81-02-24 CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
REVISED
AGENDA
Mound City Council
February 24, 1981
City Hall
7:30 P.M.
81-64 2.
81-59 3.
81-61/81-70 4.
81-66 5.
~ 81-63 7.
~ 81-62 8.
~ 81-60 9.
i0.
81-65 /81-73
81-69
81-67 11.
81-68/81-72 12.
81-71 13.
14.
15.
16.
Minutes Pg. 489-494
Public Hearing - Delinquent Utility Bills Pg. 487-488
1981 Bond Issues Pg. 482-486
Liquor Ordinance Pg. 474-481
Police Reorganization Pg. 467-473
Comments and Suggestions by Citizens Present (3 Minute Limit)
Bids - Under Floor Washing System Pg. 463-466
Revenue Sharing 1981 Pg. 462
Severance Pay Policy Pg. 461
License Renewals
A. Cigarettes Pg. 460 & 505
B. Garbage Collection Pq. 459
Downtown Redevelopment Committee Pg. 508
Reduction in Retainage Pg. 457-458 & 506-507
Bingo Permit - Mound Mohawk Jaycee Women Pg. 456
Payment of Bills
Information Memorandums/Misc. Pg. 428-455 & 496-504
Committee RepOrts
Pg. 495
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 24, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-75
SUBJECT: Preliminary Report on Street Lights on County Road l]O
Attached is a copy of the Preliminary Engineering Report on Street
Lights on County Road ]10.
Lednard L. Kopp
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
Honorable Mayor
& Members of the City Council
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Hound, Minnesota
Subject:
Mound, Minnesota
Street Lights County Road llO
Oob #5951
Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council:
As requested we submit herewith a Preliminary Engineering Report on Street
Lights on County Road 110.
If you have any questions or need further information on anything in this
report, we will be pleased to discuss this further with you at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc.
LS:J1
Enclosure
Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Eagan
printed on recycled paper
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORF
Street Lights
County Road 110
City of Mound, Minnesota
February , 1981
I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under
my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional
Engineer under the laws of t~e State of Minnesota.
2/20/81 ......... ' {.-~-".J'[('-;~.-.~.~.. ............ Minn. Reg. No. 7411
GENERAL
When County Road 110 is reconstructed this year all of the lights in the
downtown area will be moved.
Hennepin County has as part of this project the construction of new concrete
Oases and the installation of new underground wirlng. The City will be
responsible for the removal and reinstallation of the lights on the new bases.
If the City wishes to make any improvements in the lighting, it would be
most economical to do so in conjunction with the street construction.
OPTIONS
We have discusseO this proposed improvement with the Public Works Director
and have calculated estimated costs for the following three optlons.
City contracts for removal and rewiring of existing light standards.
City forces recondition and repaint light standards prior to their
being put back up.
Four standards to be purchased by City to replace existing damaged
standards.
Estimated Cost (does not include City crews cost) $7,000
Same as Option No. 1 except that all heads will be replaced with new
high sodium light heads.
Estimated Cost (does not include City crews cost) $16,700
Install complete new standards and high sodium light heads at new
locations.
Estimated Cost $30,000
Ail of the above costs are based on 23 lights.
~SSESS~ENTS
In the past new street ligmting has been 75% assessed, with the City picking
up the remaining 25% of the cost.
We assume that if Option No. 1 is selected that there would be no
assessment. Option 2 and 3 could be assessed.
If this is done the amount to be assessed for Option 2 is $12,525 ana for
Option 3 is $22,500. If this is converted to a cost per front foot the
estimated assessments would be as follows:
Option 2 -
Option 3 -
$4.17/foot
$7.50/foot
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is the opinion of the Engineer that the proposed project is feasible and
ban best be accomplished as descriOed herein.
BILLS ...... FEBRUARY 24, 1981
American Arbitration ~
Air Corem
Ametek
Burlington Northern
Baldwin Supply
Holly Bostrom
Greg Bergquist
Commissioner of Revenue
Conway Fire & Safety
Cable Tele Info Center
Downtown Idea Exchange
1st Natl Bank-St. Paul
II II II
Goodi n Co.
General Office Prod
Gerry's Plumbing
Hennepin County
Hoffman Shoe Repair
Hayden-Murphy
Hennepin Co. Sheriff's Dept
Hardrives:
Henn Co. Finance
Horticulture Ind. Conf
Wm. Hudson
Hardrives
II
Illies& Sons
League of MN Cities
LOG I S
Leslie Paper
Lyman Lumber Co.
MFOA
MN Munic Liquor Store Assn
Metro Waste Control Commiss
MacQueen Equip
McCombs Knutson
City of Mpls
Mound Locksmith
Mound Medical Clinic
Mpls Star & Trib
Jack McC~;ard & Assoc
NSP
NW Bell
No. Star Waterworks
Planning & Devel. Service
Pi tney Bowes
Prem 0 Lite Corp
P.E.R.A.
200.00
90.00
105.28
533.33
97.76
126.96
24.32
2,079.76
18.73
200.00
67.00
116,776.85
10,870.50
160.97
9.72
273.95
3.75
14.OO
86.7O
49.2O
82,056.22
161.90
44.OO
8.77
10,394.O3
46,157.68
402.62
20.00
1,660.64
106.26
26.47
197.OO
125.OO
14,987.25
77.38
1,972.O0
5O.OO
3.00
77.5O
90.10
258.94
3,340.17
60.30
193.50
1,o73.o0
26.00
7.14
227.89
Reo Raj K3finels
Scott Racek
Spring Park Car Wash
Sheriffs Dept
Standard Spring Co.
Smoke-Eater
T & T Maintenance
Unitog Rental
Uniforms Unlimited
Pete Ward
Waconia Ridgeview Hosp
Widmer Bros.
Xerox
R.L. Youngdahl & Assoc
Eagle Wine Co.
Griggs Cooper
Johnson Bros. Liquor
MN Distillers
Old Peoria
Ed Phillips & Sons
231.OO
52.48
92.50
2~.13
325.00
154.00
23.1o
266.45
78.39
4.OO
33.oo
3,908.75
586.47
5,375.O0
771.51
1,823.93
4,986.93
1,308.90
1,616.38
2,060.94
TOTAL BILLS
319,348.40
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 18, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-67
SUBJECT: Downtown Redevelopment Committee
The Mayor has recommended that a task force of eleven persons replace
the present committee established for studying the redevelopment of
downtown.
Those suggested are:
1. James Regan, Chairman
2. John Royer
tte
~ A member of the~Planning Commission to be designated by the
Planning Commission. ~
7. A person to be designated by the Lions'-Rotary-Jaycee.'s and
Woman ' s, C.1 u b.
8. A person to be designated by the Retail Council.-~
9. A person from other businesses in town·
lO. A handicapped person,~
ll. A woman designated at large.-~.~'.~,~ ~
Leonard L. Kopp ! /
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 24, 1981
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 81-36
SUBJECT: Downtown Planning
Attached is a letter from the City Planner suggesting the step by step
manner the downtown planning should follow.
CITY of IOUXD
February 23, 1981
.)
5341 MAYWOOD ROAD
MOUND, MINNES('~TA 55364
(612) 472-1155
TO:
FROM:
RE:
City Manager
City Planner
Downtown Redevelopment Planning Process
Recent conversations have indicated a need to start the downtown
planning program. To assist in this effort, I am recommending a
number of organizational points in the program initiation.
Without the proper program organization at the outset, meaningful
program outcomes are jeopardized.
The City Council as well as the Planning group must agree and be
aware of the program's specific mission, expected, outcomes,
approaches to problem solutions as well as an understanding on
the program's timetable. This recommendation is not only made
to insure local support, but equally needed to conform to the
funding requirements of HUD in the use of Planning funds under
the CDBG program. This program will help fund Mound's downtown
plan and should conform to the goals of advancing economic develop-
ment and housing in downtown Mound.
Step 1.
Step 2.
Step 3.
Formatron of Planning Group
Establishing a Planning approach:
Single purpose vs. comprehensive, etc.
Establishing a detailed work program by tests to be completed
as well as a timetable schedule.
Step 4. Securing technical assistance as needed.
Charles Riesenberg
CR/ms
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 23, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-72
SUBJECT: Addendum to Council Memorandum 81-68 - Reduction in Retainage
Attached is a copy of a letter received from the Engineer with his recom-
mendation on the subject retainage.
E-eodard L. Kopp
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
February 20, 1981
Mr. Leonard Kopp
City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Subject:
City of Mound
1979 Street Improvements
Job #4213
Dear Mr. Kopp:
Hardrives has asked for a reduction of retainage on their 1979 Street Im-
provement Project. At present, the city is witholding $116,525.45 (5%) as
retainage.
The project is essentially complete with the exception of repair items. We
have calculated the value of these at $6,500. We recommend that the retainage
be reduced to $25,000.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Lyre Swanson, P.E.
LS: sj
Minneapolis- Hutchinson - Alexandria- Eagan
printed on recycled paper
2-24-81
£1T¥ OF M0~N0
Mound, Minnesota
February 23, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-73
SUBJECT: Addendum to Council Memorandum 81-65 - Cigarette License
Renewals
We have received applications from Jude Candy and Tobacco Company of
Mound for cigarette license renewals for the following:
Burger Chef
Mound Liquor Store
Mound Legion Post 398
Hole-In-One Bake Shop & Restaurant
Brantys Restaurant
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 18, 1981
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 81-34
SUBJECT: Use of Public Buildings Committee
At the last Council meeting, the City Council directed the Mayor
to appoint a committee to study the use of Public Buildings.
The following have been or will be appointed by the Mayor:
Alan Greene
Fred Kellogg
Merry Peterson
Vern Strand
Gordon Swenson
Georgiann Daly
- Le~onard L. Kopp~ ~ !!-
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 23, 1981
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 81-35
SUBJECT: Three Points Boulevard Assessment
The Mayor has asked that the Council be informed that he has met
with some of the residents of Seahorse who were concerned about
the assessment on Seahorse.
The Engineer's letter estimating an assessment was read them. The
Council has had a copy of that letter in the past.
Alan P. Ols
GRADUATE
MONTANA STATE
UNIVERSITY
1971 B. ARCH.
ARCHITECT
STATE OF MONTANA
REG. 799
ARCHITECT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
LIC. 011926
NCARB CERTIFICATE
NO. 16422
BUILDING OFFICIAL
STATE OF'MINNESOTA
CERT. O572
BUILDING INSPECTOR
INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS
CERT. 3534
MEMBER
NORTH STAR CHAPTER
ICBO
MEMBER
AMERICAN SOCIETY
PLANNING OFFICIALS
ARCHITECT
5724 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD, MOUND, MINNESOIA 55364
February 18, 1981
Mr. Leonard Kopp, City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Re: Mound Fire Station Addition
Dear Mr. Kopp,
The contract completion date for this work was 1-16-81.
The project is substantially complete and has been
occuppied by the fire department since mid-January.
I have only had one pay request from the contractor in
October. There is still $52,651.00 remaining to be
paid per my records. The 1-5-81 punch list is complete
except for item #10, cleanout cover and item#11, ac-
ceptance of the infra red unit heaters, and minor
adjustments of the locksets.
The unit heaters are the major concern. The only in-
formation received from the manufacurer is the attached
letter which.is not a good guarantge for the City.
On-site labeling is not standard practice. As of this
date, no AGA test evaluation is available. All units
are now operating but two have had problems with fil-
ters. One unit is currently operating without a filter.
The units do heat the space satisfactorily.
