose that: 1) the per~nanent road be limited tO 2~ feet from back of curb to back of curb. ~. 2) the intersection of Lakewood Lane with Wilshire Blvd. be 2g feet wide and this Lakewood Lane intersection be constr~ction at a 90 degree angle with Wilshire Blvd. With respect to item number one, the na~Power street will: 1) save prime trees thus preserving the wooded characteristics of the neighbomhood. eliminate definite dmiveway entman6e problems caused by those residences at higher lot elevations. 3) be consistant with the quiet residential character of the area. The city has previously recognized concerns of other property owners regarding narrow street construction in a residential area, such as Emerald Lane and lower Lakewood Lane. With respect to item number two, the 90 degmee entry from Wilshire Blvd. onto Lakewood Lane will: 1) PrOvide defined entry lanes Reduce speed of ~raffic onto Lakewood Lane reduce a~terial traffic ~) provide for a ten foot side walk direct departure access to Shirley Bills School from the Northwest side of Lakewood Lane across Wilshlre Blvd. The submitted plans by the engineers provide fo~ this future sidewalk. The 90 degree entry from Lakewood Lane onto Nilshire Blvd. will slow down vehLS~etraffic, diminish arterial traffic, and present an orderly entry 'and departure for both vehicles a~dpedest~ians. We are concerned about the amount of traffic and the speed of traffic on upper Lakewood Lane. We are concerned about the safety of our children and the pedestrians that use the street. We do not want Lakewood Lane to become an arterial thoroughfare. Thank you, 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 12, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-125 SUBJECT: Drury Lane Requested Closing At the time of the Street Construction Hearing, a petition was presented the Council requesting that Drury Lane between Hampton Road and Cumber- land Road be closed. (A copy of the petition is attached.) The Planning Commission studied this request at their March meeting and recommended the street not be closed. The Public Works Director and Police Chief have recommended that the street not be closed. See copies of their reports attached. The Fire Chief has advised that he is opposed to closing any street. The petitioners have requested they be heard on this item. This will be listed for discussion on April 24th. cc: Petitioners 7 PETITION In accordance with Minnesota State Statues, Chapter h12.8~1, the below majority of property owners, of land adjacent to the one block length of Drury Lane, boardered between Hampton Road on the south and Cumberland Road on the north (See map attached)~ hereby petition the City Council and Street Maintainance Department of the City of Mound~ to permanently close this section of street to all motor vehicle traffic uses. DAe to its unusability in the winter from ice and snow resulting in extreme slipperyness; 'Its general rough condition in summer from rain wash, pot holes, rocks and muds Its blind access on to Hampton Road at the top of the hill; And its high use by neighborhood children for walking and riding bikes; It is unanimously deemed by the below signed property owners, a highly dangerous and unnecessary access for motor vehicle traffic~ NAME (Printed) ADDRESS SIGNATURE D~TE ON LAKE lgiNNE'TON~.A INDIAN J~URIAL MOUNJD~ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND~ MINNESOT~ 55364 {612) 472-1155 October 17, 1978 TO: FRO?,!: SU BJ ECT: ~ir. KOpp Public Uorks Director Stre~'h Closure at Drury & Har~pgon It is my feeling that this. one block piec~ of Drury not be closed for the fo!lowin9 reasons. This section is th:be curbed ~nd blacktopped in the 1979 project and it would see~ foolish to blDckgop it and not use it. Also if it was closed and nog black- topped we would have one block of gravel road-that will wash out into the project mtge, We also have sanitary sewer and water mains in this street that require maintenance, The people requesting this closure will still have easy access'to their homes but what about th¢ people south on Drury and Hampton that use this street £or access? This leaves them w[gh on.lyDevon hill from the norgh for access which is as s~eep or steeper. If they have to go around they will have to use Drury £rom Tuxedo or Donald which are just as steep,and £~rth~r away from their homes. As far as the children using it for walking and bike ridin9 that is a problem on all streets ~nd not a 9ood reason for closure of same street. Respzctfully, Robert Shanley Public Works Director RS/ion CITY of MOUND March 21, 1979 5341 MAYWOOO ROAD /3 MOUND, MIN/'ISSOTA 55364 {612) 472-1t55' TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Planning Commission The City Manager Request for Street Closures When the City Council held hearings on the street improvements (curb, gutters, etc.)' for 1979, requests were made to close several streets. One of the streets is Drury Lane from Hampton to Cumberland. Recommendations from Department Heads are: Pt~l. ic Works Director - See copy of letter attached. Police Chief: It is suggested the requested street closing on Drury be denied. From a public safety viewpoint, I believe this street is necessary in offering alternate routes through and around the top of the hill on that portion of land. Fire Chief: No reply to ~ate, but he has indicated that' he is opposed ~o closing any street. /,2,-/? '. --' RICHMOND DORCHESTER ROAD 3N 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota April 11~ 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-129 SUBJECT: Strafford Lane A request has been made to vacate one block of Strafford Lane from Manchester Road to Dorchester Road, The Planning Coiamission, Fire Department, Police Department and Public Works Department have recommended denial of the closing. The Council has requested this be listed for discussion on April 24th. CITY of MOUND March 19, 1979 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Planning Commission The City Manager Vacation of Stratford Lane between Manchester and Dorchester A request for the vacation of' one block of Stratford Lane has been requested: Comments received to date are: Continental Telephone - "We have no objection to vacating Stratford Lane between Manchester Lane and Dorchester Lane; we have no facilities located on this right-of-way and we cannot foresee any need for this right-of-way in the future". Public Works Director - "My recommendation on this closure request is to deny it. As I stated in my letter to Lyle Swanson on December 19, 1978, it would create a large problem in snow plowing. We would have to go to the end of Dorchester and turn sharply to the north to do the last portion of Stratford. At this.point, we would have to turn around in a private drive to go back out. If we do not plow that portion of Stratford we then will have to push all the snow on Dorchester into the yard and driveway at the west end. After a sufficient amount of snow, we would have to haul it out which creates a large expense and use of time and equipment which is not necessary if Stratfo~!is left open. There is a fire hydrant on the NE corner of Stratford and Dorchester at this time. If Stratford was closed, a problem would arise with one fire truck hooked to the steamer. The road would be blocked and no other emer- gency vehicle would be able to reach the residences on Stratford." Police Chief - "It is recommended that the City not abandon or vacate Stratford Lane between Manchester and Dorchester. By doing so it would create a dead end at the end of Dorchester, making-it more difficult for police and fire to respond to calls in that particular neighborhood. Furthermore, there are two homes facing Stratford at this location and it would make it more difficult to respond to these residences on public safety matters." Fire Chief - No reply to date, but he has stated that he opposes closing any street. . NSP - No reply to date.--~/-~'~ Minnegasco - No reply to date. Building InsPector - No reply to date. This will be on the March 26th Planning Commission Agenda. '"'~'~e~nard L, Kopp ¢ ' CC: T. W. Gerold A. H. Lindskoog sIGNATuRE OF APP Address Applicant's Interest ~n Property Residents and owners.o.f ]p~opgrty abutting the street to be vacated: Recommended by Utilities: NSP__ Recommended by City: Public Works ;- /4innegasco ; Continental Tel. ; Fire Chief ; En~.lineer ; ESSEX LANE L~E ZZZ. 5 / i /o ¥3 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April. 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-133 SUBJECT: Dove Lane Sewer The Engineer has encountered a Possible problem with providing the sewer service on Dove Lane where the new street is being constructed. There are four lot owners on Dove Lane that currently don't have sewer available to their lots on Dove. They are: Lots 20 and 21, Block 3 Lots 13 and 14, Block 10 Lot 15 Block 10 Lots 16 and 17, Block 10 Lot 22, Block 3, is owned by the City Attached is a copy of the report from the Engineer listing alternatives that can be pursued. This will be listed for discussion on April 24. .... '~e~nard L. Kopp / ~. cc: Lo Swanson COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ?~,.~i? CONSIJLTING ENGINEERS ~ LAND SURVEYORS ~ SITE PLANNERS April 13, 1979 Reply To: 12805 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound 1978 Street Construction Dove Lane Sewer Dear Mr. Kopp: When the sewers were constructed on Dove Lane in the vicinity of Jennings Road, Lots 20 and 21, Block 3 and Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, Block 10, Woodland Point were not served. At the time of the sewer construction this section of Dove Lane did not exist. The attached sketch shows the ownership of the properties in the area and the location of the existing sewers. The sewer to the south of Jennings Road is not deep enough to extend to serve the property. If the sewer to the north is extended Dove Lane would have to be raised up to 1.5 feet to provide even minimum cover for the sewer. The cost of ~his sewer extension is estimated at $10,700. It would serve 3 potential building sites. Another way to serve these properties with sewer would be to extend a line to lots 20 and 21, Block 3 that could be pumped to from the future house, and to provide a short sewer extension to the other 2 parcels. This cost is estimated at $6,700. The street grade would not be raised for the alternative. A 3rd alternative to provide sewer to the properties would be for each property to pump to the sewer on Eagle. Since each potential building site is now under the same ownership as the property fronting on Eagle, easements could be provided for the sewer when the property is split. This alternative would require no sewer construction at this time. Since the parcels on Dove are low and not prime building sites, this alternative would not cost the landowners anything if they chose not to ever divide their property. Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls print-ecl on recycled paper Mr. Leonard K0pp April 13, 1979 Page Two The reason we are bringing this to your attention at this time is that the owner of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3 has not yet given us an easement we require to finish this portion of Dove and has inquired about the availability of sewer. He has said that he prefers a gravity service to the property. If he is served by gravity sewer the other parcels would also be involved in the construction. We would appreciate the Council's guidance on how to proceed on this. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:sh O Vo~l i 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 18, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-135 SUBJECT: Engineering Contract Attached is a copy of a proposed contract with McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. This is the third contract drawn up. The Council's attention is directed to the following items: 1. Page 2 Item 3 - Payment Schedule (A) Federal Grants are charged at a higher rate than local projects. (B) Staking and inspection are charged by the hour at the rate of 2.25 times McCombs-Knutson's total cost which includes insurance, Social Security, etc. as described in Article 5 (Page 10). "Skip" says normal charges now 2.7 times hourly without insurance or 2.25 times hourly including insurance. 2. Page 6 Item 1.5.3 - Covers engineer's responsibilities and items he is not responsible for. 3. Page 8 Item 2.1.8 through 2.1.12 - Covers other items the Engineer can bill for. 4. Page 9 - Item 3.3 states items the City must furnish on property. 5. Page 13 Article 10 - Provides for termination of the contract and for payment of services to the date of termination. It is recommended that the Mayor and Manager be authorized to enter into the agreement. Leonard L. Kopp f' / In ~Y PART A AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER & ENGINEER THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 1979, by and between the City of Mound', Minnesota, the Owner, and McCombs-Knutson Associates, Incorporated, 12805 Olson Memorial Highway, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441, hereinafter called the Engineer. WITNESSETH: That whereas the Owner intends to contract with a Consulting Engineer to fulfill the normal City requirements relating investigations, preliminary studies, design of municipal facilities, observation of work, resident inspection, staking out of work, an'd such miscellaneous surveys as may be necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER for the considerations hereinafter set forth agree as follows: The ENGINEER shall act as City Engineer as directed by the CITY COUNCIL and provide professional services for the CITY in accordance with the Agreement and the Terms and Conditions, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Owner-Engineer Agreement. 2. Meeting Attendance The ENGINEER shall attend meetings as directed by the City Manager or Council. Meetings may include but are not necessarily limited to the following: C. D. E. City Council Meetings Planning Commission'Meetings Public Hearings Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Court Hearings Payment to the ENGINEER for attendance at A, B, and C when not connected with a project will be at the rate of Twenty Five ($~5.00) per meeting. Payment for attendance at other meetings will be at the hourly rate of 2.25 times our Direct Personnel Expenses as defined in Article 5 of Part B. Preliminary Studies, Plans and Specifications, and Contract Administration (large projects). As directed by the City Council, the ENGINEER shall prepare plans and specifications,~ observe construction, provide resident inspection and stake out work on large projects (greater than $50,000 construction cost) with the City. The ENGINEER will be compensated for the preliminarystudies, plans and specifications, construction observation on the basis of the percent (%) of construction cost. The percent will be 8% for projects $50,000 to $200,000 and 6% for all· projects over %200,000. projects over $200,000 of routine complexity includes watermains, sewer systems, etc. For projects of a higher degree of difficulty, such as, treatment plants, street improvements, and those involving Federal grants will be 1.3% higher than the above rates. Projects ~with construction cost above $2,000,000 will be considered individually. Resident inspection and staking will be paid at the hourly rate of 2.25 times our direct personal expenses. Miscellaneous Services The ENGINEER shall conduct and/or prepare as directed by the Manager or City Council the following: A. Investigations and Reports Feasibliity Studies On Small projects (less than $50,000 construction cost) prepare plans and specifications, observe construction, stake out work and provide resident inspection. D. Prepare Assessment Rolls. The ENGINEER will be compensated for the miscellanous services on the basis of an agreed upon lump sum amount when requested by.the Owner at the hourly rate of 2.25 times the Direct Personnel Expenses. Where investigations and reports described above lead to projects which later proceed as described under paragraph 3 (larger projects), payments received for such investigations and reports shall be credited to the total percentage fee on such projects. If only a part of such investigation or report is applicable the credit shall be made pro-rata. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, at is hereby agreed that the Engineer shall furnish services and the Owner shall make payment for same in accordance with the Agreement. IN WITNESS ~IEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CITY OF MOUND, MINNESOTA By: By: By: -3- PART B AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER & ENGINEER TERMS & CONDITIONS ARTICLE I ENGINEER'S SERVICES 1.1 BASIC SERVICES In accordance With reasonable professional standards. 1.1.1 The ENGINEER agrees to perform professional services in connection with the Project as hereinafter stated, including the stipulations and amendments within the Agreement. 1.1.2 .The ENGINEER'S Basic Services consist of the four phases described.~. below. The ENGINEER's Contracted Professional Services from Others, described within the Agreement, are a part of these services. 1.2 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDIES During the Preliminary Engineering, the ENGINEER shall: 1.2.1 Consult with the Onwer to ascertain the OWNER'S requirements for the project. 1.2.2 Advise the OWNER as to the necessity of his providing or obtaining additional services such as described within Article 2, "Additional Service~ of the ENGINEER,: and if concurred with and authorized by the OWNER, shall provide, procure, or assist him in procuring such additional services. 1.2.3 Prepare a preliminary engineering study and report, which will consist of suitable schematic drawings, layouts and/or flow diagrams and reports of studies as necessary for review and written approval by the OWNER. A statement of the ENGINEER'S Opinion of the Construction Cost shall be prepared based upon the preliminary designs developed to this point. 1.2.4 Present the data contained in the report to the Council at public hearings. 1.2.5 Preparation of applications and supporting documents for governmental grants, loans, or advances. 1.3 DESIGN PHASE Upon receipt of the OWNER'S authorization to implement the preliminary engineering Documents and to proceed with the Design Phase, the ENGINEER shall: -4- 1.3.1 Advise the OWNER as to the necessity of his obtaining further additional gervices including the types of services described in Article 2, "Additional Services of the Engineer," and if concurred with and authorized by the OWNER, shall provide, procure, or assist him in procuring such services. 1.3.2 Prepare from the approved Preliminary Studies, the Design Documents consisting of design criteria, Contract forms including proposal forms and notice to bidders, drawings, technical specifications and other documents as needed by the ENGINEER to complete the Construction Contract Documents. ~ '1.3.3 Prepare a statement of the ENGINEER's Opinion of the Construction Cost for the Project based upon designs established to this point. 1.3.4 Secure approval when authorized by the OWNER from any governmental authorities having jurisdiction over design criteria applicable to the Project or authorities and agencies that may participate in the Project. 1.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE Upon receipt of the OWNER'S approval of the Construction Contract Document Phase and authorization to proceed with Bidding or Negotiating phase, the ENGINEER shall: 1.4.1 Assist the OWNER in obtaining bids or negotiating bid proposals, in analyzing bids and proposals, and in awarding the Construction Contract. 1.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE Upon award of the Construction Contract by the OWNER the Construction Phase of this Agreement will commence. The Construction Phase will terminate upon acceptance by the O~NER and written approval of final certificate of payment to the ContractOr by the ENGINEER. During the Construction Phase, the ENGINEER shall assume the following provisions: 1.5.1 The extent of the ENGINEER'S duties and responsibilities and the limitations of the ENGINEER'S authority are as described herein and in th~ General Conditions of the Construction Contract. These shall not be modified without the written consent of both parties. 