The URL can be used to link to this page

80-07-08CM 80-228 CM 80-229 CM 80-230 CM 80-233 CM 80-231 CM 80-232 CM 80-234 MOUND CITY COUNCIL July 8, 1980 City Hall 7:30 P.M. CITY OF MOUND .~ ., -~ Mound, Minnesota -~'~j .... REV I SED .,~///~ ~ '~x_? AG EN DA 1. Minutes Pg. 1610-1612 2. Public Hearings A. Townhouses - Fern & Church Pg. 1604-1609 B. Zoning Ordinance Pg. 1600-1603 3. Planning Commission Recommendations Pg. 1592-1599 A. Street Vacation - Brunswick from Essex Lane West 365 Feet Pg. 1590-1591 B. Side Yard Variance - Lot 4, Block 2, Mound Terrace Pg. 1587-1589 C. Front Yard & Side Yard Variance - Possible Appeal Pg. 1583-1586 D. Special Use Permit - Lots 5-11, 14-19, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A Pg. 1582 E. Subdivision of Land - Lots 11-14 & 19-22, Block 11, Wychwood Pg. 1580-158 F. Sign Variance - Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A Pg. 1578-1579 G. Temporary Sign Permit for Our Lady of the Lake Church Pg. 1577 H. Street Vacation - Dorchester from Essex Lane to the West edge of Lot 5, Block 10, Wychwood Pg. 1575-1576 I. 1. Subdivision of Land - Lots 10-13, Block 9, Seton Pg. 1574 2. Street Vacation - Devon Road from Carrick to Longfbrd Pg. 1570-1573 O. Lake Front~& Side Yard Variances - Lot 6, Block 2, Mound Terrace Pg. 1567 K. Sign Variance - Religious Crusade Pg. 1566 1569 t. Sports Arena 4. Street Construction 5. HUD Funds Pg. 1622-1624 6. Comments and Suggestions by .Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) 7. Delinquent Utility Bills Pg. 1564-1565 8. Tax Forfeit. Lands Pg. 1621 9. Police Pg. 1620 10. Payment of Bills 11. Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 1546-1563 & 1614-1619 12. Committee Reports Pg. 1613 WILLIAMS/O'BRIEN ASSOCIATES, INC. 45 S. 9th ST. MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55402 338-8981 ARCHITECTS/PLANNERS 7 July 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp Mound Village Manager 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Leonard: I have checked with the Sander Company' r~garding a roof bond and _.-it is not available. They will write an extended guarantee, for an additional two years, which gives the city a five year guaran- tee; but a 15 of 20 year bond isn't available. The practice of bonding roofs is almost non-existant today. Johns-Manville still does so on their roof, but bonding companies no longer do so. This is consistent with our recent experience. We have designed buildings for the Minneapolis School District, University of Minnesota, Skate Community College System and Corps of Engineers as well as private clients and none have roof bonds as_they traditionally were written a few years ago. The major problem was getting the bonding company to become'in- volved. It usually had to be established that the roof leaked before~they.would even look at it. In other words, if a skylight may have been the problem, it would have to be absolutely ruled out before'%he bonding company would investigate the roof as a source of the trouble. The bonds in most cases weren't worth the ~ paper they were printed on. The practice today at the University of Minnesota, for example, is to obtain a 3 year wara~tee from theinstaller, against any leakage other than tha~ caused by damage to the system. In this case the additional two year gugrantee would cost $500.00 per year. We hope the council°will find this satisfactory and authorized work to proceed. I will be out of town for a few days. Please contact Bruce Hassig of our office as he is in touch with the roofer and can tell him to proceed if you so decide. The Sander Company will have a purchase order with the City and we will reimburse the city for 50 percent. Si~rely,, zn~ ' /~S W.V0'Brien~ ~IA 'ice President WO/lme MINNEAPOLIE OFFICE PHONE 559-3141 ST. CLOUD OFFICE PHONE 2~1-7370 H ARDRIVE , INC. HARBOR LANE P,O ~OX 57l MINNEAFOLIS, MINN. 55441 ST. CLOUD, MINN. 56301 June 30, 1980 Mr. Lyle Swanson McCombs-Knutson Assoc., Inc. 12800 Olson Memorial Hwy. Minneapolis, Mn. 55441 RE: 1979 Street Improvement Project Dear Lyle: As you know, we have just received the easements on Lakewood Lane and recently on Driftwood. We will proceed with the work immediately. However, we will require a time extension of approximately fourty five (45) days to complete all of the new construction and final clean-up. The final clean-up work on all other areas of the project seems to be progressing satisfactorily and our goal is to be 100% complete by July 12th. We've had some probelms with weather this spring; but the majority of. the work has been completed despite it. The only area that is not close to being finished at this time is the beach park, because we were ask'd to hold off starting the work until about three weeks ago. I feel that this is a realistic schedule and believe that we, and our sub-contractors can meet it. Please consider the above and advise. Sincerely, Donald L. Rinowski Division Manager HARDRIVES, INC. DLR/cam 7-8-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota July 7, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-233 SUBJECT: HUD Funds Attached is a copy of a memorandum from the Planner discussing un- expended HUD Funds. This will be listed on the July 8th agenda for discussion. CITY OF BOUND Bound, Minnesota June 23, 1980 TO: FROM: RE: City Manager City Planner City Council Review of CDBG Program Adjustments CDBG Budget Items Needing Adjustment As discussed at the May 13 City Council meeting, a number of year 3 and 4 HUD Block Grant budget items are in need of amending. Our problem is with the successful implementation of a few allo- cated budget items. 1. PARKS Based on our recent park project bids, $17,000 is still remaining. The parks commission (see attachment) is requesting approximately '$7,000 be spent on tots and picnic tables. Therefore, a residual of $10,0OO is still remaining. Remaining Funds $ 10,OOO DUTCH ELM As discussed with the City Council, this pro- gram has received little if any support and constitutes an excessive administrative effort to implement. 5,000 3. CITY HALL HANDICAPPED ACCESS After years of dealing with the state law on wheelchair lifts, it now appears this program is infeasible. 21,500 INDIAN KNOLL MANOR GARDEN $500 of the original $2,000 was spent, $1,5OO remains. 1,5OO 5. HANDICAPPED ACCESS AT ISLAND PARK AND MOUND BAY PARK For both the architect estimates $16,500! 4,000 6. HOUSING SITE ACQUISITION 22,000 TOTAL $ 62,000 Page 2 II. Alternative BudBets to Spend ~/~1,000 ~sidual ~DBG Funds A couple alternatives to spending unallocated funds are recommended and are in need of City Council determination: A. CITY HALL ELEVATOR - Estimated at $90,000, $93,000 total. If the unallo~ated $62,000 is combined with other improve- ment equipment outlay funds and 1979 revenue sharing (from discussions totalling approximately $20,000) approximately an $82,000 elevator budget is possible. If alternative funds equalling another $20,000 are available, i.e. the bikeway project, etc., the project is feasible. B. RETAIN $10,000 PARKS FUND AND REALLOCATE REMAINING $52,000 TOWARDS HOUSING REHABILITATION. The housing rehabilitation fund could be spent this year and would clear our CDBG books. While the special assessment deferment project is a good one, spending the. funds, wou]d..not be till next year and creates a problem with the HUD wanting to spend the money this summer. Whatever project we go with, the funds need to be spent this summer regardless. I am plan- ning on the July 8 City Council meeting as the meeting to re- solve this issue. Chuck RieSenberg 7-8-80 CITY OF HOUND Hound, Hinnesota July 2, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-232 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Lands Attached is the classification list of tax forfeit land. The County is asking that the City certify this list. With regard to the lots listed: Plat Parcel Subdivision Block Lots Zoned 37719 2620 Wychwood 13 11-22 A-1 37950 0385 Seton 4 10 & 11 A-1 38010 4880 Wychwood 24 8 B 61580 2780 ~~ 6 1,2,P/3 B 61730 O155 A.Lincoln 2 6 & 30 B Addn., Lakeside Park Recommend Take for Wetland Take for Wetland Undersize-Hold off sale Take for Wetland & Lake Access 50'x 240 = 1',~2~O~ Put it up fOr sale It is recommended that a resolution be passed on each of the first four properties requesting they be taken by the City. 7-8-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota July 7, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-234 SUBJECT: Police The present Police Clerk is resigning and should be replaced. In view of recent happenings, we felt this should be discussed with the Council prior to hiring a new clerk. The position is needed even without Minnetrista and St. Bonifacius. The other item that should be decided on is new quarters. The school is still available. This will be on the July 8th agenda. NOTICE OF CHANGED MEETING TIME FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATE CONTROL PLAN FOR THE TWIN CITIES SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Board will consider adopting the total suspended particu- late control plan for the Twin Cities seven county metropolitan area at its meeting on Wednesday, July 23, 1980, which begins at 10:00 a.m. at 1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113. (A previous notice incorrectly indicated the meeting woUld begin at 2:00 a.m.) Those who have questions regarding the control plan or the specific time it will be considered should contact Susan Wierman, Air Quality Division, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, at the above address (Telephone: 612/296-7358). Dated this 30th day of June 1980. STATE OF MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Terry Hof~. an Executive ~irector ICE/CRIHE ACTIVITY REPORI CITY ALL CITIES CO~IBIt~ED IiONTH May YEAR 1980 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY 'SUMMARY THIS . THIS YEAR LAST YEAR /~CTI V ITY HONTH TO DATE TO DATE 'Hazardous Citations 130 2350 1986 Haza rd cus Warnings 15 15 .... Non-hazardous Citations 171 171 .... ..Non-hazardous Warnings 74 74 .parking Citations. . 214 J 214 .... DWI I0 41' '29' ~ Over .10 BAC 8 8 .... Property Damage Accidents 20 86 140 Personal Injury Accidents 9 33 21 Fatal Accidents ' '' " 0 0 2 Adult Felony Arrests 8 99 61 ~' Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 26 26 ~ Juvenile. Felony Arrests - - 24 63 ' 80 -- Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 12 12 o Part I Offenses 53 444 - 320' o Part II Offenses 59 59 Meal ical s 29 128 87 An imal Complaints 104 534 615 Other General Investigations 1186 5340 4129 TOTAL 2,152 9,697 7,470 O combined with sylr;bol of same type up thru April 1980 l t? II. ~.~O~ERTY OVERY SUMMARY ALL CITIES COMBINED - May 1980 lites ~ts ITEM g ;urrency. notes, etc. 'ewelry & precioug metals Guns Furnishings & Electronic. equipment .. rel~icle's & vehicle equipment Miscellaneous TOTAL · STOLEN 530 13,479 'i,125 7,375 2,800 300 5,205 1,520 6,020 $ 38,356. RECOVERED 316 12,ooo 2o $ 12,376 Ill. OFFENSE ACTI'~L'I~' SUMMARY ALL "~ '~S COMBII'IED- May 1980 /,/ / PART I CRIMES 0 ~ ~ Felonies .... Misdemeano A~ul~ Juv. Adul~ Juv Homicide ,~e .............. Robbery .... 1 ,, , 1 ...... A s s aatt ......... I ........ B~rg~a ry ..... 10 2 .... 8 8 2] ........ ,La rce~y , 43 43 5 2 ~eh~cle Thef~ ,~ ........ ' .... l, ' , . , 1 I .... .... '~' Arson :PART II CRIMES Forgery & Coanterfeit,ln, g .l. . 1 .... Fraud ¢ -, ..... StOlen Property ......... Vandalism .... 20 R0 1 ~? 5 Weapoqs .... Prostitutign ~ CommercialiZed vice "' Sex Offenses ,. ~a~Foti~ a~ugla?s . , " ' , ........ _ , ~ambli~ ...... ~r~ving under the influence 10' 10. · , ..... IQ .,, ~i.~ Laws 2 2 1 ~ublic IOea c e 6 6 TOTAL ~9 0 59 6 0 0 26 12 TOTAL PART I & PART II CRIM]~S ll4 2 112 11 MMARY PART I CRIMES Homicide Rape Robbery A s s ault Burglary Larceny ..... Yehicle Theft Arson TOTAL 4 28 3 -- Felonies M i sdemeano~ 34 3 PART II CRIMES S.i.mp1 e Assault _Forgery & Counterfeiting Fraud ¢: Embezzlement/ Stolen Property Vandalism Weapons Prostitution & Commercialized Vice Sex Offenses Narcotic drug laws Gambling Offenses against family, & children Driving under the influence .Liquor Laws Public Peace All other Offenses TOTAL 4 40 TOTAL 1-~ART I & t~ART II CRIMt~S 74 8 5 /6/,y 74 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL .... ~i. ~ i. i~ July l, 1980 .,.Pursuant ~to,due call and~notice thereof, a, regular meeting of the City Council, ~of the City~of Mound, Hennepin County,.,Minnesot:a was held at. 5341Maywood Road., ' in said City on July 1, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. ' Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson, Benjamin Withhart, Robert Polston and Donald Ulrick. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, Assistant City Engineer John Cameron and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of June 17, 1980 were presented for consideration. Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of June 17, 1980 as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. AL & ALMA'S DOCK Lovaasen moved and Polston seconded a motion to declare the existing dock construct- ed by A1 & Alma's not in conformance and request the attorney to pursue the correct- ion of the issue. The vote was three in favor with Swenson and Ulrick voting nay. Liquor License'Renewal - Surfside Swenson moved and Withhart seconded a motion · RESOLUTION 80-243 RESOLUTI'ON'AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF THE 'LIQUOR- LICENSE FOR SURFSIDE The vote was unanimously in favor. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES Eagle Lane on Harrison's Bay Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARKCOMMISSION THAT ACCESS BE RESTRICTED TO BY FOOT ONLY - NO BOAT LAUNCHING Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion to table this item. The vote was three in favor with Withhart and Polston voting nay. The Mayor requested this item be referred back to the Park Commission for further consideration. Stairway on Commons - 4601 Island View Drive Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-244 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECO~,~MENDATION OF THE PARK COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PERMIT FOR A STAIRWAY ON COMMONS The vote was unanimously in favor. July 1, 1980 75 Ho Parking on Service Road Request Withhart moved and Swenson seconded a motion to request the attorney t.o draft an o.rdinance providing for noparking off of .the:'service road,. ,,The vote was unanimously in favor. : FISHING CONTEST ' ~¢' ........ ' ..... Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-245 RESOLUTION APPROVING A FISHING CONTEST SPONSORED BY LUCKY 7 BASSHASTERS TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 24, 1980 INSTEAD OF AUGUST 10, 1980 The vote was unanimously in favor. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS - MOUND-SPRING PARK ~.IATER CONNECTION Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-246 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MOUND-SPRING PARK WATER CONNECTION AND AUTHORIZING'ADVERTISING FOR BIDS The vote was unanimously in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT No comments or suggestions were presented at this time. STREET CONSTRUCTION Lovaasen moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLTUiON 80-247 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CHANGE ORDER TO INCLUDE 120 FEET OF STORM SEWER EXTENSION ON MAPLE ROAD FROM RAMBLER TO THE.WEST-ESTIMATED COST-$2,200.00 The vote wasl unanimously in favor. Polston moved a~d Withhart seconded a motion RESOLUTION '80-248 " RESOLUTION APPROVING A CHANGE ORDER TO NARROW DUTCH LANE FROM BIRCH TO LINDEN FROM 24 FEET TO 22 FEET-A REDUC'ED COST OF $620.00 The vote was unanimously in favor. cITY HALL ROOF Polston moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion to authorize repair of the City Hall roof with the City splitting the cost on a 50/50 basis with Williams-O'Brien Inc. with inclusion of a fifteen year bond. The vote was unaninmously in favor. PHILLIPS BOOKKEEPING MACHINE ~lithhart moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion to sell the Phillips Book- keeping machine to the original vendor for $1,500.00. The vote was unanimously in favor. 76 July 1, 1980 TRANSFERS Swenson moved and-¥$ithhart seconded a motion ~. ~:~.. ...... -~iRESOLUTION 80-249 RESOLUT'IONiAUTHORiZING THE TRANSFER OF CERTAINi'.~ .... -~ '!!'ii.~ ~ CITY FUNDS . ~ The vote was unanimously in favor. ~ ...... ~:~ '-:~ PAYMENT OF BILLS Ulrick moved and Wi~thhart seconded a motion to approve the payment of the bills as submitted on the prelist in the amount of $38,814.80 when funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. Withhart moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-250 RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY ~,IANAGER TO WRITE A LETTER TO THE I.C.C SUPPORTING THE PROPOSAL FOR THE ABANDONED RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY MADE BY THE CITY OF EXCELSIOR AND THAT PARKING BE CONSIDERED A ~ VALID USE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY , The vote was unanimously in favor. OTHER MATTERS DISCUSSED Tax delinquent property for private sale; termination of police service with Minnetrista. Councilmember Swenson expressed concern that the City has not been responsive to contracting communities in the police contract. Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to cancel the regular Council meeting scheduled for Ju'ly"15th and combin~ the. agenda_with the'spe'cia'l"meeting on~J~l.y 16, 1980. The vote was u~animously in favor. ADJOURNMENT '' Withhart moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn to the next regular meeting on July 8, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor,~so adjourned. Mary H. Marske CMC, City Clerk/Treasurer Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager 7-8-8O CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota July 1, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-22~ SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Townhouses Fern & Church A public hearing has been called for July 8 to consider a town- house application on Fern and Church. Attached is a copy of the Environmental Assessment which has been confirmed by the Planning Commission. o.? NOTE: MINNESOTA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (RAW5 AND NOTICE OF FINDINGS DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE E.R. f/ The purpose of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) is to provide information on a project so that one can assess rapidly whether or not the project requires an Environmental Impact Statement. Attach additional pages, charts, maps, etc, as needed to answer these questions. Your answers should be as specific as possible. Indicate which answers are estimated. SUMMARY A. ACTIVITY FINDING BY RESPONSIBLE AGENCY (PERSON) I t Negative Declaration (No EIS) ~--~EIS Preparation Notice (EIS Required) B. ACTIVITY IDENTIFICATION 1. Project name or title Moundwood Townhomes 2. Project proposer(s) Dr. Carlson & Romness Address Mound, Minnesota Telephone Number and Area Code ( ) 612-472-1144 Responsible Agency or Person City of Mound Address 5341 Maywood Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 Person in Responsible Agency (Person) to contact for further information on this EAW: Lyle Swanson Telephone: 559-3700 This EAW and other supporting documentation are available for public inspection and/or copying at: Location: City of Mound Offices Telephone: 472-1155 Reason for EAW Preparation ~Mandatory Category - Cite MEQC Rule Number(s) (City of Mound Requirement) Hours: 8:00 A.M. to 4:30 P.M. ~-~ Petition ~w-~Other ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION SUMMARY 1. Project location County Hmnnepin Township No. 13 Section No(s) 24 description: 2. City/Township name Mound (North), Range No, 117 East or West (circle), Street address (if in city) or legal Type and scope of proposed project: Construction of 8 townhouse units. Be 4. 5. 6. Estimated starting date (Month/Year) October 1980 Estimated completion date (Month/Year) December 1980 Estimated construction cost $300,000 List any federal funding involved and known permits or approvals needed from each unit of government and status of each: NONE Unit of Government (federal, state, regional, local) Name or Type of Permit/Approval or Federal Funding Status If federal permits, funding or approvals are involved, will a federal EIS be prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act? NO YES UNKNOWN II. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION A. Include the following maps or drawings: 1. A map showing the regional location of the project. An original 8-1.2 x 11 section of a U.S.G.S. 7-1/2 minute, 1:24,000 scale map with the activity or project area boundaries and site layout delineated. Indicate quadrangle sheet name. (Original U.S.G.S. sheet must be maintained by Responsible Agency; legible copies may be supplied to other EAW distribution points.) - 2 - A sketch map of the site showing location of structures and including significant natural features (water bodies, roads, etc). Current photos of the site must be maintained by the Responsible Agency. Photos need not be sent to other distribution points. B. Present land use. Briefly describe the present use of the site and lands adjacent to the site. Site is wooded, adjacent area is developed residential. 2. Indicate the approximate acreages of the site that are: a. Urban developed acres f. Wetlands (Type III,IV,V) acres b. Urban vacant .72acres g. Shoreland acres c. Rural developed acres h. Floodplain acres d. Rural vacant acres i. Cropland/Pasture land acres e. Designated Re- acres j. Forested acres creation/Open Space List names and sizes of lakes, rivers and streams on or near the site, particularly lakes within 1.000 feet and rivers and streams within 300 feet. Lake Minnetonka -3- C. Activity Description Describe the proposed activity, including staging of development (if any), operational charactmristics, and major types of equipment and/or processes to be used. Include data that would indicate the magnitude of the proposed activity (e.g. rate of production, number of customers, tons of raw materials, etc). 1) Clearing & grading of site. 2) Construction of townhouse units. 3) Landscaping. Equipment involved is bulldozer, trucks, and normal home building equipment. 2. Fill in the following where applicable: mo Total project area.?2acres or Length miles g. Size of marina and acess 0 sq. ft. channel (water area) h. Vehicular traffic trips generated per day 63 ADT b. Number of housing or recreational units 8 i. Number of employees 0 c. Height of struc- 2j~ft. tures j. Water supply needed 2250 gal/da Source: Municipal supply d. Number of parking k. Solid waste requiring spaces 8 garages disposal Offstreet Parking for 16 cars. e. Amount of dredging 0 cu. yd. 17 ..5tons/yr Liquid wastes requiring treat- ment 1800gal/da 1. Commercial, retail or industrial floor space 0 sq. ft. III. