Loading...
80-12-02 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota AGENDA CM 80-386 CM 80-388 CM 80-391 CM 80-394 CM 80-392 CM 80-393 CM 80-385 CM 80-389 CM 80-390 CM 80-387 Mound City Council Meetin§ December 2, 1980 City Hall 7:30 P.M. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16. Minutes Pg. 2655-2659 Park Commission Minutes Pg. 2651-2654 Street Construction A. Retaining Wall Pg. 2649-2650 B. Other Application for Taxi Cab License Pg. 2644-2648 Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (2 Minute Limit) Transfer of Cemetery Lots Pg. 2643 Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 18, Block 22, Wychwood Pg. 2642 Vacation - Unnamed Street from Denbigh Road to Stratford Lane between Blocks 2 and 3, Avalon Pg. 2637-2641 Delinquent Utility Bills Pg. 2635-2636 Sewer Advisory Board Pg. 2632-2634 Police - Severance Pay Pg. 2631 1981 Budget Pg. 2628-2630 Transfer of Funds Payment of Bills Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 2556-2627 Committee Reports Page 2660 Ii~EROFFICE M E I~IO TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Hanager Chief Charles Johnson Resignation December Please consider this notice as my resignation from the position of police chief for the City of Hound effective January 3, 1981. Respectful ly, , ~.~ .-. .~ bnJer bnarl-es ~onnson Hound Police Dept. BILLS .... DECEMBER 2, 1980 Air Comm 90.00 " " 53.99 Auto Con 72.63 Action Electric 1,295.00 John Arnott 35.00 Amer Cast Iron Pipe 503.69 AM Bruning ll.ll Ronald Bostrom 38.87 " " 5.99 Holly Bostrom 95.00 " " lOO.OO F.H. Bathke 13.20 Blackowiak & Sons 84.00 Central Warehousing 97.22 Central Landscaping 5,436.67 Cargill Salt 833.21 Century Laboratories 101.73 Diseased Tree Rebates(19) 1,464.O0 Don David Ins. 114.54 Dependable Services 30.00 Display Sales 150.00 Davies Water Equip 110.74 ELMarketing 242.00 Eager Beaver Tree Remov. 1,O16.OO Finley Bros. Enterprises 22,878.00 General Office Prod 128.89 Gopher Sign 233.66 Gross Industrial 78.60 Fire Engineering 12.00 Feed Rite Controls 75.58 Farmers Steel Co. 37.82 Hawkins Chemical 96.28 Hecksel Machine 85.00 Henn Co. Chiefs of PolicePTAC 60.00 Hudson Map 39.49 Wm. Hudson 5.78 " " 13.55 Internat! City Mgmt Assn 145.OO IBM 74.07 " 10.10 Island Park Skelly 40.00 Leonard Kopp 67.29 Long Lake Ford Tractor 28.35 Labelmaster 6.20 League of Human Rights 48.75 City of Minnetrista 66.00 Wm Mueller & Sons 2,881.O8 MN UC Fund 71.77 Mutual Benefit Life 828.30 Metro Fone Commun. 35.40 MN Rescue & First Aid 15.OO Minnesota Fire Inc 33.67 Midwest E~ctric Miller/Davis Mound Postmaster Mary Marske Mound Police Metro Waste Control Mary Marske Mtka Appliance McCombs Knutson Mound Postmaster Navarre Hdwe NaP No~ Star Waterworks Northland Elec. Supply Pitney Bowes Reo Raj Kennels Soil Testing Serv. Shepherds Laundry Greg Skinner Robt Shanley Thurk Bros. Chev Tonka Tree Tri State Drilling Thompson Lumber Marina OK Hdwe Van Waters & Rogers Univ of MN Water Products Widmer Bros. Westonka Sanitation Westonka Community Serv Widmer Bros. Westonka Sanitation Xerox TOTAL BILLS TRANSFERS Police to Imp & Equip Outlay Street " " ii Park " " " Fi nance" ii ii Elections " " Diseased trees " Sewer " " " Water " " " Street to Shop & Stores Sewer " " " Water " ii ii Parks " " " Bldg Inspect." " Police " " " Liquor to General 50.23 88.25 100.00 23.76 14,864.34 32.28 279.76 48,801.OO 72.54 8O.57 3,113.35 214.12 66.10 45.OO 344.00 1,425.75 47.40 5.7O 59.66 31.39 225.00 6OO.44 98.80 6.45 661.80 6O.OO 456.90 4,901.70 4,175.OO 6,327.95 3,292.75 45.OO 586.77 131,349.95 2,505.83 2,500.00 333.33 66.66 25.00 35.00 5OO.OO 416.66 212.33 12.03 170.40 301.18 95.41 785.O9 1,500.OO CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota 12-2-80 December l, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-395 SUBJECT: Street Construction and Addendum to CM 80-388 Attached are copies of two letters from the Engineer. 1. Relative to CM 80-388 (Pages 2649 & 2650) on the retaining wall for the resident at 5955 Hillcrest Road, and Relative to an easement for construction of Waterbury Road east of Tuxedo Boulevard adjacent to Lots 1-8, Block 20, Whipple. v /ILeonard L. Kopp ~ ~ ~/~ McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS B LAND SURVEYORS ~ StTE ?LANNERS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 November 26, 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Subject: City of Mound 1980 Street Improvements Section 1 Wall Request Job #5248 Dear Mr. Kopp, Mrs. Schwartz at 5955 Hillcrest Road has requested a re- taining wall in front of the occupied portion of her property (not in front of the vacant lot). This street has a 40 foot right of way with 6 feet of right of way behind the curb. There is about a 2 to 2-1/2 foot bank at present behind the curb. There are no trees within 20 feet of the curb. We do not recommend a wall at this location. This property can be slope~ and sodded so that there will be no problem mowing the lawn. We will have pictures of the site at Tuesdays Council Meeting. We estimate the cost of the wall requested by Mrs. Schwartz at $560.00. Very truly yours, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Lyt~ Swanson, P.E. LS:ch Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls printed on recycled paper McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ~ LAND SURVEYORS · SITE PLANNEFIS Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 November 25, 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota Subject: City of Mound 1980 Street Improvements - Section 2 Easement 3ob #5248 Dear Mr. Kopp: We have met several times with Mr. and Mrs. Miller who own Lots 1 to 8 and Lots 17 to 23, Block 20, Whipple located on the end of Waterbury, East of Tuxedo. These lots are two potential buildlng sltes with one existing house. An easement from the Miller's is required to construct the 28 foot wide street requested by the majority of the people on this block and ordered by the City Council. The Miller's will grant the temporary easement to the City if the following things are done on their property. 1) Construct a wall to extend the off street parking area and a side wall to hold up the side of the off street parking area. Estimated Cost - $3,600. 2) Transplant some smaller trees from the area east of the house which has to be filled to accomodate the wiOening of the street and plant nursery shrubs on this slope. Estimated Cost - $500. Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls Mr. Kopp November 25, 1980 Page Two It is our recommendation, based on what the City has done in the past in similar situations that this offer not be accepted. There have been many cases where an off street parklng area has been eliminated by wldening streets in the past, when the property owners have received no compensation for granting the Clty an easement. The area where the trees are to be transplanted and the nursery shrubs planted is in an area where many of these would have to be removed if a 2nd house were ever bullt on the site. We feel the requests made are excessive in comparison with the potential damage or loss of value to the property from the proposed street construction. Yours very truly, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. L'~l~e'Swanson, P.E. LS:31 ,,1, (. 71 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mouna, M~nnesota December l, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-396 SUBJECT: Preliminary Report - Pecan Lane The Council asked for a report on the improvement of Pecan Lane from Rosedale to the railroad. Attached is the report. This is the area where it was requested for part of Pecan to be used for parking. La7o McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. I~ONSULTIN(~ EN{~INE[I::I~ · LAND ~URVEYOFI~ f ~ITE PLANNEf~ Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minn¢.~ta 55441 (61:2) 559-3700 Novemoer 25, 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota Suoject: City of Mound Pecan Lane Job #5248 Dear Mr. Kopp: The Council has ordered a Preliminary Engineering Report on Improvements on Pecan Lane from Rosedate Road to the railroad right-of-way. The owner of the property at the corner of Edgewater, Pecan and Rosedale has requested some improvements on Pecan to provide off street parking for his second car. Pecan Lane nas a 20 foot right-of-way and presently nas a driveway on the right-of-way serving one house. Two properties front on the street, the second property has a driveway off Rosedale and has indicated that ne might De interested in some day looping the driveway through to Pecan. The City nas been plowing this street to the eno. There are alternative methods of providing an additional parking space on Pecan. 1) Do nothing, but grant a variance for parking oq the end of Pecan Lane past the existing driveway. This will inconvenience the City in snow plowing operations, however, the puOlic works director nas indicated he could live with t~is. Cost: - Nothing. Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Fails Mr. Leonard Kopp NovemOer 25, 1980 Page Two 2) Construct a 16 foot wide blacktop drive on the right-of-way without curb and gutter and extend the drive far enough to allow the property owner on the east to loop his driveway in the future and still provide a parking space beyond his drive. The inconvenience in snow plowing would still be problem and a variance for on-street parking would still be required. Estimated Cost - $1,900. 3) Construct an 18 foot wide street'witn concrete curb and gutter. involves construction of retaining walls, removal of trees, and getting easements for the construction. This would ease the snowplowing problem somewhat. This Estimated Cost - $4,200. Anotner possibility that has been suggested is to construct the street as in Alternative 1, 2, or 3 and to designate the end of the street as a parking area and by a lease or permit arrangement assign one or two spaces to residents iq the area. We feel that this would set a precedent that could cause problems for the City in the future. There are many dead end streets in the City where the ends of the street could Oe used for parking in the same manner, and if many of these were designated as parking areas the snow plowing problems could be significant. It is our recommendation that Alternative i or 2 be adopted. We do not think it is realistic to provide concrete curb and gutter on a dead end street serving only one property. If you have any questions on this, we will be pleased to discuss this with you at your convenience. Yours very truly, McCOMBS-KNOTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. Ly]:e Swanson, P.E. LS:J1 SCALE ~[~.:~:~i~?~ OMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 158 ~1 /_~, 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 1, 1980 IIIFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-93 SUBJECT: Diseased Tree Payment - List # 14 Attached is a copy of a list of payments due property owners for removing diseased trees. These items will appear for payment on the list of bills. cc: City Clerk CITY OF Mound, ~innesota REBATE LIST #14 N~ME ADDRESS TOTAL NO. TREES DBH DOLLARS. William Bame 5054 Bartlett Blvd. 2 50" $100.00 Fitzclarence Cooper 2137 Noble 43" $86.00 Jerry Itall 4766 Aberdeen 39:' $ 78.00 Daryl Nelson 2177 Apple Lane 28" $56.00 Riley Harrison 6709 t~lstead Ave. 21" $42.00 Don Chemberlin 4841 Island View Dr. 53" $106.00 Phil Weiland 5544 Spruce Rd. 34" $68.00 Frank Moriarity 3031 Highland Blvd. 2 52" $104.00 ' Mike Savage 3125 Highland Blvd. 1 50" $100.00 John Heitkamp 5038 Woodland Rd. 1 22" $44.00 V. N. Jenson Rt. 1, Box 9 New Prague, Mn. 56071 29" $58.OO Gene Tolzman 4811 Hanover Rd. 16" $32.00 Bob Kratt 9118 Island View Dr. 81" $162.00 Itarry Scheibe 2045 Arbor Ln. 53" $106.00 Susan Jenn 4738 Galway 33 43" $86.00 Wilson Builders Inc. 15460 Edgewood Court Eden Prairie, Mn. 55343 23" $46.00 00' P9P'I$ ,,6I 'PE ;~AOU~H V06P u!~S qo~ oo'vot~ 'PM ~Aoa~InS gPg~ u~n~{ IIq4 I uosdmoq% 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota December 1, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-94 SUBJECT: Refund of Building Permit Fee Attached is a copy of a letter received requesting the refund of fees paid for a building permit on which the applicant was unable to get a mortgage commitment. They paid: $110.OO 761.75 190.OO $1,061.75 Park Dedication Fee (Woodcrest) Building Permit # 5481 Water Connection & Tapping Fee A fee of $50.00 should be retained for work already done in connec- tion with this building permit. It is thought that the Park Dedi- cation Fee should also be retained since it goes with the purchase of the land. Does the Council wish to refund the $110. Park Dedi- cation Fee? Refund would be $901.75. or $1,Oll.75 if Park Dedication fee in- cluded. cc: City Clerk Richard Baanrud BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF MOUND 5341 Maywood Rd., Mound, Min ~ta 5481, TELEPHONE NO. l{ 7:)' ~ 9C ~- TELEPHONE NO. ADDRESS , ZIP LOCATION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT STREET ADDRESS_ I I/- ADDITION LOT COMPLETION DATE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Survey .[P~Energy Comp. Plat Plan [E'Elevations Structural Plan ~. -Watershed ESTIMATED VALUE '-~, '~' 0 0 ZONING PID# ~ 3 -//'7 ' O q g. THIS BUII.DIN~ WILL NOT BE RENTED, SOLD TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION 1~ Single Family~ t. - oc ~ Sq. Ft. [] Multi-Family - Sq. Ft. [] Commercial Sq. Ft [] Industrial Sq. Ft. ~ Garage- Size Dq ,~ -~(-. Sq. Ft. [-~ Deck - Size Sq. Ft [] Patio - Size Sq. Ft, [] Fence - Size Ln. F PERMIT FEE $ ~ O .~' ¢ PLAN CHECK FEE $ ] 0 ,~..S SURCHARGE ~ q. -) S.A.C. ~'/~ '$. O~ WATER CONN. FEE $ I ~) ~ O0 -TAPPING FEE ~$ ~ .5'. E .~CAVA~ION FEE $ TOTAL $ ' <'] "J'/' 1980 R~fin~I. ~,~-~x:S~F~ , . Utility Bldg. - Size Sq. Ft. Council Resolution No PERMIT APPROVAL FINAL INSPECTION DATE DATE OCCUPANCY CERTIFICATE DATE ~'~MBING PERMIT NEEDED: ~ Z~ In case permit is granted, I hereby agree to do the proposed work in accordance with description above set forth and according to the provisions of all ordinances of the City of Mound and of all statutes of the State of Minnesota in such casesDATEmade andq/l~O/pr°vided'f~..~All building permitSAPPLiCANTexpire one ~.year after date~~~jof issuance. 't REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL November 12, 1980 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road in said City on November 12, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. Those present were: Mayor Tim Lovaasen, Councilmember Gordon Swenson, Robert Polston and Donald Ulrick. Councilmember Withhart was absent and excused. Also present were City Manager Leonard L. Kopp, City Engineer Wm. McCombs and City Clerk Mary H. Marske. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting of November 5, 1980 were presented for consideration. Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of November 5, 1980 as submitted. The vote was unanimously in favor. PUBLIC HEARING - VACATION OF CAVAN ROAD FROM TYRONE TO CLARE The City Clerk presented an affidavit of publication in the official newspaper of the notice of public hearing on said Vacation of Cavan Road from Tyrone to Clare. Said affidavit was then examined, approved and ordered filed in the office of the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the public hearing for input on said Vacation of Cavan Road from Tyrone to Clare and persons present to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. No persons presented objections and the Mayor then closed the public hearing. Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-416 RESOLUTION VACATING CAVAN ROAD FROM TYRONE TO CLARE The vote was unanimously in favor. