Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
79-08-28
CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota CM 79-314 CM 79-300 CM 79-308 CM 79-305. CM 79- 311 CM 79-316 CM 79-303 CM 79-312 CM 79-309 CM 79-297 CM 79-306 CM 79-315 CM 79-298 CM 79-304 CM 79-299 CM 79-310 CM 79-307 CM 79-313 CM 79-301 CM 79-302 Mound City Council August 28, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 1. Minutes Pg. 2464-2468 2. Public Hearing - Cumberland Road Pg. 2458-2464 3. Mortgage Revenue Bonds Pg. 2457 4. County Road 110 Pg. 2456 5. Parking A. Mound Bay Park Parking Pg. 2451-2455 B. Parking - Community Center Pg. 2449-2450 6. Construction on Commons Pg. 2446-2448 7. Street Construction A. Driveway - 2160 Ashland Pg. 2444-2445 B. Street Construction - Retaining Wall Pg. 2441-2443 C. 1978 Street Project Pg. 2439-2440 D. Other 8. Subdivision of Land Appeal-Lots 7,8&9, Block 8, Pembroke Pg. 2434-2438 9, Commons - North Park Pg. 2429-2434 10. Request for Refund of House Moving Permit Fee Pg. 2427-2428 11. Comments & Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 12. Licenses A, Gambling License - VFW Pg. 2422-2426 B. Restaurant & Cigarette - Hope's Bar-B-Q 13, Community Action Agency Pg. 2401-2418 14, HUD Grants Pg. 2400 15. Red Cross Agreement Pg. 2397-2399 16. Dock Permits - List # 3 Addendum # 2 Pg. 2395-2396 17. Equipment Repair Bid Pg. 2393-2394 18. Planning Commission Member Pg. 2392 19. Payment of Bills 20. Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 2343-2391 21. ComMittee Reports Pg. 2419-2421 Pg. 2469 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota 8-28-79 August 27, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-317 SUBJECT: Addendum - HUD Grants Council Memorandum 79-310 referred to increasing the minimum income from $5000 to $7500. Attached is a copy of proposed criteria for establishing special assess- ment grants. The 30 day application period would begin just prior to the special assessment hearing so they can be prepaid or partially pre- paid without interest. Also, a committee to establish criteria for allocating the money should be established. We presently have a committee for rehabitation funding. The same committee can be used or another appointed. There should also be a committee for the diseased tree money. Note: Under the privacy act, only those people in the office dealing with applications for rehabilitation, special assessments and diseased tree funds can know the name of the applicant. The Committees, Council, etc. should get the information by number only. That is, each applicant is assigned a number and the name is known only to the person t~king the application. Leonard L.Kopp ~ / ~ SPECIAL ASSESSP'IENT GRA ITS PROGR.~\I DESCRIPTION: Qualifying lo~v income residents of ~.~Iound may apply for grants to help off-set special assessment payments. Funds for the program are a result of hte federal Community Development Block Grant Program. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: To qulify for the program the applicant must live in Mound, reside on and own homestead property, and maintain an annual gross income below $7,500. Since the grant funds are limited, not all applicants are guaranteed assistance. ELIGIBLE GRANT PAYMENTS: Portions of special assessments levied this year may be eligible for grant assistance. SELECTION CRITERIA: After a ~,o~-m~!t~ application period, all applicant requests ~vill be reviewed and verified for program eligibility. Selection of grant receipients will be made on need of applicant for assistance when compared to total appli- cations and funds a~ailable. APPLICATIONS: Applications are being taken at City Hall on ~veekdays from 8:00-4:30. Interested applicants are encouraged to fill-out the application in person and to bring along 1978 tax return forms to verify income eligibility. '28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 27, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO.' 79-96 SUBJECT: Park Commission Minutes Attached is a copy of the Park Commission Minutes from their August 23rd meeting. On Pages 3 and 4, some of the material on Tuesday's Council Agenda is covered. Iqi, nutes of HOUND ADVISORY PARK COHNISSION August 23, 1979 Parks are People - Island Park Area - held at Island Park Hall 4845 Manchester Road Present: Larson, Shay, Case, Lynott, Peterson, Bollis and D. De Laney. (Anderson, Hasek and Bailey excused) Citizens present at meeting: Harriet Dewey W.R. Willette Rita Peterson Gert Gerold Thomas W. Gerold Gary Snyder John Kluth Kathy Kluth Gordon Swenson Don Stewart 5042 Tuxedo Blvd. 5226 Lynwood Blvd. 2348 Fairview Lane 4600 Manchester Road 4600 Manchester Road 4876 Leslie Road 4432 Denbigh Lane 4432 Denbigh Lane 4844 Manchester Road 4856 Leslie Road The meeting was opened by an introduction by Chairman Larson, with a brief back.- ground of the Park Commission and how it was originally formed, its goals and achievements. Park members introduced themselves stating time served on the com- mission and in what area they lived. Pat Shay gave the slide presentation, assisted by Jon Lynott, using an area map and indicating where the various parks were located in Mound. Presentation covered: Mound Bay Park, painted in the past week in colors of overall building in beige ~ith dark cinnamon trim. Showed beach area, play area, picnic area and also used for swim- ming lessons, With life guard, and a boat launching area. Highland Park - open area, play equipment and skating rink during winter. Twin Park, off of Highland Blvd. green area. with natural vegetation. The Highlands, has no winter dock storage, good sliding area. Ridgewood Park, small area, used for boat launching and is located off of 110 and 44, turn left on Ridgewood. Used by small children between ages of 3-5 years old. Bluffs Tot Lot, no development Bluffs Access to lake, undeveloped Woodcrest Outlot B - all marsh, Outlout A ~ land does not lend itself to filling, developer dedicated money in lieu of green space, wild life area. Indian Mound Park - west side of Langdon Lake, LAWCON funds being solicited for this and the lake with restricted use of no motorized water craft as the lake is too shallow and too small in area to support motorized boating (canoe, rowboat or sail boat) Langdon Heights Park, behind School Forest, there is a baseball diamond and play area for small children plus walking trails. Brookton Park- open play area, basketball court and identified by bridges around the the park Belmont Tot Lot - benches for mothers, play equipment for children up to appx 8 years of age, rowboat sandbox. Harrison Beach - wild life area, swimming beach, dock and used for boat launching before June 1st and after September 15th. No pets allowed on beach has new driveway Parks are People - Isl~ Park Area p.age two mat of bitumioou$ material. Edgewater Tot Lot - equipment for small children'and area is fenced on one side and posted on the other Seton Park - behind the Marina Apts. has a tar mat on basketball court, used by pre- teens and teenagers, has good u~age. Carlson Park - large flat area, volley ball area, commons and boating Avon Park - east o~ Burger Chef Pebble Beach - small area with bench and a good swimming beach Three Points Park - ~nder construction, only the tennis court and small area are us- able now. Black Lake Bridge area - fishing along the road Avalon Park - quiet area with natural vegetation Pembroke Beach - has bbach and play area Question from the audience, r~garding area to the right of the telephone pole on the play area side, that is always filled with water, what causes this? (see Slide #64) Answer - Bollis explained this is probably an outlet for a culvert or could be a break in same that has seepage and accounts for wetness in this area Boone Park - only the top of the park has been developed with play equipment. Question from audience, will there be a picnic area here? Answer - Yes, long range plans has this planned plus a basketball ar~a towards the East. Chester Park - small beach plus swlmmi.ng dock Island Park Playground - this has been professionally planned with ~egard to place- ment of equipment and hopefully ~ny problems have been anticipated in the planning stage so there will be no serious problems arising later, HUD funds have helped finance this park. The fill used in this park would have a value of: $35',000. but it came from our'own road construction. Park will have baseball backstop, tennis court, a lighted skating rink and if possible the Island Park Hall can be. used for a warming house during the winter and supervised activity in the summer during in- clement weather. There will be a Tot Lot on Donald Road, w~th equipment placed at the top and bottOm of the area. Buffer zones are planned and trees will remain, tennis court will have a natural berm and shrubbery. Sanitary facilities are planned for the park. and plans are on file-at the'City Hall. Filling has produced adequate drainage and when it is completed, i~ will be leveled and seeded, hopefully before this winter. Wychwood Beach - has 'swimming dock and swimming leasons are given here, Tyrone Park - has ice skating in winter with a warmi.ng house, road by park is angled for some parking convenience. ' Question from audience - How many parks in Mound? Answer - approximately 28 recognized parks. Comments from audience: Avalon Park - Would like to see it cleaned up, broken bottles,refuse strewn along shore. Pembroke Beach - Woul~ like to see a safer approach to Pembroke Beach when you have to cross Tuxedo Blvd. Suggested possibility of cross walk on Tuxedo, flashing light for pedestrian c;ossi.ng, stop sign? Bollis explained this is a Minnesota State Aid street and the State has juris- tiction as their funds'help support this road. State will not go along with Parks are People - Island Park Area page three what the City might an easy, logical solution time consuming ~o get any action. ~s problem and it is Doone Park - broken glass seems prevalent in this park. Would like to see picnic tables and park benches installed. Larson explained the park hours are 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. and if there are violations oF these hours it is a matter of police enforcement to see that park usage after hours is not abused. Pembroke Park - no refuse containers. Shay informed them they are there, just have tO look for them. Larson gave brief resume of ptans for glackLake Fishing area. This is heavily used are for fishing. After the Black Lake Bridge is modified, they want to build a median strip in the middle of the road, expand the shoulders and parking area to 3 or 4 feet wider allowing cars to park on one side of the road. Opposite side would have a bike-hike bath. There would be a fishing dock parelle~ to the lakeshore extending 200 to 300 feet. Upgrade the approaches for safer fishing and walking. Question from audience - is there a possibility of acquiring area for Tot Lot by Wilshire Blvd. and Cardiff Lane? ' . Answer - the Park Commission does~ave enough funds to purchase this outright. Can be acquired through assessment of surrounding homeowners, a feasibility report would have to be requested firs and then a public hearing before anything could be done. Would you want to absorb this expense for an additional Tot Lot? Park Budget is appx. $90,000.00 in the past HUD funds were used intthe upgrad- ing of our parks but now they'have restricted fund usage and we can no longer depend on ~his money. DoonePark - slide has hole in the bottom of it, children can't use it. Vandalism caused this distruction. Discussion peFiod ended - brief break. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Larson, Rita Peterson and Mr. Willette presented slides on property on Morton Street Channel, that lead to Harrison Bay. Slides Showed dock, property on either side of channel, house across from Willette's with a boat house, new home on channel, large posts laid across bank (possible soil erosion prevention?) Lynwood Blvd. Willette stated that at one time Tonka Toys in- tended to use the channel for fire protection and boating, had started dredging but he failed to give them easement, through a misunderstanding, and the project was dropped. Slide also showed a small,short, step-dock by the mou't~' of the channel over a culvert. Larson asked why this had never been placed on the dock location map? Shay stated that ~urvey showed there was no boat usage of channel. When sur- veyed and visited in 1975-76, a dry year, channel so shallow only mud was vis- ible, with few ducks walking on same. Peterson requested dock permit for the remainder of 1979 season. Lars~n stated there were no permits left to issue. Will be put on the November agenda when all dock locations are reviewed'and will change this classification so it can be used for dock- ing. Willette stated he had used the channel since 1955'and there was only one year when water was too shallow to allow boat usage, he had never had a permit or knew that he was supposed to apply for one. Motion by Shay seconded by Larson that minutes of the meetings of August 9 be approved as submitted, Lynott stated corrections, page 1, should be Ed not Steve Hasek, LAWCON, dY7 not Lawcom, page 2. ion by Shay 2nd by Larson, tf 'minutes of August 9, 1979 with accepted corr¢ , be approved. Unanimously roved.. Mo~ion by Shay seconded by Larson that minutes of the meeting of July 26, 7979 be approved as submitted, unanimously approved, t~otion by Shay seconaea ~¥ Larson that minutes of the meeting of July 1~,'1979 be approved as submitted, unanimously approved. Ci:zy Manage~ not present but acted upon his various memoes: The Community Center is now painted, and would 'like to have a sign put up that would identify the building. Motion by Shay seconded by Lynott, "Sign to be two lines, 1st line to read MOUND DEPOT, 2nd line to read COMMUNITY CENTER." unanimously approved. The Vanguard Cee Bee Club has painted the Community Center, please inspect. Shay stated she had see the building and was pleased and satisfied with the work. Color combination very pleasant and Cee Bee's should be commended for their dedication to this project for'their time and labor in painting this structure. Motion by Shay seconded by Lynott, "That a letter of commendation and thanks be written to the Vanguard's expressing the Park Commission's thanks." Unanimously approved. Larson will dictate letter. Letter on Community Center Parking area and disturbances originating from there. Considerable discussion on the various alternatives offered to help alleviate or elim'inate this problem. Concensus that problem seems to have shifted from the Mound Clinic parking area to th!s area. The solution seems to be in the law itself, whereby it is stated that the legal hours for park use are from 6:00 A.M. to 10:OO P.M. with no drinking allowed in the area. Suggested con- spicious posting of park regUlations near the parking area lot, so infringe- ments are clearly stated. Motion by Peterson seconded by Larson, "City Ordin- ances with reference to City Parks be more stringently enforced with reference to legal use of parks during hours al lowed, enforce no drinking ordinance and disturbing the peace with regard to loud music or.,objectionable language or ment of individuals using the park." Unanimously approved. Pay Phone in Community Center, not grossing enough income for Continental. Considerable discussion on this, lifeguards have no close phone in case of emergency, if building is closed. If phone were attached to building, newly painted, afraid of graffiti defacing the walls and obnoxious words, agreed ' that if phone were moved outside, it would be more accessible for usage-and generate more income for Continental. Motion by Larson seconded by Lynott, "Pay phone be installed in the Mound Bay Park area, through outside installation for year round use and NOT be mounted to the building, simplified, move phone from INSIDE TO THE OUTSIDE." Unanimously approved. Jackie Meyer's report gone over, commented on good theme on activities, her efforts'to get turnout of area residents in the Three Points area. Motion by Lynott, seconded by Larson, "Jackie Meyers be commended for the outstand- ing purgram she instituted in getting participation of area youngsters to share recreational program." Unanimously approve~. Shay appointed to write letter. Larson moved and Reterson seconded motion, "Pat Shay. did a very professional job on slide presentation and side comments that enlightened and expanded understanding of various parks covered." Unanimously approved. ""77 Parks ~re Peop. le - Is] Park Area ' page f ire Park Director - Bollis. Stumps and 10gs have been removed from D00ne Park. Contractor moved in more dirt now has to be regraded and leveled and some fill removed' by same contr.actor befdre it can be finished. Was ready for seeding before this happened. Hopefully this can be accomplished before cold weather sets in. There being no further business to discuss, a motion was made by Lynott seconded by Case that meeting adjourn to next scheduled meeting of September 13, 1979. Unanimously approved. D De Laney McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS · LAND SURVEYORS · SITE PLANNERS August 24, 1979 Reply To: 700 Cedar Street Alexandria, Minnesota 56308 (612) 762-2157 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Bartlett Boulevard County Road 125 Bike-Hike Path Dear Mr. Kopp; As your aware we previousily have opened bids on construction on the subject bike-hike path. After the bid opening the Council asked us to see if the County would not agree to construction of the bike- hike path or would permit construction of barriers between the paved shoulder and the traffic lane. We have talked to several people in the County up to and including Herb Clausner regarding the possiblity of the County blacktopping these shoulders. They have all emphasized that the County does not have this in their budget, there is no traffic need for paved shoulders on this street, and the County will not pave the shoulders for the bike-hike path. To explain a little bit futher, the County feels that designating bike-hike paths on shoulders is not a safe mixing of bike traffic with County Highways which carry higher volumes of traffic. When they need paved shoulders on a county road, they will pave the shoulders and permit its use as a bike path figuring having bikes on the shoulder is safer then having them on the main travel lane. Consistently with this opinion, they will therefore not label the shoulders for bike paths as many municipalities do. Herb assures me that there is no need for paved shoulders as far as the County is concered on this stretch highway. He also assures me that there is no money in the immediate future for paving these shoulders even if it was necessary. I asked him "if paved shoulders were a requirement for the City to accept ownership of the street could he find the money to do it?" He merely smiled. Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls p~ir~ted o~ rec¥cl~d papc~r Mr. Leonard Kopp August 24, 1979 Page Two There is a definate opinion that the County will, under no circumstances, permit any type of barrier along the edge of the travel lane and the bike lane. I have to agree with that opinion. I think that to put any type of barrier as was discussed such as. curb blocks or reflecter stakes would interfer with the use of the road and present more of an overall traffic hazard then would exist with just bikers using the shoulders. Hope this information will be helpful to you to determine whether to awards the bid on the bike- hike paths. It does not look good that the County would consider paving these shoulders. There does not seem to be money in the budget for it and we have experienced this with several other projects that the County has eliminated. As a final of all this, we have asked several times for the County to confirm their position in writing and they have not done so. I have the feeling that they many never do so. We realize this is not a very definitive answer, but I think that it can be assumed that the County is not going to provide paved shoulders unless they receive substantial pressure to do so and probably the City taking over the County road is tied in with the pressure. If you have any further questions or if we could be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIAES, INC. William H. McCombs, P.E. CITY of MOUND August: 27t 1979 5341 MAYWO.r.,D [.~OAD MOUND, Mh'qN~SOTA 55364 (6~2) 472-1.155 Mr. James W, O'Brien Williams/O~Brien Associates 45 South Ninth Street Minneapolis~ MN. 55402 Dear Jim: The Contractor you sent out to cover the skylight appeared a week ago Wednesday, left all his material and went home. After looking at the roof, he said that there was too much water and said he would call you~ Since over 10 days has elapsed and he hasn't returned, I wonder what happened. With all the rain, we just seem to get more leaks. Hope you can hurry the process. Sincerely, Leonard L. Kopp City Manager LLK/ms cc: City Council Attorney Leonard Kopp, Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Blvd. Mound, Minn. 