The URL can be used to link to this page

2018-11-27 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community, AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2018 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Opening meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff, recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence. Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item from the Consent Agenda forthis purpose is not required or appropriate. 4. *Consent Agenda Page *A. Approve payment of claims 2351 -2377 *B. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for Property at 2377-2399 6072 Cherrywood Road 2380 *C. Approve Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for Property 2400-2423 at 3020 Highland Boulevard 2401 Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. hiformation/Miscellaneous A. Comments/Reports from Council members B. Reports: C. Minutes: DCC — September 20, 2018 2424 Planning Commission — 10-2-18 2432 10-30-18 2439 D. Correspondence: MN Dept of Health — 2017 Water Fluoridation Quality Award 2445 City of Mound Vacancies — Candidates Sought 2447 City of Mound Notice of Recount 2448 7. Adjourn November URcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! 11 December - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 11 December - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 28 November — 9:30 AM — Recount of 6 November General Election Council Seat #2 Votes Mound City Council Chambers 25 December — all Regular Meetings cancelled in observance of Christmas per 10/09/18 Item 7 action 8 January — 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 8 January — 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 22 January— 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 22 January — 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting Council Appointee Interviews (26 January — Special Olympics Polar Plunge at Surfside Park and Beach wateff^ont) 29 January — 7:00 PM — Special Meeting Workshop to interview Council appointment candidates per 11/13/18 Regular Meeting Agenda Item 4C Action 12 February — 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 12 February— 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 26 February — 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 26 February — 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting City Offices Closed December 24, 2018 (Christmas Eve Half-day Holiday) December 25, 2018 (Christmas Day Holiday) December 31, 2018 (New Year's Eve Half-day Holiday) January 1, 2019 (New Year's Day Holiday) City Official's Absences Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Inquire in advance. Tease..... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision- making. City of Mound Claims 11-27-18 BATCH • DOLLAR 2018 110918CTY2 $ 5.87 2018 UBREFND1118 $ 337.17 2018 110918DVS $ 6,089.51 2018 111318CTYMAN $ 3,279.78 2018 PAYREQ111318 $ 16,091.21 2018 GE ELECTPR $ 41646.18 2018 112118CTY AN $ 121293.91 2018 112718CITY $ 641150.29 2018 112718HS $ 99,457.10 CLAIMS 206351.02 2351 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/18 9:36 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Batch Name 110918CTY2 Payment Computer Dollar Amt $5.87 Posted Refer 13 JUBILEE FOODS Ck# 057506 11/9/2018 Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies GARBAGE BAGS- HWS $5.87 Invoice 103118-2 10/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/9/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5.87 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $5.87 Pre -Written Checks $5.87 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $5.87 $5.87 2352 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1810:40 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Batch Name UBREFUND1118 User Dollar Amt $337.17 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $337.17 $0,00 In Balance Refer 22 MINNETONKA TITLE, INC. _ Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 3072 DUNDEE LN - D. WEGLEITNER- $125.00 UTILITY REFUND- MINNETONKA TITLE Invoice 112018 11/16/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $125.00 Refer 21 RESULTS TITLE- EP Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2028 GRANDVIEW BLVD - M. & J. DREXLER- $212.17 UTILITY REFUND- RESULTS TITLE EDEN PRAIRIE Invoice 112018 11/16/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $212.17 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 601 WATER FUND $337.17 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $337.17 Total $337.17 $337.17 2353 CITY OF MOUND 11/09/18 10:46 AM Page 1 Payments Invoice 110918 11/9/2018 Transaction Date 11/9/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $672.59 Refer 2WAYZATA, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA 2018 FORD F-550 4 X 4 CREW CAB #218- $2,252.81 ..25875 MOTOR VEHICLE SALES TAX, REGISTRATION, TITLE -FILING FEES - STREETS DEPT Invoice 110918 11/9/2018 Transaction Date 11/9/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,252.81 Refer .�1�WAYZATA, CtTYOF,�,,w Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA 2018 FORD F-550 4 X 4 CREW CAB #318- $3,164.11 ..25876 MOTOR VEHICLE SALES TAX, REGISTRATION, TITLE -FILING FEES - STREETS DEPT Invoice 110918 11/9/2018 Transaction Date 11/9/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,164.11 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $6.089.51 $6,089.51 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,089.51 Total $6,089.51 2354 CITY OF MOUND 11/13/189:15 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Batch Name 111318CTYMAN User Dollar Amt $3,279.78 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $3,279.78 $0.00 In Balance Refer 15 POSTMASTER Cash Payment E 101-41110-322 Postage POSTAGE CITY CONTACT NEWSLETTER - $959.97 NOV DEC 2018 & JAN 2019 EDITION Invoice 111318 11/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/13/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $959,97 Refer 16 StEHR, REBECCA Cash Payment _ G 281-22000 Deposits REFUND LOST LAKE DOCK SLIP KEY $50.00 DEPOSIT- R. SIEHR Invoice 111318 11/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/13/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $50.00 Refer 14 WAYZATA, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-43100-500 Capital Outlay FA 2018 FORD F-550 4 X 4 CREW CAB #218- $2,269.81 ..25875 MOTOR VEHICLE SALES TAX, REGISTRATION, TITLE -FILING FEES - STREETS DEPT Invoice 111318 11/9/2018 Transaction Date 11/13/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,269.81 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $3,229.78 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $50.00 $3,279.78 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $3,279.78 Total $3,279.78 2355 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/18 9:38 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Batch Name PAYREQ111318 Payment Computer Dollar Amt $16,091.21 Posted Refer 3 BARBER CONSTRUCTION, INC Ck# 057577 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 401-43110-500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQ #3 & FINAL- WORK COMPLETED $13,553.23 11/7/17 THRU 11/7/18- 2017 RETAINING WALL IMPROV PROJECTS- PW 17-04 Invoice 111318 11/7/2018 Project PW1704 Transaction Date 11/14/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,553.23 Refer 5 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION Ck# 057578 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 401-43117-300 Professional Srvs CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING 2017 $166.00 STREET IMPROV PROJECTS- PW 17-01 LYNWOOD/FAIRVIEW- THRU 10-26-18 Invoice 8149465 11/7/2018 Project PW1701 Cash Payment E 401-43137-300 Professional Srvs CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS TESTING 2017 $166.00 STREET IMPROV PROJECTS- PW 17-02 MAYWOOD/WILSHIRE/HIDDENVALE- THRU 10-26-18 Invoice 8149465 11/7/2018 Project PW1702 Transaction Date 11/14/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $332.00 Refer 2 MINGER CONSTRUCTION, INC. Ck# 057579 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 675-49425-500 Capital Outlay FA PAY REQUEST #2 & FINAL- 2018 STORM $1,365.98 DRAINAGE IMPROV PROD PW 18-08- 4857 ISLANDVIEW DR - WORK COMPLETED 9-6- 18 THRU 10-18-18 Invoice 111318 10/18/2018 Project PW1808 Transaction Date 11/14/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,365.98 Refer 4 NORLINGS LAKE MINNETONKA W Ck# 057580 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 401-43147-300 Professional Srvs INSTALL TOPSOIL & SEED @ 5190 $840.00 LYNWOOD BLVD- 2017 STREET IMPROV PROD PW 17-03- LANDSCAPE REPAIR Invoice 34368 9/21/2018 Project PW1703 Transaction Date 11/1412018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $840.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $1,365.98 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $14.725.23 $16,091.21 Pre -Written Checks $16,091.21 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $16,091.21 2356 CITY OF MOUND 11n5n8*07FM Page Payments Invoice 111*18 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11x512018 Due Wells Fargo 10100 Total $167.48 Refer 41 ANDERSON, SUSAN Ck# 057582 11/15/2018 Cash Payment s 1u1-*141u-3ooProfessional Snm GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $38.00 p*< WORKED SATURDAY, NOV 3RD 2n1e Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15o018 Due Wells Fargo 10100 Tvta| $no.*o Refer 13AUDETTE, STEPHEN Ck# 057583 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 1o1-*141n'aooProfessional amo GENERAL ELECTION 11-o0'10 ELECTION *77.20 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11m/201e Transaction Date 11/15/2018 oven Wells Fargo 10100 Tota| $77.20 Cash Payment s1n1-*141anonProfessional ams GENERAL ELECTION 11 -Us -1u -ELECTION $67.55 JUDGE PAY mvuioo 111*18 11m/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due Wells Fargo 10100 Tum| *Or.nn Refer 43 BRICKLEY, DAVID Ck# 057585 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 1m-^1*no-3onProfessional omo oEwsnxL ELcon0w 11-06-18 ELECTION $106.15 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11m/2018 Transaction Date 11n5m018 Due Wells Fargo 10100 Total $106.15 Refer 34 BUTTERFIELD, ALLEENE Ck# 057586 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 1m-^1110-3onProfessional Smo GENERAL ELECTION 11-0*10 ELECTION $72.38 JUDGE PAY mmxoe 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11n5o018 Due Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.38 Refer 23 CAMPBELL, REBECCA Ck# 057587 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E1O1-*1*10-unOProfessional nnm GENERAL ELECTION 11 -06 -10 -ELECTION *144.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11mu018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11*.75 Refer 15 CARLSON, RONALD Ck# 057588 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E1o1-^141n-aooProfessional smn GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 ELECTION $82.03 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 110/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due Wells Fargo 10100 Tum| *82.03 Refer 4 CHRISTOPHERSEN, JANET Ck# 057589 11/15/2018 Cash Payment s1o1-*1*10-onOProfessional Sno GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 ELECTION *1*4.75 JUDGE PAY CITY OF MOUND 11/15/18 4:07 PM Page 2 Payments 2358 Current Period: November 2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.75 Refer 17 DASCHER, SHARON Ck# 057590 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $67.55 TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6!2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.55 Refer 10 DOEPNER-HOVE, STACY Ck# 057591 11!15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $172.55 HEAD JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11!6!2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $172.55 Refer 28 GREENSLIT, JACKIE Ck# 057592 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $173.70 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $173.70 Refer 35 HENDLEY, RON Ck# 057593 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $72.38 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.38 Refer 2 HEYSTEK, HENRI Ck# 057594 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $91.68 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $91.68 Refer 5 JOHANSEN, KEVIN Ck# 057595 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $144.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6!2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.75 Refer 26 JOHNSON, B.J. Ck# 057596 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $135.10 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11!6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $135.10 Refer 25 KABELLA, BECKY Ck# 057597 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $173.70 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $173.70 Refer 40 KOHLS, PATRICIA Ck# 057598 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $67.55 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.55 Refer 39 LARSEN, JAMES A. Ck# 057599 11/15/2018 2358 CITY OF MOUND 11/15/18 4:07 PM Page 3 Payments 2359 Current Period: November 2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $144.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.75 Refer 36 LIBKE, KAREN Ck# 057600 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $77.20 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77,20 Refer 33 LIBKE, ROBERT Ck# 05760111 /15/2018 nwu x, F Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $72.38 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.38 Refer 18 LWKERT, GEORGE Ck# 057602 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $144.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 � Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.75 Refer 8LINKERT,JANET Ck# 057603 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $144.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 � viCk# Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.75 Refer 37 MCCAtJLEY, MARY 057604 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $67.55 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.55 Refer 11 MCKENZIE, MARY D. Ck# 057605 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $77.20 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 1116/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.20 Refer 31 MCKENZIE, SCOT Ck# 057606 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $77.20 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.20 Refer 3 MELSNESS, LARRY Ck# 057607 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $106.15 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11!6/2018 Transaction Date � 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $106.15 Refer 22 MEYER, PETER C.�,��«,� Ck# 057608 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $67.55 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 2359 CITY OF MOUND 11/15/184:07 PM Page 4 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.55 Refer 21 MURPHY, SCOTTA. Ck# 057609 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $77.20 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.20 Refer 38 OBRIEN, JASON Ck# 057610 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $67.55 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.55 Refer 29 REUPER, JAMES Ck# 057611 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $106.58 HEAD JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $106.58 Refer 19 ROBBINS, JACKIE Ck# 057612 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - HEAD $218.23 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $218.23 Refer 7 SCHWALBE, VERNON Ck# 057613 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $149.58 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $149.58 Refer 30 SING -LYNCH, LUANN Ck# 057614 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $111.65 HEAD JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $111.65 Refer 27 SKRAMSTAD, NANCY Ck# 057615 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $67.55 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.55 Refer 24 STADSKLEV, JOLEEN Ck# 057616 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $72.38 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $72.38 Refer 9 STARR, NANCY Ck# 057617 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $173.70 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $173.70 Refer 16 STUHR, BRENDA Ck# 057618 11/15/2018 2360 CITY OF MOUND 11/15/18 4:07 PM Page 5 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $149.58 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $149.58 Refer 42 SWENSON, STEVE Ck# 057619 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $106.15 JUDGE & TRAINING PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $106.15 Refer 14 VERTNICK, DEBRA Ck# 057620y 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $67.55 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $67.55 Refer 12 VINSON, LISA Ck# 057621 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $144.75 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 111612018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $144.75 Refer 20WEISS SMITH_, GRETCHEN Ck# 057622 11/15/2018�� Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $77.20 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77.20 Refer 32 WILLIAMS, KRISTIE Ck# 057623 11/15!2018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-300 Professional Srvs GENERAL ELECTION 11-06-18 - ELECTION $77.20 JUDGE PAY Invoice 111418 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/15/2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $77,20 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $4,646.18 $4,646.18 Pre -Written Checks $4,646.18 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $4,646.18 2361 CI'T'Y OF MOUND 11/20/18 2:26 PM Page 1 Payments Invoice 6974-336731 11/6/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-212 Motor Fuels TRUFUEL 50-1 PREMIX $15.72 Invoice 6974-335966 10/27/2018 Refer 26 KOOPMEN, TROY Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair HEATER CORE- FIRE DEPT $22.94 Invoice 6974-335634 10/24/2018 1732 CANARY - BP #2016-00816 -NEW $5,000.00 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 � Wells Fargo 10100 Total $38.66 Refer29 CAROUEST OF NAVARRE (P/W) Cash Payment E602-49450-210 Operating Supplies OIL & FUEL FILTERS- PUB WRKS VEHICLE $20.60 11/19/2018 #1005 Invoice 6974-335768 10/25/2018 Cash Payment E602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974-333979 10/4/2018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 6974-334174 10/8/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 