The supplier, Jerry Martin of EER Products, has been
requesting approval of the heaters so that he could be
paid. I have delayed any decision because we do not
have any test data and because the general contractor
has not requested payment. We have no contract with
in, but as of 2-17-81 he has threatened legal
aotion against the City to force payment. I feel this has no
merit, but the City Attorney should be advised.
At this point, I believe the City has several options:
(1) Order removal of the substitute units and installation
of the specified brand.
(2) Take no action until receipt of AGA test data in three
or four months.
(3) Accept the units subject to guarantees from the manu-
~' facturer in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
(4) Accept the units as is.
My recommendation is Option 2 as having least risk for the
City, although Option 1 may allow the contract to be completed
sooner. Please advise as to how you wish the matter to be
handled.
Alan,. 01son
cc Lyle Swanson
Willard Weikle
Robert Cheney, Chief
297
TERMINAL AVENUE
DETROIT, MICHIGAN 48Z14
December 31, 1 980
Mr. A10lson
5274 Lynwood Blvd.
Mound MN 55364
Re: Vented Radiant Tube Heater
Dear Mr. Olson:
Per a recent conversation with our representative, Mr.
Gerry Martin of EER Products, Minneapolis, this is to advise
you that a test date for the above subject unit at the A.G.A.
Laboratories is set for February 3, 1981.
The unit utilizes an A.G.A. listed burner assembly, gas
control, and ignition system and U.L. listed blower and elec-
trical components; all have proven reliable in gas burning
appliance applications. Extensive testing at our facility and
field testing indicate that Design A.G.A. Certification on the
unit should be obtained in a normal time period after submittal.
Upon receipt of Cert.ification, A,G.A. labels will be provided
for the units already in the field in accordance with our listing
agreement with A.G.A.
The 4) DTH-20-75N units provided for the Mound fire station
should' display serial numbers of 010278-9~10~11~12. Units will
be monitored by and A.G.A. tags handled in cooperation with
O, erry Martin.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to
contact us.
PHB/nmk
Best Regards,
Paul H. Busch
Vice President, Operations
DETROIT RADIANT PRODUCTS CO.
AREA CODE (313) 823- 1074
GRADUATE
MONTANA STATE
Lu~IVERSITY
]~71 B. ARCH.
ARCHITECT
STATE OF MONTANA
REG. 799
ARCHITECT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
LIC. 011926
NCARB CERTIFICATE
NO. 16422
BUILDING OFFICIAL
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CERT. 0,572
BUILDING INSPECTOR
INTERNATIONAL
CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS
CERT. 3534
MEMBER c~
NORTH STAR CHAPTER
ICBO
MEMBER
AMERICAN SOCIETY
PLANNING OFFICIALS
E; C T
5724 LYNWOOD BOULEVARD, MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
January' ~, 1~01
612--472-4369
I~r. Willard Weikle
Earl Wei~le and Sons, Inc.
2514 24th Avenue South
Minneapolis, ~. 55406
'Alan Pf Olson,
He: Mound Fire Station Additinn--Punch List
Dear Nm. Weikle,
The .following items require correction or completion
prior to final completion of this project:
~o, 1. Tape gyp. hd. ceiling in room102.
~ 2. Insulate and cover/trim openings in ext. wall beside
2x6 on both sides of both OH doors ~ & 5 (above drs).
~_~ Seal wall joint inside, NE corner rm 101 near dr 4-
. Seal chips in wall at both ext. WP outlets.
Replace board or satisfactorily patch cracks in
cement asbestos soffit over dr ~ by elect, fixt. D.
~6. Door 8 at rm 201: install glazin ,~glue splinter~~
especilly on top; reinstall neatly ge
screws on frame - provide plugs or grind smooth.
~7. Door 6: adjust latchplate &/or deadbolt.
.~8. Rekey doors 6,?,14 all the same and provide 40 keys.
Provide 3 master keys for doors above plus door 8.
~.9. Roofing work noted in 12-11-80 punch list has not
been completed:
a) Correct all flashings for proper fastening & joints
b) Install 3 missing downspouts from'2nd flr roof
c) Install curb under existing AC unit
d) Heinstall antenna guy wire
Replace sewer cleanout in flr with flush cover type.
Infrared heaters HAVE NOT BEEN ACCEPTED yet. The
northeast unit is not operating. The supplier has
not provided any test data or'explaination from the
manufacturer as promised on 12-5-80. Satisfactory
testing results must be provided or the units replaced
with the specified brand before any payment will be made.
c~12. Conc. flr. must be cleaned where OH door stings have
dripped oil.
~.~13. Provide quote for installing double glazing in both
Architect
cc: Leonard Kopp, City Manager
Bob Cheney, Fire Chief
Lyle. Swanson, City Engineer
~/77
MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DIS
AGENDA
Regular Meeting, 8 p.m., Wednesday, February 25, 1981
TONKA BAY VILLAGE HALL
4901 Manitou Road (County Road 19), Tonka Bay
1. Movie:_ Water - A Timeless Compound
2. Call to Order
3. Roll Call
4. Minutes: January 28, 1981
5. Treasurer's Report A. Monthly Financial Report
B. Bills
6. Committee Reports
A. Water Structures & Environment Committee
(1) Public Hearing Reports: a) Windward Marine
b) Lakeview Restaurant
c) Martin & Son
d) Sailors World
e) Shorewood Yacht Club
(2) 1981 Dock License Renewals
(3) New Dock Licenses for Public Hearings
(4) Variances for Public Hearings
(5) Variance - City of Deephaven
(6) Environment
(7) Other
B. Lake Use Committee
(1) Sp. Event Permit: Dist. 21 Laser Assn.
(2) Sp. Event Permit: Great Plains Pro-Bass Assn. (5/30)
(3) Sp. Event Permit: Great Plains Pro-Bass Assn. (8/15)
(4) Tree Cuttlng Model Ordinance
(5) QW Policy Review
(6) QW Buoy Placement Criteria
(7) QW Public Hearing Reports: a) Prince
b) Bethke
c) .Sunset Dr. Petition
d) Seahorse
e) Skoglund
(8).QW Request: Rappaport
(9) Fish House Cleanup Campaign
(10) 1981 Fish Seining Program
(11) Water Patrol Report
(12) Other
7. Code Amendments A. Winter Vehicle Removal (3rd reading~
B. Commercial DUA Clarification (3rd reading)
C. Noise Testing Station (2nd reading)
Other Business
Adjournment
2-2o-81 '9' ?&
REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL
February lO, 1981
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Mound, Hennepin County, Minnesota was held at 5341Maywood Road
in said City on February 10, ]981 at 7:30 p.m.
Those present were: Mayor Rock Lindlan, Councilmembers Gordon Swenson, Robert
Polston, Pinky Charon and Donald Ulrick. Also present were City Manager Leonard
L. Kopp, City Attorney Curtis A. Pearson, Assistant City Engineer Lyle Swanson
and City Clerk Mary H. Cronin.
MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of January 20, 1981 were presented for consideration.
Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the meeting
of January 20, 1981 as submitted.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
PUBLIC HEARING - REZONING RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERICAL - LOTS 1-17 INCL., LYNWOLD
15
PARK
The Mayor then reopened the public hearing for input on said Rezoning Residential
to Commerical - Lots 1-17 Incl., Lynwold Park and persons present to do so were
afforded an opportunity to express their views thereon. The following persons
offered comments or questions: Roger Reed and Ron Roelof. The Mayor then closed
the public hearing.
Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion
ORDINANCE 409 ORDINANCE NO. 409
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 23.Oll AND 23.07 BY
REZONING CERTAIN LANDS FROM RESIDENTIAL A-1 TO
COMMERCIAL
The vote was unanimously in favor, so ordained.
Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to acknowledge the resolution adopted
by School District 277 regarding the above rezoning. The vote was unanimously in
favor.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Change of Restrictive Covenants - 3041 & 3046 Brighton Commons
Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion to table this item.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Rezoning from Residential A-! to Commercial - 2300 Driftwood
Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-44 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARD-
ING THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY AT 2300 DRIFTWOOD
TO BE HEARD ON MARCH lO, 1981 AT 7:30 P.M.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
February 10, 1981
Sign Variance - 5307 Shoreline Boulevard
Uirick moved and Charon seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-45 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE A 6
FOOT BY 32 INCH SIGN
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Side Yard, Lake & Street Front Variance - 4957 Island View Drive
Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-46 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE
ADDITION TO THE HOUSE AT 4957 ISLAND VIEW
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Side Yard & Lot Size Variance - 5543 Bartlett Blvd
Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-47 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO APPROVE THE
PROPOSED ADDITION RECOGNIZING THAT IT IS A
NONCONFORMING USE
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Sign Variance - 2361Wilshire Blvd
Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-48 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVI~G A 12
FOOT BY 3 FOOT SIGN PROVIDED IT BE ATTACHED
TO THE BUILDING
The vote was unanimously 'in favor.
Sign Variance - 5241 Shoreline Blvd
Polston moved and Charon seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-49 RESOLUTION TO CONCUR WITH THE RECOMMENDATION
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A 16
FOOT BY 4 FOOT SIGN
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Subdivision of Land - 2700 Block on Grove Lane
Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a moti. on
RESOLUTION 81-50 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING RE-
GARDING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND ON THE 2700
BLOCK ON GROVE LANE TO BE HEARD ON MARCH 10,
1981 AT 7:30 P.M.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
February 10, 1981
STREET CONSTRUCTION
Preliminary Report - COUNTY ROAD 110
Polston moved and Charon seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-51 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PRELIHINARY REPORT
AND PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING
ASSESSMENTS ON IHPROVEHENTS OF COUNTY ROAD
110 TO BE HEARD ON HARCH 24, 1981 AT 7:30 P.H.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Watermains - County Road 110
Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-52 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE ENGINEER TO PREPARE
PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS FOR A 10" WATERMAIN
FROM LYNWOOD BOULEVARD TO AUDITORS ROAD
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Ulrick moved and Polston seconded a motion to reduce retainage to 5% provided
that the contract was signed after July 1, 1980 and all other criteria stipu-
lated by the law are met.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
INSURANCE
Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-53 RESOLUTION AWARDING THE UNDERWRITING OF THE
CITY'S INSURANCE COVERAGE BY R. L. YOUNGDAHL
& ASSOC. FOR $80,383.00
Roll call vote was three in favor with Polston & Lindlan voting nay.
CEMETERY LOT 24, GRAVES 7 & 8, DIVISION A
Swenson moved and Polston seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-54 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PLACEMENT OF A GRAVE
IN THE WALKWAY ABUTTING GRAVE 8 OF LOT 24,
DIVISION A
The vote was unanimously in favor.
FIRE RELIEF 2% INSURANCE FUND
UIrick moved and Polston seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-55 RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO ANY PROPOSAL FOR
REALLOCATION OF THE 2% FIRE, LIGHTNING,
SPRINKLER, LEAKAGE AND EXTENDED COVERAGE
INSURANCE PREMIUMS
The vote was unanimously in favor.
February 10, 1981
LIQUOR ORDINANCE
Lindlan moved and Ulrick seconded a motion to table this item.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
BIDS - SALE OF TWO MOTOR VEHICLES
Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-56 RESOLUTION APPROVING SALE OF TWO MOTOR
VEHICLES WHICH WERE SEALED BIDS AND OPENED
BY THE CITY MANAGER TO THE HIGH BIDDERS -
L. ADAMSON AND KEVIN CRONIN AT $2,535.55
AND $2,600.00.
The vote was unanimously in favor with Lindlan abstaining.
COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FROM CITIZENS PRESENT
Buzz Sycks, 5900 Beachwood Road commented on the qualifications of Bill Hudson
as a candidate for Chief of Police.
Pete Ward, added additional comments favoring Sergeant Hudson.
A1Hofstadter, 5139 Woodland Road also supported Sergeant Hudson's qualifications.
REQUEST FOR USE OF COMMUNITY CENTER
Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to formulate a committee, not to
exceed seven members, to investigate the use of public buildings and submit
a report to the Council.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
PERMITS
Bingo Permits - Our Lady of the Lake Church, American Legion #398
Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-57
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF BINGO PERMITS
TO OUR LADY OF THE LAKE CHURCH AND AMERICAN
LEGION #398 AND ~AIVE THE REQUIRED BOND
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Gambling Permits - American Legion #398 and VFW Post #5113
Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-58 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A GAMBLING
PERMIT TO THE AMERICAN LEGION #398 AND THE VFW
POST #5113
The vote was unanimously in favor.
LAND
Tax Forfeit Land Conservation List
February 10, 1981 19
Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-59 RESOLUTION DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTIES AS
NON-CONSERVATION LAND
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-60 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THAT LOTS 7, 8, 9, 15,
16, 17 & 18, BLOCK 2, WOODLAND BE CONVEYED TO
THE CITY FOR WETLANDS
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Polston moved and Ulricl~ seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-61 RESOLUTION REQUESTING LOT 6, BLOCK 2, WOODLAND
POINT AND LOT 7, BLOCK 2, DREAMWOOD BE HELD
FROM PUBLIC SALE BECAUSE THEY ARE UNDERSIZED
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Polston moved and Ulrick seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-62 RESOLUTION REQUIRING TI~AT LOT B, BLOCK 3, ARDEN
BE CONVEYED TO T~E.CITY FOR STREET PURPOSES
The vote was unanimously in favor.
Lot 4, Block 14, Mound Terrace
Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to request the engineer and the Plan-
ning Commission review this item.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
City Owned Land - Part of Sec. 23, N of RR Tracks, Behind Sewer Plant
No action was taken on this item.
REQUEST FOR PARKING VARIANCE
Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion to deny the requested variance as
recommended by the Public Works Director.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion
RESOLUTION 81-63 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
REGARDING DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS TO BE
HEARD ON FEBRUARY 24, 1981 AT 7:30 P.M.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
TRANSFER OF FUNDS
Swenson moved and Ulrick seconded a motion
February 10, 1981
RESOLUTION 81-64
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF
CERTAIN CITY FUNDS
The vote was unanimously in favor.
PAYMENT OF BILLS
Swenson moved and Charon seconded a motion to approve payment of the bills as
presented on the prelist in the amount of $201,921.55 when funds are available.
Roll call vote was unanimously in favor.
I. M. 81-24 - MAPLE PLAIN SEWAGE
Polston moved and Swenson seconded a motion to recommend Item #3 and request
the Manager to advise the Metro Waste Control Commission.
The vote was unanimously in favor.
ADJOURNMENT
Ulrick moved and Swenson seconded a motion to adjourn to the Joint Council and
Planning Commission meeting on February 12, 1981 at 7:30 p.m. at the Island Park
Hall.
The vote was unanimously in favor, so adjourned.
Mary H. Cronin CMC, City Clerk/Treasurer
Leonard L. Kopp, City Manager
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 18, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-64
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Delinquent Utility Bills
At the February 10, 1981 meeting, the Council set the date of February 24
for the public hearing on the attached list of delinquent utility bills.
As you will notice, some payments have been made. A revised list showing
any additional payments will be at the Council meeting.
k--Leona
inquent Utility Bills
Over six months arrears
2-5-81
Account
~418-2617-41
33-439-2431-61
33-439-4750-71
33-439-4907-31
33-442-4416-91
33-442-4424-31
33-406-4660-41
33-463-4739-01
~-~-I,o~_~
33-472-4555-11
33-475-461o-71
33-475-4650-31
33-475-4679-21
33-478-2854-71
33-484-3341-21
33-484-5034c.~L
~ 1.0~ 1,0~_1 t
33-527-4712-91
33-53o-312~-81
33-53o-3126-71
33-5~4-4o65-71
33-569-4882-21
33-572-4872-71
33-575-49Ol-71
33-58~-2873-81
33-587-2944-41
33-599-4781-31
33-62o-3154-81~
33-620-4556-31
33-62o-4828-61
.33-623-5238-11
33-641-5220-11'
33-641-5251-61
Amount
$9o.q lZ
90 48
129.63
62.04
69.35
172.44
36.85
143.33
75.O8
119.88
91.80
54.22
95.4O
123.06
66.17
146.51
124.65
82.58
49.86
93.92
52.92
62.14
48.90
114.88
51.54
89.
85
82.58
105.88
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 17, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-59
SUBJECT: 1981 Bond Issues
E. Clark will be at the February 24th Council meeting to discuss the
1981 Bond Issues which are:
1. $1OO,000.00 in General Obligation Revenue Bonds
2. $275,000.00 in State Aid Street Bonds
The Attorney will have the necessary resolutions. In both instances,
the sale date will be March 10th and the bonds will be dated April-~
Toll Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002
Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122
Miller & Schroeder Municipals, InC.
170 Northwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 5.5431 · (612) 831-1500
February 12, 1981
SALE MEMO
TO;
Mr. Curtis Pearson
Wurst, Carroll and Pearson, P. A.
1512 First National Bank Building
Minneapolis~ Minnesota 55402
FROM:
Ernest L, Clark
ISSUE:
$100,000 City of Mound, Minnesota
General Obligation Revenue Bonds
RESOLUTION TO
SET SALE:
March 10, 1981, regular meeting
DATE OF BONDS: April 1, 1981
BONDS DUE:
$10,000 - 1982/91
INTEREST:
First coupon October 1, 1981 and semiannually thereafter
each April 1 and October 1
CALL FEATURE: None
COUPON RATES: 5 rates allowed, ascending order, 1/20 of 1% (.05)
DISCOUNT: $1,500
PAYING AGENT:
Designated by successful bidder within 48 hours of sale,
subject to ratification of City Manager.
DELIVERY:
Within 40 days of sale date, free anywhere in the
Continental United States.
SALW. DATE:
April 7, 1981, 11:30 A. M., award by Council 7:30 P.M.,
regular meeting, same date.
LEGAL OPINION:
Wurst, Carroll and Pearson, P.A.
1512 First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota · Branch Offices: Solana Beach, California · Northbrook, Illinois · St. Paul,/Vlinnesota · Naples, Florida
/~ember of the Securities investor Protection Corporation
"Toll Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002
Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122
Miller & Schroeder Municipals, Inc.
170 Horthwestern Financial Center, 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 · (612) 831-1500
February 12, 1981
SALE MEMO
TO:
FROM:
ISSUE:
RESOLUTION TO
SET SALE:
DATE OF BONDS:
BONDS DUE:
INTEREST:
CALL FEATURE:
COUPON RATES:
DISCOUNT:
PAYING AGENT:
Mr. Curtis Pearson
Wurst, Carroll and Pearson, P. A.
1512 First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Ernest L. Clark
$275,000 City of Mound, Minnesota
State Aid Street Bonds
March 10, 1981, regular meeting
April 1, 1981
$30,000 - 1982/83
$35,000 - 1984
$40,000 - 1985/86
$50,000 - 1987/88
First coupon October 1, 1981 and semiannually thereafter
each April 1 and October 1
None
5 rates allowed, ascending order, 1/20 of 1% (.05)
$4,000
Designated by successful bidder within 48 hours of sale,
subject to ratification of City Manager.
Headquarters: Minneapolis, Minnesota - Branch Offices: Solana Beach. California · Horthbrook. Illinois ° St. Paul, Minnesota · Haples, Florida
f4ember of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation
DELIVERY:
SALE DATE:
LEGAL OPINION:
Within 40 days of sale date, free anywhere in the
Continental United States.
April 7, 1981, 11:30 A. M., award by Council 7:30 P.M.,
regular meeting, same date.
Wurst, Carroll and Pearson, P. A.
1512 First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
CD CD 0 0 0 CD CD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 MD C~ '~' 04 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 tO 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 17, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-61
SUBJECT: Liquor Ordinance
Council Memorandum no. 81-41 Pages 358&357 was tabled at the last
meeting for consideration on February 24th.
This will be relisted on the February 24, 1981 agenda.
2-10-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
January 30, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-41
SUBJECT: Liquor Ordinance
Roger Rager of Rager's Pub has asked if the ban on pool tables in establishments
with liquor licenses can be amended.
Section ll.15 reads as follows:
SECTION ll.15 Conditions of Operation and Restrictions on Consumption.
a. No pool or billiard table shall be kept in the dispensary or any rooms
connecting therewith; nor shall any one on such premises keep, possess
or operate on such premises or in any rooms adjoining or connected there
with any slot machine, dice or any other gambling device or permit the
same to be so kept or used. No gambling shall be permitted on such pre-
mises, nor shall any person of a known immoral character or any disor-
derly person be permitted on such premises.
b. No other business than the sale of liquors shall be carried on by the
dispensary or by any person employed therein during the time so employed.
c. No liquor shall be sold to a person who is in an intoxicated condition.
d. No liquor shall be sold to a minor.
e. No person shall be permitted to loaf or loiter about the dispensary
habitually. (Ord. 41 - 4/28/1941 & Ord. 273 - 9/17/1970)
The Attorney was asked if the pool-billiard table prohibition was a State Re-
quirement or was this ~omething the Council required. The Attorney's reply is
attached.
It seems that the Council can modify the ordinance if they so desire. If the
Council wishes to modify the ordinance, it is suggested they investigate the
number of licenses that can be issued. At the time the ordinance was estab-
lished, the Council could not issue more than 3 licenses and if they did, they
would have to give up the municipal off-sale. There has been several changes
in the liquor legislation since the first passage and possibly more than three
licenses can be issued.
If the ordinance is to be changed, we should also check the investigation fee.
$1OO.OO is too small a fee; it should be a $500.00 minimum.
This will be listed for discussion on February 10th.
cc: R. Rager
GEI~ALD T. CARROLL
CURTIS A. PEARSON
~'HOI~qAS F". UNDERWOOD
AL~IERT FAULCONER 'r~
JAMES D. LARSON
JOHN W. WOOD, JR.
LAW OFFICES
WURST, CARROLL ~ PEARSON
I51Z FIRS"I' BANK PLACE WES"[
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5540:3'
January 21, 1981
TELEPHONE
{61z) 338-8911
Mr. Leonard L. Kopp
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Re: Ray Rager Request for Ordinance Change
Dear Len:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of January 9, 1981
indicating that Ray Rager is thinking of applying for a liquor
license and he also wants the intoxicating liquor ordinance
changed.
Your question to me is, "Can the council, if they so desire,
amend Section 11.15 of the City Code to delete the prohibition
against pool or billiard tables." I have reviewed the statutes and
find no requirement which would prohibit a pool or billiard table.
I do call to your attention that intoxicating liquor licenses are
essentially issued o~~otels and restaurants. I believe it
was the desire of t~e'City C~-u~-~fl--~h~---~&~--~i~inally enacted
the intoxicating liquor ordinance to try to control liquor and in
effect to prohibit the sale of on-sale licenses unless it was in
conjunction with a hotel or restaurant operation.