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp: Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building Seventh Street and Robed Street ~ ~ . Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 /~,~ ,/"~ ~ Telephone (612) 29,-6.453 /'~'"'x.'~'x ~,/ ~.~ ~ ~ / Office of the Chairman t , In the next three months, I will be meeting with local officials and key administrative officers of communities throughout the Twin Cities Area to discuss matters of mutual concern. You are cordially invited to one such meeting, to be held in i th~Freshwate~Qloqical Institute~,~ located at the Intersection / of Co. Rd. 15 and Co. Rd. 19, Orono on Thursday, Septe--m~r The purpose of the sessions is to strengthen communications between local government officials and the Metropolitan Council. I'm new in my job as Council chairman. I haven't had a chance as yet to meet with many of you. I want to learn first-hand of your concerns, particularly as they relate to the performance of the Council in carrying out its responsibilities for long- range planning and coordination in the Twin Cities Area. I would also like to share with you my ideas on Council priorities and the role I would like to see it play in our Region. One subject that bears discussing is the Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 19'76. I would be happy tO try to answer any questions you have about the law and problems you may be experiencing in meeting its requirements. Representatives of several neighboring communities and school districts and area legislators are being invited to the meeting. I hope that you will be able to attend. I'm looking forward to the opportunity of meeting with you and other local officials from your Area. Sincerely, Charles Weaver Chairman CW/kg i',.~IN NETONKA CONSERVATION DI CT NOTICE and AGENDA Special Meeting, 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, August 29, 1979 L~%CD Office, 402 East Lake Street, Wayzata 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Public Hearings: (a) Pelican Point New Dock License (b) City of Wayzata New Dock License and Variance 4. Action on Licenses and Variance 5. Other 6. Adjournment By order of the Chairman 8-24-79. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. Sou'Ih Hopkins, Minnesol-a 55343 93,S-3381 August 23, 1979 Mr Lyle Swanson, PE McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth MN 55441 Dear Hr Swanson RE City of Mound Bike Paths - CSAH 125 The County's response to the questions in your July 30 letter include - - County Project 7586 is tentatively scheduled for contract letting and con- struction in 1980. This is the bridge reconstruction of the Black Lake Channel bridge. Our Maintenance Division has tentatively scheduled (con- tingent on budget approval) a bituminous overlay project for CSAH 125 from CSAH 15.to CSAH 110, excluding the areas recently reconstructed. No other County projects are proposed for CSAH 125. - ~ith completion of the bridge reconstruction projects and the bituminous overlay, the County intends to begin procedures for turning jurisdiction of CSAH 125 back to Nound and Spring Park. - The County won't allow any obstruction (posts or curb) closer than 22 ft from the roadway centerline. Placing posts on curb closer than this creates snow removal, drainage, and safety problems. Lyle, you stated the planned bike path width is 6-ft. This isn't consistent with County design standards for a 2 way bike path. The recommended minimum width is 8 ft. If you have any questions, please contact Doug Mattson at this office. Sincerely c /James H 1.,~old, PE {-~'hief~ Planning and Progranmling J cc: Leonard Kopp/ HENNE?IN COUNTY on equc]l opporlunlly employer REGULAR HEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL August 7, 1979. Pursuant to clue.call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on August 7, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Robert Polston, Donald Ulrick, Benjamin ~ithhart and Gordon Swenson. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Engineer Wm. McCombs and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting:of July 24, 1979 were presented for consideration. Swenson movec] and Withhart seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of July 24, 1979 as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. PUBLIC HEARING - DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS The Mayor opened the public hearing for input on said delinquent utility bills and persons present to do so weEe afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. No persons presented objections and the Mayor then closed the public hearing. Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-313 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY STAFF TO SHUT OFF SERVICE TO DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS The vote was unanimously in favor~ STREET CONSTRUCTION Grove Lane Retaining Wall Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion to direct the engineer to proceed with the construction of the retaining wall at 2740 Garden Lane excluding the driveway. Roll call vote was four in favor with Lovaasen voting nay. Lovaasen moved and Polston seconded a motion directing the engineer that any future easement exceeding the engineer's estimate of $500 is to be approved by the Council. The vote was unanimously in favor. Bedford Road Easement Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-314 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN $850 EASEMENT PAYMENT FOR AN EASEMENT ABUTTING THE PROPERTY AT 2854 CAMBRIDGE LANE DUE TO THE LOSS OF A 25" DIAMETER MAPLE TREE AND THE STREET BE CONSTUCTED AT A 28 FOOT ~.IIDTH. The vote was four in favor with Swenson voting nay. Preliminary Report - Cumberland Road The t~ayor reopened the public hearing for input on said preliminary report and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions: Ernest Johnson, 4651 Manchester Dale Reimer, 4639 Manchester Tim Shea, 4633 Manchester PolsLon moved and Withhart seconded a motion to continue this item to the next meeting on August 14, 1979 and a decision will be made at that time regarding the construction of Cumberland Road. The vote was unanimously in favor. August 7, 1979 Change Order No. 1 - 1979 Street Project Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-315 RESOLUTION AUTIIORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO SIGN CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE 1979 STREET PROJECT The vote was unanimously in favor. Assessment Policy Withhart moved ahd Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-316 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A~I ADDENDUM TO ASSESSMENT POLICIES FOR THE 1979 STREET PROJECT Withhart moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to include item llA in the assessment policy addendum. The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion to include item llB in the assessment policy addendum. The vote was four in favor with Ulrick voting nay. The vote on the above resolution was unanimously in' favor. Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion to pledge one mill ~ th.e'C?t¥,~s share of the street project. Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to table this item. The vote was unanimously in favor. SURPLUS DIRT The Council discussed the problems encountered with distribution of surplus dirt from the street project. CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE Mr. Gary Dostal, the new area commercial manager for Continental Telephone invited the Council to visit their new store. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Ron Gehring inquired about'the assessment policies and when they will be adopted. Ann Grimm commended Councilmember Swenson on concern about disposition of surplus dirt. ORDINANCES Commercial Dock Ordinance Withhart moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to adopt the ordinance herein quoted by title: ORDINANCE 401 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 41.25 OF THE CITY CODE ADDING SUBDIVISIONS 2, 3, 4 AND 5 RELATING TO COMMER- CIAL DOCK LICENSE APPLICATIONS, DEADLINES AND FEES FOR LATE APPLICATIONS The vote was unanimously in favor, so ordained. See Ordinance Book page No Parking Ordinance Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to adopt the ordinance herein quoted by title: ORDINANCE 402 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 46.29(b) OF THE CITY CODE ADDING SECTIONS 57 TO 60 PROHIBITING PARKING ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS The vote was unanimously in favor, so ordained. See Ordinance Book page August 7, 1979 BASS FISHtNG CONTEST Wi thhar[ moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-317 RESOLUTION APPROVING A BASS FISHING CONTEST ON AUGUST 26, 1979 The vote was unanimously in favor. HORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS The Council determined to await Further legislation before setting a workshop cia to. LEVY LIHITS Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-318 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE TO INCREASE THE LEVY LIMIT BASE TO 584.77 FOR MOUND The vote was unanimously in favor. AGREEMENTS Planning Grant Agreement Withhart moved an~ Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-319 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO E~TER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA STATE PLANNING BOARD The vote was unanimously in favor. Joint Agreement with County on Urban County HUD Funds Withhart moved and'Pol-ston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-320 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY ON URBAN H.U.D. FUNDS The vote was unanimously in favor. TRANSFER OF FUNDS Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-321 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF CERTAIN CITY FUNDS. The vote was unanimously in favor. PAYMENT OF BILLS Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of $25,707.66 where funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES RESPRESENTATIVES Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-322 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE RESIGATION OF PAT MALZ AS RESPRESENTATIVE TO THE WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES BOARD AND APPOINTING KATHY FISHER TO FILL HER TERM. The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-323 RESOLUTION APPOINTING BEATRICE TANGEN TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION. The vote was unanimously in favor. August 7, 1979 CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE CASE ~[thhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-324 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORHEY TO INTERVENE IN THE CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE RATE CASE The vote was unanimously in favor. SPECIAL HEETING REQUEST ~,/ithhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to call a special meeting on August 13, 1979 at 8:00 p.m. with the agenda as set 6y the Hayor dealing with the Police Department report. The vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNMENT Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn to the special meeting on August 13, 1979 at 8:00 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned. Mary H. Marske, City Clerk/Treasurer LeOnard L. Kopp, City Manager 0-28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 24, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-314 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Cumberland Road Attached is a revised preliminary report on Cumberland Road which reduces the cost of the project and eliminates a long sewer run. This plan would require use of individual lift pumps by two building sites and would necessitate a subdivision of lots for building sites. ~Le'onard L. Kopp ' ' ~ '/~ McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS III LANO SURVEYORS ~l SITE PLANNERS August 20, 1979 Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3'/00 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road MoUnd, Minnesota 55364 Subject: Preliminary Engineering Report Cumberland Road Gentlemen: Enclosed is a revised cost estimate for streets, sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer for Cumberland Road extension from its present end to Stratford Road. These costs are based on the unit prices for the 1979 street project now under contract. The costs are based on a revised sanitary sewer plan. Instead of connecting to the existing sewer on Manchester, all but two of the proposed lots would be served by connecting to the existing manholes at Stratford and Cumberland, and Cumberland and Essex. The remaining two proposed building sites would be served by individual pumps which would be installed by the property owner at the time the houses are constructed. These changes are shown on the revised plan. The alignment for the watermain and storm sewer, would remain the same as shown on the Preliminary report. The alignment for the proposed street has been shifted slightly at the east end to give more distance between the curb line and the existing house on Lot 30. The total estimated cost for this project would be $82,143.55. The revised lot arrangement furnished by the owner for the south side of Cumberland shows 8 building sites which would share the cost of the sewer and water. The assessments on this bases would be $2,196 per unit for sewer and $1,996 per unit for water. If the streets and storm sewer were assessed along with the 79 Street Improvement Project the cost per buildable site would be approximately $2,368. The extra grading for the street construction will be approximately $700 per buildable lot. The total estimated assessement per buildable lot on the south side of Cumberland would be approximately $7,340. Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls Honorable Mayor and Members of the Cit! City of Mound August 20, 1979 Page Two The revised proposal is feasible and is a more economical method of serving the lots in the area with sanitary sewer. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. L~le Swanson, P.E. LS:sc Enclosure #5178 Estimated Cost Cumberland Lane 'Storm Sewer Item 12" RCP Storm Sewer 15" RCP Storm Sewer Manholes Catch Basins Low Point Catch Basins Surface Restoration Contingencies Quantity 24 L.F. 320 L.F. 4 EACH 1 EACH 1 EACH LUMP SUM Estimated Total Construction Cost Estimated Unit Price $ 14.30/LF 16.50/LF 685.00/EA 765.00/Ea 5oo.oo/ Engineering, Legal, Fiscal & Administrative Costs Total Estimated Costs Total $ 343.20 5,280.00 2,740.00 765.00 500.00 800.00 1,050.00 $11,478.20 2,300.00 $13,778.20 Estimated Cost Cumberland Lane Street Construction Item Excavation Tree Removal Bituminous Base Bituminous Surfacing Concrete Curb & Gutter Driveway Entrances Turf Establishment Contingences Quantity 2200 C.Y. LUMP SUM 315 TONS 135 TONS 1080 L.F. 160 L.F. LUMP SUM Estimated Total Construction Cost Estimated Unit Price $ 3.80/CY 17.10/TN 18.85/TN 5.67/LF 6.00/LF Engineering, Legal, Fiscal & Administrative Costs Total Estimated Cost Total $ 8,360.00 1,500.00 5,386.50 2,544.75 6,123.60 960.00 1,500.00 2,650.00 $29,024.85 5~800.00 $34,824.85 Estimated Cost Cumberland Road Sanitary Sewer Item 8" Sewer 0 - 10' deep 8" Sewer 10 - 15' deep 3" Forcemain Manholes Break into existing Manhole Wyes Sewer Services Rock foundation material Contingencies Quantity 310 L.F. 50 L.F. 110 L.F. 3 EACH LUMP SUM 8 EACH 120 L.F.' 50 TON Total Estimated Construction Cost Engineering, Legal, Fiscal & Administrative Cost Total Estimated Cost Estimated Unit Price $19.75/LF 21.50/LF 9.00/LF 935.00/EA 500.00 38.50/EA 9.50/LF 6.60/TN Total $ 6,122.50 1,075.00 990.00 2,805.00 500.00 3O8.OO 1,140.00 330.00 1,350.00 $14,620.50 2,950.00 $17,570.50 Estimated Cost Cumberland Road Watermain Item Quantity Unit Price 6" Watermain 540 L.F. $13.20/LF Hydrant 1 EACH 715.00/EA Gate Valves 3 EACH 319.00/EA Water Service Groups 10 EACH 88.00/EA Water Services 200 L.F. 6.60/LF Fittings 500 LBS 2.20/LB Contingencies Estimated Total Construction Cost Engineering, Legal, Fiscal & Administrative Costs Total Estimated Costs Total $ 7,128.00 715.00 957.00 880.00 1,320.00 1,100.00 1,210.00 $13,310.00 $ 2,660.00 $15,970.00 Revised: August 21, 1979 -28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 16, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-300 SUBJECT: Mortgage Revenue Bonds The Council asked that Mr. Hanson of Miller Schroeder give them an update of the status of Mortgage Revenue Bonds. Mr. Hanson will appear at the August 28th meeting. Should the Council decide to go ahead with such bonds, a date should be established to consider the policy which must be established prior to issuing such bonds. % cc: Rob Hanson iL~a-~d ~. Kopp J iller & chroeder SUMMARY OF NEW HOUSING FINANCE LAW Laws of Minnesota, 1979, Chapter 306 The 1979 Session of the Minnesota Legislature removed from the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act the authority to finance housing of any kind. In its place they enacted a new statute, Minnesota Statutes Section 46ZC.01 et seq., authorizing the financing of single-family and multi-family housing, primarily for the benefit of families of low and moderate income. The following is a summary of the single-family and multi-family housing criteria of the new law, a discussion of what actions municipalities wishing to undertake housing finance programs must take to comply with it, and a summary of the transitional rules which allow some housing financings to take place under other statutes for a limited period of time. Single-Family Housing Criteria To Be Met Mortgage loans mast be made or purchased by a city for single-family homes located anywhere within its boundaries upon the following conditions: 1. The city must adopt a housing plan, as described below under "Actions To Be Taken." Z. The acquisition of both new and existing housing may be financed. Rehabilitation of housing may not be financed. 3. The adjusted gross income of the borrowers may not exceed the greater of (a) 110% of median income for the area, as calculated by HUD, or (b) 100% of the income limits for the area extablished by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA). For the first six months of each program, 50% of the money available for mortgage loans must be made available only to persons with adjusted gross incomes of less than 90% of the program's income limits. 4. Permitted adjustments to gross income are determined by adding $750 for each adult (maximum of two adults) and $500 for each dependent. 5. The maximum purchase price of a residence financed may not exceed three times the income limit described L-~ 3 above. 0. Any financial institution doing business within the city which is an approved FHA/VA or FNMA/FHLMC lender is eligible for consideration as a mortgage originator. Other financial institutions may be, but are not required to be, considered. A single lender may not be used unless a clear public purpose would be served, or unless only one lender is willing to participate. A lender may not participate if it has an outstanding commitment to MHFA, with less than 95% of the loans closed under that commitment. 7. The interest rate on the mortgage loans may not, at the time the city's bond resolution is passed, be less than the rate time being offered at that time by MHFA on its mortgage loans, Unless the Agency waives this requirement. $. Programs are prohibited in which one developer receives all the money, or in which mortgage loans are made for only one developer's housing. 9. Up to twenty percent of the aggregate amount of all loans provided under all of a city's housing programs may be provided without regard to income limits or net worth limits if: (a) the program will finance housing in either a development district extablished pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 47ZA. 03~ a redevelopment project established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 46Z.SZ1, or a development district established pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 458.191; or (b) the city has previously developed and administered a housing program for low and moderate income families, and the new program will be used to further policies of economic integration, Stability and revitalization of residential areas. 