2017-05-23 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2017 - 7:00 PM
REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call
vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence.
Opening meeting
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Approve agenda, with any amendments
*Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff,
recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who
wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of
concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence.
Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item
from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate.
Page
4. *Consent Agenda
*A. Approve payment of claims
*B. Approve Minutes: 5-09-17 Regular Meeting
1374-1407
1408-1410
*C. Approve Resolution for the City of Mound to enter into a Master Partnership 1411-1430
Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation to provide a framework 1412
for payment to each other for services rendered
*D. Approve Resolution approving Change Order No. 2 revising the completion dates for 1431-1434
the 2016 Lift Station Improvement Project — Lynwood Blvd LS D2, City Project 1432
No. PW -16-05
*E. Approve Resolution Approving Musical Concert Permit for private event on 1.435-1438
June 9, 2017 at 2015 Lakeside Lane 1437
Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
(Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.)
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
Public Hearing - Review of modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound 1439-1498
Harbor Project Area and the establishment of the Harrison Bay Senior Housing
TIF District
Requested Actions
a. Action on resolution approving the modification to the Mound Harbor 1442-1446
Project Area and establishment of the Harrison Bay Senior Housing TIF
District
b. Action on a resolution authorizing an interfund loan for advance of certain costs in 1495-1496
connection with Harrison Bay Senior Housing TIF District
Community Development Director Sarah Smith discussing an HKGI Staff Memorandum 1499
- 2040 Mound Comprehensive Plan Project Spring 2017 Community Engagement Summary
8. Action to approve $80,000 budget amendments for Swenson Park tennis court replacement 1500-1510
9. Emergency Operations Coordinator Stewart Simon presenting discussion on migration 1511-1518
from current Gov-Deliv notification system to CodeRED.
10. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments/reports from Council members
B. Reports:
C. Minutes: April 13, 2017 Parks and Open Spaces Commission 1519-1523
April 4, 2017 Planning Commission 1524-1529
D. Correspondence:
11. Adjourn
This is a preliminary agenda and subject to change. The Council will set a final agenda at the meeting. More current meeting
agendas maybe viewed at City Hall or at the City of Mound web site: wwii,. €; hi op`inouned. com.
COUNCIL BRIEFING
MAY 239 0(
Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!!
3 June 2017 - Mound Fire Dept Fish Fry
13 June 2017- 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
13 June 2017- 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
15 June 2017 - 7:00 PM - Music in the Park Series
27 June 2017 - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
27 June 2017- 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
11 July 2017 - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
11 July 2017- 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
21 - 22 July - Spirit of the Lakes Festival
25 July 2017 - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
25 July 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
28 July 2017 - 8: 00 AM - Wounded Warrior Soldier Ride
8 August 2017 - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
8 August 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
22 August 2017 - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required)
22 August 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting
City Offices Closed
29 May 2017 Memorial Day
City Official's Absences
Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Some votes require more than a simple
majority and Staff needs to plan accordingly.
Inquire in advance, please......
Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more
research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision-
making.
City of Mound Claims 5-23-17
YEAR
BATCH NAME
DOLLAR AMOUNT
2017
0117KENGRAV
$
2,292.50
2017
04MIDWESTSVC
$
3,357.50
2017
0417HOISINGT
$
5,737.77
2017
0417KENGRAV
$
3,429.47
2017
050917PAYREQ
$
68,656.24
2017
051117CTYMAN
$
101,332.51
2017
051517CTYMAN
$
35,854.93
2017
051717CTYMAN
$
6,839.07
2017
052317CITY
$
88,839.97
2017
052317HWS
$
122,793.54
-1374-
2017 052317CITY-2 21,665.30
I
�TOTAL CLAIMS 460,798.80
-1375-
•
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Batch Name 0117KENGRAV User Dollar Amt $2,292.50
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $2,292.50
$0.00 in Balance
Refer 117 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN
Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SVCS JAN 2017
Invoice 135831 2/17/2017
Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SVCS JAN 2017
Invoice 135831 2/17/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23367 PC16-41 6385 BAY RIDGE 6385 BAYRIDGE RD LEGAL SVCS JAN 2017
Invoice 135831 2/17/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23407 3040 HIGHLAND BLVD RET 3040 HIGHLAND BLVD LEGAL SVCS JAN
2017
Invoice 135831 2/17/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
Invoice 135831 2/17/2017
Cash Payment E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
Invoice 135831 2/17/2017
Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs
2016 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROD PW 16-05
LEGAL SVCS JAN 2017
Project PW1605
6077 ASPEN ABATEMENT ACTION- LEGAL
SVCS JAN 2017
CITY FRONTIER FRANCHISE MATTERS
LEGAL SVCS JAN 2017
05/17/17 2:45 PM
Page 1
$188.50
$6.50
$586.00
$43.50
$34.00
$31.50
$1,402.50
Invoice 135831 2/17/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Due 12/31/2015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,292.50
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
602 SEWER FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$2,258.50
$34.00
$2,292.50
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $2,292.50
Total $2,292.50
-1376-
CITY OF MOUND 05/17/178:00 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
$3,357.50
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,357.50
Total $3,357.50
-1377-
Batch Name
04MIDWESTSVC User Dollar Amt $3,357.50
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,357.50
$0.00 In Balance
Refer
4 MIDWEST SERVICES
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- MARCH 2017- REPAIR &
$680.00
SVC #512
Invoice 1449
4/7/2017 Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- MARCH 2017- TIRE
$637.50
MACHINE FITTING, #312, #202, #105
Invoice 1449
4/7/2017 Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- MARCH 2017 - #113, #312,
$680.00
WELL #3 GENERATOR
Invoice 1449
4/7/2017 Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- MARCH 2017 - 3 TRASH
$680.00
PUMPS, PELICAN SWEEPER DRAIN PLUGS,
#216 TOOLCAT, #117 HOT BOX TRAILER
Invoice 1449
4/7/2017 Project 17-5
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic MECHANIC SVCS- MARCH 2017 - #1504,
$680.00
#110 FELLING TRAILER, #304 TYMCO
SWEEPER, #202
Invoice 1449
4/7/2017 Project 17-5
Transaction Date
5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$3,357.50
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
602 SEWER
FUND $3,357.50
$3,357.50
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,357.50
Total $3,357.50
-1377-
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
05/16/17 4:01 PM
Page 1
Batch Name 0417HOISINGT User Dollar Amt $5,737.77
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $5,737.77
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 5 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, /
Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs
MISC PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2017
$520.00
Invoice 007-001-106 5/13/2017
Cash Payment E 10142400-300 Professional Srvs
MOUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040
$3,989.08
PLANNING SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 017-003-3 5/14/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23401 PC16-24 6639 BARTLETT D
6639 BARTLETT SERENITY HILLS
$47.50
DEVELOPMENT -PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23366 PC16-40 5488 TONKAWOO
5488 TONKAWOOD- C. VALERIUS VAR -
$307.47
PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23357 2544 COMMERCE BLVD VA
2544 COMMERCE CUP -PLANNING SVCS
$118.75
APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23373 PC17-03-04 1833 SHOREW
1833 SHOREWOOD LN WAIVER MINOR
$47.50
SUBDV-PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23377 PC -170-095468 LYNWOOD
5468 LYNWOOD CUP -PLANNING SVCS
$47.50
APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23358 PC16-14-18 2020 COMMER
2020 COMMERCE DEVELOP REVIEWS-
$212.47
PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23376 1821 RESTHAVEN EXP PE
1821 RESTHAVEN EXP PERMIT- MISC
$200.00
PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Cash Payment G 101-23408 PC17-10 2875 TUXEDO BLV
2875 TUXEDO BLVD REZONING APP-MISC
$247.50
PLANNING SVCS APRIL 2017
Invoice 015-015-25 5/13/2017
Transaction Date 5/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,737.77
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$5,737.77
$5,737.77
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $5,737.77
Tota l $5,737.77
i
CITY OF 1,
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Batch Name 0417KENGRAV User Dollar Amt $3,429.47
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,429.47
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 3 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs
ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I
PLANNING LEGAL SVCS FEB 2016
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-23360 SERENITY HILLS
SERENITY HILLS DEVELOP LEGAL SVCS
MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-23357 2544 COMMERCE BLVD VA 2544 COMMERCE BLVD PC 16-03 LEGAL
SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA
2016 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROD PW 16-05
LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Project PW1605
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-314 Legal P/W
PUBLIC WORKS LEGAL SERVICES MARCH
2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-49999-430 Miscellaneous
6077 ASPEN ABATEMENT ACTION- LEGAL
SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs
CITY FRONTIER FRANCHISE MATTERS
LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-304 Legal Fees
EXECUTIVE LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
G 101-23358 PC16-14-18 2020 COMMER
2020 COMMERCE BLVD- AEON DEVELOP
LEGAL SVCS MARCH 2017
Invoice 136975
4/27/2017
Transaction Date
5/16/2017 Due 12/31/2015
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$2,997.17
602 SEWER FUND
$432.30
$3,429.47
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,429.47
Total $3,429.47
-1379-
05/16/17 3:42 PM
Page 1
$72.50
$58.00
$943.67
$29.00
$432.30
$523.00
$927.50
$255.00
$145.00
$43.50
$3,429.47
Current Period: May 2017
1
Batch Name 050917PAYREQ User Dollar Amt $68,656.24
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $68,656.24
Refer 2 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA
$0.00 In Balance
PAY REQ #2 ISLAND PARK WATERMAIN
LOOP PROD PW 15-10- WORK COMPLETED
3-14-17 THRU 4-27-17 BARTLETT TO ISLAND
PARK
05/11/17 7:48 AM
Page 1
$68,656.24
Invoice 050917 4/27/2017
Transaction Date 5/10/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $68,656.24
Fund Summary
601 WATER FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$68,656.24
$68,656.24
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $68,656.24
Total $68,656.24
-1380-
CITY OF MOUND 05/10/17 3:44 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Batch Name
051117CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $101,332.51
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $101,332.51
$0.00 In Balance
Refer
7 ASPEN MILLS
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies 8 TS WHITE SHORT SLEEVE SHIRTS- W/ 16
$217.91
PATCHES SEWN ON- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 185207
8/15/2016
_
Transaction Date 5/10/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$217.91
Refer
1 JOSEPHSON, KELLY
Cash Payment
G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow REFUND CONSTRUCTION ESCROW- K.
$5,000.00
JOSEPHSON- 4948 EDGEWATER DR
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Transaction Date 5/10/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,000.00
Refer
3 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T
Cash Payment
E 101-41110-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$18.31
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2 9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 101-41310-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$261.59
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2 9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 101-41500-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$863.25
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2 9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 101-42110-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$0.00
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2 9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 101-42400-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$442.09
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2 9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$4,970.20
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$3,165.24
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$7,219.88
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 281-45210-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$91.56
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$3,531.47
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$3,531.47
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-151 Workers Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$2,014.24
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
-1381-
• • )'
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
05/10/17 3:44 PM
Page 2
Cash Payment
E 675-49425-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$0.00
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2 9/28/2016
Cash Payment
E 101-42115-151 Worker s Comp Insuranc 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 WORKERS COMP
$49.70
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117-2
9/28/2016
Transaction Date 5/10/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$26,159.00
Refer
2 LEAGUE MN CITIES INSURANCE T
Cash Payment
E 101-41110-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAR
$3,270.15
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41310-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$116.64
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41500-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$819.06
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41600-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$50.75
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins
IST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$395.56
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-42110-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$870.06
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-42115-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$162.61
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-42400-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$998.78
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-361 General Liability Ins
IST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$2,489.31
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$2,837.49
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$5,841.07
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$110.11
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 285-46388-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$426.49
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$4,131.60
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-361 General Liability Ins
1 ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$9,235.35
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
-1382-
CITY OF MOUND 05/10/17 3:44 PM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$9,301.00
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$1,308.69
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-361 General Liability Ins
1 ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017
$6,020.00
CENTENNIAL RENTAL LIAB INS 2-1-17 THRU
2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 281-45210-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 VILLA
$4,796.00
DOCKS PIO INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 285-46388-361 General Liability Ins
1 ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 DECK 1 &
$6,310.00
BATHROOMS LIAB INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 285-46388-361 General Liability Ins
1 ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GREENWAY
$5,990.00
& LOST LAKE LIAB INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-361 General Liability Ins
LIQUOR LIABILITY 2017 INS COVERAGE 2-1-
$3,630.00
17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-49999-361 General Liability Ins
1ST & 2ND INSTALLMENT 2017 GEN LIAB
$326.28
INS 2-1-17 THRU 2-1-18
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Transaction Date
5/10/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$69,437.00
Refer
4 MCNIEL, MATTHEW
Cash Payment
R 281-45210-34725 Dock Permits
REFUND DREAMWOOD DOCK FEE LICENSE
$332.50
APP M. MCNIEL- EXCELSIOR MN
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Transaction Date
5/10/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$332.50
Refer
5 NOBS, BRYAN
Cash Payment
G 281-22000 Deposits
REFUND LOST LAKE DOCK KEY DEPOSIT-
$50.00
B.NOBS
Invoice 051117
5/8/2017
Transaction Date
5/10/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$50.00
Refer
9 NORLANDER, JILL
Cash Payment
E 101-42400-434 Conference & Training
REIMBURSE MILEAGE MUNICIPALS
$18.30
TRAINING- EAGAN -J. NORLANDER & C.
ROBERTS 5-4-17
Invoice 051117
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41500-434 Conference & Training
REIMBURSE MILEAGE MUNICIPALS
$18.30
TRAINING- EAGAN -J. NORLANDER & C.
ROBERTS 5-4-17
Invoice 051117
5/10/2017
Transaction Date
5/10/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$36.60
Refer
8 SIMON, STEWART
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training
REIMBURSE PARKING -PW INFASTRUCTURE
$16.00
EMERGENCY MGMT TRAINING- ST. PAUL -
S. SIMON 5-8-17
Invoice 051117
5/9/2017
Transaction Date
5/10/2017
Wells Fv-1383- 10100 Total
$16.00
Current Period: May 2017
05/10/175:44PN
Page 4
Fund Summary
*101.332.51
Pre -Written Checks $lOO
Checks mbeGenerated bythe Computer $101.332.51
Total $101.332.51
10OnWells Fargo
101GENERxLFUND
p3455e.06
222AREA FIRE SERVICES
o13.278.88
281COMMONS DOCKS FUND
$5.380.17
o0oMOUND HRA
$12.726.49
OO1WATER FUND
$7.063.07
OO2SEWER FUND
$12.782.82
OV9MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$14.8*524
Or5STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
$0.00
*101.332.51
Pre -Written Checks $lOO
Checks mbeGenerated bythe Computer $101.332.51
Total $101.332.51
CITY OF MOUND 05/15/1710:49 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$31,831.00
Refer
3 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$122.93
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$41.78
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$299.13
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$249.66
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$242.31
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$242.31
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$432.02
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$144.02
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$72.00
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$72.00
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41500-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -4-30-17- TO 5-29-17
$0.00
Invoice 051517
4/30/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,918.16
Refer
2 WAYZATA, CITY OF
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-500 Capital Outlay FA 2017 FORD F350 SUPER CAB PICKUP-
$2,105.77
PARKS DEPT #317 MOTOR VEHICLE SALES
TAX, REGISTRATION & TITLE FILING FEES
Invoice 051517
5/15/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,105.77
-1385-
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Fund Summary
1010OWells Fargo
1O1GENERAL FUND
$3487803
222AREA FIRE SERVICES
$144.02
501 WATER FUND
$24231
5O2SEWER FUND
9291.44
0O9MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$299.13
$35.854,9:
Pre -Written Checks MOO
Checks mboGenerated uythe Computer $35.854.03
05/15/1710:49AN
Page 2
CITY OF MOUND 05/17/17 2:13 PM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Batch Name 051717CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $6,839.07
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $6,839.07
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 20 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS (FIRE)
-
Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair
FUEL SENDER- FIREBOAT #28
$35.49
Invoice 6974-291668 4/8/2017
Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
ADDITIVE FOR MOTOR FUEL FOR POWER
$33.09
TOOLS- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 6974-293123 5/1/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$68.58
Refer � 22 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (PAV9
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
OIL & FUEL FILTERS, FUEL CAP #1504
$55.07
PARKS
Invoice 6974-290976 3/30/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
WIPER BLADES- #1504 PARKS
$33.10
Invoice 6974-290999 3/30/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
WIPER BLADES- STOCK
$33.10
Invoice 6974-290999 3/30/2017
Project 17-3
Gash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
PIN & CABLE ASSEMBLY TRAILER #110
$6.94
Invoice 6974-291001 3/30/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
TOWING BREAKAWAY, ID BAR LAMP
$39.32
TRAILER #110
Invoice 6974-291029 3/30/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SWITCH FORD- PUB WKS- RETURN
$4.60
CONTOUR GRIP BLACK
Invoice 6974-291065 3/31/2017
Project 17 3
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SUPPLIES PUB WKS
$11.95
Invoice 6974-291061 3/31/2017
Project 17-3
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$184.08
Refer 23 CARQUEST OF NAVARRE (P/IA
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
5 GAL DIESEL CAN, GAS CAN 1 & 2 PLUS
$89.22
CARE- PARKS
Invoice 6974-291421 4/5/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-291545 4/6/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-291616 4/7/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-291770 4/11/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-291774 4/11/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-291794 4/11/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-291808 4/11/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 6974-291824 4/11/2017
72" ZIP CABLE $13.46
TRAILER BALL #1504 PARKS $12.34
RETURN CREDIT TRAILER BALL EXCHANGE -$1.90
MINI BULB -LONG LIFE- PUB WKS $3.49
SEAL, BEARING, 50 PVC SPLIT LOOM, BOAT $26.06
TRAILER PARKS
BEARING- BOAT TRAILER- PARKS $16.48
DEEP CYCLE OIL- MARINE BATTERY- $69.00
PARKS BOAT
i
CITY OF MOUND 05/17/17 2:13 PM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
1L"
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
OIL FILTER- PARKS
$2.87
Invoice 6974-291931 4/13/2017
Invoice 142672
4/10/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
OIL FILTER 2011 FORD F550 #210 PARKS
$10.50
Invoice 6974-291959 4/13/2017
$21.89
Refer
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
LECTRA MOTIVE CLEANER- SEWER DEPT
$14.70
Invoice 6974-292813 4/26/2017
E 602-49450-322 Postage
SHIPPING CHARGE- RETURN PLANET
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$256.22
Refer 25 MINNESOTA WASTEWATER OPER
Invoice 142522
Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training
MN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOC
$250.00
Cash Payment
CONF JULY 26-28 REGISTRATION- R. PRICH
CLEANING WIPES- VINYL PROTECTANT,
Invoice 051717 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 051717 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training
Invoice 051717 5/17/2017
MN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOC $250.00
CONF JULY 26-28 REGISTRATION- R.
HANSON
MN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOC $250.00
CONF JULY 26-28 REGISTRATION- S.
KIVISTO
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $750.00
Refer 19 NAPA AUTO PARTS -SPRING PAR
Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair ADAPTER FOR AIR HOSE REPAIR IN $4.84
MAINTENANCE BAY
Invoice 017350 4/26/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4.84
Refer 21 TRUE VALUE MOUND (FIRE)
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
11 KEYS- FIRE DEPT
$21.89
Invoice 142672
4/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$21.89
Refer
24 TRUE VALUE, MOUND (PW PKS)
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-322 Postage
SHIPPING CHARGE- RETURN PLANET
$24.21
HEADSETS
Invoice 142522
4/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies
CLEANING WIPES- VINYL PROTECTANT,
$30.91
BOWL CLEANER- SCREWS, DEPOT BLDG
Invoice 142525
4/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SAFE RED MARK PAINT
$12.58
Invoice 142549
4/5/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies
PINK & RED FLUORESCENT SPRAY PAINT
$16.17
Invoice 142560
4/5/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
LEMON AMONIA- WELL HOUSE #3
$2.69
Invoice 142572
4/6/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
DRILL BITS- STREETS
$43.15
Invoice 142603
4/7/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
QUICK LINKS- PUB WKS
$17.96
Invoice 142624
4/7/2017
Project 17-3
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
8 OZ PSTL OILER 6" SPOUT
$11.69
Invoice 142675
4/10/2017
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
05/17/17 2:13 PM
Page 3
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 2" SCREW BIT, 3 X 6 MENDING PLATE- $11.35
SCREWS, NUTS, BOLTS- SHOP WATER
TANK REPAIR
Invoice 142714 4/12/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142722 4/12/2017
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142750 4/13/2017
Cash Payment E222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 142762 4/14/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142765
4/14/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142768
4/14/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142769
4/14/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142806
4/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142846 4/18/2017
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142884 4/20/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies
Invoice 142917 4/21/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
Invoice 142918 4/21/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-322 Postage
Invoice 142999 4/25/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
ADAPTERS, CLEANOUT & PLUG - SHOP $8.61
WATER TANK REPAIR
100 OZ ROOF CEMENT, 1/2" COMB $15.08
WRENCH -STREETS
10.5 WATT LED BULB- FIRE DEPT $5.39
2" FLEXIBLE DRAIN COUPLING, TUBULAR $11.68
DRAIN CONNECTOR- PARKS WATER TANK
RETURN 2" FLEXIBLE DRAIN COUPLING- -$5.84
PARKS
HOSE HANGER & HOSE KIT- PARKS WATER $19.78
TANK
PLAS ELECT TAPE, GORILLA TAPE, 8 PK AA $32.36
ALKALINE BATTERIES- PUB WKS
Project 17-3
SCREWS, HUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS- PARKS $0.54
SHOP
16T BOW RAKE- STREETS DEPT $19.98
TOILET BOWL RING REMOVER, UNIVERSAL $22.48
PIN PADLOCK- DEPOT BLDG
QUICK LINKS -3, 100 PK CABLE TIES- PUB $75.12
WKS ,
FED EX SHIPPING CHARGE- MN DEPT OF $47.54
HEALTH- WATER DEPT
GALVANIZED PIPING, 8 OZ TEFLON/PASTE, $88.61
COUPLING- SEWER DEPT
Invoice 143031
4/26/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms
MENS LINED COW GLOVES- PARKS
$17.05
Invoice 143060
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 1 01-45200-21 0 Operating Supplies
KEYS- 4 QTY- PARKS
$7.96
Invoice 143089
4/28/2017
Cash Payment
E 281-45210-210 Operating Supplies
STAKES- DOCKS MARKING
$21.38
Invoice 143102
4/28/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
TO RECONCILE CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
-$5.01
Invoice 04302017 4/30/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$553.46
Refer
18 WINKLER, TODD
_
-1389-
Eejfil•i • 111
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
�a
05/17/17 2:13 PM
Page 4
Cash Payment G 101-26066 TEMP CERT. OF OCCUPAN REFUND ESCROW BALANCE 5001 $5,000.00
WILSHIRE BLVD- T. WINKLER #2009-00666
Invoice 052317 5/17/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00
Fund Summary
101 GENERAL FUND
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
10100 Wells Fargo
$5,572.93
$100.70
$21.38
$74.50
$1.069.56
$6,839.07
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,839.07
Total $6,839.07
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:31 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Batch Name 052317CITY User Dollar Amt $88,839.97
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $88,839.97
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 24 ASPEN EQUIPMENT
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SEAL KITS- STREETS
$221.31
Invoice 10176833 5/11/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$221.31
Refer
22 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG
_
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 3-19-17 TO 4-19-17
$236.28
Invoice 052317
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 3-19-17 TO 4-19-17
$236.28
Invoice 052317
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 3-19-17 TO 4-19-17
$439.32
Invoice 052317
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 3-19-17 TO 4-19-17
$494.74
Invoice 052317
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 3-19-17 TO 4-19-17
$481.33
Invoice 052317
5/9/2017
Project 17-3
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 3-19-17 TO 4-19-17
$66.89
Invoice 052317
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities
GAS SVC 3-19-17 TO 4-19-17 DEPOT BLDG
$127.58
Invoice 052317
5/9/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2,082.42
Refer
1 FIRSTLAB
_
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-305 Medical Services
DOT PRE-EMPLOYMENT DRUG SCREEN- R.
$50.95
LARSON
Invoice FL00173415 5/5/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-305 Medical Services
DOT RANDOM DRUG SCREEN
$50.95
Invoice FL00173415 5/5/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$101.90
Refer
23 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
WATER METER SUPPLIES- CUR BOXES,
$671.45
STATIONARY RODS
Invoice H161841
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
WATER METER PARTS- COUPLING, FLARE
$384.18
TEE, COPPER TUBING
Invoice H162318
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies
WATER METER FLEX COUPLING
$70.98
Invoice H162521
5/9/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,126.61
Refer
2 HEALTH PARTNERS CLINICS
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-305 Medical Services
DOT EXAM & PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
$83.00
EXAM- R. LARSON
Invoice 900032661 5/1/2017
Cash Payment E 602-49450-305 Medical Services
DOT EXAM & PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL $83.00
EXAM- R. LARSON
Invoice 900032661 5/1/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017 Wells Fa_1 1_ 10100 Total $166.00
u�1ml711��31mw
CITY OF �����
Page
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Refer
3HENNEPYNCOUNTY 8VF0RM\TIO
_
/Ca,+oPaymom,
E5O2-4945U-321Telephone, Cells, &Rodi
PIN RADIO LEASE &ADM|N|STR/TlONFEE '
$152,48
AFY\R|L2O17
Invoice 1000093400 5/2/2017
Project 17-3
Cash Payment
E222-4220V'321Telephone, Cells, &Radi
FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE &
$2.021.71
ADMINISTRATION FEE ' APRIL 2O17
Invoice 1000093387 5/2/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$2.774.19
Refer
27HENmEP0vCOUNTY RECORDER
_
Cash Payment
E1O149988-43UMiscellaneous
CONSENT & WAIVER AGREEMENT
$82.00
ABSTRACT &TORnENSRECORDING -HEwN
CTY'6ur7ASPEN RDABATEMENT
Invoice 514-1533231 4/30/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$92.00
Refer
5JESSENPRESS INCORPORATED
_
Cash Payment �E1O141110-35OPrinting
PRINT, MAIL -CITY CONTACT NEWS 8PG
$1.470.00
MAY, JUNE, JULY 2017—h.2OVCOPIES
Invoice 675701
4/28/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1.470.00
Refer
6 KLM ENGINEERING, 0VCORPORAT_
Cash Payment
y
E1O�'431VO-5OO�api�|�uUay FA
REMOVE
$0277OO
. �
PIPE & REINSTALL GG -12|N WELL #8
EVERGREEN TOWER
Invoice 6336
4/27/2017 PO 24830
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
*8.277.00
Refer
7 LOFFLER COMPANIES, OR,0R_
Cash Payment
E1O14193U'202Duplicating and copying
COPY ROOM KON|C8CO52-COLOR
$84,11
OVERAGE 'u-14-17THRU5-1547
Invoice 2513120
5/2/2017
Cash Payment
E1V14183O-2O2Duplicating and copying
COPY ROOM KON|CACO52-88VV
$160.31
OVERAGE '4'14-17THRU5'1V-17
Invoice 2513120
5/2/2017
Cash Payment
EOO24g45O-2O2Duplicating and copying
KON|CAMINOLTA B2OOPIN COPIER
$3,04
OVERAGE CMG41O-17THRU5-V'17
Invoice 2511010
5/1/2017
Project 17-3
Transaction Date
5/15/3017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$247.46
Refer
26MCF[N
_
Cash Payment
E1O�-^150V488Duenond�ubaohFuinno
2V17MUNICIPAL CLERKS &FINANCE
$40.00
'
OFFICERS MEMasRGH|pouEG-n.mELcY
Invoice 052317
5/15/2017
Cash Payment
E1O1415O0-438Dues and Subscriptions
2O17MUNICIPAL CLERKS &FINANCE
$40.00
OFFICERS MEMBERSHIP DUES- C.
PAUGC*s
Invoice 052317
5/15/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Tota!
