Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
79-02-13
CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota AGENDA CM 79-56 CM 79-58 CM 79-50 CM 79-53 CM 79-51 CM 79-52 CM 79-59 CM 79-55 CM 79-57 CM 79-54 Mound City Council February 13, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. Public Hearings A. Vacation of Hanover and Drummond Roads Pg. 452-453 B. Continued Hearing on Commerce Boulevard Improvement Pg. 451 2. Planning Commission Recommendations Pg. 429-450 3. Prosecuting Attorney Pg. 428 4. Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) Tax Forfeit Land A. Easement - Lot 25, Block 6, Woodland Point Pg. 427 B. Park - Lots in Block 28, Seton Pg. 425-426 Licenses A. Taxicab Renewal Pg. 419-424 B. License and Permit Fees Pg. 418 7. Gambling Ordinance Amendment Pg. 415-417 8. Consulting Services Pg. 414 9. Payment of Bills 10. Information Memorandum/Misc. Pg. 374-413 11. Committee Reports Pg. 454 2-13-79 CITY OF MouND Mound, Minnesota February 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-58 SUBJECT: Continued Publi~ Hearing - Commerce Boulevard Improvement On January 23rd the City Council continued the Public Hearing to Improve Commerce Boulevard from Bartlett Boulevard to Cook's Bay and the adjoining parking lot by constructing concrete curb and gutter and blacktop street and parking lot until February 13o The estimated cost of the project is $51,290. " ........ L6onard L. K°pp / t 3-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 2, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-50 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendations Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes. The following items require Council action: Item 2. Subdivision of Land Lot 42 and 43, Mound Shores zoned Res. B - 6,000 square feet for single family house The Planning Commission recommended the land be divided as follows provided the applicant would provide a bond in the amount of 125% of the Engineer's estimate to provide off street parking on Lot 42. Parcel A - Lot 42 and the West 2 feet of Lots 43 - 10,000 Sq. Fto Parcel B - Lot 43 except the West 2 feet of Lot 43-9,080 Sq.Ft. The Administration concurs. Side Yard Variance West 1/2 of Lot 3 and Lots 4 and 5, Block 18, Devon Zoned A-2 6,000 square feet. The Planning Commission recommended a 1.7 foot side yard variance. The Administration concurs. 4. Street Front Variance Lot 22 and 1/2 of Lot 21, Block 3, Shadywood Point The Council acted on this at a previous meeting. The Planning Com- mission reapproved the 5.3 foot street front variance authorized in 1977. The Administration concurs. 5. Subdivision of Land Part of Lot 47 lying East of the West 200 feet, Auditor's Subd. 168 The Planning Commission recommended the division into two parcels as described on the survey (copy attached). The Administration con- curs. 6. Registered Land Survey Approval Part of Lot 26, Auditor's Subd. 170 The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Registered Land Survey for two lots in a part of Lot 26, Aud. Subd. 170. The Admin- istration concurs. Tabled. MINUTES OF MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION January 29, 1979 Present: Chairman Russell Peterson, Commissioners Gary Paulsen, Lorraine Jackson, Bill Renner, Harriett Dewey, Margaret Hanson, Bud Stan- nard; Council Representative Gordon Swenson; City Manager Leonard L. Kopp; City Inspector Henry Truelsen and Secretary Marge Stutsman. 1. MINUTES Jackson moved and Dewey seconded a motion to accept the minutes of the January 8, 1979 Planning Commissioh meeting as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. Board of Appeals 2. Subdivision of Land Lots 42 and 43, Mound Shores Merv Norling was present. Stannard moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to recommend approval of the subdivision as requested. Discussed parking requirement of two spaces on site with dwelling. Stannard moved to amend the motion to require a bond equal to 125% of Engineer's estimate to insure adequate parking spaces. Amendment was seconded by Renner. The vote on the motion as amended was unanimously in favor. Note: Councilman Swenson requested the property addreSs be included on the agenda of all items. Side Yard Variance Lots 4, 5 and west half of Lot 3, Block 18, Devon Dane Baker was present. Jackson moved and Hanson seconded a motion to reco~nend that the 1.7 foot side yard variance be granted as requested as it is necessary for enjoyment of a substantial property right and it will not be detrimental to the adjacent property owners. The vote was'unanimously in favor. Street Front Variance Lot 22 and 1/2 of Lot 21, Block 3, Shadywood Point David Linner not present; item moved down on agenda. Subdivision of Land That part of Lot 47 lying East of West 200 feet, Auditor's Subd. 168 Eugene Schlee and George Hussman were present. Renner moved and Jackson seconded a motion to recommend approval of the subdivision of property as requested. The vote was unanimously in favor. Planning Commission Minutes January 29, 1979 - Page 2 4. Street Front Variance Lot 22 and 1/2 of Lot 21, Block 3, Shadywood Point Stannard moved and Jackson seconded a motion to recommend the approval of the 5.3 front yard variance providing it meets all other setbacks because: (Same motion as previously recommended) 1. Road is 60 feet at this point and will be narrowing 2. Setback is compatible with other garages in neighborhood 3. Will not have an adverse effect On traffic and traffic safety. The vote was unanimously in favor. 6. Request for Division to be in form of Registered Land Survey 7o Part of Lot 26, Auditor's Subdivision 170 John Krost not present. Renner moved and Dewey seconded a motion to recommend approving accepting the Registered Land Survey as requested. The vote was unanimously in favor. Garage Site 'Lo~-l-7, Block 7, Shadywood Point Thomas Phillippi not present. Discussed briefly. Renner moved and Swenson seconded a motion to table. The vote was unanimously in favor. Motion made to adjourn. Attest: CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota REVISED AGENDA MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 29, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Minutes of the January 8th meeting. Board of Appeals Merv Norling Lots 42 and 43, Mound Shores - Map 4 Subdivision of Land (Addresses 5925/5921 Sunset Road) Dane D. Baker, 4913 Tuxedo Boulevard Lots 4, 5 and the W.% of 3, Block 18, Devon - Map 15 Side Yard Variance David Linner, 1890 Shorewood Lane Lot. 22 and % of 21, Block 3, Shadywood Point - Map 2A Street Front Variance Eugene G. Schlee That Part of Lot 47 lying East of West 200 feet, Auditor's Sub. 168 - Map 9 Subdivision of Land (Addresses 5880/5860 Beachwood Road) John Krost, 5409 Bartlett Boulevard Part of Lot 26, Auditor's Subdivision 170 - Map 8 Request for division to be in form of R.L.S. Thomas S. Phillippi, 1948 Shorewood Lane Lot 17, Block 7, Shadywood Point - Map 2a ~rage Site CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota January 29, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The City Council The Mound Advisory Commission The City Inspector Mound Zoning - Board of Appeals Merv Norling - Can see no problem with subdivision. Note, in all prbability existing garage will be demolished to allow for new construction. Where will the garage site be for new garage for existing house on lot 42. Would stipulate off street parking for existing house be fab- ricated or a cash bond be given to the City until which time parking can be installed. Dane Baker - 10% requires 9.7 feet side yard. I can see no problem in reducing side yard to 8.4 feet by allowing a side yard variance of 1.7 feet. 3. David Linner - Would like to see street set back no less than 6 feet. City Inspector Henry Truelsen FEE OWNER APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND PLAT LAND TEE S CO PARCEL Location and complete legal descriptior, of property to be divided: ZONING (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot I',lo. From Square feet TO Square feet Reasoll: · .'¥igkatur/~I , / / / Applicant's interest i. the property: f~~~ f~~ ' This applicatio~ must be signed b~ all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. ~NIH COMMI%ION RECOMMENDATION: /' ~ DATE I . ~~ · : '. Description for. Easb Tract~ Easb .of:' the. West.-~. 0 : We hereby ~ify fha[ this:-is, a true a~d correct'.eePresentation'of a su'rve9 o[ the boundaries oI the l~nd above deSbribea and of the locat~on of al1 bufldings~ ~ any, thereon and all visibte'enero;tchments~ ~ any~' from or oz¥ sa~d l~d.'.-.'Dated this ~ da~ _ WIDMER BROS., lNG. Page No. P. O. Box 235 MINNESOTA 55384 SPRING PARK,' Phone 471.8593 of Pages __/__-/ Cl~ STATE AND ZIP ~ ~ A.cun~cr. _(/z ~ I DATE OF PLANS We hereby subm : It Is expressly stipulated and agreed that the undersigned shall not be held liable for damages to grass, trees, shrubs and any underground obstructions, in- cluding pipes, electrical wiring and etc. ~]e ~Irllplllll to irnish material and I~}bor -- complete in accordance w~th above specifications, for the sum of: .... do,ars(, eo . Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. and conditions are sahsfacto~ and are hereby accepted You are authorized Signature to dO the work as s~ciFmd.~aym~l will b~mad~ as oJdmPd above · Date of Acceptance: ~>~- :/--/~:-7--~ ' All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifica- tions involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upo. strikes, accidents or delays beyond our con{roi. Owner to carry fire. tornado and other necessary insurance. Our workers are tully covered by Workmen's Compensation InstJrance. Si gnat ure · APP LICA TION FO~ARIANCE CITY OF MOUND · NAME OF A P P LI C A N T z~. ZONING PROPERTY .~ / __ .~ ' . P LA T~~ PAR CE L Address /<'//q/~' .~//['~'~.~2 ' ~ * ~~ . .LOT~~.~. BLOCK ,, Telephone .~?V/g~ .. ]~/7~/ Number~-~/.¢ ADDITION _~~c~ INTEREST IN PROPERTY O./t.//l/g_~O FEE O'WNER (if other than applicant) Telephone Address 'Number VA ~RffANCE REQUESTED: FRONT[ [ACCESSORY YARD FT. BUILDING NOTE: LOT SQ. rOOT^GE REAR YARD N. C. U.* or OTHER (describe) l_, Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show.approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the applicat, ion by extending survey or drawing. 3_. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude to,yard request. / ' . . , f i ' _ ~.,/_ _ . . · . . . . A bnil~in~ ~e~mit must be ~p~lie~ fou within one ye~ fuo~ ~he ~e of ~he ..... · co~ncH. ~esol~ion ou v~i~nce ~n~d ~ecomes null ~n~ [ P:LAN~'hNo COMMiSSION RECOMMENDATION ... ....... ~)-~ ..... DATE COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO .... . ..... DATE ~ . ~ ~ -' D~C~'IPTION: Lot~ f~, 5 and the we~t half of Lot 3f .- . . . . . . ~ . ,. .- . ~..;. i ! ' I ' .; ' ' '.' "-.. I ', . . ~/ Z'.- '~.~:-~ ~ " ! ; ..;." ' : ' '- ' ' X -;,~ '- ' . '-' I ~ . ~ ~, ~ , . . . . ~ ' ..... . . ~ . ;-~ · I . ~ ' CITY OF MOUND NAME OF APPLICANT DAVID LINNER ZOmN PROPERTY ADDRESS PLAT 61980 PARCEL 1475 Address MOUND 1890 SHOREW00D LANE 55364 Te le phon4e 72- 3240 Number__ LOT22 & % of 21 BLOCK ........ ADDITI(JN SHADYW00D POINT INTEREST IN PROPERTY _OWNER .... FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address · Telephone Number VA ILtANCE REQUESTED: FRONT YARD FT.] SIDE YARD . . ACCESSORY I BUILDING LOT SIZE i._ LOT SQ. FOOTAGE N. C. U.* or OTHER' (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: NOTE: 1_. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of. proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application b~ extending survey or drawing. 3--. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. PROPOSED GARAGE TO BE WITHIN 4FT. 8IN. OF LOT--LINE ". ',., A building permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the council resolution or variance granted becomes null and void. Variances are n~t~f~a~sferab)~.~ ~' ~ Signature PLANNING COMIVI[SSION RE COMM ~NDATION DATE COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLU~fflON NO.. DAT]~] / I ~./ ,- . . , .... ' .~ / '.'. ~ ~ - ', N .- " · : . '. ' - .. ' ' ' '-L '~--; ." ?". · · . . ~'.'zt? ~.. .... ..,,.I ;.c, rrert re,}resentation Of a surv,,v of the' boundaries of the !and atxwe desc. l,t)~d and ,d tr~e locatiun of al! buildings, if :~;~'.' thereon · ' Dated this k~f).~_, day f,,?/) P ,j FEE OWNER APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND Dagene G. Schlee 3140 Harbor Lane North Minneapolis, ~'.