1.5.2 Advise and consult with the Owner during the Construction Phase and the ENGINEER shall issue the OWNER'S authorized instrucgions to the Contractor. -5- 1.5.3 Make ~eriodic visits to the site of the construction to observe the progress and quality of the construction work and to determine, in general, if the results of the construction work are in accordance with the Drawings and the Specifications. On the basis of his on-site observations as an ENGINEER, he shall endeavor to guard the OWNER against apparent defects and deficiencies in the permanent work constructed by the Contractor but does not guarantee the performance of the Contractor. The ENGINEER shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous' om-site observations to.check the quality or quantity of the construction work. The ENGINEER is not responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, time of performance, programs, or for any safety precautions in connection with the construction work. The ENGINEER is not responsible for the Contractor's failure to execute the work in accordance with the Construction Contract. The Engineer shall be responsible for the completed work, that the completed work is in accordance with the plans and~specifications. 1.5.4 Review the Contractor's request for progressive Payment, advise the OWNER of the ENGINEER's opinion of the extent of work completed in accordance with the terms of the Construction Contract and issue for processing by the OWNER, a certificate of payment in the certified amount. 1.5 Make recommendations to the ~NER on all claims relating to the execution and progress of the construction work. The ENGINEER'S.decisions in matters relating to ENGINEERS'S design shall be final. 1.5.6 Notify the ~4NER of all permanent work which does not conform to the result required in the Construction Contract, prepare a written report describing any apparent non-conforming permanent work and make recommendations to the OWNER for its correction and, at the request of the OWNER, have recommendations implemented by the Contractor. 1.5.7 Review shop drawings, samples, and other s~bmissions of the Contractor only for general conformance to the design concept of the 'project and for compliance with the result required in.the Construction Contract. 1.5.8 Prepare Change Orders for the OWNER'S approval. 1.5.9 Conduct a construction progress review related to the Contractor's date of completion; receive written guarantees and related data assembled by the Contractor; and issue to the OWNER a Certificate of Final.Payment. 1.5.10 Base~ on the marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by the Contractor, the ENGINEER will fur~ish the OWNER a set of reproducible record prints of drawings showing those changes made during the construction contract execution or during the construction progress. -6- ARTICLE 2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER 2.1 GENERAL If authorized by the OWNER, the ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others additional services of the following types which are not covered by Article 1, and which shall be paid for by the OWNER as provided in Article 7, "Payment to the Engineer," Additional services of the ENGINEER and the Engineer's Contracted Professional Services from Others include, but are not limited to the following. · 2.1.1 Services due to major changes in general scope of the Project or changes in its design iqcluding, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity and/or character of construction. ~ 2.1.2 Revising studies, reports, design documents, drawings and/or specifications which have previously been approved by the OWNER. 2.1.3 Preparation of design documents for alternate bids requested by the OWNER for construction work which is not awarded. 'If all bids are. rejected. 2.1.4 Preparation of detailed renderings, exhibits and/or, scale models for the Project. 2.1.5 Providing special analysis of the OWNER'S needs such as operating · analysis, OWNER'S operating and maintenance manuals, OWNER'S special operating drawings and/or charts, and any other similar analysis. · 2.1.6 Providing boundary surveys, "stake out" of the location of the work, and any other special field surveys. 2.1.7 Investigations involving detailed considerations of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; the preparation of rate schedules, earnings and expense statements, appraisals and valuations; detailed quantity surveys of material and labor; and material audits or inventories required for certification of force account construction performed by the ~NER. -7- 2.1.8 Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by work damaged by fire, flood, or other disasters during construction. 2.1.9 Additional services and costs of the ENGINEER other than visits to the Project as required by Article 1, "Engineer's Services." 2.1.10 Basic service includes the determination of the general location and width of right-of-way and easements. Land surveying services and work done to negotiate and obtain easements from the property owners when authorized by the City will be performed as extra services. Basic services will include the service of the project engineer on easements. 2.1.11 Giving testimony as an expert witness for the OWNER in any litigation or other proceedings involving this Project or otherwise assisting the O~NER in connection with litigation or other assessments involving the project. 2.1.12 Any other services not otherwise provided for in this agreement, including without limitation, services normally furnished by the OWNER as described in Article 3, "Owner Responsibilities." 2.2 RESIDENT PROJECT SERVICES , 2.2.1 If requested by the O~NER or recommended by the ENGINEER and approved by the OWNER, one or more full-time Resident Project Inspectors will be furnished and directed by the ENGINEER in order to provide the OWNER with continuous representation at the Project site during the construction phase. Such resident project inspection will be paid for by the OWNER as indicated in - Part A of this agreement. 2.2.2 iIf the ENGINEER is authorized to furnish a Resident Project Inspector then the ENGINEER through such Representative shall in accordance with reasonable standards of the trade, regularly observe the progress of the project and periodically report to the Owner that the construction is in accordance with the plans and specifications. ARTICLE 3 THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES The OWNER will: 3.1 Provide all criteria and full information as to his requirements for the Project, upon request of the ~Engineer. 3.2 Assist the ENGINEER by placing at his disposal all available written data pertinent to the site of the Project including previous reports and any other data affecting the design and/or construction of the Project. -8- 3.3 When available, furnish the ENGINEER the data on property, boundary, right-of-way~ topographic and utility surveys; soils reports, including core borings, probings and subsurface explorations; hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests, inspections of samples, and materials, O~NER reports and other consultant services including reports and consultation, ~ot covered in Article 2, "Additional Services of the Engineer," all of which the ENGINEER will rely on for his preparation of the design and Construction Contract Documents for this Project. When such information is not available and the necessity of having information is agreed to by both parties, the OWNER shall arrange to obtain such data. 3.4 Acquire all land and rights-of-way for the Project. ~en performed by.the ENGINEER, payment shall be in accordance with paragraph 2.1.11. 3.5 Guarantee access to the property and make all provisions for the ENGINEER to enter upon public and private lands as required for the ENGINEER to perform his services under this Agreement. 3.6 Advertise for proposals from bidders, open the sealed proposals at the appointed time and place and pay for all costs incident thereto. 3.7 Provide legal review of the Construction Contract Document. Provide such accounting and insurance counseling services as are required for the Project. 3.8 Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER'S liason with respect to the ENGINEER'S service. 3.9 Furnish or instruct the ENGINEER to provide at the O~NER'S expense, necessary additional services as stipulated in Article 2 of this Agreement, or other services as required. 3.10 Furnish to the ENGINEER, prior to any performance by .the ENGINEER under the Agreement, a copy of any design and construction standards the OWNER shall require the ENGINEER to follow in the preparation of the Construction Contract Documents. ARTICLE 4 REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 4.1 Reimbursable expenses are in addition to the fees for Basic and Additional Services. Reimbursables include actual expendituyes made by the ENGINEER, his employees, or his consultants in the interest of the Project and are the expenses listed in the following sub-paragraphs: 4.1.1 Expense of transportation, subsistence, and lodging when traveling at the Owner's request to any location outside of the metropolitan area in connection with the project or grant approval or other authorized travel. 4.1.2 When authorized in advance by the OWNER, the expense of preparing prospectives Or models for the OWNER'S use; and authorized expenses incurred for performing any services under OWNER'S Responsibility such as listed in Article 3, "Owner's Responsibilities," paragraph 3.3. ARTICLE 5 DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSES 5.1 Direct Personnel Expense is the cost of salaries and mandatory and customary benefits, such as Social Security, Unemployment Compensation, Workmen's Compensation and other statutory benefits, insurance, sick leave, holidays, vacatidns, pension plans and similar and customary benefits for employees of the ENGINEER engaged on the Project, including" architects,.engineers, designers, job captains, draftsmen, specification writers and typists engaged in computation, research and design, production of drawings, specifications and other documents pertaining to the Project, and in rendering services during cpnstruction at the site. ARTICLE 6 CONSTRUCTION COST 6.1 Construction Cost, when used as a basis for determining the ENGINEER'S Fee for all construction work designed or specified by the ENGINEER, includes the costs of labor, materials, equipment, 'and specified furnishings and shall be determined as follows with precedence in the order listed: 6.1.1 For completed construction, the actual total cost to the OWNER of all such construction work. 6.1.2 For construction work not constructed,'the lowest bona fide bid received from a qualified bidder for any or all of such work; or 6.1.3 For work for which bids are not received the ENGINEER'S latest Opinion of the Construction Cost or the hourly rate, whichever is lower. 6.2 Construction Cost does not include the fees of the ENGINEER and consultants, the cost of the land, rights-of-way, or other costs which are the Responsibility of the Ok~ER as provided in Article 3, "The Owner's Responsibilities." -10- 6.3 Labor fhrnished by the OWNER for the Project construction shall be included in the Construction Cost at current market rates. Materials and equipment furnished by the O~ER shall be included at current prices, F.O.B. Project Site, except that used materials and equipment shall be included as if purchased new for the Project. ARTICLE 7 PAYMENTS TO THE ENGINEER 7.1 The OWNER will pay the ENGINEER for the basic services performed under Article 1, "Engineers Services," and in-Part A as indicated within the Agreement, as follows when the percentage of the construction cost applies (on larger project): 7.1.1 A variable lump sum fee which is initially computed on the ENGINEER'S Opinion of the Construcfion Cost as defined in Article 6, "Construction Cost," times an agreed percentage rate amount which is set forth within the AgrEement. During the progress of the service, the ENGINEER'S fee Shall be adjusted by the estimates of Construction Costs prepared during the various phases and finally, at the conclusion of the services, on the actual cost of the Project to the OWNER. 7.2 Payments on account of said fee for basic services provided in Article 7, paragraph 7.1.1 above shall be as follows: 7.2.1 Progress payments shall be made monthly in proportion to services performed except where prior arrangements are made between the Owner and Engineer~ The compensation for basic services shall amount to the following percentage of the total fee at completion of each 'phase of the work:~ (2) (3) Preliminary Report Phase Final Design Phase Construction Phase 20 Percent or lump sum price 70 Percent 10 Percent* 7.2.2 Fees paid on the basis of a hourly rate shall be paid monthly based on the amount of hours spent the previous month except where prior arrangements have been made between the Owner and Engineer. 7.2.3 No deductions shall be made from the ENGINEER'S compensation on account of penalty, liquidated damages, or other sums withheld from payments to contractors. 7.2.4 If the ENGINEER'S services for the Project are suspended by the OWNER for more than three months or the Project is abandoned in whole or in part by the OWNER, the ENGINEER shall be paid his fees earned at that time or receive written notice from the OWNER of such suspension or abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due and all terminal expenses resulting from such suspension or abandonment. * Upon completion and acceptance of the project. -11- 7.3 The OWNER shall pay the ENGINEER for Additional Services of the ENGINEER performed under Article 2, "Additional Services of the Engineer". 7.3.1 The cost of the Additional Services of the ENGINEER shall betas stated in Part A of the Agreement. 7.3.2 Payments on account of Additional Services of the ENGINEER shall be made within 30 days of the ENGINEER'S submittal of his monthly statement covering such expenses 7.4 The OWNER will pay the ENGINEER for the cost of Reimbursable Expense as defined in Article 4, on the basis of the ENGINEER'S cost for service performed by the ENGINEER or as stipulated within the Agreement. 7.4.1 Payments on account of Reimbursable Expenses.provided for in Article 4, "Reimbursable ~xpenses," shall be made within 30 days of the ENGINEER'S submittal of his monthly statement covering such expenses or will be paid as defined in Article 7.3.2. 7.5 The OWNER Will pay the ENGINEER for preparing to serve and serving. as an expert witness at the same rate as direct personnel expenses as previously stated in the Agreement., ARTICLE 8 GENERAL CONSIDERATION 8.1 The ENGINEER shall act as the OWNER'S agent with respect to those phases of the Project to which the Agreement and the Terms and Conditions of thi~ Owner-Engineer Agreement apply. 8.2 The ENGINEER will prepare his Drawings and Specificationp in a timely manner, but it is agreed between the parties to this agreement that the ENGINEER cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond his control, nor by factors which could not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this agreement was prepared and executed. 8,3 The ENGINEER'S opinion of the Construction Cost is the opinion of the ENGINEER of probable Construction Cost and is supplied as a guide only. Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor and material or over competitive bidding and market conditions, the ENGINEER does not guarantee the accuracy of such opinion as compared to contractor bids or actua~ cost to the OWNER. 8.4 The ENGINEER will perform his services in accordance with reasonable current professional standards of the profession for the Minneapolis-St Paul Metropolitan Area and will at all times strive to perform to the highest standards. The ENGINEER shall not be responsible for manner or -12- means of construction or for any safety responsibilities in connection with the contractor's or subcontractor's work. Further, the ENGINEER shall not be responsible for any breach of contract by the contractor, except to the extent of the ENGINEER'Sresponsibilities herein otherwise stated. 8.5 During the performance of services within this Agreement, the scope of the ENGINEER'S Service, Article 1, the Additional Services of the ENGINEER, Article 2, and the Reimbursable Expenses, Article 4, and compensation thereon may be adjusted by mutually agreed, written amend- ments to this Agreement. ARTICLE 9 ENGINEER'S ACCOUNTING RECORDS Records of the ENGINEER'S Direct Personnel Expense, Contracted Professtona~ Services from Others, Reimbursable Expenses pertaining to the Project, and records of accounts between the OWNER and the Contractor, shall be kept on a generally recognized accounting basis and shall be available ~to the OWNER or his authorized reprdsentative, at mutually convenient times on cost-plus contracts only and services under Article 2. ARTICLE 10 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be terminated by either party by seven days' written notice by mutual agreement or in the event of substantial failure to perform in accordance with the terms hereof by the other party through no fault of.the terminating party. If thisagreement is terminated, the ENGINEER shall be paid for the extent of services performed by him to the termination notice date including Reimbursable Expenses then due. ARTICLE 11 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS The drawings and Specifications are the property of the OWNER and shall be turned over to them when final payment is made. ARTICLE ~2 DELEGATION OF DUTIES Neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER shall delegate his duties in this Agreement without the written consent of the other party. ARTICLE 13 EXTENT OF AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the OWNER AND ENGINEER and supersedes all prior negotiations, representa- tions or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the OWNER and the' ENGINEER. ARTICLE 14 APPLICABLE LAW This Agreement will he.governed by the law of the State of Minnesota. -14- 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 12, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-126 ~ SUBJECT: Park Commission Recommendation The following items from the March Park Commission meeting require Council attention: 1. Dock Variance The owner of Lots 37 and 10, Block 11, Seton and Lot 5 in Block 2 have requested to extend his dock across the unplatted Longford Lane from Lot 5 to Lot 37 and 1~. The Park Commission recommended to the Council to Deny the variance request. 2. The Park Commission recommended the City negotiate with the School to: A. Furnish life guarding for the City beach. B. To establish a Youth Employment Program. It'is requested that the Council authorize the negotiations. cc: Mr. S. Mancino Minutes of the MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION · March 8, 1979 Present: Larson., Peterson, Hasek, Shay, Bailey, Case, tynott,' with Ahrens excused, Kopp, Bollis, Rother and Withhart, D. Delaney Secretary. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Larson and the minutes of the meeting of February 8, 1979 were presented for'approval. Lynott made a motion seconded by Shay that the minutes be approved as presented, unanimously approved. City Manager"s Report: Kopp briefly reviewed his resume of the School District meet- ing, elaborati.ng on the cost factor relating to unit basis/hourly rate. Stated that .most of the City's summer hiring is done during the Easter recess and the Commission should decide whether the City or the School District is to have charge of the life guards.' Distributed article from the Sun News regarding dock rates, percentage of in- crease cost for Excelsior. but did remind the Commission that Excelsior does put in and maintain the docks. Larson. informed the Commission .that the "c~mpus" for the Summer Recreational Program is identified with Hilltop School but within 2 to 3 years this will be moved to Three Points Park for t~e Summer. Trails Commission Report: Lynott explained the revised, updated Priority List of the Bike-Hike Trails. This will be distributed to members by next meeting. Larson informed the Commission that Spring Park has but two Bike Trails, County Road 15 and 51 and with high traffic usage on 15 this is practically eliminated with not much being done with County Road 51 either. Mjnnetrista's program is practically non- existant as there is so much open space and development has not gained momentum to have this as a high priority for this City. Park & Tree Coordinator's Report: 'B~llis distributed membership cards to. the Minnesota Recreation & Park Association'.to members. Would work on additional identification signs to mark the trails and make them more conspicious for the public use. Stated our warming house was being utilized but during the very cold weather, little usage, as was expected. The lake rink at Mound Bay Park had beautiful ice, was flooded twice but trouble with snowmobiles crossing rink and gouging ice surface. Heav~. snow- mobile usage at Surfside during weekends makes this rink difficult to maintain. City plowed the marsh on Bartlett and Wilshire, behind the church, and this was used by the neighborhood youngsters. Dock Inspector's Report: Rother had submitted variance applications from two residents Merlin Woytcke of 1701 Bluebird Lane and Gordon Woytcke of 1716 Bluebird Lane, request- ing dock placement to each side of markers to allow an area for swimming. This involves dock permits 13660 and 13690 ~nd would allow a 52 foot area between markers for swim- ming area. Considerable discussion on. whether to consider this area as a neighborhood swimming beach and follow setbacks for establishing a beach area and ultimately elimin- ating dock spaces to accomplish this. Will be considered at the November meeting When ddck permits are reviewed for the coming year. A motion was made by Bailey seconded by Case, "recommend to Council to grant variance but the City will not recognize the use of this area as a City Swimming Beach," unan- nimously approved. ' m Man.cino requested a variance to put a dock over and across Longford Road (platted t not utilized as marshy and mostly under water). He has Lots 37 and 10 of Block 11 d across the road Lot 5 of Block ~ all in Seton. He has a dock now on Lot 5, his property but by extending it to cross Long. ford Road it would be more acgesslble Minutes of Mound Advisory Park Commission Meeting of March 8, 1~7~ contfnued to his prop~'rty on lot 10. Motion made by Hasek and seconded by Larson, "Recommend to Cquncll to DENY variance request to build a dock over Longford Road (cannot block public right-of-way)." Motion unanimously approved to Deny variance. .City Councii Representat.[.v~.Report: Withhart reported that Council will not involve Park Commission in Commercial Dock requests but will render deci'sions themselves. Briefly reviewed past and future training sessions of the M.R.P.A. There will be a workshop in Spring and this would serve as an aid for members to be more productive and constructive, if'they could attend. Requested that Commission'make some decision or recommendation regarding the School District Program in three important ~reas: Life Guards, Ice Rink Supervision and Youth Employment Program. L._lr~q motion was made by Larson seconded by Shay, "Recommend to Council they negotiate with the S~ho01 District to supervise the life guarding of our beaches but retain our own eviously employed Mound Guards.". Unanimously approved. Motion by Hasek seconded by Shay, "Recommend to Council that Mound NOT ENTER into con- tract for roving attendant for the skating rinks for the 79-80 season." Unanimously approved. R!tionby.Larson seconded by Peterson, to Council to on ~egot i'ate e You.th Employment Program with regard to limitation on dollar expenditure'(Minimum ferral Charge)." Unanimously approved. ~oE~. Range Planning Report: Larson questioned the progress of the map !ncorporating the City Wetlands and Park Lands. Boliis informed him that the project is approxim- ately three-quarters finished. Gave b~ief resume of parks on the Island, Island Park, Pebbl. e Beach and long range future plans for Chester Park (next to A1 & Alma's) as a swimming beach with benches, Tyrone Park, have plan laid out similar to scheduled progress of Three Points Park and Island Park, move warming house to other end of park. Wychwood Beach, swimming area with benches and possibility of a neighborhood park across from the Briarwood area. Bollis explained they were behind schedule on demolition of Three Points existing build- ing as the Street Dept. is doing most of the wor~ and the schedule h~s to be flexible to allow for sandwiching in this work with other scheduled City work and maintenance, particularly during the winter snow removal months. Larson suggested a committee be formed for the "Parks are People". Shay was appointed chairman with Lynott, Hasek and Larson as members. Motion by Hasek seconded by Case to adjourn. Unanimously approved. did 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound~ Minnesota April 11, .1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-128 SUBJECT: Gambling Permit Attached is an application for a Gambling Permit from the Minnetonka American Legion Post 398. A resolution from the Council approving the permit is required. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota $15. O0 Sing~e--Permit APPLICATION FOR 'G~4BLING PE~4IT Name of Organization · /~"'~ t3/? ('/'. //~/'//~'~,~ ~-~'~'¢".- .., a ,,~._~/~ ~,,/j~,'-~i.. applies for a · · 'a~nuaf/single occasion Address organization, hereby. gambling permit. Date to be used. /q 7~ Phone Number of Organization ~.72 Date Organization was organized Purpose of Organization ~../7 Type of Gambling to take place: Paddlewheel Yes ~ Tipboard Yes .~ Raffle Yes,~..' Location of Gambling: No No No Name of Building Owner~74/.~./~ff ~/~,.,/,';.~.- //~,~...3-'--~ ..~ ~ . . , IS the building owned or leased by the organization ~.~,z/~ ~. j Date ownership was acquired. Z~ / If leased, expiration date of lease (Copy of lease must accompany application) Gambling Manager: Name of Gambling Manager '~ .~.// '~/~./~ 'f~/~ Home Address ~/~ ~'~./~,,.'~, ~P/;7 ~/.,~p/,;,;~,~.~ome Phone Is Gambling Manager an active member of organization., y ~.%' (Required) Date membership acquired / .~ ~t.~ Is Gambling Manager paid by the organization for handling the gambling. (The answer to this question must be no - Sec. 43:40) (2) Amount of bond furnished by Gambling Manager _/~; Name of Company 'furnishing Bond ~t~-/ ~/~l~/~;'~, ~/' agree to file a copy of the bond-w~h the ~i~ Name of Bank where gambling funds will be kept. Bank Account Number for gambling funds 9/ 9~ (At least '$10,000. ) and we Are funds in the above account mixed with other funds.,..~ .(Answer must be "No") AGREEMENT ThJ~iF~ ~'~ ¢~ here~y agrees that if the'license herein is Name o~ Applicant _ ~hat .Xlw 4. granted the /~.~q~, will save the'City, its officers and Name of Applicant agents harmless against any claims or actions and the cost of defending any c.laims or actions arising out of or.by reason of the granting of the license or the conduct of any of the activities authorized by the license. It is further agreed that monthly reports shall be furnished the City by the Gambling Manager as directed in the ordinance and the _. . %-~ ~~ Name of Applicant hereby authorizes the Bank named above as the keeper 'of gambling funds to allow the City access to the figures and activity of account numbe ~ listed above. Signed by authorized Officer of Organization The above application is made on behalf of th . and all information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and Date L/ Signature ' ' - - ~itle · Annual Licenses: Expire on January 31 of each year. Fees are not prorated for licenses purchased after February 1. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota 4-24-79 April 9, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-127 SUBJECT: Approval of Dock Permits for the 1979 Season Attached is a copy of the list of Dock Permits received from the Dock Inspector for your approval. /o/? ON LAK~ MINNE'rONKA 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 5§364 INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDS TELEPHONE (612) 472-1155 April ~, 1979 TO: Leonard Kopp FROM: Dock Inspector SUBJECT: Dock Permits; approval. I recommend the followin9 applications for dock permits be approved~ providin9 their docks conform to our ordinance when I inspect them. Respectfully, Don Rother Dock Inspector 352 dock sites assigned, 5 are shared dock sites. $10~1h3.50 in monies for assigned dock sites. Da/ich · ._ CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MIi~'~OTA DOCK 00?70 23710 41902 42277 41952 30230 O228O 42961 00670 00940 10640 22510 60945 61010 lO~5O 61150 10074 O1120 23110 02380 22390 10490 DOCK PERMITS 1979 ALPHABETICAL LISTING NAME ADDRESS ABT Abbott, Robert; 1575 Bluebird Ln. yes Abr~s, Taft; 2163 Fairview Ln. yes Ahrens, Frank A. II, 4673 Island View Dr. yes Alexander, Carl; 4725 Islsnd Vi ewDr. yes Ambrose, Richard; 4704 Island View Dr. no Anderson, David; 2541Lakewood Ln. no Anderson, David; 1571 Finch Ln. yes Anderson, James; 3225 Devon Ln. no Anderson, Robert; 1601 Bluebird Ln. yes Applegren, Larry; 1579 Bluebird Ln. no Archer, Richard; 1737 Wildhurst Ln. yes Aspholm, N. W.; 2162 Cardinal Ln. no Auger, Charles; 3117 Highland Blvd. no Ax[, P,ul; 6o46 Ridgewood Rd. no Babler, David; 1785 Wildhurst Ln. yes B~ert, Harry; 2977 Oakl~wn Ln. no B, gaus, David; 4732 Beachside Rd. no Bailey, Richard; 1554 Bluevird Ln. no Bame, William; 5054 Bartlett Blvd. no Benjaminson, Melvin; 5019 Enchanted Rd. no Bennett, Robert; 2933 Dickens Ln. no Beranek, D~vid; 5971Hawbhorne Rd. no FEE PAID 61,00 25,00 25.00 43, O0 25.00 25. oo 43.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25. oo 25. oo 34. O0 25.00 27.00 61 .oo 25.00 25. oo 25.00 27. O0 DOCK TYPE L S S L S S L S S S S S S S S S S L S S S S PHONE 472-2992 472-5015 472-1520 472-1011 472 -4640 472-2931 472-5378 472 -5626 472-4517 472 -5268 472-3937 472-6463 472-2363 472-6114 472-2708 472-1402 472 -6075 472-4011 472-6568 472-1123 472-3667 472-6528 22 SUB TOTAL 8-y'es Ih-no 671.00 18-S 13480 02480 31390 1255o 20790 42901 60825 5o655 30670 10460 3157o 6o885 ~o28o lo58o 42oo2 3o17o ooo9o 2236o 30410 51195 60965 oo85o 5o355 20810 43050 Berg, Ray; 1721 Bluebird Ln. · Berg, Suzann¢; 1674 Dull Ln. Ber§quist, Ronald; 2540 Wexford Ln. eBialon, John; 1729 Gull Ln. Bielke, Hilland; 2143 O~erland LnG Bighsm, James; 4746 Island Vi e~Dr. Bill, W. John; 3135 Priesh Ln. Bischke, Herberh; 3001 Brighton Blvd. Bjorgum, Gary; 4820 Longford Rd. Blanchard, S. J.; 1749 Wildhurst Ln. Block, Celvin; 5062 Bayport Rd. Bode, Lloyd; 5947 Ridgewood Rd. Boehner, Melvin; 2050 W~terside Ln. Boettcher, Roland; 1780 Hillside Ln. Bohnboff, Steven; 4687 Island View Dr. Bonnema, Robert; 5079 Bartlett Blvd. Bosma, Melvin; 1689 Avocet Ln. Botko, Will; 2149 Cardinal Ln. Brandenburg, Donald; 2567 Emerald Dr. Breitner, John; 2911Cambrid§e Ln. Bri99s, Stephen; 3111 Highland Blvd. Bristol, Gene; 1586 Bluebird Ln. Brynsteson, Gary; 3045 Brighton Blvd. Buckner, Charles; 2142 Overland Ln. Bute, Norman; 4848 Tuxedo Blvd. 25 SUB TOTAL no no yes no no no yes yes yes no no yes no yes no no yes no yes no no no no no 8-yes 17-no ~.oo 97.00 2~.oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 27.00 25.00 27.00 25.00 61.oo 25.oo 25.oo 25.o0 25.00 25.oo 2f. oo 2~.oo 724.50 DOCK S S S S S S ~S S S S S S S S S U S S S S S S S 2-U 23-S 545-5000 472 -5474 - 472-6284 472-3190 472 -3467 472-2417 472 -2649 472-1706 472-5340 472-6575 472-2960 472 -1463 472-1566 472-3863 472-6432 472-417o 472 -1358 472-3553 472-2531 471-8149 472-1o16 472-5133 472-5656 472 -5702 472-1925 /o/y' 316OO 42990 5o385 44097 51555 32970 5185o 43882 50775 43350 51135 02320 1351o 20730 30010 02605 31680 41830 32250 32820 31830 31450 10670 43450 NAMB ADDRESS Byrnes, Robert; 2851 Cambridge Ln. Burton, W. Po; 4608 Csrlow Rd. C,ble, Gary; 4921 Drummond Rd. C,lhoun, Inez; 3034 Bri§hton Blvd. Caoron, Charles; 4937 Island View Dr. Carlson, Bernice; 2867 Cambridge Ln. Carlson, David; 4722 Gordon Rd. Carlson, Robert; 4991 Brighton Blvd. Casserly, Shawn; 4921 Island View Dr. Chapman, Bette; 4994 Manchester Rd. Ch~mberlin, Don.{ 4841 Island View Dr. Claire, David; 2921 Cambridge Clark, Lester; 1586 Finch Ln. Cliff, Dan; 1704 Bluebird Ln. Coleman, Douglas; 2100 Noble Ln. Collin§s, Bruce; 4986 Bartlett Blvd. Commerford, Robert; 1600 Heron Ln. Connell, G~ry; 2645 Shannon Ln. Cook, Daniel; 4665 Island View Dr. Coppin, Lawrence; 2720 Shannon Ln. Cosby, Bradley; 4580 DGnbigh Rd. Coyour, Edwin; 4681Wilshire Blvd. Curtis, 3chh N.; 4619 Kildare Rd. Daly, 3chh; 1748 Sumach Ln. Dampier, William; 4853 Island View Dr. 25 SUB TOTAL yes yes no no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no ~1o rio no yes no yes yes no yes yes yes 9-no 16-yes FEE 25.0o 79. OO ~5.oo 12.5o 25. co 25.00 25.00 25.00 7o. co 27.00 25.00 25.oo 25.00 25.00 27.O0 25.00 ~5.oo 25.00 25.00 25. oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 65.oo 755.5o DOCK TYP~ S L S $ $ S S S T S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S BH 22-S 1-L 1-T 1 -BH 472-1615 472 -2915 472-5363 4?2-4692 472-5864 472-3865 472-5485 472-4986 472-6745 472-1773 472-2?05 472-4493 472-2094 472-3590 472-1760 472-5951 472-6198 472-6677 944-2222' 472-2316 472-1317 472 -6925 472-135o 472-4033' 472-5965 /o DOCK oo49o ho995 6113o 4~o2o 01030 60905 42871 13300 31110 oo7oo 32340 1375o 02500 02080 23355 2022O 3o15o 13~7o 43080 43575 2315o 60925 5o8o5 22224 3148o NAME ADDRESS DePaulis, Dennis; 1601 Dove Ln. Dexter, David; 4440 Radnor Dolan, Gordon; 6064 Ridgewood Rd. Dorris, Joan; 4535 Aberdeen Rd. Doylr, James; 1567 Bluebird Ln. Dray, Frank; 6228 Westwood Circle Drucker, Richard; 3161 Argyle Ln. Dybing, Robert; 1737 Canary Ln. Dzik, John; 2530 Black Lake Ln. Eccles, John; 5112 Woodland Rd. Edwards, Richard; 473o Wilshir¢ Blvd, Edwardson, Jeffrey; 1701 Avocet Ln. Eisert, Merle; 4920 Crestv~ew Rd. Eiss, Helen; 1563 Eagle Ln. Elias, Burton;'49?2 Northern Rd. Engle, Marvin; 5429 Breezy Rd. Erickson, Aldys; 5038 Bartlett Blvd. Erickson, Mitchell; 1713 Canary Ln. Eskedahl, Kenneth; 4815 Island View Dr. Ess, Tom; 1309 W. llth Ave, Shakopee Fairbanks, Dennis; 5056 Woodridge Farley, James; 596? Ridgewood Rd. Farmer, Douglas; 2971 Cambridge Ln. Farness, John; 2200 Centerview Ln. Farquharson, James; 4631 Paisley Rd. 25 SUB TOTAL ABT no no no no yes no no yes yes no no no no no no no no no yes yes no yes no no 6-yes 19-no FEE PAID 25,00 25.00 25.00 25,00 43.oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25. oo 25. oo 25,00 25,00 25,00 25.00 2¢. O0 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 12.5o 25. oo 12.5o 25,00 6:8.00 DOCK TYPE PHONE S 472-6095 S 472-1518 S 472-2129 S 472-5426 L 472-4825 S 472-5978 S 472-6427 S 472-3023 S 472-5064 S 472-3267 S 472-4562 S 472.-4715 S 472-2182 S 472-3268 S 472-4103 S 1,72-5251 S 472-1039 S 472-5222 S 472'3767 S ~45-4208 S 472-5952 S 472-1635 S 472-1560 S 472-1494 S 472-3412 24-S 1-L 20160 42314 61o5o 2O19O 4352o 33510 0192O 31510 13060 o24~o 2o55o' 61o3o o246o 1264o P2990 O~720 43772 30110 20400 41690 32010 31740 3189O 30260 43727 NAME ADDRESS FiebelRorn, John; 5910 Glenwood Rd. Finn, Joyce; 47?9 Island View Dr. Fleming, Dean; 3111 Priest Lane Follett, Craig; 5441 Breezy Rd. Forsman, Vincent; 4857 Island View Dr. Fournier, Cyril; h466 Denbeigh Rd. Frahn, Leonard; 1555 Dove Ln. Franzen, Norm; 5070 Glendale Rd. Friedrichr, Arthur; 1709 Dove Ln. Froslan, Lowell; 1590 Finch Ln. Gallagher, Irva; 3000 Devon Ln. Gardner, George; 6056 Ridgewood Rd. Gardner, John; 1583 Gull Ln. Gardner, Michael; 503P Three Points Blvd. Geffre, Dennis; 2193 F~irview Ln. 6effre, Donald; 5016 Crestview Rd. Gehlen, Hillard; 4909 Island View Dr. Oehrke, Ervin; 2316 Fernside gn. Oimmestad, Melvin; 5514 Spruce Rd. 6olembeski, Lana; 4686 Island View Dr. Golz, Alan; 2930 Dickens Ln. Good, Owen; 2700 Tyrone Ln. Goodwin, James; 2648 Shannon Ln. Gore, Robert; 5789 Elm Rd. Gracza, R,; 48?7 Island View Dr. 25 SUB TOTAL ABT yes no no yes yes yes rio no no yes no no yes no no no no no yes no yes 8-yes l?-no FEE PAID 25.oo 74,5o 25. GO 25.oo 43.00 12.5o 25.00 25.oo 27.oo 25.o0 25.oo 25.oo 25.00 25. oo 25. oo 25. GO 25.oo 25.oo 25.oo 25.o0 27.OO 25.OO 25.00 25.O0 65. O0 724.oo DOCK TYPE S L S S L S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S BH 22-S 2-L 1 -BH PHONE 472-5894 472-1506 472 -3407 472-3275 472-5919 472-2517 472-3264 472-4303 472-3487 474-7946 472-4685 472-5377 472-5107 472 -6398 472-2851 472-2556 472-6734 472-2428 472-1322 472-3036 472-6605 472-3300 l 472-3796 472-2087 472-3175 ~OCK # 31860 31270 30210 61150 02810 50595 61090 50260 31800 42042 04o10 32070' 50895 30170-2 32670 20610 30250 01680 3124o 30230 41437 41880 20860 60985 32310 25 SUB TOTAL NAME ADDRESS Grande, Michael; 4759 ealway Rd. Grazzini, Eugene; 2552 Kildare Rd. Green, Ernest; 5030 Bayport Rd. Grover, Raymond; Box 81 Groves, RoberL; 4936 Three Point Blvd. Hmgen, Wsll~ce; 3005 Brighton Blvd. Hall, Richsrd; 3040 Dickens Ln. Hartman, Reuben; 5124 Winsor Dr. Hartman, Richard; 2640 Shannon Ln. Van Hauer, Jan; 4708 Island View Dr. Hawley, J. W.; 1701 Shorewood Ln. HedLke, Larry; 2651 Shannon Ln. Head, Daniel; 295? Cambrid§e Ln. Heinsch, Martin; 4978 Bartle%t Blvd. Henke, GerhardL; 4594 Denbigh Rd. Hilgers, Alfred; 2129 Belmont Ln. Hill, James; 5045 Bartlett Blvd. Hillier, W. H.; 1551 Canary Ln. Hiner, Rober%; 2547 Bl~ck Lake Ln. Hober§, Jeffrey; 5001Woodrid9e Dr. Hoese, D~vid; 4629 Hanover Rd. Hoffmann, Kenneth; 4613 Hanover Rd. Homutb, Werner;'2144 Southview Ln. Hoste%ler, Gene; 2982 Westedge Blvd. Howe, Charles; 4730 Cavan Rd. ABT yes no no no yes no no yes no no no yes no yes no no no no no no no 7-yes 18-no FEE DOCK PAID TYPE 25.00 s 25. oo s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 12.5o s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 12.5o s 12.5o s 25. oo s 12.5o s 25, oo s 25.00 s 43.oo T 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s 25.00 s · 593.00 24-S 1-T PHONE 472 -5663 881-6776 472 -2148 472-2874 472-2445 472-1278 472-4879 546-6943 472 -4856 · 472-6612 472-2239 938-0268 472 -3383 472-1846 472 -3423 472-4055 472 -5046 472-3335 472-3619 472-5903 472 -3920 472-2559 472-5195 472 -5063 472-2815 DOCK o194o 50220 ~o88~ 22247 02300 41477 O0155 60785 5o475 23130 20750 02340 2067O 4~077 32190 43380 60725 42511 01880 10610 2089O 30090 OO82O 42406 2227O NAME ADDRESS Howell, Wm.; 6824 27%h Ave. N. Crystal Illies, Rick; 4927 Hanover Rd. In§stad, Edward; 4878 P13~outh Rd. Iverson,. Edward; 2184 Ashland Ln. Jacks, Crai§; 1575 Ea§le Ln. Janicke, Marvin; 4645 Island View Dr. Jansen, Danny; 1673 Canary Ln. 3ohns, Paul; 6048 Beachwood Rd. 3ohnson, Charles; 3021Bri§hton Blvdo Johnson, Gary; 2943 Oaklawn Johnson, Lon; 2190 Cedar Ln. Johnson, Richard; 1575 Finch Ln. Johnson, Robert; 5488 Tonkawood Rd. Jorve, David; 4701 Island View Dr. Kamrath, Le Roy; 2721 Clare Ln. Keintz, Natalie; 4937 Drummond Rd. Kello§§, Fred; 5925 Rid§ewood Rd. Kelby, Esther; 4753 Island View Dr. Kelly, Robert; 1579 Canary Lno Kelly, Wm. J; 1725 Wildhurst Ln. Kern, Michael; 2207 Centerview Ln. Karcher, Viola; .4948 Bartlett Blvd. Kilby, Robert; 1587 Bluebird Ln. Kincaid, Ben; 4753 Island View Dr. Kirsch, Sandra; 2137 Ashland 25 SUB TOTAL ABT no no no no no no no no no no no no no yes no yes no no yes yes yes 9-yes 16-no 25,00 2~.oo 25.00 27.