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Subdivision of Land - Lots 3 & 4, Block 3, Shadywood Point Polston moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-417 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 3 & 4, Block 3, SHADYWOOD POINT The vote was unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land - Lots 1 & 2, Block 3, Avalon Polston moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION TO GRANT THE SUBDIVISION WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THE GARAGE BE REMOVED Ulrick moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion to table this item. The vote was unanimously in favor. Street Front Variance - Lots 2, 3 & 4, Block 13, Devon Lovaasen moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-418 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A STREET FRONT VARIANCE FOR LOTS 2, 3 & 4, BLOCK 13, DEVON The vote was unanimou~y in favor. Nonconforming Use - Lot 4, Block 19, Shadywood Point Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-419 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE NONCONFORM- ING USE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 19, SHADYWOOD POINT The vote was unanimously in favor. Rezoning - Lots 8, 9, 14 & 15, Block 2, Dreamwood Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-420 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE REZONING OF LOTS 8, 9, 14 & 15, BLOCK 2, DREAMWOOD TO BE HEARD DECEMBER 9, 1980 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-421 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR LOTS 8, 9, 14 & 15, BLOCK 2, DREAMWOOD TO BE HEARD DECEMBER 9, 1980 AT 7:30 P.M. The vote was unanimously in favor. Street Front and Lot Size Variance Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-422 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WITH THE ADDED STIPULATION THAT A TURN AROUND APPROACH BE MANDATORY The vote was unanimously in favor. Subdivision of Land - Lots 20, 21 & p/17, 18 & 19, Block 6, Pembroke Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-423 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND OF LOTS 20, 21 & P/17, 18 & 19, BLOCK 6, PEMBROKE The vote was unanimously in favor. SOFTBALL FIELD Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion to request Councilmember Polston attend meetings regarding possible development of a Joint Powers Agreement with the school district and Minnetrista regarding softball fields. The vote was unanimsouly in favor. PARK COMMISSION MINUTES Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-424 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF PARK COMMISSION THAT SNOWMOBILING BE BARRED BETWEEN 5044 AND 5050 EDGEWATER BY USE OF RESTRICTIVE SIGNS 135 The vote was unanimo in favor. STREET ASSESSMENTS No action was taken on this matter. STREET CONSTRUCTION Right of Way Problems at Tuxedo and Piper Ulrick moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-425 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ENGINEER TO MOVE THE CONSTRUCTION OF TUXEDO AND PIPER AS RECOMMENDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST The vote was unanimously in favor. Parking on Rosedale Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-426 RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT THERE IS NO PUBLIC NEED FOR 20 FEET OF LOT 25, SKARP AND LINDQUIST'S GLEN ARBOR AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TORE- QUEST THE STATE TO SELL THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY FOR RESALE TO THE PROPERTY OWNER AT 5023 EDGEWATER The vote was unanimously in favor. Ulrick moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion to request a report from the staff regarding a leased parking area on Pecan. The vote was three in favor with Polston voting nay. Tuxedo Blvd. and Three Points Blvd. Lovaasen moved and Polston seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-427 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ENGINEER TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TUXEDO BLVD. AND THREE POINTS BLVD. TO BE OPENED JANUARY 9, 1981 The vote was unanimously 'in favor. COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT Patrick Furlong commented on street construction in his neighborhood. C.B.D. SNOW PLOWING Ulrick moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-428 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE C.B.D. SNOW PLOWING CONTRACT TO THE LOW AND ONLY BIDDER - ILLIES AND SONS The vote was unanimously in favor. BASS TOURNAMENTS - 1981 Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-429 RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE MINNETONKA BASS CLUB REQUEST FOR A TOURNMENT ON JUNE 6, 1981 AND JUNE 13, 1981 The vote was unanimously in favor. TAX FORFEIT LAND - , BLOCK 3, A.L. CROCKERS 1ST~DDITION /ovaasen moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION B0-430 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND HANAGER TO REQUEST THE STATE RELEASE LOT 44, BLOCK 3, A.L. CROCKERS 1ST ADDITION FOR RESALE TO THE OWNER OF ADJOINING PROPERTY The vote was unanimously in favor. DEFERRED ASSESSMENTS AND H.U.D. GRANT Lovaasen moved and Ulrick seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-431 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 79-361 TO IN- CLUDE HANDICAPPED RESIDENTS AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL GUIDELINES IN THE ELIGIBILITY CLASS- IFICATION OF THE H.U.Do GRANT POLICY The vote was three in favor with Polston voting nay. Swenson moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-432 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE STAFF TO SUBMIT WARRANT REQUESTS TO HENNEPIN COUNTY TO PAY ASSESSMENTS ON ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS OF THE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM The vote was unanimously in favor. POLICE UNION CONTRACT Lovaasen moved and Swenson seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-433 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LABOR AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 The vote was unanimously in favor. THOMAS AND SONS CASE The City Attorney advised the Council of the status of the arbitration case with Thomas and Sons. PAYMENT OF BILLS Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as presented on the prelist in the amount of $810,952.43 when funds are available. Roll call vote was unanimously in favor. 1981 BUDGET Polston moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion RESOLUTION 80-434 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1981 BUDGET AS AMENDED BY THE COUNCIL The vote was three in favor with Swenson voting nay, THANKSGIVING BREAK Polston moved and Lovaasen seconded a motion to close the City offices on November 28, 1980 and allow half the office staff December 26, 19~0 ms a day o~ and t~e other half of the office staff January 2, 1981 as a day off. The vote was unanimously in favor. ADJOURNMENT Lovaa'sen moved and Polston seconded a motion to adjourn to the next regular meet- ing on December 2, 1980 at 7:30 p.m. The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned. Mary H. Marske CMC, City Clerk/Treasurer Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 18, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-386 SUBJECT: Park Commission Minutes Attached is a copy of the Park Commission minutes. The Park Commission has reviewed the dock location map and have made the following recommendations which must be acted on by January 15th: 1. 1551 Bluebird - Recommended the Classification remain "Class A" and the applicant apply for a special permit. 2. Dock Site 23325 - Arbor Lane The Park Commission recommended the area be reduced to one dock site and allow the permit to remain with Swanson. 5149 Woodland Road - Request to open dock site in Lagoon at the end of Block 8 in Jenning's Bay; now classified as "Class A" - Wild Life Area. The Park Commission recommended that, "Deny any land change classification from a wild life area--dock would have to extend across too much marsh land, not practical". Dock Site 13660-13690 Spacing Docks to allow for swimming. The recommendation - "Grant approval of dock spacing for holders of Per- mit Numbers 13660 - 13690 for 1981 season". L. Kopp ~ / / cc: Public Works MINUTES OF MOUND ADVISORY PARK COMMISSION MEETING November 13, 1980 Present: Hal Larson, Jon Lynott, Toni Case, Cathy Bailey, Staff represented by Chris Bollis and Donald Rother, citizens present Kermit Sherman, Wallace Smith and Douglas Smith and secretary D. De Laney. Meeting was called to order by Chairman Larson. Minutes of October 9th meeting were presented for approval. Motion by Larson seconded by Bailey to accept the minutes as presented. Unanimously approved. Dock Location items and citizen requests were allowed to preceed order of scheduled business. (1) George Gerberding of 1551 Bluebird Lane, Lots part of 3-4-5 & 32, Block 6, Woodland Point, had requested a classification change in dock location map from present "A" classification, this is located between Wawonassa and Waurika Commons. Bailey's memory dredged up action taken in 1975-76 meeting whereby it would take a Special Permit for a dock in this area. Considerable discussion between members and dock inspector on procedure and circumstances surround this. MOTION by Bailey seconded by Case, "Shoreline classified as Class "A" at this point and a Special Permit for dock in this area would have to be applied for by resident or home- owner living there." Unanimously approved. (2) Douglas Swanson of 2142 Sandy Lane, dock site 23325 on Arbor Lane. Rother explained that Doug previously had dock at wrong angle, he has attempted to correct dock angle but unable to comply with LMCD's rule due to limited foot- age for docking. Previously this area had been reduced from 3'dock'sI:tes to 2 dock sites but even that will not accommodate two boats. MOTION by Bailey seconded by Case, "Eliminate one dock site, allowing site 23335 to remain with Swanson having priority on dock permit application." Unanimously approved. (3) Paul Hanssen of 5149 Woodland Point, Lots 22-23 & 24, Block 8, Woodland Point. Repeated appearances before Commission with request to install dock out into lagoon at end of Block 8 in Jennings Bay. Considerable discussion by Commissi.on, this area classified Class "AU and a wildlife area with length of dock being prohibitive to reach water. Most of area is marsh land with very low water level during normal years. MOTION by Larson seconded by Bailey, "Deny any land change classification from a wild life area, dock would have to extend across too much marsh land, not practical." Unanimously approved. (4) Anticipating annual request by Merlin, dock site 13660 and Woytcke, dock site 13690, for approval of dock spacing to allow space for swiming that must be renewed annually. MOTION by Larson seconded by Lynott, "Grant approval of dock spacing for holders of dock site permit No. 13660 and 13690 for the 1981 season." Unanimously approved. (5) k~Sherman~ of 5065 Wren Road, Lot 10 Block 1, Linden Heights and Walter Smith o---f~5053 Wren Road, Lot 8, Block 1, Linden Heights came before MINUTES OP MOUND ADVlly PARK COMMISSION MEETING - N~ 13, 1980 page two the Commission with a request to have the City owned property, Lot 9, Block 1, Linden Heights, that has a drainage ditch runnin9 through it~ to be fixed up. Picture o~ aerial view showed lots and how drainage was eroding shoreline. They explained how they are having their lots riprapped, with Lots 7 and 8 already having approval Df Watershed District and Lot 10 in process of obtain- ing approval. With new ruling having drainage set far back into lots to elim- inate polution from runoff, it makes for an unattractive approach to lake. Chris told how he had made an unofficial inspection of this area after the 1979 street project had been completed and the drainage ditch repaired. Chris was dissatisfied with the work after the sodding had been done but the contractor had been fired frOm the job and we are looking for recourse to have some of this work redone correctly. MOTION by Larson seconded by Bailey, "Park Director follow through on repair of drain- age ditch so that erosion of shoreline on City owned Lot 9, off Wren Road, is done correctly." Unanimously approved. (6) Litigation on the status of A1 & Alma's dock was questioned. Rother stated that the dock is now out of the water, Mr. Nolan has promised to come up with a plan next Spring that will meet requirements of City, si it is now dormant until he applies for license next year. (7) Larson expressed hope there would be some tangible expression from attorney on progress of ordinance regarding NO BOUYS/MOORING$ for sailboats on Commons before Spring, when permits will be coming in for this type of permit. City Manager's Report - None, Kopp at retirement banquent for Mound Policemen. Council Rep. Report - None, Lovaasen absent Planning Comm. Report - None, Jackson absent Park Director's Report - Chris informed the Commission that the playground equipment had been installed at Island Park Park and Three Points Park. The tennis court at Island Park is complete except for the striping. Council has approved the blacktopping of the parking lot by the tennis court for Island Park. Highland Park has been filled after the drainage had been put in. Have laid out skating rinks with grade for flood- ing. Brookton Park has been filled and leveled and will be seeded this year, equip- ment will be reinstalled next year. There is the possibility that this park may be used for skating this year. Sign has been installed at Mound Bay Park, and they have moved it towards the depot building. Tyrone Park, where they have the warming house, and lighted area for activities, had the light switch control box vandalized. The lights can be turned on manually now by the youngsters but they seem to utilize the the area and turn off the lights most of the time after playing. Have ~equested the police to turn off lights if no one is using the field late at night and they are burn- ing, in the course of their patrolling. Official skating rinks for the 1980-81 season will be Island Park Park, Three Points Park, Tyrone Park, with supervised warming house, if budget permits this funding, and Highland and Brookton if possible. 'There will be no berms surrounding the rinks and they will cover a much larger area for skating. Handicapped access has been built at both the Depot building and Island Park Hall, these are wheel chair ramps. Chris announced he will be attending the Minnesota Recreation & Park Association , "Designing for the 80's" meeting November 19, 20 and 21st at the Thunderbird Motel in Bloomington. Recreation Committee Report - Bailey stated that members of the Softball Committee are to meet with the Park Commission. Cathy will write a letter to Ulrick informing MINUTES OF MOUND ADVI~ ~Y PARK COMMISSION MEETING - 13, 1980 page three him of this so that they will be at the January Discussion Meeting at 7:30 p.m., this will be the only meeting scheduled. Long Range Planning - Larson is still waiting for a report from the City Planner before anything can be done on this. Trails Committee Report - Lynott had nothing to report. Bailey expressed disappointment and concern that Minnetrista had returned unused funds and these could have been used for expansion of the trails in previous years and they had maintained there was no money available. Motion by Larson seconded by Lynott to adjourn until the next scheduled meeting of December 11th. djd Note: No Discussion meetings in November or December, both falling on holidays. To clarify Park Director"s Report of 10-9-80, a request had been received to improve the shoreline area of Carlson Park, Chris stated there was a possibility this area could be leveled but it is used for a docking area only, it is not recommended to improve this area beyond grading and/or leveling of land. 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 24, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-388 SUBJECT: Street Construction - Retaining Wall Attached is a copy of a letter from the resident at 5955 Hillcrest asking for a retaining wall. The Engineers will be at the December 2 meeting with information on this property. '-~ I~eonard L. Kopp 12-2-80 CITY OF M0~N0 Mound, Minnesota November 24, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-391 SUBJECT: Application for Taxi Cab License Attached is a copy of an application for a taxi cab license. The applicant will buy a new car if he gets a license and says that he has contracted for taxicab insurance. This will be on the December 2, 1980 agenda. Attached is a copy of the report from the Police Department. CITY OF MOUND .... '" ° 'Annual Fee $15.O0 ist Veh. 5341Maywood Road' 10.00 Others Mound, MN. 55364 Payable~with Application. TAXICAB LICENSE APPLICATION Name ~',a ,Q-q- _~ c_, ~ ~ C~, L~ ~i-~f~_ Date of Application Address, 5OO% Class of Vehicle Caz-z-ying Capacity Length of time vehicle has been in use Make of Car~ o ~ ~ ~ ~-z~~ ~ Engine No. Is above car mortgaged? ..~0 Name of Mortgagee Amonnt of Mortgage. License Serial.No. Holder of Legal Title Is Vehicle Leased Licensed Or. under any form of contract per- mitted to be used and operated by some other person than the one holding legal.title thereto? What person, firm or corporation collects the revenues from operation of above cab? What person, firm or corporation pays the .expenses of operating above cab? Proposed Fare Schedules:_ ~.-b cL .,. .(~ s of Service: This is a true and correct statement to the best of m~ knowledge. Subscribed and sworn to before me this Applicant I TEROFFICE M E TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Leonard Kopp - City Manager Sgt. William Hudson Carl Julian Glister's preliminary taxi application November 25, The applicant, on 11-28-80, applied for and received a Minnesota drivers license. The applicant, as of ll-25-80, has no wants or warrants, nor does he have an outstandi~/~ving record. Attachg~ is a coj~y~of hi~ driving license and his application. 'sp tfully "~ . William Hudso~/~._.) / ~und Police Department IH/sh ~nc. 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 25, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-394 SUBJECT: Transfer of Cemetery Lots The family of Reverend and Mrs. Obert Voll (deceased) wish to transfer by sale Graves 7 and 8 in Lot 46, Section A, of the Cemetery. The transfer is to be made to Mrs. Kimball Hodge, a long time resident of Mound. Section 5.035 of the Cemetery Ordinance requires Council approval of transfers. It is recommended this transfer be authorized. ~Le6nard L. Kopp cc: Steven R. Cray 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 24, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-392 SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land - Lot 18, Block 22, Wychwood The people living next to the subject lot have requested to purchase the lot at private sale so they can add it to their lot. The cost of the lot is $2,310.00 plus the street assessment which is $828.80. The cost of the lot is as follows: County Price $2,000. State Tax 60. City costs 250. $2,310. It is recommended the purchase and resale of the lot be authorized. cc: Mr. & Mrs. Afshar 12-2-80 CITY OF M0~N0 Mound, Minnesota November 25, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-393 SUBJECT: Vacation - Unnamed Street from Denbigh Road to Stratford Lane between Blocks 2 and 3, Avalon The City Council suggested that the subject street be vacated rather than keep the house On Lot 1, Block 3, as a non-conforming use. Attached is a copy of a letter showing how the utilities, etc. feel about the vacation. The Planning Commission recommended as follows: Smith moved and Paulsen seconded a motion to recommend vacating the 15 foot wide unnamed street between Blocks 2 and 3, Avalon, with the stipulation that a permanent easement for storm sewer purposes be retained on the entire right-of-way. The vote was unanimously in favor. A date of January 13th is suggested for a public hearing. November 24, 1980 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Planning Commission The City Manager Vacation of Unnamed Street between Blocks 2 & 3, Avalon The Council has suggested that the unnamed street between Blocks 2 and 3, Avalon, be studied to determine whether or not it should be vacated. The utilities companies, etc. have responded as follows: Minnegasco - "No facilities within the above described area and Minne- gasco has no objection". N.S.P. - "We see no need for that unnamed street" Continental Telephone - "We have no facilities on this right-of-way and do not see any future needs". Fire Department - "No need" Public Works - "Feel that vacation of unnamed street between blocks 2 & 3, Avalon, would be unnecessary. We need the com- plete 15 feet for storm sewer easement that is already installed" Engineer - "A storm sewer was constructed on the unnamed street between Blocks 2 and 3, Avalon as part of the 1978 Street Improvements. The only other potential use for the street would be as a walking path to the lake. If the street is to be vacated, a permanent easement for storm sewer purposes should be main- tained on the entire right-of-way." '-~ ~Oeonard L. Kopp ! ' LLK/ms o ::_" - 00 LAN£ ~", Sec. 22.03-a Location and complete legal descriplion o[ proper~ ~o be divided: Lots ] & 2 Block 3 Avalon Lot ] divided fro~ Lot 2 ~ W~IVE~ I~ LOT SIZE IS ~E~UESTED FO~: New Lo~ No. From 7:30 P M City Hall ~TION FOR SUBDIVISION VILLAGE OF MOUND Must be AND FEE $ PLAT 37850 present. PARCEL 0480 19-117-23'24 0012 ZONING A-2 Block 3 Avalon (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) 25,00 Square feet TO Square feel /, XII I-1 1- 1 //- - / {signatUre) · ! OC]'-- ~1 J~,canl~ i[[erest in the property: Fee owner ~/~ - ' ::F~ o F ~ 0 u NgJ a..,ication must be signed by all the OWNERS of the p{~e~, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: vote. A motion to deny subdivision failed by a 4 to 3 · D~TE '.0ct~ 2.7,.1980-.:~7~,.