$80,00
Refer
8MEDIA COM
_
Cash Payment
E101'4211V-321Telephone, Cells, &Rodi
ORONOPDINTERNET SVC 45-1O'17TMRUO'
$95.90
15-17
Invoice 052317
5/6/2017
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:31 AM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Invoice 0001068196 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$61,051.73
Refer
28 MINNESOTA CITY/COUNTY MANA
Cash Payment
E 101-41500-433 Dues and Subscriptions
ASSOC OF PUB MGMT PROFESSIONALS
$30.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES 2017 K. KELLY
Invoice 052317
5/15/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$30.00
Refer
17 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT-(SCHAR
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
OIL FILTERS, SPARK PLUGS- PARKS
$18.48
Invoice P53436
3/7/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$18.48
Refer
10 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-470 Water Samples
MONTHLY COLIFORM WATER TESTS
$25.00
Invoice 861344
5/1/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$25.00
Refer
11 MINUTEMAN PRESS
_
Cash Payment
E 101-42400-210 Operating Supplies
250 DIGITAL BUSINESS CARDS- S. SIMON
$12.18
Invoice 19154
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies
250 DIGITAL BUSINESS CARDS- S. SIMON
$12.17
Invoice 19154
5/8/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$24.35
Refer
12 MULCH STORE, THE
_
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
CONTRACTOR 50/50 BLEND MULCH- PARKS
$32.00
Invoice 8194369
4/20/2016
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$32.00
Refer
13 NORTHLAND EXCAVATING, LLC
_
_
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic
WATERMAIN BREAK REPAIR- 5-5-17 @2590
$1,920.00
COMMERCE- GILLESPIE CTR
Invoice 052317
5/15/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,920.00
Refer X25
OFFICE DEPOT
_
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies
HIGHLIGHTERS, COPY PAPER -CITY HALL
$123.98
Invoice 925988580001
5/8/2017 PO 24816
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies
PLANTRONICS HEADSET BATTERY
$36.95
Invoice 925988431001
5/8/2017 PO 24816
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$160.93
Refer
14 OPUS 21 MGMT SOLUTIONS
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-307 Admin/Finance/Compute
APRIL 2017 -CIS DATA HOSTING,
$1,865.45
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 170440
5/9/2017
-1393-
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:31 AM
Page 4
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-322 Postage
APRIL 2017- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
$307.03
Invoice 170440
5/9/2017
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-322 Postage
APRIL 2017- UTILITY BILLING POSTAGE
$307.03
Invoice 170440
5/912017
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-307 Admin/Finance/Compute
APRIL 2017 -CIS DATA HOSTING,
$1,865.45
PROTECTION- 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
PRODUCTION, BILLING, CALL CTR SUPPORT
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Invoice 170440
5/9/2017
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$4,344.96
Refer
15 SIMPLEX GRINNELL
Cash Payment
Cash Payment
E 285-46388-440 Other Contractual Servic
PARKING DECK FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
$594.00
WANTED AD 4-13-17, 4-20-17, 4-27-17
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-440 Other Contractual Servic
PARKS GARAGE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
$215.00
TEST & INSPECT 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41930-440 Other Contractual Servic
CITY HALL FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
$966.00
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-440 Other Contractual Servic
FIRE DEPT FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
$966.00
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM, KITCHEN HOOD
TEST & INSPECTION 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic
HWS FIRE EXTINGUISHER, SPRINKLER &
$499.00
FIRE ALARM TEST & INSPECTION 6-1-17
THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-41910-440 Other Contractual Servic
CENTENNIAL BLDG FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
$821.00
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic
PUB WKS BLDG FIRE EXTINGUISHER,
$832.00
SPRINKLER & FIRE ALARM TEST &
INSPECTION 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Project 17-3
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic
PUB WKS BLDG BACK FLOW WYWTEM
$145.00
PROTECTION- 6-1-17 THRU 5-31-18
Invoice 79381754 5/1/2017
Project 17-3
Transaction Date
5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$5,038.00
Refer
16 SOUTHWEST NEWS MEDIA
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-328 Employment Advertising
PUBLIC WORKS- UTILITY MTCE FT HELP
$132.00
WANTED AD 4-13-17, 4-20-17, 4-27-17
Invoice 1941774 4/27/2017
Cash Payment E 601-49400-328 Employment Advertising PUBLIC WORKS- UTILITY MTCE FT HELP $132.00
WANTED AD 4-13-17, 4-20-17, 4-27-17
Invoice 1941774 4/27/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $264.00
Refer 18 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY
Cash Payment G 101-23371 TRIDENT HOUSING TIF ES LEGAL MTCE- TIF DISTRIICT PUBLIC $123.36
HEARING NOTICE- TRIDENT
DEVELOPMENT- 5-06-17
Invoice 487243 5/6/2017 -1394-
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:31 AM
Page 5
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$123.36
Refer 19 TONKA PLUMBING HEATING & CL
Cash Payment E 101-45200-440 Other Contractual Servic FURNISH & INSTALL WILKINS 1" PRESSURE
$548.00
VACUUM BREAKER - IRRIGATION SYSTEM -
PARKS BLDG
Invoice 9248 5/3/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$548.00
Refer 20XCEL ENERGY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities
ELECTRIC SVC 4-03-17 THRU 5-02-17 CITY
$442.34
OWNED STREET LIGHTS
Invoice 544979918 5/3/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$442.34
Refer 21 ZIEGLER, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
WATER BOTTLE, BRACKET FOR WELL #8
$82.03
GENERATOR
Invoice 052317 4/24/2017
Transaction Date 5/15/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$82.03
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$13,160.01
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$3,823.99
285 MOUND HRA
$594.00
601 WATER FUND
$5,541.12
602 SEWER FUND
$65,154.96
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
$565.89
$88,839.97
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $88,839.97
Total $88,839.97
-1395-
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:19 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Batch Name 052317HWS User Dollar Amt $122,793.54
$563.80
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $122,793.54
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale FREIGHT
$0.00 In Balance
Invoice 58825000 5/12/2017
Refer 1 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$93.90
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$114.40
Invoice 1927712603 5/6/2017
Invoice 58825100 5/12/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$42.88
Invoice 1971712909 5/9/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100
Total $698.10
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$87.50
Invoice 1911713302 5/13/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
ICE
$82.12
Invoice 1911713302 5/13/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
ICE
$1.00
Invoice 1927712603 5/6/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Due 12/31/2014
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$327.90
Refer 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
_
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$539.00
Invoice 3176246 5/4/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$283.35
Invoice 3177834 5/11/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
-$42.48
Invoice 383940 5/8/2017
Transaction Date 5117/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$779.87
Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies
SUPPLIES, BAGS
$91.50
Invoice 95786500 5/12/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$91.50
Refer 36 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$4,096.35
Invoice 58879500 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$44.95
Invoice 58879500 5/17/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,141.30
Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
$563.80
Invoice 58825000 5/12/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale FREIGHT
$10.25
Invoice 58825000 5/12/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$93.90
Invoice 58825100 5/12/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale FREIGHT
$6.15
Invoice 58825100 5/12/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$24.00
Invoice 95806500 5/17/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100
Total $698.10
Refer 5 BELLBOY CORPORATION
-1396-
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/1711:19 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$611.95
Invoice 58777000 5/10/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$12.75
Invoice 58777000 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$624.70
Refer 7 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$77.20
Invoice 357023 5/3/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
-$240.00
Invoice 357024 5/5/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
-$162.80
Refer 37 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$47.60
Invoice 359537 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$942.00
Invoice 359538 5/17/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$989.60
Refer 6 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
$45.95
Invoice 358245 5/10/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$527.20
Invoice 358246 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$573.15
Refer - 38 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE
_
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$6,970.90
Invoice 1090710305 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$83.00
Invoice 1090710306 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$123.00
Invoice 1090710307 5/17/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$7,176.90
Refer 8 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$95.00
Invoice 1090707285 5/10/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$5,828.10
Invoice 1090707283 5/10/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$123.00
Invoice 1090707284 5/10/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,830.74
Invoice 1090704307 5/3/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$8,876.84
Refer 9 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE
Cash Payment E 60949750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$88.00
Invoice 1080630160 5/4/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$957.22
Invoice 1080630159 5/4/2017
-1397-
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:19 AM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$26.71
Invoice 1080630161 5/4/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$1,071.93
Refer 10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE
_
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$112.30
Invoice 1080633314 5/11/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,845.76
Invoice 1080633223 5/11/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$387.14
Invoice 1080629609 5/3/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,328.00
Invoice 1080632749 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4,673.20
Refer 39 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,084.79
Invoice 1080636297 5/18/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$3,010.18
Invoice 1080636686 5/18/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4,094.97
11 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO.
_Refer
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$226.00
Invoice 67-1925 5/11/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$226.00
Refer 41 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST
Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COKE PRODUCTS- MIX
$323.64
Invoice 3601203671 5/16/2017
Transaction Date 5/18/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$323.64
Refer 40C -Y PUBLICATIONS
_
Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising
ADVERTISING-
HWS -CATHOLIC YEARBOOK-
$199.00
DIRECT MAILED ANNUALLY- 2017 EDITION
Invoice 54659 5/5/2017
Transaction Date 5/18/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$199.00
Refer 12 DAHLHE/MER BEVERAGE LLC
_
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$2,784.50
Invoice 1279273 5/3/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$310.00
Invoice 147104 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$3,094.50
Refer 13 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$1,508.80
Invoice 893784 5/11/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$765.00
Invoice 892507 5/4/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$2,273.80
Refer 14 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:19 AM
Page 4
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 5715259 5/3/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 5715257 5/3/2017
BEER
$21.99
LIQUOR $3,801.44
-1399-
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$93.80
Invoice 2669922 5/3/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
$15.49
Invoice 2669922
5/3/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$4,363.55
Invoice 2669921
5/3/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4,472.84
Refer
15 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$43.00
Invoice 2669954
5/10/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$38.80
Invoice 2669954
5/10/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$7,619.40
Invoice 2669953
5/10/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$7,701.20
Refer
42 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$20.00
Invoice 2669982
5/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$38.80
Invoice 2669982
5/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$4,822.20
Invoice 2669981
5/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER CREDIT
-$9.60
Invoice 2657752
5/15/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4,871.40
Refer
16 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$165.07
Invoice 5723093
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$8,749.50
Invoice 5723093
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,226.85
Invoice 5723094
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$40.30
Invoice 5723094
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$179.50
Invoice 2721965
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$380.20
Invoice 2721966
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$902.50
Invoice 2721968
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$497.10
Invoice 2721969
5/11/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$12,141.02
Refer
17 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
Invoice 5715259 5/3/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Invoice 5715257 5/3/2017
BEER
$21.99
LIQUOR $3,801.44
-1399-
o5nm1r11:19xs
����������
Page
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment E609-49750-253Wine For Resale
WINE
$3.045.90
Invoice 5715258 5/3/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
%8.889.33
Refer 18JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_
Cash Payment E0US~4975O'252Beer For Resale
BEER
*75.80
Invoice 5720684 5/102017
Cash Payment E8O84B750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$9.007.10
Invoice 5720682 5/102017
Cash Payment EOO8-^g75O'253Wine For Resale
WINE
$467.90
Invoice 5720683 5/10/2017
Cash Payment EO0349750-253Wine For Resale
WINE
*322.50
Invoice 5716594 5/4/2017
Cash Payment EOV8-49750-253Wine For Resale
WINE
*52.00
Invoice 5710686 4/27/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$4.525.30
Refer 43JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR
_
Cash Payment E0Og-49r50-252Beer For Resale
BEER
$38.00
Invoice 5720526 5/17/2817
Cash Payment EO08'4975U-251Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$4.357.15
Invoice 5726521 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E60g48750-253Wine For Resale
WINE
$3.828.05
Invoice 5726522 5/1712017
Cash Payment EOU84975U'25JWine For Resale
VV/NE
$802.90
Invoice 5726525 5/17/2017
Cash Payment EO0S-o9750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
*528.50
Invoice 5726523 5/17/2017
Cash Payment EOU84gr50'254Soft Drinks/Mix For Roua MIX
$111.00
Invoice 5726524 5/17/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$9.45820
Refer 19MARGRONGKOSLLN0WINE IMP
_
Cash Payment EOOS4875O-253Wine For Resale
WINE
$369,00
Invoice 20021205 5/10/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$7.50
Invoice 20021205 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo
10100 Total
$370.50
Refer 44MARLIN GTRUCKING DELIVERY
_
Cash Payment EbO8-*9750-2O5Freight
DELIVERY 05-01-17
%63.80
Invoice 38131 5/1/2017
Cash Payment E0V9-4975O-2ObFreight
DELIVERY 05-04-17
$243.60
Invoice 33147 5w/2017
Cash Payment EOO94975O-2O5Freight
DELIVERY 05-08-17
%29.00
Invoice 33155 5/8/2017
Cash Payment E0n8'49750-205Freight
DELIVERY 05-11-17
$278.40
Invoice 33170 5/11/2017
Transaction Date 5/18/2017
Wells Fargo
10180 Total
$614.80
Refer 20MILLNBRHERITAGE VINEYARD &
_
Cash Payment EOO948750-253Wine For Resale
VV}NE*100.O0
-i���-
Invoice 25517-1 5/5/2017
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:19 AM
Page 6
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $108.00
Refer 21 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals
JUNE 2017 COMMON AREA MICE &
$685.78
Invoice 2160303
5/3/2017
INSURANCE HWS
Invoice 052317
6/1/2017
WINE
$1,053.25
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$685.78
Refer
45 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
_
Invoice 2160305
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,410.00
Invoice 8590019
5/15/2017
Total $3,394.05
Refer
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$17.50
Invoice 8590019
5/15/2017
$682.25
Invoice 2163942
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
-$224.00
Invoice 8589692
5/11/2017
$321.50
Invoice 2163941
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT CREDIT
-$1.25
Invoice 8589692
5/11/2017
$89.00
Invoice 2163943
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,202.25
�n
22 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA
Total $1,092.75
Refer
_Refer
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,182.73
Invoice 8589142
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$12.50
Invoice 8589142
5/8/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,195.23
Refer 46 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
Invoice 2167769 5/17/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
Invoice 2167768 5/17/2017
$821.60
$2,014.40
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,836.00
Refer 23 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,317.55
Invoice 2160303
5/3/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,053.25
Invoice 2160304
5/3/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX -SODA
$23.25
Invoice 2160305
5/3/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $3,394.05
Refer
24 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$682.25
Invoice 2163942
5/1012017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$321.50
Invoice 2163941
5/10/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa
MIX
$89.00
Invoice 2163943
5/10/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,092.75
Refer
25 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED
-1401-
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/1711:19 AM
Page 7
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment
E 60949750-440 Other Contractual Servic CONTRACTED PEST CONTROL SVC 5-03-17
$52.02
Total $2,936.22
Refer
HWS
Invoice 5667739
5/3/2017
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$52.02
Refer
26 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION CO. INC
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$85.00
Invoice K-24731188
5/8/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$85.00
Refer
47 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R
WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 5-31-17
$15.00
Invoice S0576199 4/18/2017
Transaction Date 5/18/2017
•
Wells Fargo 10100
Refer 27 SIMPLE GRACE PROMOTIONS, IN
Cash Payment E 609-49750-218 Clothing and Uniforms EMBROIDERED POLO SHIRTS -QTY 12 -
HWS STAFF
Invoice 1347 5/5/2017
Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies GIFT CARD SLEEVES
Invoice 1349 5/8/2017
Total $15.00
$443.69
$232.44
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $676.13
Refer 29 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment
Invoice 1541686
Cash Payment
Invoice 1541687
Cash Payment
Invoice 1541688
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
5/11/2017
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
5/11/2017
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
5/11/2017
$2,440.88
$2,346.84
$75.10
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,862.82
Refer 28 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment
Invoice 1538934
Cash Payment
Invoice 1538935
Cash Payment
Invoice 1538936
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE
5/4/2017
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR
5/4/2017
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
5/4/2017
$1,131.00
$1,727.17
$78.05
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $2,936.22
Refer
48 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$1,322.58
Invoice 1544447
5/18/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$2,883.90
Invoice 1544448
5/18/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$89.91
Invoice 1544449
5/18/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $4,296.39
Refer
30 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPAN
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale
BEER
$3,273.55
Invoice 1862391
5/9/2017
_1402_
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/1711:19 AM
Page 8
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX
$216.00
Invoice 1710
5/17/2017
34 WINE COMPANY
Transaction Date 5/18/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $216.00
Refer
32 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED
Invoice 35740
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$1,560.96
Invoice 0180028
5/11/2017
Invoice 35740
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$24.00
Invoice 0180028
5/11/2017
Invoice 36435
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$112.00
Invoice 0180029
5/11/2017
Invoice 36435
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$1.50
Invoice 0180029
5/11/2017
s
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa SODA
$40.00
Invoice 0180030
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$3.00
Invoice 0180030
5/11/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,741.46
Refer
31 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale
LIQUOR
$152.75
Invoice 0179450
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.00
Invoice 0179450
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$56.00
Invoice 0179451
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$2.00
Invoice 0179451
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$264.00
Invoice 0179452
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$6.00
Invoice 0179452 5/4/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $484.75
Refer
34 WINE COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$284.00
Invoice 35740
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$4.20
Invoice 35740
5/4/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$352.00
Invoice 36435
5/11/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$8.25
Invoice 36435
5/11/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $648.45
s
_1403=
Refer
33 WINE COMPANY
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:19 AM
Page 9
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
t
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$312.00
Invoice 34820
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-265 Freight
FREIGHT
$6.30
Invoice 34820
4127/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $318.30
Refer
50 WINE MERCHANTS
_
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$326.00
Invoice 7133046
5/17/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For
Resa MIX
$19.75
Invoice 7133047
5/17/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $345.75
Refer
35 WINE MERCHANTS
_
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$936.00
Invoice 7131952
5/10/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE CREDIT
-$19.00
Invoice 713189
4/7/2017
Cash Payment
E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale
WINE
$285.00
Invoice 7130982
5/3/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100
Total $1,202.00
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
609 MUNICIPAL
LIQUOR FUND
$122,793.54
$122,793.54
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $122,793.54
Total $122,793.54
SEM
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:31 AM
Page 1
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
5
Batch Name 052317CITY-2 User Dollar Amt $21,665.30
Payments Computer Dollar Amt $21,665.30
$0.00 In Balance
Refer 1 3D SPECIALTIES _
Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms YELLOW T-SHIRTS- 16 PARKS STAFF, 10 $416.03
YELLOW VESTS
Invoice 455157
5/9/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
Transaction Date
5/16/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$416.03
Refer
2 ARROW BUILDING CENTER
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
2 X 12 #2 CEDAR- MOUND ENTRY SIGN
$96.60
REPAIR
Invoice 4186890
5/12/2017
Transaction Date
5/16/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$96.60
Refer
3 BAILEY NURSERIES, INC.
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-534 Tree Planting
15 TREES & SHRUBS- CITY PARKS
$311.75
Invoice 0494735
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-534 Tree Planting
100 1# RASPBERRY PLANTS
$323.00
Invoice 0494735
4127/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-534 Tree Planting
25 ASPARAGUS & 10 RHUBARB 1# PLANTS
$71.50
Invoice 0494646
4/27/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$706.25
Refer
4 CUTTERS EDGE
_
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair
FIRE RESCUE SAW REPAIR - REPLACED 3
$98.37
RIGHT BULLET CUTTERS & 4 LEFT BULLET
CUTTERS, CHAIN SHARPENING
Invoice 050917-6
5/9/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$98.37
Refer
5 DA VES MULCH STORE
Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
NORTHERN WHITE CEDAR CONTRACTORS
$160.00
Invoice 11692
4/26/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
Invoice 11698
4/26/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
Invoice 11723
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
Invoice 11725
4/27/2017
Cash Payment
E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material
MULCH
NORTHERN WHITE CEDAR CONTRACTORS $160.00
MULCH
NORTHERN WHITE CEDAR CONTRACTORS $160.00
MULCH
NORTHERN WHITE CEDAR CONTRACTORS $160.00
MULCH
NORTHERN WHITE CEDAR CONTRACTORS $160.00
MULCH
Invoice 11742 4/27/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $800.00
e
Refer 6 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES,/ _
Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies PGI BLACK CARBON SHIELD DOUBLE PLY $509.18
FIREFIGHTER HOODS- 12 QTY
Invoice 9654 5/5/2017 PO 24736
-1405-
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:31 AM
Page 2
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Invoice 052317 5/1/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Refer 11 NEWMAN SIGNS, INC.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials
Invoice 0309151 5/2/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Refer 12 RAYS SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal
Invoice 052317 5/15/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal
Invoice 052317 5/15/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Refer 13 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, L
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,750.00
SIGN MATERIALS- SHEETED BLANK, $2,913.31
NOTCHED, TURN, STOP AHEAD,
APPLICATION TAPE- STREETS
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,913.31
REMOVAL OF TREES @ SURFSIDE PARK $800.00
REMOVAL OF TREES @ TWIN PARK $500.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,300.00
Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 35 TREE GATOR BAGS- PARKS DEPT $675.29
Invoice 80408445 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $675.29
Refer 14 UHL COMPANY
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies
6 STREAMLIGHT SURVIVOR LED
$369.21
FLASHLIGHTS- FIRE DEPT
Invoice 9650
5/5/2017 PO 24736
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$878.39
Refer
7 FLEETPR/DE TRUCK & TRAILER P
Cash Payment
E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply
DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID 2.5 GALLON- 12
$146.04
QTY
Invoice 84842722
5/11/2017
Project 17-5
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$146.04
Refer
36 KLM ENGINEERING, INCORPORAT
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic WELL #8 TOWER-SCADA BOX DELIVERED
$1,200.00
TO CITY BY DEWEY PRINZING 5-4-17
Invoice 6355
5/12/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$1,200.00
Refer
8 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
Cash Payment
E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
5" FORM SEAL HOSE CLAMPS- 10 QTY &
$29.82
1/2" NIPPLES- 20 QTY WATER DEPT
Invoice 9304916683 5/4/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$29.82
Refer "
9 MINNESOTA BUSINESS ENTE_RPRI
Cash Payment
E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials
DUMP 12 CUBIC YDS OF FILL 4-28-17
$42.00
Invoice 39615
5/3/2017
Transaction Date
5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$42.00
Refer
10 MOUND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIA TIO
Cash Payment
E 222-42260-124 Fire Pens Contrib
MAY 2017 - FIRE RELIEF PENSION
$10,750.00
CONTRIBUTION
Invoice 052317 5/1/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Refer 11 NEWMAN SIGNS, INC.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials
Invoice 0309151 5/2/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Refer 12 RAYS SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal
Invoice 052317 5/15/2017
Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal
Invoice 052317 5/15/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Refer 13 SITE ONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY, L
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,750.00
SIGN MATERIALS- SHEETED BLANK, $2,913.31
NOTCHED, TURN, STOP AHEAD,
APPLICATION TAPE- STREETS
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,913.31
REMOVAL OF TREES @ SURFSIDE PARK $800.00
REMOVAL OF TREES @ TWIN PARK $500.00
Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,300.00
Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 35 TREE GATOR BAGS- PARKS DEPT $675.29
Invoice 80408445 5/10/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $675.29
Refer 14 UHL COMPANY
CITY OF MOUND 05/18/17 11:31 AM
Page 3
Payments
Current Period: May 2017
Invoice 86636927 5/3/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$179.09
Refer 16 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE
Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply
SLIDE BUSHING- 4 FOR STAND-UP MOWER-
$16.60
PARKS
Invoice 844372 5/8/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$16.60
Refer 17 VESSCO, INCORPORATED
Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply
CHLORINE SENSOR UNIT- WATER DEPT
$344.71
Invoice 69474 5/2/2017
Transaction Date 5/17/2017
Wells Fargo 10100 Total
$344.71
Fund Summary
10100 Wells Fargo
101 GENERAL FUND
$8,038.88
222 AREA FIRE SERVICES
$11,726.76
285 MOUND HRA
$179.09
601 WATER FUND
$1,574.53
602 SEWER FUND
$146.04
$21,665.30
Pre -Written Checks $0.00
Checks to be Generated by the Computer $21,665.30
Total $21,665.30
-1407-
MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
May 9, 2017
The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on
Tuesday, May 9, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Centennial Building.
Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Ray Salazar, Jeff Bergquist,
Jennifer Peterson, and Kelli Gillispie
Members absent: none
Others present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten, Director of Finance
and Administrative Services Catherine Pausche, Pam Myers, Todd Jable, Alec Jable, Dean
Umbehocker, Carter Umbehocker, Zachary Miller, Thomas Miller
Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in
nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered in normal sequence.
1. Open meeting
Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approve agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Bergquist, to approve the agenda with additions and
amendments. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
4. Consent agenda
MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the consent agenda.
Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried.
A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $142,998.04
B. Approve Minutes: 04-18-17 Special Meeting Workshop
04-25-17 Regular Meeting
C. Approve Pay Request #2, in the amount of $68,656.24 from Widmer Construction, LLC:
Island Park Water Main Loop, City Project PW -15-10
D. RESOLUTION NO. 17-66: RESOLUTION APPROVING PERMITS FOR 2017 SPIRIT
OF THE LAKES FESTIVAL AND WAIVING FEES DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF
GATHERING
E. RESOLUTION NO. 17-67: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING
PERMIT AND MUSICAL CONCERT PERMITS FOR WEDDING AT SURFSIDE PARK
AND BEACH ON SEPTEMBER 3, 2017
Mound City Council Minutes — May 9, 2017
F. RESOLUTION NO. 17-68: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING
PERMIT FOR 2017 MINNETONKA BASS CLASSIC FISHING TOURNAMENT BEING
HELD ON JUNE 3, 2017 AT SURFSIDE PARK AND BEACH
G. RESOLUTION NO. 17-69: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING
PERMIT AND MUSICAL CONCERT PERMITS FOR 2017 MUSIC IN THE PARK
SUMMER CONCERT SERIES AT SURFSIDE PARK AND BEACH AND MOUND
HARBOR DISTRICT AND WAIVING FEES DUE TO PUBLIC PURPOSE OF
GATHERING
H. RESOLUTION NO. 17-70: RESOLUTION OF SPONSORSHIP AS RELATED TO THE
SOUTHWEST TRAILS SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION
I. Approve application and permit for a 1 day temporary consumption and display permit
for the Northwest Tonka Lions May 18, 2018 fundraiser for and at WeCAN, 5213
Shoreline Blvd, Mound, MN
5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda.
6. Dr. Pamela Myers, with a bi-annual Westonka Historical Society update
Dr. Pamela Myers serves on the Board of the Westonka Historical Society but noted she
currently lives in Minnetonka. Myers provided a handout that included a financial report
from January through April 2017, a list of activities and services to the community. Myers
noted the backside showed healthy website traffic which is indicative of the increased
number of resources including newsletters and history talks that has fostered connections
with people far from Minnesota. Myers said the Mound Westonka Class of 2018 will be the
100th graduating class and the Museum has compiled information on the townships that
came together to open a high school. Myers told of other stories, including the old
telephone directories providing Rural Route numbers that can be used to convert to present
day addresses.
Myers noted a new event called "Treasures Uncovered" will be held at Lake Minnetonka
Shores on Saturday, September 23rd from 10 am to 12 noon where people can have an
appraisal of family heirlooms or antiques if they make a donation to the Museum.
Mayor Wegscheid thanked Myers and the volunteers for providing this valuable service.
7. Eric Hoversten, City Manager, with an update for the Council regarding Citizen Input
at April 25, 2017 meeting regarding 1672 Eagle Lane
Hoversten said at the April 25th meeting, Mr. Paul Kaster, 2600 Casco Point Road,
addressed council with concerns about a neighboring property abutting his rental property at
1672 Eagle Lane. Hoversten said there were outstanding building permits, and that a final
inspection for permits was due/performed May 1St with erosion control issues noted and the
issue being turned over to Field Officer Stewart Simon. Hoversten said the homeowner has
been contacted, but is struggling with an unresponsive contractor which may lead to a
voluntary abatement in order to facilitate remedy from the contractor. Kaster's tenant has
been and will continue to be included in the terms of the resolution.
Hoversten advised the public that "cheap is not always cheaper" and to vet contractors and
get referrals. Staff recommends having the contractor apply for the permits and not the
Mound City Council Minutes — May 9, 2017
property owner which helps to ensure accountability. The Mayor noted that a contractor's
willingness to pull a permit is another indication of their level of accountability.
Hoversten noted said this may come back to the Council again.
8. Action closing the meeting under Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.03, to consider
strategies related to labor negotiations under the Public Employment Labor Relations
Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 179A (see separate packet)
Mayor Wegscheid read the text of Agenda Item 8. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by
Gillispie, to close the meeting under Minnesota Statues, Section 13D.03. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
The meeting was closed at 7:20 pm and the Council retreated to the Conference Room.
The meeting was reopened at 8:20 pm.
9. Information/Miscellaneous
A. Comments/reports from Council Members
Hoversten noted the following upcoming events:
• May 20 - Mound Farmers' Market and More begins
• June 3 - Fire Dept fish fry. Tickets will be sold door-to-door by the firefighters. Tickets
can also be purchased at City Hall.
• July 21 & 22 - Spirit of the Lakes Festival
Hoversten also noted that drivers should use caution in the many work zones around the
City and follow all posted detours, slow down and sign up for alerts on the City's website.
Mayor Wegscheid congratulated Westonka High School English Teacher Corey Bulman for
being awarded the 2017 Minnesota Teacher of the Year and noted it is a great reflection on
our community to have such quality schools and teachers.
B. Reports: Finance Department - March 2017 YTD
Harbor Wine & Spirits - April 2017
C. Minutes: Parks & Open Spaces - March 9, 2017
D. Correspondence:
10. Adjourn
MOTION by Gillispie, seconded by Peterson, to adjourn at 8:28 p.m. All voted in favor.
Motion carried.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
-1410-
Real People. Real Solutions.
May 18, 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project
MNDOT/City Master Partnership Contract — Agreement # 1028101
City Project Nos. PW -17-01, PW -17-02, PW -17-03
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: 1952)448-8838
Fax: (9521448-8805
Botton-Menk.com
Attached is a letter from the Minnesota Department of Transportation briefly explaining the
purpose of the proposed Master Partnership Agreement with local agencies. As stated, it
provides a framework for Mn/DOT and local agencies to provide payment to each other for
services rendered.
This same agreement was approved by Council last year for the 2016 Street reconstruction
project but that agreement has an expiration date of June 30, 2017, so a "new" agreement is
necessary for the 2017 Street reconstruction project. The "new" agreement will be valid until
June 30, 2022.
The alternative to not executing this agreement is to have the City's geotechnical sub -consultant
complete the required tests but the city's cost would be higher, since MNDOT personnel are
typically full-time at the material supplier's plants, due to several State Aid projects using these
plants.
We recommend approval of the attached Resolution for the City to enter into a Master
Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Sincerely,
Balton & Menk, Inc.
�4.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
Balton & Menk is a
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 17 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT WITH THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WHEREAS, The Minnesota Department of Transportation wishes to cooperate closely with
local units of government to coordinate the delivery of transportation services and maximize
the efficient delivery of such services at all levels of government; and
WHEREAS, MnDOT and local governments are authorized by Minnesota Statutes sections
471.59, 174.02, and 161.20, to undertake collaborative efforts for the design, construction,
maintenance and operation of state and local roads; and
WHEREAS: the parties wish to be able to respond quickly and efficiently to such opportunities
for collaboration, and have determined that having the ability to write "work orders" against a
master contract would provide the greatest speed and flexibility in responding to identified
needs.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, MN:
1. That the City of Mound enter into a Master Partnership Contract with the Minnesota
Department of Transportation, a copy of which was before the City Council.
2. That the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute such contract, and any
amendments thereto.
3. That the City Director of Public Works, or his authorized representative, is authorized to
negotiate work order contracts pursuant to the Master Contract, which work order
contracts may provide for payment to or from MnDOT, and that the City Director of Public
Works, or his authorized representative, may execute such work order contracts
on behalf of the City of Mound without further approval by this City Council.
Adopted by the City Council this 23d day of May, 2017.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
-1412-
Metro State Aid
1500 County Road 62, Roseville, MN 55113
To: Local Agency
RE: Proposed Master Partnership Contract
651-234-7773
sharon.lemay@state.mn.us
Date: April 24, 2017
Attached is a copy of a proposed master partnership contract between the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (Mn/DOT) and your Local Agency.