Our ordinance in Section 11.50, Subd. 2, indicates that on-sale
licenses be issued only to hotels and resta~_~ants and further
limits the number of on-sale lice~nses to ~hr~. I guess the council
would have to consider from a' po-p-61~~dpoi6~hether they consider
pool and billiard tables to be synonymous with th~koperation of a
hotel or restaurant liquor license. They do have Re authority to
make the change and they will have to decide if that. s necessary.
V~y trul~y/~rs, ~
Curtis A. Pearson
- City Attorney ~q~
CAP: ms
¢7?
2-24-81
CITY OF HOUND
Hound, Minnesota
February 19, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-70
SUBJECT: Liquor Ordinance - Addendum to Council Memorandum 81-61
At the last Council meeting, the Council discussed the investigation
fee on new Liquor License.
The present ordinance requires a $100.00 deposit for investigation fee
with the provision that we can bill for additional cost.
Attached is a copy of a memorandum from the Acting Police Chief saying
he cannot say exactly how much time will be involved.
Also we are attaching copies of pages 4, 5 and 6 of the ordinance
which lists the items to be verified.
Due to the amount of time and cost, it would seem that a $500.00 deposit
would be in line and we can refund if the cost is less than $500.00 and
bill if it is more 'than $500.00.
II TEROFFICE MEI
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Leonard Kopp - City Hanager
Sgt. I~illiam Hudson - Acting Chief
Liquor Investigations
DATE February
.lgO._L
As you are aware of, police investigate all liquor license applications
as required by Mound Ordinance Chapter 11, Sub 3. The main areas of
concentration in Chapter !1, amongst others, are Sub. Div. 4, 10, 11,
and 14. As you can see, there is alot of information that must be
supplied by the applicants and verified and thoroughly investigated by the
police dept. As to time spent on the investigation, a number of things
have an impact:
1. Is the license application a new one or an existing one.
2. Number of principals involved in the liquor application.
3. Previous locations in and out of state of the principals.
4. Accessibility of records for each princiPal.
5. Time spent by the principal supplying information.
Of the investigations that have been done in the past, a solid week and
usually more is needed, manpower wise, to complete the investigation.
As I have already'indicated, it would be difficult at best to give you a
· minimum amount of time that/is needed on liquor investigations due to all
the variables involved.
' S9/~- William Hudson [
/und Police Dept.
VWH/sh
'77
Division 1
Chapter 11 - Page 4
It is hereby declared to be the public policy of the Village of Mound to
issue one less 'on-sale' liquor license than ~uth0ri~ed by 8tat~ law~ ~nd
to thereby avoid the abandonment of the municipal 'off-sale' liquor storB
operations. Unless otherwise authorized by .a majority of voters voting on
the question at a snecial election called for such ouroose, the Village
Council shall not issue the maximum number of liquor licenses authorized by
Minnesota Statutes 340.353 as mnended by Senate Fil.e 271, .1969 Minnesota
Legislature. (Ord. 273 - 9/17/1970 & Ord. 277 - 3/18/1971)
Subdivision 3. Applications for Licenses to be verified. Ev~-
cation for an 'on-sa~. q~-~n.~e shall be verified and filed with the Villa~
Subdivision 4. Contents of Application. In addition to information whi¢
may be required by the state liquor control commissioner, the application
shall state:
(1) Whether the a~plicant is a natural oerson, corporation, partnershi?
or other fnrm of organization.
(2) If the applicant is a natural person, the fo]lowing information
shall be furnished:
(a) True name, place and date of birth, and street residence addre,,
of apolicant.'
(b) Whether applicant has ever used or been known by a name other
than his true name, and if so, what was such name, or names, and
information concerning dates and places where used.
(c) The name of the business if it is to be conducted under a desi~
nation, name or style other than the full individual name of the
applicant.
(d) SPnether the aoplicant is married or single. If ~,uarried, true
name, place and date of birth and street residence address of aooli-
cant's present spouse.
(e) ~.~.~ether aoolicant and nresent sDouse are regist~.red voters and,
if so, where.
(f) Street addresses at which apDlicant and present spouse have iix
during the preceding ten years.
(g) Whether aoolicant or his spouse has ever been convicted of any
felony, crime or violation of any ordinance, other than traffic.
so, the aoplicant shall furnish information as to the time, place
offense for which convictions were had.
(h) Whether apolicant or bis spouse has ever been engaged as ~n
employee or in operating a saloon, hotel, restaurant, c_sfe, t~vern
or other business of s similiar nature. If so, applicant sbzli
furnish information ss to the time, place and length of '~i~e.
(i) The name, address and business address of each person wb.o is
engaged in Minnesota in the business of selling, manufacturing or
distributing intoxicating liquor and who is nearer of kin to the
applicant or bis spouse than second cousin, whether of whole or
half blood, or who is a brother-in-law or sister-in-law of the
ap,olicant or bis spouse.
C - 1 - 1971
(3)
Division 1
Chapter 11 - Page
(3) If the apolicsnt is e partnership, thc name and addresses of all
partners and all information concerning each ~rtner as is required of
a single apolicant in oaragraoh (2) above. A managing ~partner, or oart-
hers shall be designated. The interest of each oartner in the business
shall be disclosed. A true cooy of the oartnershin agreement shall be
submitted with the application.
(4) If the applicant is a corooration or other organization and is apr
plying for an 'on-sale' license, the following information shall be fur-
nished:
(a) The name and, if incorporated, the state of incorooretion.
(b) A true copy of the certificate of incorooration, articles of in~
corporation or association agreement ~nd bylaws.
(c) The name of the manager or prooeietor or other agent in charge of
the premises to be licensed, giving all the information about said pe~r.
son as is required of a single applicant in oaragraoh (2) above.
(d) A list of aLI natural persons who, singly or together with their
soo.~se, or s parent, brother, sister or child of either of them, own
or control an interest in said corporation or association in excess
of 5%, or who are officers of said corooration or association, togetbe
with their addresses and all other information required of a single
applicant in oaragraDh (2) above.
(5) The exact legal description of the oremises to be licensed together
with a plot plan of the ares showing dimensions, location of buildings,
street access, parking facilities and the locstions of and distances to
the nearest church building and school grounds. The Village Council shal
require the following off-street oarking requirements for licensees of
'on-sale, licenses:
(s) Hotel - At least one oarking soace for each guest room or each
dwelling unit provided in the des_~gn or redesign of the building.
(b) Restaurant - At least one oarking soace for each three seats.
Additional ~oarking of one oarking sosce for each two emoloyees on
duty during the largest shift.
The foregoing o~rking requirements for hotels and restaurants having
'on-sale' intoxicating liquor licenses shall supersede m~y off-street
parking req~irements established by Section 23.30 of the Village Code.
(6) The floor number and street number where the 'on-sale' sale of
liquor is to be conducted and the rooms where liquor is to be consumed.
An aoplicant for an 'on-sale' license shall submit a floor olan of the
dining room, or dining rooms, which shall be ooen to the public, shall
show dimensions and shall indicate the number of persons intended to be
~erved in each of said rooms.
(7) If a oermit from the federal government is required by the laws of
the United States, whether or not such permit has been issued, and if so
required, in what name issued, and the nature of the oermit.
(8) The amount of the investment that the aoolicant has in the business,
building, premises, fixtures, ~rniture, st~ck in trade, etc., and proof
of the source of such money.
C - 1 - 1971
ODivision 1
Chapter 11 - Page 6
/ (9) The names and addresses s£ all oersons, other than the soolicsnt,
who have any financial interest in the business, buildings, oremises,
fixtures, furniture, stock in trade; the nature of such interest, amount
thereof, terms for Da.yment or other reimbursement. This shall include,
but not be limited to, any lessees, lessors, mortgagees, mortgagors,
]_endors, lien holders, trustees, trustors and persons who bare co-signed
notes or otherwise loaned, nledged, or extended security for any indebt-
edness of the applicant.
(10) The names, residences and business addresses of three nersons,
residents of the State of Minnesota, of good moral character, not related
to the applicant or financially interested in the premises or business,.
who may be referred to as the applicant's character or in the case where
information is required of a manager, the manager's character.
(11) Whether or not all real estate and personal property taxes for the
premises to be licensed have been oaid, and, if not paid, the years for
~ich delinquent.
(12) Whenever the application for an 'on-sale' license, or for a transfe
thereof, is for .nremises either planned or under construction or .under-
going substantial alteration, the apDlication shall be accomosnied by a
(13) Such other information ss the ViLlage Council shall require.
Subdivision 5. Execution of A~D!ication. If the aonlicstion is by a natural
person, it shall be signed and sworn to by such nerson; if by a corporation,
by an officer thereof; if by a partnership, by one of the ~artners; if by an
unincoroorated assoc, iation, by the manager or managing officer thereof. If
the apDlicant is a partnership, any license, bond and insurance oolic¥ issued
shall be in the names of all the ~srtners.
set of preliminary plans showing the design of the proposed premises to
be licensed. If the plans or desitin are on file writh the Village Enginee
no such plans need to be filed with the Village Clerk.
Subdivision 6 Renewal Aoplication. Aoplications for the renewal of an exist-
ing license shall be made at least 60 days prior to the d~te of exniration of
the license and shall be made in such abbreviated form as the Village Council~
may approve. If, in the judgement of the Council good and sufficient cause is
shown by any anplicant for his failure to file ~or a renewal, within the time
provided, the Council may, if the other provisions of this section are comulied
with, waive this requirement and grant the application.
Subdivision 7. Accountant's Statement. At the earliest practicable time
after application is made for the renewal of an 'on-sale' license, and in any
event ~rior to the time that the application is approved by the Council, the
applicant shall file with the Village Clerk s statement made by a certified
iPublic accountant that shows the total gross sales and the total food sales
of the restaurant for the 12month period immediately preceding the date for
ling renewal applications.
C - 1 - 1971
2-24-81
CITY tF MIUN!
Mmunl, Minnes,ta
February II, 1~11
CIUNCIL MEMI~^NIUM NO. I1-;~
SUBJECT: Police Reorganization
At the February 10th meeting (See Council Memorandums 81-3 & 81-52), the
Council tabled the subject item and asked that it be rescheduled for
February 24.
This subject will appear on the agenda of the 24th.
2-10-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 3, l~ll
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-52
SUBJECT: Police Reorganization
The Council has indicated they wish to discuss Police Reorganization
at the February lOth meeting and it will be on the agenda.
The Manager and Acting Police Chief made their recommendations in
Information Memorandum 81-3 (Copy attached).
February 13, 1~11 ';':'
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The City Council
The Mayor
Police Reorganization
I am suggesting that we form a committee of 4 or 5 people to study
the police organization and report their findings back in 30 days.
Please send any comments you have on this suggestion either to my-
self or the City Manager.
The persons suggested to serve on this committee are:
J~'~B~l~ll
,~ob Hartigan
'~nell
If a 5th p~rson is needed, I would suggest Eo~ing.
RL/ms
Rock Lindlan
Mayor
CITY OF HOUND
Hound, Hinnesota
January $, l~ll
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 81-3
SUBJECT: Police Reorganization
The Council has discussed plans for reorganization of the Police Depart-
ment. At the last meeting, they asked that we meet with the Sergeants
and report their findings back to the Council.
We met with the Sergeants and it was their feeling that reorganization
and signing the contract were two different things. It was their feeling
that if they could have their choice:
1. The contract would be signed.
2. That reorganization should be held off until after the appoint-
ment of a new City Manager and a new Police Chief.
It was brought up in the meeting that last year's contract is in effect
until a new one is agreed on, therefore, they felt the contract should
be signed.