~-T 5 ~5441 FEE $ 2,5. O0 PLAT PARCEL Location and complete legal description of pral~erty to be divided: Thmt part of Lot 47 lying East of the West 200 feet of Auditor's Subdivision ~!umber 168, according to the pl~t thereof on file bud of reco~ in the office of the Register of Deeds, in ~ud for }te~nepin County, Minnesota X. ONING 4 - / To be divided as follows: See survey on each parcel (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New tot No. From Square feet T° Square feet ~ ................................. ADDRESS 3140 Harbor Lane North Hpls. Hn. 55441 Applicant's interest in the property: TEL. NO. 559-2200 DATE This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why ~his is not ~he case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE / / I I / I / / / / I I / / / / -/ / _1 / / i / I / I i I 1-23-79 CITY OF ~,IOUND Mound, Minnesota January 12, 1979 COUNCIL },~MORANDUM NO. 79-24 SUBJECT: Registered Land Survey In 1977 Resolution 77-350, the Council authorized the division of Part of Lot 26, Auditor's Subdivision 170, as shown on the copy of the ~ttached survey. The land was divided and a house was built on Parcel A. The owner now desires his division to be in the form of a Registered Land Survey. Acceptance by the City of the ~.L.S. is required. A re~o!ution approving accepting the Registered Land. Survey is requested. ~ TO: The Planning Commission The City Council referred this item back for your recommendation. NVayzata, JOHN 0}' :P~O~'~'~' OF. d,~.sccihed as follows: S 5 4 0 9 .BAR T .L__._E_.T..T ..... B.LY_.D_,_ ."_ £ . 0 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION Sec. 22.03~a VILLAGE OF MOUND. OF LAND FEE OWNER ,.¢-4o ~ .,,'¢ ~,,.z' lc ~ 8 i,~d. 170 ZON,NG L/ -- r':' r' .. ..... Location and complete I~gal description of property to be divided: THAT PART OF 'LOi 26 LYING W.OF::A F'INE.:, RUNNING FRO.,'~ A PT 145' FT E OF THE ; : NWL¥ COR OF SAID LOT 2& 'To'''A PT 1o0'~'-.' j FT 'E OF 'A PT 356 8&lO FT S .OF SAID Nw .J ~COR .AND. SAME__.L[NE E~[_E._fl_DED..,,~ ..... : ........... ......::: ' t To be divided as follows: Square feet ~ JUl 8197F ~' ' ~2 (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed .~JL-,~'~~.. O~ ~O~. building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From Square feet TO Reason: Applicant's interest in the property: ~~ ~',~ ~ ~0 ~; 1~ lhis ~pplication mu~t be ~i~ned b~ aH the OW~S o[ the property, or on explan- ation ~iven wlW this is not tho case. TEL. NO. ~ 7,~"" g ~-"~-"O DATE ."7'- 7- 77 /t o ,.c :~ ," ¢,', PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: COUNCIL ACTION Gran'b division Division o£ land as previously approved by Council Resolu%ion 74-!47 be reaffirmed. DATE July 28, 1977 wi'~h stipulations. DATE Aughts% 9, 1977 OF T}~ CITY CODE RECARDI~G T~ DIVISION OF PROPERTY PART OF LOT 26, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVIEION N0. 170 (Pla% 61~90 ~rcel 7200) an application to waive %he au%division ~ ~ ~ · in SectiOn 22.00 of the City Code has been filed with the City of Mound, and said request for a w~iver has been reviewed by the Plan~ing Com- mission and the City Council, and WHERF~AS, it is hereby determined, that there are special circumstances affecting said proper~y such that the strict application of the ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land; that the waiver is necessary for th~ preservatio~ and enjoymen~ of a substantial property right; and that granting the ". waiver will not b~ detrimental to the public welfare or injurious ~0w, T~EFORE, ~E IT RESOLVED BY T~ C~TY C0~¢IL 07 Tt~ CITY 0F '~. The ~¢eques~ of_ _ _ John_ W. ~os%. -' ' for the waiv~ from %h~ provisions of Sec%ion 22.00 City Code and th~ ~equest to subaivia~ property of les~ five ac~s is hereby ~anted to pe~t divizio~ of the follow- ing prope~y in the'following m~nner: .- · Plat 61290 ~rcel 7200 be divided'into Parcels A and B as per . at~ched s~y provided 15 feet of sewer late~t at $9.04 a foot-be picked up and a per, hen, ease~nt be made on-~rcel.A for access to ~rcel B. It is determined that the foregoing division will constitute a desirable and stable community development and is inharmony with adjacent properties. The City Clerk is authorized to delive~ a certified copy of this resolution to the applicant for filing in the office of the Register of Dee~s or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County to show compliance with the subdivision re~alations of this City. Adopted by the Council this _ ?th day of 1-23-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, P~innesota January 16, 1979 COUNCIL ~E~!O~NDUM NO. 79-29 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 17, Block 7, Shadywood Point The owner of Lo~ 13, Block 2, Shad~ood Point has requested the City to release for sale Lot 17, Block 7, Shad~ood Point in order to build a garage on Lot 17 (see copy of letter a~tached). Since the~gara~e would be separate from the original lot, She Droposa~ for.the ga~ag~ Would have to go ~hr0u~h-the Planning Commission fo~ aDproval. Does the Council wish to release the lot to accommodate the request? cc: T. Phillippi ROA~ ~ o¢'/~/;?t all?C,:, C.'.:o6. ¢2_ ! 2-13-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-53 SUBJECT: Prosecuting Attorney - CM 79-42 This item was repOrted to the Council on Council Memorandum 79-42, but did not appear on the final agenda because the full Council would not be present. This item will be listed for discussion on the February 13th Agenda. Please bring February 6 packet (Pages 347-351). ........ ~,eo~ard L. Kop~~'5 cc: Police Chief T. Piepkorn 2-13-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 6, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-51 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land Lot 25, Block 6, Woodland Point is tax forfeit and the City needs an easement for street construction as follows: A perpetual easement and a temporary construction easement for street purposes over and across the following described property: Lot 25, Block 6, Woodland Point, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said perpetual easement being the southerly 5.00 feet of the easterly 10.00 feet of said Lot 25, and said temporary construction easement being the easterly 5 feet of said Lot 25. Said temporary construction easement expires August 1, 1979. A resolution authorizing the Mayor and Manager to apply for the easement is requested. Leonard L. Kopp J I7" cc: Lyle Swanson 2-13-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 6, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-52 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land The lots below are tax forfeit and should be taken as a part of Tyrone Park. 1. Lot 5 and the South 10 feet of Lots 4 and 22 and 1/2 of the adjacent Vacated Street, Block 28 - Plat 37950 Parcel 4750 2. Lot 21, Block 28, Seton - Plat 37950 Parcel 4905 A resolution authorizing the Mayor and Manager to request these for Park purposes is requested. cc: Lyle Swanson .~ ~...::; .. . ~EvoN, . ' .~ ' ~, ': 't'' : - ;~0 ~o ~" ' : "..~ ~ 4o ..... - -] ~ TYRONE ...... ; / o .!~. , -._,_ _._ _, [.,. .. CLARE '.-.~.-~.: / :i ~~~'~ - ; ~- ~ ,I I ~'. ~- ' $.~ ~ '/ ~ SHANNON ~ i $ . ~ ~ i- :.. ~, -~: -_ .--, , ..... · ., -../o~~ :~.~ '-: I Ix) 2-13-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-59 SUBJECT: Taxicab Licenses - Renewal Renewal applications have been received for licensing of three taxi- cabs to operate in Mound from the Town Taxi Company, Inc. ~e~ard '~. ~opp )Z-/~' TAXICAB LICE Ann. License Fee $15,00 First Cab 10.00 Others Payable with application Address Date of Application, Class of Vehicle ~5~e~o~er,,. , Length of time vehicle has been in use Caz?ying Capacity~3 ~q ~ License,~ . .p C-(. W ~7 ? Serial No. ~'03 ~ 15~rJl 5 ~- Is above car mortgaged?. ,.~o , Name of Mortgagee Amount of Mortgage Holder of Legal Title Is Vehicle Leased Licensed Or under any form of contract per- mitted to be used and operated by some other person than the one holding legal title thereto? ~.~o . ....... What person, firm or corporation cOllects the revenues from operationof above cab? What person, firm or corporation pays the expenses of operating above cab? Proposed Fare Schedules: This is a true and correct statement to the best of nV knowledge. /c.,t :, ' , Subscribed and sworn to before me 'this :? ,,' ~ ~.~.~"~ HENNEPIN COUN~ ) ~ ~J. ~ Comml~i~ ~xplr~ Oct 5. I~3 ~ Applicant day of .~.~,. Ann. License T:'ee $]5.00 First Cab 10.00 Others Payable with aoplication TAXICAB LICE]~SE APPLICATION Class of Vehicle Length of time vehicle has been in use ~ ~Te~r_~' / 1,%kc Of Car i~/ ~-~( Engine NCo' Is above car mortgaged?.. .~o Name of I,Iortg~gee Carrying Capacity_ Amount of Mortgage. Holdo of L° l Title M Is ~ehicle Leased Licensed Or under any form of contract per- mitred to be used and opqrated by some other person than the one holding leg~.l titie there ~o. %fnat person~ firm or corporation collects the revenues from operation of above cab? What person, ......... ..... t%'oposed Fare Schedules:: I0 firm or corporation pays the expenses of operating above cab? t~oposed Hours and Days of Service:,_ This is a true and correct statement to the best~/~_~_~_.~.~_~_m~_''cf ~V knowledge. ¢~ ~.~. , - ~'~'~ Applicant ~ ,?a~'~, ST~VEN A. HARVEY ~ / ~ f~. ~Z~ NOTARY PUBLI~ MINNESOTA ~ ~ tL~ HENNEPIN COUNTY ~ AI]n. L:i. co. nh;~; }Vo.o $15,00 T,'ir~t Cab 10.00 Oth(:rs Payable with aoplication TAXICAB LICENSE APPLICATION Length of time vehicle has been in use ~ ~e~' of Ic¢? ' Is above car mortgaged?~_~ Amount of Mortgage Date of Application_~/>?- 6- - ? '~' Carrying Ca~city~ ()~jg~ Name of 1,lcfii-gee Is Vehicle Leased Licensed Or under any foz~:a of contract per- mi%ted 2o be used and o~erated by some o2her person %hah 'the one holding legal there't o? ~ ~> %Cna% person, firm or corporation collects the revenues from opezation of above cab? b~aat person, firm or corporation pays the expenses of operating above cab? IToposed Fare Schedules: t~oposed ttours and Ikays of Service:.___~ ~ knowledge. Thi~ is a true and correct statement to the best of '7"'%~'~-'V ' Applicant Subscribed and sworn to before me 'this~.:' ~m~~ '~day of ~~~ ' / [ /~ 1)~ NOTARY PUBLIC' MINN ~ ~ .... i (:~--~ HENNEPIN GOgNTY t , .~ l~m I. ~;~ri~eO Insured and Address: (tlc., street, Town or City, County, State) :~'~ '.CO~I TAX! CO;.~A~ INC. ROGER M~ HAI~AUER AGE!~CY~ lliC. ~ 7440 OXFORD STo 2359 JOY i' SP~ LOUIS PAPd(, M_I~N~oOTA WIIiTE B~R ~KE, M!I~t~ 55110 3700 WILSHIHE BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES, CALIFOHP~IA 900~0 ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI (A stock insurance compony, herein coiled the company) [] JrKJJvJduaJ [] Portrtershlp [~L] Corporation [_3 Joint Venture [~] Other ........................................ The msu~m~ce ~florded is only with ~especl ~o lhe Coverage Pml(s) indicated helow by specific p~ennurn charge(s) ~nd oll~ched to m~d formJn~ ~ port of thfs policy ~re;~iu;;i; ' Part Ns(s). Cevur~ge Prat(s) Prenlimns Part t~e(s). CoveraE~ P~rl(s) t, utom~ Hie f, ed cai Payi}f:nts insurance Auto nellie Physical Damage Insurance Insurance (Dealers) '~ Owner's and Contractor's Protcchv~ Liability Automobie Phy~k:ai Damage Insurance Insurance (Fleet Automatic} [~ - Owners' Iandlords' and Te;ants' Liability Autom~)bile Physical Damage Insurance L Insurance Basic Automobile Liability Insurance ;S Premises Medical P:~y:::ents Insura%e Compieted Operations and Products .~P=3=- ~.3.D_~ .... ?n~pzt'.?Z~j~ Au?m~i~e I.i~bility Insurance $ Incl ~ in PERSO,>~AL Ii~JU~,Y 6umpr~o~si,'~ 0~cr~ti~i~ity l,sura:,ce Auto Lia~ ~CP0587 PROTECTiO>~ Contractual Liability Insurance Garage insurance 'TCr]~]~'fim--~er~--~F~nd~s~]~e~t~]h~r than those entered on CoverzgeP~rt(sl, att,~ch~datlssu~ CA0?lO,TAB003,GU6631,2331,CP0587~ 2352~ 2352,'2352,2352 (::'$, 939 o Total/~.dvnmce Premi,am fnrthis policy:; _ _,. J Payable in installments pez End:~2 * If O',e Policy Period is more than cue year and the premium is to be paid i, installments, premium is payable on: Liie, ctive Date ]st Anniversary 2nd Anniversary S66,939,,$ TBD $ ~'BD I~rd 4. During the p~si three yeors no insurer has cancelled insurnnce, issued to thc na~]e~ insured, shnilar to thai afforded hereunder, unless otherwise stated herein: By ¢~'¢' "--~'~j," ~' Piti, in U,S.A. ' " -" '~'~rhhOrlZed SCJEgULE ~fforded is only with respect to s,ch or th~ followh~B CoveraBes a~ a~e indJcaJ~d by specific p~mJum charge or ch~r~s. Tile limit oJ the compan~ such Cove~aBe shall be as s~a~ed herehl, subject to ali the t~rms or this policy hovin~ reference ~here~o. [ ~00 thousand dolbrs each person C-Bod;Jy Jnjug Liability ~0~.~0~.. _ J .,. 300 thousand dollars e~ch ccc,Jr?J~ce ~__] ........ ]. 00_ ]~9,sand dolhrs eac:h e~:c,rre~ce ¢13~4.7~o pTD__ - cpOsO?