10. The aggregate principal amount of revenue bonds which a city may issue to finance both single-family and multi-family housing under the statute may not exceed $1,000 times its population for the first 50,000 persons, plus $500 times its population in excess of 50,000. Population will be determined using the last federal or state census (1970), except in the Twin Cities area, where Metropolitan Council estimates may be used if they yield a larger number. Actions To Be Taken In order to undertake single-family housing financings under the new law, a city must take the following actions and receive the following approvals: 1. Following a public hearing held after 30 days notice to the public, the city must adopt a general housing plan which sets forth: (a) the housing needs of the city and the data demonstrating those needs; (b) the plan of the city to meet identified housing needs, and the specific methods to be used to carry out the plan; (c) target areas, if any, of the city for each method; (d) the financing program or programs to be included in the plan~ (e) the number and qualifications of lenders eligible to participate in such programs; (f) the estimated amount of mortgage loans to be made or purchased in each program and the estimated amounts and timing of the sale of revenue bonds required to finance such loans, fund appropriate reserves and pay costs of issuance: (g) methods for monitoring the implementation by participants to insure that the programs will be consistent with the plan and its objectives; (h) the administrative capacity of the city to monitor and supervise housing finance programs; (i) the cost to the city, including administrative costs; ~) an analysis of how the programs will meet the needs of low and moderate income families in the city; and (k) maximum purchase prices or appraised values of single-family residences to be financed. Z. The city must suBm{~ {~s l~ous{n¢ plan ~o ~h~ ~I~oI~i~te ~e:i0nal development commission (or to the Metropolitan Council if it is in the metropolitan area). The commission or Council reviews and comments upon the pla~ within 45 days of submission. The comments are nonbinding, and no "approval" is required. 3. Each housing program (i.e., each bond issue) must be approved by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. The Agency must complete its review within 30 days of submission, or the program is considered approved. The Agency must determine: (a) whether the program furthers statewide housing policies; (b) whether the program will be implementated without material adverse effect on financing programs of the Agency, without subjecting the interest on future bonds of the Agency to federal income tax (this provision could become very imprtant if Congress imposes any limita- tion on the amount of housing bonds which may be issued in a state), and without exceeding the limitation on aggregate amounts of bonds the city may issue under the state statute; (c) whether the program provides for administrative and bond issuance costs that are reasonable; and (d) whether the program complies with all other requirements of the statute. Transitional Rules The six cities which presently have authority to finance housing under existing special laws (Minneapolis, St. Paul, South St. Paul, Duluth, Bloomington, Albert Lea) may continue to do so, provided that after January 1, 1980 all the provisions of the new statute shall apply to such financings. In the case of Moorhead, whose special law passed May Z1, 1979, the financing will immediately be subject to the income and purchase price limitations set forth above under "Criteria To Be Met." Any bonds issued by these cities prior to January 1, 1980 will not count against the aggregate bond limit described above. Multi-Family Housing Criteria To Be Met A city may make or purchase loans to finance multi-family housing developments located within the city on the following conditions: 1. A loan may be made or purchased for the construction of a new development, or for the acquisition and rehabilitation of an existing building. Z. A substantial portion of any rehabilitation costs must be incurred for compliance with building codes or conservation of energy. The cost of rehabilita- tion must be estimated to be at least $5,000 per dwelling unit, or 50% of the appraised value of the original building and site, whichever is less. 3. A loan may be made for either the construction or long-term financing of a development, or both. The acquisition of condominium dwelling units by purchasers may also be financed. 4. The use of revenue bonds is limited to the following types of multi-family developments, whether rental or for sale: (a) when at least Z0% of the units will be held for occupancy by families eligible for assistance under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act; (b) when the development is located within a redevelopment project area, a development district or an industrial development district~ or (c) when the development is designed for rental primarily to elderly or handicapped persons. 5. The limits on aggregate amounts of bonds which may be issued apply to both single-family and multi-family financings (see "Single-Family Housing - Criteria To Be Met") Actions To Be Taken In order to undertake a multi-family housing financing under the new law, a city must take the following actions and receive the following approvals: 1. The city must demonstrate need for the development or developments, describe the method of financing and state the applicable income limitations, if any. Z. The public hearing requirements and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency approval described above (see nSingle-Family Housing - Actions To Be Taken") must be satisfied. The city is not, however, required to adopt the city-wide housing plan, or to undergo the review and comment procedure with the regional develop- merit commission or Metropolitan Council unless they also intend to undertake a single-family program. Multi-Family Transitional l~ules Multi-family rental projects begun under the authority of the Iudu~trial Development Act may be completed trader that Act if approved by the Commissioner of Securities prior to April 17, 1979. Municipal they were -4- 8-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 21, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-308 SUBJECT: County Road 110 The County is planning reconstruction of County Road 110 north of Lynwood and are planning sidewalks for the street. Mr. Mike Mueller has asked to appear before the Council on August 28 to ask that a public sidewalk not be put in the area past his store. The present sidewalk between Tom Thumb and the Medical Clinic is on private property. As I understand it from Mr. Mueller, the County plans to acquire additional right-of-way and place a sidewalk on Public Property. Mr. Mueller says that he wishes to ask the City that the sidewalk stay on private property and the public walk not be built. cc: M. Mueller 8-28-7 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 21, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-305 SUBJECT: Mound Bay Park Parking Attached is a copy of a letter from Mrs. Valene Cornelius asking that the parking in the City's Mound Bay Park by the Community Center be discussed at the August 28th meeting. cc: Mrs. Cornelius Park Commission L. Kopp /~ Pleas~ considers- Lhis my request to hsw~ ~he attached lette~ read by each. Couacil memuer ar[or to the 8-28-7~ Mound City Council Meeting _b_~£~qE_q the Council members~ consider the four (4) alternatives put forth by Mr. Kopp in his Informa- tion Memorandum 79-92 (copy enclosed). ! further request that a fifth (~th) alternative be added to Mr. Kopp's list for the Council's consideration; that. being: ~. Close the lot to all.oarking except those using the Community~/[Center, by placing a small sign in the lot stating: "MOSND COY~IUNTIY CENTER PATRON PARKING ONLY"(enforcable by the Police).'~ Thank you. Yours truly, .. ~.~/.~- .... -~, .</ /'~/ .:- Valene T. Cornelius City Manager City Attorney Park Commission City Council s. Valene T. CorneYius Bartlett Blvd. ~iound, Minnesota ~4 August 20, 1979 Llear ~4irs: ul~'~ ~.'"ur. cit Nesting Information ~e..or.~.~u~.~ ',~ 79-92 - ~3UBJECT: kound Bay Perk Parking. To say' the least, I am am- ~n~ ~n experienced city offici~l could misconstrue~_~.~'v r~marks made to him .... ' ' 1919 and in two follow- and the City~ Council at their =oe~n~.. on Tuesday~ July ~,4 ~ ~ inL phons conversations with Mr. Kopp. At n~ time did I object to the use of the Mound Community Center Parking Lot ~ v . o~ ~p~ople other than r~hoss using the c~nt~r" (~ .~. park visitors~ %61at I objected to was its use by a c~rtain group of people who had bccn~ according to on~ of.th~ group's members~ "sen~ hsr~ by th~ Mound cops (sic.) f~om the ~,!ound Medical C~nter." This, after they had been harassing and abusin~ patients and employees of the Center for months with their foul lan- gusg[~ and threats of physical abuse to property and person. I had myself~ as told ~h~ Council, ~%hat evening~been called names by members of this zroup that ar~ unfit for any hand to print; and be~n threatened with a ~'Frisbee" that was at me from two directions; just inches from my hsad. This abus~ was heaped upon me because I was standing too near "their parking lo%.'~ At no time did I utter on~ word or sound to .~nz of them. They called ms the "Narc" lady (Narcotics Lady?) ~3[~ I ~d to ihs Council. ~is incident took place around' 5:00 or 6:00 P.~. on the same night as Zh~ Council Meeting, Tuesday, July 24, 1979, and I repcrt~d to the Mound police i~sdiately. ~lhey told me ther~ was not much they could do as they had not wiZn~ssed the occurrances. '.they said that at least one of th~s~ young adults is strongly suspected of trafficking in drugs; and, in fact~ has had his van "torn apart" by th~ polic~ on at least two occasions. Unfortunat~ly~ no concret~ ~vidence was found. This same fellow, I was to]d~ had recently assaulted a girl, who brought charges agains% him and took him to court. As a result~ he has been convicted and is now on probation. One more arrest~ I was %old~ and it's "the Workhouse" for him. I would hat~ 6o think that some innocent park or community cc:'nt.ar natron will have to be ihs unsuspecting victim~ who sends him there. If ~i1 of this information was given %o ms in order to comfort me with regard to th~~ constant presence of this group in a local Mound park~ wher~ children and adults alike swim and play daily, it did not. I understand~ further, that countless Mound residents ar~ aware of this group and the danger they pose to the general populace (i.~. any innocent victim who may hav~ the affrontry to pass in front of them or park next to th~m~ wherever they may choose %o loit~r~ b~ it public or private sector; e.g. the church parking lot next to the Mound Clinic). Apparently I made the horrendous mistake in believing that all to%~s, regardless of siz~ or location within %h~ United Suat~.~ of ~srica are ~ntit!ed, undsr the laws of d~mccracy, to be free from p~rsecution and abuse~ ns tho~of other cities such as New York, the are~ in which ! res~. I had th9 misccnceotion that trz~fic laws w~r~ n:~¢e to bs obeyed. ~.at for the sams group of yofan~[ adults rouse the ~'~ound Cosmunity Cant~r Parking Lot (unpaved an und~lineated a~3 it is) to pile into ~t raniom at unbe!ivably unsafe speed, blowin~~] the dust for blocks, ob * '~"~ s oruct~.,.~ traffic, screetchl:~7 tires, b.acking out cf the driveway onto ih:~ County Road into unsu;~- pectinf traffic, was af[ainst thc law and highly dan[~ercu~ both to those doin ~d..,. to those innocently driving:l, welkinD. and bikf~r..~:. .~ast- The fact that, according to ~'..~ Kop::'~s letter, "the ..... ~'i~ driving and the ~of.~m. from the persons the lot -. [ ' ~ au.~ren~y disturss Mrs. Ccrne!ius and her p~rcnts th8 most" i: sons, thin I would lik~ Mr, Kopp toao..u~'~ .... ...... ~, .... for me. H%s h,~, '~d~ ~n independent survey of the nei;~-hborhood and passing traffic to see on a scale of 1 to 10 how ~uch . s~,~oe~, by the presence of this group and %heir antisocial behavior? Perhaps Mr. Kop[: assumes thst since others haven't complained, it doesn't "' " ' ~ Would I be prosumptious : ~ssuming that perhaps otl~er feints, who have more .~ do r~lz~tna~ to complain ~savvy" about their loca ~wn ;.'over,hen% than I ~ .... ~'- ' tO the "representative" and salaried government officials of thoir town is a vain exercise? Considering the unsolicited praise I received last Sunday in a local Mound church from countless members, who had read about my "complain%" to the Council in "The Laker" con~ra.ul~tmnz me on haviny the z~ption to brine this serious matter before their local City Council~ on~ would assume that there arc other people who are also "bothered~' by this issue. Furthermore,_I did ~9~,_ as Mr. Weep.. : states in his letter .u;:~s% in that lot be limited to those usinf~, the Co,unity Center.': As a matter of ~'~''t, if you will check your minutad of the July 24th council.~eel/in~. .. you will z~"zna~ it was ~ir. Kopp himself~ after havinF~ heard my initial complaint, who su%;~[estod the ~osoibilit of parking" ' :.~.~__u~.._ ~ ~'sticker as he put mt, for this lot. '~is~ after a councilman stated that he himself felt something should be do~about this af.=a as he too had observed this situation on his own. I had not gone to the Coundil to ~l~ them what to do to solve the problem. I bad gone merely to ~vc evidence as to what %~as and ha~ been going on there for months; ~o make them aware of ~xisting and impending danger both to innocent park visitors and County Road users, in hopes that they, with their expertise, would want to know about and then attempt to solve this serious problem. On both occasions when I spoke to Mr. Kopp over the phone~ I specifically mentioned that if I had shy suggestion, it would be merely the plac- ing of a small sign reading: "Mound Co,unity C~nter Patron Parking Only" so that when the police checked out the area they would have reason to clear the lot of these undesirables. As is, their hands are tied because this is a park parking lot and all this group need do is grab a handy frisbee and pretend to be "park visitors" when the police show up. I have stated to Mr. Kopm again and again that no one objects to park users or Community Center patrons. ~at it is, in fact~ a real pleasure to watch and listen to them having a good time. Furthermore~ the idea of a chain is to me totally rediculous as I had told Mr. Kopp and totally unnecessary, so why he brinzs up the "possibility of a chain or something which cpuld be used to close the lot after ~ certain time , . . . which would necessitate hirin3[ someone to close the entrance at a certain time each day" is beyond ~at is totally unnecessary and uncalled for. I doubt that any Council would approve such a suggestion. Perhaps that is why Mr. Kopp has placed such strong emphasis cn this in his & point .program. In fact, all that is needed is the sign which would be enForcable by lsw. ~is would in all probability save the city money in the long run, as they wouldn't have to "hire" someone~ as *.hey do now to smooth out the deep ruts and disturbed earth of the lot every day, which is a direct · 'sult of the careless driving habits of this group of reckless drivers. ~erefore~. Mr. Xopp~s four alternatives for the Council to consider and vote upon are in my opinion totally unrealistic and unacceptable. I would simply ask that the Council vote on wheather or not a small sign (legally enforcable by the local police) could be placed in the Mound Co,unity Center Parking Lot stating "~ound Co,unity Center Patron Parking Only" so that thosa people who wish to use the facilities for their intended purpose could do so without risk. Yours truly, ~ Mrs. Valene T. Cornelius CITY OF HOUND Mound, Minnesota August 16, 1979 i?;FO_~ATION ~.~m~dOPJ\NL[k.I 79-92 SUBJECT: Mound Bay Park Parking At a past Council meeting, Mrs. Cornelius, the daughter of a family living across the street from the ComMunity Cente~ appeared before the Council objecting to the nse of the Parking Lot at the Community Center by people other than those using the Center. The Police do make stops at the lot, but can't be there all the time. The erratic driving and the noise from the persons using the lot apparent-. l~:di~turbs M~s~ Cornelius and her parents the most. Mrs. Cornelius has suggested that parking in the lot be limited to those using'the Community Center. The Council can limit parking which would mean posting the lot and, if the Council wished, a chain or something could be used to close the lot after a certain time. A chain would necessitate hiring someone to close the entrance at a certain time each day. The decision on what to do with the lot is a Council decision. The alter- natives seem to be as follows: t. Open and close the lot at a certain time each day. 2. Close the lot to all parking except t~ose using the Community Center. This could mean putting a chain across the entrance and then having the person opening the Center open the lot when they. open the Center and closing it ~]en they leave. 3. Keep it as is allowing park users as well as Center users to use the lot 4. Close the lot completely which does not appear to be a viable soluti6n. LLK/ms cc: P~rk Core,mission ~J4rs. Cornelius Police De£}ar tment 28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 24, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-311 SUBJECT: Parking - Community Center Attached is a petition requesting limited parking at the Parking Lot in the Community Center. Leonard L. Kopp' ~-'.,.-y~,~..~ RESTRICTED PARKING ON PARKIHG LOT FOR VIESTOH~ COM~U~IITY CENTER ........... '~ , ~ ~ ....... ~ . .... XXX)'~XXXXXXXXX Restricted parking on parking 1o~ fo~ L,/as~onka co~munFty Cant-ar .... ' ' - .... ~' x Bartla.tt Boulevard ~v~ ~x x.xxxxx,xxx~xx x,~x-~ ~ ~x~35~x 5.5~/x ~ x55 ?· c,~ .~'~x for 9peration o~ly during spec La l,.~,fu~[~ons,,:., of comm~ity Bu?Fd~ng',. ' .... C - - 7~'- . ' ~79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 24, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-316 SUBJECT: Construction on Commons In August of 1978, the Council authorized construction of a retaining wall on Commons with the stipulation the plans be drawn by a registered Engineer. Attached is a copy of a letter from the Applicant who wishes to discuss their problems with the Council. cc: Mr. & Mrs. Prouty August 24, 1979 Re: Resolution ?5-399 Dated - August 22, The delays caused by the stipulations and requirements of the city council of Mound have increased the cost of constructing a retaining wall on the commons by 25%. · We wish to discuss the current situation with the council members. Sincerely, ' . and Mrs. Phillip E. Prouty ~1 2933 Cambridge Ln. ~ / Mound, ~LN 55364 o-¥¢7. Councilmember Poslton moved the t:ollowin9 resoluLion, · RESOLUTION 78-399 Au§ust 22, t97 ~ESOLUI-ION I~A[ITIN6 COI'~i'ION5 MA IIffENAHtE PERi, IT5 ~fiffH THE STIPULATION THAT CONSTRUCT I OH PLAHS DE DRAWN BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER~AND CHECKED BY ~HE CITY ENGINEER WHEREAS, property abutting commons was badly eroded or v;ashed out during the heavy rains, and WHEREAS, said property owners have applied for maintenance permits for the rebuild- in9 of the damaged areas, and - · WHEREAS, property l~cated at 292.7 and'2933 Cambridge Lane and 4601 Island View Drive were damaged by the heavy rains and both residents on Cambridge Lane have applied for Maintenance Permits to repair retaining walls at these sites, and }IHEREAS, City Engineer recommends that any plans for rebuilding of retaining walls and stairs be drawn by a registered engineer and submitted to the City for approval before permits be issued. HOW, THEREFORE~' BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: ~ That Council does hereby grant a Commons Maintenance. Permit to residents of 2927 and 2933 Cambridge Lane with the stip- ula'tion that construction plans be drawn by a registered engineer and then checked by the City Engineer. The motion for the adoption of the foreg°in9 resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Fenstad, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor Lhereof: Fenstad, Lovaasen, Polston, Swenson and'Withhart, the follow- ing voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. AttestS/ City Clerk Mayor CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-303 SUBJECT: Driveway - 2160 Ashland Attached is a copy of a letter from the Engineer relative to L. Piepkorn's driveway at 2160 Ashland. In a conversation with Mr. Piepkorn, he has said that at one time the driveway was concrete. This item will be listed for discussion at the August 28th Council meeting. This driveway was before the Council about a year ago. At that time, the Council"directed the Engineer to handle the matter following the policy applied to similar situations". cc: L. Piepkorn McCombs-Knutson McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 August 16, 1.979 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound 1978 Street ImproVements Loren Piepkorn Driveway Dear Mr. Kopp: I have .just talked with Mr. Loren PiePkorn of 2160 Ashland. Mr. Piepkorn has a steep driveway and his car drags coming out to the street from the drivew.ay. Mr. PiePkorn feels that the only solution to this problem is to flatten the :driveWay. grade from his. garage to the street .and to blacktop the entire driveway. The driveway now has a crushed rock surface and we feel that we cannot authorize blacktopping this driveway without Council authorization. How do you wish to proceed on this. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:sc Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria- Granite Falls CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 24, 1979 COUNCIL MEMOPJLNDUM NO. 79-312 SUBJECT: Street Construction - Retaining Wall Attached is a request for a retaining wall on Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 11, Pembroke. Plans for a home have been submitted to the Building Inspector; usually the application for a building permit comes after the · Inspector approves the plans. According to the tax records, Lots 3 and 4 are owned by Harvey Reder and Lots 5, 17 and 18 are owned by Scott Holm. ~--'LeOnard L. Kopp cc: Engineer Building Inspector. CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE C~RTIFICAT~ OF SURVEY. 'LAND SURVEYORS EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 65~344-' Survey .For: STATE ~,l~G. NO. t~501ll -28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 21, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-309 SUBJECT: 1978 Street Project Attached is a copy of a letter sent Thomas & Sons, Inc. on August 21st. At the August 14th meeting, the Council asked that Thomas & Sons be termi- nated on August 24th. However, the contract requires he be given 10 days written notice and a list of things not done had to be made up. The "punch list" covers 29 pages. It is suggested the Council amend the resolution of August 14th in order for it to state 10 days after mailed notice is received by Thomas. Leonard L. Kopp ' ' ~ LLK/ms I.'.OUL~E;. "" T,'. f L. (612) ;7,'?.-! ':~6 August 21, 1979 Steve Thomas Thomas & Sons, Inc. 419 3rd Street Southeast Osseo, Minnesota 55369 Subject: City of Mound 1978 Street Improvements Dear Mr. Thomas: After repeated attempts to encourage you to get the work completed on the subject project, much of the work remains to be done. At a meeting on June 29, 1979 you agreed that beginning the following week you would complete the Punch List items, which were long overdue and very irritating to the residents, within three weeks; all blacktop would be done by July 6; walls and driveways by July 13; and sodding Three Points by July 20. Several weeks passed and no one was working on these punch list items and other progress was slow. As of this date none of the work is totally complete. Because of your failure to perform under the terms and conditions of the contract, you are hereby notified in accordance with Section 18.2 of the contract that if the remaining work is not completed within 10 days after receipt of this letter your contract will be terminated. The City will then proceed to complete the work as provided in the contract. To expedite your meeting this deadline, we are attaching a list of remaining work. In order that this action is not necessary, we once again urge you to assign sufficient men and equipment to the project to complete the work within the remaining 10 days. Very truly yours, CITY OF MOUND LK:jl Enclosure Leonard Kopp 28-79 CITY OF MOUSED Mound, Minnesota August 15, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-297 SUBJECT: Subdivision of Land Appeal Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 8, Pembroke The Council at their August 14th meeting tabled the subject sub- division of land request. The Planning Commission action on this request was to approve the subdivision with stipulation that all setbacks be met. This motion failed by a 5 to 3 vote for the following reasons: Lots too much undersized, like to see these 3 lots and neighboring 2 made into 3 conforming lots; do not feel applicant has exercised his options. The reasons given for the aye votes were that it was better to use the land and to put in services later would require digging up the new streets. The Council requested to know if additional land could be obtained and a letter was sent to the applicant (see copy attached). This will be listed on the August 28th agenda. --Leonard L. Kopp I ' Mr. Edward R. Stettin 4833 Island View Drive Mound, biN. 55364 Dear Ed: Your request to divide-Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 8, Pembroke came to the Council and was tabled since you were not in attendance. The Council wanted to know if additional land could be ob- tained and had other questions. This will be on the August 28th agenda and we hope you can attend. Sincerely, City Manager LLK/ms , ¥37 FEE OWNER ATION FOR SUBDIVISION OI~AND Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF. MOUND /.///PLAT PA"eEL i Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: -~,L ,, ~.i< 4~ o'r~ ZONING ,~'-I 65(~d~¢% To be divided as follows: q (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) AWAIVER INLOTSIZE 'SREOUESTEDFOR:~~e New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet APPLICANT ~ -'~'- "~ (signature) , Applicant's interest in the property: ff¢.~ ¢ This application must be signed by aIl'the OWNERS of the property, or ation given why this is not the case. ~'~ , PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE ~AYR LANE 8-28. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 21, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-306 SUBJECT: Commons - North Park Attached are: 1. A copy of the Park Commission minutes. 2. A copy of the survey of North Park. 3. Commons Dock Map. In the last paragraph of the minutes, the Park Commission asks: "Also requested that this be brought to the attention of Council for their meeting of 8-28-79. Question to be settled or opinion given, whether a dock permit can be given in an area designated "No Docking" and whether there is enough of Commons left, to be considered Commons or has erosion washed land claimed as Commons and now reverted back to private lakeshore?" The present dock location has no docks in th~s area. MOU SORY PARK COMMISSION MEETI August 9, 1979 Parks are People - Three Points Area Meeting held at Westonka Community Libra'ry Citizens present: John D..Eccles Rita Pederson Mr. & Mrs. Willette David Anderson Bert Norman 5112 Woodland Point(rep. N.W. Tonka Lions Club) 2390 Fairview Lane 5226 Lynwood Blvd. 1571 Finch Lane(Liaison Rep. Mound Jay Cee's) 1622 Gull Lane The meeting was opened by an introduction by Chairman Larson, with a brief back- ground on the Park Commission and how it originated. Members introduced themselves, Pat Shay, Cathy Bailey, Jori Lynott, Toni Case and Steve Hasek. Staff members in. attendance, Leonard Kopp and Chris Bollis. Shay gave.the slide presentation with commentary that included: Black Lake area., Avalon Park, Pembroke Beach, Doone Park, Chester Park and Chester Beach, Island Park Playground, with is one of our major parks under redevelopment, Wychwood Beach, Tyrone Park, with a permanent structure for use as warming house for winter skating' rink, Mound Bay Park, that has life guards and a swimming dock, Highland Park, Twin Park, Highlands, Ridgewood, Bluffs Tot Lot, which is undeveloped, also the Bluffs access to the lake, Woodcrest Outlots B and A, Indian Mound Park, Langdon Heights Park,which is behind the School Forest, Brookton Park, Belmont Tot Lot,by Harrison Beach, Harrison Beach, Edgewater Tot Lot, this is an area that residents saw a need for a park and it has posts on one side and fencing on the other to protect and guard against'vehicle traffic, Seton Park, with new basketball court, Carlson Park, which is used for fishing, mooring of boats and has a volleyball area, Avon Park, behind Burger Chef, Canary Beach, Three Points Park, classified as a major park and being developed according to the Long Range Plan, at present it is considered over- filled with dirt but will have to be leveled off, has a tennis court. HUD funds have been used for this upgrading, there will be drain tile installed plus additional equipment. Future planning has a warming house built that will be octagon in shape, have two stories, walkout type plus a hard surface area for games plus an access to the lake, that as of now needs cleaning up. After the slide presentation, there was a question and answer period. Question Answer Slides indicate a lack of maintenance in the pa~ks, why? Slides were taken.early Spring, When all par~s had not been cleaned up or mowed and there is a lack of personnel, Temporary jobs have'gone unfilled for this type of work. Suggestion by Anderson, the Jay Cee's have manpower and would be glad to help with any meintenance for parks, ~roviding'they are.given advance notice. Question Is the lake access on Three Points to be developed? Answer it will be cleaned up so that it is more accessible to area residents to make better use of it. Question Answer HUD money is being used for parks or is it lying dormant? HUD used for the drain tile but now HUD monies is restricted in its use and can no longer be used for parks. City has compromised with con- tractor, he can dump excess fi]] in the park but in excha,~ge, he has to rough grade or level the area. HOUND A. DVI. SOR. Y ~A.RK ISSION MEETING of 8-9-79 page two Question Northwest Lions Club quite perturbed that the old backstop they helped install has been taken down. Answer It was merely dismantled and stored while the work is being done in the park, will be installed again when project is competted. Suggestion by Eccles, Lions are interested in helping with Community Services and want to avoid the image they are sports oriented. They want to help the people and are interested in assisting with park projects, with donations of equip- ment, or whatever is needed. Question Answer Is the Park Commission in charge of the Commons? 'Park Commission is merely an Advisory Commission and as such can only make recommendations to Council, they have no regulatory power, Question How much'money comes from the State and/or County for Parks. Answer' HUD funds were-from the State but the City has used up those allocated to us. The City has a budget of $90,000.00 for Parks. Land and Water Conservation "LAWCOM" has funds available and City has requested a portion of these for developing Indian Mound area and Langdon Lake. If this is possible, 50% will come from Federal funds, 25% from State funds and the remaining 25% from the City. Metropolitan Council has to ap- prove plans but it has been suggested by LAWCOM that Langdon Lake be developed for park use and for small boats (row boats or canoes). With the end of the discussion pePiod, th~ meeting was brought to order. Mr' Kopp stated that Council has held off on the County Road 125 to Black Lake Bridge bike- hike pat'h, due to proposed construction, wanted to see how much thecountywould do. Mr. Willette brought up the question of dock on Commons on Harrison Bay. Channel leads to lake (Morton Ave.) and he doubts if there is 2 ft of commons left as most has eroded away. ' At this poi.nt in time, the library had to be locked up, and Chairman Larson asked that the meeting be continued at this point, to the meeting scheduled for Island Park Hall on the.23rd of August, when it would be heard. Also requested that this be brought to the attention of Council for their meeting of 8-~-/~. _~estinn opinion gsven, whether a___~dock permit can be given in-an ar~a designated No Dockij~g and whether ther~ Commons left, to be considered ~ommons or has ero. sion washed land claimed~ Commons and now reverted back to private lakeshore? Meeting ajourned. dd enc: .2 tlanm:p[n Count.y~ M:i~.n:,:,, 619.50/6750 13-117-24-31-oo70 · / / ! / ! l~'use 61950/6820 1 ~- 117-24-34-0017 .:. J o : *).',,-on rr~. rko. r Cordon E. Coffin ix~ng .~?. ke, Lot for sale ~-61950/6820 13-.117,24-34-00 House GORDON R. CO.-FI,, 4-12-79 i h~,:-eb! certt,."y that this is a t. ru-~ and correct repro:,;nt.~r, ion o[' a :~u~ey 0~' t~.~ bmmdario~ Lot only T~;~t part of ~ts 1 and 2, BLock 2~ and ~-bs 3 and L, Block 1, and of vacated ~,. ...... 3tract, and of tho vacated 12-foot all,~y as platted b~t.~ .... ~ts 1, 2, 3, 4, an~ L2 oF said Block 1, "Roarz-an~e~,~nt of' Block LO Abra}tam Lincoln Addi- tion to ~kenid~ Fork", Hennepin Co~ty~ M-'n. ~ ~ ~ ~uuoua, described as ill, ginning at the point of intersection of' tho" - ,~orthwest~rly line of said ~t 'Block 2, with a linc dra~n pmr~:!lei with 5nd 75 feet North of the North line. ~ A of said Block 2, as meas'~ed at right angles to said North line; th-3nc~ ~innin~ Northeasterly along the ~:orthwesterlI line of said Lots 2 and 1, Elock 2, ~ the most ~ortherly co.ar of said ~t 1; thence tanninz Southeasterly a!oag %h~ ~{ortheas%er!y line of sa~d Lot 1, Block 2, and its extension ~ ~ tn..reof, ~ the ~st Northerly co,er of said Lot 3, Block 1; thence continuing Southeasterly -along the ~:orth~:~sterly line of said ~t 3, Block 1, ~ a ~int which is feet Southeasterly from the most Northerly corner of said ~t 1, Block 2, ss measured alon~ the Northeasterly lin.~ of said ~t 1, Block 2, ,nd ~t 3, Block thence running Southwester~ 106 feet, ~nro or less, to ~ ~int ~n a line drawn .par.~!el with and 7~ feet North of the North ltn~ of ~t ~, Block 2, extended, rx~.n~ angl~s to said North line, '~ sa~,~ ~int also being 15 feet as r. easurcd at right angles from the E~st line o~ imurel Street; thence r~nning W~s5 pzr~llel with the North lin9 of s~id Lot ~, Block 2~ ~ the ~int of beginning; House ' And that p~,rt of Lots 2, [4 and 4~ Block 2~ and o~ w~ted ~urcl Stre:.~ '~Hearran~emont o~ Hloc~ lO Abreh~ L~ncoln Addition ~o ~.~eside Par~"~ H~nnepin Co,mtn, Minne.~ob~ descr~t~d ~s foltowa: Be~tnnin~ ~t ~ ~int in the E~t ~n~ of s~.d ~t A~ which ~tnt ts 20 ~eet South o~ tho ~o. th lfn~ o~ snid ~t /~ ~asu~ed at r~h~ ~ngl:.~ to s~id North lin~:; thence ~aanlng W~t p~r~ilel with th~ ~;orth line o~ said ~t 4 to the W~t ltn~ o~ ~ld l~t ~; thence ~:orth~st~rly slong the .,o~ ~hw~rl~ line ~ai~ ~ts ~ 3~ and 2 to a which ~s ~5 fee~ North of the North lin~ o~ sa~d ~t & as m~asured at right anzl~s to s~id I~orth ltn~; thence r,~nnin~ E~st ~arallel ~ith the North l~n~ of' s~id Lot ~ ~ a p~tnt in th~ c~nt~rlln~ of vacated ~urei Street; thence r~mnln~ Southerly ~lon~ safd centerline a distance o~ 96 ~eet; thence running Southue~t- erl~ ~ ~ ~nt which ts 5 ~eet ~st of the ~s~ line o~ ~a~d ~t /~ as me~s~ed rtl.n., angles to sa~d ~t line~ and 20 feet~ South o~ the North lfne o~ saf Lot A, extended, ~ ~a~ed at right angles ~ sa~d ~orth line~ thence r ~e.,~ parallel w~th the North line o~ s~id ~t ~, eztended~ ~ the ~int o~ and the location of all e~sting buildings thereon. It .does nob purport to show other :].~,D.O.;eI..~nt.> or encroachments. Scale: 1" = 50' ,.'~ tc : 4-12-79 0 ' ~ron Gordon.,.~' Coffin H,~'/. No. 6(~$4 Alvin R. Rehder Reg. No.13295 Land Surveyors and Pl~nn:,rs Long Ix~ke, Fgm~esot~ -25'30 8-28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 24, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-315 SUBJECT: Request for Refund of House Moving Permit Fee Attached is a copy of a request for the refund of House Moving Permit from Eric Bodine. He originally made application to move an undersized house onto Lots 1 and 15, Block 13, Dreamwood. eonar~ . opp CITY OF MOUND N°- GENERAL RECEIPT FORM ~o. 4 S -.5~o ,%0 ""-" DOLLARS (ClT/CLERK--TREASU R E R) '/ Co a. .../ ' ~1. q o-7' -28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 9, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79- 298 SUBJECT: Gambling License - VFW Attached is a copy of an application for a Gambling License for the VFW Post 5113. The application was made on July 18th, so no action can be taken until after August 17th (30 days) according to the ordinance. ~/--~rd L. Kopp . Fee: $75.00 Annual Permit $15.00 Single Permit CITY OF MOUND blound, Minnesota APPLICATION FOR GAMBLING PE~4IT Name of Orga~iization applies for a t a Address organization, hereby gambling permit. annual/single occasion Date to be usea / Phone Number of OrganizatiOn Date Organization was organized Purpose of Organization - r~%~W~,~ ! Type of Gambling to take place: Paddlewheel Yes No ~ Tipboard Yes ~/~ No Raffle Yes V No Location of Gambling: Address: P d s."f Name of Building Ownerd~t~.~ ~ ~ Is the building owned or leased by the organization Date ownership was acquired /~ I~ leased, expiration date of lease (Copy of lease must accompany application) Gambling Manager: Name of Gambling Manager~'-"~l//~('2~( ,<:~]~;/~_ '~.~-~ .~'~_ ~.~~:~ Home Address ,t~ ~ ~ 0 .. ,~. ~1~':~%~. 'P~ ~ IIome Phone Is Gambling Manager an active me~3er of organization Date membership acquired Is Gambling ~4anager paid by the organization for handling the gambling (The answer to this question.must be no - Sec. 43:40) (Required) Amount of bond furnished by Gambling Manager. Name of Company furnishing Bond ~2~.~:,~_ . ~ /~1 ' · , . _~¥~_ agree to file a copy of the bond' with the tity Clerk. Name of Bank where gambling funds will be kept Bank Account Number for gambling funds <~'~ ~ (At least $10,000.) and we Are funds in the above account mixed with other funds (Answer must be "No") AGREEMENT The ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~//~ here~y agree~hat if the ~license herein' is Name of Applicant '~'~ ....... ~" ~ granted that the ~ ~_~_. ~/~ ' ~i~ will Save the City, its officers and Name of Applicant agents harmless against any claims or actions and the cost of defending any claims or actions arising out of or.by reason.of the granting of the license or the conduct of any of the activities authorized by the license. It is further agreed that monthly reports shall be furnished the City by the Gambling Manager as directed in the ordinance and the //~//Z,---/[/~, /'30~/' ~ /./t~ . Name of Applicant hereby authorizes the Bank .named above as the keeper of gambling funds to allow the City access to the figures and activity of account number listed above. Signed by authorized Officer of Organization d/~-'""~~.~//.,~i~~~~~. ,Title ~~.~' ~ The above application is made on behalf of the and all information given herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and . ~/ ' Annual Licenses: Expire on Januar~l of each year. Fees are not prorated for licenses purchased after February 1. C1TY o'f MO £ TIND 5341 ,,.A'~ ~,iO ..... r~OAO MOl.!~'~5), ,",!II'iNE,~->L):'~ 55364 (~i12) 4'~'J tt55 August 3, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Charles Johnson - Chief of Police Gambling License Application for VFW Post 5113 Please be advised that the police department is aware of no information that would tend to show that the VFW Post gambling license application should be denied. Approval is recommended. Respectful ly, Charles 'aohnson Chief of Police CJ:lao COMPREHENSIVE DISHONESTY, DISAPPEARANCE AND DESTRUCTION POLICY--FORM A FI DEL TYAND DEPO SIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND A STOCK COMPANY-ESTABLISHED I890--BAkTIMOR~ (Itcreln called the Company) IATIONS Fame of Insured (herein called the Insured): CtlAMBERLAIN-GOUDY VPW POST NO. 5113 .rlnCipal Address .~_ _2_~?._~.._~..q~.~.r.C.._O.._ .B_..1...~.~~.:. ......... ...~_o..~. ,H..~. .......... ..H..~_n..~.~..n,_ ......... No. Street City County State 'olicy Period: from noon on Sepgember 1~ 1977 to .oon o,, the e~ave da~ Month. Day Year f the cancelation or termination of this Policy, standard time at the Principal Address as to each of said dates. NSURING AGREEMENT I ...... NSURL~G AGREEMENT II ...... NSURING AGREEMENT III ...... NSURI.~G AGREE~iENT IV ...... NSURLN'G AGREEMENT V ...... added by endorsement: ssum~o AG~ ...... NSURINO ~GREEMENT ...... NBURINO ~OREEMEN? ...... ' Table of Limits of Liability' Employee Dishonesty Coverage ................................ Loss Inside the Premises Coverage .............................. Loss Outside the Premises Coverage ............................ $ -- Money Orders and Counterfeit Paper Currency Coverage .......... $ -- Depositors Forgery Coverage ................................... $. ?he liability of the Company is subject to the terms of the following endorsements attached hereto: Bl1256a B636 F631 B5278 B5279 7he' !ns.red by the acceptance of this Policy gives notice to the Company terminating or canceling prior bond(s) or pollcy(ies) 56 ~9 881 Co.(s) ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. uch termination or cancelation to be effective as of the time this Policy becomes effective. A'uthorized Representative 720; 50~724)--15M, 2-7~ )ctober. 1953 February I, 1975 202516 CDDDP-(A) Page 1 of 6 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-304 SUBJECT: Licenses - Restaurant & Cigarette - Hope's Bar-B-Q The new owner of Hope's Bar-B-Q (formerly the Koffee Kup) has made application for a restaurant and cigarette license. CITY OF I',{OUND ~Iounct~ Minnesota Momnd, }.iN. 55364 Phone 2-1-79 Cigarette. Licenses are due March 1, 1979 $12.00 Please bring or send to Mound City Office, 5341 Maywood Road, by Thursday, February 8, 1979, Thank you.