The URL can be used to link to this page

2018-08-28 CC Agenda PacketPLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY OF MOUND MISSION STATEMENT: The City of Mound, through teamwork and cooperation, provides at a reasonable cost, quality services that respond to the needs of all citizens, fostering a safe, attractive and flourishing community. AGENDA MOUND CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2018 - 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING MOUND CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the ConsentAgenda are considered routine in nature and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. In that event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Opening meeting 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve agenda, with any amendments *Consent Agenda: Items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine in nature, have been evaluated by staff, recommended by staff for approval by the Council, and will be enacted by a single roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member or Citizen so requests. At this time, anyone present who wishes to offer dissenting comment to any items on the Consent Agenda is invited to identify themselves and the item of concern so that the it may be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered after discussion in normal sequence. Separate introduction or further support from petitioners or requestors is not required at this time and removal of an item from the Consent Agenda for this purpose is not required or appropriate. 4. *Consent Agenda Page *A. Approve payment of claims 1504-1530 *B. Approve Minutes: 8-15-18 Rescheduled Regular Meeting 1531-1533 *C. Approve Pay Request #2 in the amount of $41,959.12 to Minger Construction 1534-1535 for 2018 Lift Station Replacement and Sewer Reroute Project, PW -18-03, 05 *D. Approve Miscellaneous project -related pay requests for 2017 Street, 1536-1539 Utility, and Retaining Wall Improvement Project PW 17-01, 03 and Emergency Storm Sewer Repair on Auditors Rd. *E. Approve Resolution Affirming the City of Mound has No Comments Regarding 1540 - 1551 the 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan 1543 *F. Approve Resolution Affirming the City of Mound has No Comments Regarding 1552 - 1556 the 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan 1555 *G. Approve Resolution approving a front yard and side yard setback variance for 1557-1581 1680 Dove Lane Planning Case No. 18-08 PID No. 13-117-24-12-0270 1558 *H. Approve Resolution Approving Expansion Permit for 1566 Eagle Lane 1582- 1599 Planning Case No. 18-10 PID No. 12-117-24-43-0002 1583 *I. Approve Resolution Approving Sign Variation/Modification for 1600- 1622 PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & PAGERS IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS. 1861 Commerce Boulevard 1602 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. (Limit to 3 minutes per speaker.) 6. Eric Hoversten, City Manager and Public Works Director, requesting discussion and action 1623-1648 on a Resolution Approving Unbudgeted Expenditure to Repair Parking Lot Pavements in 1626 Central Business District Shared Parking Areas 7. Eric Hoversten, City Manager and Public Works Director, requesting discussion on the use 1649-1655 of Park Dedication Fees 8. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/Reports from Council members B. Reports: Harbor Wine & Spirits -June & July 2018 1656-1657 Finance Department - July 2018 1658-1660 C. Minutes: Planning Commission 05-01-18 1661-1673 D. Correspondence: 9. Adjourn COUNCIL BRIEFING August 28, 2018 Upcoming Events Schedule: Don't Forget!! 23 August - 3 September - State Fair 4 September - Westonka Schools Resume Classes 8 September - Running of the Bays 11 September - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 11 September - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 25 September - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 25 September - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 9 October - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 9 October - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 16 October - 6:30 Special Meeting Budget Workshop 23 October - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 23 October - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 6November - General Elections 13 November - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 13 November - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 27 November - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 27 November - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting 11 December - 6:55 PM - HRA Regular Meeting (as may be required) 11 December - 7:00 PM - City Council Regular Meeting City Offices Closed 3 September 2018 - Labor Day City Official's Absences Please notify the City Manager in advance of an absence. Some votes require more than a simple majority and Staff needs to plan accordingly. Inauire in advance. please...... Council members are asked to call or email their questions in advance of a public meeting so that more research may be done or additional information may be provided that will assist in your quality decision- making. City of Mound Claims 08-28-18 YEAR BATCH NAME DOLLAR AMOUNT 2018 0818UBREFUND $ 579.69 2018 082218CTYMAN $ 12,077.32 2018 082418CTYMAN $ 61334.15 2018 0718HOISKEN $ 71865.89 2018 B&M#7-2018 $ 93,129.63 2018 082818CITY $ 511269.89 2018 082818HWS $ 1041253.82 TOTAL CLAIMS 11 $ 275,510.39 -1504- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Batch Name 0818UBREFUND Payment Computer Dollar Amt $579.69 Posted Refer 1 AUTHORITY TITLE INC. Ck# 056918 8/22/2018 Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 6316 LYNWOOD BLVD- J. NEGAARD UTILITY REFUND- AUTHORITY TITLE EP Invoice 082218 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 2 BURNET TITLE- EDINA Ck# 056919 8/22/2018 Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2311 NORWOOD LN- T. VERLEY UTILITY REFUND- BURNET TITLE EDINA Invoice 082218 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 3 LENDSERV-BLMGT Ck# 056920 8/22/2018 Cash Payment R 601-49400-36200 Miscellaneous Revenu 2560 LAKEWOOD LN- N. VANECEK UTILITY REFUND-LENDSERV-BLMGT Invoice 082218 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 601 WATER FUND 10100 Wells Fargo $579.69 Pre -Written Checks $579.69 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $579.69 $579.69 _1505- 08/23/18 11:43 AM Page 1 $219.61 $219.61 $185.99 $185.99 $174.09 $174.09 Batch Name 082218CTYMAN Payment Refer 4ANDERSON, DOUG CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Computer Dollar Amt $12,077.32 Posted Cash Payment E 101-41410-431 Meeting Expense Invoice 082218 8/162018 Transaction Date 8222018 Ck# 056921 8/22/2018 PRECINCT #1 ELECTION JUDGE FOOD STIPEND- PRIMARY ELECTION 8 -14 -18 - REIMS D. ANDERSON Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 1 DMK HOMES Ck# 056922 8/22/2018 Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow BP #2017-00994- 2326 NORWOOD LN- DMK HOMES- NEW CONSTRUCTION ESCROW REFUND Invoice 082218 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 5 DOEPNER-HO VE, STACY Cash Payment E 101-41410-431 Meeting Expense Invoice 082218 8/162018 Transaction Date 8222018 Ck# 056923 8/22/2018 PRECINCT #2 ELECTION JUDGE FOOD STIPEND- PRIMARY ELECTION 8 -14 -18 - REIMS S. DOEPNER-HOVE Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 2 GUTEKUNST, JOE Ck# 056924 8/22/2018 Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow BP #2017-00208 - 5245 SEABURY RD - J GUTEKUNST- NEW CONSTRUCTION ESCROW REFUND Invoice 082218 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 3 MEDIACOM Ck# 056925 8/22/2018 Cash Payment E 101-42110-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi ORONO PD INTERNET SVC 48-16-18 THRU 9- 15-18 Invoice 082218 8/62018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 6 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSO Ck# 056926 8/22/2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 10TH ANNUAL MRWA OPERATOR EXPO SEPT 12TH- WACONIA- S. KIVISTO Invoice 082218 8/142018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 10TH ANNUAL MRWA OPERATOR EXPO SEPT 12TH- WACONIA- B. KRESS Invoice 082218 8/142018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 10TH ANNUAL MRWA OPERATOR EXPO SEPT 12TH- WACONIA- L. PITSENBERGER Invoice 082218 8/142018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-434 Conference & Training REGISTRATION 10TH ANNUAL MRWA OPERATOR EXPO SEPT 12TH- WACONIA- N. SPRENGELER Invoice 082218 8/142018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total -1506- 08/23/18 11:45 AM Page 1 $50.00 $50.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $50.00 $50.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $95.90 $95.90 $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 $125.00 $500.00 CITY OF MOUND 08/23/1811: 45 AM Page 2 Payments Current Period: August 2018 Refer 8 VERIZON WIRELESS Ck# 056927 8/22/2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE LADDER TRUCK#44 $35.01 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi SEWER TRUCK#109 DATACARD SVC 7-11- $35.01 18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS SUPV VEHC #113 R. HANSON $35.01 DATACARD SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Project 18-3 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUB WKS JET PACK LAPTOP AIRCARD SVC $35.01 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Project 18-3 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 7-11-18 $17.51 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi FIELD OFFICER DATACARD SVC 7-11-18 $17.50 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #42 DUTY $35.01 OFFICER 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE UNIT #39 FIRE CHIEF $35.01 RESCUE UTILITY 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE #43 RESCUE TRUCK $35.01 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi DATACARD SVC FIRE ENGINE #29 SVC 7-11- $35.01 18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #315 DATACARD SVC 7-11- $35.01 18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi WATER TRUCK #512 R. PRICH DATACARD $35.01 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.51 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $17.50 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT SPOT- $35.01 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $35.01 SPOT 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi STREETS LEAD WORKER TABLET- $35.01 INTERNET SVC- 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 -1507- CITY OF MOUND 08/23/1811: 45 AM Page 3 Payments Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $35.01 TABLET- INTERNET SVC- 7-11-18 THRU 8-10- 18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Project 18-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PUBLIC WORKS SUPER- RAY HANSON - $35.01 TABLET- HOT SPOT SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10- 18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Project 18-5 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.50 SPOT- SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY LEAD WORKER TABLET- HOT $17.51 SPOT- SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi PARKS LEAD WORKER TABLET- INTERNET $35.01 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NEW STREETS TABLET DATACARD $35.01 INTERNET SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi NEW STREETS TABLET $0.00 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET $17.50 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi UTILITY 7726- NEW TABLET- INTERNET $17.51 SVC 7-11-18 THRU 8-10-18 Invoice 9812521270 8/102018 Transaction Date 8222018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $735.21 Refer 7 VERIZON WIRELESS Ck# 056927 8/22/2018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $148.01 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $116.70 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $127.42 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 Cash Payment E 101-42400-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $38.42 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $93.93 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 Cash Payment E 101-41310-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $55.31 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $50.76 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 Cash Payment E 101-42115-321 Telephone, Cells, & Radi CELL PHONE CHARGES 7-14-18 THRU 8-13- $15.66 18 Invoice 9812756129 8/132018 -1508- Transaction Date 8222018 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Due 0 Wells Fargo 10100 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 602 SEWER FUND $354.99 601 WATER FUND $739.23 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $225.81 101 GENERAL FUND $10,757.29 $12,077.32 Pre -Written Checks $12,077.32 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $0.00 Total $12,077.32 _1509- 08/23/18 11:45 AM Page 4 Total $646.21 Batch Name 082418CTYMAN Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 User Dollar Amt $6,334.15 Computer Dollar Amt $6,334.15 Total Refer 7 PEDERSON, GREG _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FIREFLEXTURNOUT GEAR BAGS- 4 QTY- 2 GOLD, 2 BLACK- REIMBURSE G. PEDERSON Invoice 082418-2 8212018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 6 PEDERSON, GREG $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 EVERLAST ENTERPRISES INC. _ Cash Payment G 101-23150 New Construction Escrow BP #2017-00453- 6320 LINDER LN- EVERLAST ENTERPRISES- NEW Invoice 082418 8222018 CONSTRUCTION ESCROW REFUND Invoice 082418 8222018 REIMBURSE AIRFARE, TRANSPORTATION, Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 7 PEDERSON, GREG _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-210 Operating Supplies FIREFLEXTURNOUT GEAR BAGS- 4 QTY- 2 GOLD, 2 BLACK- REIMBURSE G. PEDERSON Invoice 082418-2 8212018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 6 PEDERSON, GREG _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE LODGING- G. PEDERSON- FIRE RESCUE INTL CONFERENCE- DALLAS TX AUG 8 THRU AUG 11 2018 Invoice 082418 8222018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-434 Conference & Training REIMBURSE AIRFARE, TRANSPORTATION, MILEAGE, PARKING- G. PEDERSON- FIRE RESCUE INTL CONFERENCE- DALLAS TX AUG 8 THRU AUG 11 2018 Invoice 082418 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $5,000.00 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $1,334.15 $6,334.15 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $6,334.15 Total $6,334.15 -1510- 08/23/18 11:48 AM Page 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $240.00 $240.00 $723.35 $370.80 $1,094.15 Batch Name 0718HOISKEN Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 User Dollar Amt $7,865.89 Computer Dollar Amt $7,865.89 Refer 7 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP, 1 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 007-001-120 8/92018 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 017-003-14 8/92018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 018-015-4 8/92018 Transaction Date 8212018 $0.00 In Balance MISC PLANNING SVCS JULY 2018 MOUND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2040 PLANNING SVCS JULY 2018 SURFSIDE PARK MASATER PLAN - PLANNING SVCS JULY 2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 72 KENNEDY AND GRAVEN _ Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs ADMINISTRATIVE LEGAL SVCS JULY 2018 Invoice 143987 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-41600-316 Legal P & I PLANNING LEGAL SVCS JULY 2018 Invoice 143987 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-41600-300 Professional Srvs EXECUTIVE- LEGAL SVCS JULY 2018- TJG PREPARE FOR & ATTEND COUNCIL MTG Invoice 143987 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 4837 BEDFORD RD HAZARDOUS BLDG ABATEMENT LEGAL SVCS JULY 2018 Invoice 143987 7/312018 Cash Payment G 101-23413 5862 BARTLETT BLVD HAZ 5862 BARTLETT BLVD HAZARDOUS BLDG ABATEMENT LEGAL SVCS JULY 2018 Invoice 143987 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Due 12/312015 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $7,865.89 $7,865.89 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $7,865.89 Total $7,865.89 08/23/18 11:48 AM Page 1 $796.83 $402.89 $4,461.17 $5,660.89 $960.00 $855.00 $300.00 $60.00 $30.00 $2.205.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Batch Name B&M#7-2018 User Dollar Amt $93,129.63 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $93,129.63 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 BOLTON AND MENK INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 675-49425-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220984 7/312018 Cash Payment E 401-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220981 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 2 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220985 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220977 7/312018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220977 7/312018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220977 7/312018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0220986 7/312018 Cash Payment E 401-43135-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220982 7/312018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220983 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 3 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 401-43146-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220965 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 4 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0220969 7/312018 Cash Payment E 401-43117-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220966 7/312018 WCAADMINISTRATION-STORM WATER MGMT ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 MSA SYSTEM COORDINATION UPDATES ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 1 $159.00 $192.00 $351.00 WATER WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN $420.00 ENGINEERING SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 132018 GIS UPDATES ENG SVC JUNE 16, THRU $476.00 JULY 13 2018 GIS UPDATES ENG SVC JUNE 16, THRU $476.00 JULY 13 2018 GIS UPDATES ENG SVC JUNE 16, THRU $476.00 JULY 13 2018 2015 WILSHIRE BLVD TRUNK WATERMAIN $1,844.50 IMPROV PROJ PW 15-11 ENG SVC JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1511 2015 TUXEDO BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ ENG $672.00 SVC JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 PW 15-01 Project PW1502 WATER SUPPLY PLAN UPDATE ENG SVCS $128.00 JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,492.50 2016 CYPRESS-MAYWOOD STREET IMPROV $640.00 PROJ PW 16-03 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1603 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $640.00 2017 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 17-05 $5,570.00 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1705 2017 LYNWOOD BLVD STREET IMPROV $10,749.50 PROJ PW 17-01 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1701 -1512- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 401-43137-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220968 7/312018 Cash Payment E 401-43147-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220967 7/312018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0220970 7/312018 Cash Payment E 401-43110-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220971 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 5 BOLTON AND MENK INCORPORA Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220976 7/312018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220976 7/312018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220976 7/312018 Cash Payment E 401-43118-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220975 7/312018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 0220973 7/312018 Cash Payment E 401-43110-303 Engineering Fees Invoice 0220974 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 6 BOLTON AND MENK, INCORPORA Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220979 7/312018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220979 7/312018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs Invoice 0220979 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 7 BOLTON AND MENK. INCORPORA 2017 WILSHIRE/MAYWOOD STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 17-02 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1702 2017 TUXEDO BLVD PHASE III STREET IMPROV PROJ PW 17-03 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1703 2017 SAN SEWER & MANHOLE REHAB PROJ 17-06- ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1706 2017 RETAINING WALL IMPROV PROJ PW 17-04 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1704 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 2 $12,473.50 $2,625.00 $384.00 $115.00 $31.917.00 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS JUNE 16, $1,024.33 THRU JULY 13 2018 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS JUNE 16, $1,024.33 THRU JULY 13 2018 GENERAL ENGINEERING SVCS JUNE 16, $1,024.34 THRU JULY 13 2018 2018 WESTEDGE BLVD ST IMPROV PROJ $32,949.13 PW 18-01 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 132018 Project PW1801 2018 LIFT STATION IMPROV PROJ PW 18-03 $10,857.50 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1803 2018 RETAINING WALL IMPROV POROJ $448.00 PW18-02 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Project PW1802 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $47,327.63 MCES LS #38 WESTEDGE FORCEMAIN $146.84 ENGINEERING SVCS APRIL 7, THRU MAY 18 2018 MCES LS #38 WESTEDGE FORCEMAIN $146.83 ENGINEERING SVCS APRIL 7, THRU MAY 18 2018 MCES LS #38 WESTEDGE FORCEMAIN $146.83 ENGINEERING SVCS APRIL 7, THRU MAY 18 2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $440.50 -1513- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 101-42400-300 Professional Srvs 2018 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Invoice 0220972 7/312018 Cash Payment E 475-46386-300 Professional Srvs MOUND HARBOR RENAISSANCE Invoice 0220978 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 REDEVELOPMENT PROJ TIF 1-3 ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 8 BOLTON AND MENK INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-300 Professional Srvs MCES LS #39 & INTERCEPT REPLACEMENT PROJ -ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Invoice 0220980 7/312018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-300 Professional Srvs MCES LS #39 & INTERCEPT REPLACEMENT PROJ -ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Invoice 0220980 7/312018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs MCES LS #39 & INTERCEPT REPLACEMENT PROJ -ENG SVCS JUNE 16, THRU JULY 13 2018 Invoice 0220980 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $1,877.50 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $60,864.13 475 TIF 1-3 Mound Harbor Renaissan $7,654.00 601 WATER FUND $4,078.00 602 SEWER FUND $18,497.00 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $159.00 $93,129.63 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $93,129.63 Total $93,129.63 -1514- 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 3 $192.00 $7,654.00 $7,846.00 $38.33 $38.34 $38.33 $115.00 Batch Name 082818CITY Payments CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 User Dollar Amt $51,269.89 Computer Dollar Amt $51,269.89 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 3D SPECIALTIES _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-218 Clothing and Uniforms 8 YELLOW SAFETY T-SHIRTS- PARKS DEPT Invoice 204215 8/162018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 2 BIFFS, INC PORTABLE RESTROO Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W689833 8/152018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W689830 8/152018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W689831 8/152018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) Invoice W689832 8/152018 Transaction Date 8212018 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 1 $176.85 $176.85 PHILBROOK PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 7- $89.00 18-18 THRU 8-14-18 $81.31 CENTERVIEW BEACH BIFFS RENTAL & SVC $379.00 7- 18-18 THRU 8-14-18 $326.34 MOUND BAY PARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 7- $533.00 18-18 THRU 8-14-18 SKATEPARK BIFFS RENTAL & SVC 7- 18-18 $253.00 THRU 8-14-18 $64.33 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,254.00 Refer 3 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-202 Duplicating and copying AUGUST 2018- COPIER RENTAL- FIRE DEPT $31.75 Invoice 19111928 8/142018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $31.75 Refer 4 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Cash Payment E 101-41930-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 082818 8/92018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 082818 8/92018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 082818 8/92018 Cash Payment E 101-41910-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 082818 8/92018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 082818 8/92018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 082818 8/92018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-383 Gas Utilities Invoice 082818 8/92018 Transaction Date 8212018 GAS SVC 6-21-18 TO 7-19-18 $14.35 GAS SVC 6-21-18 TO 7-19-18 $81.31 GAS SVC 6-21-18 TO 7-19-18- DEPOT BLDG $34.88 GAS SVC 6-21-18 TO 7-19-18 $326.34 GAS SVC 6-21-18 TO 7-19-18 $55.34 Project 18-3 GAS SVC 6-21-18 TO 7-19-18 $28.51 GAS SVC 6-21-18 TO 7-19-18 $64.33 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 5 CUMMINS INC. _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-404 Machinery/Equip Repairs SVC CALL -DIAGNOSTIC- ON BACK UP GENERATOR B-3 SINCLAIR Invoice E4-37643 8/32018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 6 DPC INDUSTRIES, INC. -1515- Total $605.06 $530.00 Total $530.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-227 Chemicals Invoice DE82000077-18 7/312018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 7 DURKIN, DAVID Cash Payment E 401-43110-500 Capital Outlay FA Invoice 082818 8/102018 Transaction Date 8212018 150# CHLORINE CYLINDER RENTAL Wells Fargo 10100 Total TEAR DOWN -HAUL EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALL @ WINDSOR RD- INSTALL MODULAR WALL- 2018 RETAINING WALL PROJECT PW 2018- PW 18-02 Project PW1802 Wells Fargo 10100 Total 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 2 $90.00 $90.00 $2,150.00 $2.150.00 Refer 48 EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. _ Cash Payment E 370-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2018 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE $680.00 REPORTING & COUNTY AUDITOR FEES Invoice 77611 8/72018 Cash Payment E 371-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2018 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE $680.00 REPORTING & COUNTY AUDITOR FEES Invoice 77611 8/72018 Cash Payment E 310-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2018 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE $680.00 REPORTING & COUNTY AUDITOR FEES Invoice 77611 8/72018 Cash Payment E 311-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2018 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE $680.00 REPORTING & COUNTY AUDITOR FEES Invoice 77611 8/72018 Cash Payment E 312-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2018 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE $680.00 REPORTING & COUNTY AUDITOR FEES Invoice 77611 8/72018 Cash Payment E 313-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees 2018 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE $675.00 REPORTING & COUNTY AUDITOR FEES Invoice 77611 8/72018 Cash Payment E 355-47000-620 Fiscal Agent s Fees MOUND HRA- 2018 CONTINUING $500.00 DISCLOSURE REPORTING Invoice 77580 8/72018 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,575.00 Refer 8 ELECTRIC PUMP, INC _ Cash Payment E 602-49450-440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL FLOWMETER & CONTROL PANEL $1,718.58 BARTLETT E2 LIFT STATION Invoice 0063407 8/72018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,718.58 Refer 32 FIRE SAFETY USA, INCORPORATE _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair ENGINE #24 CHECK TRANSMISSION $302.10 OPERATION- INSPECT ELECTRIC PUMP SHIFTER & LINKAGE -NOT ENGAGED - REALIGNED Invoice 112560 5/312018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair LADDER #44 UNTANGLE CHAIN JAMMED IN $598.50 REEL- REALIGN W/ MOTOR- STEM BROKEN OFF BALL VALVE- ORDER NEW Invoice 112216 5/312018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-409 Other Equipment Repair E -ONE T44- REPLACE FRONT JUMP LINE $278.37 BLOWOUT VALVE AND 90 DEGREE AIR LINE FITTING Invoice 113323 6292018 -1516- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 3 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,178.97 Refer 50 GRAINGER _ $4,630.00 Cash Payment E 602-49450-220 Repair/Maint Supply UTILITY PUMP 12VDC, FORK LATCH STEEL $91.59 Invoice 082818 8/152018 BITS Cash Payment Invoice 806495842 8/172018 Project PW1801 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $91.59 Refer 9 GREEN WITH ENVY LAWN CARE, 1 _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-440 Other Contractual Servic WEED CONTROL- SPRAY CITY SIDEWALKS $935.00 Invoice 250304 8/162018 CLAMPS TO ADD ELECTRIC OUTLET FOR Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $935.00 Refer 10 HEALTH PARTNERS CLINICS _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-305 Medical Services DOT EXAM & PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL $170.00 EXAM -N. SPRENGELER Invoice 900037848 8/92018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $170.00 Refer 51 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING, INC. _ Cash Payment Cash Payment E 401-43118-300 Professional Srvs 2018 STREET IMPROV PROJ -INSTALL $4,630.00 INSPECTIONS - K. KELLY- 7-02-18 THRU 7- WATER SVC FROM CURB STOP TO METER 24-18 Invoice 082818 8/152018 2961 WESTEDGE BLVD J. NORDBERG Cash Payment Invoice 15182 8/92018 Project PW1801 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,630.00 Refer 33 HOME DEPOT CREDIT (FIRE) _ Cash Payment E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance PVC PIPE, PLUGS, ADAPTERS, OUTLET, $66.42 CLAMPS TO ADD ELECTRIC OUTLET FOR ICE MACHINE -REHAB TRAILER- FIRE DEPT Invoice 0576524 8/162018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance CREDIT RETURN- PLUG, ADAPTER, -$27.23 OUTLET- FIRE DEPT Invoice 7202025 8/192018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $39.19 Refer 11 HOME DEPOT/GECF (PW _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies STEEL U POSTS, WOOOD TRANSFER $167.27 SHOVELS- 3 QTY, MITER DISCS, GOO GONE SPRAY GEL- STREETS DEPT Invoice 3073975 8/32018 Cash Payment E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies PINE BOARD- 1X8 8' $17.61 Invoice 9020036 8/172018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $184.88 Refer 46 KELLY, KEVIN _ Cash Payment E 281-45210-331 Use of personal auto REIMS MILEAGE- DOCK PROGRAM $22.29 INSPECTIONS - K. KELLY- 7-02-18 THRU 7- 24-18 Invoice 082818 8/152018 Cash Payment E 101-41410-331 Use of personal auto REIMS MILEAGE- ELECTIONS- PRIMARY & $19.78 POLLING PLACE SET-UP - K. KELLY- 8-07-18 THRU 8- 14-18 Invoice 082818 8/152018 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $42.07 Refer 52 LAKE RESTORATION, INC. _ -1517- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 4 Cash Payment E 675-49425-440 Other Contractual Servic PARKING DECK POND -TOTAL CARE ULTRA $170.00 PROGRAM OPTION- WEED CONTROL - APPLICATION #4 Invoice 183177 8/172018 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $170.00 Refer 12 LAND EQUIPMENT, INCORPORAT _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply SEALS, O -RINGS, ADAPTER, BALL, $121.48 SLEEVES, WASHER,S- REPAIR SUPPLIES - PARKS Invoice 03-579449 8/62018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $121.48 Refer 13 LOFFLER COMPANIES, INCORPOR _ Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - COLOR $191.77 OVERAGE- 7-14-18 THRU 8-13-18 Invoice 2878603 8/72018 Cash Payment E 101-41930-202 Duplicating and copying COPY ROOM KONICA C652 - B & W $103.73 OVERAGE- 7-14-18 THRU 8-13-18 Invoice 2878603 8/72018 Cash Payment E 602-49450-202 Duplicating and copying KONICA MINOLTA B200 PW COPIER $2.77 OVERAGE CHG 7-10-18 THRU 8-09-18 Invoice 2876696 8/32018 Project 18-3 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $298.27 Refer 47 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH _ Cash Payment R 601-49400-37170 State fee- Water 3RD QTR 2018 COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY $5,752.00 SVC CONNECTION FEE Invoice 082818 8/152018 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $5,752.00 Refer 14 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT-(SCHAR _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply CHAINS- PARKS $76.22 Invoice P71513 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-220 Repair/Maint Supply ATV TUBE- PARKS GATOR $22.85 Invoice P71995 8/132018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $99.07 Refer 15 MINNESOTA VALLEY TESTING LA _ Cash Payment E 401-43118-300 Professional Srvs 2018 STREET PROJECT WATER SUPPLY $135.00 TESTING- CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM WATER TESTS Invoice 933113 8/152018 Project PW1801 Cash Payment E 401-43118-300 Professional Srvs 2018 STREET PROJECT WATER SUPPLY $95.00 TESTING- CHLORINE REPORT & COLIFORM WATER TESTS -10 Invoice 932985 8/142018 Project PW1801 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $230.00 Refer 16 MOUND MARKETPLACE ASSOC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-412 Building Rentals SEPTEMBER 2018 COMMON AREA MTCE & $1,315.32 INSURANCE HWS Invoice 090118 9/12018 Transaction Date 8/102018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,315.32 Refer 17 MULCH STORE, THE _ -1518- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008344 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008378 8/12018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008426 8/12018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008722 8/72018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008723 8/72018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008740 8/72018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008799 8/82018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008826 8/92018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008837 8/92018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-232 Landscape Material Invoice 104008861 8/92018 Transaction Date 8212018 WOODCHIPS- 4 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 4 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 4 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 5 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 3 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 5 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 5 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 5 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 5 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS WOODCHIPS- 3 CUBIC YARDS- PARKS Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 19 NEWMAN SIGNS, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials SIGN MATERIALS- SHEETED BLANK, STD PUNCH -STREETS Invoice 004632 8/132018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 21 OFFICE DEPOT (FIRE) Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 174798152001 8/12018 PO 24931 Cash Payment E 222-42260-200 Office Supplies Invoice 174800289001 8/12018 PO 24931 Cash Payment E 222-42260-219 Safety supplies Invoice 174798152001 8/12018 PO 24931 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 20 OFFICE DEPOT Cash Payment E 101-41930-200 Office Supplies Invoice 174764802001 8/22018 PO 25031 Cash Payment E 609-49750-200 Office Supplies Invoice 180198331001 8/82018 PO 23454 Transaction Date 8202018 Refer 22 ORONO, CITY OF Cash Payment E 101-41600-450 Board of Prisoners Invoice 20141169 8/102018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 23 RAYS SERVICES COPY PAPER, LASER LABELS, 3 FLEX VIEW 1" BINDERS, RUBBERBANDS- FIRE DEPT 3 POLY 1/5" BINDERS- FIRE DEPT 5 BOXES AA BATTERIES FIRE DEPT Wells Fargo 10100 Total 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 5 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $25.00 $15.