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 27.00 65. OO 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 43.00 25.00 25.00 12.50 34.00 45.00 25.00 703.50 S S S S S S S S S S S S BH S S S S S L S S S L S S 22-S 2-L 1-BH PHONE 544-4.741 472-6397 472-X561 472-2333 472-6573 472-1318 472-3004 472-4584 941-4879 472 -5075 472-5442 472 -3762 472-2015 472-6447 472-6886 472-2996 472-213o 472-1547 571-1331 472 -39Ol 472-6958 472-2491 472-2983 472-3062 472-4356 /oo~] DOCK # 51795 50415 43120 32130 61110 20490 30O3O 02360 23275 50625 OO88O 12790 02870 41272 42990 13360 43020 60765 2092O 00010 10310 61O7O 43647 42351 31540 NAME ADDRESS Koepke, Barry; 2845 Cambridge Ln. Kolar~, Robert; 3223 Gladstone Ln. Kucera, Correll; 4817 Island View Dr. Kuntzm~n, Ron; 3341Tttwedo Blvd. L~Gow, DeWayne; 6039 Cherrywood Rd. Landon, Larry; 5085 Bartlett Blvd. Lan§c, Erwin; 4876 Bartlett Blvd. Langley, Gerald; 4957 Crestview Rd. Lee, Arthur; 2192 Chateau Ln. Leu, John; 3107 Argyle Ln. Lien, Robert; 1583 Bluebird Ln. Lind, Elmer; 16410~ll Ln. Longstrom, Adolph; 1723 Shorewood Ln. Ludden, Frederick; 4617 Island View Dr. Luff, James; 4761 Island View Dr. Lund, Kenneth; 1700 Shorewood Ln. Lundeen, Richard; 4805 Isl,nd View Dr. M~ck, Dale; 3024 Hi§hview Ln. Mall~k, David; 5511 Spruce Rd. Maloney, John; 1500 Park Ave. Maloney, Richard; 1779 Wildhurst Ln. Maltz, Maynard; 6037 Hawthorne Rd. Manchester, Susan; 4873 Island View Dr. Marquardt, Gary; 4737 Island Vi~Dr. Marrone, Gilbert; 4006 Carlow Rd. 25 SUB TOTAL ABT yes no yes no no no no no FAO no no no no yes no no no no rio yes rio yes yes yes 8-yes 17-no PAID 25.00 25,00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 12,5o 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 12.5o 25.00 70.00 25.00 25.00 110.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 72.00 93.60 845.,,~ DOCE TYPE S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S U&BH S S S S S S BH BH 21-S 3-BH 1-L PHONE 472-1987 472-3349 472-1473 472-5408 472-1466 472-3418 472-1854 472-4014 472-6813 472-1945 472-4o95 472 -3209 472-6041 472-3248 472-4149 472-5136 472'513o 472-4196 472-3797 336-4486 472-1997 472-4583 472-5945 472-1529 DOCK 30270 70250 3O39O 00030 20640 42626 32100 01980 01900 224~o 60805 00790 31770 13600 50565 47791 02520 20430 22180 41050 32160 13810 23070 10700 43265 NAME Marsh, Vernon; Mason, Stanley: Matachek, Frank; McCallum, John; ADDPJLSS 5040 Glendale Rd. 5447 Breezy Rd. 2530 Ruby Ln. 1688 Avocet Ln. Mc Celland, Robert; 2117 Fern Ln. McCombs, Ronald; 4767 Island View Dr. McCullough, Daniel; 3037 Brighton Blvd. McLeod, Stanley; 1558 Dove Ln. Meehan, Ed; 1550 Canary~Ln. Meisenheimer, Patrick; 2175 Cedar Ln. Merriam, William; 3083 Highland Blvd. Messerich, Ronald; 1593 Bluebird Ln. Meyer, Richard; 4731Carlow Rd. Michael, Geoff; 1713 Avocet Ln. Miller, George; 3018 Brighton Blvd. Miller, James; 4781 Island View Dr. Mills, Michael; 1585 Gull L~ne Mittelstaedt, Jamie; 5975 Beachwood Rd. Morrison, Lawrence; 2138 Centerview Ln. MunSon, Don; 4717 Island View Dr. Murray, Michael; 2712 Shannon Ln. Neddermeyer, Gilbert; 1749 Avocet Ln. Nelson, Daryl; 2177 Apple Ln. Nelson, Delores; 1731Wildhurst Ln. Nelson, Dou§las; 4828 Island View Dr. 25 SUB TOTAL ABT no no no no no yes no yes no no yes no no no yes no no no no yes yes no yes 7-yes 18-no 27. O0 ~5.oo 25.00 27.00 61.00 25.00 12.5o 25;'00 25.00 25.00 29.50 25.00 25.00 25.00 74.50 27.0O 25.00 25.00 25. oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 696. OO TYPE S S S S S L S S S S S L S S S L S S S S S S S S S 22-,S 3-L PHONE 472-2847 472-5087 472-1531 472-1999 472-2144 472-6407 472 -3969 866-1064 472-5791 472-6515 47~-3884 472-4863 472-3716 472-4216 472-1452 472 -6066 472-596o 472-2841 472-5645 472-2498 472-4296 472-2987 472-3083 D~CK # o244o 31980 20310 20770 32760 44408 33060 43410 30370 13180 32220 50240 40945 40915 20520 02100 50955, 31710 lo220 23090 0212o 02750 22330 02220 01960 NAME ADDRESS Nelson, Jeff; 5043 Enchanted Rd. Nelson, Kenneth; 2620 Tyrone Ln. Nelson, William; 2058 Commerce Blvd. Niccum, Cyril; 2172 Noble Ln. Norring, Daryl; ~590 Denbi§h Rd. Norstrem, Ron~ld; 4957 Islsnd View Dr. O'Bri~n, N~ncy: 4568 Denbi§h Rd. O'Keefe, D~vid; 4849 Island View Dr. Olsen, John; 2549 Emerald Dr. Olson, Carl; 1732 Canary Lno Olson, Craig; 3246 Warner Ln. Olson, Larry; 3232 Warner Ln. Olson, Bruce; 4539 Island View Dr. Oman, Larry; 4856 Hanover Rd. Parent, Robert; 5580 Tonkawood Pasko, Stanley; 1578 Eagle Ln. Pavlo, Lewis; 2945 Cambrid§e Ln. Payne, Richard; 4739 Kildare Ln. Pearson, Gerald; 1770 Wildhurst Ln. peck, Herbert; 2181F~irview Ln. Pedersen, Donald; Petersen, Eugenic; Peterson, Le Roy; 1586 Dove Ln. 1642 Heron Ln. 2197 Cardinal Ln. Peterson, Marjorie; 1566 Eagle Ln. Peterson, Mary; 1574 Dove Ln. 25 SUB TOTAL ABT no no no no yes yes yes yes no no no no yes no no no yes no no no no no yes no 8-yes 17-no FEE PAID 25.00 25.oo 25.00 27°OO 25.00 25.00 65. O0 ~5. oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 12.50 25.00 25.00 12.5o 25.00 59.oo 25.00 25.00 43.00 694. OO DOCK TYPE S S S S S S BH S S S S S S S S S S S S S S T S S S 23-S 1-T 1 -BH PHONE 472-11o7 472-4622 472-2278 472-1470 472-6876 472-1277 472 -5446 472 -5761 472-1911 427-6521 472-2629 472 -5920 472-1160 472-6535 472-i692 472-5017 472-4765 472-4943 472-3328 472-9502 472-1032 472-4682 472-55o5 472-1117 472-3490 DOCK # ?0370 2373o 30350 222.O2 42227 02000 43335 43840 41650 51015 3133o ' 50445 12850 1797o 50835 2248o 5o565 42761 20580 13210 42586 01090 47691 13780 33090 25 SUB TOTAL NAME ADDRESS Peterson, Richard; 5429 Spruce Rd. Peterson, Sterling; 5080 Shoreline Blvd. Pcterson, William; 5115 Bartlett Blvd. Piepkorn, Loren; 2160 Ashland Ln. Pierce, Mildred; 4717 Island View Dr. Pollcy, Roger; 1559 Eagle Ln. Pratley, William; 3038 Dundee Ln. Prince, Florence; 4917 Island View Dr. Prokasky, Thomas; 4649 Island View Dr. Prouty, Phillip; 2933 Cambridge Ln. Pruyn, Michael; 4618 Kildare Ln. Quiet, Larry; 3025 Brighton Blvd. Rager, Roger; 1649 Gull Ln.~ Rapacz, Edward; 1720 Dove Ln. Reese, Conway; 4958 Leslie Rd. Reich, Larry; 2146 Candinal Ln. Reinitz, H. J0el; 3162 Alexander Ln. Rennie, Art; 4751 Aberdeen Rd. Rheinhart, Ron; 5448 Spruce Rd. Richardson, Mark; 1724 Canary Rd. Riches, George; 4763 ~sland View Dr. Richter, Raymond; 1563 Bluebird Ln. Rinderknecht, Ronald; 4771 Island View Dr. Roberge, James Jr.; 1720 Avocet Ln. Robinson, Rodney; 4552 Denbigh Rd. ABT yes no rio no yes yes no yes yes yes - no yes no yes no yes no no yes yes yes no yes 13-ye s 12-no PAID 25.00 25.00 12.5o 25.00 88. oo 56.50 25.0o 43.00 38.50 25. oo 25. oo 12.5o 25.00 79.00 25.00 74.50 25. oo 12.5o 25.oo 25.00 25.00 43.00 43.00 25.00 25.00 853.oo DOCK TYPE S' S S S L S S L S S S S L S U S S S S S L T S S 18-S 5-L 1-T 1-U PHONE 472-2215 472-2209 472-1912 472-1652 472-1722 472-1332 472 -1976 472-6627 472-4618 .. 472-3677 472-2781 472-3107 472-3411 472- 472-1475 472-1738 472-1926 472-1655 472-4446 472-6870 472-6906 472-3331 472-6834 472-5635 473-9490 /00.5 DOCK # 2o34o 1258o 33030 1o34o 41319 30590 226oo o24oo 00760 02140 13000 3o19o 303oo 00215 02690 20830 lo4oo oo145 .42931 20460 lo28o 12490 12730 433o5 13570 NAME ADDRESS Rodgers, 3chh; 2060 Waterside Ln. Rosengren, Scott; 1724 Finch tn. Ross, Sylvia; 3018 Churchill tn. Ruble, Terral; 4971 Three Points Blvd. S~cks, Lewis; 4625 Island View Dr. Sambor, Connie; Box 242 Spring-Park Sawatzke, L. P.; 5240 Pike Rd. Schaible, Mary; 1~76 Finch Ln. Schechter, Herbert; 1599 Bluebird Ln. Schrupp, Gilbert; 1661 Gull Ln. Schrupp, Herman; 1652 Eagle Ln. Schulte, Jam~s; 5038 Bayport Rd. Seagard, John; 2531'Lakewood Ln. Selman, Mark; 1637 Eagle Ln. Seltz, Bonny; 4964 Paradise tn. Senneka, Herman; 5860 Lynwood Blvd. Shaleen, Gary; 1833 Shorewood Ln. Sh~nley, Robert; 1676 Canary Ln. Shatney, Clayton; 4801 Island View Dr. Shay, Roger; 5445 Spruce Rd. Shearer, Michael; 1741Resthaven Ln. Shellenbarger, ~arl; 1733 Gull Ln. Simons, Gordon; 1705 Finch Ln. Skinnes, Ray; 4848 Island View Dr. Sloan, Francis; 1749 Bluebird Ln, 25 SUB TOTAL ABT yes yes no rio yes yes yes yes yes no FAO no no yes no no no yes FAO no yes no yes ll-yes 14 -no 38.5o 25.oo 25.00 25.00 25. oo 27.00 25.00 12.5o 34.00 2~.oo 25.00 25.oo 25. co 25.00 12.5o 25.00 25.00 25. co 25.00 25.0o 25.00 14.50 25.00 25.oo 25. co 614.00 DOCK TYPE L S S S S S S S L S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 23-S 2-L PHONE 472-1699 472-2954 472-3659 472-4496 472-6037 472-1777 472-3542 472-1195 927-9911 472-4378 472-3657 472-2628 472 -2552 472 -6480 938-9011 472-61o4 472-3360 472-4688 472-4468 472-6559 472-1o72 472-6753 472-5980 472-4780 DOCK # 42117 13240 60865 43942 20700 44002 51675 23170 22450 12820 17610 12760 43235 10o50 oo58o O278O 01560 22570 23325 00610 50685 o153o 50925 13630 13330 25 SUB TOTAL NAME ADDRESS SmitH, Gene; 4705 Zsland View Dr. Smith, John; 1709 Canary Ln. Smith, Robert; 3125 Highland Blvd. Snyder, George; 4925 Island Vfew Dr. Sohns, Melvin; 2155 Noble Ln. Sprague, Nell; 4931 Island View Dr. Sollie, Allen; 2855 Cambridge Ln. Sproule, Dale; 2185 Fairview Ln. Stefanoc, Frsnk~ 2160 Cedar Ln. Steffen, Edna; 1716 Eagle Ln. St. 3ohn, M~rjorie; 1728 Finch Ln. Stephenson, Thos.; I717 Finch Ln. Stettin, Ed; 4833 Island View Dr. Stibal, Joe; 4723 Beachside Rd. Storlien, Wayne; 1595 Dove Ln. Stron9, Ernest; 4934 Crestview Rd. Stuth, David; 1543 Bluebird Lno Stutsman, Marjorie; 2173 Cardinal Ln Swanson, Doug; 2142 Sandy Ln. Swensen, Gordon; 1605 Bluebird Ln. Swenson, Gordon; 4844 Manchester Rd. Swenson, Lowell; 1545 Bluebird Ln. Sycks, Gregory; 4983 Leslie Rd. Terlinden, DuW~yne; 1744 Avocet Lno Then, Robert; 1735 Canary Ln. yes riO yes no yes yes rio rio yes yes yes yes no no yes riO rio yes rio yes no rio ll-yes lb-no FEE PAID 25.00 12.5o 82.50 27.OO 79.OO 25.oo 12.5o 25.oo 25.oo 12.5o 25.oo 25.oo 74.5o 25.oo 25.oo 25.oo 25.oo 25.oo 27.00 25.oo 25.oo 25.oo 25.oo 27.00 25.oo 754.5o DOCK TYPE S S BH S U S S S S S S S U S S S S S S S S S S S S 22-S 2-U 1 -BH PHONE 472 -6830 472-3536 472-3039 472-2069 472-1523 '472-6900 472-4156 472-2508 472-59~6 --472-2260 472-4481 472-1377 472-1643 472-6197 472-3420 472-1667 472-5609 472-5155 472-2592 472-3933 472-1758 472-2419 472-3016 472-5880 DOCK ~ 428~1 31950 2013O 60845. 31920 23050 30330 5o745-1 41227 50505 2319o 1055o 42167 O218O 12940 137~0 3~o4o 3O07O 30710 4o855 31360 10010 6O745 40965 5o535 NAME ADDRESS Thomas, Gerald; 4815 Canterbury Rd. Thomas, Robert; 4513 Montgomery Rd. Thompson, 3effrey; 5516 Tonkawood Rd. Thorescn, John; 5845 Fairfield Rd. Tborson, William; 2654 Shannon Ln. Tombers, John; 2151 Apple Ln. ~ Topper, Shirley; 2539 Emerald Dr. Trett¢l, Clement; 4959 Leslie Hd. Touba, Ali R.; 4609 Island View Dr. Vance, La~rrence; 3017 Brighton Blvd. Yah Eps, Harry; 2300 Fairview Ln. Vit, William; 1724 Sumach Ln. Vraspir, James; 4711 Island View Dr. Walentiny, Stephen; 1610 Finch Lno Wallis, Leo; 1668 C~nary Ln. Ward, Donna; 1737 Avocet Ln. Warn¢, Eugene; 2700 Shannon Lno Warnke, Marry; 4994 BartleLt Blvd. W~rtm~n, Don; 4816 Longford Rd. Watson, L. Craig; 4610 Tuxedo Blvd. Weber, Beverly; 6313 Warren Ave., Edina Webster, Julius; 2066 Shorewood Ln. Westergaard, Roy; 5914 Fair£ield Hd. Westgard, Evelyn; 4547 Island Vie~ Dr. Whitman, Charles; 3013 Bri§hton Blvd. 25 SUB TOT~J~ ABT no no no no yes yes no no yes yes no no yes no no no yes no yes no yes no no yes yes lO-yes 15-no P~ID 25.oo ~.5.oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 12.5o 70.O0 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25. oo 52. oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 12.5o 25,00 672.OO TYPE S S S S S S S S L S S S S S S S L S S S S S S S S 23-S 2-L PHONE 472-3998 472-6033 472-1245 472-6883 472-2715 472-1297 472 -4829 472-3285 472-3567 472 -4084 472-1453 472-5841 472-1307 472-1052 472-1030 472-6118 472-4710 472-2048 472-4951 941-6299 472-4137 472-5453 472-2459 471-8811 DOCK 12700 32280 3013o 1o52o 2254o 13690 13660 30310 4o88~ Wiebusch, Mary; Wiese, Robert; ADDRESS 1748 Heron Ln. 2137 Grandview Blvd. Willismson, Steven; 5046 Bartlett Blvd. Wolfe, Mmrvin; 1743 Wildhurst Ln. Wolfsteller, Gary; 2156 Csrdinsl Ln. Woy~cke, Gordon; Woytcke, Merlin; Wulf, Terrence; 1716 Bluebird Ln. 1701 Bluebird Ln. 2600 Ruby Ln. Wynkoop, Curtis; 4714 Hanover Rd. ~SUB TOTAL ABT no no yes no no no no 1-yes 8-no 25.00 25.oo 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.oo 25.oo 25.00 225.00 TYPE S S g S S S S S S 9-S PHONE, 472-5929 472-5912 472-6984 472-1723 472-4619 472-1917 472-1881 472-1089 472-6905 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 19, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-137 SUBJECT: Shooting Permits Section 51.33 of the City Code authorized the issuance of permits for the shooting of nuisance animals: "Upon application made together with payment of $1.00 the Chief of Police is hereby authorized, for good cause shown, to issue permits for the discharge of firearms, air guns or sling shots, or for the hunting of animals or birds by any means deemed suitable by him, for a period not exceeding 90 days for use consistent with the laws, rules and regulations of the State of Minnesota or its administrative departments, to such person or persons as he deems competent and suitable, and upon such conditions as he shall deem appropriate. The right to inspect and supervise the use of said permit shall in any event be retained in the Chief of Police and he shall have the right to summarily revoke each or any such permit upon his finding of abuse of the terms of such permit or unreasonable risk to person or property. In the event of such revocation no part of the license fee shall be refundable." (Ord. 177 - 10/15/64) When the above ordinance was passed the City was less densely populated and over the years few, if any, requests for shooting permits were ever denied. The Police Chief has reported that in recent years complaints about shooting have bee~'received and wonders if the Council wishes to continue or discon- tinue the permits. In addition in 1978~-Resolution 78-348, the Council directed the Police to discourage the use of leg hold traps (see copy attached). The Police Chief is asking for clarification of the Council's'desires: 1. Does the Council wish to continue with Section 51.33 or modify it? 2. Does the Council wish to better clarify Resolution 78-348 by either outlawing leg hold traps or allowing them? It is recommended that shooting of nuisance animals be outlawed except in extreme cases and that trapping be allowed with a permit. Shooting permits should require Council authorization. This will be listed for discussion on the April 24th meeting. cc: R. Morris CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 April 18, 1979 TO: FROH: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police Firearms - Hunting - Trapping Permits Section 51.33, Mound City Ordinance On July 25, 1978 the city council passed resolution 78-348 directing me to discourage the use of leg hold animal traps. The intent of this resolution is unclear as to if the use of firearms in taking animals should also be discouraged and just the use of live traps be encouraged. It would be help- ful if the council would consider this question on the use of firearms and traps and if change in the ordinance is found to be in the best interest of the city to go ahead and make necessary changes. Because of the increasing population' in the city and the close proximity of all residents to one another, it is my opinion that the use of firearms for taking animals should be prohibited. An exception to this may be in special and extreme or emergency cases and then only under the direction and control of the Police Department. It is my opinion that animals that are pests and destructive can most safely be eliminated with the use of traps. To date I have never heard a complaint or concern voiced by a citizen of Mound over the use of traps, either leg hold or live traps. I therefore recommend that the use of any appropriate and regularly used trap be allowed. Further, it is my opinion that in those cases where traps are set on private property for the elimination of a pest no permit should be required. Respectfully, Charles ~h6son Chief of Police CJ:lao fluly Z~, 1~78 Councilmember Lovaasen moved the following rcsolutioB, RESOLUTION 78-348 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER AND CHIEF OF POLICE TO DISCOURAGE THE USE OF LEG-HOLD ANIMAL TRAPS, 'SNARES OR OTHER TYPES OF TRAPS OTHER THAN CAGES AND BOX TRAPS WHEN ISSUING PERMITS UNDER SEC. 51.33 OF THE CITY CODE WHEREAS, Internatlon Ecology Society has requested time on the agenda, and WHEREAS, said Section 51.33 of the City Ordinance deals with the issuing of firearms, hunting and permits and does not specifically state that leg-hold traps are banned or restricted, and WHEREAS, said traps are considred dangerous to not only the animals but also children and domestic pets, and WHEREAS, it is hoped that the phrase "good cause" be more clearly defined in the issuing of said license or permit to hunt, trap or destroy birds or animals. NoW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the City Council does hereby authorize and directs the City Manager and Chief of Police to discourage the use of leg-hold animal traps, snares or other .types of traps other than cages and box traps when issuing permits under Sec. 51.33 of the City Code. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolutlon was duly seconded by member Fenstad, and upon vote being taken thereon, the followin§ voted in favor thereof: Lovaasen, Polston, Fenstad, Swenson, with Withhart abstaining, the following voted against the same, none, whereupon said resolution was de- clared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Mayor Attest: City Clerk 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 19, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-136 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Part of Lot 12, Block 4, Pembroke In February by Resolution 79-77, the Council authorized the purchase of a portion of the subject lot and the resale of the lot to the owner of Lot 12, Block 4. The City has purchased the piece of land and it recommended that the land be resold for $359.00. A resolution authorizing the sale price is requested. All that part of the westerly 36.00 feet of Lot 12, Block 4, PEMBROKE, Hennepin County, Minnesota according to the recorded plat thereof, which lies easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the northerly line of said Lot 12 distant 24.0 feet easterly of the northwest corner of said Lot 12; thence southwesterly to a point on the southerly line of said Lot 12 distant 29.0 feet easterly of the southwest corner of said Lot 12 and said line there terminating. McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. C0NSULTI~iG [NGI:~[[R$ · lA,iD SURV£YOR$ · $111 P/ANN[RS MINNEAPOLIS and HUTCHINSON. MINNFSOTA 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 18, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-37 SUBJECT: Police Report Mr. Helser had said that the report on the Police Study would be finished for the week of April 22. Due to the sudden death of his father, the report will be delayed about a week. A bill for a part of his services has been rendered and will be listed for payment. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 18, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-38 SUBJECT: Food and Nutrition Council Attached is a copy of material received by a Councilman regarding the Food and Nutrition Action Council. The suggestion has been made that the Council name a representative to attend the meetings of the Council. YOU ARE INVIC~ED 'To A MEETING OF THE WEST HENNEPiN ~ POOD iJTI BTiOi l:lCTlOri COUI CI · If you are. concerned-abOuL.. * ADEQUATE FOOD FOR YOUR FAMILY ..... *.: SCHOOL BREAKFAST AND LUNCH PROGRAMS * ELDERLY FOOD AND NUTRITION NEEDS * OTHER RELATED PROBLEMS * ^ FOOD CO-OP IN OUR COMMUNITY '~* PROBLEMS WITH THE FOOD STAMP PROGRAM ...then JOIN US!! COME TO THE MEETING OF THE FOOD AND NUTRITION ACTION COUNCIL TO: *LISTEN *VOICE YOUR CONCERNS *MEET WITH OTHERS WHO SHARE THESE CONCERNS MINNETONKA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM 14600 MINNETONKA BOULEVARD FREE DAY CARE AND REFRESHMENTS]I! FOR MORE INFORMATION CALL 920-5533, 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 18, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-39 SUBJECT: Minnetrista The meeting with Minnetrista for April 25th has been post- poned. A new date will be set. 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 19, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-40 SUBJECT: Meeting of April 17th The Council had a work session meeting on April 17 with the following present: Mayor Lovaasen, Councilmen Swenson, Withhart and Ulrick, the City Manager and the Building Inspector. William M. Goblirsch of Miller and Schroeder discussed Mortgage Revenue bonds. After discussion on a private bill for Mound, the Statewide Bill and other aspects, Lovaason moved and Swenson seconded a motion to support the Statewide legislation and to have a bill for Mound intro- duced. The action carried unanimously. Other items discussed were: 1. A meeting with the City of Minnetrista on April 25th. 2. Beachside land. 3. Junk in yard at R. Compton's. 4. Jerry Smith's' dock permit. 