The Master Partnership Contract provides a framework for Mn/DOT and Local Agencies to provide
services and payment to each other. A few MnDOT provided routine services are included in the
contract—see Exhibit A-- but all other services require work orders describing costs and scope.
Kindly review the enclosed document and if acceptable, arrange to have it presented to your
Council/Board for their approval and execution. Please provide signatures only under the Local
Government heading.
Also required is a new resolution passed by the Council/Board authorizing its officials to sign and
execute the agreement on its behalf. (Only the named officials may sign the agreement: if anyone else
signs in the named official's place, the agreement will not be executed.)
Please return to me at the address listed above or as a pdf to sharon.lemay@state.mn.us. Please note
that no work shall be performed by Mn/DOT personnel until the full execution of the agreement. After
execution by Mn/DOT and other State officials, a copy of the agreement will be returned to you.
if you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at 651-234-
7773. If your local agency will not be executing this contract, please send me an email informing me of
this so I can remove you from our list.
Thank You
Sharon LeMay, Metro State Aid
An Equal Opportunity Employer
r"1% DEPARTMENT OF
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
STATE OF MINNESOTA
AND
CITY OF MOUND
MASTER PARTNERSHIP CONTRACT
This master contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation in this contract
referred to as the "State" and the City of Mound, acting through its County Board, in this contract referred to as the "Local
Government."
Recitals
The parties are authorized to enter into this contract pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, §§ 15.061, 471.59 and 174.02.
Minn. Stat. § 161.20, subd. 2, authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to snake arrangements with and
cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk
highway system.
Each party to this contract is a "road authority" as defined by Minn. Stat. §160.02, subd. 25.
4. Minn. Stat. § 161.39, subd. 1, authorizes a road authority to perforin work for another road authority. Such work
may include providing technical and engineering advice, assistance and supervision, surveying, preparing plans
for the construction or reconstruction of roadways, and performing roadway maintenance.
Minn. Stat. § 174.02, subd. 6, authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into contracts with other
governmental entities for research and experimentation; for sharing facilities, equipment, staff, data, or other
ineans of providing transportation -related services; or for other cooperative programs that promote efficiencies in
providing governmental services, or that further development of innovation in transportation for the benefit of the
citizens of Minnesota.
6. Each party wishes to occasionally purchase services from the other party, which the parties agree will enhance the
efficiency of delivering governmental services at all levels. This Master Partnership Contract (MPC) provides a
framework for the efficient handling of such requests. This MPC contains terms generally governing the
relationship between the parties. When specific services are requested, the parties will (unless otherwise specified)
enter into a "Work Order" contracts.
After the execution of this MPC, the parties may (but are not required to) enter into "Work Order" contracts.
These Work Orders will specify the work to be done, timelines for completion, and compensation to be paid for
the specific work.
The parties are entering into this MPC to establish terms that will govern all of the Work Orders subsequently
issued under the authority of this Contract.
Master Partnership Contract
Term of Master Partnership Contract; Use of Work Order Contracts; Survival of Terms
1.1. Effective Date: This contract will be effective on the date last signed by the Local Government, and all
State officials as required under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 2.
1.2. A party must not accept work under this Contract until it is fully executed.
1.3. Expiration Date. This Contract will expire on June 30, 2022.
Page 1 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) -1414-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
1.4. Work Order Contracts. A work order contract must be negotiated and executed (by both the State and the
Local Government) for each particular engagement, except for Technical Services provided by the State
to the Local Government as specified in Article 2. The work order contract must specify the detailed
scope of work and deliverables for that project. A party must not begin work under a work order until the
work order is fully executed. The terns of this MPC will apply to all work orders contracts issued, unless
specifically varied in the work order. The Local Government understands that this MPC is not a guarantee
of any payments or work order assignments, and that payments will only be issued for work actually
performed under fully -executed work orders.
1.5. Survival of Terms The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this master contract
and all work order contracts: 12. Liability; 13. State Audits; 14. Government Data Practices and
Intellectual Property; 17. Publicity; 18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; and 22. Data Disclosure.
All terns of this MPC will survive with respect to any work order contract issued prior to the expiration
date of the MPC.
1.6. Sample Work Order. A sample work order contract is available upon request from the State.
1.7. Definition of "Providing Party" and "Requesting Party ". For the purpose of assigning certain duties and
obligations in the MPC to work order contracts, the following definitions will apply throughout the MPC.
"Requesting Party" is defined as the party requesting the other party to perforin work under a work order
contract. "Providing Party" is defined as the party performing the scope of work under a work order
contract.
2. Technical Services
2.1. Technical Services include repetitive low-cost services routinely performed by the State for the Local
Government. These services may be performed by the State for the Local Government without the
execution of a work order, as these services are provided in accordance with standardized practices and
processes and do not require a detailed scope of work. Exhibit A — Table of Technical Services is
attached.
2.1.1. Every other service not falling under the services listed in Exhibit A will require a work order
contract.
2.2. The Local Government may request the State to perform Technical Services in an informal manner, such
as by the use of email, a purchase order, or by delivering materials to a State lab and requesting testing. A
request may be made via telephone, but will not be considered accepted unless acknowledged in writing
by the State.
2.3. The State will promptly inform the Local Government if the State will be unable to perform the requested
Technical Services. Otherwise, the State will perforin the Technical Services in accordance with the
State's normal processes and practices, including scheduling practices taking into account the availability
of State staff and equipment.
2.4. Payment Basis. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties prior to performance of the services, the State
will charge the Local Government the State's then -current rate for performing the Technical Services.
The then -current rate may include the State's normal and customary additives. The State will invoice the
Local Government upon completion of the services, or at regular intervals not more than once monthly as
agreed upon by the parties. The invoice will provide a summary of the Technical Services provided by the
State during the invoice period.
Services Requiring A Work Order Contract
3.1. Work Order Contracts: A party may request the other party to perform any of the following services
under individual work order contracts.
Page 2 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) -1415-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
3.2. Professional and Technical Services. A party may provide professional and technical services upon the
request of the other party. As defined by Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd. 1, professional/technical services
"means services that are intellectual in character, including consultation, analysis, evaluation, prediction,
planning, programming, or recommendation; and result in the production of a report or completion of a
task." Professional and technical services do not include providing supplies or materials except as
incidental to performing such services. Professional and technical services include (by way of example
and without limitation) engineering services, surveying, foundation recommendations and reports,
environmental documentation, right-of-way assistance (such as performing appraisals or providing
relocation assistance, but excluding the exercise of the power of eminent domain), geometric layouts,
final construction plans, graphic presentations, public relations, and facilitating open houses. A party will
normally provide such services with its own personnel; however, a party's professional/technical services
may also include hiring and managing outside consultants to perform work provided that a party itself
provides active project management for the use of such outside consultants.
3.3. Roadway Maintenance. A party may provide roadway maintenance upon the request of the other party.
Roadway maintenance does not include roadway reconstruction. This work may include but is not limited
to snow removal, ditch spraying, roadside mowing, bituminous mill and overlay (only small projects),
seal coat, bridge hits, major retaining wall failures, major drainage failures, and message painting. All
services must be perforined by an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to
perforin such work, and work must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party performing the
work.
3.4. Construction Administration. A party may administer roadway construction projects upon the request of
the other party. Roadway construction includes (by way of example and without limitation) the
construction, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of mainline, shoulder, median, pedestrian or bicycle
pathway, lighting and signal systems, pavement mill and overlays, seal coating, guardrail installation, and
channelization. These services may be performed by the Providing Party's own forces, or the Providing
Party may administer outside contracts for such work. Construction administration may include letting
and awarding construction contracts for such work (including state projects to be completed in
conjunction with local projects). All contract administration services must be performed by an employee
with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work.
3.5. Emergency Services. A party may provide aid upon request of the other party in the event of a man-made
disaster, natural disaster or other act of God. Emergency services includes all those services as the parties
mutually agree are necessary to plan for, prepare for, deal with, and recover from emergency situations.
These services include, without limitation, planning, engineering, construction, maintenance, and removal
and disposal services related to things such as road closures, traffic control, debris removal, flood
protection and mitigation, sign repair, sandbag activities and general cleanup. Work will be performed by
an employee with sufficient skills, training, expertise or certification to perform such work, and work
must be supervised by a qualified employee of the party perfonning the work. If it is not feasible to have
an executed work order prior to performance of the work, the parties will promptly confer to detennine
whether work may be commenced without a fully -executed work order in place. If work commences
without a fully -executed work order, the parties will follow up with execution of a work order as soon as
feasible.
3.6. When a need is identified, the State and the Local Government will discuss the proposed work and the
resources needed to perforin the work. If a party desires to perform such work, the parties will negotiate
the specific and detailed work tasks and cost. The State will then prepare a work order contract.
Generally, a work order contract will be limited to one specific project/engagement, although "on call"
work orders may be prepared for certain types of services, especially for "Technical Services" items as
identified section 2. L. The work order will also identify specific deliverables required, and timeframes for
completing work. A work order must be fully executed by the parties prior to work being commenced.
Page 3 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04x'10/2017) -1416-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
The Local Government will not be paid for work performed prior to execution of a work order contract
and authorization by the State.
4. Responsibilities of the Providing Party
4.1. Terms Applicable to ALL Work Order Contracts. The terms in this section 4.1 will apply to ALL work
order contracts.
4.1.1. Each work order will identify an Authorized Representative for each party. Each party's
authorized representative is responsible for administering the work order, and has the authority to
make any decisions regarding the work, and to give and receive any notices required or permitted
under this MPC or the work order.
4.1.2. The Providing Party will furnish and assign a publicly employed licensed engineer (Project
Engineer), to be in responsible charge of the project(s) and to supervise and direct the work to be
performed under each work order contract. For services not requiring an engineer, the Providing
Party will furnish and assign another responsible employee to be in charge of the project. The
services of the Providing Party under a work order contract may not be otherwise assigned,
sublet, or transferred unless approved in writing by the Requesting Party's authorized
representative. This written consent will in no way relieve the Providing Party from its primary
responsibility for the work.
4.1.3. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, the Project Engineer may request in writing
specific engineering and/or technical services from the State, pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section
161.39. The work order Contract will require the Local Government to deposit payment in
advance. The costs and expenses will include the current State additives and overhead rates,
subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit.
4.1.4. Only the receipt of a fully executed work order contract authorizes the Providing Party to begin
work on a project. Any and all effort, expenses, or actions taken by the Providing Party before the
work order contract is fully executed are considered unauthorized and undertaken at the risk of
non-payment.
4.1.5. In connection with the performance of this contract and any work orders issued, the Providing
Agency will comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations. When the
Providing Party is authorized or permitted to award contracts in connection with any work order,
the Providing Party will require and cause its contractors and subcontractors to comply with all
Federal and State laws and regulations.
4.2. Additional Terms for Roadway Maintenance. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.2 will apply to
all work orders for Roadway Maintenance.
4.2.1. Unless otherwise provided for by contract or work order, the Providing Party must obtain all
pen -nits and sanctions that may be required for the proper and lawful performance of the work.
4.2.2. The Providing Party must perform maintenance in accordance with MnDOT maintenance
manuals, policies and operations.
4.2.3. The Providing Party must use State -approved materials, including (by way of example and without
limitation), sign posts, sign sheeting, and de-icing and anti -icing chemicals.
4.3. Additional Terms for Construction Administration. The terms of section 4.1 and this section 4.3 will
apply to all work order contracts for construction administration.
4.3.1. Contract(s) must be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder or best value proposer in
accordance with state law.
Page 4 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10,2017) -1417-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
4.3.2. Contractor(s) must be required to post payment and performance bonds in an amount equal to the
contract amount. The Providing Party will take all necessary action to make claims against such
bonds in the event of any default by the contractor.
4.3.3. Contractor(s) must be required to perform work in accordance with the latest edition of the
Minnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Construction.
4.3.4. For work performed on State right-of-way, contractor(s) must be required to indemnify and hold
the State harmless against any loss incurred with respect to the performance of the contracted
work, and must be required to provide evidence of insurance coverage commensurate with project
risk.
4.3.5. Contractor(s) must pay prevailing wages pursuant to applicable state and federal law.
4.3.6. Contractor(s) must comply with all applicable Federal, and State laws, ordinances and
regulations, including but not limited to applicable human rights/anti-discrimination laws and
laws concerning the participation of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in federally -assisted
contracts.
4.3.7. Unless otherwise agreed in a work order contract, each party will be responsible for providing
rights of way, easement, and construction permits for its portion of the improvements. Each party
will, upon the other's request, furnish copies of right of way certificates, easements, and
construction permits.
4.3.8. The Providing Party may approve minor changes to the Requesting Party's portion of the project
work if such changes do not increase the Requesting Party's cost obligation under the applicable
work order contract.
4.3.9. The Providing Party will not approve any contractor claims for additional compensation without
the Requesting Party's written approval, and the execution of a proper amendment to the
applicable work order contract when necessary. The Local Government will tender the processing
and defense of any such claims to the State upon the State's request.
4.3.10. The Local Government must coordinate all trunk highway work affecting any utilities with the
State's Utilities Office.
4.3.11. The Providing Party must coordinate all necessary detours with the Requesting Party.
4.3.12. If the Local Government is the Providing Party, and there is work performed on the trunk
highway right-of-way, the following will apply:
4.3.12.1 The Local Government will have a permit to perform the work on the trunk highway.
The State may revoke this permit if the work is not being performed in a safe, proper
and skillful manner, or if the contractor is violating the terms of any law, regulation, or
permit applicable to the work. The State will have no liability to the Local Government,
or its contractor, if work is suspended or stopped due to any such condition or concern.
4.3.12.2 The Local Government will require its contractor to conduct all traffic control in
accordance with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
4.3.12.3 The Local Government will require its contractor to comply with the terms of all
permits issued for the project including, but not limited to, National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and other environmental permits.
4.3.12.4 All improvements constructed on the State's right-of-way will become the property of
the State.
5. Responsibilities of the Requesting Party
Page 5 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 041 10/2017) -1418-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
5.1. After authorizing the Providing Party to begin work, the Requesting Party will furnish any data or
material in its possession relating to the project that may be of use to the Providing Party in performing
the work.
5.2. All such data furnished to the Providing Party will remain the property of the Requesting Party and will
be promptly returned upon the Requesting Party's request or upon the expiration or termination of this
contract (subject to data retention requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and
other applicable law).
5.3. The Providing Party will analyze all such data furnished by the Requesting Party. If the Providing Party
finds any such data to be incorrect or incomplete, the Providing Party will bring the facts to the attention
of the Requesting Party before proceeding with the part of the project affected. The Providing Party will
investigate the matter, and if it finds that such data is incorrect or incomplete, it will promptly determine a
method for furnishing corrected data. Delay in furnishing data will not be considered justification for an
adjustment in compensation.
5.4. The State will provide to the Local Government copies of any Trunk Highway fund clauses to be included
in the bid solicitation and will provide any required Trunk Highway fund provisions to be included in the
Proposal for Highway Construction, that are different from those required for State Aid construction.
5.5. The Requesting Party will perform final reviews and inspections of its portion of the project work. If the
work is found to have been completed in accordance with the work order contract, the Requesting Party
will promptly release any remaining funds due the Providing Party for the Project(s).
5.6. The work order contracts may include additional responsibilities to be completed by the Requesting Party.
6. Time
In the performance of project work under a work order contract, time is of the essence.
Consideration and Payment
7.1. Consideration. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the work order. The
State's normal and customary additives will apply to work performed by the State, unless otherwise
specified in the work order. The State's normal and customary additives will not apply if the parties agree
to a "lump sum" or "unit rate" payment.
7.2. State's Maximum Obligation. The total compensation to be paid by the State to the
Local Government under all work order contracts issued pursuant to this MPC will not
exceed $500,000.00
7.3. Travel Expenses. It is anticipated that all travel expenses will be included in the base cost of the
Providing Party's services, and unless otherwise specifically set forth in an applicable work order
contract, the Providing Party will not be separately reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses
incurred by the Providing Party in performing any work order contract. In those cases where the State
agrees to reimburse travel expenses, such expenses will be reimbursed in the same manner and in no
greater amount than provided in the current "MnDOT Travel Regulations" a copy of which is on file with
and available from the MnDOT District Office. The Local Government will not be reimbursed for travel
and subsistence expenses incurred outside of Minnesota unless it has received the State's prior written
approval for such travel.
7.4. Payment.
7.4.1. Generally. The Requesting Party will pay the Providing Party as specified in the applicable work
order, and will make prompt payment in accordance with Minnesota law.
7.4.2. Payment by the Local Government.
Page 6 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10i2017) -1419-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
7.4.2.1. The Local Government will make payment to the order of the Commissioner of
Transportation.
7.4.2.2. IMPORTANT NOTE: PAYMENT MUST REFERENCE THE "MNDOT
CONTRACT NUMBER" SHOWN ON THE FACE PAGE OF THIS CONTRACT
AND THE "INVOICE NUMBER" ON THE INVOICE RECEIVED FROM
MNDO T.
7.4.2.3. Remit payment to the address below:
MnDOT
Attn: Cash Accounting
RE: MnDOT Contract Number 1028101 and Invoice Number ######
Mail Stop 215
395 John Ireland Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
7.4.3. Payment by the State.
7.4.3.1. Generally. The State will promptly pay the Local Government after the Local
Government presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the
State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be
submitted as specified in the applicable work order, but no more frequently than monthly.
7.4.3.2. Retainage for Professional and Technical Services. For work orders for professional and
technical services, as required by Minn. Stat. § 16C.08, subd. 2(10), no more than 90
percent of the amount due under any work order contract may be paid until the final
product of the work order contract has been reviewed by the State's authorized
representative. The balance due will be paid when the State's authorized representative
determines that the Local Government has satisfactorily fulfilled all the terns of the work
order contract.
8. Conditions of Payment
All work performed by the Providing Party under a work order contract must be performed to the Requesting
Party's satisfaction, as detennined at the sole and reasonable discretion of the Requesting Party's Authorized
Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations. The Providing
Party will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of
federal or state law.
9. Local Government's Authorized Representative and Project Manager; Authority to Execute Work Order
Contracts
9.1. The Local Government's Authorized Representative for administering this master contract is the Local
Government's Engineer, and the Engineer has the responsibility to monitor the Local Government's
performance. The Local Government's Authorized Representative is also authorized to execute work
order contracts on behalf of the Local Government without approval of each proposed work order
contract by its governing body.
9.2. The Local Government's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract.
10. State's Authorized Representative and Project Manager
10.1. The State's Authorized Representative for this master contract is the District State Aid Engineer, who has
the responsibility to monitor the State's performance.
10.2. The State's Project Manager will be identified in each work order contract.
Page 7 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) -1420-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
11. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Contract Complete
11.1. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this MPC or any work
order contract without the prior consent of the other and a fully executed Assignment Contract, executed
and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this MPC, or their successors in office.
11.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this master contract or any work order contract must be in writing and
will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and
approved the original contract, or their successors in office.
11.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this master contract or any work order contract, that
failure does not waive the provision or the party's right to subsequently enforce it.
11.4. Contract Complete. This master contract and any work order contract contain all negotiations and
contracts between the State and the Local Government. No other understanding regarding this master
contract or any work order contract issued hereunder, whether written or oral may be used to bind either
party.
12. Liability.
Each party will be responsible for its own acts and omissions to the extent provided by law. The Local
Government's liability is governed by Minn. Stat. chapter 466 and other applicable law. The State's liability is
governed by Minn. Stat. section 3.736 and other applicable law. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal
remedies a party may have for the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations under this master contract or any
work order contract. Neither party agrees to assume any environmental liability on behalf of the other party. A
Providing Party under any work order is acting only as a "Contractor" to the Requesting Party, as the term
"Contractor" is defined in Minn. Stat. § 11513.03 (subd. 10), and is entitled to the protections afforded to a
"Contractor" by the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act. The parties specifically intend that
Minn. Stat. §471.59 subd. la will apply to any work undertaken under this MPC and any work order issued
hereunder.
13. State Audits
Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the party's books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and
practices relevant to any work order contract are subject to examination by the parties and by the State Auditor or
Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this MPC.
14. Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property
14.1. Government Data Practices. The Local Government and State must comply with the Minnesota
Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under
this MPC and any work order contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored,
used, maintained, or disseminated by the Local Government under this MPC and any work order contract.
The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by
either the Local Government or the State.
14.2. Intellectual Property Rights
14.2.1. Intellectual Property Rights. The Requesting Party will own all rights, title, and interest in all of
the intellectual property rights, including copyrights, patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and
service marks in the Works and Documents created and paid for under work order contracts.
Works means all inventions, improvements, discoveries (whether or not patentable), databases,
computer programs, reports, notes, studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings,
specifications, materials, tapes, and disks conceived, reduced to practice, created or originated by
the Providing Party, its employees, agents, and subcontractors, either individually or jointly with
others in the performance of this master contract or any work order contract. Works includes
"Documents." Documents are the originals of any databases, computer programs, reports, notes,
Page 8 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10%2017) -1421-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
studies, photographs, negatives, designs, drawings, specifications, materials, tapes, disks, or other
materials, whether in tangible or electronic forms, prepared by the Providing Party, its employees,
agents, or contractors, in the performance of a work order contract. The Documents will be the
exclusive property of the Requesting Party and all such Documents must be immediately returned
to the Requesting Party by the Providing Party upon completion or cancellation of the work order
contract. To the extent possible, those Works eligible for copyright protection under the United
States Copyright Act will be deemed to be "works made for hire." The Providing Party
Government assigns all right, title, and interest it may have in the Works and the Documents to
the Requesting Party. The Providing Party must, at the request of the Requesting Party, execute
all papers and perfonn all other acts necessary to transfer or record the Requesting Party's
ownership interest in the Works and Documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Requesting
Party grants the Providing Party an irrevocable and royalty -free license to use such intellectual
property for its own non-commercial purposes, including dissemination to political subdivisions
of the state of Minnesota and to transportation -related agencies such as the American Association
of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
14.2.2. Obligations with Respect to Intellectual Property.
14.2.2.1. Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not
patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced
to practice by the Providing Party, including its employees and subcontractors, in the
performance of the work order contract, the Providing Party will immediately give the
Requesting Party's Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must
promptly furnish the Authorized Representative with complete infornation and/or
disclosure thereon.
14.2.2.2. Representation. The Providing Party must perform all acts, and take all steps necessary
to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole
property of the Requesting Party, and that neither Providing Party nor its employees,
agents or contractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents.
15. Affirmative Action
The State intends to carry out its responsibility for requiring affinnative action by its Contractors, pursuant to
Minn. Stat. §363A.36. Pursuant to that Statute, the Local Government is encouraged to prepare and implement an
affirmative action plan for the employment of minority persons, women, and the qualified disabled, and submit
such plan to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. In addition, when the Local
Government lets a contract for the performance of work under a work order issued pursuant to this MPC, it must
include the following in the bid or proposal solicitation and any contracts awarded as a result thereof:
15.1. Covered Contracts and Contractors. If the Contract exceeds $100,000 and the Contractor employed more
than 40 full-time employees on a single working day during the previous 12 months in Minnesota or in
the state where it has its principle place of business, then the Contractor must comply with the
requirements of Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600. A Contractor covered
by Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 because it employed more than 40 full-time employees in another state and
does not have a certificate of compliance, must certify that it is in compliance with federal affirmative
action requirements.
15.2. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. Minn. Stat. § 363A.36 requires the Contractor to have an affirmative action plan
for the employment of minority persons, women, and qualified disabled individuals approved by the
Minnesota Commissioner of Human Rights ("Coinmissioner") as indicated by a certificate of compliance.
The law addresses suspension or revocation of a certificate of compliance and contract consequences in
that event. A contract awarded without a certificate of compliance may be voided.
15.3. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600.
Page 9 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 0410/2017) -1422-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
15.3.1. General. Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 implement Minn. Stat. § 363A.36. These rules
include, but are not limited to, criteria for contents, approval, and implementation of affirmative
action plans; procedures for issuing certificates of compliance and criteria for determining a
contractor's compliance status; procedures for addressing deficiencies, sanctions, and notice and
hearing; annual compliance reports; procedures for compliance review; and contract
consequences for non-compliance. The specific criteria for approval or rejection of an affirmative
action plan are contained in various provisions of Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 including,
but not limited to, parts 5000.3420-5000.3500 and 5000.3552-5000.3559.
15.3.2. Disabled Workers. The Contractor must comply with the following affirmative action
requirements for disabled workers:
15.3.2.1. The Contractor must not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of physical or mental disability in regard to any position for
which the employee or applicant for employment is qualified. The Contractor agrees to
take affirmative action to employ, advance in employment, and otherwise treat
qualified disabled persons without discrimination based upon their physical or mental
disability in all employment practices such as the following: employment, upgrading,
demotion or transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or
other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
15.3.2.2. The Contractor agrees to comply with the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota
Department of Human Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
15.3.2.3. In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the requirements of this clause,
actions for noncompliance may be taken in accordance with Minn. Stat. Section
363A.36, and the rules and relevant orders of the Minnesota Department of Human
Rights issued pursuant to the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
15.3.2.4. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and
applicants for employment, notices in a form to be prescribed by the commissioner of
the Minnesota Department of Human Rights. Such notices must state the Contractor's
obligation under the law to take affinnative action to employ and advance in
employment qualified disabled employees and applicants for employment, and the
rights of applicants and employees.
15.3.2.5. The Contractor must notify each labor union or representative of workers with which it
has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract understanding, that the
Contractor is bound by the terns of Minn. Stat. Section 363A.36, of the Minnesota
Human Rights Act and is committed to take affirmative action to employ and advance
in employment physically and mentally disabled persons.
15.3.3. Consequences. The consequences for the Contractor's failure to implement its affirmative action
plan or make a good faith effort to do so include, but are not limited to, suspension or revocation of
a certificate of compliance by the Commissioner, refusal by the Commissioner to approve
subsequent plans, and termination of all or part of this contract by the Commissioner or the State.
15.3.4. Certification. The Contractor hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Minn.
Stat. § 363A.36 and Minn. R. Parts 5000.3400-5000.3600 and is aware of the consequences for
noncompliance.
16. Workers' Compensation
Each party will be responsible for its own employees for any workers compensation claims. This MPC, and any
work order contracts issued hereunder, are not intended to constitute an interchange of government employees
under Minn. Stat. § 15.53. To the extent that this MPC, or any work order issued hereunder, is determined to be
Page 10 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 0410,2017) —1423—
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
subject to Minn. Stat. § 15.53, such statute will control to the extent of any conflict between the contract and the
statute.
17. Publicity
17.1. Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of a work order contract where the State is the
Requesting Party must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior
written approval from the State's Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity
includes notices, infonnational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public
notices prepared by or for the Local Government individually or jointly with others, or any
subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from a work
order contract.
17.2. Data Practices Act. Section 17.1 is not intended to override the Local Government's responsibilities
under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.
18. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue
Minnesota law, without regard to its choice -of -law provisions, governs this master contract and all work order
contracts. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this master contract or any work order contracts, or the breach of
any such contracts, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey
County, Minnesota.
19. Prompt Payment; Payment to Subcontractors
The parties must make prompt payment of their obligations in accordance with applicable law. As required by
Minn. Stat. § 16A.1245, when the Local Government lets a contract for work pursuant to any work order, the
Local Government must require its contractor to pay all subcontractors, less any retainage, within 10 calendar
days of the prime contractor's receipt of payment from the Local Government for undisputed services provided by
the subcontractor(s) and must pay interest at the rate of one and one-half percent per month or any part of a month
to the subcontractor(s) on any undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor(s).
20. Minn. Stat. § 181.59. The Local Government will comply with the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 181.59 which
requires: Every contract for or on behalf of the state of Minnesota, or any county, city, town, township, school,
school district, or any other district in the state, for materials, supplies, or construction shall contain provisions by
which the Contractor agrees: (1) That, in the hiring of common or skilled labor for the perfonnance of any work
under any contract, or any subcontract, no contractor, material supplier, or vendor, shall, by reason of race, creed,
or color, discriminate against the person or persons who are citizens of the United States or resident aliens who
are qualified and available to perform the work to which the employment relates; (2) That no contractor, material
supplier, or vendor, shall, in any manner, discriminate against, or intimidate, or prevent the employment of any
person or persons identified in clause (1) of this section, or on being hired, prevent, or conspire to prevent, the
person or persons from the performance of work under any contract on account of race, creed, or color; (3) That a
violation of this section is a misdemeanor; and (4) That this contract may be canceled or terminated by the state,
county, city, town, school board, or any other person authorized to grant the contracts for employment, and all
money due, or to become due under the contract, may be forfeited for a second or any subsequent violation of the
terns or conditions of this contract.
21. Termination; Suspension
21.1. Termination by the State for Convenience. The State or commissioner of Administration may cancel this
MPC and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the
Local Government. Upon termination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment,
determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed.
21.2. Termination by the Local Government for Convenience. The Local Government may cancel this MPC
and any work order contracts at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days written notice to the State.
Page 11 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04%10/2017) -1424-
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
Upon tennination, the Local Government and the State will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro
rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed.
21.3. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately tenninate or suspend this MPC and
any work order contract if it does not obtain funding from the Minnesota legislature or other funding
source; or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the services
covered here. Termination or suspension must be by written or fax notice to the Local Government. The
State is not obligated to pay for any services that are provided after notice and effective date of
termination or suspension. However, the Local Government will be entitled to payment, determined on a
pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available. The State will
not be assessed any penalty if the master contract or work order is terminated because of the decision of
the Minnesota legislature or other funding source, not to appropriate funds. The State must provide the
Local Government notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of the State's receiving that
notice.
22. Data Disclosure
Under Minn. Stat. §270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Local Government consents to disclosure of
its federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to
the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These
identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action
requiring the Local Government to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any.
