The URL can be used to link to this page

2017-08-22 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at areasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community, AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2017 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent A e� nda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. Opening meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent A e nda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff, recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence. Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate. 4. *Consent A eg nda page *A. Approve payment of claims 2254-2276 *B. Approve Minutes: 8-8-17 Regular Meeting 2277-2281 *C. Approve a resolution authorizing 2017 Central Business District (CBD) 2282-2288 parking maintenance roll to be certified to the County Auditor at 5% 2282 interest - Levy #19677 *D. Approve a resolution amending and restating Resolution No. 17-104 2289-2290 Resolution approving State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements with the 2290 City of Mound on behalf of its prosecuting attorney *E. Approve Resolution of Support from the City of Mound for the Minnehaha 2291-2295 Creek Watershed District Watershed Management Plan 2294 *F. Approve Resolution approving Variance for 2025 Lakeside Lane 2296-2318 2297 *G. Approve Resolution amending and restating Resolution No. 16-124 2319-2366 approving Variances for 4804-4820 Northern Road 2321 *H. Approve Resolution approving Variance for 2039 Arbor Lane 2367-2386 2368 *I. Approve Resolution approving Variance for 3231 Gladstone Lane 2387-2407 2391 *J Approve Resolution approving Variance and Expansion Permit for 2408-2438 2060 Waterside Lane 2410 PLEASE TURN-OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. *K. Approve Resolution awarding contract for the 2017 Retaining Wall 2439-2440 Improvement Project to Barber Construction in the amount of $258,355, 2440 City Project No. PW -17-04 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, with an 2441-2447 overview of the 2018 Preliminary Budget and Levy and requesting action on the following resolutions: A. Action on Resolution Approving Changes to Debt Service Levy Schedules 2441 and to appropriate funds in the debt service fund for Bond Series 2015B & 2016A B. Action on Resolution Approving a Levy not to Exceed $218,404 for the 2445 Purpose of Defraying the Cost of Operation, Pursuant to the Provisions of MSA 469, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound for the Year 2018 C. Action on Resolution Approving the 2018 Preliminary General Fund Budget 2446 in the amount of $5,614,463; Setting the Preliminary Levy at $5,704,456; and Approving the Preliminary Overall Budget for 2018 D. Mayor Wegscheid announcing: The 2018 Final Budget and Levy discussions and decisions will take place at the Dec 12, 2017 Regular Meeting, at 7:00 pm, in the Council Chambers. Public comments will be taken at this meeting. Comments or questions on the 2018 Budget and Levy can be directed to the Finance Director at 952-472-0633. ** Also see separate budget packet sent on Aug 10, 2017 7. City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten presenting discussion and 2448-2450 recommendations of the Public Works Committee regarding removal of proposed pathway/trail elements from 2018 Street and Utility Improvement Project. 8. Conduct a closed session pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b) to engage in an attorney-client privileged discussion with the City's attorney regarding the 4837 Bedford Road hazardous building matter currently being litigated. 9. Information/Mi scellaneous A. Comments/Reports from Council members B. Reports: Fire Department - July 2017 2451-2454 Liquor Store - July 2017 2455 Finance Department - July 2017 2456-2458 C. Minutes: Planning Comm Minutes July 18, 2017 2459-2467 D. Correspondence: Center Point Energy Rate Change Filing - August 8, 2017 10. Adjourn August 22, 2017 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! 24 August - 4 September - State Fair 4 September - Labor Day 5 September - Westonka Schools resume 9 September - Running of the Bays 12 September - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 12 September - 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 16 September - Mound -Tree Trust Tree Sale Tree Pick-up Day City Snow Barn Lot on Lynwood 26 September - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 26 September - 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 10 October - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 10 October - 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 17 October - 6:30 PM - Council Special Meeting Workshop 24 October - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 24 October - 2017 - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting City Offices Closed 4 September 2017 - Labor Day City Official's Absences Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Some votes require more than a simple majority and Staff needs to plan accordingly. Inquire in advance, please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision- making. City of • • Claims 8-22-17 'TEAR BATCH NAME 2017 AUG17UBREFND $ 1,962.16 2017 PAYREQ08081711,1344.04 2017 1 9,664.00 2017 0717JUBILEE $ 171.44 2017 082217CITY15 ,197.52 2017 082217HWS $ 109,822.19 SIE283,161.35 -2254- Current Period: August 2017 08/17/17 12:21 PM Page 1 Batch Name AUG17UBREFND User Dollar Amt $1,962.16 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $1,962.16 $0.00 In Balance Refer 4 CLEAR TITLE LLC Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5444 SPRUCE RD- JEN WHEELER- UTILITY $9.84 REFUND- CLEAR TITLE LLC Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9.84 Refer 1 CUSTOM NOME BUILDERS TITLE Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2140 GRANDVIEW CT- ALBERT VLACH $527.84 ETAL- UTILITY REFUND- CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS TITLE Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $527.84 Refer 2 EDINA REALTY TITLE Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4744 HAMPTON RD -T. NEWGARD- UTILITY $222.78 REFUND- EDINA REALTY TITLE Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $222.78 Refer 12 GEIGER, CAROL Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2206 MILLPOND LN- UTILITY REFUND- $27.30 CAROL GEIGER Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $27.30 Refer 8 GIBRALTER TITLE AGENCY-BLMG Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5100 GLENDALE RD- CRAIG DARCY- $130.33 UTILITY REFUND-GIBRALTER TITLE AGENCY BLMGT Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.33 Refer 3 LIBERTY TITLE INC. - ANOKA Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 5570 TONKAWOOD RD- A. MEHDIZADEH- $59.56 UTILITY REFUND- LIBERTY TITLE ANOKA Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $59.56 Refer 9 MINNESOTA TITLE- BURNSVILLE Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 4518 MANCHESTER- DOUG MACGIBBON- $95.18 UTILITY REFUND- MINNESOTA TITLE- BURNSVILLE Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.18 Refer 5 MINNETONKA TITLE, INC. Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2320 CHATEAU LN- MARY JECH- UTILITY $206.25 REFUND- MINNETONKA TITLE, INC Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $206.25 Refer 10 PARTNERS TITLE -2255- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 12:21 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 1649 GULL LN- UTILITY REFUND- MICHAEL SCHLAERTH $0.38 Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $0.38 Refer 7 TITLE SMART INC, WOODBURY Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2600 TYRONE LN- ANDREW DANIELSON- $316.70 UTILITY REFUND- TITLE SMART INC- WOODBURY Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $316.70 Refer 6 WATERMARK TITLE AGENCY LLC Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2130 NOBLE LN- JENNIFER SMITH- UTILITY $11.08 REFUND- WATERMARK TITLE Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11.08 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 601 WATER FUND $1,962.16 $1,962.16 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $1,962.16 Total $1,962.16 Current Period: August 2017 Batch Name PAYREQ080817 User Dollar Amt $11,344.04 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $11,344.04 Refer 2 BRAUN INTERTEC Cash Payment E 401-43137-300 Professional Srvs $0.00 In Balance CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING 2017 STREET IMPROV PROJECT- PW 17-02 Invoice 8098553 7/20/2017 Project PW1602 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 1 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA /N Cash Payment E 401-43116-300 Professional Srvs LANDSCAPE REPAIR WORK @ 5024 BARTLETT BLVD- THORTENSON- 2016 STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 16-01 Invoice 32823 7/10/2017 Project PW1601 Cash Payment E 401-43116-300 Professional Srvs LANDSCAPE REPAIR WORK @ 4815 BARTLETT BLVD- JOHNSON- 2016 STREET IMPROV PROD PW 16-01 Invoice 32822 7/7/2017 Cash Payment E 401-43116-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 32821 7/7/2017 Cash Payment E 401-43116-300 Professional Srvs Project PW1601 LANDSCAPE REPAIR WORK @ 4841 BARTLETT BLVD- KOTTEMANN- 2016 STREET IMPROV PROD PW 16-01 Project PW1601 LANDSCAPE REPAIR WORK @ 5085 BARTLETT BLVD- REGAN- 2016 STREET IMPROV PROD PW 16-01 08/17/17 12:45 PM Page 1 $5,557.54 $5,557.54 $1,522.50 $1,659.00 $1,810.00 $795.00 Invoice 32855 7/26/2017 Project PW1601 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,786.50 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $11,344.04 $11,344.04 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $11,344.04 Total $11,344.04 -2257- CITY OF MOUND 08/14/17 3:33 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $9,664.00 Total $9,664.00 -2258- CITY OF MOUND 08/03/17 3:26 PM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Batch Name 0717JUBILEE User Dollar Amt $171.44 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $171.44 $0.00 In Balance Refer 45 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R FRESH LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $32.00 Invoice 073117-2 7/4/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R BOTTLED WATER FOR RESALE- HWS $24.95 Invoice 073117-2 7/8/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies BOTTLED WATER- FIREMEN- $31.73 Invoice 073117-2 7/16/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-431 Meeting Expense POP & WATER- FIRE COMMISSION MTG 7- $18.76 26-17 Invoice 073117-2 7/26/2017 Transaction Date 8/3/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $107.44 Refer 44 JUBILEE FOODS Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R FRESH LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $29.50 Invoice 073117 7/18/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R FRESH LIMES & LEMONS FOR RESALE $34.50 Invoice 073117 7/25/2017 Transaction Date 8/3/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $50.49 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $120.95 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $171.44 Total $171.44 $171.44 -2259- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Batch Name 082217CITY User Dollar Amt $150,197.52 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $150,197.52 Refer 25 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSO Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training Invoice 082217 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training Invoice 082217 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training Invoice 082217 8/8/2017 $0.00 In Balance ANNUAL CONFERENCE REG- AMERICAN $245.00 WATERWORKS ASSOC- DULUTH 9-12 THRU 9-15-17- R. HANSON ANNUAL CONFERENCE REG- AMERICAN $245.00 WATERWORKS ASSOC- DULUTH 9-12 THRU 9-15-17- R. PRICH ANNUAL CONFERENCE REG- AMERICAN $245.00 WATERWORKS ASSOC- DULUTH 9-12 THRU 9-15-17- B. KRESS Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $735.00 Refer 1 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic WELL #3 ONSITE PROGRAMMING SVCS 7- 19-17 Invoice 31981 8/3/2017 $358.90 Transaction Date 8/14/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $358.90 Refer 2 BENDICKSON, WES Cash Payment E 101-43100-224 Street Maint Materials STREET SWEEPINGS DUMPED 5-19-17 & 5- $675.00 25-17, 6-9-17, 6-22-17 & 7-14-17 - 9 LOADS @ $75 EA Invoice 082217 8/4/2017 Transaction Date 8/14/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $675.00 Refer 3 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material CLASS 2 RIP RAP MATERIALS 3.52 TON $106.66 Invoice 23457 7/31/2017 Transaction Date 8/14/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $106.66 Refer 4 CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC. Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 7293267 7/25/2017 PO 24745 Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 7293267 7/25/2017 PO 24745 6 ELECTRODES FOR DEFIBRILLATION AED 6 ELECTRODES FOR DEFIBRILLATION AED $97.62 $97.62 Transaction Date 8/14/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $195.24 Refer 5 CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC. Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 7293720 7/31/2017 PO 24750 Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 7293720 7/31/2017 PO 24750 Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 7295182 8/14/2017 PO 24750 2 AED DEFIBRILLATOR UNITS, CARRYING $1,292.62 CASES & ADULT ELECTRODE PADS 2 AED DEFIBRILLATOR UNITS, CARRYING $1,292.62 CASES & ADULT ELECTRODE PADS PEDIATRIC ELECTRODE PADS FOR AED $112.50 UNITS -2260- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/1711:14 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 101-42115-210 Operating Supplies PEDIATRIC ELECTRODE PADS FOR AED $112.50 UNITS Invoice 7295182 8/14/2017 PO 24750 Transaction Date 8/14/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,810.24 Refer 6 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (M/NNEG Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 6-20-17 TO 7-20-17 $43.83 Invoice 082217 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 6-20-17 TO 7-20-17 $43.83 Invoice 082217 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 6-20-17 TO 7-20-17 $58.78 Invoice 082217 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 6-20-17 TO 7-20-17 $481.73 Invoice 082217 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 6-20-17 TO 7-20-17 $50.27 Invoice 082217 8/9/2017 Project 17-3 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 6-20-17 TO 7-20-17 $25.38 Invoice 082217 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 6-20-17 TO 7-20-17- DEPOT BLDG $32.60 Invoice 082217 8/9/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $736.42 Refer 7 CENTRAL MCGOWAN, INCORPOR Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies HIGH PRESSURE CYLINDER RENTAL 2017 $34.72 Invoice 00093068 7/31/2017 Project 17-3 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $34.72 Refer 44 CUTTERS EDGE -FIRE RESCUE SA Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair CHOKE CONTROL, CHOKE GROMMET- FIRE $10.98 TRUCK Invoice 081017-3 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair BULLET CHAIN SHARPENING- FIRE DEPT $39.80 Invoice 080817-3 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.78 Refer 8 DA VES MULCH STORE u Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material PLAYGROUND CONTRACTORS MULCH $2,430.00 Invoice 13259 7/6/2017 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material PLAYGROUND CONTRACTORS MULCH $2,430.00 Invoice 13348 7/11/2017 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material NORTHERN WHITE CEDAR CONTRACTORS $80.00 MULCH Invoice 13434 7/18/2017 Transaction Date 8/6/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,940.00 Refer 11 DOCKMASTERS OF LAKE M/NNET Cash Payment E 101-45200-440 Other Contractual Servic SVC CALL @ SURFSIDE LAUNCH- & 12 12, $120.50 POSTS Invoice 203091 8/1/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.50 Refer 9 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. -2261- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Invoice 74183 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $500.00 Refer 48 FIRE CHIEF, MN STATE ASSOCIAT Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training 2017 ANNUAL CONFERENCE $300.00 REGISTRATION- G. PEDERSON Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 PO 24751 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $300.00 Refer 10 FIRSTLAB Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services Invoice FL00179608 8/7/2017 DOT RANDOM URINE DRUG SCREEN $50.95 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.95 Refer 12 FRONTIER/CITIZENS COMMUNICA E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $217.21 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 E 101-41930-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $124.54 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $217.21 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 E 101-41910-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $223.79 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 LIFT $39.89 STATION LINE 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $300.38 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 Cash Payment E 101-41930-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $443.42 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $147.81 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 Cash Payment E 101-41910-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $73.91 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PHONE SVC -7-30-17- TO 8-29-17 $73.91 Invoice 082217 7/30/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,862.07 Refer 13 GILLESPIE CENTER Cash Payment E 101-41115-430 Miscellaneous SENIOR SVCS AGREEMENT SUPPORT $30,000.00 DONATION - GILLESPIE CENTER 1 ST HALF 2017 PYMT Invoice 082217 6/27/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30,000.00 Refer 14 GREEN WITH ENVY LAWN CARE, l Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic WEED CONTROL SPRAY CITY SIDEWALKS- $935.00 2ND APPLICATION- 2017 Invoice 248746 7/29/2017 -2262- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 4 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $935.00 Refer 15 HAWKINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals 150 LB CHLORINE CYLINDERS- WELL #8 $475.57 EVERGREEN Invoice 4122974 7/28/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals 150 LB CHLORINE CYLINDERS- WELL #3 $475.57 CHATEAU Invoice 4122980 7/28/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $951.14 Refer 45 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 8 QTY 3/4 " WATER METERS & 100 RUBBER $1,008.87 MTR WASHERS Invoice H607761 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,008.87 Refer 16 HENNEPIN COUNTY /NFORMATIO Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PW RADIO LEASE & ADMINISTRATION FEE - $152.48 JULY 2017 Invoice 1000096889 8/2/2017 Project 17-3 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIRE DEPT RADIO LEASE & $1,161.55 ADMINISTRATION FEE - JULY 2017 Invoice 1000096824 8/2/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,314.03 Refer 17 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Cash Payment E 475-46386-438 Licenses and Taxes 2016 PROPERTY TAX ON DONATED PARCEL- $60.78 #13-117-24-33-0004 Invoice 082217 8/2/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.78 Refer 18 JB SOD FARMS Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 15 ROLLS OF SOD $60.00 Invoice 399191 7/11/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60.00 Refer 19 JESSEN PRESS INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41110-350 Printing PRINT, MAIL -CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER- $1,475.00 AUG, SEPT, OCT 2017 6,200 COPIES Invoice 676630 8/10/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,475.00 Refer 20 LAKE RESTORATION, INC. Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic SHORELINE DR POND -PARKING DECK $260.00 AREA TREATMENT #4- DUCKWEED, SUBMERGED WEEDS & ALGAE Invoice 166306 7/27/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $260.00 Refer 21 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply CITRUS PUMICE HAND CLEANER- PUB WKS $52.59 SHOP Invoice 9305119516 7/27/2017 Project 17-3 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.59 Refer 22 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR - -2263- Current Period: August 2017 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 5 Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 -COLOR $119.30 OVERAGE - 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-17 Invoice 2582831 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 2582831 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying Invoice 2580785 8/1/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - B & W $148.06 OVERAGE - 7-14-17 THRU 8-13-17 KONICA MINOLTA B200 PW COPIER $2.69 OVERAGE CHG 7-10-17 THRU 8-09-17 Project 17-3 FIRE DEPT COPIER B & W OVERAGE 4-1-17 $66.24 THRU 6-30-17 Invoice 2559313-2 7/25/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIRE DEPT COPIER B & W OVERAGE 4-1-17 -$66.24 THRU 6-30-17 CX Invoice 2559313-2 7/25/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $270.05 Refer 46 LUBE -TECH & PARTNERS, LLC Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply USED BULK OIL PICK UP- PUB WKS SHOP 8- $100.00 03-17 Invoice 991898 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply USED OIL FILTERS & OIL DRUM PICK UP- $55.00 PUB WKS SHOP 8-07-17 Invoice 993432 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $155.00 Refer 23 MEDIACOM Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 48-16-17 THRU 9- $95.90 15-17 Invoice 082217 8/6/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $95.90 Refer 47 MEDPAC BAGS, INC. Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies MEDPAC 2800 MEDICAL BAG- RED, & MED $311.98 PACK 300 -NAVY Invoice 3030551 8/3/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $311.98 Refer 24 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTE Cash Payment E 602-49450-388 Waste Disposal-MCIS WASTEWATER SVCS SEPTEMBER 2017 $60,651.73 Invoice 0001071281 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $60,651.73 Refer 26 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH Cash Payment E 602-49450-434 Conference & Training CREDIT- REFUND -WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM -$32.00 OPERATOR EXAM FEE M. LEMEN Invoice 082217 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-300 Professional Srvs REVERSE REVENUE POSTING ERROR- $32.00 JUNE 17 CODED AS MULTI STATE BACKGROUND CHECK REIMBURSEMENT - WAS REFUND FOR SEWER DEPT TRAINING Invoice 082217 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM OPERATOR $23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL- R. LARSON Invoice 082217 8/3/2017 -2264- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 6 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.00 Refer 53 MINNESOTA PIPE AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply DAKOTA CURB BOXES - 6 QTY $527.46 Invoice 0384162 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 22 AWG 3/C WIRE 500' SPOOL- WATER DEPT $73.95 Invoice 0384240 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $601.41 Refer 27 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTRO Cash Payment E 601-49400-433 Dues and Subscriptions WASTEWATER CERTIFICATION RENEWAL- $23.00 R. LARSON Invoice 082217 8/3/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $23.00 Refer 28 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSO Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training MRWA OPERATOR EQUIPMENT EXPO SEPT $125.00 6TH- WACONIA- REGISTRATION- M. TESSEN Invoice 082217 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training MRWA OPERATOR EQUIPMENT EXPO SEPT $125.00 6TH- WACONIA- REGISTRATION- R. PRICH Invoice 082217 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training MRWA OPERATOR EQUIPMENT EXPO SEPT $125.00 6TH- WACONIA- REGISTRATION- R. LARSON Invoice 082217 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $375.00 Refer 29 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples MONTHLY COLIFORM WATER TEST- 6 $51.00 TESTS Invoice 876996 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-470 Water Samples MONTHLY CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM $90.00 WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 876995 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/6/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $141.00 Refer 51 MINNETONKA CUSTOM HOMES Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow NEW CONSTRUCTION ESCROW REFUND- $5,000.00 5024 TUXEDO BLVD- BP #2016-00763- MINNETONKA CUSTOM HOMES Invoice 082217 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 30 MNSPECT Cash Payment E 101-42400-308 Building Inspection Fees JULY 2017 BUILDING INSPECTION FEES $16,782.88 Invoice 7103 8/8/2017 Cash Payment G 101-20800 Due to Other Governments JULY 2017 - ELECTRICAL STATE -$17.00 SURCHARGE FEE CREDIT Invoice 7103 8/8/2017 Cash Payment R 101-42000-32220 Electrical Permit Fee JULY 2017 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION -$205.00 PERMIT FEE CREDITS Invoice 7103 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,560.88 Refer 31 MTI DISTRIBUTING, INC. -2265- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 7 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply MOTION CONTROL $100.73 Invoice 1132094 7/28/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $100.73 Refer 32 MULCH STORE, THE Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material 50/50 CONTRACTORS BLEND- MULCH - 7-6- $16.00 17 Invoice 22040 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 22040 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 22040 7/31/2017 50/50 CONTRACTORS BLEND- MULCH - 7-10- 17 50/50 CONTRACTORS BLEND- MULCH - 7-25- 17 $32.00 $16.00 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $64.00 Refer 33 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAI Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic REPLACE LOWER SEAL ON PPUMP #2 @ $375.00 WOODLAND & DOVE LIFT STATION Invoice 8205 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $375.00 Refer 34 NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply RUBBER WHEEL CHOCK W/ EYE, $117.92 STRONGWAY B/P SPRAYER TOOL BAG - PUB WKS Invoice 4061073508 7/25/2017 Project 17-3 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $117.92 Refer 35 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies COPY PAPER, BANDAGES, RED PENS, $142.98 STAPLES, HIGHLIGHTER PENS Invoice 947958126001 7/31/2017 PO 24819 Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies Invoice 947958018001 7/31/2017 PO 24819 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 947952398001 7/31/2017 PO 23488 Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies Invoice 947958127001 7/31/2017 PO 24819 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 945470410001 7/24/2017 PO 23486 TRACING PAD $3.99 LAMINATING POUCHES, STAPLES- HWS $41.52 MANILLA FILE FOLDERS- LEGAL SIZE $19.99 COPY PAPER, CALCULATOR SPOOL, & $89.96 CALCULATOR PAPER ROLLS- HWS Transaction Date 811612017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $298,44 Refer 36 PEDERSON, GREG Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE MEALS- FIRE RESCUE INTL $177.00 2017- G. PEDERSON- CHARLOTTE NC- JULY 26-292017 Invoice 082217 8/11/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training Invoice 082217 8/11/2017 REIMBURSE MILEAGE & UBER- FIRE RESCUE INTL 2017- G. PEDERSON- CHARLOTTE NC- JULY 26-29 2017 50 •• $103.07 CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 8 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE AIRFARE- FIRE RESCUE INTL $444.90 2017- G. PEDERSON- CHARLOTTE NC- JULY 26-292017 Invoice 082217 8/11/2017 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training TRAVEL ADVANCE CK# 054143 - G. -$250.00 PEDERSON -FIRE RESCUE INTL 2017 - CHARLOTTE NC- JULY 26-29 2017 Invoice 082217 8/11/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $474.97 Refer 37 PRIDE CONSTRUCTION & EXCAVA Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic REPLACE & RELOCATE 3 CURB STOPS @ $1,880.00 NORTHERN RD & BAYRIDGE RD Invoice 082217 5/8/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic DIG UP & BACKFULL SEWER LINES @ $750.00 NORTHERN RD & BAYRIDGE RD Invoice 082217 5/8/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic REPLACE & REPAIR CURB STOPS - DOVE $2,700.00 LN & AVOCET LN Invoice 082217 5/22/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2016 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,330.00 Refer 38 R. C. ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC AIR CONDITIONER @ CENTENNIAL $859.68 BLDG- ADD 1 100 AMP DISCONNECT & 3 250 V FUSES Invoice 5767 7/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $859.68 Refer 39 SWEEPER SERVICES Cash Payment E 101-43100-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPAIR CONVEYOR ASSEMBLY ON $5,468.55 SWEEPER- REPLACE UPPER & LOWER ROLLERS, BEARINGS & BELT, CLEAN & WELD FRAME, ADJUST CHAINS Invoice 17159 7/28/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,468.55 Refer 41 UHL COMPANY Cash Payment E 101-41910-400 Repairs & Maintenance SVC HVAC SYSTEM @ CENTENNIAL BLDG- $517.00 ZONE 1 LEVEL 4 HOT- REPLACE ACTUATOR Invoice 53170 7/31/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $517.00 Refer 40 UL1NE Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies ANTIBACTERIAL FOAMING SOAP- PUB WKS $85.99 SHOP Invoice 89072192 7/28/2017 Project 17-3 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $85.99 Refer 42 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply 100 LB RAMP ASSIST SPRING LEFT FOR $45.06 PARKS TRAILER Invoice 855204 8/10/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $45.06 Refer 52 USA BLUEBOOK -2267- Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 330915 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 08/17/17 11:14 AM Page 9 PARA 20# BLOCKS DEODORANT- 4 $702.23 CHERRY, 4 PINE- SEWER DEPT WATER CHEMICALS- REAGENT REGILL 250 $150.50 WATER TESTS, SAMPLE HACH- PK OF 100, CHLORINE REAGENT DISPENSER 250 TESTS Invoice 328518 8/1/2017 Project 330915 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $852.73 Refer 43 WACONIA FORD MERCURY Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 88465 7/20/2017 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 88536 7/28/2017 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply SEWER TRUCK #109- PARTS - SEAL ETC. $123.02 SEWER TRUCK #109- ANTI -FREEZE $111.72 WATER TRUCK WHEEL ALIGNMENT, NEW $259.84 BATTERY '09 FORD TRUCK Invoice 113916 7/28/2017 Transaction Date 8/16/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $494.58 Refer 54 XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 556728838 8/4/2017 Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 555582438CX 7/27/2017 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 555582438-2 7/27/2017 ELECTRIC SVC 7-03-17 THRU 8-02-17 CITY $1,310.03 OWNED STREET LIGHTS CX POSTING- UPGRADE TO LED STREET -$13,246.99 LIGHTS- CHANGEOVER BUILT IN TO MONTHLY USAGE BILLINGS ELECTRIC SVC 4-05-17 (05-02-17) THRU 7-27- $13,246.99 17 MAYWOOD STREET LIGHTS- 3+ MO SVC - CHANGEOVER TO LED LIGHTS Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,310.03 Fund Summary Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $150,197.52 Total $150,197.52 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $71,871.93 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $4,025.66 355 2003-C G.O. TIF 1-2 $500.00 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $60.78 601 WATER FUND $10,174.87 602 SEWER FUND $62,847.04 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $457.24 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $260.00 $150,197.52 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $150,197.52 Total $150,197.52 CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Batch Name 082217HWS User Dollar Amt $109,822.19 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $109,822.19 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 AM CRAFT SPIRITS, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 8091 8/1/2017 $269.16 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $269.16 Refer 2 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $174.27 Invoice 1990721704 8/5/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $186.08 Invoice 199072206 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Due 12/31/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $360.35 Refer 3 ARCTIC GLACIER PREMIUM ICE Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $161.87 Invoice 1911722409 8/12/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $192.25 Invoice 1937721307 8/1/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $110.76 Invoice 1911722706 8/15/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Due 12/31/2014 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $464.88 Refer 4 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $168.85 Invoice 3197722 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $549.95 Invoice 3199445 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $28.70 Invoice 3187770-2 6/22/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$8.52 Invoice 393575 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $738.98 Refer 6 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $22.55 Invoice 96216100 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $17.00 Invoice 96216100 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R PICKLED GREEN BEANS- ORIGINAL INVOICE $29.70 Invoice 96135900-2 7/14/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $69.25 Refer 7 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,032.50 Invoice 60072600 8/4/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $23.25 Invoice 60072600 8/4/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$283.00 Invoice 59983400 7/28/2017 CITY Y ®F MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,879.80 Invoice 59992200 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $88.00 Invoice 59992300 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $166.00 Invoice 60134800 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $362.45 Invoice 60109900 8/9/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,496.25 Refer 5 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $74.60 Invoice 96253500 8/7/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $30.00 Invoice 96253500 8/7/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- CHAMPAGNE STOPPER, GIFT BAGS, $30.84 SHOT GLASS Invoice 96253500 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $135.44 Pn� Refer 9 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,136.10 Invoice 60102000 8/7/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $955.00 Invoice 60102500 8/7/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,576.92 Invoice 60217600 8/14/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$317.50 Invoice 60198100 8/10/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,350.52 Refer 10 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $150.00 Invoice 373412 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,082.35 Invoice 373413 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $916.80 Invoice 374792 8/9/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,149.15 Refer 43 BLU SKY PUBLISHING Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 1/4 PAGE AD SEPT 2017 BALANCE MN $180.00 MAGAZINE Invoice 17207 8/15/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.00 Refer 11 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,694.98 Invoice 1090745912 8/9/2017 -2270- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,698.75 Refer 12 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE Invoice 1965375 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $646.65 Invoice 1080670192 8/3/2017 BEER $72.70 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,818.30 Invoice 1080670702 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $89.63 Invoice 1080670703 8/3/2017 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,554.58 Refer 13 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE $172.80 Invoice 1970626 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $881.40 Invoice 1080673541 8/9/2017 E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,665.72 Invoice 1080674312 8/10/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,547.12 Refer 14 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,398.55 Invoice 1965375 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $72.70 Invoice 1965376 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale CREDIT -$194.90 Invoice 355-188 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $172.80 Invoice 1970626 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $9,017.55 Invoice 1960113 8/1/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,865.10 Invoice 1970333 8/15/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,331.80 Refer 15 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO. Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $404.60 Invoice 67-2313 8/10/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $404.60 Refer 16 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $356.69 Invoice 3601204229 8/1/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $157.48 Invoice 3601204364 8/15/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $514.17 Refer 17 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 4 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,379.50 Invoice 1237517 8/8/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,280.00 Invoice 1294569 8/1/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,659.50 Refer 42 HALO BRANDED SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising HWS LOGO 5 OZ BEER MUGS FOR SOTL $792.20 MEET YOUR MAKER TASTING EVENT 7-21- 17 QTY 425 Invoice 3105506 7/13/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $792.20 Refer 18 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,657.25 Invoice 910037 8/3/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,657.25 Refer 44 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $83.00 Invoice 2723699 8/16/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $15.49 Invoice 2723699 8/16/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,447.15 Invoice 2723698 8/16/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,447A5 Invoice 2685363 8/16/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,992,79 Refer 19 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $82.30 Invoice 2723634 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $38.80 Invoice 2723634 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,058.65 Invoice 2723633 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,746.07 Invoice 2723663 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $98.40 Invoice 2723664 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $77.60 Invoice 2723664 8/9/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,101.82 Refer 46 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous COLD PLATE - CUSTOMER CHECK OUT - $300.00 DEPOSIT Invoice 2685363 8/11/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-430 Miscellaneous COLD PLATE - CUSTOMER RETURN- CREDIT -$300.00 Invoice 2695893 8/15/2017 Transaction Date 8/17/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $0.00 Refer 20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR -2272- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 5 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $24.00 Invoice 5788609 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,451.93 Invoice 5788607 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,456.00 Invoice 5788608 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $30.00 Invoice 5794009 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,897.22 Invoice 5794007 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,936.02 Invoice 5794008 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$291.00 Invoice 636555 7/27/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$30.00 Invoice 714140 6/9/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,474.17 Refer 21 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $162.00 Invoice 2157 8/8/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $162.00 Refer 22 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7-17-17 $37.70 Invoice 32618 7/17/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7-20-17 $201.55 Invoice 33258 7/20/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7-27-17 $292.90 Invoice 33276 7/27/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 7-31-17 $47.85 Invoice 33284 7/31/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $580.00 Refer 24 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERA Cash Payment E609-49750-433 Dues and Subscriptions JULY 2017 TO JULY 2018 MN MUNICIPAL $1,700.00 BEVERAGE ASSOC ANNUAL DUES- HWS Invoice 082217 7/31/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,700.00 Refer 23 MINNESTALGIA WINERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $180.00 Invoice 4784 7/31/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $180.00 Refer 25 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals SEPT 2017 COMMON AREA MTCE & $685.78 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 082217 9/1/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals AUG 2017- BAL DUE COMMON AREA MTCE $6.55 & INSURANCE HWS Invoice 082217 8/1/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Faraa 10100 Total $692.33 -2273- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 6 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Refer 45 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $501.00 Invoice 8500117 8/14/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $7.00 Invoice 8500117 8/14/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $508.00 Refer 26 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $345.00 Invoice 8598460 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8,75 Invoice 8598460 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $688.13 Invoice 8599297 8/7/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $7.00 Invoice 8599297 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,048.88 Refer 27 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $637.50 Invoice 2211791 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $472.20 Invoice 2211790 8/9/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,109.70 Refer 28 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,173.80 Invoice 2208109 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,191.75 Invoice 2208110 8/2/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $42.50 Invoice 2208111 8/2/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,408.05 Refer 29 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic CONTRACTED PEST CONTROL SVC 8-02-17 $52.02 HWS Invoice 16036544 8/2/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.02 Refer 30 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION CO. INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $144.00 Invoice 13543-1428 7/31/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX CREDIT -$83.71 Invoice 13543-1115 7/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $157.00 Invoice 13543-1663 8/14/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $217.29 Refer 31 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 8-31-17 $15.00 EDITION Invoice S0592755 7/18/2017 CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 7 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 Refer 35 SIMPLE GRACE PROMOTIONS, IN Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising BEER BOTTLE MAGNETIC BOTTLE OPENER- $697.36 HWS LOGO IMPRINTED -500 QTY Invoice 1375 8/3/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $697.36 Refer 33 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,116.00 Invoice 1577222 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $4,573.05 Invoice 1577220 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $54.00 Invoice 1577221 8/10/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,743.05 Refer 32 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,122.02 Invoice 1574605 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,832.73 Invoice 1574606 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $81.00 Invoice 1574607 8/3/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,035.75 Refer 34 TWISTED SHRUB, LLC, THE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $324.00 Invoice 1732 8/7/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $324.00 Refer 37 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $216.50 Invoice 0185801 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0185801 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $80.00 Invoice 0185800 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0185800 8/3/2017 Transaction Date 8/1512017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $306.50 Refer 36 VINOCOP/A, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $369.00 Invoice 0186253 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $6.00 Invoice 0186253 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $432.00 Invoice 0186252 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $10.00 Invoice 0186252 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $120.00 Invoice 0186312 8/10/2017 -2275- CITY OF MOUND 08/17/17 11:15 AM Page 8 Payments Current Period: August 2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $168.00 Invoice 45037 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 45037 8/10/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $489.33 Invoice 44368 8/3/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.25 Invoice 44368 8/3/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $670.58 Refer 39 WINE MERCHANTS Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $408.00 Invoice 7144541 8/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$30.00 Invoice 714140 6/9/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $19.75 Invoice 7144542 8/9/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $397.75 Refer 40 WRS IMPORTS, LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $156.00 Invoice 1400 7/31/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $156.00 Refer 41 Z WINES USA LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $160.00 Invoice 18330 8110/2017 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 18330 8/10/2017 Transaction Date 8/15/2017 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $165.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $109,822.19 $109,822.19 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $109,822.19 Total $109,822.19 MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 8, 2017 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in regular session on Tuesday, August 8, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Ray Salazar, Kelli Gillispie, and Jennifer Peterson Members absent: Council Member Jeff Bergquist Others present: City Manager and Director of Public Works Eric Hoversten, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Administrative Assistant Mary Mackres, Nicole Brodzik, Adam Roal, and Troy Koopman Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda City Manager Eric Hoversten requested addition of page 2220a to Item 4J, which is updated survey information for expansion permit showing actual proposed garage dimensions which are wider but still conforming to all setback requirements relative to the garage. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent agenda MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $667,317.17 B. Approve Minutes: 7/25/17 Regular Meeting C. Approve a 1-4 Day Temporary On -Sale Liquor License for Northwest Tonka Lions September 30, 2017 Westonka School District Lacrosse Fundraiser event at the Gillespie Center D. RESOLUTION NO. 17-109: RESOLUTION TO FORMALLY ACCEPT A CENTERPOINT ENERGY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,500 TO PARTIALLY FUND AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS, REPLACEMENT ADULT AND PEDIATRIC DEFIBRILLATION ELECTRODE PADS, AND TRAFFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT -2277- Mound City Council Minutes —August 8, 2017 E. Approve Pay Request No. 4 from Park Construction in the amount of $260,233.31 for the 2017 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project; City Project Nos. PW - 17 -01, PW -17-02, PW -17-03, PW -17-04 F. Approve Pay Request No. 8 from Ryan Contracting in the amount of $194,771.65 for the 2016 Street, Utility and Retaining Wall Improvement Project; City Project Nos. PW -16- 01, PW -16-02, PW -16-03, PW -16-04 G. Approve the following project related pay requests: 1. Norling Lake Minnetonka Landscapes, Inc. totaling $5,786.50 for the 2016 Street Improvement Project, Bartlett Blvd., City Project No. PW -16-01 2. Braun Intertec, totaling $5,557.54 for the 2017 Street Improvement Project, Wilshire Blvd., and Tuxedo Blvd., City Project Nos. PW -17-02, PW -17-03 H. RESOLUTION NO. 17-110: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE CARLSON PARK DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (PW -16-09) I. RESOLUTION NO. 17-111: RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC GATHERING PERMIT, SEASONAL AND PORTABLE SIGN PERMIT AND 1-4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR 2017 OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CATHOLIC CHURCH INCREDIBLE FESTIVAL ON SEPTEMBER 22-24,2017, WITH WAIVED MUSICAL CONCERT FEE Of' M-1:1MY-113 9 0146 1111:1911,114. -!RU • 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None offered 6. Public Hearing Review and consideration of proposed amendment to Mound City Code Section 129-196 (b) related to the swimming pool regulations to allow use of an automatic pool cover as an alternate to a fence Applicant: Troy Koopman, 1732 Canary Lane Sarah Smith presented request by resident, Troy Koopman, to consider an amendment to the City's zoning ordinance regarding the swimming pool ordinance. Current regulations require a fence of no less than 5 ft and no more than 6 ft. Current application is a request to change the zoning ordinance, allowing the use of an automatic pool cover in lieu of a fence enclosure. Included in the information tonight is the background material that was prepared previously and the research that has been done. Smith noted this is a policy decision. Smith said the Planning Commission reviewed this back in 2014 and recommended amending the zoning ordinance, but a split vote of the Council opted not to undertake the amendment at that time. Smith said the resident requested reconsideration and has offered language that is similar to ordinances other communities have adopted. Smith said the City review is similar to what was done in 2014 and noted the standards for pool covers have not changed. Smith noted that neither the Fire Chief nor the Building Official had any concerns with the proposal. The Building Official sees this as a reasonable Mound City Council Minutes —August 8, 2017 alternative to a fence. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval as did Staff. At the Planning Commission meeting, an industry representative from Performance Pools commented on the industry standards. Smith said a public hearing is needed and was noticed in the Laker. Smith noted there was a recent rule change August 1 which requires notification of an ordinance amendment a minimum of 10 days prior by electronic means, As the City was already underway with their review, the electronic notification was sent on August 1 via CodeRED and the website when the rule went into effect. Mayor Wegscheid opens the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Troy Koopman, 1732 Canary, said he is going to get a cover anyway and noted that a lot of the communities around Mound have implemented this policy. Koopman said that those communities that have changed to allow the pool covers in lieu of fences have not gone back to the previous way. Koopman said a cover is safer than a fence. Gillispie asked about the weight limit on covers. Koopman said that 485 pounds is the industry standard. Koopman doesn't know what the longevity would be, but noted this cover can be locked. Mayor Wegscheid closes the public hearing at 7:11 p.. Mayor Wegscheid said that he relies on the recommendations of the Building Inspector, Fire Chief, Staff, and the Planning Commission review. Wegscheid says that there are just as many variables with a pool cover as there are with a fence. A pool cover can be locked in the owner's absence. Wegscheid thinks it is acceptable and comments that this is not new technology and doesn't put Mound on the cutting edge, sticking it's neck out on something that's never been done before. Salazar commented that Mound is a lake community, with no fence around the lake. Anyone can walk into the lake at any time. Salazar says he is familiar with these covers, which could hold a baby elephant and not rip or tear. Salazar likes the pool covers. Covers keep a pool clean and safe as well as providing insular properties. Salazar has no problem with the cover. Peterson commented that the Planning Commission had no concerns. Gillispie says that everything has been pretty much covered in the discussion and feels this is a reasonable request. Requested Actions A. Approve Ordinance No. 05-2017 amending Mound City Code Chapter 129 (Zoning Ordinance) as it relates to the swimming pool requirements MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve ordinance. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mound City Council Minutes —August 8, 2017 B. Approve Resolution to allow for publication of Ordinance No. 05-2017 by title and summary (requires 4/5s vote of City Council to approve) MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Gillispie, to approve resolution. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 91V Lel:94VAd ) 3 7. Action on a resolution approving Public Gathering Permit and Musical Concert Permit for Running of the Bays half marathon and 5k run to be held on Saturday, September 9, 2017. Mayor Mark Wegscheid recused himself and acting mayor Kelli Gillispie took over the meeting. Sarah Smith, presented applications submitted by Mark Wegscheid for the Running of the Bays race noting this is an annual event which has taken place for several years. Smith said two actions are requested by the Council, approval of a public gathering permit and a musical concert permit. Smith said applications came in and were routed for review, all involved agencies have been contacted by the applicant who also provided route information. Smith said Staff recommends approval of both permits. MOTION by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve the following resolution. Salazar, Peterson, and Gillispie voted in favor. No one voted against. Motion carried. Mayor Wegscheid rejoined the Council at the dais. 8. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council Members Hoversten reminded all of the following events: Aug. 12 - Dog Days Westonka which takes place in the Harbor District. This is a great activity for dogs and dog lovers. Hoversten says there will be a lot of media coverage involved, bringing a spotlight on the community. Sept. 9 - Running of The Bays Sept. 16 - Mound residents can participate in a tree sale supported by grant dollars from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Cargill, and the Tree Trust. Residents can purchase two 6-8 foot trees with a 5 gallon root ball for $30 each, with an actual value of approximately $100. Order via link on Mound's City website through September 10th and pick up Saturday, Sept. 16 at the Public Works garage. This is a great deal for residents. Mound City Council Minutes —August 8, 2017 B. Reports: C. Minutes: D. Correspondence: 9. Adiourn MOTION by Gillispie, seconded by Salazar, to adjourn at 7:21 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Mark Wegscheid Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk • • f I •R1,11 9 Is]MME RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 2017 CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (CBD) PARKING MAINTENANCE ROLL TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR AT 5% INTEREST LEVY #19677 WHEREAS, participants signed a CBD Parking Program Agreement in 2010 that allows for the collection of the CBD Parking Maintenance Fee by means of the assessment process; and WHEREAS, the owner of 2250 Commerce Boulevard signed a Shared Parking Agreement in 2000 and a Land Agreement in 2006 that allows for the collection of maintenance fees by means of the assessment process; and WHEREAS, by entering into these agreements the participants have waived their right to an assessment hearing for said assessment: 2017 CBD PARKING MAINTENANCE FROM JULY 1, 2016 TO JUNE 30, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound: 1. Such proposed special assessments as noted below, and made a part hereof, are hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named herein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessments shall be payable in one annual installment as follows: PID Number Amount 14-117-24-44-0042 $856.31 14-117-24-44-0001 $782.08 14-117-24-44-0004 $751.43 13-117-24-33-0158 $2,885.12 3. Such assessment shall be payable in one installment and shall bear interest at the rate of five (5) percent, to be collectable in 2018. To the assessment shall be added interest from November 15, 2017 through December 31, 2018. 4. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Mound, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid by November 15, 2017. 5. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August, 2017. Mayor Mark Wegscheid Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD - MOUND, MN 55364-1668 - PH: 952-472-0600 - FAX: 952-472-0620 - WWW.CITYOFMOUND.COM August 11, 2017 Ray Mar Properties, Inc. Attn: Bruce Dodds 2250 Commerce Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 Re: 2016-2017 parking repair and maintenance charges This letter is in regard to the 2016-2017 parking maintenance charge for Raymar Properties, Inc. (RayMar) related to fees incurred by the City for parking maintenance at 2250 Commerce Boulevard and the North Parking Lot as provided by the 2000 Shared Parking Agreement and 2006 Land Agreement. Please see breakdown below: Building Square Footage (as provided by Hennepin County) —17,162 square feet 1 stall per 400 SF calculation (as used in the CBD Program) — 43 stalls required (less) 20 spaces provided for RayMar in parking ramp (per Agreements) 9 spaces provided on RayMar property Net: 14 parking stall shortage Therefore, RayMar is responsible for (9+14) = 23 of the 25 (92%) of the total spaces in the North Parking Lot. Applying that to the cost formula developed by the City, $2,885.12 is owed by RayMar for the period of 7/1/16 to 6/30/17. As you may recall, an approximate estimate of $2,000 to cover maintenance and repair of the North Parking Lot was included in the Land Agreement between the Mound HRA and RayMar. The amount owed is part of this year's special assessment roll which will be included on the Tuesday, August 22, 2017 City Council meeting agenda for action. Please pay this amount in full by November 15, 2017 to avoid interest. After that time, it will be certified to the County Auditor with an interest rate of 5 percent. If you have any questions regarding any of this information, please feel free to contact me via phone at 952.472.0633 or by email at catherinepausche@cityofmound.com. Sincerely, Catherine Pausche Director of Finance and Administrative Services -2283- Public Works - Parking Maintenance North Lot of Transit District - 7/1/16 - 6/30/17 Cost of Hrs per Labor/ event Overhead Materials Total Cost Total Cost Plowing & Salting (Beniek) 1 $ - $ - $ 3,136.00 Signing - (sign, pole, cap) - Charged individually to owner 0 $ $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ Sweeping 0 $ $ - $ - $ Total Cost to Allocate as of 6/30/17 $ 3,136.00 Raymar percentage (23 of the 25 spaces in the North Lot) 92% $ 2,885.12 % Share based on the following: Raymar building footprint SF provided by Hennepin County: Spaces required: Business and professional offices —1 space per 400 SF (used to be consistent with Langdon District) 17,162 / 400 = 43 Spaces Total Spaces Required: 43 LESS: Deck I Spaces (no charge) (20) North Lot spaces owned by Ray Mar (9) Additional Spaces Needed from Public 14 North Lot Total Spaces 25 North Lot Spaces owned/need by Ray Mar Properties, Inc (9 + 14) 23 % of Maintenance Allocation to Ray Mar Properties, Inc. 0.92 CI --� 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD • MOUND, MN 55364-1668 ® PH: 952-472-0600 ° FAX: 952-472-0620. WWW.CITYOFMOUND.COM DATE: AUGUST 11, 2017 FROM: ., DIRECTOR OF ' ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Enclosed is the proposed assessment roll for the period July 1, 2016- June 30, 2017. Under the Langdon District CBD parking agreement approved in 2010, the City will no longer include these assessments in the public hearing before the City Council. The assessment resolution will appear on the August 22, 2017 Consent Agenda. The City contracted with Beniek Property Services to plow the Langdon Area. Recent history includes: Assessment Total Cost Net $ Received Difference Year from Participants Paid by City 2017 3,444 544 2,900 2016 3,358 458 2,900 2015 3,584 684 21900 2014 7,755 4,855 2,900 2013 5,765 2,865 2,900 2012 2,279 729 1,550 2011 51775 4,225 1,550 You may pay the balance due by November 15, 2017, otherwise the City will certify the amount due to the County for inclusion on the property's payable 2018 property tax bill. Continued on next page => -2285- Central Business District - Langdon Contract Page 2 The City has been asked what we are going to do about the condition of the parking lot throughout the district. CBD participants are reminded of the City's obligations per the shared parking agreement, which are reiterated below and are limited to maintenance: 2. City Obligation. During the term of this Agreement the City will provide certain maintenance activities on the parking area described on Exhibit C. The maintenance activities are limited to the following all to be performed at intervals in the absolute discretion of the City: snow removal; sweeping; signage, striping, pothole filling and other minor surface repairs. With respect to the parking spaces shown in Exhibit C, the City will also be responsible for providing maintenance activities on areas owned by either the Owners or the City serving as access to parking. The City is more than willing to participate in a discussion on the future of the district and the parking conditions as a property owner of the rights of way. Staff will schedule a meeting in September with all the owners. Please send me the email and phone information for the person who will represent your property at this meeting. If you have any questions about this assessment, please contact me at 952-472-0633 or via email at catherinepausche@cityofmound.com. bYIi� 0 N O -2287- c z r n ro T0 ° �D OO OM. C D a 0 d m a oT o O 0o v a) m 0 O/ D) d m 3 (O O '9 J �p N m O � ;o 9 o00 <m YN O th co 00 0o w N V D 00V Ito< N A O A 01 O A A 0! 3 g-a ' Q o oo rn o H o � w D -n nAi w o Ul A co w r N o m x n CDm oCA m ni m v " o N A 0 N W a 000 A D Z _ 1D < a ° a m � O R (Jr A /0 Lh tD N N a fl. N 40 to O O O O O O O O 0 0 00 0 0 n a N ? N N Os N !O N R @ O) O O O O O N N O f0 O N Ct d O O O O O O O O a m a N O O O O O O O O O a° _ a o o O) V N V -� V OD N O a O) C W Ato 0 Ch W co N OOi N .3. a)o V coo w CD co - m A A A A R A A V V V V V J V J V A A�aa A A A �A�aa ppA A A A A ? A A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w N Z w X w K N w w N"W w w � tAlf fD LD. w 0 0 0 n 0 w ° 3 3 3 3 w m m m coo m ro a m o N 3 ° ° v m M = m m rm � O z Ory m g D3 _ D a x p N v G) m Z —Z z v ca C) v 3 0 z a Ln r T o y r m n y r d 0 m' (D 3 m c z r n ro T0 ° �D OO OM. C D a 0 d m a oT o O 0o v a) m 0 O/ D) d m 3 (O O '9 J �p N m O � ;o 9 o00 <m YN O th co 00 0o w N V D 00V Ito< N A O A 01 O A A 0! 