The URL can be used to link to this page

79-10-23 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota AGENDA M 79-380 M 79-388 M 79-386 M 79-382/387 M 79-390 M 79-383 79-384 79-389 79-379 79-385 79-381 .lO ll 12 13 14 15 MOUND CITY COUNCIL October 23, 1979 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 3. 4. 5. 6. o Minutes Pg. 2947-2951 Public Hearing - Vacation of Cumberland Road from Stratford to Tuxedo County Road 110 Parking - Commerce.Boulevard Pg. 2944+ Street Construction Specia! Assessment - PID 13-117-24 32 O125 Pg. 2941-2943 A. Indian Mound Park & Community Development Grant Pg. 2935-2940 B. HUD Grant Pg. 2933-2934 Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 3, Block 27, Wychwood Pg. 2931-2932 Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) Requests for Bingo Permits A. Mound Fire Department Auxiliary Pg. 293~ B. Tonka Alano House Pg. 2928-2929 Water Revenue Bond Levy Pg. 2927 Delinquent Utility Bills Pg. 2925-2926 Ordinance Change - Section 26.06 Pg. 2923-2924 Payment of Bills Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 2891-2922 ~ ~ ' Committee Reports ~_~ Pg. 2952 / Pg. 2945-2946 REGULAR MEETING ~ OF Tt~E " CITY COUNCIL October 9, 1979 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on October 9, 1979 at 7:30 p.m. ,' Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Befijamin Withhart, Gordon Swenson and Robert Polston. Absent and excused was Co~nci. lmember Ulrick. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, Assistant City Attorney Jeff Strand, Assistant City Engineer John Cameron and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. M I NUTES The minutes'of the meeting of.October 2, .1979 were presented for consideration. Swenson moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meet- ing of October 2, 1979 as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. PUBLIC HEARINGS .. -... Street Vacation - Cumberland Road from Stratford to Tuxedo. The City Clerk' present, ed an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said street vacation.. Said affidavit then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for input o~ said stree~ vacation and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express .their views thereon. No persons presented objectiOns and the Mayor then closed the public hea~ing. S~en~on moved and Wi~hhart seconded a motion to continue th~ public hearing to the meeting of October 23, 1979. The:vote was unanimously in favor. Vacation of Essex Lane from Cumberland to Manchester The City Clerk presented an affidavit of publicatioD in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing'on said street vacation. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened, the public hearing for input on said street vacation and persons present to 'do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. No persons presented objections and the Mayor then closed the public hearing. Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-426 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZ!N~ THE VACATION OF ESSEX LANE FROM CUMBERLAND TO MANCHESTER. The vote was unanimously in favor. Special Use Permit The City Clerk presented an affidavit.of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said speciai use permit. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for input on said special use permit and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions: Craig Olson, 2620 Commerce Boulevard Tom Reese, 5146 Bartlett Boulevard The Mayor then closed the public hearing. October 9, 1979 ~ithhart moved and Swens0n seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-427 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANTING OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH THE STIPULATIONS.RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND bio OUTSIDE STORAGE OF PARTS, MATERIAL OR OTHER EQUIPMENT BE ALLOWED. The vote was unanimously in favor. Revenue Sharing Bud~e.t The City Clerk preSented an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said revenue sharing budget. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened th~ publi'c hcaring for input.on said revenue sharing budget and persons present to do so wire afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons offered comments or questions: Buzz Sykes, 5900 Beachwood Ken Neukircher, 4997 Tuxedo Rock Lindlan, 2561 Lakewood Lane TOny'Case, 3043 Tuxedo The Mayor then closed the public heabing. Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion to continue the public hearing. The vote was unanimously in favor. Delinquent Utility Bills The Mayor opened the public hearing fo.r input on said delinquent utility bills and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express'their views thereon.. No persons presented objections and the Mayor then closed the public hearing. Polston moved and Withhart seconded a mo'tion RESOLUTION 79-428 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY STAFF TO TURN OFF WATER SERVICE TO DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS. The vote.was unanimously in favor. Lovaasen m~ved and Withhart seconded a motion directing the staff to p~'epare future delinquent lists stating only the account number and the amount delinquent. The vote was unanimously in favor. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS Non-Conforming Use - W. ½ of Lot 27, Subd. of Lots 1 & 32, Skarp-Lindquist Withhart moved apd Swenson seconded'a motion RESOLUTION 79-429 R'ESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO DENY THE NON-CONFORMING USE. The vote was unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land - Lot 18, 19 & 20, Block 2, Pembroke Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-430 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION The vote was unanimously in favor. Front Yard Variance - Lot 10 & 11, Block 3, Woodland Point Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-431 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISION TO DENY THE VARIANCE. The vote was. unanimously in favor. October 9, 1979 Special Use Permit - Auto Repair Shop Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-432 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC 'HEARING REGARDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO BE HEARD ON NOVEMBER 13, 1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote. was unanimously'in favor. Non-Conforming Use ~ Lot 14 & 15, Block 5i WOodland Point Polston moved.and. Swenson seconded a motion to concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the non-conforming use. Lovaasen moved and Withhart seconded a substitute motion RESOLUTION 79-433 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION BUT TO GRANT THE NEEDED SIDE YARD VARIANCE OF FIVE (5) I~CHES. The vote was unanimously in favor. Non-Conforming Use - Lot 1, 2 & Part of 3, Block 1, Dreamwood Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion .. RESOLUTION 79-434 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE NON-CONFORMING USE The vote was unanimously in favor. STREET"CONSTRUCTION Lakewood Lane ; Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-635 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGINEER REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSECTION OF LAKEWOOD LANE AND WILSNIRE BOULEVARD The vote was unanimously in favor. Monmouth Road The Council directed the engineer to work out an alternative to the high wall with the property owner. Cumberland Road Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-436 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE INCLUSION OF THIS PROJECT IN THE 1979 PROJECT AND APPROVING CHANGE ORDER #5. The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Swenson seconded'a motion RESOLUTION 79-~37 REsOLuTI. ON DIRECTING THE STAFF TO CONTINUE TO NEGOTIATE FOR AN EASEMENT ON THE CUMBERLAND ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND DIRECT TItE CITY ATTORNEY TO BEGIN.CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-438 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONSTRUCTION OF STORM DRAIN ON CAMBRIDGE SOUTtt OF MONMOUTH AT THE ESTIMATED COST OF $2800. The vote was unanimously in favor. October 9, 1979 Lovaasen. moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-439 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORM DRAIN ON CAMBRIDGE JUST SOUTH OF BRIGHTON BOULEVARD .WITH THE STIPULATION THAT IT INCLUDE DRAINAGE OF PROPERTY TO THE EAST The vote wa~ unanimously in' favor. COMMENTs AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Gerald Babb, representing Tonka Corporation was present to advise the Council of an upcoming request to construct a storage building exceeding the height limitations in the present City code. Buzz Sykes and Ernie Johnson asked for a clarification o~ the action taken by the Council regarding construction of Cumberland Road. Jim Lassek, 2431Wilshire Boulevard requested the white crosswalk markings 'be changed after completion of construction of Lakewood Lane at Wilshire Boulevard. PARK COMMI. SSION'MINUTES Withhart moved and Polston Seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-440 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING USE OF LAKE LANGDON TO BE HEARD ON DECEMBER 4, 1979 AT 7:30 p.M. The vote was'unanimously in favor. 1980 BUDGET Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion - RESOLUTION 79-441. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR TO LEVY CERTAIN TAXES " The vote was unanimously in favor. Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-442 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PAYOFF OF ASSESSMENTS ON CITY OWNED PROPERTY. The vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-443 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1980 BUDGET The vote was unanimously in favor. 1980 SALARIES Lovaasen moved and Withhart seconded a~motion RESOLUTION 79-444 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING WAGES, SALARIES AND WORKING CONDITIONS FOR 1980 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ATTORNEY'S SALARY. The vote was unanimously in favor. ACCOUNTING CLERK SALARY Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-445 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 78-518 ESTABLISHING STEP INCREASES FOR THE ACCOUNTING CLERK POSITION The vote was unanimously in favor. 133 Octobe~ 9, 1979 .REQUEST FOR A WINE LICENSE Swenson moved and Withhart Seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-446 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A WINE LICENSE TO BE HEARD ON NOVEMBER 6, 1979 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. ACTING CITY MANAGER Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-447 RESOLUTION APPOINTING MARY H. MARSKE. AS ACTING CITY MANAGER FROM OCTOBER 20, 1979 TO NOVEMBER 4, 1979. The vOte was unanimously in favor. pAyMENT OF BILLS Polston moved and Withhart seconded a motion, t'o approve payment of the bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of $354,321.55 where funds are avail- able. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. I.M. 79-108POLICE GOALS The Council determined to discuss this item at a special meeting on November 19, 1979 after the Water/Sewer Rate meeting. CITY PLANNER Withhart moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-448 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CITY PLANNER TO SUBMIT A CONTRACT PROPOSAL FOR SERVICES. The vote was unanimously in favor. POLICE FACILITIES The Council requested that the ~taff prepare a time table regarding the possible change in facilities for the Police Department. HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUST.ICE COORDINATING COUNCIL Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 79-449' RESOLUTION CASTING A BALLOT FOR DOROTHY HOKR FOR THE POSITION ON SUBURBAN ELECTED OFFICIAL ON THE HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL. The vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNMENT Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to adjourn to the next regular meeting on October 23,1979 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously'in favor, so adjourned. Mary H Marske CMC, City Clerk/Treasurer Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager 10-23-79 C!TY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 15~ 1979 COUNC!L MEMORANDUM NO. 79~380 SUBJECT; public Hearing - Street Vacation Cumberland Road - Stratford to Tuxedo The easements for the proposed cul-de-sac on !nverness have been signed and an application has been made for the subdivision of the l~nd (8 lots into 3 parcels). Attached s a !.egal description of the land to be vacated, Le6, nf~rd L, Kopp COMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS [] LAND SURVEYORS ~1 SITE PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park 8oulevar.d Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 STREET. VACATION - CUMBERLAND ROAD That part of Cumberland Road adjoining Lots 10, 11, 12 & 13, Block 14, AVALON, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying easterly of the southerly extension of the west line of said Lot 13 and which lies westerly of a circle having a radius of 45.00 feet, the center of said circle is the intersection of a line 25.00 feet south of and parallel with the north line of Cumberland Road, with a line 13.00 feet east of the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 9 of said Block 14. Subject to a perpetual utility easement over, under and across the south 15.00 feet of the north 17.50 feet of said above described Cumberland Road. That part of Cumberland Road adjoining Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 14, AVALON, which lies westerly-of the westerly right-of-way line of Tuxedo Boulevard, as widened, and which lies easterly of a circle having a radius of 45.00 feet, the center of said circle is the intersection of a line 25.00 feet south of and parallel with the north line of Cumberland Road, with a line 13.00 feet east of the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 9 of said Block 14. Date: 10/8/79 #4845 Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls 10 -79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-388 SUBJECT: County Road llO Parking - Commerce Boulevard Attached are two proposed plans for parking by the stores north of Lyn- wood on Commerce Boulevard. The County has two proposals; one with 5 parking spaces between the side- walk and the stores and the other has 8 parallel spaces. The estimate of costs to the City is $4,565 for the 5 spaces and $4,399 for the 8 spaces. The County insists on a sidewalk on whichever plan is used. On the 5 car plan, there must be a 6 foot dividing space so cars backing up will not intrude into oncoming traffic. The Council has two decisions to make: 1. Do they want Plan 1 with 5 parking spaces or Plan 2 with 8 spaces? 2. Should the added cost be assessed to the property owners? Mr. "Al" Herzog of the County will be at the October 23rd meeting where this will be listed on the agenda. Also, the Council may wish to make a determination whether or not they wish to assess the City's cost on County Road llO. The City's share is as follows: 50% of Curb and Gutter 75% of New Sidewalk (Where sidewalk exists, the County replaces at no cost.) 50% of catch basin and storm sewer leads 50% of Right of Way cost Proportionate share of drainage CC: A1 Herzog Mound Medical Clinic M. Mueller Drug G. Shepherd's Laundry Pete Ward, Tom Thumb CSAH 110 - PROJECT 7002 Preliminary Cost Estimate City of Mound Share Scheme No. I - Diagonal Parking Behind Curb - 5 Cars Curb & Gutter Special B6 Curb Concrete Walk Driveway Pavement Total Estimated Cost $ 776 1300 2264 225 $4565 Scheme No. 2 - Parallel Parking - 8 Cars Curb & Gutter Cgnc~rete Wal~- . Bituminous Surfacing Total Estimated Cost $ 840 1654 1905 $4399 AWH/lar 10/16/79 RES. NO. A RESOLUTION CORRECTING AN ERROR IN THE SPECIAl. ASSESSMENTS OF 1978 MOUND STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES SECTION 429.071 WHEREAS, the Mound City Council adopted Resolution No. on ~ , 1979, lewying special assessments against properties within the City for street improvements constructed under the 1978 street improvement project, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has now advised that the formula applied for making said assessments toward property carrying the following identification: P.I.D. No. 13-117-24- 32-0125 was calculated incorrectly and said parcel should have a reduced assessment, and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 429.071 provide that the Council may make supplemental assessments to correct omissions, errors, and mistakes in the assessments, and WHEREAS, the engineer's recommendation is that the reduced assessments of $153.12 be absorbed as a part of the public share of the cost and that this reduction to correct this error then would not need mailed or p~lished notice of a rehearing, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Mound City Council as follows: 1. It is hereby determined and declared that P.I.D. No. 13-117-24-32-0125 relating to Lot 6 and a portion of Lot 2 and Lots 7 and 8 of Koehler's Addition was mistakenly assessed for 16,200 square feet and should_ have been assessed for 14,300.25 square feet. 2. That the assessment for said parcel should be reduced by the sum of $153.12. 3. That the City Clerk-Treasurer is hereby authorized~ and directed to file an amended~ assessment roll reducin~ the assessment of said parcel from $3,033.12 to the sum of $2,880.00, pursuant to the authority conferred upon this Council by ~innesota Statutes 429.071. CLAYTON L. LEFEVERE HERBErt P. LEFLEr CURTIS A. PEARSON J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN E. DrAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B. DEAN GLENN E. PURDUE JAMES D. LArSON CharLES L. LEfEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLEr ]]I JEFFREY J. STRAND JAMES P. O'MEARA MARY J. BJORKIUND THOMAS D. CREIGHTON 1AW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON,O'BRIEN & DRAWZ IlO0 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUiLDiNG M~NNeAPOII$, mINNESOTA 55402 October 26, 19 79 tELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 Ms. Mary Marske, City Clerk City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mary: I am enclosing herewith a Resolution reducing the assessment pursuant to the Council's direction of October 23. Please have this properly prepared and file the amended assessment roll with Hennepin County. tCuriis A. Pearson, City Attorney CAP: ih Enclosure ~z o.E_ 'OW H3~FIl-tO ~F.+ CiG + 00'6t~-£1 'GAqg 000/~ N N,Ag~ o-~ Zu.j O03 ,O_J -t 'Z W 03 aOOMNNA"I ~00'6~+£1 10-2~ CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 16, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-386 SUBJECT: Special Assessment - PID 13-117-24 32 0125 The Engineer advises that an error was made in assessing the subject property. The error was in the number of square feet assessed. They were assessed for 16,2OO square feet and it should have been 14,300.25 square feet, a difference of 1,899.75 square feet or $153.12. A change should be made in the assessment Whether this can be accom- plished by a resolution or must be done by filing a form to correct the error will have to be determined by the Attorney. LeOnard L. Kopp ~/ ~ McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I LAND SURVEYORS ~ SITE PLANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard] Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 October 12, 1979 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: 1978 Mound Street Improvements Assessments Dear Mr. Kopp: It has been brought to our attention that the area for P.I.D. #13-117-24 32 0125 was figured incorrectly. The assessment for this parcel should be reduced by $153.12, giving a new total of $2,880.00. If you have any questions, please contact me. Very truly yours, JRC:sc #3880 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls 0 OO · o 0 o '23-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 15, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-382 SUBJECT: Indian Mound Park and Community Development Grant The Planner will be at the October 23rd meeting to display and dis- cuss the proposed plans for the Park on Lake Langdon. Attached is a copy of a report from the Planner indicating the status of the LawCon Grant that was applied for for the development of this park. The Planner will also discuss Community Development Block Grant Pro- gram - Year VI. cc: C. Riesenberg jr¸ ISBERG, RIESENBERG, CHELSETH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 612-871-5628 October ll, 1979 TO: FROM: RE: MOUND PARKS COMMISSION CHUCK RIESENBERG LAWCON APPLICATION STATUS Our preliminary Indian Mound Park LAWCON application has recieved its ranking from the Metropolitan Council, which will be turned over to the State for funding. The funding recommendation from the Metropolitan Council leaves us with mixed results. The recommendation is to fund our application, but significantly reduced it down to $67,000 for only the boat launch part of the total application. While the application will likely-be funded, I am not pleased with slashing of the requested funds. Since it appears that the application as cut-back may not be in Mound's best interest, it would be appropriate at this time for the Parks Commission to recommend to the Council either: a. Do not proceed to final application1 NeXt year's LAWCON applications have been pushed up six months to ~and we could put together another application for a local park suited to our needs. b. Proceed into final application. Planning and Development Services AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2116 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404 612-871-5628 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: LEONARD KOPP, CITY MANAGER CHUCK RIESENBERG, PLANNER LAWCON AND CDBG PROGRAM APPLICATIONS The two programs of LAWCON/fed.(state park grant) and CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) are in initial phases of application preparation and review. As part of the joint City Council/Planning'Commission meeting to be scheduled in the near future or at one of the Council's upcoming regularly scheduled meetings, I would like to review the programs: l) LAWCON - Metropolitan Council has recommended that our Indian Mound Park grant be funded, but cut back to $67,000 and only fund the boat launch part of the original application. As we talked about this recently, the grant may not be in keeping with Our best interests. Nonetheless, I would like to discuss this with 'the Council, probably after review and recommendation by the Parks Commission. If.you like ! can develop a short memo on the grant application for everyone's review, updating the status. 