(End~l) ~'' Premiums Bescriptioa of liaz,~rrls Form numbers of endorsements a~acJ',ed at issu.-. J 131 PD 1. Owned Aotoruo..h..i~% --- Premium Basis -- Per Automobi]a InWhichthe Adlomobiie / t~d I i Trade/tame I Size; Tank Oaiionage Capac- J Serial Number j ~0,0020 1205120 Per attachod schedule 2. tJia':d fiidamubil,,s -- P~emium ~'sis -- Cost of Hire ' "r ~ ] Lncat;onsWhere ~otomnbiles J Purposes J EsbmaterlCost ~otesFer$lf~OCostofHire ~f any 3. Mon~wnad A.tomo~]es -- Premium Basis -- Class ] Persons and Class 2 Employeo~ c~ass i Persons- ~Japle of Each Location of Hcadquarters o~ Persons Namea Herei~ Cbss 2 Employees--Estimated Average r~umberj Location Of tleadquarters of Class 2 Employees o ~0,810o "cost eT l;iro" raear, s the m~m, unt incurred for (a) the hire of ..q,!~,trr.~}i!g.% including the entire remuneration Bi each ernp~oy~ ~ of the ~:l:~cd i,trrcd cng~g~ d in the operation ef snch a',tornnhit~s subject to ~n averaEe ~aeldv I~';z~'~,4 ~ remu,eration of $100, a;ld for (bi p;ckmp, transportation er dehvery service of property or pa~serrFrs, ether Il,an snch services porform¢,d by m~to, ca;riots which are subj%t to the security requirrmenls of ~y moJor cnrrier law has purchased ~etcvmbi~e ~odi!y I.jrry t iability ~nd Prol;erty O~m2Ee J iabili~y insuranco rnverin~ the interest of lhe 1:2f~ed i.s~}red cna direct primary (a) all employees, includinE officers, of the p;mgd inso[J~d cornpcpsbted for the use of such ~qJ0lDoJ~J~¢s by salary, cofoHiJsgJoll, terms of Cnlp!oyme.t, or specific operatin~ fl)low.nco of any sort; (b) ail direct a~rlts ~md r~-p,esentatJves of "Cl2ss 2 er;]pfoy~s" me~ns all employees, includin& oJf~cers, of the named insured, not i.cluded m Class 1 persons. (over) 2-13-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-55 SUBJECT: License and Permit Fees At the last Council meeting, the subject was tabled. It was on Council Memorandum 79-44 (see pages 324-325) and will be listed for discussion at the February 13th meeting. CITY OF MOUND MouDd~ ~innesota February 8~ 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-57 SUBJECT: Gambling Ordinance Amendment When the Gambling OrdinanCe was published,, two typographical errors were made in the report. In order to properly change the ordimance, an amendment should be made. A copy of the proposed amendment is a~ached, CLAYTON L. CURTIS ,%. PEAR~ON JOHN B. DEAN G LEN.N [.PURDUE LAW OFFICES Lu:FE'v 'RE: LEFLER, PE/-\RSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 22, 1978 '~[t EpHONE Rro Leonard_ L. Kopp City Manager City of Hound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnosoha 55364 Re: Proposed Gamblinc~ Ordinance Dear Len: Some time ago the City Council asked me to prepare an to implement Chapter 507, Laws of Minnesota for 1978. legalizes c(:r~ain ga~r~!ing devices for certaip, organizatio~;. Preparation of this ordinance has been delayed ~.~hile cer't'~:~.~n Lhings have been d. one to fey.Jew the authority to ad. opt such ~-~.n o:rdt.inance or to authorize such devices. The law purports to authorize three 'forms of ga~sbling, paddtewheels, tipboards and raffles. I am concerned %~at the legislature has overstepped its bounds in the adoption law. Article XIZI, Section 5 of the Minnesota Constit(~t.ion ~:eads as follows: "Section 5. Prohibition of Lotteries. The lcgisl~ture shall not authorize any or the sale of lottery tickets." ~Te have t~'ied to check and get some historical data a~ 'L(> how -Ellis law came in~.o being. It is ou~ und. ers%.anding from with cerh~;i~z persons in 'the Attorney General's office. 1'bat have reservar, ions about the law and th~it it was no~ chccke(] approved by the Atto:rn~-y General prior to passage. It would -' = ~ ,xpp,._a~. that raffles as defined in Chapter 50'/ an(:! J.n our orc:lnanc© appear to be ].otterJes and ~.his LAW OrrlC~:$ LE:FEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Mr. Leonard L. Kopp P,~ge 2 November 22, 1978 there is a serious question concerning the constitutionality of the statute. As a result of 'that concern we have incorporated in this ord. inance a provision that the licensee is required to save the City and its officers, agents and employees harmless against any claims or actions or cost of defending any claims or actions arising out of or by reason of the granting of such a license or re~ating to the conduct of any of the activities being offered by such a license. If-the co~mcil decides to adopt the ordinance, I think it should be made perfectly clear to the organizations that if any-action is brought against the City questioning the consti- tutionality of this ordinance, the City will not incur expenses in defending the ordinance. It is my suggestion that you, the Police Chief and members of the council review this ordinance carefully prior to its adoption and ~..ake any revisions which are deemed necessary. It should be pointed out that the state law makes it clear that it' is up to each ~t~.nici-. pality to determine if they want to provide for such a license ~tnd authorizes the municipality to be more restrictive than %he sb. ate law. If you have any further questions concerning the ordinance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours/~ CAP:ms Enclosure 0RCINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 43 TO THE CITY CODE LICENSING AND REGUlaTING THE CONDUCT OF G~4BLING'AND ESTABLISHING LICENSE Ft~ES, AND ~4ENDING I~.:CONSISTENT-ORDINANCES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THE CITY OF MOUND DOES ORDAIN: Chapter 43 is hereby added ~:o the City Code and shall read as follows: Chapter 43 Lic. en_~si_j~g and Regulating Certain' Gambling Section 43:00. purpose. The purpose of this section is to regulate and control the conduct of certain gambling activities pursuant to %he provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, and Laws of Minnesota, 1978, Chapter 507. Section 43:05. Provisions of State ~Law Adopted. The provisiOns of ~innesota Statutes, Chapter 349 and Laws .of Minnesota, 1978, Chapter 507, relating to the definition of terms, licensing, and resir3rictions of gambling are adopted and made a part of this ordinance as if set out in full. Section 43:10. Definitions. Subdivision 1. For the purposes of this ordinance the terms defined in this ordinance have the following meanings. Subd. 2. "Gambling devices" mean those gambling devices known' as "paddlewheels" or "tipboards", or apparatus used in con- ducting raffles. Subd. 3. "Paddlewheel" means a wheel marked off into sections containing one or more numbers, and'which, after being turned or spun,, uses a pointer or marker to indicate winnin¢3 chances. Subd. 4. "Tipboard" means a board, placard or other device measuring at least 12 inches square, marked, off in a grid or similar pattern, in which each section contains a hidden number or hUm. bets, or other symbol, which determines the winning chances. Subd. 5. "Raffle" means a game in which a participaa*~ buys a ticket for a chance at a prize with the winner detern~ned by a random drawing. Subd. 6. "Profit~' ~:eans the gross receipts from the opera- tion of ga]tabling devices and the condt~ct of raffles, less reasonable sums expended for prizes, local licensin9' fees, taxes and mair~.enance costs for the devices. Subd. 7~ N,~,'thing in this ordinance shall be .construed to authorize any use~ p©ssession or operation of: (a) Any gan~bling device which is activated by the · s~'~ ~ f coin or token; or in .... r~ion o a (b) Any ¢3a).~bling game or device in which the winning nurabe~.~:~, tickets or chances are in any way determ3~%ed by tb,~ o~tcome of any athletic contest or sporting even':,; ~ Section ~3:15. License Re. quirement. No person st'all directly operate a !ta~bling device or conduct a raffle except as authorized by statu!~e and this code and unless a license to do so~ as provided in this <;~_-dinance, has first' been o~tained. Section 4~ ;0. Persons Eliqible for a License. A licen.~e shall be issued onl,y to fraternal, religious and veterans organiza- tions, or any corp©:~%ion, trust, or association organized for exclusively scientific, literary, charitable, educational, or artistic ,purposes~ or any club which is organized and operated clusivel~or plea~ure or recreation. Such organization mush have been in ex?~,n~ce f~' a'~ least 3 years and shall have at leas~ 30 active members, and ~.~iualify pursuant to M.S.A. 349.26 Subd. 9. Section 4~25., Licenses and Fees. Subdivision 1. Fees. The~,~"e are. t%~:~ types of licenses which may be issued by the e~,~ device ~i~i occasion, i. e. (a) a single occasion city for .... license fee and (b) an annual license fee. .The single occasion temporary license fee for each dev!ce is $~5.00. license ~ees shal[~ no'l: be ~ro~g~ed-for-a portion of a year. licenses shall expir~: on February 1 next afte~ the date of issue, Proc=~aure. Application for a l~cense shall be ~.~de 'upon a form prescribe6{ by the city manager so as ito provide %ne inforn-:ak.J.on necessary to permit the co~cil to de~.rmine whe'aher to grant or ~.{,~ny a l~c_nse application. ~:,o p~roon sh~l! a false, re~r~se~J~a'[~'~. ....... in an application.. _ within 180 days. fro~' of application, b~.~: ~-~-: shall ~,o~ _~ssue a license ~hil at least 30 after the application's, has been made. Sl~d. 3. '[t~b.~ ~pp!ications~ shall contain an agreement on Dart of the applican~'. ~tna'h if the license being applied fo~.is th~ l~cen .... e %~11 sa/,= ~ne ~lt3 and it= offtcero, ~g=.nt~ ~arm ..... a(jainsh any clai~na~ o]; actions and th~ cosi-s of ~lefendingSn~,n~, or achic~ns arising o'ua of or by zeason of the granting' of~.he lice~'~ or l~he con.~[~ of any of the activities ~.u~..~,prized by tbe~ license, Section 43:30. Profits., Profits from the operation of gambling devices or the conduct o~ raffles shall be used only for proper purposes' as d. efined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.12, Subdivision 6. Section 43:'35. Conduct of Gambling. Subdivision"l. " Gambling Manager. All operating of gambling devices and the conduct of raffles shall be under the supervision of a single gambling manager to be designated by the licensed organization. The gambl.ing manager shall be responsible for g~oss receipts and profits from gambling devices and raffles and for their operation. The ogam,~lin~ manager shall be responsible for using profits for authorized, purposes only. - ~ Subdivision 2 Bond.' ~ . R.~e garp~ling manager shall provide a fidelity bond in the sum 0f~$10~000 in favor of the organization obtaining the license, conditionedl~ upon the faithful performance of his duties. SubdJ. vision 3. Qualifications of Ga~bling Manaqer. The gambling manager shall be~ an active member of the organization and shall qualify to act in such capacity under applicable state law. Section 43:40. .Compensa~.pn.. No compensation shall be paid to any person in connection wi-th the operation of a gambling device or the conduct of a raffle by a licensed organization. No person who is not an .ac'hive member of an organization, or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active me~er,' may participate in the organization's operation of a gambling device or the con- duct of a raffle. Section 43:45. Reportoin~_~equirements. Subdivision 1.~ Gross Receipts_. Each organization licensed, to operate gam. b!in_~ devices shall keep record of its g~.oss receipts, expenses-and profits for each single gathering or occasion at which gambling devices are operated or a raffle is conducted. All deductions f¥¢nn gross~receipts for each Single gathering or occasion shall be docu~ mented with receipts or other records indicating the amount, a description of the purchased item or service or other reason ~or the deduction, and the recipient. ~.he distribution of profits shall be itemized as to each payee, purT~3ose, amolunt and date of payment~ Sub~.ivision 2. Separation of Funds. Gross receipts fron] the operation of gambling devices and the co~duct of raffles shal.]. be segregated from other revenues of %he organization, and placed in a separate account The person who accounts = - ~or gross receipts, expenses and profits fro~l the operakion of gambling devices o£ the conduct of raf.fles shall not be the same person who acco~unts for okher revenues of 'the licensed organization. Subdivision 3~ Monthly__Reports. Each organization lic- _~nsed to operate gambling devices or to cond. uct raffles shall report monthly to ihs membership, and to the city clerk, its gross ~_.~celphs, expenses and profits £ro~n gambling devices or raffles, and the distribution of profi~:.