6974-334534 10/11/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974-335175 10118/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply Invoice 6974-335175 10/18/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies Invoice 6974-335440 10/22/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply SHOP SUPPLIES- OIL, LUBE, OIL & FUEL $119.33 FILTERS, HYDRAULIC FITTINGS- PUB WORKS Project 18-3 HEADLIGHT XTRA VISION- STREETS DEPT $41.98 VEHICLE PAINTED ROTOR, BREAK PADS, OIL & AIR $177.17 FILTERS- VEHICLE #113 WATER DEPT FUEL, LUBE, OIL FILTER- GENERATORS $40.23 FITTINGS- PARKS Z -TURN MOWER $26.26 BATTERIES- PARTS- LEAF SUCKER & $58.60 PARKS STYGA PAINTED ROTOR, BREAK PADS- VEHICLE $146.22 #113 WATER DEPT Invoice 6974-335451 10/22/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $630.39 Refer 26 KOOPMEN, TROY Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow 1732 CANARY - BP #2016-00816 -NEW $5,000.00 CONSTRUCTION ESCROW REFUND- T. KOOPMAN Invoice 112118 11/19/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 33 ORONO, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners Invoice 20141228 11/19/2018 HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM $258.00 FEES OCT 2018 2362 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/18 2:26 PM Page 2 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $258.00 Refer 23 RADDE, MATTHEW C. Cash Payment E 602-49450-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2018 BOOT ALLOWANCE $199.95 REIMBURSEMENT - M. RADDE Invoice 112118 11/19/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $199.95 Refer24 ROAL, ADAM & LINDSEiY� Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow 5459 BARTLETT- BP #2017 -01005 -NEW $5,000.00 CONSTRUCTION ESCROW REFUND- A. ROAL Invoice 112118 11/19/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,000.00 Refer 32 ST. LOUIS PARK, CITY OF Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE -1ST NIGHT LODGING- G $215.83 PEDERSON - HILTON CLEARWATER BEACH HOTEL FOR VOL CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE 11-7-18 Invoice 112118 11/20/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE -1ST NIGHT LODGING- G PALM- $215.83 HILTON CLEARWATER BEACH HOTEL FOR VOL CHIEFS & OFFICERS SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE 11-7-18 Invoice 112118 11/20/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $431.66 Refer 27 VERIZON WIRELESS Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE LADDER TRUCK #44 $35.01 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi SEWER TRUCK #109 DATACARD SVC 10-11- $35.01 18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON $35.01 DATACARD SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Project 18-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC $35.01 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Project 18-3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 10-11-18 $17.51 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 10-11-18 $17.50 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY $35.01 OFFICER 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-1818 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #39 FIRE CHIEF $35.01 RESCUE UTILITY 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE #43 RESCUE TRUCK $35.01 SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 101MME9120911 Payments 11/20/18 2:26 PM Page 3 Current Period: November 2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 SVC 10- $35.01 11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #315 DATACARD SVC 10-11- $35.01 18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #512 R. PRICH DATACARD $35.01 SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.51 SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.50 SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT SPOT- $35.01 SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $35.01 SPOT 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- $35.01 INTERNET SVC- 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $35.05 TABLET- INTERNET SVC- 10-11-18 THRU 11- 10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Project 18-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $35.01 TABLET- HOT SPOT SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11- 10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Project 18-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.50 SPOT- SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.51 SPOT- SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $35.01 SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NEW STREETS TABLET DATACARD $35.01 INTERNET SVC 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET SVC $17.50 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET SVC $17.51 10-11-18 THRU 11-10-18 Invoice 9818123911 11/10/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $735.25 2364 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: November 2018 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $10,594.90 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $645.37 601 WATER FUND $445.92 602 SEWER FUND $607.72 $12,293.91 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $12,293.91 Total $12,293.91 2365 11/20/18 2:26 PM Page 4 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/18 11:49 AM Page 1 Payments 2366 Current Period: November 2018 Batch Name 112718CITY User Dollar Amt $64,150.29 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $64,150.29 $0.00 In Balance Refer 4 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maintenance LED LIGHT FIXTURES- 2 QTY- STREET $1,917.14 LIGHTS Invoice 32981 11/9/2018 Cash Payment E 401-43117-500 Capital Outlay FA 2017 STREET IMPROV PROJ-LYNWOOD- $12,896.00 BELMONT-ULTRA SONIC OPEN CHANNEL FLOW METER- PW 17-01 Invoice 32991 11/13/2018 P024840 Project PW1701 Transaction Date 11/14/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $14,813.14 Referee 5 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RES TROO Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) PHILBROOK PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $63.57 10- 10-18 THRU 11-6-18 Invoice W701305 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $270.72 10- 10-18 THRU 11-6-18 Invoice W701302 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) MOUND BAY PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $489.00 10- 10-18 THRU 11-6-18 Invoice W701303 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 10-10- $253.00 18 THRU 11-6-18 Invoice W701304 11/7/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,076.29 Refer 17 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying NOVEMBER 2018- COPIER RENTAL- FIRE $31.75 DEPT Invoice 19440599 11/12/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.75 Refer 6 CENTERPOINT ENERGY (MINNEG Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 9-18-18 TO 10-18-18 $64.21 Invoice 112718 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 9-18-18 TO 10-18-18 $363.84 Invoice 112718 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 9-18-18 TO 10-18-18 $281.28 Invoice 112718 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 9-18-18 TO 10-18-18 $723.97 Invoice 112718 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 9-18-18 TO 10-18-18 $152.59 Invoice 112718 11/8/2018 Project 18-3 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 9-18-18 TO 10-18-18 $47.20 Invoice 112718 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities GAS SVC 9-18-18 TO 10-18-18- DEPOT BLDG $70.38 Invoice 112718 11/8/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,703.47 Refer 2 DISPLAY SALES 2366 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies C9 AMBER LED FLAME TRANSPARENT $221.50 BULBS FOR 32" CANDLE WREATHS- 25 QTY, F-15 AMBER LED BULBS- 25 QTY- HOLIDAY LITES Invoice 017090 11/7/2018 Transaction Date 11/14/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $221.50 Refer 7 DPC INDUSTRIES, INC. Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals 150# CHLORINE CYLINDER RENTAL $130.00 Invoice 82000124-18 10/31/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $130.00 Refer 27 ELAN COMPANIES��#��n�t Cash Payment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maintenance STREET LIGHTING MTCE FALL 2018 & $4,861.27 CHANGING OUT OF (10) EA 250W HPS WITH 115WLEDS Invoice JC10182053 11/20/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,861.27 Refer 31 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 1 QTY - OMNI 3" 1000 GAL METER, GASKET $1,899.71 HEX BOLTS -NUTS Invoice J775674 11/9/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 3 QTY I PERL WATER METERS $585.00 Invoice J775410 11/9/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies 16 QTY 3/4S IPERL 1000 G 3-TRM WATER $2,000.00 METERS Invoice J790771 11/12/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,484.71 Refer 1 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, I Cash Payment G 101-23425 5293 SHORELINE PC18-16 5293 SHORELINE DRIVE CUP - MISC $213.75 PLANNING SVCS OCT 2018 Invoice 015-015-39 11/11/2018 Cash Payment G 101-23426 PC 18-17 6072 CHERRYWO 6072 CHERRYWOOD PC 18-17 SHORELINE $183.75 DRIVE CUP - MISC PLANNING SVCS OCT 2018 Invoice 015-015-39 11/11/2018 Cash Payment G 101-234243020 HIGHLAND PC18-15 J 3020 HIGHLAND - PC 18-15- MISC $40.00 PLANNING SVCS OCT 2018 Invoice 015-015-39 11/11/2018 Cash Payment G 101-23427 2072 SHOREWOOD EP PC 5293 SHORELINE DRIVE CUP - MISC $386.25 PLANNING SVCS OCT 2018 Invoice 015-015-39 11/11/2018 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs MOUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040 & $1,050.00 MISC PLANNING SVCS OCTOBER 2018 Invoice 007-001-123 11/11/2018 Transaction Date 11/14/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,873.75 Refer 20 HOVERSTEN, ERIC Cash Payment E 101-41310-331 Use of personal auto REIMS MILEAGE- CITY MEETINGS- BOLTON $163.50 & MENK, MCWD, MPLS & MTKA CITY HALLS, EARL BROWN CTR, SHOREWOOD COMM CTR, CRYSTAL PW - E. HOVERSTEN SEPT THRU NOV 2018 Invoice 112718 11/18/2018 2367 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Invoice 680676 11/15/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,540.00 Refer 8 KENNEDYAND GRAVEN Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs MOUND HARBOR RFQ & PURCHASE $192.50 AGREEMENT LEGAL SVCS SEPTEMBER Invoice 38192 11/13/2018 2018 Invoice 145481 11/8/2018 2 PAIRS GLOVES- T. PALM- PARKS $22.78 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $192.50 Refer 9 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR Wells Fargo 10100 Total $155.74 Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $582.58 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies OVERAGE - 10-14-18 THRU 11-13-18 $8.02 Invoice 2956990 11/7/2018 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - B & W $200.06 3V LITHIUM BATTERIES- FIRE DEPT OVERAGE - 10-14-18 THRU 11-13-18 Invoice 2956990 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA 8200 PW COPIER $6.11 OVERAGE CHG 10-10-18 THRU 11-09-18 Invoice 2955045 11/5/2018 Project 18-3 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $788,75 Refer 10 MEDIACOM Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 11-16-18 THRU $96.90 12-15-18 Invoice 112718 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $96.90 Refer 11 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH _ Cash Payment R 601-49400-37170 State fee - Water 4TH QTR 2018 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,752.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Invoice 112718 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 �30 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,752.00 Refer�ro NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMEN Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies 15W LED WORKLIGHT, 18 W LED BEACON- $132.96 PARKS STYGA Invoice 38192 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 2 PAIRS GLOVES- T. PALM- PARKS $22.78 Invoice 38192 11/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $155.74 Refer 13 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies ENVELOPES- #10 - FIRE DEPT $8.02 Invoice 228263057002 11/8/2018 PO 24935 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies 2 QTY 1" CLEAR BINDERS, AA ALKALINE & $34.61 3V LITHIUM BATTERIES- FIRE DEPT Invoice 228263057001 11/7/2018 PO 24935 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies 2 BOXES ENVELOPES -4.37 X 5.75 100 BOX - $14.22 FIRE DEPT Invoice 228265063001 11/7/2018 PO 24935 2368 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 4 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $56.85 Refer 12 OFFICE DEPOT $71.00 Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies 3 TAB MANILLA FILE FOLDERS, LAMINATING $37.64 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 POUCHES, LIQUID PAPER CORRECTION $71.00 Refer 16 XCEt ENERGY TAPE- CITY HALL Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities Invoice 228497145001 11/7/2018 PO 25036 $4,784.95 Cash Payment E 101-41410-200 Office Supplies DYMO LABELS- ELECTIONS $14.71 Invoice 228497145001 11/7/2018 PO 25036 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies 2 CASES COPY PAPER- HWS $83.74 Invoice 229328622001 11/9/2018 PO 25101 ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $234.37 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $136.09 Refer 14 RITEWAY BUSINESS FORMS & DI DEPOT BLDG Cash Payment E 101-41500-200 Office Supplies LASER W2S & ENVELOPES, W3, 1099s & $226.52 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 1096 FORMS Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Invoice 18-85309 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $226.52 Refer 3 SIMPLEX GRINNELL Cash Payment E 222-42260-440 Other Contractual Servic ALARM & DETECTION MONITORING 12-01-18 $187.50 THRU 11-30-19 FIRE DEPT Invoice 20582314 11/1/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41930-440 Other Contractual Servic ALARM & DETECTION MONITORING 12-01-18 $187.50 THRU 11-30-19 CITY HALL Invoice 20582314 11/1/2018 Transaction Date 11/14/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $375.00 Refer 18 WACONIA FORD MERCURY Cash Payment E 601-49400-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs REPAIR TRUCK #512 FORD F-350- WATER $5,565.24 DEPT- REPLACE CATALYST, SENSOR, EGR COOLER CORE, GASKETS, TUBE ASSEMBLY Invoice FOCS125996 10/31/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,565.24 Refer 15 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic PERMIT FOR INVCE #4528--- REPAIR $71.00 FORCEMAIN @ FERNSIDE 10-3-18 Invoice 4532 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $71.00 Refer 16 XCEt ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC 10-03-18 THRU 11-02-18 CITY $4,784.95 OWNED STREET LIGHTS Invoice 614126755 11/5/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,784.95 Refer 19XCEL ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $234.37 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18- $55.72 DEPOT BLDG Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $3,127.82 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 2369 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 5 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $1,717.70 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $2,977.34 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $1,525.37 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41930-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $1,260.09 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $1,260.09 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 101-41910-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $910.76 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 285-46388-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $1,935.11 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 101-42115-381 Electric Utilities ELECTRIC SVC - 9-25-18 TO 10-25-18 $45.00 Invoice 615270737 11/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/20/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15,049.37 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $23,303.53 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1,900.03 285 HRA/HARBOR DISTRICT $1,935.11 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $12,896.00 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $192.50 601 WATER FUND $18,909.29 602 SEWER FUND $3,357.52 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $1,656.31 $64,150.29 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $64,150.29 Total $64,150.29 2370 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page I Payments Current Period: November 2018 Batch Name 112718HWS User Dollar Amt $99,457.10 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $99,457.10 $0.00 In Balance Refer I AMPHORA IMPORTS LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $149.33 Invoice 4305 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $9.00 Invoice 4305 11/1412018 Transaction Date 11/1912018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $158.33 Refer 2 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$50.00 Invoice 438066 10119/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$19,62 Invoice 438575 10/24/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $281.50 Invoice 3304561 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $896.00 Invoice 3306310 11/15/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,107.88 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS $37.80 Invoice 0098568700 11/12/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $24.00 Invoice 0098568700 11/12/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R MDSE- GIFT BAGS $41.50 Invoice 0098568700 11/12/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $21.25 Invoice 0098605800 11/16/2018 Cash Payment E609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES, BAGS & DUM DUM POPS $219.90 Invoice 0098563400 11/9/2018 Transaction Date 11119/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $344.45 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $474.00 Invoice 0066871200 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.10 Invoice 0066871200 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,166.65 Invoice 0066967700 11/2/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $276.20 Invoice 0067066400 11/6/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.10 Invoice 0067066400 11/6/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,927.05 Refer 5 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,887.40 Invoice 463909 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,887,40 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/18 11:49 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Refer 6 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,791.15 Invoice 1090930829 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $87.00 Invoice 1090930828 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,877.39 Invoice 1090930827 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,609.93 Invoice 1090933521 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $116.30 Invoice 1090933522 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,481.77 Refer�� 8 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $72.00 Invoice 1080887121 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,197.51 Invoice 1080887119 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $132.00 Invoice 1080887120 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $82.60 Invoice 1080887121 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,484.11 Refer 7 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $44.00 Invoice 1080883543 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $36.00 Invoice 1080883543 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,438.25 Invoice 1080883541 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $238.86 Invoice 1080883542 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $100.30 Invoice 1080881665 11/1/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,857.41 Refer 9 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,575.85 Invoice 2187387 11/13/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $35.90 Invoice 2187388 11/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $7,611.75 Refer 10 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO. Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $478.22 Invoice 130-2538 11/8/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $478,22 Refer 11 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $719.52 Invoice 3609207069 11/12/2018 2372 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 � Wells Fargo 10100 Total $719.52 Refer 12 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $927.95 Invoice 1385567 11/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $927.95 Refer 13 FLAHERTY S HAPPY TYME COMP Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $171.00 Invoice 35195 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $171.00 Refer 14 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale LIQUOR $349.50 Invoice 00048564 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 00048564 11/8/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 , Wells Fargo 10100 Total $354.00 Refer 15 HAMMERHEART BREWING COMP�� Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $48.00 Invoice 2018-713 11/16/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $48.00 Refer 16 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,604.50 Invoice 104152 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,071.00 Invoice 105591 11/15/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,675.50 Refer, 17 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,528.00 Invoice 2904546 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$36.90 Invoice 2866570 11/2/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $73,80 Invoice 2904547 11/7/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,564.90 Refer 18 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $84.95 Invoice 2917000 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,171.05 Invoice 2916999 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,256.00 Refer 20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$304.00 Invoice 507301 10/22/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$9.00 Invoice 507302 10/22/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$35.67 Invoice 507439 10/23/2018 2373 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 4 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -$348.67 Refer 19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR�� Cash Payment Invoice 1146476 Cash Payment Invoice 1146474 Cash Payment Invoice 1146475 Cash Payment Invoice 1146477 Cash Payment Invoice 1146178 E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX 11/7/2018 10100 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 11/7/2018 21 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 11/7/2018 E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR 11/7/2018 E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE 11/712018 11/14/2018 $148.00 $4,329.49 $4,929.35 $325.75 $126.12 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $9,858.71 Refer 21 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $6,977.62 Invoice 1152166 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $4,219.90 Invoice 1152167 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $428.55 Invoice 1153492 11/15/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $11,626.07 Refer 22 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $184.00 Invoice 16858 11/15/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $184.00 Refer 23 MINNEHAHA BUILDING MAINTENA Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic WASH WINDOWS INSIDE & OUT 10-15-18 $65.19 Invoice 180118889 11/4/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $65.19 Refer 24 MINNESTALGIA WINERY��_�� Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $172.50 Invoice 4930 11/13/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $172.50 Refer 25 MODIST BREWING CO. LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $198.50 Invoice 12942 11/17/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $198.50 Refer 26 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals DECEMBER 2018 COMMON AREA MTCE & $1,315.32 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 112718 12/1/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,315.32 Refer 27 PAINTER CREEK WINERY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $384.00 Invoice 11022020 11/9/2018 2374 CITY OF MOUND 11/20/18 11:49 AM Page 5 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $64.00 Invoice 11022019 11/9/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $448.00 Refer 28 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $496.00 Invoice 30475 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.75 Invoice 30475 1118/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,158.00 Invoice 30857 11112/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $16.25 Invoice 30857 11112/2018 Transaction Date 11119/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,679.00 Refer 29 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $910.75 Invoice 2452756 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $788.25 Invoice 2452755 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $190.90 Invoice 2452757 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$290.00 Invoice 308590 10/4/2018 Transaction Date 11/1912018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,599.90 Refer 30 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,648.40 Invoice 2456861 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $859.35 Invoice 2456862 11/1412018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,507.75 Refer 31 PLUNKETT S, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-440 Other Contractual Servic CONTRACTED PEST CONTROL SVC 11-08- $52,02 18 HWS Invoice W16751350 11/8/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $52.02 Refer 32 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $198.14 Invoice 2305505 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $198.14 Refer 33 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 11-15-18 $15.00 EDITION Invoice S0655406 1111/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 11-30-18 $15.00 EDITION Invoice S0659733 11/1/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $30.00 Refer 35 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M 091111i CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 6 Payments Current Period: November 2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $143.95 Invoice 1753707 11/16/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $77,00 Invoice 1753706 11/16/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $339.90 Invoice 5035332 11/1612018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $560.85 Refer 34 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,358.00 Invoice 1750265 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,170.77 Invoice 1750264 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $34.89 Invoice 1750263 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,990.00 Invoice 1752966 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $5,255.49 Invoice 1752964 11115/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $13,809.15 Refer 36 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS, INC. Cash Payment E 609-49750-205 Computer Hardware/Soft LABEL PRINTER- COMPATIBLE W/ $563.02 REGISTERS - HWS Invoice 56570 10/16/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $56102 Refer 38 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $51,88 Invoice 0220332 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.50 Invoice 0220332 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $280.00 Invoice 0220331 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $7.50 Invoice 0220331 11/15/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $341,88 Refer 37 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $295.13 Invoice 0219542 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 0219542 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $680.00 Invoice 0219541 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $12.00 Invoice 0219541 11/812018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $240.00 Invoice 0219543 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $14.00 Invoice 0219543 11/8/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,246.13 09KI CITY OF MOUND 11/20/1811:49 AM Page 7 Payments $99,457.10 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $99,457.10 Total $99,457.10 2377 Current Period: November 2018 Refer 39 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $160.00 Invoice 89361 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.00 Invoice 89361 11/15/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $464.00 Invoice 88598 11/8/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.40 Invoice 88598 11/8/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $637.40 Refer 40 WINE MERCHANTS ra Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $576.00 Invoice 7209316 11/14/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $488.00 Invoice 7208212 11/7/2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $23.00 Invoice 7209317 11/14/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,087.00 Refer 41�WRS IMPORTS, LLC Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $570.00 Invoice 1974 11/8/2018 Transaction Date 11/19/2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $570.00 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $99,457.10 $99,457.10 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $99,457.10 Total $99,457.10 2377 Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director and Rita Trapp, HKGI Planning Consultant DATE: November 21, 2018 PLANNING CASE NO. 18-17 SUBJECT: Variance — Bluff APPLICANT: Jeff Harrison, Knight Construction, Inc. LOCATION: 6072 Cherrywood Road MEETING DATE: November 27, 2018 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Low Density Residential ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential Summary The applicant has submitted an application for a variance to allow for construction of a 27.3 foot (including porch overhang) x 26 foot detached, accessory structure at 6072 Cherrywood Road. The property is described as Lot 9, Block 9, The Highlands and includes a 16 -foot wide unimproved ROW on the west side and a single family home on the east side. According to Hennepin County data, the existing home was built in 1987. The existing lot of record, totaling 12,546 square feet, is designated as a through lot with improved road frontages on 2 sides including Cherrywood Road (south side) and Hawthorn Road (north side). Driveway access to the property is located on Cherrywood Road (north side). The rear portion of the property qualifies as a bluff, although the bluff is unique in that it does not touch water and is bounded on two sides by improved roadways. City Code does not allow construction of accessory structures and limits site alterations within a bluff, which is why a variance is being requested. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their November 20th meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. There were no persons present at the meeting about the variance application. Gary Knight on behalf of Knight Construction, Inc. was present and explained that the site alteration activities in the project area were undertaken by another contractor and it was unknown at the time that the slope qualified as a bluff. Mr. Knight provided a copy of the engineering plans for the proposed retaining wall. No concerns were identified by the Planning Commission during its discussion of the variance request. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff with a minor correction. 2378 Recommendation Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. Additional Information • The City of Mound, on November 20, 2018, extended the deadline for action on the variance for 60 -additional days as provided by Minnesota Statutes 15.99. • The engineering plans for the retaining walls provided by the applicant at the Planning Commission meeting are on file with the City and will be provided upon request. 2379 RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FOR 6072 CHERRYWOOD ROAD PLANNING CASE NO. 18-17 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jeff Harrison of Knight Construction, Inc., on behalf of property owners Steve and Wendy Madden, has submitted an application for a variance to allow for construction of a 27.3 foot (including porch overhang) x 26 foot detached, accessory structure at 6072 Cherrywood Road; and WHEREAS, the property is described as Lot 9, Block 9, The Highlands and includes a 16 -foot wide unimproved ROW on the west side and a single family home on the east side. According to Hennepin County data, the existing home was built in 1987. The existing lot of record, totaling 12,546 square feet, is designated as a through lot with improved road frontages on 2 sides including Cherrywood Road (south side) and Hawthorn Road (north side). Driveway access to the property is located on Cherrywood Road (north side); and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-1 single-family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, a variance is being requested to allow construction of the proposed detached accessory structure and to undertake related site alteration activities in an area on the property that qualifies as a bluff as defined by City Code Sec. 129-2; and WHEREAS, the bluff regulations are contained in City Code Sec. 129-385. Per code, site alteration and vegetation removal activities are limited in bluff areas and structures are required to have a top of bluff setback; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. 2380 (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the November 20, 2018 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 20, 2018 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the variance as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its November 27, 2018 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and 2381 WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed accessory structure is being constructed in a conforming location for side and front setbacks for both Cherrywood Road and Hawthorn Road. 2. Location of the detached accessory structure in its proposed location allows the property to maintain a usable backyard and outdoor space for the home. 3. While the property qualifies as a bluff, it is bounded on the north and south sides by improved public roads and is physically separated from water. 4. Having an enclosed accessory structure that allows storage of equipment and other personal items is reasonable especially due to seasonal conditions. 5. The detached, accessory structure project includes a retaining wall system which will be engineered for all portions including those that are under 4 feet. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the variance from the bluff regulations in City Code Sec. 129-385 to allow construction of a detached, accessory structure and related site improvements/alterations, including, but not limited to, grading activities, tree removal, retaining walls, and landscaping at 6072 Cherrywood Road, as described in Exhibit A, with the following conditions: All retaining walls shall be required to be engineered and subject to review and approval; also permitting. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action in the event the expansion permit and variance are approved. 4. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighboring properties. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 2382 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 10. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. 11. No materials shall be stockpiled in the bluff area or in the undeveloped ROW. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, the City Council's approval of the request is based on information contained in the record including but not limited to, the applicant's request and submitted information, the Planning Report, and the Planning Commission's review and recommendation. Adopted by the City Council this 27th day of November, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor 2383 Exhibit A 2384 MINUTES - DRAFT NOVEMBER/' l Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, David Goode, David Pelka, Jameson Smieja, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jennifer Peterson and Jake Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Consultant Planner Rita Trapp. Members of the public: Leslie Johnson, Tom Johnson and Gary Knight of Knight Construction, Inc. PC Case No. 18-17 Variance 6072 Cherrywood Road Applicant: Jeff Harrison, Knight Construction Smith presented the request for a variance to allow the construction of a detached garage in the rear of the property. A variance is needed as the garage and retaining wall will be built into the bluff as defined by the City Code. The property is a through lot with access on Cherrywood Road and Hawthorne Road at the top of the slope. Smith noted that there are a handful of criteria required to be present for a slope to be considered a bluff. This slope, while qualifying as a bluff, is unique in that it does not abut water and it also is bordered by two improved roads. The City Code requires a lot of record to have a 10 foot setback from the top of the bluff and it does not allow construction activities to occur in a bluff subject to exceptions including staircases and landings. Smith noted that the intent of shoreland regulations is to protect water quality, protect terrain and move development away from the Lakeshore. Ina developed community such as Mound, variances are sometimes needed. The toe of bluff is located in the middle of the lot. The applicant would like to place the detached garage in a portion of the bluff to allow for some useable rear yard to remain. Smith noted that Staff is recommending that a condition of approval be that the retaining wall is engineered as it is maintaining the slope. Staff noted that there is not a setback from the toe of the bluff so the variance requested is for work within the bluff. Staff referenced the elevation provided in the packet noting that the structure would be 23 by 26 feet in size. It would be consistent with the height requirement that it be no taller than the home. Baker requested clarification about why the Planning Commission is reviewing the request. Smith clarified that site alteration and structures cannot be done in a bluff. 2385 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft November 20, 2018 Smieja requested clarification what is the shoreland area. Smith noted that the shoreland area is 1,000 feet from the ordinary high water level. Bussey asked whether there was concern about water draining down the slope potentially impacting neighbors. Smith stated that it is a concern that will be evaluated as part of the engineering of the retaining wall. Bussey noted that there is an unimproved right of way to the west of the structure. Smith confirmed its existence and noted it affected setback requirements. Bussey clarified about the potential use of the ROW by vehicles as the proposed garage as overhead doors. Smith noted that it cannot be traversed by vehicular traffic because it is currently in a natural state. Velsor noted that a portion of the retaining wall was already constructed and wondered if it was part of the project. Smith responded that the retaining wall is part of the project. When the project started there was misunderstanding about the presence of the bluff and the need for permitting. When the building permit was applied for and more information was solicited, it was determined that a variance was needed for the project. Gary Knight, representing Knight Construction, clarified that they were involved with the garage design and construction and were not involved in starting the retaining wall without a permit. He said that the presence of the bluff was not known at the start of the project. He also noted that the garage will have stone and be designed to be an asset to the neighborhood. Smieja solicited information about the height of the retaining wall. Knight stated generally four feet but up to seven feet in sections. There is drainage planned as part of the retaining wall so water will move through the site. The garage will have gutters as well. Smieja confirmed with Smith that through the permitting process water drainage will be reviewed. Smith also noted that the property owners have the most potential to be impacted because they are at the bottom of the slope. Bussey suggested a change to finding of fact #4 which would remove the word "to." MOTION by Smieja, second by Bussey, to recommend City Council approval of the variance requested for Case 18-17 for the property at 6072 Cherrywood Road with Staff's recommendations and the findings of fact, with an amendment to #4 to remove the word "to" MOTION carried unanimously. PARR TO: Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director and Rita Trapp, HKGI Planning Consultant DATE: November 14, 2018 PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: 18-17 Variance — Bluff Jeff Harrison, Knight Construction, Inc. 6072 Cherrywood Road November 20, 2018 Low Density Residential R-1 Single Family Residential The applicant has submitted an application for a variance to allow for construction of a 27.3 foot (including porch overhang) x 26 foot detached, accessory structure at 6072 Cherrywood Road. The property is described as Lot 9, Block 9, The Highlands and includes a 16 -foot wide unimproved ROW on the west side and a single family home on the east side. According to Hennepin County data, the existing home was built in 1987. The existing lot of record, totaling 12,546 square feet, is designated as a through lot with improved road frontages on 2 sides including Cherrywood Road (south side) and Hawthorn Road (north side), Driveway access to the property is located on Cherrywood Road (north side). City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. 2387 (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer onthe applicant any special privilege that bdenied 6wthis chapter toowners mfother lands, structures or buildings inthe same district nor bematerially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent ofthe zoning ordinance and when the terms m{the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "PracticalDifficulties" isdefined es follows: Practical Difficulties, maused in conjunctionwith ovariance, means that: U> The property owner proposes touse the property inareasonable manner not permitted bythe zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight ofthe landowner is due tocircumstance unique tothepropertyinduding unusual lot size orshape, topography orother circumstances not created 6vthe landowner; and ' UiAThe variance, if granted, iwill not alter the essential character ofthe locality, Economic considerations alone donot constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99,the City of Mound has sixty /� �da s to approve ordeny the land use request unless anextension bexecuted 6«the L, in�rdance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day I" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule. The "'Day 1" was determined to be September 28,2O18for the application. Applicant isadvised that City will beexecuting anextension for 6U-daysasprovided byM.S. 15.99. Neighboring property owners of the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed aletter on November 141h to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved City Departments and affected public agencies for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and, are therefore, not included in this report. See additional comments which are summarized below: Eric Noversten, City Manager -Director of Public Works. Due to steep slope/topography on the property, the retaining wall to be constructed in the vicinity of the new accessory structure needs to be designed by professional engineers to include structural certification and shall be subject to review and approval by the City to include all required permitting. 1. The applicant submitted a building permit for construction of a detached, accessory structure on August 2, 2018. As part of zoning review, it was determined that the topography on the property met the criteria for a bluff as defined by City Code Sec. 129- 2 as follows: Bluff means topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having all of the following characteristics: (1) Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; (2) The slope rises at least 25 feet above the ordinary high-water level of the water body; (3) The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point 25 feet or more above the ordinary high-water level averages 30 percent or greater; and (4) The slope must drain toward the water body. An area with on average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance of 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of a bluff. 2. Information from the applicant is that the structure will not have a driveway access and will be used for storage/workspace for the owners. The location in the rear of the property was selected so as to maintain a backyard and outdoor space on the property and to save trees. 2389 3. Shoreland Regulations The City's shoreland regulation are contained in City Code Section 129-385 and includes provisions for bluff properties related to structures, site alteration/grading, and vegetation alterations. In general, site alteration activities are restricted in bluff areas and structures, subject to certain exceptions, are required to meet a top of bluff setback. Regulations for stairways, lifts and landings for bluff properties are contained in City Code Section 129-385 (d) (2) (c) and allow stairways not exceeding 4 feet in width and landings up to 32 square feet for a property that contains a bluff. As shown on the survey, the "toe of the bluff" cuts through the location of the proposed accessory structure where site alteration and retaining wall activities have been started. The "top of bluff" is located off the premises. Variance approval is required for the proposed garage and site alteration activities as portions of the project are located in bluff conditions, as defined by the City Code. 4. Per code, accessory buildings cannot exceed total gross floor area of 3,000 or 15 percent of the total lot area, whichever is less. Each individual building shall not exceed 1,200 square feet of gross floor area. Staff's setback assignment for the accessory structure are 10 feet on the west side (undeveloped ROW over 15 feet) and 4 feet on the east side. The submitted proposal is consistent with these regulations and meets the required setbacks for an accessory structure located behind the house. 5. Pitched roofs are measured from average grade of the building line (closest point) to the mid -point of the highest peak and measured at the building line(s) facing the street. As the property is a through lot, the building lines along the north and south elevations are used to determine building height for the house and proposed detached accessory structure. Using information from applicant, the submitted survey and building plans and conducting a field evaluation, Staff has estimated the building height of the house to be approximately 20 feet, 7 inches and the proposed garage to be approximately 15 feet, 10 inches. 6. Eaves are allowed to encroach 2 feet into setback areas. Gutters are exempt. The proposal meets this requirement. 7. The MCWD is the regulatory authority for wetlands, floodplain, and erosion control, also others. Applicant is advised to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed remodel/addition project. Future building permit release will be conditioned upon the applicant providing receipt of the MCWD permit(s) issuance, as applicable, and or receipt of written confirmation from the MCWD that no permit(s) is needed for the project. 2390 8. The applicant has recently been issued building permits for onen-''�---�psand detached on -grade detached deck and boardwalk for the house inaddition maintenance permit to reside the house. 9. The proposed project includes construction ofaproposed retaining wall around the west, north and east sides ofthe proposed structure. The site alteration activities and retaining wall improvements are included as part of the variance request. The applicant, onNovember 25m,confirmed with Staff that the retaining xxa{|(s\w/U|be engineered. '' 10.The property includes topographythat qualifies esebluff according 1mthe code. These regulations are applicable to shoreland properties and in most cases, are lakefront properties where topography slopes down and drains to the lake. In this case, the property isbounded onJsides byimproved roads and therefore isphysically separated from the lake. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend [itv[bund/approval ofthe vahancehoa//ovvconstruction mfadetached, accessory dvveUing'and related site improvements, including but not limited to, grading, retaining walls, and landscaping in a bluff and therefore do not meet the required 10 -foot setback from top of bluff, subject to the following list of minimum conditions: 1, All retaining walls shall be required tobgengineered andsubjeottorevievxand approval; also permitting. 2. Applicant shall be responsiblefor payment ofall costs associated with the land use request. Nofuture approval ofany development plans and/or build - building permits isir�ded aspart ofthis action /nthe event the expansion permit and varianceane approved. 4. Applicant shall submit all required information upon submittal of the building permit. ~ 5. Applicant shall ensure that runoff from the roof does not drain on to neighboring properties. - - Gi Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal nfall required information prior to building permit issuance. 7. The applicant shall beresponsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant i»advised that the resolution will not bereleased for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will beissued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees tmbetaken out ofthe escrow. g. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the applicable permits that may beneeded toundertake the proposed project. Evidence from the K0CWDin the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. 10. All new construction shall take place at or above the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) or 3 feet above a wetland. 11. No materials shall be stockpiled in the bluff area or in the undeveloped ROW. In recommending Staff approval of the requested variance, the following findings of fact are 1. The proposed accessory structure bbeing constructed inaconforming location for side and front setbacks for both CherryxvoodRoad and Hawthorn Road. 2. Location of the detached accessory structure in its proposed location allows the property tomaintain ausable backyard and outdoor space fprthehome. 3. While the property qualifies as a bluff, it is bounded on the north and south sides by improved public roads and isphysically separated from water. 4. Having an enclosed accessory structure 10that allows storage of equipment and other personal items is reasonable especially due to seasonal conditions. 5. The detached, accessory structure project indudesaretainingwaUsystennvvh/chvvi|/be engineered for all portions including those that are under 4feet, CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting with tentative dates of Tuesday, November 27,2O18et7prnorTuesday, December I1,2Ol8at7pnn. Subject Parcel M Jurisdictional Boundary rZJ 100 Year Floodplain Date: 11/12/2018 Source: City of Mound & Hennepin County Assessor 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet 2393 t 1 701 ,. a 1� rAdk) 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 PAID VARIANCE SEP 2 7 2018 APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND -j 6p Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. 4t> VSZ, , CC Planning Commission Date. fn g (2— Case No. City Council Date N a g: a -- Please type or print legibly SUBJECT Address (0 -2 . .. . .... -c) 1, PROPERTY Lot LEGAL Block DESC. Subdivision 41 Al --5 PID # Zoning: R1 RIA R2 R3 B1 82 B3 (Circle one) PROPERTY Name'�5V C),'n Email w WA OWNER ? P, � d J Address (0 0 t CICA I Phone Home We* Fax APPLICANT Name ,Air t ti,,s %&<-\r te A Email (IF OTHER Address k Ilk THAN I k' OWNER) Phone Home 9 �; -P(- (L'� �/Work 4',11 -cl M -19 ('Y`(Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes No ()0. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): I � 111,4 4 1,4414 t I I S `9 "P &--C R 'r— A -L'? -P Z-- C' Variance Information (1/14/2016) Page 4 of 6 2394 In --, ( /—,5;b —ea Case No. — 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes X) No ( ). If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, of area, etc.): SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED VARIANCE (or existing} Front Yard: N. W :3 c) ft, ft. ft, Side Yard: (N S EQ,) ft. ft. ft. Side Yard: N SAO W) ft. ft. ft. Rear Yard: S E W) 6 ft. ft. Lakeside,;',(NSEW) ft. ft. ft. (N S E W) ft. ft. ft, Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft sq ft so ft Hardcover: F sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes X), No ( ). if no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? too narrow topography ( )soil )too small ( )drainage ( ) existing situation )too shallow ( )shape ( ) other: specify ,17 Please describe: (-J I r4 V/ Variance Information (1/14/2016) Page 5 of 6 2395 Case No. 19-fl— E3. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), Nod}.. --If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes No If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ().), No If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: 111' I certify that all of the aboya-s-tatements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewit-4-retrue accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I conset to the e0try in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of nd e pose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be requir law. 01 Owner's Signature Dateq_2_(P11 Applicant's Signature Date 7, Variance Information (1/14/2016) Page 6 of 6 2396 From: Gary Knight[mailto:gary@knightremodeling.comj Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 11:39 AM To: Jeff Harrison <jeff@knightremode iing.com>; Steve Madden <maddensteve99@yahoo.com>; Wendy Mcmillen <wmcmadden@yahoo.com> Cc: Sarah Smith <sarahsmith@cityofmound.com> Subject: RE: 6072 Cherrywood Road - variance Hi Sarah, In following up with the request below. Steve and Wendy Madden are facing an hardship situation with a toe of a bluff (unbeknownst to them) on their property and dealing with an odd shaped lot. The reasoning for not wanting to move the garage closer to the house. ® Move trees would need to be removed 6 Lack of usable remaining yard space ® Inability to maneuver items in and out of garage space ® Drainage issues. By building an engineered retaining wall better drainage will be achieved. ® Usage of property is a big issue Please let us know if there's anything else you need from us. Respectfully, Gary Knight Gary Knight, Certified Remodeler Knight Construction Design, Inc. T:952-361-4949 C: 612-919-7983 www.knightremodeling.com 2397 ..- 6u!tiamtl..-- - B1 ,g, h f I � ( iO.�,W O®OtYkA Ck®Z O N H o Pty y�g�yd�b L �p >�i iie 2398 a sa aA 2 � ills, P ,.::Y PABrn SbE3'XTa h F a� o � >sxars ..- 6u!tiamtl..-- - B1 ,g, h f I � ( iO.�,W O®OtYkA Ck®Z O N H o Pty y�g�yd�b L �p >�i iie 2398 a sa P ,.::Y PABrn SbE3'XTa ..