2) CDBG - The sixth year application process is about to begin in earnest by mid November with about 12 individual steps taking place. ! would appreciate breifing the Council on this year's program and develop a program accordingly. Planning and Development Services ~'~ '~ ad MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: RE: MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHUCK RIESENBERG, PLANNER STATUS UPDATE ON PLANNING ACTIVITIES A number of programs are currently underway or in the process of applica- tion for which City Council update and input is needed. l) 2) 3) LAWCON Application - Metropolitan Council has recommended that our Indian Mound Park grant be funded, but cut back to $67,000 from the original $190,000 request and only fund the boat launch part of the original application. The grant may not be in keeping with our best interests. The Parks Commission has reviewed the project and will be making recommendation onto the Council. At Tuesday night's meeting, I'll go over the Park Plan, its application and the metropolitan/state selection process. CDBG - The sixth year application process is about to begin in earn- est by mid-November with about 12 individual steps taking place. I will brief the Council on this year's program and develop a program accordingly. The time schedule sheet is attached. Reaffirming last year's project selection or adjusting for this year's application will be our most important task. I will be prepared to bri6f the Council on the program and receive input. Comprehensive Plan - The Planning Commission is in the position to establish a joint meeting with the City Council to review progress to date on the comprehensive plan program. We have progressed to a land use preliminary plan, a setback recommendation report, and have started the transportati6n and housing plans. To set a date for the meeting is a timely need. 7737 Bt 10. 11. 12. 13. ~ TIME S{:IliZi)ULE Year VI - Urban !l~nnepin County Co,,,unity Development Block Grant Ac ti vi ty Time Frame Review of strategy by communities and PACACs. 10/4!79 - 10/21/79 First Public Hearings held by communities and County. 10/21/79 - 11/15/79 Submission of draft .programs and HAPS for Year VI and 'VII to PACAC. 12/1/79 * Review and cogent by PACAC of community programs and HAP. 12/1/79 - 1/15/80 Public review and con~nent by PACAC. 1/15/80 - 2/1/80 Approval of community program and HAPS by City Council .or Town Board and County Board. 2/1/80 - 2/15/80 Submission of community application to Hennepin County. 2/15/80 * Preparation of Urban Hennepin County (UHC) CDSG Application. 2/15/80 - 3/1/80 Consideration of'UHC application by Hennepin County Board & Public Hearing. 3/1/80 - 3/25/80 Submission of UHC application for A-95 review. 4/1/80 * A-95 revi'ew and response. 4/1/80 - 5/16/80 Submission of UHC application to Area HUD Office. 5/16/80 * Review of UHC Application by Area HUD Office ' 5/16/80 - 7/30/80 14. Approval of UHC app'lication by HUD 8/1/80 * * Firm deadline HC/OPD 10-4-79 0-23-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 17, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-387 SUBJECT: HUD YEAR VI - Addendum to C.M. 79-382 The Planner will be discussing the HUD Program with the Council on October 23rd. It is necessary to have a hearing on the funds to be received in 1980. The estimated amount for 1980 is $97,000. to $100,O00. It is recommended that a public hearing be established for Decem- ber 4th. L. Kopp ~ 10-2' CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 19, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-390 SUBJECT: HUD Grant Attached is a list of properties eligible for the HUD Grant to pay for Special Assessments. The amount paid on each assessment is a percent (.6969%) of the total assessment to each property. There are other ways that the amount payable on each could be determined, but it is felt that this treated all as equal as we could. A resolution authorizing the Grant payments is requested. VLe6nard L. Kopp Da t e: To: F rom: Subject: October 23, 1979 City Manager/ Mayor and Council City Clerk/Treasurer Deferred Assessments for Seniors The following applications for deferment of Special Assessments have been re- ceived. The H.U.D. grant of $25,000.00 has been divided equally and .6972% of the assessment has been forgiven. The remainder will be deferred and the County Auditor notified. Property I.D. 19-117-23 24 0004 13-117-24 13 0011 13-117-24 32 0116 13-117-24 32 0115 13-117-24 32 0004 19-117-23 31 0007 13-117-24 31 0031 13-117-24 32 0114 13-117-24 32 0113 19-117-23 32 0148 13-117-24 31 0046 13-117-24 32 0084 13-117-24 24 0014 13-117-24 21 0035 Original Assessment $2,238.16 3,348.40 2,807.90 2,458.70 1,510.50 2,402.56 2,535.60 3,3O2.20 2,451.70~ 3,606.65 2,932.29 1,023.60 2,913.66 2,322.74 Forgiven Deferred $1,560.44 2,334.5O 1 957.66 1 7~/4.20 1 O53.12 1 675.06 1 767.82 2,302.29 1,709.32 2,514.55 2,044.39 713.65 2,031.40 1,619.41 $677.72 1013 9O 850 24 744 50 457 38 727 50 767 78 999 91 742.38 1092.10 887.9O 309.95 882.26 7O3.33 TO: CITY MANAGER / MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: CITY CLERK / TREASURER SUBJECT: DEFERRED ASSESSHENTS FOR SENIORS The following'applications for deferrment of special assessments have been received. The H.U.D. grant of $25,000.00 has been divided equally and .6969% of the assessment has been forgiven. The remainder will be deferred and the County Auditor ~tified. Property ID o~'g~i~al Assessment Forgi~ 13-117'24 12 0068 ~..? 2 340 24 1 91 19-117-23 24 0004 ,559.77 13-117-24 J3 0011 2,333.50 13-i17-24 32 0116 1,956183 13-117-24 32 0115 1,713.47 13-117-24 32 0004 1,052.67 19-117-23 31 0007 1,767.06 13-117-24 31 0031 1,767 13-117-24 32 0114 2,301 13-117-24-32 0113 1,708 19-117-23 32 0148 13-117-24 31 0046 13-117-24 32 0084 " 13-117-24 24 0014 2,238.16 3,348.40 2,807.90 2,458.70 1,510.1 2,4( .6O .O6 3O2.2O .3O :,451.70 .59 106.65 2,513.47 2,9~9 2,043.51 1,023.~ 713.35 2, 030.53 Deferred 709.33 678.39 1,014.90 851.07 745.23 457.83 728.22 768.54 1,000.90 743.11 1,093.18 888.78 310.25 883.13 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 15, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-383 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 3, Block 27, Wychwood Attached is a copy of a letter requesting that the City acquire and resell by private sale Lot 3, Block 27, Wychwood. The sale is recommended. However, the Council should be aware that Lots 3 and 4 combined total only 5,460 square feet - 540 square feet short of the required 6,000. The lots in this area were platted less than 40 feet by 80 feet. ~'~ ~ '4',W I'LSHi'RE BLVD. , "----.~:/~>' · I I III ~ ....... ...... Leonard L. Kopp ' / cc: M. Schouweiler Mr. Kopp city of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 October 11, 1979 Dear Mr. Kopp, I am the owner of Lot 4, Block 27 WYCHWOOD, Mound, Minnesota. I understand thatiLot 3, Block 27 is owned by the State of Minne- sota, and that it has not been released by the city of Mound to be put up for sale. As an adjacent property owner, I am interested in purchasing lot 3. Would you please assist me in starting the necessary pro- cedure to get the land released for sale? The identification number of the property is 24-117-24-41-0085, and the size of the lot is only 41 X 70 feet, so it wouldn't really be suitable for building a house on as it is platted at this time. Thank you for any help you can give me. Sincerely, Mark Schouweiler 10-23-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 15, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-384 SUBJECT: Request for Bingo Permit The Mound Fire Department Auxiliary has requested a Bingo permit for November 15, 1979. They have requested the fee and bond be waived. 10-23-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 18, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-389 SUBJECT: Request for Bingo Permit The Tonka Alano House, 5516 Lynwood Boulevard, has applied for a Bingo Permit for the evening of October 27, 1979. They have requested that the fee and the bond be waived. LeoAard L. Kopp CITY OF MOUND APPLICATION FOR BINGO PER.MIT Name of Applicant (If an organ'ization, give organization name) Address ~- ~- ~ ~ '~"~.~C)d) ~'~,_. ~'~' Phone No Bingo Manager Address of where Bingo will be played Dates and Hours Bingo will be played (Attach separate sheet if more room necessary) Is License Fee attached? Yes No ~/ Amount Fidelity Bond: (a) Amount * (Minimum $10,000.) (b) Name of Bonding Company (c) Expiration Date of Bond *Note: Fraternal-, religious, veteran and other non-profit organizations may request the Bond to be waived. ,/P~kease~ indicate below~if you are making such a request. · - person maki~_~pplication 3-23-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 11, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-379 SUBJECT: Water Revenue Bond Levy When establishing tax levies, the levy established for the 1976 Water Revenue Bonds was overlooked. At the time the bonds were issued, a resolution was placed with.the County Auditor to levy so much each year for the bond payments in case Water Revenue isn't great enough to pay the bonds. In order to cancel this levy, it is necessary to pass a resolution. The fol- lowing is recommended: RESOLUTION 79- RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY AUDITOR NOT TO LEVY $20,918.63 FOR 1976 WATER REVENUE BONDS WHEREAS, funds from water revenue will be great enough to pay principal and interest payments due in 1980 on the 1976 Water Revenue Bonds, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the County Auditor be requested not to levy the $20,918.63 established for the taxes payable in 1980 for Water Revenue Bonds. Leonard L. Kopp } m //- CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota 3-79 October 16, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-385 SUBJECT: Delinquent Utility Bills Attached is a list of past due water and sewer accounts. These accounts are over six months past due and should be turned off for non-payment. In order to turn off the water, the Council should hold a public hearing. A suggested date for the public hearing would be November 13, 1979. Account Number 22-238-4957-71 22-259-5740-21 22-259-6601-51 22-292-6033-21 22-3o4-2933-21 22-307-6177-31 22-310-2881-81 22-31o-4140-81 22-31o-3160-61 22-310-3198-61! 