~:~.. The licensee shall preserve such records for at least 3 years. Section 43:50. .Eligible Premises. Gambling devices shall be operated and raffles conducted by a licensed organization only upon .premises which it owns or leases, except that tickets for raffles may be sold off the premises. Leases shall be in writing and shall be for a te~ of at least 'one year. No lease shall provide that rental payment[~ be based upon a percentage of receipts. A copy of the lease shall be filed with the city clerk at the time of the application and it shall comprise a part of the application. " Section 43:55. Prizes. Total prizes from the operation of paddle wheels and tipboards awarded in any single day in which they are operated s~a'I.1 not exceed $500. Tohal prizes resulting from any single spin of' a paddle wheel or from any single tipboard shall not exceed $100. Total prizes awarded in any calendar year by any-organization shall r~o-t exceed $15,000. · Section 43:60. Bingo. Nothing in th.~s ordinance shall be construed to authorize th~:~ conduct of bingo without acquiring a separate bingo licensee as required by other applicable city ordinance provisions. Section 43:65,~ Penalties. Subdivision 1. Violation's }.Jisdemeanor. Violation of any provision of this ordinance is a ]~>.T~- d-~eanor and shall bc pm~ishable in accordance with the applicable statutory and .city code provisions relating to misdemeanors. SubdivisioD 2~ Suspension and Revocation. Any license may be suspended or revoked for any violation of this ordinance. No · licensee shall have a vested right in any license issued here~m~5~r, and licenses issued hereunder may be suspended or revoked by the . lxcen~:~ shall be revoked upon a showing that the counci 1 The ' q ~ licensee violated or caused to be viola'ted any provisions of this ordinance, or of stat(: law regulating the licensing or conduct o.[ gambling devices. ~.['he license shall also be revoked, in the ever:a of any misrepresen~atfi0n in the license application or may be sus.- pended or revoked for failure b~ the licensee t° make any reports required of the licensee. _-~-~-~ Subdivision 3. Proced'~-e. A license shall not be revoked under subdivision 2 ut~":[.! a notice has been given to the lJ. cen~e and the-licensee has been.given an oppor[~unity, for a hearing. The notice shall be personally served on the ga~r. bling manager, officer of the licen:-<;~% organ, i~.~.a-~ion. It shall state the or ordina~'.ce provision believed to have been violated and .... - SI],:) ~ .'... indicate ~}~at %he li¢:e:nsee may de.rxand a hearing on the £evocation of the license. If a hearing is demanded, the license shall not be revoked until after '[he hearing is held. If the licensee requests a hearing in writing, it shall be held by the city co~ncil or a committee of the city council, as the council ma~f' deem appropriate, at least one week after the date on which the request is ~ade. If, as a result of the hearing, the council finds that the licensee has violated or has permitted the violation of this ordinance o~ applicable statutory law relating .to gambling, the council may suspend or terminate the license. Section 43:70. Modification of.Other Ordinance Prohibitio~ts~ The prohibitions contained in Sections 54.20, 54.21, 54.26, 54.'40 and 60.02 subdivisions j and 1 of the City Code shall not apply to activities licensed and conducted in accordance with this Chapter 5~. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Adopted by the City Council HERBERT ~'. LEF'LER CURTIS A. PEARSON JOHN E. DRAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B. DEAN GLENN E,PURDUE JAMES D.LAR$ON ~IERBERT Po LEF.LER JEF.FREY J. STRAND LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON,O'BRIEN & DRAWZ IlOO FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 February 7, 19 79 TELEPHONE {6 I;~) 333- O 5~1,3 Mr. Leonard L. Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, ~innesot a 55364 Re: Gambling Ordinance Dear Len: This will confirm our telephone conversation wherein you have indicated to me that the typographical errors contained in the gambling ordinance which had been corrected prior to the council's passage did not get into the final form sent to the newspaper. It appears, therefore, that we have two sections with minor deletions and I have prepared a new ordinance making these corrections. I believe this can be presented to the council for their approval and. these sections republished without having to redo the entire ordinance. Ver. y truly your~ City Attorney CAP: ms Enclosure ORDINA~CE AN ORDINanCE AMENDING AND CORRECTING SECTION 43.10 SUBDIVISION 7, SUBSECTION (a) AND SECTION 43.25 SUBDIVISION 2, OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO GA~LING The City of Mound does ordain: Section 43.10. Subdivision 7, Subsection (a) of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 43.10 Subd. 7 (a) Any gambling device which is activated by the insertion of a coin, currency, or token; or Section 43.25 Subdivision 2 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 43.25 Subd. 2. .Application Procedure. Application for a license shall be made upon a form prescribed by the City Manager so as to provide the information necessary to permit the council to determine whether to grant or deny a license application. No person shall make a false representation in an application. The City Council shall act upon any such application within 180 days from the date of application, but it shall not issue a license until at least 30 days after the application has been made. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Adopted by City Council Published in Official Newspaper 2-13-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 8, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-54 SUBJECT: Consulting Services Material on Council Memorandums 79-30 and 79-47 covered this item. Although it was listed on the preliminary agenda for February 6th, it was withdrawn from the final agenda because the full Council would not be present. Refer to Pages 230-238 January 23rd Agenda and Page 340 February 6th Agenda. ¢/,/ CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota February 7, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-17 SUBJECT: Chestnut Road The owner of Lot 24, Koehler's Addition to Mound wishes to build on the lot and we have asked that he provide the City a street and utility easement. He also is going to try to get an easement over Lots 25 and 26. (See map attached) The City has already acquired 30 feet of Lots 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31. GOO~NOII03 I-- 0 -1 (~ ~N~'9. NOdgNV9'''~ /- '-.._3 LJ..J ON ~KE MINN~ON~ INDIAN ~URIAE MOUND~ 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, ~INNESOTA 5536~ {612) 472-~55 ~e~ 9~ ~979 Thomas Prokasky & Associates, Inc. 1102 Wesley Temple Building Minneapolis, MN. 55403 Dear Tom: Attached is a copy of a notice received today authorizing us to move forward with the handicapped facilities for the City Hall. We can now proceed with plans, specifications, etc. Sincerely, City Manager LLK/ms cc: City Council U,S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URP, AN DEVELOPMENT L.OC RECEIVEDFEB NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF GRANT CONDITIONS (Pursuant ~o Section 104(h) of Tide I of the I¢ousing and Community Development Act of 1974) 1. TO: (.¥a,ne DJ .Spp!ica:~t) ~m! t~ [Name ami Tith' ul' ChicZ k'xccutire Off i( ¢.r o~ A pldica~ ~) U[ban llennep±n County Dale A. Ackmann, County Administrator 2. WITH COPY TO: (P,'i;/ne,~fGrantceifother than Appltcont} NA Re: (Prcdcct. Title or Name) See Below ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF APPLICANT · A2300 ltennepin County Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 ADDRESS AND ZIP CODE OF GRANTEE NA LOCATION (CTt.v. County and State} Mound, Hennepin County, Hinnesota On January 22, I979 [Date [~efltt{'at ]or l{t'lcase o.t' I;'und$ and CertifY'cation Received} and Gertification pertaining to the above project. this office received your Request for Release of Funds [] No objections to the release of such funds or to the Certification have been received and a period of 15 days from and after the receipt of such request and Certification has expired. All objections to the release of such funds and to the Certification which were received by HUD within a period of. 15 days from and after the receipt of such request a,~CCertification have been considered by HUD. Any and all project and funding conditions, tO the extent that these are based on environmental review and c',earance, in Grant Agreement for Application/Grant No. g-78-UC-27-0001 ' authorized by HUD on 6-8-78 , are removed. This Notice constitutes your authority to use funds provided to you under Title I of the Housing and .Community Development Act of 1974, for the above prolect. (AuOiorify I$ limited to funds available for the current pro£ram year, if this is a multi, year Prelect. For subsequent program y¢~rs, such authority is conditioned upon dm availability of such funds, the submission by you of ~n ap¢licarion and pe approval by HUD of such application under Tide I of said Act. I Year IV Project 66 Avalon Park Improvements Year IV Project 67 Land Clearance for Park Indian Knoll Manor Year IV Project 68 Handicapped Facility Improvements Co~nunity Center Year IV Project 71 Hand~.capped Improvements to City Hall Effective Date: 2-7-79 ,'/"~, ~ d. · "' '"~7':- ~':- J Previous Edit;on is Ob;olute ~ tLS, GOVEI~/IMEb~T PfII~TII,IO OFF'lC<: 197~-15'23.MI ZIG HUD-701ro.16 HENNEPIN OFFICE OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT A-2308 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 Fe__bruary 8, 1979 Hr. Leonard L. Kopp City of Hound 5341Maywood Road Hound, MN 55364 Re' Notice of Removal of Grant Conditions Dear Mr. Kopp: Attached is a copy of the Notice of Removal of Grant Conditions from the Area HUD office. This notice constitutes authority to use funds for Project66, 67, 68, y. las included in the Year IV Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program. The effective date of this release is February 7, 1979 If there are any questions concerning this release please contact me or your Planning Area representative. Sincerely, Robert Isaacson Staff Planner RI/gs HENNEPIN COUNTY an cq. ual opportunity employer s~v~ss · .PAUL, MINNESOTA 55~ .... ' TO: Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager CASE City. of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 CEASE AND DESIST ORDER On January 29, 1979 a petition was filed with the Bureau of , · Madiation ServiCes bY Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc., Bloomington, Minnesota, , requesting that said employee organization be.certified as the exclusive representative for collective bargaining purposes of certain employees employed by th& employer. All sup.ervisory employees employed by the City of Mound Police Department Whose employment service exceeds the lesser of 14 hours per week or 35 percent of the normal work week and more. ~han 100 work days per year, .exciud. iq~. ~11 confidential empl~0Yees and the Chief of POlice. Therefore, the following Cease and Desist Order is applicable to all employees f~lling within the above description, and shall be in full force and effect until hearing has been conducted and the matter is disposed of by a ruling of the Bureau of Mediation Services: 'CEASE AND DESIST No negotiations may be carried on~ no increase in wages or compensation or additional fringe bene- fits may be granted or promised, nor shall any employees be questioned by the employer as to their membership in the employee organization, discriminated against in any way by threats of reprisals until this KIT:cc: elLocalFred JalonenNo. 320matter' has been heard .and/~/disp°sed~' of,... .. .'~"' ~"--' '~'"' Dated at St. Paul~ Minnesota, February 8, 1979 ~/ DIRECTOR .(AC"SING) ..... FO~H BMS-54 BUREAU OF MEDIATION SERVICES (Rev. 9-75) STATE OF MINNESOTA --'(PUBLIC) FUTURE USE OF THE MOUND BUILDING Dale E. Fisher: 2-12-79 Following authorization granted by the school board in its December meeting, central administration arranged a meeting on January 23 to explore the future use of the Mound building. Present were central administrators Dale Eo Fisher, Donald Brandenburg, and Wayne Smith; school board chairman Gary Mayer; police chief Chuck Johnson; com- munity services president Jim Regan; community services committee chairman Craig Clark; and community services coordinator Don Ulrick; with regretted absence by Leonard Kopp, Charles Peterson, and Jeanne Glenn. Herewith is an account of the future use of the Mound school building under the headings of current assumptions, specific plans, and status report. CURRENT ASSUMPTIONS 1. The Mound building should not be sold, but should be kept in district possession as a hedge against unforeseen student enrollment increases. 