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT A. SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY Will the project be built in an area with slopes currently exceeding 12%? x No Yes o Are there other geologically unstable involved in the project, such as fault zones, shrink- swell soils, peatlands, or sinkholes? x No Yes -4- If yes on 1 or 2, describe slope conditions or unstable area and any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impacts. N/A Indicate suitability of site soils for foundations, individual septic systems, and ditching, if these are included in the project. Soils are suitable for building foundations. o o Estimate the total amount of grading and filling which will be done: 600 cu. yd. grading. 600cu. yd. filling What percent of the site will be so altered? 30 % What will be the maximum finished slopes? 5 % What steps will be taken to minimize soil erosion during and after construction? Place haybales at points where drainage leaves site during construction. After construction sod or seed all disturbed areas. B 0 VEGETATION 1. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following vegetative types: Woodland 100% Brush or shrubs Grass or herbaceous Cropland/Pasture Marsh Other (Specify) % % % -5- o How many acres of forest or woodland will be cleared, if any? 0.21 acres. Are there any rare or endangered plant species or areas of unique botanical or biological significance on the site? (See DNR publication. The Uncommon Ones.) X NO YES If yes, list the species or area and indicate any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impact. C. FISH AND WILDLIFE Are there any designated federal, state or local wildlife or fish management areas or sancturaries near or adjacent to the site: x NO YES Are there any known rare or endangered species of fish and wildlife on or near the site: (See DNR publication. The Uncommon Ones.) X NO YES o Will the project alter or eliminate wildlife or fish habitat? X NO YES If yes on any of questions 1-3, list the area, species or habitat, and indicate any measures to be used to reduce potential adverse impact on them. -6- D. HYDROLOGY Will the project include any of the follo~ing~ If yes, describe type of work and mitigative measures to reduce adverse impacts. ao co Drainage or alteration of any lake, pond, marsh, lowland or groundwater supply Shore protection works, dams, or dikes Dredging or filling operations Channel modifications or diversions Appropriation of ground and/or surface water Other changes in the course, current or cross-section of water bodies on or near the site NO YES X X X X X x o What percent of the area will be converted to new impervious surface: 30 What measures will be taken to reduce the volume of surface water runoff and/or treat it to reduce pollutants (sediment, oil, gas, etc.)? Drainage from site is to City storm sewers which have sediment basins. Will there be encroachment into the regional (100 year) floodplain by new fill or structures? x NO YES If yes, does it conform to the local flood plain ordinance: NO YES What is the approximate minimum depth to groundwater on the site? 20 feet -7- WATER QUALITY Will there be a discharge of process or cooling water, sanitary sewage or other waste waters to any water body or to groundwater? x NO YES If yes, specify the volume, the concentration of pollutants and the water body receiving the effluent. o If discharge of waste water to the municipal treatment system is planned, identify any toxic, corrosive or unusual pollutants in the wastewater. NONE Will any sludges be generated by the proposed project? NO YES If yes, specify the expected volume, chemical composition and method of disposal. Normal domestic sewage only. What measures will be used to minimize the volumes or impacts identified in questions 1-37 None necessary. -8- If the project is or includes a landfill, attach information on soil profile, depth to water table, and proposed depth of disposal. N/A F. AIR QUALITY AND NOISE Will the activity cause the emission of any gas and/or particulates into the atmosphere? NO x YES If yes, specify the type and origin of these emissions, indicate any emission control devices or measures to be used, and specify the approximate amounts for each emission (at the source) both with and without the emission control measures or devices. During construction low levels of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons will be released. Following construction of the residential units low level emissions will continue. o Will noise or vibration be generated by construction and/or operation of the project: NO x YES If yes, describe the noise source(s); specify decibel levels dB(A) , and duration (hrs/da) for each and any mitigative measures to reduce the noise/vibration. Construction equipment - no mitigative measures are planned. If yes on 1 or 2, specify whether any areas sensitive to noise or reduced air quality-(hospitals, elderly housing, wilderness, wildlife areas, residential developments, etc.) are in the affected area and give distance from source. Residential development contiguous to site, but will suffer only minor inconvenience due to temporary nature of the noise source. -9- G. LAND RESOURCE CONSERVATION, ENERGY Is any of the site suitable for agricultural or forestry production or currently in such use? X NO YES If yes, specify the acreage involved, type and volume of marketable crop or wood produced and the quality of the land for such use. Are there any known mineral or peat deposits on the site: X NO YES If yes, specify the type of deposit and the acreage. Will the project result in an increased energy demand? NO X YES. Complete the following applicable: Energy requirements (oil, electricity, gas, coal, solar, etc.) Estimated Peak Demand Annual (Hourly or Daily) Anticipated Firm Contract or Type Requirement Summer Winter Supplier Interruptible Basis? Gas 3,306,000 cf 15~000 Minnegasco firm [ectric~ t¥ 12f300 k~h NSP firm -10- Estimate the capacity of all proposed on-site storage. None c. Estimate annual energy distribution for: space heating 52 % lighting 6 air conditioning 29 % processing '13 ventilation % * range, water heater, etc. Specify any major energy conservation systems and/or equipment incorporated into this project. None What secondary energy use effects may result from this project (e.g., more or longer car trips, induced housing or businesses, etc)? Some of the units may be purchased from the core City and there may be longer car trips as a result. H. OPEN SPACE/RECREATION Are there any designated federal, state, county or local recreation or open space areas near the site (including wild and scenic rivers, trails, lake accesses)? x NO YES. -11- If yes, list areas by name and explain how each may be affected by the project. Indicate any measures to be used to reduce adverse impacts. I. TRANSPORTATION Will the project effect any esisting or proposed trans- portation systems (highway, railroad, water, airport, etc.)? x NO YES If yes, specify which part(s) of the system(s) will be affected. For these, specify existing use and capacities, average traffic speed and percentage of truck traffic (if highway); and indicate how they will be affected by the project (e.g. congestion, percentage of truck traffic, safety, increased traffic (ADT), access requirements). o Is mass transit available to the site? NO x YES What measures, including transit and paratransit services, are planned to reduce adverse impacts? None planned. -12- J o PLANNING, LAND USE, COMMUNITY SERVICES 1. Is the project consistent with local and/or regional comprehensive plans? NO X YES If not, explain: If a zoning change or special use permit is necessary, indicate existing zoning and change requested. A conditional use permit will be required. o Will the type or height of the project conflict with the character of the existing neighborhood? x NO ___YES If yes, explain and describe any measures to be used to reduce conflicts. o How many employees will move into the area to be near the project? None HOW much new housing wil% be needed? N/A Will the project induce development nearby--either support services or similar developments? No If yes, explain type of development and specify any other counties and municipalities affected. -13- Public Service Water Wastewater treatment Sewer Schools Solid Waste disposal Streets Is there sufficient capacity in the following public services co handle the project and any associated growth? other (police, fire, etc) Amount required for project 3000 gal/da 2400 gal/da 0 feet 8 pupils 1.5 ton/mo 0 miles Sufficient capacity? yes yes yes yes yes yes yes If current major public facilities are not adequate do existing local plans call for expansion, or is expansion necessary strictly for this one project and its associated impacts? Is the project within a proposed or designated Critical Area or part of a Related Actions EIS or other environ- mentally sensitive plan or program reviewed by the EQC? x NO YES If yes, specify which area or plan. Will the project involve the use, transportation, storage, release or disposal of potentially hazardous or toxic liquids, solids on gaseous substances such as pesticides, radioactive wastes, poisions, etc.? No -14- If yes, please specify the substance and rate of usage and any measures to be taken to minimize adverse environmental impacts from accidents. When the project has served its useful life, will retirement of the facility require special measures or plans? X NO YES If yes, specify: K. HISTORIC RESOURCES Are there any structures on the site older than 50 years or on federal or state historical registers? x NO YES Have any arrowheads, pottery or other evidence of pre- historic or early settlement been found on the site? X NO YES Might any known archaeologic or paleontological sites be affected by the activity? x NO YES List any site or structure identified in 1 and 2 and explain any impact on them. None -15- OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS Describe any other major environmental effects which may not have been identified in the previous sections. None III. OTHER MITIGATIVE MEASURES Briefly describe mitigative measures proposed to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts that have not been described before. None Vo FINDINGS The project is a private ( X ) governmental ( ) action. .The responsible Agency (Person, after consider~on of the information in this EAW, and the factors in Minn. Reg. MEQC 25, makes the following findings. The project is ( State reasons: ) is not (X) a major action. o The project does ( ) does not ( x ) have the potential for significant environmental effects. State reasons: -16- (For private actions only.) The project is ( of more than local significance. State reasons: ) is not (X) IV. CONCLUSIONS AND CERTIFICATION NOTE: A Negative Declaration or EIS Preparation Notice is not officially filed until the date of publication of the notice in the EQC Monitor section of the Minnesota State Register. Submittal of the EAW to the EQC constitutes a request for publication of notice in the EQC Monitorf mo I, the undersigned, am either the authorized representative of the Responsible Agency or the Responsible Person identified below. Based on the above findings, the Responsible Agency (Person) makes the following conclusions. (Complete either 1 or 2). NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE No EIS is needed on this project, because the project is not a major action and/or does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and/or, for private actions only, the project is not of more than local significance. o