22-311-6385-4]~ 22-313-6324-~)1 22-316-2882-31 22-332-2611-31 22-346-5667-21 22-4o4-5092-01 DELINQLUDIT UTILTTY BILLS (over six months old) $o-16-79 Amount $53.04 37.09 103 °29 192.95 25.23 73.38 63,73 53o. o9 51.1f 33e84 36.29 76.61 74.23 74.40 70.05 ~3-79 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 15, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-381 SUBJECT: Ordinance Change - Section 26.06 Attached is a proposed ordinance change requiring plans for new construction to show a place for a 20 foot by 22 foot garage and providing proper'access to the garage site. This can be adopted without a public hearing. Leonard L. Kopp' ~:%/-' ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 26.06 SUBSECTION (C) OF THE CITY CODE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR GARAGE LOCATIONS The City of Mound does ordain: Section 26.06 subsection (c) of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 26.06 (c). Plat Plan to Show Location of Garage. Every application for a building permit in the residential or multiple dwelling district shall show on the accompanying plat plan or survey the location of any existing garage or the location of any existing garage or the loCation of the garage proposed to be constructed by the subject application. If no garage exists and no garage is pro- posed in the subject application, or, if the existing garage is proposed to be removed or demolished and is not to be replaced in the subject application, ~then the plat plan shal~ show the location reserved for the construction of any future garage for which subsequent application for a building permit may be mad. e.. When locating the future qarage site on the plat plan, the building inspector and the applicant shall ascertain that the site is accessible to a public street or alley and shall make provision so that the future garage will accommodate two cars and be a site at least 20 feet in width and 22 feet in lenqth. Attest:. Mayor City Clerk Adopted by City Council Published in Official Newspaper October 23, 1979 To: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers From: Acting City Manager Subject:Home Improvement Grant Payment Request The red tape has finally cleared Hennepin County and a request for payment was received in my office this afternoon on a home improvement grant. Normally we hold bills for payment that come in this late for the next meeting but I'm sure the contractors listed below would appreciate prompt payment. Do-Do Construction Gulbranson Plumbing West Suburban Electric 2,752.00 1,480.89 160.00 A separate motion to approve payment is requested. CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 22, 1979 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Public Works Director Fall Trash Pickup This spring the Public Works Department decided to hold our fall trash pickup one week later so we can get more of the leaf bags at that time. After doing the spring clean-up ourselves at a cost of $3,787.04 we began checking on a different method. I approached the larger sanitation operators in Mound and found that Westonka Sanitation was interested. Attached is a price list from Woodlake which shows the charges in effect at the present time. Westonka can dump a load for $44.00, which is the equivalant of 6 of our trucks at a cost of $90.00 minimum. The cost for Illies in equivalant loads (3) is $60.00. Westonka has given us two alternatives: (1) $25.00 per hour for trucks and $5.00 per hour per man. If they use 2 trucks, two men each truck I feel they will 1hake at least 6 days to complete the job. This will amount to $2880.00 for trucks and men. If we use the same amount of loads we hauled divided by six and at his rate it will cost about $660.00 for dumping. This gives us a total of $3540.00. (2) Westonka will take the job for $3500.00 flat fee and pick? np all charges. It is my feeling that the City would make out the best by takin9 alternative ~2 due to the amount of time it may take. We also will receive all monies collected by drives for it~.s set out that are chargeable. As you can see on the Woodlake price list tires have gone up to $2.00 which is what I would like to change on the newspaper ad as we have them at 50~ each. I would like this to be handled at the October 23rd meetin9 so it could be advertised and start the clean-up on November 5, 1979. Res~ectfu%ly, _~ Robert Shanley Public Works Director RS/jcn enc: Woodla e Sanitary Service, Inc. ^ ~""~'~'"'~ °' ~.Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. WASTE SYSTEMS DIVISION EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 26, 1979, THERE T.'ILL BE A NEW PRICE SCHEDULE IN EFFECT FOR DISPOSAL AT WOODLAKE SANITARY L~NDFILL, INC. GARBAGE TRUCKS ROLL-OFFS PACKERS $ 1.60 per cubic yard $ 2.00 per cubic yard Based on truck capacity (no partial loads) DU~m TRU~:S SINGLE AXLE ABOVE SIDES TANDEM AXLE ABOVE SIDES $15.00 minimum $ 5.00 per foot $20.00 minimum $ 5.00 per foot PICKUPS LEVEL OR BELOW SIDES ABOVE S IDES $ 6.00 minimum $ 2.00 per foot TRAILERS $ 8.00 minimum STATION WAGONS $ 4.00 minimum SPECIAL ITEMS TREES & BRANCHES STUMPS TIRES CAR TRUCK TRACTOR $ 5.00 per cubic yard · $15.00 minimum $ 2.00 each $ 4.00 each $ 8.00 each CREDIT CUSTO}~RS MINI}~M BILLING $10.00 ANY ACCOUNT NOT PAID BY THE 20th OF THE MONTM WILL BE CONSIDERED PAST DUE 4000 Hamel Road / Hamel, Minnesota 55340 /479-1967 10-23-7! CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 19, 1979 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 79-391 SUBJECT: Typewriter Purchase The 1980 Budget authorizes the purchase of three typewriters. The County Bid On typewriters is $786.00. We recommend ordering the machines at the current price and take delivery after January 1st. A resolution authorizing the purchase of three typewriters at $786 each for a total of $2,358.00 is requested. ~l_ec~nard L. Kopp / - CITY of MOUND 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 October 23, 1979 TO: City Clerk FROM: Tree Insnector SUBJECT: P=yment John Watson with Eager Beaver Tree Service, Box 97, W~verly, Mn., has completed 18 of 36 trees which he is removing for the City. His total quote for the remov*l wes $3,735.00° He is requesting to be paid for half at this time and the other half at final completion. Amount to be osid $1,867.50 Respectfully, Chris Bollis Tree Inspector CB/jcn The Finance Department can include this on the list of bills to be approved for payment if the Council so wishes. ~~'~a r ske CMC Acting(~ity Manager CITY OF MOUND MOUND, MINNESOTA BID LIST COMPANY CITY TREES TREE #~96 TREE Tonk, Tree Service Sh,h~3.00 $~8~.00 $~h~.00 Eklunds Tree Service $~,029.7~ $~20.00 $2~0.00 Lutz Tree Service $~,72~.00 $37~.00 $9~0.00 Ashteys Tree $$,735.0o $350.00 ShSo.oo Ail of the sbove hsve qualified in tree licensin§ except Ashley Tree Service. CLAYTON L. L£FEVERE HERBERT P, LEFLER CURTIS A. PEARSON J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN E, DRAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOhn B, DEAN GLENN E. PURDUE JAMES D. 1ARSON CHARLES L. LEFEVERE HERBERT P. LEFLER ~T JEFFREY J, STRAND JAMES P.o'MeARA MARY J. BJORKLUND THOMAS D. CREIGHTON LAW OFFICES L,'FEVERE. LEFLER. PEARSON. O'BRIEN & DRAWZ IlO0 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 October 19, 19 79 TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 Ms. Mary Marske, City Clerk City of Mound~ 5J=~°A~ Maywood Road Mound., Minnesota 55364 Re: Mileage Allowance Dear Mary: This will confirm our telephone conversation of this morning wherein you have referred me to Chapter 329, Section 2, Laws of 1979. I have checked, that law and enclose herewith a copy indicating that you are correct. The Legislature has removed, the 15 cent limitation, and the only limitation remaining is that the amount that the council allows cannot exceed that provided by the commissioner of personnel for state officers and employees. Very truly yours, CAP:ih Enclosure Curtis A. Pearson, City Attorney In checking with Barbara Sundquist, State Commissioner of Personnel the amount set for state officers and employees is currently 19 cents. The next scheduled change would occur in July of 1981 unless changed by the legislature prior to that date. It is recommended that a resolution be adopted making the increase effective November 1, 1979. CITY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnesota October 16, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-111 SUBJECT: Police Goals and Objectives The meeting to consider the Police Goals and Objectives has been established for Monday, November 19th, after the Water and Sewer Rate Study discussion. ~--'- L~onard L. Kopp cc: Chief Johnson CITY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnesota October 16, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-112 SUBJECT: Excess Copies The Council discussed ~ little the many sheets of paper sent. The attached is the minutes of the Watershed District. Some years ago, a Council asked these be sent as they come in. The September 20th Watershed Meeting had 16 pages to the minutes; the minutes have two items referring to Mound - page four and page seven. Only those two pages of the minutes are being sent. If the Council feels they would like the entire minutes, they can be furnished. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT September 20, 1979 The regular meeting was called to order on September 20, 1979 by Chairman Cochran at 7:00 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers present: Cochran, Lehman, Russell, Thomas and Gudmundson. Also present were board advisors Holmquist and Macomber. Approval of Minutes. The minutes of the regular meeting of August 16, 1979 were reviewed. Following discussion it was moved by Thomas, seconded by Lehman, that the minutes be approved as published. Upon vote the motion carried. Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project. The engineer reviewed the bids received by the district in response to its Advertisement for Bids for construction of the Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project. The engineer advised the managers that the bids were complete and submitted in accordance with the Advertisement for Bids and reviewed with the managers his evaluations of the bids received. Following discussion, Manager Russell offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Lehman. WHEREAS, the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on April 20, 1978, by resolution duly adopted, authorized and ordered the Basic Water and Land Management Improvement Project for Minpehaha Creek in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 112.48, Subd. 3, and WHEREAS, on July 19, 1979, the Board of Managers, by resolution duly adopted, approved final plans and specifications for the project and ordered preparation of all September 20, 1979 Page Four .G. Freund - Lake setback variance at 6705 Halsted Avenue, Halsted Bay, Lake / ....... .... ~Minnetonka - Mound; Application No. / Warren Phillips, Jr. - S~orel~i~ne--~-~p~p, Lakeview Drive, Upper Lake Minnetonka - Minnetrista; Application No. 79-118. George Ronald, Jr. - Shoreline rip-rap, 2480 Old Beach Road, Lafayette Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Orono; Application No. 79-119. Following discussion, it was moved by Russell, seconded by Lehman, that the above permits be approved and issued subject to all terms and conditions recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Centurion Co. - (Application to Amend) Grading/drainage plan for' "Amhurst'' Development - St. Louis Park, Hopkins; Application No. 79-21. The engineer reviewed the application of Centurion Co. to amend the above permit issued April, 1979. The engineer reviewed the modifications proposed in the previously approved drainage plan. The engineer adVised the managers that the proposed modifications were adequate because there is no increase in the rate of run-off from the site under 100 year storm conditions and recommends approval of the permit amend- ment. Irwin Mandell appeared before the managers and spoke in opposition to the permit amendments. Mr. Mandell submitted to the managers a petition in intervention of an unincorporated association calling itself Neighbors United for Responsible Development. Mr. Mandell stated that this unincorporated association was concerned regarding the impact of the project upon the natural resources of the site and its effect on wetlands and drainage patterns. Arthur Horowit~, a resident in adjacent Knollwood, appeared in opposition to the permit amendment and expressed concern regarding the impact of the development upon drainage problems in the Knollwood residential area. Jane Gordon from the Oakridge area also appeared in opposition to the permit amendment. Rick Sathre of McCombs, Knutson & Associates, consulting engineers to the developer, appeared before the managers and responded to managers' questions regarding those matters which had been brought Sept~m/ber 20, 1979 Pa~ Eight ! ! / st~ate Bank of Mound - Grading/Drainage/Plan, CSAH 15 and Kings Re'ad- Spring Park; Application No. 792116. The engineer reviewed tho"application for grading a d drainage plan approval for a detached banking facility. Th~engineer advised the manager's that the application was in c~nformity with all appl-i~'able standards of the district and r~ec~mmended appr_o~v.a~-c~ Following discussion, it was moved by Thom~.