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $15.00 $215.00 $384.21 $384.21 $114.44 $17.37 $33.35 $165.16 SELF INK STAMP- N. IVERSON- INITIALS $17.99 LAMINATING POUCHES-CARDSTOCK- HWS $132.46 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $150.45 HENNEP CTY JAIL CHARGES- PER DIEM $300.00 FEES JULY 2018 Wells Fargo 10100 -1519- Total $300.00 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal Invoice 073118 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal Invoice 073118 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal Invoice 073118 7/312018 Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal Invoice 081018 8/102018 Transaction Date 8212018 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 REMOVAL OF LARGE STUMP-CHAPMAN PLACE & HAUL AWAY TRIM LARGE OAK OVER POWER LINE & CLEANUP @ 4731 CARLOW REMOVE 2 LARGE MAPLE TREES - EMERGENCY TREES -ROTTEN & READY TO FALL NEAR ROANOKE- HAUL AWAY REMOVAL OF LARGE OAK TREE- NEAR HOUSE -SLED WIRES - HAUL AWAY Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 34 SPORTACULAR, INC. _ Cash Payment E 101-43100-218 Clothing and Uniforms SCREEN PRINT CITY LOGO ON LEFT CHEST OF 4 T-SHIRTS & 4 SAFETY VESTS- NEW STREETS DEPT STAFF Invoice 8078 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 24 SUN PATRIOT NEWSPAPER -CITY Cash Payment E 355-47000-351 Legal Notices Publishing 2017 ANNUAL TIF DISCLOSURE -PUBLIC NOTICE- PUB 8-11-18 Invoice 623062 8/112018 Cash Payment E 375-47200-351 Legal Notices Publishing 2017 ANNUAL TIF DISCLOSURE -PUBLIC NOTICE- PUB 8-11-18 Invoice 623062 8/112018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 25 TONKA PLUMBING HEATING & CL _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL NEW 3/4" METER & ADAPTERS & NEW SHUT OFF VALVES- 5846 IDLEWOOD RD- 8-03-18 Invoice 10250 8/92018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL NEW 3/4" METER & ADAPTERS & NEW SHUT OFF VALVES- 2920 TUXEDO BLVD- 8-03-18 Invoice 10250 8/92018 Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic INSTALL NEW 3/4" METER & ADAPTERS & NEW SHUT OFF VALVES- 5759 LYNWOOD BLVD- 8-06-18 Invoice 10259 8/142018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 27 TRUE TREE SOLUTIONS Cash Payment E 101-45200-533 Tree Removal Invoice 082818 8202018 Transaction Date 8212018 Refer 26 UHL COMPANY REMOVE MAPLE TREE -HAUL AWAY @ 2901 CAMBRIDGE LN Wells Fargo 10100 Total Cash Payment E 101-41930-400 Repairs & Maintenance REPLACE BURNT OUT CONDENSER FAN MOTOR ON RTU #2 7-10-18 Invoice 7825 8/132018 -1520- 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 6 $685.00 $500.00 $2,250.00 $2,450.00 $5,885.00 $32.00 $32.00 $42.40 $42.41 $84.81 $368.00 $368.00 $348.00 $1,084.00 $2,137.50 $2,137.50 $478.77 CITY OF MOUND Payments Refer 28 ULINE Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies BULK SOAP DISPENSERS- CITRUS BLOSSOM AIRFRESH SPRAY Invoice 100048819 8/72018 Transaction Date 8202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 29 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies KILLZALL SUPER CONCENTRATE - WEED KILLER- PARKS Invoice 48928 8/72018 Transaction Date 8202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 30 VESSCO, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER PARTS- ELBOW, COUPLING, NIPPLE, UNION Invoice 73527 6282018 Transaction Date 8202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 31 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic RELOCATE WATERMAIN @ FOR POOL CANARY & DOVE LN - 8-16-18 Invoice 4499 8/162018 Transaction Date 2202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - 1521 - 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 7 i $478.77 $197.36 $197.36 $1,352.26 $188.14 $188.14 $96.98 $96.98 $10.30 $10.30 $12,795.00 $12,795.00 Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance REPLACE BURNT OUT CONDENSER FAN MOTOR ON RTU #2 7-10-18 Invoice 7825 8/132018 Cash Payment E 101-41930-400 Repairs & Maintenance REPLACE BURNT OUT CONDENSER FAN MOTOR ON RTU #2 7-10-18 Invoice 6469 8/132018 Cash Payment E 222-42260-402 Building Maintenance PERFORM OPERATIONAL CHECK ON RTU -1 & RTU -2 COOLING CIRCUITS- CONFIGURE ON/OFF CONTROL ON TSTAT IN FIRE GARAGE- 6-14-18 - INSTALLED NEW ECONOMIZER ACTUATOR- RECONFIGURE & REWIRE 7-2-18 Invoice 6469 8/132018 Transaction Date 8212018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 28 ULINE Cash Payment E 101-41910-210 Operating Supplies BULK SOAP DISPENSERS- CITRUS BLOSSOM AIRFRESH SPRAY Invoice 100048819 8/72018 Transaction Date 8202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 29 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE _ Cash Payment E 101-45200-210 Operating Supplies KILLZALL SUPER CONCENTRATE - WEED KILLER- PARKS Invoice 48928 8/72018 Transaction Date 8202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 30 VESSCO, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-210 Operating Supplies WATER PARTS- ELBOW, COUPLING, NIPPLE, UNION Invoice 73527 6282018 Transaction Date 8202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 31 WIDMER CONSTRUCTION, LLC _ Cash Payment E 601-49400-440 Other Contractual Servic RELOCATE WATERMAIN @ FOR POOL CANARY & DOVE LN - 8-16-18 Invoice 4499 8/162018 Transaction Date 2202018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total - 1521 - 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 7 i $478.77 $197.36 $197.36 $1,352.26 $188.14 $188.14 $96.98 $96.98 $10.30 $10.30 $12,795.00 $12,795.00 CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Fund Summary Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $51,269.89 Total $51,269.89 -1522- 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 8 10100 Wells Fargo 101 GENERAL FUND $13,629.41 222 AREA FIRE SERVICES $2,172.51 281 COMMONS DOCKS FUND $22.29 310 GO IMPROVEMENT -2013A $680.00 311 GO BONDS -2014A $680.00 312 2015A $8,380,000 GO BONDS $680.00 313 2016 IMPROVEMENTS $675.00 355 2003-C G.O. TIF 1-2 $542.40 370 2011A REFUNDING BONDS $680.00 371 GO REFUNDING, 2012B $680.00 375 TIF 1-3 Debt Service $42.41 401 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS $7,010.00 601 WATER FUND $19,731.30 602 SEWER FUND $2,398.28 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $1,476.29 675 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $170.00 $51,269.89 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated bythe Computer $51,269.89 Total $51,269.89 -1522- 08/23/18 11:49 AM Page 8 CITY OF MOUND 08/23/1811: 50 AM Page 1 Payments Current Period: August 2018 Batch Name 0828HWS User Dollar Amt $104,253.82 Payments Computer Dollar Amt $104,253.82 $0.00 In Balance Refer 1 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $525.50 Invoice 3283468 8/92018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $349.50 Invoice 3285219 8/162018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$49.00 Invoice 430137 7/302018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $826.00 Refer 4 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $88.00 Invoice 0065594900 8/172018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.55 Invoice 0065594900 8/172018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $562.90 Invoice 0065490800 8/102018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $10.25 Invoice 0065490800 8/102018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $320.50 Invoice 0065594700 8/172018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $5.10 Invoice 0065490800 8/172018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $112.00 Invoice 0065490700 8/102018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.21 Invoice 0065490700 8/102018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,103.51 Refer 3 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,461.45 Invoice 0065507700 8/132018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $755.75 Invoice 0065610300 8202018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$181.00 Invoice 0065612400 8202018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $3,036.20 Refer 2 BELLBOY CORPORATION _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-210 Operating Supplies SUPPLIES - UPC SHELF STRIPS $54.00 Invoice 0098077500 8/102018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $19.99 Invoice 0098123300 8202018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R SUPPLIES - C -FOLD TOWELS $28.00 Invoice 0098118900 8/172018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $101.99 Refer 5 BENT BREWSTILLERY _ -1523- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 005625 8/142018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 6 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 445497 8/152018 Invoice 446812 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 445498 8/152018 $810.00 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT Invoice 445499 8/152018 $7,209.67 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 7 BERNICKS BEVERAGES AND VEN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 446811 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER Invoice 446812 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 8 BLU SKY PUBLISHING Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising Invoice 17347 8202018 Transaction Date 8222018 Total Total Total 1/4 PAGE AD SEPTEMBER 2018 BALANCE MN MAGAZINE Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 9 BOURGET IMPORTS, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 153437 8/162018 $52.80 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 153437 8/162018 $810.00 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 10 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN BEE $7,209.67 08/23/18 11:50 AM Page 2 $48.84 $48.84 $47.60 $466.85 -$29.60 $484.85 $87.60 $1,181.00 $1,268.60 $180.00 $180.00 $264.00 $4.50 Total $268.50 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $8,417.40 Invoice 1090896407 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $52.80 Invoice 1090896408 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $810.00 Invoice 1090898143 8/172018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $7,209.67 Invoice 1090899410 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $16,489.87 Refer 11 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,610.00 Invoice 1080843939 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,329.46 Invoice 1080843938 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE CREDIT -$48.00 Invoice 2080208968 8/72018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$170.83 Invoice 2080208054 7242018 -1524- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 08/23/18 11:50 AM Page 3 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $74.00 Invoice 1080843940 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $865.82 Invoice 1080847207 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $3,629.64 Invoice 1080847206 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $10,290.09 Refer 13 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $2,797.05 Invoice 2146984 8/142018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $22.35 Invoice 2146985 8/142018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,819.40 Refer 12 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES, L.P. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $4,084.15 Invoice 2150293 8212018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $53.85 Invoice 2150294 8212018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER CREDIT -$27.70 Invoice 2150296 8212018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,110.30 Refer 14 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $307.00 Invoice 130-2005 8/162018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $307.00 Refer 15 COCA COLA BOTTLING -MIDWEST Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa COCA COLA PRODUCTS- MIX $511.92 Invoice 3595207961 8202018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $511.92 Refer 16 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $917.00 Invoice 1371085 8212018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $917.00 Refer 17 GRAPE BEGINNINGS, INCORPORA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $153.00 Invoice 00044083 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.25 Invoice 00044083 8/152018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $155.25 Refer 18 GROWLER MAGAZINE _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-340 Advertising 1/16 PAGE AD -HWS- AUGUST 2018 ISSUE $342.00 Invoice 1142-R 8/12018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $342.00 Refer 19 HAMMERHEART BREWING COMP _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $115.50 Invoice 2018-499 8/152018 -1525- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 08/23/18 11:50 AM Page 4 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $115.50 Refer 20 HOHENSTEINS, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $689.80 Invoice 980435 8/92018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $95.12 Invoice 981811 8/162018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $784.92 Refer 21 INBOUND BREWCO _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $1,369.60 Invoice 2381 8/132018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,369.60 Refer 43 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $49.90 Invoice 2880410 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $33.85 Invoice 2880410 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $5,957.20 Invoice 2880409 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,040.95 Refer 22 JJ TAYLOR. DISTRIBUTING MINN _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $3,992.05 Invoice 2868156 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $55.35 Invoice 2868157 8/152018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $4,047.40 Refer 23 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $186.00 Invoice 1082072 8/162018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$24.00 Invoice 692238 7242018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT -$8.92 Invoice 692237 7242018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $153.08 Refer 24 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $13,517.56 Invoice 1080716 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $5,250.45 Invoice 1080717 8/152018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $18,768.01 Refer 44 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $2,892.30 Invoice 1086120 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $686.90 Invoice 1086121 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,576.93 Invoice 1086119 8222018 -1526- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 08/23/18 11:50 AM Page 5 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $6,156.13 Refer 25 LUPULIN BREWING COMPANY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $63.00 Invoice 14202 8/92018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $63.00 Refer 26 MARLIN S TRUCKING DELIVERY _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 8-02-18 $290.00 Invoice 34526 8/22018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 8-09-18 $339.30 Invoice 34559 8/92018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight DELIVERY SVC 8-13-18 $30.45 Invoice 34570 8/132018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $659.75 Refer 29 MODIST BREWING CO. LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-252 Beer For Resale BEER $120.00 Invoice 10839 8/152018 Transaction Date 8232018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $120.00 Refer 28 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $174.00 Invoice 20816 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $4.50 Invoice 20816 8/152018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $178.50 Refer 27 PAUSTIS AND SONS WINE COMPA _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $913.75 Invoice 20435 8/132018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $12.50 Invoice 20435 8/132018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $600.00 Invoice 21163 8202018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $8.75 Invoice 21163 8202018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,535.00 Refer 45 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,067.55 Invoice 2410410 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $796.00 Invoice 2410411 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $64.00 Invoice 2410412 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $1,927.55 Refer 30 PHILLIPS WINE AND SPIRITS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $1,399.25 Invoice 2406555 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,368.85 Invoice 2406556 8/152018 -1527- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 08/23/18 11:50 AM Page 6 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R $72.00 Invoice 2406557 8/152018 Invoice 1721070 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR CREDIT Transaction Date 8222018 -$3.96 Invoice 301359 7242018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $135.00 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $2,836.14 Refer 31 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION CO. INC _ 8/162018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $36.00 Invoice K-35436095 8/132018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $36.00 Refer 32 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $247.80 Invoice 2271976 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.00 Invoice 2271976 8/152018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $249.80 Refer 34 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $305.30 Invoice 2273432 8/182018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.00 Invoice 2273432 8/182018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $307.30 Refer 33 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE $176.61 Invoice 2270422 8/112018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT $2.00 Invoice 2270422 8/112018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $178.61 Refer 35 SHAMROCK GROUP, INC. _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R ICE Invoice 2276609 8222018 Invoice 1721070 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 2276609 8222018 LIQUOR Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total Refer 36 SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-255 Misc Merchandise For R WINE SPECTATOR PUBLICATIONS 8-31-18 EDITION Invoice S0646024 7/172018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Total $15.00 $169.26 $2.00 $171.26 $15.00 Refer 37 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS OF M _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $1,768.00 Invoice 1721070 8232018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR $2,854.75 Invoice 1721069 8232018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX $135.00 Invoice 1721071 8232018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE $384.00 Invoice 1718473 8/162018 -1528- CITY OF MOUND Payments Current Period: August 2018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 1718472 8/162018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 38 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0212894 8/92018 Cash Payment Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0212894 8/92018 Invoice 80239 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 0212895 8/92018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0212895 8/92018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo Refer 39 VINOCOPIA, INCORPORATED _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-251 Liquor For Resale LIQUOR Invoice 0213364 8/162018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0213364 8/162018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 0213363 8/162018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight FREIGHT Invoice 0213363 8/162018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo Refer 40 WINE COMPANY Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 79542 8/92018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 79542 8/92018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale Invoice 80239 8/162018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-265 Freight Invoice 80239 8/162018 Transaction Date 8222018 Total 10100 Total 10100 WINE FREIGHT WINE FREIGHT Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 41 WINE MERCHANTS _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7197191 8222018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 7196176 8/152018 Cash Payment E 609-49750-254 Soft Drinks/Mix For Resa MIX Invoice 7197192 8222018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 Refer 42 WRS IMPORTS, LLC _ Cash Payment E 609-49750-253 Wine For Resale WINE Invoice 1656 8/92018 Transaction Date 8222018 Wells Fargo 10100 -1529- Total Total 08/23/18 11:50 AM Page 7 $5,472.23 $10,613.98 $797.92 $9.00 $120.00 $9.00 $935.92 $234.00 $2.00 $184.00 $16.00 $436.00 $608.00 $13.20 $800.00 $9.90 $1,431.10 $585.00 $1,075.00 $46.00 Total $1,706.00 $156.00 Total $156.00 CITY OF MOUND 08/23/1811: 50 AM Page 8 Payments Current Period: August 2018 Fund Summary 10100 Wells Fargo 609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND $104,253.82 $104,253.82 Pre -Written Checks $0.00 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $104,253.82 Total $104,253.82 -1530- MOUND CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 15, 2018 The City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota, met in rescheduled regular session on Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers of the Centennial Building. Members present: Mayor Mark Wegscheid, Council Members Kelli Gillispie, Jeff Bergquist and Ray Salazar, and Jennifer Peterson Members absent: None Others present: City Manager Eric Hoversten, Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Administrative Assistant Rebecca Kress, and Paul Bergquist. Consent agenda: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine in nature by the Council. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event it will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in normal sequence. 1. Open meeting Mayor Wegscheid called the meeting to order at 8:50 p.m. 2. Pledae of Alleaiance 3. Approve Agenda, with any amendments City Manager Eric Hoversten said that items 4E, 4F, & 4G were awaiting bid response and analysis. These items were distributed electronically previous to the meeting. Item 4E has replacement pages 1475-1475.1 and page 1476 which is resolution to approve rewarding of the Crack Seal contract to Fahrner Asphalt Company for $8,786.00. Item 4F is a resolution awarding the Seal Coat contract to Allied Blacktop Company for $130,429.75 and those are replacement pages 1477-1477.1 and 1478 is the resolution. Lastly, Item 4G is a resolution awarding manhole inspection contract to Hydro-Klean in the amount of $154,723.58 and those are replacement pages 1479, 1479.1, and 1480 is the resolution. MOTION made by Salazar, seconded by Bergquist, to approve the agenda with amendments. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 4. Consent Agenda MOTION made by Salazar, seconded by Peterson, to approve the consent agenda. Upon roll call vote, all voted in favor. Motion carried. A. Approve payment of claims in the amount of $627,214.18. B. Approve minutes: July 24, 2018 Regular Meeting C. RESOULTION NO. 18-79: RESOLUTION OFOPPOSITION FROM THE CITY OF MOUND FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY ORDINANCE NUMBER THIRTEEN - RECYCLING D. RESOLUTION NO. 18-80: RESOLUTION APPROVING PERMITS FOR THE 2018 OUR LADY OF THE LAKE INCREDIBLE FESTIVAL TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 21-24,2018, WITH WAIVED MUSICAL CONCERT PERMIT FEE MUSICAL CONCERT PERMIT (INCLUDING EXTENDED TIME FOR MUSIC UNTIL 11:00 P.M.) -1531 - Mound City Council Minutes —August 15, 2018 2. SEASONAL BANNER AND PORTABLE SIGN PERMIT (INCLUDING EXTENDED TIMEFRAME FOR SIGN PLACEMENT) 3. 1 TO 4 DAY TEMPORARY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE E. RESOLUTION NO. 18-81: RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2018 CRACK SEAL CONTRACT PW -18-07 TO FAHRNER ASPHALT COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,786.00 F. RESOLUTION NO. 18-82: RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2018 SEAL COAT CONTRACT PW -18-07 TO ALLIED BLACKTOP COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $130,429.75 G. RESOLUTION NO. 18-83: RESOLUTION AWARDING THE 2018 SEWER AND MANHOLE CLEANING AND INSPECTION CONTRACT PW -18-04 TO HYDRO- KLEAN INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $154,723.58 AND AMERICAN ENVIRONMENTAL LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $227,552.00 H. Approve Pay Request #4 for the 2017 Lift Station Replacement Project in the amount of $27,411.30 to Widmer Construction PW -17-05 5. Comments and suggestions from citizens present on any item not on the agenda. None 6. Public Hearing to discuss and consider revocation of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Approved by Resolution No. 15-91 for Property at 2642 Commerce Boulevard Sarah Smith, Community Development Director, presented information to evaluate the CUP that allows boat sales, operation and rental activities at 2642 Commerce Boulevard. The CUP was outlined and officially adopted in a resolution at the Council meeting on August 11, 2015 and it is numbered at Resolution 15-91. The resolution allows for 4 boats to used for rental purposes and also requires 9 parking spaces to be maintained on the property for customers and employees. The original CUP was issued to Gekko Boats and it runs with the land and not the business. The property was sold 2016-2017 to Heinen's Motor Sports. The original contact for Heinen's was Kolin Heinen but Staff was notified in early July that the new contact for the business was Paul Heinen. Smith added that recent activities that were observed were considered to be heavy intensity on the property with excessive number of watercraft present, more than the 4 allowed under the CUP. The City notified the property owner in July of the conditions observed and noted if they wanted to request an amendment to the CUP to contact Staff to discuss those amendments but that they need to comply with the existing CUP in the meantime. Smith said that Staff had not received a favorable response to first 2 letters which warranted the Public Hearing. Smith said that Staff was contacted last week by Paul Bergquist who is now working cooperatively with Heinen's and is present this evening. Smith said the intensity has significantly decreased since meeting with Paul. Staff is not recommending any action at this time by the City Council, noting Staff is pleased at the response from the property owners. Gillispie asked Smith about ambiguity in CUP that was referenced. Smith said that there were a couple actions that took place when the CUP was amended, including eliminating a 72 hour restriction for boats and replacing it with the ability to store 4 boats on the property. Peterson asked if this review was driven by complaints. Smith confirmed that there were complaints brought to the Staffs attention in addition to the visible violations observed during Staff drive-by inspections. Salazar asked if there is indoor storage and asked if the 4 boat limit is just for the outdoor storage only and Smith said yes, the 4 boat limit is for outdoor storage only. -1532- Mound City Council Minutes —August 15, 2018 Mayor Wegscheid opened the Public Hearing at 9:07 p.m. Council member Bergquist stated that although he and Paul share the same name, they are in no way related and Paul Bergquist concurred. Mayor Wegscheid asked Paul Bergquist if he is now the person taking responsibility for the property in question. Bergquist stated that he owns Minnetonka Boat Rental and used to own the marina on Edgewater in Mound and that due to consequences from the recession, Bergquist moved into a different type of business, including servicing boats. Bergquist stated that he hopes the Heinen partnership will now bring high quality boats to this area. Salazar asked what kind of boats Bergquist has at his disposal. Bergquist said they have Tige Boats, which are a high quality ski boat and Coach pontoons. Mayor Wegscheid closed the Public Hearing at 9:13 p.m. MOTION made by Wegscheid, seconded by Salazar, to remand back to Staff to monitor and address as Staff sees fit. All voted in favor. Motion carried. 7. Information/Miscellaneous A. Comments/reports from Council members: Hoversten mentioned that on October 16 at 6:30 p.m. there will be a special meeting workshop, November 6 is the General Election, the December 25th meeting will be cancelled due to the Christmas Holiday. Mayor Wegscheid mentioned the Running of the Bays event on Sept 8th and Wegscheid also stated that he will not be running for re-election for Mayor. B. Reports: Bolton & Menk Engineering - June YTD Fire Department - July 2018 C. Minutes: D. Correspondence: Mediacom July 27, 2018 Equal Opportunity Employer 8. Adjourn MOTION made by Bergquist, seconded by Peterson, to adjourn at 9:15 p.m. All voted in favor. Motion carried. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mayor Mark Wegscheid -1533- Q& MLNK Real People. Real Solutions. August 23, 2018 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: 2018 Lift Station Improvement Project Wilshire Blvd. Sanitary Sewer Reroute City Project No. PW 18-03 & PW 18-05 Project No.: C17.115013 Dear Mr. Hoversten: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: (952) 448-8838 Fax: (952) 448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com Please find enclosed Pay Request No. 2 from Minger Construction for work completed on the 2018 Lift Station Improvement Project & Wilshire Blvd. Sanitary Sewer Reroute from June 19, 2018 through August 20, 2018. We have reviewed the contractor's request, verified quantities and recommend payment in the amount of $41,959.12 to Minger Construction. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brian D. Simmons, P.E. City Engineer H'.AMOONVC19115013\1 CocresVC ToOthers\2018-08-23 Pay Request Not Letter docs, Bolton & Monk is an DATE: 8121/2018 CONTRACTOR'S PAY REQUEST NO. 2 CONTRACTOR Minger Construction 2018 Lift Station Improvements and Wilshire Boulevard Sanitary Sewer Reroute OWNER City of Mound CITY PROJECT NO. PW -18-03 & PW -18-05 ENGINEER Bolton & Menk BMI PROJECT NO. C17.115013 FOR WORK COMPLETED FROM 7/17/2018 THROUGH 8/20/2018 TOTALAMOUNT BID ................. •..............................................._................................................................................. $ 283,161.00 APPROVED CHANGE ORDERS & EXTRA WORK............................................................................I........... $ 790.50 CURRENTCONTRACT AMOUNT.............................................................................................................. $ 283,951.50 TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK TO DATE........................................................................................................................... $ 126,936.20 TOTAL, STORED MATERIALS TO DATE....................................................................................................................... $ - DEDUCTION FOR STORED MATERIALS USED IN WORK COMPLETED............................................................. $ - TOTAL, COMPLETED WORK & STORED MATERIALS................................................................................................... $ 126,936.20 RETAINEDPERCENTAGE ( 5% )............................................................................................................. $ 6,346.81 TOTAL AMOUNT OF OTHER DEDUCTIONS.............................................................................................................. $ - NET AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR TO DATE........................................................................................................... $ 120,589.39 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID ON PREVIOUS ESTIMATES....................................................................................................... $ 78,630.27 PAY CONTRACTOR AS ESTIMATE NO. 2........................................................................................................................ $ 41,959.12 Certificate for Payment I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all items quantities and prices of work and material shown on this Estimate are correct and that all work has been performed in full accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract for this project between the Owner and the undersigned Contractor, and as amended by any authorized changes, and that the foregoing is a true and correct statement of the amount for the Final Estimate, that the provisions of M. S. 290.92 have been complied with and that all claims against me by reason of the Contract have been paid or satisfactorily secured. Contractor: Minger Construction Co. Inc. 620 Corporate Dr. Jordan, MN 55352 p �^ BY T f O,jeC,+ I' `Gp``W, Name Title Date g ( ?.,Z % Z0 1$ CHECKED AND APPROVED AS TO QUANTITIES AND AMOUNT: BOLTON & MENK, INC., ENGINEERS, 2638 SHADOW LN, SUITE 200, CHASKA MN 55318 �G By - CITY ENGINEER Brian D. Simmons Date 8/23/2018 APPROVED FOR PAYMENT: Owner: CITY OF MOUND By Name Title Date -1535- QBOLTON & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. August 23, 2018 Mr. Eric Hoversten, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 RE: Project related pay requests Dear Mr. Hoversten: 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Ph: 19521448-8838 Fax: 19521448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com Please find enclosed the following project related pay requests which have been reviewed and are in accordance with approved proposals for the 2017 Street Improvement project, and one emergency repair. I recommend payment of these requests. 