The URL can be used to link to this page

80-03-11 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota AGENDA CM 80-91 CM 80-94 CM 80-92 CM 80-93 CM 80-99 CM 80-98 CM 80-97 CM 80-95 CM 80-96 Mound City Council March 11, 1980 7:30 P.M. City Hall 1. Public Hearings A. 1980 Streets (Continued) Pg. 597 B. Water Along Westedge Boulevard (Continued) ~--~_C. Delinquent Utility Bills Pg. 595-596 2. Planning Commission Recommendations Pg. 577-594 · 3. County Road 110 Pg. 576 4. Harvest Pantry Co-op Pg. 572-575 5. Water Rates Pg. 567-571 6. Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 7. Licenses and Permits A. Cigarette License Renewal Pg. 566 B. Bingo Permit Request Pg. 565 8. Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 6, Block 7, Woodland Point Pg. 564 9. Payment of Bills 10. Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 529-563 11. Committee Reports Pg. 598 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March ll, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-103 SUBJECT: Deferred Assessments Attached is a copy of a letter from the City Clerk-Treasurer regarding an application for deferred assessments for a qualifying resident of Mound. Council action is required in order to defer the assessments. -[:eoOard L. Kopp CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March II, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-102 SUBJECT: Cigarette License - Addendum to CM 80-97 Renewal of cigarette license for Surfside, Inc. has been received. Leonard L. Kopp . ~ebruary 20, 1980 Mr. Leonard L. Kopp Mound City Mana§er 5341Maywood Road Mound~ MN 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp; The Hennepi'n County Crimi'nal Justi'ce Coordilnating Council CHCCJCC) held a special meett'ng on'February]4, ~980, for the purpose of briefing representatives from units of §overnment wi'thi'n Hennep~n County on the Justice System Improvement Act of ~979 [JSlAI, ' At that spec~al.meetin§~..the.HCCJCC reviewed the briefing document entitled RE-AUTHORIZATION OF THE LEAA PR@GRAM which had been sent to all units of govern- ment in the Count~by the County~ Office of Planning and Development on February 6~ 1980. ~ollowing a review of that document and an extended discussion of the opt%on~ ayatlable to uni'ts of §overn~ent within the County, the Council adopted the following resolutton and d!~rected !ts Executive Committee to forward this recommendation to tts member units of government: The HCCJCC rece~ends that {ts member un~ts, of government continue to participate under t~e new LEAA Legislation as a joint Hennepin County, C~ty o~Mi~neap~li~and suburban unit of gove~ent combination entitle- ~nt jurisdiction and ~t 9s ~urther reco~ended that a continued dis- cussion and exploration ~f a viable balance-of-state concept be P~Z~sued w~th representatives of other ~nits of government within the Metropoli- tan ~rea and the Crime C~ntrol Planning Board. As indicated duri~ng the special briefing, on February 14, units of local govern- ment must ~ormally advise the M~nnesota Crime Control Planning Board of their in- tentions regard?ng parti~cipati'on undew the new LEAA Legislation by March 10, 1980. Therefo~e~ and i?n accord with the above recommendation, the HCCJCC' is recommend- ?ng consideration of the enclosed resolution. Y'ou are requested to present this resolution for consideration to your City Council and reminded that the results. of such action must be commun?cated to the Crime Control Planning Board by ~arch. 30. We are also requesttng that a record of that action be forwarded to the attention of our staff at A-2308 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN 55487 TO assist you !n pwesenting this resolution, we have also enclosed a Summary Fact Sheet hilghlight~ng key points of information on this issue. If you have any questions regarding thts process or the enclosures, please do not hesitate to con- tact our staff at 348-3069. On behalf of the HCCJCC may we thank you in advance for your consideration of th!s recommendation. ~ Si~nCerely~ C. Way-ne Courtney~ Co-Chairman Edina Councilman Thomas L. Johnson, Co-Chairman Nennep!n County Attorney Enclosures A.2308 Government Center, 300 S. Sixth St., Minneapolis, MN 55487, 348.6497 SAMPLE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Justice System Improvement Act of 1979 (JSIA) reauthorizes and restructures the LEAA Federal Grant-In-Aid Program to state and local units of government; and, WHEREAS, certain units of local general government are eligible individually or in combination to function under the JSIA as entitlement jurisdictions and in that status enjoy significant autonomy with respect to the utilization of a pre-determined allocation of federal funding; and, WHEREAS, Units of government within the State of Minnesota must formally advise the Minnesota Crime Control Planning Board of their intentions regarding participation in the JSIA no later than March 10, 1980; BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of formally declares its inten- tion to participate in the JSIA as'a member of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (HCCJCC) under a joint Hennepin County, City of Minneapolis and suburban unit of government combination entitlement jurisdiction; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in the event the Minnesota Crime Control Plan- ning Board proposes an alternative to entitlement jurisdiction status which maintains the integrity of pre-determined.funding allocations and provides for the maintenance of cooperative intergovernmental planning and coordination as embodied in the HCCJCC, such a proposal will be considered by the City of at that time. SUMMARY FACT SHEET THE FEDERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR THE OLD LAw ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRA- TION PROGRAM (LEAA) EXPIRED ON SEPTEMBER 3.0, 1979. LEGISLATION REAUTHORIZING, EXTENDING AND RESTRUCTURING THE LEAA PROGRAM WAS SIGNED INTO LAW BY THE PRESIDENT ON DECEMBER 27, 1979. THE NEW LEAA LEGIS- LATION IS KNOWN AS THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1979 (JSIA). UNDER THE JSIA CERTAIN UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT QUALIFY INDIVIDUALLY OR COMBINATION TO FUNCTION AS ENTITLEMENT JURISDICTIONS. THOSE UNITS OF GOVERN- MENT ELECTING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE JSIA AS AN ENTITLEMENT MUST NEET CERTAfN LEGISLATIVELY MANDATED REQUIREMENTS. THEY ALSO ENJOY A SIGNIFICANT LEVEL OF AUTONOMY REGARDING TtIE ESTABLISHMENT OF PRIORITIES AND THE ALLOCATION OF FEDERAL FUNDS RECEIVED UNDER THE PROGRAM. ELIGIBLE UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHICH ELECT NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN EHTITLE- MENT STATUS MAY AUTOMATICALLY PARTICIPATE UNDER A "BALANCE-OF-STATE" CONCEPT. AT THIS POINT, A FULL DEFINITION OF THE BALANCE-OF-STATE CONCEPT IS NOT AVAILABLE. ELIGIBLE UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT MUST FORMALLY DECLARE TH,EIR INTENTIONS REGARDING ENTITLEMENT STATUS BEFORE MARCH lO, 1980. · WHILE THERE MAY BE CERTAIN ADVANTAGES TO PARTICIPATION IH THE JSIA UHDER THE BALANCE-OF-STATE CONCEPT, IN THE ABSENCE OF SUFFICIENT INFOF¥~AT~ON AIID ACCORD WITH THE MARCH 10, 1980, DEADLINE, IT IS RECOt.!MENDED TtlAT UNITS OF GOVERNMENT WITNIN HENNEPIN COUNTY DECLARE THEIR INTENT TO PARTICIPAIE AS MEMBERS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATING COUIICIL UNDER A JOINT HENNEPIN COUNTY, CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND SUBURBAN UNIT OF GOVERNMEIII' COMBINATION ENTITLEMENT JURISDICTION STATUS. THIS ACTION, OF COURSE, PROTECTS LOCAL INTERESTS AND AS SOON AS FULL INFORMA- TION IS AVAILABLE FROM THE STATE REGARDING THE BALANCE-OF-STATE CONCEPT, RECONSIDERATION OF THIS ORIGINAL DECLARATION CAN OCCLIR AT THAT TIME. WITH RESPECT TO THE BALANCE-OF-STATE CONCEPT, THE HENNEPIN COUNTY CRININ?~L JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND STAFF ARE WORKING UITtt REPRESENTATIVES FROM F)THER UNITS OF GOVERNMENT WI'FH]N TIlE METROPOLITAN ARFA AND FROM TIlE CR|~.IE CONTI<OL PLANNING BOARD TO FURIltEI.I DEFINE TIllS COHC[PT. AS SOON AS I't~AT PROCESS IIAS BEEN COMPLETED, INFORMAl]ON WILL BE FORWARDEf~ TO YOUR ATTENTION. NOTE: More detailed information may be found in the REAUFtIORIZAIION OF TIlE LEAA PROGRAM bri~Fing document or by cal~iii-g-'i'i'E~C--~-~-aff ?ART III. PUBLIC DOCUMENT CONTAINING PROCEDURES ADOPTED BY THE RE§PON[dBI.E AU'I'HORITY TO AD,YIINiSTER THE MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT I, ., the Respons~b!e AuthorilW for the City of ., appointed under a resolution adopted by the city counci! on the day of .... , 19 ., hereby establish the follow- ing 'procedures for the administration of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act: appropriate designee isa charge of the particular files o~ systems containing the government data requested. Every attempt shall be made to comply with the requests in an appropriate and prompt 'manne~ as specified by these procedures and by the Minnesota Gove,nment Data Practices Act. Collection of Data A. Collection and storage of government data and data on individuals by employees and agents of the city shall be limited to that necessary for the administration and management of p~ograms speci'- ficall~ authorized by the federal government, legislature and this city. B. Private 'or confidential data on an indivi-' dual shall not be collected, stored, used or dis- seminated by th~s city for any purposes other than · those stated to the individual at the time of collec- tion in accordance with the following paragraph .C, except as provided' in Minnesota Statutes 15.163, Subd. 4. C. All individuals asked by any employee or agent of this city to ·supply private or confidential data concerning himself shall be informed of: (1) the purpose and intended use of the requested'data within the city; (2) whether he may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data; (3) any k~own consequence arising from hss supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and (4) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data- Requests for Government Data All requests fo~ gov. ernment data must be in w~iting and signed by the requesting person. When ~equesting private or confid~zntial-~ data, the recluest- mg person must identify himself by presenting a Minnesota driver's license or another identifica- t~o:~, card acceptable to the Respons,bte Authority ot nay designee which contains a photograph of the individual requesting the data. Requests for government data may be received by me or by the Typ~s The types of records, files, and processes relating to pri~a~e and conficlentia! data on individuals re- tained bY this city and the citation to federal law or statute authorizing this classification, are the following: .' A~' 'Personnel data (Minnesota Statutes 15.1692) · - personnel data means data on individuals c})llected because the individual is or was an employee of or an applicant for employment by this city. '" 1, Except fo~ employees described in para-- graph 5, the following personnel data, on current and fo~mer employees of this city is public: Name; . Actua! gross salary; Salary range;. Actual gross pension; The value and nature of employer-paid benefits; The bas'~s for and ~he amount of any added remuneration, including expense relm- bursement, isa addition to salary; Job title; Job description; Education and train:rig background; Pre~,ious work expe;ience; Dare of first and last employment; lhe status of any complaints or charges aga!nst the employee, whether or not the complain! or charge resulted in a dis- ciplmary act:on; The final dispos:,rion of any disciplinary act:on and supporting documentation. 2. I~xcept for appiicams described in para- graph 5, tiao following pc:so,reel data 6n current and forme.' applicants for em- ployment by th~s c;w istmbfic: -4- Names of applicants, when certified, if the ; city has a civil service system, or otherwise determined to be eligible for appointment to a vacancy; Veterans' status; Relevant test scores; ~ Rank on eligible list; Job history; Education and training; Work availability. 3. Personnel examinations and answer keys are confidential data, except pursuant ' to a valid court order. 