~ o : ]to:. :-.-rk::r set '.~ 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 25, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-385 SUBJECT: Delinquent Utility Bills Attached is a list of past due water and sewer accounts. These accounts are over six months past due and should be turned off for non-payment. In order to turn off the water, the Council should hold a public hearing. A suggested date for the public hearing would be Decem- ber 16. Leonard L. Kopp 11-25-80 Account # 11-013-1689-91 11-O16-1665-21 11-016-1721-31 11-016-1736-11 11-019-1598-91 11-O19-1723-31 11-022-1562~91 11-O25-1617-21 11-O31-1617-21 11-046-1760-11 11-052-5001-11 11-O55-5037-71 11-O67-1761-21 11-O67-1801-61 11-073-4716-11 11-O85-4960-91 11-103-5984-91 11-112-5912-11 11-112-5917-O1 11-112-5966-71 11-154-2221-21 11-166-2257-O1 11-169-5700-00 11-169-6256-21 11-187-5444-71 11-193-2146-91 11-196-2138-91 42-343-2650-41 42-343-2631-41 Delinquent (Over six Total Utility Bills months old) Amount $40.21 79.84 53.19 95.88 64.56 310.14 78.24 44.94 83.94 121.31 86.23 148.24 52.8O 78.33 62.34 65.54 62.56 39.90 77.29 118.18 44.94 61.44 52.74 79.29 116.52 104.40 40.52 888.44 178.26 $3330.21 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Hound, M|nnesota November 24, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-389 SUBJECT: Sewer Advisory Board Attached is a copy of a letter from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission requesting a representative be appointed to a Sewer Advisory Board for Area # 4. It is suggested that this nomination be made in January at the organizational meeting. ]50 mETRO/OUIqRE BLDG. 7TH & ROBERTITREET! /[tinT PFIUL mn 55101 619/999.8493 November 21, 1980 The Honorable Tim Lovaasen Mayor of F bund 5341MaywoodRoad Mound, ~X~ 55364 Dear Sir: The Metropolitan Waste Control Ccma~ission is desirous of in~.roving and expanding its ~cations with the over 100 local units of government it serves in the seven county metropolitan area. When the Metropolitan Sewer Act was enacted by the legislature over a decade ago, it provided for the establishment of Sewer Service Area Advisory Boards (SSAAB) for the purposes of reviewing, ccm~P_n ~ting and advising the C~ssion on its ~arious activities. The Cc~mission would like to re-activate these service area advisory boards, therefore we would like to suggest that you and your council appoint a me~f~_r of the council or an employee to serve on this Advisory Board. The reSpOnsibilities of the Advisory Board w~uld be to review and ccmment on such matters as the cost allocation system, operating budgets, capital improvement programs, air/water ?~ality standards, future wastewater st:-ma~rds ~ related operating and capital costs, and other such matters that would re~re review and ccx~_nt. In addition, many of the problems and misunderstandings that occur frc~n time to t/me may be better handled in this process. We would appreciate it very much if your appointment can be made by January 10, 1981. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Anthony C. Gnerre at 222-8423. This suggested procedures is not intended to be a formal organization with decision making or policy powers, for that would be contrary to the laws of the State which impose upon the Ccmmission th~qe responsibilities. Ra~-her, tills is an effort to gain the advice and knowledge of the o~ttttGnities and to share with the communities facts and expertise available to the Cc~ssion in as expeditious a w~y as possible. Your cooperation on this rotter will be greatly appreciated and should provide a greater opportunity to serve t.he people of this region in a more productive and efficient manner. Attached is a schedule identifying c<~,~nities within each service area. Because of the variations in size, each SSAAB my well set up different procedures and ~mccting schedules; we would hope that there would at least be s~ui-annual meetings by each. Very truly yours, SA:Dd cc. Commissioner representing service area ~IN SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 4 Chanb~$en Chaska Deephaven Eden Pr~ ~ tie Excelsior Laketown Twp. Long Lake Maple Plain Minnetonka Minnetonka Beach Minnetrista Prior Lake St. Bonifacius Savage Shakopee Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Victoria Waconia Wayzata 12-2-80 Nound, Hinnesota November 24, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-390 SUBJECT: Police - Severance Pay Under the Union Contract, patrolmen who leave after 36 months service get severance pay of 1/3 their unused sick leave. The two patrolmen being cut because of budget consideration have not been with the City 36 months, but have asked if the City will pay the severance pay. One patrolman has accumulated 152 hours sick leave which means he would get 48 hours pay; the other has 67 hours which means he would get 22.3 hours pay. It is recommended the Council pass a resolution authorizing Patrolmen Smith and Polley be paid severance pay even though they have not been with the City 36 months. 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 19, 1980 COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 80-387 SUBJECT: 1981 Budget Based on Council Memorandum No. 80-382, the Council authorized a budget of 10 1/3 Policemen and to use all Revenue Sharing Funds. In double checking, we found that I used the wrong column of figures on expenditures. I used $1,778,666; whereas after cutting the previ- ous, we should have used $1,721,425 for 10 policemen and $1,746,441 for 11 policemen. The budget would look like this: Income Less State's cut in funds Expenditures Difference $1,748,351. (-24,267.) $1,724,084. 1,746,441. (ll Policemen) $ (22,357.) If the $22,357 is taken from Revenue Sharing's $43,000, we would have $20,643 left in Revenue Sharing for Spring and Fall Pickup and other things. In 1980, we used $5,000 of this for summer recreation. 2, 1980 Councilmember moved the following resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 80 - RESOLUTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION 80-434 ADOPTING THE 1981 BUDGET AS AMENDED BY THE COUNCIL BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUND, MOUND, MINNESOTA: That the Council does hereby adopt the 1981 budget as amended whereby the Police budget will be $414,376 for 11 Policemen: GENERAL: Council $33,350. Manager 83,280. Finance 115,200. Inspection 31,805. Legal 20,500. Assessing 35,925. Election 355. Prosecutor 13,525. Planning 12,3OO. Human Rights 465. Contingency 20,000. Police 414,376. Fire 107,950. Fire Capital Outlay 227,000. Civil Defense 9,145. Streets 245,350. Parks 74,855. Shop & Stores 34,900. Diseased Trees 63,170. Pensions, PERA 97,382. Fire Relief 47,814. Assessments-City 22,645. Debt. Serv. Imp. Bonds 35,149. $1,746,441. SELF SUPPORTING: Water Sewer Cemetery Imp. Equip. Outlay Sewer Cap. Outlay Liquor Water Rev. Bonds Building Funds $235,698. 387,325. 3,800. 93,700. 50,628. 205,300. 36,068. 51,671. $1,'O64.190 Grand Total of $2,810,631. 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 25, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-92 SUBJECT: 1981 Metro Sewer Service Charges Attached are copies of calculations of Mound's 1981 charges to Metro Waste Control for Mound's sewer service. --Le~onard L. Kopp v · METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION STATEMENT OF 1981 SEWER SERVICE CHARGES 160 Mound .CURRENT USE CHARGES GALLONAGE % OF TOTAL AMOUNT TREATMENT WORKS COSTS SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 04 405 .004284 $ 193,638.15 405 .074751 80,037.61 TOTAL CHARGES 273,675.76 OTHER CREDITS OR CHARGES GURRENT VALUE CREDIT DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT 1979 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 1 O, 344. OOCR 46,801.00CR 36,683.81CR TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES TOTAL ANNUAL ESTIMATED NET PAYMENT DUE 93,828.81CR 179,846.95~ Due on the first day of each month. Installments not received by the 10th day of each month in which due shall be regarded as delinquent and shall bear interest from the first day of such month at the rate of 6% per annum. METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION FINAL COST ALLOCATION FOR BUDGET YEAR 1979 MILLION GALLONS AMOUNT CURRENT USE CHARGES: TREATMENT WORKS COSTS SEWER SERVICE AREA NO. 04 401 401 148,310.64 65,731.82 TOTAL CHARGES 214,042.46 OTHER'CREDITS OR CHARGES: CURRENT VALUE CREDIT DEBT PAYMENT CREDIT 1977 FINAL COST ALLOCATION 10,344.00CR 49,323.88CR 4,710.51CR TOTAL CREDITS OR CHARGES 64,378.39CR TOTAL ANNUAL ACTUAL CHARGES 149,664.07 1979 CASH PAYMENTS NET SURPLUS OR (DEFICIT) 186,347.88 36,683.81 ,- McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Reply To: 12800 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 (612) 559-3700 November 24, 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager City of Mound 5341Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota Subject: City of Mound Class Action Determination Dear Mr. Kopp: I am forwarding with a copy of this letter to Curt Pearson the notice of class action Oetermination of cement and cement containing products you sent to mB. It appears that if the class action is successful the City of Mound could be reimbursed for part of the cost of the concrete used in curb and gutter and storm sewer construction in the years 1968 through 1976. A quick reading of the notice seems to indicate that no action is required of Mound at this time, but Curt should verify this. Yours very truly, McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. Ly'i~ Swanson, P.E. LS:J1 Enclosure cc: Curt Pearson Minneapolis o Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls printed on recycled paper BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE A-2300 Gov~rnrn~n'l' Cen~'er Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 November 6, 1980 To all Municipalities and Other Involved Parties Concerning AB-1 Sub. No. 91 Chicago and North Western Transportation Company Abandonment of Rail Line Between Hopkins and Norwood, Minnesota: Enclosed is a copy of a telegram authorizing the extension of the public use negotiation period for the abandoned right-of- way of the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, Hopkins to Norwood line. It is my understanding that this extension is operative when interested parties have been notified. The Hennepin County Regional Railroad Aithority is working as quickly as possible to make an appropriate offer to the Chicago and North Western Transportation Company. As.< I .'~ Lee >ciate County Administrator AJL:cp cc: Interstate Commerce Commission To: Cities of Hopkins Minnetonka Deephaven Greenwood Excelsior Tonka Bay Shorewood Victoria Waconia Norwood Carver County Park Reserve, Victoria Carver County Auditor Attached list HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer November 7, 1980 notice tO municipalities and other parties involved re AB-1 Sub. No. 91 - Chicago and North Western Transportation Company abandonment of Rail line between Hopkins and Norwood, Minnesota: (in addition to those listed on the letter) Camille D. Andre Metropolitan Transit Commission 801 American Center Building St; Paul, MN 55101 David L. Bangasser 600 Rice Street Wayzata, MN 55391 Richard P. Braun, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation 411'Transpqrtation Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Frank Brixius 20225 Cottagewood Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Joe F. Neaton, Commissioner Carver County Courthouse 600 East 4th Street Chaska, MN 55318 E. E. Berglund 1000 Lumber Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 55401 Bureau of Intercity Railways Department of Transportation 300 N. State Street, Room 1010 Chicago, IL 60610 R. D. Darsie 350 North Robert Street ~--~' ~ St. Paul, ~'~5~-~ Fred A. Hardin 14600 Detroit Avenue Cleveland, Ohio 44107 Edward J. Hickey, Jr. 1125 15th street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 R. H. Koepke 205 E. Walnut St., Rm. 302 Green Bay, WI 54301 G. R. Maloney 414 S. JeffersOn St. Green Bay, WI 54301 C. M. McIntosh 400 1st St., N.W. WashingtOn, D.C. 20001 Robert T. Opal 400 West Madison St. Chicago, IL 60606 T. Q. Ryan 350 N. Robert St. St. Paul, MN 55101 U.S. Dept. of Interior Bureau of Outdoor Recreation Washington, D.C. 20240 U.S. Geological Survey 1934 Newton Square-East Reston, VA 22070 Dir. Richard J. Schiefelbein 1900 L St. N.W., 5th Fl. Washington, D.C. 20036 J. R. Snyder 400 1st St. N.W., Rm. 704 Washington, D.C. 20001 Ho---'ward M. Wilchins 955 L'Enfant Plaza SW Washington, D.C. 20595 G. Justen Williams 400 7th St. S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Thomas A. Woodley 1125 15th St. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Ghaieb Abdul-Rahman Metropolitan Council 300 Metro Square Building St. P~ul, MN '55101 MMAOSg{I040) (1-00~492I~0~00~-) PD 11/~14/80 10,5S TWX I~ WSH ~ COLLECT WASH DC NOV 4 ~ PMS MR A J LEE ASSOCIATED COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AND COUNTY ENGINEER BUREAU OF PUBLIC SERVICE A-2505 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487 RE: AB-I SUB NO 91 CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION 8F-1201 (IqLS-6g) COMPANY--ABANDONMENT BETWEEN HOPKINS AND NORWOOD, MN. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE PUBLIC USE NEGOTIATION PERIOD GRANTED UNTIL JANUARY 18, 1981, NOTIFY ALL PARTIES ,AND CONFIRM TO THIS COMMISSION. RICHARD A KELLY ACTING DEPUTY DIRECTOR 8F.1201 (~) SECTION OF FINANCE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION NNNN Washington D.C. 20472 Like everything else, progress brings change,. Last year, for ~ the Federal Insurance Administration's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) grew to 1.8 million policy holders with a total coverage of more than $80 billion in force. Last year, too, on April l, 1979, another important change took place. The Federal Insurance Administration (formerly a part of Housing and Urban Development) merged with four other federal agencies, and half a dozen program areas already in operation at the federal level, to create a single voice in the Federal Government for disaster and emergency-related programs. This merger established the Federal Emergency Management Agency which focuses on problems resulting from natural, man-made or any possible wartime disasters. This means that the information in your files on the National Flood Insurance Program is now outdated. We are providing you with the attached on the NFIP to keep you current on the program. Please purge your files of any materials which you have on hand pre-dating this Backgrounder. If you have any need for stories, background information or interviews on the National Flood Insurance Program, the Office of Public Affairs will be happy to cooperate. Call our office: 202/634-1600. loy, )k6J~ing Director of ~4u~'lic Affairs Attachment federal emergency management agency BACKGROUNDER 1725 I Street, N.W. / Washington, D.C. 20472 EDITOR'S NOTE: BACKGROUNDER ON NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM The risks involved in selling flood insurance to residents and business-owners in flood-prone communities is so great, without the ability to require the communities to adopt and enforce strong flood plain management measures, that long ago commercial insurance companies determined it would be financially disastrous for them to write flood insurance policies. As a result, year-after-year family-after-family found itself flooded out of its home, and the flood loss bill nationwide totaled in the billions of dollars. True, there was some help for flood victims. State and local assistance came to their aid. And, if the President declared a flood a major disaster, federal assistance became available. But, for many, this often meant carrying two mortgages and emptying their life savings. Often, the financial burden was too great for families to sustain. Yet, people continued building or rebuilding in flood-prone areas. Houses and businesses multiplied in these areas, ever increasing the threat of what a flood could do when it did arrive. The need for flood insurance has always been there. But the implementation of a program that could deliver this insurance to families and businesses at affordable rates was not to happen until 1968. Today that program, the National Flood Insurance Program, protects the homes or businesses of over 1.8 million policy holders, with a total coverage of over $80 billion. According to the Federal Insurance Administration, which administers the National Flood Insurance Program, the citizens of almost 17,000 communities across the country are eligible to buy flood insurance because their communities joined this Program by instituting flood plain management and hazard mitigation efforts. -2- The Federal Insurance Administration is a part of a new agency, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, created April 1, 1979, to give state and local organizations a single point of contact within the Federal structure when they needed help with any emergency-related situation, from natural disasters to man-made disasters, and including any possible wartime attack. FIA was transferred from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to the new agency, together with four other federal disaster assistance agencies and a half dozen program areas, to help accomplish FEMA's mission: develop programs and guidance that would help plan and prepare for, mitigate, respond to and recover from any possible emergency that might strike in any part of the United States. It