EIS PREPARATION NOTICE An EIS will be prepared on this project because the project is a major action and has the potential for significant environmental effects. For private actions, the project is also of more than local significance. mo The MEQ Rules provide that physical construction or operation of the project must stop when an EIS is required. In special circumstances, the MEQC can specifically authorize limited construction to begin or continue. If you feel there are special circumstances in this project, specify the extent of the progress recommended and the reasons. -17- Date Draft EIS will be submitted: (month) (day) (year) (MEQC Rules require that the Draft EIS be submitted with- in 120 days of publication of the EIS Preparation Notice in the EQC Monitor. If special circumstances prevent compliance with this time limit, a written request for extension explaining the reasons for the request must be submitted to the EQC Chairman.) The Draft EIS will be prepared by (list Responsible Agency(s) or Person(s)): Bo Signature Title Date Attach an affidavit certifying the date that copies of this EAW were mailed to all points on the official EQC distribution list, to the city and county directly impacted, and to adjacent counties or municipalities likely to be directly impacted by the proposed action (refer to question III.J.4 on page 9 of the EAW). The affidavit need be attached only to the copy of the EAW which is sent to the EQC. C. Billing procedures for EQC Monitor Publication State agency ONLY: Attach to the EAW sent to the EQC a completed OSR 100 form (State Register General Order FOrm-- available at Central Stores). For instructions, please contact your Agency's Liaison Officer to the State Register or the Office of the State Register--(612) 296-8239. -18- SUNNYFIELD RD. II g. Ba~ ORONO Am 15 WOODEDGE ~D Langdon Lake Priest Bay HALSTEADS BAY Harrison MOUND 2800 Cooks Bay Phelps Bay ON ;PRING NAVARRE ~1111~SLAND i~[.McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 1~4nn CONSULTING ENGINEERS m LAND SURVEYORS B SITE rmNNEnS 1 Vl~ff ~VV~ I ~ff~UlYl~ MINNEAPOLIS a~ HUTCHINSON,MINNESOTAI SCALE K)OK II'AGE FILE NO, --¸% CITY OF MOUND 1,1ULTI PLE DWEi,L'[NG 75.00 ~5.00 Unit ZONING CO.~DI'.t'IONAL USE r~QUESTED 'T~O~kJ k~ ~O~J ~ Applicant's Znt:erest in Property OVuN~¢S State why thJ. s use, if granted, would not be contrary to the general pur?..'.use and intent of the ordinance to secure pub].ic health, safety, general welfare, and s~d>stanLial justice. / List Residents and C~..;ne×'s of all property within 350 feel: of the t)ropo~-;t'..d use:____ ~LL E~Fr ~-'--~~~ .... .':':; ........ (l~)'lla" ........' ........ Addi-eS~:'~ ~ ~Zo~ C ~~ ~L~O,I ~oV~ Tel. No. %q~--~qZ--X~3~ ]. I,:.,~ti.[.xG CO;,if-I!Sf;]ON RF;CO~q;'.U.J~t)A'I'JOF/: Conceptual ~prQy~] 'NeB ~ 2' --b Ra Conditional Use Permit recommended. DA??: June 9, 1980 COiJi',J('.']; I, ACT.[ O:,i R£::;O] U. LJ.cm 1'.]0. DATE NOTE: ])].C!ftf;(! ' ~ ' ° ' ' rsl}:J],l:l.t.w.i['}l '[:}~i.q ald.-;.Lical:ion all. ]nform,;tt:ion, data surveys, etc. LI ABt:' CATION FO~VARIANCE CITY OF MOUND $ 2 .00 Z0 NG. Address ~C~% ~_.~ff"~'d'C~-. (~LX~O, LOT i-['':~ ~4'C~--\\.BLOCK ..... q Number~'¥7--~|~ ADDITION (:[~'~'~ (:'~ S I '2L ]M~n'ff[ t . INTEREST IN PROPERTY (-~"=~b1 FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Telephone VAPJ_ANCEREQUESTED: YARD )O FT. SIDE YARD [ FTJ' REAR I FT.'[ YARD N. C. U."",' or OTHER (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: NOTE: 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing BUILDING FT. in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z. Give ownership and dimensions of LOT SiZE i~T] adjoining property.- Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application LOT SQ. by extending survey or drawing. FOOTAGE 3. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request, A:',.buxid~nz~ permit must be apphed for w~th~n one year from the date of the · , i % - council ~e'~olution or variance granted becomes null and void, ( ~ ~ i,4~ "-;V~r~ances: are not tra~fera~le. _ 'PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Lot size variance of 487 square feet granted and the street front variance be granted, DATE June 9, 1980 be COUNCIL AC TION: RESOLUTION NO DATE CITY OF HOUND Mound, Minnesota May 12, 1980 TO: FROM: RE: City Manager City Planner Initial Review of Site Plan for .the Romness-Carlson Property Based on the site plan submitted, and after meeting this afternoon with Doctors Carlson and Romness, initial review of the proposed townhouse project is generally in conformance with City Zoning Code outside the following items: Lot Area - For the nine units proposed 32,500 square feet of total lot area is indicated. According to the townhouse code for two bedroom units 4,000 square feet per unit is required or 36,000 square feet total. This is 3,500 square feet short. B. Low Area - Two of the lots have a low area which on- Site investigation will offer more information. / No reZoning is Called for because only' the multifamily zoned property is proposed for development. When the C.U.P. is submitted, it is recommended that the survey, on- site soils information, and other submittal items indicated be forth- coming. Make sure that at time of C.U.P. submittal a variance to lot area a~company. Chuck Riesenberg 7-8-8o CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota July l, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-229 SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Zoning Ordinance A public hearing has been called for July 8 to consider revisions in the Zoning Ordinance. Attached is a copy of a letter from the Planner suggesting some modifications to the ordinance as proposed. ..... L~onard L. Kopp F ' CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 30, 1980 TO: FROM: RE: City Manager City Planner Public Hearing On Proposed Zoning Submitted for City Council review are a couple ordinance modifi- cation ideas which were directed at me as a result of our May meeting on the ordinance: A. Relaxation of the sideyard regulations on small lots of record Discussion was centered on allowing two six by six sideyard setbacks on undersized lots if ad- equate parking is maintained through the construc- ti.on of i.e. tuck-under garages. Such a provi- sion would read: Page 34, Section 604.5(3). The following minimum setback requirements shall be observed for under- sized lots of record. Side Yard: Of the two required side yard setbacks, one side yard setback shall be a mininum of 10 feel; the other side yard s~tback shall be based on the lot width as follows: Lot Width Minimum Setback on One Side Yard 40-50 feet greater than 50 less than 60 greater than 60 less than 80 greater than 80 less than 100 greater than 100 6 feet 6 feet 6 feet 8 feet 10 feet Side Yard for structure with existing garage or struc- ture with tuck-under garage Lots with a principal structure and garage existing of a tuck-under garage shall be required to maintain two sideyard setbacks of six feet each. B. Additional Parking Standards ,,,. ...... : : ....... To-addto ourpresent list of parking standards, page 68, : .... ~.~ ~. . SectionT16;6, the following are recommended. Dance Halls. and assembly halls without fixed seats, exhibition halls except church assembly rooms in conjunction with aud- itorium Funeral Homes, mortuaries Furniture and appliance stores, household equipment or furni- ture repair shop over 1,000 sq. ft. floor are~ Libraries, museums or art gal- leries Convalescent homes, children's homes Sports arenas, auditoriums, theatres, assembly halls other than schools Wholesale establishments or warehouses Automobile or machinery sales and service garages 1 for each 100 sq.ft of floor area used for assem-: bly or dancing 4 for each parlor or 1 for each 50 sq.ft, of floor area 1 for each 400 sq.ft, of floor area 1 for each 500 sq. ft. of floor area 1 for each 6 beds 1 for each 6 seats 1 for each 3 employees on max- imum shift or for each 3,000 sq.ft, of floor area, whichever is greater 1 for each 800 sq.ft, floor area Co Page 15, Section 407(5) - the dimensions in the figure are switched. Page 16, Section 408(3) - need for clarification on this section. My interpretation of setback regulations for those attachments or parts of the house which protrude beyond the building foun- dation line: 1. Eaves and gutters, etc.: may extend 2 feet from the building line into the yard. 2.Steps and porches at ground level may extend to 2 feet of the lot line. 3. Decks and balconies at above ground level may extend 10 feet to the rear lot line and for side yard set- backs to 6 feet in the side yard and 4 feet in the rear yard. Chuck Ri esenberg J oi CITY OF MOUND Hound, Hinnesota 7-8-8o July 2, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-230 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendations Attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes. The following require Council action: Item 1. Street Vacation Brunswick,from Essex Lane West 365 feet The Planning Commission recommended vacation of the property. A Public hearing is required, August 5 is suggested. Side Yard Variance Lot 4, Block 2, Mound Terrace Zoned A-2 6,000 Square Feet The Planning Commission recommended a 2 foot lakefront variance and a 1.5 foot side yard variance. Possible Appeal Front Yard & Side Yard Variance Lot 7, Block 16, Shadywood Point Zoned Residential B 6,000 Square Feet Single Family The Planning Commission recommend denial of a 6 foot front yard variance and a 35 foot side yard variance Special Use Permit Lots 5-11, 14-19, Block'l, Shirley Hills Unit A Zoned Commercial The Planning Commission recommended a.special use permit be issued to allow boat repair and fiberglass work be done on this property. They suggested the following stipulations: 1. Limit outside storage parking of vehicles or boats to 10 to be inside fenced area. 2. NO outside sanding or fiberglassing. This requires a public hearing, August 5 is suggested. 5. Subdivision of Land Lots 11-14 and 19-22, Block 11, Wychwood The Planning Commission recommended the lots be divided into 80'x 80' parcels: Planning Comm[ssion ecommendations - Page 2 Item ~5. (Cont.) Parcel A - Lots 11 & 12 Parcel B - Lots 13 & 14 Parcel C - Lots 19 & 20 Parcel D - Lots 21 & 22 6. Sign Variance Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A Zoned Commercial The Planning Commission recommended a variance for a sign (see plan attached) to be put on the face of the building. 7. Tabled 8. No Variance Required - Tabled. The Planning Commission recommended a complete refund. 9. Temporary Sign Permit Our Lady of the Lake Church Our Lady of the Lake has requested a temporary sign for 3 weeks to be located on the Super Valu parking lot. The Planning Commission recommended the sign and waiving the fee. 10. Street Vacation Dorchester from Essex Lane to the West Edge of Lot 5, Block 10, Wychwood The Planning Commission recommended the vacation. A public hearing is required, August 5 is recommended. 11. A. Subdivision of Land Lots lO,II,12,& 13, Block 9, Seton Zoned A-2 6,000 Square Feet The Planning Commission recommended the division as requested providing the required street vacation is approved. It is recommended this be held over until after the street vacation hearing. B. Street Vacation Devon Road from Carrick Road to Longford The Planning Commission recommended the vacation. A public hearing is required, August 5 is suggested. 12. Lake Front & Side Yard Variance Lot 6, Block 2, Mound Terrace Zoned A-2 Planning Commission~ecommendations - Page 3 Item 12.