Loading...
1989-06-20MINUTES MOUND CITY COONCIL COMMITTEE OF THE T~THOLE JUNE 20. 1989 The meeting was called to order at 6:30 PM. at city hall. Members present: Smith. Jensen. Jessen~ Johnson and Ahrens. Absent: none. Also present: City Manager Ed Shukle. City Planner Mark Koegler, City Engineer John Cameron. Tom Maple and Dave Schultz of Miller and Schroeder. City Manager Ed Shukle introduced Tom Maple. He presented information regarding the Essential Function Bond Program in refere~nee to multi-family housing for the Lost Lake property. Mr. Maple presented the program and what the options would be .for the City of Mound should it decide to go in this direction. It was a Council consensus not to pursue multi-family housing for the Lost Lake property. City Manager Ed Shukle pressed for the Council to discuss what exactly they would like to do with the Lost Lake property other than to clean it up. The Council basically indicated that to clean up the ground is the most important issue at this time. '~ A discussion was held with regard to alternative sites for Public Works outdoor storage. Geno Hoff. Street Superintendent and Greg Skinner. Water and Sewer Superintendent were present to discuss the alternatives that have been looked at. City Manager Ed Shukle reviewed the discussion from the May 16th Committee of the Whole meeting. where the Council had given some direction on what to investigate. Essentially. he reported that all of those options were not feasible with the possible exception of snow storage at the Waste Control Commission Site. Discussion was then held on the possibility of storage of material to the east of city hall between city hall and the fire station. It was the consensus that the staff investigate this alternative and bring it back to the next Committee of the Whole meeting. Discussion was held with regard to the Public Facilities Task Force Report on the future expansion of city hall. Discussion was held with regard to w hether the Council supported the proposal as it was presented by the Task~Force. It appeared that at least four of the Councilmen bers indicated that they supported it: The question was should they go further and spend the necessary dollars to prepare plans and specifications for bid thereby knowing what the bids would be. Simultaneously they would inform the" public as to what they were doing with the project to be paid for out of the Capital Improvements Debt Service Fund. It was the consensus to have the Task Force formally present the report to the City Council at its July 11th meeting. ~~~y A brief discussion w as held on what to do with the Milfoil problem that is washing up on the Commons shoreline and where it could be hauled. The Parks Director was directed to have a report on this. Upon motion by Johnson. seconded by Jensen. and carried unanimously the meeting was adjourned at 9:27 PM. Resp ctfully submitted. ukle City Manager ES:ls .' 2 ~~~5