Reorganization
Reorganization of the Police Department as I see it, should be around the
problem we work with today and it would seem that the department should
have a Police Chief and two Sergeants.
This could give a supervisor on each shift except when they have days off,
vacation or are ill, .However, this might not give an investigator as we
now have.
Savings in doing away with Sergeants is not as great as you might believe:
Patrol Officers receive
Detective Sergeant (under the
new Contract
The other 2 Sergeants
$1,948 per Month
Difference
2,360 per Month $412.
2,250 ea.per Month 302. each
Per Month Savings - Total $1,O16.
Per Year Savings $12,192. '
If you do away with Sergeants completely, you will save about 1/2 a patrol-
mand and then you are without an investigator. If one of the patrolmen is
made investigator, you have to subtract $125.00 per month or $1500. Your
savings is then $10,692.
Also, by going to two Sergeants, you then could possibly be losing local
investigation. Does the Council wish the City to continue doing its own
investigation providing we have enough budget?
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 81-3
Police Reorganization - Page Z
It is recommended that the current contract be signed. That reorganiza-
tion be left to the new Chief. This would, keep two Sergeants and the
present Acting Chief until that time.
The Acting Chief was asked for reorganization recommendations and a copy
of his report is attached.
January 7, l~I1
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Mr. Leonard Kopp - City Manager
Sgt. William Hudson - Acting Chief
Police Department Reorganization Recommendation
Having myself bring forth recommendations to you, the city manager, at this
particular time in reference to certain needs of the police department, e~pecially
supervisory staff, is difficult at best. I express this due to recent council
action in an attempt to abolish all police department supervisory positions,
excluding the chief, due to budgetary considerations.
I also feel that there are two other major items that ought to be taken into
consideration at this time as it applies to reorganization or restructuring of the
Mound Police Department:
1. Your recent resignation and the hiring of a new city manager by May 1, 1981.
2. The chief of police resigning and the hiring of a new chief of police
shortly after the city manager's appointment.
Any reorganization at this time, ! feel, would be premature and not done with the
city's best interest at hand, nor of the police department's. I say this because
any reorganization or restructuring without input from the new city manager and
the new chief of police may not coincide with their management philosophy and
could hinder their management style, policies, and objectives. I feel the present
status, as applied to the organization of the Mound Police Department, should be
maintained at this time until the appointments of the new city manager and the new
chief of police are made.
By cutting all supervisory positions which have been maintained for more than eight
years, there will be a savings of not quite $11,000 on salaries for the year 1981.
This figure is based on the difference between the top patrolman and sergeants pro-
jected 1981 contracts.
By saving $11,O00 you are, in effect:
Eliminating positions and chances for advancement for officers within the
Mound Police Department.
The elimination of positions will affect a patrolman's incentive once he
or she realizes there is no chance for advancement and rewards for a job
well done and would simply put in his or her 40 hours a week.
Leonard Kopp
Jan. 7, 1981
Page Two
3. There will be a higher turnover rate due to employees moving on after
certain experiences are gained.
Positions that do become available will not draw quality applicants due
to lack of advancement potential.
5. With no supervisors, quality and quantity of work cannot be insured nor
can department rules, regulations, and policies be insured.
Patrolmen are not going to, on a day to day basis, make supervisory
decisions on technical and legal issues where they know they will be held
responsible and may suffer the consequences.
According to American's For Effective Law Enforcement, a nationally known
organization, there are three main reasons why law enforcement officers
and cities are being sued today. They are:
A. Negligent appointment
B. Negligent retention
Negligent supervision
I honestly feel that the reasons I have stated above in addition to many more not
mentioned, by far outweigh the $11,000 savings to the budget when all things are
considered, especially when liability is taken into consideration.
The budget for 1981, for the Mound Police Department, which was submitted to the
council and approved in its entirity, did have organizational structure of 1 chief,
3 sergeants, 7 patrolmen, and 2½ civilians.
The thing that is having t~e greatest impact costwise on the budget for 1980 and
1981 is the number of officers and amount of time they have been placed Injured On
Duty, we have not had sufficient personnel to cover their absences and overtime
has had to be paid out and laid-off employees retained. The amount of man hours
spent on Injured On Duty and sick leaves amount to that of 2 men for a full year.
The amount of time on holidays, vacations, IOD, sick, and training, amounted to
3.6 men for a full year.
With the present structure as I have it;
I can give supervision 18 hours per day five days a week, and 10 hours
a day two days a week during critical periods of time. During other
times, a supervisor is on call with a pager.
With a supervisor on duty, he will be the second officer on duty also
and will, in addition to his supervisory duties, perform as a backup and
answer calls.
30
The supervisor as acting chief will perform the chiefls auties along with
his investigating duties and training duties and will also perform backup
when available. _
Leonard Kopp
Jan. 7, 1981
Page Three
The above structure is giving the department two men on the majority of the time
during critical periods and supervision that is also needed, barring there is no
more IOD's.
I have contacted all the officers in the Mound Police Department at a departmentai
meeting and all officers stated that supervision is needed on the street during
their shifts.
I have contacted the following departments and found that:
Orono Police Department is responsible to a population of 11,000, has 13
men which includes 1 chief, 1 assistanct chief for 1981, and will be
looking at an additonal supervisor in 1982 or, if performance levels
drop or service levels drop before, they will look for an additional
supervisor in 1981.
South Lake Public Safety, which is responsible to a population of 10,000,
has 12 men which includes 1 chief, 2 sergeants, 1 investigator, and 8
patrolmen.
West Hennepin Public Safety, which is responsible to a population of
4,000, has 7 men which includes i chief and 1 sergeant.
Wayzata Police Department, which is responsible to a population of
approximately 37,000, has 7 men which includes I chief and i authorized
sergeant.
5. Minnetrista, which is responsible to a population of 3,000, has 5 men
which includes 1 chief.
6. Medina Police Department, population unknown, has 4 men, 1 of which is
a chief, however, they do not have 24 hour coverage.
Mound, which is responsible to a population of 10,000, with an 11 man department
which includes 1 chief, 3 sergeants, and 7 patrolmen, taking into consideration
duties performed, i feel has a just organizational structure.
I feel that under our present structure, as of now, we can efficiently operate
and provide services to the city until the new city manager and chief of police
is hired, y. ~~i~~~~~~~'/ ~~'~
Resp/~,ctfully, ~/
"'-~/I~LK. William M. Hudson, Acting O~
nd Police Dept.
WH/sh
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Moun~, Minne~ot~
February 17, l~l
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-63
SUBJECT: Bids - Under Floor Washing System
Attached is a copy of a letter from the Fire Chief giving two bids for
a system to wash the under carriage of the fire trucks.
They are:
Specialty Equipment Company, Inc.
Fadden Pump Company
$1,775.00
$1,794.00
(We don't pay
Sales Tax)
The City's $1,000.00 would have to come from the Fire Department's budget
and there are funds there.
~e~)nard [. KopP (~ ~
cc: R. Cheney
Box 37, Mound, Minnesota 55364
February 17,1981
City of Mound
l~ound, Y~. 55364
Attention: Leonard Kopp
Dear Leonard:
The following bids are being submitted for an
under-floor truck washing system. The Fire Department
feels this will help take care of some of the corrosion
on our fire truck bottoms.
I haw talked to the Mayor and the Fire Depart-
ment representatives from the Council. We would like the
City to spend $1, O00.00 toward the lowest bid and the Fire
Department will pay the rest.
We would like to get this on the agenda for the
February 24th Council meeting. Please keep me advised.
Bob Cheney, Chief
Mound Fire Department
SPECIALTY
EQUIPMENT
COMPANY INC.
7721 Pillsbury Ave. So.
Minneapolis, Minn. 55423
Phone 612/861-7491
Manufacturers of Hi Pre,ute Cleaning & Car Washing Equipment
Distributors of Specialty Equipment. Chemicals & Supplies
Steer
~one ~.~'" - ~ -. :~LW I ~
~ty ~ ~-'~' State '?~[~ l~p ~-~ Oemsit ~th orde~ ,~: c/~
Ship to:. B~ce S.D.B.of L.
St~et., B~k
~ts.~ ~ ~ state ~ Zi~ ...... ~, state
Ship on or about. F.O.B. factory Via
Electrical: ~-~ 3 wire ~ 4 wire ~/~-. Phase, Voltage Cycles
Fuel:~ Oil~Nat.Gasq--I L.P.Gas . Water: Pipe size P.S.I. __.Gr. Hardness
Special Conditions:
EQUIPMENT ITEMS
Total
Sales Tax TI
Total
~al~AOe
Order Dated,
S~esm.:
~o[a~i~n Order~o~ - Va~d
PUMP COMPANY
Proposal
TO
MOUND FIRE DEPT.
BOX 37
MOUND, MINNESOTA
55364
ATTENTION: BOB CHENEY
SUBJECT
855 - 3RD STREET S.W.
NEW BRIGHTON, MINN. 55112
TEL 636-7060
PUMP TO DELIVER 12 GPM ~ 250 PSI
1
All o~ers subiect to coflditio~ on reverse sice ufllM~ ofharwlse sDecifi,KI.
WE ARE PLEASED TO OFFER OUR QUOTATION ON_THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT:
MODEL lO10 CAT PUMP MOUNTED ON A HORIZONTAL V BELT BASE WITH BELT GUARD
POWERED BY A 2 HP 1800 RPM 115/220 VOLT SINGLE PHASE ODP MOTOR (PUMP TO
BE BELT DRIVEN ~ 900 RPM). TEE UNIT WILL COME COMPLETE WITH A MOTOR STARTER,
PRESSURE REGULATOR, AND 8 NOZZLES.
PRICE ON THE ABOVE $ 179~ O0
PRICE QUOTED IS F.O.B. FACTORY, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
ESTIMATED DELIVERY: 2 - 3 WEEKS AFTER RECEIPT OF APPROVED PURCHASE ORDER
IN OUR OFFICE.
TERMS: NET 30 DAYS AFTER INVOICE DATE, SUBJECT TO CREDIT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
ON THE REVERSE SIDE HEREOF AND SIGNATURE OF ACCEPTANCE ON THIS PROPOSAL.
I AM ATTACHING LITERATURE ON THE ABOVE. IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS,
PLEASE CONTACT ME. THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO QUOTE.
JT:ss
encl: CAT PUMP LEOPARD SERIES MODEL 1010 LITERATURE
ACCEPTED ffl~ ,,lay ~. 19 ....
Nam (M
Name a~ Title
SUBMITTED thk. ~ .day of -J-cx,~,,c~*~,
FADDEN PUMP CO.
..
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Moun~, Minnesota
February 17, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-62
SUBJECT: Revenue Sharing 1981
The City's Revenue Sharing allocation for 1981 is $46,843.
Before any of this money may be spent, there must be a public hearing.
March 24th is the suggested date for the hearing.
The 1981 Budget did not carry funds for the Spring and Fall clean-up;
lifeguards or the Summer recreation program.
Sharing.
These items would be:
Fall & Spring Clean-up
Lifeguards
Summer Recreation
This would leave $24,000. for other items.
This was left for Revenue
$9,000.
7,OOO.
6,OOO.
$22,000.
/ -
"~o~ard L. Kopp ~ ~
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 17, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-60
SUBJECT: Severance Pay Policy
When Charles Johnson left the City as of January 3, He. had 74.08 hours
in severance pay coming. The severance pay was paid based on the
1980 salary.