23. Defense of Claims and Lawsuits
If any lawsuit or claim is filed by a third party (including but not limited to the Local Government's contractors
and subcontractors), arising out of trunk highway work performed pursuant to a valid work order issued under this
MPC, the Local Government will, at the discretion of and upon the request of the State, tender the defense of such
claims to the State or allow the State to participate in the defense of such claims. The Local Government will,
however, be solely responsible for defending any lawsuit or claim, or any portion thereof, when the claim or cause
of action asserted is based on its own acts or omissions in performing or supervising the work. The Local
Government will not purport to represent the State in any litigation, settlement, or alternative dispute resolution
process. The State will not be responsible for any judgment entered against the Local Government, and will not be
bound by the terms of any settlement entered into by the Local Government except with the written approval of
the Attorney General and the Commissioner of Transportation and pursuant to applicable law.
24. Additional Provisions
[The balance of this page has intentionally been left blank — signature page follows]
Page 12 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04/10/2017) -1425-
IiC�[IT#I�/�1.R►�lui�11
The Local Government certifies that the
appropriate person(s) have executed the contract on
behalf of the Local Government as required by
applicable ordinance, resolution, or charter
provision.
MnDOT Contract Number: 1028101
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
BY: (with delegated authority)
Assistant Commissioner or
Title: Title Assistant Division Director
Date: Date:
By:
Title By:
Date: Date:
Page 13 of 13
CM Master Partnership Contract (CM Rev. 04110,'2017) -1426-
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
As delegated to Materials Management Division
f -1427-
tA N O O
O t0 i0 O I� cn tt �
I �,
o
r-
72 72
O
0
W
H
111,
U
• N , �
'c3
fti � d
� v�j �
U ¢
bL)
d O
bD
ca
LO
tA
} Ofes.
r
p "a. o
CII
`n
U i O
R3
.�, O ...•C
O
O O
O E Gam•+ �
` w
� as
� � ; � a)
aOi
c
ed
W
$�
COLI
p
48)
•�
p
C4
O N
O N
n
a�oi o
±Hi ml
s 3
cd
U y
.. b � •f1'
%
O
cli
cd
.d,42
V 0:.OU
SS6
ed
S1
>b . 'O r2
O cd O
j O
U O
V
N
bb O r O
cdd E
p, Wcd.
cr. t`E
bio bO4
sz Cd
Y C U ^�"
cd
y iD.
jjC
�.a,
a m",L U
_
cd 'j
p
d O
Oj
a «i; O
O
O
cn 4:
i y#K b�213
r p
Y OOtnY
e
+p' bOR.
; V)
bOA
C',
cd
cd td ,
I
p
k N
i
t U �; A..
y "t7 •'-°
n'CL
cilia
cc=
U�i-�..
a
f—CIS
i
0
r
d<
t
i
f -1427-
tA N O O
O t0 i0 O I� cn tt �
I �,
o
r-
72 72
O
0
W
H
O U O T +U+ O bA Cj t G
s „C 'e ..O O • „O i ` V +•, U 0) Y U pp vi
y 3 ai a> 3 w o bq
a> s. s at U p &0 cd w
by v o cl
'� w " Ln
U a� �s y
s�.� O ' ic3 0 3 p„ "Cd' `a-
o at .o o a °_
n O + O 1 y + O ^� O U O N s~
"O N tll:.� N bq O� bq 0 Cd
vi
a � " ss o Cd
b '� b0 'dd U a3 v
:~ o
Y g
:.. b • � rn �,. �/s +. Q. 'C
to
cj� • �, ami O W Cd rYi� 4 bA 4-.
0 U M aj N cd p 0) ni
U Y
Cs
t5 0 cd 0
O ,b 0 X N b4 ^ U p ti.., y., f N Q >, yU., •:U 7; rn
yN OJ cn O, .70� i O n7 O ^� 1~ «t ,OcC N
0 t ¢.
.� Cr.> OU •� p 'C3•O 3 +�^+ Op
7:1 cd
CII
r CactO v :3v.+In
Ln
•%BAE.
Cd
0 cd m bb
at 7
zby > ocd
bn w°
1 - ti �, ^.�cd
v as ani °�' ' � a� l E ty t;o E
UU U v " u. N t0 "0 ( �
0 0
N p U U • A. �-+ N �- S3, .o-. a ,� a3 ; ' X bbD to 1 O a
N p a3 s]. Q. v� U bq y :-• bA U G
w oc r °.� v o� Y % o v s
QC13 u
o zs m uw U" v o�
[- at bre v; o •E o m U o Cd =
p _ o "d o>✓n # �" a� n' U c�4. o a��i •� o ? o a. m v .� 4- Ct
s... Q �' «-� yi • pp �, � i� z-• •.�.�:. �3 `cc1 •� :� ti {
p 5 O y_ {O� U L3 °� �y cd O y U vi p 'y
14.
"'O (U/1 O U t ,"' `� i-1 I m .E"+ p 4.. In O N "r'e w eC 4� ed O j = era
cd o -
'n O, Q U ^
to ' j ID v O
01 t U 0 G U bA w s..
U : O 40 , 01 -0 U `n "U vNa 0 �•' t _, rn
N cl ''^ >:l, O M O "G ¢ p R: O CL `i• C ,.O , O 't7 : a3 U t 0A
U p U v 0 tct N 0 ar
4=. ^p -fl fy cd at a' cG .0 O O: ^, 0 N U .,s-„ cc1 v,
bA u; �- v, t cn Cl$3 y ao aa. o 'd
Cd
a�
4° o o Ge a o
^C �,..,C ,� �: s.. �' •p G. 'p r ,; y U U U cci "'.' ;� O oq "� U +li: a" C n
~ U U 0 o� �� U � a> �= y c � A
S]. m � cc0 Pa x., ,.Gi P -i cn m r... Q � ,.C? H G�' .� ��" m ID. � fz+ m
i
r
3
{
U u
U {{
y •y p ;.id
Ln o a' RsU
Cd
CIS
Cm. at I bD U
(Ci !,0
I � i
-142,8-
N 1
[t i
In
bD
C3 100 00 00 00
+oo
o mow^ } o cs ° 'A
'0 to Cd { 9 0
U 4y i,z p o p
Q o 4 ° ` v j o ° C -)cd
o > o
o I o �3 o
o ❑ ao;v o
as Y78 y o
co a >v
O c A O w rncd.b '�
v �� '� ° Pw i ° ^n. ° � o
yo 4.1c
two p o r s P I'a bn a a a xx Z o
to
cn
?"
coi 3 a°i o U cn
(o . p o ao to CQo a
Q
w b4
bto
o ;o. 0 °o
`V v �' $ Cd r o
2 bb
o o'V o 3 a? '" S ° .�
o o a oo o .0
cd ma
co U O .w n p ac) E:: °rb `� � ° � o � � 0.a � ami
j 1 . air"I N r ._O O ,e40
wrO
O € OI bb UO M! Q n
0 -0
75
wO W°L7 i1p1 ° pf` �v -' x(J 1 0.+ •''� �+ zin SN" : `� .. x F k«i'j4cd U
cd !3' = :C4 CCp �N O 0
r To p
w 00 -0 d U N 'C7 U -0 'YUCN3
' �
0 o � �E oU 5 i U.r-o
E
Up
o
cn
V CZ
Eb al
yo� 5.
',U T3 o UYtO
O Q s e
U�U
Uo O�JOy
'fl�o� o'• M 0 : bb 2 c ' O 'w -� -0
y C'3 C> -0 U c 0 V, U O 0 -0
p Y cc
cC 2 o 0
czw a
o.•s en -O -C E o "0 �o o
0�oCIS
U VI -O aT, '4 po3 v� �+>m�yoo9 E�i
E. bA
o 0
sU.'.� �'j U N,vs. b�D •..� ,y U *�., ,. U p o %.. U :`n: oO O N
y to N
tz
CIS b° �.o o o os•� o 0 07; ro cd o
° U• ° 3 sU., b4 O 4 v�, � O
L�.
�' ` t6 i p
O w e ., N sU, cd+""p O O U iU+ : U x •1-.' : "C3 V]
7-1 as' c G o! O s. N u�i U
U ttt � j p
cz
zn -01
bD
Cd
�
;..� O f a
'b4 ` ^UJ 47 O
6 ' y
r�
r t t
W ! Q
w
c �O yUU co
- bD bA v bA b4 bq
9b 7-2
M ( '-1429-
^C> It O SC -1 ?�O �t7`d. N�O, i0 N
^-� 3 ^" S N N : Nrl
:�
m
N
ME.
D g
C13
ce
co
rz &I
E o " u
Ed (5
pK
Jo
cd
3 0
04
c
ar -14
Z
Z
6 Z
id
t
6! a).N
4 N
7t -
>
0
'o
,
4)
0 as
U
cz
-tG
t4=
45
`p0,
-0
>
z
N.
C�d
Loll
Sol
E
Cd 5
—,G SH
10-
0
�2�
43
(1) —
U =� u
140apt b — q� - r. q) >, 0
m r" cd 'A r-
i �
L)
o
7
cd: o
-d
bo —
.2
Cr
141! C, C)
0 Lf)
'-b , -dv*
cz
E
-c4! = '(� �m 0
-ti
r -
0 0
N cd N
.2
0� 0
cr U Ei E
E
-Lt
43
42 ".o :1
42
m
E
mo
C-1
C,3
L) s 4
-1430-
,'1- 00 rn
m M�
00 oo� oo
CIA C-1 � "
ol C)
C:>
D g
Real People. Real Solutions.
May 18, 2017
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
City of Mound
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
RE: 2016 Lift Station Improvement Project
Change Order No. 2
City Project No. PW -16-05
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
2638 Shadow Lane
Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
Ph: 1952)448-8838
Fax: 1952)448-8805
Bolton-Menk.com
Attached is Change Order No. 2 which extends the Substantial Completion date from June 2,
2017 to June 16, 2017 and the Final Completion date from June 16, 2017 to June 30, 2017. There
is no proposed change in contract price with Change Order No. 2.
The contractor has been responsive to the unknown issues encountered with this project. They
are fully aware of the need to complete the lift station improvement project prior to the
commencement of the City's Lynwood Boulevard street and utility improvement project. We
recommend approval of the attached Resolution approving Change Order No. 2.
Sincerely,
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
-1431-
Botton & Menk is an equal opportunity
CITY OF MOUND
RESOLUTION NO. 17 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, 2016 LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENTS —
CITY PROJECT NO. PW -16-05
WHEREAS, Resolution 16-50 awarded the contract for the 2016 Lift Station Improvement Project to
Pember Companies, Inc. (Contractor) in the amount of $168,112.05; and
WHEREAS, the presence of contaminated and potentially hazardous soil, water and vapor, emanating
from the former Tonka Toys site (Balboa Center, 5300 Shoreline Drive), was discovered subsequent to
preparation of final plans and specifications for the 2016 Lift Station Improvement project; and
WHEREAS, in order for the Contractor to fully address all contamination issues, Change Order No. 1
was approved by Council on April 25, 2017 increasing the contract amount by $74,288.26 and
extending the Substantial Completion date from October 20, 2016 to June 2, 2017 and the Final
Completion date from November 3, 2016 to June 16, 2017; and
WHEREAS, the contractor has indicated more time is needed to complete the project and has
submitted a letter requesting the Substantial Completion date be extended to June 16, 2017 and the
Final Completion date be extended to June 30, 2017; and
WHEREAS, these revised completion dates will provide for completion of the 2016 Lift Station
Improvement Project before the City's 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement project
contractor, Park Construction, is scheduled to commence work on Lynwood Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 2 has been prepared, signed by the contractor and submitted to the
City for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota:
That Change Order No. 2, attached to this Resolution, extending the Substantial and Final completion
dates to June 16, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively, with no change in contract price, is hereby
approved.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of May, 2017.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk
Mayor, Mark Wegscheid
-1432-
Change Order
Date of Issuance: 5/18/2017 Effective Date: 5/23/2017
Project: 2016 Lift Station Owner: City of Mound, MN Owner's Contract No.: PW -16-05
Improvements — Lynwood Blvd
LS D2
Contract: 2016 Lift Station Improvements Date of Contract: 4/27/2016
Contractor: Pember Companies, Inc. N4449 469th Street, Engineer's Project No.: 012.111100
Menomonie, WI 54751
The Contract Documents are modified as follows neon execution ution of this Chanize Order:
Description: -extension of contract completion dates due to preparation of necessary health and safety plans and
staff training.
Attachments (list documents supporting change):
CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE: CHANGE IN CONTRACT TIMES:
Original Contract Price: Original Contract Times: EJ Working days ® Calendar days
Substantial completion (days or date): 10/20/2016
$ 168 112.05 Ready for final payment (days or date): 11/03/2016
9rIncease Decrease] from previously approved
ange rders No. 1 and Extra Work : Change from previously approved Change Order No. 1
Substantial completion: June 2, 2017
$ 74 288.26 Ready for final payment: June 16, 2017
Contract Price prior to this Change Order:
$ 242 400.31
[No Change] of this Change Order: =Decrease] of this Change Order:
Substantial completion (days or date): 6/16/2017
$ 74 288.26 Ready for final payment (days or date): 6/30/2017
Contract Price incorporating this Change Order: Contract Times with all approved Change Orders:
Substantial completion (days or date): 6/16/2017
$ 242 400.31 Ready for final payment (days or date): 6/30/2017
RECOMMENDED: ACCEPTED: ACCEPTED:
LIM
Engineer (Authorized Signature)
Date:
Owner (Authorized Signature)
Date:
LI -A
Contractor (Authorized Signature)
Date:
EJCDC L1433_1ge Order
Prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee and endorsed by the Construction Specifications Institute.
__ Page 1 of I
a
z
87ti'
N4449 - 469th Street Menomonie, Wisconsin 54751
Phone: 715-235-0316 Grading * Utility Installation * Curb and Gutter * Sidewalk Fax: 715-235-9006
May 15, 2017
Bolton & Menk
Matt Bauman, P.E.
2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318-1172
RE: Extension Request
2016 Lift Station Improvements Project — D2
City of Mound, MN
BMI Project No. C12.111100
Dear Mr. Bauman,
We would like to request a formal extension for the Substantial and Final Completion dates for 2016 Lift
Station Improvements Project—D2 for the City of Mound, MN. We would like to extend the Substantial
Completion date to 6/16/17 and Final Completion of 6/30/17. We are not anticipating needing the
length of time requested but this will allow for weather delays or other unforeseen circumstances. We
are anxious to complete the Lift Station work as well, as we understand that there is another project
waiting for our completion.
Sincerely,
Nicole Bowman
Project Manager
EEO/AA (W/MNets/_1434_) Employer
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952) 472-0604
MEMORANDUM
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Sarah Smith
Date: May 17, 2017
Re: May 23, 2017 Council Consent Agenda Item - Musical Concert Permit for Special
Event/Private Party
Overview. Colleen Dehmer, property owner of 2015 Lakeside Lane, has submitted Musical Concert
Permit application requesting approval to allow a 1 -person acoustic performance to be held at a private
party she is having at her residence on June 9, 2017. Some highlights about the event are summarized
below:
• Expected attendance is 40 people. The scheduled music time is 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
® The applicant has indicated that the musical performance will be moved inside in the event of
inclement weather.
® The 2017 Fee Schedule, approved by the City Council at its December 13, 2016 meeting,
requires a Musical Concert Permit fee of $50.00 per day unless a Public Gathering Permit fee is
being paid, in which case the Musical Concert Permit fee is waived. As the event is on
private property, a Public Gathering Permit is not required. Therefore, a fee of $50.00 is
required for the permit.
Information about the private event and permit application was provided to Staff, the Orono
Police Department, the Mound Fire Department, and the Public Works Department.
Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Musical Concert Permit for a private party to be
held at 2015 Lakeside Lane on Friday, June 9, 2017, subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of all required public
agency permits that are needed to hold the event.
2. Amplified music, speakers and PA/sound systems are to be directed in the
direction best suited to minimize impact upon neighbors.
3. Applicant must notify adjacent property owners of the private event in advance of the
wedding.
-1435-
4. Any signage for the event shall be in accordance with City Code Chapter 119 including
the need for any required permits.
5. Payment of $50.00 Musical Concert Permit Fee.
A draft resolution, based on Staffs recommendation, has been prepared for consideration and action
by the City Council.
Page 2
-1436-
ffliffim
tki MEN NO Oil 1100 1 W 0 MR4 U W1 t 1 ON wl�
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016, the City Council of the City of Mound adopted
Resolution 16-169 to establish its Fee Schedule for 2017 ("Fee Schedule'); and
WHEREAS, the Fee Schedule set the Musical Concert Fee at $50 per day unless a
Public Gathering Permit Fee is being paid; and
WHEREAS, Colleen Dehmer, on May 16, 2017, submitted a Musical Concert Permit
application requesting approval to allow a 1 -person, acoustic performance from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00
p.m. for a private parry at 2015 Lakeside Lane on June 9, 2017; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager and City Staff have eviewed said application and have
recommended reasonable conditions which are as set forth in a Staff Memorandum to the City
Council dated May 17, 2017; ("Conditions"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council, upon recommendation of the City Manager and City
Staff, reviewed the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound as
follows:
1. The recitals set forth above are incorporated into this Resolution.
2. The Musical Concert Permit is approved with Conditions.
Adopted by the City Council this 23rd day of May, 2017.
Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk
-1437-
Mayor Mark Wegscheid
Date of M' usical Concert
:I.,ICENSE #
CITY OF MOUND
2415 WILSHIRE BLVD.
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
MUSICICAL CONCERT PERMIT APPLICATION
(Including, but not limited to, live music, music provided by a disc jockey, and/or any type of amplified
music)
EVENT: ,
LOCATION OF MUSICAL CON
(Aint� aged AAA)
TYPE OF MUSICICAL CONCERT: a C( U4SC,
TIME PERIOD OF MUSICAL CONCERT -7 t() VV -7
(HOURS PERMITTED: Mon - Sun: 7:00 am - 10:00 pm)
REQUESTED EXTENSION OF HOURS:
(Council approval must he received to conduct a musical concert after 10:00 pm)
APPLICANT: r, I f P P li'1 I–) -e W M40 ---- CONTACT:
ADDRESS: ( tQ k o 6o t j kj -P ADDRESS:
'- (*u act c M N
E-MAIL 44( rzt—t� Sit Yt� e,- c�J �G2 Cc vet
HOME PHONE #:
11-7
Date
WORK PHONE #: "
��6/� 11/1 /a
pplicanfs Signature
-1438-
Diew:. .
epartin .Rev
Approved Denied
Police Dept.
Adm
Fire ;Dept
City of
• •
'Aarrison Bay Senior• • TIF Distriei
The following summary contains an overview of the basic elements of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
for the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District. More detailed information on
each of these topics can be found in the complete Tax Increment Financing Plan.
Proposed action: Establishment of the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing
District (the 'District") and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan
(the "TIF Plan").
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbor Project Area
which includes the geographic expansion of the Mound Harbor Project Area
and the establishment of the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment
Financing District, which represents a continuation of the goals and objectives
set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbor Project Area.
Modification of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Mound Harbor Tax
Increment Financing District to reflect the expanded boundaries of the Mound
Harbor Project Area to include the area up to and inclusive of the Harrison Bay
Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District.
Type of TIF District: A redevelopment district
Parcel Numbers: 14-117-24-14-0001 14-117-24-14-0003
14-117-24-14-0004
Proposed The District is being created to facilitate the construction of 72 units of senior
Development: housing consisting of 52 units of assisted living and 20 units of memory care in
the City. Fifteen of the units (20%) are anticipated to be affordable to
households witl'i incomes at or below 50% of area median income. Please see
Appendix A of the TIF Plan for a more detailed project description.
Maximum duration: The duration of the District will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first
increment (26 years of increment). The City expects the date of first tax
increment to be 2019. It is estimated that the District, including any
modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would
terminate after December 31, 2044, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied.
Estimated annual tax Up to $283,441
increment:
EHLERS
LEAnrac ib angLlC FINANCE
-1439-
Authorized uses: The TIF Plan contains a budget that authorizes the maximum amount that
may be expended:
Land/Building Acquisition...................................................$250,000
Site Improvements/Preparation ..............................................$200,000
Utilities...................................................................................$150,000
Affordable Housing............................................................$2,225,000
Other Qualifying Improvements ............................................$409,521
Administrative Costs (up to 10%) ..........................................$505.723
PROJECT COSTS TOTAL ................................................$3,740,244
Interest................................................................................1 822 711
PROJECT COSTS TOTAL.............................................$5,562,955
See Subsection 3-10, on page 3-6 of the TIF Plan for the full budget
authorization.
Foran of financing: The project is proposed to be financed by a pay-as-you-go note and interfund
loan.
Administrative fee: Up to 10% of annual increment, if costs are justified.
Interfund Loan If the City wants to pay for administrative expenditures from a tax increment
Requirement: fund, it is recommended that a resolution authorizing a loan from another
fund be passed PRIOR to the issuance of the check.
4 Year Activity Rule After four years from the date of certification of the District one of the
(§ 469.176 Subd. 6) following activities must have been commenced on each parcel in the District:
• Demolition
• Rehabilitation
• Renovation
• Other site preparation (not including utility services such as sewer and
water)
If the activity has not been started by approximately May 2021, no additional
tax increment may be taken from that parcel until the commencement of a
qualifying activity.
5 Year Rule Within 5 years of certification revenues derived from tax increments must be
(§ 469.1763 Subd. 3) expended or obligated to be expended.
Any obligations in the District made after approximately May 2022, will not
be eligible for repayment from tax increments.
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the TIF Plan for the District, as required
pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3, are included in Exhibit A of the City resolution.
Page 2
10 EHLERS
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
-1440-
Legend
Page 3
ja EHLERS
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
-1441-
p E cu rlM .
CITY OF MOUND
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Council member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE MOUND HARBOR PROJECT AREA; AND ESTABLISHING
THE HARRISON BAY SENIOR HOUSING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT THEREIN AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
PLAN THEREFOR.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for
the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "HRA") has heretofore established the Mound Harbor Project Area
and adopted a Redevelopment Plan therefor. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that the City
and the HRA adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification")
for the Mound Harbor Project Area (the "Project"), and establish the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax
Increment Financing District (the "District") therein and adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF
Plan") therefor (the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein
as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all
as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the's consideration.
1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the
Plans to be prepared.
1.03. The HRA and City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to
the establishment of the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not
limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 277 having taxing
jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, a review of and written comment on the Plans
by the City Planning Commission on May 2, 2017, approval of the Plans by the HRA on May 23, 2017,
and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law.
1.04. Certain written reports (the "Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities
contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council
and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information
and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in
this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby
incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein.
1.05. The City is modifying the boundaries of the Project to include the area up to and
inclusive of the District and is modifying the Redevelopment Plan therefor.
Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification.
2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds that:
(a) the land within the Project as expanded would not be available for redevelopment without the financial
aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan Modification; (b) the Redevelopment Plan Modification
will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development
of the Project by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan Modification conforms to the
general plan for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole.
Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of the Harrison Bay. Senior Housing Tax Increment
Financing District.
3.01. The Council hereby fords that the District is necessary and desirable for the sound and
orderly development of the Project and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare and
is a "housing district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the Act.
3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed development would not occur solely through
private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future, that the Plans conform to the general plan
for the development and redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the Plans will afford maximum
opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development and
redevelopment of the District by private enterprise.
3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings
stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing,
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 4. Public Purpose,
4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will
help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide needed affordable
senior housing opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the City and
the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City believes
these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private
developer will receive only the assistance needed to make this development financially feasible. As such,
any private benefits received by a developer are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public
benefits.
Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans.
5.01. The reasons and facts supporting the findings in this resolution are described in the Plans.
5.02. The modification to the Project and the creation of the District are hereby approved. The
Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of
objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed
on file in the office of the City Finance Director/Clerk.
5.03. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to
proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council
for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose.
-1443-
5.04. The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of
the District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the
original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the HRA is authorized and directed to forthwith
transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together
with a list of all properties within the District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18
months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution.
5.05. The City Finance Director/Clerk is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the
Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State
Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member
and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Dated: May 23, 2017
ATTEST:
Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Eric Hoversten, City Manager
(Seal)
-1444-
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO.
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for
the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows:
Finding that the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District is a housing
district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11,
Harrison Bay Senior Housing TIF District consists of three parcels. The development will consist
of a mixed -income housing project with a total of 72 units, which includes 52 units of assisted
living and 20 units of memory care. All or a portion of which will receive tax increment
assistance and will meet income restrictions described in M.S. 469.1761. At least 20 percent of
the units receiving assistance will have incomes at or below 50 percent of statewide median
income. Appendix E of the TIF Plan contains background for the above finding.
2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably
be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future.
The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is
supported by the fact that the development proposed in this plan is a housing district that meets
the City's objectives for development and redevelopment. The cost of land acquisition, site and
public improvements and utilities makes this housing development infeasible without City
assistance. Due to the high costs of building affordable new housing in the City, the cost of
financing the proposed public improvements, costs to include affordable housing, and the
insufficiency of rents in an affordable housing development to provide a sufficient rate of return,
this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The
developer was asked for and provided a letter and a proforma as justification that the developer
would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use
of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result
from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax
increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding
is justified on the grounds that the cost of land acquisition, site and public improvements and
utilities add to the total development cost. Historically, site development costs and reduced rents
required for the affordable units in this area have made development infeasible without tax
increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other development of similar scope
is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the
development.
3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District
conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a
whole.
The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the
general development plan of the City.
4. Finding that the TIF Plan for Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District
will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the
development or redevelopment of Mound Harbor Project Area by private enterprise.
Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the HRA and the City will provide an impetus for
affordable senior residential development, which is desirable or necessary for increased
population and an increased need for life -cycle housing within the City.
-1446-
As of May 15, 2017
Draft for^ Public Hearing
0071 MW
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota
Hennepin County
State of Minnesota
Adopted:
Modification No. I Public Hearing:
March 22, 2005
May 23, 2017
Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105
651-697-8500 fax: 651-697-8555 www.ehlers-inc.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(for reference purposes only)
SECTION I
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MOUND HARBOR PROJECT AREA ..............
1-1
Subsection 1-1. Definitions ..............................................
1-1
Subsection 1-2. Statement of Need and Public Purpose .......................
1-2
Subsection 1-3. Statutory Authority .......................................
1-4
Subsection 1-4. Statement of Objectives ...................................
1-5
Subsection 1-5. Project Area ............................................
1-5
Subsection 1-6. Property Acquisition ......................................
1-5
Subsection 1-7. Redevelopment Project Financing ...........................
1-5
APPENDIX A
Description of Project Area ................................................
A-1
APPENDIX B
Map of Project Area .....................................................
B-1
APPENDIX C
HKGI Analysis of Blight Conditions .........................................
C-1
APPENDIX D
Mound Harbor Renaissance Sketch Plan (July 2004) ...........................
D-1
SECTION I
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MOUND HARBOR PROJECT AREA
Subsection 1-1. Definitions
The terms defined below have, for purposes of this Redevelopment Plan, the meanings herein specified, unless
the context specifically requires otherwise:
"Authority" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mound, Minnesota.
"Bond" means any tax-exempt or taxable bonds issued by the City or Authority to finance the Public
Redevelopment Costs, and any obligations issued to refund such bonds.
"City" means the City, of Mound, Minnesota.
"City Council" means the City Council of the City.
"County" means Hennepin County, Minnesota.
"HRA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047.
"Project" means the Mound Harbor Redevelopment Project, the boundaries ofwhich are generally described
in Exhibit A and generally illustrated in the map attached as Exhibit B.
"Project Area" means the area within the boundaries of the Project as shown in Exhibits A and B.
"Public Redevelopment Costs" means all legally permissible costs incurred or to be incurred by or on behalf
of the Authority in carrying out the Redevelopment Plan, including but not limited to: (a) the costs of any
redevelopment activities consistent with the Redevelopment Plan as originally adopted or subsequently amended;
(b) costs of administering the Project; and (c) debt service payments on any obligations issued to finance Public
Costs authorized by the Redevelopment Plan.
"Redevelopment Plan" means this Redevelopment Plan for the Project as it may be amended or supplemented
from time to time.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Financing District" or "TIF District" means any tax increment financing district that may be
established under the TIF Act within the Project.
"Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179,
as amended and supplemented from time to time.
"Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the Tax Increment Financing Plan for any Tax Increment Financing
District.
"Tax Increments" means the tax increments derived from any Tax Increment Financing District.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the Cite of MoL-1449-ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area
Subsection 1-2. Statement of Need and Public Purpose
The Authority finds that there is a need for redevelopment within the City and the Project Area to remedy blight
and blighting conditions, preventthe emergence ofblight, promote the health, safety and welfare ofCity residents,
encourage related development and redevelopment in order to protect, improve the tax base and general economic
vitality of the City, and assure that the long term housing needs of the City are met.
The Authority specifically finds that: (a) the land within the Project Area would not be available for
redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan
will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the
Project by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the
development of the City as a whole.
The Authority further finds that the Project is a "redevelopment project" within the meaning of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.001, subd. 16 of the HRA Act.
The factual basis for the above findings includes:
A. The City has conducted several studies of the Project Area, including the Mound Visions Concept
Plan (1991), the Mound Environmental and Appearance Model (1992), the Mound Comprehensive
Plan (2000), the 2000 Mound Zoning Ordinance Amendment Project (2000) and the Mound Visions
Areawide Alternative Review (2005). These studies, including the findings made therein, are
incorporated here by reference.
B. The Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc., together with city planning staff conducted an inventory study
of the current condition of properties within the original Project Area in 2005. The study reports of
obsolescence, land use incompatibilities, poor parcel and building configuration, and hazardous
traffic conditions for vehicles and pedestrians. A summary of the findings are found in the attached
Exhibit C.
C. In late 2004 and early 2005, LHB, Inc. ("LHB") conducted a study of building conditions in a portion
of the Project Area. That study determined that a substantial percentage of the buildings in the area are
structurally substandard as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10. Such findings
contribute to the conclusion that the Project Area is a "blighted area" within the meaning of Section
469.002, subdivision 1 I of the HRA Act. Data from the LHB Study are on file with the Authority. These
study results will also be used when considering the establishment of future tax increment financing
districts.