3 g-a ' Q o oo rn o H o � w D -n nAi w o Ul A co w r N o m x n CDm oCA m ni m v " o N A 0 N W a 000 A D Z _ 1D < a ° a m � O R (Jr A /0 Lh tD N N a fl. N 40 to O O O O O O O O 0 0 00 0 0 n a N ? N N Os N !O N R @ O) O O O O O N N O f0 O N Ct d O O O O O O O O a m a N O O O O O O O O O a° _ a o o O) V N V -� V OD N O a O) C W Ato 0 Ch W co N OOi N .3. a)o V coo w CD co - m -'� Cl) ° n UJ CC U) Im � ni =, Sv CD n CDDro 72. cQ Q- , n O t� to Q' CD cQ N O S. to a-,, -•. m ,-. o '< cn < o c 0 I SD 0 -1 nv v CD � O ... O N � W O CD = is < us d CD CD O O O O M O ffl 4t3 Edi {� Efl ff3 W P NCS 2) O 2) ` O O O fl. Ffl <A ffl f9 -(A .69 Sll O O Efl Efl {f3 ffl to �69 0 O W n p O O O CD G Z CD O CD c O O O O O O -' m fA <A -69 64 to Efl 4fl W W W O O Cl) a O O '"• Catherine Pausche From: Ken Potts [pottskatty@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 2:52 PM To: Catherine Pausche Subject: City of Mound - Corrected Resolution Attachments: Mound Resolution-corrected.docx Attn: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk After receiving and sending in your signed resolution and agreements we received an email from the BCA indicating that there was an error in the resolution (the JPA and Data Services Agreements were fine). The error originated with the original resolution forwarded by the BCA for the city's approval. It was meant to be between the City and Prosecuting Attorney only, not the police department. I am forwarding here their revised resolution. Please introduce this resolution at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Mound city council. Thank you and I apologize for any confusion/inconvenience this has caused. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call. Kenneth N. Potts Potts kattvC@aol.corn This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the individual or organization to which they are addressed. They may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be disseminated. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon this e-mail or the attachments. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. Thank you. -----Original Message ----- From: Ken Potts <pottskattygaol.com> To: catherinepausche <cat heri ne pa usche(o)cityofmou nd. com > Sent: Thu, Jul 13, 2017 4:12 pm Subject: Mound New Joint Powers of Agreement, Court Services Amendment and Resolution Attn: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk The Joint Powers of Agreement and Court Data Services Agreement will be expiring soon. Attached is a resolution and renewals of the agreements forwarded to us by the BCA (Bureau of Criminal Apprehension). Please have them presented at the next meeting of the city council for approval and signature. I will need the Resolution and just the signature pages from the JPA and Court Data Services Agreements returned to me, either scanned or electronically signed. If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call or you are free to contact Karen Roatch at the BCA directly. Her phone number is 651-793-2734. Thank you. -2289- I WHEREAS, the City of Mound approved Resolution No. 17-104 on July 25, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney and Pehee Depai4mei4 desires to enter into Joint Powers Agreements with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension to use systems and tools available over the State's criminal justice data communications network for which the City is eligible; and WHEREAS, the Joint Powers Agreements further provide the City with the ability to add, modify and delete connectivity, systems and tools over the five year life of the agreement and obligates the City to pay the costs for the network connection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements by and between the State of Minnesota acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and the City of Mound on behalf of its Prosecuting Attorney are hereby approved. 2. That the City Prosecutor, Kenneth N. Potts, or his or her successor, is designated the Authorized Representative for the Prosecuting Attorney. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to maintain the City's connection to the systems and tools offered by the State. 3. That Mark Wegscheid, the Mayor for the City of Mound, and Eric Hoversten, the City Manager, are authorized to sign the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August, 2017. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk * Mark Wegscheid, Mayor CITY OF MOUND — PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 TO: City Council FROM: Eric Hoversten, City Manager and Director of Public Works DATE: August 11, 2017 SUBJECT: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Management Plan Review Comments LOCATION: Full Plan available for review on Watershed website, executive summary provided here. REQUEST: Council approve a Resolution Responding to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Management Plan Open Comment Period. CITY STAFF REVIEW The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has finalized the draft of its 2017 Management Plan to outline its philosophies, goals, and objectives for the next 10 years. The update process included a number of work group sessions including various partner -community policy -makers, administrators, and planners at government and local Watershed and Lake Association levels which City Staff Participated in. In addition, the District Staff relied heavily upon its Citizen, Technical, Policy Advisory, and Sub -Watershed Committees; and its Board of Managers to complete this update. These collaborative efforts resulted in the draft plan submitted for our review and comment, with responses requested NLT 5 Sep 2017. Staff has reviewed the plan and provides the following summary highlights: 1. The plan focuses on shifting the philosophy of the District from one of regulation and enforcement to developing partnerships with other government units, developers, outside resourcing groups, and citizens to implement the objectives of the Balanced Urban Ecology (BUE) framework established in 2014 and highlighted below. The MCWD realized that if it builds sound relationships with local partners; remains aware of partners' land use activities and goals; is mindful of sub -watershed priorities; and is watchful and flexible, opportunities will present themselves to advance water resource goals cost-effectively and consistent with other local public and private goals. This Plan takes the next step in the evolution of the MCWD's philosophy and approach by adopting the Balanced Urban Ecology policy as its underlying organizational strategy. 2. The plan - through the Balanced Urban Ecology Framework - recognizes and emphasizes balance between economic, social, recreational, and community equities across the watershed The natural environment is an integral component of vibrant communities. It creates a sense ofplace, provides vital connections, and enhances social and economic value. The MCWD vision is a landscape of vibrant communities where the natural and built environments in balance create value and enjoyment. This vision stems from the MCWD's 2014 adoption of the Balanced Urban Ecology policy, which now serves as the MCWD's underlying organizational strategy. It prioritizes partnership with the land use community to integrate policy, planning and implementation. The Balanced Urban Ecology policy developed from a series of policy analyses that identified the governance gap between land use and water resource planning. It responded to state, county, and non-profit assessments calling for increased integration of water resource planning and land use planning to improve the watershed management model in Minnesota and for treating land development and water resource protection as complementary rather than competing interests. 3. The plan continues to acknowledge the science and chemistry of clean water and impact of Total Maximum Daily Loading (TMDL), contaminants of interest, point -source contributors, and best management practice to inform and influence basic water quality policy and standards, partnership opportunities, and investment priorities across the watershed system. The District has established four strategic goals to focus and guide its work: » Water Quantity - To manage the volume and flow of stormwater runoff to minimize the impacts of land use change on surface and groundwater. Water Quality - To preserve and improve the quality of surface and groundwater. » Ecological Integrity - To restore, maintain, and improve the health of ecological systems. » Thriving Communities - To promote and enhance the value of water resources in creating successful, sustainable communities. 4. The plan highlights continued value -based activities consistent with the BUE framework across the watershed; but highlights three specific objective areas where focused partnership, engagement, investment, and best management practice can generate the greatest impact upon existing water impairments... Minnehaha Creek As described in Section 1.2.3, the District's focused approach originated in the Minnehaha Creek Greenway and has produced significant natural resource and community benefits. The Board identified this section of the Creek through Hopkins and St. Louis Park as a priority focus area because of its resource needs — Minnehaha Creek and downstream Lake Hiawatha are impaired and this -2292- stretch of creek was identified as contributing the highest pollutant loads; and its opportunities — the area is undergoing significant land use planning and redevelopment due to the planned light rail transit system. Six Mile Halsted Bay The Six Mile -Halsted Bay focal geography is a complex system that spans four communities, two counties, and a significant portion of Three Rivers Park District land. It is resource -rich with 17 lakes Halsted Bay of Lake Minnetonka, and over 6, 000 acres of wetlands. Six of these lakes are classified as impaired under Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards with Halsted Bay requiring the largest load reduction of any waterbody in the District. The sub -watershed is experiencing significant growth and development activity that creates opportunities, and an urgency, for integrated land use and water resource planning. Painter Creek The Painter Creek Sub -watershed contains a number of large wetlands, many of which have been ditched or otherwise altered, that are connected by Painter Creek. The system delivers high phosphorus loads to Jennings Bay on Lake Minnetonka, which is listed as impaired and requires the second largest load reduction in the District. Painter Creek is also impaired by excess E. coli bacteria. The subwatershed includes areas of high quality wetland and upland, including several regionally significant ecological areas ... of these, the last two; Six-Mile/Halsted and Painter Creak will be of particular interest and value to the residents and community of Mound. Although neither of these focus areas fall within Mound corporate boundaries; their objectives to stabilize and improve the water quality in Halstead and Jennings Bays will be a clear benefit to our residents who use these waters. The Plan is in all regards consistent with concepts under development in the update of the Mound Comprehensive Plan. Protecting and improving the Lake, water, and other natural assets under our care will remain the foundation of our City efforts to emphasize and optimize the value of the amazing natural resource assets the Lakes are throughout our Community under the guidance of our updated plan. RECOMMENDATION The City Council for the City of Mound approve the Resolution Responding to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Management Plan Open Comment Period. -2293- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 17 - RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FROM THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (District) has drafted an update to its Watershed Management Plan (WMP) which was distributed for public review and comment on July 7, 2017; and WHEREAS, the draft WMP centers around the District's Balanced Urban Ecology policy which prioritizes partnership with the land use community to integrate policy, planning, and implementation in order to leverage the environmental, social, and economic value created when built and natural systems are in harmony; and WHEREAS, the draft WMP creates a framework in support of this policy which emphasizes: • Partnership and early coordination with cities and other public and private partners acting on the landscape to align goals, plans, and investments; • Focused implementation in areas of high resource need and opportunity so as to make significant, measurable improvement to water resources; and • Flexibility to respond to needs and opportunities District -wide through capital improvements, grants, technical support, and other programming; WHEREAS, the draft WMP has been developed in coordination with a Policy Advisory Committee, Technical Advisory Committee, and Citizens Advisory Committee which met regularly throughout 2015-2016 to provide input on the proposed WMP framework; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound (City) has participated in the development of the draft WMP through its Technical Advisory Committee and subwatershed meetings; WHEREAS, the City and District have a strong history of partnership integrating planning and implementation for built -natural systems; WHEREAS, the draft WMP includes several projects aimed at improving water quality in Halsted Bay, Jennings Bay, and greater Lake Minnetonka by addressing the upstream phosphorus loading in the Six Mile Creek and Painters Creek subwatersheds; and WHEREAS, the quality of Halsted Bay and Jennings Bay are extremely important to the City's residents who use the Bay or live along its shores; WHEREAS, the draft WMP includes an Opportunity Grant program to provide financial support for partner -led water resource improvement projects; and -2294- WHEREAS, the City has utilized the District's cost -share grants to implement multiple stormwater management and shoreline improvement projects over the years and values the continuation of such cost -share incentives; NNI LOLTM 9 W 1;4 aztlel;l 46 -.1 • The City of Mound expresses support for the District's draft WMP and its approach of partnership and integrated planning, focused implementation, and responsiveness to opportunities; and • The City will work to coordinate its policies, plans, and investments with the District to maximize public benefit. Adopted by the City Council this 22d day of August, 2017. Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid -2295- W1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ,O FROM: • Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 16, 2017 17-26 Variance LOCATION: 2025 Lakeside Lane (PID No. 18-117-23-32-0019) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential H K The applicant, Betz Builders, is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a new single- family home on an undersized, existing lot of record located at 2025 Lakeside Lane. The application is being made on behalf of the property owner, Brian Blake, who recently purchased the property. The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their August 15th special meeting. A variance for the existing lot size for the original platted lot is requested that does not contain a principal structure, to allow construction of a new, conforming single-family home. There is an existing accessory structure/garage on the property that is being retained. No members of the public spoke at the meeting. A letter from the property owner at 2015 Lakeside Lane indicating he had reviewed the plans and survey for the proposed project with the owner and had no objections was provided at the meeting. A letter from the abutting property owner at 2037 Lakeside Lane was included in the agenda packet indicating there were no concerns about the proposed project. Draft meeting minutes are attached for your reference. After discussion, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requested variance application, as recommended Staff, to include conditions. Neighbors were provided written notification on August 16, 2017 that the variance request was being included on the August 22, 2017 City Council Meeting consent agenda. . •uu, .*s - Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, a resolution has been prepared for Council consideration. V4400no WHEREAS, the applicant, Tom Betz, on behalf of owner Brian Blake, is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a new single-family home on an existing, undersized lot of record at 2025 Lakeside Lane ("subject property"); and WHEREAS, Section 129-6 states that a lot of record in a residential district may be used for residential dwelling purposes provided: (1) The area thereof meets all setback and minimum lot area requirements of this chapter. In the shoreland management area, all single-family detached lots shall have a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet in the R- 1A and R-2 districts and 90,000 square feet in the R-1 district, while all two-family and twin homes in the R-2 district shall be located on lots having a minimum area of 14,000 square feet. (2) It has frontage on an improved public right-of-way. (3) It was under separate ownership from abutting lands upon or prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived. EM WHEREAS, the subject property was platted as Lot 9, Block 10, Shadywood Point; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-1 single-family residential and the minimum lot area requirement is 10,000 square feet; and square foot property has improved road frontage on Lakeside Lane and includes lakeshore on Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an accessory structure/garage, which is being retained, but does not include a single-family home; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a conforming, two-story walkout home on the subject lot; and WHEREAS, historical information from the property file indicates that water and sewer were stubbed into the subject property in 1965; and -2297- WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Report dated August 9, 2017 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 15, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend Council approval of the variance; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its August 22, 2017 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's action on the variance meets the City's decision requirements contained in Minnesota Statutes 15.99, WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129-39 (a) are met. 2. The construction of a single-family home is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The property was platted for single-family residential purposes prior to the establishment of current zoning regulations. 4. While undersized for a lot in the R-1 District, a conforming home can be built on the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the variance for the property at 2025 Lakeside Lane with the following conditions: Applicant or owner shall be responsible for payment of the following City utility fees with the building permit: a. trunk area sewer charge $2000 b. trunk area water charge $2000 C. sewer connection fee $240 d. water connection fee $240 2. Applicant or owner is responsible for any required utility work (i.e., water/sewer connection, etc.) and all required permitting. 3. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. -2299- 6. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 9. No building permits will be issued until any and/or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The variance is hereby approved for the following legally described property: LOT 9, BLOCK 90, SHADYWOOD POINT HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August, 2017. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid -2300- MUNUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY AUGUST 15, 2017 Vice Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Vice Chair David Goode; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Pelka, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Cindy Penner, Jameson Smieja, Jennifer Peterson, and Jake Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planners Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Field Officer Stewart Simon, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193`d St W, Farmington; Joseph & Marjana Schwebel, 15 Orme La, St. Paul; Brian Blake, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Barb Fritsch, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Jim Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Johnny Range, 2039 Arbor La; Jeremy Nelson, 2060 Waterside La; KC Nelson, 6500 Phoenix, Golden Valley; Torn McDonnell, 5239 Washburn Ave S, Mpls; Michelle Olson, 2060 Waterside La : 0 1 : 0' 0 2025 LAKESIDE LANE APPLICANT: TOM BETZ OWNER: BRIAN BLAKE Sarah Smith reviewed the application as follows: • Lot is part of original plat • Proposing to build a single-family home with conforming setbacks • Property owners on both sides indicate support by letter • Lot is undersized for R-1 zone but exceeds the minimum for R -1A and R-2 zone (6,000 square feet) • There is an existing structure and water and sewer is stubbed to the lot • Other undersized lots in the neighborhood • Property owner intends to retain the existing accessory structure • Hardcover will be under the 40% maximum • Staff recommends approval Bussey questioned the ordinary high water setback and building height. Smith confirmed that setback and height would be conforming. MOTION by Pelka, second by Velsor, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff with conditions 1-9 and findings of fact 1-9. MOTION carried unanimously. -2301- August 3, 2017 771 -711111i� 2`917T f I have seen the proposed plans and survey and I have no objectJons to the construction of their new home and welcome them as my new neighbor. Thank you, -2302- TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 9, 2017 PLANNING CASE NO. 17-26 SUBJECT: Variance LOCATION: 2025 Lakeside Lane (PID No. 18-117-23-32-0019) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential i 'jT4ffI C 0i010N H K' 3i The applicant, Betz Builders, is requesting a variance to allow the construction of a new single- family home on an undersized, existing lot of record located at 2025 Lakeside Lane. The application is being made on behalf of the property owner, Brian Blake, who recently purchased the property. City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. -2303- According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule. The "Day 1" was determined to be July 21, 2017, for the application. Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a letter on August 9, 2017 to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the application at its August 15, 2017 meeting. A letter was received on August 10th from Judy Ess who owns the adjacent property to the south located at 2027 Lakeside Lane and has been included as an attachment. Ms. Ess has reviewed the survey and plans and has no objections to the current request. 0 : , 1 , The 8,359 foot property has improved road frontage on Lakeside Lane and includes Lakeshore on Lake Minnetonka. The property currently includes an accessory structure/garage but does not include a single-family home. As shown in the materials provided, the applicant is proposing to construct a conforming, two-story walkout home on the subject lot. The following table summarizes the proposed new home to be constructed: -2304- Required Proposed Variance Front Yard 30 30 feet + - Rear Yard 50 feet 50 feet + - Side Yard (north) 6.0 feet 6.1 feet - Side Yard (south) 10 feet 10 feet - Hardcover (40% maximum) 3,343.6 SF 2,942 SF* - -2304- Note: Information from hardcover calculation sheet from Advance Surveying & Eng, dated 8-10-2017 STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all involved departments, consultants and agencies for review and comment. Comments received are summarized below: Chase Vanderbilt, MCWD From a preliminary review, the proposed single family home at 2025 Lakeside Lane in the City of Mound will most likely need a MCWD Erosion Control Permit. An Erosion Control Permit is required from the District for land disturbance of 5,000 sf and/or 50 cy of excavation/fill. Vickie Schleuning, LMCD No issues with this application. Executive Director DISCUSSION A variance is being requested because the lot is under the minimum 10,000 square feet lot size for a Lakeshore lot as required by Section 129-6 of the City Code, Sec. 129-6. Existing lots of record. A lot of record in a residential district may be used for residential dwelling purposes provided: (1) The area thereof meets all setback and minimum lot area requirements of this chapter. In the shoreland management area, all single-family detached lots shall have a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet in the R -1A and R-2 districts and 10,000 square feet in the R-1 district, while all two-family and twin homes in the R-2 district shall be located on lots having a minimum area of 14,000 square feet. (2) It has frontage on an improved public right-of-way. (3) It was under separate ownership from abutting lands upon or prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter is derived. ® This property is an existing lot of record (Lot 9, Block 10, SHADYWOOD POINT, Hennepin County, MN) that was platted prior to the establishment of current zoning regulations. Information from Hennepin County website indicates the existing accessory structure was constructed in 1950. Water/sewer was stubbed into the lot in 1965. • There are undersized lots in the subject vicinity. The existing accessory structure is being retained and is considered as an existing condition. The applicant has shown a building footprint for the new home that is conforming to setback and hardcover. This will be confirmed during the building permit process along with other zoning regulations that apply to the proposed new house construction project, including but not limited to, building height, eaves, driveway location/design, mechanical equipment, bay windows, etc. Applicant is advised that the submitted plans with the variance application have not gone through the building plan review as part of the variance application process. In accordance with City Code Sec. 129-39 (a), Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of a variance to construct a home on an undersized existing lot of record in the R-1 District subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant or owner shall be responsible for payment of the following City utility fees with the building permit: a. trunk area sewer charge $2000 b. trunk area water charge $2000 C. sewer connection fee $ 240 d. water connection fee $ 240 2. Applicant or owner is responsible for any required utility work (i.e., water/sewer connection, etc.) and all required permitting. 3. Applicant shall be limited to no more than 40% hardcover on the site as required by City Code. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information for building permit issuance. 6. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the variance application is approved. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. -2306- 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided. 9. No building permits will be issued until any and/or all fees associated with the land use application have been paid unless an escrow deposit of sufficient amount is on file with the City. In recommending Staff approval, the following findings of fact are offered. 1. The criteria included City Code Section 129-39 (a) are met. 2. The construction of a single-family home is a reasonable use of the residentially zoned property and is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of both the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan. 3. The property was platted for single-family residential purposes prior to the establishment of current zoning regulations. 4. While undersized for a lot in the R-1 District, a conforming home can be built on the property. In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is Tuesday, August 22, 2017. -2307- 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 ,s PAID a 04 JUL 192017 VICITY OF MOUND VARIANCE: APPLICATION. Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. fZ Planning Commission Date City Council Date F:HMRZV.�L••- �IJEMR_'-M SUBJECT Address 2025 Lakeshore Lane PROPERTY LEGAL Lot 009 Block 010 DESC. Subdivision Shad)mood Point PID # 18-117-23-32-0019 Zoning: (D R1A R2 R3 BI B2 B3 (circle one) PROPERTY Name Brian Blake C 911 Email 9 OWNER V Address 4568 Denbigh Rd. Mound MN 55364 Phone Cell— 952-221-9503 Work Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN (21de Address J_ a Z_6 /1 V, OWNER) Phone Home4/2-9 Work Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No ( X ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): 2 story walkout for SFR (owner's primary residence) approx 33'X 56' (4000 sq ft) (-see attached plans for further description) Variance Information (1/10/2017) Page 4 of 6 -2308- Case No. I t 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): N/A it's a vacant lot. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E W) 30 Side Yard: (N S E W) 10 Side Yard: (N S E W) 6 ft. ft. ✓ ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. '� ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) _ 0 ft. ft. / ft. : (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. Street Frontage: 60 ft. 49.97 ft. 10.03 ft. Lot Size: 10,000 sq ft 8,359 sq ft 1.641 sq ft Hardcover: 3,343.6 sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (X ), No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( X) too narrow ( ) topography ( ) soil ( X) too small ( ) drainage ( ) existing situation ( ) too shallow ( ) shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: This vacant lot doesn't meet newer codes for 10,000 sq ft lot size 60' width, 60' street frontage Variance Information (1/10/2017) Page 5 of 6 -2309- Case No. I I 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No ( X ). If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No ( X ). If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( X ), No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: This is an exceptional circumstance, if there had been an existing home on the lot to be demoed. this variance would not be rewired The home will fit nicely into the neighborhood aesthetically like the homes next to it The home will still conform to all p=erty setbacks I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. 0/7 Owners Signature Date f1 //)'E7�' g Variance Information (1/1012017) Page 6 of 6 -2310- 01 HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) FPROPERTY ADDESS: 2025 LAKE SIDE LANE, MOUND i OWNER'S NAME: BETZ BUILDERS LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ........ LOT AREA 8,359 SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) .... - ............. ... - 1 3,343.6 * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official, LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X X 1, 866 sf TOTAL HOUSE ................ DETACHED BUILDINGS X (GARAGE/SHED) X 248 sf TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ..... ......... ......... DRIVEWAY, PARKING X = Note: AREAS, SIDEWALKS, Proposed Paver Drive: ETC. X Total=o58 square feet X 85% credit=84 square feet 348 sf TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ DECKS open decks (1/4" min. X Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X Counted as hardcover. X 400 sf TOTALDECK ... .......... ..................................... X X TOTAL OTHER .................................................... 80 sf TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE... ............... ...... ....... ................. 2,942 UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) .................... ....... ............ ......... ....... UNDER 402 SF PREPARED BY Advance Surveying & Eng. DATE 8-10-17 Revised 1/10 -2311- ,august 3, 2017 111111111111111p 11 MI IIIII i� IIII iiiiiiij 11111111 !111 111111 1 • - Mound I have seen the proposed plans and survey and i have no objections to the construction of their new home and welcome them as my new neighbor. Thank you, -2312- t 940.0 94 ; 937.2X INSTALL SILT--- s FENCE/810 ROLL INFORMA770N. 9361 `�. -- -_-�-- y X96. 5' 3p 0 .' 6" 24 �X9331 ENTRANCE PER N07ES FOUND IRON Js Fn\ SAO 946.6 X 946.5 10" ASEQ945 � 931T 931.10 v a ` 931.2 �' �X 934,5 \\ 9 .5 9�X ZN ,-BENCHMARK: TOP OF MANHOLE 945.5 v APPROXMA X IOCA 77ON OF EXI577NG �\4ss SANITARY SCHER yo ,� S£RV10E UNE PER C17Y 9a5 ti AS—BUIL T INFORMA nON. X 9460,.-APPROXIMA7E 453 LOCA )70A( OF £XIS77NG WA 7£R SERV7C£ UNE 9459 \ 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUW, SPEORCATON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNM MY DIRECT y PERN9GN ANI Till I AM A DAY UCE sm OW 1 PER GT 7Y AS—BUILT 11 946' SHEET SIZE 17 X 22 INFORMA770N. ,[ 9", � e `�. - INSTALL ROCK CONSMUC770N 5' 3p 0 .' 