(Cont.) The request is for a 5 foot chain link fence around the lot. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the request. The vote was 2 in favor of the denial to 1 against. 2 members abstained. 13. Sign Variance The Rev. R. McClelland appeared and requested that temporary signs be allowed on 3 locations to advertise the coming religious crusade. The Planning Commission recommended the variance and recommended waiving the fee. 14. Sports Arena The Planning Commission recommended that setbacks of building be at least 30 feet from lot line on North and East and 10 feet from lot line on South. ?7 MINUTES OF THE MOUND ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING dune 30, 1980 Pnesent: .Chairman,Russell Peterson; Commissioners George Stannard,'Steve ........ .... Donnsbach and Gary Paulsen; Council; Representative Robert-'Polston; City ..... ~' ......... Manager Leonard L. Kopp; City Inspector Henry Truelsen and Secretary Marge Stutsman. MINUTES The minutes of the June 9, 1980 Planning Commission meeting were presented for consideration. Polston moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to approve the minutes of June 9th as presented. The vote was unanimously in favor. BOARD OF APPEALS 1. Street Vacation - Brunswick from Essex Lane West No one present at this time. Stannard moved and Polston seconded a motion to place at end of agenda. All in favor. 4 S~de Yard and Lake Front Variances . Lot 4, Block 2, Mound Terrace Fred Haynie was present. Polston moved and Stannard seconded a motion to grant variances re- quested recognizing the non-conforming use and with the stipulation that if deck area screened, they do put in permanent footings. The vote was unanimously in favor. Front and Side Yard Variances for Garage Lot 7, Block 16, Shadywood Point Allen Schmidt was present. Polston moved and Paulsen seconded a motion that variances be granted. The vote was Polston and Pauisen Aye; Stannard, Peterson and Dornsbach Nay. Motion denied by a 3 to 2 vote. Reasons: Can't justify creating non-conforming use for this purpose. Special Use Permit (In S.W. corner of new building) Lots 5-11 & 14-19, Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit a Oswin Pflug was present. Polston moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to recommend that a Special Use Permit for fiberglass and boat repair be granted with two stipulations: A. Limit outside storage parking of vehicles or boats to 10 and that they be inside fenced area. B. No outside sanding or fiberglassing will be done. Subdivision of Land Lots 11-14 and 19-22, Block ll, Wychwood Harvey Reder was present. Paulsen moved and Polston seconded a motion to grant redivision of lots as requested (80'X 80'). The vote was unanimously in favor. Planning Commission Minutes June 30, 1980 - Page 2 BOARD OF APPEALS (Continued) '6. Sign Variance - 4839 Shoreline Boulevard ~ ~'~ , Block 1, Shirley Hills Unit A Dale Anderson was present. Stannard moved and Dornsbach seconded a motion to approve sign permit- sign to be lighted from dusk to midnight and be on the face of building. The vote was unanimously in favor. Side Yard Variance Lot 10 and Part of Lot 11, Block 2, The Highlands No one present at this time. Stannard moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to move this item to end of agenda. The vot.e was unanimously in favor. No variance required. Lots 15 & 16, Block 11, Wychwood Harvey Reder was present. .... : Paulsen moved and Polston seconded a motion tk~at.fee for variance be refunded as it was determined that no variance was required. The vote was unanimously in favor. 9. Temporary Sign Permit in Super Valu Lot for Our Lady of the Lake Jerry Longpre was present. Polstpn moved and Dornsbach seconded a motion to grant sign permit with provision that sign be parked in such a manner so as not to impair traffic vision and to'recommend that fee be waived. The vote wa~unanimously in favor. 10. Street Vacation of Dorchester from West edge of Lot 5, Block 10, Wych- wood to Essex Lane Steinmetz, Schnabel and O'Hair were present. Polston moved and Dornsbach seconded a motion to recommend street vacation as requested ~providing the City Engineer does not need for drainage right-of-way. The vote was unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land and Street Vacation . Lots !0, 11, 12 & 13, Block 9, Seton and Vacation of adjacent street, Devon Lane Ed Moen and Robert Winkler were present. Polston moved and Dornsbach seconded a motion to recommend the vacation of Devon and approve the subdivision of Lots 10-13, Block 9, Seton as requested. The vote was unanimously in favor. 12. Lake Front and Side Yard Variance Lot 6, Block 2, Mound Terrace Donald Furry was present Planning Commission Minutes June 30, 1980 - Page 3 ·. ,i! BOARD OF APPEALS (Continued) 12. Polston moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to recommend denying variance for 5 foot chain link fence in lakefront setback. The vote was Polston and Paulsen in favor of the denial: Dornsback was againstt Stannard and Peterson abstained. 1. Street Vacation - Brunswick from Essex West Mr. Oveson was now present. Stannard moved and Dornsbach seconded a motion to recommend street vacation as requested. The vote was unanimously in favor. 7. Side Yard Variance Lots lO and Part of ll, Block 2, The Highlands Polston moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to table to next Board of Appeals meeting on July 28th. The vote was unanimously in favor. Sign Variance Rev. McClelland was present to request a sign variance for temporary sign(s) to be put up for the United Crusade - Lowell Lundstrom (Crusade to be July 27 through August 3) Polston moved and Stannard seconded a motion to recommend permit be granted for signs on a temporary basis for period from about July 17 through August 3; fee be waived; signs placed so as to not obstruct the view for traffic purposes. The vote was unanimously in favor. Environmental Assessment Moundwood Townhouses Paulsen moved and Dornsbach seconded a motion to concur.with the Environmental Assessment which has been completed. The vote was unanimously in favor. ~port Center Polston moved and Stannard seconded a motion to recommend that setbacks of building be at least 30 feet from lot line on North and East and l0 feet from lot line on South. The vote was unanimously in favor. Adjournment Stannard moved and Dornsbach seconded a motion to adjourn; all in favor, so adjourned. Attest: City of Mound From: To: Date: Subject City Inspector Planning Commission June 26, 1980 Board of Appeals meeting of 6-30-80 o o o Elv|n A. Overson, 2873 Essex Lane Street Vacation - Brunswick from Essex Lane west. No. We may need right-of-way for drainage way purposes and also might possibly be blocking buildable lands. Fred Haynie, 6320 Linden Lane Side Yard Variance - Lot 4, Blk. 2, Mound Terrace Side yard and lake front variance. Porposed addition on lake front side is in front of two abutting structures on either side of property. However, the two foot proposed addition is more than 50 feet from the shoreline. The property is nonconforming use because of 1-1/2 foot side yard deficiency. I cannot foresee any problem in allowing this existing nonconforming use to . expand. E. Allen Schmidto 5049 Three Poi~ts Blvd. Front & Side Yard Variance - Lot 7, Blk. 16, Shadywood Pt. Previous application in 1978 brought about a split vote from Planning Com- mission and City Council denied request 8-8-78. The request was for the same as proposed now. Oswin Pflug, 4851 Shoreline Blvd. Special Use Permit - Lots 5-11 & 14-19, Blk. 1, Shirley Hills Unit A To allow no exterior Storage for any type of vehicle be it land or water Craft; waiting for repair. Harvey Reder Subdivision of Land - LOts 11-14 & 19-22, Blk. 11, Wychwood All proposed subdivisions will meet the zoning requirements for square footage as buildable sites. Dale A Anderson, 4839 Shoreline Blvd. (Photographic Systems Co.) Sign Variance - Blk. 1, Shirley Hills Unit A Do not feel a sign this large is necessary for this type of business. Robert C. Elken, 3032 Highland Blvd. Side Yard Variance - Lot 10 & part of 11, Blk. 2, The Highlands Suggest tabling until a survey is submitted. Harvey Reder Lots 15 & 16, Blk. 11, Wychwood Do not-understand reason for application. Board of Appeals meeting of 6-30~80 continued: page two 10. 11. 12. HT/dd Our Lady of the Lake Church Temporary Sign Permit -Super Valu parking lot Approve temporary sign request, Steinmetz, Schnabel and O'Hai'r Street Vacation -Dorchester from west edge of Lot 5, Blk 10, Wychwood to Essex Lane Would approve street vacation provided the City retain a 20 foot utility easement to be 10 feet on either side of center line of right-of-way and only if deemed necessary by the City Engineer. Edward J. Moen Subdivision of Land - Lots 10-13, Blk. 9, Seton Suggest tabling unless plat plan of proposal is submitted. writi'ng.) Donald Furry, 6332 Rambler Lane Fence Height Variance -Lot 6, Blk. 2, Mound Yerrao6,~ Am against variance for height of fences on lake front setbacks (None as of this CITY 0i: HOUN9 LEGAL DESCRTPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY A~ t LIf. AN~: PLAT PARC[-:L FOR REQUEST ': Tel. - No. Resi. de~a~na owners .o~f~goperty abutting the s~eet to be vacated: ' ~ ~',~' ~~~ . ' ~ /C ~ -' " ' /~..~ . ~, . ...._ .. ~, .... . . , . , ~- ~;>.~..:.:d. d~t~ ~',. '... , _ . . ~. ' '___~_z .... ~~,~, ~., ._./.~-'-'z/'-- :"..~.' . .: _ .. Recommended by UtJ. lities: NSP ~'; Minnegasco /'', Continental Tel. Rc(:ommended t~y City:. Public %'7orks /; Fire Chief ~; En~;i~eer Police Chief l'].anr,ing Comm'i.s;.--;i on F. cco::u~t,~nd~ Lion: Co:mc:i] Ac t' J.o.-~ Da t£: BEDFORD 3O i' R0~D .~t'Jl 45 Z7.. :: 7 BRUNSWICK RICHMOND DORCHESTER MANCHESTER '. '-"-' c-> . a GORDON .HAMPTON; : ROAD '-I ROAD 'l 6 Address 6320 Linden tune Tele phone~ 72_ 3401 Numb e r __ $FEE $ ZONING A-2 25.00 PROPERTY · ADDRESS 6320 Linden Lane PLAT 61890 PARCEL 1600 14-117-24 32 0014 .LO T 4 B LOCK 2 Mound Terrace , ADDITION fee owner INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address Telephone Numb e r /,,/f,,~_A RLA NC E RE~0UESTED: FRONT I~ I ACCESSORY YARD [ ~T.I BUILDING NOTE: YARD /, 6 FT.. LOT SIZE FT. REAR "'YARD ~~' FT.[ LOT SQ. N. C. U. * or OTHER (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z, Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property, Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3, Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. A building permit must be applied for withiJ one year from the date of the council resolution or variance granted, becomes null and void .... APPLICANT )/~,~-~-/~' 2~'~-'~~ DATE ~ _ 7-/ -~ ./: '- / ~ ~ S~gn~ture PLANNING COMMiSSION RECO1V[M~NDATION Grant variances requested recognizing ,on-conformi.ng use; with stipulation that if deck area screened, they put in permanent footings. DATE June 30, ]980 COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO.. DATE ' I .~ 'L~ ~ O- / · ~, /.: ~E / Certificate of' Survey for ~'red J. HaynJ, e of Lot g, Block 2, f.lo~and Terrace Hennepin Counter, Minnesota ! hereby certify that this is a true and eo:'rect representation of a s'0c,'vey of the boundaries of Lot ~: Bloc'.,: 2', l,lot~nd Terrace, the location or all existing bui!dina.