D. The City's Comprehensive Plan, as adopted on April 11, 2000, identified the comprehensive downtown
redevelopment project as the public's highest priority regarding commercial land use in the City.
E. Background of Mound Visions Redevelopment Program. The City committed itself to revitalizing its
downtown efforts through an effort called "Mound Visions." Mound Visions began in 1991 when the
City began to explore ways to strengthen its downtown business community. For some time, the
downtown struggled to realize its full potential, not because of the efforts of private businesses, but
largely due to the lack of image, connectivity, and pedestrian appeal. Many of the elements so important
to the area, such as natural amenities and pedestrian comfort had been forgotten. Early efforts focused
on general beautification, fagade improvements and limited streetscape improvements. Through this
exercise, the community learned it needed much more than aesthetics for a successful downtown. Mound
Visions incorporates a comprehensive approach to planning, design and implementation projects that will
involve both public and private entities.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Moi
Redevelopment
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area 1-2
Mound Harbor Renaissance Plan. The proposed Mound Harbor Renaissance (MHR) project will be the heart
of the Mound Visions Platt for downtown revitalization. The original plan established five new downtown
mixed-use districts and since that time, two have essentially been completed. The Mound Harbor Renaissance
(MHR) project will complete the three remaining districts including Lost Lake, Auditor's Road, and Lake
Langdon and will rebuild downtown as a mixed-use, pedestrian friendly environment which is oriented
towards Mound's greatest natural asset, Lost Lake, and its historic channel which extends to Lake
Minnetonka. Project goals include:
• Establishing a traditional downtown by creating a distinctive community place for Mound.
Creating a central core of traditional, multi -story "main street" type buildings with retail along the
street and office or housing uses located above.
Keeping the downtown vital by mixing retail, entertainment and office uses with a wide range of
lifecycle housing.
Offering the community new housing choices including senior cooperative apartments, urban
"rowhouse style townhomes" and loft or apartment -style condominiums.
Connecting the downtown area with new greenways, trails and traditionally designed streets and
sidewalks.
Incorporating streetscape and landscaping elements along the new mainstreet and realigned CSAH
15 corridor.
Providing central, downtown parking areas including both structured and surface lots.
Enhancing community appreciation of and access to, the area's natural resources by reclaiming the
historic Lost Lake channel and providing public dock and boat slip amenities for both residents and
visitors.
Projecting and enhancing the City's natural resources through the incorporation of innovative and
unique stormwater strategies.
+� Planning for regional transportation connections including the existing rail corridor being planned
for as a possible future LRT route and a new transit shelter to be incorporated into the Park and Ride
facility currently proposed for the True Value District.
Planning Strate ides.
Redevelopment of the City's downtown area is a recurrent theme in the approved comprehensive plan which
was adopted by the City of Mound on April 11, 2000. In anticipation of the proposed downtown
redevelopment project, a number of planning -related efforts have been undertaken by the City including the
Mound Environmental and Appearance Model which was adopted in 1992. This document was based on
the Mound Market Position which was adopted by the City of Mound on 1991. Additionally, the Mound
Zoning Ordinance was amended in 2000 to incorporate new regulations and standards for the Pedestrian,
Destination, and Linear Districts which were created to guide the City's "new " downtown.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mour_1451-ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area 1.3
Mound Harbor Renaissance Plan Review
Sketch Plan. The sketch plan for the Mound Harbor Renaissance proposal was formally reviewed the Mound
Planning Commission and City Council in August and September 2004 respectively. While the sketch plan
for the Mound Harbor Renaissance project does not include the South CSAR 110 corridor, it is important to
mention that redevelopment of this corridor is anticipated and therefore has been included in the Project Area.
A copy of the approved sketch plan of the Mound Harbor Renaissance proposal is included as Exhibit D.
AUAR. Preparation of the Mound Visions Areawide Alternative Urban Review (AUAR) commenced in
June 2004. The Mound Visions Final AUAR and Mitigation Flan was approved by the Mound City Council
on January 25, 2005.
Related Projects
s The City was awarded a stormwater initiatives grant from the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council in
October 2003 for the downtown project.
® Environmental investigation grants for the Lost Lake District, True Value District and Auditor's
Road Districts were awarded to the City of Mound by Hennepin County Environmental Services and
the Minnesota Pollution Control Authority (MPGA) in 2002 and 2004.
0 A $1.5M levy was approved for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) to undertake
stormwater improvements associated with the downtown Mound redevelopment project. The levy
will be funded over a 3 year period and includes unique and innovative strategies and programs as
outlined in the MCWD report entitled "Supplementing Mound Downtown Redevelopment with
Innovative Stormwater Management" According to the report, "The purpose of the MCWD
participation in the redevelopment is to incorporate stormwater management practices that reach as
far as possible and incorporate as many new ideas as needed to improve the quality of runoff reaching
Lake Minnetonka via Lost Lake and Lake Langdon."
The City of Mound was awarded a $1.2M Livable Communities development grant from the Twin
Cities Metropolitan Council to fund public parking in the Auditor's Road District in February 2005.
• At its March 9, 2005 meeting, the Lake Mirmetonka Conservation District (LMCD) Board of
Managers approved the City of Mound multiple dock license and variance application(s) to allow
(37) slips for the Lost Lake townhome project (subject to conditions.)
• The City of Mound submitted the dredge and aquatics permit applications for the Lost Lake
townhome project to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the Department of
Natural Resources on February 3, 2005. It is anticipated that the City's dredge permit application
will be reviewed by the MCWD Board of Managers on April 2151.
Subsection 1-3. Statutory Authority
The Authority is authorized under the HRA Act to undertake and administer the Redevelopment Plan and the
Project, and to finance Public Redevelopment Costs through issuance of bonds secured by Project revenues.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Moc_1452-°ta
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area 1-4
Subsection 1-4. Statement of Objectives
The Authority seeks to accomplish the following general objectives within the Redevelopment Project:
A. Promote the prompt development and redevelopment of property within the Project Area in a manner
consistent with the City comprehensive plan and the Mound Visions Plan and the Concept Plan, which
property is currently less productive because of substandard conditions, lack of adequate community
services, or general blight.
B. Promote the development of adequate public facilities necessary to serve the Project Area and the City
as whole.
C. Promote the concentration ofresidential and appropriate commercial development within the Project area
in order to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its prominence in the City.
D. Construct, acquire or finance any public facilities, including sanitary sewer, water, storm drainage and
roads, deemed necessary and desirable for the development or redevelopment of the Project area.
E. Assist in development or redevelopment through provision ofpublic services, environmental remediation,
soil and terrain corrections or site improvements, or land acquisition, all in cases deemed appropriate by
the Authority.
F. Employ any powers of the Authority under the HRA Act for the benefit of the Project in
such cases and upon such tenns as the Authority may deem appropriate.
G. Promote the development and redevelopment of multifamily housing in the community.
Subsection 1-5. Project Area
The Project boundaries are described in Exhibit A and are illustrated in the map attached as Exhibit B.
(AS MODIFIED MAY 23, 2017)
The boundaries of the Project Area are being expanded to include the area up to and inclusive of
the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District.
Subsection 1-6. Property Acquisition
The Authority may acquire any property within the Project Area as identified in Exhibit B, or interests therein,
as the Authority may deem necessary or desirable to carry out the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan.
Acquisition may be accomplished by negotiation or by the exercise of the Authority's powers of eminent domain.
Subsection 1-7. Redevelopment Project Financing
The Authority may establish one or more TIF Districts in the Project to finance Public Redevelopment Costs.
The Authority may also use any other revenues available to the Authority to pay such costs, including without
limitation grant funds, property tax abatements through the City under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.1812 to
469.1815, and proceeds of a special tax, if any, levied under Section 469.033 of the HRA Act.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mou1453-)ta
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area 1.5
APPENDIX A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA
MOUND HARBOR PROJECT AREA
/1::.
13-117-24-$3-0tJ
5567 SHORELINE DR
13 -117 -24.33 -flims
55M SHORELINE DR
13-117-24-33-0006
$545 SHORELINE DR
13-117-24-33-0009
5519 SHORELINE DR
13-117-24-33 10 1-
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
13-117-24.33-0011
5501 SHORELINE DR
13-117-24-33-0012
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
1 13-117-24-33-0013 '
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
13-117-24-33-00145575
SHORELINE DR
13-117-24-33-0015
�...,r, 5581 SHORELINE DR
13-1 17-24 33-0076
2300 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33-0017
2306 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33-0019
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
13-117-24-33-0020
2362 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33.0047
2316 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33-0048
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
13-117-24-33-0149
13-117-24-33-0050
5579 AUDITOR'S RD
2334 COMMERCE BLVD
13-11 24-33-0051
2348 COMMERCE BLVD
13-1'17-24-33-0052
2360 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33-0055
2380 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33-0056
2388 COMMERCE BLVD
.13-117-24-33-0057
23J6 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33-0069
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
13-117-24.33-0076
5533 SHORELINE DR
13-117-24-33-0082
2372 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33.0083
2290 COMMERCE BLVD
13-117-24-33-0091
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
13-117-24-34-
5377 SHORLINE DR
13-117-2+4.34•-0075
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0001
2321 COMMERCE BLVD
14-117-2 2
2339 COMMERCE BLVD
14-117-24-44-0003
2365 C.C7MME-RCE BLVD
14-117-24-44-0004
2345 COMMERCE BLVD
14-117-24--44-0006
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0041
2301 COMMERCE BLVD
14117-24-440042
2313 COMMERCE BLVD
14-117-24--44-0043
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mou_1,4 54 eta
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area A-]
14-117-24--4479944 1
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0045 1ADDRESS
UNASSIGNED
14.117-24-44-0046
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44 0047
AnDIRFg4 i WAAAlCluorn
14-117-24-44-0048
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0049
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED _ ,y
14-117-24-44-0051)
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0051
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0056
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0057
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0060
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-0061
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
14-117-24-44-006.2
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
23-117-24-11-0001
2434 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-24-11-0002
2425 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-24-1 1-DO03
2444 COMMERCE BLVD
23 -117 -24 -11 -OMA
,2462 COIvIME12C1= BLVD
23-117-24-11-D D05
2480 COMMERCE BLVD
23-1117-24-11-OM6
2500 COMMERCE BLVD
123-117-24-11-0009
' 2544 COMMERCE BLVD
2558 COMMERCE BLVD
232323-117-2411-0010
11-0{i2i] .... 2510 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-24-11-0028,
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
23-117-24-11-0033
2500 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117•.24-14-0007
2630 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-2_4-14-0008
2642 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-24-14-0043
2606 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-24-14-0044
6668 BARTLETT BLVD
23.117-24-14-0050
2620 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-24-14-0138
290 COMMERCE BLVD
23-117-24-14-0138
568{D BARTLETT BLVD
24-117-24-22-0001
2424 COMMERCE BLVD
24-117-24-22-0013
2400 COMMERCE BLVD
(AS MODIFIED MAY 23, 2017)
The Project Area is being expanded to include the parcels as shown below and in the map in
Appendix B.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mou_1455 _o1a
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area A-2
Parcels Currently in the Mound harbor District Project Area
053-1411724440040
053-1311724340146
053-1311724330168
053-1311724330167
053-1311724330143
053-1311724330142
053-1311724330166
053-1311724330049
053-1311724330165
053-1311724330048
053-1411724440004
053-1311724340147
053-1311724330050
053-1311724330140
053-1311724330144
053-1311724330012
053-1311724340132
053-1311724330137
053-1311724330107
053-1311724330154
053-1411724440001
053-1311724330010
053-1311724330004
053-1411724440062
053-1411724440051
053-1411724440047
053-1311724330013
053-1411724440006
053-1411724440056
053-1311724330141
053-1411724440003
053-1411724440057
053-1311724330139
053-1311724330047
053-1411724440061
053-1311724330108
053-1311724330109
053-1411724440002
053-1311724330017
053-1311724330106
053-1311724330164
053-1311724330163
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE CT
LOST LAKE CT
LOST LAKE LA
AUDITORS RD
LOST LAKE LA
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
COMMERCE BLVD
LOST LAKE LA
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LOST LAKE CT
LOST LAKE LA
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
SHORELINE DR
LOST LAKE CT
LOST LAKE LA
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
COMMERCE BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LOST LAKE CT
COMMERCE BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LOST LAKE CT
COMMERCE BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE LA
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE LA
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Moi-1456-'ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area A-3
053-1411724440060
053-1311724330128
053-1311724330011
053-1311724330014
053-1311724330015
053-1311724330016
053-1411724440044
053-1411724440043
053-1311724330009
053-1311724330076
053-1411724440050
053-1311724330090
053-1411724440049
053-1411724440048
053-1311724330056
053-1311724330051
053-1311724330169
053-1311724330138
053-1311724330052
053-1311724330171
053-1311724330170
053-1311724340149
053-2411724220013
053-1311724330057
053-1311724330006
053-1311724330005
053-1411724440042
053-1411724440046
053-1411724440045
053-1411724440041
053-1311724330083
053-1311724330055
053-1311724340148
053-1311724330020
053-1311724340152
053-1311724330019
053-1311724340151
053-1311724330082
053-1311724340150
053-2311724140008
053-2311724140044
053-2311724140132
053-2311724140043
053-2311724140007
053-2311724140050
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
SHORELINE DR
SHORELINE DR
COMMERCE BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
COMMERCE BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE CT
COMMERCE BLVD
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE LA
LOST LAKE LA
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
COMMERCE BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
LOST LAKE LA
COMMERCE BLVD
LOST LAKE LA
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
LOST LAKE LA
COMMERCE BLVD
LOST LAKE LA
COMMERCE BLVD
BARTLETT BLVD
BARTLETT BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mot_ 1457-0'a
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area A-4
053-2311724140139
053-1311724330162
053-2311724110002
053-2411724220001
053-2311724110001
053-2311724110003
053-2311724110004
053-2311724110005
053-2311724110006
053-2311724110027
053-2311724110033
053-2311724140138
053-2311724110034
BARTLETT BLVD
ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
COMMERCE BLVD
Parcels to be Included in the Expanded Portion of the
Mound Harber District Project Area
053-1411724140001 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
053-1411724140003 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
053-1411724140004 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410193 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410194 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410089 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410090 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
053-1411724440071 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
053-1411724440072 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
053-1411724440069 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724340080 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED
053-1411724440070 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410057 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410005 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410004 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410030 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410027 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410006 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410029 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410028 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410026 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724410001 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724140038 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724140037 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724140006 GRANDVIEW BLVD
053-1411724140002 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724140005 COMMERCE BLVD
053-1411724140036 GRANDVIEW BLVD
}lousing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Moun-458-ta
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area A-5
APPENDIX B
MAP OF PROJECT AREA
(AS MODIFIED MAY 23, 2017)
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mou_1459 ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area B -I
I q 11•111111•111 1 1 ill 1111111q�i;� 111;11i��p i I
Dutch Lake
C�
Harrison
Bay
Lake Langdon
�IR
I-�
I I I H) T,7,
Legend
M Mound Harbor TIF District
ME : Existing Mound Harbor District Project Area
New Mound Harbor District Project Area
Proposed Harrison Bay Senior Housing TIF District
N
0 0.125 0.25
Miles
(AL
April 26, 2017
-1460-
APPENDIX C
HKGI ANALYSIS OF BLIGHT CONDITIONS FOR THE MOUND HARBOR PROJECT AREA
Statutory Definition of Blighted Area
"Blighted area (contains) buildings or improvements which by reason of dilapidation, obsolescence,
overcrowding, faulty arrangement or design, lack of ventilation, light, and sanitary facilities, excessive land
coverage, deleterious land use, or obsolete layout, or any combination of these or other factors, are
detrimental to the safety, health, morals, or welfare of the community."
l.Dilapidation
The residential and commercial properties were constructed between 1905 and 2000. Even though these
properties, as well as the existing commercial and residential improvements constructed on them, can be
considered old, they are not considered to have any historical value nor architectural merit. Old properties,
however, require relatively higher levels of maintenance and repair. Over half of these properties can be
considered to be lacking in needed maintenance and repair.
The criterion of "dilapidation" was observed to apply to forty-three (43) of the sixty (60) parcels within the
project planning area. Twelve (12) of parcels exhibited "strong" evidence of this criterion while another
thirty-one (3 1) parcels exhibited "moderate" evidence.
a Deferred maintenance of structures and site improvements.
b Buildings and paved surfaces in disrepair
a Deferred Maintenance: Specific evidence of deferred maintenance includes:
® Poorly maintained exterior building surfaces including masonry, stucco, wood
clapboard and metal siding.
• Back yard areas overgrown with vegetation.
® Cracked, rutted paved surfaces.
• Roof system in a failing condition
• Foundation cracks, settling or heaving
• Windows & Doors: cracked, broken, ajar or boarded up.
Excluding eleven (1 l) parcels that have become part of the Auditors Road Street Right -of -Way or are
"undevelopable" lake or wetlands, seventy-two 72% of these properties (43 of 60 parcels) exhibit a deferred
maintenance pattern. In addition, individual owners would be reluctant to make the required level of
investments to their individual properties, given the context of the deteriorating nature of adjacent and nearby
properties.
Building and paved surfaces in disrepair: Specific evidence of buildings and paved
surfaces in disrepair includes:
• Masonry surfaces broken and in need of tuck -pointing
• Broken windows
• Windows and doors ajar and inoperable
• Entry stairways and service/loading docks and broken and failing
• Cracked, broken and crumbling paved surfaces
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mot- -i sota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area C -I
The twelve (12) properties exhibiting moderate to strong evidence of "dilapidation" include a wide variety
of building surfaces and site improvements in a state of significant disrepair. The obvious dilapidation of
each of commercial properties and residential properties represent a clear blighting influence on abutting
properties. In addition, the problems with windows, doors, building surfaces and pavement negatively impact
the current use and future prospects for these properties.
2. Obsolescence/Obsolete Layout
The criteria of"obsolescence" and "obsolete layout' were observed to apply to seven (7) parcels within the
project planning area, all of which five (5) exhibited "strong" evidence of these criteria and two (2)
additional parcels exhibited "moderate" evidence.
a. Dysfunctional layout of buildings and parking.
b. Substandard design of alley.
C. Dated appearance of structures.
a. Dysfunctional layout of building; and parking: All seven commercial parcels are without
adequate or convenient parking for customers or visitors based on the layout of the building
at zero front lot line. Four of the seven had no available on-site parking. Three of the seven
had limited parking which was below current standards. In addition, parking and
loading/service areas are not segregated or clearly identified.
b. Substandard design of alley: The alleys on Shoreline Blvd. and Commerce Blvd.
commercial properties are long (generally over 100 feet) and narrow. This presents problems
to easy and convenient site access and is a psychological barrier to access the front of the
business if on -street parking stalls are full. Overall the alleys represent an inconvenient and
potentially unsafe site access for the majority of parcels within the project planning area
C. Outdated appearance of structures: There is very little evidence of regular maintenance,
updating or major rehabilitation is evident on the exteriors of any of theses structures. In the
commercial core at Commerce and Shoreline Blvd. there has been only $360,000.00 of
property investment over the past 15 years. Most of this investment, as indicated by building
permit data, is for non-structural improvements. As stated in Paragraph I (Dilapidation),
these buildings "are not considered to have any historical value nor architectural merit," and
they in fact tend to serve as remnants from a past era that are not consistent with
contemporary needs and preferences of retail and commercial service uses.
3. Faulty arrangement or design
The criterion of "faulty arrangement or design" was observed to apply to twelve (12) parcels within the
project planning area. Nine (9) of parcels exhibited "strong" evidence of this criterion while another three
(3) parcels exhibited "moderate" evidence.
a. Inadequate parking.
b. Inconvenient pedestrian and vehicular access.
C. Substandard alley.
a. Inadequate Parking: Eight (8) commercial properties utilize narrow alleys for site access.
This results in a poorly functioning, obsolete parking and loading service area. The lack of
legal parking in front of the properties, due to the fact that these properties front onto a City -
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mou-1462-ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area C-2
owned right-of-way which is not used for street purposes, compounds the parking and
loading deficiencies. This situation produces a blighting influence to surrounding properties,
as commercial tenants' employees, suppliers, and customers seek out nearby parking
opportunities
b. Inconvenient pedestrian and vehicular access: The awkward and confusing parking
arrangement in the rear of buildings along Shoreline and Commerce Boulevards creates
safety hazards for pedestrians trying to, access the front doors. The ill-defined narrow alley
offers no separation between cars and pedestrians seeking to access to the commercial uses.
It is likely to present a particularly undesirable site condition in winter months during
conditions of snow and ice. The substandard design of the alley that serves as the primary
access for the majority of parcels in the project planning area (see paragraph 2. Dilapidation)
also serves as a clear representation of this criterion.
C. Substandard alley. See Paragraph 2 (Dilapidation) and Paragraph 5 (Other Factors).
4.Excessive Land Coverage
The criterion of "faulty arrangement or design" was observed to apply to eighteen (18) parcels within the
project planning area. Ten (10) of parcels exhibited "strong" evidence of this criterion while one (1)
additional parcel exhibited "moderate" evidence.
Size and placement of commercial buildings.
a. Size and placement of commercial buildings: Twenty-four (24) of the sixty (60) parcels
exhibit this criterion due to their nonconforming lot size. Twenty-eight (28) of the sixty (60)
buildings exhibit this criterion due to their relative the amount of remaining site area
available for parking, loading, and access. As referenced in Paragraph 3 (Faulty Design and
Arrangements), the placement of the commercial buildings at a zero -front -setback
exacerbates the problem of excessive land coverage because the principal access points to
the buildings are opposite the parking areas, making for difficult pedestrian connections.
5.Other Factors
In addition to the above, the following other blighting factors were evident:
a. Negative conditions within public rights-of-way.
b. Overgrown vegetation.
C. Economics of renewal/reinvestment.
a. Negative conditions within the public rights-of-way:
® The substandard design of the alley serving commercial and residential properties.
6 The obsolete design of the parking areas.
The above referenced conditions within public right-of-way represent a blighting influence the
impacts the entire project planning area. Vehicular and pedestrian access is compromised by the
substandard and antiquated arrangement of driveway cuts, paved surfaces, parking and driveways
serving the majority of parcels.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Mou_1463 ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area C-3
Overgrown Vegetation: Overgrown vegetation present on many of the parcels representing
a blighting influence consistent with the intent of the statutory definition for a blight area.
Economics of renewal/reinvestment: In addition, the physical and economic difficulties
associated with lot -by -lot, or building -by -building, renewal ofthese 60 properties lead to the
conclusion that this type and form of reinvestment is unlikely to occur. A
renewal/reinvestment scenario that would take the form oftotal redevelopment appears more
likely, more desired, and more feasible in terms of producing property design/layout and
land use mix that would be market -sensitive and would contribute to the near-term and future
health and welfare of the Mound Harbor Project Area.
Note: The full report and field data are on file in the office of Mound Community Development Director
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Moiv1464-ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area G4
APPENDIX D
MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE SKETCH PLAN (IULY2004)
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Moc_1465-ota
Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area C-5
As of May 18, 2017
Draft for Public Hearing
Tax Increment • Plan
for the establishment of the
Harrison Bay SeniorHousing
Tax Increment•
housing district) I
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the
City of Mound, Minnesota
Hennepin County
State of Minnesota
Public Hearing: May 23, 2017
Adopted:
Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105
651-697-8500 fax: 651-697-8555 www.ehlers-inc.com
-14b /-
Table of Contents
(for reference purposes only)
Section 1 - Tax Increment Financing Plan
for the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District ..............
1-1
Subsection 1-1.
Foreword ...............................................
1-1
Subsection 1-2.
Statutory Authority ........................................
1-1
Subsection 1-3.
Statement of Objectives ...................................
1-1
Subsection 1-4.
Redevelopment Plan Overview ..............................
1-1
Subsection 1-5.
Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired .
1-1
Subsection 1-6.
Classification of the District .................................
1-1
Subsection 1-7.
Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District ...........
1-1
Subsection 1-8.
Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity
Value/Increment
and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ................
1-1
Subsection 1-9.
Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued ......................
Subsection 1-10.
Uses of Funds ...........................................
1-1
Subsection 1-11.
Fiscal Disparities Election ..................................
1-1
Subsection 1-12.
Business Subsidies .......................................
1-1
Subsection 1-13.
County Road Costs .......................................
1-1
Subsection 1-14.
Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions .................
1-1
Subsection 1-15.
Supporting Documentation .................................
1-1
Subsection 1-16.
Definition of Tax Increment Revenues ........................
1-1
Subsection 1-17.
Modifications to the District .................................
1-1
Subsection 1-18.
Administrative Expenses ...................................
1-1
Subsection 1-19.
Limitation of Increment ....................................
1-1
Subsection 1-20.
Use of Tax Increment .....................................
1-1
Subsection 1-21,
Excess Increments .......................................
1-1
Subsection 1-22.
Requirements for Agreements with the Developer ...............
1-1
Subsection 1-23.
Assessment Agreements ..................................
1-1
Subsection 1-24.
Administration of the District ................................
1-1
Subsection 1-25.
Annual Disclosure Requirements . . ..........................
1-1
Subsection 1-26.
Reasonable Expectations ..................................
1-1
Subsection 1-27.
Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment ..................
1-1
Subsection 1-28.
Summary ...............................................
1-1
Appendix A
Project Description ...................................................... A-1
Appendix B
Map of the Mound Harbor Project Area and the District .......................... B-1
Appendix C
Description of Property to be Included in the District ............................ C-1
Appendix D
Estimated Cash Flow for the District ........................................ D-1
Appendix E
Housing Qualifications for the District ........................................ E-1
Appendix F
Findings for the District ................................................... F-1
Section 9 - Tax Increment Financing Plan
for the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District
Subsection 1-1. Foreword
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "HRA"), the City of
Mound (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the
establishment of the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District (the "District"), a
housing tax increment financing district, located in the Mound Harbor Project Area.
Subsection 1-2. Statutory Authority
Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or
redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes ("M.S'), Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 to
469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing
public costs related to this project.
This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant
information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbor Project Area.
Subsection 1-3. Statement of Objectives
The District currently consists of three parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way. The District
is being created to facilitate the construction of 72 units of senior housing consisting of 52 units of assisted
living and 20 units of memory care in the City. Fifteen of the units (20%) are anticipated to be affordable to
households with incomes at or below 50% of area median income. Please see Appendix A for further District
information regarding the project. The HRA has not entered into an agreement but anticipates entering into
an agreement with Harrison Bay Senior Living, LLC. Development is anticipated to begin in mid -2017 and
be completed by the end of 2018. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the
Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbor Project Area.
The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude
the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated
to occur over the life of the Mound Harbor Project Area and the District.
Subsection 1-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview
1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by
the HRA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan.
2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to
M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws.
3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary
legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may
currently own or subsequently acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to
a developer.
4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some oral] necessary acquisition, construction,
relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District.
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority 14 �
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Hark• , ..0,,,,,._
Area 1-1
Subsection 1-5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired
The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the
parcels listed in Appendix C of this TIF Plan. Please also see the map in Appendix B for further information
on the location of the District.
The HRA or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights of
way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the HRA or City only in order to
accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; acquire land for needed public streets
and utilities; carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance and/or development to accomplish the
uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The HRA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication,
condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this TIF Plan. Such
acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related
costs.
Subsection 1-6. Classification of the District
The HRA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with
M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, as amended, inclusive, find that the District, to be established, is a
housing district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11 and MS., Section 469.1761 as defined below:
M.S., Section 469.174, Subd.11:
"Housing district" means a type of tax increment financing district which consists of a project, ora
portion of a project, intended for occupancy, in part, by persons or families of low and moderate
income, as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National
HousingAct of1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title VoftheHousingAct
of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or
the regulations promulgated under any of those acts, and that satisfies the requirements of M.S.,
Section 469.1761. Housing project means a project, or portion of a project, that meets all the
qualifications of a housing district under this subdivision, whether or not actually established as a
housing district.
M.S., Section 469.1761:
Subd. 1. Requirement imposed.
(a) In orderfor a tax increment financing district to qualms as a housing district:
(1) the income limitations provided in this section must be satisfied; and
(2) no more than 20 percent of the square footage of buildings that receive assistance from tax
increments may consist of commercial, retail, or other nonresidential uses.
(b) The requirements imposed by this section apply to property receiving assistance financed with
tax increments, including interest reduction, land transfers at less than the authority's cost of
acquisition, utility service or connections, roads, parking facilities, or other subsidies. The
provisions of this section do not apply to districts located within a targeted area as defined in
Section 462C.02 Subd 9, clause (e).
(c) For purposes of the requirements ofparagraph (a), the authority may elect to treat an addition
to an existing structure as a separate building if.•
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Har04.7Q Area 1_2
(1) construction of the addition begins more than three years after construction of the
existing structure was completed; and
(2) for an addition that does not meet the requirements ofparagraph (a), clause (2), if it is
treated as a separate building, the addition was not contemplated by the tax increment
financing plan which includes the existing structure.
Subd. 2. Owner occupied housing.
For owner occupied residential property, 95 percent of the housing units must be initially
purchased and occupied by individuals whose fancily income is less than or equal to the
income requirements for qualified mortgage bond projects under section 1430 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
Subd. 3. Rental property.
For residential rental property, the property must satisfy the income requirements for a
qualified residential rental project as defined in section 142(d) of the Internal Revenue
Code. The requirements of this subdivision apply for the duration of the tax increment
financing district.
Subd. 4. Noncompliance; enforcement.
Failure to comply with the requirements of this section is subject to M.S., Section 469.1771.
In meeting the statutory criteria set forth above, the HRA and City rely on the following facts and findings:
• The District consists of three parcels.
• The development will consist of 72 units of senior housing
• 20% of the units will be occupied by person with incomes less than 50% of median income
Not more than 20% of the square footage of the buildings will consist of commercial, retail, or non-
residential uses.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that
qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes
payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District.
Subsection 1-7. Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax
increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1 b.,
the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City (a total of
26 years of tax increment). The HRA or City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2019, which is no
later than four years following the year of approval of the District. Thus, it is estimated that the District,
including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after
2044, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to
the legally required date.