was logical for the Federal Insurance Administration to leave the Department of Housing and Urban Development and become a part of FEMA, because of the strong emphasis this office puts on lessening the consequences of floods. FIA requires each community that joins the National Flood Insurance Program to institute, and enforce, strong flood plain management measures. In addition, FIA is concentrating many of its efforts on flood hazard mitigation. The Federal Insurance Administration, itself, is a young office, not quite 12 years old. HISTORY Interest in flood plain management has always been fickle: high when a flood has vented its damaging waters on a community; low when recovery efforts have been accomplished. The interest in a federally-subsidized flood insurance program for the United States, in fact, dates back to the Truman Administration. The late President's home state of Missouri suffers millions of dollars in flood-related damage each year, yet during his Administration a flood insurance program was not a reality. Three years later, in 1955, after Hurricane Diane struck and eight Atlantic and six Northeastern states experienced extensive storm-produced flooding, public demand for federal flood assistance surfaced again. This time, the first comprehensive flood insurance program was guided through the Congress--only to be struck down. The Congress decided that the best protection against flood damage came in the shape of dams, dikes, and levees built by the Army Corps of Engineers. A re-awakening of both public and Congressional interest in national flood insurance was to happen, however. In 1960 Hurricane Donna was to leave a path of destruction. In 1961 -3- Hurricane Carla was to seriously hit the coastal areas. Then "Betsy" struck in 1965, leaving a trail of havoc. Hurricane Betsy inspired feasibility studies, which were to provide the framework for the National Flood Insurance Act. This law, signed August 1, 1968, tied flood plain management to community eligibility for joining the program. Communities wanting to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program would have to satisfy established Federal flood plain management regulations in their flood hazard areas, and to enforce these regulations. As soon as a community joined the National Flood Insurance Program, its citizens became eligible to purchase flood insurance at affordable rates. However, four years after the bill-signing, the Federal Insurance Administration had only 95,000 policyholders representing some $1.5 billion in coverage. But, in 1973, following the "Year of the Floods," major changes to the original act were made by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973. This Act required the purchase of flood insurance in participating flood-prone communities as a condition for federal or federally-related loans or other federal financial assistance for property located in identified flood-plain areas. After this act went into effect, community membership grew from 2,000 in 1973 to 16,000 by June 1977. The number of policies increased from 300,000 to over one million. 1978 marked a turning point for the operation of the National Flood Insurance Program. In January of that year, the program changed from a Federal/private insurance industry arrangement to a fully Federal operation in which insurance service functions were assumed by a private concern under contract with the Federal Insurance Administration. This change-over resulted in a first-year savings of about $15 million over the previous mode of operation. THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM To qualify for the National Flood Insurance Program, a community applies to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to join the first phase of that program, the Emergency Program, by adopting and enforcing preliminary flood plain management measures. Once a community is in this phase of the program, a detailed on-site survey is arranged by the Federal Insurance Administration. This survey determines flood levels for that community. When the survey is completed, the community then qualifies for the next, or Regular, phase of the program by adopting, and enforcing, more comprehensive flood plain construction measures. When a community first enters the National Flood Insurance Program, its residents are eligible to purchase as much as $35,000 worth of coverage for their homes and $10,000 on the contents under the "Emergency" phase. When their community qualifies under -4- the Regular Program, the coverage limits are increased to $185,000 on residential structures and $60,000 on the contents. Coverage is also available for multi-family residential structures, small businesses, churches and other structures and their contents. Any licensed property and casualty insurance agent can write this coverage and it will become effective five days after application is made. If there is a transfer of title, coverage is effective immediately. When coverage is being increased or when a community is less than 30 days into either phase of the Program, the effective date of coverage is the next day. Coverage written under the limited "Emergency" phase is subsidized by the government so premium payments are low. Twenty-five dollars would pay for $10,000 worth of building coverage to a residence and $123 pays for the maximum coverage available under Emergency phase limits...$35,000 on structure and $10,000 on contents. "Regular" program rates are determined actuarially (according to risk), often producing lower rates than those for the "Emergency" phase for wisely built construction. In an average year, river flooding will cause $3 billion in property damage in the U.S. In 1978, NFIP paid out nearly $140 million to policyholders. If the goals of the program are realized, fewer people will require taxpayer-funded disaster relief than ever before. This will happen both because of the increased amounts of flood insurance coverage in force and because of the wider acceptance by communities of local flood plain management measures, enacted initially by a community to reduce exposure to the hazards of flood and as a condition for Federal flood insurance. For more information, interested persons should call their insurance agent or broker, or call the National Flood Insurance Program toll-free number, (800) 638-6620. AUGUST 1980 19o0 Nov mn~er 24, ~ TO: S tFB J£CT: City H~nagers/A~nlinistrators in Hennepin County I{ar !~ Larson County Jail Fe~z I was invited to. attend a me,.=~ng last week in regard to the implementation of t_he new county jail fee system. Tile fe'~-- sched,xl~_ hue been adopted by the Count~ at $58~ 00 per -- booking effective January 1, i9:~i. County Staff indicated this is prob~_bly only the ·first of several services that will be put on the fee system. They have been instructed to look at other areas of service and-do intend.to ask. several managers to serve on a con%mithee' to look at areas suitable-for fees and the imple- mentation schedule. As far as'I am concerned the 'Cc,runty-is to be ccm_~ended for tak- ~]g such asuep. This is the 's~ane action many of us have taken In our o~.-city, and lt..appears .to be an excellent.way to begin . tc put co~t',~].reC;'-'ly on [Ii~ us~£~rather-than the general t~xpayer. I-~m ,,:~-itJng this memo for two reasons'.- First, is to share some -of 'tile in£orm, ation witt~ }"o,u and second,: is te-urge your coopera- '~i0n '~'~ astahli~b_w.2nt of a ~..e scl',e'3ule for this and other services. '£.here .were fcu~ Chiefs of Police at the meeting. _"~,ey appeared in oppositJon to the fee and a]/~.ost stated right out that they felt the fees Were illegal and if not illegal at least not moral. A stateJ~.~.~nt :~.,,as a3 _~o'-made tba~ .~..eg'al. action would be considered in an. effort to blo2k the use. of a service ch3.rgc of this type. I - ~3ust such a- staten~¢n~ was' just ~e~ talking and was not a repre- sentation of the &ct,:,~l vie,.' of. a cz~y. ' - - -If the rationa].e is that these at~d other: servJ.ces are-the County's r,c~s~nsibility to prcvi de ,- thc:: %,~_ ~nouid turn m,~ny of our local functions over to the County and h;..;,e th~m provided only on the · basis of a Count.~-wide tax. The jcinL system couIG be handled by. a system 0f :.-~gicn-.--i lock-ups, totally -under County control, if that's what we w~a'...t. Attach,~d ~rc two..rcports. One ,~hows ~'' . .... - ..n= tax impact, of ~he new sys- tom, -The other-the basis for'the $58.00 fca. As you c~n s~e, the new .sy:~'ccra' _urovicles a .$11Ot '~O'~" sa,,in'.qs to the subu£b~ area. - Several ~czn~.% were .d%~cus.~ed a~ to'~.np]:~.mentatio_n. First~ fe!enims are State r'e~f~-,nsi}:J.3 ltv ~nd bookings will ~.ot he chaxge~'.back t,~'- ...... . -2- TO: City Managers/A~ministrators in Hennepin Cour, ty FROM: County Jail Fees among the cities with a warrant out on the individual. A booking on a warrant from a city other than the one making the arrest will be charged back to the city responsible for the warrant. One area without an answer was the case of a DWI charged under State Law. The fee distribution was not known. -The C~unty--under~nds there~ilt probablybe disagreement on +.ha first attempts at billing. Consequently, they intend to have a co~-unittee with Managers and Police review the program after the first two months of billings so standard policies can be developed. I trust .this information will assist in your understanding of the system. Harl~ G Lar November 24, 1980 enc, cc: Da le Ackm~n Colin Kastanos 1981 ADC RATE CALCULATION (ba~ed upon actual 1070 ADC Booking Residential (Booking) (Residentia DIRECT COSTS Personal Services $ 1,119,838 Co~odi ti es 26,960 Services 1,294 Other Charges 82 Subtotal $ 1,148,174 $ 1,831,720 229,494 50,733 126 $ 2,112,073 A11 owabl e Depreci ati on TOTAL DIRECT 2,770 10 ~744 $ 1,150,944 ' $ 2,122,817 MBC MTCE & OP'G COSTS TOTAL 49,731 $ 1,200,675 19~,858 $ 2,315,675 (Less) PENSION RELIEF NET CHARGEABLE COSTS · (63,848) (129,631) $ 1,136,827 $ 2,186,04~ UNITS OF SERVICE 19,361 90,039 Bookings Prisoner Days COST/UNIT $ 58.72 $ 24.28 BUILDING DEPRECIATION (ADC ONLY) Cost/Unit 1.96 1.63 ( 37,908) DEPARTMENTAL OVERHEAD Accounting Administration Employee Development TOTAL Cost/Unit 4.67 2.04 (9o?4o) COUNTYWIDE OVERHEAD - EXCLUDING CAPITAL & MBC Cost/Unit Total Cost/Unit $68.21 2.38 $3O. 33 $ 7.58 per .1/4 day (55,338) .(147,00E (183,62/11 Impact of Change in Jail Fees I. Property Tax Requirement 1981 Jail Budget Billings-- Minneapolis Suburbs Fed/State Total Billings Property'Tax Requirement Fee Structure Old $4,336,800 New $4.,336,800' $ 360,000 280,000 $ 640,000 $3,696,800 $ 573,000 153,000 318,000 $1,044;000 $3,292,800 Property Tax Spread Minneapolis Suburbs Total Assessed Value $2.084 3.898 $5.982 Mill Rate Old New .618 .551 .618 .551 Pr'operty Tax Old $1,288,200 2,408,600 $3,696,800 New $1,147,400 2,145,400 $3,292,800 III. Mpls. Suburbs' Fed/State Total Impact of Change Property Tax $1,288,200 2,408,600_ $3,696,800 Billed $360,000 280,000 $640,000 Total $1,648,200 2,408,600 280,000 $4,336,800 New Property Tax $1,!47,400 2,145,400 $3,292,800 Billed $ 573,000 153,000 318,000 $1,044,000 Total $1,720,400 2,298,400 318,000 $4,336,800 Difference $ 72,200 (110,200) 38,000 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 21, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-90 SUBJECT: Beavers In Block 24 of Seton, we have 2, 3 or 4 beaver dens and the beavers are destroying the trees in the neighborhoods which results in calls from irate citizens. We turned to D.N.R. and got no help; we think because of the City's ordinance which states: Section 51.29 Hunting Prohibited. No person, or persons, shall hereafter, within the City of Mound take, capture, or trap any animals or birds. (Ord. 398 5/30/79) The Police have been trying to live trap the beavers so they can be transplanted, but have had little success. Does the Council wish to change the ordinance? The previous ordinance allowed trapping and shouting with permission of the City. At times, muskrats and squirrels get so bad they damage property and now we have beavers. Lednard L. Kopp v· 2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 24, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-91 SUBJECT: Refund of Fee In September, we received two applications for subdivision of the same piece of land and two fees were paid. One was paid by the owner of the property and the other by a Real Estate Agent. Attached is a copy of a letter from the Real Estate Agent requesting the refund of fee of $35.00. In checking with the owner, she agreed that the refund of the duplicate fee be made to the Real Estate Agent. This will be listed with the bills for payment. cc: City Clerk REALTORS® November 19, 1980 City of Mound 5341 Maywood Rd. Mound, MN Attn: City Council I have been involved in helping Mr. James Brown, a buyer and seller of land in the City of Mound. Mr. Brown has been in and out of town a lot and to help him, he asked me to make the appropriate applications for the subdivision of his Property. He, at the same time, also made application thus we have double applications and double fees involved. After three and one half months of these efforts, I am no longer involved in any way and I am now asking that my application fees be refunded to me immediately. Thank you for your prompt attention. Mr. John Arnott, Realtor Associate JOHN THOMAS REAL ESTATE, INC. ' pRAIRIEROAD M -~ PHONE: 933-1020 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION OF Sec. 22.03-a VILLAGE OF MOUND LAND FEE ~',o 0 IO. OO $ 3,T'. O0 FEE OWNER PLAT '~ 77/ ? PARCEL Location and complete legal description of property to be divided: I b~ oo0 To be divided as follows: (attach survey or scale drawing showing adjacent streets, dimension of proposed building sites, square foot area of each new parcel designated by number) A WAIVER IN LOT SIZE IS REQUESTED FOR: New Lot No. From Reason: Square feet TO CITY OF MOUND {signature) ADDRESS ,,q~O C(~ ~1~1~1¢ /-'>'~-'~.. Applicant's interest in ~e property: ~/~ This application must be signed by all the OWNERS of the prope~, or an explan- ation given why this is not the case. TEL. NO. DATE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Giving preliminary approval to plan subject to Engineer's recommendation and etermination of avajlabil|ty of services, etc. DATE Sept. 29, 1980 P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Pres. · Albert L. Lehman · James S. Russell · John E. Thomas · Barbara Gudmundson LAKE MINNETONKA NOTICE OF CHANGE OF DATE OF REGULAR DECEMBER ~4EETING The December meeting of the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will be held Thursday, December 11, 1980, at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota, commencing at 7:30 p.m. The agenda for the meeting will follow in approximately ten days. CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota 12-2-80 November 19, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-88 SUBJECT: Hazard Waste Disposal Site Attached is a copy of the official notice on the search for a Hazardous Material Disposal Site. In addition, they are requesting public input and asking for names of persons to put on the committee. 7 TO : FROM : SUBJECT: STA';E OF MINNESOTA 'ASTE MANAGEMENT BOA 123 THORSON BUILDING 7323 58TH AVENUE NORTH CRYSTAL, MINNESOTA OFFICIAL Affected Communities,/ Robert G. Dunn Chairman SEARCH AREA NOTIFICATION HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL SITE ROBERTG DUNN CHAIRMAN TELEPHONE: OUTSTATE 1-800-65~*g747 N O T I F I C A T I O N November lO, 1980 This memo is an official notification that the Minnesota Waste Management Board has identified your community as a possible search area for a hazardous waste disposal facility. This notice is a part of the required siting process set in motion by the Minnesota Legislature under the Waste Management Act of 1980. The Legisla- ture, after much deliberation, decided that a hazardous waste land disposal facility was needed in Minnesota. The Waste Management Board was created and given the task of siting at least one such land disposal facility. The Board also must inventory and recommend preferred sites for hazardous waste processing, incineration, and transfer and storage facilities. Your community may be considered as a potential site for these facilities as well. The hazardous waste disposal facility that we are considering will be based on successful waste management practices and technologies used elsewhere in the United States. No decision has been made yet about the final facility design--the Legislature decided that it should first be the subject of public discussion and debate--but an enclosed sheet suggests some of the technologies that may be used as well as why such facilities are needed. Naturally, you will ask, "On what basis have you chosen us as a possible search area for a hazardous waste disposal facility?'l The answer is this-- we have not yet eliminated any community. We want to share the information we have and get your ideas before we make a final decision. We must make some major decisions on criteria and sites soon. The law requires that by May 1981, the Waste Management Board must propose six or more candidate sites for the hazardous waste land disposal facility. That means that between now and May 1981, we must discuss and select criteria and apply those criteria BOARD MEMBERS: DISTRICT I LAURENCE HUNTER. Hasbngs DISTRICT 2 KEITH KUITERS. Clarks Grove DISTRICT 3 WI;_LIAM KIRCHNER, Richfielci DISTRICT 4 MILTON KNOLL, JR, White Bear Lake DISTRICT 5 LOUISE KUDERLING, Minneapolis DISTRICT 6 THOMAS RENNER, Elk River DISTRICT 7 ALLAN EIDE, Hitterdal DISTRICT 8 DAVID HARTLEY. Hermantown .! - 2 - to the entire State. Obviously, criteria become very important to the selection process. Depending on th~ criteria, any locality in Minncsota~ includin~ ¥ours~ could be selected as a site for this facility. In keeping with both the spirit and letter of the Waste Management Act, the Minnesota Waste Management Board will select criteria and candidate sites only after extensive public involvement at the local level. As a local official, you and/or a representative of your community are invited and encouraged to participate in this process. If you ignore this public input process, then your community may not be fully represented as criteria are discussed and selected. Enclosed with this memo is a reply card. Please return it