1. Norling Landscapes, (total of $3,232.50), 2017 Street Reconstruction project — Tuxedo Blvd. Phase III & Lynwood Blvd., PW -17-01 & PW -17-03, $2,765.00 for tree replacement as part of retaining wall construction at 2077 Apple lane per approved proposal. $467.50 for landscape improvements at 4524 Tuxedo Blvd, per approved proposal 2. Klein Underground ($2,860.00), Emergency Repair, for repair of subsidence/sinkhole in Auditors road caused by the failure of a portion of the underground stormwater treatment system. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Brian D. Simmons, P.E. City Engineer Bolton & Menk is an '�ORLING'S Lake Minnetonka Landscapes, Inc. P. O. Box 361, Spring Park, MN 55384 Phone: 952-471-0255 FAX: 952-471-1181 BILL TO Bolton & Menk ATTN: Brian Simmons 2638 Shadow Lane Chaska, MN 55318 INVOICE DATE INVOICE # 7/30/2018 34217 I TERMS I JOB# I NET 30 I 8911 I QUANTITY I DESCRIl'TION I RATE I AMOUNT I Installation/Improvement to Real Property -Non-Taxable CITY OF MOUND TREE PLANTING - 2177 APPLE LANE (cost as quoted) Install (5) 7' height Black Hills Spruce Labor equipped with tools and truck 1.5% finance charge on balances over 30 days. Please write Job Number on check. -1537- 2,765.00 1 2,765.00 Total $2,765.00 '�ORLING'S Lake Minnetonka Landscapes, Inc. P. O. Box 361, Spring Park, MN 55384 Phone: 952-471-0255 FAX: 952-471-1181 BILL TO Bolton & Menk ATTN: Pat Schroepfer 2638 Shadow Lane Chaska, MN 55318 INVOICE DATE INVOICE # 8/14/2018 34245 TERMS I JOB# NET 30 I 8989 QUANTITY DESCRIl'TION RATE AMOUNT Landscape Service (Non -Taxable) CITY OF MOUND - 4524 Tuxedo - Enze Plant install (cost as quoted) Labor equipped with tools and truck 467.50 467.50 NOTE: Homeowner accepted irrigation responsibility 8/14/18 (phone) 1.5% finance charge on balances over 30 days.TotalI $467.50 Please write Job Number on check. -1538- Klein Underground, LLC P.O. Box 564 Invoice 77190 —� Howard Lake, MN 55349 (320) 286-5373 info@kleinunderground.com BILL TO Bolton & Menk DATE 08/09/2018 JOB LOCATION Auditors & Shoreline Dr, Mound DUE DATE 09/08/2018 ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT Concrete/Blacktop Sawing (Chg per Linear Ft.) 36' 36 3.75 135.00 Spoils Per Ton 9 9 20.00 180.00 Asphalt 306 SF 306 7.50 2,295.00 Paint Parking Lines 1 250.00 250.00 TOTAL DUE $2,860,00 THANK YOU -1539- LVA IA LVA [a]TL•\1pill LVA TO: City Council FROM: Rita Trapp & Laura Chamberlain, Consulting Planners Year Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 22, 2018 SUBJECT: Orono 2040 Comprehensive Plan Review and Comment MEETING DATE: August 28, 2018 City of Mound Staff and consultants reviewed Orono's draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/3]1/2040-Comprehensive-Plan) and found that there are no areas of concern for the City of Mound. Highlights, as summarized below, were presented to the Planning Commission at their August 21, 2018 meeting. As recommended by Staff, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to the City Council that no official comments were required from the City of Mound on the proposed 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan update. A draft resolution affirming that the City of Mound has no comment has been prepared for Council consideration and action. 2000 Plan Highlights Community Philosophy — ratherthan a vision statement, the Community Management Plan includes a series of Philosophies covering. Growth Management, Lake Minnetonka, Two Communities in One, Natural Resources and Social Amenities, Open Space, Institutional/Commercial Infill (see attached). • Historical and Forecasted Growth 1540- mill in We 3-2: Uouo PopWnriOu ]IomehaW, S Ctoploy�ol 1970 -2040 Year 1970 1980 199) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 PopWeMu 684± ]285 7538 ,'.437 8,AW 9,900 9, SCO Hmn'elnYk 2291 2,613 2,966 2,626 77/X3 i 360 3.900 Penom ge9omehoW L4'0 299 2]9 273 263 233 249 244 E�4opmeur 809 980 951 11370 1,555 1,635 1.700 Soww U.S. Ceovo', MetropoLpl05UMA 1540- 2040 City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Review — August 22, 2018 • Environmental Protection o Lake Minnetonka is the single most significant natural feature in Orono, and its protection and development are main focuses of the city. o The City is also focused on the protection of other surface water resources, particularly wetlands, when considering development and stormwater runoff. o Beyond water resources, the city is focused on preserving open space allowing for individuals access to sunlight and natural vegetation and habitats. • Land Use o Orono is designated by the Metropolitan Council as: • an Emerging Suburban Edge community - a community in the early stages of transitioning into urbanized levels of development—growth should be occurring at average densities of at least 3 to 5 units per acre. • a Rural Residential Community—developed with residential patterns characterized by large lots and no plans to provide urban infrastructure, such as centralized wastewater treatment—future development of rural residential patterns should be discouraged, allowing for, where appropriate, rural development at densities no greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. o Existing Land Use (see attached) — largest uses — 36% Rural Residential; 34% Lake and Open Water; 16% Urban Low Density Residential; and 10% Park, Recreational and Open Space. o Future Land Use (see attached) • Residential densities proposed are described below • Rural Preserve —1 unit per 5 acres (0.2 u/a) • Rural Residential —1 unit per 2 acres (0.5 u/a) • Urban Low Residential—0.5-2.0 u/a • Urban Medium Residential —3.0-10.Ou/a • Urban Medium-High/Mixed Use Residential —10.0-20.Ou/a • Urban High Density —20.0-25.Ou/a • Island Residential —1 unit per 5 acres (0.2 u/a) Page 2 -1541 - 2040 City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Review— August 22, 2018 • The Emerging Suburban Edge portion of the community is guided to achieve an overall minimum density of 3.16 units per acre (which is within the 3 to 5 target). • Possible residential development outside of the MUSA is generally referred to, but specific growth parameters and locations are not given • Included as an Appendix to the Land Use Plan is the Navarre Area Plan, which resulted in planned land use changes in the area (see attached) Industrial — not being expanded. a Housing o In 2016, 89.8% of housing units were single-family detached, however, since 2005, the city has added 153 multi -family units. o Over half of the owner -occupied homes in the city are valued over $500,000. o Orono is required to plan for 154 affordable units. To address this requirement Orono has specified that 247 housing units will be started by 2030. a Transportation o Orono will continue to work with Hennepin County and surrounding communities to figure out a solution to the growing congestion along County Road 15/Shoreline Drive. a Parks, Trails and Open Space o The City intends continued implementation of its Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces plan. The city has a system of neighborhood mini -parks, neighborhood parks, special use parks, and lake accesses. There are also regional parks and regional trails in the community. Page 3 -1542- Table 3B 5 Net Density Net Res. LnndUse Acres Net Guided #ofunks Density (Units (Planned Der. Category Gross Residential Density (Target, based on per aces) Areas) Resid. Acres Range(Low) lowdensity) within MUSA Area A Med High 81.6 27.22 3,10 199.26 7.32 Area B High 9.74 9.74 10 97.4 10 Area C Medium 8.94 8.94 3 26.82 3 Area D 2.51 2.51 10 25.1 10 Area E I Law 1 144.47 1 135.65 0.5 1 68 1 0.50 High, Mreed Area 25.05 24.11 10 241.1 10.00 tine 272.31 208.17 657.68 3.16 • Possible residential development outside of the MUSA is generally referred to, but specific growth parameters and locations are not given • Included as an Appendix to the Land Use Plan is the Navarre Area Plan, which resulted in planned land use changes in the area (see attached) Industrial — not being expanded. a Housing o In 2016, 89.8% of housing units were single-family detached, however, since 2005, the city has added 153 multi -family units. o Over half of the owner -occupied homes in the city are valued over $500,000. o Orono is required to plan for 154 affordable units. To address this requirement Orono has specified that 247 housing units will be started by 2030. a Transportation o Orono will continue to work with Hennepin County and surrounding communities to figure out a solution to the growing congestion along County Road 15/Shoreline Drive. a Parks, Trails and Open Space o The City intends continued implementation of its Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces plan. The city has a system of neighborhood mini -parks, neighborhood parks, special use parks, and lake accesses. There are also regional parks and regional trails in the community. Page 3 -1542- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 18 - RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THE CITY OF MOUND HAS NO COMMENTS REGARDING THE 2040 ORONO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, Minnesota statute requires municipalities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area to update their comprehensive plans every 10 years; and WHEREAS, prior to submittal of a comprehensive plan update to the Metropolitan Council, the proposed plan must be distributed to adjacent communities and affected governmental agencies for a 6 month review and comment period; and WHEREAS, the City of Orono distributed its 2040 comprehensive plan update to affected jurisdictions for formal review on April 27, 2018; and WHEREAS, formal comments from affected jurisdictions on the proposed comprehensive plan update are to be provided to the City of Orono in advance of October 29, 2018; and WHEREAS, City of Mound Staff and consultants reviewed the draft 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan and summarized in a Staff Memorandum the relevant components of the plan and that no issues were identified from the review; and WHEREAS, after discussion at their August 21, 2018 meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council issue a statement of no comment to the City of Orono; and WHEREAS, the Staff Memorandum and Planning Commission recommendation were considered by the City Council at their August 28, 2018 meeting. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby affirms that the City of Mound does not have any official comments on the 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan update and directs Staff to send this resolution to the City of Orono. Adopted by the City Council this 28`h day of August, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1543- Mayor Mark Wegscheid MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 21, 2018 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. R01 i rni i Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode, David Pelka, , Jameson Smieja and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jake Saystrom and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Secretary Jill Norlander, and Consultant Rita Trapp. Members of the public: Richard Strand, 1680 Dove Lane; Beth Gieseke, 1566 Eagle Lane; Roger Fink, Trident St. Cloud; Erik Trooien, 4321 Wilshire Boulevard Old/New Business A. Review/Recommendation —2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan Trapp reviewed the features of the 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan as follows: • Orono is designated as emerging suburban edge and rural residential. • Densities are less than Mound. • The plan identifies growth within the MUSA but is not clear about the amount of future growth outside the MUSA. Given where rural residential is located, it is not an issue that significantly impacts Mound. • Transportation and utility elements were review by Bolton & Menk and they have no concerns. • Parks and trails planned for the area with no significant impact on Mound. Overall staff has no concerns. MOTION by Smieja, second by Pelka, to send a "no comment" from the Planning Commission to the City Council for the 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan. MOTION carried unanimously. -1544- CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation In 2010, Orono's median household income was $111,000 compared to that of the seven county metro area ($65,200). Table 2-7: Median Household Income Orono 7 County Region 1990 Census $ 62,900.000 $ 36,600.00 2000 Census $ 88,300.000 $ 54,300.00 ACS 2006-2010 $ 111,000.000 $ 65,200.00 ACS 2012-2016 $ 119,400.000 $ 70,900.00 source: US Census and American Community Survey COMMUNITYPHILOSOPHY Orono's Community Management Plan is a statement by the citizens as to what we are, where we have been, and where we are going. Orono will retain its own special identity through careful growth management in the best interest of the environment, the natural resources, the watershed of Lake Minnetonka and the community of citizens, both present and future. Orono's past growth and development patterns have been greatly influenced by the extensive and varied natural features found within our borders. Map 313-5 indicates the pattern of land use as it exists today. It is apparent that development has been drawn by the lakes and clustered by the many bays and marshes. The most significant resource is Lake Minnetonka. The largest lake in the metropolitan Twin Cities area, Minnetonka has 22.4 square miles of surface area and approximately 130 miles of shoreline running along numerous bays, channels and inlets. Lake Minnetonka's watershed, including the Lake itself, encompasses 123 square miles, and approximately 115 of the contributing watershed lies in Orono. Orono has two distinct personalities: The historically developed lakeshore and the rural woods, fields and open spaces. Both areas are primarily residential in nature, relying upon the existing town center of Navarre and other nearby cities such as Long Lake, Spring Park, Wayzata, Mound and Maple Plain for shopping, employment, and entertainment activities. The concern of the residents is to provide for continuing maintenance and preservation of those natural resources and social amenities which attracted people to Orono in the first place. Near the lake, density of development has to be regulated in order to minimize the resultant stormwater runoff pollution which, if unrestricted, could permanently alter and destroy the ecology of this very unique resource. Away from the lake, the natural marshes and wetlands are to be protected as the primary and most practical method of storm water filtration and enhancement. Steep slopes will be protected from over -development and erosion. Woodlands will be preserved as wildlife habitat, erosion protection, noise barriers and places for personal solitude and contentment. Orono's primary goal of preserving the water quality and level of Lake Minnetonka can only be accomplished by maintaining the basic integrity of the natural watershed. City of Orono Community Management Plan 20.81-2040 -1545- Part 2, Page 11 CMP Part 2. Community Manaeement Plan Foundation Open space is to be cherished and protected. In urbanized areas, recreational needs go hand-in-hand with the necessities of light, air, and solar access. Views of the lakeshore are invaluable property rights and personal experiences. In rural areas, the open fields and pastures are witness to the rural lifestyles active in Orono, and each property owner has the ability to provide for his own varied recreational needs. Institutional and commercial needs have been met by the existing centers with no need for future expansion. The geographic relationships between the many lake area communities expand the services available to Orono residents beyond the City's borders. The many industrial, retail -commercial and health care facilities readily accessible locally and regionally are adequate to serve the needs of Orono residents. School populations are increasing slowly, and new technologies and program demands require some expansion of existing facilities but no new centers. Orono's population growth has been historically slow, allowing for gradual service increases and fiscal security. Public facilities have been provided and will continue to be improved at a level sufficient for protection of health and safety, but unobtrusively enough to allow continued self- independence and maintenance of rural lifestyles. The basic philosophies of the CMP are to the extent possible consistent with the policies and guidelines contained in the Metropolitan Council's "2040 Regional Development Framework". Future urban density in the urban area along the lake is to be in -fill development where existing urban services are available. Rural land use in the low-density residential lakeshore areas and in the area away from the lake, is to be free from expanded urban services except when necessary to protect the public health or to eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. In all neighborhoods, provisions are made for protection of environmental assets and for provision of open space and recreational amenities. Housing opportunities in and near Orono are available in a wide range of alternatives consistent with the availability of public services. Existing and planned sewer and transportation facilities are capable of servicing the planned density of development, and land use patterns are consistent with and complementary to those of neighboring cities. Orono's managed growth policy means that the need to use and enjoy Lake Minnetonka will be balanced with protection of its water quality and accessibility for future generations. This policy means that the acceptance of growth and development changes will be balanced with conservation of our resources and natural amenities, and maintenance of our small town social character. Orono intends to remain two communities in one. The historically developed area around and near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline has been called "Urban" because of historic developed density with lots typically one acre in area or smaller and the availability of a limited level of urban services. The area away from the Lake has been termed "Rural" because of the lack of density, the abundance of open space and the citizens' commitment to maintain this type of development. The majority of Orono's 'Rural Area' has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. When wetlands and roads are factored in, nearly 80% of the City's land will be developed at densities averaging from approximately 1 unit per 3 gross acres up to 1 unit per 7 gross acres, sufficient to meet the City's environmental protection goals. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area ("MUSA") was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. As part of its Metro 2040 Regional Growth Strategy developed in 1996, Metropolitan Council for discussion purposes suggested that all but the northwestern tip of Orono will be in the MUSA by 2020. However, the City Council in the City's 2000-2020 CMP included a much smaller area within the MUSA (Map 4C-2) to be consistent with the extent of City -planned municipal sewer extensions, and to be consistent with the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2082-2040 Part 2, Page 12 -1546- CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation development plans of our neighboring municipalities. Map 3B-2 depicts Orono's defined "Urban" areas (where zoning density will range from 1 unit per acre to as many as 20 units per acre) and its "Rural" areas (where ultimate developed density will range from 1 unit per 5 acres to 1 unit per 2 acres). Orono's 2010-2030 MUSA as approved by Met Council in 2008 reflect a clear intent to bring municipal sewer to lakeshore and shoreland areas where needed, as well as to existing concentrations of population where septic systems may not be suitable for the long-term. But most of all, Orono citizens have located the MUSA line and have defined the urban and rural areas to be consistent with their plans for permanent use and development of the City. COMMUNITY GOALS AND POLICIES The goals and policies of this plan have met the test of time in Orono. The basic premise of maintaining distinct urban and rural neighborhoods continues a hundred -year tradition. The commitment to environmental preservation remains uppermost in the list of priorities of Orono's residents. The inter - reliance of lake area communities for shopping and commercial needs, for housing variety and for provision of basic public services is both historic and economically practical. The following goals and policies reflect the basic philosophies of Orono. Goals and policies affecting the entire City are grouped in an "overall" category. In addition, more detailed goals and policies are separated under their appropriate "urban" or "rural" classification. Finally, each separate CMP chapter has detailed goals and policies relating to that particular subject. GENERAL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Planning Goals 1. The foremost guiding principle and goal of Orono's planning is to protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka, and all Lakes and natural resources, its water quality, and its recreational assets. This goal continues a commitment established half a century ago. It includes preservation of the associated marshes, wetlands and natural drainageways as the primary, most practical and cost efficient method of preventing flooding and of filtering out the nutrient pollution from stormwater runoff. Maintaining a low-density rural area away from the lake, and managing the quality of runoff that flows directly to the lake, are important elements of this goal. 2 To retain the existing urban -rural land use pattern on a permanent basis. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2($$-2040 Part 2, Page 13 -1547- N 0 A 3 2 �J Raw 30 Z8 7CZ m 7 ROM O m-ri ZO �Z L d C'I w N I C�1 Am tom y 1 C SWbbs bay RoatlN F. n PI A pO mq 9= 03 0 G y wry ym 0y0y50 O.O z 3+ 3 a o3'o'a 36 3 3 0 0 O O O d N 20 IC m � — m n � y _ 71 b. U A m ■/1J O y DN]I NtAt am DyD~ c m pN�N�o .lyl��i -1 O b I�1 ym N p ^ ^ m 2 o ti m 1 z z 3 m 3. of z Z Z ?� _ z x d N tom y 1 C SWbbs bay RoatlN F. n PI A pO mq HK 3i MIAMI - LTA IA LTA [a]1L•\1pill LTA TO: City Council FROM: Rita Trapp, Consulting Planner Sarah Smith, Community Development Director DATE: August 22, 2018 SUBJECT: Hennepin County 2040 Comprehensive Plan Review MEETING DATE: August 28, 2018 City of Mound Staff and consultants reviewed Hennepin County's draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan (httos-.//www.henneoin.us/your-government/om ects-initiatives/comprehensive-plan.) and found that there are no areas of concern for the City of Mound. Highlights, as summarized below, were presented to the Planning Commission at their August 21, 2018 meeting. As recommended by Staff, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to the City Council that no official comments were required from the City of Mound on the proposed 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan. A draft resolution affirming that the City of Mound has no comment has been prepared for Council consideration and action. 2000 Plan Highlights Of projected regional growth, Hennepin county's share is expected to be 32% of population growth, 33% of household growth, and 48% of job growth. By 2040, Hennepin County is expected to have 374,000 households with 253,000 residents, as well as 489,000 jobs. Mission—The mission of Hennepin County is to enhancethe health, safety, and quality of life of our residents and communities in a respectful, efficient, and fiscally responsible way Vision — We envision a future where residents are health and successful and where our communities are safe and vibrant. We will strive to meet and exceed expectations by engaging people and communities in developing innovative solution to challenges. We will be a diverse, learning organization. We will partner with others to enhances the quality of life in Hennepin County and the region. Overarching Goals o People are Healthy o People are Protected and Safe 1552- 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan Review — August 22, 2018 o People are Self-reliant o People are Assured Due Process o People are Mobile • County's Role — in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan the County recognizes that its role in addressing big issues is going to vary. At times the County will play a supporting or contributing role, such as providing information or conducting research. In other cases, Hennepin County will be directly involved in operating facilities or programs, or at times, Hennepin County may be a leader by funding initiatives or enforcing laws. • As Hennepin County is comprised of municipalities that are required to create their own Comprehensive Plans, the focus of the County's plan is different than the adjacent communities that we are also reviewing. The chapters of Hennepin County's plan include Mobility 2040 Transportation System Plan, Regional Parks and Trails, Water Resources, Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area, and Implementation. Information on all but the Mississippi River Criterial Corridor Area are provided below. • Mobility 2040 Transportation System Plan o Hennepin County has 2,200 lane miles of roadways, 651 miles of bikeways, 379 miles of sidewalks, and 147 bridges. There are also 55 miles of rail corridors, two light rail transit lines, one bus rapid transit line, and one commuter rail line. o Mobility 2040 provides overarching guidance while a family of plans provides specific plans and programs for each part of the system. This includes 11 plans covering modes (such as pedestrian, bicycle, freight, etc.), as well as system elements (such as ADA, complete streets, asset management, etc.) o Specific transportation components of note relative to Mound include: Figure 4-01 Pedestrian Plan Implementation Priorities notes that some of the county roads do not have sidewalk or trail on them. As with other developed communities in the County, Mound is shown as having a higher priority than rural areas. Figure 4-03 Bikeway System Gaps shows an on -street gap on County Road 110 between County Road 15 and County Road 125. Also an on -road gap on County Road 44. Figure 4-15 Envisioned Roadway System and Right -of -Way Needs shows most county roadways as 3/2 lane divided roads. Exceptions are County Road 15 to the east of County Road 110 where it is already a 4 lane divided road segment, as well as County Road 44, which is shown as a 2 lane undivided rural segment Figure 4-16 Functional Classification shows County Roads 15 and 100 as A minor arterials and County Roads 125 and 44 as major collectors. Page 2 -1553- 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan Review — August 22, 2018 Figure 4-17 Jurisdiction Transfer Candidates— County Road 125 is shown as a candidate to be transferred back to the City of Mound. • Regional Parks and Trails — Hennepin County does not plan for, own, or operate the parks and trails within its borders. They are the responsibility of Three Rivers Park District (Three Rivers), the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB), and cities. The plan acknowledges the regional park and trails within the County as required by the Metropolitan Council. • Water Resources o Wastewater— Hennepin County provides aseptic permitting, inspection, and enforcement program. As the County has no land use authority, the County partners with cities to incorporate the permitting process into their planning and zoning approval process. o Surface Water — Hennepin County works cooperatively with municipalities, watershed management entities, and the two park districts to address water resources. The County is a soil and water conservation district so it takes the lead in delivering assistance to land managers. It provides technical assistance to watershed organizations. It also collaborates with multiple agencies on Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies and Watershed Restoration and Repair Strategies (WRAPs). Currently, there are 21 approved TMDLs in Hennepin County. A TMDL is the maximum amount of pollutant that a water body can received without violating water quality standards. Using a TMDL study a pollution reduction plan is put into place. • Implementation o Official controls — Ordinance 19 regarding individual sewage treatment systems and Ordinance 22 which allows the County to manage the use of the right-of-way and other uses for public purposes. o County funding— wheelage tax, property taxes, regional railroad authority property tax, and sales and use transportation tax.] o Capital Improvement Program —five year plan for needed transportation improvements. No improvements in Mound are shown. Page 3 -1554- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 18 - RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THAT THE CITY OF MOUND HAS NO COMMENTS REGARDING THE 2040 HENNEPIN COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, Minnesota statute requires counties in the Twin Cities metropolitan area to update their comprehensive plans every 10 years; and WHEREAS, prior to submittal of a comprehensive plan update to the Metropolitan Council, the proposed plan must be distributed to adjacent communities and affected governmental agencies for a 6 month review and comment period; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County distributed its 2040 comprehensive plan update to affected jurisdictions for formal review on June 12, 2018; and WHEREAS, formal comments from affected jurisdictions on the proposed comprehensive plan update were asked to be provided to Hennepin County in advance of September 10, 2018; and WHEREAS, City of Mound Staff and consultants reviewed the draft 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan and summarized in a Staff Memorandum the relevant components of the plan and that no issues were identified from the review; and WHEREAS, after discussion at their August 21, 2018 meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council issue a statement of no comment to Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the Staff Memorandum and Planning Commission recommendation were considered by the City Council at their August 28, 2018 meeting. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby affirms that the City of Mound does not have any official comments on the 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan and directs Staff to send this resolution to the Hennepin County. Adopted by the City Council this 28`h day of August, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1555- Mayor Mark Wegscheid MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 21, 2018 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. R01 i rni i Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode, David Pelka, , Jameson Smieja and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jake Saystrom and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Secretary Jill Norlander, and Consultant Rita Trapp. Members of the public: Richard Strand, 1680 Dove Lane; Beth Gieseke, 1566 Eagle Lane; Roger Fink, Trident St. Cloud; Erik Trooien, 4321 Wilshire Boulevard OLD/NEW BUSINESS Review/Recommendation — 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan Trapp reviewed the features of the 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan as follows: • HC is not responsible for many of the areas that other plans are responsible for, such as land use and parks • The bulk of their plan is focused on transportation • 11 other transportation related plans are referenced in their comp plan • There are transportation components that relate to Mound, such as pedestrian and bikeway gaps • There is interest to transfer jurisdiction of some roadways in Mound of which the city is aware • Hennepin County does septic permitting in cooperation with the cities as needed for individual sewage treatment systems • Surface water is also a focus for Hennepin County. It involves a lot of partnerships and collaborations • The 2040 plan has no significant impacts to Mound —transportation would be the primary element, but there are no surprises. City Staff and consultants will be incorporating related transportation elements into Mound's Comprehensive Plan now that the information is available. Smieja asked if there were any plans for light rail. Smith indicated that the right-of-way through Mound is actually owned by Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority and is reserved for future rail use but there is no date identified. It's currently not in the 2040 plan. MOTION by Smieja, second by Pelka, to send a "no comment" from the Planning Commission to the City Council for the 2040 Hennepin County Comprehensive Plan. MOTION carried unanimously. -1556- nRIB Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp, Consulting City Planner DATE: August 22, 2018 MEETING: August 28, 2018 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 18-08 Variance for 1680 Dove Lane (PID 13-117-24-12-0270) Request Summary The applicant, Richard Strand, submitted an application for a variance for the replacement of the front section of his house. The existing lot of record, totaling 9,535 square feet, is a residential lot location on Dove Lane. According to Hennepin County data, the current home was built in 1924. This residential lot is comprised of three historically platted lots that combined are 120 feet wide and 80 feet deep. The house was placed within the southernmost of the three lots only 6.9 feet from the side lot line and approximately 12 feet from the front lot line. The front porch, which was enclosed over the years, is not on properfootings and is settling unevenly. The applicant would like to remove the existing 9.2 by 22 foot enclosed front porch and replace it with a 14 by 24 foot addition with a basement. Avariance is needed as the front yard setback will be decreased to from approximately 12 feet to 7.3 feet and the side yard setback would be reduced to from 6.9 feet to 5.9 feet. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commi ssi on revi ewed this case at thei r August 21, 2018 no noting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. No concerns were raised by those in attendance at the meeting. The Planning Commission discussed potential visibility concerns but noted that the home adjacent is located closer to the street then the proposed addition. The Planning Commission was in agreement with Staff that the deteriorating footings and the location of the kitchen and bathroom on the north side of the house resulted in practical difficulties for this property. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the variance with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff. Recommendation Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. 1557- RESOLUTION NO. 18 - RESOLUTION APPROVING A FRONT YARD AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 1680 DOVE LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 18-08 PID NO. 13-117-24-12-0270 WHEREAS, the applicant and property owner Richard Strand submitted a request for a variance to replace the existing, enclosed porch with a slightly larger permanent room with basement at 1680 Dove Lane; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R-2 two family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 9,535 square foot property includes a home that was constructed in 1924; and WHEREAS, the existing enclosed porch is on footings that are settling unevenly and pose a structural hazard; and WHEREAS, the applicant is proposing to remove the existing enclosed porch and replace it with a slightly larger room and basement that follows the foundation of the current home: and WHEREAS, the proposed addition will result in a front yard setback of 7.3 feet and a side yard setback of 5.9 feet, which do not meet minimum setback requirements for the R-2 zoning district; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) outlines the criteria for granting variances which is provided below: (a) Criteria. A variance to the provisions of this chapter may be granted, but is not mandated, to provide relief to the landowner in those zones where this chapter imposes practical difficulties to the property owner in the use of the owner's land. No use variances may be granted. A variance may be granted only in the event that the following circumstances exist: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. -1558- (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. ; and WHEREAS, according to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. ; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the August 21, 2018 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the variance subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the variance request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 21, 2018 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the variance as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the variance request at its August 28, 2018, meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner; and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the variance application was made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the variance, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met -1559- Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. The non -conforming location of the home on the property, established when was built in 1924, limits the ability for the front porch to be replaced without a variance. The need to replace the footings of the front porch for safety and structural reasons necessitates improvements on the front of the home. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve a variance for the property at 1680 Dove Lane to allow construction of a first floor expansion and basement that has a setback of 7.3 feet from the front property line and 5.9 feet from the side property line with the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 6. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 7. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. -1560- Adopted by the City Council this 28`h of August, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche. Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -1561 - MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 21, 2018 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode, David Pelka, , Jameson Smieja and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jake Saystrom and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Secretary Jill Norlander, and Consultant Rita Trapp. Members of the public: Richard Strand, 1680 Dove Lane; Beth Gieseke, 1566 Eagle Lane; Roger Fink, Trident St. Cloud; Erik Trooien, 4321 Wilshire Boulevard REVIEW OF JUNE 19, 2018 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Bussey, second by Pelka, to approve the June 19, 2018 meeting minutes as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS A. PC Case No. 18-08 —Variance —House Addition 1680 Dove Lane Applicant: Richard Strand Rita Trapp introduced the item. The applicant is requesting a variance for the replacement of the front section of his house, which is a previously enclosed front porch. The existing porch has failed footings and the applicant wants to remove it. A variance is needed as the plan calls for the front yard setback to be reduced from 12 feet to 7.3 feet and the side yard setback be reduced from 6.9 feet to 5.9 feet. Staff is recommending approval of the variance due to the existing non -conforming location of the home on the property when built in 1924 and the need to structural upgrade necessities. Velsor asked if there will still be a porch on the home. Trapp stated that the porch would be removed and converted into "house". Smieja was concerned with visibility because the street would be so close. Smith stated that the application was routed to Public Works and Engineering and there were no concerns in that regard. Richard Strand, 1680 Dove Lane, confirmed that the porch will be converted into house. Smieja thought that the loss of visibility backing onto the street could be a problem. He does understand the constraints of the kitchen and plumbing in the middle of the house. -1562- Planning Commission Minutes - Draft August 21, 2018 MOTION by Goode, second by Bussey, to approve the variance with staff recommendations and findings of fact as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. -1563- 112 TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Planning Consultant Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 15, 2018 18-08 (Variance) Variance Application Richard Strand 1680 Dove Lane (PID 13-117-24-12-0270) August 21, 2018 Low Density Residential R-2 Two Family Residential BACKGROUND The applicant, Richard Strand, has submitted an application for a variance for the replacement of the front section of his house, which is a previously enclosed front porch. The existing lot of record, totaling 9,535 square feet, is a residential lot location on Dove Lane. According to Hennepin County data, the current home was built in 1924. REVIEW PROCEDURE Variance City Code Section 129-39 (a) states that a variance may be granted to provide relief to a landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulty for the property owner. In evaluating the variance the City Council must consider whether: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. -1564- (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. According to City Code Sec. 129-2, "Practical Difficulties" is defined as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule. The "Day 1" was determined to be June 26, 2018. The applicant is advised that the City of Mound will be executing a 60 -day extension in advance of the current deadline. NOTIFICATION Property owners abutting the subject site, per Hennepin County tax records, were mailed a letter on August 15, 2018 to inform them of the Planning Commission's review of the application at its August 21, 208 meeting. SITE INFORMATION This residential lot is comprised of three historically platted lots that combined are 120 feet wide and 80 feet deep. The house was placed within the southern most of the three lots only 6.9 feet from the side lot line and approximately 12 feet from the front lot line. The front porch, which was enclosed over the years, is not on proper footings and is settling unevenly. The applicant would like to remove the existing 9.2 by 22 foot enclosed front porch and replace it with a 14 by 24 foot addition with a basement. A variance is needed as the front yard setback will be decreased from approximately 12 feet to 7.3 feet and the side yard setback would be reduced from 6.9 feet to 5.9 feet. -1565- STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to involved City Departments and affected public agencies for review and comment. Megan Schirmers, MCWD. The addition project proposed at 1680 Dove Lane in Mound does trigger our Erosion Control rule as there will probably be over 50 cubic yards of fill/excavation for the basement. Please let the homeowner know that they must apply for an Erosion Control Permit from MCWD. Brian Simmons, Bolton & Menk. No issues. DISCUSSION ® The applicant has provided an existing floor plan of the house. As the floor plan shows, the north side of the house is comprised of a living room, kitchen, and bathroom. This arrangement limits the value of a similar addition towards the north of the home. In addition, given that the front porch has to be removed, renovations to the front of the home will be needed. e Existing hardcover on the site is 1,691 square feet (17.7%). The addition will increase the hardcover on the site to 1,825 (19.1%), which is well under the maximum allowed by City Code. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the variance for this site subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 2. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 3. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 4. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. -1566- 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 6. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 7. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval of the variance, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-39 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The non -conforming location of the home on the property, established when it was built in 1924, limits the ability for the front porch to be replaced without a variance. 4. The need to replace the footings of the front porch for safety and structural reasons necessitates improvements on the front of the home. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the possible meeting date is August 28, 2018; an alternate date is September 11, 2018. -1567- AOU � Cc '50 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 CITY OF MOUN Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application. Planning Commission Date City Council Date SUBJECT PROPERTY LEGAL DESC. 19 Please type or print legibly Address 1680 DOVE` L ANC Case No. I k Lot -L4 4 , 15', 16 Block ©® 3 Subdivision DAC -14 N WOOO PID # 13 -1 17-24-/2 '®2 70 Zoning: R1 RIA R2 R3 Bt 62 B3 (Circle one) Name RICHARD 8, 5TRAIV,0 Email SiCfrcfoh ®nccA rt, corn A d • - ter. r. DOVE- Phone Home 1-72 ` X35 5 -_Work `).SZ®21?- 89 /55 Fax APPLICANT I Name SAM&, (IF OTHER THAN Email OWNER) Phone Home Work Fax Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes ( ) No (X. If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): P&71c,VAL Val 2 2 X GI 1=A? 9 �T `e 7�u. s 61_ f . �It�Osoe>r�'r7H k14511c' Ivof�if<Tt:�rli✓ dv�r-Ss�t:� f>'Gt �V Variance Information (1/19/2018) Page 4 of 6 -1568- Case No. < b 3. Do the existing structures comply with all area, height, bulk, and setback regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ) No (A. If no, specify each non -conforming use (describe reason for variance request, i.e. setback, lot area, etc.): y/AR)7 5CC'7-13 A61- (v, sr) 51',) 6-:_ ✓�l /1�/� 1-`012 26TV0Sr" C /-114/✓6C GF FI.2W SETBACKS: Front Yard: Side Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: Lakeside: (NSE EO) ( N a W ) ((5)SEW) (NS&) (NSEW) (NSEW) Street Frontage: Lot Size: Hardcover: REQUIRED 2 C ft. LUC sgft 2966', 5 soft REQUESTED (or existing) 7, 3 ft in ft. / 2 ft. Ccl 5 3 sq ft 122/.,4- SQ. ft VARIANCE 12 , 7 ft. Q fe 0 ft. O ft. t S ft LUC sgft 2966', 5 soft REQUESTED (or existing) 7, 3 ft in ft. / 2 ft. Ccl 5 3 sq ft 122/.,4- SQ. ft VARIANCE 12 , 7 ft. Q fe 0 ft. O ft. ft. ft. sq ft CpN6O/271j Sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes { }, No (?�}. If no, specify each non -conforming use: 5. Which unique physical characteristics of the subject property prevent its reasonable use for any of the uses permitted in that zoning district? ( } too narrow O topography ( ) soil ( ) too small () drainage (>I existing situation ( ) too shallow (} shape ( ) other: specify Please describe: J�G14C C-1 i i>G 5 7PC./C7j /2 E Cl,' r Variance Information (1/19/2018) Page 5 of -1569- Case No. J 6. Was the practical difficulty described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes ( ), No QQ. If yes, explain: 7. Was the practical difficulty created by any other human -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (Y. If yes, explain: 8. Are the conditions of practical difficulty for which you request a variance peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes ( ), No (X). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? /r 41 1 G5 %t�%l��Gk` G/l7/TS Gc;l3ifrawm tFk75;7 F=ved'A/tea %AL=L!? 9. Comments: <= ROlf7" 14IPe Fr i �- 5 /moo 6%' /y a7- ti�e�✓G r� t� ro P170 10a, cz CONST37✓GY/0 WOE(/) yd>// 'G, /-Y?c o✓"i /l�lL Gi C?/ f9l /L % / G ?C� �3U/G�/�✓G LT 1113 ?t7e,, t,4177Y 0145C11C/L' T I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. Owner's Applicant's Signature f Variance Information 1570 - (1/19/2018) Page 6 of 6 Date Z 2 3v<v 19 22-)U1,' /,3 P An HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS ---- (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: 1,68C OWNER'S NAME: RI C/ila`P'/) 57-,1?14 IV Z) LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 30% = (for all lots) .............. _ ........................ S LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. ` Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized, as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official. LENGTH WIDTH SQ FT HOUSE 36. / X 2+ ft- 4 /o. / X /0� 7 --/08 TOTAL HOUSE ...... ........... ................................... 16122,1+ DETACHED BUILDINGS 3 X 12— (GARAGE/SHED) 2— (GARAGE/SHED) TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... UNDER OVER (indicate difference).................................................................... PREPARED BY 12161 -IA 'O DATE 2 2 i<//11 ,9 Revised 1/10 - 1571 - X - TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS ............................... rr f DRIVEWAY, PARKING 37,3 X 12- _ 4- 8 AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC.x 1 G�./ d2 S X / c _ 5' a 624 TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ........ .......... -- ................. DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. X Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X — counted as hardcover. X - TOTALDECK ....................................................... X - X = TOTAL OTHER .................................................... TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ................................................... UNDER OVER (indicate difference).................................................................... PREPARED BY 12161 -IA 'O DATE 2 2 i<//11 ,9 Revised 1/10 - 1571 - From: Strand, Richard B Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 3:43 PM To: Rick Cc: Rick Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Variance Application for Property at 1680 Dove Lane - Request for Additional Information Sarah, I will do my best to address the criteria in your letter as follows (1) i : The property and the area that requires the variance are my residence and will be used for that purpose as per the zoning ordinance. (1) ii : The house was built in 1924. It's placement on the lot is from that time. The front section of the house that requires the variance was a porch that was enclosed some time in the past. It is not on proper footings and is settling uneven. Underpinning is not a option as the cost is more than the proposed plan. The proposed plan will: 1) Address the necessary structural defects. 2) Increase the useable space both above ground and below. 3) Bring that area up to current code standards. 4) Increase the value of the property. (1) iii : The basic character of the house will not be altered. Although it will be closer to the street, it will not be as close to the street as the next door neighbors house. The new roof line will be different from current roof but will closer match the roof lines on the main house. The front door and sidewalk will be moved from the street side to the driveway side (north). The proposed front will be approximately 1 foot closer to the street than the current sidewalk. (2) No special privileges are anticipated or requested (3) As the house is currently constructed (see current floor plan) the area in the south west corner is somewhat useless due to its small size. I currently use it for storage. The proposed plan increases this area to a useful size. (4) The primary purpose for the variance is to address the current structural problems at the front of the house. Secondary is that it increases the useable living space. Thirdly, it increases the value of the property. I hope this provides the additional information that you need. Current floor plan will follow. This is sent from work email. Please reply to stardonCalmchsi.com Thank You, Rick Strand -1572- for - Rick Strand 1680 Dove Lane Mound, MN 55364 H� E 0 Noy E% ! 0 20 so.. o 9/mea F ! p/7ar� , fie 76 4 / v n lq \ oa4 ,. y IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: EXISTING HOUSE: 689 S.F. x'44 / PATIO PAVERS: 187 S.F. / 96 S.F. DRIVEWAY: 448 S.F. PROPOSED ADDITION: 336 S.F. V AA8 / --— — — a. / 1S / fi Xyafi ha y IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: EXISTING HOUSE: 689 S.F. PORCH: 69 S.F. PATIO PAVERS: 187 S.F. SHED: 96 S.F. DRIVEWAY: 448 S.F. PROPOSED ADDITION: 336 S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS: 1,825 S.F. LOTAREA: 9,535 S.F. IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE: 19.1% DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lots 14, 15, and 16, Block 3, DREAMWOOD, Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. T 22703 06/02/18 Steven V. ledhe License No. Date /.verse to Pd'ED 1ADD! ,/ L� NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM REVISED: 06/22/18 - Law Floor Elev. PROJ. NO.: 1581-00 JUN 2 5 2018 PREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 1600 Arboretum Blvd., Suite 203 Victoria, MN 55386 952-443.3010 LEGEND 0 Set t2'x l4 gahar ® FOUND IRON MONUMENT Survey contml Point X Spot Elevation oacm.o.s Tree V Fine Tree --— — — — — cont.., Line —�. Do-emmnms.aa.. n.m.n. NAVD88 VERTICAL DATUM REVISED: 06/22/18 - Law Floor Elev. PROJ. NO.: 1581-00 JUN 2 5 2018 PREMIER LAND SURVEYING, LLC 1600 Arboretum Blvd., Suite 203 Victoria, MN 55386 952-443.3010 W Ci 5 rRS D o C.r lv 4 � S EJL M1}. V yq�! l l �'P�aIy �'+Ap i 5 l V v r+, m w 00 y n t� v v r+, m w 00 y ice_. -1575- 4 1 W - I r ' y T i I 11i4 r n a r :. -1576 IN 2 -1578- IPo -1578- A'_• - `C X STlLET- row k y -1579- 4 4� [ t � ok d it � � �� .✓ f� 4 �r U JUN 2 5 - 71580 -1581 - 1 i,. -1581 - HK 5i Executive Summary TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Consulting City Planners DATE: August 22, 2018 MEETING: August 28, 2018 SUBJECT: Planning Case No. 18-10 Expansion Permitter 1566 Eagle Lane (PID 12-11]-2443-0002) Request Summary The applicant/property owners, Steve and Beth Gieseke, have submitted an application for an expansion permit for second floor addition onto their existing home at 1566 Eagle Lane. The 1],]42 square foot Lakeshore lot of record contains a single-family home and a detached garage. It is located at end of Eagle Lane, on Three Points. The applicants are proposing adding a second floor addition to the non -lake facing rear of the house, along with an internal remodel. The existing home has non conforming setback for the front yard of 16.7 feet from the lot line; the applicant is requesting an expansion permit to vertically expand the structure within that same 16.7 foot setback. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their August 21, 2018 meeting. Draft minutes from the meeting have been prepared for your review. No concerns were raised bythose in attendance at the meeting. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the expansion permit with the conditions and findings as proposed by Staff. Recommendation Given Staff and the Planning Commission recommendation for approval, the attached resolution has been prepared for your consideration. 1582- RESOLUTION NO. 18- IN*IQ 11,1j1M01Ie1»:1611lIMM 011*3Jet01MM011»NLVA IIII I FOR 1566 EAGLE LANE PLANNING CASE NO. 18-10 PID NO. 12-117-24-43-0002 WHEREAS, the applicants and property owners (Owners), Steve and Beth Gieseke, have submitted an application for an expansion permit; and WHEREAS, the property is located in the R -1A single-family residential zoning district; and WHEREAS, the 17,742 square foot property includes an existing home and detached garage; and WHEREAS, the applicant is seeking to add a second -story addition to the non-lakeshore side of the home; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an expansion permit to allow the existing front yard setback of 16.7 feet be extended vertically for the second floor addition; and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-40 (a) outlines the criteria for granting an expansion permit which is provided below: and (1) The proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. Function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. Absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. Adequacy of off-street parking. (2) Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have had no control. (3) The exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) The expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) The expansion requested is the minimum needed. -1583- WHEREAS, details regarding the requested expansion permit for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the August 21, 2018 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the expansion permit subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the expansion permit was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 21, 2018 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended Council approval of the expansion permit as recommended by Staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the expansion permit request at its August 28, 2018 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner: and WHEREAS, the City Council's decision on the applications were made within the timelines included in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval of the expansion permit, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The desire for a two-story home is reasonable for a residential property. 4. The front yard setback of 16.7 feet is an existing condition that will be maintained as the building is vertically expanded with a second floor addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the expansion permit for the property at 1566 Eagle Lane, as described in Exhibit A, with the following conditions: 1. The applicant must maintain hardcover under the 40% maximum allowed. This will be verified at the time of building permit. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. -1584- 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. 8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mound, the City Council's approval of the request is based on information contained in the record including but not limited to, the applicant's request and submitted information, the Staff Report, and the Planning Commission's review and recommendation. Adopted by the City Council this 28`h of August, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche. Clerk Mark Wegscheid, Mayor -1585- MINUTE EXCERPTS MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 21, 2018 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. R01 i rni i Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode, David Pelka, , Jameson Smieja and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jake Saystrom Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Secretary Jill Norlander, and Consultant Rita Trapp. Members of the public: Richard Strand, 1680 Dove Lane; Beth Gieseke, 1566 Eagle Lane; Roger Fink, Trident St. Cloud; Erik Trooien, 4321 Wilshire Boulevard BOARD OF APPEALS A. PC Case No. 18-10 —Expansion Permit— Upper Floor House Addition 1566 Eagle Lane Applicant: Steve and Beth Gieseke Trapp introduced the request. The applicants are requesting an expansion permit to add a second floor addition. The front is non -conforming at 16.7 feet. The portion on the lake side is already 2 stories. This request affects only the street side of the house. Staff evaluation is that the proposed upper floor is within the allowed maximum building height. There is no additional hardcover Both building height and hardcover will be verified at the time of the building permit. MOTION by Smieja, second by Velsor, to approve the expansion permit with staff recommendations and findings of fact as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. -1586- TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING CASE NO. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: MEETING DATE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING: Planning Commission Rita Trapp and Laura Chamberlain, Planning Consultants Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 13, 2018 18-10 (Expansion Permit) Expansion Permit Steve and Beth Gieseke (Owner) 1566 Eagle Lane (PID 12-117-24-43-0002) August 21, 2018 Low Density Residential R -1A Single Family Residential The applicant/property owners, Steve and Beth Gieseke, have submitted an application for an expansion permit for second -floor addition onto their existing home at 1566 Eagle Lane. The 17,742 square foot lakeshore lot of record contains a single-family home and a detached garage. It is located at the end of Eagle Lane, on Three Points. The applicants are proposing to add a second floor addition to the non -lake facing rear of the house, along with an internal remodel. The existing home has non -conforming setback for the front yard of 16.7 feet from the lot line; the applicant is requesting an expansion permit to vertically expand the structure within that same 16.7 foot setback. REVIEW PROCEDURE City Code Section 129-40 (a) states that an expansion permit for a nonconforming structure may be granted to provide relief to the landowner where the application of the City Code imposes practical difficulties. In determining whether practical difficulties exist, the City Council shall evaluate the following criteria: (1) the proposed expansion is a reasonable use of the property considering: a. function and aesthetics of the expansion. b. absence of adverse off-site impacts such as from traffic, noise, odors and dust. c. adequacy of off-street parking. -1587- (2) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion are unique to the property and result from lot size or shape, topography, or other circumstances over which the owners of the property, since enactment of this chapter, have had no control. (3) the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. (4) the expansion would not adversely affect or alter the essential character of the neighborhood. (5) the expansion requested is the minimum needed. NOTIFICATION Abutting property owners per Hennepin County tax records, were sent written notice on August 15, 2018 to inform them of the expansion permit request and that the application was included on the August 21, 2018 Planning Commission meeting agenda for review. 60 -DAY PROCESS Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Mound has sixty (60) days to approve or deny the land use request unless an extension is executed by the City in accordance with state rules. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule and was determined to be July 7, 2018. A _ ai The 17,742 square foot property has an existing home, with the lakeside half of the house at two -stories, and the non -lakeside half at one-story; the home was constructed in 1930. The applicant is proposing to add a second story to the non -lakeside half of the house. As shown on the attached survey, the existing home's front yard has a setback of 16.0 feet, which is less than the required 20.0 feet for the R -1A Zoning District. An expansion permit is needed to allow for the vertical expansion of this front yard setback for the proposed second floor addition. STAFF/CONSULTANT/AGENCY REVIEW Copies of the request and supporting materials were forwarded to all City departments for review and comment. Members are advised that some comments received during review have been addressed and, are therefore, not included in this report. See additional comments which are summarized below: Megan Schirmers, MCWD. The only rule that may be triggered depending, on the scope of the addition, is MCWD's erosion control rule. It is triggered for any project that disturbs 5,000 sf or has 50 cy of excavation/fill of soil. Using the Hennepin County map, the area of any proposed addition on the home is out of the floodplain and there are no wetlands on site. DISCUSSION Staff's evaluation is that the proposed upper floor addition is within the allowed maximum building height of 35 feet. This will be verified at the time of the building permit. There is no additional hardcover proposed as part of this application. However, the applicant is advised that as a lot of record, the parcel allows for a maximum of 40% hardcover, which is 7,097 square feet. Any changes to hardcover will be verified at time of the building permit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the expansion permit for this site subject to the following conditions: The applicant must maintain hardcover under the 40% maximum allowed. This will be verified at the time of building permit. 2. Applicant shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with the land use request. 3. No future approval of any development plans and/or building permits is included as part of this action. 4. Applicant shall provide all required information upon submittal of the building permit application. 5. Applicant shall be responsible for procurement of any and/or all local or public agency permits including, but not limited to, the submittal of all required information prior to building permit issuance. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 7. No building permit will be issued until evidence of recording of the resolution at Hennepin County is provided unless an escrow of sufficient amount is on file with the City. The applicant may also direct the City to record the resolution with the fees to be taken out of the escrow. -1589- 8. Effective September 1, 2011, new Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules related to wetlands, floodplain, erosion control and others are in effect. These rules are now under the jurisdiction of the MCWD as regulatory authority and permitting was officially turned back to the District by the Mound City Council on August 23, 2011. Applicant is directed to contact the MCWD related to the new regulations and applicable permits that may be needed to undertake the proposed project. Evidence from the MCWD in the form of a permit or waiver must be provided before release of any future building permit. In recommending Staff approval of the expansion permit, the following findings of fact are offered: 1. The criteria of City Code Section 129-40 (a) are being met. 2. Improvements to the residential use of this property are in keeping with how it is zoned and guided in the comprehensive plan and will not change the existing neighborhood character. 3. The desire for a two-story home is reasonable for a residential property. 4. The front yard setback of 16.7 feet is an existing condition that will be maintained as the building is vertically expanded with a second floor addition. CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, the possible meeting date is August 28, 2018; an alternate date is September 11, 2018. -1590- 1w4iji IL 2415 Wilshire Boulevard, Mound, MN 553 Phone 952-472-0600 FAX 952-472-0620 C/ Application Fee and Escrow Deposit required at time of application'. Case No. f �-10 Please SUBJECT I Address I - f6 PROPERTY LEGAL Lot 3 e_ � DESC. Subdivision DO Block 1�2- PID # I d^" 1 k f —.2q "`q 3—CDCZ,-,Zoning: R1 R1A R2 R3 B1 B2 83 (Circle one) Name S-t-c/r, 4-9-14 Email SSG 1 &S t,1- eC°',N Phone Home 66Z 70NYe,.17Work s . � 3 c9 S" Fax APPLICANT I Name (IF OTHER THAN Email OWNER) I Phone Home Work Fax 1. Has an application ever been made for zoning, variance, conditional use permit, or other zoning procedure for this property? Yes (X No ( ). If yes, list date(s) of application, action taken, resolution number(s) and provide copies of resolutions. 2. Detailed description of proposed construction or alteration (size, number of stories, type of use, etc.): �c A -exz)66 1n,s a` k ra" pie, r k rtit F �' c.,.)� Expansion Permit Information. (3/20/2018) Page 4 of 6 -1591 - 3. Please complete the following information related to the property and building's conformity with the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located including the expansion permit request. SETBACKS: REQUIRED REQUESTED EXPANSION (or existing) Front Yard: (N S E W) 2.0 ft. 140.7 Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Side Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Rear Yard: (N S E W) ft. ft. ft. Lakeside: (N S E W) ft. ft, ft. (N S E W) ft, ft. ft. Street Frontage: ft. ft. ft. Lot Size: sq ft sq ft sq ft Hardcover: sq ft sq ft sq ft 4. Does the present use of the property conform to all regulations for the zoning district in which it is located? Yes ( ), No W). If no, specify each non -conformity: 5. Are there exceptional or extraordinary circumstances justifying the expansion unique to the property such as lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances over which the owners of the property since enactment of this chapter have no control? Please check all that apply: ( ) too narrow ( ) too small ( ) too shallow Please describe: - t Expansion Permit Information (3/20/2018) Page 5 of 6 ( ) topography ( ) drainage ( )shape »,P/ . 