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbcl14,4.1; Area 1-3
Subsection 1-8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity
Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements
Pursuant to MS., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity
(ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor
in 2016 for taxes payable 2017.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning
in the payment year 2019) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of:
1. Change in tax exempt status of property;
2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district;
3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements;
4. Change in the use of the property and classification;
5. Change in state law governing class rates; or
6. Change in previously issued building permits.
In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no
value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City.
The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2017, assuming the
request for certification is made before June 30, 2017. The ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the
District appear in the table below.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated
Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within the Mound Harbor Project Area, upon completion
of the projects within the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table
below. The HRA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its
obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2019. The Project Tax Capacity (PTC)
listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed.
Project Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion (PTC)
$237,837
Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity (ONTO)
$8,075
Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC)
$229,762
Original Local Tax Rate
1.23363 Pay 2017
Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Local Tax Rate)
$283,441
Percent Retained by the HRA
100%
Tax capacity includes a 3% inflation factor for the duration of the District. The tax capacity included in this
chart is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 25. The tax capacity of the District in year one with
partial completion is estimated to be $58,500.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the NRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its
request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S.,
Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which
building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the
TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase
the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building
permit was issued.
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1�Z'-
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbv� r _, Area 1-4
The City is reviewing the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have
been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the City.
Subsection 1-9. Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued
The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds in the table set forth in Section 1-10 will be financed primarily
through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to issue bonds or incur
other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be
financed by a pay-as-you-go note and interfund loan but reserves the right to issue bonds in any form as
authorized under the TIF Act. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal
modification to the TIF Plan. This provision does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or
City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest
of the City.
The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below:
SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL
Tax Increment $5,057,232
Interest $505,723
TOTAL $5,562,955
The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments
from the District in a maximum principal amount of $3,740,244. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-
you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total
bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval.
Subsection 1-10. Uses of Funds
Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to construct 72 units of senior housing consisting
of 52 units of assisted living and 20 units of memory care. Fifteen of the units (20%) are anticipated to be
affordable to households with incomes at or below 50% of area median income. The HRA and City have
determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project for certain project costs, as described
herein. The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around
the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment ofproperty within the District,
this TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses.
The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the table on the
following page.
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority i�Z
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harb� 7 Area 1-5
USES OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS
TOTAL
Land/Building Acquisition
$250,000
Site Improvements/Preparation
$200,000
Utilities
$150,000
Affordable Housing
$2,225,000
Other Qualifying Improvements
$409,521
Administrative Costs (up to 10%)
$505,723
PROJECT COST TOTAL
$3,740,244
Interest
$1,822,711
PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL
$5,562,955
The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total
projected tax increments for the District as shown in Subsection 2-9.
Estimated costs associated with the District (not including interest costs) are subject to change among
categories without a modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax
increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable
statutory requirements. The HRA may expend funds for qualified housing activities outside of the District
boundaries.
Subsection 1-11. Fiscal Disparities Election
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal
disparities. If the calculations pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, (inside the District) are
followed, the following method of computation shall apply:
(1) The original net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity
provisions of Chapter 276A or 473F. The current net tax capacity shall exclude any fiscal
disparity commercial -industrial net tax capacity increase between the original year and the
current year multiplied by the fiscal disparity ratio determined pursuant to MS., Section
276A.06, subdivision 7 or MS., Section 473F.08, subdivision 6. Where the original net tax
capacity is equal to orgreater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured tax capacity
and no tax increment determination. Where the original tax capacity is less than the current tax
capacity, the difference between the original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity
is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereof which the authority has
designated, in its tax increment financing plan, to share with the local taxing districts is the
retained captured net tax capacity of the authority.
(2) The county auditor shall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authorityfrom the
net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The
local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity
of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated by
the extension of the less of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (B) the original local tax rate
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1�74-
Modification to the Redevelopment Pian for the Mound Harb3ujc"t Area 1_6
to the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the authority.
The City will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b. It is not anticipated that the District will
contain commercial/industrial property. As a result, there should be no impact due to the fiscal
disparities provision on the District.
According to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3:
(c) The method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to paragraph (a) or
(b) shall remain the same for the duration of the district, except that the governing body may
elect to change its election from the method of computation in paragraph (a) to the method in
paragraph (b).
Subsection 1-12. Business Subsidies
Pursuant to M.S., Section 116J.993, Subd. 3, the following forms of financial assistance are not considered
a business subsidy pursuant to M.S., Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995:
(1) A business subsidy of less than $150,000;
(2) Assistance that is generally available to all businesses or to a general class of similar businesses,
such as a line of business, size, location, or similar general criteria;
(3) Public improvements to buildings or lands owned by the state or local government that serve a
public purpose and do not principally benefit a single business or defined group of businesses at
the time the improvements are made;
(4) Redevelopment property polluted by contaminants as defined in M.S., Section 116J552, Subd. 3;
(5) Assistance provided for the sole purpose of renovating old or decaying building stock or bringing
it up to code and assistance provided for designated historic preservation districts., provided that
the assistance is equal to or less than 50% of the total cost;
(6) Assistance to provide job readiness and training services if the sole purpose of the assistance is to
provide those services;
(7) Assistance for housing;
(8) Assistance for pollution control or abatement, including assistance for a tax increment financing
hazardous substance subdistrict as defined under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 23;
(9) Assistance for energy conservation;
(10) Tax reductions resulting from conformity with federal tax law;
(1 l) Workers' compensation and unemployment compensation;
(12) Benefits derived from regulation;
(13) Indirect benefits derived from assistance to educational institutions;
(14) Funds from bonds allocated under chapter 474A, bonds issued to refund outstanding bonds, and
bonds issued for the benefit of an organization described in section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1999;
(15) Assistance for a collaboration between a Minnesota higher education institution and a business;
(16) Assistance for a tax increment financing soils condition district as defined under M.S., Section
469.174, Subd. 19;
(17) Redevelopment when the recipient's investment in the purchase of the site and in site preparation
is 70 percent or more of the assessor's current year's estimated market value;
(18) General changes in tax increment financing law and other general tax law changes of a principally
technical nature;
(19) Federal assistance until the assistance has been repaid to, and reinvested by, the state or local
government agency;
(20) Funds from dock and wharf bonds issued by a seaway port authority;
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority �
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Hartvii l445,7, Area 1-7
(21) Business loans and loan guarantees of $150,000 or less;
(22) Federal loan funds provided through the United States Department of Commerce, Economic
Development Administration; and
(23) Property tax abatements granted under M.S., Section 469.1813 to property that is subject to
valuation under Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100.
The HRA will comply with M.S., Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 to the extent the tax increment assistance
under this TIF Plan does not fall under any of the above exemptions.
Subsection 1-13. County Road Costs
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. ]a, the county board may require the HRA or City to pay for all or
part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment
will, in the judgment of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of
road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five
years under a capital improvement plan or within five years under another county plan.
If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the HRA or City within forty-
five days of receipt of this TIF Plan. In the opinion of the HRA and City and consultants, the proposed
development outlined in this TIF Plan will have little or no impact upon county roads. The HRA and City are
aware that the county could claim that tax increment should be used for county roads, even after the public
hearing.
Subsection 1-14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF
Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA or City has determined that such
development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the
fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as
follows if the "but for" test was not met:
IMPACT ON TAX BASE
2016/Pay 2017 Estimated Captured
Total Net Tax Capacity (CTC) Percent of CTC
Tax Capacity Upon Completion to Entity Total
Hennepin County 1,573,060,731 229,762 0.0146%
City of Mound 11,214,808 229,762 2.0487%
Westonka ISD No. 277 36,551,041 229,762 0.6286%
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound HarK147Q, Area f_g
IMPACT ON TAX RATES
The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate
used for calculations is the actual Pay 2017 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based
on actual Pay 2017 figures. The District will be certified under the actual Pay 2017 rates, assuming the
request for certification is made before June 30, 2017.
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b):
(1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be
generated over the life of the District is $5,057,232;
(2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt An impact of the
District on police protection is expected. The City currently contracts with the Orono Police
Department for police services. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for
service may be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic, and additional overall
demands to the call load. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself,
will necessitate new capital investment or require that the City expand its contract with the Orono
Police Department.
The probable impact ofthe District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. Typically new
buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction.
The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The development is
not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements in the area. The current infrastructure for
sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from
the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are no additional costs associated
with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks.
The probable impact of any District general obligation tax increment bonds on the ability to issue
debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. It is not anticipated that there will be any
general obligation debt issued in relation to this project, therefore there will be no impact on the
City's ability to issue future debt or on the City's debt limit.
(3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the
amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district
levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions
remained the same, is $850,626;
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority 14��-
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbin r !c ,� Area t_g
Pay 2017
Percent
Potential
Extension Rates
of Total
CTC
Taxes
Hennepin County
0.440870
35.74%
229,762
101,295
City of Mound
0.474750
38.48%
229,762
109,080
Westonka ISD No. 277
0.207440
16.82%
229,762
47,662
Other
0.110570
8.96%
229,762
25,405
Total
1.233630
100.00%
283,441
The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate
used for calculations is the actual Pay 2017 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based
on actual Pay 2017 figures. The District will be certified under the actual Pay 2017 rates, assuming the
request for certification is made before June 30, 2017.
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b):
(1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be
generated over the life of the District is $5,057,232;
(2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt An impact of the
District on police protection is expected. The City currently contracts with the Orono Police
Department for police services. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for
service may be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic, and additional overall
demands to the call load. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself,
will necessitate new capital investment or require that the City expand its contract with the Orono
Police Department.
The probable impact ofthe District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. Typically new
buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction.
The impact of the District on public infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The development is
not expected to significantly impact any traffic movements in the area. The current infrastructure for
sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be able to handle the additional volume generated from
the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are no additional costs associated
with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks.
The probable impact of any District general obligation tax increment bonds on the ability to issue
debt for general fund purposes is expected to be minimal. It is not anticipated that there will be any
general obligation debt issued in relation to this project, therefore there will be no impact on the
City's ability to issue future debt or on the City's debt limit.
(3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the
amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district
levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions
remained the same, is $850,626;
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority 14��-
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbin r !c ,� Area t_g
(4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. It is estimated that the amount of
tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the
county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $1,807,455;
(5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any
standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and
impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional
information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax
increment financing plan.
No requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed
development for the District have been received.
Subsection 1-15. Supporting Documentation
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. I (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and
description of studies and analyses used to make the findings are required in the resolution approving the
District. Following is a list of reports and studies on file at the City that support the HRA and City's findings:
• Market Conditions Analysis and Recommendations for Downtown Mound, Minnesota
Subsection 1-16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing
district include all of the following potential revenue sources:
1. Taxes paid by the captured net tax capacity, but excluding any excess taxes, as computed underM.S.,
Section 469.177;
2. The proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, to the extent the property was
purchased by the authority with tax increments;
3. Principal and interest received on loans or other advances made by the authority with tax increments;
4. Interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments;
5. Repayments or return of tax increments made to the Authority under agreements for districts for
which the request for certification was made after August 1, 1993; and
6. The market value homestead credit paid to the Authority under M.S., Section 273.1384.
Subsection 1-17. Modifications to the District
In accordance with M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any:
1. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the District, if the reduction does not meet the
requirements of M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4(e);
2. Increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred;
3. A determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original TIF
Plan;
4. Increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the HRA or City;
S. Increase in the estimate of the cost of the District, including administrative expenses, that will be paid
or financed with tax increment from the District; or
6. Designation of additional property to be acquired by the HRA or City,
shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbv14�?jATArea 1-10
of the original TIF Plan.
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 469, the geographic area of the District may be reduced, but shall not
be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original net tax capacity by the county
auditor. If a housing district is enlarged, the reasons and supporting facts for the detennination that the
addition to the district meets the criteria of M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11 must be documented. The
requirements of this paragraph do not apply if (1) the only modification is elimination of parcel(s) from the
District and (2) (A) the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District equals or exceeds
the net tax capacity of those parcel(s) in the District's original net tax capacity or (B) the HRA agrees that,
notwithstanding M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than
the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District.
The HRA or City must notify the County Auditor of any modification to the District. Modifications to the
District in the form of a budget modification or an expansion of the boundaries will be recorded in the TIF
Plan.
Subsection 1-18. Administrative Expenses
In accordance with M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 14, administrative expenses means all expenditures of the
HRA or City, other than:
I . Amounts paid for the purchase of land;
2. Amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and
engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the
District;
3. Relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the
District;
4. Amounts used to pay principal or interest on, find a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued
pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178; or
5. Amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance
costs described in clauses (1) to (3).
For districts for which the request for certification were made before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982,
and before August 1, 2001, administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided by bond
counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. Pursuant to M.S., Section
469.176, Subd. 3, tax increment may be used to pay any authorized and documented administrative
expenses for the District up to but not to exceed 10 percent of the total estimated tax increment expenditures
authorized by the TIF Plan or the total tax increments, as defined by M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, clause
(1), from the District, whichever is less.
For districts for which certification was requested after July 31, 2001, no tax increment may be used to pay
any administrative expenses for District costs which exceed ten percent of total estimated tax increment
expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or the total tax increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd.
25, clause (1), from the District, whichever is less.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the County's actual
administrative expenses incurred in connection with the District and are not subject to the percentage limits
ofMS., Section 469.176, Subd. 3. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the
year following the year the expenses were incurred.
Pursuant to MS., Section 469. 177, Subd. 11, the County Treasurer shall deduct an amount (currently .36
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbv)AZP Area 1-11
percent} of any increment distributed to the HRA or City and the County Treasurer shall pay the amount
deducted to the State Commissioner of Management and Budget for deposit in the state general fund to be
appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting of tax increment financing information
and the cost of examining and auditing authorities' use of tax increment financing. This amount may be
adjusted annually by the Commissioner of Revenue.
Subsection 1-19. Limitation of Increment
The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the District
may be terminated if sufficient funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other escrow
account held in trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity or
redemption date.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 6:
if after four years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax
increinentfinancing distrietpursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, no demolition, rehabilitation
or renovation ofproperty or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a
street adjacent to a parcel but not installation of utility service including sewer or water
systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district
by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing
plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel, and the original net tax
capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original net tax capacity of the tax
increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently
commences demolition, rehabilitation orrenovation or other sitepreparation on thatpareel
including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the
tax incrementfznancingplan, the authority shall certify, to the county auditor that the activity
has commenced and the county auditor shall certify the net tax capacity thereof as most
recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original net tax capacity
ofthe tax incrementfinancing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions ofthis
subdivision. The authority must submit to the county auditor evidence that the required
activity has taken place for each parcel in the district. The evidence for a parcel must be
submitted by Februaiy,1 of the fifth yearfollowing the year in which the parcel was certified
as included in the district. For purposes of this subdivision, qualified improvements of a
street are limited to (1) construction or opening of a new street, (2) relocation of a street,
and (3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street.
The HRA or City or a property owner must improve parcels within the District by approximately May 2021
and report such actions to the County Auditor.
Subsection 1-20. Use of Tax Increment
The HRA or City hereby determines that it will use 100 percent of the captured net tax capacity of taxable
property located in the District for the following purposes:
1. To pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance a project;
2. To finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the the Mound Harbor Project Area
pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.001 to 469.047;
3. To pay for project costs as identified in the budget set forth in the TIF Plan;
4. To finance, or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4;
5. To pay principal and interest on any loans, advances or other payments made to or on behalf of the
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Har04 CQ� Area 1-12
HRA or City or for the benefit of the Mound Harbor Project Area by a developer;
6. To finance or otherwise pay premiums and other costs for insurance or other security guaranteeing
the payment when due of principal of and interest on bonds pursuant to the TIF Plan or pursuant to
M.S., Chapter 462C. M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178; and
7. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on
the tax increment bonds or bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Chapter 462C, M.S., Sections 469.152
through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178.
Revenues derived from tax increment from a housing district must be used solely to finance the cost
of housing projects as defined in M.S., Sections 469.174, Subd. 11 and 469.1761. The cost of public
improvements directly related to the housing projects and the allocated administrative expenses of the
HRA or City may be included in the cost of a housing project.
These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other
purposes prohibited by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4.
Tax increments generated in the District will be paid by Hennepin County to the HRA for the Tax Increment
Fund of said District. The HRA or City will pay to the developer(s) annually an amount not to exceed an
amount as specified in a developer's agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public
improvements, demolition and relocation, site preparation, administration, and other costs eligible to be
reimbursed with tax increment. Remaining increment funds will be used for HRA or City administration (up
to 10 percent) and for the costs of public improvement activities outside the District.
Subsection 1-21. Excess Increments
Excess increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 2, shall be used only to do one or more of the
following:
1. Prepay any outstanding bonds;
2. Discharge the pledge of tax increment for any outstanding bonds;
3. Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of any outstanding bonds; or
4. Return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in
proportion to their local tax rates.
The HRA or City must spend or return the excess increments under paragraph (c) within nine months after
the end of the year. In addition, the HRA or City may, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose to
modify the TIF Plan in order to finance additional public costs in the Mound Harbor Project Area or the
District.
Subsection 1-22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer
The HRA or City will review any proposal for private development to determine its conformance with the
Redevelopment Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the
following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and
electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any
other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the HRA. or City to demonstrate the conformance of the
development with City plans and ordinances. The HRA or City may also use the Agreements to address other
issues related to the development.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 5, no more than 10 percent, by acreage, of the property to be
acquired in the District as set forth in the TIF Plan shall at any time be owned by the HRA or City as a result
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harb6". 1481, Area 1-13
of acquisition with the proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178 to which tax increments
from property acquired is pledged, unless prior to acquisition in excess of 10 percent of the acreage, the HRA
or City concluded an agreement for the development of the property acquired and which provides recourse
for the HRA or City should the development not be completed.
Subsection 1-23. Assessment Agreements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 8, the HRA or City may enter into a written assessment agreement
in recordable form with the developer of property within the District which establishes a minimum market
value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the District. The assessment agreement
shall be presented to the County Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements
to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are
to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears,
in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the County Assessor shall also certify the
minimum market value agreement.
Subsection 1-24. Administration of the District
Administration of the District will be handled by the Cit}, Finance Director/Clerk.
Subsection 1-25. Annual Disclosure Requirements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subds. 5, 6, and 6b the HRA or City must undertake financial reporting
for all tax increment financing districts to the Office of the State Auditor, County Board and County Auditor
on or before August 1 of each year. M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5 also provides that an annual statement
shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City on or before August 15.
If the City fails to make a disclosure or submit a report containing the information required by M.S., Section
469.175 Subd. 5 and Subd. 6, the Office of the State Auditor will direct the County Auditor to withhold the
distribution of tax increment from the District.
Subsection 1-26. Reasonable Expectations
As required by the TIF Act, in establishing the District, the determination has been made that the anticipated
development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the
reasonably foreseeable future. In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon written
representation made by the developerto such effects and upon HRA and City staff awareness of the feasibility
of developing the project site(s) within the District.
Subsection 1-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment
1. General Limitations. All revenue derived from tax increment shall be used in accordance with the TIF
Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the the
Mound Harbor Project Area pursuant to MS., Sections 469.001 to 469.047. Tax increments may not be
used to circumvent existing levy limit law. No tax increment may be used for the acquisition,
construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for
conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government
or the state or federal government. This provision does not prohibit the use of revenues derived from tax
increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure.
2. Housing District Exceptions to Restriction on Pooling; Five Year Limit. Pursuant to MS., Section
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harb-14§9, Area 1-14
469.1763, (1) At least 80% of the tax increment derived from the District must be expended on Public
Costs incurred within said district, and up to 20% of said tax increments may be spent on public costs
incurred outside of the District but within the Mound Harbor Project Area; provided that in the case of
a housing district, a housing project, as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11, is deemed to be an
activity in the District, even if the expenditure occurred after five years.
Subsection 1-28. Summary
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Mound, Minnesota is establishing the District to provide an
impetus for residential development and provide safe and decent life cycle housing in the City. The TIF Plan
for the District was prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota
55113-1105, telephone (651) 697-8500.
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1��-
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mound Harbv , Area 1-15
Appendix A
Project Description
Harrison Bay Senior Living, LLC, intends to redevelop the parcels in the District into a mixed -income
housing project with a total of 72 units, which includes 52 units of assisted living and 20 units of memory
care. Fifteen of the units are anticipated to be affordable to households with incomes at or below 50% of area
median income. The City intends to issue a PAYGO TIF Note to offset qualified costs related to the
development of the site.
Appendix -1484- A-1
Map of the Mound Harbor Project Area and the District
Appendix -1485- B-1
NOT, nl&iii l��
Dutch Lake
Harrison
Bay
Lake Langdon
Legend
Mound Harbor TIF District
Existing Mound Harbor District Project Area
New Mound Harbor District Project Area
Proposed Harrison Bay Senior Housing TIF District
E:•
N
0 0.125 0.25
Miles
ra
April 26, 2017 CeF ft
Appendix C
Description of Property to be Included in the District
The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the
parcels listed below.
Parcel Numbers
Address
Owner
14-117-24-14-0001
Unassigned
Commerce Partnr of Mound LLC
14-117-24-14-0003
Unassigned
Commerce Partnr of Mound LLC
14-117-24-14-0004
1861 Commerce Blvd
Commerce Partnr of Mound LLC
Appendix -1487`
C-7
Appendix D
Estimated Cash Flow for the District
-1488-
Appendix D-1
H,
-,e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O 0000 0 t Om O t o
O In OOIli r O N ONO
O -NN- 00 r �- ���
C
O
N> N N N N N
my`o
U ¢ c ry K
O
U
e0'
T 00 N V 0
= OM K tor-
d
c
C d H
�
.0
E
> E
U O x
A
F
c
C:
ayw
m m
d
a�a m daa�a
O
Umoo
¢ m
a 0
m V
00000
,-• m 2 d
z
a
0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O
?
00 00 N a' O O O O D O
o 0 0 0 0
t p m N N N N N
O.� 00 dU00 00 t000 N
d C yTT TTT
_ m
d at0 t0 (.ice Ct°.- dOOU00 y
T N (0 N A
X O1 d aaaaa
@
m
d y y N 2 d O
0 0 0 0 0 0°
NNNN NN
C N COl i d
0
C d O
y U -0-.y LLL0 y 0a'jz OZ
0 0 0 0
00000
t6 itl t0 O 'O
UU V Od E N j
OM m
Ci
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Nm M M M m M M M M M M M M M M M C QN O Q Q Q V V a V C Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 000 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0
NNM M Q Q cc) c W W r nm W m m 0 0M M N NM M Q Q h N cD cp r M1 W W m m 0 0 N N M M Q Q
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
t[)�-NN�M�Q�tn� W Mrd W cnm V1 Ott>�-tn Nto Man Qtn to to W u'l M1 to 00 to m � O � M N In M cn Qtn N W W
2 2 :1 T � W �r W'�mNCNV NcvNNNc"v NN NNN
W mMh W mNrNcf1 M (fir W Or W M1QQct)MfO �-QMQ W M W n O QN O W M W O cD W W W r 0 N O N M Q
Q�Nr�-m W W W NQ U} Q O N m N cO cp N M O N O N. -M M to to W O N M Q t() to N to QQ N W W N
mQ(D W mm W rQ NhM W ONQM'7N Oc0MnCl! QnrNCO IQ
N aO N r O M MQ N.-i� Q W M U') W
N�OCQO NNMM V mu Oo 100 W MMCQ W K NN
�fM1ONnN W M UZ V't- rMm llj O N O W � M � W N I`• Nn NN
��-
NNMMQQcfS W cDrr W W mm00�-NNMMQQcn � cD W r h W W m 0 0 •-.-N N M M Q Q N cn cD W
•- �- � •- �- � •- � � � � � � •- �- � �-- �- N N N N N N NNN N N N N N
NNOONN.-�rr-M Mm [Ommhnu�v)QQnrrnQQN N M M O O �n to O O m m �n u, m m co (D m co a mm m
mmcmmm mcnNM r n uY cn Oo N- I m shm to oo OOr h N N W W W W O a 00 N N M M N W W
W W N NN �- '- � N N M 6f) LQ W F '- UJ In W W to h Q Q M M M M to N M1 r 0 0 Q Q m m In cn N N N 0 Ci
M1 h O O N N Q Q W W W W O O N N cn h r M1 m m N N cn t(� r n 0 O M t7 cp lD m Oi N N M h m m N��� m m M M I� h
N N W W W W l0 W lD W (D W r r r r r r n M1 M1 r W W W W W W m m m m m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- N N N N
6l� V' V OO NN��f� rOOOOri�M MtO (Drnnrlp W Q Q O O i�l� M M m m N cn M M S~•-�N N� cn �-
m m m m � M M cp<Dm mQQmmQQ.- W a0 W l0 cry uL cn cn W W W W O OQ Q W W QQ.-� m m W W W W m m w
00cpWmm�--M Mu7N W NOOMMcp (D W W•-- QQi�hO O M M r r O O M M n r �-.-Q Q W W N N tp lD
c� cJ cp cD W W r r M1 n r r N N W N W W W W W W m m Oi of m O> 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 .- N N N N N N M ch lh M Q
W W m m
vSNi. � v � v C.I N.Ni�ac��.M. c c M.. v �M...M. c n .M.. c .M...M...M.. as SS .Q.. v' .S .Q..---V'—.Q..v.M..
MMnhNNNN W W QQr- - W W m m-- < cD W l MMm m m m Q Q nr m m ctl u7 N N m m W W —.
OOW Wln lnW WrrQQW Wmm2 r 2 WOO.-•- m m r M1 vt of NNOOM1I W e W W rr mmQQNN
M M to ccl W W N N (O W �_ --_ n r v v � � 0 0 m m� m m � .- a Q W W M M W W k v) M M N N N N Q Q P M1
. M1 h m m M M W W W W M M W W m m N N Q Q M1 n O O Q Q M1 r O O Q Q M1 r ui cCJ m m M M M1 M1
N N M M M M Q
WM M M r W N N N n N _N O m W r M N m O M Q m cid
O n O cp m W W W N n W M N m O N O M N Q m m Q
N M M M cn W C1 O W W m M M m W m W Q
N Q W M r N r N r N W Q m cn W Q W N M O W W Q M
fD M M Q Q N m m W M1 M1 W W m O O N N M Q to � W r W
.- .- � � � .- �- .- .- r �- .- N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 o e o 0 o a o e o 0 0 0 0
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
W W W cD W li m W W c0 W W W lD W
M M M M M M M M M M th M M M M
M M M M M M M M C'i M M M M M M
N N N N ^ N N N N N N N �2 �2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M M M M M M M M M M M
W W c0 W W W W c0 W W W
M M M M M M M M M M M
M CJ M M M C'i M M M M M
cn to N O Q O O m O M1 M M O m M W r c0 W O � O m m u7 N
N N M to r W N N M_ W W W M Q m O M1 O W Q M1 O M W
m W h M1 W N cDM O N cn W n
cn O N N M M ' : Q t2 cn W W ! r W m m N N N N N
cn ui � in u> ua In rn in ui in in ui u> In cn u> cit in v> u� ui cn � in �n
n h h r r n r n r n M1 h r r M1 h n n h n r n r r n n
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
w ro ov m ro � ao m ao m m ov W a`o W ov W ro ro W m m m m m ro
O1p O O lt) m cn Q c[J N W W tC) Q W M N M O to Q Q O n
O O N o W M O m cn M clr M cDs? M1 W N W W W lc W M
N O N c() (D n W N W N OW � Q? N M Q> W
cn N N N M M N N W W r r W W m m N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o a o 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
-1491-
a
4
2
Appendix E
Housing Qualifications for the District
Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development and Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency
The two options for income limits on a standard housing district are 20% of the units at 50% of median
income or 40% of the units at 60% of median income. There are no rent restrictions for a housing district.
***PLEASE NOTE: THESE NUMBERS ARE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY. ALL INCOME FIGURES
REPORTED ON THIS PAGE ARE FOR 2017.
Appendix -1492- E-1
'���
NNIC.1IP�''��,
i1.
No. of Persons
50% of Median Income
60% of Median
Income
I -person
$31,650
$37,980
2 -person
$36,200
$43,440
-person
$40,700
$48,840
4 -person
,E3
$45,200
$54,240
Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development and Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency
The two options for income limits on a standard housing district are 20% of the units at 50% of median
income or 40% of the units at 60% of median income. There are no rent restrictions for a housing district.
***PLEASE NOTE: THESE NUMBERS ARE ADJUSTED ANNUALLY. ALL INCOME FIGURES
REPORTED ON THIS PAGE ARE FOR 2017.
Appendix -1492- E-1
••- •
Findings for the District
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the
Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows:
Finding that the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District is a housing district
as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 11.
Harrison Bay Senior Housing TIF District consists of three parcels. The development will consist
of a mixed -income housing project with a total of 72 units, which includes 52 units of assisted living
and 20 units of memory care. All or a portion of which will receive tax increment assistance and will
meet income restrictions described in M.S. 469.1761. At least 20 percent of the units receiving
assistance will have incomes at or below 50 percent of statewide median income. Appendix E of the
TIF Plan contains background for the above finding.
Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be
expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future.
The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely throughprivate investment within the reasonablyforeseeablefuture: This finding is supported
by the fact that the development proposed in this plan is a housing district that meets the City's
objectives for development and redevelopment. The cost of land acquisition, site and public
improvements and utilities makes this housing development infeasible without City assistance. Due
to the high costs of building affordable new housing in the City, the cost of financing the proposed
public improvements, costs to include affordable housing, and the insufficiency of rents in an
affordable housing development to provide a sufficient rate of return, this project is feasible only
through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer was asked for and provided
a letter and a proforma as justification that the developer would not have gone forward without tax
increment assistance.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of
tax incrementfinancing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to resultfrom the
proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the
maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the
grounds that the cost of land acquisition, site and public improvements and utilities add to the total
development cost. Historically, site development costs and reduced rents required for the affordable
units in this area have made development infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City
reasonably determines that no other development of similar scope is anticipated on this site without
substantially similar assistance being provided to the development.
3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District
conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole.
The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the
general development pian of the City.