to us with the names and mailing addresses of the person or persons from your community who will help Minnesota select criteria for the siting of a hazardous waste land disposal facility. The persons whose names you give us, together with other interested citizens, will form a criteria and siting committee in your Development Region. A similar committee will be formed in each of the 13 Development Regions of the State. Regional Development Commission staff representatives may help the committees by arranging meeting space, taking minutes, sending notices, etc. The committees will meet at least twice between now and May 1981. Their job is to give the Waste Management Board significant input into the process of select- ing criteria and sites for a hazardous waste disposal facility. Also enclosed is a step-by-step schedule which details the procedures the Waste Management Board will follow in selecting candidate and final sites for the disposal facility. As you can see, there is also opportunity for public involve- ment after the candidate sites have been selected. Your involvement prior to that time, however, can help determine whether or not your community is in the final list. Another enclosure for your consideration before our upcoming meetings is a fact sheet on siting factors that have been suggested to us. Some of these factors might eliminate your area from further consideration. Others might identify your community as a likely location for a hazardous waste disposal site. Although we are listing these factors without endorsement, we will have to choose between them soon so we can identify sites. So come to the meeting in your Development Region if you agree or disagree with these factors or if you have others to propose. We want your recommendations and suggestions on the criteria, standards, and procedures we should use in selecting candidate sites, either at the meeting or by letter before then. Your community is a possible site for a hazardous waste disposal facility. Your community should help the Waste Management Board determine where and on what basis this facility ought to be sited. We have no preconceived notions. We do, however, agree with the Legislature that hazardous, non-nuclear waste is a problem and that something has to be done. We also know that the problem, while serious, is not yet critical. Together we can find a solution. But we need your help to do it. Please send us the names of your community representatives no later than November 21, 1980. RGD:mhr Enclosures WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD SITING TIMETABLE Disposal Facilities - November, 1980. The Waste Management Board (WMB) notifies communities in search areas for hazardous waste disposal facilities. - November, 1980 - May, 1981. Public meetings will be held in each Development Region to discuss and recommend siting criteria to the WMB. - May, 1981. The WMB must propose six or more candidate sites for commercial hazardous waste disposal facilities. - May, 1981 - August, 1981. Additional meetings as well as hearings will be held in the Development Regions on the proposed candidate sites. - August, 1981. The WMB will select six candidate sites in six different counties--one per county. Subsequently, the Governor will appoint a Local Project Review Committee from each affected county to act as a communication link between the affected community and the involved state agencies to relay information and local concerns. Each Local Proiect Review Committee must select a temporary voting member to serve on the Waste Management Board to represent his or her community in the siting deliberations of the WMB. - January, 1982. The WMB will present two reports to the Legislative Commission on Waste Management, after consultation with the Local Project Review Com- mittees and after a public meeting in each affected county. One report will be on mitigation of local effects of a hazardous disposal facility, and will propose ways to reduce local impacts and compensate the host communities. The other report will be on hazardous waste management, and will contain a draft hazardous waste management plan and a proposed certificate of need for one or more disposal facilities. - May, 1982. The WMB will issue a certificate of need for hazardous waste disposal facilities that will specify the size and types of disposal facilities to be built at one or more of the candidate sites. - September, 1982. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will complete environmental impact statements on disposal facilities at each of the six candidate sites. - Spring, 1983. The WMB will select one or more of the sites for disposal facilities, after hearings in each county, discussions with affected local governments and others, and after consideration of the Pollution Control Agency's environmental impact statements. Processing Facilities - June l, 1981. The WMB will propose at least 9 sites to appear on a hazardous waste processing site inventory, including (1) three incineration sites, (2) three chemical processing sites, and (3) three transfer and storage sites. - November l, 1981. The WMB will prepare a final inventory of processing sites. WHAT IS ~.RDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOS! AND WHY DOES MINNESOTA NEED ONE? FACILITY Along with the benefits of modern technology come certain drawbacks. To make our standard of living possible, a variety of manufacturing processes furnish necessary products. Those same processes, however, produce by-products and eventually wastes. These include, for example, miscellaneous chemicals, waste oils and solvents, paint sludges, electro- plating wastes, and incinerator ashes. These waste by-products must be safely disposed of or effectively recycled or reprocessed. Most wastes from industry do not constitute a problem, but some do. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency have identified certain wastes from industrial, laboratory, medical, mining, and agricultural activities as "hazardous." (Actually, even some household activities could generate hazardous wastes.) Unlike solid waste, such as household garbage, hazardous wastes usually cannot be routinely managed in a sanitary landfill. Specially designed facilities may be necessary to ensure that these wastes are reduced and disposed of safely. Processing facilities can recycle or reduce the amount of hazardous waste, and disposal facilities are used for long-term containment. Technology exists to ensure the safe disposal of hazardous waste, but currently Minnesota does not have the facilities needed to manage the hazardous wastes generated by our state (more than 150,000 tons per year, by one estimate). It is the responsibility of the Waste Management Board to determine specifically what sizes and types of facilities are needed to manage these wastes, and then to find a site for at least one land disposal facility in the State. The private sector will be expected to construct and operate the facilities once the sites are finally chosen. Since the technical options available must be tailored to the specific needs of the State, Minnesotans must register their opinions on the need, safety, cost, benefit and effect of a hazardous waste disposal facility. That's why public involvement is needed. Without this involvement, it is too early to say exactly what Minnesota's land disposal facility will look like. However, a general picture can be tentatively drawn. The land disposal facility would be large - possibly 400 acres if it is to contain 20 years of Minnesota's land disposable hazardous waste. "Cells" for waste containment would be constructed, first by excavating soil and then by installing engineering safeguards against waste seepage. These would probably include carefully placed clay or synthetic liner systems and underground collection pipes to collect seepage and return it to the surface for treatment. There would also be monitoring systems to warn if any seepage had penetrated the liners and escaped into surrounding soils. Wastes would probably be trucked in; possibly 20 to 30 loads a day. Laboratory spot checks (on or off site) would ascertain the identity and appropriate management of incoming wastes. Pre-treatment of certain wastes would probably be required, and could occur either at the disposal site or at a waste processing facility elsewhere. This would have the effect of reducing the volume or the level of hazard of the wastes, or of removing excess water that could complicate operations or carry contaminants away from the land disposal facility. Incompatible wastes would be separated and placed in different parts of the site, and accurate records of all wastes disposed and their locations in the facility would be maintained. As individual waste containment cells were filled during the operation of a site, impermeable soils or liners would be placed over them and the top soil would be contoured to handle rain runoff. This would help divert moisture from the wastes and still further reduce the chance of seepage away from the site. Final closure of the facility would be performed according to strict federal and state environmental standards. Before the facility operator could even be licensed he or she would have to have determined provisions for long-term care of the site. Included would be final cover and contouring, and groundwater and other long-term monitoring of the site. Any problems would have to be corrected by the facility operator alone or in conjunction with federal or state authorities. This description is only preliminary, since the final design of the facility is one of the issues for public discussion before the Waste Management Board makes any final decisions. prepared by: Minnesota Waste Management Board 7323 58th Avenue North Crystal, MN 55428 POSSIBLE SITING FACTORS The Waste Management Board (WMB) decided not to select s~t;ng cr;ter[a {or a ~azardous waste c~is136~l facility until citizens throughout the State had expressed their opinions on the subject. However, to encourage discussion the WMB is now mentioning certain factors that have been suggested to the WMB or in past siting studies. They are stated without endorsement by the WMB, and are merely a starting point for the discussion that will guide the WMB in choosing final criteria and sites that are acceptable to most of the interested citizens of the State. These factors reflect opinions of various government agencies and other organizations regarding the best types of locations to site hazardous waste land disposal facilities, based on such concerns as groundwater protection, transportation safety, economic feasibility, industrial development, and health, safety, and nuisance impacts on the nearby public. These are not the final siting criteria, nor have they been given any weights relative to each other. Maps will be available at future meetings in your Development Region that show how your community stands on some of these factors. Other factors may not be mapped because statewide data is unavailable or because they cannot be researched and analyzed until specific sites are under consideration. HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATION -- Hazardous waste generation is often concentrated in industrialized areas. It has been suggested that disposal facilities should not be sited too far from the points of generation because of increased transportation costs and risks. In Minnesota, the only statewide data currently available indicates that the major generating areas are the Twin Cities Metropolitan area and Southeast Minnesota, generating an estimated 66 percent and 18 percent of the State's hazardous wastes, respectively. It is difficult to say how close a disposal facility should be to the generating areas. One suggested figure is 100 miles or less, although today certain wastes are being trucked about 400 miles to facilities in Illinois and elsewhere. TRANSPORTATION ACCESS - Reports done for the Pollution Control Agency and other government bodies have suggested that transportation access may be an important siting factor, since it will determine the roadways that hazardous waste will move over and the likelihood and the possible harmful effects of any accidents. Possible aspects to consider include adjacent land uses (e.g., schools, hospitals, and residences), the number of intersections per mile, and the distance from certain types of main highways (e.g., limited access four-lane roadways; State and federal highways; or 9-ton capacity roads). SETTLEMENT PATTERNS -- A study of hazardous waste done for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency suggests that a hazardous waste land disposal facility and buffer zone could require about 420 acres to contain 20 years worth of Minnesota-generated wastes. This size is very tentative and will be finally determined only after further analysis, public discussion, and decisions regarding what wastes may be land disposed in Minnesota. Still, the 420-acre figure suggests that areas of dense population settlement may not contain land parcels large enough for a facility. LAND OWNERSHIP PATTERNS - Land ownership patterns may affect the feasibility of acquiring parcels of land large enough to accommodate a hazardous waste land disposal faciliW. They also can affect the types of adjacent land uses that may be subject to nuisance impacts from a facility. Some of the land ownership patterns that may be considered include the number of different owners and whether ownership is public or private. In the case of public ownership, distinctions must be made between which level of govern- ment owns the land and what the land's dedicated use or category is, such as park, forest, or tax forfeited land. It may only be practical to research many of these questions after specific sites are identified, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT EFFECTS -- A hazardous waste disposal faciliW could attract industrial de- velopment, especially if the impacted community and the State decide to provide incentives to companies to locate near the site. Preference may be given to communities that desire such development and have sufficiently large industrial park locations available. Some of the issues raised by this and other factors will be the subject of a report the WMB will prepare for the Legislative Commission on Waste Management on the mitigation of local effects of hazardous waste facilities. This report will be prepared jointly with citizens from the candidate site communities, and may recommend that the Legislature consider such programs as tax relief, reimbursement for public services, or incentives for industrial development. PRODUCTIVITY OF THE LAND FOR VARIOUS USES - Land is a natural resource, and some land is more suited for certain uses than others. Possible uses to consider are agriculture, forestry, mining, wildlife habitats, and public enjoyment of natural environment. The WMB may have to make hard choices between sites and uses because one candidate site may be good for one use, and another candidate site may be good for another use. To choose between these different uses, factors to consider include: the relative productivity of the candidate site for the particular use, the availability of other suitable land for that use, and the emphasis that the people of the Development Region and the State want to place on the different possible uses. It should be noted that the Legislature has decided that no land may be excluded from consideration for a site unless it is unlikely to qualify for a Pollution Control Agency permit. HYDROGEOLOGY- The Geological Survey (MGS) has I a report to the WMB that recommends that hazardous waste disposal sites be located away from major groundwater systems, such as significant bedrock and surficial aquifers. This would insure that a disposal facility would be less likely to pollute these natural resources by acc~denta~ seepage. MGS recommends that the WMB divide the State into three categories: · Areas where there is a Iow probability of groundwater contamination because significant groundwater resources are probably absent. · Areas where productive groundwater systems may or may not exist, so that there is a reduced probability of finding naturally favorable sites. · Areas where significant groundwater systems exist, and where extensive engineering or natural protection (e.g., Iow permeability clay soils) would be necessary to safeguard these groundwater systems from any accidental seepage from a disposal facility. SOIL PERMEABILITY - The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has stated that thick layers of Iow permeable soils -- such as certain heavy clays -- will inhibit the flow of spilled wastes into groundwater systems below even if the wastes somehow penetrate the engineered safeguards of a facility (such as liners and collection devices). Therefore, thick, impermeable soils might compensate for inadequacies in the hydrogeology factor. EPA at one point used the figures of five feet of material with a permeability of less than two inches per year. Such exact data are not available on a statewide basis, so on-site investigations would be necessary to determine the permeabilities and soil thicknesses of specific tracts of land - if the citizens of the State and the WMB finally decide that soil permeability is an important siting factor. SURFACE WATERS AND FLOODPLAINS- The Pollution Control Agency and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency regulate hazardous waste disposal. Though they offer few specific siting criteria, they do prohibit certain locations, including: within a 100-year flood plain; within 1,000 feet of shoreland; and within a wetland. These surface water factors must be observed by the WMB in the siting process, although they may become most relevant only after specific sites are being considered. This is because many of these prohibited areas are often less than a township in size. So although a part of a township is excluded, there still may be enough land within it for an acceptable site. prepared by: Minnesota Waste Management Board 7323 58th Avenue North Crystal, MN 55428 12-2-80 CITY OF MOUND Mound, Minnesota November 19, 1980 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 80-89 SUBJECT: Tonkamobile Ridership Report Attached is a copy of a report received from the Metropolitan Transit Commission relative to Ridership on the Tonkamobile. BACKGROUND In the 1970's, the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), conducted a series of Route Ridership Improvement projects which were designed to improve public transit services throughout the seven-county metropolitan area. One of the studies focused on western Hennepin County which lead to a document entitled: "Western Hennepin Route Ridership Improvement Project". The Western Hennepin Project contained'a discussion of a transit improvement program which included possibilities for new types of transit service. One of the proposed services dealt with fixed routes interfacing with local paratransit service. This concept involved focusing transit services on subregional activity centers, in response to the Transportation Development Guide Policy Plan. Fixed route service would serve to link the subregional activity center with the metro center, and paratransit service would provide mobility from outlying neighborhoods to the subregional activity center. In 1977, the MTC submitted a preliminary application to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT), for a paratransit system which would serve the Lake Minnetonka Area. The system focused on the use of small vehicles and proposed to serve the area by providing transportation to subregional activity centers. In August, 1978, the final application for funding was submitted and subsequently approved. In April of 1980 the project began operation with non-peak service. Peak service was added in May. A Community Advisory Committee, formed from members of the Western Hennepin Route Ridership Improvement Project Advisory Committee and community input serves to review project progress, approve and endorse major project activities and aid with the dissemination of information. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE The system is twofold: a point deviation system and an employee subscription service. Six vehicles are leased to the Town Taxi Company of St. Louis Park by the MTC for the duration of the project. Four vehicles are used at any one time. An additional handicapped accessible vehicle is also available for use. The employee subscription service accommodates work oriented trips. Two vehicles operate between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, to serve Cargill, Minnetonka Industrial Park, Opus II and Fingerhut. A person desiring service registers with Town Taxi. The monthly cost is $32.00. This service is available to residents of Wayzata, Greenwood, Deephaven, Minne- tonka, Excelsior and Greenland. Between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and on Saturday between 8:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., four vehicles operate by point deviation. Vehicles are scheduled to stop at a given point at a designated time; between points the vehicles may deviate to accommodate passenger trip requests. The service area includes Mound, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Excelsior, Minnetonka and Wayzata, Deephaven, Shorewood, Greenwood and Woodland. Points are coordinated with MTC regular route service and transfers granted by the system are honored by regular route transit and vice versa. To utilize the point deviation system, a person may either board the vehicle at a designated point or call the radio dispatch center at least two hours in advance of the trip for door-to-door service. The dispatcher schedules the trip within the time frame available for pickups between scheduled time points. Service is provided with less than two hours notice if vehicles and drivers are in service and reasonably available. The fare stru6ture is based on a f~" fixed fare between points and a premium, 20¢, is levied for each deviation. ;ersons under 17 and over 65 years of age travel for half fare and children under six ride free when accompanied by an adult. PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF SERVICE To date, ridership (Attachment one) on the TonkaMobile has been significantly less than expected. Although average daily ridership has shown monthly increase, the system is underutilized. Based on ridership, discussions are underway to revamp the service. Consideration is being given, based on present ridership, to eliminate service in the western portion of the service area including Mound and Spring Park. The western terminus would become County Road 15 and Spring, although selected daily runs would run to Twin Birch Health Care Facility to accommodate persons utilizing the congregate dining facility. Eliminating unproductive service would result in more frequent service to areas that are utilizing the existing service. FUTURE The Lake Minnetonka Paratransit Project is a one year demonstration with the overall management and marketing provided by the MTC and day-to-day operations subcontracted to Town Taxi of St. Louis Park. During the first quarter of 1981, an evaluation will be conducted to determine whether or not the project goals and objectives have been achieved. The Minnesota Department of Transportation will also analyze the system. Results of both analyses will be used as a base to determine the future of the system. During the initial demonstration phase, the project deficit is wholly funded by the Minnesota Department of Transportation under the State Paratransit Grant Program. If the project is to continue beyond the demonstration phase, financial support from participating communities will be necessary. It is anticipated that during the second year of operations a community match of 10% of the deficit will be sought. Preliminary budget estimates for the March, 1981 - April, 1982 contract period indicate the projected deficit will be $330,0001. 10% of this would equal $33,000. Following the proposed service realignments, the population base of the communi- ties receiving service would be 56,970 . If 10% of the deficit ($33,000) was prorated over the population base, a per capita community contribution of 58¢ would be necessary to meet the match. The estimated financial support from each community would be: Community Population Financial Support Deephaven 3,670 $ 2,130 Excelsior 2,680 1,550 Greenwood 600 350 Minnetonka 39,150 22,710 Shorewood 4,670 2,710 Tonka Bay 1,520 880 Wayzata 4,110 2,380 Woodland 570 330 56,970 $33,040 1. Budget figures reflected are estimations and are subject to revision. 2. Based on data supplied by the Metropolitan Council Forcasts April, 1980. Attachment 1 Senior Regular Minors Handicapped Children Transfers TOTAL Non-Peak Daily Non-Peak Average Subscription TOTAL Total Daily Average Number of Operating Days TONKAMOBILE RIDERSHIP 1980 April 424 88 35 12 64 623 34.61 May 510 146 48 9 10 110 833 30.85 June 479 220 652 1 110 15 1,477 61.54 623 34.61 18 1,206 2,039 84.96 24 1,224 2,701 112.54 24 July 511 168 776 9 66 172 1,702 58.69 2,100 3,802 131.10 29 August 400 155 752 1 35 160 1,503 62.63 1,840 3,343 139.29 24 September 458 169 234 2 86. 136 1,085 47.17 2,162 3,247 141.17 23 PERCENTAGE TOTAL PASSENGER ON Bay Center to Ridgedale: June July August Bay Center 3.79 4.05 3.35 Hwy. 101 & 5 4.71 2.77 1.50 County Rd. 3 & 4 6.07 5.39 5.03 City Hall 3.14 2.55 1.50 Cedar Lake & McGinty .14 .53 .88 Ridgedale 13.79 11.68 18.61 31.64 26.97 30.90 7 - Hi (transfer point) 29.71 35.18 36.07 Mound to Archer: Mound-Westonka Tuxedo & Donald Mound Depot Twin Birch Co. Rd. 15 & Co. Rd. 15 & Co. Rd. 19 & Co. Rd. 19 & Spring 19 Woodpecker Smithtown Shorewood Village Second & Water Third & Division Stratford Woods Minnetonka High School Archer Heights 1.86 1.05 3.43 2.25 5.14 6.97 .57 - · 93 .98 2.36 .75 2.29 1.58 2.07 2.62 4.36 4.94 1.00 1.43 .71 2.47 4.07 1.28 9.86 11.53 1.32 2.03 4.41 .26 1.23 .79 1.59 2.82 5.82 .53 2.65 .70 8.91 38.65 37.85 33.05 100% 100% 100% PERCENT TOTAL PASSENGERS OFF June Jul~ August Bay Center-Rid~edal~ Bay Center Hwy. 101 & 5 Cty. Rd. 3 & 4 City Hall Cedar Lake & McGinty Ridgedale 5.07 1.70 7.07 2.77 .62 26.30 43.53 5.41 1.75 5.89 1.28 .32 26.55 41.20 2.96 .74 4.63 .65 .98 27.61 37.52 7 - Hi 23.64 27.75 31.31 Mound-Archer Mound Westonka Mound Depot Tuxedo & Donald Twin Birch Co. Rd. 15 & Spring Co. Rd. 15 & 19 Co. Rd. 19 & Woodpecker Co. Rd. 19 & Smithtown Shorewood Village Second & Water Third & Division Stratford Woods Minnetonka H. S. Archer Heights 2.93 1.54 6.07 .39 1.62 2.00 1.08 1.92 4.90 .77 .16 1.77 7.68 32.83 100% 1.91 1.20 6.84 .16 1.28 .80 1.36 3.34 4.54 1.19 .24 8.19 31.05 100% 1.94 .37 6.38 1.30 .93 1.20 3.42 4.34 · 84 1.02 1.02 8.41 31.12 100% SUBSCRIBER ie~PLICATION PLEASE PRINT the following information using only one letter per box, Abbreviate where necessary. Be specific ,FFIC£ name and work address. Example: Is it a 5ffeet (St.), R0ad (Rd,), Avenue {Ave,), etc,? Provide apartment number SE where applicable. This information is confidential and will be treated accordingly ,NLY FORMS WITHOUT COMPLETE INFORMATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED. Jrrent Month 15~_ Last Name First Name i Home Address -- Number and Street Apt. No. el City State Zip Code ;ompany ID ~- Company ~:lre.~ Hon~ Phone Company Name Work Phone Ext. ~ How do you currently ~q: to work? How did you hoar about the ser~¢e? {Handicapp~ S~r~ce Require} ~o ~[~ (Please use one ofthe numerical codes.) ~' 1. Driv~ Alone 1. Brochure ~ 2. Bus 2. Company Newsletter 3. Walk or Bike 3. Newspaper 4. Carpool or Dropped off 4. Friend 5. Subscription Service 5. Other 6. Other (Explain) 6. Renewal ~, Hour Min Hour Min ~- A~ your work hours flexible by more than 15 minutes? YES (1) ~ NO A $3Z.00 ~ Check or __ money order payable to TonkaMobile is enclosed. NOTE: Subscriptions for the following month must be received by the 1Sth of the preceding month, Mail to: TonkaMobile c/o Town Taxi ?440 Oxford St. St. Louis Park. MN $$4Z6 Questions may be answered by calling the TonkaMobile at 935-3100. TonkaMobile is sponsored by the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Minnesot3 Department of Transportion and Town Taxi. COMMENTS A. THONIAS WURST GERALD T. CARROLL CURTIS A. PEarSON THOMAs F. UNDERWOOD ALBERT FAULCONER :El JAI~IES D, LARSON JOHN W, WOOD, JR, LAW OFFICES WURST, CARROLL & PEARSON mINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 November 20, 1980 TELEPHONE 338-8911 Mr. Len Kopp, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Re: Thomas and Sons v. Mound Dear Len: I am enclosing herewith copy of the letter from the American Arbitration Association confirming December 17 and 18 for continuation of the hearing. I am copying Lyle Swanson on this letter as I talked to him and Fred about getting organized with the documents which the City will want to introduce. I also call your attention to their letter and the necessity to send an additional $300 to the American Arbitration Association. Would you please see that that check is submitted to Barbara Heinitz and copy me on the letter of transmittal so I know it has been done. I think Lyle wants to have another meeting prior to the December 17 hearing, and we can probably do that at their office, review the documents, and determine exactly how we intend to proceed. Ve~trul~'u~., City Attorney CAP:ih Enclosure cc: Mr. Lyle Swanson mrc-CETA OFFICE IN DOWNTOWN MOUND mrc-CETA assists job seekers in preparing for and finding permanent jobs. No cost employment and training services are provided at mrc-CETA. Specific eligibility requirements may vary according to the CETA program you are considering. Which of the following services match your employment needs? VOCATIONAL PLANNING- To determine job goals. TRAINING - On-the-Job or in the classroom. Learn skills for job seeking/keeping. JOB PLACEMENT - Help in finding the job best suited for you. PUBLIC SERVICE JOBS - Placement on temporary jobs, wages paid by CETA. WOMEN IN TRANSITION - A program for the homemaker who needs to enter or re-enter the job market. You may make an appointment to meet with an mrc-CETA intake worker at the Westonka Community Center Downstairs Office Complex, or at the mrc-CETA office in St. Louis Park. For more information or to schedule an appointment... Please Call 935-5517 Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 300 l~etro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291-6359 November 1980 Dear Local Officials: To assist your unit of government in monitoring your changing land uses and as an aid in your planning, I have, by separate mailing, provided your unit of government with a complimentary set of 1980 aerial photo prints of your community. The Council contractedwith Mark Hurd Photos to take the photos last spring. We did so as much to meet your needs for such information as our own. The photos, recently mailed to your chief staff official, are part of a set of 233 photos that cover the entire Twin Cities Area. The scale is 1 inch equals 800 feet. The photos are, in my view, a good example of the kind of appropriate technical assistance the Council can make available to your community. Sincerely, Ch ~ W -h '~-- aries eaver, u a~rman Metropolitan Counsz/i ~ . ~ ~eney Coordinate the and ~evelopm~t ~ the Twin Citi~ Metropolitan Area Comprising- Anoka County 0 Carver County O Dakota County O Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County O W~hington County ~.~/~TRE ETER REALTORS November 17, 1980 17717 HIGHWAY 7, MINN~TONKA. MINNESOTA 563/t3, PHON~ (61~i 1 -~B3gl Mr. Leonard Kopp City Manager 5341Mayview Road Mound, Minn. 55364 Dear Leonard: I just want to let you know how accomodating everyone has always been to me (and others). Very especially Mary Marske, most recently to my son Phillip, who is a student at St. Cloud. His problem was getting down to register to vote on an absentee ballot. Mary Marske said that if he couldn't get down by 4:30 October 31, she would come in on Saturday, November 1 to let him register and vote. That's above and beyond call of duty. This kindness and understanding should not go without notice, on the part of Mary Marske, and all the others employed by the City of Mound. Sincerely, Fred H. Kellogg, REALTOR Streeter-Andrus Real Estate, Inc. FHK:f cc: Mary Marske REAL ESTATE IN THE LAKE MINNETONKA AND WEST SUBURBAN AREA RESIDENTIAL · COMMERCIAL · APPRAISALS · LAND DEVELOPMENT 300 Metro Square Building, 7th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul,- Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291-6359 November 7, 1980 TO: METROPOLITAN AREA LEGISLATORS., MUNICIPAL AND TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS, AND INTERESTED CITIZENS The 1980. State Waste Management Act requires the Metropolitan C°uncil to prapare and submit a solid waste "abatement" report to the seven metropolitan counties by January 1981. The purpose of the report is to provide a planning framework the counties can use in developing alternatives for reducing the future need for sanitary landfills. A first draft of the report was prepared in September, and was discussed at a series of meetings held around the Twin Cities Area in October. A second draft of the report, entitled Land Disposal Abatement: Final Report, is now available by calling the Council's Public Information Office at 291-6464 (publication number 12-80-081). The Metropolitan Council will hold a special meeting Dec. 4 to hear public comments on the document. The public meeting will be held at. 7 p.m~ in the Metropolitan Council offices, 300 Metro Square Bldg., 7th and Robert Sts., St. Paul. You are cordially invited to attend and offer your comments. The final report draft contains goals and recommendations to guide abatement efforts of both private industry and government. It describes different kinds of abatement strategies, discusses potential methods of financing abatement programs, potential program costs and possible economic incentives that could encourage participation of private industry in abatement programs. ~other featura of the report is a recommended schedule for implementing - waste reduction, recycling, waste processing and resource recovery programs. The Twin Cities Area is expected to generate 3.1 million tons of solid waste annually by the year 2000. Without a shift to more recycling and resource recovery, it is estimated that the Twin Cities Area would need four times the landfill capacity it has now by the year 2000, even if five of the 11 existing landfills are allowed te expand as proposed. If waste generation trends continue, the Twin Cities Area could run out of capacity at its existing landfills between 1985 and 1987, even assuming landfills ewners receive permission to expand. An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising: Anoka County O Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington County However, difficulties in siting new landfills, risks of groundwater pollution and the growing demand for natural resources in relation to supply have all raised serious questions about the Twin Cities Area's continued reliance on landfills for dealing with solid wastes. Currently, only 14 percent of all solid waste generated in the Twin Cities Area is recycled; the remainder--86 percent--is disposed of in the 11 sanitary landfills. The report says that this reliance on landfills could be reversed dramatically in future years if programs like those recommended in the report are implemented. Council planners estimate that the Twin Cities Area could recycle or recover energy or useful materials from 74 to 89 percent of its trash by the year 2000. The recommendations call for expanding private industry efforts at waste reduction and recycling, and implementation of similar, government-sponsored programs between now and 1984. Major resource recovery projects, like t=ash-burning furnances, are not likely to become operational until the end of the 1980s, although use of. smaller, modular-type incinerators are a possibility before then, the report says. After the Dec. 4 public meeting, the report will undergo further revision. Adoption of the report by the Metropolitan Council is expected Dec. 18. If you would like a copy of the Council's most recent draft on abatement, please call the Public Information Office at 291-6464. If you would like to speak at the meeting, call 291-6482. Sincerely Chairman CW/kg Meeting Notice Hazardous Waste Disposal Site Search Area ~otification An important meeting regarding tIlis notification will be I~eld in Hennepin County at 7:00 p,m, on December 17j 1980, It will be I~eld at: Minnetonka City Hall Council Chambers For further information please contact the Waste Management Board at 7323 - 58ttl Avenue Northj Crystalj Minnesota 55428~ or call 612/536-0816, CHANHASSEN CHASKA EDEN PRAIRIE WAFTA LONG LAKE MOUND WATERTOWN MAPLE PLAIN ST. BONIFACIUS The October 15, 1980 meeting of ~,~LFTA was called to order by chairman Jerry Schlenk' at 7:45 p.m. at the WAFTA site. The minu~es of the September meeting were approved. Treasurer' s report: Checking account Savings account 195.59 6805.00 Bills to pay: Blackowiak & Son Magnuson Agency, Inc. Spancrete M~dwest Co. Bill Rand (3 keyp) Jerry Schlenk (parts) John McCoy (mowing & sec.) Continental Telephone Sys. NSP Frontier Lu~ber & .Sdwe. 80.00 293.00 3775.00 3.00 9.83 157.00 76.66 157.71 37.30 Mergers Electric 2500.00 A motion was made by Mound and seconded by Excelsior to pay the bills. Carried. Schools at ~AFTA were discussed: ,rookie and advanced, firefighter and ~escue certification wsre discussed. The gas company demonstration day was discussed. At the next meeting,there will be a discussion concerning getting rid of the bus. *'~mber cities not represented at this meeting were: Long Lake, St. Bonifacius, Watertown. Next meeting will be November 19 at 7:30 at the 'dAFTA site. Rs spe ctfully submitted, John A. McCoy Secretary-treasurer AGENDA Minnehaha Creek Watershed District November 20, 1980 Wayzata City Hall 7:30 p.m. e Call to order; present, absent, staff. Reading and approval of minutes of regular meeting, October 16, 1980. Approval or amendment of November 20, 1980, agenda. Hearing of permit applications. ne 76--9. Minnetonka Jaycees and City of Minnetonka - renewal of a permit to excavate a pond in the wetlands of Big Willow Park, Minnetonka. Be 77-139. Victoria Commercial Developers, Inc. - renewal of a grading/drainage permit for "Victoria Commercial Development 2nd Addition," Victoria. Ce 78-132. Centurian Co. - renewal of a fill permit, "Cimarron Ponds," east shore of Gleason Lake, Plymouth. De 79-96. Hoben Properties - renewal of grading/drainage permit for "Hollybrook," Wayzata. 