2. The grounds of the Mound school should be retained for the foreseeable future as school-community athletic and recreation facilities. 3. Portions of the building should be leased to non-profit organizations. 4. Central administration should be housed in the Mound building for the foreseeable future. 5. Seventh graders will be evacuated from the Mound building already for the 1979-80 school year. 6. Primary and Kindergarten children will be evacuated from the building eventually. 7. Community Services should be permitted to grow and function in the Mound building, to the limit of community services revenue. 8. A bond issue for the auditorium at the senior high location is out of the question for the foreseeable future. Future Use.. - 2 - 2-12-79 SPECIFIC PLANS A. Research on the part of central administration on four legal questions: Whether portions of the building can, practically, be leased only to non-profit organizations; whether leases can, practically, cover only the maintenance costs of the district; whether revenue from leases may be returned to the general fund of the district; and whether the district can spend capital outlay funds for the remodeling of portions of the building to be leased. B. A leasing arrangement whereby the-Police Department would take over 8400 square feet of basement, including the current space allotted to central administration and an outside basement entrance on the north side of the building, to be explored immediately and be presented to the school board in its March meeting. C. Removal of seventh graders from the building at end of the school year, and assignment to Grandview next school year. HEDGE: Student registration in the junior high division to be completed in late March will indicate whether any seventh graders must be shuttled back to the Mound building next year. D. Allocation of the first and second floors of the 1939 section of the building, across from the Mound Clinic, to the Community Services Council. E. Summer remodeling of'three pods in the northeast corner of the building for central administration and special services, With some facilities designed to be shared with the community services council. Occupancy in August. F. Early-fall remodeling of the basement quarters by the CiLy of Mound for use by the Police Department. Occupancy in September or October. G. Retention of the five pods in the southeast corner of the building for Kindergarten and primary children until space is found for them in other district schools. HEDGE: If under-expectation funding by the Legislature and over-expectation settlement of employee contracts converge to pressure the district budget, as may become clear by June, the 1980-81 budget may have to be rescued by savings through the precipitous evacuation of the Mound building. This action would temporarily overcrowd other schools, and would permit mothballing of five pods in the Mound building until use for them is discovered. H. Conversion of the gymnasium to an auditorium at some future date when funds permit and growth of the Performing Arts dictates. HEDGE: Because of drain on capital outlay funds for the addition to the Grandview school, the summer of 1982 would be the earliest opportunity to spend money on the downtown auditorium. Future Use.. - 3 - STATUS REPORT 2-12-7g 1. It has been determined through consultations with other school districts that the d~str~ct should lease only to non-profit organizations, that such leases should cover only district maintenance costs, and that lease revenue can be deposited in the district's General Fund. 2. On the subject of remodeling costs for the benefit of lessees, it has been determined through consultations with other school districts that the district should require lessees to stand the cost of their own re- modeling, and that remodeling plans are subject to the approval of.the school district. 3. Exploration of a mutually agreeable lease arrangement betw:een the City of Mound and District 277 is now being carried on by Roger Reed. 4. The junior high division has been directed by central administration to attempt to register all seventh graders in Grandview, and to report the results to central administration. 5. Central administration has complete drawings for central administration headquarters, on file for showing to school board members and others as desired. 6. Central administration is monitoring four contingencies which have a bearing on an earlier evacuation of Kinder- garten and primary children from the Mound building: ongoing enrollment fluctuatio.ns; the prospect of enrollment decline because of the Calvary Memorial School and even the addition of seventh and eighth grades at'the OLL school; the effect on budget of funding actions of the Legislature; and the effects on budget of salary settlements--the latter two matters becoming visible perhaps by June. 7. Central administration is seeking reaction simultaneously from school board and community services council to these perspectives and plans. CC: School Board, Community Services P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. · H. Dale Palrnatier · Albert L. Lehman · James S. Russell · Jean Williams February 7, 19 79 LAKE MINNETOHKA / I ~U~EsOTA ' NOTICE OF MEETING OF BOARD OF MANAGERS Thursday, February 15, 19 79 7:30 P. M. Wayzata City Hall AGENDA ENCLOSED 2. 3. 4. AGENDA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District February 15, 1979 Call to order; present, absent, staff. Reading and approval of minutes of regular meeting, 1/18/79. Approval or amendment Of February 15, 1979 agenda. Hearing of permit applications: A. 78-152. P. Grosz, Grading/Drainage Plan for "Morningview Terrace," County Road 110 near Jennings Bay of Lake Minnetonka - Minnetrista. Bo 79-01. R. Winterhalter, Fill Replacement on Lot Along Holy Name Drive, Northeast Shore, Holy Name Lake - Medina. C. 79-02. City of Wayzata, Shoreline Work, Grading/Drainage and Parking Lot Construction, City Beach and Marina, North Shore of Wayzata Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Wayzata. D. 79-03. R. Wilkins, Lake Setback Variance for Lot 1, Block 3, of Driftwood Shores, Lafayette Lane, Harrisons Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Mound. E. 79-04. C. Lemke, Wetlands Excavation for Wildlife Breeding Ponds, Southwest Corner of Hennepin County - Minnetrista. F. 79-05. A. Holm, Grading/Drainage Plan for a 15-lot Subdivi- sion Draining to Painter Creek - Maple Plain. G. 79-06.' Lundgren Brothers, Grading/Drainage Plan for Residential Development at the Southeast End of Hadley Lake - Plymouth. H. 79-07. G. Widmer, Fill Placement in Wetlands, County Road 110 Near West Shore of Jennings Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Mound. I. 79-08. Hakanson Anderson Associates - Grading/Drainage Plan for 13 Lot Subdivision on County Road 44' and Lake View Drive - Minnetrista. Correspondence. Hearing of requests for petitions by public for action by the Watershed District. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney. A. Treasurer's Report - Mr. Russell. (1) Administrative Fund Report. (2) Resolution for account on Creek Improvement Project. (3) Recommendation to purchase schedule position bond. Be Engineer's Report - Mr. Holmquist. (1) 1978 Hydrologic Data Report. (2) Hydrologic Data Report mailing list.. (3) 1977-1978 Maintenance Fund - project status update. (4) Lake Minnetonka water quality sampling - LMCD participation. (5) Pin.tree Pond - water levcl~. (6) Permit application form revision. (7) CP2-1, Gray's Bay dam site investigation. Attorney's Report - Ms. Peterson. (1) Creek Improvement Project (a) Agreement with Hennepin County. (b) Estimated Cost Projections (2) Edina Diversion Agreement (3) Monthly mailing list revision recommendations. Unfinished Business. A. EPA Grant Fund Termination. B. Mailing List Revision - Annual Report New Business. Adjournment. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT January 18, 1979 The regular meeting was called to order on January 18, 1979, by Chairman Cochran at 7:30 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers Present: Cochran, Lehman, Russell, Williams Manager Absent: Palmatier Also present were board advisors Jandro and Macomber. ~proval of Minutes. The minutes of the regular meeting of December 21, 1978 were reviewed. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the minutes be approved as published. Upon vote the motion carried. N. F. Ferrara, Shoreline Rip-Rap at 3410 Hardscrabble Point Road, Priest Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Minnetrista; Application No. 78-92. The engineer reviewed the application for placement of shoreline rip-rap and advised the managers that the application was in conformity with the applicable requirements of the Watershed District. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the application be approved as recom- mended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. T. Wymer, Fill Placement at 3615 Farmhill Road, near Halstad Drive South - Minnetrista; Application No. 79-01. The engineer advised the managers that adequate survey data had not been submitted by the applicant. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the application be tabled pending receipt of the survey data required by'the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Dock and Lift Service, Shoreline Rip-Rap at 3705 Northome Road on St. Louis Bay,. L~ke. Minnetonka - Deephaven; Appli.qation No. 79-02. The engineer reviewed the application to place rock rip- rap and indicated that the application was in conformity with the applicable standards of the Watershed District. It was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the application be approved as recommended by the.engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Page TWo January 18, 1979 E. Rydell, Residential Road Construction North of Luce Line Trail on Orono Orchard Road - 'Orono;~ Application NO~. 79-'0'3. The engineer reviewed the application for residential road construction and recommended approval subject to the con- dition that the applicant make separate application for grading and drainage permitS for future development of the property. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the application be approved on the condition that the applicant be required to submit a separate grading and drainage permit application when future development of the property is proposed. Upon vote the motion carried. Former Manager Robert B. Carroll. The managers noted, with deep regret, the death of former manager Robert B. Carroll, who~served on the Board of Managers from the establishment of the Board in 1967 until his retirement in 1976. The managers expressed their deep appreciation of Mr. Carroll's long and dedicated service on the Board and have formally extended their sympathies to Mrs. Robert B. Carroll. The managers noted receipt of a communication from Mrs. Carroll thanking the managers for their sympathies extended. Plymouth Boundary Petition. The managers noted receipt of a communication from the Director of the Division of Waters, Department of Natural Resources, acknowledging receipt of the District's petition for a change in the boundaries of the District within the City of Plymouth. Treasurer's Report. The treasurer distributed a revised statement of the administrative fund report dated December 21, 1978 pursuant to the direction of the managers at the last regular meeting. Following review and discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the revised report be approved. Upon vote the motion carried. The treasurer then distributed his monthly administra- tive fund report dated January 18, 1979, a copy of which is attached. Following discussion it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Williams, that the report be approved and the bills paid as set forth in that report. Upon vote the motion carried. Page Three January 18,; 1979 Minnehaha Creek Floodplain Zoning/City 0.f ~opkins. ~President Coehran repot%ed %ha~ correspondence had been sent from the District to the City of Hopkins expressing the concern of the Managers regarding proposed amendments to the floodplain delineaeion within the City of Hopkins. ~i.ty of Minneapolis Bridge ~roposal. The engineer reported tha~ the City of Minneapolis had indicated its intent to submit to the managers its propos- als for bridge reconstruction and renovation along Minnehaha Creek for concept review by the managers. The managers directed the engineer to advise the City of the applicable District standards regarding such activities. Permit Form Revision. The engineer distributed a revised permit application form pursuant to the direction of the managers at the last regu- lar meeting. Following discussion, further amendments were made to the proposed form and the engineer was directed to resubmit the proposed application form at the next regular meeting of the Managers. Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project. The engineer distributed a memorandum dated January 17, 1979 reflecting a meeting held in the office of the DNR 'Metro Region'Headquarters with the DNR regional hydrologist. The engineer advised the Managers that the status of the work on the new dam and control structure for Gray's Bay were reviewed with the regional hydrologist as well as the current evaluation by the District engineer regarding creek channel characteristics. Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina. The engineer reported that further discussions had occurred with the city engineer of the City of Edina regarding the need to'enter into a written agreement regarding the diver- sion structure at the northeast pond (Southdale) in Edina. The managers directed the attorney to prepare a short written agreement to cover the operation of this diversion on an annual basis by the affected municipality and watershed districts. Page Four January 15, 19 79 EPA Storm Water Treatment Fund Accounting., The president reported that correspondence had been sent to the United States Environmental Protection Agency requesting termination of the existing fund account with EPA. Adjournment. There being no further business to come before the meeting, Chairman Cochran declared the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Albert L. Lehman Acting Secretary 2-8-79 - SPRING PARK WATER Spring Park has suggested an interconnection between the Spring Park and Mound Water Systems. In order for the Council to get a perspective of the two systems, we have drawn together a few statistics for review. Water Production Mound Gallons per Minute Well # 1 400 # 2 Not Operating # 3 450 # 4 750 # 5 250 # 6 1,000 # 7 1,000 3,850 231,000 Gallons per Hour 5,544,000 Gallons per Day Water Storage Mound Gallons Spring Park Gallons Shirley Hills Tank 75,000 Tank 50,000 Highland Tank 300,000 375,000 50,000 The connection between the two lines would have to be made over the Seton Channel or over the Black Lake Channel. The attached map shows the approximate end of each line by an "X". There appears to be about a 600 foot run to connect on County Road 15 and about 700 to 800 feet to connect on County Road 125. In both cases the line would have to be hung on the bridge. The ques- tion then becomes, "can the pipe be kept from freezing, if there is no cir- culation On the line during the Winter"? In all likelihood, a bleeder would have to be on the line to keep it from freezing in the Winter. It is our understanding that the Health Department will not allow a water line to be laid under the Channel. rd L. Kopp cc: Spring Park Spring Park Gallons per Minute Well # 1 240 Well # 2 240 (Spring'Park is considering drilling another well) 480 28,800 Gal.per Hour 691,200 Gal.per Day N LANE .:7 LA. ~ LA AON~ I!r.,~p XaA,' ~'INT :Dj / ./ / :) OI minnesota department of health 717 s.e. delaware st. minneapolis 55440 (612~ 296-5221 t979 City Council c/o Mary H. Mmrske, Clk.-Treas. 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Council Members: We are enclosing a copy of the report of our district office covering an investigation of your municipal water supply, As noted in the report, the city should repair all inoperable or malfunctioning well pumps and chemical feed equipment as soon as possible. At the time of the sanitary survey, only two of six wells were totally operational. One of these wells was being pumped 24 hours per day and the other 14 hours per day. If no additional well pumps are repaired, low pressure problems will continue to occur as demand for water increases. This could jeopardize the sanitary quality of the water being delivered to the consumers. In addition, the average daily water usage greatly exceeds the guideline of providing a minimum of one day water storage capacity. We strongly recommend that consideration be given to the construction of increased water storage facilities. The city should submit a letter to this Department outlining a proposed course of action for dealing with the deficiencies noted in this report. Personnel from this Department are available at any time to assist you concerning this matter. If you have any questions or comments, please communicate with Mr. David Engstrom, Public Health Engineer with this Department. YQhrs very truly, ~ ' ,,~ Ga~"y If." E~glunJ, P.EL, Chief Section o,f Water Supply and General E~gineering CC: Robert Shanley, Water Supt. Dr. K.B. Romness, Health Officer an equal opportunity employer Dz. AR~t.'=,aT OF HEALTH District }'it tro }T, inne~po l:i_s, Minnesota Report on Investigat2on of' lltmicipal Water Supply ~.'.O ll~. 'J , Minnesota 1. Hame. of Uater Sup]',].?£. oys u~.:m Mound Munici¥..al Wat:er Supp].y 2. Plam't Clessii'icaticn c Telephone Nuznb er Clerk (office) Clerk (ho.me) 472-1155 4-72- 2437 Water Supt. (office) !!ater Supt. (home) 472-125! 472-A~88 4. Location (city, county) [5. Person Contacted Mound, Hennepin County i Greg Skinnerz C--reg_D_erq_uist 6. Water Superintmide~--~nd ~iass~ication ]7. Population {8. Date of Survey Robert ShanleF, B o j 9,000 ~ November 21, 1978 9 ~ate~--Pqle~d-ou-s~q~%~4~ [ t0. Population oe~] llfT~ice Connections { 12. ~.mership .... .Au~,ust-30, 1977 [ 8,100 i '2,900 (lead-0) {__m, nicip .z 13. Soured FT~ Plm~foing Coat Wells { ~ Adopted_ ~. Adopted with permits and inspections [_712~ot aaoptei 15. Storage (list separately, indicatii,g capacity-of each) 75,000 - gallon elevated 350,000 - gallon elev'ated 16. Maximzga Daily Consumption 2,500,000 gallons 18. Treatment Used FA Disinfection [~ Aeration ~ Filtration [~ Coagulation ~ Taste and Odor ~ Recar'bonation 19. Well Data.:? a) Well Nomber b) Year Installed c) Casing Diameter d) Casing Depth e) ~.Iell Depth f) Screen I,en~th g) Static Level h) Drawdown chlorine gas 17. Average Daily Const~votion J 1,'750,000 gallons A_',;uaon i ation Softening Sedimentation Fluoridation acid Corrosion Con%to! polyphosphate and Stabilization Other (describe) **t i) Pm.zp (type & cap.) · q'Report well lo,ts on separate sheet, if available. · *inact iw~ Wells · *v:s t andby a~monimum sulphate 140 . , 175f { 194~ --2-- 20. finalytJeal Data A. Bacteriolo[~y I--4~-: Satisfactory - No coliform or/?m~sms were fo~id in the ~amples (see attached analytical data'heat) o ry - Coliform o~,~n ...... found in the -~ Unsatisfact~ ~ ~ .... a [2 analytical c~a'ta sheet). B. Chemical ~ Sameles were collected for chemical examination (see a~t~c~_=d analytical dat~ sheet). No ~ satrap!es were collected for chemical examination at the tine of this investigation. Rating A. ~ %%~is water supply complies substantially with the.standards of the Depar'tmen ~. This }~ater supply does not com~!y entirely with the standards of the " ~ Department. B. 85,.5 Estimated ntnaerical rating of this supply computed on the basis of t00 points for complete co,vmliance (see +'~ ~' ~ . at~~cnea rating sheet). Estimated rating that may be achieved by carrying out the reco_~endations mnder item 22. 22. Re c o~men dati ohs t. Based upon recent complaints of low water pressure and the number of inactive %,~ells on the ~.vo~=~. the city should place high priority on repairs to pumps and chemical feed equipment, A screened l~-inch diameter do~,nturned casing vent extend!x~g at least 24 inches above the floor should be installed on all wells. (Well ~;5) ~ · 3. The pump should be bolted to the pedestal base. (Wells ~{]., ~,~3-~.-65 The polyphosphate injection point should be as far ahe=a of the chlorine injection point as possible, but not on the suction side of thc cb. ack valve. (I. Tel]. fi7) The chemical feed lines for vm!l ~ r7 should be attached to the x~alls in a more efficient P. anner. The drain line for all pt~phouses shall discharge to a gravel pocket located at least 30 feet from 'the wells,. Chlorine rooms should have: a. A louvered air intake located near the ceiling and as far away from the e×haust vent as possible. b. A power exhaust system whose suction should be 6-12 inches above the floor and. whose point of discharge should be to the atmospt~ere at least g feet atove the ground. c. All cylinders chained whether empty of full, 10. 1!. 12. 13. de Switches for the exhaust fan ' ' ~m.~ lights located outside the chlorine room., pre.ferab!y near the inspection ~indo~. Sealed vzalls betvzecn the pun~.phouse and the chlorine room, Undersized r, ains (less th. an 6 inches in c=za~:.]e, ter,: should be replaced as the opportunities present then~se!ves, Ail ~catermmins crossing under railroad tracl:s should be protected t,y a carrier pipe. Underwater crossings should be pressure tested annually. The average daily %,~ater usage greatly exceeds the guideline' of providing a ~.:initnu~ra of one day ~.~ater storage capacity, tTe recozr~?.end 'that a study be conducted to determine the ~,dequacy of 'the syster_,.~, and the possible need for increased ~,,=te storage facilities. All storage tanks should be inspected, cleaned and. disinfected on a regular t';asis.. The overflow of the elevated terser should be extended to ~.~ithin' 12-.14 inches of the ground and be discharged over a ~,u ...... plate· The operator shou~.c~ keep .the following records: 15. 17 a. fluoride added per ~ell (daily), b. chlorine added per ~,~ell (daily), c. static water levels and drax~dow~s from ali. ~el].s, d. fluoride concentrations on the system, and e. chlorine residuals on the system, The stock polyphosphate solution should be dis~_nzecc~a with a free chlorine residual of at least 10 milligran~.s per liter. To. have an. effective fluoridation program, a residual of between 0,9 to 1.5 milligrams per liter should be maintained on the distribution system. The opportunity for additional training in x.zater supply xcork should be made available to the operator. Attendance at the annual ~cater works operators ser.~inars, held in the metropolitan area, is a valuable experience for anyone engaged in chis field. Approved: Ro~r.a~'r'/J. Koch Senior lubJ.,c }:ealth S~,nitarian Section of Environmental Field Services David B, Engstro~.,' P,~. Public Health Engineer Section of Environmental Field Services INNE$OTA DEPARTMENT OF H Section of Water Supply and General Engineering Sanitation Safety Rating of Hound HuUicipa! Water Supply Date. November 21, 1978 Perfect As As' See Reco~.~endet ion No. Score Found Recommended In Attached Report (A~) Source Sanitary Safety ~ 20 20 20 Adequacy of treatment Bacteriological Quality 10 10 10 Physical quality 2 2 2 Chemical quality ~/ 4 2 2 Biological quality 2 2 2 2 Sub-total Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 40 37' (B) Prime Moving Equipment Well or intake 8 o° Pumps ,--" 7 6.5 7 2, Piping arrangement 5 4 5 4,5 Re servoirs 7 7 7 Equipment housing 3 2 3 6,7 Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 30 .27.5 I 30 (C} Distribution System Street mains 5 3 I 5 8,9,10 Building services ~ 2 1.5i ]..5 Plumb ing -~' 3 2.5 i 2.5 Hydrants 1 1 1 Storage 4 2 4 11,12,13 Pressure 2 1 2 Tap .water quality 3 3 I 3 Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total 20 14 19 (D) Operation and Operators Control of system 3 0 3 1,14,15,16 , Condition of system 2 o Operator qualificat ions 5 5 5 17 ................................................ ..... .......... iU ............................................................................................................ Hazard adjustment factor deducted 0 Total. 10 7 10 GRAft~ TOTAL AND RA~TING !00 ~5.5 ~ 97 ...... 90 and upward - high degree of safety. Watchful maintenance needed. 85 to 89 - m~lerately high degree of safety. Correction and maintenance program-continued. 70 to 84 - poor to dangero,~ condition. Prompt corrective action urgently needed. 69 and lower - very dangero~ condition. Emerge'ney measures necessary. 3f3 0 0 0 IV-O> ' u'I i6£6i ' O'~?g V.O> , ' uvv 0 06£6I '0o OS @ slid : -OoC;g ~ tu:)/sOqLUrt *puoO 'oadS uJn!ssP, lOd u~n!po$ ~,OO~0 se uJn!OleO SSV s,~, 'qnS a^p.oV enl~ aUelAq~,elAI usSon!N eiM~.!N sn~oqdsOqd Im, Ol epponl-I 8~eqdlnS aUpOlq3 lenp!saEJ asaue6ueR 8nlra Md ~OOe3 se sseup~eLl ~oto3 Sp!lo$ 1~o3_ ~sa2 piei2~ ;i" '1Lu OOJ, Jsd '3 '::J '~] ; suJs!ue6Jo El 'dcuo3 [3 'u°C) f dnoJ§ 'lW 00 L.)ad 'Fl 'd '~",J LU]OJ!IO~) 'qe-I Aq p~^!aoa~ a~eO -Io a;meJeduJa/ 'G'cl '9~J IIa~i X~UnOD nTdeunai{ 'pnnoi. i · 0.' £[ ' C-~ IIaL'i .