Johnson has requested this be paid on the 1981 salary. We checked
with the Attorney on this and he stated this was not a legal question,
but one of policy. Since no policy has been set on such payments
when they are a few days into the next year, we are placing this on
the February 24th agenda for a determination.
cc: Johnson
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 18, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-65
SUBJECT: Cigarette License Renewals
Cigarette licenses expire February 28th.of each year. We have received
the following renewal applications:
A1 & Alma's Supper Club
Gas Hut, Inc.
Metro 500, Inc.
Midwest Vending Company for Duane's "66" Station
Minnetonka Post 398 American Legion Club
Mound Lanes
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 18, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-69
SUBJECT: Garbage Collection License Renewals
Garbage Collection Licenses expire the 28th day of February.
We have received application for renewal from:
Woodlake Sanitary Service - 1 Truck
Dependable Sanitary Service - 1 Truck
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, M~nnesota
February 18, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-68
SUBJECT: Reduction in Retainage
Attached is a letter from Hardrives, Inc. asking for payment of a
portion of the retainage on the 1979 Street Project.
We have asked the Engineer to make a recommendation on this request.
H
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City of Mound Minnesota
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Mn. 55364
February 16, 1981
RE: 1979 Mound Street Improvement Project
Gentlemen:
As you may know, the 1979 Street Project has been completed. However,
Payment Request #15 for work completed through 12-31-80, still shows a re-
tainage of $116,525.45.
We feel that this figure far exceeds any amount that the City may feel
is necessary to protect it in case of any needed repair work.
Hardrives, Inc. is also presently under contract with the City of
Mound for the construction of the 1980 Street Improvement Project and has
just recently been awarded the Minnesota State Aid Project for Street Im-
provements on Three Points Boulevard and Tuxedo Boulevard. Hardrives, Inc.
has also posted Performance and Payment Bonds with the City for the completion
of the Projects.
Therefore, we and our sub-contractors request that this excessive retain-
age be reduced.
Please consider the above, and advise.
Sincerely,
Donald L. Rinowski
Division Manager
HARDRIVES, INC.
cc: Mr. Lyle Swanson - McCombs-Knutson & Assoc., Inc.
DLR/cam
2-24-81
CITY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 20, 1981
COUNCIL MEMORANDUM NO. 81-71
SUBJECT: Bingo Permit - Mound Mohawk Jaycee Women
The Mound Mohawk Jaycee Women have made application for a Bingo
Permit for March 28tho Bingo will be played at the Mound American
Legion Hall.
They have requested the bond and fee be waived.
Leonard L. Kopp
ms
2-24-81
CiTY OF MOUND
Mound, Minnesota
February 18, 1981
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM NO. 81-33
SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Land
Lots 18, 19, 20 & 21, Block 7, Abraham Lincoln's Addition to
Lakeside Park have been tax forfeit for some time, but the City
has held them off sale since the City needed part of the land
for street right-of-way.
Since the street right-of-way has been taken, we will ask the
County to put the balance of the land on sale.
If the Council has objections to us so doing, please advise.
February 18, 1981
TO:
SUBJECT:
Public Works Director
Mound Dump
Attached is a copy of a letter from the Pollution Control Agency
objecting to the Mound Dump.
Please check with them immediately to determine what they are talking
about.
If this is the storage yard, we had better get it in shape so it
doesn't look like a dump.
LLK/ms
EncY.
cc: City Council
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
The Honorable Tim Lovaasen
City Hall
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Dear Mayor Lovaasuen:
Re: Mound Dump (HN-012), S 13, T ll7N, R 24W
During the Sum~ner of 1980 the above-referenced site was inspected as a part
of an inventory conducted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
in accordance with Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal
Facilities and Practices (Federal Register, September 13, 1979), promulgated
under the authority ~anted by Section 4004(a) of the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-580). This inspection indicated
that solid wastes have been deposited at this location recently. Deposition
of solid wastes at any location in the State without first obtaining a permit
from the MPCA is a violation of Minn. Rules SW-4 and SW-5.
The presence of uncovered solid wastes at this location may be presenting
real and aesthetic pollution problems. The MPCA, therefore, requests that
this dump site be terminated in complete accordance with Minn. Rule SW-12
(copy enclosed). Upon termination the enclosed "Disposal Site Closure Record"
should be completed and returned to this office. Each of the points in
Regulation SW-12 and the "Disposal Site Closure Record" should be adhered to,
even though some of them may not pertain to this particular site.
Your response to this letter within thirty (30) days is required. Please
address your written or verbal response along with questions you may have to:
Je£f Harth~
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Division of Solid Waste
En£orcement Section
1935 West County Road B2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Phone: 612-297-2706
Phone:
1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Regional Offices · Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester
Equal Opporlunity Employer
February 19, 1981
Mr. Jerry Longpre
2300 Commerce Boulevard
Mound, MN. 55364
Dear Jerry:
At one of your retailers~ breakfast meetings, it was asked what
could be done about the crosswalk by Mound Hardware.
I wrote the County and asked that they take another look.
I received my reply yesterday--see copy attached.
Sincerely,
City Manager
LLK/ms
Encl.
cc: City Council
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
320 Washington Ay, South
Hopkins, Minnesota 5534,3
935-3381
February 13, 1981
Mr. Leonard L. Kopp
City Manager
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, Mn 55364
Re: CSAH llO Crosswalk
Dear Leonard:
As you are aware we have previouSlYinYestigated the pedestrian crossing
on Commerce Blvd. between Lynwoo~, and the railroad tracks. Those ~nvest-
igations failed to identify a traffic si§nal warrant for~the pedestrian
movement. You will recall also that at one time the county proposed
construction of a median island °n Commerce at this location to aid
pedestrians. With an island the iroadwa¥ could be crossed one-half at a
time thereby enhancing safety., H~weveri, this proposal was not acceptable
to the council. ~ I
At this point we would suggest that
be delayed until after the construct
schedule if agreeable with the city
proceed on this basis.
further study into this problem
project this summer and will so
~less we hear from you we will
trulyI
~~cSe~g~eeE~
DLH:de
cc: Herb Klossner
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
February 17, 1981
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh Street and Robert Stred
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone (612) 291-6453
Office of the Chairman
Mr. Leonard Kopp, Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, Minnesota 55364
Re: Review of Mound ComprehenS
Review Commenced on Januar
Metropolitan Council Dist~
Metropolitan Council Ref~i
Dear Mr. Kopp:
The Metropolitan Council staff!
of the comprehensive plan
Land Planning Act. There doesl
tion as specified in the Act
review. The particular items
needs in order to complete
Land Use Plan
The environmental protection
Policies on stormwater
An expanded implementatlo~
the city intends to use
runoff, slopes, woodlands
high water table).
P lan
!, 1981
16
iFile No.
i
8562-2
;ompleted a preliminary review
in response to the MetroFolitan
to be sufficient informa-
)le the Council to complete its
:ed by statutes which staff
are outlined below.
,~ should include:
~ summarizing the controls
wetlands, stormwater
unsuitable soils (areas with
Public Facilities Plans
The plan should contain a sewer (lement which includes:
1. A map of the existing sewer :~ ystem.
2. The city's estimate of its 1490 sewer flow.
3. A map identifying existing al.d 1990 intercommunity sewer
flows and sewer flow amounts. The number of existing
sewered connections or residential equivalent and projected
connections for the next five years should also be included.
The city should also be aware that when it submits its sewer
Mr. Leonard Kopp - 2 - February 17, 1981
plan to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, the
Comralss~on w~ll also requireI cop~es of any agreer~ents
regarding interc0mmunity flo~g.
A statement on on-site seW· systems. If there are existing
on-site systems, the sewer should summarize the
standards the city intends
element should also indi~
any future on-site systems
will adopt regarding inst~l
Optional: Projected sew,
let for the next five years
nine months of Council ado
review, the city may wish t!
The plan should contain an airpol
Mn/DOT rule 14 MCAR 1.3015,
Navigation," subsection (C)
Obstructions" (see attachme
use to manage them. The sewer
whether the city intends to allow
if so, what standards the city
~ion and management.
connections or residential equiva-
!Since this will be required within
[On of the Mound Comprehensive Plan
furnish the information at this time.
~t element which addresses:
i'Determining Obstructions to Air-
"Notification" and (D) "General
~t 1). The implementation program
should indicate whether the city intends to incorporate these
regulations in the local co~es.
Mn/DOT rule 14 MCAR 1.3018 concerning seaplane operations in
the Metropolitan Area (see attachment 2). The implementation
program should likewise indicate whether the city intends to
incorporate these regulations in the local codes.
The Council and its staff are anxious to work with you to resolve
this matter as soon as possible. However, until sufficient informa-
tion is provided, the review will be suspended. In the next few
days Barbara Senness of the Council staff will be in touch to arrange
a meeting to explain the needed information in more detail.
After meeting with Council staff, if you disagree with the basis
for the suspension, your city may appeal the suspension to the Land
Use Advisory Committee as provided in Council Plan Review Procedures.
Appeal requests must be filed within 30 days of the suspension. A
request must be authorized by action of your city council, and it
should be directed to the Chairman of the Council. Upon receipt of
the request by the Council, the Land Use Advisory Committee will
contact and advise you on further appeal procedures.
CRW:im
CC:
Sincerely,
Charles R. Weaver
Chairman
James Daly, Metropolitan Council District No. 16
Barbara Senness, Local Planning Assistance (291-6419)
Barbara Moeller, Sewer Staff
Chauncey Case, Air Transportation Staff
Ray Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
HMENT 1
14 MCAR §1.3015 Criteria for determining obstructions to a{r
navigation. (~-~OTE: See ?~innesota Statutes §§360.961 et seq.,
for airport zoning statutes and Minnesota Statutes ~360.81 et seq.,.
for regulations of structure heights.)
N.otification. Any sponsor who ~proposes any construction or
alteration that would exceed a'height of 200 feet above ground
level at the site, or any construction or alteration of greater
height than an imaginary surface extending outward and upward
at a slope of 190:1 from the nearest point of the nearest
runway of a public airport shall notify the Commissioner at
least 30 days in advance.
General Obstructions. The following, objects will be considered
general obstructions to air navigation.
Objects extending more than 500 feet above ground level at
the site of the object.
Objects more than 200 feet above the ground or more than
200 feet above the established airport elevation, whichever
gives the higher elevation, within three nautical miles
of the nearest runway of an airport, and increasing in
height in the proportion of 100 feet for each additional
nautical mile of distance from the airport but not exceeding
a maximum of 500 feet above ground.
Objects which would increase the minimum obstruction
clearance altitude of a federal airway or appro'ved
off-airway route.
Objects whose.elevation will increase a precision.'or
n.onprecision instrument approach flight altitude minimum
or flight visibility minimum.
AT~HMENT 2
14 MCAn § 1.3018 Seaplane operations within the seven-county
metropolitan area.
Scope. 14 MCAn § 1.3018 covers seaplane operations on all
public waters within the following counties: Anoka, Carver,
Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington.
Seaplane operations are permitted only on the following public
waters within the seven-county metropolitan area.
4. Hennepin County
a. Bryant
b. Diamond Lake
c. Eagle Lake
d. Fish Lake
e. French Lake
f. Lake Independence
g. Lake Minnetonka, except the following areas:
Black Lake, Emerald Lake, French Lake, Forest Lake,
Gray's Bay, Libb's Lake, Peavey Lake, Seton Lake,
Tanager, Lake
Prohibited Operations. Seaplane operations are prohibited on all
public waters within the seven-county metropolitan area not listed
in paragraph B of this section. NOTE: See paragraph E of this
section.