~seconded~by Russell, that the application be approved as recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Trinity Associates - Grading/Drainage Plan, Housing develop- ment near Parkers Lake - Plymouth; Application No. 79-117. The engineer reviewed the application for grading and drainage plan approval. The engineer advised the managers that the property drains to Parkers Lake and then to Basset's Creek, and that he had been advised by the engineer for the Basset's Creek Flood Control District that no permit would be required by that district. The engineer advised the managers that the application was in conformity with the applicable standards of the district. Gary Morris, a resident of adjacent property to the west of the applicant's site, appeared in opposition to the application. Mr. Morris explained that there was an existing pond on his and other adjacent property and expressed concern that the pond being constructed by the applicant, with a lower bottom elevation than the pond on his property, could lower water levels in the existing pond on Mr. Morris's property. Ken Haffner appeared on behalf of the applicant and answered questions from the managers regarding the application. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Thomas, that the application for the grading and drainage plan be approved and that the applicant be required to maintain the existing conditions of the adjacent pond to the west of the applicant's property. Upon vote the motion carried. City of Edina - Utley Park - Grading and Drainage P~an Approval for Parking Lot Expansion; Application No. 79-120. The engineer reviewed the application of the City of Edina to construct additional parking at Utley Park, south of 50th Street, west of Wooddale in the City of Edina. The engineer recommended approval of the application as submitted. 10-2~ CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota October 18, 1979 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 79-113 SUBJECT: Revenue Sharing Budget The Council tabled the Revenue Sharing Budget at the October 9th meeting. This memorandum is in case the Council wants to discuss it at the October 23rd meeting. ARt.AN STANG£LAN D GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION o[ pre ntatit e ~[~/nltt~r~, ~.(. 20515 October 16, 1979 The Honorable Tim Lovaasen Mayor City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mayor Lovaasen: Thank you so much for your letter regarding H.R. 3712, the Mortgage Subsidy Bond Tax Act of 1979. This bill has passed the Ways and Means Committee and should come before the full House for debate and final vote sometime this Fall. There are several alternative measures addressing this problem and the rule granted H.R. 3712 by the Rules Committee allows for a substitute bill to be offered as an amendment. Enclosed is a copy of the Moore Amendment, to be offered as a. substitu'~e, for your review. The problem here is the availability of money for housing mortgages, and I will keep your thoughts in mind when this is considered by the House of Representatives. If I can be of assistance anytime in the future, please feel free to call on me. With best regards, I am /erely, :~ . , . Arlan Stangeland ~ Member of Con§ress Enclosure DISCUSSION PO1NTS 'ON 'THE MOORE A}.tEND~3ENT TO H.R. 3712 - 1. Of the three amendments to be allowed on the House floor under the request by the Ways and 3~eans Committee to the : Rules Con~nit~ee, the Moore amendment will be first. ~y : amendment initially won by an 18 to 16 vote. It was then .' tabled, so long as I would be able to offer i't on the House floor. The 3~oore amendment: 0 a. Preserves the transition rules in H.R. 3712 as reported. b. Retains multi-family housing features in H.R. 3712 as reported. c. Keeps the veterans housing provisions as reported. d. Replaces the permanent rule for single-family home mortgage financing with an annual interest income exc}usion of $100 per taxpayer/S200 for those filing jointly so long as savings are plac~d in accounts /At /~,5~.dru~*~Og /59~ /ozgY~4~l~y for home mortgage, renovation,~or expansion.. , purposes. 2. Timing is right· Nearly 200 House members and a~ 41 % Senate Republicans have sponsored interest.,income ex- clusion legislation· Senator Danforth's bill receiving unanimous Senate Republican support uses the $100/$200 amounts of my amendment and provides an additional $400 exclusion if the interest is left in a savings ac6ount or used to purchase stock. Small savers are in a pinch that will not likely ease. Inflation is'now at 13%. Passbook rates are at 5.5%. '"Small Saver" certificates requiring a $100 minimum de- posit provide interest ranging from 5.7% for 3 months to 8,% for 8 years. Related savings forms a~proximate a 6% to 7% interest return. All fall far short of track- ing inflation meaning a large net loss to small savers who c'annot afford larger denomination money market certi- ficates. All financial institutions'get the same opportunity to use tax-free accounts. No preferential treatment will be given to any financial institution· All will be given an equal opportunity to use the exclusion. Currently savings deposits are dwindling rapidly. Only 5.3% of family disposable income is saved. Phil- osophy of buy today to avoid inflated-prices tomorrow is wide-spread. 6. In Brita Kat'i. ona. 1 Savings Ce-t5 t are tax-fr~ee .up to the e. quiva]ent of $2,237.50. ~ritish S~vings Bonds, Save As You Earn, ]';aiJonal Savings Bank accounts are iot~]ly tax free. In Germany, deposits at sav~ngs and loan associa- tions are-deductab~e based on family s~ze, veterans'stat~s, and other:~'factors. In Japan,-any person.receiving'either ~nterest'~o~ dii, idend income can 'chooSe to have this income taxed at flat 35% rate while it otherwise could be taxed ~gs high ~s 75~. Interest income from depo~{tk up to $15 000 ' is totally exempt. - · According to the Joi'nt Co~ttee on Taxation, my.amendment would produce a static loss of $2.2 billion in.]984. This compares >vith $2.14 revenue loss under the pe~-manent rule for single-family mortgages 'as reported by the Ways and ~Jeans Co~nitiee.'-Wans Economics, Inc. ~dvises .an unrestricted ~$100/$200 exclusion would fipd feedback effects reducing the ~c'tual revenue loss by One-third by the end of the first yea~ and ~ recapture of one-half expected losses thereafter. 'Personal saviDgs would grow under the $100/$200 exclusion by $1.2 billion 'annua]ly"ac~rding to Evans.Fconomics, Inc., and by two to .three times this amount according %o Dr. Michael Boskin of Stanford .Universi~y~ 10. 1979 Report of {he Joint Economic Committe~ features need for sav~ngs incentives staling this is an anti-inflation pro- tection. 11. 12. 13. Many older Americans on fixed incomes tel3 upon their small savings for emergency purpose. This helps to protect its erosion by inflation. ' Evans Economics, Inc. says an unrestricted exemption in the dollar amounts I have in the amendment would increase say,nas by 8.6%. · Federal Home Loan Bank Board repor2ed that April 1979 saw largest withdrawal from savings accounts under its juris- diction in history. Recent Federal Reserve Bulletin stated that October 1975--JAnuary 1979 period was the largest withdrawal of savings from banks since beginning its survey in 1965. mETROPOUTAN WAJ'TE cO L PUBLIC M£ET G flOT CE Three public meetings will be held to present the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant (MWTP) Study. It is an engineering study conducted for the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). The object of this study is to determine treatment needs and costs for the years 1982 (when the current con- struction program at the Metro Plant will be complete) through 2000. The study is one of several concurrent coordinated studies leading to an overall sewage management facilities plan for the seven county MWCC service area. The overall project is called the "201" plan, referring to section 201 of the federal Clean Water Act of 1972. The MWTP study addresses future treatment at the Metro Plant ("Pig's Eye" Plant). It includes alternative methods to gear plant, equipment and personnel to meet projected treatment quantities and water quality standards. The specific goal for water quality is to substantially reduce ammonia and chlorine residuals in the effluent; to improve river dissolved oxygen and solids levels; and to provide uninterruptable service. Attaining this goal will require renovation and rehabili- tation of older works, and addition of new treatment and other works. The. study does not address other sewage issues such as the ultimate fate of sludge, combined sewer overflows, collection system problems, hooking up to a sewer system, or the Metro Plant prior to 1982. A schedule of meetings that deal with some of these issues is attached. Costs for the Metro projects will be distributed among all MWCC sewer service users. Based on capital costs (in 1982 dollars) of $216,000,000 and, upon constrUc- tion, an additional $2,800,000 annually for operation and maintenance, the estimate is a $5.12 increase in annual charges to an average metropolitan household if federal and state grants are secured (or $24.35 annually if not). The Commission anticipates securing such grants and if so industrial rates would increase about 13% in the 1980's. This percentage would diminish if a revenue system were implemented for above average strength ammonia-bearing discharges to the system. The public meetings on the Metro Study will provide background on the plan, and a briefing on the preliminary results and alternatives it yielded. It will be an opportunity for the public to ask questions and offer ideas about the alternatives. The MWCC will then be able to consider these additional perspectives on the proposed projects while they are still in the planning stages. The public is invited to attend the meetings~ They will be held:'. Thursday, Nov. l, 7 p.m. Metropolitan Council Chambers Third Floor, Metro Square Bldg. 7th & Robert Sts. St. Paul, MN Monday, Nov. 5, 2 p.m. Hennepin County Govt. Center Meeting Room E-Lower Level ~300 South Sixth St., Minneapolis, MN WedneSday, Nov. 14, 7 p.m. Wabasha Middle School Library 611 Broadway, Wabasha, MN The study reports are available from the MWCC office (350 Metro Square Bldg., St. Paul). Report summaries are available on request from Christine Liemandt, MWCC, tel: 222-8423. Technical questions prior to or subsequent to the meeting may