- 6u!tiamtl..-- - B1 ,g, h f I � ( iO.�,W O®OtYkA Ck®Z O N H o Pty y�g�yd�b L �p >�i iie 2398 T gD PKOJEG'-mE KNIGHT-MAPOEN Dan J. Heid-Planning&Derignuc D-9-ffl.q.H &O-Sfty Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Consulting City Planners DATE: November 21, 2018 MEETING: November 27, 2018 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 18-15 Expansion Permit for 3020 Highland Boulevard (PID 23-117-24-41-0013) Request Summary The applicant/property owner, The Leslie Johnson Revocable Trust, has submitted an application for an expansion permit for a second -floor addition onto the existing home at 3020 Highland Boulevard. The 12,529 square foot lakeshore lot of record contains a single-family home, a detached garage, and a shed. The applicant is proposing adding a second -floor addition to the non -lake facing rear of the house, along with an interior remodel. An expansion permit is required as the existing home, including chimney, is non -conforming to the south side lot line. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their November 20, 2018 meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. No concerns were raised by those in attendance at the meeting. The Planning Commission expressed no concerns about the project and unanimously recommended approval of the expansion permit with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff. Recommendation Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. Additional Information • Condition No. 1 in the Planning Commission's recommendation included in the resolution was modified to change "if" to "unless" to correct the intent of the condition. The changes are shown in strike-out/underlined form. Members are advised that the final version will not include the strike-out/underlined text. • The City of Mound, on November 20, 2018, extended the deadline for action on the variance for 60 -additional days as provided by Minnesota Statutes 15.99. 2400 RESOLUTION NO. 18 - RESOLUTION APPROVING AN EXPANSION PERMIT FOR 3020 HIGHLAND BOULEVARD PLANNING CASE NO. 18-15 PID NO. 23-117-24-41-0013 WHEREAS, the applicants and property owner (Owner), The Leslie Johnson Revocable Trust, has submitted an application for an expansion permit; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-1 single-family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 12,529 square foot property includes an existing home, a detached garage, and a detached shed; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking to add a second -story addition to the non -Lakeshore side of the home; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an expansion permit to allow the existing south side yard setback of 9.5 feet and chimney setback of 7.6 feet be extended vertically for the second floor addition; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting an expansion permit which is provided below: (1) The proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. Function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. Absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. ; and c. Adequacy of off-street parking. (2) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) The expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) The expansion requested is the minimum needed. 2401 WHEREAS, details regarding the requested expansion permit for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the November 20, 2018 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the expansion permit was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its November 20, 2018 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the expansion permit as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the expansion permit request at its November 27, 2018 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the applications were made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the expansion permit, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The desire for a two-story home is reasonable for a residential property. 4. The south side yard setback of 9.5 feet is an existing condition that will be maintained as the building is vertically expanded with a second floor addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the expansion permit for the property at 3020 Highland Boulevard, as described in Exhibit A, with the following conditions: The proposed project cannot exceed current hardcover amount4 unless lawful nonconforming. Hardcover will be verified as part of building permit. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 2402 5. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 6. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 8. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 9. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, the City Council's approval of the request is based on information contained in the record including but not limited to, the applicant's request and submitted information, the Staff Report, and the Planning Commission's review and recommendation. Adopted by the City Council this 27th of November, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor 2403 MINUTES - DRAFT Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, David Goode, David Pelka, Jameson Smieja, and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jennifer Peterson and Jake Saystrom. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith and Consultant Planner Rita Trapp. Members of the public: Leslie Johnson, Tom Johnson and Gary Knight of Knight Construction, Inc. BOARD OF APPEALS PC Case No. 18-15 Expansion Permit 3020 Highland Boulevard Applicant: The Leslie Johnson Revocable Trust Consultant Trapp presented the Planning Report and provided an overview of the Expansion Permit request. The project is located at 3020 Highland Boulevard and the proposal includes a house remodel/upper floor addition to be constructed on the non -facing rear of the house. An expansion permit is required as the existing house is nonconforming on the south setback. Trapp noted that as a lot of record the property is allowed a reduced side yard setback of six feet on one side while the other side is required to be ten feet. The designation of the six and ten foot setbacks occurred when there was a remodel on the north side of the home that extended into the ten foot setback area. While the south side yard setback is required to be 10 feet, the home was built only 9.5 feet from the south lot line. In addition, Trapp noted that there is a chimney located only 7.6 feet from the lot line, which is further than the two foot allowable encroachment by City Code. Trapp stated that the application had been routed to Staff, consultants and other agencies as is customary and no concerns were raised. Staff is recommending approval of the request with standard conditions. Bussey inquired about building code requirements for the fireplace as he saw in the elevations that the chimney extends to the second floor though there is no fireplace. It was confirmed that the building code requires the chimney to be extended above the height of the roof line. Commissioner Smieja clarified that the allowable encroachment for the chimney is from the ten foot setback line not the building line. 2404 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft November 20, 2018 MOTION by Goode, second by Smieja, to recommend approval of the expansion permit request for 3020 Highland Boulevard with the findings of fact and conditions presented by Staff. MOTION carried unanimously. 2405 TO: Planning Commission FROM; Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Planning Consultants Sarah Smith, dn b{�mmunOe��o�ent�ir '^^^~ ' DATE: ' Nmvemnber14,2O18 PLANNING CASE NO, 10-15(Expansion Perrn|H SUBJECT: ' Expansion Permit APPLICAy4T, The Leslie Johnson Revocable Trust (Ovvner) LOCATION: 3O2OHighland Boulevard /P|�23-117-24-41-0013)' ' �M�ET|NG D�E: November20, 201Q COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, Low Density Residential ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential The applicant/property owner, The Leslie Johnson Revocable Trust, has submitted an application for an expansion permit for second -floor addition onto the existing home at 3020 Highland Boulevard. The 1L529square focdhkeshmre(otofrucordcmnta/nsa single-familyhone,adetachedgarage,andashed'/tis|mcatedxith|ntheHigh/andNeiQhborh°ud' The applicant is proposing adding a second -floor addition to the non -lake facing rear of the hous e 'a|ongvithaninterimrrenmdciAnmxpansionpemitis required -sthe existing home /snon- conforming tothesouthsidelotUne. City Code Section 129-40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be granted to provide relief to the landowner where the application of the City {ode imposes practical difficulties. /n de1ern�in/ngm�)etherpract�a/ difficulties exist, /`v�the City Council shall evaluate the following criteria: (I)the proposed expansion bareasonable use ufthe m.function and aesthetics mfthe expansion. b. absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. (2) exceptionalorextraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect oralter the essential character ofthe (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. Abutting property owners per Hennepin County tax records, were sent written notice un November 14, 2018 to inform them of the expansion permit request and that the application was included on the November 20, 2018 Planning Commission meeting agenda for review. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City ofMound has sixty (6O) days to approve nrdeny the land use request unless anextension iaexecuted bythe Cityinaccordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 545.1Ssets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be September 26, 2018. The City will be executing a 60 -day extension as provided by M.S. .15.99. The 12,5J9square foot property has anexisting home, that consists ofaone-story living area and a half -finished basement. The home was constructed in 1971. The applicant is proposing to add asecond story tothe non -lakeside half ofthe house. Asshown onthe attached survey, the existing home's south side yard has asetback uf9.G which [3less than the required 1O.Ofeet for the R-1Zoning District; the side yard also has an existing chimney that is7.Gfeet from the lot line. Percode,mechanical equipment can encroach 2feet into setbacks. A0expansion permit iyneeded toallow for the vertical expansion ofthis side yard setback for the house remodel/upper floor addition project. it should benoted that there is side yard setback relief for R,2lots ofrecord that are narrower than certain widths. As this property qualifies, it can have one side yard setback at 6 feet while the other setback continues tobe1Ofeet. For this property the assignment ofthese setbacks took place in2O0Iaspart ufanentryway expansion and remodel project. Uuringthat9rocess, it was shown on a site plan submitted with the application that a six-foot side yard would be maintained on the north side yard while the south side setback would remain at 10 feet. As the home is built only 9.5 feet from the south property line, the south side yard has a non- conforming setback requiring an expansion permit for the second floor expansion; also the existing chimney is located 7.6 feet from the south property line is being extended with the proposed project. REVIEW Copies ofthe request and supporting materials were forwarded toall [itvdepartments for revieVvand comrnent. ' Llipr�*O n Staffs evaluation isthat the proposed upper floor addition bwithin the allowed maximum building height of 35 feet. This will be verified at the time of the building permit. Hardcover isshown at4O.9percent onthe submitted survey from the applicant but has not been field verified. There isnoadditional hardcover proposed aspart ofthis application a5the addition is going over the existing footprint, The applicant is advised that as a lot of record, the parcel allows for a maximum of 40% hardcover, which is 5,011 square feet. Any changes to hardcover will be verified at time of the building permit. The applicant isalso showing anextension ofthe existing chimney, which is7.Gfeet from the south side lot line, Chimneys not extending more than 2 feet into setbacks are permitted encroachments. » The applicant's surveyor confirmed that the topography on the subject lot does not qualify as bluff as defined by the City Code. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approval of expansion permit for the upper floor/rem ode ling project for this site auhUerLtothe following 1. The proposed project cannot exceed current hardcover amount if lawful nonconforming. Hardcover will be verified as part of building permit, 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use 3. @ofuture approval nfany development plans and/or k �buildingper�s isincluded aspart of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. G. Applicant shall beresponsible for procurement ofany and/or all local orpublic agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal ofall required information prior tp building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out ofthe escrow. @. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related towetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may beneeded toundertake the proposed project. Evidence from the M[VVD in the form of permit orwaiver must be provided before release of any future building permit, In recommending Staff approval ofthe expansion permit, Lthe following findings offact are The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met, 2. Improvements tothe residential use ofthis property are inkeeping with how bb zoned and guided inthe comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The desire for a two-story home is reasonable for a residential property. 4. The south side yard setback ofg.5feet isanexisting condition that will be maintained as the building is vertically expanded with a second floor addition, CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, itwill baforwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting with tentative dates of Tuesday, November 27,2OI8at7prnmrTuesday, December 11,ZOlQat7pnm. Subject Parcel M Jurisdictional Boundary 100 Year Floodplain AX& C3 Date: 11/12/2018 Source: City of Mound & Hennepin County Assessor 0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet 2410 (A EXPANSION PERMIT _wU;4W_ APPLICATION 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 553 Phone 952-4720600 FAX 952.472.0620 Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. SQA Case No. SUBJECT I Address -3 6) -Z- 0 I LEGAL Lot Block CSC. SubdivisionL6*-f- PID # Z -T I Zoning: 1A R2 R3 81 B2 B3 (Clyde one) PROPERTY I Namei ori Email OWNER Address_3o4o (i,. I Phone Home i - �-Z Fax APPLICANT Name Email (IF OTHER THAN Address OWNER) Phone Home Work- Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (,N. If Yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions, 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): 7-04 C41'%ft .. dAA Expansion Permit Information (1119/2018) Page 4 of 6 2411 Case No. 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district In which it is located including the expansion permit request. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION (or wdsting) Front Yard: (NSEW) r57 _ft. _Z!�!. 1/ ft. —0 Side Yard: (NSEW) ft. ft, Side Yard: (NSEW) _ft. 7 ft. Rear Yard, (NSEW) ft. Lakeside: (NSEW) ft, _/v,Z ft. — --- ---- : (N S E W) ft. StreetFrontage: Lot Size: Hardcover 4-07�-- sq ft 3SAe <—V— sq ft ,r—sq ft ft. ft. -=!Tsq ft ---!!�—sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes No If no, specify each non -conformity: 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circurnstan s over which the owner of the prop r sin enactment of this chapter have no control? Please ce h S e ty since check all that apply, V4 too narrow ( )topography soil ) too small ( ) drainage existing situation )too shallow ( )shape )other. specify Please describe: 4e -off Expansion Permit Information (1119/2018) Page 5 of 6 2412 ,U Case No, 6. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes No If yes, explain: 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other Person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (J4 If Yes, explain, Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes No (N. If list some no, 0 ch are similarly affected? other r e properties rtie which FM I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the Premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Applicanift Signature Expansion Permit InfbrmaVon (1/19/2018) Page 6 of 6 2413 r Q ,j --__SNwn --------- y F'5V ....95 9S6 mow. tt Lo N f e A C' ( 3� 0 r Li 0 n� i� r i \ Z'OL4iA \ & lLb 241a u F i; HIGHLAND DL 9 Z 0 c nV gift, $HK fig iWt;v*.v..v !glop 25 .93! i11,11111f[M U11 i; HIGHLAND DL 9 ------------- 0 ------------- T� 000000 0000000 ADDITION & REMODELING FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE 3 30 020 HIGHLAND BLVD. M MOLTN OUD, MN 2416 �i m El rlm ADDITION & REMODELING FOR, JOHNSON RESIDENCE 3024 HIGHLAND BLVD. MOUND, MN 2418 E i22VIdDlELINp[ A IT 4 E+ S ENCS NT3 SLVA. 2419 Eggs [T ------------- 2-I WOR I EX uOR ------------- Ffi 26 x8 x no 7' 7� it -4 II Ip VIII Rn" rn ADDITION & REMODELING FOR 0 3020 HIGHLAND BLVD. MOUND, MN 2420 JOHNSON RESIDENCE 2-I WOR I EX uOR Ffi 26 x8 x no 7' 7� it -4 II Ip VIII Rn" rn ix 0 L 0?1 x ADDITION & REMODELING FOR 0 3020 HIGHLAND BLVD. MOUND, MN 2420 JOHNSON RESIDENCE Ffi 26 x8 x 7' 7� x ADDITION & REMODELING FOR 0 3020 HIGHLAND BLVD. MOUND, MN 2420 JOHNSON RESIDENCE W ~ /(/ \;| RE{ ¥ } \ ;1C 7 $ A § \ | Z n - CA ) f � 2 O § Z \ Mgt � W ~ /(/ \;| / & } \ \ / A § \ | , ) f / § 2 § % / Mgt R«a \§§ § ni , ?333333?53333§ 2 g ! [i} � |»2 § | \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ !. m m 4 0 Z m rn 0 Z ADDITION & REMODELING FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE 3020 HIGHLAND BLVD. MOUND, MN 2422 ADDITION & REMODELING FOR JOHNSON RESIDENCE 3020 HIGHLAND BLVD. MOUND, MN 2423 MOUND DOCKS AND COMMONS COMMISSION MINUTES September 20, 2018 The Mound Docks and Commons Commission met on Thursday, September 20, 2018, at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Present: Chair Derrick Hentz, Vice Chair Susan Gardner, Commissioners Jim Funk, Heidi Peterson, Linda Muller and Council Representative Kelli Gillispie Others Present: Catherine Pausche, Director of Finance and Administration and Kevin Kelly, Administrative Services Coordinator, Michelle Olson, Chris Valerius, Kirby Ellingson, Tom Frenette, David Mangen, Scott Beckman and Linda Jacobson. Chair Derrick Hentz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. 