De
Further Restrictions. Ail seaplane operations are prohibited
from 11 a.m. (CDST) to 6 p.m. (CDST) on Saturdays, Sundays and
national legal holidays between June 1 and September 15 on the
following public waters:
1. Lake Minnetonka and all bays and lakes therein.
However, this restriction contained in D. shall not apply to the
holder of a Private or Personal-use Seaplane Base License issued
under 14 MCAn § 1.3011 and § 1.3013 while operating to and from
his licensed base subject to the following conditions:
Such operations are limited to a maximum of one-takeoff and
one landing during these restricted hours; and
Such operations are authorized only when lake traffic and use
permit such operations to be conducted in a safe and reasonable
manner.
Emergency Use. Nothing in 14 MCAn § 1.3018 shall be construed
to prohibit the landing or taking off of a seaplane in case of
a bona fide emergency.
Ski-Equipped Aircraft. When lakes are frozen, aircraft equipped
with either wheels or skis may operate on the lakes, if such
operations can be conducted in a safe and reasonable manner
relative to lake traffic and use.
Mr. Leonard Kopp
City of Mound
5341Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Subject;
City of Mound
City Owned Land on West Edge Boulevard
3ob #2113 - General
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS ! LAND SURVEYORS · SITE/. ~f,"IPLANNERS'~ A ~-~'¢1~
February 17, 1981f,'. ~,
Dear Mr. Kopp:
As requested, we have examined the city owned property north of the
railroad tracks on West Edge Boulevard as a possibe future garage site.
The property is a triangle 320 feet by 840 feet (3.1 acres). The attached
drawings snows that the property does not front on West Edge Boulevard; however
access could be had to West Edge at the north end of the property.
The property is served by sanitary sewer. The nearest watermains are 670
feet to the north or 1050 feet to the south on West Edge Drive. The city's
long range water plans include tieing these lines together (both are ten inch
mains).
This is ample room on the site for a city garage, parking area, and storage
space. The site is wooded and if a garage were built on it, some of the trees
could be left to screen the adjacent properties.
To summarize, the property is suitable for a city garage site with the
disadvantages that another piece of property lies between it and the road and
that it is located on the edge of the city rather than being centrally
located. Another disadvantage is that access to the site is from West Edge
Boulevard, which is a gravel road located partly in Minnetrista and which has a
bridge under the railroad with low clearance.
Advantages are that it is zoned properly, has no homes nearby at the pre-
sent time, and has adequate space.
It is our recommendation that the property be retained by the city for a
city garage site until such time that a garage is constructed or an alternate
site selected.
Very truly yours,
LS: sj
Enclosure
McCON~3S-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
L~e wanson, . E.
Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls
printed on recycled paper
LOT I
~oo
.??.
3600
Citl ~ ~ound ,~
P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391
BOARO OF MANAGERS:
[:)avid FI. Cochran, Pres. · Albert L. Lehman · James S. I~ossell · John E. Thomas · Barbara
January 26, 1981
Mr. Paul Koosmann
PO Box 192
Rogers, MinnesQta
55374
Re:
Permit Application No. ~1-4
Location: Lot 3, Block 14, "Mound Terrace", Mound
Purpose: Dredging of an existing wetland area.
Dear Mr. Koosmann:
At its meeting of January ~5, 1981 the Board of Managers of the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed D~strict reviewed the subject permit
application along with th~ recommendation of the Engineer.
It tabled the permi~ application pending a determination of the
following:
'1.
Effect of the proposed work on the water quality of
receiving water bodies downstream.
What effect, if any, the proposed work will have on
local high water levels.
Thank you for your cooperation·
Sincerely,
EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES
Engineers for the District
E. A. Hickok, P.E.
EAH/bt
CC:
D. Cochran
G. Macomber
L. Kopp, City of Mound
AGENDA
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
February 19, 1981
Wayzata City Hall
7:30 p.m.
1. Call to order; present, absent, staff.
e
Reading and approval of minutes of regular meeting,
January 15, 1981
3. Approval or amendment of February 19, 1981, agenda.
4. Hearing of permit applications.
ne
76-30. City of Minnetonka - renewal of a fill permit
for "Meadow Park," Section 10, Township 117 North, Range
22 West, Minnetonka.
77-139. Victoria Commercial Developers, Inc. - revi-
sion of the grading/drainage plan for "Victoria Com-
mercial Development 2nd Addition," Victoria.
Ce
80-101. Keller Investment - grading/drainage review
of "Greenbriar III," located east of County Road 73,
South of Greenbriar Road, North of the Burlington Nor-
thern Railroad, Minnetonka.
De
80-113. J. Schuett - after-the-fact review of "Hillside
Terrace," located in the northwest corner of the inter-
section of Lakeview Lane and Laketown Road, Long Lake.
Ee
80-114. Halley Land Corp. - grading/drainage review of
"Ivy Park," located northwest of the intersection of
County Road 16 and Mayflower Avenue, Minnetonka.
Fe
81-1. R. Fisher - dredging in Lake Zumbra, Zumbra
Lane-Zumbra Ridge, Victoria.
81-4. P. Koosmann - dredging of a pond Lot 3, Block
" Mound
14, "Mound Terrace, .
81-6. S. Coddon - shoreline rip-rap, Coutny Road
125, Spring Park Bay - Lake Minnetonka, Spring Park.
MINUTEg OP TME REGULAR MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT
January 15, 1981
The regular meeting of January 15, 1981, was called
to order by Chairman Cochran at 7:30 p.m. at the Wayzata City
Hall, Wayzata, Minnesota.
Managers Present:
Cochran, Thomas, Gudmundson,
and Lehman
Manager Absent:
Russell
Also present were Board advisors Panzer, Fretheim
and Haik. Steve Stewart was also present.
Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the regular meeting of December 11,
1980, were reviewed. The following corrections were noted:
Page 2, the paragraph dealing with Boulder Bridge
Farm, a portion of the sentence "The engineer indicated that
the outlet of the 8-inch pipe ..." should read "The engineer
indicated that the inlet of the 8-inch pipe ..."
Item No. 1 under the discussion, the word "altitude"
should read "elevation."
Page 7, the paragraph dealing with the Upper Water-
shed Improvement Project/Painter Creek Proposal, in the fifth
line, the words "had previously" should be inserted after the
word "managers."
Following further discussion, it was moved by Lehman,
seconded by Gudmundson, to approve the minutes of the December
11, 1980, meeting as corrected. Upon vote the motion carried.
M. Nelson - dredging and the placement of fill in the flood-
plain of Lake Minnetonka (Libbs Lake), 3169 Lakeshore Boule-
vard, Minnetonka. 80-109
The engineer explained the proposed dredging and
placement of fill. He recommended that approval of the appli-
cation be given with conditions imposed that would prohibit
disposal of fill material below elevation 931.5 and would
authorize dredging and rip-rapping to the ordinary high water
Page 5
1/15/~1
ting storm water management system in the City of Minneapoli~ _
Following discussion, it was moved by Gudmundson, seconded b~--'~
Thomas, to approve the grading and land alteration permit re-
quest an accordance with the engineer's recommendation. Upon
vote the motion carried.
P. Koosmann - wetland alteration, Lot 3, Block
Terrace," Mound. 81-4
14,
~-Bay - Lake Minnetonka, Tonka Bay. 81-5
The engineer briefly reviewed the proposed request
to deepen-and existing wetland area. Following discussion, it
was apparent additional information would be needed. It was
moved by Thomas, seconded by Gudmundson, to table the request.
Upon vote the motion carried.
D. Dulebohn - placement of rip-rap, 4413 Manitou Road, Carman /~
proj~was in
The engineer advised that the proposed
all respects in compliance with District criteria. It was moved
by Lehman, seconded by Gudmundson, to approve the request. Upon
vote the motion carried.
Correspondence
The following items of correspondence were noted:
1. Letter to the managers from the Minnesota Associ-
ation of Watershed Districts and the Minnesota Water Resources
Board regarding the Metro Region Managers Meeting scheduled for
January 17, 1981, at the Radisson Hotel in the City of St. Paul.
Following discussion, it was agreed that the managers should
attempt to attend the meeting.
2. Letter regarding a request from the Jim Bain
Companies.for~background information concerning the Watershed
District. The letter was referred to the attorney for a reply.
3. Letter from Mr. Eugene T. Swenson, 1050 Xene
Lane, Plymouth, Minnesota 55447, requesting information con-
cerning the construction details of a project by the Centurian
Company authorized by permit No. 77-08, generally known as
Cimmaron Ponds, City of Plymouth. There followed a discussion
concerning the detailed information requested by Mr. Swenson,
being apparent that the engineer had furnished the data to Mr.
Swenson as of this date. The remaining questions were of a
legal nature which would require considerable evaluation and
review. The attorney was requested to reply Mr. Swenson con-
cerning the legal questions in his letter.
CHANHASSEN
CHASKA
EDEN PRAIRIE
WAFTA
WESTERN AREA FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY
EXCELSIOR
LONG LAKE
MAPLE PLAIN
MAYER
MOUND
ST. BONIFACIUS
VICTORIA
WATERTOWN
The January 21, 1981 meeting was called to order by chairman Jerry Schlenk
at 7:30 p.m. at the ~,~VTA site.
The minutes of the December meeting were read and approved as read.
Treasurer's report
Checking account
Savings account
$ 170.94
2741.27 (Includes $41.27 interest)
Bills to pays John McCoy $15.00
Continental Telephone
NSP 236.37
Vogt 75.92
John McCoy 11.00
Earl W. Day 250.00
NAtion by Long Lake and seconded.by Mayer to pay bills.
postage
$37.03
sheet metal in smoke building
sec. fee & office supplies.
Motion carried.
Jerry Schlenk reported that there were no new developments concerning fire
training in conjunction with Hennepin Vo-Tech, the State Department of Education,
NSP, and the Minnesota Gas Company. Dick Bastion has been appointed the fire
instructor with NSP and there has been a fire instructor appointed from the
Gas Company.
The United Fire Fighters school in September was discussed. A motion was made
by Long Lake and seconded by Eden Prairie to charge the United Fire ~'ighters a
minimum of $200.00 for this echool with $2.00 per man charged for each man
over 100 who attend the school. This charge would help cover the costs Luvol?ed
in having the school at the site. Long Lake requests that each department
should send the letters back that Long Lake had sent out concerning the school.
Other schools were discussed for next summer.
Member city not represented at this was Victoria.
There.willbe no regular meeting in February. The next regular meeting will be
March 18, 1981.
Respectfully submitted,
John A. McCoy
Secretary-trea s ~urer
II TEROFFICE MEI D
~0:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Leonard Kopp - C~ty Manager
Sgt. William Hudson - Acting Chief
Preliminary monthly activity report for January, 1981
DA?E February 10, 10 ~_.]_~
The final monthly activity report from the Mound Police Department has not been
totally completed as of this date. I feel, however, you should be aware of
some of the changes in the activity report in case there is an inquiry.
In this report I have compared the law enforcement activity in Mound for 1981
to 1980 and then compared that figure to all cities in 1980.
As you are well aware of, having law enforcement responsibilities to just
Mound and not Spring Park, St. Bonifacius, and Minnetrista, changed the
activity report somewhat. It should also be noted that during the month of
January 1981, we were short the services of the animal warden for ½ a month,
and three police officers.