4. All other personnel data, including but not limited to the following types, cate- gories, files, and processes, is private data on individuals: Data collected for disciplinary proceedings prior to the hearing; insurance status; Medical records when part of personnel data; Psychological evaluations;. Social security numbers; Physical limitations; Adult criminal history data; References; Employee home addresses and telephone numbers; Sick leave forms containing doctor's reports; Oral interviewer file prior to an applicant's oral exam; Exit interview responses; Racial and ethnic data; Marital status; Reference check data as it appears on the employment application; Opinion. questionnaire responses by poten- tial employees; College transcripts, except for name of institution, degree granted and date; Names of applicants for employment until .certified as eligible for appointment to a vacancy. by the city attorney acting in his professional ~;apacity for this city shall be governed by statutes, rules and professional standards con- cerning discovery, prodbctlon of documents, introduction of evidence, and professional responsibility. The provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act do not apply to city attorneys. This provision shall not be con- strued to affect the applicability of any statute, other than Minnesota Statutes, Sections 15.162 to 15.117, which specifically requires or pro-. hints disclosure of specific information by the city attorney, nor shall this provision be con- strued to relieve the Responsible Authority, other than the city attorney, from his duties and responsibilities pursuant to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. .. C. Law enforcement data (Minnesota Statutes · 15.1695) When collected, created or. maintained by the law enforcement agency of this city: . 1. Data on participants in crime prevention programs including lists of property with identification numbers or evaluations or recommendations related to structural secur- ity against unauthorized entry is pri~a~e-. 2. Data contained on incident complaint reports, variously called logs or dockets, comprising a chronological record of ev- ents, is public; hosvever, that data on indi- viduals which could reasonably be used to determine the identity of an undercover agent, informant, or victim of criminal sexual conduct is private data on individuals; provided further that any other data classf- fled by law as private or confidential con- tained in the incident complaint .reports shall remain private or conj~denHa! data. 3. Information concerning procedures which reflect deliberative processes or investiga- tive techniques of law enforcement agencies is conJ%lential. 5. All personnel data maintained by this city relating to an individual employed as or an applicant for employment as an under- cover las,/ enforcement officer is pri~,ate data on individuals. B. City at'torney (Minnesota Statutes 15.1694) Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 15.162 to 15.117, the use, collection, storage, and dissemination of data -5- 4. The prosecuting attorney of 'this city shall release investigative data collected by the city's law enforcement agency to the victim of a criminal act or his legal represen- tative upon written request unless the prose- curing attorney reasonably believes that the release of the data will interfere with the investigation, or that the request is p~omp~ed by a desire on the part of the requestor to engage in unlawful activities. D. InvestigatiVe data (Minne~,ota Statutes 15.162, Subd. 2a) Data collected by a civil or criminal inves- tigative agency ~ part of an active investigation uBdertaken for the purpose of the commence- ment of a legal action is con.fidential. E. Elected officials correspondence (Minnesota Statutes 15.1697) Correspondence between indiv, iduals and elected officials is private data on individuals, but may be made public by either the sender or the recipient. F. Medical data (Minnesota. Statutes 15.1698) 1. Access to medical data in. the possession of the city by the individual xvho iS the subject of the data is subject .to the pro- visions of Minnesota Statutes,' Section 144.335. 2. If a person is a patient in a hospital operated by the city pursuant to legal com- mitment, the following information is public: the name of the patient, date ad- mitted, general condition, and date re- leased. If a person is a patient in a hospital controlled by the city other than pursuant to commitment, the following information is public unless the patient requests other- wise, in which case it is private data on individuals: name of the patient, date admitted, general condition, and date re- leased. The name of the patient, date ad- mitted, general condition, and date re- leased, when pertaining to an emergency patient who is unable to communicate, shall not be released until a reasonable effort is made to notify the next of kin. Even when an individual has requested that his name, date admitted, general concti- tion, and date released, be private, a hos- pital controlled by this city may release this information to a law enforcement agency pursuant to a lawful investigation pertaining to that individual. G. Ambulance service reports (Minnesota Statutes 144,80 ) Ambulance servic~ ~eports prepared pur- suant to Minnesota Statutes 144.807 are ¢on- ]idemid as provided, in Subdivision 3 of that section. H. Other- (List any additional types of information your city has which have been classified by federal law, state statute or temporary classi- fication the Department of Administration.)' (Note to Responsible Authority: .All govern- ment data collected, created, received, main- tained 'or disseminated by your city is public' unless classified by statute, federal law, or tem- porary classification pursuant to Minnesota Sta- tute, Section 15.1642. Before any additional information may be listed above ~nd classified as private, confidential, or not public, you, as the Respons!ble Authority, must find a statute, or federal law, which classifies that data, or you must apply for a temporary classification to the Comissioner of Administration on forms provided by the Commissioner of Administration--a sample form is available from the League office. Neither the city council nor a Responsible Authority may classify any data~ Private, confidential, and non- public data may be classified on!y by statute, fed- eral or temporary classification through the appli- cation procedure.) (Note to Responsib]e Authority: All forms used to collect private and confidential data must be included as an Appendix to this document. These forms should be only the blank fo;ms, without any private or confidential data contained on them.) (Note to Responsible Authority: You, as the Respohsible Authority must update this document annually and make any changes necessary to main- taln the accuracy of the document. After each legis!atwe session, the League wil! inform each Responsible Aud~ority, through the city clerk, of any add:tions or changes made in the classifica- tion of information.) -6- Procedures to assure that all data on individuals is accurate, complete and current Within the time and budgetary limitations es- tablished by the city council, the Responsible Authority and his designees shall review all data on indMduals in the possession of the city to determine if to the best of their knowledge, it ,s accurate, complete, and current for the puc- poses for which it was collected. All subjects of public and private data, to the extent that this data is in active use within the city, shall be noti- fied when the Responsible. Authority has reason to believe that the data on these individuals is not accurate, complete, or current for the purposes for. which it was collected, it will be assumed that data collected from data subjec, ts is accurate, com- plete, and current for the purposes for which it was collected unless the data subject other~vise notifies the Responsible Authority. Security safeguards No employee or agent of the city may release any private or confidential data to any person less that employee .is the Responsible Autho:-ity or one of his designees, or another person~auth- orized by the Responsible Authority. Rights of data subjects The rights of individuals on whom the data is stored or to be stored by this city are ?.s set forth in this section. A. An individual asked to supply pri~ate or confidential data concerning himself has the right to be informed of: {1) the purpose and intended use of tile requested data within this city; (2) whether he may refuse or is legallx,' required to supp!y the requested data; (3) any known conse- quence arising from h[s supplying or refusing to supply private or confidential data; and {4) the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the data. B. Upon request to the Responsible Authority o~r a des,ghee, an indi¢iduaJ shall be info~med: 1) whethe: he is ihe subiect of stored data on individuals;'2) whether it.is classified as pubhc, private or confident:al. C. Upon h,s fuqher request, an inclMdual who is the subject of stored private data on in- dividuals shall be shown the data without any charge to h:m and, :f he des[res, shall be informed of the content and mean!ng of that data. After an ind!v;dual has been shown the private data and informed of its mezn'ng, the data need not be di~- closed to him for six months thereafter unless a dispute or act!on pursuant to this section is pend- ing or additional dat~, on the individual has been collected. D. The Respo.nsible Authority shall provide copies of data upon request by the individual subject of the data. The cost of providing copies shall be borne by the individual. E. The Responsib!e Authority shall comply immediate!y, if possible, with any request made pursuant to this sect;on o~' witl~[n five clays of the date of the request, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal ho!idays, if :mmediate compliance is not possible. If he cannot comply with the request w!thin that time, he shall so inform the individual, and may have an add!tional five days within which to comply with the ;equest, excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal bo';days. F. An indiv!duai may contest the accuracy or completeness of public or private data concerning himseif. To exercise this right, an individual shall notify in w:iting the Responsible Authority describing the na~u:e of the disagreement. The Respons!bie Autho:ity sha~l within 30 clays either: {a) correct ~he data found to be inaccurate or in- comp!ere and attem?: to notify past recipients of inaccurate o: incom~':-:~c data, including recipients named b~/ the indi~Cu~_!; or (b) notify the indivi- dual that he betTe,es ihe data to be co~rect. Data in dispute shai: be disclosed only if the indwidua!'s staten:ent of d~sagreement is included with the dis- closed data. MCA :gib 12/79 -7- W~ Page 4A--Sun Newspapers--Wed., March 5, 1980 I I I I I I O v ewpo n, ts, Where's interest in Cable TV? There was a meeting in Mound last week to discuss setting up a local cable· 'television service area. Mound city manager Leonard Kopp invited rep- resentatives from several lake area communities to come and discuss cable possibilities. Spring Park and St. Bonifacius were the only communities to have representatives at the meet~ lng, however (along with Mound). The cities of Minnetrista, On)no, I,ndependence and Shorewood also received invitations. ~ The result of the low a~tendance was that not much happened, That's a. shame. Cable TV is definitely on its way to the lake area, and all local communities should be thinking of ways in -which to respond.. Meetings sucli as the one last week are essential if the area is to examine all the possi- bilities. · Maybe somewhere along the line, there should be a meeting of all the lake area communities to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a lake area cable service, area. Who knows what might. come.out, of such a meeting? So far, the only local city committed to a service area is Minnetonka (it has joined with Hopkins, Edina, Eden Prairie and Richfield). -If there are more meetings ihough, we hope they are better attended than Mound's was last week. Kopp said he wasn't disappointed. But, he pointed out that "Mound has enough people so that it can build a system of its own, if the need be. But that doesn't seem like the sensible way to do it." NEW GAP IS GENERATING Much has been written - and spoken - about the "generation gap]" that missing link between kids and parents. A thing peculiar to the late '60s and all of the '70s, the "gap" is now changing because a new gap is generating - a gap that skips a whole generation and pits the