be directed to Hugh McConnell, MWCC project manager for the Metro Study, tel: 222-8423. Public meetings concerning various 201 studies are being held throughout the seven county area. Upcoming meetings include: Combined Sewer Overflow MWCC contact: Penny Loos Oct. 15, 2 p.m. Oct. 17, 2 p.m. Oct. 30, 7 p.m. Oct. 31, 7.p.m. Hennepin Co. Govt. Center Metropolitan Council Chambers Hennepin Co. Govt. Center Metropolitan Council Chambers Industrial Waste MWCC contact: Penny Loos Nov. 5, 7 p.m. Nov. 8, 7 p.m. Nov. 20, 7 p.m. Nov. 27, 7 p.m. Nov. 26, 7 p.m. Cottage Grove City Hall Anoka - Bunker Prairie Activities Center Hennepin Co. Govt. Center Metropolitan Council Chambers Shakopee - Minn. Federal Savings & Loan Service Area Six (primarily Washington Co.) MWCC contact: Penny Loos Oct. 25, 7 p.m. Oct. 29, 7 p.m. Nov. l, 7 p.m. Nov. 14, 7 p.m. Farmington City Hall Cottage Grove City Hall Rosemount City Hall Stillwater City Hall Northwest Area MWCC contact: Matt Gonring (Anoka and northern Hennepin Co.) Additional meeting dates not set at this time. Residual Solids Management MWCC contact: Matt Gonring (sludge, other sewage solids) Additional meeting dates not set at this time Southwest Area MWCC contact: Christine Liemandt (primarily southern and western suburbs) Additional meetings anticipated in late November. There will be public meetings on the integration of the above studies in January 1980. CITY of MOUND October 16, 1979 5341 MAYWOOD ROAD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 (612) 472-1155 Hr. "Bud" NoJan A1 & Alma's Supper Club 5201 Piper Road Mound, Mn. 55364 Bud: Attached is a copy of a letter from the Engineer, indicating what is left to be done on your parking area. Since it is so late in the Fall, I can see letting the stripping go until Spring but the curbs, either temporary or permanent and black: toppih9 should be done this Fall. We greatly appreciate your 'cooperation. ,Respec~fu l 1 y, Henry Truelsen Bldg. Inspector HT/dd October 15, 1979 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, llN. C CONSULTING ENG NEERS I~1 LAND SURVEYORS L"4 SITE PLANNE ~ ' iai' Mr. Leonard Kopp City Matlager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound A1 & Alma's Parking Dear Mr. Kopp: On October 12, I inspected A1 & Alma's parking by their building and across Tuxedo Road from the building. The following work has not been done as per the plan submitted on June 18, 1979. 1) Ail striping and fire land and No Parking painting. . ~2)' Curb on Tuxedo Road. 3) Curb on Piper Road. 4) Blacktop on west side of building. If you have any questions or need more information on this, please advise. Very truly yours, McCO~S-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS:sc Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls ATTORNEY AT LAW 1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55454 612/333-54~ 9 October 11, 1979 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY TIMOTHY L. PIEPKOPaN FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1979: hours 1. September 4th: 2 Jury Trials ............................................. 4.00 2. September 5th: meeting at Mound Office with citizen ...................... 1.00 3. September llth: 4 Pre-Trial Conferences; 1 Court Trial .............. ~ ..... 3~25 4. September 18th: Prepared 10 Formal Comp!aimts; preparation for Jury Trial. 5.00 5. September 19th: Jury Trial ................................................ 2.75 6. September 20th: Prepared 7 case dispositions for Chief; Probable Cause Hearing in Minneapolis for Mound Case .................................... 3.00 7. September 14, 15, 17: Research and prepared two legal briefs for Judge on Mound case (Trummer) 8.00 8. September 25: Arraignments, 4 Pre-Trial Conferences; 1 Court Trial ........ 3.25 9. September 27: Special Term Hearing for Trummer in Crystal ................. 1.'00 104-September 28: Calls to and from witnesses on Trummer case ................. 75 32.00 TOTAL BILL (15 hours at $300.00 plus 17 hours at $30.00 an Hour) ............ $810.00 Less Discount ............................................................... $310.00 TOTAL OWING .................................................................. TONI HAGEDORN 2ND DISTRICT, AGRICULTURE PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION ~NASHINGTON OFFICEI 440 CANNON HOUSE OFFI~'E BUILDING The Honorable Tim Lovaasen Mayor of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 DlSl~IC'I' 0WFICESt 2040 M~qK~T0 MALL ~ANKATO, MINNESOTA $6001 (507) 387-8226 2ll Sou'rH NEWTON STREEt' ALBERT LEA, ~V~INNE~OTA 56007 ($07) 377-1676 GEORGE L. BERG, JR. Dear Mayor Lovaasen: Thank you very much for your letter of October 2 regarding your interest in H.R. 3712, legislation to restrict the use of tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds for residential housing. The House Ways and Means Committee has been working on this bill for several months and reported out its final version on August 31. The bill is presently pending before the Rules Com- mittee and it is anticipated that it will be considered and re- ported to the House Floor for debate and a vote near the end of the month. This bill sets forth the conditions and limitations under which cities, counties and states may issue tax exempt revenue bonds for home ownership programs and other housing re- lated programs. There ~s a great deal of controversy associated with this bill and'some efforts are being made to completely prohibit the practice of municipalities being allowed to issue such bonds. Due.to the abuse of the practice in some areas of the country, the Committee believes that some type of federal regulation is needed. I can certainly understand the problems being faced by the Mound City Council and the citizens that you are trying to help. I informed the Committee of my interest in getting this bill settled so that Minnesota would not have its present pro- grams adversely affected. You may be assured, that I will continue to follow the progress of this bill and will keep the interest of our state and local programs and affected citizens in mind during the debate on this bill. Thank you again for writing. Please let me know when I may be of service to you or the Council in any way. Sincerely yours, Tom Hagedo~ Member of 'Congress TH:jf CLAYTON L. L£FEVERE HEREIERT P. LEFLER CURTIS A. PEARSON J. DENNIS O'BRIEN JOHN E. DRAWZ DAVID J. KENNEDY JOHN B. DEAN GLENN E. PURDUE JAMES D. LARSON CHARLES L. L£FEVERE HERBERT P. LEI~LER IE JEFFREY J. STRAND JAMES P. O'MEARA MARY J. SJORKLUND THOMAS D. CREIGHTON LAW OFFICES. LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ TELEPHONE (61Z) 333- 0543 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Continental Telephone Dear Leu: The major hearing of the Public Service Department on Contin- ental's rate increases had been set for NOvember 13 through November 16. This has now been cancelled. The new hearing dates have been set for January 8 through January 11, '1980. fCurrently I am~.i~undated with materials f~om-~h~ Attorney Gener~ ;~ffice and fr6~m the Office of Consumer Services wherein they are /requesting information of the company. To date I am not spending % ~ / any appreciable time on preparing this case, nor am I taking any _ \ \\ / affirmative steps to present a Case before the Department of Public \\ ~V ~ Ser~ce. I think the council should be aware of %his as we a~--~ ~ %3~as~umi~g a pretty passive role in our position as interveno~./-~ ~ ~J~u-rtis A. Pearson ~ City Attorney CAP: ms Enclosure -_~.,: =R BLDG. 7TH FLOOR A?,IERICA:'; October 12, ]979 ~OTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .EXCERPTED FROM THE DEPARTMENT'S WE,XLY CALENDAR Notice is hereby given that the Public Service Con~nission of Minnesota will hold a ~blic hearing on the following matter at the time(s) and place(s) shown: · !S., JANUARY 8, 1980 THRU FRIDAY~ JANUARY ll, .1.979.~ 9:30 a.m., IJ~RGE HEARING ROOM, 7TH iOR; AMERICAN CE~TER'BUILDING, 16~'~.] KELLOGG 8LVD., ST, PAUL: (Hearing Examiner )rge Deretich 612/296-8116) P 407 / GR-Y9-500 / PSC-79-146 CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF MINNESOTA, INC., 6053 Hudson Road, St. Paul, MN 55119: Evidentia~ Hearing regarding petition of Continental Telephone Co. for authority to,'change certain of its rates for telephone service furnished to its customers in the State of Minnesota. (Petitioner's Arty: John McNulty, Esq., 1800 Midwest Plaza, Minneapolis, MN 55402) (10-12-79) Minn. Stat. $ 15.052 (1976) requires that all contested cases be.hear, d b.y an .examiner ssigned by and governed by the rules of procedure of the Office of 'Hearing .Exam'Fners 4inn. Rules HE 201-299). Therefore, when a hearing date has been set on a contested riginal pleadings and motions (such as petitions to intervene, prefiled testimony, briefs, ,.quests for postponements) must be served on the hearing examiner at the Office of Hearing taminers, 1745 University AVenue, St. Paul, MN 55104, with 16 copies simultaneously filed~ ith the Secretary of the Public Service Con=nission, 790 American Center Building, 150 East ,.llogg :~oulevard, St. Paul, MN 55101; and a copy of said filinos must be served on aach ~rty of r~_ccrd. Please contact the hearing examiner, whose name appears "in parentheses ~?Wing the date and location ofhearing, for parties of record. Maf¥ L Harty Executive Secretary AN EQUAL O,~CORTUNITY EMPLOYEF~ ~At{T3IEET OF PUBLIC SEIIVICE 7TH FLOOR A:,IERICAN CENTER BLDG. ['-_ -'2,----' .? .~ --" r : ' - ' October 12, 1979 612/296-7124 .-._~ ....- NOTICE OF CANCELLATIO~( OR POSTPONEMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING EXCERPTED FROM THE COMMISSION'S WEEKLY CALENDAR Notice is hereby given by the Public Service Commission of Minnesota of the cancellation or postponement of the following previously scheduled hearing(s): FICE OF CANCELLATION - P 407 / GR-79-500 ~-PSC-79-146 CONTINENTAL TELEPHONE COMPANY ~!NNESOT~, INC., 6O53'Hudson~ Road~' SE. P'aul, MN ~§'ll9. '-Previ'6us)y schedulJd'for ' ~ember )3, 1979 thru November 16, 197g and November 19, 1979 in St. Paul, MN. (10-12-79) /vm Mary L. Hart¥ Executive Secretary AN EQUAL OPPORtUNitY EMPLOYEr Corporate Offices · 157,25 51innetm,ka ll()ulcvar~l * Minn,~tonka~ Minnesota 553t.3 * (612} 933-2.5,1-8 October 15, 1979 Gary K. Mayer School Board Chai~nan Westonka School District 277 5600 Lynnwood Boulevard Mound, Mn. 55364 DeathS. Mayer: We are in receipt of your letter dated October 11, 1979. We wish to express om' appreciation for yom' concern for the best i~terests of the youth of our community. Third Stone Music has been doing business'in Navarre now for over eight years. Throughout those years, we have been selling the same product lines. Namely, records and tapes, m~ic instruments and supplies, waterbeds and smoking accessories (pipes, papers, etc.). Not once in those eight years have we ever experienced any problems with the sale of our sraoking accessories. Naturally, as you n~ght expect, we are quite surprised over the recent public interest in banning the sale of so cal2ed-drug related accessories typically found in stores such as Third Stone Music. Since it's first day of business Third Stone Music has always re- stricted the sale of smoking accessories to those people under the age of sixteen. Because of the recent concern o£ some citizens in some of the conmm~ities in which we operate om' music stores, Third Stone