-s therean, an.fi the arocosed lcr. atior, of' a orcposed ~ddi- tion to an e×;_st2'n[~ building, it does not purp:}rt to sho'~ other prove:::ents or encroachments. APPLICATION FC~VAI~ANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME OF APPLiCANT E, ALLEN.. SCHM!DT _5049 Three Points Blvd, Address ~ound Telephone Number 4?2-2962 FEE $ ZONING PROPERTY ADDRESS PLAT. 6!,980 PARCEL 6710 ADDITION SHADYW00D POINT INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address Telephone Numb e r VARL~NCE REQUESTED: NOTE: FRONT [ I ACCESSORY[ YARD 6 FT, BUILDING 16x36 FT, YARD 3,3 FT, LOT SIZE REAR[ [ LOTSQ. YARD FT. FOOTAGE 6,075.8 N. C.U.* or OTHER (describe) REASON FOR REQUEST: 1, Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. To be able to finish my basement and, use it as a livi~ area, rather than use it as a storage.area. A council resolution or variance granted becomes null and void. Variances are not~t~a~s, ferabl_~. ~ ' . n APPLICANT ,~.-~ ~c'_~~ DATE Signature building perrr, it must be applied for within one year from the date of the June 10, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Motion to grant was defeated by a 3 to Ju~e 30, 1980 COUNCIL ACTION: RESO'%~O~O DATE *non- conforming use / . /: / Certificate of Su~ey: I hereby ceftin, that this is a true and correct represen~tian of a su~ey of th~ ~mdaries of ~t 7 and the Northeasterly 3.5 feet of Lot 8, BLock 16, Shadywood Point, and the location of ail existing bu.[icings thereon. It does not pure}ri tc s~mw other imprisonments or 1" --: 3iD' 6-7-77 Iron Lan6 Su_%'e};or and Planne. r Len6 Lai:~:, ]'tinn-:;$oN.t CITY OF 1ViOUND b Address NAME OF Te le phone Numbe r%ZZ-Z? g ~ ADnlTION From OWNER (if other than applicant) Address $ 0.0, ZONING ! PROPERTY ,.LOT ~--~ .... . BLOCK Telephone Numb e r .~y~A~~D~~ E REQUESTED: NOTE: I ACCESSORY ~ FT. BUILDING j, FT3 YARD ' LOT SIZE . ,, YARD ..... FT. LOT SQ. FOOTAGE N. C. U.'"-.- or OTHER (describe) ¢ REASON FOR REQUEST: "J.~ c ? ' 'T'tt~ /~<,,']z'~,,,'.-' o ,,:r 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing. 3. Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward 're que st. building permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the c'buncil resolution or variance granted becomes null.and void. APPLICANT Lk,%'t~, -. ,- --0 '.- ¢ ~'~-'-~J~, DATE ..... Signature . NING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Grant a 6 foot front yard variance; deny the side yard variance. DATE July 31, 1978 COUNCIL ACTION: Concur with the Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO 78-369 to deny the requested side yard variance~ but approve the 6 foot front yard variance. DATE August 8, 1978 *n~m-conformin~ use /,.,~ ~' ~ Councilmember Withhart moved the following resolution, RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE REQUESTED SIDE YARD .............. VARIANCE, BUT APPROVE THE SIX FOOT FRONT YARD VARIANCE WHEREAS, owner of property described as Lots 7 & 8, Block 16, Woodland Point has requested a 6 ft. front street variance and a 3.3 ft. side yard variance, and WHEREAS', said request would allow the building of a garage, and WHEREAS, owner has tried to purchase property adjoining his, but was denied purchase', and WHEREAS, proposed garage can be reduced in size to conform with the side yard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND,' MINNESOTA: That Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission and denies the 3~3 ft side yard variance but agrees to al.low.the 6 ft. street' front variance for the purpose of erecting a garage. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilperson Swenson,.and upon vote being taken thereon,-the following voted in favor thereof: Fenstad, Lovaasen, Polston, Swenson and Withhart, the follow- ing voted against the same: none, whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. Atte~/~: .City Clerk s/Tim Lovaasen Mayor APPL~I ;ATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE OWNER 0swin Pflug PLAT 6199.0 PARCEL 0650 ADDRESS 4851 Shoreline Blvd., Mound, Minn. 55364 TELEPHONE 472-3422 LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY shZrley HiZZs "Unit A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 5 - 11 and 14 - 19 Block 001 Comm~cial ZONING SPECIAL USE PERMIT (use) for 'FZE~gla~s and Boat-repair 4851 Shorel~e Blvd., Mound M Address Tel. No. 412-3422 Applicant's Interest in Property State why this use, if granted, would not be contrary to the general purpose and intent of the ordinance to secure public health, safety, general welfare, and sub- stantial justice. PLANNING COMMISSlON RECOMMENDATION: Permit be granted with two stipulations: l) Limit outside storage parking of vehicles or boats to I0 & they be inside fenced are 2) No outside~_~andin9 or fiberglassing. DATE Jun~ 30, ]980 COUNCIL ACTION__ Resolu[ion no. DATE APP It:ATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF LAND Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND FEE $ 2/0. O0 PLAT PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: ~,~ tl- ),2- i'~ - 2',/ ~ ) ~ ZONING To be divided as follows: ~ /I (attach survey or s' building sites, squatPLANNING COMHISSiON - PLEASE NOTE: Surveys for Lots 13 & 1/~, 19 & 20 and 21 & 22, Block Pembroke on file. Similar to attached, 80' X ~0' in A WAIVER IN LOTSIZE tS REQUESTEE but no 5t.ructu.reA New Lot No. From Square feet TO Square feet siz, Reason: TEL. NO. DATE This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or anexplan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: To grant redivision of lots as requested. DATE June 30, 1980 APPLICATION FO~ARIANC~ CITY OF MOUND Telephone Number INTEREST IN PROPERTY ~q-~ ~0 FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address ~-~ ~ktS\9-~ iV\ ~_ FEE $ ZONING ~---0 ADDRESS ,,,LOT ~ BLOGK IX ,, ." Telephone Number VARIANCE REQUESTED: NOTE: FRONTI FT.] ACCESSORYI FT.] YARD B UI LDING SIDE YARD I FT.[ LOT SIZE J FT.J REARI [ LOTSQ. YARD FT,.. FOOTAGE 1. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. Z, Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertin~~~ by extending survcq~¢--~ ar~g..~..--~, ~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~["]' ~'7~'~'j I ~ ~ 'k.,- '~ ~ ~ " 3, Attach letters ~2,m~~~Ct~ property owners s ~o ng ard~{ OTHER (describe)_:/' 1 _O REASON FOR REQUEST: A building permit must be applied for withirf one year from the date of the council resolution or variance granted becomes null and void. Variances are not tr~n_sferable~ ,.. ~ APPLICANT ~ '~'/~/~~e-~/2'~~/ DATE ~ --//~--~/-~ Signature PLANNING COMM_[SSION RECOMMENDATION from dusk to midnight and be on face of building. Approve sign permit - sign to be lighted ,lun~ 30, DATE !980 COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO._ DATE non- conforming us e APP LICA TION FO~ARIANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME OF Address Telephone Numb e r __ }Request fee be waived. FEE $ ZONING ADDRESS PLAT PARCEL LOT BLOCK ADDITION INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Addre s s Telephone Numb e r VARIANCE REQUESTED: FRONT YARD NOTE: FT.] ACCESSORY [B HI LDI NG FT.] YARD LOT SIZE REAR [ LOT SQ. YARD FT.[ FOOTAGE l_. Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2, Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property, Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing, 3, Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing ·attitude toward request. A building perrnit must be applied for within one year from the date of the council resolution or variance granted becomes null and void. Variances are not transferable. //~ PLANNING COMM2[SSION P,m, CO~v~MEND~A~A/ON Grant sign permit with provision that signI be parked in such a manner so as not to impair traffic vision; fee be waived. DATE June 30, ]980 COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO DATE 7 *non-conforming use CtTY OF APPLICANT ADDRESS APPLICATION FOR STREET VACATION CITY OF MOUND Robert Steinmetz - 4700 Manchester Road ( Richard L Schnabbl - 4720 Manchester Road (Mound, Mn. 55364 G_Ea///:,O'~/r__- 6725 RJ~c/0mopx~---Road ( See below:(*) LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY APPLICA~T: PLAT PARCEL LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION STR~ET TO BE VACATED Dorchester Road from West b'oundary of Lot 5, Block 10, and West boundary of Lot 28, Block 11, Wychwood, to the intersection of Dorchester Road and Essex Lane. To eliminate the unuseable and injurious double front of the REASON FOR REQUEST 'City's Zoning 0rdance so as to allow more useable property for the abutting property owners'. Tel. No. Applicant's Interest in Property. owners Residents and owners of property abutting the street to be vacated: (*) Grant 0'Hair - Lots 4-5-6-7-27-28 & 29, Block 11, Wychwood PID 19-117-23 32 0117 City of Mound - Lots 1-2-30-31 & 32, Block 11, Wychwood PID 19-117-23 32 Ol14+Ol16+O129 Richard Schnabel - Lots 3-4-5-29 & 30, Block 10, Wychwood PID 19-117-23 32 0098 Robert Steinmetz - Lots 1-2-31 & 32, Block 10, Wychwood PID 19-117-23'32 O099+Ol12+Ol13 Recommended by Utilities: NSP. ~7~,_; Minnegasco ~_~; Recommended by City: Public Works ~.~; Fire Chief Continental Tel. ; Engineer Police Chief -',: . N OA3 Ci APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF Soc. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF: MOUND LAND FEE $ ~'-,..,~¢ (,2("~') PLAT PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: ZONING (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER' IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From . Square feet TO Square feet Reason: TEL. NO. /"//'Z3 '%-~ (~ ~ ~ O,T Applicant's interest in the property: This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the property, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Approve subdivision with street vacation. DATE June 30, 1980 O)%PPI,ICA'9%ON I.'OR STICEET VACATIO~ CITY OF MOUND ,LEGAL DEsCRiPTION OF PROPERTY OWNED By APPL~CANT: PLAT PARCEL BLOCK SUBDIVISION, ,.~ ~.~ ~--'"/,~/~,~,, STREET TO BE VACATED SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT · ..,. Applicant's Interest in'Property ' o WEN.. No. /-/75'--3~- oPLP Residents and owners .of property abutting the street to ba vacated: ,~- ~~~,c-~/~:~,~o~_~,,,,~,, ~,~ ~.~:~ -. Continental Tel. Recommendr.:d by City: Police Chief Public Works ~-~ ; Fire ; Engineer ; CO~MBI~D C~ V~IIE:3 7 APP LI CA TION F(~VARIANCE CITY OF MOUND Telephone ADDITION .5 } PROPERTY.5 PLAT CO1%~.0 PARCEL /200 B LOCK , INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address Telephone Numb e r V/~. ,iR~ ~IqCE R/EQUESTED: YARD ~ g~'~ FT.I BUILDING SIDE ~ F~ YARD ., YARD FT. LOT SIZE NOTE: FT.[ 1, Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings .on property and abutting streets. Z. Give ownership and dimensions of adjoining property.. Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application LOT SQ. /z~, ~gTZ ~.~. ,~ b3.Y extending survey or drawing' FOOTAGE .... 0 _ Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward N. C. U. * or request. OTHER (describe) X . . REASON FOR REQUEST: .l_ \,,'~Gtnf¥ ~-O ~NCE mU QQt~ 'A ibhilding:~ermit must be applied for within one year from the date of the council resolution or variance granted becomes null and void. Variances are not transferable.~ APPLICANT ~6~% V ~-~TJ0~J~ DATE TO~v9 [q~0 , - SignatureO PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Denying variance for 5 foot chain link fence in lakefront setback. DATE June 30, 1980 COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO DATE ee ~e wa~ve-'~"~T'. APPLICATION rARIANCE CITY OF MOUND NAME OF ; ~ j FEE $ ZONING PARCEL Address LOT Telephone Number ADDITION B LOCK INTEREST IN PROPERTY FEE OWNER (if other than applicant) Address Telephone Numb e r VARIANCE REQUESTED: NOTE: FRONT [ [ ACCESSORY[ YARD FT. BUILDING FT. YARD ...... FT. LOT SIZE FT:, REAR [ LOT SQ. ---YARD FT.