young against the very old - a gap that is present in a very real sense in Florida and will become a major problem for the future throughout the United States. The age makeup of America is changing, and change brings new problems, new circumstances, new challenges, and demands new solu- tions. The population of the United States, in total, is getting older on the average. "Zero nonnlatian years ago, and being in the baby business, he hasn't seen or sensed any increase in the rate recently. This friend further stated that "zero population" growth for the nation, as a whole would result in a birth-rate of 16 per 1,000 over an eight year period. Today and seemingly tomorrow too, births are down, population is · growing, and the thing that's doing the latter is the increasing average age of "old folks". Births are down in spite of the fact that last year, "a million CtIILDREN 16 years and younger had a million babies." Two recent surveys summarized in the Wall Street Journal have documented the facts that American men and women 65 years old can America's elderly of today realize the squeeze they're in. Social Secur- ity payments are disappointing and inadequate, inllation is destro~ng the stability of. those with a fixed income, medical costs are fierce, housing is hard to find and worse to hang on to, and ali the time the elderly are living longer while the problems of living are getting greater. A new gap between first and sec- ond generations between grand- parents and grandchildren - is a serious one. In general, both the young and the old depend on govern- ment money to a greater or lesser degree, and the group that has the votes is the group that has favored status. This fact brings the old and On As than subu: have dis lavishly direct, think a week at the school sponsored Arts and At spire bursl selves. So 3-1 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 10, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-100 SUBJECT: Change in W.H.H.S. Joint Powers Agreement Attached is a copy of a letter from the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and a suggested change governing the attendance of representatives of the W.H.H.S. Board Members. It is recommended the Council approve the change. Leonard L. Kopp I I · wg;t he~t~pin human services planning board ~w:,t-~we, t / L-i' / 4i00 vernon avenue routh, r~. Ioui; path. minM,ola SS4ib Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp: I am writ ing regarding several different matters. First, I have enclosed an invoice for your 1980 contrib- ution. We appreciate your continued support of West Hennepin Human Services and there is again no increase as we have maintained the same level of contributions by municipal it les. Second, enclosed is a change recommended by our Board to the West Hennepin Human Services Joint Powers Agreement. We are asking your city council to approve this change, We are participating with the United Way, Hennepin County, and the City of Minneapolis in a group that is looking at the overall human service system and attempting to coord- inate efforts. We are trying to find out who fund's which services and would appreciate your 'completing the enclosed questionnaire. I will forward the compiled information to you when it is completed. We appreciate your attention to these matters. Please call me if you have any questions or need more information. Thank you. M_a~cy' S. hap~ir~o ~u/ Execut,ve D~rector MS :be &l/ hchna ?n human ervlc, plannlnf) .r-" REQUEST FOR JOINT POWERS CHANGE board rnlnnuota. Board members who are municipal appointees do not have any re- quirements for attendance because we do not have any method for removing them from the Board, Currently provider members may be removed for non-attendance at three consecutive monthly meet ings. In order for us to have a quorum (which is 50~; of the Board plus one) to do business, we need to have attendance by municipal appointees. We are therefore, asking for your approval of the following policy: POLl CY FOR REMOVAL OF WHHS MEMBERS After second consecutive missed meeting, WHHS will call the member (unless previous arrangements are made), and this call wi 11 be followed by a letter stating that their.position on the Board may be in jeopardy if they miss the next meeting. After third consecutive missed meeting, the member may be re- moved from the WHHS Board. This will be ratified at the re- comm¢:ndat ion of the Executive Committee, by WHHS Board at the meet ing fo1 lowing third consecutive missed meeting. Member municipality will be immediately informed by the WHHS Board if their representative is removed for non-attendance. We are also asking for your approval of the deletion of the word "complete" in the following section of the Joint Powers Agreement of West Hennepin Human Services Plan.ning Board: Article IV Secti.on...5 Any Council, however, shall have: r.e, mp-~et.e authoril:y to appoint and to remove at any time any director approved by such Council. 3-11-8o CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 10, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-10! SUBJECT: 1980 Street Construction Attached is a copy of a letter from the Engineer relative to those requests for street widths narrower than City standards. Hatch 5, are p~til.,i~)ni.n.~ i'of ~,~e '..ad ta the proposed l;~-enty-ei~ht (2A) feet. If I,r~m;non~i ~ere ~) be w~de~md to t~venty-eighh [23) feet several l~rge r.e!:iovet]) ~tllil ~t re[aitl[Ilg' wall w()ald, h,~vc ~o he torll dowil iii-l([ rebuilb. '[his fa,rd beiu~ a dead end street~ we ail h~tve off street parking a~d have no need i'or on street parking. Most of the houses are very close to rigi~t of wa.y and further wideni~ll w,),~ld cause many people ~o walk out titeir front door and step into the street. ?re would like to re{tuest the city not m~tke Drummond ~ioad an~ wider than it is now. :l'he undersigned petitio~mrs are the on[[y residents this roac[ services. (Delinquent Util'ity Bills) (Over Six Months Old) Account Number 11-025-1578-81 11-025-1591-11 11-027-1656-61 11-031'-1617-21 :1_ 1 - _n3~,- 1774-51 11-046-1752-51 11-052-5111-11 11-058-5043-01 11-067-1920-41 11-067-1959-21 11-070-1921-61 11-076-1772-01 11-082-1767-81 11-085-4960-91 11-088-5637-61 11- 094-2o68- 51 11-1o3-5984-9! 11-166-2257-Ol 11-169-554O-ol 11-169-6256-21 11-175-5444-21 11-187-5570-91 11-211-2136.-01 · -1--t--2-2-3,..J3-304 ~I. Amount 85.55 54.5o 47.57 35.20" '.~.. ~5 ~-~ ~' ~o 101.37 59.40 86.?o F=~ 4~ao ~/,,/~ 44.2~Z '. ( 11./r.., ' . 219.52 44.60 265.69 121,92 60.~7 51.44 1~8.07 35.20 76.68 100.11 78.24 71.94 65,85- j,£.. ~ / ?3 McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS !~ LAND ,SURVEYORS ~ ,SITI~ PLANNE. R,S Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 March 7, 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp .City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Subject: City of Mound 1980 Street Construction Dear Mr. Kopp: As requested, we submit the following recommendations on questions raised at the public hearing. Edgewater Drive We recommend that the width of Edgewater Drive be 24 feet back to back of curb. The right-of-way of this street is 30 feet. There are several garages very close to the right-of-way and a standard width street would make access to these garages difficult. At one location, the property slopes downward towards the lake from the street. The. property owner has constructed off street parking by building up an area adjacent to the road and installing retaining walls. If a standard street were constructed he would not be able to use this parking area. There is one house that is right on the right-of-way and construction of a 28 foot wide street there is impossible. Hanover Road - Roxbury to end east of Amhurst The City has received a petition asking that Hanover Road be narrower than the standard 28 feet back to back of curb. We would not recommend this. There ar~ no particular problems on this street such as many trees near the street or driveway access problems or steep banks that would necessitate a narrower street. We do not feel that the 28 foot wide standard street iS an excessively wide street. It is the minimum width required for parking on one side of the street. Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria- Granite Falls Northern Road - Edgewater Drive to Channel This street has a 20 foot right-of-way, there are three garages right on the right-of-way. We recommend construction of a 16 foot wide street without curb or gutter on this portion of Northern Road. On a 16 foot wide surface curb and gutter would make snow plowing difficult. Alley Off Lynwood Boulevard by School Football Field We recommend that the standard 28 foot wide street be constructed here. Willow Road Off Clover Circle This short dead end road provides access to Clover Circle to two houses. There can be no additional houses built on this street. It really is more of a driveway than a City street. We recommend construction of a 16 foot wide road with no curb and gutter on this street. Drummond Road - East of Amhurst The'City has received a petition asking that this street be deleted from the project. The attached map shows the ownership boundaries on this street. Ail of the properties with the exception of Lots 13, 14 and 15, which are City owned have access to another street. The decision on whether or not to delete this street from the project depends on the City's future plans for these lots. West E. dge Boulevard The question was raised as to why West Edge Boulevard is being upgraded since it is already a good blacktop street. I have talked with the Public Works Director who reports that this street is an extremely high maintenance street. The street has deteriorated to such a extent that they no longer patch holes but blade patch the street; that is truckloads of bituminous mix are hauled in and bladed onto the bad areas, the street also has numerous patches from past utility connections and there are three places where water stands in the street after a rain. The existing surfacing is less than 2 inches thick. We feel that West Edge Drive should be in the Street Improvement Program. Bartlett Boulevard Bartlett Boulevard between Shoreline and Wilshire has an average daily traffic count of between 3000 and 4000 vehicles per day. A small portion of the street between Fernside Land and Norwood Lane has concrete curb and gutter and is 44 feet wide. No construction is proposed on this section. The remainder of the street ~s approximately 26 feet wide. It wab requested at the Public Hearing that Bartlett be 28 feet wide. We would recommend that because of the high traffic count that the portion of Bartlett on the 1980 Street Improvements be 32 feet wide for saftety purposes. Another request at the Public Hearing was for a parking area and sidewalk by the ballfield near Wilshire. There would be no problem with constructing these. We look to the Council for direction on this. Manchester Road and Bradford Lane The attached plan shows the proposed construction of Manchester Road from Devon Lane Lo Leslie and Bradford Lane dead ending from Leslie. Most. of the properly owners on this stretch of Bradford Lane have objected to extending Bradford through to the intersection of Monmouth. None have asked that it be extended. The proposed construction on Bradford Lane would provide street access to all properties on the street. If you have any questions on any of these items, we will be pleased to discuss these with you at your convenier~e. Sincerely, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyle Swanson, P.E. LS: sj '! ;HIRE BLVD. ~AFTON RD.~ ; 4o 13 14 MANC 31 This,block is oll marsh I D'h~s block is Oil marsh I 1 TI~5 block is all marsh Sec 15 14 13 II I0 9 ~ ROXBURY- L~NE ............ -4- EXTER LANE r~J x~ESo;t /OF T~~ 612-296-9872 , , , .. February 26~ 1980 Charles Weaver, Chairman Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building 7th and Robert Streets .St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 In reply refer to: 608 Evaluation, Review and Coordination of Federal Assistance Programs and Projects Dear Mr. Weaver: C.., }-'or ','r?