5. Sale of Part of Lot 12, Block 4, Pembroke 6. Possible changes in the dock ordinance. 4-24-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 20, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-41 SUBJECT: Metro Council Conference The Metro Council is having a one day conference Saturday, April 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., in St. Paul. Does any of the Council intend to attend? You are cordially invited to attend a Metropolitan Council State of the Region conferencc to analyze changes occurring in the Fully Developed part of the Region. Saturday, April 28, 1979 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The Cortile Landmark Center 75 W. 5th St., St. Paul 28, LETTER-LIM INATOR SENDER: REORDER FROM REGENT STANDARD FORMS, INC., AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK, PENNSAUKEN, N.J. I0 SNAP OUT YELLOW COPY ONLY. SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBON INTACT. TO SUBJECT: FOLD HERE FROM ' ,j~J~, g_,VILLAGE OF MOUND / 5545 Shoreline Boulevard ~'/' Mound, Minnesota . SIGNED FORM Iloo/s, REGENT FORMS, PERNSAUKEN, N. J. 08109 RECIPIENT: RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY LETTER-LIM 1NATOR CITY of MOUND April 19~ 1979 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Park Commission The City Manager Dock Ordinance One resident~ who had had a dock permit for 11 years, did not receive a permit this year, It seems he mailed the permit, but somehow the City didn't receive it. His dock space was assigned to another. The Council has asked that the procedure on dock permits be changed within the ordinance to provide that, at a certain point, a reminder be sent the previous year's dock permit holders advising them that their application had not been received. They also asked if the Park Commission would look at the ordinance from the standpoint of shared permits to see if such permits could keep sharing on a permanent basis. cc~ City Council CITY of MOUND April 19, 1979 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND. MINNESOTA 55384 (612) 472-1155 TO: The Police Chief FROM: The City Manager SUBJECT: Junk The Council, on Tuesday night, expressed their concern at the amount of "junk" in and around Hess Motors---some of the old car parts were on the street. Also in the City Parking Lot behind Hess, a junk car with no motor is standing. A special use permit has been issued Hess; please check with the Building Inspector on the use permit. ' Can we have a report back on what progress we are having in cleaning up this place?' have also received complaints about his dog running at large. '--~eonard L. Kopp ! ' cc: Building Inspector City Council :NE?IN L TO: FROH: SLiBJ ECl: DEPARTMENI' Or 'rr) ,x .qnQPTATl('bk 320 Washington Ay... South Hopkins, M.nnesota',_ 343 935-3381 April 18, 1979 Dennis L. Hansen - Hennepin County Traffic Engineer e.~ , 12~ -~ Temporary Closure of Coxt~ ~ (l'.rilshi:e Bl,;~ '~ at t?'e., bridge r~ver the channel from Cook's Bay to Emerald Lake On Wednesday, April 25, 1979, CSAH 125 will be closed for paving of the bridge over the channel from Cook's Bay to Emerald Lake. A marked detour will be provided via Bartlett Blvd. and CSAH 15. The channel from Cook's Bay to Emerald Lake will be open to boat traffic during construction. The temporary closure will be in effect approximately 2 weeks. DLH/WAH:pj .. cc: Minnesota Department of Transportation Wm Crawford, Dist. 5 Engineer R. M. Robinson, Dist. 5 Traffic Engineer Road Information & Permit Oqfice Hennepin County Commissioners Hennepin County Sheriff's Dept. Hennepin County Sheriff's Radio Tm~er Hennepin County Sheriff's Water Patrol .. Henn. County Bureau of Public Services A. J. Lee, Associate County Administrator Transportation Staff City of Mound Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager Eugene Garvais, Fire Chief Charles Johnson, Police Chief MTC Transit Operat. in9 Division 'K. Burkhardt, Director of Operations & Transportation Editor, Minneapolis Star & Tribune Editor, Sun Newspapers Radio Stations KDWB, KRSI, KQRS, WWTC, KSTP, WCCO, WDGY American Automobile Association Dennis R. Blends, Domestic Travel Dept. Methodist Hospital - Emergency Smith Ambulance Waconia Ridgeview Hospital - Ambulance Service North M£mor~al Med. Center- Emergent. Schoo~ Dist. 277 Westonka "" Superintendent ~ransportation Director HEMNEPIN COUNTY an cq,dol opporlunth, e~qnployer STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY'OF HENNEPIN 'DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT John Francis Valet and Mary Lou Valek, Plaintiffs, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Cor.poration, Glen L. Carlson,' Gordon J. Yenske, Joseph F. Warneke, and other Northern States Power Company investigators, unnamed; The City of Mound; Mound Police Department, Officer Herman L. Kraft; County Of Hennepin; Hennepin County Sheriff's Office, Narcotics Division, Michael J. Spillane, Richard C. Qualley, Walter J. Powers, Allen I. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) .) ) ) Anderson, Sgt.. Frank C. Kloss, Jr. and Thomas M. Michels, Defendants SUMMONS THE STATE OF MINESOTA TO THE ABOVE-NA~ DEFENDANTS: YOU'ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon Plaintiffs' attorney'an knswer to the Complaint which is herewith served upon you within twenty (20) days after service of this Summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, Judgment by Default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint. .- THOMSON & NORDBY DOUGI~' W. THOMSON Suite 15j~0 - 55 East Fifth St~ee~ Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone: 227-0856 Counsel for Plaintiffs THOMSON & NORDB¥ STATE OF }~INNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT John Francis Valek and Mary Lou Valek, Plaintiffs, Northern States Power Company, ) a Minnesota Corporation, Glen L. ) Carlson, Gordon J. Venske, ) Joseph F. Warneke, and other ) Northern States' Power Company ) investigators, unnamed; The ) City of Mound; Mound Police ) Department, Officer ~erman L.~ ) Kraft; County of Hennepin; ) Hennepin County Sheriff's Office, ) Narcotics Division, Michael J. ) Spillane, Richard C. Qualley, ) Walter J. Powers, Allen I. ) Anderson, Sgt. Frank C. Kloss, Jr.,) · and Thomas M. Michels, ) ) Defendants. ) ) COI~L~I~T Plaintiffs, f~r t~eir cause of action agains~ ~he defendants, Claim and allege as follows: COUNT ONE Plaintiffs are residents of the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and at all times hereinmen%ioned plaintiffs were, and still are, residing in the City of Spring Park. II. Defendant, Northern States Power Company. (N'.S.P.) was, and ~n~w is, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota, with its principal office at 414 Nicollet THOMSON & NORDBY Avenue, in the City of Minneapolis, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. III. Ail of the individuals named as defendants are residents of the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, except for defendant GORDON J. VENSKE, who is a resident of the County of Carver, State of Minnesota. IV. Ail of the other named'defendants not referred to in Paragraphs I. and II. have their DrinciDal place of business within the County 'of.Henn~pin, State of Minnesota. On or about October 14,'1977, defendant N.S.P., by and through its employees (defendants VENSKE; CARLSON, WA~NEKE, and other unnamed N.S.P. investigators) negligently ~nd/or intentionally supplied information %~ich instigated the unlawful arrest and false imprisonment of Plaintiffs. Said individual defendants supplied said information while acting within the course of their employment with defendant 'N.S.P. VI. The unlawful arrest and false imprisonment of both plaintiffs on October 14, 1977 and the assault and battery on plaintiff MARY Lou VALEK was caused, by and a ' direct result of the information supplied by defendant N.S.P.~ .through its employees listed in paragraph V. above, while acting within the course of their employment. VII. As a result, plaintiffs hive sustained the following damages: a) General damages' in a sum in excess of b) $50,000.00; Special damages in a sum of $10,000.00 to THOMSON & NORD~¥ LAWYERS compensate plaintiffs for the loss of present and future business at their antique shop; -2- c) unitive or exemplary ~s in a sum In excess of $50,000.00. COUNT TWO Plaintiffs for the second count of their Complaint against defendants, reallege all of %he allegations c~ntained in Count One and further state and allege: On or about October 14, 1977, at or about ~ o'clock P. M. at 4478 Shoreline Drive in Spring Park, defendants CITY OF MOUND, ~OUND POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF HENNEPIN' and ~ENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF's OFFICE, by and through its employees, (defendants KRA_~T, SPILLANE, QUALLEY, POWERS, ANDERSON, 'KLOSS and MICHELS),' while acting within the scope of their employment, caused plaintiffs to be unlawfully arrested a~d took plaintiffs into custody, all of which was against the will of said plaintiffs. In making the unlawful.arrest of plaintiff MARY LOU YALEK, defendants QUALLEY and ~PILLANE assaulted plaintiff, and wronufully, intentionally, and unlawfully secured plaintiffs' hands behind her back with handcuffs. Defendants QUALLEY and SPILLANE used such force in applying the handcuffs that it caused plaintiff to drop to her knees in pain. All of this was done without the consent of- plaintiff and placed plaintiff in fear of her safety and physical well being, and. caused her to submit to the confinement imposed by defendants. III. Both plaintiffs were taken to police headquarters located in the City of Minneapolis, County of Hennepin, . State of Minnesota and there were unlawfully detained and falsely imprisoned. When the handcuffs were. removed from plaintiff ~RY LOU VALEK for booking proceduring, her hands and ' THOMSON & NORDB¥ ~ fingers were-swollen Go such .an extent that it was not possible .' to obtain her fingerprints until some time after the swell.inghad subsidgd. The swelling~caused plaintiff to experience a great amount of discomfort and pain. V. Plaintiffs remained unlawfully imprisoned until after ~heir arraignment on October 15, 1977. Plaintiffs did not commit.any offense and repeatedly informed the defendants of this. Defendants did' not have any reasonabl~ grounds for believing that plaintiffs committed any offense. VII~ By reason of all of th~ foregoin9, Both plaintiffs suffered severe mental anguish and plaintiff ~RY LOU VALEK' also suffered 9rear physical pain. Plaintiffs have Been subjected to c0ntinuin9 humiliation and malingering in the community in w~ich°Lbhey-re§i~e-as a~.resutt-.Of'-th&~r wrongful imprisonment and have been damaged in name, reputation and business. ~s a result of the above, plaintiffs General damages in a sum in'excess of .$50,000.00; b) Special damages in a sum of $10,000.00 to compensate Plaintiffs for the loss of present and future business at their a~tique shop; c) Punitive or exemplary damages in a sum in excess of $50,000.00. COUNT THREE Plaintiffs for the third count of their Complaint against defendants, reallege all the allegations contained in Count One and Count Two and further state and allege: --4-- have sustained the foilowin9 damages: a) THOMSON & NORDBY On or about November 14, 1977, a Complaint-Warrant was issued by the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, naming plaintiffs as defendants. Pursuant to the Complaint, plaintiffs appeared at the HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF's OFFICE on or about November 15, 1977, at 6 o'clock A.M. Plaintiffs were again caused to be' unlawfully arrested by.defendants COUNTY OF HENNEPIN and tIENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF's OFFICE, by ahd through its employe~s while, acting within the scope of their.'employment. After. being arrested, plaintiff were required to remove all of their clothing and forced to submit to a very. thorough, .humiliating and Offensive naked search of their persons. Plaintiffs were also required to submit to other booking procedures, all of which was against the will of said plaintiff.· IV. " Plaintiffs were thereafter wrongfully imprisoned and detained until later that morning, after their arraign- ment.in Hennepin County DistriCt Court. ' V. Plaintiffs did not commit any ~ffe~se and defendants did not have any reasonable grounds for believing that plaintiffs committed any offense. VI. As a direct and proximate result of the false accusation, the unlawful arrest, imprisonment, and search, plaintiffs were humiliated, embarrassed, and shocked; suffered great and lasting mental anguish; wece thereby injured in their credit and business. As a result, plaintiffs have sustained the following damages: THOMSON & HORDBY LAWYER -5- a) General damages in a sum in exce~s of $50,00'0.00; - b) Special damages in a sum of $10,000.00 to compensate plaintiffs for the loss of present and future business at their antique shop; c) Punitive or exemplary damages in a sum in exces's of $50,000.00. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs demand judgment against defendants, both jointly and severally, in a sum in excess of $110,000.00, plus' interest, costs, and all other relief the court may deem just and equitable. THOMSON & NORDBY Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Telephone: 227-0856 Counsel for Plaintiffs Dated: APril 18 , 1979. -6- THOMSON & NORDBY STATE OF IlINNESOTA COUNTY OF I{ENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTtl JUDICIAL DISTRICT l~ark Alan Henderson, a minor, by llary Virginia Conkey, natural guardian and parent, Plaintiffs, VS. James Sahli, Timothy Joseph Sahli, the City of lIound and the County of Hennepin, Defendants. SUMMONS TPIE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO TtIE ABOVE-NAIleD DEFENDANTS: You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon plaintiffs' attorneys an answer to the complaint Which is herewith serve d upon you., within twenty (20) days after service of this summons upon you, exclu- sive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. GISLASO~ AND I~RTIN, P.A. Robert W. Gislason Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7600 Parklawn Avenue Edina, ~Iinnesota 55435 (612) 831-5793 S'i'A'.['E OF MINNESOTA COUNT! OF HENNEPIN COURT FOURTH JUdICIaL DISTRICT ~iark Alan Henderson, a minor, by lt'ary Virginia Conkey, natural guardian and parent, Plaintiffs, VS. James Sahli, Timothy Joseph Sahli, the City of Mound and the County of Hennepin, Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, for their causes of action against defendants and each of them, allege as follows' COUNT I. That at all times material defendant James Sahli was the owner of a certain 1970 Dodge bearing 1978 Minnesota License Plate Number CTS 352. That at all limes m~.terial, defendant Timonty Joseph Sahli ~as the operator of a motor vehicle described in Paragraph I, with the knowledge, conSent and permission of defendant Jam~s Sahli. That on or about July 14, 1978, plaintiff ~ark Henderson was a passenger in an automobile being operated by Timothy joseph Sahli when it collided with a vehicle being operated by Trevor J. Sandness on Hennepin County Road Number 15 (a/k/a Shoreline Drive) approximately 229 feet west of its intersection with Cypress Lane in the Cit~ of ~Iound, County of Hennepin, and State of ~innesota. That the accident described above was directly and proximately caused by the negligence, carelessness, wrongful and unlawful conduct of defendant Timothy Joseph Sahli in his operation of the above- described motor vehicle at said time and place. That at the time an d place of the'accident referred to above, defendant Timothy Sahli was operating the vehicle owned by defendant James Sahli with his knowledge and consent. COUNT II. I. That at all times herein material, defendant City of Mound operated a municipal liquor store known as the Mound Municipal Liquor Store and that on or about Ju,ly 14, 1978, said liquor store in violation of Minnesota Statutes sold intoxicating beverages to defendant Timothy Joseph Sahli who was at that time under 19 years of age. II. That as a direct and proximate result of the unlawful and illegal sale of intoxicating beverages to defendant Timothy Joseph Sahli, he became intoxicated and that as a partial result of such intoxication, . defendant Timothy Sahli operated the motor vehicle in a negligent and careless manner causing the collision referred to in Count I. above. III. That notice has~been given to the City of Mound in accordance with Minnesota Statutes concerning the violation of the ~innesota Dram Shop Act. COUNT III. I. That at all times herein material, defendant Hennepin Count-y maintained,' serviced, owned, and controlled a certain public thorough' ~are known as Hennepin County Road Number 15 in the City of Mound and County of Hennepin. II. That at the time and place of the accident referred to above and in the time period leading up to said accident, defendant Hennepin County was negligent and careless in maintaining a defective and dan- gerous condition'in respect to Hennepin' County Road Number 15 at or near its intersection with Cypress Lane in that there were inadequate warnings concerning the true and actual nature of said road and the markings on the thoroughfare at the area where the accident were mis- leading and were a direct and proximate cause of the accident referred to above. ' 2 That as a direct and proximate result of the unlawful acts of all of the 'defendants as listed in counts I through III above, plaintiff ~Iark Alan tIenderson was caused to sustain serious, painful, disabling, and permanent injuries to his body and to his entire nervous system and that he has sustained and will in the future sustain a loss of income and a loss of earning capacity and that he has suffered emotional distress and mental anguish as a result of the injuries which he has sustained all to his general damages in an amount not less than $50,000.00. That in an effort to treat and cure Mark Alan Henderson in respect to the serious and disabling injuries sustained by him, plaintiff ~ary Virginia Conkey has been caused to incur substantial and continuing medical expenses and will incur such expenses into the futUre in the minimal amount of $8,000.00. V. That plaintiff Mary Conkey has klso sustained damages in loss of means of support from plaintiff Mark Alan Henderson, her son, in an amount not less than $10,000.00. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray for judgment against the defendants and each of them in an amount not less than $50,000.00 together with an award representing their reasonable costs and disbursements herein'. ., GISLASON AND MARTIN, P.A. By Jam~s T. 5lartin Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7600 Parklawn Avenue South · Edina, Minnesota 55435 (612) 831-5793 3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON CONDITIONAL SIGN USE PERMIT Noti~oe~s hereby .g-~'~he Planning & Zoning Co~ission will h61d a public ~earing at 9:00 pm on ~onday, April 23, 1979, at ~he Minnetrista City Hall .~, At _ that time and plac~they will hear the reques~l~ed by Mr. D_~i~hompson, 432 S.E. 6th - Street, Mpls., .-~.,n for a Conditional Sign Use Permit on property legally described as follows: That part of Lot 2, Sec. 22, Township 117, Range 24 described as follows: Commencing on the W line of Govt. Lot 2, Sec. 22-117-24 at a point 325.07 feet north of the SW corner of said lot; thence Southeasterly along the Westerly line of Halsted Park produced 266.5 to Northwesterly side of Halsted Ave. in said addition, thence northeasterly along Halsted Ave. a distance of 520.8 ft to the Easterly l~ne of Koehler St. which point is the point of beginning of the land to be described, thence continuing northeasterly along the northerly line of Halsted Ave. a distance of 329.2 ft to its inter- section with the Easterly line of Halsted's Park extended; thence northwesterly along Easterly line of Halsted Park extended a distance of 242.5 ft to its intersection with a line parallel with 'and 11.2 chains E of the W line of Govt. Lot 2, thence North along said line to the center of County road a distance of 249.86 ft; thence Westerly along the center line of County road 477.0 feet to the E line of Koehler St., thence Southeasterly at an angle of 88 degrees 45 minutes a distance of 281 ft., thence at an angle to the left of this line extended of 18 degrees 17 minutes a distance of 164.0 ft, thence at an angle of 10 degrees 27 minutes to the left of this line extended a distance of 89.1 ft to p6int of beqinning. Located along the South side of County Road 110 .