[ FOOTAGE N. C. U. * or 1, Attach a survey AND scale drawing showing location of proposed improvement in relation to lot lines, other buildings on property and abutting streets. 2, Give ownership and dimensions of . adjoining property, Show approximate locations of all buildings, driveways, and streets pertinent to the application by extending survey or drawing, 3, Attach letters from adjoining affected property owners showing attitude toward request. OTHER (describe)J~',' ? ~ . /' . - i / . A building permit must be applied for within one year from the date of the council resolution or variance granted becomes null and void. Variances are not. transferable. Signature ff / / PLANNING COMM_[SSION RECOM1Vf~NDATION Grant sign permit on temporary basis from about July 17 through August 3; fee be waived; signs placed so as to not obstruct the view, for traffic purposes. DATE June 30,,,1980 COUNCIL ACTION: RESOLUTION NO DATE *non-conforrninff use l.~-& (o 7-8-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, M~nnesota July 1, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-231 SUBJECT: Delinquent Utility Bills Attached is a list of past due water and sewer accounts. These accounts are over six months past due and should be turned off for non-payment. In order to turn off the water, the Council should hold a public hearing. A suggested date for the public hearing would be August 5. rd L. Kopp /' · 7-1-8o DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS (Over Six Months Old) ACCOUNT NUMBER 22-235-2314-91 22-238-4891-81 22-238-4957-71 23-238-5005-41 22-238-5055-91 22-259-5901-01 22-259-6070-31 22-274-2920-21 22-292-6033-21 22-310-2695-21 22-310-3148-11 22-310-3160-61 22-310-3198-61 22-343-1790-31 22-343-1800-01 22-343-2606-01 22-373-5063-81 22-404-5039-11 22-404-5043-31 TOTAL AMOUNT $ 55.50 60.60 72.20 65.18 81.80 65.64 82.14 52.60 254.64 7O.7O 50.56 113.46 42.63 92.06 57.5O 74.30 93.06 145.63 105.20 $1,635.40 7-8-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota July 2, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-59 SUBJECT: 1981 Levy Limit Attached is a copy of the information received from the State showing our levy limit for 1981 will be $872,665 compared with $804,468 last year. This is a $68,197 increase in funds. We haven't found out yet what our state aids will be. Last year we asked for the increase tO the 5th percentile of all cities in the county, so we can not do that again. STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING SAINT pAUL, MINNESOTA 55143 June 27, 1980 PHONE: TO: THE FINANCE OFFICERS OF CITIES AND TOWNS SUBJECT TO THE 8% LEVY LIMITATION (MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 275.50 TO 275.56, AS AMENDED) THE DETERMINATION OF W~ICH CITIES AND TOWNS HAVE 1980/1981 LEVY LIMIT BASES PER CAPITA THAT ARE BELOW 85 PERCENT OF THE AVERAGE 1980/1981 LEVY LIMIT BASE PER CAPITA FOR THE CITIES AND TO~S WITHIN THE SAM~ COUNTY As required under Minnesota Statutes, 1979 Supplement, Section 275.52, Subdivision 4(d), the Department of Revenue has determined for each county the average 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita for those cities and towns in the county that are subject to the 8% levy limitation. This provision permits any city or town which has a levy limit base per capita that is below 85% of the average for its county to apply for an adjustment to its 1980/1981 levy limit base. The enclosed table shows the 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita for each city and town in your county subject to the 8% levy limitation, the average levy limit base per capita, and 85% of the average. A city which is joint in two or more counties is considered one of the cities subject to the 8% levy limitation within each of these counties. The following is an explanation of the table: Column Description Payable 1980 levy limit base before any street maintenance and refuse collection adjustments and before the deduction of 1980 aids. Payable 1980 levy limit base adjustment for street maintenance and refuse collection claimed on the payable 1980 Form 280. Base adjustment for one-half of the payable 1980 special levy for increased industrial and commercial development costs which cannot be claimed as a special levy for taxes payable in 1981. Adjusted levy limit base (columns 1 + 2 + 3). Payable 1981 levy limit base (column 4 X 1.08; 1.06 for Duluth, Minneapolis and St. Paul). 6 The levy limit population for the taxes payable year 1980. Levy limit base per capita (column 5 ~ column 6) County average levy limit base per capita (column 7 ~ number of cities/towns subject to levy limits). 85% of the county average levy limit base per capita (column 8 X .85). (O V E R) AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER If a town or a city entirely within one county has a 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita in column 7 which is below 85% of the average 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita of its county, shown in colum 9, application may be made to the Levy Limitations Review Board to have its 1980/1981 levy limit base adjusted by an amount sufficient to increase the town or city's 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita to 85% of the average. If a joint city has a 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita in column 7 which is below 85% of the average 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita of one or more of the counties containing it, shown in column 9, application may be made to the Levy Limitations Review Board to have the city's 1980/1981 levy limit base adjusted. For each county where the city's 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita is below 85% of the average, the difference between 85% of the average and the city's 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita would be multiplied by the portion of the population of the city in that county; and this amount would be added to the 1980/1981 base. To apply for a 1980/1981 levy limit base adjustment under Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.52, Subdivision 4(d) from the Levy Limitations Review Board, address a letter requesting the adjustment to me. Ordinarily, a town or a city requests that the levy limit base adjustment be the largest amount possible, since once it has received a base adjustment under Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.52, Subdivision 4(d), it cannot apply for another base adjustment under any of the clauses of Subdivision 4. However, if a city or town received an adjustment to 80% of the county average levy limit base per capita prior to June 1, 1979, and its 1980/1981 levy limit base per capita is below 85% of the county average, it may still avail itself of this one time opportunity to increase its levy limit base per capita to 85% of the county average. To assist this Division in scheduling meetings of the Levy Limitations Review Board and in calculating the 8% levy limitations, the application for a levy limit base adjustment should be received by the Department of Revenue prior to August 1, 1980. The members of the Levy Limitations Review Board are the Commissioner of Revenue, the Chairman of the Minnesota Municipal Board, and a public member appointed by the Governor. Representatives of the town or city are not required to attend the meeting of the Board to recieve this base adjustment. / If you have any questions, please feel free Very truly yours, WALLACE O. DAHL, DIRECTOR Local Government Aids and Analysis Division Phone No. (612) 296-2246 to contact me. \ WOD/RBG/mls Enclosure ~ o .~-~.-4 -i'1 E:~,-r.,.. --'m~.~ -?' ~rll ?. ...r._m ,-4--I I'rl 70 .0 7'0 CURTIS A, PEARSON J. DENNIS O' BRIEN ,JOHN E. DRAWZ GLENN E. PURDUE J~-FFREY J. STRAND THOHAS D. CREIGHTON LAW OFFICES b-FEVERE, LEFLER, PEARSON, O' BRIEN & DRAWZ I100 F|RST NATIONAL BANK I~UILDING MINNEAPOLIS, JvllNNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE (612) 333-0543 July 2, 19 80 BROOKLYN CENTER OFFICES 610 BROOKDALE TOWERS ;>810 COUNTY ROAD tO BROOKLYN CENTER, ~INNESOTA S5430 (612) 561- 3~'00 RICHARD J. SCHIEFFER Mr. William J. Keefer Attorney at Law 2408 Central Avenue N.E. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55418 Re: Thomas vs. City of ~4ound and Midland Nursery Dear Mr. Keefer: This will confirm our telephone conversation of July 2, 1980. You have not been contacted by Mr. Rooney but this will confirm a meeting to be held in my office on the morning of July 8, 1980 at 11:00 o'clock A.M. Mr. Rooney was going to be calling you to arrange the meeting. You have Asked for some information from me to aid. you in preparing for the meeting and hopefully to help resolve this particular problem. In accordance with that I am enclosing.a copy of a summary sheet prepared by the engineers concerning the work up until last week done by Hardri.ves to complete the work. The total of th'at work is $45,658.81. There is then a breakdown as to how those charges have been allocat.ed and it appears from the engineers deter- ruination that $26,130.71 to that date would be charged against Thomas. I believe this will be helpful to you in preparing for the meeting. You have also asked me for copies of correspondence which took place in 1979. I have previously indicated to you that I believe that your argument is with Thomas as is ours. We do not have a contrac- tual arrangement with Midland and my basic purpose is to be sure that everybody i~s properly advised so that we can move forward as quickly as possible. I am therefore enclosing for your benefit copies of some of the correspondence which took place which may aid you in your evaluation of the case so that you may properly advise your client. I enclose herewith the following documents: LAW OFFICES LEFEVERE, LEFLER, PEAR,SON, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ Mr. William J. Keefer Page 2 July 2, 19 80 1. Copy of a letter of June 13, 1979 from the City Engineer to me. 2. Copy of letter of June 18 from me to Mr. Thomas. Copy of letter from Thomas Rooney to me under date of June 22, 1979. 4. Copy of a le%%er of July 10, 1979 from me to Mr. Thomas. Be Copy of a letter of July 24, 1979 from me to Thomas Rooney's o f fi ce. Copy of letter under date of July 25, 1979 from the City Engineer to Thomas. e e Copy of letter of July 31, 1979 from Thomas Rooney to me re Progress on improvements. Copy of letter under date of August 21, 1979 to Thomas from Leonard Kopp, City Manager. Unexecuted copy of draft resolution terminating the 1978 street construction with Thomas. This was ad.opted by the City but may have involved some minor modifications or amendments. I look forward to seeing you on Tuesday, the 8th. Very truly you~~ --. CAP: ms Enclosures cc: Mr. Thomas Rooney Mr. Leonard Kopp A-2 03 Government Center ,300 South Sixth Street I/L! June 25, 1980 The Honorable Tim Lovaasen Mayor of the City.of Mound 5341Maywood Road :~Mound, MN 55364 Dear Mayor Lovaasen: Re: Assessment Costs for the 1981 Assessment This office has 'recently completed a review of the cost of preparing the 1980 assessments in our Contract areas. We have. recommended and the County Board has .passed a resolution establishing the actual costs for that work, done largely in .1979 as the base for charging for the 1980 work done on the 1981 assessment. The ~costs are only "out of pocket" appraiser costs and the costs of administration, 'clerical, mailing and other incidental expenses are not charged for this work. It also should be noted that we will soon have all residential property charac- teristics computerized which could be of significant benefit to your city if data on age stratific~ti~price stratification, or other physical characteristic "]~:i. Our estimate o/f/~$35~225 for ~assessing services includes an estimate of new 'il. construction ~p~_raisals as wel~ as the actual amount of our cost based on your '~current count\qf Residential ,?Commercial-Industrial and Vacant Land parcels. ~ Actual new con's~ruction co~t~ be more or less than estimated which would raise or -- lower this final~'~fg~'h~ext year slightly. If you should need any more detail or have any questions, please feel free to write or call this office. ] Very trulY your.s., . , DO~AL~ F, ~ONK Hennepin County Assessor DFM: vmj CC: Leonard L. Kopp, Mgr. HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer L0 MINNETONKA CONSERVATION ICT L.M.C.D. MEETING SCHEDULE ~uly & August,. 