~nnog nx. dauueH ' pnno); ',T,'S 'IieH X:~!D X~unoo n.~deuuaH 'punoE JequJnN eldUJeS 'AlUO ash 'qe] ~oj eu!l s!q/ · ~-~ 's2uam~z~dV aszotleaS · ~'~ 'L~ Ilef,i oidLUU$ jo e3JnoS puc ~.u!od §u!ldUJe$ X~unoD u~d~uualt X~unoD uTdauuaH 'puno~l X~unoo uydauu~H 'puno~l '313 'Aiuno~) 'u~ol JaquJnN pla!-J u~Tiodoz]a~.( o±~Jod~u mozJs~ul pTAeG ViVa qVOIIAqVN¥ ijL~VaHqV±N3~NO~IAN3 ~O NOISIAIO V~H~O±N~±HV~Q V±OSBNNI~ /'8 Pa~Oalio3 saldUJeS AiiALYTI ~ ~ C~ DATA Samples ~o!lected Field ~ ' ~ , 19391 Date Rec. by Lab ': [ ,~,acnesi~ a~ CaCO3 ' ~; ~' ~ 200 , , ~ ........... ........ ~". u:.f. <5-0 .............................. m ' "~ :: : -~:~7 i ......... l .... ~6---~- - ~ St: .... ~ fu~:::)nia !iitro~en 'j ..... ............. Lindane u:r/1 / fPO z ~1 _ :.ri: , one ~%~1 } 2,4--1) u,x/1 ~ . I · 'hesu_.to are in Billigr~as per liter except C ! < '-i" Own,.r.__.CiTY Of' MOUND l.cc&ficl; M°u_v/n_d_t M5 nnosota Wcli" ' ': 5~ 11[] , 118 132 $.,.I,. w,.ler level · fool level ...... ~eel. DII!LLEi2'S LOG Bro~un C!~y Gray clay & Gravel Gray cia), & Sand Fine dirLy sand Sand TEST PUMPING DAT.~: 5 75 feel. Pumped 75O CO. Date Februa~'v 11 1977 D ril pcr~R_~ % Ben~ke %:,'ell 'fype: [3 G~avel Pac!re~ WELL ].h[.~;T EP, I ALS 133 .fl. 16 in. diam. oulzr casing in. diam. li:u=r pipo 60 .ft. 16 .in. di~m. zcreon Pk. 300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and l%obert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291-6359 M E M 0 R A N D U M .......... Fe.b~uary 5· 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Metro HRA Participating Communities Mary Anderson,.Ckair, Metro HRA Advisory Committee Special Metro HRA Subcommittee Appointments As you probably already know, Metro HRA has accepted the'request of Brooklyn Park to limit the number of Section 8 assiStance contracts.in that Ci~.y on a temporary basis until January 1, 198~. This means that Certificates of Participation for the Metro HRA Rent Assistance Program will not' be valid in that City-during this period and applicants will need ~to be. informed that rental units in Brooklyn Park-are not eligible for assistance.. The decision to accept t'his request of Brooklyn Park was based on several factors. One· the Metro HRA programs depend on voluntary participation' of communities involved. Two, Brooklyn Park has been the highest achiever in the Section 8 Existing Program. Three,'Brooklyn Park has'achieved over 200% of its three-year allocation plan goal for subsidized housing. In accepting this request of Brooklyn Park, the Metro HRA Advisory Committee was aware that the limitation would affect other participating communities in the Program and could generate some administrative problems. The Metro HRA Advisory Committee is also interested in evaluating the ramifications of relating the participation in the Section 8 Existing Proqr~ to the achievement of Allocation Plan goals. We are acutely aware of the voluntary nature of the Metro HRA. It is dependent upon the cooperation of all participating communities for the successful operation of its programs.. What one community does ~ or does not do can have an effect on the others and on the total program. An Agezicy C',%(;atcd to Coordinate the Planning and De, velopn~ent of the Twin Citi(~s Metropolitan Are~ Con~pr~sing: Anok~ County O Car,;er County O Dakot~ County O Honneoin County O Ramsev County O Scott County o W~hington County -2- Therefore, I am appointing a special subcommittee to investigate these issues that have been raised. This subcommittee will make recommendations to the HRAAdvisory Committee concerning: The effect of placing ceilings on Section 8 assistance in a community; e Alternative ways to avoid over concentrations of low- income housing; Alternatives for issuing - certificates once a community reopens the use of certificates in their City; 4. Other relevant issues. This subcommittee will be made up of 15 members~'~with at least two'members~from theMetro HRA Adv±sory Co~ittee and the remaining majority from participating'.'communities. Your help an nominating members of this sUbco~u~ittee is'needed and wi'~l be appreciated. Community representatives can be staff, appointed or elected officials, or interested citizens.~ We would like people who are interested in housing issues, knowledgable about the Section 8 Program, and can represent the interests and concerns of your community about the Section 8 Program. I would expect the subcommittee to meet several times over the next few months to discuss the issues of concern and to recommend policy alternatives for the full M~tro HRA Advisory Committee to consider. I expect to appoint the members of the subcommittee at the next meeting of the Metro HkA Advisory Committee on February 21, 1979. Please call me at 588-8578 or Phil Katzung at 291-6306 with names of suggested nominees by Monday, February 12,'1979. The deliberations and recommendations of this subcommittee will be very important to the Metro HRA Section 8 Program. Thank you for your help. /vla 3?7 ATTOF~N£Y AT LAW 1 ~03 WASHINGTO~ AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 554~S4 $12/$33-54~ 9 February 5, 1979 Professional Services performed by Timothy L. Piepkorn for the City of ~ound for the month of January: hours 1. January 2, 1979: Arraignments ............................................ 75 2. January 4: Call from Chief, call to the Chief, call from citizen, call to Court ................................................. 75 3. January 5, 1979, meeting with Chief, re: Harry Lund .................... 50 4. January 10:2 calls from citizens, call to Court, prepared 2 Formal Complaints ............................................... 2.001 5. January 12: Letter to Mary Marske .................................... 25 6. January 16; 2 Court Trials,-1 Pre-trial conference ................... 2.50 7. January 17:2 calls from citizens, call from Linda, call from Court, meeting with Citizen, ........................................................ .2.50 8. January 18:3 calls from citizens, call to Court ...................... 75 9. January 19, 1979:2 calls from Public Defender, call to Judge ............. 50 10. January 22: letter to Linda .......................................... 25 ll. January 23: Prepared Formal ComPlaint ................................. 75 12. January 30:3 Pre-trials, 1 Court Trial ............................. 2.25 TOTAL OWING .......................................................... $300.00 13.75. ON L..~K,E: MINNL~I'ONKA INDIAN I3URIAL MOUNDS 5343 MAYWOOD ROAD TELEPHONE MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 {612) 472-1155 Mr. William Mooers Insurance Service Office of.Minnesota 12 South 6th Street Minneapqlis, MN. 55401 Dear Mr. Mooers: The City of Mound now has a Class 6 rating for fire insurance purposes and we are anxious to go to a lower rating. It is our opinion that a Class 5 rating is now possible and we would greatly appreciate your scheduling the City of Mound for a rating examination at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, ...... 'Leonard L, K~p' City Manager LLK/m$ cc: City Council Fire Chief M. David DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST PAUL DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS 113S U. S POST OFFICE & CUSTOIIA HOUSE ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA ATTENT I'ON OF~ NCSCO-GR (79-114-12/VF 77-96-16) Exp. Date: 8 February 1979 12 March 1979 NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR PERMIT After-the-Fact 1. The Upper Tonka Little League, Inc., proposes to retain approximately 4,200 cubic yards of fill material placed in Lost Lake, a wetland adjacent to Lake Minnetonka, in the SW¼ of sec. 13, T. 117 N., R. 24 W., Hennepin County, Minnesota. This fill material was placed in June 1977 to complete a second baseball field. The first field and a portion of this second field were filled in 1953. The total fill area for the two fields is approximately 500 feet by 300 feet with the recent fill area being approxi- mately 125 feet by 300 feet. .2. The above completed work requires the issuance of an individual Depart- ment of the Army permit under the authority of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, the evaluation of the activity on the public interest will include the application of the guidelines promulgated by the Administrator, EPA, under the authority of Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act. 3. The attached drawings and the information cited below were submitted by the applicant and form the basis of our preliminary evaluation. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: P.O. Box 405 Mound, Minnesota 55364 PHONE NUMBER: AGENT: (612) 472-3102 Mr. Walter K. Jarl Treasurer ADDRESS: 3740 Togo Road Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 PHONE NUMBER: (612) 472-3102 NAME AND DESCRIPTION OF JURISDICTIONAL WATER: Lost Lake is a Type III wetland adjacent to Lake Minnetonka which serves as a catch basin and filtering area for runoff water entering Lake Minnetonka,. QUANTITY AND TYPE OF FILL: Approximately 4,200 cubic yards of sand and dirt was used to complete the fill for the second baseball field° In the 125-foot by 300-foot area the fill averages approximately 3 feet deep. NCSCO-GR(79-114-12/VF 77-96-16) SUBJECT: Notice of Application for Permit - After-the,Fact 8 February 1979 DESCRIPTION OF VEGETATION IN AREATO BE FILLED: Sumac, cattails, smart- weed and sedges are present in the fill area. SOURCE OF FILL MATERIAL: The fill material was obtained from the excava- ticn for nearby homes and businesses and from local road construction. SURROUNDING LAND USE TYPES (AT PROJECT SITE): The area surrounding the ball field is commercial and industrial. PROJECT COST: Approximately $9,000. CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED: The fill completing the second ball field was placed in the summer of 1977. THE FOLLOWING STATE AND/OR LOCAL PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR: A Minnesota Department of Natural Resources permit has been issued and approval has been granted by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the city of Mound, Minnesota. NO ALTERNATIVES to the project as proposed were identified by the applicant. However, the Corps of Engineers, through the public interest review will, if appropriate, endeavor to identify and evaluate possible alternatives to the project. 4. This Public Notice has been sent to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and'is considered by the District Engineer to constitute valid notification to that agency for water quality certification~:' ' 5. Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. 6. We have conducted a preliminary environmental review based principally on the information provided by the permit applicant. Based on our review, we have determined that an environmental impact statement will not be prepared. This determination may be reversed, if warranted, as a result of information provided by Federal, State and local agencies, comments from the public, and any new information brought to light. 7. This public notice has been sent to the National Park Service, the State Archaeologist, and the State Historic Preservation Officer to determine if there are known cultural resources which may be affected by the described work. Presently unknown archaeological, scientific, or historical data may be lost or destroyed by work described in the permit application. The latest version of the National Register of Historic Places has been consulted and no listed properties (known to be eligible for inclusion, or included in the Register) are located in the project area. 2 NCSCO-GR(79-114-12/VF 77-96-16) 8 February 1979 SUBJECT: Notice of Application for Permit - After-the-Fact 8. No endangered or threatened wildlife or plants, or thei~ critical habilat, were listed by the applicant or are known to exist in the project area. This application is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife ~5ervic~ the National Marine Fisheries Service. Any comments they may have regarding endangered or threatened wildlife or plants, or their critical habitat, will be considered in our final assessment of the dcscrib~d 9. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact of the described work on the public interest. That decisl0n will reflect the national concern for both protection and use of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be ~xpected to accrue from th~ work must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeabi~ detriments. Ail factors which may be relevant to the work will be considered; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental conce~s, historic values, fish and wildlife values, flood damage prevention, land use, navigations, recreation, water supply, water quality, energy needs, safety, food producth~n and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. No permit will be granted unless its issuance is found ~o be in the public interest. Ail environmental documents, including the final environmental assessment, will be available for review for 45 days after the date of this notice. Anyone wishing to review these documents may contact the District Engineer at the address below. 10. Interested parties are invited to submit to this office written facts, arguments, or objections within 30 days of the date of this notice. These statements should bear upon the suitability of the location, the adequacy of the plans and should, if appropriate, suggest any changes thought desirable. 11. Ail replies should be addressed to the District Engineer, St. Paul District, Corps of Engineers, 1135 U.S. Post Office and Custom House, St. Paul, Minnesota 5510%, ATTENTION: General Regulatory Branch. i'OR THE DISTRICT ENGINEER: 1 Incl As stated WM. L. GOETZ ~_~ , Chief, Construction-Operations Division 3 Z Z 3,?'/ · ,o_,.. }::;.,'.,f-'~'.'l_._~ .~ - ' ~"~' '%'P'::'z'.'b'.'-~"'~,r' ,~' ~" ,'s ' - ' ~ ,','- ' ',,/ ' T~ ~o 1' ~ ~ -~o ", 'x ' ~-'-"~' ' D,,t~, -,, '-' ~.~. .. /~-..-, ~7 - ¢~ .' ~' .--"'--~ ~ ~ .L -~ .. ~. \ ,~o,,,,.,, .... ~ :'.~ . ";", '-'. . -.~ · - ~ ..... ~... . >".~ x,... x.~...,.' . . %'x~._:,.._~_.._,o~..~.:' ~:. x ~ .... :..:'::. ~_:. ~ '. : . ( : . 'X ,',,,..<'... ..~. ,/ ~ ,----7~.'~%-~,.'C~ ~/~- .... .' ' ' ~' " "' -- '.. -~>-- -. -- -- (..:k- · d:.. ~_ :1¥_~,~...-.....uZ...? ....... ". 'I/ /. ~, -. -.~.'--..~-1:.:,,/ r'~z_L ~ .-a,-~.~,'.-~ :..y 0. · _ .: ........ ~ .... -,11~ ~ .. . ..-,, , _ -.t.J ... 'i.' .. ~.~._,.~ .._.~.. · ...... r-:.,~ '-.-i.:.: .... :...". ;.'.',_./...I. 1 ,,:: .... ., ~ , I .- ..,--,,, ~'I_. - _ . . .~_ ... . .... ,... _- -~ ,. . ..... , _., _ ° -.~ - ~ · ':, ~ .-.,~':. g ~-:--~,--= ~ ;z~,-::.~'----~---7- .--./--.-'.-?~?: :'..'. --.~.~-1.--/ ..~'. :-.--.-..-7. · %,. ..... · , _ · ..-.~-~ .v~. ' ,I '-r-- . d$$2' /3-*~Z---~ , .I ' ., .' · J~ ..... ~ .... '.'" ~ .... ' ,/. '~ ~'~.--';- ...,.~"~'-,.-'--~'-"~; .... "~ -"~--,~.~:t-~.._._~-' -s ; ,~: · ,.e · . ..... C'/-- ,-';' "-"" c-'. ' .... :~-::. ~ ; ~j~ _. '1,, , '' {?,'~-~" .--'-. . / ,,.<.'Mound .,~----- ,-_ ::' '.,,- ' ~ I -'..-'~-',, . .~..~'/:..c.'.'. i '-.' ~ j! %, ;.:.~: ! %' ~ .",; ', i" - ---.sisH~- ~a~k -'~ ..'L '-'x", J- - - 'l o, ' '~ '~ [:~ -- -" il- ~ .*,0,1 _ J ~ A n'I~' I I; '-' "H J ' %% /--' /.~-~F ' -- ,;~ - "~ 0 /"~e* .o..t' ~ ' tu ~ : · _ . ', ' ~ +..~- ~' , \~ ..... ~ ~ ' · ' -.~o' ",~" · -,4.,' ' "'' "",- I"x~._.3\ '/t '~,x. .--., ,-m-. ..... · ...... ----~ -.~, · ~ ."/' . ',. ~;'"~. ~/ t~,lack Lake - /'Fx ~: t../. 'o ~ "~ ~ ~ '~ - '- '*" "--~ - - ~i' ~kl ¥ ) 0 .~, '~.-.~'', I · '~ ~.-%: ~--'- '- ...... -~. ' .... ... ,/ ' t ' \",~"J , ~. .&r~' j. ~_..._,.'_:, '~, i F.~.'._" '-,~'~' ¥'....td.:,..,. '. ,-,'/"1 .---, I'. .;.x~' ~-x,~'.J': :'. '-' -'.~ ~1 '_~' ..z_~'.~.'J, _ .... >;~"-'£...' ~1 + · Phe~ [':';":"~'~7~'tt!; .... '' /'"'-' / IIPelican' . --~.~. o o, _ .~ ,.-., ~--~,.r~-=// ' / -'~--~ · . · ~ . - "; 0 ,5. , ' o .... -- .~'."-~?:~ ..... ~' ',. '~ ...... · ..... .--.- .... --'"~' ~7~ -.:. · ' / ...... ... -,,.. ,, · ~. ...... ..-,-~ ;t_C..., ?a k ~,,--..; ~ f~-./,,~ ~ _ · - ...... m _,,.-~--_..~t ..--'~_,~,j /~. -' .' .- .. · · ~-- ~.. 7 -' · ,,.> · ' ~'.,.~/ . - .... ~O,a .- '- - ...... .' "- .. ->-; X '~"' -'9.' ' ~' ' .... ~-:->,'.. .... ~_ !r-~Tq,,.. '?' _~ ..-.. - ~'~ · '~ ' ' -~ i.e~ ' ·: ..... ,-" -~,~.",,,_ '-- -. ' . ~','~ 't ~' . . .. ·: -:...: . - ,..-;..'.-..,~.. ...... -..--~ · ~~* ~T. II7N,R.24W/-:'"'", .... .:-.~'>" ,o I ' -;o~o_'~' ':" ;, .----~_~? ' -~d' -~.'.,x,"o-_~o. X ',, .~ - ~!:~ .... '-' .~---~ _.--~ ~- ' ~ ' ..- ~'.%,' ~q~~-<x HENN£PIN COUN.T.'.¥:.' -:' -t~. ----. 'xk v ix. -; ) .&<~\)x · Ceoar Po nt - '. "'-'"" -" · /? ~$ I -~' ~'~ - ' ' '~o ' ~ x'""O ~'' ~-~' "...' ;_..... ' --'... Cur -- '-. ....... -~-" . .. ,o '~\ ,';' ~ ,~'7..~" ~'/ 'L'..'2~.~ I ~ · \ .-'~'~,. · ' ', ' ~-~ ~' / ' ' . ; ...... , -- ~'~ '- ~'x · ._?.~.- . ... I -,, _~, .%... . , . . .... . , ..x ....... , T;' ....-.-',-: -: .., · ....... ,. ,,.. _'o."... / ,.,. . .- ,. ' . ' -o., .... .' h ~ ' ~ x~ ~"~,.,,',..-' .-'..x ~ 'j ~;~ \~.'o · s '--""~o -' .. -.... , ,: x.' '~,~~~-~ '\ ', !IIHL.._...'~. ' .- . ., ,--.'...-.. :· -''',''. · ,.' ? ... ," ; ,, ~,~._ -,, ./(. L;:.~.~--..q. ' . . I ..-' ..-" .,-- ". .... -__.-.. ._ .~,,,;~..'.] ' . ·... . ..... ,. , , .. ZL.. ' ' · . ~ .,'...1~ . ,,~--~.<_. I .'- .--. ....?'~~,: '.27 ~~ '~'=-,.,.o~ \( .... .,- :,~-,_ ...... .~ ~k)/ .~ /' ~\ .,:.t.'-'._,'-'~c,... -"_J_ ,~ _,/ ~x_ I · ,',/.;-~--' "~.. .- " t- ~ i ~ /x · ..'~o-- ' · .'¢.' _:;~ ~~ 17,'I,'.:Z~'. ~.,.. · ~.~. L_,, .~ : !, O,. 't .-'.~ "~ '° -" ' .o~ ' --~,~"°-- ' ./'.,! '~,o° ':' ~ J ~- l,- .~ \(. \ 1' -' ...~ ~. -,, . .__:... . .x. _--~.J,) ~ .- /f..--'.(i / . x" /_' s-' (_~ ,.. contour interval ~o feet ,;, ~,,x,~_~_~X~w:l~-~-i ..... -~.,-~+x_.._.~_~_ '-: ~ Yf .. · ,. o^,~. ,s .e.. se,, ~eve~ .," Il ,.%0? ~ _ ; ~;~ ."l:-.:' .... · - ....................... ' ............ ~"' "":?,Wi I~t L L ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Permit Application Number: 99-~1M- I~ NAME OF PARAMETER :A. SOCIAL EFFECTS 1. Historical Values 2~ ArchaeOlogical Values 3..~oise Level~ 4. Aesthetic Values 5. Recreational 6. Transportation. ?, public Health and Safety 8, Community Growth and Cohesion Population Displacement 11. ExistinR/PptDn.tial Land' !2, C.ontroversy PROBABLE IMPACT BENEFICIAL Substantial Minor No Appreciable Effect Unknow~l .. ADVERSE Minor Substantial NoBe Anticipated.. ECONOMIC EFFECTS 1,. Property Values 2.. Tax Revenues _ 4, Energy Needs Empla_~mmnt...,. 7. Busi~ess'A.cti~itv 8. Food Production 10. Com~erciai Navigation X x NATURAL P. ESOURCE EFFECTS 1. Existin etation 2. Terrestrial Habitat e Aquatic Habitat Habitat Diversity and Biological Productivity 6. Wetland see Water Gro~L~dwater Oualitv .. 9. Water Supply Soil Erosion ~nd Siltati~ 12. Threatened or Endangered Species' NCS Form 81-2 {test) 13 A~r 78 37o° January Dear The attached info. marion is to inCoPm and update you about the Community Food and Nutrition Pro3ect which has begun in the West Hennepln area,, As p~o3ect coordinator, I am enthusiasc'~c about the project's Implications and possible a~fect.s on the low-income population in the West Henmepin a'P~a . Presenb!y, I am or~anizln~ in~er~st~d pe'ople fo~ the food nutrition action council which is described in more detail in ~h~ £ollo,~z!~ paf~e~o H~weve.-, b%~o small action Erou~s ~are beinM or~anized immediately ~o addrems nutPitionaI needs of the eide~ly and £ood s~amp p~og~am chanMes and imp!ice,ions fo~ the communiby. If you are p~sonally int~rested~ or know oC someone who would be, please contac~ me a% West IIennepin Human Services at 920-5533° Your cooperation is most appreciated. I will be keeping you up-to-date on the project's progress. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Fam Nelson 377 hennepln L uman West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board 41 O0 Vernon Avenue South St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 920-5533 COMMUNITY FOOD AND NUiTRITION PROJECT Effective November l, 1978, the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board began a Community Food and Nutrition project in cooperation with the South Hennepin Human Services Council, the Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council and Scott-Carver Economic Council. The project is funded~for nine months by the Federal Community Services .Administration and is a Community Action Program. Goals The overall goals of the project are the same for each of the four council areas, however, each area will function independently and will focus on special local issues regarding food and nutrition. The primary objective of the Community Food and Nutrition project is to establish a citizens advocacy council in each geographic area. The citizen's advocacy council will not only assess the existing food and nutrition programs in terms of their accessibility a~nd appropriateness to West Hennepin residents but will also seek to solve local problems concerning food and nutrition issues by promoting alternatives and needed reform. The councils will include representatives of numerous groups concerned about food and nutrition such as: Seniors, persons on fixed incomes, city and elected officials, agricultural workers, etc. For the nine month duration of the project, the advocacy co6ncils will work with a staff person from each planning board. Following that, the strength of the advocacy councils will be such that they will continue as esta- blished community groups. Role of the Community Advocacy Council One of the primary issues to be addressed during the course of the project is the impact of the change in food stamp regulations which will be im- plemented partially December 1 and finally March 1o It is anticipated that extensive community education will be required to help current and potential recipients understand the impact the new regulations will have on their participation in the program. Likewise, public awareness of other available food and nutrition programs will be stressed. 37/ -2- It is expected that each of the four geographic areas will have different community issues to address within each citizens advocacy council but generally along with specific community issues, each area will address some of the following tasks: 1. Build coalitions with other organizations and agencies involved in food and nutrition planning. 2. Advocacy for more and better delivery and accessibility of needed food and nutrition services to target groups. B. Surveys regarding food and nutrition. 4. Securing more effective outreach both through existing agencies and the development of Public Service Employment projects to expand participation Of the poor in established food programs. 5. Arranging training and providing technical assistance for developing food buying clubs and food co-ops as needed. 6. Establishment of a means to monitor food and nutrition programs. 7. Working with churches and other community groups in establishing and maintaining area food banks. 8. Recruiting volunteers to assist in the distribution of HEW, USDA, and the State Food Stamp Office leaflets, brochures, etco 9. Working with area grocer associations and farmers to pro- mote grea'ter acceptance of the food stamp program by the public. 10. Other issues and tasks as defined by the advocacy council. Staffing and Organization Scott-Carver Economic Council is the grantee for the project; coordination is a joint effort by all four agencies. The entire Community Food and Nutrition Project staff will meet regularly during the project period to develop joint training, share information, solve problems, and monitor the overall success of the project. In the West Hennepin area, Pam Nelson will coordinate the project. Everybody in Minnesofa has pJenty of good food to eat. Right? · - - Wrong . ~ . ·%:! · Oni'-¥ ~ fraction of those eligible for Supplom;ntal food pr&grams ....... such as food stamps and WIC use them · Man9 people on fixed incomes skimp on their food 15udget--becaus~:.' it's tho only place they can cut. · People from all income levels know little about'good nutrition and i±s impact on health · Parents frequently don't know what their'children are getting in school lunches--or whether it's good for them. Food and nutrition issues affect all of us--young, old, and in-between. What can we do to improve people's access to nutritious food]..to educate the public and ourselves about good nutrition...to work to better the health of our own communities? A Food and Nutrition Advocacy Council is being formed in your area. If you are concerned about adequate foo~ and good nutrition for all Minne- sotans--as a consumer, a participant in government food programs, a health ~r social service professional, or for any other reason--this Council is for you. You can: 1) 2) 3) 4) Express your concerns Find out how to get answers to your.food and nutrition questions Work in a small action group on an 'ssue that's important to you Become an active member of the Advocacy Council. C^'L: 920--5533 Pam Nelson West Hennepin Food and Nutrition Advocacy Council 41sf and Vernon S. St. Louis Park, MN 55416