~nea~ Hatstead Avenue. If you wish to express your concerns in either written or oral form, it should be done at the public hearing or by letter received in this office no later than Monday, April 23, 1979, 4:30 pm. Tom Link Zoning Adm. 7701 Co.Rd. 110 W. Mound, Mn. 55364 g73 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency April 3, 1979 METROPOLITAN AREA GOVERNMENTAL UNITS To Whom It May Concern; This is to notify you that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has received the Metropolitan Council's 208 or Water Quality Management (WQM) Plan for the 7-County Metro Area. On March 8, 1979, the Metropolitan Council adopted the 208 Plan and has officially sub- itted the 208 Plan to the MPCA. In accordance with federal require- ments, the MPCA has 120 days to review and have the Governor certify the Metropolitan Council's 208 Plan to the U.S. Environmental Protec- tion Agency (EPA). Over the past two years, you have received numerous documents from the Metropolitan Council concerning their 208 or WQM planning efforts. They completed this phase of the planning effort and held a public hearing on JanUary 25, 1979, to receive final comment on the 208 Plan. As the agency responsible for 208 planning in the state of Minnesota, the MPCA would like to impress upon you the importance of the Metro- politan Council's 208 Plan. Once this 208 Plan is approved by the state of Minnesota, all subsequent 201 (facilities) planning and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits must be con- sistent with it. The Metropolitan Council's 208 Plan details such things as population and waste flow projection; treatment plant needs, both present and future; and the entities responsible for the various planning and management phases of waste management systems. The MPCA will notify all concerned parties of the Agency's intended actions after our review is completed in late May 1979. The MPCA Board will then take the appropriate action and request the Governor to certify the Metropolitan Council's 208 Plan to EPA by July 1979. This letter is to serve as notification of the Agency's responsibili- ties in reviewing, approving, and seeking the Governor's certification of the Metropolitan Council's 208 Plan. If you have any questions regarding this process, please contact Paul Davis (296-7241) or Deborah Pile (296-7216) of my staff. Yours tr.u~y, ~ Ter;y H~f fma~ Executive Director TH:dfm Phon e: _(. 6-t-:2-)-~ 2:96_- 7 3 01 1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Regional Qffices · Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Oppodunity Employer POLIC~CRIME ACTIVITY REPOR Cities o~., MOUNDt SPRING PARKt ' Month March MINNI'2TRISTA & ST. BONIFACIUS Year 197_____9 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS YEA R LAST YEAR · ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE ' TO DATE Traffic control (citations & %varnings.) 379 1215 1'300 DWI ........ ~... ...... ~7 ..... 27 Property damage accident .' 27 96 · 7 I Personal injury accident i 11. 24 · Fatal accident . 1 ! 0 :%dult felony & misdemeanor arrests · ~- 11 .. 30 50 Iuvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests 5 28 17 18 .45 51 animal complaints ! 16 324 4'77 Part I & Par~ II offenses 42 139 220 Otb-er general investigations 79! 2365 1872 , ., , '"' T . ' -.~ , .... i~ '. '2. ~' 7' ;_£ [ ....... .,', - -~ , , , · '" rOTA b i 394 4271 4109 . 'II. PRO.~E. RTY LOSS/R~OVERY SUMMARY ALL CITIES COM, B. I N EDv,/ Bikes ITEM Boats Clothing Currency, notes, etc. Jewelry & preciou~ metals Guns .:Iome Furnishings Iadio & Electronic equipment S TO LEN 575 326 400 Vehicle's & vehicle equipnuent 564 Mi s celia neous ! 655 FOTAL $ 3,520 RI~COVERED lO0 $ 100 . III. OFFENSE ACTIV! SUMMARY Ail cities ¢omb'Jned -0 ~ MonMcicle ............ R~p~ .. . , ...... ! 1 , _ _ Robbery .... , Assault Bur¢lary . 10 .]0 1 Meh{cle Theft ,, 1 TOTAL 23 2 21 0 2 2 :PART II GRIM]ES Arson F__(2!'~er¥~ &_~,°.unterfelting _ 1 . ] , Fraud .................... -~n~bezZlen~ent ........ Stolen .l?~oper. ty ......... I ] , ] ¥~nclalism ~ 7 ..... 7 ..... %Veapons ] 1 . Prost~tut;_on & commerci~[lized Vice ....... Se>: Offenses ... ....... ~zrc____o.tic drag laTM " 2 . Gambling bf£enses against ~.a. mil Driv~-ng under the influence ..... g _3. ., 3 ,_, Liouor Laws Public Peac,: ......... All other offenses 2 TO2t~AI' 21 0 2l 0 9 3 42 0 POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REI~ORT C~ty of MOUND l~onth Harch '~ear 197_____9 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS YEAR LAST YEAR ~%CTIVITY IVION TH TO DA TE TO DATE I'raffic control (Citations & ~varnlngs} '. 239 840 858 DY"rI 0 7 - 16- Property damage accident Personal injury acc[dent 0 4 .15 'Fatal accident 0 0 '0 Adult felony ~ misdemeanor arrests · 3 15 31 ruventle felony ~ misdemeanor arrests 3- 16 13 Medicals. 12 28 ' 37 tnimal complaints 95. 250 383 ' Part I & Part II offenses " . ' ]8 82 142 Other general investig.atlons 495 1416 !i98 FOTA L 876 2708 2733 II. MOUND Bikes S l o thing ITEM STOLEN '475 RECOVERED Currency, notes, etc. rewelry & precious metals Guns Home Furnishings Radio & ]Electronic equipment .' Vehicles & vehicle equipment Mis'cellaneous TOTAL (for individual city) GRAND ;J['OTAL (ali cities combined) 400 ~00 1045 2,320 3,520 $ lO0 OFFENSE ACTIVI~. SUiN4MAR Y MOUND PART I CRIMES O ~dult ~uv. Hon~ic~de ........... Robbery , . AsSault ............ - Yeh~cle Theft , , 1 TOTAL :'PART II 'CRIMES Arson ........ . , Fraud . ]~mbezzlen~ent , ,, ... , Stolen Property, ..' ...... ] , ·. I .... ., ]_ )V, ezpo~ ........... Prostitution ~ C0mmerc'ia]ized Vice Sex Offenses Narcotic drug la%Vs .,2 ..... 2 2 Offenses ~inst'familY. & children ......... Dr~vlng under the ~nfluence ............ L~ ouor Public Peace All other offenses TOTAL '10 0 10 0 2 TOTAL ].:'/~]'{T I & I)AI{T II CRIME-~, I:~OLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY t{Ei~ORT City of . SPRING ~I~RK Month March Yea r 1979 /.' I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY " THIS ~fEAR LAST YEAR ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE I'raffic control (citations & Warnings} 100 260 290 " D%VI .. --.I 6 ' 3.' .-- Property. damage accldent -. Personal injury accident '1 3 h '- Fatal accident ' ' · - 1 1 0 Adult felony & misdemeanor arrests · 3 7 9 ~uvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests 2 I 1.. .4 Medicals .. ¢ ~nimal complaints. - !0 23. 2h · - Part I ~< Part II offenses .. 10 32 29 Other general investigations 152 505 363 FOTA L 292 872 746 [IMIC ACTIVITY ..~?dlty of M I NNETR I S' Month March t~ Year .1979 './/.. I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS YEA R LAST YEAR ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Traffic control (citations & Warnings) ': 16 48 61 DWI · .. .- ..1 2 4 ' '... Property dan~age accident 6.-, " 19 16' '. Dersonal injury accident " - · . .. .. 0 2 '3- Fa tal accid'ent " 0 0 '0' Adult felony & misdemeanor arrests Juvenile felony 1~, misdemeanor arrests .. O. ! 0 Medicals. 3 10 3, Animal complaints ' 9' 49 . 64. ' . Part I & Part II offenses -. 1o 17 36 Other general investigations 105 349 --237 TOTAL 154 502' 430 City o[ St. B0~I~ACIUS Month MARCH Year 1979 GENERAb AGTIVITY SUMMARY THIS YEA R LAST YEAR ACTIVITY MON TH TO DA TE TO DATE Traffic control (citations & Warnings} 24 67 91 ' DY~rI I 2 ' 4 [Property danaage accident !Personal injury accident 0 2 '2' IFa tal accident 0 0 O' Adult felony ~ misdemeanor arrests · 1 2 4 Tuvenile felony ~ misdemeanor arrests 0 0 0 Medicala 0 O' 2 Ammal complaints -- -.'- 2 2' Part I ~< Part II offenses 4 8 13 Other general investigations 39 95 74 TOTAL 72 188 200 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota 4-~-79 April 17, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-36 SUBJECT: Mortgage Revenue Bonds Attached are copies of two items furnished by Miller and Schroeder. One item is a Copy of a proposed bill for Moorhead which would be the same except for the name, if Mound asked for Special Legislation and the other is a proposed resolution authorizing Miller and Schroeder to act for Mound, if the necessary legislation is passed. RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Mound, County of Hennepin (the "City"), in anticipation of certain legislation to be adopted during the 1979 term of the Minnesota Legislature, intends to adopt legislation to provide for the issuance of, and intends to issue, revenue bonds to finance residential mortgages; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide a program for the issuance of such bonds; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide for the development of such a program and the negotiation of a contract or contracts for the sale of such bonds, and in connection therewith has had conferences with Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. of Minneapolis; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: Section 1. Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc. of Minneapolis ("Miller & Schroeder") is hereby authorized and selected to assist the City in developing a program for the offer and sale of revenue bonds to finance residential mortgages to be originated in such manner as the City and Miller & Schroeder shall reasonably determine. Section 2. In consideration of Miller & Schroeder's services in assisting the City in the development of such program, the City agrees that such bonds shall be sold to Miller & Schroeder or a group of under- writers represented by Miller & Schroeder pursuant to such terms and conditions as shall be negotiated in good faith by the City and Miller & Schroeder (the sale of such bonds to Miller & Schroeder shall constitute the sole compensation of its services). The City shall be under no obligation to use, and shall not use, any of its general funds in con- nection therewith, and shall not be liable to Miller & Schroeder for any expenses incurred in connection therewith. Section 3. The issuance of bonds pursuant to the program to be developed by the City and Miller & Schroeder is subject in all respects to the approval by the City, acting in good faith, of all agreements and other documents reasonably necessary to complete such issuance. Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption and approval. --2'- Passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Mound, County of Hennepin, this day of , 1979. Signed and Approved: , 1979 Mayor Passed: , 1979 .~pproved: , 1979 City Clerk SENATE STATE OF MINNESOTA SEVENTY-FIRST LEGISLATURE PRINTED 91 S.F. o. 26 Introduced by Sillers, Moe and Ueland, A. Read First Time Jan. 8, 1979, and Referred to the Committee on Local Government. Committee Recommendation. To Pass as Amended and Re-referred to the Committee on Energy and Housing. Committee Report Adopted Mar. 5, 1979. Committee Recommendation. To Pass as Amended. Committee Report Adopted Mar. 15, 1979. Read Second Time Mar. 15, 1979. Referred to the Subcommittee on Bill Scheduling Mar. 15, 1979. 2 4 5 A bi lr for an act relating to the city of l~oorhead; authorizing a housing finance program and providing for the issuance of revenue bonds to finance the program. 6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISCATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 7 Section I- The legislature finds that p£eservation af 8 the quality of life in a rural city is dependent upon the 9 maintenance, provision, and preservation of an adequate ]0 .housing stock; that accompFishing this is a pubtic purpose; Il. that there are many housing units in the city of Moorhead 12_ that do not meet the appr[cable housing codes, some of 13 which can be rehabilitated~ that a need exists to proY~de 14 in a timely fashion affordable housing to persons of [ow 15 and moderate income existing znd expected to reside in the city of Moorhead; that a need exists for mortgage credit ':o 17 be made available for new construction; that refinancing 18 ex[sting mortgages wi[r alrow owners of housing un,ts which 19 need rehabilitation to take advantage of existing 20 rehabititation programs; and that many owners, would-be 21 purchasers or providers of housing units are either unable 22 to afford mortgage credit at market rates of interest or to SFOO26-2E (REVISOR obtain mortgage c~edit because the momtgage credit at the highest rates permitted by ['aw is not a. vairable. Sec. 2- Subdivision ~. The city of Hoorhead may develop and administer a pr-ogcam to finance the construction of new and the improvement of ex[sting housing, and the purchase of either, £ocated anywhere within its boundaries as of January 1, 1979~ for occupancy primarily*by persons of row and moderate income, to achieve the purposes set forth in section 1; pro, ideal that rn 15 17 18 19 .20 21 I0 .de~reloping the program, the city shall consider: 11 {a} The availability and affordability of other 12 governmental, prog:ams; I3 {bi The availability and affordabt[ity of private I~ market financing for rehabFlitation and new construction; (c) Whether refinancing existing mortgages wi l~l enable rehaSi [itation of housing units under a state oc Ioca~ ho~sing rehabilitation program; (d) The need for rehabilitating housing units acquired from'~ governmenta! bodies and agencies; (el The need for additional mortgage credit to e'ncourage the purcha'se of rehabilitated housing ungts from ... 22. governmental bodies and ~gencies; and 23 [ f} The need for additional mortgage credit to 2~. enco'urage the purchase of housing units which are located 25 on property which governmental bodies or agencies have 26 acquired and made suitable for housing construction. 27 Subd. Z. The city council shall~ bY ordinance~ 28 promulgate regulations for this program. Loans shai! not 29 be made when the city determines that financing is 30 otherwise avaitable from private ienders upon terms and 31 conditions which are as favorable as provided by the c~ty 32 in its regulations. 33 Subd.. 3. ~o finance the program authorized by this SFOO26-2E <RE¥ !SOR ) SF 26 SECOND ENGROS. S~ENT 1 section, the city council of the city of Hoorhead amy, by 2 resolution authorize, 3 other obligations at public o= pri~ate sale after proper public notice of private sale, which are payable sole~ff 5 from the revenues of the programs authorized by sections 6 to q. The total amount of revenue bonds authorized to be 7 issued for l~e purposes of th~s act shall not exceed 8 $20 ,DO0,000 - 9 Sec. 3. Subdivision I. in the making oz purchase o! lO loans or other securities in furtherance of the programs authorized in section 2, and in the issuance of revenue bonds or other obtigations pursuant to sect ion 2, the city 13 of Hoorhead may exercise, or may by ordinance authorize an existing agency or an agency created by ordinance to 15 exercise~ within the corporate limits of the city, any of 16 the powers the Hinnesota housing finance agency is authorized to exe=cise under the provisions of l~innesota 18 Statutes, Chapter Subd.'2.. The city council shall not amend the 20 regulations adopted by ordinance and ~n effect at the time 21 a'ny bonds or obligations authorized by sections I to ~ are 22, issued~ to the detriment of the hoi'der of the bonds 23 ob gigations. 2z~ Sec. z~. This act takes effect when approved by a 25 majority of the city council of the city of Roorhead and 26 upon compl iance with M~nnesota Statutes, Sect ion 645.0Z1. 3 .allow for the reasons you can't find vi- prices set not tn the marketplace olations, by politicians. A New WaY.to Go The WOuld-be home-owners started ins the volume of businessl ; lining up outside New Orleans banks ,at 4 a.m. the other day, waiting to · ~apply for mprtgages at interest rates L a full two percentage points below the '~going rates.' The bargain-basement ~;'funding was provided by a municipal ..issue of single-family mortgage bonds, r currently the hottest fad on the mu- -' nicipal.bond market. · .- : Since P..F. Hutton C~.' persuaded ' Chicago to try the first $100 million is- : ,.'sue last July, the outstanding volume : 7_of these bonds has increased ten-fold. · ';'.At least 22 localities in eight states :~,~" had .issued them by the end of the ~ year, and more and more jurisdictions .' are hurrying into the act. Before this : goes much further, however, states would be well advised to imitate the : example of the Louisiana Bond Corn- ~.. · ¥a . mission, which after the New Orleans ,, - ~, - ' sale declared a moratorium on further ~.::,., . . . ,,: such bond issues in the state. :' ~ ?;. -'' ; The Bond Commission, alarmed by the of these wanted , ..~..... ..: ,.xv,,.s,on ,~, · .:...; 1, . :, some time to sort out their implica- · .':' '" tions. And well it might. The success · of the $85 million New Orleans issue ! had prompted suburban parishes to .'/prepare their own,. and a proposal had ,: surfaced for a ~ million state-wide ',. program. ":'.- : .... - '. The popularity of these bonds has little to do with their intrinsic merit. ~' The politicians like them .because the lower interest rate provides a much- welcomed subsidy for middle-class -voters. Banks like them because they can commit these funds to higher risk loans, thus satisfying the federal "anti-redlining" provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act without endangering their own assets. In states like Louisiana that inflict upon themselves "usury limits" below the national average of mortgage interest rates, these bonds help maintain some trickle of money for mortgage loans. The bond market has been recep-' · tire to these suspect new bonds ironi- cally because of federal regulation. · Controversial Treasury regulations have been successful m eliminating "advance refunding" bonds, thus cut- ting the supply of municipal bonds by some. 169'o, so the new issues have · -been sucked up by the undiminished demand. Bond counsels and under- writers have interposed no objection, since their profits depend on maintain- # All this activity has drowned out the serious criticism of these bonds, but these cities, counties and bond-is- suing authorities will continue to ig- nore the doubters at their own peril. The use of government borrowing for single-family mortgages carries all the flaws, and more, that we believe afflict such borrowing for multi-family mortgages, such as New York's Mitchell-Lama fiasco .... The single-family bonds 'a~d~nult{- family bonds could face the same dilem- ma. They could all go strictly for safe loans, in which case they compete with banks and S&Ls for middle-class clients. But in that case they dole out a subsidy arbitrarily and for no appar- ent social good. Or the loans can tar- get higher-risk, low-income families: In tha[ case, the rate of defaults will be 'higher, and local taxpayers.will wind up with the bill. (The city could also try to shift the loss to the unwary bondholder, but such a short-sighted move-.would hurt their credit across the hoard.) . :' -.' The ultimate losers may be not only cities like Chicago and New OP- leans, however, but all the govern- merits benefiting from the tax-exempt bond market. One way or another, the tide of mortgage bonds will tend to de- stroy the advantage of tax-exempt in- terest rates, either by vastly increas- ing the risks of-tax exempts or by flooding the market, or both. Although some federal figures are beginning to raise the alarm, there may be strate- gists in the Treasury who WOuld prefer to let this fad get even further out of control. Municipal issuers have been preparing legislation to limit Trea- sury's power to regulate municipal bonds, and Treasury's. hand in Con- gress 'can only be strengthened by the lack of self control 'displayed in the municipai governments' home mort- gage bond orgy. If municipal issuers wish to pre- serve their fiscal autonomy', they will have to show more ability to police themselves. It's time for state and lo-- cai bond overseers and professional groups like the Municipal Finance Of- fleers Association and the Public Se- curities Association to follow the lead of the Louisiana Bond Commission' and put dampers on the home mort- gage bond boom.. Word Game : In days ·of old, Iused to work As hard as I was able. "A conscientious lass," they said, "8o ~nsible and stable." Now terrrm and times, alas, have changed- . A state I find oppressive. '.Today the need for careful · work .... Is dial~aosed. -,. THE WALL $?REET JOURNAL iNTERNAL· . RE[VENUE tlon that should go to a 'cu The opportunity for high ployes to grow into higher should increase performano ternal staffing has unique h a panacea, and it can be I've knowu executives, who have hired a reeruite cancy in their divislon-no~ wanted to find the best ~ available, but to gain a wu: ship with a well-known scan executives usually feel thei blocked and see exposure to a valuable first step in th away" plan. Few large companies go ~ slstance of a recruiting firm: It's an ua,mitten recruiter': "'hands;off" policy applies { years to contacting manaRe{ poration retaining the recn several companies thatdefen: cruiters every year or so just away from their flock for the moratorium. ,~,- · 'The morale of key executi~ th~portant factor in .hiring decisions. Highly motivated managers no loni boss finally decides it's time up a notch. Blind loyalty to is passe. So, the wise vice man resources should the risks of frustratin ers before bringing in an Job.they covet. Ideally, if an be hired, it should be a tion, and the recruit well passed over clearly gency, ' .'