- CODE OF ORDINANCES C~.ty of Mound, Minnesota August, 1960 Chapter 37 - Licensing and Regulation of Certain Sales Part A Cigarettes, Cigarette Wrappers, Cigars, Pipe Tobacco, Cigarette Tobacco, Snuff, Chewing Tobacco Section 37.04 Restrictions No such licehse shall be issued except to a person of good moral'character. No li'cense sh~ll be issued to any applicant at any'place other than his estab- lished place of business. No license shall be issued for a vending machine for the vending of cigaretteS, cigarette wrappers, cigar, pipe or cigarette tobacco, snuff or chewing tobacco, except' that such vending machine be located in such place where persons.under the age of. 18 years are prohibited from entering.. No person, except a bona fide and duly licensed and registered pharmacist or physician shall keep for sale, sell or dispose of. in any form any opium, morphine, jimson weed, bella donna, strychnia, cocoaine, marijuana, or any deleterious or poisonous drug except nicotine. 3,¥2.0 FEB $5.0O CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywoofl Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 LICENSE APPLICATION RESTAUP~ANTS, CAFES AND PUBLIC EATING HOUSES (1) Name of Owner of Business _.~~-~ (2) Name of Business .~J/~ / .~ ~~P~ ~ ~ J~_'.. Street City State Zi~ / (4) Does anyone other than above have financial interest in the business?. ~.~[ * Section 37.10 License Required. That all Restaurants, Cafes and Public Eating Houses shall secure a license to operate, from the City, which license shall run for one year, and be signed by the City Clerk. The license fee shall b~ $5.00 and said ~icense shall expire annually on April 30. (Revised - Ordinance 397 Feb. 27~ 1979) If the answer to Item 4 is "Yes , please list others ~aving a financial interest interest in the business below on this application,.giving name, address and telephone number. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 14, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-299 SUBJECT: Community Action Agency Attached is a copy of information received on a County Community Action Agency. The last item in the packet is a proposed resolution supporting the forma- tion of the agency if the Council wishes to act on it. August 10, 1979 Mr. Leonard Kopp, C. M. 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MNo 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp: During the past year there has been much discussion and study at the state, county and local levels about the establishment of a CAA in suburban Hennepin County. On June 5th, the Hennepin County Board passed two resolutions regarding a suburban CAA: {1) to approve in concept the establishment of a CAA; and (2) to direct the Suburban Human Services Councils to develop a model for the CAA, and return it to the County Board for their approval early this fall. The Human Services Councils were further dir- ected to seek participation of area human services agencies, community groups and low-income residents, and also to seek municipal support for the model. A Task Force composed of persons representing the munici- palities, human services councils and representatives of the poor from the three suburban planning areas has been working to carry out the above directive. We have prepared the attached resolution to be presented to your City Council by August 20th, or shortly thereafter. We are also including an information packet containing: 1. Mission Statement for CAA 2. Minnesota State Plan for Counties without CAA's The Model that has been developed by the Task Force 4. Statement of Need q/7 -2- We will be contacting you soon to find out when this resolution can be scheduled for presentation. A member of the Task Force could be present at the meeting to answer any questions the Council might have. Sincere ly, Patti Be tlach Chairperson, WHHS Board INNESOTA STATE PLAN FOR COUNTIES WIIHOUY' COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES About 10% of the poor in Minnesota, estimated to be almost 42,000 people in 1978, live in six counties which do not have Conmmunity Action Programs. A consortium of Community A~tion Age ~cies which are contiguous to, and provide some services in these counties have joined with the Office of Economic Opportuniny, Minnesota Department of Economic Security, in sponsoring a study to determine the ~easibility of designating these counties as participants in Community Action Agencies. Designation as a Community Action Agency participant, which can occur~upon request of the County Board of Commissioners, and recognition of CSA, Region V, allows the full resources of the Community Action Program to be brought to operate in the interest of ~.. the poor residents of these counties. °A.feasibility study was.completed in November, 1978. It identified the needs of people in the-six counties, the services that are available to meet those needs, and the · problems that exist where services fail to meet~needs. (Attachment A) : The study was distributed to each of the counties~ and discussions were held with Human Service Boards, full boards of county commissioners, and other interested groups of people. One county, Washington County, did not wish to move any further with the study, but the other five have been working with it and are in various stages of development. .~ Hennepi. n County accepted the study and .passed a resolution that their Office of Planning and Development study it further and bring back !o the County Board their recommenda- tion. On May 31, 1979 the Office of Planning and Development submitted their recommenda- tions to the County Commissioners Ways and Means Committee. (Attachment B) The recommendations progressed to full board on June 5, and two resolutions were .passed at that time. 1) to recommend concept approval of a Community Action Agency to serve suburban Hennepin County. and 2) to recommend the Suburban Human Services Councils develop a model for such a Community Action Agency and return it to the Board by September 1, 1979~ for final approval'and designation. (Attachment C) Olmsted County Board of Commissioners met on May 1, 1979, and discussed the feasibility of establishing a Community ActJ. on Agency. They are still grappling with organizational and administrative issues and assigned the Assistant County Administrator for Human Services to study these issues and return to them with pertinent information. Dakota County will .study Community Action in depth in September through their Human Service Advisory Committee. When this study is completed they will move their consid- eration to the Human Service Board, (County Co~missioners) Freeborn & Mower C0untx have reviewed the stud>' and have expressed an interest, instruct- ing their Welfare Directors to report to them om the possibilities of forming a C~\. It is estimated that the progress of each county will move according to the schedule outlined in table I ~ith Community Action Program designations ranging from November,. 1979 to May, 1980. STATEMENT OF NEED There is a need for a Community Action Agency in Suburban Hennepin county because: - there is not accessibility to currently available services - there is a lack of knowledge about available services -many agencies in the area are underfunded and are not able to meet the needs - many people do not use serivces available to them because of pride and could be educated about using services through aC.A.A. - there are gaps in services available - there is a substantial number (25,000) of poor and near poor people who would live in suburban Hennepin County and could benefit from the services of a Community Action Agency - there is a large number of poor people who are not visible in our communities because there are not concentrated geographic "pockets of poverty" - there is not a group or organization which can speak to the needs of poor people in suburban Hennepin County, and because: - a Community Action Agency could improve access - identify people who are poor - further clarify needs - involve people who would benefit in the development and implementation of programs - work on the prevention of negative effects of needs being unmet or ignored - could add to the resources of currently underfunded services weft h~nn~pIn human t~iVlc~;, plonnln9 boald 4100 park, P.~.RT£CULAR CONCERNS FOR LOW INCOMEii.iRE. S~DENTS OF~ SUBURBAN '.AND RURAL "::~:~ : HENNEP;N COUNTY HOW A COMMUNITY'ACTION AGENCY/COULD ADDRESS THESE CO~;C'.RNo ............ LJ~ -'- ~ L~CK OF COOrDiNATiON .OF SE~ViCE~,~-,_L~CK. OF ENO~LEDGE-DD EX~BTI~O;' .: S~RVICES; ~O CONCENTRATED FOCUS :'ON.'. LOW INCOME PROBLEMS. ..... -' ';-v:;.. -'. - .:.~:~'--:~ ;, .'- ' ' llthough ~ul~t~le services exis~ ~ se~v~ suburban.and ~u~al ~esidentS, a great many poor people do not know what is available or now to get 'needed assistance. In the first four months of' 19~9, Community Emergency Assistance Programs {CEAP} in Brooklyn~Center saw 1296 low .~: ~ncome ~].ients; ]74 of t~ese had never had any contact with community-.. based services and at that time were receiving no care or services of any kind. The problem is worse in more isolated rural parts of the county; Emergency Energy volunteers saw many clients with heal,h, housing, and other needs but had no idea of where or how to apply. The poet in suburban Hennepin tend to be isolated, elderly, an4 unused to soc~si service systems. ~ Conmuni~y Act.i. on Agency could: most importantly, prepare' a .c,.omprehensive needs assessment to -~etermine the most crucial problems facing low lncome people a:':~ develop prioritized strategies' for combattin~ thos~ problems. * ou '~ central coordinating agency and resource center for Iow i~ c~.'rz~ residents, and a place where people could beaom.~ a~t~ve L¥ involved in programs affecting them. provide outreach advocacy, and t'ollow-up throughout the area v~si'Jn~ resident.s, asgz.'-~ting them with problems and concerns, provJ.JLng +'hem ~it.h locaJ programs to get involved in {~o example, nutrea~h workers ca,41d exp.l_ain ~o a home~ouna e.]der].y person now no apply for' ..'-~ed~.are benefits as well as gett~ ng them home r'e~,~ir servzces or- del:~vere~ hot me, la} . ¥/3 TRANSPORTATION AND ACCESS TO SE~']!CES Lack of transporroation and r~;sulti~.g isolation are key problems in su~urbar~ and rura[ Hennepin County people on fixed ~n~omes can't afforc ~abs and often ~on'~ h~ve nars; and distances are ~oo far to wa A Community Action Agency could: III . * mobilize local churches and civic organizations to p~-'ovide volunteer transportation systems, car pools, * provide regular help in .... .~ettin~- people to services. * advocate for'~reater-decentralization f~or area- residenr, s benef~ t . * provide outreach workebs to visit isolated elderly, and home-bound residents. ISOLATION, SENSE OF COMMUNITY, AND SELF-HELP · A problem related directly to the lack of adequate transportation is the isolation and sense of helplessness people experience living alone in. poverty. (The stigma and shame attached to being poor are strong in suburban Hennepin County.) Community Action Agencies work to bring these people together, develop a sense of community, and help people help themseives. A Community Action Agency could: through outreach and referral, get people ~n touch with needled services and with each other. * through providing better transportation, arrange for seniors and neighbors to get together socially and for projects such as .c,ommun i t y ~.a .r.d .en s. * start senior volunteer pro~rams for minor home repair, help with househo id chores, etc. * help start food co-ops, community gardens, open air markets. * help start support groups f. er single parents or other groups the community. * through such programs, develop leadership .~kills and a sense of pride and belonging to re'place stigma, shame and isolation. IV. INADEQUATE HOUSING A large number of suburban Hennepin poor people live in homes t:..at they own but that are substandard, ~n extreme need of repair' w~h they cannot afford. In home visits for the emergency energy pre,gram, we saw leaking roofs, flooding basem~nots~ broken ~indows, no or inadequate insulat~o~. A Community Action Agency could~ * provide winterizati, on p, rograms for insulation and storm * provide repair services to bring houses up to code. * provide e~er~ency energy assistance in home communities to assist with high fuel costs. ....¥ ................ . ..... * help people learn basic skillS of home repair~and get "t~'her~' in t-~uch with community resources such as iow interest loans HEALTH AND I'IUTRITION NEEDS I~adequate nutrition an~ health often intensify poor people's problems because they make it more difficult for people to work at optimum levels and provide for their daily needs. This probIem affects young and old alike; but children in early developmental stages and elderly residents seem to be most vulnerable. A Community Action Agency could: * provide services such as congregate dinin.5 and home delivered meals to sen~ors where they do no~ presently exist. * establish nutrition education programs. * help organize well baby and senior prevention clinics. * he~p publicize government and private sector heal~t~ and nutrition programs. * help organize food shel;~es and clothing shelves where they not currently exist. * help provide local residents with cheaper nutritious food thro,~gh foo~ co-ops, community gardens, open air markets. * advocate for school feeding programs and provide n:~tri~ion~?.l supplements--through Hea~ S~tart programs for young ch~Inr~n. VI. SPECIAL NEEDS: CHILDREN; YOUTH; SINGLE PARENTS Some age groups face special problems and needs caused by poverty. Children may benefit from special education and nutrition programs, and from better child care services. Youth may benef'it from special youth empYoyment and recreation progra..ms. Single parents, displaced homemakers, can benefit from 3ob counseling, child ~mprovements, support groups, an'J similar services to ass[st Lhem tr: become self-supporting after divorce, death of a spouse, or a zimilar si tua ~:ion. " A Community Action Agency could: , * help provide better, more, and affordable child care and latchkey programs, particularly Head Start programs, which benef'it both. * provide' job programs, or outreach and referra'l'-to.e, xisting .... programs, especially for youth and women first en. terzng the job . mark,et '".' " "' -~ prov-' ' you recreation p~ograms . * provid~ well baby clinics~ nutritional an~ health classes for young mothers. : - * organize support ~roups for single parents and working motherz. VIi . SUMMAP. Y Clearly, a new Community Action Agency could not address all of the above needs at~ once. Its initial concern should oe tc condu~ot a care: ,st, udv of ~hose needs which are most crucial and affect the m. os~ and develop programs to address critical needs first. Further, a Community Action Agency must take care to avoid duplication and to utilize a.iI available community resources, particularly churches and vclunteer organizations in the local areas. Mission Staterner The primary objectives of Community Action Agencies (CAA) ara to mobilize and channel the resources of private and public organizations and institutions into anti-poverty action, to increase the opportunities as well as the capabilities for participation of the poor in the planning, execution, and evaluation of programs affecting their lives, to initiate new and more effective means to the solution of p_overty, problems, and to strengthen communications and mutual understanding in the planning and coordination of anti-poverty programs in the CAA service area. These objectives will be discussed in detail to more clearly define the role of Community Action Agencies as society's number one anti-poverty organization. 1. Mobilizing and channeling resources into anti-poverty action--Community Action Agencies have been established to serve the poor by assisting in the development of all programs possible and needed for each agency's service area. The idea behind developing a more useful utilization of resources for anti-poverty programming throughout the country is not to provide monetary handouts to alt Iow income people but to increase their chances of becoming eccqomically independent, thus reducing the actual number of Iow income people in the country. 2. Encourage participation o! the poor--One of the major goals of the Community Action Agency is to provide the opportunity for poor people to structure their own development toward becoming economically independent. The basic idea behind this goal is that iow income people must be given the opportunity to shape fheir own dest:.ny, although some guidance is ~equired to make this development as easy as possi.ble. All programming efforts of the Cornmur~ity Action Agency at some time in the planning process include ~nput from the service area's Iow income population. Low income individuals participate in all administrative functions of the CAA 3. Develop innovative anti-poverty programming--Community Action Agencies have been given the respons~l:)ility to discover new methods of an!i-.poverty programming and implementing such programming when possible. The Community Action Agency is unique in the i'act that it is one of the few government agencies that deals directly with the people at a local level. Because of the CAA's proven ability to deal on a one-to-one basis With Iow income people, they can. more ea~;ily adapt the service area's population to new programming. Community Action Agencies over the year.$ have become one of the best organizations at researching and imp!ementing innovative progr&ms &lined at the reduction of poverty throughout the United States. 4. Develop a coordinated eflort to deal with problems related to poverty--The fact that Community Action Agencies at times becon'.~e a sounding board for all the problems associated with anti-poverty programming only strengthens its role as advocate to the poor. Community Action Agencies have taken on the responsibility of defendm0 each person's right to utilize the service~ provided by the government in the manner they were meant to be used. Any discrepancy in the way the government services are delivered versus the way they should be delivered becomes one of the more important principles behind the well-established communications network developed by each CAA. This communication network is often used, but not only to defend the rights of the Iow income person but to mutually develop anti-poverty programs, and simply share ir, l'ormation and ideas concerning the Iow income sector of our populatiOn. It becomes increasingly apparent that not only does a Community Action Agency mobilize private and public resources, encourage participation from Iow .income individuals, develop and implement innovative programs and help coordinate all anti-poverty programming in the agency's geographic service area; it provides all people, not only Iow income people, with some kind of voice in the bureaucracy of government. Although this mission statement more clearly defines the role of the Community Action Agency, it does not cover everything. Community Action is a continuing ongoing program that expands to meet the needs as they arise. Minnesota Poverty Policy The State of Minnesota is cornmitted to the principle that alt citizens are entitled to participate In the quality of life so often attributed to this State. The. Office of the Governor and at; State Dep~rtments and A.qencies will serve as a positive force to eliminate social and economic barriers and to provide opportunities for the poor and disadvantaged to pursue and enjoy self-sufficiency and self-determination. This quality of life goal means that the poor and disadvantaged citizens will have-- .' -the opportunity to bbtuin an education and to develop career skills; -tJ',e opportunity to choose work at the prevailing ,','age and to have ap adequate an;~uai income; -~ccess to adequate housing, energy sources, health care and food supply; -the guarantee of human and individual rights. The ,State shall establish policies which v,,ill encourage :he private sector, local units of government and all citizens to commit resources an;d actively participate in the elimination of poverty in IM innesc~ta 9~ ~2 ~dOOd _dO ~,A II VI N ~$_a~d~i~ S-lVOId.dO DIII~FId A_LNIIOD 'NN3H I ,INVg_L NOI_L~NICIi~OOD VVD ,4 V, NARRA'riVE DIAq.