~..; h,.ar.q',~ . f',:: P:c p ',,0 rep;7 for Chrr;;? , ig In accordance with the A-95 agreement executed between this department and the Metropolitan Council, we are submitting for review the Project Development Report for the following proposed Federal Aid Bridge Replacement Project: S.P. 27-725-04, Minn. Proj. BR OS 9027( ) CSAH 1.25 over Spring Park Channel in Hennepin County Replacement of Bridge No. 90619 Hennepin County is responsible for development of this project. Please advise us if additional information is required. FGordon M. Fay Director, ~ffice of State Aid Enclosures: PDR V CC: File - 420 GMF: j mm John Petrich An Equal Opl, ortunity Employer PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REPORT for CSAH 125 in HENNEPIN COUNTY HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 7586 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION PROJECT PATH SELECTION The Hennepin County Department of Trans- portation (HC/DOT) has prepared and sub- mitted this Project. Develpment Report in accordance with the Minnesota Action Plan Guidelines. This project proposes to replace the existing State Bridge 90619 on'County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 125. The bridge crosses over Spring Park Channel, which connects Spring Park Bay and Black Lake. The project is between Spring Park and Mound. It includes the reconstruction of the roadway approaches. The project is about .11 mile long. Following the State of Minnesota Action Plan Guidelines, the HC/DOT proposes to develop this project along the minimal level path shown below - -Project Development Report - Winter 1979-80 -Public Notice Floodplain Encroachment - Winter 1979-80 -Location-Design Study Report - Spring 1980 -Plans, Specifications, and Estimate - Summer 1980 -Advertise for'Bids - Fal 1 1980 PROJECT MANAGER Chief, Design Division Hennepin County Bureau of Public Service 320 S Washington Ave Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 (612) 935-3381 LOCATION DESCRIPTION Parks PROPOSAL OBJECTIVES This project is in the western portion of Hennepin County near the Upper Lake of Lake Minnetonka. It is on CSAH 125, between CSAH 15 (Shoreline Blvd) in Spring Park and Tuxedo Blvd in Mound. The pro- posed bridge will cross over Spring Park Channel which connects Black Lake to. Spring Park Bay. (See map, p 3) CSAH 125 serves as a collector which. extends from CSAH 15 in Spring Park to CSAH 110 in Mound. In the project area, CSAH 125 is a north-south, undivided, 2-lane roadway. The proposed project will replace existing State Bridge 90619. The bridge has a roadway width of 25 ft and a deck width of 27 ft. It has no sidewalks. The approach roadways are about 32 ft wide. The right of way is 66 ft wide. The CSAH 125 roadway has an asphalt wearing surface. North and south of the bridge, CSAH 125 curves slightly westward. The bridge has steep approaches with 9% grades. The existing bridge is on the crest of a very short vertical curve which is about 50 ft long. The resulting sight distance is about 90 ft long. The existing CSAH 125 alignment has a 25 mph sight distance. The proposed bridge project is on 2 narrow strips of land that divide Black Lake and Spring Park Bay. The existing land use in the area is residential. No parks are within a half mile of the project area. This project will replace a bridge which has an estimated remaining life of I to 5 years. The existing bridge.has several substructure and deck items needing major repairs. Conarete is · deteriorated, spalled, and broken in some areas of the footings, the wingwalls and the abutments. The abutments and the bbttom of the deck slab have exposed reinforcement bars (rebars) where the concrete has spalled. The existing expansion joints need sealing. -4- r~ cl. ~,axwe'Ll-: Dr, ~_ ri Navar oun ~I~ C.P 300 l~4etro Square ]~uilding, 7th Street and I{obert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291-6359 March 4~ I789 To Whom It May Concern: RE: Hennepin ~ounty Project Development Reoort for CSAH 125 over Spring Park. Channel ~ Replacement of Bridge.q0619 Spring Park and Mound~ Minnesota Received 02/28/80 Metrooolitan Council Refer. ral File No, 8!06'L1 The Metropolitan Council has received an application for federal funds to accomplish the above referenced project. The federal procedures for review of these applications require that any potentially affected units of government, neighborhood organi- zations, groups, and human rights connnissions be notified of the project and given an opportunity to comment. The interest of your community groups should be expressed by means of a letter describing the effect the project might have on your community or the type of additionR1 information you would like to receive. Upon receipt of a notice of your interest, if any, it is incumbent upon the Metropolitan Council to arrange a conference with the applicant for the benefit of all interested parties. If you'desire to review the application, copies are on file at the Metropolitan Council and in the offices of the applicant. Sincerely, Referral Coordinator JR/ch. cc: Thomas Harren, Administrator, Federal-State Realtions Metropolitan Council District 16 ~ ~ ? At..,'e~:~U~ (~r~;at':M t~ (_;o~n'din;~t~~, the Planning ~nd Dt~v~.qol?n~p. nt of th~.~ T~vin (.*itit~.,~ ~Ietropolitan Ar~.~ ('.on,prising: (;o,~l,ty .: Cht~ w~'r (.?o,~ty ~; I);~l~ot~ CotH~ty ,9 t[ortnepin County ,?, tlr~n:fi_oy County ,~ Scott £;ounty ' t, Va~ghingtok~ County 3-11-8o CITY OF HOUND Mound, Minnesota March 6, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-91 SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearings The following Public Hearings were continued until March llth: 1. 1980 Streets 2. Water along Westedge Boulevard '-E~bnard L. Kopp ' ~' I cc: McCombs Knutson Associates 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 6, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-94 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Delinquent Utility Bills The Council set the date of March Il, 1980 for the public hearing on the attached list of delinquent utility bills. A revised list showing any payments will be at the Council meeting on March llth. ~Z~e~ard L'. 'Kop'p Account Number 11-016-1543-1i 11-025-1578-81 11-025-1591-11 11-027-1656-61 11-031'-1617-21 11-034-1774-51 11-046-1752-51 11-052-5111-11 11-055-5037-81 11-058-5043-01 11-067-1920-41 11-067-1959-21 11-070-1921-61 11-076-1772-01 11-082-1767-81 11-085-4960-91 -l'-r=oes-~998-Jt 1 11-088-5637-61 11-o94-2o68-51 11-1o3-5984-91 11-166-2257-Ol 11-169-554O-Ol 't 1--t69~3'1 11-169-6256-21 11-175-5444-21 11-187-5570-91 11-211-2136-01 (Delinquent Utility Bills) (Over Six Months Old) Z-15.-80 Amount $135.08 85.55 54.5o 47.57 .. 35.20 101.37 59.40 66.20 239.52 44.60 265.69 33.6o 121.92 60.37 51.44 138. o7 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 6, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-92 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendations Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes. Council action is required on: Subdivision of Land Part of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision 168 Zoned A-1 10,OOO Square Feet The Planning Commission recommended the existing parcel be divided into two parcels: Parcel A - The East 50 feet of the West 200 feet of Lot'47 - In excess of 15,000 square feet Parcel B - The East 50 feet of the West 150 feet and the East 50 feet of the West 100 feet lying South of the North 348 feet thereof - In excess of 20,000 square feet The Administration concurs. 2. Subdivision of Land - Tabled. Parking Variance - Rezoning Lots 38, 39, 40 & 41, Auditor's Subdivision 167 Lots 38 & 39 zoned Multiple Dwelling/Lots l!O & 41 zoned Commercial The Planning Commission recommended a parking variance under a con- tractual agreement. They also recommended the City look at releasing Lot 37 (which the City holds tax forfeit to that property) and then rezone Lots 39, 38 + 37 from Multiple Dw.elling to Commercial. Rezoning requires a public hearing and rezon[ng can be accomplished in one of two ways. 1. An application by the land owner posting a $75.00 fee. 2. Council initiative and no fee. If the Council has a hearing to rezone 38 & 39, should other lots be considered? If rezoning is considered, it is recommended the Planner be asked for a report. COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-92 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendations - Page 2 4. Street Vacation - Short Road The Planning Commission recommended vacation of the street. A Public Hearing is required. The date of April 8th is suggested. 5. No action. MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 25, 1980 Present were: Chairman Russell Peterson, Commissioners Gary Paulsen, Margaret Hanson, Harriett Dewey, Gera.ld Smith and George Stannard. Also present were Councilman Gordon Swenson, City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Inspector Henry Truelsen and Secretary Marjorie Stutsman. BOARD OF APPEALS 1. suE~'ivi~ion of Land Part of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision 168 M. L. Sycks was present. Smith moved and Dewey seconded a motion to accept the application as stated. The vote was unanimously in favor of approving the sub- division.. Subdivision of Land Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, The Highlands Duane Skochenski and Mr. & Mrs. Schmidt were present. Smith moved and Stannard seconded a motion to table business at hand for 30 providing information is available as to where the new. street will be and if not, table for another 30 days. The vote was unanimous- ly in favor of tabling. Note: Problem is garage setback deficiency--City Inspector to check with Engineer on location of road. Parking Variance Lots 38, 39, 40 & 41, Auditor's Subdivision 167 Henry & Marjorie Rines present. Discussed parking spaces available and required; also the zoning. Lots 38 & 39 zoned multiple and 40 & 41 commercial. Stannard moved and Smith seconded a motion to approve this proposed parking subject to contract parking provisions with the City and with the recommendation that additional parking be made available through reasonable long term provisions adjacent or across the street to provide at'least 8 more parking spaces and further recommend that Lots 38 and 39 be rezoned to commercial and further recommend looking at the feasibility of the land the City is hold adjacent to this be made available to applicant on a long term agreement or for sale and it be rezoned as needed. The vote was unanimously in favor. 4. Street vacation of Short 'Road Leo Palesotti was present. Smith moved and Stannard seconded a motion to recommend the vacation of Short Road. The vote was unanimously in favor. Planning Commission Minutes February 25, 1980 - Page 2 ,. BOARD OF APPEALS 5. Professional Building Concept - Commercial Use District Part of Lots 1, 2 & 3, Skarp's East Lawn PID # 13-117-24 44 0052 No one present on this item. No action taken. Smith moved and Dewey seconded a motion to adjourn. All in favor of adjournment, so adjourned. Attest: AGENDA MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING .February 25, 1980 BOARD OF APPEALS 1. M. L. Sycks, 5900 Beachwood Road Part of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision 168 - Map 9 Subdivision of Land Duane Skochenski/Schmidts' - 2997 Highland Boulevard Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, The Highlands - Map II Subdivision of Land Henry R. & Marjorie M. Rines - Property Address 2537-2539 Commerce Blvd. Lots 38, 39, 40 & 41, Auditor's Subdivision 167 - Map 9 Parking Variance Leo L. Palesotti, 6200 short Road Adjacent to South 1/2 of Lots I & 2, Block 7, Mound Terrace - Map 4 Street Vacation of Short Road 5. Professional Building Concept - Commercial Use District Part of Lots 1, 2 & 3, Skarp's East Lawn (PID# 13-117-24 44 0052) - Map 5 Date: F rom: To: February 20, 1980 Bldg. Inspector Planning Commission Subject: Board of Appeals - 2-25-80 1. M.L. Sycks Subdivision Part of Lot 47 Auditor's Subd 168 This property was originally in two parcels as stated and was combined for tax purpose benefit. Owner now would like to subdivide as originally was purchased. Each parcel is well in excess of required 10,000 square feet and new construction meets all setbacks in accordance with zoning. Can see no problem in allowing sub- division of this property. Duane Skochenski Subdivision Lots 1 & 2, Blk 3, The Highlands 85-61610/1290 PID 23-117-24 41 O014 ' Lots 1 & 2 meet the square footage requirement of the A-2 Residential Zoning. HOW- ever; the house on Lot 1 and also existing garage does not now meet the requirements of side yard setbacks. The house is 7.5 ft. from side yard, which is a deficiency of 2.5 ft. The existing garage, has doors opening to Idlewood Road and that has a setback deficiency of 12.8 ft. The survey