.. :: ..-:., Only in unusual situations upset a-company's structure by offering tion package to a ample of a company that from its formal labor when recruiting Outside ins full well that ways spreads, CBS won't the morale o! valued .difficulty, companies may be jecttng an outsider's excessive mantis. ~ .On the other ha:id, there where external staffing is choice.. Rapid technological change; ple, can force entire industries order to remain competitive. dustry, for example, was in when electronics became anint of its products. Within the- years, Mattel Toys has set up les division, and Parker brought In a marketing tronic [,ames and toys who was With a large, high Executives with the moat retable" skills are still those functions. They have a p~ticular which cannot be developed training: Attorneys, human financial vice presidents, public directors and, believe it or utives. Superior ply the same management fectiveiy in any organizational sett the benefits of recruiting individu these skill~ are not always underst The experience mix. of the seni agement team is another major corporations there are usu~ to eight people who and I recommend that 10% to group be "outsiders"-that is. got the bulk of their training else~; insure broad-based tain this mix at the top. personnel should plan accordingly when whether to hire a middle manage the o,,t~,,o ,, ....... CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 13, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79 - 35~ SUBJECT: Siren ~On Thursday, 4-12-79, at 3:00 A.M. the Island Park Siren started blowing and wouldn't stop, even after turning off the switches in the Police Office. The electrician looked at the problem and said that water got into the enclosure, holding the electrlcal apparatus for the Island Park Siren; The water shorted out the relay. The relay is completely ruined and will be replaced shortly. LLK/dd ON LAKE MINNETONKA INDIAN BURIAL MOUNDB 534] MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 Apr i.1 1 3, 1979 (6z2) 472-~z55 McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. Mr. Lyle Swanson 12805 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, .Minn. 55441 Lyle: Subject: Sewer Inspection Attached is a copy of a letter received from the Metro Waste Control Commission requesting information regarding our inspection and repair program. Since we might be eliglble for some Federal funds, let's get this to. him as quickly as possible. LLK/dd cc: R. Shanley City Council eric: Respectful ly, -"~opp OLITAn 7'TE oFITROL mmi//Ion 350 ~ETPO/OU~RE BLDG. 7,TH~ ROSER T /'FR£ET/ 61'2 '2'22.842~ April 10, 1979 Mr. Leonard L. Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp: Thank you very much for your resPonse to our letter of March 1, 1979 regarding infiltration/inflow (I/I) into your sewer system and informing the Commission that you have undertaken a program to reduce and/or eliminate I/! into the sewer system. It would be appreciated if the City would furnish the Commission with an annual report on the findings and progress made to reduce I/I. The Commission .is conducting 201 Facility Planning for the metro- politan area in which an I/I analysis will be made for each community. Federal and State financial assistance may be available for corrections of excessive I/I problems if found to be cost effective. The Commission is also concerned that I/I be controlled at a minimum level into our facilities. In order to do this we will continue to make periodic inspections on the condition of our facilities and undertake whatever improvements are necessary to reduce and/or eliminate excess I/I into our facilities. As a matter or practice, the Commission intends to inform your City on a regularbasis when we are experiencing abnormally high waste- water flow during and following rainfall occurrences. This practice · should be helpful in identifying problems of excess I/I. We trust that'this mutual concern for reducing and/or removing I/I will be beneficial to both the City and Commission in that the length of service of both our faai'lities will be extended when capacity is not required to handle excess I/I. Very truT//~.urs, Ric~h~ard J. Dougherty Chief Administrator RJD:RAO:hw 4-17-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 12, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-34 SUBJECT: Workshop Meeting - Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds The Council set the date of April 17, 1979 at 7:30 P.M. as a council Workshop Meeting regarding Residential Mortgage Revenue Bonds. A representative of Miller and Schroeder Municipals, Inc. will be present at this meeting. Miller & Schroeder is preparing a bill to present to the legislature asking for permission for certain cities to issue Mortgage Revenue Bonds and will include Mound, if the Council desires. I told them to temporarily include Mound's name until the Council could say yes or no. 4-17-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota April 12, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-35 SUBJECT: Meeting with Minnetrista A copy of Minnetrista's note of April 6 was sent the Council. No one objected to the April 25th meeting date suggested. If there are no further objections, we will go ahead with the 25th of April date. Leo~ard L. Kopp cc: Chief Johnson Chief Garvais Finance ~lounting billions are being fed into housing via municipal securities. But Washington now is raising complaints that could force a change .... ... The government is getting worried t~bout a ne~v type of tax-free bond that is soaring in popularity with investors, local officials and home buyers. ' ' The bond, issued by a growing list of eries and counties since last summer, is designed to provide cheap mortgage money for the purchase or repair of houses, most of which--but not allM are in run-down neighborhoods. : Congress is now threatening to step in to remove the tax-free .status of these bonds. President Garter wants to put restrictions on their use. So do many'federal agencies. What concerns Washington, among ·: other thiz~gs, are the loss of income to the Treasury and the use of this new device to finance loans to the wealthy. ltere is how the financing ~vorks: ' Local governments sell the bonds on which interest is exempt from federal income tax, and often state tax, too. Proceeds are turned over to local lend- ers, usually savings and loan associ- ations, which then lend the money on mortgages to people buying homes. Because the tax-free feature enables the city to borrow at a relatively low rate, the mortgages in turn carry rates g to 9.Va percentage points below.those generally available. The home buyers' monthly mort- gage payments, minus a slieo that stays with the lending institution, are chan- neled to a trustee svho uses the funds.to pay interest to the bondholders and eventually to redeem the bonds. As an added attraction to bondhold-. ers, homeowners are required to take out insurance policies that guarantee mortgage payments. A dream for cities. Costs to dries are about nil. Thrift institutions take care of servicing the loans in return for their portion of the monthly payments, and localities do not have to put their "full faith and credit" behind the bonds. The arrangement seems like a dream come true to many city officials. It fos- ters rehabilitation of housing in down- town neighborhoods and slows the flight to suburbs. It pleases both the U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT, April 16, 1979 ' sellers and buyers of homes without expense to local taxpayers. And, up to now, there has been no red tape from Whshington. Thus, it's no wonder that sales ~f these special housing bonds have spread rapidly since they were intro- duced in Chicago and Minneapolis last summer. By the end of last year, about 430 million dollars' worth of the bonds had been sold. '- So far this year, cities have issued additional housing bonds ~vorth more than. 1.1 billion dollars. The pace of sales slowed for'a time while city offi- cials awaited results of several studies on' the impact of this type of financing. Reactions to those studies svere mainly favorable, and by mid-March the bond market was deluged by new offerings. All told, at least 33 localities have already issued the bonds. Many more have announced plans to do so. Chica- go this spring offered its second batch~worth 150 million dollars. . .How fast and how far the mortgage- bond idea proliferates depends in part on state laws. In 15 states, localities have specific 'authority to issue the bonds. Fifteen states have clear prohi- bitions against them. But. Georgia this month is expected to drop its ban on the bonds. In other state~ where the bonds are not dearly outlawed, their status is hazy, according to a study by the Unit- ed States League of Savings Associ- ations. Legislation is pending in about 13 states to authorize the bonds. Even if only a few more states allow them, as much as 9..5 billion dollars' worth will be sold this year, according to one calculation. Other estimates ex- ceed 5 billion dollars. Some major brokerage houses are setting up special units to handle the expected rush of business. Treasury criticism. The bond plan has its critics, however. The Treasury dislikes seeing millions of dollars in in- terest escaping federal income tax. One' analyst figures that each billion dollars in tax-free mortgage bonds means annual revenues of 26 million dollars that will not be. collected. An- other analyst calculates that by 1984 the federal goverru'nent could be losing more than 2 billion dollars annually if expansion of these bonds is not throt- tled down. - - The Treasury 'also worries that the bonds, by drawing more buyers into the housing market, tend to drive the prices of houses higher. - ' The Department of Housing and Ur- ban Development is irked by the fact that' savings and loan institutions, with only broad local guidelines, decide who gets the low-interest mortgages. HUD officials think that too much of the money is going to help middle and up- per-income people who would buy and renovate anyway. HUD would prefer to see local housing agencies 'doling out the funds to the needy. As things stand, each city sets its o~vn iimits on the income that a family can have and still qualify for mortgages un- Municipal Mortgage Bdnds~Where They're Legal As of late March, 1979 States that ~ Stat~ that ~Legality permit bonds ~prohibit bonds I lunclear ~/ /_i der the pi:re. Anchorage, Alask~, allows fuuds to be loaned to households earn- ing up to 860,000 a year; Evanston, I11., 850,000. Some cities set no income lim- its but specify the types of homes and Iocatious where this financing eau be used. A study by the Dean Witter Reyu- olds, Inc., investment house supports tlUD's positiou. It concludes that it is "questionable" whether private inter- ests can fairly administer a pubtie-pur- pose program without supervisiou by a. public body. The same report warns that cities, if they turn the proceeds of. the bonds over to a single lending insti- tution to handle, may open themselves up to suits under antitrust laws. The Federal Home Loan B'.ank Board supports the concept of tax-exempt mortgage bonds. But, like HUD, it wants income limits on participating home buyers, a lid on the size of mort- gages, and targeting' of loans to houses in specific neighborhoods.. "inappropriate use." Within the fi- nanelal community, opinion is divided. The United States League of Savings 'Associations contends that the bonds are an "inappropriate use of municipal authority" and that this type of financ- ing could upset the mortgage market. On the other hand, a number of the league's own members are making loans under these plans. City groups, such as the League o~ Cities and the Municipal Finance Offi- cers Association, wonder if large-scale offerings of the mortgage bonds will lead to higher interest rates on tax- exempt issues generally and thus make it more expensive for states and eries to borrow for other purposes. That contention is supported'in a re- port by the Congressional Budget Of- flee released April 8 by the House Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs. The study estimates that l0 billion dollars in nexv singleffamily bond issues would push up. interest rates on tax-exempt securities in gener- al by half a percentage point and rates on housing bonds by more than a full percentage point. Such worries are beginning to gener- ate concern in Congress. Some law- makers want to rescind the t,~x-free sta- tus of the bonds. Others propose to limit the amounts that can be sold and to give preference to first-time home buyers in mortgage loans. President Carter has called for legis- lation to restrict the benefits of this type of financing to low and moderate- income families or "other narrowly tar- geted public-policy objectives." Meauwhile, more and more cities plan to make use of this new tool while they have the freedom to do so. [2] 88 With lunch clubs fair game for the IRS, expense-account users are wondering Whether to drop memberships, A congressional goof in the tax-relief act of 1978 threatens hundreds of U.S. social and business-lunch clubs. The slip also is endangering a way of life for thousands of business and pro- fessional people who habitually take their lunches, and sometimes dinners, with clients at "the Club." In adopting a tax change proposed by President Carter, Congress acted to eliminate tax deductions for entertain- ment facilities used in business to pam- per customers~resort condominiums, hunting lodges, yachts and the like. As the bill emerged from the Senate, it also barred deduc- tions for dues and fees paid to social, athletic and sporting dubs, as well as country clubs. Even if a member used his club solely for business lunches and other .business enter- tainment, the dues were ~ ' not to be deductible from income received in 1979 or later, though the entertainment cost remained deductible. The Senate move aroused a storm among club groups, particularly coun- try clubs and the many downtmvn so- cial dubs that depend heavily on their exception would apply to all social, ath- letic and sporting chubs." Meanwhile, however, tax counselors are telling clients that their club dues will not be deductible on xeturns for 1979. Business and professional people who 'would not maiutain their dub memberships without the benefit of a tax deduction are wondering whether to drop out. If many do, hundreds of business-lunch clubs could go under. That may happen. Congress plans to restore the club-dues deduction retro- actively through 19.79, but many tax advisers want to "wait and see." There also is the question of how soon Congress will act. Tax advisers point out that the technical-corrections bill for the tax-reform act of 1976 did not become law until November, 1978. A bigger problem ~Perhaps is the po- sition of the Internal Revenue Service on this issue. While the offieial congres- sional summary of the 1978 act, just issued, says, "It is understood that the. exception was intended to apply to ali clubs," the IRS does not see it that way. Says an lBS official, "We have to force the tax law as it is, not as Congress proposes 'to write it sometime in the future." Thus, a taxpayer who queries the IRS on this point is told simply that social, athletic and sporting-dub dues are no longer de- ductible as a business-en- tertainment expense. Official instructions for ~ reporting 1979 income can.be. expected to offer no deduction for dues paid to social or business-lunch clubs. What will happen'to the business or professional person Who takes a deduc- tion for his 1979 dues? An IRS official expense-account trade. Under mounting pressure, Senate and House conferees, meeting to rec- oncile their differences, agreed to make an exception of dubs. Commit- tee summaries of the act stated that dues Would continue to be deductible for taxpayers who used their dubs pri- marily for business entertainment. Not until after the measure was passed was it discovered that the word- lng provided an exception for country clubs, neglected to take care of busi- ness-lunch clubs. The tax committees of Congress agree that the oversight should be remedied. In hot, the Technical Cor- rections Act of 1979, a bill go correct and darify the Revenue Act of 1978, already has started through Cougress. The official summary says, "The bill would modify the ... act so that the says, "He will have to pay interest on his underpayment of tax, and perhaps a penalty as xvell, if Congress fails to restore the deduction retroactive to 1979, or fails to take action in time." Where does that leave the expense- account user~or the corporation that routinely picks u15 the tab for its execu- tives' club dues? A closer look at some of the facts may suggest the answer: · Tax returns filed next year for 1979 will not be audited before July, 1980, and most selected for scrutiny won't be examined before 1981. n Tim bill restoring club-dues dedue-. tions retroactively is almost certain to become law by late 1980. The advice from one tax expert: "Don't drop >'our dub membership be- cause of the cloud over dues deduction. The odds on getting the deduction are BUDGET REPORT MARCtl 1979 )EPARTHENT 3UDGETEl) CURRENT £XP. Y-T-I) EXP. 2560 2; ALLO¥1ED ACTUAL ~2011 COUNCIL $ 10,450.OO 747.49 2,086.35 2,612.50 .1470 ~3012 HUMAN R I GHTS 360. OO i 94.41 90. OO .540O ~4013 HANAt;ER 85,180.OO 6,473.82 30,662.19 21,295.OO .3600 16014 ELECTIONS I ,080.00 5.42 7.86 270.00 ;0070 }7015 ASSESS I NG 33,055. O9 207.90 389.74 8,263.75 . Of 20 )9016 FINANCE 98,640.00 6',~38.02 23,720.23 24,660.00 .2400 11018 LEGAL 12,800.OO 1,133.34. . 3,200.O1 3,200.00 .2500 1118 PROSECUTING 11',O55.OO' 405.00 1,125.00 2,763.75 .1020 4031 POLICE 457,211.00 32,438.64 101,793.46 114,302.75 .2230 7032 FlEE 94,375,OO ~"1OO. 16 16,793~49 23,593.75 .1780. ~o~ ,~s,~:~',-,oN~ ~,~o.oo~.~.~,; ~,~8.~8",;~,;0."°/J''. .~ J 9933 PLANII i t~G 20,550.OO 438.30. 4,130.25 5,137.50 . 2009 I 1034 CIVIL DEFENSE 15,140,O0 '1,593.90 '1,6~'5:05 3,785.00 .11OO I ~O42 STREET 227,955.00 23,019.O4 68,689.93 56"988.75 .3013 I )743 SHOP & STORE 35,485,00 1,915.81 ' 6,166.27 8,871.25 .1740 i ;847 D!SEASE. D TREES · .22,440,00' 688.00 " 907.53 5,610.O0'' .O400'~:''''''' · · - : ':' ': ' ',...,., -<i~,984.00 .2070 ~O69 PARKS ~ 63,936,00 3,965.49 -13; 5.5i" .... I 081 C.E.T.A. -' . ~60.94 'i-.'i j:605'.77 .... - - 082 TEMPORARY LABOR 11,O50,00 189.15 ~;32.85 i' ' 'J 2,762.50 .0570 091 LIQUOR 165,905,00 20'268.60 38,~44.72 41,476.25 . .2329 " "1 D78 SEWER' 379,676,00 25,289.78 61,086.43 94,919.00 '-~'1'~10 '''l ,~~ ' '~'2~',',~;,.oo'"',~,om:~ "~",~i.'