MOUND MOUND ALL
ACTIVITY 1981 1980 CITIES-1980
Citations to include:
Hazardous, Non-hazardous, & Parking 411
DWI & Over .10% BAC 16
Accidents to include:
Property Damage and Personal Injury 15
Adult Arrests 29
Juvenile Arrests 10
Part I & Part II Reported Crimes 65
Medicals 24
Animal Complaints 30
Res ~iii~llaneOus/~tacts 570
//f~oun~/, WH/sdh Pol ice Department
318 459
6 6
5 7
15 22
7 8
45 79
15 24
82 120
617 886
HUN~CIPAL LIQUOR
CITY OF HOUND
BALANCE SHEET
FUND
Jarl o
1981
Assets
Current Assets
Cash on Hand
Cash in Bank & Investment
Loan to General Fund
Inventory
Prepaid Expenses
Total Current Assets
Fixed Assets:
Furniture Equipment Fixtures
Accumulated Amortization
Leasehold Improvements
Accumulated Amortization
Net Fixed Assets
Other Assets:
Total Assets
925
148,106
1,667
88,878
4,243
41,011
(35,967)
6,901
(5,400)
5,044
1,501
243,819
6,545
$250,364
Liabilities
Accounts Payable Trade
Sales Tax Payable
Accrued Expenses
Cash Over or Short
Total Liabilities
Equity
Fund Balance
Transfers Out
Net Income
Suspense
Total Equity
Total Liabilities & Euqity
23,013
2,016
130
(677)
165,143
(106,337)
126
166,950
24,482
225,882
$250,36~
ncome
Off Sale
MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
INCOME STATEMENT
1981
Jan. 1981
1980
Current Y-T-D
51,253 51,253
7]xpense
Cost of Goods Sold 39,465 39,465
GROSS PROFIT
rating Expense
Personal Services
Supplies
Prof. Services
Communications
Insurance
Utilities
Repair & Maint.
Rent
Other Contr Serv.
Depreciation
Other
Subtotal
11,788 11,788
8,973 ,, 8,973
163 163
ther
76 76
~81 381
518 518
675 675
211 211
4OO 4OO
15 15
11,203 11,203
OPERATING INCOME 585 585
Income
Interest
Refunds
Miscellaneous
Subtotal
NET INCOME
(47 6) ( 47 6)
17 17
(459) (459)
126 126
Current Y-T-D
46,343 46,343
35,684 35,684
10,659 10,659
5,380 ~,380
860 860
675 675
380 380
7,304 7,304
3,355 3,355
(485) (485)
465 465
(20) (20)
3,335 3,335
,.: COMBS~iil)i:i: -KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ,'
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 559-3700
February 12, 1981
Mr. Leonard Kopp
City Manager
City of Mound
5341 Maywood Road
Mound, MN 55364
Subject:
City of Mound
Country Road 110
Parking Restrictions
Job #2113
Dear Mr. Kopp:
As instructed, I have talked with Vern Genzlinger of Hennepin County re-
garding parking restrictions on County Road 110.
As requested by the Mound Council, the proposed no parking agreement on
those areas where no parking is allowed during peak traffic hours will contain
the statement that this does not apply to Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays.
Very truly yours,
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
LS :si
Minneapolis - Hutchinson - Alexandria - Granite Falls
printed on recycled paper
300 Metro Square Building, ?th Street and Robert Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Area 612, 291-6359
February 3, 1981
TO: Mayors, Municipal Managers and Town Board Chairmen
The report Land Disposal Abatement: Options for Solid Waste
Reduction and Recovery is now available from the Metropolitan
Council. The Council prepared the report to help local govern-
mental units develop alternative programs to disposing of mixed
municipal solid waste in sanitary landfills. Such land disposal
abatement programs include waste reduction at the source of
waste generation, recycling of waste materials, high-technology
energy and biological recovery, and the shredding and baling of
wastes to reduce the space they take up in landfills.
Land disposal abatement is an issue of growing importance. In-
creased cost of virgin materials, stiff public resistance to
siting new landfills and soaring energy costs are making abate-
ment programs more attractive as an alternative to the Region's
heavy reliance on landfills. I would like to encourage your
community's participation in county efforts now under way to
develop abatement programs.
Copies of the report have been sent to county officials,
planners and engineers, municipal engineers and township clerks.
To encourage interest and participation of local elected officials,
we would be happy to send you a copy of Land Disposal Abatement:
Options for Solid Waste Reduction and Recovery. For copies,
please call the Council's Public Information Office at 291-6464
(publication no. 12-80-081).
Sincerely,
Charles Weaver
Chairman
/bg
' ¢3'./
An Agency Created to Coordinate the Planning and Development of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Comprising:
Anoka County 0 Carver County O Dakota County 0 Hennepin County 0 Rarnsey County 0 Scot~ Count), 0 Washington County
· .. Fee-is attached
. OV 61980
I _.M.C.D.
$2.~0~ 11 / 80 to 11 / 81
mo .- yr. mo~ yr.
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
In mccordance with Chapter III of the Lake Hinnetonka Gonservatiom District Code~
the following special permit application shall be completed in all respects and
submitted to the District Office, 402 East Lake Street, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391.
It is unlawful for any person to install, operate, maintain, or use deicing equip-
ment or drain outlet which inhibits ice formation'in Lake Minnetonka, without a
special permit issued in accordance with this Chapter.
1. Name Tonka Toys
Date 10/28/80
2. Address
5300 Shoreline Blvd., Mound, MN 55364
e
Location and description of deicing equipment Cooling water discharge into
Lake Minnetonka, South Shore of Harrison Bay.
(a) Size of unit used:
- '
] / ! lbs- thrust
(b) Number of units'used:
(c) Area capability of unit(s):
sq. ft.
4. Purpose: Non contact cooling water discharge.
Deicing period (dates unit will be in use):
Municipal permit:
from all winter months.
Abutting lakeshore property owners: '- · ,~
(Name an.d .m.a.fl.ing address)
~ (Name and mailifi~g address) ~ ~~ L~.--~/~ ~'~
Other affected parties ~ ~j /mia X~ ~, X~. ~ ~¢'
( and mailing addresses - attach sheet if necessarY)
Before a special permit may be issued by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District,
the following statements must be checked:
X (a) That the'proposed installation will not be detrimental to the public health,
safetyi order and cpnvenience;
X (b) ~hat the area to be deiced be no greater than is necessary to prevent damage
to the installation and does not extend nor affect areas beyond the dock use
area for which the permit is issued;
X (c) .,~a~,adequate safety precautions will be followed during installation and "
operation of the facility, including a snow fence 4' high, at least 6 reflec-
torize~ signs* no more than 75' apart, allowfng deicing to occur only in
-the .permitted area, and meeting all. other requirements of the permit.
X (d) That the installation will he completely enclosed with snowfence and
adequately marked mm~x~g~ to protect the public;
(continued)
*See sheet attached
LAKE NNETONKA CONSERVATION DI R CT
Application and Special Permit for Deicing Installation - Page 2
X (e) That the applicant has taken appropriate steps, either by the obtaining of
insurance or otherwise to hold the District and its officers and employees
harmless from any damage or injury arising out of the operation of the
equipment;
X (f) That the installation will be made in accordance with applicable building,
electrical and other construction codes;
(g) That the installation will he maintained in a safe, neat and orderly con-
dition and be completely removed from the Lake by April 20th,
N/A (h) That the applicant will, by the installation of adequate screening, signing,
or other means, effectively prevent the feeding and congregation of water-
fowl and other animals and the creation of conditions constituting health
hazards or public nuisances within the permitted area; and
X (i) That the $25.00 permit fee accompanies this application.
I certify that the information provided herein and the attachments hereto are true
and correct statements as to the conditions of the application to the best of my
knowledge. I agree to the provisions of the special permit if granted, and consent
to permitting officers and agents of the District to enter the premises at all
reasonable times to investigate and to determine whether the Code of the District
is being complied with. '~~T~Y~~
Appli~
Signature of ,
Can be r~ched/t phone rfu~ber:. ~ mergency number: 472-8000
f/21 PERMIT
Special Deicing Permit approved by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Board
of Directors as above, subject to the following requirements:
In no case may deicing extend or affect areas beyond the dock use area for which
this permit is issued.
Approved:
Inspected: 1-23-81
Issued:
LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT
B~~~E x e/u~t iv~e ~ir~ct~r
10-80
DLICE/CRIME ACTIVITY REPORT
CITY HOUND HONTH JANUARY YEAR 1981
I. GENERAL ACTIVITY SUMMARY
THIS THIS YEAR LAST YEAR
/~CTIVITY MONTH TO DATE TO DATE
(Mound Only)
Hazardous Citations. 95 95 75
Hazardous Warnings 59 59 137
Non-hazardous Citations 58 58 -
Non-hazardous Warnings 103 103 -
Parking Citations 96 96 106
DWI 16 16 6
Over .10 BAC 15 15 5
Property Damage Accidents 12 12 7
Personal Injury Accidents 3 3 5
Fatal Accidents 0 0 0
Adult Felony Arrests 6 6 15
Adult Misdemeanor Arrests 23 23 -
Juvenile Felony Arrests 5 5 7
Juvenile Misdemeanor Arrests 5 5 0
Part I Offenses 24 24 45
Part II Offenses 41 41 -
Medicai s 24 24 15
Animal Complaints 30 30 80
Other General Investigations 570 570 617
TOTAL 1,185 1,185 1,122
~l-,-~t~ 0~,-- O combined with symbol of same type up thru April 1980
OFFENSE AC TIVITY~JMMAR Y
PART I CRIMES
Homicide
Rape
Robbery
A s s a ult
Burglary
Larceny
Vehicle Theft
Arson
TOTAL
14
24
Felonies Misdemeanor
Adult jJuv. A. dul Juv..
'PART II CRIMES
S.imple Assault
Forgery & Counterfeiting
Fraud
Embezzlement
Stolen Property
Vandalism
Weapons
Prostitution & Commercialized Vice
Sex Offenses
Narcotic drug laws
Gambling
Offenses against family & children
Driving under the influence
Liquor Laws
Public Peace
All other offenses
TOTAL
4 2
15
41
2
TOTAL PART I & PART II CRIMES
65 2
5
1I. PROPERTY LOSS/RECOVERY SU1MMARY
ITEM
Bikes
Boa ts/Snowmob i 1 es
Clothing
Currency, notes, etc.
Jewelry & precious metals
Guns
Home Furnishings
.Radio & Electron/lc equipment
Wehicle's & vehicle equipment
Miscellaneous
TO TA L
S TO LE,N
$ 100
900
3,720
1,935
10,203
550
812
2,200
148
3,729
$~4,297
RECO-VERED
$100
39
300'
$439
. City
MOUND ~ ' %~or[th JANUA'_ ~9, 81
,At Juv.
CI TA TIONS
DWI or OUI ,
More than .10 % BAC' Il 1
Careless Driving 1
Reckless Driving
Driving After ,Susp. or Rev. 2 1
Open Bottle 1
Speeding . 70 l0
No DL or Expired_DL 3 1
Restriction on DL
Improper, Expired, or no piates 26 ]
Illegal ,Pas sing
Unsafe Passing
Stop Sign violations 9 l
Failure to Yield 1
Illegal Equipment 2
Unsafe Equipment 2/4 1
H & R Leaving the scene
Illegal or improper lane usage ......
Illegal or unsafe turn
Over the center line 2
Illegal Parking 101 -
Ove rtime Pa rking
Dog ordinances
Derelict autos
Miscellaneous tags, , ! _
TOTALS l, 269 18
WARNINGS
Traffic
Equipment
Animals
Trash
Other
TOTAL !
WARRANT ARRESTS
64 7
75 .
5 1
144'
Felony
Misdemeanor
8 3
TOTAL ....