-1493-
Appendix F-1
4. Finding that the TIF Plan for Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District will
afford maximumm opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the
development or redevelopment of Mound Harbor Project Area by private enterprise.
Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the HRA and the City will provide an impetus for
affordable senior residential development, which is desirable or necessary for increased population
and an increased need for life -cycle housing within the City.
Appendix -1494 F-2
CITY OF MOUND
HENNEPIN COUNTY
� t
Council member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN INTERFUND LOAN FOR ADVANCE OF
CERTAIN COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE HARRISON BAY SENIOR
HOUSING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Mound, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
Section 1. Background
1.01. The City has heretofore approved the establishment by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of and for the City of Mound, Minnesota (the "HRA") of the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax
Increment Financing District (the "TIF District") within the Mound Harbor Project Area (the "Project"),
and has adopted a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the purpose of financing certain
improvements within the Project.
1.02. The HRA has determined to temporarily borrow funds from the City available for such
purposes to pay for certain costs identified in the TIF Plan consisting of land/building acquisition, site
improvements/preparation, utilities, affordable housing, other qualifying improvements, interest and
administrative costs (collectively, the "Qualified Costs").
1.03, Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subd. 7, the City is authorized to advance or
loan money from the City's general fund or any other fund from which such advances may be legally
authorized, in order to finance the Qualified Costs incurred by the HRA.
1.04. The HRA intends to reimburse the City for the Qualified Costs from tax increments derived
from the TIF District in accordance with the terms of this resolution (which terms are referred to
collectively as the "Interfund Loan").
Section 2. Terms of Interfund Loan
2.01, The City hereby authorizes the advance of up to $10,000 from the General Fund or so
much thereof as may be paid to the HRA to finance Qualified Costs. The HRA shall reimburse the City
for such advances together with interest at the rate stated below. Interest accrues on the principal amount
from the date of each advance. The maximum rate of interest permitted to be charged is limited to the
greater of the rates specified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 270C.40 or Section 549.09 as of the date
the loan or advance is authorized, unless the written agreement states that the maximum interest rate will
fluctuate as the interest rates specified under Minnesota Statutes, Section 2700.40 or Section 549.09 are
from time to time adjusted. The interest rate shall be 4% and will not fluctuate.
2.02. Principal and interest ("Payments") on the Interfund Loan shall be paid semi-annually on
each August 1 and February 1 (each a "Payment Date"), commencing on the first Payment Date on which
-1495-
the Authority has Available Tax Increment (defined below), or on any other dates determined by the City
Finance Director/Clerk, through the date of last receipt of tax increment from the TIF District.
2.03. Payments on this Interfund Loan are payable solely from "Available Tax Increment,"
which shall mean, on each Payment Date, tax increment available after other obligations have been paid,
or as determined by the HRA's Executive Director, generated in the preceding six (6) months with respect
to the property within the TIF District and remitted to the HRA by Hennepin County, all in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended. Payments on this
Interfund Loan may be subordinated to any outstanding or future bonds, notes or contracts secured in
whole or in part with Available Tax Increment, and are on parity with any other outstanding or future
interfund loans secured in whole or in part with Available Tax Increment.
2.04. The principal sum and all accrued interest payable under this Interfund Loan are pre-
payable in whole or in part at any time by the HRA without premium or penalty. No partial prepayment
shall affect the amount or timing of any other regular payment otherwise required to be made under this
Interfund Loan.
2.05. This Interfund Loan is evidence of an internal borrowing by the City in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, Subd. 7, and is a limited obligation payable solely from Available
Tax Increment pledged to the payment hereof under this resolution. This Interfund Loan and the interest
hereon shall not be deemed to constitute a general obligation of the State of Minnesota or any political
subdivision thereof, including, without limitation, the City or the HRA. Neither the State of Minnesota,
nor any political subdivision thereof shall be obligated to pay the principal of or interest on this Interfund
Loan or other costs incident hereto except out of Available Tax Increment, and neither the full faith and
credit nor the taxing power of the State of Minnesota or any political subdivision thereof is pledged to the
payment of the principal of or interest on this Interfund Loan or other costs incident hereto. The HRA
shall have no obligation to pay any principal amount of the Interfund Loan or accrued interest thereon,
which may remain unpaid after the final Payment Date.
2.06. The City may amend the terms of this Interfund Loan at any time by resolution of the City
Council, including a determination to forgive the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest to the
extent permissible under law.
Section 3. Effective Date This resolution is effective upon the date of its approval.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member
, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Dated: May 23, 2017
ATTEST:
Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Eric Hoversten, City Manager
(Seal)
E•.
AFF AVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss
COUNTY OF CARVER
Tonya Orbeck being duly sworn on an oath,
states or affirms that he/she is the Publisher's
Designated Agent of the newspaper(s) known
as:
The Laker
%vith the known office of issue being located
in the county of:
CARVER
with additional circulation in the counties of:
HENNEPIN
and has full knowledge of the facts stated
below:
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of
the requirements constituting qualifica-
tion as a qualified newspaper as provided
by Minn. Stat. §331A.02.
(B) This Public Notice was printed and pub-
lished in said newspapers) once each
week, for 1 successive week(s), the first
insertion being on 05/06/2017 and the last
insertion being on 05/06/2017.
MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE NOTICES
Pursuant to Minnesota Stat. §580.033
relating to the publication of mortgage
foreclosure notices: The newspaper complies
with the conditions described in §580.033,
subd. 1, clause (1) or (2). If the newspaper's
known office of issue is located in a county
adjoining the county where the mortgaged
premises or some part of the mortgaged
premises described in the notice are located,
a substantial portion of the newspaper's
circulation is in the latter county.
4
By: `�u
Designated Agent
Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before
me on 05/06/2017 by Tonya Orbeck.
Notary Public
Rate Information:
(1) Lowest classed rate paid by commercial users
for comparable space:
$15.00 per column inch
Ad ID 684210 1 -1497-
CITY OF MOUND
HENNEPIN COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GrVEN that the City Council of the City of
Mound. Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, will hold a public hearing
on may 23. 2017, at approximately 7:00 P.M. at the Mound City Council
Chambers In the Centennial Building, 5341 Maywood Road, Mound.
Minnesota, relating to the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the,
City of Mound. Minnesota's (the "HRA") proposed expansion of the geo-
graphic boundaries of the Mound Harbor Project Area, proposed Modl-
fication to the Redevelopment Plan for Mound Harbor Project Area (the
-Redevelopment Plan Modification"), proposed Modification to the Tax
Increment Financing Plan for the Mound Harbor Tax Increment Financ-
ing District (the "TIF Plan Modification'), and proposed establishment
of the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax Increment Financing District
(a housing tax Increment financing district) veithln the Mound Harbor
Project Area. and proposed adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan
(the "TIF Plan") therefor (collectively, the "Plans"). pursuant to Minne-
sota Statutes. 469.001 to 469,047 and Sections 469.174 to 469,1794.
all Inclusive. as amended. Copies of the Plans are on file and available
for public Inspection at the office of the City Finance Dlrector/Clerk at
City Hall.
The property to be Included In the Harrison Bay Senior Housing Tax
Increment Financing District is located vdthIn the. Mound Harbor Project
Area as proposed to be expanded and the City of Mound. A map of
the Mound Harbor Project Area and the Harrison Bay Senior Housing
Tax Increment Financing District therein Is set forth below. Subject to
certain limitations. tax Increment from the Harrison Bay Senior Housing
Tax Increment Financing District may be spent on eligible uses within
the boundaries of the Mound Harbor Project Area.
Mound Harbor Protect Area
L- t_#.
L*24ftd
All Interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their
views orally or prior to the meeting Itvvriting.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MIN-
NESOTA
/s/ Catherine Pausch.
City Finance Director/Clerk
P-1,11,1-4 In
7149-8 ' -r
inlay 6, 2017
684210
j' i7
177
L- t_#.
L*24ftd
All Interested persons may appear at the hearing and present their
views orally or prior to the meeting Itvvriting.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MIN-
NESOTA
/s/ Catherine Pausch.
City Finance Director/Clerk
P-1,11,1-4 In
7149-8 ' -r
inlay 6, 2017
684210
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
Nil
Creating Places that Enrich People's Lives
M MR1116111
TO: Mound City Council
Mound Planning Commission
Mound Parks Advisory Commission
Mound Docks and Commons Commission
FROM: Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Consulting Planners
DATE: May 17, 2017
RE: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update — Spring 2017 Community Engagement
Community engagement is a means for all people to bring their voices into the process and to share their ideas,
backgrounds, and experiences to plan for a future that benefits everyone. The first phase of community
engagement for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan provided an opportunity for interested parties to express what
they liked; what they had concerns about; where improvements would be beneficial; where safety issues exist;
and how well the current vision captures what the community should be in 2040. Input was gathered by Social
Pinpoint, a map -based online engagement tool that allows community members to leave comments on specific
areas of the city via a map. Commenters were able to interact with each other by upvoting / downvoting other
comments or replying directly into a comment thread. In total, Social Pinpoint was open for comment for one
month in the spring of 2017. There were 277 comments and 55 survey responses during that time, with website
visitors spending an average of 16 minutes reviewing and commenting.
The Social Pinpoint website provided an opportunity for the gathering of detailed, site based information about
the community. This information will be used throughout the process, particularly when specific initiatives are
being identified. Staff is currently preparing a document with detailed comments that will be able for public
review. To assist with general plan directions, the detailed input has been summarized into the following set of
key findings:
• Generally, the Vision seems to capture what Mound should be in 2040, though there is some interest is
making it more unique or compelling in some manner. There is not a clear consensus on whether the
community should focus on being more of a destination for the region or a self-sustaining community
geared towards its residents.
• Features highlighted as positives include lake access, "small town feel", affordability, schools, regional
trail, library, and the commons and dock program.
• Overall appearance of community is a concern — this includes yards, homes, commercial areas, parks,
and city infrastructure (e.g. water tower and welcome signs).
• Investment and redevelopment in Downtown, as well as along Commerce and Shoreline, should be a
key focus of discussion in the Comprehensive Plan.
• Interest in park investment to replace aging infrastructure and to add new amenities like dog park,
skating/hockey rink, pickleball, splash pad, and a community garden
• While most safety concerns are in Downtown and at Dakota Rail Trail crossings, there are safety
concerns at major intersection in neighborhoods throughout the community.
Hoisington Koegler Group Inc.
123 North Third Street, Suite zoo
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 -1499
(612) 338-o800 Fax (612) 338-6838 www.hkgi.com
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN 55364
(952)472-0609
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Eric Hoversten, Public Works Director
Date: 16 May, 2017
Re: Swenson Park Tennis Court Replacement during MCES Project Restoration
Summary. Metropolitan Council is currently in progress with major sewer intercept
upgrades and renewal within the City of Mound. In particular, the Bradford Lift Station and
associated intercept realignment and replacements throughout Island Park have significantly
impacted Swenson Park. A number of residents have highlighted this impact to both Staff
and Council. While a significant functional and visual disruption to the neighborhood; this
impact also presents the opportunity for the City to work cooperatively with the Met Council
and their performing contractor to make substantially greater improvements to the Park
than may otherwise be possible under City -only funding.
Background.
The Met Council Sewer Project encountered poor soils, groundwater, wet work conditions,
and substantial quantities of buried debris in the trenching area for the new sewer alignment
around the East and South sides of Swenson Park. The collective result of these was a much
wider trench width and more excavation spoil to stockpile on site prior to either backfill or
full removal. The contractor also requested use of the park as a material and equipment
staging area for the intercept portions of the project; which was approved contingent all
restoration be completed as part of the priced work. These factors drove an impact to the
Park far beyond the anticipated trench -width across the East side and base of the hillside.
Restoration of this impact is a part of the Met Council project completion requirements. The
restoration will require further surface debris removal, complete leveling, topsoil, and turf
seeding of essentially the entire greenspace of the Park.
Elements of the work on the East side of the park required removal of the small basketball
court at that location. This work has already been completed. The replacement court has
not yet been installed. The value of this work may be better aligned in combining the court
surfaces into a single multi -use area to the west, existing tennis court location.
The condition of the tennis courts at Swenson Park renders them generally unplayable.
There is significant pavement cracking and deflection at these cracks that poses an
obstacle to play and a safety concern. Foundations for the net -posts have shifted and
are o longer sound enough to tension the net correctly. A repair or overlay of the
pavement would not perform equal to the cost of investment and is not recommended.
With the extensive rehabilitation of the park on the heels of the Met Council work,
failing to address the court conditions would be short-sighted and fail to meet
Page 2
-1501-
community expectations for both complete project delivery and the level of service
available in the park inventory with respect to amenities and their maintenance.
Generally, the cost for a new multi -court surface combining a single Doubles Tennis
court, Pickle Ball, and two half -court Basketball courts would range $130K if done as a
stand alone project. Re -assigning some of the pay items in the current Met Council
project, pay items already "sunk" in the Met Council Project (such as mobilization) and
re -guiding the currently funded restoration work to suit this outcome would offset
approximately $50K of the new -court cost leaving a City cost of approximately $80 to
replace the currently -failed twin -courts with a single multi-purpose surface.
Costs by current Contract:
Line Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit Price
Extended
Mobilization
1
LS
$4,000
$4,000
Demo Existing Courts
1400
SY
$12
$16,800
12 -in CI -V Aggregate Base
800
SY
$6
$4,800
4 -in drain the
350
LF
$7.50
$2,625
Excavation
250
CY
$15
$3,750
Seeding IVO
60
SY
$60
$3,600
Misc Landscaping
1
LS
$7500
$7,500
Subtotal:
$43,000
Engineering, admin, indirect
15%
$6,000
MCES Project Total:
$49,000
New City Cost:
Line Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended
Mobilization 1 LS $7,000 $7,000
Page 3
-1502-
Court Surface w/Color Coat
800
SY
$45
$36,000
Concrete Edging Curb
360
LF
$12
$4,320
10 -ft Chain Link Fence
360
LF
$40
$14,400
36 -in Single Gate
1
EA
$650
$650
72 -in Single Gate
1
EA
$900
$900
Tennis Net, Posts, Support
1
EA
$2,000
$2,000
Basketball Goal and Post
2
EA
$1,500
$3,000
Subtotal:
$68,000
Engineering, admin, indirect
15%
$12,000
City Project Total:
$80,000
Combined MCES, City Cost:
$129,000
Discussion.
The Contractor has thus far protected the tennis courts from project impact. Any
repairs or refurbishment of this amenity would be a City cost. The City would leverage a
specialty contractor separate from the met Council work to accomplish any of the new
work to minimize overhead and pass-through costs for the work. The work is not
related to the Met Council or current cooperative City work. Addressing this added
work as a simple Change Order does not seem appropriate.
The ball diamond outfield has been completely impacted by the project; however its infield is
in generally good condition and was protected from the impact of the work. City Staff will be
amending the infield field surface with field -lime once the area is restored and returned to
the City further improving the durability and function of this field. This should be completed
about every 3 years with light tilling and grading in the off years to ensure long-term
sustainability of the surface.
Page 4
-1503-
The playground structures and underlying mulch area for this park is in great condition and
was protected from impact during construction. This area received annual maintenance to
include inspection and minor repairs to the play structure elements and addition of certified
playground mulch to the ground -spaces. Continuation of these efforts will meet future
needs of the park.
Consolidating the court areas to the west and the newly leveled and re -seeded turf areas to
the east will allow for more functional open -pitch type play spaces for soccer and or lacrosse
team activities. This would result in expanding the spaces across the city available for these
types of activities which is presently available only at Philbrook Park.
The Parks and Open Spaces Commission discussed these options at their December 2016
meeting. The Commission agreed to the benefit of new court surfaces even if consolidation
Page 5
-1504-
to a single multi -use court was determined by financial limitations. While it is difficult to
interpret true demand from current usage because of the court conditions; it is anticipated
that a single, usable, multi -use facility would be sufficient. This capacity can be re-examined
if future use proves to exceed the predicted demand.
The Commission also concurred with re -alignment of $20,000 placed in its 2017 budget as
potential cost -share funding to improve the court at Three Points Park. Grant Dollars for that
project have not been reachable so realignment to similar, executable work at Swenson Park
re -activates this budget line item to address one of the two failed courts in the community.
Although not quite as severely failed as the Three Points Court; the distance of the Swenson
location from the court complex at the Westonka Schools campus compared to Three Points
may make Swenson a more appropriate target for replacement.
Commitment to funding replacement of the current courts is a necessary prerequisite to
engaging the Met Council on re -alignment of the current pay items in their contract and
re -shaping the restoration activities to support an outcome different than the current
park configuration. The remaining $60,000 needed to address the court was not
foreseen nor included when the 2017 budget was developed and approved. This 2017
budget shortfall amount can be initially covered through existing budget reserves which
would be restored either via any 2017 general obligation budget savings realized
through the year; or in scoping and budget -reserve decisions made during formulation
of the 2018 budget and resulting levy. Staff and the Met Council will be working
together to reduce project costs and minimize expenses during execution to the fullest
extent possible.
Council is reminded that it approved a $20,000 amendment to the Community Planning,
Professional Services budget from budget reserves in the General Obligation to fund
both 2017 and 2018 cost projections for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update in the
current (2017) year.
Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a budget amendment to re -align $20,000
from the 2017 Parks capital budget from Three Points Park to Swenson and add an additional
$60,000 from budget reserves in the General Obligation to complete replacement of the
Swenson Courts concurrent with Met Council sewer work at that location. Restoration of
funds to the reserve is to be determined in the 2018 budget and levy development process
to ensure the long term stability and soundness of the G.O. fund.
Enclosure: 8 Dec Parks and Open Spaces Commission Minutes
-1505-
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 8, 2016
The Mound Parks and Open Spaces Commission met on Thursday, December 8, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. in
the council chambers of the Centennial Building.
Present: Chair Travis Mills, Commissioners Derek Goddard and Linda Cordie, and
Council Representative Heidi Gesch
Absent: Commissioner Shawn Seiler
Others Present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten, Lead Parks
Worker Gavin Ball
Public Present: none
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
Mills asked that Item 6 be pulled from agenda as a representative from the Jaycees was
unable to attend tonight. This item will be put on the agenda for January.
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Gesch, to approve the agenda as amended. Mills, Gesch, and
Goddard voted in favor, Cordie was absent for the vote. Motion carried.
4. Approval of Minutes:
October 13, 2016 regular meeting
November 10, 2016 regular meeting
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Goddard, to approve the minutes from October 13, 2016 and
November 10, 2016 regular meetings. Mills and Goddard voted in favor, Cordie was absent
for the vote, Gesch abstained. Motion carried.
5. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present:
None
6. Discussion of Jaycees Donation and Expected Use
Item removed from agenda.
7. Identify Specific Parks and Their Use
Hoversten summarized the various tools he and Ball used to compile the parks listing in the
packet tonight. Some of these tools include Hennepin County GIS mapping, City of Mound
website, and parks listing spreadsheet. Hoversten asked for feedback on the list from the
Commission.
Mills proposed that the Commission study the list more closely. Mills asked Hoversten if the
items in the comment section needed the Commission's permission. Hoversten stated that
there were two things he was trying to capture: 1) the items that Ball and he discussed
-1506-
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes December 8, 2016
regarding the physical improvements to the parks; and, 2) the essence of what was talked
about among the Commission during the recent parks tour. Hoversten said that this list is
more of a starting point for what should come about going forward.
Hoversten said that some of the smaller items on the list have been accomplished, like the
planting of 19 fruit trees, purchase of two 2 -swing swing sets, etc. Some of the bigger items
are things that need to be researched on how to resource.
Mills believes this is a good response to the City Council's directive to come up with a
comprehensive parks plan. Gesch suggests the next step might be to categorize the parks
using the list to determine what the best "title" would be for each park.
Hoversten had a discussion with the Mayor on what to actually call these different parks.
Access, commons, etc., are really not appropriate as they imply a specific use. Hoversten
suggested that the Commission think about unnaming or renaming those things that the City
owns that are not parks. The results of this could be brought before the Council after the
January POSC meeting.
Gesch asked how many different categories there could be within the City's assets.
Hoversten suggested that after the Commission finishes with the list and categorizing assets,
this list could be taken to the Docks Commission so that they could also make determinations
on unnaming or renaming the assets. Gesch feels these assets need to remain separate from
Docks.
Hoversten and Gesch agreed that the City does not want to give the impression that they are
giving away parks to another area. All of the spaces will remain in the parks purview, but just
renamed to designate what is actually in the space, so not necessarily called a park.
Mills feels that a "view" or open space makes more sense than calling the open space an
access or commons. Gesch thinks the summary of designations should be presented to
Council just to let them know what the POSC is doing.
Mills asked about Edgewater Park. Hoversten thinks that in its current form, it is not creating
any value and Seton Park is very close. Hoversten says this lot is platted and is a lot of
record, it just happens to be owned by the City. Nothing has ever been done with it to
enhance the park. Hoversten says there has been discussion about selling this piece of land
as it is a buildable lot. Mills sees two options for this piece of land. Using it as a staging area
or for fruit trees.
Hoversten says that selling a park is a big undertaking and takes lots of different steps. Mills
suggested tracking usage of Bluffs Park and/or Edgewater Park to plan for future. Hoversten
thinks that staff would come to the same conclusion at the end of a study. If the City is going
to turn these parks into recreational assets, what is the idea and get moving on that. If the
City is not going to develop these parks, why are we holding on to them, along with
operational maintenance and insurance burden, when the City can turn them into tax value.
These questions are what the Commission was tasked with by the Council. Hoversten stated
that this is something the Commission can get community input on.
-1507-
2
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes December 8, 2016
Mills thinks it makes sense not to improve Edgewater Park at this time if City is entertaining
the idea of selling the park.
Cordie suggests that the name of Veteran's Park should be changed as it really is a 9/11
memorial and not a veteran's memorial. Hoversten thinks it would be very difficult to
change the name as some people may be opposed or offended if the City takes away any
memorial to veterans. There is a piece of steel from the 9/11 site there.
Hoversten says Jaycees donation to Surfside would come with some sort of a plaque.
Hoversten talked about the type of BBQ pads that may go into Surfside using the donation.
8. Update on MCES L-39 Project and Swenson Park Impact
Hoversten says that Swenson Park is now inundated with the impact of construction. There
will be a significantly greater degree of restoration that will be required as part of this
contract for this park than what was anticipated when project began.
Hoversten presented options for restoration of park. Hoversten suggests keeping one tennis
court, making it multi-purpose, with pickle ball lines, and a basketball court. The $20k
planned for the tennis courts at Three Points could be used here to implement the plan
shown. This park will have to be restored with contractor dollars, and the City can put in
money to help with this plan.
Hoversten says that the US Bank Safe Places to Play program could have money available for
parks. These dollars are not necessarily tied to youth sports programs. This could be a good
fit.
This park will be completely rebuilt as a part of the construction project. Hoversten is
looking at working with the contractor to demo the tennis courts at no cost, as the
contractor has the equipment there right now. Parking lot is in decent condition but the
contractor will need to dig through it, so City will receive new lot as well.
Mills has concerns with reducing the amenities down from one basketball court and two
tennis courts to one multi-purpose court where people cannot play basketball and tennis at
the same time. Mills suggests one basketball court and one tennis court would be better.
Hoversten thinks this would be doable, but will cost more. Hoversten can have both options
looked at for pricing and then determine what the Commission would feel comfortable
bringing to the Council.
Goddard asked if more could be added later. Hoversten says that yes, the City could always
go back later and buy more. Gesch said that the soccer association has funds to contribute
for using the City's parks. Hoversten says the association is looking to expand their league at
the little kids' level. Gesch says this is more fiscally sound to go with the one multi -court and
perhaps bring the extra concrete pad for basketball at a later date.
Mills still doesn't like the idea of losing amenities with just the one court. Gesch stated that
as a Council member, she would not be interested in levying for more money for an
additional space. The plan shown is better than what is there now.
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes December &, 2016
Discussion ensued about the money donated by the soccer association and if the
Commission could use that towards creating another concrete pad for basketball. Gesch and
Hoversten both said that the money donated is expected to be used for enhancement to the
grassy area for more playability for soccer.
Gesch asked about the park dedication money and if there was enough in that fund to cover
this restoration. Hoversten said there is not a lot of money in there without the Jaycees
contribution. The Jaycees will come to the January Parks Commission meeting to discuss
where they would like to see that contribution put to use.
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Gesch, to give permission for reallocation of $20,000 as
discussed and for permission for Hoversten to move forward with plans for Swenson park
restoration as drawn out in plans brought to POSC meeting of December 8, 2016. All voted
in favor. Motion carried.
9. Park Signage
Hoversten presented pictures of various park signs throughout Mound. Hoversten
recommends staying with the plain metal Mound signs with a planter bed at the base. These
are cheaper and easier to maintain. Those signs that already have a larger planter box and
are already adopted, we will leave those as is until such time as they need to be repaired or
replaced.
There was discussion about building up the Adopt a Green Space Program if the demand
warrants it. All agreed that the program needs to be better communicated to the public.
Gesch thinks that the spaces currently in the program need to look good and be well
maintained before we add more.
MOTION by Cordie, seconded by Mills, to replace wooden park signs with metal signs, and
eliminate flower boxes that have not been maintained and replace flower boxes that have
been maintained with 2'x2' boxes. All voted in favor. Motion carried.
10. Reports
City Council Representative
Hoversten recapped the Indian Knoll Manor official groundbreaking ceremony held recently.
Aeon and Metropolitan Council representatives attended. This will be affordable housing in
Mound. Developer is spending the park dedication fees on installing a playground on
property for the family units.
Gesch said that next Council meeting will approve budget. New person on Council will be the
rep for the POSC. Gesch thanked the Commission for all their enthusiasm on the Parks
Commission.
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Gesch, to temporarily reappoint Derek Goddard as Parks and
Open Spaces Commissioner until his vacant seat is filled. Gesch, Mills, and Cordie voted in
favor, Goddard abstained. Motion carried.
Commissioner Comments -
none
-1509-
4
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes December 8, 2016
11. Adjourn
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Cordie, to adjourn at 8:41 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Submitted by: Mary Mackres
-1510-
2415 Wilshire Boulevard
Mound, MN. 55364 {
(952) 472-0605
Memorandum
To: Honorable Mayor Wegscheid and Members of the Mound City Council
From: Field Officer Stewart B. Simon _4
Date: May 18, 2017
Re: Information on the Migration of Community Notification System from GovDelivery
(now Granicus) to CodeRED
Honorable Mayor Wegscheid and Members of the Mound City Council:
Beginning June 13, 2017, the City will be migrating community notification systems from our
current provider, GovDelivery, (now Granicus) to Emergency Communication Network's (ECN)
CodeRED system. Staffs decision to change from Granicus to CodeRED was based on the
improved functionality of the CodeRED system, which will allow for greater targeting when
sending messages and for emergency messages to be sent from the field via a tablet or
Smartphone, rather than from a computer or laptop. This will ensure we get the right message
sent to the right people, at the right time. Additional information on CodeRED follows this
memo.
With the migration to CodeRED, citizens will notice several changes in the look and feel of our
messaging. Our E-mail messages will have a more formal and uniform appearance,
regardless of the topic. We will have the ability to include attachments and more graphics in
the message; a feature not currently supported by Granicus. In turn, our E-mail messaging will
be more informative, providing information in one place, rather than requiring the reader to
click hyperlinks to get the data.
Because of data maximums, messages sent by text message will not be changing, as we are
limited to a set number of characters.
In addition to E-mail and text messages sent to subscribers currently receiving notifications
from the City, CodeRED will allow Staff to send emergency voice messages to all listed
residential and business landiines within the city. Residents who do not wish to receive voice
messages will have an option to "opt -out" of the service. As part of the service, ECN will
manage the database on our behalf, which includes the initial telephone number database; all
current subscribers in our GovDelivery database will also be automatically migrated to the
CodeRED database, with no further citizen action required.
To further expand our messaging reach, citizens will be able to get alerts via the CodeRED
Mobile Alert app, which is available free for Android and Apple Smartphone and tablets. Once
installed, messages sent by the City will only be received by the device, when it is located
within the city limits.
ECN will design and host a Website for the City, to explain the system to our citizens and allow
enrollment into the database. We anticipate the Website will be live and available before our
GovDelivery subscription expires.
-1511-
Over the next few weeks, we will begin testing and training on the CodeRED system. During
this time, citizens may receive telephone messages, E-mails, texts, and, if installed, Mobile
App notifications; all messages will allow our citizens to "opt -out" from future messages. We
thank our citizens in advance for their patience, as we make the change from Granicus to
CodeRED.
2 -1512-
CodeRED"
Alert, Inform, Affect Lives.
is CodeRED?
Designed to enable local government officials to record, send, and track
personalized voice, email, and text messages to thousands of citizens in minutes,
CodeRED serves as a part of your emergency management preparedness plan,
connecting residents and staff to the information thev need.
When your jurisdiction experiences any situation in which immediate c(
is required, public safety and government officials turn to CodeRED as
efficient tool to help you dissiminate information to residents, visitors, a
With enhanced precision, the proprietary CodeRED mapping
interface allows you to geo-target messages to specific
impacted audiences ensuring your notifications are not only
timely, but that they are applicable to recipients.
a Flexible Delivery System - residents may select
their preferences for types of messages and their
preferred means of communication.
a Intuitive and Easy to Use - when you need to
geographically steer your message, intuitive
mapping tools target residents and businesses
by specified areas.
® Customizable Resources - a personalized
webpage will be created to allow your
community to sign up or provide additional
contact information.
E��N 1 1-1 Emergency Communications Network, -1513-
Real Time Analytics - statistics are quickly
available to verify notifications are delivered.
Targeted Personalized Communications - the
reliable use of geospatial polygons ensures
messages are accurately targeted.
® Defined Mobile Strategy - the CodeRED Mobile
Alert app allows residents to receive alerts on
their smartphones based upon their location,
and the ECN Launcher app allows authorized
officials to create and send messages from any
device, anytime, anywhere,
866.939-0911 ( ecnetwork.com
-
.i,.r.--��.,_...J � _d-ait'Jc � ",;E_'I Ei'.'-.rri g"CrE ,r, arms C',ii•(i—;i-. C,.r rca,:uc�' , or4... -C Cof`fr nl t` .�Y• �,...