does not propose to show the remainder of new garage on Lot 2 but at the time of original construction of garage he did set the garage back at 20 ft. from right-of-way, of Bryant Lane. We di~ have survey at that time to properly locate garage with existing setback requirements of 20. ft. The existing house on Lo~ 1 would meet the setbacks of new ordinance. However, the existing garage does not comply and I feel it should be moved to conform to setbacks now in existence, also for the benefit of new zoning ordinance. Marjorie & Henry Rines Parking variance 85-61250/7410 & 7810 Auditor's Subd 167 Lots 38-39-40 &.41 I do not feel this commercial venture should be allowed unless the probability of added parking area could be acquired through prossibility of the sale of City lands abutting this property on the north. Existing parking shown maybe adequate for this particular use as proposed; however, if this were to go into a professional use struc- ture or structure of another retail use, the City would suffer by insufficient park- ing area. It is true that the County does allow on street parking in this area at the present time but if an update of Commerce Blvd. should occur, the City may re- consider on the probability of posting "No Parking" on this right-of-way. 4. Leo Palesotti Street Vacation South 1/2 of Lots 1 & 2 Blk 7, Mound Terrace 14-117-24 32 0035 I don't believe that Short Road should be vacated as Lots 1 and part of Lot 2 will not have public access. When the right-of-way improvment goes through perhaps the City should consider closing Short Road and allowing property owner to use City right- of way for driveway purpose, with the understanding the City will not maintain that portion of the right-of-way. This brings up an interesting situation as to how to assess property owner for front footage of curb and gutter and/or improve Short Road to the center of Lot 1, provide access improvement and the City maintain .same. I shall attempt to have a letter from City Engineer for Planning Commission meeting as to his thoughts on this suggested proposal. ~ ~'V '-' AP ION FOR SUBDIVISION Sec. 22.03'- a VILLAGE OF MOUND AND FEE S_ 25,00 PLAT PARCEL Locationandcompletelegaldescriptionofpropertytobedivided: rt /Lot 47 Auditor's Subdivision 168 East 1'00 feet of the west 200 feet and the east 50 feet of the'west lying south of the north 348 feet of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision ZONING A-1 100 feet 168. To be divided as follows: Parcel A: Parcel The E. 50 feet of the West 200 feet of Lot 47 Aud, Sub, 168 The E, 50 feet of the West 150 feet and the E. 50 feet of the t~est 100 feet lying South of the North 348 feet thereof, Lot 47, Aud. Sub. 168 (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: :ason: t-[~-¢ ] Square feet TO Square feet APPLICANT ~ ~)~"~ ~ ~'~" '"f'¢//"~~''/%Z¢ (s~¢nature) ADDRESS 5~100 Beachwood Road TEL. NO. ~72-4833 DATE 2-13-80 Applicant's interest in the property: This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is riot the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE · :Z:~-- .'..5 ~ .. ~-~:~ .'.. ~- ~ LO~e~ ~~ . t/ I ~. ~ / / '-,. . ~ . ~ ~-. / ~ , ~ ~ :' . ~ ' . . ~ ~, / ... ~ / ~ l/ . / .. .~ ~ ~ I~ I ~. . ~ /'~ / · ~ .._ ...'- ~ '' ~ t z ~ I' . , / ~ . - -'e v . ,~ ',[ , .. .... :_.~_ . '~%'i-'~ I ~. : I I ' '~-~~ "I: 'l'I .. - -- .' ~,.: I ~., · ' ' '~:~' "~ ~ " .. '~i I?:l::~:~ .... ' I ~ ~'.~ l *~, ", ~! ' "~S.--.:,Z~. . . · . . , .~ : ~,~, m . _-~: ,,.. ~~ , . I~.. ~...,~.., .. l. ,,~_ . 2-19-80 CITY OF MOUND Hound, Minnesota February' 14, 1980 .COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-65 SUBJECT: Lot Division - Auditor's Subdivision 168 At the January 28th Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission discussed the redivision of Part of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision 16R. The applicant purchased two parcels separately (each a building site) and then combined them for tax purposes. The County was requested to redivide the property to its original '' . boundaries which are: Parcel A: The East 50 feet of the ~,lest 200 feet of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision 168 Pa.rcel B: The East 50 feet o'f the West 150 feet and the East 50 feet of the West 1OO feet lying South of the North 348 feet thereof, Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision 168 The applicant felt the lots could be put back to the original parcels, therefore no formal application was before the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission acted as follows: Discussed subdivision of Lot 47, Auditor's Subdivision 168. Pauisen made.a motion to recommend subdivision in principle, NO second. No action taken. The applicant has now made formal application for the division and is asking the Council to act on his application. APF I 'ATION FOR SUBDIVISION O~' LAND Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE OWNER PLAT PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: LOTS /.~D_ ~:.c~.< "3 T~/-/c-- ~/,~k~.~-J5 ZONING To be divided as follows: (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From · Square feet TO Square feet Reason: . ./f,/ - 2 · · - .--, (signature) ADDRE~ Applicant's interest i · ~ ~ 7~ ' ., ~ .-~. This application must be signed by ~11 the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the ~ase. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DATE FOR: ]ERTIFICATE OF SUR' DUAAIE SC061i CAI SK I kEG A L Thc o Denotes iron monument D Denotes offset stake x ooo.o Denotes existing elev..: { ooo.o } Denotes Proposed elev. , ~ Denotes sur[ace drainage Proposed garage floor elev.: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the above described land and of the location of all buildings, DEMA]R,S - GABRIEL if any, thereon, ap~l all visible.encroachments, if any, from or on said land. LAND SURVEYORS, INC. / ,]daY.of ZczL~ ~_~19.~ As surveyed this · Plymouth MN. 55441 [' . . Proposed lowest floor elev. = Proposed top of foundation elev. = BENOIt MARK: File No. Book - Pa¢ 63 - 7+ Scale WE HEP. EIB"( CERTIFY' THP-,T ·THIS I.$ i~ TRUE AND CORRECT REP~ESENT,NTIO.NI OF IN .SDD. YEY' OF THE [5OUI'.~Dg.~IE$ OF THE: L/~"ID ,!Hi, O'.rE DF. SCRIBED AND OF-TI.(E LOC~,TI01.1 OF ALL [St)tLDtNG$, IF A'~Y, 'l'~4EREO,'q, /X~D ALL VISIBLE ENr..RO,XC-H,kdENITS~ APPLICATION FI VA RIA 1N CE CITY OF MOUND .fi'cpo FEE $ ~ .... ZONING..~' .... PROPERTY ADDRESS NAME OF ~/ ~,(.? , ~-~ 7ff~o APPLICANT ~ Tele phone I FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address T~ N' 1. Attach a su showing locatie in relation to 14 ' ''. ,~h~'.~/.q~t~.i4dL, ig~s'- tC~i]'~'J~, ,'v,':~,' t..'.. ~. on property and4.~~s: ......... 2' Give o~vnership and dimensions of adjoining property, Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. ~. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. [~ propos~~~~ent FRONT ff~,' '~ , ' ">~ YARD YARD LOT SQ. FOOTA OTHER (describe) .~.. --~'~t~ . A building permit.must be applied for within one year from the date of the council resolution o~ variance granted becomes null and void. P LANNrlNG COM MXSSION RE COREM ENDA TION DATE COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO DATE .7 r. : I ~PPI,ICATION FOR S'I'I.~I!;ET VACATIObl CITY OF MOUND SIGNATURE OF APPLICANi' ~ ./ /,; - r .~ ,, -- Addres.,. ...... ~2~5- ~_~ .... ~ ~" &[~../ /~'~. c~ ~ ..... l ....................... ~--~¢ ................................. ~eside~Ls and owners of property abut:tin9 the s~.reet to[~t'acaCed- J:eco.mm,.,~dcd by ll~i] :i. tie:;: NSP ........ ; Minnega.~;co ...... ; Cont-.inenLal Tel. ..~,z~.,.).,,, .: ~(.ed by City: Pt~b] ic Works ........ ; l:'J r{, Chi. el ........... ; Fmginec:r . ...... ; Z4~,.7 ,' 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 6, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-93 SUBJECT: County Road IlO The Parking question was on last week's agenda, but Mr. Mueller asked that it be brought up at a later date. With regards to County Road llO, the County has indicated they would consider approving # 110 in 1981 from Mound's North City Limits to County Road # 125. Minnetrista is still hopeful of getting #110 underway in 1980. Seemingly, they have no objection to 4 lanes in Mound. It appears Mound can take one of three actions: 1. Approve or reject the plans as drawn. 2. Request 4 lanes from the North City Limits to County Road 125. 3. Do nothing. This will be listed for discussion on March llth. Leonard L. Kopp cc: Mike Mueller H. Klossner 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 7, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-99 S.UBJECT: Harvest Pantry Co-op The Board of Directors and members of the Harvest Pantry Co-op have requested to be put on the agenda for the March llth meeting. Attached is material relative to their request. Hr. Tim Lovaasen, ci%y of ~4ound 5341 Maywood Road Mound ~4innesota 55364 Mr. Lovaasen: Harvest Pantry Food Co-op is now in its location at 2373 Wilshire Blvd. and will open its doors to the community at the end of March. Our food co-op will be serving this community innumerous ways such as: providing a place for people to buy low-cost, nutritious food, offering ten- percent discount to all senior citizens, bringing in speakers on nutrition and food preparation, and providing a recycling center. The co-op is being financed, initially, by community fund raisers and sales of stock. Eventually, we will be self sustaining. We are planning a fm~draising dinner to be held Friday evening, April 18 in Our Lady of the Lake School cafeteria, serving at 6:30 p.m. We will be providing a delicious buffet style menu of appetizers, turkey-ham, rice, salad, vegetable, dessert and beverage. We invite you to participate in this community project. Come, meet your constituents in an informal, friendly atmosphere and join in the fun. All we want you to do is help take tickets or serve beverages. The attached flyer should answer any questions you have about odr organ- ization. The Board of Directors and members of the Harvest Pantry Co-op will be at the Council meeting ~rch 11 to present verbally our invitation and receive your acceptance. Sincerely, Harvest Pantry Co-op Janet Smith, President ¥ ~OD PRICES GETTING' YOU DOWN? Word has been out for several months that a group of people are working to organize a food co-op, the Harvest Pantry,.to serve this area. Many of you are asking questions that we would like to take this opportunity to answer. 1. What is a food co-op? A food co-op, like any other co-operative association, is organized by a group of people concerned with offering their community low cost, quality goods and/or serv!oes. Membership is open to anyone but membership is not required in order to take advantage of what a co-op has to offer. A typical food co-op sells flours, oils, honey, spices, teas, whole grains, cheeses, etc., which they buy in bulk. Buying in bulk not only keeps down cost but can also mean better quality than food that. has been packaged in cardboard containers for months. A food co-op gets you back to the grass roots of cooking - no prepackaged dinners, no noodles in sauce - just good, healthy eating, and no tin cans or cardboard packages to pollute our environment. You bring your own containers for packaging when you shop at a co-op. 2. Where will the Harvest Pantry be located? The Harvest Pantry will be located at 2373 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, ~in the back of the Farmers Insurance Building, next to the Mound Fire Station. We ~pect to epen in March. 3. What foods will be stocked? - Cheeses, yogurt, dry milk - Flours, whole grains (i.e., - Nuts, seeds - Spices, teas - Oils, vinegar, soy sauce - Butter, peanut butter - Sweeteners (i.e., molasses, honey, sugars) - Dried fruits, dried beans, peas, etc. - Pasta (i.e., macaroni, spaghetti) rolled oats, brown rice) NOTE: Initially we will not be stocking perishable items but as we become established, we hope to expand into seasonal fresh fruits and vegetables, eggs and ~milk. Co-op members will receive a 15% discount. All senior cit- izens, regardless of membership, will receive a 10% discount. We will occassionally be featuring, educational speakers speaking on topics of nutrition, food preparation, etc. We will have available at the store, recipes and ideas for using the various foods we sell. Also, save your aluminum cans. for aluminum. We will have a recycling barrel 4. Who qualifies for membership? Ownership of common stock is required for membership and voting privileges and is limited to one share per member. The balance of your stock purchases will be in non-voting common stock, thereby limiting each member to one vote. Each member is required to work a minimum of 36 hours per year. Hours can be accummulated not only cashiering, but also cleaning, bookkeeping, etc. 5. What form of stock is being offered? Harvest Pantry stock is $5 per share. Common stoCk is an investment and a membership responsibility and privilege. Non-voting common stock is an investment. It does not carry any voting privilege. It can be converted to common stock should the holder wish to do so and become eligible for membership. Once the co-op is open and has adequate operating funds, non-voting stock will be retired, oldest first. 