4-: rn, -1592- ( ) soil existing situation blj other: specify 0 rase No. D p (d Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances described above created by the action of anyone having property interests in the land after the zoning ordinance was adopted (1982)? Yes j�,'), No { ). If yes, explain: 7 aa�i� "ate 7. Were the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances created by any other person -made change, such as the relocation of a road? Yes ( ), No (�<). If yes, explain: 8. Are the exceptional or extraordinary circumstances for which you request an expansion permit peculiar only to the property described in this petition? Yes N, No { ). If no, list some other properties which are similarly affected? 9. Comments: I certify that all of the above statements and the statements contained in any required papers or plans to be submitted herewith are true and accurate. I acknowledge that I have read all of the variance information provided. I consent to the entry in or upon the premises described in this application by any authorized official of the City of Mound for the purpose of inspecting, or of posting, maintaining and removing such notices as may be required by law. •,. Expansion Permit Information (3/20/2018) Page 6 of 6 -1593- Date Date G Y HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS (IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE) PROPERTY ADDESS: OWNER'S NAME: 5- �Cjetq <* �i PSS LOT AREA �!v , �%� C) SQ. FT. X 30% = (for ail lots) ....'�. r.�... �................. �— LOT AREA SQ. FT. X 40% = (for Lots of Record) ............................. - C _ Existing Lots of Record may have 40 percent coverage provided that techniques are utilized. as outlined in Zoning Ordinance Section 129-385 (see back). A plan must be submitted and approved by the Building Official, LENGTH WIDTH SO FT HOUSE -5—_ X a2 5— XC� TOTAL HOUSE DETACHED BUILDINGS % X;;zl _ c (GARAGE/SHED) X - TOTAL DETACHED BUILDINGS........... .%... DRIVEWAY, PARKING X AREAS, SIDEWALKS, ETC. C X - -70 X - TOTAL DRIVEWAY, ETC ................... lM....... DECKS Open decks (1/4" min. X —_ Opening between boards) with a pervious surface under are not X — counted as hardcover. X - TOTAL DECK . ........................................ .-...... ...... X - X = TOTALOTHER ......- ............................................ TOTAL HARDCOVER / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE..................................��..�.. �/. 3 UNDER / OVER (indicate difference) ... ..................... ..... _........ .......... ............. .... .. PREPARED BY Revised 01/12/10 -1594- l6 73 DATE /11v 78 i -1595- bDy y$C ` VNIN171� I enol ?a 4=`s {{Sy;� ;483 < s -1595- -1596- 03 �fv aSp�pp R W29C ei� �QYv VV �QU t 19ip�1 £ (A II LL� low IQd yy ay s u �a� R -1596- IN -1597- }g�pyoylppI Asil I�dNIWll3�de $E; 4_g H. f IN -1597- /#4TJ.2 !\ � gW2m )E-- § ; � \ / � � � ^� `! m}\� 2_\ t'• .� m.. \ . . ------------ - ----- -- ww��\2 \ § • :E ! ) 2| )� 2 } = ! 1--46 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR DAN STROT OF LOTS 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 2, WOODLAND POINT -IENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA �o oa" hs F / a t .0j Ian,— i eJ P t¢iZ} ry LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: v0 Lots 3, 4, and 5. Block 2, Woodland Point 46" o; denotes iron marker set m: denotes iron marker found N> Bearings shown are based upon an ? S>'!v assumed datum. Boo This survey intends to show the bound- aries of the above described property, and the location of an existing house thereon. It does not purport to show any other improvements or encroachments. .Vafe : Bi/j. /oc.f:�n i {ron 1-13-77, 1 hereby certify that this survey was Prepared by me orunder my direct super, un rs i'i3"p Aed.,,4 vision, and that lam adult' registered Civil Engin land Surveyor un, PI694,^��/•^� the laws of the State of Mmncsnta. scnuu 1i�:20^ -N� ��ronberg Minnesota License Numb,, 12755 JOB No, 94'462 I� Executive Summary To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Sarah Smith, Community Development Director Date: August 22, 2018 Request: Sign variation for Area Identification Sign/Monument at 1861 Commerce Boulevard for Harrison Bay Senior Living Zoning: R-3 Residential Comprehensive Plan: Medium Density Residential Summary. The City Council will consider a request from Roger Fink, on behalf of Trident Development, LLC for sign variation/modification approval as provided by City Code 119-2 (e). Trident proposesto install a new monument sign located at 1861 Commerce Boulevard for the 72unitsenior, assisted living and memory care residential facile ythat received land use and subdivision approvals in 2016/2017 and is currently under construction. Completion is expected in September/October. Review Procedure. City Code Sec. 119-2 (2) allows a variation/modification to the City's sign regulations where it can be shown that by reason of topography or other conditions, that strict compliance of the regulations would cause a hardship. Avariation/modification may be granted only if the variation/modification does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of Chapter 119 (Signs). Requests for a sign variation/modification requires review bythe Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council. Sign Type. The type of sign to be installed is an Area Identification Sign which is defined as follows: "Area Identification Sign means a singlefreestanding sign located on identified premises, said premises shall measure no less than two acres in area, which identifies a residential subdivision, condominium, multiple residential complex, and industrial area, an office complex, two or more commercial businesses within one structure, or any combination of the above." 1600- Sign Requirements. The sign requirements for the R-3 District that apply to the proposed monument sign are defined in City Code Sec. 119-5 (4) (c) and provided below: C. Area identification sign. One sign not to exceed 24 square feet in area for each development district entrance provided said sign is not placed within ten feet of any street right-of-way and not in excess of ten feet in height. Sign Variation/Modification Request. The proposed sign meets the 24 square foot area size and 10 foot height requirements but requires sign variation/modification approval for sign placement that does not meet the required 10 foot setback from the street right of way. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation. The Planning Commission reviewed this case at their August 21st special meeting. Roger Fink on behalf of Trident Development, LLC was present at the meeting. No other persons attended the meeting about the sign request. The Planning Commission discussed the background of the City's lift station that is in the vicinity of the proposed sign and the sign's proposed location and size. The Planning Commission also confirmed with the applicant that the sign will be externally lit Based on its review, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the sign variation / modification. A draft of the meeting minutes is included for your reference. As both the Planning Commission and Staff recommended approval of the request, Staff prepared the attached resolution for City Council consideration. -1601 - RESOLUTION NO. 18 - RESOLUTION APPROVING SIGN VARIATION/MODIFICATION FOR 1861 COMMERCE BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the applicant, Roger Fink, on behalf of Trident Development, LLC, submitted a request requesting sign variation/modification approval as provided by City Code 119-2 (e); and WHEREAS, the applicant proposes to install a new monument sign located at 1861 Commerce Boulevard for the 72 -unit senior, assisted living and memory care residential facility that received land use and subdivision approvals in 2016/2017 and is currently under construction; and WHEREAS, project completion is anticipated in September/October, 2018; and WHEREAS, City Code Sec. 119-2 (2) allows a variation/modification to the City's sign regulations where it can be shown that, by reason of topography or other conditions, strict compliance of the regulations would cause a hardship. A variation/modification may be granted only if the variation/modification does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of Chapter 119 (Signs). A request for a sign variation/modification requires review by the Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the sign requirements for the R-3 District that apply to the Area Identification Sign, which are defined in City Code Sec. 119-5 (4) (c), allows for one sign not to exceed 24 square feet and 10 feet in height. The sign must be located 10 feet of any street right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the proposed sign meets the square footage and height requirements but is proposed to be installed on the property line with a 5 foot setback from the right of way; and WHEREAS, details regarding the requested variance for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Report dated August 14, 2018 and the submitted request and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the sign variation subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the sign modification/variation request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 21, 2018 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend Council approval of the sign variation/modification, subject to conditions, as recommended by Staff. and -1602- WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the sign variation/modification request at its August 28, 2018 meeting and determined that approval would allow the property to be used in a reasonable manner: and WHEREAS, the City Council's action on the sign variation/modification meets the City's decision requirements contained in Minnesota Statutes 15.99; and WHEREAS, in granting approval, the City Council makes the following findings of fact: The height and square footage of the sign meet the R-3 regulations. 2. The lift station and related improvements in the subject area affect the placement of the proposed sign. 3. It is a reasonable to have signage to identify the senior, assisted living and memory care residential facility. 4. The design of the sign is compatible with the site/building development activities. 5. A monument sign was shown on the original project plans that were approved by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound does hereby incorporate and restate the recitals set forth above and approve the sign variation/modification for the property at 1861 Commerce Boulevard with the following conditions: As provided by City Code Sec. 119-4 (d), the City reserves the right to specify the hours during which the sign may be lit to prevent the creation of a nuisance. 2. Lighting/glare shall meet the provisions in the City Code. 3. Applicant shall be required to contact MnSpect, the City's building official, to determine what permits are required for the proposed monument sign, including any lighting that may be involved. 4. No signage shall be installed until all permits have been issued. 5. Applicant is required to contact the Hennepin County Transportation Department prior to sign installation activities to determine whether separate permitting is required for sign installation including, but not limited to, work in the County Road ROW. 6. Applicant is required to contact the Mound Public Works Department prior to sign installation activities. -1603- The sign variation/modification is hereby approved for the following legally described property: -to be inserted - Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of August, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk Mark Wegscheid -1604- LTA 11►Lill 1:1X3olA11:AM MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 21, 2018 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode, David Pelka, Jameson Smieja and Philip Velsor. Absent: Jake Saystrom and Jennifer Peterson. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Secretary Jill Norlander, and Consultant Rita Trapp. Members of the public: Richard Strand, 1680 Dove Lane; Beth Gieseke, 1566 Eagle Lane; Roger Fink, Trident St. Cloud; Erik Trooien, 4321 Wilshire Boulevard BOARD OF APPEALS A. PC Case No. 18-11 —Sign Variation —Monument Sign 1861 Commerce Boulevard Applicant: Harrison Bay Senior Living (Trident) Smith introduced the request. The city's approvals of the project plans included a monument sign in the vicinity of its proposed location; however, due to the location of the new lift station, Trident now proposes to install the sign located closer than the 10 -foot setback from the road right-of-way. Smieja asked about the location of the right-of-way in relation to the sidewalk. He also asked why the lift station was located at that spot. Smith said that it was located there to provide the most optimal service for the neighborhood, not just Harrison Bay. The old lift station was on the other side of Commerce Boulevard. Roger Fink, Trident Development, stated that the lift station location was negotiated early on. The sidewalk is 4-5 feet from the project property line. Sign will not be internally lit but lit by external directional lights. Mr. Fink questioned the Building Official's involvement. Smith indicated that, because of the need for footings the Building Official needs to review and inspect. Smieja asked if there was any consideration of moving the sign to the north side of the driveway. Mr. Fink said that it was considered but that the wetland on that side of the driveway was even closer and more restrictive. Smieja asked how the sign height was determined as the diagram appeared to be taller than 6 feet. Mr. Fink indicated that the "legs" of the diagram are below -ground footings. He went on to describe the construction features in detail. -1605- Planning Commission Minutes - Draft 2 August 21, 2018 Baker asked how the sign size is measured and about dimensions shown. Smith indicated that the sign size is measured by the sign face excluding the monument area and architectural feature. It was noted the sign plan indicates 24 square feet but measures 23 plus feet. Smith indicated an updated graphic for sign was included in the packet however the size may not have been revised on the plan. The new sign area will meet the 24 square foot allowance. Smieja stated that he has no logical concerns. MOTION by Goode, second by Baker, to approve the sign variation with staff recommendations and findings of fact as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. -1606- PLANNING REPORT To: From: Date: Request: Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: Planning Commission Sarah Smith, Community Development Director August 14, 2018 Sign variation/modification for new monument sign at 1861 Commerce Boulevard for Harrison Bay Senior Living R-3 Residential Medium Density Residential Summary. At part of its August 21, 2018 special meeting, the Planning Commission will consider a request from Roger Fink, on behalf of Trident Development, LLC, for sign variation/modification approval as provided by City Code 119-2 (e). Trident proposes to install a new monument sign located at 1861 Commerce Boulevard for the 72 -unit senior, assisted living and memory care residential facility that received land use and subdivision approvals in 2016/2017 and is currently under construction. ComDletion is expected in September/October. Review Procedure. City Code Sec. 119-2 (2) allows a variation/modification to the City's sign regulations where it can be shown that, by reason of topography or other conditions, strict compliance of the regulations would cause a hardship. A variation/modification may be granted only if the variation/modification does not adversely affect the spirit or intent of Chapter 119 (Signs). Requests for a sign variation/modification requires review by the Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council. Information The City's approvals of the Harrison Bay Senior Living project plans included a monument sign in the vicinity of its proposed location. However, its current location has been shifted to the north due to the location of the new City sewer lift station. The proposed monument is located within the drainage/utility easement that was created for the lift station and related improvements. -1607- The proposed project requires sign variation approval, as provided by City Code Sec. 119, to allow for sign placement that does not meet the required 10 foot setback from the road right-of-way • Per City Code Sec. 119.3 (b), an Area Identification Sign is defined as follows: "Area Identification Sign means a single freestanding sign located on identified premises, said premises shall measure no less than two acres in area, which identifies a residential subdivision, condominium, multiple -residential complex, and industrial area, an office complex, two or more commercial businesses within one structure, or any combination of the above." The sign requirements for the R-3 District that apply to the proposed monument sign are defined in City Code Sec. 119-5 (4) (c) for an Area Identification Sign are provided below: Area identification sign. One sign not to exceed 24 square feet in area for each development district entrance provided said sign is not placed within ten feet of any street right -of --way and not in excess of ten feet in height. • The sign area on the Area Identification Sign includes the name of the facility, the address, the telephone number and a logo. • The proposed monument sign will have a stone finish on the bottom and has been designed to be architecturally compatible with the new building. The monument sign has text on 2 sides (south/north facing elevations.) • For a double -sided sign, only 1 side of the sign is counted for the purpose of evaluating maximum allowed sign size. • The proposed location has been reviewed by the Hennepin County Transportation Department who advised they do not have issues with the proposed sign. • Neighboring property owners of the subject site in the vicinity of the proposed sign location, per Hennepin County tax records, were notified by letter on August 15, 2018 of the sign variation request and that it was being included on the Tuesday, August 21st Planning Commission meeting agenda for review and discussion. � The sign permit and sign variation/modification request was received on July 19, 2018. Minnesota Statutes 645.15 sets forth the procedures for determining "Day 1" for the purpose of application of the 60 -day rule for land use applications and was determined to be July 20, 2018. Per statute, the City of Mound has 60 days to approve or deny the application unless an extension is executed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the sign variation request to allow a 5 foot setback from the road right-of-way, subject to the following conditions: As provided by City Code Sec. 119-4 (d), the City reserves the right to specify the hours during which the sign may be lit to prevent the creation of a nuisance. 2. Lighting/glare shall meet the provisions in the City Code. Applicant shall be required to contact MnSpect, the City's building official, to determine what permits are required for the proposed monument sign, including any lighting that may be involved. 4. No signage shall be installed until all permits have been issued. Applicant is required to contact the Hennepin County Transportation Department prior to sign installation activities to determine whether separate permitting is required for sign installation including, but not limited to, work in the County Road ROW. 6. Applicant is required to contact the Mound Public Works Department prior to sign installation activities. In recommending approval, Staff offers the following findings of fact: 1. The height and square footage of the sign meet the R-3 regulations. 2. The lift station and related improvements in the subject area affect the placement of the proposed sign. 3. It is a reasonable to have signage to identify the senior, assisted living and memory care residential facility. 4. The design of the sign is compatible with the site/building development activities. 5. A monument sign was shown on the original project plans that were approved by the City. -1609- CITY COUNCIL REVIEW In the event a recommendation is received from the Planning Commission, it will be forwarded to the City Council for action at an upcoming meeting. At this time, a possible meeting date is Tuesday, August 28, 2018; an alternate meeting date is Tuesday, September 11, 2018. 37 -1610- RIEi�EN DcvOopment, LLC • Sc Cloud, MN 320.252.3603 July 19, 2018 Ms. Sarah J. Smith, Community Development Director City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55362 VIA E-MAIL and Hand -delivered Re: APPLICATION FOR SIGN VARIATION Dear Ms. Smith: Harrison Bay Senior Living, LLC is please to submit this application for sign variation. This narrative is intended to describe the requested sign variation and provide rationale for approval. LOCATION — The development site is located at 1861 Commerce Boulevard, currently zoned R-3 High Density Residential. REQUESTED VARIANCES - The applicant requests approval of the following deviation (sign variation) from the provisions of Chapter 119, Section 119-5 of the City Code: 1. Allow for an Area Identification sign ("Monument Sign") be constructed and placed using a 5 -foot street right of way setback vs. the required 10 -foot street right of way setback. EXPLANATIONS - 1. On September 7, 2017 Harrison Bay Senior Living, LLC (the "Grantor") and the City of Mound ("City") entered into an Easement Agreement. The Grantor conveyed a permanent non-exclusive easement for drainage and utility purposes to the City over, under, across and through parts of their Property to locate, install, construct, repair, replace, maintain, use and operate the sewer interceptor/lift station/meter and other related improvements. 2. With the installation of the lift station and its drive lane, the area in which to construct and place the proposed Monument Sign is encroached by the City's lift station and does not meet the required l0 -foot ROW setbacks established by the sign ordinance, FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS — The proposed Monument Sign meets all other design and sign ordinance standards approved in an R3 zoning district for an Area Identification Sign as follows: The sign face measures 24 square feet. Maximum is 24 square feet. The height of the sign is 6 feet. Maximum is 10 feet in height. We thank you in advance for considering our application for sign variation and look forward to your comments and recommendations. Please feel free to contact me at (320) 258-4438 or (612) 242-6097 if there are any questions. Regards, Trident Developmen - —Z ��L-- r Q Roger D. Fink Sr. Vice President Enclosures C: Scott O'Brien, Trident Development, LLC -1612- Id N _X A 3 • 1 �i O; O O N 55.67 in 9 Q -1613- 71.5" 's -m- -tj - t co�P n'C/) 33 rn z ;z CD n ;0 o Q C 0 W 38.810 in i= €�hes61111,£g v1�11 A1,1'10�!18t97�8ie3E�°g 21 wwa�t" v1Op1 iI'ii,l �� Illi 4lJiiill Y 1� 1111 —-------- SITE — — — ---- e g S e f ;�1 F §= n a T RIDENT DEVELOPMENT, -" SITE&SIGN PLAN OCarinn - , w .n i —-------- SITE — — — ---- e g S e f ;�1 F §= n a T RIDENT DEVELOPMENT, -" SITE&SIGN PLAN OCarinn - , w .n 3so11em street soum, sultsl _ €t'e{ E St. Ooua�MN 56301 D SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY M Mound, i"nee.W e>m .w....xwxm�«<.euxvnixo 3890 eneasanc glopo.. ne alao, amine, MN 9511 iii 9pone: ]63-.M.0 H.:]63.489-]959 nAJk 2415 Wilshire Blvd, Mound, MN 55364 Phone 952-472-0600 Fax 952-472-0620 PERMANENT SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION Note: Any information supplied on this form will be considered public according to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. NOTE: This is a zoning permit only. Contact MNSPECT (952-442-7520) for bldg/elect requirements. SITE Property Address 1 clmr ey—oc, 'Ve Zonae BY & ii__04� Business Name rCxl ,4L-'(0(� I 1 QI' hone APPLICANT Name i (i IS�l �y-l'vCG1 f L) Pvif mail ) ✓ Vl6 U ZONING Phone �� t% J Fax�(C)-45�-�03 Other / AI7�—tCCCt OWNER Name tRlam o -v— Phone Fax SIGN Company Name/oy '- , Address 8 re kr , , )� �5 CONTRACTOR Contact Person _ bsk (� VI//6�U�� Email jt 1'7t?G�V15J[ PIS . 0-6 7L Phone( � �"'/� / FaxL� —'?�6/Other NUMBER OF SIGNS APPLYING FOR: _ (if more than one wall sign is beijng /re/isted, see Side 2) SIZE OF SIGN REQUESTED: i 011 feet high x � �/ feet wide = I T I square feet FREE STANDING SIGN height from ground level to top of sign WALL SIGN: Wall area = feet high x feet wide xi = Number of esting wall signs: List square footage of each existing sign: Total square feet of all existing wall signs: Percentage of wall area covered by signs: DESCRIBE SIGN (message, materials, illumination, etc.) : ;iQh 't VI e:,\Jo,-- cAervl feet square feet square feet sauare feet 7 ,1 iRI —�� DATE (OFFICE USE ONLY) SPECIAL CONDITIONS & COMMENTS: RECEIVED BY & DATE PLANS CHECKED BY APPROVED BY & DATE COPIED APPROVED ZONING Revised 2013 -1616- A CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 16-89 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES FOR DUTCH LAKE PRESERVE PLANNING CASE NO. 16-12 AND 16-17 PID NO. 14-117-24-14-0001 PID No. 14-117-24-14-0003 PID No, 14-117-24-14-0004 WHEREAS, the applicant, Trident Development, LLC, has submitted conditional use permit and variance applications for the development of Dutch Lake Preserve as described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the subject site (County Road 110) and Dutch Commerce Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the applicant has the purposes of developing a housing facility on the site; and generally located between Commerce Boulevard Lake in the City of Mound at the address of 1861 proposed a planned development area (PDA) for 72 -unit senior, assisted living/memory-care rental WHEREAS, multiple family residential uses with more than six units are conditionally permitted in the R-3 Multiple Family Residential district; and WHERAS, planned development areas (PDAs) are processed using a conditional use permit; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested multiple variances for the planned development area (PDA); and WHEREAS, City Code Section 129-39 (a) identifies the following criteria to be used when evaluating requests for variances: (1) The variance proposed meets the criteria for Practical Difficulties as defined in City Code Sub. 129-2. (2) Granting of the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to owners of other lands, structures or buildings in the same district nor be materially detrimental to property within the same zone. (3) The variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the practical difficulty. (4) A variance shall only be permitted when it is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance and when the and terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. WHEREAS, 'practical difficulties" is defined in City Code Section 129-2 as follows: Practical Difficulties, as used in conjunction with a variance, means that: (i) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; (ii) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstance unique to the property including unusual lot size or shape, topography or other circumstances not created by the landowner; and (iii) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. WHEREAS, details regarding the requested conditional use permit and variances for the proposed project are contained in the Planning Commission report for the June 7, 2016 meeting and the submitted application and supporting materials from the applicant; and WHEREAS, Staff recommended approval of the conditional use permit and variances subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the conditional use permit and variance applications at its June 7, 2016 meeting and recommended Council approval, subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing at its July 12, 2016 meeting to receive public testimony on the proposed conditional use permit application; and WHEREAS, the City has considered the proposed project as it might affect public health, safety, or welfare and will be imposing conditions upon the approval addressing these considerations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has studied the practicality of the request, taking into consideration the present and future development of the property and the requirements of the Zoning, Subdivision Ordinances, and other official controls; and -1618- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby approve the conditional use permit based on the following findings of fact: a. The proposed use of the site is consistent with applicable development plans and policies of the City of Mound. b. The physical characteristics of the site are suitable for type of development and use being proposed. c. Outlot A, which cannot be developed, will serve as a buffer between the development and Dutch Lake. d. The proposed development is providing adequate utilities and drainage. e. The proposed development has sufficiently considered traffic impacts and access. f. The proposed development will not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare of the community. 2. The City Council of the City of Mound does hereby the variances as requested by the applicant based on the following findings of fact: a. It is reasonable that the applicant seeks to use the site for a senior assisted living and memory care facility. b. The use of the site for an assisted living and memory care facility is in keeping with the land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. C. The variances will not alter the character of the neighborhood. d. The applicant has sought to protect the wetlands on the site and create a buffer for Dutch Lake through the establishment of Outlot A. These protections have reduced the development area on the site which results in the need for a slightly higher building and reduced side yard setbacks. The surrounding commercial, institutional, and multi -family uses will not be significantly impacted by these variances. The building has been set back over 200 feet from Commerce, reducing the view of the building from the road and lowering the impact the additional 4.5 feet of building height may have. -1619- The reduction in the size of the units is reasonable given that assisted living and memory care facilities seek to have larger common areas and smaller units to encourage socialization among residents. g. Allowing more than 20% efficiency units is reasonable given that the entire memory care unit is comprised of efficiencies and the assisted living unit has no efficiencies. h. The reduction in the amount of parking required is reasonable given that the facility is a memory care and assisted living facility and will have significantly fewer residents who drive and the facility will have a bus that helps to transport residents in the community. i. The waiver of a fence for the south parking area is reasonable given that the adjacent property is a school rather than residential homes and there is a grade difference between the properties such that the lights from cars will not be directed onto the school parking area. I The conditional use permit and variances are hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Concurrent approval of the major subdivision -preliminary plat application. 2. Applicant shall comply with any applicable state licensing requirements for the facility. 3. Payment of all fees associated with review of City's review of the conditional use permit and variance applications. 