1. Approval of Agenda. MOTION by Gardner, seconded by Funk, to approve the agenda. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 2. Approval of Meeting Minutes — March 15, 2018. MOTION, by Muller, seconded by Gardner, to approve the minutes from the March 15, 2018 DCC meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 3. Comments and Suggestions from Citizens Present: No one from the public came forward. 4. Dock Commission Term. Pausche stated that Heidi Peterson has stepped forward to stay on for another three-year term. 5. Devon Commons Rip Rap Update Kelly said the rain during this week did delay the start of the project which should start on Monday, September 24. Kelly noted he did offer the rip rap cost share deal to the two property owners on Island View Drive who did not take the original offer. Kelly stated he heard back from one of the two who declined the offer and did not hear back from the second resident. Peterson asked if the third property owner was still interested in the cost share and Kelly stated the property owner took the cost share offer and would like to go forward with the project. 6. Lake Access Opportunities Pausche stated Dock Administration is exploring options to providing more opportunities for residents to use the lake from city controlled property while managing the number of BSU's (Boat Storage Units) in the Dock Program allowed by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (LMCD). Pausche said the Dock program has previously proposed adding a multiple slip at the City owned property at Idlewood Road which is off of Highland Blvd. Pausche stated that the Idlewood location did hold two docks previously and also has a lift station on-site. The access to the docks was a stairway which was in disrepair and the dock location was blocked for a time ezyzs DCC Minutes — September 20, 2018 with the replacement of the lift station a few years ago. Pausche said these factors caused the dock location to be suspended. Pausche said Dock Administration presented a cost analysis for installing a multiple slip at Idlewood at a previous DCC meeting and the cost was estimated at $20,000.00 - $25,000.00 for the build out of a stairway and the purchase of a four -slip multiple. Pausche also mentioned the DCC discussed Ridgewood Park as a good location for a multiple slip site, but added that the dock license holders at Ridgewood were against the idea. Pausche noted that the dock holders made improvements to the docks at that time, but the conditions continue to be monitored. Pausche stated another avenue to get more lake opportunities is through installing canoe racks on public shoreline. Pausche added that Three Rivers Park District and the cities of Tonka Bay and Wayzata do have canoe racks installed for resident use which have been easy to manage. Pausche added the Dock Program could pilot the installation of canoe racks at a park such as Carlson or Centerview to gauge interest. Pausche mentioned the City redesigned Carlson Park to help manage stormwater and the redesign included a canoe/kayak launch at the shoreline. Funk said there are canoe racks at Medicine Lake that are affordable and with little problem with theft. Pausche said the other cities were charging $50.00 a season and she would think the City could charge a similar amount. Pausche added there are dock license holders who are using non -motorized watercraft to hold their docks and those individuals could switch to a canoe rack at a reduced cost and open up their dock site for another resident. Gardner asked if a canoe rack would have any effect on BSU counts. Kelly said canoes aren't counted against the BSU limits if they are stored off of the water. Muller asked if there would be traffic and parking concerns at Carlson Park if there are more users of the shoreline at the park. Funk said parking is only an issue on the busiest days of the year and noted there are few times when he can't park on the street in front of Carlson Park. Peterson asked about Surfside being a good candidate for a canoe rack. Pausche mentioned that Surfside Park is in the discussion phase of a major redesign and canoe racks could be considered for Surfside if they fit into the planning and design. Funk said if the costs are low enough the dock program should go ahead with the canoe rack pilot program. Gillespie asked about budgeting for the proposed canoe racks. Pausche said the 2019 budget process is on-going with $60,000.00 presently ear -marked in the Dock Fund for infrastructure programs for 2019. Pausche added that canoe racks are relatively inexpensive. MOTION, by Nentz, seconded by Funk, to support a pilot program for the proposed installation of canoe/kayak racks which staff will investigate and bring forward a proposal at the November DCC meeting. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 2425 DCC Minutes — September 20, 2018 Pausche stated the proposed Idlewood slip cost estimates are approximately $22,000.00- $25,000.00 for stairs to the shore and a slip which would moor four watercraft. Hentz asked about mooring more than four watercraft and Kelly stated dock administration met with the LMCD to discuss a potential slip at Idlewood and that LMCD staff felt the setbacks at the location can only accommodate a four slip multiple. Peterson asked what kind of material would be used for the stairway. Pausche stated it would be treated lumber or similar product. Peterson recommended concrete or stone as those materials don't deteriorate as quickly as other products. Pausche said Dock Administration would look into other materials and other costs when proposing the Idlewood slip. Peterson asked about adding other multiple locations. Pausche said Ridgewood was discussed and she added that multiple slips are easier for the City to manage. Pausche said the dock holders in Ridgewood weren't in favor of converting to a multiple slip. Kelly said one of the other location ideas for a multiple slip was the Avocet Lane street end on Jennings Cove but noted there is limited parking along Avocet Lane. Pausche said the Dock Program will be making a significant investment in the proposed Idlewood location and if approved could require a cost share from the users of the proposed multiple slip. Gillespie asked how the stairs were paid for in the past and stated the Dock program should be consistent with past precedents. Peterson said the stairs built in Woodland Point was a cost share by the users which she said was $50.00 for 5 years. Kelly said those stairs were built in 2001. Kelly added that the cost share for the stairway on Pebble Beach in 2017 was based on a similar percentage of the cost of the project which was paid in 2001. Kelly added that the license holder at that location will pay an $100.00 cost share for a period of 5 years. Pausche said the city has to consider liability concerns when taking on a project like a stairway. Pausche said the LMCD allows the City to manage the BSU numbers of the dock program. Pausche added that the LMCD is generally more restrictive than the City when regulating BSU's on private shoreline. Pausche noted there is currently only one dock license holder who moors five watercraft at their dock location. Pausche said the LMCD requires 50 feet of shoreline per BSU allowed at a location and five watercraft at one location would require the owner to apply for a multiple slip license from the LMCD. Pausche added that there are three additional abutters who moor four watercraft and the BSU count is still manageable. Pausche added if the City allotment of 590 BSU's was reached the average number of boats per license holder would be 1.5 BSU's. Pausche stated we need to start the conversation on limiting the guaranteed number of BSU's to maintain the viability of the program. Funk stated that limiting the number of BSU's to four per dock location is a no-brainer. ►zP.Iy DCC Minutes — September 20, 2018 Muller added that there will need to be communication to license holders to help define and relay these changes to license holders. Pausche agreed and said public communication on any proposed changes to the Dock Program will be sent out along with license applications, as was done at the end of 2017. Gillespie asked if those license holders who are over the proposed BSU limits need to grandfathered in and the BSU count should be considered a non -conforming use. Pausche said the city attorney would need to weigh in on this decision. Kelly stated another factor to consider is there are 17 Abutters who did not have any BSU's at their location. Kelly added that one of these 17 locations moored five BSU's in 2017. Kelly said there are 84 locations which have two BSU's and 19 others which moor three watercraft. Gardner agreed that license holders existing BSU's should be grandfathered in. Pausche agreed with Gardner and suggested new license holders are told that they are only guaranteed one BSU per non -abutting location and two BSU's for abutting locations. Peterson said if each of the abutters have two each then abutters would use 344 BSU's Pausche said the anticipation is that not all of the abutters are going to moor multiple watercraft as now there are 68 abutters that moor only one. Peterson would wonder how unused BSU's would be allocated if a limit is placed. Gillespie asked about the amount of Dock Use Area of the abutter which has five BSU's. Kelly responded that the Dock Use Area for their location is 30 feet but noted their private abuts a much longer length of commons. Gillespie said if she moored five watercraft on her private shoreline she would be immediately flagged by the LMCD. Kelly said that one way to look at the number of BSU's for abutters would be to determine the numbers by the DUA. If the DUA is around 30 feet than if may make sense to limit BSU's to reflect that limited amount of space. Hentz stated that prior to 1970 the LMCD allowed private shoreline uses which it doesn't currently allow for new dock locations regarding BSU counts. Pausche noted that the LMCD only looks at private shoreline for regulation and allows Mound to regulate the Dock program from a whole. Pausche also noted that there are a number of private shoreline locations which are only 40 feet in Mound which the LMCD would only allow 2 BSUs. Hentz asked the meeting attendees if they are interested in addressing the sub topic around BSU's. 2427 DCC Minutes — September 20, 2018 Linda Jacobsen, 4660 Island View Drive, asked if the license holders who hold four or five boats own all of those boats. Hentz said that the Dock program has been checking DNR registrations and cleaning up loopholes which allowed non-residents to moor on the commons. 7. Dock Use Analysis Kelly said Dock Administration wanted to give the Dock Commission the hard numbers of the amount and variety of structures which are on the commons. Pausche said there are some complaints regarding winter storage of dock materials and dock structures are getting more complex. She added that the research shows there are a limited number of dock covers on non -abutter dock locations and there is a lack of a commons wide procedure to deal with dock covers and lift canopies. Pausche said the Dock Program is attempting to determine what are reasonable guidelines, procedures and/or code language to regulate these structures. Pausche said one idea would be for non -abutters to be restricted to straight docks and off shore storage of lifts and other non -dock materials. Funk asked about the lift and new structure moratorium and if non -abutters were seeking out lifts this year. Kelly said there have been a few calls from people who are looking for a lift and canopy and did ask about when the moratorium will be lifted. Kelly said he received an email right before the meeting today from a non -abutter with a 30 feet DUA. Kelly said the non -abutter was complaining about the lack of storage space for his dock material. Kelly said this individual has an open dock design with a dock cover and a boat and two Jet Ski lifts. Kelly said the license holder complained about a fallen tree near his DUA which is not being removed from the commons. Peterson asked if non -abutters have always had the opportunity to store material on the shoreline and not off lake storage. Gardner said they have been allowed to store on the shoreline as long as access along the shore was not blocked. Pausche noted that some commons areas are deeper than others. Kelly said a new license holder in Dreamwood in 2017 did need to reposition their dock materials as their items were stacked in a way which didn't allow access along the shoreline. Pausche noted there is an area of Brighton Commons where there have been complaints about lifts and docks storage being an eyesore. Muller said she has mixed opinions about the storage question. Muller said she can see it from both sides as storage in the winter can be an eyesore but it is difficult for dock holders to remove items from the shore for storage. Peterson said the Woodland Point Settlement Agreement allows for access to the shoreline and along the commons. MKI DCC Minutes — September 20, 2018 Pausche said there are many areas in the City where abutting property owners can store/improve on Right of Ways (ROW) within reason if the abutter also maintains the ROW. Muller said that the City will need to reinforce the rules around storage and general rules of the dock program with current and new license holders. Hentz asked those present to come forward to discuss this area. Christine Valerius, 5388 Tonkawood Road, stated she is an abutter on Waterbank Commons said a neighboring site stored dock materials in her area which caused problems for the surrounding dock locations. Scott Beckman, 2628 Tyrone Lane, shares a dock with a non -abutter who has a dock cover which makes it difficult for him to access his boat. Beckman says it is a safety issue and noted he is on the wait list so he can ultimately move to his own site. David Mangen, 5975 Ridgewood Road, said he is an abutter at Highland End. Mangen asked about storage to focus on sightlines and view and traversability. Mangen said the growth along the shore at Highland makes traversability difficult. Kelly said Public Works has created a natural buffer to stabilize the shoreline and Pausche added this is done to meet Watershed District requirements. Kirby Ellingson, 2146 Forest Lane, a non -abutter on Canary Lane/Jennings Cove, asked about the moratorium on lifts and asked if it is tabled at this time. Pausche stated the next few meetings over the winter will be used to move the discussion along to making decisions about lifts and canopies. Ellingson said he would like to put in a lift and add a fishing boat at his location. Gillespie commented that the simplest way to streamline the storage process is if you have a lift you should store the lift on your private property. Gillespie said that some dock removal companies will store lifts at their facility. Peterson asked if Gillespie was speaking to all dock materials or just lifts. Gillespie said she was referring to lifts. A discussion regarding dock covers/boat houses and storage ensued. It was agreed that this is a good time to address these issues as non -abutters using lifts isn't too prevalent at this time. Christine Valerius, 5488 Tonkawood Lane, said the rules for non -abutters should be different as far as storage on the commons. Michelle Olson, 2060 Waterside Lane, an abutter on Waterside Lane, said there is a big difference between abutters and non -abutters because we pay Lakeshore taxes because of the view. Olson said she takes care of the commons and noted non -abutters don't pay the taxes abutters pay. 2429 DCC Minutes — September 20, 2018 Peterson said she did a comparison of taxes between those properties abutting the commons and those on private lakeshore and said there is a difference in taxes between the two types of properties. Olson said she has information which shows there isn't a difference in tax rates between private and abutter commons lakeshore property. Jacobson said she has also done a study on property taxes and shows that tax rates are based on the value of the property. Jacobson said variables such as quality of the home have a bearing on the total value of the property which affects taxes. 8. 2019 Dock Program Budget Pausche said the major change in the budget as it relates to docks was to transfer the dock special revenue funds related to the Lost Lake slips to a special revenue fund for the Harbor District. Pausche said special revenue funds are utilized when revenues are to be used for a specific purpose such as the dock program. Pausche said an interfund loan was created to help pay off the bonds for the Lost Lake dredge/slips because the recession caused redevelopment to stall in the Harbor District. Pausche added the City had to levy tax payers to pay the bonds due to the lack of tax increment revenue from development. Pausche said the Lost Lake Slips have generated revenue which will be used to pay off the bonds and end the levy for now. Pausche said the Dock Fund will go forward with the revenue generated from Dock Program sources. Pausche added that Lost Lake Slips revenue going forward will be dedicated to current and future maintenance of the infrastructure of the Harbor District amenities and for the ultimate re -dredge of the channel and harbor. Gillespie wanted to know the amount of administrative costs in administering the Lost Lake slips. Pausche said the Dock Program pays $35,000 for administrative, but she has not though how much is needed to support the Lost Lake slips alone. Gillespie said the fund budgets are pretty tight and believes there should be license fee increases to have revenue for future capital improvements. Peterson asked about the proposed Harbor District townhomes and would the new harbor district slips be offered to the new townhome owners. Gillespie said the new residents will have first priority to get a slip which is the same system as the Villa townhome owners. Pausche said there are no immediate infrastructure needs of the Dock program after 2018 other than the proposed Idlewood multiple slip. Pausche said the Dock Program will need to assess infrastructure needs in 2019. Pausche said dock fees haven't been changed in a while and possibly the fee structure needs to be reevaluated to ensure the dock program is incentivizing the preferred uses if the BSU count becomes a concern. Pausche said an example includes shares for $175.00 and additional watercraft at $100 when the regular dock license is $325.00. Gardner asked how many times Mike Miller, the Dock Inspector, made his rounds. Kelly said he completed five rounds due to the later June 15th start and other scheduling conflicts. Kelly 2430 DCC Minutes — September 20, 2018 added that he felt the five rounds were sufficient. Kelly noted there were two non -abutter docks which didn't moor a watercraft this season. David Mangen, 5975 Ridgewood Road, asked what the expected life cycle of dock program infrastructure and where is it itemized in the budget. Pausche stated that government accounting for special revenue funds does not include depreciation in the budget. Pausche said the Dock Program needs to work on planning out large projects (dredging, rip rap, and slip replacments) and that is why the Capital Plan for the dock program was created. Kelly said there are maintenance schedules which the dock program follows for the multiple slip complexes. 