~iAM I - Exist~n;~ ~le-!ationship of H,iman Services Councils to Hennepin County and the S~burban Municiealities The Human Services Councils have been designated by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to be the local agencies responsible for human services planning and coordi~ation in their ~,espective suburban planning areas. Each council operates under a joint powers ag[cement of their member municipalities and has officially appointed representatives of the municipalities on their Board of Directors, and each receives some funding from the member cities. Hennepin County provides a basic yearly grant to the Suburban Human Services CounciIso In addition to the municipalities shown on the chart, the planning areas of the Councils also include all townships within the borders of suburban Hennepin County. Thus, the Suburban Planning Councils collectively are presently serving all of Hennepin County, excluding the City of Minneapolis. DIAGRAM II - The CAA Relationship to the Hennepin County Board and the Human Services Councils The CAA will be private, non-profit, and designated by the County Board to serve the poor and near poor of suburban and rural Hennepin County. The CAA will have authority over all CSA funding and CSA funded programs for the poor and near poor. The CAA will contract, almost exclusively, for all programs and program activities, with the most appropriate agencies in the co mmuni ties. There has been a consensus by the Hennepin County Board and the suburban municipalities that the HSC's, because of their present role in community-based human services planning, would be the appropriate community groups to carry out the planning, outreach and community organizing functions of the CAA. Other benefits derived from this linkage are: {1) The contract would link the CAA and ~;'~e HSC in a coordi- nated and collaborative effort, minimizing fragmentation and duplication; (2) The municipalities would have better opportunity to relate to the program activities of the CAA; (3) The CAA could more effectively utilize the planning network of agencies and human services providers which is already in place through the HSCo Because of the special relationship between the HSC and the CAA, there will be a provision in the by-laws regarding the role and relat'ionship between them. In addition the by-laws will designate procedures for the monitoring, evaluation and renewal of the HSC contracts. Each of the HSC will have advisory committees composed of representa- tives of the poor from their respective areas, according to CSA guide- lines. There will be non-voting liaisons from each of the HSC to the CAA Board, selected by each HSC; and, the CAA Board will appoint non- voting liaisons to each HSC. The role of the liaisons will be to foster coordination and communication. DIAGRAM III - Relationship of the CAA Board to the Hennepin County Board and the HSC A. Public Officials A total of 9 public officials will be appointed to the CAA for 2 year terms by the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. A minimum of 3 nominations for these positions will be submitted by each of the HSC to the Commissioners. The County Board may reject any of the nominees and add appointees on their own i ni tia tive. B. Private Sector A total of 9 private sector representatives will be appointed by the CAA Board for 2 year terms. Each HSC will nominate 3 agencies or organizations from their area, which meet the eligibility requirements for the private sector, as outlined in the by-laws. The CAA Board may reject any nominations and initiate additional appointees. C. Representatives of Poor A minimum of 9 representatives of the poor will be elected for 2 year terms. 1/3 elected from each planning area. The election process will include the follo~ing: -- nominees - residents, eligible under CSA guidelines. -- voters - residents, fall within CSA poverty income guide- lines, must attest that the above is true at time of'voting -- nominations submitted by qualified voters to office before elections -- elections at set time at various sites, monitored by persons designated by Board -- written ballot The HSC will administer the election process in their respective planning areas, as provided Jn the CAA by-laws. (As with all delegated responsibilities, this activity will be monitored'and evaluated according to CSA regulations and CAA Board guidelines.) DIAGRAM IV - Relationship of CAA Staff and HSC Staff The CAA will be staffed by two full-time persons initially. (1) An Executive Director (2) A full-time Clerical/Bookkeeper In order to ensure coordination of planning, outreach and community organizing activities, the Executive Director of the CAA will chair a coordination team, composed of the HSC directors. This team functions as a consulting body and is responsible for coordination of programs and services for the poor and integration of those programs and services with the total range of HSC activities in suburban and rural Hennepin County. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CAA FOR SUBURBAN AND RURAL HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the question of whether there is a need for a CAA to serve suburban and rural Hennepin County, and what organi- zational form is most appropriate if a CAA should be esta~ blished, has been under study for the past year, and WHEREAS, this review has indicated that the County's lower income citizens will benefit from the establishment of a CAA that can build on and complement the activities of the existing Human Service Councils, and WHEREAS, a task force representing the three Human Service Councils has developed an organizational model designated the "Link- age Model", which will enable a CAA to be organized while retaining the Human Service Councils and making the fullest use of their existing planning, management and service capa- bilities, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby urge the Hennepin County Board of Com- missioners to accept the recommendations of the task force and establish a CAA for suburban and rural Hennepin based on the "Linkage Model" and to designate the present task force as the interim board to: write the by-laws, organize the new board, and apply for funding. Adopted this day of 1979. Signed ATTEST: CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 22, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-310 SUBJECT: ~UD Grants The Council has established by resolution using $7,500 as top income for persons receiving grants for home rehabilitation. At this time, $5,000 is the top income for persons who can receive HUD money for diseased trees or special assessment help. It is recommended that $7,500 be established as top income for those receiving diseased tree and special assessment grants. L. Kopp ~ ~' !- 8 -79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 21, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-307 SUBJECT: Red Cross Agreement The Red Cross wishes to receive agreements with each City for a building to establish emergency headquarters in time of disaster. We are suggesting the City Offices be established as such headquarters. If the Council is agreeable, the Mayor and Manager should be authorized to enter into the agreement. L. Kopp ' - I ; STATE ,[ENT OF AGREEM Z NT CONCERNING THE USE OF ACILITIES AS SHELTERS BY THE . lnneap01is Area Chapter, American Red Cross. This agreement is made and entered into between the governing board of the . ~, of County, (name hereinafter referr, ed to as the" " (Name of facil'~tY)' and the ~,Iinneapolis Area Chapter, American Red cross hereinafter referred to as "Red Cross". RECITALS Pursuant to the terms of Federal statutes,-the Red Cross conducts relief and rehabilitation.activities on behalf of individ- ual and family victims of natural disasters. ~ is authorized to permit Red Cross to use (Name of facility~ buildings, grounds,'and equipment for mass care si'~elters required in the conduct of Red Cross disaster.relief activities and wishes to cooperate with the Red Cross for such purposes. The parties hereto mutually desire t° reach an understanding that will result in making the.aforesaid.facilities of ~ .~ ..... Facility name available to the Red Cross for the aforesaid use,... NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed between the parties as follows: ........... . .. 1. agrees that, after meeting its responsi- ...... (Facility'name) bilities to its constituents, it Will permit, to. the extent of its ability, and upon request by Red Cross, the use of its physical facilities by Red Cross as mass shelters 'for the victims of natural disaster. 2. ~ 'Red cross agrees-that it shall 'exercise reasonable care in the conduct of its activities in such facilities and further agrees to replace or reimburse for any facility supplies (facility name) that may be used by Red Cross in the conduct of its relief activities in said mass shelters. 3. Red Cross agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless against any claim, demand or liability for death (Facility name) or injury to persons or damage to property which may be asserted against arising out of Red Cross use of said (Facility name) facilities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE governing board of the (Facility name) has caused this agreement to be executed Dy the President of the governing board, and the Red Cross has caused this agreement to be executed by the Chairman of its Minneapolis Area Chapter, said agreement to become effective and operative upon the affixing of the last signature hereto. SIGNATURES TO THE AGREEk, M~NT DATF/D Red Cross chapter chairman DATED Authorized representative of facility sHELTER INFORMATION hereby authorizes the Minneapolis Area (Official name o~ facility)· Chapter of the American Red cross to utilize our facilities in the event of disaster. 1. Address and telephone number/s of facility: Name, address and telephone number of two people having key to the facility: (a) (b) Number of rooms in facility: (a) Does facility have a gym~ yes no (b) Does facility have a Cafeteria area? yes no (c) Does facility have a kitchen area? yes no Number of rest rooms in facility: Number of showers in facility: Name, address and telephone number of facility cook, food services supervisor or other person familiar with the kitchen area: 19 CITY 0P MOU~ID Mound, Minnesota August 24, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-313 SUBJECT: Dock Permits - List 9 3 Addendum # 2 Attached is a list of dock permit applications recommended for approval. =L'eonard L. Kopp ~ CITY ()f MOUND 5341 MAYTIOOD MOUND, ,, I1~ IEou, A 55364 (f;12) August 23, 1979 TO: FR~: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Dock Inspector Dock List ~3, Addendum The following people qualify for approval of their dock permits. #30450 Carlson, Richard; 4839 Longford yes $54.00 T-10 ff50805 Enghauser, William; 2971 Cambridge yes $25.00 S ~4~556 Effert, Frank; 4757 Island View Dr. yes $14.50 S ff13090 Ellis, David; 1729 Dove Lane yes $27.00 S #33090 Erickson, Jeff; 4552 Denbigh yes $25.00 S ~10610 McConville, Paul; 1740 Sumach no $25.00 S #43800 Murphy, Terry; 4913 Island View Dr. yes $27.00 S ~30510 Newman, Jeff; 4828 Long£ord yes $27.00 S ff43335 Olson, Brad; 4932 Drummond no $12.50 S ~50220 Oneil, Kevin; 5209 Drummond no $25.00 S #10670 Samuel, Ted; 1748 Sumach yes $12.50 S The following have added to their docks and are paying additional fees. #10280 Sheaner, Mike; 1741Resthaven no $9.00 L-6 #51195 Schmidt, Cliff; 2911 Cambridge yes $72.00 Burton, Wm; 4608 Carlow yes $89.00 BH Bame, Wm; 5054 Bartlett no $36.00 L-12 Dzik, John; 2530 Black Lake yes $36.00 L-12 #31600 #23110 #3111o Respectfully, · Don Rother Dock Inspector $1o,455.oo - 516.5o Aaa. #s 10,971.50 370.50 Less Refunds $10,601.00 Net Fees 47~-hlo~ 472-6225 472-6609 472-5940 472-3022 472-5212 472-5209 472-6209 472-4834 472-6431 472,-6559 472-4475 472-2915 472-6568 472-5064 2 3 8-28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 16, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-301 SUBJECT: Equipment Repair Bid A Street Department truck was in an accident and is to be repaired by a body shop. The bids exceed $1,000. so Council approval is required. The bids received are: Gustafson ~'~ '~ ~'0~$1,743.00 ~ ~'~ Mound Body Shop 3,343.00 ~ ~ ~ q C0 ~ ~'. The bid of Gustafson is recommended. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472~1155 August 13, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Public Works Director Bids for repair to Unit Old Unit 8 was in an accident this spring and the following are %he estimates for repair. 1. Gustafson $1,7h3.00 2. Mound Body Shop $3,3h3.00 We have received $3,0~9.00 from our insurance company. $1,39~,.7~ of this was used at Beeline for straightening the frame etc. I would recommend that we award 'the job to Gustafson so as close as possible to the amount received from insurance. Robert Shanley Public Works Director 8-28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-302 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Member William A. Renner of the Planning Commission has presented his resigna- tion due to being unable to attend meetings because of his work schedule. His term of office will expire January 1, 1981. The Planning Commission is now short one member. Does the Council wish to make an appointment at this time? cc: R. Peterson 8-28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 15, 1979 INFORMATION ~MORANDUM NO. 79-91 SUBJECT: Open Burning Attached is a copy of a letter received relative to proposed open burning regulations. Does the Council wish to take a stand? LeQnard L. Kop'p- ) ~ :::'.~:t..~'.~- .-:~'~L. Dear C°uncil.MemberS:. ' v. ::".~ ' '.': - .: · ,":::' . .[ ~... ,.. ~,:. :[:f ,... .. :..- ' . , .. -:- ~..t--:-.. [:.,.)'. j,':.: :,['...i.,h:.....-/ ... it., hae/:c0mk. :t° the ~tent[on o't :the newly formed. Tonka Bay AsaOCia~ion that' an~a~en~ent ie bein~ considered " ~ - .... --':t~.thiefal~ whic~ wi~ ~ow ~eeiden~e to b~n their-b~Ush ~n '. : '""~?~:.~.[::~?:~.}.?:"..:".,'h...':~'we- are""~'q~ee'~lhg':th~t you'~t~"~"'Contac ':::;.j....-.-. ;'"'..f:. Dire'°tdr, Ninnesota Pollution Control Agency,.- 1935 .& :,:l('.'~i'./:.,Y);;[':-..Road. B2, Rosevil~e', Mi~esota 55113, ((-Ph0ne 296-' [.:.-~t')t'r,'f/:.':.:/.( :, :..~ ':t: e~nvinc e'~. him. to ~: m~e': the' ame. n~ent, ".."':.:.'l '[ :' ;~:-'" [(_ ]"t:~~ ..... ':~,":~t;:': , ~-' L .-:.' ,"',.'"L: . '..,' ' . . t: --. '.' ~~~. " ..' ':. ': I ....:....: ...... ..... ..,,: . .... ..,.. ..,.....~.....::, .:~ .... . ..:,':'.:.._.. :..: :.:....:.:.:...._-...,:~. a . ' ....."_:~ .... ", ~.'::q'.' .~';.:'., [ :'~:::-.....- ...'. .-.; :,..._ '.: /~-[ ';: .- :-'" :.'.',0opiea ~o: .. ,.., ..,..-:.: ,.,~.' ,- .-:_ ,....-,.-:,.,- :,- ,': .,:. : .,, . .. ,. ...., ... ' .,,. ..,,:,:..:.-. Lon~ L~e · ::'.'(':.'-'.'? -::,.:-/'.:'--~i .,~':.:.t ['--?..:Li ii.:', f -":./:~ t'~:':~ ?' ~ap~e P lain . ': :t-":' :.':~ ..'...ti ~.7 ~. ~: ')i. :[,' .',: '--:;: 4- .::[ ' 'C' ..q" '-~:-t , ~.'.,": "- ' '--,' ,-!' ,' .: (_.,, .:,.~:"; ~:, :, ~lnneto~ Beach.: .':'~;:':"[' ; '. ': ':' ":- -:: "': :',' :' ".l _...l .-. --:-, '., tt, .~; '- ::.:".'".~:.-' .)...-...''.. :':'::'~.,: ~ouna . ,. :'- '-..-:/,:.,'?:./:.~ '. ',.... :.: [.:.i r..,:::: 1:'/-:.-.:-.:9' '[ .;' ,, : '[',,''., ,~::..( O~ono ". ': ' -' 'J ';-~tf'..':'.; :" :: :;", l:f' . ;. ': -~. ' ' ' ':' m~out~ ' "." .:' :'"-:.::::[:; ' .-': ' '.: ",".' . :': .; ,.'. : '. ' '.~ Bhore~ood ... ~: '.:...':,:~:':;"~,.. [~-~ :'.... -- ' -[:.. '.:'. / . ,....., ~' ...... Bpring'Park' '::.~.-:: i' ':':' .~'.~-' '.i:.' '-"'"-'. · :[' '.:.':'~:.'; "i'-.':.:'" ":'-: ..)::.:"t.[.~"""-... : .... :: :--' .' :, '.'.' .' .: .~oo~1~ · ' ' ' ' :'..':~: '[[~,.',:-"..'; ": ' ' -4~i CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 20, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-93 SUBJECT: Attorney's Bill - August Attached is a copy of the Prosecuting Attorney's bill for August. As you can see, much of his time was in jury trials and one case in parti- cular. The Bedell case was especially important. It was thought this case could have been bargained earlier. However, this was the accident where two Patrolmen were injured; one with a serious neck injury. Because of the possible claims, etc., the Patrolmen did not want this just passed over lightly and the result was a trial that took time for prepara- tion (In fact, it was suggested the Prosecutor may want assistance at the trial). Although the bill is larger than usual, it appears to me to be justified under the circumstances. August 10, 1979 ATTORNEY AT LAW 1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55454 612/333-5419 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERFOMED BY TII',10THY L. PIEPKORN FOR THE CITY OF I,~,0UND FOR THE MONTH OF JULY, 1979: hours 1. July 3rd: 3 Pre-trial conferences; arraignments; I Court Trial .............. 3.00 2. July llth: Bedel Jury Trial ................................................. 3.00 3. July 13th: Lindstrom Jury Trial ............................................. 2.50 4. July 16th: 1 Pre-.trial conference; meeting with citizen at Mound Office ..... 1.75 5. July 17th: arraig!)ments; 5 Pre-trial conferences; 2 Court Trials ............ 3.50 6. July 22nd: Letter to Linda; rev.i6w of files ................................. 2.00 7. July 24th: arra~gnments at Wayzata: .......................................... 1.00 8. July 25th: prepared 7 formal complaints ..................................... 3.00 9. July 31: arraignments; 4 Pre-Trial conferences; prepared 5 formal complaints..4.50 10. Bedel July Trial Preparations: a. July 2nd: legal research .............................................. 1.25 b. July 3rd: Legal research ...... ........................................ 1.50 c. July 6th: legal resea'rch; phone conversations with witnesses; preparation of Direct examination ........................................ 5.0 d. July 9th: Legal research; preparation of opening and closing arguments; preparation of voir dire .................................... 7.50 e. July 9, 10, 11: Phone-calls to and from all witnesses; Linda, .Sgt. Roy..1.50 f. July 10th: ~onference with chemist Bruce Person;.preparation of cross examination and direct ................................. 6.00 46.00 TOTAL TIME ($300 for 15 hours and $30.00 an hour for.31hears) ........... $1, 230.00 LESS DISCOUNT OF $230.00 leaves TOTAL 0~,~ING ........... ..$1,000.00 P.S. There was a lot of time put into the Bedel case which I have not included- -k ATTORNEY AT LAW 1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55454 612/333-54~ 9 on this bill. On the day of trial the defendant's attorney .agreed to the follow~.ng negotiation: 1. Plea.~of guilty to Careless Driving; 2. $500 fine ( maximum fine); 3. 90 days revocation of Dr~iver's L4~cense; 4. Counseling at Community Family Counseli.ng Clinic; 5. Judge Wolner stayed 30 days in Jail on the condition that D have no same or similar charges within the next year:' The probation officer found that Mr. Bedel was not chemincally dependent. That was his first alcohol related dr~ving conviction. All our witnesses .agreed to this proposed disposition of the case before I accepted the n.egotiation.. {-28~79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 22, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-94 SUBJECT: Arbitration Award Attached is a copy of a letter from the Metropolitan Area Management Association stating that New Hope is going to Court on an arbitration award. Does the Council wish to contribute financially on this case? "fe0nar~ L. Kopp ~ of the Twin City Area August 10, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ~¢~/A-320 CITIES Jerry Splinter, Chairman lg~ Public Safety Com_~ittee ARBITRATION AWARD tN NEW HOPE Arbitrator Joseph DaVy interpreted Article 9.4 of the NDU,~'IBT, Local 320 ' MASTER AORE~,,~NT in a manner which lega!co~nsel to Labor Relations Associates, Inc. considers cha!lengeable in court, with a reasonable chance of success. On behalf of New Hope specifically, and the ~V~\~-320 cities, },rtA.~,~ intends to challenge the award which requires that 9.4 of the ~'~-320 ~STER AGREemeNT apply to work assigrnments of a police officer even though no change in job classification takes place. The legal bill will b~ divided between those com~.unities involved with the 1978 ~'J~A-IBT, Local 320 arbitration award and/or cities whose police are represented by IBT, L6cal 320 or LELS where the ~;mster Contract language of 9.4 is a part of their agreement. If you have ~ reservations regarding participation in this challenge please notify me by August 25, 1979. CC: ~At\~-IBT, Local 320-Cities covered by the 1978 arbitration award. O. F. Smythe 1978 ~7~2~,t~ Joint Bargaining Cities 1. Blaine 2. Brooklyn Center 3. Brooklyn Park Columbia Heights 5. Crystal 6. Edina ?. Fridley 8. Hopkins 9. ~;~plewood 10. Mendota Heights 11. ~ounds View 12. New Brighton 13. New Hope 14. North St. Paul 15. Robbinsdale 16. Roseville 17. St. Louis Park 18. White Bear Lake 19. Coon Rapids Other Cities with language of 9.4 1. Hastings 2. Inver Grove Heights 3. Lakeville 4. Oakdale 5. Farmington 6. ~ound 7. Wayzata 8. West St. Paul 8-28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 24, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-95 SUBJECT: Dock Permit Refunds Attached is a copy of refunds recommended on shared and unassigned docks. These will appear on the list of bills. cc: City Clerk 3_ CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (6~2) 472-!155 August 23, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp Dock Inspector Dock Application Refunds The following applicants qualify for refunds on dock permit fees for reason given. Whitman, Charles; 3013 Brighton Neraasen, Dennis; 4725 Bedford Keintz, Natalie; 4937 Drummond Mc Conville, Paul; 1740 Sumach Kelly, William; 1725 Wildhurst Oneil, Kevin; 5206 Drummond Illies, Rich; 4927 Hanover Halleron,~Dennis; 3179 Devon Hapkins, Dennis; 4609 Wilshire Heine, Richard; 3?26 Warner Warner, Todd; 6033 Cherr3wood Umbehocker, David; 3243 Warner Thalen, David; 4720 Island View Dr. Cutter, Weston; 3061 Brighton Ellenz, Michael; 4845 Edgewater Heitz, Lav~ence; 2739 Clare Danielson, Robert; 5580 Tonkawood Ehlebracht, Wayne; 4873 Shoreline Blvd. $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o $12.5o $25.oo $27.00 $25.oo $25.00 $25.oo $25.00 $25.oo $25.oo $27.00 $27,00 $27.00 $370.50 Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharing Sharing Not asszgned Not asstgned Not asszgned Not asszgned Not asszgned Not asszgned Not asstgned Not assigned Not assigned Not assigned Not assigned Re s pectfully, Don Ro.