Music has instituted a new restrictive policy regarding the sale o£ smoking acc- . essories to those people under the age of eighteen. This company policy went into effect June 1st of this year. I hope other merchm~ts in our conmunity would voluntarily adopt such restrictive procedures as Third Stone Music has already done. It w2y surprise you to know that over 95g of marijuana smoked today is done so with the use of rolling papers, not pipes. These items of course are widely sold in grocery stores, drug stores, service stations, etc. throughout the ccxrmunity. -2- You would be interested to know that the over all question of the legality of certain types of smoking pipes is now before the United States District Cotu-t Of Appeals in St. Louis, Missouri. In the case of the "City of Egan" vs. "Makin Magic", we hope the courts will be able to quickly resolve this important issue to the satisfaction of all involved. We will fully comply with any decision of the courts. It i~ hoped for , by the way, . that a decision will be handed down sometime in January 1980. If you wish to ftu~ther enlighten yourself with this issue, I suggest we meet sometime that would be convenient. The issue is complicated and not one that lends itself to simple easy solutions. The survival of Third Stone Music, the services it provides the connmnity and the over 50 jobs it supplies are at stake. If I personally can be of any further assistance to you or the con~nunity, feel free to contact ~ any time. ~ensen Third Stone Music, Inc. cc Superintendent Dale E. Fisher Mayor & City Councils of: Mound Spring Park Minnetrista ;- Orono Editors: Mpls. Star Lake Minnetonka Sun The Laker Mound High School Paper (Smoke Signal - Ben Abrison) Orono High School Paper (ITA - student editor) Orono School Beard Orono Chief of Police Enc. o Mr. Tim Swensen President Third Stone Music, Inc. 15325 Minnetonka Blvd. ' Minnetonka, MN 55343 September 19, 1979 Dear Tim, I have carefully been following the newspaper stories in regard to the 'Eagan Case', and would like to offer my testimonial in behalf of Third Stone Music, Inc. The music industryn~s' - unfortunately. ~ained reputation and notoriety as being corrupt and drug- ridden. I would like to point out a side now that to my knowledge has never been made public. Your efforts to achieve an air of 'professionalism' in your retail units. What the general public is not aware of, is your extensive efforts to screen employees prior to hiring. In addition to the standard interviewing questions (at the store level, and by my professional Interviewers ~nd Polygraph Examiners) we extensively cover use (if any), frequency, and sale of any illegal drugs or narcotics including marijuana. Although we discuss this 'touchy area' with every job applicant the information we receive is then verified by a Polygraph Examination or extensive Background Investigations regardless of the position applied for. In addition to pre-employment screening, my organization periodically interviews your existing employees (from top management to part-time sales person) and one topic discussed in detail is illegal drug use or sales. Our standard periodic interviewing form for your organization contains the following question; cont. cont. page two Since February 1979, have you used or sold illegal drugs on this companies premises? I would like to point out that this program was instituted in February of 1979, however any illegal act was never approved or condoned by management. Since you first implemented this screening program, many job applicants were denied employment at Third Stone Music, Inc. because of their extensive drug use and experimentation. To the best of my knowledge since February of 1979 we have not discovered any cases in which drugs have been sold on Third Stone premises. By instituting the controls described above, your organization certainly stands out, however it has recently come to my attention that other companies such as yours are now following suit, and policing their own stores. I am confident that when people realize that your products are not being indescriminately sold to minors they will better appreciate the situation. Prof~~lly Yours, Scbtt D. Moro President SDM/pj 0:¢ oo POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT Cities of MOUND, SPRING PARK, . Month Sep_~. MINNETRISTA & ST. BONIFACIUS Year I___93_9 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMI%'IARY THIS YEAR LAST. YEAR ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Traffic control (cltation~ & warnings) 356 3893 4898 .' - DWI . 5 59 76 Property dal~age accident 15. 212 211 Personal injury accident 4 5i 94" Fatal accident ! 3 2 Adult felony & misdemeanor arrests 23 I 168 158 ]'uvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests 19 141 98 Medicals 26 180 190 Animal complaints 179 1269 1240 Part I & Part II offenses 143 810 878 Other general investigations ~02 7626 753~ TOTAL 1173 14,412 15,379 ~'II. ~"PROPERTY LOSS/OCOVERY SUMMARY 1 cities c6mbined ITEM Bikes Boats $lothing ;urrency, notes, etc. [eweiry,& precious metals ~UllS Home !~ur nishings .' {adio & Electronic equipment Vehicle's & vehicle equipment Miscellaneous TOTAL STOLEN 306 44o 140 107 56,807 35,000 I ,900 929 26,479 i 1,473 $ 133,581 RECOVERE. D 150 ' 200 ! ,900 24,680 ! ,186 $ 28,116 ./ All cities combined. OFFENSE ACTIVITY SUMMARY PART I CRIMES.,O ~ Adult ~uv. Honui cide . . Rape .... Robbery , Larceny, . , ~5 ~5 J ~ 10 Vch~cle Theft ., , lO ]0 ] , 2 TOTAL · 80 · 0 80 ~ 6 ]2 :PART II CRIMES' ?.imple ~ks sau.lt - ,i 7 .. Forgery- &' ~ounterfe~ting 1. 1 I ' Embezzlement Stolen P~p~erty ~andalism ....... Prostltutlon k ~ommerc~aliz'ed ~[ce . Sex Offenses -_ Offenses agMnst family, k children' ~rlv[ng under the ~nfluence , public Peace ,~, All other o~fenses .... 1 1 S. TOTA ~ TOTAL PART I k PART II CRIMES , 1/~3 0 1/~3 10 City of Hound Month September Yea r 1_q7_.9_ I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY ACTIVITY traffic control (citations & warnlngs) DWI Property damage accident Personal injUry accident fatal accident Adult felons;- & misdemeanor arrests fuvenile felony & n~isdemeanor arrests Medicals Animal complaints Hart I & Hart II offenses Other general investigations FO TAb THIS MON TH 221 '9 14 20 116 82 162 634 YEA R TO DA TE 2299 32 108 24 102 97 123 929 510 4791 9016 LAST YEAR TO DATE 2544 . .43 101 49 0 89 75 118 917 575 4685 9196 EHLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS :IRSTNATIONAL'SO0 LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 33§-8291(AREACOOE 6121 October l, 1979 Financial Consultants: Ehlers and Assoc.iates lease distribute to governing body members DOW-JONES BOND INDEX: 7.22% DOW JONES MUNICIPALS 8 The economic news is starting to register: The early September bond market softened considerably, especially for long matur- ing issues. Prices of precious metals have skyrocketed allegedly because of heavy Arab buying. Maybe they aren't telling us everything they know. The casualty insurance companies are largely out of the tax exempt market until they assess recent hurricane damage, at a time when massive housing issues are hitting the market. WEEKLY AVERAGE OF TWENTY 20-YEAR BONDS e LAST WEEK 7.22% ,,,8111 ;,,;/ THE WALL STREET ,JOURNAL ~onday, September 10, lg79 This demonstrates that, indeed, too many tax exempt bonds of all kinds can drive up interest rates for all public purposes. State and local governments ought to be sparing in letting others use their tax exemption. Probably after the waves of'school, hospital, power generation, utility, refunding and housing financings, the next major thrust will be that of rebuilding the cities. Sure, we've had redevelopment projects heavily financed by the federal government, but many of these haven't worked out too well (possible. because of the "free" money). The federal money has largely dried up and cities will have to do it on their own. It's not just a big city problem - many sewers, waterworks, streets and other facilities are over 100 years old. It will be a tremendous task communicating this to your constituents because many take for granted those conveniences they've had for a lifetime. Cities can get old and die unless they are revitalized from time to time. Tax increment financing will play a large part in this revitalization. Very truly~v, ours, MINNESOTA Chanhassen 7/2/79 Roseau 7/2/79 Warroad 7/2/79 Nicollet County 7/9/79 Mountain Iron 7/9/79 Carver County 7/9/zg Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority 7/10/79 Apple Valley 7/12/79 St. James 7/16/79 Ortonville 7/16/79 Maple Grove 7/16/79 Maple Grove 7/16/79 Parkers Prarie, ISD #547 7/16/79 Wayzata 7/11/79 Wayzata 7/17/79 Paynesville 7/17/79 Hastings 7/17/79 Mound 7/18/79 White Bear Lake 7/18/79 Waite Park 7/18/79 Maplewood 7/19/79 Maplewood 7/19/79 Osseo ISD #279 7/24/79 Ramsey County 7/24/79 Redwood County 7/24/79 Dilworth 7/25/79 Redwood Falls 7/26/79 Albert Lea 7/30/79 Cosmos 8/2/79 Pine City 8/6/79 Plymouth 8/6/79 Moorhead 8/6/79 Martin County 8/7/79 Fairmont 8/7/79 Coon Rapids 8/7/79 Byron 8/7/79 Kasson 7/9/79 Woodbury 8/8/79 Woodbury 8/8/79 Forest Lake 8/13/79 Barnesville 8/13/79 Barnesville 8/13/79 Monticello 8/13/79 Watson 8/13/79 Watson 8/13/79 Stewartville 8/14/79 Crookston 8/14/79 Gaylord, I.S.O. #732 8/14/79 Minnesota Higher Education 8/14/79 Coordinating Board Minnesota Higher Education 8/14/79 Coordinating Board Oslo 8/14/79 Kinney 8/14/79 Willmer 8/15/79 Rogers 8/20/79 Belle Plaine 8/20/79 North Mankato 8/20/79 Milaca - 8/21/79 K-ittson County 8/21/79 Metropolitan Transit Area 8/22/79 Winnebago 6/27/79 Red Wing 8/27/79 Mpls. Special School 8/28/79 District No. 1 tittle Canada 8/29/79 Western Lake Superior 8/30/79 Sanitary District WISCONSIN Kenosha 7/2/79 Menomenie 7/2/79 Onalaska 7/10/79 Stevens Point 7/16/79 Hudson 7/16/79 Random Lake 7/18/79 Milton School District 7/23/79 Mukwonago 7/24/79 Janesvilte 7/30/79 Pewaukee 8/6/79 Green Bay 8/7/79 Lodi School District 8/7/79 Hartford 8/7/79 Pleasant Prairie 8/13/79 West Grant School District 8/15/79 State of Wisconsin 8/21/79 IOW__A Humboldt School District 8/2/79 Muscatine 8/14/79 Waterloo 8/15/79 NORTH & SOUTH DAKOTA Casselton, ND 7/g/79 Freemen, SD 7~25/79 Brookings, SD 7/31/79 South Dakota Student 8/1/79 Loan Associaton Minot, ND 8/6/79 Sioux Falls, SO 8/6/79 SUrIM~RX OF AREA BOND SATES Years of Net Dow-Jones Bond ]~vp9 o~f_B_q~!d_~ _An!