80-74. City of Orono - placement of sanitary sewer: Minnetonka Bluffs, Ferndale Road, County Road 15, and North Shore Drive and 20 lineal feet of storm sewer across Russell Street, Orono. Fo 80-99. City of Long Lake - placement of 800 lineal feet df sanitary sewer, Long Lake. Ge 80-100. R. Speeter & J. Henninger - after-the-fact review of shoreline rip-rap and removal of a culvert, 659 Minnetonka Highland Lane, North Arm-Lake Minnetonka, Orono. He 80-101. Keller Investment - grading/drainage for "Greenbrier III," east of County Road 73 and South of Greenbrier Road, Minnetonka. 80-102. K. Sherman - rip-rap, 5065 Wren Road, Harrison~ Bay-Lake Minnetonka, Mound. Je Ke 8~ Zejdlik - setback variance for a double bungalow, 4349 Shoreline Drive, Spring Park. 80-104. Widmer Bros., Inc. - grading/drainage for an 8.1 acre commercial/residential development, South of County Road 15 and west of Kings Road, Spring Park. o 80-105. McDonald's Corporation - grading/drainage for a restaurant, north of County Road 15, west of County Road No. 125, Spr~ng Park. 80-106. T. Vickerman - rip-rap 679 Minnetonka Highland Lane, North Arm-Lake Minnetonka, Orono. Ne 80-107. Benson Orth Associates, Inc. - grading/ drainage for "Westridge Office Center," south of U.S. Highway 12, west of Fairfield Road, Minnetonka. Correspondence. Hearing of requests for petitions by public for action by the Watershed District. Reports of Treasurer, Engineer and Attorney. Treasurer's Report - Mr. Russell (1) Administrative Fund Report (2) Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project Fund Report Be Engineer's Report - Mr. Panzer (1) Engineer's memorandum dated October 24, 1980: Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project, dredging near West 44th Street, Edina (2) Engineer' s memorandum dated November 7, 1980: Upper Watershed Improvement Project, Painter Creek Proposal-Revised October 22, 1980 (3) Hydrologic Observation and Operation Plan Proposal October, 1980 (4) October, 1980, Monthly flow summary (5) Minnehaha Creek Improvement Project Final Payment Request - Acton Construction Company (6) Waterway Maintenance and Repair Fund Allocation City of Minnetonka Beach, shoreline rip-rap - Lafayette Bay (7) Operation and Maintenance Agreement, Gray's Bay Headwaters Control Structure Ce Attorney' s Report - Mr. Macomber (1) Luggage & Leather, apparent permit violation (2) Recordation of permits Unfinished Business.~ Bridge Obstruction at 11907 Cedar Lake Road District Regulation Revision Galpin Lake Storm Drainage Improvement Project New Business. 10. Adjournment. MINUTE9 0P THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT October 16, 1980 The regular meeting of October 16, 1980, was called to order by Chairman Cochran at 7:30 p.m. at the Wayzata City Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota. Managers Present: Cochran, Gudmundson, Lehman and Russell Manager Thomas arrived at 8:00 p.m. Also present were board advisors Panzer, Fretheim and Peterson. Approval of Minutes. The minutes of the regular meeting of September 18, I980, were reviewed. It was noted that there was some confu- sion regarding the discussion of the temporary by-pass around Highway 7 on the bottom of page 3. The managers requested that the application number be included and that the minutes reflect that two 10 x 10 box culverts were to be placed in the creek and that these culverts were merely to be a temporary by-pass around Highway 7 during construction. The managers asked that this section be retyped with the correction and distributed with the minutes from this month's meeting. The managers also noted that the discussion of the preliminary plan for weed control at the Gray's Bay Control Structure on p. 8 should reflect their consensus that only if the first year of harvesting proved effective would any more be done. Following discussion, it was moved by Russell, seconded by Gudmundson, that the minutes as amended be approved. Upon vote the motion carried. Approval of Permit Applications. The managers reviewed a written memorandum from the engineers dated October 9, 1980, summarizing the nature of the following applications, indicating that they comply with the applicable standards of the District, and recommending approval on the terms and conditions as set forth in the engineer's written memorandum: McNulty Construction Co. - extension of a grading/drainage permit for "Amesbury," Deephaven. 77-57. Page 5047 Wren Road, Harrison Bay-Lake Minnetonka, Mound. 80-83. E. Wells - rip-rap, 5440 Ridgewood Cove, Jennings Bay-Lake Minnetonka, Minnetrista. 80-86. City of Minnetonka - installation of a .watermain to connect "Pump House No. 10" with city a city well, Minnetonka. 80-88. J. Stone - rip-rap, 1535 Bohns Point Road, Crystal Bay-Lake Minnetonka, Orono. 80-90. D. Dunlap - rip-rap, 1595 Bohns Point Road, Crystal Bay-Lake Minnetonka, Orono. 80-93. Seton Village Townhouses - rip-rap, 4760 West Arm Road, West Arm-Lake Minnetonka, Spring Park. 80-96. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, that the above permits be approved and issued subject to all terms and conditions recommended by the engineer. Upon vote the motion carried. Minnesota Department of Transportation - Bridse Replacement, ~.H. 7 over Minnehaha Creek~ Hopkins and St. LoUis Park. 80-54. ' John Boynton was present to discuss this application with the Board of Managers. The engineer reviewed this appli- cation for approval of construction of Minnesota Department of Transportation Bridge No. 27193, T.H. 7 at Minnehaha Creek in Hopkins and St. Louis Park. The project includes the con- struction of a temporary by-pass for T.H. 7. The engineer indicated that the managers reviewed this application at last month's meeting and gave preliminary approval so that the Department could proceed with design. The Department was requesting final approval of the project this evening. The engineer indicated that the Department's calculations indicated that there would be no increase to the 100 year water level as a result of the project. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, that the application be approved subject to the engineer's recommendations. Upon vote the motion carried. The managers also directed the engineer to monitor water levels upstream and downstream at the temporary by-pass in the event that high creek flows occurred during con- struction of the project. PaEe 4 The managers noted that the increase of only 1.5 cfs was relatively small and, therefore, would not be a problem. They also believed that the quality of the water would not be adversely affected by waiving the storage requirement because the runoff would drain through approximately 300 feet of dense vegetation before it entered Tanager Lake. The managers did request, however, that the applicant immediately sod the developed area after its disturbance to provide immediate erosion control. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the application be approved subject to the requirement of immediate erosion control measures.  on carried. W. Johnson - Setback Variance, Lot 4. Block 2 "Highland Shores", ~Priest BaT-Lak~nnetonka, Mound. ~0-gT. ~- _.~m~'-. & Mrs. Johnson were present to discuss this set- back variance request with the Board of Managers. The engineer reviewed the application, noting that it requests a setback of 29 feet from the shoreline. The City of Mound's setback regulations require that the setback conform with existing surrounding setbacks. Because the request does conform with the existing buildings in that area, no action by the City of Mound is required. The engineer noted that this was the last lot in the area to be developed and that there was really no other way to build a house on that particular lot. The managers also discussed the height of the proposed basement level and indicated that a condition would be required that the house be built two feet above the regional flood level; in other words, that the lowest level of the basement would have to be at an elevation of 931.5. The managers also re- quired that the house must be connected to the City sewer system. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the application for the setback variance be approved subject to the conditions noted above. Upon vote the motion carried. D. Maiser - Grading/Drainage Review of a Parking Lot, 15119 Minnetonka Boulevard~ Minnetonka. 80-94. Jack Dial appeared on behalf of the applicant. The engineer reviewed this application for a grading and drainage permit for the construction of an 8-stall parking lot in the City of Minnetonka. An existing residential building is being converted to an office building requiring that the parking area be expanded. It was noted that the homes across the street are also being converted to commercial uses. The engineer noted that the stormwater storage area is oversized for the parking lot and will easily handle the runoff from that area. The application proposes to utilize a filter berm for maintaining the quality of the stormwater runoff. The managers added the additional condition that the existing '68-0~ · ~uoqouu~x 'K~;~ uao~qao~ uoq~u~an~ o~q $o ~q~oN pu~ p~o~ Kqsoa0 Jo qgaM - au~ ~uII~P¥ 'qua~doI~A~G I~quap~s~ ~aov E'~ u~ jo ~atAaM oM~ut~aG/MuIP~aO - 'ouI 'quamdolaA@~ eqqoqs 'OU ~UIqOA uospunmPnO gqla polaa~o uolqom ogq OqOA uodfl -poAoadd~ oq uoIq~oIIdd~ oqq q~gq 'u~mqo% fq popuooo~ ¢II~ggn~ fq ponom s~a ql CuoIggnogIp MulaoIIog · suoIq~o~Idd~ ~s~gq $o ~IAOa aO$ go~oadd~ quoqsIsuoo ~ doIoAop oq '~oa~ u~qIIodoaqom oqq uI fIa~Inotqa~d 'sqolaqgIp poqs -aoq~ aogqo gqI~ ~ao~ ~ogq q~qq ~ao~eu~ ogq jo ~n~uasuoo oyq si qI -uolq~iadoadd~ aoq~punoaM jo aoinoa ao$ ~IaoqIao pu~ gouIIoPInM quoqglguoo omog ao$ poou oqq posgnoglp gaaM~u~m otk~ 'IIo~ oqq $o MutMMIP oqq ao$ ~aoM~u~ arq fq poqu~aM uooq ~p~oaI~ p~g ~I~aod ~ q~g~ poqou aaouI~uo o~ 'E 'ON IIo~ ~qI0 ~oa$ ao~punoaM jo uoi~iadoadd~ oq~ ao$ Ma~ Mulads jo f~IO ogq moaS uoIq~oIIdd~ ~Igq po~oIAoa aoouI~uo otLL 'E~-O~ .Ma~ Mulads '[ 'ON IIOM KqI0 'uotq~Iadoaddv aoq~xpunoao - Ma~d MuIadS jo KqI0 Page 7 a fairly isolated position on a point with only one adjacent home· The managers expressed the consensus to defer to the City of Mound on this particular matter. Following discussion, it was moved by Thom~_aeao]3ded by Russell, that the applica- tio~be approvedC---Opon vote the motion carried. ~ · /'"~.'~~ding/Drainage Review of a 0.72 Acre Res?~?~ Development~ $o~h of Church .Road between Fern L~n_~e an_~d.B~mont ~~ ..... ~e._enginee~viewed thiS~application fo~ a g~ading an~hage~plan f0~ development of eight townhouses on a · 72 ac~e ~esiden~ial development in the City of Mound. ~e enginee~ noted that the~e would be two pending a~eas fo~ s~o~age. He ~eco~ended approval with the following condi- tions: That final plans be submitted showing the outlets from the ponds. That these plans meet with the engineer's approval. That the outlets from the ponds be dis- charged into a City storm sewer. Following discussion, it was moved by Lehman, seconded by Russell, that the application be approved subject to the engineer's recommendations. Upon vote the motion carried. Treasurer's Report The treasurer distributed the monthly Administrative Fund Report dated October 16, 1980, a copy of which is attached. Following discussion, it was moved by Thomas, seconded by Gudmundson, that the Administrative Fund Report be approved and the bills paid as set forth therein. Upon vote the motion carried. The treasurer then distributed the monthly Minnehaha C~eek Improvement Project Fund Report dated October 16, 1980. It was noted that a request for partial payment #8 had been received from Acton Construction Company for the amount of $69,372.12. It was noted that there was an insufficient balance to pay this bill. Therefore, it was moved by Gudmundson, seconded by Lehman, that the Report be approved, that $40,000.00 be borrowed from the Maintenance and Repair Fund, that $16,372.12 be borrowed from the Administrative Fund, and that those funds, in conjunction with the $13,000.00 balance in the Improvement Fund'be utilized to pay the partial payment #8 to the Acton Contruction Company. These amounts would be repaid to those funds upon receipt of sufficient tax settlements for the Improvement Project Fund. Upon vote the motion carried. .1.-5'77 ): ~.OM: JBJECT: Leonard Kopp DATE October '22 Public Works Director Dates for Trash Pick-up 19.80 As requested by the Mayor our Spring pick-up dates in 1980 were MaY 20 to May 23. If we want to set tentative dates for 1981 I would suggest.we stay with the scheduling we used this year. That would place the Spring pick-up the third week of May and the Fall pick-up the first week of November. Re~ctfully, Robert Shanley r Public Works Director RS/j cn · . / MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND INCOME STATEMENT 1980 Sept. 1980 1979 CC~lle Off Sale Dense Cost of Goods Sold Current Y-T-D $58,223 $560,101 44,832 431,278 GROSS PROFIT 13,391 128,823 Current Y-T-D $54,421 $464,968 41,904 358,O25 12,517 106,943 -.rating Expense Personal Services 5,715 53,616 Supp 1 ies 220 1,705 Prof. Services 1,550 Commu n i ca t ions 7~ 670 Insurance 860 7,740 Uti 1 i ties 1,390 4,052 Repair & Maint. 1,163 Rent 675 6,478 Other Contr Serv. 2:62/~ . . 3,806 Depreciation 380 3,420 Ot he r 138 676 Subtotal 12,074 84,876 OPERATING INCOME er Income Interest Refunds Miscellaneous Subtotal 1,317- 43,947 20) (4.,.405) 55 638 (65) (3,767) NET INCOME 1,252 40,180 4,633 43,499 2,101 130 1,170 62 668 6OO 5,4OO 353 3,658 211 1,577 675 5,677 350 3~150 175 1,742 7,189 68,642 5,328 38,301 5,328 38,301 7 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND. CITY OF MOUND BALANCE SHEET Sept. 1980 Assets Current Assets: Cash on Hand Cash in Bank & Investment Loan to General Fund Inventory Prepaid Expenses Total Current Assets Fixed Assets: Furniture Equipment Fixtures Accumulated Amortization Leasehold Improvements Accumulated Amortization Net Fixed Assets Other Assets: Total Assets 925 153,514 1,667 83,627 8,388 41,011 (35,367) 6,901 (5,ooo) 5,644 1,901 248,121 7,545 ·. · $255,666 Liabilities Accounts Payable Trade Sales Tax Payable Accrued Expenses Cash Over or Short Total Liabilities 22,201 2,209 130 (578) 23,962 Equity Fund Balance Transfers Out Net Income Retml'n~d Earnings 12/31/79 Total Equity Total tiabilities & Euqity 172,924 (86,837) 40,180 105,437 231,704 $255,666 ;ale of Goods Sold MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND INCOME STATEMENT 1980 Current Y-T-D $63,297 $623,398 48,739 480,O17 Oct. 1980 1979 ;ROSS PROFIT 14,558 143,381 Current Y-T-D ng Expense ;onal Services ~lies Services ~unications irance lities ~ir & Maint. ;r Contr Serv. 'eci ati on :r Subtotal 5,961 59,577 64 . 1,769 I ,55o 84 754 7,740 34 4,o86 138 1,3Ol 675 7,153 (2,302) 1,5o4 38O 3,800 1,.099 1,775 6,133 91,OO9 iPERATING INCOME 8,425. 52,372 ncome rest nds (329) (4,734) el laneous (23) 615 Subtotal (352) (4,119) ET INCOME 8,073 48,253 $54,572 42,020 12,552 5~262 234 79O $519,540 400,045 119,495 48,761 2:33S 1,96o 62 730 600 6,000 353 4,011 9 1,586 675 6,352 350 3,500 183 1,925 8,518 77,160 4,034 42,335 4,034 42,335 HUNICIPAL LIQUOR CI1¥ OF MOUND BALANCE SHEET FUND Oct. 1980 Assets Current Assets: Cash on Hand Cash in Bank & Loan to General Inventory Prepaid Expenses Investment Fund Total Current Assets Fixed Assets: Furniture Equipment Fixtures Accumulated Amortization Leasehold Improvements Accumulated Amortization Net Fixed Assets Other Assets: Total Assets 925 150,410 1,667 99,284 9,049 41,Oll (35,517) 6,901 (5,1oo) 5,494 1,801 $261,335 7,295 $268,630 Liabilities Accounts Payable Trade Sales Tax Payable Accrued Expenses Cash Over or Short Total Liabilities 28,435 2,409 130 (621) $30,353 Equity Fund Balance Transfers Out Net Income Retained. Earnings 12/31/79 Total Equity 172,O24 '(88,337) 48,253 105,437 238,277 Total Liabilities & Euqity $268.630 _ CITY All Citie POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT MONTH October, YEAR 1980 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR ~CTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 158 3,140 - Hazardous Warnings 50 203 - Non-hazardous Citations 149 976 4,229 Non-hazardous Warnings 100 500 - Parking Citations 55 687 - DWI 16 139 68 Over .10 BAC 13 83 - Property Damage Accidents 8 163 230 Personal Injury Accidents 2 60 56 Fatal Accidents 0 1 3 , Adult Felony Arrests 2 112 175 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 21 181 - Juvenile Felony Arrests 5 83 174 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 5 45 Part I Offenses 42 749 952 Part II Offenses 50 397 - Medicals 24 281 208 Animal Complaints 4~ 942 1,491 Other General Investigations 1~927 11,759 8,270 TOTAL 1,724 20,501 15,856 combined with symbol of same type up thru April 1980 III. OFFENSE ACTIVIT~UMMARY PART I CRIMES Homicide Rape Robbery A s s ault Burglary La rc eny Vehicle Theft Arson TOTA L All Cities O~ D 0 u ~ Felonies Misdemeanor Adult Juv. Adult Juv. 29 29 2 3 :PART II CRIMES S.imple Assault Ji 1 ' 1 Forgery & Counterfeiting Fraud 3 3 1 Embezzlement Stolen Property Vandalism 16 16 2 I 1 Weapons ......... Prostitution & Commercialized Vice Sex Offenses Narcotic drug .laws 1 1 l Gambling [ I 1 Offens es., against farnily_& children Driving under the influence 16 16 16 Liquor Laws ' 2 2 ..... i 1 Public Peace 9 9 3. 