~h~r Dock Inspector DR/iCh CLAYTON L. LIEFEVERE HEF~EIRT P. LEFLE~ JOHN B. DEAN LAW OFFICES LEF'EVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ I100 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING M NNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 August 12, 1979 TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 Mr. Len Kopp, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Perron v. City of Mound. Dear Len: I am enclosing for your information and review copies of the plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories as submitted by the attorneys representing the City and Home Insurance Company. Very truly yours, Curtis A. Pearson CAP:Ih Enclosure STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF IIENNEI'IN DISTRICT COURT FOURTII JUDICIAL DISTRICT Ellora A. Perron, Plaintiff, VS. City of Mound, Minnesota, a municipal corporation; Gary L. Phleger, Attorney at Law; Officer Richard A. Johnson; Bradly J. Mason; and John Doe and Richard Roe, Defendants, and City of Mound, Minnesota, a municipal corporation; Gary L. Phleger, Attorney at Law and Officer Richard A. Johnson, Third-Party Plaintiffs, The Aetna Casualty and' Surety Company, a Connecticut corporation licensed to do business and doing business in the State of Minnesota,. Third-Party Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS TO THE INTERROGATORIES OF TIlE CITY OF MOUND Plaintiff Ellora A. Perron hereby submits the following Answers to the Interro- gatories of the City of Mound: '- 1. State bow you have been damaged as a result of the allegations contained in paragraph VIII of your Complaint. Be specific as to each and every item of damage you claim rising out of each specific allegation. 1. ANSWER: It is impossible for me to separate the damage I suffered because of the actions of Officer Richard A. Johnson set forth in paragraph VIII from the damage stated in the other paragraphs. However, because of the actions which ensued I have sustained damages among other things to my physical and mental welI-being. I couldn't sleep at night until I received medications. I tremble inside as well as visibly outside. I was required to seek the attention of a physician. I was required to obtain the services of legal counsel to defend against the unfounded allegations. I was forced to quit my job and lost my pubIic employees retirement and other benefits. I could have worked ten years before compulsory retirement and three years before voluntary retirement. I had to sell my home and move out of Mound, Minn';.;sota. V 2. State tt~e names of all those persons whom you claim are witnesses to the allegations of paragraph XIII. Delineate each allegation and the witne~es to each allegation. 2. ANSWER: Mr. Gary L. Phleger, Esq.; .Judge Neil Riley; Mr. Wayne M. Boysen; Mr. IIarold W. Schulz II, Esq.; Mr. L. T. Merrigan, Esq.; and other Court personnel whose names I do not know. 3. State all those fa. ets upon which you base your allegation concerning the "normal and accepted procedure in like eases" delineated in paragraph XV of your Complaint. 3. ANSWER: It is the understanding of the plaintiff and her counsel that where a person stands accused and vohmtarily submits to a polygraph examination, which reveals the truth of the accused persons testimony, that the charges are norm~ny dismissed without further proceedings. Specific instances where this procedure was followed should be known to Mr. Phleger. 4. If you claim that anyone on your behalf requested of the' attorney,' Gary Phleger, that he in turn request anyone else to submit to a polygraph examination, state the names of those persons. If you do not, than indicate so. 4. ANSWER: Plaintiff through her counsel requested that polygraph examination. be taken of Richard A. Johnson and Bradley J. Mason. 5. State all those facts upon which you base your allegation that the "charges against the Plaintiff beeame a matter of notoriety in that community" as contained in paragraph XVII. · 5. ANSWER: There was a substantial amount of talk taking place in the community concerning the alleged sale. Articles appeared in the local newspaper concerning the criminal action brought against me. 6. State all those facts upon which you base your allegation that Defendant, Phleger, acted "not out of a sense of proseeutorial responsibility, but either because of fear, maliciousness or both" in proceeding with the prosecution of the plaintiff, as said allegation ~s contained in paragraph XVIt. 6. ANSWER: Plaintiff understands that certain "political" pressures were exerted against Mr. Phlcgcr which forced him to continue with the prosecution of the case rather than dismissing it. That even after voluntarily undergoing a polygraph exam- ination, through an expert suggested by Mr. Phleger, and pawing the examination, Mr. Pl~lcgcr continued to pursue the case. 7. State ~1! those fac'~ upon which you base your allegation contained in [)arai;'r~;~,l XVIII that "Ric, ttard A. Johnson, and o~hcrs, have circulated rumors that the plai~,.ti~[ ~',,~s aequitte, d b~:eau::e the Court felt sorry for her." Specify which facts ~p~)!y to [~iehavd Joh~s,~b x;'hiel~ apply to your allcr~ations eoneernin~ the eireulation of ru:c~o~'.~ by "others" and Mate the witnexs who will so testify. 7. ANSi~'ER: In th(~ g~Dernmeriea service station, police officer Bostrom t°ld ,fuli:} C~,:'ae that the ,lt~{]g'e said to officer dohnson "that he thought that I was ~uilty but bee~se of. my age he said [ wasn't ~uilty." This same rumor was told to Claudia Person by officer Oohnson at the Seven-Eleven store in Navarre. 8. State a~ those feeB upon which you base your aHe~ation contained in p~agraph XIX that "subsequent to the plaintiff's acquittal at the t~ial on March 1, 1977, the Mound Police relentlessy haramed the plaintiff by makin~ frequent stops at the Mound Municipal Liquor Store ~d discussing the way she performed her job with the manager." 8. ANSWER: Chief Oohnson came into the liquor Store in August, 1977 on a friday night. The other clerk waited on him. Because I was very busy~ I did not have time to talk to him. He was wearing a light tan suit. Later I told the clerk she had just waited on the ehief of police. The fo~owing tuesday night, at a counsel meeting, he approached my boss, Nelson Seherneau, and told him that he had seen several young people in the liquor store friday night and that no one was checking I.D.'s. I te also said I didn't know who he was. 9. State a~ those fae~ upon which you base your aBegation that the acts previously alleged in p~a~raph XIX "caused the plaintiff great mental distre~", and a~ those fae~ upon which you base your aBegation that the ae~ alleged in paragraph XIX "finally forced her to resign her job on August 24, 197g." 9. ANSWER: A squad e~ backed into the fire lane next to my home. The officer was lookinj at my ear ~d writing something down on a pad. This was the day after the trial on March 1, 1977. Squad ears drove past my house much more frequently after the ~ial. One night, my sister and I were returnin~ home after swimming at a friends house at about 11:00 p.m. when a squad ear tailgated me for approximately 2-3 miles. They turned off about one block from my house. I received an obscene phone call at 2:30 a.m. durin~ this period. I had never received one before and haven't received one since. The superintendent of the ~:lound schools wrote a letter to. councilman Gordon Swenson stating he should quit sticking his neck out for me. The council tried to expel Mr..gwenson becsuse he persisted that I was being unfairly ehar~ed and harassed. 10. If there are any special eireumstanees surrounding any of the acts undertaken by any of the defendants that you claim qualify them as "wanton, negligent, wrongful, outrageous and malicious acts", then so specify. 10. ANSWER: See plaintiff's answers to all of the above questions. 11. If you claim that you have had your earnings decreased in any manner, then state the followiny: a. Any dates you may have missed work because of any of the acts of the defendants alleged in your Complaint, b. Any diminution' .in salary or benefits that you may have received as a result of any of the acts alleged in your Complaint, e. The date on which you returned to work after August 2.4, 1977 at any occupation. d. If you will do so without a Motion to Produce, please provide us with eopies of your tax returns for the last five years. 11 ANSWER: (a-b) I was forced to quit my job because of the outrageous mental harassment. (e) I have not returned to work. (d) Attaehed. 12. State the names of nny persons whom you claim are witnesses to any of the facts of this litigation, state also their addresses, telephone numbers, and place of employment if known to you, 12. ANSWER: All the parties, previously named in answers to your questions and Donald J. Geffre and Arthur Werts. 13. If you have any photographs relatin~ to any of the facts in this litigation then state the name of the person holdin~ same and describe generally the content thereof. 13. ANSWER: No photographs have been takcn. 14. If you have collected any unemployment benefits since August 24, 1977, 'state' the dates for which collected and the amount thereof. 14. ANSWER: I have not collected unemployment. 15. Set forth in detail all injuries you elaim to hove sustained as a result of the acts alleged in your Complaint. 15. ANS¥¥ER: See my answer to question No. ~. 16. If you claim to have obtained any medical treatment as a result of the injuries herein then state the following: 16. ANSWER: (a) Dr. Gallagher; Dr. Seversihe. The dates of treatment will be supplied. (b) The bills were paid by Physicians Health Plan. 17. If you were hospitalized or treated as an out-patient as a result of the injuries elaimed herein then state the name and address of the hospital or hospitals and the dates of confinement or treatment and the amount of the bins. (Attach copies of bills). 17. ANSWER: I was not hospitalized. 18.. If you were confined to your home as a result of the injuries claimed herein give the dates of confinement. 18. ANSWER: August 24, 1977 'to date. 19. If'you claim to have recovered from your injuries state on what date you recovered, if you have not recovered set forth in detail a~ of your pre~'ent complaints. 19. ANSWER: I have not recovered. See answer to question l~Io. 1. 20. If you claim any permanent injuries, set forth in detail which injuries are claimed to be permanent and the extent thereof, and the names and addresses of the doctors who will so testify. 20. ANSWER: See answers to questions No. 1, 16 and 19. 21. If you are still under treatment or observation by any physician as a result of the injuries claimed herein than state the date of your last treatment and by whom 21. ANSWER: To be supplied. 22. D~,ring a period of ten years preceding the incident herein state: a. Names and addresses of all persons who have examined or treated you for any physical or mental condition, whether d~le to accidenta] injury or otherwise. b. The nature of condition treated, or thc reason for such examination. c. Specific dates of said treatment or examination identifying the partictllar person administering the same. d. All periods of hospital confinement, getting thc name and address of each hospital, specific datcs of admissions and discharges, the names and addresses of attending or cons~lting physicians, and the conditions for which hospitalization was required and the care and treatment received. 22. ANSWER: (a) Mayo Clinic; Dr. Gallagher, Dr. Seversihe. (b) High blood pressure; nervousness. (c) February 27, 1977 (d) I do not keep medical records and bills for such a long period of time. I wi]] do my best to locate them. 23. If you have been injured subsequent to the acts alleged in the Complaint, state the date of the injuries, the nature of the injuries, the manner in which they were received, and whether or not any litigation was commenced as a result thereof. 23. ANSWER: None. 24. If you suffered from any physical impairment prior to the injuries alleged hercin, state the date such impairment was first known to you, the nature and extent thereof, and the names and addresses of the doctors and hospitals consulted for such condition. 24. ANSWER: See Answer to No. 22 above. 25. If you claim the aggravation of a pre-existing condition, state which condition existed and specify the following: a. What aggravation resulted for what period of time? State the names and addresses of the doctors who treated you for this aggravated condition. b. Do you claim a permanent inj,~ry or disability resulted from an aggravation of your pre-existing condition? If so, describe in detail. c. Give the names of doctors who will testify as to permanent disability due to suct~ aggravaticn. 25. ANSWER: To be supplied. 26. Set forth an itemized list of al1 other expenses that you claim as a result of the acts alleged in your Complaint as well as any property damage sustained, and state tile names and addresses to whom payment was made and thc amounts paid to each. 26. ANSWER: To be supplied. 27. If there was any hospitalization, medical payments, accident and health, d~sability insurance in force that you l~ave made claims against arising out of the injuries alleged in your Complaint, then state the names and addresses of the compan!es, the amount paid to you or on your behalf, and the dates and names and addresses of the persons to whom these payments were made. 27. ANSWER: Physicians Health Plan. A detail of the expenses.will be supplied. 28. If you have retained or specially employed any experts whom you expect to call as witnesses at the time of trial, then state the subject matter upon which they are expected to testify, state each and every conclusion or opinion which they may offer, and specify the facts upon which these conclusions are based and the separate bas~s for each opinion. 28. ANSWER: No experts have been retained to date. If and when ~ve do retain an expert this information will be supplied. EIlora A. Perron Subscribed to and sworn before me this ~ ,zT'~day of , ~':~', ~' , 1979. Notary Public BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINERS 1745 University Avenue ~~,~ St. Paul, MinnesOta 55104 FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Seventh Floor, American Center Building 160 East Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 In the Matter of Continental ) Telephone Company's Petition ) for Authority to Change its ) Schedule of Telephone Rates ) for Customers Within the ) State of Minnesota. ) PETITION OF CITY OF MOUND FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE P-407/GR-79-500 1. The City of Mound hereby petitions the Hearing Examiner for leave to intervene in the above entitled proceedings. 2. The City of Mound is within the service area of Continental Telephone Company and will be affected by the change in rates for telephone service proposed by Continental Telephone Company. 3. The City of Mound states and alleges that leave to intervene should be granted by the Hearing Examiner on the grounds: (a) that the municipality itself, as a governmental entity, is a substantial direct consumer of Con- tinental Telephone Company and will be bound and affected either favorably or adversely with respect to an interest peculiar to such municipality as distinguished from an interest in common to the public or other taxpayers in general; and (b) that the municipality represents, through its duly elected representative bodies, substantial numbers of customers of Continental Telephone Company, including residents and public and commercial interests which cannot adequately be represented by anyone else. 4. The City of Mound further states and alleges as grounds for its petition to intervene 'that it has a substantial interest in this proceeding to the end that there should be permitted no excessive, unjustified, unwarranted or discriminatory rates, classifications, schedules, or charges for telephone service as to the City of Mound itself and to the customers it represents. WHEREFORE, the City-of Mound by its undersigned counsel acting at the direction of the City Council respectfully requests that an order be entered granting it leave to intervene and partici- pate in these proceedings with the attendant rights of a party in interest, including the privilege of receipt of all copies of pleadings, testimony, orders and briefs filed in said matter, and attendance at preheating conferences, and that. it be afforded all other privileges and rights of a party in the proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Office of Hearing Examiners and the Public Service Commission. BY Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney for the City of Mound 1100 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 FOR - CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 DATE D: ~BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINERS 1745 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Seventh Floor, American Center Building 160 East Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 In the Matter of Continental ) Telephone Company's Petition ) for Authority to Change its ) Schedule of Telephone Rates ) for Customers Within the ) State of Minnesota. ) VERIFICATION P- 40 7/GR-79-500 1, Curtis A. Pearson, state the following: 1) that I am the City Attorney for the City of Mound; 2) that I am authorized to file the foregoing Petition to Intervene in the name of and on behalf of the City of Mound; and 3) that I have read the foregoing Petition to Intervene and know its contents and believe all statements made therein to be true to the best of my knowledge, 'information and belief. Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney City of Mound. 1100 First National Bank Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2-~ ~ day of August, 1979. No t~ary Public · J-'.,., NOTARy PUBLIC ~ HENNEPIN COUNTY ~ M~ Commission Expi~es Jan. BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINERS 1745 University Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55104 FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC SERVICE COM34ISS ION Seventh Floor~ American Center Building 160 East Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 In the Matter of Continental ) Telephone Company's Petition ) for Authority to Change its ) Schedule of Telephone Rates ) for Customers Within the ) State of Minnesota ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE P- 407/GR- 79-500 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. CURTIS A. PEARSON, being first duly sworn, hereby deposes and says: That on the ~day of August, 1979, he served the attached Petition to Intervene of the City of Mound, Minnesota, in the above referenced matter, on John C. McNulty, attorney for Con- tinental Telephone Company; Larry Salustro, attorney for Participating Department Staff; by mailing to them a copy thereof, enclosed in an envelope, postage prepaid, and by depositing same in the post office at Minneapolis, Minnesota, directed to said attorneys at 1800 Midwest Plaza Building, Minneapolis, Minnesota and at Minnesota Public Service Commission, American Center Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101, respectively, and Eldon J. Spencer, Jr., Residential Utility Consumer Unit, Office of Consumer Services, Metr~Square Building, 7th & Robert, St. Paul, Minnesota,' . ~/' Curtis A. Pearson City Attorney for City of Mound, Minnesota Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1979. Notary Public -- - ~._.,~, MARGARET SORENSEN ~,\ NOTARY PUBLIC · MINI~ESOTA ~',~-" ~ H£NNEPIN COLJNTY ~ My Commission Expires J.