9. Reports Gillespie stated it is an election year and there will be two new City Council members and the Mayor's seat up for election. Gillespie said she is not running again for Council, nor is Jennifer Peterson or Mayor Wegscheid. MOTION by Peterson, seconded by Gardner, to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Submitted by: Kevin Kelly 2431 .1 ivi • • l' • ' • • Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode, David Pelka, Jake Saystrom, Jameson Smieja. Absent: Jennifer Peterson and Philip Velsor. Staff present: Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Dan Gallus, 2072 Shorewood La; Greg Powell, 5010 Woodland Rd; Peter & Kathy Norton, 6256 Red Oak Rd; Dan Boll, 3066 Brighton Commons; Ed Ring, EGR Properties. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Case No. 18-16 address should be Shoreline Drive. MOTION by Bussey, second by Goode, to approve the agenda as amended. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2018 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Smieja, second by Baker, to approve the September 4, 2018 meeting minutes as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS PC Case No. 18-16 Conditional Use Permit Amendment (CUP) 5293 Shoreline Drive Applicant: Dave Allen and Greg Powell, Wheels to Waves Trapp introduced the request summarizing current and requested use. The existing CUP allows operation of an oil, lubrication and transmission fluid change facility under the category of Minor Auto Repair. The applicant requests an amendment to include sales and installation of electronic equipment on cars, trucks, boats, and recreational vehicles.. Building and site activities are not changing or intensifying. The current hardcover of the site is over the 75% maximum. Since it is an existing condition there is no change required. Parking on the site is adequate, except there is no handicap accessible parking, which will be addressed by Building Official. There is a concern about the 2432 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 2 October 2, 2018 site triangle and it is recommended that the property owner and/or tenant meet with the Director of Public Works to evaluate and parking may need to be removed from that area. Since there is parking above the required that should not be an issue. Requirements for building materials do not apply as no change is anticipated. Signage is existing and any changes will require permitting. Hennepin County has indicated interest in removing one of the street accesses to the property. Staff prefers an overall study of accesses on a corridor -wide level. In upcoming years there will be changes along Shoreline Drive. It is a concern that, if we change the configuration now, that it may not work for future development. Staff recommends approval of the CUP with recommendations and findings of fact as outlined in the planning report. It is also recommended that there be a preparation of a new CUP, in lieu of simply adding items, to keep the requirements as clean as possible instead of stacking one on top of the other. Saystrom requested clarification of site triangle. Trapp described the basic requirements and purpose, but suggested that staff should meet on-site to discuss with the owner. Baker clarified that the amended CUP was to be minor auto repair plus the installation of electronic equipment. Trapp stated that, rather than eliminating minor auto repair it was better to keep it and add the electronic installation. To add it back in at a later date would require another CUP change and make it more difficult for the owner to maintenance a tenant. Members of the commission discussed the current parking issues. In answer to a concern by Smieja, Trapp confirmed that the building file has evidence that the fuel tanks from an earlier use of the property have been properly removed. Ed Ring, property owner, addressed the commission stating that trying to get this lot cleaned up has been the biggest burden. The new tenants will be doing only electronic installations and will be much cleaner. Bussey asked Ring about keeping the 1987 CUP activities. Ring would like to eliminate chemicals from the site but it may be advantageous to keep it in the CUP should a future tenant require it. Saystrom asked what the plan was to add green space. Ring said that the bank is requesting a landscape upgrade. He would like to do the whole property at the same time. The commission offered positive comments regarding the plan for this property. Greg Powell, 5010 Woodland Road, (proposed tenant) expressed willingness to answer any questions. 2433 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 3 October 2, 2018 Smieja asked about his needs for storage. Powell indicated that he doesn't want anything stored outside. He anticipates a high-end customer base and needs the business appearance to be clean and orderly. Smieja asked if he had any intentions to do minor auto repair. Powell has no intention. He went on to say that they do pull cars apart to install the electronics but mechanical repair only if they've broken something. Powell said that much of the work will be done off -sight only using this location as a hub. He anticipates only two employees on-site at any one given time. Discussion Smieja would like to eliminate the minor auto repair from the CUP. Trapp was concerned because the owner asked for flexibility and only adding a use. Penner asked about strengthening the verbiage to assist in enforcement. Pelka sees these problem properties all over town and we don't do anything about them. He thought that, if we took away the current CUP we would be putting restrictions on businesses. The owner would have to come back and request another amendment. The rules in code need to be enforced. He leans toward just adding the use and not restricting the property value. If something is a problem we need to address it and fine it instead of trying to micro -manage every other detail. We seem to always be dealing with these problems all over the city, one at a time. Saystrom asked if this property is subject to the nuisance regulations that have been discussed recently. Trapp stated that the CUP is the tool for enforcement more than anything else. We may want to be more specific with condition 6, stating where parking and storage is allowed. Pelka thought that this property has a very narrow use. We need to create rules that are enforceable on other properties that aren't being maintained as well. The eyesore issues need to be dealt with. We have no fining ability. Smieja proposed the following wording for Condition No. 6: The storage of used tires, batteries, and other site business related items, including those displayed for sale, located outside the building, shall be controlled; such items shall be displayed in specifically designed containers and be limited to one or two areas, with storage items not displayed for sale not visible from CR -15 (Shoreline Drive). Junk cars, empty cans, and any other unsightly materials shall not be permitted in areas subject to public view. Baker added that the problem is not just junk cars, but cars that don't move for weeks. Bussey was inclusive of both minor auto repair in and the proposed use. If the proposed business moves on and goes back to minor auto repair we only have one of the six conditions being required. Trapp said it's because they are not requesting any building modifications so the other conditions do not apply. 2434 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 4 October 2, 2018 Smieja asked what the result would be of revoking the current CUP and going with a new CUP for electronic installations only and the proposed tenant deal fall through. What predicament would we put the owner in? Trapp noted that she has concerned about removing a CUP that was not requested by the applicant. The typical process for removing a CUP is that the applicant is not fulfilling the conditions and is notified by the City with a timeframe given for responding. If the conditions are still not met than the City holds a public hearing about removing the CUP. None of that process applies in this situation. Baker said that Condition No. 7 says that: the resolution for the CUP amendment shall be prepared to include current activities for minor auto repair provided under Resolution No. 87- 32 along with the proposed additional activities; also the historical special use and conditional use permits for the property shall be extinguished. Trapp explained that we are writing a new CUP that will include what was previously allowed as well as the new activities. Eliminating the previous CUP is strictly cleaning up for clarity so all requirements are in the same place. Discussion ensued by commissioners on the pros and cons of revoking the current CUP and approving the new CUP without minor auto repair. Trapp stated that specific parking terms for customer cars vs. fleet vehicles can be defined in the CUP at a later date if it becomes an issue. The current CUP is fairly limited in its storage requirements. Trapp also thought that Recommendation #6 needs to be specific without be onerous. Establishing a time length of parking will be a challenge in terms of the ability to enforce. Smieja suggested that a CUP is a tool to control the look of these properties. Smieja restated his suggested verbiage for Recommendation No. 6. Baker wants to know the owner's opinion of that addition. Mr. Ring is in favor of that addition since it allows flexibility should he need to find another tenant in the future. Saystrom thought that something needed to be added to address the long-term storage of vehicles as in "storage of vehicles except fleet vehicles shall not be allowed on the site for more than one week". Ring said in the lease it says 3 days maximum. Several commissioners thought that a week would be reasonable with the exception of fleet vehicles. Mr. Ring stated that the quality of the vehicles will be upscale considering the type of service the business is offering. MOTION by Goode, seconded by Pelka, to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment as presented, including Staff Recommendations with specific recommendations in 2435 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft October 2, 2018 Paragraph No. 6 as amended by Smieja and Saystrom and Findings of Fact. MOTION carried unanimously. PC Case No. 18-14 Expansion Permit for Replacement House 2072 Shorewood Lane Applicant: Dan Gallus, Michael Gallus Construction Trapp introduced the request. This expansion permit was originally approved in 2017 but building permit was not obtained within the required one year. Applicant states that this is the same request as in 2017. Some measurements were not shown on the documents but the revised survey fixes that problem. The 1935 house will be demolished and rebuilt in the same location. Staff recommends approval. Baker questioned the difference between renewal and a new expansion approval. Trapp didn't believe there was any difference. This is the first renewal of an expansion permit we've had. Saystrom asked if there was an elevation change since last time. Trapp said there was no change. Smieja asked about minimizing the non -conformances. Trapp said that it was her understanding that it should be the same as last time. The verbiage of deck vs. screened porch was discussed. Dan Gallus, 3907 Pine La, St. Bonifacius, stated that they are trying to use the existing foundation. It will be in the same place except for straightening out the north wall. Porches on both sides are covered. MOTION by Smieja, seconded by Bussey, to recommend approval of the Expansion Permit as presented, including Staff Recommendations and Findings of Fact. MOTION carried unanimously. Old/New Business A. Review/recommendation —2040 Spring Park Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) Trapp reviewed the Spring Park Comp Plan. The only formal comment was regarding the transportation improvement projects for Shoreline and Interlachen and a note to Spring Park that Mound would like to know about them. There were some issues between densities in text and the map, but they will get caught by their staff. MOTION by Bussey, second by Smieja, to recommend formal response with comments noted above. MOTION carried unanimously. B. Review/update/discussion — Mound 2040 Comprehensive Plan 2436 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft October 2, 2018 Comments have been received from Three Rivers Park District, Minnetrista, MnDNR, and the Met Council. Orono and MnDOT made no comments and waived further review. The public hearing is set for October 30tH • Three Rivers Park District had some technical and labeling comments— nothing significant • Minnetrista — no significant changes • MnDNR — comments were generic in nature and not specific to Mound • Met Council — preliminary review — Staff is working through their comments. The biggest change was to housing. They want more narrative that links the housing assessment to what we know from the data. Trapp summarized the changes to population and forecasting. The Met Council wants Mound to make changes to our forecasts which was done and approved. A table will be created for the commission to review in a future meeting. Trapp continued the review of each of the proposed mixed use districts as requested by the Planning Commission and started at the September meeting. Eden District Shirley Hills Elementary is located south of this district, which is a good family amenity. It's close to the Lost Lake Trail and borders Shoreline Drive, which provides a good roadway but compromises the view. The district plan has residential more dense towards Shoreline Drive decreasing south. Buildings along Shoreline Drive should be oriented toward each other rather than facing Shoreline Drive. Area would be zoned Multi -family. Discussion ensued about the hypothetical design of the area and the reasons for multi- family along Shoreline Drive. It was thought that the intensity of apartment buildings may not be well received by the general public. Promenade District (Commerce Boulevard south of Shoreline Drive) The Promenade District is impacted by lake and flood plain on both sides and has shallow lot depths with many small lots. Redevelopment will likely occur in pockets with larger residential and institutional uses to remain over the long term. The last plan was primarily commercial. Development would probably be piecemeal. A view of the lakes between buildings is desired. Village Center (Schafer Richardson/Wells Fargo corner) Commercial should be concentrated near the intersection of Commerce Boulevard and Shoreline Drive. Building heights should be taller along Commerce and lower towards the adjacent residential neighborhood. Care should be taken to the on-site accesses from both roads as well as seeing to pedestrian friendly internal circulation. 2437 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft October 2, 2018 Concerns were expressed about height limitations and the look of parking lots. There was also discussion about commercial in the downtown vs. only residential on the site. There was an interest in rewording the district description to highlight activating the commercial corridors rather than necessarily concentration of commercial in the corner, especially given the property ownership situation. East Gateway (East Shoreline Drive) Commercial should be concentrated near the intersection of Bartlett Boulevard and Shoreline Drive. Building heights should be taller along Commerce and lower towards the residential neighborhoods. Wilshire/Tuxedo This is a mixed use area adopted as part of 2030 plan. Use to be primarily residential; maybe mixed with 7-15 units per acre. Smieja did not remember that a single entrance multi -family (apartment -style) building was desirable. The quality and fit into neighbor matters. He feels that townhomes would be better because they fit with the neighborhood. Apartment buildings look like warehouses and people don't like it. Trapp asked if it's about multi -family or about the look. Consensus was that it was about the look and it was requested that the district description be reworded to better capture the look being sought. C. Request to schedule November 20, 2018 Special Meeting MOTION by Smieja, second by Baker, to set November 20, 2018 as a special commission meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. D. Staff Update 1) Reminder: Grandview Middle School volunteer request October 31st and November 1st 2) Grand Opening of Harrison Bay Senior Living, 1861 Commerce Boulevard, Sunday, October 28, 2018 3) Planning Commission candidate interviews —Tuesday, December 4th. MOTION by Penner, second by Goode, to adjourn at 10:25 pm. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander 2438 MINUTES - DRAFT MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2018 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, David Goode, David Pelka, Jake Saystrom, Jameson Smieja, and Philip Velsor. Absent: David Goode, Jennifer Peterson, and Dean Bussey. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Ben Schmidt, 4397 Wilshire Blvd; Vionca Alvorado, 5979 Idlewood Rd; Jim & Gina Gountonis, 2601 Commerce Blvd; Jason Zattler, 2345 Commerce Blvd; Sarah Lenkins, 1716 Dove La MOTION by Smieja, second by Baker, to approve the agenda as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING — Review of 2040 Mound Comprehensive Plan Consultant Planner Rita Trapp summarized the proposed 2040 Comp Plan including the following: • long range document and broad in scope; • provides general land use guidance for the community; • high level of decision making for the city. Comp Plan process was: • Launched in 2017 • Community engagement on-line to see what people were looking for in the future, confirming the vision, and seeing if the vision needed to be altered • Planning Commission engagement to develop the land use plan and approach • Open house inviting the general community and specific property owners affected by the suggested land use changes 2439 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft October 30, 2018 • Public hearing in March where the community was invited to comment on the entire draft of the plan • Six month review by affected and adjacent governmental agencies Trapp reviewed the general contents, city growth projections, market overview, retail and residential trends\directions, and future land use plan that generally maintains the direction set in the 2030 plan. Mixed Use Focus Areas (mixed use is a new designation) provides flexibility to respond to the marketplace at the property owner's discretion. The Comp Plan is structured with an information sheet for each focus area, highlighting the intent, the considerations, and building design guidance. The 2030 Comp Plan also had mixed-use areas but each district was individually named rather than having a general mixed-use area as is proposed in the 2040 Comp Plan. After the Comp Plan is finalized the zoning for each area will need to be altered to implement the changes. Downtown Lakes (previously the Pedestrian District) — mixed-use district with historic synergy. Proposed as townhomes and multi -family; density is 8+ units per acre, same as in the 2030 Comp Plan; previous density was 7-12 units per acre; Trapp outlined the history of the area (Mound Visions). Four public improvements were identified (and accomplished) as needed to spur private re -investment in the community: the dredging of the Lost Lake canal, the relocation of CR 15 and Auditors Road, relocation of the post office, and creation of the Lost Lake Greenway. The AUAR (Alternative Area Wide Review) was an environmental document that reviewed and identified potential impacts of the contemplated development (Mound Visions) of the area. Village Center (previously the Destination District) — north of Shoreline Drive. Guided mixed- use, townhome, multifamily, denser, some type of commercial (not necessarily at the corner, but along the Shoreline or Commerce activating the space) Eden (previously part of the Destination District) — single family use is dictated by the elementary school, multi -family and townhomes most likely along Shoreline Drive Promenade (previously the Linear District) — biggest change is the recognition that residential and commercial can co -exist in this district East Gateway — entrance to the community, most appropriate if redevelopment to occur for small townhome development Wilshire/Tuxedo —townhomes or smaller multi -family with medium density 2440 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 3 October 30, 2018 Surfside Park — City is currently finishing up the Surfside master plan, not a drastic change, inclusion of elements that meet the needs of the community and technical needs for maintenance and stormwater management. Adjacent Jurisdiction and Agency Review — comments received were generally technical in nature. Most significant changes were the projection changes discussed at the previous Planning Commission meeting and additional information provided in the Housing and Implementation chapters. The additional information helps to further describe the City's housing needs and adds an action table with timeframes to guide future initiatives. Discussion Saystrom questioned the Met Council comments on meeting housing goals. Lost Lake was listed as one of the new developments. Trapp noted that Lost Lake had been developed since the 2030 Comprehensive Plan so that is why it was included. Baker pointed out the name confusion between Indian Knoll vs. Balsam Hill. Trapp will follow up and get that corrected. Saystrom had never seen a tree preference list and questioned whether it is invasive species motivated? Trapp stated that it is more about encouraging diversity of tree stock. Baker asked where the Implementation Actions come from. Trapp indicated that they are in each of the chapters. A summary was just pulled out and timeframes added to respond to a Met Council request. Smieja asked if the implementation Actions list is meant to be a fully comprehensive list. Trapp noted that this is the list for the comp plan only. It does not preclude things that the City may identify in the future. Smieja was interested in a new action similar to the park signage for town signage. He noted that he thought that it had been discussed previously. It would be similar to some of the other towns that declare that you are entering their town when on roads and trails. Also, there is interest in repainting the water tower. Smieja asked if the Alano property re -guiding was done to hit the acreage for housing goals? Trapp said that the re -guiding was not for housing goals but to prevent it from redeveloping as another neighborhood commercial use. Given that it would be redevelopment Staff felt that medium density was more realistic. Public Discussion Jason Zattler, 2325 Commerce Blvd, is a long time business owner representing the business owners along the strip. The vision years ago was a bit different than what Trapp presented. It cost a lot of money; about $10-12 million. Zattler noted that if you re -zone to mixed-use he could build a personal use storage facility. His point is to be careful what you ask for if you move to mixed zoning. Relative to the townhome discussions, he advised to tread carefully and 2441 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 4 October 30, 2018 slow it down a bit. Next 10-20 years there will be enough density around us to support retail. Zattler questions the rationale behind high density residential and whether it was needed to meet the Met Council plan for housing. He questions the timeline for putting all this into place. He also asked about what feedback was received from other cities as to what it should look like. Saystrom asked about Zattler's comment about personal storage units. Zattler stated that he could build a personal storage facility in the woods behind his business. He cited his experience with a neighboring community. Saystrom asked if he was afraid that there would be a lot of high-density residential. Zattler stated that traffic has substantially increased and will be a nightmare with the additional density downtown. Mound lacks the infrastructure to support the housing density the Met Council is asking for. Saystrom asked what the concern was about slowing down. Zattler replied that volume of traffic has substantially increased. If all of the housing is thrown in from downtown, it would be horrendous. We don't have the infrastructure to support all that traffic. Keep more of the downtown as the eye of commercial. All the Minnetrista new housing will be looking for a convenient commercial area to support. Trapp clarified mixed-use stating that currently the 2030 Comp Plan guides the downtown as mixed-use. In fact, mixed-use pre -dates the 2030 comp plan. Zoning districts were created to implement the comprehensive plan for mixed use areas. Properties were not zoned into a mixed-use district until they were ready to be developed. Properties are guided mixed-use but not zoned mixed-use. We use the Planned Use Development (PUD) tool, which requires a conditional use permit, to designate the uses. Smieja asked considering the way we've done it in the past, if a storage unit could be put up. Trapp wasn't certain whether it was allowed in the certain business zones. It was noted that in the current pedestrian mixed use district a private garage was allowed. However, that would require a PUD If such as use was desired after an initial development was approved, an amendment would be needed. Smith stated that the PUD districts include a high level of design standards. The existing district where Mr. Zattler's business is currently has the B-1 zoning. The Walgreen's and Lost Lake sites were rezoned to Pedestrian to match their guiding. Smieja remarked that the CUP and PUD for these identified developments is very important to us. That's why the CUP is a great tool to approve or not approve what is contemplated. There are specific uses identified as approved. If it's not in the table, that means we have to amend that zoning district and go through the process of a public hearing. Trapp continued explaining the PED/PUD District providing additional information about the purpose, permitted uses, conditional uses, and accessory uses As noted previously, amendments are needed whenever development doesn't match previous approvals. For 2442 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft October 30, 2018 example, the Landings townhome developer had to come back and ask for an amendment to the CUP. Trapp stated that medium and high density in the plan is for diversity of housing stock. Most of the land is already developed. Based on market trends we know that there is a need for diversified housing. There have been requests from property owners for more flexibility for their property. The commercial areas need revitalization. We have enough lands to meet Met Council requirements. The downtown in particular is not changing from the previous plans. Zattler asked how market trends were taken into consideration if the market starts to slow down. Trapp was not sure how much adjustment would be required if there was a slowdown. The districts as proposed provide flexibility which should be good to address a changing marketplace. Zattler is reflecting back to the previous Comp Plan and only the first section was done. Trapp said that lack of development was not due to the Comp Plan not providing guidance or being a barrier. Barriers are due to non -city ownership, especially in the Harbor District. Pelka felt that the concern is about density. An issue is that Mound has no walkable streets. The lake is primarily private and doesn't provide easy access to businesses like Excelsior and Wayzata. Trends are killing the need for commercial space. He struggles with the densities as proposed and doesn't see Mound becoming a commercial nexus. It really comes down to how much density will you allow and what kind of properties can get built. Zattler summarized that the issue is how to re -invent Mound to get people to come here, aside from the school district. Small town, small town needs. Smieja would love more commercial but can't see us suddenly needing all the commercial space. Jim Gountanis, 2601 Commerce Blvd, wanted to confirm that the Promenade District would be zoned from B-1 to mixed-use. Trapp summarized the change and the re -zoning process. Smith stated that Mr. Gountanis' property is an existing single-family home with a legal non- conforming use. The proposed change would allow the maintenance of the property and new structures to be constructed, changing your property to a permitted use. One of the goals would be to allow property owners to make improvements and build new. That would be an outcome of the Camp Plan with the creation of the districts. Mr. Gountanis asked if it becomes mixed-use could he remove his house and rebuild as a business. Smith replied that the protocol has been that the zoning would match the guiding and your project would be approved as a CUP with a PUD. We may be able to do that more simply. This will be a part of the follow up that will occur after the Comprehensive Plan is adopted. 2443 Planning Commission Minutes - Draft Close Public Hearing October 30, 2018 Smieja was concerned about the potential impacts of mixed-use. The question is what control a PUD or CUP gives. Trapp affirmed that that level of detail will be dealt with next year during the re -zoning process. An extensive discussion ensued regarding the ability to control proposed projects, particularly as regards density. The Planning Commission discussed each of the mixed use districts to evaluate the appropriateness of the density ranges. It was determined that the Planning Commission was comfortable with all but the Village Center Focus Area. MOTION by Smieja, second by Baker, to recommend approval of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan with a specific changes as follows: add specific action plans to the Implementation Actions regarding establishing and implementing improved and uniform town signage to brand Mound at all major intersections and trail points; an action item for water tower rehab/beautification project; reduce the units per acre for the Village Center Focus Area from a maximum of 30 units to 20 units as 30 units would not be good there. Pelka made a friendly amendment to change the maximum units per acre from 30 to 20 (preferred) or up to 25 units per acre. Smieja accepted MOTION carried unanimously. IT -1 11 I 8 MOTION by Penner, second by Smieja, to adjourn at 10:34 pm. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander 2444 November 9, 2018 Dear Water System Owner, The Minnesota Department of Health Oral Health Program and Drinking Water Protection Section are pleased to present you with the 2017 Water Fluoridation Quality Award. This award, created by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recognizes those public water systems (PWSs) that adjust the fluoride concentration in drinking water and achieve a monthly average fluoride level that is in the optimal range for 12 consecutive months in a calendar year, as documented in the CDC Water Fluoridation Reporting System (WFRS). CDC initiated the Water Fluoridation Quality Awards program to recognize outstanding performance in fluoridation management by public water systems. In Minnesota, 233 of 605 possible fluoridating community PWSs are receiving awards for 2017. You can use your Quality Award to promote health through community water fluoridation. Receiving this award provides you with an opportunity to highlight the excellent work being done by your water system. To assist you in promoting this achievement, an electronic copy of a press release that can be tailored for your community is available upon request at health.oral@state.mn.us Congratulations on this outstanding effort and thank you for providing safe, dependable drinking water for your community. If you have any questions about the award or would like further information, please contact either David Rindal at (651) 201-4660 and david.rindal@state.mn.us or Clare Larkin at (651) 201-4230 and clare.larkin@state.mn.us. Sincerely, Prasida Khanal, MPH BDS Daniel Symonik, PhD State Oral Health Director Assistant Manager Oral Health Program Drinking Water Protection Section Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Health Protecting, Maintaining and Improving the Health of All Minnesotans An equol opportunity employer. 2445 rL o zr t° a r7nTC. N CL Q E Z vID p r to i P t7 , fb a I Q a MOUND PRESS RELEASE — November 13, 2018 Mound Planning Commissioner Candidates Sought — APPLICATIONS DUE NOV 26 The City of Mound is accepting applications for the Planning Commission for term(s) beginning January 1, 2019. The Planning Commission acts as a recommending body to the Mound City Council, meets the first Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. and periodically on the 3rd Tuesday as needed. The commission considers all matters pertaining to planning and zoning, including Mound redevelopment land use considerations. Call Sarah at 952-472-0604 for more info. See the city website under "Government" or email jillnorlander@cityofmound.com for an application. Submittal deadline 12:00 p.m. on Monday, November 26, 2018. Interviews will be held as part of the December 3, 2018 Planning Commission meeting at 7:00 pm. Appointments will be made by the City Council at the December 11th council meeting. Prior candidates and participants are encouraged to apply. Candidates for the Planning Commission must be a resident of Mound. Mound Representative to the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board of Directors Sought — APPLICATIONS DUE DEC 4 The Lake Minnetonka Conservation District (Imcd.org) is governed by a voluntary Board of Directors composed of one member appointed by the city councils of the 14 municipalities that border Lake Minnetonka. The board provides direction for the organization, develops policies and initiatives, and helps build partnerships to carry out the mission of preserving and enhancing the `Lake Minnetonka experience". Serving on the board is a great way to guide the future of Lake Minnetonka, helping to protect the lake, the communities, and all those who enjoy it. The LMCD meets on the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month (excluding the second meeting in November and December) at Wayzata City Hall, 600 Rice Street, at 7:00 p.m. Candidates must be a resident of Mound to apply. The City of Mound is accepting applications for appointment to the LMCD Board as Mound's representative through 12 noon on Tuesday, December 4th. Interviews will be held at the December 11th final council meeting of the year at 7:00 pm. See cityofmound.com or call 952-472-0607 for an application. Mound Council•Candidates Sought - ..• DJAN UE 17,:":- With + With the election of Ray Salazar as Mayor, it is anticipated that there will be a vacancy on the City Council once he takes the Oath of Office for Mayor on January 8, 2019. Therefore, the City is seeking applications from residents interested in being appointed to the City Council to complete Mr. Salazar's council member term which expires 12/31/2020. The City of Mound is a Statutory Class B City, having a City Council/City Manager form of government. An elected City Council sets the policy and overall direction for Mound. Then, city employees, under the direction of the City Manager, carry out council decisions and provide day-to-day city services. The City Council meets the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of every month at 7:00 p.m. in regular session. Special meetings are called as needed and council members serve on one or more of the advisory commissions or council subcommittees. The City of Mound is accepting applications for appointment to the City Council through 12 noon on Tuesday, January 15th, with interviews to be held at the January 22nd regular council meeting with a possible second round of interviews at a special meeting tentatively set for Tuesday, January 291h. See cityofmound.com or call 952-472-0607 for an application. 2447 F :�a • W,10IM ill • r;•ir •; • - a - • 1 - r • • r! ill 1• 11 . •Ili • • i r i 111 11111111 -ffiwt =* The recount isopen to public ii quorum of City Council may be City Clerk Posted f j