6" SHEET SHEET NO. ENTRANCE PER N07ES 4 s ` J�O & ENGINEERING, CO. 946.6 X 946.5 10" ASEQ945 pR �. \\ 9 .5 �3 \$"' 6 - 468 ` X 9471 xi/Q 45.8 `g aT 9Z$ o y of �, ✓ �Yr I 45.11 9 94 476 spy 45 9� ,, x44.6y `'o REMOVE 7RE£ (5) a4s 9303 r,D 931. 1m 936,1 'd2 9A 1C (sl x `b,7 929.3 �� 20" y1 931.3 '31 \ 31 930 si3 �GP� ,l -INSTALL SILT v0 FENCE/810 ROLL 9293 2�.9 450,8�y FOUND IRON--- v� ORDINARY HIGH ---'� WATER MARK, 929.4 \ AUG 0 9 2017 j 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUW, SPEORCATON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNM MY DIRECT y PERN9GN ANI Till I AM A DAY UCE sm OW DATE SURVEYED: - JULY 11, 2017 SHEET TITLE SHEET SIZE 17 X 22 ENGINEER THE LAWS OF TIE STATE OF MINN MW SURVEYED BY: ADVANCED SURV. PPnPOSED SURVEY SHEET SHEET NO. l/�i & ENGINEERING, CO. ng & Engineering, Co. X77 DRAWING NUMBER 17()x94 JR si SHEEP 1 OF 1 J a S. Rinke 52716 DATE DRAFTED: JULY 14, 2017 17917 Highway 7 retonka. Minnesota 55345 Ph.e (952) 474-7964 Web: ww:v.eaysur.cbm UCE�+se No. JULY 14 2017 I^Te Q-1,11 U; �f #' It Ali Qi #f 'r+ og ; o i I I I ^"i .rn..,rn soc ��..,. T -9i SO �-6-9 �. M 11 t f$ 31 - y pgpe if n�i 1.rIj Flal M 1 E z �i �' i $',s um -2316- N iA m GA 2317- if 40 W-9 I A4 %Sj it I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Honorable Mayor and City Council Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 16, 2017 17-26 Variance Application (New/Modified) 4804-4820 Northern Road Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential HK 31 i BACKGROUND In August, 2016, Tom McDougall, on behalf of McDougall Investments, LLC, received variance approval to allow for construction of two (2) accessory garages and to undertake site modifications at 4804-4820 Northern Road including removal of a detached garage, redesign and replacement of the existing driveways and parking areas, new sidewalks, landscaping alterations and tree planting. Post -construction, hardcover was reduced on the site from 53 percent to slightly under 40 percent. The variances approved for the project are described below: • The proposed detached garage (west side) did not meet the required 20 -foot distance from the garage doors to the lot line. ® The proposed driveway/parking areas would be located within 10 feet of the existing apartment building. • Two of the proposed driveways did not meet the required 25 foot width requirement of the R-3 regulations. ® The proposed driveway/outdoor parking areas would be located within 20 feet of the ROW and within 10 feet of adjacent property lines, which is a requirement of the R-3 regulations. ® A variance from the parking requirement in the R-3 regulations (21/2 spaces per unit, 1 of which must be indoors.) • A variance from required concrete material for walkways to allow use of a pervious paver product for some of the sidewalks/walkways. ® Variance from the provisions of Sec. 129-103 (e) (5) (f) regarding plantings/landscaping along property lines. -2319- The variance approved for the "west" accessory structure was for a side -loaded accessory garage as the garage doors were located less than 20 feet from the lot line. A new/replacement variance is being requested as the applicant is proposing to modify the site design previously approved to construct a front loaded accessory structure that does not meet the 20 -foot front setback requirement. The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their August 15th special meeting. The applicant is requesting a new/replacement variance to modify the project to allow a front- loaded garage instead of a side loaded garage. With the current proposal, the hardcover is slightly reduced, the front setback from Northern is increased and the side setback increases from the original proposal. No members of the public spoke at the meeting. Letters from the abutting property owners expressing support for the project were included as attachments to the Planning Report. Draft meeting minutes are attached for your reference. After discussion, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the requested new/amended variance application, as recommended Staff, subject to conditions. Neighbors were provided written notification on August 16, 2017 that the variance request was being included on the August 22, 2017 City Council Meeting consent agenda. G •P�Ti�il 1B7%dIQi!1 Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, a resolution to amend and restate Resolution No. 14-124 that approved variances for the project has been prepared for Council consideration. The draft resolution shows the new/amended variances in strike- out/underlined format to highlighted the modifications related to the current request. The final version will not included the strikeout/underlined information. -2320- • • • •M• 0 WHEREAS, the applicant, Tom McDougall, on behalf of McDougall Investments, LLC, previously submitted an application requesting variance approval to allow for construction of two (2) accessory garages and to undertake site modifications at 4804- 4820 Northern Road which includes removal of an existing detached garage, redesign and replacement of the existing driveways and parking areas, new sidewalks, landscaping alterations and tree planting. With the site redesign. overall hardcover on the property was reduced on the site from 53 percent to slightly under 40 percent; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-3 Multiple Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the City Council, at its October 11, 2016 meeting, adopted Resolution No. 16-124 which approved the following variances for the project, subject to conditions: 1. The proposed detached garage (west side) does not meet the required 20 foot distance from the garage door to the lot line. 2. The proposed driveway/parking areas will be located within 10 feet of the existing apartment building 3. Two of the proposed driveways do not meet the required 25 foot width requirement of the R-3 regulations. 4. The proposed driveway/outdoor parking areas will be located within 20 feet of the ROW and within 10 feet of adjacent property lines which is a requirement of the R-3 regulations. 5. A variance from the parking requirement in the R-3 regulations (2 1/2 spaces per unit, 1 of which must be indoors.) 6. A variance from required concrete material for walkways to allow use of a pervious paver product for some of the sidewalks/walkways. 7. A variance from the provisions of Sec. 129-103 (e) (5) (f) regarding plantings/landscaping along property lines. and; WHEREAS, details regarding the original variances for the proposed project are contained in Planning Report No. 16-31 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and -2321- WHEREAS, on July 21, 2017, the applicant submitted an application requesting a new / modified variance to allow a reduced front setback for a proposed front -loaded accessory structure. The required front setback is 20 feet per code. A front setback of 13.8 feet is proposed for the new/modified accessory structure/garage; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. M WHEREAS, details regarding the new/modified variance request to construct a front loaded accessory structure/garage as part of the proposed site modification project are contained in Planning Report No. 17-27 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and -2322- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the new/modified variance request at its August 15, 2017 meeting and recommended approval, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the new/modified variance request at its August 22, 2017 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's action on the new/amended variance meets the City's decision requirements contained in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. It is reasonable that the applicant seeks to continue to use the site for multi- family apartment use. 2. The use of the site for multi -family residential is in keeping with the land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 4. Site layout and design is influenced by a number of factors, including the site size, the existing location of the apartment, Lake Minnetonka and Northern Road. 5. The current proposal, post construction, slightly reduces hardcover from the original proposal. 6. The current proposal, post construction, will meet the 30 percent green/open space and 40 percent maximum coverage requirements for driveways/parking/garages as required in the R-3 regulations. 7. Site drainage will be improved on the site. 8. Indoor and outdoor parking for the apartments is increased on the site as a result of the project. 9. The design and materials of the front -loaded detached garage is similar to the existing apartments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve variances for the property at 4804-4820 Northern Road, as amended and restated, with the following conditions: Variance No. 1 in Resolution 16-124 is modified to read as follows: The proposed detached garage (west side) does not meet the required 20 foot front setback to the property line on the south side. distanGe fr-oln the ga�� Gfogr tP- the In -t 1i The requested front setback of 13.8 feet for the front loaded accessory structure /garage is approved -2323- 2. Variance No. 3 in Resolution No. 16-124 is modified to read as follows: due One of the proposed new driveways does not meet the required 25 foot width requirement of the R-3 regulations. 3. With the exception of Variance No. 1 and Variance No. 2, which are being modified by this resolution, the City's approval of variances for the project in Resolution No. 14-124 shall remain in full effect, to include all conditions. The variances are described below: 2. The proposed driveway/parking areas will be located within 90 feet of the existing apartment building 4. The proposed driveway/outdoor parking areas will be located within 20 feet of the ROW and within 90 feet of adjacent property lines which is a requirement of the R-3 regulations. 5. A variance from the parking requirement in the R-3 regulations (2 9/2 spaces per unit, 9 of which must be indoors.) 6. A variance from required concrete material for walkways to allow use of a pervious paver product for some of the sidewalks/walkways. 7. A variance from the provisions of Sec. 129-103 (e) (5) (f) regarding plantings/landscaping along property lines. 4. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 5. A building permit will be required for the proposed garage construction project. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process; also green/open space and driveway/parking areas/garage coverage requirements in the R-3 regulations will be verified and must meet the specific requirements. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 9. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. -2324- 10. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 11. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit must be provided before release of any future building permit. 12. The lowest floor of the proposed garages shall meet the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation of 933.0 feet. 13. The new parking spaces shall be striped. The amended and restated variances are hereby approved for the following legally described property: In Lots 24-26, Subdivision of lots 1 & 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood, and adjacent vacated Northern Avenue Hennepin County, Minnesota Legal Description of premises: Lot 24 except that part described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Lot 24; thence East along the Southerly line of said Lot 24, a distance of 3 7. 00 feet; thence Northeasterly to the Northwest corner of said Lot 24; thence Southwesterly along the Westerly line of said Lot 24 to the point of beginning, All of Lot 25, That part of Lot 26 lying Westerly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said Lot, 43.8 feet West from the Southeast corner thereof to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot, 22.9 feet Westerly from the Northeast corner thereof, All in SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 32, SKARP AND LUNDQUIST'S RAVENSWOOD, Hennepin County, Minnesota, ALSO that portion of Beverly Avenue (now known as Northern Lane) as dedicated to the public by the recorded plot of Subdivision of Lots 1 and 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 27, said Subdivision of Lots 1 and 32 Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood, thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 27 a distance of 20.00 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 26, thence Westerly along the South line of Lots 26, 25 and 24 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 24; thence southeasterly to a point 15 feet Southerly of and 37 feet Westerly of said Southwest comer, • thence Southeasterly to a point 20 feet Southerly, and 100 feet Easterly of said Southwest corner of Lot 24; thence Easterly to the point of beginning, which lies Westerly of the Southerly extension of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said Lot 26, 43.8 feet west from the Southeast corner thereof to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 22.9 feet Westerly from the Northeast corner thereof, and which lies Easterly of a line drawn South from a point on the Southerly line of said Lot 24 distant 37.00 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 24, to a point 15 feet Southerly of and 37 feet Easterly of said Southwest corner of Lot 24. -2325- Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August, 2017 Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid -2326- MINUTE EXCERPTS AUGUST 15, 2017 Vice Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Vice Chair David Goode; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Pelka, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Cindy Penner, Jameson Smieja, Jennifer Peterson, and Jake Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planners Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Field Officer Stewart Simon, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193rd St W, Farmington; Joseph & Marjana Schwebel, 15 Orme La, St. Paul; Brian Blake, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Barb Fritsch, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Jim Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Johnny Range, 2039 Arbor La; Jeremy Nelson, 2060 Waterside La; KC Nelson, 6500 Phoenix, Golden Valley; Tom McDonnell, 5239 Washburn Ave S, Mpls; Michelle Olson, 2060 Waterside La BOARD OF APPEALS PLANNING CASE NO. 17-27 VARIANCE — FRONT LOADED DETACHED GARAGE 4804 NORTHERN ROAD APPLICANT: TOM McDOUGALL Sarah Smith reviewed the application as follows: • Previous variance approvals include: lot line setback, parking area/drive location, driveway width, number of parking stalls, walkway material, and planting and landscaping along property lines • Proposing a front loaded garage (same structure previously approved, but modified from side loaded to front loaded) • Twenty -foot setback is required along Northern Rd • Side setback will improve to 10 feet and hardcover will also improve • Property owners on both sides indicate support by letter • Improved maneuverability • Consistent with original approvals • Structure is further back from road with modified proposal • Staff recommends approval Velsor questioned the location of the easterly driveway/parking area. -2327- Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2017 Tom McDougall (5239 Washburn Ave S, Mpls) stated that the project was started last fall. The existing driveway along Northern Road was all asphalt. It will be cut back and will bring the hardcover down to 40 percent as a part of this upcoming project. MOTION by Bussey, second by Pelka, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff with conditions 1-10 and findings of fact 1-9. MOTION carried unanimously. -2328- ri TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: PLANNING CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 9, 2017 Variance 17-27 Tom McDougall, McDougall Investments, LLC 4804-4820 Northern Road (PID No. 13-117-24-44-0094) August 15, 2017 High Density Residential R-3 Multiple Family Residential In August, 2016, Tom McDougall, on behalf of McDougall Investments, LLC, received variance approval to allow for construction of two (2) accessory garages and to undertake site modifications at 4804-4820 Northern Road including removal of a detached garage, redesign and replacement of the existing driveways and parking areas, new sidewalks, landscaping alterations and tree planting. Post -construction, hardcover was reduced on the site from 53 percent to 40 percent with the project. The variances approved for the project are outlined below: • The proposed detached garage (west side) did not meet the required 20 -foot distance from the garage doors to the lot line. e The proposed driveway/parking areas would be located within 10 feet of the existing apartment building. • Two of the proposed driveways did not meet the required 25 foot width requirement of the R-3 regulations. • The proposed driveway/outdoor parking areas would be located within 20 feet of the ROW and within 10 feet of adjacent property lines, which is a requirement of the R-3 regulations. ® A variance from the parking requirement in the R-3 regulations (21/2 spaces per unit, 1 of which must be indoors.) -2329- e A variance from required concrete material for walkways to allow use of a pervious paver product for some of the sidewalks/walkways. ® Variance from the provisions of Sec. 129-103 (e) (5) (f) regarding plantings/landscaping along property lines. The variance approved for the "west" accessory structure was for a side -loaded accessory garage as the garage doors were located less than 20 feet from the lot line. A new/replacement variance is needed as the applicant is proposing to modify the site design previously approved to construct a front loaded accessory structure that does not meet the 20 - foot front setback requirement. SITE INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND The subject site, which is approximately 21,033 square feet, includes an apartment building containing six (6) units that front Northern Road on the south side and Lake Minnetonka on the north side. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Trail is located on the south side of Northern Road. The subject property contains both interior and exterior parking. Outdoor parking generally takes place on the south side abutting Northern Road. Resolution No. 87-48 was approved in 1987 approving a CUP and variance for the construction of a multiple family dwelling (2 new units, 4 existing units) at 4810 Northern Road. The zoning at the time, was B-2 and multiple family dwellings were allowed by CUP. The current zoning is R-3 and multiple family structures with 3 to 6 units are permitted uses. Details about the original project and variance approvals are contained in Planning Report No. 16-124, which has been included as an attachment to this report. A copy of the official resolution filed at Hennepin County has also been included. The original variance for the side loaded garage showed a setback of 8.5 feet. The new/modified request is for a front loaded garage which is to be located 13.8 feet from the front property line. A 20 -foot front setback is required for a front loaded accessory structure/garage. The "east" accessory structure/garage was constructed in 2016. Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. -2330- Page 2 (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60 -day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, "Day 1" is determined to be July 22, 2017 as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 645.15. Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a letter on August 9, 2017 to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the application at its August 15, 2017 meeting. Members are advised that letters in support of the project were received from neighboring properties and have been included as attachments to the report. -2331- Page 3 STAFF / CONSULTANT / AGENCY / UTILITIES REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants, and public agencies for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received as part of the routing and review process have been addressed and, are therefore, not included in this report. See comments provided below: Eric Hoversten, City Managen-Director of Public Works. No issues with this application. Vickie Schleuning, LIVICD Executive Director No issues with this application. Chase Vanderbilt, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District From a preliminary review, the proposed garage and parking lot improvements at 4804 Northern Road in the City of Mound will potentially need a MCWD Erosion Control permit. An Erosion Control permit is required from the District for land disturbance of 5,000 sf and/or 50 cy of excavation/fill. The proposed impervious surface reduced imperviousness by 13%, which will not trigger a MCWD Stormwater Management Permit. If the project was reducing imperviousness by 0-9% or imperviousness was increasing, the MCWD's Stormwater Management Rule would be triggered. Members are advised that the applicant, on August 4, 2017, provided a copy of the MCWD permit issued for the project. With the exception of the requested variance for the modified design of the accessory structure (side load to front load), the project is consistent with the City's original approvals based on Staff review. There are also improved conditions with the modified plan: - The current proposal increases the proposed side setback for the structure to the west property line from 6 feet to 10 feet. - Hardcover is slightly reduced from 39.7 percent to 39.6 percent. - The driveway for the proposed west garage is increased with the current proposal and is shown as conforming to the R-3 requirement (25 feet minimum width). The original variance for the side loaded garage showed a setback of 8.5 feet. The front loaded garage is proposed to be located 13.8 feet from the front property line. -2332- Page 4 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the new/replacement variance required for the front loaded accessory garage project at 4804 Northern Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. A building permit will be required for the proposed garage construction project. 4. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process; also green/open space and driveway/parking areas/garage coverage requirements in the R-3 regulations will be verified and must meet the specific requirements. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. 8. Effective September, 2011, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit must be provided before release of any future building permit. 9. The lowest floor of the proposed garages shall meet the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation of 933.0 feet. -2333- Page 5 Staff's recommendation for approval is based on the following findings of fact: 1. It is reasonable that the applicant seeks to continue to use the site for multi -family apartment use. 2. The use of the site for multi -family residential is in keeping with the land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 4. Site layout and design is influenced by a number of factors, including the site size, the existing location of the apartment, Lake Minnetonka and Northern Road. 5. The current proposal, post construction, slightly reduces hardcover from the original proposal. 6. The current proposal, post construction, will meet the 30 percent green/open space and 40 percent maximum coverage requirements for driveways/parking/garages as required in the R-3 regulations. 7. Site drainage will be improved on the site. 8. Indoor and outdoor parking for the apartments is increased on the site as a result of the project. 9. The design and materials of the front -loaded detached garage is similar to the existing apartments. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, It is anticipated that the variance application will be considered by the City Council at its August 22, 2017 meeting. -2334- Page 6 1► T `C! OF MOU APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No.' City Council Date ��nn Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address -460 ' '"451P N®j, A -epbi fzam) wcv 1 W° N PROPERTY 41 LEGAL Lot ¢°� Block DESC. Subdivision PID # Zoning: R1, RIA R2(9 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name L, ,l.- Email �"r.�•�_Gt�tGdo l OWNER Address Z?1j W AVC Phone Homeorkbt2-281-57.71 Fax APPLICANT Namalm �,�"rwG(z� ( Email'pttite„P441A0tiCz I (. !9S (IF OTHER L-27.aC'��IU1Z/SI Gl�'tl�1N�° GyJ S! THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home 612-170 - Z -+4f- fork Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes X) No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. Al 1i OF MOUND 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Variance Information (1/1012017) Page 4 of 6 -2335- Case No. 11-Z-1 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): SETBACKS: Front Yard: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: ( N S E W ) Side Yard: (N S E W ) Rear Yard: ( N S E W ) Lakeside: (N S E W ) ft. (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover. REQUIRED REQUESTED `M (or existing) ft. sq ft sq ft ft. sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (x), No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that -zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: ( ) topography ( ) drainage jQ shape ( ) soil existing situation other: specify Variance Information (1110/2017) Page 5 of 6 -2336- 1 W4 ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft ft. sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. ft. sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes (x), No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that -zoning district? ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: ( ) topography ( ) drainage jQ shape ( ) soil existing situation other: specify Variance Information (1110/2017) Page 5 of 6 -2336- 1 W4 Case No. 13 _Z 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), NoK If yes, explain: 7. Was the practic I difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes( ),No X. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes K. No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: t ,-4 / eA I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted Herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that 1 have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature Date ®4_�� k G(..� Applicant's Signature""�..._ Date�_� �- Variance information (1/10/2017) Page 6 of 6 -2337- Attachment for 4804 — 4820 Northern Road Mound, MN Variance Application 7/20/2017 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): In the fall of 2016 a variance was granted for the purpose and conditions submitted below on 8/15/2017. The East garage was completed in the fall of 2016 in accordance with the approved variance and applicable permits. This proposed variance, desires to modify the West garage to change from the approved side -loaded garage orientation to a front -loaded garage orientation within the Mound, MN R3 zoning district. The proposed modification is planned to improve entering and exiting the driveway onto the public -right -a -way, from both a visibility, maintenance, drainage, and safety standpoint. It will also extend the front and side yard setbacks of the west garage structure as compared to the variances granted for the West garage in 2016, which will improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood. The proposed modification will result in: The West garage is setback further from the street property line by 15 feet as compared to 8.5 feet as approved last fall. The garage and the street right away is not perpendicular due to the angular nature of streets and lots around Lake Minnetonka. The driveway length from street curb to garage on easterly driveway edge is 23.5 feet, and 36.0 feet on the westerly driveway edge. See setback drawing. 2. The West garage will be set back from the side lot line by 10 feet as compared to 6 feet as approved last fall. The driveway will be set back from the side yard property line by 11 feet, Except for a 10 foot section at the extreme North East corner of the lot which has an irregular shape requiring a technical variance for this request. See setback drawing. 3. The West garage is located 20 feet from the existing apartment buildings. 4. The proposed modification will maintain and reduce slighting the impervious area on the site by 44 square feet as compared to the previous plan. The proposed modification plan impervious area is 39.6% as compared to 39.7% SUBMITTAL ON 8/15/2017 The purpose of the proposed project is to improve the functionality and aesthetics of the multi- family property by: -2338- • Providing 4 new indoor parking spaces in 2 detached one story garage buildings, which allows the property to conform to current indoor parking requirements established in the R3 zoning ordinance. • Removing an existing old detached garage which is currently not used for parking vehicles, and due to its slab elevation creates a drainage problem on the property which can now be corrected. • Removing, regrading, and replacing existing driveways to direct storm water onto lawn area to increase storm water percolation on property. • Reducing the current impervious surface area from 53% to 40% by reducing existing asphalt driveway areas and converting into lawn. • Removing a maple tree that was planted over the existing sanitary sewer service which will be damaged when repairing the settlement of the sanitary sewer service. • Removing a large oak tree that is dying and located adjacent to the existing garage which will be removed, which will make the root system unstable. • Planting 6 new deciduous shade trees on the south side of the property to shade the buildings in the summer, and provide solar gain in the winter. 9. Comments I have been in communication and meetings with City of Mound staff and MNSPECT. The proposed setbacks meet the R2 zoning requirements. The project site is adjacent to R2 zoned property on the east and west sides of the property. Discussions with MNSPECT identified that a detached structure less than 3,000 square feet and used for parking cars only, can be built within 5 feet of an existing structure on site. Each garage structure is approximately 500 square feet and further than 5 feet from an existing structure. Based on the scale of these buildings MNSPECT also stated that I would not need to have a licensed architect sign off on the garage drawings. -2339- q - HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: 14411f)A 1.44 JfA IP71n AA -7 OWNER'S NAME: Me LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ........................................C_-� LOT AREA G t SQ. FT. X 40% = for Lots of Record ... I ...................... Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official, LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X X TOTAL HOUSE .................... ......... ............ DETACHED BUILDINGS x :?/. "- = (GARAGE/SHED) '4426 1 1 4q TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS.. ............. q 0'5 . t DRIVEWAY, PARKING_ J, AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. X X TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........................................ 3 37A 47 DECKS Open decks (1/4' min. X Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X counted as hardcover. X TOTALDECK ....................................................... X -- - X TOTAL OTHER ................ TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ..... UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ........................ ...... ........ PREPARED Byq2�q DATE I L Revised 1/10 -2340- ------------- HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS . (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) IPROPERTY ADDESS: Z-+901+ N10fzr4C--2—N OWNER'S NAME: IM�.00V6,4't-L / f14 x/rST,%,16--4—N LOT AREA SO. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ...................... LOT AREA �— Z1, 0-33 SQ. FT. X 40% = (for L ots of Record) ............................. E)dsting Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section'129-385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE 57-, q X 3 a.� 10 53 T - TOTALOTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFArF: UNDER / 4VE indicate difference) .......................................... I ......................... PREPARED BY V rod DATE Revised 1/10 -2341-b;, 7 #1 47, > is TOTALHOUSE .................................................... 4106 DETACHED BUILDINGS x &Ai2A6 6 (GARAGE/SHED) X TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... DRIVEWAY, PARKING AREAS, SIDEWALKS, x - f3l-174-co"L. P41Z4. ETC. x CC -IJ,-, LAA4 Ve-'5 -I- PA -7,e0,r;, X =_17 60 -CrzA11Cc- TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ................................. I ....... 6 5-6Z DECKS open decks (1/4, min. x Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not x counted as hardcover. X TOTALDECK ....................................................... X X TOTALOTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER I IMPERVIOUS SURFArF: UNDER / 4VE indicate difference) .......................................... I ......................... PREPARED BY V rod DATE Revised 1/10 -2341-b;, 7 #1 47, > is Northern Road - Proposed Impervious calculations 7/20/2017 -2342- Netchange from previous submittal (43.75) square feet 578.5 (132.00) 8.55 (8.55) 27 9.00 27 9.00 108 9.00 102 (33.00) 10.35 153.65 18 (6.00) 176 (48.00) 6.3 3.15 Lot Area 21,033 Element Pervious factor Length Width Area % imp Cum % Imp House 1 1 52.9 38.8 2,052.52 9.8% 9.8% House 2 1 2,033.70 9.7% 19.4% 4,086.22 Garage 1 1 21.33 21.33 454.97 2.2% 21.6% Garage 2 1 21.33 21.33 454.97 2.2% 23.8% 909.94 Driveway 1 1 23.5 19 446.50 2.1% 25.9% Driveway 2 1 29 35 1,015.00 4.8% 30.7% Driveway 3 1 21 19 399.00 1.9% 32.6% 1,860.50 New Walk A 0.15 0 0 - 0.0% 32.6% New Walk B 1 9 4 36.00 0.2% 32.8% New Walk C 1 9 4 36.00 0.2% 32.9% New Walk D 1 4 3 12.00 0.1% 33.0% New Walk E 1 39 3 117.00 0.6% 33.6% New Walk F 1 11 3 33.00 0.2% 33.7% New Walk G 1 23 3 69.00 0.3% 34.0% New Walk H 1 41 4 164.00 0.8% 34.8% New Walk 1 1 3 4 12.00 0.1% 34.9% 479.00 Existing Patio A 1 50 8 400.00 1.9% 36.8% Existing Patio B 1 14 8 112.00 0.5% 37.3% Existing Patio C 1 16 8 128.00 0.6% 37.9% Existing Patio D 0.15 18 3 8.10 0.0% 38.0% Existing Patio E 0.15 5 4.5 3.38 0.0% 38.0% Existing Patio F 0.15 21 3 9.45 0.0% 38.0% Existing Patio G 1 9 4 36.00 0.2% 38.2% Existing Patio H 1 9 4 36.00 0.2% 38.4% Existing Patio 1 1 25 5.5 137.50 0.7% 39.0% Existing Patio J 1 9 8 72.00 0.3% 39.4% Existing Patio K 1 3 6 18.00 0.1% 39.4% Existing Patio L 1 7 5 35.00 0.2% 39.6% 995.43 Total 8,331.08 8,331.08 Lot area 21,033.00 % impervious 39.6% -2342- Netchange from previous submittal (43.75) square feet 578.5 (132.00) 8.55 (8.55) 27 9.00 27 9.00 108 9.00 102 (33.00) 10.35 153.65 18 (6.00) 176 (48.00) 6.3 3.15 r-f[v-ZS6 :��ziu-iao YSfSS + �, 1wA .aOT".M tlIX� Ssr 6g1NKY'Id aNv'I 4KOA268(16 ONYT S89NKIONS 9d1� q�Z-S _tit �� oy, e�.� ____. _-_—._ 'ONI 'S2,LV13OSSV V OUREWOUD 133'02d CV --- --- or j r r W t � 4 --- -- -- zrr rr 7, os ars s " 01, a r � v� a i a �•. -,A r4 Ln N / s ; F.— i rti � QI.,9 q ZNV as r .H�. $ w U 5wt< o \\`` !�CY rzzra_ ♦♦♦ •y ,� ♦ /'f 7t €1,4 � �Y fir tea Pl �� ♦♦♦ "'�?♦ ..{ \.3 1� �` ,I,•_z �� 1^\ _w U O e7AZ g�F� ♦♦♦ <a i �i dII 3 n. s y E H Z 8 s t s ♦♦♦♦ .� `; a q}iy✓ ��`..$ e... �.. t tp S j^v ♦♦ F ar .� e1♦ i n. wwo Y sl faZz k a!`5 Y e>da 4 s e RP6g j ♦�♦\♦ r, �� #p x rnq '�€ s a 5 f v � E�5 ♦♦ o /' C12 O 5 �' p 7 � s � n y� � ♦♦♦ o � k is ES 004 �U > :a -2343-A -- S32'1b111T1d QYYI ffitl013ANI1C M1'1 x'xiihlilela IIdU W fZS —___ OIdI 'SZSBIOOSSV v mRallo i) i33POifd r } ---------------- $ Qo g - F L- a W ¢ �U 1a� gniji s> L\l.' /f �W / _ �'� huh � =t •O', 4 � F �rE .. >e �. II• }, 2 a O Xz H100 aR W w �o �i d< 7 t l �{ �� •I a co Hof W z B t,3 W 04 OP 9Hz.`' �H` z On sg" aH>Qz ��W r? � C ' 04�Q91 V� a 1 � —2343— property, the location 3 and topography, and es thereon. It does not A * -�5 26" ILVER MAPLE PAT 89 pry, EXISTING #4820 BUILD #4818 FIRST ...... FLOOR= (937.0) #4814 STOOP #4 PROPOSED 936.0 dXRA 4 4,9j-, S 100.0 S' LY LINE/ OF LOT 24/ PROPOSED DRIVEWAY (939.5) IRON ...............N 85027'4411 w 0 E 3E X 4 PROPOSEDT-k�4E xJ j/ PROPOSED TREE, EXIS ro BE 0 VED STUB 63.2 AREA -----------N 90000' -'--�SANITARY SEWER - HENNEPIN COUNTY REGIONAL R DAKOTA RAIL TRj -2344- I LN 9 I -2346- Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound, MN Re: Variance request for 4804 — 4820 Northern Road, Mound MN Dear Sarah, I own the property adjacent to the east of the above property and have reviewed with Tom McDougall the proposed modified site plan for adding a garage and new driveways. I want to let you know that I am in support of the proposed plan and believe it will be an improvement for our neighborhood. Regards, Brad Searl 4798 Northern Road Mound, MN 55364 -2347- Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound, MN Re: Variance request for 4804 —4820 Northern Road, Mound MN Dear Sarah, We live adjacent to the west of the above property and have reviewed with Tom McDougall the proposed modified site plan for adding a garage and new driveways'. We want to let you know that we are in support of the proposed plan and believe it will be an improvement for our neighborhood. Regards, &tl . O")TI—I V%L-- Ponnie and Matthew Isaak 4828 Edgewater Drive Mound, MN 55364 -2348- CERTIFICATE City of Mound STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) 1, the undersigned, being duly qualified and the Clerk of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby attest and certify that: 1. As such officer, I have the legal custody of the original record from which the attached was extracted. 2. 1 have carefully compared said extract with said original record. 3. 1 find said extract to be a true, correct and complete extract from the original minutes of a meeting of the City Council of said City held on the date indicated in said extract, including any resolution adopted at such meeting, insofar as they relate to: RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 48044820 ORTHERN ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 16-31 Said meeting was duly held, pursuant to call and notice thereof as required by law on the 11th day of October, 2016. WITNESS my hand officially as such Clerk, and the seal of said City, this 12th day of October, 2016. Catherine Pausche, Clerk -2349- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16-124 RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 4804-4820 NORTHERN ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 16-31 WHEREAS, the applicant, Tom McDougall, on behalf of McDougall Investments, LLC, submitted an application requesting variance approval to allow for construction of two (2) accessory garages and to undertake site modifications at 4804-4820 Northern Road which includes removal of an existing detached garage, redesign and replacement of the existing driveways and parking areas, new sidewalks, landscaping alterations and tree planting. With the site redesign, overall hardcover on the property is reduced on the site from 53 percent to 40 percent; and WHEREAS, the property is zoned R-3 Multiple Family Residential; and WHEREAS, the variances required for the garage addition and site modification project are described below: 1. The proposed detached garage (west side) does not meet the required 20 foot distance from the garage door to the lot line. 2. The proposed driveway/parking areas will be located within 10 feet of the existing apartment building 3. Two of the proposed driveways do not meet the required 25 foot width requirement of the R-3 regulations. 4. The proposed driveway/outdoor parking areas will be located within 20 feet of the ROW and within 10 feet of adjacent property lines which is a requirement of the R-3 regulations. 5. A variance from the parking requirement in the R-3 regulations (2 112 spaces per unit, 9 of which must be indoors.) 6. A variance from required concrete material for walkways to allow use of a pervious paver product for some of the sidewalks/walkways. 7. A variance from the provisions of Sec. 129-103 (e) (5) (f) regarding plantings/landscaping along property lines. and; WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use -2350- variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in Planning Report No. 16-31 and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its October 4, 2016 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the variance, as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its October 11, 2016 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and -2351- WHEREAS, the City Council's action on the variance meets the City's decision requirements contained in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. It is reasonable that the applicant seeks to continue to use the site for multi- family apartment use. 2. The use of the site for multi -family residential is in keeping with the land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 4. Site layout and design is influenced by a number of factors, including the site size, the existing location of the apartment, Lake Minnetonka and Northern Road. 5. The proposal, post construction, will bring overall hardcover on the site to 40 percent which is consistent with current regulations. 6. The proposal, post construction, will meet the 30 percent green/open space and 40 percent maximum coverage requirements for driveways/parking/garages as required in the R-3 regulations. 7. Site drainage will be improved on the site. 8. Indoor and outdoor parking for the apartments is increased on the site as a result of the project. 9. The design and materials of the detached garages is similar to the existing apartments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the variances for the property at 4804-4820 Northern Road with the following conditions: Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. A building permit will be required for the proposed garage construction project. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process; also green/open space and driveway/parking areas/garage coverage requirements in the R-3 regulations will be verified and must meet the specific requirements. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. -2352- 6. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 7. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit must be provided before release of any future building permit. 10. The lowest floor of the proposed garages shall meet the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation of 933.0 feet. 11. The new parking spaces shall be striped. The variances are hereby approved for the following legally described property: In Lots 24-26, Subdivision of lots 1 & 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood, and adjacent vacated Northern Avenue Hennepin County, Minnesota Legal Description of premises: Lot 24 except that part described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Lot 24; thence East along the Southerly line of said Lot 24, a distance of 37.00 feet; thence Northeasterly to the Northwest corner of said Lot 24; thence Southwesterly along the Westerly line of said Lot 24 to the point of beginning, All of Lot 25, That part of Lot 26 lying Westerly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said Lot, 43.8 feet West from the Southeast corner thereof to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot, 22.9 feet Westerly from the Northeast corner thereof, All in SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 32, SKARP AND LUNDQUIST'S RAVENSWOOD, Hennepin County, Minnesota, ALSO that portion of Beverly Avenue (now known as Northern Lane) as dedicated to the public by the recorded plot of Subdivision of Lots 1 and 32, Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 27, said Subdivision of Lots 1 and 32 Skarp & Lindquist's Ravenswood; thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 27 a distance of 20.00 feet to the Southeast corner of Lot 26; thence Westerly along the South line of Lots 26, 25 and 24 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 24; thence southeasterly to a point 15 feet Southerly of and 37 feet Westerly of said Southwest corner, thence Southeasterly to a point 20 feet Southerly, and 900 feet Easterly of said Southwest corner of Lot 24; thence Easterly to the point of beginning, which lies Westerly of the Southerly extension of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said Lot 26, 43.8 feet west from the Southeast corner thereof to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 22.9 feet Westerly from the Northeast corner thereof, and which lies Easterly of a line drawn South from a point on the Southerly line of said Lot 24 distant 3 7. 00 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 24, to a point 15 feet Southerly of and 37 feet Easterly of said Southwest corner of Lot 24. -2353- Adopted by the City Council this 11th day of October, 2016. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid -2354- r ► f affjo ael • •. Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director September 29, 2016 (revised October 5, 2016 to correct typos) Variance 16-31 Tom McDougall, McDougall Investments, LLC 4804-4820 Northern Road (PID No. 13-117-24-44-0094) October 4, 2015 Nigh Density Residential R-3 Multiple Family Residential Tom McDougall, on behalf of McDougall Investments, LLC, is requesting variance approval to allow for construction of two (2) accessory garages and to undertake site modifications at 4804-4820 Northern Road which includes removal of an existing detached garage, redesign and replacement of the existing driveways and parking areas, new sidewalks, landscaping alterations and tree planting. No changes to the existing apartment building are included in the current request. The project, when completed, will reduce hardcover on the site from 53 percent to 40 percent. Variances for the garage additions and site modification project are requested for following items: The proposed detached garage (west side) does not meet the required 20 -foot distance from the garage doors to the lot line. The proposed driveway/parking areas will be located within 10 feet of the existing apartment building. Two of the proposed driveways do not meet the required 25 foot width requirement of the R-3 regulations. The proposed driveway/outdoor parking areas will be located within 20 feet of the ROW and within 10 feet of adjacent property lines, which is a requirement of the R-3 regulations. -2355- • A variance from the parking requirement in the R-3 regulations (21/2 spaces per unit, 1 of which must be indoors.) • A variance from required concrete material for walkways to allow use of a pervious paver product for some of the sidewalks/walkways. • Variance from the provisions of Sec. 129-103 (e) (5) (f) regarding plantings/landscaping along property lines. The subject site, which is approximately 21,033 square feet, includes an apartment building containing six (6) units that front Northern Road on the south side and Lake Minnetonka on the north side. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Trail is located on the south side of Northern Road. Presently, there are 3 interior parking spaces located within the apartment building and off-street parking that takes place on the south side of the property abutting Northern Road. Resolution No. 87-48 was approved in 1987 approving a CUP and variance for the construction of a multiple family dwelling (2 new units, 4 existing units) at 4810 Northern Road. The zoning at the time, was B-2 and multiple family dwellings were allowed by CUP. The current zoning is R-3 and multiple family structures with 3 to 6 units are permitted uses. Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. in evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: -2356- Page 2 Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems RRTJWR• • Z Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.95, local government agencies are required to approve or deny land use requests within 60 days. Within the 60 -day period, an automatic extension of no more than 60 days can be obtained by providing the applicant written notice containing the reason for the extension and specifying how much additional time is needed. For the purpose of Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, "Day 1" is determined to be August 16, 2016 as provided by Minnesota Statutes Section 645.15. NOTIFICATION Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a letter on September 28, 2016 to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the application at its October 4, 2016 meeting. Members are advised that letters in support of the project were received from neighboring properties and have been included as attachments to the Planning Report. STAFF / CONSULTANT / AGENCY ® UTILITIES REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved departments, consultants agencies, and private utilities for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received as part of the routing and review process have been addressed and are therefore not included in this report. See comments provided below: Greg Pederson, Fire Chief There are no fire code or life safety concerns with this project. Heidi Quinn, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District After preliminary review, the proposed garages and driveway additions located at 4804 will trigger MCWD erosion control and stormwater management. The applicant has -2357- Page 3 received permit approval from the MCWD. 1. The existing lot is undersized as the minimum lot requirement for a multiple family dwelling in the R-3 District is 22,000 square feet. The location of the existing structures affects where improvements can take place. 2. At present there are 3 interior parking spaces and approximately 10 exterior parking spaces. The exterior parking spaces on the site are generally located on the south side of the property adjacent to Northern Road and likely are not meeting current standards. Per code, 2 1/2 parking spaces per unit, one of which is required to be inside, are required for apartments. Therefore, 6 indoor spaces and 9 outdoor spaces are required. The proposal, if approved, will provide 7 indoor and 7 outdoor parking spaces. The proposed spaces are shown at 9'x 18' which is consistent with current regulations. Adding an additional parking space adds more impervious surface to the site. 3. The proposal reduces overall hardcover on the site from 53 percent to 40 percent. 4. Proposed parking/driveway garages areas, post construction, will equal 13.8 percent, which is less than the 40 percent maximum allowance. 5. Proposed green space and landscaped areas, post construction, will be 60.5 percent, which exceeds the 30 percent minimum requirement in the R-3 regulations 6. The sideloaded garage (west side) meets the applicable setback requirements, for a Lakeshore lot of record, but does not meet the required 20 -foot building face to line requirement. 7. The frontloaded garage (east side) meets the front, side and Lakeshore setback requirements for a Lakeshore lot of record. 8. The individual buildings do not exceed 1200 square feet each or maximum allowable area of all buildings of 3000 square feet or 15 percent of total lot area. Per code, up to 3 garages / accessory buildings are allowed for a lot exceeding 10,000 square feet. 9 The height of the proposed garages will not be higher than the existing apartment buildings. 10. Sec. 129-105 (3) (5) (f) states that a landscaping shall be required and approved by the City Council. All required yards shall either be open landscaped and green areas or be left in a natural state. If any yards are to be landscaped, they shall be landscaped attractively with lawn, trees, shrubs, etc. Any areas left in a natural state shall be properly maintained in a sightly and well -kept condition. Multiple -family residential yards adjoining any of the residential R-1, R -1A and R-2 districts shall be landscaped with buffer planting screens. Plans of such screens shall be submitted for approval as a part of the site plan and installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any tract in the district. The proposed -2358- Page 4 new site plan includes the removal of hardcover and installation of new landscaped areas including tree installation. Staff's evaluation is that the new garages will provide a buffer to the adjacent residential uses. Additionally, there is limited space for plantings in the vicinity of the side lot lines. The proposed site plan meets the required tree planting requirement for multiple family dwelling project (1 tree per unit) as trees are proposed for the project. 11. The detached garages will be built identical to materials and form of the existing apartment buildings to include a 4 /12 roof pitch. Exterior siding will be cedar panels with 1 x 4 cedar vertical battens space every 16 inches painted dark brown. Fascia will be dark brown, and soffits will be painted cream color. The roof will be red colored asphalt shingles identical to the existing structure. Garage doors will be steel flush doors identical to existing flush door on other garages, painted brown. 12. Per code, eaves can encroach into setbacks up to 2 feet. The applicant has modified the building plans to be consistent with this regulation. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the variances required for the proposed accessory garage/site modification project with the conditions outlined below: This recommendation is based on the following findings of fact: 1. It is reasonable that the applicant seeks to continue to use the site for multi -family apartment use. 2. The use of the site for multi -family residential is in keeping with the land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. 4. Site layout and design is influenced by a number of factors, including the site size, the existing location of the apartment, Lake Minnetonka and Northern Road. 5. The proposal, post construction, will bring overall hardcover on the site to 40 percent which is consistent with current regulations. 6. The proposal, post construction, will meet the 30 percent green/open space and 40 percent maximum coverage requirements for driveways/parking/garages as required in the R-3 regulations. 7. Site drainage will be improved on the site. 8. Indoor and outdoor parking for the apartments is increased on the site as a result of the project. 9. The design and materials of the detached garages is similar to the existing apartments. -2359- Page 5 Staff recommends the following conditions be included in the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. A building permit will be required for the proposed garage construction project. 4. Impervious surface coverage shall be less than 40% of the site. Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process; also green/open space and driveway/parking areas/garage coverage requirements in the R-3 regulations will be verified and must meet the specific requirements. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit must be provided before release of any future building permit. 9. The lowest floor of the proposed garages shall meet the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation of 933.0 feet. 10. The new parking spaces shall be striped. -2360- Page 6 In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, It is anticipated that the variance application will be considered by the City Council at its October 11, 2016 meeting. -2361- Page 7 SH8NNT1d amn ''SHOA1AHnC UNY7 'SH7NNI'JN3 IIAM oNl 'saivioossv V OHMNOx x z 0 E"a w z z w x a Oiccaw.n a avc'iw apl �° suga —_._ ._ avl ,aP�.n •as aa,n5p aac , o ,amp 1p pa oG ', � ---- H U xw ►-� a z z; V1 °ate% F, a w ?W x'00 z W s/�/� �w_z � CO - .4 �> o E. >z Z.z ipy Ou U P-1 A P. 04 a a z .4w x too O �\\ N W u./ E d oa a z \ r n °9' / _ m d E- 12: a ;i a q Nryo� H-' o P 2362- a ; r is a;tnao >f ka 10 pN tiYY<9 _si oo `Y -o n - \ « S� ��a rva' ''gip _•_ :� b9 °ro^ - - g of 1. IXF 51, ut § d o P 2362- sx,,v�e , xn xaoiw.�ans oxr� ';aaxxioxa 1�� ONi 'S�LVIOOSSV N O2MNO o _1 si ettOL rn ,•os aaoso y � .! . i z �z> W ,4 � W O �• Ey Ol 9 ��i �; '" � I ;� W p-E- H 9F. zC O ti mz u M �J Odx "5q "50 0 W — co -2363- «y 9SCSS IdY '3MY'1 �NOI 3ANq Mp1LM N1NON S„ AI�.1 [NNY'Id pNY'J WNOA$AN(,C pNM 'CN9lIWONI 1IAlp 01-5 � [I 'S3 LVI70SSd �P 'J2I3HNOZI'J w, °w••^m a i°o W " i°% oil I - tills / '` I til oil T n z\\1loto / A R Iyl h a h / \\\ vel .z OF+4 uJ(1:E � „`g°� veno ♦\♦ %� I I i I I .sm Am �.$Nun �SgY En °L ♦\\\ b #��l�.�i oz 1( H 1 52 co pop Ohl, Sol M. At W21 MER hwalf U 21 YEN md W Q;o i :9 #�''� ° .= u,n n° .a - ♦\ \\ '\ a = "> Y cr= r \ I TE} ]Q�iS'i uoaC�"'°' o€i« F C k k E cPa° >° \♦ a 0 t0 Mule INd i o yYPY ♦♦ / . o Fi /"-�°o'`'� o"you N r�c ou uv o v v a ll u m IM 2364------- H a O x H W �K oil I - tills / '` I til oil T n z\\1loto / A R Iyl h a h / \\\ vel .z OF+4 uJ(1:E � „`g°� veno ♦\♦ %� I I i I I .sm Am �.$Nun �SgY En °L ♦\\\ b #��l�.�i oz 1( H 1 52 co pop Ohl, Sol M. At W21 MER hwalf U 21 YEN md W Q;o i :9 #�''� ° .= u,n n° .a - ♦\ \\ '\ a = "> Y cr= r \ I TE} ]Q�iS'i uoaC�"'°' o€i« F C k k E cPa° >° \♦ a 0 t0 Mule INd i o yYPY ♦♦ / . o Fi /"-�°o'`'� o"you N r�c ou uv o v v a ll u m IM 2364------- H a O x H I I I -2365- I C� ki -2366- IT Executive Summary [ilia [HIM TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM. Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Consulting City Planners ATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 17-28 Variance for 2039 Arbor Lane (PID No. 13-117-24-41-0003) IN"P j*+1W1 iiiIji/_1Z1 The applicant/property owner, John Range, has submitted an application for a variance for side yard setback variance to allow the construction of a second floor addition/expansion over the existing, attached garage. The existing lot of record, totaling 8,643 square feet, is a Lakeshore lot located on the southeast shore of Harrison's Bay. According to Hennepin County data, the current home was built in 1972. The narrow width of the lot limits the areas where the existing structure could be improved or expanded. The current orientation of the home to the side lot line is not exactly parallel, so while the existing structure is 6.0 feet from the side lot line, an addition which follows the side of the house requires a variance into the side yard setback, for a setback of 5.8 feet. The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their August 15, 2017 meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. Staff confirmed for the Planning Commission that the proposed building height meets zoning requirements. The applicant clarified that the portion of the second floor addition that will be within the setback area will be an overhang with supports; the first floor will not be expanded. To maintain the hardcover at the existing, non -conforming 44.1%, the applicant stated that existing hardcover will either be removed from part of the driveway or replacing the back patio with pervious pavers to help with drainage on the site. The change to hardcover will be determined by permitting and approvals. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff. NOTIFICATION Neighbors were provided written notification on August 16, 2017 that the variance request was being included on the August 22, 2017 City Council Meeting consent agenda. RECOMMENDATION Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. -2367- A WHEREAS, the applicant and property owner, John Range, submitted a request for a variance to allow construction of a second floor addition to the existing home at 2039 Arbor Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R1 -A single-family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 8,643 square foot property includes a home that was constructed in 1972; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to construct a second story addition to the house that extend into the west side yard setback; and WHEREAS, the property is narrow and there is limited area for a conforming expansion given that the existing home is built nearly to the setbacks on all sides; and WHEREAS, the line of the house and the line of the side lot line are not exactly parallel, so an expansion of the house towards the front of the lot begins to encroach on the side yard; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. me WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the August 15, 2017 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 15, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the variance as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its August 22, 2017, meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and -2369- WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The orientation of the existing home does not align exactly with the angle of the side yard lines. This results in the proposed upper floor expansion over the garage to extend 0.2 feet closer to the side lot line even though the expansion will align with the current home foundation, creating a 5.8 foot side yard setback. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve a variance for the property at 2039 Arbor Lane to allow the second floor addition to be located 5.8 feet from the side lot line, at its closest point, as described in Exhibit A, with the following conditions: 1. Impervious surface coverage shall not exceed the existing, non- conforming hard cover amount of 3,814 square feet (44.1 %). Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. -2370- 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd of August, 2017. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -2371- MINUTE EXCERPTS i mm -mi AUGUST 15, 2017 1 Vice Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Vice Chair David Goode; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Pelka, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Cindy Penner, Jameson Smieja, Jennifer Peterson, and Jake Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planners Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Field Officer Stewart Simon, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193rd St W, Farmington; Joseph & Marjana Schwebel, 15 Orme La, St. Paul; Brian Blake, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Barb Fritsch, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Jim Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Johnny Range, 2039 Arbor La; Jeremy Nelson, 2060 Waterside La; KC Nelson, 6500 Phoenix, Golden Valley; Tom McDonnell, 5239 Washburn Ave S, Mpls; Michelle Olson, 2060 Waterside La PLANNING CASE NO. 17-28 2039 ARBOR •WNER: JOHN RANGE VARIANCE — HOUSE REMODEL/ADDITION PROJECT Laura Chamberlain reviewed the application as follows: • Lakefront property, existing lot of record, 8,643 SF, zoned RIA, built in 1972 • Variance from sideyard setback for an addition off the front of the current home, extending over the garage ® Orientation of the home slightly askew to the side lot line • Existing home is 6 feet from side yard; new addition will be 5.8 feet at closest point • Existing hardcover is 44.1% and shall be maintained • Staff recommends approval Bussey asked if it was only the second level that encroaches. The applicant clarified that the proposed addition will extend over the front walkway to the house on pillars. The first level support pillars as well as the second floor will encroach into the setback area. Bussey asked about the height requirements. Chamberlain indicated that the proposed structure is conforming. -2372- Planning Commission Minutes 2 August 15, 2017 Velsor asked the applicant about the plan for the hardcover. John Range, 2039 Arbor Lane, stated that the preferred plan is to change some hardcover into permeable pavers. However, that would not be able to be completed until after the addition was completed. If the hardcover reduction needs to be addressed sooner, then they would remove a portion of the driveway. MOTION by Bussey, second by Velsor, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff subject to conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-3. MOTION carried unanimously. -2373- ri DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: BACKGROUND Planning Commission Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Planning Consultants Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 8, 2017 17-28 Variance John Range (Owner) 2039 Arbor Lane (PID 13-117-24-41-0003) August 15, 2017 Low Density Residential RI -A Single Family Residential The applicant/property owner, John Range, has submitted an application for a variance for side yard setback variance to allow the construction of a second floor addition/expansion over the existing, attached garage. The existing lot of record, totaling 8,643 square feet, is a lakeshore lot located on the southeast share of Harrison's Bay. According to Hennepin County data, the current home was built in 1972. REVIEW PROCEDURE Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. -2374- (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule. The "Day 1" was determined to be July 25, 2017, for the application. r � • Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a letter on August 9, 2017 to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the application at its August 15, 2017 meeting. The orientation of the existing home is slightly askew when compared to the side lot line. The existing home is 6.0 feet from the side yard, but in order for the new addition over the garage to be built at a straight line, a variance of 0.2 feet into the side yard setback is requested. This will result in a new side setback of 5.8 feet. -2375- STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved City Departments and affected public agencies for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and, are therefore, not included in this report. Eric Hoversten, City Manager -Director of Public Works. No issues with this application. If the house were square/parallel to the lot line, extension of the side elevation to the front of the garage for the addition would conform by .2 feet. Vickie Schleuning, LMCD Executive Director No issues with this application. Chase Vanderbilt, MCWD MCWD staff received an inquiry from John Range about the proposed work at 2039 Arbor Lane, Mound. It was decided that no MCWD permits would be needed for the proposed work. ® The narrow width of the lot limits the areas where the existing structure could be improved or expanded. The current orientation of the home to the side lot line is not exactly parallel, so while the existing structure is 6.0 feet from the side lot line, an addition which follows the side of the house requires a variance of 0.2 feet from the side yard setback. ® The existing hardcover on the property is 3,814 square feet or 44.1% of the lot area. This exceeds the 40% hardcover limit for a lot of record. As this is a preexisting condition, the non -conforming amount of hardcover will be allowed to continue. However, the applicant requested in their application an additional 153 square feet of hardcover for this project, bringing the total to 45.9%. In subsequent conversations with the applicant, they have agreed to reduce the total hardcover elsewhere on site so that it does not exceed the existing condition of 3,814 square feet. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the variance for this site subject to the following conditions: Impervious surface coverage shall not exceed the existing, non -conforming hard cover amount of 3,814 square feet (44.1%). Hardcover calculations will be verified as part of building permit process. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -2376- 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 2011, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others rules went into effect and are under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval of the variance, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The orientation of the existing home does not align exactly with the angle of the side yard lines. This results in the proposed upper floor expansion over the garage to extend 0.2 feet closer to the side lot line even though the expansion will align with the current home foundation. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded -2377- to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the possible meeting date is August 22, 2017. -2378- 0- nAA& T"_6'MouUP_ 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 VARIANCE APPLICATION41 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. City Council Date Plavica tuna nr nrinf lanikilis SUBJECT Address 0"�', Avbo-.-- Lot I/ 61'tc� -*� 4f"A e-e5feL /0 C—'f Block PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. Subdivision.., 6i&A PID # Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 131 B2 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name Email 3 OWNER Address— At Al 7 Phone Home 6/2 03 0C i Work Fax I APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax nazi C11 I C1PPm;duui i uvut uuen rnaue tor zoning, variance, conamonai use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes No If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): P, Kt� S -&u !Zk q�4�' ��' v' " q -4- '0 "P— a , f ee-V ce—ni //�' Variance Information (1/10/2017) Page 4 of 6 -2379- Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No . If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area; etc.): / 1 70 SETBACKS: Front Yard: (N S E W) ft. Side Yard: ( N SE W ) ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. (NSEW) ft. Street Frontage: ft. Lot Size: sq ft Hardcover: sq ft REQUESTED (or existing) MIN ft. ft. sq ft sq ft VARIANCE ft. 4. Does the present se of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes , No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? "too narrow ( ) topography () soil ( ) too small ( ) drainage () existing situation { ) too shallow ( ) shape () other: specify Please describe: " f Variance Information (1/10/2017) Page 5 of 6 -2380- Case No. 11 11 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No,`%K. If yes, explain: 7. Was the practica difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes( ),No K If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes , No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: 001 rcve - s tC� fl beep �r( TC I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicant's Signati Variance Information (1/10/2017) Page 6 of 6 -2381- Date 07..21-&j Date 67-9/_ e f (��o�ap �anoop/Dy) Lt-6Z—L. _.-.- suoisinay Eno .Tg UMOJo bmp•abuDj :awDN bgimDlo LIli F/L :-4-c fanjnS 77 :a6Dd/Moog LLbg aagwnN qop 00Lti1 'ON uopouasibad — LJ—r----- ;a o 'o;osauul{yOJ0400;s eq, Jo smal ay; /apun .rofan/nS puD7 pa/aasibaa .Gnp o wo / soya puD ucismuadns paaip xw uapun Jo Ow Xq pajodajd soM XaAJns fO a;ooypjao siy; aoq; .fjpsaa Ifgauay I sZ£6B MY 'ouD/ao woopuD7blogoyoS-mmm 35 £! 'PPI 'off L668(ZZ£—ZL6—£9L ,O/p\// I 89DIA&39 a V7 D&oeoHOS CO ti 0 0 Q � C C C vj b` �a2 V,b°.3•�w 0 C U q N O J Q a ®oma x % 1\h 4) m ()%K n Q� 'o l •. � a tK .. '. t `:.:,;'i,�.>.': ;•.', ':, aai IIIc 9,��Og ra / � _ �r• ' .ate; .fie .e I 1 m ti `itK�y1>5 93 N6 `gyp J5 t e CO •1 U ^° s'r y5ti' 3 VDl- I � romrn`"� � rn tir R b V 44�h MN �Ki m D` ti ` Q O O N rlsj k 2N N N C b u m' fid, e� �\I Gds ♦/ a ba aOOS j j off u 'oac 'D o UOQ bQ3°$ '� �.c o� ro• � c �•E o .'cZ ob gab -2382-ayo=y TW 4U Utt1�o o � CO uj crzM o i uj �$ Oct A,R Q fie � �5E re i e5 ? 9tlei:a sia�f 6 as g3 €Bia EmOHsy4z VMiSJXa ?3snoH w asnoH Q 9NI1SIX3 $ i 9NIlSIX3 o9a .0 9£ 9 +8 i -- ----- U S Q gae 046 wd�6r t .E s "1 0 zwzw N � wO `n0 W I Z N O v X z` ,O,9E —2383— lllalq a LIM a lung rill. c,Zv3 Cf Art 011 L+� MAY -22 2012 Co-- Y03-0010 An R 'UILDING HEIGHT 1 • ! !;! - 1� highestPer Mound City Code, building height and building line are defined as follows: IMMMUM une ota mansard roof, to a point on the roof directly above the of •. roof,/ the uppermostpoint on • • or other arch type roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or ,• roof. Subd. 15. Buildin Line. A line parallel to the street right-of-way or the ordinary high water level—at any story level of a building and representing the minimum• - • •. • a • • - •.« • said right-of-way line or ordinary high water level. Describe the type of •• - proposed: / pitched, flat, shed roof, 2.- Provide the average grade elevation of the building, line facing the street. c/ __U_7 -based on proposed grades referenced on submitted average3. Provide the grade elevation of building lake.M j based on proposed grades referenced on submitted average4. Provide the grade elevation of building t height5. Provide the of - proposed ♦+ - as measured from the lowest grade elevation to highest point of structure. ?/ Pt a V01101-1 6. The applicant (or designated representative) must provide written and graphic information to confirm that the proposed height of the new structure, based on the Zoning Ordinance definition, meets the height regulations of 2 Y2stories or thirty-five - (35) feet. Please note that the graphic documented must be scaled to allow for • •; Samples attached. Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Consulting City Planners DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 17-29 Variance for 3231 Gladstone Lane (PID No. 25-117-24-21-0117) w HK 3i The applicant, Jayme Quinnell, on behalf of property owner Joseph Schwebel, has submitted an application for a variance for the lake yard setback to allow for the construction of a covered deck to replace and expand the footprint of the existing deck. The existing lot of record, totaling 12,259 square feet, is a lakeshore lot located on the southwest side of the island. According to Hennepin County data, the current home was built in 1962. A review of Hennepin County topographic data and Staff site visit indicate that there is likely a disturbed bluff on the site, with the existing structure and retaining walls within the top -of -bluff setback. As a result, a variance for construction within the top of the bluff setback is also required. The existing lot of record is a long, narrow lot which is only 50 feet in width and more than 200 feet in length. The lakeshore intersects the rear of the home at an angle, resulting in the north side lot line to be 260 feet in length, while the south side lot line is only 222 feet. While the home is constructed generally parallel to the street, it is not parallel with the lakeshore. This results in portions of both the existing and proposed decks to be within the required lakeshore setback area and portions outside of the required setback. The existing deck has a lakeshore setback of 47 feet; the proposed deck has a lakeshore setback of 44.4 feet. The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their August 15, 2017 meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. Staff clarified that the required setback from the top -of -bluff is 10 feet and the existing and proposed deck are within the 10 foot setback. The applicant clarified that the covered portion of the deck is square with the house, while the deck has a slightly rounded edge that will be uncovered. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff. 111010,061At e , Neighbors were provided written notification on August 16, 2017 that the variance request was being included on the August 22, 2017 City Council Meeting consent agenda. RECOMMENDATION Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORYPLANNING COMMISS101 • II Vice Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Vice Chair David Goode; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Pelka, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Cindy Penner, Jameson Smieja, Jennifer Peterson, and Jake Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planners Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Field Officer Stewart Simon, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193rd St W, Farmington; Joseph & Marjana Schwebel, 15 Orme La, St. Paul; Brian Blake, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Barb Fritsch, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Jim Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Johnny Range, 2039 Arbor La; Jeremy Nelson, 2060 Waterside La; KC Nelson, 6500 Phoenix, Golden Valley; Tom McDonnell, 5239 Washburn Ave S, Mpls; Michelle Olson, 2060 Waterside La PLANNING CASE NO. 3231 GLADSTONE LANE VARIANCE — DECK REPLACEMENT / ADDITION OWNER: JOE SCHWEBEL Laura Chamberlain reviewed the application as follows: • Deck setback into the 50' Lakeshore setback • Zoned R01, existing lot of record, 12,259 sf, built in 1962 • Deck on lakeside to replace existing which encroaches 2.6 feet into the 50 foot setback; new deck encroaches 5.6 feet • As this is a covered deck it counts toward hardcover; proposed 33.3% is within maximum for a lot of record • Narrow lot with angle of lakeshore in relation to side lot lines • Determined that bluff on property that has been disturbed; 10 foot setback from top of bluff required but likely house and deck already constructed within bluff area Bluff variance required to allow for project. Bussey asked if there was a difference between bluff setback and Lakeshore setback. Chamberlain explained the difference. Goode asked about property owner comments. Smith said abutting property owners were notified of the variance request and she was contacted with questions about the project. Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2017 Bussey wanted to know if the entire deck was covered. Chamberlain said that the portion that is covered is already calculated into the hardcover. Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193`a St w Farmington, said that the roof goes out to the corner of the deck. The radius corner of the deck sticks out beyond the roof. MOTION by Baker, second by Velsor, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-6. MOTION carried unanimously. -2390- _#RM7 II U wer,i, LOX�1' WHEREAS, the applicant, Jayme Quinnell, on behalf of property owner, Joseph Schwebel, submitted a request for a variance to allow the replacement and extension of a lakeside deck to the existing home at 3231 Gladstone Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-1 single-family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 12,259 square foot property includes a home that was constructed in 1972; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to reconstruct a lakeside deck which will extend further into the lakeside setback than the existing deck; and WHEREAS, the property has significant changes in topography, limiting the use of the backyard for recreation; and WHEREAS, the existing home, deck, and retaining walls have disturbed the natural bluff and sit within the top of bluff setback; and WHEREAS, the existing home is constructed generally parallel to the street, which is not parallel with the lakeshore; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. -2391- (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the August 15, 2017 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 15, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the variance as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its August 22, 2017, meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and -2392- WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The lakeshore at this existing lot of record extends at an angle through the rear of the property. While the home is oriented to the front and side lot lines, the angle of the lakeshore ordinary high water line results in differing lakeshore setbacks along the rear of the home. This limits the available area for a conforming rear deck. 4. As a lakeshore lot, it is reasonable that the applicant would seek to place a deck on the rear of the home overlooking the lakeshore rather than on the front where there is available space. The narrowness of the lot prevents the construction of a deck along the side of the home. 5. The bluff, which has been previously disturbed by the construction of the home, retaining walls, and stairs, limits the ability of the property owners to enjoy their backyard other than through the construction of a deck. 6. The proposed deck does not extend fully into the available lakeshore setback area on the north so while the proposed deck does extend further into the setback area than the existing deck, the applicant has tried to minimize the variance requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve a variance for the property at 3132 Gladstone Lane to allow construction of a deck into the lakeshore setback area and the top of bluff setback, as described in Exhibit A, with the following conditions: Applicant shall maintain hardcover under the 40% allowance. This will be verified with the building permit application. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. -2393- 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd of August, 2017. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -2394- ri Planning Commission Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Planning Consultants Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 8, 2017 17-29 Variance Jayme Quinnell 3231 Gladstone Lane (PID 25-117-24-21-0117) August 15, 2017 Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Jayme Quinnell, on behalf of the property owner, Joseph Schwebel, has submitted an application for a variance for the construction of a covered deck to replace the existing deck on the lakeside of the house at 3231 Gladstone Lane. The existing lot of record, totaling 12,259 square feet, is a lakeshore lot located on the southwest edge of the island. According to Hennepin County data, the current home was built in 1962. A review of Hennepin County topographic data and Staff site visit indicate that there is likely a disturbed bluff on the site. REVIEW PROCEDURE Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or -2395- buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule. The "Day 1" was determined to be July 25, 2017, for the application. Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a letter on August 9, 2017 to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the application at its August 15, 2017 meeting. SITE INFORMATION The existing lot of record is a long, narrow lot which is only 50 feet in width and more than 200 feet in length. The lakeshore intersects the rear of the home at an angle, resulting in the north side lot line to be 260 feet in length, while the south side lot line is only 222 feet. While the home is constructed generally parallel to the street, it is not parallel with the lakeshore. This results in portions of both the existing and proposed decks to be within the required lakeshore -2396- setback area and portions outside of the required setback. The existing deck, which is only 9.6 in depth, extends about 2.6 feet into the Lakeshore setback area. The new deck, which will be about 12 feet in depth at the corners and 14 feet at the center, will extend 5.6 feet in the required lakeshore setback area. STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved City Departments and affected public agencies for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and, are therefore, not included in this report. See additional comments which are summarized below: Vickie Schleuning, LMCD Executive Director No issues with this application. Chase Vanderbilt, MCWD From a preliminary review, the proposed deck addition at 3231 Gladstone Lane in the City of Mound will most likely not need any MCWD permits. The only potential permit needed would be an Erosion Control permit, which is required from the District for land disturbance of 5,000 sf and/or 50 cy of excavation/fill. DISCUSSION ® The narrow width of the lot with the extreme angle of the Lakeshore make it difficult to expand the existing deck without further encroaching into the Lakeshore setback. The applicant is proposing to cover the deck. Based on past practice, City Staff believes deck setback requirements are applicable rather than structure setback requirements. With a side yard setback of 5.4 feet, the proposed deck is conforming as deck side yard setbacks in rear yards on a lakeshore lot are 4 feet. ® A review of Hennepin County topographic data and Staff site visit indicate that the property is a bluff. The bluff has already been disturbed through the construction of retaining walls and a staircase. Shoreland regulations require a 10 foot setback from the top of the bluff for structures. A variance from this requirement is being requested as the location of the home on the site prevents an alternative location. The construction of a deck will likely have less impact than a structure given that only footings are required rather than a foundation. While a covered deck is treated similar to an uncovered deck in regards to setback requirements, a covered deck does have to be included in hardcover calculations. The deck will add 72 square feet of hardcover to the existing property. The total hardcover proposed after the proposed deck will be 4,086 square feet or 33.3%. This is less than the 40% maximum hardcover for a lot of record. -2397- � • lid' � i Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the variance for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall maintain hardcover under the 40% allowance. This will be verified with the building permit application. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 2011, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others rules went into effect and are under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval of the variance, the following findings of fact are offered: The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. -2398- 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The lakeshore at this existing lot of record extends at an angle through the rear of the property. While the home is oriented to the front and side lot lines, the angle of the lakeshore ordinary high water line results in differing lakeshore setbacks along the rear of the home. This limits the available area for a conforming rear deck. 4. As a Lakeshore lot, it is reasonable that the applicant would seek to place a deck on the rear of the home overlooking the Lakeshore rather than on the front where there is available space. The narrowness of the lot prevents the construction of a deck along the side of the home. 5. The bluff, which has been previously disturbed by the construction of the home, retaining walls, and stairs, limits the ability of the property owners to enjoy their backyard other than through the construction of the deck. 6. The proposed deck does not extend fully into the available lakeshore setback area on the north so while the proposed deck does extend further into the setback area than the existing deck, the applicant has tried to minimize the variance requested. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the possible meeting date is August 22, 2017. -2399- An VARIANCE 2415 Wfsh)re Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 APPLICATION Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time Of application, Planning Commission Date Case No.-) A N zn2 City Council Date Please type or Print legibly SUBJECT Address 323 i PROPERTY LEGAL Lot Block DESC. Subdivision \j\,J4-A kk. y rr ----------- PI D # 2 -7 Zoning: RI RIA R2 P3 BI 132 B3 {Circle one) PROPERTY Name. ZL2� OWNER Address— k Phone Home tkgl - fo !LL2,54-2work. Fax- APPLICANT Name k:+..�+r.Email I t'A,- (IF OTHER 17�_ THAN Address -S;7*a '7 0 92`4- SET- - k4.-. OWNER) Phone Home `;9-G 2*41E-!�-tWorkb--"--Z--35--tt 00 Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance,. conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes( )No(y). if -yes, list date(s)W application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailq description of proposed construction..or alteration {size, number of stories, type of use, etc.), Variance Information (1110/2017) Page 4 of 6 -2400- Case No, 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (,�, If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc,): SETBACKS; REQUIRED Front Yard: N 86%) Side Yard: &EW) ft. Side Yard: "� W) ft. Rear Yard: N S E ft. Lakeside: N S E�p'c1 ft. (NSEW) Street Frontage: REQUESTED (or existing} '2 ft, ft. VARIANCE ft. ft. -ft, ft, Lot Size: -L' 7_� I sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: .sq ft j -,C 16 _sq ft _sq it -33.'3/ 4, Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No (>O- - If no, specify each non -conforming use; "A 6 5. Which unique physical: characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? )1oo narrow ( )topography soil ) too small ( ) drainage existing situation )too shallow ( )shape other. specify Please describe: Variance Information 'V10/2017) Page 5 of 6 -2401- CaSe No. 6- Was the Practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having Property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No PI, if yes. explain: - - -------------------- 7- Was the Practical difficulty created by any other humapi-made change. such as the T-efocatlon of a road? Yes( ),No(K). Ifyes, explain: Are the conditionsof prae. described:in =1 diff-icalty f0j, W.jieh- you this P ""E�gu'5s 'Ia varianCe Pecutiar only to the property et't'C'11? Yes 00, No If no, list SOM6 Other properties ..wh c . k h -are similarly a ffected certify that all of the above stPtements-:qndjhje,,$t,- WOMent$ contained: in a are fnje.wd��rate_ I nY plans 10 be aartrw4edge Ituo have read albof the vgtianae inforalafion provided. I consent to the enty. !nor- upon the pmllriisds4escribed in this applic official Of the PY of Mound far= the Purpose of 11UPecting, or of pot cation by any authorized notices as In aY be require&4 law. ting, m9irltali'litlig and removing such Ownees Applicaril Variance Informalion OJM2017) Page 6 of 6 -2402- Date02 2-6, �- � 1- Date - 7 /to � o u v P s z m �Nf7 cu = 0 o z N�ua�.v yy yNN N�iyv yyW O DANN9D , E� m � troj�o v v v u v 2 �Nf7 cu E� v troj�o 05 S m K z� N O0o O- v -o � z — mM tli . M z A 0 a ; `" — a 0 w �Gl opsP �AN -2gp- lop - HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS wawp-- (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: OWNER'S NAME: LOT AREA I SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) ........... .......................... LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. lb =--z- * Existing Lot,-; of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see back). A.plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE X '30•'2— X TOTAL HOUSE.... ................. _ ............ ...... —7 :3 DETACHED BUILDINGS X —1 is (GARAGE/SHED) --2+q-7 X TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................ t'+ 14- 7 DRIVEWAY, PARKING X AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. to X TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ... ..................... ........ DECKS Open decks (1W min. X Opening behveen boards) with a pervious surface under are not X counted as hardcover. X TOTALDECK.......................................... .... X X TOTAL OTHER ................... ....................... — 3 K � TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERWOUS SURFACE ...................... -- ........................ UNDER I OVER (indicate difference) ..... ......... -- ................................ ....... PREPARED By DATE /1 7— Revised 01112110 -24g4- 0 - of X 0- -n -n O R57'_3` O O -0 O DECKING DIRECTION 2° I 12' Q JOE & MARYANN SCHWEBEL > COVERED DECK v m 3231 Gt-2405-'NE LN MOUND, -AR -55364 m m m D Z a Z n `^ n N rn N N m ul co ND y=+o N n CCt�i, O Dern m 2-0 Z M n m E 3: mrn = DN D m W O 3�0 �� m D Z 3 d NO C rn -o m X -+Z m O = D > U -V '9 o0 Z D T c (n fn C Z7 m O O -" ;v D n m c O QO O DECKING DIRECTION 2° I 12' Q JOE & MARYANN SCHWEBEL > COVERED DECK v m 3231 Gt-2405-'NE LN MOUND, -AR -55364 m m m D Z a Z n `^ n N rn N N 0 c / m JOE MOUND, f !« : <t ':2 -©' il COVERED $..3231 Iy \<\ ■, . :-2407- Executive Summary TO: Mound City Council and Staff FROM: Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Consulting City Planners DATE: August 22, 2017 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 17-21 & 17-22 Variance and Expansion Permit for 2060 Waterside Lane (PID No. 13-117-24-23- 0041) The applicant/property owner, Michelle Olson, has submitted an application for a variance and an expansion permit for an addition on her property at 2060 Waterside Lane. The 18,815 square foot lot of record contains a single-family home and a shed. It is located at the corner of Waterside Lane and Spruce Road. As the house is located across Waterside Lane from Harrisons Bay it is not considered a lakeshore property. The applicant is proposing the construction of a second story over the existing home and garage, the addition of second floor decks to the front, first and second story decks on the side of the house, and a two-story addition at the rear of the home. An expansion permit is needed for the following non -conforming setbacks to be expanded to a second story: - Front deck setback of 21.6 feet (30 feet required) - Rear corner setback of 13.1 feet (15 feet required) - Street side yard setback of 23.9 feet for the second story of the house (30 feet required) A variance is needed for the first and second story deck on the side of the house. This deck follows the line of the house, but because the house and the lot line are not exactly parallel, it actually encroaches further than the existing condition of a 23.9 foot setback. The proposed variance is for a 23.3 foot setback for the deck. The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their August 15, 2017 meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. The applicant clarified that the posts on the deck shown on the plans are existing and would also be expanded up to the second floor. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the variance and expansion permit with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff. Neighbors were provided written notification on August 16, 2017 that the variance request was being included on the August 22, 2017 City Council Meeting consent agenda. RECOMMENDATION Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. WHEREAS, the applicant and property owner, Michelle Olson, submitted a request for an expansion permit and a variance to allow the construction of multiple improvements to the existing home at 2060 Waterside Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R1 -A single-family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 18,815 square foot property includes a home that was constructed in 1954; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a variance to allow a street side yard deck setback of 23.3 feet for the proposed first and second story deck addition on the side of the house facing Spruce Street; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an expansion permit to allow the proposed second story addition to follow the same 21.6 foot front yard setback for the decks, the 13.1 foot rear corner setback, and the 23.9 foot Spruce Road setback as the first story; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan, ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. EMS WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting an expansion permit which is provided below: (1) The proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. Function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. Absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. Adequacy of off-street parking. (2) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. -2411- (4) The expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) The expansion requested is the minimum needed. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the August 15, 2017 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 15, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the variance as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its August 22, 2017, meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The orientation of the existing home does not align exactly with the angle of the side yard lines. This results in the proposed extension of the house line to build a deck encroaches further into the side yard setback from Spruce Street. -2412- WHEREAS, in granting approval of the expansion permit, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The desire for a second floor addition with decks is reasonable for a residential property. 4. The deck front yard encroachment of 8.4 feet into the front yard setback is an existing condition that is not being increased as a result of the proposed addition. 5. The rear yard setback of 13.1 feet is an existing condition that will be maintained as the second story is added. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the variance and expansion permit for the property at 2060 Waterside Lane, as described in Exhibit A, with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall maintain hardcover under the 40% allowance. This will be verified with the building permit application. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. -2413- 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd of August, 2017. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -2414- MINUTE EXCERPTS P , MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION Vice Chair Goode called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Vice Chair David Goode; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Pelka, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Cindy Penner, Jameson Smieja, Jennifer Peterson, and lake Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planners Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Field Officer Stewart Simon, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Jayme Quinnell, 5378 193`d St W, Farmington; Joseph & Marjana Schwebel, 15 Orme La, St. Paul; Brian Blake, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Barb Fritsch, 101 Peavey La, Wayzata; Jim Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Johnny Range, 2039 Arbor La; Jeremy Nelson, 2060 Waterside La; KC Nelson, 6500 Phoenix, Golden Valley; Tom McDonnell, 5239 Washburn Ave S, Mpls; Michelle Olson, 2060 Waterside La PLANNING CASE NOS. 17-21 (EXPANSION) AND 17-22 (VARIANCE) 2060 WATERSIDE LANE APPLICANT: MICHELLE OLSON Rita Trapp reviewed the application as follows: • Existing lot of record; 18,815 square foot lot on corner of Waterside and Spruce • Waterside Lane is between the house and the lake , so subject property is not Lakeshore lot • Proposing construction of a second level over the house and garage; decks on the front and side; and, two, two-story additions on the rear of the home • Located in the R -1A zoning district; existing lot of record built in 1954 • Expansion permit is required for the second floor addition for the front yard setback, north rear corner, and Spruce side yard setback • Variance approval for the non -conforming Spruce Road setback due to construction of the proposed two-story deck on the side of the home • Staff recommends approval with conditions and findings of fact Velsor asked if the columns are going to encroach closer to Spruce and Waterside than the existing. Trapp deferred to the applicant. -2415- Planning Commission Minutes August 15, 2017 Bussey confirmed that the expansion is expanding upward on the existing non-conformance for the expansion permit and the variance is for side deck. Trapp agreed. Bussey asked if the setback requirements include stairs. Trapp stated that stairs have separate requirements. Jeremy Nelson (2100 Mary Hills Dr, Golden Valley) responded that the columns are existing; the footings are large enough to support the two-story deck. They will be extended upward. MOTION by Baker, second by Bussey, to recommend approval of the expansion permit as recommended by staff with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-5. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Baker, second by Bussey, to recommend approval of the variance as recommended by staff with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-3 noting that the requested setback was 23.3 feet. MOTION carried unanimously. -2416- Planning Commission Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Planning Consultants Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 8, 2017 17-21 (Expansion Permit), 17-22 (Variance) Expansion Permit and Variance Michelle Olson (Owner) 2060 Waterside Lane (PID 13-117-24-23-0041) August 15, 2017 Low Density Residential R -1A Single Family Residential The applicant/property owner, Michelle Olson, has submitted an application for a variance and an expansion permit for a second -floor house addition on her property at 2060 Waterside Lane. The 18,815 square foot lot of record contains a single-family home and a shed. It is located at the corner of Waterside Lane and Spruce Road. As the house is located across Waterside Lane from Harrisons Bay, it is not considered a lakeshore property. The applicant is proposing the construction of a second story over the existing home and garage, the addition of decks to the front and side of the house on the second floor, and a two-story addition at the rear of the home. KEHL'117,�KITLEJTJUKE Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or -2417- buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Expansion Permit City Code Section 129-40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be granted to provide relief to the landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulties. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the City Council shall evaluate the following criteria: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c, adequacy of off-street parking. (2) exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. Abutting property owners per Hennepin County tax records, were sent written notice on August 9, 2017 to inform them of the variance and expansion permit requests and that the applications are being included on the August 15, 2017 Planning Commission meeting agenda for review. 9; '' • Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be August 8, 2017. PINVUO-1193KOM The 18,815 square foot property has an existing, one-story home that was constructed in 1954. The applicant is proposing to add a second level; add decks on the front and rear; and add two, two-story additions on the rear of the home. As shown on the attached survey, the existing home's deck has a front yard setback from Waterside Lane of 21.6 feet, which is 8.4 feet less than the required front yard setback of 30 feet for the R-1 District. An expansion permit is needed to allow for the continuation of this front yard setback for the second story. An expansion permit is also required for the north rear corner of the house, which sits 13.1 feet from the lot line. An expansion permit is required to expand this non -conformity with a second floor addition at the same setback. A variance is also required to address the non -conforming Spruce Road setback. As a corner lot with 120 feet in width, a 30 foot setback from Spruce Road is required for the home. The existing home is located only 23.9 feet from the street, making it a non -conformity. However, a variance is needed to allow the proposed two-story deck that has a setback of 23.3 feet from the street at the southwest corner because of the orientation of the house to the street is not exactly perpendicular. -2419- STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and, are therefore, not included in this report. DISCUSSION • The lowest floor elevation of the existing home is 936.4 feet which is higher than the regulatory flood protection elevation for Lake Minnetonka at 933.0 feet. • A variance was approved in 2002 that allowed construction of a deck on the front of the home abutting Waterside Lane. • The proposed hardcover for the site is 4,944 square feet, approximately 26.3% of the lot area. As a lot of record, this is well within the 40% maximum. • Applicant is advised that code allows eaves to extend 2 feet into setbacks. Steps can be located 2 feet from setbacks. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approval of the variance and the expansion permits for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant must maintain hardcover under the 40% maximum allowed. This will be verified at the time of building permit. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 2011, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others rules went into effect and are under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval of the variance, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. The orientation of the existing home does not align exactly with the angle of the side yard lines. This results in the proposed extension of the house line to build a deck encroaches further into the side yard setback from Spruce Street. In recommending Staff approval of the expansion permit, the following findings of fact are offered: The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The desire for a second floor addition with decks is reasonable for a residential property. 4. The deck front yard encroachment of 8.4 feet into the front yard setback is an existing condition that is not being increased as a result of the proposed addition. 5. The rear yard setback of 13.1 feet is an existing condition that will be maintained as the second story is added. -2421- CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the possible meeting date is August 22, 2017. -2422- JUL 10 2017 EXPANSION PERMIT -----QZWaaW APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 553, Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Case No. SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. Please type or rint legibly- ACeSubdivisionz-L PID# Zoning(9 Name 2 ;;Te7&r7 -01�cl? Email A Ad Phone Horn APPLICANT Name (IF OTHER X, Block R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 B3 (Circle one) n d5017 Fax Email THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax I . Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes P'Oo ( ). If Yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and Provide cooies of resolutions. rV 2, Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): Expansion Permit Information (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 6 -2423- 23 Case No. 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. SETBACKS: REQUIRED RE ED EXPANSION g (C?� existing t oh Xe- �2(414 Front Yard: (NSEW) 3&-> ft. 3. �?;4kcde Yard: (NSEW) -30 ft.�9 ft. Sc �1/e Side Yard., ft. S E W) � tt fLs ft t) ;Z0 O, T34�-a_ Rear Yard: (NS EW) ft. 4VW Lakeside: (NSEW) ft, ft, ft : (NSEW) ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft Lot Size: sq ft -sq ft sq ft Hardcover., sq ft - sq ft _sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? YesA, No if no, specify each non -conformity: 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: too narrow ( )topography soil )too small ( )drainage (4existing situation too shallow ( )shape other: specify Please describe: 11 by-,, 4r2�_�� 7 ,4 /"9 64khk' Expansion Permit Information (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 6 WMMA Case No, 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No (. If yes, explain: 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (;>� If yes, explain: 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes 0_1 No ( ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature Signati Expansion Permit Information (1/14/2016) Page 6 of 6 -2425- Date (0 —,,,; � ? Date (," / 7 J U L 10 2017 VARIANCE APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952472-0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time Of application. Planning Commission Date Case No. City Council Date Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address 201,00)) PROPERTY LEGAL Lot- q9 Block— �2- DESC. Subdivision Ukke.,,iiAe-?(-,Ly-k—.A,,L, CY-a,kzr,--) PID # 11 -1 - 2-q - 2-3 - (XL41 zoning: q R1A R2 R3 81 B2 E33 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name Email OWNER Address Wfh"A Ide Phone Home 'IrLY APPLICANT Name IN-A' CA)eli ke- 3 ean I Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax I Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes X No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. a4% = n2 -- t,, 2--, 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): + Sfirf I r � u K, Variance Information (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 6 -2426- 5 Case No. 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning U 'Ist,-'at ;i i vihich it is located? Yes No K: if no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason k i I for variance request, i.e. 6athack, lot area, etc,): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing) Yard: N ft. W04r.�'LSide Yard, (NSEW) C) ft. ft, Side Yard: (NSEW) ft. ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. Lakeside: (NSEW) ft. ft. ft. (NSEW) ft, ft, Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft Lot Size: ---sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft -sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes, No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? )too narrow )too small )too shallow Please describe: J.e� V"cec't-1 Variance Information (1/94/2016) Page 5 of 6 ( )topography soil ( )drainage existing situation ( ) shape other: specify Case No. 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action ofan ne having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes (), No*elf yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes' No { ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Signature. Applicant's Signature, Variance Information (1/14/2016) Page 6 of 6 -2428- Date__/�`� Date HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTYADDESS: 'Z060 LAqf OWNER'S NAME: JEf-'E"'Iy- NFL S01'4 LOT AREA. SQ. FT. X 30'% = (for all lots) ........................................ I I LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. 1 7526 * Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SO FT HOUSE —X —X TOTAL HOUSE .................................................... 3073 DETACHED BUILDINGS X (GARAGE/SHED) X TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS............................... DRIVEWAY, PARKING X AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. X X TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ..... ......... ....... ................ -763 DECKS open decks (1/4' min. X Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X counted as hardcover. X TOTALDECK ....................................................... 9?q- X X 7 7 TOTAL OTHER ... - ................ ..... - ............ -- ....... 70 TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE .......... ......... ....... ...... .............. 4NLDE;OVER (indicate difference) ....................... ...................... .............. ...... 12 PREPARED BY DATE 7-7--17 Revised 1/10 -2429- a, t -V W 00. 00 -loo, % oo wo /lool lo, 100, Lo 101, /1 Lo Ile 10, tg 16 -2430-,\ -gcl+%D I- S16Z-199-Z19 49E59 Z ; Win m m - NW punow -ul appja4e m o9oz 0 u UOSIGN Awajor N 5 16� 8 5 5 T7 17 ij < lu fV w z w ttQyY 0 ;!: 0�8,u T 0 lwfa000 A m (OV twn LL n www -gcl+%D I- 35S6 e6 woaooyoA�p y�edsAc6uewwoa 1 3 � �' y Sl6Z-M-Z19 179ESS NW punoW < r �f n C p+j �4;f� �z�eg�_ c •ul apisia4eM D902 !j UOSION AU/a,!®(` a� rear w Mml 1111H c 1 3 ,i �- �I � o i }y , O'D ®®'❑ OIDDIO �. MOB,D,O O;OTO;DIFE FT� ll r 11I1JJ� i i j ;i • -Z4[d& \ \ 12433- § me \ #Eg NW pmw 9| [ ! Q (§ .)\]$� m mo! um�N Amea \ \ 12433- G �{ Fig- iNi woaoo4ol.�y.iods(rSww Z St6Z-L99-Zt9 g b9ESS NW punoW o F- a o c 'ul apisva4eM o9oZ a o I h -2434- -2434- HImaa oo4c.(�suodzAn6wwuwa 3 s3u SL6Z-L99-ZL9 R 0 0 o ° f� =s4r c b9£SS NW punoW 'Lil apisaa4eM o9oZ oo a g w 4 �' Q iia=aaEs �( uos�a� wajar a" a<t Ws,o`€€ 0033 o00 � I l U '0 O 4 O N h ry __,.. o � I N - Get -6l LL, c .. m r i Y _.._44-.91. .Z �.t.r .- �ep � r M1 .I-1 -2435- �a�Q l wo> aoVOA�st�eds.G5wwwoo � , ��€€ ! 3n: i=ez �r St6Z-L98-Zt9 44£55 NW punoW a oa 0 e LL d �d > f) €has € $d E�'a-'S'"x o •u1 apisialeM 0902 U UOSIGN Aw$J8r:ai5 Gg iry N w a z N o z 0003 111. T U i N �e f 10:E 53'9,;•`n�.. Ft€6; Q Q' IN .i/l i-1 1-.Ol .mf -1 0-.8 E w m a ] 6 ( i k s al £l A -.s .Ot-.Bar e o s m - do-.ez n _ F i buy t m t/iB-.fl 1-9 S-Zl �> >T, L . c o b 1 _. � i .ZA 9-.02' b S Z/l (-hXliC -(-9 .�(�-An! OL ,. Z/l L -.B-._-.. . .i/t Ol b ._. - _- - .. -.til m -.+z .. -._ .. . _ -2436- W Q W K St6Z-L98-10 � z VMS NW punoW 62 o 1 jgasa egg" c ul ap!saa}eM o9oZ o � a£�a��•r�i W a d LLd >F7€4��39�io2o 0 o a o 000 ti o� W Q W K g F � W d LLd ti o� oQ i i i j i i i 1dVHS ��J'Vn�13 3101bA3'93 N'x ' W S O x y LL' 911 6 I 6p 8 E 4 4, .il S -S u o rte 0 0 S LU 0 a c� w a to to a F W. a uk . who u ��3l9t.�u O s U E i' a F W. a uk . who u s _ 1 I worooyoA o�t+otlzA5wwn Z SL6Z-M-ZL9 o 119£SS NW punoW $ w P �` •ul apisialeM o9oZ o UOSIGN Aweier a" _ a o a o M.9 -2438- •E=— Consulting Engineers & Surveyors " 2638 Shadow Lane, Suite 200 • Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Phone (952) 448-8838 • Fax (952) 448-8805 www.bolton-menk.com August 17, 2017 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2017 Retaining Wall Improvements City Project No. PW -17-04 Award of Bid Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: Bids were received at City Hall on August 16, 2017 for the 2017 Retaining Wall Improvements project, with the following results: CONTRACTOR BASE BID BASE BID + ALTERNATE Barber Construction $255,355 $258,355 JL Theis $293,946 $296,696 Rosti Construction $299,040 $303,540 Sun ram Construction $345,923 $347,563 Environmental Associates $410,842 $424,527 The low bid from Barber Construction is within 10% of the Engineer's Estimate of $226,000. They are based out of St. Bonifacious, MN and are well qualified to successfully complete this type of work. This project includes a base bid and an alternate. The alternate includes the installation of hydrophilic mulch. We recommend the award of the Base Bid + Alternate, as the additional cost for the hydrophilic mulch is justified at the prices bid. It is our recommendation that the Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the 2017 Retaining Wall Improvements in the amount of $258,355 to Barber Construction. Sincerely, BOLTON & MENK, INC. Brian D Simmons, P.E. City Engineer DESIGNING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW Bolton & Menk is an-2439-aortunity employer RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID FOR THE 2017 RETAINING WALL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — PW -17-04 WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 2017 Retaining Wall Improvement Project —, bids were received on August 16, 2017, opened and tabulated according to law, with the following bids received and complying with the advertisement: WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of staff to award the Base Bid + Alternate, which includes site restoration utilizing hydrophilic mulch, AND WHEREAS, it appears that Barber Construction of St. Bonifacious, MN is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Barber - Barber Construction of St. Bonifacious, MN, in the name of the City of Mound for the 2017 Retaining Wall Improvement Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August 2017. Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk Base Bid Base Bid + Alternate Barber Construction $255,355 $258,355 JL Theis $293,946 $296,696 Rosti Construction $299,040 $303,540 Sunram Construction $345,923 $347,563 Environmental Associates $410,842 $424,527 WHEREAS, it is the recommendation of staff to award the Base Bid + Alternate, which includes site restoration utilizing hydrophilic mulch, AND WHEREAS, it appears that Barber Construction of St. Bonifacious, MN is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Mound, Minnesota, that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Barber - Barber Construction of St. Bonifacious, MN, in the name of the City of Mound for the 2017 Retaining Wall Improvement Project according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August 2017. Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, City Clerk 90;0010111•MOM RESOLUTION AUTHORIZINGTO DEBT SERVICE LEVY SCHEDULES AND TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS IN THE DEBT SERVICE FUND FOR BOND SERIES 2015B & 2016A WHEREAS, the City of Mound has issued General Obligation Improvement Bonds in association with its annual street improvement projects and General Obligation Tax Abatement Bonds; and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has pledged its full faith, credit and taxing powers to the payment of principle and interest on the Bonds; and WHEREAS, assumptions are made as to the amount of special assessments associated with a bond issue/street project and those assumptions require periodic adjustments to reflect the actual experience; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The revised debt schedules for the bond issues described in Exhibit A replace the original bond service levy schedules for the remaining life of the bonds. 2. The revised debt levy schedules contained in Exhibit A be submitted to the County Auditor to replace the information currently in the County's bond registers for existing issues. 3. The City of Mound will levy special debt levies according to the schedules provided in Exhibit A, and made a part herein. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August, 2017. Mayor Mark Wegscheid Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk O` M 0p 10 w C� 0% C% 42C� C� C� C� C� OOC� C� C� C� - - - - - - - - - — - - - K Exhibit A Page I of 3 u 9 0 rwo 00 ------------- C� C� C� C� C� C� C� 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 C) 00 C� C� C� din C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� 10 N 10 cq � C� 01 V m M N Ol C, N m 0 C� m 0 01 <t C-4 -e Ol 10 w 0 w O < C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C�l C� N cq O < CL 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 C> Exhibit A Page I of 3 u 9 0 rwo 00 ------------- C� C� C� C� C� C� C� 0 0 0 = 0 0 0 C) din C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� C� 10 N 10 0 C� m 0 01 <t C-4 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oo 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b� 6,�gagoo .— y st 7 7 7 00 00 p� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N v 'C A U V1 M N M M M M M M M M M V1 r W O O h W 00 M W M 00 00 00 00 M M 7 M O O r% b h D\OO etl FC ti n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Vt 00 00 00 M 00 00 00 M M � 7 M O aoo M�nrrr^r rre 'nrno C O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y � oNo Q` .• h � � r oo .. O O N � M e� f•- et N � --� 00 h N V� tV d` h v d a C E 1.1 C. O ti C � � u .moi 0.'F -2443- Al u Exhibit A Page 2 of 3 � y C ; S Y o z a O Q'\ N N M 7 7 M h b b r r 00 OG T 7 N O O m r- C b b r r r 00 � Q` O O a g3 0 W N N M 7 00 00 D\ T d'\ N O 00 N W 8 Q+ O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N SMig O �� C �n O M C O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U d a C E 1.1 C. O ti C � � u .moi 0.'F -2443- Al u Exhibit A Page 2 of 3 0 0 0 0 C, 0 0 C> C, C> Ell - - - 2-0 IIE CE F Z> �::, (��, E, 0- C:I PXI AMA Exhibit A Page 3 of 3 • •MUSUMN • • WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mound is the governing body of the City of Mound; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a resolution from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of and for the City of Mound, entitled "Resolution Authorizing The Levy of a Special Benefit Levy Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.033, Subdivision 6 and Approval of a Budget for Fiscal Year 2018"; and WHEREAS, the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, must by resolution consent to the proposed tax levy of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Mound. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, that a special tax be levied upon real and personal property within the City of Mound in the amount not to exceed $218,404. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said levy, not to exceed $218,404, is approved by this Council to be used for the operation of the Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority pursuant to the provisions of MSA 469, and such proposed special levy shall be certified as a tax levy to the County Auditor of Hennepin County on or before September 29, 2017. The final special levy shall be certified to the County Auditor of Hennepin County by December 15, 2017. Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August, 2017. Mayor Mark Wegscheid Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk 1 aelml:W44 [.B:j 04 11111 J, I I ki F--1ZYWeJ4 0 14 I �19 A BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the following preliminary 2018 General Fund Budget appropriation, including capital: NOWM. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby direct the County Auditor to levy the following preliminary taxes for collection in 2018: SPECIAL LEVIES Fire Relief G.O. Improvement 2009A G.O. Tax Increment 2009D (Dump) G.O. Refunding Bonds 2011A G.O. Improvement 2011 B G.O. Improvement 2012A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2012B (PS Building) G.O. Improvement 2013A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2013B G.O. Improvement 2014A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2014B G.O. Improvement 2015A G.O. Improvement 2016A G.O. Refunding Bonds 2016B Total Special Levies Preliminary Certified Levy 68,001 215,600 175,000 342,015 192,523 50,000 349,000 100,000 45,000 41,120 75,000 272,000 148,896 50,000 2,124,155 3,580,301 5,704,456 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, does hereby adopt the preliminary overall budget for 2018 as follows: As per above 5,614,463 Area Fire Service Fund 1,439,730 Dock Fund 209,703 HRA Transit District Maintenance Fund 43,200 TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1,692,633 Recycling Fund 182,959 Liquor Fund 720,274 Water Fund 1,966,658 Sewer Fund 2,373,110 Storm Water Utility Fund 429,100 TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 5,672,101 General Fund 5,614,463 Special Revenue Funds 1,692,633 Enterprise Funds 5,672,101 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 12,979,197 Adopted by the City Council this 22nd day of August, 2017. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid -2447- CITY OF MOUND — PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 TO: City Council FROM: Eric Hoversten, City Manager and Director of Public Works DATE: August 16, 2017 SUBJECT: Report to Council Following Public Works Committee Meeting to Discuss Westedge Pathway/Trail Proposal LOCATION: Project Corridor is along Westedge Blvd from CSAH 110 (Bartlett Blvd) south to west terminous of east/west portion of Westedge Blvd (Halsted Blvd) REQUEST: Council approve instructions to Staff to remove pathway/trail design and construction from the 2018 Street and Utility improvement Project as proposed in the original project Feasibility Report. CITY STAFF REVIEW At its 25 July 2017 Regular Meeting, the City Council heard comments from residents responding to the Engineer's recommendation to include a pathway/trail surface for pedestrian and bicycle users within the public's existing Westedge right-of-way as a part of the 2018 City and Met Council roadway and utility improvements within the corridor. The Council indicated in its discussion and approval for the overall project that follow-up discussions would be held before any specific plans regarding a pathway/trail were finalized. On 7 Aug, 2017 the Public Works Committee comprised of Mayor Wegscheid, Councilmember Salazar, City Manager Hoversten, and Engineer Simmons met to further discuss the options regarding the proposal. All members of this committee had visited the site individually following the comments from local residents regarding the project that were raised during the 25 July Council Meeting and Project Hearing. As a result of the site visits, further analysis of the district, and discussion; the PW Committee will recommend the Council NOT include completion of any pathway/trail work as part of the 2018 improvement project. The initial inclusion of this scope was based on expressed intent contained in the Mound 2030 Comprehensive Plan indicating the desire to create network of pedestrian and bicycle pathways, trails, and corridors over time that would connect various areas of the community with each other, and as well with the Regional Trail as shown in the schematic below. Lake A c -Poet Future Pathway System VA Neighborhood Park+Rayground IN L e �a ew Part ON clow ry anity 'Play"d Corntrrvrnity Park Special Use Park: 0n Nature Conservancy r,rea Open Spaces; gi Parkc. Pa ng Oc0r, & Conxr r , Future Park. Open Space & Recreation System Figure 5.7 +G p --—,n Tfi l n A.i',Nrk w+tc �y:x.xgr,r3 w.n Some progress has been made in achieving the proposed network outcomes as the opportunity to incorporate varying degrees of pathway/trail performance into existing rights-of-way during ongoing/past street and utility improvements has allowed. A review of the overall pathway/trail objectives identified in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan show several proposed segments that may require re -analysis; this segment included. In particular for this segment; the connecting network that supports the utility of this segment and justifies its cost and impact on the local neighborhood has not materialized as of yet, in particular along the CSAR 110 (Bartlett Blvd) corridor. The Committee determined that this investment should be deferred until such time as the connecting elements of the network are present, and the functionality the Westedge/ CSAH 44 and CSAR 110 intersection (Westedge and Bartlett) is improved. The Committee also determined that during the Comprehensive Plan 2040 update process, a careful analysis of the proposed network should be undertaken to ensure appropriateness and feasibility within existing rights-of-way for each of the yet -built routes. RECOMMENDATION The City Council for the City of Mound make a motion to direct Staff to remove the design and construction of a pedestrian/bicycle pathway/trail along Westedge Blvd from the 2018 Street and Utility Improvement Project and to re-evaluate function and feasibility for recommended trail segments as part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update process underway at this time. P CITY O� MOUND 2415 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD - MOUND, MN 55364-1668 - PH: 952-472-0600 • FAX: 952-472-0620 - WWW.CITYUFMOUND.COM Corridor Residents Westedge Boulevard Mound MN 55364 August 14, 2017 RE: Courtesy Notification: Mound City Council Follow-up Action, Proposed Pedestrian Pathway/trail in Westedge Right Of Way At its 25 July 2017 Regular Meeting, the City Council heard comments from residents specific to the Engineer's recommendation to include a pathway/trail surface for pedestrian and bicycle users within the existing Westedge right-of- way as a part of the 2018 City and Met Council roadway and utility improvements within the corridor. The Council indicated in its discussion and approval for the overall project that follow-up discussions would be held before any specific plans regarding a pathway/trail were finalized. On 7 Aug, 2017 the Public Works Committee comprised of Mayor Wegscheid, Councilmember Salazar, City Manager Hoversten, and Engineer Mr Simmons met to further discuss the options regarding the proposal. As a result of this further analysis and discussion, the PW Committee will recommend the Council NOT include completion of any pathway/trail work as part of the 2018 improvement project. Council will be provided this feedback from the PW Committee at its 22 August meeting and be asked to consider and act upon instructions to staff to remove the trail/pathway from the project design. Impacted residents are invited to attend the regularly scheduled Council Meeting at 7:00 PM, 22 August 2017 in the Council Chambers and offer comments and feedback as we continue the process to define the 2018 project details. Sincerely, Eric Hoversten City Manager and Director of Public Works erichoversten(a)-cityofmound.com 952-472-0609 1 ow am w® 0 HL zm a. (1) W co a c 0 w rL w(1) z0 =C 04) tiE T- CD UJ CN -2453- Mound Fire Department City of Mound January - July, 2097 Fire Alarm / False Alarm Report Fire No Date Address Alarm Type Fire Smoke CO Activity or Action Taken False Pre - Alarm ventable 10 1/8/2017 59671dlewood Road x CO levels found N Y 18 1/11/2017 2590 Commerce Blvd x Nothing found Y Y 20 1/12/2017 5600 Grandview Blvd x Extinguished Fire N Y 36 1/30/2017 4743 Richmond Road x CO levels found N N 44 2/8/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Set off by construction Y Y 50 2/13/2017 5227 Bartlett Blvd x Cancelled enroute N Y 65 2/24/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Set off by construction Y Y 88 3/13/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Set off by construction Y Y 90 3/15/2017 2670 Commerce Blvd x Reset alarm N Y 96 3/20/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Burnt Food N Y 97 3/22/2017 1 2131 Commerce Blvd x Cancelled - on site testing Y Y 99 3/24/2017 2333 Wilshire Blvd . x Alarm Reset N Y 128 4/12/2017 2451 Fairview Lane x Cancelled upon arrival N Y 133 4/17/2017 2948 Pelican Point Circle x Replaced Battery N Y 134 4/18/2017 2308 Driftwood Lane x Burnt Food N Y 149 4/29/2017 2333 Wilshire Blvd x Canceled enroute Y Y 202 6/5/2017 5308 Three Points Blvd x Fire in Garage - Extinguished N Y 204 1 6/5/2017 1 2451 Fairview Lane x Child pulled pull station Y Y 218 6/9/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Set off by construction Y Y 244 6/11/2017 2501 Commerce Blvd x Faulty Detector N N 262 6/21/2017 5616 Grandview Blvd x Low Battery N Y 263 6/22/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Cancelled enroute Y Y 270 6/25/2017 5600 Grandview Blvd, #213 x Nothing Found N Y 272 1 6/25/2017 2650 Lakewood Lane x Cancelled (burnt food) N Y 281 6/28/2017 2150 Old School Road, #251 x Low Battery N Y 286 7/1/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Set off by Burnt Food N Y 300 7/7/2017 4939 Grandview Blvd x Replaced Battery N Y 308 7/9/2016 2020 Commerce Blvd x Burnt Food N Y 310 7/10/2017 2020 Commerce Blvd x Set off by construction Y Y 327 7/19/2017 2133 Cedar Lane x Low Battery N Y 345 7/29/2017 1545 Bluebird Lane x Cancelled Y I Y 2017 YTD TOTALS -2454- J:\admin\REPORTS - Fire Incident & Performance\2017 Performance Reports\2017 Fire Alarm - False Alarm Reports by City IMMFToWA Date Weather Cumt17 Cust16 Variance 2017 2016 Difference +/- 7/1/2017sun80s 668 741 -73 20409.72 23437.35 -3027.64 7/2/3O17sun 8Os 477 1000 -533 12836.59 31874.96 -19030.87 7/3/JO17sun OOs 721 721 21418.47 21418.47 7/4/2017sun 8Oy 576 575 1 13443.71 14080.42 -636.71 7/S/3O17sun 91 250 266 '16 5328.6 5680.9 -362.3 7/6/2O17sun 94 356 295 61 7829.55 5989.27 1840.28 7/7/3017 SUN 84 532 269 363 15513.92 6199.33 9314.59 7/A/ZO17sun mid OOs 647 599 48 17737.75 14153.92 3583.83 7/9/2O17ovrrstmid 8U 285 741 `456 6359.56 19017.25 -12657.69 7/1O/3O17sun mid 8Os 316 316 5947.63 5947.63 7/11/2O17ptsun 8S 384 305 79 8191.64 6377.83 1813.81 7/12/2D17sun mid 8Os 331 357 -26 7393.11 7721.6 -328.49 7/13/2O17ptsun 89 338 337 1 8540.7 7986.98 553.72' 7/14/2O17sun 82 675 383 292 18058 10511.44 7546.56 7/15/2O17ptsun 9O 707 712 -5 19448.63 18409.94 1038.69 7/1G/2O17sun 83 312 795 -483 6724.07 20363.63 -13639.56 7/17/2017 PT SUN 89 338 338 7319.45 7319.45 7/18/ZO17er|yrain 9U 331 353 -32 7601.57 7487.99 113.58 7/19/2O17mid day rain78 341 ]GO '27 8099.69 8220.4 '120.71 7/2O/2O17ovrcstmid 0O 403 383 19 9449.14 10511.44 -1062.3 7/21/2O17humid DOs 713 443 270 21544.88 11592.62 9952.26 7/22/2O17sun hi80s 783 679 184 22375.21 18461.1 3914.11 7/Z3/3O17sun 78 268 619 '351 5442.39 16162 '10719.61 7/24/2O27ptsun 82 301 301 5888.61 5888.61 7/25/2O17ddyGpnorain 349 337 22 7277.95 7132.19 146.76 7/J6/2O17SUN 85 314 325 -11 7377.41 7026.83 350.58 7/27/2O17sun U4 405 303 102 10713.82 6786.83 3936.99 7/2A/2O17SUN 82 648 383 265 18136.08 8114.47 10021.61 7/29/2Ol7sun OS 610 692 '82 17906.18 17473.54 432.64 7/3O/2O17sun 83 297 737 `440 6384.65 20515.91 -14231.26 7/31/2O17sun 85 318 318 7239.27 7239.27 TOTALS 14093 12897 1096 357938 331299.2 24425.2 -2455- Q u Q 2 u C u c LL m W O Z CO CDtij r tO m h N m m r -M V M W V O V) CO N M V m W-, P, V Oh Ow NmNmNm Wh0MWO W h } V to MrCDn mr Oc mON O>oc OhMCO V Mm V h0 V NN J M W CO N to h n to O M W LO m r- r v Cpp r V M M _N M h h V 0 M V O M N h N W V W r V 1- O7 r r to N M N ocW to "' LO N LO r O" N V th N r N V V `�' N `" N r N N M CD N O N co V W M W MOS hto"to V Mh W V O V M tO cO u)Mm mco 1� O mOCp y mtoW WCDmm W CDM Wm V NN 1 -01 -Nm W n0w0mm CO MMO 1- w W m m W Il Il r to CD m r M m CD O W O V O W c m V r to n m N h W W V m r W 0) N V in U) N M O M W O n � N r V tl7 n O V C[) V CD N to N r Ut W VNCLSmM WtD W NO W OtOO VO hrrMmw Lom N CDn0 O Z M O tO tO "" V N V r O `-' N V h N r N r W V N r r N h N O 'V_ N OO o M O r a r 0W h OO m ' h V 1�m V to NCOWMn 0NW VrNdm O CO tO CO h n V tonmN M M M M N W M M M 0 W co co WOO CDMhm It WMt() to z0 MNm COr V h hCD V Whto VL Mtn t`hh V rONn Mm M COOn V =F- } MMNMNrh CO W M Nmto�MtO M VmMWCOOM W) NVN 0 O Z N W N h V M h m r O W h 0 V r tf') h. r r N m 0) M M V d r h. co a SvW h O V tt>�VN M to yr MCON m V "'N r rNOO M .14 N m W M N N N CD M N }O N Uz CO tO V m V V h V h m MSO W W h M n m N W O m h W V O 00 N O M N CD m V N n O W M M M m h W m M tD O W W h M M M M O m n pg J c O CA c! r W m n CD V: oc h M) ClW W IQ r n n CD ocr C! V: W M n W N CD M _ h V 0 N 0 M W W M mmNmmCOM MtoWhhmNM V MN CD V m N to V O M h m r O r.