2 All other offenses 2 2 12 TOTAL [0 50 6 33 6 TOTAL PART I & PART II CRIMES 192 192 6 2 8 33 6 PROPERTY LOSS/R iOVERY SUMMARY All Cities ITEM ;~kes ts rrency, notes~ etc. Jewelry & precious metals ~unS ome Furnishings ~dio & Electron~ic equipment Vehicle's & vehicle equipment cellaneous TO TA L STOLEN 100 7,825 1,750 1,320 150 3,832 13,992 3,153 3'2,122 RECOVERED 280 551 20 2,000 650 3,501 t 2x71 CI TA TIONS Adult Juv. DWI or OUI 16 More than . 10 % BAG 13 Careless Driving Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. 6 Open Bottle 8 Speeding 124 12 No DL or Expired DL 4 2 Restriction on DL 2 Improper, Expired, or no plates Illegal Passing Unsafe Passing Stop Sign violations Failure to Yield Illegal Equipment 20 1 Unsafe.Equipment H & R Leaving the scene Illegal or improper lane usage Illegal or unsafe turn Over the center line Illegal Parking 57 Overtime Pa rking Dog ordinances 3 Derelict autos Miscellaneous .tags 7 1 TOTALS { )72 , 18, WARNINGS Traffic 50 ;4 Equipment 87 8 Animals Trash ] Other 1/4 TOTAL I 152 1 POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT CITY Mound MONTH October, YEAR 1980 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR ACTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 98 1,920 ~- ~ Haza rd cus Warnings 33 113 ~ Non-hazardous Citations 92 463 2,500 Non-hazardous Warnings 61 286 - Parking Citations 39 3~3 , - DWI 11 75 39 Over .10 BAC 9 45 - Property Damage Accidents 2 76 114 Personal Injury Accidents 1 27 25 Fatal Accidents 0 0 1 Adult Felony Arrests 2 69 109 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 14 103 - Juvenile Felony Arrests 2 55 120 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 5 34 - Part I Offenses 24 459 607 o Part II Offenses 36 262 - Medicals 18 171 137 Animal Complaints 25 650 1,094 Other General Investigations 730 8,024 5,192 TOTAL 1,202 13,195 9,938 -!- ,-~.~ ~ O combined with symbol of same type up thru April 1980 III. OFFY'.NSE AC TIVIT~UMMAR PART I CRIMES Homicide ,Rape Robbery A s s ault Burglary Larceny Vehicle Theft Arson TOTAL Y 18 2 2 Pi i sdemean 'PART II CRIMES S.impl e Assault Forgery & Counterfeiting Fraud Embezzlement Stolen Property Vandalism Weapons Prostitution & Commercialized Vice Sex Offenses Narcotic drug laws Gambling Offenses against family & children Driving under the influence Liquor Laws Public Peace All other offenses TOTAL 1 ! 12 2 1 11 1 $ 1 2 36 [ 4 TOTAL PART I & PART II CRIMES 160 4 2 ound P~ROPER T¥ LOSS/RECO' SUMMARY Bikes ITEM Boats Clothing Currency, notes, etc. Iewelry & precious metals ~uns dome Furnishings Radio & Electronic equipment ;ehicles & vehicle equipment Miscellaneous ['OTAL (for individual city) ;RAND TOTAL (ail cities combined) STOLEN 100 7,825 163 900 2,829 8,917 436 22,170 32,122 RECOVERED 80 551 2O 2,000 350 3,001 3,5°1 , Cily Hound Month 0ctobe 19 8O CI TA TIONS Adult Juv. DWI or OUI lviore than .10 % BAC Careless Driving Reckless Driving Driving After Susp. or Rev. 3 Open Bottle Speeding 79 No DL or Expired DL 4 Restriction on DL 2 Improper, Expired, or no plates 62 Illegal Passing 2 Unsafe Passing Stop Sign violations 2 Failure to Yield 2 Illegal Equipment 2 Unsafe Equipment 7 H & R Leaving the scene Illegal or improper lane usage Illegal or unsafe t~arn Over the center line Illegal Parking 40 Overtime Pa rking Dog ordinances 5 241 Derelict autos Miscellaneous ta~s I1 TO TA LS WARNINGS Traffic 31 Equipment 59 Animals Trash 1 6 Other 10 TOTAL 1 10 ~OLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT CIIY MINNETRISTA MONTH October YEAR 1980 GENERAL ACTiViTY SUMMARY THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR /~CT I V I TY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE + Hazardous Citations 14 281 - ~t- Hazardcus Warnings 5 21 - -i- Non-hazardous Citations 11 77 276 + Non-hazardous Warnings 5 31 - -~ Parking Citations 2 89 - ~- DWI 1 88 12 -~ 0ver .10 BAC 1 15 - Property Damage,. Accidents 4 . , 43 52 ", Personal Injury Accidents 0 17 16 Fatal Accidents 0 0 1 ~ Adult Felony Arrests 0 8 25 :;z Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 3 24 - -- Juvenile Felony Arrests 3 17 19 -- Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 0 9 - o Part I Offenses 8 120 146 o Part II Offenses 4 45 - Med icals 2 38 31 t Animal Complaints 20 193 269 Other General Investigations 153 1,514 1,154 TOTAL 238 2,552 2,001 -I- ,_~t~.~ __ O combined with symbol or same type up thru April 1980 ~L~--~' CITY St. POLICE/CRIHE ACTIVITY REPORT :ius MONTH October~ YEAR I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR /~,'1' I V I TY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 6 159 - Haza rd cus Warnings O 3 - Non-hazardous Citations 6 29 159 Non-hazardous Warnings 0 l0 - Parking Citations 2 14 - DWI 1 7 4 Over .10 BAC 1 4 - Property Damage Accidents i l0 18 Personal Injury Accidents 1 5 6 Fatal Accidents 0 1 0 Adult Felony Arrests 0 4 5 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 1 9 - Juvenile Felony Arrests 0 2 7 Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 0 2 - I Part I Offenses 5 38 38 ',,' 1 Part II Offenses 2 21 .- Med i ca 1 s 1 11 8 Animal Complaints 0 12 21 Other General Investigations 24 323 281 TOTAL 51 664 547 combined with symbol of same type up thru April 1980 POLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT CItY Spring Park MONTH October ~ YEAR 1980 I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR /~TIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE Hazardous Citations 40 780 Hazardous Warnings 12 66 - Non-hazardous Citations 40 407 1,294 Non-hazardous Warnings 34 173 - Parking Citations 12 221 - DWI 2 41 13 Over .10 BAC 1 25 - Property Damage Accidents 1 34 46 Personal Injury Accidents O il 9 Fatal Accidents O 0 1 Adult Felony Arrests 0 31 36 Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 3 45 - Juvenile Felony Arrests Arrests 0 9 28 _I Juvenile Misdemeanor O 0 - _' Part I Offenses 5 132 161 Part II Offenses 8 69 - Medicals 3 61 32 Animal Complaints 2 87 107 Other General Investigations '120 1,898 1,643 TOTAL 283 4,090 3,370 -I- ,-~j~,~,--. O combined with symbol of same type up thru April 1980 SW3~V~N 3NOHH 33WJ - 9901 S,NOINN NW31S3AA WOJ 3~1S 3SW3A3W 33S 'V~W~91~7~ A8 AgH3W Ol A~3 ~0~0 ~0~33~I0 ~A93~33NI$ ONV M3IA~ ~NV 9NIS~3OO~d ~£~NS 3NOO~30N~ 3A?H 99I~ O3£NI~d 3HZ N! NMOH~ 3~ 01 ~£N~O0 9VNIJ 3W~ '~IN~OO 9~NIJ AB ~3/~9 O3ovgd3~ 3B 99IM HDIHM ~/gN~ A~¥NINI93~d 3~V 353H1 ~I £NflO0 9NI~NOH A~VNZHI93~d 3HI QNV ~26 ~I ZNNO3 NOIl~gNdOd A~VNIHIq3~d 3HI '03139dN03 N33B 3^¥N NOIIOIO$IBN? BNOA ~OJ SNOI£~H3~O 093I~ ~Hl '~NSN33 9~INN3330 096I 3Hi NOIl~3dOO3 BNOA BOJ NOA g~N~Hl SN~N3O 3H£ JO N¥3~NB ~gVlOIJJO 9~309 9NSN~3 3HI JO N~3~NB 1980 BUDGET REPORT ~ct°be___I~ ~ )EPARTMENT BUDGETED CURRENT EXP. Y-T-D EXP. ALLOWED ACTUAL )2011 COUNCIL $ ]9,065.00 $289.03 $31,50o.86 $15,881.15 1.6520 )3012 HUMAN RIGHTS 450.00 --- 37.47 374.85 .0930 )4013 MANAGER 90.208.00 3,754.94 69,638.96 75,143.26 .7720 )6014 ELECTIONS 6,490.00 576.06 3,382.36 5,406.17 .5210 )7015 ASSESSING 34,050.00 21.00 32,975.01 28,363.65 .9680 )9016 FINANCE 106,796.00 7,205.48 87,382.38 88,961.07 .8180 lO18 LEGAL 14,000.00 1,166.67 11,666.70 11,662.00 .8330 1118 PROSECUTING ii,275.00 450.00 9,746.00 9,392.08 .86~t0 4031 POLICE 522,699.00 ~0,327.58 469,211.35 435,408.27 .8490 7032 FIRE 115,920.00 7,756,71 76,504.04 96,561.36 .6600 9033 INSPECTIONS 31,944.00 2,927.24 31,722.27 26,609.35 .9930 9933 PLANNING 13,655.00 1,782.53 17,947.70 11,374.62 1.3140- 1034 CIVIL DEFENSE 9,045.00 128.70 1,869.90 7,534.49 .207~ 8042 STREET 253,585.00 21,116.48 243,764.10 211,236.31 .9610 9743 SHOP & STORE 37,295.00 3,061.02 26,226.72 31,066.74 .7030 5847 DISEASED TREES 49,015.00 5,935.34 56,964.68 40,829.50 1.1620 4069 PARKS 74,725.00 8,764.83 69,815.03 62,245.93 .9340 0082 TEMPORARY LABOR 4,000.00 --- 5,217.60 3,332.00 1.3040 5091 LIQUOR 181,]38.00 15,232.52 136,116.98 150,887.95 .7520 0078 SEWER 390,325.00 23,958.39 273,112.88 325,140.73 .7000 Di73 WATER 250,667.00 ~17,015.67 221,176.71 208,805.61 .8820 B IMP EQUIP OUTLAY 100,670.00 --- 44,727.50 83,858.11 .4440 ~ CEMETERY 3,350.00 --- 992.98 2,790.55 .2960 2 RETIREMENT 75,518.00 8,674.89 66,204.28 62,906.49 .8770 ~ FIRE RELIEF 46,306.00 --- 9,780,24 38,572,90 .2110 5 WATER REVENUE 37,136.00 --- 37,264.30 30,934.29 1.0040 3 CONTINGENCY 20,000.00 ...... 16,660.00 .0000 TOTALS 2,499,327.00 170,145.08 2,034,949.00 2~081~939.43 .8140 November 14, 1980 Mr. Leroy J. Fluck 4954 Brunswick Road RR Mound, MN. 55364 Dear Mr. Fluck: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of November 12, 1980 wherein you advise that you have not prepaid your assessment because you feel the work on the street project is not completed to your satis- faction. I am not able to forgive interest on special assessments since the dates by which they are to be paid is set by the City Council and State Law. I will pass your letter on to the City Council and when your assessment is prepaid, we will take the case to the Council on whether or not the interest is due. A few minutes ago, t talked to the Engineer and he says that there is a little sod work left to be done which he has been trying to get done for you while you are at home and will try again to get the people there. With regard to the interest due on the assessment: The assessment could have been prepaid without interest through November 6, 1980. After November 6th, interest was due and payable through December 31, 1980 as long as the assessment was prepaid before November 10, 1980. After November lO, 1980, interest is due and payable through December 31, 1981. The 1981 payment with interest will appear on your tax statement. So it will be necessary for the City Council to determine whether or not they w.~sh to refund your interest. I do hope that they finish the small amount of work left on your property within the next few days. Yours very truly, d L. Kopp '' C~ty Manager LLK/ms cc: City Council City Attorney ~nqineer l~.ovemoer 12,1380 city I.i ana.~e r Mound, r.iI ~N. Dear Sir: In regard to assessments on property PID 24-117-24-410148, ;.~hy hasn,t the city Clerk Treas., been notified of a deferred payment, without interest on this a~sessment. As you well know or have you ever inquired if the job was done .n our property? After numerous calls to Lyle s:~anson, Gordy S~enson, Mayor, City Manager and Christenson, Cameroa, and also some Fred~ the drive- ~ay and retaining :.~all ~.~as finished but landscaping and so~ding have not yet been finished. Have made numerous calls to abo~e 2~entlmen again about the completion of job, they all promised work would be done yet this fall, but as of today its still undone. Therefore we are holding our payment in full for as::essmenms until ~.zork is completed and also ~,:ith understanding '..:e are paying no interest, as this ~as suppose to have been taken up or referred to Cit~~ Clerk Treas. as early as August 29, 19~0. Also ~.~e stated our oral objecti..~ns to our aszessments on sep. 23, because our la~:n and landscaping not com')leted, nor :~a= re~aining -...~all and drive~-ay at th~.t time but ::ere told at meeting job '..:~a!d be c..n'}ie'~.ed in t~,'o ~:eek~, since meeti",~ drive~.:a; and :.:ail ..'as co..' .ieted. but n~t l'z r. a2~d l~_.~ca.'..~ing Have ma~.de call to smae above zenI~men last t:~o ::eeks and still no results. ...~ith completion of the ?,,ork %.~e ~.:ill have a chec!: in full t~yment for assessment only, no interest. As you well kno~ these complaints have been brought to your attention since Oct,, 1979, by m~_uy telephone calls, council meetings, oral objections, ~ ;~ell ~s regirotered letters to your office as ~:ell Mccrum & Knutson. Also ~.~ill be un to your office to see that this is not put on our personal property tax, as :~e have said ::e ~ill pay in full as soon as the %.~ork is completed. Please take care of this matter , promptly :.~ith the City Clerk Treas. Respectfully, LeRoy J. & Audrey Pluck ., ,.,, . ~.: . , LAND TITLE SUMMONS SUBSEQUENT TO TAX FORFEITURE No. A-19652 STATE OF MINNESOTA, ) County of Hennepin. ) DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIALDLSTRICT - In the matter of the petition of Margaret M; King for a New Certificate of Title to the following described real estate situated in Hennepin County, Min- nesota, namely: Lots 4 ~and 27, except the East Half thereof, Lotz $ and 26, Block 12, Avalon 'Petitioner. Good Shepherd Lutheran Church, Ebenezer Center for Aging and Human Development, Arville Griffen Groom, Sylvia Bolin Gillespie, Mound Evangelical Free ~ Church, City of Mound, Melvie J. : Angle, Dorothy J. Sander, Jeanne Kelley Nardinger, Douglas A. ~ ' Kelly, Richard Arthur~ Kelly, Sheldon Reno Angle, the unknown - heirs of Ray Angle, deceased, also all heirs and devisees of any of the above named persons who are deceased; and all other persons or * parties - unknown, ' claiming any right, title, estate,iien or interest in the real estate described in the · application or amendments herein. " Defendants. ' !THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO THE · ABOVE NAMED' DEFENDANTS: You are hereby, summoned and required to answer the petition of the petitioner in the above entitled proceeding and to file your answer the said petition in the office of the Clerk of said Court, in said county, within days after service of this Summons upon you exclusive of the day of such service, and if you fail to answer the petition within the time aforesaid,' the petitioner in this proceeding 'will apply to the Court for the relief demanded therein. WITNESS, District Courl 'Administrator/Clerk of said Court, and 'the seal thereof, at MinneapOlis in said :County this 19th day of August, 1980. - By B. A. BORCHERT, Deputy. ~THOMAS, KLNG, SWENSON, COLLATZ & RYAN, P.A. ' ~ Attorneys for Petitioner ll00 Pioneer Building, St. Paul, Mn. 5~101_ ~, '. i~:..' .' 6396 . "' ;--'-/'" ~'t ;': " ~ ~ '" Telepl~one 473-7357 " CITYof ORONO ~ ~ Post Office Box 66 · Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 · Municipal Offices On the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka November 10, 1980 Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, Minnesota 55364 Dear Mr. Kopp: Thank you for providing the City of Orono the opportunity to review and comment on your proposed comprehensive plan. Mound's plan appears to be consistent with Orono's planning objectives. We support and encourage redevelopment of your downtown area. Mound has always been one of several commercial centers serving Orono residents. We see no need to change this complimentary relationship. Orono supports and encourages Mound's efforts at improved environmental protection. As development matures, there is ever more need to protect and preserve the natural drainageways, flood plains and wetlands from unnecessary encroachments. We feel that all lake-area communities must continue to apply high standards if Lake Minnetonka's environmental and recreational assets are to be maintained. We are encouraged by your planning statements concerning County Road 15. We too believe that it is overloaded with too much traffic and that improvements need be made in controlling development, traffic generation and curb cuts. We support implementation of your downtown bypass plan. Orono, of course, opposes widening of County Road 15 along Lake Minnetonka. Instead, we believe that efforts should be made to improve alternate routes for through traffic that need not go through the center of the Lake. Already, Orono's ring route segment opened this last spring has decreased driving time from Mound to Wayzata by almost 10 minutes as compared to County Road 15. Orono feels strongly that improved "ring routes", combined with local safety and intersection improvements, will do more to alleviate traffic concerns on a long-term basis than is possible by simply widening the road and funneling more traffic into the already congested area. We will work together with Mound to achieve the common goal of traffic flow improvement. We transmitted a copy of Orono's Community Management Plan to Mound on June 20, 1980. We would appreciate your review and comments at the earliest possible date. W~il~an~es~Sincerely' Mayor ~ M~tro ~quar~ ~uilding, 7th Stre~ and ~b~r~ ~r~, ~aint Paul, ~iaa~so~a 55101 Ar~a 612, 291-6~9 November 7, 1980 TO: Metropolitan Area Local Officials SUBJECT: Public Hearing on Revisions to Housing Policy 39 Evaluation Criteria The Metropolitan Council will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. December 11 in the Council offices to hear reaction to revisions proposed in the criteria the Council uses to evaluate a community' housing performance when implementing Policy 39 of the Housing chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guider Under Policy'39, local housing performance is a factor used in ranking local grant applications for a wide variety of state and federal grant programs.. Enclosed for your convenience is a copy of the suggested revisions and a copy of the current criteria for comparison purposes. The revisions incorporate suggestions made by local units of government who reviewed a draft of the criteria in October, You are encouraged to attend the hearing and offer co~ents on the criteria. Written comments will also be included in the hearing record. Sincerely~~~ Charles R. Weaver, Chairman, Metropolitan Council CRW/kg Enc/one An A~ency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising: Anoka County 0 Carver County 0 Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Ramsey County 0 Scott County 0 Washington Coux~ty