4. This conditional use permit and variances are approved for the following legally described property as stated in the Hennepin County Property Information System included on the attached Exhibit A. 5. The applicant shall be responsible for recording the resolution(s) with Hennepin County. The applicant is advised that the resolution(s) will not be released for recording until all conditions have been met. 6. This conditional use permit and variances shall be recorded with the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles in Hennepin County pursuant to M.S.S. 462.36, Subd. 1. This shall be considered a restriction on how this property may be used. 7. The applicant shall have the responsibility of filing this resolution with Hennepin County and paying for all costs for such recording or may direct Staff to file such resolution with the involved fees to be taken out of the submitted escrow. -1620- Adopted by the City Council this 12th of July, 2016. Mark Wegscheid, Mayor Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1621 - Exhibit A That part of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 117, Range 24, lying north of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Government Lot 1, 435.00 feet south of the northeast corner of said Government Lot 1 as measured along said east line; thence westerly parallel with the north line of said Government Lot 1 to the shore of Dutch Lake and there terminating. Except that part of said Government Lot 1 described as follows: That part of the north 165.00 feet of Government Lot 1, Section 14, Township 117, Range 24, lying east of a line parallel with the east line of said Government Lot 1 drawn southerly from a point on the north line of said Government Lot 1, 606.02 feet west of the northeast corner of said Government Lot 1, as measured along said north line. Hennepin County, Minnesota Torrens Property To be Replatted as "Lot 1, Block 1, Dutch Lake Preserve, Hennepin County, Minnesota" -1622- CITY OF MOUND — CITY MANAGER 2415 Wilshire Blvd Mound, MN 55364 TO: City Council FROM: Eric Hoversten, City Manager and Director of Public Works DATE: August 20, 2018 SUBJECT: CBD Parking Repairs, Unbudgeted Expenditure LOCATION: 2313 - 2365 Commerce Boulevard, West side business pads See included map REQUEST: Council approve a resolution granting the City Manager authority to award a contract to Minger Construction that includes City -owned or responsible surfaces in a collective repair project that restores and repaves parking behind the business pads at the subject locations following the met Council sewer project in that vicinity. The Resolution also considers a 30/70 cost share for the shared or common parking area work requested by the Owners. CITY STAFF REVIEW Property owners of the businesses on the west side of Commerce Boulevard operate under an agreement signed in June 2010 that preserves the CBD parking program established for these areas in 1970. The parcels included in the agreement "the Participants" include: 2313 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0042 2321 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0001 2339 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0002 2345 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0004 2365 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0003/85 Unaddressed Parcel south of 2365 14-117-24 44 0006 The original concept and its 2010 extension are intended to accommodate business activities in the area with no off-street parking present within the boundaries of their individual parcels. This agreement makes it possible for the businesses that are short parking based on City zoning requirement to continue to operate without unduly burdening other private properties. Parking requirements are assigned based on the zoning use and physical characteristics of the main floor of each pad site; and the agreement is recorded to run with the land. 1 -1623- The CBD parking agreement specifies that the City remain responsible for maintaining entry and exit corridors and there are several surfaces in this area that are actual platted Right of Way that remain fully City responsibility. A copy of the original agreement is included as Exhibit B to the proposed Shared Parking Agreement Amendment. The original Agreement assigns management of routine maintenance responsibilities for the common areas of the lots to the City and allows for minor maintenance "sweeping, signage, striping, pothole filling, and other minor surface repairs at the city's sole discretion to be reimbursed by the participants based on the agreed formula in the Agreement. However; the Agreement did not foresee or address completion of capital improvement in the form of renewal, major repairs, or reconstruction. Significant portions (approx 4,500 SY) of the privately -owned parking areas and city right-of-way areas were used as site access and project staging for the Met Council Dakota Trail Intercept Rehabilitation Project and will be repaired or renewed as part of the restoration of the work area. The Owners have sought to rehabilitate the remnant parking areas of the properties (1,270 SY) as shown and broken out in the included sketch. Council Resolution 18-50 granted Staff authority to negotiate an amendment to the original agreement to allow for one-time capital improvement and major repair to coincide with the Met Council restoration repairs to the lot. That Resolution allowed cost reimbursement be structured similar to our street assessment program, repayable over up to 15 years at a 5% interest rate. The property owners have agreed and signed the amendment (included herein) to the original agreement and the City is in receipt of a proposal on the cost for the work The full cost for this repair would initially be carried by the city as an unbudgeted obligation and covered in current reserves. The Street Seal Coat/Repair Fund funded via municipal liquor proceeds would be used to cover project cost. The City-owned/responsible entry and exits not included in the MCES restoration are in need of significant repairs. The total area of work proposed is approx 925 SY. Completing all of the work in this area under a single effort is desirable and would assure a consistent and high -performing final product. There is a small area embedded in the core of the common parking area that falls under City Responsibility that as priced would cost $3150.00. This area isn't severable geometrically and needs the same repair treatment as surrounding spaces in order to assure appropriate drainage and long-term pavement performance throughout the lot. The $30.00/SY quoted price here is in line with the scope and complexity of the work. The contractor has offered to complete the entry/exit work at south side of the lot at a competitive unit price of 24.00/SY, comparable to current bid -pricing on separately - procured City projects in 2017 and 2018. The total "lump sum" price for the City - responsible common area parking, entry and exit lane on the south side of the District, and a small portion of ROW outside of the Met Council restorations on the West edge of 2 -1624- the Lot under the collective project that results from the organization of the work under one contract is $22,750. The owners have put forth a request that the Council cover 30% of the common area costs based on the prevalent community use of the area that is not business -specific or related to the owners' business activities for events, activities, overflow, trail use, etc. As quoted, the common area work (1270 SY) price is $38,100 leaving the requested City cost -share contribution at $11,400. The total for the City work and requested cost share would be $34,150. Neither the City work nor any cost -share were budgeted in the 2018 Streets Operation and Maintenance budget or as a 2018 Capital Project. There are sufficient reserves in the Seal Coat/Street Repair fund to include this work. Ultimately, the Infrastructure Investment Reserve Fund was created to absorb these types of incidental repair opportunities. Approval of the proposed Resolution gives staff the authority to proceed with award of the contract with Minger Construction to complete the repair of the parking areas. The shared Parking Surfaces will be assessed to the owners and the small amount of City work and cost share will be paid in full by the City. The attached resolution addresses the City pavements and requested Cost Share discretely for separate and independent consideration by the Council. The Owner's Group will present further information regarding their request at the meeting, but base it on their allowance of general public use of the lot not directly related to their business activities. RECOMMENDATION The City Council for the City of Mound approve the Resolution granting the City Manager authority to approve a contract to complete the unbudgeted work to repair the City -owned and responsible area and participate in a 30/70 cost share for the CBD Shared Parking Area at the subject location along Commerce Blvd. 3 -1625- CITY OF MOUND RESOLUTION NO. 18 - RESOLUTION APPROVING UNBUDGETED EXPENDITURE TO REPAIR PARKING LOT PAVEMENTS IN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SHARED PARKING AREAS WHEREAS, The City of Mound Policy FIN -003 Procurement Policy was approved by the City Council on July 14, 2015 which requires advance Council approval for unbudgeted capital expenditures greater than $5,000; and WHEREAS, City Council Resolution 18-50 authorized Staff to negotiate an amendment to the 2010 Shared parking Agreement covering these lots to allow for one-time capitol repairs of the lot areas surrounding the 2313 - 2365 Commerce Blvd business pad sites with cost distributed among owners; and WHEREAS, the 2010 Parking Agreement assigns sole responsibility for maintaining entry and exit corridors and the various platted Rights of Way in the area to the City; and WHEREAS, City owned/responsible pavement areas are in need of significant repair; and WHEREAS, repair of the City-owned/responsible surfaces in conjunction with the other work within the lot funded by others will assure the most consistent and high -performing parking area in light of grading and drainage challenges in the area; and WHEREAS, the City is in receipt of a cost proposal for the City owned/responsible areas appropriate for inclusion with the rest of the parking lot repairs totaling $22,750 WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated this proposal and determined it to be fair and reasonable in all regards and consistent with the scope and complexity of work; and WHEREAS, the Business Owners have requested a 30/70 cost share of the remaining common areas of the lots based on frequent and beneficial public use of the parking for public events, gatherings, and activities in the surrounds; and WHEREAS, the quoted pricing for the common areas is $38,100 leaving the requested cost share amount at $11,400; and WHEREAS, the City work and proposed cost share total is $34,150; and WHEREAS, the costs for City work and any approved cost share are not included in the 2018 Operations and Maintenance or Capital Improvements budgets; and -1626- WHEREAS, the Street Seal Coat/Repair Fund funded by liquor operations and ultimately the Infrastructure Investment Reserve Fund have sufficient balances to carry this immediate expenditure; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound, Minnesota, hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into a contact to repair the City-owned/responsible portions of the Shared Parking Area at $22,750; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mound authorizes participation as requested in a 30/70 cost share for common lot area costs to repair the Shared Parking Area parking lots at 2301 through 2365 Commerce Blvd in the amount of $11,400; and That budget reserves in the Seal Coat/Street Repair and Infrastructure Investment Reserve Fund be used to cover these costs not to exceed $34,150. Adopted by the City Council this 28th day of August, 2018. Attest: Catherine Pausche, Clerk -1627- Mayor Mark Wegscheid 1141 � r• 4imlik CBD PARKING PROGRAM SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT FIRST AMENDMENT THIS F`IR'ST AMENDMENT ("Amendment') is made and entered into as of the � day of - t��, 2018 by and between, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and all of the owners listed and named in the attached Exhibit A and shown as signatories to this Amendment, (hereinafter collectively "Owners"). The City and the Owners (individually, an "Owner") may hereinafter be referred to individually as a "party" or collectively as the "parties." WHEREAS, the City and the Owners entered into a CBD Parking Program Shared Parking Agreement dated June 28, 2010, and which is attached hereto as Exhibit B ("Parking Agreement'); and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Parking Agreement to provide for the construction of a one-time project to improve a portion of the parking area that is the subject of the Agreement ("Project') as provided in this Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and their mutual promises the parties hereto hereby agree to amend the Agreement to provide for the construction of the Project in accordance with the following: 1. Scope of City Obligation. The City agrees to organize and execute the Project, which is a one-time major repair of the shared parking areas on behalf of the Owners to coincide with the repairs made to the lot areas by the Metropolitan Council as part of the site restoration work following completion of the Dakota Trail Intercept project. These repairs will address those areas remaining un -repaired as shown in the attached Exhibit C following the separately -agreed Metropolitan Council restoration work. Once constructed, the maintenance of the improved parking area will be conducted in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. 2. Determination of Fee. The costs the City incurs to construct the Project (collectively, "Project Costs") shall be the sole responsibility of the Owners, which shall be divided among each of the Owners in accordance with the fee allocation schedule attached hereto as Exhibit D. 3. Reimbursement by Special Assessment. Repair costs for each Owner may be paid in whole to the City at any time before November 1, 2018 with no interest charged thereupon. By choosing not to prepay such portion of the Project Costs allocated to a -1E29- particular property, the Owner thereof consent s to the City levying a special assessment for its allocation of the Project Costs against their respective property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061 ("Special Assessment"). The principal amount of the Special Assessment shall not exceed the actual cost of each Owner's allocation of the Project Costs, as defined herein. a. The Owners choosing to utilize the Special Assessment hereby waive notice of hearing and hearing pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031, on the Project and notice of hearing and hearing on the special assessment levied to finance the Project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061 and specifically requests that the Project be constructed and the Special Assessment be levied against their property without notice of hearing or hearing. b. The Owners choosing to utilize the Special Assessment further waive the right to appeal the levy of the Special Assessment in accordance with this Amendment pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 and further specifically agree with respect to such Special Assessment against their respective properties that: i. All requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 with which the City does not comply are hereby waived by the Owner; and ii. The increase in the fair market value of the Owner's respective property resulting from the construction of the Project will be at least equal to the amount of the Special Assessment levied against the Owner's respective property and that such increase in fair market value is a benefit to such property. c. The Special Assessment levied against the each property shall be payable over 15 years, and shall bear interest at a rate of five percent (5%) per annum. The first installment of principal and interest shall be included in the first tax rolls completed after adoption of the resolution levying the Special Assessment. d. The covenants, waivers and agreements contained in this Amendment shall bind the Owners and their successors and assigns and shall run with the each property. 3. Right of Entry. The City and its employees, agents, and contractors shall have the right to enter upon the Owners' properties after the date of this Amendment for the purpose of organizing, constructing, and completing the Project. 4. Compliance. The City Attorney and City Staff are authorized to take all necessary steps to secure compliance with this Amendment to the Agreement. 5. Counterparts. This Amendment to the Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. - 1630 - 6. Full Force and Effect. The Original Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect. This Amendment allows only for the one-time construction of the Project and, once complaint, shall remain in effect only as needed to support the imposition and collection of the Special Assessment on the Owners' properties to recover the costs of the Project. This Amendment does not otherwise have any ongoing modifying effect on the Agreement. 7. Entire Agreement, This Amendment, including the recitals and attached exhibits (which are incorporated in and made part hereof), sets out the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Project. No modifications of the language of this Amendment shall be valid unless reduced to writing and executed by all of the parties. 8. Notices. Any notice to be provided under this Amendment shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by United States Mail or delivered personally to the following addresses: or any other address that the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing: A. To Owners: See Exhibit A. B. To City: Eric Hoversten, City Manager City of Mound 2415 Wilshire Boulevard Mound, MN 55364 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed in their names and behalf and on or as of the date first above written. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands the day and year first written above. (Signature pages follow] CITY OF MOUND M Eric Hoversten City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS' COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by Eric Hoversten, the City Manager of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL Notary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ''_ ) SS. COUNTY OFnp_ ) A. e,se 557! �3zfle{i 131Je6�✓>2cu444'" e�gt"d' M'j The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (( qday of 6�z , 2018, by A. PaL_1 Mel ,s of ("'1CUAa , a Srb,rr, orja-, , Owner of the property located at < P� Aheu g— , Mound, MN 55364. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL JAMES D. ROBINETTE NOTARY At18LIC • M,INNESr, Tq NceY Public - A32 - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) _)34r5 Bivj, LLc- ) SS. 45 &vl a— v�/acl1 ✓ eacncd Meed S:ya COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Iday of 20)1 by fie.)r4 Rg , of ly7amld , a L Gam, Owner of the property located at--)34SC'eoLmgt,?. J31 , Mound, MN 55364, NO 4"S D. ROBINETTE NMary Public NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA l bM/14 I I1 Owner — SkA , a �t K" aentC tU!cl STATE OF MINNESOTA ) P3/,3 Co v oleee �,ef� ra2azt C(n�1 S53fc' ) SS. COUNTYOFJAe,n The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ( day of 2012, by Agu.J G,a U , of YVot4ncl , a Sn��Qrrrcv--4e-4 3 Owner of the property located at c23t 6gbb4we o 4th Mound, MN 55364. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL otary Public AIAES D. ROBINETTE NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA I Ca WD5:on Ewa Jan. 31, 2020 5 -1633- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF n caner hJz(S ' >2 LLC- )SS. _L_C,)SS. C1d awes Y✓ ey-5 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this %f� day of �(\C- 20)N, by , of cd+^P- a 4 Lr- Owner of the property located at ai l CwvwePF¢ L3) 1, Mound, MN 55364. 7A JAAIESD.ROBINETTE Wary Public 10 am* NOTARY PUBUC • MINNESOTA AyCan'risi EgftJan.31,2020 Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, by of a Owner of the property located at Mound, MN 55364. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL Notary Public - 15634 - 2313 Commerce Boulevard SHAUN & KAREN GAULD 2313 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 2321 Commerce Boulevard FRISCO 2 LLC C/O JIM MYERS 5212 W 56TH ST EDINA MN 55436 EXHIBIT A List of Owners 14-117-24 44 0042 14-117-24 44 0001 2339 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0002 ARTHUR P & PATRICIA A MEISEL 5501 BARTLETT BLVD MOUND MN 55364 2345 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0004 2345 COMMERCE BLVD LLC C/O JASON ZATTLER 2345 COMMERCE BLVD MOUND MN 55364 2365 Commerce Boulevard 14-117-24 44 0003/85 Unaddressed Parcel south of 2365 14-117-24 44 0006 A PAUL MEISEL PO BOX 258 MOUND MN 55364 A-1 1635 - EXHIBIT B, 2010 RENEWAL AGREEMENT Execution Copy 1 ' �,I "• i ll 19LIVAri 114 at 010 1 THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the de'ilay ofjU, e-- , 20_ by and between, the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and all of the individuals listed and named on the attached Exhibit A, and shown as signators of this Agreement, (hereinafter collectively "Owners") Background Owners own various tracts and parcels of land located within the area of the City shown on the attached Exhibit B, and referred to herein as the CBD. 2. The Central Business District Parking Program (hereinafter "CBD Parking Program") was established in 1970 and provides for a system of shared parking within the Central Business District, with certain maintenance activities provided by the City in the areas covered by the CBD Parking Program, and provides for payment of a CBD parking assessment by the Owners to offset costs incurred by the City in carrying out its obligations hereunder. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and their mutual promises the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: 1. Parking spaces allocated. The parking spaces shown on Exhibit C are to be made available for the use by all of the Owners, Owners' employees, customers and invitees in conjunction with Owners' business activities within the CBD, provided, that this Agreement confers no exclusive right to any Owner to any specific spaces or space within the area shown on the Exhibit C. 2. City Obligation. During the term of this Agreement the City will provide certain maintenance activities on the parking area described on Exhibit C. The maintenance activities are limited to the following all to be performed at intervals in the absolute discretion of the City: snow removal; sweeping; signage, striping, pothole filling and other minor surface repairs. With respect to the parking spaces shown in Exhibit C, the City will also be responsible for providing maintenance activities on areas owned by either the Owners or the City serving as access to parking. 3. I. Parking Use Fee. As consideration for overseeing the CBD Parking Program, maintaining parking and access areas, the Owners agree to pay the City an annual parking fee. 360353v6 7BD MU220-5 -1636- H. Determination of Fee. The fee for the year 2010 will be based on the cost to the city of operating the CBD Parking Program for the period from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011 (the 2010-2011 Contract year). The fee will be allocated on the basis of the allocation formula contained in Exhibit C. III. Payment of Fee. As soon as possible following July 1, 2011 the City will notify each Owner of the fee for the 2010-2011 contract year. The Owners may pay the fee at any time before November 1, 2011 at which time the City may, and is hereby authorized by the Owners to spread the fee against their property in the CBD to be collected in one installment along with other taxes. IV. Future Years. Unless an Owner elects to temunate this Agreement, the fee for future years will be determined in the same manner as for the 2010-2011 contract year fee. 4. Use of Parking Areas. Owners agree that they will use parking spaces shown on Exhibit C only for temporary parking of motor vehicles of the Owner, employees, customers, and invitees. Owners may also use the parking areas on their property for the temporary parking of delivery vehicles and vehicles used in connection with maintaining, servicing or repairing their property. The City may erect signs announcing these regulations and vehicles in violation of such regulations may be impounded and towed at the expense of the owner of the vehicle. The signage may also establish limits on the duration and the times of day that vehicles may park. Each Owner, as to parking spaces located on property owned by said Owner, hereby authorizes and consents to removal by the City, its officers, agents or employees, of any vehicles located on Owner's property not for the purposes described above. Each Owner, as to parking spaces located on property owned by said Owner, further authorizes and consents to allow the City to remove from such area any other vehicle, item or material located in such a manner as to interfere with the use of the spaces for parking, or the ability of the City to conduct its maintenance and repair activities; or otherwise constitutes a nuisance under the City Code. The City may from time to time with the consent of the Owners establish further rules and regulations applicable to parking areas covered by this Agreement. 5. Right of Entry. City and its agents shall have the right to enter upon the Property after the date of this Agreement for the purpose of maintenance and related activities including but not limited to, snow removal, striping, erecting signage, pothole filling and other minor surface repairs; and for any enforcement activities pursuant to paragraph 4. The Owner will be responsible for making the Property available for such activities. The City will not be obligated to do any work on areas on the Property which are made inaccessible by the parking of vehicles or storage of materials. 360353v6 JBD W220-5 -1637- 6. Indemnification and Insurance. Except for the negligent or willful misconduct of the City in carrying out its obligations hereunder, each Owner, as to claims originating on the property owned by such Owner agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City and all other Owners from any claims for property damage, personal injury or death arising out of use of such Owner's property as parking in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Each Owner will furnish the City with evidence that such Owner has liability insurance in an amount acceptable to the City insuring the claims for which the indemnity is given. The insurance will also name the City as an additional insured and will contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City. Such insurance will be kept in place at all times during the term of this Agreement or any extension. The City agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Owners from any claims or causes of action for property damage, personal injury or death occasioned by or arising out of its actions under this Agreement caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. The City will also provide the Owners with evidence that it has liability insurance in an amount acceptable to the Owners insuring against the claims or causes of action described above and which contains a waiver of subrogation as to the Owners. 7 Recording of Agreement. The City may, at its discretion, record this Agreement and Owner shall pay all costs associated with doing so. 8. Effect upon Subsequent Owners. The Agreement is intended to run with the land and is binding upon the parties herein and their respective successors and assigns 9. Miscellaneous. A. Either party may terminate this Agreement if the other party fails to comply with all of the requirements imposed upon them hereunder, or in the Resolution, and fails to cure such non compliance within (30) days following written notice of such failure. B. The City may also terminate this Agreement upon 60 -day written notice to the Owners if the termination by any Owners results in a reduction in available parking spaces below the amount needed to make the continuation of the program feasible. C. This Agreement will be automatically extended for successive additional one year terns unless any party notifies the others in writing at least 30 days before the expiration of the current term that it elects not to renew. In such case, the Agreement will continue as to the non -electing Owners unless the City determines the continuation of the program is not feasible. D. Owners whose participation in the program is discontinued for any reason: (i) shall have all responsibility for maintaining their parking area in conformity with all applicable regulations and requirements; and (ii) may not, after the effective date of such discontinuation use any of the parking areas in the CDB Parking Program for parking purposes for themselves, their employees, or their customers or invitees. E. Owners waive and release the City from any claim or cause of action, of any nature arising out of or occasioned by termination or non -renewal of this Agreement. 360353v6 rBD MU220-5 -1638- F. This Agreement constitutes only a license to Owners to use parking areas not located on such Owner's property for the purposes and subject to the limitations herein; and shall not be construed as creating any right, title or interest in such areas. 10. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with and be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11. Notices and Demands. All notices, demands or other communications under this Agreement shall be effective only if made in writing and shall be sufficiently given and deemed given when delivered personally or mailed by certified mail (return receipt requested) or registered mail, postage prepaid, properly addressed as follows: A. To Owners: See Exhibit A. B. To City: Kandis Hanson, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota, 55364 or to such other person at such other address as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other as provided in this Section. 12. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the parties hereto only by written instrument executed in accordance with the same procedures and formality followed for the execution of this Agreement. 13. Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in their names and behalf and on or as of the date first above written. Owner 360353v6 JBD MU220-5 -1639- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF(i o _ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -4,T' day of _ 20�byA of�3i0Ctzcox¢ye� ,a O er of the property located at Tmound, MN 55364, JOYCE N�LSON \ �1 X16 Notary Publik NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL CITY OF MOUND andis M. Hanson City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c� r day of t� __, 20 %v, by Kandis M. Hanson, the City Manager of the City of Mound, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. NOTARY STAMP OR SEAL THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 360353v6 JBD MU220-5 -1640- Notary ubhc Exhibit A List of Owners and Property Addresses 14-117-24-44-0038 2251 Commerce Blvd JOHN H & PATRICIA R TOMBERS 14-117-24-44-0037 2261 Commerce Blvd DAVID A DETERS TRUSTEE 14-117-24-44-0039 2271 Commerce Blvd FIVE SIGMA LLC 14-117-24-44-0036 2281 Commerce Blvd J E ROYER AND M K ROYER 14-117-2444-0064 14-117-24-44-0042 2313 Commerce Blvd W R NETKA & D E NETKA 14-117-24-44-0001 2321 Commerce Blvd PTS HOLDINGS INC. 14-117-24-44-0002 2339 Commerce Bvld A P MEISEL & P A MEISEL 14-117-24-44-0004 2345 Commerce Blvd KOENIG & SCHWERT II 14-117-24-44-0003 2365 Commerce Blvd A P MEISEL & P A MEISEL 14-117-24-44-0006 85 Address Unassigned A P MEISEL & P A MEISEL 360353v6 JBD MU220-5 -1641 - Ell, Exhibit B NA, r � ! E k r OD\ k k \d ) } \�0\ # # m m ° ° §§ 7 § \ / E/\\m m @ Cl! (R/ E)9S\{ \ \ \ \ } } § \ § § § ) § 0! ;; /o ) ) ) J : ; 2 \ g //j 2 ! 2 G / CC M\! _ z / \ 2 - 2 ) } ƒ e ; ! d ] 2 § § §§ E k § ( )$ | | | | | | @ | ( E E 2 a. ( ( k ) ( k k # � \ \ \ z - , , , � , , , , z !k !! , )) {/ }k \ \ \ - - - -- 643- . Rl7 CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OP ID RA DATE(MNi WILLI21 Business 6uss 17 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Business Insurance Brokers ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Affiliate of Northern Capital HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P.O. Box 9396 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW, Minneapolis MN 55440-9396 Phone:952-996-8818 Fax:952-829-0482 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# INSURED INSURER A: ACUITY 1415<. INSURER B: William & Dorothy Netka 2360 Commerce Blvd. #206 Mound MN 55364-1440 COVERAGES 19 THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES, AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR NSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE MM/00/YYYY DATE MM/p0 LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADF a OCCUR F89393-0 12/01/09 12/01/10 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 11000,000 PREMISES (Ea occurence) $250,000 MUD EXP (Any one nersnn) _ I S 1D; 000 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $ 11000,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 3,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LDC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $3,000,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) S GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT S ANVAUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: ASS $ EXCESS I UMBRELLA LIABILITY OCCUR CLAIMS MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION $ AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXEGUTIV OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) ifYeSTdescribeonder TO LIMITS ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE -EA EMPLOYEE ------ $ SPECIAL PROVISIONS below OTHER E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS I VEHICLES I EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS Insured's Location: 2313 Commerce B1vd.,Mound, MN 55364 City of Mound is named as Additional Insured. Hold Harmless/Waiver of Subrogation applies to City of Mound CGGTICIr ATC un. ncn City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound MN 55364-1687 25 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATIOI, DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR -1644- fgang ,�oR® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE OP ID KA DATE(MM/OC WILLI21 06 17 PR THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED ASA MATTER OF INFORMATION Business Insurance Brokers ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Affiliate of Northern Capital HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P.O. Box 9396 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. Minneapolis MN 55440-9396 Phone:952-996-8818 Fax:952-829-0482 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# NSURED INSURER A: ACUITY 141 A, William & Dorothy Netka INSURER C: 2360 Commerce Blvd. #206 INSURER O: Mound MN 55364-1440 INSURER E' COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR NSR TYPE_ OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER DATE MMIDD/'M'Y DATE MMIDDIVYYY LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE X❑OCCUR F89393-0 12/01/09 12/01/10 EACH OCCCO URRENCE $ 1,000, 000 PMISES (Ea a een ) $250,000 MED EXP(Any one person) _ 510,000 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $1,000,000 GENERALAGGREGATE $ 3,000,000 GENT AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO LOC JECT PRODUCTS COMP/OP AGO $3,000,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS (Ed TINGLE LIMIT accident) $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ GARAGE LIABILITY ANYAUTO AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ AUTOONOTHERTHAN EA ACC AUTO ONLY: AGO $— $ EXCESS / UMBRELLA LIABILITY OCCUR EICLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ S $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y / N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEL:] OFFICERIMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) I( yes, describe underSPECIAL PROVISIONS below TORY LIMITS ER EACH ACCIDENT rE.L. S DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS I LOCATIONS / VEHICLES / EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT I SPECIAL PROVISIONS Insured's Location: 2313 Commerce B1vd.,Mound, MN 55364 City of Mound is named as Additional Insured. Hold Harmless/Waiver of Subrogation applies to City of Mound tart rlrr., lc NVl.uCrt GANGtLLAT1UN SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATIO DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL City of Mound IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR 5341 Maywood Road REPRESENTATIVES. Mound MN 55364-1687 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Pfeifer/Wolfgang ACORD 25 (2009/01) ©1988-2009 ACORIX CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are re istered marks of ACORD - 1645 - If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policyties) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s), If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s), DISCLAIMER This Certificate of Insurance does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon, 011PORLOM • Area • •Improvements- x ;•j i 1 h may•. , -. i • •. F -77M 75 —VC. Crow River State Bank Feature 1 MW IVbund th Wolf Sportswear i Mo!iiod Area in Blue is- 71 1 ,NOT d one •11 .; ♦,may► J ogle Ea 00 fl EXHIBIT D. Lot Repair Cost Allocation by Owner Address PID 