- n CD r r tO h r r W N V M LO M M O n CO Cy Q .-t()tO '-�V NM tf)vrMCON 0) V rr rNr r V: V:N U N N O CO M p" MCD V~m c)r- ' rn V oOmntOmto ~M m h NO00 NN 0o M U) O mwCj r. = m h W t() h Cl) co M m co co to Cl) CO CO CO W W V t() W LO t0 Cl) N co V U to m m O m to M n CO fl WIri to to W h to n tO h CO O CO r m V tO t« h O V N V O co n CO O CO CON m 0 M M W M N M t(') V W V O W N to N N tO M co n tO N O M h 0)r O h n W r LO h r r O m V V Cl) co O n CO M Q N LO LO `-' V N M to r r M coN "� O V `" r r N m M N V N Q) N ... co m CO M pj } CO V N M m M mh V Pm N to to (D W M N h N ' m CD O h 6 0o inh mWK)0W tom NCMMmtotoldMMCOmW co COCDhmmM N V Wn O Q t() O cc t- N to CO N CO m W r V r W C'!tO n V n M h r M C t_ N r CO M N h to O m to h N W to CO tO co m h CO CD Ch M to V M LO CO r O N N N M V O N M m r O CD h 0 CO v r h h r Cl) V M n h WN to n co pp D] V V) U) V N Co to v r M CO N r V r r r 0 M M V N O W N M O CO M p U. r O to 60 M n - h V Nm V to N CO N O N W n h W N M to tO r i' mV 0 N 0 n m mvU)hMmNOW W hOMOOm t0 V Vm tO h CO N CO to to nrr W V; VLo0 V_r`0CDnCD (q c! W WMn tb COrN O Q m to h LO n 0m CD h Cl) t() W m LO M 0) V M LO V N CM N to M W h N r h O co V O h M r O CO n0 COO N W U) r r N CO CO V 0) V' n f� CO r Z M --t LO `"'V NM nr rmCDN r"N V "'CO rIOO M M VN r m r r r n M I 0 c -e m 2 c<<<< o c N Y oro Z IL ¢mQ ro M V t() CDm r N m Q m U "§ Q. C N N N N W N N N .a 4 O C O O 00 C C ro .�. N N N C Y O U CO co y N O = T- N N d d N O N N N N N ro 22 W� CO � Z E E E E D E E E m m m y �` _� N N N N .O '6 .0 U -p m p N to 'O z O O p 0 cA _ O fn y > > > > > > > N ."_�' LL O O O O C C O O O C C C C C G _ O mT4 E O n o o n x w $ a n w w w a O m» to c °) ,d 2) m3 N J ro rod N x x '� E E E E EEE M `o y Z LL LL Q Q V �. m It6 (D ? E I`O a Q Z a� o> p¢p ti m a) o @00000000000000 roc �LL 0 y �t�Qof—c�c�c�c�t�c�c�c�t�c�t�c�c�c�c p F- mg O coD cn= �w� (L ►— oq N toOrN2 0u' c'vul �, -g4 W') 0)0toV r = O N N N M M M M M M M M M (D M M M M V VO' VN' Vh' COO tOD C0 O ChD Cho W CO) co 00OD0000 LL w w a woOw000m �; I m N vw - 0 N 0 min w C14 0 M a) 0 to v) q z; CN C14 0 co P- t- V0(0 O 0 CD V' 0 m w v h M (0 a) v OO(D W-OOCIJ LO Cjc) v) m to (D a (d to C6 CNF 06 4 C6 Na) NON 00 0 't CF) M00 LO — st (0 CN 0 f 2) C) 1-: M — Cl) cl) - 00(D a) - LO cl) I O Lo fl- v (D Cl) 0 0 0 (D 00 U) 0) co - CF) 0 cot 00 C) 00 (D! CIIL LQ ccCli aci Cli Ct (Q too (WD ll:� cl(q n 0� r,-� C14- It r- — 1: LO N M 0) to LO 04 M CF) 0 CIJ co - (D a) r - (D co o cl) LO a) 0 0 r.- z LO 00 m 'IT co CV 'WC' cl� o(z cl! u) VL q (q G! -I cl n' 0 (D M' Cl) 00 r.- m CO M 00 st 00 0 rl- CD 00 r-- a) w (0 r- - N 00 0 It CIJ 00 q 0 :� W 1" M 0 - oc� N NN ": 0 C) m to 00 CD C) 0) 't O 'T (0 (N LO ul V) M 04 N N to U') 00 fl- u) m v N " Cj 0 Cl) (1) N r- to 0 cl) M 00 to r- 0 LO CD 'T 00 oto 00r (D 0�; to N M M M to W O Nr r- " 0 Co r- - cl) cl) C',L Oi t-� -: - I r".:. O- cl� 141 c'! (q "1 17! q I CV LO m Cl) LO (D a) N co cy) 0 .t 0 r- (D 't v N Cf) cli to LOI 00 11 00 - N LO r- (1) 0 00 00 0 m 0 NOWOOOMO " - 0- N .-I eae-.�-a�-8e ee..e-I.-�.. .4 (M moomwmoc o� (q r-� U� (IU U? 4Z (I CR Ci c? P-� UW V'W rl-� M owrl-MN 'r Nr NOW I -T CF) r- rl 0 N I- m N w to v w to w 0 m N V) omow0000 to N 4)r U) (n 0) — 0 4) 4) (D 0 M '- (D U) i! E u 0 - C >1 m - co E(o 0 a (U 0 0 0 (n D 4) U- US n U- < Orn (a 0) Z N 0 f 2) cc� cq C� 171 (Q IQ Cl! cy! cl r r 2 0 (7� cct cct r r W (31 cl! CN! ul N (D u) NO st C, I-- LO r- (0 (N 04 04 04 - U) m tl- a) CN N C%F — 1: It 0 C) (0 00 0 LO (.0 It C14 V) M CF) 0 CIJ co - (D a) r - (D co o cl) LO a) 0 0 r.- z LO m 'IT co CV 'WC' cl� o(z cl! u) VL q (q G! -I cl q r-� q R Op -I IQ c,%[ oo CY) Lo N V) rl- U') oo m P` Co 0 0 CY) cl) a) to 0 (D m P, ce) to M LO 04 CIJ 'IT 0 clj - - q 0 :� W 1" M 0 - oc� N NN ": I- N N C\l fl- - M cl) CD Or 0r 00000 M C14 u) m v N N 0 cl) M tc (7� v to N M M M to W O Nr w LO c6 cli c6 -i c6 CNT a) NC14 W0) cl) Wu) r et (D N cy) - (Y) a) o o o o c) c o too clju)o 000aowo r m 0 00 00 0 m 0 NOWOOOMO ,-L NL q "ILV C� C� q C� q CIJ C) V) Cl) (D N 00 0 too v r- (A a N u-) r-- o r-- (D 6 c6 g g g (1) N rh 0 0 M M- fl- 0 cCM0 11 gi cMd N 0 to It - C14 N clj CN 0 N C) N Lf) C6 05 1-: CVT cli cli .4 E 4) ca to N 4)r U) (n 0) — 0 4) 4) (D 0 M '- (D U) i! E u 0 - C >1 m - co E(o 0 a (U 0 0 0 (n D 4) U- US n U- < Orn (a 0) Z N 0 f 2) LL rn E 2 0 0 0 > -i457-W ui 0- z co z 'LL U) U- I-- w < 0 L C: ro w 0 0 co ui Z) z w W 0 DI U) 0 CL W W 0 LU 0 z Z LL 0 _z nUJ O W r Wcn :)I n N W 0Wr >'a 2 0 N � X 7 W'. m � U co LLJ (1) 1- a o W 11 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ o \o \ \ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O)M ('M O m O O M t0 N O) O 00 O O M m V' (O N r O O O O V' N a0 O tt) (D (M n O n N M tc)(0ON V Nn M (f) ef'00Oto M M t(')00m OO(DNt0 Cp 00m tD <t V' r r OmO LO to M0 MOOmm0N t0 O m t0 m t0 st m 0 0 n M O 0 0 M 0 M 0 (D to 0 O n n O n N N 00 0 IT 00 m M t, C\ N mCY� t� V- N v r 06 N M t, N m Cl) n m 00- (D n N r t, N O r W N M N N r O M t 0 ' m t0 t0 M m n V' ' (n t0 NOO Cl) OOMMMOONM 00 V mOr C nn V M00 COOn r a! (D NCl) 00 V' M CM Cl) M m M,t N V' N N N r (V t0 M N ' O m W LO 0 to (0 M (O ' th to 0 O (O N MNOMOO(Orm a) Cl) 00 m N N MOrtoNMn V' V• mMr O C14 M 00 V' V n V' to V' M- N O N O O O O O O t0 m n O M O n 0 MOOOM (fi 000 :IWO (00(00 N (f) c0 t0 n O io (() t0 (0 (D r (D N t0 co m 0 nO(ON MOmnn(TO tonnNO nn� MrOO(OM MNM (D LO v r V 00 (n 0 0 N n (o O) N 00 t0 n co cli [t V' N 4,0 MtDM LQ Cl�h O 00 CN M V4' V r M nt0m Mn ' ' 0Na0O NNN°'v`''0n M.M-M 00to MNMN mn t0U M Oit ) s 00 N t0 M CO t0 mO ' ' ' ' NM 00 nO to V:orNiv N�� ko vi ((D an-lto rN n (O O) 00 (0 M M m 00 rn O t0(0N OOO NN V'M m (OO Nv MO r --N M r N 0 0 o tO fQ `6 N t[f o 0 0 0 0 O n M C C C C C O 00 (D O (D r*.: CP Omn LO NO LO LOco rr. m N m M n O (D)N00 ' ' 0) OO 00 _M N N(mMN (3) 't st VN n to cO r O M to m i� M 00 m `' `- U) r M 00 st (p Cl) n - 0000 MnOn t ' MOm000 t0(0O(O N 00 MO"I CO Om NMn V'O NO to (O It N r ct m N co 00 r- 80000 t0(0 a'OrN a)Nt()n ad Nv O M(MDM 111 CNc0 Noc r r r N M It V' W NMO ' N M O ' ' O a) CC) to t0 4) (D M t() ' ntOO M (0 mO O O O N m N O m O (D to _ m O) M 00 to N (O N N MOr tO NMn V! VL mMr m (0 cN M m M V' `g' n N t0 O O co LO It Cl) N O ' Cl) ' tf ' N n 00 O r- -q n OO (0 ' co' to n O 00 Oma n00M m 0) co Cl N to M O Ft0nQ)nOm m m M jd r to (n r� N M d' r V' M n 7 M r n' M to 00 ' m n N O N' 00 O O V M N (0 M co 00 v to O to m n i9 M m n(nM nto Mnn O O m (0 M N n v N r 7 M t 00N mMmor-w O ' OOO ' OI m N O M n V m m m r Om d. (O N m N M NrnNO OO c-- LQ v N t0 r to r M OO m a(, 00 N '4' d r Cl) M 00 N M N 0 _z nUJ O W r Wcn :)I n N W 0Wr >'a 2 0 N � X 7 W'. m � U co LLJ (1) 1- a o W 11 0 0 \ \ \ \ \ o \o \ \ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O)M ('M O m O O M t0 N O) O 00 O O M m V' (O N r O O O O V' N a0 O tt) (D (M n O n N M tc)(0ON V Nn M (f) ef'00Oto M M t(')00m OO(DNt0 Cp 00m tD <t V' r r OmO LO to M0 MOOmm0N t0 O m t0 m t0 st m 0 0 n M O 0 0 M 0 M 0 (D to 0 O n n O n N N 00 0 IT 00 m M t, C\ N mCY� t� V- N v r 06 N M t, N m Cl) n m 00- (D n N r t, N O r W N M N N r O M t 0 ' m t0 t0 M m n V' ' (n t0 NOO Cl) OOMMMOONM 00 V mOr C nn V M00 COOn r a! (D NCl) 00 V' M CM Cl) M m M,t N V' N N N r (V t0 M N ' O m W LO 0 to (0 M (O ' th to 0 O (O N MNOMOO(Orm a) Cl) 00 m N N MOrtoNMn V' V• mMr O C14 M 00 V' V n V' to V' M- N O N O O O O O O t0 m n O M O n 0 MOOOM (fi 000 :IWO (00(00 N (f) c0 t0 n O io (() t0 (0 (D r (D N t0 co m 0 nO(ON MOmnn(TO tonnNO nn� MrOO(OM MNM (D LO v r V 00 (n 0 0 N n (o O) N 00 t0 n co cli [t V' N 4,0 MtDM LQ Cl�h O 00 CN M V4' V r M nt0m Mn ' ' 0Na0O NNN°'v`''0n M.M-M 00to MNMN mn t0U M Oit ) s 00 N t0 M CO t0 mO ' ' ' ' NM 00 nO to V:orNiv N�� ko vi ((D an-lto rN n (O O) 00 (0 M M m 00 rn O t0(0N OOO NN V'M m (OO Nv MO r --N M r N 0 0 o tO fQ `6 N t[f o 0 0 0 0 O n M C C C C C O 00 (D O (D r*.: CP Omn LO NO LO LOco rr. m N m M n O (D)N00 ' ' 0) OO 00 _M N N(mMN (3) 't st VN n to cO r O M to m i� M 00 m `' `- U) r M 00 st (p Cl) n - 0000 MnOn t ' MOm000 t0(0O(O N 00 MO"I CO Om NMn V'O NO to (O It N r ct m N co 00 r- 80000 t0(0 a'OrN a)Nt()n ad Nv O M(MDM 111 CNc0 Noc r r r N M It V' W 0) N U _N C N C p (.i O C rn 'm 15 y 'N C '(q = Z CL O y Z ,"U_ U` O` C D 47) O T N CL c _ D o w N I m_" c rn Z yy aai 0 w (n o m m2 2__ o� 2 C a) 'rn C m N C y y a�`� F- rn M Z 1� d o -J C O 2 Q C N ,.O„ Z Cl � C y N 0) N N .0 Q LL li' U7 (/i w U 0 M U a p O 'T' O C y y N :t. O O E� t6 N 2 N r- 15C 1' N O f` t0 (n IL tL f6 Q. N O z(.)IL W[L<-10000-W(L0)(L �►-c>_245$-�¢nt-c>�(nt-1-�(n�of(n 0 0 NMO ' N M O r , 00 M (0 mO O Cl) M N V V m (D M N M M m M N- V 0) N U _N C N C p (.i O C rn 'm 15 y 'N C '(q = Z CL O y Z ,"U_ U` O` C D 47) O T N CL c _ D o w N I m_" c rn Z yy aai 0 w (n o m m2 2__ o� 2 C a) 'rn C m N C y y a�`� F- rn M Z 1� d o -J C O 2 Q C N ,.O„ Z Cl � C y N 0) N N .0 Q LL li' U7 (/i w U 0 M U a p O 'T' O C y y N :t. O O E� t6 N 2 N r- 15C 1' N O f` t0 (n IL tL f6 Q. N O z(.)IL W[L<-10000-W(L0)(L �►-c>_245$-�¢nt-c>�(nt-1-�(n�of(n 0 0 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner, Commissioners David Goode, Jake Saystrom, Jennifer Peterson, and Jameson Smieja. Absent: Philip Velsor, Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, and David Pelka. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Members of the public: Joe Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Adam Schutu, 5459 Bartlett Blvd; Thomas Stokes, 5239 Seabury Rd; Gary & Paulette Johnson, 4006 Limonite La; Tony Brough, Hennepin County; Lindsey Roal, 5459 Bartlett Blvd; Derek Jordahl, 1575 Bluebird La; Troy Koopman, 1732 Canary La; Nik Hawlity, Performance Pools; Larry Kasner, 2670 Commerce Blvd; Debra & Keith Kullberg, 1567 Bluebird La; Kristin & John Beise, 3124 Tuxedo Blvd; Ron Trach, 5740 Bartlett Blvd; Terry & Liz Knight, 2670 Commerce Blvd; Thomas Pfeiffer, 1808 Shorewood La Two additional items were added to the agenda as follows: Additional items were handed out for Case No. 17-19 and the Comprehensive Plan MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to approve the June 6, 2017 meeting minutes as amended. MOTION carried unanimously. 1-1-6m, J %N PLANNING CASE NO. 17-14 & 17-25 MINOR SUBDIVISION & VARIANCE 1567 AND 1571 BLUEBIRD LANE APPLICANT: KEITH KULLBERG Sarah Smith reviewed the previous application and added the following: e The new lot configuration eliminates the "flag lot" and requires a variance for lot size. -2459- Planning Commission Minutes July 18, 2017 • Applicants are also requesting six-foot side setbacks and 40% hardcover allowance. • Applicants are working with the MCES for a SAC determination due to the previous existence of a former house burned down in or around 1970. • If a SAC credit applies, the City also would not collect the utility trunk fees. • Staff review of the code is that park dedication fee is not required as the property includes 2 existing lots and the subdivision is making the vacant lot more conforming and is similar to a boundary adjustment. Previous easements were taken for street purposes but function as utility easements. Staff suggests an added condition (#23) that the property owner shall be responsible for requesting the vacation of easements on the property, if needed, as part of a future, separate application. Saystrom commented on the lot dimensions and paved driveway requirement as they related to the hardcover requirements. Smith stated that there are pervious products allow an 85% reduction in hardcover. Saystrom also mentioned parking for the new lot. Smith said that parking must be accommodated and would be reviewed as part of the future building permit application. Keith Kullberg, 1567 Bluebird Lane, believes that they have things covered for the new lot. MOTION by Goode, second by Peterson, to recommend approval of Planning Commission Cases 17-14 and 17-25 subject to conditions to include #23 as added and findings of fact as presented by staff. MOTION carried unanimously. SURFSIDE PARK AND BEACH, 5801t Sarah Smith gave a brief history of the application brought forward in the June 6, 2017 meeting. City Manager Eric Hoversten was invited to address the commission to provide details. Hoversten provided the following: • HC established a cooperative relationship to provide invasive species education initiatives. Lake users and high traffic areas meet. The sign would be viewed as one enters the parking area as well as for traffic in a southwesterly direction. This location gives both context being by the lake, and exposure due to high traffic counts. • Height of the sign is designed to keep the panel of the sign in the line of sight for traffic, which is about 4 feet higher than the base of the sign. The panel size is recommended by HC. In addition to AIS messages it can be used for emergency management information. Planning Commission Minutes 3 July 18, 2017 • Sign is made available to grant applicants for general city information as well. • City pays only cell and electric bills; proposed to be operational only during daylight hours (possible exception of emergency information) extending the life of the sign, limiting electric consumption and light pollution. Tony Brough, Hennepin County, stated that the software is very user friendly. Emergency messages are especially designed for those that don't listen to radio. Saystrom wanted to know who would operate it. Brough said that there can be many users with different levels of permission. Saystrom was concerned about it being actively managed, not allowing information to be out dated. Hoversten related that the messages can have a start date and end date. No need to aggressively monitor. Saystrom also indicated that distracted driving is a concern. He asked that graphics be limited to more static messages. Peterson asked about the benefit to the city. Hoversten said the system enables cities to participate with HC and other agencies to manage Lake Minnetonka. Past methods of notification were less than successful. Hoversten also said that there is value in being able to push public information with specific measureable value to each individual. It is hard to assign a true value to something like this. Peterson asked if there were no other locations in town that would be appropriate. Hoversten said that it could be put where there is no lake use at the expense of that context. It could be put deeper into the launch for the limited number of people who use it; or bring it out to the right of way for the 8,000 people that pass by every day. Peterson asked if there was a monetary value. Hoversten it was an advantage to have the unit free of charge, but there is no ongoing monetary value. Peterson wanted to know how long it would be up. Hoversten said that the track record of early technology was 5-10 years. This is more advanced technology. Brough expects a 20 year life span. Brough said, specifically it had a 10 year life span of running full blast, 24/7. The Right of Way Department personnel could provide insight into the distracted driving issue. There would be no videos. It will be a 10 second message, a 5 minutes rest, another 10 second message, etc. Right of way people have looked at it for safety. Penner inquired as to how far down the road the sign is viewable. Hoversten stated that the note, read, and comprehend will be different for each driver; probably not much further north than Gillespie Center, which might include 3 or 4 message cycles. Planning Commission Minutes 4 July 18, 2017 Peterson asked if it would be the same message as in Spring Park. Brough responded that Spring Park was the pilot program. The planned cycle will be the same as Spring Park; however, the contract is written so there is flexibility. Peterson sees the Bartlett area as such a busy section of town; the sign would be such a distraction. Penner thought that closer to the launch would be more specific to boaters. She asked how many of the drivers would be boaters and care about AIS. If they aren't boaters do they need to see the sign? Hoversten replied that a lot of the traffic is circular traffic traveling through the area on a daily basis. We are called Land of 10,000 lakes for a reason. The AIS message isn't specific only to Lake Minnetonka. Smieja confirmed the size (48 to 50), height (10 to 15), and location (10 feet from the ROW). His question was what other location could meet the objectives. Hoversten said there are 2 areas within the parking lot. One median contains the lift station and is inaccessible for the sign. The only other spot is the median closest to the lake and that location would lose the vehicular impact. Peterson queried about the regional park signs. Hoversten stated that, outside the park they are static signs for unsafe ice messages and are used specific to Three Rivers Park users. Smieja asked what the grant money was for; to bring AIS information and/or public information. Brough said that there are contributions from feds for the public information aspect, and money from the state is for AIS information. Penner asked if the sign could be smaller. Brough replied that there might be options but that this is the smallest to provide emergency management information. This is the same size that you see at every gas station. Ronald Trach (5740 Bartlett) — had several questions. What would the messages be on the sign? How bright is the sign? Would it have moving letters? What direction does it face? Would it have commercial advertising? How often does the message change (a week, a month...)? How would it operate in the winter? In his opinion (living across the street) it is way -2462- Planning Commission Minutes July 18, 2017 too tall, too big, too distracting, too commercial looking, it impairs his view to the lake, and would feel like living across the street from a gas station. Mr. Trach is opposed to it. Brough said that it can't be sold for commercial advertisement, no flashing, no videos. Hennepin County is constantly changing within a week; city changes are up to the city. Light intensity is adjustable with a dimmer at night. Hoversten said that the intent is to orient for southbound traffic. Saystrom asked if The Langdon or the auto repair shop on Commerce wanted a sign like this, would it be allowed. Smith said this is a residential zoning district. There is a provision in the code for changeable messages in the commercial districts, but 12 square feet is the size limit. Larry Kastner — 2670 Commerce — why are we doing this. There are signs at every landing. If you are a boater you understand it. Distributing city information — Gillespie Center. Who, specifically, is going to man it? Storm warnings aren't necessary. Number of cars (8-9,000) is a stretch. You will see it when you round the curve. Launch is heavily used and boaters are well aware. Does that sign say "this is what we are going to remember about Mound". Terry Knight - 2670 Commerce — Larry summed it up. It's one of the best parks on Lake Minnetonka. The sign would be terrible; a safety issue. He doesn't want to look at that sign every time he drives into his house. Liz Knight — 2670 Commerce — we tell children not to text and drive; this is the biggest text in the world. What do the police think of this idea? Saystrom stated that, if we must have the sign, he would like to see a wood frame or something that has some character to it. Smieja thought the goals are good; communicating information and emergency messaging. Smieja doesn't like location, safety factor, look and feel of the park; can we make it add to the look of the park; digitized messages at places like this is the future but he doesn't think this is the spot for it. Smith clarified that the recommendation on the screen is from the June 6t' report with an addition AIS and available for other public information. Bill Bruns (2630 Setter Cir) asked if the sign would have Amber alerts. Brough answered that they do not now, but could be. MOTION by Smieja, second by Saystrom, to recommend denial of the request based on the proximity to roadway and park. MOTION carried unanimously. -2463- Planning Commission Minutes 6 July 18, 2017 PLANNING CASE NO. 17-13 SWIMMING POOL REQUIREMENTS APPLICANT:.•KOOPMAN Smith introduced the request as highlighted below: • Currently, the code requires enclosure of any swimming pool over a certain depth. • Historically, in 2014, a similar request was made with a PC recommendation of approval to the CC. • ASTM standards of static load, cover holds 485 pounds, entrapment protection, surface drainage test, labeling requirements must be adhered to. • Several cities in our vicinity have incorporated this change. • Staff is recommending approval. Saystrom asked if the inspection of the pool cover part of the inspection process. Smith replied that it would be similar. Saystrom asked to what extent the inspection can confirm these standards. Smith stated that the cover would have to be certified conforming. Smieja asked if the discussion in 2014 indicated what the functionality would be in 20+ years. is there language about keeping them functional? Would we be banking on the property owner to maintain them? Goode stated that the key is personal responsibility. You would have to shut the pool cover when you're done using it; a fence doesn't require that. Smieja asked about the specifics from 2014. Smith said it was a lakeside pool with 3 sides that were fenced. We have a lot of water around already. Accountability is a factor as well. Troy Koopman (1732 Canary Lanes) appreciates the comments about personal responsibility. He will have a cover regardless. Nick Halley (performance pool and spa) has been in the industry for a long time. The product they carry exceeds the ASTM standards. Smith asked Mr. Halley if cities were putting inspection programs in their codes. Mr. Halley stated that, if they were, he was not aware. No city has retracted their adoption of the code. Each unit has a lockbox with a light switch. You cannot get to the switch without the key. The closing of the cover is 100% attended. -2464- Planning Commission Minutes July 18, 2017 MOTION by Saystrom, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of pool covers as an alternative to a fence enclosure. MOTION carried unanimously. PLANNING CASE •, MINOR:r •° BOULEVARD AP 1QC4VNT, • • :• •• •ASHBAUGH Smith introduced the subdivision request as follows: • Parcel to be subdivided into three lineal configurations • Single family home, heavily wooded sloping to a wetland • Maintaining the existing structure on the center lot • Existing house will conform with required zoning standards • The three lots will have separate driveways • Watershed has been contacted and a wetland/pond delineation report will determine the edge of the wetland; a buffer will be assigned as required • The Minnehaha Creek Watershed (MCWD) also commented on an existing stream on the property. It is debatable whether it remains a stream. The MCWD indicated that, if it determined that is no longer a stream, it will not have streambank limitation requirements. • Subdivision conforms to city code as well as comprehensive plan standards. Smieja questioned whether the driveway was existing. Smith indicated that it was. Without the curved lot line, the driveway most likely would have had to been modified there would have been variances for improvements that didn't meet the code. Saystrom noted the small, one foot piece alongside the driveway. Smith stated that the required setback for driveways to the property line is one foot. Saystrom asked, given the location of the driveway and configuration of the lot line, would it prevent the adjacent owner from putting a garage on that side of the house. Smith said that would be likely. She indicated that the house setback wouldn't work and was the driving force for curving the lot lines. Tom Stokes, applicant, said that they looked at making the existing garage front loaded, but the structure was not adequate. Also, if the lot lines hadn't been redrawn, the 60 -foot front requirement wouldn't be met. Saystrom asked if the area influencing the variation of the lot is a parking area. Stokes indicated that it was. Stokes stated that, the area that has been referred to as the retaining wall is actually an at - grade patio wrapped with railroad ties, part of which will be removed. The comment about the -2465- Planning Commission Minutes 8 July 18, 2017 streambed has us scratching our heads. We can't find anything that is anywhere near that outlet or any pipes. Joe Bruns, 2630 Setter Circle, asked about the platform that he uses to park his trailer. Stokes states that the driveway access will be gone. Bruns also inquired about the timber retaining wall that is falling apart near his back yard. Stokes said that it will be repaired or replaced with vegetation. MOTION by Goode, second by Peterson, recommending approval with staff recommendations and findings MOTION carried unanimously. PLANNING CASE NO. 17-19 EXPANSION PERMIT — . BARTLETT ., ,• ADAM ,O. Smith introduced the request as follows: • Existing home is lawful non -conforming due to lakeside setback of 47 feet instead of the required 50 feet. • Hardcover to be reduced from 55.6% to 44.7%. • Project will remove the non -conforming west guest structure; existing house will be remodeled; addition on the west will be constructed above the 933.0 minimum required elevation • The addition will be non -conforming on the lakeside at 47 feet from the OHW • All other conditions will met requirements or be improved • Staff is recommending approval Lindsay Roal, 5459 Bartlett Blvd, indicated that they are requesting permission to extend the addition in a straight one to maintain an ascetic look from lake and increase to the livability to 3 bedrooms Smieja asked about the remodel of the crawl space Roal stated that the crawl space was not being remodeled but that the entry is being moved away from that area. MOTION by Smieja, second by Saystrom, recommending approval of the expansion permit with conditions 1-8 and findings of fact 1-5. MOTION carried unanimously. Planning Commission Minutes 9 July 18, 2017 Old/New Business A. Update on 2040 Mound Comprehensive Plan Project Smith provided a handout updating the comp plan process as a take -away. Commission will revisit in August. B. Cancellation of Tuesday, August 1, 2017 meeting due to National Night Out— rescheduling to Tuesday, August 15th MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to cancel August 1St meeting due to National Night Out. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to set a special commission meeting on August 15th, 2017. MOTION carried unanimously. C. Staff / City Council Liaison Report / Update Smith • Trident final plat is anticipated in August; Serenity not far behind * Spirit of the Lakes this weekend • Dog Days upcoming on August 12th • Council requested research into vacation rentals VRBO's and air B & B's. Goal is to get back to Council for an Aug/Sept meeting and then back to Planning Commission. It's being fast tracked • Sarah is out of the office for the September meeting; Rita will be covering. 09L9111291 MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to adjourn at 9:26 pm. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -2467- August 8, 2017 Dear City Administrator: 505 Nicollet Mall P.O. Box 59038 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0038 We are writing to inform you that on August 2, 2017, CenterPoint Energy filed with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to change its rates for utility distribution service. A rate filing is the regulatory process that public utilities must follow to formally change rates and services for their customers. This filing will affect the rates paid by all of CenterPoint Energy's customers; more than 840,000. The process for changing our rates will take about one year, with interim (temporary) rates implemented on October 1, 2017, and final rates implemented in 2018. Additional information is available at our website at CenterPointEnergy.com/RateCase. Sincerely, CenterPoint Energy