6. Why buy stock in this food co-op? Initial funding of the Harvest Pantry until it becomes a self-supporting business, cannot be done by bake sales and newspaper drives alone. We need your support now in order to enable us to serve this community in the f~ture. But you don't necessarily need to buy stock in order to help out. Many of the items we still need may be something you have lying around the house unused. We would very much appreciate do- nations of any of the following items: - Clear plastic bags to line 5- and 20-gallon food containers ~-~red bags have been chemically treated) - 5-gallon plastic pails with lids - 1-gallon or ½-gallon glass jars with lids - Scoops (can be made from ½-gallon juice containers with handles) - Sturdy tables or doors to be used as tables - Plexiglass for cutting foods - Adding machine or calculator - Cash ~gister or ~ckle box to be used for cash - Wood for shelving, shelving paper - Desk, sturdy benches - Cork board or a bulletin,board - Large stainless steel spoons - Lead-free paint - Refrigerator ~- Paneling - Sturdy children's ~able and chairs and sturdy toy box for children's corner - Industrial size brooms, mops, dust pans, etc. - Sponges, cleaning £1uids - Clerical supplies, pencils, pads, ~cipe cards, etc. - Economical ideas for alternatives to any of the above If you have items or ideas to donate, contact Katie Howard 472-1802. If you would like more information or would like to purchase stock con- tact Janet Smith 472-5031 or Mary Perbi× l~72-3299. 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 7, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-98 SUBJECT: Water Rates Attached is a copy of the rerun of the proposed rate schedules using 6,000 gallon, 7,000 gallon, 8,000 gallon and 10,000 gallon minimums. George Boyer will be at the March llth meeting to discuss these with the Council. nard L. Kopp cc: Eugene Hodge 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 (612) 473-4224 February 25, 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Water Rate Study Dear Leonard: Pursuant to your request, we have completed our analysis of the three additional water rate schedules suggested by the City Council. The results are shown'on the attached summary sheet. The various rate schedules studied were as follows: ALTERNATE NO. 1 ~First 10,000 gallons Next 20,000 gallons Next 20,000 gallons Excess $8.00 min. 0.60/1000 gallons 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. iA First 6,000 gallons Next 24,000 gallons Next 20,000 gallons Excess $6.00 min. 0.60/1000 gallons 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. lB First Next Next Excess 7,000 gallons 23,000 gallons 20,000 gallons $6.00 min. 0.60/1000 gallons 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. lC First Next Next Excess 8,000 gallons 22,000 gallons 20,000 gallons $6.00 min. 0.60/1000 gallons 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 1D First Next Next Excess 10,000 gallons 20,000 gallons 20,000 gallons $6.00 min. 0.60/1000 gallons 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 2 First Next Excess 10,000 gallons 40,000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 2A First Next Excess 6,000 gallons 44,000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 2B First 7,000 gallons Next 43,000 gallons Excess ALTERNATE NO. 2C First Next .Ecess 8,000 gallons 42,000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 2D First Next Excess 10,000 gallons 40,000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 3 First 10,000 gallons Next 20,000 gallons Next 20,000 gallons Excess ALTERNATE NO. 3A First Next Next. Excess 6,000 gallons 24,000 gallons 20,000 gallons $8.00 min. 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons $6.00 min. 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons $6.00 min. 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons $6.00 min. 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons $6.00 min. 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons $7.'00 min. .55/1000 gallons ..45/1000 gallons .40/1000 gallons '$6.00 min. 0.55/1000 gallons 0.45/1000 gallons 0.40/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO..3B First 7,000 gallons Next 23,000 gallons Next 20,000 gallons Excess $6.00 min. .55/1000 gallons .45/1000 gallons .40/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 3C First 8,000 gallons Next 22,000 gallons Next 20,000 gallons Excess $6~00 min. .55/1000 gallons .45/1000 gallons .40/1000 gallons ALTERNATE NO. 3D First Next Next Excess 10,000 gallons 20,000 gallons 20,000 gallons $6.00 min. .55/1000 gallons .45/1000 gallons .40/1000 gallons The results, as indicated on the attached summary, are self explanatory. All of the alternative rate schedules generate reve- nue in excess of the estimated cost of service ($310,000). If you have any questions and or comments, please contact me at your~ convenience. S~'~cerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES George W. Boyer, P.E. Vice President GWB:lf O09~O~E 8~0'6££ ELS'SSE 009'I9E 500'ILE DI I Sd~I~S~ ~0 AHVNND. S ! 3-I 1-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota Harch 7, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-97 SUBJECT: Cigarette License Renewals Cigarette Licenses expired February 29, 1980. The following renewal has been received. Saga Corporation (Tonka Toys) 4 Machines ~l:~.ohard L. Kopp 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 6, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-95 SUBJECT: Bingo Permit Request The Mound Fire Department Auxiliary has requested a Bingo Permit for April 1, 1980 to play Bingo at the Fire Station. They have requested the fee and bond be waived. '-qZ~onard L. Kopp -- 3-11-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 6, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-96 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 6, B]ock 7, Woodland Point This subject lot is tax forfeit and is a wet area. It is recommended that the City take this lot for wetlands. ~d L. Kopp 3-11-8o CITY OF HOUND Mound, Minnesota March 7, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-22 SUBJECT: 1980 Street Project Attached is a copy of a letter from the owner of 5467 Three Points Boulevard discussing their proposed street improvement assessment. Their lot has 72,000 square feet and 200 front feet on Three Points Boulevard.' 't<eohard L. Kopp / ~ ~ LLbl se. Il 7 ~t ! , toe /otc ]4~t4 sa.. - tooo ~.-F+. - # q]~ooo p~,.,,,.~n~,~,~, p-it.*. op4-;o,-, I - s4~,7 ". * ~, 'loo o~.. zS~- [,~.,o,., 4-4 · Tz~'~, added -t-143 y t. v o ~ tol 7'6 ~,- ,..l,e,..,. s e.,3 o. 27. 6' e.o · ~P--oe.,.,,.,d o~ Ao~ ~ e . , t~t /~ope ~o i x__0 · %... .~, ~. ~.2~ ~- _ L.AN ~. "'0 ATT-~IDA~C2 WELCOME C~}~4ENTS ~41NUTES APPROVED Fi?IANCIAL REPORTS ADOPTED Znoe~enden: School District ;lo. 277 WESTC~IKA PUBLZC SCHOOLS 5600 Lynwood Boulevard Hound, Hinnesota 55364 SCMOOL BOARD ~I~(UTES REGULAR MEETING ).IO~)DAY, FEBRUA~'! 11, 1930 (To be approved 3-10-80) The meeting was called to order at 8:02 p.m. in the lec:ure hall of the Mound Suilding with all school boaro members presen:: Fred )ama, Patricia Chelberg, Robert Howells, Gary ~.!ayer, Phyllis O'Malley, James Robin, Peggy Turtle, and Superintenden: Dale Fisher. Also in attendance were representatives of district personnel, students, community, and press. Chairman Mayer welcomed the large audience, gave instructions for addressing the board at various points throughout the meeting, and announced rearrangement of agenda item order. Kathy Davis, representing the Westonka Council for the Gifted and Talented, requested a study session to discuss a uniform, basic educational program. Parent Koran Charon expressed concerns about her child crossing the street safely at the bus stop, and was assured it was the bus driver's responsibility to signal the child across the street when passage was safe. Ron Roelofs and Jim Paradise said they had formed a new tax free corporation for the purpose, of building a sports center with private funds, and wanted to discuss land acquisition with the board. The chairman requested they meet with central administra- tors, who would develop a recommendation. Craig Clark, resident and parent, reacted to the newspaper article and agenda item about proposed position and program reductions. At 8:20 p.m. Clerk O'Ma!ley. moved that the school board approve as presented the minutes of the regular school board meeting of January 14, 1980. Howells seconded the motion which was approved unanimously by roll call vote, all members present. Bame seconded the motion by O'Malley that the school board approve as presented the current financial documents and Treasurer's Report indicatin~ present balances, including bills paid after the last board meeting; and that the school board approve payment of current' bills and claims and routine transfer of funds for budgetmaintenance~ Central administrators and treasurer Elaine Morrow resbonded to board member questions, after which the motion was adopted unani- mously by roll call vote of all seven members. School Board ~.linu:es SRADUATION TEACHER OF THE YEAR 1979-80 OPEPJ~T!~;G BUBGET REVISED SOLVENCY ESSAY REDUCTION IN PROGRJ~4S AND POSITIONS Chelberg seconded the mo:ion by O'~a!iey :ha: :he scn:cl board approve mid-year graduation for the foilowing senior class members: JAMES PATRICK BUTLER GALEA D'LAY~IE HEGG )IA~Y KAY HOGUE MARY CHRISTINE LANNS CYNTHIA MARIE O'HARE ARLENE MARIE PARTE?I PAMELA SUE PEDERSEN DAWN RENITTA POLSTON JONI MAY S~ANSON Roll call vote: Aye - Bame, Chelberg, Howells, Mayer, O'~alley, Robin, and Turtle; Nay - None; Absen; - None. Motion adopted unanimously. Senior High Principal Gaylen Thostenson intro- duced the ~chool board members to the graduates, who received their diplomas from the-chairman and were applauded by family and friends. Jeanette Brustad, Mound Elementary School teacher, was introduced as the 1980 Westonka Teacher of the Year, and will now enter compe- tion for the title of Minnesota Teacher of the Year. O'Malley moved, Bame seconded the motion, that the school board approve new operating budget figures for 1979-80 resulting from the conversion to an accrual system of calculation, as follows: EXPE?IDITURE BUDGET $7,61g,700 REVENUE BUDGET 7,373,300 AND that the following additional transfers, also primarily neces- sitated by accrual calculations, are also approved: FRO~ ' T__O AMOUNT General Fund Student Activities SIO,O00 General Fund Special Services 40,000 Roll call vote at 8:36 p.m.: Aye - Bame, Chelberg, Howells, Mayer, O'Malley, Robin, and Tutt!e; Nay - None; Absent - None. Motion unanimously approved. Superintendent Fisher presented his thoughts and recommen'dations to maintain district solvency for the future. Turtle seconded the motion by O'Malley that the school board direct the superintendent and administration to consider the reduction of programs and positions for the 1980-81 school year because of declining enrollment and financial capability of the school district, and to make.recommendations for the discontinu- ance and curtailment of programs and positions as seem necessary. William Goblirsch, representing the Task Force on Priorities, reported their committee felt central administration should explore ways of legally raising money and charging fees to prevent any reduction in the staff/student ratios. CONT' D ) School 3oard Hinutes 3 - ~. ii. 1~23 3oard memOers de,aced the resolution ac length unsil C~e!~er? called for the question at 9:0~ p.m. Roi! call vote ~nani~ousl? defeated the motion, with ail seven members presen: and ~locin~ nay. Mayer moved, Turtle seconded the motion, that the following resolution be adopted: {1) WHE.