1980 Wednesday 7-16-80 Public Hearings: City of Deephaven New License & Variance W. Grady Sieff Variance 7:30 p.m., LMCD Office, Wayzata~ Wednesday 7-23-80 Annual LMCD Board Members' Lake Inspection Tour 5 p.m. aboard "Dowager Empress," Wayzata depot docks Saturday 8- 2-80 Annual Conference for Public Officials 3 p.m. aboard "Lady of the Lake," Excelsior docks Saturday 8- 9-80 Saturday Monday 8-16-80 8-18-80 Water Structures & Environment Committee 7:30 a.m., Harts Cafe, Wayzata Executive Committee 7:30 a.m., Harts Cafe, Wayzata Lake Use Committee 4:30 p.m.,.LMCD Office, Wayzata Wednesday 8-27-80 Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors 8 p.m., Tonka Bay Village Hall 4901Manitou Road (County Road 19) 7-1-80 METROPOLITAN Suite 300 Metro Square Building, MEMORANDUM TO: CITIES OF: c StC. ~aUulN, Minnes.o~t.~ 55~k~// June 26, 1980 ~ Shorewood, Excelsior, Tonka Bay, Deephaven Woodland, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Victoria, Orono, Mound, Minnetrista, Chanhassen COUNTIES OF: Hennepin, Scott SUBJECT: Michelson Media, Inc. Cable Service Territory Proposal for Shorewood Area Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 8541-1 The Metropolitan Council has received for review the Cable service territory proposal identified above. A copy. of this letter of transmittal to us is attached. The Council must review this proposal and would appreciate your comments on the proposal, particularly issues you would want examined by the Council. Such comments should be received by July 19, 1980 Sincerely, ~ferral Coordinator . JR:emp ~ICKELSON MEDIA, i CABLE-TELEVISION GROUP NORTHERN.OPERATIONS PROPOSAL FOR A CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY For the Cities of Shorewood, Excelsior, Tonka Bay, Deephaven, Woodland, Greenwood Mickelson Media, Inc. of New Ulm, Minnesota hereby sub- mits the required documents for the above named CST. Inquiries concerning the proposal may be directed to: Hubertus Sarrazin or Dennis E. Pellant P.O. Box 492 Hastings, Minnesota 55033 Phone: 612-437-3530 June 20, 1980 955 HIGHWAY 55 or BOH 492 - HASTINGS MINNESOTA 55033 / ~-.C'-/ (612)437- 3530 - MIC LSON MEDIA, CABLE TELEVISION ®ROUP NORTHERN OPERATIONS CST for Shorewood, Tonka Bav, Excelsior, Woodland, Greenwood, Deephaven (DemoqraDhic Data) City Popul. Households Land/Acres Homes/Acre Shorewood 4,580 1,524 3,68~~ .41 Tonka Bay 1,470 534 623 .85 Excelsior 2,890 1,203 448 2.68 Woodland 550 187 386 .48 Greenwood 590 248 350 .71 Deephaven 3,670 1,264 1,526 .83 13,750 4,960 7,019 ouseholds sole mile 36 56' 96 43'' 54 49 (aLo not include water acerage for any city listed. Data Sources: 1. Metropolitan Council reports of population estimates and completed housing as of April 1, 1979 2. Metropolitan Council Resource Report ~3, June 1978 3. Estimated by MMi based opon 85% of' street miles as determined by Minnesota Department of Transportation. 955 HIGHWAY 55 or BOH 492 · HASTINGS MINNESOTA 55035 (612)437- 5530 0 WESTONKA COMMUNITY SERVICES 5600 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mound City Council Don Ulrick, Community Services Supervisor First Annual 8 Kilometer MAZE RUN J~une 23, 1980 On Saturday, August 2, 1980, the Community Services will host the First Annual 8 Kilometer MAZE RUN through the neighborhoods of Mound. This run will start across from the Mound Medical Clinic in the north parking lot of the Mound School Building. The run is planned to go north on Belaire to Elm, then west to Grandview Drive through the neighborhoods in Brookton and back to a crossing on Commerce Boulevard by the tennis courts. The event will continue towards Seton to the point where Edgewater Drive crosses County Road #15 by the Westonka Animal Hospital. It will then continue through the neighborhoods and come out near the Shirley Hills School, then down Lakewood Lane to Bartlett Boulevard, continue on Bartlett to Commerce and north on Commerce to Auditors Road, then. east past the Laker Office and finish on the municipal parking lot th6t is across from Johnson Printing Office. The activity will start at 9:30 A.M. and should have cleared the streets by 10:30 A.M., and crowd dispersed by 11:00 A.M. The route of the run will in- cldde a midpoint stop for water and time indication by the run officials. There will be a series of markers that are temporary in nature which will be put in place and removed after the race. The construction of the streets in the Brook- ton are may very well cause a route change. The idea at this time is to expand the run by including more streets in the area east of the school and in the general area of the Belmont Apartments. The P61ice Reserve and the Police Explorer Scouts (with their Mopeds) have been requested to provide a total of twelve people. We have received a tentative offer of manpower from one of the local organizations. This activity is a cooperative venture with the business community to be a part of a summertime community gettogether. At this~time their plans are in the development stage and therefore I cannot indicate their other activities. The entire concept'of this event is directed to the casual runner and not the advance quality marathon type of individual. In many cases, to date, the entries are from husband and wife. Enclosed you will note that we even give a certificate to the "near trophy winners". Enclosed is a sample of the map and entry blank for the event. If you have any questions, please send them my way or call me at 472-1600, ext. 240, 241, 242. DU/db Enc: Registration Blank and Run Route (road consturction may cause changes) Wes~onka 8-Kilometer (5 mile) b~ZE TROPHY STP~.TEGY RUN SATURDAY, AUGUST 2, 1980; 9:30 a.m. INTERSECTION OF HENNEPIN COUNTY 15 & 110 IN MDUND SPONSORS: Westonka Sports; Westonka Co~aunity Services; Participanns Are you tired of those competitive runs where the same ten always finish ahead of the pack??? Then join us for a most unique strategy trophy run. This 8-K course loops, turns right & left, goes up and down, and even s~raig~n throughout the City of Mound. Participants have to pick out the arrow marked course signs as they go. There is an inverse start with the slowest to the front and the fastest ~o the back. Showers, toilets, and lockers are available at the Mound Elementary School where the ru~ begins. Bring Own towel aacl lock. Ten trophies are up for grabs. Ail finishers receive "place ribbons". "!~ear" ~rophy winners receive $2 certificates for next year's run. Ten BR!LL~k!~ runners/joggers will each receive a ~rophy for: Firs~ Female Regis~raat; First Male Registrant; First Female Finisher; First !.!ale Finisher; Oldest Female Finisher; Oldest Male Finisher; Tenth Finisher; 25 Finisher; 50. Finisher; 75 Finisher. A special trail duster award will also be made. The star~ is at the Mound Elementary Building Wes~ Alley (near the junction of Hennepin County 15 &'il0 - across the street from Super America- in Beautiful Downtown Mound. One water stop is provided (Lake Minnetonka); split time and place at 4-K. Pre-registration cost is $2.00. Day of event (~:00-9:00 a.m.); $4.00. This run is on in all weather except a tornado. A cool down jog of one mile brings you to Surfside Beach where swim~ing and picnicing are .available. Chuck Peterson. is race director (we wanted Rogers, but even though Chuck screws up occasionally, he is free). Magla Print first & !as~ --- detach · , Age Screa~ & Ci%y Phone Zip I hereby release Wes~onka CormnuniZy Se~v_c.s~ ~ ° and .__=~1 other sponsoring agencies and/er individuals from responsibi!i~y for any injuries or damages I may suffer as a r~u!~ of my participation in ~his evenn. I' have read certify my compliance by my signature below. I a!*so understand ~hat entry f=~s ~ 9a7 are non-refundable. signature o; ~ ~ ~ pa.~-c~pan~ b[ail with your $2 ~o %;estonka Co~munity Services, 5620 Lynwo~d, Hound, 55364 RD, WESTWO00 OR Woo 'Point Loke ~.FE RNSIO~' 4. ORIFTWOOO LA. LYNWOOD 'z: 'l.- L on gdon £oke Ho YY/£0 n Bluff, WE~IT- W( BEACHWOOO :L_£N wOOD aC FAIflFIEL ~ WOo0 ~s! hie Point DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Ay. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 935-3381 Mr. Leonard L. Kopp City Manager City of Mound 341Ma3a~ood Road Mound, MN 55364 Re: Parking on CSAH 125 near Black Lake Bridge Dear Leonard: As requested by the city our department has investigated the problems caused by parked vehicles on CSAH 125 just south of the Black Lake bridge. Space for parking approximately 12 vehicles has been designated on the east side of the roadway. As you are well aware, this is an extremely popular place for fishermen to park. Even on weekdays.during the fishing season it is not unusual to observe 8 to 10 vehicles parked in the designated area. This is the only spot available for parking within a reasonable distance, since all other parking is prohibited on both sides of CSAH 125 from the Wilshire to CSAH 15. The designated area is also somewhat remote from any residences, therefore having negligible adverse effect on the neighborhood. The location is presently provided with a satilite and trash containers for sanitary purposes. With recreational parking already at a premium in the lake area, the county would be very reluctant to prohibit parking at this location. There are a couple of improvements that can be undertaken that may help ease. the parking problems and provide more comfort for passing motorists. Some areas of the shoulder are uneven and eroded to some extent. Additional crushed rock could provide a level, smooth surface for the parked vehicles. Brush and other undergrowth overhangs the shoulder effectively narrowing its width. Removal of some of this would provide a wider shoulder allowing vehicles to park further from the roadway edge. Both these potential improvements will be brought to the attention of our Environmental Department for implementation. Should you care to discuss this problem further, please call me at your convenience. Herbert O. Klossner, Director HOK/DJH:de HENNEPIN COUNTY cc LUther Nelson an equal opportunity employer Denni s Hansen CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota June 30, 1980 TO: FROM: RE.' City Manager City Planner Mound Bay Park Lawcon APplication Please be advised that our Mound Bay Park Lawcon application recently received its metro ranking of 5 out of 15 submitted. The ranking appears to be within funding potential. Application funding is pre- dicated on the federal budget now froze by the Carter administration in terms of total amount coming from Washington. We will know final disposition in the fall. Our original application was scaled back by d~leting the boat parking/ramp project for DNR funding. Chuck Riesenberg