_o~n~t Maturit~ Rate Index Ratin~ G.O. Temporary Improvement $3,300M 82 5.71% 6.76% Baa-1 Electric Utility Revenue 400M 81/90 6.07% 6.76% NR G.O. Temporary ln,provement 1,300M 81 5.66% 6.76% NR State-Aid Highway I,O00M 80/89 5.439% 6.76% A G.O. Sewer & Water Revenue 2,000M 80/83 5.520% 6.76% A G.O. State-Aid Road gOOM 80/92 5.564% 6.76% A First Mortgage Revenue 6,500M 82/2006 6.756% 6.76% Baa-I General Obligation 4,245M 80/2000 5.931% 6.76% Baa-) G.O. Improvement 425M 81/90 5,464% 6.81% A G.O. Electric, Water & Sewer Rev. 445M 82/95 ' 5.866% 6.81% Baa-1 G.O. hnprovement 2,140M 81/2001 5.882% 6.81% A G.O. State-Aid Highway 1,100M 80/90 5.612% 6.81% A G.O. School Building 1,520M 82/98 6.016% 6.81% Baa G.O. Improvement 360M 82/9l 5.876% 6.81% Aa G.O. Redevelopment 350M 90/2002 5.876% 6.81% Aa G.O. Improvement 490M 82/96 5.84% 6.81% Baa~l G.O. Improvement 1,190M 82/91 5.532% 6.81% A G.O. Improvement 3,100M 82/96 5.746% 6.81% A G.O. Improvement 2,725M 82/2001 5.752% 6.81% A G.O. Improvement 655M 81/98 5.92% 6.81% Baa-l G.O. Temporary Improvement 3,420M 82 5.56% 6.81% A-1 G.O. Improvement 825M 80/99 5.86% 6.8)% A-I G.O. School Building ll,220M 81/95 5.687% 6.86% A G.O. Open Space 2,600M 81/95 5.417% 6.86% Aaa G.O. Drainage 625M 81/95 5.649% 6.86% A-1 Improvement Series 1979-1 760M 82/99 6.029% 6.86% Baa-1 G.O. Improvement l,lOOM 82/96 5.759% 6.86% A G.O. Improvement 2,000M 82/91 5.47)% 6.95% A-1 G.O. Improvement 650M 82/94 6.13% 6.95% NR G.O. Sewerage System Revenue 400M 82/2000 6.266% 6.86% Baa-1 G.O. Improvement 7,000M 81/90 5.454% 6.86% A-1 Residential Mortgage Revenue 20,O00M 81/200I 7.078% 6.86% A-I Drainage Unlimited Tax 1,335M 81/2000 5.753% 6.86% A-1 Improvement Series 1979 1,650M 82/96 5.582% 6.86% A-1 G.O. Temporary Improvement 4,150M 82 5.496% 6.86% A G.O. Improvement 460M 81/90 5.56% 6.86% A G.O. Municipal Bldg. 10DM 8)/90 5.90% 6.76% NR G.O. Improvement 3,150M 80/89 5.75% 6.86% Baa-1 G.O. Water Revenue 1,070M 81/2000 6.04% 6.86% Baa-1 G.O. Improvement 570M 81/89 5.874% 6.86% Baa Electric Revenue 300M 82/2001 6.434% 6.86% Baa-1 G.O. Improvement 230M 82/96 6.042% 6.86% Baa-1 G.O. Improvement 1,170M 82/91 5.613% 6.86% A G.Oo Sewer & Water Revenue 80M 82/96 6.75% 6.86% NR G.O. Improvement 20M 82/96 6.75% 6.86% NR G.O. Improvement, Series B 350M 82/91 5.719% 6.86% A Improvement Series 1979-1 400M 82/91 5.553% 6.86% A School Building Bonds 775M 82/99 5.908% 6.86% A Medical & Osteopathy 1,lOOM 89 6.239% 6.86% NR Student Loan Revenue Bonds Series 1979 IO0,ODOM 82/91 6.135% 6.86% A G.O. Temporary Improvement 1,500M 80 5.79% 6.86% NR Sewer & Water Revenue 225M 80/82 5.798% 6.86% Baa-1 G.O. Improvement 1,300M 8)/90 5.560% 6.86% A G.O. Improvement 475M 81/~000 6.212% 6.90% Baa Improvement Series 1979-1 )85M 82/96 6.372% 6.90% Baa-1 G.O. Improvement 360M 81/90 5.730% 6.90% A G.O. Improvement 690M 81/95 6.068% 6.90% Baa-1 G.O. Short Term Water System 823M 82 5.875% 6.90% NR G.O. Certificates of Indebt. 9,000M 81/89 5.580% 6.90% Aa Improvement Series 1979-1 31SM 82/96 5.995% 6.99% A G.O. Improvement 550M 81/90 5.594% 6.99% Aa Certificates of Indebt. 12,000M 80 5,995% 6.99% Au~ Temporary Improvement 1,575M 82 6.21% 6.99% Baa General Obligation 2,lSOM 81/96 5.952% 6.99% A-) Waterworks Mortgage Revenue 1,600M 81/92 5.662% 6.76% A-1 Corporate Purpose Unlim. lax 1,565M 81/98 5.796% 6.76% A Promissory Notes 1,O00M 80/88 5.494% 6.76% A Corporate Purpose 1,650M 82/97 5.447% 6.81% Aa G.O. Promissory 1,250M 81/88 5,474% 6.81% A Sewage System Mortgage Rev. 260M 82/97 6.313% 6.81% NR G.O. School Bonds 2,200M 84/94 5.547% 6.86% A-1 Waterworks 850M 80/94 5.687% 6.86% A Corporate Purpose Series 1979-A 5,400M 80/91 5.318% 6.95% Aa Promissory Notes of 1979 1,380M 80/89 5.55% 6.86% A School Bonds I,TIOM 81/89 5.192% 6.86% Aa G.O. School Bonds 765M 80/89 5.436% 6.86% A-1 Promissory Notes 2,160M 80/89 5.455% 6.86% Baa-I Pollution Control Revenue 26,000M 2004/09 6.503% 6.86% NR School Building Bonds 845M 8~/98 5.937% 6.86% A Student Loan Rev. Obligation 40,O00M 80/97 6.345% 6.90% A School Building Bonds 750M 83/87 5.262% 6.95% NR Electric Ney., Series 1979 50,O00M 90/2013 6,650% 6.86% A Corporate Purpose 1,735M 81/91 5.291% 6.86% Aa Refunding Improvement 730M 80/97 5.895% 6.76% Baa-I G.O. Sewer 310M 81/99 5.987% 6.86% NR G.O. Hospital 1,430M 81/99 5.769% 6.95% A-) Student Loan Revenue 52,)00M 80/95 6.46% 6.95% Temp. Improve. Warrants 2,079M 80 6.195% 6.86% NR G.O. Water Reclamation 5,000M 81/95 5.337% 6.86% Aa ( ( W TERS ED D STRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD O1: MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. · R. Dale Palmatier * Albert L. Lehman · James S. Russell · Jean Williams LAKE MINNETOHKA WATERSHED BOUNDAR~ ./ October 11, 1979 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING OF BOARD OF Thursday, October 18, 1979 7:30 P.M. Wayzata City Hall MANAGE RS 2. 3. 4. AGENDA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District October 18, 1979 Wayzata City Hall 7:00 p.m. Call to order; present, absent, staff. Reading and approval of minutes of regular meeting, 9/20/79. Approval or amendment of October 18, 1979 agenda. Hearing of permit applications: A. 73-55. G. Johnson - Fill permit renewal Halstead Bay, Lake Minnetonka - Minnetrista. 76-97. R. Askeland - Setback variance permit renewal, 2059 Dickson Avenue - Spring Park. Ce 78-42. DeGregory, Crist, Ellis- Rip-rap permit renewal at 2699 Kelly Avenue - Excelsior. De 78-103. G. Eklof - Rip-rap permit renewal at Lot 4, Block 10, Douglas Beach Addition - Minnetrista. Ee 79-36. Berry Island Co. - Placement of utilities in the Autumn Ridge Subdivision - Minnetonka. Fe 79-99. R. Fisher - Amendment to a setback variance permit, Lake Zumbra - Victoria. Ge 79-121. C. Kuntz - Rip-rap placement along Minnehaha Creek, 5437 Woodcrest D~ive - Edina. He 79-122. Four Wheels West - Grading/drainage plan for the expansion of a commercial building - Minnetonka. I. 79-123. W. Carlson - Withdrawn. J. 79-124. J. Dill - Rip-rap Arm' Road- West Arm, L~ke~M~.~nne~c~nlf-~--J'-'~'~ng K. 7~9-125~ ~.~' Widme~~- Grading/drainage plan for the //6onstruction o'f a building and parking lot, Lot 26, ~LaFayette Park - Mound. iL. 79-126. City of Chanhassen - th~ lowering of Pope Pond, State Highway 7 and Sandpiper Trail - Chanhassen. Me 79-127. W. Morton - Grading/drainage plan, south of Post Road and east of Crosby Road - Minnetonka. Ne 79-128. H. Bergquist - Grading/drainage plan, east of County Road 44 - Minnetrista. 79-129. Duraps, Inc. - Grading/drainage plan, North of County Road No. 16, east of Linbergh Drive - Minnetonka. P. 79-130. City of St. Louis Park - Construction of a pedestrian bridge across Minnehaha Creek on the north side of Excelsior~_Bou!~_y~_ard - St. Louis Park. Q/.~79-131. ~ity-~f Mound - Placement oi--%~ci--~i-t%,9~, ~, ~ various locations - Mound. ~ ~~ ~%-~~2~City of Mound - ~r~ng/dra~i~h~ plan for .... / [ street ex~S~6~i"-I~~s Lane - Mo~d. ~ ......... ~ 5. ~spondence. ............... ~ ....... 6. Hearing of requests for petitions by public for action by the Watershed District. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney. A. Treasurer's Report - Mr. Russell. (1) Administrative Fund Report. (2) Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project Fund Report. B. Engineer's Report - Mr. Holmquist. (1) Cooperative Agreement Project. C. Attorney' s Report - Mr. Macomber. (1) Water Resources Board/Potential Amendments to Chapter 112. Old Business. A. Private vehicular bridge at 11907 Cedar Lake Road. B. Upper Watershed Storage and Retention Project. C. District regulation revision. 9. New Business. 10. Adjournment. 6800 Cedar Lake Rd., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426, 545-6767 August 29, 1979 Dear Mayor and Council Members, This letter is to provide you with budget information regarding our request of $2,620 in continuing support for the Westonka Counseling for Older Adults program for 1980. In 1979, the City of Mound allocated the requested $1,224 for the six month period of July 1 - December 31, 1979. In 1980 the budget request is for a 12 month period, January 1 - December 31, 1979, rather than a six month period. This $2,620 budget request reflects a 7% cost of living increase and an increase from a 6 month funding period in 1979 to a 12 month period in 1980. The City of Mound's allocation is used in the transition from federal grant based funding to local participation in funding this service. All seven of the municipalities (Orono, Mound, Spring Park, Minnetrista, Maple Plain, Independence, and St. Bonifacius) in- cluded in the service area of Westonka Counseling for Older Adults program are participating in funding this service. The Westonka Counseling for Older Adults program is effectively serving Mound older adult residents. Since the start of the counseling program, 28 older adults from Mound have received individual counseling which assists an older adult in coping with problems and issues such as depression, coping with a physical disability, and feelings of grief. The average duration of individual counseling is for 11 months, 3 times a month. Additional services have been provided to Mound older adults, such as group counseling, family counseling, providing information and making referrals to other community resources such as blood pressure check-ups, senior citizens clubs, and congregate dining programs. Enclosed for your information is a copy of a letter I received from an older adult who received services from the Westonka Counseling for Older Adults program. The client's name has been deleted to maintain confidentiality. I am also enclosing information on the Westonka Counseling program goals and objectives, projected budget, com~uniuy cost breakdown, staffing, and a map of the service area. Your on-going support is an important step in providin~ counseling services for older adults. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Marlin Wollwage P~oject Director ^ tlnitcd Way ,~gcncy ~estonka Counselin? for Cider Adults Goals of the Project *To help senior citizens cope ~ith e~otional stress and physical chanmes ths. t accompany the aginf process. *To minimize health expenditures by preventing or intervenin~ in the de- teriorating affects of isolation and~ eventual institutionalization of senior citizens. *To increase the s~lf concept of th~ senior citizens so that they will be ~etter utilized and allowed to participate more fully as a valuable r~sourcc of the co~unity. *To provide a liason service between the senior citizen and existing community resources. 1980 Objectives of the ~roject *To provide individual counseling to 5~ older adults. *To provide group counseling to 125 older adults. *To provide outreach services to 200 older adults. Problematic Examples Services ~rovided Crisis - Immediate Need Spouse Death A!coholis~ Suicide I!utrition t!ome Placement Role Change as a Result of Significant Loss Productivity Health Illness Loneliness Depression Guilt Sexuality in '~,~ ~.mpty Nest Syndrome Growth Potential Mot im. mediate need: Life's Role Changes Retirement Increase in unco~aitted time Change in Daily Life Structure Acing Adjustment Individ~um 1 Counseling CJr our Counseling. Family Counselin~ Proble~ Solving Information and Referral Discussion Groups f~onversation and Coffee ~c~ H 0 0 i-...~ ('3 0 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 ! o f~ 0 .i-~ 1980 Community Cost ~reakdown Westonka Counseling for Older Adults Total OVer % of Area pOpulation 55 Seniors % 65 Below Cost Per Poverty Community Level Independence 2491 299 ?.9% Orono 7235 1135 30% $670 29% $2,570 30% Minnetris ta 329 ~ 519 14% $1,200 30% Mound 8967 1148 3G.6% $2,620 33% St. Boni 806 126 3.5% $300 38% Spring Park 1603 276 7.5% $640 29% Maple Plain 1312 240 6.5% $560 15% Total 25,713 3,743 100% $8,560 Cost per Senior = $2.27 Cost per Area Resident = .32 Based on I~77~population overview by Metro Council, November"'19'7'7' *Cost Based on Percentage Amounts of Seniors Within Community Westonka Counseling Project BOOKKEEPER 1/A time COUNSELOR full time PROJECT DIRECTOR 1/4 time COUNSELOR full time VOLUnTeER(S) FRIENDLY VISITORS time Varies PSYCHIATRIC (MENTAL HEALTH) CONSULTANT 12 hrs per year SECRETARY 1/4 time __ SUBURBAN COMMUNITY SERVICES 6800 Cedar l. ake Rd., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426, 545-6767 Westonka Counseling for Older Adults Service Area Independence ~le Plain Minnetrista Mound [ Spring Park Orono