~EAS, Independent School District 277 is experiencing a decreasing student enrollment and projections indica=e a continuing decrease; and {2) WHEREAS, it becomes apparent we must reduce all expenditures and staff within the school district to coincide with the student reductions; and, {3) WHEREAS, the school board desires to maintain program quality; (4) BE IT RESOLVED that the school board authorize central adminis- tration to place only as many teachers as absolutely necessary on unrequested leave of absence. {5} THEREFORE, it is the intent of this board not to increase class size or compromise existing basic educational progrm~,s. (6) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the school board will institute a strict policy of "essentials only" purchasing by ali deParc~ents, and direct all administrators and supervisors to initiate s:rict control over all expenditures. In addition, the school boar~ will set aside ten minutes during each board meeting to examine purchases made by the school district. (7) BE IT FURTHER RESOLV~ that the school board encourage all employees to continue their efforts to conserve supplies and materials, and reduce costs whenever and wherever possible. O'Malley moved to amend the motion to delete paragraph four and amend paragraph five by deleting "increase class size or." The amendment failed for lack of a second. Discussion continued until Howells moved to table the resolution. Due to lack of a second the tabling motion failed. Robin moved to amend the resolution to retain paragraphs one throug~ three, followed by "Therefore be it resolved that the superintendent is directed to work with the assistant superintendents to develop broad budget recommendations for alternative budget cuts based upon certifying staff cuts of $150,000 annually and SI75,000 annually, both for 1980-81; and be it further resolved it is the intent of this board not to compromise existing basic educational urograms;" and add paragraphs six and seven. O'Malley seconded the amendment. Debate ended when 8ame called for the ques'.ion at ~:43 p.m. Roll call vote: Aye - Bame, Howells, O'Malley, and Robin; :(ay - Cheiber? :.layer, and Turtle; Absent - None. Amendment approved. By the sa~e roll call vote, the motion as amended was adopted. :.leering recesse: until 10:05 p.m. REDUCTi~N PRCGRAMS (CO:IT'D) GRADE LEVEL CHANGES School BoarO ~.!inutes - 4 - Feb. !i, 1980 ~y a series of roi1 call votes, the school boar~ voted to recon- sider :he amendm, en; and amended resolution'(wnich were approve~ prior :o the recess), and defeated the amended motion and amendment, leaving the resolution by Mayer and Turtle as originally presented on the floor for discussion. O'Malley moved that the resolution be amended to read the same for the first three paragraphs, revise paragraph four to state "BE IT RESOLVED that the school board authori:e central adminis- tration to consider the following: How they will effect and implement SI75,000 in certified personnel cuts, $45,000 in general expense and central administration cuts, if they can effect a $20,000 cut by moving grades one and two frcm the Round building in 1981-82, and the $55,000 administration cuts discussed before, totaling $275,000," followed by paragraphs five, six, and seven as presented. Robin seconded the amendment for purposes of discussion. Questions were raised by members before the roll call vote: Aye - Mayer, O'Malley, and Turtle; Nay - Bame, Chelberg, Howells, and Robin. Amendment defeated at 11 p.m. Administrators responded to board members' additional inquiries. Roll call vote: Aye - Bame, Chelberg, Howells, Mayer, O'Mal!ey, and Turtle; Uay - Robin; Absent - None. Resolution as presented in the original seven paragraphs was adopted. The meeting recessed until 11:20 p.m. Round Federation of Teachers President Donna Smith commented regarding the agenda item reporting moving of the sixth and ninth grades during 1981-82, listing concerns about concepts of the grade level organization and requesting consideration of a referendum to maintain the current program quality. A resolution was proposed by Tuttle and seconded by O'Malley. During lengthy discussion amendments were made, seconded, and approved, by a majority of the board members responding aye to the roll call votes, resulting in the following amended mo:ion: WHEREAS, the school board of Independent School District No. 277 passed a resolution April 18, 1977, and November 11, 1977, Stating that when the enrollment of nine through twelve grades - falls between 1050 - 1125, the ninth grade would be moved to Mound Westonka Senior High $ch-ol, and WHERF. AS, the November 2, 1979, projected 9-12 enrollment will be 1099 during the 1981-82 school year, BE IT RESOLVED that during the 1981-82 school year: Grades 9 - 12 will be housed in Mound Westonka High School; Grades 6 - 8 will be housed in Grandview School; Grades 1 - 5 will be housed in Hilltop, Shirley Hills, and Mound Elementary buildings; and Kindergarten will be housed where possible as a unit; SRXDE LEVEL C~A~iGES .... (CB~iT'D} GIFTED PRCGPJ,~IS PERSONNEL ACTION AIDE/EOE UNIT 3ETEP~INATiON PRINCIPALS' JOB DESCRIP. CDCURRICULAR STZPEHDS/ATH. POLICY School Board Minutes - 5- Feb. I!, !980 A?iD BE IT FURTHER RESGLYED that those involved in plannlng'F~r re- organization of Grades 6 - 8 take this opportunity to develop and impl~nent a middle school philosophy, good program ~esign, ~nd curriculum to meet the unique needs of the pre- and early adolescent. Educational matters based upon student neees to be considered are: !. Basic skills and general education instruction. 2. Exploration, experimentation, and enrichment Opportu ni ti es. 3. Program elements designed to enhance self- concept and socialization needs of stucents. Roll call vote on amended resolution: Aye - Bame, Chelberg, Mayer, O'Malley, and Turtle; :~ay - ;(one; Absent - :~one. Motion adopted at 11:49 p.m. A summary of programs f~r the gifted was presented for informa- tion only. Howells seconded the motion by O'Malley that the school board approve the personnel transactions presented by the superintendent on this date.* Details were requested from Community Services Advisory Council Chairman Craig Clark regarding the interview/ selection process for the Community Services Supervisor position. Tuttle moved that the transactions be amended to s:rike "director" from' the title of Donald Ulrick. Mayer seconded the amendment for purposes of discussion. The superintendent provided background for board members' questions.until Howells called for the question at 12:04 a.m. Roll call vote: Aye - Turtle; Nay - Bame, Howells, Mayer, O'Malley, and Robin; Abstain -Chelberg; Absent - None. Amendment defeated. After brief discussion of the motion as presented, the transactions were unanimously approved by roll call vote. Bame seconded the motion by O'Malley that the school board authorize district legal counsel to petition the Bureau of Mediation for a unit determination to resolve the definition and status of aides who work longer than the School year or as long as a ten-month member of the Educational Office Employees union. Roll call vote: Aye - Bame, Chelberg, Mayer, O'Malley, Robin, and Tuttle; Nay - None; Abstain - Howells; Absent - NOne. Discussion of the principals' job description was deferred to the February 25 meet and confer session. The chairman reminded members to return the questionnaire regarding cocurricular stipends and athletic policy which have to be drafted by the May board meeting. I~80-cll $C;qOCL School 3oard ~iinutes - 6 - Feb. !i, O'Hailey moved fha: the. school board adopt alternasi'ye !980-31 school calendar numbers ~ and $ (as prooosed by the assis:ans superintenden¢ for instruction and personnel). 3ame seconded the motion for purposes of discussion. After brief review, the resolu=ion was defeated with all members present responding nay to the roll call vote except O'Malley. Nembers commented en the ¥o-Tech District 287 six year plan submitted to the Minnesota State Board of Education which includes construction of a west campus in 1986-87. O'~alley reminded the assembly that February 26 was precinct caucus day. 5y unanimous consent the meeting adjourned at 12:3I a.m. Phyllis E. O'Malley School Board Clerk Gary K. Mayer School Board Chairman Complete documentation will be ~ncluded in the permanent minute books. /EM American. Legion Post 3.98 GAMBLING REPORT CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE ~ 2343.00 ~ROSS: ¢2}4~.00 ,, EXPENSES: SALES SAX ~91.00 SUPPLIES '~58 . 02 GAMBLING BOND 32.00 PAYOUT AS PRIZES: ; ¢a8] .o';:, 1250. OO 1250.00 PROFIT: , ,,~611.98 ~611.98 DISTRIBUTION OF PROFITS: COMMUNITY FLAGS ¢156.OO ALANO 25.O0 AMFR. HEART ASSN. 100.OO ...... ~2~'nn March 2, 1980 Mound City Council 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Council Members, We would like to express our concerns about the proposed street improvements on Island Park. While we recognize the need for paved roads on the hills, we question the necessity of an overall 28 foot width in our neighborhood. The traffic flow on Warner Lane only in- cludes those who live in the neighborhood. In addition the proposed 32 foot width of Tuxedo would seem to provide adequate access. We are concerned that a standard 28 foot width would not account for trees and would require excessive grading into the hillside. We do not believe that the additional on-road parking space pro- vided is worth the reduction in the appearance of the accompanying neighborhood. We do not enjoy the appearance of the high stone walls utilized in other road improvements in Mound. From the meeting with the City Engineer, we realize that the road design has not yet begun and request that our opinion be included in the design decisions. We definitely want to review the design prints before construction begins. In 1978, we were living on Shannon Lane and experienced-some of the particular problems with that improvement. We are concerned about project management to control construction schedules and road access during construction. The contract should include provisions that require Paving within one or two days after the road is graded. In addition, any driveway grading adjustments should be made as soon as possible. Penalties for exceeding the completion date should be as stiff as possible. We would also like to express our dismay at the information pol- icies of the city. When we moved in December, we were advised that no street improvements were proposed or planned for the future. We now learn that there was a 5 year plan at that time. More accurate information at that time would have facilitated the financial adjust- ments necessary for our involvement in this project. We Suggest that you provide any long range plan information to any prospective home buyers that may inquire. -2- We are very interested in seeing this project flow smoothly and result in improvements in our neighborhood and ask for your representation in this concern. We look forward to your consideration and .reply. Sincerely, Greg Krause Kathy Brown-Krause 3312 Warner Lane Mound, MN 55364 z U a '~ u ~ 300 301 -499 499 50O 502 511 51o 546 559 560 566 5o? 568 571 5?? 5-/8 58O 598 0C02 C11¥ EF MCUND MUalCI. PAL L.[~LJOR i.:UN5 I NCOMt S'IATEMENI JAKuAJ~¥ 30, 1980 I ~4ONTH AHOUNI RAT ~d' ' YEAR-]G-DATE · A M C.U IsT RA £ IG SALES ~;iNE iJ i-ER OTHER 18,131 40.67 $ -la,lB1 ..... 40.67 '1,254 16.21 ? ,25~- 16.2'/ 865 1,81 ~05 1.81 CUSTS Ol: SALES GP, t]SS PRoF 34,326 77.00 10 ~253 23.00 34,326 77.00 lO, z'53 ..... 2~ XP Ea S ES SALARI ES SELLIt~G 2,892 TRAVEL EXPENSES 9 -f ELEPkGNE 6'1 P~STAGE 9 ELEC'IRICI~ 220 .49 ~UEL 107 UTILITIES 42 .09 JANIIORIAL 12] .28 EMPLOYEE FKINGE bENEFITS 821 LEGAL 667 ....... ~S92 6 9 .02 350 ..... 600 1.35~ 675 1.51 158 .35 99 ' '6-i' ........... -'i5 130 .29 9 .02 z2o'i ......... .'4~ 107 z, 2 .09 123 821 1.8~ TUTAL kXPENSES $ 7,969 17.88 .$ 7,969 17.88 OPERAI'ING INCOME 0~, ILl]SS}. $ 2'284 .... 5'12 'i 2,284 5.12 LAST YEAR CURRENT PERIOD ...... YEAR..TG---DATE AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RA'IIO 16,821 44.28 $ 16,821 44.28 6,812 17.93 6,812 13,756 36.~t ........... 13,756_ ._ 36021 597 1 .~7 597 $ 37,9B6 1oo,00 ............... $ ...... 37,.9S6 .... 100.oo $ 29,249 7'7.00 $ 29,249 7;'. O0 $ 8t737 23.00 $ 8,737 23.00 1,373 6.33 2,403 6.33 350 . 92 350 . 92 600 1 °58 600 I. 58 14 I30 °34 °34 100 .26 .26 I40 .37 100 711 1.87 711 1.87 350 .92 350 6,17I 16.25 $ 6,171 16.25 2,566 6.75 $ 2,566 6.75 0 698 CURRENT P~_I~I aL) YL~AR-T O-DAT E. ANDbNT R~TTI3 AMCUNT RATI[~ GREEN - I ACCOUNTING t~O°8 690~ ~ S' ~0 °.9. .690 aE ~; 9~ 104. 