2313 Commerce Blvd 1411724440042 2321 Commerce Blvd 1411724440001 2339 Commerce Blvd 1411724440002 2345 Commerce Blvd 1411724440004 2365 Commerce Place 1411724440003 Owner Allocation Gauld, Shawn 10% F ri sco2 LLC c/o Jim Meyers 18% Authur P & Patricia Meisel 30.5% 2345 Commerce Place Blvd LLC c/o Jason Zattler 20.5% A. Paul Meisel 21% � City of Mound - Park Dedication Fees - Community Investment Fund 404 YEAR I REVENUES I EXPENDITURES I CHANGE IN NA I FUND BALANCE Fund Balance - Carry Forward - 2006 160,283.85 2007 11,538.89 126,285.00 (114,746.11) 45,537.74 2008 2,368.78 - 2,368.78 47,906.52 2009 120.87 28,977.10 (28,856.23) 19,050.29 2010 5.08 11,380.34 (11,375.26) 7,675.03 2011 5,408.76 - 5,408.76 13,083.79 2012 13,300.00 26,383.79 (13,083.79) - 2013 26,100.00 25,890.01 209.99 209.99 2014 2,200.00 45.04 2,154.96 2,364.95 2015 3,075.00 - 3,075.00 5,439.95 2016 22,800.00 155.55 22,644.45 28,084.40 2017 69,100.00 - 69,100.00 97,184.40 2018 8,800.00 27,028.98 (18,228.98) 78,955.42 -1649- MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 462.358 462.358 OFFICIAL CONTROLS: SUBDIVISION REGULATION; DEDICATION. Subdivision 1. [Repealed, 1980 c 566 s 35] Subd. la. Authority. To protect and promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, to provide for the orderly, economic, and safe development of land, to preserve agricultural lands, to promote the availability of housing affordable to persons and families of all income levels, and to facilitate adequate provision for transportation, water, sewage, storm drainage, schools, parks, playgrounds, and other public services and facilities, a municipality may by ordinance adopt subdivision regulations establishing standards, requirements, and procedures for the review and approval or disapproval of subdivisions. The regulations may contain varied provisions respecting, and be made applicable only to, certain classes or kinds of subdivisions. The regulations shall be uniform for each class or kind of subdivision. A municipality may by resolution extend the application of its subdivision regulations to unincorporated territory located within two miles of its limits in any direction but not in a town which has adopted subdivision regulations; provided that where two or more noncontiguous municipalities have boundaries less than four miles apart, each is authorized to control the subdivision of land equal distance from its boundaries within this area. Subd. 2. [Repealed, 1980 c 566 s 35] Subd. 2a. Terms of regulations. The standards and requirements in the regulations may address without limitation: the size, location, grading, and improvement of lots, structures, public areas, streets, roads, trails, walkways, curbs and gutters, water supply, stone drainage, lighting, sewers, electricity, gas, and other utilities; the planning and design of sites; access to solar energy; and the protection and conservation of floodplains, shore lands, soils, water, vegetation, energy, air quality, and geologic and ecologic features. The regulations shall require that subdivisions be consistent with the municipality's official map if one exists and its zoning ordinance, and may require consistency with other official controls and the comprehensive plan. The regulations may prohibit certain classes or kinds of subdivisions in areas where prohibition is consistent with the comprehensive plan and the purposes of this section, particularly the preservation of agricultural lands. The regulations may prohibit, restrict or control development for the purpose of protecting and assuring access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The regulations may prohibit the issuance of permits or approvals for any tracts, lots, or parcels for which required subdivision approval has not been obtained. The regulations may permit the municipality to condition its approval on the construction and installation of sewers, streets, electric, gas, drainage, and water facilities, and similar utilities and improvements or, in lieu thereof, on the receipt by the municipality of a cash deposit, certified check, irrevocable letter of credit, bond, or other financial security in an amount and with surety and conditions sufficient to assure the municipality that the utilities and improvements will be constructed or installed according to the specifications of the municipality. Sections 471.345 and 574.26 do not apply to improvements made by a subdivider or a subdivider's contractor. A municipality may require that an applicant establish an escrow account or other financial security for the purpose of reimbursing the municipality for direct costs relating to professional services provided during the review, approval and inspection of the project. A municipality may only charge the applicant a rate equal to the value of the service to the municipality. Services provided by municipal staff or contract professionals must be billed at an established rate. When the applicant vouches, by certified letter to the municipality, that the conditions required by the municipality for approval under this subdivision have been satisfied, the municipality has 30 days to release Copyright © 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1650- 462.358 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 and return to the applicant any and all financial securities tied to the requirements. If the municipality fails to release and return the letters of credit within the 30 -day period, any interest accrued will be paid to the applicant. If the municipality determines that the conditions required for approval under this subdivision have not been satisfied, the municipality must send written notice within seven business days upon receipt of the certified letter indicating to the applicant which specific conditions have not been met. The municipality shall require a maintenance or performance bond from any subcontractor that has not yet completed all remaining requirements of the municipality. The regulations may permit the municipality to condition its approval on compliance with other requirements reasonably related to the provisions of the regulations and to execute development contracts embodying the terms and conditions of approval. The municipality may enforce such agreements and conditions by appropriate legal and equitable remedies. Subd. 2b. Dedication. (a) The regulations may require that a reasonable portion of the buildable land, as defined by municipal ordinance, of any proposed subdivision be dedicated to the public or preserved for public use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements, parks, recreational facilities as defined in section 471.191, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space. The requirement must be imposed by ordinance or under the procedures established in section 462.353, subdivision 4a. (b) If a municipality adopts the ordinance or proceeds under section 462.353, subdivision 4a, as required by paragraph (a), the municipality must adopt a capital improvement budget and have a parks and open space plan or have a parks, trails, and open space component in its comprehensive plan subject to the terms and conditions in this paragraph and paragraphs (c) to (i). (c) The municipality may choose to accept a cash fee as set by ordinance from the applicant for some or all of the new lots created in the subdivision, based on the average fair market value of the unplatted land for which park fees have not already been paid that is, no later than at the time of final approval or under the city's adopted comprehensive plan, to be served by municipal sanitary sewer and water service or community septic and private well as authorized by state law. For purposes of redevelopment on developed land, the municipality may choose to accept a cash fee based on fair market value of the land no later than the time of final approval. "Fair marketvalue" means the value of the land as determined by the municipality annually based on tax valuation or other relevant data. If the municipality's calculation of valuation is objected to by the applicant, then the value shall be as negotiated between the municipality and the applicant, or based on the market value as determined by the municipality based on an independent appraisal of land in a same or similar land use category. (d) In establishing the portion to be dedicated or preserved or the cash fee, the regulations shall give due consideration to the open space, recreational, or common areas and facilities open to the public that the applicant proposes to reserve for the subdivision. (e) The municipality must reasonably determine that it will need to acquire that portion of land for the purposes stated in this subdivision as a result of approval of the subdivision. (f) Cash payments received must be placed by the municipality in a special fund to be used only for the purposes for which the money was obtained. (g) Cash payments received must be used only for the acquisition and development or improvement of parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space based on the approved park systems plan. Cash payments must not be used for ongoing operation or maintenance of parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space. Copyright © 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1651 - MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 462.358 (h) The municipality must not deny the approval of a subdivision based solely on an inadequate supply of parks, open spaces, trails, or recreational facilities within the municipality. (i) Previously subdivided property from which a park dedication has been received, being resubdivided with the same number of lots, is exempt from park dedication requirements. If, as a result of resubdividing the property, the number of lots is increased, then the park dedication or per -lot cash fee must apply only to the net increase of lots. Subd. 2c. Nexus. (a) There must be an essential nexus between the fees or dedication imposed under subdivision 2b and the municipal purpose sought to be achieved by the fee or dedication. The fee or dedication must bear a rough proportionality to the need created by the proposed subdivision or development. (b) If a municipality is given written notice of a dispute over a proposed fee in lieu of dedication before the municipality's final decision on an application, a municipality must not condition the approval of any proposed subdivision or development on an agreement to waive the right to challenge the validity of a fee in lieu of dedication. (c) An application may proceed as if the fee had been paid, pending a decision on the appeal of a dispute over a proposed fee in lieu of dedication, if (1) the person aggrieved by the fee puts the municipality on written notice of a dispute over a proposed fee in lieu of dedication, (2) prior to the municipality's final decision on the application, the fee in lieu of dedication is deposited in escrow, and (3) the person aggrieved by the fee appeals under section 462.361, within 60 days of the approval of the application. If such an appeal is not filed by the deadline, or if the person aggrieved by the fee does not prevail on the appeal, then the funds paid into escrow must be transferred to the municipality. Subd. 3. [Repealed, 1980 c 566 s 35] Subd. 3a. Platting. The regulations may require that any subdivision creating parcels, tracts, or lots, shall be platted. The regulations shall require that all subdivisions which create five or more lots or parcels which are 2-1/2 acres or less in size shall be platted. The regulations shall not conflict with the provisions of chapter 505 but may address subjects similar and additional to those in that chapter. Subd. 3b. Review procedures. The regulations shall include provisions regarding the content of applications for proposed subdivisions, the preliminary and final review and approval or disapproval of applications, and the coordination of such reviews with affected political subdivisions and state agencies. Subdivisions including lands abutting upon any existing or proposed trunk highway, county road or highway, or county state -aid highway shall also be subject to review. The regulations may provide for the consolidation of the preliminary and final review and approval or disapproval of subdivisions. Preliminary or final approval may be granted or denied for parts of subdivision applications. The regulations may delegate the authority to review proposals to the planning commission, but final approval or disapproval shall be the decision of the governing body of the municipality unless otherwise provided by law or charter. A municipality must approve a preliminary plat that meets the applicable standards and criteria contained in the municipality's zoning and subdivision regulations unless the municipality adopts written findings based on a record from the public proceedings why the application shall not be approved. The regulations shall require that a public hearing shall be held on all subdivision applications prior to preliminary approval, unless otherwise provided by law or charter. The hearing shall be held following publication of notice of the time and place thereof in the official newspaper at least ten days before the day of the hearing. At the hearing, all persons interested shall be given an opportunity to make presentations. A subdivision application shall be preliminarily approved or disapproved within 120 days following delivery of an application completed in compliance with the municipal ordinance by the applicant to the municipality, unless an extension of the review period has been Copyright © 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1652- 462.358 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 agreed to by the applicant. When a division or subdivision to which the regulations of the municipality do not apply is presented to the city, the clerk of the municipality shall within ten days certify that the subdivision regulations of the municipality do not apply to the particular division. If the municipality or the responsible agency of the municipality fails to preliminarily approve or disapprove an application within the review period, the application shall be deemed preliminarily approved, and upon demand the municipality shall execute a certificate to that effect Following preliminary approval the applicant may request final approval by the municipality, and upon such request the municipality shall certify final approval within 60 days if the applicant has complied with all conditions and requirements of applicable regulations and all conditions and requirements upon which the preliminary approval is expressly conditioned either through performance or the execution of appropriate agreements assuring performance. If the municipality fails to certify final approval as so required, and if the applicant has complied with all conditions and requirements, the application shall be deemed finally approved, and upon demand the municipality shall execute a certificate to that effect. After final approval a subdivision may be filed or recorded. Subd. 3c. Effect of subdivision approval. For one year following preliminary approval and for two years following final approval, unless the subdivider and the municipality agree otherwise, no amendment to a comprehensive plan or official control shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or dedication or platting required or permitted by the approved application. Thereafter, pursuant to its regulations, the municipality may extend the period by agreement with the subdivider and subject to all applicable performance conditions and requirements, or it may require submission of a new application unless substantial physical activity and investment has occurred in reasonable reliance on the approved application and the subdivider will suffer substantial financial damage as a consequence of a requirement to submit a new application. In connection with a subdivision involving planned and staged development, a municipality may by resolution or agreement grant the rights referred to herein for such periods of time longer than two years which it determines to be reasonable and appropriate. Subd. 4. [Repealed, 1982 c 415 s 3] Subd. 4a. Disclosure by seller; buyer's action for damages. Aperson conveying a new parcel of land which, or the plat for which, has not previously been filed or recorded, and which is part of or would constitute a subdivision to which adopted municipal subdivision regulations apply, shall attach to the instrument of conveyance either: (a) recordable certification by the clerk of the municipality that the subdivision regulations do not apply, or that the subdivision has been approved by the governing body, or that the restrictions on the division of taxes and filing and recording have been waived by resolution of the governing body of the municipality in this case because compliance will create an unnecessary hardship and failure to comply will not interfere with the purpose of the regulations; or (b) a statement which names and identifies the location of the appropriate municipal offices and advises the grantee that municipal subdivision and zoning regulations may restrict the use or restrict or prohibit the development of the parcel, or construction on it, and that the division of taxes and the filing or recording of the conveyance may be prohibited without prior recordable certification of approval, nonapplicability, or waiver from the municipality. In any action commenced by a buyer of such a parcel against the seller thereof, the misrepresentation of or the failure to disclose material facts in accordance with this subdivision shall be grounds for damages. If the buyer establishes a right to damages, a district court hearing the matter may in its discretion also award to the buyer an amount sufficient to pay all or any part of the costs incurred in maintaining the action, including reasonable attorney fees, and an amount for punitive damages not exceeding five per centum of the purchase price of the land. Subd. 4b. Restrictions on filing and recording conveyances. (a) In a municipality in which subdivision regulations are in force and have been filed or recorded as provided in this section, no conveyance of land Copyright © 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1653- MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 462.358 to which the regulations are applicable shall be filed or recorded, if the land is described in the conveyance by metes and bounds or by reference to an unapproved registered land survey made after April 21, 1961 or to an unapproved plat made after such regulations become effective. (b) The foregoing provision does not apply to a conveyance if the land described: (1) was a separate parcel of record April 1, 1945 or the date of adoption of subdivision regulations under Laws 1945, chapter 287, whichever is the later, or of the adoption of subdivision regulations pursuant to a home rule charter, or or (2) was the subject of a written agreement to convey entered into prior to such time, or (3) was a separate parcel of not less than 2-1/2 acres in area and 150 feet in width on January 1, 1966, (4) was a separate parcel of not less than five acres in area and 300 feet in width on July 1, 1980, or (5) is a single parcel of commercial or industrial land of not less than five acres and having a width of not less than 300 feet and its conveyance does not result in the division of the parcel into two or more lots or parcels, any one of which is less than five acres in area or 300 feet in width, or (6) is a single parcel of residential or agricultural land of not less than 20 acres and having a width of not less than 500 feet and its conveyance does not result in the division of the parcel into two or more lots or parcels, any one of which is less than 20 acres in area or 500 feet in width. (c) In any case in which compliance with the foregoing restrictions will create an unnecessary hardship and failure to comply does not interfere with the purpose of the subdivision regulations, the platting authority may waive such compliance by adoption of a resolution to that effect and the conveyance may then be filed or recorded. (d) Any owner or agent of the owner of land who conveys a lot or parcel in violation of the provisions of this subdivision shall forfeit and pay to the municipality a penalty of not less than $100 for each lot or parcel so conveyed. (e) A municipality may enjoin such conveyance or may recover such penalty by a civil action in any court of competent jurisdiction. Subd. 5. Permits. Except as otherwise provided by this section all electric and gas distribution lines or piping, roadways, curbs, walks and other similar improvements shall be constructed only on a street, alley, or other public way or easement which is designated on an approved plat, or properly indicated on the official map of the municipality, or which has otherwise been approved by the governing body. When a municipality has adopted an official map, no permit for the erection of any building shall be issued unless the building is to be located upon a parcel of land abutting on a street or highway which has been designated upon an approved plat or on the official map or which has been otherwise approved by the governing body, and unless the buildings conform to the established building line. This limitation on issuing permits shall not apply to planned developments approved by the governing body pursuant to its zoning ordinance. No permit shall be issued for the construction of a building on any lot or parcel conveyed in violation of the provisions of this section. Subd. 6. Variances. Subdivision regulations may provide for a procedure for varying the regulations as they apply to specific properties where an unusual hardship on the land exists, but variances may be Copyright © 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1654- 462.358 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2017 6 granted only upon the specific grounds set forth in the regulations. Unusual hardship includes, but is not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Subd. 7. Vacation. The governing body of a municipality may vacate any publicly owned utility easement or boulevard reserve or any portion thereof, which are not being used for sewer, drainage, electric, telegraph, telephone, gas and steam purposes or for boulevard reserve purposes, in the same manner as vacation proceedings are conducted for streets, alleys and other public ways under a home rule charter or other provisions of law. A boulevard reserve means an easement established adjacent to a dedicated street for the purpose of establishing open space adjacent to the street and which area is designated on the recorded plat as "boulevard reserve". Subd. 8. Plat approval under other laws. Nothing in this section is to be construed as a limitation on the authority of municipalities which have not adopted subdivision regulations to approve plats under any other provision of law. Subd. 9. Unplatted parcels. Subdivision regulations adopted by municipalities may apply to parcels which are taken from existing parcels of record by metes and bounds descriptions, and the governing body or building authority may deny the issuance of permits or approvals, building permits issued under sections 326B.101 to 326B.194, or other permits or approvals to any parcels so divided, pending compliance with subdivision regulations. Subd. 10. Limitations. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a municipality to regulate subdivisions or to regulate all subdivisions which it is authorized to regulate by this section. Subd. 11. Affordable housing. For the purposes of this subdivision, a "development application" means subdivision, planned unit development, site plan, or other similar type action. If a municipality, in approving a development application that provides all or a portion of the units for persons and families of low and moderate income, so proposes, the applicant may request that provisions authorized by clauses (1) to (4) will apply to housing for persons of low and moderate income, subject to agreement between the municipality and the applicant: (1) establishing sales prices or rents for housing affordable to low- and moderate -income households; (2) establishing maximum income limits for initial and subsequent purchasers or renters of the affordable units; (3) establishing means, including, but not limited to, equity sharing, or similar activities, to maintain the long-term affordability of the affordable units; and (4) establishing a land trust agreement to maintain the long-term affordability of the affordable units. Clauses (1) to (3) shall not apply for more than 20 years from the date of initial occupancy except where public financing or subsidy requires longer terms. History: 1965 c 670 s 8; 1971 c 842 s 1; 1973 c 67 s 1; 1973 c 176 s 1; 1975 c 98 s 1; 1976 c 181 s 2; 1978 c 786 s 16,17; 1980 c 560 s 6; 1980 c 566 s 25-33; 1981 c 85 s 7; 1982 c 415 s 2; 1982 c 507 s 23; 1985 c 194 s 24; 1986 c 444; 1989 c 196 s 1; 1989 c 200 s 1; 1989 c 209 art 2 s 1; 1995 c 254 art 1 s 90; art 3 s 6,7; 2000 c 497 s 1; 2001 c 7 s 74; 2002 c 315 s 1; 2004 c 178 s 2,3; 2006 c 209 s 1; 2006 c 269 s 1; 2006 c 270 art 1 s 6; 2007 c 116 s 1; 2007 c 140 art 4 s 61; art 13 s 4; 2013 c 85 art 5 s 41 Copyright © 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. -1655- Harbor Wine & Spirits June 2018 Date Weather Cust 18 Cust 17 Variance 2018 2017 Difference +/- 6/1/2018 ovrest to 80s 630 386 244 15873.75 9176.35 6697.4 6/2/2018 pt sun hi 70s 428 715 -287 11030.01 18889.55 -7859.54 6/3/2018 sun 80 271 710 -439 5301.73 20651.93 -15350.2 6/4/2018 sun 80 302 302 5133.58 5133.58 6/5/2018 sun 80 310 315 -5 6934.2 6827.02 107.18 6/6/2018 sun 80 312 364 -52 6451.58 6452.67 -1.09 6/7/2018 sun 80 347 365 -18 8906.37 10464.38 -1558.01 6/8/2018 sun 80 573 361 212 14851.59 7711.81 7139.78 6/9/2018 sun hi 70s 456 665 -209 12465.15 18340.26 -5875.11 6/10/2018 ovrest to 80s 306 730 -424 6583.3 20744.56 -14161.26 6/11/2018 stormy 80 564 564 4664.33 4664.33 6/12/2018 humid 84 341 282 59 7029.89 5612.03 1417.86 6/13/2018 sun 80 376 341 35 9160.2 7230.34 1929.86 6/14/2018 sun hi 70s 402 319 83 8901.66 6579.75 2321.91 6/15/2018 SUN 90 661 407 254 18136.09 9269.25 8866.84 6/16/2018 pt rain hi 80s 612 631 -19 16936.93 15996.3 940.63 6/17/2018 pt rain hi 80s 336 712 -376 6893.14 19748.14 12855 6/18/2018 pt rain to 80s 285 285 6004.23 6004.23 6/19/2018 It rain 75 283 295 -12 6246.5 5639.34 607.16 6/20/2018 pt sun 81 323 361 -38 6661.57 8384.02 -1722.45 6/21/2018 sun 83 342 356 -14 7695.45 8277.43 -581.98 6/22/2018 SUN 85 630 354 276 17203.87 8642.28 8561.59 6/23/2018 PT SUN 85 609 658 -49 15479.24 17239.06 -1759.82 6/24/2018 CLDY 83 274 623 -349 5687.31 17354.43 -11667.12 6/25/2018 pt sun 82 279 279 5761.68 5761.68 6/26/2018 cldy 80 332 321 11 7398.58 6999.59 398.99 6/27/2018 humid 80s 433 364 69 10095.2 7296.41 2798.79 6/28/2018 pt sun 80 354 310 44 8763.08 7248.8 1514.28 6/29/2018 humid hi 80s 709 379 330 19315.76 9889.98 9425.78 . 6/30/2018 humid sun 80 607 702 -95 15842.86 20287.5 -4444.64 TOTALS 12687 11555 1132 297408.8 301053.2 -3644.37 -1656- Harbor Wine & Spirits July 2018 Date Weather Cust 18 Cust 17 Variance 2018 2017 Difference +/- `"" 7/1/2018 rain pt sun 80 262 668 -406 6087.33 20409.72 -14322.39 7/2/2018 sun 83 386 477 -91 9853.94 12836.59 -2982.65 7/3/2018 sun/rain 80s 711 721 -10 21339.45 21418.47 -79.02 7/4/2018 sun/rain 80s 593 576 17 17056.22 13443.71 3612.51 7/5/2018 SUN 78 336 250 86 7256.74 5328.6 1928.14 7/6/2018 SUN 80 573 356 217 13796.38 7829.55 5966.83 7/7/2018 sun hi 80s 612 632 -20 16291.72 15513.92 777.8 7/8/2018 sun hi 80s 318 647 -329 6513.77 17737.75 -11223.98 7/9/2018 sun mid 80s 291 285 6 6146.14 6359.56 -213.42 7/10/2018 sun mid 80s 338 316 22 7350.65 5947.63 1403.02 7/11/2018 sun hi 80s 355 384 -29 7378.82 8191.64 -812.82 7/12/2018 sun/rain 95 350 331 19 7188.4 7393.11 -204.71 7/13/2018 sun 90 595 338 257 15876.7 8540.7 7336 7/14/2018 sun humid 80s 652 675 -23 16959.57 18058 -1098.43 7/15/2018 sun 80s 307 707 -400 7804.35 19448.63 -11644.28 7/16/2018 sun hi 80s 303 312 -9 7585.81 6724.07 861.74 7/17/2018 sun 80s 362 338 24 8497.55 7319.45 1178.1 7/18/2018 sun 80s 339 331 8 7911.64 7601.57 310.07 7/19/2018 pt rain 80s 348 641 -293 8654.87 8099.69 555.18 7/20/2018 ovrest/rain 642 402 240 18276.13 9449.14 8826.99 7/21/2018 sun mid 80s 775 713 62 18059.72 21544.88 -3485.16 7/22/2018 sun mid 80s 305 783 -478 7057.48 22375.21 -15317.73 7/23/2018 sun mid 80s 276 268 8 5106.92 5442.39 -335.47 7/24/2018 sun 80s 367 301 66 7243.77 5888.61 1355.16 7/25/2018 sun Io 80s 326 349 -23 6831.96 7277.95 -445.99 7/26/2018 sun mid 80s 374 314 60 10228.8 7377.41 2851.39 7/27/2018 sun mid 80s 674 405 269 18944.4 10713.82 8230.58 7/28/2018 sun mid 80s 628 648 -20 14988.72 18136.08 -3147.36 7/29/2018 sun mid 80s 286 610 -324 6640.74 17906.18 -11265.44 7/30/2018 sun 87 326 297 29 6540.98 6384.65 156.33 7/31/2018 sun 80s 352 318 34 7015.29 7239.27 -223.98 TOTALS 13010 14093 -1083 326485 357938 -31453.04 -1657- a7N d7NMN V M(pO t0 M r N �-h V mON W O) V OO N N O of r O) O V V M O N M J (") N N - N lD (V N m (h M M N M M (D O V A t0 D �- 7 V O V W O M M N O h O OO V N M Q� O M O (O V M M M N r N O OJ N r W b N M O 0 M M M r N O 0 V r 41 T �- O r W O N M V N r M M M O r V r O N N N O .- r V O mm O W O r Ow } Q OO U1 O OD N N V N a V [O t0 h M N M O Nm WN V N N N O Vcli (6 N n N to N N N O V N M M 1p O �- f0 N r O N t0 V M Of N r C6.6 M M [O M N V m O M N O V m t0 (O O W M c M F M W Nmr OOr O N N h r � N N A W Ar OO N N M N � W uJ N OJ V N N r V N r V OJ M (O O O (p N N 10 r W W am (O N m N M M m O r M l0 N O r N N (O N O W U ro M W N N r r C (6,6 r M r V O M r O O) h Z N O O N V O N m m w V 0 a0 N N O M r N O M O O N O (O O M N (O N M N N OJ M (O CO (O Q) O V m m r m N N (D IO V V M N O O O N Z m N (A N N N A M M O ro N FO W m N N N r W W m u'1 to N W N V M O OO (O Ol V t0 N N 7 O 0 W r V O O N r h V v N M m N O) O V N I Mo N N W (O (V N M N M N W N N N W J W V OOOtOOOOOON O OD OO V OOODOO ' O N O V O O O O O O r 0 M M O N O O O m O H W I N N M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M m O O m of N r t0 On O t0 r On C9 (OO N N V N M V M O (V N M M N V O N M N O M N r N N M D m N y N a N E � � � N C a N � z J C 7 « N y LL UV T N O .D x j _ w �w m J z �_ 07�tn 5� E r a"i ma7aJ LL U QQ� N c m O� 2'1: w U N U in Q LL Y H N N O E i � z-mz_=c�U LL InNLLH� =Qor-moi �n E xcn w O O 0 -1658- O) N O M N M - M M( W O) M � M N M t[l O - W NZ Y W X = W N O r N N N O N R rn O V O r V N rn 0 r ro rn (O O V M Nr In �- (D (6 1:16 O a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Orn M O r rn N V N M 9 (O r r M OO (O S O N O fn N 'n h rn (O V V t0 M N (O t0 O N V 10 fp (O V e - O M ((1 V V 4 O h h N M M M O rn C - (D r N4 V N O N r :-V N V N N M M rn �-rn�-rorn N�- C(ON rNN N V N m o- (hO (rO N r M (00 r r tN0 W Obi O O W� C0 M M h N 1lO ro (6 x 0 0 0 6 .6m a m to6 ro(ov-Oro M -: lO t0 M CJ M N N r N (O M M m eN VJ�� V'(OM�v�Mrorrnln rn rn (ov v rnrn (DMrnrn oln to M Mo NN- rn ro o rn M rn ^ O l') N M M W (O W A M N M M 10 10 V O U�1 O V N O O O O M M� Ornl N� T O r O rn ro 10 O 0) 6 O W O) . «1 -Z V .610 O M r M (O (O 10 a0 N .- re- v'-�� r vmu�ln V O V .- O" W O N M •- O N N N rn M O M N 16 V V M t V M cO r m 16 N rn r N M M m roo m vh (p 03M N N of M N M O V V W rn - N M M h N M ro r r rn rn v v r V N s{ NCO (O rnM M V rnh N rn O O N M N tO N t(J 'O M r N O V lO N N M M co 16 .6 ro m m v ri m co In of r' N 0 0 o R R R R R a o h o N (D r O Q) rn (O r N Oi M v of � c6 r N �ro r Ntp tO 1p OO V tOONOO M(OO N srro0 V M N rn V rn6O <n OO N �Qoi r ��ml� N m r N N (NOO lroOmnO V Z � H r N m r d V N M� M Obi ro•-v>(o rn V 1nN 1nMM m 7 ro r ro N V rn M N 16 r (O r M M r N h V N V h W N M r Yl r (O O .N- (O M M W NZ Y W X = W N O r N N N O N R rn O V O r V N rn 0 r ro rn (O O V M Nr In �- (D (6 1:16 O a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Orn M O r rn N V N M 9 (O r r M OO (O S O N O fn N 'n h rn (O V V t0 M N (O t0 O N V 10 fp (O V e - O M ((1 V V 4 O h h N M M M O rn C - (D r N4 V N O N r :-V N V N N M M rn �-rn�-rorn N�- C(ON rNN N V N m o- (hO (rO N r M (00 r r tN0 W Obi O O W� C0 M M h N 1lO ro (6 x 0 0 0 6 .6m a m to6 ro(ov-Oro M -: lO t0 M CJ M N N r N (O M M m eN VJ�� V'(OM�v�Mrorrnln rn rn (ov v rnrn (DMrnrn oln to M Mo NN- rn ro o rn M rn ^ O l') N M M W (O W A M N M M 10 10 V O U�1 O V N O O O O M M� Ornl N� T O r O rn ro 10 O 0) 6 O W O) . «1 -Z V .610 O M r M (O (O 10 a0 N .- re- v'-�� r vmu�ln V O V .- O" W O N M •- O N N N rn M O M N 16 V V M t V M cO r m 16 N rn r N M M m roo m vh (p 03M N N of M N M O V V W rn - N M M h N M ro r r rn rn v v r V N s{ NCO (O rnM M V rnh N rn O O N M N tO N t(J 'O M r N O V lO N N M M co 16 .6 ro m m v ri m co In of r' N 0 0 o R R R R R a o h o N (D r O Q) rn (O r N Oi M v of � c6 r N �ro r Ntp tO 1p oMo mrn o lno M N rn V rn6O <n OO N [O h O T N hM m N tDro rn M r m M N m r N N M O V M N rn ro ro ro v � H r N m r d V N M� M Obi ro•-v>(o rn V 1nN 1nMM m r ro N V rn M N oMo mrn o lno M o o r h N (n o r r o (D 10 rn W (P rn M h ro ro N � M O V M N rn ro V N rn M N V � � N N R C N C p C N N O U N.0 c c R T a � 2 N O T T y D c m m m = N ' d O N N n 7=R MH (h Z 2 MOO LL iRN d EZE"d c c O �°qNmO:OoER mRo ood Q $Eu o(LoWLQ�1 QOF- Um)o m z w f C7 O -1659- o M N m 0 m v v m m m 0 a m N m m M M M1 e m N m v n M N W Om O m n m n� O N m N n m (p m -' W N W N O M m n N N N n N m O m O O m W n n V O M O M mM0 NC NMOM V N O N OI n N O N N N M W h m h Ol N W W V W V W No N N, INNV M m N N V O N v Z F O } ry M O WM n m W N O N OM1 <O m n O (D m N N n ZK Q ovio�vNM n��vn�-- (ON � _oM�N 0 F N O � W m LL i H O N l0 M -� 10(I N M O ChJ n m W N O N N T h (a0 W M O N 001 N N m m N '- N O N N U O. O_ O_ M_ O_ M_ N_ N_ N_ 1� M_ n M_ n_ M_ V N m N M M N M N M N N N O N N V N (O O (0 d' O d' O V O M M N m^ M V 01 A moM1�o NN Novonm,M W o1 Nm mm ' cnwm�N(V M_ 1 r_ V_ I m_ cm"1_ V_ N_ v N N O M n M m m N N m m W ONl n (D m V N M O N m (p m I.. VNM n V m r m 1n r V N N a N N m � C m N M N mJ_ ONi_ n_ V_ a O y 2 m N Z caaaa ami m. - o C N N N N N N N r � O ,� � � 0 0 o c E m A V 2jEEEEGCCCO p1�GCCNNN�NO� I _Tv D N N m m v OOm0 X`C1l 'o' m DCm oDOO O d P dN yC O 3 N C d LL N 'h _E E E _E F t10 E EEK K F �v U E 8" m d o i, E Q m v o , 0000000000000 O m m o w= m m Q w O c L9 F -, U' U1 C7 C7 U' U' U' U' U' U' U' C7 U' 002ow yJ Xy- O N m m .