Alert, Inform, Affect Lives,
. ....... . ...A",
The CodeRED service offers an easy-to-use and highly reliable solution With severe
distinct advantages over other communication tools.
Key ifferentlators cl •
• Simple Implementation - The calling data,
mapping, and dialing system are all in place and
ready for immediate use. Clients are able to sign
up for the service and use it within the same day.
• Ease of Use - The CodeRED system was designed
to be easy to use even under the most strenuous
of conditions. Authorized users can send
messages in a few simple steps.
• Comprehensive Mobile Strategy - The most
downloaded public safety mobile app in the
nation, the CodeRED Mobile Alert app allows
residents to receive alerts on their smartphones
based on their location. The ECN Launcher
app allows authorized officials to create and
send messages from any device, anytime, from
anywhere.
Universal Ahll - To relieve inbound calling pressure
on your network, message recipients may dial the
toll-free number displayed on their Caller ID to
hear the last message delivered.
Training and Superior Client Support - ECN
representatives are available 24/7/365 to answer
any questions you may have and to ensure you
have all the tools and resources you need.
Emergency Communications Network,", _1514-
Powerful Infrastructure - No third -party shared
lines are utilized to place calls. Our triple
redundant infrastructure maintains complete
control of all dialing and calls, ensuring your
messages are delivered quickly and reliably.
Full (PAWS Integration - Unlike other IPAWS
tools on the market today, CodeRED provides
all dissemination modes through the IPAWS
aggregator and gives clients access to the secure
FEMA JITC Testing Lab.
• Notification Experience - Built specifically for
empowering critical communications nearly two
decades ago, ECN designs and delivers innovative
technology that has supported more than a billion
I I rc�11�0
866-939-0911 1 ecnetwork.com
Eraercc c,Cc,n ,n. c_at.or,J_ t o,1, D' 11 � 1,1" `"e.`I-r 'Tarr i,, ,,Iz7,,o raIf, , r"ir.r �:.- c. CCrm r.;a'' Net`_or1< C C -I ;+ 'N ..r,r ttt(, I",
s• -
Alert. Inform. Affect Lives.
Wa ;�IZA�N q
Agencies of varying sizes across the US. and Canada rely on COdeRED every
day to record, send, and track personalized voice, email, and text messages to
several thousand individuals in Just minutes. CodeRED connects residents and
staff to the information they needs When they need it.
Emergency Management
• Chemical spills and HAZMAT
incidents
• Imminent threat alerts
• Police activity and updates
• Severe weather warnings
Public Works and Utility
• Planned power/water outages
• Evacuation routes
• Street closures
• Boil water advisories
• Dam/levee breaks
• Missing and endangered children
• Missing elderly, disabled, or at -risk
individuals
• Evacuation notices
• Lockdown advisories/shelter in place
• Escaped prisoner warnings
• Sexual predator alerts
• Neighborhood crime watch support
Administration & Elected Officials
• General government information and
schedules
• Event instructions/guidance
• Voting reminders and polling locations
• Community meeting notices
Eire Department
• Evacuation notices and routes
• HAZMAT emergencies
• Gas leaks
Health Department
• Drinking water contamination
• Flu pandemics
• Viral outbreaks
Internal Communications
• First responders and dispatch
• Office personnel
• Field operatives
• Elected officials and Public Information
Officers (PIO)
emergency Communications Network`_1515- 866-939-0911 1 ecnetwork.com
r, C""OT c,caticr N,,;'nr! ECS, ai.1cn r:'Jot s "F_icr '<',;mr ars tr„c�i, .,rhso 5-:erocl”" 'im "r, G'ril Nct'-cil. L C C)J: r t t � ." dI,t:, I',- ,.(_i.
Code RED puts you in complete control.
No matter where you are, you can target
your message precisely to the people you
want to reach, delivery the message you
want to send, via the channels you want
to use. It is quick, easy, and efficience and
can be used whenever you feel that it's
appropriate.
Emergency Communications Network�
1516-
Example
applications
ItSevere weather warnings
(floods, hurricanes, blizzards, etc.)
Street closures and traffic
updates
-A 10, Terrorist threats/bomb alerts and
ISO warnings
# Utility outages and updates
(water or electric)
Viral outbreaks and pandemics
Water boil advisories
NIL
866-939-0911 1 ecnetwork.com
Dam/Levee Breaks
Dangerous individuals on the
loose, active shooter
Evacuation Notices and routes
Fraud or scam alerts
General information
(meetings/elections/reminders)
Garbage pickup changes
Gas leaks
Hazmat emergencies
Medicine/prescription/electronic
drop-off event notices
Missing child/persons alerts
Mosquito spraying details
Mudslides
Neighborhood crime watch
support
ItSevere weather warnings
(floods, hurricanes, blizzards, etc.)
Street closures and traffic
updates
-A 10, Terrorist threats/bomb alerts and
ISO warnings
# Utility outages and updates
(water or electric)
Viral outbreaks and pandemics
Water boil advisories
NIL
866-939-0911 1 ecnetwork.com
Alert. Inform. Affect Lives,
Plyrnouth County Sheriff's
«,Department
Missing 12 -year-old found after CodeRED alert
Carver, MA (March 2016) - A frantic father reported
his 12 -year-old son missing to the Carver Police
Department. The young boy had already been
missing for two hours when the call was received.
Carver Police Department responded immediately,
checking the boy's friend's homes and preparing for
a search in a nearby wooded area. Plymouth County
Sheriff's Department promptly sent out a CodeRED
notification on behalf of Carver Police Department
to residents alerting them of the missing child. A
woman subsequently informed her husband of the
alert and he took his ATV out into the woods to assist
in the search. Miraculously, the young boy was found
only a half -mile away from his home and reunited
with his father.
Richfield City Police
Department
CodeRED alert helps find missing 8 -year-old within
minutes
Richfield, UT (March, 2016) - An 8 -year-old boy
was reported missing in the Richfield area around
after he never returned home from school. The boy's
parents reported him missing around 6pm. The
Richfield City Police Department issued a CodeRED
alert in the area providing a description of the boy
and asking residents to call in with any information.
Sheriff Nathan Curtis used ECN Launcher to send
Emergency Communications Network"' _1517 -
the alert in only a few minutes. Within five minutes,
three people had called to report the bogy's location.
The boy was returned home safety to his family. "The
Launcher app is so easy to use I have launched SAR
callouts from hundreds of miles away and it works
flawlessly," Sheriff Loftis said. "I know it takes much
less time than going online. And in these situations,
every second counts. Thank you for getting the ECN
Launcher app!"
$N FFI�
Green
1
Sheriff'sDepartment
Local missing man found after police send
CodeRED alert
Green Lake County, VVI (April 2016) - A 20 -year-
old man with cognitive disabilities was reported
missing around 4pm after wandering away from his
home. Local police departments organized a search
along with the man's family in places the man would
be familiar with. The Green Lake County Sheriff's
Communication Center then sent a CodeRED alert to
neighboring residents, which generated a reported
sighting of the individual. Police were able to locate
the man and return him to his family. Sheriff Mark
Podoll of Green Lake County Sheriff's Department
said, "All of those who helped, specifically the Green
Lake/Brooklyn Fire Department and DNR Aircraft,
did a great job last night. I credit the Friday morning
recovery of the subject to our use of Code Red and
the citizens who took the time to help."
ecnetwork.com
"0,1 �<`!� . a, n `r -I 1Ve.,'I .i ttr i 1- nuc i ri:'z . r . i^,a C0ir,. i .<a, !el. C Cop , I t
Alert, Inform, Affect Lives.
■
Cass County Emergency
Management
CodeRED kept citizens safe during a neighborhood
shooting
Fargo, ND - A man in North Fargo put members of
the community in danger during a domestic violence
incident. On a cold February 2016 evening, a young
boy called 911 dispatchers and reported a domestic
disturbance, saying a man had fired a gun at his
mother, the suspect's wife. When Moorhead Police
Department officers arrived at the scene, the suspect
began firing at the responding officers. Police
swarmed the area and set up a perimeter around
the suspect. Authorities sent out multiple CodeRED
alerts to residents in the nearby area, telling them to
shelter in place and avoid going outside. Once the
firing stopped, the police found the suspect dead
inside his home. Unfortunately while there was loss of
life, including that of a first responder killed in the line
of duty, no one else in the neighborhood was harmed
and the Moorhead Police Department attributes
CodeRED with preventing innocent bystanders and
community members from being injured,
Creensville County
Sheriff's Office
Murder suspect found courtesy of CodeRED
Greensville County, SC - "The more community
involvement that we have the more effective we are.
We first implemented the CodeRED system in 2013,
and it's been used 44 times since then, reaching
242,000 people with seventy-five percent of the calls
Emergency Communications Network` _1515 -
regarding missing or endangered people. CodeRED
notifications get results. For instance, we sent an
alert on August 31, 2015 after a woman was found
stabbed to death in her Simpsonville home, and as
a result, we were able to charge the woman's son in
the crime. This powerful technology alerts people in
nearby communities when deputies are searching for
missing persons or suspects and is a game -changer.
Our communication capabilities have grown, all for
the better and it continues to just getting better and
better."
Martinsville -Henry County
911 Center
dangerous ,
Henry County, VA—"Getting information out to the
public through the CodeRED system is what led to
the capture of this dangerous armed person. Within
a couple of hours of our CodeRED alert going out,
and the continuance of the (PAWS alert in the area,
citizens identified the suspect as he walked up to a
convenience store trying to blend into society and
asking for a ride. Within seconds our 911 Center
received three different calls reporting the location of
the suspect we were looking for, and officers quickly
responded and took the suspect into custody.
Without the ability to quickly inform the public of the
emergency situation at hand through the CodeRED
system and IPAWS integration, we would have likely
not captured this suspect that night."
TO LEARN MORE,
ecnetwork,com
Er.ti,Ci,E icy Cori ,x ca' ct , i ,, I - EC 4 ..i 4'Jc' 1_,`I ici ..n rc' i;; ', _r ,Is o' Erie, _
_ Curr�r-�r Caher,<'Jet orl<. _�. Cc�;.�i -p i ct t reser.cc;
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 13, 2017
The Mound Parks and Open Spaces Commission met on Thursday, April 13, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the
council chambers of the Centennial Building.
Present: Chair Travis Mills, Commissioners Jody Smith and Shawn Seiler, and Council
Representative Jeff Bergquist
Absent: Commissioner Linda Cordie
Others Present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten, Administrative
Assistant Mary Mackres, and Parks Dept Lead Worker Gavin Ball
Public Present: none
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Bergquist, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
4. Approval of Minutes:
March 9, 2017 regular meeting
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Bergquist, to approve the minutes from March 9, 2017
regular meeting. Bergquist, Cordie, Mills, and Smith voted in favor, Seiler abstained. Motion
carried.
S. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present:
none
6. Preliminary Budget Discussion
Hoversten will start budget sequence with Item 8, Park Tours. In looking at parks, if there are
things that are consistent with existing amenities at parks, make special note to go back out
and assign dollar figures against those items. Discoveries from these park tours and the
discussion at the POSC May/June meetings will be what Staff will put into budget from the
City's perspective. Hoversten says that having this list will help to manage the total cost
perspective. Choices must be made as to what will or will not be done in the parks from the
budget perspective. Hoversten reminded the Commissioners that last year, Staff brought
forward a list of titles with dollar amounts associated with those. That budget process
produces a preliminary budget that goes to Council in late August with another submission to
Council in September. After that, there is a discussion in a workshop session in November,
with budget adoption in December for January 2018 expenditures.
In the parks budget, Staff will take care of equipment and capital equipment replacements.
Staff will take the operations and maintenance dollars that were used in past and make
-1519-
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes April 13, 2017
adjustments from what was learned in the past. Small scale capital improvements should
come out of park tours.
Hoversten said that two things should come out of the budget process. One is how to
financially structure contract or restoration to Swenson Park and how the City might
incorporate City dollars to come away with a fully refurbished park with tennis courts.
Hoversten has asked the consultants who are doing the comprehensive plan updates to
include a development plan for Surfside Park. Surfside is the most intensive and costly from
a planning perspective; all other parks would be cheaper than Surfside. Surfside is the most
focal park and also the most visible. This is also the park where most groups want to make
additions. Hoversten feels that Surfside is the park that the City should have a strategic
vision for.
Bergquist asked the status of the proposed shelter at Surfside Park. Hoversten said that the
Jaycees' contribution doesn't cover construction of the style and size that the Jaycees want.
Therefore, the contribution money is sitting in the parks dedication fund. At some point, the
Jaycees can add to that sum of money and then the City can move forward with the size and
scale of the project the Jaycees want to have.
Mills asked about page 12 list of parks with map. Mills says there are comments with
improvements shown there and Mills assumes that not all of those improvements can be
done at once. Hoversten says the Commission needs to prioritize the list. This list is a
summary of ideas that Staff has thought of for parks. Hoversten says this is the first draft of
a "closed room" park improvement concept plan to be brought out into the open. This was
included in tonight's packet so Commissioners could see which parks aren't parks anymore
and to get the Commission to think about what these parks could be.
Mills stated that when the Commissioners are on the parks tours, the last page of the
checklist includes a comments section. Mills suggests that the Commissioners put down
their overall vision for that park. Many residents have brought forward ideas to Hoversten.
Hoversten encourages the Commissioners to look at the space and figure out what it might
be good for. Hoversten says that the City already has a substantial inventory of developed
parks.
Hoversten says the preliminary budget will be developed based on the information brought
back at the May POSC meeting and again discussed at the June meeting. POSC will review
again after the summer break.
Mills asked about the planners working on Surfside Park. Hoversten said that the dollars that
are committed to the 2018 budget include money for the planners to lead us through the
planning process to come up with a development strategy for Surfside Park. This strategy
will include what the Jaycees want and how that fits in with the other amenities already at
the park. Hoversten suggests that at some point, ideas and suggestions need to stop. Once
Staff has a list, they can move forward element by element as dollars are available and have
a strategy for park improvements.
-1'520-
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes April 13, 2017
7. Adopt A Green Space Brochures and Coupons
Mackres presented a draft for 10% off coupons to be used with the Adopt A Green Space
volunteers at Mound True Value and Johnny's Garden Center. She questioned how the
coupons should be implemented and what the parameters were - one-time use, expiration
date? Mackres informed the Commission that applications for Adopt A Green Space were
sent to last year's volunteers in hopes that they would sign up for the program again.
Smith stated that not all the parks have flower boxes and what do people do if there was not
a flower box in the park. Mackres said that the adoptable spaces were pared down and the
parks were combined with the upkeep of the flower boxes.
Hoversten asked that the Commissioners make a note of the condition of the park signs
and/or flower boxes while they are doing their park tours. Hoversten also suggested that the
City could let Johnny's know that the coupons would be limited to flowers and plants and
would not include trees.
Bergquist asked how the adopters would identify themselves at the retailers in order to
receive the discount. Various ideas were discussed on how to implement the discount
program. Smith mentioned that the Garden Guild members have a membership card which
allows them a discount at various retailers. Mackres will check with True Value and Johnny's
to see how they would prefer to handle the discount program.
Mills asked about the Adopt A Green Space brochures and how they were going to be
distributed. Mackres said that she will have a City staff member drop them off at Johnny's
and True Value. Seiler asked for an electronic version of the brochure so that he can put on
his Facebook page. Smith reminded all that this is on the City's website under "parks."
Smith asked whether or not the Westonka Community and Commerce (WCC) still had funds
available for a dog park. Smith said lots of people have approached her about dog parks.
Hoversten knows that the WCC continues to do Dog Days but is not sure if the WCC is
holding funds for a future dog park.
Hoversten suggests that the POSC needs to work through the process and formulate pieces
of the survey into a cohesive product. Hoversten thinks that by the time the City gets
through the strategic plan for Surfside Park and the money needed for the Swenson Park
tennis court issue and restoration, the Council will not really be amenable to any more levy
increases.
After the budgetary process for the comprehensive plan, the City can bring forward the ideas
for the dog park plan. Bergquist mentioned that Doone Park would be a perfect location for
a dog park.
Seiler thinks the Commission can use the Mayor's own words in bringing the process along as
it sounds like the Mayor is trying to stir interest in parks. Seiler doesn't think it would be too
difficult to create a dog park. Hoversten responded that it depends on how intense you want
to take the amenity. Hoversten asks where to start and where to end. Start small and build
on that. Get feedback from frequent users. Responding to feedback is great, shows the City
-1521-
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes April 13, 2017
is receptive. Seiler asks what is stopping us from building it now? Hoversten says that Doone
Park is encumbered by the street improvement project right now.
Seiler is thinking of current open spaces that could be used now to start a dog park.
Scherven and Avalon are examples. Seiler thinks it would be very simple to create a dog
park. Bergquist commented that the Boy Scouts are always asking to do projects in town.
Could this be something they could take on? Hoversten says that there are mixed results
from that.
Seiler suggested people pay an annual fee to use the dog park. Hoversten mentioned that
some people aren't happy about paying for the dog park in Orono.
Hoversten says there is much discussion about dog parks, for example, should there be more
than one in the area? Doone Park is a great location, but is it the right location for the first
dog park? Highland Park is also nice for dogs as the terrain is not well suited for a sports
field.
8. Park Tour Assignments
Mills explained the concept of the parks tours. Commission divides up the list of parks and
makes comments on forms. Mills reminded the Commissioners to take pictures. At the next
POSC meeting, Commissioners will discuss their findings. On page 12 of the packet, there is a
list of parks and their feature amenity.
Hoversten reminded the Commissioners that there is a shoreline restoration and a storm
sewer project at Carlson Park that will address the shoreline eastern corner and will add a
non -powered personal watercraft landing area on the shoreline western corner. There will
be a pedestrian trail that meanders through the storm water features and provides direct
access to the dock.
Seiler asked if anyone has talked about providing locking racks for kayaks, for a fee.
Hoversten will pitch the idea to the Docks Commission. Hoversten has also seen a rent -a -
kayak, similar to the bike rentals of Nice Rides. Hoversten thinks this could also work at Lost
Lake Park.
Hoversten says that there is also a shoreline restoration project at Highland End Park. Mills
asked which park improvements are already on the budget. Hoversten says that the
snowmobiling club did not mark the trail this year at Highland End. If they do not want to
use it, then it would be ok to leave it as a sledding hill.
Ball encouraged the Commissioners to get creative with ideas of what to do with parks and
take a broader view.
9. Reports
City Council Representative
Bergquist summarized that the Council meeting covered disaster response training. Start at
local level, then county, state, and federal.
-1522-
Mound POSC Meeting Minutes April 13, 2017
Commissioner Comments -
Hoversten says the Council approved a change to ordinances for people who are on the
Commissions who move out of the community, allowing them to serve out the rest of the
calendar year if they so choose. Seiler is moving and the Commission will be looking to
replace his position. Seiler says he is willing to stay on through the end of the year.
Hoversten says that the City must go through the full advertisement process anyway when
there is an opening on a Commission. Hoversten says that giving Staff time to search would
be better, allowing Staff to provide a pool of applicants in November and seat someone in
December.
10. Adjourn
MOTION by Mills, seconded by Bergquist, to adjourn at 8:09 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion
carried.
Submitted by: Mary Mackres
-1523-
MINUTES
MOUND • PLANNING COMMISS101
APRILi
Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode,
David Pelka (7:02), Jake Saystrom, Jameson Smieja, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jennifer
Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner
Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander.
Members of the public: Dan Zellmer, 2544 Commerce Blvd; Pat Salden, 5960 Ridgewood Rd;
Jason Biddle, 1833 Shorewood La; Blake Hopkins, 901 N 3rd St, Mpls.
MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried
unanimously.
REVIEW OF MARCH 7, 2017 MEETING MINUTES
MOTION by Smieja, second by Saystrom, to approve the March 7, 2017 meeting minutes as
written. MOTION carried unanimously.
PLANNING CASE NO. r,
2 -LOT MINOR SUBDIVISION
1833 •• ••D LANE
•
Smith presented the planning report for the minor subdivision request. Highlights of the report
are as follows:
• Two lots are proposed from three existing.
• The house was on lot 5 was demolished.
• Lots created by a minor subdivision are not eligible for lot of record status. Hardcover
will be 30%. Front setback will be 20 feet, sides 10 feet and rear 15 feet.
• No variances are being requested.
• Park dedication will be required. Staff is recommending payment of $1,100 minor
subdivision park dedication fee for 1 new lot.
• An MCWD permit will be required to address erosion control and drainage issues.
• Fees to be charged for the newly created lot are: Park Dedication; MCES SAC charge;
water and sewer trunk fees; water and sewer connection fees
• Standard utility easements will be required.
• The request is consistent with the zonir.1524: and regulations for the district.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 4, 2017
Velsor asked if there was sewer and water infrastructure available to the lot. Public Works
Superintendent Hanson confirmed that there were stubs to each lot.
Bussey pointed out that there were significant elevation differences on the adjacent Lots 6-8
and wanted to know if there would be two lots or three. Smith stated there was house
previously located on Lots 6-8 that was demolished several years ago. Biddle stated there are
plans for only one house.
MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to recommend approval with conditions 1-23, striking
condition no. 18, and findings of fact 1-4. MOTION carried unanimously.
PLANNING CASE NO. 17-05
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT
2544 COMMERCE BOULEVARD APPLICANT: DAN ZELLMER / SURFSIDE BAR & GRILL
Smith presented the planning report for the conditional use permit amendment request.
Highlights of the report are as follows:
• The three parcels were combined in 2014-15
• In the original approval, the addition of an outdoor patio required a modification of the
CUP
• The plan is for a 32 seat outdoor patio area for dining
• A letter was received today from the adjacent property owner outlining concerns about
hours and volume of music
• The code chapter referenced on page 1 of the planning report is the old code and was
been modified in 2015/16. The 50% food sale requirement is no longer code
• No fire code or life safety issues were identified during review
• MCWD indicated that the applicant is working with them
• Planned separation of post and rope is deemed acceptable by staff
• Class III liquor is allowed in the B-1 zoning district
• Hours of operation will be Monday -Thursday 3-11; Friday/Saturday 11am-12am; Sunday
11am-9pm
• There will be no live music on the outdoor patio
• Some parking spaces will be eliminated; parking will be conforming post construction
• The MCES shall be contacted for SAC charges; requirements of the building and fire code
must be met
• CUP requires a public hearing at the council level
• Staff recommends approval subject to conditions and findings of fact outlined in the
planning report
Goode questioned the location of the letter writer's home. Smith stated that it is immediately
to the north of the subject property.
Saystrom asked if there were lighting requirements in the original CUP. Smith said that the
original CUP did not address lighting as outdoor activity was not part of the request.
-1525-
Planning Commission Minutes
April 4, 2017
Bussey asked if there would be noise protection for neighbor. Smith was uncertain whether
additional research would be required.
Smieja asked about property owner rights regarding noise. Smith stated that the restaurant is
required to operate within the limits of the CUP. If they are not adhered to, the Council could
revoke the CUP.
Smieja asked if outdoor music would be allowed by the CUP. Smith said that the current CUP
referenced live and pre-recorded music. It is not clear if it was allowed for outdoor as well as
indoor. If it is found to be outside the current scope, it is suggested that it be included in the
current scope, if we are going to allow it, so it can be managed.
Smith commented that this is a commercial district. The residential uses in the area are lawful
non -conforming and their rights as homeowners need to be protected. Smith confirmed that
the property across the road is commercial.
Smieja mentioned that often outdoor patios end up with roofs for protection for smokers.
Some discussion about the Clean Air regulations took place.
Dan Zellmer — 2544 Commerce Blvd — indicated that, if he had been aware that the noise was
annoying, he would have addressed their concerns. The neighbors thought that the patio was
going on the rear of the building. Mr. Zellmer had a conversation with Mr. Sletten that
addressed some of the issues. There is no plan to add a canopy and the door in that area will
continue to be an access point.
Bussey asked if there are currently speakers outside. Mr. Zellmer said there are, but they have
the ability to turn them down.
Smieja questioned whether staff had looked at other cities regarding hours of operation.
Staff commented that the CUP allows a revision if something is not working.
General discussion ensued regarding operational issues (i.e., noise, smoke, etc.) and the ability
to revisit the CUP.
MOTION by Saystrom, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit
amendment subject to conditions 1-10 and findings of fact 1-4. MOTION carried unanimously.
PLANNING CASE NOS. 17-07 AND 17-08
CONDITIONAL
2020 COMMERCE BOULEVARD / 5524 SPRUCE ROAD APPLICANT: BLAKE HOPKINS/AEON
Trapp reviewed the planning report for the CUP amendment and variance requests. Highlights
include:
• This is related to previous approvals from 2016.
-1526-
Planning Commission Minutes
April 4, 2017
• Original Storm water management system used permeable pavers in the parking lot and
rain gardens throughout the site to treat the runoff from the townhomes. However, it
was determined that the runoff from the original apartment building also needed to be
treated, thus requiring the change in plan and approvals.
• The approach they are taking uses impervious material for the parking areas and an
underground handling system to collect and treat the water.
• The change also addresses managing the quantity of stormwater as required by the
MCWD.
• No new variances related to setbacks; only impervious surface requirements. Any time
there are changes to the site plan, a review of the CUP is required.
• Public hearing is required at the City Council.
• Condition No. 3 was revised into No. 2 and the reference to condition No. 3(d) should be
3(h).
• The plan meets MCWD requirements.
Saystrom said it seemed that the underground system was effective enough that we removed
some permeable surface.
Smieja asked why the permeable pavers and natural rain garden filtering wasn't as effective as
the newly planned system.
Blake Hopkins, Senior Project Manager with Aeon, stated that the change is as a result of the
watershed requirements. The original plan met the requirements for the new construction on
the townhomes, but the water coming off the original building was not being treated
adequately per the MCWD. All the water is controlled through the underground tank and
expanded rain gardens.
Ray Hanson, Public Works Superintendent, said that the existing building did nothing to treat
the runoff. This plan treats quite a bit of the original water as well.
Saystrom asked if the sand pit is maintainable. Hanson indicated that it is built to be serviced
about every 3 to 5 years.
Smith explained that the plans must be engineered and reviewed by a professional engineer.
The MCWD requirements relate to the type of property, size, best management practices, rate,
and quality improvement. All those factors determine the type of system that needs to be
designed. Residential may be only erosion control. Commercial projects trigger other
requirements that are very specific.
Smieja asked what happens if a deluge overflows the system. Smith related that both the
Director of Public Works and the City Engineer reviewed the plans and the findings were
communicated to Aeon when everything came back from the MCWD.
A discussion ensued regarding the ability to manage the storm water structure through the CUP
review process, i.e., if the capacity is inadequate, if the site configuration is changed, etc.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 4, 2017
Smieja asked about the ability to request a Public Lands Permit to develop within the utility
easement that is on the property. Smith responded that the easement belongs to Xcel Energy
and not the City of Mound. The City cannot authorize work in someone else's easement.
MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to recommend approval of the amended CUP granted in
Resolution 16-82 and variance to allow impervious surface coverage over the 40% maximum
with condition 1, condition 2 modified to No. 3 (h) striking condition 3, and including conditions
4 and 5 as recommended by staff and findings of fact 1-3. MOTION carried unanimously.
PLANNING CASE NO. 17-09
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
5468 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD APPLICANT: RAY HANSON / CITY OF MOUND
Smith reviewed the planning report for the conditional use permit request. Highlights include:
• Propose construction of a 44 feet x 48 feet membrane storage facility on east side of the
property
• Zoned industrial; industrial uses in several areas; Xcel facility on the west and Balboa
Business Center to the east
• Essential service structures are allowed in all districts; setbacks and standard zone
requirements are waived
• Allow structure by CUP; public hearing and notice to property owners within 350 feet
• Notice was mailed to adjacent property owners; no comments have been received
• HCRR responded with no comments
• White fabric keeps the interior cooler and maximizes light
• Storage inside cleans up the site and makes maintenance of the area more manageable
Baker asked if there were height requirements. Smith stated that the top of the arc is 24 feet.
The industrial district regulations in the code do not include a height limitation; however,
residential height limit is 35 feet.
Pelka wanted to know if there was a long term plan for permanent structure. Hanson said
there was nothing planned. It was set up so that, if we should have to move it, it wouldn't be a
large investment.
Saystrom asked what triggered need for CUP. Smith said that the building triggered the review.
In all districts there are definitions for essential service buildings and they are processed as a
conditional use.
Goode was curious about the cost of the structure. Hanson said it was $45,000, engineered,
built, and signed -off.
Smieja asked about hardcover. Smith replied that gravel counts because of compaction; this is
hardcover over hardcover.
Planning Commission Minutes
April 4, 2017
Ray Hanson, PW Superintendent said that the structure will be a half moon, fully enclosed front
and back with a front door, and engineered footings.
Smieja questioned what type of materials will be stored in the building? Hanson said that
several generators need to get out of the elements and will be stored inside. The plan is to get
the building up, build the block walls inside, and then decide specific items to store. The
planned lot was used to park semi trucks so it was paved and is well compacted. We have cut
that area out and leveled it off and will be paving inside.
MOTION by Baker, second by Goode, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit
with conditions 1-9 and findings of fact 1-3. MOTION carried unanimously.
Old/New Business
A. Update on 2040 Mound Comprehensive Plan Project
Trapp gave an overview of the Comp Plan community involvement piece available on the
website.
B. Staff / City Council Liaison Report / Update
• Serenity final plat application has come in. Staff is meeting with Minnetrista staff to
coordinate issues.
• Trident final plat submittal expected soon. Trident is requesting establishment of an
HRA housing district.
• Summer edition of newsletter is underway
• A lot of special event permits have come in
• Nuisance and exterior storage monitoring
• Emergency Management training with Joe Kelly
Smieja also attended the emergency management training. It was clearly directed to
municipal personnel. Smieja gave kudos to Stewart Simon for the advanced planning and
efforts to prepare the city for emergencies.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION by Penner, second by Goode, to adjourn at 8:55 pm. MOTION carried unanimously.
Submitted by Jill Norlander
I Mo a