120 139 14.0 158 159 164 165 169 170 199 '~ CUR~EN l ASSEIS CASH LiN HAND CASH IN gANK LeAN TO 6EN~RAL FU~D INVENTORY PR~PgI~ fiXP[NS[S NUNICIPAL LIqUgR FUNG BALANCE SKEET JANUARY 30, 1980 ASSEIS TCTAL CURRE[~T AS`SETS ASSETS ACCbMULATtB $ 41,011 LEASEHOLD iMPROVEMENTS ACCUMULATED AMOR'~ I ZAT t ~JN $ ~,901 ( 4~200) NET FIXED ASSETS ~lHER ASSETS iOTAL ASSETS $ 1,125 lZO,?09 1Z,200' 3,880 74,275 8,?~2 2,701 225,951 10,245 $ 2B6,196 GREEN -T ACCCUNTING 20'3 203 239 219 2~30 282 298 2.99 ~! Ct~RRENT L.iAb iLI-E lES ACCOU'NIS PAYAIJLE IRADE SALES 'fAX PAYabLE ACCRUED EXPENSES CASH OVER U~ SH~RT LIABILITIES AND Eqbll¥ 'IOI'AL CbKKENI LIABILITIES l'O-fAk LIA~ILilIES EQUITY FUND bALANCE 'TRANSFE£,~S CUI NET INC~3HE SUSPENSE IOIAL Eqbl-fY TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQbI'I¥ 20~606 130 181,080 2,323 105,437 22,193 22,193' 214,003 236,196 S6r/ 1980 BUDGET REPORT January 1980 DEPARTNENT BUDGETED CURRENT EXP. Y-T-D EXP. ~0833% % ALLOWED ACTUAL 02011 COUNCIL ~ 19,065.O0 556.00 556.00 1,588.11 '0290 03012 HUHAN RIG}ITS 450.00 .00 .OO 37.49 '.0000"- 04013 MANAGER 90.208.00 5,773.50 5,773.50 7,514.33 . .O640 06014 ELECTION~ 6,490.00 31.00 ..31.O0 540.62 .0050 07015 ASSESSING 34,050.00 21.00 21.OO 2,836~37 .O010 09016 FINANCE 106,796.00 6,114.98 6,114.98 8,896.11 .0570 11018 LEGAL 14,500.O0 1,166.67 1,166.67 1,207.85 .0800 !i118 PROSECUTING. 11,275.OO .OO .00 939.21' .0000 14031 POLICE 522,699.00 36,895.07 36,895.07 43,540.83 .0710 17032 FIRE 115,920.O0 717.30 717.30 9,6~6.14 .0060 19033 INSPECTIONS 31,944.O0 2,197.15 2,197.15 2,660.94 .0680 19933 PLANNING 13,655.00. . 2,052.93., . . 2,052.93 ..... 1,137.46... . ,15~0 '~1 21034 CIVIL...DEFENSE , 9,045.00 35.40' 35.40 753.45 .0040 " 28042 STREET 253,585.00 13,381.31 13,381.31 21,123.63 0540 297163 SHOP & STORE 37,295.00 1,656.O8 1,656.08 3,106.67 0440-~ · 35847 DISEASED TREES 49,O15.OO 140.O0 140.00 4,082.95 0030 ~ 3406~ PARKS .... . ...... 74,725.00. ..... 3.,450.40 3,450.40... 6,224.59 .0460 '! 00082 TEMPORARY LABOR 4,000.00 .00 .00 333.20 .O000 65091 LIQUOR 180,938.00 10,429.53 10,429.53 15,O72.14 .0570 60078 SEWER 390,325.00 23,296.38 23,296.38 32,514.07 .0600 60173 WATER 250,667.00 11,870.29 11,870.29 20,880.56 .0470 28 IMP.. :EQUIP OUTLAY 1Oo,6~O.OO .I..i 9,525.OO.. . .9'525'O0.. 8,385.81 .0950 I 80 £EMETERY 4,350-O~ ' .00 .00 362.36 '.0000 82 RETIREMENT 75,518.OO 6,2164.87 6,244.87 6,290.65 .O820 95 FIRE RELIEF ' 46,306.00__ .00 .00 . .3,857.29 .0000 25 ~IATER REVEHUE_ 37'136'OO i 29'966'93 .. 29'966'93 3,093.43 ~ .8070 83 CONTINGENCY 20,000.00 .00 .00L 1,666.00 .0000 TOTALS 2,5OO,627.O0 165,521.79 165,521.79 208,302.26 .0664 CITY OF H(~JND l%und, Ninn~sot~ Honth of Monthly Activity Report of Street Department & Shop ~ ¥Iork Unfts - Month Month to D~t¢. L~st __ ,~ ..... . ...................... ,j ; .... ~ .......... ..... . ....... . ..... ; - ~ /~] :~ o~ 0 qquo~ ~9# '619# 6u!uaatO 'qu!a!.,' ~a~'-;~S ~09# su~no~ ~o~JJO gO9# 'asuI V °qulaH uo~4a~S-- $o qquoH ~qos~uu!~ ~punoM Ol~J]OSI dO iiI3 Page 1 CITY OF MOUND MOUND ~ EINNESOTA EONTH EOnthly .n. ctivity Report of Water Department February, 1980. ~ Work Units ' : ' Month Month to Date to Dar, m ............ ' ................... ~' "' '~ - 3 ...... ~-'-:'x ~ ' m No. of Turn Ohs :' ' I ~/ ~ d d ! ............... i ....... ~ ........... ,: ~ .... :' ' -: - ~0 ' ~f ~`.rn Off~ }'O~-~n[ .... I ...... / .......... '] . I 7 [ l ...... ' ........ , "' '2' -" '-~'~ '~/ ..... ~ .... S3 ? qquoM qguoN qse~I sIq£ ,i 66~# 9~ a~nd P~qD s~m!& 'o'a ~ff mmnd p2Mo~qo [~ amnd p~Mo~qo sam!£ 'o~ ' I# hmnd p~M:zqD s~ia!£ 'oM 096I' ~o qquo~' quamq-~ada(l aaqel,1 $o q.zodaa fqla!q:¥ ~IqquoH ONQOI, t .40 d ~6ed . POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT Cities of MOUNDz SPllING PARK, Month Jarl. MINNETRISTA & ST. BONIFACIUS I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY ACTIVITY Traffic control {citations & warnings) THIS MON TI{ YEA R TO DA TE DWI Property dannage accident Personal injury accident fatal accident .dult felony & misdemeanor arrests 'uvenile felony & nMsdemeanor arrests Aedicals mat conupla int:s .JPart I & ~art I! offenses Other general invt:stigations TOTA !, 459 6 12 7 22 8 24 120 79 886 459 6 12 7 22 8 24 120 79 886 LAST YEAR TO DATE 452 .8 41 6 19 16 !19 58 841 I ,623 I ,623 1,569 II. PROPERTY LOSS. · >./R-ECOVE. R. Y SUh4MARY A~CITIES - JAN. 80 Bikes Boats ITEM $lothi ng ]urrency, notes, etc, Jewelry & precious n-ietals Hmnc Furnishings Radio & Electronic equip~ment iVehiclYs & vehicle equipment !~4 i s c ella n eous i - OTAL STOLEN 475 2,247 1 , 000 1,878 189 8,024 32,831 $ 46,644 7,500 RECOVERED 5,126 $ 12,626 LL CITIES - JAil. 80 III. OFFENSE ACTIVITY SUMMARY o ~ O O ~ · PART I CRIMES~ ~ ~ ~O~ o° O O Adult '~u~5 Homicide Rape ............ .Robbery ...... Assault ~urgla ry. , , ' ~ .... 9 ....... Larceny ..... Vehicle Theft .... 2 2 Arson ........ TOTAL 0 ~3 0 ~ PA R T II CRIM]ES ssault .... ,.2. 2 __ . 1 & Counterfeiting. _ ! 1 __ _ ,. 9 __ 9., 8 l e n-~ e nt 'rope~ty ~m . 9. 9 ,1 , s 1 1 trion & Commercialized Vice .nses .- drug la~vs .... 3 3~ 3 2 _ ~. ag'_ains~t f_z_amily. & childre, n' ..... under the influence '. 6 . ~ 6 - 6 >eac(: . · 4 .. . 4 - .. 2: 1 r offenses 1 i 1 1 ~36 0 36 12 21 2 S.impl e Forgery Fraud Embezzle Stolen Vandali Weapons Prost Sex Offens, Narcotic Gamblin Offens es .Driving Liquo_r____ Public All oth, TOTAL TOTAl, PART I & PART II CRIMES [ 79 ' 79 12 POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT City of_ Moxmd __ A/~onth Oanua r¥ .... Yea r' ! 98_____0 I. GF_NERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY ACTIVITY Traffic control (citations & ~varnings) DWI Property damage accident Personal injury accident Fatal accident ldult.£elony & misdemeanor arrests Juvenile felony & misdemeanor arrests Medicals Animal complaints .Part I & Part II offenses Other general investigations FO TA L THIS MON TH 318 6 5 15 15 "82 45 617 YEA R TO DA TE 318 7 5 15 15 82 45 617 LAST YEAR TO DATE 334 20 0 5 12 11 87 1,117 1,117 4O 478 992 II. loRO~E RTY LOSS ~]CO'VF~ R ¥ SUMMARY MOUND - JAN. 80' Bikes Boats ;lothing ITEM STOLEN 4OO Gurrency, notes, etc. 'ewelry & precious naetals Guns Home Furnishings Radio & }glectron~c equipment 422 1,000 50O relxicles & vehi. cle equipnaent 6,311 Miscellaneous 22,685 TOTAL (for individual city) $ 31,31.8 GRAND TOTAl, (all cities combined) 46, RECOVERED 6,000 1,155 $ 7,155 $ 12,626 IIOUND - JAN. 80 LII. OFFENSE ACTIVITY SUMMARY .. o ~ 0 u~ · ~ART I CRIMES O~ ~ ~D < ~O ~° O Adult Juv. Hon~lcfdc ] ........ ~ ] Rape ........... ....... Robbery .... : ............... A s~j>tt ..................... ~ ........ Bur la ry .......... ~ . 5 5 ~a rcet~Z- ~ 2 ~ 2 . 6-- Vehfcle Theft' ' ......... ~ I ~ ~. .... ....--~0TAL' ', '~ :'*, ......... , ,, ..,,,:'"'~: ' ' ", .,,, ~0 '--I- .... ...... ~ ~~"-I ...... ~-~;~:, : -- PART II CRIMJ~?S S.impl e Assault 2 .... Forr_g'ery & Counterfeiting · Fraud Embezzlement Stolen Property Yandalism 3~..e ajDO n S Prostitution & Commercialized Sex Offcnses Narcotic drug laxvs Gambling Offenses against family & children Driving under the influence Liquor Laws Public Peace All other offenses TOTAL 2 8 1 i 6 25 1 1 6 6 14 TOTAL PART I & PART II CRIMtiTS [ 45 0 45 Feb. 29, 1980 ATToRNfY AT LAW 1503 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55454 612/c~33-54} 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PERFORMED BY TIMOTHY L. PIEPKORN FOR THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE MONTH OF FEB., 1980: hours 1. February 4: Scheduled JuFy Trial(Defendant pled guilty after len§thly negotiations; Prefared formal complaint ........................ 3.25 2. February 5: Scheduled Jury Trial involving question of Law; Judge suggested matter could be resolved by both parties submitting .~ Memorandums of Law ..................................................... 1.O0 3 February 6: Prepared 7 Formal Complaints ................................ 4.00 4. February 8 and 9: Prepared 10 page Memorandum of Law for Judge Rogers... 7.00 5. February 19: Preparation for Jury Trial; telephone calls to all witnesses; prepared opening and final arguments, etc ................... 4.50 6. February 20, 21: two day Jury Trial .................................... 14.00 7. February 27: Arraignments and 4 Pre-Trial Conferences .................. 3.00 36.75 hours TOTAL BILL ....... ($300 for 15 hours and $30.00 for 21.75 hours) ........... $952.50 LESS DISCOUNT .............................................................. $152.50 TOTAL OI4ING .................................................................. $800. O0 · Telephone 473-7357 CITY of ORONO Post Office Box 66 * Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 - Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka March 3, 1980 Mound City Hall 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: I have been in contact with the administration office of the State of Minnesota Cable Communications Board requesting assistance from them in gathering information to aid us in re- viewing factors'and criteria relevant to considering cable TV service to our area. Vicky Long, a member of the State Communications Board, has agreed to meet with representatives of our communities on Thursday, March 13, 1980 at 7:00 P.M. to answer any questions that we might have on the matter. The meeting will be held at the Orono Council Chambers, 1275 Brown Road South, and will be chaired by Mayor Van Nest. If this is of interest to your community, please feel free to attend or appoint a representative of your community to participate in this informative public information meeting. Sincerely, Ci~ Administrator CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota March 3, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-91 SUBJECT: Insurance Retent!on Police Officer Hartigan was placed on Medical Disability on February 2nd. Under the Clause of the term life insurance carried on employees, Hartigan may continue carrying the term insurance. The Policy reads as follows: However, if the termination of his employment is the result of: (a) disability, his insurance under the Personal Life Insurance Benefit Section may be continued in force in accordance, with the Total Disability Benefits provision; In order to clarify the situation, it may be well for the Council to pass a resolution recognizing that he was placed on medica! disability and authorize the continuance of him carrying the insurance. .... "a,'qd k Rq.r;C!;. ~ ;' ......... '~,h,(, 1 ' '- *-" '.:,o~;~' ' q .... ')-;,.,.,,.~,..,''''~'''''' ik)~:;].:~.. ....~ ".:elson.; Ix)ts_. 2 ;]ad o,, ~31o(:".: '17-O:'.O.7, '-..'i'-." '"'-~ .... 'v}~o}= (]o hoe ~so [~m.mmtot;d r:C-,fl · . ~.n" ~'~,.,.... l'h~s!i cn(:~ :, Lots 17, 12, 19, and ...'~0, 3lock 11-""' ~'- , ..... ~c ...... '53 , .clock 1] ,),:....u:~, ][nnovor - Lolls ~3, ~,'', and [5, '~[ock [[~;~e;[on~' "~ Eo Lbo Ct'r,,] .... . of };ound and ~:ero pt~%ch3sed ~o~ dovelol~mon2 of a Eot Eot:, The C[t:y owns LoE d wlttcb a!)~'~s Lois 13, E4, and [5, 3lock ~Ltan. d has ,. L O:., I ...... i,D~O lots, Ne]soos, :nd D~_xons have had drni. nage problems ~ ' C1] }'{O]]tq(.[ ~ , 1,-1 -,r,~--. ~.~ ..... .. ~. ~,,_, pFoporE]; OWl'IOF3 m:!Enall}r so]_vod mosE OF the dra~.oaZe ptTo- and ~No ~'~,.~o,_.'~' .l',-oolem~ ' - (wi. th si_It:} was solved. . hv sprea.2i.n/l ~?ed :tFock For the F~_rs2 ti. me h't R yeor$. '"~e]_],,,-,::'. ... .... , :r-]qo,!o,- ~', ......... :)ixons. 3tq(] 2, ndorso')r; t.,'J_ll provide r~,'l. ..... tool<. ~)r~tmmon(] Road ir r:eeded. ~fe don't t,,ank tho road because ~,'i.l.] (:;:'o;?ko water proh!ems i:~ o~r ye]-ds and basomeT~:t:s. X'PI. SOPS, NtJel!ors~ a~qd l)~xoqs i-,'o~]ld t-o,:l~i.]/'o re2oi!qJ_Tl$ walls lo~s ab~]tL::'[;~3 DFt.];~nmop'l ~:osd, }[one og h]~em want tl}Io ' ~/(]l~S ~'~:"'" ~ rtl]No ~qr(~ ~()W CS'-';%~ ' iu !"t,c}nvv ~73. i_n~:~lls. TI}:i.s was proved i.n trite 1;ls~ 5" whelm t}qo b~n.k:~ sqayod i:-. pi. oeo and (lbo re~ai.nins wu. Ils ;,.*-t~;: r:e].q, apsed. ~)]-,]mmond ?o:ld has nOVOl? boon maintai, ned Wql'tE %0 i_I!q])i'OVC .Dk~;l!fdTh):td ~',Orld :Fo;c ,v, ccoss tO ]'l~.S ti'to c:os~ ol 1:Ne road and maintenance o~ i.~. '.5'27 ~'~: 3'h~ C.(~y Country /vlound~ /v~innes~'a THE UNDERSIGNED, bein5 homeowners 810n~ the ends 280 ~-t east o~ Amhur~9 and *fee.' intersects u~th L~ne at the wes1: ?oral langfh af ~ecfion bein3 two blocks and lSB radius. endon~ered b~ i~ 9J~ t~oc~ wid~ S~ree~. ~ ~/e do no? h~ve e need ~'or a~ &tree? parklr.j in li3ht* of the ~R