~n. 4, 1980 2-37 E. F. ROBB. l ~t, COMMISSIONER PHONE 348 -3084 BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5548? August 17, 1979 The Honorable Jerry Mevissen, Mayor Council Members and Residents City of Independence Poute 1 Box 12lA b~ple Plain, Minnesota 55359 Dear Jerry, et al: Understandably, you were disappointed yesterday when a simplistic mot/on, the effect of which, if approved, appeared to remove the City of Independence from consideration for a sanitary landfill site, did not pass. As Chairman of the Hennepin County Public Service Coranittee, I was, and am, persuaded that success of this mot/on ~uld not have had the effect you desired and would not have been in the best interests of the residents of Hennepin County. I believe further that we have reached, or will very soon, the time when traditional "garbage dumps" are not acceptable anywhere. However, each of us is generating huge quantities of solid waste, including raw garbage, collectively more than 2,000 tons per day in Hennepin County, and we must find resources through which to deal with this waste. Each of us must accept our share of this awesome responsibility. To try to eliminate absolutely aqy community in Hennepin County from its share of this responsibility means to eliminate all municipalities from their shares. This we cannot do without implicitly statin9 that we in Hennepin County insist upon the right to dump our problems on our surrounding neighbors in other count/es or even in other states. Thus, logic demands we find for ourselves acceptable, comprehensive solutions to the presently degrading and offensive m~thods of solid waste disposal. The alternatives to such a solution with our own resources are to force others to accept our problem or to force upon us their solution because the problem will not go away. We have the resources here in Hennepin County for the solutions to this monumental problem. What we need is the determination to find its solution. The State of Minnesota, by law, inposed this responsibility on the Henncpin County Board of Cor~aissioners. I pledge to you my every effort to this end. August 17, 1979 The Honorable Jerry ~vissen, Mayor Council M~nkers and Residents Page 2 Until we achieve a solution, anxieties, tentmrs, inconveniences, and ex~snses must be exp~gcted. Shouting matches ~d refusal to follow reasonable, orderly procedures, can only delay the process, which is what ha[~ened yesterday ~,~en one con~nissioner refused to accept application of parliamentary procedures in a fo~ml setting. I apologize to you for my inability, in the chair, to control the meeting, and assure you that I have already taken steps, hopefully, to prevent a reoccurrence of the disruptive nature of yesterday's experience. Perhaps it is symbolic that "Independence" is a party to our efforts to find a local solution to our enormous solid waste problem. Trusting you share my spirit and determination in this matter, I remain E. F. Robb, Jr. Conmissioner cc: Governor Albert H. Quie Commissioners Hennepin County municipalities Hennepin County legislators Dale Ackmann, HennepinCountyAdministrator SOLUTION NO. ~e follow[n9 resolution was offered by ComMssioner Robb %~]U']{E/k5, ~ an~tary I~ndfill Site S~lection - Phase III - P~.port on Public Hearing and f~con~u~ndatJ, ons", August, 1979, has been received, and %~]SQ~>\S, uud~ current circunmt~ces any sanitazqf landfill site in Hennepin Co~u]ty is unacceptable, and %'~F2'iAS, a c~mprehensive solid waste disposal strategy, in contrast to an incren~ntal strategy, is necessary, BE IT RESOLVED, staff is directed to prepare a conprehensive solid waste disposal strate~/f to include on-site collection, intermediate transfer and handling .including re-use of materials, and ultimate disposition of inert and inoffensive residue. ~]is conprehensive strategy shall include legal, economic, physical, ~d aesthetic considerations, and shall define and describe locations, methods, estimated qu~]tities and costs, and approval of requirements for 5, 20, and 100 year periods. FURRIER RESOLVED, a copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to appropriate authorities including but not limited to the Governor of the State of Minnesota and the Chairman of the ~tropolitan Council. ~]]e question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were YEAS, and NAYS, as follows: COhq~Ff OF }IJP4NFJ?IN BOARD OF CfXIN~f CC~'IMISSIONERS Jeff Spartz Randall E. Johnson Richard E. Kremer Jotul E. Derus E. F. Robb, Jr. Sam S. Sivanich Nancy Olkon, (]]air YFA NAY Crn-~R Attest: Deputy County Auditor CLAYTON L. LI:FE:V£R£ HI~'REI£RT P. L~'rLIrR CUR?IS A. PEARSON ~OHN B. DEAN MA~Y J. BJORKLUNO LAW OFFICES <~4~1~ LEF['-VE , LEFLER. PEARSON, O'BRIEN RAWZ IIOO FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554.0::> August 20, 19 79 TELEPHONE Mr. John R. Cameron McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Re: Mound 19 79 Street Easements Dear John: This will confirm our telephone conversation of last week regarding IP easement 718. It is my understanding from your conversation that the existing road encroaches upon a portion of a small, narrow lot. It is my further understanding from you and Mr. Strand that the owner is deceased and that you contacted the attorneys who had handled the estate who are unwilling to open the estate because of the expense incurred, which is probably more than the value of the lot. If I understand correctly the lot probably is not buildable and is going tax forfeit. It was determined that constructing the road per your plan or over the existing roadway does p~esent a calculated risk to the City because it is possible that we could be sued by the descendants of the owner for trespass. It would be necessary for them to reopen the estate and obtain title to the property and you and I have con- cluded that it is probably in the best interest of the City to take that risk. If there is litigation in the future any damages in- curred by the City should be minimal and would not exceed what it would now cost in legal costs to try to get the estate opened and, a condemnation proceeding commenced. Based. upon this set of facts, I agree with your letter of August 17, 1979 to proceed as lOng as the City understands it is taking a calculated risk. I don't think from a money damage standpoint we would come out any worse under this arrangement than we would if we attempted to condemn and reopen an LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLEIR, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Mr. John R. Cameron Page 2 August 20, 19 79 estate where apparently the heirs have no desire to oPen up the matter. Very truly yours ,/'~ ~urtis A. PearSon City Attorney CAP:ms cc: Mr. Leonard L. Kopp Mr. Jeffrey Strand OES(:J-E~:cJ {LOg) BNOHda'i:I/ ~3Z:9G ¥/OS3NNIV,~ 6Z;08-6L8 (Z;t9) :tNOHd::I-F::I.L 0~cJ ¥/OS~NNIIAI 'NOSNIHg.LCIH 00L£-6SS ¢[t9) :;NOHd:l'la/ ddoM paeuoo% :oo '0MI 'S2%VIOOSSV NOSZfR~-S~.~0DoN 's~no~ Xln~ Xa~A · aou~ sn 3~I ~Seald uo ~aoa ~o X3uald p~q ~q 3hq Mut=ds stq~ M~ ~uo ~la~mtxo~dd~ ~o~ dn semoq~ pIoq PIP stu~ '~a~=35 ~ 8uImoa3~u ~q siR3 p~AIO$~a ~II~Ut~ pu~ ~ ~ooI o~ ~u~a ~u~n noX ~I -p~uot~usm no~ sauo Xiuo sq~ aa~ asat~ o2 a~p=o ut poomR3~o~ 3uoi~ ~u~=os~ u~ ui~2qo o2 oa~ a~o~ si~3 go oun£ uT PiP a~l 'po~a~2s ~It~n3~ ~aon oq~ Ii~un s3ua~s~ oq~ q3in ~iqoad : 3and vaosouulI~ 'punctI :3vo[qns g0~ ~os~uu~N 'Sllod~otru~{ SuIpIyn~ ~u~5 i~uoI~N 2saI~ 00II 6t6I 'LI 3sn~nV IU~NNV'Id IllS ~1 IBOA~]/',,Bns 0N¥'1 '1~ SB3]NIgN] 9NII'InSNOO '3NI 'S:JIVI3OSSV NOSIr'IN)t-S[llAIOOOlAI 8-28-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota August 16, 1979 INF©RMATION MEMORANDUM 79-92. SUBJECT: Mound Bay Park Parking At a past Council meeting, Mrs. Cornelius, the daughter of a family living across the street from the Community Cente~ appeared before the Council objecting to the use of the Parking Lot at the Community Center by people other than those using the Center. The Police do make stops at the lot, but can't be there all the time. The erratic driving and the noise from the persons using the lot apparent- lydisturbs Mrs. Cornelius and her parents the most. Mrs. Cornelius has suggested that parking in the lot be limited to those using the Community Center. The Council can limit parking which would mean posting the lot and, if the Council wished, a chain or something could be used to close the lot after a certain time. A chain would necessitate hiring someone to close the entrance at a certain time each day. The decision on what to do with the lot is a Council de6ision. The alter- natives seem to be as follows: 1. Open and close the lot at a certain time each day. 2. Close the lot to all parking except those using the Community Center. This could mean putting a chain across the entrance and then having the person opening the Center open the lot when they open the Center and closing it when they leave. 3. Keep it as is allowing park users as well as Center users to use the lot. 4. Close the lot completely which does not appear to be a viable soluti6n. LLK/ms cc: Park Commission Mrs. Cornelius Police Department sonar . opp / , L0 MINN ETONKA CONSERVATION L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE ~CT August, 1979 Wednesday 8-22-79 Annual ~4CD Board Lake Inspection 5 p.m. aboard "Dowager Empress" at Grays Bay Resort Wednesday 8-29-79 Public Hearings: Pelican Point New Dock License City of Wayzata New Dock License & Variance 7:30 p.m., LMCD Office NOTE: No other meetings are ~cheduled for the month of August. 8-10-79 LAW OFFICES LE:FEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ.. IlO0 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 August 10, 19 79 Mr. John Cameron McCombs-Knutson Associates, Inc. 12800 Industrial-Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Dear John: Re: 1979 Mound Street Eas th ous e TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 I am enclosing suggested wording which should be reviewed with Mr. Easthouse to see that this is acceptable. If it is acceptable, we then should have the Council specifically accept the easement subject to the condition and put that in the Council minutes with the hope that this will satisfy Mr. Easthouse and will permit him to execute the easement in behalf of the City. If you have questions about the wording of the condition, or if the City feels it cannot accept the proposed condition, then of course we will have to seek some other method of obtaining the easement. Very truly yours, Curtis A. Pearson CAP: ih Enclosure cc: Mr. Len Kopp This easement is granted to the City with the specific understanding that the grantors' detached garage does not meet the setback requirements of the City's Zoning Code and therefore the property is a non-conforming use. The City in accepting the easement agrees that the grantors can repair the detached garage if it is damaged during street construction or at any time in the future is damaged by a vehicle using the street or'by street maintenance equipment. RESOLUTION RESOLUTION EXPRESSING A DESIRE TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY OF OPPOSING THE PROPOSED CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE RATE INCREASE WITH OTHER CITIES AND APPOINTING REPRESENTATIVES TO ATTEND MEETINGS WHEREAS, Continental Telephone Company has filed for another rate increase! and WHEREAS, Continental rates were increased only a few years ago and in some Cities a few months ago~ and WHEREAS, it is felt a determination should be made as to whether or not~ the City should oppose the incre&se~ and WHEREAS, the City of Mound has inquired whether or not our City might want to consider a cooperative effort in opposi.ng the rates, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF That the City does hereby express a desire to enter into dis- cussion with other Cities to determine whether or not the City of . ~H~ ~. ' should enter into coopera- tive effort to chal'lenge the proposed rate increase: BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That ] ~ ~ ~'k .~. and or -. ~/)~'XX-~ ''~-~3 are hereby appointed to represent the City at the proposed discussion meetings, Adopted by the City Counci. 1 of. .[~.%'~{~ f.~].. 13 Published by the Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board ~ LeRoy H. Johnson, Chairman ~ METROPOLITAN 911 TELEPHONE BOARD FORMED Ramsey County ~¥~ In mid-April a comalittee consisting of as- sistant county attorneys from each of the seven Metropolitan counties met to discuss the feasibility of forming a joint powers organization to implement 911 in the Metropolitan Area. The organization would apply for funding, request and approve bids, supervise installation and operate the regional aspects of the 911 system. On May 31 the Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board held its first meeting. The Board consists of representatives from each of the six counties which have signed the agreement. Business completed by the Board as of July 31 includes adoption of bylaws, completion of a memorandum of agreement with the Metropolitan Council (for planning grant funds and staff services), election of officers, and adoption of 1979 and 1980 budgets. The former 911 Technical Advisory Com- mittee of the Metropolitan Council has become the Technical Operating Committee (TOC) for the Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board. Additional information about the new Board may be obtained by contacting Roanne Ehrlich at (612) 291-6506 or Mark West. man at (612) 291-6539. 911 TELEPHONE BOARD MEMBERS The following county commissioners have been appointed to represent their counties on the Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board. (Officers of the Board are noted): Anoka County LeRoy H. Johnson - Chairman Albert Kordiak Carver County Jerome Aretz Joe F. Neaton Hennepin County Richard E. Kremer E.F. Robb, Jr. Jeff Spartz Diane Ahrens Robert J. Orth Donald E. Salverda Scott County Douglas L. Hafermann William Koniarski - Vice Chairman Washin~cton County Joseph P. Fogarty Wesley R. Scheel - Secretary-Treasurer WASHINGTON COUNTY APPOINTS NEW TOC MEMBER Mark DeWolf has resigned from the 911 Technical Operating Committee. DeWolf re- presented Washington County on the former Technical Advisory Committee. Replacing DeWolf on the TOC is Sergeant Fred Gibson of the Cottage Grove Police Department. The Technical Operating Committee consists of two locally appointed representatives from each of the seven county 911 planning committees. The committee is presently working on completing the system specifications and process for hand- ling bidding. FEDERAL GRANT APPLICATION The Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board has ap- proved the submission of a preapplication for a federal grant to assist with the installation of the regional 911 system. The preapplication is required in order for the agencies which may be contributing funds to make a preliminary decision as to whether they will consider a full application. Federal agencies which are being asked to be involved in the funding are the Emergency Medi- cal Services division of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Law Enforce- ment Assistance Administration, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the Department of Transportation. SPECIFICATIONS NEARING COMPLETION Now that the Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board is in place and operational, the Technical Opera- ting Committee is proceeding toward completion of the regional specifications. -2- Specifications Nearing Completion (cont'd) Within t_he next six weeks the TOC expects to complete the specifications and submit them for legal review prior to approval by the Metropolitan 911 Telephone Board. Concurrently the T0C will determine and recommend a bidding process to the Board. The bidding process and specifications will be compatible and will meet the legal and technical requirements~of each of the counties involved. Details will be forthcoming in the next issue of the 911 News. COMPLETION OF FINAL 911 COUNTY PLANS As the December 1979 deadline approaches for submission of Final County 911 Plans to the Minnesota Department of Administra- tion, the local 911 Planning committees will be meeting bi-weekly in the months of August, September and October. The tentative schedule for the local com- mittees is: Anoka: August 27, September 10, September 24, October 8; Carver: September 4, September 18, October 2, October 16; Dakota: August 30, September 13, September 27, October 11; Hennepin: August 29, September 12, Septem- ber 26, October 17; Ramsey: September 7, September 21, October 5, October 19; Scott: August 28, September 11, September 25, October 9; Washington: August 30, September 13, Sep- tember 27, October 11. For details contact the Local Planning Coordinator, Roanne Ehrlich, at (612) 291-6506. Cities of MOUND, SI~G ]0ARK, lVIonth 1V~INNt~Tt{ISTA & ST.. BONIFAGIUS Ju I. GENERAl, AGTI-VITY SUMMARY THIS YEA R LAST YEAR ACTIVITY MONTt{ TO DATE ' TO DATE Traffic control {citations & warnings} 607 3,088 4',091 DWI · ' 11 .- 48 ' '64 Property damage accident . -' 21 181 168 Personal injury accident 10 40 79 · Fatal accident 0 2 2 ..%dult felony gr misdemeanor arrests ~8 122 128 Juvenile felony & misdemea'nor arrests 12 94 68 Medicals 29 138 137 Animal complaints 168 930 Part I & Part II offenses 129 542 653 ;Other general investigations , 1,337 6,513 5,682 :rOTAI, 2,352 11 698 12,025 !- , iii. OFFENSE ACTIVI:~SUMMARY PART I GRIMES ~ o ~'~ <O~ o° O 0~ ~ x AduI~ Juv. }Ionaicide ., Rape , Assault Burglary , , 13 13 · ! ~ rceny .... ~6 %r ehicle Theft 2 2 TOTAL 52, 4 48 1 "0 7 :PART II GRIMES Arson .... · . ,_ For.err- &' Counterfeiting . Fraud .... 2 . 2 ..... En~bezzlement ....... Stolen. property . ._ _ _ , _ :va~.dMism 27 27 · . ~ 2 ' . 3 Weapo. ns, , .. Prostitution & Commercialized 'Vice Sex Offenses ~- i 1 . Narcotic.drug laivs 2 2 I .. .Offenses against, fam.i..ly k children 1 1 ..... . Lirluor Laws ....... Public ]Peace 21 ,_ 21 1 . 9 I All other offenses 8 8 1 7 , _ '. ' . ' -Z_'--_2 __. ' ' TOTAL ' .~ ._- I .... 2 27._7--_~. ----: 132 l~ 128 : 7 :: -_z:~_--_ z::..-. .... ~. Gi,ty o[ NOUND A4onth .July Year 1979 ~,/-.-. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY · THIS YEAR LAST YEAR AC TIVITY MON TH TO DA TE TO I)_iTE - Traffic control (citations & Warnings) 275 1,812 2,167 D\VI .. -5 27 .... Property damage accident 10-"' 94 82 Personal injury accident 5 20 ' ... 40 " Fatal accident 0 0 0 [tkdult felony & misdemeanor arrests ...... . 20 , .. 78 ... 77 ruvenlle felony & misdemeanor arrests 6 60 52 Medicals . 15 90 88 Animal complaints i 26' 68.9 .72 I. Part ! & Part II offenses 86 344 -417' Other general investigations 909 4, 170 3,506 rOTA 1,457 7,384 7,188 lo.[~:OI-~ERTY LOSS/RIiOV_ERY' SUMlX4ARY Mound Bikes ITEM Boats Clothing Currency, notes, etc. Jewelry & precious metals ~uns Home Furnishings Radio & Electronic equipment rehicles & vehicle equipment Miscellaneous TOTAL (for individual city) :GRAND TOTAL (ail cities combined) STOLEN 125 !,470 175 10,075 5OO !, 743 500 4,269 $ 18,857 24,767 IIECO'VERtgD 210 $ 243 $ 1 ,o13 . 'MOUND III.OID]~'~NS.~ ACTIVI~i~UMN(ARY ~ART t CRtM~S ~;~ ~ ~¢ ~ 0~ o° O Adult Juv~ Ho~iclde . . Robbery ;- Assault ~urgla ry 11 lJ ! L~rceqy 1R ~ 1~ 1 TOTAL 29 4 25 I '0 4 :PART II CRIMES Arson ..... Fraud ]~n~b e z zl e n~ ent .... Stolen P, r0pert¥ ...... ., y~nctalism . , 22 . 22 2 )V..c-a po. ns ,~ . _ prostitution & comme~rcialized ¥ice S, ex Offenses ,.. -- ,,i I - . , . . Narcotic drug laws 2 2 1 , I .Gambling__ . ..... Offenses agai'nst fam'ily, gr. cl~i.l_dren 1 I . .Dr!ving._[~_ndc. er the .influence .,, 5 5 5 Liquor Laws All other offenses 7 7 I 6 TOTAL 61 0 61 5 20 2 TOTA l, ~[>ART I & ]PART II CRIMES SPRING PARK l~,4ontt~ J_.uly Xc:ar 1979 -. ACTIVITY S UMMAtlY__ THIS YEA-Il LAST YEAR .ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO PATE Traffic control (citations & warnings) 256 955 . 1'429 DWI . Property damage accident : 7 :, 36 ' 37 PersonaI injury accident '. 0 4 19 Fatal accident '~dult felony & misdemeanor arrests 6 20 33 Juvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests 3- 22 !0 Medicals .~ 22 - ~3. .~nlmal complaints 18- 54 75 Part I g: Part II offenses 11 83 i 20' Other general investigatlo~ 220 1,195 1,280 TOTA L, '530 2,402 2,974 City o f M I NH.E_TLR I $.%A_ ]Month ........ ~fea r _19]_9 I. GENERAl-, ACTIVITY THIS YEA R LAST YEAR ACTIVITY MON TH TO DA TE TO DATE Traffic control (citations & wa rnings} 64 19/4 320 : . Dl%rI . . · . [ ' -3 8 12. .- Property damage accident [:'ersonal injury accident It 1 l ]/4 "' Fatal accident . 0 1 ! Adult felony & misdemeanor arrests 3 20 12 Juvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests ,, , Medicals 5 22' 10 ~nimal complaints 18' 17/4. 139 Part I ~< Part II offenses 31 i01 91 Other general investigations 165 92/4 757 FOTA L, 298 ! ,502 1,398 CAty o[ ST. B0,~IIFACiUS Ix,It, nth July ~ear 1979 I. GENEIlAL ACTIVITY SU~4MAtl~ THIs YEAR LAST YEAt( ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE ~Traff[c control (citations & xvarnings) '12 127 175 D¥7I 1 3 5' Property danaage accident -. ~PersomaI injury accident 1 5 6 Fatal accident 0 0 - 0 !Adult felony g~ misdemeanor arrests ! 4 .-' 6 Suven[lc felony lk misdemeanor arrests 0' 2 Vledicals 0 4' 6 Animal complaints 6" 13. .18 ,Part I L~ Part II offenses 1 14 25 Other general investigations 43 _ 224, 21 l TOTAL 67 410 465