~,' ' ~,S~.7~ .,~o ! · I~E~vE'N'UI~ SHr'AR'INI~ ..... ~2,'314.OO i' 2,~5.63 ' ~2,510.6i ........ 1~,57-----J.5--'~' . .CE/4ETERY 5,335,00' 90.00 ' 190.OO I ,'333.75 '~,~'~-['[~ ~o,7~o.oo ~.~'~ · ,,~o.,~ - ,o,,87.~o · ,,,^T~_,~',~[,,~,~u,: ~,,,~,:~.oo · ' -.. .i.~,~8o.:~ ': ".'.¥~,~;s~.:oo.' . .,,:~,,.o --I ~ ~o,~'"",~'~,~'c',,"- ........ '2o,ooo. Oo -'" . : ..... , ' : "-----:. ,' ~ L~354. 462 n~ 154.727.66 1, o~' ~ z~ -'~ ~'~ ED ~\~ CREEK DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. · H. Dale Palmatier · Albert L, Lehman · James S. Russell · Jean Williams April 11, 1979 LAKE MINNETONKA OTA WATERSHED BOUNDARY / NOTICE OF MEETING OF BOARD OF MANAGERS Thursday, April 19, 19 79 7:30 P. M. Wayzata City Hall AGENDA ENCLOSED 2. 3. 4. AGENDA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District April 19, 1979 Call to order; present, absent, staff. Reading and approval of minutes of regular meeting, 3/15/79. Approval or amendment of April 19, 1979 agenda. Hearing of permit applications: .A. 77-38. Minnetonka Yacht Club, permit extension, riprap placement Tahoe Island, Carsons Bay on Lake Minnetonka - Deephaven. Be 77-112. Methodist Hospital, permit extension, parking lot construction, Minnehaha Creek floodplain - St. Louis Park. 78-127. T. Gasser, permit amendment to subdivision west of. 1-494 and north of Minnehaha Creek - Minnetonka. De 79-21. Centurion Company, grading/drainage plan for 32-acre subdivision, "Amhurst," north of Highway 7 and east of Edge- moor Drive - St. Louis Park and Hopkins. 79-23. J. Barron and Associates, grading/drainage plan for 18-lot subdivision, southwest short of Lake Virginia - Victoria. F. 79-24. Tonka Toys, application to continue discharging non- contact cooling water into Harrison Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Mound. G. 79-25. R. Johnson, 4805 Sunnyslope Road, retaining wall construction, Edina mill pond - Edina. 79-26. P. Klise, creation of wildlife pond near Tamarack Drive - Medina. 79-27. Lundgren Brothers Construction, final grading/ drainage plan, Ferndale North 4th Addition - Plymouth. J® 79-28. City of Tonka Bay, repair retaining wall, Manitou Channel - Tonka Bay. 79-29. L. Sawatzke, rip-rap placement, Morton Channel, Harrison Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Mound. 79-30. City of Minnetonka, underground utilities for "Pepperwood" Addition, Baker Road and Lake Street Extension - Minnetonka. Me 79-31. F. Poisson, driveway extension, culvert placement 4010 Bayside Road - Orono. qx7 e O® 79-32. S. Valek, grading/drainage plan for 8-lot subdivision at 4750 Tonkaview Lane - Orono. 79-33. City of Spring Park, replace existing storm sewer, Black Lake Road - Spring Park. 79-34. Pflaumwell Development partnership, grading/drainage plan for 3.4 acre townhouse and condominium development south shore of Long Lake - Spring Park. 79-35. R. Wostrel, filling on a single residential lot, 367 Ridgeview Drive - Wayzata. Re 79-36. Berry Island Company, grading/drainage plan proposed "Autumn Ridge" plat, Ranchview Lane south of County Road 15 - Minnetonka. 79-37. Berry Island Company, grading/drainage plan for proposed "Copper Ridge" plat, Sylvan Road and Cedar Lake Road - Minnetonka. Correspondence. Hearing of requests for petitions by public for action by the Watershed District. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney. A. Treasurer's Report - Mr. Russell. (1) 1978 Audit. (2) Administrative Fund Report. B. Engineer's Report - Mr. Holmquist. (1) Cooperative Agreement Projects Update. (2) Emergency Pumping - Parker's Lake to Gleason Lake, ~ i Plymouth. (3) Lake Minnetonka Water Quality Monitoring - Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Participation. (4) Flooding Complaint - Kendaco, Inc., St. Louis Park. (5) Request to Control Gleason Lake at Higher Level. (6) Permit No. 77-90 Amendment. (7) Twin City "Sole-Source Aquifer" Designation. C. Attorney's Report - Mr. Macomber. (1) Agreement with Hennepin County (2) Annual Report. Unfinished Business. (a) EPA Grant Fund Termination New Business. Adjournment. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE ~/ BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE ~ / March 15, 1979 ~ ~ ~ The regular meeting was called to order on March 15, 1979 by Chairman Cochran at 7:30 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Cochran, Russell, Lehman, and Williams Also present were board advisors Jandro and Macomber. Approval of Minutes. The minutes of the regular meeting of February 15, 1979 were reviewed. Following discussion it was moved by Russell, seconded by Williams, that the minutes be approved as published. Upon vote the motion carried. ~pproval of Permit Applications. The managers reviewed a written memorandum from the engineer summarizing the nature of the following applications, indicating that the applications comply with the applicable standards of the District, and recommending approval on the terms and conditions as set forth in his written memorandum. M. Grady, Permit Extension for Shoreline Work at 19995 Cottagewood Avenue, Carsons Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Deephaven; Application No. 77-145. City of Spring Park, Storm Sewer Construction, County Road No. 15, Bridge Over Seton Channel of Lake Minnetonka - Spring Park; Application No. 79-12. R. Radde, Sanitary Sewer for Two Lots Southwest of County Road No. 82 and Hillendale Street Intersection - Shorewood; Application No. 79-14. Red Owl Stores, Inc., Cooling Water Discharge into Minnehaha Creek by Lake Street N.E. and Blake Road - Hopkins; Application No. 79-19. W. Moe, Culvert Extension at 1220 Loma Linda Avenue - Orono; Application No. 79-22. Following discussion it was moved by Russell, seconded by Williams, that the above permits be approved and issued subject to all terms and conditions recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Page Two. March 15, 1979 Builtwell Construction, Grading/Drainage Plan for Two-Four Town- houses, Inglewood Avenue - St. Louis Park; Appl%cation No. 79-15. The engineer reviewed the application of Builtwell Construction for grading and drainage plan approval and recom- mended that the application be.approved subject to the erosion control measures recommended by the engineer. Following discussion it was moved by Lehraan, seconded by Russell, that the application be approved subject to the additional erosion control measures recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Korunsky, Krank, Erickson Architects, Inc., Grading/Drainage Plan for 7-Lot Subdivision at Pleasant View Road and County Road 17, S.W. Shore of Christmas Lake - Chanhassen; Application No. 79-16. The engineer reviewed the application for grading and drainage plan approval and recommended additional erosion control measures. Following discussion it was moved by Russell, seconded by Williams, that the application be approved subject to the additional erosion control measures recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. T. Wright's, Grading/Drainage Plan for Parking Lot Construction, 3310 South .Highwgy 101 - Minnetonka; Application No. 79-18. The engineer reviewed the application for grading and drainage plan approval in connection with parking lot construc- tion and recommended approval. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Cochran, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Ridgesquare Developers, Inc., Grading/Drainage Plan for Shopping Mall at 1940 Plymouth Road - Minnetonka; Application No. 79-20. The engineer reviewed the application for grading and drainage plan approval and recommended approval subject to the applicant dedicating permanent ponding areas. Peter Harrington appeared on behalf of the applicant and responded to questions from the managers. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the application be approved subject to the recommendations of the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Page Three March 15, 1979 Centurion Company, Grading/Drainage Plan for 32-acre Subdivision North of Highway 7 and East of Edgemoore Drive - St. Louis Park, Hopkins; .Application No. 79-21. The engineer reviewed the application of the Centurion Company for grading and drainage plan approval for Amherst. The engineer identified the ponding areas proposed by the applicant and the runoff calculations used by the applicant. Stanley Peterson of the Creekside Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of America appeared before the managers regarding the application. A1 Schendahl, of McCombs, Knutson & Associates, appeared on behalf of the applicant and explained the development proposal and drain- age plans to the managers. Following extensive discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the application be laid over pending submission of additional data to the engineer regarding: (1) highway drainage impacts; (2) storage capacity of the existing ponds, and (3) outflow data used for runoff calcula- tions. Upon vote the motion carried. Dock and Lift Service, Shoreline Rip-Rap at 3705 Northome Road on St. Louis Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Deephaven; Application No. 79-02. The engineer reviewed detailed plans submitted by the applicant pursuant to the action of the Board of Managers at the February meeting. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the detailed plans be approved. Upon vote the motion carried. Twin Cities Tree Trust. Kenneth Homan of the Twin Cities Tree Trust appeared before the managers and explained the availability of labor to the District for various creek improvement programs under this CETA-funded project. The managers requested Mr. Homan to pro- vide further details regarding this project to the District engineer. Treasurer's Report. The treasurer reviewed the monthly administrative fund report dated March 15, 1979, a copy of which is attached. Fol- lowing discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the report be approved and the bills paid as shown on the treasurer's report, but that the attorney's billing be paid only upon receipt of the original invoice in the accountant's office. Upon vote the motion carried. Page Four March 15, 1979 Creek Improvement Project. The engineer reported that the final site investigation at the Gray's Bay dam site for the new headwaters control struc- ture had been completed by the consultant. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the report be approved and accepted. Upon vote the motion carried. The engineer also delivered to the managers a revised rating curve for the proposed headwaters control structure. Following extensive review and discussion by the managers, the managers directed the engineer to further refine the rating curve and report back to the managers at the next regular meeting. Hydrologic Data Report, 1978. The engineer submitted the 1978 Hydrologic Data Report. Following discussion it was moved by Russell, seconded by Williams, that the report be approved and accepted by the managers, and that the engineer be directed to distribute the report to the mailing list recommended by him at the last regular meeting. Upon vote the motion carried. Lake Minnetonka Water Sampling. The engineer reported that the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the Freshwater Biological Laboratory had agreed in principle to contribute to the cost of additional proposed water quality sampling on Lake Minnetonka. Waterways Maintenance and Repair Fund Projects. The engineer delivered to the managers a summary of all projects authorized or under construction with assistance from the District under the Waterways Maintenance and Repair Fund. 1978 Annual Report. The attorney distributed a draft of the 1978 annual report, and a revision of the mailing list for the annual report for review and action by the managers at the next regular meeting. Page Five March 15, 1979 Adjournment. There being no further business to come before the meeting, Chairman Cochran declared the meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Albert L. Lehman Acting Secretary SOUTHWEST*SANITARY SEWER ADVISORY BOARD ~-' 20225 Cottagewood Road in Deephaven - '~'~EXCELSIOR, MINNESOTA 553 Area 1 -- Minnetonka 3 , .~/~ ~,~/1 · ~ i~~ Area 2 -- Eden Prairie Area 3 -- South of Minnesota River Area 4 -- Chanhassen and Chaska Area 5 -- Shorewood, Excelsior, Deephaven, Greenwood, Tonka Bay, Woodland Area 6 -- Wayzata, Orono. Long Lake, Medina Area 7 -- Victoria, Mound, St. Bonifacius. Minnetrista, Maple Plain, Independence, Spring Park MINUTES OF MEETING HELD JANUARY 18, 1979 Present: Oberhauser, Widmer, Boedecker, Britzius and Folland. The minutes of the October 19, 1978 meeting were approved as dis- tributed. It was reported that the balance in the bank was $61.35. Considering the negative balance of 40¢ in the postage petty cash fund, the net fund balance is $60.95. Report approved on motion by Widmer, seconded by Boedecker and passed unanimously. It was decided not to request any dues payments in 1979. The annual election of officers was held. For chairman, Boedecker nominated Oberhauser who was elected by unanimous vote. For vice Chairman, De Ghetto was nominated by Britzius and was elected unanimously. For Secretary-Treasurer, Britzius was nominated by Widmer and also was elected by unanimous vote. Folland, the ~CC contact presented a copy of the 1979 Budget and a projects status tabulation which were discussed. A discussion was held concerning items brought up at the monthly Waste Control Commission meetings as follows: SAC Charge Supreme Court Decision Long Lake - Orono Interceptor contract award. Force Main Acquisition at Prior Lake. 1978 Financial report of WCC. Special consideration was given to the status of the SW Area Study. It was decided to follow this item closely so there might be an SWAB input of opportune times. Widmer presented a resolution from the City of Spring Park to the WCC requesting acquisition of a lift station. After a discussion it was agreed that we write to the WCC supporting the Revolution requesting "the WCC to at least assume the maintenance and operating costs of the pumps in the lift station". The next meeting will be held on April 19 unless there is need for a special meeting. It was agreed that there will be no summer meeting in July. The new meeting place will be the law office at 1421 E WayZata Boulevard in Wayzata. Yours truly C W Britzius /Supplement to newsletter ICMA April 9, 1979 Vol. 60, No. 8 executive summary Donl. t count on revepge sharing. Municipal lobbyists are extremely concerned and advise local governments not to count on revenue sharing beyond fiscal year 1980. Among the political problems: state governments have been pressing the federal govern- ment to balance its budget. Congress is ready to pass the buck back to state and local governments by cutting revenue sharing funds, Proposals being considered for the 1979-80 fiscal year: ® cut out the allocation to state governments entirely; · reduce the total allocation by $2 billion; or · maintain the present level, Support for revenue sharing is the top priority of state and local government public interest groups. Revenue sharing will have a better chance for renewal if citizens become better informed about what it has funded. Congress now complains that constituents don't know it exists. And don't expect an increase.in federal aid. The Advisory Commission on Inter- governmental Relations has confirmed what local governments suspected. According to Administration estimates, federal aid to states and local governments will average only a 3~ increase for fiscal years 1979 and 1980. The average increase for the previous four years had been about ]6~. Looking at data from 1960 to projected figures in 1980, ACIR also found that federal aid grew at a rate slower than state/local revenue from their own sources. But you may have a chance to improve federal regulations. ~resident Carter has made regulatory reform a major'priority of his Administration. Most significant to local government managers is that new opportunities are opening up 'for analysis and reform of troublesome regulations. The President established a Regulatory Council in October 1978 with members from all major regulatory agencies. The Council will publish a semiannual calendar of major regulations~ estimating their economic impact~ and listing the date they will be issued. ICMA is now developing a plan to provide better feedback on proposed and existing'regulations to the federal government. You can help us help you. Are you willing to review and comment on a specific federal regulation or problem? If you can volunteer to review at least one regulation 'during the next year, contact Beth Kellar at ICMA and indicate any specific subject area~ such as housing or environment~ that interests you. Statutory .personnel requirements to be abolished. Congress has authorized the abolition of all statutory personnel requirements on October ]3, 1979, except for the following: · current programs requiring the Merit System Standards; · statutes that generally prohibit discrimination in employment; · the Davis-Bacon Act (requiring workers on construction projects to be paid at least minimum wage if the federal government is a party to the contract); and · political activity provisions applicable to state and local governments. All statutory requirements to be abolished on October 13, 1979 appeared in the Federal Regisbe~ on February 23, 1979. They also want your ideas on how to reduce personnel requirements tied to grants~ in-aid. The Office of Personnel Management is now identifying personnel requirements, both statutory and regulatory, attached to grants-in-aid. If you have suggestions on ways to reduce the personnel requirements t,ied to federal grants, now established by regulation, contact: Norman Beckman, Assistant Director for Intergovernmental Personnel Programs, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Washington, D.C.~ 20415. Look for tax exempt housing bond restrictions. Congress is expected to deba~e the use of tax exempt bonds by municipalities to finance home mortgage loans for middle- income homebuyers. The Carter Administration plans to propose legislation to limit the use of tax-exempt bonds to finance housing for only low- and moderate-income families. The problems are many. Treasury is losing revenue; interest rates might rise on other tax-exempt bonds, expecially those for multi-family, low-income housing; traditional home mortgage financing could be affected; and other federal homeownership subsidies could be distorted. Legislative proposals may put an income ceiling on eligible families; mortgage or purchase price ceilings; a requirement to choose between, tax exempt bond subsidy or mortgage interest deductions; targeting funds neighborhoods; or eliminating the exemption and expanding other subsidy programs. Early action~ please. The National League of Cities has testified before a Senate Finance Subcommittee on Revenue Sharing, Intergovernment Revenue Impact, and Economic Problems, urging early action on countercyclical assistance funding. NLC testified on two bills that would reauthorize the countercyclical assistance program, stressing early action so that cities that had budgeted the funds prior to the program's termination could use the funds during the current fiscal year. NLC also emphasized the economic hardship for cities if the program is terminated. Meeting the inflation problem. The White House has scheduled a series of state meetings across the country to discuss wage and price standards; federal and state regulatory policies; state procurement policies; federal, state, and local budgets; ways to improve productivity; and consumer participation in the Anti-Inflation Program. Local government officials are urged to attend. · April 12, Boston · April 12, Seattle · April 13, San Francisco · April 17, Denver More specific information on meeting agendas and locations m~.y be obtained from Marvin Madeson, Council on Wage and Price Stability, Room 428, Old Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C., 20500. International City Management Association, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036