- -1660- MINUTES MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 1, 2018 Chair Penner called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. ROLL CALL Members present: Chair Cindy Penner; Commissioners Jason Baker, Dean Bussey, David Goode, Jake Saystrom, Jameson Smieja, and Jennifer Peterson. Absent: David Pelka and Philip Velsor. Staff present: Community Development Director Sarah Smith, Consultant Planner Rita Trapp, and Secretary Jill Norlander. Members of the public: Steven Matheson, 4944 Crestview Rd; Cleo Pierce, 1713 Bluebird La; Robert Pierce, 1741 Bluebird La; Andrew Spilseth, 326 Ridgeview Dr, Wayzata; T Cody Turnquist, 2000 Chestnut Rd, Hamel; Michael Lattery, 1720 Dove La; Johann Chemin, 6039 Beachwood Rd; Jackson Hall, 1681 Avocet La; Kelli Gillispie Coen, 4400 Tuxedo Blvd; Jane Anderson, 5060 Edgewater Dr; Danelle Bonilla, 5142 Waterbury Rd; Cate Fossing, 5970 Hillcrest Rd; Doug Dahm, 5108 Edgewater Dr; Geoff Mills, 2008 Clover Cir; Patrick Seibert, 3140 Westedge Blvd; Connie Szarke, 1956 Shorewood La; Kathy Rice, 2044 Arbor La; Ron Hendley, 2611 Setter Cir; Joe Bruns, 2630 Setter Cir; Merlin & Connie Woytke, 1701 Bluebird La; Marie Jorland, 2313 Norwood La; Ralph Kempf, 4363 Wilshire Blvd A310; Lance Bondhus, 3628 Nicollet Ave; Mpls; Kevin Mach, 2115 Pillsbury Ave, Mpls; Patricia McGrath, 4907 Wilshire Blvd F211; Beau Myhre, 4501 Wilshire Blvd; Doug Murphy, 4505 Wilshire Blvd; Joe Grunnet, 1952 Shorewood La; Heidi & Jon Theis, 2996 Bluffs Dr; Arlyn Anderson, 3033 Brighton Commons; Tim Olson, 2672 N Saunders Lake Dr, Minnetrista; Skipp LaJoy, 4853 Plymouth Rd; Nancy Nachreiner, 2949 Oaklawn La; Leslie Johnson, 3020 Highland Blvd; Christopher & Pamela Getz, 3032 Highland Blvd; Alex & Cassy Hubler, 5824 Grandview Blvd; Leanne Kelly, 1712 Baywood Shores Dr; Joanie Zielinski, 5000 Edgewater Dr; Scott Owens, 5869 Idlewood Rd; Gail Reimer, 4639 Manchester Rd; Frank Nelson, 5962 Lynwood Blvd; Kevin Johansen, 2148 Basswood La; Molly Regenfuss, 2307 Fairview La; Timothy Bowers, 2200 Commerce Blvd; Rose Hatecke, 5420 Main St E, Maple Plain; Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Rd; Rebecca A K -Toth, 2116 Noble La; Cheryl Burghardt, 6440 Painters Cir, Minnetrista. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Smith requested to include an additional page of minutes (Item 4B) and 2 emails (Item 5C) MOTION by Goode, second by Bussey, to approve the agenda as amended. MOTION carried unanimously. REVIEW OF MARCH 6, MARCH 20, AND APRIL 16, 2018 MEETING MINUTES MOTION by Smieja, second by Bussey, to approve the March 6, 2018 meeting minutes as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. -1661 - Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 MOTION by Smieja, second by Goode, to approve the March 20, 2018 meeting minutes as presented. MOTION carried unanimously. MOTION by Peterson, second by Bussey, to table review of the April 16, 2018 minutes until the next meeting. MOTION carried unanimously. BOARD OF APPEALS A. Public Hearing — Text Amendment to 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan Create Mixed Use Land Use Category Trapp introduced the amendment items A and B together as they are related and will be considered together. Mixed use classification supports a variety of commercial, residential, and public uses. Trapp stated that the proposed 2030 amendment must be submitted and determined complete for processing to the Metropolitan Council before July 1, 2018. The requested amendment is specifically for the parcel in question to enable the owner flexibility until the 2040 Comp Plan goes into effect. The property owner was involved in the 2040 Comp Plan process. Trapp went on to explain the 2030 Comp Plan mixed-use districts compared to the 2040 Plan and the approach used in guiding this particular property. Trapp referred to the packet for the "Wilshire -Tuxedo" district page and indicated that it would be similar to what would be inserted into the 2040 Plan for consistency with the rest of the plan. The first item on the agenda would be to amend the 2030 Plan to create this district. The second item applies this district to the particular property on Wilshire Boulevard. This would be the guiding document for reviewing any future amendments. Decisions should not be based on a particular design concept presented. This is a long-range document and will be applicable whether or not this person owns the property into the future. At this stage this is only the Comprehensive Plan portion of the process. At some point the property will need to be rezoned. For Mound, the mixed-use designation does not mean that every project has to include residential and commercial; it could be one or the other or both in the mixed-use area. This designation provides flexibility for property owners to find a good fit for this small property. The specific request was routed thru staff and agencies. Hennepin County wanted to be a participant in future planning, particularly related to Wilshire. No other comments or concerns received. Trapp confirmed that the Wilshire property is currently guided in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as medium density residential and zoned B2. Bussey pointed out that staff reference to Figure 4.3 should actually be Figure 4.4. Bussey asked how size of the mixed use designated parcel is dictated and how staff feels about this approach since it feels like spot zoning. Trapp noted that the current situation is unusual as -1662- Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 there is a time limit for 2030 Comprehensive Plan amendments and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan will not be implemented until mid -2019. This is being framed up this way so it can seamlessly go into the 2040 Plan which is already out for review. Bussey asked what the future rezoning will be for this property. Trapp said that it depends on what is proposed. It's hard to predict at this time. Smieja confirmed that mixed use could be all residential or all commercial or a mix to give the property owner flexibility. Smieja wanted to know the difference between townhomes and multi -family homes. Trapp said that townhomes generally have individual entries vs. multi -family generally has single entries with hallways. Baker asked why the whole point isn't mixed-use. Trapp indicated that for this type of amendment it needs to be requested by the applicant and that property owner did not request the re -guiding. Baker pointed out that the "existing land use" in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows those parcels as white (no designation). Trapp will review for accuracy and noted the site is currently vacant. Bussey asked about the topography affecting design options. Trapp said that there is some topography going from side to side and it is a little more challenging site for drainage and parking. Saystrom asked what the difference is between neighborhood commercial and mixed use. Trapp said the neighborhood commercial allows a variety of retail and office uses that have a neighborhood scale. They are located along collector and arterial roadways to minimize the impact on the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Mixed use opens up the door for some residential on the property. T. Cody Turnquist, son of owner Rolf Turnquist, thanked staff for their assistance and presentation. . Turnquist stated that it is their intention to combine the 2 parcels into 1. They want to utilize topography and minimize impacts to the site. The preliminary concept being explored is an 18 unit multi -family building with a business or retail component possible. The property would be under the 35 foot height maximum with about 65% of the site left open for green space. The hope is to keep the existing tree line intact. Smieja asked if they had any vision for the mixed use. Turnquist said that B2 zoning has not generated any interest in the past marketing. They see it as more residential but there may be a potential for a small destination commercial space like a professional or medical office Bussey asked if they had received any comments from neighbors. Turnquist said that the calls they had received were as a response to the marketing of the property. -1663- Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 Rodney Beystrom, 4466 Denbigh Road, asked if it would be rental or privately -owned condos. Turnquist indicated that at this time it is thought that the project would be rental. Kelli Gillispie Coen, 4400 Tuxedo Boulevard, noted that she is adjacent to the property and has no objections. The market study done several years ago indicated a need for more housing and this is very applicable. Doug Murphy, 4505 Wilshire Boulevard, wanted to know why Mound would consider another multi -family project. Murphy listed several existing apartment complexes in and outside of Mound. He's against it. Rental doesn't care about the community. Why should the developer's difficulties drive the change? It's a big negative for him. Patricia McGrath, 4407 Wilshire Boulevard, stated that the trees cover over the height of most of the area development. This property is right in the middle of quite a busy road. She doesn't see why it needs to be 3 stories. There's no lake access. What's the advantage of being in between 2 roads? Beau Myhre, 4501 Wilshire Boulevard, is a new next door owner. The last thing he wants is to have something that is detrimental to his property or quality of living. Rentals don't sound appealing. He's not sure about the sense of urgency. Myhre is open to something that will be an asset and thinks it needs more discussion. Merle Woytcke, 1701 Bluebird La, thought that Mound is letting developers in that want low income housing. Lower income subsidizes the developers. Lower income residents don't want to work so they steal to make other income. Mound is going to the lower income side of things. We need to take long hard look before we make a decision. It doesn't have to happen today. If it's priced right it will sell. Joe Grunnet, 1952 Shorewood Lane, is troubled by the stereotype that renters are bad. A healthy city has a good mix from all walks of life. It's fair to do the due diligence on the viability of the project and it's not fair to label renters. Heidi Theis, 2996 Bluffs Lane, said the she has lived in 8 states within many different community types. She owns a condo in another state. Not all rentals are bad. Most long-term rental unit occupants do not take care of the unit the way an owner would. Renters get an attitude here in Mound. There is an element here in Mound that say "we need an upgrade". Theis isn't sure rental will bring the town up a level. Doug Murphy, 4505 Wilshire Boulevard, bought his house because the island is single-family or duplex (except Lakewinds). Roger Stephanson, 4601 Island View Drive, asked about the current zoning/guiding. Trapp restated that it is currently guided neighborhood commercial and zoned B2. -1664- Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 Kelli Gillispie, 4400 Tuxedo Boulevard, is a business owner and said that she looked at purchasing the parcel. If zoned strictly commercial, it is not a viable investment. Re -guiding and rezoning gives options. Heidi Theis, 2996 Bluffs Lane, asked about the original zoning when the land was purchased. Theis also asked why it couldn't be re -guided to single-family or duplex. Trapp said that it doesn't lend itself well to single-family due to size and position between 2 busy roads. It also doesn't fit into other city goals. Johann Chemin, 6039 Beachwood Rd, asked to which city goals Trapp was referring. Trapp responded that the city supports a variety of housing mix. More of our options in the city are single family. Chemin wanted to know who gives the guideline to prompt a look at different densities. Trapp stated that the Comp Plan process establishes density. The City Council asked staff to look at the factors: market, existing use, and providing a variety of options. Saystrom clarified with staff that medium density is what it would be with the 2040 Comp Plan. Daniel Bonilla, 5142 Waterbury Road, said the rental housing in Mound has seen better decades. She wants to keep it from becoming a Section 42 area (low incomed housing). Bonilla replied that traffic could be nightmarish with 18 units and 2'/: parking spaces per unit. Merl Woytcke, 1701 Bluebird Lane, felt that if the door is opened tonight it's dangerous because they haven't really told you what they're going to do with the property. If the door is opened it can't be closed. Baker asked staff to clarify the meaning of medium density in the 2040 Comp Plan. Trapp said 7-12 units per acre with the intended housing types to include multi -unit townhomes, four- plexes, and small-scale apartments. The intent would be that this change would be carried forward into the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Figure 4.4. is intended to provide direction on what type of mixed-use would occur. Currently it is proposed to be 8+ units per acre. However, Figure 4.4. could be modified if desired by the Planning Commission. Saystrom said that, as we went through the Comp Plan review, he felt good that we were planning the city and felt they would be taking away from that if they honored the request of 1 property owner based on a personal project. He wants to adhere to the 2040 plan. Baker asked if there was a maximum unit per acre. Trapp restated that 8+ units per acre is intended to provide flexibility. If there is a range then we have to hit the range. However, if the Planning Commission wants to put some limits to the development then that could be added. Bussey asked what would happen if we do nothing. Trapp said that the property would remain guided neighborhood commercial and the zoning stays B2. Bussey asked what the process is for this particular developer. Trapp stated that, if it gets re - guided, then it's a matter of deciding what the appropriate zoning is for the project within the existing zoning districts. A rezoning of the property would require a review and public hearing by the Planning Commission. -1665- Planning Commission Minutes 6 May 1, 2018 Peterson asked what the 2040 plan is for this parcel. Trapp said it is medium density residential. Peterson thought it was nice to have the commercial option for that area. Smieja asked a question to audience; in your opinion, how would townhomes work for this parcel? Eight units per acre is about what a lot of the smaller lots in the area are. Jane Anderson, 5060 Edgewater Drive, liked the concept as presented. She can see a coffee shop, dentistry with nice owner occupied units. Peterson said that, if we are saying that, then the guidance would have to be mixed use. Smieja agreed but not necessarily multi -family. Ralph Kempf, 4363 Wilshire, thought that the city has to decide whether this lot will be vacant or developed. It needs to be appropriate to the neighborhood Arlyn Anderson, 3038 Brighton Commons, thought mixed use adds variety. Beau Myhre, 4501 Wilshire Boulevard, wants something nice next door. He's all for townhomes or mixed commercial. He would choose townhomes over rental. Public hearing closed 8:25 p.m. Question from audience: When are you discussing the downtown plan and the Schaefer Richardson plan? Smith replied that those items are not on tonight's agenda. Schaefer Richardson is taking back their proposal and nothing new has been submitted. The HRA & City Council requested proposals for the Harbor area. There have been no formal plans submitted. Smieja is in support of mixed-use with townhomes. Peterson hears from the audience that they want some type of commercial below with owner - occupied units above. Smieja said individual entrances seemed right for multi -use. Peterson wants owner occupied above — light commercial below. Bussey wants a soft transition from single-family rather than stark contrast of a multi -story building. -1666- Planning Commission Minutes 7 May 1, 2018 MOTION by Smieja, second by Peterson, recommending approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to add a Mixed Use land use category to support a variety of residential and public uses, knowing that each mixed use district will have its own character and approach to mixed use as described in Figure 4.4 in the 2030 Comp Plan. MOTION carried unanimously. B. Public Hearin ¢— Consideration of Amendment to the 2030 Mound Comprehensive Plan to Re -Guide Property at 4451 Wilshire Boulevard from Neighborhood Commercial to Mixed -Use Discussion Smieja wants to remove multi -family from unit types with 7-12 units per acre. Baker liked 7-12 units per acre. Peterson thought that removing multi -family would really narrow the options for developers. Baker asked for a definition of multi -family. Trapp said that it is more than 1 family in a structure. Peterson would like to keep it at townhomes. If multi -family site plans are provided to the city council are there ways to insure the look and feel is appropriate. Trapp said that it will have to be rezoned. You have the ability to influence the zone. Bussey asked if condition 2 in the report applies to more than these 2 parcels. Trapp restated that this only applies to these 2 PIDs. Baker asked if the medium density residential can be multi -family in the future. Trapp re -read the definition of Medium Density Residential. MOTION by Smieja, second by Bussey, recommending approval of 2030 Comprehensive Plan Amendment for properties identified as 19-117-23-31-0021 and 19-117-23-31-0020, with staff recommendations 1-4 and a modification for the Mixed -Use Area "Wilshire -Tuxedo Gateway' clarifying the Residential Unit Type being Townhomes and Residential Density of 7-12 units per acre. MOTION carried. Bussey, Goode, Saystrom, Smieja and Penner voting for; Peterson and Baker voting against. Baker thought that there could be condo/apartment that looks really nice and higher scale that fits into that spot. If we pull it and they wait a year it will be multi -family with commercial. C. Review / Recommendation — Short -Term Home Rental and Need for Regulations Smith introduced the item. Short-term rentals are relatively new. Two types generally exist: hosted rentals, where guests use part of the house with the host present and un -hosted rentals, where the owner vacates the house and renters stay there. Mound has no rental regulations of any kind. Current provisions allow a boarding house (several unrelated persons living in the same house with or without meals) or lodging rooms (persons with sleeping arrangements without cooking facilities), subject to conditions. Cities vary greatly. Recently, -1667- Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 cities have adopted regulations to allow or not allow short-term rentals. Some are regulating with permits or licenses. If we proceed to allow short-term rentals we will need regulations. The zoning ordinance will also need to be amended to specifically address short-term rentals. There are also licensing requirements at the state level that may apply to short-term rentals. For tonight's meeting, a public notice was published in the Laker and was also posted on the website. Staff also notified individuals that previously showed interest in the topic and sent letters to owners of properties previously identified as short-term rental sites in Mound. Staff provided background regarding short-term rental. The City Council directive to staff in 2017 was to move forward with an ordinance to allow both hosted and un -hosted, requiring license and inspections. Then at the City Council/Planning Commission meeting in March of 2018 they wanted to take another look at rentals to re-evaluate the direction the city was heading. In the fall of 2017 there were 20+/- rental units in Mound as identified on the various rental websites. Issues involving noise, parking, late night behaviors have occurred, though those have been limited to a handful of rentals. The issues for discussion by the Planning Commission include what is reasonable use of private property; should short-term rentals, if allowed, include hosted and un -hosted; what are reasonable regulations for both; should they not be allowed at all; if not allowed what would be the regulations specific to grandfathering. Kathy Rice, 2044 Arbor Lane, stated that they have a short-term/long-term rental next door. The owner lives in Victoria and bought the property for their summertime cabin. It is rented from early December on for anywhere from 1-8 weeks. They never know who's next door. They've had many complaints including loud music late at night, parties on deck late, children on their dock, and 3 large dogs with no respect for the leash law. Rice has called Orono PD for loud music. The rental house was broken into and renter's cars have used the Rice's driveway all night. Rice isn't always against short-term rental. It needs to be strictly enforced and rules clearly defined. Minnesota tax law dictates that the rental fee is income and taxable. Skip LaJoy, 4853 Plymouth Rd, feels that residentially -zoned areas are not designed to be revenue generating. Neighbors work hard on their "sanctuary'. Lots are smaller, houses are closer together, and sound carries. Hosted or non -hosted, in a commercial district would be better. Also, parking becomes a problem. Rebecca Karnes -Toth, 2116 Noble La, asked why short-term rental should be regulated when long-term rental isn't. Toth thinks that they ought to be addressed together. They are hosts in Mound and use short-term rental when they travel. Roger Stephenson, 4601 Island View Dr, feels the zoning ordinance does not allow short-term rental. Sect 129.99 allowable uses do not include short-term rental. Short-term does not work. Neighbor next door to a single-family residence allowed 8 occupants; first bad, second terrible. There was noise, they blocked street and driveway, and there were way too many vehicles and water craft. Twice renter asked for information that the host should have provided. There was yelling from house to the dock, a barking dog, and inappropriate language. They did not feel safe on their deck. Short-termers do not have the same investment or the incentive to act in a manner that a permanent resident must to be a good neighbor. This is something in the ..: Planning Commission Minutes May 1, 2018 neighborhood that doesn't fit. There are also safety problems, including the potential for inappropriate behavior with children in the neighborhood. These are strangers in our neighborhoods. He expressed concern about aggressiveness, anger, safety and predators. Why should neighbors have to deal with these behaviors from short-term renters? Add definition of short-term rental to 129-2 definitions and then short-term activity should be permitted or conditional in the same districts that motels are allowed and not allowed in residential districts. Heidi Theis, 2996 Bluffs Dr, disagrees with the negative feedback. They are prolific users of short-term rentals. There is nothing wrong with regulations if they are reasonable. Banning short-term rentals is the equivalent to banning dogs because some bark and behave inappropriately. Mound has the potential to be a destination and summer tourist area except that there is no hotel. Short-term rental can be a good short-term solution to making a mortgage payment. The rating of renters affects their ability to rent again (Airbnb). It's a good idea to have some regulation but don't ban it. The city should regulate long-term rentals as well. Connie Szarke, 1956 Shorewood, has had poor experiences with short-term renters next door. Szarke recommends Lance Bondhus as a resource as the city moves forward. Jeff Mills, 2008 Clover Cir, said that his wedding brought in family from all over the country and the world. It was a wonderful experience. We wanted them to experience life in Mound. There should be some regulation but Mills thinks banning is a crazy idea. Kelli Gillispie, 4400 Tuxedo Blvd, reminded all that Mound has no hotel because we are not on a major highway, and we need to work with what we have. It's a way to keep a family cabin. Gillispie suggested 3 strikes in a year (long and short term) and you lose your rental license. Yes, there will be good and bad. We need to meet together. Joe Grunnet, 1952 Shorewood La, is a host. He can empathize if there are real issues. We need to keep level headed common sense as there are always 2 sides. It's not right to pigeon hole short-term rentals. He's all for permitting, regulations, checks, and balances. Last year, his short-term rentals were 90% families. Grunnet stated that we need to keep a healthy dialogue and be sensitive to 10 pm noise limits, parking, etc. Tourists support the local businesses. There has to be a middle ground. Jane Anderson, 5060 Edgewater Drive, lives next door to a short-term rental. Anderson related the on-line description of the rental next door as well as the comments from the renters. It's like living next to a resort. The lot is 40 feet wide. There are too many boats, uncontrolled garbage, and too much noise. She also mentioned remodeling activities that took place that were not permitted. Merl Woytcke, 1701 Bluebird La, can see both sides and suggested that there's got to be some bite to the regulations. -1669- Planning Commission Minutes 10 May 1, 2018 Arlyn Anderson, 3038 Brighton Commons, said that hosting a short-term rental has allowed them to keep their family cottage. It helps her pay the taxes and upkeep. Anderson communicates expectations to the renters and advises the neighbors of the renter and their background. It has been a good experience. Cassie Hubler, 5824 Grandview Blvd, has a degree in tourism, planning, and hospitality. Hubler stated that this is not a new concept and is the wave of the future. She thought that the onus should be on the owners to be sure they are providing the right information to their guests. They should be seen as hospitality and distinguished from long-term rights. There should be more regulations. Lance Bondhus, 3826 Nicollet Ave, Mpls, has been a host at a duplex for 6 years. He conducted a small survey for 4 days and came up with 84 signatures, mostly from Mound. He has had no problems; no noise or anything. The renters are families coming and enjoying the great city of Mound. We don't allow bachelor parties or weddings. Neighbors have weddings and sit around the fire talking a little louder than we'd like. These are bad behaviors from neighbors and they deal with it. This is no more commercial than long-term rental. Bondhus is for regulation. The 3 strike rule makes sense. According to city data there are 1200 rental units in Mound. Smith asked if he talks to the state about regulations when taking on a new property. Bondhus indicated that he contacts every city individually. Kevin Mach, 2115 Pillsbury So, Mpls, purchased a house in Mound to rent out. Short-term is a good way for renters to get a local feel for an area. He personally uses short-term rentals when traveling. There are no hotels or accommodations for travelers. His Minneapolis home has a carriage house that has been rented for 2 years. It builds relationships. Bad apples do appear; rating, feedback, and review systems work. Regulations are necessary to protect you. He is in support of regulation. Scott Owens, 5869 Idlewood Rd, rents long and short-term. They have 30 properties and have rented to thousands of people. He has had very few bad experiences in 7 years. He suggests that, if a report is made to the police department, there is a requirement that someone must show up in person. As a host, you want to make sure something isn't happening to your property. Number one concern of vacation renters is that they don't want their vacation ruined so he has a policy that if there is an issue then the short-term rental is immediately finished. He would be open to having the police help evict short-term renters if there are problems. All renters sign a lease regardless of the type of rental (long or short). Being able to help people is one of the best things. Mound has a lot of older stock. Short-term renters buy local. Most are home owners elsewhere. Short-term rental units have to be maintained better because they get reviews. Owen's experience is that regulation needs to be on neighbor to neighbor behavior. There needs to be a "bite'. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water. -1670- Planning Commission Minutes 11 May 1, 2018 Doug Dahm, 5108 Edgewater Dr, is against short-term rentals. It has not been fun and games on Edgewater Drive. Every night is a party because they are on vacation. Dahm has 5 high end long-term rentals in Mound. He welcomes regulations for rental properties. Meryl Woytcke, 1701 Bluebird La, suggests that a time limit might work. Try 3-5 homes for a year and see how it works. Woytcke wants the city to put some good thought into it with bite. Heidi Theis, 2996 Bluffs Dr, asked if there was a noise ordinance. Peterson responded that there is. Theis asked if there was a fine. Peterson indicated that there was no fine. Theis thought regulations should start there. Peterson thought that short-term rentals are hard on community. Surrounding towns have banned it and felt that Mound cannot allow it unless we put some strong regulations as Mound may become a focal point for short-term rentals since owners cannot do it in other communities. Goode asked wanted to know who is responsible for putting together the regulations. Smith stated that staff would prepare draft regulations that would go to the City Council. Staff would also be responsible for addressing the grandfathering of current operations. Peterson thought that current rentals should be grandfathered in for the current season only. Smith questioned City Attorney Biggerstaff about the rights of current operators. Biggerstaff stated that staff is looking for a recommendation to allow with regulations or prohibit short-term rentals. Depending on the decision there are a whole host of other questions to answer. It is a common misconception that if we choose to prohibit an activity there is a big administrative savings. There is still a huge administrative piece that goes on to regulate the prohibition. There are no court decisions or interpretations at this time. Penner asked if there could be a limit to the number of rentals. Biggerstaff stated that it is common (i.e., liquor licenses). MOTION by Baker, second by Smieja, to extend the meeting for one half hour to 11:30 p.m. MOTION carried unanimously. Saystrom asked if one could assume there would be the same level of administrative time either way i.e., revenue neutral. Is it possible we could be revenue neutral with regulation and licensing? Are there other communities that have demonstrated this? Biggerstaff said he thought it was possible but would defer to city staff. By definition the fees should cover the cost of the staff time for processing and addressing the activity. Complexity of regulations would have something to say about that. -1671 - Planning Commission Minutes 12 May 1, 2018 Smieja is concerned about enforcement. Can the police force actually do anything? Smith noted that the draft ordinance that we were looking at included a section on conflicts/violations; i.e., 3 strikes or 2 strikes. If the ordinance is adopted there is going to need to be that ability. The license can be taken away similar to a liquor license. Smieja was concerned with immediate enforcement. If we don't know that immediate enforcement is possible it's hard to permit with regulations without knowing. Biggerstaff is not familiar with the noise ordinance; existing ordinances - can they be applied to this ordinance? Immediate eviction comes down to the agreement between the legal owner of the property (owner) and the equitable owner (tenant) at the time. The city wouldn't necessarily be in a place to demand eviction. A lot of the ordinances are based on the 2 or 3 strike provision. Presumption is that a continued bad actor would lose their license. It's a lot easier to deal with someone whose been given the right to do an activity, failed, lost that right, and then continues to do the bad behavior. It establishes a history of bad behavior. There are useful tools that come with regulating. Bussey asked if MN eviction process would apply to short-term rentals. Biggerstaff suspects it's probably an ineffective tool, but he has no experience with it. Baker thought that short-term rentals should be allowed with regulation. Baker doesn't see any difference between short-term and long-term rental. They should both be regulated. Saystrom thought that, if regulation cannot be enforced, it should be hosted rental only. This program needs to benefit the residents of Mound. A 2 -strike rule would sway him, but it has to be enforceable. The city should over -regulate at first. Smieja thought that it should be regulated not banned. There should be minimal strikes with enforceable regulations; also limit the number of rentals. Bussey thought it was the Commission's role is to listen and make recommendations that are in the best interest of the community. Single-family residents are generally long term. Bussey could be convinced with strong and strict regulations. Goode would allow with regulations. His biggest concern is enforcement. He thinks it won't be high on the radar for law enforcement. Penner is in favor with strict regulations, a cap on number of units, and limited capacity. It should be on a test basis first. Peterson thinks that every property that goes on the market will be purchased by an investor for a short-term rental. The good ones are using sites that are well run and the bad ones aren't. They are owners that don't care about the neighbors; only about return on investment. -1672- Planning Commission Minutes 13 May 1, 2018 Smieja acknowledged that there are a lot of problems to solve. How do we turn problems into opportunities is the key. We can take a stab at it. Saystrom wanted to know what the next steps were. Smith indicated that the recommendation from the Planning Commission will go to the City Council for formal review and that the proposed new ordinance following City Council action to allow or restrict short-term rentals will come back to the Planning Commission because an amendment to the zoning ordinance will be required. Smith also commented that enforcement and limiting the number of licenses could be included as part of the City's future discussion of short-term home rental regulations and ordinance if authorized. MOTION by Baker, second by Smieja to recommend the City Council allow short-term home rentals with regulations. MOTION carried. Penner, Baker, Goode, Smieja voted for; Peterson, Bussey, Saystrom voted against Saystrom thought that the water should be tested with hosted rentals. Bussey stated hosted rentals would have a better experience. Old/New Business A. Special meeting October 16, 2018 for 2040 Comprehensive Plan Staff is going to try to make it work within the regular schedule. B. Staff Update Smith anticipates that the short-term rental will likely be included on the 2nd Council meeting in May. ADJOURNMENT MOTION by Penner, second by Bussey, to adjourn at 11:22 pm. MOTION carried unanimously. Submitted by Jill Norlander -1673-